e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-12014
POWERSECURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
84-1169358
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1609 Heritage Commerce Court
Wake Forest, North Carolina
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
27587
(Zip code) |
(919) 556-3056
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Act). Yes o No þ
As of May 5, 2010, 18,250,041 shares of the issuers Common Stock were outstanding.
POWERSECURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
POWERSECURE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Assets |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
16,613 |
|
|
$ |
20,169 |
|
Trade receivables, net of allowance for
doubtful accounts
of $281 and $299, respectively |
|
|
29,554 |
|
|
|
28,332 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
26,007 |
|
|
|
21,632 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
2,713 |
|
|
|
2,713 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
75,937 |
|
|
|
74,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment |
|
|
23,328 |
|
|
|
22,252 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
Land, building and improvements |
|
|
4,813 |
|
|
|
4,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment, at cost |
|
|
28,809 |
|
|
|
27,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
5,909 |
|
|
|
5,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
22,900 |
|
|
|
22,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
7,256 |
|
|
|
7,256 |
|
Restricted annuity contract |
|
|
2,242 |
|
|
|
2,220 |
|
Intangible rights and capitalized software
costs, net of
accumulated amortization of $1,999 and
$1,890, respectively |
|
|
1,498 |
|
|
|
1,320 |
|
Investment in unconsolidated affiliate |
|
|
4,177 |
|
|
|
3,974 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
15,386 |
|
|
|
15,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
114,223 |
|
|
$ |
111,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
POWERSECURE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
9,420 |
|
|
$ |
4,116 |
|
Accrued and other liabilities |
|
|
16,926 |
|
|
|
20,379 |
|
Restructuring charges payable |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
Current income taxes payable |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current unrecognized tax benefit |
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations |
|
|
766 |
|
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
27,623 |
|
|
|
25,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilites: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving line of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion |
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
|
4,445 |
|
Unrecognized tax benefit |
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
|
1,169 |
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
804 |
|
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities |
|
|
6,223 |
|
|
|
6,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PowerSecure International stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock undesignated, $.01 par value; 2,000,000 shares
authorized; none issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock Series C, $.01 par value; 500,000 shares
authorized; none issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; 25,000,000 shares
authorized; 17,222,464 and 17,241,650 shares issued
and outstanding, respectively |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
111,243 |
|
|
|
110,911 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(31,734 |
) |
|
|
(32,951 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total PowerSecure International, Inc. stockholders equity |
|
|
79,681 |
|
|
|
78,132 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
1,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
80,377 |
|
|
|
79,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
114,223 |
|
|
$ |
111,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
POWERSECURE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
24,674 |
|
|
$ |
19,720 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
15,083 |
|
|
|
13,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
9,591 |
|
|
|
5,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
7,326 |
|
|
|
6,040 |
|
Selling, marketing and service |
|
|
1,053 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
9,036 |
|
|
|
7,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
(1,539 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income and (expenses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity income |
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
Management fees |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
Interest income and other income |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
1,630 |
|
|
|
(1,078 |
) |
Income tax provision |
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
1,404 |
|
|
|
(1,102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to PowerSecure
International, Inc. |
|
$ |
1,217 |
|
|
$ |
(1,136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to
PowerSecure International, Inc. common stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
17,237 |
|
|
|
17,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
17,692 |
|
|
|
17,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
POWERSECURE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,404 |
|
|
$ |
(1,102 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
542 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
Noncontrolling interest distributions to minority member |
|
|
(598 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of miscellaneous assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliate |
|
|
(1,030 |
) |
|
|
(477 |
) |
Distributions from unconsolidated affiliate |
|
|
809 |
|
|
|
607 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of
effect of aquisitons: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables, net |
|
|
(1,222 |
) |
|
|
4,855 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(4,375 |
) |
|
|
(820 |
) |
Other current assets and liabilities |
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
606 |
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
5,304 |
|
|
|
(2,059 |
) |
Restructuring charges |
|
|
(248 |
) |
|
|
(499 |
) |
Accrued and other liabilities |
|
|
(3,453 |
) |
|
|
(2,583 |
) |
Deferred compensation obligation |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Restricted annuity contract |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(1,805 |
) |
|
|
(499 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(1,129 |
) |
|
|
(582 |
) |
Additions to intangible rights and software development |
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(1,404 |
) |
|
|
(648 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings (payments) on revolving line of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
(175 |
) |
Proceeds from stock option and warrant exercises, net of shares tendered |
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by financing activities |
|
|
(347 |
) |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(3,556 |
) |
|
|
(1,363 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR |
|
|
20,169 |
|
|
|
24,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
16,613 |
|
|
$ |
22,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
POWERSECURE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and
For the Three Month Periods Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(in thousands, except per share data)
1. Description of Business and Basis of Presentation
Description of Business
PowerSecure International, Inc., headquartered in Wake Forest, North Carolina, is a leading
provider of Energy and Smart Grid Solutions to electric utilities, their commercial, institutional
and industrial customers, and of Energy Services to oil and natural gas producers. We provide
these customers with products and services in four strategic business areas:
|
|
|
Interactive Distributed Generation, |
|
|
|
|
Utility Infrastructure, |
|
|
|
|
Energy Efficiency, and |
|
|
|
|
Energy Services. |
Our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment is operated through our largest wholly-owned
subsidiary PowerSecure, Inc., which we refer to as our PowerSecure subsidiary. This segment
includes three of our four strategic business areas: Interactive Distributed Generation, Utility
Infrastructure and Energy Efficiency. These three areas are focused on providing utilities and
their commercial, institutional and industrial customers with products and services to help them
generate, deliver, and utilize electricity more efficiently and are intended to deliver strong
returns on investment. These three business areas share common or complementary utility
relationships and customer categories, common sales and overhead resources, and facilities.
However, each area in this segment possesses distinct technical disciplines and specific
capabilities that are designed to provide a competitive advantage in the marketplace for its
specific products and services, including that areas personnel, technology, engineering, and
intellectual capital. This segment operates primarily out of our Wake Forest, North Carolina
headquarters office, and its operations also include several satellite office and manufacturing
facilities, the largest of which are in Raleigh, North Carolina, McDonough, Georgia, and Anderson,
South Carolina. The locations of our sales organization for this segment are generally in close
proximity to the utilities and commercial, industrial, and institutional customers they serve.
Our Energy Services segment is operated through our two other principal operating
subsidiaries, Southern Flow Companies, Inc., which we refer to as Southern Flow, and WaterSecure
Holdings, Inc., which we refer to as WaterSecure. Our Southern Flow business provides oil and
natural gas measurement services to customers involved in oil and natural gas production,
transportation, and processing, with a focus on the natural gas market. Southern Flow is
headquartered in Lafayette, Louisiana, and provides these services through ten division offices
located throughout the Gulf of Mexico, Southwest, Midwest and Rocky Mountain regions. WaterSecure
owns approximately 40% of the equity interests in an unconsolidated business, Marcum Midstream
1995-2 Business Trust, which we refer to as MM 1995-2 or as our WaterSecure operations. Our
WaterSecure operations provide water processing and disposal services for oil and natural gas producers in northeastern
Colorado utilizing
7
environmentally responsible technologies and processes.
See Note 11 for more information concerning our reportable segments.
Basis of Presentation
Organization The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
PowerSecure International, Inc. and its subsidiaries, primarily, PowerSecure, Inc. (our
PowerSecure subsidiary) (and its majority-owned and wholly-owned subsidiaries, UtilityEngineering,
Inc., PowerServices, Inc., EnergyLite, Inc., EfficientLights, LLC, Reids Trailer, Inc. and
PowerPackages, LLC), Southern Flow Companies, Inc. (Southern Flow), WaterSecure Holdings, Inc.
(WaterSecure), and Marcum Gas Metering, Inc. (fka Metretek International, Inc. and Metretek,
Incorporated) (Metretek Florida), collectively referred to as the Company or we or us or
our.
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to rules and regulations
of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The accompanying consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
In managements opinion, all adjustments (all of which are normal and recurring) have been
made which are necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial position of us and
our subsidiaries as of March 31, 2010 and the consolidated results of our operations and cash flows
for the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009.
Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
PowerSecure International, Inc. and its subsidiaries after elimination of intercompany accounts and
transactions. We use the equity method to account for our investment in our unconsolidated
affiliate.
Noncontrolling Interest in EfficientLights Through March 31, 2010, our PowerSecure
subsidiary held a 67% controlling ownership interest in EfficientLights which is consolidated in
our financial statements. The 33% noncontrolling ownership interest in the income of
EfficientLights is included as a reduction to net income (loss) to derive income (loss)
attributable to PowerSecure International shareholders in our consolidated statement of operations.
The 33% noncontrolling ownership interest in the equity of EfficientLights is shown as a separate
component of stockholders equity in our consolidated balance sheet. On April 30, 2010, we
acquired the 33% noncontrolling ownership interest in EfficientLights, so thereafter we will not
take any reduction to net income (loss) to derive the income (loss) attributable to PowerSecure
International shareholders in our consolidated statement of operations. See further information
regarding our acquisition of the noncontrolling interest in EfficientLights at Note 10.
Use of Estimates The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires that our
management make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates include percentage-of-completion
estimates for revenue and cost of sales recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts receivable,
inventory valuation reserves, warranty reserves and our deferred tax valuation allowance.
8
Reclassifications Certain 2009 amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year
presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on net income or loss or stockholders equity.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Standards
Revenue Recognition For our distributed generation turn-key project-based sales and our
utility infrastructure projects, we recognize revenue and profit as work progresses using the
percentage-of-completion method, which relies on various estimates. We believe the use of the
percentage-of-completion method of accounting for our distributed generation projects is preferable
to the completed contract method because a typical distributed generation construction project
occurs over several accounting periods and the percentage-of-completion method is a better method
to match the revenues and costs to the reporting period in which the construction services are
performed. Nearly all of our distributed generation projects are fixed-price contracts, with the
exception of certain contracts which provide for additional billings based on wire usage to connect
the distributed generation equipment to customer facilities.
In applying the percentage-of-completion method to our distributed generation turn-key
projects, we have identified the key output project phases that are standard components of our
construction projects. We have further identified, based on past experience, an estimate of the
value of each of these output phases based on a combination of costs incurred and the value added
to the overall construction project. While the order of these phases varies depending on the
project, each of these output phases is necessary to complete each project and each phase is an
integral part of the turnkey product solution we deliver to our customers. We use these output
phases and percentages to measure our progress toward completion of our construction projects. For
each reporting period, the status of each project, by phase, is determined by employees who are
managers of or are otherwise directly involved with the constructions project and is reviewed by
our accounting personnel. Utilizing this information, we recognize project revenues (and
associated project costs) and gross profit based on the percentage associated with output phases
that are complete or in process on each of our projects.
In applying the percentage-of-completion method to our utility infrastructure projects, sales
and gross profit are recognized as work is performed based on the relationship between actual costs
incurred and total estimated costs at completion.
In all cases where we utilize the percentage-of-completion, revenues and gross profit are
adjusted prospectively for revisions in estimated total contract costs and contract values.
Estimated losses, if any, are recorded when identified. While a project is in process, amounts
billed to customers in excess of revenues recognized to date are classified as current liabilities.
Likewise, amounts recognized as revenue in excess of actual billings to date are recorded as
unbilled accounts receivable. In the event a contract provides for adjustments to the contract
price for actual wire or other raw material usage, we recognize the associated revenue when the
actual costs are incurred and the customer is billed.
Because the percentage-of-completion method of accounting relies upon estimates described
above, recognized revenues and profits are subject to revision as a project progresses to
completion. Revisions in profit estimates are charged to income in the period in which the facts
that give rise to the revision become known. In the event we were required to adjust any
particular projects estimated revenues or costs, the effect on the current period earnings may or
may not be insignificant. If, however, conditions arise that requires us to adjust our estimated
revenues or costs for a series of similar construction projects, the effect on current period
earnings would more likely be significant. In addition,
certain contracts provide for cancellation provisions prior to completion of a project. The
cancellation
9
provisions generally provide for payment of costs incurred, but may result in an
adjustment to profit already recognized in a prior period.
We recognize equipment and product revenue when persuasive evidence of a non-cancelable
arrangement exists, delivery has occurred and/or services have been rendered, the price is fixed or
determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Equipment and product sales are generally
made directly to end users of the product, who are responsible for payment for the product.
Service revenue includes regulatory consulting and rate design services, power system
engineering services, energy conservation services, chart services, field services, laboratory
analysis, data management services, and monitoring and maintenance services. Revenues from these
services are recognized when the service is performed and the customer has accepted the work.
Revenues on our recurring revenue distributed generation projects are recognized over the term
of the contract as we provide utilities and their customers with access to distributed generation
systems we own for standby power and peak shaving or, in certain cases, when energy savings are
realized by the customer at their site. These contracts can involve multiple parties, with one
party paying us for the value of backup power (usually, but not always, a commercial, industrial,
or institutional customer), and one party paying us for the value of the electrical capacity
provided by the system (usually a utility).
Sales of certain goods or services sometimes involve the provision of multiple elements.
Revenues from contracts with multiple element arrangements are recognized as each element is earned
based on the relative fair value of each element and when the delivered elements have value to
customers on a standalone basis. Amounts allocated to each element are based on its objectively
determined fair value, such as the sales price for the product or service when it is sold
separately or competitor prices for similar products or services.
Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three
months or less from the date of purchase, including money market mutual funds, short-term time
deposits, and government agency and corporate obligations, are classified as cash and cash
equivalents.
Concentration of Credit Risk We are subject to concentrations of credit risk from our cash
and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. We limit our exposure to credit risk associated with
cash and cash equivalents by placing our cash and cash equivalents with multiple domestic financial
institutions. Nevertheless, our cash in bank deposit accounts at these financial institutions
frequently exceeds federally insured limits. We further limit our exposure to credit risk
associated with these cash accounts by adherence to our investment policy. We have not experienced
any losses in such accounts.
From time to time, we have derived a material portion of our revenues from one or more
significant customers. To date, nearly all our revenues have been derived from sales to customers
within the United States.
