e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-6402-1
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Texas
|
|
74-1488375 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I. R. S. employer identification number) |
|
|
|
1929 Allen Parkway, Houston, Texas
|
|
77019 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
713-522-5141
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
None
(Former name, former address, or former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). YES o NO þ
The number of shares outstanding of the registrants common stock as of May 1, 2008 was 261,140,138
(net of treasury shares).
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
INDEX
2
GLOSSARY
The following terms are common to the deathcare industry, are used throughout this report, and have
the following meanings:
Atneed Funeral and cemetery arrangements after the death has occurred.
Burial Vaults A reinforced outer burial container intended to protect the casket against
the weight of the earth.
Cremation The reduction of human remains to bone fragments by intense heat.
General Agency (GA) Revenues Commissions paid to the General Agency (GA) for life
insurance policies or annuities sold to preneed customers for the purpose of funding preneed
funeral arrangements. The commission rate paid is determined based on the product type sold, the
length of payment terms, and the age of the insured/annuitant. The commission rate is applied to
the face amount of the policy purchased to determine the commission amount payable to the GA. GA
revenues are recognized as funeral revenues when the insurance purchase transaction between the
customer and third party insurance provider is completed.
Interment The burial or final placement of human remains in the ground.
Lawn Crypt An outer burial receptacle constructed of concrete and reinforced steel,
which is usually pre-installed in predetermined designated areas.
Marker A method of identifying the remains in a particular burial space, crypt, or
niche. Permanent burial markers are usually made of bronze, granite, or stone.
Maturity At the time of death. This is the point at which preneed contracts are
converted to atneed contracts.
Mausoleum An above ground structure that is designed to house caskets and cremation
urns.
Cemetery
Perpetual Care or Endowment Care Fund A trust fund used for the maintenance and upkeep
of burial spaces within a cemetery in perpetuity.
Preneed Purchase of products and services prior to use.
Preneed Backlog Future revenues from unfulfilled preneed funeral and cemetery
contractual arrangements.
Production Sales of preneed funeral and preneed or atneed cemetery contracts.
As used herein, SCI, Company, we, our, and us refer to Service Corporation International
and companies owned directly or indirectly by Service Corporation International, unless the context
requires otherwise.
3
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
573,451 |
|
|
$ |
607,555 |
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
(435,854 |
) |
|
|
(466,572 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
137,597 |
|
|
|
140,983 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(25,075 |
) |
|
|
(35,228 |
) |
Loss on divestitures and impairment charges, net |
|
|
(12,046 |
) |
|
|
(7,680 |
) |
Other operating expense |
|
|
(1,106 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
99,370 |
|
|
|
98,075 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(34,069 |
) |
|
|
(37,597 |
) |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,358 |
) |
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
711 |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
1,172 |
|
|
|
(617 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
66,473 |
|
|
|
58,214 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(24,969 |
) |
|
|
(23,497 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
41,504 |
|
|
|
34,717 |
|
Income from discontinued operations (net of income tax provision of $0 and $737, respectively) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
2,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
41,519 |
|
|
$ |
37,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
.16 |
|
|
$ |
.12 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
.16 |
|
|
$ |
.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
.16 |
|
|
$ |
.12 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
.16 |
|
|
$ |
.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of shares |
|
|
260,805 |
|
|
|
293,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of shares |
|
|
264,830 |
|
|
|
298,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
.04 |
|
|
$ |
.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements)
4
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
132,475 |
|
|
$ |
168,594 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
104,434 |
|
|
|
113,793 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
33,747 |
|
|
|
36,203 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
73,182 |
|
|
|
73,182 |
|
Current assets held for sale |
|
|
2,560 |
|
|
|
2,294 |
|
Other |
|
|
31,881 |
|
|
|
27,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
378,279 |
|
|
|
421,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments |
|
|
1,355,025 |
|
|
|
1,434,403 |
|
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments |
|
|
1,345,062 |
|
|
|
1,428,057 |
|
Cemetery property, at cost |
|
|
1,452,443 |
|
|
|
1,451,666 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
1,556,251 |
|
|
|
1,569,534 |
|
Non-current assets held for sale |
|
|
123,318 |
|
|
|
122,626 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,226,524 |
|
|
|
1,198,153 |
|
Deferred charges and other assets |
|
|
436,490 |
|
|
|
400,734 |
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments |
|
|
874,688 |
|
|
|
905,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,748,080 |
|
|
$ |
8,932,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities & Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
347,795 |
|
|
$ |
343,392 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
38,558 |
|
|
|
36,594 |
|
Current liabilities held for sale |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
46,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
386,613 |
|
|
|
426,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,840,398 |
|
|
|
1,820,106 |
|
Deferred preneed funeral revenues |
|
|
571,805 |
|
|
|
526,668 |
|
Deferred preneed cemetery revenues |
|
|
760,511 |
|
|
|
753,876 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
139,024 |
|
|
|
140,623 |
|
Non-current liabilities held for sale |
|
|
91,313 |
|
|
|
91,928 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
381,324 |
|
|
|
383,642 |
|
Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts |
|
|
2,230,721 |
|
|
|
2,390,288 |
|
Non-controlling interest in cemetery perpetual care trusts |
|
|
880,056 |
|
|
|
906,590 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $1 per share par value, 500,000,000
shares authorized, 260,548,606 and 262,858,169, issued
and outstanding (net of 4,971,900 and 1,961,300
treasury shares, at par) |
|
|
260,549 |
|
|
|
262,858 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
1,847,057 |
|
|
|
1,874,600 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(771,775 |
) |
|
|
(797,965 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
130,484 |
|
|
|
152,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,466,315 |
|
|
|
1,492,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,748,080 |
|
|
$ |
8,932,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements)
5
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
41,519 |
|
|
$ |
37,642 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(2,925 |
) |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,358 |
|
Premiums paid on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(650 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
33,201 |
|
|
|
37,468 |
|
Amortization of cemetery property |
|
|
7,385 |
|
|
|
8,213 |
|
Amortization of loan costs |
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
2,114 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
1,948 |
|
|
|
3,562 |
|
Provision for deferred income taxes |
|
|
19,231 |
|
|
|
13,728 |
|
Loss on divestitures and impairment charges, net |
|
|
12,046 |
|
|
|
7,680 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
2,197 |
|
|
|
3,809 |
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based awards |
|
|
(1,324 |
) |
|
|
(3,865 |
) |
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(711 |
) |
Change in assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions and divestitures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in receivables |
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
(506 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in other assets |
|
|
(7,719 |
) |
|
|
4,452 |
|
Decrease in payables and other liabilities |
|
|
(80,877 |
) |
|
|
(11,489 |
) |
Effect of preneed funeral production and maturities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in preneed funeral receivables and trust investments |
|
|
10,760 |
|
|
|
12,352 |
|
Increase in deferred preneed funeral revenue |
|
|
10,610 |
|
|
|
2,914 |
|
Decrease in funeral non-controlling interest |
|
|
(16,927 |
) |
|
|
(13,495 |
) |
Effect of cemetery production and deliveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments |
|
|
16,110 |
|
|
|
13,916 |
|
Increase in deferred preneed cemetery revenue |
|
|
2,591 |
|
|
|
6,550 |
|
Decrease in cemetery non-controlling interest |
|
|
(5,980 |
) |
|
|
(7,405 |
) |
Other |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations |
|
|
46,344 |
|
|
|
115,885 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
46,344 |
|
|
|
127,889 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(29,240 |
) |
|
|
(26,238 |
) |
Proceeds from divestitures and sales of property and equipment |
|
|
7,987 |
|
|
|
43,709 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
(3,882 |
) |
|
|
(212 |
) |
Net deposits of restricted funds and other |
|
|
(21,483 |
) |
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities from continuing operations |
|
|
(46,618 |
) |
|
|
17,037 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities from discontinued operations |
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
(6,582 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(45,760 |
) |
|
|
10,455 |
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
69,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of debt |
|
|
(46,179 |
) |
|
|
(516 |
) |
Principal payments on capital leases |
|
|
(5,888 |
) |
|
|
(6,795 |
) |
Early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,000 |
) |
Purchase of Company common stock |
|
|
(36,606 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
5,889 |
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based awards |
|
|
1,324 |
|
|
|
3,865 |
|
Payments of dividends |
|
|
(10,585 |
) |
|
|
(8,801 |
) |
Bank overdrafts and other |
|
|
(7,829 |
) |
|
|
6,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities from continuing operations |
|
|
(35,428 |
) |
|
|
(99,594 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(706 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(35,428 |
) |
|
|
(100,300 |
) |
Effect of foreign currency |
|
|
(1,275 |
) |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(36,119 |
) |
|
|
38,213 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
168,594 |
|
|
|
39,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
132,475 |
|
|
$ |
78,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements)
7
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Capital in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
stock, par |
|
|
excess of |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares |
|
|
|
stock |
|
|
value |
|
|
par value |
|
|
deficit |
|
|
income |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
262,858 |
|
|
|
$ |
264,819 |
|
|
$ |
(1,961 |
) |
|
$ |
1,874,600 |
|
|
$ |
(797,965 |
) |
|
$ |
152,590 |
|
|
$ |
1,492,083 |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,265 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,265 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,519 |
|
Dividends declared on common stock ($.04 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,446 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,446 |
) |
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,106 |
) |
|
|
(22,106 |
) |
Employee share-based compensation earned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,197 |
|
Stock option exercises and other |
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,335 |
|
Restricted stock awards, net of forfeitures |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(290 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit related to share-based awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,604 |
|
Purchase of Company stock |
|
|
(3,011 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,011 |
) |
|
|
(21,531 |
) |
|
|
(12,064 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,606 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2008 |
|
|
260,549 |
|
|
|
$ |
265,521 |
|
|
$ |
(4,972 |
) |
|
$ |
1,847,057 |
|
|
$ |
(771,775 |
) |
|
$ |
130,484 |
|
|
$ |
1,466,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements)
8
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
1. Nature of Operations
We are a provider of deathcare products and services, with a network of funeral service
locations and cemeteries primarily operating in the United States and Canada. Our funeral and
cemetery operations consist of funeral service locations, cemeteries, funeral service/cemetery
combination locations, crematoria, and related businesses.
Funeral service locations provide professional services relating to funerals and cremations,
including the use of funeral facilities and motor vehicles and preparation and embalming services.
Funeral related merchandise, including caskets, burial vaults, cremation receptacles, flowers, and
other ancillary products and services, is sold at funeral service locations. Cemeteries provide
cemetery property interment rights, including mausoleum spaces, lots, and lawn crypts, and sell
cemetery related merchandise and services, including stone and bronze memorials, markers, casket
and cremation memorialization products, merchandise installations, and burial openings and
closings. We also sell preneed funeral and cemetery products and services whereby a customer
contractually agrees to the terms of certain products and services to be provided in the future.
We divested 70% of Kenyon International Emergency Services (Kenyon), a company that
specializes in providing disaster management services in mass fatality incidents, in the fourth
quarter of 2007. Kenyons results are included in our funeral operations segment through the date
of the sale. As part of the Alderwoods transaction, we acquired an insurance business that we sold
in the third quarter of 2007. The operations of this business through the date of sale are
presented as discontinued operations in our condensed consolidated statement of operations.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
Our condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Service Corporation
International and all wholly-owned subsidiaries. These statements also include the accounts of the
funeral trusts, cemetery merchandise and services trusts, and
cemetery perpetual care trusts in which we
have a variable interest and are the primary beneficiary. The interim condensed consolidated
financial statements are unaudited but include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring
accruals and any other adjustments, which management considers necessary for a fair presentation of
the results for these periods. These condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared
in a manner consistent with the accounting policies described in our annual report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2007, unless otherwise disclosed herein, and should be read in
conjunction therewith. The accompanying year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet data was
derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Operating results for
interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full
year period.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts to conform to the current
period financial statement presentation with no effect on our previously reported results of
operations, financial condition, or cash flows.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to
make estimates and assumptions as described in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
These estimates and assumptions may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial
statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. As a result, actual
results could differ from these estimates.
9
3. Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Business Combinations
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS
141(R)), which establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures
in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired (including goodwill), the liabilities
assumed and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree. SFAS 141(R) also establishes disclosure
requirements to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial
effects of the business combination. The provisions of SFAS 141(R) are effective for us for
business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after
January 1, 2009, except for certain income tax effects which are
effective currently for prior business combinations. The impact of
adopting SFAS 141(R) will be dependent on the future business combinations, if any, that we may
pursue after its effective date.
Non-controlling Interests
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS 160), which establishes accounting and
reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of
a subsidiary. SFAS 160 clarifies that a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary, which is
sometimes referred to as an unconsolidated investment, is an ownership interest in the consolidated
entity that should be reported as a component of equity in the consolidated financial statements.
