e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
Commission file number 001-34435
EMDEON INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
20-5799664
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
3055 Lebanon Pike, Suite 1000
Nashville, TN
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
37214
(Zip Code) |
(615) 932-3000
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yesþ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer þ |
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date:
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding as of August 5, 2011 |
|
|
|
Class A common stock, $0.00001 par value
|
|
91,208,582 |
Class B common stock, $0.00001 par value
|
|
24,689,142 |
Emdeon Inc.
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
2
Emdeon Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
ASSETS |
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
122,460 |
|
|
$ |
99,188 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $5,523
and $5,394 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
184,992 |
|
|
|
174,191 |
|
Deferred income tax assets |
|
|
7,811 |
|
|
|
7,913 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
25,410 |
|
|
|
25,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
340,673 |
|
|
|
306,312 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
230,979 |
|
|
|
231,307 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
926,164 |
|
|
|
908,310 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
1,007,194 |
|
|
|
1,035,886 |
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
8,825 |
|
|
|
9,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,513,835 |
|
|
$ |
2,491,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
6,379 |
|
|
$ |
4,732 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
105,429 |
|
|
|
112,245 |
|
Deferred revenues |
|
|
12,547 |
|
|
|
12,130 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
12,492 |
|
|
|
12,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
136,847 |
|
|
|
141,601 |
|
Long-term debt, excluding current portion |
|
|
936,222 |
|
|
|
933,749 |
|
Deferred income tax liabilities |
|
|
201,528 |
|
|
|
200,357 |
|
Tax receivable agreement obligations to related parties |
|
|
137,964 |
|
|
|
138,533 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
15,165 |
|
|
|
22,037 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock (par value, $0.00001), 25,000,000 shares authorized and
0 shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock (par value, $0.00001), 400,000,000 shares authorized
and 91,208,582 and 91,064,486 shares outstanding at June 30, 2011
and December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Class B common stock, exchangeable (par value, $0.00001), 52,000,000 shares
authorized and 24,689,142 shares outstanding at June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
749,536 |
|
|
|
738,888 |
|
Contingent consideration |
|
|
1,955 |
|
|
|
1,955 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(1,280 |
) |
|
|
(2,569 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
63,444 |
|
|
|
53,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emdeon Inc. equity |
|
|
813,656 |
|
|
|
791,525 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
272,453 |
|
|
|
263,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
1,086,109 |
|
|
|
1,055,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
2,513,835 |
|
|
$ |
2,491,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Emdeon Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
282,110 |
|
|
$ |
243,289 |
|
|
$ |
553,608 |
|
|
$ |
480,568 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization below) |
|
|
174,757 |
|
|
|
148,444 |
|
|
|
344,011 |
|
|
|
292,430 |
|
Development and engineering |
|
|
9,358 |
|
|
|
8,695 |
|
|
|
18,260 |
|
|
|
17,248 |
|
Sales, marketing, general and administrative |
|
|
31,498 |
|
|
|
26,243 |
|
|
|
63,145 |
|
|
|
52,362 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
38,934 |
|
|
|
29,278 |
|
|
|
76,956 |
|
|
|
57,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
27,563 |
|
|
|
30,629 |
|
|
|
51,236 |
|
|
|
61,475 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
12,653 |
|
|
|
15,919 |
|
|
|
25,282 |
|
|
|
31,584 |
|
Other |
|
|
(2,235 |
) |
|
|
(2,060 |
) |
|
|
(3,638 |
) |
|
|
(1,770 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
|
17,148 |
|
|
|
16,775 |
|
|
|
29,598 |
|
|
|
31,669 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
7,920 |
|
|
|
9,520 |
|
|
|
13,095 |
|
|
|
20,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
9,228 |
|
|
|
7,255 |
|
|
|
16,503 |
|
|
|
11,517 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
3,427 |
|
|
|
3,026 |
|
|
|
6,309 |
|
|
|
5,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Emdeon Inc. |
|
$ |
5,801 |
|
|
$ |
4,229 |
|
|
$ |
10,194 |
|
|
$ |
6,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share Class A common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
91,057,293 |
|
|
|
90,061,975 |
|
|
|
91,022,516 |
|
|
|
89,879,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
91,341,309 |
|
|
|
90,759,030 |
|
|
|
91,294,114 |
|
|
|
90,648,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Emdeon Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A |
|
|
Class B |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Contingent |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Controlling |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Consideration |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance at January 1, 2010 |
|
|
90,423,941 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
24,752,955 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
730,941 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
33,704 |
|
|
$ |
(11,198 |
) |
|
$ |
226,421 |
|
|
$ |
979,869 |
|
Equity-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,587 |
|
|
|
7,847 |
|
Issuance of shares in connection with
equity compensation plans, net of taxes |
|
|
39,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
Exchange of units of EBS Master for Class A
common stock, net of taxes |
|
|
36,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,829 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(339 |
) |
|
|
82 |
|
Cancellation of Class B common stock,
net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,984 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
Issuance of Class A common stock in
connection with acquisitions, net of taxes |
|
|
361,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,279 |
|
|
|
2,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
7,813 |
|
Tax receivable agreement with related parties,
net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
Contribution of data sublicense intangible
to EBS Master |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(861 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,358 |
|
|
|
497 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,399 |
|
|
|
11,517 |
|
Change in the fair value of
interest rate swap, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,058 |
|
|
|
834 |
|
|
|
3,892 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Other comprehensive income amortization,
net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,997 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
2,541 |
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,001 |
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
90,861,910 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
24,689,142 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
741,295 |
|
|
$ |
2,667 |
|
|
$ |
39,822 |
|
|
$ |
(6,116 |
) |
|
$ |
236,411 |
|
|
$ |
1,014,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2011 |
|
|
91,064,486 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
24,689,142 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
738,888 |
|
|
$ |
1,955 |
|
|
|
53,250 |
|
|
$ |
(2,569 |
) |
|
$ |
263,763 |
|
|
$ |
1,055,288 |
|
Equity-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,367 |
|
|
|
11,483 |
|
Issuance of shares in connection with
equity compensation plans, net of taxes |
|
|
144,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
1,255 |
|
Tax receivable agreements with related parties,
net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,309 |
|
|
|
16,503 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Other comprehensive income
amortization, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,293 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
1,643 |
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,141 |
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
91,208,582 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
24,689,142 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
749,536 |
|
|
$ |
1,955 |
|
|
$ |
63,444 |
|
|
$ |
(1,280 |
) |
|
$ |
272,453 |
|
|
$ |
1,086,109 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Emdeon Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited and amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
16,503 |
|
|
$ |
11,517 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
76,956 |
|
|
|
57,053 |
|
Equity compensation expense |
|
|
11,483 |
|
|
|
7,847 |
|
Deferred income tax expense |
|
|
2,058 |
|
|
|
7,250 |
|
Amortization of debt discount and issuance costs |
|
|
6,945 |
|
|
|
6,300 |
|
Amortization of discontinued cash flow hedge from other comprehensive loss |
|
|
1,879 |
|
|
|
2,918 |
|
Change in contingent consideration |
|
|
(3,638 |
) |
|
|
(1,770 |
) |
Change in fair value of interest rate swap (not subject to hedge accounting) |
|
|
(5,163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(8,819 |
) |
|
|
814 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
2,360 |
|
|
|
1,909 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
3,925 |
|
|
|
(1,550 |
) |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
(456 |
) |
Deferred revenues |
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
(1,190 |
) |
Tax receivable agreement obligations to related parties |
|
|
(2,913 |
) |
|
|
(1,480 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
102,408 |
|
|
|
89,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(34,088 |
) |
|
|
(35,772 |
) |
Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(39,758 |
) |
|
|
(41,991 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(73,846 |
) |
|
|
(80,763 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt principal payments |
|
|
(4,275 |
) |
|
|
(3,775 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(1,015 |
) |
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(5,290 |
) |
|
|
(3,879 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
23,272 |
|
|
|
4,470 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
99,188 |
|
|
|
211,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
122,460 |
|
|
$ |
216,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
1. Nature of Business and Organization
Nature of Business
Emdeon Inc. (the Company), through its subsidiaries and affiliates, is a provider of revenue
and payment cycle management and clinical exchange solutions, connecting payers, providers and
patients of the U.S. healthcare system. The Companys solutions integrate and automate key business
and administrative functions for payers and providers throughout the patient encounter, including
pre-care patient eligibility and benefits verification and enrollment, clinical exchange
capabilities, claims management and adjudication, payment integrity, payment distribution, payment
posting and denial management and patient billing and payment processing.
Organizational Structure
Prior to November 2006, the group of companies that comprised Emdeon Business Services (EBS)
was owned by HLTH Corporation, currently known as WebMD Health Corp. (WebMD). EBS Master LLC
(EBS Master) was formed by WebMD to act as a holding company for EBS. EBS Master, through its
100% owned subsidiary, Emdeon Business Services LLC (EBS LLC), owns EBS.
In September 2006, EBS Acquisition LLC (EBS Acquisition) was formed as a Delaware limited
liability company by affiliates of General Atlantic LLC (General Atlantic). In November 2006, EBS
Acquisition acquired a 52% interest in EBS Master from WebMD (the 2006 Transaction).
In February 2008, WebMD sold its 48% noncontrolling interest in EBS Master to affiliates of
General Atlantic and Hellman & Friedman LLC (H&F) (the 2008 Transaction). As a result,
following the 2008 Transaction, EBS Master was owned 65.77% by affiliates of General Atlantic
(including EBS Acquisition) and 34.23% by affiliates of H&F.
In connection with the Companys August 2009 initial public offering (IPO), EBS Acquisition
was converted into a Delaware corporation, changed its name to Emdeon Inc. and completed a
corporate restructuring.
2. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant New Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and
with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X and, in the opinion of
management, reflect all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of results
for the unaudited interim periods presented. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally
included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles have been condensed or omitted. The results of operations for the interim period are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be obtained for the full fiscal year. All material
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period financial statements to conform
to the current period presentation.
7
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
On December 31, 2010, the Company early adopted the clarification and additional disclosure
provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Update No.
2010-29, an update to FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Business Combination Topic.
This update, which is applicable to public entities, clarifies that required pro forma financial
information should be presented with an assumption that any current period acquisition occurred as
of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. Additionally, this update
expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of
material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination
included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The adoption of this update had no
material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
On January 1, 2010, the Company adopted the clarification and additional disclosure provisions
of FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06, an update to FASB ASC Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures Topic. On January 1, 2011, the Company adopted the remaining provisions of this update
with respect to the separate disclosure of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements relating to
Level 3 fair value measurements. This update clarifies that companies must provide fair value
measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities and expands the requirements to
include disclosure of amounts and reasons for transfers among different levels within the fair
value hierarchy and information within a reconciliation about purchases, sales, issuances and
settlements on a gross basis. The adoption of this update had no material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements. The disclosures required by this update are presented within
Note 8 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
On January 1, 2011, the Company adopted FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-13, an
update to FASB ASC Revenue Recognition Topic, which amends existing accounting standards for
revenue recognition for multiple-element arrangements. To the extent a deliverable within a
multiple-element arrangement is not accounted for pursuant to other accounting standards, the
update establishes a selling price hierarchy that allows for the use of an estimated selling price
to determine the allocation of arrangement consideration to a deliverable in a multiple-element
arrangement where neither vendor-specific objective evidence nor third-party evidence is available
for that deliverable. The adoption of this update had no material effect on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04, an update to FASB ASC
Fair Value Measurements Topic, which clarifies the intent of the FASB regarding existing
requirements, changes certain principles for measuring fair value and expands the disclosure
requirements related to fair value measurements. Specifically, this update expands the restriction
on the use of block discounts to all fair value measurements and provides conditions which must be
satisfied prior to the application of other premiums and discounts (e.g., control premiums and
discounts for lack of marketability) to fair value measurements. Additionally, this update
requires the disclosure of quantitative information about significant unobservable inputs, the
valuation processes in place for Level 3 measurements, the sensitivity of fair value measurements
to changes in unobservable inputs, the hierarchy classification for assets and liabilities whose
fair value is disclosed only in footnotes, any transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair
value hierarchy and the reason nonfinancial assets measured at fair value are being used in a
manner that differs from the highest and best use. This update becomes effective in periods
beginning after December 15, 2011 and is required to be adopted prospectively. Early adoption is
not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the pending adoption will have
on the Companys fair value measurements and related disclosures in its consolidated financial
statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, an update to FASB ASC
Comprehensive Income Topic, which amends the existing accounting standards related to the
presentation of comprehensive income in a companys financial
statements. This update requires that all non-owner changes in stockholders equity be
presented in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but
consecutive statements. In the two statement approach, the first statement would present total net
income and its components followed consecutively by a second statement that should present total
other comprehensive income, the components of other comprehensive income and the total of
comprehensive income. Under either presentation alternative, reclassification adjustments and the
effect of those adjustments on net income and other comprehensive
8
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
income must be presented in the
respective statement or statements, as applicable. This update becomes effective in periods
beginning after December 15, 2011 and is required to be adopted retrospectively. Early adoption is
permitted. The Company is currently evaluating which of the two presentation alternatives it will
adopt, as well as the timing of such adoption (i.e., whether to adopt prior to the required
effective date).
