Bowater Incorporated
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 2005. |
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM
TO |
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 1-1872
BOWATER INCORPORATED
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
62-0721803 |
|
|
|
(State of Incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
55 East Camperdown Way, P.O. Box 1028, Greenville, SC 29602
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
(864) 271-7733
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to the filing requirements for at least the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yesþ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
November 4, 2005.
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at November 4, 2005 |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value
|
|
55,923,300 Shares |
BOWATER INCORPORATED
I N D E X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page Number |
|
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Financial Statements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30,
2005, and 2004 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Capital Accounts for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
7 15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
|
16 35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. Controls and Procedures |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART II OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Legal Proceedings |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6. Exhibits |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURES |
|
|
38 |
|
BOWATER INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited, in millions of US dollars except per-share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
872.9 |
|
|
$ |
834.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,607.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,367.3 |
|
Cost of sales,
excluding
depreciation,
amortization and
cost of timber
harvested |
|
|
630.5 |
|
|
|
586.9 |
|
|
|
1,880.6 |
|
|
|
1,731.7 |
|
Depreciation,
amortization and
cost of timber
harvested |
|
|
82.5 |
|
|
|
83.0 |
|
|
|
245.9 |
|
|
|
254.1 |
|
Distribution costs |
|
|
83.8 |
|
|
|
85.2 |
|
|
|
256.1 |
|
|
|
241.6 |
|
Selling and
administrative
expense |
|
|
41.0 |
|
|
|
39.9 |
|
|
|
121.0 |
|
|
|
108.7 |
|
Impairment of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on sale of
assets |
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
|
40.7 |
|
|
|
122.6 |
|
|
|
37.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense
(income): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
Interest
expense, net of
capitalized
interest |
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
48.4 |
|
|
|
149.5 |
|
|
|
146.5 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
48.1 |
|
|
|
46.0 |
|
|
|
142.5 |
|
|
|
136.9 |
|
|
|
|
Loss before income
taxes and minority
interests |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
(19.9 |
) |
|
|
(99.8 |
) |
Income tax expense
(benefit) |
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(44.7 |
) |
Minority interests
in net (income)
loss of
subsidiaries |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
(16.0 |
) |
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
|
|
(18.7 |
) |
|
|
(51.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive
loss, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
currency
translation
adjustments |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Minimum pension
liability
adjustments |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
Net change in
derivative
instruments |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
(47.4 |
) |
|
|
(39.2 |
) |
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(17.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(64.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(91.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per common share |
|
$ |
(0.28 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.32 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.33 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per common share |
|
$ |
(0.28 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.32 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.33 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
BOWATER INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(Unaudited, in millions of US dollars except per-share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
23.3 |
|
|
$ |
29.7 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
432.9 |
|
|
|
377.0 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
353.3 |
|
|
|
327.9 |
|
Unrealized gain on hedged transactions |
|
|
46.6 |
|
|
|
100.2 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
57.5 |
|
|
|
67.9 |
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
913.6 |
|
|
|
902.7 |
|
|
Timber and timberlands |
|
|
186.2 |
|
|
|
186.2 |
|
Fixed assets, net |
|
|
3,125.3 |
|
|
|
3,301.1 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
828.2 |
|
|
|
828.2 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
233.5 |
|
|
|
240.7 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
5,286.8 |
|
|
$ |
5,458.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current installments of long-term debt |
|
$ |
20.6 |
|
|
$ |
14.0 |
|
Short-term bank debt |
|
|
27.0 |
|
|
|
73.0 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
496.7 |
|
|
|
458.4 |
|
Dividends payable |
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
555.5 |
|
|
|
556.6 |
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current installments |
|
|
2,403.0 |
|
|
|
2,427.9 |
|
Pension, other postretirement benefits and other long-term liabilities |
|
|
494.9 |
|
|
|
495.2 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
354.8 |
|
|
|
403.4 |
|
Minority interests in subsidiaries |
|
|
68.3 |
|
|
|
68.5 |
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $1 par value. Authorized 100,000,000 shares; issued
67,529,294 and 67,438,584 shares at September 30, 2005 and December
31, 2004, respectively |
|
|
67.5 |
|
|
|
67.4 |
|
Exchangeable Shares, no par value. Unlimited shares authorized;
1,434,445 and 1,466,358 outstanding at September 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, respectively |
|
|
68.1 |
|
|
|
69.7 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,621.6 |
|
|
|
1,618.3 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
213.5 |
|
|
|
266.5 |
|
Unearned compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(74.6 |
) |
|
|
(28.6 |
) |
Treasury stock at cost, 11,605,770 and 11,608,385 shares at September
30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively |
|
|
(485.8 |
) |
|
|
(485.9 |
) |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
1,410.3 |
|
|
|
1,507.3 |
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
5,286.8 |
|
|
$ |
5,458.9 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
BOWATER INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CAPITAL ACCOUNTS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005
(Unaudited, in millions of US dollars except per-share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Paid In |
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned |
|
Other Comprehensive |
|
|
(In millions, except share amounts) |
|
Stock |
|
Exchangeable Shares |
|
Capital |
|
Retained Earnings |
|
Compensation |
|
Loss |
|
Treasury Stock |
|
Balance at December 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
67.4 |
|
|
$ |
69.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,618.3 |
|
|
$ |
266.5 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(28.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(485.9 |
) |
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retraction of Exchangeable Shares
(31,913 shares of Common Stock issued
and Exchangeable Shares retracted) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends on Common Stock ($0.60 per
share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options exercised (69,000 shares) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit on exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction of pension plan additional
minimum liability, net of tax benefit of
$0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized gain on hedged
transactions, net of change in accrued
tax of $29.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock cancellation (10,203
shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unearned compensation on
restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock used for dividend
reinvestment plans and to pay employee
and director benefits (2,615 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
67.5 |
|
|
$ |
68.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,621.6 |
|
|
$ |
213.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(74.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(485.8 |
) |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
BOWATER INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited, in millions of US dollars except per-share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(18.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(51.9 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and cost of timber harvested |
|
|
245.9 |
|
|
|
254.1 |
|
Impairment of assets |
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
(55.4 |
) |
Amortization of unearned compensation on restricted stock |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Minority interests in net loss of subsidiaries |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
Net gain on fixed assets and land sales |
|
|
(30.7 |
) |
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
Changes in working capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
(55.9 |
) |
|
|
(60.6 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(26.2 |
) |
|
|
(15.5 |
) |
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
42.4 |
|
|
|
57.1 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26.2 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(20.9 |
) |
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
143.3 |
|
|
|
85.7 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash invested in fixed assets, timber and timberlands |
|
|
(89.6 |
) |
|
|
(60.3 |
) |
Dispositions of assets, including timber and timberlands |
|
|
33.7 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(55.9 |
) |
|
|
(50.0 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends, including minority interests |
|
|
(34.3 |
) |
|
|
(34.6 |
) |
Short-term financing |
|
|
413.9 |
|
|
|
540.5 |
|
Short-term financing repayments |
|
|
(461.0 |
) |
|
|
(683.1 |
) |
Long-term financing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
245.9 |
|
Payments of long-term debt |
|
|
(14.3 |
) |
|
|
(113.8 |
) |
Stock options exercised |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for financing activities |
|
|
(93.8 |
) |
|
|
(40.0 |
) |
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year |
|
|
29.7 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
|
End of year |
|
$ |
23.3 |
|
|
$ |
15.1 |
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, including capitalized interest of $0.6 and $0 |
|
$ |
107.5 |
|
|
$ |
121.9 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
33.9 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
1. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
|
|
|
Basis of Presentation |
|
|
|
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Bowater Incorporated
and subsidiaries (Bowater). The consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2005, and the
related statements of operations, capital accounts and cash flows for the periods ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004 are unaudited. In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting of
normal recurring adjustments) necessary for fair presentation of the interim financial
statements have been made. The results of the interim period ended September 30, 2005, are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. These financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, critical
accounting policies, significant accounting policies and the notes to the consolidated financial
statements included in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain prior-year amounts
in the financial statements and the notes have been reclassified to conform to the 2005
presentation. The reclassifications had no effect on total shareholders equity or net loss. |
|
2. |
|
Stock Based Compensation |
|
|
|
Bowater accounts for stock-based compensation utilizing the intrinsic value method in accordance
with Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees. Under APB No. 25, compensation expense for employee stock options is generally not
recognized if the exercise price of the option equals or exceeds the fair value of the
underlying stock on the date of grant. |
|
|
|
The following table represents the pro forma effect on net loss and loss per share if we had
applied the fair value-based method and recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation. The estimated fair value of the option is amortized to expense over
the vesting period of the option award, in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(Unaudited, in millions, except per-share amounts) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Net loss as reported: |
|
$ |
(16.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(18.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(18.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(51.9 |
) |
Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net loss, net of related tax effects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Deduct: Stock-based compensation expense
determined under fair value based methods,
net of related tax effects |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
Pro forma net loss |
|
$ |
(17.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(19.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(23.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(56.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic, as reported |
|
$ |
(0.28 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.32 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.33 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.91 |
) |
Basic, pro forma |
|
|
(0.30 |
) |
|
|
(0.35 |
) |
|
|
(0.40 |
) |
|
|
(1.00 |
) |
Diluted, as reported |
|
$ |
(0.28 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.32 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.33 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.91 |
) |
Diluted, pro forma |
|
|
(0.30 |
) |
|
|
(0.35 |
) |
|
|
(0.40 |
) |
|
|
(1.00 |
) |
|
7
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
|
|
The fair value of each option granted in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 and
2004, was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the
weighted average assumptions below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
29.0 |
% |
|
|
30.6 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
Expected option lives in years |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
Weighted average fair value of each option |
|
$ |
11.16 |
|
|
$ |
13.88 |
|
|
|
|
In January 2005 and 2004, respectively, Bowater granted 740,750 and 862,000 options pursuant to
its 2002 stock option plan at an exercise price of $37 and $45 per share, respectively. In May
2005, Bowater granted an additional 15,000 options pursuant to its 2002 stock option plan at an
exercise price of $32 per share. The options generally become exercisable over a period of two
years and expire 10 years from date of grant. |
|
3. |
|
Asset Impairment |
|
|
|
During the second quarter of 2005, Bowater management decided to permanently shut the original
line at Benton Harbor. This was based on the significant capital spending that would be
required for the original line to meet the quality standards of our two newer Nuway lines and
because the facilitys infrastructure would not support a restart given the recent record
production of the new Benton Harbor line. This permanent shut resulted in a one time non-cash
asset impairment charge of $11.9 million. This permanent shut will not have a negative impact
on our current operations as the original line had been idled since the third quarter of 2002.