Among other requirements, SFAS 160 requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that
include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the non-controlling interest. It also
requires disclosure, on the face of the consolidated income statement, of the amounts of
consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the non-controlling interest. The
provisions of SFAS 160 are effective for us on January 1, 2009. We are currently evaluating the
impact of adopting SFAS 160 on our consolidated financial statements.
Split-Dollar Life Insurance Agreements
In March 2007, the FASB ratified the consensus reached by the Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) on Issue No. 06-10 Accounting for Collateral Assignment Split-Dollar Life Insurance
Agreements (EITF 06-10). EITF 06-10 provides guidance for determining a liability for the
postretirement benefit obligation as well as recognition and measurement of the associated asset on
the basis of the terms of a collateral assignment agreement. We adopted the provisions of EITF
06-10 effective January 1, 2008. As a result of our adoption, we
recorded a $3.3 million cumulative-effect adjustment which
increased our Accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2008.
Fair
Value Option
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value
Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS 159). SFAS 159
permits entities to choose to measure various financial assets and
financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on
items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported
in earnings. The fair value option may be elected on an
instrument-by-instrument basis, as long as it is applied to the
instrument in its entirety. The election is irrevocable, unless an
event specified in SFAS 159 occurs that results in a new election
date. We adopted the provisions of SFAS 159 effective January
1, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 159 had no impact on our condensed
consolidated financial statements as we have elected not to measure
any additional financial instruments at fair value as of
March 31, 2008.
Fair Value Measurements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). The
statement defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about instruments
measured at fair value. SFAS 157 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of
fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the
valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as
follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for
identical assets or liabilities in active markets; |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets
or liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or
liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial
instrument; |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the
fair value measurement. |
An assets or liabilitys categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the
lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 157-1. Application of FASB
Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements that Address Fair Value
Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13 (FASP 157-1) and FSP No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB
Statement No. 157 (FSP 157-2). FSP 157-1 amends SFAS 157 to exclude SFAS No. 13, Accounting for
Leases and its related accounting pronouncements that
10
address leasing transactions. FSP 157-2
provides a one-year deferral of the effective date of SFAS 157 for non-financial assets and
liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed in the financial statements at fair
value at least annually. In accordance with FSP 157-2, we adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 for
our financial assets and liabilities that are measured on a recurring
basis at fair value, effective January 1, 2008.
These financial assets are the investments of our funeral, cemetery,
and cemetery perpetual care trusts.
For additional disclosures required by SFAS 157 for these assets, see Notes 4 through 6 to our
condensed consolidated financial statements.
The provisions of SFAS 157 have not been applied to our non-financial assets and liabilities.
The major categories of assets and liabilities that are subject to
non-recurring fair value measurement, for
which we have not yet applied the provisions of SFAS 157, are as follows: reporting units measured
at fair value in the first step of a goodwill impairment test under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142), indefinite-lived intangible assets measured at fair value for
impairment assessment under SFAS 142, non-financial assets measured at fair value for an impairment
assessment under SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets and
non-financial assets and liabilities initially measured at fair value in a business combination
under SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations.
4. Preneed Funeral Activities
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments, net of allowance for cancellation,
represent trust investments, including investment earnings, and customer receivables, net of
unearned finance charges, related to unperformed, price-guaranteed preneed funeral contracts. When
we, as the primary beneficiary, receive payments from the customer, we deposit the amount required
by law into the trust and reclassify the corresponding amount from Deferred preneed funeral
revenues into Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts. Amounts are withdrawn from
the trusts after the contract obligations are performed. We deposited $20.9 million and $18.0
million into and withdrew $38.9 million and $35.0 million from the trusts during the three months
ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Cash flows from preneed funeral contracts are
presented as operating cash flows in our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows.
The components of Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments in our condensed
consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Trust investments, at market |
|
$ |
824,838 |
|
|
$ |
848,195 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
124,211 |
|
|
|
194,728 |
|
Insurance-backed fixed income securities |
|
|
210,687 |
|
|
|
201,258 |
|
Receivables from customers |
|
|
229,010 |
|
|
|
225,905 |
|
Unearned finance charge |
|
|
(5,830 |
) |
|
|
(5,961 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,382,916 |
|
|
|
1,464,125 |
|
Allowance for cancellation |
|
|
(27,891 |
) |
|
|
(29,722 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments |
|
$ |
1,355,025 |
|
|
$ |
1,434,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
cost and market values associated with funeral trust investments
recorded at fair market value at March 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007 are detailed below. Cost reflects the investment (net of redemptions) of control
holders in common trust funds, mutual funds, and private equity investments. Fair market value
represents the value of the underlying securities and cash held by the common trust funds, mutual
funds at published values, and the estimated market value of private equity investments (including
debt as well as the estimated fair value related to the contract holders equity in majority-owned
real estate investments). The fair market value of such funeral trust investments, in the aggregate,
was 95% and 101% of the related cost basis of such investments as of March 31, 2008 and December
31, 2007, respectively.
Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities held by the common trust
funds and mutual funds are classified as Level 1 investments pursuant to the three-level valuation
hierarchy provided in SFAS 157. Our investments classified as Level 1 securities include common
stock and mutual funds. If quoted market prices are not available for the specific security, then
fair values are estimated by using either quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics
or a fair value model with observable inputs that include a combination of interest rates, yield
curves, credit risks, prepayment speeds, rating, and tax exempt
status. These securities are corporate, foreign government, mortgage-backed, and asset-backed fixed income
securities, United States (U.S.) Treasury securities, and preferred stock equity securities, all of
which are classified within Level 2 of the SFAS 157 valuation hierarchy.
The valuation of private equity and other investments requires significant management judgment
due to the absence of quoted market prices, inherent lack of liquidity, and the long-term nature of
such assets. The fair value of these investments is estimated
11
based on the market value of the
underlying real estate and private equity investments. The underlying real estate value is
determined using the most recently available appraisals. Private equity investments are valued using
market appraisals or a discounted cash flow methodology depending on the nature of the underlying
assets. The appraisals assess value based on a combination of replacement cost, comparative sales
analysis, and discounted cash flow analysis. As a result of the
adoption of SFAS 157, we recorded a $3.5 million decrease in the fair
value of our private equity investments held by the funeral trusts.
Such private equity and other investments are included
within Level 3 of the SFAS 157 valuation hierarchy.
We
assess our trust investments for other-than-temporary declines in fair value on a quarterly
basis. Impairment charges, if any, as a result of this assessment are recognized as investment
losses and offset by interest income related to non-controlling interest in funeral trust
investments in Other income (expense), net in our condensed consolidated statement of operations.
As a result of our most recent review at March 31, 2008, we recorded no impairment charges. See
Note 7 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further information related to our
non-controlling interest in funeral trust investments.
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair Market |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
78,560 |
|
|
$ |
605 |
|
|
$ |
(3,783 |
) |
|
$ |
75,382 |
|
Foreign government |
|
|
102,632 |
|
|
|
1,208 |
|
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
103,680 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
18,641 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
(387 |
) |
|
|
18,585 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
18,205 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
(1,550 |
) |
|
|
16,897 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
Equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
1,281 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
358,327 |
|
|
|
7,007 |
|
|
|
(32,104 |
) |
|
|
333,230 |
|
Mutual funds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
120,650 |
|
|
|
1,803 |
|
|
|
(11,321 |
) |
|
|
111,132 |
|
Fixed income |
|
|
140,057 |
|
|
|
2,713 |
|
|
|
(9,537 |
) |
|
|
133,233 |
|
Private equity and other |
|
|
42,984 |
|
|
|
3,415 |
|
|
|
(5,018 |
) |
|
|
41,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust investments |
|
$ |
881,482 |
|
|
$ |
17,340 |
|
|
$ |
(63,988 |
) |
|
$ |
834,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Assets associated with businesses held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,996 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
824,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair Market |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
79,430 |
|
|
$ |
630 |
|
|
$ |
(378 |
) |
|
$ |
79,682 |
|
Foreign government |
|
|
60,330 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
(440 |
) |
|
|
60,234 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
14,937 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
(233 |
) |
|
|
14,910 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
2,670 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
2,706 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
Equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
1,594 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
378,628 |
|
|
|
12,415 |
|
|
|
(6,131 |
) |
|
|
384,912 |
|
Mutual funds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
127,606 |
|
|
|
3,991 |
|
|
|
(2,246 |
) |
|
|
129,351 |
|
Fixed income |
|
|
140,857 |
|
|
|
3,005 |
|
|
|
(1,612 |
) |
|
|
142,250 |
|
Private equity and other |
|
|
43,820 |
|
|
|
2,815 |
|
|
|
(5,297 |
) |
|
|
41,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust investments |
|
$ |
849,892 |
|
|
$ |
23,495 |
|
|
$ |
(16,377 |
) |
|
$ |
857,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Assets associated with businesses held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,815 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
848,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
inputs into the fair value of our market-based funeral trust investments are categorized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
Quoted |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Prices |
|
Other |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
Observable |
|
Unobservable |
|
Fair Market |
|
|
Markets (Level 1) |
|
Inputs (Level 2) |
|
Inputs (Level 3) |
|
Value |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Trust investments |
|
|
$ |
577,595 |
|
|
$ |
215,858 |
|
|
$ |
41,381 |
|
$ |
|
834,834 |
|
The
change in market-based funeral trust investments with significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fair market value, January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
37,865 |
|
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) included in other comprehensive income (a) |
|
|
3,639 |
|
Purchases, sales, contributions, and distributions, net |
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Fair market value, March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
41,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
(a) |
|
All gains (losses) recognized in other comprehensive income for funeral trust investments
are attributable to non-controlling interest holders and are offset by a corresponding
increase (decrease) in Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts. See Note 7
to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further information related to our
non-controlling interest in funeral trust investments. |
Maturity
dates of the fixed income securities included in trust investments,
at market, range from 2008 to 2038. Maturities of fixed
income securities included in trust investments,
at market, at March 31, 2008 are estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
111,408 |
|
Due in one to five years |
|
|
45,516 |
|
Due in five to ten years |
|
|
31,817 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
25,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
214,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2008, purchases and sales of available-for-sale
securities included in trust investments were $135.3 million and $100.7 million, respectively.
These sale transactions resulted in $20.8 million and $15.0 million of realized gains and realized
losses, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2008. During the three months ended
March 31, 2007, purchases and sales of available-for-sale securities included in trust investments
were $227.4 million and $68.0 million, respectively. These sale transactions resulted in $9.5
million and $6.4 million of realized gains and realized losses, respectively, for the three months
ended March 31, 2007.
Earnings from all trust investments are recognized in current funeral revenues when the
service is performed, merchandise is delivered, or upon cancellation of the funeral contract. Only
the amount we are entitled to retain is recognized when a contract is cancelled. Recognized
earnings (realized and unrealized) related to these trust investments were $11.2 million and $11.3
million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
5. Preneed Cemetery Activities
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments, net of allowance for cancellation,
represent trust investments, including investment earnings, and customer receivables, net of
unearned finance charges, for contracts sold in advance of when the property interment rights,
merchandise, or services are needed. When we, as the primary beneficiary, receive payments from the
customer, we deposit the amount required by law into the trust and reclassify the corresponding
amount from Deferred preneed cemetery revenues, and record the amount into Non-controlling interest
in funeral and cemetery trusts. Amounts are withdrawn from the trusts when the contract obligations
are performed. We deposited $25.3 million and $28.6 million into and withdrew $31.2 million and
$37.0 million from the trusts during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Cash flows from preneed cemetery contracts are presented as operating cash flows in our condensed
consolidated statement of cash flows.
The components of Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments in the condensed
consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Trust investments, at market |
|
$ |
942,803 |
|
|
$ |
759,215 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
132,842 |
|
|
|
399,301 |
|
Receivables from customers |
|
|
349,319 |
|
|
|
351,409 |
|
Unearned finance charges |
|
|
(46,971 |
) |
|
|
(47,527 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,377,993 |
|
|
|
1,462,398 |
|
Allowance for cancellation |
|
|
(32,931 |
) |
|
|
(34,341 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments |
|
$ |
1,345,062 |
|
|
$ |
1,428,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cost and market values associated with the cemetery merchandise and service trust
investments recorded at fair market value at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are detailed below. Cost reflects the
investment (net of redemptions) of control holders in common trust funds, mutual funds, and private
equity investments. Fair market value represents the value of the underlying securities and cash
held by the common trust funds, mutual funds at published values, and the estimated market value of
private equity investments (including debt as well as the estimated fair value related to the
contract holders equity in majority-owned real estate investments). The fair market
14
value of
such cemetery trust investments, in the aggregate, was 96% and 104% of the related cost
basis of such investments as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.
Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities held by the common trust
funds and mutual funds are classified as Level 1 investments pursuant to the three-level valuation
hierarchy provided in SFAS 157. Our investments classified as Level 1 securities include common
stock and mutual funds. If quoted market prices are not available for the specific security, then
fair values are estimated by using either quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics
or a fair value model with observable inputs that include a combination of interest rates, yield
curves, credit risks, prepayment speeds, rating, and tax exempt
status. These securities are corporate, foreign government, mortgage-backed, and asset-backed fixed income
securities, U.S. Treasury securities, and preferred stock equity securities, all of which are
classified within Level 2 of the SFAS 157 valuation hierarchy.
The valuation of private equity and other investments requires significant management judgment
due to the absence of quoted market prices, inherent lack of liquidity, and the long-term nature of
such assets. The fair value of these investments is estimated based on the market value of the
underlying real estate and private equity investments. The underlying real estate value is
determined using the most recent appraisals. Our private equity investments are valued using
market appraisals or a discounted cash flow methodology depending on the nature of the underlying
assets. The appraisals assess value based on a combination of replacement cost, comparative sales
analysis, and discounted cash flow analysis. As a result of the
adoption of SFAS 157, we recorded a $2.9 million decrease in the
fair value of our private equity investments held by the cemetery
merchandise and service trusts. Such private equity and other investments are included
within Level 3 of the SFAS 157 valuation hierarchy.
We assess our trust investments for other-than-temporary declines in fair value on a quarterly
basis. Impairment charges, if any, as a result of this assessment are recognized as investment
losses and offset by interest income related to non-controlling interest in cemetery trust
investments in Other income (expense), net in our condensed consolidated statement of operations.
As a result of our most recent review at March 31, 2008, we recorded no impairment charges. See
Note 7 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further information related to our
non-controlling interest in cemetery trust investments.
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair Market |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
44,248 |
|
|
$ |
540 |
|
|
$ |
(2,337 |
) |
|
$ |
42,451 |
|
Foreign government |
|
|
12,933 |
|
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,631 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
15,870 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
(381 |
) |
|
|
15,813 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
14,022 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
(741 |
) |
|
|
13,452 |
|
Equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
2,607 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
2,501 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
496,035 |
|
|
|
7,544 |
|
|
|
(27,166 |
) |
|
|
476,413 |
|
Mutual funds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
252,770 |
|
|
|
6,145 |
|
|
|
(15,812 |
) |
|
|
243,103 |
|
Fixed income |
|
|
172,258 |
|
|
|
3,737 |
|
|
|
(7,740 |
) |
|
|
168,255 |
|
Private equity and other |
|
|
28,795 |
|
|
|
2,198 |
|
|
|
(6,222 |
) |
|
|
24,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust investments |
|
$ |
1,039,538 |
|
|
$ |
21,389 |
|
|
$ |
(60,537 |
) |
|
$ |
1,000,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Assets associated with businesses held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57,587 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
942,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair Market |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
19,371 |
|
|
$ |
899 |
|
|
$ |
(205 |
) |
|
$ |
20,065 |
|
Foreign government |
|
|
14,016 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,312 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
17,297 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
17,659 |
|
Equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
2,979 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
3,090 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
402,028 |
|
|
|
20,923 |
|
|
|
(5,956 |
) |
|
|
416,995 |
|
Mutual funds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
182,214 |
|
|
|
12,905 |
|
|
|
(2,861 |
) |
|
|
192,258 |
|
Fixed income |
|
|
126,728 |
|
|
|
5,535 |
|
|
|
(1,185 |
) |
|
|
131,078 |
|
Private equity and other |
|
|
26,124 |
|
|
|
2,103 |
|
|
|
(3,493 |
) |
|
|
24,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust investments |
|
$ |
790,757 |
|
|
$ |
43,257 |
|
|
$ |
(13,823 |
) |
|
$ |
820,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Assets associated with businesses held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60,976 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
759,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The inputs into the fair value of our market-based cemetery trust investments are categorized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
Quoted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Prices |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
|
Other Observable |
|
|
Unobservable Inputs |
|
|
Fair Market |
|
|
|
Markets (Level 1) |
|
|
Inputs (Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
Trust investments |
|
$ |
887,771 |
|
|
$ |
87,848 |
|
|
$ |
24,771 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,390 |
|
The change in market-based cemetery trust investments with significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fair market value, January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
21,809 |
|
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) included in other comprehensive income (a) |
|
|
3,183 |
|
Purchases, sales, contributions, and distributions, net |
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Fair market value, March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
24,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
All gains (losses) recognized in other comprehensive income for cemetery trust
investments are attributable to non-controlling interest holders and are offset by a
corresponding increase (decrease) in Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery
trusts. See Note 7 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further
information related to our non-controlling interest in cemetery trust investments. |
16
Maturity dates of the fixed income securities range from 2008 to 2038. Maturities of fixed
income securities at March 31, 2008 are estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
1,642 |
|
Due in one to five years |
|
|
34,079 |
|
Due in five to ten years |
|
|
21,765 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
27,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
85,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2008, purchases and sales of available-for-sale
securities included in trust investments were $565.3 million and $104.3 million, respectively.
These sale transactions resulted in $11.5 million and $16.5 million of realized gains and realized
losses, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2008. During the three months ended
March 31, 2007, purchases and sales of available-for-sale securities included in trust investments
were $244.3 million and $108.8 million, respectively. These sale transactions resulted in $13.3
million and $6.9 million of realized gains and realized losses, respectively, for the three months
ended March 31, 2007.
Earnings from all trust investments are recognized in current cemetery revenues when the
service is performed, the merchandise is delivered, or upon cancellation of the cemetery contract.
Only the amount we are entitled to retain is recognized when a contract is cancelled. Recognized
earnings (realized and unrealized) related to these trust investments were $4.5 million and $4.6
million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
6. Cemetery Perpetual Care Trusts
We are required by state or provincial law to pay into cemetery perpetual care trusts a
portion of the proceeds from the sale of cemetery property interment rights. As the primary
beneficiary of the trusts, we consolidate the cemetery perpetual care trust investments with a
corresponding amount recorded as Non-controlling interest in cemetery perpetual care trusts. We
deposited $5.8 million and $4.1 million into the trusts and withdrew $5.2 million and $8.4 million
from the trusts during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Cash flows
from cemetery perpetual care contracts are presented as operating cash flows in our condensed
consolidated statement of cash flows.
The components of Cemetery perpetual care trust investments in the condensed consolidated
balance sheet at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Trust investments, at market |
|
$ |
817,979 |
|
|
$ |
817,228 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
56,709 |
|
|
|
88,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments |
|
$ |
874,688 |
|
|
$ |
905,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
cost and market values associated with market-based trust investments held in cemetery perpetual care
trusts recorded at fair market value at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are detailed below. Cost reflects the investment
(net of redemptions) of control holders in common trust funds, mutual funds, and private equity
investments. Fair market value represents the value of the underlying securities and cash held by
the common trust funds, mutual funds at published values, and the estimated market value of private
equity investments (including debt as well as the estimated fair value related to the contract
holders equity in majority-owned real estate investments). The fair market value of such cemetery
perpetual care trust investments, in the aggregate, was 96% and 100% of the related cost basis of
such investments as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.
Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities held by the common trust
funds and mutual funds are classified as Level 1 investments pursuant to the three-level valuation
hierarchy provided in SFAS 157. Our investments classified as Level 1 securities include common
stock and mutual funds. If quoted market prices are not available for the specific security, then
fair values are estimated by using either quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics
or a fair value model with observable inputs that include a combination of interest rates, yield
curves, credit risks, prepayment speeds, rating, and tax exempt status. Examples of such
securities are corporate, foreign government, mortgage-backed, and asset-backed fixed income
securities, U.S. Treasury securities, and preferred stock equity securities, all of which are
classified within Level 2 of the SFAS 157 valuation hierarchy.
17
The valuation of private equity and other investments requires significant management judgment
due to the absence of quoted market prices, inherent lack of liquidity, and the long-term nature of
such assets. The fair value of these investments is estimated based on the market value of the
underlying real estate and private equity investments. The underlying real estate value is
determined using the most recent appraisals. Our private equity investments are valued using
market appraisals or a discounted cash flow methodology depending on
the nature of the underlying assets. The
appraisals assess value based on a combination of replacement cost, comparative sales analysis, and
discounted cash flow analysis. As a result of the adoption of SFAS
157, we recorded a $4.9 million decrease in the fair value of
our private equity investments held by the cemetery perpetual care
trusts. Such private equity and other investments are included within Level 3 of
the SFAS 157 valuation hierarchy.
We assess our trust investments for other-than-temporary declines in fair value on a quarterly
basis. Impairment charges, if any, as a result of this assessment are recognized as investment
losses and offset by interest income related to non-controlling
interest in cemetery perpetual care trust
investments in Other income (expense), net in our condensed consolidated statement of operations.
As a result of our most recent review at March 31, 2008, we recorded no impairment charges. See
Note 7 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further information related to our
non-controlling interest in cemetery perpetual care trust investments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair Market |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
5,160 |
|
|
$ |
822 |
|
|
$ |
(151 |
) |
|
$ |
5,831 |
|
Foreign government |
|
|
23,704 |
|
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,790 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
42,593 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
(1,216 |
) |
|
|
41,748 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
3,903 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
3,753 |
|
Equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
4,129 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(189 |
) |
|
|
3,943 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
127,202 |
|
|
|
2,554 |
|
|
|
(6,040 |
) |
|
|
123,716 |
|
Mutual funds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
50,180 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
(2,759 |
) |
|
|
47,694 |
|
Fixed income |
|
|
573,925 |
|
|
|
1,028 |
|
|
|
(24,841 |
) |
|
|
550,112 |
|
Private equity and other |
|
|
35,937 |
|
|
|
2,723 |
|
|
|
(5,399 |
) |
|
|
33,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments |
|
$ |
866,733 |
|
|
$ |
8,873 |
|
|
$ |
(40,758 |
) |
|
$ |
834,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Assets associated with businesses held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,869 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
817,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair Market |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
2,647 |
|
|
$ |
703 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
3,349 |
|
Foreign government |
|
|
25,065 |
|
|
|
789 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
25,841 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
42,437 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
(555 |
) |
|
|
42,107 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355 |
|
Equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
2,403 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
2,358 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
128,815 |
|
|
|
3,501 |
|
|
|
(2,840 |
) |
|
|
129,476 |
|
Mutual funds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
44,221 |
|
|
|
1,208 |
|
|
|
(1,003 |
) |
|
|
44,426 |
|
Fixed income |
|
|
555,509 |
|
|
|
3,256 |
|
|
|
(10,714 |
) |
|
|
548,051 |
|
Private equity and other |
|
|
34,894 |
|
|
|
3,145 |
|
|
|
(542 |
) |
|
|
37,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments |
|
$ |
836,339 |
|
|
$ |
12,847 |
|
|
$ |
(15,726 |
) |
|
$ |
833,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Assets associated with businesses held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,232 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
817,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
inputs into the fair value of our market-based cemetery perpetual care trust investments are
categorized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
Quoted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Prices |
|
Significant |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
Other Observable |
|
Unobservable Inputs |
|
Fair Market |
|
|
Markets (Level 1) |
|
Inputs (Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
|
Value |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Trust investments |
|
$ |
721,522 |
|
$ |
80,065 |
|
$ |
33,261 |
|
$ |
834,848 |
|
The
change in market-based cemetery perpetual care trust investments with significant unobservable inputs
(Level 3) is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fair market value, January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
32,644 |
|
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) included in other comprehensive income (a) |
|
|
3,331 |
|
Purchases, sales, contributions, and distributions, net |
|
|
(2,714 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Fair market value, March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
33,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
All gains (losses) recognized in other comprehensive income for cemetery perpetual care
trust investments are attributable to non-controlling interest holders and are offset by a
corresponding increase (decrease) in Non-controlling interest in cemetery perpetual care
trusts. See Note 7 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further
information related to our non-controlling interest in cemetery perpetual care trust
investments. |
Maturity dates of the fixed income securities range from 2008 to 2038. Maturities of fixed
income securities at March 31, 2008 are estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
3,489 |
|
Due in one to five years |
|
|
39,140 |
|
Due in five to ten years |
|
|
11,807 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
21,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
76,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2008, purchases and sales of available-for-sale
securities in the cemetery perpetual care trusts were $58.8 million and $61.4 million,
respectively. These sale transactions resulted in $9.5 million and $13.0 million of realized gains
and realized losses, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2007, purchases and
sales of available-for-sale
19
securities in the cemetery perpetual care trusts were $168.7 million and $42.4 million,
respectively. These sales transactions resulted in $5.5 million and $1.2 million of realized gains
and realized losses, respectively.
