e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number 1-6402-1
Service Corporation
International
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Texas
|
|
74-1488375
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. employer
identification no.)
|
|
|
|
1929 Allen Parkway
Houston, Texas
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
77019
(Zip code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
713/522-5141
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
Common Stock ($1 par value)
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
þ
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o (Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller Reporting
company o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Rule 12b-2). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the common stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant (assuming that the
registrants only affiliates are its officers and
directors) was $2,409,933,852 based upon a closing market price
of $9.86 on June 30, 2008 of a share of common stock as
reported on the New York Stock Exchange Composite
Transactions Tape.
The number of shares outstanding of the registrants common
stock as of February 20, 2009 was 250,932,474 (net of
treasury shares)
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants Proxy Statement in connection
with its 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (Part III)
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
INDEX
2
GLOSSARY
The following terms are common to the deathcare industry, are
used throughout this report, and have the following meanings:
Atneed Funeral and cemetery arrangements
initiated after a death has occurred.
Burial Vaults A reinforced container intended
to house and protect the casket before it is placed in the
ground.
Cremation The reduction of human remains to
bone fragments by intense heat.
General Agency (GA) Revenues Commissions we
receive from third party life insurance companies for life
insurance policies or annuities sold to preneed customers for
the purpose of funding preneed funeral arrangements. The
commission rate paid is determined based on the product type
sold, the length of payment terms, and the age of the
insured/annuitant.
Interment The burial or final placement of
human remains in the ground.
Lawn Crypt An underground outer burial
receptacle constructed of concrete and reinforced steel, which
is usually pre-installed in predetermined designated areas.
Marker A method of identifying a deceased
person in a particular burial space, crypt, or niche. Permanent
burial markers are usually made of bronze, granite, or stone.
Maturity When the underlying contracted
service is performed or merchandise is delivered, typically at
death. This is the point at which preneed contracts are
converted to atneed contracts (note delivery can
occur prior to death).
Mausoleum An above ground structure that is
designed to house caskets and cremation urns.
Cemetery Perpetual Care or Endowment Care
Fund A trust fund established for the purpose of
maintaining cemetery grounds and property into perpetuity.
Preneed Purchase of products and services
prior to use.
Preneed Backlog Future revenues from
unfulfilled preneed funeral and cemetery contractual
arrangements.
Production Sales of preneed funeral and
preneed or atneed cemetery contracts.
As used herein, SCI, Company,
we, our, and us refer to
Service Corporation International and companies owned directly
or indirectly by Service Corporation International, unless the
context requires otherwise.
3
PART I
General
Service Corporation International (SCI) is North Americas
leading provider of deathcare products and services, with a
network of funeral homes and cemeteries unequalled in geographic
scale and reach. At December 31, 2008, we operated 1,302
funeral service locations and 369 cemeteries (including 208
combination locations) in North America, which are
geographically diversified across 43 states, eight Canadian
provinces, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Our
funeral segment also includes the operations of 12 funeral homes
in Germany that we intend to exit when economic values and
conditions are conducive to a sale. As part of our Alderwoods
Group, Inc. (Alderwoods) acquisition in the fourth quarter of
2006, we acquired Mayflower National Life Insurance Company
(Mayflower), an insurance business that we sold in July 2007.
The operations of this business through the date of sale are
presented as discontinued operations in our consolidated
statement of operations.
History
We were incorporated in Texas in July of 1962. Our original
business plan was based on efficiencies of scale, specifically
reducing overhead costs by sharing resources such as embalming,
accounting, transportation, and personnel among funeral homes in
a business cluster. After proving the plans
effectiveness in Houston in the early 1960s, SCI set out to
apply this operating strategy through the acquisition of death
care businesses in other markets. It was the beginning of a
three-decade period of expansion that would create a North
American network of nearly 1,400 funeral homes and cemeteries by
the end of 1992. Beginning in 1993, we expanded beyond North
America, acquiring major death care companies in Australia, the
United Kingdom, and France, plus smaller holdings in other
European countries and South America. By the end of 1999, our
global network numbered more than 4,500 funeral service
locations, cemeteries, and crematories in 20 countries.
During the mid to late 1990s, acquisitions of deathcare
facilities became extremely competitive, resulting in increased
prices for acquisitions and substantially reduced returns on
invested capital. In 1999, we significantly reduced our level of
acquisition activity and over the next several years implemented
various initiatives to pay down debt, increase cash flow, reduce
overhead costs, and increase efficiency. We divested most of our
international businesses and many North American funeral homes
and cemeteries that were either underperforming or did not fit
our long-term strategy. At the same time we began to capitalize
on the strength of our network by introducing to North America
the first transcontinental brand of death care services and
products Dignity
Memorial®
(See www.dignitymemorial.com)
In late 2006, having arrived at a position of significant
financial strength and improved operating efficiency, we
acquired our biggest competitor, Alderwoods. By combining the
two leading companies in the deathcare industry, we are able to
realize more than $90 million in annual pretax cost
synergies, savings, and revenue enhancement opportunities.
Funeral
and Cemetery Operations
Worldwide, we have 1,314 funeral service locations and 369
cemeteries (including 208 combination locations) covering
43 states, eight Canadian provinces, the District of
Columbia, Puerto Rico, and Germany. See Note 16 in
Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data, for financial information about our business
segments and geographic areas.
Our funeral service and cemetery operations consist of funeral
service locations, cemeteries, funeral service/cemetery
combination locations, crematoria, and related businesses. We
provide all professional services relating to funerals and
cremations, including the use of funeral facilities and motor
vehicles and preparation and embalming services. Funeral related
merchandise, including caskets, burial vaults, cremation
receptacles, flowers, and other ancillary products and services,
is sold at funeral service locations. Our cemeteries provide
cemetery property interment rights, including mausoleum spaces,
lots, and lawn crypts, and sell cemetery related merchandise and
services, including stone and bronze memorials, burial vaults,
casket and cremation memorialization products,
4
merchandise installations, and burial openings and closings. We
also sell preneed funeral and cemetery products and services
whereby a customer contractually agrees to the terms of certain
products and services to be delivered and performed in the
future. As a result of these preneed sales, our backlog of
unfulfilled contracts was $6.2 billion and
$6.7 billion at December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Funeral service/cemetery combination locations are those
businesses in which a funeral service location is physically
located within or adjoining a cemetery that we own. Combination
locations allow certain facility, personnel, and equipment costs
to be shared between the funeral service location and cemetery.
Such combination facilities typically can be cost competitive
and have higher gross margins than if the funeral and cemetery
operations were operated separately. Combination locations also
create synergies between funeral and cemetery sales force
personnel and give families added convenience to purchase both
funeral and cemetery products and services at a single location.
With the acquisition of Alderwoods, we acquired Rose Hills,
which is the largest combination operation in the United States,
performing over 5,000 funeral services and 8,500 interments per
year.
Our operations in the United States and Canada are organized
into 37 major markets and 45 middle markets (including eight
Hispana markets). Each market is led by a market director with
responsibility for funeral
and/or
cemetery operations and preneed sales. Within each market, the
funeral homes and cemeteries share common resources such as
personnel, preparation services, and vehicles. There are four
market support centers in North America to assist market
directors with financial, administrative, pricing, and human
resource needs. These support centers are located in Houston,
Miami, New York, and Los Angeles. The primary functions of the
support centers are to help facilitate the execution of
corporate strategies, coordinate communication between the field
and corporate offices, and serve as liaisons for the
implementation of policies and procedures.
The following table (which includes businesses held-for-sale at
December 31, 2008) provides the number of our funeral
homes and cemeteries by country, and by state, territory, or
province:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Country, State/Territory/Province
|
|
Funeral Homes
|
|
Cemeteries
|
|
Total
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Arizona
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Arkansas
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
California
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
Colorado
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Connecticut
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
District of Columbia
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
Georgia
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Hawaii
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Idaho
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Illinois
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Indiana
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Iowa
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Kansas
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Kentucky
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Maine
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Maryland
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Massachusetts
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Country, State/Territory/Province
|
|
Funeral Homes
|
|
Cemeteries
|
|
Total
|
|
Mississippi
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Missouri
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Montana
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Nebraska
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Nevada
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
New Hampshire
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
New York
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
North Carolina
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Ohio
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Oregon
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Puerto Rico
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Rhode Island
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
South Carolina
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
Utah
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Virginia
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Washington
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
West Virginia
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Wisconsin
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alberta
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
British Columbia
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Manitoba
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
New Brunswick
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Nova Scotia
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Ontario
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Quebec
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
Saskatchewan
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,314
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
1,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe we have satisfactory title to the properties owned
and used in our business, subject to various liens,
encumbrances, and easements, which are incidental to ownership
rights and uses and do not materially detract from the value of
the property. We also lease a number of facilities that we use
in our business under both capital and operating leases.
At December 31, 2008, we owned approximately 91% of the
real estate and buildings used at our facilities, and the
remainder of the facilities were leased. At December 31,
2008, our 369 cemeteries contained a total of approximately
26,007 acres, of which approximately 63% was developed.
6
A map of our locations in North America is presented below:
Competition
Although there are several public companies that own funeral
homes and cemeteries, the majority of deathcare businesses are
locally-owned, independent operations. We estimate that our
funeral and cemetery market share in North America is
approximately 12% based on estimated total industry revenues.
The position of a single funeral home or cemetery in any
community is a function of the name, reputation, and location of
that funeral home or cemetery, although competitive pricing,
professional service and attention, and well-maintained
locations are also important.
We believe we have an unparalleled network of funeral service
locations and cemeteries that offer high quality products and
services at prices that are competitive with local competing
funeral homes, cemeteries, and retail locations. Within this
network, the funeral service locations and cemeteries operate
under various names as most operations were acquired as existing
businesses. We have branded our funeral operations in North
America under the name Dignity
Memorial®.
We believe our transcontinental branding strategy gives us a
strategic advantage and identity in the industry. While this
branding process is intended to emphasize our seamless national
network of funeral service locations and cemeteries, the
original names associated with acquired operations, and their
inherent goodwill and heritage, generally remain the same. For
example, Geo. H. Lewis & Sons Funeral Directors is now
Geo. H. Lewis & Sons Funeral Directors, a Dignity
Memorial®
provider.
Strategies
for Growth
Currently, we are relying on our strong competitive position and
financial strength to remain a solid leader in our industry,
despite the depressed state of the overall economy. We remain
optimistic that as economic conditions begin to improve, our
principal growth strategies will allow us to resume profitable
growth over the long-term. Our strategies are as follows:
Target
Our Customer
During 2008 we continued to build on the extensive consumer
research we conducted to develop a cohesive marketing and sales
program that targets profitable customer segments we believe are
most receptive to planning.
7
Coupled with very specialized training for our sales staff, the
launch of our marketing/sales program during the second half of
2008 in select markets began to validate our research. The
combination of targeted direct mail, select media advertising,
and a revitalized team approach from our sales organization is
generating quality leads that our sales team is able to close at
a high rate. We expect to expand the program into other Dignity
Memorial®
markets throughout 2009.
As a component of this new marketing/sales approach, we are also
working to strengthen our ties to the military community. Long a
supporter of United States veterans through Community Outreach
programs such as the Dignity Memorial Homeless Veterans Burial
Program, we have now developed a planning guide for veterans
that details their benefits available through the Veterans
Administration, as well as special benefits and burial options
available to them through Dignity
Memorial®
providers. Coupled with direct mail and advertising programs in
select markets, we are seeing lead generation and sales success
in this program as well. Our plan is to expand this program
throughout 2009 in other markets.
During 2008 we launched Dignity Planning, an end-of-life
planning tool available via the web, phones or in a paper
version. This planning tool reaches customers we might not
ordinarily contact, allowing families who are in the process of
estate planning the opportunity to plan a funeral in which they
detail the type of services and products they would like. The
total cost is then used as a basis for the amount of insurance
coverage they need. Although use of the Dignity Planning tool
does not require that consumers designate a Dignity
Memorial®
provider, our preliminary results indicate that most consumers
do choose a Dignity provider. We currently have agreements in
place with several insurance companies and insurance marketing
organizations to have their sales teams sell through Dignity
Planning, and we plan to expand that network throughout 2009.
Additionally, we have validated that consumers, via web search,
will use Dignity Planning for their end-of-life plans. In 2009,
we will continue to expand our online keyword search presence to
make Dignity Planning a more prevalent and visible site for
people wishing to create end-of-life plans.
Drive
Operating Discipline and Leverage Our Scale
We continue to improve our infrastructure through
standardization of processes and the usage of key performance
metrics for staffing and other operational and administrative
activities. One area of focus in 2008 that continued from the
previous year was an ongoing review of our location staffing
levels to ensure that we are aligning our funeral, cemetery and
central care resources appropriately with our volume of
business. In 2009 we expect to expand these efficiency reviews
and metrics to other areas of our business. Additionally, in
2008 we began to focus on gaining better companywide leverage of
our purchasing spend to reduce the total cost of materials,
goods and services. This involved identifying opportunities to
consolidate our supplier base, modifying processes and policies
for more efficient purchasing and employing metrics to manage
and improve supplier performance. We expect this discipline
around our supply chain activities to mature in the coming year.
Manage
and Grow the Footprint
We are managing our network of business locations by positioning
each business location to support the preferences of its local
customer base while monitoring each market for changing
demographics and competitive dynamics. We are also looking to
optimize our portfolio through strategic market reviews. We
expect to pursue selective business expansion through
construction or targeted acquisitions of cemeteries and funeral
homes with a focus on the highest return customer categories.
Over the long term, our size and scale also allow us the
opportunity to pursue a franchise business model, which could
drive incremental revenue at very little cost.
Employees
At December 31, 2008, we employed 13,581 (13,550 in North
America) individuals on a full-time basis and 7,190 (7,180 in
North America) individuals on a part-time basis. Of the
full-time employees, 12,820 were employed in the funeral and
cemetery operations and 761 were employed in corporate or other
overhead activities and services. All eligible employees in the
United States who so elect are covered by our group health and
life insurance plans. Eligible employees in the United States
are participants in retirement plans of SCI or various
subsidiaries, while international employees are covered by other
SCI (or SCI subsidiary) defined or government mandated
8
benefit plans. Approximately 3.6% of our employees in North
America are represented by unions. Although labor disputes occur
from time to time, relations with employees are generally
considered favorable.
Regulation
Our operations are subject to regulations, supervision, and
licensing under numerous foreign, federal, state, and local
laws, ordinances, and regulations, including extensive
regulations concerning trust funds, preneed sales of funeral and
cemetery products and services, and various other aspects of our
business. We strive to comply in all material respects with the
provisions of these laws, ordinances, and regulations. Since
1984, we have operated in the United States under the Federal
Trade Commission (FTC) comprehensive trade regulation rule for
the funeral industry. The rule contains requirements for funeral
industry practices, including extensive price and other
affirmative disclosures and imposes mandatory itemization of
funeral goods and services.
Other
Our corporate headquarters are located at 1929 Allen Parkway,
Houston, Texas 77019. The property consists of approximately
120,000 square feet of office space and 185,000 square
feet of parking space. We own and utilize an additional building
located in Houston, Texas for corporate activities containing a
total of approximately 38,000 square feet of office space.
We also lease approximately 29,000 square feet of office
space in Houston, Texas, which we utilize for corporate
activities.
We make available free of charge, on or through our website, our
annual, quarterly, and current reports and any amendments to
those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after
electronically filing such reports with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC). Our website is
http://www.sci-corp.com
and our telephone number is
(713) 522-5141.
The SEC also maintains an internet site at
http://www.sec.gov
that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and
other information regarding issuers that file electronically.
The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC
at the SECs Public Reference Room at
100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549.
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be
obtained by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
Each of our Board of Directors standing committee
charters, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Code of
Ethics for Board Members, and our Code of Conduct for Officers
and Employees are available, free of charge, through our website
or, upon request, in print. We will post on our internet website
all waivers to or amendments of our Code of Conduct for Officers
and Employees, which are required to be disclosed by applicable
law and rules of the New York Stock Exchange listing standards.
Information contained on our website is not part of this report.
Cautionary
Statement on Forward-Looking Statements
The statements in this
Form 10-K
that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements
made in reliance on the safe harbor protections provided under
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These
statements may be accompanied by words such as
believe, estimate, project,
expect, anticipate, or
predict that convey the uncertainty of future events
or outcomes. These statements are based on assumptions that we
believe are reasonable; however, many important factors could
cause our actual consolidated results in the future to differ
materially from the forward-looking statements made herein and
in any other documents or oral presentations made by, or on
behalf of, the Company. These factors are discussed below. We
assume no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements made herein or any other
forward-looking statements made by the Company, whether as a
result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
Our
affiliated funeral and cemetery trust funds own investments in
equity securities, fixed income securities, and mutual funds,
which are affected by market conditions that are beyond our
control.
Our affiliated funeral and cemetery trust funds own investments
in equity securities, fixed income securities and mutual funds.
Our earnings and losses and gains on these investments are
affected by market conditions that are
9
beyond our control. In 2008, the value of our trust funds was
significantly and adversely impacted by market volatility,
particularly in the fourth quarter of 2008.
The following table summarizes our investment losses and returns
(realized and unrealized), excluding fees, on our trust funds
for the fourth quarter of 2008 and the last three years ended
December 31.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q4 2008
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Preneed funeral trust funds
|
|
|
(13.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(23.5
|
)%
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
Cemetery merchandise and service trust funds
|
|
|
(15.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(26.9
|
)%
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
|
|
8.4
|
%
|
Perpetual care trust funds
|
|
|
(8.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(15.4
|
)%
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
10.8
|
%
|
Generally, earnings or gains and losses on our trust investments
are recognized, and we withdraw cash, when the underlying
service is performed, merchandise is delivered, or upon contract
cancellation; however, our cemetery perpetual care trusts
recognize earnings, and in certain states, capital gains and
losses, and we withdraw cash, when we incur qualifying cemetery
maintenance costs. Therefore, unless market conditions improve
and the value of our trust investments recover, our results of
operations and cash flows will be negatively impacted in 2009
and perhaps in future years as we recognize over time the
unrealized losses in our trusts.
If our trust funds experience additional significant investment
losses in 2009 or subsequent years, there could be insufficient
funds in the trusts to cover the costs of delivering services
and merchandise or maintaining cemeteries in the future. We
would have to cover any such shortfall with cash flows from
operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. For
more information related to our trust investments, see
Notes 4, 5, and 6 in Part II, Item 8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.
If the fair market value of these trusts, plus any other amount
due to us upon delivery of the associated contracts, were to
decline below the estimated costs to deliver the underlying
products and services, we would record a charge to earnings to
record a liability for the expected losses on the delivery of
the associated contracts. As of December 31, 2008, no such
charge was required. For additional information, see Critical
Accounting Policies in Part II, Item 7.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations.
We may
be required to replenish our affiliated funeral and cemetery
trust funds in order to meet minimal funding requirements, which
would have a negative affect on our earnings and cash
flow.
In certain states and provinces, we have withdrawn allowable
distributable earnings including unrealized gains prior to the
maturity or cancellation of the related contract. Additionally,
some states have laws that either require replenishment of
investment losses under certain circumstances or impose various
restrictions on withdrawals of future earnings when trust fund
values have dropped below certain prescribed amounts. In the
event of market declines, we may be required to deposit portions
or all of these amounts into the respective trusts in some
future period. As of December 31, 2008, we had unrealized
losses of $19.8 million in the various trusts in these
states. See Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, Contractual
Obligations, and Commercial and Contingent Commitments in
Part II, Item 7.
Our
ability to execute our strategic plan depends on many factors,
some of which are beyond our control.
Our strategic plan is focused on cost management and the
continued implementation of key revenue initiatives. Many of the
factors necessary for the execution of our strategic plan, such
as the number of deaths and general economic conditions, are
beyond our control. Changes in operating conditions, such as
supply disruptions and labor disputes, could negatively impact
our operations. Our inability to achieve the levels of cost
savings, productivity improvements, or earnings growth
anticipated by management could affect our financial
performance. Our inability to complete acquisitions,
divestitures, or strategic alliances as planned or to realize
expected synergies and strategic benefits could impact our
financial performance. We cannot give assurance that we will be
able to execute any or all of our strategic plan. Failure to
execute any or all of our strategic plan could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition, results of
operations, or cash flows.
10
Our
credit agreements and debt securities contain covenants that may
prevent us from engaging in certain transactions.
Our credit agreements and debt securities contain, among other
things, various affirmative and negative covenants that may
prevent us from engaging in certain transactions that might
otherwise be considered beneficial to us. These covenants limit,
among other things, our and our subsidiaries ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
Incur additional secured indebtedness (including guarantee
obligations);
|
|
|
|
Create liens on assets;
|
|
|
|
Engage in certain transactions with affiliates;
|
|
|
|
Enter into sale-leaseback transactions;
|
|
|
|
Engage in mergers, liquidations, and dissolutions;
|
|
|
|
Sell assets;
|
|
|
|
Enter into leases;
|
|
|
|
Pay dividends, distributions, and other payments in respect of
our capital stock;
|
|
|
|
Purchase our capital stock in the open market;
|
|
|
|
Make investments, loans, or advances;
|
|
|
|
Repay subordinated indebtedness or amend the agreements relating
thereto;
|
|
|
|
Change our fiscal year;
|
|
|
|
Create restrictions on our ability to receive distributions from
subsidiaries; and
|
|
|
|
Change our lines of business.
|
Our bank credit facility requires us to maintain certain
leverage and interest coverage ratios. These covenants and
coverage ratios may require us to take actions to reduce our
indebtedness or act in a manner contrary to our strategic plan
and business objectives. In addition, events beyond our control,
including changes in general economic and business conditions,
may affect our ability to satisfy these covenants. A breach of
any of these covenants could result in a default under our
indebtedness. If an event of default under our bank credit
facility occurs, the lenders could elect to declare all amounts
outstanding thereunder, together with accrued interest,
immediately due and payable. Any such declaration would also
result in an event of default under our Senior Indenture
governing our various senior notes. For additional information,
see Liquidity and Capital Resources in Part II,
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Result of Operations and Note 10 in
Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data.
If we
lost the ability to use surety bonding to support our preneed
funeral and preneed cemetery activities, we may be required to
make material cash payments to fund certain trust
funds.
We have entered into arrangements with certain surety companies
whereby such companies agree to issue surety bonds on our behalf
as financial assurance or as required by existing state and
local regulations. The surety bonds are used for various
business purposes; however, the majority of the surety bonds
issued and outstanding have been issued to support our preneed
funeral and cemetery activities. In the event all of the surety
companies cancelled or did not renew our surety bonds, which
generally have twelve-month renewal periods, we would be
required to either obtain replacement coverage or fund
approximately $232.8 million into state-mandated trust
accounts as of December 31, 2008.
The
funeral home and cemetery industry continues to be increasingly
competitive.
In North America, the funeral home and cemetery industry is
characterized by a large number of locally-owned, independent
operations. To compete successfully, our funeral service
locations and cemeteries must maintain good reputations and high
professional standards, as well as offer attractive products and
services at
11
competitive prices. In addition, we must market the Company in
such a manner as to distinguish us from our competitors. We have
historically experienced price competition from independent
funeral home and cemetery operators, monument dealers, casket
retailers, low-cost funeral providers, and other non-traditional
providers of services and merchandise. If we are unable to
successfully compete, our financial condition, results of
operations, and cash flows could be materially adversely
affected.
