e10vk
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
JUNE 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD
FROM TO
|
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER
000-30083
QUALSTAR CORPORATION
|
|
|
CALIFORNIA
|
|
95-3927330
|
(STATE OF
INCORPORATION)
|
|
(I.R.S. EMPLOYER ID
NO.)
|
3990-B HERITAGE OAK COURT, SIMI VALLEY, CA 93063
(805) 583-7744
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title
of Each Class:
|
|
Name
of Each Exchange on Which Registered:
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act of
1933. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is not required to
file reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports); and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No
o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer o Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 12b-2). Yes o No þ
As of December 31, 2005, the aggregate market value of the
common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was
approximately $24,751,000.
The total shares of common stock without par value outstanding
at September 15, 2006 is 12,253,117.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of registrants definitive proxy statement for its
annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2007 are
incorporated by reference into Part III of this
Form 10-K.
QUALSTAR
CORPORATION
FORM 10-K
FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2006
INDEX
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Forward-looking statements inherently are subject to risks and
uncertainties, some of which we cannot predict or quantify. Our
actual results may differ materially from the results projected
in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such
a difference include, but are not limited to, those discussed in
ITEM 1A Risk Factors, and in
ITEM 7 Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
You generally can identify forward-looking statements by the use
of forward-looking terminology such as believes,
may, will, expects,
intends, estimates,
anticipates, plans, seeks,
or continues, or the negative thereof or variations
thereon or similar terminology. Forward looking statements also
include the assumptions underlying or relating to any such
statements. Forward looking statements contained within this
document represent a good-faith assessment of Qualstars
future performance for which management believes there is a
reasonable basis. Qualstar disclaims any obligation to update
the forward looking statements contained herein, except as may
be required by law.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
INTRODUCTION
We design, develop, manufacture and sell automated magnetic tape
libraries used to store, retrieve and manage electronic data
primarily in network computing environments. Tape libraries
consist of cartridge tape drives, tape cartridges and robotics
to move the cartridges from their storage locations to the tape
drives under software control. Our tape libraries provide data
storage solutions for organizations requiring backup, recovery
and archival storage of critical data. Our products are
compatible with commonly used operating systems, including UNIX,
Windows, and Linux. Our tape libraries are also compatible with
a wide range of storage management software packages, such as
those supplied by Computer Associates, EMC/Legato, Tivoli,
Symantec/Veritas, CommVault and BakBone Software. We offer tape
libraries for multiple tape drive technologies, including LTO,
AIT, Super AIT, and SuperDLT.
We sell our tape libraries worldwide, primarily to value added
resellers, system integrators and original equipment
manufacturers. These customers typically integrate our tape
libraries with software from third party vendors and related
hardware such as servers and network components to provide
storage solutions, which are then sold to end users. We
configure our libraries based on each customers individual
requirements, with a normal delivery time of one to three
working days. This rapid fulfillment of customer orders allows
our resellers to minimize their inventory levels and allows us
to compete effectively with distribution channels used by our
competitors.
Qualstar was incorporated in California in 1984. Our initial
products were IBM compatible 9-track
reel-to-reel
tape drives. In 1995, we entered the tape automation market with
a series of tape libraries incorporating 8mm tape drives. Since
that time, we have introduced a succession of tape library
models designed to work with the leading automation-capable tape
drive technologies. Automated tape libraries and related
products, such as tape drives and tape media, represented
approximately 66.2% of revenues for fiscal 2006, approximately
75.1% of revenues for fiscal 2005, and approximately 81.4% of
revenues for fiscal 2004. Sales of power supplies, services and
other products accounted for the balance of our revenues.
In July 2002, we purchased the assets of N2Power, Incorporated,
a supplier of ultra small high efficiency open-frame switching
power supplies. Power supplies provided by N2Power are utilized
within some of our tape library products as well as sold to
original equipment manufacturers and contract manufacturers for
incorporation into their products. N2Power products are sold
under the N2Power brand name as well as under a private label
brand name through independent sales representatives and
1
distributors. Revenues from N2Power products totaled
approximately 11.9% of revenues for fiscal 2006, 5.0% of
revenues for fiscal 2005 and 1.8% of revenues for fiscal 2004.
INDUSTRY
BACKGROUND
Storing, managing and protecting data has become critical to the
operation of many enterprises and governments as the world
economy becomes increasingly information dependent. The data
storage industry is growing in response to the increase in the
amount of data that is generated and that must be preserved. The
amount of data has been increasing due to the growth in the
number of computers, the number, size and complexity of computer
networks and software applications, and the emergence of new
applications such as image processing, internet services,
medical image storage, video and motion picture image storage,
and other multi-media applications. In addition, businesses
continue to generate increasing amounts of traditional business
information with respect to their products, customers and
financial data. This increase in the amount of data that is
generated stimulates increases in the demand for data storage
and the management of this data.
FACTORS DRIVING
GROWTH IN DATA STORAGE
|
|
|
|
|
Increased demand from Internet businesses. The
growth in the Internet has created businesses that depend on the
creation, access to and archival storage of data. We believe
this demand will continue to grow as individuals and businesses
increase their reliance on the Internet for communications,
commerce and data retrieval.
|
|
|
|
Growth in new types of data. New types of data
are also fueling the growth in data storage. For example,
graphics, audio, video, medical and security images, and
multi-media uses such as video on demand, require far greater
storage capacity than text and financial data.
|
|
|
|
Recognition of the critical importance of
data. Corporate databases contain useful
information about customer records, order patterns and other
factors that can be analyzed and transformed into a valuable
asset and a competitive advantage. The ability to efficiently
store, manage and protect this information is important to the
value and success of many businesses. The usefulness of past and
present data is further enhanced by sophisticated data mining
software applications that can access and analyze large
databases.
|
|
|
|
Growing awareness of the need for disaster
protection. Companies are recognizing that
without their data they may not survive. Natural disasters, as
well as overt and covert actions targeted at individual
companies, classes of users or whole countries, can destroy data
and entire data centers, threatening a companys very
existence. Systematic replication and secure off-site storage of
corporate data is recognized as the best defense against
catastrophic data loss. Tape libraries are a key technology in
most corporate data disaster protection plans.
|
|
|
|
Compliance with new regulatory requirements for records
retention. Many businesses now have to deal with
new regulatory requirements from various governmental agencies
that require businesses to retain data for longer periods of
time. The regulations that have received the most visibility
include HIPAA requirements covering medical records;
Sarbanes-Oxley, which addresses corporate governance; and
Rule 17a under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
regarding recordkeeping requirements for the securities
industry. These regulations and others are projected to increase
demand for long-term storage capacity over the next few years.
|
|
|
|
Growth in network computing applications and
data. The use of computer networks has shifted
critical information and applications to network servers to
allow more people to gain access to stored data as well as to
create new data. As the speed of network computing has
increased, numerous new applications have become feasible such
as computer fax and
e-mail, all
of which generate progressively more data. Organizations are
increasingly aware of the need to protect this data, as networks
become a mission-critical element of many operations.
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in the costs of storing data. The
costs of data storage have decreased with advances in technology
and improved manufacturing processes. We expect these costs to
continue to decrease. The decrease in the cost of data storage
encourages the storage of more data and makes it more cost
effective to simply add more storage capacity than to remove old
data, which in the past may have been purged periodically.
|
ADVANCES IN
STORAGE MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES
The growth in data is contributing to an evolution in
traditional storage solutions. New technologies are designed to
provide high-speed connectivity for data-intensive applications
across multiple operating systems, including UNIX, Windows, and
Linux. These new methods of storage and data management
technologies include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Fibre Channel. Fibre Channel is an interface
technology based on industry standards for the connection of
storage devices to networks. Interface is the term used to
describe the electronics, cabling and software used to
facilitate communications between devices. With Fibre Channel,
users are better able to share stored information with other
storage devices and servers over longer distances, with faster
data transfer speeds, thereby increasing the importance of
storage area networks.
|
|
|
|
Storage Area Networks. Storage Area Network,
or SAN, architecture applies the inherent benefits of a
networked approach to data storage applications, which allows
data to move efficiently and reliably between multiple storage
devices and servers. The benefits of SAN architecture also
include increasing the expandability of existing storage
solutions and providing a higher level of connectivity than
exists with traditional technologies. Additionally, SANs are
able to provide these benefits across multiple operating systems.
|
|
|
|
Advanced storage management software. This
software automatically migrates infrequently accessed data to
the lower cost storage medium such as a tape library. A
users request for this data at some later date will recall
the data automatically from the tape library. This process
reduces the overall storage cost by using the least expensive
storage medium to store data that is not expected to be needed
on a frequent basis. Advances in storage management software
have increased the ability of businesses to more
cost-effectively store, manage and retrieve data, which in turn
allows businesses to operate more efficiently.
|
|
|
|
Network Attached Storage. Current storage
devices are dependent on a file server for all commands and
control. Network attached storage devices give storage devices
file server functionality, which allow users to plug a storage
device directly into a network without requiring a separate file
server. This allows users to maintain, or even enhance, system
performance while saving on both time and cost.
|
TYPES OF DATA
STORAGE
Current non-volatile storage solutions are based primarily on
two technologies: magnetic disk and magnetic tape. These
technologies represent a compromise among a variety of competing
factors including capacity, cost, speed, portability and data
reliability. Magnetic tapes are removable, which allows them to
be transported easily to an off-site location for security or
protection from physical harm. Magnetic disks provide quicker
access to stored data and generally are used when speed is
important. Less frequently used data is often migrated from
magnetic disks to tape storage. Tape libraries provide an online
solution, where less frequently used data files are stored on
tape at substantially lower cost compared to disk while still
providing automated access.
3
TAPE LIBRARIES
AND APPLICATIONS
Tape libraries automate the tape loading process, eliminate
errors induced by human operators, and enhance security compared
to tapes that must be retrieved and loaded manually. Tape
libraries can also be operated from remote locations around the
clock, thus, eliminating the need for an operator. Automated
tape libraries are a key component in a companys overall
storage solution and data protection strategy.
Tape drives and tape media are the two key components of tape
libraries. The costs of tape drives and tape media have declined
with advances in technology, and we expect this trend to
continue. As prices decline, new applications for automated
storage become justified, further increasing the number of
applications that can benefit from the use of tape libraries. We
believe that continued technological improvements in tape drives
and tape media will continue to reduce overall storage costs in
the future.
Current and emerging applications for tape libraries include:
|
|
|
|
|
Automated backup. Backup is the creation of a
duplicate copy of current data for the purpose of recovering the
data in the event the original is lost or damaged. An automated
tape library, in conjunction with storage management software,
can backup network data at any time without human intervention.
A library with multiple tape drives can backup data using all of
its drives simultaneously, thus significantly speeding up the
recording process. Backup tapes can be removed from the library
and stored in an off-site location for protection against a loss
of the primary site.
|
|
|
|
Archiving. Archiving is the storage of data
for historical purposes. When information is stored on tape,
automated tape libraries, under application control, can catalog
tapes for future retrieval and prevent unauthorized removal or
corruption of data by using password or key lock protection.
Archival tapes provide a historic record for use in fraud
detection, audit, legal and other processes. Tape libraries are
also used for archiving due to benefits offered by the tape
medium, such as long-term data integrity, resistance to
environmental contamination, ease of relocation, low cost, and
the availability of Write Once Read Many or WORM
tapes.
|
|
|
|
Image management. Storage-intensive
applications such as satellite mapping and medical image
management systems are turning to tape libraries because of the
cost advantage over traditional storage methods. X-ray images or
MRI results, for instance, must frequently be kept on file for
years. Storing a digitized image in a tape library costs
considerably less than storing a film copy, and can be retrieved
years later with the click of a mouse.
|
DISTRIBUTION OF
TAPE LIBRARY PRODUCTS
The requirements for storage solutions vary depending on the
size of an enterprise, the type of data generated and the amount
of data to be stored. With the increased dependence on stored
data, most organizations, regardless of their size, have a
heightened need for storage solutions that integrate devices
such as tape drives, tape libraries and storage management
software. Those organizations with sufficient in-house
information technology resources can rely on their internal
infrastructure and expertise to design, purchase and implement
their own storage solutions. These organizations may elect to
purchase equipment from distributors or directly from the
original equipment manufacturers. Many organizations, however,
do not have sufficient in-house resources but have the same need
for data storage solutions. These organizations often look to
value added resellers to design, supply and install their
storage solutions.
Value added resellers develop and install storage solutions for
enterprises that face complex storage needs but lack the
in-house capability of designing and implementing the proper
solution or have chosen to outsource these functions. Typically,
the value added reseller will select among a variety of
different hardware technologies and software options, as well as
provide installation and other services, to deliver a complete
storage solution for the end user. Value added resellers require
rapid turnaround of orders, custom configuration of tape
libraries, drop shipment to their customers site,
software, and marketing and technical support.
4
Original equipment manufacturers generally resell products made
by others under their own brand name and typically assume
responsibility for product sales, service and support. Original
equipment manufacturers enable manufacturers, such as Qualstar,
to reach end users not served by other channels and to serve
select vertical markets where specific original equipment
manufacturers have exceptional strength. Original equipment
manufacturers require special services such as product
configuration control, extensive qualification testing, custom
colors and private labeling.
OUR
SOLUTIONS
We offer storage solutions that respond to the growing data
management challenges facing businesses today, while addressing
the unique needs of value added resellers and original equipment
manufacturers.
We believe that high reliability is important to the end users
of our products due to the critical nature of the data that is
being stored, shorter time periods available for the
back-up
operations, and the operation of backup systems during hours
when personnel may not be available to respond to problems. To
address these concerns, we emphasize quality and reliability in
the design, manufacturing and testing of our products which
reduces the potential for product failures and results in
products that require little maintenance.
The technology utilized in automated tape libraries is
continuously evolving due to advances in data recording methods,
component cost reductions, advances in semiconductor and
microprocessor technologies, and a general trend toward
miniaturization in the electronics industry. This changing
technology requires that we continuously develop and market new
products to prevent our product lines from becoming obsolete.
Our tape libraries are compatible with over forty-five(45)
third-party storage management software packages, including
those supplied by Computer Associates, EMC/Legato, Tivoli,
Symantec/Veritas, CommVault and BakBone Software. Storage
management software enables network administrators to allocate
the use of storage technologies among user groups or tasks, to
manage data from a central location, and to retrieve, transfer
and backup data between multiple workstations. We believe that
storage management software is a crucial component of any
automated storage installation, and lack of compatibility is a
significant barrier to entry for new tape library competitors.
To ensure compatibility, our engineers work with independent
software vendors during the product development cycles. We do
not have contracts with any independent software vendors, nor do
we need access to their software code to design our products. We
maintain relationships with them by supplying tape libraries so
they can qualify their software to work with our tape libraries
and by evaluating their software for compatibility with our tape
libraries. We also support our relationships with them by
keeping them informed about current and anticipated changes to
our products and by referring business to them when value added
resellers or end users inquire about storage management software
sources.
STRATEGY
Our goals are to enhance our position as a supplier of automated
tape libraries and to maintain or increase our market share in
each of the tape formats in which we compete. To achieve these
goals, we intend to:
|
|
|
|
|
Offer libraries for multiple tape drive
technologies. We offer tape libraries for a range
of tape drive technologies, including LTO, AIT, Super AIT, and
SuperDLT. By offering products based on multiple tape drive
technologies, we reduce our dependence on the success of any
single tape technology and can offer products that target the
specific preferences of resellers and original equipment
manufacturers and their end user customers.
|
|
|
|
Focus on value added reseller channels. We
sell our products primarily through selected value added
resellers who have a strong market presence, have demonstrated
the ability to work directly
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
with end users, and who maintain relationships with major
vendors of storage management software. Because we market our
products primarily through this channel, we have implemented a
variety of programs to support and enhance our relationships
with our reseller partners. These programs are designed to
benefit the reseller and increase the likelihood of selling our
products. We intend to maintain our marketing presence in
support of this channel. We conduct business with our value
added resellers on an individual purchase order basis and no
long-term purchase commitments are involved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintain and strengthen original equipment manufacturer
relationships. We sell our products to several
companies under private label or original equipment manufacturer
relationships. Original equipment manufacturer sales enable us
to reach some end users not served by our value added resellers.