Distributable earnings from these cemetery perpetual care trust investments are recognized in
current cemetery revenues to the extent of qualifying cemetery maintenance costs. Recognized
earnings related to these cemetery perpetual care trust investments were $9.8 million and $12.3
million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
20
7. Non-Controlling Interest in Funeral and Cemetery Trusts and in Cemetery Perpetual Care Trusts
We consolidate in our balance sheet the merchandise and service trusts associated with our
preneed funeral and cemetery activities in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 46(R),
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (revised December 2003 an interpretation of ARB No.
51 (FIN 46R). Although FIN 46R requires the consolidation of the merchandise and service trusts,
it does not change the legal relationships among the trusts, us, or our customers. The customers
are the legal beneficiaries of these merchandise and service trusts, and therefore, their interests
in these trusts represent a non-controlling interest in subsidiaries.
The components of Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts and Non-controlling
interest in cemetery perpetual care trusts in our condensed consolidated balance sheet at March 31,
2008 and December 31, 2007 are detailed below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Preneed |
|
|
Preneed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery |
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
|
Cemetery |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Perpetual Care |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Trust investments, at market value |
|
$ |
824,838 |
|
|
$ |
942,803 |
|
|
$ |
1,767,641 |
|
|
$ |
817,979 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
124,211 |
|
|
|
132,842 |
|
|
|
257,053 |
|
|
|
56,709 |
|
Insurance-backed fixed income securities |
|
|
210,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued trust operating payables, deferred taxes, and other |
|
|
(3,250 |
) |
|
|
(1,410 |
) |
|
|
(4,660 |
) |
|
|
5,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
$ |
1,156,486 |
|
|
$ |
1,074,235 |
|
|
$ |
2,230,721 |
|
|
$ |
880,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Preneed |
|
|
Preneed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery |
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
|
Cemetery |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Perpetual Care |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Trust investments, at market value |
|
$ |
848,195 |
|
|
$ |
759,215 |
|
|
$ |
1,607,410 |
|
|
$ |
817,228 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
194,728 |
|
|
|
399,301 |
|
|
|
594,029 |
|
|
|
88,516 |
|
Insurance-backed fixed income securities |
|
|
201,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued trust operating payables, deferred taxes, and other |
|
|
(3,737 |
) |
|
|
(8,672 |
) |
|
|
(12,409 |
) |
|
|
846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
$ |
1,240,444 |
|
|
$ |
1,149,844 |
|
|
$ |
2,390,288 |
|
|
$ |
906,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense), Net
The components of Other expense, net in our condensed consolidated statement of operations for
the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 are detailed below. See Notes 4 through 6 to the
condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the amounts related to the
funeral, cemetery, and cemetery perpetual care trusts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
|
Cemetery |
|
|
Perpetual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trusts |
|
|
Trusts |
|
|
Care Trusts |
|
|
Other, Net |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Realized gains |
|
$ |
20,799 |
|
|
$ |
11,455 |
|
|
$ |
9,487 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
41,741 |
|
Realized losses |
|
|
(14,998 |
) |
|
|
(16,491 |
) |
|
|
(12,993 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,482 |
) |
Interest, dividend, and other ordinary income |
|
|
5,385 |
|
|
|
4,236 |
|
|
|
8,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,007 |
|
Trust expenses and income taxes |
|
|
(4,663 |
) |
|
|
(4,422 |
) |
|
|
(536 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,621 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net trust investment income (losses) |
|
|
6,523 |
|
|
|
(5,222 |
) |
|
|
4,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,645 |
|
Interest (expense) income related to
non-controlling interest in funeral and
cemetery trust investments |
|
|
(6,523 |
) |
|
|
5,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,301 |
) |
Interest expense related to non-controlling
interest in cemetery perpetual care trust investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,344 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,344 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-controlling interest (expense) income |
|
|
(6,523 |
) |
|
|
5,222 |
|
|
|
(4,344 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,645 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,172 |
|
|
|
1,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income, net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,172 |
|
|
$ |
1,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
|
Cemetery |
|
|
Perpetual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trusts |
|
|
Trusts |
|
|
Care Trusts |
|
|
Other, Net |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Realized gains |
|
$ |
9,515 |
|
|
$ |
13,294 |
|
|
$ |
5,508 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
28,317 |
|
Realized losses |
|
|
(6,411 |
) |
|
|
(6,853 |
) |
|
|
(1,221 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,485 |
) |
Interest, dividend, and other ordinary income |
|
|
5,111 |
|
|
|
7,608 |
|
|
|
9,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,667 |
|
Trust expenses and income taxes |
|
|
(3,048 |
) |
|
|
(3,522 |
) |
|
|
(994 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,564 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net trust investment income |
|
|
5,167 |
|
|
|
10,527 |
|
|
|
13,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,935 |
|
Interest expense related to non-controlling
interest in funeral and cemetery trust
investments |
|
|
(5,167 |
) |
|
|
(10,527 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,694 |
) |
Interest expense related to non-controlling
interest in cemetery perpetual care trust investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-controlling interest expense |
|
|
(5,167 |
) |
|
|
(10,527 |
) |
|
|
(13,241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,935 |
) |
Other expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(617 |
) |
|
|
(617 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense, net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(617 |
) |
|
$ |
(617 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
8. Debt
Debt as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
6.5% notes due March 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
45,209 |
|
7.7% notes due April 2009 |
|
|
28,731 |
|
|
|
28,731 |
|
7.875% debentures due February 2013 |
|
|
55,627 |
|
|
|
55,627 |
|
7.375% senior notes due October 2014 |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
6.75% notes due April 2015 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
6.75% notes due April 2016 |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
7.0% notes due June 2017 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
7.625% senior notes due October 2018 |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
7.5% notes due April 2027 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
Revolving credit facility due November 2011 |
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Series B senior notes due November 2011 |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
Convertible debentures, maturities through 2013, fixed interest rates at 5.00%
conversion prices from $13.02 to $50.00 per share |
|
|
4,175 |
|
|
|
4,175 |
|
Obligations under capital leases |
|
|
111,768 |
|
|
|
112,507 |
|
Mortgage notes and other debt, maturities through 2050 |
|
|
38,719 |
|
|
|
15,742 |
|
Unamortized pricing discounts and other |
|
|
(5,064 |
) |
|
|
(5,291 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
1,878,956 |
|
|
$ |
1,856,700 |
|
Less current maturities |
|
|
(38,558 |
) |
|
|
(36,594 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,840,398 |
|
|
$ |
1,820,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of debt at March 31, 2008 were comprised primarily of capital leases. Our
consolidated debt had a weighted average interest rate of 6.78% at March 31, 2008 and 7.09% at
December 31, 2007. Approximately 85% and 89% of our total debt had a fixed interest rate at March
31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.
Revolving Credit Facility
Our revolving credit facility matures in November 2011 and provides a total lending commitment
of $300 million, including a sublimit of $175 million for letters of credit. In March 2008, we
utilized $45.0 million of the credit facility to pay our 6.5% notes due March 2008. As of March
31, 2008, we have also used the credit facility to support $50.5 million of letters of credit. The
credit facility provides us with flexibility for working capital, if needed, and is guaranteed by
our domestic subsidiaries. The subsidiary guaranty is a guaranty of payment of the outstanding
amount of the total lending commitment. It covers the term of the credit facility, including
extensions, and totaled a maximum potential amount of $95.5 million at March 31, 2008. The credit
facility contains certain financial covenants, including a minimum interest coverage ratio, a
maximum leverage ratio, maximum capital expenditure limitations, and certain cash distribution and
share repurchase restrictions. We also pay a quarterly fee on the unused commitment, which ranges from 0.25% to 0.50%.
Debt Extinguishments and Reductions
In the first quarter of 2008, we repaid $45.2 million aggregate principal amount of our 6.50%
notes due March 2008. There was no gain or loss recognized as a result of this repayment.
In the first quarter of 2007, we repaid $100 million aggregate principal amount of our term
loan. As a result of this transaction, we recognized a loss of $2.4 million recorded in Loss on
early extinguishment of debt, net in our condensed consolidated statement of operations, which
represents the write-off of unamortized deferred loan costs of $1.7 million and a $0.7 million
premium to early extinguish the debt.
Capital Leases
In the first three months of 2008 and 2007, we acquired $6.7 million and $17.4 million,
respectively, of transportation vehicles and other assets using capital leases.
23
9. Retirement Plans
The components of net periodic pension plan benefit cost for the three months ended March 31
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation |
|
$ |
363 |
|
|
$ |
2,083 |
|
Actual return on plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,026 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
363 |
|
|
$ |
1,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Share-Based Compensation
Stock Benefit Plans
We utilize the Black-Scholes valuation model for estimating the fair value of our stock
options. This model allows the use of a range of assumptions related to volatility, the risk-free
interest rate, the expected life, and the dividend yield. The fair values of our stock options are
calculated using the following weighted average assumptions for the three months ended March 31,
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
Assumptions |
|
March 31, 2008 |
Dividend yield |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
46.3 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
Expected holding period |
|
5.7 years |
Stock Options
The following table sets forth stock option activity for the three months ended March 31,
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average |
|
|
Options |
|
exercise price |
Outstanding at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
13,568,445 |
|
|
$ |
6.25 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,382,600 |
|
|
|
11.61 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(410,268 |
) |
|
|
3.17 |
|
Expired |
|
|
(7,263 |
) |
|
|
29.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2008 |
|
|
14,533,514 |
|
|
$ |
6.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2008 |
|
|
11,168,033 |
|
|
$ |
5.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
of March 31, 2007, the unrecognized compensation expense related
to stock options of $12.8 million is expected to be recognized
over a weighted average period of 2.2 years.
Restricted Shares
Restricted share activity for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average |
|
|
Restricted |
|
grant-date |
|
|
shares |
|
fair value |
Nonvested restricted shares at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
674,576 |
|
|
$ |
9.04 |
|
Granted |
|
|
290,000 |
|
|
|
11.61 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(362,134 |
) |
|
|
8.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested restricted shares at March 31, 2008 |
|
|
602,442 |
|
|
$ |
10.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
11. Stockholders Equity
Our components of Accumulated other comprehensive income are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
currency |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
other |
|
|
|
translation |
|
|
gains and |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
|
adjustment |
|
|
losses |
|
|
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
152,590 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
152,590 |
|
Activity in 2008 |
|
|
(22,106 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,106 |
) |
Decrease in net unrealized gains associated with available-for-sale
securities of the trusts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,247 |
|
|
|
138,247 |
|
Reclassification of unrealized loss activity attributable to the
non-controlling interest holders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(138,247 |
) |
|
|
(138,247 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
130,484 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
130,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars using the
current exchange rate. The U.S. dollar amount that arises from such translation, as well as
exchange gains and losses on intercompany balances of a long-term investment nature, are included
in the cumulative currency translation adjustments in Accumulated other comprehensive income.
Income taxes are generally not provided on foreign currency
translation adjustments. Included in the decrease in net unrealized
gains associated with available-for-sale securities of the trusts and
offset in the reclassification of unrealized loss activity
attributable to the non-controlling interest holders are $9.9 million
of unrealized losses attributable to the initial adoption of SFAS 157.
The
components of comprehensive income are as follows for the three months ended March 31,
2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
41,519 |
|
|
$ |
37,642 |
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(22,106 |
) |
|
|
4,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
19,413 |
|
|
$ |
42,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Dividends
On February 13, 2008, our Board of Directors approved a cash dividend of $.04 per common
share. At March 31, 2008, this dividend totaling $10.4 million was recorded in Accounts payable and
accrued liabilities and Capital in excess of par value in the condensed consolidated balance sheet.
This dividend was subsequently paid on April 30, 2008.
Share Repurchase Program
Subject to market conditions, normal trading restrictions, and limitations in our debt
covenants, we may make purchases in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions
under our stock repurchase program. In the three months ended March 31, 2008, we repurchased 3.0
million shares of common stock at an aggregate cost of $36.6 million and an average cost per share
of $12.16. After these purchases, the remaining dollar value of shares authorized to be purchased
under the share repurchase program was approximately $109.0 million at March 31, 2008.
Subsequent to March 31, 2008, we repurchased an additional 73.8 thousand shares of common
stock at an aggregate cost, including commissions, of $0.8 million (average cost per share of
$10.33). After these second quarter repurchases, the remaining dollar value of shares authorized
to be purchased under our share repurchase program was approximately $108.2 million.
12. Segment Reporting
Our operations are both product based and geographically based, and the reportable operating
segments presented below include our funeral and cemetery operations. Our geographic areas include
United States and Foreign.
25
Foreign operations consists of our operations in Canada and Germany. We conduct both funeral
and cemetery operations in the United States and Canada and funeral operations in Germany.
