Edgar Filing: FIRST CAPITAL INC

Form 10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2010

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 0-25023

FIRST CAPITAL, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Indiana

35-2056949

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)


220 Federal Drive, N.W., Corydon, Indiana		47112
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (812) 738-2198

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share		Nasdaq Global Stock Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web Site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


(Check one):	Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨

	Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates was $38.3 million, based upon the closing price of $15.00 per share as quoted on the Nasdaq Stock Market as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of March 10, 2011 was 2,787,271.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the 2010 Annual Report of Stockholders and of the Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference in Parts II and III, respectively, of this Form 10-K.

INDEX


		Page

Part I

Item 1.	Business		1
Item 1A.	Risk Factors		25
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments		28
Item 2.	Properties		29
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings		29
Item 4.	[Removed and Reserved]		29

Part II

Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities		30
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data		31
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation		33
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		42
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data		43
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure		43
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures		43
Item 9B.	Other Information		44

Part III

Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance		44
Item 11.	Executive Compensation		44
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters		44
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence		45
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services		45

Part IV

Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules		46

SIGNATURES

This report contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These statements are not historical facts, rather statements based on First Capital, Inc.’s current expectations regarding its business strategies, intended results and future performance. Forward-looking statements are preceded by terms such as “expects,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “intends” and similar expressions.

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. Management’s ability to predict results or the effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Numerous risks and uncertainties could cause or contribute to the Company’s actual results, performance and achievements to materially differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Factors which could affect actual results include, but are not limited to, interest rate trends; the general economic climate in the specific market area in which First Capital operates, as well as nationwide; First Capital’s ability to control costs and expenses; competitive products and pricing; loan delinquency rates; changes in federal and state legislation and regulation; and other factors disclosed periodically in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These factors should be considered in evaluating the forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements, whether included in this report or made elsewhere from time to time by the Company or on its behalf. Except as may be required by applicable law or regulation, First Capital assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

PART I

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS

General

First Capital, Inc. (the “Company” or “First Capital”) was incorporated under Indiana law on September 11, 1998. On December 31, 1998, the Company became the holding company for First Federal Bank, A Federal Savings Bank (the “Bank”) upon the Bank’s reorganization as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company resulting from the conversion of First Capital, Inc., M.H.C. (the “MHC”), from a federal mutual holding company to a stock holding company. On January 12, 2000, the Company completed a merger of equals with HCB Bancorp, the former holding company for Harrison County Bank, and the Bank changed its name to First Harrison Bank. On March 20, 2003, the Company acquired Hometown Bancshares, Inc. (“Hometown”), a bank holding company located in New Albany, Indiana.

The Company has no significant assets, other than all of the outstanding shares of the Bank and the portion of the net proceeds from the offering retained by the Company, and no significant liabilities. Management of the Company and the Bank are substantially similar and the Company neither owns nor leases any property, but instead uses the premises, equipment and furniture of the Bank in accordance with applicable regulations.

The Bank is regulated by the Office of Thrift Supervision and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Bank’s deposits are federally insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation under the Deposit Insurance Fund. The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank System.

Availability of Information

The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to such reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are made available free of charge on the Company’s Internet website, www.firstharrison.com, as soon as practicable after the Company electronically files such material with, or furnishes it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. The contents of the Company’s website shall not be incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K or into any reports the Company files with or furnishes to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Market Area and Competition

The Bank considers Harrison, Floyd, Clark and Washington counties in Indiana its primary market area. All of its offices are located in these four counties, which results in most of the Bank’s loans being made in these four counties. The main office of the Bank is located in Corydon, Indiana, 35 miles west of Louisville, Kentucky. The Bank aggressively competes for business with local banks, as well as large regional banks. Its most direct competition for deposit and loan business comes from the commercial banks operating in these four counties. Based on data published by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Bank is the leader among FDIC-insured institutions in deposit market share in Harrison County, the Bank’s primary county of operation.

Lending Activities

General. Over the last few years, the Bank has continued to transform the composition of its balance sheet from that of a traditional thrift institution to that of a commercial bank. On the asset side, this is being accomplished in part by selling in the secondary market the newly-originated qualified fixed-rate residential mortgage loans while retaining variable rate residential mortgage loans in the portfolio. This transformation is also enhanced by an expanded commercial lending staff dedicated to growing commercial real estate and commercial business loans. The Bank also continues to originate consumer loans and residential construction loans for the loan portfolio. The Bank does not offer, and has not offered, Alt-A, sub-prime or no-document mortgage loans.

Loan Portfolio Analysis. The following table presents the composition of the Bank’s loan portfolio by type of loan at the dates indicated.


	At December 31,
	2010						2009						2008						2007						2006
	Amount			Percent of Total			Amount			Percent of Total			Amount			Percent of Total			Amount			Percent of Total			Amount			Percent of Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Mortgage Loans:
Residential⁽¹⁾	$	130,143			43.11	%	$	139,085			43.45	%	$	150,576			45.96	%	$	161,554			47.11	%	$	173,806			50.86	%
Land		9,534			3.16			10,288			3.21			9,475			2.89			12,032			3.51			12,581			3.68
Commercial real estate		59,901			19.84			60,580			18.92			65,367			19.95			64,878			18.92			48,520			14.20
Residential construction⁽²⁾		8,151			2.70			13,862			4.33			9,577			2.92			12,963			3.78			17,435			5.10

Total mortgage loans		207,729			68.81			223,815			69.91			234,995			71.72			251,427			73.32			252,342			73.84


Consumer Loans:
Home equity and second mortgage loans		43,046			14.26			46,360			14.48			43,031			13.14			41,035			11.97			39,483			11.55
Automobile loans		19,384			6.42			17,714			5.53			16,523			5.04			15,645			4.56			15,637			4.57
Loans secured by savings accounts		1,042			0.34			1,361			0.43			1,972			0.60			2,406			0.70			2,263			0.66
Unsecured loans		3,076			1.02			2,677			0.84			2,807			0.86			2,848			0.83			2,895			0.85
Other⁽³⁾		5,732			1.90			5,321			1.66			5,419			1.65			5,349			1.56			4,406			1.29

Total consumer loans		72,280			23.94			73,433			22.94			69,752			21.29			67,283			19.62			64,684			18.92


Commercial business loans		21,911			7.25			22,861			7.15			22,881			6.99			24,210			7.06			24,730			7.24

Total gross loans		301,920			100.00	%		320,109			100.00	%		327,628			100.00	%		342,920			100.00	%		341,756			100.00	%

Less:
Due to borrowers on loans in process		3,119						4,372						2,828						6,430						6,029
Deferred loan fees net of direct costs		(222	)					(286	)					(247	)					(205	)					(168	)
Allowance for loan losses		4,473						4,931						2,662						2,232						2,320

Total loans, net	$	294,550					$	311,092					$	322,385					$	334,463					$	333,575

(1)	Includes conventional one- to four-family and multi-family residential loans.

(2)	Includes construction loans for which the Bank has committed to provide permanent financing.

(3)	Includes loans secured by lawn and farm equipment, mobile homes and other personal property.

Residential Loans. The Bank’s lending activities have concentrated on the origination of residential mortgages, both for sale in the secondary market and for retention in the Bank’s loan portfolio. Residential mortgages secured by multi-family properties are an immaterial portion of the residential loan portfolio. Substantially all residential mortgages are collateralized by properties within the Bank’s market area.

The Bank offers both fixed-rate mortgage loans and adjustable rate mortgage (“ARM”) loans typically with terms of 15 to 30 years. The Bank uses loan documents approved by the Federal National Mortgage Corporation (“Fannie Mae”) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”) whether the loan is originated for investment or sale in the secondary market.

Historically, the Bank has retained its residential loan originations in its portfolio. Retaining fixed-rate loans in its portfolio subjects the Bank to a higher degree of interest rate risk. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors–Above Average Interest Rate Risk Associated with Fixed-Rate Loans” for a further discussion of the risks of rising interest rates. Beginning in 2004, one of the Bank’s strategic goals was to expand its mortgage business by originating mortgage loans for sale, while offering a full line of mortgage products to prospective customers. This practice increases the Bank’s lending capacity and allows the Bank to more effectively manage its profitability since it is not required to predict the prepayment, credit or interest rate risks associated with retaining either the loan or the servicing asset. During 2005, the Bank hired a mortgage banking manager, charged with hiring more mortgage originators and increasing the Bank’s secondary market business in Southern Indiana. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Bank originated and funded $43.1 million of residential mortgage loans for sale in the secondary market. For a full discussion of the Bank’s mortgage banking operations, see “Item 1. Business–Mortgage Banking Activities.”

ARM loans originated have interest rates that adjust at regular intervals of one to five years, with up to 2.0% caps per adjustment period and 6.0% lifetime caps, based upon changes in the prevailing interest rates on United States Treasury Bills. The Bank also originates “hybrid” ARM loans, which are fixed for an initial period three or five years and adjust annually thereafter. The Bank may occasionally use below market interest rates and other marketing inducements to attract ARM loan borrowers. The majority of ARM loans provide that the amount of any increase or decrease in the interest rate is limited to 2.0% (upward or downward) per adjustment period and generally contains minimum and maximum interest rates. Borrower demand for ARMs versus fixed-rate mortgage loans is a function of the level of interest rates, the expectations of changes in the level of interest rates and the difference between the interest rates and loan fees offered for fixed-rate mortgage loans and interest rates and loan fees for ARM loans. The relative amount of fixed-rate and ARM loans that can be originated at any time is largely determined by the demand for each in a competitive environment.

The Bank’s lending policies generally limit the maximum loan-to-value ratio on fixed-rate and ARM loans to 80% of the lesser of the appraised value or purchase price of the underlying residential property unless private mortgage insurance to cover the excess over 80% is obtained, in which case the mortgage is limited to 95% (or 97% under a Freddie Mac program) of the lesser of appraised value or purchase price. The loan-to-value ratio, maturity and other provisions of the loans made by the Bank are generally reflected in the policy of making less than the maximum loan permissible under federal regulations, in accordance with established lending practices, market conditions and underwriting standards maintained by the Bank. The Bank requires title, fire and extended insurance coverage on all mortgage loans originated. All of the Bank’s real estate loans contain due on sale clauses. The Bank generally obtains appraisals on all its real estate loans from outside appraisers.

Construction Loans. Although the Bank originates construction loans that are repaid with the proceeds of a limited number of mortgage loans obtained by the borrower from another lender, the majority of the construction loans that the Bank originates are permanently financed in the secondary market by the Bank. Construction loans originated without a commitment by the Bank to provide permanent financing are generally originated for a term of six to 12 months and at a fixed interest rate based on the prime rate.

The Bank originates speculative construction loans to a limited number of builders operating and based in the Bank’s primary market area and with whom the Bank has well-established business relationships. At December 31, 2010, speculative construction loans, a construction loan for which there is not a

commitment for permanent financing in place at the time the construction loan was originated, amounted to $1.7 million. The Bank limits the number of speculative construction loans outstanding to any one builder based on the Bank’s assessment of the builder’s capacity to service the debt.

Most construction loans are originated with a loan-to-value ratio not to exceed 80% of the appraised estimated value of the completed property. The construction loan documents require the disbursement of the loan proceeds in increments as construction progresses. Disbursements are based on periodic on-site inspections by an independent appraiser.

Construction lending is inherently riskier than one- to four-family mortgage lending. Construction loans, on average, generally have higher loan balances than one- to four-family mortgage loans. In addition, the potential for cost overruns because of the inherent difficulties in estimating construction costs and, therefore, collateral values and the difficulties and costs associated with monitoring construction progress, among other things, are major contributing factors to this greater credit risk. Speculative construction loans have the added risk that there is not an identified buyer for the completed home when the loan is originated, with the risk that the builder will have to service the construction loan debt and finance the other carrying costs of the completed home for an extended time period until a buyer is identified. Furthermore, the demand for construction loans and the ability of construction loan borrowers to service their debt depends highly on the state of the general economy, including market interest rate levels and the state of the economy of the Bank’s primary market area. A material downturn in economic conditions could be expected to have a material adverse effect on the credit quality of the construction loan portfolio.

Commercial Real Estate Loans. Commercial real estate loans are generally secured by small retail stores, professional office space and, in certain instances, farm properties. Commercial real estate loans are generally originated with a loan-to-value ratio not to exceed 75% of the appraised value of the property. Property appraisals are performed by independent appraisers approved by the Bank’s board of directors. The Bank seeks to originate commercial real estate loans at variable interest rates based on the United States Treasury Bill rate for terms ranging from ten to 15 years and with interest rate adjustment intervals of five years. The Bank also originates fixed-rate balloon loans with a short maturity, but a longer amortization schedule.

Commercial real estate lending affords the Bank an opportunity to receive interest at rates higher than those generally available from one- to four-family residential lending. However, loans secured by such properties usually are greater in amount, more difficult to evaluate and monitor and, therefore, involve a greater degree of risk than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. Because payments on loans secured by multi-family and commercial properties are often dependent on the successful operation and management of the properties, repayment of such loans may be affected by adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy. The Bank seeks to minimize these risks by limiting the maximum loan-to-value ratio to 75% and strictly scrutinizing the financial condition of the borrower, the quality of the collateral and the management of the property securing the loan. The Bank also obtains loan guarantees from financially capable parties based on a review of personal financial statements.

Commercial Business Loans. Commercial business loans are generally secured by inventory, accounts receivable, and business equipment such as trucks and tractors. Many commercial business loans also have real estate as collateral. The Bank generally requires a personal guaranty of payment by the principals of a corporate borrower, and reviews the personal financial statements and income tax returns of the guarantors. Commercial business loans are generally originated with loan-to-value ratios not exceeding 75%.

Aside from lines of credit, commercial business loans are generally originated for terms not to exceed seven years with variable interest rates based on the prime lending rate. Approved credit lines totaled $23.8 million at December 31, 2010, of which $11.4 million was outstanding. Lines of credit are originated at fixed and variable interest rates for one-year renewable terms.

A director of the Bank is a shareholder of a farm implement dealership that contracts with the Bank to provide sales financing to the dealership’s customers. The Bank does not grant preferential credit under

this arrangement. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Bank granted approximately $753,000 of credit to customers of the dealership and such loans had an aggregate outstanding balance of $1.4 million at December 31, 2010. At December 31, 2010, 4 loans were delinquent 30 days or more with an aggregate outstanding balance of $67,000.

Commercial business lending generally involves greater risk than residential mortgage lending and involves risks that are different from those associated with residential and commercial real estate lending. Real estate lending is generally considered to be collateral-based lending with loan amounts based on predetermined loan-to-collateral values and liquidation of the underlying real estate collateral is viewed as the primary source of repayment in the event of borrower default. Although commercial business loans are often collateralized by equipment, inventory, accounts receivable or other business assets, the liquidation of collateral in the event of a borrower default is often an insufficient source of repayment because accounts receivable may be uncollectible and inventories and equipment may be obsolete or of limited use, among other things. Accordingly, the repayment of a commercial business loan depends primarily on the creditworthiness of the borrower (and any guarantors), while liquidation of collateral is a secondary, and often insufficient, source of repayment. The Bank has three commercial lenders and one commercial credit analyst committed to growing commercial business loans to facilitate the changes desired in the Bank’s balance sheet. The Bank also uses an outside loan review company to review selected commercial credits on a semi-annual basis.

Consumer Loans. The Bank offers a variety of secured or guaranteed consumer loans, including automobile and truck loans, home equity loans, home improvement loans, boat loans, mobile home loans and loans secured by savings deposits. In addition, the Bank offers unsecured consumer loans. Consumer loans are generally originated at fixed interest rates and for terms not to exceed seven years. The largest portion of the Bank’s consumer loan portfolio consists of home equity and second mortgage loans followed by automobile and truck loans. Automobile and truck loans are originated on both new and used vehicles. Such loans are generally originated at fixed interest rates for terms up to five years and at loan-to-value ratios up to 90% of the blue book value in the case of used vehicles and 90% of the purchase price in the case of new vehicles.

The Bank originates variable-rate home equity and fixed-rate second mortgage loans generally for terms not to exceed five years. The loan-to-value ratio on such loans is limited to 80%, taking into account the outstanding balance on the first mortgage loan.

The Bank’s underwriting procedures for consumer loans includes an assessment of the applicant’s payment history on other debts and ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loans. Although the applicant’s creditworthiness is a primary consideration, the underwriting process also includes a comparison of the value of the security, if any, to the proposed loan amount. The Bank underwrites and originates the majority of its consumer loans internally, which management believes limits exposure to credit risks relating to loans underwritten or purchased from brokers or other outside sources.

Consumer loans generally entail greater risk than do residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of consumer loans which are unsecured or secured by assets that depreciate rapidly, such as automobiles. In the latter case, repossessed collateral for a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment for the outstanding loan and the remaining deficiency often does not warrant further substantial collection efforts against the borrower. In addition, consumer loan collections depend on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and, therefore, are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount which can be recovered on such loans. Such loans may also give rise to claims and defenses by the borrower against the Bank as the holder of the loan, and a borrower may be able to assert claims and defenses that it has against the seller of the underlying collateral.

Loan Maturity and Repricing

The following table sets forth certain information at December 31, 2010 regarding the dollar amount of loans maturing in the Bank’s portfolio based on their contractual terms to maturity, but does not include potential prepayments. Demand loans, which are loans having neither a stated schedule of repayments nor a stated maturity, and overdrafts are reported as due in one year or less. Loan balances do not include undisbursed loan proceeds, unearned income and allowance for loan losses.


	Within One Year		After One Year Through 3 Years		After 3 Years Through 5 Years		After 5 Years Through 10 Years		After 10 Years Through 15 Years		After 15 Years		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Mortgage loans:
Residential	$	8,081	$	15,104	$	15,702	$	28,387	$	21,651	$	41,218	$	130,143
Commercial real estate and land loans		13,766		9,465		12,648		15,132		9,894		8,530		69,435
Residential construction⁽¹⁾		6,923		1,217		11		—		—		—		8,151
Consumer loans		16,233		29,229		21,866		3,957		100		895		72,280
Commercial business		9,054		7,653		2,905		1,894		360		45		21,911

Total gross loans	$	54,057	$	62,668	$	53,132	$	49,370	$	32,005	$	50,688	$	301,920

(1)	Includes construction loans for which the Bank has committed to provide permanent financing.

The following table sets forth the dollar amount of all loans due after December 31, 2011, which have fixed interest rates and floating or adjustable interest rates.


	Fixed Rates		Floating or Adjustable Rates
	(Dollars in thousands)
Mortgage loans:
Residential	$	65,643	$	56,419
Commercial real estate and land loans		18,534		37,135
Residential construction		28		1,200
Consumer loans		28,834		27,213
Commercial business		7,081		5,776

Total gross loans	$	120,120	$	127,743

Loan Solicitation and Processing. A majority of the Bank’s loan originations are made to existing customers. Walk-ins and customer referrals are also a source of loan originations. Upon receipt of a loan application, a credit report is ordered to verify specific information relating to the loan applicant’s employment, income and credit standing. A loan applicant’s income is verified through the applicant’s employer or from the applicant’s tax returns. In the case of a real estate loan, an appraisal of the real estate intended to secure the proposed loan is undertaken, generally by an independent appraiser approved by the Bank. The mortgage loan documents used by the Bank conform to secondary market standards.

The Bank requires that borrowers obtain certain types of insurance to protect its interest in the collateral securing the loan. The Bank requires either a title insurance policy insuring that the Bank has a valid first lien on the mortgaged real estate or an opinion by an attorney regarding the validity of title. Fire and casualty insurance is also required on collateral for loans.

Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit. The Bank issues commitments for fixed- and adjustable-rate single-family residential mortgage loans conditioned upon the occurrence of certain events. Such commitments are made in writing on specified terms and conditions and are honored for up to 60 days from the date of application, depending on the type of transaction. The Bank had outstanding loan commitments of approximately $7.3 million at December 31, 2010.

As an accommodation to its commercial business loan borrowers, the Bank issues standby letters of credit or performance bonds usually in favor of municipalities for whom its borrowers are performing services. At December 31, 2010, the Bank had outstanding letters of credit of $1.7 million.

Loan Origination and Other Fees. Loan fees and points are a percentage of the principal amount of the mortgage loan that is charged to the borrower for funding the loan. The Bank usually charges a fixed origination fee on one- to four-family residential real estate loans and long-term commercial real estate loans. Current accounting standards require loan origination fees and certain direct costs of underwriting and closing loans to be deferred and amortized into interest income over the contractual life of the loan. Deferred fees and costs associated with loans that are sold are recognized as income at the time of sale. The Bank had $222,000 of net deferred loan costs at December 31, 2010.

Mortgage Banking Activities. Mortgage loans originated and funded by the Bank and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or market value. Aggregate market value is determined based on the quoted prices under a “best efforts” sales agreement with a third party. Net unrealized losses are recognized through a valuation allowance by charges to income. Realized gains on sales of mortgage loans are included in noninterest income.

Commitments to originate and fund mortgage loans for sale in the secondary market are considered derivative financial instruments to be accounted for at fair value. The Bank’s mortgage loan commitments subject to derivative accounting are fixed rate mortgage commitments at market rates when initiated. At December 31, 2010, the Bank had commitments to originate $670,000 in fixed-rate mortgage loans intended for sale in the secondary market after the loans are closed. Fair value is estimated based on fees that would be charged on commitments with similar terms.

Delinquencies. The Bank’s collection procedures provide for a series of contacts with delinquent borrowers. A late charge is assessed and a late charge notice is sent to the borrower after the 15th day of delinquency. After 20 days, the collector places a phone call to the borrower. When a payment becomes 60 days past due, the collector issues a default letter. If a loan continues in a delinquent status for 90 days or more, the Bank generally initiates foreclosure or other litigation proceedings.

Nonperforming Assets. Loans are reviewed regularly and when loans become 90 days delinquent, the loan is placed on nonaccrual status and the previously accrued interest income is reversed unless, in the opinion of management, the outstanding interest remains collectible. Typically, payments received on a nonaccrual loan are applied to the outstanding principal and interest as determined at the time of collection of the loan when the likelihood of further loss on the loan is remote. Otherwise, the Bank applies the cost recovery method and applies all payments as a reduction of the unpaid principal balance.

The following table sets forth information with respect to the Bank’s nonperforming assets for the dates indicated. Included in nonperforming loans are loans for which the Bank has modified the repayment terms, and therefore are considered to be troubled debt restructurings as described below. At December 31, 2010, troubled debt restructurings totaling $3.9 million and all troubled debt restructurings were on nonaccrual status at December 31, 2010. The Bank had no troubled debt restructurings classified as performing loans for the periods presented in the table below.


	At December 31,
	2010			2009			2008			2007			2006
	(Dollars in thousands)
Loans accounted for on a nonaccrual basis:
Residential real estate	$	3,230		$	2,295		$	2,013		$	1,684		$	797
Commercial real estate		1,780			3,445			2,088			2,674			2,192
Commercial business		2,148			2,238			82			397			48
Consumer		390			456			258			124			208

Total		7,548			8,434			4,441			4,879			3,245


Accruing loans past due 90 days or more:
Residential real estate		334			563			735			633			776
Commercial real estate		—			202			27			—			—
Commercial business		20			—			—			23			144
Consumer		25			317			330			160			205

Total		379			1,082			1,092			816			1,125


Foreclosed real estate, net		591			877			881			833			941


Total nonperforming assets	$	8,518		$	10,393		$	6,414		$	6,528		$	5,311


Total loans delinquent 90 days or more to net loans		2.69	%		3.06	%		1.72	%		1.70	%		1.31	%

Total loans delinquent 90 days or more to total assets		1.75	%		2.09	%		1.21	%		1.26	%		0.96	%

Total nonperforming assets to total assets		1.88	%		2.28	%		1.40	%		1.44	%		1.16	%

The Bank accrues interest on loans over 90 days past due when, in the opinion of management, the estimated value of collateral and collection efforts are deemed sufficient to ensure full recovery. The Bank recognized $16,000 in interest income on nonperforming loans for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. The Bank would have recorded interest income of $413,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010 had nonaccrual loans and troubled debt restructurings had been current in accordance with their original terms.

