e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
þ
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
OR
|
|
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period
from
to
Commission File Number:
001-14437
RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS,
INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
52-2115953
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
Westpointe Corporate Center One,
5th
Floor
1550 Coraopolis Heights Road
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
|
|
15108-2973
(Zip Code)
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
|
Registrants telephone number,
including area code:
(412) 893-0026
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Number of shares of the Corporations common stock
(Common Stock) outstanding as of October 30,
2009 was 30,002,780.
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC AND CONSOLIDATED
SUBSIDIARIES
As used in this report, the terms RTI,
Company, Registrant, we,
our, and us, mean RTI International
Metals, Inc., its predecessors, and consolidated subsidiaries,
taken as a whole, unless the context indicates otherwise.
INDEX
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
100,247
|
|
|
$
|
150,615
|
|
|
$
|
310,655
|
|
|
$
|
461,092
|
|
Cost and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
82,426
|
|
|
|
113,492
|
|
|
|
263,047
|
|
|
|
322,708
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
|
|
|
15,384
|
|
|
|
18,723
|
|
|
|
46,526
|
|
|
|
54,829
|
|
Research, technical, and product development expenses
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
1,493
|
|
|
|
1,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
1,971
|
|
|
|
17,845
|
|
|
|
(411
|
)
|
|
|
81,965
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
2,006
|
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
799
|
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
|
|
2,172
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(7,231
|
)
|
|
|
(979
|
)
|
|
|
(12,007
|
)
|
|
|
(1,595
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(4,751
|
)
|
|
|
18,216
|
|
|
|
(9,087
|
)
|
|
|
82,413
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
3,901
|
|
|
|
6,964
|
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
30,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(8,652
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,252
|
|
|
$
|
(9,986
|
)
|
|
$
|
52,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.49
|
|
|
$
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.49
|
|
|
$
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
24,643,301
|
|
|
|
22,838,900
|
|
|
|
23,588,555
|
|
|
|
22,881,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
24,643,301
|
|
|
|
22,915,541
|
|
|
|
23,588,555
|
|
|
|
23,007,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
Consolidated Financial Statements.
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
124,733
|
|
|
$
|
284,449
|
|
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $605 and
$2,260
|
|
|
66,265
|
|
|
|
79,778
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
271,738
|
|
|
|
274,330
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
25,577
|
|
|
|
29,456
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
8,073
|
|
|
|
11,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
496,386
|
|
|
|
679,122
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net
|
|
|
305,272
|
|
|
|
271,062
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
49,401
|
|
|
|
47,984
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
14,136
|
|
|
|
13,196
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
30,611
|
|
|
|
15,740
|
|
Other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
1,602
|
|
|
|
2,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
897,408
|
|
|
$
|
1,029,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
43,032
|
|
|
$
|
54,422
|
|
Accrued wages and other employee costs
|
|
|
10,744
|
|
|
|
20,452
|
|
Unearned revenue
|
|
|
20,249
|
|
|
|
22,352
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
Current liability for post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
2,632
|
|
|
|
2,632
|
|
Current liability for pension benefits
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
21,342
|
|
|
|
18,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
98,120
|
|
|
|
119,521
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
238,550
|
|
Noncurrent liability for post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
31,520
|
|
|
|
30,732
|
|
Noncurrent liability for pension benefits
|
|
|
24,625
|
|
|
|
26,535
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
7,310
|
|
|
|
11,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
161,815
|
|
|
|
427,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares
authorized; 30,715,403 and 23,688,010 shares issued;
30,021,089 and 23,004,136 shares outstanding
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
438,547
|
|
|
|
307,604
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost; 694,314 and 683,874 shares
|
|
|
(16,979
|
)
|
|
|
(16,891
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(33,632
|
)
|
|
|
(46,352
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
347,350
|
|
|
|
357,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
735,593
|
|
|
|
601,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
897,408
|
|
|
$
|
1,029,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(9,986
|
)
|
|
$
|
52,102
|
|
Adjustment for non-cash items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
15,985
|
|
|
|
14,891
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(11,571
|
)
|
|
|
(15,614
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
3,668
|
|
|
|
3,942
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation activity
|
|
|
(439
|
)
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
15,363
|
|
|
|
899
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
5,423
|
|
|
|
(7,935
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
5,635
|
|
|
|
2,286
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
494
|
|
Unearned revenue
|
|
|
(3,510
|
)
|
|
|
16,088
|
|
Other current assets liabilities
|
|
|
(4,408
|
)
|
|
|
(9,444
|
)
|
Other assets and liabilities
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
(4,171
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
16,738
|
|
|
|
53,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(63,362
|
)
|
|
|
(88,815
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(63,362
|
)
|
|
|
(88,815
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation activity
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
Borrowings on long-term debt
|
|
|
1,181
|
|
|
|
227,011
|
|
Repayments on long-term debt
|
|
|
(243,449
|
)
|
|
|
(815
|
)
|
Financing fees
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
|
|
(1,313
|
)
|
Proceeds from government grants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,842
|
|
Purchase of common stock held in treasury
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(9,090
|
)
|
Proceeds from equity offering, net
|
|
|
127,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(114,743
|
)
|
|
|
218,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,651
|
|
|
|
(800
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(159,716
|
)
|
|
|
182,526
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
284,449
|
|
|
|
107,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
124,733
|
|
|
$
|
290,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Unrealized Gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) From
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Instruments
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
23,004,136
|
|
|
$
|
237
|
|
|
$
|
307,604
|
|
|
$
|
(16,891
|
)
|
|
$
|
357,336
|
|
|
$
|
(3,325
|
)
|
|
$
|
(39,321
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,706
|
)
|
|
$
|
601,934
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,986
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,986
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,543
|
|
|
|
7,543
|
|
Unrecognized gain on derivatives (interest rate swaps), net of
tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,325
|
|
Benefit plan amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,734
|
|
Shares issued for directors compensation
|
|
|
35,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued for performance share award plans
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued for restricted stock award plans
|
|
|
87,360
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense recognized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,668
|
|
Shares issued for equity offering
|
|
|
6,900,000
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
127,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,723
|
|
Treasury stock purchased at cost
|
|
|
(6,040
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
Exercise of employee options
|
|
|
4,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Forefeiture of restricted stock awards
|
|
|
(4,400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefits from stock-based compensation activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(430
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(430
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
30,021,089
|
|
|
$
|
307
|
|
|
$
|
438,547
|
|
|
$
|
(16,979
|
)
|
|
$
|
347,350
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(37,469
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,837
|
|
|
$
|
735,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
|
|
Note 1
|
BASIS OF
PRESENTATION:
|
The accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements of
RTI International Metals, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the
Company or RTI) have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States for interim financial information and with the
instructions to
Form 10-Q
and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, certain information and note disclosures normally
included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles have been
condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations,
although the Company believes that the disclosures made are
adequate to make the information not misleading. In the opinion
of management, these financial statements contain all of the
adjustments of a normal and recurring nature considered
necessary to state fairly the results for the interim periods
presented. The results for the interim periods are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the
year.
The balance sheet at December 31, 2008 has been derived
from the audited financial statements at that date, but does not
include all of the information and notes required by accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States for complete
financial statements. Although the Company believes that the
disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not
misleading, it is suggested that these financial statements be
read in conjunction with accounting policies and Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Companys
2008 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The Company is a leading producer and global supplier of
titanium mill products and a manufacturer of fabricated titanium
and specialty metal components for the international aerospace,
defense, energy, and industrial and consumer markets. It is a
successor to entities that have been operating in the titanium
industry since 1951. The Company first became publicly traded on
the New York Stock Exchange in 1990 under the name RMI Titanium
Co., and was reorganized into a holding company structure in
1998 under the symbol RTI.
The Company conducts business in three segments: the Titanium
Group, the Fabrication Group, and the Distribution Group.
The Titanium Group melts, processes, and produces a complete
range of titanium mill products which are further processed by
its customers for use in a variety of commercial aerospace,
defense, and industrial and consumer applications. With
operations in Niles, Ohio; Canton, Ohio; and Hermitage,
Pennsylvania; and a new facility under construction in
Martinsville, Virginia, the Titanium Group has overall
responsibility for the production of primary mill products
including, but not limited to, bloom, billet, sheet, and plate.
In addition, the Titanium Group produces ferro titanium alloys
for its steel-making customers. The Titanium Group also focuses
on the research and development of evolving technologies
relating to raw materials, melting and other production
processes, and the application of titanium in new markets.
The Fabrication Group is comprised of companies with significant
hard-metal expertise that extrude, fabricate, machine, and
assemble titanium and other specialty metal parts and
components. Its products, many of which are complex engineered
parts and assemblies, serve commercial aerospace, defense, oil
and gas, power generation, medical device, and chemical process
industries, as well as a number of other industrial and consumer
markets. With operations located in Houston, Texas; Washington,
Missouri; Laval, Quebec; and a representative office in China,
the Fabrication Group provides value-added products and services
such as engineered tubulars and extrusions, fabricated and
machined components and
sub-assemblies,
as well as engineered systems for deepwater oil and gas
exploration and production infrastructure.
5
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
The Distribution Group stocks, distributes, finishes,
cuts-to-size,
and facilitates
just-in-time
delivery services of titanium, steel, and other specialty metal
products, primarily nickel-based specialty alloys. With
operations in Garden Grove, California; Windsor, Connecticut;
Sullivan, Missouri; Staffordshire, England; and Rosny-Sur-Seine,
France; the Distribution Group is in close proximity to its wide
variety of commercial aerospace, defense, and industrial and
consumer customers.
Both the Fabrication Group and the Distribution Group utilize
the Titanium Group as their primary source of titanium mill
products.
|
|
Note 3
|
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION:
|
Stock
Options
A summary of the status of the Companys stock options as
of September 30, 2009, and the activity during the nine
months then ended, is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
352,680
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
170,430
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(6,334
|
)
|
Expired
|
|
|
(3,668
|
)
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(4,069
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
509,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
281,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of stock options granted was estimated at the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based
upon the assumptions noted in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.85
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Expected lives (in years)
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
58.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average grant date fair value of stock option
awards granted during the nine months ended September 30,
2009 was $13.88.
Restricted
Stock
A summary of the status of the Companys nonvested
restricted stock as of September 30, 2009, and the activity
during the nine months then ended, is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested Restricted Stock Awards
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
161,669
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
123,271
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(90,344
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(4,400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
190,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
The fair value of restricted stock grants was calculated using
the market value of the Companys Common Stock on the date
of issuance. The weighted-average grant date fair value of
restricted stock awards granted during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 was $14.46.
Performance
Share Awards
A summary of the Companys performance share award activity
during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 is
presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Maximum Shares
|
|
Performance Share Awards
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
Eligible to Receive
|
|
|
Oustanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
28,500
|
|
|
|
57,000
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
85,730
|
|
|
|
171,460
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(4,300
|
)
|
|
|
(8,600
|
)
|
Vested
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
109,430
|
|
|
|
218,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the performance share awards granted was
estimated by the Company at the grant date using a Monte Carlo
model. The weighted-average grant date fair value of performance
shares awarded during the nine months ended September 30,
2009 was $20.65.
Management evaluates the estimated annual effective income tax
rate on a quarterly basis based on current and forecasted
business levels and activities, including the mix of domestic
and foreign results and enacted tax laws. This estimated annual
effective tax rate is updated quarterly based upon actual
results and updated operating forecasts. Items unrelated to
current year ordinary income are recognized entirely in the
period identified as a discrete item of tax. The quarterly
income tax provision is comprised of tax on ordinary income at
the most recent estimated annual effective tax rate, adjusted
for the effect of discrete items.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, management
estimates that the tax benefit of foreign losses will fully
offset the Companys U.S. tax liabilities so that the
estimated annual effective tax rate applied to ordinary income
is zero. The comparable rate in the same period in 2008 was
37.3%. These rates differ from the federal statutory rate of 35%
principally as a result of the mix of domestic income and
foreign losses benefited at lower tax rates. The lower level of
expected annual income amplifies the rate impact of these mix
effects in the current period compared to the comparable period
last year.
The Company recognized a provision for income taxes of $3,901,
or (82.1)% of pretax income, and $6,964, or 38.2% of pretax
income, for federal, state, and foreign income taxes for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The quarterly provision represents the discrete
items of tax related to prior tax years and the reversal of tax
benefits provided in previous quarters on previously reported
losses. The relationship between tax expense and reported
results varies from the comparable period of the prior year
principally as a result of the mix of domestic income and
foreign losses benefited at lower tax rates, the effect of which
is amplified by the lower level of income in 2009. Included in
the three month provision were discrete items totaling $283
comprised primarily of normal adjustments made upon filing the
2008 U.S. federal income tax return. Discrete items
recognized during the comparable three month period ended
September 30, 2008 were not material.
