e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-26339
JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
77-0422528 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(IRS Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1194 North Mathilda Avenue |
|
|
Sunnyvale, California 94089
|
|
(408) 745-2000 |
(Address of principal executive offices,
|
|
(Registrants telephone number, |
including zip code)
|
|
including area code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filings requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer þ
|
|
Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Non-Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
There were approximately 543,540,000 shares of the Companys Common Stock, par value $0.00001,
outstanding as of July 31, 2008.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Juniper Networks, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
$ |
723,917 |
|
|
$ |
541,695 |
|
|
$ |
1,398,131 |
|
|
$ |
1,051,468 |
|
Service |
|
|
155,117 |
|
|
|
123,227 |
|
|
|
303,790 |
|
|
|
240,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues |
|
|
879,034 |
|
|
|
664,922 |
|
|
|
1,701,921 |
|
|
|
1,291,858 |
|
Cost of revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
|
215,134 |
|
|
|
159,891 |
|
|
|
406,925 |
|
|
|
314,833 |
|
Service |
|
|
74,147 |
|
|
|
60,883 |
|
|
|
147,192 |
|
|
|
118,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues |
|
|
289,281 |
|
|
|
220,774 |
|
|
|
554,117 |
|
|
|
432,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
589,753 |
|
|
|
444,148 |
|
|
|
1,147,804 |
|
|
|
858,975 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
186,357 |
|
|
|
148,702 |
|
|
|
357,003 |
|
|
|
289,795 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
190,338 |
|
|
|
156,845 |
|
|
|
376,286 |
|
|
|
307,501 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
35,609 |
|
|
|
27,996 |
|
|
|
69,243 |
|
|
|
55,254 |
|
Amortization of purchased intangible assets |
|
|
7,999 |
|
|
|
22,740 |
|
|
|
33,128 |
|
|
|
45,480 |
|
Other charges, net |
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
1,642 |
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
14,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
429,303 |
|
|
|
357,925 |
|
|
|
844,660 |
|
|
|
712,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
160,450 |
|
|
|
86,223 |
|
|
|
303,144 |
|
|
|
146,719 |
|
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
13,187 |
|
|
|
25,507 |
|
|
|
30,777 |
|
|
|
58,420 |
|
(Loss) gain on minority equity investments |
|
|
(1,499 |
) |
|
|
6,745 |
|
|
|
(1,499 |
) |
|
|
6,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
172,138 |
|
|
|
118,475 |
|
|
|
332,422 |
|
|
|
211,884 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
51,728 |
|
|
|
32,295 |
|
|
|
101,657 |
|
|
|
59,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
120,410 |
|
|
$ |
86,180 |
|
|
$ |
230,765 |
|
|
$ |
152,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
528,963 |
|
|
|
544,224 |
|
|
|
526,435 |
|
|
|
556,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
559,328 |
|
|
|
580,736 |
|
|
|
561,566 |
|
|
|
592,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
1
Juniper Networks, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except par values)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,040,405 |
|
|
$ |
1,716,110 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
263,248 |
|
|
|
240,355 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances |
|
|
423,791 |
|
|
|
379,759 |
|
Deferred tax assets, net |
|
|
174,284 |
|
|
|
171,598 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
42,056 |
|
|
|
47,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
2,943,784 |
|
|
|
2,555,115 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
422,429 |
|
|
|
401,818 |
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
45,177 |
|
|
|
59,329 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
38,036 |
|
|
|
35,515 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
3,658,602 |
|
|
|
3,658,602 |
|
Purchased intangible assets, net |
|
|
41,979 |
|
|
|
77,844 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
109,987 |
|
|
|
97,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
7,259,994 |
|
|
$ |
6,885,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
233,707 |
|
|
$ |
219,101 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
156,051 |
|
|
|
158,710 |
|
Accrued warranty |
|
|
41,774 |
|
|
|
37,450 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
467,090 |
|
|
|
425,579 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
40,470 |
|
|
|
52,324 |
|
Convertible debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
399,496 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
88,979 |
|
|
|
87,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,028,071 |
|
|
|
1,379,843 |
|
Long-term deferred revenue |
|
|
125,721 |
|
|
|
87,690 |
|
Long-term income tax payable |
|
|
79,271 |
|
|
|
41,482 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
21,611 |
|
|
|
22,531 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible preferred stock, $0.00001 par value;
10,000 shares authorized; none issued and
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.00001 par value; 1,000,000 shares
authorized; 544,042 shares and 522,815 shares issued
and outstanding at June 30, 2008, and December 31,
2007, respectively |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
8,699,356 |
|
|
|
8,154,932 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
9,745 |
|
|
|
12,251 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(2,703,786 |
) |
|
|
(2,813,328 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
6,005,320 |
|
|
|
5,353,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
7,259,994 |
|
|
$ |
6,885,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
2
Juniper Networks, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 (1) |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
230,765 |
|
|
$ |
152,827 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
95,764 |
|
|
|
95,194 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
50,073 |
|
|
|
47,441 |
|
Loss (gain) on minority equity investments |
|
|
1,499 |
|
|
|
(6,745 |
) |
Excess tax benefit from employee stock option plans |
|
|
(6,224 |
) |
|
|
(3,792 |
) |
Other non-cash charges |
|
|
772 |
|
|
|
954 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
(44,032 |
) |
|
|
(4,760 |
) |
Prepaid expenses, other current assets and other long-term assets |
|
|
(7,230 |
) |
|
|
9,023 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
9,445 |
|
|
|
(6,142 |
) |
Accrued compensation |
|
|
(2,659 |
) |
|
|
3,075 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
47,728 |
|
|
|
(1,439 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
79,543 |
|
|
|
65,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
455,444 |
|
|
|
350,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(80,847 |
) |
|
|
(75,051 |
) |
Purchases of available-for-sale investments |
|
|
(214,625 |
) |
|
|
(298,615 |
) |
Maturities and sales of available-for-sale investments |
|
|
204,431 |
|
|
|
814,245 |
|
Changes in restricted cash |
|
|
(2,565 |
) |
|
|
2,593 |
|
Payments made in connection with business acquisitions, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(375 |
) |
Minority equity investments |
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(95,606 |
) |
|
|
442,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
77,095 |
|
|
|
89,598 |
|
Purchases and retirement of common stock |
|
|
(121,275 |
) |
|
|
(1,623,190 |
) |
Net proceeds from distributor financing arrangement |
|
|
2,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption of convertible subordinated notes |
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit from employee stock option plans |
|
|
6,224 |
|
|
|
3,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(35,543 |
) |
|
|
(1,529,800 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
324,295 |
|
|
|
(736,263 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
1,716,110 |
|
|
|
1,596,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
2,040,405 |
|
|
$ |
860,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued in connection with conversion of the Senior Notes |
|
$ |
399,153 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Prior period classifications have been revised to reflect the cash flow amounts reported in
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. |
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
3
Juniper Networks, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Description of Business
Juniper Networks, Inc. (Juniper Networks or the Company) designs, develops and sells products
and services that together provide its customers with high performance network infrastructure that
creates responsive and trusted environments for accelerating the deployment of services and
applications over a single Internet Protocol (IP) based network. Beginning in the first quarter
of 2008, the Company realigned its business groups which resulted in the following two segments:
Infrastructure and Service Layer Technologies (SLT). The Companys Infrastructure segment
primarily offers scalable router and Ethernet switching products that are used to control and
direct network traffic. The Companys SLT segment offers networking solutions that meet a broad
array of its customers priorities, from securing the network and the data on the network, to
maximizing existing bandwidth and acceleration of applications across a distributed network. Both
segments offer world-wide services, including technical support and professional services, as well
as educational and training programs to their customers. Together, these elements provide secure
networking solutions to enable customers to convert legacy networks that provide commoditized, best
efforts services into more valuable assets that provide differentiation, value and increased
reliability, performance and security to end users.
Basis of Presentation
The unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information as well as the
instructions to Form 10-Q and the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required
by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion
of management, all adjustments, including normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a
fair presentation have been included. The results of operations for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year
ending December 31, 2008, or any future period. The information included in this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, Risk Factors, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
About Market Risk and the Consolidated Financial Statements and footnotes thereto included in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Revenue Recognition
Juniper Networks sells products and services through its direct sales force and through its
strategic distribution relationships and value-added resellers. The Companys products are
integrated with software that is essential to the functionality of the equipment. The Company also
provides unspecified upgrades and enhancements related to the integrated software through
maintenance contracts for most of its products. Accordingly, the Company accounts for revenue in
accordance with Statement of Position No. 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, and all related
interpretations. The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
delivery or performance has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectability
is reasonably assured. Evidence of an arrangement generally consists of customer purchase orders
and, in certain instances, sales contracts or agreements. Shipping terms and related documents, or
written evidence of customer acceptance, when applicable, are used to verify delivery or
performance. In instances where the Company has outstanding obligations related to product delivery
or the final acceptance of the product, revenue is deferred until all the delivery and acceptance
criteria have been met. The Company assesses whether the sales price is fixed or determinable based
on payment terms and whether the sales price is subject to refund or adjustment. Collectability is
assessed based on the creditworthiness of the customer as determined by credit checks and the
customers payment history to the
4
Company. Accounts receivable are recorded net of allowance for doubtful accounts, estimated
customer returns and pricing credits.
For arrangements with multiple elements, such as sales of products that include services, the
Company allocates revenue to each element using the residual method based on vendor specific
objective evidence of fair value of the undelivered items. Under the residual method, the amount of
revenue allocated to delivered elements equals the total arrangement consideration less the
aggregate fair value of any undelivered elements. Vendor specific objective evidence of fair value
is based on the price charged when the element is sold separately. If vendor specific objective
evidence of fair value of one or more undelivered items does not exist, revenue is deferred and
recognized at the earlier of (i) delivery of those elements or (ii) when fair value can be
established unless maintenance is the only undelivered element, in which case, the entire
arrangement fee is recognized ratably over the contractual support period. The Company accounts for
multiple agreements with a single customer as one arrangement if the contractual terms and/or
substance of those agreements indicate that they may be so closely related that they are, in
effect, parts of a single arrangement.
For sales to direct end-users and value-added resellers, the Company recognizes product revenue
upon transfer of title and risk of loss, which is generally upon shipment. It is the Companys
practice to identify an end-user prior to shipment to a value-added reseller. For end-users and
value-added resellers, the Company has no significant obligations for future performance such as
rights of return or pricing credits. A portion of the Companys sales are made through distributors
under agreements allowing for pricing credits and/or rights of return. Product revenue on sales
made through these distributors is recognized upon sell-through as reported by the distributors to
the Company. Deferred revenue on shipments to distributors reflects the effects of distributor
pricing credits and the amount of gross margin expected to be realized upon sell-through.
The Company sells certain interests in accounts receivable on a non-recourse basis as part of a
distributor accounts receivable financing arrangement which was established by the Company with a
major financing company. Accounts receivable sold under this arrangement in advance of revenue
recognition are accounted for as short-term debt and had a balance of $12.7 million and $10.0
million as of June 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. Deferred revenue on shipments to
distributors reflects these effects of distributor pricing credits and the amount of gross margin
expected to be realized upon sell-through. Deferred revenue is recorded net of the related product
costs of revenue.
The Company records reductions to revenue for estimated product returns and pricing adjustments,
such as rebates and price protection, in the same period that the related revenue is recorded. The
amount of these reductions is based on historical sales returns and price protection credits,
specific criteria included in rebate agreements, and other factors known at the time. In addition,
the Company reports revenue net of sales-taxes.
Shipping charges billed to customers are included in product revenue and the related shipping costs
are included in cost of product revenues. Costs associated with cooperative advertising programs
are estimated and recorded as a reduction of revenue at the time the related sales are recognized.
Services include maintenance, training and professional services. In addition to providing
unspecified upgrades and enhancements on a when and if available basis, the Companys maintenance
contracts include 24-hour technical support and hardware repair and replacement parts. Maintenance
is offered under renewable contracts. Revenue from maintenance contracts is deferred and is
generally recognized ratably over the contractual support period, which is generally one to three
years. Revenue from training and professional services is recognized as the services are completed
or ratably over the contractual period, which is generally one year or less.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, (SFAS 123R) which requires the
measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all stock-based awards made to employees
and directors including employee stock options, restricted stock units (RSUs), performance share
awards and employee stock purchases under the Companys Employee Stock Purchase Plan based on
estimated fair values. SFAS 123R requires companies to estimate the fair value of stock-based
awards on the date of grant using an option pricing model. The
5
Company uses the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model and incorporates a Monte Carlo
simulation when appropriate to determine the fair value of stock based awards under SFAS 123R. The
value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over
the requisite service periods in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of
operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, included compensation expense
for stock-based awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of the adoption of SFAS 123R, based
on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, (SFAS 123) and
compensation expense for the stock-based awards granted subsequent to December 31, 2005, based on
the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R. Compensation
expense for expected-to-vest stock-based awards that were granted on or prior to December 31, 2005,
was valued under the multiple-option approach and will continue to be amortized using the
accelerated attribution method. Subsequent to December 31, 2005, compensation expense for
expected-to-vest stock-based awards is valued under the single-option approach and amortized on a
straight-line basis, net of estimated forfeitures.
Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets
Goodwill is not subject to amortization but is assessed annually, at a minimum, for impairment by
applying a fair value based test. Future goodwill impairment tests could result in a charge to
earnings. Purchased intangible assets with finite lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over
their respective estimated useful lives.
Impairment
The Company evaluates goodwill, at a minimum, on an annual basis and whenever events and changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Juniper
Networks conducted its annual impairment test as of November 1, 2007, and determined that the
carrying value of its goodwill was not impaired. There were no events or circumstances from that
date through June 30, 2008, that would impact this assessment. Future impairment indicators,
including declines in the Companys market capitalization or a decrease in revenue or profitability
levels, could require impairment charges to be recorded.
The Company evaluates long-lived assets held-for-use for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. There were no
impairments for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. For the six months ended June 30,
2008, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $5.0 million, included in amortization of
purchased intangible assets, in connection with the phase out of its DX product, and nil for the
six months ended June 30, 2007.
Warranties
Juniper Networks generally offers a one-year warranty on all of its hardware products and a 90-day
warranty on the media that contains the software embedded in the products. The warranty generally
includes parts and labor obtained through the Companys 24-hour service center. On occasion, the
specific terms and conditions of those warranties vary. The Company accrues for warranty costs
based on estimates of the costs that may be incurred under its warranty obligations, including
material costs, technical support labor costs and associated overhead. The warranty accrual is
included in the Companys cost of revenues and is recorded at the time revenue is recognized.
Factors that affect the Companys warranty liability include the number of installed units, its
estimates of anticipated rates of warranty claims, costs per claim and estimated support labor
costs and the associated overhead. The Company periodically assesses the adequacy of its recorded
warranty liabilities and adjusts the amounts as necessary.
Concentrations
Financial instruments, including those held in foreign branches of global banks, that subject
Juniper Networks to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents,
investments and accounts receivable. Juniper Networks maintains its cash, cash equivalents and
available-for-sale investments in fixed income securities and money market funds with high-quality
institutions and only invests in high quality credit instruments. Deposits held with banks,
including those held in foreign branches of global banks, may exceed the amount of insurance
6
provided on such deposits. Generally, these deposits may be redeemed upon demand and therefore bear
minimal risk.
Generally, credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is diversified due to the number of
entities comprising the Companys customer base and their dispersion across different geographic
locations throughout the world. Juniper Networks performs ongoing credit evaluations of its
customers and generally does not require collateral on accounts receivable. Juniper Networks
maintains reserves for potential credit losses and historically such losses have been within
managements expectations.
The Company relies on sole suppliers for certain of its components such as application-specific
integrated circuits (ASICs) and custom sheet metal. Additionally, Juniper Networks relies
primarily on a limited number of significant independent contract manufacturers for the production
of all of its products. The inability of any supplier or manufacturer to fulfill supply
requirements of Juniper Networks could negatively impact future operating results.
Fair Value Accounting
In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities-including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 expands the use
of fair value accounting to eligible financial assets and liabilities. SFAS 159 is effective
beginning on January 1, 2008. The Company evaluated its existing financial instruments and elected
not to adopt the fair value option on its financial instruments. However, because the SFAS 159
election is based on an instrument-by-instrument election at the time the Company first recognizes
an eligible item or enters into an eligible firm commitment, the Company may decide to exercise the
option on new items when business reasons support doing so in the future. As a result, SFAS 159 did
not have any impact on the Companys financial condition or results of operations as of and for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, (SFAS 157), which is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and for interim periods within those
years. This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and
expands the related disclosure requirements. This statement applies to accounting pronouncements
that require or permit fair value measurements with certain exclusions. The statement provides that
a fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell an asset or transfer a liability
occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market,
the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. SFAS 157 defines fair value based upon an
exit price model.
The Company adopted the effective portions of SFAS 157 on January 1, 2008. The FASB issued FASB
Staff Positions (FSP) 157-1 and 157-2. FSP 157-1 amends SFAS 157 to exclude SFAS No. 13,
Accounting for Leases, (SFAS 13) and its related interpretive accounting pronouncements that
address leasing transactions, while FSP 157-2 delays the effective date of the application of SFAS
157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a
nonrecurring basis. Non-recurring nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities for which the
Company has not applied the provisions of SFAS 157 include those measured at fair value in goodwill
impairment tests, intangible assets measured at fair value for impairment, asset retirement
obligations initially measured at fair value, and those initially measured at fair value in a
business combination.
SFAS 157 establishes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to fair value measurement.
This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows: Level 1 inputs are
unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2 inputs are
quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for
substantially the full term of the financial instrument; Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs
based on our own assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value. A financial
asset or liabilitys classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level
input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
For disclosure purposes, the Company is required to measure the fair value of outstanding debt on a
recurring basis. Long-term debt is reported at amortized cost in accordance with SFAS No. 107,
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments. The fair value of long-term debt, based on
quoted market prices (Level 1), was $659.2
7
million at December 31, 2007. The Companys Senior Convertible Notes were converted into shares of
the Companys common stock during the three months ended June 30, 2008. See Note 4 Other
Financial Information under Senior Convertible Notes.
The following table provides the assets carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis as of
June 30, 2008 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Observable |
|
Assets Measured at |
|
|
|
|
|
For Identical |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Remaining |
|
Fair Value on a Recurring Basis |
|
Total |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Derivatives |
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash, cash equivalents,
and available-for-sale
investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper |
|
$ |
275.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
275.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
133.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Government securities |
|
|
297.8 |
|
|
|
52.3 |
|
|
|
245.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds |
|
|
1,233.3 |
|
|
|
1,233.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publicly-traded securities |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents, and
available-for-sale
investments |
|
|
1,945.5 |
|
|
|
1,290.6 |
|
|
|
654.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
|
403.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash, cash
equivalents, and
available-for-sale
investments |
|
$ |
2,348.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,290.6 |
|
|
$ |
654.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
Reported as: |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,040.4 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
263.2 |
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
45.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash, cash equivalents, and available-for-sale investments |
|
$ |
2,348.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company classifies investments within Level 1 if quote prices are available in active markets.
Level 1 assets include instruments valued based on quoted market prices in active markets which
generally include money market funds, corporate equity securities publicly traded on major
exchanges and U.S. Treasury notes with quoted prices on active markets.
The Company classifies items in Level 2 if the investments are valued using observable inputs to
quoted market prices, benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes or alternative
pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. These investments include: U.S.
T-Bills, government agencies, corporate bonds and commercial paper. Investments are held by a
custodian who obtains investment prices from a third party pricing provider that uses standard
inputs to models which vary by asset class. The Company classifies all derivatives in Level 2 using
observable market inputs and standard valuation techniques.
The Company did not hold financial assets and liabilities which were recorded at fair value in the
Level 3 category as of June 30, 2008.
Seasonality
Many companies in the networking industry experience adverse seasonal fluctuations in customer
spending patterns, particularly in the first and third quarters. In addition, the Companys SLT
segment has experienced seasonally strong customer demand in the fourth quarter. This historical
pattern should not be considered a reliable indicator of the Companys future net revenues or
financial performance.
8
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP Accounting Principles Board (APB) 14-1, Accounting for
Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash
Settlement) (FSP APB 14-1). FSP APB 14-1 requires the issuer of certain convertible debt
instruments that may be settled in cash (or other assets) on conversion to separately account for
the liability (debt) and equity (conversion option) components of the instrument in a manner that
reflects the issuers non-convertible debt borrowing rate. FSP APB 14-1 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2008, on a retroactive basis, and will be adopted by the Company
effective January 1, 2009. The Companys adoption of FSP APB 14-1 will not impact its consolidated
results of operations and financial condition.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets
(FSP FAS 142-3). FSP FAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal
or extension assumptions used in determining the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. This new
guidance applies prospectively to intangible assets that are acquired individually or with a group
of other assets in business combinations and asset acquisitions. FSP FAS 142-3 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and early adoption is prohibited. The impact of FSP
FAS 142-3 will depend upon the nature, terms, and size of the acquisitions the Company consummates
after the effective date.
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 161, Disclosures
about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS
161). SFAS 161 enhances required disclosures regarding derivatives and hedging activities,
including enhanced disclosures regarding how: (a) an entity uses derivative instruments, (b)
derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FASB Statement No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and (c) derivative instruments and
related hedged items affect an entitys financial position, financial performance and cash flows.
SFAS 161 is effective for the fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and will be adopted
by the Company on January 1, 2009. The Company is currently assessing the application of this
standard on its future consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS
160). SFAS 160 addresses the accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in
subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount of consolidated net income
attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parents ownership
interest, and the valuation of retained noncontrolling equity investments when a subsidiary is
deconsolidated. SFAS 160 also establishes disclosure requirements that clearly identify and
distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners.
SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and will be adopted by
the Company on January 1, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 160 to have a
material effect on its consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 141 (revised
2007), Business Combinations (SFAS 141R). SFAS 141R establishes principles and requirements for
the acquirer of a business to recognize and measure in its financial statements the identifiable
assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree. The
statement also provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the
business combination and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial
statement to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS 141R is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.
Earlier application of SFAS 141R is prohibited. Accordingly, any business combinations the Company
may engage in will be recorded and disclosed following existing GAAP until January 1, 2009. The
impact of SFAS 141R will depend upon the nature, terms, and size of the acquisitions the Company
consummates after the effective date.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period balances in order to conform to the
current periods presentation.
9
Note 2. Investments
The following is a summary of the Companys available-for-sale investments, at fair value (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Government securities |
|
$ |
138.3 |
|
|
$ |
88.0 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
127.8 |
|
|
|
203.1 |
|
Other |
|
|
42.3 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
308.4 |
|
|
$ |
299.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported as: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments |
|
$ |
263.2 |
|
|
$ |
240.4 |
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
45.2 |
|
|
|
59.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
308.4 |
|
|
$ |
299.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Fair |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2008 |
|
Due within one year |
|
$ |
263.2 |
|
Due between one and five years |
|
|
45.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale investments |
|
$ |
308.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 3. Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets
Goodwill
In the first quarter of 2008, the Company realigned its organizational structure to include its
service business into the related Infrastructure and SLT segments. As a result, the Company, with
the assistance of an external service provider, reallocated goodwill of the former Service segment
to the Infrastructure and SLT segments based on a relative fair value approach. Fair value was
based on comparative market values and discounted cash flows. There was no indication of impairment
when goodwill was reallocated to the new reporting segments.
The following table presents changes in goodwill by segment during the six months ended June 30,
2008 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Segments |
|
2007 |
|
|
Reallocation |
|
|
2008 |
|
Infrastructure |
|
$ |
976.6 |
|
|
$ |
523.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,500.5 |
|
Service Layer Technologies |
|
|
1,879.7 |
|
|
|
278.4 |
|
|
|
2,158.1 |
|
Service |
|
|
802.3 |
|
|
|
(802.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,658.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,658.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
Purchased Intangible Assets
The following table presents details of the Companys purchased intangible assets with definite
lives (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
Net |
|
As of June 30, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technologies and patents |
|
$ |
379.6 |
|
|
$ |
(352.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.3 |
) |
|
$ |
23.2 |
|
Other |
|
|
68.9 |
|
|
|
(49.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
448.5 |
|
|
$ |
(401.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(5.0 |
) |
|
$ |
42.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technologies and patents |
|
$ |
379.6 |
|
|
$ |
(326.0 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
53.6 |
|
Other |
|
|
68.9 |
|
|
|
(44.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
448.5 |
|
|
$ |
(370.7 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
77.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no additions to purchased intangible assets during the three and six months ended June
30, 2008, and 2007.
Amortization of purchased intangible assets of $9.4 million and $24.1 million were included in
operating expenses and cost of product revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2008, and 2007,
respectively, and $35.9 million and $48.2 million were included in operating expenses and cost of
product revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2008, and 2007, respectively. There were no
impairment charges in the three months ended June 30, 2008. In the six months ended June 30, 2008,
the Company recorded an impairment charge of $5.0 million, included in its amortization of
purchased intangible assets, due to the phase out of its DX products. The estimated future
amortization expense of purchased intangible assets with definite lives for future periods is as
follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ending December 31, |
|
Amount |
|
2008 (remaining six months) |
|
$ |
13.2 |
|
2009 |
|
|
15.4 |
|
2010 |
|
|
3.9 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2.0 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1.2 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
42.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 4. Other Financial Information
Restricted Cash
As of June 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, restricted cash of $38.0 million and $35.5 million,
respectively, consisted of escrow accounts required by certain acquisitions completed in 2005, the
India Gratuity Trust and the Directors & Officers (D&O) indemnification trust. During the six
months ended June 30, 2008, the Company increased its restricted cash by $0.8 million to fund the
India Gratuity Trust, which covers statutory severance obligations in the event of termination of
its India employees who have provided five or more years of continuous service. Juniper Networks
established the D&O trust to secure its indemnification obligations to certain directors, officers,
and other specified employees, arising from their activities as such, in the event that the Company
does not provide or is financially incapable of providing indemnification. During the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008, the Company also increased its restricted cash balance by $3.1 million
and $1.8 million, respectively, in connection with its D&O trust. During the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008, the Company made no releases from restricted cash for escrow payments
associated with past acquisitions.
Minority Equity Investments
As of June 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, the carrying values of the Companys minority equity
investments in privately held companies of $23.8 million and $23.3 million, respectively, were
included in other long-term assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company did
not make any minority equity investments in the three months ended June 30, 2008. During the six
months ended June 30, 2008, the Company invested a total of
11
$2.0 million in a privately-held company. During the three months ended June 30, 2008, the Company
recognized a loss of $1.5 million related to investments in privately-held companies.
The Companys minority equity investments in privately held companies are carried at cost as the
Company does not have a controlling interest and does not have the ability to exercise significant
influence over these companies. The Company adjusts its minority equity investments for any
impairment if the fair value exceeds the carrying value of the respective assets.
Other Long-Term Assets
Details of the Companys other long-term assets are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
65.8 |
|
|
$ |
59.0 |
|
Long-term assets |
|
|
44.2 |
|
|
|
38.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
110.0 |
|
|
$ |
97.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranties
Changes in the Companys warranty reserve were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
41.3 |
|
|
$ |
35.3 |
|
|
$ |
37.5 |
|
|
$ |
34.8 |
|
Provisions made during the period, net |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
Actual costs incurred during the period |
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
|
|
(20.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance (current) |
|
$ |
41.8 |
|
|
$ |
35.7 |
|
|
$ |
41.8 |
|
|
$ |
35.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Revenue
Amounts billed in excess of revenue recognized are included as deferred revenue and accounts
receivable in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. Product deferred revenue, net
of the related cost of revenue, includes shipments to end-users, value-add resellers, and
distributors. The portion of deferred revenue that the Company anticipates will be recognized
during the succeeding 12-month period is recorded as current deferred revenue, and the remaining
portion is recorded as non-current deferred revenue. The Company may reclassify amounts between
current and non-current deferred revenue based upon its assessment of when all revenue recognition
criteria are expected to be met. Details of the Companys deferred revenue are as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Service |
|
$ |
424.1 |
|
|
$ |
367.3 |
|
Product |
|
|
168.7 |
|
|
|
146.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
592.8 |
|
|
$ |
513.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported as: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
$ |
467.1 |
|
|
$ |
425.6 |
|
Non-Current |
|
|
125.7 |
|
|
|
87.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
592.8 |
|
|
$ |
513.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and Acquisition Related Reserves
Restructuring
Restructuring charges were based on the Companys restructuring plans that were committed to by
management. Any changes in the estimates of executing the approved plans will be reflected in the
Companys results of operations.
12
In the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company paid $0.2 million and $0.4 million,
respectively, for facility charges associated with its restructuring plans initiated in prior
years. As of June 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, the restructuring reserve of $0.4 million and
$0.6 million, respectively, was related to future facility charges. Amounts related to the net
facility charges are included in other accrued liabilities and will be paid over the remaining
respective lease term through July 2008. The difference between the actual future rent payments and
the net present value will be recorded as operating expenses when incurred. During the three and
six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company had no additional restructuring charges.
Acquisition Related Restructuring Reserves
Acquisition related reserves pertain to the restructuring reserves established in connection with
the Companys past acquisitions. In conjunction with various acquisitions, the Company accrued for
acquisition related restructuring charges primarily related to severance and facility charges.
The Company paid $0.4 million and $0.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008,
respectively, and $0.5 million and $1.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007,
respectively, primarily for facility related charges. The Company had no adjustments to its
existing acquisition related restructuring reserves for the three and six months ended June 30,
2008, and recorded a $0.3 million adjustment to its acquisition related restructuring reserves for
facility related charges in the three and six months ended June 30, 2007. As of June 30, 2008,
approximately $0.9 million remained unpaid, of which $0.4 million was recorded in other long-term
liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. All remaining restructuring reserves were
associated with future facility charges and will be paid over the remaining respective lease terms
through March 2011. The difference between the actual future rent payments and the restructuring
reserves will be recorded as operating expenses when incurred. During the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company had no new acquisition related restructuring charges. As
of December 31, 2007, approximately $1.6 million remained unpaid, of which $0.6 million was
recorded in other long-term liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheet.
Derivatives
Periodically, the Company uses derivatives to partially offset its market exposure to fluctuations
in foreign currencies. The Company does not enter into derivatives for speculative or trading
purposes. The Company uses foreign currency forward contracts to mitigate transaction gains and
losses generated by certain foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities. These
derivatives are carried at fair value with changes recorded in other income (expense). Changes in
the fair value of these derivatives are largely offset by re-measurement of the underlying assets
and liabilities. Cash flows from such hedges are classified as operating activities. These foreign
exchange forward contracts have maturities between one and two months.
The Company also uses foreign currency forward and/or option contracts to hedge certain forecasted
foreign currency transactions relating to operating expenses. These derivatives are designated as
cash flow hedges and have maturities of less than one year. The effective portion of the
derivatives gain or loss is initially reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive
income, and upon occurrence of the forecasted transaction, is subsequently reclassified into the
consolidated statements of operations line item to which the hedged transaction relates. The
Company records ineffectiveness of the hedging instruments, which was immaterial during the three
and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, in other income (expense) on its condensed
consolidated statements of operations. Cash flows from such hedges are classified as operating
activities.
Debt
Senior Convertible Notes
In 2003, the Company received $392.8 million of net proceeds from an offering of $400.0 million
aggregate principal amount of Zero Coupon Convertible Senior Notes due June 15, 2008 (the Senior
Notes) which were converted into shares of its common stock by the holders during the three months
ended June 30, 2008. The Senior Notes were senior unsecured obligations, ranked on parity in right
of payment with all of the Companys existing and future senior unsecured debt, and ranked senior
to all of the Companys existing and future debt that expressly provided that it was subordinated
to the notes. The Senior Notes bore no interest, but were convertible into shares of the Companys
common stock, subject to certain conditions, at any time prior to maturity or their prior
repurchase
13
by the Company. The conversion rate was 49.6512 shares per each $1,000 principal amount of
convertible notes, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. This was equivalent to a
conversion price of approximately $20.14 per share. The holders of Senior Notes with a face value
of approximately $0.5 million had converted these notes prior to maturity into shares of the
Companys common stock as of December 31, 2007. As of June 16, 2008, holders of approximately
$399.2 million in aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes had converted these notes into
approximately 19.8 million shares of the Companys common stock. The Company settled the remaining
Senior Notes, with a face value of $0.3 million principal amount at maturity, for cash. As of June
30, 2008, all of the Companys Senior Notes were retired.
The carrying amounts and fair values of the Companys Zero Coupon Convertible Senior Notes (Senior
Notes) were (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
Carrying amount |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
399.5 |
|
Fair value |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
659.2 |
|
Distributor Financing Arrangement
The Company recognized the sales of accounts receivable to a financing provider according to FASB
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 125. The
Company introduced its distributor financing program in 2006 to strengthen its channel business by
promoting greater distributor volume and improved customer service. The program does not, and is
not intended to affect the timing of revenue recognition because the Company only recognizes
revenue upon sell-through. Under the financing arrangements, the proceeds from the financing
provider are due to the Company 30 days from the sale of the receivable. The Company pays the
financing provider a financing fee based on the spread over LIBOR or SIBOR. In these transactions
with a major financing provider, the Company has surrendered control over the transferred assets.
The accounts receivable have been isolated from the Company and put beyond the reach of creditors,
even in the event of bankruptcy. The purchaser of the accounts receivable balances has the right to
pledge or exchange the assets transferred. The Company does not maintain effective control over the
transferred assets through obligations or rights to redeem, transfer or repurchase the receivables
after they have been transferred.
Pursuant to the receivable financing arrangements for the sale of receivables, the Company sold net
receivables of $108.2 million and $20.0 million during the three months ended June 30, 2008, and
2007, respectively, and $167.0 million and $38.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008,
and 2007, respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2008, and 2007, the Company received
cash proceeds, net of the financing fee, of $77.8 million and $18.1 million, respectively, and
$132.1 million and $35.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The amounts owing by the financing provider recorded as accounts receivable on the Companys
condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, were $70.2 million
and $40.4 million, respectively.
The Company has determined that the portion of the receivable financed that has not been recognized
as revenue should be accounted for as a financing pursuant to FASB Emerging Issues Task Force Issue
88-18, Sales of Future Revenues. As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the estimated amounts
of cash received from the financing provider that has not been recognized as revenue from its
distributors was $12.7 million and $10.0 million, respectively.
14
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income consists of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
120.4 |
|
|
$ |
86.2 |
|
|
$ |
230.8 |
|
|
$ |
152.8 |
|
Change in net unrealized
gains (losses) on
investments, net of tax of
nil |
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
5.7 |
|
Change in foreign currency
translation adjustment, net
of tax of nil |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
114.9 |
|
|
$ |
93.3 |
|
|
$ |
228.3 |
|
|
$ |
162.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Deficit
The following table summarizes the activity in the Companys accumulated deficit account (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
(2,813.3 |
) |
Retirement of common stock (see Note 6) |
|
|
(121.3 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
230.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
(2,703.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
Amortization of stock-based compensation was included in the following cost and expense categories
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cost of revenues Product |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
Cost of revenues Service |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
22.2 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
27.3 |
|
|
$ |
21.5 |
|
|
$ |
50.1 |
|
|
$ |
47.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Charges, Net
Other charges recognized consisted of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Restructuring adjustments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
Acquisition related compensation charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Stock option investigation costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Tax related charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
Loss on litigation settlement |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
9.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
9.0 |
|
|
$ |
14.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the three months ended June 30, 2008, the Company accrued $9.0 million for the potential
settlement of its derivative lawsuits. See Note 9 Commitments and Contingencies under Legal
Proceedings.
In conjunction with various acquisitions, the Company accrued for acquisition related restructuring
charges primarily related to severance and facility charges. The Company had no adjustments to its
existing acquisition related restructuring reserves for the three and six months ended June 30,
2008, and recorded a $0.3 million adjustment to its acquisition related restructuring reserves for
facility related charges in the three and six months ended June 30, 2007.
In connection with a past acquisition, the Company recorded bonus obligation of $0.3 million and
$0.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively.
15
In the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company incurred $1.3 million and $6.0
million, respectively, in professional fees for the costs of external service providers used in the
completion of its internal stock option investigation.
On March 12, 2007, the Company commenced a tender offer to amend certain options granted under the
Juniper Networks, Inc. Amended & Restated 1996 Stock Plan and the Juniper Networks, Inc. 2000
Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan that had original exercise prices per share that were less than the
fair market value per share of the common stock underlying the option on the options grant date,
as determined by the Company for financial accounting purposes. Under this tender offer, employees
subject to taxation in the United States and Canada had the opportunity to increase their strike
price on affected options to the appropriate fair market value per share on the date of grant so as
to avoid unfavorable tax consequences under United States Internal Revenue Code Section 409A or
applicable Canadian tax laws and regulations. In exchange for increasing the strike price of these
options, the Company committed to make a cash payment to employees participating in the offer so as
to make employees whole for the incremental strike price as compared to their original option
exercise price. In connection with the offer, the Company amended options to purchase 4.3 million
shares of the Companys common stock and committed to make aggregate cash payments of $7.6 million
to offer participants. The Company accrued nil and $7.6 million in the three and six months ended
June 30, 2007, respectively.
In addition, the Company entered into a separate agreement with two executives in the three months
ended June 30, 2007, to amend their unexercised stock options covering 0.1 million shares of the
Companys common stock in order to cure the 409A issue associated with such options. As a result,
the Company committed to make aggregate cash payments of approximately $0.4 million and recorded
this payment liability in operating expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007.
Interest and Other Income, Net
Interest and other income, net, consist of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Interest income and expense, net |
|
$ |
13.5 |
|
|
$ |
26.6 |
|
|
$ |
31.8 |
|
|
$ |
59.5 |
|
Other income and expense, net |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest and other income, net |
|
$ |
13.2 |
|
|
$ |
25.5 |
|
|
$ |
30.8 |
|
|
$ |
58.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 5. Net Income per Share
The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted net income per share (in
millions, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
120.4 |
|
|
$ |
86.2 |
|
|
$ |
230.8 |
|
|
$ |
152.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for
basic net income per
share |
|
|
529.0 |
|
|
|
544.2 |
|
|
|
526.4 |
|
|
|
556.8 |
|
Shares issuable upon
conversion of the
Senior Notes |
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
Employee stock awards |
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for
diluted net income
per share |
|
|
559.3 |
|
|
|
580.7 |
|
|
|
561.6 |
|
|
|
592.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock awards for approximately 22.9 million shares and 18.7 million shares of the
Companys common stock in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, were
outstanding, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because their
effect would have been anti-dilutive. For the three and six
16
months ended June 30, 2007, approximately 37.0 million and 50.4 million shares of the Companys
common stock equivalents, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted earnings
per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
Note 6. Stockholders Equity
Stock Repurchase Activities
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company repurchased $121.3 million, or 4.7 million
shares of its common stock via open market purchases under two stock repurchase programs that were
authorized by its Board of Directors.
Under the $2.0 billion stock repurchase program approved in 2006 and 2007 (the 2006 Stock
Repurchase Program), the Company repurchased approximately 2.2 million shares of its common stock
at an average price of $24.61 per share for a total purchase price of $53.1 million during the
three months ended March 31, 2008. No shares were repurchased under this program during the second
quarter of 2008. As of June 30, 2008, the Company has repurchased and retired approximately 71.6
million shares of its common stock under the 2006 Stock Repurchase Program at an average price of
$23.41 per share, and the program had remaining authorized funds of $323.8 million.
The Board of Directors approved another $1.0 billion stock repurchase program in March 2008 (the
2008 Stock Repurchase Program). Under this program, the Company repurchased approximately 2.5
million shares of its common stock at an average price of $26.84 per share for a total purchase
price of $68.2 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008. As of June 30, 2008,
the 2008 Stock Repurchase Program had remaining authorized funds of $931.8 million.
All shares of common stock purchased under the 2006 and 2008 Stock Repurchase Programs have been
retired. Share repurchases under the Companys stock repurchase programs will be subject to a
review of the circumstances in place at the time and will be made from time to time in private
transactions or open market purchases as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements.
These programs may be discontinued at any time.
Stock Option Plans
2006 Equity Incentive Plan
On May 18, 2006, the Companys stockholders adopted the Companys 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the
2006 Plan) to enable the granting of incentive stock options, nonstatutory stock options, RSUs,
restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, performance units, deferred stock
units and dividend equivalents to the employees and consultants of the Company. The 2006 Plan also
provides for the automatic, non-discretionary award of nonstatutory stock options to the Companys
non-employee members of the Board.
The maximum aggregate number of shares authorized under the 2006 Plan is 64,500,000 shares of
common stock, plus the addition of any shares subject to outstanding options under the Companys
Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Plan (the 1996 Plan) and the Companys 2000 Nonstatutory Stock
Option Plan (the 2000 Plan) that subsequently expired unexercised after May 18, 2006 up to a
maximum of 75,000,000 additional shares of the common stock.
Options granted under the 2006 Plan have a maximum term of five to seven years from the grant date,
and generally vest and become exercisable over a four-year period. Restricted stock, performance
shares, RSUs or deferred stock units that vest solely based on continuing employment or provision
of services will vest in full no earlier than the three-year anniversary of the grant date. In the
event vesting is based on factors other than continued future provision of services, such awards
will vest in full no earlier than the one-year anniversary of the grant date.
The 2006 Plan provides each non-employee director an automatic grant of an option to purchase
50,000 shares of common stock upon the date on which such individual first becomes a director,
whether through election by the stockholders of the Company or appointment by the Board to fill a
vacancy (the First Option). In addition, at each
17
of the Companys annual stockholder meetings (i) each non-employee director who was a non-employee
director on the date of the prior years annual stockholder meeting shall be automatically granted
an option to purchase 20,000 shares of common stock, and (ii) each non-employee director who was
not a non-employee director on the date of the prior years annual stockholder meeting shall
receive an option to purchase a pro-rata portion of the 20,000 shares of the common stock
determined by the time elapsed since the individuals First Option grant (the Annual Option). The
First Option vests monthly over approximately three years from the grant date subject to the
non-employee directors continuous service on the Board. The Annual Option shall vest monthly over
approximately one year from the grant date subject to the non-employee directors continuous
service on the Board. Under the 2006 Plan, options granted to non-employee directors have a maximum
term of seven years.
2000 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan
In July 2000, the Board adopted the Juniper Networks 2000 Plan. The 2000 Plan provided for the
granting of nonstatutory stock options to employees, directors and consultants. Options granted
under the 2000 Plan generally become exercisable over a four-year period beginning on the date of
grant and have a maximum term of ten years. The Company had authorized 90,901,437 shares of common
stock for issuance under the 2000 Plan. Effective May 18, 2006, additional equity awards under the
2000 Plan have been discontinued and new equity awards are being granted under the 2006 Plan.
Remaining authorized shares under the 2000 Plan that were not subject to outstanding awards as of
May 18, 2006, were canceled on May 18, 2006. The 2000 Plan will remain in effect as to outstanding
equity awards granted under the plan prior to May 18, 2006.
Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Plan
The 1996 Plan provided for the granting of incentive stock options to employees and nonstatutory
stock options to employees, directors and consultants. On November 3, 2005, the Board adopted an
amendment to the 1996 Plan to add the ability to issue RSUs under the 1996 Plan. Options granted
under the 1996 Plan generally become exercisable over a four-year period beginning on the date of
grant and have a maximum term of ten years. The Company had authorized 164,623,039 shares of common
stock for issuance under the 1996 Plan. Effective May 18, 2006, additional equity awards under the
1996 Plan have been discontinued and new equity awards are being granted under the 2006 Plan.
Remaining authorized shares under the 1996 Plan that were not subject to outstanding awards as of
May 18, 2006 were canceled on May 18, 2006. The 1996 Plan will remain in effect as to outstanding
equity awards granted under the plan prior to May 18, 2006.
Plans Assumed Upon Acquisition
In connection with past acquisitions, the Company assumed options and restricted stock under the
stock plans of the acquired companies. The Company exchanged those options and restricted stock for
Juniper Networks options and restricted stock and, in the case of the options, authorized the
appropriate number of shares of common stock for issuance pursuant to those options. As of June 30,
2008, there were approximately 3.2 million common shares subject to outstanding awards under plans
assumed through past acquisitions. There was no restricted stock subject to repurchase as of June
30, 2008 and December 31, 2007. There were no restricted stock repurchases during the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
Equity Award Activities
In the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company granted RSUs covering 0.1 million
shares and 0.9 million shares, respectively, of common stock to its employees under the 2006 Plan.
The Company also granted performance share awards to eligible executives covering up to 0.1 million
and 0.6 million shares of common stock in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008,
respectively, that vest in March 2011 provided certain annual performance targets and other vesting
criteria are met. RSUs generally vest over a period of three or four years from the date of grant.
Until vested, RSUs and performance share awards do not have the voting rights of common stock and
the shares underlying the awards are not considered issued and outstanding. No restricted stock was
issued in the same periods during 2008. The Company expenses the cost of the RSUs, which is
determined to be the fair market value of the shares of the Companys common stock at the date of
grant, ratably over the period during which the restrictions lapse. The Company estimated the stock
compensation expense for its performance share awards based on the vesting criteria and only
recognized stock compensation expense for the portions of such
18
awards for which annual targets have been set. The Company accrued stock compensation expense of
$0.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, and $0.1 million and $0.2 million
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively, in connection with such performance
shares. In addition to RSUs and performance share awards, the Company also granted stock options
covering 1.9 million shares and 8.3 million shares of common stock under the 2006 Plan in the three
and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.
Net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, included pre-tax stock-based
compensation expense of $27.3 million and $50.1 million, respectively, related to stock options,
RSUs, performance share awards and employee stock purchases under the Companys 1999 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan reflecting the fair value recognition provisions under SFAS 123R. Net income for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2007, included pre-tax stock-based compensation expense of
$21.5 million and $47.4 million, respectively, related to stock options, RSUs, performance share
awards, and employee stock purchases reflecting the fair value recognition provisions under SFAS
123R.
A summary of the Companys equity award activity and related information for the six months ended
June 30, 2008, is set forth in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
Available |
|
Number of |
|
Exercise |
|
Contractual |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
For Grant(1) |
|
Shares |
|
Price |
|
Term |
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
(In thousands) |
|
(In dollars) |
|
(In years) |
|
(In thousands) |
Balance at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
46,022 |
|
|
|
66,928 |
|
|
$ |
20.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSUs and performance
share awards granted (2) |
|
|
(3,202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted |
|
|
(8,296 |
) |
|
|
8,296 |
|
|
|
25.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSUs canceled (2) |
|
|
824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options canceled (3) |
|
|
1,318 |
|
|
|
(1,326 |
) |
|
|
20.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,901 |
) |
|
|
15.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options expired (3) |
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
(527 |
) |
|
|
29.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008 (4) |
|
|
37,182 |
|
|
|
69,470 |
|
|
$ |
21.19 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
$ |
262,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Shares available for grant under the 2006 Plan. |
|
(2) |
|
RSUs and performance share awards with a per share or unit purchase price lower than 100% of
the fair market value of the Companys common stock on the day of the grant under the 2006
Plan are counted against shares authorized under the plan as two and one-tenth shares of
common stock for each share subject to such award. The Company granted RSUs and performance
share awards covering approximately 0.1 million and 1.5 million shares of common stock in the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
Canceled or expired options under the 1996 Plan and the 2000 Plan and the stock plans of the
acquired companies are no longer available for future grant under such plans, except for
shares subject to outstanding options under the 1996 Plan and the 2000 Plan that subsequently
expired unexercised after May 18, 2006, up to a maximum of 75,000,000 additional shares of
common stock, become available for grant under the 2006 Plan. |
|
(4) |
|
Outstanding options covering 69.5 million shares of common stock do not include RSUs and
performance share awards outstanding as of June 30, 2008. See details under Restricted Stock
Units and Performance Share Awards Activities below. |
19
A summary of the Companys vested or expected-to-vest options and exercisable options as of June
30, 2008, is set forth in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Exercise |
|
Contractual |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Shares |
|
Price |
|
Term |
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
(In dollars) |
|
(In years) |
|
(In thousands) |
Vested or expected-to-vest options |
|
|
63,058 |
|
|
$ |
21.06 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
$ |
248,385 |
|
Exercisable options |
|
|
45,478 |
|
|
|
20.20 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
215,832 |
|
As of June 30, 2008, options covering approximately 45.5 million shares of common stock were
exercisable at a weighted-average exercise price of $20.20 per share. As of December 31, 2007,
options covering approximately 44.8 million shares of common stock were exercisable at a
weighted-average exercise price of $20.01 per share.
Aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the Companys closing stock price on
the last trading day of the fiscal period, which was $22.18 as of June 30, 2008, and the exercise
price multiplied by the number of related options. The pre-tax intrinsic value of options
exercised, representing the difference between the fair market value of the Companys common stock
on the date of the exercise and the exercise price of each option, was $27.0 million and $47.5
million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.
Total fair value of options vested for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, was $14.0
million and $37.1 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2008, approximately $146.7 million of
unrecognized compensation cost, adjusted for estimated forfeitures, related to non-vested stock
options is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 3 years.
Restricted Stock Units and Performance Share Awards Activities
The following schedule summarizes information about the Companys RSUs and performance share awards
for the six months ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding RSUs and Performance Share Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Grant Date |
|
Contractual |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value |
|
Term |
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
(In dollars) |
|
(In years) |
|
(In thousands) |
Balance at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
6,284 |
|
|
$ |
22.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSUs and performance share awards granted |
|
|
1,525 |
|
|
|
25.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSUs and performance share awards vested |
|
|
(1,448 |
) |
|
|
18.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSUs and performance share awards canceled |
|
|
(445 |
) |
|
|
20.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
5,916 |
|
|
$ |
24.16 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
131,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average grant date fair value of RSUs granted during the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008, was $24.79 per share and $25.24 per share, respectively, and was $21.36 per share
and $18.50 per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively. The
weighted-average grant date fair value of performance share awards granted during the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008, was $24.48 per share and $25.10 per share, respectively, and was $18.27
per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively. As of June 30, 2008,
approximately $74.1 million of unrecognized compensation cost, adjusted for estimated forfeitures,
related to non-vested RSUs and non-vested performance share awards is expected to be recognized
over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.5 years.
20
The following schedule summarizes information about the Companys RSUs and performance share awards
as of June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Exercise |
|
Contractual |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Shares |
|
Price |
|
Term |
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
(In dollars) |
|
(In years) |
|
(In thousands) |
Shares subject to
outstanding RSUs
and performance
share awards |
|
|
5,916 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
131,206 |
|
Vested and
expected-to-vest
RSUs and
performance share
awards |
|
|
4,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
92,213 |
|
Approximately 0.1 million RSUs and 1.4 million RSUs, respectively, became vested and exercisable
during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. There were no RSUs vested during
the three and six months ended June 30, 2007.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
In April 1999, the Board of Directors approved the adoption of Juniper Networks 1999 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (the 1999 Purchase Plan). The 1999 Purchase Plan permits eligible employees to
acquire shares of the Companys common stock through periodic payroll deductions of up to 10% of
base compensation. Each employee may purchase no more than 6,000 shares in any twelve-month period,
and in no event may an employee purchase more than $25,000 worth of stock, determined at the fair
market value of the shares at the time such option is granted, in one calendar year. The 1999
Purchase Plan is implemented in a series of offering periods, each six months in duration, or a
shorter period as determined by the Board. The price at which the common stock may be purchased is
85% of the lesser of the fair market value of the Companys common stock on the first or last
trading day of the applicable offering period. Employees purchased approximately 0.7 million shares
of common stock through the 1999 Purchase Plan at an average price of $23.08 per share in the six
months ended June 30, 2008. There were no employee purchases under the 1999 Purchase Plan due to
the suspension of the Purchase Plan from August 2006 through March 2007. In connection with the
1999 Purchase Plan, compensation expense of $3.1 million and $6.6 million was recorded in operating
expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, and $2.3 million for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2007. No compensation expense was recorded in the first quarter of 2007 due
to the temporary suspension of the 1999 Purchase Plan. As of June 30, 2008, approximately 7.9
million shares had been issued since inception and the 13.1 million shares remained available for
future issuance under the 1999 Purchase Plan. The 1999 Purchase Plan will be discontinued effective
February 1, 2009.
In May 2008, the Companys stockholders approved the adoption of Juniper Networks 2008 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan (the 2008 Purchase Plan). The 2008 Purchase Plan was adopted to replace the
1999 Purchase Plan, which will be terminated immediately following the conclusion of the offering
period ending January 30, 2009. The Board has reserved an aggregate of 12,000,000 shares of the
Companys common stock for issuance under the 2008 Purchase Plan. The 2008 Purchase Plan is
generally similar to the 1999 Purchase Plan, except that under the 2008 Purchase Plan any increases
to the number of shares reserved for issuance must be approved by the Companys stockholders. The
first offering period of the 2008 Purchase Plan will commence on the first trading day on or after
February 1, 2009.
Common Stock Reserved for Future Issuance
As of June 30, 2008, the Company had reserved an aggregate of approximately 125.7 million shares of
common stock for future issuance under its stock option plans and the 1999 Purchase Plan.
Valuation of Stock-Based Compensation
SFAS 123R requires the use of a valuation technique, such as an option-pricing model, to calculate
the fair value of stock-based awards. The Company has elected to use the Black-Scholes-Merton
option-pricing model, which incorporates various assumptions including volatility, expected life,
and risk-free interest rates. The expected volatility is based on the implied volatility of market
traded options on the Companys common stock, adjusted for
21
other relevant factors including historical volatility of the Companys common stock over the most
recent period commensurate with the estimated expected life of the Companys stock options. The
expected life of an award is based on historical experience and on the terms and conditions of the
stock awards granted to employees, as well as the potential effect from options that had not been
exercised at the time.
Since 2006, the Company has granted stock option awards that have a maximum contractual life of
seven years from the date of grant. Prior to 2006, stock option awards generally had a ten-year
contractual life from the date of grant.
In 2007, the government of India implemented a new fringe benefit tax that applies to equity awards
granted to India taxpayers. This fringe benefit tax is payable by the issuer of the equity awards;
however, the law allows an issuer to recover from individual award holders the fringe benefit taxes
the issuer paid on their applicable equity awards. Beginning in January 2008, the Company amended
its equity award agreements for future grants made to its employees in India to provide for the
Company to be reimbursed for fringe benefit taxes paid in relation to applicable equity awards. The
Company has elected to use a Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model that incorporates a Monte
Carlo simulation to calculate the fair value of stock-based awards issued under the amended equity
award agreements. The assumptions used in this valuation are included below.
The assumptions used and the resulting estimates of fair value or weighted-average fair value per
share of awards granted and employee stock purchases under the Purchase Plan during those periods
were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Employee Stock Options: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volatility factor |
|
|
43% - 46 |
% |
|
|
34% - 35 |
% |
|
|
43% - 48 |
% |
|
|
34% - 40 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
1.7% - 4.0 |
% |
|
|
4.6% - 5.1 |
% |
|
|
1.7% -4.4 |
% |
|
|
4.5% - 5.1 |
% |
Expected life (years) |
|
|
3.6 - 5.7 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
3.6 - 5.7 |
|
|
|
3.6 - 3.7 |
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value per share |
|
$ |
8.32 - $10.60 |
|
|
$ |
6.67 - $8.37 |
|
|
$ |
8.32 - $10.88 |
|
|
$ |
6.42 - $8.37 |
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volatility factor |
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
Expected life (years) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average fair value per share |
|
$ |
7.83 |
|
|
$ |
4.75 |
|
|
$ |
7.83 |
|
|
$ |
4.75 |
|
Note 7. Segments
The Companys chief operating decision maker (CODM) allocates resources and assesses performance
based on financial information by the Companys business groups. In the first quarter of 2008, the
Company realigned its organizational structure to include its Service business as a component of
the related Infrastructure or SLT business groups. Accordingly, the previously reported Service
segment has been combined into the Companys two reportable segments as follows: Infrastructure and
SLT. The Infrastructure segment includes products from the E-, M-, MX-, and T-series router product
families, EX-series switching products, as well as the circuit-to-packet products. The SLT segment
consists primarily of Firewall virtual private network (Firewall) systems and appliances, secure
sockets layer virtual private network (SSL) appliances, intrusion detection and prevention
appliances (IDP), the J-series router product family and wide area network (WAN) optimization
platforms.
The primary financial measure used by the CODM in assessing performance of the segments is segment
operating income, which includes certain cost of revenues, research and development expenses, sales
and marketing expenses, and general and administrative expenses. In the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008, the CODM did not allocate certain miscellaneous expenses to its segments even though
such expenses were included in the Companys management operating income.
For arrangements with both Infrastructure and SLT products and services, revenue is attributed to
the segment based on the underlying purchase order, contract or sell-through report. Direct costs
and operating expenses, such as standard costs, research and development and product marketing
expenses, are generally applied to each segment. Indirect costs, such as manufacturing overhead and
other cost of sales, are allocated based on standard costs. Indirect
22
operating expenses, such as sales, marketing, business development, and general and administrative
expenses are generally allocated to each segment based on factors including headcount, usage and
revenue. The CODM does not allocate stock-based compensation, amortization of purchased intangible
assets, impairment, gain or loss on minority equity investments, interest income and expense, other
income and expense, income taxes, as well as certain other charges to the segments.
Further changes to this organizational structure may result in changes to the segments disclosed.
The Company has restated the previously reported segment revenues and segment operating results to
reflect the changes in its segments. Financial information for each segment used by the CODM is
summarized as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 (1) |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 (1) |
|
Net revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infrastructure: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
$ |
575.9 |
|
|
$ |
402.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,104.6 |
|
|
$ |
788.1 |
|
Service |
|
|
96.5 |
|
|
|
78.0 |
|
|
|
189.7 |
|
|
|
153.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Infrastructure revenues |
|
|
672.4 |
|
|
|
480.9 |
|
|
|
1,294.3 |
|
|
|
941.7 |
|
Service Layer Technologies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
|
148.0 |
|
|
|
138.8 |
|
|
|
293.5 |
|
|
|
263.4 |
|
Service |
|
|
58.6 |
|
|
|
45.2 |
|
|
|
114.1 |
|
|
|
86.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Service Layer Technologies revenues |
|
|
206.6 |
|
|
|
184.0 |
|
|
|
407.6 |
|
|
|
350.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues |
|
|
879.0 |
|
|
|
664.9 |
|
|
|
1,701.9 |
|
|
|
1,291.9 |
|
Operating income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infrastructure |
|
|
195.1 |
|
|
|
133.5 |
|
|
|
386.6 |
|
|
|
259.4 |
|
Service Layer Technologies |
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating income |
|
|
207.4 |
|
|
|
135.5 |
|
|
|
405.1 |
|
|
|
258.6 |
|
Other corporate (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total management operating income |
|
|
207.4 |
|
|
|
135.5 |
|
|
|
400.4 |
|
|
|
258.6 |
|
Amortization of purchased intangible assets |
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
|
|
(24.1 |
) |
|
|
(35.9 |
) |
|
|
(48.2 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
(27.3 |
) |
|
|
(21.5 |
) |
|
|
(50.1 |
) |
|
|
(47.4 |
) |
Stock-based payroll tax expense |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
Other charges, net |
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income |
|
|
160.5 |
|
|
|
86.2 |
|
|
|
303.1 |
|
|
|
146.7 |
|
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
32.3 |
|
|
|
29.3 |
|
|
|
65.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
172.1 |
|
|
$ |
118.5 |
|
|
$ |
332.4 |
|
|
$ |
211.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Prior period amounts have been reclassified to reflect the 2008 segment structure, which now
includes service revenue and operating results in the Infrastructure and SLT segments. |
|
(2) |
|
Other corporate represents miscellaneous expenses that have not been allocated to segment
operating results. |
Depreciation expense allocated to the Infrastructure segment was $21.4 million and $41.6 million,
in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, and $17.7 million and $33.3 million,
in the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively. The depreciation expense allocated
to the SLT segment was $9.6 million and $18.3 million in the three and six months ended June 30,
2008, respectively, and $7.1 million and $13.7 million in the three and six months ended June 30,
2007, respectively.
23
The Company attributes sales to geographic region based on the customers ship-to location. The
following table shows net revenues by geographic region (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Americas: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
325.3 |
|
|
$ |
289.7 |
|
|
$ |
713.4 |
|
|
$ |
569.2 |
|
Other |
|
|
63.3 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
|
|
|
93.2 |
|
|
|
41.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Americas |
|
|
388.6 |
|
|
|
315.2 |
|
|
|
806.6 |
|
|
|
610.6 |
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa |
|
|
285.6 |
|
|
|
197.8 |
|
|
|
525.7 |
|
|
|
407.2 |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
|
204.8 |
|
|
|
151.9 |
|
|
|
369.6 |
|
|
|
274.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
879.0 |
|
|
$ |
664.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,701.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,291.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Siemens Networks B.V. (NSN) accounted for 10.4% of the Companys net revenues for the
three months ended June 30, 2008, and no single customer accounted for 10.0% or more of the
Companys net revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2008. NSN accounted for 17.7% of the
Companys net revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2007, and NSN and Verizon
Communications, Inc. (Verizon) individually accounted for 14.7% and 10.7%, respectively, of the
Companys net revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The revenue attributed to each
significant customer was derived from the sale of products and services in both segments.
The Company tracks assets by physical location. The majority of the Companys assets, including
property and equipment, were attributable to its U.S. operations as of June 30, 2008, and December
31, 2007. Although management reviews asset information on a corporate level and allocates
depreciation expense by segment, the CODM does not review asset information on a segment basis.
Note 8. Income Taxes
The Company recorded tax provisions of $51.7 million and $32.3 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007, or effective tax rates of 30% and 27%, respectively. The Company recorded
tax provisions of $101.7 million and $59.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
or effective tax rates of 31% and 28%, respectively. The effective tax rates for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008, differ from the federal statutory rate of 35% and the rate for the same
periods in 2007 primarily due to earnings in foreign jurisdictions which are subject to lower rates
and a reduced benefit from tax credits due to the expiration of the federal research and
development credit law at December 31, 2007. The Companys income taxes payable for federal and
state purposes were reduced by the tax benefit from employee stock option transactions. This
benefit totaled $14.6 million and $19.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008,
respectively, and was reflected as an increase to additional paid-in capital.
The Company is currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for the 2004 tax
year, the German tax authorities for the 2005 tax year, and the Indian authorities for the 2004 and
2005 tax years. Additionally, the Company has not reached final resolution with the IRS on an
adjustment it proposed for the 1999 and 2000 tax years. The Company was not under examination by
any other major jurisdictions in which the Company files its income tax returns as of June 30,
2008. Although the timing of the resolution and/or closure of any audits is highly uncertain, it is
reasonably possible that the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits could significantly change
in the next 12 months. However, given the number of years remaining subject to examination and the
number of matters being examined, the Company is unable to estimate the range of possible
adjustments to the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits.
The gross unrecognized tax benefits increased by approximately $6.2 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2008, of which $5.2 million, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate.
Interest and penalties accrued for the same period were immaterial.
24
Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
The following table summarizes the Companys principal contractual obligations as of June 30, 2008
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Other |
|
Operating leases |
|
$ |
227.8 |
|
|
$ |
28.1 |
|
|
$ |
50.1 |
|
|
$ |
46.0 |
|
|
$ |
38.8 |
|
|
$ |
32.6 |
|
|
$ |
32.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Sublease rental income |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase commitments |
|
|
113.0 |
|
|
|
113.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax liabilities |
|
|
79.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79.3 |
|
Other contractual obligations |
|
|
65.7 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
483.6 |
|
|
$ |
159.6 |
|
|
$ |
74.5 |
|
|
$ |
54.5 |
|
|
$ |
44.1 |
|
|
$ |
37.7 |
|
|
$ |
33.9 |
|
|
$ |
79.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Leases
Juniper Networks leases its facilities under operating leases that expire at various times, the
longest of which expires in January 2017. Future minimum payments under the non-cancelable
operating leases, net of committed sublease income, totaled $225.6 million as of June 30, 2008.
Rent expense for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was $14.7 million and $11.3 million,
respectively, and $28.9 million and $22.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Senior Notes
As of June 16, 2008, holders of approximately $399.2 million in aggregate principal amount of
Senior Notes converted these notes into approximately 19.8 million shares of the Companys common
stock. The Company settled the remaining Senior Notes with a face value of $0.3 million principal
amount at maturity for cash. As of June 30, 2008, the Companys Senior Notes were retired.
Purchase Commitments
In order to reduce manufacturing lead times and ensure adequate component supply, contract
manufacturers utilized by the Company place non-cancelable, non-returnable (NCNR) orders for
components based on the Companys build forecasts. As of June 30, 2008, there were NCNR component
orders placed by the contract manufacturers with a value of $113.0 million. The contract
manufacturers use the components to build products based on the Companys forecasts and on purchase
orders the Company has received from customers. Generally, the Company does not own the components
and title to the products transfers from the contract manufacturers to the Company and immediately
to the Companys customers upon delivery at a designated shipment location. If the components go
unused or the products go unsold for specified periods of time, the Company may incur carrying
charges or obsolete materials charges for components that the contract manufacturers purchased to
build products to meet the Companys forecast or customer orders. As of June 30, 2008, the Company
had accrued $26.2 million based on its estimate of such charges.
Tax Liabilities
As of June 30, 2008, the company had $79.3 million included in long-term liabilities in the
condensed consolidated balance sheet for unrecognized tax positions. At this time, the Company is
unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of the timing of payments in individual years beyond
12 months due to uncertainties in the timing of tax audit outcomes.
25
Other Contractual Obligations
As of June 30, 2008, other contractual obligations consisted primarily of an indemnity-related
escrow amount of $2.3 million, a software subscription requiring payments of $5.0 million in
January 2009, and a joint development agreement for $24.5 million with quarterly payments of $3.5
million through January 2010. Additionally, in the second quarter of 2008, the Company entered into
a five year, $34.0 million data center hosting agreement requiring payments of $8.4 million in the
third quarter of 2008. The remaining commitment under this agreement is expected to be paid through
the end of April 2013. As of June 30, 2008, $34.0 million remained unpaid under the data center
hosting agreement.
Guarantees
The Company enters into agreements with customers that contain indemnification provisions relating
to potential situations where claims could be alleged that the Companys products infringe the
intellectual property rights of a third party. Other guarantees or indemnification arrangements
include guarantees of product and service performance and standby letters of credit for certain
lease facilities. The Company has not recorded a liability related to these guarantee and
indemnification provisions and these guarantees and indemnification arrangements have not had any
significant impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Legal Proceedings
The Company is subject to legal claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business,
such as employment or intellectual property claims, including the matters described below. The
outcome of any such matters is currently not determinable. Although the Company does not expect
that any such legal claims or litigation will ultimately have a material adverse effect on its
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows, an adverse result in one or
more matters could negatively affect the Companys results in the period in which they occur.
Federal Derivative Lawsuits
Between May 24, 2006 and August 17, 2006, seven purported shareholder derivative actions were filed
in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against the Company and
certain of its current and former officers and directors. The lawsuits allege that the Companys
officers and directors either participated in illegal back-dating of stock option grants or allowed
it to happen. On October 19, 2006, the Court ordered the consolidation of these actions as In Re
Juniper Derivative Actions, No. 06-03396, and appointed as the lead plaintiffs Timothy Hill,
Employer-Teamsters Local Nos. 175 & 505 Pension Trust Fund, and Indiana State District Council of
Laborers and HOD Carriers Pension Fund. Lead plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint on April 11,
2007. The consolidated complaint asserts causes of action for violations of federal securities
laws, violations of California securities laws, breaches of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting
breaches of fiduciary duty, abuse of control, corporate waste, breach of contract, unjust
enrichment, gross mismanagement, and insider selling and misappropriation of information. The
consolidated complaint also demands an accounting and rescission of allegedly improper stock option
grants. The Company formed a Special Litigation Committee, consisting of directors Michael Rose and
Michael Lawrie, to determine whether it is in the best interest of Juniper Networks and its
shareholders to pursue any of the claims asserted in the derivative litigation. The plaintiffs and
the Company have agreed in principle on a settlement of the federal derivative litigation and the
state derivative litigation discussed below, and any such settlements would require approval of the
court. The Company has accrued a $9 million expense in connection with these potential settlements.
The Special Litigation Committee is authorized to pursue, settle, or release such claims.
State Derivative Lawsuits California
On May 24 and June 2, 2006, two purported shareholder derivative actions were filed in the Santa
Clara County Superior Court in the State of California against the Company and certain of its
current and former officers and directors. These two actions were consolidated as In re Juniper
Networks Derivative Litigation, No. 1:06CV064294, by order dated June 20, 2006. An amended
consolidated complaint was filed on April 9, 2007. The amended consolidated complaint alleges that
certain of the Companys current and former officers and directors either participated in illegal
back-dating of stock options or allowed it to happen. The complaint asserts causes of action
26
for unjust enrichment, breach of fiduciary duties, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, waste of
corporate assets, insider selling and misappropriation of information, and violations of California
securities laws. Plaintiffs also demand an accounting and rescission of allegedly improper stock
options grants, and a constructive trust of proceeds derived from allegedly illicit stock options.
The Company formed a Special Litigation Committee, consisting of directors Michael Rose and Michael
Lawrie, to determine whether it is in the best interest of Juniper Networks and its shareholders to
pursue any of the claims asserted in the derivative litigation. The plaintiffs and the Company have
agreed in principle on a settlement of the federal derivative litigation discussed above and the
state derivative litigation and any such settlements would require approval of the court. The
Company has accrued a $9 million expense in connection with these potential settlements. The
Special Litigation Committee is authorized to pursue, settle, or release such claims.
Federal Securities Class Action
On July 14, 2006 and August 29, 2006, two purported class actions were filed in the Northern
District of California against the Company and certain of the Companys current and former officers
and directors. On November 20, 2006, the Court consolidated the two actions as In re Juniper
Networks, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. C06-04327-JW, and appointed the New York City Pension
Funds as lead plaintiffs. The lead plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Class Action Complaint on
January 12, 2007, and filed an Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint on April 9, 2007. The
Amended Consolidated Complaint alleges that the defendants violated federal securities laws by
manipulating stock option grant dates to coincide with low stock prices and issuing false and
misleading statements including, among others, incorrect financial statements due to the improper
accounting of stock option grants. The Amended Consolidated Complaint asserts claims for violations
of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of all persons who
purchased or otherwise acquired Juniper Networks publicly traded securities from July 12, 2001,
through and including August 10, 2006. On June 7, 2007, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss
certain of the claims, and a hearing was held on September 10, 2007. On March 31, 2008, the Court
issued an order granting in part and denying in part the defendants motion to dismiss. The order
dismissed with prejudice plaintiffs section 10(b) claim to the extent it was based on challenged
statements made before July 14, 2001. The order also dismissed, with leave to amend plaintiffs
section 10(b) claim against Pradeep Sindhu. The order upheld all of plaintiffs remaining claims.
The order gave plaintiffs until May 1, 2008, to file an amended complaint. Plaintiffs chose not to
amend their complaint. Defendants filed their answer on June 23, 2008.
Calamore Proxy Statement Action
On March 28, 2007, an action titled Jeanne M. Calamore v. Juniper Networks, Inc., et al., No.
C-07-1772-JW, was filed by Jeanne M. Calamore in the Northern District of California against the
Company and certain of the Companys current and former officers and directors. The complaint
alleges that the proxy statement for the Companys 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders contained
various false and misleading statements in that it failed to disclose stock option backdating
information. As a result, plaintiff seeks preliminary and permanent injunctive relief with respect
to the Companys 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, including seeking to invalidate the plan and all
equity awards granted and grantable thereunder. On May 21, 2007, the Company filed a motion to
dismiss and plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction. On July 19, 2007, the Court issued
an order denying plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction and dismissing the complaint in
its entirety with leave to amend. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on August 27, 2007, and the
defendants filed a motion to dismiss on October 9, 2007. Plaintiff filed her opposition on December
21, 2007, and defendants filed their reply on January 25, 2008. A hearing was held on February 11,
2008. The Court has not yet issued a ruling.
IPO Allocation Case
In December 2001, a class action complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York against the Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Credit Suisse First Boston
Corporation, FleetBoston Robertson Stephens, Inc., Royal Bank of Canada (Dain Rauscher Wessels), SG
Cowen Securities Corporation, UBS Warburg LLC (Warburg Dillon Read LLC), Chase (Hambrecht & Quist
LLC), J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Lehman Brothers, Inc., Salomon Smith Barney, Inc., Merrill Lynch,
Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated (collectively, the Underwriters), Juniper Networks and
certain of Juniper Networks officers. This action was brought on behalf of purchasers of the
Companys common stock in its initial public offering in June 1999 and the Companys secondary
offering in September 1999.
27
Specifically, among other things, this complaint alleged that the prospectus pursuant to which
shares of common stock were sold in the Companys initial public offering and the Companys
subsequent secondary offering contained certain false and misleading statements or omissions
regarding the practices of the Underwriters with respect to their allocation of shares of common
stock in these offerings and their receipt of commissions from customers related to such
allocations. Various plaintiffs have filed actions asserting similar allegations concerning the
initial public offerings of approximately 300 other issuers. These various cases pending in the
Southern District of New York have been coordinated for pretrial proceedings as In re Initial
Public Offering Securities Litigation, 21 MC 92. In April 2002, plaintiffs filed a consolidated
amended complaint in the action against the Company, alleging violations of the Securities Act of
1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Defendants in the coordinated proceeding filed
motions to dismiss. In October 2002, the Companys officers were dismissed from the case without
prejudice pursuant to a stipulation. On February 19, 2003, the court granted in part and denied in
part the motion to dismiss, but declined to dismiss the claims against the Company.
In June 2004, a stipulation of settlement and release of claims against the issuer defendants,
including the Company, was submitted to the court for approval. On August 31, 2005, the court
preliminarily approved the settlement. In December 2006, the appellate court overturned the
certification of classes in the six test cases that were selected by the underwriter defendants and
plaintiffs in the coordinated proceedings (the action involving the Company is not one of the six
test cases). Because class certification was a condition of the settlement, it was unlikely that
the settlement would receive final Court approval. On June 25, 2007, the Court entered an order
terminating the proposed settlement based upon a stipulation among the parties to the settlement.
Plaintiffs have filed amended master allegations and amended complaints and moved for class
certification in the six focus cases, which the defendants in those cases have opposed. On March
26, 2008, the Court largely denied the defendants motion to dismiss the amended complaints in the
six test cases.
16(b) Demand
On October 3, 2007, a purported Juniper Networks shareholder filed a complaint for violation of
Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which prohibits short-swing trading, against
the Companys IPO underwriters. The complaint, Vanessa Simmonds v. The Goldman Sachs Group, et al.,
Case No. C07-015777, in District Court for the Western District of Washington, seeks the recovery
of short-swing profits. The Company is named as a nominal defendant. No recovery is sought from the
Company in this matter.
IRS Notices of Proposed Adjustments
The IRS has concluded an audit of the Companys federal income tax returns for fiscal years 1999
and 2000. During 2004, the Company received a Notice of Proposed Adjustment (NOPA) from the IRS.
While the final resolution of the issues raised in the NOPA is uncertain, the Company does not
believe that the outcome of this matter will have a material adverse effect on the Companys
consolidated financial position or results of operations. The Company is also under routine
examination by certain state and non-US tax authorities. The Company believes that it has
adequately provided for any reasonably foreseeable outcome related to these audits.
In 2007, the IRS opened an examination of the Companys U.S. federal income tax and employment tax
returns for the 2004 fiscal year. Subsequently, the IRS extended their examination of the Companys
employment tax returns to include fiscal years 2005 and 2006. The Company has not yet received any
NOPAs related to these audits.
Note 10. Related Party Transactions
The Company reimburses its CEO, Mr. Scott Kriens, for ordinary operating costs relating to his use
of a personal aircraft for business purposes up to a maximum amount per year. The Company incurred
$0.1 million in related expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, and $0.1 million
and $0.2 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively.
28
Note 11. Subsequent Event
Stock Repurchases
Subsequent to June 30, 2008, through the filing of this report, the Company repurchased and retired
approximately 1.5 million shares of its common stock for approximately $35.2 million under the 2008
Stock Repurchase Program at an average purchase price of $23.40 per share. The Companys 2008 Stock
Repurchase Program had remaining authorized funds of $896.6 million as of the report filing date.
Purchases under the Companys stock repurchase programs are subject to a review of the
circumstances in place at the time and will be made from time to time as permitted by securities
laws and other legal requirements.
29
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Report), including the Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements regarding
future events and the future results of the Company that are based on current expectations,
estimates, forecasts, and projections about the industry in which the Company operates and the
beliefs and assumptions of the management of the Company. Words such as expects, anticipates,
targets, goals, projects, intends, plans, believes, seeks, estimates, variations of
such words, and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties and
assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual results may differ materially and
adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause or
contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in this Report
under the section entitled Risk Factors in Item 1A of Part II and elsewhere, and in other reports
the Company files with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), specifically the most recent
Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company undertakes no obligation to revise or update publicly any
forward-looking statements for any reason.
The following discussion is based upon our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
included elsewhere in this report, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. In the course of operating our business, we routinely make
decisions as to the timing of the payment of invoices, the collection of receivables, the
manufacturing and shipment of products, the fulfillment of orders, the purchase of supplies, and
the building of inventory and spare parts, among other matters. Each of these decisions has some
impact on the financial results for any given period. In making these decisions, we consider
various factors including contractual obligations, customer satisfaction, competition, internal and
external financial targets and expectations, and financial planning objectives. The preparation of
these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingencies. On
an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to sales returns, pricing
credits, warranty costs, allowance for doubtful accounts, impairment of long-term assets,
especially goodwill and intangible assets, contract manufacturer exposures for carrying and
obsolete material charges, assumptions used in the valuation of stock-based compensation, and
litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we
believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from
other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.
Overview of the Results of Operations
Executive Overview
To aid readers of our financial statements in understanding our operating results, we have provided
below an executive overview of the significant events that affected the most recent quarter and the
first half of our fiscal 2008 and a discussion of the nature of our operating expenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts and percentages) |
|
Total |
|
Segments |
Three months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
Consolidated |
|
Infrastructure |
|
SLT |
Net revenues |
|
$ |
879.0 |
|
|
$ |
672.4 |
|
|
$ |
206.6 |
|
Year-over-year net revenues increase |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
Segment operating income (1) |
|
$ |
207.4 |
|
|
$ |
195.1 |
|
|
$ |
12.3 |
|
Year-over-year segment operating income increase |
|
|
53 |
% |
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
N/M |
(2) |
Operating income (1) |
|
$ |
160.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-over-year operating income increase |
|
|
86 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
120.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-over-year net income increase |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts and percentages) |
|
Total |
|
Segments |
Six months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
Consolidated |
|
Infrastructure |
|
SLT |
Net revenues |
|
$ |
1,701.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,294.3 |
|
|
$ |
407.6 |
|
Year-over-year net revenues increase |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
Segment operating income (1) |
|
$ |
405.1 |
|
|
$ |
386.6 |
|
|
$ |
18.5 |
|
Year-over-year segment operating income increase |
|
|
57 |
% |
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
N/M |
(2) |
Operating income (1) |
|
$ |
303.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-over-year operating income increase |
|
|
107 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
230.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-over-year net income increase |
|
|
51 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Segment operating income excludes expenses for amortization of intangible assets, stock-based
compensation expense, stock-based payroll tax expense, and other charges, net; however, these
expenses are included in operating income. |
|
(2) |
|
N/M Not meaningful |
|
|
Net revenues: Our net revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, increased
32% from the same periods in 2007. We experienced growth in both Infrastructure and Service
Layer Technologies (SLT) revenues, which represented 76.5% and 23.5% of net revenues,
respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2008, and 76.1% and 23.9% of net revenues,
respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Our Infrastructure revenues increased
40% and 37% and SLT revenues increased 12% and 16%, in the three and six months ended June 30,
2008, respectively, in each case compared to the same periods in 2007. Our increases in
Infrastructure revenues were attributable to the growing acceptance of our router products and
services, including our MX-, T-, and M-series product families, in the service provider and
enterprise markets. We also experienced growth in our SLT products and services, including
firewall virtual private network (Firewall) and J-series product families, in the enterprise
and service provider markets, partially offset by declines in revenue from WX and DX products. |
|
|
|
Operating Margin: Our operating income increased $74.2 million and $156.4 million, or 86% and
107%, in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, to $160.5 million and $303.1 million,
respectively, compared to the same periods in 2007. Operating margin percentage was 18.3% and
17.8% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, as compared to 13.0% and 11.4% from
the same periods in 2007. This change was, in large part, due to a decrease in operating
expense as a percentage of net revenues due to our efforts to manage expenses and improve
efficiencies in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the same periods in
the prior year. |
|
|
|
Net Income and Net Income Per Share: Net income was $120.4 million and $230.8 million, or
$0.22 per share and $0.41 per share on a diluted basis in the three and six months ended June
30, 2008, respectively, compared to $86.2 million and $152.8 million, or $0.15 per share and
$0.26 per share on a diluted basis from the same periods in 2007. The increase was primarily
due to the revenue growth and the reduction in operating expenses, which were partially offset
by lower net interest and other income along with higher income tax expense in the 2008
period. |
|
|
|
Other Financial Highlights: Total deferred revenue increased $79.5 million in the six months
ended June 30, 2008, primarily due to the renewal of annual maintenance arrangements. During
the six months ended June 30, 2008, we generated $324.3 million resulting from cash provided
by our operating activities, which was partially offset by cash used in investing activities
and financing activities, which included the repurchase of $121.3 million of our common stock. |
31
Significant Events
Business and Market Environment
We design, develop and sell products and services that together provide our customers with
high-performance network infrastructure that creates responsive and trusted environments for
accelerating the deployment of services and applications over a single Internet Protocol
(IP)-based network. We serve the high-performance networking requirements of global service
providers, enterprises, governments and research and education institutions that view the network
as critical to their success. High-performance networking is designed to provide fast, reliable and
secure access to applications and services. We offer a high-performance network infrastructure that
includes best-in-class IP routing, Ethernet switching, security and application acceleration
solutions, as well as partnerships designed to extend the value of the network and worldwide
services and support designed to optimize customer investments.
In the first half of our fiscal 2008, we continued to deliver innovative, high-performance network
infrastructure solutions. For the service provider market, we announced an advanced mobile IP/MPLS
solution portfolio with the new BX 7000 multi-access gateway router for the cell site, M-series
circuit emulation physical interface cards for the aggregation site and a suite of software
features designed to simplify deployment, provisioning and management of mobile backhaul networks.
We also introduced the JCS 1200, a high-performance control plane scaling platform. In addition, we
announced three new line card families for the MX-series Ethernet Services Routes. These cards
known as Dense Port Concentrators or (DPC) provide physical interfaces for the MX-series. These
cards allow customers greater flexibility in network design with the MX-series by providing
connections to lower speed Ethernet platforms (10mb & 100mb), copper based infrastructures and by
combining a wide range of Ethernet speeds in a single chassis slot. For the enterprise market, we
introduced the EX-series, a family of Ethernet switches that leverage the operational simplicity
and carrier-class reliability of our JUNOS software. We also announced a new family of Intrusion
Detection and Prevention (IDP) appliances that deliver up to 10 Gbps real-world throughput and
performance to enable Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) appliance deployments in the network core,
the integration of services, including Firewall and chassis clustering into JUNOS software for
implementation on the J-series services router and the Security Threat Response Manager (STRM), a
platform capable of providing businesses with a centralized scalable and effective way to log and
manage a rapidly evolving threat landscape.
Changes to Segments
Beginning in January 2008, we realigned our reporting structure which resulted in two segments:
Infrastructure and SLT. The previously reported Service segment has been combined into the
following two segments:
|
|
Infrastructure: Our Infrastructure segment includes products and services related to the E-,
M-, MX- and T-series router product families, EX-series switching products, as well as the
circuit-to-packet products. |
|
|
|
SLT: Our SLT segment consists primarily of products and services related to our Firewall
systems and appliances, secure sockets layer virtual private network (SSL) appliances,
intrusion detection and prevention appliances (IDP), the J-series router product family and
wide area network (WAN) optimization platforms. |
Stock Repurchase Activity
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we repurchased $121.3 million or 4.7 million shares of
our common stock via open market purchases under two stock repurchase programs that were authorized
by our Board of Directors.
Under the $2.0 billion stock repurchase program approved in 2006 and 2007 (the 2006 Stock
Repurchase Program), we repurchased approximately 2.2 million shares of our common stock at an
average price of $24.61 per share for a total purchase price of $53.1 million during the three
months ended March 31, 2008. No shares were repurchased under this program during the second
quarter of 2008. As of June 30, 2008, we have repurchased and retired approximately 71.6 million
shares of our common stock under the 2006 Stock Repurchase Program at an average price of $23.41
per share, and the program had remaining authorized funds of $323.8 million
32
The Board of Directors approved another $1.0 billion stock repurchase program in March 2008 (the
2008 Stock Repurchase Program). Under this program, we repurchased approximately 2.5 million
shares of our common stock at an average price of $26.84 per share for a total purchase price of
$68.2 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008. As of June 30, 2008, the 2008
Stock Repurchase Program had remaining authorized funds of $931.8 million.
Subsequent to June 30, 2008, through the filing of this report, we have repurchased and retired
approximately 1.5 million shares of our common stock for approximately $35.2 million under the 2008
Stock Repurchase Program at an average price of $23.40 per share. The 2008 Stock Repurchase Program
had remaining authorized funds of $896.6 million as of the report filing date.
All shares of common stock purchased under the 2006 and 2008 Stock Repurchase Programs have been
retired. Share repurchases under our stock repurchase programs will be subject to a review of the
circumstances in place at the time and will be made from time to time in private transactions or
open market purchases as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements. These programs
may be discontinued at any time.
Backlog
Our sales are made primarily pursuant to purchase orders under framework agreements with our
customers. At any given time, we have orders for products that have not been shipped and for
services that have not yet been performed for various reasons. Because we believe industry practice
would allow customers to cancel or change orders with limited advance notice prior to shipment or
performance, as well as our own history of allowing such changes and cancellations, we do not
consider this backlog to be firm and do not believe our backlog information is necessarily
indicative of future revenue.
Manufacturing
Most of our manufacturing, repair and supply chain operations are outsourced to independent
contract manufacturers. Accordingly, most of our costs of revenues consist of payments to our
independent contract manufacturers for product costs. The independent contract manufacturers
produce our products using design specifications, quality assurance programs and standards that we
establish. Our independent contract manufacturers manufacture our products primarily in Canada,
China, Malaysia, and the United States. We have employees in our manufacturing and operations
organization who manage relationships with our contract manufacturers, manage our supply chain, and
monitor product testing and quality. We generally do not own the components and title to products
transfers from the contract manufacturers to us and immediately to our customers upon shipment.
The contract manufacturers procure components based on our build forecasts. If actual component
usage is lower than our forecasts, we may be and have been in the past, liable for carrying or
obsolete material charges.
In recent years, an increasing amount of our product has been manufactured in Asia, and we
anticipate that a larger percentage of our products will be produced outside the United States and
Canada in the future. Our contracts generally provide for passage of title and risk of loss at the
designated point of shipment to the customer. The manufacturing of products in Asia for shipment to
customers in EMEA and the Americas resulted in additional shipment logistics, freight and timing
issues for us and those customers. In an ongoing effort to balance our and the customers needs, we
have made changes on occasion to the payment of freight and the point of shipment with respect to
products shipped from Asia. These changes impact shipping costs and the timing of revenue
recognition of the affected shipments.
Nature of Expenses
Employee related costs have historically been the primary driver of our operating expenses and we
expect this trend to continue. These costs include items such as wages, commissions, bonuses,
vacation, benefits, stock-based compensation, and travel. We increased our headcount by 20% to
6,531 employees as of June 30, 2008, from 5,435 employees as of June 30, 2007, primarily in the
research and development, sales, and customer service organizations.
33
Stock-based compensation and related payroll tax expense was $28.6 million and $52.4 million in the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, and $23.6 million and $49.5 million in the
three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively. As of June 30, 2008, approximately $146.7
million of unrecognized stock-based compensation cost, adjusted for estimated forfeitures, related
to non-vested stock options is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
approximately 3 years. In addition, approximately $74.1 million of unrecognized stock-based
compensation cost, adjusted for estimated forfeitures, related to non-vested RSUs and non-vested
performance share awards is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
approximately 2.5 years.
Facility and information technology departmental costs are allocated to other departments based on
usage and headcount, respectively. Facility and information technology related cost increased by
$16.0 million and $37.2 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively,
compared to the same periods in 2007 due to an increase in headcount and the continued build-out of
our domestic and international development and test centers and applications to support our
internal operations. Facility and information technology related headcount was 256 employees as of
June 30, 2008, compared to 213 employees as of June 30, 2007. We expect to further invest in our
company-wide information technology infrastructure as we implement our operational excellence
initiatives.
Although our revenue transactions are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars, operating expenses are
denominated in U.S. dollars as well as other foreign currencies including the British Pound, the
Euro, Indian Rupee, and Japanese Yen. Changes in related currency exchange rates may affect our
operating results. Periodically, we use foreign currency forward and/or option contracts to hedge
certain forecasted foreign currency transactions relating to operating expenses. The effective
portion of the derivatives gain or loss is initially reported as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income and, upon occurrence of the forecasted transaction, is subsequently
reclassified into the condensed consolidated statements of operations line item to which the hedged
transaction relates. Any ineffectiveness of the hedging instruments is reported in other income
(expense) on our condensed consolidated statements of operations. The increase in expenses
including cost of revenues, research and development, sales and marketing, and general and
administrative expenses, due to foreign currency fluctuation, was approximately 3% in the three and
six months ended June 30, 2008, compared with the same periods in 2007.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities and equity at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
net revenues, costs and expenses in the reporting period. We regularly evaluate our estimates and
assumptions. We base our estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and
various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of
which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that
are not readily apparent from other sources. Our actual results may differ materially and adversely
from managements estimates. To the extent there are material differences between our estimates and
the actual results, our future operating results will be affected.
We believe the following critical accounting policies require us to make significant judgments and
estimates in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements:
|
|
Revenue Recognition; |
|
|
|
Contract Manufacturer Liabilities; |
|
|
|
Warranty Reserve; |
|
|
|
Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets; |
|
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation; |
|
|
|
Income Taxes; and |
|
|
|
Loss Contingencies. |
34
Fair Value Accounting
In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities-including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 expands the use
of fair value accounting to eligible financial assets and liabilities. SFAS 159 is effective
beginning on January 1, 2008. We evaluated our existing financial instruments and elected not to
adopt the fair value option on our financial instruments. As a result, SFAS 159 did not have any
impact on our financial condition or results of operations as of and for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008. However, because the SFAS 159 election is based on an instrument-by-instrument
election at the time we first recognize an eligible item or enter into an eligible firm commitment,
we may decide to exercise the option on new items when business reasons support doing so in the
future which may have a significant impact on our operating results.
Management believes that there have been no significant changes during the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008, to the items that we disclosed as our critical accounting policies and
estimates in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements in Item 1, Part I of this Form 10-Q for a full description of recent
accounting pronouncements, including the expected dates of adoption and estimated effects on
results of operations and financial condition, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Results of Operations
The following table shows product and service net revenues (in millions, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
$ Change |
|
%Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
$ Change |
|
%Change |
Net revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
$ |
723.9 |
|
|
$ |
541.7 |
|
|
$ |
182.2 |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
|
$ |
1,398.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,051.5 |
|
|
$ |
346.6 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
Percentage of net
revenues |
|
|
82.3 |
% |
|
|
81.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82.2 |
% |
|
|
81.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service |
|
|
155.1 |
|
|
|
123.2 |
|
|
|
31.9 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
303.8 |
|
|
|
240.4 |
|
|
|
63.4 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
Percentage of net
revenues |
|
|
17.7 |
% |
|
|
18.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.8 |
% |
|
|
18.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues |
|
$ |
879.0 |
|
|
$ |
664.9 |
|
|
$ |
214.1 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
$ |
1,701.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,291.9 |
|
|
$ |
410.0 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our net revenues increased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the same
periods in 2007 primarily as a result of increased sales of both Infrastructure and SLT solutions
to the service provider and enterprise markets. In particular, we had success in selling our
Infrastructure products to service providers who are adopting next generation networking (NGN) IP
networks, which are designed for higher capacity and efficiency to help reduce total operating
costs and to be able to offer multiple services over a single network. In the second quarter of
2008, we also experienced increased revenue from the enterprise market primarily due to the sales
of infrastructure product solutions. In addition, during the three and six months ended June 30,
2008, our new product releases and further expansion into emerging markets contributed to the
increase in total net revenues for those periods.
35
Infrastructure Segment Revenues
The following table shows net Infrastructure segment revenues and net Infrastructure segment
revenues as a percentage of total net revenues by product and service categories (in millions,
except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 (1) |
|
$ Change |
|
%Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 (1) |
|
$ Change |
|
%Change |
Net Infrastructure segment revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infrastructure product revenue |
|
$ |
575.9 |
|
|
$ |
402.9 |
|
|
$ |
173.0 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
|
$ |
1,104.6 |
|
|
$ |
788.1 |
|
|
$ |
316.5 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
Percentage of net revenues |
|
|
65.5 |
% |
|
|
60.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64.9 |
% |
|
|
61.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infrastructure service revenue |
|
|
96.5 |
|
|
|
78.0 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
189.7 |
|
|
|
153.6 |
|
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
Percentage of net revenues |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Infrastructure
segment revenues (1) |
|
$ |
672.4 |
|
|
$ |
480.9 |
|
|
$ |
191.5 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
$ |
1,294.3 |
|
|
$ |
941.7 |
|
|
$ |
352.6 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of net revenues |
|
|
76.5 |
% |
|
|
72.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76.1 |
% |
|
|
72.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Prior period amounts have been reclassified to reflect the 2008 segment structure, which now
includes service revenue in the Infrastructure and SLT segments. |
Infrastructure Product
For the three months ended June 30, 2008, the increase in Infrastructure product revenue was
primarily attributable to revenue growth from our MX- and T-series product families in both the
service provider and enterprise markets due to our customers increased demand for network
infrastructure solutions. To a lesser extent, our EX-series products also contributed to the
revenue growth in the second quarter of 2008. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, the increase
was primarily due to growth from MX-, M- and T-series product families as both our service provider
and enterprise customers continued to build out their networks as their bandwidth requirements
increased. E-series product revenue increased in the second quarter of 2008, but decreased in the
first six months of 2008, primarily as a result of the timing of revenue recognition compared to
revenue recognized in the same period in 2007 for prior year shipments. From a geographical
perspective, during the second quarter of 2008, we experienced growth in all three regions, with
particular strength in EMEA. In the first six months of 2008, we experienced strength in all
regions.
We track Infrastructure chassis revenue units and ports shipped to analyze customer trends and
indicate areas of potential network growth. Our Infrastructure product platforms are generally
modular, with the chassis serving as the base of the platform. Each chassis has a certain number of
slots that are available to be populated with components we refer to as modules or interfaces. The
modules are the components through which the router receives incoming packets of data from a
variety of transmission media. The physical connection between a transmission medium and a module
is referred to as a port. The number of ports on a module varies widely depending on the
functionality and throughput offered by the module. Chassis revenue units represent the number of
chassis on which revenue was recognized during the period. The following table shows Infrastructure
revenue units and ports shipped:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Unit Change |
% Change |
2008 |
2007 |
Unit Change |
|
% Change |
Infrastructure chassis revenue
units (1) |
|
|
3,387 |
|
|
|
2,458 |
|
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
6,392 |
|
|
|
4,948 |
|
|
|
1,444 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
Infrastructure ports shipped (1) |
|
|
94,284 |
|
|
|
51,824 |
|
|
|
42,460 |
|
|
|
82 |
% |
|
|
172,933 |
|
|
|
93,431 |
|
|
|
79,502 |
|
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes fixed configuration Ethernet switching products. |
Chassis revenue units increased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively,
compared to the same periods in 2007. The increases in chassis units and port shipments were driven
by bandwidth demand as customers are seeking to expand capabilities in their networks and to offer
differentiating feature-rich multi-play services that allow them to generate new revenue sources.
The port shipments also increased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the
same periods in 2007, primarily due to the increase in the overall number of chassis revenue units
from richly configured T- and M-series router products during the 2008 periods.
36
Infrastructure Service
The increase in Infrastructure service revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008,
was primarily due to an increase in our installed base of equipment being serviced. A majority of
our service revenue is earned from customers that purchase our products and enter into service
contracts for support service. We also experienced increased professional service revenue due to
consulting projects.
SLT Segment Revenues
The following table shows net SLT segment revenues and net SLT segment revenues as a percentage of
total net revenues by product and service categories (in millions, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 (1) |
|
$ Change |
|
%Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 (1) |
|
$ Change |
|
%Change |
Net SLT segment revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SLT product revenue |
|
|
148.0 |
|
|
|
138.8 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
293.5 |
|
|
|
263.4 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Percentage of net revenues |
|
|
16.8 |
% |
|
|
20.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
20.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SLT service revenue |
|
|
58.6 |
|
|
|
45.2 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
114.1 |
|
|
|
86.8 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
Percentage of net revenues |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total SLT segment
revenues (1) |
|
$ |
206.6 |
|
|
$ |
184.0 |
|
|
$ |
22.6 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
$ |
407.6 |
|
|
$ |
350.2 |
|
|
$ |
57.4 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of net revenues |
|
|
23.5 |
% |
|
|
27.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.9 |
% |
|
|
27.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Prior period amounts have been reclassified to reflect the 2008 segment structure, which now
includes service revenue in the Infrastructure and SLT segments. |
SLT Product
We experienced increases in SLT product revenue from Firewall products, which include branch and
high-end Firewall products, and J-series products in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008,
compared to the same periods a year ago, partially offset by a decline in revenues from DX and WX
products. The integrated systems introduced prior to 2007, such as the SSG Firewall products,
gained further traction in the market place with revenue from these product lines growing in the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to same periods in 2007. In the second quarter
of 2008, we experienced sales growth primarily in the enterprise market and in the first half of
2008; we experienced sales growth both in the service provider and enterprise markets.
Geographically, revenues increased in EMEA and APAC, for the three months ended June 30, 2008. We
experienced revenue increases in the EMEA and APAC, which were partially offset by a decrease in
the Americas regions in the six months ended June 30, 2008.
The following table shows SLT revenue units recognized:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Unit Change |
|
% Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Unit Change |
|
% Change |
Service Layer Technologies revenue units |
|
|
60,857 |
|
|
|
56,046 |
|
|
|
4,811 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
120,137 |
|
|
|
112,306 |
|
|
|
7,831 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
The increase in SLT revenue units of 9% was consistent with the 7% growth in SLT product revenue in
the three months ended June 30, 2008. In the six months ended June 30, 2008, SLT revenue units
increased by 7% compared to the 11% growth in SLT product revenue which was primarily due to the
product mix that favored higher margin products as compared to the same period in 2007.
In January 2008, we announced a plan to phase out our DX product line. These products will be
supported until 2013. We do not expect this plan to have a material impact on our condensed
consolidated results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition.
SLT Service
The increase in SLT service revenue was primarily due to an increase in our installed base of
equipment being serviced. A majority of our service revenue is earned from customers that purchase
our products and enter into service contracts for support.
37
Net Revenues by Geographic Region
The following table shows the total net revenues by geographic region (in millions, except
percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
Americas: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
325.3 |
|
|
$ |
289.7 |
|
|
$ |
35.6 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
$ |
713.4 |
|
|
$ |
569.2 |
|
|
$ |
144.2 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
Other |
|
|
63.3 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
|
|
|
37.8 |
|
|
|
148 |
% |
|
|
93.2 |
|
|
|
41.4 |
|
|
|
51.8 |
|
|
|
125 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Americas |
|
|
388.6 |
|
|
|
315.2 |
|
|
|
73.4 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
806.6 |
|
|
|
610.6 |
|
|
|
196.0 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
Percentage of net revenues |
|
|
44.2 |
% |
|
|
47.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47.4 |
% |
|
|
47.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe, Middle East, and Africa |
|
|
285.6 |
|
|
|
197.8 |
|
|
|
87.8 |
|
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
525.7 |
|
|
|
407.2 |
|
|
|
118.5 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
Percentage of net revenues |
|
|
32.5 |
% |
|
|
29.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.9 |
% |
|
|
31.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Pacific |
|
|
204.8 |
|
|
|
151.9 |
|
|
|
52.9 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
369.6 |
|
|
|
274.1 |
|
|
|
95.5 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
Percentage of net revenues |
|
|
23.3 |
% |
|
|
22.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.7 |
% |
|
|
21.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
879.0 |
|
|
$ |
664.9 |
|
|
$ |
214.1 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
$ |
1,701.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,291.9 |
|
|
$ |
410.0 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues in the Americas region increased in absolute dollars in the second quarter of 2008
compared to the same period in 2007 primarily due to growth in revenue from both service provider
and enterprise customers. In the United States, revenue increased in the service provider market as
well as the enterprise market, particularly from federal government customers. Net revenues in the
Americas region increased in absolute dollars in the first half of 2008 compared to the same period
in 2007 primarily due to increased sales of our core routers to the service provider market in the
United States as our customers continued to focus on increasing network performance, reliability
and scale. Net revenues in the Americas region as a percentage of total net revenue decreased in
the three months ended June 30, 2008, primarily due to the relative strength of sales in EMEA and
APAC. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, net revenues in the Americas region as a
percentage of total net revenues slightly increased primarily due to increased sales of our core
routers to the service provider and enterprise markets particularly in the United States, compared
to the same period in 2007, respectively.
Net revenues in EMEA increased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the
same periods in 2007 primarily due to revenue growth in emerging markets in Eastern Europe, Middle
East, and Africa which was driven by service provider network build-outs as a result of bandwidth
demand and growth in the enterprise market. Net revenue in EMEA as a percentage of total net
revenue increased in the three months ended June 30, 2008, primarily due to strength in the service
provider market and decreased in the six months ended June 30, 2008, primarily due to relative
strength of the Americas and APAC regions, compared to the same periods in 2007, respectively.
Net revenues in APAC increased, in absolute dollars and as a percentage of total net revenues, in
the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the same periods in 2007, primarily due
to strength in Japan, China and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries,
which was driven by bandwidth demand as well as our customers deployment of routing platforms for
their next-generation network. Increased sales in these countries were partially offset by a
decrease in revenue from Australia.
Net Revenues by Markets and Customers
We sell our high-performance network products and service offerings from both the Infrastructure
and SLT segments to two primary markets service providers and enterprise. The service provider
market includes wireline, wireless, and cable operators as well as major internet content and
application providers. The enterprise market represents businesses; federal, state and local
governments; and research and education institutions. During the three and six months ended June
30, 2008, the service provider market accounted for 72.6% and 73.2%, respectively, of our net
revenues, and the enterprise market accounted for 27.4% and 26.8%, respectively, of our net
revenues. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, the service provider market
accounted for 71.9% and 71.8%, respectively, of our net revenues, and the enterprise market
accounted for 28.1% and 28.2%, respectively, of our net revenues. Net revenues to the service provider market increased by 33% and 34% during the three
and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2007. Net revenues to the enterprise market increased by 29% and 25% during
the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the same periods in 2007.
NSN accounted for 10.4% of our net revenues in the three months ended June 30, 2008, and no single
customer accounted for greater than 10.0% of our net revenues during the six months ended June 30,
2008. NSN and Verizon each accounted for greater than 10.0% of our net revenues during the same
periods in 2007.
38
Cost of Revenues
The following table shows cost of product and service revenues and the related gross margin (GM)
percentages (in millions, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
Cost of revenues:
Product |
|
$ |
215.1 |
|
|
$ |
159.9 |
|
|
$ |
55.2 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
|
$ |
406.9 |
|
|
$ |
314.8 |
|
|
$ |
92.1 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
GM as a percentage of
product revenues |
|
|
70.3 |
% |
|
|
70.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70.9 |
% |
|
|
70.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service |
|
|
74.2 |
|
|
|
60.9 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
147.2 |
|
|
|
118.1 |
|
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
GM as a percentage of
service revenues |
|
|
52.2 |
% |
|
|
50.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51.6 |
% |
|
|
50.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues |
|
$ |
289.3 |
|
|
$ |
220.8 |
|
|
$ |
68.5 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
|
$ |
554.1 |
|
|
$ |
432.9 |
|
|
$ |
121.2 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GM as a percentage of
net revenues |
|
|
67.1 |
% |
|
|
66.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67.4 |
% |
|
|
66.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product revenues increased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the
same periods in 2007, while product gross margin slightly decreased in the three months ended June
30, 2008, and increased in the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the same periods of
2007.
The increase in cost of product revenues in absolute dollars was primarily due to our increase in
product revenues, which resulted in higher product costs. The slight decrease in product gross
margin as a percentage of product revenues in the three months ended June 30, 2008, compared to
same period in 2007, is primarily attributable to changes in the geography mix within our
Infrastructure segment, and, particularly with a higher percentage of total product revenue
experienced outside of the Americas. This overall decrease in product gross margin was partially
offset by increased product gross margin within our SLT segment primarily due to increased sales of
the higher margin Firewall and J-series products in the 2008 periods. The increase in product gross
margin as a percentage of product revenues in the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to same
period in 2007, was primarily attributable to revenue growth from Infrastructure products across
the higher-margin T- and M-series product families.
As of June 30, 2008, and 2007, we had 214 and 173 employees, respectively, in our manufacturing and
operations organization that primarily manage relationships with our contract manufacturers, manage
our supply chain, and monitor and manage product testing and quality.
The increases in cost of service revenues and service gross margin were commensurate with the
growth in revenue in absolute dollars and the timing of our spares components purchases. Personnel
related charges, consisting of salaries, bonus, fringe benefits expenses, stock-based compensation
expenses, and other employee-related expenses increased $6.9 million and $12.4 million in the three
and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, primarily due to a 12% increase in headcount,
from 691 to 773 employees, in the customer service organization to build our world-wide operations.
Our outside service expense also increased in the 2008 periods. Additionally, facilities and
information technology expenses related to cost of service revenues increased in connection with
the growth of service business as a portion of our overall operations.
Operating Expenses
The following table shows operating expenses (in millions, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
Research and development |
|
$ |
186.4 |
|
|
$ |
148.7 |
|
|
$ |
37.7 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
$ |
357.0 |
|
|
$ |
289.8 |
|
|
$ |
67.2 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
Sales and marketing |
|
|
190.3 |
|
|
|
156.9 |
|
|
|
33.4 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
376.3 |
|
|
|
307.5 |
|
|
|
68.8 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
35.6 |
|
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
69.3 |
|
|
|
55.3 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
Amortization of purchased intangible assets |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
(14.7 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
%) |
|
|
33.1 |
|
|
|
45.5 |
|
|
|
(12.4 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
%) |
Other charges, net |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
463 |
% |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
429.3 |
|
|
$ |
357.9 |
|
|
$ |
71.4 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
$ |
844.7 |
|
|
$ |
712.3 |
|
|
$ |
132.4 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
160.5 |
|
|
$ |
86.2 |
|
|
$ |
74.3 |
|
|
|
86 |
% |
|
$ |
303.1 |
|
|
$ |
146.7 |
|
|
$ |
156.4 |
|
|
|
107 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
The following table highlights our operating expenses as a percentage of net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Research and development |
|
|
21.2 |
% |
|
|
22.4 |
% |
|
|
21.0 |
% |
|
|
22.4 |
% |
Sales and marketing |
|
|
21.6 |
% |
|
|
23.6 |
% |
|
|
22.1 |
% |
|
|
23.8 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
Amortization of purchased intangible assets |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
Other charges, net |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
48.8 |
% |
|
|
53.8 |
% |
|
|
49.6 |
% |
|
|
55.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
18.3 |
% |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
17.8 |
% |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in research and development expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008,
was primarily due to strategic initiatives to expand our product portfolio and maintain our
technological advantage over competitors. Research and development expenses primarily consist of
personnel related expenses and new product development costs. Personnel related charges, consisting
of salaries, bonus, fringe benefits expenses, stock-based compensation expenses, and other
employee-related expenses increased $23.1 million and $38.5 million in the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008, respectively, primarily due to a 23% increase in headcount, from 2,354 to
2,898 employees in the engineering organization to support product innovation intended to capture
anticipated future network infrastructure growth and opportunities. Outside consulting and other
development expense also increased to support our product innovation initiatives. Additionally,
facilities and information technology expenses related to research and development expenses
increased to support these engineering efforts.
The increase in sales and marketing expenses was primarily due to increases in personnel related
expenses and marketing expenses. Personnel related charges, consisting of salaries, commissions,
bonus, fringe benefits, stock-based compensation expenses, and other employee-related expenses
increased $20.7 million and $35.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008,
respectively, primarily due to a 19% increase in headcount from 1,733 to 2,068 employees in our
worldwide sales and marketing organizations. Included in the personnel charges was an increase in
commission expense of $2.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the same
period in 2007, due to our higher net revenues. We also increased our investment in corporate and
channel marketing efforts from the prior year. As our sales force grew, we also increased
facilities and information technology expense related to the sales and marketing organizations in
the three months and six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the same 2007 periods.
The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to an increase in personnel
related expenses and outside professional services. Personnel related charges, consisting of
salaries, bonus, fringe benefits, stock-based compensation expenses, and other employee-related
expenses increased $4.6 million and $6.6 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008,
respectively, compared to the same 2007 periods, primarily due to a 19% increase in headcount in
our worldwide general and administrative functions from 271 to 322 employees to support the overall
growth of the business. Outside professional service fees increased in the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008, compared to the same 2007 periods as a result of increased legal fees and
business processes re-engineering costs. Additionally, facilities and information technology
related to general and administrative expenses increased to support our growing business.
Research and development, sales and marketing and general and administrative expenses each
decreased as a percentage of net revenues in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, compared
to the same 2007 periods, primarily due to our focused execution and cost control initiatives.