Restructured Loans. Periodically, the Bank modifies loans to extend the term or make other concessions to help borrowers stay current on their loans and avoid foreclosure. The Bank does not forgive principal or interest on loans or modify interest rates to rates that are below market rates. These modified loans are also referred to as “troubled debt restructurings.” At December 31, 2010, modified loans totaled $3.9 million.

Classified Assets. The Office of Thrift Supervision has adopted various regulations regarding problem assets of savings institutions. The regulations require that each insured institution review and classify its assets on a regular basis. In addition, in connection with examinations of insured institutions, Office of Thrift Supervision examiners have the authority to identify problem assets and, if appropriate, require them to be classified. There are three classifications for problem assets: substandard, doubtful and loss. “Substandard” assets have one or more defined weaknesses and are characterized by the distinct possibility that the insured institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. “Doubtful” assets have the weaknesses of substandard assets with the additional characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values questionable, and there is a high possibility of loss. An asset classified as “loss” is considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as an asset of the institution is not warranted. If an asset or portion thereof is classified as loss, the insured institution establishes specific allowances for loan losses for the full amount of the portion of the asset classified as loss. All or a portion of general loan loss allowances established to cover possible losses related to assets classified substandard or doubtful can be included in determining an institution’s regulatory capital,

while specific valuation allowances for loan losses generally do not qualify as regulatory capital.

The Company holds a corporate collateralized mortgage obligation security that was downgraded to a substandard regulatory classification in 2009 due to a downgrade of the security’s credit quality rating by various rating agencies. At December 31, 2010, the amortized cost and fair value of this security was $711,000 and $668,000, respectively. The Company has evaluated the existence of a potential credit loss component related to the decline in fair value and based upon an independent third party analysis performed in December 2010, the Company expects to collect the contractual principal and interest cash flows for this security. As a result, no other-than-temporary impairment has been recognized for this security as of December 31, 2010. The Company will continue to monitor credit quality and receive the independent third-party analysis of the security on a quarterly basis. While management does not anticipate a credit-related impairment loss for this security at December 31, 2010, additional deterioration in market and economic conditions may have a material adverse impact on the credit quality of this security in the future.

At December 31, 2010, the Bank had $7.5 million in doubtful loans and $7.1 million in substandard loans, of which all but $6.7 million are included in total nonperforming loans disclosed in the above table. The Bank also had one investment security classified as substandard at December 31, 2010, with a market value of $668,000 as discussed above. In addition to regulatory classifications, the Bank also classifies loans as “special mention” or “watch” when they are currently performing in accordance with their contractual terms but exhibit potential weaknesses that must be monitored by management on an ongoing basis. At December 31, 2010, the Bank identified $9.6 million in loans as special mention or watch loans.

Current accounting rules require that impaired loans be measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or if expedient, at the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. A loan is classified as “impaired” by management when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement. If the fair value, as measured by one of these methods, is less than the recorded investment in the impaired loan, the Bank establishes a valuation allowance with a provision charged to expense. Management reviews the valuation of impaired loans on a quarterly basis to consider changes due to the passage of time or revised estimates. Assets that do not expose the Bank to risk sufficient to warrant classification in one of the aforementioned categories, but which possess some weaknesses, are required to be designated “special mention” by management.

An insured institution is required to establish and maintain an allowance for loan losses at a level that is adequate to absorb estimated credit losses associated with the loan portfolio, including binding commitments to lend. General allowances represent loss allowances which have been established to recognize the inherent risk associated with lending activities. When an insured institution classifies problem assets as “loss,” it is required either to establish an allowance for losses equal to 100% of the amount of the assets, or charge off the classified asset. The amount of its valuation allowance is subject to review by the Office of Thrift Supervision, which can order the establishment of additional general loss allowances. The Bank regularly reviews the loan portfolio to determine whether any loans require classification in accordance with applicable regulations.

At December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the aggregate amounts of the Bank’s classified assets were as follows:


	At December 31,
	2010		2009		2008
	(Dollars in thousands)
Classified assets:
Loss	$	—	$	—	$	—
Doubtful		7,548		8,434		4,441
Substandard		7,788		6,718		9,148
Special mention		9,554		9,322		7,689

Loans classified as impaired in accordance with accounting standards included in the above regulatory classifications and the related allowance for loan losses are summarized below at the dates indicated:


	At December 31,
	2010		2009		2008
	(Dollars in thousands)
Impaired loans with related allowance	$	1,497	$	6,894	$	3,201
Impaired loans with no allowance		6,430		2,622		2,332

Total impaired loans	$	7,927	$	9,516	$	5,533


Allowance for loan losses:
Related to impaired loans	$	2,492	$	3,188	$	719
Related to other loans		1,981		1,743		1,943

Foreclosed Real Estate. Foreclosed real estate held for sale is carried at fair value minus estimated costs to sell. Costs of holding foreclosed real estate are charged to expense in the current period, except for significant property improvements, which are capitalized. Valuations are periodically performed by management and an allowance is established by a charge to non-interest expense if the carrying value exceeds the fair value minus estimated costs to sell. The net income from operations of foreclosed real estate held for sale is reported in non-interest income. At December 31, 2010, the Bank had foreclosed real estate totaling $591,000.

Allowance for Loan Losses. Loans are the Bank’s largest concentration of assets and continue to represent the most significant potential risk. In originating loans, the Bank recognizes that losses will be experienced and that the risk of loss will vary with, among other things, the type of loan made, the creditworthiness of the borrower over the term of the loan, general economic conditions and, in the case of a secured loan, the quality of the collateral. The Bank maintains an allowance for loan losses to absorb losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of probable loan losses based on information available as of the date of the financial statements. The allowance for loan losses is based on management’s evaluation of the loan portfolio, including historical loan loss experience, delinquencies, known and inherent risks in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, information about specific borrower situations, estimated collateral values, and economic conditions.

The loan portfolio is reviewed quarterly by management to evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses to determine the amount of any adjustment required after considering the loan charge-offs and recoveries for the quarter. Management applies a systematic methodology that incorporates its current judgments about the credit quality of the loan portfolio. In addition, the Office of Thrift Supervision, as an integral part of its examination process, periodically reviews the Bank’s allowance for loan losses and may require the Bank to make additional provisions for estimated losses based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.

The methodology used in determining the allowance for loan losses includes segmenting the loan portfolio by identifying risk characteristics common to pools of loans, determining and measuring impairment of individual loans based on the present value of expected future cash flows or the fair value of collateral, and determining and measuring impairment for pools of loans with similar characteristics by applying loss factors that consider the qualitative factors which may affect the loss rates.

Specific allowances related to impaired loans and other classified loans are established where management has identified significant conditions or circumstances related to a loan that management believes indicate that a probable loss has been incurred. The identification of these loans results from the loan review process that identifies and monitors credits with weaknesses or conditions which call into question the full collection of the contractual payments due under the terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due.

For loans evaluated on a pool basis, management applies loss factors to pools of loans with common risk characteristics (i.e., residential mortgage loans, home equity loans, credit card loans). The loss factors are derived from the Bank’s historical loss experience or, where the Bank does not have loss experience, the peer group historical loss experience. Peer group historical loss experience is used after evaluating the attributes of the Bank’s loan portfolio as compared to the peer group which is considered to be community banks located in the central region of the United States. Loss factors are adjusted for significant qualitative factors that, in management’s judgment, affect the collectability of the loan portfolio segment. The significant qualitative factors include the levels and trends in charge-offs and recoveries, trends in volume and terms of loans, levels and trends in delinquencies, the effects of changes in underwriting standards and other lending practices or procedures, the experience and depth of the lending management and staff, effects of changes in credit concentration, changes in industry and market conditions and national and local economic trends and conditions. Management evaluates these conditions on a quarterly basis and evaluates and modifies the assumptions used in establishing the loss factors.

The following table sets forth an analysis of the Bank’s allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated.


	Year Ended December 31,
	2010			2009			2008			2007			2006
Allowance at beginning of period	$	4,931		$	2,662		$	2,232		$	2,320		$	2,104
Provision for loan losses		2,037			4,289			1,570			558			810

		6,968			6,951			3,802			2,878			2,914


Recoveries:
Residential real estate		9			26			4			2			14
Commercial real estate		4			6			—			—			—
Commercial business		9			14			13			13			4
Consumer		214			209			179			121			92

Total recoveries		236			255			196			136			110


Charge-offs:
Residential real estate		620			425			357			216			87
Commercial real estate		1,326			920			96			36			57
Commercial business		29			181			210			77			115
Consumer		756			749			673			453			445

Total charge-offs		2,731			2,275			1,336			782			704

Net (charge-offs) recoveries		(2,495	)		(2,020	)		(1,140	)		(646	)		(594	)

Balance at end of period	$	4,473		$	4,931		$	2,662		$	2,232		$	2,320


Ratio of allowance to total loans outstanding at the end of the period		1.48	%		1.54	%		0.81	%		0.65	%		0.68	%

Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans outstanding during the period		0.80	%		0.63	%		0.35	%		0.19	%		0.18	%

Allowance for Loan Losses Analysis

The following table sets forth the breakdown of the allowance for loan losses by loan category at the dates indicated.


	At December 31,
	2010					2009					2008					2007					2006
	Amount		Percent of Outstanding Loans in Category			Amount		Percent of Outstanding Loans in Category			Amount		Percent of Outstanding Loans in Category			Amount		Percent of Outstanding Loans in Category			Amount		Percent of Outstanding Loans in Category
	(Dollars in thousands)
Residential real estate⁽¹⁾	$	1,045		45.81	%	$	1,297		47.78	%	$	608		48.88	%	$	440		50.89	%	$	539		55.96	%
Commercial real estate and land loans		1,106		23.00			1,772		22.13			737		22.84			764		22.43			697		17.88
Commercial business		1,251		7.25			1,264		7.15			240		6.99			200		7.06			209		7.24
Consumer		1,071		23.94			598		22.94			1,077		21.29			828		19.62			875		18.92

Total allowance for loan losses	$	4,473		100.00	%	$	4,931		100.00	%	$	2,662		100.00	%	$	2,232		100.00	%	$	2,320		100.00	%

(1)	Includes residential construction loans.

Investment Activities

Federally chartered savings institutions have authority to invest in various types of liquid assets, including United States Treasury obligations, securities of various federal agencies and of state and municipal governments, deposits at the applicable Federal Home Loan Bank, certificates of deposit of federally insured institutions, certain bankers’ acceptances and federal funds. Subject to various restrictions, such savings institutions may also invest a portion of their assets in commercial paper, corporate debt securities and mutual funds, the assets of which conform to the investments that federally chartered savings institutions are otherwise authorized to make directly. Savings institutions are also required to maintain minimum levels of liquid assets that vary from time to time. The Bank may decide to increase its liquidity above the required levels depending upon the availability of funds and comparative yields on investments in relation to return on loans.

The Bank is required under federal regulations to maintain a minimum amount of liquid assets and is also permitted to make certain other securities investments. The balance of the Bank’s investments in short-term securities in excess of regulatory requirements reflects management’s response to the significantly increasing percentage of deposits with short maturities. Management intends to hold securities with short maturities in the Bank’s investment portfolio in order to enable the Bank to match more closely the interest-rate sensitivities of its assets and liabilities.

The Bank periodically invests in mortgage-backed securities, including mortgage-backed securities guaranteed or insured by Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. Mortgage-backed securities generally increase the quality of the Bank’s assets by virtue of the guarantees that back them, are more liquid than individual mortgage loans and may be used to collateralize borrowings or other obligations of the Bank. Of the Bank’s total mortgage-backed securities portfolio at December 31, 2010, securities with a market value of $704,000 have adjustable rates as of that date.

The Bank also invests in collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) issued by Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, as well as private issuers. CMOs are complex mortgage-backed securities that restructure the cash flows and risks of the underlying mortgage collateral.

At December 31, 2010, neither the Company nor the Bank had an investment in securities (other than United States Government and agency securities), which exceeded 10% of the Company’s consolidated stockholders’ equity at that date.

The following table sets forth the securities portfolio at the dates indicated.


	At December 31,
	2010										2009										2008
	Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Percent of Portfolio			Weighted Average Yield⁽¹⁾			Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Percent of Portfolio			Weighted Average Yield⁽¹⁾			Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Percent of Portfolio			Weighted Average Yield⁽¹⁾
	(Dollars in thousands)
Securities Held to Maturity⁽²⁾
Municipal:
Due in one year or less	$	14	$	14		0.01	%		10.23	%	$	22	$	21		0.02	%		10.23	%	$	21	$	20		0.03	%		10.23	%
Due after one year through five years		—		—		—			—			15		14		0.02			10.23	%		37		35		0.04			10.23	%
Due after five years through ten years		—		—		—			—			—		—		—			—			—		—		—			—
Due after ten years		—		—		—			—			—		—		—			—			—		—		—			—
Mortgage-backed securities⁽³⁾		18		18		0.02			2.64	%		27		27		0.03			3.36	%		31		31		0.04			4.08	%

	$	32	$	32		0.03	%				$	64	$	62		0.07	%				$	89	$	86		0.11	%


Securities Available for Sale
Debt securities:
U.S. agency:
Due in one year or less	$	—	$	—		—			—		$	7,389	$	7,301		7.85	%		3.04	%	$	4,055	$	4,000		4.86	%		3.89	%
Due after one year through five years		13,161		13,056		13.02	%		1.94	%		11,861		11,789		12.67			2.62	%		16,798		16,572		20.12			3.39	%
Due after five years through ten years		7,071		7,023		7.00			2.14	%		11,655		11,741		12.62			3.35	%		4,606		4,545		5.52			4.32	%
Due after ten years through fifteen years		22,148		22,321		22.26			2.09	%		5,704		5,734		6.16			3.03	%		—		—		—			—

Mortgage-backed securities and CMOs ⁽³⁾		26,301		25,776		25.70			3.33	%		25,847		25,428		27.34			4.65	%		31,892		31,578		38.32			4.76	%

Municipal:
Due in one year or less		1,529		1,518		1.51			4.25	%		2,785		2,761		2.97			4.73	%		1,481		1,476		1.79			4.54	%
Due after one year through five years		3,873		3,775		3.77			5.13	%		5,692		5,549		5.97			4.96	%		6,585		6,467		7.85			5.28	%
Due after five years through ten years		5,288		5,208		5.19			5.44	%		4,958		4,874		5.24			5.68	%		4,589		4,558		5.53			5.73	%
Due after ten years		18,766		18,865		18.82			5.81	%		15,057		14,982		16.11			5.94	%		11,223		11,460		13.91			5.83	%

Equity securities:
Mutual funds		2,714		2,705		2.70			N/A			2,781		2,794		3.00			N/A			1,504		1,637		1.99			N/A

	$	100,851	$	100,247		99.97	%				$	93,729	$	92,953		99.93	%				$	82,733	$	82,293		99.89	%

(1)	Yields are calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis using a marginal federal income tax rate of 34%. Weighted average yields are calculated using average prepayment rates for the most recent three-month period.

(2)	Securities held to maturity are carried at amortized cost.

(3)	The expected maturities of mortgage-backed securities and CMOs may differ from contractual maturities because the mortgages underlying the obligations may be prepaid without penalty.

Deposit Activities and Other Sources of Funds

General. Deposits and loan repayments are the major source of the Bank’s funds for lending and investment activities and for its general business purposes. Loan repayments are a relatively stable source of funds, while deposit inflows and outflows and loan prepayments are significantly influenced by general interest rates and money market conditions. Borrowing may be used on a short-term basis to compensate for reductions in the availability of funds from other sources or may also be used on a longer-term basis for interest rate risk management.

Deposit Accounts. Deposits are attracted from within the Bank’s primary market area through the offering of a broad selection of deposit instruments, including non-interest bearing checking accounts, negotiable order of withdrawal (“NOW”) accounts, money market accounts, regular savings accounts, certificates of deposit and retirement savings plans. Deposit account terms vary, according to the minimum balance required, the time periods the funds must remain on deposit and the interest rate, among other factors. In determining the terms of its deposit accounts, the Bank considers the rates offered by its competition, profitability to the Bank, matching deposit and loan products and its customer preferences and concerns. The Bank generally reviews its deposit mix and pricing weekly.

The following table presents the maturity distributions of time deposits of $100,000 or more as of December 31, 2010.


	Amount at December 31, 2010
Maturity Period	(Dollars in thousands)
Three months or less	$	3,998
Over three through six months		4,877
Over six through 12 months		10,931
Over 12 months		14,659

Total	$	34,465

The following table sets forth the balances of deposits in the various types of accounts offered by the Bank at the dates indicated.


	At December 31,
	2010								2009								2008
	Amount		Percent of Total			Increase/ (Decrease)			Amount		Percent of Total			Increase/ (Decrease)			Amount		Percent of Total			Increase/ (Decrease)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Non-interest bearing demand	$	40,774		10.79	%	$	301		$	40,473		10.81	%	$	3,705		$	36,768		10.33	%	$	1,476
NOW accounts		154,385		40.84			21,133			133,252		35.58			23,960			109,292		30.71			38,718
Savings accounts		43,488		11.50			1,966			41,522		11.09			5,155			36,367		10.22			7,285
Money market accounts		13,559		3.59			(671	)		14,230		3.80			(3,213	)		17,443		4.90			(8,919	)
Fixed rate time deposits which mature:
Within one year		81,214		21.48			(4,650	)		85,864		22.93			(15,418	)		101,282		28.46			(10,415	)
After one year, but within three years		36,523		9.66			(12,760	)		49,283		13.16			7,319			41,964		11.79			(5,986	)
After three years, but within five years		7,939		2.10			(1,652	)		9,591		2.56			(2,478	)		12,069		3.39			5,586
After five years		58		0.02			(137	)		195		0.05			(449	)		644		0.18			(7	)
Club accounts		63		0.02			(3	)		66		0.02			4			62		0.02			2

Total	$	378,003		100.00	%	$	3,527		$	374,476		100.00	%	$	18,585		$	355,891		100.00	%	$	27,740

The following table sets forth the amount and maturities of time deposits by rates at December 31, 2010.


	Amount Due
	Less Than One Year		1 - 3 Years		3 - 5 Years		After 5 Years		Total		Percent of Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
0.00% — 0.99%	$	25,265	$	142	$	—	$	—	$	25,407		20.21	%
1.00% — 1.99%		20,696		15,229		3,784		—		39,709		31.58
2.00% — 2.99%		16,565		10,575		3,852		—		30,992		24.65
3.00% — 3.99%		13,462		3,973		45		—		17,480		13.90
4.00% — 4.99%		4,799		6,526		136		58		11,519		9.16
5.00% — 5.99%		426		78		122		—		626		0.50
6.00% — 6.99%		—		—		—		—		—		0.00
7.00% — 7.99%		—		—		—		—		—		0.00
8.00% — 8.99%		1		—		—		—		1		0.00

Total	$	81,214	$	36,523	$	7,939	$	58	$	125,734		100.00	%

Borrowings. The Bank has at times relied upon advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis to supplement its supply of lendable funds and to meet deposit withdrawal requirements. Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis are secured by certain first mortgage loans and investment and mortgage-backed securities. The Bank also uses retail repurchase agreements as a source of borrowings.

The Federal Home Loan Bank functions as a central reserve bank providing credit for savings and loan associations and certain other member financial institutions. As a member, the Bank is required to own capital stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank and is authorized to apply for advances on the security of such stock and certain of its mortgage loans and other assets (principally securities which are obligations of, or guaranteed by, the United States) provided certain standards related to creditworthiness have been met. Advances are made pursuant to several different programs. Each credit program has its own interest rate and range of maturities. Depending on the program, limitations on the amount of advances are based either on a fixed percentage of an institution’s net worth or on the Federal Home Loan Bank’s assessment of the institution’s creditworthiness. Under its current credit policies, the Federal Home Loan Bank generally limits advances to 20% of a member’s assets, and short-term borrowing of less than one year may not exceed 10% of the institution’s assets. The Federal Home Loan Bank determines specific lines of credit for each member institution.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Bank’s use of Federal Home Loan Bank advances.


	At or For the Years Ended December 31,
	2010			2009			2008
	(Dollars in thousands)
Maximum balance at any month end	$	29,001		$	45,430		$	60,294

Average balance		23,116			40,500			53,639

Period end balance		15,729			24,776			47,830

Weighted average interest rate:
At end of period		4.05	%		4.32	%		4.68	%

During the period		4.37	%		5.54	%		4.78	%

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Bank’s use of retail repurchase agreements.


	At or For the Years Ended December 31,
	2010			2009			2008
	(Dollars in thousands)
Maximum balance at any month end	$	9,223		$	7,949		$	17,698

Average balance		8,142			5,428			11,759

Period end balance		8,669			7,949			4,552

Weighted average interest rate:
At end of period		0.76	%		0.91	%		1.00	%

During the period		0.90	%		0.94	%		2.11	%

Subsidiary Activities

The Bank is the Company’s only subsidiary, and is wholly-owned by the Company. First Harrison Investments, Inc. and First Harrison Holdings, Inc. are wholly-owned Nevada corporate subsidiaries of the Bank that jointly own First Harrison, LLC, a Nevada limited liability corporation that holds and manages an investment securities portfolio. First Harrison REIT, Inc. was incorporated on July 3, 2008 to hold a portion of the Bank’s real estate mortgage loan portfolio. First Harrison REIT, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of First Harrison Holdings, Inc.

Personnel

As of December 31, 2010, the Bank had 118 full-time employees and 31 part-time employees. A collective bargaining unit does not represent the employees and the Bank considers its relationship with its employees to be good.

REGULATION AND SUPERVISION

General

As a savings and loan holding company, the Company is required by federal law to report to, and otherwise comply with the rules and regulations of, the Office of Thrift Supervision. The Bank, an insured federal savings association, is subject to extensive regulation, examination and supervision by the Office of Thrift Supervision, as its primary federal regulator, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as the deposit insurer.

The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank System and, with respect to deposit insurance, of the Deposit Insurance Fund managed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Bank must file reports with the Office of Thrift Supervision and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation concerning its activities and financial condition and obtain regulatory approvals before entering into certain transactions such as mergers with, or acquisitions of, other savings associations. The Office of Thrift Supervision and/or the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation conduct periodic examinations to test the Bank’s safety and soundness and compliance with various regulatory requirements. This regulation and supervision establishes a comprehensive framework of activities in which an institution can engage and is intended primarily for the protection of the insurance fund and depositors. The regulatory structure also gives the regulatory authorities extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies with respect to the classification of assets and the establishment of adequate loan loss reserves for regulatory purposes. Any change in such regulatory requirements and policies, whether by the Office of Thrift Supervision, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or Congress, could have a material adverse impact on the Company, the Bank and their operations.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), signed by the President on July 21, 2010, provides for the regulation and supervision of federal savings institutions like the Bank to be transferred from the Office of Thrift Supervision to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the agency that regulates national banks. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency will assume primary responsibility for

examining the Bank and implementing and enforcing many of the laws and regulations applicable to federal savings institutions. The Office of Thrift Supervision will be eliminated. The transfer will occur one year from July 21, 2010 enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act, subject to a possible six month extension. At the same time, the responsibility for supervising and regulating savings and loan holding companies will be transferred to the Federal Reserve Board, which currently supervises bank holding companies. The Dodd-Frank Act also provides for the creation of a new agency, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, as an independent bureau of the Federal Reserve Board, to take over the implementation of federal consumer financial protection and fair lending laws from the depository institution regulators. However, institutions of $10 billion or fewer in assets will continue to be examined for compliance with such laws and regulations by, and subject to the primary enforcement authority of, the prudential regulator rather than the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Certain regulatory requirements applicable to the Bank and to the Company are referred to below or elsewhere herein. The summary of statutory provisions and regulations applicable to savings associations and their holding companies set forth below and elsewhere in this document does not purport to be a complete description of such statutes and regulations and their effects on the Bank and the Company and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the actual laws and regulations.