Our reportable segment information is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable |
|
|
Funeral |
|
Cemetery |
|
segments |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Revenues from external customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
405,579 |
|
|
$ |
167,872 |
|
|
$ |
573,451 |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
422,844 |
|
|
$ |
184,711 |
|
|
$ |
607,555 |
|
Gross profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
108,547 |
|
|
$ |
29,050 |
|
|
$ |
137,597 |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
102,245 |
|
|
$ |
38,738 |
|
|
$ |
140,983 |
|
The following table reconciles gross profit from reportable segments to our consolidated
income from continuing operations before income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Gross profit from reportable segments |
|
$ |
137,597 |
|
|
$ |
140,983 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(25,075 |
) |
|
|
(35,228 |
) |
Loss on divestitures and impairment charges, net |
|
|
(12,046 |
) |
|
|
(7,680 |
) |
Other operating expense |
|
|
(1,106 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
99,370 |
|
|
|
98,075 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(34,069 |
) |
|
|
(37,597 |
) |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,358 |
) |
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
711 |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
1,172 |
|
|
|
(617 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
$ |
66,473 |
|
|
$ |
58,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our geographic area information is as follows:
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United |
|
|
|
|
|
|
States |
|
Foreign |
|
Total |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Revenues from external customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
519,047 |
|
|
$ |
54,404 |
|
|
$ |
573,451 |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
561,292 |
|
|
$ |
46,263 |
|
|
$ |
607,555 |
|
(Losses) gains on divestitures and impairment charges, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
(9,538 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,508 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,046 |
) |
2007 |
|
$ |
(7,703 |
) |
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
(7,680 |
) |
Operating income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
89,729 |
|
|
$ |
9,641 |
|
|
$ |
99,370 |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
94,210 |
|
|
$ |
3,865 |
|
|
$ |
98,075 |
|
13. Supplementary Information
The detail of certain income statement accounts as presented in the condensed consolidated
statement of operations is as follows for the three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Merchandise revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
$ |
134,221 |
|
|
$ |
146,734 |
|
Cemetery |
|
|
108,432 |
|
|
|
119,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total merchandise revenues |
|
|
242,653 |
|
|
|
266,186 |
|
Services revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
|
259,510 |
|
|
|
265,960 |
|
Cemetery |
|
|
51,050 |
|
|
|
56,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total services revenues |
|
|
310,560 |
|
|
|
322,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenues |
|
|
20,238 |
|
|
|
18,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
573,451 |
|
|
$ |
607,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merchandise costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
$ |
68,663 |
|
|
$ |
71,652 |
|
Cemetery |
|
|
46,376 |
|
|
|
46,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of merchandise |
|
|
115,039 |
|
|
|
118,316 |
|
Services costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
|
112,078 |
|
|
|
118,906 |
|
Cemetery |
|
|
27,179 |
|
|
|
27,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of services |
|
|
139,257 |
|
|
|
146,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overhead and other expenses |
|
|
181,558 |
|
|
|
201,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
$ |
435,854 |
|
|
$ |
466,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Commitments and Contingencies
Representations and Warranties
As of March 31, 2008, we have contingent obligations of $34.0 million (of which $27.5 million
is reflected in our condensed consolidated financial statements as a liability) resulting from our
previous international asset sales and joint venture transactions. In some cases, we have agreed to
guarantee certain representations and warranties made in such divestiture transactions with letters
of credit or interest-bearing cash investments. We have
interest-bearing cash investments of $24.8
million included in Deferred charges and other assets collateralizing certain of these contingent
obligations. We believe it is remote that we will ultimately be
required to fund to third-parties
claims against these representations and warranties above the carrying value of the liability.
27
In
March 2004, we disposed of our funeral operations in France to a newly formed, third-party
company. As a result of this sale, we recognized $44.9 million
of Euro-denominated contractual obligations related
to representations, warranties, and other indemnifications. The remaining obligation of $23.5
million at March 31, 2008 represents the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Potential |
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
|
|
Amount of Future |
|
Value as of |
|
|
|
Obligation |
|
|
Time Limit |
|
Payments |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Tax reserve liability |
|
$ |
23,226 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
10 million |
|
|
5,803 |
|
Litigation provision |
|
|
9,796 |
|
|
Until entire resolution of (i) the relevant claims or (ii) settlement of the claim by the purchaser at the request of the vendor |
|
(1) |
|
|
5,394 |
|
Employee litigation provision |
|
|
8,216 |
|
|
Until entire resolution of (i) the relevant claims or (ii) settlement of the claim by the purchaser at the request of the vendor |
|
(2) |
|
|
8,563 |
|
VAT taxes |
|
|
4,898 |
|
|
One month after expiration of the statutory period of limitations |
|
(1) |
|
|
5,105 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,266 |
|
|
Until entire resolution of (i) the relevant claims or (ii) settlement of the claim by the purchaser at the request of the vendor |
|
(2) |
|
|
4,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
50,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,311 |
|
Less: Deductible of majority
equity owner |
|
|
(5,530 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,763 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
44,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The potential maximum exposure for these two items combined is 20.0 million or $31.6 million
at March 31, 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
The potential maximum exposure for these two items combined is 40.0 million or $63.2 million
at March 31, 2008. |
Litigation
We are a party to various litigation matters, investigations, and proceedings. For each of our
outstanding legal matters, we evaluate the merits of the case, our exposure to the matter, possible
legal or settlement strategies, and the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome. We intend to defend
ourselves in the lawsuits described herein; however, if we determine that an unfavorable outcome is
probable and can be reasonably estimated, we establish the necessary accruals. We hold certain
insurance policies that may reduce cash outflows with respect to an adverse outcome of certain of
these litigation matters. We accrue such insurance recoveries when they become probable of being
paid and can be reasonably estimated.
Conley Investment Counsel v. Service Corporation International, et al.; Civil Action
04-MD-1609; In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston
Division (the 2003 Securities Lawsuit). The 2003 Securities Lawsuit resulted from the transfer
and consolidation by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation of three lawsuits Edgar
Neufeld v. Service Corporation International, et al.; Cause No. CV-S-03-1561-HDM-PAL; In the United
States District Court for the District of Nevada; and Rujira Srisythemp v. Service Corporation
International, et al.; Cause No. CV-S-03-1392-LDG-LRL; In the United States District Court for the
District of Nevada; and Joshua Ackerman v. Service Corporation International, et al.; Cause No.
04-CV-20114; In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The 2003
Securities Lawsuit names as defendants SCI and several of SCIs current and former executive
officers or directors. The 2003 Securities Lawsuit is a purported class action alleging that the
defendants failed to disclose the unlawful treatment of human remains and gravesites at two
cemeteries in Fort Lauderdale and West Palm Beach, Florida. No discovery has occurred, and we
cannot quantify our ultimate liability, if any, for the payment of damages.
Burial Practices Claims. We are named as a defendant in various lawsuits alleging improper
burial practices at certain of our cemetery locations. These lawsuits include the Valls and Garcia
lawsuits described in the following paragraphs.
Maria Valls, Pedro Valls and Roberto Valls, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly
situated v. SCI Funeral Services of Florida, Inc. d/b/a Memorial Plan a/k/a Flagler Memorial Park,
John Does and Jane Does; Case No. 23693CA08; In the Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit in
and for Miami-Dade County, Florida (Valls Lawsuit). The Valls Lawsuit was filed December 5,
28
2005, and named a subsidiary of SCI as a defendant. The plaintiffs allege the defendants
improperly handled remains, did not keep adequate records of interments, and engaged in various
other improprieties in connection with the operation of the cemetery. Although the plaintiffs seek
to certify as a class all family members of persons buried at the cemetery, the court has dismissed
plaintiffs class action allegations with prejudice. Plaintiffs have indicated that they will
appeal this ruling. The plaintiffs are seeking monetary damages and have reserved the right to seek
leave from the court to claim punitive damages. The plaintiffs are also seeking injunctive relief.
We cannot quantify our ultimate liability, if any, for the payment of any damages.
Reyvis Garcia, Alicia Garcia, et al. v. Alderwoods Group, Inc., Osiris Holding of Florida,
Inc, a Florida corporation, d/b/a Graceland Memorial Park South, f/k/a Paradise Memorial Gardens,
Inc., et al. was filed in December 2004, in the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in
and for Miami-Dade County, Florida, Case No.: 04-25646 CA 32. The Garcias are the son and sister of
the decedent, Eloisa Garcia, who was buried at Graceland Memorial Park South in March 1986, when
the cemetery was owned by Paradise Memorial Gardens, Inc. Initially, the suit sought damages on the
individual claims of the Garcias relating to the burial of Eloisa Garcia. The Garcias claimed that
due to poor record keeping, spacing issues and maps, and the fact that the family could not afford
to purchase a marker for the grave, the burial location of the decedent could not be readily
located. Subsequently, the decedents grave was located and verified. In July 2006, plaintiffs
amended their complaint, seeking to certify a class of all persons buried at this cemetery whose
burial sites cannot be located, claiming that this is due to poor record keeping, maps, and surveys
at the cemetery. Plaintiffs subsequently filed amended class action complaints and added
additional named plaintiffs. The plaintiffs are seeking unspecified monetary damages, as well as
equitable and injunctive relief. No class has been certified in this matter. We cannot quantify our
ultimate liability, if any, for the payment of any damages.
Funeral Regulations Lawsuits. We are named as a defendant in various lawsuits alleging
violations of federal and state funeral related regulations and/or statutes, including the Baudino
and Sanchez lawsuits described in the following paragraphs.
Mary Louise Baudino, et al. v. Service Corporation International, et al. was filed in November
2004 in Los Angeles County Superior Court; Case No. BC324007 (Baudino Lawsuit). The Baudino
Lawsuit was initially filed as a putative nationwide class action brought on behalf of all persons,
entities, and organizations who purchased funeral services from SCI. Plaintiffs allege that
funeral related regulations and/or statutes (Rules) required us to disclose our markups on all
items obtained from third parties in connection with funeral service contracts and that the failure
to make certain disclosures of markups resulted in breach of contract and other legal claims. The
plaintiffs seek to recover an unspecified amount of monetary damages as well as attorneys fees,
costs, and interest. We deny all of the claims and deny that the plaintiffs have standing to sue
for violations of the Rules. On September 15, 2006, the trial court granted our motion for summary judgment on the merits.
Plaintiffs are appealing the summary judgment ruling.
Richard Sanchez et al. v. Alderwoods Group, Inc. et al. was filed in February 2005 in the
Superior Court of the State of California, for the County of Los Angeles, Central District; Case
No. BC328962. Plaintiffs seek to certify a nationwide class on behalf of all consumers who
purchased funeral goods and services from Alderwoods. Plaintiffs allege in essence that the Federal
Trade Commissions Funeral Rule requires Alderwoods to disclose its markups on all items obtained
from third parties in connection with funeral service contracts. Plaintiffs allege further that
Alderwoods has failed to make such disclosures. Plaintiffs seek to recover an unspecified amount of
monetary damages, attorneys fees, costs, and unspecified injunctive and declaratory relief. This
case is substantially similar to the Baudino Lawsuit, and we expect that the outcome of this case
will be governed by the law applied in the Baudino Lawsuit.
Antitrust Claims. We are named as a defendant in two related class action antitrust cases
filed in 2005. The first case is Cause No. 4:05-CV-03394; Funeral Consumers Alliance, Inc. v.
Service Corporation International, et al.; In the United States District Court for the Southern
District of Texas Houston (Funeral Consumers Case). This is a purported class action on behalf
of casket consumers throughout the United States alleging that we and several other companies
involved in the funeral industry violated federal antitrust laws and state consumer laws by
engaging in various anti-competitive conduct associated with the sale of caskets.
The second case is Cause No. 4:05-CV-03399; Pioneer Valley Casket, et al. v. Service
Corporation International, et al.; In the United States District Court for the Southern District of
Texas Houston Division (Pioneer Valley Case). This lawsuit makes the same allegations as the
Funeral Consumers Case and is also brought against several other companies involved in the funeral
industry. Unlike the Funeral Consumers Case, the Pioneer Valley Case is a purported class action on
behalf of all independent casket distributors that are in the business or were in the business any
time between July 18, 2001 to the present.
29
The Funeral Consumers Case and the Pioneer Valley Case seek injunctions, monetary damages, and
treble damages. The plaintiffs in the Funeral Consumers Case filed an expert report indicating that
the damages sought from all defendants range from approximately $950 million to $1.5 billion,
before trebling. Additionally, the plaintiffs in the Pioneer Valley Case filed an expert report
indicating that the damages sought from all defendants would be approximately $99 million, before
trebling. We deny that we engaged in anticompetitive practices related to our casket sales and
intend to vigorously contest these claims and plaintiffs damages reports. In both cases, we have
filed reports of our experts which vigorously dispute the validity of the plaintiffs damages
theories and calculations. We cannot quantify our ultimate liability, if any, for the payment of
damages.
In addition to the Funeral Consumers Case and the Pioneer Valley Case, we received Civil
Investigative Demands, dated August 2005 and February 2006, from the Attorney General of Maryland
on behalf of itself and other state attorneys general, who have commenced an investigation of
alleged anticompetitive practices in the funeral industry. We have also received similar Civil
Investigative Demands from the Attorneys General of Florida and Connecticut.