The Company recognized a provision for income taxes of $899, or
(9.9)% of pretax income, and $30,311, or 36.8% of pretax income,
for federal, state, and foreign income taxes for the nine months
ended
7
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The provision
for the current year to date period is comprised entirely of
discrete items of tax related to prior years which are primarily
attributable to current year adjustments to unrecognized tax
benefits and normal adjustments for tax returns filed during the
period. Discrete items recognized during the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 were immaterial.
The Company is currently under examination by the Internal
Revenue Service for the years 2006 and 2007. It is reasonably
possible that the examination will conclude in the next twelve
months; however the Company is not able to estimate the impact
to unrecognized tax benefits at this time due to the preliminary
status of the examination.
|
|
Note 5
|
EARNINGS
PER SHARE (EPS):
|
Basic earnings per share was computed by dividing net income
(loss) by the weighted-average number of shares of Common Stock
outstanding for each respective period. Diluted earnings per
share was calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the
weighted-average of all potentially dilutive shares of Common
Stock that were outstanding during the periods presented.
In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) amended the existing guidance for determining
whether certain instruments were participating securities under
the existing guidance. The new guidance clarified that unvested
share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to
dividends or dividend equivalents, whether paid or unpaid, are
participating securities to be included in the computation of
earnings per share under the two-class method. The new guidance
was effective for the Companys fiscal year beginning
January 1, 2009 and was to be applied retrospectively. The
Companys restricted stock awards are considered
participating securities under the new guidance. The adoption of
the new guidance reduced basic EPS by $0.02 and had no effect on
diluted EPS for the nine month period ended September 30,
2008. There was no effect on basic or diluted EPS for the three
month period ended September 30, 2008.
Actual weighted-average shares of Common Stock outstanding used
in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(8,652
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,252
|
|
|
$
|
(9,986
|
)
|
|
$
|
52,102
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
|
24,643,301
|
|
|
|
22,838,900
|
|
|
|
23,588,555
|
|
|
|
22,881,457
|
|
Effect of diluted securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
|
24,643,301
|
|
|
|
22,915,541
|
|
|
|
23,588,555
|
|
|
|
23,007,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.49
|
|
|
$
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.26
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.49
|
|
|
$
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.26
|
|
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009,
options to purchase 511,620 and 498,526 shares of Common
Stock, at an average price of $30.86 and $31.41, respectively,
have been excluded from the calculations of diluted earnings per
share because their effects were antidilutive. For the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008, options to purchase
197,040 and 181,740 shares of Common Stock, at an average
8
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
price of $57.65 and $59.10, respectively, have been excluded
from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because their
effects were antidilutive.
Inventories are valued at cost as determined by the
last-in,
first-out (LIFO) method for approximately 62% and
61% of the Companys inventories as of September 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The remaining
inventories are valued at cost determined by a combination of
the
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) and weighted-average cost methods.
Inventory costs generally include materials, labor, and
manufacturing overhead (including depreciation). When market
conditions indicate an excess of carrying cost over market
value, a
lower-of-cost-or-market
provision is recorded. Inventories consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Raw materials and supplies
|
|
$
|
131,432
|
|
|
$
|
124,689
|
|
Work-in-process
and finished goods
|
|
|
215,970
|
|
|
|
228,745
|
|
LIFO reserve
|
|
|
(75,664
|
)
|
|
|
(79,104
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories
|
|
$
|
271,738
|
|
|
$
|
274,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the
current cost of inventories exceeded their carrying value by
$75,664 and $79,104, respectively. The Companys FIFO
inventory value approximates current costs.
|
|
Note 7
|
GOODWILL
AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS:
|
Goodwill. The Company does not amortize
goodwill; however, the carrying amount of goodwill is tested, at
least annually, for impairment. Absent any events throughout the
year which would indicate a potential impairment has occurred,
the Company performs its annual impairment testing during the
fourth quarter.
The Company performs its goodwill impairment testing at the
reporting unit level. The Companys reporting units, which
are one level below its operating segments, where appropriate,
are as follows: 1) the Titanium reporting unit; 2) the
Fabrication reporting unit; 3) the Energy Fabrication
reporting unit; 4) the U.S. Distribution reporting
unit; and 5) the Europe Distribution reporting unit.
Goodwill is tested annually during the fourth quarter and is
assessed between annual tests if an event occurs or
circumstances change that would indicate the carrying value of a
reporting unit may exceed its fair value. These events and
circumstances may include, but are not limited to: significant
adverse changes in the business climate or legal factors; an
adverse action or assessment by a regulator; unanticipated
competition; a material negative change in relationships with
significant customers; strategic decisions made in response to
economic or competitive conditions; loss of key personnel; or a
more-likely-than-not expectation that a reporting unit or a
significant portion of a reporting unit will be sold or
disposed. The Company last performed its annual goodwill
impairment test as of October 1, 2008.
The fair value of the Companys reporting units is
determined using a discounted cash flow model. The Company
believes a discounted cash flow model is appropriate as it
provides a fair value estimate based upon each reporting
units long-term operating and cash flow performance. This
approach also considers the impact of cyclical downturns that
occur in the titanium and aerospace industries.
Utilizing a discounted cash flow model, the fair values of the
Companys reporting units are calculated using a number of
assumptions, including projected future operating results and
cash flows, discount rates, and changes in working capital. The
Company considers historical experience and available
information at the time
9
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
the reporting units fair values are estimated. For the
Companys October 1, 2008 annual impairment test, a
12% discount rate, the Companys base discount rate, was
used for the Fabrication, U.S. Distribution, and Europe
Distribution reporting units. An 11% and 13% discount rate were
used for the Titanium and Energy Fabrication reporting units,
respectively, reflecting adjustments to the base discount rate
for specific risk factors associated with those two reporting
units. At October 1, 2008, a 1% increase in the discount
rate, or a 10% decrease in expected cash flows, would have
indicated a potential impairment at the U.S. Distribution
reporting unit, which had $6.9 million in goodwill. A 4%
increase in the discount rate, or a 40% decrease in expected
cash flows, would have indicated a potential impairment at the
Fabrication and Energy Fabrication reporting units, which had
$28.8 million and $8.7 million, respectively, in
goodwill.
The valuation method used for the October 1, 2008 annual
testing was consistent with the prior years annual test.
Significant assumptions that changed from the prior year
included general overall decreases in operating profits and
related cash flow projections due to the expected near-term
softening of the commercial aerospace and titanium markets. The
Company reduced the Fabrication reporting units cash flow
projections approximately 10% from the prior year to reflect the
near-term uncertainty in Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
production, offset by a more stable long-term production
outlook. Cash flow projections for the U.S. Distribution
reporting unit were reduced approximately 50% from the prior
year to reflect declining market prices and the spot nature of
sales by the U.S. Distribution reporting unit. Similarly,
cash flow projections for the Energy Fabrication reporting unit
were reduced approximately 50% from the prior year to reflect a
forecasted reduction in orders from its energy market customers
due to a forecasted decrease in energy prices from their record
highs. In addition, the October 1, 2008 discount rates
generally increased from the prior year. With the exception of
the Titanium and Europe Distribution reporting units, the
current year assumptions led to lower overall valuations of the
Companys reporting units, but did not indicate a potential
impairment for any of the reporting units.
For the Companys long-lead time products from the
Titanium, Fabrication and Europe Distribution reporting units,
the revenue and operating profit assumptions are primarily based
on contractual business under various long-term agreements.
Several of the larger long-term agreements were executed in 2006
and 2007, with production for these contracts not expected to
ramp up until the 2011 to 2012 timeframe. For instance, the
Company has a long-term supply agreement with Lockheed Martin to
supply the first eight million pounds annually of titanium mill
products for the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) when
production fully ramps up in the next decade. This volume will
increase the Companys titanium mill product shipments by
more than 50% over 2008 levels over the next several years.
Accordingly, operating results for the Titanium and Europe
Distribution reporting units were forecasted to grow at an
average Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of
approximately 15% each in the discounted cash flow analysis,
with this growth significantly weighted toward the later years
of the analysis. This compares to an average CAGR of
approximately 11% and 74% for the Titanium and Europe
Distribution reporting units, respectively, for actual results
over the previous four years. Operating results for the
Fabrication reporting unit were forecasted to grow at an average
CAGR of approximately 51% after year one of our discounted cash
flow analysis, reflecting not only the ramp up in sales to
Boeing related to the 787
Dreamliner®
program, but also the efficiencies gained as a result of the
increased utilization of the units production capacity.
For the Companys Energy Fabrication reporting unit, orders
are significantly dependent on the price of oil and natural gas.
While oil prices hit record highs during the summer of 2008, the
Company anticipated that, with the onset of the global financial
recession, accelerated by the global credit crisis and rising
unemployment, the prices of oil and natural gas would continue
to fall and capacity increases in the oil and natural gas
production industry would slow. As a result of these
expectations, cash flows for the Energy Fabrication reporting
unit were forecasted to grow at an average CAGR of approximately
11% in the
10
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
discounted cash flow analysis compared to an average CAGR of
approximately 40% for actual results over the previous four
years.
For the Companys U.S. Distribution reporting unit,
orders are dependent upon current market conditions. The Company
uses its historical market expertise to make assumptions about
future trends for this reporting unit. In light of the global
recession and global credit crisis, the Company forecasted a
significant near-term reduction in both volume and selling
prices. Accordingly, cash flows for the U.S. Distribution
reporting unit were forecasted to grow at an average CAGR of
approximately 6% in the discounted cash flow analysis.
As a part of the October 1, 2008 annual impairment test,
and at December 31, 2008, the Company considered its market
capitalization relative to its book value in evaluating for
potential goodwill impairment. This evaluation included a
consideration of both qualitative and quantitative factors. The
Company believed the decline in its stock price was
significantly affected by the equity markets reaction to
the global economic recession, exacerbated by the global credit
crisis that began in September 2008. The Company considered
these events in relation to its business which had a strong
backlog and relies heavily on long-term contracts and pricing
which extends out over the next seven to ten years. Other
qualitative factors which were considered included:
|
|
|
|
|
Strong Backlog Supported by Long-Term
Contracts The Company has a strong backlog and
relies heavily on long-term contracts and pricing which extend
out over the next ten years, including the following significant
contracts which are contributing to the Companys future
sales backlog:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Airbus Contracts Long-term agreements were
signed with Airbus in 2006 and 2007. Shipments under these
contracts are expected to average 5 million pounds of
titanium mill products annually from 2008 through 2015, with the
2007 contract being a supplemental contract extending through
2020. Total revenues of these contracts combined are expected to
approximate $1.9 billion over a
12-year
period.
|
|
|
|
Boeing In November 2007, the Company
announced it signed a ten year agreement with the
Boeing Company to supply extruded, welded, and
fully-machined, value-added structural titanium components for
the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®.
This contract is estimated to generate approximately
$900 million in revenue over its term which commenced in
2008 and runs through 2017.
|
|
|
|
Lockheed Martin In May 2007, the Company
entered into a contract extension with Lockheed Martin
Aeronautics Company (Lockheed) for the long-term
supply of titanium mill products that will support the
production of the JSF through 2020. The agreement calls for
Lockheed to purchase the first 8 million pounds of titanium
related to the program from the Company on an annual basis. The
contract is expected to generate revenue of approximately
$2 billion over the term of the agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall Long-Term Prospects for Titanium Coupled with our Key
Supplier Positions Titanium is and will remain a
key material used within the commercial aerospace and defense
markets due to the continued increased usage of titanium in
airframes and jet engines, as well as in artillery weapons and
armored vehicles. Titanium is growing in its use due to the
metals high strength, light weight, compatibility with
composites, and noncorrosive qualities. As a result of the
Companys current position as a supplier on the key
long-term programs noted above, it will be in a position going
forward to leverage these relationships as new opportunities for
titanium production arise within the commercial aerospace and
defense markets.
|
11
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated Business Model The Company
maintains a breadth of capabilities that span the production
cycle for highly-engineered titanium and specialty metal
components. Unlike other suppliers of titanium and various
specialty metals, the Company provides its customers with
solutions spanning the value stream, from titanium mill products
to major assembly, design, kitting, and system integration
(which the Company refers to as its Fabrication business). As a
result of the Companys participation throughout the supply
chain value stream, especially its unique fabrication
capabilities, the Company believes it offers significant
structural advantages as aircraft production increases and
continued design enhancements result in increased demand for
fabricated titanium parts. This demand and operating leverage
should serve to drive the Companys revenue growth and
profitability during periods of build-rate expansion.
|
Additionally, the Company considered, consistent with
FASBs authoritative guidance, the impact of a control
premium which may effectively cause a companys aggregate
fair value of its reporting units to exceed its current market
capitalization due to the ability of the controlling shareholder
to benefit from synergies and other intangible assets that arise
from such control. The fair value of the Companys
reporting units, using the aforementioned discounted cash flow
analysis and assumptions, exceeded its market capitalization
through the year.