A
weakening economy could decrease preneed sales as well as
decrease amounts atneed customers are willing to
pay.
A weakening economy that causes customers to reduce
discretionary spending could cause, and we believe has caused in
the recent past, a decline in preneed sales, and could also
decrease the amounts atneed customers are willing to pay.
Declines in preneed cemetery property sales and average revenue
per atneed event would reduce current revenue. Declines in
preneed funeral and cemetery service and merchandise sales would
reduce our backlog and could reduce our future revenues and
market share. A weakening economy could also impact our
customers ability to pay, causing increased delinquencies,
increased bad debt, and decreased finance charge revenue, which
would reduce future earnings and cash flow.
Increasing
death benefits related to preneed funeral contracts funded
through life insurance or annuity contracts may not cover future
increases in the cost of providing a price-guaranteed funeral
service.
We sell price-guaranteed preneed funeral contracts through
various programs providing for future funeral services at prices
prevailing when the agreements are signed. For preneed funeral
contracts funded through life insurance or annuity contracts, we
receive in cash a general agency commission that typically
averages approximately 16% of the total sale from the third
party insurance company. Additionally, there is an increasing
death benefit associated with the contract of approximately 1%
per year to be received in cash at the time the funeral is
performed. There is no guarantee that the increasing death
benefit will cover future increases in the cost of providing a
price-guaranteed funeral service, and any such excess cost could
materially adversely affect our future cash flows, revenues, and
operating margins.
The
financial condition of third-party insurance companies that fund
our preneed funeral contracts may impact our future
revenues.
Where permitted, customers may arrange their preneed funeral
contract by purchasing a life insurance or annuity policy from
third-party insurance companies. The customer/policy holder
assigns the policy benefits to our funeral home to pay for the
preneed funeral contract at the time of need. If the financial
condition of the third-party insurance companies were to
deteriorate materially because of market conditions or
otherwise, there could be an adverse effect on our ability to
collect all or part of the proceeds of the life insurance
policy, including the annual increase in the death benefit, when
we fulfill the preneed contract at the time of need. Failure to
collect such proceeds could have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
Unfavorable
results of litigation could have a material adverse impact on
our financial statements.
As discussed in Note 12 of Part II, Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, we are subject to a
variety of claims and lawsuits in the ordinary course of our
business. Adverse outcomes in some or all of the pending cases
may result in significant monetary damages or injunctive relief
against us. Management currently believes that resolving all of
these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a
material adverse impact on our financial position, cash flows,
or results of operations; however, litigation and other claims
are subject to inherent uncertainties and managements view
of these matters may change in the future. There exists the
possibility of a material adverse impact on our financial
position, cash flows, and results of operations for the period
in which the effect of an unfavorable final outcome becomes
probable and reasonably estimable.
If the
number of deaths in our markets declines, our cash flows and
revenues may decrease.
If the number of deaths declines, the number of funeral services
and interments performed by us could decrease and our financial
condition, results of operations, and cash flows could be
materially adversely affected.
12
The
continuing upward trend in the number of cremations performed in
North America could result in lower revenue and gross
profit.
There is a continuing upward trend in the number of cremations
performed in North America as an alternative to traditional
funeral service dispositions. We have seen a recent
stabilization in the trend for our businesses as our strategic
pricing initiative and discounting policies have resulted in a
decline in highly-discounted, low-service cremation customers.
In our operations in North America during 2008, 41.9% of the
comparable funeral services we performed were cremation cases
compared to 41.4% and 40.3% performed in 2007 and 2006,
respectively. We continue to expand our cremation
memorialization products and services, which have resulted in
higher average sales for cremation services. If we are unable to
successfully expand our cremation memorialization products and
services, and cremations continue to be a significant percentage
of our funeral services, our financial condition, results of
operations, and cash flows could be materially adversely
affected.
The
funeral home and cemetery businesses are high fixed-cost
businesses.
The majority of our operations are managed in groups called
markets. Markets are geographical groups of funeral
service locations and cemeteries that share common resources
such as operating personnel, preparation services, clerical
staff, motor vehicles, and preneed sales personnel. Personnel
costs, the largest component of our operating expenses, are the
cost components most beneficially affected by this grouping. We
must incur many of these costs regardless of the number of
funeral services or interments performed. Because we cannot
necessarily decrease these costs when we experience lower sales
volumes, a sales decline may cause our margin percentages to
decline at a greater rate than the decline in revenues.
Regulation
and compliance could have a material adverse impact on our
financial results.
Our operations are subject to regulation, supervision, and
licensing under numerous foreign, federal, state, and local
laws, ordinances, and regulations, including extensive
regulations concerning trust funds, preneed sales of funeral and
cemetery products and services, and various other aspects of our
business. The impact of such regulations varies depending on the
location of our funeral and cemetery operations. Violations of
applicable laws could result in fines or sanctions against us.
In addition, from time to time, governments and agencies propose
to amend or add regulations, which would increase costs and
decrease cash flows. For example, foreign, federal, state,
local, and other regulatory agencies have considered and may
enact additional legislation or regulations that could affect
the deathcare industry. These include regulations that require
more liberal refund and cancellation policies for preneed sales
of products and services, limit or eliminate our ability to use
surety bonding, increase trust requirements, require the deposit
of funds or collateral to offset unrealized losses of trusts,
and/or
prohibit the common ownership of funeral homes and cemeteries in
the same market. If adopted by the regulatory authorities of the
jurisdictions in which we operate, these and other possible
proposals could have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
Compliance with laws, regulations, industry standards, and
customs concerning burial procedures and the handling and care
of human remains is critical to the continued success of our
business and any operations we may acquire. Litigation and
regulatory proceedings regarding these issues could have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of
operations, and cash flows. We are continually monitoring and
reviewing our operations in an effort to insure that we are in
compliance with these laws, regulations, and standards and,
where appropriate, taking appropriate corrective action.
A
number of years may elapse before particular tax matters, for
which we have established accruals, are audited and finally
resolved.
The number of tax years with open tax audits varies depending on
the tax jurisdiction. In the United States, the Internal Revenue
Service is currently examining our tax returns for 1999 through
2005 and various state jurisdictions are auditing years through
2006. While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome
or the timing of resolution of any particular tax matter, we
believe that our accruals reflect the probable outcome of known
tax contingencies. Unfavorable settlement of any particular
issue would reduce a deferred tax asset or require the use of
13
cash. Favorable resolution could result in reduced income tax
expense reported in the financial statements in the future.
Continued
economic crisis and financial and stock market declines could
reduce future potential earnings and cash flows and could result
in future goodwill impairments.
In addition to an annual review, we assess the impairment of
goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying value may be greater than fair value. Factors
that could trigger an interim impairment review include, but are
not limited to, a significant decline in our stock price,
significant underperformance relative to historical or projected
future operating results, and significant negative industry or
economic trends. If these factors occur, we may have a
triggering event, which could result in an impairment to our
goodwill. Based on the results of our annual goodwill impairment
test and the interim goodwill impairment test we performed using
December 31, 2008 fair value information, we concluded that
there was no impairment of our goodwill. However, if current
economic conditions worsen causing further deterioration in our
operating revenues, operating margins and cash flows, we may
have another triggering event that could result in an impairment
of our goodwill. Our cemetery segment, which has a goodwill
balance of $54.8 million as of December 31, 2008, is
more sensitive to market conditions and goodwill impairments
because it is more reliant on preneed sales, which are impacted
by customer discretionary spending. For additional information,
see Critical Accounting Policies in Part II, Item 7.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations.
Failure
to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting
could adversely affect our financial results, our operations and
our stock price, and cause investors to lose confidence in the
reliability of our financial statements.
Effective internal control over financial reporting is necessary
for us to provide reliable financial reports. When we identify
material weaknesses in our internal control over financial
reporting, such as those disclosed in Part II,
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures, we are unable to conclude
that our internal control over financial reporting is effective.
In such event, our financial results, operations and stock price
could be adversely affected, and investors could lose confidence
in the reliability of our financial statements.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments.
|
None.
Information regarding properties is set forth in Part I,
Item 1. Business.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings.
|
Information regarding legal proceedings is set forth in
Note 12 of Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
|
None.
14
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY
The following table sets forth as of February 27, 2009 the
name and age of each executive officer of the Company, the
office held, and the year first elected an officer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year First
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Became
|
|
Officer Name
|
|
Age
|
|
|
Position
|
|
|
Officer
|
|
|
R. L. Waltrip
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
|
1962
|
|
Thomas L. Ryan
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
1999
|
|
Michael R. Webb
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
|
1998
|
|
J. Daniel Garrison
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President Operations Support
|
|
|
|
1998
|
|
Philip C. Jacobs
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Stephen M. Mack
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President Middle Market Operations
|
|
|
|
1998
|
|
Gregory T. Sangalis
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President General Counsel and Secretary
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Eric D. Tanzberger
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|
|
|
|
2000
|
|
Sumner J. Waring, III
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President Major Market Operations
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
Jeffrey I. Beason
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
Vice President Corporate Controller
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Joseph A. Hayes
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
Vice President Ethics and Business Conduct and Assistant General
Counsel
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Jane D. Jones
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
Vice President Human Resources
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Albert R. Lohse
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
Vice President Litigation and Risk Management
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Elisabeth G. Nash
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
Vice President Process and Technology
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Mr. Waltrip is the founder, Chairman of the Company, and a
licensed funeral director. He grew up in his familys
funeral business and assumed management of the firm in the 1950s
after earning a Bachelors degree in Business
Administration from the University of Houston. He began buying
additional funeral homes in the 1960s, achieving cost
efficiencies by pooling their resources. At the end of 2008, the
network he began had grown to include more than 1,600 funeral
service locations and cemeteries. Mr. Waltrip took the
Company public in 1969. He has provided leadership to the
Company for over 41 years. In 2005, Mr. Waltrip
resigned as Chief Executive Officer, but he continues to serve
as Chairman of the Board.
Thomas L. Ryan joined the Company in June 1996 and served in a
variety of financial management roles until November 2000, when
he was asked to serve as Chief Executive Officer of European
Operations based in Paris, France. In July 2002, Mr. Ryan
returned to the United States where he was appointed President
and Chief Operating Officer of SCI. Mr. Ryan was elected
Chief Executive Officer of Service Corporation International in
February 2005 and has served as President of SCI since July
2002. Before joining SCI, Mr. Ryan was a Certified Public
Accountant with Coopers & Lybrand LLP for eight years.
He holds a bachelors degree in Business Administration
from the University of Texas at Austin. Mr. Ryan serves on
the Board of Directors of the American Diabetes Association.
Mr. Ryan also serves on the Board of Trustees of the Texas
Gulf Coast United Way, where he chaired the Young Leaders
Campaign and served on the Finance and Audit Committee.
Mr. Ryan is a member and Chapter Secretary of the
Young Presidents Organization. Mr. Ryan also serves on the
University of Texas McCombs Business School Advisory Council and
on the JPMorgan Chase Houston Regional Advisory Board.
Mr. Webb joined the Company in 1991 when it acquired
Arlington Corporation, a regional funeral and cemetery
consolidator, where he was then Chief Financial Officer. Prior
to joining Arlington Corporation, Mr. Webb held various
executive financial and development roles at Days Inns of
America and Telemundo Group, Inc. In 1993, Mr. Webb joined
our corporate development group, which he later led on a global
basis before accepting operational responsibility for our
Australian and Hispanic businesses. Mr. Webb was promoted
to Vice President International Corporate Development in
February 1998 and was named Executive Vice President in July
2002. In February 2005, he was promoted to Chief Operating
Officer. He is a graduate of the University of Georgia, where he
earned a Bachelor of Business Administration degree.
15
Mr. Garrison joined the Company in 1978 and worked in a
series of management positions until he was promoted to
President of the Southeastern Region in 1992. In 1998,
Mr. Garrison was promoted to Vice President International
Operations. In 2000, Mr. Garrison became Vice President
North American Cemetery Operations and was promoted to Vice
President Operations Services in August 2002. He assumed his
current position as Senior Vice President Operations Support in
February 2005. Mr. Garrison has a Bachelor of Science
degree in Administrative Management from Clemson University.
Mr. Jacobs joined SCI in 2007 as Senior Vice President and
Chief Marketing Officer. Prior to joining the Company,
Mr. Jacobs was employed by CompUSA as Chief Marketing
Officer. Prior to that he was employed by Publicis Worldwide as
Chief Marketing Officer and prior to that held other management
roles over the past 23 years at several of the
nations top advertising agencies, as well as client-side
positions. Mr. Jacobs holds a Bachelor of Science degree
from the University of Tennessee and a Masters degree from
Vanderbilt University.
Mr. Mack joined the Company in 1973 as a resident director
after graduating from Farmingdale State University of New York.
He became Vice President of the Eastern Region in 1987 and in
February 1998 Mr. Mack was appointed Vice President North
American Funeral Operations. Mr. Mack was promoted to
Senior Vice President Eastern Operations in August 2002 and
assumed the office of Senior Vice President Middle Market
Operations, his current position, in May 2004.
Mr. Sangalis joined the Company in 2007 as Senior Vice
President General Counsel and Secretary. He previously served as
Senior Vice President, Law and Administration for Team Inc., a
leading provider of specialty industrial maintenance and
construction services. Prior to that, Mr. Sangalis served
as Managing Director and General Counsel of Main Street Equity
Ventures II, a private equity investment firm, and as Senior
Vice President General Counsel and Secretary for Waste
Management, Inc., the leading provider of waste management
services in North America. Mr. Sangalis holds a
bachelors degree in finance from Indiana University and an
M.B.A. from the University of Minnesota. He earned his juris
doctorate from the University of Minnesota Law School.
Mr. Tanzberger joined the Company in August 1996 as Manager
of Budgets & Financial Analysis. He was promoted to
Vice President Investor Relations and Assistant Corporate
Controller in January 2000 and to Corporate Controller in August
2002. In 2006, Mr. Tanzberger was promoted to the position
of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. In 2007,
Mr. Tanzberger was appointed Treasurer. Prior to joining
the Company, Mr. Tanzberger was Assistant Corporate
Controller at Kirby Marine Transportation Corporation, an inland
waterway barge and tanker company, from January through August
1996. Prior thereto, he was a Certified Public Accountant with
Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. for more than five years.
Mr. Tanzberger is a graduate of the University of Notre
Dame, where he earned a Bachelor of Business Administration
degree.
Mr. Waring, a licensed funeral director, joined the Company
as an Area Vice President in 1996 when we merged with his
familys funeral business. Mr. Waring was appointed
Regional President of the Northeast Region in 1999 and was
promoted to Regional President of the Pacific Region in
September 2001. Mr. Waring was promoted to Vice President
Western Operations in August 2002 and assumed the office of Vice
President Major Market Operations in November 2003. In February
2006, Mr. Waring was promoted to Senior Vice President
Major Market Operations. In July 2008, Mr. Warings
responsibilities were expanded to include business development.
Mr. Waring holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business
Administration from Stetson University, a degree in Mortuary
Science from Mt. Ida College and a Masters of Business
Administration degree from the University of Massachusetts
Dartmouth.
Mr. Beason joined SCI in July 2006 as Vice President and
Corporate Controller. Prior to joining SCI, he was an employee
of El Paso Corporation, a natural gas transmission and
production company. Mr. Beason joined El Paso in 1978
and held various accounting and reporting roles until 1993. From
1993 to 1996, he held the position of Sr. Vice President
Administration of Mojave Pipeline Operating Company, a wholly
owned subsidiary of El Paso Corporation. From 1996 to
November 2005, Mr. Beason was Senior Vice President
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of El Paso
Corporation. He is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a
Bachelor of Business Administration in Accounting degree from
Texas Tech University.
Mr. Hayes was appointed Vice President Ethics and Business
Conduct and Assistant General Counsel in November 2007.
Mr. Hayes joined the Company in 1991 as corporate counsel.
He was named Managing Counsel in
16
1996 and Assistant General Counsel in 2005. Prior to joining
SCI, Mr. Hayes practiced law in Chicago and San Diego,
specializing in securities, mergers and acquisitions, and
commercial transactions. He received a bachelors degree in
commerce from DePaul University and earned his juris doctorate
from the University of California at Berkeley.
Mrs. Jones joined SCI in 2003 from Dynegy, Inc., where she
served as Vice President of Total Rewards. She oversees human
resources, training and education, and payroll and commission
services activities that assist approximately
20,000 employees in North America. Mrs. Jones was
promoted to Vice President Human Resources in February 2005. She
holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Accounting
with a minor in Finance from Southern Methodist University. She
is a Certified Compensation Professional.
Mr. Lohse joined SCI in 2000 as Managing Director of
Litigation and has since been involved in the resolution of
major litigation issues for the Company. In 2004, Mr. Lohse
was promoted to Vice President Corporate Governance. Before
joining the Company, Mr. Lohse was Managing Partner at
McDade, Fogler, Maines & Lohse where he conducted a
general civil trial practice. Prior to that, he practiced tort
and commercial litigation at Fulbright & Jaworski.
Mr. Lohse received a Bachelor of Business Administration
degree from the University of Texas and a juris doctorate from
the University of Houston Law Center.
Ms. Nash joined SCI in 2002 as Managing Director of
Strategic Planning and Process Improvement. Prior to joining
SCI, Ms. Nash worked for the Pennzoil Corporation and held
various senior management accounting and financial positions. In
2004, Ms. Nash was promoted to Vice President Continuous
Process Improvement. Her primary responsibilities include
improving operating systems, reducing overhead costs, and
identifying and assisting in the implementation of initiatives
to improve operating profit margins and cash flow. She is a
graduate of Texas A&M University where she received a
Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Accounting.
Each officer of the Company is elected by the Board of Directors
and holds their office until a successor is elected and
qualified or until earlier death, resignation, or removal in the
manner prescribed in the Bylaws of the Company. Each officer of
a subsidiary of the Company is elected by the subsidiarys
board of directors and holds their office until a successor is
elected and qualified or until earlier death, resignation, or
removal in the manner prescribed in the Bylaws of the Subsidiary.
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
|
Our common stock has been traded on the New York Stock Exchange
since May 14, 1974. On December 31, 2008, there were
4,787 holders of record of our common stock. In calculating the
number of shareholders, we consider clearing agencies and
security position listings as one shareholder for each agency or
listing. At December 31, 2008, we had
249,472,075 shares outstanding, net of 481,000 treasury
shares.
During 2008, we paid cash dividends totaling $41.5 million
and accrued $10.0 million for dividends paid on
January 30, 2009. While we intend to pay regular quarterly
cash dividends for the foreseeable future, all subsequent
dividends are subject to final determination by our Board of
Directors each quarter after its review of our financial
performance.
The table below shows our quarterly high and low closing common
stock prices for the two years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
13.88
|
|
|
$
|
9.48
|
|
|
$
|
12.20
|
|
|
$
|
10.31
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
$
|
11.29
|
|
|
$
|
9.86
|
|
|
$
|
13.98
|
|
|
$
|
11.66
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
$
|
10.50
|
|
|
$
|
8.14
|
|
|
$
|
12.90
|
|
|
$
|
11.04
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
$
|
8.26
|
|
|
$
|
4.31
|
|
|
$
|
14.47
|
|
|
$
|
12.83
|
|
17
Options in our common stock are traded on the Philadelphia Stock
Exchange. Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol SCI.
Stock Performance Graph. This graph assumes
the total return on $100 invested on December 31, 2003, in
SCI Common Stock, the S&P 500 Index, and a peer group
selected by the Company (the Peer Group). The Peer
Group is comprised of Alderwoods Group, Inc., Carriage Services,
Inc., Hillenbrand Inc., Matthews International Corp., Rock of
Ages Corporation, and Stewart Enterprises, Inc. Hillenbrand
Inc. is included in the Peer Group starting March 31, 2008
when it was spun off from Hillenbrand Industries, Inc. Prior to
the spin-off, the Peer Group included Hillenbrand Industries,
Inc. Alderwoods Group is included in the Peer Group until
November 28, 2006, when it was acquired by SCI. Total
return data assumes reinvestment of dividends.
TOTAL
SHAREHOLDER RETURNS
For equity compensation plan information, see Part III to
these consolidated financial statements.
On October 31, 2008, we issued 1,162 deferred common stock
equivalents or units pursuant to provisions regarding the
receipt of dividends under the Amended and Restated Director Fee
Plan to four non-employee directors. These issuances were
unregistered as they did not constitute a sale
within the meaning of Section 2(3) of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended.
18
Since 2004, we have repurchased a total of $1.0 billion of
common stock at an average cost per share of $9.42. During the
three months ended December 31, 2008, we repurchased
10,678,218 shares of our common stock at an aggregate cost
of $62.7 million and an average cost per share of $5.87. In
November 2008, our Board of Directors approved an increase in
our share repurchase program authorizing the investment of up to
an additional $120 million to repurchase our common stock.
The remaining dollar value of shares to be purchased under the
share repurchase program was $123.4 million at
December 31, 2008. As discussed in Item 1A, our credit
agreement and debt securities contain covenants that restrict
our ability to repurchase our common stock. Pursuant to the
program, we repurchased shares of our common stock during the
fourth quarter of 2008 as set forth in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Dollar Value of
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Shares That May
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly
|
|
|
Yet be Purchased
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Announced Programs
|
|
|
Under the Program
|
|
|
October 1, 2008 October 31, 2008
|
|
|
2,832,343
|
|
|
$
|
6.47
|
|
|
|
2,832,343
|
|
|
$
|
47,811,794
|
|
November 1, 2008 November 30, 2008
|
|
|
4,373,575
|
|
|
$
|
5.97
|
|
|
|
4,373,575
|
|
|
$
|
141,682,626
|
|
December 1, 2008 December 31, 2008
|
|
|
3,472,300
|
|
|
$
|
5.25
|
|
|
|
3,472,300
|
|
|
$
|
123,444,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,678,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,678,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data.
|
The table below contains selected consolidated financial data as
of and for the years ended December 31, 2004 through
December 31, 2008. The statement of operations data
includes reclassifications of certain items to conform to
current period presentations with no impact on net income or
financial position.
The data set forth below should be read in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes to
these consolidated financial statements. This historical
information is not necessarily indicative of future results.