3. Concentration of Credit Risk
The Companys revenue is primarily generated in the United States. Changes in economic
conditions, government regulations or demographic trends, among other matters, in the United States
could adversely affect the Companys revenue and results of operations.
The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalent balances in either insured depository
accounts or money market mutual funds. The money market mutual funds are limited to investments in
low-risk securities such as United States or government agency obligations, or repurchase
agreements secured by such securities.
4. Business Combinations
2011 Acquisition
In May 2011, the Company acquired all of the equity interests of EquiClaim, LLC (EquiClaim),
a technology-enabled provider of healthcare audit and recovery solutions.
2010 Acquisitions
In January 2010, the Company acquired all of the voting interest of FutureVision Investment
Group, L.L.C. and substantially all of the assets of two related companies, FVTech, Inc. and FVTech
Arizona, Inc. (collectively, FVTech). FVTech is a provider of outsourced services specializing in
electronic data conversion and information management solutions.
In March 2010, the Company acquired Healthcare Technology Management Services, Inc. (HTMS),
a management consulting company focused primarily on the healthcare payer market.
In June 2010, the Company acquired all of the equity interests of Chapin Revenue Cycle
Management, LLC (Chapin), a technology-enabled provider of accounts receivable denial and
recovery services.
In October 2010, the Company acquired all of the equity interests of Chamberlin Edmonds
Holdings Inc. and Chamberlin Edmonds & Associates, Inc. (collectively, CEA), a technology-enabled
provider of government program eligibility and enrollment services.
9
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The following table summarizes certain information related to these acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EquiClaim |
|
|
FVTech |
|
|
HTMS |
|
|
Chapin |
|
|
CEA |
|
Total Consideration Fair Value at Acquisition Date: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid at closing |
|
$ |
39,758 |
|
|
$ |
20,005 |
|
|
$ |
7,841 |
|
|
$ |
16,096 |
|
|
$ |
209,520 |
|
Class A common stock fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,263 |
|
|
|
2,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated contingent consideration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,850 |
|
|
|
8,230 |
|
|
|
3,885 |
|
|
|
2,364 |
|
Other |
|
|
(247 |
) |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
39,511 |
|
|
$ |
34,158 |
|
|
$ |
18,743 |
|
|
$ |
22,933 |
|
|
$ |
211,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the Consideration Transferred: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
372 |
|
|
$ |
1,029 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
533 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
1,983 |
|
|
|
1,736 |
|
|
|
3,270 |
|
|
|
1,322 |
|
|
|
14,412 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
4,424 |
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
2,331 |
|
|
|
18,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,065 |
|
|
|
26,371 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
Indentifiable intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tradename (1-5 years) |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
3,570 |
|
Noncompetition agreements (5 years) |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,150 |
|
|
|
3,350 |
|
|
|
1,560 |
|
Customer relationships (9-16 years) |
|
|
13,680 |
|
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,640 |
|
|
|
77,710 |
|
Backlog (1 year) |
|
|
3,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,820 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
18,418 |
|
|
|
14,038 |
|
|
|
12,414 |
|
|
|
10,895 |
|
|
|
167,382 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(338 |
) |
|
|
(1,786 |
) |
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
(4,198 |
) |
Accrued expenses |
|
|
(807 |
) |
|
|
(550 |
) |
|
|
(1,050 |
) |
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
(13,744 |
) |
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,850 |
) |
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,300 |
) |
Deferred income tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,980 |
) |
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(832 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration transferred |
|
$ |
39,511 |
|
|
$ |
34,158 |
|
|
$ |
18,743 |
|
|
$ |
22,933 |
|
|
$ |
211,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EquiClaim |
|
|
FVTech |
|
|
HTMS |
|
|
Chapin |
|
|
CEA |
|
Other Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration Class A common stock (in shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,532 |
|
|
|
209,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross contractual accounts receivable |
|
$ |
2,094 |
|
|
$ |
1,774 |
|
|
$ |
3,286 |
|
|
$ |
1,720 |
|
|
$ |
15,873 |
|
Amount not expected to be collected |
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
398 |
|
|
$ |
1,461 |
|
Goodwill expected to be deductible for tax purposes |
|
$ |
39,483 |
|
|
$ |
18,834 |
|
|
$ |
9,339 |
|
|
$ |
18,020 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent Consideration Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent consideration range |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
0 - 40,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 - 14,000 |
|
|
Maximum of 627,080 shares of Class A common stock |
|
|
N/A |
|
Remaining performance period applicable |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
2010-2012 |
|
|
|
2011-2012 |
|
|
|
2011-2012 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Type of measurement |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Level 3 |
Key assumptions at the acquisition date: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
11.60 |
% |
|
|
20.50 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
12.60 |
% |
Expected performance |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
1,500 - 27,000 |
|
|
90% probability |
|
20% to 70%probability |
|
|
N/A |
|
Class A common stock price |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
13.28 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Marketability discount |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) to net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
960 |
|
|
$ |
2,750 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(33 |
) |
Six months ended June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
640 |
|
|
$ |
1,130 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
The valuation and allocation of the consideration transferred related to the EquiClaim and CEA
acquisitions is subject to further change based on the outcome of a working capital settlement and
the finalization and evaluation of preacquisition period tax returns, respectively.
11
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
5. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill activity during the six months ended June 30, 2011 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payer |
|
|
Provider |
|
|
Pharmacy |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
322,101 |
|
|
$ |
502,227 |
|
|
$ |
83,982 |
|
|
$ |
908,310 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
18,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,418 |
|
Changes in preliminary purchase price allocation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(564 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(564 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
340,519 |
|
|
$ |
501,663 |
|
|
$ |
83,982 |
|
|
$ |
926,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization as of June 30, 2011 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Life |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,062,113 |
|
|
$ |
(206,059 |
) |
|
$ |
856,054 |
|
Trade names |
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
121,678 |
|
|
|
(23,922 |
) |
|
|
97,756 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
19,656 |
|
|
|
(12,875 |
) |
|
|
6,781 |
|
Data sublicense agreement |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
49,600 |
|
|
|
(10,056 |
) |
|
|
39,544 |
|
Backlog |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
22,120 |
|
|
|
(15,061 |
) |
|
|
7,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,275,167 |
|
|
$ |
(267,973 |
) |
|
$ |
1,007,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense was $46,301 and $33,153 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Aggregate future amortization expense for intangible assets is estimated to be:
|
|
|
|
|
2011 (remainder) |
|
$ |
43,741 |
|
2012 |
|
|
74,462 |
|
2013 |
|
|
73,789 |
|
2014 |
|
|
73,516 |
|
2015 |
|
|
71,896 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
669,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,007,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
12
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
6. Long-Term Debt
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, long-term debt consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Credit Facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$50 million Revolving Line of Credit facility, expiring on November 16, 2012 and
bearing interest payable quarterly at a variable base rate plus a spread rate |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$755 million First Lien Term Loan facility, expiring on November 16, 2013,
bearing interest payable quarterly at a variable base rate (LIBOR) plus a
spread rate (total rate 2.19% and 2.27% ) and net of unamortized discount of $23,797
and $28,628 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively (effective interest rate of
3.92% at June 30, 2011) |
|
|
651,228 |
|
|
|
650,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$170 million Second Lien Term Loan facility, expiring on May 16, 2014, bearing
interest at a variable base rate (LIBOR) plus a spread rate (total rate 5.19%
and 5.27%) and net of unamortized discount of $10,529 and $12,136 at June 30,
2011 and December 31,2010, respectively (effective interest rate of 7.86% at
June 30, 2011) |
|
|
159,471 |
|
|
|
157,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$100 million Incremental Borrowing on First Lien Term Loan facility, expiring
on November 16, 2013, bearing interest at a variable base rate (LIBOR), subject
to a floor, plus a spread rate (total rate 4.5% for both periods) and net of
unamortized discount of $1,558 and $1,866 at June 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010, respectively
(effective interest rate of 5.44% at June 30, 2011) |
|
|
97,692 |
|
|
|
97,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligation under data sublicense agreement |
|
|
40,323 |
|
|
|
40,323 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
(12,492 |
) |
|
|
(12,494 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
936,222 |
|
|
$ |
933,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In November 2006, EBS LLC entered into two credit agreements with several lenders that
provided a $755,000 term loan (First Lien Term Loan), a $50,000 revolving line of credit
(Revolver) and a $170,000 term loan (Second Lien Term Loan). In October 2010, EBS LLC borrowed
an additional $100,000 under an incremental term loan facility (Incremental First Lien Term Loan)
through an amendment to the First Lien Term Loan.
In connection with these credit agreements, EBS LLC paid fees of approximately $19,900 to the
lenders of which the unamortized portion is classified as a reduction of the carrying value of the
credit agreements in each period. Additionally, in connection with the 2008 Transaction, 48% of the
carrying value of these credit agreements was adjusted to fair value which resulted in a discount
of $66,395, the unamortized portion of which has similarly been classified as a reduction of the
carrying value of the credit agreements.
The Revolver expires November 2012 and provides for revolving loans not to exceed $50,000, of
which $12,000 may be used for letters of credit in support of payment obligations of the Company.
As of June 30, 2011, the Company had no borrowings outstanding and $50,000 available for future
borrowings under the Revolver. The Company pays a quarterly commitment fee on the unused portion of
the Revolver that fluctuates, based upon certain leverage ratios, between 0.375% and 0.5% per
annum.
The First Lien Term Loan and Incremental First Lien Term Loan are each payable in quarterly
principal installments of approximately $1,800 and $250, respectively, plus accrued interest,
through September 2013, with a balloon payment of the remaining
13
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
principal amount outstanding due upon maturity in November 2013. These installment payments
are subject to adjustment based upon optional and mandatory prepayment activity. Mandatory
prepayments of principal related to excess cash flow, as defined, and other circumstances are also
required.
The Second Lien Term Loan is subordinate to the First Lien Term Loan and Incremental First
Lien Term Loan, and matures in May 2014.
The credit agreements require EBS LLC to maintain certain financial covenants, including a
maximum total leverage ratio and minimum interest coverage ratio. The credit agreements also impose
restrictions related to capital expenditures, investments, additional debt or liens, asset sales,
transactions with affiliates and equity interests, among other items. Additionally, the credit
agreements include restrictions on the payment of dividends or distributions (other than to fund
income tax liabilities) to or advances or loans to parties that are not party to the credit
agreements. In the case of dividends, the credit agreements generally limit payments to non-loan
parties (including the Company) with such limitations increasing based on achievement of certain
leverage ratios. Transactions with affiliates are limited to those which are approved by a majority
of the noninterested members of the EBS LLC board of directors and whose terms are no less
favorable than those available to an unrelated person. Substantially all of the Companys net
assets are subject to the restrictions of these credit agreements. EBS LLC believes it was in
compliance with all debt covenants at June 30, 2011. This debt is secured by substantially all of
the assets of EBS LLC.
Obligation Under Data Sublicense Agreement
In October 2009 and April 2010, the Company acquired certain additional rights to specified
uses of its data from WebMD in order to broaden the Companys ability to pursue business
intelligence and data analytics solutions for payers and providers. The Company previously licensed
exclusive rights to this data to WebMD pursuant to an Amended and Restated Data License Agreement
in connection with the 2008 Transaction. In connection with these data rights acquisitions, the
Company recorded amortizable intangible assets with an estimated life of approximately eight years
and corresponding obligations at inception of approximately $37,606 (net of the initial required
payment of $5,653 at contract execution) and $6,341 for the October 2009 and April 2010 data
acquisitions, respectively, based on the present value of the scheduled annual payments through
2018, which totaled $65,000 in the aggregate (of which $52,486 remains payable at June 30, 2011).
7. Interest Rate Swap
Derivative financial instruments are used to manage the Companys interest rate exposure. The
Company does not enter into financial instruments for speculative purposes. Derivative financial
instruments are accounted for in accordance with FASB ASC Derivatives and Hedging Topic and are
measured at fair value and recorded on the balance sheet. For derivative instruments that are
designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the
derivative instrument is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified
into earnings in the same line item associated with the forecasted transaction in the same period
or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings (for example, in interest expense
when the hedged transactions are interest cash flows associated with floating-rate debt). The
remaining gain or loss on the derivative instrument in excess of the cumulative change in the
present value of future cash flows of the hedged item, if any, is recognized in interest expense in
current earnings during the period of change.