The decline in the Companys sales and operating results
during the quarterly periods since October 1, 2008 did not
result in a re-evaluation of goodwill because, excluding the
nonrecurring cost overruns and execution issues at certain of
our locations, the Company had forecasted significant declines
in its results when performing the October 1, 2008 annual
impairment test. The Company does not believe the nonrecurring
cost overruns and execution issues associated with the
Fabrication and Energy Fabrication reporting units were
long-term in nature and indicative of a permanent decline in
business opportunities that would be considered an indicator of
potential impairment.
There have been no impairments to date; however, uncertainties
or other factors that could result in a potential impairment in
future periods may include continued long-term production delays
or a significant decrease in expected demand related to the
Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
program, as well as any cancellation of one of the major
aerospace programs the Company currently supplies, including the
JSF program or the Airbus family of aircraft, including the A380
and A350XWB programs. In addition, the Companys ability to
ramp up its production of these programs in a cost efficient
manner, or a long-term slowdown or delay in the energy-related
markets, may also impact the results of a future impairment test.
In September 2009, Boeing released an updated production
schedule in response to the most recent delay in the first
flight of the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®.
The new production schedule did not significantly change from
the previous schedule. As such, the Company determined the
release of the new Boeing production schedule was not a
triggering event for an interim impairment test.
The carrying amount of goodwill attributable to each segment at
December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009 was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
2,548
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,548
|
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
35,603
|
|
|
|
1,417
|
|
|
|
37,020
|
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
9,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total goodwill
|
|
$
|
47,984
|
|
|
$
|
1,417
|
|
|
$
|
49,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
Intangibles. Intangible assets consist of
customer relationships as a result of the Companys prior
acquisitions. These finite-lived intangible assets, which were
valued at fair value using an Income approach, are being
amortized over 20 years. The Company believes that this
approach is appropriate because it provides a fair value
estimate based on the expected long-term cash flows associated
with the revenues generated from these customer relationships.
In the event that long-term demand or market conditions change
and the expected future cash flows associated with these assets
is reduced, a write-down or acceleration of the amortization
period may be required.
There were no intangible assets attributable to our Titanium
Group and Distribution Group at December 31, 2008 and
September 30, 2009. The carrying amount of intangible
assets attributable to our Fabrication Group at
December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009 was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
$
|
13,196
|
|
|
|
(652
|
)
|
|
|
1,592
|
|
|
$
|
14,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8
|
UNEARNED
REVENUE:
|
The Company reported a liability for unearned revenue of $20,249
and $22,352 as of September 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008, respectively. These amounts primarily represent payments
received in advance from commercial aerospace, defense, and
energy market customers on long-term orders, which the Company
has not recognized as revenue.
Other income for the three months ended September 30, 2009
and 2008 was $252 and $551, respectively. Other income (expense)
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was
$2,006 and $(129), respectively. Other income (expense) consists
primarily of foreign exchange gains and losses from
international operations and fair value adjustments related to
the Companys foreign currency forward contracts. See
Note 15 to the Companys Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for further information on the
Companys foreign currency forward contracts.
|
|
Note 10
|
EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT PLANS:
|
Components of net periodic pension and other post-retirement
benefit cost for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 for those salaried and hourly
covered employees were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Other Post-Retirement Benefits
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
397
|
|
|
$
|
485
|
|
|
$
|
1,193
|
|
|
$
|
1,455
|
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
$
|
383
|
|
|
$
|
387
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,762
|
|
|
|
1,783
|
|
|
|
5,285
|
|
|
|
5,349
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
1,604
|
|
|
|
1,515
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(1,929
|
)
|
|
|
(2,218
|
)
|
|
|
(5,788
|
)
|
|
|
(6,654
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
618
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
910
|
|
Amortization of unrealized gains and losses
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
537
|
|
|
|
1,441
|
|
|
|
1,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
920
|
|
|
$
|
793
|
|
|
$
|
2,758
|
|
|
$
|
2,379
|
|
|
$
|
965
|
|
|
$
|
937
|
|
|
$
|
2,897
|
|
|
$
|
2,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
The Company made a cash contribution totaling $2.6 million
to its Company-sponsored pension plans during September 2009 in
order to maintain its desired funding status. No further
contributions are required during fiscal year 2009.
|
|
Note 11
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES:
|
From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation
relating to claims arising out of its operations in the normal
course of business. In the Companys opinion, the ultimate
liability, if any, resulting from these matters will have no
significant effect on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
Given the critical nature of many of the aerospace end uses for
the Companys products, including specifically their use in
critical rotating parts of gas turbine engines, the Company
maintains aircraft products liability insurance of
$350 million, which includes grounding liability.
Environmental
Matters
The Company is subject to environmental laws and regulations as
well as various health and safety laws and regulations that are
subject to frequent modifications and revisions. While the costs
of compliance for these matters have not had a material adverse
impact on the Company in the past, it is not possible to
accurately predict the ultimate effect these changing laws and
regulations may have on the Company in the future. The Company
continues to evaluate its obligation for environmental-related
costs on a quarterly basis and makes adjustments as necessary.
Given the status of the proceedings at certain of the
Companys sites and the evolving nature of environmental
laws, regulations, and remediation techniques, the
Companys ultimate obligation for investigative and
remediation costs cannot be predicted. It is the Companys
policy to recognize environmental costs in the financial
statements when an obligation becomes probable and a reasonable
estimate of exposure can be determined. When a single estimate
cannot be reasonably made, but a range can be reasonably
estimated, the Company accrues the amount it determines to be
the most likely amount within that range.
Based on available information, the Company believes that its
share of possible environmental-related costs is in a range from
$913 to $2,385 in the aggregate. At September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, the amounts accrued for future
environmental-related costs were $1,546 and $2,259,
respectively. Of the total amount accrued at September 30,
2009, $1,310 is expected to be paid out within the next twelve
months, and is included in the Other accrued liabilities line of
the balance sheet. The remaining $236 is recorded in Other
noncurrent liabilities. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, the Company made payments totaling $792
related to its environmental liabilities.
As these proceedings continue toward final resolution, amounts
in excess of those already provided may be necessary to
discharge the Company from its obligations for these sites,
which include the Ashtabula River and the Reserve Environmental
Services Landfill.
Duty
Drawback Investigation
The Company maintained a program through an authorized agent to
recapture duty paid on imported titanium sponge as an offset
against exports for products shipped outside the U.S. by
the Company or its customers. The agent, who matched the
Companys duty paid with the export shipments through
filings with U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(U.S. Customs), performed the recapture process.
Historically, the Company recognized a credit to Cost of Sales
when it received notification from its agent that a claim had
been filed and received by U.S. Customs. For the period
January 1, 2001 through March 31, 2007, the Company
recognized a reduction to Cost of Sales totaling
$14.5 million associated with the recapture of duty paid.
This amount represents the total of all claims filed by the
agent on the Companys behalf.
14
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
During 2007, the Company received notice from U.S. Customs
that it was under formal investigation with respect to
$7.6 million of claims previously filed by the agent on the
Companys behalf. The investigation relates to
discrepancies in, and lack of supporting documentation for,
claims filed through the Companys authorized agent. The
Company revoked the authorized agents authority and is
fully cooperating with U.S. Customs to determine the extent
to which any claims may be invalid or may not be supportable
with adequate documentation. In response to the investigation
noted above, the Company suspended the filing of new duty
drawback claims through the third quarter of 2007. The Company
is fully engaged and cooperating with U.S. Customs in an
effort to complete the investigation in an expeditious manner.
Concurrent with the U.S. Customs investigation, the Company
has performed an internal review of the entire
$14.5 million of drawback claims filed with
U.S. Customs to determine to what extent any claims may
have been invalid or may not have been supported with adequate
documentation. As a result, the Company recorded charges
totaling $8.0 million to Cost of Sales through
December 31, 2008. The Company recorded charges totaling
$0.2 million and $2.3 million during the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively.
No additional charges were recorded during the three months
ended September 30, 2009. The $2.3 million charge
during the three months ended June 30, 2009 resulted from
the receipt of formal notice from U.S. Customs in June 2009
indicating that they had denied certain of the Companys
previously filed duty drawback claims. The $2.3 million
charge represents 100% of the denied claims. While the Company
has reserved the right to formally protest the denial of these
claims, the inherent risks and uncertainties of the protest
process make it probable that it will ultimately be required to
reimburse U.S. Customs for the value of these denied claims.
These abovementioned charges represent the Companys
current best estimate of probable loss. Of this amount,
$9.5 million was recorded as a contingent current liability
and $1.0 million was recorded as a write-off of an
outstanding receivable representing claims filed which had not
yet been paid by U.S. Customs. Through December 31,
2008, the Company repaid to U.S. Customs $1.1 million
for invalid claims. The Company made additional repayments
totaling $0.3 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. As a result of these payments, the
Companys liability totaled $8.0 million as of
September 30, 2009. While the Companys internal
investigation into these claims is complete, there is not a
timetable of which it is aware for when U.S. Customs will
conclude its investigation.
While the ultimate outcome of the U.S. Customs
investigation is not yet known, the Company believes there is an
additional possible risk of loss between $0 and
$3.0 million based on current facts, exclusive of amounts
imposed for interest and penalties, if any, which cannot be
quantified at this time. This possible risk of future loss
relates primarily to indirect duty drawback claims filed with
U.S. Customs by several of the Companys customers as
the ultimate exporter of record in which we shared in a portion
of the revenue.
Other
Matters
The Company is also the subject of, or a party to, a number of
other pending or threatened legal actions involving a variety of
matters incidental to its business. The Company is of the
opinion that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not
have a material adverse effect on the results of the operations,
cash flows, or the financial position of the Company.
|
|
Note 12
|
EQUITY
OFFERING:
|
On September 11, 2009, the Company completed a public
equity offering of 6.9 million shares of its Common Stock,
which included an increase in the size of the offering from
5.0 million to 6.0 million shares and the exercise of
the over-allotment option of 0.9 million shares, at $19.50
per share. The offering raised $134.6 million before
offering costs. After the underwriters discounts and other
expenses of the offering, the
15
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
Company received net proceeds totaling $127.4 million which
were recorded in Shareholders Equity. The Company used the
proceeds of the offering, in addition to its cash and cash
equivalents on hand, to repay all amounts outstanding under its
$225 million senior term loan (the Term Loan),
the $13.1 million outstanding under its credit facility
between RTI Claro and National City Banks Canada Branch
(the Canadian Facility), and the $4.5 million
outstanding on its Canadian interest-free loan agreement.
On September 18, 2009, the Company repaid all amounts
outstanding under the Term Loan, Canadian Facility, and Canadian
interest-free loan agreement. As part of the repayment of the
Term Loan, the Company recorded a $4.9 million fee
associated with the termination of its interest rate swap
agreements and a $0.8 million charge associated with the
write-off of deferred financing fees. Both charges were recorded
as a component of Interest expense.
In connection with these repayments, the Company and its lenders
completed the first amendment (the Amendment) to its
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the Credit
Agreement). The primary effect of the Amendment is to
provide the Company additional flexibility on the Interest
Coverage ratio covenant of the Credit Agreement by excluding the
interest paid under the Term Loan and the Canadian Facility from
the calculation and to provide additional flexibility on the Net
Debt to EBITDA ratio covenant by permitting certain charges to
be added back to net income for the purpose of determining
EBITDA. The Amendment also increased the margin added to both
the base interest rate and the LIBOR interest rate and increased
the facility fee. There were no additional changes to the
covenants under the Credit Agreement.
Long-term debt consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
RTI term loan
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
225,000
|
|
RTI Claro credit agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,792
|
|
Interest-free loan agreement Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,995
|
|
Other
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
239,925
|
|
Less: Current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
238,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 14
|
SEGMENT
REPORTING:
|
The Company has three reportable segments: the Titanium Group,
the Fabrication Group, and the Distribution Group.