Selected
Consolidated Financial Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007(5)
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
Selected Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
2,155.6
|
|
|
$
|
2,285.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,752.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,717.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,832.0
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of
accounting changes
|
|
$
|
97.4
|
|
|
$
|
243.3
|
|
|
$
|
52.6
|
|
|
$
|
55.1
|
|
|
$
|
117.4
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax(1)
|
|
$
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.4
|
|
|
$
|
3.9
|
|
|
$
|
4.5
|
|
|
$
|
43.8
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting changes, net of tax(2)(3)(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(187.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(50.6
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
97.1
|
|
|
$
|
247.7
|
|
|
$
|
56.5
|
|
|
$
|
(127.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
110.7
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of
accounting changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
.38
|
|
|
$
|
.85
|
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
|
$
|
.37
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
.37
|
|
|
$
|
.83
|
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
|
$
|
.36
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
.38
|
|
|
$
|
.87
|
|
|
$
|
.19
|
|
|
$
|
(.42
|
)
|
|
$
|
.35
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
.37
|
|
|
$
|
.85
|
|
|
$
|
.19
|
|
|
$
|
(.42
|
)
|
|
$
|
.34
|
|
Cash dividends declared per share
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.105
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Selected Consolidated Balance Sheet Data (at December 31):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
8,110.9
|
|
|
$
|
8,932.2
|
|
|
$
|
9,729.4
|
|
|
$
|
7,544.8
|
|
|
$
|
8,227.2
|
|
Long-term debt (less current maturities), including capital
leases
|
|
$
|
1,821.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,820.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,912.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,186.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,200.4
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,293.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,492.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,594.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,581.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,843.0
|
|
Selected Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
350.2
|
|
|
$
|
356.2
|
|
|
$
|
324.2
|
|
|
$
|
312.9
|
|
|
$
|
94.2
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our operations in Singapore, which were sold in 2006, and our
operations in Argentina, Uruguay, and Chile, which were sold in
2005, have been classified as discontinued operations for all
periods presented. The operations of Mayflower, which were sold
in 2007, have been classified as discontinued operations in 2007
and 2006 (since our acquisition of Alderwoods). For more
information regarding discontinued operations, see Note 19
in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data. |
|
(2) |
|
In 2005, we changed our accounting to expense our direct selling
costs related to preneed funeral and cemetery sales in the
period in which they were incurred. In connection with this
accounting change, we recorded a |
20
|
|
|
|
|
$187.5 million charge, net of tax, for the cumulative
effect of this change in 2005 and our results for 2008, 2007,
2006, and 2005 reflect this change. |
|
(3) |
|
On March 18, 2004, we implemented revised Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46
(FIN 46R). Under the provisions of FIN 46R, we are
required to consolidate our preneed funeral and cemetery
merchandise and service trust assets, cemetery perpetual care
trusts, and certain cemeteries. As a result of this accounting
change, we recognized a cumulative effect charge of
$14.0 million, net of tax, in 2004. |
|
(4) |
|
Results for 2004 include a $36.6 million charge, net of
tax, for the cumulative effect of our change in accounting for
pension gains and losses. |
|
(5) |
|
Results for 2007 include a $158.1 million pretax gain on
redemption of securities related to our former equity investment
in France. |
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
The
Company
We are North Americas leading provider of deathcare
products and services, with a network of funeral homes and
cemeteries unequalled in geographic scale and reach. Our funeral
service and cemetery operations consist of funeral service
locations, cemeteries, funeral service/cemetery combination
locations, crematoria, and related businesses. We sell cemetery
property and funeral and cemetery products and services at the
time of need and on a preneed basis.
We continue to focus on returning capital to our shareholders.
Since 2004, we have invested $1 billion in cumulative stock
repurchases and quarterly dividends. We currently have over
$123.4 million authorized to repurchase our common stock.
Our financial stability is further enhanced by our
$6.2 billion backlog of future revenues at
December 31, 2008, which is the result of preneed funeral
and cemetery sales. We believe we have the financial strength
and flexibility to reward shareholders through dividends while
maintaining a prudent capital structure and pursuing new
opportunities for profitable growth.
Financial
Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
Recent
Volatility in Financial Markets
Our funeral, cemetery merchandise and service, and cemetery
perpetual care trusts have been and continue to be impacted by
adverse conditions in the U.S. and global financial
markets. The fair market value of our trust investments declined
sharply in 2008, particularly in the fourth quarter of 2008 when
our trust funds experienced investment losses of 12.6%. In 2008,
we realized aggregate net losses of $67.6 million in our
preneed funeral and cemetery merchandise and service trusts. In
addition, we realized aggregate net losses of $13.2 million
in our cemetery perpetual care trusts.
As of December 31, 2008, we have net unrealized losses of
$488.9 million in our preneed funeral and cemetery
merchandise and service trusts, and net unrealized losses of
$159.9 million in our cemetery perpetual care trusts, as
discussed in Notes 4, 5, and 6 in Part II,
Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. At
December 31, 2008, these net unrealized losses represented
24% of our original cost basis of $2.7 billion. As
explained in Critical Accounting Policies, Fair Value
Measurements, changes in unrealized gains
and/or
losses related to these securities are reflected in Other
comprehensive income (loss) and offset by the Deferred
preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust and
Care trusts corpus interest in those unrealized
gains and/or
losses. Therefore, the majority of these significant net
unrealized losses are not reflected in our consolidated
statement of operations for the year ended December 31,
2008. We do, however, rely on our trust investments to provide
funding for the various contractual obligations that arise upon
maturity of the underlying preneed contracts. Because of the
long-term relationship between the establishment of trust
investments and the required performance of the underlying
contractual obligations, the impact of current market conditions
that may exist at any given time is not necessarily indicative
of our ability to generate profit on our future performance
obligations.
This magnitude of the market decline in such a short time frame
and the resulting net unrealized losses in our trust investments
were not anticipated. Typically, net unrealized losses in our
funeral and cemetery merchandise and services trusts have a
minimal impact on our reported results of operations; however,
in the fourth quarter of 2008,
21
the net unrealized losses had a significant adverse impact on
trust fund income associated with our preneed funeral and
cemetery merchandise and service trusts.
We anticipate that the decline in the value of our trust
investments will negatively impact our financial performance in
the future. Until the market values of our trust investments
increase significantly, we expect to report lower earnings from
our trusts. In addition, we expect to report lower cash flow
from operations due to a reduction in earnings and lower amounts
of distributable investment earnings from certain trusts where
we are allowed to withdraw funds prior to the delivery of
merchandise and services. Generally these distributions are not
allowed unless the market value exceeds the cost of our trust
investments.
When we performed our evaluation of goodwill during the fourth
quarter of 2008, the fair values of our reporting units exceeded
their respective book values. However, if current economic
conditions worsen causing further deterioration in our operating
revenues, operating margins, and cash flows, we may have a
triggering event that could result in an impairment to our
goodwill in future periods. Our cemetery segment, which has a
goodwill balance of $54.8 million as of December 31,
2008, is more sensitive to market conditions and goodwill
impairments because it is more reliant on preneed sales, which
are impacted by customer discretionary spending.
The weakened economy has also negatively impacted our cemetery
property sales. In 2008, preneed and atneed cemetery property
production, net of discounts, declined 5.4%, which significantly
decreased our cemetery revenue and cash flow. In addition, our
preneed cemetery service and merchandise production decreased
9.4% compared to 2007, which does not impact current revenue but
reduces our preneed backlog and will reduce our future revenues.
See Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors for additional
information.
Capital
Allocation Considerations
We rely on cash flow from operations as a significant source of
liquidity. Our cash flow from operating activities provided
$350.2 million in 2008. Our current cash and cash
equivalents balance is approximately $148 million as of
February 25, 2009. In addition, we have approximately
$247 million in excess borrowing capacity under our
revolving credit facility, which matures in November 2011
(currently used to support $52.7 million of letters of
credit). We have $28.7 million in 7.7% notes due in
April 2009; however, we intend to refinance these notes on a
long-term basis through the utilization of our revolving credit
facility. Exclusive of the notes due April 2009 discussed above,
we have no significant maturities of long-term debt until
November 2011. We believe these sources of liquidity can be
supplemented by our ability to access the capital markets for
additional debt or equity securities. However, given the current
environment, interest rates on borrowings are significantly
higher than levels experienced in recent history.
We believe our cash on hand, future operating cash flows, and
the available capacity under our credit facility described above
will be adequate to meet our working capital needs and other
financial obligations over the next twelve months.
Our bank credit facility requires us to maintain certain
leverage and interest coverage ratios. As of December 31,
2008 we were in compliance with all of our debt covenants. Our
financial covenant requirements and actual ratios as of
December 31, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Credit Agreement
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
|
Leverage ratio
|
|
|
4.75 (Max
|
)
|
|
|
3.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest coverage ratio
|
|
|
2.50 (Min
|
)
|
|
|
3.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our financial covenant requirements per our agreement become
more restrictive over time. The future leverage and interest
coverage ratios are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage Ratio (Max)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
4.25
|
|
2010
|
|
|
3.75
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Coverage Ratio (Min)
|
|
2009 thru June 2010
|
|
|
2.75
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
3.00
|
|
We expect to continue to focus on funding growth initiatives
that generate increased profitability, revenue, and cash flows.
These capital investments include the construction of high-end
cemetery property (such as private family estates) and the
construction of funeral home facilities. We will also consider
the acquisition of additional deathcare operations that fit our
long-term customer-focused strategy, if the expected returns
exceed our cost of capital. Our outlook for capital improvements
at existing facilities and cemetery development expenditures in
2009 is $80 to $90 million.
We paid our shareholders cash dividends from 1974 to 1999. In
early 2005, we resumed paying shareholders a quarterly cash
dividend of $0.025 per common share. In November 2006, we
increased our quarterly dividend to $0.03 per common share. In
November 2007, we increased our quarterly dividend to $0.04 per
common share. While we intend to pay regular quarterly cash
dividends for the foreseeable future, all future dividends are
subject to limitations in our debt covenants and final
determination by our Board of Directors each quarter upon review
of our financial performance.
We currently have approximately $123.4 million authorized
under our share repurchase program. We intend to make purchases
from time to time in the open market or through privately
negotiated transactions, subject to market conditions, debt
covenants, and normal trading restrictions. Our credit agreement
and privately-placed debt securities contain covenants that
limit our ability to repurchase our common stock. There can be
no assurance that we will buy our common stock under our share
repurchase program in the future.
Cash
Flow
We believe our ability to generate strong operating cash flow is
one of our fundamental financial strengths and provides us with
substantial flexibility in meeting operating and investing
needs. Set forth below is a reconciliation of net cash provided
by operating activities excluding special items to our reported
net cash provided by operating activities prepared in accordance
with GAAP. We believe this non-GAAP financial measure provides a
consistent basis for comparison between periods and better
reflects the performance of our core operations. We do not
intend for this information to be considered in isolation or as
a substitute for other measures of performance prepared in
accordance with GAAP.
Operating
Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities, as reported
|
|
$
|
350.2
|
|
|
$
|
356.2
|
|
|
$
|
324.2
|
|
One-time Alderwoods transition and other costs
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
38.6
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Premiums paid on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
Redemption of French securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net tax refund
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension termination
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
40.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities, excluding special
items
|
|
$
|
355.3
|
|
|
$
|
430.4
|
|
|
$
|
343.1
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities, excluding special
items, decreased approximately $75 million in 2008 compared
to 2007. This decrease reflects the sale of Mayflower Insurance
Co., which contributed $17.3 million of operating cash
flows from discontinued operations in 2007 and $8.6 million
in insurance proceeds related to Hurricane Katrina in 2007 that
did not recur in 2008. The remaining decrease was driven by a
decline in our operating income related to lower preneed
cemetery sales and net investment losses on our trust assets.
Also, during the fourth quarter of 2008 we began to see a
slowdown in preneed cash receipts.
Net cash provided by operating activities, excluding special
items, increased approximately $87 million in 2007 compared
to 2006. This increase includes additional cash flow and
synergies achieved related to the
23
Alderwoods acquisition as well as $26.1 million in trust
proceeds received from our reconciliation of the preneed funeral
and cemetery backlogs of Alderwoods. These increases were
partially offset by $42.4 million in additional interest
payments resulting from increased borrowings to finance the
Alderwoods acquisition and $29 million in additional cash
tax payments.
We paid approximately $20.1 million in income taxes in 2008
compared to approximately $44.5 million paid in 2007,
primarily as a result of lower taxable income in 2008 compared
to 2007. We did not pay federal income taxes in 2008 because of
net operating loss carryforwards. Our tax payment in 2007
increased $20.6 million from $15.6 million in 2006
primarily as a result of the additional taxable income generated
from our Alderwoods operations acquired at the end of 2006.
Investing Activities Investing activities
used net cash of $151.3 million in 2008 compared to
providing net cash flows of $378.1 million in 2007,
primarily due to a $527.4 million decrease in proceeds
generated from the divestiture of non-strategic assets. The
2007 net cash flows from investing activities of
$378.1 million represents a $1.7 billion change from
2006 primarily due to $1.3 billion used in 2006 for
acquisitions (primarily Alderwoods), offset by a
$327.5 million increase in proceeds from divestitures in
2007 compared to 2006.
In 2007, we completed the sale of Mayflower National Life
Insurance Company, Alderwoods former insurance subsidiary,
and we divested all of our properties required to be divested by
the FTC as a result of the Alderwoods acquisition. We also
received $4.7 million of proceeds held as an income tax
receivable related to the 2005 sale of our operations in Chile,
$1.9 million in cash proceeds related to the 2006 sale of
our operations in Singapore, and $144.0 million related to
the redemption of securities involving our former equity
investment in France.
In 2006, we acquired Alderwoods for $1.2 billion, including
refinancing of $357.7 million of Alderwoods debt. We also
received $11.0 million of proceeds held as an income tax
receivable related to the 2005 sale of our operations in Chile
and $10.6 million in cash proceeds from the fourth quarter
2006 sale of our operations in Singapore.
Financing Activities Cash flows from
financing activities used $230.5 million in 2008 compared
to using $607.5 million in 2007. This $377.0 million
net decrease in financing cash outflows in 2008 compared to 2007
was driven by a $363.0 million decrease in share
repurchases and a $472.5 million decrease in early
extinguishments of debt, partially offset by $38.1 million
lower proceeds from stock option exercises, an
$81.9 million increase in scheduled debt payments and
$310.4 million lower proceeds from the issuance of
long-term debt. Cash flows from financing activities used
$607.5 million in 2007 compared to generating
$565.2 million in 2006. This $1.2 billion net change
in financing cash flows in 2007 compared to 2006 was driven by
lower proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt, higher share
repurchases, and an increase in debt extinguishments.
Proceeds from long-term debt (net of debt issuance costs) were
$82.1 million in 2008 due to a $54.3 million drawdown
under our revolving credit facility and $27.8 million of
mortgage and other debentures. Proceeds from
long-term
debt (net of debt issuance costs) were $392.6 million in
2007 due to the issuance of $200 million of senior
unsecured 6.75% notes due 2015 and $200 million of
senior unsecured 7.50% notes due 2027. Proceeds from
long-term debt (net of debt issuance costs) were
$825.3 million in 2006 due to the issuance of
$250 million of senior unsecured 7.625% notes due
2018, $250 million of senior unsecured 7.375% notes
due 2014, $200 million of private placement offerings, and
a $150 million term loan.
Payments of debt in 2008 were $138.2 million due to the
repayment of our revolving credit facility of
$54.3 million, the repayment of $45.2 million of our
6.5% notes due March 2008, $12.8 million in other
scheduled debt payments, and $25.9 million in payments on
capital leases. Payments of debt in 2007 were
$528.8 million due to early extinguishments of
$472.5 million, the acceptance of the tender of
$13.5 million of our 6.875% notes due October 2007,
$3.7 million in scheduled debt payments, $27.1 million
in payments on capital leases, and $12.0 million of other
note payments. Payments of debt in 2006 were $228.9 million
due to early extinguishments of $181.5 million,
$26.1 million in scheduled debt payments, and
$21.3 million in payments on capital leases.
We repurchased 17.7 million shares of common stock for
$142.2 million in 2008, compared to 38.5 million
shares for $505.1 million in 2007 and 3.4 million
shares for $27.9 million in 2006.
24
We paid cash dividends of $41.5 million in 2008,
$34.6 million in 2007 and $29.4 million in 2006.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations, and Commercial and
Contingent Commitments
We have assumed various financial obligations and commitments in
the ordinary course of conducting our business. We have
contractual obligations requiring future cash payments under
existing contractual arrangements, such as debt maturities,
interest on long-term debt, operating lease agreements, and
employment, consulting, and non-competition agreements. We also
have commercial and contingent obligations that result in cash
payments only if certain events occur requiring our performance
pursuant to a funding commitment.
The following table details our known future cash payments (on
an undiscounted basis) related to various contractual
obligations as of December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010-2011
|
|
|
2012-2013
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Debt maturities(1)(2)
|
|
$
|
27.1
|
|
|
$
|
237.8
|
|
|
$
|
102.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,481.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,848.5
|
|
Interest obligation on long-term debt(3)
|
|
|
121.1
|
|
|
|
241.7
|
|
|
|
221.8
|
|
|
|
464.4
|
|
|
|
1,049.0
|
|
Operating lease agreements(4)
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
49.2
|
|
|
|
82.9
|
|
Employment, consulting, and non-competition agreements(5)
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$
|
163.1
|
|
|
$
|
498.6
|
|
|
$
|
337.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,997.7
|
|
|
$
|
2,996.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our outstanding indebtedness contains standard provisions, such
as payment delinquency default clauses and change of control
clauses. In addition, our bank credit agreement contains a
maximum leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio.
See Capital Allocation Considerations and
Note 10 in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data, for additional details related to our
long-term debt. |
|
(2) |
|
Included in
2010-2011 is
$28.7 million of 7.7% notes due April 2009 which we
intend to refinance on a long-term basis through the utilization
of our revolving credit facility that matures in November 2011.
See Note 10 in Part II, Item 8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data, for additional information
related to our revolving credit facility. |
|
(3) |
|
Approximately 87% of our total debt is fixed rate debt for which
the interest obligation was calculated at the stated rate.
Future interest obligations on our floating rate debt are based
on the current forward rate curve of the underlying index. See
Note 10 in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data, for additional information related to
our future interest obligations. |
|
(4) |
|
The majority of our lease arrangements contain options to
(i) purchase the property at fair value on the exercise
date, (ii) purchase the property for a value determined at
the inception of the leases, or (iii) renew for the fair
rental value at the end of the primary lease term. Our leases
primarily relate to funeral service locations and cemetery
operating and maintenance equipment. See Note 12 in
Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data, for additional details related to our leases. |
|
(5) |
|
We have entered into management employment, consulting, and
non-competition agreements that contractually require us to make
cash payments over the contractual period. The agreements have
been primarily entered into with certain officers and employees
and former owners of businesses acquired. Agreements with
contractual periods less than one year are excluded. See
Note 12 in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data, for additional details related to these
agreements. |
25
The following table details our known potential or possible
future cash payments (on an undiscounted basis) related to
various commercial and contingent obligations as of
December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiration by Period
|
|
Commercial and Contingent Obligations
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010-2011
|
|
|
2012-2013
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Surety obligations(1)
|
|
$
|
232.8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
232.8
|
|
Long-term obligations related to uncertain tax positions(2)
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
161.9
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
174.7
|
|
Letters of credit(3)
|
|
|
52.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52.7
|
|
Representations and warranties(4)
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
26.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and contingent obligations
|
|
$
|
300.5
|
|
|
$
|
188.7
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
$
|
492.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the aggregate funding obligation associated with our
surety bond arrangements. See the section titled Financial
Assurances following this table in this
Form 10-K
for more information related to our surety bonds. |
|
(2) |
|
We adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1,
2007. In accordance with the provisions of FIN 48, we have
recorded a liability for unrecognized tax benefits and related
interest and penalties of $174.7 million as of
December 31, 2008. See Note 9 in Part II,
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, for
additional information related to our uncertain tax positions. |
|
(3) |
|
We are occasionally required to post letters of credit, issued
by a financial institution, to secure certain insurance programs
or other obligations. Letters of credit generally authorize the
financial institution to make a payment to the beneficiary upon
the satisfaction of a certain event or the failure to satisfy an
obligation. The letters of credit are generally posted for
one-year terms and are usually automatically renewed upon
maturity until such time as we have satisfied the commitment
secured by the letter of credit. We are obligated to reimburse
the issuer only if the beneficiary collects on the letter of
credit. We believe it is unlikely we will be required to fund a
claim under our outstanding letters of credit. As of
December 31, 2008, the full amount of our letters of credit
was supported by our revolving credit facility which expires in
November 2011. |
|
(4) |
|
In addition to the letters of credit described above, we
currently have contingent obligations of $31.9 million
related to our asset sales and joint venture transactions. We
have agreed to guarantee certain representations and warranties
associated with such disposition transactions with letters of
credit or interest-bearing cash investments. We have
interest-bearing cash investments of $23.2 million included
in Deferred charges and other assets pledged as
collateral for certain of these contingent obligations. During
the year ended December 31, 2004, we recognized
$35.8 million of contractual obligations related to
representations and warranties associated with the disposition
of our funeral operations in France. The remaining obligations
of $20.8 million at December 31, 2008 are primarily
related to certain foreign taxes and litigation matters. This
amount is recorded in Other liabilities in our
consolidated balance sheet. See Note 12 in Part II,
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, for
additional information related to this obligation. |
Not included in the above table are potential funding
obligations related to our funeral and cemetery merchandise and
service trusts. In certain states and provinces, we have
withdrawn allowable distributable earnings including unrealized
gains prior to the maturity or cancellation of the related
contract. Additionally, some states have laws that either
require replenishment of investment losses under certain
circumstances or impose various restrictions when trust fund
values have dropped below certain prescribed amounts. In the
event that our trust investments do not recover from recent
market declines, we may be required to deposit portions or all
of these amounts into the respective trusts in some future
period. As of December 31, 2008, we had unrealized losses
of $19.8 million in the various trusts in these states.
26
Financial
Assurances
In support of our operations, we have entered into arrangements
with certain surety companies whereby such companies agree to
issue surety bonds on our behalf as financial assurance
and/or as
required by existing state and local regulations. The surety
bonds are used for various business purposes; however, the
majority of the surety bonds issued and outstanding have been
used to support our preneed funeral and cemetery sales
activities. The obligations underlying these surety bonds are
recorded on the consolidated balance sheet as Deferred
preneed funeral revenues and Deferred preneed cemetery
revenues. The breakdown of surety bonds between funeral and
cemetery preneed arrangements, as well as surety bonds for other
activities, is described below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Preneed funeral
|
|
$
|
130.6
|
|
|
$
|
134.9
|
|
Preneed cemetery:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merchandise and services
|
|
|
132.4
|
|
|
|
148.0
|
|
Pre-construction
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds supporting preneed funeral and cemetery obligations
|
|
|
265.9
|
|
|
|
289.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds supporting preneed business permits
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
Other bonds
|
|
|
17.7
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total surety bonds outstanding
|
|
$
|
288.7
|
|
|
$
|
303.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When selling preneed funeral and cemetery contracts, we may post
surety bonds where allowed by state law. We post the surety
bonds in lieu of trusting a certain amount of funds received
from the customer. The $265.9 million in bonds supporting
preneed funeral and cemetery obligations differs from the $232.8
potential funding obligation disclosed in our Commercial
and Contingent Obligations table above because the amount
of the bond posted is generally determined by the total amount
of the preneed contract that would otherwise be required to be
trusted, in accordance with applicable state law, at the time we
enter into the contract. We would only be required to fund the
trust for the portion of the preneed contract for which we have
received payment from the customer, less any applicable
retainage, in accordance with state law. For the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, we had
$29.5 million, $38.4 million, and $50.9 million,
respectively, of cash receipts attributable to bonded sales.
These amounts do not consider reductions associated with taxes,
obtaining costs, or other costs.
Surety bond premiums are paid annually and are automatically
renewable until maturity of the underlying preneed contracts,
unless we are given prior notice of cancellation. Except for
cemetery pre-construction bonds (which are irrevocable), the
surety companies generally have the right to cancel the surety
bonds at any time with appropriate notice. In the event a surety
company were to cancel the surety bond, we are required to
obtain replacement surety assurance from another surety company
or fund a trust for an amount generally less than the posted
bond amount. Management does not expect that we will be required
to fund material future amounts related to these surety bonds
due to a lack of surety capacity or surety company
non-performance.