For segment reporting purposes, this impairment charge is included in our Coated and Specialty
Papers Division. |
|
4. |
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
At lower of cost or market: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
92.2 |
|
|
$ |
87.9 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
28.2 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
127.1 |
|
|
|
112.7 |
|
Mill stores and other supplies |
|
|
116.6 |
|
|
|
114.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
364.1 |
|
|
|
338.6 |
|
Excess of current cost over LIFO inventory value |
|
|
(10.8 |
) |
|
|
(10.7 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
353.3 |
|
|
$ |
327.9 |
|
|
8
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
5. |
|
Other (Income) Expense |
|
|
|
Other, net in the Consolidated Statement of Operations includes the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Foreign exchange (gain) loss |
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
Income from joint venture |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
Miscellaneous income |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.4 |
) |
|
6. |
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
|
|
|
The components of Accumulated other comprehensive loss in the Consolidated Balance Sheet are
as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plan additional minimum liabilities (1) |
|
$ |
(114.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(113.1 |
) |
Foreign currency translation (2) |
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
Unrealized gain on hedging transactions (3) |
|
|
28.9 |
|
|
|
76.3 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
(74.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(28.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net of deferred tax benefit of $66.0 million and $65.5 million, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
No tax effect is recorded for foreign currency translation since the foreign net assets
translated are deemed permanently invested. |
|
(3) |
|
Net of deferred tax expense of $17.7 million and $46.7 million, respectively. |
9
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
7. |
|
Loss Per Share |
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share are based on net loss and do not include any impact from Other
comprehensive loss. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(Unaudited, in millions, except per-share amounts) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic computation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(16.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(18.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(18.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(51.9 |
) |
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
57.2 |
|
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
57.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per common share |
|
$ |
(0.28 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.32 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.33 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted computation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(16.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(18.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(18.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(51.9 |
) |
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
57.2 |
|
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
57.2 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
57.2 |
|
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
57.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per common share |
|
$ |
(0.28 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.32 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.33 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.91 |
) |
|
|
|
The dilutive effect of options outstanding is calculated using the treasury stock method.
Options for approximately 5.1 million shares outstanding at September 30, 2005, and 4.7 million
shares outstanding at September 30, 2004 were excluded in the calculation of diluted earnings
per share as the impact would have been anti-dilutive. |
|
8. |
|
Pension and Postretirement Expense |
|
|
|
The components of net periodic benefit costs relating to Bowaters pension and other
postretirement plans are as follows for the three and nine-months ended September 30, 2005 and
2004: |
|
|
|
Pension Plans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
9.2 |
|
|
$ |
8.6 |
|
|
$ |
27.7 |
|
|
$ |
27.7 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
29.4 |
|
|
|
27.2 |
|
|
|
86.6 |
|
|
|
81.8 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(28.5 |
) |
|
|
(27.0 |
) |
|
|
(84.8 |
) |
|
|
(81.2 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
15.2 |
|
|
$ |
12.6 |
|
|
$ |
43.6 |
|
|
$ |
39.5 |
|
|
10
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
|
|
Other Postretirement Plans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
Curtailment gain |
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
|
$ |
13.1 |
|
|
$ |
19.0 |
|
|
|
|
The curtailment gain of $5.5 million is associated with changes to certain post-retirement
benefits in Canada. For segment reporting purposes, this curtailment gain is included in our
Coated and Specialty Papers Division. |
|
9. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
Bowater is involved in various legal proceedings relating to contracts, commercial disputes,
taxes, environmental issues, employment and workers compensation claims and other matters. We
periodically review the status of these proceedings with both inside and outside counsel. We
believe that the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition, but it could have a material adverse effect on the results of
operations in a given quarter or the year. |
|
|
|
There have been no material developments to the legal proceedings described in our annual
report on Form 10-K filed on March 16, 2005. |
|
10. |
|
Financial Instruments |
|
|
|
Bowater utilizes certain derivative instruments to enhance its ability to manage risk relating
to cash flow exposure. Derivative instruments are entered into for periods consistent with
related underlying cash flow exposures and do not constitute positions independent of those
positions. We do not enter into contracts for speculative purposes; however, we do, from time
to time enter into commodity and certain forward contracts that are not accounted for as
accounting hedges. On the date in which the derivative contract is entered, we designate the
derivative as a cash flow hedge. |
|
|
|
We pay a significant portion of the operating expenses of our Canadian mill sites in Canadian
dollars. To reduce our exposure to United States and Canadian dollar exchange rate
fluctuations, we have entered into and designated Canadian dollar forward contracts to hedge
certain of our forecasted Canadian dollar cash outflows at the Canadian mill operations. |
11
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
|
|
The components of the cash flow hedges included in Accumulated other comprehensive loss for
the three and nine-months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Gains reclassified to earnings on matured cash flow hedges |
|
$ |
(21.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(33.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(78.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(91.3 |
) |
Unrealized gain for change in value on
unmatured cash flow hedges |
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
55.2 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
28.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
22.2 |
|
|
|
(76.4 |
) |
|
|
(63.1 |
) |
Change in accrued income taxes |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in Accumulated other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(3.3 |
) |
|
$ |
13.8 |
|
|
$ |
(47.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(39.2 |
) |
|
|
|
We formally document all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as
well as our risk-management objectives and strategies for undertaking various hedge
transactions. We link all hedges that are designated as cash flow hedges to forecasted
transactions. The maximum time period we have hedged transactions is two years. We also
assess, both at the inception of the hedge and on an on-going basis, whether the derivatives
that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows
of hedged items. When it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge, we
discontinue hedge accounting prospectively. Hedge ineffectiveness associated with these
Canadian dollar forward contracts was not material for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2005. |
|
|
|
Information regarding our Canadian dollar contracts notional amount, carrying value, fair
market value, and range of exchange rates of the contracts is summarized in the table below.
The notional amount of these contracts represents the amount of foreign currencies to be
purchased or sold at maturity and does not represent our exposure on these contracts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset |
|
Range Of |
|
|
National |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
U.S.$/CDN$ |
September 30, 2005 |
|
Amount of |
|
Carrying |
|
Market |
|
Exchange |
(Unaudited, in millions of U.S. dollars) |
|
Derivatives |
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
Rates |
|
Foreign Currency Exchange Agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buy Currency: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in 2005 |
|
$ |
112.0 |
|
|
$ |
17.5 |
|
|
$ |
17.5 |
|
|
|
.7489-.7291 |
|
Due in 2006 |
|
|
183.0 |
|
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
.7609-.7124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
295.0 |
|
|
$ |
46.6 |
|
|
$ |
46.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to reduce our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations on our Canadian dollar denominated
long-term debt, we periodically enter into Canadian dollar forward contracts. These economic
hedge contracts are marked to market through earnings. The contracts are settled quarterly and
gains or losses are included in Other, net in our Consolidated Statement of Operations. The
Canadian dollar forward contracts in effect during the first quarter matured on March 30, 2005.
We recognized a gain of $0.9 million for the nine-months ended September 30, 2005, as a result
of these contracts. We have not entered into any new Canadian dollar forward contracts since the
fourth quarter of 2004. |
|
|
|
The counterparties to our derivative financial instruments are substantial and creditworthy
multi-national financial institutions and no one financial institution has more than 23% of our
derivative financial instruments. Therefore, the risk of counterparty nonperformance is
considered to be remote. |
12
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
11. |
|
Off-Balance Sheet Debt Guarantees |
|
|
|
Bowater has off-balance sheet debt guarantees of approximately $32.5 million at September 30,
2005, with $23.6 million related to Ponderay Newsprint Company and $8.9 million related to
Timber Note Holdings LLC, one of our Qualified Special Purpose Entities (QSPEs). |
|
|
|
Bowater has a 40% interest in Ponderay Newsprint Company, an unconsolidated partnership.
Ponderay has a credit facility which is comprised of a term loan and a revolving credit
facility. The term loan balance at September 30, 2005, was $59.0 million and is guaranteed by
the partners of Ponderay. Bowater guarantees 40%, or $23.6 million of this term loan. The
revolving credit facility has commitments from the lender for $25 million. This revolving
credit facility is not guaranteed by the partners. At September 30, 2005, there is a $10
million letter of credit reducing this commitment. There are no other drawings on this
facility. Ponderays outstanding balance on the term loan is reduced annually by its excess
cash flows as defined in the credit facility and, although the final balance is due at maturity
on April 12, 2006, Ponderay is in the process of renewing this facility. The term loan cannot
be increased once paid down, therefore, Bowaters guarantee is reduced as the outstanding
balance is reduced. Bowater would be required to perform on the guarantee if Ponderay were to
default on its credit facility and Ponderays assets, which collateralize the debt, were
insufficient to pay off the credit facility. Ponderay was in compliance with all its debt
covenants as of September 30, 2005. Ponderays total assets and liabilities at September 30,
2005, were approximately $158.9 million and $78.8 million (which includes the above mentioned
debt), respectively. |
|
|
|
In connection with Bowaters 1999 land sale and note monetization, we guarantee 25% of the
outstanding investor notes principal balance of Timber Note Holdings LLC, one of our QSPEs.
Bowater currently guarantees approximately $8.9 million of the investor notes principal balance.
This guarantee is proportionately reduced by annual principal repayments on the investor notes
(annual minimum repayments of $2.0 million) through 2008. The remaining investor notes
principal amount is to be repaid in 2009. Timber Note Holdings LLC has assets of approximately
$40.0 million and obligations of approximately $35.7 million, which include the investor notes.