Wage and Hour Claims. We are named a defendant in various lawsuits alleging violations of
federal and state laws regulating wage and hour overtime pay, including the lawsuits described in
the following paragraphs.
Prise, et al., v. Alderwoods Group, Inc., and Service Corporation International; Cause No.
06-164; In the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (the Wage and
Hour Lawsuit). The Wage and Hour Lawsuit was filed by two former Alderwoods (Pennsylvania), Inc.,
employees in December 2006 and purports to have been brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act
(FLSA) on behalf of all Alderwoods and SCI-affiliated employees who performed work for which they
were not fully compensated, including work for which overtime pay was owed. The court has
conditionally certified a class of claims as to certain job positions for Alderwoods employees. On
three occasions, the court has denied without prejudice plaintiffs request for certification of
claims against SCI, and has dismissed such claims without prejudice.
Plaintiffs allege causes of action for violations of the FLSA, failure to maintain proper
records, breach of contract, violations of state wage and hour laws, unjust enrichment, fraud and
deceit, quantum meruit, negligent misrepresentation, and negligence. Plaintiffs seek injunctive
relief, unpaid wages, liquidated, compensatory, consequential and punitive damages, attorneys fees
and costs, and pre- and post-judgment interest. We cannot quantify our ultimate liability, if any,
in this lawsuit.
Bryant, et al. v. Alderwoods Group, Inc., Service Corporation International, et al.; Case No.
3:07-CV-5696-SI; In the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. This lawsuit
was filed on November 8, 2007 against SCI and various subsidiaries and individuals. It is related
to the Wage and Hour Lawsuit, raising similar claims and brought by the same attorneys. We cannot
quantify our ultimate liability, if any, in this lawsuit.
Bryant, et al. v. Service Corporation International, et al.; Case No. RG-07359593; and Helm,
et al. v. AWGI & SCI ; Case No. RG-07359602; In the Superior Court of the State of California,
County of Almeda. These cases were filed on December 5, 2007 by counsel for plaintiffs in the Wage
and Hour Lawsuit. These cases assert state law claims like those previously dismissed in the Wage
and Hour Lawsuit. We cannot quantify our ultimate liability, if any, in this lawsuit.
Stickle, et al. v. Service Corporation International, et al.; Case No. 08-CV-83; In the U.S.
District Court for Arizona, Phoenix Division. Counsel for plaintiffs in the Wage and Hour Lawsuit
filed this case on January 17, 2008, against SCI and various related entities and individuals
asserting FLSA and other ancillary claims based on the alleged failure to pay for overtime.
Plaintiffs seek the same class notice to SCI and related entities that were rejected by the Court
in the Wage and Hour Lawsuit. We cannot quantify our ultimate liability, if any, in this lawsuit.
The ultimate outcome of the matters described above cannot be determined at this time. We
intend to aggressively defend all of the above lawsuits; however, an adverse decision in one or
more of such matters could have a material adverse effect on us, our financial condition, results
of operations, and cash flows.
30
15. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per common share (EPS) excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income
by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects
the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other obligations to issue common stock
were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common shares that
then shared in our earnings.
A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted EPS computations
is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per |
|
|
|
share amounts) |
|
Income from continuing operations (numerator): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations basic |
|
$ |
41,504 |
|
|
$ |
34,717 |
|
After tax interest on convertible debt |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations diluted |
|
$ |
41,517 |
|
|
$ |
34,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax (numerator) |
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
2,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (numerator): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income basic |
|
$ |
41,519 |
|
|
$ |
37,642 |
|
After tax interest on convertible debt |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income diluted |
|
$ |
41,532 |
|
|
$ |
37,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares basic |
|
|
260,805 |
|
|
|
293,096 |
|
Stock options |
|
|
3,733 |
|
|
|
5,167 |
|
Restricted stock |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
Convertible debt |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares diluted |
|
|
264,830 |
|
|
|
298,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
.16 |
|
|
$ |
.12 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
.16 |
|
|
$ |
.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations per share, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
.01 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
.16 |
|
|
$ |
.13 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
.16 |
|
|
$ |
.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The computation of diluted EPS excludes outstanding stock options and convertible debt in
certain periods in which the inclusion of such options and debt would be antidilutive in the
periods presented. Total options and convertible debentures not currently included in the
computation of dilutive EPS are as follows (in shares):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Antidilutive options |
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
3,821 |
|
Antidilutive convertible debentures |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common stock equivalents excluded from computation |
|
|
972 |
|
|
|
4,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16. Divestiture-Related Activities
As divestitures occur in the normal course of business, gains or losses on the sale of such
businesses are recognized in the income statement line item Loss on divestitures and impairment
charges, net.
Loss on divestitures and impairment charges, net consists of the following for the three
months ended March 31:
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Losses on divestitures, net |
|
$ |
(9,075 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,645 |
) |
Impairment losses on assets held for sale |
|
|
(2,971 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(12,046 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,680 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Held for Sale
We have committed to a plan to sell certain operating properties. As a result, these
properties have been classified as assets held for sale in our March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007
condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Net assets held for sale were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
2,560 |
|
|
$ |
2,294 |
|
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments |
|
|
11,237 |
|
|
|
9,944 |
|
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments |
|
|
61,245 |
|
|
|
64,751 |
|
Cemetery property |
|
|
8,294 |
|
|
|
9,341 |
|
Property and equipment, at cost |
|
|
12,854 |
|
|
|
9,968 |
|
Deferred charges and other assets |
|
|
12,819 |
|
|
|
12,390 |
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments |
|
|
16,869 |
|
|
|
16,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
125,878 |
|
|
|
124,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
Deferred preneed funeral revenues |
|
|
9,670 |
|
|
|
8,388 |
|
Deferred preneed cemetery revenues |
|
|
64,604 |
|
|
|
67,141 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
Non-controlling
interest in cemetery perpetual care trusts |
|
|
16,869 |
|
|
|
16,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
91,550 |
|
|
|
92,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets held for sale |
|
$ |
34,328 |
|
|
$ |
32,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
Discontinued Operations
As part of the Alderwoods transaction, we acquired an insurance subsidiary that we sold in the
third quarter of 2007. Accordingly, the operations of this entity are classified as discontinued operations
for all periods presented.
The results of our discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,464 |
|
Costs and other expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,802 |
) |
Gains on divestitures and impairment charges, net |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
3,662 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(737 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
2,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The Company
We are North Americas leading provider of deathcare products and services, with a network of
funeral homes and cemeteries unequalled in geographic scale and reach. At March 31, 2008, we
operated 1,328 funeral service locations and 373 cemeteries (including 205 combination locations)
in North America, which are geographically diversified across 43 states, eight Canadian provinces,
the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Our funeral segment also includes the operations of 13
funeral homes in Germany that we intend to exit when economic values and conditions are conducive
to a sale. As part of the Alderwoods Group, Inc. (Alderwoods) transaction in the fourth quarter of
2006, we acquired Mayflower National Life Insurance Company (Mayflower), an insurance business that
we sold in July 2007. The operations of this business through the date of sale are presented as
discontinued operations in our condensed consolidated statement of operations.
We currently have approximately $108.2 million authorized to repurchase our common stock. Our
financial stability is further enhanced by our $6.5 billion backlog of future revenues from both
trust and insurance funded sales at March 31, 2008, which is the result of preneed funeral and
cemetery sales. We believe we have the financial strength and flexibility to reward shareholders
through dividends while maintaining a prudent capital structure and pursuing new opportunities for
profitable growth.
Strategies for Growth
We are confident about our competitive position, our financial strength, and our ability to
further our principal strategies to generate profitable growth over the long-term. These
strategies are as follows:
|
|
Target our customer; |
|
|
|
Drive operating discipline and leverage our scale; and |
|
|
|
Manage and grow the footprint. |
For additional information on these strategies, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2007.
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
Capital Allocation Considerations
We rely on cash flow from operations as a significant source of liquidity. In addition, we
have approximately $204.5 million in borrowing capacity under our 5-year, $300.0 million revolving
credit facility. We believe these sources of liquidity can be supplemented by our ability to
access the capital markets for additional debt or equity securities.
As of March 31, 2008, we were in compliance with all of our debt
covenants.
33
At March 31, 2008, our current liabilities exceeded our current assets by $8.3 million. We
believe our future operating cash flows and available capacity under our credit facility will be
adequate to meet our working capital requirements.
Cash Flow
We believe our ability to generate strong operating cash flow is one of our fundamental
financial strengths and provides us with substantial flexibility in meeting operating and investing
needs. Highlights of cash flow for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:
Operating Activities Net cash provided by operating activities in the first three months of
2008 was $46.3 million compared to $127.9 million in the first three months of 2007. Included in
the first three months of 2008 is a federal tax payment of $90.0 million related to gains on the
sale of our equity investment in French operations and other major divestitures in late 2007.
Operating cash flow was favorably impacted by a $7.6 million decrease in cash interest payments as
a result of debt repayments in 2007 and lower operating cash outflows
due to the elimination of
duplicative processes and other synergies achieved during the Alderwoods integration. These
improvements were partially offset by the receipt of $7.6 million in insurance proceeds related to
Hurricane Katrina in 2007 that did not recur in 2008 and decreases in
cash flow from operating locations
divested in 2007.
Investing Activities Net cash provided by investing activities decreased $56.2 million in
the first three months of 2008 compared to the first three months of 2007 primarily due to a $35.7
million decrease in proceeds from sales of businesses in North America and a $21.3 million increase
in deposits of restricted funds.
Financing Activities Net cash used in financing activities decreased $64.9 million in the
first quarter of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 as a $36.6 million increase in purchases
of Company common stock and a $14.6 million net change in bank
overdrafts were more than offset by a $69.0 million increase in the proceeds from the
issuance of long-term debt and a decrease in debt payments. Payments of debt in 2008 included a
$45.2 million repayment of our 6.5% notes due March 2008, $1.0 million in other scheduled debt
payments, and $5.9 million in payments on capital leases.
Payments of debt in 2007 consisted of a
$100.0 million repayment of our term loan, $0.5 million in scheduled debt payments, and $6.8
million in payments of capital leases.
Financial Assurances
In support of our operations, we have entered into arrangements with certain surety companies
whereby such companies agree to issue surety bonds on our behalf as financial assurance and/or as
required by existing state and local regulations. The surety bonds are used for various business
purposes; however, the majority of the surety bonds issued and outstanding have been used to
support our preneed funeral and cemetery sales activities that are not backed by trust investments.
The obligations underlying these surety bonds are recorded on the condensed consolidated balance
sheet as Deferred preneed funeral revenues and Deferred preneed cemetery revenues. The breakdown of
surety bonds between funeral and cemetery preneed arrangements, as well as surety bonds for other
activities, is described below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Preneed funeral |
|
$ |
130.5 |
|
|
$ |
134.9 |
|
Preneed cemetery: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merchandise and services |
|
|
138.8 |
|
|
|
148.0 |
|
Pre-construction |
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds supporting preneed funeral and cemetery obligations |
|
|
276.6 |
|
|
|
289.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds supporting preneed business permits |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
Other bonds |
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total surety bonds outstanding |
|
$ |
298.9 |
|
|
$ |
303.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
When selling preneed funeral and cemetery contracts, we may post surety bonds where allowed by
state law. We post the surety bonds in lieu of trusting a certain amount of funds received from the
customer. The amount of the bond posted is generally determined by the total amount of the preneed
contract that would otherwise be required to be trusted, in accordance with applicable state law.
For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, we had $7.9 million and $10.4 million,
respectively, of cash receipts attributable to bonded sales. These amounts do not consider
reductions associated with taxes, obtaining costs, or other costs.
Surety bond premiums are paid annually and are automatically renewable until maturity of the
underlying preneed contracts, unless we are given prior notice of cancellation. Except for cemetery
pre-construction bonds (which are irrevocable), the surety companies generally have the right to
cancel the surety bonds at any time with appropriate notice. In the event a surety company was to
cancel the surety bond, we are required to obtain replacement surety assurance from another surety
company or fund a trust for an amount generally less than the posted bond amount. Management does
not expect that we will be required to fund material future amounts related to these surety bonds
because of lack of surety capacity.
Preneed Funeral and Cemetery Activities and Backlog of Contracts
In addition to selling our products and services to client families at the time of need, we
sell price-guaranteed preneed funeral and cemetery contracts, which provide for future funeral or
cemetery services and merchandise. Since preneed funeral and cemetery services or merchandise will
not be provided until some time in the future, most states and provinces require that all or a
portion of the funds collected from customers on preneed funeral and cemetery contracts be paid
into merchandise and service trusts until the merchandise is delivered or the service is performed.