Preneed
Funeral and Cemetery Activities and Backlog of
Contracts
In addition to selling our products and services to client
families at the time of need, we sell price-guaranteed preneed
funeral and cemetery contracts, which provide for future funeral
or cemetery services and merchandise. Since preneed funeral and
cemetery services or merchandise will not be provided until
sometime in the future, most states and provinces require that
all or a portion of the funds collected from customers on
preneed funeral and cemetery contracts be paid into merchandise
and service trusts until the merchandise is delivered or the
service is performed. In certain situations, as described above,
where permitted by state or provincial laws, we post a surety
bond as financial assurance for a certain amount of the preneed
funeral or cemetery contract in lieu of placing funds into trust
accounts. Our backlog of funeral and cemetery contracts shown
below represents the total amount of future revenues we have
under contract at the end of 2008 and 2007.
27
Trust-Funded Preneed Funeral and Cemetery
Contracts: The funds are deposited into trust and
invested by independent trustees in accordance with state and
provincial laws. We retain any funds above the amounts required
to be deposited into trust accounts and use them for working
capital purposes, generally to offset the selling and
administrative costs of our preneed programs.
Investment earnings associated with the trust investments are
expected to mitigate the inflationary costs of providing the
preneed funeral and cemetery services and merchandise in the
future for the prices that were guaranteed at the time of sale.
Our preneed funeral and cemetery trust assets are consolidated
and recorded in our consolidated balance sheet at fair market
value. Investment earnings on trust assets are generally
accumulated in the trust and distributed as the revenue
associated with the preneed funeral or cemetery contract is
recognized or cancelled by the customer. In certain states and
provinces, the trusts are allowed to distribute a portion of the
investment earnings to us prior to that date. See Recent
Volatility in Financial Markets for more information.
If a preneed funeral or cemetery contract is cancelled prior to
delivery, state or provincial law determines the amount of the
refund owed to the customer, if any, including the amount of the
attributed investment earnings. Upon cancellation, we receive
the amount of principal deposited to trust and previously
undistributed net investment earnings and, where required, issue
a refund to the customer. We retain excess funds, if any, and
recognize the attributed investment earnings (net of any
investment earnings payable to the customer) as revenues in our
consolidated statement of operations. In certain jurisdictions,
we may be obligated to fund any shortfall if the amounts
deposited by the customer exceed the funds in trust. Funds in
trust assets exceeded customer deposits at December 31,
2008. See Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, Contractual
Obligations, and Commercial and Contingent Commitments for
additional information about reasonably possible obligations
from trust assets. Based on our historical experience, we have
included a cancellation reserve for preneed funeral and cemetery
contracts in our consolidated balance sheet of
$137.8 million and $143.7 million as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The cash flow activity over the life of a trust-funded preneed
funeral or cemetery contract from the date of sale to its
recognition or cancellation is captured in the operating cash
flow line items (Increase) decrease in preneed receivables
and trust investments, Increase (decrease) in deferred preneed
revenue, Increase (decrease) in deferred preneed funeral and
cemetery receipts held in trust and Net income (loss)
in our consolidated statement of cash flows. While the
contract is outstanding, cash flow is provided by the amount
retained from funds collected from the customer and any
distributed investment earnings. At the time of death maturity,
we receive the principal and undistributed investment earnings
from the funeral trust and any remaining receivable due from the
customer. At the time of delivery or storage of cemetery
merchandise and service items for which we were required to
deposit funds to trust, we receive the principal and
undistributed investment earnings from the cemetery trust. There
is generally no remaining receivable due from the customer, as
our policy is to deliver preneed cemetery merchandise and
service items only upon payment of the contract balance in full.
This cash flow at the time of service, delivery, or storage is
generally less than the associated revenue recognized, thus
reducing cash flow from operating activities.
28
The tables below detail our North America results of preneed
funeral and cemetery production and maturities, excluding
insurance contracts, for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Funeral:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed trust-funded (including bonded):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production
|
|
$
|
152.8
|
|
|
$
|
148.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production (number of contracts)
|
|
|
30,320
|
|
|
|
30,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities
|
|
$
|
196.1
|
|
|
$
|
210.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities (number of contracts)
|
|
|
45,392
|
|
|
|
46,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed
|
|
$
|
358.9
|
|
|
$
|
399.3
|
|
Atneed
|
|
|
249.5
|
|
|
|
272.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales production
|
|
|
608.4
|
|
|
|
672.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production deferred to backlog:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed
|
|
$
|
148.0
|
|
|
$
|
169.7
|
|
Atneed
|
|
|
190.1
|
|
|
|
204.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales production deferred to backlog
|
|
|
338.1
|
|
|
|
374.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue recognized from backlog:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed
|
|
$
|
144.1
|
|
|
$
|
176.1
|
|
Atneed
|
|
|
196.7
|
|
|
|
203.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue recognized from backlog
|
|
|
340.8
|
|
|
|
379.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance-Funded Preneed Funeral
Contracts: Where permitted by state or provincial
law, customers may arrange their preneed funeral contract by
purchasing a life insurance or annuity policy from third-party
insurance companies, for which we earn a commission as general
sales agent for the insurance company. These general agency
commissions (GA revenues) are based on a percentage per contract
sold and are recognized as funeral revenues when the insurance
purchase transaction between the customer and third-party
insurance provider is completed. Direct selling costs incurred
pursuant to the sale of insurance-funded preneed funeral
contracts are expensed as incurred. The policy amount of the
insurance contract between the customer and the third-party
insurance company generally equals the amount of the preneed
funeral contract. We do not reflect the unfulfilled
insurance-funded preneed funeral contract amounts in our
consolidated balance sheet. Approximately 66% of our North
America preneed funeral production in 2008 relates to
insurance-funded preneed funeral contracts.
The third-party insurance company collects funds related to the
insurance contract directly from the customer. The life
insurance contracts include a death benefit escalation
provision, which is expected to offset the inflationary costs of
providing the preneed funeral services and merchandise in the
future at the prices that were guaranteed at the time of the
preneed sale. The customer/policy holder assigns the policy
benefits to our funeral home to pay for the preneed funeral
contract at the time of need.
Additionally, we may receive cash overrides based on achieving
certain dollar volume targets of life insurance policies sold as
a result of marketing agreements entered into in connection with
the sale of our insurance subsidiaries in 2000. Included in GA
revenues for 2008 and 2007 were cash overrides in the amount of
$8.5 million and $7.2 million, respectively.
29
The table below details the North America results of
insurance-funded preneed funeral production and maturities for
the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the number
of contracts associated with those transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Preneed funeral insurance-funded(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production
|
|
$
|
296.2
|
|
|
$
|
285.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production (number of contracts)
|
|
|
49,381
|
|
|
|
50,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General agency revenue
|
|
$
|
51.5
|
|
|
$
|
44.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities
|
|
$
|
250.5
|
|
|
$
|
241.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities (number of contracts)
|
|
|
47,890
|
|
|
|
51,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts are not included in our consolidated balance sheet. |
30
North America Backlog of Preneed Funeral and Cemetery
Contracts: The following table reflects our North
America backlog of trust-funded deferred preneed funeral and
cemetery contract revenues, including amounts related to
Deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust
at December 31, 2008 and 2007. Additionally, the table
reflects our North America backlog of unfulfilled
insurance-funded contracts (which are not included in our
consolidated balance sheet) at December 31, 2008 and 2007.
The backlog amounts presented are reduced by an amount that we
believe will cancel before maturity based on historical
experience.
The table also reflects our North America preneed funeral and
cemetery receivables and trust investments (market and cost
bases) associated with the backlog of deferred preneed funeral
and cemetery contract revenues, net of the estimated
cancellation allowance. We believe that the table below is
meaningful because it sets forth the aggregate amount of future
revenues we expect to recognize as a result of preneed sales, as
well as the amount of assets associated with those revenues.
Because the future revenues exceed the asset amounts, future
revenues will exceed the cash distributions actually received
from the associated trusts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in billions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred preneed funeral revenues
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
Deferred preneed funeral receipts held in trust
|
|
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
1.24
|
|
|
|
1.24
|
|
|
|
1.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.59
|
|
|
$
|
1.83
|
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
|
$
|
1.79
|
|
Allowance for cancellation on trust investments
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog of trust-funded preneed funeral revenues
|
|
$
|
1.48
|
|
|
$
|
1.72
|
|
|
$
|
1.64
|
|
|
$
|
1.66
|
|
Backlog of insurance-funded preneed funeral revenues
|
|
|
3.30
|
|
|
|
3.30
|
|
|
|
3.36
|
|
|
|
3.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total backlog of preneed funeral revenues
|
|
$
|
4.78
|
|
|
$
|
5.02
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
$
|
5.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments
|
|
$
|
1.19
|
|
|
$
|
1.43
|
|
|
$
|
1.43
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
Allowance for cancellation on trust investments
|
|
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets associated with backlog of trust-funded deferred preneed
funeral revenues, net of estimated allowance for cancellation
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
$
|
1.28
|
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
$
|
1.34
|
|
Insurance policies associated with insurance-funded deferred
preneed funeral revenues, net of estimated allowance for
cancellation
|
|
|
3.30
|
|
|
|
3.30
|
|
|
|
3.36
|
|
|
|
3.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets associated with backlog of preneed funeral revenues
|
|
$
|
4.34
|
|
|
$
|
4.58
|
|
|
$
|
4.68
|
|
|
$
|
4.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred preneed cemetery revenues
|
|
$
|
0.77
|
|
|
$
|
0.77
|
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
Deferred preneed cemetery receipts held in trust
|
|
|
0.82
|
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
|
|
1.15
|
|
|
|
1.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.59
|
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
|
$
|
1.90
|
|
|
$
|
1.87
|
|
Allowance for cancellation on trust investments
|
|
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog of deferred cemetery revenues
|
|
$
|
1.46
|
|
|
$
|
1.75
|
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
|
$
|
1.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
$
|
1.35
|
|
|
$
|
1.43
|
|
|
$
|
1.40
|
|
Allowance for cancellation on trust investments
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets associated with backlog of deferred cemetery revenues,
net of estimated allowance for cancellation
|
|
$
|
0.95
|
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
|
$
|
1.28
|
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The market value of our funeral and cemetery trust investments
was based on a combination of quoted market prices, observable
inputs such as interest rates or yield curves, and appraisals.
For more information on how market values are estimated, see
Critical Accounting Policies, Recent Accounting Pronouncements,
and Accounting
31
Changes below. The difference between the backlog and asset
amounts represents the contracts for which we have posted surety
bonds as financial assurance in lieu of trusting, the amounts
collected from customers that were not required to be deposited
into trust, and allowable cash distributions from trust assets.
The table also reflects the amounts expected to be received from
insurance companies through the assignment of policy proceeds
related to insurance-funded funeral contracts.
Results
of Operations Years Ended December 31, 2008,
2007, and 2006
Management
Summary
Key highlights in 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues decreased $129.7 million, or 5.7%, as a result of
approximately $100 million in lost revenue from significant
divestiture activity throughout 2007 and a $13.0 million
decline in preneed cemetery property sales.
|
|
|
|
Despite a difficult economic environment, our comparable funeral
segment demonstrated significant stability with modest growth in
profits and margins and a 3.4% increase in average revenue per
funeral service; comparable funeral services decreased 2.7%.
|
|
|
|
Due to the recent adverse conditions in the financial markets,
our funeral trust fund income declined $8.3 million and
cemetery merchandise and services and perpetual care trust fund
income declined $25.5 million in 2008 compared to 2007.
|
Consolidated
Fourth Quarter Results
During the fourth quarter of 2008, funeral revenues declined
$14.5 million, or 3.9%, to $356.4 million from
$370.9 million in the same period in 2007 primarily as a
result of the divestiture of several locations that contributed
an incremental $8.6 million of revenue in the fourth
quarter of 2007. Additionally, we experienced a
$4.8 million decline in trust fund income recognized on
matured preneed contracts. Despite the decline in revenues,
funeral gross profit increased $1.4 million, or 2.0%, due
to declines in variable costs, employee-related costs, and
general liability insurance expenses. Our gross margin
percentage increased to 20.4% compared to 19.2% in 2007.
Cemetery revenues declined $41.5 million, or 20.5%, from
$202.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2007 to
$160.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2008 due to an
$19.9 million decline in property sales, a
$5.5 million decline in new cemetery property construction
revenue, and an $11.8 million decrease in trust fund
income. Additionally, we divested several locations that
contributed an incremental $7.8 million in revenue in the
fourth quarter of 2007. Cemetery gross profit decreased
$29.8 million, or 60.9%, and our gross margin percentage
decreased to 11.9% compared to 24.2% due to the revenue declines
described above which were only partially offset by lower
variable costs.
Operating income decreased $29.0 million, or 32.3%, to
$60.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2008 from
$89.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2007. This decrease
in operating income was primarily due to the decline in revenue
discussed in the preceding paragraphs, partially offset by a
$13.7 million decrease in general administrative expenses.
Results
of Operations Years Ended December 31, 2008,
2007, and 2006
In 2008, we reported consolidated net income of
$97.1 million ($.37 per diluted share) compared to net
income in 2007 of $247.7 million ($.85 per diluted share)
and net income in 2006 of $56.5 million ($.19 per diluted
share). These results were impacted by certain significant items
that decreased earnings, including:
|
|
|
after-tax charges of $1.9 million related to Hurricane Ike
losses in 2008;
|
|
|
net after-tax losses on asset sales of $36.0 million in
2008 and $50.1 million in 2006;
|
|
|
after-tax losses from the early extinguishment of debt of
$8.7 million in 2007 and $10.7 million in 2006;
|
32
|
|
|
after-tax expenses related to our acquisition and integration of
Alderwoods of $0.7 million in 2008, $16.5 million in
2007 and $4.3 million in 2006;
|
|
|
after-tax expenses related to our Alderwoods bridge financing of
$3.9 million in 2006; and
|
|
|
after-tax expenses to settle our Cash Balance pension plan of
$6.5 million in 2007.
|
Significant items that increased earnings included:
|
|
|
after-tax earnings from discontinued operations of
$4.4 million in 2007 and $3.9 million in 2006;
|
|
|
net after-tax gain from the sale of assets of $6.0 million
in 2007;
|
|
|
after-tax gain on the redemption of securities related to our
former equity investment in France of $99.8 million in
2007; and
|
|
|
after-tax gain on the sale of our equity investment in France of
$17.6 million in 2007.
|
Consolidated
Versus Comparable Results Years Ended
December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006
The table below reconciles our consolidated GAAP results to our
comparable, or same store, results for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006. We define
comparable operations (or same store operations) as those
funeral and cemetery locations owned by us for the entire period
beginning January 1, 2007 and ending December 31,
2008. The following tables present operating results for funeral
and cemetery locations that were owned by us for these years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associated with
|
|
|
Associated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition/New
|
|
|
with
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Dispositions
|
|
|
Comparable
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
North America Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue
|
|
$
|
1,468.7
|
|
|
$
|
16.4
|
|
|
$
|
8.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,444.0
|
|
Cemetery revenue
|
|
|
679.9
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
673.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,148.6
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
2,117.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
2,155.6
|
|
|
$
|
22.5
|
|
|
$
|
8.7
|
|
|
$
|
2,124.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America Gross Profits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits
|
|
$
|
312.6
|
|
|
$
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
316.3
|
|
Cemetery gross profits
|
|
|
105.9
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
105.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
418.5
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
|
422.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany Gross Profits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profits
|
|
$
|
418.8
|
|
|
$
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
422.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associated with
|
|
|
Associated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition/New
|
|
|
with
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Dispositions
|
|
|
Comparable
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
North America Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue
|
|
$
|
1,518.3
|
|
|
$
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
92.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,426.3
|
|
Cemetery revenue
|
|
|
760.0
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
38.7
|
|
|
|
721.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,278.3
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
131.2
|
|
|
|
2,147.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
2,285.3
|
|
|
$
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
131.2
|
|
|
$
|
2,154.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America Gross Profits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits
|
|
$
|
307.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.8
|
|
|
$
|
303.5
|
|
Cemetery gross profits
|
|
|
159.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
156.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
466.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
460.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany Gross Profits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profits
|
|
$
|
466.8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6.2
|
|
|
$
|
460.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associated with
|
|
|
Associated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition/New
|
|
|
with
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Dispositions
|
|
|
Comparable
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
North America Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue
|
|
$
|
1,155.3
|
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
94.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,061.0
|
|
Cemetery revenue
|
|
|
591.1
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
41.8
|
|
|
|
549.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,746.4
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
136.2
|
|
|
|
1,610.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
1,752.9
|
|
|
$
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
136.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,616.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America Gross Profits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits
|
|
$
|
240.1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.5
|
|
|
$
|
236.6
|
|
Cemetery gross profits
|
|
|
107.5
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
106.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
347.6
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
342.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany Gross Profits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profits
|
|
$
|
348.0
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
4.6
|
|
|
$
|
343.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
The following table provides the data necessary to calculate our
consolidated average revenue per funeral service for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006. We calculate
average revenue per funeral service by dividing consolidated
funeral revenue, excluding General Agency (GA) revenues and
certain other revenues to avoid distorting our averages of
normal funeral services revenue, by the number of funeral
services performed during the period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except average revenue per funeral
service)
|
|
|
Consolidated funeral revenue
|
|
$
|
1,475.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,525.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,161.8
|
|
Less: GA revenues
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
|
|
44.8
|
|
|
|
35.1
|
|
Less: Other revenues
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Consolidated funeral revenue
|
|
$
|
1,414.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,468.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,114.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated funeral services performed
|
|
|
278,165
|
|
|
|
299,801
|
|
|
|
235,384
|
|
Consolidated average revenue per funeral service
|
|
$
|
5,084
|
|
|
$
|
4,897
|
|
|
$
|
4,734
|
|
The following table provides the data necessary to calculate our
comparable average revenue per funeral service for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006. We calculate
average revenue per funeral service by dividing comparable
funeral revenue, excluding General Agency (GA) revenues and
other revenues to avoid distorting our averages of normal
funeral services revenue, by the comparable number of funeral
services performed during the period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except average revenue per funeral
service)
|
|
|
Comparable funeral revenue
|
|
$
|
1,451.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,433.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,067.5
|
|
Less: GA revenues
|
|
|
51.4
|
|
|
|
43.1
|
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
Less: Other revenues
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Comparable funeral revenue
|
|
$
|
1,390.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,381.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,026.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable funeral services performed
|
|
|
272,693
|
|
|
|
280,290
|
|
|
|
214,773
|
|
Comparable average revenue per funeral service
|
|
$
|
5,097
|
|
|
$
|
4,928
|
|
|
$
|
4,779
|
|
Funeral
Results
Funeral
Revenue
Consolidated revenues from funeral operations were
$1,475.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008
compared to $1,525.3 million in the same period of 2007.
This decrease is primarily due to the divestiture of
non-strategic assets throughout 2007, which resulted in a
decrease of $84.2 million of revenue in 2008, partially
offset by acquisitions that contributed an additional
$16.9 million of revenue and a 3.8% increase in average
revenue per funeral service. Our comparable funeral revenues
increased $17.7 million, or 1.2%, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2007 primarily driven by a 3.4% increase
in comparable average revenue per funeral service, which more
than offset a 2.7% decline in the number of funeral services
performed and a $6.0 million decline in trust fund income.
Consolidated revenue from funeral operations increased
$363.5 million in 2007 compared to 2006. Comparable funeral
revenues in 2007 increased $365.8 million, or 34.3% over
2006. The increase was primarily driven by our operations
acquired from Alderwoods, which contributed $349.6 million
in funeral revenues, and continued benefits of our strategic
pricing initiatives at legacy locations. This was partially
offset by a $1.9 million decline in revenue from divested
locations.
Funeral
Services Performed
Our consolidated funeral services performed decreased 21,636, or
7.2%, in the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the
same period in 2007. This decrease was primarily due to our
planned 2007 divestiture of non-
35
strategic assets, which contributed an incremental 17,990
funeral services in 2007, partially offset by an incremental
3,951 funeral services from acquisitions in 2008. Our comparable
funeral services performed decreased 7,597, or 2.7%, primarily
due to the implementation of our strategic pricing initiative at
former Alderwoods locations discussed below. We have seen a
recent stabilization in the cremation trend for our businesses
as our strategic pricing initiative and discounting policies
have resulted in a decline in highly-discounted, low-service
cremation customers. Our comparable cremation rate of 41.9% in
2008 increased only slightly from 41.4% in 2007. Our comparable
cremation rate of 41.4% in 2007 increased from 40.3% in 2006. We
continue to expand our cremation memorialization products and
services, which have resulted in higher average sales for
cremation services.
Average
Revenue Per Funeral Service
Our consolidated average revenue per funeral service increased
$187, or 3.8%, in the year ended December 31, 2008 compared
to the same period of 2007. Our comparable average revenue per
funeral service increased 3.4%, or $169 per funeral service,
reflecting the continued benefits from our strategic pricing
initiative, which was implemented at former Alderwoods locations
throughout 2007. Pursuant to this strategy, we have realigned
our pricing focus away from our products to our service
offerings, reflecting our competitive advantage and
concentrating on services that our customers believe add the
most value. This strategy has resulted in a decline in highly
discounted, low-service cremation funeral services. These
initiatives, although reducing our funeral services volume, have
generated improvements in average revenue per funeral service
and increased profitability. We expect that we have seen the
full benefit of these initiatives by the end of 2008. However,
we believe we can continue to generate increases in our average
revenue per funeral service (although much smaller than in
2008) through inflationary price increases.
Funeral
Gross Profit
Consolidated funeral gross profits increased $5.4 million
in 2008 as compared to 2007, despite the divestiture of
non-strategic assets that contributed an incremental
$5.5 million of gross profit in 2007 compared to 2008. The
consolidated gross margin percentage increased to 21.2% from
20.2%. Gross profit from our comparable funeral locations
increased $12.9 million, or 4.2%, in 2008 compared to 2007
primarily as a result of the increase in comparable revenue
described above.
Consolidated funeral gross profits increased $67.0 million
in 2007 as compared to 2006. Gross profit from our comparable
funeral locations increased $66.7 million, or 28.1%, and
our comparable gross margin percentage decreased to 21.2% from
22.2% in 2007 compared to 2006. Comparable gross profits before
allocation of corporate and field overhead costs increased
$90.1 million, or 29.0%. The increase was primarily driven
by our operations acquired from Alderwoods, which contributed
$81.4 million in funeral gross profit. Our corporate and
field overhead includes costs related to the addition of the
former Alderwoods funeral homes and cemeteries. We do not
separately identify and allocate these additional overhead
costs; therefore, the negative impact is reflected in our gross
profit and gross margin percentage for 2007 on a comparable
basis compared to 2006. This increase was partially offset by a
$0.3 million decline in gross profit from divested
locations.
Cemetery
Results
Cemetery
Revenue
Consolidated revenues from our cemetery operations decreased
$80.1 million in 2008 compared to 2007. Comparable cemetery
revenue decreased $48.0 million, or 6.7%, in 2008 compared
to 2007. This decrease primarily resulted from a
$28.8 million decline in preneed cemetery property revenue
in 2008 compared to 2007 as several large non-recurring
construction projects were completed in 2007, a
$14.3 million decrease in preneed cemetery trust fund
income, and an $8.4 million decrease in cemetery perpetual
care trust fund income. Revenues from divested locations
decreased $38.3 million from the divestiture of
non-strategic assets, partially offset by acquisitions, which
contributed an additional $6.2 million of revenue.