Bowater would be required to perform on the guarantee if the QSPE were to default on the
investor notes or if there were a default on the notes receivable. |
|
12. |
|
Segment Information |
|
|
|
Below is a description of the types of products and services from which each reportable segment
derives its revenues: |
|
|
|
Effective January 1, 2005, Bowater is organized into four divisions: the Newsprint Division, the
Coated and Specialty Papers Division, the Canadian Forest Products Division, and the Pulp
Division. The fifth division that existed in 2004, the Forest Products Division, was merged
into the Newsprint and Canadian Forest Products Divisions and the Thunder Bay mill was moved
from the Newsprint Division to the Coated and Specialty Papers Division. Except for the Pulp
Division, each division is responsible for the sales and marketing of distinct product lines and
the operation of certain manufacturing sites. The Pulp Division is primarily a marketing and
distribution division whose administrative expenses are included in Corporate & Other
Eliminations. Therefore, the other three divisions are our reportable segments. Prior year
results have been restated to facilitate comparisons to the 2005 presentation. |
|
|
|
newsprint division |
|
|
|
The Newsprint Division operates six manufacturing sites (including Ponderay Newsprint Company,
an unconsolidated partnership) in the United States, Canada and South Korea. The principal
product at these manufacturing sites is newsprint, but several of the sites also produce market
and fluff pulp and uncoated specialty papers. This division has primary responsibility for the
domestic and international marketing and sales of newsprint. The division also manages 1.0
million acres of owned or leased timberland in the United |
13
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
|
|
States and the Canadian province of
Nova Scotia on which we have cutting rights. Effective January 1, 2005 the Thunder Bay mill
became part of the Coated and Specialty Papers Division. |
|
|
|
coated and specialty papers division |
|
|
|
The Coated and Specialty Papers Division operates a manufacturing site that produces coated and
uncoated specialty papers and market pulp and two Nuway coating facilities, all three located in
the United States. This division also operates a manufacturing site in Canada which produces
newsprint, specialty papers and market pulp. Effective January 1, 2005, the Thunder Bay mill
became part of the Coated and Specialty Papers Division. This division has primary
responsibility for the marketing and sales of the full spectrum of coated and uncoated specialty
papers manufactured by Bowater. The division also manages 8.4 million acres of Crown-owned land
in the Canadian province of Ontario on which we have cutting rights. |
|
|
|
canadian forest products division |
|
|
|
The Canadian Forest Products Division operates four paper manufacturing sites in Canada. The
division manages 0.4 million acres of owned or leased timberland and approximately 21.2 million
acres of Crown-owned land in the Canadian provinces of Quebec and New Brunswick on which we have
cutting rights. The division also operates twelve sawmills, supplies wood to four paper mills
and seven sawmills, and is responsible for the marketing and sales of its timber and lumber
production. Effective January 1, 2005, the sawmill operations of the Forest Products Division
were merged into the Canadian Forest Products Division. |
|
|
|
pulp division |
|
|
|
The Pulp Division markets and distributes market pulp produced by other divisions. Financial
results for the production and sale of market pulp are included in the Newsprint Division or the
Coated and Specialty Papers Division, depending upon which site manufactures the product. The
Pulp Divisions selling and administrative expenses are included in Corporate and Other
Eliminations. Accordingly, no separate results are reported for this division. |
|
|
|
Factors management used to identify our segments: |
|
|
|
Bowaters reportable segments are business units responsible for the marketing and sales of
different products. They are managed separately because of the different products they are
responsible for manufacturing and distributing. |
|
|
|
The line entitled Segment income (loss) in the following tables is equal to Operating income
(loss) as presented in our Consolidated Statement of Operations. In addition, none of the
income or loss items following Operating income in our Consolidated Statement of Operations
are allocated to our segments, since they are reviewed separately by Bowaters management. |
14
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
|
|
The following tables summarize information about segment profit and loss for the three and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 and segment assets as of September 30, 2005
and 2004: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coated |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
Canadian |
|
on Fixed |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty |
|
Forest |
|
Assets |
|
Corporate/ |
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
Newsprint |
|
Papers |
|
Products |
|
and Land |
|
Other |
|
|
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
Division |
|
Division |
|
Division |
|
Sales |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales- external customers |
|
$ |
312.4 |
|
|
$ |
286.3 |
|
|
$ |
277.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2.9 |
) |
|
$ |
872.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income (loss) |
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at 9/30/05 |
|
|
2,038.8 |
|
|
|
1,376.4 |
|
|
|
1,385.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
485.7 |
|
|
|
5,286.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coated |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
Canadian |
|
on Fixed |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty |
|
Forest |
|
Assets |
|
Corporate/ |
|
|
September 30, 2004 |
|
Newsprint |
|
Papers |
|
Products |
|
and Land |
|
Other |
|
|
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
Division |
|
Division |
|
Divison |
|
Sales |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales- external customers |
|
$ |
296.8 |
|
|
$ |
274.5 |
|
|
$ |
264.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2.0 |
) |
|
$ |
834.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income (loss) |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
40.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at 9/30/04 |
|
|
2,100.9 |
|
|
|
1,445.9 |
|
|
|
1,400.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
511.8 |
|
|
|
5,458.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coated |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
Canadian |
|
on Fixed |
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty |
|
Forest |
|
Assets |
|
Corporate/ |
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
Newsprint |
|
Papers |
|
Products |
|
and Land |
|
Other |
|
|
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
Division |
|
Division |
|
Division |
|
Sales |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales- external customers |
|
$ |
949.9 |
|
|
$ |
851.3 |
|
|
$ |
816.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(10.6 |
) |
|
$ |
2,607.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income |
|
|
52.8 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
122.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coated |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
Canadian |
|
on Fixed |
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty |
|
Forest |
|
Assets |
|
Corporate/ |
|
|
September 30, 2004 |
|
Newsprint |
|
Papers |
|
Products |
|
and Land |
|
Other |
|
|
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
Division |
|
Division |
|
Division |
|
Sales |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales- external customers |
|
$ |
869.9 |
|
|
$ |
781.7 |
|
|
$ |
723.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(8.1 |
) |
|
$ |
2,367.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income (loss) |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
36.4 |
|
|
|
37.1 |
|
|
15
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Organization
Effective January 1, 2005, Bowater is organized into four divisions: the Newsprint Division, the
Coated and Specialty Papers Division, the Canadian Forest Products Division, and the Pulp Division.
The fifth division that existed in 2004, the Forest Products Division, was merged into the
Newsprint and Canadian Forest Products Divisions and the Thunder Bay mill was moved from the
Newsprint Division to the Coated and Specialty Papers Division. Except for the Pulp Division, each
division is responsible for the sales and marketing of distinct product lines and the operation of
certain manufacturing sites. The Pulp Division is primarily a marketing and distribution division
whose administrative expenses are included in Corporate & Other Eliminations. Therefore, the
other three divisions are our reportable segments. Prior year results have been restated to
facilitate comparisons to the 2005 presentation. For further information regarding our segments,
see Note 12 (Segment Information) of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in
this quarterly report.
Cautionary Statements Regarding Forward-Looking Information and Use of Third Party Data
Statements that are not reported financial results or other historical information are
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. Forward-looking statements include, for example, statements about our business outlook,
assessment of market conditions, strategies, future plans, future sales, prices for our major
products, inventory levels, capital spending and tax and exchange rates. These forward-looking
statements are not guarantees of future performance. These statements are based on managements
expectations that involve a number of business risks and uncertainties, any of which could cause
actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking
statements. In addition to specific factors described in connection with any particular
forward-looking statement, factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include,
but are not limited to, those described under the caption Cautionary Statements Regarding
Forward-Looking Information and Use of Third Party Data in Bowaters annual report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2004, and from time to time, in Bowaters other filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, other risks could adversely affect us, as it is
not possible for us to predict or assess all risks. We disclaim any obligation to publicly update
or revise any forward-looking statements even if our situation changes in the future.
Information about industry or general economic conditions contained in this report are derived from
third party sources (e.g., trade publications) that Bowater believes are widely accepted and
accurate; however, Bowater has not independently verified this information and cannot provide
assurances of its accuracy.
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The following discussion and analysis provides information that we believe is useful in
understanding our operating results, cash flows and financial condition on our unaudited
Consolidated Financial Statements included in this quarterly report. Our significant accounting
policies are described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Bowaters annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. Bowaters critical accounting policies
and estimates are described under the caption Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates in Item
7 of Bowaters annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles
requires us to make estimates, assumptions and judgments and rely on projections of future results
of operations and cash flows. We base our estimates and assumptions on historical data and other
assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates and
assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities in our financial statements. In addition, they affect the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
16
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Our judgments are based on our assessment as to the effect certain estimates, assumptions of future
trends or events may have on the financial condition and results of operations reported in our
Consolidated Financial Statements. It is important that the reader of our financial statements understand that actual results could
differ materially from these estimates, assumptions, projections and judgments.
Overview of Financial Performance
Our net loss for the third quarter of 2005 was $16.0 million, as compared to a net loss of $18.1
million for the same period in 2004. Our third quarter cash flow from operating activities
exceeded our capital spending and dividends by $40.9 million, resulting in debt reduction of $75.5
million, or net of cash, $47.8 million. In the third quarter of 2005, we spent approximately $40
million on capital projects. Our total debt to capitalization ratio, calculated in accordance with
our revolving credit facility, decreased slightly to 59.9%.
During the third quarter of 2005, prices increased for newsprint and coated and specialty papers,
but declined for market pulp and lumber. Shipments for all of our product lines decreased compared
to the second quarter of 2005. Our sales in the third quarter of 2005 were $872.9 million, a 4.7%
increase from the third quarter of 2004 and a 2.7% decrease from the second quarter of 2005.
Compared to the third quarter of 2004, our costs during the third quarter were higher primarily due
to the stronger Canadian dollar, which increased from an average rate of US$0.76 to US$0.83, lower
production volumes, higher maintenance costs, and higher energy costs related to hurricane Katrina.
As compared to the third quarter of 2004, our unit manufacturing costs were up 9% in newsprint,
15% in market pulp, 5% in coated and specialty papers and 3% in lumber. Consolidated Results of
Operations on page 18 provides more information regarding changes in our manufacturing costs
during the third quarter of 2005.
Newsprint demand in North America declined 6.8% in the third quarter of 2005 compared to the same
period last year, reflecting continuing conservation measures taken by publishers, reduced North
American newspaper circulation and substitution by other uncoated mechanical grades. Coated
mechanical demand in North America declined 6.9% due primarily to capacity constraints related to
industry work stoppages as compared to the same period of 2004. Uncoated mechanical demand
decreased by 5.9% and supercalendered high gloss specialty paper demand decreased by 3.8%. Global
market pulp demand increased 5%.