The same product characteristics that make our tape libraries
attractive to value added resellers also are important to
original equipment manufacturers. We conduct business with our
original equipment manufacturer customers on an individual
purchase order basis and no long-term purchase commitments are
involved.
|
|
|
|
Develop libraries for new tape
technologies. The tape drive industry is
continuously advancing the state of technology. We will continue
to design new libraries for those technologies that appear
promising and that meet our standards for capacity, quality and
reliability.
|
We believe that our experience, efficiency and strict control
over the development and manufacture of new products are key
factors in the successful execution of our strategy. We design
our tape libraries with a high percentage of common parts, use
quality components and minimize the number of moving parts. We
utilize proprietary techniques in the design, production and
testing of our libraries in order to simplify the manufacturing
process and reduce our costs. We manufacture all of our products
at a single facility and we control our inventory closely to
provide rapid delivery to our customers. These steps allow us to
design and bring to market new products rapidly in response to
changing technology.
PRODUCTS
Tape
Libraries
We offer a number of tape library families, each capable of
incorporating one or more tape drive technologies, as summarized
in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tape Drive
|
|
Range of Tape
|
|
|
Maximum
Capacity
|
|
Product
Family
|
|
Technology
|
|
Cartridges
|
|
|
in
Terabytes(1)
|
|
|
TLS-4000
|
|
Sony AIT
|
|
|
12 to 600
|
|
|
|
120.0
|
|
TLS-5000
|
|
Sony SAIT
|
|
|
33 to 264
|
|
|
|
132.0
|
|
TLS-6000
|
|
Quantum SDLT
|
|
|
10 to 240
|
|
|
|
72.0
|
|
TLS-8000
|
|
LTO
|
|
|
11 to 264
|
|
|
|
105.6
|
|
RLS-4000
|
|
Sony AIT
|
|
|
22 to 70
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
RLS-5000
|
|
Sony SAIT
|
|
|
16 to 44
|
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
RLS-6000
|
|
Quantum SDLT
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
RLS-8000
|
|
LTO
|
|
|
12 to 44
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
|
XLS Series
|
|
LTO
|
|
|
295-2805
|
(2)
|
|
|
1122.0
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
A Terabyte is one million megabytes, or one thousand gigabytes.
The table shows native capacity and excludes gains from data
compression, which can increase capacity by more than 100%. |
|
(2) |
|
2,805 tapes and 1,122.0 terabytes reflect the product
configuration at its initial release stage. Planned future
releases of internal firmware will allow expansion to as high as
6,265 tapes and 2,506.0 terabytes using LTO-3 tape technology. |
Our tape library families include a number of models that differ
in storage capacity, price and features. Our libraries are
installed in network computing environments ranging from small
departmental networks
6
to enterprise-wide networks supporting hundreds of users. We
believe that selling products for multiple tape drive
technologies insulates us somewhat from the dynamics of the
marketplace as various tape standards compete for market share.
This helps our products appeal to the broadest possible range of
end user market segments. This wide range of products makes us a
one-stop supplier for our value added reseller and original
equipment manufacturer customers, enabling them to meet most end
user requirements for a specific tape format.
Tape libraries generally contain two or more tape drives and
from ten to thousands of tapes. We design our tape libraries for
continuous, unattended operation. Multiple tape drives allow
simultaneous access to different data files by different users
on the network, and increase the rate at which data can move on
to, out of, or within the network. A library with multiple tape
drives can back up data using all drives simultaneously,
significantly speeding up the recording process. In some of our
libraries, tape cartridges are stored in removable magazines,
allowing for easy bulk removal of the tapes. Our libraries also
offer features such as barcode readers to scan cartridge labels
and an input/output port for importing and exporting tapes under
system control. Several of our library models are expandable in
the field by increasing the number of tape storage positions.
This feature provides the end user with the ability to increase
data capacity as storage needs grow.
We continue to develop and release new libraries to expand our
product offerings to meet the changing demands of the
marketplace. In addition, we continue to enhance and improve our
existing products to maintain our competitive position.
Some of our tape libraries incorporate a number of specialized
features that we believe improve reliability, serviceability and
performance, including:
|
|
|
|
|
Rapid tape drive replacement. We design our
libraries so that a tape drive can be replaced quickly without
special tools. This feature minimizes the off-line time required
when a tape drive must be replaced, and frequently avoids the
high cost and delays of a service call.
|
|
|
|
Fibre Channel connectivity. We offer a Fibre
Channel option on many of our models for connection to Storage
Area Networks and other high performance applications.
|
|
|
|
Closed-loop servo control. Our tape libraries
use digital closed-loop servo control for robotic motion to
provide precise tape handling. This yields motion that is
smooth, repeatable and highly reliable.
|
|
|
|
Brushless motors. Motors are a key component
in any robotic system. We use only brushless electric motors in
our tape libraries. Brushless motors provide longer life and
less electrical noise compared to conventional brush-type
motors. We build many of our own motors in order to obtain
optimum performance and reliability.
|
|
|
|
Remote management. Many larger companies with
global
back-up
requirements or disaster management programs require tape
libraries that can be located off-site in various regions, but
that must be administered from a single location. With our
remote library manager, customers can put libraries anywhere in
the world and manage them from a single administrative hub using
a standard web browser.
|
Our RLS Series of tape libraries are designed to fit efficiently
in equipment racks and provide
back-up
capacity in only five standard units, or a total of
8.75 inches of rack space. In addition, some models in the
RLS series were designed to support dual-redundant power
supplies and hot-swappable tape drives.
Power
Supplies
In addition to tape libraries, we design, manufacture, and sell
ultra small, open frame, high efficiency switching power
supplies. These power supplies are used to convert AC line
voltage to DC for use in a wide variety of electronic equipment
such as telecommunications equipment, machine tools, routers,
switches, wireless systems and gaming devices.
7
Our power supplies are sold under the N2 Power brand. We have
specialized in units that are less than
13/4
inches high and that are optimized for high efficiency
operation. The high efficiency allows the units to be operated
in confined spaces without heating up the surrounding equipment.
We believe that as worldwide energy concerns and energy costs
rise, our high efficiency approach will become more important.
Additionally, these products are utilized within some of our
tape library products.
Other
Products
We also sell ancillary products related to our tape libraries,
such as tape media, tape magazines, cables, bar code labels and
fibre channel adapters.
SALES AND
MARKETING
Sales
We sell our tape library products primarily through value added
resellers. Our sales force will initiate contact with value
added resellers who are candidates to sell our tape libraries.
We strive to develop relationships with resellers who have
expertise in storage management applications, established
relationships with end users and the experience to understand
and satisfy their customers needs.
We believe that by selling directly to value added resellers, we
have an advantage over competitors who will often sell directly
to end users, thereby competing with their resellers. Some of
the advantages of our strategy include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Higher profit margins. Focusing on this
channel, we achieve economies that result in higher profit
margins to be shared by both the reseller and us.
|
|
|
|
Custom configurations. We offer custom
configurations of our products, such as special paint, private
branding and non-standard options, on very short notice.
|
|
|
|
Channel conflicts avoided. We refer
substantially all end user inquiries to our reseller partners.
Frequently, our sales force will make end user visits with
resellers to help close a pending sale.
|
|
|
|
Credit. We extend credit terms to resellers
who meet our credit requirements.
|
|
|
|
Rapid delivery. We generally ship a product
within one to three working days of confirming an order,
rivaling the delivery time of competitors that use distributors
to bring products to market.
|
Although we sell our tape libraries primarily to value added
resellers, we believe that original equipment manufacturers are
an important element of our business. The sales cycle for
original equipment manufacturers generally encompasses six
months to one year and may involve extensive product and system
qualification testing, evaluation, integration and verification.
Original equipment manufacturers typically assume responsibility
for product sales, service and support.
Our international sales are currently directed from our
corporate offices in Simi Valley, California. European sales are
coordinated through our European sales office in the United
Kingdom. All of our international sales are denominated in
U.S. dollars. Revenues from customers outside of North
America were approximately $5.7 million, or 26.1% of
revenues in fiscal 2006, approximately $6.9 million, or
27.3% of revenues in fiscal 2005, and approximately
$10.2 million or 32.4% of revenues in fiscal 2004.
Our sales are spread across a broad customer base. Revenues from
Qualstars two largest customers combined were
approximately 13.4%, 13.9%, and 14.6% for the years ended
June 30, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively and no single
customer accounted for more than 10% of our revenue.
8
Marketing
We support our sales efforts with a broad array of marketing
programs designed to generate brand awareness, attract and
retain qualified value added resellers and inform end users
about the advantages of our products. We provide our resellers
with a full range of marketing materials, including product
specifications, sales literature, software connectivity
information and product application notes.
We train our resellers to sell our products and to answer
customers questions. We advertise in key publications and
participate in trade shows. We display our products under the
Qualstar brand name at some trade shows and participate in other
trade shows in partnership with our principal suppliers and
resellers. We support our marketing and customer support with a
website that features comprehensive marketing and product
information.
We conduct sales and technical training classes for our
resellers. We also conduct various promotional activities for
resellers and end users, including product-specific rebates and
cooperative advertising.
CUSTOMER SERVICE
AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT
We believe that strong customer service and technical support is
an essential aspect of our business. Our customer service and
technical support efforts consist of the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
Technical support. Our technical support
personnel are available twenty-four hours per day, Monday
through Friday. Technical support personnel are available to all
customers at no charge by telephone, facsimile and
e-mail to
answer questions and solve problems relating to our products.
Estimated costs of this service are provided for when revenue is
recognized. Our technical support personnel are trained in all
aspects of our products. Our support staff is located at our
headquarters in Simi Valley, California. We sell service
contracts for
on-site
service of our tape libraries installed within the United States
and Canada, which are fulfilled by IBM Corporation and
on-site
service contracts sold in Europe are fulfilled by Eastman Kodak
S.A. Commercial Imaging Group.
|
|
|
|
Sales engineering. Our engineers provide
pre-sales support to our resellers, and post-sales support if
necessary. Engineers typically become involved in more complex
problem-solving situations involving interactions between our
products, third-party software, network server hardware and the
network operating systems. Engineers work with resellers and end
users over the telephone and at an end user site as required.
|
|
|
|
Training. We offer a product maintenance
training program for end users, value added resellers, original
equipment manufacturers, customer service and technical support
personnel. We conduct training classes at our headquarters.
|
|
|
|
Warranty. The warranty period on our tape
libraries is three years. Some TLS and all RLS models have three
year advance replacement warranty coverage that provides for
replacement of components or, if necessary, complete libraries.
All other TLS models have a one year advance replacement
warranty with the second and third year being
return-to-factory
for service at no charge. Customers may purchase extended
advance replacement service coverage and
on-site
service if they are located in the United States, Canada and
some countries within Europe.
|
MANUFACTURING AND
SUPPLIERS
We manufacture all of our tape libraries at our facility in Simi
Valley, California. We operate our manufacturing on one daily
eight-hour
shift. However, if required, we have the ability to add a second
or third shift to increase our capacity.
To respond rapidly to orders, we build our tape libraries to a
semi-finished state, perform full testing and then place the
tape libraries in a holding area until an order is received.
Once an order is confirmed, we remove the unit from the holding
area, install tape drives and configure the unit to meet the
specific requirements of the order, retest and then ship.
9
The manufacturing cycle to bring our libraries to a
semi-finished state is approximately five working days for our
TLS and RLS libraries and approximately 30 working days for our
XLS libraries. We believe that this process represents an
effective way to control our inventory levels while maintaining
the ability to fill specific orders in short lead times. We
coordinate inventory planning and management with suppliers and
customers to match our production to market demand. Once we
confirm an order, we generally ship the product within one to
three working days. We believe this response time is among the
fastest in the industry and gives us a competitive edge. Because
we fill the majority of our orders as they are received, our
backlog generally is small and is not indicative of future
revenues.
We carefully select our suppliers based on their ability to
provide quality parts that meet our specifications and volume
requirements. Inventory planning and management is coordinated
closely with suppliers to match our production needs. Many of
the components assembled into our libraries are
off-the-shelf
parts, which reduces the risk of part shortages and allows us to
maintain inventory of these parts at a minimum. A number of our
component parts are not available off the shelf, but are
designed to our specifications for integration into our products.
Tape drives and tape media are available only from a limited
number of suppliers, some of which are sole-source providers.
Some of our suppliers compete with us by selling their own tape
libraries. The risk of allocation is greater upon the
introduction of a new tape drive technology. Any disruption in
supplies of tape drives or tape media could delay shipments of
our products.
COMPETITION
The market for automated tape libraries is intensely competitive
and characterized by rapidly changing technology and evolving
standards. Because we offer a broad range of libraries for
different tape drive technologies, we tend to have a large
number of competitors that differ depending on the particular
format and performance level. Our principal competitors in this
market segment include Sun/StorageTek, Quantum Corporation,
Overland Storage, Inc., and Spectra Logic Corporation.
Many of our competitors have substantially greater financial and
other resources, better name recognition, larger research and
development staffs, and more capabilities in manufacturing,
marketing and distributing products than we do. Our competitors
may develop new technologies and products that are more
effective than our products. We are not ISO-9000 certified,
unlike some of our competitors, which may limit some
customers ability to purchase our products.
As competitors introduce products in a particular tape drive
technology, the increased competition normally results in price
erosion and a reduction in gross margins for all competitors. We
cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully
against either current or potential competitors or that
competition will not cause a reduction in our revenues or profit
margins. We believe that our ability to compete depends on a
number of factors, including the success and timing of new
product developments by us and by our competitors, compatibility
of our products with a broad range of computing systems, product
performance, reliability, price, marketing and sales execution
and customer support. Specifically, we believe that the
principal competitive factors in the selection of a tape library
include:
|
|
|
|
|
reliability of the robotic assembly that handles the tape
cartridges;
|
|
|
|
initial purchase price;
|
|
|
|
storage capacity;
|
|
|
|
speed of data transfer;
|
|
|
|
compatibility with existing operating systems and storage
management software;
|
|
|
|
after-sale expandability of a tape library to meet increasing
storage requirements;
|
|
|
|
expected product life, cost of maintenance and total cost of
ownership; and
|
|
|
|
physical configuration and power requirements of the library.
|
10
We believe our tape libraries compete favorably overall with
respect to many of these factors.
RESEARCH AND
DEVELOPMENT
Our research and development team consists of engineers and
technicians who have data storage and related industry
experience. We have developed over 40 separate tape library
models for eleven different tape formats over the last eleven
years.
Our research and development efforts rely on the integration of
multiple engineering disciplines to generate products that meet
market needs in a competitive and timely fashion. Successful
development of automated tape libraries requires the integration
of mechanical design, electronic design packaging, and firmware
design into a single product. Product success also relies on the
engineering groups thorough knowledge of each of the
different tape drive technologies.
We frequently develop new products in response to the
availability of a new tape drive technology. As tape drive
manufacturers compete in the marketplace, they continually
invest in research and development to gain performance
leadership either by offering increasingly enhanced versions of
their current tape drive products or by introducing an entirely
new tape drive technology. We benefit from these industry
developments by utilizing the new technology in our products.
Our engineers work closely with the tape drive manufacturers
through the drive development cycle to assure that reliable tape
library and tape drive combinations are brought to market.
The design architecture of our tape libraries makes use of
common parts across most product families, allowing us to
develop and introduce new products quickly. If a new tape drive
is an advanced version of one already incorporated in one or
more of our products, our time and dollar investment to
incorporate the new drive can be relatively small, with the
primary focus being on verification testing. When the form
factors differ, the time and investment requirements can grow
substantially, and may require development of a new product
family altogether.