Consolidated revenues from our cemetery operations increased
$168.9 million, or 28.6%, in 2007 compared to 2006. Our
comparable cemetery revenues grew $172.0 million, or 31.3%,
in 2007 compared to 2006, reflecting an increase from operations
acquired from Alderwoods, which contributed $154.8 million
in cemetery revenues and
36
our tiered-product strategy, which focused on the development of
high-end cemetery property. This increase was partially offset
by a $3.1 million decline in revenue from divested
locations.
Cemetery
Gross Profits
Consolidated cemetery gross profit decreased $53.4 million,
or 33.5%, in 2008 compared to 2007. Consolidated cemetery gross
margin percentage decreased to 15.6% in 2008 compared to 21.0%
in 2007. Gross profit from our comparable cemetery locations
decreased $51.0 million, or 32.5%, in 2008 compared to 2007
primarily as a result of the decrease in comparable revenue
described above. Gross profit from divested locations decreased
$3.4 million from the divestiture of non-strategic assets
throughout 2007, partially offset by acquisitions that
contributed an additional $1.0 million of gross profit. We
experienced a $9.0 million reduction in administrative and
overhead costs as synergies from the Alderwoods acquisition were
realized. These decreases were more than offset by increased
maintenance costs, including energy-related costs and increased
commissions.
Consolidated cemetery gross profit increased $51.8 million,
or 48.2%, in 2007 compared to 2006. Consolidated cemetery gross
margin percentage grew to 21.0% in 2007 compared to 18.2% in
2006. Our comparable cemetery gross profit increased
$50.6 million, or 47.6%, in 2007 compared to 2006
reflecting an increase from operations acquired from Alderwoods,
which contributed $41.0 million in cemetery gross profit,
partially offset by the receipt and recognition of
$7.9 million of endowment care trust fund income in 2006.
The comparable cemetery margin percentage was 21.7% in 2007
compared to 19.3% in 2006. Gross profit from divested locations
increased $1.3 million in 2007 compared to 2006.
Other
Financial Statement Items
General
and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses were $87.4 million in
2008 compared to $135.8 million in 2007 and
$92.6 million in 2006. For 2008 compared to 2007, general
and administrative costs decreased $48.4 million primarily
due to $27.2 million of transition and other expenses
related to the acquisition of Alderwoods incurred in 2007,
$11.2 million of costs to terminate our pension plan
incurred in 2007, and a $13.6 million decrease in our
employee benefits expense related to reductions in corporate
bonuses and long-term incentive plans. For 2007 compared to
2006, general and administrative costs increased
$43.2 million primarily due to Alderwoods integration costs
of $28.4 million and pension termination costs discussed
above.
Gains
(Losses) on Divestitures and Impairment Charges, Net
In 2008, we recognized a $36.1 million net pre-tax loss on
asset divestitures and impairments. This loss was primarily due
to the impairments and asset divestitures associated with
non-strategic funeral and cemetery businesses in the United
States and Canada, including a $3.8 million impairment
charge of our trademark and tradenames and a $13.9 million
impairment of certain assets located in Oregon, West Virginia,
Michigan, Alabama, and Georgia, which are classified as assets
held for sale at December 31, 2008.
In 2007, we recognized a $16.9 million net pre-tax gain on
asset divestitures and impairments. This gain was primarily
associated with the disposition of funeral and cemetery
businesses in the United States and Canada, including a
$21.8 million gain on assets sold to StoneMor Partners LP
and a $21.1 million gain from real estate dispositions,
partially offset by $26.0 million in losses on FTC and
non-strategic divestitures.
In 2006, we recognized a $58.7 million net pre-tax loss on
asset divestitures and impairments. This loss was primarily
associated with the disposition of underperforming funeral and
cemetery businesses in United States and Canada, including a
$16.6 million impairment of assets sold to StoneMor
Partners LP in 2006 and a $26.4 million impairment of
certain assets in Michigan for which we had commenced a plan to
sell and which were classified as assets held for sale at
December 31, 2006. Additionally, in connection with the
Alderwoods acquisition, we entered into a consent agreement with
the Federal Trade Commission to divest certain of our
non-Alderwoods properties, and we recorded an impairment charge
of $12.9 million for these properties owned by us and
classified as assets held for sale at December 31, 2006.
37
Hurricane
Expense, Net
Hurricane expense, net reflects $3.1 million in property
damages incurred at various locations caused by Hurricane Ike in
September 2008, net of estimated insurance recoveries of
$2.5 million.
Interest
Expense
Interest expense decreased $12.6 million to
$134.3 million in 2008 compared to $146.9 million in
2007. The decrease in interest expense resulted primarily from
the $100 million repayment of our term loan, prepayment of
$50 million Series A Senior Notes, the
$45.2 million payment of our 6.5% notes due March
2008, and a decrease in rates associated with our floating rate
debt, mainly our Series B Senior Notes due November 2011.
Interest expense increased $23.5 million to
$146.9 million in 2007 compared to $123.4 million in
2006. The $23.5 million increase in interest expense
between 2007 and 2006 resulted primarily from an incremental
$31.5 million of interest costs related to our increased
borrowings to finance the Alderwoods transaction.
Interest
Income
Interest income of $5.4 million in 2008, a
$6.3 million decrease from 2007, reflects the decrease in
our average cash balances throughout 2008 coupled with a decline
in interest rates.
Interest income of $11.7 million in 2007, compared to
$31.2 million in 2006, reflects the decrease in our cash
balance as a result of the acquisition of Alderwoods.
Loss on
Early Extinguishment of Debt
During 2007, we repaid $100.0 million of our term loan and
$50 million of our Series A Senior Notes, and we
purchased $149.8 million aggregate principal amount of our
6.50% Notes due 2008 and $173.8 million aggregate
principal amount of our 7.70% Notes due 2009 in a tender
offer. As a result of these transactions, we recognized a loss
of $15.0 million, which represents the write-off of
unamortized deferred loan costs of $3.3 million, a
$1.0 million loss on a related interest rate hedge, and
$10.7 million in premiums paid to extinguish the debt.
During 2006, we repurchased $139.0 million aggregate
principal amount of our 7.7% notes due 2009 in a tender
offer and prepaid $50.0 million of our term loan in
December 2006. As a result of these transactions, we recognized
a loss of $17.5 million, which comprised the redemption
premiums paid of $8.2 million and the write-off of
unamortized deferred loan costs of $9.3 million.
Equity in
Earnings of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
Equity income from our equity investment in France was
$36.6 million in 2007 compared to $1.1 million in
2006. This increase was primarily attributable to equity
earnings generated by the sale of our former equity
investments business operations in the fourth quarter of
2007.
Gain on
Redemption of Securities
Gain on redemption of securities was $158.1 million in 2007
compared to $10.9 million in 2006. The 2007 and 2006 income
is primarily related to the redemption of our convertible
preferred equity certificates in our former equity investment in
France. This investment was liquidated in the fourth quarter of
2007. See Note 19 in Part II,
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,
for further information.
Other
(Expense) Income, Net
Other expense, net was a $0.6 million expense in 2008
compared to a $3.8 million expense in 2007, primarily due
to $0.6 million in unfavorable adjustments to our notes
receivable allowance in 2007, a decrease in our surety bond
expense of $1.7 million in 2008, and a $0.8 million
increase in foreign exchange loss in 2008 compared to 2007 as a
result of the recent decline in Canadian and Euro currencies.
38
Other expense, net was a $3.8 million expense in 2007
compared to a $1.5 million expense in 2006, primarily due
to a an incremental $2.6 million in unfavorable adjustments
to our notes receivable allowance in 2007.
Provision
for Income Taxes
The 2008 consolidated effective tax rate was 40.3%, compared to
37.1% and 46.0% in 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase in
the effective rate from 2007 to 2008 was primarily due to 2007
utilization of capital losses subject to valuation allowances.
During the fourth quarter of 2007, we generated taxable capital
gains from the sale of our former equity investment in France,
which allowed us to recognize the benefit of capital loss
carryforwards that we had previously concluded were more likely
than not to expire unutilized. The 2008, 2007, and 2006 tax
rates were negatively impacted by permanent differences between
the book and tax bases of North American asset divestitures
and certain other adjustments related to prior periods. See
Note 1 in Part II, Item 8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data, for further discussion.
Weighted
Average Shares
The diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding was
260.4 million in 2008, compared to 290.4 million in
2007 and 297.4 million in 2006. The decrease in all years
reflects shares repurchased under our share repurchase program.
Critical
Accounting Policies, Recent Accounting Pronouncements, and
Accounting Changes
Our consolidated financial statements are impacted by the
accounting policies used and the estimates and assumptions made
by management during their preparation. See Note 2 in
Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data, for more information. Estimates and
assumptions affect the carrying values of assets and liabilities
and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the
balance sheet date. Actual results could differ from such
estimates due to uncertainties associated with the methods and
assumptions underlying our critical accounting measurements. The
following is a discussion of our critical accounting policies
pertaining to revenue recognition, business combinations,
valuation of goodwill, valuation of intangible assets, valuation
of long-lived assets, loss contract analysis, the use of
estimates, and fair value measurements.
Revenue
Recognition
Funeral revenue is recognized when funeral services are
performed. Our trade receivables primarily consist of amounts
due for funeral services already performed. Revenue associated
with cemetery merchandise and services is recognized when the
service is performed or merchandise is delivered. Revenue
associated with cemetery property interment rights is recognized
in accordance with the retail land sales provision of
SFAS No. 66, Accounting for the Sales of Real
Estate (SFAS 66). Under SFAS 66, revenue
from constructed cemetery property is not recognized until a
minimum percentage (10%) of the sales price has been collected.
Revenue related to the preneed sale of unconstructed cemetery
property is deferred until it is constructed and at least 10% of
the sales price is collected.
When a customer enters into a preneed funeral trust contract,
the entire purchase price is deferred and the revenue is
recognized at the time of maturity. The revenues associated with
a preneed cemetery contract, however, may be recognized as
different contract events occur. Preneed sales of cemetery
interment rights (cemetery burial property) are recognized when
a minimum of 10% of the sales price has been collected and the
property has been constructed or is available for interment. For
services and non-personalized merchandise (such as vaults), we
defer the revenues until the services are performed and the
merchandise is delivered. For personalized marker merchandise,
with the customers direction generally obtained at the
time of sale, we can choose to order, store, and transfer title
to the customer. Upon the earlier of vendor storage of these
items or delivery in our cemetery, we recognize the associated
revenues and record the cost of sale. In situations in which we
have no further obligation or involvement related to the
merchandise, we recognize revenues and record the cost of sales
in accordance with SAB 104 upon the earlier of vendor
storage of these items or delivery in our cemetery.
39
Business
Combinations
We have applied the principles provided in
SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations
(SFAS 141) to our prior business combinations.
Tangible and intangible assets and liabilities assumed were
recorded at their fair value and goodwill recognized for any
difference between the price of the acquisition and our fair
value determination. We have customarily estimated our purchase
costs and other related transactions known to us at closing of
the acquisition. To the extent that information was not
available to us at the closing date and subsequently became
available during the allocation period, as defined by
SFAS 141, we have adjusted our goodwill, assets, or
liabilities associated with the acquisition. These changes are
disclosed in future reports as they occur. See Note 3 in
Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data, for discussion of Recent Accounting
Pronouncements which will affect how we account for Business
Combinations effective January 1, 2009.
Valuation
of Goodwill
We record the excess of purchase price over the fair value of
identifiable net assets acquired in business combinations as
goodwill. Goodwill is tested annually for impairment by
assessing the fair value of each of our reporting units. As of
December 31, 2008, our funeral segment reporting unit
includes assets in North America and Germany. Our cemetery
segment reporting unit includes assets in North America. We test
for impairment of goodwill in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS 142) annually during the fourth quarter
using information as of September 30.
Our goodwill impairment test involves estimates and management
judgment. In the first step of our goodwill impairment test, we
compare the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying
amount, including goodwill. We determine fair value of each
reporting unit using both a market and income approach. Our
methodology considers discounted cash flows and multiples of
EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and
amortization) for both SCI and its competitors. The discounted
cash flow valuation uses projections of future cash flows and
includes assumptions concerning future operating performance and
economic conditions that may differ from actual future cash
flows. We do not record an impairment of goodwill in instances
where the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying
amount. If the aggregate fair value is less than the related
carrying amount for a reporting unit, we compare the implied
fair value of goodwill (as defined in SFAS 142) to the
carrying amount of goodwill. If the carrying amount of reporting
unit goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill,
an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that
excess. Based on our most recent annual impairment test
performed during the fourth quarter using September 30
information, we concluded that there was no impairment of
goodwill as of December 31, 2008.
In addition to our annual review, we assess the impairment of
goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying value may be greater than fair value. Factors
that could trigger an interim impairment review include, but are
not limited to, significant underperformance relative to
historical or projected future operating results and significant
negative industry or economic trends. In the fourth quarter of
2008, we determined that the decline in our operating results,
combined with significant declines in the economy, resulted in a
triggering event that occurred subsequent to our annual
impairment test of goodwill. We performed an additional
impairment test based on December 31, 2008 information and
concluded that there was no impairment of goodwill. However, if
current economic conditions worsen causing further deterioration
in our operating results, we may have another triggering event
that could result in an impairment to our goodwill. Our cemetery
segment, which has a goodwill balance of $54.8 million as
of December 31, 2008, is more sensitive to market
conditions and goodwill impairments because it is more reliant
on preneed sales which are impacted by customer discretionary
spending.
For our most recent annual impairment test performed in the
fourth quarter using September 30 data, we used growth rates
ranging from (2.0) to 5.3% over a three-year period, plus a
terminal value determined using the constant growth method, in
projecting our future cash flows. We considered the impact of
recent realized losses in our trusts in developing our projected
cash flows. We used a 10.3% discount rate which reflected our
weighted average cost of capital based on our industry and our
supplier industries and capital structure, as adjusted for
equity risk premiums and size risk premiums based on our market
capitalization. Fair value was calculated as the sum of the
projected discounted cash flows of our reporting units over the
next three years plus terminal value at the end of those three
years. Our terminal value was calculated using a long-term
growth rate of 3.0%.
40
For our December 31 impairment test, we used growth rates
ranging from (7.5) to 6.1% over a
five-year
period, plus a terminal value determined using the constant
growth method. We considered the impact of recent realized
losses in our trusts in developing our projected cash flows. We
used an 11.0% discount rate, which reflects our current weighted
average cost of capital determined based on our industry and our
supplier industries and capital structure as adjusted for equity
risk premiums and size risk premiums based on our market
capitalization. Fair value was calculated as the sum of the
projected discounted cash flows of the reporting units over the
next five years plus terminal value. Our terminal value used a
long-term growth rate of 3.0%.
Valuation
of Intangible Assets
Our intangible assets include cemetery customer relationships,
trademarks and tradenames, and other assets primarily resulting
from our acquisition of Alderwoods. Our trademark and tradenames
and water rights assets are considered to have an indefinite
life and are not subject to amortization. We test for impairment
of intangible assets in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142 Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142) annually
during the fourth quarter using information as of
September 30.
Our intangible assets impairment tests involve estimates and
management judgment. For trademark and tradenames, our test uses
the relief from royalty method whereby we determine the fair
value of the assets by discounted the cash flows that represent
a savings over having to pay a royalty fee for use of the
trademark and tradenames. The discounted cash flow valuation
uses projections of future cash flows and includes assumptions
concerning future operating performance and economic conditions
that may differ from actual future cash flows. For our most
recent annual impairment test performed in the fourth quarter
using September 30 data, we estimated that the pre-tax savings
would be 4% of the revenues associated with the trademark and
tradenames, based primarily on our research of intellectual
property valuation and licensing databases. We also assumed a
terminal growth rate of 3.0% and discounted the cash flows at
10.5% based on the relative risk of these assets to our overall
business. Based on our annual impairment test performed during
the fourth quarter using September 30 information, we concluded
there was no impairment of intangible assets as of
December 31, 2008.
In addition to our annual review, we assess the impairment of
intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value may be greater than the fair
value. Factors that could trigger an interim impairment review
include, but are not limited to, significant underperformance
relative to historical or projected future operating results and
significant negative industry or economic trends. In the fourth
quarter of 2008, we determined that the decline in our operating
results, combined with significant declines in the economy,
resulted in a triggering event that occurred subsequent to our
annual impairment test of intangible assets. We performed an
additional impairment test based on December 31, 2008
information and concluded that there was an impairment of our
trademark and tradenames asset of $3.8 million. For this
additional impairment test, we estimated that the pre-tax
savings would be 4% of the revenues associated with the
trademark and tradenames, based primarily on our research of
intellectual property valuation and licensing databases. We also
assumed a terminal growth rate of 3.0% and discounted the cash
flows at 11.2% based on the relative risk of these assets to our
overall business. If the current economic conditions worsen,
causing further deterioration in our operating results, we may
have another triggering event which could result in further
impairment to these assets.
Valuation
of Long-Lived Assets
We review the carrying value of our long-lived assets for
impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable, in
accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
(SFAS 144). SFAS 144 requires that long-lived
assets to be held and used are reported at the lower of their
carrying amount or fair value. Fair value is based on an income
approach that utilizes projections of undiscounted future cash
flows expected to be generated by our long-lived assets. In the
fourth quarter of 2008, we determined that the economic decline
in the United States and globally represented a change in
circumstance for our long-lived assets to be held and used. As
such, we reviewed our long-lived assets for impairment in
accordance with SFAS 144, and we determined that no
impairment charges were necessary. While we believe our
estimates of undiscounted future cash flows used in performing
this test are reasonable, different assumptions regarding such
cash flows and comparable sales values could materially affect
our evaluations.
41
Assets to be disposed of and assets not expected to provide any
future service potential are recorded at the lower of their
carrying amount or fair value less estimated cost to sell. For
additional information regarding impairment or disposal of
long-lived assets, see Note 19 in Part II,
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Loss
Contract Analysis
We perform an analysis to determine whether our preneed
contracts are in a loss position, which would necessitate a
charge to earnings. For this analysis, we add the sales prices
of the underlying contracts and net realized earnings, then
subtract net unrealized losses to derive the net amount of
proceeds for contracts as of the balance sheet date. We consider
unrealized gains and losses based on current market prices
quoted for the investments, and we do not include future
expected returns on the investments in our analysis. We compare
our estimated proceeds to the estimated direct costs to deliver
our contracts, which consist primarily of funeral and cemetery
merchandise costs and salaries, supplies, and equipment related
to the delivery of a preneed contract. If a deficiency were to
exist, we would record a charge to earnings and a corresponding
liability for the expected loss on delivery of those contracts
from our backlog. As of December 31, 2008, no such charge
was required. Due to the positive margins of our preneed
contracts and the trust portfolio returns we have experienced in
prior years, we believe there is currently capacity for
additional market depreciation before a loss contract would
result.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States
(GAAP) requires management to make certain estimates and
assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the carrying
values of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent
assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date. Actual results
could differ from such estimates due to uncertainties associated
with the methods and assumptions underlying our critical
accounting measurements. Key estimates used by management
include:
Allowances We provide various allowances
and/or
cancellation reserves for our funeral and cemetery preneed and
atneed receivables, as well as for our preneed funeral and
preneed cemetery deferred revenues. These allowances are based
on an analysis of historical trends and include, where
applicable, collection and cancellation activity. We also record
an estimate of general agency revenues that may be cancelled in
their first year and revenue would be charged back by the
insurance company. These estimates are impacted by a number of
factors, including changes in economy, relocation, and
demographic or competitive changes in our areas of operation.
Valuation of trust investments With the
implementation of revised FASB Interpretation No. 46,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an
Interpretation of Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51 (FIN 46R), as of
March 31, 2004, we removed the receivables due from trust
assets recorded at cost from our balance sheet and added the
actual trust investments recorded at market value. The trust
investments include marketable securities that are classified as
available-for-sale in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 115, Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.
When available, we use quoted market prices for specific
securities. When quoted market prices are not available for the
specific security, fair values are estimated by using either
quoted market prices for securities with similar characteristics
or a fair value model with observable inputs that include a
combination of interest rates, yield curves, credit risks,
prepayment terms, rating, and tax exempt status.
The valuation of private equity and other investments requires
significant management judgment due to the absence of quoted
market prices, inherent lack of liquidity, and the long-term
nature of such assets. The fair value of these investments is
estimated based on the market value of the underlying real
estate and private equity instruments. The underlying real
estate value is determined using the most recent appraisals. The
private equity investments are valued using appraisals and a
discounted cash flow methodology depending on the underlying
assets. The appraisals assess value based on a combination of
replacement cost, comparative sales analysis, and discounted
cash flow analysis. See Fair Value Measurements below for
additional information.
Legal liability reserves Contingent
liabilities, principally for legal liability matters, are
recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred
and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated in
accordance with
42
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies. Liabilities
accrued for legal matters require judgments regarding projected
outcomes and range of loss based on historical experience and
recommendations of legal counsel. However, litigation is
inherently unpredictable, and excessive verdicts do occur. As
disclosed in Note 12 in Part II, Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, our legal exposures
and the ultimate outcome of these legal proceedings could be
material to operating results or cash flows in any given quarter
or year.
Depreciation of long-lived assets We
depreciate our long-lived assets ratably over their estimated
useful lives. These estimates of useful lives may be affected by
such factors as changing market conditions or changes in
regulatory requirements.
Valuation of assets acquired and liabilities
assumed We have applied the principles of
SFAS 141 to our prior business combinations. Tangible and
intangible assets and liabilities assumed were recorded at their
fair value and goodwill recognized for any difference between
the price of acquisition and our fair value determination. We
have customarily estimated our purchase costs and other related
transactions known to us at closing of the acquisition. To the
extent that information not available to us at the closing date
subsequently became available during the allocation period, as
defined in SFAS 141, we have adjusted our goodwill, assets,
or liabilities associated with the acquisition. See Note 3
in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data, for discussion of Recent Accounting
Pronouncements which will affect how we account for business
combinations effective January 1, 2009.
Income taxes We compute income taxes using
the liability method. Our ability to realize the benefit of our
federal and state deferred tax assets requires us to achieve
certain future earnings levels. We have established a valuation
allowance against a portion of our deferred tax assets and could
be required to further adjust that valuation allowance if market
conditions change materially and future earnings are, or are
projected to be, significantly different than our current
estimates.
We intend to permanently reinvest the unremitted earnings of
certain of our foreign subsidiaries in those businesses outside
the United States. Therefore, we have not provided for deferred
federal income taxes on such unremitted foreign earnings.