The Titanium Groups products consist primarily of titanium
mill products and ferro titanium alloys. The mill products are
sold to a customer base consisting primarily of manufacturing
and fabrication companies in the supply chain for the commercial
aerospace, defense, and industrial and consumer markets.
Customers include prime aircraft manufacturers and their family
of subcontractors including fabricators, forge shops, extruders,
casting producers, fastener manufacturers, machine shops, and
metal distribution companies. Titanium mill products are
semi-finished goods and usually represent the raw or starting
material for these customers who then form, fabricate, machine,
or further process the products into semi-finished and finished
parts.
The Fabrication Group is comprised of companies with significant
hard-metal expertise that extrude, fabricate, machine, and
assemble titanium and other specialty metal parts and
components. Its products, many of which are complex engineered
parts and assemblies, serve the commercial aerospace, defense,
oil and gas,
16
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
power generation, medical device, and chemical process
industries, as well as a number of other industrial and consumer
markets.
The Distribution Group stocks, distributes, finishes,
cuts-to-size,
and facilitates
just-in-time
delivery services of titanium, steel, and other specialty metal
products, primarily nickel-based specialty alloys.
Both the Fabrication Group and the Distribution Group utilize
the Titanium Group as their primary source of titanium mill
products. Intersegment sales are accounted for at prices that
are generally established by reference to similar transactions
with unaffiliated customers. Reportable segments are measured
based on segment operating income after an allocation of certain
corporate items such as general corporate overhead and expenses.
Assets of general corporate activities include unallocated cash
and deferred taxes.
A summary of financial information by reportable segment is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
28,853
|
|
|
$
|
49,367
|
|
|
$
|
86,280
|
|
|
$
|
156,868
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
25,586
|
|
|
|
35,931
|
|
|
|
94,615
|
|
|
|
126,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Titanium Group net sales
|
|
|
54,439
|
|
|
|
85,298
|
|
|
|
180,895
|
|
|
|
283,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
27,334
|
|
|
|
35,731
|
|
|
|
79,885
|
|
|
|
106,795
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
15,986
|
|
|
|
17,125
|
|
|
|
44,561
|
|
|
|
62,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fabrication Group net sales
|
|
|
43,320
|
|
|
|
52,856
|
|
|
|
124,446
|
|
|
|
169,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
44,060
|
|
|
|
65,517
|
|
|
|
144,490
|
|
|
|
197,429
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
642
|
|
|
|
1,863
|
|
|
|
1,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Distribution Group net sales
|
|
|
44,658
|
|
|
|
66,159
|
|
|
|
146,353
|
|
|
|
199,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
42,170
|
|
|
|
53,698
|
|
|
|
141,039
|
|
|
|
191,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated net sales
|
|
$
|
100,247
|
|
|
$
|
150,615
|
|
|
$
|
310,655
|
|
|
$
|
461,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium Group before corporate allocations
|
|
$
|
3,591
|
|
|
$
|
16,138
|
|
|
$
|
15,066
|
|
|
$
|
68,825
|
|
Corporate allocations
|
|
|
(2,569
|
)
|
|
|
(4,210
|
)
|
|
|
(7,713
|
)
|
|
|
(10,112
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Titanium Group operating income
|
|
|
1,022
|
|
|
|
11,928
|
|
|
|
7,353
|
|
|
|
58,713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabrication Group before corporate allocations
|
|
|
1,898
|
|
|
|
3,695
|
|
|
|
(6,968
|
)
|
|
|
10,913
|
|
Corporate allocations
|
|
|
(2,394
|
)
|
|
|
(2,713
|
)
|
|
|
(7,185
|
)
|
|
|
(7,511
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fabrication Group operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(496
|
)
|
|
|
982
|
|
|
|
(14,153
|
)
|
|
|
3,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution Group before corporate allocations
|
|
|
3,349
|
|
|
|
7,200
|
|
|
|
12,101
|
|
|
|
26,107
|
|
Corporate allocations
|
|
|
(1,904
|
)
|
|
|
(2,265
|
)
|
|
|
(5,712
|
)
|
|
|
(6,257
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Distribution Group operating income
|
|
|
1,445
|
|
|
|
4,935
|
|
|
|
6,389
|
|
|
|
19,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
1,971
|
|
|
$
|
17,845
|
|
|
$
|
(411
|
)
|
|
$
|
81,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Total assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
407,778
|
|
|
$
|
374,999
|
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
236,046
|
|
|
|
224,534
|
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
136,811
|
|
|
|
155,838
|
|
General corporate assets
|
|
|
116,773
|
|
|
|
273,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated assets
|
|
$
|
897,408
|
|
|
$
|
1,029,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 15
|
FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS:
|
When appropriate, the Company uses derivatives to manage its
exposure to changes in interest and exchange rates. The
Companys derivative financial instruments are recognized
on the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the fair value of
derivative instruments designated as cash flow
hedges, to the extent the hedges are highly effective, are
recorded in other comprehensive income, net of tax effects. The
ineffective portions of cash flow hedges, if any,
are recorded into current period earnings. Amounts recorded in
other comprehensive income are reclassified into current period
earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings. Changes
in the fair value of derivative instruments designated as
fair value hedges, along with corresponding changes
in the fair values of the hedged assets or liabilities, are
recorded in current period earnings.
On September 16, 2009, the Company terminated its interest
rate swap agreements (the swap agreements), which
had been classified as cash flow hedges, in preparation for
payoff of the Term Loan. The swap agreements, with notional
amounts totaling $146.3 million, effectively converted,
from floating-rate to a fixed-rate of 4.92%, the first 65% of
interest payments on the Term Loan. The termination of the
interest rate swap agreements resulted in a $4.9 million
charge to Interest expense.
As of September 30, 2009, the Company maintained several
foreign currency forward contracts, with notional amounts
totaling 5.0 million, that are used to manage foreign
currency exposure related to equipment purchases associated with
the Companys ongoing capital expansion projects. These
forward contracts settle throughout 2009. These forward
contracts have not been designated as hedging instruments;
therefore changes in the fair value of these forward contracts
are recorded in current period earnings within Other income
(expense).
A summary of the Companys derivative instrument portfolio
as of September 30, 2009, is below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of
|
|
|
|
|
Designated as
|
|
Financial Position
|
|
Asset (Liability)
|
|
|
Hedging Instrument
|
|
Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Foreign currency forwards
|
|
|
No
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
$
|
896
|
|
|
|
Note 16
|
FAIR
VALUE MEASUREMENTS:
|
The FASB defines fair value as an exit price, representing the
amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement
that should be determined based upon assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a
basis for considering such assumptions, a three-tier fair value
hierarchy prioritizes the inputs utilized in measuring fair
value as follows: (Level 1) observable inputs such as
quoted prices in active markets; (Level 2) inputs
other than the quoted prices in active markets that are
observable either directly or indirectly; and
(Level 3) unobservable inputs in which there is little
or no market
18
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
data and which requires the Company to develop its own
assumptions. The hierarchy requires the Company to use
observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use
of unobservable inputs when determining fair value. On a
recurring basis, the Company measures certain financial assets
and liabilities at fair value, including its cash equivalents.
The Companys cash equivalents consist of highly liquid
Money Market Funds that are classified within Level 1 of
the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted
market prices. The Companys foreign currency forward
contracts are estimated utilizing the terms of the contracts and
available forward pricing information. However, because these
derivative contracts are unique and not actively traded, the
fair values are classified as Level 2 estimates.
Listed below are the Companys assets, and their fair
values, that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as
of September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Market
|
|
|
Other Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
124,733
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
124,733
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
124,733
|
|
|
$
|
896
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
125,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009, the Company had no liabilities
that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. As of
September 30, 2009, the Company did not have any financial
assets or liabilities that were measured on a nonrecurring basis.
|
|
Note 17
|
NEW
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS:
|
In December 2007, the FASB revised the authoritative guidance
for business combinations. The revised guidance establishes
principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and
measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest
in the acquiree, and the goodwill acquired. The revised guidance
also establishes additional disclosure requirements related to
the financial effects of a business combination. The revised
guidance became effective as of January 1, 2009. The
adoption of the revised guidance did not have a material effect
on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued authoritative guidance
establishing accounting and reporting standards for ownership
interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent,
the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent
and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parents
ownership interest, and the valuation of retained noncontrolling
equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. The
guidance also establishes disclosure requirements that clearly
identify and distinguish between the interest of the parent and
the interests of the noncontrolling owners. The guidance became
effective as of January 1, 2009. The adoption of the new
guidance did not have a material effect on the Companys
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which
provided for additional disclosure requirements for derivative
instruments and hedging activities, including disclosures as to
how and why a company uses derivative instruments, how
derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted
for and how derivative instruments and related hedged items
affect a companys financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows. The new guidance became effective
as of January 1, 2009. The adoption of the new guidance did
not have a material effect on the Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements. See Note 15
19
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
to the Companys Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements for further information on the Companys
derivative instruments.
In June 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which
clarified that unvested share-based payment awards that contain
nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents,
whether paid or unpaid, are participating securities to be
included in the computation of earnings per share under the
two-class method. The new guidance became effective as of
January 1, 2009, and required retrospective application.
The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact
on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements. See
Note 5 to the Companys Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for further information on the
Companys earnings per share.
In December 2008, the FASB issued revised authoritative guidance
which requires additional disclosures about the plan assets of
an employers defined benefit or other postretirement plan,
to include investment policies and strategies; associated and
concentrated risks; major asset categories and their fair
values; inputs and valuation techniques used to measure
fair-value of plan assets; and the net periodic benefit costs
recognized for each annual period. The revised guidance is
effective for reporting periods ending after December 15,
2009. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact
the adoption of the revised guidance will have on its
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance requiring
disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim
financial statements as well as in annual financial statements.
The new guidance became effective for interim reporting periods
ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of the new
guidance did not have a material effect on the Companys
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance establishing
general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events
that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial
statements are issued or are available to be issued and
disclosure of the date through which subsequent events have been
evaluated. The new guidance became effective for interim
reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption
of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the
Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that
identifies the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the
Codification) as the sole source of U.S. GAAP
recognized by the FASB. The Codification identifies only two
levels of GAAP: authoritative and nonauthoritative. The new
guidance became effective for interim periods ending after
September 15, 2009. The Company is utilizing the
plain-English method for disclosures when referencing accounting
standards. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a
material effect on the Companys Consolidated Financial
Statements.
|
|
Note 18
|
SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS:
|
The Company evaluated subsequent events through November 5,
2009, the date the financial statements were issued.
20
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
Forward-Looking
Statements
The following discussion should be read in connection with the
information contained in the Consolidated Financial Statements
and Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The
following information contains forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and is subject to the safe harbor
created by that Act. Such forward-looking statements may be
identified by their use of words like expects,
anticipates, intends,
projects, or other words of similar meaning.
Forward-looking statements are based on expectations and
assumptions regarding future events. In addition to factors
discussed throughout this quarterly report, the following
factors and risks should also be considered, including, without
limitation:
|
|
|
|
|
statements regarding the future availability and prices of raw
materials,
|
|
|
|
competition in the titanium industry,
|
|
|
|
current delay in construction of, and potential further delay,
idling, or abandonment of our sponge plant project,
|
|
|
|
demand for the Companys products,
|
|
|
|
the historic cyclicality of the titanium and commercial
aerospace industries,
|
|
|
|
changes in defense spending and cancellation or changes in
defense programs or initiatives,
|
|
|
|
the success of new market development,
|
|
|
|
the ability to obtain access to financial markets and to
maintain current covenant requirements,
|
|
|
|
long-term supply agreements,
|
|
|
|
the impact of titanium inventory overhang throughout the
Companys supply chain,
|
|
|
|
the impact of Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
production delays,
|
|
|
|
our ability to attract and retain key personnel,
|
|
|
|
the impact if another party to a long-term contract fails to
successfully manage its future development and production
schedule,
|
|
|
|
legislative challenges to the Specialty Metals Clause of the
Berry Amendment,
|
|
|
|
labor matters,
|
|
|
|
global economic activities,
|
|
|
|
the outcome of the U.S. Customs investigation,
|
|
|
|
the successful completion of our expansion projects,
|
|
|
|
our ability to execute on new business awards,
|
|
|
|
our order backlog and the conversion of that backlog into
revenue, and
|
|
|
|
other statements contained herein that are not historical facts.
|
Because such forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties, there are important factors that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those expressed or
implied by such forward-looking statements. These and other risk
factors are set forth in this, as well as in other filings filed
with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) over the last 12 months, copies of which
are available from the SEC or may be obtained upon request from
the Company.