In certain situations, as described above, where permitted by state or provincial laws, we post a
surety bond as financial assurance for a certain amount of the preneed funeral or cemetery contract
in lieu of placing funds into trust accounts. Our backlog of funeral and cemetery contracts shown
below represents the total amount of future revenues we have under contract at March 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007.
The tables below detail our North America results of preneed funeral and cemetery production
and maturities, excluding insurance contracts, for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Funeral: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed trust-funded (including bonded): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production |
|
$ |
37.9 |
|
|
$ |
37.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production (number of contracts) |
|
|
7,509 |
|
|
|
8,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities |
|
$ |
56.5 |
|
|
$ |
56.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities (number of contracts) |
|
|
12,289 |
|
|
|
14,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed |
|
$ |
90.0 |
|
|
$ |
92.2 |
|
Atneed |
|
|
67.8 |
|
|
|
74.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales production |
|
$ |
157.8 |
|
|
$ |
167.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production deferred to backlog: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed |
|
$ |
34.6 |
|
|
$ |
42.0 |
|
Atneed |
|
|
51.1 |
|
|
|
56.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales production deferred to backlog |
|
$ |
85.7 |
|
|
$ |
98.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue recognized from backlog: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed |
|
$ |
51.8 |
|
|
$ |
41.8 |
|
Atneed |
|
|
48.7 |
|
|
|
52.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue recognized from backlog |
|
$ |
100.5 |
|
|
$ |
93.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance-Funded Preneed Funeral Contracts: Where permitted by state or provincial law,
customers may arrange their preneed funeral contract by purchasing a life insurance or annuity
policy from third-party insurance companies, for which we earn a commission as general sales agent
for the insurance company. The policy amount of the insurance contract between the customer and the
third-party insurance company generally equals the amount of the preneed funeral contract. We do
not reflect the unfulfilled insurance-funded preneed funeral contract amounts in our condensed
consolidated balance sheet.
35
The table below details the North America results of insurance-funded preneed funeral
production and maturities for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, and the number of
contracts associated with those transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Preneed funeral insurance-funded (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production |
|
$ |
68.8 |
|
|
$ |
80.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production (number of contracts) |
|
|
11,593 |
|
|
|
14,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General agency revenue |
|
$ |
11.5 |
|
|
$ |
9.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities |
|
$ |
67.8 |
|
|
$ |
67.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities (number of contracts) |
|
|
13,612 |
|
|
|
15,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts are not included in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet. |
North America Backlog of Preneed Funeral and Cemetery Contracts: The following table reflects
our North America backlog of trust-funded deferred preneed funeral and cemetery contract revenues
including amounts related to Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts at March 31,
2008 and December 31, 2007. Additionally, the table reflects our North America backlog of
unfulfilled insurance-funded contracts (which is not included in our condensed consolidated balance
sheet) at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. The backlog amounts presented are reduced by an
amount that we believe will cancel before maturity based on historical experience.
The table also reflects our North America preneed funeral and cemetery receivables and trust
investments (market and cost bases) associated with the backlog of deferred preneed funeral and
cemetery contract revenues, net of the estimated cancellation allowance. We believe that the table
below is meaningful because it sets forth the aggregate amount of future revenues we expect to
recognize as a result of preneed sales, as well as the amount of assets associated with those
revenues. Because the future revenues exceed the asset amounts, future revenues will exceed the
cash distributions actually received from the associated trusts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Market |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Market |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
|
(Dollars in billions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog of trust-funded deferred preneed funeral revenues |
|
$ |
1.48 |
|
|
$ |
1.52 |
|
|
$ |
1.54 |
|
|
$ |
1.53 |
|
Backlog of insurance-funded preneed funeral revenues |
|
$ |
3.33 |
|
|
$ |
3.33 |
|
|
$ |
3.36 |
|
|
$ |
3.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total backlog of preneed funeral revenues |
|
$ |
4.81 |
|
|
$ |
4.85 |
|
|
$ |
4.90 |
|
|
$ |
4.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets associated with backlog of trust-funded deferred preneed
funeral revenues, net of estimated allowance for cancellation |
|
$ |
1.25 |
|
|
$ |
1.29 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
1.31 |
|
Insurance policies associated with insurance-funded deferred
preneed funeral revenues, net of estimated allowance for
cancellation |
|
$ |
3.33 |
|
|
$ |
3.33 |
|
|
$ |
3.36 |
|
|
$ |
3.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets associated with backlog of preneed funeral revenues |
|
$ |
4.58 |
|
|
$ |
4.62 |
|
|
$ |
4.68 |
|
|
$ |
4.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog of deferred cemetery revenues |
|
$ |
1.72 |
|
|
$ |
1.75 |
|
|
$ |
1.78 |
|
|
$ |
1.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets associated with backlog of deferred cemetery revenues,
net of estimated allowance for cancellation |
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
$ |
1.24 |
|
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The difference between the backlog and asset amounts represents the contracts for which we
have posted surety bonds as financial assurance in lieu of trusting, the amounts collected from
customers that were not required to be deposited into trust, and allowable cash distributions from
trust assets. The table also reflects the amounts expected to be received from insurance companies
through the assignment of policy proceeds related to insurance-funded funeral contracts.
36
Results of Operations Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
Management Summary
Key highlights in the first quarter of 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
Total revenues decreased $34.1 million, or 5.6%, primarily due to significant divestiture activity throughout 2007,
which included the sale of 55 properties mandated by the Federal Trade Commission and 349 non-strategic locations, for total
proceeds of over $400 million; |
|
|
|
|
a 6.3% increase in consolidated average revenue per funeral service compared to the first
quarter of 2007; |
|
|
|
|
consolidated funeral gross profit increased $6.2 million, or 6.1%, in the first quarter
of 2008 compared to the first quarter of 2007; and |
|
|
|
|
comparable cemetery property revenues decreased $7.2 million in the first quarter of 2008
compared to the prior year from one-time
construction revenues of $10.8 million (primarily at our Rose Hills cemetery) in the first
quarter of 2007 that was not repeated in 2008. |
Results of Operations
In the first quarter of 2008, we reported net income of $41.5 million ($.16 per diluted share)
compared to net income in the first quarter of 2007 of $37.6 million ($.13 per diluted share).
These results were impacted by the following items:
|
|
|
a net after-tax loss on asset sales of $9.6 million in the first quarter of 2008 and $8.6
million in the first quarter of 2007; |
|
|
|
|
an after-tax loss from the early extinguishment of debt of $1.5 million in the first
quarter of 2007; |
|
|
|
|
after-tax expenses related to our acquisition and integration of Alderwoods of $0.7
million in the first quarter of 2008 and $7.0 million in the first quarter of 2007; and |
|
|
|
|
after-tax earnings from discontinued operations of $2.9 million in the first quarter of
2007. |
Consolidated Versus Comparable Results
The table below reconciles our consolidated GAAP results to our comparable, or same store,
results for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007. We define comparable operations (or
same store operations) as those funeral and cemetery locations that were owned for the entire
period beginning January 1, 2007 and ending March 31, 2008. The following tables present operating
results for funeral and cemetery locations that were owned by us during this period. As implied by
our definition of comparable operations, these results include results from the properties that we
acquired in the Alderwoods transaction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity Associated |
|
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with Acquisition/ |
|
|
Activity Associated |
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2008 |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
New Construction |
|
|
with Divestitures |
|
|
Comparable |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
North America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue |
|
$ |
403.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
402.1 |
|
Cemetery revenue |
|
|
167.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
167.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
571.5 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
569.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
573.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
571.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits |
|
$ |
108.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
$ |
108.6 |
|
Cemetery gross profits |
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
137.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profits |
|
$ |
137.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
$ |
138.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity Associated |
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2007 |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
with Divestitures |
|
|
Comparable |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue |
|
$ |
421.3 |
|
|
$ |
37.9 |
|
|
$ |
383.4 |
|
Cemetery revenue |
|
|
184.7 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
171.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
606.0 |
|
|
|
50.8 |
|
|
|
555.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
607.6 |
|
|
$ |
50.8 |
|
|
$ |
556.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits |
|
$ |
102.3 |
|
|
$ |
8.3 |
|
|
$ |
94.0 |
|
Cemetery gross profits |
|
|
38.7 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
38.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141.0 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
132.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profits |
|
$ |
141.0 |
|
|
$ |
8.7 |
|
|
$ |
132.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides the data necessary to calculate our consolidated average revenue
per funeral service for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007. We calculate average
revenue per funeral service by dividing consolidated funeral revenue, excluding General Agency (GA)
revenues and certain other revenues in order to avoid distorting our
averages of normal funeral services revenue, by the number of funeral services performed during the period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except average |
|
|
|
revenue per funeral service) |
|
Funeral revenue |
|
$ |
405.6 |
|
|
$ |
422.9 |
|
Less: GA and other revenues |
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted funeral revenue |
|
$ |
391.8 |
|
|
$ |
409.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral services performed |
|
|
77,386 |
|
|
|
86,087 |
|
Average revenue per funeral service |
|
$ |
5,063 |
|
|
$ |
4,761 |
|
The following table provides the data necessary to calculate our comparable average revenue
per funeral service for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007. We calculate average
revenue per funeral service by dividing comparable funeral revenue, excluding General Agency (GA)
revenues and certain other revenues in order to avoid distorting our averages of normal funeral
services revenue, by the comparable number of funeral services performed during the period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except average |
|
|
|
revenue per funeral service) |
|
Comparable funeral revenue |
|
$ |
404.1 |
|
|
$ |
385.0 |
|
Less: GA and other revenues |
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted comparable funeral revenue |
|
$ |
390.2 |
|
|
$ |
374.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable funeral services performed |
|
|
77,096 |
|
|
|
77,802 |
|
Comparable average revenue per funeral service |
|
$ |
5,061 |
|
|
$ |
4,807 |
|
38
Funeral Results
Funeral Revenue
Consolidated revenues from funeral operations were $405.6 million in the three months ended
March 31, 2008 compared to $422.9 million in the same period of 2007. This decrease is primarily
due to the divestiture of non-strategic assets throughout 2007, which contributed an incremental
$37.2 million of revenue in the first quarter of 2007, partially offset by a 6.3% increase in
average revenue per funeral service. Comparable funeral revenues were up $19.1 million, or 5.0%,
compared to the first quarter of 2007 due to a $7.7 million increase in recognized preneed revenues
and an $8.4 million increase in atneed revenues driven by a 5.3%
increase in the comparable average revenue per
funeral service, which more than offset a 0.9% decline in the number of funeral services performed.
Funeral Services Performed
Our consolidated funeral services performed decreased 8,701, or 10.1%, in the first quarter of
2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This decrease was primarily due to our planned 2007
divestiture of non-strategic assets, which contributed an incremental 8,112 funeral services in the
first quarter of 2007. Our comparable funeral services performed
decreased 706, or 0.9%, despite the implementation of our strategic pricing initiative at former Alderwoods locations
discussed below. Our comparable cremation rate of 40.8% in the three months ended March 31, 2008
decreased from the 41.2% rate for the same period in 2007. We have seen a stabilization in our
cremation rate, despite the continued increase in cremation generally in the markets where we
compete, reflecting the impact of our decision to exit unprofitable immediate cremation activities.
Average Revenue Per Funeral
Our consolidated average revenue per funeral service increased $302, or 6.3%, in the three
months ended March 31, 2008 over the same period of 2007 and our comparable average revenue per
funeral service increased 5.3%, or $254 per funeral service. These increases reflect the continued
benefits from our strategic pricing initiative, which was implemented at former Alderwoods
locations throughout 2007. Pursuant to this strategy, we have realigned our pricing focus away from
our products to our service offerings, reflecting our competitive advantage and concentrating on
services that our customers believe add the most value. This strategy has resulted in a decline in
highly discounted, low-service cremation funeral services. These initiatives, although reducing our
funeral services volume, have generated improvements in average revenue per funeral service. We
expect our average revenue per funeral service to continue to improve as we see the full impact of
this initiative.
Funeral Gross Profit
Consolidated funeral gross profit increased $6.2 million in the first quarter of 2008 compared
to the first quarter of 2007 despite the divestiture of non-strategic assets that contributed an
incremental $8.7 million of gross profit in the first quarter of 2007 compared to the first quarter
of 2008. The consolidated gross margin percentage increased to 26.8% from 24.2%. Gross profit
from our comparable funeral locations increased $14.8 million, or 15.7%, primarily as a result of
the increase in revenue described above as well as decreased costs resulting from the elimination
of duplicative processes and other synergies achieved during the Alderwoods integration as well as
other cost initiatives.