Outlook
Prices for our products have improved substantially over the past several years; however, these
gains have been largely offset by increased costs in 2005 primarily from the
continuing strengthening of the Canadian dollar, including reduced
benefits from our Canadian dollar hedging transactions, and higher energy costs. In order to mitigate a portion
of the increased costs, we are billing freight and energy surcharges of $20 per ton for our coated
and supercalendar grades, and $5 on all of our other uncoated mechanical grades for the fourth
quarter. We will continue to focus on enhancing our product mix and examining our costs. We
recently announced a cost reduction program that we expect to reduce annual operating costs by $80
million and to fully implement by the end of 2006. In addition to this cost reduction program, we
announced our intention to sell certain assets that are expected to generate proceeds in excess of
$300 million over the same period. The assets consist mostly of North American timberland assets.
As these plans are implemented, the carrying value of these timberland assets will be reclassified
to assets held for sale on our balance sheet. We do not expect that the reclassification of these
timberland assets will have a negative impact on our current carrying value.
We believe that North American newsprint demand could continue to decline over the next few years.
Our newsprint capacity will also decline as we continue to shift production to coated and specialty
grades. As previously announced, our Board of Directors approved an $80 million investment to
convert approximately 200,000 metric tons of annual newsprint production at our Calhoun mill to
higher-margin specialty grades. The conversion project is in process and is expected to be
completed by mid-2006. The specialty grades to be produced will focus on the growing direct mail
and related advertising markets. After the project is completed, we anticipate
17
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
that the Calhoun
site, which once produced 730,000 metric tons of newsprint annually, will produce 465,000 short
tons of specialty grades and 300,000 metric tons of newsprint
annually.
In addition to the conversion at Calhoun, we have an opportunity to convert newsprint production to
high margin light-weight coated grades at our Thunder Bay mill. Any implementation of this
initiative would take into account our financial flexibility and debt reduction efforts as well as
the long-term competitive outlook of the site. In consideration of our third quarter results and the challenges of the current business environment,
timing for a final decision on this project remains uncertain.
We believe our operations are positioned to deliver quality products and that capital reinvestment
in the business can be held to acceptable levels. We expect to spend $160 $170 million in 2005,
compared to projected depreciation expense of $330 million.
Consolidated Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
872.9 |
|
|
$ |
834.0 |
|
|
$ |
38.9 |
|
|
$ |
2,607.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,367.3 |
|
|
$ |
240.1 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
|
40.7 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
122.6 |
|
|
|
37.1 |
|
|
|
85.5 |
|
|
Significant items that increased (decreased) operating income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product pricing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
61.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
250.6 |
|
Distribution costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.7 |
) |
Manufacturing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(154.0 |
) |
Asset impairment charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.9 |
) |
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.3 |
) |
Net gain on fixed assets and land sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
85.5 |
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2005 versus September 30, 2004
Sales increased in the third quarter of 2005 as compared to the third quarter of 2004 due primarily
to higher transaction prices for newsprint and coated and specialty papers and increased shipments
of coated papers, partially offset by lower transaction prices for pulp and lumber and lower
shipments of newsprint, specialty papers and pulp as further noted in the Product Line
Information section.
Operating income increased in the third quarter of 2005 as compared to the third quarter of 2004.
The above table analyzes the major items that increased operating income. A brief explanation of
these major items follows:
Product pricing for our newsprint and coated and specialty papers product groups was higher in
the third quarter of 2005 as compared to the third quarter of 2004. Please refer to the
discussion of Product Line Information for a more detailed analysis of product pricing and
shipments.
Manufacturing costs were higher in the third quarter of 2005 as compared to the third quarter of
2004 resulting primarily from a stronger Canadian dollar ($40.3 million), higher energy costs
($11.9 million), lower volumes ($9.0 million), and higher chemical costs ($3.2 million). These
cost increases were partially offset by lower labor and fringe costs ($3.6 million) and lower
recycled fiber costs ($1.5 million).
Net gain on fixed assets and land sales relates primarily to land sales and the disposition of
fixed assets. The increase is due to higher land sales in the third quarter of 2005 compared to
the third quarter of 2004.
18
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Nine months ended September 30, 2005 versus September 30, 2004
Sales increased in the first nine months of 2005 as compared to the first nine months of 2004 due
primarily to higher transaction prices for all products and increased shipments of coated and
specialty papers and lumber as further noted in the Product Line Information section.
Operating income increased in the first nine months of 2005 as compared to the first nine months of
2004. The above table analyzes the major items that increased operating income. A brief
explanation of these major items follows:
Product pricing for all of our major product groups was higher in the first nine months of 2005
as compared to the first nine months of 2004. Please refer to the discussion of Product Line
Information for a more detailed analysis of product pricing and shipments.
Distribution costs were higher in the first nine months of 2005 as compared to the first nine
months of 2004 as a result of increased shipments to export markets and increased fuel costs.
Manufacturing costs were higher in the first nine months of 2005 as compared to the first nine
months of 2004 resulting primarily from a stronger Canadian dollar ($101.0 million), higher
costs for energy ($20.5 million), chemicals ($11.0 million), wood ($10.3 million), repair
materials ($4.8 million), and recycled fiber ($2.5 million). These cost increases were
partially offset by lower depreciation expense ($9.0 million) and improved volumes ($2.2
million).
Asset impairment charge associated with the permanent shut of line No. 1 at our Benton Harbor
facility was recognized during the second quarter of 2005.
Selling and administrative expenses were higher in the first nine months of 2005 as compared to
the first nine months of 2004 due to lower capital tax refunds ($4.3 million), higher
employee-related expenses ($4.0 million), and higher professional fees and other expenses ($4.0
million).
Net gain on fixed assets and land sales relates primarily to land sales and the disposition of
fixed assets. The increase is due to higher land sales in the first nine months of 2005
compared to the first nine months of 2004.
19
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Division/Segments and Product Line Information
Bowater is organized by division. Bowater also provides product line disclosures for
informational purposes to our analysts and investors. The divisions have operational
responsibility over their group of operating assets. The divisions also have sales
responsibilities that overlap several of the Companys operating divisions/segments. The matrix
below depicts the various products that are manufactured by each of the Companys operating
divisions/segments and corresponding sales dollars for the nine months ended September 30, 2005,
and depicts the division that is responsible for the sale of the product line for the entire
company.
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coated & |
|
Canadian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty |
|
Forest |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and |
|
|
|
|
Newsprint |
|
Papers |
|
Products |
|
Pulp |
|
Other |
|
|
Product Line |
|
Division |
|
Division |
|
Division |
|
Division |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
|
Newsprint |
|
$ |
646.1 |
* |
|
$ |
111.0 |
|
|
$ |
298.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,055.1 |
|
Coated & Specialties |
|
|
138.3 |
|
|
|
479.0 |
* |
|
|
205.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
822.1 |
|
Pulp |
|
|
150.5 |
|
|
|
261.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
408.2 |
|
Lumber |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298.0 |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298.0 |
|
Other |
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
949.9 |
|
|
$ |
851.3 |
|
|
$ |
816.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(10.6 |
) |
|
$ |
2,607.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates division responsible for the sale of product line for the entire company |
Product Line Information
Presented below is a discussion of each significant product line followed by a discussion of the
results of each of the reported divisions.
In general, our products are globally-traded commodities. Pricing and the level of shipments of
these products will continue to be influenced by the balance between supply and demand as affected
by global economic conditions, changes in consumption and capacity, the level of customer and
producer inventories and fluctuations in currency exchange rates.
Newsprint Product Line
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Sales (in millions) |
|
$ |
347.9 |
|
|
$ |
336.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,055.1 |
|
|
$ |
987.2 |
|
Average prices (per metric ton) |
|
$ |
591 |
|
|
$ |
532 |
|
|
$ |
576 |
|
|
$ |
520 |
|
Shipments (thousands of metric tons) |
|
|
588.3 |
|
|
|
633.3 |
|
|
|
1,833.1 |
|
|
|
1,899.6 |
|
Downtime (thousands of metric tons) |
|
|
71.3 |
|
|
|
43.0 |
|
|
|
154.4 |
|
|
|
135.1 |
|
Inventory at end of period (thousands of metric tons) |
|
|
100.9 |
|
|
|
85.7 |
|
|
|
100.9 |
|
|
|
85.7 |
|
|
20
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Three months ended September 30, 2005, versus September 30, 2004
Our average newsprint transaction price for all markets was 11.1% higher in the third quarter of
2005 compared to the third quarter of 2004. The increase reflects the realization of price
increases in the North American and International markets. Newsprint shipments were 7.1% lower in
the third quarter of 2005. Inventory increased 17.7% during the third quarter of 2005 compared to
the same period in 2004 primarily due to increased export shipments and transportation delays
associated with recent hurricane activity in the southern United States.
During the third quarter of 2005, we took approximately 56,000 tons of market downtime at our
Thunder Bay mill, which included approximately 20,000 tons related to a 19-day outage in July 2005
as a result of high wood and energy costs. We plan to take approximately 53,000 metric tons of
market and maintenance downtime in the fourth quarter of 2005, which primarily includes market
downtime of approximately 37,000 metric tons attributable to an idled newsprint machine at our
Thunder Bay mill (since late June 2003) and maintenance downtime of approximately 10,000 metric
tons at our Mokpo, Korea facility. We expect the market downtime at our Thunder Bay mill to
continue until market conditions improve. We will continue to match production to orders.
We recently informed our North American customers of a $35 per metric ton price increase, effective
October 1, 2005.
Newsprint Third Party Data: In the three months ended September 30, 2005, total U.S. demand and
consumption of newsprint decreased 6.8% and 6.3%, respectively as compared to the same period last
year. North American net exports of newsprint increased 5.5% from 2004 levels. Total inventories
(North American mills and users) at September 30, 2005 were 1.3 million metric tons, approximately
113,000 metric tons, or 8%, lower than September 30, 2004. At September 30, 2005 the days of
supply at the U.S. daily newspapers was 40 days, down from 41 days at September 30, 2004. The
North American operating rate was 94% for the three months ended September 30, 2005. Newspaper
advertising linage declined 3.0% in August as compared to August 2004.
Nine months ended September 30, 2005, versus September 30, 2004
Our average newsprint transaction price for all markets was 10.8% higher in the first nine months
of 2005 compared to the first nine months of 2004. The increase reflects the realization of price
increases in the North American and International markets. Our newsprint shipments decreased by
3.5% in the first nine months of 2005 primarily due to increases in specialty papers production on
our newsprint machines. Our newsprint shipments to international markets have increased 20% during
the first nine months of 2005 compared to the same period of 2004.