The following table summarizes the fair value of the Companys derivative instrument at June
30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments |
|
|
|
Asset (Liability) Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
$ |
(5,575 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,738 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
In December 2006, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement, which matures in
December 2011, to reduce the variability of interest payments associated with its total long-term
debt. The notional amount of the swap was $239,210 and $240,720 as of June 30, 2011 and December
31, 2010, respectively. Changes in the cash flows of the interest rate swap are intended to offset
the changes in cash flows attributable to fluctuations in the variable base rates underlying the
Companys long-term debt obligations.
The 2008 Transaction represented a redesignation event. As the Companys interest rate swap
did not meet all the criteria for hedge accounting at that time, changes in the fair value
subsequent to the 2008 Transaction but prior to its redesignation as a cash flow hedge on September
30, 2008 were recorded within interest expense during the period from February 8, 2008 to September
30, 2008. In October 2010, the Company removed the designation of its interest rate swap as a cash
flow hedge such that subsequent changes in fair value are similarly recorded within interest
expense.
The amortization of the amounts reflected in other comprehensive income related to the
discontinued cash flow hedges are and continue to be reflected within interest expense in the
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. Amortization of amounts
included in other comprehensive income related to discontinued hedges is expected to total
approximately $1,925 over the next twelve months.
The effect of the derivative instrument on the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated
statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively,
is summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain related to effective portion of derivative
recognized in other
comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,264 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss related to effective portion of derivative
reclassified from
accumulated other comprehensive loss to interest expense |
|
$ |
(3,769 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,632 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,485 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,253 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain recognized in interest expense |
|
$ |
2,608 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,163 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Fair Value Measurements
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The Companys assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis
consist of the Companys derivative financial instrument and contingent consideration associated
with business combinations. The table below summarizes these items as of June 30, 2011, aggregated
by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted in |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Markets |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
Description |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
Identical (Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Interest rate swap |
|
$ |
(5,575 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5,575 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Contingent consideration obligations |
|
|
(10,995 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,995 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(16,570 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5,575 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,995 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The valuation of the Companys derivative financial instrument is determined using widely
accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows
of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivative, including the
period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves. The
fair value of the interest rate swap is determined using the market standard methodology of netting
the discounted future fixed cash payments (or receipts) and the discounted expected variable cash
receipts (or payments). The variable cash receipts (or payments) are based on an expectation of
future interest rates derived from observable market interest rate curves.
The Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own
nonperformance risk and the respective counterpartys nonperformance risk in the fair value
measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of
nonperformance risk, the Company has considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit
enhancements.
Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its
derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments
associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs to evaluate the likelihood of default by
itself and by its counterparties. As of June 30, 2011, the Company has determined that the credit
valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a result,
the Company has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level
2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The valuation of the Companys contingent consideration obligations is determined using a
probability weighted discounted cash flow method. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of
the purchase agreements and utilizes assumptions with regard to future cash flows, probabilities of
achieving such future cash flows and a discount rate.
The table below presents a reconciliation of the fair value of the liabilities that use
significant unobservable inputs (Level 3).
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
(13,529 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,260 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,046 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Issuances of contingent consideration |
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
(23,645 |
) |
Settlement of contingent consideration |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
934 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total changes included in other income |
|
|
2,235 |
|
|
|
2,060 |
|
|
|
3,638 |
|
|
|
1,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
(10,995 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,875 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,995 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,875 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value upon Initial Recognition
The carrying amount and the estimated fair value of financial instruments held by the Company
as of June 30, 2011 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
122,460 |
|
|
$ |
122,460 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
184,992 |
|
|
$ |
184,992 |
|
Long-term debt (credit facilities) |
|
$ |
908,391 |
|
|
$ |
942,013 |
|
Cost method investment |
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,016 |
|
The carrying amounts of cash equivalents and accounts receivable approximate fair value
because of their short-term maturities. The fair value of long-term debt is based upon market
trades by investors in partial interests of these instruments. The fair value of the cost method
investment is estimated using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model.
16
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
9. Legal Proceedings
On or about August 5, 2011, plaintiff Harold Litwin filed a putative class action in Delaware Chancery Court
against the Company, its directors, Blackstone Capital Partners VI L.P., H&F and GA seeking to preliminarily
enjoin the proposed merger of the Company and an entity formed by Blackstone Capital Partners VI L.P to acquire
the Company. Plaintiff alleged that the Companys directors breached their fiduciary duties in connection with the
proposed transaction, and the Company allegedly aided and abetted those breaches. No amount of damages is stated
in the complaint. The Company believes the allegations are without merit.
In
addition, in the normal course of business, the Company is involved in various claims and legal
proceedings. While the ultimate resolution of these matters has yet to be determined, the Company
does not believe that their outcomes will have a material adverse effect on the Companys
consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
10. Capital Stock
Common Stock
Under the Companys amended and restated certificate of incorporation, the Company is
authorized to issue 400,000,000 shares of Class A common stock and 52,000,000 shares of Class B
common stock, each with a par value of $0.00001 per share. The Class A common stock and Class B
common stock each provide holders with one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders;
however, the holders of Class B common stock do not have any of the economic rights (including
rights to dividends and distributions upon liquidation) provided to the holders of the Class A
common stock. Shares of Class B common stock, together with corresponding EBS Master Units, may be
exchanged with the Company for shares of Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis, subject to
customary conversion rate adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends and reclassifications. All
shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock generally vote together, as a single class,
on all matters submitted to a vote of the Companys stockholders.
Preferred Stock
Under the Companys amended and restated certificate of incorporation, the Company is
authorized to issue 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock, with a par value of $0.00001 per share.
Noncontrolling Interests
The Company has executed transactions that both increased and decreased its ownership interest
in EBS Master. These changes are summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net income attributable to Emdeon Inc. |
|
$ |
10,194 |
|
|
$ |
6,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers from the noncontrolling interest: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in Emdeon Inc. paid-in capital for the issuance of EBS Master Units in
connection
with acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,279 |
|
Increase in Emdeon Inc. paid-in capital for issuance of EBS Master Units in connection
with equity compensation plans |
|
|
1,590 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
Increase in Emdeon Inc. paid-in capital for exchange of EBS Master Units to Class A
common stock of Emdeon Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
425 |
|
Increase in Emdeon Inc. paid-in capital for cancellation of EBS Master Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net transfers from noncontrolling interest |
|
|
1,590 |
|
|
|
4,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change from net income attributable to Emdeon Inc. and transfers from noncontrolling interest |
|
$ |
11,784 |
|
|
$ |
11,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
11. Equity-Based Compensation Plans
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company issued 333,515 restricted Class A
common stock units and 1,486,800 options to purchase Class A common stock under the Companys 2009
Equity Incentive Plan, with an aggregate grant date fair value of $15,017. These restricted Class
A common stock units and options to purchase Class A common stock generally vest ratably over a
four-year period.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recognized equity-based
compensation expense of $11,483 and $7,847, respectively.
12. Income Taxes
Income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 amounted to an expense of $13,095
and $20,152, respectively. The Companys effective tax rate was 44.2% for the six months ended June
30, 2011 compared with 63.6% during the same period in 2010. The Companys effective tax rate is
affected by deferred tax expense resulting from differences between the book and income tax basis
of its investment in EBS Master, noncontrolling interest, changes in the Companys valuation
allowances and other factors. Changes in valuation allowances resulted in $1,413 and $5,762 of
additional income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending liability for uncertain tax positions is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized benefit January 1, 2011 |
|
$ |
1,368 |
|
Decrease in six months ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized benefit June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
1,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company decreased its liability for uncertain tax positions during the six months ended
June 30, 2011 following the lapse of the statute of limitations on an open year. The
Company does not currently anticipate that the total amount of uncertain tax positions will
significantly increase or decrease in the next twelve months.
The Company recognizes interest income and expense (if any) related to income taxes as a
component of income tax expense. Interest of $42 has been included in the tax provision for the
six months ended June 30, 2011.
The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and
various states and foreign jurisdictions. The Companys U.S. federal and state income tax returns
for the tax years 2007 and beyond remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
With respect to state and local jurisdictions and countries outside of the United States, the
Company and its subsidiaries are typically subject to examination for a number of years after the
income tax returns have been filed. Although the outcome of tax audits is always uncertain, the
Company believes that adequate amounts of tax, interest and penalties have been provided for in the
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for any adjustments that may be
incurred due to state, local or foreign audits.
18
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
13. Tax Receivable Agreement Obligation to Related Parties
In connection with the IPO, the Company entered into tax receivable agreements which obligate
the Company to make payments to certain entities affiliated with General Atlantic and H&F and
certain senior management team members and directors who held profits interests in EBS Master,
called Grant Units, prior to the IPO (Former EBS Master Grant Unit Holders) generally equal to
85% of the applicable cash savings that the Company realizes as a result of tax attributes arising
from the 2006 Transaction, the 2008 Transaction and the exchange of EBS Master Units (along with
corresponding shares of Class B common stock) for cash or shares of Class A common stock. The
Company will retain the benefit of the remaining 15% of these tax savings.
All future exchanges of EBS Master Units for cash or shares of Class A common stock related to
the affiliates of General Atlantic, H&F and the Former EBS Master Grant Unit Holders who are
parties to the tax receivable agreements are expected to result in an additional tax receivable
obligation for the Company, with a corresponding offset to the Companys additional paid in capital
account. Subsequent adjustments of the tax receivable obligations due to certain events (e.g.,
realization of net operating losses, tax rate changes or the timing of cash settlement obligations)
are expected to result in a corresponding adjustment of the Companys net income. The Company
recognized changes in estimate related to this obligation of approximately $226 (decrease to pretax
income) for the six months ended June 30, 2011.
The timing and/or amount of aggregate payments due may vary based on a number of factors,
including the amount and timing of the taxable income the Company generates in the future and the
tax rate then applicable, the use of loss carryovers and the portion of the payments under the tax
receivable agreements constituting imputed interest or amortizable basis.
19
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
14. Net Income Per Share
The following tables sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per
share of Class A common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Basic net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Emdeon Inc. |
|
$ |
5,801 |
|
|
$ |
4,229 |
|
|
$ |
10,194 |
|
|
$ |
6,118 |
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
91,057,293 |
|
|
|
90,061,975 |
|
|
|
91,022,516 |
|
|
|
89,879,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss excluding EBS Master |
|
$ |
(6,853 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,774 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,088 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,503 |
) |
Weighted average effect of dilutive securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emdeon Inc. allocation of EBS Master net
income |
|
|
12,690 |
|
|
|
11,005 |
|
|
|
23,357 |
|
|
|
19,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,837 |
|
|
$ |
4,231 |
|
|
$ |
10,269 |
|
|
$ |
6,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares used in basic computation |
|
|
91,057,293 |
|
|
|
90,061,975 |
|
|
|
91,022,516 |
|
|
|
89,879,916 |
|
Weighted average effect of dilutive securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange of Class B common stock for Class A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Class A common stock units |
|
|
166,380 |
|
|
|
103,360 |
|
|
|
161,691 |
|
|
|
89,046 |
|
Contingently issuable Class A common stock |
|
|
117,636 |
|
|
|
593,695 |
|
|
|
109,907 |
|
|
|
679,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,341,309 |
|
|
|
90,759,030 |
|
|
|
91,294,114 |
|
|
|
90,648,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to their antidilutive effect, the following securities have been excluded from diluted net income per share for the respective periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B common stock |
|
|
23,891,602 |
|
|
|
23,418,371 |
|
|
|
23,878,906 |
|
|
|
23,408,255 |
|
Options to purchase Class A common stock |
|
|
7,571,933 |
|
|
|
5,844,226 |
|
|
|
7,123,096 |
|
|
|
5,371,146 |
|
Restricted Class A common stock units |
|
|
411,809 |
|
|
|
474,745 |
|
|
|
351,937 |
|
|
|
399,035 |
|
Additionally, 376,248 contingently issuable shares of Class A common stock have been excluded from diluted net income per share for the three and six
month periods ending June 30, 2011 because the contingencies have not been resolved.
20
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
15. Segment Reporting
Management views the Companys operating results in three reportable segments: (a) payer
services, (b) provider services and (c) pharmacy services. Listed below are the results of
operations for each of the reportable segments. This information is reflected in the manner
utilized by management to make operating decisions, assess performance and allocate resources.
Segment assets are not presented to management for purposes of operational decision making, and
therefore are not included in the accompanying tables. The accounting policies of the reportable
segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies in the
notes to the Companys audited consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Payer Services Segment
The payer services segment provides payment cycle solutions to healthcare payers, both
directly and through the Companys channel partners, that simplify the administration of healthcare
related to insurance eligibility and benefit verification, claims filing, payment integrity and
claims and payment distribution. Additionally, the payer services segment provides consulting
services primarily to healthcare payers.