We file income tax returns, including tax returns for our
subsidiaries, with U.S. federal, state, local, and foreign
jurisdictions. Our tax returns are subject to routine compliance
review by the various federal, state, and foreign taxing
authorities in the jurisdictions in which we have operated and
filed tax returns in the ordinary course of business. We accrue
tax expense to reduce our tax benefits in those situations where
it is more likely than not that we will not prevail against the
tax authorities should they challenge the tax return position
that gave rise to the benefit. We believe that our tax returns
are materially correct as filed and we will vigorously defend
any challenges and proposed adjustments to those filings made by
the tax authorities. A number of years may elapse before
particular tax matters, for which we have established accruals,
are audited and finally resolved. The number of tax years that
may be subject to a tax audit varies depending on the tax
jurisdiction. In the United States, our open tax years are 1996
to 2008. The Internal Revenue Service is currently examining our
tax returns for 1999 through 2005 and various state
jurisdictions are auditing years through 2006. While it is often
difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of
resolution of any particular tax matter, we believe that our
accruals reflect the probable outcome of known tax
contingencies. Unfavorable settlement of any particular issue
would reduce a deferred tax asset or require the payment of
cash. Favorable resolution could result in reduced income tax
expense reported in the financial statements in the future. Our
tax accruals are presented in the balance sheet within
Deferred income taxes and Other liabilities.
Pension cost Our pension plans are frozen
with no benefits accruing to participants except interest.
Pension costs and liabilities are actuarially determined based
on certain assumptions, including the discount rate used to
compute future benefit obligations. Weighted-average discount
rates used to determine net periodic pension cost were 5.75% and
5.53%, as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
We verify the reasonableness of the discount rate by comparing
our rate to the rate earned on high-quality fixed income
investments, such as the Moodys Aa index. In 2008, we
completed the termination of the Employee
43
Retirement Plan of Rose Hills, and there are no remaining assets
or liabilities under the plan. In 2007, we completed the
termination of our U.S. Pension Plan, and there are no
remaining assets or liabilities under the plan.
Insurance loss reserves We purchase
comprehensive general liability, morticians and cemetery
professional liability, automobile liability, and workers
compensation insurance coverages structured with high
deductibles. This high-deductible insurance program means we are
primarily self-insured for claims and associated costs and
losses covered by these policies. Historical insurance industry
experience indicates a high degree of inherent variability in
assessing the ultimate amount of losses associated with casualty
insurance claims. This is especially true with respect to
liability and workers compensation exposures due to the
extended period of time that transpires between when the claim
might occur and the full settlement of such claim, often many
years. We continually evaluate loss estimates associated with
claims and losses related to these insurance coverages falling
within the deductible of each coverage. Assumptions based on
factors such as claim settlement patterns, claim development
trends, claim frequency and severity patterns, inflationary
trends, and data reasonableness will generally affect the
analysis and determination of the best estimate of
the projected ultimate claim losses. The results of these
evaluations are used to both analyze and adjust our insurance
loss reserves.
As of December 31, 2008, reported losses within our
retention for workers compensation, general liability, and
auto liability incurred during the period May 1, 1987
through December 31, 2008 were approximately
$292.2 million over 21.7 years. The selected fully
developed ultimate settlement value estimated was
$341.5 million for the same period. Paid losses were
$277.9 million indicating a reserve requirement of
$63.6 million.
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the balances in our reserve
for workers compensation, general, and auto liability and
the related activity were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
67.7
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
35.9
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(33.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
69.9
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(32.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
63.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value Measurements
As discussed above, we measure the available-for-sale securities
held by our funeral and cemetery merchandise and service and
cemetery perpetual care trusts at fair value on a recurring
basis. Changes in unrealized gains
and/or
losses related to these securities are reflected in Other
comprehensive income and are offset by changes in
Deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust
and Care trusts corpus as a result of those
unrealized gains
and/or
losses; therefore, these gains
and/or
losses have no impact on our consolidated statement of
operations. Certain of these securities have been classified in
Level 3 of the SFAS 157 hierarchy due to significant
management judgment required as a result of the absence of
quoted market prices, inherent lack of liquidity, or the
long-term nature of the securities. These securities represent
5.9% of our total $2.0 billion trust fund portfolio
measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
December 31, 2008. For more information, see Notes 4,
5, and 6 in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements and Accounting Changes
For discussion of recent accounting pronouncements and
accounting changes, see Note 3 in Part II,
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
|
The market risk inherent in our financial instruments and
positions includes the price risk associated with the marketable
equity and debt securities included in our portfolio of trust
investments, the interest rate risk associated
44
with our floating rate debt, and the currency risk associated
with our foreign operations (primarily in Canada). Our
market-sensitive instruments and positions are considered to be
other-than-trading. Our exposure to market risk as
discussed below includes forward-looking statements and
represents an estimate of possible changes in fair value or
future earnings that might occur, assuming hypothetical changes
in equity markets, interest rates, and currencies. Our views on
market risk are not necessarily indicative of actual results
that may occur, and they do not represent the maximum possible
gains or losses that may occur. Actual fair value movements
related to changes in equity markets, interest rates and
currencies, along with the timing of such movements, may differ
from those estimated.
The information presented below should be read in conjunction
with Note 11 in Part II, Item 8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.
Marketable
Equity and Debt Securities Price Risk
In connection with our preneed funeral operations and preneed
cemetery merchandise and service sales, the related funeral and
cemetery trust funds own investments in equity and debt
securities and mutual funds, which are sensitive to current
market prices. Cost and market values as of December 31,
2008 are presented in Notes 4, 5, and 6 in Part II,
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Market-Rate
Sensitive Instruments Interest Rate Risk
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, approximately 87% and 89%,
respectively, of our total debt consisted of fixed rate debt at
a weighted average rate of 6.70% and 7.09%, respectively. The
fair market value of our debt was approximately
$393.9 million less than its carrying value at
December 31, 2008. A hypothetical 10% increase in interest
rates associated with our floating rate debt would increase our
interest expense by $0.8 million.
Market-Rate
Sensitive Instruments Currency Risk
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, our foreign currency
exposure was primarily associated with the Canadian dollar and
the euro. A 10% adverse change in the strength of the
U.S. dollar relative to our foreign currency instruments
would have negatively affected our income from our continuing
operations, on an annual basis, by $2.4 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008 and $0.8 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007.
At December 31, 2008, approximately 8% of our
stockholders equity and 16% of our operating income were
denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the Canadian
dollar. Approximately 14% of our stockholders equity and
8% of our operating income were denominated in foreign
currencies, primarily the Canadian dollar, at December 31,
2007. We do not have a significant investment in foreign
operations considered to be in highly inflationary economies.
45
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.
|
INDEX TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED SCHEDULE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
All other schedules have been omitted because the required
information is not applicable or is not present in amounts
sufficient to require submission or because the information
required is included in the consolidated financial statements or
the related notes thereto.
46
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Service Corporation International:
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in
the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of Service Corporation International and
its subsidiaries at December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2008 in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the
financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set
forth therein when read in conjunction with the related
consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the
Company did not maintain, in all material respects, effective
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in
Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO) because a material weakness in internal control over
financial reporting related to the accounting for income taxes
existed as of that date. A material weakness is a deficiency, or
a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over
financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility
that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial
statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
The material weakness referred to above is described in
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. We considered
this material weakness in determining the nature, timing, and
extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the
December 31, 2008 consolidated financial statements, and
our opinion regarding the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting does not affect our
opinion on those consolidated financial statements. The
Companys management is responsible for these financial
statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting included in managements report
referred to above. Our responsibility is to express opinions on
these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule,
and on the Companys internal control over financial
reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our
audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement and whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the financial statements included
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial
reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a
material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the
assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinions.
As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts
for collateral assignment split-dollar life insurance agreements
and the manner in which it accounts for the fair value of
certain assets and liabilities effective January 1, 2008,
and the manner in which it accounts for uncertain income tax
positions effective January 1, 2007.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
47
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Houston, Texas
February 28, 2009
48
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
2,155,622
|
|
|
$
|
2,285,303
|
|
|
$
|
1,752,888
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(1,736,851
|
)
|
|
|
(1,818,456
|
)
|
|
|
(1,404,924
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profits
|
|
|
418,771
|
|
|
|
466,847
|
|
|
|
347,964
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(87,447
|
)
|
|
|
(135,753
|
)
|
|
|
(92,603
|
)
|
(Losses) gains on divestitures and impairment charges, net
|
|
|
(36,124
|
)
|
|
|
16,920
|
|
|
|
(58,683
|
)
|
Hurricane expense, net
|
|
|
(3,113
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income (expense)
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
(1,848
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
292,672
|
|
|
|
346,166
|
|
|
|
196,678
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(134,274
|
)
|
|
|
(146,854
|
)
|
|
|
(123,399
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
5,393
|
|
|
|
11,725
|
|
|
|
31,171
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,986
|
)
|
|
|
(17,532
|
)
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,607
|
|
|
|
1,052
|
|
Gain on redemption of securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,133
|
|
|
|
10,932
|
|
Other expense, net
|
|
|
(629
|
)
|
|
|
(3,804
|
)
|
|
|
(1,453
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
163,162
|
|
|
|
386,987
|
|
|
|
97,449
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(65,717
|
)
|
|
|
(143,670
|
)
|
|
|
(44,845
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
97,445
|
|
|
|
243,317
|
|
|
|
52,604
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations (net of income tax
benefit (provision) of $195, $(4,818) and $2,548, respectively)
|
|
|
(362
|
)
|
|
|
4,412
|
|
|
|
3,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
97,083
|
|
|
$
|
247,729
|
|
|
$
|
56,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
.38
|
|
|
$
|
.85
|
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.02
|
|
|
|
.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
.38
|
|
|
$
|
.87
|
|
|
$
|
.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of shares
|
|
|
257,477
|
|
|
|
284,966
|
|
|
|
292,859
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
.37
|
|
|
$
|
.83
|
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.02
|
|
|
|
.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
.37
|
|
|
$
|
.85
|
|
|
$
|
.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of shares
|
|
|
260,446
|
|
|
|
290,444
|
|
|
|
297,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per share
|
|
$
|
.16
|
|
|
$
|
.13
|
|
|
$
|
.105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to consolidated financial statements)
49
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
128,397
|
|
|
$
|
168,594
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
|
96,145
|
|
|
|
113,793
|
|
Deferred tax asset
|
|
|
79,571
|
|
|
|
73,182
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
31,603
|
|
|
|
36,203
|
|
Current assets held for sale
|
|
|
1,279
|
|
|
|
2,294
|
|
Other
|
|
|
18,515
|
|
|
|
27,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
355,510
|
|
|
|
421,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
1,191,692
|
|
|
|
1,434,403
|
|
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
1,062,952
|
|
|
|
1,428,057
|
|
Cemetery property, at cost
|
|
|
1,458,981
|
|
|
|
1,451,666
|
|
Property and equipment, at cost, net
|
|
|
1,567,875
|
|
|
|
1,569,534
|
|
Non-current assets held for sale
|
|
|
97,512
|
|
|
|
122,626
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,178,969
|
|
|
|
1,198,153
|
|
Deferred charges and other assets
|
|
|
452,634
|
|
|
|
400,734
|
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments
|
|
|
744,758
|
|
|
|
905,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,110,883
|
|
|
$
|
8,932,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
294,859
|
|
|
$
|
343,392
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
27,104
|
|
|
|
36,594
|
|
Current liabilities held for sale
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
4,354
|
|
|
|
46,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
326,782
|
|
|
|
426,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,821,404
|
|
|
|
1,820,106
|
|
Deferred preneed funeral revenues
|
|
|
588,198
|
|
|
|
526,668
|
|
Deferred preneed cemetery revenues
|
|
|
771,117
|
|
|
|
753,876
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
288,677
|
|
|
|
140,623
|
|
Non-current liabilities held for sale
|
|
|
75,537
|
|
|
|
91,928
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
356,090
|
|
|
|
383,642
|
|
Deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust
|
|
|
1,817,665
|
|
|
|
2,390,288
|
|
Care trusts corpus
|
|
|
772,234
|
|
|
|
906,590
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $1 per share par value, 500,000,000 shares
authorized, 249,472,075 and 262,858,169 issued and outstanding
(net of 481,000 and 1,961,300 treasury shares at par,
respectively)
|
|
|
249,472
|
|
|
|
262,858
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
1,733,814
|
|
|
|
1,874,600
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(726,756
|
)
|
|
|
(797,965
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
36,649
|
|
|
|
152,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,293,179
|
|
|
|
1,492,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,110,883
|
|
|
$
|
8,932,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to consolidated financial statements)
50
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
97,083
|
|
|
$
|
247,729
|
|
|
$
|
56,511
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss (income) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
|
(4,412
|
)
|
|
|
(3,907
|
)
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries, net of cash
received
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,566
|
)
|
|
|
(1,052
|
)
|
Loss on early extinguishments of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,986
|
|
|
|
17,532
|
|
Premiums paid on early extinguishments of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,650
|
)
|
|
|
(15,725
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
114,157
|
|
|
|
115,682
|
|
|
|
84,010
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
23,636
|
|
|
|
27,550
|
|
|
|
13,474
|
|
Amortization of cemetery property
|
|
|
32,690
|
|
|
|
35,824
|
|
|
|
28,263
|
|
Amortization of loan costs
|
|
|
3,573
|
|
|
|
6,261
|
|
|
|
16,328
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
9,243
|
|
|
|
10,754
|
|
|
|
9,156
|
|
Provision for deferred income taxes
|
|
|
109,118
|
|
|
|
34,652
|
|
|
|
38,257
|
|
Losses (gains) on divestitures and impairment charges, net
|
|
|
36,124
|
|
|
|
(16,920
|
)
|
|
|
58,683
|
|
Gain on redemption of securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(158,133
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
9,970
|
|
|
|
8,787
|
|
|
|
7,035
|
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,469
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Change in assets and liabilities, net of effects from
acquisitions and dispositions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in receivables
|
|
|
(409
|
)
|
|
|
(24,650
|
)
|
|
|
(362
|
)
|
Decrease (increase) in other assets
|
|
|
26,100
|
|
|
|
(4,374
|
)
|
|
|
(8,488
|
)
|
(Decrease) increase in payables and other liabilities
|
|
|
(143,956
|
)
|
|
|
51,407
|
|
|
|
(10,607
|
)
|
Net effect of preneed funeral production and deliveries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in preneed funeral receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
7,271
|
|
|
|
102,080
|
|
|
|
33,064
|
|
Increase in deferred preneed funeral revenue
|
|
|
23,785
|
|
|
|
17,746
|
|
|
|
5,433
|
|
Decrease in deferred preneed funeral receipts held in trust
|
|
|
(23,334
|
)
|
|
|
(95,581
|
)
|
|
|
(29,968
|
)
|
Net effect of preneed cemetery production and maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
36,333
|
|
|
|
83,689
|
|
|
|
34,018
|
|
Increase (decrease) in deferred preneed cemetery revenue
|
|
|
11,408
|
|
|
|
5,142
|
|
|
|
(29,066
|
)
|
(Decrease) increase in deferred preneed cemetery receipts held
in trust
|
|
|
(22,388
|
)
|
|
|
(77,640
|
)
|
|
|
21,626
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(585
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(2,027
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing
operations
|
|
|
350,181
|
|
|
|
338,903
|
|
|
|
322,188
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,279
|
|
|
|
2,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
350,181
|
|
|
|
356,182
|
|
|
|
324,219
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(154,101
|
)
|
|
|
(157,011
|
)
|
|
|
(97,527
|
)
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(8,828
|
)
|
|
|
(8,355
|
)
|
|
|
(1,301,359
|
)
|
Proceeds from divestitures and sales of property and equipment
|
|
|
32,543
|
|
|
|
410,689
|
|
|
|
83,146
|
|
Proceeds from redemption of securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (deposits) withdrawals of restricted funds and other
|
|
|
(21,741
|
)
|
|
|
(17,347
|
)
|
|
|
8,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities from
continuing operations
|
|
|
(152,127
|
)
|
|
|
386,667
|
|
|
|
(1,307,101
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities from
discontinued operations
|
|
|
858
|
|
|
|
(8,546
|
)
|
|
|
9,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(151,269
|
)
|
|
|
378,121
|
|
|
|
(1,297,502
|
)
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of debt
|
|
|
(112,302
|
)
|
|
|
(29,234
|
)
|
|
|
(26,053
|
)
|
Principal payments on capital leases
|
|
|
(25,851
|
)
|
|
|
(27,057
|
)
|
|
|
(21,346
|
)
|
Proceeds from long-term debt issued
|
|
|
82,133
|
|
|
|
398,996
|
|
|
|
850,000
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,443
|
)
|
|
|
(24,716
|
)
|
Early extinguishments of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(472,545
|
)
|
|
|
(181,543
|
)
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
14,812
|
|
|
|
52,938
|
|
|
|
5,946
|
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of Company common stock
|
|
|
(142,155
|
)
|
|
|
(505,121
|
)
|
|
|
(27,870
|
)
|
Payments of dividends
|
|
|
(41,501
|
)
|
|
|
(34,629
|
)
|
|
|
(29,431
|
)
|
Bank overdrafts and other
|
|
|
(5,646
|
)
|
|
|
7,209
|
|
|
|
20,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities from
continuing operations
|
|
|
(230,510
|
)
|
|
|
(605,417
|
)
|
|
|
565,467
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,113
|
)
|
|
|
(254
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities from
continuing operations
|
|
|
(230,510
|
)
|
|
|
(607,530
|
)
|
|
|
565,213
|
|
Effect of foreign currency
|
|
|
(8,599
|
)
|
|
|
1,941
|
|
|
|
1,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(40,197
|
)
|
|
|
128,714
|
|
|
|
(406,902
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
168,594
|
|
|
|
39,880
|
|
|
|
446,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
128,397
|
|
|
$
|
168,594
|
|
|
$
|
39,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to consolidated financial statements)
51
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Capital in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Stock, Par
|
|
|
Excess of
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Par Value
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
294,809
|
|
|
|
|
343,771
|
|
|
|
(48,962
|
)
|
|
|
2,182,745
|
|
|
|
(3,593
|
)
|
|
|
(962,905
|
)
|
|
|
70,499
|
|
|
|
1,581,555
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,511
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,039
|
|
|
|
1,039
|
|
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,731
|
)
|
|
|
(3,731
|
)
|
Reclassification for translation adjustments realized in net
income, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,114
|
|
|
|
5,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,422
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,933
|
|
Adjustment for initial adoption of SFAS 158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(623
|
)
|
|
|
(623
|
)
|
Dividends on common stock ($.105 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,764
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,764
|
)
|
Common Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option exercises
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,945
|
|
Reclassification of unearned compensation for restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,593
|
)
|
|
|
3,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,942
|
)
|
|
|
51,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock award, net of forfeitures and other
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
564
|
|
Employee share-based compensation earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,035
|
|
Purchase of Company common stock
|
|
|
(3,420
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,420
|
)
|
|
|
(24,450
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,870
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
293,222
|
|
|
|
$
|
293,232
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,135,649
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(906,394
|
)
|
|
$
|
72,298
|
|
|
$
|
1,594,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,729
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,003
|
|
|
|
92,003
|
|
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,699
|
)
|
|
|
(5,699
|
)
|
Reclassification for losses on available-for-sale securities
realized in net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,430
|
|
|
|
9,430
|
|
Reclassification for translation adjustment realized in net gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,065
|
)
|
|
|
(16,065
|
)
|
Recognition of prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,292
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
328,021
|
|
Cumulative effect of FIN 48 adoption
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,853
|
|
Tax benefits related to share-based awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,513
|
|
Dividends on common stock ($.13 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,426
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,426
|
)
|
Common Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option exercises
|
|
|
7,732
|
|
|
|
|
7,732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,938
|
|
Restricted stock award, net of forfeitures and other
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
743
|
|
Employee share-based compensation earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,787
|
|
Purchase of Company common stock
|
|
|
(38,470
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,470
|
)
|
|
|
(297,498
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(169,153
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(505,121
|
)
|
Retirement of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,459
|
)
|
|
|
36,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
262,858
|
|
|
|
$
|
264,819
|
|
|
$
|
(1,961
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,874,600
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(797,965
|
)
|
|
$
|
152,590
|
|
|
$
|
1,492,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,083
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(115,941
|
)
|
|
|
(115,941
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,858
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,265
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,265
|
)
|
Dividends on common stock ($.16 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,895
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,895
|
)
|
Common Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option exercises
|
|
|
3,944
|
|
|
|
|
3,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,812
|
|
Reversal of tax benefits related to share-based awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,513
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,513
|
)
|
Restricted stock award, net of forfeitures and other
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
709
|
|
Employee share-based compensation earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,261
|
|
Purchase of Company common stock
|
|
|
(17,684
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,684
|
)
|
|
|
(101,862
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,609
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(142,155
|
)
|
Retirement of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,103
|
)
|
|
|
19,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
249,472
|
|
|
|
$
|
249,953
|
|
|
$
|
(481
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,733,814
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(726,756
|
)
|
|
$
|
36,649
|
|
|
$
|
1,293,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to consolidated financial statements)
52
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
We are a provider of deathcare products and services, with a
network of funeral service locations and cemeteries primarily
operating in the United States and Canada. Our operations
consist of funeral service locations, cemeteries, funeral
service/cemetery combination locations, crematoria, and related
businesses.
Funeral service locations provide all professional services
relating to funerals and cremations, including the use of
funeral facilities and motor vehicles and preparation and
embalming services. Funeral-related merchandise, including
caskets, burial vaults, cremation receptacles, flowers, and
other ancillary products and services, is sold at funeral
service locations. Cemeteries provide cemetery property
interment rights, including mausoleum spaces, lots, and lawn
crypts, and sell cemetery-related merchandise and services,
including stone and bronze memorials, markers, casket and
cremation memorialization products, merchandise installations,
and burial openings and closings. We also sell preneed funeral
and cemetery products and services whereby a customer
contractually agrees to the terms of certain products and
services to be provided in the future.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Principles
of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Service Corporation International (SCI) and all subsidiaries in
which we hold a controlling financial interest. Our financial
statements also include the accounts of the funeral merchandise
and service trusts, cemetery merchandise and service trusts, and
cemetery perpetual care trusts in which we have a variable
interest and are the primary beneficiary. Intercompany balances
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Business
Combinations
We have applied the principles provided in Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard SFAS No. 141
Accounting for Business Combinations
(SFAS 141) to our prior business combinations.
Tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed
were recorded at fair value and goodwill recognized for any
difference between the price of the acquisition and our fair
value determination. We have customarily estimated our purchase
costs and other related transactions known to us at closing of
the acquisition. To the extent that information not available to
us at the closing date subsequently became available during the
allocation period, as defined in SFAS 141, we have adjusted
our goodwill, assets, or liabilities associated with the
acquisition.
Reclassifications
and Out-of Period Adjustments
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior years to
conform to current period financial statement presentation with
no effect on our previously reported consolidated financial
position, results of operations, or cash flows.
In connection with our ongoing efforts to remediate our
previously reported material weaknesses and other internal
control deficiencies, we recorded several immaterial adjustments
to correct errors related to prior accounting periods during the
three months and year ended December 31, 2008. We do
not believe these adjustments are quantitatively or
qualitatively material to our consolidated financial statements
for the year ended December 31, 2008, nor were such items
quantitatively or qualitatively material to any of our prior
annual or quarterly financial statements. We do not believe
these adjustments are qualitatively material to the
three months ended December 31, 2008 although they are
quantitatively significant to such period. The net impact of
these adjustments was a decrease to our pre-tax income and net
income in the amount of $7.0 million and $4.4 million,
respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2008. The net
impact of these adjustments is a decrease to our
pre-tax
income and net income in the amount of $2.1 million and
$5.5 million, respectively, for the three months ended
December 31, 2008.