Newsprint Third Party Data: In the first nine months of 2005, total U.S. demand and consumption of
newsprint decreased 6.7% and 5.2%, respectively as compared to the same period last year. North
American net exports of newsprint increased 7.4% from 2004 levels. Newspaper advertising linage
declined 1.5% in the first eight months of 2005 compared to the same period last year.
21
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Coated and Specialty Papers Product Line
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Sales (in millions) |
|
$ |
290.6 |
|
|
$ |
244.6 |
|
|
$ |
822.1 |
|
|
$ |
664.8 |
|
Average prices (per short ton) |
|
$ |
730 |
|
|
$ |
628 |
|
|
$ |
702 |
|
|
$ |
602 |
|
Shipments (thousands of short tons) |
|
|
397.9 |
|
|
|
389.8 |
|
|
|
1,170.5 |
|
|
|
1,104.9 |
|
Downtime (thousands of short tons) |
|
|
20.8 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
|
|
|
69.2 |
|
|
|
77.2 |
|
Inventory at end of period
(thousands of short tons) |
|
|
50.4 |
|
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
|
50.4 |
|
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2005, versus September 30, 2004
Our average transaction price for coated paper was 19.3% higher in the third quarter of 2005
compared to the third quarter of 2004 due to the realization of price increases in 2004 and 2005,
as well as the addition of higher value, ultra-light weight coated grades to our mix. Our coated
mechanical papers shipments increased 8.2% in the third quarter of 2005 as compared to the third
quarter of 2004 due to improved production efficiencies and increases in our orders that were
influenced by labor disputes at competitors mills, which have been subsequently resolved. Our
average transaction price for specialty papers was 11.4% higher in the third quarter of 2005
compared to the third quarter of 2004 due to the realization of price increases in 2004 and 2005.
Our shipments of specialty papers decreased 3.6% in the third quarter of 2005 compared to the third
quarter of 2004 due to the timing of shipments and invoicing. Market downtime in the third quarter
of 2005 was taken at our Nuway facilities as we ran these sites on a four-day-per-week schedule.
We recently announced a price increase of $35 per short ton for all of our low-bright, uncoated
mechanical grades for our North American customers, effective November 1, 2005.
Coated and Specialty Papers Third Party Data: U.S. consumer magazine advertising pages decreased
0.3% in the three months ended September 30, 2005 compared to the three months ended September 30,
2004. North American demand for coated mechanical papers decreased 6.9% in the three months ended
September 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. North American demand for
supercalendered high gloss papers and other uncoated mechanical papers was down 3.8%
and down 6.0% respectively, in the three months ended September 30, 2005 compared to the same
period in 2004.
Nine months ended September 30, 2005, versus September 30, 2004
Our average transaction price for coated paper was 19.8% higher in the first nine months of 2005
compared to the first nine months of 2004 due to the realization of price increases in 2004 and
2005, as well as the addition of higher value, ultra-light weight coated grades to our mix. Our
coated mechanical papers shipments increased 7.8% in the first nine months of 2005 as compared to
the first nine months of 2004 due to improved production yields and increases in our orders that
were influenced by labor disputes at our competitors mills. Our average transaction price for
specialty papers was 12.6% higher in the first nine months of 2005 compared to the first nine
months of 2004 due to the realization of price increases and increased sales of higher-brightness,
higher-value grades. Our shipments of specialty papers increased 4.1% in the first nine months of
2005 compared to the first nine months of 2004 due in part to customers downgrading from
traditional freesheet grades produced by our competitors to our new high-bright uncoated papers and
other customers upgrading from newsprint to specialties. Market downtime in the first nine months
of 2005 was taken at our Nuway facilities.
22
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Coated and Specialty Papers Third Party Data: U.S. magazine advertising pages increased 1.0% in
the first nine months of 2005 compared to the first nine months of 2004. North American demand for
coated mechanical papers decreased 3.0% in the first nine months of 2005 compared to the first nine
months of 2004. North American
demand for supercalendered high gloss papers and other uncoated mechanical papers was
up 5.3% and up 2.5%, respectively, in the first nine months of 2005 compared to the first nine
months of 2004.
Market
Pulp Product Line
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Sales (in millions) |
|
$ |
127.4 |
|
|
$ |
135.3 |
|
|
$ |
408.2 |
|
|
$ |
411.5 |
|
Average prices (per metric ton) |
|
$ |
518 |
|
|
$ |
527 |
|
|
$ |
536 |
|
|
$ |
515 |
|
Shipments (thousands of metric tons) |
|
|
245.9 |
|
|
|
256.5 |
|
|
|
761.9 |
|
|
|
799.2 |
|
Downtime (thousands of metric tons) |
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
42.3 |
|
|
|
31.3 |
|
Inventory at end of period (thousands of metric tons) |
|
|
67.8 |
|
|
|
62.2 |
|
|
|
67.8 |
|
|
|
62.2 |
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2005, versus September 30, 2004
Our average transaction price for market pulp was 1.7% lower in the third quarter of 2005 compared
to the third quarter of 2004. Shipments were lower during the third quarter of 2005 as a result of
increased internal consumption and increased maintenance downtime. Our market pulp inventories
ended the third quarter of 2005 at 23 days supply. Generally, our inventories are below the
industry average because our mills are geographically closer to the markets they serve. In the
third quarter, we took approximately 18,800 metric tons of maintenance downtime at our Calhoun,
Coosa Pines and Thunder Bay facilities. In the fourth quarter of 2005, our Coosa Pines mill will
be down for scheduled maintenance, removing approximately 20,000 metric tons of production. We
have increased our market pulp inventory prior to the shut.
Due to improved market conditions we informed our paper-grade North American softwood customers of
a $20 per metric ton price increase, effective October 1, 2005.
Market Pulp Third Party Data: World demand for market pulp increased 5% in the three months ended
September 30, 2005 compared to the same period last year. World
producers shipped at 92% of
capacity during the three months ended September 30, 2005 compared to 91% during the same period in
2004.
Nine months ended September 30, 2005, versus September 30, 2004
Our average transaction price for market pulp was 4.1% higher in the first nine months of 2005
compared to the first nine months of 2004. The increase reflects the realization of price
increases brought about by improved world supply and demand during 2004 and the first quarter of
2005 offset by a slowing demand in the third quarter of 2005. Temporary and permanent supply
reductions coupled with improved demand from paper makers combined to help improve market
conditions in the first nine months of 2005 compared to the first nine months of 2004 despite the
slowing market demand in the third quarter of 2005. Shipments were lower during the first nine
months of 2005 as a result of increased maintenance downtime and increased internal consumption.
Maintenance downtime at our Calhoun, Catawba, Coosa Pines and Thunder Bay facilities resulted in
the removal of approximately 42,000 metric tons of pulp from production during the first nine
months of 2005.
23
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Market Pulp Third Party Data: World demand for market pulp increased 1.4% in the first nine months
of 2005 compared to the same period last year. World producers shipped at 92% of capacity during
the first nine months of 2005 compared to 93% for the same period in 2004. World producer
inventories have decreased to 33 days supply as of September 30, 2005, which is 7 days less than
the corresponding period in 2004.
Lumber Product Line
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Sales (in millions) |
|
$ |
95.9 |
|
|
$ |
107.4 |
|
|
$ |
298.0 |
|
|
$ |
281.0 |
|
Average prices (per metric ton) |
|
$ |
348 |
|
|
$ |
395 |
|
|
$ |
364 |
|
|
$ |
360 |
|
Shipments (thousands of metric tons) |
|
|
275.6 |
|
|
|
271.5 |
|
|
|
819.1 |
|
|
|
780.8 |
|
Downtime (thousands of metric tons) |
|
|
41.3 |
|
|
|
74.1 |
|
|
|
159.2 |
|
|
|
224.0 |
|
Inventory at end of period (thousands of metric tons) |
|
|
50.5 |
|
|
|
64.0 |
|
|
|
50.5 |
|
|
|
64.0 |
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2005, versus September 30, 2004
Lumber prices decreased in the third quarter of 2005 as compared to the third quarter of 2004 as a
result of market volatility. Weak pricing conditions have continued into the fourth quarter. Our
lumber shipments increased 1.5% in the third quarter of 2005 due primarily to the increased output
at our Thunder Bay sawmill, which had been closed during the third quarter of 2004 due to wood
supply shortages.
Third party data: The U.S. housing starts increased 10.3% in the third quarter of 2005 as compared
to the same period last year.
Nine months ended September 30, 2005, versus September 30, 2004
Lumber prices increased in the first nine months of 2005 as compared to the first nine months of
2004 as a result of market volatility and continued high demand which was fueled by record housing
starts. Our lumber shipments increased 4.9% in the first nine months of 2005 due primarily to the
increased output at our Maniwaki sawmill following completion of the modernization project in
December 2003 and increased output at our Thunder Bay sawmill which experienced downtime in 2004
due to wood supply shortages.
Lumber duties imposed by the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC) became effective for lumber
shipments beginning May 22, 2002. The DOC imposed antidumping duties (ADD) of 8.43% on all of
Bowaters Canadian softwood lumber imports and countervailing duties (CVD) of 18.79% on softwood
lumber imported from all provinces except New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. Since May 22, 2002
Bowater has been posting cash deposits to cover the duties. On December 20, 2004 the CVD rate was
adjusted to 17.18% and the ADD rate was adjusted to 4.03% for the period of May 22, 2002 to April
30, 2003 pursuant to a review by the DOC. The CVD rate was amended to 16.37% on February 24, 2005
and the ADD rate was amended to 3.78% on January 24, 2005. Bowater began to accrue on these new
published rates and will continue to accrue and pay duties based on rates established by the DOC
until new rates are published. Lumber duties are included as a component of distribution costs on
our consolidated statement of operations.
The Canadian government has appealed the duties to the World Trade Organization (WTO) and under the
terms of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and requested that the duties be refunded.
The final amount of CVD and ADD that may be assessed on Canadian softwood lumber imports into the
U.S. will depend upon negotiations among the governments involved in the dispute or upon
determinations made by the NAFTA, WTO or other adjudicatory panels to which the duties may be
appealed. Until the dispute about the duties is resolved, we will continue to pay the duties as
required by the DOC. To date, we have paid CV and AD duties of
approximately
24
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
$93.7 million.
Should these duty rates be eliminated or decreased, a portion or all of the $93.7 million could be
reversed into operating income in future periods.