Cemetery Results
Cemetery Revenue
Consolidated revenues from our cemetery operations decreased $16.8 million, or 9.1%, in the
first quarter of 2008 compared to the first quarter of 2007. This decrease was primarily due to a
$12.4 million decline in revenue from the divestiture of non-strategic assets. Our comparable
cemetery revenues of $167.4 million in the first quarter of 2008
decreased $4.4 million, or 2.6%,
compared to the same period of 2007. This was driven by $10.8 million recognized in the first quarter of
2007 from one-time construction projects primarily at our Rose Hills cemetery. As anticipated, no
major construction projects were completed in the first quarter of 2008. Increases in both comparable merchandise and services revenue
partially offset this decline.
Cemetery Gross Profits
Consolidated cemetery gross profit decreased $9.6 million, or 24.8%, in the first quarter of
2008 compared to the first quarter of 2007 and our comparable cemetery gross profit decreased $9.1
million, or 23.8%. Our comparable cemetery gross margin percentage
39
was 17.4% compared to 22.3% in the same period of 2007. The lower margin percentage is driven
by the $10.8 million of decreased cemetery property construction revenue, which typically generates comparatively higher
margins. We experienced a $2.4 million reduction in administrative and overhead costs as synergies
from the Alderwoods acquisition were realized. These decreases were more than offset by increased
maintenance costs led by higher fuel charges and increased commissions due to strong production and
the integration of former Alderwoods employees into the SCI compensation structure.
Other Financial Statement Items
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses were $25.1 million in the first quarter of 2008 compared
to $35.2 million in the first quarter of 2007. The first quarter of 2007 included $11.3 million of
one-time transition and other expenses, including severance, related to the acquisition of
Alderwoods, compared to $1.2 million in the first quarter of 2008.
Losses on Divestitures and Impairment Charges, Net
We recognized a $12.0 million net pretax loss in the first quarter of 2008 and a $7.7 million
net pretax loss in the first quarter of 2007 from impairments and asset divestitures primarily
associated with non-strategic funeral and cemetery businesses in the United States and Canada.
Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased to $34.1 million in the first quarter of 2008, compared to $37.6
million in the first quarter of 2007 as a result of the repayment of $100 million of our term loan
in the first quarter of 2007 and $50 million of our Series A Senior Notes in the fourth quarter of
2007.
40
Weighted Average Shares
The diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding was 264.8 million in the first
quarter of 2008, compared to 298.6 million in the first quarter of 2007, reflecting share
repurchases under our Board-approved share repurchase program.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual
results could differ from those estimates. Except as described below, our critical accounting policies are disclosed in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Fair Value Measurements
We measure the available-for-sale securities
held by our funeral, cemetery merchandise and service, and cemetery perpetual care trusts at fair value on a recurring basis.
Changes in unrealized gains and/or losses related to these
securities are reflected in other comprehensive income and offset by the non-controlling interest in those unrealized
gains and/or losses; therefore these gains and/or losses have no impact on our condensed consolidated statement
of operations. Certain of these securities have been classified in Level 3 of the SFAS 157 hierarchy due to significant
management judgment required as a result of the absence of quoted market prices, inherent lack of liquidity, and the
long-term nature of the securities. These securities represent 3.8% of the total $2.6 billion in securities measured at
fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2008.
No other significant changes to our
accounting policies have occurred subsequent to December 31, 2007, except as described below within
Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Accounting Changes.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Accounting Changes
For discussion of recent accounting pronouncements and accounting changes, see Part I, Item 1.
Financial Statements, Note 3.
Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Statements
The statements in this Form 10-Q that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements
made in reliance on the safe harbor protections provided under the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be accompanied by words such as believe, estimate,
project, expect, anticipate, or predict, that convey the uncertainty of future events or
outcomes. These statements are based on assumptions that we believe are reasonable; however, many
important factors could cause our actual results in the future to differ materially from the
forward-looking statements made herein and in any other documents or oral presentations made by us,
or on our behalf. Important factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially from
those in forward-looking statements include, among others, the following:
|
|
Changes in general economic conditions, both domestically and internationally, impacting
financial markets (e.g., marketable security values, access to capital markets, as well as
currency and interest rate fluctuations) that could negatively affect us, particularly, but
not limited to, levels of trust fund income, interest expense, and negative currency
translation effects. |
|
|
The outcomes of pending lawsuits, proceedings, and claims against us and the possibility that
insurance coverage is deemed not to apply to these matters or that an insurance carrier is
unable to pay any covered amounts to us. |
|
|
Allegations regarding compliance with laws, regulations, industry standards, and customs
regarding burial procedures and practices. |
|
|
The amounts payable by us with respect to our outstanding legal matters exceed our
established reserves. |
|
|
The outcome of pending Internal Revenue Service audits. We maintain accruals for tax
liabilities that relate to uncertain tax matters. If these tax matters are unfavorably
resolved, we will make any required payments to tax authorities. If these tax matters are
favorably resolved, the accruals maintained by us will no longer be required, and these
amounts will be reversed through the tax provision at the time of resolution. |
|
|
Our ability to manage changes in consumer demand and/or pricing for our products and services
due to several factors, such as changes in numbers of deaths, cremation rates, competitive
pressures, and local economic conditions. |
|
|
Changes in domestic and international political and/or regulatory environments in which we
operate, including potential changes in tax, accounting, and trusting policies. |
|
|
Changes in credit relationships impacting the availability of credit and the general
availability of credit in the marketplace. |
|
|
|
Our ability to successfully access surety and insurance markets at a reasonable cost. |
|
|
Our ability to successfully leverage our substantial purchasing power with certain of our
vendors. |
41
|
|
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, and our ability to
certify the effectiveness of the internal controls and to obtain an unqualified attestation
report of our auditors regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting. |
|
|
Our credit agreement and privately placed debt securities that may prevent us from engaging
in certain transactions. |
|
|
Our ability to buy our common stock under our share repurchase programs which could be
impacted by, among others, restrictive covenants in our bank agreements, unfavorable market
conditions, the market price of our common stock, the nature of other investment opportunities
presented to us from time to time, and the availability of funds necessary to continue
purchasing common stock. |
For further information on these and other risks and uncertainties, see our Securities and
Exchange Commission filings, including our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Copies of this document
as well as other SEC filings can be obtained from our website at www.sci-corp.com. We assume no
obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements made herein or any other
forward-looking statements made by us, whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There have been no significant changes in our exposure to market risk during the most recently
completed fiscal quarter.
42
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective disclosure controls and
procedures. As of March 31, 2008, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of
our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)). Our disclosure controls and
procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized, and reported within the time period specified by the SECs rules and forms
and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. In light of the material weaknesses described below, these officers have concluded that
our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of March 31, 2008. To address the
material weaknesses described below, we performed additional analyses and other post-closing
procedures to ensure our consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (US GAAP). These
additional analyses and procedures included, among other things: (i) expansion of our normal
quarter-end closing and testing procedures, (ii) assignment of a dedicated team of personnel to
review all account reconciliations, including reconciliations performed by our outsourced
accounting functions, and (iii) deployment of significant in-house and external resources to
complete our income tax provision and various account reconciliations, ensure posting of all
transactions, and perform a detailed review and comprehensive analysis of account balances and
reconciliations. Based on the additional analyses and procedures performed, management has
determined that the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, result of operations, and
cash flows for the periods presented.
Material Weaknesses in Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Status of Remediation Efforts
As
reported in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 we did not maintain effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007 as a result of material weaknesses in (a)
accounting for income taxes and (b) account reconciliations. A material weakness is a control
deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting,
such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Companys annual or
interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Refer to Item 9A in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 for a description of these material weaknesses.
In response to the identified material weaknesses, our management, with oversight from the
Companys Audit Committee, has dedicated significant resources, including retaining third party
consultants, to enhance the Companys internal control over
financial reporting and remediate the
identified material weaknesses. However, these material weaknesses continue to exist as of March
31, 2008.
Accounting for Income Taxes:
Our management has implemented the following remediation steps related to our internal control
over the calculation of the Companys income tax provision and related balance sheet accounts:
|
|
|
Hired an experienced Managing Director in the first quarter of 2008 to lead the
Companys tax department, with responsibility for direction and oversight of all income tax
and other tax functions. |
|
|
|
|
Engaged third party tax advisors in the fourth quarter of 2007 and first quarter of 2008
to address the shortage of qualified in-house tax personnel; such tax advisors have
provided and will continue to provide day-to-day support of the Companys tax provision and
compliance processes until such time as our management deems those
functions to be properly
staffed at an appropriate level with qualified in-house personnel. |
Our management is continuing to implement the following remediation steps:
|
|
|
Development of a comprehensive income tax accounting training program for tax and
certain finance personnel. |
|
|
|
|
Evaluating existing roles and responsibilities within the tax function to ensure they
are staffed by appropriate personnel. |
|
|
|
|
Enhancing standardized documentation and processes in the income tax provision area,
including the review and approval of related journal entries by experienced tax and finance
personnel. |
Account Reconciliations:
Our management has implemented the following remediation steps related to our internal control
over the timely completion and review of account reconciliations:
|
|
|
Created a monitoring function within the Companys financial reporting group in the
fourth quarter of 2007 and first quarter of 2008 to review all
significant account reconciliations. |
|
|
|
|
Engaged a third party advisor to assist our internal subject matter experts in performing
an effectiveness review of certain financial processes and related controls and to advise management on the Companys
organizational structure, control processes, personnel, and technology. |
Our management is continuing to implement the following remediation steps:
|
|
|
The provision of training, including continuing professional education regarding the
impact and importance of business conduct and internal controls, to all employees involved
in the account reconciliation process. |
|
|
|
|
The hiring of additional in-house resources and an ongoing commitment to evaluate
existing roles and responsibilities within the accounting and finance function, to ensure
they are staffed by competent and experienced personnel. |
|
|
|
|
The continued refinement of certain entity-level monitoring controls, first implemented
in the third quarter of 2007 to gain visibility into material issues within business
functions, in order to achieve the level of precision and operating effectiveness desired
by our management. |
Until the remaining remediation steps discussed above are fully implemented, the identified
material weaknesses will continue to exist.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Significant changes to our internal control over financial reporting were
principally related to our remediation efforts described above.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Information regarding legal proceedings is set forth in Note 14 to the unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of this Form 10-Q, which information is
hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in our Risk Factors as set forth in Item 1A of our Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On January 31, 2008, we issued 490 deferred common stock equivalents, or units, pursuant to
provisions regarding dividends under the Amended and Restated Director Fee Plan to four
non-employee directors. We did not receive any monetary consideration for the issuances. These
issuances were unregistered because they did not constitute a sale within the meaning of Section
2(3) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
As of March 31, 2008, the aggregate purchases pursuant to our share repurchase program totaled
$905.0 million. As of March 31, 2008, the remaining dollar value of shares that may yet be
purchased under our share repurchase program was approximately $109.0 million. Pursuant to the
program, we repurchased shares of our common stock during the first quarter of 2008 as set forth in
the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares purchased as |
|
Dollar value of shares that |
|
|
Total number of |
|
Average price |
|
part of publicly |
|
may yet be purchased under |
Period |
|
shares purchased |
|
paid per share |
|
announced programs |
|
the programs |
January 1, 2008 January 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,645,600 |
|
|
|
13.68 |
|
|
|
1,645,600 |
|
|
|
123,088,103 |
|
February 1, 2008 February 29, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,088,103 |
|
March 1, 2008 March 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,365,000 |
|
|
|
10.33 |
|
|
|
1,365,000 |
|
|
|
108,993,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,010,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,010,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
Subsequent to March 31, 2008, we repurchased an additional 73.8 thousand shares of common
stock at an aggregate cost of $0.8 million including commissions (average cost per share of
$10.33). After these second quarter repurchases, the remaining dollar value of shares authorized
to be purchased under our share repurchase program was approximately $108.2 million.
43
Item 6. Exhibits
12.1 |
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007. |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Thomas L. Ryan as Chief Executive Officer in satisfaction of Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Eric D. Tanzberger as Principal Financial Officer in satisfaction of
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by Thomas L. Ryan as Chief Executive Officer in
satisfaction of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by Eric D. Tanzberger as Principal Financial
Officer in satisfaction of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
Undertaking
We hereby undertake, pursuant to Regulation S-K, Item 601(b), paragraph (4) (iii), to furnish
to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, upon request, all constituent instruments defining
the rights of holders of our long-term debt not filed herewith for the reason that the total amount
of securities authorized under any of such instruments does not exceed 10 percent of our total
consolidated assets.
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
May 9, 2008 |
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Jeffrey I. Beason
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey I. Beason |
|
|
|
Vice President and Corporate Controller
(Chief Accounting Officer) |
|
44
Index to Exhibits
12.1 |
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007. |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Thomas L. Ryan as Chief Executive Officer in satisfaction of Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Eric D. Tanzberger as Principal Financial Officer in satisfaction of
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by Thomas L. Ryan as Chief Executive Officer in
satisfaction of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by Eric D. Tanzberger as Principal Financial
Officer in satisfaction of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
45