Provider Services Segment
The provider services segment provides revenue cycle management solutions, patient billing and
payment services, government program eligibility and enrollment services and clinical exchange
capabilities, both directly and through the Companys channel partners, that simplify providers
revenue cycle and workflow, reduce related costs and improve cash flow.
Pharmacy Services Segment
The pharmacy services segment provides electronic prescribing services and other electronic
solutions to pharmacies, pharmacy benefit management companies and government agencies related to
prescription benefit claim filing, adjudication and management.
Other
Inter-segment revenue and expenses primarily represent claims management and patient statement
services provided between segments.
Corporate and eliminations includes personnel and other costs associated with the Companys
management, administrative and other corporate services functions and eliminations to remove
inter-segment revenues and expenses.
21
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The revenue and total segment contribution for the reportable segments are as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payer |
|
|
Provider |
|
|
Pharmacy |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue from external customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims management |
|
$ |
52,972 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
52,972 |
|
Payment services |
|
|
62,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,507 |
|
Patient statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,022 |
|
Revenue cycle management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,945 |
|
Dental |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,871 |
|
Pharmacy services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,793 |
|
Inter-segment revenues |
|
|
864 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(988 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
|
116,343 |
|
|
|
145,962 |
|
|
|
20,793 |
|
|
|
(988 |
) |
|
|
282,110 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
77,545 |
|
|
|
89,268 |
|
|
|
8,872 |
|
|
|
(928 |
) |
|
|
174,757 |
|
Development and engineering |
|
|
2,869 |
|
|
|
4,713 |
|
|
|
1,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,358 |
|
Sales, marketing, general
and administrative |
|
|
7,058 |
|
|
|
9,439 |
|
|
|
1,287 |
|
|
|
13,714 |
|
|
|
31,498 |
|
|
|
|
Segment contribution |
|
$ |
28,871 |
|
|
$ |
42,542 |
|
|
$ |
8,858 |
|
|
$ |
(13,774 |
) |
|
|
66,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,934 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,653 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,235 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payer |
|
|
Provider |
|
|
Pharmacy |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue from external customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims management |
|
$ |
49,695 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
49,695 |
|
Payment services |
|
|
56,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,504 |
|
Patient statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,705 |
|
Revenue cycle management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,511 |
|
Dental |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,947 |
|
Pharmacy services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,927 |
|
Inter-segment revenue |
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(752 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
|
106,879 |
|
|
|
117,235 |
|
|
|
19,927 |
|
|
|
(752 |
) |
|
|
243,289 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
69,947 |
|
|
|
71,963 |
|
|
|
7,254 |
|
|
|
(720 |
) |
|
|
148,444 |
|
Development and engineering |
|
|
2,992 |
|
|
|
3,898 |
|
|
|
1,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,695 |
|
Sales, marketing, general
and administrative |
|
|
6,206 |
|
|
|
6,810 |
|
|
|
1,503 |
|
|
|
11,724 |
|
|
|
26,243 |
|
|
|
|
Segment contribution |
|
$ |
27,734 |
|
|
$ |
34,564 |
|
|
$ |
9,365 |
|
|
$ |
(11,756 |
) |
|
|
59,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,278 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,919 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,060 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payer |
|
|
Provider |
|
|
Pharmacy |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue from external customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims management |
|
$ |
100,526 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
100,526 |
|
Payment services |
|
|
124,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,742 |
|
Patient statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,539 |
|
Revenue cycle management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,799 |
|
Dental |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,604 |
|
Pharmacy services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,398 |
|
Inter-segment revenues |
|
|
1,720 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,960 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
|
226,988 |
|
|
|
287,182 |
|
|
|
41,398 |
|
|
|
(1,960 |
) |
|
|
553,608 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
152,872 |
|
|
|
175,439 |
|
|
|
17,535 |
|
|
|
(1,835 |
) |
|
|
344,011 |
|
Development and engineering |
|
|
5,727 |
|
|
|
9,032 |
|
|
|
3,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,260 |
|
Sales, marketing, general
and administrative |
|
|
13,871 |
|
|
|
19,955 |
|
|
|
2,589 |
|
|
|
26,730 |
|
|
|
63,145 |
|
|
|
|
Segment contribution |
|
$ |
54,518 |
|
|
$ |
82,756 |
|
|
$ |
17,773 |
|
|
$ |
(26,855 |
) |
|
|
128,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,956 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,282 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,638 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payer |
|
|
Provider |
|
|
Pharmacy |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue from external customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims management |
|
$ |
94,843 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
94,843 |
|
Payment services |
|
|
113,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,324 |
|
Patient statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,294 |
|
Revenue cycle management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,600 |
|
Dental |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,884 |
|
Pharmacy services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,623 |
|
Inter-segment revenue |
|
|
1,554 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,712 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
|
209,721 |
|
|
|
232,936 |
|
|
|
39,623 |
|
|
|
(1,712 |
) |
|
|
480,568 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
136,578 |
|
|
|
143,521 |
|
|
|
13,979 |
|
|
|
(1,648 |
) |
|
|
292,430 |
|
Development and engineering |
|
|
5,966 |
|
|
|
7,762 |
|
|
|
3,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,248 |
|
Sales, marketing, general and
administrative |
|
|
13,166 |
|
|
|
13,700 |
|
|
|
3,061 |
|
|
|
22,435 |
|
|
|
52,362 |
|
|
|
|
Segment contribution |
|
$ |
54,011 |
|
|
$ |
67,953 |
|
|
$ |
19,063 |
|
|
$ |
(22,499 |
) |
|
|
118,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,053 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,584 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,770 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Emdeon Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited and amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
16. Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
The following is a summary of the accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income balances, net of
taxes and noncontrolling interest, as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Currency |
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Translation |
|
|
Cash Flow |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Adjustment |
|
|
Hedge |
|
|
(Loss) Income |
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2011 |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
(2,603 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,569 |
) |
Change associated with foreign currency translation |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Reclassification into earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,293 |
|
|
|
1,293 |
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
(1,310 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,280 |
) |
|
|
|
17. Subsequent Events
On
August 3, 2011, the Company entered into a definitive merger agreement with Blackstone
Capital Partners VI L.P. under which this Blackstone fund will acquire a controlling interest in
the Company in a transaction valued at approximately $3 billion. H&F will maintain
a significant noncontrolling equity interest in the Company. Under the terms of the merger agreement,
holders of the Companys common stock will receive $19.00 per share in cash.
The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions, including approval by the
Companys stockholders and clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act, and is currently expected to
be completed in the second half of 2011. Following completion of the
proposed transaction, the Company will
become a privately held company and its Class A common stock will no longer be traded on the New
York Stock Exchange.
24
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes in Part I, Item 1 of this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Quarterly Report), together with the risk factors contained in the
section titled Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010 (Form 10-K) on file with the Securities & Exchange Commission (the SEC). Unless stated
otherwise or the context otherwise requires, references in this Quarterly Report to we, us,
our, Emdeon and the Company refer to Emdeon Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking
statements because they are subject to numerous uncertainties and factors relating to our
operations and business environment, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are
beyond our control. Forward-looking statements include information concerning our possible or
assumed future results of operations, including descriptions of our business strategy. These
statements often include words such as may, will, should, believe, expect, anticipate,
intend, plan, estimate or similar expressions. These statements are based upon assumptions
that we have made in light of our experience in the industry, as well as our perceptions of
historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors we believe
are appropriate under the circumstances. As you read this Quarterly Report, you should understand
that these statements are not guarantees of performance or results. They involve known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Although we believe that these forward-looking statements are
based upon reasonable assumptions, you should be aware that many factors could affect our actual
financial results or results of operations and could cause actual results to differ materially from
those in the forward-looking statements. For further information about these and other factors that
could affect our future results, please see the risk factors contained in the section titled Risk
Factors in our Form 10-K and in Part II, Item 1A of this
Quarterly Report.
Our forward looking statements made herein speak only as of the date on which made. We
expressly disclaim any intent, obligation or undertaking to update or revise any forward-looking
statements made herein to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or any change
in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statements are based. All subsequent
written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are
expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained in this Quarterly
Report.
Overview
We are a leading provider of revenue and payment cycle management and clinical information
exchange solutions connecting payers, providers and patients in the U.S. healthcare system. Our
solutions integrate and automate key business and administrative functions of our payer and
provider customers throughout the patient encounter, including pre-care patient eligibility and
benefits verification and enrollment, clinical information exchange capabilities, claims management
and adjudication, payment integrity, payment distribution, payment posting and denial management
and patient billing and payment processing. Our customers are able to improve efficiency, reduce
costs, increase cash flow and more efficiently manage the complex revenue and payment cycle and
clinical information exchange processes by using our comprehensive suite of solutions.
We deliver our solutions and operate our business in three business segments: (i) payer
services, which provides solutions to commercial insurance companies, third party administrators
and governmental payers; (ii) provider services, which provides solutions to hospitals, physicians,
dentists and other healthcare providers, such as labs and home healthcare providers; and (iii)
pharmacy services, which provides solutions to pharmacies, pharmacy benefit management companies,
government agencies and other payers. Through our payer services segment, we provide payment cycle
solutions, both directly and through our network of channel partners that help simplify the
administration of healthcare related to insurance eligibility and benefit verification, claims
filing, payment integrity and claims and payment distribution. Additionally, we provide consulting
services through our payer services segment. Through our provider services segment, we provide
revenue cycle management solutions, patient billing and payment services, government program
eligibility and enrollment services and clinical information exchange capabilities, both directly
and through our channel partners, that simplify providers revenue cycle and workflow, reduce
related costs and improve cash flow. Through our
25
pharmacy services segment, we provide electronic
prescribing and other electronic solutions to pharmacies, pharmacy benefit management companies and
government agencies related to prescription benefit claim filing, adjudication and management.
There are a number of company-specific initiatives and industry trends that may affect our
transaction volumes, revenues, cost of operations and margins. As part of our strategy, we
encourage our customers to migrate from paper-based claim, patient statement, payment and other
transaction processing to electronic, automated processing in order to improve efficiency. Our
business is aligned with our customers to support this transition, and as they migrate from
paper-based transaction processing to electronic processing, even though our revenues for an
applicable customer generally will decline, our margins and profitability will typically increase.
For example, because the cost of postage is included in our revenues for patient statement and
payment services (which is then also deducted as a cost of operations), when our customers
transition to electronic processing, our revenues and costs of operations are expected to decrease
as we will no longer incur or be required to charge for postage. As another example, as our payer
customers migrate to exclusive or other comprehensive management services agreements with us, our
electronic transaction volume usually increases while the rebates we pay and the per transaction
rates we charge under these agreements are typically reduced.
Part of our strategy also includes the development and introduction of new solutions. Our new
and updated solutions are likely to require us to incur development and engineering expenditures at
levels similar to, and possibly greater than, recent years expenditures in order to successfully
develop and achieve market acceptance of such solutions. We also may acquire, or enter into
agreements with third parties to assist us in providing, new solutions. For example, we offer our
electronic payment solutions through banks or vendors who contract with banks and other financial
service firms. The costs of these initiatives or the failure to achieve broad penetration in target
markets with respect to new or updated solutions may negatively affect our results of operations
and margins. Because newly introduced solutions generally will have lower margins initially as
compared to our existing and more mature solutions, our margins may be adversely affected on a
percentage basis until these new solutions achieve scale and maturity. Though the revenue and
expenditures from these newly introduced solutions was not significant enough to have a material
effect on our margins in 2010, if the revenue or expenditures from these or future new solutions
increase significantly during 2011 or future years, our margin growth could be negatively impacted
until such time as these new solutions reach scale and maturity.
In addition to our internal development efforts, we actively evaluate opportunities to improve
and expand our solutions through strategic acquisitions. Our acquisition strategy focuses on
identifying acquisitions that improve and streamline the business and administrative functions of
healthcare. We believe our broad customer footprint allows us to deploy acquired solutions into our
installed base, which, in turn, can help to accelerate growth of our acquired businesses. We also
believe our management teams ability to identify acquisition opportunities that are complementary
and synergistic to our business, and to integrate them into our existing operations with minimal
disruption, will continue to play an important role in the expansion of our business and in our
growth. Our success in acquiring and integrating acquired businesses into our existing operations,
the associated costs of such acquisitions, including integration costs, and the operating
characteristics of the acquired businesses also may impact our results of operations and margins.
Because the businesses we have acquired recently generally have lower margins than
our existing businesses, primarily as a result of their lack of scale and maturity, our margins on a
percentage basis may be adversely affected in the periods subsequent to an acquisition from revenue
mix changes and integration activities associated with these acquisitions. For example, the
acquisitions we completed during 2010 negatively impacted our percentage margin growth during 2010.
We currently expect a similar, and possibly greater, impact during 2011 as the revenues from these
2010 acquisitions increase relative to our overall revenues.