The Province of Québec has mandated that annual harvests of softwood timber on Crown-owned land
will be reduced 20% below 2004 levels. The 20% reduction will be achieved, on average, for the
three year period beginning April 1, 2005 and ending March 31, 2008. We do not expect that these
requirements will have
any material impact on our results of operations or financial condition in 2005. We are assessing
the impact of these reductions for future years.
Third party data: The U.S. housing starts increased 5.7% in the first nine months of 2005 as
compared to the same period last year.
Divisional Performance
Newsprint Division
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
(In millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Change |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Change |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
312.4 |
|
|
$ |
296.8 |
|
|
$ |
15.6 |
|
|
$ |
949.9 |
|
|
$ |
869.9 |
|
|
$ |
80.0 |
|
Segment income |
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
|
|
|
52.8 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
49.1 |
|
|
Significant items that increased (decreased) segment income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product pricing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
28.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
87.8 |
|
Distribution costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
Manufacturing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33.4 |
) |
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
49.1 |
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2005, versus September 30, 2004
Sales increased in the third quarter of 2005 as compared to the third quarter of 2004 primarily as
a result of higher product pricing for newsprint ($21.9 million), market pulp ($2.9 million) and
specialty papers ($3.9 million), and higher shipments of specialty papers ($3.4 million), and
market pulp ($0.5 million), partially offset by lower newsprint shipments ($17.1 million). See the
previous discussion of product line results.
Segment income increased in the third quarter of 2005 as compared to the third quarter of 2004
primarily as a result of higher product pricing and shipments noted above. These product pricing
improvements were partially offset by higher manufacturing costs. Manufacturing costs were higher
as a result of higher ($4.7 million) energy and chemical costs, a stronger Canadian
dollar ($5.7 million), and lower volumes ($4.9 million), partially offset by lower wood, recycled
fiber, repair, and other costs ($5.5 million).
Nine months ended September 30, 2005, versus September 30, 2004
Sales increased in the first nine months of 2005 as compared to the first nine months of 2004
primarily as a result of higher product pricing for newsprint ($63.9 million), market pulp ($11.3
million) and specialty papers ($11.1 million), and higher shipments of specialty papers ($21.1
million) and market pulp ($4.3 million). These product price and shipment increases were offset by
lower shipments of newsprint ($31.2 million). See the previous discussion of product line results.
25
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Segment income increased in the first nine months of 2005 as compared to the first nine months of
2004 primarily as a result of higher product pricing and shipments noted above. These product
pricing improvements were partially offset by higher manufacturing costs. Manufacturing costs were
higher as a result of higher prices for energy ($6.8 million) and chemicals ($7.2 million), lower
volumes ($3.3 million), and a stronger Canadian dollar ($18.9 million), partially offset by
improved wood and repair costs ($3.9 million).
Coated and Specialty Papers Division
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
(In millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Change |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Change |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
286.3 |
|
|
$ |
274.5 |
|
|
$ |
11.8 |
|
|
$ |
851.3 |
|
|
$ |
781.7 |
|
|
$ |
69.6 |
|
Segment income (loss) |
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
28.4 |
|
|
Significant
items that increased (decreased) segment income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product pricing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
99.5 |
|
Distribution costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
Manufacturing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55.3 |
) |
Asset impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.9 |
) |
Selling and
administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
28.4 |
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2005, versus September 30, 2004
Sales increased in the third quarter of 2005 as compared to the third quarter of 2004 primarily as
a result of increased product pricing in coated and specialty papers ($27.5 million) and newsprint
($4.1. million) and higher shipments of coated papers ($10.5 million). These product price and
shipment increases were partially offset by lower product pricing in pulp ($4.9 million) and lower
shipments of pulp ($6.0 million), newsprint ($13.8 million) and specialty papers ($5.4 million).
See the previous discussion of product line results.
Segment income increased in the third quarter of 2005 as compared to the third quarter of 2004
primarily as a result of higher product pricing and shipments noted above. These improvements were
partially offset by higher manufacturing costs including higher costs ($8.1 million) for chemicals
and energy, higher repair costs ($5.5 million), a stronger Canadian dollar ($7.5 million) and lower
volumes ($5.1 million). These increased manufacturing costs were partially offset by lower labor
and fringe costs ($4.6 million) and lower wood costs ($1.2 million).
Nine months ended September 30, 2005, versus September 30, 2004
Sales increased in the first nine months of 2005 as compared to the first nine months of 2004
primarily as a result of increased product pricing in coated and specialty papers ($81.1 million),
newsprint ($11.1 million) and market pulp ($7.3 million) and higher shipments of coated papers
($27.9 million). These product price and shipment increases were partially offset by lower
shipments of pulp ($23.9 million), newsprint ($19.3 million) and specialty papers ($14.7 million).
See the previous discussion of product line results.
Segment income increased in the first nine months of 2005 as compared to the first nine months of
2004 primarily as a result of higher product pricing and shipments noted above. These improvements
were partially offset by higher manufacturing costs including higher costs ($5.0 million) for wood
and recycled fiber, higher costs ($17.5 million) for energy and chemicals, higher repair costs
($8.5 million), a stronger Canadian dollar ($24.4 million), lower volumes ($3.1 million), and an
asset impairment charge, as noted below. These increased manufacturing
26
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
costs were partially offset
by lower depreciation expense ($7.1 million) and lower labor and fringe costs ($1.8 million).
During the second quarter of 2005, Bowater management decided to permanently shut the original line
at Benton Harbor, which resulted in a one time non-cash asset impairment charge of $11.9 million
during the second quarter of 2005. See Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for a detailed discussion of the asset impairment.
Canadian Forest Products Division
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
(In millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Change |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Change |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
277.1 |
|
|
$ |
264.7 |
|
|
$ |
12.4 |
|
|
$ |
816.8 |
|
|
$ |
723.8 |
|
|
$ |
93.0 |
|
Segment income (loss) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
(13.7 |
) |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
Significant items that increased (decreased) segment income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product pricing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
63.8 |
|
Distribution costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
Manufacturing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48.2 |
) |
Selling and
administrative
expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(13.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11.6 |
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2005, versus September 30, 2004
Sales increased in the third quarter of 2005 as compared to the third quarter of 2004 as a result
of higher product pricing for newsprint ($9.3 million), coated and specialty papers ($8.9 million),
and timber ($1.1 million) and higher shipments of newsprint ($6.8 million), partially offset by
lower lumber pricing ($12.4 million) and lower shipments of coated and specialty papers ($2.3
million). See the previous discussion of product line results.
Segment income decreased in the third quarter of 2005 as compared to the third quarter of 2004
primarily as a result of higher manufacturing costs. The higher manufacturing costs were due
primarily to a stronger Canadian dollar ($15.8 million) and higher costs for wood, energy, and
chemicals ($4.6 million), partially offset by improved volumes
($0.9 million). These manufacturing
cost increases were partially offset by increased sales as note above.
Nine months ended September 30, 2005, versus September 30, 2004
Sales increased in the first nine months of 2005 as compared to the first nine months of 2004 as a
result of higher product pricing for newsprint ($28.8 million), coated and specialty papers ($26.0
million), lumber ($7.1 million), and timber ($1.9 million), and higher shipments ($29.2 million)
for all products. See the previous discussion of product line results.
Segment income increased in the first nine months of 2005 as compared to the first nine months of
2004 primarily as a result of increased pricing as noted above. These improvements were partially
offset by higher manufacturing and distribution costs. The higher manufacturing costs were due
primarily to a stronger Canadian dollar ($45.0 million) and higher wood and fiber costs ($9.6
million), partially offset by lower costs for energy, repair materials, and labor ($2.8 million),
and improved volumes ($8.5 million).
27
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Net Gain on Fixed Assets and Land Sales and Corporate & Other Eliminations
Net gain on fixed assets and land sales and corporate and other eliminations are included in order
to reconcile division sales and segment income (loss) to our total sales and operating income on
our Consolidated Statement of Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
(In millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Change |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Change |
|
Net gain on fixed assets and
land sales |
|
$ |
9.9 |
|
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
8.2 |
|
|
$ |
30.7 |
|
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
|
$ |
24.8 |
|
Corporate & other eliminations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(10.6 |
) |
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
Segment income (loss) |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
(13.3 |
) |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
36.4 |
|
|
|
(28.4 |
) |
|
Net gain on fixed assets and land sales: During the three and nine months ended September 30,
2005, Bowater recorded a net pre-tax gain of $9.9 million and $30.7 million, respectively, related
primarily to the sale of land and fixed assets. During the three and nine months ended September
30, 2004, Bowater recorded a net pre-tax gain of $1.7 million, and $5.9 million, respectively,
related to the sale of land and fixed assets. The increase is primarily due to higher land sales
in 2005 compared to 2004.
Corporate & other eliminations: The elimination of intersegment sales increased $0.9 million and
$2.5 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively. Corporate
income decreased $13.3 million and $28.4 million during the three and nine months ended September
30, 2005, respectively. The decrease in segment income during the third quarter is due primarily
to lower gains on foreign currency hedges. The decrease during the nine month period is due
primarily to lower gains on foreign currency hedges, lower capital tax refunds and increased
general and administrative expenses.
Interest and Other Income and Expenses
Interest expense increased $1.6 million from $48.4 million for the third quarter of 2004 to $50.0
million for the third quarter of 2005. Interest expense increased $3.0 million from $146.5 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 to $149.5 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2005. This increase is primarily attributable to higher interest rates, partially offset by
lower average debt balances during the 2005 periods.
Other income decreased $0.4 million from $1.3 million during the third quarter of 2004 to $0.9
million during the third quarter of 2005. Other income decreased $2.6 million from $6.4 million
during the first nine months of 2004 to $3.8 million during the first nine months of 2005. The
decreases in both periods are primarily the result of an increase in foreign currency exchange
losses during 2005.
The majority of our exchange gain/loss amounts are attributable to the revaluation of unhedged
foreign denominated assets and liabilities into United States dollars. For a further discussion of
the effect of fluctuations in the Canadian U.S. Dollar exchange rates, see Canadian U.S.
Dollar Exchange Rate Fluctuation Effect on Earnings.
Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate varies frequently and substantially from the weighted-average effect of both
domestic and foreign statutory tax rates primarily as a result of the tax treatment on foreign
currency gains and losses. We have a number of foreign subsidiaries whose unconsolidated foreign
currency gains and losses are taxed locally. On
28
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
consolidation, a portion of such gains and losses
are eliminated but we are still impacted by the foreign taxes on such items. Due to the
variability and volatility of foreign exchange rates, we are unable to estimate the impact of
future changes in exchange rates on our effective tax rate.