Warranty Reserve We provide a standard one-year warranty for our distributed generation and
switchgear equipment, and a five-year warranty for our EfficientLights lighting product. In
addition, we offer extended warranty terms on our distributed generation turn-key and switchgear
projects. We reserve for the estimated cost of product warranties when revenue is recognized, and
we evaluate our reserve periodically by comparing our warranty repair experience by product. The
purchase price for extended warranties or extended warranties included in the contract terms are
deferred as a component of our warranty reserve.
10
Share-Based Compensation We measure compensation cost for all stock-based awards at the
fair value on date of grant and recognize the compensation expense over the service period for
awards expected to vest. We measure the fair value of restricted stock awards based on the number
of shares granted and the quoted price of our common stock on the date of the grant, and we measure
the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes valuation model. These fair values are
recognized as compensation expense over the service period, net of estimated forfeitures.
Pre-tax share-based compensation expense for our stock options and restricted stock awards
recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was $494 and $354, respectively,
and is included in general and administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated statements
of operations.
Income Taxes We recognize deferred income tax assets and liabilities for the estimated
future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. We have net
operating loss carryforwards available in certain jurisdictions to reduce future taxable income.
Future tax benefits for net operating loss carryforwards are recognized to the extent that
realization of these benefits is considered more likely than not. To the extent that available
evidence raises doubt about the realization of a deferred income tax asset, a valuation allowance
is established.
We recognize a liability and income tax expense, including potential penalties and interest,
for uncertain income tax positions taken or expected to be taken. The liability is adjusted for
positions taken when the applicable statute of limitations expires or when the uncertainty of a
particular position is resolved.
Subsequent EventsSubsequent events are events or transactions that occur after the balance
sheet date but before the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued and are
classified as either recognized subsequent events or non-recognized subsequent events. We
recognize and include in our financial statements the effects of subsequent events that provide
additional evidence about conditions that existed at the balance sheet date. We disclose
non-recognized subsequent events that provide evidence about conditions that arise after the
balance sheet date but are not yet reflected in our financial statements when such disclosure is
required to prevent the financial statements from being misleading. See further information
regarding subsequent events in Note 10.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting for Transfers of Financial AssetsIn June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance on
the accounting for the transfers of financial assets. The new guidance, which is now part of ASC
860, Transfers and Servicing, requires additional disclosures for transfers of financial assets,
including securitization transactions, and any continuing exposure to the risks related to
transferred financial assets. There is no longer a concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity,
and the requirements for derecognizing financial assets have changed. The adoption of the new
guidance on January 1, 2010 had no effect on our financial position or results of operations or on
our financial statement disclosures.
Variable Interest EntitiesIn June 2009, the FASB issued revised guidance on the accounting
for variable interest entities. The revised guidance, which is now part of ASC 810-10,
Consolidation, reflects the elimination of the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and
replaces the quantitative-based
11
risks and rewards calculation of the previous guidance for determining which company, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest
entity. The revised guidance requires an analysis of whether a company has: (1) the power to
direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entitys
economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb the losses that could potentially be
significant to the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially
be significant to the entity. An entity is required to be re-evaluated as a variable interest
entity when the holders of the equity investment at risk, as a group, lose the power from voting
rights or similar rights to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entitys
economic performance. Additional disclosures are required about a companys involvement in
variable interest entities and an ongoing assessment of whether a company is the primary
beneficiary. The adoption of the new guidance on January 1, 2010 had no effect on our financial
position or results of operations or on our financial statement disclosures.
Multiple Deliverable Revenue ArrangementsIn October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13,
Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements A Consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force,
which updates ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. ASU No. 2009-13 provides application guidance on
whether multiple deliverables exist, how the deliverables should be separated and how the
consideration should be allocated to one or more units of accounting. This update establishes a
selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. The selling price used
for each deliverable will be based on vendor-specific objective evidence, if available, third-party
evidence if vendor-specific objective evidence is not available, or estimated selling price if
neither vendor-specific or third-party evidence is available. We will be required to apply the new
guidance prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified after January
1, 2011; however, early application is permitted. We are currently evaluating the effect that this
update may have on our financial position or results of operations or on our financial statement
disclosures.
Software Elements in Revenue ArrangementsIn October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-14,
Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements, updating ASC 985, Software. This
update provides new standards that amend the scope of previous software revenue guidance by
excluding non-software components of tangible products and certain software components of tangible
products. These new standards are effective for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2011; however,
early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the effect that this update may have on
our financial position or results of operations or on our financial statement disclosures.
3. Earnings (Loss) per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to
PowerSecure International, Inc. common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to PowerSecure
International, Inc. common stockholders is computed using the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding and, when dilutive, potential common shares from stock options and warrants
using the treasury stock method. Diluted earnings per share excludes the impact of potential
common shares related to stock options and warrants in periods in which we reported a loss from
continuing operations or in which the option or warrant exercise price is greater than the average
market price of our common stock during the period because the effect would be antidilutive. A
total of 376,000 common shares issuable upon the exercise of in-the-money stock options and
warrants were excluded from the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 because their effect was antidilutive.
12
The following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share
attributable to PowerSecure International, Inc. common stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,217 |
|
|
$ |
(1,136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average common
shares outstanding in period |
|
|
17,237 |
|
|
|
17,095 |
|
Add dilutive effects of stock
options and warrants |
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average common
shares outstanding in period |
|
|
17,692 |
|
|
|
17,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common share: |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share: |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate
Through WaterSecure, we currently own 40.45% of the equity interests in Marcum Midstream
1995-2 Business Trust (MM 95-2), which we account for under the equity method. MM 95-2 owns and
operates five water processing and disposal facilities located in northeastern Colorado. The
balance of our equity investment in MM 95-2 includes approximately $729 and $748 of unamortized
purchase premiums we paid on our acquired interests at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively. The premiums are being amortized over a period of 14 years, which represents the
weighted average useful life of the underlying assets acquired.
The following table sets forth certain summarized financial information for MM 1995-2 at March
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Total current assets |
|
$ |
3,595 |
|
|
$ |
2,942 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
8,908 |
|
|
|
8,879 |
|
Total other assets |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
12,508 |
|
|
$ |
11,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
$ |
1,777 |
|
|
$ |
1,433 |
|
Long-term note payable |
|
|
2,541 |
|
|
|
2,749 |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
8,190 |
|
|
|
7,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
12,508 |
|
|
$ |
11,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
4,892 |
|
|
$ |
2,986 |
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
2,346 |
|
|
|
1,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,546 |
|
|
$ |
1,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Debt
Line of CreditWe have an existing credit agreement with Citibank, N.A., as the
administrative agent, along with SunTrust Bank and BB&T, providing for a $50 million senior,
first-priority secured revolving and term credit facility. The credit facility, as amended, is a
$50,000 senior, first-priority secured revolving credit facility that is guaranteed by all of our
active subsidiaries and secured by all of our assets and the assets of our active subsidiaries.
We may, from time to time, request an increase in the aggregate revolving commitment amount by
up to $15,000 without the prior consent of the lenders provided that each lender has the unilateral
right to determine whether it agrees to increase its revolving commitment and that no lender is
required to increase its individual pro rata commitment amount without such lenders consent.
The credit facility, as a revolving credit facility, matures and terminates on November 13,
2011. However, we have the option prior to that maturity date to convert a portion of outstanding
principal balance, in an amount not to exceed the present value of estimated annual contract
revenues receivable under the initial term of contracts for recurring revenue projects executed
after December 31, 2007, into a non-revolving term loan for a two year period expiring November 12,
2013, making quarterly payments based upon a four year fully amortized basis.
We intend to use the proceeds available under the credit facility to finance our PowerSecure
subsidiarys recurring revenue projects as well as to finance capital expenditures, working
capital, acquisitions, and general corporate purposes. Our outstanding borrowings under the credit
facility at any time, the proceeds of which were used for working capital purposes and not in
connection with recurring revenue projects, cannot exceed $15,000.
14
Outstanding balances under the credit facility bear interest, at our discretion, at either the
London Interbank Offered Rate for the corresponding deposits of U. S. Dollars plus an applicable
margin, which is on a sliding scale ranging from 175 basis points to 300 basis points based upon
the our leverage ratio, or at Citibanks alternate base rate plus an applicable margin, on a
sliding scale ranging from 0 basis points to 125 basis points based upon our leverage ratio. Our
leverage ratio is the ratio of our funded indebtedness as of a given date to our consolidated
EBITDA as defined in the credit agreement for the
four consecutive quarters ending on such date. Citibanks alternate base rate is equal to the
higher of the Federal Funds Rate as published by the Federal Reserve of New York plus 0.50%, and
Citibanks prime commercial lending rate.
The credit facility is not subject to any borrowing base computations or limitations, but does
contain certain financial covenants. Our maximum leverage ratio cannot exceed 3.25. Our minimum
fixed charge coverage ratio must be in excess of 1.50, where the fixed charge coverage ratio is
defined as the ratio of the aggregate of our trailing 12 month consolidated EBITDA plus our lease
or rent expense minus our taxes based on income and payable in cash, divided by the sum of our
consolidated interest charges plus our lease or rent expenses plus our scheduled principal payments
and dividends, computed over the previous period. Also, our minimum asset coverage must be in
excess of 1.25, where our asset coverage is defined as the summation of 80% of the book value of
accounts receivable plus 60% of the book value of inventory plus 50% of the book value of net fixed
assets, divided by total funded debt outstanding. In addition, we are required to maintain a
minimum consolidated tangible net worth, computed on a quarterly basis, equal to approximately
$42.8 million, plus 50% of our net income each year ending after December 31, 2007, with no
reduction for any net loss in any year, plus 100% of any equity we raise through the sale of equity
interests, less the amount of any non-cash charges or losses. Finally, our debt to worth ratio,
which is the ratio of our total consolidated indebtedness to our consolidated tangible net worth,
cannot exceed 1.5 to 1.0 at the end of any quarter. At March 31, 2009, we were in compliance with
these financial covenants.
Under the credit facility, our cumulative capital expenditures beginning in 2008 cannot exceed
the sum of $5,000 plus $1,250 per quarter, on a cumulative basis, plus an allowance for our
PowerSecure subsidiary recurring revenue projects generated after December 31, 2007. The credit
facility contains other representations and warranties and affirmative and negative covenants,
including restrictions with respect to liens, indebtedness, loans and investments, material changes
in our business, asset sales or leases or transfers of assets, restricted payments such as
distributions and dividends, mergers or consolidations and transactions with affiliates.
Upon the sale of any of our assets or the assets of our subsidiaries other than in the
ordinary course of business or the public or private sale of any of our equity or debt or the
equity or debt of our subsidiaries other than equity issuances where the aggregate net equity
proceeds do not exceed $10,000, we are required to use the net proceeds thereof to repay any
indebtedness then outstanding under the credit facility, except for certain reinvestment
provisions.
Our obligations under the credit facility are secured by guarantees and security agreements by
each of our active subsidiaries, including but not limited to our PowerSecure subsidiary, Southern
Flow and WaterSecure. The guarantees guaranty all of our obligations under the credit facility,
and the security agreements grant to the lenders a first priority security interest in virtually
all of the assets of each of the parties to the credit agreement.
The credit agreement also contains customary events of default, including payment defaults,
breach of representations and warranties, covenant defaults, cross-defaults, certain bankruptcy or
insolvency events, judgment defaults and certain ERISA-related events.
15
At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, there were no balances outstanding under the credit
facility and we had $50 million available to borrow. However, the availability of this capital under
our credit facility includes restrictions on the use of proceeds, and is dependent upon our ability
to satisfy certain financial and operating covenants, as described above.
6. Capital Lease Obligations
We have a capital lease with SunTrust Equipment Finance and Leasing, an affiliate of SunTrust
bank, from the sale and leaseback of distributed generation equipment placed in service at customer
locations. We received $5,912 from the sale of the equipment in December 2008 which we are repaying under the terms
of the lease with monthly payments of $85 of principal and interest over a period of 84 months. At
the expiration of the term of the lease, we have the option to purchase the equipment for $1,
assuming no default under the lease by us has occurred and is then continuing. The lease is
guaranteed by us under an equipment lease guaranty. The lease and the lease guaranty constitute
permitted indebtedness under our current credit agreement, under which an affiliate of the lessor
is one of the lenders.
Proceeds of the lease financing are being used to finance our PowerSecure subsidiarys
recurring revenue projects as well as to finance capital expenditures and working capital. We
account for the lease financing as a capital lease in our consolidated financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
The lease provides our PowerSecure subsidiary with limited rights, subject to the lessors
approval which will not be unreasonably withheld, to relocate and substitute equipment during its
term. The lease contains customary representations and warranties, covenants relating to the use
and maintenance of the equipment, indemnification, events of default, including payment defaults,
breach of representations and warranties, covenant defaults, cross-defaults, certain bankruptcy or
insolvency events, customary for leases of this nature. The lease also grants to the lessor
certain remedies upon a default, including the right to cancel the lease, to accelerate all rent
payments for the remainder of the term of the lease, to recover liquidated damages, or to repossess
and re-lease, sell or otherwise dispose of the equipment.
Under the lease guaranty, we have unconditionally guaranteed the obligations of our
PowerSecure subsidiary under the lease for the benefit of the lessor.
The balance or our capital lease obligations shown in the consolidated balance sheet at March
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consist primarily of our obligations under the equipment lease
described above.
7. Share-Based Compensation
We recognize compensation expense for all share-based awards made to employees and directors
based on estimated fair values on the date of grant.
Stock Plans Historically, we have granted stock options and restricted stock awards to
employees and directors under various stock plans. We currently maintain two stock plans. Under
our 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the 1998 Stock Plan), we granted incentive stock
options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance
awards and other stock-based awards to our officers, directors, employees, consultants and advisors
for shares of our common stock. Stock options
16
granted under the 1998 Stock Plan contained exercise prices not less than the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant, and had a term
of 10 years from the date of grant. Nonqualified stock option grants to our directors under the
1998 Stock Plan generally vested over periods up to two years. Qualified stock option grants to
our employees under the 1998 Stock Plan generally vested over periods up to five years. The 1998
Stock Plan expired on June 12, 2008, and no additional awards may be made under
the 1998 Stock Plan, although awards granted prior to such date will remain outstanding and subject
to the terms and conditions of those awards.