53
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Use of
Estimates in the Preparation of Financial
Statements
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that may affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements
and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. As a result, actual results could differ from
these estimates.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
We consider all highly liquid investments with an original
maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At
December 31, 2008, the majority of our cash was invested in
commercial paper. The carrying amounts of our cash and cash
equivalents approximate fair value due to the short-term nature
of these instruments.
Accounts
Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Our trade receivables primarily consist of amounts due for
funeral services already performed. We provide various
allowances
and/or
cancellation reserves for our funeral and cemetery preneed and
atneed receivables as well as for our preneed funeral and
preneed cemetery deferred revenues. These allowances are based
on an analysis of historical trends and include, where
applicable, collection and cancellation activity. Atneed funeral
and cemetery receivables are considered past due after
30 days. Collections are generally managed by the locations
until a receivable is 180 days delinquent at which time it
is fully reserved and sent to a collection agency. These
estimates are impacted by a number of factors, including changes
in the economy, relocation, and demographic or competitive
changes in our areas of operation.
Inventories
and Cemetery Property
Funeral and cemetery merchandise are stated at the lower of
average cost or market. Cemetery property is recorded at cost.
Inventory costs and cemetery property are relieved using
specific identification in performance of a contract.
Property
and Equipment, Net
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Maintenance and
repairs are charged to expense whereas renewals and major
replacements that extend the assets useful lives are
capitalized. Depreciation is recognized ratably over the
estimated useful lives of the various classes of assets.
Property is depreciated over a period ranging from seven to
forty years, equipment is depreciated over a period from three
to eight years and leasehold improvements are depreciated over
the shorter of the lease term or ten years. Depreciation expense
related to property and equipment was $114.2 million,
$115.7 million, and $84.0 million for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively. When
property is sold or retired, the cost and related accumulated
depreciation are removed from the consolidated balance sheet;
resulting gains and losses are included in the consolidated
statement of operations in the period of sale or disposal.
Leases
We have lease arrangements primarily related to funeral service
locations and transportation equipment that were primarily
classified as capital leases at December 31, 2008. Lease
terms related to funeral home properties generally range from
one to 35 years with options to renew at varying terms.
Lease terms related to transportation equipment generally range
from one to five years with options to renew at varying terms.
We calculate operating lease expense ratably over the lease
term. We consider reasonably assured renewal options and fixed
escalation provisions in our calculation. For more information
related to leases, see Note 12.
54
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Goodwill
The excess of purchase price over the fair value of identifiable
net assets acquired in business combinations is recorded as
goodwill. Goodwill is tested annually for impairment by
assessing the fair value of each of our reporting units. As of
December 31, 2008, our funeral segment reporting unit
includes assets in North America and Germany. Our cemetery
segment reporting unit includes assets in North America. We
performed our annual impairment test of goodwill in accordance
with SFAS No. 142 Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets (SFAS 142) during the
fourth quarter using information as of September 30.
Our goodwill impairment test involves estimates and management
judgment. In the first step of our goodwill impairment test, we
compare the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying
amount, including goodwill. We determine fair value of each
reporting unit using both a market and income approach. Our
methodology considers discounted cash flows and multiples of
EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and
amortization) for both SCI and its competitors. The discounted
cash flow valuation uses projections of future cash flows and
includes assumptions concerning future operating performance and
economic conditions that may differ from actual future cash
flows. We do not record an impairment of goodwill in instances
where the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying
amount. If the aggregate step one fair value is less than the
related carrying amount for a reporting unit, we compare the
implied fair value of goodwill (as defined in
SFAS 142) to the carrying amount of goodwill. If the
carrying amount of reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied
fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in
an amount equal to that excess. Based on our most recent annual
impairment test performed during the fourth quarter using
September 30 information, we concluded that there was no
impairment of goodwill as of December 31, 2008.
In addition to our annual review, we assess the impairment of
goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying value may be greater than fair value. Factors
that could trigger an interim impairment review include, but are
not limited to, significant underperformance relative to
historical or projected future operating results and significant
negative industry or economic trends. In the fourth quarter of
2008, we determined that the decline in our operating results,
combined with significant declines in the economy, resulted in a
triggering event that occurred subsequent to our annual
impairment test of goodwill. We performed an additional
impairment test based on December 31, 2008 information and
concluded that there was no impairment of goodwill. However, if
current economic conditions worsen causing further deterioration
in our operating results, we may have another triggering event,
that could result in an impairment to our goodwill. Our cemetery
segment, which has a goodwill balance of $54.8 million as
of December 31, 2008, is more sensitive to market
conditions and goodwill impairments because it is more reliant
on preneed sales which are impacted by customer discretionary
income. For more information, see Note 8.
For our most recent annual impairment test performed in the
fourth quarter using September 30 data, we used growth rates
ranging from (2.0) to 5.3% over a
three-year
period, plus a terminal value determined using the constant
growth method in projecting our future cash flows. We considered
the impact of recent realized losses in our trusts in developing
our projected cash flows. We used a 10.3% discount rate, which
reflected our weighted average cost of capital based on our
industry and our supplier industries and capital structure, as
adjusted for equity risk premiums and size risk premiums based
on our market capitalization. Fair value was calculated as the
sum of the projected discounted cash flows of our reporting
units over the next three years plus terminal value at the end
of those three years. Our terminal value was calculated using a
long-term
growth rate of 3.0%.
For this additional impairment test using December 31 data,
we used growth rates ranging from (7.5) to 6.1% over a
five-year
period plus a terminal value determined using the constant
growth method. We considered the impact of recent realized
losses in our trusts in developing our projected cash flows. We
used an 11.0% discount rate, which reflects our current weighted
average cost of capital determined based on our industry and our
supplier industries and capital structure as adjusted for equity
risk premiums and size risk premiums based on our market
capitalization. Fair value was calculated as the sum of the
projected discounted cash flows of the reporting units over the
next five years plus terminal value. Our terminal value was
calculated using a
long-term
growth rate of 3.0%.
55
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Other
Intangible Assets
Our intangible assets include cemetery customer relationships,
trademarks and tradenames, and other assets primarily resulting
from our acquisition of Alderwoods. Our trademark and tradenames
and water rights assets are considered to have an indefinite
life and are not subject to amortization. We test for impairment
of intangible assets in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142 Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142) annually
during the fourth quarter using information as of
September 30.
Our intangible assets impairment tests involve estimates and
management judgment. For trademark and tradenames, our test is
uses the relief from royalty method whereby we determine the
fair value of the assets by discounted the cash flows that
represent a savings over having to pay a royalty fee for use of
the trademark and tradenames. The discounted cash flow valuation
uses projections of future cash flows and includes assumptions
concerning future operating performance and economic conditions
that may differ from actual future cash flows. For our most
recent annual impairment test performed in the fourth quarter
using September 30 data, we estimated that the pre-tax savings
would be 4% of the revenues associated with the trademark and
tradenames, based primarily on our research of intellectual
property valuation and licensing databases. We also assumed a
terminal growth rate of 3.0% and discounted the cash flows at
10.5% based on the relative risk of these assets to our overall
business. Based on our annual impairment test performed during
the fourth quarter using September 30 information, we concluded
that there was no impairment of intangible assets as of
December 31, 2008.
In addition to our annual review, we assess the impairment of
intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value may be greater than the fair
value. Factors that could trigger an interim impairment review
include, but are not limited to, significant underperformance
relative to historical or projected future operating results and
significant negative industry or economic trends. In the fourth
quarter of 2008, we determined that the decline in our operating
results, combined with significant declines in the economy,
resulted in a triggering event that occurred subsequent to our
annual impairment test of intangible assets. We performed an
additional impairment test based on December 31, 2008
information and concluded that there was an impairment of our
trademark and tradenames asset of $3.8 million. For this
additional impairment test, we estimated that the pre-tax
savings would be 4% of the revenues associated with the
trademark and tradenames, based primarily on our research of
intellectual property valuation and licensing databases. We also
assumed a terminal growth rate of 3.0% and discounted the cash
flows at 11.2% based on the relative risk of these assets to our
overall business. If the current economic conditions worsen,
causing further deterioration in our operating results, we may
have another triggering event that could result in further
impairment to these assets.
Our preneed deferred revenue intangible asset is relieved using
specific identification in performance of a contract. We
amortize all other intangible assets on a straight-line basis
over their estimated useful lives of
10-20 years.
Amortization expense for preneed deferred revenue and other
intangible assets was $23.6 million, $27.6 million,
and $13.5 million for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.
Valuation
of Long-Lived Assets
We review the carrying value of our long-lived assets for
impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable, in
accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
(SFAS 144). SFAS 144 requires that long-lived
assets to be held and used are reported at the lower of their
carrying amount or fair value. Fair value is based on an income
approach that utilizes projections of undiscounted future cash
flows expected to be generated by our
long-lived
assets. In the fourth quarter of 2008, we determined that the
economic decline represented a change in circumstance for our
long-lived assets to be held and used. As such, we reviewed our
long-lived assets for impairment in accordance with
SFAS 144, and we determined that no impairment charges were
necessary. While we believe our estimates of undiscounted future
cash flows used in performing this test are reasonable,
different assumptions regarding such cash flows and comparable
sales values could materially affect our evaluations.
56
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Assets to be disposed of and assets not expected to provide any
future service potential are recorded at the lower of their
carrying amount or fair value less estimated cost to sell. We
determined the fair value of assets to be disposed of using a
market approach. See Note 19 for additional information
related to assets to be disposed.
Treasury
Stock
We make treasury stock purchases in the open market or through
privately negotiated transactions subject to market conditions
and normal trading restrictions. We account for the repurchase
of our common stock under the par value method. We use the
average cost method upon the subsequent reissuance of treasury
shares. On December 15, 2008, we cancelled
19.1 million shares of common stock held in our treasury.
We cancelled 36.5 million and 51.9 million shares of
common stock held in our treasury in 2007 and 2006,
respectively. These retired treasury shares were changed to
authorized but unissued status.
Foreign
Currency Translation
All assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries are
translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect as
of the end of the reporting period. Revenue and expense items
are translated at the average exchange rates for the reporting
period. The resulting translation adjustments are included in
Stockholders equity as a component of
Accumulated other comprehensive income in the
consolidated statement of stockholders equity and balance
sheet.
The functional currency of SCI and its subsidiaries is the
respective local currency. The transactional currency gains and
losses that arise from transactions denominated in currencies
other than the functional currencies of our operations are
recorded in Other income, net in the consolidated
statement of operations. We do not operate in countries which
are considered to have hyperinflationary economies.
Fair
Value Measurements
We measure the available-for-sale securities held by our
funeral, cemetery merchandise and service, and cemetery
perpetual care trusts at fair value on a recurring basis.
Changes in unrealized gains
and/or
losses related to these securities are reflected in Other
comprehensive income and offset by the Deferred preneed
funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust and Care
trusts corpus interest in those unrealized gains
and/or
losses. Certain of these securities have been classified in
Level 3 of the SFAS No. 157 Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS 157) hierarchy due to
significant management judgment required as a result of the
absence of quoted market prices, inherent lack of liquidity, or
the long-term nature of the securities. These securities
represent 5.9% of our total $2.0 billion trust fund
portfolio measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
December 31, 2008. For more information see Notes 4,
5, and 6.
Funeral
Operations
Revenue is recognized when funeral services are performed and
funeral merchandise is delivered. Our funeral trade receivables
consist of amounts due for services already performed and
merchandise delivered. An allowance for doubtful accounts is
provided based on historical experience. We sell
price-guaranteed preneed funeral contracts through various
programs providing for future funeral services at prices
prevailing when the agreements are signed. Revenues associated
with sales of preneed funeral contracts are deferred until such
time that the funeral services are performed. Allowances for
customer cancellations are based upon historical experience.
Sales taxes collected are recognized on a net basis in our
consolidated financial statements.
Pursuant to state or provincial law, all or a portion of the
proceeds from funeral merchandise or services sold on a preneed
basis may be required to be paid into trust funds. We defer
investment earnings related to these merchandise and service
trusts until the associated merchandise is delivered or services
are performed. Costs related to sales of merchandise and
services are charged to expense when merchandise is delivered
and services performed. See Note 4 for more information
regarding preneed funeral activities.
57
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Cemetery
Operations
Revenue associated with sales of cemetery merchandise and
services is recognized when the service is performed or
merchandise is delivered. Our cemetery trade receivables consist
of amounts due for services already performed and merchandise
already delivered. An allowance for doubtful accounts has been
provided based on historical experience. Revenue associated with
sales of preneed cemetery interment rights is recognized in
accordance with the retail land sales provisions of
SFAS No. 66, Accounting for the Sales of Real
Estate (SFAS 66). Under SFAS 66, revenue
from constructed cemetery property is not recognized until 10%
of the sales price has been collected. Revenue related to the
preneed sale of unconstructed cemetery property is deferred
until it is constructed and 10% of the sales price is collected.
Revenue associated with sales of preneed merchandise and
services is not recognized until the merchandise is delivered or
the services are performed. Allowances for customer
cancellations for preneed cemetery contracts are based upon
historical experience. For services and non-personalized
merchandise (such as vaults), we defer the revenues until the
services are performed and the merchandise is delivered. Sales
taxes collected are recognized on a net basis in our
consolidated financial statements. For personalized marker
merchandise, with the customers direction generally
obtained at the time of sale, we can choose to order, store, and
transfer title to the customer. In situations in which we have
no further obligation or involvement related to the merchandise,
we recognize revenues and record the cost of sales in accordance
with SAB No. 104 Revenue Recognition
(SAB 104) upon the earlier of vendor storage of these
items or delivery in our cemetery.
Pursuant to state or provincial law, all or a portion of the
proceeds from cemetery merchandise or services sold on a preneed
basis may be required to be paid into trust funds. We defer
investment earnings related to these merchandise and services
trusts until the associated merchandise is delivered or services
are performed.
A portion of the proceeds from the sale of cemetery property
interment rights is required by state or provincial law to be
paid into perpetual care trust funds. Investment earnings from
these trusts are distributed to us regularly, are recognized in
current cemetery revenues, and are intended to defray cemetery
maintenance costs, which are expensed as incurred. The principal
of such perpetual care trust funds generally cannot be withdrawn.
Costs related to the sale of property interment rights include
the property and construction costs specifically identified by
project. At the completion of the project, construction costs
are charged to expense in the same period revenue is recognized.
Costs related to sales of merchandise and services are charged
to expense when merchandise is delivered and when services are
performed. See Notes 5 and 6 for more information regarding
preneed cemetery activities.
Income
Taxes
Income taxes are computed using the liability method. Deferred
taxes are provided on all temporary differences between the
financial bases and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. We
record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets
when uncertainty regarding their realization exists. We intend
to permanently reinvest the unremitted earnings of certain of
our foreign subsidiaries in those businesses outside the United
States, and therefore we have not provided for deferred federal
income taxes on such unremitted foreign earnings. For more
information related to income taxes, see Note 9.
|
|
3.
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements and Accounting Changes
|
Transfers
of Financial Assets
In December 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 140-4
and FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 46(R)-8,
Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about
Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest
Entities
(FSP 140-4).
FSP 140-4
requires public entities to provide additional disclosures about
transfers of financial assets. It also amends FASB
interpretation No. 46(R) to require public enterprises,
including sponsors that
58
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
have a variable interest in a variable interest entity, to
provide additional disclosures about their involvement with
variable interest entities. The provisions of this FSP are
effective for reporting periods ending after December 15,
2008. The adoption of this FSP will have no impact on our
consolidated financial statements; however, it does require us,
effective with this filing, to add additional disclosures
related to our involvement with variable interest entities,
which consist of our preneed funeral and cemetery trust
investments and our cemetery perpetual care trust investments.
See Notes 4, 5, and 6 for additional information.
Disclosures
about Credit Derivatives
In September 2008, the FASB issued FSP
SFAS No. 133-1
and
FIN No. 45-4,
Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain
Guarantees: An Amendment of SFAS No. 133 and
FIN No. 45; and Clarification of Effective Date of
SFAS No. 161
(FSP 133-1).
FSP 133-1
requires disclosures by sellers of credit derivatives, including
credit derivatives embedded in hybrid instruments, and
additional disclosure about the current status of the
payment/performance risk of a guarantee. The provisions of this
FSP that amend SFAS No. 133 and FIN No. 45
are effective for reporting periods ending after
November 15, 2008. Our adoption of this FSP did not impact
our consolidated financial statements.
Sales
of Real Estate
In July 2008, the FASB ratified the consensus reached by the
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) on Issue
No. 07-06
Accounting for Sale of Real Estate Subject to the
Requirements of SFAS No. 66
(EITF 07-06).
EITF 07-06
provides clarification whether a buy-sell clause is a prohibited
form of continuing involvement that would preclude partial sales
treatment under SFAS No. 66, Accounting for
Sales of Real Estate. We adopted the provisions of
EITF 07-06
for new arrangements entered into and assessments performed on
or after January 1, 2008. The adoption of this statement
did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements. The future impact of adopting
EITF 07-06
will be dependent on sales of real estate, if any, that we may
pursue.
Determination
of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP
SFAS No. 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets
(FSP 142-3).
FSP 142-3
amends the factors that should be considered in developing
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful
life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and
requires enhanced related disclosures.
FSP 142-3
must be applied prospectively to all intangible assets
recognized as of or acquired subsequent to January 1, 2009.
We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting
FSP 142-3
on our consolidated financial statements.
Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities An Amendment of FASB Statement
No. 133 (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 amends and
expands the disclosures required by SFAS 133 to provide an
enhanced understanding of the reasons an entity engages in
derivative instruments and hedging activities. It also requires
disclosures about how such items are accounted for under
SFAS 133 and how they impact the entitys financial
statements. The provisions of SFAS 161 are effective
beginning January 1, 2009. The adoption of this statement
is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
Business
Combinations
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141
(revised 2007), Business Combinations
(SFAS 141(R)), which requires the acquiring entity to
recognize assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any
non-controlling interest in the acquired at the acquisition
date, measured at the fair values as of that date, eliminating
the allocation period allowed under SFAS 141.
Among other changes, SFAS 141(R) includes the requirement
that acquisition-related
59
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(transition) costs be recognized separately from the acquisition
and expensed as incurred, instead of accounted for as a cost of
the acquired business. This statement is effective for us for
business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or
after January 1, 2009 and for certain income tax effects
related to prior business combinations beginning January 1,
2009. The impact of adopting SFAS 141(R) will be dependent
on future business combinations, if any, that we may pursue
after its effective date.
Non-controlling
Interests
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51
(SFAS 160), which establishes accounting and reporting
standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and
for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 clarifies
that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary, which is
sometimes referred to as unconsolidated investment, is an
ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be
reported as a component of equity in the consolidated financial
statements. Among other requirements, SFAS 160 requires
consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include
the amounts attributable to both the parent and the
non-controlling interest. It also requires disclosure, on the
face of the consolidated income statement, of the amounts of
consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the
noncontrolling interest. The provisions of SFAS 160 are
effective for us on January 1, 2009. The adoption of this
statement is not expected to have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
During our examination of SFAS 160 and its impact on our
current accounting, we determined that balances historically
designated as non-controlling interest in our
consolidated preneed funeral and cemetery trusts and our
cemetery perpetual care trusts do not meet the criteria for
non-controlling interest as prescribed by SFAS 160.
SFAS 160 indicates that only a financial instrument
classified as equity in the trusts financial statements
can be a non-controlling interest in the consolidated financial
statements. The interest related to our merchandise and service
trusts is classified as a liability because the preneed
contracts underlying these trusts are unconditionally redeemable
upon the occurrence of an event that is certain to occur. Since
the earnings from our cemetery perpetual care trusts are used to
support the maintenance of our cemeteries, we believe the
interest in these trusts also retains the characteristics of a
liability. Accordingly, effective December 31, 2008, the
amounts historically described as Non-controlling
interest in funeral and cemetery trusts are
characterized as either Deferred preneed funeral
revenues held in trust or Deferred preneed
cemetery revenues held in trust, as appropriate. The
amounts historically described as Non-controlling
interest in cemetery perpetual care trusts are
characterized as Care Trusts Corpus.
Split-Dollar
Life Insurance Agreements
In March 2007, the FASB ratified EITF Issue
No. 06-10
Accounting for Collateral Assignment Split-Dollar Life
Insurance Agreements
(EITF 06-10).
EITF 06-10
provides guidance for determining a liability for the
postretirement benefit obligation as well as recognition and
measurement of the associated asset on the basis of the terms of
a collateral assignment agreement. We adopted the provisions of
EITF 06-10
effective January 1, 2008. As a result of our adoption, we
recorded a $3.3 million cumulative-effect adjustment which
increased our Accumulated deficit as of January 1,
2008.
Fair
Value Option
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities (SFAS 159). SFAS 159
permits entities to choose to measure various financial assets
and financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and
losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected
are reported in earnings. The fair value option may be elected
on an
instrument-by-instrument
basis, as long as it is applied to the instrument in its
entirety. The election is irrevocable, unless an event specified
in SFAS 159 occurs that results in a new election date. We
adopted the provisions of SFAS 159 effective
January 1, 2008. The adoption
60
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
of SFAS 159 had no impact on our consolidated financial
statements as we elected not to measure any additional financial
instruments at fair value as of the date of adoption.
Defined
Benefit Pensions
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension
and Other Postretirement Plans an amendment of FASB
Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)
(SFAS 158), which requires recognition of the funded
status of a benefit plan in the balance sheet. SFAS 158
also requires recognition, in Other comprehensive income,
of certain gains and losses that arise during the period but
which were deferred under previous pension accounting rules.
SFAS 158 also modified the requirements for the timing of
reports and disclosures. SFAS 158 provides recognition and
disclosure elements that were effective for us during the year
ended December 31, 2006 and measurement date elements are
effective for us during the year ended December 31, 2008.
We terminated our cash balance plan in 2007. We adopted the
recognition and disclosure element of SFAS 158 effective
December 31, 2006 and as a result we reclassified
$0.6 million of unamortized prior service costs from
Other long-term liabilities to Accumulated other
comprehensive income.
Fair
Value Measurements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157).
SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be
received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value, and expands disclosures about instruments measured at
fair value. SFAS 157 establishes a three-level valuation
hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The
valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to
the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement
date. The three levels are defined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are
quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities
in active markets;
|
|
|
|
Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology
include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in
active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or
liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the
full term of the financial instrument;
|
|
|
|
Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are
unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
|
An assets or liabilitys categorization within the
valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that
is significant to the fair value measurement.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP)
FAS 157-1.
Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB
Statement 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements that Address
Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or
Measurement under Statement 13
(FSP 157-1)
and FSP
No. FAS 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157
(FSP 157-2).
FSP 157-1
amends SFAS 157 to exclude SFAS No. 13,
Accounting for Leases and its related accounting
pronouncements that address leasing transactions.
FSP 157-2
provides a one-year deferral of the effective date of
SFAS 157 for non-financial assets and liabilities, except
those that are recognized or disclosed in the financial
statements at fair value at least annually. In accordance with
FSP 157-2,
we adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 for our financial
assets and liabilities that are measured on a recurring basis at
fair value, effective January 1, 2008. These financial
assets include the investments of our funeral, cemetery, and
cemetery perpetual care trusts. For additional disclosures
required by SFAS 157 for these assets, see Notes 4, 5,
and 6.