Bowaters effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2005 was (467.7)% as compared to (226.4)%
during the same period last year. The effective tax rates for the third quarter of 2005 and 2004
were primarily impacted by the tax treatment on foreign currency gains and losses discussed
previously and the adjustments discussed below.
Income tax expense for the third quarter of 2005 includes expense adjustments of $7.9 million
related to a valuation allowance on certain Canadian deferred tax assets and an adjustment related
to a revised estimated effective tax rate for the year. These expense adjustments were partially
offset by the elimination of tax reserves of $4.2 million related to the expiration of the
associated statute of limitations during the third quarter of 2005 and the resolution of a prior
year tax examination.
Income tax expense for the third quarter of 2004 includes the elimination of income tax reserves of
$6.8 million associated with a statute of limitations expiration for pre-2001 Canadian tax years,
resulting in a decrease to income tax expense. These tax reserve adjustments in the third quarter
of 2004 were offset by an increase in tax expense related to a revised estimated effective tax rate
for the year.
Our effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2005 was (5.5)% versus 44.8% for the first
nine months of 2004. The effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2005 and 2004 were
primarily impacted by the tax treatment on foreign currency gains and losses discussed previously,
by permanent tax differences that are not dependent on pre-tax income (loss) and by the adjustments
as discussed above.
We are required to evaluate the future recoverability of deferred tax assets on a jurisdictional
basis. As part of this evaluation process, we continue to analyze all available evidence, both
positive and negative, including potential tax planning strategies, to determine if sufficient
future taxable income is available in each jurisdiction to support the realization of the deferred
tax assets. As a result of this evaluation process and as indicated above, we have recorded a
valuation allowance against certain Canadian deferred tax assets during the third quarter of 2005.
Future adjustments to these valuation allowances may be necessary should the likelihood of
realization of these deferred tax assets change.
29
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The primary components of our cash flows are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
(In millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(6.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.3 |
) |
|
Cash from operations |
|
|
143.3 |
|
|
|
85.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
(18.7 |
) |
|
|
(51.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to net loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unearned compensation on restricted stock |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
245.9 |
|
|
|
254.1 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
(55.4 |
) |
Net gain on land sales |
|
|
(30.7 |
) |
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
Minority interests in net loss of subsidiaries |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
Asset impairment |
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
(55.9 |
) |
|
|
(60.6 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(26.2 |
) |
|
|
(15.5 |
) |
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
42.4 |
|
|
|
57.1 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26.2 |
) |
|
|
|
Total working capital changes |
|
|
(35.1 |
) |
|
|
(45.2 |
) |
|
Cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(55.9 |
) |
|
|
(50.0 |
) |
Cash invested in fixed assets, timber and timberlands |
|
|
(89.6 |
) |
|
|
(60.3 |
) |
Disposition of fixed assets, timberlands and note monetizations |
|
|
33.7 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
Cash used for financing activities |
|
|
(93.8 |
) |
|
|
(40.0 |
) |
Short-term financing, net |
|
|
(47.1 |
) |
|
|
(142.6 |
) |
Long-term financing, net |
|
|
(14.3 |
) |
|
|
132.1 |
|
Dividends |
|
|
(34.3 |
) |
|
|
(34.6 |
) |
|
Cash From Operations
During the first nine months of 2005 and 2004, Bowater had net losses of $18.7 million and $51.9
million, respectively. Cash provided by operating activities totaled $143.3 million in the first
nine months of 2005 compared to $85.7 million during the same period of 2004. Cash generated from
operations increased $57.6 million for the first nine months of
2005 as compared to the same period in 2004, due
primarily to lower cash losses from operations. The lower cash losses in the first nine months of
2005 were primarily the result of higher product pricing partially offset by higher manufacturing
costs and lower shipments. (See discussion of manufacturing costs, distribution costs and product
pricing in the Product Line Information and Divisional Performance sections of our
Managements Discussion and Analysis). Deferred income tax benefits were lower during 2005 due
primarily to lower pre-tax loss in 2005 as compared to the same period last year.
30
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Working capital in the first nine months of 2005 was negatively impacted by an increase in accounts
receivable, which resulted primarily from higher pricing and higher inventory levels to support increased export shipments. These working
capital changes were partially offset by an increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
due to the timing of payments. Working capital in 2004 was negatively impacted by an increase in
accounts receivable primarily from higher pricing and timing of collection of our receivables,
higher inventory levels in our specialty paper and lumber product lines, and reductions in our
income taxes payable. These working capital changes were partially offset by an increase in
accounts payable and accrued liabilities primarily due to the timing of payments.
Cash Used for Investing Activities
Cash used for investing activities totaled $55.9 million and $50.0 million for the first nine
months of 2005 and 2004, respectively. The increase in cash used for investing activities during
the first nine months of 2005 is due primarily to increased capital expenditures, partially offset
by increased proceeds from land sales. For the first nine months of 2005, capital expenditures
have been primarily for compliance and maintenance requirements and return-based projects. We
expect capital expenditures to be approximately $160 to $170 million in 2005.
Cash Used for Financing Activities
Cash used for financing activities totaled $93.8 million and $40.0 million for the first nine
months of 2005 and 2004, respectively. Bowater paid cash dividends of
$34.3 million, had net payments of $47.1 million on its
short-term borrowings and net payments of $14.3 million on its
long-term debt during the
first nine months of 2005.
Cash generated from (used for) financing activities in the first nine months of 2004 includes the
sale of $250.0 million of registered notes that are due March 15, 2010. We received net proceeds
from the notes of $246.2 million, which were used to pay amounts outstanding under the short-term
bank debt credit facilities ($146.2 million) and the three-year term loan ($100.0 million).
Bowater paid cash dividends of $34.6 million in the first nine months of 2004.
Credit Arrangements:
As of September 30, 2005, Bowater had available borrowings on our short-term bank debt credit
facilities as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Commitment |
|
Termination |
|
Interest |
Short-Term Bank Debt |
|
Commitment |
|
Outstanding |
|
Available (1) |
|
Date |
|
Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions except for dates and interest rates) |
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility (2) |
|
$ |
435.0 |
|
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
|
$ |
332.7 |
|
|
|
04/07 |
|
|
|
8.25 |
% |
364-day Accounts Receivable
Securitization Arrangement
(3) |
|
|
200.0 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
149.0 |
|
|
|
12/05 |
|
|
|
3.81 |
% |
|
|
|
$ |
635.0 |
|
|
$ |
27.0 |
|
|
$ |
481.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.79 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The commitment available under the Revolving credit facility is subject to covenant
restrictions described on pages 32 33 of this Form 10-Q and is reduced by outstanding
letters of credit of $96.3 million. |
|
(2) |
|
Borrowings under the revolving credit facility incur interest based, at our option, on
specified market interest rates plus a margin tied to the credit rating of our long-term debt. |
|
(3) |
|
The amount that can be borrowed at any time under our 364-day accounts receivables
securitization arrangement depends on the amount and nature of the accounts receivable. The
interest rate is based on commercial paper issued by the lenders plus a margin. |
31
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Our revolving credit facility requires us to maintain a minimum consolidated net worth (generally
defined as common shareholders equity, excluding hedging gains in place as of December 31, 2003,
plus any outstanding preferred stock plus minimum pension liability amounts) of $1.4 billion, a
maximum 65.0% ratio of total debt to total capital (defined as total debt less revaluation of debt
assumed through acquisitions, plus net worth including minority interest, plus minimum pension
liability amounts), and an annual minimum EBITDA (generally defined as net income, excluding
extraordinary, non-recurring or non-cash items, plus income taxes plus depreciation plus net
interest expense) of $250.0 million measured quarterly beginning March 31, 2005, through December
31, 2005 and $400.0 million at the end of each quarter thereafter. If we generate net income, the
minimum net worth requirement increases by half of our consolidated net income for each fiscal
quarter, excluding gains from cash flow hedges in place as of December 31, 2003. At September 30,
2005, our consolidated net worth was approximately $1,524.3 million, and, calculated according to
our credit facilitys guidelines, our ratio of total debt to total capital was 59.9% and our
trailing-twelve-months EBITDA was $469.6 million.
32
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following tables reconcile EBITDA and debt as a percentage of total capitalization, as
calculated according to our credit facilitys guidelines, to our financial statements. We use
these measures and believe they are useful to investors because of their relevance to our credit
facility. The following table reconciles EBITDA as calculated according to our credit facilitys
guidelines to the line on our Consolidated Statement of Operations entitled Net income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited, in
millions) |
|
12/31/2004 |
|
3/31/2005 |
|
6/30/2005 |
|
9/30/2005 |
|
Rolling 4 Qtrs |
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(35.2 |
) |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
(3.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(16.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(53.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(10.1 |
) |
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
Depreciation, amortization and cost of timber harvested |
|
|
81.1 |
|
|
|
81.8 |
|
|
|
81.6 |
|
|
|
82.5 |
|
|
|
327.0 |
|
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest |
|
|
48.8 |
|
|
|
50.2 |
|
|
|
49.3 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
198.3 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
83.6 |
|
|
$ |
124.0 |
|
|
$ |
120.6 |
|
|
$ |
130.0 |
|
|
$ |
458.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance |
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
Minority interest in net income (loss) of subsidiaries |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
Foreign exchange (gain) loss |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Asset impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
Income from joint venture |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA, as calculated according to our
credit facilitys guidelines |
|
$ |
84.9 |
|
|
$ |
120.6 |
|
|
$ |
135.2 |
|
|
$ |
128.9 |
|
|
$ |
469.6 |
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of the GAAP items to the calculation of total debt as a percentage of total
capitalization, in accordance with our credit facility, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
2,450.6 |
|
Less: Revaluation of debt |
|
|
(69.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total debt, per credit facilities |
|
$ |
2,380.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalization: |
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
$ |
1,410.3 |
|
Total debt |
|
|
2,450.6 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
68.3 |
|
Less: Revaluation of debt |
|
|
(69.9 |
) |
Plus: Additional minimum pension liability, net of tax |
|
|
114.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization, per credit facilities |
|
$ |
3,973.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt as a percentage of total capitalization in accordance with credit facilities |
|
|
59.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Total debt as a percentage of total capitalization, in accordance with GAAP |
|
|
62.4 |
% |
|
We believe we are in compliance with all of our covenants and other requirements set forth in our
credit facilities.