Holding Company Regulation

General. The Company is a unitary savings and loan holding company within the meaning of federal law. As such, the Company is registered with the Office of Thrift Supervision and subject to Office of Thrift Supervision regulations, examination, supervision and reporting requirements. In addition, the Office of Thrift Supervision has enforcement authorities over the Company and its non-savings association subsidiaries. Among other things, that authority permits the OTS to restrict or prohibit activities that one determined to be a serious risk to the subsidiary savings association.

The Dodd-Frank Act regulatory restructuring transfers to the Federal Reserve Board the responsibility for regulating and supervising savings and loan holding companies. That will occur one year from the July 21, 2010 effective date of the Dodd-Frank Act, subject to a possible six month extension.

Activities Restrictions. Upon any non-supervisory acquisition by the Company of another savings association or savings bank that meets the qualified thrift lender test and is deemed to be a savings association by the Office of Thrift Supervision, the Company would become a multiple savings and loan holding company (if the acquired institution is held as a separate subsidiary) and would generally be limited to activities permissible for bank holding companies under Section 4(c) of the Bank Holding Company Act, subject to the prior approval of the Office of Thrift Supervision, and certain activities authorized by Office of Thrift Supervision regulation. The Dodd-Frank Act added that any savings and loan holding company that engages in activities permissible for a financial holding company must meet the qualitative requirements for a bank holding company to be a financial holding company and conducts the activities in accordance with the requirements that would apply to a financial holding company’s conduct of the activity.

A savings and loan holding company is prohibited from, directly or indirectly, acquiring more than 5% of the voting stock of another savings association or savings and loan holding company, without prior written approval of the Office of Thrift Supervision and from acquiring or retaining control of a depository institution that is not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. In evaluating applications by holding companies to acquire savings associations, the Office of Thrift Supervision considers, among other things, factors such as the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of the Company and institution involved, the effect of the acquisition on the risk to the deposit insurance funds, the convenience and needs of the community and competitive effects.

The Office of Thrift Supervision may not approve any acquisition that would result in a multiple savings and loan holding company controlling savings associations in more than one state, subject to two exceptions: (i) the approval of interstate supervisory acquisitions by savings and loan holding companies; and (ii) the acquisition of a savings association in another state if the laws of the state of the target savings association specifically permit such acquisitions. The states vary in the extent to which they permit interstate savings and loan holding company acquisitions.

Capital. Savings and loan holding companies are not currently subject to specific regulatory capital requirements. The Dodd-Frank Act, however, requires the Federal Reserve Board to promulgate consolidated capital requirements for depository institution holding companies that are no less stringent, both quantitatively and in terms of components of capital, than those applicable to institutions themselves. Instruments such as cumulative preferred stock and trust preferred securities will no longer be includable as Tier 1 capital as is currently the case with bank holding companies. Instruments issued by May 19, 2010 will be grandfathered for companies with consolidated assets of $15 billion or less. There is a five-year transition period (from the July 21, 2010 effective date of the Dodd-Frank Act) before the capital requirements will apply to savings and loan holding companies.

Source of Strength. The Dodd-Frank Act also extends the “source of strength” doctrine to savings and loan holding companies. The regulatory agencies must issue regulations requiring that all bank and savings and loan holding companies serve as a source of strength to their subsidiary depository institutions by providing capital, liquidity and other support in times of financial stress.

Dividends. The Bank must notify the Office of Thrift Supervision thirty (30) days before declaring any dividend to the Company. The financial impact of a holding company on its subsidiary institution is a matter that is evaluated by the Office of Thrift Supervision and the agency has authority to order cessation of activities or divestiture of subsidiaries deemed to pose a threat to the safety and soundness of the institution.

Acquisition of the Company. Under the Federal Change in Control Act, a notice must be submitted to the Office of Thrift Supervision if any person (including a company), or group acting in concert, seeks to acquire direct or indirect “control” of a savings and loan holding company or savings association. Under certain circumstances, a change of control may occur, and prior notice is required, upon the acquisition of 10% or more of the Company’s outstanding voting stock, unless the Office of Thrift Supervision has found that the acquisition will not result in control of the Company. A change in control definitively occurs upon the acquisition of 25% or more of the Company’s outstanding voting stock. Under the Change in Control Act, the Office of Thrift Supervision generally has 60 days from the filing of a complete notice to act, taking into consideration certain factors, including the financial and managerial resources of the acquirer and the competitive effects of the acquisition. Any company that acquires control would then be subject to regulation as a savings and loan holding company.

Federal Savings Association Regulation

Business Activities. The activities of federal savings banks are governed by federal laws and regulations. Those laws and regulations delineate the nature and extent of the business activities in which federal savings banks may engage. In particular, certain lending authority for federal savings banks, e.g., commercial, non-residential real property loans and consumer loans, is limited to a specified percentage of the institution’s capital or assets.

The Dodd-Frank Act authorizes the payment of interest on commercial checking accounts, effective July 21, 2011.

Capital Requirements. The Office of Thrift Supervision capital regulations require savings associations to meet three minimum capital standards: a 1.5% tangible capital to total assets ratio; a 4% tier 1 capital to total assets leverage ratio (3% for institutions receiving the highest rating on the CAMELS examination rating system) and an 8% risk-based capital ratio. In addition, the prompt corrective action standards discussed below also establish, in effect, a minimum 2% tangible capital standard, a 4% leverage ratio (3% for institutions receiving the highest rating on the CAMELS system) and, together with the risk-based capital standard itself, a 4% Tier 1 risk-based capital standard. The Office of Thrift Supervision regulations also require that, in meeting the tangible, leverage and risk-based capital standards, institutions must generally deduct investments in and loans to subsidiaries engaged in activities as principal that are not permissible for a national bank.

The risk-based capital standard for savings associations requires the maintenance of Tier 1 (core) and total capital (which is defined as core capital and supplementary capital less certain specified deductions from total capital such as reciprocal holdings of depository institution capital instruments and equity investments) to risk-weighted assets of at least 4% and 8%, respectively. In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets, all assets, including certain off-balance sheet activities, recourse obligations, residual interests and direct credit substitutes, are multiplied by a risk-weight factor of 0% to 100%, assigned by the Office of Thrift Supervision capital regulation based on the risks believed inherent in the type of asset. Core (Tier 1) capital is generally defined as common

stockholders’ equity (including retained earnings), certain non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus and minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries less intangibles other than certain mortgage servicing rights and credit card relationships. The components of supplementary capital (Tier 2 Capital) includes cumulative preferred stock, long-term perpetual preferred stock, mandatory convertible debt securities, subordinated debt and intermediate preferred stock, the allowance for loan and lease losses limited to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets, and up to 45% of unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair market values. Overall, the amount of supplementary capital included as part of total capital cannot exceed 100% of core capital.

The Office of Thrift Supervision also has authority to establish individual minimum capital requirements in appropriate cases upon a determination that an institution’s capital level is or may become inadequate in light of the particular circumstances.

At December 31, 2010, the Bank met each of its capital requirements. See Note 19 in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action. The Office of Thrift Supervision is required to take certain supervisory actions against undercapitalized institutions, the severity of which depends upon the institution’s degree of undercapitalization. Generally, a savings association that has a ratio of total capital to risk weighted assets of less than 8%, a ratio of Tier 1 (core) capital to risk-weighted assets of less than 4% or a ratio of core capital to total assets of less than 4% (3% or less for institutions with the highest examination rating) is considered to be “undercapitalized.” A savings association that has a total risk-based capital ratio less than 6%, a Tier 1 capital ratio of less than 3% or a leverage ratio that is less than 3% is considered to be “significantly undercapitalized” and a savings association that has a tangible capital to assets ratio equal to or less than 2% is deemed to be “critically undercapitalized.” Subject to a narrow exception, the Office of Thrift Supervision is required to appoint a receiver or conservator within specified time frames for an institution that is “critically undercapitalized.” The regulation also provides that a capital restoration plan must be filed with the Office of Thrift Supervision within 45 days of the date a savings association is deemed to have received notice that it is “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized” or “critically undercapitalized.” Compliance with the plan must be guaranteed by any parent holding company up to the lesser of 5% of the savings association’s total assets when it was deemed to be undercapitalized or the amount necessary to achieve compliance with applicable capital requirements. In addition, numerous mandatory supervisory actions become immediately applicable to an undercapitalized institution, including, but not limited to, increased monitoring by regulators and restrictions on growth, capital distributions and expansion. The Office of Thrift Supervision could also take any one of a number of discretionary supervisory actions, including the issuance of a capital directive and the replacement of senior executive officers and directors. Significantly and critically undercapitalized institutions are subject to additional mandatory and discretionary measures.

Insurance of Deposit Accounts. The Bank’s deposits are insured up to applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s risk-based assessment system, insured institutions are assigned to one of four risk categories based on supervisory evaluations, regulatory capital levels and certain other factors, with less risky institutions paying lower assessments. An institution’s assessment rate depends upon the category to which it is assigned, and certain adjustments specified by Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation regulations. Assessment rates currently range from seven to 77.5 basis points of assessable deposits. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation may adjust the scale uniformly, except that no adjustment can deviate more than three basis points from the base scale without notice and comment. No institution may pay a dividend if in default of the federal deposit insurance assessment.

On February 7, 2011, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation approved a final rule that implemented changes to the deposit insurance assessment system mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act. The final rule, which will take effect for the quarter beginning April 1, 2011, requires that the base on which deposit insurance assessments are charged be revised from one that is based on domestic deposits to one that is based on average consolidated total assets minus average tangible equity. Under the final rule, insured depository institutions are required to report their average consolidated total assets on a daily basis, using the regulatory accounting methodology established for reporting total assets. For purposes of the final rule, tangible equity is defined as Tier 1 capital. Prior to the April 1,

2011 effective date of the final rule, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation will continue to calculate the assessment base from adjusted domestic deposits.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation imposed on all insured institutions a special emergency assessment of five basis points of total assets minus Tier 1 capital (as of June 30, 2009), capped at ten basis points of an institution’s deposit assessment base, in order to cover losses to the Deposit Insurance Fund. That special assessment was collected on September 30, 2009. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation provided for similar assessments during the final two quarters of 2009, if deemed necessary.

In lieu of further special assessments, however, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation required insured institutions to prepay estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 through the fourth quarter of 2012. The estimated assessments, which included an assumed annual assessment base increase of 5%, were recorded as a prepaid expense asset as of December 30, 2009. As of December 31, 2009, and each quarter thereafter, a charge to earnings is recorded for each regular assessment with an offsetting credit to the prepaid asset.

Due to the recent difficult economic conditions, deposit insurance per account owner has been raised to $250,000. That coverage was made permanent by the Dodd-Frank Act. In addition, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation adopted an optional Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program by which, for a fee, noninterest-bearing transaction accounts would receive unlimited insurance coverage until June 30, 2010, subsequently extended to December 31, 2010, and certain senior unsecured debt issued by institutions and their holding companies between October 13, 2008 and October 31, 2009 would be guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation through June 30, 2012, or in some cases, December 31, 2012. The Bank opted to participate in the unlimited noninterest- bearing transaction account coverage and the Bank and the Company opted not to participate in the unsecured debt guarantee program. The Dodd-Frank Act extended the unlimited coverage for certain noninterest-bearing transaction accounts from January 1, 2011 until December 31, 2012 without the opportunity for opt out.

In addition to the assessment for deposit insurance, institutions are required to make payments on bonds issued in the late 1980s by the Financing Corporation to recapitalize a predecessor deposit insurance fund. That payment is established quarterly and during the four quarters ended December 31, 2010 averaged 1.05 basis points of assessable deposits.

The Dodd-Frank Act increased the minimum target Deposit Insurance Fund ratio from 1.15% of estimated insured deposits to 1.35% of estimated insured deposits. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation must seek to achieve the 1.35% ratio by September 30, 2020. Insured institutions with assets of $10 billion or more are supposed to fund the increase. The Dodd-Frank Act eliminated the 1.5% maximum fund ratio, instead leaving it to the discretion of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has recently exercised that discretion by establishing a long range fund ratio of 2%.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has authority to increase insurance assessments. A significant increase in insurance premiums would likely have an adverse effect on the operating expenses and results of operations of the Bank. Management cannot predict what insurance assessment rates will be in the future.

Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation upon a finding that the institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or regulatory condition imposed in writing. The management of the Bank does not know of any practice, condition or violation that might lead to termination of deposit insurance.

Loans to One Borrower. Federal law provides that savings associations are generally subject to the limits on loans to one borrower applicable to national banks. Generally, subject to certain exceptions, a savings association may not make a loan or extend credit to a single or related group of borrowers in excess of 15% of its unimpaired capital and surplus. An additional amount may be lent, equal to 10% of unimpaired capital and surplus, if secured by specified readily-marketable collateral.

QTL Test. Federal law requires savings associations to meet a qualified thrift lender test. Under the test, a savings association is required to either qualify as a “domestic building and loan association” under the Internal Revenue Code or maintain at least 65% of its “portfolio assets” (total assets less: (i) specified liquid assets up to

20% of total assets; (ii) intangibles, including goodwill; and (iii) the value of property used to conduct business) in certain “qualified thrift investments” (primarily residential mortgages and related investments, including certain mortgage-backed securities but also including education, credit card and small business loans) in at least 9 months out of each 12 month period.

A savings association that fails the qualified thrift lender test is subject to certain operating restrictions. The Dodd-Frank Act makes noncompliance with the qualified thrift lender test also potentially subject to agency enforcement action for a violation of law. As of December 31, 2010, the Bank maintained 69% of its portfolio assets in qualified thrift investments and, therefore, met the qualified thrift lender test.

Limitation on Capital Distributions. Federal regulations impose limitations upon all capital distributions by a savings association, including cash dividends, payments to repurchase its shares and payments to shareholders of another institution in a cash-out merger. Under the regulations, an application to and prior approval of the Office of Thrift Supervision is required before any capital distribution if the institution does not meet the criteria for “expedited treatment” of applications under Office of Thrift Supervision regulations (i.e., generally, examination and Community Reinvestment Act ratings in the two top categories), the total capital distributions for the calendar year exceed net income for that year plus the amount of retained net income for the preceding two years, the institution would be undercapitalized following the distribution or the distribution would otherwise be contrary to a statute, regulation or agreement with the Office of Thrift Supervision. If an application is not required, the institution must still provide prior notice to the Office of Thrift Supervision of the capital distribution if, like the Bank, it is a subsidiary of a holding company. If the Bank’s capital fell below its regulatory requirements or the Office of Thrift Supervision notified it that it was in need of increased supervision, the Bank’s ability to make capital distributions could be restricted. In addition, the Office of Thrift Supervision could prohibit a proposed capital distribution by any institution, which would otherwise be permitted by the regulation, if the Office of Thrift Supervision determines that such distribution would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice.

Standards for Safety and Soundness. The federal banking agencies have adopted Interagency Guidelines prescribing Standards for Safety and Soundness in various areas such as internal controls and information systems, internal audit, loan documentation and credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth and quality, earnings and compensation, fees and benefits. The guidelines set forth the safety and soundness standards that the federal banking agencies use to identify and address problems at insured depository institutions before capital becomes impaired. If the Office of Thrift Supervision determines that a savings association fails to meet any standard prescribed by the guidelines, the Office of Thrift Supervision may require the institution to submit an acceptable plan to achieve compliance with the standard.

Transactions with Related Parties. The Bank’s authority to engage in transactions with “affiliates” (e.g., any entity that controls or is under common control with the Bank, including the Company and its other subsidiaries) is limited by federal law. The aggregate amount of covered transactions with any individual affiliate is limited to 10% of the capital and surplus of the savings association. The aggregate amount of covered transactions with all affiliates is limited to 20% of the savings association’s capital and surplus. Certain transactions with affiliates are required to be secured by collateral in an amount and of a type specified by federal law. The purchase of low quality assets from affiliates is generally prohibited. Transactions with affiliates must generally be on terms and under circumstances, that are at least as favorable to the institution as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with non-affiliated companies. In addition, savings associations are prohibited from lending to any affiliate that is engaged in activities that are not permissible for bank holding companies and no savings association may purchase the securities of any affiliate other than a subsidiary.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 generally prohibits loans by the Company to its executive officers and directors. However, the law contains a specific exception for loans by a depository institution to its executive officers and directors in compliance with federal banking laws. Under such laws, the Bank’s authority to extend credit to executive officers, directors and 10% shareholders (“insiders”), as well as entities such persons control, is limited. The laws limit both the individual and aggregate amount of loans that the Bank may make to insiders based, in part, on the Bank’s capital level and requires that certain board approval procedures be followed. Such loans are required to be made on terms substantially the same as those offered to unaffiliated individuals and not involve more than the normal risk of repayment. There is an exception for loans made pursuant to a benefit or compensation program that is widely available to all employees of the institution and does not give preference to insiders over other employees. Loans to executive officers are subject to additional limitations based on the type of loan involved.

Enforcement. The Office of Thrift Supervision has primary enforcement responsibility over savings associations and has authority to bring actions against the institution and all institution-affiliated parties, including stockholders, and any attorneys, appraisers and accountants who knowingly or recklessly participate in wrongful action likely to have an adverse effect on an insured institution. Formal enforcement action may range from the issuance of a capital directive or cease and desist order to removal of officers and/or directors to institution of receivership, conservatorship or termination of deposit insurance. Civil penalties cover a wide range of violations and can amount to $25,000 per day, or even $1 million per day in especially egregious cases. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has the authority to recommend to the Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision that enforcement action to be taken with respect to a particular savings association. If action is not taken by the Director, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has authority to take such action under certain circumstances. Federal law also establishes criminal penalties for certain violations.

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency will assume the Office of Thrift Supervision’s enforcement authority as to federal savings associations pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act regulatory restructuring.

Assessments. Savings associations are required to pay assessments to the Office of Thrift Supervision to fund the agency’s operations. The general assessments, paid on a semi-annual basis, are computed based upon the savings association’s (including consolidated subsidiaries) total assets, financial condition and complexity of its portfolio. The Office of Thrift Supervision assessments paid by the Bank for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 totaled $121,000.

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which will succeed to the Office of Thrift Supervision’s supervision of federal savings banks under the Dodd-Frank Act regulatory restructuring, similarly supports its operations through assessments on regulated institutions.

Federal Home Loan Bank System

The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank System, which consists of (12) regional Federal Home Loan Banks. The Federal Home Loan Bank provides a central credit facility primarily for member institutions. The Bank, as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank, is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in that Federal Home Loan Bank. The Bank was in compliance with this requirement with an investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock at December 31, 2010 of $3.2 million.

The Federal Home Loan Banks have been required to provide funds for the resolution of insolvent thrifts in the late 1980s and contribute funds for affordable housing programs. These and similar requirements, or general economic conditions, could reduce the amount of dividends that the Federal Home Loan Banks pay to their members and result in the Federal Home Loan Banks imposing a higher rate of interest on advances to their members. If dividends were reduced, or interest on future Federal Home Loan Bank advances increased, the Bank’s net interest income would likely also be reduced.

Federal Reserve System

The Federal Reserve Board regulations require savings associations to maintain non-interest earning reserves against their transaction accounts (primarily Negotiable Order of Withdrawal (NOW) and regular checking accounts). For 2010, the regulations generally provided that reserves be maintained against aggregate transaction accounts as follows: a 3% reserve ratio was assessed on net transaction accounts up to and including $55.2 million; a 10% reserve ratio was applied above $55.2 million. The first $10.7 million of otherwise reservable balances (subject to adjustments by the Federal Reserve Board) were exempted from the reserve requirements. The amounts are adjusted annually and, for 2011, require a 3% ratio for up to $58.8 million and an exemption of $10.7 million. The Bank complies with the foregoing requirements.

Regulatory Restructuring Legislation

On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Act, which is legislation that restructures the regulation of depository institutions. In addition to eliminating the Office of Thrift Supervision and creating the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Dodd-Frank Act, among other things, requires changes in the way that institutions are assessed for deposit insurance, mandates the imposition of consolidated capital requirements on

savings and loan holding companies, requires that originators of securitized loans retain a percentage of the risk for the transferred loans, directs the Federal Reserve Board to regulate pricing of certain debit card interchange fees, reduces the federal preemption afforded to federal savings associations and contains a number of reforms related to mortgage originations. Many of the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act contain delayed effective dates and/or require the issuance of regulations. As a result, it will be some time before their impact on operations can be assessed by management. However, there is a significant possibility that the Dodd-Frank Act will, at a minimum, result in an increased regulatory burden and higher compliance, operating, and possibly, interest costs for the Company and the Bank.

FEDERAL AND STATE TAXATION

Federal Taxation

General. The Company and the Bank report their income on a calendar year basis using the accrual method of accounting and are subject to federal income taxation in the same manner as other corporations with some exceptions, including particularly the Bank’s reserve for bad debts, as discussed below. The following discussion of tax matters is intended only as a summary and does not purport to be a comprehensive description of the tax rules applicable to the Bank or the Company. The Bank has not been audited by the Internal Revenue Service in the past five years.

Bad Debt Reserve. For taxable years beginning after December 31, 1995, the Bank is entitled to take a bad debt deduction for federal income tax purposes which is based on its current or historic net charge-offs by applying the experience reserve method for banks. For tax years beginning before December 31, 1995, the Bank as a qualifying thrift had been permitted to establish a reserve for bad debts and to make annual additions to such reserve, which were deductible for federal income tax purposes. Under such prior tax law, generally the Bank recognized a bad debt deduction equal to 8% of taxable income.

Under the 1996 Tax Act, the Bank was required to recapture all or a portion of its additions to its bad debt reserve made subsequent to the base year (which is the Bank’s last taxable year beginning before January 1, 1988). This recapture was required to be made, after a deferral period based on certain specified criteria, ratably over a six-year period commencing in the Bank’s calendar 1998 tax year. All post-1987 additions to the statutory bad debt reserve have been recaptured in taxable income as of December 31, 2002.

Potential Recapture of Base Year Bad Debt Reserve. The Bank’s bad debt reserve as of the base year is not subject to automatic recapture as long as the Bank continues to carry on the business of banking and does not meet the definition of a “large bank” as discussed below. If the Bank no longer qualifies as a bank, the balance of the pre-1988 reserves (the base year reserves) are restored to income over a six-year period beginning in the tax year the Bank no longer qualifies as a bank. Such base year bad debt reserve is subject to recapture to the extent that the Bank makes “non-dividend distributions” that are considered as made from the base year bad debt reserve. To the extent that such reserves exceed the amount that would have been allowed under the experience method (“Excess Distributions”), then an amount based on the amount distributed will be included in the Bank’s taxable income. Non-dividend distributions include distributions in excess of the Bank’s current and accumulated earnings and profits, distributions in redemption of stock, and distributions in partial or complete liquidation. However, dividends paid out of the Bank’s current or accumulated earnings and profits, as calculated for federal income tax purposes, will not be considered to result in a distribution from the Bank’s bad debt reserve. Thus, any dividends to the Company that would reduce amounts appropriated to the Bank’s bad debt reserve and deducted for federal income tax purposes would create a tax liability for the Bank. The amount of additional taxable income created from an Excess Distribution is an amount that, when reduced by the tax attributable to the income, is equal to the amount of the distribution. If the Bank makes a “non-dividend distribution,” then approximately one and one-half times the amount so used would be includable in gross income for federal income tax purposes, assuming a 34% corporate income tax rate (exclusive of state and local taxes). The Bank does not intend to pay dividends that would result in a recapture of any portion of its bad debt reserve.

Further recapture of the Bank’s tax bad debt reserve is also triggered if the Bank meets the definition of a “large bank” as defined in the Internal Revenue Code. Under the Internal Revenue Code, if a bank’s average adjusted assets exceeds $500 million for any tax year it is considered a “large bank” and must utilize the specific

charge-off method to compute tax bad debt deductions. For additional information, see Note 12 in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax. The Internal Revenue Code imposes a tax on alternative minimum taxable income (“AMTI”) at a rate of 20%. The excess of the bad debt reserve deduction claimed by the Bank over the deduction that would have been allowable under the experience method is treated as a preference item for purposes of computing the AMTI. Only 90% of AMTI can be offset by net operating loss carry-overs, of which the Bank currently has none. AMTI is increased by an amount equal to 75% of the amount by which the Bank’s adjusted current earnings exceed its AMTI (determined without regard to this preference and before reduction for net operating losses). In addition, for taxable years beginning after June 30, 1986 and before January 1, 1996, an environmental tax of 0.12% of the excess of AMTI (with certain modifications) over $2.0 million is imposed on corporations, including the Bank, whether or not an Alternative Minimum Tax (“AMT”) is paid. The Bank does not expect to be subject to the AMT.

Dividends Received Deduction and Other Matters. The Company may exclude from its income 100% of dividends received from the Bank as a member of the same affiliated group of corporations. The corporate dividends received deduction is generally 70% in the case of dividends received from unaffiliated corporations with which the Company and the Bank will not file a consolidated tax return, except that if the Company or the Bank own more than 20% of the stock of a corporation distributing a dividend, then 80% of any dividends received may be deducted.

Indiana Taxation

Indiana imposes an 8.5% franchise tax based on a financial institution’s adjusted gross income as defined by statute. In computing adjusted gross income, deductions for municipal interest, United States Government interest, the bad debt deduction computed using the reserve method and pre-1990 net operating losses are disallowed. During the past five years, the Bank’s Indiana state income tax returns for the years 2003 through 2005 were audited, with no changes made.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

Above average interest rate risk associated with fixed-rate loans may have an adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

The Bank’s loan portfolio includes a significant amount of loans with fixed rates of interest. At December 31, 2010, $150.5 million, or 49.9% of the Bank’s total loans receivable, had fixed interest rates all of which were held for investment. The Bank offers ARM loans and fixed-rate loans. Unlike ARM loans, fixed-rate loans carry the risk that, because they do not reprice to market interest rates, their yield may be insufficient to offset increases in the Bank’s cost of funds during a rising interest rate environment. Accordingly, a material and prolonged increase in market interest rates could be expected to have a greater adverse effect on the Bank’s net interest income compared to other institutions that hold a materially larger portion of their assets in ARM loans or fixed-rate loans that are originated for committed sale in the secondary market. For a discussion of the Bank’s loan portfolio, see “Item 1. Business– Lending Activities.”

Higher loan losses could require the Company to increase its allowance for loan losses through a charge to earnings.

When we loan money we incur the risk that our borrowers do not repay their loans. We reserve for loan losses by establishing an allowance through a charge to earnings. The amount of this allowance is based on our assessment of loan losses inherent in our loan portfolio. The process for determining the amount of the allowance is critical to our financial results and condition. It requires subjective and complex judgments about the future, including forecasts of economic or market conditions that might impair the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans. We might underestimate the loan losses inherent in our loan portfolio and have loan losses in excess of the amount reserved. We might increase the allowance because of changing economic conditions. For example, in a rising interest rate environment, borrowers with adjustable-rate loans could see their payments increase. There may be a significant increase in the number of borrowers who are unable or unwilling to repay their loans, resulting in our charging off more loans and increasing our allowance. In addition, when real estate values decline, the potential

severity of loss on a real estate-secured loan can increase significantly, especially in the case of loans with high combined loan-to-value ratios. Our allowance for loan losses at any particular date may not be sufficient to cover future loan losses. We may be required to increase our allowance for loan losses, thus reducing earnings.

Commercial business lending may expose the Company to increased lending risks.

At December 31, 2010, the Bank’s commercial business loan portfolio amounted to $21.9 million, or 7.3% of total loans. Subject to market conditions and other factors, the Bank intends to expand its commercial business lending activities within its primary market area. Commercial business lending is inherently riskier than one- to four-family mortgage lending. Although commercial business loans are often collateralized by equipment, inventory, accounts receivable or other business assets, the liquidation value of these assets in the event of a borrower default is often an insufficient source of repayment because accounts receivable may be uncollectible and inventories and equipment may be obsolete or of limited use, among other things. See “Item 1. Business–Lending Activities–Commercial Business Loans.”

Commercial real estate lending may expose the Company to increased lending risks.

At December 31, 2010, the Bank’s commercial real estate loan portfolio amounted to $59.9 million, or 19.8% of total loans. Commercial real estate lending is inherently riskier than one- to-four family mortgage lending. Because payments on loans secured by commercial properties often depend upon the successful operation and management of the properties, repayment of such loans may be affected by adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy, among other things. See “Item 1. Business–Lending Activities–Commercial Real Estate Loans.”

A continuation of recent turmoil in the financial markets could have an adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

Beginning in 2008, United States and global financial markets have experienced severe disruption and volatility, and general economic conditions have declined significantly. Adverse developments in credit quality, asset values and revenue opportunities throughout the financial services industry, as well as general uncertainty regarding the economic, industry and regulatory environment, have had a marked negative impact on the industry. Dramatic declines in the U.S. housing market over the past eighteen months, with falling home prices, increasing foreclosures and increasing unemployment, have negatively affected the credit performance of mortgage loans and resulted in significant write-downs of asset values by many financial institutions. The United States and the governments of other countries have taken steps to try to stabilize the financial system, including investing in financial institutions, and have also been working to design and implement programs to improve general economic conditions. Notwithstanding the actions of the United States and other governments, these efforts may not succeed in restoring industry, economic or market conditions and may result in adverse unintended consequences. Factors that could continue to pressure financial services companies, including the Company, are numerous and include (i) worsening credit quality, leading among other things to increases in loan losses and reserves, (ii) continued or worsening disruption and volatility in financial markets, leading among other things to continuing reductions in asset values, (iii) capital and liquidity concerns regarding financial institutions generally, (iv) limitations resulting from or imposed in connection with governmental actions intended to stabilize or provide additional regulation of the financial system, or (v) recessionary conditions that are deeper or last longer than currently anticipated.

The current economic recession could result in increases in our level of non-performing loans and/or reduce demand for our products and services, which would lead to lower revenue, higher loan losses and lower earnings.

Our business activities and earnings are affected by general business conditions in the United States and in our primary market area. These conditions include short-term and long-term interest rates, inflation, unemployment levels, monetary supply, consumer confidence and spending, fluctuations in both debt and equity capital markets and the strength of the economy in the United States generally and in our primary market area in particular. In the current recession, the national economy has experienced general economic downturns, with rising unemployment levels, declines in real estate values and erosion in consumer confidence. The current economic recession has also had a negative impact on our primary market area, which has experienced a softening of the local real estate market and reductions in local property values. A prolonged or more severe economic downturn, continued elevated levels

of unemployment, further declines in the values of real estate, or other events that affect household and/or corporate incomes could impair the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans in accordance with their terms. The economic downturn could also result in reduced demand for credit or fee-based products and services, which also would decrease our revenues.

Increased and/or special Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation assessments will hurt our earnings.

The recent economic recession has caused a high level of bank failures, which has dramatically increased Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation resolution costs and led to a significant reduction in the balance of the Deposit Insurance Fund. As a result, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has significantly increased the initial base assessment rates paid by financial institutions for deposit insurance. Increases in the base assessment rate have increased our deposit insurance costs and negatively impacted our earnings. In addition, in May 2009, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation imposed a special assessment on all insured institutions. Our special assessment, which was reflected in earnings for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, was $205,000. In lieu of imposing an additional special assessment, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation required all institutions to prepay their assessments for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012, which for us totaled $2.3 million. Additional increases in the base assessment rate or additional special assessments would negatively impact our earnings.

Strong competition within the Bank’s market area could hurt the Company’s profit and growth.

The Bank faces intense competition both in making loans and attracting deposits. This competition has made it more difficult for it to make new loans and at times has forced it to offer higher deposit rates. Price competition for loans and deposits might result in the Bank earning less on loans paying more on deposits, which would reduce net interest income. Competition also makes it more difficult to grow loans and deposits. Some of the institutions with which the Bank competes have substantially greater resources and lending limits than it has and may offer services that the Bank does not provide. Future competition will likely increase because of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and the continuing trend of consolidation in the financial services industry. The Company’s profitability depends upon the Bank’s continued ability to compete successfully in its market area.

The Bank and the Company operate in a highly regulated environment and may be adversely affected by changes in laws and regulations.

The Company and the Bank are subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by the Office of Thrift Supervision, their chartering authority, and by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as insurer of the Bank’s deposits. The Company and the Bank are both subject to regulation and supervision by the Office of Thrift Supervision. Such regulations and supervision governs the activities in which an institution and its holding company may engage, and are intended primarily for the protection of the insurance fund and depositors. Regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in their supervisory and enforcement activities, including to imposition of restrictions on operations, the classification of assets and determination of the level of allowance for loan losses. Any change in such regulation and oversight, whether in the form of regulatory policy, regulations, legislation or supervisory claim may have a material impact on the Bank’s operations.

Recently enacted legislative reforms and future regulatory reforms required by such legislation could have a significant impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Dodd-Frank Act will have a broad impact on the financial services industry, including significant regulatory and compliance changes. Many of the requirements called for in the Dodd-Frank Act will be implemented over time and most will be subject to implementing regulations over the course of several years. Given the uncertainty associated with the manner in which the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act will be implemented by the various regulatory agencies and through regulations, the full extent of the impact such requirements will have on our operations is unclear. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act restructures the existing regulatory regime for depository institutions insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Office of Thrift Supervision will be merged into the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency over a one year transition period (subject to a possible six month extension by the Secretary of the Treasury). While our federal savings association charter is preserved, federal thrifts will be regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, along with national banks and federal branches and agencies of foreign banks. The Federal Reserve Board will continue to supervise all bank holding companies and will assume jurisdiction over savings and loan holding companies. The Dodd-Frank Act codifies the

Federal Reserve Board’s existing “source of strength” policy that holding companies act as a source of strength to their insured institution subsidiaries by providing capital, liquidity and other support in times of distress. While it is difficult to predict at this time what specific impact the Dodd-Frank Act and the related yet to be written implementing rules and regulations will have on us, we expect that, at a minimum, our operating and compliance costs will increase, and our interest expense could increase, as a result of these new rules and regulations.

ITEM 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Bank’s offices as of December 31, 2010.


Location	Year Opened		Net Book Value⁽¹⁾		Owned/ Leased			Approximate Square Footage
			(Dollars in thousands)
Main Office:

220 Federal Drive, N.W. Corydon, Indiana 47112		1997	$	1,667		Owned			12,000

Branch Offices:

391 Old Capital Plaza, N.E. Corydon, Indiana 47112		1997		8		Leased	⁽²⁾		425

8095 State Highway 135, N.W. New Salisbury, Indiana 47161		1999		648		Owned			3,500

710 Main Street Palmyra, Indiana 47164		1991		943		Owned			6,000

9849 Highway 150 Greenville, Indiana 47124		1986		208		Owned			2,484

5100 State Road 64 (Edwardsville Branch) Georgetown, Indiana 47122		2008		1,458		Owned			4,988

317 East U.S. Highway 150 Hardinsburg, Indiana 47125		1996		118		Owned			1,834

4303 Charlestown Crossing New Albany, Indiana 47150		1999		772		Owned			3,500

3131 Grant Line Road New Albany, Indiana 47150		2003		1,284		Owned			12,200

5609 Williamsburg Station Road Floyds Knobs, Indiana 47119		2003		546		Owned			4,160

2744 Allison Lane Jeffersonville, Indiana 47130		2003		1,255		Owned			4,090

1312 S. Jackson Street Salem, Indiana 47167		2007		1,106		Owned			3,400

2420 Barron Avenue NE Lanesville, Indiana 47136		2010		954		Owned			1,450

(1)	Represents the net value of land, buildings, furniture, fixtures and equipment owned by the Bank.

(2)	Lease expires in April 2015.

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

At December 31, 2010, neither the Company nor the Bank was involved in any pending legal proceedings believed by management to be material to the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. From time to time, the Bank is involved in legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business. Such routine legal proceedings, in the aggregate, are believed by management to be immaterial to the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

ITEM 4.

[REMOVED AND RESERVED]

PART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

The common shares of the Company are traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “FCAP.” As of December 31, 2010, the Company had 1,246 stockholders of record and 2,787,301 common shares outstanding. This does not reflect the number of persons whose shares are in nominee or “street” name accounts through brokers. See Note 18 in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statement for information regarding dividend restrictions applicable to the Company.

The following table lists quarterly market price and dividend information per common share for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 as reported by NASDAQ.


	High Sale		Low Sale		Dividends		Market price end of period
2010:
First Quarter	$	16.90	$	13.55	$	0.18	$	14.60
Second Quarter		15.73		14.25		0.18		15.00
Third Quarter		16.00		14.19		0.19		15.24
Fourth Quarter		16.69		14.80		0.19		16.64

2009:
First Quarter	$	15.28	$	11.77	$	0.18	$	14.90
Second Quarter		18.49		14.10		0.18		17.35
Third Quarter		18.27		15.75		0.18		17.50
Fourth Quarter		17.88		13.17		0.18		15.19

The following table provides certain information with regard to shares repurchased by the Company in the fourth quarter of 2010.


Period	(a) Total Number of Shares Purchased		(b) Average Price Paid Per Share		(c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		(d) Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
October 1 through October 31, 2010		—		N/A		—		191,890
November 1 through November 30, 2010		8	$	15.82		8		191,882
December 1 through December 31, 2010		—		N/A		—		191,882

Total		8				8

On August 19, 2008, the board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 240,467 shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock. The stock repurchase program will expire upon the purchase of the maximum number of shares authorized under the program, unless the board of directors terminates the program earlier.

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The consolidated financial data presented below is qualified in its entirety by the more detailed financial data appearing elsewhere in this report, including the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements.


FINANCIAL CONDITION DATA:	At December 31,
	2010		2009			2008		2007		2006
	*(In thousands)*
Total assets	$	452,378	$	455,534		$	458,625	$	453,179	$	457,105
Cash and cash equivalents (1)		21,575		15,857			22,149		15,055		24,468
Securities available for sale		100,851		93,729			82,733		72,991		71,362
Securities held to maturity		32		62			86		1,050		1,118
Net loans		294,550		311,092			322,385		334,463		333,575
Deposits		378,003		374,476			355,891		328,151		331,143
Retail repurchase agreements		8,669		7,949			4,552		15,562		19,228
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		15,729		24,776			47,830		60,694		59,461
Stockholders’ equity, net of noncontrolling interest in subsidiary		47,893		45,944			47,522		45,736		44,089

OPERATING DATA:	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2010		2009			2008		2007		2006
	*(In thousands)*
Interest income	$	21,834	$	22,969		$	25,686	$	27,085	$	26,211
Interest expense		5,502		8,388			10,745		13,699		12,741

Net interest income		16,332		14,581			14,941		13,386		13,470
Provision for loan losses		2,037		4,289			1,570		558		810

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		14,295		10,292			13,371		12,828		12,660


Noninterest income		3,906		3,373			3,573		3,524		3,471
Noninterest expense		12,762		13,473			11,846		11,349		10,551


Income before income taxes		5,439		192			5,098		5,003		5,580

Income tax expense (benefit)		1,561		(586	)		1,529		1,591		1,872

Net Income		3,878		778			3,569		3,412		3,708


Less: net income attributable to non-controlling interest in subsidiary		13		12			—		—		—

Net Income Attributable to First Capital, Inc.	$	3,865	$	766		$	3,569	$	3,412	$	3,708


PER SHARE DATA (2):
Net income - basic	$	1.39	$	0.28		$	1.27	$	1.21	$	1.31
Net income - diluted		1.39		0.28			1.27		1.20		1.30
Dividends		0.74		0.72			0.71		0.68		0.68

(1)	Includes cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits in other depository institutions and federal funds sold.

(2)	Per share data excludes net income attributable to non-controlling interest in subsidiary.


SELECTED FINANCIAL RATIOS:	At or For the Year Ended December 31,
	2010			2009			2008			2007			2006
*Performance Ratios:*

Return on assets (1)		0.84	%		0.17	%		0.79	%		0.76	%		0.84	%
Return on average equity (2)		8.10	%		1.62	%		7.65	%		7.74	%		8.64	%
Dividend payout ratio (3)		53.24	%		257.14	%		55.91	%		56.20	%		51.91	%
Average equity to average assets		10.43	%		10.34	%		10.31	%		9.87	%		9.66	%
Interest rate spread (4)		3.74	%		3.26	%		3.30	%		2.82	%		2.90	%
Net interest margin (5)		3.96	%		3.56	%		3.68	%		3.31	%		3.34	%
Non-interest expense to average assets		2.79	%		2.95	%		2.62	%		2.54	%		2.38	%
Average interest earning assets to average interest bearing liabilities		116.24	%		115.08	%		114.89	%		114.94	%		114.25	%

*Regulatory Capital Ratios (Bank only):*

Tier I - adjusted total assets		9.32	%		8.66	%		8.98	%		8.25	%		7.95	%
Tier I - risk based		14.83	%		13.39	%		14.10	%		12.63	%		12.57	%
Total risk-based		15.54	%		13.99	%		14.77	%		13.20	%		13.15	%

*Asset Quality Ratios:*

Nonperforming loans as a percent of net loans (6)		2.69	%		3.06	%		1.72	%		1.70	%		1.31	%
Nonperforming assets as a percent of total assets (7)		1.88	%		2.28	%		1.40	%		1.44	%		1.16	%
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of gross loans receivable		1.48	%		1.54	%		0.81	%		0.65	%		0.68	%

(1)	Net income attributable to First Capital, Inc. divided by average assets.

(2)	Net income attributable to First Capital, Inc. divided by average equity.

(3)	Dividends declared per share divided by net income per share.

(4)	Difference between weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.

Tax exempt income is reported on a tax equivalent basis using a federal marginal tax rate of 34%.

(5)	Net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.

(6)	Nonperforming loans consist of loans accounted for on a nonaccrual basis and accruing loans 90 days or more past due.

(7)	Nonperforming assets consist of nonperforming loans and real estate acquired in settlement of loans.

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

General

As the holding company for the Bank, the Company conducts its business primarily through the Bank. The Bank’s results of operations depend primarily on net interest income, which is the difference between the income earned on its interest-earning assets, such as loans and investments, and the cost of its interest-bearing liabilities, consisting primarily of deposits, retail repurchase agreements and borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis. The Bank’s net income is also affected by, among other things, fee income, provisions for loan losses, operating expenses and income tax provisions. The Bank’s results of operations are also significantly affected by general economic and competitive conditions, particularly changes in market interest rates, government legislation and policies concerning monetary and fiscal affairs, housing and financial institutions and the intended actions of the regulatory authorities.

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is intended to assist in understanding the financial condition and results of operations of the Company and the Bank. The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

Operating Strategy

The Company is the parent company of an independent community-oriented financial institution that delivers quality customer service and offers a wide range of deposit, loan and investment products to its customers. The commitment to customer needs, the focus on providing consistent customer service, and community service and support are the keys to the Bank’s past and future success. The Company has no other material income other than that generated by the Bank and its subsidiaries.

The Bank’s primary business strategy is attracting deposits from the general public and using those funds to originate one-to-four-family residential mortgage loans, multi-family residential loans, commercial real estate and business loans and consumer loans. The Bank invests excess liquidity primarily in interest-bearing deposits with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis and other financial institutions, federal funds sold, U.S. government and agency securities, local municipal obligations and mortgage-backed securities.

In recent years, the Company’s operating strategy has also included strategies designed to enhance profitability by increasing sources of noninterest income and improving operating efficiency while managing its capital and limiting its credit risk and interest rate risk exposures. To accomplish these objectives, the Company has focused on the following:

•

Monitoring asset quality and credit risk in the loan and investment portfolios, with an emphasis on reducing nonperforming assets and originating high-quality commercial and consumer loans.

•

Being active in the local community, particularly through our efforts with local schools, to uphold our high standing in our community and marketing to our next generation of customers.

•

Improving profitability by expanding our product offerings to customers and investing in technology to increase the productivity and efficiency of our staff.

•

Continuing to emphasize commercial real estate and other commercial business lending as well as consumer lending. The Bank will also continue to focus on increasing secondary market lending as a source of noninterest income.

•

Growing commercial and personal demand deposit accounts which provide a low-cost funding source.

•

Evaluating vendor contracts for potential cost savings and efficiencies.

•

Continuing our capital management strategy to enhance shareholder value through the repurchase of Company stock and the payment of dividends.

•

Evaluating growth opportunities to expand the Bank’s market area and market share through acquisitions of other financial institutions or branches of other institutions.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The accounting and reporting policies of the Company comply with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and conform to general practices within the banking industry. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions. The financial position and results of operations can be affected by these estimates and assumptions, which are integral to understanding reported results. Critical accounting policies are those policies that require management to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time an accounting estimate is made; and different estimates that the Company reasonably could have used in the current period, or changes in the accounting estimate that are reasonably likely to occur from period to period, would have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, changes in financial condition or results of operations. Most accounting policies are not considered by management to be critical accounting policies. Several factors are considered in determining whether or not a policy is critical in the preparation of financial statements. These factors include, among other things, whether the estimates are significant to the financial statements, the nature of the estimates, the ability to readily validate the estimates with other information including third parties or available prices, and sensitivity of the estimates to changes in economic conditions and whether alternative accounting methods may be utilized under generally accepted accounting principles.

Significant accounting policies, including the impact of recent accounting pronouncements, are discussed in Note 1 of the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Those policies considered to be critical accounting policies are described below.

Allowances for Loan Losses. Management’s evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is the most critical of accounting estimates for a financial institution. The methodology for determining the allowance for loan losses and the related provision for loan losses is described below in “Allowance for Loan Losses.” This accounting estimate is highly subjective and requires a significant amount of judgment because a multitude of factors can influence the ultimate collection of a loan. The methodology for determining the allowance for loan losses attempts to identify the amount of probable losses in the loan portfolio. However, there can be no assurance that the methodology will successfully identify all probable losses as the factors and conditions that influence the estimate are subject to significant change and management’s judgments. As a result, additional provisions for loan losses may be required that would adversely impact earnings in future periods. For additional discussion of the allowance for loan losses methodology, see Note 1 and Note 4 of the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairment of Securities. The Company reviews all investment securities with significant declines in fair value for potential other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) on a periodic basis. In evaluating the investment portfolio for OTTI, management considers the issuer’s credit rating, credit outlook, payment status and financial condition, the length of time the investment has been in a loss position, the size of the loss position and other meaningful information. Generally changes in market interest rates that result in a decline in value of an investment security are considered to be temporary, since the value of such investment can recover in the foreseeable future as market interest rates return to their original levels. However, such declines in value that are due to the underlying credit quality of the issuer or other adverse conditions that cannot be expected to improve in the foreseeable future, may be considered to be other-than-temporary. The Company recognizes credit-related OTTI on debt securities in earnings, while noncredit-related OTTI on debt securities not expected to be sold is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income. Management believes this is a critical accounting policy because this evaluation of the underlying credit or analysis of other conditions contributing to the decline in value involves a high degree of complexity and requires us to make subjective judgments that often require assumptions or estimates about various matters. As of December 31, 2010, the Company has not recognized any OTTI charges. See Note 3 of the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding OTTI.

Valuation Methodologies. In the ordinary course of business, management applies various valuation methodologies to assets and liabilities that often involve a significant degree of judgment, particularly when active markets do not exist for the items being valued. Generally, in evaluating various assets for potential impairment, management compares the fair value to the carrying value. Quoted market prices are referred to when estimating fair values for certain assets, such as investment securities. However, for those items for which market-based prices do not exist, management utilizes significant estimates and assumptions to value such items. Examples of these items include goodwill and other intangible assets, estimated present value of impaired loans, value ascribed to stock-based compensation and certain other financial investments. The use of different assumptions could produce significantly different results, which could have material positive or negative effects on the Company’s results of operations.

Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2009

Net Income. Net income attributable to the Company was $3.9 million ($1.39 per share diluted; weighted average common shares outstanding of 2,786,227, as adjusted) for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $766,000 ($0.28 per share diluted; weighted average common shares outstanding of 2,784,080, as adjusted) for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $1.8 million, or 12.0%, from $14.6 million in 2009 to $16.3 million in 2010 primarily due to an increase in the interest rate spread.

Total interest income decreased 4.9% from $23.0 million in 2009 to $21.8 million in 2010. This decrease was primarily a result of the average tax-equivalent yield of interest-earning assets decreasing from 5.53% for the year ended December 31, 2009 to 5.24% for 2010. Interest on loans decreased $979,000 as a result of the average tax-equivalent yield on loans decreasing from 6.09% in 2009 to 5.99% in 2010 and the average balance of loans decreasing from $322.0 million in 2009 to $310.8 million in 2010. Interest on investment securities decreased $152,000 during 2010 due to the average tax-equivalent yield of investment securities decreasing from 4.42% in 2009 to 3.69% in 2010 partially offset by the average balance of investment securities increasing from $87.6 million in 2009 to $101.3 million in 2010. Management continued to focus loan origination efforts on commercial and consumer loans during 2010. The majority of the new commercial loans are adjustable-rate loans. Adjustable-rate loans now comprise 50% of the total loan portfolio, compared to 48% at the end of 2009. Market interest rates remained at near historic lows throughout 2010, so as loans and investment securities mature or pay down they are replaced with lower yielding new originations and purchases.

Total interest expense decreased $2.9 million, from $8.4 million for 2009 to $5.5 million for 2010, primarily due to a decrease in the average cost of funds from 2.27% in 2009 to 1.50% in 2010. The decrease was primarily due to the average cost of interest-bearing deposits, which decreased from 1.88% in 2009 to 1.32% in 2010 due to the continued repricing of time deposits. The average cost of Federal Home Loan Bank advances decreased from 5.54% in 2009 to 4.37% in 2010, and the average balance of Federal Home Loan Bank advances decreased from $40.5 million in 2009 to $23.1 million in 2010, due to the Bank pre-paying $8.0 million in advances in December 2009 and the maturity of additional higher-rate advances in 2010. The advances paid off in December 2009 had a weighted average interest rate of 5.97%, and the Bank incurred a prepayment penalty of $295,000 that was reported as interest expense in 2009. This additional interest expense increased the average cost of advances by 0.73% in 2009 and for all interest-bearing liabilities by 0.08% during the period. For further information, see “Average Balance Sheets” below. The changes in interest income and interest expense resulting from changes in volume and changes in rates for 2010 and 2009 are shown in the schedule captioned “Rate/Volume Analysis” included herein.

Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses was $2.0 million for 2010 compared to $4.3 million in 2009. The consistent application of management’s allowance methodology resulted in a decrease in the provision for loan losses during 2010. During 2009, the Bank provided for specific reserves of $2.3 million on two commercial relationships totaling $4.6 million, which were secured by commercial real estate and equipment. One of those commercial relationships, totaling $2.6 million at December 31, 2009, was fully satisfied during 2010 as a result of the liquidation of collateral and charge-off of the remaining $1.4 million balance, and was the primary factor contributing to a decrease in nonperforming loans from $9.5 million at December 31, 2009 to $7.9 million at December 31, 2010. Net charge offs increased when comparing the two periods, from $2.0 million during 2009 to $2.5 million during 2010. The provisions were recorded to bring the allowance to the level determined in applying the allowance methodology after reduction for net charge-offs during the year and to allow for inherent loss exposure due to weakened general economic conditions such as depreciating collateral values, job losses and continued pressures on household budgets in the Bank’s market area.

Provisions for loan losses are charges to earnings to maintain the total allowance for loan losses at a level considered reasonable by management to provide for probable known and inherent loan losses based on management’s evaluation of the collectability of the loan portfolio, including the nature of the portfolio, credit concentrations, trends in historical loss experience, specified impaired loans and economic conditions. Although management uses the best information available, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary due to changes in economic, operating, regulatory and other conditions that may be beyond the Bank’s control. While the Bank maintains the allowance for loan losses at a level that it considers adequate to provide for estimated losses, there can be no assurance that further additions will not be made to the allowance for loan losses and that actual losses will not exceed the estimated amounts.

Noninterest income. Noninterest income increased $533,000 to $3.9 million for 2010 compared to $3.4 million for 2009. Service charges on deposit accounts increased $325,000 when comparing the two periods due to an increase in debit card income. Gains on the sale of mortgage loans also increased $210,000 when comparing the two periods due primarily to an improvement in the spread realized when the loans are sold.

Noninterest expense. Noninterest expense decreased $711,000, or 5.3%, to $12.8 million for 2010 compared to $13.5 million for 2009. The decrease was primarily due to decreases in data processing expenses, deposit insurance premiums and other operating expenses of $439,000, $303,000 and $258,000, respectively. The decrease in data processing expenses was primarily due to a decrease of $454,000 in ATM processing fees, related to a disputed charge paid in 2009 of which the Bank recovered $278,000 in 2010 that was partially offset by a $225,00 incentive received by the Bank in 2009 for switching its ATM processor. The decrease in deposit insurance premiums is primarily due to the 2009 special assessment imposed on all banks by the FDIC totaling $205,000. The decrease in other operating expenses was primarily due to decreases in loan expense, foreclosed real estate expenses and general office expenses.

Income tax expense. The Company recognized income tax expense of $1.6 million during 2010 compared to an income tax benefit of $586,000 for 2009. The income tax expense for 2010 is primarily due to an increase in income before taxes for the year. The effective tax rate for 2010 was 28.7%. See Note 12 in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Average Balances and Yields. The following table sets forth certain information for the periods indicated regarding average balances of assets and liabilities, as well as the total dollar amounts of interest income from average interest-earnings assets and interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities and average yields and costs. Such yields and costs for the periods indicated are derived by dividing income or expense by the average historical cost balances of assets or liabilities, respectively, for the periods presented and do not give effect to changes in fair value that are included as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Average balances are derived from daily balances. Tax-exempt income on loans and investment securities has been adjusted to a tax equivalent basis using the federal marginal tax rate of 34%.


	Year Ended December 31,
	2010							2009							2008
(Dollars in thousands)	Average Balance		Interest		Average Yield/ Cost			Average Balance		Interest		Average Yield/ Cost			Average Balance		Interest		Average Yield/ Cost
Interest-earning assets:
Loans (1) (2):
Taxable (3)	$	310,644	$	18,598		5.99	%	$	319,510	$	19,517		6.11	%	$	327,698	$	22,013		6.72	%
Tax-exempt		187		13		6.95	%		2,502		104		4.16	%		2,220		149		6.71	%

Total loans		310,831		18,611		5.99	%		322,012		19,621		6.09	%		329,918		22,162		6.72	%


Investment securities:
Taxable (3)		74,313		2,132		2.87	%		62,149		2,354		3.79	%		53,478		2,420		4.53	%
Tax-exempt		27,029		1,606		5.94	%		25,450		1,521		5.98	%		23,475		1,397		5.95	%

Total investment securities		101,342		3,738		3.69	%		87,599		3,875		4.42	%		76,953		3,817		4.96	%


Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits with banks		14,679		35		0.24	%		15,800		25		0.16	%		13,436		233		1.73	%

Total interest-earning assets		426,852		22,384		5.24	%		425,411		23,521		5.53	%		420,307		26,212		6.24	%


Noninterest-earning assets		30,738							31,193							31,823

Total assets	$	457,590						$	456,604						$	452,130


Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand deposits	$	159,286	$	1,224		0.77	%	$	130,848	$	1,102		0.84	%	$	108,230	$	1,283		1.19	%
Savings accounts		43,990		103		0.23	%		39,964		149		0.37	%		33,183		247		0.74	%
Time deposits		132,693		3,092		2.33	%		152,916		4,844		3.17	%		159,012		6,404		4.03	%

Total deposits		335,969		4,419		1.32	%		323,728		6,095		1.88	%		300,425		7,934		2.64	%


Retail repurchase agreements		8,142		73		0.90	%		5,428		51		0.94	%		11,759		248		2.11	%
FHLB advances		23,116		1,010		4.37	%		40,500		2,242		5.54	%		53,639		2,563		4.78	%

Total interest-bearing liabilities		367,227		5,502		1.50	%		369,656		8,388		2.27	%		365,823		10,745		2.94	%


Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
Noninterest-bearing deposits		41,220							38,547							37,069
Other liabilities		1,407							1,168							2,611

Total liabilities		409,854							409,371							405,503
Stockholders’ equity		47,736							47,233							46,627


Total liabilities and Stockholders’ equity (4)	$	457,590						$	456,604						$	452,130


Net interest income			$	16,882						$	15,133						$	15,467


Interest rate spread						3.74	%						3.26	%						3.30	%


Net interest margin						3.96	%						3.56	%						3.68	%


Ratio of average interest – earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities						116.24	%						115.08	%						114.89	%

(1)	Interest income on loans includes fee income of $633,000, $642,000 and $620,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.

(2)	Average loan balances include loans held for sale and nonperforming loans.

(3)	Includes taxable debt and equity securities and Federal Home Loan Bank Stock.

(4)	Stockholders’ equity attributable to First Capital, Inc.

Rate/Volume Analysis. The following table sets forth the effects of changing rates and volumes on net interest income and interest expense computed on a tax-equivalent basis. Information is provided with respect to (i) effects on interest income attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate); (ii) effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume); and (iii) effects attributable to changes in rate and volume (change in rate multiplied by changes in volume). Tax exempt income on loans and investment securities has been adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis using the federal marginal tax rate of 34%.


	2010 Compared to 2009 Increase (Decrease) Due to												2009 Compared to 2008 Increase (Decrease) Due to
	Rate			Volume			Rate/ Volume			Net			Rate			Volume			Rate/ Volume			Net
	(In thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans:
Taxable	$	(385	)	$	(545	)	$	11		$	(919	)	$	(1,996	)	$	(550	)	$	50		$	(2,496	)
Tax-exempt		70			(96	)		(65	)		(91	)		(57	)		19			(7	)		(45	)

Total investment securities		(315	)		(641	)		(54	)		(1,010	)		(2,053	)		(531	)		43			(2,541	)


Investment securities:
Taxable		(571	)		461			(112	)		(222	)		(395	)		393			(64	)		(66	)
Tax-exempt		(10	)		96			(1	)		85			5			118			1			124

Total investment securities		(581	)		557			(113	)		(137	)		(390	)		511			(63	)		58

Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits with banks		13			(2	)		(1	)		10			(211	)		40			(37	)		(208	)

Total net change in income on interest- earning assets		(883	)		(86	)		(168	)		(1,137	)		(2,654	)		20			(57	)		(2,691	)


Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits		(1,833	)		226			(69	)		(1,676	)		(2,277	)		615			(177	)		(1,839	)
Retail repurchase agreements		(2	)		25			(1	)		22			(137	)		(134	)		74			(197	)
FHLB advances		(473	)		(962	)		203			(1,232	)		407			(628	)		(100	)		(321	)

Total net change in expense on interest- bearing liabilities		(2,308	)		(711	)		133			(2,886	)		(2,007	)		(147	)		(203	)		(2,357	)

Net change in net interest income	$	1,425		$	625		$	(301	)	$	1,749		$	(647	)	$	167		$	146		$	(334	)

Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2010 and 2009

Total assets decreased 0.7% from $455.5 million at December 31, 2009 to $452.4 million at December 31, 2010 primarily due to a decrease in net loans partially offset by increases in securities available for sale and cash and cash equivalents.

Net loans decreased 5.3% from $311.1 million at December 31, 2009 to $294.6 million at December 31, 2010. The primary contributing factor to the decrease in net loans was a decrease of $8.9 million in residential mortgage loans as the Bank continued to sell the majority of newly originated residential mortgage loans in the secondary market. The Bank originated $43.1 million in new residential mortgages for sale in the secondary market during 2010 compared to $41.8 million in 2009. These loans were originated and funded by the Bank and sold in the secondary market. Of this total, $14.8 million paid off existing loans in the Bank’s portfolio. Originating mortgage loans for sale in the secondary market allows the Bank to better manage its interest rate risk, while offering a full line of mortgage products to prospective customers. In addition to residential mortgage loans, residential construction loans and consumer loans also decreased by $4.5 million and $1.2 million, respectively, during 2010.

Securities available for sale, at fair value, consisting primarily of U. S. agency and privately-issued mortgage-backed obligations, U. S. agency notes and bonds, and municipal obligations, increased $7.1 million, from $93.7 million at December 31, 2009 to $100.9 million at December 31, 2010. Purchases of securities available for sale totaled $57.8 million in 2010. These purchases were offset by maturities of $36.9 million and principal repayments of $12.7 million. The Bank invests excess cash in securities that provide safety, liquidity and yield. Accordingly, we purchase mortgage-backed securities to provide cash flow for loan demand and deposit changes, we purchase federal agency notes for short-term yield and low risk, and municipals are purchased to improve our tax equivalent yield focusing on longer term profitability.

The investment in securities held to maturity, consisting of federal agency mortgage-backed securities and municipal obligations, decreased from $62,000 at December 31, 2009 to $32,000 at December 31, 2010. During 2010, the Bank had maturities of $21,000 and principal repayments of $9,000.

Cash and cash equivalents increased from $15.9 million at December 31, 2009 to $21.6 million at December 31, 2010. The increase is due primarily to loan repayments and an increase in deposits.

Total deposits increased 0.9%, from $374.5 million at December 31, 2009 to $378.0 million at December 31, 2010. Interest-bearing demand deposits, money market and savings accounts increased a total of $22.4 million during 2010 while time deposits decreased $19.2 million during the period. Part of the increase in interest-bearing demand deposits resulted from the Bank’s successful efforts to attract operating accounts of public entities, such as counties, cities and school corporations. Time deposits have decreased as some customers are unwilling to lock into long-term commitments while interest rates are at their current low levels. Noninterest-bearing demand deposits increased 0.7% to $40.8 million at December 31, 2010.

Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings decreased $9.0 million from $24.8 million at December 31, 2009 to $15.7 million at December 31, 2010. New advances totaling $9.5 million were drawn during the year. Principal payments on advances totaled $18.5 million during 2010.

Retail repurchase agreements, which represent overnight borrowings from business and local municipal deposit customers, increased from $7.9 million at December 31, 2009 to $8.7 million at December 31, 2010, primarily due to normal balance fluctuations.

Total stockholders’ equity attributable to the Company increased from $45.9 million at December 31, 2009 to $47.9 million at December 31, 2010. This increase is primarily the result of net income of $3.9 million and the exercise of $289,000 in stock options, offset by dividends paid of $2.1 million and repurchases of treasury stock of $43,000. During 2010 the Company repurchased 2,827 shares of its stock at a weighted average price of $14.89 per share. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had repurchased 48,585 shares of the 240,467 authorized by the Board of Directors under the current stock repurchase program which was announced in August 2008 and 377,119 shares since the original repurchase program began in 2001.

Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk including commitments to extend credit under existing lines of credit and commitments to originate loans. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated financial statements.

Off-balance-sheet financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit and interest rate risk are summarized as follows:


	At December 31,
	2010		2009
	*(In thousands)*
Commitments to originate new loans	$	7,295	$	9,734
Undisbursed portion of construction loans		3,119		4,372
Unfunded commitments to extend credit under existing commercial and personal lines of credit		34,039		32,717
Standby letters of credit		1,689		2,074

The Company does not have any special purpose entities, derivative financial instruments or other forms of off-balance-sheet financing arrangements.

Commitments to originate new loans or to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Most equity line commitments are for a term of 5 to 10 years and commercial lines of credit are generally renewable on an annual basis. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amounts of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, are based on management’s credit evaluation of the borrower.

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes information regarding the Company’s contractual obligations as of December 31, 2010:


	Payments due by period
	Total		Less than 1 Year		1 – 3 Years		3 – 5 Years		More than 5 Years
	*(In thousands)*
Deposits	$	378,003	$	333,483	$	36,523	$	7,939	$	58
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		15,729		3,379		12,350		—		—
Retail repurchase agreements		8,669		8,669		—		—		—
Operating lease obligations		64		15		30		19		—


Total contractual obligations	$	402,465	$	345,546	$	48,903	$	7,958	$	58

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity refers to the ability of a financial institution to generate sufficient cash flow to fund current loan demand, meet deposit withdrawals and pay operating expenses. The Bank’s primary sources of funds are new deposits, proceeds from loan repayments and prepayments and proceeds from the maturity of securities. The Bank may also borrow from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis. While loan repayments and maturities of securities are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and mortgage

prepayments are greatly influenced by market interest rates, general economic conditions and competition. At December 31, 2010, the Bank had cash and interest-bearing deposits with banks of $21.6 million and securities available for sale with a fair value of $100.9 million. If the Bank requires funds beyond its ability to generate them internally, it has additional borrowing capacity with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis and collateral eligible for repurchase agreements.

The Bank must maintain an adequate level of liquidity to ensure the availability of sufficient funds to support loan growth and deposit withdrawals, to satisfy financial commitments and to take advantage of investment opportunities. At December 31, 2010, the Bank had total commitments to extend credit of $44.5 million. See Note 16 in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. At December 31, 2010, the Bank had certificates of deposit scheduled to mature within one year of $81.2 million. Historically, the Bank has been able to retain a significant amount of its deposits as they mature.

The Company is a separate legal entity from the Bank and must provide for its own liquidity. In addition to its operating expenses, the Company requires funds to pay any dividends to its shareholders and to repurchase any shares of its common stock. The Company’s primary source of income is dividends received from the Bank. The amount of dividends the Bank may declare and pay to the Company in any calendar year, without the receipt of prior approval from the Office of the Thrift Supervision but with prior notice to the Office of Thrift Supervision, cannot exceed net income for that year to date plus retained net income (as defined) for the preceding two calendar years. At December 31, 2010, the Company (on an unconsolidated basis) had liquid assets of $369,000.

The Bank is required to maintain specific amounts of capital pursuant to Office of Thrift Supervision regulations. As of December 31, 2010 the Bank was in compliance with all regulatory capital requirements which were effective as of such date with tangible, core and risk-based capital ratios of 9.3%, 9.3% and 15.5%, respectively. See Note 19 in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Effect of Inflation and Changing Prices

The consolidated financial statements and related financial data presented in this report have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, which generally require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars, without considering the changes in relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The primary impact of inflation is reflected in the increased cost of the Bank’s operations. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all the assets and liabilities of the financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates generally have a more significant impact on the financial institutions performance than do general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the prices of goods and services.

Market Risk Analysis

Qualitative Aspects of Market Risk. The Bank’s principal financial objective is to achieve long-term profitability while reducing its exposure to fluctuating market interest rates. The Bank has sought to reduce the exposure of its earnings to changes in market interest rates by attempting to manage the mismatch between asset and liability maturities and interest rates. In order to reduce the exposure to interest rate fluctuations, the Bank has developed strategies to manage its liquidity, shorten its effective maturities of certain interest-earning assets and decrease the interest rate sensitivity of its asset base. Management has sought to decrease the average maturity of its assets by emphasizing the origination of short-term commercial and consumer loans, all of which are retained by the Bank for its portfolio. The Bank relies on retail deposits as its primary source of funds. Management believes retail deposits, compared to brokered deposits, reduce the effects of interest rate fluctuations because they generally represent a more stable source of funds.

Quantitative Aspects of Market Risk. The Bank does not maintain a trading account for any class of financial instrument nor does the Bank engage in hedging activities or purchase high-risk derivative instruments. Furthermore, the Bank is not subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk or commodity price risk.

The Bank uses interest rate sensitivity analysis to measure its interest rate risk by computing changes in net portfolio value (NPV) of its cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items in the event of a range of assumed changes in market interest rates. NPV represents the market value of portfolio equity and is equal to the market value of assets minus the market value of liabilities, with adjustments made for off-balance sheet items. This analysis assesses the risk of loss in market risk sensitive instruments in the event of a sudden and sustained 100 basis point decrease to a 300 basis point increase in market interest rates with no effect given to any steps that management might take to counter the effect of that interest rate movement. Using data compiled by the Office of Thrift Supervision, the Bank receives a report that measures interest rate risk by modeling the change in NPV over a variety of interest rate scenarios. This procedure for measuring interest rate risk was developed by the Office of Thrift Supervision to replace the “gap” analysis (the difference between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities that mature or reprice within a specific time period).

The following tables are provided by the Office of Thrift Supervision and set forth the change in the Bank’s NPV at December 31, 2010, based on Office of Thrift Supervision assumptions that would occur in the event of an immediate change in interest rates, with no effect given to any steps that management might take to counteract that change.


	At December 31, 2010
	Net Portfolio Value								Net Portfolio Value as a
	Dollar		Dollar			Percent			Percent of Present Value of Assets
Change In Rates	Amount		Change			Change			NPV Ratio			Change
	*(Dollars in thousands)*
300bp	$	54,193	$	(8,639	)		(14	)%		11.82	%		(151)bp
200bp		58,622		(4,210	)		(7	)		12.63			(70)bp
100bp		61,429		(1,403	)		(2	)		13.12			(21)bp
—bp		62,832		—			—			13.33			—bp
(100)bp		63,835		1,003			2			13.48			15bp

The preceding tables indicate that the Bank’s NPV would be expected to decrease in the event of a sudden and sustained increase in prevailing market interest rates and would be expected to increase in the event of a sudden and sustained decrease in prevailing market interest rates. The expected decrease in the Bank’s NPV given an increase in rates is primarily attributable to the relatively high percentage of fixed-rate loans and debt securities in the Bank’s portfolio. At December 31, 2010, approximately 50% of the loan portfolio consisted of fixed-rate loans and substantially all of the debt securities portfolio consists of fixed-rate securities.

Certain assumptions utilized by the Office of Thrift Supervision in assessing the interest rate risk of savings associations within its region were utilized in preparing the preceding tables. These assumptions relate to interest rates, loan prepayments, deposit decay rates, and the market values of certain assets under differing interest rate scenarios, among others.

As with any method of measuring interest rate risk, certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the foregoing tables. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as adjustable-rate mortgage loans, have features that restrict changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. Further, in the event of a change in interest rates, expected rates of prepayments on loans and early withdrawals from certificates of deposit could deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the tables.

ITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section captioned “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The financial statements required by this item begin on page F-1.

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective for the purpose of ensuring that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”): (1) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (2) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In addition, based on that evaluation, no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter or year ended December 31, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The internal control process has been designed under our supervision to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, utilizing the framework established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, management has determined that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010 is effective.

Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that accurately and fairly reflect, in reasonable detail, transactions and dispositions of assets; and provide reasonable assurances that: (1) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States; (2) receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the directors of the Company; and (3) unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements are prevented or timely detected.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Changes to Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

PART III

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information relating to the directors of the Company, information regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act and information regarding the audit committee and audit committee financial expert is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Executive Officers Who Are Not Directors


Name	Age⁽¹⁾	Position
M. Chris Frederick	43	Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Joel E. Voyles	57	Senior Vice President - Retail and Corporate Secretary
Dennis L. Thomas	54	Senior Vice President- Lending

(1)	As of December 31, 2010.

Biographical Information

M. Chris Frederick has been affiliated with the Bank since June 1990 and has served in his present position since 1997.

Joel E. Voyles has been affiliated with the Bank since December 1996 and has served in his present position since 1997.

Dennis L. Thomas has been affiliated with the Bank since January 2000. He was employed by Harrison County Bank from 1981 until its merger with the Bank.

Code of Ethics

The Company maintains a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct that applies to all directors, officers and employees of the Company and its affiliates. The Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is posted on the Company’s Internet website, www.firstharrison.com.

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information regarding executive compensation, compensation committee interlocks and insider participation and compensation committee report is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

(a)

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners.

Information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section captioned

“Stock Ownership” in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

(b)

Security Ownership of Management

Information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section captioned “Stock Ownership” in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

(c)

Changes in Control

Management of the Company knows of no arrangements, including any pledge by any person or securities of the Company, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the registrant.

(d)

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Equity Compensation Plan Information as of December 31, 2010


Plan category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a)		Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b)		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders		—		—		223,000
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		—		—		—
Total		—		—		223,000

The Company does not maintain any equity compensation plans that have not been approved by security holders.

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTORS INDEPENDENCE

The information relating to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information relating to the principal accountant fees and expenses is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

PART IV

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(1)	The financial statements required in response to this item are incorporated by reference from Item 8 of this report.

(2)	All financial statement schedules are omitted as the required information either is not required or applicable, or the required information is contained in the financial statements or related notes.

(3)

Exhibits


3.1		Articles of Incorporation of First Capital, Inc. (1)

3.2		Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of First Capital, Inc. (2)

10.1		*Employment Agreement with Samuel E. Uhl (4)

10.2		*Employment Agreement with M. Chris Frederick (4)

10.3		*Employment Agreement with Joel E. Voyles (4)

10.4		*Employee Severance Compensation Plan (3)

10.5		*First Federal Bank, A Federal Savings Bank 1994 Stock Option Plan (as assumed by First Capital, Inc. effective December 31, 1998) (5)

10.6		*First Capital, Inc. 1999 Stock-Based Incentive Plan (6)

10.7		*1998 Officers’ and Key Employees’ Stock Option Plan for HCB Bancorp (6)

10.8		*First Capital, Inc.2010 Equity Incentive Plan (7)

10.9		*Employment Agreement with William W. Harrod (4)

10.10		*Director Deferred Compensation Agreement between First Federal Savings & Loan Association and James Pendleton (8)

10.11		*Director Deferred Compensation Agreement between First Federal Savings & Loan Association and Gerald Uhl (8)

10.12		*Director Deferred Compensation Agreement between First Federal Savings & Loan Association and Mark Shireman (8)

10.13		*Director Deferred Compensation Agreement between First Federal Savings & Loan Association and John Buschemeyer (8)

11.0		Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings (incorporated by reference to Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K)

21.0		Subsidiaries of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Part I, “Business—Subsidiary Activities” of this Form 10-K)

23.0		Consent of Monroe Shine and Co., Inc.

31.1		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer

31.2		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer

32.0		Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer

*	Management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.

(1)	Incorporated by reference from the Exhibits filed with the Registration Statement on Form SB-2, and any amendments thereto, Registration No. 333-63515.

(2)	Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 22, 2007.

(3)	Incorporated by reference to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 1998.

(4)	Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1999.

(5)	Incorporated by reference from the Exhibits filed with the Registration Statement on Form S-8, and any amendments thereto, Registration Statement No. 333-76543.

(6)	Incorporated by reference from the Exhibits filed with the Registration Statement on Form S-8, and any amendments thereto, Registration Statement No. 333-95987.

(7)	Incorporated by reference to the appendix to the Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 9, 2010.

(8)	Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Stockholders

First Capital, Inc.

Corydon, Indiana

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of First Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of First Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

LOGO

New Albany, Indiana

March 17, 2011

F-1

MONROE SHINE & CO., INC. ¿ CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS AND BUSINESS CONSULTANTS

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009


*(In thousands, except share and per share data)*	2010			2009
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	10,463		$	10,430
Interest bearing deposits with banks		2,496			5,427
Federal funds sold		8,616			—

Total cash and cash equivalents		21,575			15,857

Securities available for sale, at fair value		100,851			93,729
Securities-held to maturity		32			62
Loans, net		294,550			311,092
Loans held for sale		4,375			1,463
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost		3,194			3,551
Foreclosed real estate		591			877
Premises and equipment		10,992			11,591
Accrued interest receivable		1,894			2,054
Cash value of life insurance		5,789			5,572
Goodwill		5,386			5,386
Core deposit intangibles		98			171
Other assets		3,051			4,129


Total Assets	$	452,378		$	455,534


LIABILITIES
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing	$	40,774		$	40,473
Interest-bearing		337,229			334,003

Total deposits		378,003			374,476

Retail repurchase agreements		8,669			7,949
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		15,729			24,776
Accrued interest payable		649			980
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		1,324			1,297

Total liabilities		404,374			409,478


Commitments and Contingencies

EQUITY
Preferred stock of $.01 par value per share
Authorized 1,000,000 shares; none issued		—			—
Common stock of $.01 par value per share
Authorized 5,000,000 shares; issued 3,164,420 shares (3,136,207 shares in 2009)		32			31
Additional paid-in capital		24,313			24,025
Retained earnings-substantially restricted		30,442			28,640
Accumulated other comprehensive income		391			490
Less treasury stock, at cost - 377,119 shares (374,292 shares in 2009)		(7,285	)		(7,242	)

Total First Capital, Inc. stockholders’ equity		47,893			45,944


Noncontrolling interest in subsidiary		111			112

Total equity		48,004			46,056


Total Liabilities and Equity	$	452,378		$	455,534

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-2

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009


*(In thousands, except per share data)*	2010		2009
INTEREST INCOME
Loans, including fees	$	18,607	$	19,586
Securities:
Taxable		2,068		2,276
Tax-exempt		1,060		1,004
Federal Home Loan Bank dividends		64		78
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits in banks		35		25

Total interest income		21,834		22,969


INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits		4,419		6,095
Retail repurchase agreements		73		51
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		1,010		2,242

Total interest expense		5,502		8,388


Net interest income		16,332		14,581
Provision for loan losses		2,037		4,289

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		14,295		10,292


NONINTEREST INCOME
Service charges on deposit accounts		2,726		2,401
Commission and fee income		132		132
Gain on sale of mortgage loans		739		529
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance		217		221
Other income		92		90

Total noninterest income		3,906		3,373


NONINTEREST EXPENSE
Compensation and benefits		7,019		6,624
Occupancy and equipment		1,373		1,370
Data processing		810		1,249
Professional fees		654		726
Advertising		208		245
Deposit insurance premiums		637		940
Other expenses		2,061		2,319

Total noninterest expense		12,762		13,473


Income before income taxes		5,439		192
Income tax expense (benefit)		1,561		(586	)


Net Income		3,878		778

Less net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest in subsidiary		13		12


Net Income Attributable to First Capital, Inc.	$	3,865	$	766


Earnings per common share attributable to First Capital, Inc.
Basic	$	1.39	$	0.28

Diluted	$	1.39	$	0.28


Dividends per share on common shares	$	0.74	$	0.72

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-3

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009


*(In thousands, except share and per share data)*	Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income			Treasury Stock			Noncontrolling Interest			Total
Balances at January 1, 2009	$	31	$	23,969		$	29,868		$	270		$	(6,616	)	$	—		$	47,522
Issuance of preferred shares to noncontrolling interest		—		(22	)		—			—			—			105			83

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Net income		—		—			766			—			—			12			778
Other comprehensive income:
Change in unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of deferred income tax expense of $ 116		—		—			—			220			—			—			220
Less: Reclassification adjustment		—		—			—			—			—			—			—
Total comprehensive income																			998

Cash dividends		—		—			(1,994	)		—			—			(5	)		(1,999	)
Stock options exercised		—		78			—			—			—			—			78
Purchase of 40,320 treasury shares		—		—			—			—			(626	)		—			(626	)


Balances at December 31, 2009		31		24,025			28,640			490			(7,242	)		112			46,056

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Net income		—		—			3,865			—			—			12			3,877
Other comprehensive income:
Change in unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of deferred income tax benefit of $72		—		—			—			(99	)		—			—			(99	)
Less: Reclassification adjustment		—		—			—			—			—			—			—
Total comprehensive income																			3,778

Cash dividends		—		—			(2,063	)		—			—			(13	)		(2,076	)
Stock options exercised		1		288			—			—			—			—			289
Purchase of 2,827 treasury shares		—		—			—			—			(43	)		—			(43	)


Balances at December 31, 2010	$	32	$	24,313		$	30,442		$	391		$	(7,285	)	$	111		$	48,004

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-4

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009


*(In thousands)*	2010			2009
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	3,878		$	778
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash and cash equivalents provided by operating activities:
Amortization of premium and accretion of discount on securities, net		908			596
Depreciation and amortization expense		899			975
Deferred income taxes		149			(939	)
Increase in cash value of life insurance		(217	)		(221	)
Provision for loan losses		2,037			4,289
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans		40,962			42,096
Mortgage loans originated for sale		(43,135	)		(41,786	)
Net gain on sale of mortgage loans		(739	)		(529	)
Decrease in accrued interest receivable		160			276
Decrease in accrued interest payable		(331	)		(435	)
Net change in other assets/liabilities		1,035			(2,501	)

Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities		5,606			2,599


CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of securities available for sale		(57,770	)		(41,614	)
Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale		36,866			16,375
Proceeds from maturities of securities held to maturity		21			20
Principal collected on mortgage-backed obligations		12,711			13,988
Net decrease in loans receivable		13,221			5,912
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed real estate		1,570			1,096
Proceeds from redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock		357			—
Purchase of premises and equipment		(227	)		(1,132	)

Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Investing Activities		6,749			(5,355	)


CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net increase in deposits		3,527			18,585
Net increase in retail repurchase agreements		720			3,397
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		9,500			—
Repayment of advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		(18,547	)		(23,054	)
Issuance of preferred shares to noncontrolling interest		—			83
Exercise of stock options		282			78
Purchase of treasury stock		(43	)		(626	)
Dividends paid		(2,076	)		(1,999	)

Net Cash Used In Financing Activities		(6,637	)		(3,536	)


Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents		5,718			(6,292	)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		15,857			22,149


Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year	$	21,575		$	15,857

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-5

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1)	SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Operations

First Capital, Inc. (the Company) is the thrift holding company of First Harrison Bank (the Bank), a wholly-owned subsidiary. The Bank is a federally-chartered savings bank which provides a variety of banking services to individuals and business customers through thirteen locations in southern Indiana. The Bank’s primary source of revenue is real estate mortgage loans. The Bank originates mortgage loans for sale in the secondary market and also serves as a broker selling non-deposit investment products through a financial services division. First Harrison Investments, Inc. and First Harrison Holdings, Inc. are wholly-owned Nevada corporate subsidiaries of the Bank that jointly own First Harrison, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company that holds and manages an investment securities portfolio. First Harrison REIT, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of First Harrison Holdings, Inc. which holds a portion of the Bank’s real estate mortgage loan portfolio.

The Company has evaluated subsequent events for potential recognition and disclosure through the date the consolidated financial statements were issued.

Basis of Consolidation and Reclassifications

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries and have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and conform to general practices in the banking industry. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

Statements of Cash Flows

For purposes of the statements of cash flows, the Company considers all cash, amounts due from depository institutions and federal funds sold to be cash and cash equivalents.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses and the valuation of real estate acquired in connection with foreclosures or in satisfaction of loans. In connection with the determination of the allowance for loan losses and foreclosed real estate, management obtains independent appraisals for significant properties.

A majority of the Bank’s loan portfolio consists of single-family residential and commercial real estate loans in the southern Indiana area. Accordingly, the ultimate collectability of a substantial portion of the Bank’s loan portfolio and the recovery of the carrying amount of foreclosed real estate are susceptible to changes in local market conditions.

While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, further reductions in the carrying amounts of loans may be necessary based on changes in local economic conditions. In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the estimated losses on loans. Such agencies may require the Bank to recognize additional losses based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination. Because of these factors, it is reasonably possible that the estimated losses on loans may change materially in the near term. However, the amount of the change that is reasonably possible cannot be estimated.

F-6

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(1 - continued)

Investment Securities

Securities Available for Sale: Securities available for sale consist primarily of mortgage-backed and other debt securities and are stated at fair value. The Company holds mortgage-backed securities issued by the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA), a U.S. government agency, and the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), government-sponsored enterprises, as well as privately-issued collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) and other mortgage-backed securities. Mortgage-backed securities represent participating interests in pools of long-term first mortgage loans originated and serviced by issuers of the securities. CMOs are complex mortgage-backed securities that restructure the cash flows and risks of the underlying mortgage collateral. The Company also holds debt securities issued by government-sponsored agencies, municipal bonds and mutual funds. Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts are recognized in interest income using methods approximating the interest method over the period to maturity, adjusted for anticipated prepayments. Unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, on securities available for sale are included in other comprehensive income and the accumulated unrealized holding gains and losses are reported as a separate component of equity until realized. Realized gains and losses on the sale of securities available for sale are determined using the specific identification method and are included in other noninterest income and, when applicable, are reported as a reclassification adjustment, net of tax, in other comprehensive income.

Securities Held to Maturity: Debt securities for which the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are reported at cost, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount that are recognized in interest income using methods approximating the interest method over the period to maturity, adjusted for anticipated prepayments. The Company classifies certain mortgage-backed securities and municipal obligations as held to maturity.

Declines in the fair value of individual available for sale and held to maturity securities below their amortized cost that are other than temporary result in write-downs of the individual securities to their fair value. The related write-downs are included in earnings as realized losses. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than amortized cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of the Bank to retain its investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.

Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses

Loans are stated at unpaid principal balances, less net deferred loan fees and the allowance for loan losses. The Bank grants real estate mortgage, commercial business and consumer loans. A substantial portion of the loan portfolio is represented by mortgage loans to customers in southern Indiana. The ability of the Bank’s customers to honor their contracts is dependent upon the real estate and general economic conditions in this area.

Loan origination and commitment fees, as well as certain direct costs of underwriting and closing loans, are deferred and amortized as a yield adjustment to interest income over the lives of the related loans using the interest method. Amortization of net deferred loan fees is discontinued when a loan is placed on nonaccrual status.

F-7

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(1 - continued)

The recognition of income on a loan is discontinued and previously accrued interest is reversed, when interest or principal payments become ninety (90) days past due unless, in the opinion of management, the outstanding interest remains collectible. Past due status is determined based on contractual terms. Generally, by applying the cash receipts method, interest income is subsequently recognized only as received until the loan is returned to accrual status. The cash receipts method is used when the likelihood of further loss on the loan is remote. Otherwise, the Bank applies the cost recovery method and applies all payments as a reduction of the unpaid principal balance until the loan qualifies for return to accrual status. A loan is restored to accrual status when all principal and interest payments are brought current and the borrower has demonstrated the ability to make future payments of principal and interest as scheduled. The Bank’s practice is to charge off any loan or portion of a loan when the loan is determined by management to be uncollectible due to the borrower’s failure to meet repayment terms, the borrower’s deteriorating or deteriorated financial condition, the depreciation of the underlying collateral, the loans classification as a loss by regulatory examiners, or for other reasons.

The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon management’s periodic review of the collectibility of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral, and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.

The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are classified as doubtful, substandard, or special mention. For such loans that are also classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers non-classified loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

F-8

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(1 - continued)

Foreclosed Real Estate

Foreclosed real estate includes both formally foreclosed property and in-substance foreclosed property held for sale. In-substance foreclosed properties are those properties for which the institution has taken physical possession, regardless of whether formal foreclosure proceedings have taken place.

At the time of foreclosure, foreclosed real estate is recorded at fair value less estimated costs to sell, which becomes the property’s new basis. Any write-downs based on the property’s fair value at the date of acquisition are charged to the allowance for loan losses. After foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and property held for sale is carried at the lower of the new cost basis or fair value less cost to sell. Costs incurred in maintaining foreclosed real estate and subsequent impairment adjustments to the carrying amount of a property, if any, are included in other noninterest expense.

Premises and Equipment

Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. The Company uses the straight line method of computing depreciation at rates adequate to amortize the cost of the applicable assets over their estimated useful lives. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. The cost and related accumulated depreciation of assets sold, or otherwise disposed of, are removed from the related accounts and any gain or loss is included in earnings.

Goodwill and Other Intangibles

Goodwill recognized in a business combination represents the excess of the cost of the acquired entity over the net of the amounts assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill is carried at its implied fair value and is evaluated for possible impairment at least annually or more frequently upon the occurrence of an event or change in circumstances that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount. Such circumstances could include, but are not limited to: (1) a significant adverse change in legal factors or in business climate, (2) unanticipated competition, or (3) an adverse action or assessment by a regulator. If the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in earnings equal to that excess amount. The loss recognized cannot exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. After a goodwill impairment loss is recognized, the adjusted carrying amount of goodwill is its new accounting basis.

Other intangible assets consist of acquired core deposit intangibles. Core deposit intangibles are amortized over the estimated economic lives of the acquired core deposits. The carrying amount of core deposit intangibles and the remaining estimated economic life are evaluated annually or whenever events or circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable or the remaining period of amortization requires revision. After an impairment loss is recognized, the adjusted carrying amount of the intangible asset is its new accounting basis.

Mortgage Banking Activities

Mortgage loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or market value. Aggregate market value is determined based on the quoted prices under a “best efforts” sales agreement with a third party. Net unrealized losses are recognized through a valuation allowance by charges to income. Realized gains on sales of mortgage loans are included in noninterest income. Mortgage loans are sold with servicing released.

F-9

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(1 - continued)

Mortgage Banking Activities - continued

Commitments to originate mortgage loans held for sale are considered derivative financial instruments to be accounted for at fair value. The Bank’s mortgage loan commitments subject to derivative accounting are fixed-rate mortgage loan commitments at market rates when initiated. At December 31, 2010, the Bank had commitments to originate $670,000 in fixed-rate mortgage loans intended for sale in the secondary market after the loans are closed. Fair value is estimated based on fees that would be charged on commitments with similar terms.

Cash Surrender Value of Life Insurance

The Bank has purchased life insurance policies on certain directors, officers and key employees to help offset costs associated with the Bank’s compensation and benefit programs. Bank-owned life insurance is recorded at the amount that can be realized under the insurance contracts at the balance sheet date, which is the cash surrender value adjusted for other charges or other amounts due that are probable at settlement.

Income Taxes

When income tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while other positions are subject to some degree of uncertainty regarding the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be sustained. The Company recognizes the benefits of a tax position in the consolidated financial statements of the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more-likely-than-not (more than 50 percent probable) that the tax position would be sustained upon examination. Income tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not threshold are measured as the largest amount of income tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits associated with the income tax positions claimed on income tax returns that exceeds the amount measured as described above is reflected as a liability for unrecognized income tax benefits in the consolidated balance sheet, along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities, if there were an examination. Interest and penalties associated with unrecognized income tax benefits are classified as additional income taxes in the statement of income.

Income taxes are provided for the tax effects of the transactions reported in the financial statements and consist of taxes currently due plus deferred income taxes. Income tax reporting and financial statement reporting rules differ in many respects. As a result, there will often be a difference between the carrying amount of an asset or liability as presented in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the amount that would be recognized as the tax basis of the same asset or liability computed based on the effects of tax positions recognized, as described in the preceding paragraph. These differences are referred to as temporary differences because they are expected to reverse in future years. Deferred income tax assets are recognized for temporary differences where their future reversal will result in future tax benefits. Deferred income tax assets are also recognized for the future tax benefits expected to be realized from net operating loss or tax credit carryforwards. Deferred income tax liabilities are recognized for temporary differences where their future reversal will result in the payment of future income taxes. Deferred income tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are reflected at income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax assets or liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income taxes.

F-10

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(1 - continued)

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has adopted the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based compensation prescribed in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 718 for its stock plans.

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are charged to operations when incurred.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The following are summaries of recently issued accounting pronouncements that impact the accounting and reporting practices of the Company:

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued two standards which change the way entities account for securitizations and special-purpose entities: Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets (ASC Topic 860) and SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (ASC Topic 810). SFAS No. 166 is a revision to SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, and requires more information about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions, and where entities have continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. This statement eliminates the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity,” changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and requires additional disclosures. SFAS No. 167 is a revision to FASB Interpretation No. 46 (Revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, and changes how a reporting entity determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. The determination of whether a reporting entity is required to consolidate another entity is based on, among other things, the other entity’s purpose and design and the reporting entity’s ability to direct the activities of the other entity that most significantly impact the other entity’s economic performance. These new standards require a number of new disclosures. SFAS No. 167 requires a reporting entity to provide additional disclosures about its involvement with variable interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. A reporting entity will be required to disclose how its involvement with a variable interest entity affects the reporting entity’s financial statements. SFAS No. 166 enhances information reported to users of financial statements by providing greater transparency about transfers of financial assets and an entity’s continuing involvement in transferred financial assets. These statements are effective at the beginning of a reporting entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2009. Early application was not permitted. The adoption of these statements did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) – Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This ASU provides amendments to ASC Topic 820 to provide users of financial statements with additional information regarding fair value. New disclosures required by the ASU include disclosures of significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 and the reasons for such transfers, disclosure of the reasons for transfers in or out of Level 3 and that significant transfers into Level 3 be disclosed separately from significant transfers out of Level 3, and disclosure of the valuation techniques used in connection with Level 2 and Level 3 valuations and the reason for any changes in valuation methods. This ASU will generally be effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009. However, disclosures of purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward activity in Level 3 fair value measurements will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. As this ASU applies only to disclosures, the adoption of this ASU had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

F-11

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(1 - continued)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements – continued

In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09, Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements. The ASU requires Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filers to evaluate subsequent events through the date the financial statements are issued and removes the requirement for SEC filers to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. The FASB believes these amendments alleviate potential conflicts with the SEC’s requirements. The ASU was effective upon issuance for the Company. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-18, Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan Is Part of a Pool That Is Accounted for as a Single Asset (Topic 310). Under the amendments, modifications of loans that are accounted for within pools under Subtopic 310-30 do not result in the removal of those loans from the pool even if the modification of those loans would otherwise be considered a troubled debt restructuring. An entity will continue to be required to consider whether the pool of assets in which the loan is included is impaired if expected cash flows for the pool change. However, loans within the scope of Subtopic 310-30 that are accounted for individually will continue to be subject to the troubled debt restructuring accounting provisions. The ASU is effective for modifications of loans accounted for within pools under subtopic 310-30 occurring in the first interim or annual period ending after July 15, 2010. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. The guidance requires additional disclosure to facilitate financial statement users’ evaluation of the following: (1) the nature of credit risk inherent in the entity’s loan portfolio, (2) how that risk is analyzed and assessed in arriving at the allowance for loan losses, and (3) the changes and reasons for those changes in the allowance for loan losses. For public companies, increased disclosures as of the end of a reporting period are effective for periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. Increased disclosures about activity that occurs during a reporting period are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. ASU No. 2011-01 issued in January 2011 delayed the effective date of the disclosures about troubled debt restructurings required by ASU No. 2010-20 for public companies, so that the new disclosures about troubled debt restructurings could be coordinated with additional guidance for determining what constitutes a troubled debt restructuring expected to be issued in 2011. As this ASU applies only to disclosures, the adoption of this ASU had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-28, When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero Carrying Amounts, which amended ASC Topic 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other. The guidance modifies the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. For public companies, this amendment is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

(2)	RESTRICTION ON CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS

The Bank is required to maintain reserve balances on hand and with the Federal Reserve Bank which are noninterest bearing and unavailable for investment. The average amount of those reserve balances for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $1.3 million.