We also expect to continue to be affected by general economic, regulatory and demographic
factors affecting the healthcare industry. For several years, there has been pricing pressure in
our industry, which has led and is expected to continue to lead to reduced prices for the same
services. We have sought in the past and will continue to seek to mitigate pricing pressure by (i)
providing additional value-added solutions, (ii) increasing the
volume of solutions we provide and
(iii) managing our costs. In addition, significant changes in regulatory schemes, such as the
updated Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Version 5010 standard
electronic transaction code set requirements for ICD-10 (HIPAA Version 5010), American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of
2009, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and other federal healthcare policy initiatives,
could impact our customers healthcare activities. For example, because HIPAA Version 5010
becomes mandatory on January 1, 2012, we expect to incur increased
operating costs and capital expenditures related to compliance with HIPAA Version 5010 testing and
conversion efforts throughout 2011.
26
Demographic trends affecting the healthcare industry, such as population growth and aging or
continued high unemployment rates as a result of recent adverse economic conditions, also could
affect the frequency and nature of our customers healthcare transactional activity. The impact of
such changes could impact our revenues, cost of operations and infrastructure expenses and thereby
affect our results of operations and the way we operate our business. For example, an increase in
the U.S. population, if such increase is accompanied by an increase in the U.S. population that has
health benefits, or the aging of the U.S. population, which requires an overall increased need for
healthcare services, may result in an increase in our transaction volumes which, in turn, may
increase our
revenues and cost of operations. Alternatively, a continuation of
the recent general economic downturn, which reduces the
number of discretionary health procedures by patients, or a persistent high unemployment rate, if
such unemployment rate is accompanied by a decrease in the U.S. population that has health
benefits, may lessen healthcare utilization which may decrease or offset other growth in our
transaction volumes, which, in turn, may adversely impact our revenues and cost of operations. For
example, for the year ended December 31, 2010 and the six months ended June 30, 2011, revenues for
each of our payer services, provider services and pharmacy services segments were adversely
affected by the impact of lower healthcare utilization trends driven by continued high unemployment
and other economic factors.
Organizational Structure
The Company is a Delaware corporation. A brief history of our organizational structure is as
follows:
|
|
|
Prior to November 2006, the group of companies that comprised Emdeon Business Services
(EBS) was owned by HLTH Corporation, currently known as WebMD Health Corp. (WebMD). EBS
Master LLC (EBS Master) was formed by WebMD to act as a holding company for EBS. EBS
Master, through its 100% owned subsidiary, Emdeon Business Services LLC (EBS LLC), owns
EBS. |
|
|
|
|
In September 2006, we were formed by General Atlantic LLC (General Atlantic) as a
Delaware limited liability company for the purpose of making an investment in EBS Master. In
November 2006, we acquired a 52% interest in EBS Master from WebMD (the 2006 Transaction). |
|
|
|
|
In February 2008, WebMD sold its remaining 48% interest in EBS Master (the 2008
Transaction) to affiliates of General Atlantic and Hellman & Friedman LLC (H&F). As a
result, following the 2008 Transaction, EBS Master was owned 65.77% by affiliates of General
Atlantic (including us) and 34.23% by affiliates of H&F. General Atlantic and H&F are
sometimes referred to herein as the Principal Equityholders. |
|
|
|
|
In connection with our August 2009 initial public offering (IPO), we were converted
into a Delaware corporation, changed our name to Emdeon Inc. and completed a corporate
restructuring. |
Recent Developments
In May 2011, the Company acquired all of the equity interests of EquiClaim, LLC (EquiClaim),
a technology-enabled provider of healthcare audit and recovery solutions, and entered into certain
other related agreements with MultiPlan, Inc., the parent of EquiClaim, for approximately $41.0
million in cash.
On
August 3, 2011, the Company entered into a definitive merger agreement with Blackstone
Capital Partners VI L.P. under which this Blackstone fund will acquire a controlling interest in
the Company in a transaction valued at approximately $3 billion.
H&F will maintain
a significant noncontrolling equity interest in the Company. Under the terms of the merger agreement,
holders of the Companys common stock will receive $19.00 per share in cash. The transaction is
subject to customary closing conditions, including approval by the Companys stockholders and
clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act, and is currently expected to be completed in the second
half of 2011. Following completion of the proposed transaction, the Company will become a privately held
company and its Class A common stock will no longer be traded on the New York Stock Exchange.
27
Our Revenues and Expenses
We generate virtually all of our revenue by using technology solutions to provide services to
our customers that automate and simplify business and administrative functions for payers,
providers and pharmacies, generally on either a per transaction, per document, per communication or
per member per month basis, or, in some cases, on a monthly flat-fee, contingent fee or hourly
basis.
Cost of operations consists primarily of costs related to services we provide to customers and
costs associated with the operation and maintenance of our networks. These costs include (i)
postage and materials costs related to our patient statements and payment services, (ii) rebates
paid to our channel partners and (iii) data communications costs, all of which generally vary with
our revenues and/or volumes. Cost of operations also includes (i) personnel costs associated with
production, network operations, customer support and other personnel, (ii) facilities expenses and
(iii) equipment maintenance, all of which vary less directly with our revenue and/or volumes due to
the fixed or semi-fixed nature of these expenses.
The largest component of our cost of operations is currently postage which is incurred in our
patient statements and payment services and which is also a component of our revenue in those
businesses. Our postage costs increase as our patient statements and payment services volumes
increase and also when the U.S. Postal Service increases postage rates. U.S. postage rate
increases, while generally billed as pass-through costs to our customers, affect our cost of
operations as a percentage of revenue. In prior years, we have offset the impact of postage rate
increases through cost reductions from efficiency measures, including data communication expense
reductions and production efficiencies. Though we plan to continue our efficiency measures, we may
not be able to offset the impact of postage rate increases in the future and, as a result, cost of
operations as a percentage of revenue may rise if postage rate increases continue. Although the
U.S. Postal Service increased postage rates annually from 2006 to 2009, annual increases may not
occur as regularly in the future. For example, no postage rate increase occurred in 2010, and
increases for 2011 were limited to only certain categories of mailings.
Rebates are paid to channel partners for electronic and other volumes delivered through our
network to certain payers and can be impacted by the number of exclusive or other comprehensive
management services agreements we execute with payers, the associated rate structure with our payer
customers, the success of our direct sales efforts for provider revenue cycle management solutions
and the extent to which direct connections to payers are developed by channel partners.
Our data communication expense consists of telecommunication and transaction processing
charges. Over the last several years, we have been able to reduce our data communication expense
due to efficiency measures and contract pricing changes. Due to the significance of these past
reductions in recent years, further reductions may have a lesser impact in future periods.
Our material costs relate primarily to our patient statements and payment services volumes,
and consist primarily of paper and printing costs.
Development and engineering expense consists primarily of personnel costs related to the
development, management and maintenance of our current and future solutions. We plan to invest more
in this area in the future as we develop new and enhance existing solutions.
Sales, marketing, general and administrative expense (excluding corporate expense described in
the next paragraph) consists primarily of personnel costs associated with our sales, account
management and marketing functions and management and administrative services related to the
operations of our business segments.
Our corporate expense relates to personnel and other costs associated with management,
administrative, finance, human resources, legal, marketing, public and investor relations,
compliance and other corporate service functions, as well as professional services, costs incurred
in connection with acquisitions, certain facilities costs, insurance, regulatory compliance and
other expenses related to our overall business operations.
Our development and engineering expense, sales, marketing, general and administrative expense
and our corporate expense, while related to our current operations, are also affected and
influenced by our future plans including the development of new solutions, business strategies and
enhancement and maintenance of our infrastructure.
Our depreciation and amortization expense is related to depreciation of our property and
equipment, including technology assets and amortization of intangible assets acquired and recorded
in conjunction with acquisition method accounting. During 2010, we
28
made increased investments in
property and equipment primarily related to our new data center, print equipment upgrades in our
patient statements facility, product development, efficiency measures and system upgrades related
to regulatory requirements, such as HIPAA Version 5010. In addition, our increased acquisition
activity in 2010 resulted in an increase in acquired technology and intangible assets, as well as
increased capital expenditure requirements due to the inclusion of development and engineering
infrastructures of the acquired businesses. As a result of these investments, we expect our
depreciation and amortization expense to increase in 2011 and future years.
Our interest expense consists principally of cash interest associated with our long-term debt
obligations and our interest rate swap agreement. Interest expense also includes non-cash interest
associated with the amortization of the debt discount recorded in connection with the 2008
Transaction, borrowing costs and discounts related to debt issuance, amortization of our
discontinued cash flow hedges and changes in the fair value of our interest rate swap agreement
during periods when the interest rate swap agreement has not been subject to hedge accounting. Due
to the unusually low interest rates on the variable portion of our long-term debt during the past
few years, our interest expense has been less than otherwise would have been expected. If market
interest rates on the variable portion of our long-term debt increase in the future, our interest
expense would increase. The amount of our interest expense also could increase if and when we
refinance our current long-term debt obligations.
Our income taxes consist of federal and state income taxes. These amounts include current
income taxes payable as well as income taxes for which the payment is deferred to future periods
and dependent on the occurrence of future events. Our income tax expense may vary from the expense
that would be expected based on statutory rates due principally to our organizational structure and
differences in the book and tax basis of our investment in EBS Master. The recognition of valuation
allowances related to certain net operating loss carryovers can also affect our income tax expense.
For additional information see the discussion of income taxes in the section Significant Items
Affecting Comparability-Income Taxes.
Significant Items Affecting Comparability
Certain significant items or events should be considered to better understand differences in
our results of operations from period to period. We believe that the following items or events have
had a significant impact on our results of operations for the periods discussed below or may have a
significant impact on our results of operations in future periods:
Acquisitions and Divestitures
We actively evaluate opportunities to improve and expand our business through targeted
acquisitions that are consistent with our strategy. On occasion, we also may dispose of certain
components of our business that no longer fit within our overall strategy. Because of our
acquisition and divestiture activity, our results of operations may not be directly comparable
among periods. The following summarizes our acquisition transactions since January 1, 2010 and
affected segments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date |
|
Business |
|
Description |
|
Affected Segment |
January 2010
|
|
Future Vision
Investment Group,
L.L.C. (FVTech)
|
|
Electronic data
conversion and
management
solutions
|
|
Provider; Payer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 2010
|
|
Healthcare
Technology
Management
Services, Inc.
(HTMS)
|
|
Consulting solutions
|
|
Payer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2010
|
|
Data Rights
|
|
Acquired certain
additional rights
to specified uses
of data from WebMD
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 2010
|
|
Chapin Revenue
Cycle Management,
LLC (Chapin)
|
|
Accounts receivable
denial and recovery
services
|
|
Provider |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2010
|
|
Chamberlin Edmonds
& Associates, Inc.
(CEA)
|
|
Government program
eligibility and
enrollment services
|
|
Provider |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2011
|
|
EquiClaim
|
|
Technology-enabled
provider of
healthcare audit
and recovery
solutions
|
|
Payer |
29
For certain of our 2010 acquisitions, we agreed to transfer additional consideration to the
sellers of the acquired businesses in the event that specified performance measures are achieved.
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles require us to recognize the initial fair value of the
expected amount to be paid under such contingent consideration arrangements as a component of the
total consideration transferred. Subsequent changes in the fair value of the amounts expected to be
paid, however, are generally required to be recognized as a component of net income. Such changes
in fair value may occur based on changes in the expected timing or amount of payments or the effect
of discounting the liability for the time value of money. During the three and six months ended
June
30, 2011, we recognized a net increase in pretax income of $2.2 million and $3.6 million,
respectively, related to changes in fair value of contingent consideration related to acquisitions.
Efficiency Measures
We evaluate and implement efficiency measures and other cost savings initiatives on an ongoing
basis to improve our financial and operating performance through reorganization, cost savings,
productivity improvements and other process improvements. For instance, we are consolidating our
data centers, consolidating our networks and outsourcing certain information technology and
operations functions. The implementation of these measures often involve upfront costs related to
severance, professional fees, contractor costs and/or capital expenditures, with the cost savings
or other improvements not realized until the measures are successfully completed.
Income Taxes
Our statutory federal and state income tax rate ranges from 38% to 40%. Our effective income
tax rate, however, is affected by several factors. The following table and subsequent commentary
reconciles our federal statutory rate to our effective income tax rate and the subsequent
commentary describes the more significant of the reconciling factors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Statutory U.S. federal tax rate |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
State income taxes (net of federal benefit) |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
Meals and entertainment |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Other |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
Tax credits |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Equity-based compensation |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Non-timing basis differences |
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
Change in valuation allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate |
|
|
44.2 |
% |
|
|
63.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity-based compensation Prior to the IPO, certain members of our senior management team
and board of directors held profits interests in EBS Master which had only a nominal, if any, value
at the date they were originally granted. Because of this nominal value, each of the profits
interest holders had made an election to pay income taxes based on the fair value of the profits
interest on the grant date. As a result, while the Company continues to recognize compensation
expense related to these awards as they vest, the Company receives no tax deduction related to
these awards.