We also develop new products as we identify emerging market
needs. Our sales, marketing, product development and engineering
groups identify products to fulfill customer and marketplace
needs. Our research and development group concentrates on
leveraging previous engineering investments into new products.
For example, our firmware is based on successive generations of
the operating system developed for our first library. We also
use common parts in our different library series and leverage
our electro-mechanical and electronic hardware technology from
previous products into next generation designs. In some cases,
entire subassemblies are transferable, leveraging not only
engineering time but also materials purchasing, inventory
stocking and manufacturing efforts.
Our research and development expenses were approximately
$3.1 million in fiscal 2006, approximately
$3.8 million in fiscal 2005, and approximately
$4.3 million in fiscal 2004. We anticipate research and
development costs to remain about the same in fiscal 2007.
INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY
We rely on copyright protection of our firmware, as well as
patent protection for some of our designs and products. We also
rely on a combination of trademark, trade secret and other
intellectual property laws to protect our proprietary rights.
However, we do not believe our intellectual property provides
significant protection from competition. We believe that,
because of the rapid pace of technological change in the tape
storage industry, patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret
protection are less significant than factors such as the
knowledge, ability and experience of our personnel and timely
new product introductions.
We enter into Employee Proprietary Information and Inventions
Agreements with our engineers along with all employees and
consultants to protect our technology and designs. However, we
do not believe that such protection can preclude competitors
from developing substantially equivalent products.
11
EMPLOYEES
As of September 12, 2006, we had 89 employees, including 30
in operations and manufacturing, 22 in research and development,
6 in customer service and technical support, 17 in sales and
marketing, and 14 in administration and finance. We also employ
a small number of temporary employees and consultants as needed.
We are not a party to any collective bargaining agreement or
other similar agreement. We believe that we have a good
relationship with our employees.
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Executive Officers
Officers are elected by and serve at the discretion of the board
of directors. The executive officers of Qualstar as of
September 25, 2006 are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
William J. Gervais
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer,
President, Director and Acting Chief Financial Officer(1)
|
Richard A. Nelson
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
Vice President of Engineering,
Secretary and Director
|
David L. Griffith
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Vice President of Operations
|
Robert K. Covey
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Vice President of Marketing
|
Robert C. King
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
Vice President of Sales
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our previous Chief Financial Officer resigned effective as of
August 18th,
2006. We are actively searching for a new Chief Financial
Officer. In the interim, Mr. Gervais is serving in the
capacity of Chief Financial Officer. |
Background
William J. Gervais is a founder of Qualstar and has been
our President and a director since our inception in 1984, and
was elected Chief Executive Officer in January 2000. From 1984
until January 2000, Mr. Gervais also served as our Chief
Financial Officer. From 1981 until 1984, Mr. Gervais was
President of Northridge Design Associates, Inc., an engineering
consulting firm. Mr. Gervais was a co-founder, and served
as Engineering Manager from 1976 until 1981, of Micropolis
Corporation. Mr. Gervais earned a B.S. degree in Mechanical
Engineering from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
in 1967.
Richard A. Nelson is a founder of Qualstar and has been
our Vice President of Engineering, Secretary and a director
since our inception in 1984. From 1974 to 1984, Mr. Nelson
was self employed as an engineering consultant specializing in
microprocessor technology. Mr. Nelson earned a B.S. in
Electronic Engineering from California State Polytechnic
University, Pomona in 1966.
David L. Griffith, our Vice President of Operations,
joined the company in October of 2001. From 1999 to 2001,
Mr. Griffith served as the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Stardrive Solutions Inc., a software solutions
provider for the broadcast automation industry. From 1998 to
1999, Mr. Griffith was the Corporate Vice President of
Business Development at Tandberg Data ASA where he was
responsible for the development of worldwide business plans and
corporate expansion activities. From 1994 to 1998,
Mr. Griffith was the President and Chief Executive Officer
of Tandberg Data, Inc. located in Simi Valley, California. From
1990 to 1994, Mr. Griffith was the Vice President of Sales
and Marketing for Tandberg Data, Inc. From 1987 to 1990,
Mr. Griffith acted as Marketing Manager and Program Manager
for the Memory Products Group of Siemens Information Systems.
Mr. Griffith received a degree in Mechanical Engineering
from California State Polytechnic University in 1980.
Robert K. Covey has been our Vice President of Marketing
since 1994. From 1986 to 1993 Mr. Covey was regional
manager of ATG Cygnet, an optical disk library firm. From 1982
to 1985, Mr. Covey served as
12
national sales manager at Micropolis Corporation, a former disk
drive manufacturer. Mr. Covey attended Butler University
and Bentley College from 1965 to 1968.
Robert C. King was appointed our Vice President of Sales
in June 2005. From 1999 until it was acquired by JDS Uniphase in
2004, Mr. King was Vice President, Sales for E2O
Communications, a manufacturer of optical transceivers. From
1995 to 1998 Mr. King was Vice President, Sales and
Marketing for Advanced Photonix. From 1992 to 1995,
Mr. King served as Vice President, Sales and Marketing for
Performance Materials Corporation. From 1989 to 1992,
Mr. King served as Vice President, Market and Business
Development for PCO, a subsidiary of Corning Incorporated.
Mr. King holds a B.S.M.E. degree from Ohio University in
Athens, Ohio.
ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
contains forward-looking statements, as described at page 3
of this report under the caption Forward-Looking
Statements. We believe that the risks described below are
the most important factors which may cause our actual future
results of operations to differ materially from the results
projected in the forward-looking statements.
RISKS RELATED TO
OUR BUSINESS
The principal risks applicable to our business in general are
described below. Specific risks applicable to our tape library
and power supply operating segments are described in the
following subsections of Item 1A.
We have a limited
number of executives. The loss of any single executive or the
failure to hire and integrate capable new executives could harm
our business.
The success of our business is tied closely to the managerial,
engineering and business acumen of our existing executives.
William J. Gervais, our President, has been largely responsible
for the development of most of our tape libraries, has overseen
our operations and growth, and established and maintained our
strategic relationships. We expect that he will continue these
efforts for the foreseeable future. Our future success will also
depend on our ability to attract, retain and motivate key
executives and other key personnel, many of whom have been
instrumental in developing new technologies and strategic plans.
We may not be able to retain our existing personnel or attract
additional qualified personnel in the future. However, our
current dependence on a limited number of executives and other
key personnel, for whom replacements may be difficult to find,
entails a risk that we may not be able to supervise and manage
our ongoing operations.
Our lack of
significant order backlog makes it difficult to forecast future
revenues and operating results.
We normally ship products within a few days after orders are
received. Consequently, we do not have significant order backlog
and a large portion of our revenues in each quarter result from
orders placed during that quarter. Because backlog can be an
important indicator of future revenues, our lack of backlog
makes it more difficult to forecast our future revenues. Since
our operating expenses are relatively fixed in the short term,
unexpected fluctuations in revenues could negatively impact our
quarterly operating results.
Our research and
development spending may not yield results that justify the
costs incurred.
In recent fiscal years we have spent substantial amounts for
research and development. Our products and markets are
technologically advanced and rapidly evolving, and we cannot be
assured that these efforts will successfully provide us with new
or upgraded products that will be competitive. If these
13
programs are not successful, our investment in research and
development will not yield corresponding benefits to us.
Our customers
have the right to return our products in certain circumstances.
An excessive number of returns may reduce our
revenues.
Our customers have 30 days from the date of purchase to
return products that do not conform to an end users
requirements. Distributors have additional return privileges
that extend well beyond 30 days. We may otherwise allow
product returns if we think that doing so maximizes the
effectiveness of our sales channels and promotes our reputation
for quality and service.
Although we estimate and reserve for potential returns in our
reported financial results, actual returns could exceed our
estimates. If the number of returns exceeds our estimates, our
financial results could be adversely impacted for the periods
during which returns are made.
We may spend
money pursuing sales that do not occur when anticipated or at
all.
Original equipment manufacturer customers typically conduct
significant evaluation, testing, implementation and acceptance
procedures before they begin to market and sell new products.
This evaluation process is lengthy and may range from six months
to one year or more. This process is complex and may require
significant sales, marketing, engineering and management
resources on our part. The process becomes more complex as we
simultaneously qualify our products with multiple customers or
pursue large orders with a single customer. As a result, we may
expend resources to develop customer relationships before we
recognize any revenue from these relationships, if at all.
We sell a
significant portion of our products to customers located outside
the United States. Currency fluctuations and increased costs
associated with international sales could make our products
unaffordable in foreign markets, which would reduce our revenue
or profitability.
Revenues from shipments to customers outside of North America
accounted for approximately 26.1% of revenues in fiscal 2006,
approximately 27.3% of revenues in fiscal 2005 and approximately
32.4% of revenues in fiscal 2004. We believe that international
sales will continue to represent a significant portion of our
revenues. Our international sales subject us to a number of
risks, including:
|
|
|
|
|
political and economic instability may reduce demand for our
products or our ability to market our products in foreign
countries;
|
|
|
|
although we denominate our international sales in
U.S. dollars, currency fluctuations could make our products
unaffordable to foreign purchasers or more expensive compared to
those of foreign manufacturers;
|
|
|
|
restrictions on the export or import of technology may reduce or
eliminate our ability to sell in certain markets;
|
|
|
|
greater difficulty of administering business overseas may
increase the costs of foreign sales and support;
|
|
|
|
foreign governments may impose tariffs, quotas and taxes on our
products;
|
|
|
|
longer payment cycles typically associated with international
sales and potential difficulties in collecting accounts
receivable may reduce the profitability of foreign
sales; and
|
|
|
|
our current determination not to seek ISO-9000 certification, a
widely accepted method of establishing and certifying the
quality of a manufacturers operations, may reduce sales.
|
These risks may increase our costs of doing business
internationally and reduce our revenues or profitability.
14
A failure to
develop and maintain proprietary technology may negatively
affect our business.
We rely on copyright protection of electronic circuits and our
firmware, as well as patent protection for some of our designs
and products. We also rely on a combination of trademark, trade
secret, and other intellectual property laws and various
contract rights to protect our proprietary rights. However, we
do not believe our intellectual property rights provide
significant protection from competition. As a consequence, these
rights may not preclude competitors from developing products
that are substantially equivalent or superior to our products.
In addition, many aspects of our products are not subject to
intellectual property protection and therefore can be reproduced
by our competitors.
Intellectual
property infringement claims brought against us could be time
consuming and expensive to defend.
In recent years, there has been an increasing amount of
litigation in the United States involving patents and other
intellectual property rights. Qualstar is not currently directly
involved in any intellectual property litigation or proceedings.
However, in April 2004 we settled litigation that Raytheon
Company had filed alleging that Qualstar and eight other named
defendants infringed on a patent owned by Raytheon Company
entitled Mass Data Storage Library. In the future,
we may become subject to other claims or inquiries regarding our
alleged unauthorized use of a third partys intellectual
property. An adverse outcome in litigation could force us to do
one or more of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
stop selling, incorporating or using our products or services
that use the challenged intellectual property;
|
|
|
|
subject us to significant liabilities to third parties;
|
|
|
|
obtain from the owners of the infringed intellectual property
right a license to sell or use the relevant technology, which
license may not be available on reasonable terms, or at
all; or
|
|
|
|
redesign those products or services that use the infringed
technology, which redesign may be either economically or
technologically infeasible.
|
Whether or not an intellectual property litigation claim is
valid, the cost of responding to it, in terms of legal fees and
expenses and the diversion of management resources, could harm
our business.
Our warranty
reserves may not adequately cover our warranty
obligations.
We have established reserves for the estimated liability
associated with our product warranties. However, we could
experience unforeseen circumstances where these or future
reserves may not adequately cover our warranty obligations.
Our revenues and
operating results may fluctuate unexpectedly from quarter to
quarter, which may cause our stock price to decline.
Our quarterly revenues and operating results have fluctuated in
the past, and are likely to vary significantly in the future due
to several factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions affecting spending for information
technology;
|
|
|
|
increased competition and pricing pressures;
|
|
|
|
reductions in the size, delays in the timing, or cancellation of
significant customer orders;
|
|
|
|
shifts in product or distribution channel mix;
|
|
|
|
the timing of the introduction or enhancement of products by us,
our original equipment manufacturer customers or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
expansions or reductions in our relationships with value added
reseller and original equipment manufacturer customers;
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
financial difficulties affecting our value added reseller or
original equipment manufacturer customers that render them
unable to pay amounts owed to us;
|
|
|
|
market acceptance of new and enhanced versions of our products;
|
|
|
|
new product developments by storage device manufacturers, such
as disk drives, that could render our products less cost
effective or less competitive;
|
|
|
|
the rate of growth in the data storage market and the various
segments within it;
|
|
|
|
timing and levels of our operating expenses; and
|
|
|
|
availability of key components and performance of key suppliers.
|
We believe that period to period comparisons of our operating
results may not necessarily be reliable indicators of our future
performance. It is likely that in some future period our
operating results will not meet your expectations or those of
public market analysts.
Any unanticipated change in revenues or operating results is
likely to cause our stock price to fluctuate since such changes
reflect new information available to investors and analysts. New
information may cause investors and analysts to revalue our
stock and this, in the aggregate, may cause fluctuations in our
stock price.
Our officers and
directors could implement corporate actions that are not in the
best interests of our shareholders as a whole.
Our executive officers and directors own beneficially, in the
aggregate, approximately 43% of our outstanding common stock as
of June 30, 2006. As a result, these shareholders will be
able to exercise significant control over all matters requiring
shareholder approval, including the election of directors and
approval of significant corporate transactions, which could
delay or prevent someone from acquiring or merging with us. The
interests of our officers and directors, when acting in their
capacity as shareholders, may lead them to:
|
|
|
|
|
vote for the election of directors who agree with the incumbent
officers or directors preferred corporate
policy; or
|
|
|
|
oppose or support significant corporate transactions when these
transactions further their interests as incumbent officers or
directors, even if these interests diverge from their interests
as shareholders per se and thus from the interests of other
shareholders.
|
Some provisions
of our charter documents may make takeover attempts difficult,
which could depress the price of our stock and inhibit your
ability to receive a premium price for your shares.
Our board of directors has the authority, without any action by
the shareholders, to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of
preferred stock and to fix the rights and preferences of such
shares. In addition, our articles of incorporation and bylaws
contain provisions that eliminate cumulative voting in the
election of directors and require shareholders to give advance
notice if they wish to nominate directors or submit proposals
for shareholder approval. These provisions may have the effect
of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control, may
discourage bids for our common stock at a premium over its
market price and may adversely affect the market price, and the
voting and other rights of the holders of our common stock.
We do not
currently intend to pay dividends and therefore you will only be
able to recover your investment in our common stock, if at all,
by selling the shares of the stock that you own.
We historically have pursued a policy of reinvesting our
earnings in research and development, expanding our value added
reseller and original equipment manufacturer relationships, and
expanding our
16
manufacturing capabilities. Consequently, we have never paid
dividends on our shares of capital stock. We currently intend to
continue this policy for the foreseeable future to strengthen
our financial and competitive position in the markets in which
we operate.
Trading in our
stock has been limited and our stock price has been volatile.
Consequently, it may be difficult to sell your shares.
There has been very little trading in shares of our stock and
some days it does not trade at all. This, as well as the factors
listed below, has caused the price of our stock to be volatile.
Consequently, it may be difficult to sell your shares of our
stock at the price you paid for them or at a price equal to that
quoted on The Nasdaq Stock Market. Factors that may cause our
stock price to fluctuate in the future include:
|
|
|
|
|
quarterly variations in operating results, especially if they
differ from our previously announced forecasts or forecasts made
by analysts;
|
|
|
|
our announcements of anticipated future revenues or operating
results;
|
|
|
|
announcements concerning us, our competitors, our customers, or
our industry;
|
|
|
|
the introduction of new technology or products by us or our
competitors;
|
|
|
|
comments regarding us and the data storage market made by
industry analysts or on Internet bulletin boards;
|
|
|
|
changes in earnings estimates by analysts or changes in
accounting policies;
|
|
|
|
changes in product pricing policies by us or our
competitors; and
|
|
|
|
changes in general economic conditions.
|
In addition, stock markets have experienced extreme price and
volume volatility in recent years. This volatility has had a
substantial effect on the market prices of securities of many
smaller public companies for reasons frequently unrelated or
disproportionate to the operating performance of the specific
companies. These market fluctuations may adversely affect the
market price of our common stock.
RISKS RELATED TO
OUR TAPE LIBRARY BUSINESS
The principal risks applicable specifically to our tape library
operating segment are described below.
Our principal
competitors devote greater financial resources to developing,
marketing and selling automated tape libraries. Consequently, we
may be unable to maintain or increase our market
share.
We face significant competition in developing and selling
automated tape libraries. Rapid and ongoing changes in
technology and product standards could quickly render our
products less competitive, or even obsolete. We have
significantly fewer financial, technical, manufacturing,
marketing and other resources than many of our competitors and
these limited resources may harm our business in many ways. For
example, in the past several years our competitors have:
|
|
|
|
|
acquired other tape library companies;
|
|
|
|
increased the geographic scope of their market;
|
|
|
|
offered a wider range of tape library products; and
|
|
|
|
developed and acquired proprietary software and disk based
products that operate in conjunction with their products and the
products of their competitors.
|
17
In the future, our competitors may leverage their greater
resources to:
|
|
|
|
|
develop, manufacture and market products that are less expensive
or technologically superior to our products;
|
|
|
|
attend more trade shows and spend more on advertising and
marketing;
|
|
|
|
reach a wider array of potential customers through a broader
range of distribution channels;
|
|
|
|
respond more quickly to new or changing technologies, customer
requirements and standards; or
|
|
|
|
reduce prices in order to preserve or gain market share.
|
We believe competitive pressures are likely to continue. We
cannot guarantee that our resources will be sufficient to
address this competition or that we will manage costs and adopt
strategies capable of effectively utilizing our resources. If we
are unable to respond to competitive pressures successfully, our
prices and profit margins may fall and our market share may
decrease.
Our suppliers
could reduce shipments of tape drives and tape media. If this
occurs, we would be forced to curtail production, our revenues
could fall and our market share could decline.
Automated tape libraries and related products, such as tape
drives and tape media, represented approximately 66.2% of our
revenues for fiscal 2006, approximately 75.1% of our revenues
for fiscal 2005 and approximately 81.4% of our revenues for
fiscal 2004. We depend on a limited number of third-party
manufacturers to supply us with the tape drives and tape media
that we incorporate into our automated tape libraries. Some tape
drive manufacturers, including Sony Corporation and Quantum
Corporation, compete with us by also manufacturing tape
libraries. There can be no assurance that other tape drive
manufacturers will not also begin to manufacture libraries.
Historically, some of these suppliers have been unable to meet
demand for their products and have allocated their limited
supply among customers. If suppliers limit our supply of tape
drives or tape media, we may be forced to delay or cancel
shipments of our tape libraries. The major supplier risks we
face include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Sony Electronics, Inc. is our sole-source supplier of AIT and
Super AIT drives and media. In the past, Sony has allocated some
of their products and may allocate them again in the future. In
fiscal 2006 we derived approximately $7.9 million or 36.4%
of our revenues, in fiscal 2005 we derived approximately
$12.0 million, or 47.8%, of our revenues, and in fiscal
2004 we derived approximately $16.1 million, or 51.1% of
revenues from the sale of libraries, tape drives and tape media
based on Sony AIT and Super AIT technologies. If Sony reduces
its sales to us or raises its prices, we could lose revenues and
our margins could decline.
|
|
|
|
Quantum Corporation is our sole-source supplier of SuperDLT tape
drives and competes with us as a manufacturer of automated tape
libraries. In the past, Quantum has allocated quantities of tape
drives among its customers. It is possible that Quantum will
allocate again, and as a result, may be unable to meet our
future SuperDLT tape drive requirements.
|
|
|
|
The LTO standard was developed by an industry consortium
consisting of IBM, Hewlett Packard and Quantum/Certance. LTO
competes with AIT and other half-inch tape drives and media. All
three drive suppliers also sell automated tape libraries that
utilize LTO tape drives and compete with our products.
Therefore, even if we receive adequate allocation, it may be at
a price that renders our products uncompetitive.
|
Our other suppliers have in the past been, and may in the future
be, unable to meet our demand, including our needs for timely
delivery, adequate quantity and high quality. We do not have
long-term supply contracts with any of our significant
suppliers. The partial or complete loss of any of our suppliers
could result in lost revenue, added costs and production delays
or could otherwise harm our business and customer relationships.
18
Our revenues
could decline if we fail to execute our distribution strategy
successfully.
We distribute and sell our automated tape libraries primarily
through value added resellers and original equipment
manufacturers, and intend to continue this strategy for the
foreseeable future. Value added resellers integrate our tape
libraries with products of other manufacturers and sell the
combined products to their own customers. Original equipment
manufacturers combine our tape libraries with their own products
and sell the combined product under their own brand. We
currently devote, and intend to continue to devote, significant
resources to develop these relationships. A failure to initiate,
manage and expand our relationships with value added resellers
or original equipment manufacturers could limit our ability to
grow or sustain our current level of revenues.
Our focus on the distribution of our products through value
added resellers poses the following risks:
|
|
|
|
|
we may reach fewer customers because we depend on value added
resellers to market to end users and these value added resellers
may fail to market effectively or fail to devote sufficient or
effective sales, marketing and technical support to the sales of
our products;
|
|
|
|
we may lose sales because many of our value added resellers sell
products that compete with our products. These value added
resellers may reduce their marketing efforts for our products in
favor of products manufactured by our competitors;
|
|
|
|
our costs may increase as value added resellers generally
require a higher level of customer support than do original
equipment manufacturers; and
|
|
|
|
as the market for tape libraries matures, we expect that tape
libraries designed for small and medium size businesses will not
require the level of sales, marketing and technical support
traditionally provided by value added resellers and,
consequently, tape libraries for these customers will be
increasingly sold through distribution channels rather than
through value added resellers.
|
We depend upon our original equipment manufacturer
customers ability to develop new products, applications
and product enhancements that incorporate our products in a
timely, cost-effective and customer-friendly manner. We cannot
guarantee that our original equipment manufacturer customers
will meet these challenges effectively. Original equipment
manufacturers typically conduct substantial and lengthy
evaluation programs before certifying a new product for
inclusion in their product line. We may be required to devote
significant financial and human resources to these evaluation
programs with no assurance that our products will ever be
selected. In addition, even if selected by the original
equipment manufacturer, there generally is no requirement that
the original equipment manufacturer purchase any particular
amount of product from us or that it refrain from purchasing
competing products.
We do not have any exclusive agreements with our value added
resellers or original equipment manufacturers, who purchase our
products on an individual purchase order basis. If we lose
important value added resellers or original equipment
manufacturer customers, if they reduce their focus on our
products or if we are unable to obtain additional value added
reseller or original equipment manufacturer customers, our
business could suffer.
We rely on tape
technology for a substantial part of our revenues. Our business
will be harmed if demand for storage solutions using tape
technology declines or fails to develop as we expect.
We derive a high percentage of our revenues from products that
incorporate some form of tape technology. We expect to derive a
high percentage of our revenues from these products for the
foreseeable future. As a result, we will continue to be subject
to the risk of a decrease in revenues if demand for these
products declines or if rising prices make it more difficult to
obtain them. If products incorporating other technologies gain
comparable or superior market acceptance and competitive price
advantage, our business, financial condition and operating
results could be adversely and materially affected unless we
successfully develop and market products incorporating the new
technology.
19
If we fail to
develop and introduce new products on a timely and
cost-effective basis, or if our products do not contain the
features required by the marketplace, we will eventually lose
market share and sales to more innovative competitors.
The market for our products is characterized by rapidly changing
technology and evolving industry standards. The future success
of Qualstar will depend on our ability to anticipate changes in
technology, to develop new and enhanced products on a timely and
cost-effective basis, and to introduce, manufacture and achieve
market acceptance of these new and enhanced products. In
particular, our success will depend on the market acceptance of
our new XLS family of automated tape libraries. Our RLS and TLS
families of tape libraries are facing increasing competition
from products manufactured by our competitors and may face
competition from other types of storage devices that may be
developed in the future.
Development schedules for high technology products are
inherently subject to uncertainty and there can be no assurance
we will be able to meet our product development schedules or
that our development costs will be within budgeted amounts. If
the products or product enhancements developed are not
deliverable due to technical problems, quality issues or
component shortages, or if such products or product enhancements
are not accepted by the marketplace or are unreliable, then our
business, financial condition and results of operations may be
materially adversely affected.
The introduction of new storage technologies or the adoption of
an industry standard different than our current product
standards could render our existing products obsolete.
We depend upon
independent software vendors to provide management software that
makes our tape libraries functional.
The utility of an automated tape library depends upon the
storage management software, which supports the library and
integrates it into the users computing environment to
provide a complete storage solution. We do not develop and have
no control over the development of this storage management
software. Instead we rely on third party independent software
vendors to develop and support this software. Accordingly, the
continued development and future growth of the market for our
products will depend partly upon the success of software vendors
to meet the overall data storage and management needs of tape
library purchasers and our ability to maintain relationships
with these firms. Although we do not have contracts with any
third party independent software vendors, we maintain
relationships with them by:
|
|
|
|
|
supplying tape libraries so they can qualify their software to
work with our tape libraries;
|
|
|
|
evaluating their software for compatibility with our tape
libraries;
|
|
|
|
keeping them informed as to current and contemplated changes to
our products; and
|
|
|
|
referring business to them when value added resellers or end
users inquire about software sources.
|
We may have to
expend significant amounts of time and money defending or
settling product liability claims arising from failures of our
tape libraries.
Because our tape library customers use our products to store and
backup their important data, we face potential liability if our
products fail to perform. Although we maintain general liability
insurance, our insurance may not cover potential claims of this
type or may not be adequate to indemnify us for all liability
that may be imposed. Any imposition of liability that is not
covered by insurance or that exceeds our insurance coverage
could reduce our profitability or cause us to discontinue
operations.
Undetected flaws
could increase our costs, reduce our revenues and divert
resources from our core business needs.
Our tape libraries are complex. Despite our efforts to revise
and update our manufacturing and test processes to address
engineering and component changes, we may not be able to control
and eliminate
20
manufacturing flaws adequately. These flaws may include
undetected software or hardware defects associated with:
|
|
|
|
|
a newly introduced product;
|
|
|
|
a new version of an existing product; or
|
|
|
|
a product that has been integrated into a network storage
solution with the products of other vendors.
|
The variety of contexts in which errors may arise may make it
difficult to identify the source of a problem. These problems
may:
|
|
|
|
|
cause us to incur significant warranty, repair and replacement
costs;
|
|
|
|
divert the attention of our engineering personnel from our
product development efforts;
|
|
|
|
cause significant customer relations problems; or
|
|
|
|
damage our reputation.
|
To address these risks, we frequently revise and update
manufacturing and test procedures to address engineering and
component changes to our products. If we fail to adequately
monitor, develop and implement appropriate test and
manufacturing processes we could experience a rate of product
failure that results in substantial shipment delays, repair or
replacement costs or damage to our reputation. Product flaws may
also consume our limited engineering resources and interrupt our
development efforts. Significant product failures would increase
our costs and result in the loss of future sales and be harmful
to our business.
RISKS RELATED TO
OUR POWER SUPPLY BUSINESS
The principal risks applicable specifically to our power supply
operating segment are described below.
We depend on a
single contract manufacturer for the majority of our power
supplies. Loss of this supplier could harm our
business.
The primary supplier of our N2 Power power supplies is located
in China. If this manufacturer should be unable to deliver
products to us on a timely basis or at all, our power supply
business could be adversely affected. Though we have four years
of favorable experience with this supplier, there can be no
assurance that circumstances might not change and compel this
supplier to curtail or terminate deliveries to us.
Environmental
health and safety laws may restrict our operations.
We are subject to local laws and regulations in various regions
in which we sell our power supplies, including the European
Union (EU) in particular. A new EU directive may
have a material impact on our business. The Restriction of
Certain Hazardous Substances Directive (RoHS), which restricts
the distribution of certain substances, including lead, within
the EU, became effective July 1, 2006. We are in the
process of transitioning our power supply manufacturing to a
RoHS compliant process. During the transition, there is risk
that some of our inventory manufactured before the transition
may become unmarketable in the EU, resulting in inventory write
downs that could adversely affect our operating results.
Price erosion may
have a material adverse effect on our margins and
profitability.
The majority of the power supply manufactures that we compete
with have substantially more resources and more models available
than we do. Additionally the power supply business is generally
characterized by intense competition. There can be no assurances
that a competitor will not choose to use such resources to
underprice our products in the market, thereby adversely
affecting our sales or margins.
21
ITEM 1B.
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2.
PROPERTIES
Our headquarters, located in Simi Valley, California, consists
of a single building containing approximately 57,000 square
feet housing our manufacturing, sales and marketing, finance and
administration and approximately half of our engineering. Our
lease on this facility expires in February 2011, with an early
termination option becoming available in February of 2007. Rent
on this facility is $39,000 per month, with step-ups
ranging from $2,400 to $2,800 per month every two years.
We also lease approximately 4,300 square feet of office
space in Boulder, Colorado, that houses our Advanced Development
Group. The lease of the Boulder, Colorado facility expires in
2007. Subsequent to June 30, 2006, we extended the Colorado
facility lease through May 2009. Additionally, we have a sales
office in Surrey, United Kingdom.
ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are from time to time involved in various lawsuits and legal
proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. At
this time, we are not aware of any pending or threatened
litigation against us that we expect will have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity
or operating results. Legal claims are inherently uncertain,
however. We cannot assure you that we will not be adversely
affected in the future by legal proceedings.
ITEM 4.
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SHAREHOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during
the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006.
PART II
ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Qualstars common stock is quoted on The NASDAQ Stock
Market (NASDAQ Symbol QBAK). The following table
sets forth the high and low closing sale prices of our common
stock as reported by NASDAQ, during the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Date
Range
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
July 1
September, 30, 2005
|
|
$
|
4.51
|
|
|
$
|
3.55
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
October 1
December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
$
|
3.21
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
January 1
March 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
4.50
|
|
|
$
|
3.30
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
April 1
June 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
4.20
|
|
|
$
|
3.00
|
|
Fiscal 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
July 1
September, 30, 2004
|
|
$
|
6.44
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
October 1
December 31, 2004
|
|
$
|
6.94
|
|
|
$
|
4.33
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
January 1
March 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
April 1
June 30, 2005
|
|
$
|
4.55
|
|
|
$
|
3.53
|
|
There were approximately 47 owners of record of Qualstars
common stock as of September 15, 2006.
22
Qualstar has declared no cash dividends during the periods
reported. Qualstar does not currently anticipate paying cash
dividends in the foreseeable future, but intends to retain any
future earnings for reinvestment in its business. Any future
determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of
our Board of Directors and will be dependent upon
Qualstars financial condition, results of operations,
capital requirements, terms of any debt instruments then in
effect and such other factors as our Board of Directors may deem
relevant at the time.
ITEM 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data is qualified in its
entirety by and should be read in conjunction with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and the financial
statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this
10-K. Our
historical financial results are not necessarily indicative of
results to be expected for any future period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
expect per share amounts)
|
|
|
Statements of Income
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
21,731
|
|
|
$
|
25,144
|
|
|
$
|
31,530
|
|
|
$
|
33,557
|
|
|
$
|
37,631
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
14,856
|
|
|
|
16,529
|
|
|
|
19,575
|
|
|
|
21,171
|
|
|
|
23,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
6,875
|
|
|
|
8,615
|
|
|
|
11,955
|
|
|
|
12,386
|
|
|
|
13,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
3,083
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
4,268
|
|
|
|
3,994
|
|
|
|
2,136
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
3,213
|
|
|
|
3,350
|
|
|
|
3,607
|
|
|
|
3,834
|
|
|
|
3,048
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,629
|
|
|
|
3,955
|
|
|
|
5,420
|
|
|
|
4,428
|
|
|
|
5,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
9,925
|
|
|
|
11,055
|
|
|
|
13,295
|
|
|
|
12,256
|
|
|
|
10,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(3,050
|
)
|
|
|
(2,440
|
)
|
|
|
(1,340
|
)
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
3,472
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
1,269
|
|
|
|
858
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
1,133
|
|
Impairment loss for
other-than-temporary
decline in investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(1,781
|
)
|
|
|
(1,582
|
)
|
|
|
(876
|
)
|
|
|
823
|
|
|
|
4,605
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income
taxes
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
1,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,692
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,647
|
)
|
|
$
|
(731
|
)
|
|
$
|
549
|
|
|
$
|
2,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used to compute earnings
(loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
12,253
|
|
|
|
12,398
|
|
|
|
12,577
|
|
|
|
12,579
|
|
|
|
12,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
12,253
|
|
|
|
12,398
|
|
|
|
12,577
|
|
|
|
12,666
|
|
|
|
12,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
6,845
|
|
|
$
|
12,210
|
|
|
$
|
6,401
|
|
|
$
|
6,236
|
|
|
$
|
4,859
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
26,822
|
|
|
|
21,854
|
|
|
|
29,376
|
|
|
|
29,857
|
|
|
|
25,987
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
29,012
|
*
|
|
|
25,121
|
*
|
|
|
46,534
|
|
|
|
47,191
|
|
|
|
46,507
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
45,399
|
|
|
|
47,223
|
|
|
|
51,647
|
|
|
|
52,096
|
|
|
|
50,758
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
42,858
|
|
|
|
44,653
|
|
|
|
48,064
|
|
|
|
48,868
|
|
|
|
47,973
|
|
|
|
* |
In fiscal 2006 and 2005, certain marketable securities were
reclassified to long-term assets.
|
23
ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis should be read in
conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto.
OVERVIEW
We design, develop, manufacture and sell automated magnetic tape
libraries used to store, retrieve and manage electronic data
primarily in network computing environments. We offer tape
libraries for multiple tape drive technologies, including LTO,
AIT, Super AIT, and SuperDLT tape drives and media.
Many enterprises now routinely manage very large databases, in
addition to storing information on local desktop computers.
This, coupled with the growth in the amount of data from new
sources and applications, is increasing the need for managing
and storing data efficiently. Anticipating the increased demand
for tape libraries, we have developed tape libraries spanning a
broad range of tape formats, prices, capacity and performance.
We expect our products to continue to evolve in the future in
response to emerging tape technologies and changing customer
preferences.
We have developed a network of value added resellers who
specialize in delivering complete storage solutions to end
users. End users of our products range from small businesses
requiring simple automated backup solutions to large
organizations needing complex storage management solutions. We
also sell our products to original equipment manufacturers who
bundle our products with their own and sell them as part of a
complete system or solution. We assist our customers with
marketing, sales and technical support.
Our international sales efforts are currently directed from our
corporate offices in Simi Valley, California. European sales are
coordinated through our European sales office in the United
Kingdom. All of our international sales are denominated in
U.S. dollars. Revenues from sales outside North America
were approximately $5.7 million, or 26.1% of revenues in
fiscal 2006, approximately $6.9 million, or 27.3% of
revenues in fiscal 2005, and approximately $10.2 million,
or 32.4% of revenues in fiscal 2004.
We also design, develop, manufacture and sell ultra small
high-efficiency open-frame switching power supplies for original
equipment manufacturers of telecommunications equipment,
servers, routers, switches, RAIDs, and other equipment. Our
power supplies are sold under the N2Power brand name through
independent sales representatives and a private distributor. The
primary customers are original equipment manufacturers and
contract manufacturers.
Net revenues include revenues from the sale of tape libraries,
library tape drives, tape cartridges, ancillary products, and
power supplies. Ancillary revenues include service, repair, and
on-site
service agreements net of the cost of any third party service
contracts. Automated tape libraries and related products, such
as tape drives and tape media, represented approximately 66.2%
of revenues in fiscal 2006, approximately 75.1% of revenues in
fiscal 2005, and approximately 81.4% of revenues in fiscal 2004.
Sales of ancillary products and services, and power supplies
accounted for the balance of our revenues.
Gross margins depend on several factors, including the cost of
manufacturing, product mix, customer demand and the level of
competition. Larger tape libraries provide higher gross margins
than do smaller tape libraries primarily because the competition
is less intense in this market segment.
Research and development activities include the design and
development of new products, as well as enhancements to existing
products. Our engineering group is developing our next
generation of automated tape libraries, currently in transition
from the development phase to the production phase, with
manufacturing now set up in our Simi Valley facility. We expect
research and development expenses to stay approximately the same
in absolute dollars in fiscal 2007.
We expect general and administrative expenses to decrease
slightly in absolute dollars in fiscal 2007. We expect sales and
marketing expenses to increase in fiscal 2007 due to additional
expenses associated with bringing our next generation tape
libraries to market.
24
We recorded deferred compensation of approximately
$1.7 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2000,
representing the difference between the exercise price of stock
options and restricted stock granted to employees and directors
during fiscal 2000 and the deemed fair value for accounting
purposes of our common stock on the grant dates. Amortization of
deferred compensation, which was recorded as general and
administrative expense in the statement of operations, was $0 in
fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005 and approximately $140,000 in fiscal
2004. The deferred compensation related to these stock options
and restricted stock was fully amortized as of June 30,
2004.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations is based upon our financial statements,
which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principals generally accepted in the United States. The
preparation of these financial statements requires us to make
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going
basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to
customer promotional offers, sales returns, bad debts,
inventories, warranty costs, investments, and income taxes. We
base our estimates on historical experience and on various other
assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities
that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results
may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.
We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our
more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation
of our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue is recognized upon shipment of product to our customers,
less estimated returns, for which provision is made at the time
of sale. Title and risk of loss transfer to the customer when
the product leaves our dock in Simi Valley, California, or
another shipping location designated by us. In general, these
customers are allowed to return the product, free of penalty,
within thirty days of shipment, if the product does not meet the
end users requirements.
We record an allowance for estimated sales returns based on past
experience and current knowledge of our customer base. Our
experience has been such that only a very small percentage of
libraries are returned. Should our experience change, however,
we may require additional allowances for sales returns.
Allowance for
Doubtful Accounts
We estimate our allowance for doubtful accounts based on an
assessment of the collectibility of specific accounts and the
overall condition of accounts receivable. In evaluating the
adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts, we analyze
specific trade receivables, historical bad debts, customer
credits, customer credit-worthiness and changes in
customers payment terms and patterns. If the financial
condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an
impairment of their ability to make additional payments, then we
may need to make additional allowances. Likewise, if we
determine that we could realize more of our receivables in the
future than previously estimated, we would adjust the allowance
to increase income in the period we made this determination.
Inventory
Valuation
We record inventories at the lower of cost or market value. We
assess the value of our inventories periodically based upon
numerous factors including expected product or material demand,
current market conditions, technological obsolescence, current
cost and net realizable value. If necessary, we write down our
inventory for estimated obsolescence, potential shrinkage, or
unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between the cost
of inventory and the estimated market value based upon
assumptions about
25
future demand and market conditions. If technology changes more
rapidly than expected, or market conditions become less
favorable than those projected by management, additional
inventory write-downs may be required.
Warranty
Obligations
We provide for the estimated cost of product warranties at the
time revenue is recognized. We engage in extensive product
quality programs and processes, including active monitoring and
evaluation of product failure rates, material usage and
estimation of service delivery costs incurred in correcting a
product failure. However, should actual product failure rates,
material usage, or service delivery costs differ from our
estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty liability would
be required. Historically our warranty costs have not been
significant.
Share-Based
Compensation
Share-based compensation is accounted for in accordance with
SFAS 123R, Share-Based Payment. We use the
Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine fair value of
the award at the date of grant and recognize compensation
expense over the vesting period. The inputs we use for the model
require the use of judgement, estimates and assumptions
regarding the expected volatility of the stock, the expected
term the average employee will hold the option prior to the date
of exercise, and the amount of share-based awards that are
expected to be forfeited. Changes in these inputs and
assumptions could occur and actual results could differ from
these estimates, and our results of operations could be
materially impacted.
Accounting for
Income Taxes
We estimate our tax liability based on current tax laws in the
statutory jurisdictions in which we operate. These estimates
include judgments about deferred tax assets and liabilities
resulting from temporary differences between assets and
liabilities recognized for financial reporting purposes and such
amounts recognized for tax purposes, as well as about the
realization of deferred tax assets.
We maintain a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax
assets due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of
realizing the benefits of net deferred tax assets in future
years. We have considered future taxable income and ongoing
prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the
need for such a valuation allowance. In the event we were to
determine that we would be able to realize all or part of our
net deferred tax asset in the future, the valuation allowance
would be decreased accordingly.
We may periodically undergo examinations by the federal and
state regulatory authorities and the Internal Revenue Service.
We may be assessed additional taxes and or penalties contingent
on the outcome of these examinations. Our previous examinations
have not resulted in any unfavorable or significant assessments.
The Company had fiscal 2002 under audit by the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) for which the IRS issued a no change
letter in the quarter ended March 31, 2005.
26
RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
The following table reflects, as a percentage of net revenues,
statements of operations data for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
68.4
|
|
|
|
65.7
|
|
|
|
62.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
31.6
|
|
|
|
34.3
|
|
|
|
37.9
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
17.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(14.1
|
)
|
|
|
(9.7
|
)
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
Investment income
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
Impairment loss for
other-than-temporary
decline in investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before provision (benefit)
for income taxes
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
(6.3
|
)
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
Provision (benefit) for income
taxes
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(7.9
|
)%
|
|
|
(6.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues are recognized upon shipment of the product to the
customer, less estimated returns, for which provision is made at
the time of sale. The following table summarizes our revenue by
major product line:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Tape Library revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TLS
|
|
|
42.6
|
%
|
|
|
51.7
|
%
|
|
|
56.4
|
%
|
RLS
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54.8
|
|
|
|
64.8
|
|
|
|
71.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
Media
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
Power Supplies
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Upgrades, Spares, 9 Track
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006
Compared to Fiscal 2005
Net Revenues. Net revenues decreased from
$25.1 million in fiscal 2005 to $21.7 million in
fiscal 2006. The decrease of approximately $3.4 million, or
13.5% is attributed to declining unit sales of our older tape
library products in the TLS and RLS product lines, incorporating
AIT, SAIT, DLT, and LTO tape technology, in conjunction with
lower average unit selling prices, partially offset by increased
service and power supply revenue. Power supply revenue has
doubled year over year while service revenue increased by
approximately 19%.
Revenues from tape libraries and drives decreased to
$11.9 million, or 54.8% of revenues, in the year ended
June 30, 2006, from $16.3 million, or 64.8% of
revenues, in the year ended June 30, 2005. We anticipate
sales of our new enterprise-level XLS product line to
contribute to tape library revenues in fiscal 2007. We also
expect continued growth as a percentage of sales in our power
supply revenues during fiscal 2007. We expect service revenue to
remain flat as a percentage of sales in fiscal 2007.
Gross Profit. Gross profit decreased from
$8.6 million in fiscal 2005 to $6.9 million in fiscal
2006. The decrease of approximately $1.7 million, or 20.2%,
is primarily due to lower revenues resulting in lower absorption
of manufacturing overhead expenses, additional inventory
reserves and lower average selling
27
prices. We expect our gross margin percentage in the first half
of fiscal 2007 to decrease, and then increase slightly as the
XLS product line sales increase in the second half of fiscal
2007.
Research and Development. Research and
development expenses decreased from $3.8 million in fiscal
2005 to $3.1 million in fiscal 2006. The decrease of
approximately $0.7 million, or 17.8%, is due primarily to
lower salaries associated with a decrease in headcount, as our
XLS product line transitioned from the development phase to the
design verification phase, lower prototype material costs and
lower consulting fees. We anticipate research and development
expenses to remain the same in fiscal 2007.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing
expenses decreased from $3.4 million in fiscal 2005 to
$3.2 million in fiscal 2006. The decrease of approximately
$0.2 million, or 4.1%, can be attributed primarily to a
decrease in promotion and travel related expenses. We expect
sales and marketing expenses to increase in fiscal 2007 related
to the launch of our XLS product line.
General and Administrative. General and
administrative expenses decreased from $4.0 million in
fiscal 2005 to $3.6 million in fiscal 2006. The decrease of
approximately $0.4 million, or 8.2%, is due to lower legal
and bad debt expenses. We anticipate that general and
administrative expenses will remain the same in fiscal 2007.
Investment Income. Investment income increased
to $1.3 million in fiscal 2006 from $0.9 million in
fiscal 2005. The increase of $0.4 million, or 48% is due to
higher average short-term security balances combined with higher
short-term yields available during the rising interest rate
environment during fiscal 2006. We anticipate investment income
to remain flat in fiscal 2007.
Provision for Income Taxes. Provision for
income taxes decreased from $0.1 million in fiscal 2005 to
a benefit for income taxes of $0.1 million in fiscal 2006.
The decrease of $0.2 million is due to the reversal of a
reserve established in fiscal 2005 against research and
development credits that were refunded in fiscal 2006.
Fiscal 2005
Compared to Fiscal 2004
Net Revenues. Revenues for the year ended
June 30, 2005 were $25.1 million, a decrease of 20.3%
compared to net revenues of $31.5 million for the year
ended June 30, 2004.
The decrease in revenues was due primarily to a decline in the
demand for our tape libraries using 8mm AIT tape technology and
to a lesser extent, half inch tape technology. Revenues from
libraries incorporating AIT tape technology were lower due to
customer preferences shifting to the higher capacity half inch
technology tape drives, caused, in part, by the delayed
availability of AIT4 tape drives. Moreover, when AIT4 tape
drives did become available, they were not backward read-write
compatible with earlier generations of AIT tape drives. Both of
these factors negatively impacted our upgrade business in our
large AIT customer base. Revenues incorporating half inch
technology exceeded revenues incorporating 8mm technology in
absolute dollars in fiscal 2005. In fiscal 2004, by comparison,
revenues were divided about evenly between 8mm and half inch
tape technologies in absolute dollars. However, revenues from
libraries incorporating half inch technology decreased from
fiscal 2004 as the second and third quarters of fiscal 2004
benefited from a large non-recurring library order of
approximately $2.5 million.
Revenues from tape libraries and drives decreased to
$16.3 million, or 64.8% of revenues, in the year ended
June 30, 2005 from $22.7 million, or 71.9% of
revenues, in the year ended June 30, 2004. Although selling
prices of our libraries dropped during fiscal 2005, average
selling prices of libraries increased during fiscal 2005 due to
a change in product mix.
Gross Profit. Gross profit was
$8.6 million, or 34.3% of revenues, for the year ended
June 30, 2005, compared to $12.0 million, or 37.9% of
revenues, for fiscal 2004. The decrease in gross margin as a
percentage of revenues was attributed to lower manufacturing
overhead absorption due to lower revenues as well as to lower
selling prices due to greater competitive pricing pressures.
Research and Development. Research and
development expenses for the year ended June 30, 2005
decreased to $3.8 million or 14.9% of revenues as compared
to $4.3 million or 13.5% of revenues for the
28
year ended June 30, 2004. This decrease in absolute dollars
was due primarily to lower prototype material costs and
salaries, partly offset by higher consulting costs, as the next
generation of tape libraries transitions from the development
phase to the pilot production phase.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing
expenses decreased to $3.4 million, or 13.3% of revenues
for the year ended June 30, 2005, as compared to
$3.6 million, or 11.4% of revenues, for the year ended
June 30, 2004. The decrease in absolute dollars can be
attributed primarily to a reduction in advertising and outside
commission expenses.
General and Administrative. General and
administrative expenses decreased to $4.0 million, or 15.7%
of revenues for the year ended June 30, 2005 as compared to
$5.4 million, or 17.2% of revenues for the year ended
June 30, 2004. The decrease in general and administrative
expenses was due to lower legal expenses attributed to the
settlement of the Raytheon lawsuit in April 2004, lower bad debt
expense and the absence of deferred stock compensation.
Investment Income and Impairment Loss for
Other-than-Temporary
Decline in Investments. Investment income
increased to $858,000 for the year ended June 30, 2005 as
compared to net investment income of $464,000 in fiscal 2004.
The increase is attributed to lowering the average duration of
our portfolio to capture the higher short-term yields available
in the current higher interest rate environment. In addition, an
impairment loss for
other-than-temporary
decline in investments of $160,000 was recognized in fiscal 2004
earnings due to the adoption of Emerging Issues Task Force
No. 03-1.
Provision for Income Taxes. The provision for
income taxes was $65,000, or −4.1% of pre-tax loss, for
fiscal 2005 compared to a benefit of $145,000, or 16.6% of
pre-tax loss, for fiscal 2004. The provision for income taxes in
fiscal 2005 can be primarily attributed to establishing full
valuation allowances against net deferred tax assets based on
our assessment regarding the realizability of these benefits in
future years offset by the recognition of research and
development credits to be received. In fiscal 2004, the low
effective tax benefit rate was primarily attributed to
establishing valuation allowances for capital losses realized on
a tax basis in fiscal 2004 and net operating loss carryforwards.
LIQUIDITY AND
CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash used by operating activities was $0.0 million in
fiscal 2006, and cash provided by operating activities was
$0.2 million in fiscal 2005 and $0.3 million in fiscal
2004. In fiscal 2006, a breakeven in operating cash resulted
from the receipt of research and development credit refunds and
a decrease in accounts receivable, offset by a net loss for the
year. In fiscal 2005, operating cash was primarily provided by
refunds of fiscal 2002 federal and state income taxes paid and a
decrease in accounts receivable, offset partially by decreases
in accounts payable and other accrued liabilities. In fiscal
2004, operating cash was primarily provided by a refund of
fiscal 2003 income taxes paid and increases in accounts payable
and other accrued liabilities, offset partially by increases in
accounts receivable and inventories.
Cash used in investing activities was $5.3 million in
fiscal 2006, and cash provided by investing activities was
$7.3 million in fiscal 2005 and cash used in investing
activities was $15,000 in fiscal 2004. Cash used in investing
activities in fiscal 2006 related primarily to the purchase of
marketable securities and equipment partially offset by sales of
marketable securities. Cash provided by investing activities in
fiscal 2005 related primarily to sales of marketable securities
partially offset by purchases of equipment. Cash used in
investing activities in fiscal 2004 related primarily to
purchases of marketable securities as well as equipment and
leasehold improvements.
Cash used in financing activities was $0.0 million in
fiscal 2006, $1.7 million in fiscal 2005 and
$0.1 million in fiscal 2004. Cash used in financing
activities for fiscal 2005 and 2004, related primarily to
repurchasing shares of the Companys common stock.
As of June 30, 2006, we had $6.8 million in cash and
cash equivalents and $26.8 million in marketable
securities. We believe that our existing cash and cash
equivalents and funds available from the sale of our
29
marketable securities, will be sufficient to fund our working
capital and capital expenditure needs for at least the next
12 months. We may utilize cash to invest in businesses,
products or technologies that we believe are strategic. We
regularly evaluate other companies and technologies for possible
investment by us. In addition, we have made and may in the
future make investments in companies with whom we have
identified potential synergies. However, we have no present
commitments or agreements with respect to any material
acquisition of other businesses or technologies.
SUMMARY OF
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS
The following is a summary of our future payments due under
contractual obligations as of June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
June 30
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Obligations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
592
|
|
|
$
|
1,698
|
|
|
$
|
2,289
|
|
2008
|
|
|
554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
2009
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
2010
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
588
|
|
2011
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,611
|
|
|
$
|
1,698
|
|
|
$
|
4,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations in the table above represent the value of
open purchase orders as of June 30, 2006. We believe that
some of these obligations could be canceled for payment of a
nominal penalty or no penalty; however, the amount of open
purchase orders that could be canceled under such terms is
difficult to quantify.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET
ARRANGEMENTS
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
ITEM 7A.
QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
We develop products in the United States and sell them
worldwide. As a result, our financial results could be affected
by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates or
weak economic conditions in foreign markets. As all sales are
currently made in U.S. dollars, a strengthening of the
dollar could make our products less competitive in foreign
markets. Our interest income is sensitive to changes in the
general level of U.S. interest rates, particularly since
the majority of our investments are in shorter duration
securities. We have no outstanding debt nor do we utilize
derivative financial instruments. Therefore, no quantitative
tabular disclosures are required.
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
(1) Consolidated Financial
Statements
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
31
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
32
|
|
Consolidated Statements of
Operations
|
|
|
33
|
|
Consolidated Statements of
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
34
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows
|
|
|
35
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements
|
|
|
36
|
|
30
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of
Directors and Shareholders of Qualstar Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Qualstar Corporation as of June 30, 2006 and 2005, and the
related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended June 30, 2006. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an
audit of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Qualstar Corporation at June 30, 2006
and 2005, and the consolidated results of its operations and its
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
June 30, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, in
fiscal 2006 the Company changed its method of accounting for
share-based compensation.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Woodland Hills, California
September 15, 2006
31
QUALSTAR
CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
6,845
|
|
|
$
|
12,210
|
|
Marketable securities, short-term
|
|
|
14,040
|
|
|
|
3,700
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of
allowances of $118 at June 30, 2006 and $248 at
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
|
|
3,532
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
7,298
|
|
|
|
7,157
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
452
|
|
Prepaid income taxes
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
31,553
|
|
|
|
27,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
924
|
|
|
|
1,188
|
|
Marketable securities, long-term
|
|
|
12,782
|
|
|
|
18,154
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
45,399
|
|
|
$
|
47,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
783
|
|
|
$
|
763
|
|
Accrued payroll and related
liabilities
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
496
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
1,292
|
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
2,541
|
|
|
|
2,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value;
5,000 shares authorized; no shares issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value;
50,000 shares authorized, 12,253 shares issued and
outstanding as of June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005,
respectively
|
|
|
18,503
|
|
|
|
18,370
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
loss
|
|
|
(395
|
)
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
24,750
|
|
|
|
26,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
42,858
|
|
|
|
44,653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
45,399
|
|
|
$
|
47,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
32
QUALSTAR
CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands,
except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
21,731
|
|
|
$
|
25,144
|
|
|
$
|
31,530
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
14,856
|
|
|
|
16,529
|
|
|
|
19,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
6,875
|
|
|
|
8,615
|
|
|
|
11,955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
3,083
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
4,268
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
3,213
|
|
|
|
3,350
|
|
|
|
3,607
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,629
|
|
|
|
3,955
|
|
|
|
5,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
9,925
|
|
|
|
11,055
|
|
|
|
13,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(3,050
|
)
|
|
|
(2,440
|
)
|
|
|
(1,340
|
)
|
Investment income
|
|
|
1,269
|
|
|
|
858
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
Impairment loss for
other-than-temporary
decline in investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(1,781
|
)
|
|
|
(1,582
|
)
|
|
|
(876
|
)
|
Provision (benefit) for income
taxes
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss
|
|
$
|
(1,692
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,647
|
)
|
|
$
|
(731
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used to compute loss per
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
12,253
|
|
|
|
12,398
|
|
|
|
12,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
12,253
|
|
|
|
12,398
|
|
|
|
12,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
33
QUALSTAR
CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balances at June 30, 2003
|
|
|
12,640
|
|
|
$
|
20,366
|
|
|
$
|
(140
|
)
|
|
$
|
(156
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22
|
)
|
|
$
|
28,820
|
|
|
$
|
48,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Retirement of shares pursuant to
stock repurchase
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(314
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(314
|
)
|
Amortization of deferred
compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
Accrued interest on
directors notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Principal and interest payments on
directors notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(731
|
)
|
|
|
(731
|
)
|
Change in unrealized gains
(losses) on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
Impairment loss for
other-than-
temporary decline in investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(810
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at June 30, 2004
|
|
|
12,596
|
|
|
$
|
20,121
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(45
|
)
|
|
$
|
(101
|
)
|
|
$
|
28,089
|
|
|
$
|
48,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
Retirement of shares pursuant to
stock repurchase
|
|
|
(359
|
)
|
|
|
(1,827
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,827
|
)
|
Principal and interest payments on
directors notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,647
|
)
|
|
|
(1,647
|
)
|
Change in unrealized gains
(losses) on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,705
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at June 30, 2005
|
|
|
12,253
|
|
|
$
|
18,370
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(159
|
)
|
|
$
|
26,442
|
|
|
$
|
44,653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,692
|
)
|
|
|
(1,692
|
)
|
Change in unrealized gains
(losses) on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(236
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(236
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,928
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at June 30, 2006
|
|
|
12,253
|
|
|
$
|
18,503
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(395
|
)
|
|
$
|
24,750
|
|
|
$
|
42,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
34
QUALSTAR
CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(1,692
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,647
|
)
|
|
$
|
(731
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss
to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
454
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
423
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
Provision for (recovery of) bad
debts and returns
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred
compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
Impairment loss for
other-than-temporary
decline in investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
Accrued interest on
directors notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Gain on sale of securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
863
|
|
|
|
1,058
|
|
|
|
(279
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
(327
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(222
|
)
|
Prepaid income taxes and income
taxes payable
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(408
|
)
|
|
|
35
|
|
Accrued payroll and related
liabilities
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
68
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of equipment and
leasehold improvements
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
(164
|
)
|
|
|
(257
|
)
|
Purchases of marketable securities
|
|
|
(13,204
|
)
|
|
|
(22,277
|
)
|
|
|
(41,123
|
)
|
Proceeds from the sale of
marketable securities
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
29,752
|
|
|
|
41,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities
|
|
|
(5,346
|
)
|
|
|
7,311
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal and interest payments on
directors notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock
options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,827
|
)
|
|
|
(314
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,706
|
)
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(5,365
|
)
|
|
|
5,809
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,
BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
|
|
12,210
|
|
|
|
6,401
|
|
|
|
6,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF
PERIOD
|
|
$
|
6,845
|
|
|
$
|
12,210
|
|
|
$
|
6,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
35
QUALSTAR
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1
Accounting Policies
Business
Qualstar Corporation (Qualstar) was incorporated in
California in 1984 to develop and manufacture IBM compatible
9-track
reel-to-reel
tape drives for the personal computer and workstation
marketplaces. Since 1995, Qualstar has focused its efforts on
designing, developing, manufacturing and selling automated
magnetic tape libraries used to store, retrieve and manage
electronic data primarily in the network computing environment.
Tape libraries consist of cartridge tape drives, tape cartridges
and robotics to move the tape cartridges from their storage
locations to the tape drives under software control.
Qualstars libraries provide storage solutions for
organizations requiring backup, recovery, and archival storage
of critical electronic information. Qualstars tape
libraries are compatible with commonly used operating systems,
including UNIX, Windows and Linux and a wide range of storage
management software. Qualstar offers tape libraries for multiple
tape drive technologies, including those using LTO, AIT, Super
AIT, and SuperDLT.
In July 2002, Qualstar purchased the assets of N2Power,
Incorporated, a supplier of ultra small high efficiency open
frame switching power supplies. Power supplies are sold with the
N2Power brand name as well as under a private label brand name
to original equipment manufacturers. In addition, they are
utilized in Qualstars tape library products.
Accounting
Principles
The financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
Principles of
Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts and
operations of Qualstar and its wholly owned subsidiary. All
significant intercompany accounts have been eliminated.
Estimates and
Assumptions
Preparing financial statements requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. Examples include
estimates of loss contingencies, product life cycles and
inventory obsolescence, bad debts, sales returns, stock-based
compensation forfeiture rates; the potential outcome of future
tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our
financial statements or tax returns; and determining when
investment impairments are
other-than-temporary.
Actual results and outcomes may differ from managements
estimates and assumptions.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable,
and collectibility is reasonably assured (less estimated
returns, for which provisions are made at the time of sale) in
accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 104,
Revenue Recognition. The provision for estimated returns
is made based on known claims and estimates of additional
returns based on historical data. Revenues from technical
support services and other services are recognized at the time
the services are performed. Revenues from service contracts
entered into with third party service providers are recognized
at the time of sale, net of costs.
36
QUALSTAR
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Cash and Cash
Equivalents
Qualstar classifies as cash equivalents only cash and those
investments that are highly liquid, interest earning investments
with a maturity of three months or less from the date of
purchase.
Marketable
Securities
Marketable securities consist primarily of high-quality
U.S. corporate securities and U.S. federal government
debt securities. Our marketable securities portfolio consists of
short-term securities with original maturities of greater than
three months from the date of purchase and remaining maturities
of less than one year and longer term securities with original
maturities of greater than one year and less than five years.
Marketable securities are classified as available for sale and
are recorded at market value using the specific identification
method; unrealized gains and losses (excluding
other-than-temporary
impairments) are reflected in other comprehensive income until
realized; realized gains and losses are included in earnings
when the underlying securities are sold and are derived using
the specific identification method for determining the cost of
securities sold. No significant gains or losses from the sale of
marketable securities were recorded in fiscal years 2006 and
2005. All of Qualstars marketable securities were
classified as
available-for-sale
at June 30, 2006 and 2005.
On March 31, 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
reached a consensus on Issue
No. 03-1,
The Meaning of
Other-Than-Temporary
Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments,
(EIFT 03-1)
effective for annual financial statements with fiscal years
ending after June 15, 2004.
EITF 03-1
provides guidance for determining when an investment is
other-than-temporarily
impaired, and states that an investment is considered
other-than-temporarily
impaired when its fair value is less than its amortized cost
basis and is deemed other than temporary. The application of
EITF 03-1
to the Companys marketable securities portfolio resulted
in the identification of an
other-than-temporarily
impaired investment as of June 30, 2004. In accordance with
EITF 03-1,
the Company recognized an impairment loss for
other-than-temporary
decline in investments of $160,000 in earnings equal to the
difference between the amortized cost basis and its fair value
as of June 30, 2004.
Concentration of
Credit Risk, Other Concentration Risks and Significant
Customers
Qualstar sells its products primarily through a variety of
market channels including original equipment manufacturers (OEM)
and value added resellers (VAR) located worldwide. Ongoing
credit evaluations of customers financial condition are
performed by Qualstar, and generally, collateral is not
required. Potential uncollectible accounts have been provided
for in the financial statements.
Sales outside of North America represented approximately 26.1%
of net revenues in fiscal 2006, approximately 27.3% of net
revenues in fiscal 2005 and approximately 32.4% of net revenues
in fiscal 2004. Revenues from Qualstars two largest
customers combined were approximately 13.4%, 13.9%, and 14.6%
for the years ended June 30, 2006, 2005, and 2004,
respectively. At June 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the two
largest customers accounts receivable, net of specific
allowances, totaled approximately 20.8%, 18.7% and 22.4% of net
accounts receivable, respectively.
Suppliers
Sales and costs of goods sold related to tape library products
purchased from one supplier totaled approximately 36.4% and
34.1%in fiscal 2006, 47.8% and 41.0% in fiscal 2005, and 51.1%
and 41.3% in fiscal 2004, respectively, of total sales and cost
of goods sold.
The primary supplier of our N2 Power power supplies is located
in China. If this manufacturer should be unable to deliver
products to us in a timely basis or at all, our power supply
business could be adversely
37
QUALSTAR
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
affected. Though we have four years of favorable experience with
this supplier, there can be no assurance that circumstances
might not change and compel this supplier to curtail or
terminate deliveries to us.
Allowance for
Doubtful Accounts
The allowance for doubtful accounts reflects our best estimate
of probable losses inherent in the accounts receivable balance.
We determine the allowance based on known troubled accounts,
historical experience, and other currently available evidence.
Activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
to Costs
|
|
|
Charged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
Beginning of
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
to Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of
|
|
Description
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Accounts
|
|
|
Deductions(1)
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
248,000
|
|
|
$
|
(31,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(167,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
Year Ended June 30, 2005
|
|
$
|
217,000
|
|
|
$
|
38,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(7,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
248,000
|
|
Year Ended June 30, 2004
|
|
$
|
260,000
|
|
|
$
|
186,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(229,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
217,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries. |
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost
(first-in,
first-out basis) or market. Cost includes materials, labor, and
manufacturing overhead related to the purchase and production of
inventories. We regularly review inventory quantities on hand,
future purchase commitments with our suppliers, and the
estimated utility of our inventory. If our review indicates a
reduction in utility below carrying value, we reduce our
inventory to a new cost basis.
Property and
Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation
expense is computed using the straight-line method. Leasehold
improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the estimated
useful life of the asset or the term of the lease. Estimated
useful lives are as follows:
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
5-7 years
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
5-7 years
|
Computer equipment
|
|
3-5 years
|
Expenditures for normal maintenance and repair are charged to
expense as incurred, and improvements are capitalized. Upon the
sale or retirement of property or equipment, the asset cost and
related accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective
accounts and any gain or loss is included in the results of
operations.
Long-Lived
Assets
Qualstar reviews the impairment of long-lived assets whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount
of any asset may not be recoverable, in accordance with The
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets. An impairment loss would be recognized when the
estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from
the use of the asset and its eventual disposition is less than
the carrying amount. If an impairment is indicated, the amount
of the loss to be recorded is based upon an estimate of the
difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the
asset. Fair value is based upon discounted cash flows expected
to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition
and other
38
QUALSTAR
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
valuation methods. There were no impairment losses of long-lived
assets recognized during the periods presented.
Shipping and
Handling Costs
Qualstar generally records all charges for outbound shipping and
handling as revenue. All inbound shipping and fulfillment costs
are classified as costs of goods sold.
Warranty
Obligations
Qualstar provides a three year warranty period on its tape
libraries. Some TLS and all RLS models have three year advance
replacement warranty coverage that provides for replacement of
components, or if necessary, complete libraries. All other TLS
models have a one year advance replacement warranty with the
second and third year being
return-to-factory
for service at no charge. A provision for costs related to
warranty expense is recorded when revenue is recognized, which
is estimated based on historical warranty costs incurred.
Customers may purchase extended advance replacement service
coverage and
on-site
service if they are located in the United States, Canada and
most countries within Europe.
In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45),
Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements
for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of the
Indebtedness of Others, which clarifies the requirements
of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, relating
to a guarantors accounting for and disclosures for certain
guarantees. FIN 45 requires enhanced disclosures, among
other things, for certain guarantees, including warranty
accruals. Qualstar does not issue third party guarantees, as
defined, and therefore only the disclosure provisions of
FIN 45 apply. Qualstar adopted FIN 45 for the year
ended June 30, 2003, and the adoption has had no impact on
Qualstars financial position or results of operations.
Accrued warranty obligations were $173,000 and $133,000 as of
June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Additional
disclosures have not been provided as the Companys
warranty accrual and warranty expense is not material in any of
the periods presented.
Research and
Development
All research and development costs are charged to expense as
incurred. These costs consist primarily of engineering salaries,
benefits, outside consultant fees, purchased parts and supplies
directly involved in the design and development of new products,
and facilities and other internal costs.
Advertising
Advertising and promotion expenses include costs associated with
direct and indirect marketing, trade shows and public relations.
Qualstar expenses all costs of advertising and promotion as
incurred. Advertising and promotion expenses for the years ended
June 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were approximately $407,000,
$520,000, and $601,000, respectively.
Fair Value of
Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets for cash and
cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable
approximate their fair values due to the short term nature of
these financial instruments.
Change in
Accounting Principle and Share-Based Compensation
Effective July 1, 2005, we adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 123(R),
share-based payment, using the modified prospective application
transition method. The adoption of
39
QUALSTAR
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
SFAS No. 123(R) had the impact of increasing our loss
from operations, loss before income taxes, and net loss by
$133,000, (or $ (0.01) per basic and diluted loss per
share) in fiscal 2006, and the amounts recognized as stock based
compensation expense are similar to the amounts reported
historically in the Companys footnotes under the pro forma
disclosure provisions of SFAS 123.
In accordance with SFAS 123, the Company previously
measured employee stock option related compensation expense
using the minimum value method for grants prior to the
Companys initial public offering and the Black-Scholes
method afterward for determining the weighted average fair value
of options granted. For the fiscal years ended June 30,
2005 and 2004, had employee stock option related compensation
expense been determined based on the Black Scholes method, the
Companys net loss and loss per share would have been
increased to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net loss as reported
|
|
$
|
(1,647
|
)
|
|
$
|
(731
|
)
|
Stock-based employee compensation
cost included in reported net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
Pro forma stock-based employee
compensation cost under SFAS 123
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
(505
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss
|
|
$
|
(1,765
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,096
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic pro forma
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted as reported
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted pro forma
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value
of the options is amortized over the options vesting
periods. The pro forma effect on net income or loss for 2005 and
2004 is not representative of the pro forma effect on net income
or loss in future years because compensation expense in future
years may reflect the amortization of a larger number of stock
options granted in several succeeding years.
In computing the pro forma compensation expense under
SFAS 123, a weighted-average fair value of $1.27 for 2005,
and $3.59 for 2004 stock option grants was estimated at the date
of grant using the minimum value option pricing model before
Qualstars initial public offering and the Black Scholes
model afterward with the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.8%
|
|
|
|
2.9%
|
|
Expected life of options
|
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
|
4 years
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
36.9%
|
|
|
|
100.8%
|
|
Income
Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for using the liability method in
accordance with SFAS 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and
assets are recognized for the expected future tax consequences
of temporary differences between the financial statement and tax
bases of assets and liabilities, and for the expected future tax
benefit to be derived from tax credits and loss carryforwards.
Current income tax expense or benefit represents the amount of
income taxes expected to be payable or refundable for the
current year. A valuation allowance is established when, in the
opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some
portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
40
QUALSTAR
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) is accounted for according to
SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive
Income (SFAS 130). Comprehensive income (loss)
includes unrealized gains and losses on debt and equity
securities classified as
available-for-sale
and included as a component of shareholders equity.
Loss per
Share
Qualstar calculates earnings (loss) per share in accordance with
SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share. Basic
earnings per share has been computed by dividing net loss by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted
loss per share has been computed by dividing net loss by the
weighted average common shares outstanding plus dilutive
securities or other contracts to issue common stock as if these
securities were exercised or converted to common stock.
The following table sets forth the calculation for basic and
diluted loss per share for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
Loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(1,692
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,647
|
)
|
|
$
|
(731
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares for basic
loss per share
|
|
|
12,253
|
|
|
|
12,398
|
|
|
|
12,577
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares for
diluted loss per share
|
|
|
12,253
|
|
|
|
12,398
|
|
|
|
12,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issuable under stock options of 557,000, 455,000 and
511,000 for the years ended June 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively, have been excluded from the computation of diluted
loss per share because the effect would be antidilutive.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to
the current year presentation.
Note 2
Marketable Securities
The following table summarizes marketable securities by security
type at June 30, 2006, and June 30, 2005, respectively
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
June 30,
2006
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
US Treasury obligations and direct
obligations of U.S. Government agencies
|
|
$
|
16,318
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(229
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,089
|
|
Government Sponsored Enterprise
collateralized mortgage obligations
|
|
|
3,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
3,411
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
7,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
7,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
27,217
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(395
|
)
|
|
$
|
26,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
QUALSTAR
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
June 30,
2005
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
US Treasury obligations and direct
obligations of U.S. Government agencies
|
|
$
|
12,703
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(85
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,618
|
|
Government Sponsored Enterprise
collateralized mortgage obligations
|
|
|
2,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
2,472
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
5,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
5,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
21,011
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(159
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables show the gross unrealized losses and fair
value of the Companys investments with unrealized losses
that are not deemed to be
other-than-temporarily
impaired, aggregated by investment category and length of time
that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized
loss position, at June 30, 2006, and June 30, 2005,
respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12
Months
|
|
|
12 Months or
Greater
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
June 30,
2006
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
US Treasury obligations and direct
obligations of U.S. Government agencies
|
|
$
|
4,599
|
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,490
|
|
|
$
|
(211
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,089
|
|
|
$
|
(229
|
)
|
Government Sponsored Enterprise
collateralized mortgage obligations
|
|
|
1,757
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
1,654
|
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
3,411
|
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
3,340
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
3,982
|
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
7,322
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
9,696
|
|
|
$
|
(33
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,126
|
|
|
$
|
(362
|
)
|
|
$
|
26,822
|
|
|
$
|
(395
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12
Months
|
|
|
12 Months or
Greater
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
June 30,
2005
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
US Treasury obligations and direct
obligations of U.S. Government agencies
|
|
$
|
3,973
|
|
|
$
|
(27
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,645
|
|
|
$
|
(58
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,618
|
|
|
$
|
(85
|
)
|
Government Sponsored Enterprise
collateralized mortgage obligations
|
|
|
934
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
2,472
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
4,054
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
1,708
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
5,762
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
8,961
|
|
|
$
|
(71
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,891
|
|
|
$
|
(88
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,852
|
|
|
$
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury Obligations. The unrealized
losses on the Companys investments in U.S. Treasury
obligations and direct obligations of U.S. Government
agencies were caused by interest rate increases. The contractual
terms of these investments do not permit the issuer to settle
the securities at a price less than the amortized cost of the
investment. Because the Company has the ability and intent to
hold these investments until a recovery of fair value, which may
be maturity, the Company does not consider these investments to
be
other-than-temporarily
impaired at June 30, 2006.
Government Sponsored Enterprise (GSE) Collateralized Mortgage
Obligations. Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae are
identified as GSEs. The unrealized losses on the Companys
investment in GSE collateralized mortgage obligations were
caused by interest rate increases. The cash flows of these
investments are guaranteed by the GSE. Because the decline in
market value is attributable to changes in interest rates and
not credit quality and because the Company has the ability and
intent to hold these
42
QUALSTAR
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
investments until a recovery of fair value, which may be
maturity, the Company does not consider these investments to be
other-than-temporarily
impaired at June 30, 2006.
Corporate Bonds. The unrealized losses on the
Companys investments in corporate bonds were caused by
interest rate increases. The contractual terms of these
investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at
a price less than the amortized cost of the investment. Because
the Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments
until a recovery of fair value, which may be maturity, the
Company does not consider these investments to be
other-than-temporarily
impaired at June 30, 2006.
The following tables summarize the contractual maturities of the
Companys fixed maturity securities (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Less than 90 days
|
|
$
|
1,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than one year
|
|
|
12,483
|
|
|
$
|
3,700
|
|
Due in one to two years
|
|
|
5,990
|
|
|
|
9,692
|
|
Due in two to five years
|
|
|
6,792
|
|
|
|
8,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,822
|
|
|
$
|
21,854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 3
Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
Raw materials, (net)
|
|
$
|
6,473
|
|
|
$
|
6,196
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
825
|
|
|
|
961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,298
|
|
|
$
|
7,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 4
Property and Equipment
The components of property and equipment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
$
|
546
|
|
|
$
|
546
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
1,006
|
|
|
|
994
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
2,416
|
|
|
|
2,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,968
|
|
|
|
3,860
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
(3,044
|
)
|
|
|
(2,672
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
924
|
|
|
$
|
1,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
QUALSTAR
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 5
Income Taxes
The provision (benefit) for income taxes is comprised of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
(86
|
)
|
|
$
|
(156
|
)
|
|
$
|
(451
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(215
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
(371
|
)
|
|
|
(457
|
)
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
State
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(89
|
)
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a reconciliation of the statutory federal
income tax rate to Qualstars effective income tax rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Statutory federal income tax
benefit
|
|
|
(34.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(34.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(34.0
|
)%
|
State income taxes, net of federal
income tax benefit
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
Non-taxable investment income
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
|
(16.0
|
)
|
Research and development credits
|
|
|
(6.5
|
)
|
|
|
(15.5
|
)
|
|
|
(22.8
|
)
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
36.7
|
|
|
|
60.9
|
|
|
|
55.2
|
|
Amortization of deferred
compensation
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)%
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
(16.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tax effect of temporary differences resulted in deferred
income tax assets (liabilities) as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
1,030
|
|
|
$
|
610
|
|
Capital loss and other credit
carryforwards
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
501
|
|
Research and development credit
carryforwards
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
Allowance for bad debts and returns
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
Inventory reserves
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
Capitalized inventory costs
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Other accruals
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
2,871
|
|
|
|
2,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and other
|
|
|
(215
|
)
|
|
|
(215
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax
liabilities
|
|
|
(215
|
)
|
|
|
(215
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(2,656
|
)
|
|
|
(2,007
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
QUALSTAR
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company placed a valuation allowance on net deferred tax
assets during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
based on the Companys assessment regarding the
realizability of such assets in future years. The Company has
net operating losses, capital losses, research and development
credit and other carryforwards for tax purposes of $1,911 at
June 30, 2006 and $1,582 at June 30, 2005 expiring
between fiscal years 2009 and 2025, except for the state
research and development credit, which has no limit on the
carryforward period.
Note 6
Preferred Stock
Qualstars capital structure allows for the Board of
Directors to authorize 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock.
The Board of Directors has authority to fix the rights,
preferences, privileges and restrictions, including voting
rights, of these shares of preferred stock without any future
vote or action by the shareholders. At June 30, 2006 and
2005, there were no outstanding shares of preferred stock.
Note 7
Shared Based Stock Option Plans
The Company has one share-based compensation plan as described
below. During fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company recorded
share-based compensation associated with outstanding stock
option grants of approximately $133,000, $0 and $0,
respectively. No income tax benefit was recognized in the income
statement for share-based arrangements in any period presented.
Qualstar adopted a stock option plan (1998 Stock Incentive Plan)
under which incentive and nonqualified stock options could be
granted for an aggregate of no more than 1,215,000 shares
of common stock. Under the terms of the plan, options could be
issued at an exercise price of not less than 100% of the fair
market value of common stock on the date of grant. If an
incentive stock option is granted to an individual owning more
than 10% of the total combined voting power of all stock, the
exercise price of the option may not be less than 110% of the
fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant.
These option awards typically vest based on 4 years of
continuous service at a rate of 25% per year and terminate
as specified in each option agreement, but terminate no later
than ten years after the date of grant.
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model that uses
the assumptions noted in the following table. Expected
volatilities are based on historical volatility of the
Companys stock. The Company uses historical data to
estimate option exercise and employee termination in determining
forfeiture rates and evaluates separate groups of employees by
functional area that have similar historical exercise behavior.
The expected term of options granted is estimated based on the
vesting term of the award, historical employee exercise
behavior, expected volatility of the Companys stock and an
employees average length of service. The risk-free
interest rate used in this model correlates to a
U.S. constant rate Treasury security with a contractual
life that approximates the expected term of the option award.