F-12

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(3)	INVESTMENT SECURITIES

Debt and equity securities have been classified in the balance sheets according to management’s intent. Investment securities at December 31, 2010 and 2009 are summarized as follows:


*(In thousands)*	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
December 31, 2010:
Securities available for sale:
Agency mortgage-backed securities	$	12,101	$	580	$	—	$	12,681
Agency CMO		11,987		46		65		11,968
Privately-issued CMO		1,688		10		46		1,652
Other debt securities:
Agency notes and bonds		42,400		297		317		42,380
Municipal obligations		29,366		371		281		29,456

Subtotal – debt securities		97,542		1,304		709		98,137


Mutual funds		2,705		36		27		2,714


Total securities available for sale	$	100,247	$	1,340	$	736	$	100,851


Securities held to maturity:
Agency mortgage-backed securities	$	18	$	—	$	—	$	18
Municipal obligations		14		—		—		14


Total securities held to maturity	$	32	$	—	$	—	$	32


December 31, 2009:
Securities available for sale:
Agency mortgage-backed securities	$	17,757	$	625	$	5	$	18,377
Agency CMO		5,314		121		—		5,435
Privately-issued CMO		2,357		—		322		2,035
Other debt securities:
Agency notes and bonds		36,565		231		187		36,609
Municipal obligations		28,166		486		160		28,492

Subtotal – debt securities		90,159		1,463		674		90,948


Mutual funds		2,794		35		48		2,781


Total securities available for sale	$	92,953	$	1,498	$	722	$	93,729


Securities held to maturity:
Agency mortgage-backed securities	$	27	$	—	$	—	$	27
Municipal obligations		35		2		—		37


Total securities held to maturity	$	62	$	2	$	—	$	64

F-13

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(3 - continued)

The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities as of December 31, 2010, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities of mortgage-backed securities may differ from contractual maturities because the mortgages underlying the obligations may be prepaid without penalty.


	Securities Available for Sale				Securities Held to Maturity
*(In thousands)*	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	1,518	$	1,529	$	14	$	14
Due after one year through five years		16,831		17,034		—		—
Due after five years through ten years		12,231		12,359		—		—
Due after ten years		41,186		40,914		—		—

		71,766		71,836		14		14

Mortgage-backed securities and CMO		25,776		26,301		18		18


	$	97,542	$	98,137	$	32	$	32

At December 31, 2010, available for sale debt securities with an amortized cost and fair value of $1.0 million were pledged to secure public deposits. Certain other investment securities were pledged under retail repurchase agreements and to secure Federal Home Loan Bank advances at December 31, 2010. (See Notes 9 and 10)

Information pertaining to investment securities available for sale with gross unrealized losses at December 31, 2010, aggregated by investment category and the length of time that individual investment securities have been in a continuous loss position, follows:


*(Dollars in thousands)*	Number of Investment Positions		Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
Continuous loss position less than twelve months:
Agency CMO		7	$	7,547	$	65
Agency notes and bonds		12		11,765		317
Municipal obligations		31		11,463		236


Total less than twelve months		50		30,775		618


Continuous loss position more than twelve months:
Privately-issued CMO		2		756		46
Municipal obligations		1		390		45
Mutual fund		1		336		27


Total more than twelve months		4		1,482		118


Total securities available for sale		54	$	32,257	$	736

At December 31, 2010, the Company did not have any securities held to maturity with an unrealized loss. Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least quarterly, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.

F-14

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(3 - continued)

At December 31, 2010, the 51 U.S. government agency debt securities, including mortgage-backed securities and CMO, and municipal obligations in a loss position had depreciated approximately 2.1% from the amortized cost basis. All of the U.S. government agency securities and municipal obligations are issued by U.S. government agencies, government-sponsored enterprises and municipal governments, or are secured by first mortgage loans and municipal project revenues. These unrealized losses related principally to current interest rates for similar types of securities. In analyzing an issuer’s financial condition, management considers whether the securities are issued by the federal government, its agencies or other governments, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, and the results of reviews of the issuer’s financial condition. As the Company has the ability to hold the U.S. government agency debt securities and municipal obligations until maturity, or for the foreseeable future if classified as available for sale, no declines are deemed to be other-than-temporary.

At December 31, 2010, the two privately-issued CMO in a loss position had depreciated approximately 5.7% from the amortized cost basis. The Company evaluates the existence of a potential credit loss component related to the decline in fair value of the privately-issued CMO portfolio each quarter using an independent third party analysis. At December 31, 2010, the Company holds one privately-issued CMO with an amortized cost of $711,000 and a fair value of $668,000 that was downgraded to a substandard regulatory classification in 2009 due to a downgrade of the security’s credit quality rating by various rating agencies. Based on the independent third party analysis performed in December 2010, the Bank expects to collect the contractual principal and interest cash flows for this security, and, as a result, no other-than-temporary impairment has been recognized. While management does not anticipate a credit-related impairment loss at December 31, 2010, additional deterioration in market and economic conditions may have an adverse impact on the credit quality in the future.

(4)	LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

Loans at December 31, 2010 and 2009 consisted of the following:


*(In thousands)*	2010			2009
Real estate mortgage loans:
Residential	$	130,143		$	139,085
Land		9,534			10,288
Residential construction		8,151			13,862
Commercial real estate		59,901			59,741
Commercial real estate construction		—			839
Commercial business loans		21,911			22,861
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage loans		43,046			46,360
Automobile loans		19,384			17,714
Loans secured by savings accounts		1,042			1,361
Unsecured loans		3,076			2,677
Other consumer loans		5,732			5,321

Gross loans		301,920			320,109


Deferred loan origination fees, net		222			286
Undisbursed portion of loans in process		(3,119	)		(4,372	)
Allowance for loan losses		(4,473	)		(4,931	)


Loans, net	$	294,550		$	311,092

F-15

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(4 - continued)

At December 31, 2010, residential mortgage loans secured by residential properties without private mortgage insurance or government guarantee and with loan-to-value ratios exceeding 90% amounted to approximately $5.5 million.

Mortgage loans serviced for the benefit of others amounted to $279,000 and $310,000 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

The Bank has entered into loan transactions with certain directors, officers and their affiliates (i.e., related parties). In the opinion of management, such indebtedness was incurred in the ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms, including interest rate and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unrelated persons.

The following table represents the aggregate activity for related party loans during the year ended December 31, 2010. The beginning balance has been adjusted to reflect new directors and officers, as well as directors and officers that are no longer with the Company.


*(In thousands)*
Beginning balance, as adjusted	$	8,173
New loans		7,480
Payments		(9,711	)


Ending balance	$	5,942

A director of the Bank is a shareholder of a farm implement dealership that contracts with the Bank to provide sales financing to the dealership’s customers. In the opinion of management, these transactions were made in the ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms, including interest rate and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unrelated parties. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Bank purchased approximately $753,000 of loans to customers of the corporation and the aggregate outstanding balance of all loans purchased from the corporation was approximately $1.4 million and $1.6 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

F-16

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(4 - continued)

The following table provides the components of the Company’s recorded investment in loans for each portfolio segment at December 31, 2010 and 2009:


	Residential Real Estate		Land		Total Construction		Commercial Real Estate		Commercial Business		Home Equity and Second Mortgage		Other Consumer		Total
	(In thousands)
December 31, 2010:
Principal loan balance	$	130,143	$	9,534	$	5,032	$	59,901	$	21,911	$	43,046	$	29,234	$	298,801

Accrued interest receivable		480		54		16		174		68		171		199		1,162

Net deferred loan origination fees and costs		91		1		—		10		—		120		—		222


Recorded investment in loans	$	130,714	$	9,589	$	5,048	$	60,085	$	21,979	$	43,337	$	29,433	$	300,185


December 31, 2009:
Principal loan balance	$	139,085	$	10,288	$	10,329	$	59,741	$	22,861	$	46,360	$	27,073	$	315,737

Accrued interest receivable		561		47		42		174		77		181		183		1,265

Net deferred loan origination fees and costs		109		2		—		11		—		164		—		286


Recorded investment in loans	$	139,755	$	10,337	$	10,371	$	59,926	$	22,938	$	46,705	$	27,256	$	317,288

F-17

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(4 - continued)

An analysis of the allowance for loan losses and recorded investment in loans as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010 is as follows:


	Residential Real Estate			Land			Total Construction			Commercial Real Estate			Commercial Business			Home Equity and Second Mortgage			Other Consumer			Total
	(In thousands)
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Beginning balance	$	1,208		$	121		$	107		$	1,633		$	1,264		$	217		$	381		$	4,931
Provisions		427			(6	)		(86	)		680			7			648			367			2,037
Charge-offs		(620	)		(61	)		—			(1,265	)		(29	)		(299	)		(457	)		(2,731	)
Recoveries		9			1			—			3			9			40			174			236


Ending balance	$	1,024		$	55		$	21		$	1,051		$	1,251		$	606		$	465		$	4,473


Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	458		$	—		$	—		$	607		$	1,089		$	338		$	—		$	2,492

Collectively evaluated for impairment		566			55			21			444			162			268			465			1,981

Acquired with deteriorated credit quality		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—


Ending balance	$	1,024		$	55		$	21		$	1,051		$	1,251		$	606		$	465		$	4,473


Recorded Investment in Loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	3,285		$	—		$	279		$	1,780		$	2,168		$	398		$	17		$	7,927

Collectively evaluated for impairment		127,429			9,589			4,769			58,305			19,811			42,939			29,416			292,258

Acquired with deteriorated credit quality		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—


Ending balance	$	130,714		$	9,589		$	5,048		$	60,085		$	21,979		$	43,337		$	29,433		$	300,185

F-18

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(4 - continued)

An analysis of the allowance for loan losses and recorded investment in loans as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009 is as follows:


	Residential Real Estate			Land			Total Construction		Commercial Real Estate			Commercial Business			Home Equity and Second Mortgage			Other Consumer			Total
	(In thousands)
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Beginning balance	$	596		$	39		$	20	$	695		$	239		$	230		$	843		$	2,662
Provisions		1,011			107			87		1,827			1,192			175			(110	)		4,289
Charge-offs		(425	)		(25	)		—		(895	)		(181	)		(209	)		(540	)		(2,275	)
Recoveries		26			—			—		6			14			21			188			255


Ending balance	$	1,208		$	121		$	107	$	1,633		$	1,264		$	217		$	381		$	4,931


Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:

Individually evaluated for impairment	$	542		$	73		$	—	$	1,379		$	1,110		$	84		$	—		$	3,188

Collectively evaluated for impairment		666			48			107		254			154			133			381			1,743

Acquired with deteriorated credit quality		—			—			—		—			—			—			—			—


Ending balance	$	1,208		$	121		$	107	$	1,633		$	1,264		$	217		$	381		$	4,931


Recorded Investment in Loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	2,696		$	388		$	162	$	3,259		$	2,238		$	718		$	55		$	9,516

Collectively evaluated for impairment		137,059			9,949			10,209		56,667			20,700			45,987			27,201			307,772

Acquired with deteriorated credit quality		—			—			—		—			—			—			—			—


Ending balance	$	139,755		$	10,337		$	10,371	$	59,926		$	22,938		$	46,705		$	27,256		$	317,288

F-19

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(4 - continued)

The following table summarizes the Company’s impaired loans by class of loans as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010:


			Unpaid				Average		Interest		Interest
	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Income		Recognized –
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		Recognized		Cash Method
	(In thousands)
Loans with no related allowance recorded:
Residential real estate	$	1,037	$	1,026	$	—	$	1,225	$	11	$	5
Land		—		—		—		118		3		2
Total construction		—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial real estate		398		398		—		1,146		2		1
Commercial business		20		20		—		18		2		1
Home equity and second mortgage		25		25		—		165		1		—
Other consumer		17		17		—		60		2		1


		1,497		1,486		—		2,732		21		10


Loans with an allowance recorded:
Residential real estate		2,248		2,244		458		1,630		7		4
Land		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total construction		279		279		—		140		—		—
Commercial real estate		1,382		1,382		607		963		—		—
Commercial business		2,148		2,148		1,089		2,190		—		—
Home equity and second mortgage		373		373		338		347		—		2
Other consumer		—		—		—		—		—		—


		6,430		6,426		2,492		5,270		7		6


Total:
Residential real estate		3,285		3,270		458		2,855		18		9
Land		—		—		—		118		3		2
Total construction		279		279		—		140		—		—
Commercial real estate		1,780		1,780		607		2,109		2		1
Commercial business		2,168		2,168		1,089		2,208		2		1
Home equity and second mortgage		398		398		338		512		1		2
Other consumer		17		17		—		60		2		1


	$	7,927	$	7,912	$	2,492	$	8,002	$	28	$	16

F-20

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(4 - continued)

The following table summarizes the Company’s impaired loans by class of loans as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009:


	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Interest Recognized – Cash Method
					(In thousands)
Loans with no related allowance recorded:
Residential real estate	$	1,083	$	1,071	$	—	$	1,563	$	40	$	27
Land		295		295		—		173		4		5
Total construction		162		160		—		110		3		4
Commercial real estate		502		503		—		1,260		3		3
Commercial business		—		—		—		34		1		—
Home equity and second mortgage		525		520		—		312		5		2
Other consumer		55		55		—		64		5		4

		2,622		2,604		—		3,516		61		45

Loans with an allowance recorded:
Residential real estate		1,613		1,608		542		1,409		15		3
Land		94		94		73		70		—		—
Total construction		—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial real estate		2,756		2,755		1,379		2,154		—		—
Commercial business		2,238		2,238		1,110		1,603		—		—
Home equity and second mortgage		193		193		84		177		1		—
Other consumer		—		—		—		—		—		—

		6,894		6,888		3,188		5,413		16		3

Total:
Residential real estate		2,696		2,679		542		2,972		55		30
Land		389		389		73		243		4		5
Total construction		162		160		—		110		3		4
Commercial real estate		3,258		3,258		1,379		3,414		3		3
Commercial business		2,238		2,238		1,110		1,637		1		—
Home equity and second mortgage		718		713		84		489		6		2
Other consumer		55		55		—		64		5		4

	$	9,516	$	9,492	$	3,188	$	8,929	$	77	$	48

Impaired loans includes modified loans that are considered to be troubled debt restructurings, which are evaluated for impairment giving consideration to the impact of the modified terms on the present value of the loan’s expected cash flows. Troubled debt restructurings totaled $3.9 million at December 31, 2010 and the related allowance for loan losses on troubled debt restructurings was $1.5 million at December 31, 2010.

F-21

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(4 - continued)

Nonperforming loans consists of nonaccrual loans and loans over 90 days past due and still accruing interest. The following table presents the recorded investment in nonperforming loans by class of loans at December 31, 2010 and 2009:


	December 31, 2010						December 31, 2009
	Nonaccrual Loans		Loans 90+ Days Past Due Still Accruing		Total Nonperforming Loans		Nonaccrual Loans		Loans 90+ Days Past Due Still Accruing		Total Nonperforming Loans
	(In thousands)
Residential real estate	$	2,951	$	334	$	3,285	$	2,295	$	401	$	2,696
Land		—		—		—		261		127		388
Total construction		279		—		279		—		162		162
Commercial real estate		1,780		—		1,780		3,184		75		3,259
Commercial business		2,148		20		2,168		2,238		—		2,238
Home equity and second mortgage		390		8		398		456		262		718
Other consumer		—		17		17		—		55		55

Total	$	7,548	$	379	$	7,927	$	8,434	$	1,082	$	9,516

The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment loans by class of loans at December 31, 2010:


	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Over 90 Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans
	(In thousands)
Residential real estate	$	5,652	$	581	$	1,590	$	7,823	$	122,891	$	130,714
Land		143		6		—		149		9,440		9,589
Total construction		135		—		279		414		4,634		5,048
Commercial real estate		788		337		678		1,803		58,282		60,085
Commercial business		143		—		2,001		2,144		19,835		21,979
Home equity and second mortgage		596		352		298		1,246		42,091		43,337
Other consumer		362		93		17		472		28,961		29,433

Total	$	7,819	$	1,369	$	4,863	$	14,051	$	286,134	$	300,185

F-22

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(4 - continued)

The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment in loans by class of loans at December 31, 2009:


	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Over 90 Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans
	(In thousands)
Residential real estate	$	5,418	$	1,411	$	1,872	$	8,701	$	131,054	$	139,755
Land		96		80		309		485		9,852		10,337
Total construction		112		—		162		274		10,097		10,371
Commercial real estate		25		—		2,798		2,823		57,103		59,926
Commercial business		278		28		1,976		2,282		20,656		22,938
Home equity and second mortgage		363		114		623		1,100		45,605		46,705
Other consumer		441		72		55		568		26,688		27,256

Total	$	6,733	$	1,705	$	7,795	$	16,233	$	301,055	$	317,288

The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, public information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company classifies loans based on credit risk at least quarterly. The Company uses the following regulatory definitions for risk ratings:

Special Mention: Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution’s credit position at some future date.

Substandard: Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful: Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

Loss: Loans classified as loss are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance on the institution’s books as an asset, without establishment of a specific valuation allowance or charge-off, is not warranted.

Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described process are considered to be pass rated loans.

F-23

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(4 - continued)

The following table presents the recorded investment in loans by risk category and class of loans as of the date indicated:


	Residential Real Estate		Land		Total Construction		Commercial Real Estate		Commercial Business		Home Equity and Second Mortgage		Other Consumer		Total
					(In thousands)
December 31, 2010:
Pass	$	121,604	$	9,172	$	4,588	$	50,742	$	18,568	$	42,014	$	29,275	$	275,963
Special mention		2,691		308		—		4,937		765		695		158		9,554
Substandard		3,468		109		181		2,626		498		238		—		7,120
Doubtful		2,951		—		279		1,780		2,148		390		—		7,548
Loss		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total	$	130,714	$	9,589	$	5,048	$	60,085	$	21,979	$	43,337	$	29,433	$	300,185

December 31, 2009:
Pass	$	131,769	$	9,787	$	8,563	$	51,166	$	20,013	$	45,386	$	26,939	$	293,623
Special mention		2,638		263		1,808		3,247		631		460		275		9,322
Substandard		3,053		26		—		2,329		56		403		42		5,909
Doubtful		2,295		261		—		3,184		2,238		456		—		8,434
Loss		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total	$	139,755	$	10,337	$	10,371	$	59,926	$	22,938	$	46,705	$	27,256	$	317,288

The Company does not have any classes of loans that are considered to be subprime.

F-24

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(5)	PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT

Premises and equipment as of December 31 consisted of the following:


(In thousands)	2010		2009
Land and land improvements	$	3,256	$	3,256
Leasehold improvements		50		159
Office buildings		9,967		9,922
Furniture, fixtures and equipment		4,702		4,570

		17,975		17,907
Less accumulated depreciation		6,983		6,316


Totals	$	10,992	$	11,591

Depreciation expense was $826,000 and $902,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

(6)	FORECLOSED REAL ESTATE

At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Bank had foreclosed real estate held for sale of $591,000 and $877,000, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, foreclosure losses in the amount of $1.7 million and $601,000, respectively, were charged off to the allowance for loan losses. Losses on subsequent write downs of foreclosed real estate of $2,000 and $82,000 for 2010 and 2009, respectively, are aggregated with realized gains and losses from the sale of foreclosed real estate. Net realized losses from the sale of foreclosed real estate amounted to $79,000 and $50,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The net gain or loss on foreclosed real estate is reported in other noninterest expense. Real estate taxes and other expenses of holding foreclosed real estate are included in other noninterest expenses and amounted to $133,000 and $136,000 in 2010 and 2009, respectively. Realized gains from the sale of foreclosed real estate totaling $12,000 were deferred for 2010 because the sales were financed by the Bank and did not qualify for recognition under generally accepted accounting principles. No realized gains from the sale of foreclosed real estate were deferred for 2009. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, deferred gains on the sale of foreclosed real estate financed by the Bank amounted to $17,000 and $9,000, respectively.

(7)	GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES

The Company acquired goodwill in the acquisition of Hometown Bancshares, Inc. during 2003. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment at least annually or more frequently upon the occurrence of an event or when circumstances indicate that the carrying amount is greater than its fair value. No impairment of goodwill was recognized during 2010 or 2009.

The following is a summary of other intangible assets subject to amortization as of December 31, 2010 and 2009:


*(In thousands)*	2010			2009
Core deposit intangibles:
Acquired in branch acquisition	$	181		$	181
Acquired in Hometown merger		566			566

Gross carrying amount		747			747

Accumulated amortization		(649	)		(576	)

	$	98		$	171

F-25

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(7 - continued)

Amortization expense was $73,000 for 2010 and 2009. Estimated amortization expense for each of the ensuing five years is as follows:


Year ending December 31:	*(In thousands)*
2011	$	66
2012		32
2013		—
2014		—
2015		—

(8)	DEPOSITS

The aggregate amount of time deposit accounts with balances of $100,000 or more was approximately $34.5 million and $40.1 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

At December 31, 2010, scheduled maturities of time deposits were as follows:


Year ending December 31:	*(In thousands)*
2011	$	81,214
2012		20,913
2013		15,610
2014		6,049
2015 and thereafter		1,948


Total	$	125,734

The Bank held deposits of approximately $8.0 million and $8.5 million for related parties at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

(9)	RETAIL REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS

Retail repurchase agreements represent overnight borrowings from deposit customers and the debt securities sold under the repurchase agreements are under the control of the Bank. Information concerning borrowings under repurchase agreements is summarized as follows:


*(Dollars in thousands)*	2010			2009
Weighted average interest rate at year end		0.76	%		0.91	%
Weighted average interest rate during the year		0.90	%		0.94	%
Average daily balance	$	8,142		$	5,428
Maximum month-end balance during the year	$	9,223		$	7,949

Debt securities underlying the agreements at December 31:

Amortized cost	$	11,178		$	12,693
Fair value	$	11,322		$	12,804

F-26

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(10)	ADVANCES FROM FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK

At December 31, 2010 and 2009, advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank were as follows:


	2010					2009
*(Dollars in thousands)*	Weighted Average Rate			Amount		Weighted Average Rate			Amount
Fixed rate advances		4.05	%	$	15,729		4.32	%	$	24,776

At December 31, 2010, advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank totaling $11.0 million carried a put option whereby the Federal Home Loan Bank will automatically convert the fixed rate advance to a variable rate should the market interest rate exceed a pre-determined strike rate.

The following is a schedule of maturities for advances outstanding as of December 31, 2010:


*(In thousands)*

Due in:
2011	$	3,379
2012		7,250
2013		5,100
2014		—
2015		—
Thereafter		—


Total	$	15,729

The advances are secured under a blanket collateral agreement. At December 31, 2010, the carrying value of residential mortgage loans and a mutual fund investment pledged as security for the advances was $93.2 million and $1.5 million, respectively.

(11)	LEASE COMMITMENTS

During 2010, the Bank extended a noncancelable lease agreement for branch office space which expires in 2015. The Bank also had a noncancelable sub-lease agreement for branch office space which expired in 2010. The Bank let that lease expire due to building a new office nearby which opened in 2009.

The subsidiary companies headquartered in Nevada lease office space under sublease agreements that automatically renew for one year periods each October.

The future minimum rental payments under noncancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of December 31, 2010 for each of the next five years and in the aggregate are as follows:


Year ending December 31:	*(In thousands)*
2011	$	15
2012		15
2013		15
2014		15
2015 and thereafter		4


Total	$	64

Total rental expense for all operating leases for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $48,000 and $49,000, respectively.

F-27

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(12)	INCOME TAXES

The components of income tax expense (benefit) were as follows:


*(In thousands)*	2010		2009
Current	$	1,412	$	353
Deferred		149		(939	)


Totals	$	1,561	$	(586	)

The reconciliation of income tax expense (benefit) with the amount which would have been provided at the federal statutory rate of 34% follows:


*(In thousands)*	2010			2009
Provision at federal statutory tax rate	$	1,849		$	65
State income tax-net of federal tax benefit		123			(259	)
Tax-exempt interest income		(342	)		(329	)
Increase in cash value of life insurance		(74	)		(75	)
Other		5			12


Totals	$	1,561		$	(586	)


Effective tax rate		28.7	%		N/A

Significant components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:


*(In thousands)*	2010			2009
Deferred tax assets (liabilities):
Depreciation	$	(589	)	$	(607	)
Deferred loan fees and costs		(111	)		(140	)
Deferred compensation plans		141			152
Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividends		(114	)		(127	)
Allowance for loan losses		1,760			1,857
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale		(214	)		(286	)
Acquisition purchase accounting adjustments		(35	)		(58	)
State net operating loss carryforward		26			151
Other		20			19


Net deferred tax asset	$	884		$	961

The Company has an Indiana net operating loss carryover of $489,000 available to reduce Indiana taxable income in subsequent years. The net operating loss carryover expires for the year ending December 31, 2024.

At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company had no liability for unrecognized income tax benefits and does not anticipate any increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits during the next twelve months. The Company believes that its income tax positions would be sustained upon examination and does not anticipate any adjustments that would result in a material change to its financial position or results of operations. The Company files U.S. federal income tax returns and Indiana state income tax returns. Returns filed in these jurisdictions for tax years ended on or after December 31, 2007 are subject to examination by the relevant taxing authorities.

F-28

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(12 - continued)

Prior to July 1, 1996, the Bank was permitted by the Internal Revenue Code to deduct from taxable income an annual addition to a statutory bad debt reserve subject to certain limitations. Retained earnings at December 31, 2010 and 2009 include approximately $1.0 million of cumulative deductions for which no deferred federal income tax liability has been recorded. Reduction of these reserves for purposes other than tax bad debt losses or adjustments arising from carryback of net operating losses would create income for tax purposes subject to the then current corporate income tax rate. The unrecorded deferred liability on these amounts was approximately $354,000 at December 31, 2010 and 2009.

Federal legislation enacted in 1996 repealed the use of the qualified thrift reserve method of accounting for bad debts for tax years beginning after December 31, 1995. As a result, the Bank discontinued the calculation of the annual addition to the statutory bad debt reserve using the percentage-of-taxable-income method and adopted the experience reserve method for banks. Under this method, the Bank computes its federal tax bad debt deduction based on actual loss experience over a period of years. The legislation also provided that the Bank will not be required to recapture its pre-1988 statutory bad debt reserves if it ceases to meet the qualifying thrift definitional tests as provided under prior law and if the Bank continues to qualify as a “bank” under existing provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.

Recapture of the Bank’s tax bad debt reserve is triggered if the Bank meets the definition of a “large bank” as defined in the Internal Revenue Code. Under the Internal Revenue Code, if a bank’s average adjusted assets exceeds $500 million for any tax year it is considered a “large bank” and must utilize the specific charge-off method to compute bad debt deductions. This would result in the recapture of the Bank’s tax bad debt reserve described above and a charge against earnings for the unrecorded deferred liability described above.

(13)	EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

Defined Contribution Plan:

The Bank has a qualified contributory defined contribution plan available to all eligible employees. The plan allows participating employees to make tax-deferred contributions under Internal Revenue Code Section 401(k). The Bank contributed $321,000 and $328,000 to the plan for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Employee Stock Ownership Plan:

On December 31, 1998, the Company established a leveraged employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) covering substantially all employees. The ESOP trust acquired 61,501 shares of Company common stock financed by a loan with the Company with a ten year term. The employer loan and the related interest income are not recognized in the consolidated financial statements as the debt is serviced from Company contributions. Dividends payable on allocated shares are charged to retained earnings and are satisfied by the allocation of cash dividends to participant accounts. Dividends payable on unallocated shares are not considered dividends for financial reporting purposes. Shares held by the ESOP trust are allocated to participant accounts based on the ratio of the current year principal and interest payments to the total of the current year and future year’s principal and interest to be paid on the employer loan. The employer loan was fully paid in 2008 and all shares of the Company common stock have been allocated to participant accounts.

Compensation expense is recognized based on the average fair value of shares released for allocation to participant accounts during the year with a corresponding credit to stockholders’ equity. No compensation expense was recognized for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 as all shares were allocated during 2008.

At December 31, 2010, the ESOP trust holds 64,377 shares of Company stock, including shares acquired on the open market, all of which have been allocated to participant accounts.

F-29

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(14)	DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLANS

The Bank has a deferred compensation plan whereby certain officers will be provided specific amounts of income for a period of fifteen years following normal retirement. The benefits under the agreements become fully vested after four years of service beginning with the effective date of the agreements. The Bank accrues the present value of the benefits so the amounts required will be provided at the normal retirement dates and thereafter.

Assuming normal retirement, the benefits under the plan are paid in varying amounts between 1999 and 2022. The Bank is the owner and beneficiary of insurance policies on the lives of these officers which may provide funds for a portion of the required payments. The agreements also provide for payment of benefits in the event of disability, early retirement, termination of employment or death. Deferred compensation expense for this plan was $21,000 and $24,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

The Bank also has a directors’ deferred compensation plan whereby a director defers into a retirement account a portion of his monthly director fees for a specified period to provide a specified amount of income for a period of fifteen years following normal retirement. The Bank also accrues the interest cost on the deferred obligation so the amounts required will be provided at the normal retirement dates and thereafter.

Assuming normal retirement, the benefits under the plan are paid in varying amounts between 1995 and 2037. The agreements also provide for payment of benefits in the event of disability, early retirement, termination of service or death. Deferred compensation expense for this plan was $17,000 and $16,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

(15)	STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS

The Company’s stock-based compensation plans are described below. No compensation cost was charged against income for those plans for 2010 or 2009. The total income tax benefit for stock options exercised was $6,000 for 2010. No income tax benefit was realized in 2009 for stock options exercised.

1999 Restricted Stock Compensation Plan

The Company’s restricted stock compensation plan was adopted to encourage directors, officers and key employees to remain in the employment or service of the Company. The plan provided for grants of up to 30,750 shares of the Company’s authorized but unissued common stock and all shares have been granted. The shares granted under the plan were in the form of restricted stock vesting over a five-year period beginning one year after the date of grant of the award. Compensation expense has been recognized over the requisite service period with a corresponding credit to stockholders’ equity. The requisite service period for restricted shares is the vesting period. The terms of the restricted stock compensation plan included a provision whereby all unearned shares become fully vested upon a “change in control” as defined in the plan. The Company had no nonvested restricted shares as of December 31, 2010 and 2009.

Stock Option Plans

The Company’s stock option plans adopted prior to 2000 provided for issuance of up to 209,192 shares of the Company’s authorized but unissued common stock to all employees, including any officer or employee-director. Under the plans, the Company could grant both non-statutory and statutory (i.e., incentive) stock options. In the case of incentive stock options, the aggregate fair value of the stock (determined at the time the incentive stock option is granted) for which any optionee may be granted incentive options which are first exercisable during any calendar year shall not exceed $100,000. Option prices may not be less than the fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of the grant. Options granted generally vest ratably over five years and are exercisable in whole or in part for a period up to ten years from the date of the grant. Certain stock options provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control (as defined in the plan).

F-30

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(15 - continued)

The fair market value of stock options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The expected term of options granted represents the period of time that options are expected to be outstanding and is based on historical trends. The risk free rate for the expected life of the options is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. No options were granted during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.

A summary of option activity under the plan as of December 31, 2010, and changes during the year then ended is presented below:


*(Dollars in thousands except per share data)*	Number of Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at beginning of year		32,615	$	10.00
Granted		—		—
Exercised		28,215	$	10.00
Forfeited or expired		4,400	$	10.00


Outstanding at end of year		—				—	$	—


Exercisable at end of year		—				—	$	—

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, was $135,000 and $37,000, respectively.

No compensation expense was recognized for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, related to the stock option plan. At December 31, 2010, there was no remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested stock options.

2009 Equity Incentive Plan

On May 20, 2009, the Company adopted the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the Plan). The Plan provides for the award of stock options, restricted stock, performance shares and stock appreciation rights. The aggregate number of shares of the Company’s common stock available for issuance under the Plan may not exceed 223,000 shares. The Company may grant both non-statutory and statutory stock options which may not have a term exceeding ten years. An award of a performance share is a grant of a right to receive shares of the Company’s common stock which is contingent upon the achievement of specific performance criteria or other objectives set at the grant date. Stock appreciation rights are equity or cash settled share-based compensation arrangements whereby the number of shares that will ultimately be issued or the cash payment is based upon the appreciation of the Company’s common stock. Awards granted under the Plan may be granted either alone or in addition to or, in tandem with, any other award granted under the Plan. As of December 31, 2010, no awards had been granted under the Plan.

F-31

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(16)	COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

In the normal course of business, there are outstanding various commitments and contingent liabilities, such as commitments to extend credit and legal claims, which are not reflected in the financial statements.

Commitments under outstanding standby letters of credit totaled $1.7 million at December 31, 2010.

The following is a summary of the commitments to extend credit at December 31, 2010 and 2009:


*(In thousands)*	2010		2009
Loan commitments:
Fixed rate	$	1,138	$	6,967
Adjustable rate		6,157		2,767
Unused lines of credit on credit cards		2,861		2,561
Undisbursed commercial and personal lines of credit		15,335		13,367
Undisbursed portion of construction loans in process		3,119		4,372
Undisbursed portion of home equity lines of credit		15,843		16,789

Total commitments to extend credit	$	44,453	$	46,823

(17)	FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE-SHEET RISK

The Bank is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the balance sheet.

The Bank’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual notional amount of those instruments (see Note 16). The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Bank evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount and type of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Bank upon extension of credit, varies and is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Standby letters of credit generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Bank’s policy for obtaining collateral, and the nature of such collateral, is essentially the same as that involved in making commitments to extend credit.

The Bank has not been required to perform on any financial guarantees and did not incur any losses on its commitments in 2010 or 2009.

F-32

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(18)	DIVIDEND RESTRICTION

As an Indiana corporation, the Company is subject to Indiana law with respect to the payment of dividends. Under Indiana law, the Company may pay dividends so long as it is able to pay its debts as they become due in the usual course of business and its assets exceed the sum of its total liabilities, plus the amount that would be needed, if the Company were to be dissolved at the time of the dividend, to satisfy any rights that are preferential to the rights of the persons receiving the dividend. The ability of the Company to pay dividends depends primarily on the ability of the Bank to pay dividends to the Company.

The payment of dividends by the Bank is subject to regulation by the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS). The Bank may not declare or pay a cash dividend or repurchase any of its capital stock if the effect thereof would cause the regulatory capital of the Bank to be reduced below regulatory capital requirements imposed by the OTS or below the amount of the liquidation account established upon completion of the conversion of the Bank’s former mutual holding company (First Capital, Inc., MHC) from mutual to stock form on December 31, 1998.

(19)	REGULATORY MATTERS

The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the OTS. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory-and possibly additional discretionary-actions by regulators, that if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Bank and the consolidated financial statements. Under the regulatory capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines involving quantitative measures of the Bank’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s capital amounts and classification under the prompt corrective action guidelines are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total risk-based capital and Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets (as defined in the regulations), Tier I capital to adjusted total assets (as defined) and tangible capital to adjusted total assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 2010, that the Bank meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.

As of December 31, 2010, the most recent notification from the OTS categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the table below. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the institution’s category.

The actual capital amounts and ratios are also presented in the following table. No amounts were deducted from capital for interest-rate risk in either year.

F-33

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(19 - continued)


	Actual					Minimum For Capital Adequacy Purposes:					Minimum To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions:
*(Dollars in thousands)*	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
As of December 31, 2010:

Total capital (to risk weighted assets)	$	43,607		15.54	%	$	22,448		8.00	%	$	28,060		10.00	%

Tier I capital (to risk weighted assets)	$	41,626		14.83	%		N/A				$	16,836		6.00	%

Tier I capital (to adjusted total assets)	$	41,626		9.32	%	$	17,866		4.00	%	$	22,332		5.00	%

Tangible capital (to adjusted total assets)	$	41,626		9.32	%	$	6,700		1.50	%		N/A

As of December 31, 2009:

Total capital (to risk weighted assets)	$	40,671		13.99	%	$	23,264		8.00	%	$	29,081		10.00	%

Tier I capital (to risk weighted assets)	$	38,928		13.39	%		N/A				$	17,448		6.00	%

Tier I capital (to adjusted total assets)	$	38,928		8.66	%	$	17,985		4.00	%	$	22,481		5.00	%

Tangible capital (to adjusted total assets)	$	38,928		8.66	%	$	6,744		1.50	%		N/A

F-34

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(20)	DISCLOSURES ABOUT FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The following table summarizes the carrying value and estimated fair value of financial instruments at December 31, 2010 and 2009:


	2010				2009
(In thousands)	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	21,575	$	21,575	$	15,857	$	15,857
Securities available for sale		100,851		100,851		93,729		93,729
Securities held to maturity		32		32		62		64
Loans held for sale		4,375		4,453		1,463		1,487

Loans, net of allowance for loan losses		294,550		307,083		311,092		319,295

Federal Home Loan Bank stock		3,194		3,194		3,551		3,551
Accrued interest receivable		1,894		1,894		2,054		2,054

Financial liabilities:
Deposits		378,003		380,713		374,476		377,928
Retail repurchase agreements		8,669		8,669		7,949		7,949
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		15,729		16,483		24,776		25,886
Accrued interest payable		649		649		980		980

Off-balance-sheet financial instruments:
Asset related to commitments to extend credit		—		49		—		72

The carrying amounts in the preceding table are included in the consolidated balance sheets under the applicable captions. The contractual or notional amounts of financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk are disclosed in Note 16.

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument for which it is practicable to estimate that value:

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For cash and cash equivalents, including cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits with banks, and federal funds sold, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Debt and Equity Securities

For marketable equity securities, the fair values are based on quoted market prices. For debt securities, the Company obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service and the fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, U.S. government and agency yield curves, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information, and the security’s terms and conditions, among other factors. For Federal Home Loan Bank stock, a restricted equity security, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value because it is not marketable.

F-35

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(20 - continued)

Loans

The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates its fair value.

Deposits

The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts, money market deposit accounts and other transaction accounts is the amount payable on demand at the balance sheet date. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. The carrying amount of accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.

Borrowed Funds

The carrying amount of retail repurchase agreements approximates its fair value. The fair value of advances from Federal Home Loan Bank is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans with the same remaining maturities could be obtained.

Commitments to Extend Credit

The majority of commitments to extend credit would result in loans with a market rate of interest if funded. The fair value of these commitments are the fees that would be charged to customers to enter into similar agreements. For fixed rate loan commitments, the fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates.

(21)	FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

FASB ASC Topic 820 , Fair Value Measurements, provides the framework for measuring fair value. That framework provides a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under FASB ASC Topic 820 are described as follows:


Level 1:		Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices, unadjusted, for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. A quoted market price in an active market provides the most reliable evidence of fair value and shall be used to measure fair value whenever available.

Level 2:		Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted market prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or inputs to the valuation methodology that are derived principally from or can be corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3:		Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using discounted cash flow methodologies, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

F-36

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(21 - continued)

A description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth below. These valuation methodologies were applied to all of the Company’s financial and nonfinancial assets carried at fair value or the lower of cost or fair value. The table below presents the balances of assets measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis as of December 31, 2010 and 2009. The Company had no liabilities measured at fair value as of December 31, 2010 and 2009.


	Carrying Value
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	*(In thousands)*
December 31, 2010:
*Assets Measured on a Recurring Basis*

Securities available for sale:
Agency mortgage-backed securities	$	—	$	12,681	$	—	$	12,681
Agency CMO		—		11,968		—		11,968
Privately-issued CMO		—		1,652		—		1,652
Agency notes and bonds		—		42,380		—		42,380
Municipal obligations		—		29,456		—		29,456
Mutual funds		2,714		—		—		2,714

Total securities available for sale	$	2,714	$	98,137	$	—	$	100,851


*Assets Measured on a Nonrecurring Basis*

Impaired loans	$	—	$	5,435	$	—	$	5,435
Loans held for sale		—		4,375		—		4,375
Foreclosed real estate		—		591		—		591

December 31, 2009:
*Assets Measured on a Recurring Basis*

Securities available for sale:
Agency mortgage-backed securities	$	—	$	18,377	$	—	$	18,377
Agency CMO		—		5,435		—		5,435
Privately-issued CMO		—		2,035		—		2,035
Agency notes and bonds		—		36,609		—		36,609
Municipal obligations		—		28,492		—		28,492
Mutual funds		2,781		—		—		2,781

Total securities available for sale	$	2,781	$	90,948	$	—	$	93,729


*Assets Measured on a Nonrecurring Basis*

Impaired loans	$	—	$	6,328	$	—	$	6,328
Loans held for sale		—		1,463		—		1,463
Foreclosed real estate		—		877		—		877

F-37

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(21 - continued)

Fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based on internally developed models or obtained from third parties that primarily use, as inputs, observable market-based parameters or a matrix pricing model that employs the Bond Market Association’s standard calculations for cash flow and price/yield analysis and observable market-based parameters. Valuation adjustments may be made to ensure that financial instruments are recorded at fair value, or the lower of cost or fair value. These adjustments may include unobservable parameters. Any such valuation adjustments have been applied consistently over time. The Company’s valuation methodologies may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. While management believes the Company’s valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.

Securities Available for Sale. Securities classified as available for sale are reported at fair value on a recurring basis. These securities are classified as Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy where quoted market prices from reputable third-party brokers are available in an active market. If quoted market prices are not available, the Company obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. These securities are reported using Level 2 inputs and the fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, U.S. government and agency yield curves, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information, and the security’s terms and conditions, among other factors. Changes in fair value of securities available for sale are recorded in other comprehensive income, net of income tax effect.

Impaired Loans. Impaired loans are carried at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or the fair value of collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Impaired loans are evaluated and valued at the time the loan is identified as impaired at the lower of cost or market value. For collateral dependent impaired loans, market value is measured based on the value of the collateral securing these loans and is classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. Collateral may be real estate and/or business assets, including equipment, inventory and/or accounts receivable, and its fair value is generally determined based on real estate appraisals or other independent evaluations by qualified professionals. Impaired loans are reviewed and evaluated on at least a quarterly basis for additional impairment and adjusted accordingly, based on the same factors identified above.

Loans Held for Sale. Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or market value. The portfolio comprised of residential real estate loans and fair value is based on specific prices of underlying contracts for sales to investors. These measurements are carried at Level 2.

Foreclosed Real Estate Held for Sale. Foreclosed real estate held for sale is reported at fair value less estimated costs to dispose of the property using Level 2 inputs. The fair values are determined by real estate appraisals using valuation techniques consistent with the market approach using recent sales of comparable properties. In cases where such inputs are unobservable, the balance is reflected within the Level 3 hierarchy.

There were no transfers in or out of the Company’s Level 3 financial assets for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. In addition, there were no transfers into or out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.

F-38

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(22)	PARENT COMPANY CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION (In thousands)

Condensed financial information for the Company (parent company only) follows:

Balance Sheets


	As of December 31,
	2010		2009
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	369	$	952
Other assets		139		141
Investment in subsidiaries		47,389		44,866

	$	47,897	$	45,959


Liabilities and Equity:
Accrued expenses	$	4	$	15
Stockholders’ equity		47,893		45,944

	$	47,897	$	45,959

Statements of Income


	Years Ended December 31,
	2010			2009
Interest income	$	2		$	4
Dividend income		1,356			3,011
Other operating expenses		(196	)		(269	)


Income before income taxes and equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries		1,162			2,746

Income tax benefit		81			110


Income before equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries		1,243			2,856

Equity in undistributed net income (loss) of subsidiaries		2,622			(2,090	)


Net income	$	3,865		$	766

Statements of Cash Flows


	Years Ended December 31,
	2010			2009
Operating Activities:
Net income	$	3,865		$	766
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash and cash equivalents provided by operating activities:
Equity in undistributed net (income) loss of subsidiaries		(2,622	)		2,090
Net change in other assets and liabilities		(2	)		33

Net cash provided by operating activities		1,241			2,889


Financing Activities:
Exercise of stock options		282			78
Purchase of treasury stock		(43	)		(626	)
Cash dividends paid		(2,063	)		(1,994	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(1,824	)		(2,542	)


Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(583	)		347

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		952			605


Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	369		$	952

F-39

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(23)	SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE FOR EARNINGS PER SHARE


	Years Ended December 31,
*(In thousands, except for share and per share data)*	2010		2009
Basic:
Earnings:
Net income	$	3,865	$	766


Shares:
Weighted average common shares outstanding		2,785,168		2,770,934


Net income per common share, basic	$	1.39	$	0.28


Diluted:
Earnings:
Net income	$	3,865	$	766


Shares:
Weighted average common shares outstanding		2,785,168		2,770,934
Add: Dilutive effect of outstanding options		1,059		13,146
Dilutive effect of restricted stock		—		—


Weighted average common shares outstanding, as adjusted		2,786,227		2,784,080


Net income per common share, diluted	$	1.39	$	0.28

(24)	SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION


	Years Ended December 31,
*(In thousands)*	2010		2009
Cash payments for:
Interest	$	5,834	$	8,823
Income taxes		1,153		471

Noncash investing activities:
Transfers from loans to real estate acquired through foreclosure	$	1,765	$	1,259
Proceeds from sales of foreclosed real estate financed through loans		438		136

F-40

FIRST CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

(25)	SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)


	First		Second			Third			Fourth
	Quarter		Quarter			Quarter			Quarter
	*(In thousands, except per share data)*
2010
Interest income	$	5,479	$	5,583		$	5,483		$	5,289
Interest expense		1,509		1,433			1,326			1,234

Net interest income		3,970		4,150			4,157			4,055
Provision for loan losses		460		420			590			567

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		3,510		3,730			3,567			3,488
Noninterest income		823		1,003			1,020			1,060
Noninterest expenses		2,890		3,395			3,315			3,162

Income before income taxes		1,443		1,338			1,272			1,386
Income tax expense		439		346			359			417


Net income		1,004		992			913			969
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in subsidiary		3		4			3			3

Net income attributable to First Capital, Inc.	$	1,001	$	988		$	910		$	966

Earnings per common share attributable to First Capital, Inc.:
Basic	$	0.36	$	0.35		$	0.33		$	0.35

Diluted	$	0.36	$	0.35		$	0.33		$	0.35

2009
Interest income	$	5,943	$	5,672		$	5,708		$	5,646
Interest expense		2,224		2,054			1,985			2,125

Net interest income		3,719		3,618			3,723			3,521
Provision for loan losses		425		1,959			980			925

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		3,294		1,659			2,743			2,596
Noninterest income		806		894			862			811
Noninterest expenses		3,031		3,438			3,923			3,081

Income (loss) before income taxes		1,069		(885	)		(318	)		326
Income tax expense (benefit)		264		(484	)		(331	)		(35	)


Net income (loss)		805		(401	)		13			361
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in subsidiary		2		4			3			3

Net income (loss) attributable to First Capital, Inc.	$	803	$	(405	)	$	10		$	358


Earnings (loss) per common share attributable to First Capital, Inc.:
Basic	$	0.29	$	(0.15	)	$	—		$	0.13

Diluted	$	0.29	$	(0.15	)	$	—		$	0.13

F-41

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


		FIRST CAPITAL, INC.

Date: March 25, 2011		/s/ William W. Harrod
		William W. Harrod
		President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


Name	Title	Date

/s/ William W. Harrod	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director	March 25, 2011
William W. Harrod	(principal executive officer)

/s/ J. Gordon Pendleton	Chairman	March 25, 2011
J. Gordon Pendleton

/s/ Michael C. Frederick	Senior Vice President, Chief	March 25, 2011
Michael C. Frederick	Financial Officer and Treasurer
	(principal accounting and
	financial officer)

/s/ Samuel E. Uhl	Chief Operating Officer and Director	March 25, 2011
Samuel E. Uhl

/s/ Mark D. Shireman	Director	March 25, 2011
Mark D. Shireman

/s/ Dennis L. Huber	Director	March 25, 2011
Dennis L. Huber

/s/ Kenneth R. Saulman	Director	March 25, 2011
Kenneth R. Saulman



/s/ John W. Buschemeyer	Director	March 25, 2011
John W. Buschemeyer

/s/ Gerald L. Uhl	Director	March 25, 2011
Gerald L. Uhl

/s/ Michael L. Shireman	Director	March 25, 2011
Michael L. Shireman

/s/ Kathryn W. Ernstberger	Director	March 25, 2011
Kathryn W. Ernstberger

/s/ William I. Orwick, Sr.	Director	March 25, 2011
William I. Orwick, Sr.

/s/ Carolyn E. Wallace	Director	March 25, 2011
Carolyn E. Wallace

	Director
Pamela G. Kraft

/s/ Christopher L. Byrd	Director	March 25, 2011
Christopher L. Byrd