Non-timing basis differences Due to our organizational structure, certain items, including a
portion of our equity-based compensation, other comprehensive income and income of corporate
consolidated subsidiaries of EBS Master, affect our book basis in EBS Master without similarly
affecting our tax basis in EBS Master. In the case of our corporate consolidated subsidiaries, the
Company recognizes income tax expense both at the subsidiary and the parent company level for the
same income (once as it is earned at the subsidiary level and once as a result of the tax effect of
the difference in tax and book basis of the limited liability company which controls those
corporate subsidiaries). As a result, our effective income tax rates may be impacted by these
matters.
Noncontrolling interest We conduct substantially all of our operations through the direct
and indirect subsidiaries of EBS Master, a portion of the interests of which are held by entities
controlled by the Principal Equityholders. Accordingly, we recognize income tax expense only for
the portion of the income generated by EBS Master that is attributable to us.
30
Change in valuation allowance We record valuation allowances or reverse existing valuation
allowances related to assumed future income tax benefits depending on circumstances and factors
related to our business. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we recognized a capital loss
for tax purposes. Because we do not anticipate being able to recognize the benefit of this capital
loss in the foreseeable future, we increased our valuation allowance by approximately $2.9 million
related to this matter. Additionally, we increased our valuation allowance in the six months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010 related to state net operating losses by approximately $1.4 million and $2.9
million, respectively, as a result of incremental losses of a corporate consolidated subsidiary.
Interest Rate Swap
In order to manage our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, we maintain an interest
rate swap agreement which has the effect of converting a portion of our obligations under our
credit agreements to a fixed rate of interest. Beginning in September 2008, we
designated this interest rate swap agreement as a hedge of variability in our cash flows such
that changes in the value of this instrument were reflected within accumulated comprehensive
income. Effective October 1, 2010, we removed the hedge designation for this interest rate swap to
take advantage of lower variable interest rates under our credit agreements such that changes in
the fair value of this swap agreement are once again reflected within interest expense for all
periods following October 1, 2010. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, interest
expense was reduced by $2.6 million and $5.2 million, respectively, due to changes in the fair
value of this interest rate swap agreement.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and related
disclosures. We consider an accounting estimate to be critical if:
|
|
|
it requires assumptions to be made that were uncertain at the time the estimate was
made; and |
|
|
|
|
changes in the estimate or different estimates that could have been made could have a
material impact on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition. |
We believe the current assumptions and other considerations used to estimate amounts reflected
in our consolidated financial statements are appropriate. However, if actual experience differs
from the assumptions and other considerations used in estimating amounts reflected in our
consolidated financial statements, the resulting changes could have a material adverse effect on
our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
We believe there have been no significant changes during the six months ended June 30, 2011 to
the items we disclosed as our critical accounting estimates in Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Form 10-K.
31
Results of Operations
The following table summarizes our consolidated results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Revenue(1) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Revenue(1) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Revenue(1) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Revenue(1) |
|
Revenues (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payer Services |
|
$ |
116,343 |
|
|
|
41.2 |
% |
|
$ |
106,879 |
|
|
|
43.9 |
% |
|
$ |
226,988 |
|
|
|
41.0 |
% |
|
$ |
209,721 |
|
|
|
43.6 |
% |
Provider Services |
|
|
145,962 |
|
|
|
51.7 |
|
|
|
117,235 |
|
|
|
48.2 |
|
|
|
287,182 |
|
|
|
51.9 |
|
|
|
232,936 |
|
|
|
48.5 |
|
Pharmacy Services |
|
|
20,793 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
19,927 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
41,398 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
39,623 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
(988 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(752 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(1,960 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(1,712 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
282,110 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
243,289 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
553,608 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
480,568 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payer Services |
|
|
77,545 |
|
|
|
66.7 |
|
|
|
69,947 |
|
|
|
65.4 |
|
|
|
152,872 |
|
|
|
67.3 |
|
|
|
136,578 |
|
|
|
65.1 |
|
Provider Services |
|
|
89,268 |
|
|
|
61.2 |
|
|
|
71,963 |
|
|
|
61.4 |
|
|
|
175,439 |
|
|
|
61.1 |
|
|
|
143,521 |
|
|
|
61.6 |
|
Pharmacy Services |
|
|
8,872 |
|
|
|
42.7 |
|
|
|
7,254 |
|
|
|
36.4 |
|
|
|
17,535 |
|
|
|
42.4 |
|
|
|
13,979 |
|
|
|
35.3 |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
(928 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(720 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,835 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,648 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs of operations |
|
|
174,757 |
|
|
|
61.9 |
|
|
|
148,444 |
|
|
|
61.0 |
|
|
|
344,011 |
|
|
|
62.1 |
|
|
|
292,430 |
|
|
|
60.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development and engineering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payer Services |
|
|
2,869 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
2,992 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
5,727 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
5,966 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Provider Services |
|
|
4,713 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
3,898 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
9,032 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
7,762 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Pharmacy Services |
|
|
1,776 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
1,805 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
3,501 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
3,520 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total development and engineering |
|
|
9,358 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
8,695 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
18,260 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
17,248 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales, marketing, general and admin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payer Services |
|
|
7,058 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
6,206 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
13,871 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
13,166 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
Provider Services |
|
|
9,439 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
6,810 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
19,955 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
13,700 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
Pharmacy Services |
|
|
1,287 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
1,503 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
2,589 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
3,061 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales, marketing, general and admin
excluding corporate |
|
|
17,724 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
14,487 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
36,290 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
29,861 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from segment operations |
|
|
80,271 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
71,663 |
|
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
155,047 |
|
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
141,029 |
|
|
|
29.3 |
|
Corporate expense |
|
|
13,774 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
11,756 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
26,855 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
22,501 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
38,934 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
29,278 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
76,956 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
57,053 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
27,563 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
30,629 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
51,236 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
61,475 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
12,653 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
15,919 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
25,282 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
31,584 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
Other (gain) loss |
|
|
(2,235 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(2,060 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(3,638 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(1,770 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
|
17,148 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
16,775 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
29,598 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
31,669 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
7,920 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
9,520 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
13,095 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
20,152 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
9,228 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
7,255 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
16,503 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
11,517 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
3,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Emdeon Inc. |
|
$ |
5,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All references to percentage of revenues for expense components refer to the percentage of revenues for such segment. |
|
(2) |
|
See Note 15-Segment Reporting to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for further detail of our revenues within each reportable segment. |
32
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
Revenues
Our total revenues were $282.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to
$243.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $38.8 million, or 16.0%.
On an overall basis, revenues for our payer services, provider services and pharmacy services
segments were adversely affected during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 by the
continued impact of lower healthcare utilization driven by high unemployment and other adverse
economic factors. Additional factors affecting our revenues are described in the following
paragraphs.
Our payer services segment revenue is summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
Claims management |
|
$ |
52,972 |
|
|
$ |
49,695 |
|
|
$ |
3,277 |
|
Payment services |
|
|
62,507 |
|
|
|
56,504 |
|
|
|
6,003 |
|
Intersegment revenue |
|
|
864 |
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
116,343 |
|
|
$ |
106,879 |
|
|
$ |
9,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims management revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2011 increased by $3.3 million,
or 6.6%, as compared to the prior year period. Claims management revenues for the three months
ended June 30, 2011 include $4.1 million related to the EquiClaim acquisition. Excluding this
revenue, claims management revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2011 decreased by $0.8
million, or 1.7%, as compared to the prior year period primarily due to the impact of market
pricing pressures on our average transaction rates.
Payment services revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2011 increased by approximately
$6.0 million, or 10.6%, as compared to the prior year period. This increase was primarily driven by
new sales and implementations and the impact of the U.S. postage rate increase effective in April
2011.
Our provider services segment revenue is summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
Patient statements |
|
$ |
65,022 |
|
|
$ |
65,705 |
|
|
$ |
(683 |
) |
Revenue cycle management |
|
|
72,945 |
|
|
|
43,511 |
|
|
|
29,434 |
|
Dental |
|
|
7,871 |
|
|
|
7,947 |
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
Intersegment revenue |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
145,962 |
|
|
$ |
117,235 |
|
|
$ |
28,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patient statements revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2011 decreased by $0.7
million, or 1.0%, as compared to the prior year period primarily due to customer attrition,
partially offset by new sales and implementations and the impact of the U.S. postage rate increase
effective in April 2011.
Revenue cycle management revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2011 increased by $29.4
million, or 67.6%, as compared to the prior year period. Revenue cycle management revenues for the three months ended June
30, 2011 included $27.4 million related to the CEA and Chapin acquisitions. Excluding these
revenues, revenue cycle management revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2011 increased by
$2.0 million, or 4.7%. This increase was primarily due to new sales and implementations, partially
offset by customer attrition.
33
Dental revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2011 were generally consistent with those
reflected in the prior year period.
Our pharmacy services segment revenues were $20.8 million for the three months ended June 30,
2011 as compared to $19.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $0.9
million, or 4.3%. This increase was primarily due to new sales
and implementations.
Cost of Operations
Our total cost of operations was $174.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as
compared to $148.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $26.3 million,
or 17.7%.
Our cost of operations for our payer services segment was approximately $77.5 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $69.9 million for the three months ended June 30,
2010, an increase of $7.6 million, or 10.9%. As a percentage of revenue, our payer services cost of
operations increased to 66.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to 65.4% for the
three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in our payer services cost of operations is
primarily due to revenue growth in payment services, including the impact of the U.S. postage rate increase effective in April 2011, and the inclusion of the
EquiClaim business acquired in May 2011. The increase as a percentage of revenue was primarily due
to changes in revenue mix between our payment services solutions,
which generally have higher costs of operations and our historical
claims management services, which generally have lower costs of
operations.
Our cost of operations for our provider services segment was $89.3 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $72.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010,
an increase of $17.3 million, or 24.0%. As a percentage of revenue, our provider services cost of
operations was generally consistent at 61.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared
to 61.4% for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in our provider services cost of
operations is primarily due to the inclusion the CEA and Chapin businesses acquired in 2010 and the
impact of the U.S. postage rate increase effective in April 2011. This increase in provider
services cost of operations was partially offset by a change in revenue mix between our patient
statements services, which generally have a higher cost of operations and revenue cycle management
services, which generally have a lower cost of operations. The generally consistent level of
provider services cost of operations as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to this change in
revenue mix.
Our cost of operations for our pharmacy services segment was $8.9 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $7.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, an
increase of $1.6 million, or 22.3%. The increase in pharmacy services cost of operations and as a
percentage of revenue was primarily attributable to additional customer service personnel and costs
incurred in advance of the launch of new solutions to pharmacies.
Development and Engineering Expense
Our total development and engineering expense was $9.4 million for the three months ended June
30, 2011 as compared to $8.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $0.7
million, or 7.6%. The increase in development and engineering expense
was primarily related to the
inclusion of the development and engineering infrastructures associated with our recently acquired
businesses.
Sales, Marketing, General and Administrative Expense (Excluding Corporate Expense)
Our total sales, marketing, general and administrative expense (excluding corporate expense)
was $17.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $14.5 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $3.2 million, or 22.3%.
Our sales, marketing, general and administrative expense for our payer services segment was
$7.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $6.2 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $0.9 million, or 13.7%. The increase in our payer
services sales, marketing, general and administrative expense was primarily due to a change in
incentive compensation arrangements related to certain solutions and the inclusion of the EquiClaim
business acquired in May 2011.
34
Our sales, marketing, general and administrative expense for our provider services segment was
$9.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $6.8 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $2.6 million, or 38.6%. The increase in our provider
services sales, marketing, general and administrative expense was primarily due to the inclusion of
the infrastructures associated with the CEA and Chapin acquisitions.
Our sales, marketing, general and administrative expense for our pharmacy services segment was
$1.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $1.5 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of $0.2 million, or 14.4%. The decrease in pharmacy services sales, marketing, general and administrative expense
was primarily due to transfers of administrative personnel to
operations roles in connection with integration activities.
Corporate Expense
Our corporate expense was $13.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared
to $11.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $2.0 million, or 17.2%.
Corporate expense includes approximately $2.6 million of equity-based compensation for the three
months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $1.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Excluding this equity-based compensation, corporate expense was $11.2 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $10.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, an
increase of $1.1 million, or 11.1%. This increase was primarily due to additional personnel costs to
support the Companys growth.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Our depreciation and amortization expense was $38.9 million for the three months ended June
30, 2011 as compared to $29.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $9.7
million, or 33.0%. This increase was primarily due to depreciation of property and equipment placed
in service subsequent to June 30, 2010, as well as additional depreciation and amortization expense related to
acquisitions.
Interest Expense
Our interest expense was $12.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to
$15.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of $3.3 million, or 20.5%.
Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was reduced by $2.6 million related to a
change in the fair value of our interest rate swap agreement following our removal of its
designation as a cash flow hedge in October 2010. The remaining decrease was primarily due to a
scheduled decrease in the notional amount of our interest rate swap agreement of $111.6 million
that occurred on December 31, 2010 which caused less of our debt to be subject to the higher fixed
rate of our interest rate swap agreement during the three months ended June 30, 2011.
Income Taxes
Our income tax expense was $7.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared
to $9.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of $1.6 million, or 16.8%.
Differences between the federal statutory rate and the effective income tax rates for these periods
principally relate to the change in our book basis versus tax basis of our investment in EBS
Master, including the effect of income allocated to a noncontrolling interest, valuation allowance
changes, state income tax rate changes and the impact of other permanent differences relative to
pretax income. During the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recognized an
increase in income tax expense of $0.8 million and $1.4 million related to changes in valuation
allowances.
35
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
Revenues
Our total revenues were $553.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to
$480.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of approximately $73.0 million,
or 15.2%.
On an overall basis, revenues for our payer services, provider services and pharmacy services
segments were adversely affected during the six months ended June 30, 2011 by the continued impact
of lower healthcare utilization driven by high unemployment and other adverse economic factors.
Additional factors affecting our revenues are described in the following paragraphs.
Our payer services segment revenue is summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
Claims management |
|
$ |
100,526 |
|
|
$ |
94,843 |
|
|
$ |
5,683 |
|
Payment services |
|
|
124,742 |
|
|
|
113,324 |
|
|
|
11,418 |
|
Intersegment revenue |
|
|
1,720 |
|
|
|
1,554 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
226,988 |
|
|
$ |
209,721 |
|
|
$ |
17,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims management revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased by approximately
$5.7 million, or 6.0%, as compared to the prior year period. Claims management revenues for the
six months ended June 30, 2011 include $18.3 million related to the EquiClaim, FVTech and HTMS
acquisitions as compared to approximately $7.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Excluding these revenues, claims management revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2011 decreased
by $5.2 million, or 6.0%, as compared to the prior year period primarily due to the impact of
market pricing pressures on our average transaction rates.
Payment services revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased by approximately
$11.4 million, or 10.1%, as compared to the prior year period. This increase was primarily driven
by new sales and implementations and the impact of the U.S. postage rate increase effective in
April 2011.
Our provider services segment revenue is summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
Patient statements |
|
$ |
128,539 |
|
|
$ |
132,294 |
|
|
$ |
(3,755 |
) |
Revenue cycle management |
|
|
142,799 |
|
|
|
84,600 |
|
|
|
58,199 |
|
Dental |
|
|
15,604 |
|
|
|
15,884 |
|
|
|
(280 |
) |
Intersegment revenue |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
287,182 |
|
|
$ |
232,936 |
|
|
$ |
54,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patient statements revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2011 decreased by approximately
$3.8 million, or 2.8%, primarily due to customer attrition, partially offset by new sales and
implementations and the impact of the U.S. postage rate increase effective in April 2011.
Revenue cycle management revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2011 include $53.9 million
related to the CEA and Chapin acquisitions as compared to approximately $0.3 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2010. Excluding these revenues, revenue cycle management revenues for six
months ended June 30, 2011 increased by $4.6 million, or 5.5%. This increase was primarily due to
new sales and implementations, partially offset by customer attrition.
Dental revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2011 were generally consistent with those
reflected in the comparable prior year period.
36
Our pharmacy services segment revenues were $41.4 million for the six months ended June 30,
2011 as compared to $39.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of
approximately $1.8 million, or 4.5%. This increase was primarily due to new sales and
implementations.
Cost of Operations
Our total cost of operations was $344.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as
compared to $292.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of approximately
$51.6 million, or 17.6%.
Our cost of operations for our payer services segment was approximately $152.9 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $136.6 million for the six months ended June 30,
2010, an increase of approximately $16.3 million, or 11.9%. As a percentage of revenue, our payer
services cost of operations increased to 67.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared
to 65.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in our payer services cost of
operations is primarily due to revenue growth in payment services, including the impact of the U.S. postage rate increase effective in April 2011, and the inclusion of the
acquired FVTech, HTMS and EquiClaim businesses. The increase as a percentage of revenue was
primarily due to changes in revenue mix between our payment services solutions and recently
acquired FVTech, HTMS and EquiClaim businesses, which generally have higher cost of operations, as
compared to our historical claims management services, which generally have lower cost of
operations.
Our cost of operations for our provider services segment was $175.4 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $143.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, an
increase of approximately $31.9 million, or 22.2%. As a percentage of revenue, our provider
services segment cost of operations decreased to 61.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as
compared to 61.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in our provider services
cost of operations is primarily due the inclusion of the CEA and Chapin
businesses acquired in 2010 and the impact of the U.S. postage rate increase effective in April
2011. This increase in provider services cost of operations was partially offset by a change in
revenue mix between our patient statements services, which generally have higher cost of
operations, and revenue cycle management services, which generally have lower cost of operations.
The decrease in our provider services cost of operations as a
percentage of revenue was primarily
due to this change in revenue mix.
Our cost of operations for our pharmacy services segment was $17.5 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $14.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, an
increase of approximately $3.6 million, or 25.4%. The increase in pharmacy services cost of
operations and as a percentage of revenue was primarily attributable to additional customer service
personnel and costs incurred in advance of the launch of new solutions to pharmacies.
Development and Engineering Expense
Our total development and engineering expense was $18.3 million for the six months ended June
30, 2011 as compared to $17.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of
approximately $1.0 million, or 5.9%. The increase was primarily due to the inclusion of the
development and engineering infrastructures associated with our recently acquired businesses.
Sales, Marketing, General and Administrative Expense (Excluding Corporate Expense)
Our total sales, marketing, general and administrative expense (excluding corporate expense)
was $36.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $29.9 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of approximately $6.4 million, or 21.5%.
Our sales, marketing, general and administrative expense for our payer services segment was
approximately $13.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $13.2 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of approximately $0.7 million, or 5.4%. The
increase in our payer services sales, marketing, general and
administrative expense was primarily
due to the inclusion of the infrastructures associated with recently acquired businesses.
Our sales, marketing, general and administrative expense for our provider services segment was
approximately $20.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $13.7 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of approximately $6.3 million, or 45.7%. The
increase in our provider services sales, marketing, general and
administrative expense was primarily
due to the inclusion of the infrastructures associated with recently acquired businesses.
37
Our sales, marketing, general and administrative expense for our pharmacy services segment was
approximately $2.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $3.1 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of approximately
$0.5 million, or 15.4%. The decrease in pharmacy services sales, marketing, general and administrative expense
was primarily due to transfers of administrative personnel to
operations roles in connection with integration activities.
Corporate Expense
Our corporate expense was $26.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to
$22.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of approximately $4.4 million, or
19.4%. Corporate expense includes approximately $4.9 million
and $3.5 million of equity-based compensation for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. Excluding this equity-based compensation, corporate expense was $21.9 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $19.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010,
an increase of approximately $2.9 million, or 15.2%. The increase over the prior year period was
impacted by a favorable lease termination adjustment during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Apart from this non-recurring item, the remaining increase was primarily due to additional
personnel costs to support the Companys growth.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Our depreciation and amortization expense was $77.0 million for the six months ended June 30,
2011 as compared to $57.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of
approximately $19.9 million, or 34.9%. This increase was primarily due to depreciation of property
and equipment placed in service subsequent to June 30, 2010, as well as additional depreciation and
amortization expense related to acquisitions.
Interest Expense
Our interest expense was $25.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to
$31.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of approximately $6.3 million, or
20.0%. Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was reduced by $5.2 million related
to a change in the fair value of our interest rate swap agreement following our removal of its
designation as a cash flow hedge in October 2010. The remaining
decrease was primarily due to a
scheduled decrease in the notional amount of our interest rate swap agreement of approximately
$111.6 million that occurred on December 31, 2010 which caused less of our debt to be subject to
the higher fixed rate of our interest rate swap agreement during the six months ended June 30,
2011.
Income Taxes
Our income tax expense was $13.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to
$20.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, a
decrease of approximately $7.1 million, or 35.0%.
Differences between the federal statutory rate and the effective income tax rates for these periods
principally relate to the change in our book basis versus tax basis of our investment in EBS
Master, including the effect of income allocated to a noncontrolling interest, valuation allowance
changes, state income tax rate changes and the impact of other permanent differences relative to
pretax income. During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recognized an
increase in income tax expense of approximately $1.4 million and $5.8 million related to changes in
valuation allowances.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
We are a holding company with no material business operations. Our principal asset is the
equity interests we own in our majority-owned subsidiary, EBS Master. We conduct all of our
business operations through the direct and indirect subsidiaries of EBS Master. Accordingly, our
only material sources of cash are borrowings under our credit agreements and dividends or other
distributions or payments that are derived from earnings and cash flow generated by the
subsidiaries of EBS Master.
We have financed our operations primarily through cash provided by operating activities,
private sales of EBS Master Units, borrowings under our credit agreements and the IPO. As of June
30, 2011, we had cash and cash equivalents of $122.5 million as compared to $99.2 million as of
December 31, 2010. We believe that our existing cash on hand, cash generated from operating
activities and available borrowings under our revolving credit agreement ($50.0 million as of June
30, 2011) will be sufficient to service our existing debt, finance internal growth, fund capital
expenditures and fund small to mid-size acquisitions.
38
Our cash balances in the future may be reduced if we expend our cash on capital expenditures,
future acquisitions or elect to make optional prepayments under our credit agreements. In addition,
if any of the lenders participating in our revolving credit agreement become insolvent, it may make
it more difficult for us to borrow under our revolving credit agreement, which could adversely
affect our liquidity. Credit market instability also may make it more difficult for us to obtain
additional financing or refinance our existing credit facilities in the future on acceptable terms
or at all. If we were unable to obtain such additional financing when needed or were unable to
refinance our credit facilities, our financial condition and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected.
Cash Flows
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $102.4
million as compared to $89.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The $13.3 million
increase is related primarily to business growth and the timing of collections and disbursements.
Cash provided by operating activities can be significantly impacted by our non-cash working
capital assets and liabilities, which may vary based on the timing of cash receipts that fluctuate
by day of week and/or month and be impacted by cash management decisions.
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $73.8 million as
compared to $80.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Cash used in investing
activities for each of the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 included capital
expenditures for property and equipment and cash consideration paid in connection with
acquisitions.
Financing Activities
Cash used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $5.3 million as
compared to $3.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Cash used in financing activities
for both the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 consisted of required principal payments under
our credit agreements.
Credit Facilities
In November 2006, our subsidiary, EBS LLC, entered into the first lien credit agreement, which
we refer to as the First Lien Credit Agreement, and the second lien credit agreement, which we
refer to as the Second Lien Credit Agreement, each as amended from time to time. Together, we
refer to the First Lien Credit Agreement and the Second Lien Credit Agreement as the Credit
Agreements. The original term loan borrowings under the First Lien Credit Agreement provided us
$805.0 million of total available financing, consisting of a secured $755.0 million term loan
facility and a secured $50.0 million revolving credit facility. In October 2010, EBS LLC borrowed
an additional $100.0 million pursuant to an incremental term loan facility under an amendment to
the First Lien Credit Agreement.
The revolving credit facility provides for the issuance of standby letters of credit, in an
aggregate face amount at any time not in excess of $12.0 million. The issuance of standby letters
of credit reduces the available capacity under our revolving credit facility. In addition, under
the terms of the First Lien Credit Agreement, we can borrow up to an additional $100.0 million in
additional incremental term loans and increase the available capacity under the revolving credit
facility by $25.0 million, provided that the aggregate amount of such increases may not exceed
$100.0 million. There were no borrowings on our revolving credit facility as of June 30, 2011.
The original term loan borrowings outstanding under the First Lien Credit Agreement amounted
to $675.0 million as of June 30, 2011, and bear interest, at our option, at either an adjusted
LIBOR rate plus 2.00% or the lenders alternate base rate plus 1.00%, or a combination of the two.
In addition, under the October 2010 $100.0 million incremental term loan facility, we are required
to pay interest, at our option, at either an adjusted LIBOR rate plus 3.00% (subject to a LIBOR
floor of 1.50%) or the lenders alternate base
39
rate plus 2.00% (subject to an alternate base rate
floor of 2.50%). Other than the interest rate, the incremental term loans are on substantially the
same terms as the original term loans incurred under the First Lien Credit Agreement. Not including
optional prepayments, we are generally required to make quarterly principal payments through 2013
on an aggregate basis of approximately $2.1 million on our term loan facilities under the First
Lien Credit Agreement.