Overview
RTI International Metals, Inc. (the Company,
RTI, we, us, or
our) is a leading producer and global supplier of
titanium mill products and a supplier of fabricated titanium and
specialty metal components for the international aerospace,
defense, energy, and industrial and consumer markets.
The Titanium Group melts, processes, and produces a complete
range of titanium mill products which are further processed by
its customers for use in a variety of commercial aerospace,
defense, and industrial and
21
consumer applications. With operations in Niles, Ohio; Canton,
Ohio; and Hermitage, Pennsylvania; and the new facility under
construction in Martinsville, Virginia, the Titanium Group has
overall responsibility for the production of primary mill
products including, but not limited to, bloom, billet, sheet,
and plate. In addition, the Titanium Group produces ferro
titanium alloys for its steel-making customers. The Titanium
Group also focuses on the research and development of evolving
technologies relating to raw materials, melting and other
production processes, and the application of titanium in new
markets.
The Fabrication Group is comprised of companies with significant
hard-metal expertise that extrude, fabricate, machine, and
assemble titanium and other specialty metal parts and
components. Its products, many of which are complex engineered
parts and assemblies, serve the commercial aerospace, defense,
oil and gas, power generation, medical device, and chemical
process industries, as well as a number of other industrial and
consumer markets. With operations located in Houston, Texas;
Washington, Missouri; Laval, Quebec; and a representative office
in China, the Fabrication Group provides value-added products
and services such as engineered tubulars and extrusions,
fabricated and machined components and
sub-assemblies,
as well as engineered systems for deepwater oil and gas
exploration and production infrastructure.
The Distribution Group stocks, distributes, finishes,
cuts-to-size,
and facilitates
just-in-time
delivery services of titanium, steel, and other specialty metal
products, primarily nickel-based specialty alloys. With
operations in Garden Grove, California; Windsor, Connecticut;
Sullivan, Missouri; Staffordshire, England; and Rosny-Sur-Seine,
France; the Distribution Group services a wide variety of
commercial aerospace, defense, and industrial and consumer
customers.
We closed our distribution facilities located in Indianapolis,
Indiana, and Houston, Texas, during the first half of 2009. Both
of these closures were completed as part of our ongoing cost
rationalization strategy within the Distribution Group in light
of current market conditions and did not have a material impact
on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Both the Fabrication and Distribution Groups access the Titanium
Group as their primary source of titanium mill products. For the
three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
approximately 47% and 42%, respectively, of the Titanium
Groups sales were to the Fabrication and Distribution
Groups. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, approximately 52% and 45%, respectively, of the Titanium
Groups sales were to the Fabrication and Distribution
Groups.
Our net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2009
totaled $(8.7) million, or $(0.35) per diluted share, on
sales of $100.2 million, compared with net income totaling
$11.3 million, or $0.49 per diluted share, on sales of
$150.6 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008. Our net loss for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 totaled $(10.0) million, or $(0.42)
per diluted share, on sales of $310.7 million, compared
with net income of $52.1 million, or $2.26 per diluted
share, on sales of $461.1 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008.
Trends
and Uncertainties
Our business has been significantly impacted by the global
economic crisis. This impact was exacerbated by the severe
global credit crisis that started in September 2008. Our primary
market, the commercial aerospace industry, has been hit
especially hard by these crises as most aircraft purchases are
financed over long periods of time. The result of these two
crises, combined with the long-term delays in the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
program, is a significant oversupply of inventory and a severe
contraction in demand for titanium products. As a result, our
spot sales of titanium mill products have been minimal in the
current year. Somewhat offsetting these impacts has been our
focus on removing some of the cyclicality of the industry by
signing longer-term contracts for specific quantities of
material. These contracts have allowed us to maintain a level of
volumes in excess of those seen during the last market downturn
following September 11, 2001.
In such market downturns, we strive to reduce our variable costs
to counteract such declines in spot sales, although we cannot
always do so as quickly as sales levels decline. We continue to
balance our expectations of future business with our need to
control costs.
22
Production delays related to the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
program continue to hamper our Fabrication and Distribution
Groups. The 787
Dreamliner®,
which was initially scheduled to begin customer deliveries in
late 2007, currently has a first delivery date of late 2010. We
have invested a significant amount of capital into our
facilities to prepare for the ramp up of 787
Dreamliner®
production. As such, while we attempt to reduce our own variable
expenses (primarily labor, outside processing, overtime, and
supplies) to match the reduced near-term demand from Boeing, it
is not practical to reduce our fixed costs in the short and
intermediate term. While we expect to receive the anticipated
volumes from this program, it will be difficult to predict in
what period they will occur given the uncertainty in the
programs production schedule.
Three
Months Ended September 30, 2009 Compared To Three Months
Ended September 30, 2008
Net Sales. Net sales for our reportable
segments, excluding intersegment sales, for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
28.9
|
|
|
$
|
49.4
|
|
|
$
|
(20.5
|
)
|
|
|
(41.5
|
)%
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
27.3
|
|
|
|
35.7
|
|
|
|
(8.4
|
)
|
|
|
(23.5
|
)%
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
44.0
|
|
|
|
65.5
|
|
|
|
(21.5
|
)
|
|
|
(32.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated net sales
|
|
$
|
100.2
|
|
|
$
|
150.6
|
|
|
$
|
(50.4
|
)
|
|
|
(33.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The combination of a 5% decrease in the average realized selling
prices of prime mill products and a 38% decrease in prime mill
shipments to our trade customers resulted in a
$17.9 million reduction in the Titanium Groups net
sales. The decrease in average realized selling prices was
primarily due to changes in the sales mix between periods, with
the mix in 2009 consisting of a higher percentage of sales
related to long-term supply agreements, which generally carry
lower overall sales prices and are subject to annual pricing
adjustments. Furthermore, excess inventory in the market due to
the ongoing Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
program delays and the lower overall titanium demand profile
resulted in a reduction in spot market volume and a decrease in
realized selling prices on spot sales compared to the prior
period. Additionally, decreasing demand from the specialty steel
industry resulted in a $2.5 million reduction in ferro
titanium sales.
The decrease in the Fabrication Groups net sales
principally relates to continued delays in the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
program, as well as the general downturn in the commercial
aerospace market, which has resulted in a reduction in net sales
totaling $4.6 million compared to the prior year. In
addition, the relatively low price of oil compared to the prior
year has led to a slowdown in energy exploration and development
by our energy market customers, resulting in a $3.9 million
decrease in net sales compared to the prior year.
The decrease in the Distribution Groups net sales was
principally related to lower demand resulting from the global
economic downturn and the slowdown in the commercial aerospace
market, both of which have resulted in higher levels of titanium
inventory throughout the supply chain. Lower demand and lower
realized pricing for the Distribution Groups titanium and
specialty alloys products resulted in a $15.4 million and a
$6.1 million reduction in net sales, respectively.
Gross Profit. Gross profit for our reportable
segments, for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
5.9
|
|
|
$
|
18.5
|
|
|
$
|
(12.6
|
)
|
|
|
(68.1
|
)%
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
(27.4
|
)%
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
|
(41.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated gross profit
|
|
$
|
17.8
|
|
|
$
|
37.1
|
|
|
$
|
(19.3
|
)
|
|
|
(52.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
The decrease in the Titanium Groups gross profit was
largely the result of lower sales levels, which reduced gross
profit by $4.8 million. In addition, lower average realized
selling prices and a lower margin sales mix reduced gross profit
by $2.5 million. Higher raw material costs and lower
overhead absorption reduced gross profit by $3.4 million.
Furthermore, gross profit at the Titanium Group was unfavorably
impacted by $1.6 million due to reduced sales of Titanium
Group-sourced inventory by our Fabrication Group and
Distribution Group business.
The decrease in gross profit for the Fabrication Group was
driven by reduced sales volumes which reduced gross profit by
$2.4 million. The decreased sales volume was partially
offset by a slightly more favorable mix of products with higher
margins compared to the prior year.
The decrease in gross profit for the Distribution Group was
principally related to lower sales coupled with a decrease in
realized selling prices for certain specialty metals that
exceeded our decline in product cost. This decrease was
partially offset by our actions taken to rationalize our
domestic Distribution Group facilities and to reduce logistics
costs.
Selling, General, and Administrative
Expenses. Selling, general, and administrative
expenses (SG&A) for our reportable segments for
the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
4.5
|
|
|
$
|
6.1
|
|
|
$
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
(26.2
|
)%
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(9.5
|
)%
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
(17.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated SG&A expenses
|
|
$
|
15.4
|
|
|
$
|
18.7
|
|
|
$
|
(3.3
|
)
|
|
|
(17.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $3.3 million decrease in SG&A was primarily
related to a $1.1 million reduction in salary, benefit, and
incentive related expenses, driven by a reduction in expected
cash incentive compensation in the current year compared to the
prior year. Additionally there was a $1.2 million reduction
in professional and consulting expenses. The decreases reflect
managements focus on reducing expenses during the current
economic downturn while continuing to position the Company for
future growth.
Research, Technical, and Product Development
Expenses. Research, technical, and product
development expenses (R&D) were
$0.5 million and $0.6 million for the three month
periods ended September 30, 2009 and September 30,
2008, respectively. This spending reflects our continued focus
on productivity and quality enhancements to our operations.
Operating Income (Loss). Operating income
(loss) for our reportable segments for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
11.9
|
|
|
$
|
(10.9
|
)
|
|
|
(91.6
|
)%
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
(150.0
|
)%
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
|
(69.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
2.0
|
|
|
$
|
17.8
|
|
|
$
|
(15.8
|
)
|
|
|
(88.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in the Titanium Groups operating income was
primarily attributable to lower gross profit, largely due to
unfavorable volume and lower realized selling prices, which were
partially offset by a reduction in SG&A expenses.
24
The decrease in the Fabrication Groups operating income
was the result of lower sales volume to both the energy and
aerospace markets partially offset by reductions in
compensation, professional and consulting expenses during the
period.
The decrease in operating income for the Distribution Group was
largely due to lower demand in both the titanium and specialty
alloys markets. The lower demand resulted in decreased realized
selling prices for certain specialty metals that exceeded our
decline in product cost. This decrease was partially offset by a
decrease in compensation-related expenses and other cost
management actions, including the rationalization of our
domestic Distribution Group facilities.
Other Income. Other income for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was
$0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively. Other
income consists primarily of foreign exchange gains and losses
from our international operations and fair value adjustments
related to our foreign currency forward contracts.
Interest Income and Interest Expense. Interest
income for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008 was $0.3 million and $0.8 million, respectively.
The decrease was principally related to lower returns on
invested cash compared to the prior year period. Interest
expense was $7.2 million and $1.0 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The increase in interest expense was due to a
$4.9 million charge for the termination of our interest
rate swap agreements and a $0.8 million write-off of
deferred financing fees as a result of the payoff of our
$225 million term loan.
Provision for Income Taxes. We recognized a
provision for income taxes of $3.9 million, or (82.1)% of
pretax income, and $7.0 million, or 38.2% of pretax income,
for federal, state, and foreign income taxes for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The
quarterly provision represents the reversal of tax benefits
provided in previous quarters on previously reported losses and
the discrete items of tax related to prior tax years. Discrete
items recognized during the current quarter related primarily to
normal adjustments associated with filing the 2008
U.S. federal income tax return. Discrete items recognized
in the prior year period were not material. The relationship
between tax expense and reported results varied year over year
primarily as a result of the mix of domestic income and foreign
losses benefited at lower rates. The lower level of income
amplifies the rate impact of these mix effects in the current
period compared to the comparable prior period.
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2009 Compared To Nine Months
Ended September 30, 2008
Net Sales. Net sales for our reportable
segments, excluding intersegment sales, for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
86.3
|
|
|
$
|
156.9
|
|
|
$
|
(70.6
|
)
|
|
|
(45.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
79.9
|
|
|
|
106.8
|
|
|
|
(26.9
|
)
|
|
|
(25.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
144.5
|
|
|
|
197.4
|
|
|
|
(52.9
|
)
|
|
|
(26.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated net sales
|
|
$
|
310.7
|
|
|
$
|
461.1
|
|
|
$
|
(150.4
|
)
|
|
|
(32.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The combination of an 8% decrease in the average realized
selling prices of prime mill products and a 41% decrease in
prime mill shipments to our trade customers resulted in a
$63.1 million reduction in the Titanium Groups net
sales. The decrease in average realized selling prices was
primarily due to a higher percentage of our sales in the current
period were related to long-term supply agreements, which
generally carry lower overall sales prices and are subject to
annual pricing adjustments. In addition, changes in the sales
mix between periods contributed to the decrease in average
selling prices, with the mix in 2009 consisting of lower priced
products. Furthermore, excess inventory in the market due to the
ongoing Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
program delays and the lower overall titanium demand profile
resulted in a reduction in spot market volume and a decrease in
realized selling prices on spot sales compared to the prior
period. Additionally, decreasing demand from our specialty steel
customers resulted in an $8.0 million reduction in ferro
titanium sales.
25
The decrease in the Fabrication Groups net sales
principally related to continued delays in the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
Program, as well as the general downturn in the commercial
aerospace market, which resulted in a reduction in net sales
totaling $14.6 million compared to the prior year. In
addition, the relatively low price of oil compared to the prior
year has led to a slowdown in energy exploration and development
by our energy market customers, resulting in a
$12.6 million decrease in net sales compared to the prior
year.
The decrease in the Distribution Groups net sales was
principally related to lower demand resulting from the global
economic downturn and the slowdown in the commercial aerospace
market, both of which have resulted in higher levels of titanium
inventory throughout the supply chain. Lower demand and lower
realized pricing for the Distribution Groups titanium and
specialty alloys products resulted in a $37.6 million and a
$15.3 million reduction in net sales, respectively.
Gross Profit. Gross profit for our reportable
segments, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
22.1
|
|
|
$
|
76.1
|
|
|
$
|
(54.0
|
)
|
|
|
(71.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
23.8
|
|
|
|
(21.1
|
)
|
|
|
(88.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
22.8
|
|
|
|
38.5
|
|
|
|
(15.7
|
)
|
|
|
(40.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated gross profit (loss)
|
|
$
|
47.6
|
|
|
$
|
138.4
|
|
|
$
|
(90.8
|
)
|
|
|
(65.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding the $2.5 million charge in the current year
associated with the U.S. Customs investigation of our
previously filed duty drawback claims, gross profit for the
Titanium Group decreased $51.5 million compared to the
prior year. The decrease in the Titanium Groups gross
profit was largely the result of lower sales levels, which
reduced gross profit $18.4 million. In addition, lower
average realized selling prices and a lower margin sales mix
reduced gross profit $12.3 million. Higher raw material
costs and lower overhead absorption reduced gross profit by
$8.0 million. Deterioration in ferro-alloys margins due to
weakening specialty steel customer demand reduced gross profit
by $3.3 million compared to the prior year. Furthermore,
gross profit at the Titanium Group was unfavorably impacted by
$3.7 million due to reduced sales of Titanium Group-sourced
inventory by our Fabrication Group and Distribution Group
businesses.
The decrease in gross profit for the Fabrication Group was
driven by several factors, including reduced sales volumes which
reduced gross profit by $10.4 million and cost overruns
related to a certain energy market project which negatively
impacted gross profit by $7.2 million. In addition,
production execution issues at one of the Fabrication
Groups facilities negatively impacted its ability to
deliver orders, and lower than expected material yields at that
same location resulted in higher than expected material costs,
which reduced gross profit by $6.2 million compared to the
prior year. Ongoing uncertainty and delays in the ramp up of the
Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
program continue to result in lower utilization and other
operational inefficiencies despite significant actions taken by
the Company to manage costs in line with demand. These impacts
were partially offset by a favorable mix of higher margin
products in the current year, which increased gross profit by
$2.2 million.
The energy market project cost overruns were driven by a delayed
start and the need for higher than normal overtime and use of
subcontractors. This project was substantially delivered during
the three months ended June 30, 2009 and similar cost
overruns did not carry through into the three months ended
September 30, 2009. In order to ensure we do not have
similar issues on other projects going forward, we have added
additional project management resources to this facility. In
addition, we have implemented new planning and risk management
procedures to ensure projects are started, executed, and
delivered in a timely and efficient manner.
The manufacturing execution issues developed at one of the
Fabrication Groups facilities due to a suboptimal
management structure and deviations from established
manufacturing work procedures. The combination of these
inefficiencies and loss of discipline resulted in a lower
throughput and increased rework
26
costs. We identified these issues internally during the three
months ended March 31, 2009. To correct these issues, we
replaced both the segment and facility leadership and
implemented new procedures and production controls to increase
throughput and improve quality.
The decrease in gross profit for the Distribution Group was
principally related to lower sales coupled with a decrease in
realized selling prices for certain specialty metals that
exceeded our decline in product cost. This decrease was
partially offset by our actions taken to rationalize several
Distribution Group facilities and to reduce product cost.
Selling, General, and Administrative
Expenses. SG&A expenses for our reportable
segments for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
13.4
|
|
|
$
|
15.9
|
|
|
$
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
|
(15.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)
|
|
|
(18.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
16.4
|
|
|
|
18.5
|
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
(11.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated SG&A expenses
|
|
$
|
46.5
|
|
|
$
|
54.8
|
|
|
$
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
(15.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $8.3 million decrease in SG&A was primarily
related to a $4.2 million reduction in salary, benefit, and
incentive related expenses, driven by a reduction in expected
cash incentive compensation in the current year compared to the
prior year. Additionally, there was a $3.1 million
reduction in professional and consulting expenses. The decreases
reflect managements focus on reducing expenses during the
current economic downturn while continuing to position the
Company for future growth.
Research, Technical, and Product Development
Expenses. R&D expenses were
$1.5 million and $1.6 million for the nine month
periods ended September 30, 2009 and September 30,
2008, respectively. This spending reflects our continued focus
on productivity and quality enhancements to our operations.
Operating Income (Loss). Operating income
(loss) for our reportable segments for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
7.4
|
|
|
$
|
58.7
|
|
|
$
|
(51.3
|
)
|
|
|
(87.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
(14.2
|
)
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
(17.6
|
)
|
|
|
(517.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
|
|
(13.5
|
)
|
|
|
(67.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
82.0
|
|
|
$
|
(82.4
|
)
|
|
|
(100.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding the $2.5 million charge in the current period
associated with the U.S. Customs investigation of our
previously filed duty drawback claims, operating income for the
Titanium Group decreased $48.8 million. The decrease was
primarily attributable to lower gross profit, largely due to
unfavorable volume and lower realized selling prices, which were
partially offset by a reduction in SG&A expenses.
The decrease in the Fabrication Groups operating income
was the result of lower sales to both the energy and aerospace
markets, along with cost overruns on a specific energy market
project and manufacturing execution issues at one of the
Fabrication Groups facilities. Further, the Fabrication
Group experienced lower production capacity utilization and
increased operating inefficiencies, which in part were driven by
the ongoing delays in the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
program and global economic slowdown affecting the commercial
aerospace market, partially offset by reductions in
compensation, professional and consulting expenses during the
period.
27
The decrease in operating income for the Distribution Group was
largely due to lower demand in both the titanium and specialty
alloys markets. The lower demand resulted in decreased realized
selling prices for certain specialty metals that exceeded our
decline in product cost. This decrease was partially offset by a
decrease in compensation-related expenses and other cost
management actions, including the rationalization of our
domestic Distribution Group facilities.
Other Income (Expense). Other income (expense)
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was
$2.0 million and $(0.1) million, respectively. Other
income (expense) consists primarily of foreign exchange gains
and losses from our international operations and fair value
adjustments related to our foreign currency forward contracts.
Interest Income and Interest Expense. Interest
income for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008 was $1.3 million and $2.2 million, respectively.
The decrease was principally related to lower returns on
invested cash compared to the prior year period. Interest
expense was $12.0 million and $1.6 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The increase in interest expense in the current
year was due to higher average outstanding balances during the
current year, as well as a $4.9 million charge for the
termination of our interest rate swap agreements and a
$0.8 million write-off of deferred financing fees as a
result of the payoff of our $225 million term loan.
Provision for Income Taxes. We recognized a
provision for income taxes of $0.9 million, or (9.9)% of
pretax income, and $30.3 million, or 36.8% of pretax
income, for federal, state, and foreign income taxes for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Income tax for the current year to date period is
comprised entirely of discrete items of tax related to prior tax
years which are primarily attributable to current year
adjustments to unrecognized tax benefits and normal adjustments
for tax returns filed during the period. Discrete items
recognized during the nine month period ended September 30,
2008 were not material. The relationship between income tax
expense and reported results varied year over year primarily as
a result of the mix of domestic income and foreign losses
benefited at lower tax rates. The lower level of income
amplifies the rate impact of these mix effects in the current
period compared to the comparable prior period.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
In connection with our long-term mill product supply agreements
for the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) program and the
Airbus family of commercial aircraft, including the A380 and
A350XWB programs, we are undertaking several capital expansions.
During 2007, we announced plans to construct a premium-grade
titanium sponge facility in Hamilton, Mississippi, with
anticipated capital spending of approximately $300 million.
To date, we have spent approximately $60 million on this
project and have additional commitments of up to approximately
$40 million related to this project. In light of current
economic uncertainties, the overall softening within the
industry, our existing inventory of metallics, and the continued
delays in the production schedules of several of the programs
driving titanium demand, we have delayed the construction of
this facility. Based on the current long-term trends in the
supply market, we may adjust our expansion strategy relative to
the outsourcing of key raw materials, primarily titanium sponge,
in order to capitalize on more favorable costs and availability.
If we elect to continue to outsource our titanium sponge needs,
we expect that we will indefinitely delay the construction of
our previously announced titanium sponge plant, which would
result in a material asset impairment charge, and other
potential charges that may be incurred under contractual
obligations.
During 2007, we also announced plans to construct a new titanium
forging and rolling facility in Martinsville, Virginia, and new
melting facilities in Canton and Niles, Ohio, with anticipated
capital spending of approximately $100 million. While we
continually evaluate market conditions, we continue to move
forward with these projects and presently anticipate the
majority of the capital expenditures related to these facilities
to occur in 2009 and 2010. We expect that the Martinsville
facility will begin production in 2011 and will enable us to
enhance our throughput and shorten lead times on certain
products, primarily titanium sheet and plate.
28
On September 11, 2009, we sold 6.9 million shares of
our Common Stock through a public offering at $19.50 per share.
After the underwriters discount and other expenses of the
offering, we received net proceeds totaling $127.4 million.
We used the proceeds of the offering, in addition to our cash
and cash equivalents on hand, to repay all amounts outstanding
under our $225 million senior term loan (the Term
Loan), our credit facility between RTI Claro and National
City Banks Canada Branch (the Canadian
Facility), and our Canadian interest-free loan agreement.
On September 18, 2009, following the repayment of all
amounts outstanding under the Term Loan and the Canadian
Facility, we completed the first amendment (the
Amendment) to our Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement (the Credit Agreement). The Amendment
provides us with additional flexibility on the Interest Coverage
Ratio covenant of the Credit Agreement by excluding the interest
paid under the Term Loan and the Canadian Facility from the
calculation and provides additional flexibility on the Net Debt
to EBITDA ratio covenant by permitting certain charges to be
added back to net income for the purpose of determining EBITDA.
The Amendment also increased the margin added to both the base
interest rate and the LIBOR interest rate and increased the
facility fee. There were no additional changes to the covenants
under the Credit Agreement.
These financial covenants and ratios are described below:
|
|
|
|
|
Our leverage ratio (the ratio of Net Debt to Consolidated
EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Agreement) was 1.6 at
September 30, 2009. If this ratio were to exceed 3.25 to 1,
we would be in default of our Credit Agreement and our ability
to borrow under our Credit Agreement would be impaired.
|
|
|
|
Our interest coverage ratio (the ratio of Consolidated EBITDA to
Net Interest, as defined in the Credit Agreement) was 2.8 at
September 30, 2009. If this ratio were to fall below 2.0 to
1, we would be in default of our Credit Agreement and our
ability to borrow under the Credit Agreement would be impaired.
|
Consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Agreement, allows
for adjustments related to unusual gains and losses, certain
noncash items, and certain non-recurring charges. At
September 30, 2009, we were in compliance with our
financial covenants under the Credit Agreement.
While our current financial forecasts indicate we will maintain
our compliance with these covenants, certain events, some of
which are beyond our control, including further long-term delays
in the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
production schedule, the failure of one or more of our
significant customers to honor the terms of their
take-or-pay
contracts, and deeper reductions in global aircraft demand, may
cause us to be in default of one or more of these covenants in
the future. In the event of a default under our Credit
Agreement, absent a waiver from our lenders or an amendment to
our Credit Agreement, the interest rate on the Credit Agreement
could increase materially. Such a development could have a
material adverse impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements
if we were to borrow under the Credit Agreement. In addition, a
failure to maintain our financial covenants may impair our
ability to borrow under the Credit Agreement. If we default or
anticipate an expected future default under one or more of our
covenants, we will need to renegotiate our credit arrangements,
seek other sources of liquidity, or both.
Provided we continue to meet our financial covenants under the
Credit Agreement, we expect that our cash and cash equivalents
and our undrawn $200 million revolving credit facility will
provide us sufficient liquidity to meet our operating needs and
capital expansion plans.
Cash provided by operating activities. Cash
provided by operating activities for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $16.7 million and
$53.2 million, respectively. This decrease is primarily due
to the decrease in our net income for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, partially offset by improvements in our
working capital, primarily driven by improvements in accounts
receivable and inventory.
Cash used in investing activities. Cash used
in investing activities for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $63.4 million and
$88.8 million, respectively. This spending reflects our
continued investments related to our major capital expansion
projects.
29
Cash provided by (used in) financing
activities. Cash provided by (used in) financing
activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008 was $(114.7) million and $219.0 million,
respectively. Financing activities utilized cash in 2009 as a
result of our repayment of all outstanding amounts, totaling
$243.4 million, under our Term Loan, Canadian Credit
Facility, and Canadian interest-free loan agreement, partially
offset by the $127.4 million received from our equity
offering. Financing activities were a source of cash in 2008 as
we borrowed funds under the Term Loan, partially offset by the
$9.0 million purchase of 176,976 shares of RTI Common
Stock.
Duty
Drawback Investigation
We maintained a program through an authorized agent to recapture
duty paid on imported titanium sponge as an offset against
exports for products shipped outside the U.S. by the
Company or its customers. The agent, who matched the
Companys duty paid with the export shipments through
filings with the U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(U.S. Customs), performed the recapture process.
Historically, the Company recognized a credit to Cost of Sales
when it received notification from its agent that a claim had
been filed and received by U.S. Customs. For the period
January 1, 2001 through March 31, 2007, the Company
recognized a reduction to Cost of Sales totaling
$14.5 million associated with the recapture of duty paid.
This amount represents the total of all claims filed by the
agent on the Companys behalf.
During 2007, the Company received notice from U.S. Customs
that it was under formal investigation with respect to
$7.6 million of claims previously filed by the agent on the
Companys behalf. The investigation relates to
discrepancies in, and lack of supporting documentation for,
claims filed through the Companys authorized agent. The
Company revoked the authorized agents authority and is
fully cooperating with U.S. Customs to determine the extent
to which any claims may be invalid or may not be supportable
with adequate documentation. In response to the investigation
noted above, the Company suspended the filing of new duty
drawback claims through the third quarter of 2007. The Company
is fully engaged and cooperating with U.S. Customs in an
effort to complete the investigation in an expeditious manner.
Concurrent with the U.S. Customs investigation, we
performed an internal review of the entire $14.5 million of
drawback claims filed with U.S. Customs to determine to
what extent any claims may have been invalid or may not have
been supported with adequate documentation. As a result of this
review, we recorded charges totaling $8.0 million to Cost
of Sales through December 31, 2008. We recorded additional
charges totaling $0.2 million and $2.3 million during
the three months ended March 31, 2009 and June 30,
2009, respectively. No additional charges were recorded during
the three months ended September 30, 2009. The
$2.3 million charge during the three months ended
June 30, 2009 resulted from the receipt of formal notice
from U.S. Customs in June 2009 indicating that they had
denied certain of the Companys previously filed duty
drawback claims. The $2.3 million charge represents 100% of
the denied claims. While the Company has reserved the right to
formally protest the denial of these claims, the inherent risks
and uncertainties of the protest process make it probable that
it will ultimately be required to reimburse U.S. Customs
for the value of these denied claims.
These abovementioned charges represent the Companys
current best estimate of probable loss. Of this amount,
$9.5 million was recorded as a contingent current liability
and $1.0 million was recorded as a write-off of an
outstanding receivable representing claims filed which had not
yet been paid by U.S. Customs. Through December 31,
2008, the Company repaid to U.S. Customs $1.1 million
for invalid claims. The Company made additional repayments
totaling $0.3 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. As a result of these payments, the
Companys liability totaled $8.0 million as of
September 30, 2009. While the Companys internal
investigation into these claims is complete, there is not a
timetable of which the Company is aware for when
U.S. Customs will conclude its investigation.
While the ultimate outcome of the U.S. Customs
investigation is not yet known, the Company believes there is an
additional possible risk of loss between $0 and
$3.0 million based on current facts, exclusive of amounts
imposed for interest and penalties, if any, which cannot be
quantified at this time. This possible risk
30
of future loss relates primarily to indirect duty drawback
claims filed with U.S. Customs by several of our customers
as the ultimate exporter of record in which we shared in a
portion of the revenue.
Backlog
The Companys order backlog for all markets was
approximately $288 million as of September 30, 2009,
as compared to $400 million at December 31, 2008. Of
the backlog at September 30, 2009, approximately
$92 million is likely to be realized over the remainder of
2009. We define backlog as firm business scheduled for release
into our production process for a specific delivery date. We
have numerous requirement contracts that extend multiple years,
including the Airbus, JSF and Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
long-term supply agreements, that are not included in backlog
until a specific release into production or a firm delivery date
has been established.
Environmental
Matters
We are subject to environmental laws and regulations as well as
various health and safety laws and regulations that are subject
to frequent modifications and revisions. While the costs of
compliance for these matters have not had a material adverse
impact on the Company in the past, it is not possible to
accurately predict the ultimate effect these changing laws and
regulations may have on the Company in the future. We continue
to evaluate our obligation for environmental-related costs on a
quarterly basis and make adjustments as necessary.
Given the status of the proceedings at certain of our sites and
the evolving nature of environmental laws, regulations, and
remediation techniques, our ultimate obligation for
investigative and remediation costs cannot be predicted. It is
our policy to recognize environmental costs in the financial
statements when an obligation becomes probable and a reasonable
estimate of exposure can be determined. When a single estimate
cannot be reasonably made, but a range can be reasonably
estimated, we accrue the amount we determine to be the most
likely amount within that range.
Based on available information, we believe our share of possible
environmental-related costs is in a range from $0.9 million
to $2.4 million in the aggregate. At September 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008, the amounts accrued for future
environmental-related costs were $1.5 million and
$2.3 million, respectively. Of the total amount accrued at
September 30, 2009, $1.3 million is expected to be
paid out within the next twelve months and is included in the
other accrued liabilities line of the balance sheet. The
remaining $0.2 million recorded in other noncurrent
liabilities. During the nine months ended September 30,
2009, we made payments totaling $0.8 million related to our
environmental liabilities.
As these proceedings continue toward final resolution, amounts
in excess of those already provided may be necessary to
discharge us from our obligations for these sites, which include
the Ashtabula River and the Reserve Environmental Services
Landfill.
New
Accounting Standards
In December 2007, the FASB revised the authoritative guidance
for business combinations. The revised guidance establishes
principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and
measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest
in the acquiree, and the goodwill acquired. The revised guidance
also establishes additional disclosure requirements related to
the financial effects of a business combination. The revised
guidance became effective as of January 1, 2009. The
adoption of the revised guidance did not have a material effect
on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued authoritative guidance
establishing accounting and reporting standards for ownership
interest in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent,
the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent
and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parents
ownership interest, and the valuation of retained noncontrolling
equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. The
guidance also establishes disclosure requirements that clearly
identify and distinguish between the interest of the parent and
the interests of the noncontrolling owners. The guidance became
effective as of January 1, 2009. The adoption of the new
guidance did not have a material effect on our Consolidated
Financial Statements.
31
In March 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which
provided for additional disclosure requirements for derivative
instruments and hedging activities, including disclosures as to
how and why a company uses derivative instruments, how
derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted
for and how derivative instruments and related hedged items
affect a companys financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows. The new guidance became effective
as of January 1, 2009. The adoption of the new guidance did
not have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In June 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which
clarified that unvested share-based payment awards that contain
nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents,
whether paid or unpaid, are participating securities to be
included in the computation of earnings per share under the
two-class method. The new guidance became effective as of
January 1, 2009, and required retrospective application.
The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact
on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2008, the FASB issued revised authoritative guidance
which requires additional disclosures about the plan assets of
an employers defined benefit or other postretirement plan,
to include investment policies and strategies; associated and
concentrated risks; major asset categories and their fair
values; inputs and valuation techniques used to measure
fair-value of plan assets; and the net periodic benefit costs
recognized for each annual period. The revised guidance is
effective for reporting periods ending after December 15,
2009. We are currently evaluating the potential impact the
adoption of the revised guidance will have on our Consolidated
Financial Statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance requiring
disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim
financial statements as well as in annual financial statements.
The new guidance became effective for interim reporting periods
ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of the new
guidance did not have a material effect on our Consolidated
Financial Statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance establishing
general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events
that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial
statements are issued or are available to be issued and
disclosure of the date through which subsequent events have been
evaluated. The new guidance became effective for interim
reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption
of the new guidance did not have a material impact on our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that
identifies the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the
Codification) as the sole source of U.S. GAAP
recognized by the FASB. The Codification identifies only two
levels of GAAP: authoritative and nonauthoritative. The new
guidance became effective for interim periods ending after
September 15, 2009. We are utilizing the plain-English
method for disclosures when referencing accounting standards.
The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material effect
on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
|
There have been no significant changes in our exposure to market
risk from the information provided in Item 7A. Quantitative
Disclosures about Market Risk on our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed with the SEC on February 18, 2009.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures.
|
As of September 30, 2009, an evaluation was performed under
the supervision and with the participation of the Companys
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Companys
management concluded that the Companys disclosure controls
and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2009.
There were no changes in the Companys internal control
over financial reporting during the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 that materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting.
32
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Our business is subject to various risks and uncertainties. Any
of these individual risks described below, or any number of
these risks occurring simultaneously, could have a material
effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements, business or
results of operation. You should carefully consider these
factors, as well as the other information contained in this
document, when evaluating your investment in our securities.
We are
subject to risks associated with global economic and political
uncertainties
Like other companies, we are susceptible to macroeconomic
downturns in the United States and abroad that may affect our
performance and the performance of our customers and suppliers.
Further, the global financial crisis may have an impact on our
business and financial condition in ways that we currently
cannot predict. The credit crisis and related turmoil in the
global financial system has had and may continue to have an
impact on our business and our financial condition. In addition
to the impact that the global financial crisis has already had,
we may face significant financial and operational challenges if
conditions in the financial markets do not improve or continue
to worsen. For example, an extension of the credit crisis to
other industries (for example, the availability of financing for
the purchase of commercial aircraft) could adversely impact
overall demand for our products, which could have a negative
effect on our revenues. In addition, our ability to access the
traditional bank and capital markets may be severely restricted,
which could have an adverse impact on our ability to react to
changing economic and business conditions.
In addition, we are subject to various domestic and
international risks and uncertainties, including changing social
conditions and uncertainties relating to the current and future
political climate. Changes in policy resulting from the new
Presidential administration could have an adverse effect on the
financial condition and the level of business activity of the
defense industry or other market segments in which we
participate. This may reduce our customers demand for our
products
and/or
depress pricing of those products, resulting in a material
adverse impact on our business, prospects, results of
operations, revenues, and cash flows.
A
significant amount of our future revenue is based on long-term
contracts for new aircraft programs
We have signed several long-term contracts in recent years to
produce titanium mill products and complex engineered assemblies
for several new aircraft programs, including the Boeing 787,
Lockheed Martins F-35 Joint Strike Fighter or
JSF, and the Airbus family of aircraft, including
the A380 and the A350XWB. In order to meet the delivery
requirements of these contracts, we have invested in significant
capital expansion projects. Because of the current global
economic slowdown and production problems experienced by many of
our customers, we have experienced significant delays in these
programs. Further delays or program cancellations could have a
material adverse impact on our business, prospects, results of
operations, revenues, cash flows, and financial standing. In
addition, several of our customer contracts are
take-or-pay
contracts that require our customers to take a minimum amount of
product in a period. As program delays continue, some of our
customers may not meet their contractual minimum amount of
product. While we intend to bill these customers for their
contractual minimum amount, if they fail to pay as required by
their contracts, we may suffer a material adverse impact on our
liquidity and results of operations.
The
ability to successfully expand our operations in a timely and
cost effective manner
In connection with several of our long-term commercial
contracts, we have undertaken several major capital expansion
projects which are currently estimated to continue through 2011,
including the construction of our new titanium sponge plant and
titanium rolling mill and forging press facilities. Construction
of the sponge plant has been delayed because of the current
global economic slowdown, and may be further delayed, idled, or
abandoned. Our inability to successfully complete the
construction of these facilities in a timely and cost effective
manner, or at all, or obtain titanium sponge (our principle raw
material) from an alternative source, could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations. If we were to indefinitely delay or abandon the
construction of the sponge plant, we could suffer an adverse
effect on our liquidity. Further, our undertaking of these
significant initiatives places a significant demand on
33
management, financial, and operational resources. Our success in
these projects will depend upon the ability of key financial and
operational management to ensure the necessary internal and
external resources are in place to properly complete and operate
these facilities.
We may
be affected by our ability or inability to obtain
financing
Our ability to access the traditional bank or capital markets in
the future for additional financing, if needed, and our future
financial performance could be influenced by our ability to meet
current covenant requirements associated with our existing
credit agreement, our credit rating, or other factors.
The
demand for our products and services may be adversely affected
by demand for our customers products and
services
Our business is substantially derived from titanium mill
products and fabricated metal parts, which are primarily used by
our customers as components in the manufacture of their
products. The ability or inability to meet our financial
expectations could be directly impacted by our customers
abilities or inabilities to meet their own financial
expectations. A continued downturn in demand for our
customers products and services could occur for reasons
beyond their control such as unforeseen spending constraints,
competitive pressures, rising prices, the inability to contain
costs, and other domestic as well as global economic,
environmental or political factors. A continued slowdown in
demand by or complete loss of business from these customers
could have a material impact on our results of operations and
financial position, including, but not limited to, impairment of
goodwill, which could be material.
A
substantial amount of revenue is derived from the commercial
aerospace and defense industries and a limited number of
customers
More than 80% of our annual revenue is derived from the
commercial aerospace and defense industries. Within those
industries are a relatively small number of consumers of
titanium products. Those industries have historically been
highly cyclical, resulting in the potential for sudden and
dramatic changes in expected production and spending that, as a
partner in the supply chain, can negatively impact our
operational plans and, ultimately, the demand for our products
and services. Some of our customers are particularly sensitive
to the level of government spending on defense-related products.
Government programs are dependent upon the continued
availability of appropriations which are approved on an annual
basis. Sudden reductions in defense spending could occur due to
economic or political changes which could result in a downturn
in demand for defense-related titanium products. In addition,
changes to existing defense procurement laws and regulations,
such as the domestic preference for specialty metals, could
adversely affect our results of operations. Many of our
customers are dependent on the commercial airline industry which
has shown to be subject to significant economic and political
challenges due to threats or acts of terrorism, rising or
volatile fuel costs, pandemics, or other outbreaks of infectious
diseases, aggressive competition, global economic slowdown, and
other factors. In addition, new aerospace and defense platforms
under which we have a contract to supply our products may be
subject to production delays which would affect the timing of
the delivery of our products for such platforms. Any one or
combination of these factors could occur suddenly and result in
a reduction or cancellation in orders of new airplanes and parts
which could have an adverse impact on our business. Neither the
Company nor its customers may be able to project or plan in a
timely manner for the impact of these events.
We may
be subject to competitive pressures
The titanium metals industry is highly competitive on a
worldwide basis. Our competitors are located primarily in the
U.S., Japan, Russia, Europe, and China. Our Russian competitor,
in particular, has significantly greater capacity than us and
others in our industry. Not only do we face competition for a
limited number of customers with other producers of titanium
products, but we also must compete with producers of other
generally less expensive materials of construction including
stainless steel, nickel-based high temperature and corrosion
resistant alloys, and composites.
Our competitors could experience more favorable operating
conditions than us including lower raw materials costs, more
favorable labor agreements, or other factors which could provide
them with competitive
34
cost advantages in their ability to provide goods and services.
Changes in costs or other factors related to the production and
supply of titanium mill products compared to costs or other
factors related to the production and supply of other types of
materials of construction may negatively impact our business and
the industry as a whole. New competitive forces unknown to us
today could also emerge which could have an adverse impact on
our financial performance. Our foreign competitors in particular
may have the ability to offer goods and services to our
customers at more favorable prices due to advantageous economic,
environmental, political, or other factors.
We may
experience a lack of supply of raw materials at costs that
provide us with acceptable margin levels
The raw materials required for the production of titanium mill
products (primarily titanium sponge and scrap) are acquired from
a number of domestic and foreign suppliers. Although we have
long-term contracts in place for the procurement of certain
amounts of raw material and have begun the process of
constructing a titanium sponge plant (which has been delayed due
to the current global economy), we cannot guarantee that our
suppliers can fulfill their contractual obligations nor can we
guarantee that the construction of our sponge plant will not be
further delayed, idled, or abandoned due to the global economic
slowdown or other circumstances. Our suppliers may be adversely
impacted by events within or outside of their control that may
adversely affect our business operations. We cannot guarantee
that we will be able to obtain adequate amounts of raw materials
from other suppliers in the event that our primary suppliers are
unable to meet our needs. We may experience an increase in
prices for raw materials which could have a negative impact on
our profit margins if we are unable to adequately increase
product pricing, and we may not be able to project the impact
that an increase in costs may cause in a timely manner. We may
be contractually obligated to supply products to our customers
at price levels that do not result in our expected margins due
to unanticipated increases in the costs of raw materials. We may
experience dramatic increases in demand and we cannot guarantee
that we will be able to obtain adequate levels of raw materials
at prices that are within acceptable cost parameters in order to
fulfill that demand.
We are
subject to changes in product pricing
The titanium industry is highly cyclical. Consequently, excess
supply and competition may periodically result in fluctuations
in the prices at which we are able to sell certain of our
products. Price reductions may have a negative impact on our
operating results. In addition, our ability to implement price
increases is dependent on market conditions, often beyond our
control. Given the long manufacturing lead times for certain
products, the realization of financial benefits from increased
prices may be delayed.
We may
experience a shortage in the supply of energy or an increase in
energy costs to operate our plants
We own twenty-four natural gas wells which provide some but not
all of the non-electrical energy required by our Niles, Ohio
operations. Because our operations are reliant on energy sources
from outside suppliers, we may experience significant increases
in electricity and natural gas prices, unavailability of
electrical power, natural gas, or other resources due to natural
disasters, interruptions in energy supplies due to equipment
failure or other causes, or the inability to extend expiring
energy supply contracts on favorable economical terms.
Our
business could be harmed by strikes or work
stoppages
Approximately 350 hourly, clerical and technical employees
at our Niles, Ohio facility are represented by the United
Steelworkers of America. Our current labor agreement with this
union expires June 30, 2013. Approximately 160 hourly
employees at our RTI Tradco facility in Washington, Missouri are
represented by the International Association of Machinists and
Aerospace Workers. Our current labor agreement with this union
expires February 19, 2011.
We cannot be certain that we will be able to negotiate new
bargaining agreements upon expiration of the existing agreements
on the same or more favorable terms as the current agreements,
or at all, without production interruptions caused by a labor
stoppage. If a strike or work stoppage were to occur in
connection with the negotiation of a new collective bargaining
agreement, or as a result of a dispute under our collective
35
bargaining agreements with the labor unions, our business,
financial condition and results of operations could be
materially adversely affected.
Our
business is subject to the risks of international
operations
We operate subsidiaries and conduct business with suppliers and
customers in foreign countries which exposes us to risks
associated with international business activities. We could be
significantly impacted by those risks, which include the
potential for volatile economic and labor conditions, political
instability, expropriation, and changes in taxes, tariffs, and
other regulatory costs. We are also exposed to and can be
adversely affected by fluctuations in the exchange rate of the
United States Dollar against other foreign currencies,
particularly the Canadian Dollar, the Euro and the British
Pound. Although we are operating primarily in countries with
relatively stable economic and political climates, there can be
no assurance that our business will not be adversely affected by
those risks inherent to international operations.
We are
dependent on services that are subject to price and availability
fluctuations
We often depend on third parties to provide outside material
processing services that may be critical to the manufacture of
our products. Purchase prices and availability of these services
are subject to volatility. At any given time, we may be unable
to obtain these critical services on a timely basis, at
acceptable prices or on other acceptable terms, if at all.
Further, if an outside processor is unable to produce to
required specifications, our additional cost to cure may
negatively impact our margins.
Our
success depends largely on our ability to attract and retain key
personnel
Much of our future success depends on the continued service and
availability of skilled personnel, including members of our
executive team, management, materials engineers and other
technical specialists, and staff positions. The loss of key
personnel could adversely affect our Companys ability to
perform until suitable replacements are found. There can be no
assurance that the Company will be able to continue to
successfully attract and retain key personnel.
The
demand for our products and services may be affected by factors
outside of our control
War, terrorism, natural disasters, and public health issues
including pandemics, whether in the U.S. or abroad, have
caused and could cause damage or disruption to international
commerce by creating economic and political uncertainties that
may have a negative impact on the global economy as a whole. Our
business operations, as well as our suppliers and
customers business operations, are subject to interruption
by those factors as well as other events beyond our control such
as governmental regulations, fire, power shortages, and others.
Although it is impossible to predict the occurrences or
consequences of any such events, they could result in a decrease
in demand for the Companys products, make it difficult or
impossible for us to deliver products to our customers or to
receive materials from our suppliers, and create delays and
inefficiencies in our supply chain. Our operating results and
financial condition may be adversely affected by these events.
The
outcome of the U.S. Customs investigation of our previously
filed duty drawback claims is uncertain
During 2007, the Company received notice from U.S. Customs
indicating that certain duty drawback claims previously filed by
the Companys agent, on behalf of the Company, are under
formal investigation. The investigation relates to discrepancies
in, and lack of supporting documentation for, claims filed
through the Companys prior drawback broker. For additional
detail regarding this investigation, see Duty Drawback
Investigation in Item 3. Legal Proceedings, in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008. The ultimate outcome
of the U.S. Customs investigation cannot be determined,
however, the outcome of this investigation could have an adverse
impact on our financial performance.
We are
subject to, and could incur substantial costs and liabilities
under, environmental, health and safety laws
We own
and/or
operate a number of manufacturing and other facilities. Our
operations and properties are subject to various laws and
regulations relating to the protection of the environment and
health and safety matters, including those governing the
discharge of pollutants into the air and water, the management
and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, and the cleanup
of contaminated sites. Some environmental laws
36
can impose liability for all of the costs of a contaminated site
without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct.
We could incur substantial costs, including fines, penalties,
civil and criminal sanctions, investigation and cleanup costs,
natural resource damages and third-party claims for property
damage or personal injury, as a result of violations of or
liabilities under environmental laws and regulations or the
environmental permits required for our operations. Many of our
properties have a history of industrial operations, including
the use and storage of hazardous materials, and we are involved
in remedial actions relating to some of our current and former
properties and, along with other responsible parties,
third-party sites. We have established reserves for such matters
where appropriate. The ultimate costs of cleanup, and our share
of such costs, however, are difficult to accurately predict and
could exceed current reserves. We also could incur significant
additional costs at these or other sites if additional
contamination is discovered, additional cleanup obligations are
imposed
and/or the
participation or financial viability of other responsible
parties changes in the future. In addition, while the cost of
complying with environmental laws and regulations has not had a
material adverse impact on our operations in the past, such laws
and regulations are subject to frequent modifications and
revisions, and more stringent compliance requirements, or more
stringent interpretation or enforcement of existing
requirements, may be imposed in the future on us or the
industries in which we operate. As a result, we could incur
significant additional costs complying with environmental laws
and regulations in the future.
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
|
The Company may repurchase shares of Common Stock under the RTI
International Metals, Inc. share repurchase program approved by
the Companys Board of Directors on April 30, 1999,
and which authorizes the repurchase of up to $15 million of
RTI Common Stock. No shares were repurchased under this program
during the three months ended September 30, 2009. At
September 30, 2009, approximately $3 million of the
$15 million remained available for repurchase. There is no
expiration date specified for the share repurchase program.
In addition to the share repurchase program, employees may
surrender shares to the Company to pay tax liabilities
associated with the vesting of restricted stock awards under the
2004 Stock Plan. There were no shares of Common Stock
surrendered to satisfy tax liabilities during the three months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
The exhibits listed on the Index to Exhibits are filed herewith
and incorporated herein by reference.
37
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC.
William T. Hull
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(principal accounting officer)
Dated: November 5, 2009
38
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
First Amendment to First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement,
dated September 18, 2009, filed herewith.
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by
Item 307 of
Regulation S-K
as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and
pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
filed herewith.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer required by
Item 307 of
Regulation S-K
as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and
pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
filed herewith.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed
herewith.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed
herewith.
|
39