We believe that cash generated from operations and access to our credit facilities will be
sufficient to provide for our anticipated requirements for working capital, contractual obligations
and capital expenditures for the next 12
33
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
months. In addition, we periodically review timberland
holdings and sell timberlands. See our Outlook section on page 17 of this report for a
description of our intention to sell certain North American timberland assets.
In April 2005, Moodys affirmed Bowaters credit ratings of Ba3 with a negative outlook. In
October 2005, S&P placed Bowaters credit rating on watch with a negative outlook. There is no way
to predict with certainty any future rating actions by these two agencies. The interest rates
associated with the bank lines of credit described above are based on Bowaters lowest credit
rating. Any reduction in the lowest rating will increase our cost of borrowing. In addition to
higher interest rates, although further downgrades would have no material impact on availability
under our present debt and credit agreements, it could impact our access to and cost of capital and
financial flexibility in the future.
Employees
As of September 30, 2005, Bowater employed 8,200 people, of whom 5,700 were represented by
bargaining units. Labor agreements covering approximately 2,200 employees at five of our nine
Canadian paper mills were ratified
July 8, 2005. These employees are represented predominantly by the Communications, Energy and
Paper Union (CEP). The agreements have effective dates of May 1, 2004, and will expire on April
30, 2009. The agreements provide for annual wage increases averaging 2.5% for each of the first two
years and averaging 2% annually thereafter as well as improvements and changes to pension and
employee benefits.
During the first nine months of 2005, labor agreements covering approximately 310 employees at
three sawmills and one woodlands operation expired. In April 2005, a labor agreement covering
approximately 200 employees at our Donnacona facility expired. The wage portion of the labor
agreement covering approximately 150 employees at our Mokpo, Korea
facility was renewed in August 2005 and expires in July 2006.
Additionally, in August 2005, a labor agreement covering approximately 235 employees at our Thunder
Bay woodlands operation expired.
While we consider relations with our employees to be good and we do not expect a work stoppage to
occur prior to the finalization of new labor agreements, we can provide no assurance regarding
these outcomes or the timing of these negotiations or their effect on our operations.
Canadian-U.S. Dollar Exchange Rate Fluctuation Effect on Earnings
Nearly half of our manufacturing costs and certain financial liabilities are denominated in
Canadian dollars. Sales are denominated in the currency of the country in which they occur.
Accordingly, changes in the Canadian-U.S. dollar exchange rate may significantly impact our
revenues and costs. The magnitude and direction of this impact primarily depends on our production
and sales volume, the proportion of our production and sales that occur in Canada, the proportion
of our tax and other financial liabilities denominated in Canadian dollars, our hedging levels, and
the magnitude, direction and duration of changes in the Canadian-U.S. dollar exchange rate.
Increases in the value of the Canadian dollar versus the U.S. dollar reduce our earnings, which are
reported in U.S. dollar terms.
We attempt to partially limit our exposure to Canadian-U.S. dollar exchange rate fluctuations
through hedging transactions. At September 30, 2005, we had $295.0 million of Canadian dollar
contracts outstanding; however, we have not entered into any new hedging agreements since the third
quarter of 2004. Under the exchange rates, hedging levels and operating conditions that existed
during the three months ended September 30, 2005, for every one-cent change in the Canadian-U.S.
dollar exchange rate, our operating income, net of hedging, for the three months ended September
30, 2005 would have been impacted by approximately $1.8 million, or approximately $7.0 million for
the full year 2005. For a description of our hedging activities, see Note 10 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in this quarterly report.
34
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Canadian Dollar Hedging Program
At September 30, 2005, we had approximately $46.6 million of unrealized gains recorded on our
Canadian dollar hedging program compared to approximately $123.0 million of unrealized gains at
December 31, 2004. This decrease resulted primarily from the expiration of hedging contracts
during 2005, as noted above. The balance of our hedging contracts
continue into the third quarter of 2006 and extend no further. These unrealized gains are classified in Unrealized gain on hedged
transactions or Other assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheet depending on the maturity date of
the hedging contract.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset
Retirement Obligations, (FIN 47). FIN 47 clarifies the term conditional as used in SFAS No.
143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. This Interpretation refers to a legal
obligation to perform an asset retirement activity even if the timing and/or settlement is
conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of an entity. Accordingly,
the entity must record a liability for the conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair
value of the obligation can be reasonably estimated. FIN 47 is effective for fiscal years ending
after December 15, 2005. We are required to adopt FIN 47 in the fourth quarter of 2005 and are
currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of FIN 47 will have on our financial position and
results of operation.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 123(R), Share-Based Payment, which requires the
measurement of all employee share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock
options, using a fair-value-based
method and the recording of such expense in our consolidated statements of income. In April 2005,
the S.E.C. announced a delay in the effective date of SFAS 123R. Therefore, the accounting
provisions of SFAS 123R are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after September 15,
2005. The pro forma disclosures previously permitted under SFAS 123 no longer will be an
alternative to financial statement recognition. We are required to adopt SFAS 123R in the first
quarter of 2006 and are currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of FASB 123R will have on
our financial position and results of operation.
In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 109-1 (FAS 109-1), Application of
FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production
Activities provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. The American Jobs Creation Act
(AJCA) introduces a special 9% tax deduction (when fully phased in) on qualified production
activities. FAS 109-1 clarifies that this tax deduction should be accounted for as a special tax
deduction in accordance with Statement 109. During the third quarter of 2005, we determined that
we would not be eligible to take the special tax deduction in 2005. Therefore, the adoption of FAS
109-1 will have no impact on our financial condition or results of operations in 2005. The range
of reasonably possible amounts of the additional deduction that are still being considered for
future periods cannot be reasonably determined at this time.
In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 109-2 (FAS 109-2), Accounting and
Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs
Creations Act of 2004. The AJCA introduces a limited time 85% dividends received deduction on the
repatriation of certain foreign earnings to a U.S. taxpayer (repatriation provision), provided
certain criteria are met. FAS109-2 provides accounting and disclosure guidance for the repatriation
provision. During the third quarter of 2005, we determined that we would not repatriate any
foreign earnings for which the provisions of FAS 109-2 would apply. Therefore, the adoption of FAS
109-2 will not impact our financial condition or result of operations.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 151, Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter
4, which clarifies the types of costs that should be expensed rather than capitalized as
inventory. This statement also clarifies the circumstances under which fixed overhead costs
associated with operating facilities involved in inventory processing should be capitalized. The
provisions of SFAS No. 151 are effective for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2005, and
we will adopt this standard in 2006. We have not yet evaluated the effect that the adoption of SFAS
151 will have on our financial position or results of operations.
35
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Foreign Exchange Risk
We have provided current disclosure concerning our Canadian dollar forward contracts, which is
included in Note 10 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this quarterly
report. For information about the effect of Canadian-U.S. dollar exchange rate fluctuations on our
manufacturing costs and Canadian dollar denominated liabilities, see the section entitled
Canadian-U.S. Dollar Exchange Rate Fluctuation Effect on Earnings.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to interest rate risk on our fixed-rate long-term debt and our short-term variable
rate bank and long-term debt. Our objective is to manage the impact of interest rate changes on
earnings and cash flows and on the market value of our borrowings. We maintain a mix of fixed rate
and variable rate borrowings. At September 30, 2005, we had $2,140.1 million of fixed rate
long-term debt and $310.5 million of short and long-term variable rate debt. The fixed rate
long-term debt is exposed to fluctuations in fair value resulting from changes in market interest
rates, but not earnings or cash flows. Our variable rate debt approximates fair value as it bears
interest rates that approximate market, but changes in interest rates do affect future earnings and
cash flows. Based on our short and long-term variable rate debt at September 30, 2005, of $310.5
million, a 100 basis point increase in interest rates would increase our quarterly interest expense
by approximately $0.8 million.
Commodity Price Risk
We purchase significant amounts of energy, chemicals, wood fiber and recovered paper to supply our
manufacturing facilities. These raw materials are market-priced commodities and, as such, are
subject to fluctuations in market prices. Increases in the prices of these commodities will tend
to reduce our reported earnings and decreases will tend to increase our reported earnings. From
time to time, we may enter into contracts aimed at securing a stable source of supply for
commodities such as timber, wood fiber, energy, chemicals and recovered paper. These contracts
typically require us to pay the market price at the time of purchase. Thus under these contracts
we generally remain subject to market fluctuations in commodity prices.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
(a) |
|
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures: |
We have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures as of September 30, 2005. Based on that evaluation, the Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing, and timely reporting information
required to be disclosed in our reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
(b) |
|
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting: |
In connection with the evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, there were no
changes during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
36
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
a. |
|
Bowater is involved in various legal proceedings relating to contracts, commercial
disputes, taxes, environmental issues, employment and workers compensation claims and other
matters. We periodically review the status of these proceedings with both inside and outside
counsel. We believe that the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition, but it could have a material adverse effect on the
results of operations in a given quarter or the year. |
b. |
|
There have been no material developments to the legal proceedings described in our
annual report on Form 10-K filed on March 16, 2005. |
c. |
|
On September 30, 2005, the Ministry of Justice of the Province of Quebec (MOJ) cited
one of our subsidiaries, Bowater Canadian Forest Products, Inc. (BCFPI), in connection with
effluent water quality of the Dolbeau mill. BCFPI is contesting the fine of CDN $387,240
levied by the MOJ. The Dolbeau mill has taken steps to improve its effluent quality and has
remained in compliance with provincial and federal effluent limits since January 1, 2005. We
expect BCFPI to reach a settlement with the MOJ in the first half of 2006. |
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibits (numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K):
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
10.1
|
|
Memorandum of Agreement between Bowater Canadian Forest Products Inc. and Bowater Maritimes
Inc. and Bowater Mersey Paper Company Limited and the Communications, Energy and Paper Workers
Union of Canada (CEP), dated June 24, 2005 |
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Statement regarding Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
37
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BOWATER INCORPORATED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ William G. Harvey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William G. Harvey |
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Michael F. Nocito |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael F. Nocito |
|
|
|
|
Vice President and Controller |
Dated: November 4, 2005
38
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
10.1
|
|
Memorandum of Agreement between Bowater Canadian Forest Products Inc. and
Bowater Maritimes Inc. and Bowater Mersey Paper Company Limited and the Communications,
Energy and Paper Workers Union of Canada (CEP), dated June 24, 2005 |
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Statement regarding Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |