e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(mark one)
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
for the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
for the transition period from to .
Commission File Number 001-31950
MoneyGram International, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
16-1690064 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1550 Utica Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota
|
|
55416 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(952) 591-3000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or
a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
As of November 6, 2006, 84,050,387 shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value, were outstanding.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
UNAUDITED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except |
|
|
|
share and per share data) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (substantially restricted) |
|
|
886,395 |
|
|
|
866,391 |
|
Receivables (substantially restricted) |
|
|
1,602,153 |
|
|
|
1,325,622 |
|
Investments (substantially restricted) |
|
|
5,761,583 |
|
|
|
6,233,333 |
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
136,775 |
|
|
|
105,545 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
44,055 |
|
|
|
37,477 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
27,376 |
|
|
|
28,743 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
18,363 |
|
|
|
13,248 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
419,657 |
|
|
|
404,270 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
59,106 |
|
|
|
60,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
8,955,463 |
|
|
$ |
9,075,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment service obligations |
|
$ |
7,878,315 |
|
|
$ |
8,059,309 |
|
Debt |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
3,733 |
|
|
|
5,055 |
|
Pension and other postretirement benefits |
|
|
93,291 |
|
|
|
105,485 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
157,114 |
|
|
|
131,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
8,282,453 |
|
|
|
8,451,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares undesignated, $0.01 par value, 5,000,000 authorized, none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares junior participating, $0.01 par value, 2,000,000 authorized, none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, $.01 par value: 250,000,000 shares authorized, 88,556,077 shares issued |
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
70,388 |
|
|
|
80,038 |
|
Retained income |
|
|
700,934 |
|
|
|
613,497 |
|
Unearned employee benefits and other |
|
|
(16,532 |
) |
|
|
(25,401 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
1,563 |
|
|
|
11,825 |
|
Treasury stock: 3,701,889 and 2,701,163 shares at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 |
|
|
(84,229 |
) |
|
|
(56,716 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
673,010 |
|
|
|
624,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
8,955,463 |
|
|
$ |
9,075,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
3
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
UNAUDITED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30 |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Dollars and share in thousands, |
|
|
(Dollars and share in thousands, |
|
|
|
except per share data) |
|
|
except per share data) |
|
REVENUE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee and other revenue |
|
$ |
200,894 |
|
|
$ |
156,375 |
|
|
$ |
556,862 |
|
|
$ |
444,173 |
|
Investment revenue |
|
|
96,406 |
|
|
|
91,634 |
|
|
|
297,882 |
|
|
|
272,188 |
|
Net securities losses |
|
|
(869 |
) |
|
|
(1,624 |
) |
|
|
(1,728 |
) |
|
|
(2,060 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
296,431 |
|
|
|
246,385 |
|
|
|
853,016 |
|
|
|
714,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee commissions expense |
|
|
83,144 |
|
|
|
58,940 |
|
|
|
226,246 |
|
|
|
167,344 |
|
Investment commissions expense |
|
|
63,520 |
|
|
|
60,889 |
|
|
|
185,346 |
|
|
|
177,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commissions expense |
|
|
146,664 |
|
|
|
119,829 |
|
|
|
411,592 |
|
|
|
345,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
|
149,767 |
|
|
|
126,556 |
|
|
|
441,424 |
|
|
|
369,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
44,753 |
|
|
|
35,180 |
|
|
|
128,473 |
|
|
|
97,745 |
|
Transaction and operations support |
|
|
41,318 |
|
|
|
34,547 |
|
|
|
112,615 |
|
|
|
106,733 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
10,419 |
|
|
|
8,102 |
|
|
|
28,197 |
|
|
|
23,187 |
|
Occupancy, equipment and supplies |
|
|
9,314 |
|
|
|
8,156 |
|
|
|
26,748 |
|
|
|
25,106 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
2,003 |
|
|
|
1,697 |
|
|
|
5,925 |
|
|
|
5,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
107,807 |
|
|
|
87,682 |
|
|
|
301,958 |
|
|
|
258,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
41,960 |
|
|
|
38,874 |
|
|
|
139,466 |
|
|
|
110,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
11,922 |
|
|
|
10,076 |
|
|
|
41,787 |
|
|
|
28,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
30,038 |
|
|
|
28,798 |
|
|
|
97,679 |
|
|
|
82,651 |
|
Income and gain from discontinued operation, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
30,038 |
|
|
$ |
29,538 |
|
|
$ |
97,679 |
|
|
$ |
83,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average outstanding common shares |
|
|
84,298 |
|
|
|
84,883 |
|
|
|
84,468 |
|
|
|
84,748 |
|
Additional dilutive shares related to stock-based compensation |
|
|
1,501 |
|
|
|
1,136 |
|
|
|
1,684 |
|
|
|
1,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average outstanding and potentially dilutive common shares |
|
|
85,799 |
|
|
|
86,019 |
|
|
|
86,152 |
|
|
|
85,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
4
MONEYGRAM
INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME
UNAUDITED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30 |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
30,038 |
|
|
$ |
29,538 |
|
|
$ |
97,679 |
|
|
$ |
83,391 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net holding gains (losses) arising during the period, net of tax expense
(benefit) of $22,689 and ($19,646) for the three months ended September
30, 2006
and 2005, respectively, and ($8,306) and ($30,253) for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively |
|
|
37,019 |
|
|
|
(32,743 |
) |
|
|
(13,551 |
) |
|
|
(50,422 |
) |
|
Reclassification adjustment for net realized gains included in net
income, net of tax expense of $330 and $609 for the three months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $657 and $772 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively |
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
|
1,071 |
|
|
|
1,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,558 |
|
|
|
(31,728 |
) |
|
|
(12,480 |
) |
|
|
(49,134 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized (losses) gains on derivative financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net holding (losses) gains arising during the period, net of tax
(benefit) expense
of ($10,844) and $13,686 for the three months ended September 30, 2006
and 2005,
respectively, and ($4,373) and $41,683 for the nine months ended
September 30,
2006 and 2005, respectively |
|
|
(17,692 |
) |
|
|
22,811 |
|
|
|
(7,136 |
) |
|
|
69,472 |
|
Reclassifications from other comprehensive income to net income,
net of tax expense (benefit) of $2,248 and ($3,074) for the three months
ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $4,158 and ($14,530)
for
the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively |
|
|
3,667 |
|
|
|
(5,124 |
) |
|
|
6,785 |
|
|
|
(24,216 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,025 |
) |
|
|
17,687 |
|
|
|
(351 |
) |
|
|
45,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses), net of tax expense
(benefit) of $30 and ($126) for the three months ended September 30, 2006
and 2005, respectively, and $1,574 and ($2,054) for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
2,569 |
|
|
|
(3,423 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
23,581 |
|
|
|
(14,251 |
) |
|
|
(10,262 |
) |
|
|
(7,301 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
53,619 |
|
|
$ |
15,287 |
|
|
$ |
87,417 |
|
|
$ |
76,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
UNAUDITED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
30,038 |
|
|
$ |
29,538 |
|
|
$ |
97,679 |
|
|
$ |
83,391 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings in discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(740 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(740 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
10,419 |
|
|
|
8,102 |
|
|
|
28,197 |
|
|
|
23,187 |
|
Investment impairment charges |
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
|
1,312 |
|
|
|
3,529 |
|
|
|
4,740 |
|
Net (gain) loss on sale of investments |
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
(1,801 |
) |
|
|
(2,680 |
) |
Net amortization of investment premium |
|
|
(2,773 |
) |
|
|
2,090 |
|
|
|
(5,721 |
) |
|
|
6,740 |
|
Provision for uncollectible receivables |
|
|
1,518 |
|
|
|
1,948 |
|
|
|
2,763 |
|
|
|
6,788 |
|
Non-cash compensation expense |
|
|
1,707 |
|
|
|
1,139 |
|
|
|
5,233 |
|
|
|
3,653 |
|
Other non-cash items, net |
|
|
(1,630 |
) |
|
|
(5,849 |
) |
|
|
(6,803 |
) |
|
|
2,261 |
|
Changes in foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
2,569 |
|
|
|
(3,423 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
(1,986 |
) |
|
|
2,095 |
|
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
590 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
6,053 |
|
|
|
16,964 |
|
|
|
2,784 |
|
|
|
1,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
14,225 |
|
|
|
27,163 |
|
|
|
31,473 |
|
|
|
42,225 |
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents (substantially restricted) |
|
|
(154,183 |
) |
|
|
332,403 |
|
|
|
(10,473 |
) |
|
|
(72,011 |
) |
Change in receivables, net (substantially restricted) |
|
|
(39,948 |
) |
|
|
(88,236 |
) |
|
|
(278,935 |
) |
|
|
(636,491 |
) |
Change in payment service obligations |
|
|
(264,147 |
) |
|
|
(200,730 |
) |
|
|
(192,985 |
) |
|
|
579,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(414,015 |
) |
|
|
100,138 |
|
|
|
(353,241 |
) |
|
|
(2,963 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of investments |
|
|
379,007 |
|
|
|
4,744 |
|
|
|
492,493 |
|
|
|
773,501 |
|
Proceeds from maturities of investments |
|
|
239,261 |
|
|
|
271,149 |
|
|
|
625,567 |
|
|
|
739,770 |
|
Purchases of investments |
|
|
(176,118 |
) |
|
|
(357,902 |
) |
|
|
(668,859 |
) |
|
|
(1,438,718 |
) |
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(17,102 |
) |
|
|
(6,877 |
) |
|
|
(57,299 |
) |
|
|
(32,228 |
) |
Cash received (paid) for acquisitions |
|
|
5,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,311 |
) |
|
|
(8,535 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
430,789 |
|
|
|
(88,886 |
) |
|
|
384,591 |
|
|
|
33,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
2,964 |
|
|
|
3,322 |
|
|
|
20,192 |
|
|
|
5,956 |
|
Tax benefits from share-based compensation |
|
|
1,171 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
4,936 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(17,504 |
) |
|
|
(14,089 |
) |
|
|
(46,236 |
) |
|
|
(34,902 |
) |
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(3,405 |
) |
|
|
(855 |
) |
|
|
(10,242 |
) |
|
|
(2,596 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(16,774 |
) |
|
|
(11,252 |
) |
|
|
(31,350 |
) |
|
|
(30,827 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS Beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS End of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
6
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
UNAUDITED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
Additional |
|
Retained |
|
Benefits |
|
(Loss) |
|
Stock in |
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
Capital |
|
Income |
|
and Other |
|
Income |
|
Treasury |
|
Total |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
As of December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
886 |
|
|
$ |
80,038 |
|
|
$ |
613,497 |
|
|
$ |
(25,401 |
) |
|
$ |
11,825 |
|
|
$ |
(56,716 |
) |
|
$ |
624,129 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,679 |
|
Dividends ($0.04 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,242 |
) |
Employee benefit plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,650 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,723 |
|
|
|
17,942 |
|
Treasury shares acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,236 |
) |
|
|
(46,236 |
) |
Unrealized foreign currency translation
adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,569 |
|
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,480 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,480 |
) |
Unrealized loss on derivative financial
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
886 |
|
|
$ |
70,388 |
|
|
$ |
700,934 |
|
|
$ |
(16,532 |
) |
|
$ |
1,563 |
|
|
$ |
(84,229 |
) |
|
$ |
673,010 |
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
7
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of MoneyGram International, Inc.
(MoneyGram or the Company) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01
of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required for
complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary
for a fair presentation have been included and are of a normal recurring nature. Operating results
for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the
results that may be expected for future periods. For further information, refer to the consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005.
2. Consolidation of Special Purpose Entities
Special purpose entities (SPEs) are trusts, partnerships or corporations established for a
particular limited purpose. The Company participates in various trust arrangements (special
purpose entities) related to official check processing agreements with financial institutions and
structured investments within the investment portfolio. The Company has determined that these
special purpose entities meet the definition of a variable interest entity under Financial
Interpretation (FIN) 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, and must be included in
our consolidated financial statements.
Working in cooperation with certain financial institutions, the Company has established separate
consolidated entities (special-purpose entities) and processes that provide these financial
institutions with additional assurance of our ability to clear their official checks. These
processes include maintenance of specified ratios of segregated investments to outstanding payment
instruments, typically 1 to 1. In some cases, alternative credit support has been purchased that
provides backstop funding as additional security for payment of instruments. However, the Company
remains liable to satisfy the obligations, both contractually and by operation of the Uniform
Commercial Code, as issuer and drawer of the official checks. Accordingly, the obligations have
been recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets under Payment service obligations. Under certain
limited circumstances, clients have the right to either demand liquidation of the segregated assets
or to replace us as the administrator of the special-purpose entity. Such limited circumstances
consist of material (and in most cases continued) failure of MoneyGram to uphold its warranties and
obligations pursuant to its underlying agreements with the financial institution clients. While an
orderly liquidation of assets would be required, any of these actions by a client could nonetheless
diminish the value of the total investment portfolio, decrease earnings, and result in loss of the
client or other customers or prospects. The Company offers the special purpose entity to certain
financial institution clients as a benefit unique in the payment services industry.
Certain structured investments the Company owns represent beneficial interests in grantor trusts or
other similar entities. These trusts typically contain an investment grade security, generally a
U.S. Treasury strip, and an investment in the residual interest in a collateralized debt
obligation, or in some cases, a limited partnership interest. For certain of these trusts, the
Company owns a percentage of the beneficial interests which results in the Company absorbing a
majority of the expected losses. Therefore, the Company consolidates these trusts by recording and
accounting for the assets of the trust separately in the consolidated financial statements.
The Company follows the accounting guidance in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of
Liabilities, to determine whether or not SPEs are qualifying SPEs (a QSPE). A QSPE is an entity
with significantly limited permissible activities which are entirely specified in the legal
documents establishing the SPE and may only be significantly changed with the approval of the
holders of at least a majority of the beneficial interests held by parties other than the
sponsoring company. If the Company has a variable interest in a QSPE, or is a sponsor of an SPE
that does not meet the criteria required to be a QSPE, the Company follows the accounting guidance
in FIN 46R to determine if the Company is required to consolidate the SPE.
8
3. Acquisitions
On May 31, 2006, MoneyGram completed the acquisition of Money Express, the Companys former super
agent in Italy. In connection with the acquisition, the Company formed MoneyGram Payment Systems
Italy, a wholly-owned subsidiary, to operate the former Money Express network. The acquisition
provides the Company with the opportunity for further network expansion and more control of
marketing and promotional activities in the region.
MoneyGram acquired Money Express for $15.0 million, subject to purchase price adjustments. The
acquisition cost includes $1.3 million of transaction costs and the forgiveness of $0.7 million of
liabilities. During the third quarter of 2006, the Company received a purchase price adjustment of
$6.0 million. The Company is in the process of finalizing the valuation of intangible assets and
deferred taxes from this acquisition, among other items, which may result in adjustment to the
purchase price allocation. Purchased intangible assets of $7.3 million, consisting primarily of
agent contracts and a non-compete agreement, will be amortized over useful lives ranging from 3 to
5 years. Preliminary goodwill of $15.3 million was recorded and assigned to our Global Funds
Transfer segment.
The operating results of Money Express subsequent to May 31, 2006 are included in the Companys
Consolidated Statement of Income. The financial impact of the acquisition is not material to the
Consolidated Balance Sheet or Consolidated Statement of Income.
4. Unrestricted Assets
The Company is regulated by various state agencies which generally require us to maintain liquid
assets and investments with an investment rating of A or higher in an amount generally equal to the
payment service obligation for those regulated payment instruments, namely teller checks, agent
checks, money orders, and money transfers. Consequently, a significant amount of cash and cash
equivalents, receivables and investments are restricted to satisfy the liability to pay the face
amount of regulated payment service obligations upon presentment. The Company is not regulated by
state agencies for payment service obligations resulting from outstanding cashiers checks;
however, the Company restricts a portion of the funds related to these payment instruments due to
contractual arrangements and/or Company policy. Assets restricted for regulatory or contractual
reasons are not available to satisfy working capital or other financing requirements. The
regulatory and contractual requirements do not require the Company to specify individual assets
held to meet our payment service obligations; nor is the Company required to deposit specific
assets into a trust, escrow or other special account. Rather, the Company must maintain a pool of
liquid assets. No third party places limitations, legal or otherwise, on the Company regarding the
use of its individual liquid assets. The Company is able to withdraw, deposit and/or sell its
individual liquid assets at will, with no prior notice or penalty, provided the Company maintains a
total pool of liquid assets sufficient to meet the regulatory and contractual requirements.
The Company has unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, receivables and investments to the extent
those assets exceed all payment service obligations. These amounts are generally available;
however, management considers a portion of these amounts as providing additional assurance that
regulatory requirements are maintained during the normal fluctuations in the value of investments.
The following table shows the total amount of unrestricted assets at September 30, 2006, and
December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (substantially restricted) |
|
$ |
886,395 |
|
|
$ |
866,391 |
|
Receivables (substantially restricted) |
|
|
1,602,153 |
|
|
|
1,325,622 |
|
Investments (substantially restricted) |
|
|
5,761,583 |
|
|
|
6,233,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,250,131 |
|
|
|
8,425,346 |
|
Amounts restricted to cover payment service obligations |
|
|
(7,878,315 |
) |
|
|
(8,059,309 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted assets |
|
$ |
371,816 |
|
|
$ |
366,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
5. Investments (Substantially Restricted)
The amortized cost and fair value of investments were as follows at September 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
782,843 |
|
|
$ |
28,286 |
|
|
$ |
(342 |
) |
|
$ |
810,787 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
609,087 |
|
|
|
6,907 |
|
|
|
(2,348 |
) |
|
|
613,646 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
1,685,611 |
|
|
|
4,613 |
|
|
|
(23,344 |
) |
|
|
1,666,880 |
|
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
1,919,318 |
|
|
|
34,120 |
|
|
|
(8,258 |
) |
|
|
1,945,180 |
|
Obligations of U.S. government agencies |
|
|
347,530 |
|
|
|
3,351 |
|
|
|
(6,360 |
) |
|
|
344,521 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
345,392 |
|
|
|
8,471 |
|
|
|
(829 |
) |
|
|
353,034 |
|
Preferred and common stock |
|
|
30,175 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
(2,716 |
) |
|
|
27,535 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,719,956 |
|
|
$ |
85,824 |
|
|
$ |
(44,197 |
) |
|
$ |
5,761,583 |
|
|
|
|
The amortized cost and fair value of investments were as follows at December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
836,419 |
|
|
$ |
35,610 |
|
|
$ |
(529 |
) |
|
$ |
871,500 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
691,604 |
|
|
|
10,297 |
|
|
|
(2,235 |
) |
|
|
699,666 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
1,894,227 |
|
|
|
5,024 |
|
|
|
(20,800 |
) |
|
|
1,878,451 |
|
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
1,963,047 |
|
|
|
38,340 |
|
|
|
(10,885 |
) |
|
|
1,990,502 |
|
U.S. government agencies |
|
|
360,236 |
|
|
|
5,641 |
|
|
|
(5,274 |
) |
|
|
360,603 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
395,869 |
|
|
|
11,830 |
|
|
|
(2,266 |
) |
|
|
405,433 |
|
Preferred and common stock |
|
|
30,175 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
(3,214 |
) |
|
|
27,178 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,171,577 |
|
|
$ |
106,959 |
|
|
$ |
(45,203 |
) |
|
$ |
6,233,333 |
|
|
|
|
All securities were classified as available-for-sale at September 30, 2006 and December 31,
2005. The amortized cost and fair value of securities at September 30, 2006 by contractual maturity
are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may
have the right to call or prepay obligations, sometimes without call or prepayment penalties.
Maturities of mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities depend on the repayment
characteristics and experience of the underlying obligations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Market |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
In one year or less |
|
$ |
23,683 |
|
|
$ |
23,810 |
|
After one year through five years |
|
|
575,019 |
|
|
|
585,107 |
|
After five years through ten years |
|
|
533,249 |
|
|
|
547,666 |
|
After ten years |
|
|
343,814 |
|
|
|
351,759 |
|
Mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities |
|
|
4,214,016 |
|
|
|
4,225,706 |
|
Preferred and common stock |
|
|
30,175 |
|
|
|
27,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,719,956 |
|
|
$ |
5,761,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
At September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, net unrealized gains of $41.6 million ($25.8
million net of tax) and $61.8 million ($38.3 million net of tax), respectively, are included in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets in Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income. During the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2006, $0.5 million and $1.1 million, respectively, was
reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income to earnings in connection with the sale
of the underlying securities, as compared to $1.0 million and $1.3 million for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2005, respectively. Gross realized gains and losses on sales of
securities and other-than-temporary impairments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Gross realized gains |
|
$ |
1,552 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
4,399 |
|
|
$ |
7,544 |
|
Gross realized losses |
|
|
(1,330 |
) |
|
|
(372 |
) |
|
|
(2,598 |
) |
|
|
(4,864 |
) |
Other-than-temporary impairments |
|
|
(1,091 |
) |
|
|
(1,312 |
) |
|
|
(3,529 |
) |
|
|
(4,740 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net securities gains and losses |
|
$ |
(869 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,624 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,728 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,060 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2006, the investment portfolio had the following aged unrealized losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
12 months or More |
|
Total |
|
|
Market |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
|
Unrealized |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
5,174 |
|
|
$ |
(23 |
) |
|
$ |
42,690 |
|
|
$ |
(319 |
) |
|
$ |
47,864 |
|
|
$ |
(342 |
) |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
116,502 |
|
|
|
(1,162 |
) |
|
|
115,284 |
|
|
|
(1,186 |
) |
|
|
231,786 |
|
|
|
(2,348 |
) |
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
1,426,424 |
|
|
|
(22,860 |
) |
|
|
14,756 |
|
|
|
(484 |
) |
|
|
1,441,180 |
|
|
|
(23,344 |
) |
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
302,833 |
|
|
|
(3,682 |
) |
|
|
244,300 |
|
|
|
(4,576 |
) |
|
|
547,133 |
|
|
|
(8,258 |
) |
U.S. government agencies |
|
|
49,569 |
|
|
|
(529 |
) |
|
|
271,783 |
|
|
|
(5,831 |
) |
|
|
321,352 |
|
|
|
(6,360 |
) |
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
95,885 |
|
|
|
(208 |
) |
|
|
39,965 |
|
|
|
(621 |
) |
|
|
135,850 |
|
|
|
(829 |
) |
Preferred and common stock |
|
|
5,613 |
|
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
11,844 |
|
|
|
(2,621 |
) |
|
|
17,457 |
|
|
|
(2,716 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,002,000 |
|
|
$ |
(28,559 |
) |
|
$ |
740,622 |
|
|
$ |
(15,638 |
) |
|
$ |
2,742,622 |
|
|
$ |
(44,197 |
) |
|
|
|
At December 31, 2005, the investment portfolio had the following aged unrealized losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
12 months or More |
|
Total |
|
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
62,783 |
|
|
$ |
(529 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
62,783 |
|
|
$ |
(529 |
) |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
209,056 |
|
|
|
(1,572 |
) |
|
|
33,770 |
|
|
|
(663 |
) |
|
|
242,826 |
|
|
|
(2,235 |
) |
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
1,081,400 |
|
|
|
(13,105 |
) |
|
|
375,400 |
|
|
|
(7,695 |
) |
|
|
1,456,800 |
|
|
|
(20,800 |
) |
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
656,313 |
|
|
|
(10,086 |
) |
|
|
75,813 |
|
|
|
(799 |
) |
|
|
732,126 |
|
|
|
(10,885 |
) |
U.S. government agencies |
|
|
241,994 |
|
|
|
(3,327 |
) |
|
|
80,452 |
|
|
|
(1,947 |
) |
|
|
322,446 |
|
|
|
(5,274 |
) |
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
104,438 |
|
|
|
(1,847 |
) |
|
|
30,719 |
|
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
135,157 |
|
|
|
(2,266 |
) |
Preferred and common stock |
|
|
9,960 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
11,290 |
|
|
|
(3,174 |
) |
|
|
21,250 |
|
|
|
(3,214 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,365,944 |
|
|
$ |
(30,506 |
) |
|
$ |
607,444 |
|
|
$ |
(14,697 |
) |
|
$ |
2,973,388 |
|
|
$ |
(45,203 |
) |
|
|
|
11
The Company has determined that the unrealized losses reflected above represent temporary
impairments. Eighty and sixty-one securities had unrealized losses for more than twelve months as
of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. The Company believes that the unrealized
losses generally are caused by liquidity discounts and risk premiums required by market
participants in response to temporary market conditions, rather than a fundamental weakness in the
credit quality of the issuer or underlying assets or changes in the expected cash flows from the
investments. Temporary market conditions at September 30, 2006 are primarily due to changes in
interest rates. The Company has both the intent and ability to hold these investments to maturity.
Of the $44.2 million of unrealized losses at September 30, 2006, $0.1 million relates to one
preferred stock and one asset-backed security,which each have an unrealized loss greater than 20
percent of amortized cost. These securities were evaluated considering factors such as the
financial condition and near and long-term prospects of the issuer and deemed to be temporarily
impaired. The remaining $44.1 million of unrealized losses at September 30, 2006 relates to
securities with an unrealized loss position of less than 20 percent of amortized cost, the degree
of which suggests that these securities do not pose a high risk of being or becoming other than
temporarily impaired. Of these securities, $35.6 million relates to unrealized losses on investment
grade fixed income securities. Investment grade is defined as a security having a Moodys
equivalent rating of Aaa, Aa, A or Baa or a Standard & Poors equivalent rating of AAA, AA, A or
BBB. The remaining $8.5 million is comprised of $7.4 million of U.S. government agency and
corporate fixed income securities and $1.1 million of asset-backed securities and residential
mortgage-backed securities.
In July 2006, the Company sold securities with a fair value of $259.7 million to one party (the
acquiring party) for a gain of less than $1.0 million. No restrictions or constraints as to the
future use of the securities were placed upon the acquiring party by the Company, nor was the
Company obligated under any scenario to repurchase securities from the acquiring party. In August
2006, the acquiring party sold securities totaling $646.8 million to a QSPE, including
substantially all of the securities originally purchased from the Company. The Company acquired
the preferred shares of the QSPE and accounts for this investment at fair value as an
available-for-sale investment in accordance with SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments
in Debt and Equity Securities. At September 30, 2006, the fair value of the preferred shares was
$7.8 million. In addition, a subsidiary of the Company will serve as the collateral advisor to the
QSPE, receiving certain fees and rights standard to a collateral advisor role. Activities
performed by the collateral advisor are significantly limited and are entirely defined by the legal
documents establishing the QSPE. For performing these activities, the collateral advisor receives
a quarterly fee equal to ten basis points on the fair value of the collateral. The collateral
advisor also received and recognized a one-time fee of $0.4 million in August 2006 for the
placement of the preferred shares of the QSPE.
The Company evaluated the sale of the securities under the accounting guidance of SFAS 140 to
determine if the transfer of securities to the acquiring party constituted a sale for accounting
purposes, as well as to determine if the subsequent placement of the sold securities into the QSPE
by the acquiring party would be deemed a transfer of securities by the Company to the QSPE. Based
upon the terms of the sale to the acquiring party and legal documents relating to the QSPE, the
Company determined that sale accounting was achieved upon transfer of the securities to the
acquiring party and that the Company was not a transferor of securities to the QSPE. The Company
then evaluated the accounting guidance of FIN 46R to determine whether the Company was required to
consolidate the QSPE. As the Company does not have the unilateral ability to liquidate the QSPE or
to change the entity so that it no longer meets the requirements of a QSPE through either its
ownership of the preferred shares or its subsidiarys role as collateral advisor, the Company is
not required to consolidate the QSPE.
6. Derivative Financial Instruments
The notional amount of the Companys swap agreements totaled $2.6 billion and $2.7 billion at
September 30, 2006, and December 31, 2005, with an average variable receive rate of 5.2 percent and
4.1 percent, respectively, and an average fixed pay rate of 4.3 percent and 4.2 percent,
respectively. The variable rate portion of the swaps is generally based on Treasury bill, Federal
Funds or 6 month LIBOR. As the swap payments are settled, the net difference between the fixed
amount the Company pays and the variable amount the Company receives is reflected in the
Consolidated Statements of Income through Interest expense for the debt swaps and through
Investment commissions expense for all other swaps. As of September 30, 2006, the Company
estimates that $9.3 million (net of tax) of the unrealized gain included in Accumulated other
comprehensive income in the Consolidated Balance Sheets will be recognized in the Consolidated
Statements of Income within the next twelve months as the swap payments are settled.
12
7. Sale of Receivables
The balance of sold receivables as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 was $367.9 million
and $299.9 million, respectively. The average receivables sold totaled $390.0 million and $385.9
million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively, and $387.9
million and $397.3 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively. The
expense of selling the agent receivables is included in the Consolidated Statements of Income in
Investment commissions expense and totaled $6.2 million and $17.7 million for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2006, respectively, and $4.5 million and $12.1 million for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively.
8. Income Taxes
The effective tax rate was 28.4 percent and 30.0 percent for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006, respectively, compared to 25.9 percent and 25.4 percent for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2005, respectively. The increase in the effective rate is due to tax
exempt investment income declining as a percentage of total pre-tax income. For the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2006, $1.7 million and $2.6 million, respectively, of tax reserves were
reversed due to closed tax audits or the expiration of statutes of limitations. The effective tax
rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, benefited from the reversal of $0.7
million and $2.8 million, respectively, of tax reserves that were deemed to be no longer needed due
to the expiration of statutes of limitations.
9. Stockholders Equity
As of September 30, 2006, the Company has 84,073,297 shares of common stock outstanding. During the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, the Company repurchased 580,000 shares and
1,534,050 shares, respectively, of its common stock at an average cost of $30.18 per share and
$30.14 per share, respectively. As of September 30, 2006, the Company has remaining authorization
to purchase up to 2,420,000 shares of its common stock. Following is a summary of common stock
issued and outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares issued |
|
|
88,556 |
|
|
|
88,556 |
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(3,702 |
) |
|
|
(2,701 |
) |
Restricted stock |
|
|
(325 |
) |
|
|
(693 |
) |
Shares held in employee equity trust, at cost |
|
|
(456 |
) |
|
|
(918 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding |
|
|
84,073 |
|
|
|
84,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following is a summary of treasury stock share activity during the nine months ended September 30,
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Shares |
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
2,701 |
|
Stock repurchases |
|
|
1,534 |
|
Submission of shares for withholding taxes upon exercise of stock
options and release of restricted stock, net of issuances |
|
|
(533 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2006 |
|
|
3,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has an employee equity trust (the Trust) used to fund the issuance of shares under
employee compensation and benefit plans. The fair value of the shares held by the Trust is recorded
in the Unearned employee benefits and other component in
the Consolidated Balance Sheets and is reduced as shares are released to fund employee benefits.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the Company released 461,639 shares upon the
exercise of stock options and the vesting of restricted stock. As of September 30, 2006, 456,393
shares of MoneyGram common stock remained in the Trust.
13
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Unrealized gain on securities classified as available-for-sale |
|
$ |
25,808 |
|
|
$ |
38,288 |
|
Unrealized gain on derivative financial instruments |
|
|
13,300 |
|
|
|
13,651 |
|
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
4,786 |
|
|
|
2,217 |
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment |
|
|
(42,331 |
) |
|
|
(42,331 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
$ |
1,563 |
|
|
$ |
11,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Pensions and Other Benefits
Net periodic pension cost for the defined benefit pension plan and the combined supplemental
executive retirement plans (SERPs) includes the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
480 |
|
|
$ |
473 |
|
|
$ |
1,441 |
|
|
$ |
1,419 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
2,896 |
|
|
|
2,830 |
|
|
|
8,689 |
|
|
|
8,490 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(2,231 |
) |
|
|
(2,151 |
) |
|
|
(6,694 |
) |
|
|
(6,453 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
1,023 |
|
|
|
3,241 |
|
|
|
3,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost |
|
$ |
2,401 |
|
|
$ |
2,354 |
|
|
$ |
7,204 |
|
|
$ |
7,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid through the defined benefit pension plan and the combined SERPs were $4.1
million and $4.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and
$12.1 million and $12.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. The Company made contributions to the defined benefit pension plan and the combined
SERPs totaling $14.0 million and $5.1 million during the three months ended September 30, 2006 and
2005, respectively, and $20.9 million and $13.7 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2006 and 2005, respectively.
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the defined benefit postretirement plans includes the
following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
$ |
155 |
|
|
$ |
478 |
|
|
$ |
464 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
(221 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost |
|
$ |
270 |
|
|
$ |
246 |
|
|
$ |
811 |
|
|
$ |
738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid through, and contributions made to, the defined benefit postretirement plan were less
than $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $0.1
million and $0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
14
The Company incurred expenses for and made contributions to the 401(k) defined contribution plan
totaling $0.8 million and $0.6 million during the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, and $2.1 million and $1.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and
2005, respectively. In addition, the Company made a discretionary profit sharing contribution to
the 401(k) defined contribution plan totaling $2.1 million and $1.9 million during the nine months
ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
11. Debt
On September 30, 2006, the interest rate under the Companys bank credit facility was 5.9 percent,
exclusive of the effect of commitment fees and other costs, and the facility fee was 0.125 percent.
At September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the interest rate debt swaps used to hedge the cash
flows of our variable rate debt had an average variable receive rate of 4.6 percent and 3.9
percent, respectively, and an average fixed pay rate of 4.3 percent for both periods. See Note 6
for further information regarding the Companys portfolio of derivative financial instruments.
12. Stock-Based Compensation
Option awards are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Companys common
stock on the date of grant. Stock options granted in 2006 become exercisable over a three-year
period in an equal number of shares each year and have a term of ten years. For purposes of
determining the fair value of stock option awards, the Company uses the Black-Scholes single option
pricing model and the assumptions set forth in the following table. Expected volatility is based on
the historical volatility of the price of the Companys common stock since the spin-off on June 30,
2004. The Company uses historical information to estimate option exercise and employee termination
within the valuation model. The expected term of options granted is derived from the output of the
option valuation model and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be
outstanding. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on
the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. Compensation cost is recognized using
a straight-line method over the vesting or service period and is net of estimated forfeitures. The
weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted during 2006 and 2005 was $10.38 and
$5.95, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
26.5 |
% |
|
|
24.1 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
Expected life |
|
6.5 years |
|
5 years |
Following is a summary of stock option activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Term |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
(in years) |
|
|
($000) |
|
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
4,883,262 |
|
|
$ |
18.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
405,040 |
|
|
|
27.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,031,223 |
) |
|
|
31.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(62,878 |
) |
|
|
19.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at September 30, 2006 |
|
|
4,194,201 |
|
|
$ |
19.50 |
|
|
|
5.24 |
|
|
$ |
40,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at September 30, 2006 |
|
|
3,222,080 |
|
|
$ |
18.49 |
|
|
|
4.60 |
|
|
$ |
34,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
The Company has granted both restricted stock and performance-based restricted stock. The vesting
of restricted stock is typically three years from the date of grant. The vesting of
performance-based restricted stock is contingent upon the Company obtaining certain financial
thresholds established on the grant date. Provided the incentive performance targets established in
the year of grant are achieved, the performance-based restricted stock awards granted subsequent to
2002 will vest in a three-year period from the date of grant in an equal number of shares each
year. Vesting could accelerate if performance targets are met at certain achievement levels. Future
vesting in all cases is subject generally to continued employment with MoneyGram or MoneyGrams
former parent company, Viad Corp. Holders of restricted stock and performance-based restricted
stock have the right to receive dividends and vote the shares, but may not sell, assign, transfer,
pledge or otherwise encumber the stock. Restricted stock awards are valued at the quoted market
price of the Companys common stock on the date of grant and expensed using the straight-line
method over the vesting or service period of the award, net of estimated forfeitures. Following is
a summary of restricted stock activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value |
|
Restricted stock outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
692,939 |
|
|
$ |
18.28 |
|
Granted |
|
|
114,570 |
|
|
|
27.71 |
|
Vested and issued |
|
|
(472,183 |
) |
|
|
17.60 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(10,769 |
) |
|
|
19.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock outstanding at September 30, 2006 |
|
|
324,557 |
|
|
$ |
23.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following is a summary of pertinent information related to the Companys stock-based awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Fair value of options vesting during period |
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
5,646 |
|
|
$ |
9,953 |
|
Fair value of restricted stock vesting during period |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,369 |
|
|
|
9,916 |
|
Expense recognized related to options |
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
1,821 |
|
|
|
1,768 |
|
Expense recognized related to restricted stock |
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
1,561 |
|
|
|
1,924 |
|
Intrinsic value of options exercised |
|
|
3,318 |
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
14,323 |
|
|
|
2,179 |
|
Cash received from option exercises |
|
|
2,964 |
|
|
|
3,322 |
|
|
|
20,192 |
|
|
|
5,956 |
|
Tax benefit realized for tax deductions from option exercises |
|
|
1,171 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
4,936 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
As of September 30, 2006, the Companys unvested stock-based awards had the following unrecognized
compensation expense and remaining vesting periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Options |
|
Stock |
|
Unrecognized compensation expense |
|
$ |
5,331 |
|
|
$ |
3,268 |
|
Remaining weighted average vesting period |
|
2.18 years |
|
1.86 years |
As of September 30, 2006, the Company has remaining authorization to issue awards of up to
6,931,390 shares of common stock under its 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan.
16
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, options to purchase 392,563 and 326,930
shares of common stock, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per
share because the effect would be antidilutive. For the three and nine months ended September 30,
2005, options to purchase 1,098,280 and 1,444,989 shares of common stock, respectively, were
excluded in the diluted earnings per share calculation. Options are generally antidilutive if the
exercise price of the option is greater than the average market price of the Companys common stock
for the period presented.
13. Commitments and Contingencies
At September 30, 2006, we had available reverse repurchase agreements, letters of credit and
overdraft facilities totaling $2.3 billion, including a $1.0 billion reverse repurchase agreement
with one clearing bank. At September 30, 2006, $11.1 million was outstanding under letters of
credit.
As of September 30, 2006, the total amount of unfunded commitments related to investments in
limited partnerships was $5.2 million.
14. New Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting
Changes and Error Corrections, which replaces Accounting Principles Board (APB) No. 20,
Accounting Changes, and SFAS No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements.
This statement requires that an entity apply the retrospective method in reporting a change in an
accounting principle or the reporting entity. The standard only allows for a change in accounting
principle if it is required by a newly issued accounting pronouncement or the entity can justify
the use of an allowable alternative accounting principle on the basis that it is preferable. This
statement also requires that corrections for errors discovered in prior period financial statements
be reported as a prior period adjustment by restating the prior period financial statements.
Additional disclosures are required when a change in accounting principle or reporting entity
occurs, as well as when a correction for an error is reported. The statement is effective for the
Company for fiscal 2006. The adoption of this SFAS did not have a material impact to the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
In January 2006, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 45-3, Application of FASB
Interpretation No. (FIN) 45 to Minimum Revenue Guarantees Granted to a Business or Its Owners.
This FSP amends FIN 45 to include guarantees granted to a business that its revenue for a specified
period of time will be at least a specified amount. FIN 45 requires that a company record an
obligation at the inception of a guarantee equal to the fair value of the guarantee, as well as
disclose certain information relating to the guarantee. The FSP is applicable for minimum revenue
guarantees issued or modified by the Company on or after January 1, 2006, with no revision or
restatement to the accounting treatment of such guarantees issued prior to the adoption date
allowed. The disclosure requirements of FIN 45 are applicable to all outstanding minimum revenue
guarantees. The Company has adopted this FSP effective January 1, 2006 with no material impact to
the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In February 2006, the FASB issued FSP No. 123R-4, Classification of Options and Similar Instruments
Issued as Employee Compensation That Allow for Cash Settlement upon the Occurrence of a Contingent
Event. This FSP amends SFAS No. 123R, Share Based Payment, to require that stock options issued to
employees as compensation be accounted for as equity instruments until a contingent event allowing
for cash settlement is probable of occurring. The Company has adopted this FSP effective January 1,
2006 with no material impact to the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FIN 48 is an
interpretation of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition
threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a
tax position taken or expected to be taken in an entitys tax return. This interpretation also
provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure, and transition of tax positions. This FIN is effective January 1, 2007 for
MoneyGram. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, of this pronouncement on its
consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This statement does not
require any new fair value measurements, but it provides guidance on how to measure fair value
under other accounting pronouncements. SFAS 157 also
establishes a fair value hierarchy to classify the source of information used in fair value
measurements. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair
value into three broad categories. This standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2008.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this pronouncement on its consolidated financial
statements.
17
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension
and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132. This
standard requires the recognition of the funded status of a pension or postretirement plan in the
balance sheet as an asset or liability. Unrecognized prior service costs and gains and losses are
recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income. SFAS 158 does not change previous guidance for
income statement recognition. The standard requires the plan assets and benefit obligations to be
measured as of the annual balance sheet date of the Company. Prospective application of this
standard is required. The recognition and disclosure provisions of SFAS 158 are effective for the
Companys 2006 year-end, while the change in measurement date is effective for the Companys 2008
year-end. The Company does not believe the adoption of this standard will have a material impact
to the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 108, which expresses the SEC
Staffs views regarding the process of quantifying financial statement misstatements. The SAB
provides for a one-time cumulative effect transition adjustment to correct for misstatements that
are now considered material as a result of implementing SAB 108. This SAB is effective for the
Companys 2006 year-end. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, of SAB 108 on its
consolidated financial statements.
15. Minimum Commission Guarantees
In limited circumstances as an incentive to new or renewing agents, the Company may grant minimum
commission guarantees to an agent for a specified period of time at a contractually specified
amount. Under the guarantees, the Company will pay to the agent the difference between the
contractually specified minimum commission and the actual commissions earned by the agent.
As of September 30, 2006, the minimum commission guarantees had a maximum payment of $23.6 million
over a weighted average remaining term of 3.5 years. The maximum payment is calculated as the
contractually guaranteed minimum commission times the remaining term of the contract and,
therefore, assumes that the agent generates no money transfer transactions during the remainder of
its contract. However, under the terms of certain agent contracts, the Company may terminate the
contract if the projected or actual volume of transactions falls beneath a contractually specified
amount. In fiscal 2005, the Company paid $2.5 million under these guarantees, or approximately 50
percent of the estimated maximum payment for the year.
16. Segment Information
Our business is conducted through two reportable segments, Global Funds Transfer and Payment
Systems, which are determined based upon factors such as the type of customers, the nature of
products and services provided and the distribution channels used to provide those services. The
following table reconciles segment operating income to the income from continuing operations before
income taxes as reported in the financial statements:
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Funds Transfer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money transfer, including bill payment |
|
$ |
176,220 |
|
|
$ |
132,802 |
|
|
$ |
483,125 |
|
|
$ |
368,644 |
|
Retail money orders |
|
|
37,231 |
|
|
|
34,695 |
|
|
|
115,333 |
|
|
|
105,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Global Funds Transfer |
|
|
213,451 |
|
|
|
167,497 |
|
|
|
598,458 |
|
|
|
474,385 |
|
Payment Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Official check and payment processing |
|
|
74,883 |
|
|
|
72,404 |
|
|
|
230,870 |
|
|
|
220,104 |
|
Other |
|
|
7,585 |
|
|
|
6,484 |
|
|
|
23,159 |
|
|
|
19,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Payment Systems |
|
|
82,468 |
|
|
|
78,888 |
|
|
|
254,029 |
|
|
|
239,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
296,431 |
|
|
$ |
246,385 |
|
|
$ |
853,016 |
|
|
$ |
714,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Funds Transfer |
|
$ |
38,566 |
|
|
$ |
35,230 |
|
|
$ |
119,275 |
|
|
$ |
91,340 |
|
Payment Systems |
|
|
7,539 |
|
|
|
7,717 |
|
|
|
34,068 |
|
|
|
32,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income |
|
|
46,105 |
|
|
|
42,947 |
|
|
|
153,343 |
|
|
|
123,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
2,003 |
|
|
|
1,697 |
|
|
|
5,925 |
|
|
|
5,694 |
|
Other unallocated expenses |
|
|
2,142 |
|
|
|
2,376 |
|
|
|
7,952 |
|
|
|
7,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
41,960 |
|
|
$ |
38,874 |
|
|
$ |
139,466 |
|
|
$ |
110,836 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
The following table presents depreciation and amortization expense and capital expenditures by
segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Funds Transfer |
|
$ |
9,464 |
|
|
$ |
7,101 |
|
|
$ |
25,008 |
|
|
$ |
20,075 |
|
Payment Systems |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
3,189 |
|
|
|
3,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
10,419 |
|
|
$ |
8,102 |
|
|
$ |
28,197 |
|
|
$ |
23,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Funds Transfer |
|
$ |
15,599 |
|
|
$ |
6,446 |
|
|
$ |
48,345 |
|
|
$ |
30,635 |
|
Payment Systems |
|
|
1,503 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
8,954 |
|
|
|
1,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures |
|
$ |
17,102 |
|
|
$ |
6,877 |
|
|
$ |
57,299 |
|
|
$ |
32,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
The following table presents revenue by major geographic area:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
233,406 |
|
|
$ |
196,597 |
|
|
$ |
681,836 |
|
|
$ |
571,398 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
63,025 |
|
|
|
49,788 |
|
|
|
171,180 |
|
|
|
142,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
296,431 |
|
|
$ |
246,385 |
|
|
$ |
853,016 |
|
|
$ |
714,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with MoneyGram International, Inc.s
(MoneyGram, the Company, we, us and our) consolidated financial statements and related
notes. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.
MoneyGrams actual results could differ materially from those anticipated due to various factors
discussed under Forward-Looking Statements and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report.
Highlights
Third quarter 2006 results reflect:
|
|
|
Global Funds Transfer segment revenue growth of 27 percent compared to the third quarter
2005, driven by 40 percent growth of money transfer transaction volume and 33 percent
growth of money transfer revenue. |
|
|
|
|
Fee and other revenue of $200.9 million, up 28 percent from the third quarter of 2005,
driven by the growth in money transfer transaction volume. |
|
|
|
|
Net investment margin of 2.07 percent as compared to 1.82 percent in the third quarter
of 2005, as shown in Table 4. |
20
Table 1 Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
(%) |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
(%) |
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee and other revenue |
|
$ |
200,894 |
|
|
$ |
156,375 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
$ |
556,862 |
|
|
$ |
444,173 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Investment revenue |
|
|
96,406 |
|
|
|
91,634 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
297,882 |
|
|
|
272,188 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Net securities (losses) gains |
|
|
(869 |
) |
|
|
(1,624 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
(1,728 |
) |
|
|
(2,060 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
296,431 |
|
|
|
246,385 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
853,016 |
|
|
|
714,301 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
Fee commissions expense |
|
|
83,144 |
|
|
|
58,940 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
226,246 |
|
|
|
167,344 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Investment commissions expense |
|
|
63,520 |
|
|
|
60,889 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
185,346 |
|
|
|
177,656 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commissions expense |
|
|
146,664 |
|
|
|
119,829 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
411,592 |
|
|
|
345,000 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
|
149,767 |
|
|
|
126,556 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
441,424 |
|
|
|
369,301 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
44,753 |
|
|
|
35,180 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
128,473 |
|
|
|
97,745 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Transaction and operations support |
|
|
41,318 |
|
|
|
34,547 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
112,615 |
|
|
|
106,733 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
10,419 |
|
|
|
8,102 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
28,197 |
|
|
|
23,187 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Occupancy, equipment and supplies |
|
|
9,314 |
|
|
|
8,156 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
26,748 |
|
|
|
25,106 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
2,003 |
|
|
|
1,697 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
5,925 |
|
|
|
5,694 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
107,807 |
|
|
|
87,682 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
301,958 |
|
|
|
258,465 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
41,960 |
|
|
|
38,874 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
139,466 |
|
|
|
110,836 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
11,922 |
|
|
|
10,076 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
41,787 |
|
|
|
28,185 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
30,038 |
|
|
|
28,798 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
97,679 |
|
|
|
82,651 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Income and gain from discontinued
operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
740 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
740 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
30,038 |
|
|
$ |
29,538 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
97,679 |
|
|
$ |
83,391 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM = Not meaningful
21
Table 2 Results of Operations as a Percentage of Total Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee and other revenue |
|
|
68 |
% |
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
62 |
% |
Investment revenue |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
Net securities (losses) gains |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
-1 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee commissions expense |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
Investment commissions expense |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total commissions expense |
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
|
51 |
% |
|
|
51 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
Transaction and operations support |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
Occupancy, equipment and supplies |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
Income and gain from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
NM = Not meaningful
For the third quarter of 2006, revenue growth of 20 percent and net revenue growth of 18 percent
over the third quarter of 2005 was primarily due to growth in money transfer transaction volume.
Expenses increased 23 percent over the third quarter of 2005, which reflects higher transaction
volumes, additional headcount to support growth, compensation merit increases, increased marketing
expenditures and amortization of intangible assets acquired through our purchase of MoneyExpress.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, revenue increased by 19 percent and net revenue by 20
percent over 2005 due to growth in the money transfer business. Expenses for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 increased 17 percent over 2005, driven by higher transaction volumes, additional
headcount to support the growth in the business, compensation merit increases, increased marketing
expenditures, and intangible assets acquired through our purchase of MoneyExpress.
22
Table 3 Net Fee Revenue Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2006 vs |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2006 vs |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Fee and other revenue |
|
$ |
200,894 |
|
|
$ |
156,375 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
$ |
556,862 |
|
|
$ |
444,173 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
Fee commissions expense |
|
|
83,144 |
|
|
|
58,940 |
|
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
226,246 |
|
|
|
167,344 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net fee revenue |
|
$ |
117,750 |
|
|
$ |
97,435 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
$ |
330,616 |
|
|
$ |
276,829 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions as a % of fee and other revenue |
|
|
41.4 |
% |
|
|
37.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.6 |
% |
|
|
37.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Fee and other revenue includes fees on money transfer transactions, money orders and, to a
lesser extent, official check transactions, and is a growing portion of our total revenue,
increasing to 68 percent of total revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2006 from 63
percent for the same period of 2005. Fee and other revenue for the three months and nine months
ended September 30, 2006 increased by 28 percent and 25 percent, respectively, compared to the same
periods in the prior year, primarily driven by growth of 40 percent and 43 percent, respectively,
in money transfer transaction volume. The revenue growth rate for 2006 is lower than the money
transfer volume growth rate due primarily to simplified pricing initiatives and the mix of
transaction origination in the money transfer business. Our simplified pricing initiatives include
reducing the number of pricing tiers or bands and allow us to manage our price-volume dynamic while
streamlining the point of sale process for our agents and customers. Our pricing philosophy
continues to be to maintain a price point below our higher priced competitor but above the niche
players in the market. Our domestically originated transactions, which contribute lower revenue per
transaction, are growing at a faster rate than internationally originated transactions.
Fee commissions consist primarily of fees paid to our third-party agents for the money transfer
service. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, fee commissions expense increased
41 percent and 35 percent, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2005, primarily driven
by higher money transfer transaction volume and tiered commissions. Tiered commissions are
commission rates that are adjusted upward as an agents transaction volume grows. We use tiered
commission rates as an incentive for our agents to grow transaction volume by paying our agents for
performance and allowing them to participate in adding market share for MoneyGram.
Net fee revenue increased $20.3 million, or 21 percent, in the third quarter of 2006 as compared to
2005, and increased $53.8 million, or 19 percent, for the nine month period in 2006 over 2005. The
increase in net fee revenue is driven by the increase in money transfer transactions. Growth in net
fee revenue was less than fee and other revenue growth primarily due to the growth in the money
transfer service, which has a lower revenue margin than money orders and lower fee revenue from our
payments systems products.
23
Table
4 Net Investment Revenue Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
2006 vs |
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
2006 vs |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of net investment revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment revenue |
|
$ |
96,406 |
|
|
$ |
91,634 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
$ |
297,882 |
|
|
$ |
272,188 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Investment commissions expense (1) |
|
|
(63,520 |
) |
|
|
(60,889 |
) |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
(185,346 |
) |
|
|
(177,656 |
) |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment revenue |
|
$ |
32,886 |
|
|
$ |
30,745 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
$ |
112,536 |
|
|
$ |
94,532 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balances: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents and investments |
|
$ |
6,297,739 |
|
|
$ |
6,707,017 |
|
|
|
($409,278 |
) |
|
$ |
6,357,165 |
|
|
$ |
6,750,129 |
|
|
|
($392,964 |
) |
Payment service obligations (2) |
|
|
4,743,030 |
|
|
|
5,255,146 |
|
|
|
(512,116 |
) |
|
|
4,813,544 |
|
|
|
5,297,765 |
|
|
|
(484,221 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average yields earned and rates paid (3): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment yield |
|
|
6.07 |
% |
|
|
5.42 |
% |
|
|
0.65 |
% |
|
|
6.26 |
% |
|
|
5.39 |
% |
|
|
0.87 |
% |
Investment commission rate |
|
|
5.31 |
% |
|
|
4.60 |
% |
|
|
0.71 |
% |
|
|
5.15 |
% |
|
|
4.48 |
% |
|
|
0.67 |
% |
Net investment margin |
|
|
2.07 |
% |
|
|
1.82 |
% |
|
|
0.25 |
% |
|
|
2.37 |
% |
|
|
1.87 |
% |
|
|
0.50 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Investment commissions expense includes payments made to financial institution customers
based on short-term interest rate indices applied to the outstanding balances of official
checks sold by that financial institution, as well as costs associated with swaps and the sale
of receivables program. |
|
(2) |
|
Commissions are paid to financial institution customers based upon average outstanding
balances generated by the sale of official checks only. The average balance in the table
reflects only the payment service obligations for which commissions are paid and does not
include the average balance of the sold receivables ($390.0 million and $387.9 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $385.9 million and $397.3
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively) as these are not
recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
|
(3) |
|
Average yields/rates are calculated by dividing the applicable amount shown in the
Components of net investment revenue section by the applicable amount shown in the Average
balances section, divided by the number of days in the period presented and multiplied by the
number of days in the year. The Net investment margin is calculated by dividing Net
investment revenue by the Cash equivalents and investments average balance, divided by the
number of days in the period presented and multiplied by the number of days in the year. |
Investment revenue increased five percent and nine percent in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2005 due to higher yields on the
portfolio, partially offset by lower investable balances. Investment revenue for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006 includes $12.4 million of cash flow recoveries on previously impaired
investments and income from limited partnership interests, while the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2005 includes $3.9 million and $15.0 million, respectively, of cash flow recoveries
from previously impaired investments and income from limited partnerships. No such items were
recognized during the three months ended September 30, 2006. The limited partnership interests are
accounted for under the equity method.
Investment commissions expense increased four percent in the three and nine months ended September
30, 2006 compared to the same periods in 2005 as rising short-term rates resulted in higher
commissions paid to financial institution customers and higher costs associated with our sale of
receivables program. The impact of rising rates was significantly offset by lower swap costs.
Net investment revenue increased seven percent and 19 percent, respectively, in the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the prior year, with the net investment margin
increasing to 2.07 percent and 2.37 percent, respectively, as compared to 1.82 percent and 1.87
percent, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005. This growth is
attributable to the higher yields and lower swap costs.
24
Table 5 Summary of Gains, Losses and Impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized gains |
|
$ |
1,552 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
1,492 |
|
|
$ |
4,399 |
|
|
$ |
7,544 |
|
|
$ |
(3,145 |
) |
Gross realized losses |
|
|
(1,330 |
) |
|
|
(372 |
) |
|
|
(958 |
) |
|
|
(2,598 |
) |
|
|
(4,864 |
) |
|
|
2,266 |
|
Other-than-temporary impairments |
|
|
(1,091 |
) |
|
|
(1,312 |
) |
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
(3,529 |
) |
|
|
(4,740 |
) |
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net securities losses |
|
$ |
(869 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,624 |
) |
|
$ |
755 |
|
|
$ |
(1,728 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,060 |
) |
|
$ |
332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net securities losses decreased from $1.6 million and $2.1 million in the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2005, respectively, to $0.9 million and $1.7 million in the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively. The Company recognized impairments of $1.1
million and $3.5 million related to investments backed by automobile, aircraft and manufactured
housing collateral in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively. For the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, the Company recognized impairments of $1.3 million
and $4.7 million, respectively, related to investments backed by aircraft collateral.
Expenses
Compensation and benefits Compensation and benefits includes salaries and benefits, management
incentive programs, severance costs and other employee related costs. Compensation and benefits
increased 27 percent and 31 percent in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared
to the same periods in 2005 due to higher headcount supporting the growth of the money transfer
business, annual merit increases and higher stock-based incentive compensation accruals. We expect
compensation and benefits to continue to increase over the remainder of 2006 compared to 2005 due
to additional headcount from growth and the Money Express acquisition.
Transaction and operations support Transaction and operations support expenses include marketing,
professional fees and other outside services, telecommunications and forms expense. Transaction and
operations support costs increased 20 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2006
compared to the same period in 2005 due to increased marketing expenditures and professional fees.
Marketing expenditures increased due to higher volumes and marketing activity throughout the agent
network.
Transaction and operations support costs increased six percent in the nine months ended September
30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005 due to increased marketing expenditures and
professional fees, partially offset by lower agent credit losses. We incurred higher professional
services costs primarily due to on-going compliance initiatives, software development and other
projects. As 2005 was our first year of reporting under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we
expect that our Section 404 costs in 2006 will be lower as the initiatives undertaken in 2005
become integrated into our daily activities. However, we continue to see a trend among state and
federal regulators of banks and other financial services businesses toward greater scrutiny of
anti-money laundering compliance. As we continue to add staff resources and enhancements to our
technology systems to address this trend, our transaction expenses will likely increase. In
addition, we anticipate that our transaction expenses will continue to increase compared to 2005
due to marketing spend, integration of Money Express, investment in the agent network and
development of our retail network in Western Europe. During the nine months ended September 30,
2005, the Company incurred $2.2 million of costs related to the settlement of one legal matter and
the accrual for an expected settlement in another legal matter.
Depreciation and amortization Depreciation and amortization includes depreciation on point of
sale equipment, computer hardware and software (including capitalized software development costs),
office furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, as well as amortization of our intangible
assets. Depreciation and amortization expense for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2006, increased 29 percent and 22 percent, respectively, over the same periods in 2005 due to the
amortization of acquired intangible assets and depreciation of capitalized software and hardware
acquired in 2005 to enhance our product platforms and help drive growth. We expect depreciation
and amortization expense to increase compared to 2005 due to the intangible assets resulting from
the acquisition of Money Express and continued investment in product platforms.
25
Occupancy, equipment and supplies Occupancy, equipment and supplies includes facilities rent and
maintenance costs, software and equipment maintenance costs, freight and delivery costs, and
supplies. Occupancy, equipment and supplies expense for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2006 increased 14 percent and seven percent, respectively, over the comparable 2005 periods as
we had higher supplies expense, office rent, software expense and maintenance and equipment
maintenance. Software expense and maintenance increases relate primarily to purchased licenses to
support our growth and compliance initiatives. Office rent has increased due to normal annual
increases and expanded locations. Equipment maintenance and supplies expenses have increased in
connection with the growth in our agent locations.
Interest expense Interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006
increased 18 percent and four percent, respectively, over the same 2005 periods due to rising
interest rates, partially offset by receipts under our cash flow hedges. In the nine months ended
September 30, 2005, we amended our bank credit facility and expensed $0.9 million of unamortized
financing costs relating to the original facility.
Income taxes The effective tax rate was 28.4 percent and 30.0 percent for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2006, respectively, compared to 25.9 percent and 25.4 percent for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively. The increase in the effective rate
is due to tax exempt investment income declining as a percentage of total pre-tax income. As tax
exempt income becomes a smaller percentage of total income, our marginal tax rate will increase.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, $1.7 million and $2.6 million,
respectively, of tax reserves were reversed due to closed tax audits or the expiration of statutes
of limitations. The effective tax rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005,
benefited from the reversal of $0.7 million and $2.8 million, respectively, of tax reserves that
were deemed to be no longer needed due to the expiration of statutes of limitations.
Acquisition
On May 31, 2006, MoneyGram completed the acquisition of Money Express, the Companys former super
agent in Italy. In connection with the acquisition, the Company formed MoneyGram Payment Systems
Italy, a wholly-owned subsidiary, to operate the former Money Express network. The acquisition
provides the Company with the opportunity for further network expansion and more control of
marketing and promotional activities in the region. The operating results of Money Express
subsequent to May 31, 2006 are included in the Companys consolidated statement of income.
MoneyGram acquired Money Express for $15.0. million, subject to purchase price adjustments. The
acquisition cost includes $1.3 million of transaction costs and the forgiveness of $0.7 million of
liabilities. During the third quarter of 2006, the Company received a purchase price adjustment of
$6.0 million. The Company is in the process of finalizing the valuation of intangible assets and
deferred taxes from this acquisition, among other items, which may result in adjustment to the
purchase price allocation. Purchased intangible assets of $7.3 million, consisting primarily of
agent contracts and a non-compete agreement, will be amortized over useful lives ranging from 3 to
5 years. Preliminary goodwill of $15.3 million was recorded and assigned to our Global Funds
Transfer segment.
Segment Performance
We measure financial performance by our two business segments Global Funds Transfer and Payment
Systems. The business segments are determined based upon factors such as the type of customers, the
nature of products and services provided and the distribution channels used to provide those
services. Through our agent network, the Global Funds Transfer segment primarily provides our
retail consumers with money transfer services and domestic money orders, as well as bill payment
services. The Payment Systems segment primarily provides official check services and money orders
for financial institutions, as well as controlled disbursements processing for our business
customers. Segment pre-tax operating income and segment operating margin are used to evaluate
performance and allocate resources.
We manage our investment portfolio on a consolidated level and the specific investment securities
are not identifiable to a particular segment. However, average investable balances are allocated to
our segments based upon the average balances generated by that segments sale of payment
instruments. The investment yield is primarily allocated based upon the total average investment
yield. Gains and losses are allocated based upon the allocation of average investable balances. Our
derivatives portfolio is also managed on a consolidated level and the derivative instruments are
not specifically identifiable to a particular segment. The total costs associated with our
derivatives portfolio are allocated to each segment based upon the percentage of that segments
average investable balances to the total average investable balances. Table 6 reconciles segment
operating income to income from continuing operations before income taxes as reported in the
financial statements.
26
Table 6 Segment Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Funds Transfer |
|
$ |
38,566 |
|
|
$ |
35,230 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
$ |
119,275 |
|
|
$ |
91,340 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
Payment Systems |
|
|
7,539 |
|
|
|
7,717 |
|
|
|
-2 |
% |
|
|
34,068 |
|
|
|
32,385 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating income |
|
|
46,105 |
|
|
|
42,947 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
153,343 |
|
|
|
123,725 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
2,003 |
|
|
|
1,697 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
5,925 |
|
|
|
5,694 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Other unallocated expenses |
|
|
2,142 |
|
|
|
2,376 |
|
|
|
-10 |
% |
|
|
7,952 |
|
|
|
7,195 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing
operations before income taxes |
|
$ |
41,960 |
|
|
$ |
38,874 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
$ |
139,466 |
|
|
$ |
110,836 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other unallocated expense represents pension and benefit obligation expense, as well as
interim service fees paid to MoneyGrams former parent Viad Corp (Viad). As part of our 2004
spin-off from Viad, we entered into an Interim Services Agreement which provides for services to be
provided by Viad on an interim basis. We were obligated under this Interim Services Agreement to
pay approximately $1.6 million annually, or $0.4 million quarterly, beginning July 1, 2004. We
terminated certain services under the Interim Services Agreement effective on September 28, 2005
and terminated substantially all remaining services effective in the
second quarter of 2006. As a result of this termination, our payments to Viad were $0.3 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
Table 7 Global Funds Transfer Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30 , |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30 , |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money transfer revenue |
|
$ |
176,220 |
|
|
$ |
132,802 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
$ |
483,125 |
|
|
$ |
368,644 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
Retail money orders |
|
|
37,231 |
|
|
|
34,695 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
115,333 |
|
|
|
105,741 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
213,451 |
|
|
|
167,497 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
598,458 |
|
|
|
474,385 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions |
|
|
(87,942 |
) |
|
|
(63,736 |
) |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
(240,439 |
) |
|
|
(181,201 |
) |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
125,509 |
|
|
$ |
103,761 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
$ |
358,019 |
|
|
$ |
293,184 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
38,566 |
|
|
|
35,230 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
119,275 |
|
|
|
91,340 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
Operating margin |
|
|
18.1 |
% |
|
|
21.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.9 |
% |
|
|
19.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Global Funds Transfer revenue includes investment revenue, securities gains and losses and
fees on money transfers, retail money orders and bill payment products. Global Funds Transfer
revenue increased 27 percent and 26 percent in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006,
respectively, over the same periods in 2005, primarily driven by the growth in money transfer
volume and higher yields on the money order investment portfolio. Money transfer volumes grew 40
percent and 43 percent in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively, and
money transfer revenue grew 33 percent and 31 percent in the three and nine months ended September
30, 2006, respectively. Money transfer revenue growth rates are lower than volume growth rates due
to simplified pricing initiatives and the mix of transaction origination in the money transfer
business. Our domestically originated transactions, which contribute lower revenue per transaction,
grew 46 percent and 49 percent in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively,
while transactions originated outside of North America grew 30 percent and 29 percent,
respectively. Our transaction volume to Mexico grew 29 percent and 32 percent, respectively, in
the three and nine months ended September, 30, 2006 compared to the same periods in 2005. Our
agent network grew 24 percent to over 104,000 agent locations from the third quarter of 2005 to the
third quarter of 2006. As expected, retail money order volume declined six and four percent in the
three
and nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the same periods in 2005, consistent with the
overall trend of paper-based payment instruments.
27
Investment revenue in Global Funds Transfer increased 15 percent and 21 percent in the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2005, primarily
due to higher interest rates earned on the investment portfolio. Global Funds Transfer realized
$2.8 million of pre-tax cash flows from previously impaired investments and income from limited
partnership interests in the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and $0.8 million and $2.3 million
in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively. No such items were recognized
during the three months ended September 30, 2006.
Commissions expense consists of fees paid to our third-party agents for the money transfer service
and costs associated with swaps and the sale of receivables program. Commissions expense for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 increased 38 percent and 33 percent, respectively,
compared to 2005 periods, primarily driven by the transaction volume growth in money transfer and
tiered commission rates. Tiered commissions are commission rates that are adjusted upward as an
agents transaction volume grows. We use tiered commission rates as an incentive for our agents to
grow transaction volume by paying our agents for performance and allowing them to participate in
adding market share for MoneyGram. Commissions expense as a percentage of revenue increased from
38 percent in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 to 41 percent and 40 percent in
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively, due to product mix as the money
transfer business, the primary source of commissions, continues to comprise a larger percent of the
revenue of Global Funds Transfer, as well as tiered commission rates.
Operating margin was 18.1 percent and 19.9 percent for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2006, respectively, while the operating margin was 21.0 percent and 19.3 percent for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively. The decrease in operating margin is due to
the development of our retail network in Western Europe and increased marketing spend offset by
higher yields on the money order investment portfolio and lower agent credit losses. We expect our
operating margin to decline in the last quarter of 2006 due to increased marketing spend,
integration costs from the Money Express acquisition, investment in the agent network and the
continued development of our retail network in Western Europe.
Table 8 Payment Systems Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Official check and payment processing |
|
$ |
74,883 |
|
|
$ |
72,404 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
$ |
230,870 |
|
|
$ |
220,104 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Other revenue |
|
|
7,585 |
|
|
|
6,484 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
23,159 |
|
|
|
19,812 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
82,468 |
|
|
|
78,888 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
254,029 |
|
|
|
239,916 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Commissions |
|
|
(58,722 |
) |
|
|
(56,091 |
) |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
(171,153 |
) |
|
|
(163,797 |
) |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
23,746 |
|
|
$ |
22,797 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
$ |
82,876 |
|
|
$ |
76,119 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
7,539 |
|
|
|
7,717 |
|
|
|
-2 |
% |
|
|
34,068 |
|
|
|
32,385 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Operating margin |
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.4 |
% |
|
|
13.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Taxable equivalent basis (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
86,812 |
|
|
$ |
83,786 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
$ |
267,164 |
|
|
$ |
254,252 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Commissions |
|
|
(58,722 |
) |
|
|
(56,091 |
) |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
(171,153 |
) |
|
|
(163,797 |
) |
|
|
4 |
% |
Operating income |
|
|
11,883 |
|
|
|
12,616 |
|
|
|
-6 |
% |
|
|
47,204 |
|
|
|
46,721 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Operating margin |
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
15.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.7 |
% |
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The taxable equivalent basis numbers are non-GAAP measures that are used by the Companys
management to evaluate the effect of tax-exempt securities on the Payment Systems segment. The
tax-exempt investments in the investment portfolio have lower pre-tax yields but produce
higher income on an after-tax basis than comparable taxable investments. An adjustment is made
to present revenue and operating income resulting from amounts invested in tax-exempt
securities on a taxable equivalent basis. The adjustment is calculated using a 35 percent tax
rate and is $4.3 million and $4.9 million for the third quarter of 2006 and 2005,
respectively, and $13.1 million and $14.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006
and 2005, respectively. The presentation of taxable equivalent basis numbers is supplemental
to results presented under GAAP and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by
other companies. These non-GAAP measures should be used in addition to, but not as a
substitute for measures presented under GAAP. |
28
Payment Systems revenue includes investment revenue, securities gains and losses, fees charged to
our official check financial institution customers and fees earned on our rebate processing
business. Revenue increased five percent and six percent for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006, respectively, compared to prior periods, primarily due to higher investment
income from higher short-term interest rates. Included in investment revenue for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006 is $9.6 million of pretax cash flows from previously impaired investments
and income from limited partnership interests, compared to $3.1 million and $11.9 million for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively. No such items were recognized for
the three months ended September 30, 2006. Revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2005
included $2.2 million in fee revenue related to a payment received due to the early termination of
a customer contract.
Commission expense includes payments made to financial institution customers based on official
check average investable balances and short-term interest rate indices, as well as costs associated
with swaps and the sale of receivables program. Commission expense increased five percent and four
percent for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively, as compared to 2005,
primarily due to higher short-term interest rates that resulted in higher commissions paid to
financial institution customers, partially offset by a decline in swap costs and lower investable
balances.
Operating margin for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 was 9.1 percent and 13.4
percent, respectively (13.7 percent and 17.7 percent, respectively, on a taxable equivalent basis)
as compared to 9.8 percent and 13.5 percent, respectively (15.1 percent and 18.4 percent,
respectively, on a taxable equivalent basis) for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2005. The operating margin for the third quarter of 2005 benefited by 2.3 percentage points from
pretax cash flows from previously impaired securities and income from limited partnership
interests. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, the operating margin benefited by
10.0 percentage points and 4.3 percentage points, respectively, from pretax cash flows from
previously impaired securities, income from limited partnership interests and a customer early
termination fee in 2005.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
One of our primary financial goals is to maintain an adequate level of liquidity to manage the
fluctuations in the balances of payment service assets and obligations resulting from varying
levels of sales of official checks, money orders and other payment instruments, the timing of the
collections of receivables and the timing of the presentment of such instruments for payment. In
addition, we strive to maintain adequate levels of liquidity for capital expenditures and other
normal operating cash needs.
At September 30, 2006, we had cash and cash equivalents of $886.4 million, net receivables of $1.6
billion and investments of $5.8 billion, all substantially restricted for payment service
obligations. We rely on the funds from ongoing sales of payment instruments and portfolio cash
flows to settle payment service obligations as they are presented. Due to the continuous nature of
the sales and settlement of our payment instruments, we are able to invest in securities with a
longer term than the average life of our payment instruments.
We are regulated by various state agencies which generally require us to maintain liquid assets and
investments with an investment rating of A or higher in an amount generally equal to the payment
service obligation for regulated payment instruments (teller checks, agent checks, money orders and
money transfers). We are not regulated by state agencies for our payment service obligations
resulting from outstanding cashiers checks; however, we restrict the funds related to these
payment instruments due to contractual arrangements and/or Company policy. Accordingly, assets
restricted for regulatory or contractual reasons and by Company policy are not available to satisfy
operating or other financing requirements. In addition, our Company policy limits our investment in
below investment grade securities to 3.0 percent of our total investments and cash equivalents. As
of September 30, 2006, we were in compliance with this policy.
As of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, we had unrestricted cash and cash equivalents,
receivables and investments to the extent those assets exceed all payment service obligations as
summarized in Table 9. These amounts are generally available; however, management considers a
portion of these amounts as providing additional assurance that regulatory requirements are
maintained during the normal fluctuations in the value of investments.
29
Table 9 Unrestricted Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
886,395 |
|
|
$ |
866,391 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
1,602,153 |
|
|
|
1,325,622 |
|
Investments |
|
|
5,761,583 |
|
|
|
6,233,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,250,131 |
|
|
|
8,425,346 |
|
Amounts restricted to cover payment service obligations |
|
|
(7,878,315 |
) |
|
|
(8,059,309 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted assets |
|
$ |
371,816 |
|
|
$ |
366,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in unrestricted assets is primarily due to changes in our working capital
resulting from the timing of normal operational activities, offset by fluctuations in the market
value of our investments, capital expenditures, repurchases of our common stock, payment of
dividends and the acquisition of Money Express.
30
Table 10 Cash Flows Provided By or Used In Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Net income |
|
$ |
30,038 |
|
|
$ |
29,538 |
|
|
$ |
97,679 |
|
|
$ |
83,391 |
|
Total adjustments to reconcile net income |
|
|
14,225 |
|
|
|
27,163 |
|
|
|
31,473 |
|
|
|
42,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities before changes in payment service assets and obligations |
|
|
44,263 |
|
|
|
56,701 |
|
|
|
129,152 |
|
|
|
125,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents (substantially restricted) |
|
|
(154,183 |
) |
|
|
332,403 |
|
|
|
(10,473 |
) |
|
|
(72,011 |
) |
Change in receivables, net (substantially restricted) |
|
|
(39,948 |
) |
|
|
(88,236 |
) |
|
|
(278,935 |
) |
|
|
(636,491 |
) |
Change in payment service obligations |
|
|
(264,147 |
) |
|
|
(200,730 |
) |
|
|
(192,985 |
) |
|
|
579,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in payment service assets and obligations |
|
|
(458,278 |
) |
|
|
43,437 |
|
|
|
(482,393 |
) |
|
|
(128,579 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
(414,015 |
) |
|
$ |
100,138 |
|
|
$ |
(353,241 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,963 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
activities used net cash of $414.0 million during the third quarter of 2006 and
provided net cash of $100.1 million during the third quarter of 2005, for an increase in net cash
used of $514.2 million. Operating activities used net cash of $353.2 million during the nine
months ended September 30, 2006 and $3.0 million during the same period in 2005, for an increase in
net cash used of $350.3 million. These increases are primarily due to an increase in cash used by
the net change in payment service assets and obligations resulting from the timing of remittances
and changes in transaction volumes.
The balances of our payment service assets and obligations are primarily affected by the timing of
transactions and remittances by our agents and financial institution customers of the cash proceeds
from those transactions, the length of time between sale and presentation of a payment service
instrument and the volume of transactions. Our official check product comprises a substantial
portion of our receivables and payment service obligations as this product has higher face amounts.
Balances for receivables and payment service obligations will not move in tandem as the remittance
of monies from our agents and financial institution customers to the Company will not match the
timing of when a payment service instrument is presented for payment or a money transfer is
collected. Financial institution customers remit to the Company one day after the sale of the
instrument; all other remittances are made on contractual timeframes of typically one to three
days. On average, our money order product is presented for payment eight to ten days after sale;
our official check product is presented for payment three to five days after sale; and money
transfers are typically collected within one day.
Table 11 Cash Flows Provided By or Used In Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments |
|
$ |
618,268 |
|
|
$ |
275,893 |
|
|
$ |
1,118,060 |
|
|
$ |
1,513,271 |
|
Purchases of investments |
|
|
(176,118 |
) |
|
|
(357,902 |
) |
|
|
(668,859 |
) |
|
|
(1,438,718 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment activity |
|
|
442,150 |
|
|
|
(82,009 |
) |
|
|
449,201 |
|
|
|
74,553 |
|
Cash received (paid) for acquisitions |
|
|
5,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,311 |
) |
|
|
(8,535 |
) |
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(17,102 |
) |
|
|
(6,877 |
) |
|
|
(57,299 |
) |
|
|
(32,228 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
430,789 |
|
|
|
(88,886 |
) |
|
|
384,591 |
|
|
|
33,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
Investing
activities provided cash of $430.8 million and $384.6 million during the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively, and used cash of $88.9 million during the three
months ended September 30, 2005 and provided cash of $33.8 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2005. Investing activities primarily consist of activity within our investment
portfolio. The increase in cash provided by net investment activity in the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2006 as compared to 2005 is due to primarily to the lower purchases of
investments.
In addition, the Company sold securities with a fair value of $259.7 million to one party (the
acquiring party) during the third quarter of 2006. No restrictions or constraints as to the
future use of the securities were placed upon the acquiring party by the Company, nor was the
Company obligated under any scenario to repurchase securities from the acquiring party. In August
2006, the acquiring party sold securities totaling $646.8 million to a QSPE, including
substantially all of the securities originally purchased from the Company. The Company acquired
the preferred shares of the QSPE and accounts for this investment at fair value as an
available-for-sale investment in accordance with SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments
in Debt and Equity Securities. At September 30, 2006, the fair value of the preferred shares was
$7.8 million. In addition, a subsidiary of the Company will serve as the collateral advisor to the
QSPE, receiving certain fees and rights standard to a collateral advisor role. Activities
performed by the collateral advisor are significantly limited and are entirely defined by the legal
documents establishing the QSPE. For performing these activities, the collateral advisor receives
a quarterly fee equal to ten basis points on the fair value of the collateral. The collateral
advisor also received and recognized a one-time fee of $0.4 million in August 2006 for the
placement of the preferred shares of the QSPE.
In the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the Company acquired Money Express, its former super
agent in Italy. During the third quarter of 2006, the Company received a payment from the previous
owner of MoneyExpress for a purchase adjustment related to net assets. In the nine months ended
September 30, 2005, the Company acquired ACH Commerce. Capital expenditures in all periods
presented relate to our continued investment in the money transfer platform. In addition, we
acquired a 50% interest in a corporate aircraft during 2005 and the remaining 50% interest in 2006
from our former parent company.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: Financing
activities used cash of $16.8 million and $11.3
million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, financing activities used cash of $31.4 million and $30.8
million, respectively. Sources of cash relate primarily to the exercise of stock options, which
provided $3.0 million and $3.3 million during the third quarter of 2006 and 2005, respectively, and
$20.2 million and $6.0 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. The exercise of stock options also generated $1.2 million and $0.4 million of tax
benefits in the third quarter of 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $4.9 million and $0.7 million in
the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Cash used by financing activities relates primarily to our purchase of $17.5 million and $14.1
million of treasury stock during the third quarter of 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $46.2
million and $34.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
In addition, we paid $3.4 million and $0.9 million in dividends during the third quarter of 2006
and 2005, respectively, and $10.2 million and $2.6 million during the nine months ended September
30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Other Funding Sources and Requirements
We have a bank credit facility providing $350.0 million in the form of a $100.0 million term loan
and a $250.0 million revolving credit facility. At September 30, 2006, we had outstanding
borrowings under the credit facility consisting of a $100.0 million term loan and $50.0 million
under the revolving credit facility. The maturity date of the term loan and the credit facility is
June 2010. The credit facility may be increased to $500.0 million under certain circumstances. The
interest rate applicable to both the term loan and the credit facility is LIBOR plus 50 basis
points, subject to adjustment in the event of a change in the credit ratings of our senior
unsecured debt. The usage fees on the facility range from 0.080 percent to 0.250 percent, depending
on the credit rating of our senior unsecured debt. At September 30, 2006, the interest rate under
the bank credit facility was 5.9 percent, exclusive of the effect of commitment fees and other
costs, and the facility fee was 0.125 percent. The remaining availability under the bank credit
facility may be used for general corporate purposes and to support letters of credit. Loans under
the bank credit facility are guaranteed on an unsecured basis by our material domestic
subsidiaries. Borrowings under the bank credit facilities are subject to various covenants,
including interest coverage ratio, leverage ratio and consolidated total indebtedness ratio. The
interest coverage ratio of earnings before interest and taxes to interest expense must not be less
than 3.5 to 1.0. The leverage ratio of total debt to total capitalization must be less than 0.5 to
1.0. The consolidated total indebtedness ratio of total debt to earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization must be less than 3.0 to 1.0. At September 30, 2006, we were in
compliance with all of the covenants under the bank credit facility.
32
At September 30, 2006, we had available reverse repurchase agreements, letters of credit and
overdraft facilities totaling $2.3 billion, including a $1.0 billion reverse repurchase agreement
with one clearing bank. At September 30, 2006, $11.1 million was outstanding under letters of
credit.
As of September 30, 2006, the total amount of unfunded commitments related to investments in
limited partnerships was $5.2 million.
Table 12 Contractual Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than |
|
|
Total |
|
1 year |
|
1-3 years |
|
3-5 years |
|
5 years |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Debt, including interest payments |
|
$ |
183,019 |
|
|
$ |
8,805 |
|
|
$ |
17,610 |
|
|
$ |
156,604 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Operating leases |
|
|
60,039 |
|
|
|
7,854 |
|
|
|
16,062 |
|
|
|
14,714 |
|
|
|
21,409 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
23,644 |
|
|
|
14,997 |
|
|
|
8,050 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other obligations |
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations |
|
$ |
272,065 |
|
|
$ |
37,019 |
|
|
$ |
41,722 |
|
|
$ |
171,915 |
|
|
$ |
21,409 |
|
|
|
|
Debt consists of principal amounts outstanding under the variable rate term loan and revolving
credit facility at September 30, 2006, as well as related interest payments. As discussed above,
interest payments on our outstanding debt are based on a floating interest rate indexed to LIBOR.
For disclosure purposes, the interest rate for future periods has been assumed to be 5.9 percent,
which is the rate in effect on September 30, 2006. Operating and capital leases consist of various
leases relating to buildings and equipment. Derivative financial instruments represent the net
payable under our interest rate swap agreements. Other obligations are unfunded capital commitments
related to limited partnership interests included in our investment portfolio.
MoneyGram has a frozen funded, noncontributory pension plan that it assumed from Viad in connection
with the spin-off. Funding policies provide that payments to defined benefit pension trusts shall
be equal to the minimum funding required by applicable regulations. During the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2006, MoneyGram contributed $13.1 million and $18.3 million,
respectively, to the funded pension plan. We expect to contribute an additional $2.3 million in the
remainder of 2006. MoneyGram also has certain unfunded pension and postretirement plans that
require benefit payments over extended periods of time. During the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006, we paid benefits totaling $0.9 million and $2.7 million, respectively, related
to these unfunded plans. Benefit payments under these unfunded plans are expected to be $1.1
million in the remainder of 2006. Expected contributions and benefit payments under these plans are
not included in the table above. In August 2006, Congress approved the Pension Protection Act of
2006, which requires new funding rules for defined benefit plans. We are currently reviewing the
impact of this new law.
Although no assurance can be given, we expect operating cash flows and short-term borrowings to be
sufficient to finance our ongoing business, maintain adequate capital levels, and meet debt and
clearing agreement covenants and investment grade rating requirements. Should financing
requirements exceed such sources of funds, we believe we have adequate external financing sources
available, including unused commitments under our credit facilities, to cover any shortfall.
The Company has an effective universal shelf registration on file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. The universal shelf registration provides for the issuance of up to $500.0 million of
our securities, including common stock, preferred stock and debt securities. The securities may be
sold from time to time in one or more series. The terms of the securities and any offering of the
securities will be determined at the time of the sale. The shelf registration is intended to
provide the Company with additional funding sources for general corporate purposes, including
working capital, capital expenditures, debt payment, the financing of possible acquisitions or
stock repurchases.
33
Stockholders Equity
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, MoneyGram purchased 580,000 and 1,534,050
shares of our common stock, respectively, at an average price of $30.18 and $30.14 per share,
respectively. As of September 30, 2006, the Company has remaining authorization to purchase up to
2,420,000 shares of its common stock.
In August 2006, the Companys Board of Directors approved a small stockholder selling/repurchasing
program. This program enables MoneyGram stockholders with less than 100 shares of common stock as
of August 21, 2006, to voluntarily purchase additional stock to reach 100 shares or sell all of
their shares back to the Company.
The Companys Board of Directors declared cash dividends of $0.04 per share of common stock in each
of the three quarters of 2006. Any future determination to pay dividends on MoneyGram common stock
will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on our financial condition,
results of operations, cash requirements, prospects and such other factors as our Board of
Directors may deem relevant. Subject to Board approval, the Company intends to continue paying a
quarterly dividend, which will be funded through cash generated from operating activities.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have an agreement to sell, on a periodic basis, undivided percentage ownership interests in
certain receivables, primarily from our money order agents, in an amount not to exceed $400.0
million. These receivables are sold to commercial paper conduits (trusts) sponsored by a financial
institution and represent a small percentage of the total assets in these conduits. Our rights and
obligations are limited to the receivables transferred, and are accounted for as sales transactions
under Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. The assets and liabilities
associated with these conduits, including our sold receivables, are not recorded or included in our
financial statements. The agreement expires in December 2006. While we are currently in discussions
and expect to extend this agreement, we do not believe the termination of this agreement would have
a material impact to our consolidated financial statements. The business purpose of this
arrangement is to accelerate cash flow for investment purposes. The receivables are sold at a
discount based upon short-term interest rates. On average, we sold receivables totaling $390.0
million and $385.9 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively,
for a total discount of $5.4 million and $15.2 million, respectively.
The Finance and Investment Committee of the Board of Directors generally approves any transactions
and strategies, including any potential off-balance sheet arrangements, which materially affect
investment results and cash flows.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America requires estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and
liabilities in the consolidated financial statements. Critical accounting policies are those
policies that management believes are most important to the portrayal of a companys financial
position and results of operations, and that require management to make estimates that are
difficult, subjective or complex. There were no changes to our critical accounting policies during
the third quarter of 2006. For further information regarding our critical accounting policies,
refer to Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Critical Accounting Policies in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005.
34
Recent Accounting Developments
In May 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting
Changes and Error Corrections, which replaces Accounting Principles Board (APB) No. 20,
Accounting Changes, and SFAS No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements.
This statement requires that an entity apply the retrospective method in reporting a change in an
accounting principle or the reporting entity. The standard only allows for a change in accounting
principle if it is required by a newly issued accounting pronouncement or the entity can justify
the use of an allowable alternative accounting principle on the basis that it is preferable. This
statement also requires that corrections for errors discovered in prior period financial statements
be reported as a prior period adjustment by restating the prior period financial statements.
Additional disclosures are required when a change in accounting principle or reporting entity
occurs, as well as when a correction for an error is reported. The statement is effective for the
Company for fiscal 2006. The adoption of this SFAS did not have a material impact to the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
In January 2006, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 45-3, Application of FASB
Interpretation No. (FIN) 45 to Minimum Revenue Guarantees Granted to a Business or Its Owners.
This FSP amends FIN 45 to include guarantees granted to a business that its revenue for a specified
period of time will be at least a specified amount. FIN 45 requires that a company record an
obligation at the inception of a guarantee equal to the fair value of the guarantee, as well as
disclose certain information relating to the guarantee. The FSP is applicable for minimum revenue
guarantees issued or modified by the Company on or after January 1, 2006, with no revision or
restatement to the accounting treatment of such guarantees issued prior to the adoption date
allowed. The disclosure requirements of FIN 45 are applicable to all outstanding minimum revenue
guarantees. The Company has adopted this FSP effective January 1, 2006 with no material impact to
the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In February 2006, the FASB issued FSP No. 123R-4, Classification of Options and Similar Instruments
Issued as Employee Compensation That Allow for Cash Settlement upon the Occurrence of a Contingent
Event. This FSP amends SFAS No. 123R, Share Based Payment, to require that stock options issued to
employees as compensation be accounted for as equity instruments until a contingent event allowing
for cash settlement is probable of occurring. The Company has adopted this FSP effective January 1,
2006 with no material impact to the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FIN 48 is an
interpretation of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition
threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a
tax position taken or expected to be taken in an entitys tax return. This interpretation also
provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure, and transition of tax positions. This FIN is effective January 1, 2007 for
MoneyGram. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, of this pronouncement on its
consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This statement does not
require any new fair value measurements, but it provides guidance on how to measure fair value
under other accounting pronouncements. SFAS 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy to
classify the source of information used in fair value measurements. The hierarchy prioritizes the
inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad categories. This
standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the
impact of this pronouncement on its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension
and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132. This
standard requires the recognition of the funded status of a pension or postretirement plan in the
balance sheet as an asset or liability. Unrecognized prior service costs and gains and losses are
recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income. SFAS 158 does not change previous guidance for
income statement recognition. The standard requires the plan assets and benefit obligations to be
measured as of the annual balance sheet date of the Company. Prospective application of this
standard is required. The recognition and disclosure provisions of SFAS 158 are effective for the
Companys 2006 year-end, while the change in measurement date is effective for the Companys 2008
year-end. The Company does not believe the adoption of this standard will have a material impact
to the Companys consolidated financial statements.
35
In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 108, which expresses the SEC
Staffs views regarding the process of quantifying financial statement misstatements. The SAB
provides for a one-time cumulative effect transition adjustment to correct for misstatements that
are now considered material as a result of implementing SAB 108. This SAB is effective for the
Companys 2006 year-end. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, of SAB 108 on its
consolidated financial statements.
Forward Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may contain forward-looking statements with respect to the
financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business of
MoneyGram International, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Statements preceded by, followed by or that
include words such as may, will, expect, anticipate, continue, estimate, project,
believes or similar expressions are intended to identify some of the forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and are included, along
with this statement, for purposes of complying with the safe harbor provisions of that Act. These
forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially
from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements due to, among others, the risks and
uncertainties described in Part II, Item 7A under the caption Risk Factors of this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q as well as the various factors described below. Since it is not possible to
foresee all such factors, you should not consider these factors to be a complete list of all risks
or uncertainties.
|
|
Agent Retention. We may be unable to renew retail agent and financial
institution customer contracts, or we may experience a loss of
business from significant agents or customers. |
|
|
|
Development of New and Enhanced Products. We may be unable to
successfully and timely implement new or enhanced technology, delivery
methods and product offerings, including pre-paid stored value cards
and new bill payment services. |
|
|
|
Intellectual Property. The loss of intellectual property protection,
the inability to secure or enforce intellectual property protection or
to successfully defend against an intellectual property infringement
action could harm our business and prospects. |
|
|
|
Litigation or Investigations. Our business and results of operations
may be materially adversely affected by lawsuits or investigations
which could result in material settlements, fines or penalties. |
|
|
|
Competition. We may be unable to compete against our large
competitors, niche competitors or new competitors that may enter the
markets in which we operate. |
|
|
|
U.S. Regulation. Failure by us or our agents to comply with the laws
and regulatory requirements of federal and state regulatory
authorities, or changes in laws, regulations or other industry
practices and standards could have an adverse effect on our results of
operations. |
|
|
|
Banking Relationships. Inability by us or our agents to maintain
existing or establish new banking relationships could adversely affect
our business, results of operations and our financial condition. |
|
|
|
International Events and Regulation. Our business and results of
operations may be adversely affected by political, economic or other
instability in countries in which we have material agent
relationships. Imposition of additional regulatory requirements in
the foreign countries in which we operate could adversely affect our
business. |
|
|
|
New Retail Locations and Acquisitions. Opening new Company owned
retail locations and/or acquiring businesses may cause a diversion of
capital and managements attention from our core business. |
|
|
|
Internal Controls. Our inability to maintain compliance with the
internal control provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 could have a material adverse effect on our business and stock
price. |
|
|
|
Agent Credit and Fraud Risks. We may face credit and fraud exposure if
we are unable to collect funds from our agents who receive the
proceeds from the sale of our payment instruments. |
|
|
|
Investment Portfolio Credit Risk. If an issuer of securities in our
investment portfolio defaulted on its payment obligations, the value
of our securities would decline, adversely affecting the value of our
investment portfolio.
|
36
|
|
Interest Rate Fluctuations. Fluctuations in interest rates may
materially adversely affect revenue derived from investment of funds
received from the sale of our payment instruments and commissions paid
to financial institution customers. |
|
|
|
Market Value of Securities. Material changes in the market value of
securities we hold may materially adversely affect our results of
operation and financial condition. |
|
|
|
International Migration Patterns. Changes in immigration laws or
other circumstances that discourage international migration could
adversely affect our money transfer remittance volume or growth rate. |
|
|
|
Liquidity. Material changes in our need for and the availability of
liquid assets may affect our ability to meet our payment service
obligations and may materially adversely affect our results of
operation and financial condition. |
|
|
|
Network and Data Security. If we face system interruptions and system
failures due to defects in our software, development delays and
installation difficulties, or for any other reason, our business could
be harmed. |
|
|
|
Business Interruption. In the event of a breakdown, catastrophic
event, security breach, improper operation or any other event
impacting our systems or processes or our vendors systems or
processes, or improper action by our employees, agents, customer
financial institutions or third party vendors, we could suffer
financial loss, loss of customers, regulatory sanctions and damage to
our reputation. |
|
|
|
Anti-Takeover Provisions. Provisions in our charter documents and
specific provisions of Delaware law may have the effect of delaying,
deterring or preventing a merger or change in control of our Company. |
|
|
|
Other Factors. Additional risk factors may be described in our other
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time. |
Actual results may differ materially from historical and anticipated results. These forward-looking
statements speak only as of the date on which such statements are made, and we undertake no
obligation to update such statements to reflect events or circumstances arising after such date.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The
Company believes that there have been no material changes in our
market risk since December 31, 2005. For further information on
market risk, refer to Part II, Item 7,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Enterprise Risk
Management in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
37
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this report (the Evaluation Date), the Company carried out
an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief
Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation
of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
No change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f)
of the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006, has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial
reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are party to a variety of legal proceedings that arise in the normal course of our business. In
these actions, plaintiffs may request punitive or other damages that may not be covered by
insurance. We accrue for these items as losses become probable and can be reasonably estimated.
While the results of these legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, management
believes that the final outcome of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated results of operations or financial position.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The risk factors set forth in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2005 have been revised and updated and are set forth in their entirety below.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Our business faces many risks. Any of the risks discussed below, or elsewhere in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q or our other SEC filings, could have a material impact on our business,
financial condition or results of operations.
RISK FACTORS
If we lose key retail agents or are unable to maintain our Global Funds Transfer agent network, our
business and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We may not be able to retain all of our current retail agents. The competition for retail agents is
intense, and larger agents are increasingly demanding financial concessions and more information
technology customization. The development and equipment necessary to meet agent demands could
require substantial capital expenditures. If we were unable to meet these demands, we could lose
agents and our volume of money transfers would be substantially reduced. If agents decide to leave
our network, or if we are unable to sign new agents, our revenue would decline.
38
Existing agents may generate fewer transactions or less revenue for various reasons, including
increased competition. An agent may encounter business difficulties unrelated to its provision of
our services, which could cause the agent to reduce its number of locations or hours of operation,
or cease doing business altogether.
A substantial portion of our transaction volume is generated by a limited number of key agents.
During 2005 and 2004, our ten largest agents accounted for 31 percent and 27 percent, respectively,
of our total revenue and 46 percent and 41 percent, respectively, of the revenue of our Global
Funds Transfer segment. Our largest agent, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., accounted for 13 percent and 9
percent of our total revenue and 19 percent and 14 percent of the revenue of our Global Funds
Transfer segment in 2005 and 2004, respectively. If any of these key agents were not to renew their
contracts with us, or if such agents were to reduce the number of their locations, or cease doing
business, we might not be able to replace the volume of business conducted through these agents,
and our business and results of operations would be adversely affected.
In addition, many of our high volume agents are in the check cashing industry. There are risks
associated with the check cashing industry that could cause this portion of our agent base to
decline. Any regulatory action that adversely affects check cashers could also cause this portion
of our agent base to decline.
If we lose large financial institution customers in our Payment Systems segment, our business and
results of operation could be adversely affected.
During 2005 and 2004, our ten largest financial institution customers accounted for 13 percent and
14 percent, respectively, of our total revenue and 39 percent and 39 percent, respectively, of the
revenue of our Payment Systems segment. Our largest financial institution customer generated 4
percent of our total revenue in 2005 and 2004 and 11 percent and 10 percent of the revenue in our
Payment Systems segment in 2005 and 2004, respectively. The loss of any of our top financial
institution customers could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
If we fail to successfully develop and timely introduce new and enhanced products and services, our
business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Our future growth will depend, in part, on our ability to continue to develop and successfully
introduce new and enhanced methods of providing money transfer, money order, official check, bill
payment and related services that keep pace with competitive introductions, technological changes
and the demands and preferences of our agents, financial institution customers and consumers. Many
of our competitors offer stored-value cards and other electronic payment mechanisms, including
various internet-based payment services, which we have only recently introduced, that could be
substituted for traditional forms of payment, such as the money orders, bill payment and money
transfer services that we offer. If these alternative payment mechanisms become widely substituted
for our products and services, and we do not develop and ramp up similar alternative payment
mechanisms successfully and on a timely basis, our business and prospects could be adversely
affected.
If we are unable to protect the intellectual property rights related to our existing and any new or
enhanced products and services, our business, prospects, financial condition and results of
operations could be adversely affected.
We rely on a combination of patent, trademark and copyright laws, trade secret protection and
confidentiality and license agreements to protect the intellectual property rights related to our
products and services. We also investigate the intellectual property rights of third parties to
prevent our infringement of those rights. We may be subject to claims of third parties that we
infringe or have misappropriated their proprietary rights. We may be required to spend resources to
defend any such claims and/or to protect and police our own rights. Some intellectual property
rights may not be protected by intellectual property laws, particularly in foreign jurisdictions.
The loss of intellectual property protection, the inability to secure or enforce intellectual
property protection or to successfully defend against an intellectual property infringement action
could harm our business and prospects.
Litigation or investigations involving our agents or MoneyGram which could result in material
settlements, fines or penalties may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
Our business has in the past been, and may in the future continue to be, the subject of class
actions, regulatory actions, investigations or other litigation. The outcome of class action
lawsuits, regulatory actions or investigations is difficult to assess or quantify. Plaintiffs in
these types of lawsuits may seek recovery of very large or indeterminate amounts, and the magnitude
of lawsuits and actions may remain unknown for substantial periods of time. The cost to defend
future lawsuits or investigations may be significant.
39
There may also be adverse publicity associated with lawsuits and investigations that could decrease
customer acceptance of our agents and our services. As a result, litigation or investigations
involving our agents or MoneyGram may adversely affect our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
We face intense competition, and if we are unable to continue to compete effectively, our business,
financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.
The industries in which we compete are highly competitive, and we face a variety of competitors
across our businesses. In addition, new competitors or alliances among established companies may
emerge. Our primary competition comes from Western Union, which has substantially greater
transaction volume than we do. Western Union has a larger agent base, a more established brand name
and substantially greater financial and marketing resources than we do. We cannot anticipate what,
if any, effect Western Union will have on our business or the money transfer industry.
The Global Funds Transfer segment of our business competes in a concentrated industry, with a small
number of large competitors and a large number small, niche competitors. Our large competitors are
other providers of money orders and money transfer services, including Western Union and the U.S.
Postal Service with respect to money orders. We also compete with banks and niche person-to-person
money transfer service providers that serve select send and receive corridors.
The Payment Systems segment of our business competes in a concentrated industry with a small number
of large competitors. Our competitors in this segment are Integrated Payment Systems, a subsidiary
of First Data Corporation, and Federal Home Loan Banks. We also compete with financial institutions
that have developed internal processing capabilities or services similar to ours and do not
outsource these services.
Recent levels of growth in consumer money transfer transactions and other payment products may not
continue. In addition, consolidation among payment services companies has occurred and could
continue. If we are unable to compete effectively in the changing marketplace, our business,
financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.
Our agents and MoneyGram are subject to a number of risks relating to U.S. federal and state
regulatory requirements which could result in material settlements, fines or penalties or changes
in their or our business operations that may adversely affect our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Our business is subject to a wide range of laws and regulations. These include financial services
regulations, consumer disclosure and consumer protection laws, currency control regulations, money
transfer and payment instrument licensing regulations, escheat laws and laws covering consumer
privacy, data protection and information security. In addition to the foregoing, the money
transfer business is subject to a variety of state and federal regulations in the U.S. aimed at the
prevention of money laundering and terrorism. We are subject to U.S. federal anti-money laundering
laws and the requirements of the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), which prohibit us from
transmitting money to specified countries or on behalf of prohibited individuals. The USA PATRIOT
Act also mandates several anti-money laundering requirements.
Any intentional or negligent violation of the laws and regulations set forth above by our employees
or our agents could lead to significant fines and/or penalties, and could limit our ability to
conduct business in some jurisdictions. In addition to those direct costs, a failure by us or our
agents to comply with applicable laws and regulations also could seriously damage our reputation
and brands, and result in diminished revenue and profit and increased operating costs.
Changes in laws, regulations or other industry practices and standards may occur which could
increase our compliance and other costs of doing business, could require significant systems
redevelopment, reduce the market for or value of our products or services or render our products or
services less profitable or obsolete, and could have an adverse effect on our results of
operations. Changes in the laws affecting the kinds of entities that are permitted to act as money
transfer agents (such as changes in requirements for capitalization or ownership) could adversely
affect our ability to distribute our services and the cost of providing such services, both by us
and our agents. If onerous regulatory requirements were imposed on our agents, they could lead to
a loss of agents, which, in turn, could lead to a loss of retail business.
40
Failure by us or our agents to comply with the laws and regulatory requirements of federal and
state regulatory authorities could result in, among other things, revocation of required licenses
or registrations, loss of approved status, termination of contracts with banks or retail
representatives, administrative enforcement actions and fines, class action lawsuits, cease and
desist orders and civil and criminal liability. The occurrence of one or more of these events could
materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Company conducts money transfer transactions through agents in some regions that are
politically volatile and/or, in a limited number of cases, are subject to certain OFAC
restrictions.
The Company conducts money transfer transactions through agents in some regions that are
politically volatile and/or, in a limited number of cases, are subject to certain OFAC
restrictions. While the Company has instituted policies and procedures to protect against
violations of law, it is possible that the Companys money transfer service or other products could
be used by wrong-doers in a contravention of U.S. law or regulations. In addition to monetary
fines or penalties that the Company could incur, the Company is also subject to reputational harm
that could adversely impact the value of the shareholders investment.
An inability for our agents or for us to maintain adequate banking relationships may adversely
affect our financial condition.
We and our agents are considered Money Service Businesses, or MSBs, in the United States
under the Bank Secrecy Act. An increasing number of financial institutions view MSBs, as a class,
as higher risk customers for purposes of their anti-money laundering compliance programs. As a
result, several financial institutions have terminated their banking relationships with some of our
agents and one with us. If a significant number of agents are unable to maintain existing or
establish new banking relationships, they may not be able to continue to offer our services. Any
inability on our part to maintain existing or establish new banking relationships could adversely
affect our business, results of operations and our financial condition.
Imposition of additional regulatory requirements in any of the foreign countries in which we
operate could adversely affect our business.