Weighted-average numbers have been used below as indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.8%
|
|
|
|
3.8%
|
|
|
|
2.9%
|
|
Expected life of options
|
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
|
4 years
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
30.8%
|
|
|
|
36.9%
|
|
|
|
100.8%
|
|
45
QUALSTAR
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes all stock option activity (in
thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
Options
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Contractual
Term
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2005
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
$
|
4.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
3.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
4.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2006
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
$
|
4.36
|
|
|
|
7.39
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2006
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
$
|
5.06
|
|
|
|
5.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted
during the fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $0.96, $1.27,
and $3.59, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options
exercised for fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $0, $11,000
and $43,000, respectively.
A summary of the status of the Companys nonvested shares
at June 30, 2006 and changes during the year are presented
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Nonvested
Shares
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Nonvested at June 30, 2005
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
$
|
1.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
0.96
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
1.87
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
2.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at June 30, 2006
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
$
|
1.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2006, there was $267,000 of total unrecognized
compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation
arrangements granted under the Plan. The cost is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.1 years. The
total fair value of shares vested for fiscal years 2006, 2005
and 2004, was $156,000, $188,000 and $490,000, respectively.
Restricted
Shares
On January 14, 2000, each of Qualstars four
non-employee directors were granted and purchased
54,000 shares of restricted stock pursuant to the 1998
Stock Incentive Plan at a price of $2.78 per share. Each
director paid for the shares with a promissory note in the
amount of $150,000 secured by the purchased shares. Interest on
the notes accrued at the rate of 6.21% and was payable annually.
Payments of principal on the notes were due in four equal annual
installments beginning in January 2002. Qualstar, solely at its
discretion, had the right to repurchase each directors
restricted shares at the original purchase price upon
termination of service for any reason. Qualstars
repurchase right lapsed and the shares vested ratably over four
years based upon each year of service as a director. All of
these shares were fully vested as of January 14, 2004.
Upon issuance of the restricted stock and granting of stock
options in January 2000, Qualstar recorded a deferred
compensation charge of $1.7 million related to both stock
options and restricted stock for the difference between the
exercise price and the deemed fair market value for accounting
purposes on the date of the grant. The deferred compensation
recorded was amortized over a four-year vesting period, which
resulted in compensation expense of $140,000 in fiscal 2004,
$301,000 in fiscal 2003, and $430,000 in fiscal 2002. During the
year ended June 30, 2003, approximately 52,000 of unvested
stock options related to these grants were forfeited. The
forfeitures resulted in a decrease in common stock
paid-in-capital
and deferred compensation of $190,000 during the year ended
June 30, 2003.
46
QUALSTAR
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 8
Purchase of N2 Power
On July 11, 2002, Qualstar acquired the assets and
intellectual properties of N2Power, Incorporated, a privately
held company which designed and produced small and efficient
open-frame switching power supplies. The consideration for this
acquisition amounted to $250,000 plus acquisition expenses of
$38,000. The purchase price was primarily allocated to a patent,
in the amount of $240,000, which is being amortized over
5 years. At June 30, 2006, accumulated amortization of
the patent was $192,000. Amortization expense for the years
ended June 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $48,000 in each
year. Amortization expense is estimated to be $48,000 in fiscal
year 2007.
Note 9
Commitments
Qualstars lease agreement for its facility located in Simi
Valley, California, expires in February of 2011, with an early
termination option becoming available in February of 2007. The
annual rent for the lease is $468,000, with step-ups ranging
from $28,000 to $34,000 every two years. The Company provides
for rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Qualstars lease agreement for its facility located in
Boulder, Colorado, expires in May of 2007. The annual rent for
the lease is $55,000, with a nominal
step-up of
approximately 2% annually. Subsequent to June 30, 2006, we
extended the Colorado facility lease through May 2009.
Future minimum lease payments under these leases are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
Year
Ending
|
|
Lease
Payment
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
592,000
|
|
2008
|
|
|
554,000
|
|
2009
|
|
|
570,000
|
|
2010
|
|
|
588,000
|
|
2011
|
|
|
307,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,611,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense (including equipment rental) for the years ended
June 30, 2006, 2005, and 2004, was $670,000, $671,000, and
$679,000, respectively.
Note 10
Segment Information
Based on the provisions of SFAS No. 131,
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information and the manner in which the Chief Operating
Decision Maker analyzes the business, Qualstar has determined
that it has two separate operating segments.
Segment revenue, loss before taxes and total assets were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
June 30
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tape Libraries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
16,008
|
|
|
|
21,231
|
|
|
|
28,573
|
|
Service
|
|
|
3,144
|
|
|
|
2,638
|
|
|
|
2,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Tape Libraries
|
|
|
19,152
|
|
|
|
23,869
|
|
|
|
30,959
|
|
Power Supplies
|
|
|
2,579
|
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Revenue
|
|
|
21,731
|
|
|
|
25,144
|
|
|
|
31,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
QUALSTAR
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
June 30
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Loss
before Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tape Libraries
|
|
|
(1,434
|
)
|
|
|
(1,427
|
)
|
|
|
(556
|
)
|
Power Supplies
|
|
|
(347
|
)
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
(320
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Loss before Taxes
|
|
|
(1,781
|
)
|
|
|
(1,582
|
)
|
|
|
(876
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
June 30
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tape Libraries
|
|
|
44,312
|
|
|
|
46,317
|
|
|
|
51,239
|
|
Power Supplies
|
|
|
1,087
|
|
|
|
906
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Assets
|
|
|
45,399
|
|
|
|
47,223
|
|
|
|
51,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information, establishes standards
for reporting information about operating segments. This
standard requires segmentation based on our internal
organization and reporting of revenue and operating income based
upon internal accounting methods. Operating segments are defined
as components of an enterprise about which separate financial
information is available that is evaluated regularly by the
chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate
resources and in assessing performance. Our chief operating
decision maker is our Chief Executive Officer. Our two segments
are Tape Libraries and Power Supplies. The two segments
discussed in this analysis are presented the way we internally
managed and monitored performance in fiscal years 2006, 2005,
and 2004. Our financial reporting systems present various data
for management to operate the business, including internal
profit and loss statements prepared on a basis consistent with
U.S. GAAP. Fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004 amounts do not
reflect allocations for certain internal resources, pension
expense, legal expense, accounting fees, and other items.
However, this represented the measurement data used by the chief
operating decision maker in evaluating performance. The tape
library business has dominated our operations, thus, our
operations and reporting have been set up to accommodate a
single segment and attribute all revenues and expenses to the
tape library side, with the power supply business being an
ancillary part of overall operations. As the power supply
segment grew in the last year to represent greater than 10% of
combined revenues, the framework for internal resource
allocations will be implemented in fiscal 2007.
The types of products and services provided by each segment are
summarized below:
Tape Libraries We design, develop,
manufacture and sell automated magnetic tape libraries used to
store, retrieve and manage electronic data primarily in network
computing environments. Tape libraries consist of cartridge tape
drives, tape cartridges and robotics to move the cartridges from
their storage locations to the tape drives under software
control. Our tape libraries provide data storage solutions for
organizations requiring backup, recovery and archival storage of
critical data.
Power Supplies We design, manufacture, and
sell ultra small, open frame, high efficiency switching power
supplies. These power supplies are used to convert AC line
voltage to DC for use in a wide variety of electronic equipment
such as telecommunications equipment, machine tools, routers,
switches, wireless systems and gaming devices.
Certain assets are tracked separately by the power supplies
segment, and all others are recorded in the tape library segment
for internal reporting presentations. Cash is not segregated
between the two segments, but retained by the library segment.
48
QUALSTAR
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Geographic
Information
Information regarding revenues attributable to the
Qualstars primary geographic operating regions is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
16,051
|
|
|
$
|
18,281
|
|
|
$
|
21,312
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
3,467
|
|
|
|
4,933
|
|
|
|
4,842
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
1,610
|
|
|
|
1,264
|
|
|
|
4,279
|
|
Other
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
|
666
|
|
|
|
1,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,732
|
|
|
$
|
25,144
|
|
|
$
|
31,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The geographic classification of revenues is based upon the
location to which the product is shipped. Qualstar does not have
any significant long-lived assets outside of the United States.
Note 11
Legal Proceedings
On January 10, 2003, Raytheon Company
(Raytheon) filed a complaint in the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging that
Qualstar and eight other named defendants infringed on a patent
owned by Raytheon entitled Mass Data Storage
Library. Raytheon filed an amended complaint on or about
February 6, 2003, which included an allegation that
Qualstars tape libraries infringe Raytheons patent.
On April 2, 2004, Raytheon and Qualstar entered into a
written settlement agreement pursuant to which all claims
between the parties alleged in the litigation were dismissed
with prejudice. The costs to settle this dispute have been
included in our results of operations in general and
administrative expenses in the year ended June 30, 2004 and
have not had a material adverse effect on our financial position.
We are from time to time involved in various lawsuits and legal
proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. At
this time, we are not aware of any pending or threatened
litigation against us that we expect will have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity
or operating results. Legal claims are inherently uncertain,
however. We cannot assure you that we will not be adversely
affected in the future by legal proceedings.
Note 12
Benefit Plans
Qualstar has a voluntary deferred compensation plan (the Plan)
qualifying for treatment under Internal Revenue Code
Section 401(k). All employees are eligible to participate
in the Plan following three months of service of employment and
may contribute up to 100% of their compensation on a pre-tax
basis, not to exceed the annual IRS maximum. Qualstar, at the
discretion of management, may make matching contributions in an
amount equal to 25% of the first 6% of compensation contributed
by eligible participants. Qualstars contributions under
the Plan totaled $59,000, $67,000, and $76,000 for the years
ended June 30, 2006, 2005, and 2004 respectively.
Note 13
Related Party Transactions
Qualstars outside counsel is a member of its board of
directors. During the years ended June 30, 2006, 2005, and
2004 Qualstar paid $94,000, $105,000, and $131,000, respectively
to the law firm in which the director is a shareholder for
general business purposes.
49
QUALSTAR
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 14
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Financial
Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes in June 2006. FIN 48
prescribes a recognition and measurement threshold for tax
positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return and
relates to the uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the
financial statements in accordance with FAS 109, Accounting
for Income Taxes. FIN 48 is effective for the first fiscal
year beginning after December 15, 2006, thus, we expect to
adopt it in our fiscal year beginning July 1, 2007. Due to
our loss position, we do not expect the adoption of FIN 48
to have a material impact on our financial statements.
Note 15
Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
4,888
|
|
|
$
|
5,052
|
|
|
$
|
5,689
|
|
|
$
|
6,102
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,603
|
|
|
|
1,446
|
|
|
|
1,922
|
|
|
|
1,904
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(694
|
)
|
|
|
(598
|
)
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
Net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
Fiscal 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
6,706
|
|
|
$
|
5,742
|
|
|
$
|
6,392
|
|
|
$
|
6,305
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,110
|
|
|
|
1,861
|
|
|
|
2,311
|
|
|
|
2,333
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(429
|
)
|
|
|
(635
|
)
|
|
|
(347
|
)
|
|
|
(236
|
)
|
Net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
50
ITEM 9. CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of Qualstars disclosure controls and
procedures as of June 30, 2006, pursuant to
Rule 13a-15
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon that
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
are effective to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the Commissions rules
and forms, and to ensure that the information required to be
disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the
Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
We did not make any changes in our internal control over
financial reporting during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006
that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER
INFORMATION
None.
51
PART III
The information called for by Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and
14 of Part III of
Form 10-K
(except information as to Qualstars executive officers,
which is included under Part I, Item 1 of this Report)
will be included in Qualstars Proxy Statement which
management intends to file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission within 120 days after the close of its fiscal
year ended June 30, 2006, and is hereby incorporated by
reference to such Proxy Statement.
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS
AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
A list of our executive officers and biographical information
appears in Part I, Item 1 of this report. Information
about our Directors may be found under the caption
Election of Directors of our Proxy Statement (the
Proxy Statement). That information is incorporated
herein by reference.
The information in the Proxy Statement set forth under the
caption Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
The information in the Proxy Statement set forth under the
captions Executive Compensation and
Information Regarding the Board and its Committees
is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The information in the Proxy Statement set forth under the
caption Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
and Management is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information set forth under the captions Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions of the Proxy
Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Information concerning principal accountant fees and services
appears in the Proxy Statement Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm and is incorporated herein by
reference.
52
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) The financial statements are set forth under
Item 8 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
All other schedules have been omitted since the required
information is not present in amounts sufficient to require
submission of the schedule, or because the required information
is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes
thereto.
(b) Exhibits:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3
|
.1(1)
|
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation.
|
|
3
|
.2(1)
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws.
|
|
10
|
.1(1)*
|
|
1998 Stock Incentive Plan, as
amended and restated.
|
|
10
|
.2(1)
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement.
|
|
10
|
.3(2)
|
|
Lease agreement between Strategic
Performance Fund-II, Inc. and Qualstar Corporation, dated
September 20, 2000.
|
|
10
|
.4*
|
|
Base salaries payable to executive
officers during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2007.
|
|
10
|
.5*
|
|
Cash bonus plan for executive
officers for fiscal year ending June 30, 2007.
|
|
14
|
.1(3)
|
|
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of Qualstar
Corporation
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm.
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Principal
Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Principal
Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Principal
Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Principal
Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the designated exhibits to
Qualstars registration statement on
Form S-1
(Commission File
No. 333-96009),
declared effective by the Commission on June 22, 2000. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit to
Qualstars Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2000. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit to
Qualstars Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004. |
|
* |
|
Each of these exhibits constitutes a management contract,
compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an
exhibit to this report pursuant to Item 15(b) of this
report. |
53
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
thereunto duly authorized.
QUALSTAR CORPORATION
Date: September 28, 2006
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ WILLIAM
J. GERVAIS
|
William J. Gervais,
Chief Executive Officer and President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
/s/ WILLIAM
J. GERVAIS
William
J. Gervais
|
|
Chief Executive Officer,
President and Director
(principal executive officer and principal financial officer)
|
|
September 28, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ RICHARD
A. NELSON
Richard
A. Nelson
|
|
Vice President, Engineering
Secretary and Director
|
|
September 28, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ CARL
W. GROMADA
Carl
W. Gromada
|
|
Director
|
|
September 28, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ STANLEY
W. CORKER
Stanley
W. Corker
|
|
Director
|
|
September 28, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ROBERT
E. RICH
Robert
E. Rich
|
|
Director
|
|
September 28, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ROBERT
A. MEYER
Robert
A. Meyer
|
|
Director
|
|
September 28, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ NIDHI
H. ANDALON
Nidhi
H. Andalon
|
|
Controller
|
|
September 28, 2006
|
54
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3
|
.1(1)
|
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation.
|
|
3
|
.2(1)
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws.
|
|
10
|
.1(1)*
|
|
1998 Stock Incentive Plan, as
amended and restated.
|
|
10
|
.2(1)
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement.
|
|
10
|
.3(2)
|
|
Lease agreement between Strategic
Performance Fund-II, Inc. and Qualstar Corporation, dated
September 20, 2000.
|
|
10
|
.4*
|
|
Base salaries payable to executive
officers during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2007.
|
|
10
|
.5*
|
|
Cash bonus plan for executive
officers for fiscal year ending June 30, 2007.
|
|
14
|
.1(3)
|
|
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of Qualstar
Corporation
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm.
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Principal
Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Principal
Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Principal
Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Principal
Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the designated exhibits to
Qualstars registration statement on
Form S-1
(Commission File
No. 333-96009),
declared effective by the Commission on June 22, 2000. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit to
Qualstars Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2000. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit to
Qualstars Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004. |
|
* |
|
Each of these exhibits constitutes a management contract,
compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an
exhibit to this report pursuant to Item 15(b) of this
report. |
55