In March 2008, our board of directors adopted the PowerSecure International, Inc. 2008 Stock
Incentive Plan (the 2008 Stock Plan), which was approved by our stockholders at the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders held on June 9, 2008. The 2008 Stock Plan authorizes our board of
directors to grant incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights,
restricted stock, performance awards and other stock-based awards to our officers, directors,
employees, consultants and advisors for up to an aggregate of 600,000 shares of our common stock.
Stock options granted under the 2008 Stock Plan must contain exercise prices not less than the fair
market value of our common stock on the date of grant, and must contain a term not in excess of 10
years from the date of grant. The 2008 Stock Plan replaced our 1998 Stock Plan.
Stock Options Net income (loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 includes
$104 and $89, respectively, of pre-tax compensation costs related to outstanding stock options.
All of the stock option compensation expense is included in general and administrative expenses in
the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
A summary of option activity for the three months ended March 31, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Term (years) |
|
|
Value |
|
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,627 |
|
|
$ |
5.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted-Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted-Employees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
6.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
17.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2010 |
|
|
1,621 |
|
|
$ |
5.14 |
|
|
|
4.70 |
|
|
$ |
2.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, March 31, 2010 |
|
|
1,351 |
|
|
$ |
4.91 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
$ |
2.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
A summary of option activity for the three months ended March 31, 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Term (years) |
|
|
Value |
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
|
1,708 |
|
|
$ |
5.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted-Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted-Employees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
1.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,678 |
|
|
$ |
5.28 |
|
|
|
5.52 |
|
|
$ |
(1.86 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, March 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,306 |
|
|
$ |
4.68 |
|
|
|
4.66 |
|
|
$ |
(1.26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no stock options granted to either employees or to directors during the three
months ended March 31, 2010 or 2009.
The fair value of stock option grants are amortized over their respective service periods
using the straight-line method and assuming a forfeiture rate of 5%. As of March 31, 2010 and
December 31 2009, there was $716 and $820, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation costs
related to stock options. These costs at March 31, 2010 are expected to be recognized over a
weighted average period of approximately 1.5 years.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the total intrinsic value of stock
options exercised was $2 and $66, respectively. Cash received from stock option exercises for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was $9 and $45, respectively. The total grant date fair
value of stock options vested during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was $163 and
$183, respectively.
Restricted Stock Awards Net income (loss) for the three months ended March 31,
2010 and 2009 includes $390 and $265, respectively, of pre-tax compensation costs related to
outstanding restricted stock awards granted to directors, certain officers and our employees. All
of the restricted stock award compensation expense during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009 is included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements
of operations.
There were no restricted stock awards issued during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009. A summary of restricted stock award activity for the three months ended March 31, 2010 is as
follows:
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Unvested |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
|
|
561 |
|
|
$ |
10.36 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
7.50 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2010 |
|
|
486 |
|
|
$ |
10.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of restricted stock award activity for the three months ended March 31, 2009
is as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Unvested |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
|
628 |
|
|
$ |
12.06 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
12.11 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2009 |
|
|
559 |
|
|
$ |
12.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted shares are subject to forfeiture and cannot be sold or otherwise transferred
until they vest. If the holder of the restricted shares leaves us before the restricted shares
vest, other than due to termination by us without cause, then any unvested restricted shares will
be forfeited and returned to us. The restricted shares granted to directors vest in equal amounts
over a period of one or three years, depending on the nature of the grant. The restricted shares
granted to employees other than officers vest in equal annual amounts over five years. A total of
322,500 unvested restricted shares granted to our officers cliff vest in 2012, and a total of
129,000 restricted shares vest in 2011 and 2012 based on certain performance goals being met. All
restricted and unvested shares will automatically vest upon a change in control.
The fair value of the cliff vesting restricted shares is being amortized on a straight-line
basis over the vesting period. The fair value of the performance vesting shares is expensed as the
achievement of the performance criteria becomes probable and the related service period conditions
are met. At March 31, 2010, the balance of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested
restricted shares was $2,970, which, assuming all future performance criteria will be met, will be
recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.5 years.
8. Commitments and Contingencies
From time to time, we hire employees that are subject to restrictive covenants, such as
non-competition agreements with their former employers. We comply, and require our employees to
comply, with the terms of all known restrictive covenants. However, we have in the past and may in
the future receive claims and demands by some former employers alleging actual or potential
violations of
19
these restrictive covenants. While we do not believe any pending claims have merit,
we cannot provide any assurance of the outcome of these claims.
From time to time, in the ordinary course of business we encounter performance issues with key
component parts we utilize in our distributed generation systems, switchgear systems, utility
infrastructure products, and lighting products, such as engines, generators, alternators, breakers,
fuel systems, LED and other lighting technologies, and other complex electrical components. While
we strive to utilize high quality component parts from reputable suppliers, and to back-up their
quality and performance with manufacturers warranties, even the best parts and components have
performance issues from time to time, and these performance issues create significant financial and
operating risks to our business, operations and financial results. Additionally, because we
regularly develop new products and technical designs, we often incorporate component parts into
these new products in configurations, for uses, and in environments, for which limited experience
exists that exposes us to performance risks which may or may not be covered by warranties. These risks include the potential material and
adverse effects on our business, operations, reputation and financial results, including reduced
revenues, additional expenses and capital cost, and asset write-offs, due to the cancellation or
deferral of projects by our customers, or claims made by our customers for damages, as a result of
performance issues.
Although we believe our suppliers warranties generally cover many of these performance
issues, from time to time we face disputes with our suppliers with respect to those performance
issues and their warranty obligations, or the performance issues are not covered by manufacturers
warranties, and our customers may claim to incur damages as a result of those performance issues.
We estimate that from time to time we have performance issues with an amount equivalent to
approximately 5-10% of our estimated annual revenues related to component parts installed in
distributed generation systems, lighting products, and other products and equipment we have sold to
various customers across our business lines, and additional performance issues could arise in the
future. The outcome of any warranty claims is inherently difficult to predict due to the
uncertainty of technical solutions, cost, customer requirements, and the uncertainty inherent in
litigation and disputes generally, and thus there is no assurance we will not be adversely affected
by these, or other performance issues with key parts and components. In addition, the mere
existence of performance issues, even if finally resolved with our suppliers, can have an adverse
effect on our reputation for quality, which could adversely affect our business. Accordingly,
potential negative financial impacts from these items cannot be estimated at this time.
From time to time, we are involved in other disputes, claims, proceedings and legal actions
arising in the ordinary course of business. We intend to vigorously defend all claims against us.
Although the ultimate outcome of these proceedings cannot be accurately predicted due to the
inherent uncertainty of litigation, in the opinion of management, based upon current information,
no other currently pending or overtly threatened proceeding is expected to have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
9. Income Taxes
The tax provision recorded at March 31, 2010 is our best estimate of our tax expense taking
into consideration our expectation of future earnings, federal alternative minimum tax, state
income tax for state jurisdictions in which we expect taxable income, potential effects of adverse
outcomes on tax positions we have taken, true-up effects of prior tax provision estimates compared
to actual tax returns, and our net operating loss carryforwards and valuation allowance.
20
10. Subsequent Events
Acquisition of IES On April 1, 2010, we launched an expansion of our LED lighting business
through the formation and acquisition of a 67% controlling interest in Innovative Electronic
Solutions Lighting, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (IES), which acquired substantially
all of the assets and business of a leading LED lighting development company, Innovative Electronic
Solutions, LLC, in order to accelerate the expansion of new LED lighting products and to capitalize
on the growing marketplace for LED lighting. The new business will design and manufacture new
LED-based lighting products (light emitting diode based products) for commercial, industrial, and
retail customers. The business will include turn-key product development, design and manufacturing
of solid state LED-based lights and their components, including power drivers, light engines, and
thermal management solutions.
IES commenced its business and operations by acquiring, on April 1, 2010, substantially all of
the assets and business of Innovative Electronic Solutions, LLC, a North Carolina limited
liability company. Since 2002, the business acquired by IES has engineered dozens of innovative
lighting products for many of the largest and fastest growing LED lighting companies in the
marketplace. Among these products is a leading LED street light for utilities that is currently
being deployed in the U.S., with additional near-term opportunities to provide the street light to
international customers. In addition, IES has acquired expertise and market leading technology in
the areas of LED power drivers, light engines, and thermal management solutions. This expertise
and technology is expected to enable IES to design and manufacture high quality LED lighting
products with strong competitive advantages driven by lighting designs that maximize the energy
efficiency savings for given light outputs. IES manufacturing operations are located in the
Raleigh, N.C. area.
Our PowerSecure subsidiary owns 67% of the membership interests in, and controls the
management of, IES. Our PowerSecure subsidiary contributed approximately $4.4 million to IES to
fund the capitalization of IES and the acquisition by IES of substantially all of the assets and
business of the seller as well as the assumption by IES of the sellers current liabilities. In
connection with its sale and contribution of substantially all of its asset and business to IES,
the seller received the remaining 33% membership interests in IES.
The operations of IES will be included within our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions operating
segment commencing from the date of acquisition. We have not yet completed our allocation of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Pro forma results of operations for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 have not been included herein as the effects of the acquisition were
not material to our results of operations.
Both our PowerSecure subsidiary and the seller are subject to various buy-sell rights and
obligations with respect to their equity interests in IES, including various call, put and
drag-along rights and obligations. Commencing in 2012, our PowerSecure subsidiary has the right to
purchase the minority interest in IES held by the seller and thus increase its ownership of IES to
100%, through the issuance and delivery of shares of our common stock in an amount based on a
formula derived from the value of our stock using our E.P.S multiple (or if we do not have positive
net income, then our revenue multiple) applied to IESs minority interest, subject to a minimum
value of $10 million.
21
Acquisition of Noncontrolling Interest in EfficientLights On April 30, 2010, our PowerSecure
subsidiary, which previously owned two-thirds of the equity interests in EfficientLights, exercised
its option and acquired the remaining one-third minority interest in EfficientLights. The minority
interests in EfficientLights was previously owned by the founder, who is also the President of
EfficientLights, and five other key employees of EfficientLights. EfficientLights markets and
sells LED-based lights that reduce the energy and maintenance costs for refrigerated cases in
grocery, drug, and convenience stores, and is in the process of developing other LED-based lighting
products, including additional in-store retail lighting, and LED-based parking lot lights, street
lights and security lights. As a result of the exercise of our option to purchase the remaining
one-third minority interest, EfficientLights has become a wholly-owned subsidiary of our
PowerSecure subsidiary and there will no longer be a reduction in our net income for net income
attributable to the noncontrolling interest after the date of acquisition. Our PowerSecure
subsidiary acquired the minority interest in EfficientLights in exchange for 1,025,641
shares of our common stock.
11. Segment Information
Our operating segments represent components of our business for which discrete financial
information is available and are reviewed regularly by the chief operating decision-maker, or
decision-making group, to evaluate performance and make operating decisions. We conduct our
operations through two operating segments: Energy and Smart Grid Solutions, and Energy Services.
Our reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different products and services and
serve different customer bases. They are managed separately because each business requires
different technology and marketing strategies.
Energy and Smart Grid Solutions Through our PowerSecure subsidiary we serve utilities and
commercial, institutional, and industrial customers in the areas of Interactive Distributed
Generation, Utility Infrastructure and Energy Efficiency. Each of these PowerSecure subsidiary
business units operates in a distinct market with distinct technical disciplines, but shares a
common customer base with other PowerSecure subsidiary products and services and which we grow
through shared resources and customer relationships. Accordingly, these units are included within
our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment results; and
Energy Services Through our Southern Flow and WaterSecure subsidiaries we serve customers
in the oil and natural gas production business with our measurement services and products, and
water processing and disposal services. Southern Flows services include on-site field services,
chart processing and analysis, laboratory analysis, and data management and reporting. These
services are provided principally to customers involved in natural gas production, gathering,
transportation and processing. WaterSecure, through its equity investment in MM 95-2, provides
water processing and disposal for oil and natural gas producers.
The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in Note 1
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. We evaluate the performance of our operating
segments based on income (loss) before income taxes. Intersegment sales are not significant.
22
Summarized financial information concerning our reportable segments is shown in the following
table. Unallocated corporate cost amounts include corporate overhead and related items including
restructuring charges, other income and assets of discontinued operations which, for purposes of
evaluating the operations of our segments, are not allocated to our segment activities. Total
asset amounts exclude intercompany receivable balances eliminated in consolidation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
Energy and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Smartgrid |
|
|
Energy |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solutions |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
20,460 |
|
|
$ |
4,214 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
24,674 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
11,907 |
|
|
|
3,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
8,553 |
|
|
|
1,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
5,579 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
1,327 |
|
|
|
7,326 |
|
Selling, marketing and service |
|
|
1,047 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,053 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
7,190 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
1,328 |
|
|
|
9,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
1,363 |
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
(1,328 |
) |
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income and (expenses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,030 |
|
Management fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154 |
|
Interest income and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
$ |
1,293 |
|
|
$ |
1,706 |
|
|
$ |
(1,369 |
) |
|
$ |
1,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures |
|
$ |
1,387 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment in unconsolidated affiliate |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,177 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
80,985 |
|
|
$ |
17,012 |
|
|
$ |
16,226 |
|
|
$ |
114,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Energy and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Smartgrid |
|
|
Energy |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solutions |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
15,215 |
|
|
$ |
4,505 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,720 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
10,441 |
|
|
|
3,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
4,774 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
4,413 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
1,113 |
|
|
|
6,040 |
|
Selling, marketing and service |
|
|
826 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
831 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
5,700 |
|
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
7,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(926 |
) |
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
(1,114 |
) |
|
|
(1,539 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income and (expenses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
477 |
|
Management fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
Interest income and other income |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
$ |
(1,030 |
) |
|
$ |
1,083 |
|
|
$ |
(1,131 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,078 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures |
|
$ |
541 |
|
|
$ |
113 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment in unconsolidated affiliate |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,957 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
69,340 |
|
|
$ |
15,709 |
|
|
$ |
19,627 |
|
|
$ |
104,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* * * * *
24
|
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations |
Introduction
The following discussion and analysis of our consolidated results of operations for the three
month period ended March 31, 2010, which we refer to as the first quarter 2010, and the three month
period ended March 31, 2009, which we refer to as the first quarter 2009, and of our consolidated
financial condition as of March 31, 2010 should be read in conjunction with our consolidated
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the documents incorporated into this report by
reference contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of and made under the safe harbor
provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934. From time to time in the future, we may make additional forward-looking statements in
presentations, at conferences, in press releases, in other reports and filings and otherwise.