International regulation of the money transfer business varies from country to country. Although
most countries (other than Germany, France, Malaysia, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Ukraine and the
United Kingdom) do not regulate this business to the same degree as the United States, this could
change in the future. Various foreign governments could impose penalties or charges, or additional
regulatory requirements on us or our agents, such as licensing requirements, government watch lists
that prohibit the transfer of money on behalf of prohibited individuals, and anti-money laundering
regulations. Any of these requirements, including anti-money laundering requirements and related
scrutiny, could make it more difficult to originate money transfers overseas, increase our costs or
decrease our revenues. Any inadvertent violation of a law or regulation by us or one of our agents
could subject us to damages, including fines or penalties.
The opening of new retail locations and acquisition or start-up of businesses create risks and may
affect our operating results.
We have recently opened several Company owned retail locations for the sale of our products and
services. Operating such retail locations presents new risks for us. After substantial capital
investment in such retail locations it is uncertain how such locations will be accepted in the
market and how quickly transaction volume will increase. We also may be subject to additional laws
and regulations which are triggered by our ownership of the retail locations and our employment of
the individuals staffing such retail locations.
Additionally, we may from time to time acquire or start-up businesses both inside and outside of
the U.S. The acquisition and integration of businesses involve a number of risks. We may not be
able to successfully integrate any businesses that we acquire, including their facilities,
personnel, financial systems, distribution, operations and general operating procedures. If we
fail to successfully integrate acquisitions, we could experience increased costs and other
operating inefficiencies, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
The diversion of capital and managements attention from our core business that results from
opening retail locations and/or acquiring or starting-up new businesses could adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Failure to maintain effective internal controls in accordance with Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act could have a material adverse affect on our business and stock price.
41
Due to our July 1, 2004 spin-off and new status as a public company, 2006 is the first year in
which we are required to certify and report on our compliance with the requirements of Section 404
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting and a report by our independent registered public
accounting firm addressing these assessments. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal
controls, as such standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, we may not be
able to ensure that we can conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal controls
over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404. In order to achieve effective internal
controls we may need to enhance our accounting systems or processes which could increase our cost
of doing business. Any failure to achieve and maintain an effective internal control environment
could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We face credit and fraud risks from our retail agents.
The vast majority of our Global Funds Transfer business is conducted through independent agents
that provide our products and services to consumers at their business locations. Our agents receive
the proceeds from the sale of our payment instruments and we must then collect these funds from the
agents. As a result, we have credit exposure to our agents, which averages approximately $1.1
billion in the aggregate, representing a combination of money orders, money transfers and bill
payment proceeds. During 2005, this credit exposure was spread across almost 27,500 agents, of
which 14 owed us in excess of $15.0 million each at any one time.
We are not insured against credit losses, except in circumstances of agent theft or fraud. If an
agent becomes insolvent, files for bankruptcy, commits fraud or otherwise fails to remit money
order or money transfer proceeds to us, we must nonetheless pay the money order or complete the
money transfer on behalf of the consumer. Moreover, we have made, and may in the future make,
secured or unsecured loans to retail agents under limited circumstances or allow agents to retain
our funds for a period of time before remitting them to us. The failure of agents owing us large
amounts to remit funds to us or to repay such amounts could materially adversely affect our
business, results of operations and our financial condition.
We are subject to credit risk related to our investment portfolio and our use of derivatives.
Our credit risk includes the potential risk that the Company may not collect on interest and/or
principal associated with its investments, as well as counterparty risk associated with its
derivative financial instruments. Approximately 83 percent of our investment portfolio at December
31, 2005 consisted of securities that are not issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government. If the
issuer of any of these securities were to default in its payment obligations to us or to otherwise
experience credit problems, the value of the investments would decline and adversely impact our
investment portfolio and our earnings. At December 31, 2005, we were party to derivative
instruments, known as swaps, having a notional amount of $2.7 billion. These swap agreements are
contracts in which we and a counterparty agree to exchange periodic payments based on a fixed or
variable rate of interest on a given notional amount, without the exchange of the underlying
notional amounts. The notional amount of a swap agreement is used to measure amounts to be paid or
received and does not represent the amount of exposure to credit loss. At any point in time,
depending upon many factors including the interest rate environment and the fixed and variable
rates of the swap agreements, we may owe our counterparty or our counterparty may owe us. If any of
our counterparties to these swap agreements were to default in its payment obligation to us or
otherwise experience credit problems, we could be adversely affected.
Our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected by fluctuations in
interest rates.
We derive a substantial portion of our revenue from the investment of funds we receive from the
sale of payment instruments, such as official checks and money orders, until these instruments are
settled. We generally invest these funds in long-term fixed-income securities. We pay the financial
institutions to which we provide official check outsourcing services a commission based on the
average balance of funds produced by their sale of official checks. This commission is generally
calculated on the basis of a variable rate based on short-term financial indices, such as the
federal funds rate. In addition, we have agreements to sell, on a periodic basis, undivided
percentage interests in some of our receivables from agents at a price that is discounted based on
short-term interest rates. To mitigate the effects of interest rate fluctuations on our commission
expense and the net proceeds from our sales of agent receivables, we enter into variable-to-fixed
rate swap agreements. These swap agreements require us to pay our counterparty a fixed interest
rate on an agreed notional amount, while our counterparty pays us a variable interest rate on that
same notional amount.
Fluctuations in interest rates affect the value and amount of revenue produced by our investment
portfolio, the amount of commissions that we pay, the net proceeds from our sale of receivables and
the amount that we pay or receive under our swap agreements. As a result, our net investment
revenue, which is the difference, or spread, between the amount we earn on our investment
portfolio and the commissions we pay and the discount on the sale of receivables, net of the effect
of the swap agreements, is subject to interest rate risk as the components of net investment
revenue are not perfectly matched through time and across all possible interest rate scenarios.
42
Certain investments in our portfolio, primarily fixed-rate mortgage-backed investments, are subject
to prepayment with no penalty to the borrower. As interest rates decrease, borrowers are more
likely to prepay fixed-rate debt, resulting in cash flows that are received earlier than expected.
Replacing the higher-rate investments that prepay with lower rate investments could reduce our net
investment revenue. Conversely, an increase in interest rates may result in slower than expected
prepayments and, therefore, cash flows that are received later than expected. In this case, there
is risk that the cost of our commission payments may reprice faster than our investments and at a
higher cost, which could reduce our net investment revenue.
Material changes in the market value of securities we hold, or in the securities as to which we act
as an advisor, may materially affect our results of operation and financial condition.
We also bear market risk that arises from fluctuations in interest rates that may result in changes
in the values of our investments and swap agreements. Rate movements can affect the repricing of
assets and liabilities differently, as well as their market value. Stockholders equity can be
adversely affected by changing interest rates, as after-tax changes in the fair value of securities
classified as available-for-sale and after-tax changes in the fair value of our swaps are reflected
as increases and decreases to a component of stockholders equity. The fair value of our swaps
generally increases when the market value of fixed rate, long-term debt investments decline and
vice versa. However, the changes in the fair value of swaps and investments may not fully offset,
which could adversely affect stockholders equity.
The market values of securities we hold may decline due to a variety of factors, including decline
in credit rating of the issuer or credit issues related to underlying collateral of the security,
general market conditions and increases in interest rates for comparable obligations. If we
determine that an unrealized loss on a security is other-than-temporary, the loss becomes a
realized loss through an impairment charge in the income statement.
Our wholly owned subsidiary has entered into an agreement to act as collateral advisor for a pool
of investment securities owned by a third party. Deterioration in the value or performance of this
investment pool, while not directly related to the companys own performance, could adversely
affect the business and prospects of the collateral advisor.
A material slow down or complete disruption in international migration patterns could adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The money transfer business relies in part on migration patterns, as individuals move from their
native country into countries with greater economic opportunities and/or a more stable political
environment. A significant portion of money transfer transactions are initiated by immigrants or
refugees sending money back to their native countries. Changes in immigration laws, economic
development patterns that discourage international migration and political or other events (such as
war, terrorism or health emergencies) that would make it more difficult for individuals to migrate
or work abroad could adversely affect our money transfer remittance volume or growth rate and could
each have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business may require cash in amounts greater than the amount of available credit facilities and
liquid assets that we have on hand at a particular time, and if we were forced to ultimately
liquidate assets or secure other financing as a result of unexpected liquidity needs, our earnings
could be reduced.
We are subject to risks relating to daily liquidity needs, as well as extraordinary events, such as
the unexpected loss of a customer. On a daily basis, we receive remittances from our agents and
financial institution customers and we must clear and pay the financial instruments that were
previously sold and currently are presented for payment. We monitor and maintain a liquidity
portfolio along with credit lines and repurchase agreements in order to cover payment service
obligations as they are presented. If we were forced to liquidate portfolio assets or secure other
financing as a result of unexpected liquidity needs, our earnings could be reduced. In addition, if
we were to lose any of our significant customers, in addition to losing the related revenues, we
may have to liquidate investments or seek to borrow for a period of time to fund our obligation to
clear the outstanding instruments issued on behalf of that customer at the termination of its
contract. We may not be able to plan effectively for every customer contract termination, which
could result in sale of investments at a loss of or lower profits than we would otherwise realize
due to prevailing market conditions.
Our business is highly dependent on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of our computer
network systems and data centers, and any disruption or material breach of security of our systems
could harm our business.
43
Our ability to provide reliable service largely depends on the efficient and uninterrupted
operation of our computer network systems and data centers. Any significant interruptions or
security or privacy breaches in our facilities, computer networks and databases could harm our
business and reputation, cause inquiries and fines or penalties from regulatory or governmental
authorities, and cause a loss of customers. Certain of our agent contracts contain service level
standards pertaining to the operation of our system, and give the agent a right of termination for
system downtime exceeding agreed upon service levels.
Our systems and operations could be exposed to damage or interruption from fire, natural disaster,
power loss, telecommunications failure, unauthorized entry or physical break-ins, computer viruses
and hackers. The measures we have enacted, such as the implementation of disaster recovery plans
and redundant computer systems, may not be successful and we may experience problems other than
system failures. We may also experience software defects, development delays and installation
difficulties, which would harm our business and reputation and expose us to potential liability and
increased operating expenses.
Third-party contractors also may experience security breaches involving the storage and
transmission of proprietary information. If users gain improper access to our systems or databases,
they may be able to steal, publish, delete or modify confidential third-party information that is
stored or transmitted on the networks. Our data applications may not be sufficient to address
technological advances, changing market conditions or other developments. If we face system
interruptions and system failures due to defects in our software, development delays, installation
difficulties or for any other reason, our business interruption insurance may not be adequate to
compensate us for all losses or damages that we may incur.
Our business involves the movement of large sums of money, and, as a result, our business is
particularly dependent on our ability to process and settle transactions accurately and
efficiently.
Our business involves the movement of large sums of money. Our revenues consist primarily of
transaction fees that we charge for the movement of this money and investment revenues. These
transaction fees represent only a small fraction of the total amount of money that we move. Because
we are responsible for large sums of money that are substantially greater than our revenues, the
success of our business particularly depends upon the efficient and error-free handling of the
money that is remitted to us and that is used to clear payment instruments or complete money
transfers. We rely on the ability of our employees and our internal systems and processes to
process these transactions in an efficient, uninterrupted and error-free manner. In addition, we
rely on third-party vendors in our business, including clearing banks which clear our money orders
and official checks and certain of our telecommunications providers. In the event of a breakdown,
catastrophic event, security breach, improper operation or any other event impacting our systems or
processes or our vendors systems or processes, or improper action by our employees, agents,
customer financial institutions or third party vendors, we could suffer financial loss, loss of
customers, regulatory sanctions and damage to our reputation.
There are a number of risks associated with our international sales and operations that could harm
our business.
We provided money transfer services between and among approximately 170 countries and territories
at December 31, 2005, and our strategy is to expand our international business. Our ability to grow
in international markets and our future results could be harmed by a number of factors, including:
|
|
changes in political and economic conditions and potential instability in certain regions; |
|
|
changes in regulatory requirements or in foreign policy and the adoption of foreign laws detrimental to our business; |
|
|
burdens of complying with a wide variety of laws and regulations; |
|
|
possible fraud or theft losses, and lack of compliance by international representatives in remote locations and foreign
legal systems where collection and enforcement may be difficult or costly; |
|
|
reduced protection for our intellectual property rights; |
|
|
unfavorable tax rules or trade barriers; |
|
|
inability to secure, train or monitor international agents; and |
|
|
failure to successfully manage our exposure to foreign currency exchange rates. |
44
Our charter documents, our rights plan and Delaware law contain provisions that could delay or
prevent an acquisition of our Company, which could inhibit your ability to receive a premium on
your investment from a possible sale of our Company.
Our charter documents contain provisions that may discourage third parties from seeking to acquire
our Company. In addition, we have adopted a rights plan which enables our Board of Directors to
issue preferred share purchase rights that would be triggered by certain prescribed events. These
provisions and specific provisions of Delaware law relating to business combinations with
interested stockholders may have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a merger or change
in control of our Company. Some of these provisions may discourage a future acquisition of our
Company even if stockholders would receive an attractive value for their shares or if a significant
number of our stockholders believed such a proposed transaction to be in their best interests. As a
result, stockholders who desire to participate in such a transaction may not have the opportunity
to do so.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
On November 18, 2004, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program for up to
2,000,000 shares of MoneyGram common stock, as announced in a press release issued on November 18,
2004. On August 18, 2005, the Board of Directors increased the share buyback authorization by
5,000,000 shares to a total of 7,000,000 shares, as announced in a press release issued on August
18, 2005. The authorization is effective until such time as the Company has repurchased 7,000,000
shares.
In August 2006, the Companys Board of Directors approved a small stockholder selling/repurchasing
program. This program enables MoneyGram stockholders with less than 100 shares of common stock as
of August 21, 2006, to voluntarily purchase additional stock to reach 100 shares or sell all of
their shares back to the Company.
The following table sets forth information in connection with purchases made by us, or on our
behalf, of shares of our common stock during the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006. The
total number of shares purchased includes shares surrendered to the Company in payment of
individual income taxes in connection with the exercise of stock options or the vesting of
restricted stock. The shares of common stock surrendered to the Company are not considered
repurchased shares under the terms of the repurchase program.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
of Shares that May |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
Yet Be Purchased |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Average Price |
|
Announced Plan |
|
Under the Plan or |
Period |
|
Shares Purchased |
|
Paid per Share |
|
or Program |
|
Program |
July 1 July 31, 2006 |
|
|
260,000 |
|
|
$ |
30.16 |
|
|
|
260,000 |
|
|
|
2,740,000 |
|
August 1 August 31, 2006 |
|
|
272,714 |
|
|
|
30.25 |
|
|
|
270,000 |
|
|
|
2,470,000 |
|
September 1 September 30, 2006 |
|
|
50,300 |
|
|
|
29.80 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
2,420,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
583,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
580,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibits are filed with this Form 10-Q as listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index.
45
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
November 9, 2006 |
MoneyGram International, Inc.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Jean C. Benson
|
|
|
|
Vice President and Controller |
|
|
|
(Chief Accounting Officer and
Authorized Officer) |
|
|
46