Amortization of purchased intangible assets decreased $14.7 million and $12.4 million in the three
and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, compared to the same 2007 periods, primarily due
to a decrease in amortization expense as certain purchased intangible assets became fully amortized
during the second quarter of 2008. This decrease was partially offset by the inclusion of an
impairment charge of $5.0 million, for the six months ended June 30, 2008, as a result of the phase
out of our DX products.
Other charges, net, increased $7.4 million in the three months ended June 30, 2008, primarily due
to a $9.0 million legal settlement expense and decreased $5.2 million in the six months ended June
30, 2008, primarily due to the absence of stock investigation and tax related charges that were
incurred in the same periods a year ago. See Note 4 Other Financial Information under Other
Charges, Net in Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item I of this Form 10-Q,
for more information.
40
Interest and Other Income, Net, Gain or (Loss) on Minority Equity Investments, and Income Tax
Provision
The following table shows net interest and other income and income tax provision (in millions,
except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
Interest and other income, net |
|
$ |
13.2 |
|
|
$ |
25.5 |
|
|
$ |
(12.3 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
%) |
|
$ |
30.8 |
|
|
$ |
58.4 |
|
|
$ |
(27.6 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
%) |
Percentage of net revenues |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) gain on minority
equity investments |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
|
(122 |
%) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
|
(122 |
%) |
Percentage of net revenues |
|
|
(0.2 |
%) |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M |
* |
|
|
(0.5 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
51.7 |
|
|
|
32.3 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
101.7 |
|
|
|
59.1 |
|
|
|
42.6 |
|
|
|
72 |
% |
Percentage of net revenues |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in interest and other income, net, was primarily due to lower interest rates in the
2008 period as compared to a year ago.
The gain (loss) on minority equity investments decreased by $8.2 million in the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the same periods in 2007. In the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008, we recorded a loss on two of our minority equity investments. In the three and six
months ended June 30, 2007, we realized a gain from one of our minority equity investments that
completed an initial public offering.
We recorded tax provisions of $51.7 million and $32.3 million for the three months ended June 30,
2008 and 2007, or effective tax rates of 30% and 27%, respectively. We recorded tax provisions of
$101.7 million and $59.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, or effective tax
rates of 31% and 28%, respectively. The effective tax rates for the three and six months ended June
30, 2008, differ from the federal statutory rate of 35% and the rate for the same periods in 2007
primarily due to earnings in foreign jurisdictions which are subject to lower rates and a reduced
benefit from tax credits due to the expiration of the federal research and development credit law
at December 31, 2007. Our income taxes payable for federal and state purposes was reduced by the
tax benefit from employee stock option transactions. This benefit totaled $14.6 million and $19.1
million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, and was reflected as an
increase to additional paid-in capital.
Our future effective tax rates could be subject to volatility or adversely affected by earnings
being lower than anticipated in countries where we have lower statutory rates and higher than
anticipated earnings in countries where we have higher statutory rates; by changes in the valuation
of our deferred tax assets and liabilities; by expiration of or lapses in the R&D tax credit laws;
by transfer pricing adjustments related to certain acquisitions including the license of acquired
intangibles under our intercompany R&D cost sharing arrangement; by tax effects of stock-based
compensation; by costs related to intercompany restructurings; or by changes in tax laws,
regulations, accounting principles, or interpretations thereof. In addition, we are subject to the
continuous examination of our income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax
authorities. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these
examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. There can be no assurance
that the outcomes from these continuous examinations will not have an adverse effect on our
operating results and financial condition.
41
Segment Information
For a description of the products and services for each segment; See Note 7 Segments in Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statement in Item I of this Form 10-Q.
Financial information for each segment used by management to make financial decisions and allocate
resources is as follows (in millions, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 (1) |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 (1) |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
Net Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infrastructure: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
$ |
575.9 |
|
|
$ |
402.9 |
|
|
$ |
173.0 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
|
$ |
1,104.6 |
|
|
$ |
788.1 |
|
|
$ |
316.5 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
Service |
|
|
96.5 |
|
|
|
78.0 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
189.7 |
|
|
|
153.6 |
|
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Infrastructure
revenues |
|
|
672.4 |
|
|
|
480.9 |
|
|
|
191.5 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
1,294.3 |
|
|
|
941.7 |
|
|
|
352.6 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service Layer Technologies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
|
148.0 |
|
|
|
138.8 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
293.5 |
|
|
|
263.4 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Service |
|
|
58.6 |
|
|
|
45.2 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
114.1 |
|
|
|
86.8 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Service Layer
Technologies
revenues |
|
|
206.6 |
|
|
|
184.0 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
407.6 |
|
|
|
350.2 |
|
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues |
|
|
879.0 |
|
|
|
664.9 |
|
|
|
214.1 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
1,701.9 |
|
|
|
1,291.9 |
|
|
|
410.0 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infrastructure |
|
|
195.1 |
|
|
|
133.5 |
|
|
|
61.6 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
386.6 |
|
|
|
259.4 |
|
|
|
127.2 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
Service Layer Technologies |
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating income |
|
|
207.4 |
|
|
|
135.5 |
|
|
|
71.9 |
|
|
|
53 |
% |
|
|
405.1 |
|
|
|
258.6 |
|
|
|
146.5 |
|
|
|
57 |
% |
Other corporate (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total management operating
income |
|
|
207.4 |
|
|
|
135.5 |
|
|
|
71.9 |
|
|
|
53 |
% |
|
|
400.4 |
|
|
|
258.6 |
|
|
|
141.8 |
|
|
|
55 |
% |
Amortization of purchased
intangible assets |
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
|
|
(24.1 |
) |
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
61 |
% |
|
|
(35.9 |
) |
|
|
(48.2 |
) |
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
(27.3 |
) |
|
|
(21.5 |
) |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
%) |
|
|
(50.1 |
) |
|
|
(47.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
%) |
Stock-based payroll tax expense |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
%) |
Other charges, net |
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income |
|
|
160.5 |
|
|
|
86.2 |
|
|
|
74.3 |
|
|
|
86 |
% |
|
|
303.1 |
|
|
|
146.7 |
|
|
|
156.4 |
|
|
|
107 |
% |
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
32.3 |
|
|
|
(20.7 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
%) |
|
|
29.3 |
|
|
|
65.2 |
|
|
|
(35.9 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
172.1 |
|
|
$ |
118.5 |
|
|
$ |
53.6 |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
|
$ |
332.4 |
|
|
$ |
211.9 |
|
|
$ |
120.5 |
|
|
|
57 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Prior period amounts have been reclassified to reflect the 2008 segment structure, which now
includes service revenue and operating results in the Infrastructure and SLT segments. |
|
(2) |
|
Other corporate represents miscellaneous expenses that have not been allocated to segment
operating results. |
|
N/M |
|
- Not meaningful. |
42
The following table shows financial information for each segment as a percentage of total net
revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 (1) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 (1) |
Net Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infrastructure: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
|
65.5 |
% |
|
|
60.6 |
% |
|
|
64.9 |
% |
|
|
61.0 |
% |
Service |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Infrastructure revenues |
|
|
76.5 |
% |
|
|
72.3 |
% |
|
|
76.1 |
% |
|
|
72.9 |
% |
Service Layer Technologies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
|
16.8 |
% |
|
|
20.9 |
% |
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
20.4 |
% |
Service |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Service Layer Technologies revenues |
|
|
23.5 |
% |
|
|
27.7 |
% |
|
|
23.9 |
% |
|
|
27.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infrastructure |
|
|
22.2 |
% |
|
|
20.1 |
% |
|
|
22.7 |
% |
|
|
20.1 |
% |
Service Layer Technologies |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
(0.1 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating income |
|
|
23.6 |
% |
|
|
20.4 |
% |
|
|
23.8 |
% |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
Other corporate (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total management operating income |
|
|
23.6 |
% |
|
|
20.4 |
% |
|
|
23.5 |
% |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
Amortization of purchased intangible assets |
|
|
(1.1 |
%) |
|
|
(3.6 |
%) |
|
|
(2.2 |
%) |
|
|
(3.7 |
%) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
(3.1 |
%) |
|
|
(3.2 |
%) |
|
|
(2.9 |
%) |
|
|
(3.7 |
%) |
Stock-based payroll tax expense |
|
|
(0.1 |
%) |
|
|
(0.3 |
%) |
|
|
(0.1 |
%) |
|
|
(0.2 |
%) |
Other charges, net |
|
|
(1.0 |
%) |
|
|
(0.3 |
%) |
|
|
(0.5 |
%) |
|
|
(1.0 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income |
|
|
18.3 |
% |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
17.8 |
% |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
17.8 |
% |
|
|
19.5 |
% |
|
|
16.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Prior period amounts have been reclassified to reflect the 2008 segment structure, which now
includes service revenue and operating results in the Infrastructure and SLT segments. |
|
(2) |
|
Other corporate represents miscellaneous expenses that have not been allocated to segment
operating results. |
Infrastructure Segment
An analysis of the change in revenue for the Infrastructure segment, and the change in units, can
be found above in the section titled Net Revenues.
Infrastructure segment operating income increased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008,
compared to the same periods in 2007, due to revenue growth outpacing expense growth.
Infrastructure product gross margin increased in absolute dollars in the three months ended June
30, 2008, compared to the year ago period primarily due to revenue growth in the T- and M-series
product families which generally have higher margins. The Infrastructure gross margin percentage
decreased slightly in the second quarter of 2008, compared to the same 2007 period, primarily as a
result of geographical mix during the period discussed in Net Revenue by Geographic Region above.
For the six months ended June 30, 2008, Infrastructure gross margin and gross margin percentage
increased as we experienced a favorable product mix and derived a larger portion of revenues from
richly configured high-end T- and M-series router products as well as high-margin port shipments.
We continued to invest in research and development efforts to continue our innovation of products
and expand our Infrastructure product portfolio, but our research and development expense decreased
as a percentage of Infrastructure net revenues primarily due to revenue growing faster than
expenses. We will continue to make investments to expand our product features and functionality
based upon the trends in the market place. Additionally, our sales and marketing expenses decreased
slightly as a percentage of Infrastructure revenues, but increased in absolute dollars as we
increased our efforts to reach enterprise and service provider customers. We allocate sales and
marketing, general and administrative, as well as facility and information technology expenses to
the Infrastructure segment generally based upon revenue, usage and headcount.
SLT Segment
An analysis of the change in revenue for the SLT segment, and the change in units, can be found
above in the section titled Net Revenues.
43
SLT segment operating income increased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to
the same periods in 2007 primarily due to revenue growth outpacing increases in SLT expenses. SLT
product gross margin and gross margin percentage increased in the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008, compared to prior year periods, primarily due to product mix, particularly from an
increase in the mix of higher margin high-end Firewall and J-series products in 2008. Research and
development related costs increased in absolute dollars, but decreased as a percentage of SLT
revenues in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the same 2007 periods,
primarily due to cost control initiatives that resulted in revenue growing faster than research and
development expenses. Additionally, sales and marketing as well as general and administrative
expenses as a percentage of SLT net revenues decreased primarily attributable to our focused
execution. We allocate sales and marketing, general and administrative, as well as facility and
information technology expenses to the SLT segment generally based on revenue, usage and headcount.
We generally experienced seasonality and fluctuations in the demand for our SLT products, which may
result in greater variations in our quarterly revenue.
Amortization of Purchased Intangible Assets, Stock-Based Compensation and Related Payroll Tax
Expense, Other Charges, Net, and Interest and Other Income, Net.
See Nature of Expenses and Operating Expenses for further discussion.
Key Performance Measures
In addition to the financial metrics included in the condensed consolidated financial statements,
we use the following key performance measures to assess quarterly operating results:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Days sales outstanding (DSO)(a) |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Book-to-bill ratio(b) |
|
|
>1 |
|
|
|
>1 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Days sales outstanding, or DSO, is calculated as the ratio of ending accounts receivable, net
of allowances, divided by average daily net sales for the preceding 90 days for the three
months ended June 30, 2008. DSO increased in the second quarter of 2008 compared to same
period of 2007, primarily due to the timing of receipts from our customers. |
|
(b) |
|
Book-to-bill ratio represents the ratio of product bookings divided by product revenues
during the period. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
We have funded our business through our operating activities and by issuing securities. The
following table shows our capital resources (in millions, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
Working capital |
|
$ |
1,915.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,175.3 |
|
|
$ |
740.4 |
|
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,040.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,716.1 |
|
|
$ |
324.3 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
Short-term investments |
|
|
263.2 |
|
|
|
240.4 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Long-term investments |
|
|
45.2 |
|
|
|
59.3 |
|
|
|
(14.1 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash, cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments |
|
$ |
2,348.8 |
|
|
$ |
2,015.8 |
|
|
$ |
333.0 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The significant components of our working capital are cash and cash equivalents, short-term
investments and accounts receivable, reduced by accounts payable, income tax payable, accrued
liabilities and short-term deferred revenue. Working capital increased primarily due to an increase
in cash and cash equivalents balance due to cash generated from operations and the conversion of
our Senior Notes into common stock.
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we repurchased $121.3 million or 4.7 million shares of
our common stock via open market purchases under two stock repurchase programs that were authorized
by our Board of Directors.
44
Under the $2.0 billion stock repurchase program approved in 2006 and 2007 (the 2006 Stock
Repurchase Program), we repurchased approximately 2.2 million shares of our common stock at an
average price of $24.61 per share, for a total purchase price of $53.1 million during the three
months ended March 31, 2008. No shares were repurchased under this program during the second
quarter of 2008. As of June 30, 2008, we have repurchased and retired approximately 71.6 million
shares of our common stock under the 2006 Stock Repurchase Program at an average price of $23.41
per share, and the program had remaining authorized funds of $323.8 million.
The Board of Directors approved another $1.0 billion stock repurchase program in March 2008 (the
2008 Stock Repurchase Program). Under this program, we repurchased approximately 2.5 million
shares of our common stock at an average price of $26.84 per share, for a total purchase price of
$68.2 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008. As of June 30, 2008, the 2008
Stock Repurchase Program had remaining authorized funds of $931.8 million.
All shares of common stock purchased under the 2006 and 2008 Stock Repurchase Programs have been
retired. Share repurchases under the our stock repurchase programs will be subject to a review of
the circumstances in place at the time and will be made from time to time in private transactions
or open market purchases as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements. These
programs may be discontinued at any time.
Based on past performance and current expectations, we believe that our existing cash and cash
equivalents, short-term and long-term investments, together with cash generated from operations as
well as cash generated from the exercise of employee stock options and purchase under our employee
stock purchase plan will be sufficient to fund our operations, debt, and growth for at least the
next 12 months. We believe our working capital is sufficient to meet our liquidity requirements for
capital expenditures, commitments and other liquidity requirements associated with our existing
operations during the same period.
However, our future capital requirements may vary materially from those now planned depending on
many factors, including:
|
|
|
the overall levels of sales of our products and gross profit margins; |
|
|
|
|
our business, product, capital expenditures and research and development plans; |
|
|
|
|
the market acceptance of our products; |
|
|
|
|
repurchases of our common stock; |
|
|
|
|
issuance and repayment of debt; |
|
|
|
|
litigation expenses, settlements and judgments; |
|
|
|
|
volume price discounts and customer rebates; |
|
|
|
|
the levels of accounts receivable that we maintain; |
|
|
|
|
acquisitions of other businesses, assets, products or technologies; |
|
|
|
|
changes in our compensation policies; |
|
|
|
|
capital improvements for new and existing facilities; |
|
|
|
|
technological advances; |
|
|
|
|
our competitors responses to our products; |
|
|
|
|
our relationships with suppliers and customers; |
45
|
|
|
possible future investments in raw material and finished goods inventories; |
|
|
|
|
expenses related to our future restructuring plans, if any; |
|
|
|
|
tax expense associated with stock-based awards; |
|
|
|
|
issuance of stock-based awards and the related payment in cash for withholding taxes in
the current year and possibly during future years; |
|
|
|
|
the level of exercises of stock options and stock purchases under our equity incentive
plans; and |
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions and specific conditions in our industry and markets,
including the effects of international conflicts and related uncertainties. |
Cash Requirements and Contractual Obligations
Our principal commitments primarily consisted of obligations outstanding under operating leases,
purchase commitments, tax liabilities and other contractual obligations.
As of June 16, 2008, holders of approximately $399.2 million in aggregate principal amount of
Senior Notes had converted these notes into approximately 19.8 million shares of our common stock.
We settled the remaining Senior Notes with a face value of $0.3 million principal amount at
maturity for cash. As of June 30, 2008, all of our Senior Notes were retired.
Our contractual obligations under operating leases primarily relate to our leased facilities under
our non-cancelable operating leases. Rent payments are allocated to costs and operating expenses in
our condensed consolidated statements of operations. We occupy approximately 1.9 million square
feet world wide under operating leases. The majority of our office space is in North America,
including our corporate headquarters in Sunnyvale, California. Our longest lease expires in January
2017. As of June 30, 2008, future minimum payments under our non-cancelable operating leases, net
of committed sublease income, were $225.6 million, of which $28.1 million will be paid over the
remaining six months of 2008.
In order to reduce manufacturing lead times and ensure adequate component supply, the contract
manufacturers place non-cancelable, non-returnable (NCNR) orders for components based on our
build forecast. As of June 30, 2008, there were NCNR component orders placed by our contract
manufacturers with a value of $113.0 million. We increased our NCNR component orders by $10.2
million in the six months ended June 30, 2008, to reduce our production lead time. The contract
manufacturers use the components to build products based on our forecasts and on purchase orders we
have received from our customers. Generally, we do not take ownership of the components and title
to the products transfers from contract manufacturers to us and immediately to our customers upon
delivery at a designated shipment location. If the components go unused or the products go unsold
for specified periods of time, we may incur carrying charges or obsolete materials charges for
components that our contract manufacturers purchased to build products to meet our forecast or
customer orders. As of June 30, 2008, we had accrued $26.2 million based on our estimate of such
charges.
As of June 30, 2008, we had $79.3 million of long-term liabilities in our condensed consolidated
balance sheet for unrecognized tax positions. At this time, we are unable to make a reasonably
reliable estimate of the timing of payments in individual years beyond the next 12 months due to
uncertainties in the timing of tax audit outcomes.
As of June 30, 2008, other contractual obligations consisted primarily of an indemnity-related
escrow amount of $2.3 million, a software subscription requiring payment of $5.0 million in January
2009, and a joint development agreement for $24.5 million with quarterly payments of $3.5 million
through January 2010. Additionally, in the second quarter of 2008, we entered into a five year,
$34.0 million data center hosting agreement requiring payments of $8.4 million in the third quarter
of 2008. The remaining commitment under this agreement is expected to be paid through the end of
April 2013. As of June 30, 2008, $34.0 million remained unpaid under the data center hosting
agreement.
46
In the six months ended June 30, 2008, cash and cash equivalents increased by $324.3 million, of
which $455.4 million was generated from our operating activities. This increase was partially
offset by cash used in investing activities of $95.6 million and cash used in financing activities
of $35.5 million.
Operating Activities
We generated cash from operating activities of $455.4 million in the six months ended June 30,
2008, compared to $350.7 million in the same period of 2007. The increase of $104.7 million in the
2008 period compared to a year ago was chiefly due to the following activities within the period:
|
|
|
Net income of $230.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $152.8
million in the same 2007 period due to revenue growth and decreases in expenses as a
percentage of net revenues. |
|
|
|
|
Cash outflow of $44.0 million due to an increase in net accounts receivable in the
second quarter of 2008, which was primarily due to the timing of product shipments at the
end of the quarter. |
|
|
|
|
Cash inflow of $79.5 million due to an increase in deferred revenue in the six months
ended June 30, 2008, as compared to an increase of $65.1 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2007. This increase in cash inflow is due to the impact of the growing installed
base on deferred service revenue and the impact on deferred product revenue from customer
payments received in advance of product acceptance. |
|
|
|
|
Cash inflow of $47.7 million primarily due to increases in other payables and
liabilities. In particular, our income taxes payable and long-term tax reserve liabilities
increased by $25.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared $4.1 million in
the same 2007 period, due to the timing of payments of federal, state and foreign income
taxes. |
Investing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2008, net cash used by investing activities was $95.6 million
compared to $442.8 million of net cash generated by investing activities in the six months ended
June 30, 2007. The change compared to the prior year period was primarily due to the movement of
cash from short and long-term investments to cash and cash equivalents during the first six months
of 2007 in anticipation of stock repurchases under the 2006 Stock Repurchase Program. In the first
six months of 2008, we invested a net $10.2 million in available-for-sale investments based upon
our investment strategy.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities was $35.5 million and $1,529.8 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. In the six months ended June 30 2008, we used $121.3
million to repurchase our common stock, partially offset by cash proceeds of $77.1 million from
common stock issued to employees, compared to the $1,623.2 million repurchases in the same 2007
period, partially offset by cash proceeds of $89.6 million from common stock issued to employees.
Factors That May Affect Future Results
A description of the risk factors associated with our business is included under Risk Factors in
Item 1A of Part II of this report.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk
We maintain an investment portfolio of various holdings, types and maturities. The values of our
investments are subject to market price volatility. In addition, a portion of our cash and
marketable securities are held in non-U.S. domiciled countries. These securities are generally
classified as available-for-sale and, consequently, are recorded
47
on our condensed consolidated balance sheet at fair value with unrealized gains or losses reported
as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income.
At any time, a rise in interest rates could have a material adverse impact on the fair value of our
investment portfolio. Conversely, declines in interest rates could have a material impact on
interest earnings of our investment portfolio. We do not currently hedge these interest rate
exposures. We recognized immaterial net gains or losses during the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007 related to the sales of our investments.
Foreign Currency Risk and Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts
Periodically, we use derivatives to partially offset our market exposure to fluctuations in foreign
currencies. We do not enter into derivatives for speculative or trading purposes.
We use foreign currency forward contracts to mitigate transaction gains and losses generated by
certain foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities. These derivatives are carried
at fair value with changes recorded in other income (expense). Changes in the fair value of these
derivatives are largely offset by re-measurement of the underlying assets and liabilities. These
foreign exchange contracts have maturities between one and two months.
Our sales are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars. Our costs of revenues and operating expenses
are denominated in U.S. dollars as well as other foreign currencies including the British Pound,
the Euro, Indian Rupee and Japanese Yen. Periodically, we use foreign currency forward and/or
option contracts to hedge certain forecasted foreign currency transactions relating to operating
expenses. These derivatives are designated as cash flow hedges and have maturities of less than one
year. The effective portion of the derivatives gain or loss is initially reported as a component
of accumulated other comprehensive income and, upon occurrence of the forecasted transaction, is
subsequently reclassified into the consolidated statements of operations line item to which the
hedged transaction relates. We record the ineffectiveness of the hedging instruments, which was
immaterial during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, in interest and other
income, net on our condensed consolidated statements of operations. Research and development, sales
and marketing, as well as general and administrative expenses slightly increased in the three and
six months ended June 30, 2008, compared with the same periods in 2007, due to the effect of
foreign currency fluctuations.
Equity Price Risk
Our portfolio of publicly-traded equity securities is inherently exposed to equity price risk as
the stock market fluctuates. We monitor our publicly-traded equity investments for impairment on a
periodic basis. In the event that the carrying value of a publicly-traded equity investment exceeds
its fair value, and we determine the decline in the value to be other than temporary, we reduce the
carrying value to its current fair value. We do not purchase our publicly-traded equity securities
with the intent to use them for trading or speculative purposes. They are classified as
available-for-sale securities in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No.
115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. The aggregate fair value of
our marketable equity securities was $5.0 million and $8.6 million as of June 30, 2008, and
December 31, 2007, respectively. A hypothetical 30% adverse change in the stock prices of our
portfolio of publicly-traded equity securities would result in an immaterial loss.
In addition to publicly-traded equity securities, we have also invested in privately-held
companies. These investments are carried at cost. The aggregate cost of our investments in
privately-held companies was $23.8 million and $23.3 million as of June 30, 2008, and December 31,
2007, respectively.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Attached as exhibits to this report are certifications of our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, which are required in accordance with Rule 13a-14 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). This Controls and Procedures section
includes information concerning the controls and related
48
evaluations referred to in the certifications and it should be read in conjunction with the
certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of
the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered in this report, our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission
rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Controls
In 2007, we initiated a multi-year implementation to upgrade certain key internal systems and
processes, including our company-wide human resources management system, CRM system and our ERP
system. This project is the result of our normal business process to evaluate and upgrade or
replace our systems software and related business processes to support our evolving operational
needs. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the second quarter of 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that our disclosure controls or our
internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control
system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute,
assurance that the control systems objectives will be met. Our controls and procedures are
designed to provide reasonable assurance that our control systems objective will be met and our
CEO and CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the
reasonable assurance level. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are
resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs.
Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can
provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all
control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These
inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that
breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the
individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of
the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about
the likelihood of future events. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future
periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The information set forth under Legal Proceedings section in Note 9 Commitments and
Contingencies in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 Part I of this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Factors That May Affect Future Results
Investments in equity securities of publicly traded companies involve significant risks. The market
price of our stock reflects a higher multiple of expected future earnings than many other
companies. Accordingly, even small changes in investor expectations for our future growth and
earnings, whether as a result of actual or rumored financial or operating results, changes in the
mix of the products and services sold, acquisitions, industry changes or other
49
factors, could trigger, and have triggered significant fluctuations in the market price of our
common stock. Investors in our securities should carefully consider all of the relevant factors,
including, but not limited to, the following factors, that could affect our stock price.
Our quarterly results are inherently unpredictable and subject to substantial fluctuations and, as
a result, we may fail to meet the expectations of securities analysts and investors, which could
adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.
Our revenues and operating results may vary significantly from quarter to quarter due to a number
of factors, many of which are outside of our control and any of which may cause our stock price to
fluctuate.
The factors that may affect the unpredictability of our quarterly results include, but are not
limited to; limited visibility into customer spending plans, changes in the mix of products sold,
changing market conditions, including current and potential customer consolidation, competition,
customer concentration, long sales and implementation cycles, regional economic and political
conditions and seasonality. For example, many companies in our industry experience adverse seasonal
fluctuations in customer spending patterns, particularly in the first and third quarters.
As a result, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of operating results are not
necessarily a good indication of what our future performance will be. It is likely that in some
future quarters, our operating results may be below the expectations of securities analysts or
investors, in which case the price of our common stock may decline. Such a decline could occur, and
has occurred in the past, even when we have met our publicly stated revenue and/or earnings
guidance.
Fluctuating economic conditions make it difficult to predict revenues for a particular period and a
shortfall in revenues or increase in costs of production may harm our operating results.
Our revenues depend significantly on general economic conditions and the demand for products in the
markets in which we compete. Economic weakness, customer financial difficulties and constrained
spending on network expansion have previously resulted (for example, in 2001 and 2002), and may in
the future result, in decreased revenues and earnings and could negatively impact our ability to
forecast and manage our contract manufacturer relationships. In addition, recent turmoil in the
geopolitical environment in many parts of the world and sustained increases in energy costs may
continue to put pressure on global economic conditions, which could lead to higher costs of
production and/or reduced demand for our products. Economic downturns may also lead to
restructuring initiatives and associated expenses and impairment of investments. In addition, our
operating expenses are largely based on anticipated revenue trends and a high percentage of our
expenses are, and will continue to be, fixed in the short-term. Uncertainty about future economic
conditions makes it difficult to forecast operating results and to make decisions about future
investments. Future economic weakness, customer financial difficulties, increases in costs of
production, and reductions in spending on network expansion could have a material adverse effect on
demand for our products and consequently on our results of operations and stock price.
Telecommunications companies and other large companies generally require more onerous terms and
conditions of their vendors. As we seek to sell more products to such customers, we may be required
to agree to terms and conditions that may have an adverse effect on our business or ability to
recognize revenues.
Telecommunications service provider companies and other large companies, because of their size,
generally have had greater purchasing power and, accordingly, have requested and received more
favorable terms, which often translate into more onerous terms and conditions for their vendors. As
we seek to sell more products to this class of customer, we may be required to agree to such terms
and conditions, which may include terms that affect the timing of our ability to recognize revenue
and have an adverse effect on our business and financial condition. Consolidation among such large
customers can further increase their buying power and ability to require onerous terms.
For example, many customers in this class have purchased products from other vendors who promised
certain functionality and failed to deliver such functionality and/or had products that caused
problems and outages in the networks of these customers. As a result, this class of customers may
request additional features from us and require substantial penalties for failure to deliver such
features or may require substantial penalties for any network outages that may be caused by our
products. These additional requests and penalties, if we are required to agree to them,
50
may affect our ability to recognize the revenues from such sales, which may negatively affect our
business and our financial condition. For example, in April 2006, we announced that we would be
required to defer a large amount of revenue from a customer due to the contractual obligations
required by that customer.
For arrangements with multiple elements, vendor specific objective evidence of fair value of the
undelivered element is required in order to separate the components and to account for elements of
the arrangement separately. Vendor specific objective evidence of fair value is based on the price
charged when the element is sold separately. However, customers may require terms and conditions
that make it more difficult or impossible for us to maintain vendor specific objective evidence of
fair value for the undelivered elements to a similar group of customers, the result of which could
cause us to defer the entire arrangement fees for a similar group of customers (product,
maintenance, professional services, etc.) and recognize revenue only when the last element is
delivered or if the only undelivered element is maintenance revenue would be recognized ratably
over the contractual maintenance period, which is generally one year but could be substantially
longer.
If we fail to accurately predict our manufacturing requirements, we could incur additional costs or
experience manufacturing delays which would harm our business.
We provide demand forecasts to our contract manufacturers. If we overestimate our requirements, the
contract manufacturers may assess charges or we may have liabilities for excess inventory, each of
which could negatively affect our gross margins. Conversely, because lead times for required
materials and components vary significantly and depend on factors such as the specific supplier,
contract terms and the demand for each component at a given time, if we underestimate our
requirements, the contract manufacturers may have inadequate time or materials and components
required to produce our products, which could increase costs or could delay or interrupt
manufacturing of our products and result in delays in shipments and deferral or loss of revenues.
We are dependent on sole source and limited source suppliers for several key components, which
makes us susceptible to shortages or price fluctuations in our supply chain and we may face
increased challenges in supply chain management in the future.
With the current demand for electronic products, component shortages are possible and the
predictability of the availability of such components may be limited. Growth in our business and
the economy is likely to create greater pressures on us and our suppliers to accurately project
overall component demand and to establish optimal component levels. If shortages or delays persist,
the price of these components may increase, or the components may not be available at all. We may
not be able to secure enough components at reasonable prices or of acceptable quality to build new
products in a timely manner and our revenues and gross margins could suffer until other sources can
be developed. For example, from time to time, including the first quarter of 2008, we have
experienced component shortages that resulted in delays of product shipments. We currently purchase
numerous key components, including ASICs, from single or limited sources. The development of
alternate sources for those components is time consuming, difficult and costly. In addition, the
lead times associated with certain components are lengthy and preclude rapid changes in quantities
and delivery schedules. In the event of a component shortage or supply interruption from these
suppliers, we may not be able to develop alternate or second sources in a timely manner. If, as a
result, we are unable to buy these components in quantities sufficient to meet our requirements on
a timely basis, we will not be able to deliver product to our customers, which would seriously
impact present and future sales, which would, in turn, adversely affect our business.
In addition, the development, licensing or acquisition of new products in the future may increase
the complexity of supply chain management. Failure to effectively manage the supply of key
components and products would adversely affect our business.
We are dependent on contract manufacturers with whom we do not have long-term supply contracts, and
changes to those relationships, expected or unexpected, may result in delays or disruptions that
could cause us to lose revenue and damage our customer relationships.
We depend on independent contract manufacturers (each of which is a third party manufacturer for
numerous companies) to manufacture our products. Although we have contracts with our contract
manufacturers, those contracts do not require them to manufacture our products on a long-term basis
in any specific quantity or at any
51
specific price. In addition, it is time consuming and costly to qualify and implement additional
contract manufacturer relationships. Therefore, if we should fail to effectively manage our
contract manufacturer relationships or if one or more of them should experience delays, disruptions
or quality control problems in our manufacturing operations, or if we had to change or add
additional contract manufacturers or contract manufacturing sites, our ability to ship products to
our customers could be delayed. Also, the addition of manufacturing locations or contract
manufacturers would increase the complexity of our supply chain management. Moreover, an increasing
portion of our manufacturing is performed in China and other countries and is therefore subject to
risks associated with doing business in other countries. For example, in connection with the 2008
Olympic Games the government of China has indicated that it may impose temporary limits on certain
activities, including business operations and personal travel. While we do not expect to be
impacted by any such limitations, there can be no assurance that any such limits will not adversely
affect our contract manufacturers or suppliers activities in China. Each of these factors could
adversely affect our business and financial results.
Our ability to process orders and ship products in a timely manner is dependent in part on our
business systems and performance of the systems and processes of third parties such as our contract
manufacturers, suppliers or other partners, as well as interfaces with the systems of such third
parties If our systems, the systems and processes of those third parties or the interfaces between
them experience delays or fail, our business processes and our ability to build and ship products
could be impacted, and our financial results could be harmed.
Some of our business processes depend upon our information technology systems, the systems and
processes of third parties and on interfaces with the systems of third parties. For example, our
order entry system feeds information into the systems of our contract manufacturers, which enables
them to build and ship our products. If those systems fail or are interrupted, our processes may
function at a diminished level or not at all. This could negatively impact our ability to ship
products or otherwise operate our business, and our financial results could be harmed. For example,
although it did not adversely affect our shipments, an earthquake in late December of 2006
disrupted communications with China, where a significant part of our manufacturing occurs.
We also rely upon the performance of the systems and processes of our contract manufacturers to
build and ship our products. If those systems and processes experience interruption or delay, our
ability to build and ship our products in a timely manner may be harmed. For example, as we have
expanded our contract manufacturing base to China, we have experienced instances where our contract
manufacturer was not able to ship products in the time periods expected by us. If we are not able
to ship our products or if product shipments are delayed, our ability to recognize revenue in a
timely manner for those products would be affected and our financial results could be harmed.
We expect gross margin to vary over time and our recent level of product gross margin may not be
sustainable.
Our product gross margins will vary from quarter to quarter and the recent level of gross margins
may not be sustainable and may be adversely affected in the future by numerous factors, including
product mix shifts, increased price competition in one or more of the markets in which we compete,
increases in material or labor costs, excess product component or obsolescence charges from our
contract manufacturers, increased costs due to changes in component pricing or charges incurred due
to component holding periods if our forecasts do not accurately anticipate product demand, warranty
related issues, or our introduction of new products or entry into new markets with different
pricing and cost structures.
A limited number of our customers comprise a significant portion of our revenues and any decrease
in revenue from these customers could have an adverse effect on our net revenues and operating
results.
A substantial majority of our net revenues depend on sales to a limited number of customers and
distribution partners. NSN accounted for greater than 10% of our net revenues during the three
months ended June 30, 2008, and no single customer accounted for greater than 10% of our net
revenues during the six months ended June 30, 2008. NSN and Verizon each accounted for greater than
10% of our net revenues during the three and six months ended June 30, 2007. This customer
concentration increases the risk of quarterly fluctuations in our revenues and operating results.
Any downturn in the business of our key customers or potential new customers could significantly
decrease sales to such customers, which could adversely affect our net revenues and results of
operations. In addition, in recent years there has been consolidation in the telecommunications
industry (for example, the acquisitions of AT&T Inc., MCI, Inc. and BellSouth Corporation) and
consolidation among the large vendors of
52
telecommunications equipment and services (for example, the combination of Alcatel and Lucent, the
joint venture of NSN and the acquisition of Redback by Ericsson). Such consolidation may cause our
customers who are involved in these acquisitions to suspend or indefinitely reduce their purchases
of our products or have other unforeseen consequences that could harm our business and operating
results.
The long sales and implementation cycles for our products, as well as our expectation that some
customers will sporadically place large orders with short lead times, may cause our revenues and
operating results to vary significantly from quarter to quarter.
A customers decision to purchase certain of our products involves a significant commitment of its
resources and a lengthy evaluation and product qualification process. As a result, the sales cycle
may be lengthy. In particular, customers making critical decisions regarding the design and
implementation of large or next-generation networks may engage in very lengthy procurement
processes that may delay or impact expected future orders. Throughout the sales cycle, we may spend
considerable time educating and providing information to prospective customers regarding the use
and benefits of our products. Even after making the decision to purchase, customers may deploy our
products slowly and deliberately. Timing of deployment can vary widely and depends on the skill set
of the customer, the size of the network deployment, the complexity of the customers network
environment and the degree of hardware and operating system configuration necessary to deploy the
products. Customers with large networks usually expand their networks in large increments on a
periodic basis. Accordingly, we may receive purchase orders for significant dollar amounts on an
irregular basis. These long cycles, as well as our expectation that customers will tend to
sporadically place large orders with short lead times, may cause revenues and operating results to
vary significantly and unexpectedly from quarter to quarter.
If we do not successfully anticipate market needs and develop products and product enhancements
that meet those needs, or if those products do not gain market acceptance, we may not be able to
compete effectively and our ability to generate revenues will suffer.
We cannot guarantee that we will be able to anticipate future market needs or be able to develop
new products or product enhancements to meet such needs or to meet them in a timely manner. If we
fail to anticipate market requirements or to develop new products or product enhancements to meet
those needs, such failure could substantially decrease market acceptance and sales of our present
and future products, which would significantly harm our business and financial results. Even if we
are able to anticipate, develop and commercially introduce new products and enhancements, there can
be no assurance that new products or enhancements will achieve widespread market acceptance. For
example, in the first quarter of 2008, we announced new products designed to address the Ethernet
switching market, a market in which we have not had a historical presence. If these new products do
not gain market acceptance at a sufficient rate of growth, or at all, our ability to meet future
financial targets may be adversely affected. Any failure of our products to achieve market
acceptance could adversely affect our business and financial results.
We rely on value-added resellers and distribution partners to sell our products, and disruptions
to, or our failure to effectively develop and manage our distribution channel and the processes and
procedures that support it could adversely affect our ability to generate revenues from the sale of
our products.
Our future success is highly dependent upon establishing and maintaining successful relationships
with a variety of value-added reseller and distribution partners. The majority of our revenues are
derived through value-added resellers and distributors, most of which also sell competitors
products. Our revenues depend in part on the performance of these partners. The loss of or
reduction in sales to our value-added resellers or distributors could materially reduce our
revenues. During 2006, Alcatel, another value-added reseller and a competitor of ours, acquired
Lucent, one of our largest value-added resellers. In addition, in April 2007 our largest customer,
Siemens, transferred its telecommunications business to a joint venture between Siemens and Nokia.
Our competitors may in some cases be effective in providing incentives to current or potential
resellers and distributors to favor their products or to prevent or reduce sales of our products.
If we fail to maintain relationships with our partners, fail to develop new relationships with
value-added resellers and distributors in new markets or expand the number of distributors and
resellers in existing markets, fail to manage, train or motivate existing value-added resellers and
distributors effectively or if these partners are not successful in their sales efforts, sales of
our products may decrease and our operating results would suffer.
53
In addition, we recognize a portion of our revenue based on a sell-through model using information
provided by our distributors. If those distributors provide us with inaccurate or untimely
information, the amount or timing of our revenues could be adversely impacted.
Further, in order to develop and expand our distribution channel, we must continue to scale and
improve our processes and procedures that support it, and those processes and procedures may become
increasingly complex and inherently difficult to manage. Our failure to successfully manage and
develop our distribution channel and the processes and procedures that support it could adversely
affect our ability to generate revenues from the sale of our products.
We face intense competition that could reduce our revenues and adversely affect our financial
results.
Competition is intense in the markets that we address. The IP infrastructure market has
historically been dominated by Cisco with other companies such as Alcatel-Lucent, Ericsson, Extreme
Networks, Foundry Networks, Huawei, and Nortel providing products to a smaller segment of the
market. In addition, a number of other small public and private companies have products or have
announced plans for new products to address the same challenges and markets that our products
address.
In the service layer technologies market, we face intense competition from a broader group of
companies including appliance vendors such as Cisco, Fortinet, F5 Networks, Nortel and Riverbed,
and software vendors such as CheckPoint. In addition, a number of other small public and private
companies have products or have announced plans for new products to address the same challenges and
markets that our products address.
In addition, actual or speculated consolidation among competitors, or the acquisition of our
partners and resellers by competitors, can increase the competitive pressures faced by us. In this
regard, Alcatel combined with Lucent in 2006 and Ericsson acquired Redback in 2007. A number of our
competitors have substantially greater resources and can offer a wider range of products and
services for the overall network equipment market than we do. If we are unable to compete
successfully against existing and future competitors on the basis of product offerings or price, we
could experience a loss in market share and revenues and/or be required to reduce prices, which
could reduce our gross margins, and which could materially and adversely affect our business,
operating results and financial condition.
We are a party to lawsuits, which are costly to investigate and defend and, if determined adversely
to us, could require us to pay damages or prevent us from taking certain actions, any or all of
which could harm our business and financial condition.
We and certain of our current and former officers and current and former members of our board of
directors are subject to various lawsuits. For example, we have been served with lawsuits related
to the alleged backdating of stock options and other related matters, a description of which can be
found above in Note 9 Commitments and Contingencies in Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements under the heading Legal Proceedings. There can be no assurance that these or any
actions that have been or may be brought against us will be resolved in our favor. Regardless of
whether they are resolved in our favor, these lawsuits are, and any future lawsuits to which we may
become a party will likely be, expensive and time consuming to investigate, defend, settle and/or
resolve. Such costs of investigation and defense, as well as any losses resulting from these claims
or settlement of these claims, could significantly increase our expenses and adversely affect our
profitability and cash flow.
In addition, we are party to a lawsuit which seeks to enjoin us from granting equity awards under
our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2006 Plan), as well as to invalidate all awards granted under
such plan to date. The 2006 Plan is the only active plan under which we currently grant stock
options and restricted stock units to our employees. If this lawsuit is not resolved in our favor,
we may be prevented from using the 2006 Plan to provide these equity awards to recruit new
employees or to compensate existing employees, which would put us at a significant disadvantage to
other companies that compete for workers in high technology industries such as ours. Accordingly,
our ability to hire, retain and motivate current and prospective employees would be harmed, the
result of which could negatively impact our business operations.
54
We are currently implementing upgrades to key internal systems and processes, and problems with the
design or implementation of these systems and processes could interfere with our business and
operations.
We have initiated a project to upgrade certain key internal systems and processes, including our
company-wide human resources management system, our CRM system and our ERP system. We have
invested, and will continue to invest, significant capital and human resources in the design and
implementation of these systems and processes, which may be disruptive to our underlying business.
Any disruptions or delays in the design and implementation of the new systems or processes,
particularly any disruptions or delays that impact our operations, could adversely affect our
ability to process customer orders, ship products, provide service and support to our customers,
bill and track our customers, fulfill contractual obligations, record and transfer information in a
timely and accurate manner, file SEC reports in a timely manner or otherwise run our business. Even
if we do not encounter these adverse effects, the design and implementation of these new systems
and processes may be much more costly than we anticipated. If we are unable to successfully design
and implement these new systems and processes as planned, or if the implementation of these systems
and processes is more costly than anticipated, our financial position, results of operations and
cash flows could be negatively impacted.
Litigation or claims regarding intellectual property rights may be time consuming, expensive and
require a significant amount of resources to prosecute, defend or make our products non-infringing.
Third parties have asserted and may in the future assert claims or initiate litigation related to
patent, copyright, trademark and other intellectual property rights to technologies and related
standards that are relevant to our products. The asserted claims and/or initiated litigation may
include claims against us or our manufacturers, suppliers or customers, alleging infringement of
their proprietary rights with respect to our products. Regardless of the merit of these claims,
they have been and can be time consuming, result in costly litigation and may require us to develop
non-infringing technologies or enter into license agreements. Furthermore, because of the potential
for high awards of damages or injunctive relief that are not necessarily predictable, even arguably
unmeritorious claims may be settled for significant amounts of money. If any infringement or other
intellectual property claim made against us by any third party is successful, if we are required to
settle litigation for significant amounts of money, or if we fail to develop non-infringing
technology or license required proprietary rights on commercially reasonable terms and conditions,
our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.
Changes in effective tax rates or adverse outcomes resulting from examination of our income or
other tax returns could adversely affect our results.
Our future effective tax rates could be subject to volatility or adversely affected by: earnings
being lower than anticipated in countries where we have lower statutory rates and higher than
anticipated earnings in countries where we have higher statutory rates; by changes in the valuation
of our deferred tax assets and liabilities; by expiration of or lapses in the R&D tax credit laws;
by transfer pricing adjustments related to certain acquisitions including the license of acquired
intangibles under our intercompany R&D cost sharing arrangement; by tax effects of stock-based
compensation; by costs related to intercompany restructurings; or by changes in tax laws,
regulations, accounting principles, or interpretations thereof. In addition, we are subject to the
continuous examination of our income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax
authorities. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these
examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. There can be no assurance
that the outcomes from these continuous examinations will not have an adverse effect on our
operating results and financial condition.
We are exposed to fluctuations in currency exchange rates which could negatively affect our
financial results and cash flows.
Because a majority of our business is conducted outside the United States, we face exposure to
adverse movements in non-US currency exchange rates. These exposures may change over time as
business practices evolve and could have a material adverse impact on our financial results and
cash flows.
The majority of our revenues and expenses are transacted in U.S. Dollars. We also have some
transactions that are denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the British Pound, the Euro,
Indian Rupee and Japanese Yen related to our sales and service operations outside of the United
States. An increase in the value of the U.S. Dollar could increase the real cost to our customers
of our products in those markets outside the United States where we sell in
55
U.S. Dollars, and a weakened dollar could increase the cost of local operating expenses and
procurement of raw materials to the extent we must purchase components in foreign currencies.
Currently, we hedge only those currency exposures associated with certain assets and liabilities
denominated in nonfunctional currencies and periodically will hedge anticipated foreign currency
cash flows. The hedging activities undertaken by us are intended to offset the impact of currency
fluctuations on certain nonfunctional currency assets and liabilities. However, no amount of
hedging can be effective against all circumstances, including long-term declines in the value of
the U.S. Dollar. If our attempts to hedge against these risks are not successful or if long-term
declines in the value of the U.S. Dollar persist, our net income could be adversely impacted.
We are required to expense equity compensation given to our employees, which has reduced our
reported earnings, will significantly harm our operating results in future periods and may reduce
our stock price and our ability to effectively utilize equity compensation to attract and retain
employees.
We historically have used stock options and other equity awards as a significant component of our
employee compensation program in order to align employees interests with the interests of our
stockholders, encourage employee retention, and provide competitive compensation packages. The
Financial Accounting Standards Board has adopted changes that require companies to record a charge
to earnings for employee stock option grants and other equity incentives. We adopted this standard
effective January 1, 2006. By causing us to record significantly increased compensation costs, such
accounting changes have reduced, and will continue to reduce, our reported earnings, and will
significantly harm our operating results in future periods. This may require us to reduce the
availability and amount of equity incentives provided to employees, which may make it more
difficult for us to attract, retain and motivate key personnel. Moreover, if securities analysts,
institutional investors and other investors adopt financial models that include stock option
expense in their primary analysis of our financial results, our stock price could decline as a
result of reliance on these models with higher expense calculations. Each of these results could
materially and adversely affect our business.
Matters related to the investigation into our historical stock option granting practices and the
restatement of our financial statements has resulted in litigation and regulatory proceedings, and
may result in additional litigation or other possible government actions.
Our historical stock option granting practices and the restatement of our financial statements have
exposed us to greater risks associated with litigation, regulatory proceedings and government
enforcement actions. For more information regarding our current litigation and related inquiries,
please see Note 9 Commitments and Contingencies in Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements under the heading Legal Proceedings as well as the other risk factors related to
litigation set forth in this section. We have provided the results of our internal review and
independent investigation to the SEC and the United States Attorneys Office for the Northern
District of California, and in that regard we have responded to formal and informal requests for
documents and additional information. In August 2007, we announced that we entered into a
settlement agreement with the SEC in connection with our historical stock option granting practices
in which we consented to a permanent injunction against any future violations of the antifraud,
reporting, books-and-records and internal control provisions of the federal securities laws. This
settlement concluded the SECs formal investigation of the Company with respect to this matter. In
addition, while we believe that we have made appropriate judgments in determining the correct
measurement dates for our stock option grants, the SEC may disagree with the manner in which we
accounted for and reported, or did not report, the corresponding financial impact. We are also
subject to civil litigation related to the stock option matters. No assurance can be given
regarding the outcomes from litigation or other possible government actions. The resolution of
these matters will be time consuming, expensive, and may distract management from the conduct of
our business. Furthermore, if we are subject to adverse findings in litigation or if we enter into
any settlements related thereto, we could be required to pay damages or penalties or have other
remedies imposed, which could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows.
56
If we fail to adequately evolve our financial and managerial control and reporting systems and
processes, our ability to manage and grow our business will be negatively affected.
Our ability to successfully offer our products and implement our business plan in a rapidly
evolving market depends upon an effective planning and management process. We will need to continue
to improve our financial and managerial control and our reporting systems and procedures in order
to manage our business effectively in the future. If we fail to continue to implement improved
systems and processes, our ability to manage our business and results of operations may be
negatively affected.
Our success depends upon our ability to effectively plan and manage our resources and restructure
our business through rapidly fluctuating economic and market conditions.
Our ability to successfully offer our products and services in a rapidly evolving market requires
an effective planning, forecasting, and management process to enable us to effectively scale our
business and adjust our business in response to fluctuating market opportunities and conditions. In
periods of market expansion, we have increased investment in our business by, for example,
increasing headcount and increasing our investment in research and development and other parts of
our business. Conversely, during 2001 and 2002, in response to downward trending industry and
market conditions, we restructured our business and reduced our workforce. Many of our expenses,
such as real estate expenses, cannot be rapidly or easily adjusted as a result of fluctuations in
our business or numbers of employees. Moreover, rapid changes in the size of our workforce could
adversely affect the ability to develop and deliver products and services as planned or impair our
ability to realize our current or future business objectives.
Our ability to develop, market and sell products could be harmed if we are unable to retain or hire
key personnel.
Our future success depends upon our ability to recruit and retain the services of executive,
engineering, sales, marketing and support personnel. The supply of highly qualified individuals, in
particular engineers in very specialized technical areas, or sales people specializing in the
service provider and enterprise markets, is limited and competition for such individuals is
intense. None of our officers or key employees is bound by an employment agreement for any specific
term. The loss of the services of any of our key employees, the inability to attract or retain
personnel in the future or delays in hiring required personnel, particularly engineers and sales
people, and the complexity and time involved in replacing or training new employees, could delay
the development and introduction of new products, and negatively impact our ability to market, sell
or support our products.
We sell our products to customers that use those products to build networks and IP infrastructure
and, if the demand for network and IP systems does not continue to grow, then our business,
operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected.
A substantial portion of our business and revenue depends on the growth of secure IP infrastructure
and on the deployment of our products by customers that depend on the continued growth of IP
services. As a result of changes in the economy and capital spending or the building of network
capacity in excess of demand, all of which have in the past particularly affected
telecommunications service providers, spending on IP infrastructure can vary, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business and financial results. In addition, a number of our
existing customers are evaluating the build out of their next generation network, or NGN. During
the decision making period when the customers are determining the design of those networks and the
selection of the equipment they will use in those networks, such customers may greatly reduce or
suspend their spending on secure IP infrastructure. Such pauses in purchases can make it more
difficult to predict revenues from such customers, can cause fluctuations in the level of spending
by these customers and, even where our products are ultimately selected, can have a material
adverse effect on our business and financial results.
Integration of past acquisitions and future acquisitions could disrupt our business and harm our
financial condition and stock price and may dilute the ownership of our stockholders.
We have made, and may continue to make, acquisitions in order to enhance our business. In 2005 we
completed the acquisitions of five private companies. Acquisitions involve numerous risks,
including problems combining the purchased operations, technologies or products, unanticipated
costs, diversion of managements attention from our core businesses, adverse effects on existing
business relationships with suppliers and customers, risks associated
57
with entering markets in which we have no or limited prior experience and potential loss of key
employees. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully integrate any businesses,
products, technologies or personnel that we might acquire. The integration of businesses that we
have acquired has been, and will continue to be, a complex, time consuming and expensive process.
Acquisitions may also require us to issue common stock that dilutes the ownership of our current
stockholders, assume liabilities, record goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets that will
be subject to impairment testing on a regular basis and potential periodic impairment charges,
incur amortization expenses related to certain intangible assets, and incur large and immediate
write-offs and restructuring and other related expenses, all of which could harm our operating
results and financial condition.
In addition, if we fail in our integration efforts with respect to our acquisitions and are unable
to efficiently operate as a combined organization utilizing common information and communication
systems, operating procedures, financial controls and human resources practices, our business and
financial condition may be adversely affected.
Our products are highly technical and if they contain undetected errors, our business could be
adversely affected and we might have to defend lawsuits or pay damages in connection with any
alleged or actual failure of our products and services.
Our products are highly technical and complex, are critical to the operation of many networks and,
in the case of our security products, provide and monitor network security and may protect valuable
information. Our products have contained and may contain one or more undetected errors, defects or
security vulnerabilities. Some errors in our products may only be discovered after a product has
been installed and used by end customers. Any errors, defects or security vulnerabilities
discovered in our products after commercial release could result in loss of revenues or delay in
revenue recognition, loss of customers, loss of future business, and increased service and warranty
cost, any of which could adversely affect our business and results of operations. Also, in the
event an error, defect or vulnerability is attributable to a component supplied by a third-party
vendor, we may not be able to recover from the vendor all of the costs of remediation that we may
incur. In addition, we could face claims for product liability, tort or breach of warranty.
Defending a lawsuit, regardless of its merit, is costly and may divert managements attention. In
addition, if our business liability insurance coverage is inadequate or future coverage is
unavailable on acceptable terms or at all, our financial condition could be harmed.
A breach of network security could harm public perception of our security products, which could
cause us to lose revenues.
If an actual or perceived breach of network security occurs in the network of a customer of our
security products, regardless of whether the breach is attributable to our products, the market
perception of the effectiveness of our products could be harmed. This could cause us to lose
current and potential end customers or cause us to lose current and potential value-added resellers
and distributors. Because the techniques used by computer hackers to access or sabotage networks
change frequently and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, we may be
unable to anticipate these techniques.
If our products do not interoperate with our customers networks, installations will be delayed or
cancelled and could harm our business.
Our products are designed to interface with our customers existing networks, each of which have
different specifications and utilize multiple protocol standards and products from other vendors.
Many of our customers networks contain multiple generations of products that have been added over
time as these networks have grown and evolved. Our products will be required to interoperate with
many or all of the products within these networks as well as future products in order to meet our
customers requirements. If we find errors in the existing software or defects in the hardware used
in our customers networks, we may have to modify our software or hardware to fix or overcome these
errors so that our products will interoperate and scale with the existing software and hardware,
which could be costly and negatively impact our operating results. In addition, if our products do
not interoperate with those of our customers networks, demand for our products could be adversely
affected or orders for our products could be cancelled. This could hurt our operating results,
damage our reputation and seriously harm our business and prospects.
58
Governmental regulations affecting the import or export of products could negatively affect our
revenues.
The United States and various foreign governments have imposed controls, export license
requirements and restrictions on the import or export of some technologies, especially encryption
technology. In addition, from time to time, governmental agencies have proposed additional
regulation of encryption technology, such as requiring the escrow and governmental recovery of
private encryption keys. Governmental regulation of encryption technology and regulation of imports
or exports, or our failure to obtain required import or export approval for our products, could
harm our international and domestic sales and adversely affect our revenues.
Due to the global nature of our operations, economic or social conditions or changes in a
particular country or region could adversely affect our sales or increase our costs and expenses,
which could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition.
We conduct significant sales and customer support operations directly and indirectly through our
distributors and value-added resellers in countries throughout the world and also depend on the
operations of our contract manufacturers and suppliers that are located inside and outside of the
United States. In addition, our research and development and our general and administrative
operations are conducted in the United States as well as other countries. Accordingly, our future
results could be materially adversely affected by a variety of uncontrollable and changing factors
including, among others, political or social unrest, natural disasters, epidemic disease, war, or
economic instability in a specific country or region, trade protection measures and other
regulatory requirements which may affect our ability to import or export our products from various
countries, service provider and government spending patterns affected by political considerations
and difficulties in staffing and managing international operations. Any or all of these factors
could have a material adverse impact on our revenue, costs, expenses, results of operations and
financial condition.
Our products incorporate and rely upon licensed third-party technology and if licenses of
third-party technology do not continue to be available to us or become very expensive, our revenues
and ability to develop and introduce new products could be adversely affected.
We integrate licensed third-party technology into certain of our products. From time to time, we
may be required to license additional technology from third parties to develop new products or
product enhancements. Third-party licenses may not be available or continue to be available to us
on commercially reasonable terms. Our inability to maintain or re-license any third-party licenses
required in our products or our inability to obtain third-party licenses necessary to develop new
products and product enhancements, could require us to obtain substitute technology of lower
quality or performance standards or at a greater cost, any of which could harm our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject to risks arising from our international operations.
We derive a majority of our revenues from our international operations, and we plan to continue
expanding our business in international markets in the future. As a result of our international
operations, we are affected by economic, regulatory and political conditions in foreign countries,
including changes in IT spending generally, the imposition of government controls, changes or
limitations in trade protection laws, unfavorable changes in tax treaties or laws, natural
disasters, labor unrest, earnings expatriation restrictions, misappropriation of intellectual
property, acts of terrorism and continued unrest in many regions and other factors, which could
have a material impact on our international revenues and operations. In particular, in some
countries we may experience reduced intellectual property protection. Moreover, local laws and
customs in many countries differ significantly from those in the United States. In many foreign
countries, particularly in those with developing economies, it is common for others to engage in
business practices that are prohibited by our internal policies and procedures or United States
regulations applicable to us. Although we implement policies and procedures designed to ensure
compliance with these laws and policies, there can be no assurance that all of our employees,
contractors and agents will not take actions in violation of them. Violations of laws or key
control policies by our employees, contractors or agents could result in financial reporting
problems, fines, penalties, or prohibition on the importation or exportation of our products and
could have a material adverse effect on our business.
59
While we believe that we currently have adequate internal control over financial reporting, we are
exposed to risks from legislation requiring companies to evaluate those internal controls.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires our management to report on, and our
independent auditors to attest to, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting. We have an ongoing program to perform the system and process evaluation and testing
necessary to comply with these requirements. We have and will continue to incur significant
expenses and devote management resources to Section 404 compliance on an ongoing basis. In the
event that our chief executive officer, chief financial officer or independent registered public
accounting firm determine in the future that our internal controls over financial reporting are not
effective as defined under Section 404, investor perceptions may be adversely affected and could
cause a decline in the market price of our stock.
Regulation of the telecommunications industry could harm our operating results and future
prospects.
The telecommunications industry is highly regulated and our business and financial condition could
be adversely affected by changes in the regulations relating to the telecommunications industry.
Currently, there are few laws or regulations that apply directly to access to or commerce on IP
networks. We could be adversely affected by regulation of IP networks and commerce in any country
where we operate. Such regulations could address matters such as voice over the Internet or using
Internet Protocol, encryption technology, and access charges for service providers. In addition,
regulations have been adopted with respect to environmental matters, such as the Waste Electrical
and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) and Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in
Electrical and Electronic Equipment (RoHS) regulations adopted by the European Union, as well as
regulations prohibiting government entities from purchasing security products that do not meet
specified local certification criteria. Compliance with such regulations may be costly and
time-consuming for us and our suppliers and partners. The adoption and implementation of such
regulations could decrease demand for our products, and at the same time could increase the cost of
building and selling our products as well as impact our ability to ship products into affected
areas and recognize revenue in a timely manner, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business, operating results and financial condition.
Our reported financial results could suffer if there is an additional impairment of goodwill or
other intangible assets with indefinite lives.
We are required to test annually, and review on an interim basis, our goodwill and intangible
assets with indefinite lives, including the goodwill associated with past acquisitions and any
future acquisitions, to determine if impairment has occurred. If such assets are deemed impaired,
an impairment loss equal to the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the
assets would be recognized. This would result in incremental expenses for that quarter which would
reduce any earnings or increase any loss for the period in which the impairment was determined to
have occurred. For example, such impairment could occur if the market value of our common stock
falls below certain levels for a sustained period or if the portions of our business related to
companies we have acquired fail to grow at expected rates or decline. In the second quarter of
2006, this impairment evaluation resulted in a reduction of $1,280.0 million to the carrying value
of goodwill on our balance sheet for the SLT operating segment, primarily due to the decline in our
market capitalization that occurred over a period of approximately nine months prior to the
impairment review and, to a lesser extent, a decrease in the forecasted future cash flows used in
the income approach. Declines in our stock prices in the future as well as any marked decline in
our level of revenues or gross margins increase the risk that goodwill and intangible assets may
become impaired in future periods. We cannot accurately predict the amount and timing of any
impairment of assets.
The investment of our cash balance and our investments in government and corporate debt securities
are subject to risks which may cause losses and affect the liquidity of these investments.
At June 30, 2008, we had $2,040.4 million in cash and cash equivalents and $308.4 million in short-
and long-term investments. We have invested these amounts primarily in U.S. government securities,
corporate notes and bonds, commercial paper, and money market funds meeting certain criteria.
Certain of these investments are subject to general credit, liquidity, market and interest rate
risks, which may be exacerbated by U.S. sub-prime mortgage defaults that have affected various
sectors of the financial markets and caused credit and liquidity issues. These market risks
associated with our investment portfolio may have a negative adverse effect on our results of
operations, liquidity and financial condition.
60
Uninsured losses could harm our operating results.
We self-insure against many business risks and expenses, such as intellectual property litigation
and our medical benefit programs, where we believe we can adequately self-insure against the
anticipated exposure and risk or where insurance is either not deemed cost-effective or is not
available. We also maintain a program of insurance coverage for various types of property,
casualty, and other risks. We place our insurance coverage with various carriers in numerous
jurisdictions. The types and amounts of insurance that we obtain vary from time to time and from
location to location, depending on availability, cost, and our decisions with respect to risk
retention. The policies are subject to deductibles, policy limits and exclusions that result in our
retention of a level of risk on a self-insurance basis. Losses not covered by insurance could be
substantial and unpredictable and could adversely affect our results of operations.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
There were no unregistered sales of equity securities during the period covered by this report.
(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Maximum Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as |
|
|
Value of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
that May Yet Be |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Announced |
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Plans or |
|
|
Under the Plans or |
|
Period |
|
Purchased(1) |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
Programs(1) |
|
April 1 April 30, 2008 |
|
|
282,404 |
|
|
$ |
27.32 |
|
|
|
282,404 |
|
|
$ |
1,316,032,950 |
|
May 1 May 31, 2008 |
|
|
1,129,616 |
|
|
|
28.28 |
|
|
|
1,129,616 |
|
|
|
1,284,061,654 |
|
June 1 June 30, 2008 |
|
|
1,129,616 |
|
|
|
25.23 |
|
|
|
1,129,616 |
|
|
|
1,255,536,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2,541,636 |
|
|
$ |
26.84 |
|
|
|
2,541,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In July 2006 and February 2007, the Companys Board of Directors (the Board) approved a
stock repurchase program (the 2006 Stock Repurchase Program). This program authorizes the
Company to purchase up to a total of $2.0 billion of the Companys common stock. In addition,
during March 2008, the Board approved a new stock repurchase program (the 2008 Stock
Repurchase Program) which enables the Company to purchase up to $1.0 billion of the Companys
common stock. This new program is in addition to the 2006 Stock Repurchase Program. During the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company repurchased and retired 2,541,636 shares
and 4,697,794 shares of common stock at an average price of $26.84 per share and $25.82 per
share, respectively, under the 2006 Stock Repurchase Program and the 2008 Stock Repurchase
Program. Purchases under these programs will be subject to a review of the circumstances in
place at the time. Acquisitions under this stock repurchase program will be made from time to
time as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements. These programs may be
discontinued at any time. |
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The annual meeting of stockholders of Juniper Networks, Inc. was held on May 21, 2008, at 1220 N.
Mathilda Ave., Sunnyvale, California. The results of the voting on the matters submitted to the
stockholders are as follows:
Proposal 1: To elect two members of the Companys Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Withheld |
Mary B. Cranston |
|
|
453,837,706 |
|
|
|
11,261,829 |
|
J. Michael Lawrie |
|
|
456,349,256 |
|
|
|
8,750,279 |
|
61
Proposal 2: To approve the Juniper Networks, Inc. 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
Votes for: |
|
|
410,178,332 |
|
Votes against: |
|
|
3,885,111 |
|
Abstain: |
|
|
4,297,495 |
|
|
|
Proposal 3: To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
Votes for: |
|
|
451,993,615 |
|
Votes against: |
|
|
8,717,697 |
|
Abstain: |
|
|
4,388,222 |
|
In addition to Ms. Cranston and Mr. Lawrie, the terms of following members of the Companys Board
of Directors continued following the annual meeting of stockholders: Scott Kriens, Robert
Calderoni, Michael Rose, Stratton Sclavos, Pradeep Sindhu and William Stensrud.
62
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Document |
3.1
|
|
Juniper Networks, Inc. Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 27, 2001) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Juniper Networks, Inc. (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 12, 2008) |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Description of Compensatory Arrangements for Edward Minshull adopted on May 13,
2008 (incorporated by reference to Item 5.02 of the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 13, 2008) |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Juniper Networks, Inc. 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 16, 2008) |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Juniper Networks, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.4 of the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 16, 2008) |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
63
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant had duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Juniper Networks, Inc.
|
|
August 8, 2008 |
By: |
/s/ Robyn M. Denholm
|
|
|
Robyn M. Denholm |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer) |
64
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Document |
3.1
|
|
Juniper Networks, Inc. Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 27, 2001) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Juniper Networks, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 12,
2008) |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Description of Compensatory Arrangements for Edward Minshull adopted on May 13, 2008 (incorporated by
reference to Item 5.02 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on May 13, 2008) |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Juniper Networks, Inc. 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of
the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
June 16, 2008) |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Juniper Networks, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
June 16, 2008) |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
65