Forward-looking statements are all statements other than statements of historical fact, including
statements that refer to plans, intentions, objectives, goals, strategies, hopes, beliefs,
projections, prospects, expectations or other characterizations of future events or performance,
and assumptions underlying the foregoing. The words may, could, should, would, will,
project, intend, continue, believe, anticipate, estimate, forecast, expect, plan,
potential, opportunity and scheduled, variations of such words, and other comparable
terminology and similar expressions are often, but not always, used to identify forward-looking
statements. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements
about the following:
|
|
|
our prospects, including our future business, revenues, expenses, net
income, margins, profitability, cash flow, cash position, liquidity, financial
condition and results of operations, our targeted growth rate and our expectations
about realizing the revenue in our backlog and in our sales pipeline; |
|
|
|
|
the effects on our business, financial condition and results of operations
of current and future economic, business, market and regulatory conditions, including
the downturn in the economy and the adverse effects of the difficult credit markets on
our customers and their capital spending and ability to finance purchases of our
products, services, technologies and systems; |
|
|
|
|
the effects of fluctuations in sales on our business, revenues, expenses,
net income, margins, profitability, cash flow, liquidity, financial condition and
results of operations; |
|
|
|
|
our products, services, technologies and systems, including their quality
and performance in absolute terms and as compared to competitive alternatives, their
benefits to our customers and their ability to meet our customers requirements, and
our ability to successfully develop and market new products, services, technologies and
systems; |
|
|
|
|
our markets, including our market position or market share; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully develop, operate, grow and diversify our
operations and businesses; |
|
|
|
|
our business plans, strategies, goals and objectives, and our ability to
successfully achieve them; |
|
|
|
|
the sufficiency of our capital resources, including our cash and cash
equivalents, funds generated from operations, availability of borrowings under our
credit and financing arrangements and other capital resources, to meet our future
working capital, capital expenditure, lease and debt service and business growth needs; |
|
|
|
|
the value of our assets and businesses, including the revenues, profits
and cash flow they are capable of delivering in the future; |
|
|
|
|
industry trends and customer preferences and the demand for our products,
services, technologies and systems; |
|
|
|
the nature and intensity of our competition, and our ability to
successfully compete in our markets; |
|
|
|
|
business acquisitions, combinations, sales, alliances, ventures and other
similar business transactions and relationships; and |
|
|
|
|
the effects on our business, financial condition and results of operations
of litigation and other claims and proceedings that arise from time to time. |
Any forward-looking statements we make are based on our current plans, intentions, objectives,
goals, strategies, hopes, beliefs, projections and expectations, as well as assumptions made by and
information currently available to management. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of
future performance or events, but are subject to and qualified by substantial risks, uncertainties
and other factors, which are difficult to predict and are often beyond our control.
Forward-looking statements will be affected by assumptions and expectations we might make that do
not materialize or that prove to be incorrect and by known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed,
anticipated or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and other
factors include, but are not limited to, those described in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2009, as amended or supplemented in subsequently filed Quarterly
Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, as well
as other risks, uncertainties and factors discussed elsewhere in this report, in documents that we
include as exhibits to or incorporate by reference in this report, and in other reports and
documents we from time to time file with or furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission. In
light of these risks and uncertainties, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any
forward-looking statements that we make.
Any forward-looking statements contained in this report speak only as of the date of this
report, and any other forward-looking statements we make from time to time in the future speak only
as of the date they are made. We undertake no duty or obligation to update or revise any
forward-looking statement or to publicly disclose any update or revision for any reason, whether as
a result of changes in our expectations or the underlying assumptions, the receipt of new
information, the occurrence of future or unanticipated events, circumstances or conditions or
otherwise.
Overview
PowerSecure International, Inc., based in Wake Forest, North Carolina, is a leading provider
of Energy and Smart Grid Solutions to electric utilities, and their commercial, institutional, and
industrial customers. Our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment provides products and services
in the areas of Interactive Distributed Generation (IDG), Utility Infrastructure, and Energy
Efficiency, and our Energy
25
Services segment provides services to the oil and natural gas industry through our Southern
Flow and WaterSecure business units.
Through our PowerSecure, Inc. subsidiary we operate our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions
segment and focus on three of these areas: Interactive Distributed Generation, Utility
Infrastructure, and Energy Efficiency.
Our Interactive Distributed Generation business involves manufacturing, installing, and
operating electric generation equipment located at the facility where the power is used, including
commercial, institutional, and industrial operations, generally on behalf of electric utilities.
Our equipment provides a dependable backup power supply during power outages, and provides a more
efficient and environmentally friendly source of power during high cost periods of peak power
demand. Our Interactive Distributed Generation systems contain our proprietary electronic
controls, which enable our systems to be monitored around the clock by our smart grid monitoring
center, protecting our customers operations from power outages and the costs of those outages.
Through our monitoring center, we also forecast utilities peak demand periods, and electronically
deploy our systems during these periods to power the customers operations.
Our Interactive Distributed Generation systems are sold to customers utilizing two basic
economic models, each of which can vary depending on the specific customer and application. Our
primary transaction is a project-based model whereby we sell the distributed generation system to
the customer, which we refer to as a project-based or a customer-owned model. For distributed
generation systems sold under a project-based model, the customer is investing the up-front capital
to acquire ownership of the distributed generation system. Our revenues and profits from the sale
of the system are recognized over the period during which the system is installed. We will also
usually receive a modest amount of on-going monthly revenue to monitor the system for backup power
and peak shaving purposes, as well as to maintain the system. A second distributed generation
business model that represents an increasing portion of our revenues is a structure which generates
long-term recurring revenues, which we refer to as our recurring revenue model or a
PowerSecure-owned model. For distributed generation systems deployed under this model, we retain
ownership of the distributed generation system after it is installed at the customers site.
Because of this, we invest the capital required to design and build the system, and our revenues
are derived from regular fees paid over the life of the recurring revenue contract by the utility
or the customer, or both, for access to the system for standby power and peak shaving. The life of
these recurring revenue contracts is typically between five to fifteen years. The fees that
generate our revenues in the recurring revenue model are generally paid to us on a monthly basis
and are set at a level that provides us with attractive returns on the capital we invest in
installing and maintaining the system. For some recurring revenue contracts, referred to as
shared savings recurring revenue contracts, all, or some portion, of the fees are paid out of the
peak shaving savings the system generates for the customer.
Our Utility Infrastructure business is focused on helping electric utilities design, build,
upgrade, and maintain infrastructure that enhances the efficiency of their grid systems. Through
our UtilityServices business, we provide transmission and distribution system construction and
maintenance products and services, install advanced metering and efficient lighting, and emergency
storm restoration services. Additionally, through our UtilityEngineering and PowerServices
consulting engineering firms, we provide utilities with a wide range of engineering and design
services, as well as consulting services for regulatory and rate design matters.
26
Revenues for our UtilityEngineering and PowerServices businesses are earned, billed, and
recognized based on the number of hours invested in the particular projects and engagements they
are serving. Similar to most traditional consulting businesses, these hours are billed at rates
that reflect the general technical skill or experience level of the consultant or supervisor
providing the services. In some cases, our engineers and consultants are engaged on an on-going
basis with utilities, providing resources to supplement utilities internal engineering teams over
long-term time horizons. In other cases, our engineers and consultants are engaged to provide
services for very specific projects and assignments.
Revenues for our UtilityServices business are generally earned, billed, and recognized in two
primary models. Under the first model, we have regular, on-going assignments with utilities to
provide regular maintenance and upgrade services. These services are earned, billed, and
recognized either on a fixed fee basis, based on the number of work units we perform, such as the
number of transmission poles we upgrade, or on an hourly fee basis, based on the number of hours we
invest in a particular project, plus amounts for the materials we utilize and install. Under the
second model, we are engaged to design, build and install large infrastructure projects, including
substations, transmission lines, and similar infrastructure, for utilities and their customers. In
these types of projects we are generally paid a fixed price for the project, plus any modifications
or scope additions. We recognize revenues from these projects on a percentage-of-completion basis
as they are completed. In addition to those primary models, in some cases, we are engaged by
utilities and their customers to build or upgrade transmission and distribution infrastructure that
we own and maintain. In those cases, we receive fees over a long-term contract for the customer to
have access to the infrastructure to transmit or receive power.
Our Energy Efficiency area is focused on providing energy solutions to commercial,
institutional, and industrial customers that deliver strong returns on investment by reducing
energy costs, improving their operations, and benefiting the environment. Our primary business in
this area is our EfficientLights business, and our primary product is our EfficientLights LED-based
lights that reduce the energy and maintenance costs for refrigerated cases in grocery, drug, and
convenience stores. Additionally, we are in the process of developing other LED-based lighting
products, including additional in-store retail lighting, and LED-based street lights and security
lights. Our other business in this area is our EnergyLite business, which designs and installs
cost-effective energy improvement systems for general lighting, building controls and other
facility upgrades.
We generate revenues in our EfficientLights business through the sale of our proprietary LED
lights. From time-to-time we will also provide installation services, although that is not a
significant portion of our business. We will also assist our customers in receiving utility
incentives for LED lighting. Our customers are primarily large retail chains, and their
installations of EfficientLights have been across various numerous stores within their store base
over a diverse geographic scope. We also sell our LED lights to, and through, original equipment
manufacturers, or OEMs, of refrigerator and freezer cases. We expect our customer base and sales
channels to continue to grow and develop as LED technology continues to be more widely adopted. As
we bring additional products to market, including our LED-based street light, we expect to employ a
similar business model, although for the street light our customers will likely include utilities,
municipalities, and broad categories of retailers.
Our Energy Services segment includes our Southern Flow Companies, Inc. and WaterSecure
Holdings, Inc. subsidiaries, and the focus of this segment is on business opportunities in the
energy services field.
27
Our Southern Flow business provides a variety of oil and natural gas measurement services
principally to customers involved in the business of oil and natural gas production, gathering,
transportation and processing, with a focus on the natural gas market. Southern Flows measurement
services are used by producers and pipeline companies to verify volumes of natural gas custody
transfers. Southern Flows field services include the installation, testing, calibration, sales
and maintenance of measurement equipment and instruments, as well as laboratory analysis of natural
gas and natural gas liquids chemical and energy content. As an integral part of these services,
Southern Flow maintains a comprehensive inventory of natural gas meters and metering parts for
resale. Southern Flow derives its revenues entirely from the sale of its services to its
customers.
We also conduct our Energy Services operations through our WaterSecure business. Through
WaterSecure, we own approximately 40% of the equity interests of MM 1995-2, an unconsolidated
business. Equity income at our Energy Services segment consists of our minority ownership interest
in the earnings of the WaterSecure operations. Our equity income is a direct function of the net
income of the WaterSecure operations as well as changes in our ownership interest. The WaterSecure
operations own and operate water processing and disposal facilities in northeastern Colorado, and
the business serves natural gas production companies in that area. The WaterSecure operations
primarily operate under long term contracts to process and dispose of water utilized in customers
natural gas production operations. This processing utilizes techniques that are environmentally
responsible, and the quality of the services of the WaterSecure operations and the location of its
facilities provides it with a strong position in its markets.
Recent Developments
On May 6, 2010, we announced that our PowerSecure subsidiary had been awarded $15.0 million of
new orders for Interactive Distributed Generation (IDG) smart grid power systems and utility
infrastructure projects. The IDG systems will be deployed in partnership with utilities to support
manufacturers, hospitals, and municipal facilities across the country, including large
installations in Colorado, Oklahoma, and Georgia. This $15.0 million of new business is included
in our revenue backlog as described below.
On April 30, 2010, through our PowerSecure subsidiary, which owned two-thirds of the equity
interests in EfficientLights, we exercised our option and acquired the remaining one-third minority
interest in EfficientLights. The minority interests in EfficientLights were previously owned by
the founder, who is also the President of EfficientLights, and five other key employees of
EfficientLights. EfficientLights markets and sells LED-based lights that reduce the energy and
maintenance costs for refrigerated cases in grocery, drug, and convenience stores, and is in the
process of developing other LED-based lighting products, including additional in-store retail
lighting, and LED-based parking lot lights, street lights and security lights. As a result,
EfficientLights has become a wholly-owned subsidiary of our PowerSecure subsidiary and there will
no longer be a reduction in our net income for net income attributable to the noncontrolling
interest after the date of acquisition. Our PowerSecure subsidiary acquired the minority interest
in EfficientLights in exchange for 1,025,641 shares of our common stock.
On April 1, 2010, we launched an expansion of our LED lighting business through the formation
and acquisition of a 67% controlling interest in Innovative Electronic Solutions Lighting, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company (IES), which acquired substantially all of the assets and
business of a leading LED lighting development company, Innovative Electronic Solutions, LLC, in
order to accelerate the expansion of new LED lighting products and to capitalize on the growing
marketplace for
28
LED lighting. The new business will design and manufacture new LED-based lighting products
(light emitting diode based products) for commercial, industrial, and retail customers. The
business will include turn-key product development, design and manufacturing of solid state
LED-based lights and their components, including power drivers, light engines, and thermal
management solutions.
IESs expertise and technology enables the design and manufacture of high quality LED lighting
products with strong competitive advantages driven by designs that maximize the energy efficiency
savings for given light outputs. IES manufacturing operations are located in the Raleigh, N.C.
area.
Our PowerSecure subsidiary owns 67% of the membership interests in, and controls the
management of, IES. Our PowerSecure subsidiary contributed approximately $4.4 million to IES to
fund the capitalization of IES and the acquisition by IES of substantially all of the assets and
business of the seller as well as the assumption by IES of the sellers current liabilities. In
connection with its sale and contribution of substantially all of its asset and business to IES,
the seller received the remaining 33% membership interests in IES.