We are required to pay a commitment fee of 0.5% per annum, provided that our total leverage
ratio is greater than or equal to 4.0:1, and otherwise 0.375% per annum on the undrawn portion of
the revolving credit facility. We are permitted to prepay the revolving credit facility or the term
loans (including the $100.0 million incremental term loans) under the First Lien Credit Agreement
at any time. We are required to prepay amounts outstanding under the First Lien Credit Agreement
with proceeds we receive from asset sales that generate proceeds in excess of $1.0 million if not
reinvested (as defined in the Credit Agreements), from indebtedness we incur that is not
specifically permitted to be incurred under the First Lien Credit Agreement, with any excess cash
flow (as defined in the First Lien Credit Agreement) we generate in any fiscal year and from
casualty events.
Our Second Lien Credit Agreement is a term loan facility with an aggregate principal amount of
$170.0 million, which was the amount outstanding as of June 30, 2011. Borrowings outstanding under
the Second Lien Credit Agreement bear interest, at our option,
at either an adjusted LIBOR rate plus 5.00% or the lenders alternate base rate plus 4.00%, or
a combination of the two. Although we are permitted to prepay the loans under our Second Lien
Credit Agreement at any time, the terms of our First Lien Credit Agreement restrict our ability to
make such prepayments to the amount of previous years retained excess cash flow (as defined under
the Credit Agreements) and only if our total leverage ratio is 4.0:1 or better.
The revolving portion of the First Lien Credit Agreement matures in November 2012 and the term
loans (including the additional $100.0 million incremental term loans) mature in November 2013. The
Second Lien Credit Agreement matures in May 2014. We anticipate refinancing our Credit Agreements
prior to or as of their maturity dates. We cannot be certain that we will be successful in our
refinancing efforts on acceptable terms or at all, which could have an adverse effect on our
liquidity and results of operations.
The obligations of EBS LLC under the Credit Agreements are unconditionally guaranteed by EBS
Master and all of its subsidiaries and are secured by liens on substantially all of EBS Masters
assets, including the stock of its subsidiaries.
As of June 30, 2011, total borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreements amounted to
$944.3 million (before unamortized debt discount of $35.9 million primarily related to the
adjustment of our long-term debt to fair value in connection with the 2008 Transaction). Under the
revolving portion of our First Lien Credit Agreement, we had $50.0 million in available borrowing
capacity at June 30, 2011.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the weighted average cash interest rate of our
borrowings under our Credit Agreements (including the net cash payments under our interest rate
swap) was approximately 4.2%. Approximately $240.3 million of our weighted average debt
outstanding during the period was subject to a fixed interest rate of 4.94% under our interest rate
swap agreement plus the relevant spread.
Covenants
The Credit Agreements require us to satisfy specified financial covenants, including a minimum
interest coverage ratio and a maximum total leverage ratio, as set forth in the Credit Agreements.
The interest coverage ratio is calculated as the ratio of earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation, amortization and certain other items that are non-recurring, non-cash or unusual in
nature (defined as Consolidated EBITDA in the Credit Agreements) to cash interest expense (i.e.
interest expense less amortization of discount or premium and loan costs). The minimum interest
coverage ratio permitted was 3.15:1.0 at June 30, 2011 and increases at varying intervals over time
until October 1, 2011, at which time it is fixed at 3.5:1.0. At June 30, 2011, we estimate our
interest coverage ratio as defined under the Credit Agreements to be approximately 6.8 to 1.0.
The total leverage ratio is calculated as the ratio of net debt (i.e. total debt less excess
cash as defined in the Credit Agreements) to Consolidated EBITDA. The maximum total leverage ratio
permitted was 3.50:1.0 at June 30, 2011 and declines at varying intervals
40
over time until October
1, 2011, at which time it is fixed at 3.0:1.0. At June 30, 2011, we estimate our total leverage
ratio to be approximately 3.1 to 1.0 which, under the terms of the Credit Agreements, reflected
only $35.0 million of the cash on our balance sheet at June 30, 2011 as a reduction of our net
debt.
The Credit Agreements also limit us with respect to amounts we may spend on capital
expenditures. As defined in the Credit Agreements, capital expenditures exclude certain items such
as the expenditures made with the retained portion of excess cash flow, replacement of property and
equipment, additions funded with equity offering proceeds and additions funded with proceeds of
asset sales. The limitation varies based on certain base expenditure levels included in the Credit
Agreements and the amount of unused capital expenditures from the previous calendar year, if any,
as well as allowable amounts transferred from future year expenditure limits. For the year ending
December 31, 2011, our capital expenditures (as defined under the Credit Agreements) are limited to
$62.0 million including allowable transfers from 2012. For the years ending December 31, 2012 and
2013, our capital expenditures are limited to $63.0 million each year, excluding any carryovers
from previous years. We currently expect our capital expenditures for 2011 to be approximately
$55.0 million to $60.0 million.
The Credit Agreements contain negative covenants that may restrict the operation of our
business, including our ability to incur additional debt, create liens, make investments, engage in
asset sales, enter into transactions with affiliates, enter into sale-leaseback transactions and
enter into hedging arrangements. In addition, our Credit Agreements restrict the ability of EBS
Master and its
subsidiaries to make dividends or other distributions to us, issue equity interests,
repurchase equity interests or certain indebtedness or enter into mergers or consolidations.
As of June 30, 2011, we were in compliance with all of the financial and other covenants under
the Credit Agreements.
The Credit Agreements do not contain provisions that would accelerate the maturity date of the
loans under the Credit Agreements upon a downgrade in our credit ratings. However, a downgrade in
our credit ratings could adversely affect our ability to obtain other capital sources in the future
and could increase our cost of borrowings.
As a result of the recently announced proposed merger agreement with an entity formed by Blackstone Capital Partners VI L.P.,
Standard & Poors announced that it was lowering our corporate credit rating from BB- to B+.
Events of default under the Credit Agreements include non-payment of principal, interest, fees
or other amounts when due; violation of certain covenants; failure of any representation or
warranty to be true in all material respects when made or deemed made; cross-default and
cross-acceleration to indebtedness with an aggregate principal amount in excess of $15.0 million;
certain ERISA events; dissolution, insolvency and bankruptcy events; and actual or asserted
invalidity of the guarantees or security documents. In addition, a Change of Control (as such
term is defined in the Credit Agreements) is an event of default under the Credit Agreements. Some
of these events of default allow for grace periods and materiality qualifiers.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of the
time of filing of this Quarterly Report, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements or
obligations, other than those related to surety bonds of an insignificant amount.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Our recent accounting pronouncements are summarized in Note 2 to our unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements beginning on Page 8 of this Quarterly Report.
41
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We have interest rate risk primarily related to borrowings under the Credit Agreements. The
original term loan borrowings under the First Lien Credit Agreement bear interest, at our option,
at either an adjusted LIBOR rate plus 2.00% or the lenders alternate base rate plus 1.00%, or a
combination of the two, and borrowings under the Second Lien Credit Agreement bear interest, at our
option, at either an adjusted LIBOR rate plus 5.00% or the lenders alternate base rate plus 4.00%,
or a combination of the two. In October 2010, we borrowed an additional $100.0 million under an
incremental term loan facility through an amendment to the First Lien Credit Agreement. The
incremental term loan facility bears interest at our option at either an adjusted LIBOR rate plus
3.00% (subject to a LIBOR floor of 1.50%) or the lenders alternate base rate plus 2.00% (subject
to an alternate base rate floor of 2.50%).
As of June 30, 2011, we had outstanding borrowings (before unamortized debt discount of $35.9
million) of $774.3 million under the First Lien Credit Agreement and $170.0 million under the
Second Lien Credit Agreement.
We manage our interest rate risk through the use of an interest rate swap agreement. Effective
December 31, 2006, we entered into an interest rate swap to exchange three month LIBOR rates for
fixed interest rates, resulting in the payment of an all-in fixed rate of 4.94% on an initial
notional amount of $786.3 million which amortizes on a quarterly basis until maturity at December
30, 2011. At June 30, 2011, the notional amount of the interest rate swap was $239.2 million. As a
result, as of June 30, 2011, $705.1 million of our total borrowings were effectively subject to a
variable interest rate.
A change in interest rates on variable rate debt impacts our pretax earnings and cash flows.
Based on our outstanding debt as of June 30, 2011, and assuming that our mix of debt instruments,
interest rate swap and other variables remain the same, the annualized effect of a one percentage
point change in variable interest rates would have a pretax impact on our earnings and cash flows
of approximately $7.2 million. In addition to the effect of changes in variable rates on the
interest we pay, beginning October 1, 2010 (the date we removed the designation of our interest
rate swap as a cash flow hedge), our interest expense is also affected by fluctuations in the fair
value of our interest rate swap.
In the future, in order to manage our interest rate risk, we may enter into additional
interest rate swaps, modify our existing interest rate swap or make changes that may impact our
ability to treat our interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge. However, we do not intend or expect
to enter into derivative or interest rate swap transactions for speculative purposes.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and
Chief Financial Officer (CFO), management has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and Rule
15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of June
30, 2011. Based upon that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that, as of June 30, 2011, our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective in causing material information relating to us
(including our consolidated subsidiaries) to be recorded, processed, summarized and reported by
management on a timely basis and to ensure the quality and timeliness of our public disclosures
with SEC disclosure obligations.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes to our internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the six months ended June 30, 2011, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
42
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On or about August 5, 2011, plaintiff Harold Litwin filed a putative class action in Delaware Chancery Court
against the Company, its directors, Blackstone Capital Partners VI L.P., H&F and GA seeking to preliminarily
enjoin the proposed merger of the Company and an entity formed by Blackstone Capital Partners VI L.P to acquire
the Company. Plaintiff alleged that the Companys directors breached their fiduciary duties in connection with the
proposed transaction, and the Company allegedly aided and abetted those breaches. No amount of damages is stated
in the complaint. The Company believes the allegations are without merit.
In
addition, in the normal course of business, the Company is subject to claims, lawsuits and legal
proceedings. While it is not possible to ascertain the ultimate outcome of such matters, in
managements opinion, the liabilities, if any, in excess of amounts provided or covered by
insurance, are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations or liquidity.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The discussion of the Companys business and operations should be read together with the risk factors contained
under the heading Risk Factors in our Form 10-K, which describes various risks and uncertainties to which we are
or may be subject. These risks and uncertainties have the potential to affect our business, financial condition and
results of operations, cash flows and prospects in a material adverse manner. As of the date hereof, there have been
no material changes to the risk factors set forth in our Form 10-K, except as follows:
Failure
to complete the proposed sale of control of the Company to an entity
formed by Blackstone Capital Partners VI L.P. could have a material
adverse effect on us.
On August 3, 2011, the Company entered into a
definitive merger agreement (the Merger Agreement) with
Blackstone Capital Partners VI L.P. (Buyer) under which this Blackstone fund will acquire a controlling interest in
the Company (the Merger). Consummation of the Merger is subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger
Agreement, including, but not limited to the approval of our
stockholders and clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act. There can be no assurance that our
stockholders will approve the Merger Agreement or that the other conditions to the completion of the Merger will be
satisfied. If the Merger is not completed for any reason, the price of our Class A common stock will likely decline to
the extent that the market price of our Class A common stock reflects market assumptions that the Merger will be
completed. Additionally, we are subject to additional risks in connection with the Merger, including: (i) the
occurrence of an event, change or circumstance that could give rise to the payment of a termination fee to Buyer
pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, (ii) the outcome of any legal proceedings that have been or may be
instituted against us and others relating to the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, (iii) the failure of
the Merger to close for any reason or the failure of Buyer to obtain the necessary debt financing set forth in the
commitment letters provided to us in connection with the Merger, (iv) the restrictions imposed on our business,
properties and operations pursuant to the affirmative and negative covenants set forth in the Merger Agreement and
the potential impact of such covenants on our business, (v) the risk that the proposed transaction will divert
managements attention resulting in a potential disruption of
the Companys current business plan, (vi) the effect of the
announcement of the Merger on our business relationships, operating results and business generally and (vii) the
amount of fees, expenses and charges incurred by the Company in connection with the Merger.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. REMOVED AND RESERVED
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
The exhibits listed on the accompanying Exhibit Index are filed, furnished or incorporated by
reference (as stated therein) as part of this Quarterly Report.
43
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMDEON INC.
|
|
Date: August 9, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ George I. Lazenby
|
|
|
|
George I. Lazenby, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 9, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Bob A. Newport
|
|
|
|
Bob A. Newport, Jr., Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
44
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
|
2.1
|
|
Agreements and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 3, 2011,
by and among Beagle Parent Corp., Beagle Acquisition Corp. and Emdeon Inc. (included as
Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 8, 2011, and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith). |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith). |
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Scheme Document |
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document |
45