Both our PowerSecure subsidiary and the seller are subject to various buy-sell rights and
obligations with respect to their equity interests in IES, including various call, put and
drag-along rights and obligations. Commencing in 2012, our PowerSecure subsidiary has the right to
purchase the minority interest in IES held by the seller and thus increase its ownership of IES to
100%, through the issuance and delivery of shares of our common stock in an amount based on a
formula derived from the value of our stock using our E.P.S multiple (or if we do not have positive
net income, then our revenue multiple) applied to IESs minority interest, subject to a minimum
value of $10 million.
Due to an increase in revenues in our PowerSecure subsidiary, our consolidated revenues during
the first quarter 2010 increased by $5.0 million, representing a 25.1% increase compared to our
first quarter 2009 consolidated revenues. The primary drivers of this first quarter year-over-year
revenue increase were increases in our Energy Efficiency business revenues of 93.9%, which was a
result of a 104.2% increase in our EfficientLights LED lighting product revenues, as well as
increases in our Interactive Distributed Generation business revenues of 41.6%. These increases
were partially offset by a modest decrease in our Energy Services segment revenues, as our Southern
Flow revenues decreased by 6.5% on a year-over-year basis. Our record first quarter 2010 gross
margin as a percentage of revenue of 38.9% represents the fourth consecutive quarter of sequential
and year-over-year increases in this statistic. These gross margin gains were driven by a
combination of a favorable mix of projects period-to-period, and favorable cost of sales resulting
from a focus on project cost management. We expect our gross margins to be lower in the near term,
however, as several high margin projects have been completed, or are near completion, as of the end
of our first quarter of 2010.
During the first quarter 2010, we expanded our investment in operating infrastructure,
including personnel, vehicles and facilities, to support business growth and new product
development activities. Additionally, our operating expenses increased due to increases in
selling expense due to higher revenue, increases in compensation expense, and increases in
depreciation from capital deployed to support our growing recurring revenue business. As a result,
our total operating expenses during the first quarter 2010 increased by $1.6 million, or 21.9%,
compared to our first quarter 2009. We expect our operating expenses to increase somewhat from our
first quarter 2010 levels in the near-term as we continue to support and invest in the growth of our
business. Over the long-term, we expect our operating expenses to further increase as we continue
to invest in and support our long-term growth. As a result of higher oil prices and stabilizing
conditions in the natural gas markets, our first quarter 2010 management fees and
29
equity income from the WaterSecure operations increased by a combined $0.6 million compared to
the first quarter 2009. In total, our consolidated net income was $1.4 million during the first
quarter 2010, as compared to net loss of $1.1 million during the first quarter 2009.
Due to the continued growth and development of our EfficientLights operations in 2009 and
early 2010, we recorded a reduction to net income attributable to PowerSecure International, Inc.
common stockholders in the amount of $0.2 million representing the noncontrolling members 33%
interest in the net income of EfficientLights during the first quarter 2010 compared to a similar
reduction of less than $0.1 million during the first quarter 2009. As a result of the reductions
to net income for the noncontrolling members interest in EfficientLights, the net income
attributable to PowerSecure International, Inc. common stockholders was $1.2 million in the first
quarter 2010, as compared to a net loss attributable to PowerSecure International, Inc. common
stockholders of $1.1 million in the first quarter 2009.
As discussed below under Fluctuations, our financial results will fluctuate from quarter
to quarter and year to year. Thus, there is no assurance that our past results, including the
results of our year ended December 31, 2009 or our quarter ended March 31, 2010, will be indicative
of our future results, especially in light of the current significant downturn in the economy and
crisis negatively affecting the credit and capital markets.
Backlog
As of the date of this report, our revenue backlog expected to be recognized after March 31,
2010 is $117 million. This includes revenue related to the new business announcement made by us on
May 6, 2010, and compares to the $120 million of revenue backlog we reported on March 11, 2010 (the
date we last reported our backlog). Our revenue backlog and the estimated timing of revenue
recognition is outlined below, including project-based revenues expected to be recognized as
projects are completed, and recurring revenues expected to be recognized over the life of the
contracts:
Revenue Backlog to be recognized after March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anticipated |
|
Estimated Primary |
Description |
|
Revenue |
|
Recognition Period |
|
Project-based Revenue Near term
|
|
$52 Million
|
|
2Q10 through 4Q10 |
Project-based Revenue Long term
|
|
$13 Million
|
|
1Q11 through 2Q12 |
Recurring Revenue
|
|
$52 Million
|
|
2Q10 through 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Backlog to be recognized after March 31, 2010
|
|
$117 Million |
|
|
Note: Anticipated revenue and estimated primary recognition periods are estimates
subject to risks and uncertainties and subject to change. Consistent with past
practice, these figures are not intended to constitute the Companys total
revenue over the indicated time periods, as the Company has additional, regular
on- going revenues. Examples of additional, regular recurring revenues include
revenues from the Companys Southern Flow business, engineering fees, and service
revenue, among others.
Numbers may not add due to rounding.
Orders in our backlog are subject to delay, deferral, acceleration, resizing, or
cancellation from time to time by our customers, subject to contractual rights. Given the
irregular sales cycle of customer
orders, and especially of large orders, our revenue backlog at any given time is not
necessarily an accurate indication of our future revenues.
30
Operating Segments
We conduct our operations through two operating segments: Energy and Smart Grid Solutions, and
Energy Services. Our reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different
products and services and serve different customer bases. They are managed separately because each
business has a different customer base, requires different technology and personnel, and has
different marketing strategies.
Energy and Smart Grid Solutions
Through our PowerSecure subsidiary we serve utilities and commercial, institutional, and
industrial customers in the areas of Interactive Distributed Generation, Utility Infrastructure and
Energy Efficiency. Each of these PowerSecure subsidiary business units operates in a distinct
market with distinct technical disciplines, but share a common or complementary customer base with
other PowerSecure subsidiary products and services and which we grow through shared resources and
customer relationships. Accordingly, these units are included within our Energy and Smart Grid
Solutions segment results.
Energy Services
Through our Southern Flow and WaterSecure subsidiaries we serve customers in the oil and
natural gas production business with our measurement services and products, and water processing
and disposal services. Southern Flows services include on-site field services, chart processing
and analysis, laboratory analysis, and data management and reporting. These services are provided
principally to customers involved in natural gas production, gathering, transportation and
processing. WaterSecure, through its equity investment in MM 1995-2, provides water processing and
disposal for oil and natural gas producers.
Results of Operations
First Quarter 2010 Compared to First Quarter 2009
Revenues
Our segment revenues are generated entirely by sales and services provided by our PowerSecure
subsidiary (which constitutes our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment) and our Southern Flow
subsidiary (which constitutes our Energy Services segment). The following table summarizes our
segment revenues for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, |
|
|
Period-over-Period Difference |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Segment Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy and Smart Grid Solutions |
|
$ |
20,460 |
|
|
$ |
15,215 |
|
|
$ |
5,245 |
|
|
|
34.5 |
% |
Energy Services |
|
|
4,214 |
|
|
|
4,505 |
|
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
|
-6.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
24,674 |
|
|
$ |
19,720 |
|
|
$ |
4,954 |
|
|
|
25.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
Our consolidated revenues for the first quarter 2010 increased $5.0 million, or 25.1%,
compared to the first quarter 2009 due primarily to an increase in our Energy and Smart Grid
Solutions segment revenues, partially offset by a small decrease in sales and service revenues of
our Energy Services segment.
Our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment distributed generation revenues are very heavily
affected by the number, size and timing of our Interactive Distributed Generation projects as well
as the percentage of completion of in-process projects, and the percentage of turn-key as opposed
to recurring revenue projects. Our Interactive Distributed Generation sales have fluctuated
significantly in the past and are expected to continue to fluctuate significantly in the future.
Our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment revenues increased by $5.2 million, or 34.5%, during
the first quarter 2010 compared to the first quarter 2009. The increase in those revenues in the
first quarter 2010 over the first quarter 2009 was primarily attributable to a 104.2% increase in
revenues from our EfficientLights LED lighting technology products, and a 41.6% increase in
revenues from our Interactive Distributed Generation products brought about with gradual
improvements in economic conditions and increased business investment spending by customers and
potential customers, partially offset by a 45.8% decrease in switchgear product revenues.
The future level of our revenues will depend on the timing and degree of the recovery of the
economy, the health of the credit markets and the return to higher levels of customer spending for
capital improvements and energy efficiency, as well as our ability to secure new significant
purchase orders. The level and timing of our future revenues will also be affected by the amount
and proportion of revenues coming from Interactive Distributed Generation system recurring revenue
projects, which results in revenue being recognized over a longer period compared to project-based
sales.
Assuming the recent economic recovery continues, we currently expect our Energy and Smart Grid
Solutions segment revenue to show higher levels of revenue during the second half of 2010, and
beyond, but the absolute pace of our revenue growth will depend on how quickly economic conditions
improve and customers resume pre-recession levels of spending on capital improvements and energy
efficiency.
Our Energy Services segment sales and service revenue decreased 6.5%, during the first quarter
2010, as compared to the first quarter 2009, due to a combined decrease in field and service
related revenues, together with a decrease in equipment sales. The continued relatively low
natural gas prices negatively affected our Energy Services segment sales and service revenues
during the first quarter 2010, and although market conditions have stabilized, we expect that
relatively low natural gas prices will continue to negatively affect our Energy Services segment in
the foreseeable future. In addition, our Energy Services revenues are significantly affected by
severe weather conditions, the extent of which is unpredictable for any particular period. See
Fluctuations below.
Gross Profit and Gross Profit Margins
Our segment gross profit represents our revenues less our cost of sales. Our segment gross
profit margin represents our gross profit divided by our revenues. The following tables summarizes
our segment costs of sales along with our segment gross profits and gross profit margins for the
periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, |
|
|
Period-over-Period Difference |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Segment Cost of Sales and Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy and Smart Grid Solutions |
|
$ |
11,907 |
|
|
$ |
10,441 |
|
|
$ |
1,466 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
% |
Energy Services |
|
|
3,176 |
|
|
|
3,405 |
|
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
-6.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
15,083 |
|
|
$ |
13,846 |
|
|
$ |
1,237 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Gross Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy and Smart Grid Solutions |
|
$ |
8,553 |
|
|
$ |
4,774 |
|
|
$ |
3,779 |
|
|
|
79.2 |
% |
Energy Services |
|
|
1,038 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
-5.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
9,591 |
|
|
$ |
5,874 |
|
|
$ |
3,717 |
|
|
|
63.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Gross Profit Margins: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy and Smart Grid Solutions |
|
|
41.8 |
% |
|
|
31.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Services |
|
|
24.6 |
% |
|
|
24.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
38.9 |
% |
|
|
29.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of sales and services include materials, personnel and related overhead costs
incurred to manufacture products and provide services. The 8.9% increase in our consolidated cost
of sales and services for the first quarter 2010, compared to the first quarter 2009, was
attributable almost entirely to the costs associated with the 25.1% increase in sales, partially
offset by the factors discussed below leading to the improvement in our gross profit margin.
The 14.0% increase in our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment cost of sales and services
in the first quarter 2010 was driven by a 34.5% increase in our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions
segment sales and services revenue, partially offset by the factors discussed below leading to the
improvement in our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment gross profit margin. Our Energy and
Smart Grid Solutions segment gross profit increased $3.8 million, or 79.2%, in the first quarter
2010, compared to the first quarter 2009. Additionally, our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions
segment gross profit margin increased by 10.4 percentage points in the first quarter 2010 over the
first quarter 2009, to 41.8%. A total of $1.7 million, or 44.7%, of the gross profit increase was
driven by the increase in our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segments revenue that is spread over
the fixed cost components of our cost of sales, and $2.1 million, or 55.3%, of the gross profit
increase was driven by a more favorable mix of higher margin projects and favorable cost of sales
resulting from a focus on project cost management. Given that several projects with high gross
profit margins were nearing completion or were completed in the first quarter 2010, it is likely
that gross profit margins for this segment will be lower in the near-term compared to the first
quarter 2010.
The 6.7% decrease in our Energy Services segment costs of sales and services in the first
quarter 2010 is primarily the result of the costs avoided associated with the 6.5% decrease in its
sales and service revenues. Our Energy Services segment gross profit margin increased to 24.6% for
the first quarter 2010, compared to 24.4% during the first quarter 2009. The slight increase in
our Energy Services segment gross profit margin was due to improved efficiencies in the utilization
of field personnel in the first quarter 2010 compared to the first quarter 2009.
Our gross profit and gross profit margin have been, and we expect will continue to be,
affected by many factors, including the following:
33
|
|
|
The absolute level of revenue achieved in any particular period, given that portions
of our cost of sales are relatively fixed over the near-term; |
|
|
|
Our ability to improve our operating efficiency and benefit from economies of scale; |
|
|
|
Our ability to manage our materials and labor costs; |
|
|
|
The costs to maintain and operate distributed generation systems we own in
conjunction with recurring revenue contracts, including the price of fuel; |
|
|
|
The geographic density of our projects; |
|
|
|
The mix of higher and lower margin products and services; |
|
|
|
The selling price of products and services sold to customers, and the revenues we
expect to generate from recurring revenue projects; |
|
|
|
The price of oil and natural gas, the financial health of our customer base, and the
level of new oil and natural gas production activity in our operating geography; |
|
|
|
The rate of growth of our new businesses, which tend to incur costs in excess of
revenues in their earlier phases and then become profitable and more efficient over
time if they are successful; and |
|
|
|
Other factors described below under Fluctuations. |
Some of these factors are not within our control, and we cannot provide any assurance that we
can continue to improve upon those factors that are within our control, especially given the
current economic climate as well as our movement to an expected higher percentage of recurring
revenue projects. Moreover, our gross revenues are likely are likely to fluctuate from quarter to
quarter and from year to year, as discussed in Fluctuations below. Accordingly, there is no
assurance that our future gross profit margins will improve or even remain at historic levels in
the future, and will likely decrease if revenues decrease.
Operating Expenses
Our operating expenses include general and administrative expense, selling, marketing and
service expense, depreciation and amortization, and research and development. The following table
sets forth our consolidated operating expenses for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, |
|
|
Period-over-Period Difference |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Consolidated Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
$ |
7,326 |
|
|
$ |
6,040 |
|
|
$ |
1,286 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
% |
Selling, marketing and service |
|
|
1,053 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
26.7 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
9,036 |
|
|
$ |
7,413 |
|
|
$ |
1,623 |
|
|
|
21.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs related to personnel, including wages, stock compensation, bonuses and commissions,
are the most significant component of our operating expenses. During the first quarter 2010, we
expanded our investment in personnel driven by increasing levels of revenue, investments in new
business opportunities, and an increase in the number of expected projects. By contrast, in 2009,
as a result of
34
weak economic conditions, we took actions to control our costs and reduce our operating
expenses. These measures included staff reductions and compensation measures such as reductions in
certain bonus plans and other employee incentives, and other sales and general and administrative
spending reductions. In 2010 and beyond, if economic conditions continue to improve, we expect
demand for our business to expand allowing us to grow our business and to invest in future business
opportunities.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses include personnel
wages, benefits, stock compensation, and bonuses and related overhead costs for the support and
administrative functions. The 21.3% increase in our consolidated general and administrative
expenses in the first quarter 2010, as compared to the first quarter 2009, was due to investment in
personnel and other administrative expenses to support our increasing levels of revenue and
investments in new business opportunities. The following table provides further detail of our
general and administrative expenses by segment (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, |
|
|
Period-over-Period Difference |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Segment G&A Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy and Smart Grid Solutions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs |
|
$ |
3,450 |
|
|
$ |
2,922 |
|
|
$ |
528 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
% |
Vehicle lease and rental |
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
73.7 |
% |
Insurance |
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
-20.7 |
% |
Rent-office and equipment |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
% |
Professional fees and consulting |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
286.0 |
% |
Development costs |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
-5.0 |
% |
Travel |
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
35.5 |
% |
Other |
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
48.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Services |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
-18.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated Corporate Costs |
|
|
1,327 |
|
|
|
1,113 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,326 |
|
|
$ |
6,040 |
|
|
$ |
1,286 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment personnel costs during the
first quarter 2010, as compared to the first quarter 2009, was due to staffing increases to support
growth at our PowerSecure subsidiary. Other general and administrative expenses including vehicle
lease and rental, professional and consulting fees, travel and other expenses similarly increased
to support our growth and expectations regarding future growth. We expect our Energy and Smart
Grid Solutions general and administrative expenses to increase somewhat from our first quarter 2010
levels in the near-term as we continue to support the near-term growth of our business. Over the
long-term, we expect our expenses in these areas to further increase at our Energy and Smart Grid
Solutions segment as we continue to invest in and support long-term growth.
Our Energy Services segment general and administrative expenses include similar personnel and
related overhead costs incurred for the support and administrative functions of our Energy Services
segment. The decrease in our Energy Services segment general and administrative expense during the
first quarter 2010, as compared to the first quarter 2009 was due to actions taken in 2009 to
control our costs and reduce our operating expenses as a result of weak economic conditions and
continued relatively low natural gas prices which have negatively affected operations of our
Southern Flow subsidiary. We
35
expect general and administrative expenses at our Energy Services segment to increase over the
near-term as we take actions intended to stimulate growth in this segment. Over the long-term, we
expect anticipated growth initiatives at our Southern Flow subsidiary will increase its revenue
growth and expand its markets and business opportunities and will likely result in increased
general and administrative expenses in the future.
Unallocated corporate general and administrative expenses include similar personnel costs as
described above as well as costs incurred for the benefit of all of our business operations, such
as legal, Sarbanes-Oxley, public company reporting, director expenses, accounting costs, and stock
compensation expense on our stock options and restricted stock grants which we do not allocate to
our operating segments. Overall, these costs increased during the first quarter 2010 as compared
to the first quarter 2009 due to increased personnel costs, reinstatement of bonus compensation
that had been voluntarily waived in 2009, and stock compensation costs associated with the expected
achievement of 2010 performance targets associated with performance-based stock awards.
Selling, Marketing and Service Expenses. Selling, marketing and service expenses consist of
personnel and related overhead costs, including commissions for sales and marketing activities,
together with travel, advertising and promotion costs. The 26.7% increase in selling, marketing
and service expenses in the first quarter 2010, as compared to the first quarter 2009, was due to
increases in sales compensation expense driven by the current period increases in revenues as well
as increases in advertising, promotion, and travel to stimulate revenue growth and respond to an
increasing level of sales opportunities at our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment. The
following table provides further detail of our segment selling, marketing and service expenses
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, |
|
|
Period-over-Period Difference |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Segment Selling, Marketing and Service: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy and Smart Grid Solutions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
$ |
499 |
|
|
$ |
456 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
% |
Commission |
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
30.6 |
% |
Travel |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
27.9 |
% |
Advertising and promotion |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
216.2 |
% |
Bad debt expense (recovery) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
33.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Services |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,053 |
|
|
$ |
831 |
|
|
$ |
222 |
|
|
|
26.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the future, we expect our near-term and long-term Energy and Smart Grid Solutions
segment selling, marketing and services expenses to grow in order to reflect, drive and support
future growth.
Depreciation and Amortization Expenses. Depreciation and amortization expenses include the
depreciation of property, plant and equipment and the amortization of certain intangible assets
including capitalized software development costs and other intangible assets. The 21.2% increase in
depreciation and amortization expenses in the first quarter 2010, as compared to the first quarter
2009, primarily reflects depreciation and amortization of capital investments at both our Energy
and Smart Grid
Solutions segment and our Energy Services segment throughout 2009 and early 2010. As a result, we
incurred a $103, or 22.3%, increase in depreciation and amortization expense at our Energy and
Smart Grid
36
Solutions segment and a $12, or 19.7% increase in depreciation and amortization expenses at our
Energy Services segment in the first quarter 2010, compared to the first quarter 2009.
Other Income and Expenses
Our other income and expenses include equity income and management fees earned by our Energy
Services segment as managing trustee of MM 1995-2 relating to the WaterSecure operations, along
with interest income, interest expense and income taxes. The following table sets forth our other
income and expenses for the periods indicated, by segment (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, |
|
|
Period-over-Period Difference |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Other Segment Income and (Expenses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy and Smart Grid Solutions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income and other income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
|
-100.0 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
34.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment total |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity income |
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
115.9 |
% |
Management fees |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
46.7 |
% |
Interest income and other income |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment total |
|
|
1,186 |
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated Corporate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income and other income |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
-40.0 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
-6.0 |
% |
Income tax benefit (provision) |
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
-841.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment total |
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
849 |
|
|
$ |
437 |
|
|
$ |
412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Income. Equity income at our Energy Services segment consists of our minority
ownership interest in the earnings of the WaterSecure operations. Our equity income is a direct
function of the net income of the WaterSecure operations. During the first quarter 2010, our
equity income increased by $0.6 million, or 115.9%, over the first quarter 2009. The performance
of the WaterSecure operations, and our related equity income, was favorably affected by stabilizing
conditions in the natural gas markets and increases in oil prices in the first quarter 2010
compared to the first quarter 2009.
Management Fees. Management fees at our Energy Services segment consist entirely of fees we
earn as the managing trustee of the WaterSecure operations. These fees, to a large extent, are
based on a percentage of the revenues of the WaterSecure operations. Stabilizing conditions in the
natural gas markets and increases in oil prices in the first quarter 2010 compared to the first
quarter 2009, have positively affected the revenues of the WaterSecure operations in 2010. As a
direct result, our Energy Services segment management fees increased in the first quarter 2010 by
46.7% compared to the first quarter 2009.
Interest Income and Other Income. Interest income and other income for each segment consists
of interest we earn on the interest-bearing portion of our cash and cash equivalent balances.
In total, interest income and other income decreased by $21 during the first quarter 2010, as
compared to the first
37
quarter 2009. This decrease was attributable to a decline in our interest income resulting
from both a decline in our interest-bearing cash and cash equivalent balances as well as declining
interest rates earned on our cash and cash equivalent balances in the first quarter 2010 compared
to the first quarter 2009. Our future interest income will depend on our cash and cash equivalent
balances, which will increase and decrease depending upon our profit, capital expenditures, and our
working capital needs, and future interest rates.
Interest Expense. Interest expense for each segment consists of interest and finance charges
on our credit facilities and capital leases. In total, interest expense decreased by $33 during
the first quarter 2010, as compared to the first quarter 2009. The decrease in our Energy and
Smart Grid Solutions segment interest expense reflects the reduction in balances outstanding on our
capital lease obligation due to regular payments made on our capital leases over the preceding
year. We expect our future interest and finance charges to increase over time as a result of
anticipated borrowings under our credit facility to fund future working capital needs and recurring
revenue projects at our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment.
Income Taxes. Historically, our federal income tax expense has been modest, generally limited
to federal alternative minimum tax, because of our consolidated net operating losses in prior years
that were used to offset taxable income in current years. Our income tax provision includes the
effects of changes in the valuation allowance for our net deferred tax asset, state income taxes in
various state jurisdictions in which we have taxable activities, federal alternative minimum tax,
and expenses associated with uncertain tax positions that we have taken or expense reductions from
tax positions as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations. The increase in our
first quarter 2010 income tax provision compared to our the first quarter 2009 income tax provision
was due to our net income in the first quarter 2010 compared to our net loss in the first quarter
2009, and the resulting increases in both our federal alternative minimum tax and state income tax.
Noncontrolling Interest. Until April 30, 2010, we owned the controlling, but not the entire,
interest in EfficientLights, the financial results of which are consolidated into our financial
results. The noncontrolling members 33% interest in the income of EfficientLights is reflected as
a reduction of net income attributable to PowerSecure International, Inc. shareholders in our
consolidated statement of operations. The noncontrolling interest in the income of EfficientLights
increased by $0.2 million in the first quarter 2010 compared to the first quarter 2009 as a result
of the growth and profitability of EfficientLights commencing in 2009 and continuing into 2010.
Upon exercising our option to acquire the minority interest position in EfficientLights on April
30, 2010, there will be no further noncontrolling interest in EfficientLights reduction to net
income attributable to PowerSecure shareholders after that date.
Fluctuations
Our revenues, expenses, margins, net income, cash flow, cash, working capital debt, and
balance sheet positions, and other operating results have fluctuated significantly from
quarter-to-quarter, period-to-period and year-to-year in the past and are expected to continue to
fluctuate significantly in the future due to a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our
control. These factors include, without limitation, the following:
|
|
|
the effects of general economic conditions, including the current
significant downturn in the economy and financial crisis in the capital and credit
markets, and the strong likelihood of continuing future economic and market challenges
negatively impacting our business and our
|
38
|
|
|
revenues and profit, including the negative impact these conditions will have on the
timing of and amounts of orders from our customers, and on our access to capital to
finance our business; |
|
|
|
the size, timing and terms of sales and orders, including large customer
orders, as well as the effects of the timing of project phases of completion, customers
delaying, deferring or canceling purchase orders or making smaller purchases than
expected; |
|
|
|
our ability to increase our revenues through long-term recurring revenue
projects, recognizing that increasing revenues from recurring revenue projects will
require significant up-front capital expenditures and will protract revenue and profit
recognition, while increasing our gross margins over the long-term, as well as our
ability to sell, complete, and recognize satisfactory levels of quarterly revenue and
profits related to our project-based sales, in order to maintain current profits, cash
flow, and to satisfy our financial covenants in our debt facilities and successfully
finance the recurring portion of our business model; |
|
|
|
our ability to obtain adequate supplies of key components and materials of
suitable quality for our products on a timely and cost-effective basis, including the
impact of potential supply line constraints, substandard parts, and fluctuations in the
cost of raw materials and commodity prices; |
|
|
|
the performance of our products, services and technologies, and the
ability of our systems to meet the performance standards they are designed and built to
deliver to our customers, including but not limited to our recurring revenue projects
for which we retain the on-going risks associated with ownership of the systems; |
|
|
|
our ability to access significant capital resources on a timely basis in
order to fulfill large customer orders and finance capital required for recurring
revenue projects; |
|
|
|
our ability to implement our business plans and strategies and the timing
of such implementation; |
|
|
|
the pace of revenue and profit realization from our new businesses and the
development and growth of their markets; |
|
|
|
the timing, pricing and market acceptance of our new products and
services; |
|
|
|
changes in our pricing policies and those of our competitors; |
|
|
|
variations in the length of our sales cycle and product and service
delivery and construction process; |
|
|
|
changes in the mix of products and services having differing margins; |
|
|
|
changes in our operating expenses, including prices for materials, labor,
and other components of our products and services, warranty expense, fuel prices
(including diesel, natural gas, and gasoline, among others) and our ability to hedge
our fuel cost, exchange rates, as well as unforeseen or unanticipated expenses; |
|
|
|
changes in our valuation allowance for our net deferred tax asset, and the
resulting impact on current tax expense, future tax expense, and balance sheet account
balances; |
|
|
|
the effects of severe weather conditions, such as hurricanes, on the
business operations of our customers and the potential effect on our results of
operations; |
|
|
|
the life cycles of our products and services, and competitive alternatives
in the marketplace; |
|
|
|
budgeting cycles of utilities and other industrial, commercial, and
institutional customers,
|
39
|
|
|
including impacts of the current downturn in the economy and the difficult capital
markets and their impact on capital projects and other spending items; |
|
|
|
changes and uncertainties in the lead times required to obtain the
necessary permits and other governmental and regulatory approvals for projects; |
|
|
|
the development and maintenance of business relationships and on-going
sales with strategic partners, including utilities and large customers, and our ability
to continue to expand our customer base in each of our business areas due to being
dependent on a relatively small number of customers; |
|
|
|
economic conditions in the energy industry, especially in the natural gas
and electricity sectors including the effect of changes in energy prices and
electricity pricing and utility tariffs; |
|
|
|
changes in the prices charged by our suppliers; |
|
|
|
the effects of governmental regulations and regulatory changes in our
markets; |
|
|
|
the effects of litigation, claims and other proceedings; and |
|
|
|
our ability to make and obtain the expected benefits from acquisitions of
technology or businesses, and the costs related to such acquisitions. |
Because we have little or no control over most of these factors, our operating results are
difficult to predict. Any adverse change in any of these factors can negatively affect our
business and results of operations.
Our revenues and other operating results are heavily dependent upon the size and timing of
customer orders, payments, and the timing of the completion of those projects. The timing of large
individual sales, and of project completion, is difficult for us to predict. Because our operating
expenses are based on anticipated revenues and because a high percentage of these are relatively
fixed, a shortfall or delay in recognizing revenue could cause our operating results to vary
significantly from quarter-to-quarter and could result in significant operating losses or declines
in profit margins in any particular quarter. If our revenues fall below our expectations in any
particular quarter, we may not be able to reduce our expenses rapidly in response to the shortfall,
which could result in us suffering significant operating losses or declines in profit margins in
that quarter.
As we develop new related lines of business, our revenues and costs will fluctuate as it takes
time for revenues to develop, but also requires start-up expenses. Another factor that could cause
material fluctuations in our quarterly results is the amount of recurring, as opposed to
project-based, sources of revenue for our distributed generation projects. To date, the majority
of our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment revenues have consisted of project-based distributed
generation revenues, which are recognized as the project is completed. However, we have focused
marketing efforts on developing more sales under our recurring revenue model, for which the costs
and capital is invested initially and the related revenue and profit is recognized over the life of
the contract, generally five to fifteen years, and this delays recognition of revenue and net
income as we implement an increased number of these recurring revenue projects, particularly in the
near-term.
Our Energy Services segment operating results will vary as a result of fluctuations in energy
prices. For example, during 2007-2008 the high price of natural gas led to an increase in
production activity by Southern Flows customers, resulting in higher revenues and net income.
However, in 2009 declining prices of natural gas led to a decline in production activity by Southern Flows
customers,
40
resulting in reduced revenue growth and lower net income. Since energy prices tend to
be cyclical, rather than stable, future cyclical changes in energy prices are likely to affect our
Energy Services segments future revenues and net income. In addition, Southern Flows Gulf Coast
customers are exposed to the risks of hurricanes and tropical storms, which can cause fluctuations
in Southern Flows results of operations, adversely affecting results during hurricane season due
to the effects on our customers and operations, and then potentially enhancing results after the
season due to rebuilding and repair efforts which require our services. Results from our
WaterSecure operations also fluctuate significantly with changes in oil and natural gas prices and
oil and natural gas production in Colorado.
Due to all of these factors and the other risks discussed in this report and in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, quarter-to-quarter, period-to-period or
year-to-year comparisons of our results of operations should not be relied on as an indication of
our future performance. Quarterly, period or annual comparisons of our operating results are not
necessarily meaningful or indicative of future performance.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
We have historically financed our operations and growth primarily through a combination of
cash on hand, cash generated from operations, borrowings under credit facilities, leasing, and
proceeds from private and public sales of equity. On a going forward basis, we expect to require
capital primarily to finance our:
|
|
|
property and equipment expenditures, including capital expenditures related to
recurring revenue projects; |
|
|
|
additional equity investments in our WaterSecure operations; |
|
|
|
software purchases or development; |
|
|
|
debt service requirements; |
|
|
|
restructuring obligations; |
|
|
|
deferred compensation obligations; and |
|
|
|
business and technology acquisitions and other growth transactions. |
Working Capital
At March 31, 2010, we had working capital of $48.3 million, including $16.6 million in cash
and cash equivalents, compared to working capital of $48.2 million, including $20.2 million in cash
and cash equivalents. Changes in the components of our working capital from December 31, 2009 to
March 31, 2010 and from December 31, 2008 to March 31, 2009 are explained in greater detail below.
At both
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had $50.0 million of additional borrowing capacity
from our
41
undrawn credit facility. However, the availability of this capacity under our credit facility
includes restrictions on the use of proceeds, and is dependent upon our ability to satisfy certain
financial and operating covenants, as discussed below.
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes our cash flows for the periods indicated (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net cash flows used in operating activities |
|
$ |
(1,805 |
) |
|
$ |
(499 |
) |
Net cash flows used in investing activities |
|
|
(1,404 |
) |
|
|
(648 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(347 |
) |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(3,556 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,363 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Used in Operating Activities
Cash used in operating activities consists primarily of net income (loss) adjusted for certain
non-cash items including depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation expenses,
and equity income. Cash used in operating
activities also include cash distributions from our unconsolidated affiliate and the effect of
changes in working capital and other activities.
Cash used in operating activities of $1.8 million for the first quarter 2010 included the
effects of the following:
|
|
|
our net income of $1.4 million; |
|
|
|
non-cash charges of $0.7 million in depreciation and amortization; |
|
|
|
stock-based compensation expense of $0.5 million; |
|
|
|
cash distributions to the noncontrolling member of
EfficientLights of $0.6 million;
|
|
|
|
non-cash equity income from our WaterSecure operations of $1.0 million partially
offset by cash distributions from those operations of $0.8 million; |
|
|
|
an increase of $1.2 million in accounts receivable; |
|
|
|
an increase of $4.4 million in inventories; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.4million in other current assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
an increase of $5.3 million of accounts payable; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $3.5 million of accrued expenses; and |
|
|
|
cash payments of $0.2 million on our restructuring obligations. |
Cash used in operating activities of $0.5 million in the first quarter 2009 included the
effects of the following:
|
|
|
our net loss of $1.1 million; |
|
|
|
non-cash charges of $0.5 million in depreciation and amortization; |
|
|
|
stock-based compensation expense of $0.4 million;
|
42
|
|
|
cash distributions from our WaterSecure operations of $0.6 million partially offset
by non-cash equity income from those operations of $0.5 million; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $4.9 million in accounts receivable; |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.8 million in inventories; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.6 million in other current assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
a decrease of $2.0 million of accounts payable; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $2.6 million of accrued expenses; and |
|
|
|
cash payments of $0.5 million on our restructuring obligations. |
Cash Used in Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities was $1.4 million and $0.6 million for the first quarter 2010
and first quarter 2009, respectively. Historically, our principal cash investments have related to
the purchase of equipment used in our production facilities, the acquisitions of certain contract
rights, the acquisition and installation of equipment related to our recurring revenue sales, and
the acquisition of businesses or technologies. During the first quarter 2010, we used $0.5 million
to purchase and install equipment at our recurring revenue distributed generation sites and $0.6
million at our PowerSecure and Southern Flow subsidiaries principally to acquire operational
assets. During the first quarter 2009, we used $0.4 million to purchase and install equipment at
our recurring revenue distributed generation sites and $0.2 million at our PowerSecure and Southern
Flow subsidiaries principally to acquire operational assets.
Cash Used in Financing Activities
Cash used in financing activities was $0.3 million in the first quarter 2010 and cash used in
financing activities was $0.2 million in the first quarter 2009. During the first quarter 2010, we
used $0.2 million to repay our capital lease obligations. During the first quarter 2009, we used
$0.2 million to repay our capital lease obligations.
Capital Spending
Our capital expenditures during the first quarter 2010 were approximately $1.4 million, of
which we used $0.5 million to purchase and install equipment at our recurring revenue distributed
generation sites, and $0.6 million to purchase equipment and other capital items at our PowerSecure
and Southern Flow subsidiaries. Our capital expenditures during the first quarter 2009 were
approximately $0.6 million, of which we used $0.4 million to purchase and install equipment at our
recurring revenue distributed generation sites, and $0.2 million to purchase equipment and other
capital items at our PowerSecure and Southern Flow subsidiaries.
We anticipate making capital expenditures of approximately $15 million in 2010, although
customer demand for our Interactive Distributed Generation systems under recurring revenue contract
arrangements, and economic and financial conditions could cause us to reduce or increase those
capital expenditures. The vast majority of our capital spending has to date been and will continue
to be used for investments in assets related to our recurring revenue projects as well as equipment
to support the growth of our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment.
43
Indebtedness
Line of Credit. We have an existing credit agreement with Citibank, N.A., as the
administrative agent, and SunTrust Bank and BB&T, providing for a $50.0 million senior,
first-priority secured revolving and term credit facility. Obligations under the credit facility
are guaranteed by all of our active subsidiaries and secured by all of our assets and the assets of
our active subsidiaries.
We may, from time to time, request an increase in the aggregate revolving commitment amount by
up to $15.0 million without the prior consent of the lenders provided that each lender has the
unilateral right to determine whether it agrees to increase its revolving commitment and that no
lender is required to increase its individual pro rata commitment amount without such lenders
consent.
The credit facility, as a revolving credit facility, matures and terminates on November 13,
2011. However, we have the option prior to that maturity date to convert a portion of outstanding
principal balance, in an amount not to exceed the present value of estimated annual contract
revenues receivable under the initial term of contracts for recurring revenue projects executed
after December 31, 2007, into a non-revolving term loan for a two year period expiring November 12,
2013, making quarterly payments based upon a four year fully amortized basis.
We intend to use the proceeds available under the credit facility to finance our PowerSecure
subsidiarys recurring revenue projects as well as to finance capital expenditures, working
capital, acquisitions, and general corporate purposes. Our outstanding borrowings under the credit
facility at any time, the proceeds of which were used for working capital purposes and not in
connection with recurring revenue projects, cannot exceed $15.0 million.
Outstanding balances under the credit facility bear interest, at our discretion, at either the
London Interbank Offered Rate for the corresponding deposits of U. S. Dollars plus an applicable
margin, which is on a sliding scale ranging from 175 basis points to 300 basis points based upon
the our leverage ratio, or at Citibanks alternate base rate plus an applicable margin, on a
sliding scale ranging from 0 basis points to 125 basis points based upon our leverage ratio. Our
leverage ratio is the ratio of our funded indebtedness as of a given date to our consolidated
EBITDA as defined in the credit agreement for the four consecutive quarters ending on such date.
Citibanks alternate base rate is equal to the higher of the Federal Funds Rate as published by the
Federal Reserve of New York plus 0.50%, and Citibanks prime commercial lending rate.
The credit facility is not subject to any borrowing base computations or limitations, but does
contain certain financial covenants. Our maximum leverage ratio cannot exceed 3.25. Our minimum
fixed charge coverage ratio must be in excess of 1.50, where the fixed charge coverage ratio is
defined as the ratio of the aggregate of our trailing 12 month consolidated EBITDA plus our lease
or rent expense minus our taxes based on income and payable in cash, divided by the sum of our
consolidated interest charges plus our lease or rent expenses plus our scheduled principal payments
and dividends, computed over the previous period. Also, our minimum asset coverage must be in
excess of 1.25, where our asset coverage is defined as the summation of 80% of the book value of
accounts receivable plus 60% of the book value of inventory plus 50% of the book value of net fixed
assets, divided by total funded debt outstanding. In addition, we are required to maintain a
minimum consolidated tangible net worth, computed on a quarterly basis, equal to approximately
$42.8 million, plus 50% of our net income each year ending after December 31, 2007, with no
reduction for any net loss in any year, plus 100% of any equity we raise through the sale of equity
interests, less the amount of any non-cash charges or losses.
Finally, our debt to worth ratio, which is the ratio of our total consolidated indebtedness to
our consolidated tangible net worth, cannot exceed 1.5 to 1.0 at the end of any quarter. At March
31, 2010,
44
we were in compliance with these financial covenants.
Under the credit facility, our cumulative capital expenditures beginning in 2008 cannot exceed
the sum of $5.0 million plus $1.25 million per quarter, on a cumulative basis, plus an allowance
for our PowerSecure subsidiary recurring revenue projects generated after December 31, 2007. The
credit facility contains other representations and warranties and affirmative and negative
covenants, including restrictions with respect to liens, indebtedness, loans and investments,
material changes in our business, asset sales or leases or transfers of assets, restricted payments
such as distributions and dividends, mergers or consolidations and transactions with affiliates.
Upon the sale of any of our assets or the assets of our subsidiaries other than in the
ordinary course of business or the public or private sale of any of our equity or debt or the
equity or debt of our subsidiaries other than equity issuances where the aggregate net equity
proceeds do not exceed $10.0 million, we are required to use the net proceeds thereof to repay any
indebtedness then outstanding under the credit facility, except for certain reinvestment
provisions.
Our obligations under the credit facility are secured by guarantees and security agreements by
each of our active subsidiaries, including but not limited to our PowerSecure subsidiary, Southern
Flow and WaterSecure. The guarantees guaranty all of our obligations under the credit facility,
and the security agreements grant to the lenders a first priority security interest in virtually
all of the assets of each of the parties to the credit agreement.
The credit agreement also contains customary events of default, including payment defaults,
breach of representations and warranties, covenant defaults, cross-defaults, certain bankruptcy or
insolvency events, judgment defaults and certain ERISA-related events.
At March 31, 2010, there were no balances outstanding under the credit facility and we had
$50.0 million available to borrow. However, the availability of this capital under our credit
facility includes restrictions on the use of proceeds, and is dependent upon our ability to satisfy
certain financial and operating covenants, as described above.
Capital Lease Obligations. In December 2008, we entered into a sale and leaseback transaction
with SunTrust Equipment Finance and Leasing, an affiliate of SunTrust bank, resulting in the sale
of distributed generation equipment placed in service at customer locations and a lease of the
equipment from SunTrust. We received $5.9 million from the sale of the equipment which we are
repaying under the terms of the lease with monthly payments of $0.1 million of principal and
interest over a period of 84 months. At the expiration of the term of the lease, we have the
option to purchase the equipment for $1, assuming no default under the lease by us has occurred and
is then continuing. The lease is guaranteed by us under an equipment lease guaranty. The lease
and the lease guaranty constitute permitted indebtedness under our current credit agreement, under
which an affiliate of the lessor is one of the lenders.
Proceeds of the lease financing have been and continue to be used to finance our PowerSecure
subsidiarys recurring revenue projects as well as to finance capital expenditures and working
capital. We account for the lease financing as a capital lease in our consolidated financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
The lease provides our PowerSecure subsidiary with limited rights, subject to the lessors
approval which will not be unreasonably withheld, to relocate and substitute equipment during its
term. The lease contains customary representations and warranties, covenants relating to the use and
45
maintenance of the equipment, indemnification, events of default, including payment defaults,
breach of representations and warranties, covenant defaults, cross-defaults, certain bankruptcy or
insolvency events, customary for leases of this nature. The lease also grants to the lessor
certain remedies upon a default, including the right to cancel the lease, to accelerate all rent
payments for the remainder of the term of the lease, to recover liquidated damages, or to repossess
and re-lease, sell or otherwise dispose of the equipment.
Under the lease guaranty, we have unconditionally guaranteed the obligations of our
PowerSecure subsidiary under the lease for the benefit of the lessor.
Our capital lease obligations at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $5.0 million and $5.2
million, respectively, and consist of our obligations under the equipment lease described above as
well as various other miscellaneous lease obligations.
Restructuring Obligations. During 2007, we incurred restructuring charges for severance and
associated costs related to certain organizational changes focused on accelerating our growth, and
especially the growth of our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment. The remaining balance of our
payment obligations at March 31, 2010 in the amount of $0.1 million relating to these
organizational changes, which balance consists entirely of severance costs to our former Chief
Executive Officer, will be paid in April 2010.
Preferred Stock Redemption. The terms of our Series B preferred stock required us to redeem
all shares of our Series B preferred stock that remained outstanding on December 9, 2004 at a
redemption price equal to the liquidation preference of $1,000 per share plus accumulated and
unpaid dividends. Our remaining redemption obligation at March 31, 2010, to holders of outstanding
shares of Series B preferred stock that have not been redeemed, is $0.1 million.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
We incur various contractual obligations and commercial commitments in our normal course
of business. We lease certain office space, operating facilities and equipment under long-term
lease agreements; to the extent we borrow under our credit facility, we are obligated to make
future payments under that facility; we have a deferred compensation obligation; we incurred
restructuring obligations in 2007; and in 2009 we entered into a non-compete agreement providing
for on-going payments. At March 31, 2010, we also have a liability for unrecognized tax benefits
and related interest and penalties totaling $1.5 million. We do not expect a significant payment
related to these obligations within the next year and we are unable to make a reasonably reliable
estimate if and when cash settlement with a taxing authority would occur. Accordingly, the
information in the table below, which is as of March 31, 2010, does not include the liability for
unrecognized tax benefits (dollars in thousands):
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
of 2010 |
|
|
1 - 3 Years |
|
|
4 - 5 Years |
|
|
5 Years |
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit facility (1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Capital lease obligations (2) |
|
|
5,843 |
|
|
|
763 |
|
|
|
2,033 |
|
|
|
2,032 |
|
|
|
1,015 |
|
Operating leases |
|
|
4,423 |
|
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
1,936 |
|
|
|
1,352 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
Deferred compensation (3) |
|
|
2,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,661 |
|
Non-compete agreement |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
Restructuring obligations |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B preferred stock |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,608 |
|
|
$ |
1,891 |
|
|
$ |
4,169 |
|
|
$ |
3,584 |
|
|
$ |
3,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total repayments are based upon borrowings outstanding as of March 31, 2010, not actual
or projected borrowings after such date. Repayments do not include interest that may
become due and payable in any future period. |
|
(2) |
|
Repayment amounts include interest on the capital lease obligation. |
|
(3) |
|
Total amount represents our expected obligation on the deferred compensation
arrangement and does not include the value of the restricted annuity contract, or interest
earnings thereon, that we purchased to fund our obligation. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
During the first quarter 2010, we did not engage in any material off-balance sheet activities
or have any relationships or arrangements with unconsolidated entities established for the purpose
of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
Further, we have not guaranteed any obligations of unconsolidated entities nor do we have any
commitment or intent to provide additional funding to any such entities.
Liquidity
Based upon our plans and assumptions as of the date of this report, we believe that our
capital resources, including our cash and cash equivalents, amounts available under our credit
facility, along with funds expected to be generated from our operations, will be sufficient to meet
our anticipated cash needs, including for working capital, capital spending and debt service
commitments, for at least the next 12 months. However, any projections of future cash needs and
cash flows are subject to substantial risks and uncertainties. See Cautionary Note Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements below in this item and Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors below.
Although we believe that we have sufficient capital to fund our activities for at least the next 12
months, our future cash resources and capital requirements may vary materially from those now
planned. Our ability to meet our capital needs in the future will depend on many factors,
including the effects of the current economic and financial crisis, the timing of sales, the mix of
products, the amount of recurring revenue projects, our ability to meet our financial covenants
under our credit facility, unanticipated events over which we have not control increasing our
operating costs or reducing our revenues beyond our current expectations, and other factors listed
under Fluctuations above. For these reasons, we cannot provide any assurance that our actual cash
47
requirements will not be greater than we currently expect or that these sources of liquidity will
be available when needed.
We also continually evaluate opportunities to expand our current, or to develop new, products,
services, technology and businesses that could increase our capital needs. In addition, from time
to time we consider the acquisition of, or the investment in, complementary businesses, products,
services and technology that might affect our liquidity requirements. We may seek to raise any
needed or desired additional capital from the proceeds of public or private equity or debt
offerings at the parent level or at the subsidiary level or both, from asset or business sales,
from traditional credit financings or from other financing sources. In addition, we continually
evaluate opportunities to improve our credit facilities, through increased credit availability,
lower debt costs or other more favorable terms. However, our ability to obtain additional capital
or replace or improve our credit facilities when needed or desired will depend on many factors,
including general economic and market conditions, our operating performance and investor and lender
sentiment, and thus cannot be assured. In addition, depending on how it is structured, a financing
could require the consent of our current lending group. Even if we are able to raise additional
capital, the terms of any financings could be adverse to the interests of our stockholders. For
example, the terms of a debt financing could restrict our ability to operate our business or to
expand our operations, while the terms of an equity financing, involving the issuance of capital
stock or of securities convertible into capital stock, could dilute the percentage ownership
interests of our stockholders, and the new capital stock or other new securities could have rights,
preferences or privileges senior to those of our current stockholders. We cannot provide any
assurance that sufficient additional funds will be available to us when needed or desired or that,
if available, such funds can be obtained on terms favorable to us and our stockholders and
acceptable to those parties who must consent to the financing. Our inability to obtain sufficient
additional capital on a timely basis on favorable terms when needed or desired could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Critical Accounting Policies
Managements discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are
based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these
financial statements requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the reporting period. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to
revenue recognition and percentage of completion, fixed price contracts, product returns, warranty
obligations, bad debt, inventories, cancellations costs associated with long term commitments,
investments, intangible assets, assets subject to disposal, income taxes, restructuring, service
contracts, contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on
various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of
which form the basis for making estimates and judgments about the carrying value of assets and
liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Estimates, by their nature, are
based on judgment and available information. Therefore, actual results could differ from those
estimates and could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
We have identified the accounting principles which we believe are most critical to
understanding our reported financial results by considering accounting policies that involve the
most complex or subjective decisions or assessments. These accounting policies described below
include:
48
|
|
|
revenue recognition; |
|
|
|
|
allowance for doubtful accounts; |
|
|
|
|
inventories; |
|
|
|
|
warranty reserve; |
|
|
|
|
impairment of long-lived assets; |
|
|
|
|
deferred tax valuation allowance; |
|
|
|
|
uncertain tax positions; |
|
|
|
|
costs of exit or disposal activities and similar nonrecurring charges; and |
|
|
|
|
stock-based compensation. |
These accounting policies are described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009 in Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting for Transfers of Financial AssetsIn June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance on
the accounting for the transfers of financial assets. The new guidance, which is now part of ASC
860, Transfers and Servicing, requires additional disclosures for transfers of financial assets,
including securitization transactions, and any continuing exposure to the risks related to
transferred financial assets. There is no longer a concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity,
and the requirements for derecognizing financial assets have changed. The adoption of the new
guidance on January 1, 2010 had no effect on our financial position or results of operations or on
our financial statement disclosures.
Variable Interest EntitiesIn June 2009, the FASB issued revised guidance on the accounting
for variable interest entities. The revised guidance, which is now part of ASC 810-10,
Consolidation, reflects the elimination of the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and
replaces the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation of the previous guidance for
determining which company, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest
entity. The revised guidance requires an analysis of whether a company has: (1) the power to
direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entitys
economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb the losses that could potentially be
significant to the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially
be significant to the entity. An entity is required to be re-evaluated as a variable interest
entity when the holders of the equity investment at risk, as a group, lose the power from voting
rights or similar rights to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entitys
economic performance. Additional disclosures are required about a companys involvement in
variable interest entities and an ongoing assessment of whether a company is the primary
beneficiary. The adoption of the new guidance on January 1, 2010 had no effect on our financial
position or results of operations or on our financial statement disclosures.
49
Multiple Deliverable Revenue ArrangementsIn October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13,
Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements A Consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force,
which updates ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. ASU No. 2009-13 provides application guidance on
whether multiple deliverables exist, how the deliverables should be separated and how the
consideration should be allocated to one or more units of accounting. This update establishes a
selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. The selling price used
for each deliverable will be based on vendor-specific objective evidence, if available, third-party
evidence if vendor-specific objective evidence is not available, or estimated selling price if
neither vendor-specific or third-party evidence is available. We will be required to apply the new
guidance prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified after January
1, 2011; however, early application is permitted. We are currently evaluating the effect that this
update may have on our financial position or results of operations or on our financial statement
disclosures.
Software Elements in Revenue ArrangementsIn October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-14,
Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements, updating ASC 985, Software. This
update provides new standards that amend the scope of previous software revenue guidance by
excluding non-software components of tangible products and certain software components of tangible
products. These new standards are effective for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2011; however,
early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the effect that this update may have on
our financial position or results of operations or on our financial statement disclosures.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to certain market risks arising from transactions we enter into in the ordinary
course of business. These market risks are primarily due to changes in interest rates and
commodity prices, which may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and
cash flow.
Interest Rate Risk. Our exposure to market risk resulting from changes in interest rates
relates primarily to income from our investments in short-term interest-bearing marketable
securities, which is dependent upon the interest rate of the securities held, and to interest
expenses attributable to our credit facility, which is based on floating interest rates as
described in Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations of this report. Our lease with SunTrust is at a fixed interest rate and thus not
impacted by changes in interest rates.
At March 31, 2010, our cash and cash equivalent balance was approximately $16.6 million and
our credit facility had a zero balance. Our cash equivalents are invested in either bank deposits,
money market or U.S. government mutual funds, short-term time deposits, and government agency and
corporate obligations, or similar kinds of instruments, the income of which generally increases or
decreases in proportion to increases or decreases, respectively, in interest rates. We do not
believe that changes in interest rates have had a material impact on us in the past or are likely
to have a material impact on us in the foreseeable future. For example, a change of 1% (100 basis
points) in the interest rate on either our investments or any future reasonably likely borrowings
would not have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flow.
While we believe we have our cash and cash equivalents invested in relatively risk-free
investments, the current capital market crisis make it difficult to accurately assess the risk of
each of our holdings. This risk includes, but is not limited to, bank deposits in excess of FDIC
insurance limits.
Commodity Price Risk. From time to time we are subject to market risk from fluctuating
commodity prices in certain raw materials we use in our products and diesel fuel we use to power
our generators. To date, in our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment, we have managed this
risk by
50
using alternative raw materials acceptable to our customers or we have been able to pass
these cost increases to our customers. While we do not believe that changes in commodity prices
have had a material impact on us in the past, commodity price fluctuations could have a material
impact on us in the future, depending on the magnitude and timing of such fluctuations. The impact
of these fluctuations could result in an increase in our operating costs and expenses and reduction
in our gross margins and income due to increases in the price and costs of engines, generators,
copper, aluminum, electrical components, labor, electricity, diesel fuel, gasoline, oil and natural
gas. In our Energy Services segment, we have on-going commodity price risk primarily related to
the price of oil and natural gas. Movements in prices of these commodities can materially impact
our results in this segment.
Foreign Exchange Risk. Since substantially all of our revenues, expenses and capital spending
are transacted in U.S. dollars, we face minimal exposure to adverse movements in foreign currency
exchange rates. However, as our international operations expand in the future as we expect, then
our exposure to foreign currency risks will increase, which could affect our business. In
addition, because our EfficientLights business purchases component parts manufactured in China,
then to the extent the U.S. Dollar exchange rate with the Chinese Yuan changes significantly, our
business and results could be materially impacted.
We do not use derivative financial instruments to manage or hedge our exposure to interest
rate changes, foreign currency exchange risks or other market risks, or for trading or other
speculative purposes.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial
Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of March 31, 2010, the end of the period covered
by this report. Based upon managements evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer have concluded that, as of March 31, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures
were designed at the reasonable assurance level and were effective at the reasonable assurance
level to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports
that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We regularly review our system of internal control over financial reporting and make changes to our
processes and systems to improve controls and increase efficiency, while ensuring that we maintain
an effective internal control environment. Changes may include such activities as implementing new,
more efficient systems, consolidating activities and migrating processes. There were no changes in
our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under
the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
51
Limitations in Control Systems
Our controls and procedures were designed at the reasonable assurance level. However, because
of inherent limitations, any system of controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and
operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving the desired objectives
of the control system. In addition, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that
there are resource constraints, and management must apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits
of controls relative to their costs. Further, no evaluation of controls and procedures can provide
absolute assurance that all errors, control issues and instances of fraud will be prevented or
detected. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion
of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of
controls and procedures is also based in part on certain assumptions regarding the likelihood of
future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated
goals under all potential future conditions.
52
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we are involved in disputes and legal proceedings. There has been no
material change in our pending legal proceedings as described in Item 3. Legal Proceedings in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Our business and operating results are subject to many risks, uncertainties and other factors.
If any of these risks were to occur, our business, affairs, assets, financial condition, results
of operations, cash flows and prospects could be materially and adversely affected. These risks,
uncertainties and other factors include the information discussed elsewhere in this report as well
as the risk factors set forth in Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, which have not materially changed as of the date of this
report.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
(31.1)
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Filed herewith.) |
|
|
|
(31.2)
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Filed herewith.) |
|
|
|
(32.1)
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Filed herewith.) |
|
|
|
(32.2)
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Filed herewith.) |
53
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
POWERSECURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
|
|
Date: May 6, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Sidney Hinton
|
|
|
|
Sidney Hinton |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 6, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Christopher T. Hutter
|
|
|
|
Christopher T. Hutter |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Assistant Secretary |
|
|
54