As allowed by
FSP 157-2,
the provisions of SFAS 157 have not been applied to our
non-financial assets and liabilities. The major categories of
assets and liabilities that are subject to non-recurring fair
value measurement, for which we have not yet applied the
provisions of SFAS 157, are as follows: reporting units
measured at fair value in
61
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the first step of a goodwill impairment test under
SFAS 142; indefinite-lived intangible assets measured at
fair value for impairment assessment under SFAS 142;
non-financial assets measured at fair value for an impairment
assessment under SFAS 144; and non-financial assets and
liabilities initially measured at fair value in a business
combination under SFAS 141.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP
No. SFAS 157-3,
Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When
the Market for That Asset Is Not Active (FSP
SFAS 157-3),
which clarifies the application of SFAS 157 in a market
that is not active and provides an example to illustrate key
considerations in determining the fair value of a financial
asset when the market for that financial asset is not active.
FSP
SFAS 157-3
is effective immediately, including prior periods for which
financial statements have not been issued. We adopted FSP
SFAS 157-3
effective with our financial statements for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008. The adoption of FSP
SFAS 157-3
had no impact on our consolidated results of operations,
financial position, or cash flows.
Uncertainty
in Income Taxes
In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN 48), which clarifies the accounting for uncertain
income tax positions recognized in an enterprises
financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes. This
interpretation requires companies to use a prescribed model for
assessing the financial statement recognition and measurement of
all tax positions taken or expected to be taken in its tax
returns. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure, and transition. We adopted the provisions
of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. See Note 9 for more
information.
|
|
4.
|
Preneed
Funeral Activities
|
Preneed
Funeral Receivables and Trust Investments
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments, net of
allowance for cancellation, represent trust investments,
including investment earnings, and customer receivables related
to unperformed, price-guaranteed preneed funeral contracts. Our
funeral merchandise and service trusts are defined as variable
interest entities pursuant to FIN46(R); also, per FIN46(R), we
have determined that we are the primary beneficiary of these
trusts, as we absorb both a majority of the losses and returns
associated with our trusts. Our cemetery trust investments
detailed in Notes 5 and 6 are accounted for in the same
manner, in accordance with FIN46(R). When we receive payments
from the customer, we deposit the amount required by law into
the trust and reclassify the corresponding amount from
Deferred preneed funeral revenues into Deferred
preneed funeral receipts held in trust. Amounts are
withdrawn from the trusts after the contract obligations are
performed. Cash flows from preneed funeral contracts are
presented as operating cash flows in our consolidated statement
of cash flows.
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments are
reduced by the trust investment earnings (realized and
unrealized) that we have been allowed to withdraw in certain
states prior to maturity. These earnings are recorded in
Deferred preneed funeral revenues until the service is
performed or the merchandise is delivered.
62
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The table below sets forth the investment-related activities
associated with our preneed funeral merchandise and service
trusts for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
93,586
|
|
|
$
|
84,712
|
|
|
$
|
77,691
|
|
Withdrawals
|
|
$
|
122,294
|
|
|
$
|
176,528
|
|
|
$
|
109,758
|
|
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
|
|
$
|
383,975
|
|
|
$
|
1,093,255
|
|
|
$
|
646,667
|
|
Sales of available-for-sale securities
|
|
$
|
382,940
|
|
|
$
|
901,609
|
|
|
$
|
862,507
|
|
Realized gains from sales of available-for-sale securities
|
|
$
|
46,703
|
|
|
$
|
106,394
|
|
|
$
|
83,350
|
|
Realized losses from sales of available-for-sale securities
|
|
$
|
(76,192
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29,940
|
)
|
|
$
|
(36,653
|
)
|
The components of Preneed funeral receivables and trust
investments in our consolidated balance sheet at December 31
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Trust investments, at market
|
|
$
|
636,712
|
|
|
$
|
848,195
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
125,657
|
|
|
|
194,728
|
|
Insurance-backed fixed income securities
|
|
|
216,394
|
|
|
|
201,258
|
|
Receivables from customers
|
|
|
249,224
|
|
|
|
225,905
|
|
Unearned finance charge
|
|
|
(6,316
|
)
|
|
|
(5,961
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,221,671
|
|
|
|
1,464,125
|
|
Allowance for cancellation
|
|
|
(29,979
|
)
|
|
|
(29,722
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments
|
|
$
|
1,191,692
|
|
|
$
|
1,434,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An allowance for contract cancellation is estimated based on our
historical experience. If a preneed funeral contract is
cancelled prior to delivery, state or provincial law determines
the amount of the refund owed to the customer, if any, including
the amount of the attributed investment earnings. Upon
cancellation, we receive the amount of principal deposited to
trust and previously undistributed net investment earnings and,
where required, issue a refund to the customer. We retain excess
funds, if any, and recognize the attributed investment earnings
(net of any investment earnings payable to the customer) as
revenue in our consolidated statement of operations. In certain
jurisdictions, we may be obligated to fund any shortfall if the
amounts deposited by the customer exceed the funds in trust.
Funds in trust assets exceeded customer deposits at the year
ended December 31, 2008.
63
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The activity in Preneed funeral receivables and trust
investments for the years ended December 31 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Beginning balance Preneed funeral receivables and
trust investments
|
|
$
|
1,434,403
|
|
|
$
|
1,516,676
|
|
|
$
|
1,226,192
|
|
Net preneed contract sales
|
|
|
155,988
|
|
|
|
146,250
|
|
|
|
121,287
|
|
Cash receipts from customers
|
|
|
(119,981
|
)
|
|
|
(119,458
|
)
|
|
|
(110,438
|
)
|
Deposits to trust
|
|
|
93,586
|
|
|
|
84,712
|
|
|
|
77,691
|
|
Acquisitions (dispositions) of businesses, net
|
|
|
23,838
|
|
|
|
(73,502
|
)
|
|
|
256,138
|
|
Net undistributed investment (losses) earnings(1)
|
|
|
(217,767
|
)
|
|
|
54,397
|
|
|
|
82,007
|
|
Maturities and distributed earnings
|
|
|
(144,257
|
)
|
|
|
(184,579
|
)
|
|
|
(130,852
|
)
|
Change in cancellation allowance
|
|
|
(603
|
)
|
|
|
8,816
|
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency and other
|
|
|
(33,515
|
)
|
|
|
1,091
|
|
|
|
(4,817
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance Preneed funeral receivables and trust
investments
|
|
$
|
1,191,692
|
|
|
$
|
1,434,403
|
|
|
$
|
1,516,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes both realized and unrealized investment (losses)
earnings. |
64
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The cost and market values associated with our funeral trust
investments recorded at fair market value at December 31,
2008 and 2007 are detailed below. Cost reflects the investment
(net of redemptions) of control holders in common trust funds,
mutual funds, and private equity investments. Fair market value
represents the value of the underlying securities held by the
common trust funds, mutual funds at published values, and the
estimated market value of private equity investments. The fair
market value of funeral trust investments was 76% and 101% of
the related cost basis of such investments as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
61,907
|
|
|
|
569
|
|
|
|
(17,533
|
)
|
|
|
44,943
|
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
86,216
|
|
|
|
951
|
|
|
|
(828
|
)
|
|
|
86,339
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
21,144
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
(670
|
)
|
|
|
20,580
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
26,230
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
(7,728
|
)
|
|
|
18,735
|
|
Asset-backed
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
343,144
|
|
|
|
3,244
|
|
|
|
(102,782
|
)
|
|
|
243,606
|
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
98,499
|
|
|
|
691
|
|
|
|
(33,276
|
)
|
|
|
65,914
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
156,393
|
|
|
|
2,475
|
|
|
|
(40,380
|
)
|
|
|
118,488
|
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
47,858
|
|
|
|
2,697
|
|
|
|
(9,675
|
)
|
|
|
40,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust investments
|
|
$
|
841,411
|
|
|
$
|
10,966
|
|
|
$
|
(212,872
|
)
|
|
$
|
639,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Assets associated with businesses held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,793
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
636,712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
79,430
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
(378
|
)
|
|
|
79,682
|
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
60,330
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
(440
|
)
|
|
|
60,234
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
14,937
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
|
|
14,910
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
2,670
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
2,706
|
|
Asset-backed
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
1,581
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
1,594
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
378,628
|
|
|
|
12,415
|
|
|
|
(6,131
|
)
|
|
|
384,912
|
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
127,606
|
|
|
|
3,991
|
|
|
|
(2,246
|
)
|
|
|
129,351
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
140,857
|
|
|
|
3,005
|
|
|
|
(1,612
|
)
|
|
|
142,250
|
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
43,820
|
|
|
|
2,815
|
|
|
|
(5,297
|
)
|
|
|
41,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust investments
|
|
$
|
849,892
|
|
|
$
|
23,495
|
|
|
$
|
(16,377
|
)
|
|
$
|
857,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Assets associated with businesses held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,815
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
848,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where quoted prices are available in an active market,
securities held by the common trust funds and mutual funds are
classified as Level 1 investments pursuant to the
three-level valuation hierarchy provided in SFAS 157. Our
investments classified as Level 1 securities include common
stock and mutual funds.
Where quoted market prices are not available for the specific
security, fair values are estimated by using either quoted
prices of securities with similar characteristics or a fair
value model with observable inputs that include a combination of
interest rates, yield curves, credit risks, prepayment speeds,
rating, and tax-exempt status. These securities included United
States (U.S.) Treasury, foreign government, corporate,
mortgage-backed and asset-backed fixed income securities, and
preferred stock equity securities, all of which are classified
within Level 2 of the SFAS 157 valuation hierarchy.
The valuation of private equity and other investments requires
significant management judgment due to the absence of quoted
market prices, inherent lack of liquidity, or the long-term
nature of such assets. The fair value of these investments is
estimated based on the market value of the underlying real
estate and private equity investments. The underlying real
estate value is determined using the most recent available
appraisals. Private equity investments are valued using market
appraisals or a discounted cash flow methodology depending on
the nature of the underlying assets. The appraisals assess value
based on a combination of replacement cost, comparative sales
analysis, and discounted cash flow analysis. As a result of the
adoption of SFAS 157 in the first quarter of 2008, we
recorded a $3.5 million decrease in the fair value of our
private equity investments held by the funeral trusts to reflect
time-based restrictions on the exit from the investments. As a
result of the adoption, we recorded the decrease and a
corresponding increase in Other comprehensive income in
our consolidated balance sheet. Our private equity and other
investments are included within Level 3 of the
SFAS 157 valuation hierarchy. We further reviewed our
private equity and other investments in accordance with the
guidance included in FSP
SFAS 157-3
(see Note 3) and determined that no additional adjustments
to fair value were required.
66
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The inputs into the fair value of our market-based funeral trust
investments are categorized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Quoted Market
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in Active
|
|
Other
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
Markets
|
|
Observable
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
Inputs (Level 2)
|
|
Inputs (Level 3)
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Trust investments
|
|
$
|
428,008
|
|
|
$
|
170,617
|
|
|
$
|
40,880
|
|
|
$
|
639,505
|
|
The change in our market-based funeral trust investments with
significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fair market value, January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
37,865
|
|
Total unrealized losses included in Other comprehensive
income(1)
|
|
|
(5,920
|
)
|
Total realized gains included in Other expense, net(2)
|
|
|
420
|
|
Purchases, sales, contributions, and distributions, net
|
|
|
8,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair market value, December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
40,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All gains (losses) recognized in Other comprehensive income
for our funeral trust investments are attributable to our
preneed customers and are offset by a corresponding increase
(decrease) in Deferred preneed funeral receipts held in
trust. See Note 7 for further information related to
our Deferred preneed funeral receipts held in trust. |
|
(2) |
|
All gains (losses) recognized in Other expense, net for
our funeral trust investments are attributable to our preneed
customers and are offset by a corresponding reclassification in
Other expense, net to Deferred preneed funeral
receipts held in trust. See Note 7 for further
information related to our Deferred preneed funeral receipts
held in trust. |
Maturity dates of our fixed income securities range from 2009 to
2038. Maturities of fixed income securities at December 31,
2008 are estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
63,945
|
|
Due in one to five years
|
|
|
42,423
|
|
Due in five to ten years
|
|
|
37,156
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
27,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
170,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We assess our trust investments for other-than-temporary
declines in fair value on a quarterly basis. Impairment charges,
if any, as a result of this assessment, which reduce the
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments, are
recognized as investment losses in Other expense, net in
our consolidated statement of operations and are offset by the
corresponding reclassifications in Other expense, net,
which reduces Deferred preneed funeral receipts held in
trust. See Note 7 for further information related to
our Deferred preneed funeral receipts held in trust.
During 2008 we recorded a $9.1 million impairment charge
for other-than-temporary declines in fair value related to
unrealized losses on certain equity securities. In the second
quarter of 2007, we recorded a $3.6 million impairment
charge for other-than-temporary declines in fair value related
to unrealized losses on certain private equity and other
investments.
We have determined that the remaining unrealized losses in our
funeral trust investments at both December 31, 2008 and
2007 are considered temporary in nature, as the unrealized
losses were due to temporary fluctuations in
67
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
interest rates and equity prices. The investments are
diversified across multiple industry segments using a balanced
allocation strategy to minimize long-term risk. The unrealized
losses reflect the effects of the current economic crisis. We
believe that none of the securities are other-than-temporarily
impaired based on our analysis of the investments. Our analysis
included a review of the portfolio holdings and discussions with
the individual money managers as to the sector exposures, credit
ratings and the severity and duration of the unrealized losses.
Our funeral trust investment unrealized losses, their associated
fair market values and the duration of unrealized losses as of
December 31, 2008, are shown in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
Greater Than 12 Months
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
$
|
18,750
|
|
|
$
|
(7,944
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,513
|
|
|
$
|
(9,589
|
)
|
|
$
|
34,263
|
|
|
$
|
(17,533
|
)
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
19,711
|
|
|
|
(828
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,711
|
|
|
|
(828
|
)
|
Corporate
|
|
|
9,751
|
|
|
|
(453
|
)
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
(217
|
)
|
|
|
10,162
|
|
|
|
(670
|
)
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
8,118
|
|
|
|
(3,495
|
)
|
|
|
6,925
|
|
|
|
(4,233
|
)
|
|
|
15,043
|
|
|
|
(7,728
|
)
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
124,474
|
|
|
|
(52,652
|
)
|
|
|
91,003
|
|
|
|
(50,130
|
)
|
|
|
215,477
|
|
|
|
(102,782
|
)
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
33,709
|
|
|
|
(15,589
|
)
|
|
|
27,181
|
|
|
|
(17,687
|
)
|
|
|
60,890
|
|
|
|
(33,276
|
)
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
43,432
|
|
|
|
(19,348
|
)
|
|
|
33,975
|
|
|
|
(21,032
|
)
|
|
|
77,407
|
|
|
|
(40,380
|
)
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
2,317
|
|
|
|
(995
|
)
|
|
|
18,509
|
|
|
|
(8,680
|
)
|
|
|
20,826
|
|
|
|
(9,675
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities
|
|
$
|
260,262
|
|
|
$
|
(101,304
|
)
|
|
$
|
193,517
|
|
|
$
|
(111,568
|
)
|
|
$
|
453,779
|
|
|
$
|
(212,872
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from all trust investments are recognized in current
funeral revenues when the service is performed or merchandise is
delivered. In addition, we are entitled to retain, in certain
jurisdictions, a portion of collected customer payments when a
customer cancels a preneed contract; these amounts are also
recognized in current revenues. Recognized earnings (realized
and unrealized) related to these trust investments were
$37.5 million, $45.8 million, and $35.1 million
for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006,
respectively.
Deferred
Preneed Funeral Revenues
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, Deferred preneed funeral
revenues, net of allowance for cancellation, represent
future funeral service revenues, including distributed trust
investment earnings associated with unperformed trust-funded
preneed funeral contracts that are not held in trust accounts.
Deferred preneed funeral revenues are recognized in
current funeral revenues when the service is performed or
merchandise is delivered. Future funeral service revenues and
net trust investment earnings that are held in trust accounts
are included in Deferred preneed funeral receipts held in
trust.
68
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes the activity in Deferred
preneed funeral revenues for the years ended December 31
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Beginning balance Deferred preneed funeral revenues,
net
|
|
$
|
526,668
|
|
|
$
|
537,792
|
|
|
$
|
535,384
|
|
Net preneed contract sales
|
|
|
149,150
|
|
|
|
135,417
|
|
|
|
107,291
|
|
Acquisitions (dispositions) of businesses, net
|
|
|
41,469
|
|
|
|
(120,290
|
)
|
|
|
25,758
|
|
Net investment (losses) earnings(1)
|
|
|
(191,601
|
)
|
|
|
56,779
|
|
|
|
76,127
|
|
Recognized deferred preneed revenues
|
|
|
(162,409
|
)
|
|
|
(173,126
|
)
|
|
|
(136,376
|
)
|
Change in cancellation allowance
|
|
|
(2,336
|
)
|
|
|
6,499
|
|
|
|
(7,815
|
)
|
Change in deferred preneed funeral receipts held in trust
|
|
|
222,565
|
|
|
|
76,370
|
|
|
|
(52,512
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency and other
|
|
|
4,692
|
|
|
|
7,227
|
|
|
|
(10,065
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance Deferred preneed funeral revenues, net
|
|
$
|
588,198
|
|
|
$
|
526,668
|
|
|
$
|
537,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes both realized and unrealized investment (losses)
earnings. |
Insurance-Funded
Preneed Funeral Contracts
Not included in our consolidated balance sheet are
insurance-funded preneed funeral contracts that will be funded
by life insurance or annuity contracts issued by third party
insurers. The proceeds of the life insurance policies or annuity
contracts will be reflected in funeral revenues as these
funerals are performed by the Company.
|
|
5.
|
Preneed
Cemetery Activities
|
Preneed
Cemetery Receivables and Trust Investments
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments, net
of allowance for cancellation, represent trust investments,
including investment earnings, and customer receivables, net of
unearned finance charges, for contracts sold in advance of when
the property interment rights, merchandise, or services are
needed. Our cemetery merchandise and service trusts are defined
as variable interest entities pursuant to FIN46(R); also, per
FIN46(R), we have determined that we are the primary beneficiary
of these trusts, as we absorb both a majority of the losses and
returns associated with our trusts. The trust investments
detailed in Notes 4 and 6 are accounted for in the same
manner, in accordance with FIN46(R). When we receive payments
from the customer, we deposit the amount required by law into
the trust, remove the corresponding amount from Deferred
preneed cemetery revenues, and record the amount into
Deferred preneed cemetery receipts held in trust. Amounts
are withdrawn from the trusts when the contract obligations are
performed. Cash flows from preneed cemetery contracts are
presented as operating cash flows in our consolidated statement
of cash flows.
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments are
reduced by the trust investment earnings (realized and
unrealized) that we have been allowed to withdraw in certain
states prior to maturity. These earnings are recorded in
Deferred preneed cemetery revenues until the service is
performed or the merchandise is delivered.
69
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The table below sets forth the investment-related activities
associated with our cemetery merchandise and service trusts for
the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
106,724
|
|
|
$
|
115,651
|
|
|
$
|
117,518
|
|
Withdrawals
|
|
$
|
132,725
|
|
|
$
|
148,627
|
|
|
$
|
88,673
|
|
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
|
|
$
|
846,679
|
|
|
$
|
1,067,208
|
|
|
$
|
772,923
|
|
Sales of available-for-sale securities
|
|
$
|
424,009
|
|
|
$
|
1,377,914
|
|
|
$
|
990,138
|
|
Realized gains from sales of available-for-sale securities
|
|
$
|
47,411
|
|
|
$
|
196,880
|
|
|
$
|
100,326
|
|
Realized losses from sales of available-for-sale securities
|
|
$
|
(85,527
|
)
|
|
$
|
(77,529
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47,256
|
)
|
The components of Preneed cemetery receivables and trust
investments in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Trust investments, at market
|
|
$
|
659,149
|
|
|
$
|
759,215
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
139,753
|
|
|
|
399,301
|
|
Receivables from customers
|
|
|
341,688
|
|
|
|
351,409
|
|
Unearned finance charges
|
|
|
(48,999
|
)
|
|
|
(47,527
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,091,591
|
|
|
|
1,462,398
|
|
Allowance for cancellation
|
|
|
(28,639
|
)
|
|
|
(34,341
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments
|
|
$
|
1,062,952
|
|
|
$
|
1,428,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An allowance for contract cancellation is estimated based on
historical experience. If a preneed cemetery contract is
cancelled prior to delivery, state or provincial law determines
the amount of the refund owed to the customer, if any, including
the amount of the attributed investment earnings. Upon
cancellation, we receive the amount of principal deposited to
trust and previously undistributed net investment earnings and,
where required, issue a refund to the customer. We retain excess
funds, if any, and recognize the attributed investment earnings
(net of any investment earnings payable to the customer) as
revenue in our consolidated statement of operations. In certain
jurisdictions, we may be obligated to fund any shortfall if the
amounts deposited by the customer exceed the funds in trust.
Funds in trust assets exceeded customer deposits at the year
ended December 31, 2008.
70
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The activity in Preneed cemetery receivables and trust
investments for the years ended December 31 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Beginning balance Preneed cemetery receivables and
trust investments
|
|
$
|
1,428,057
|
|
|
$
|
1,522,584
|
|
|
$
|
1,288,515
|
|
Net preneed contract sales
|
|
|
424,939
|
|
|
|
499,965
|
|
|
|
324,713
|
|
Acquisitions (dispositions) of businesses, net
|
|
|
8,728
|
|
|
|
(105,428
|
)
|
|
|
155,224
|
|
Net undistributed investment (losses) earnings(1)
|
|
|
(336,263
|
)
|
|
|
88,700
|
|
|
|
107,760
|
|
Cash receipts from customers, net of refunds
|
|
|
(432,468
|
)
|
|
|
(521,475
|
)
|
|
|
(381,688
|
)
|
Deposits to trust
|
|
|
106,724
|
|
|
|
115,651
|
|
|
|
117,518
|
|
Maturities, deliveries, and associated earnings
|
|
|
(132,725
|
)
|
|
|
(148,627
|
)
|
|
|
(88,673
|
)
|
Change in cancellation allowance
|
|
|
8,328
|
|
|
|
9,124
|
|
|
|
890
|
|
Effect of foreign currency and other
|
|
|
(12,368
|
)
|
|
|
(32,437
|
)
|
|
|
(1,675
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance Preneed cemetery receivables and
trust investments
|
|
$
|
1,062,952
|
|
|
$
|
1,428,057
|
|
|
$
|
1,522,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes both realized and unrealized investment (losses)
earnings. |
The cost and market values associated with our cemetery
merchandise and service trust investments recorded at fair
market value at December 31, 2008 and 2007 are detailed
below. Cost reflects the investment (net of redemptions) of
control holders in common trust funds, mutual funds, and private
equity investments. Fair market value represents the value of
the underlying securities held by the common trust funds, mutual
funds at published values, and the estimated market value of
private equity investments. The fair market value of cemetery
trust investments was 71% and 104% of the related cost basis of
such investments as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
71
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
60,699
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
(19,146
|
)
|
|
|
41,692
|
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
11,949
|
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,415
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
9,726
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
(520
|
)
|
|
|
9,336
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
21,832
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(6,867
|
)
|
|
|
15,015
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
457,248
|
|
|
|
1,279
|
|
|
|
(136,109
|
)
|
|
|
322,418
|
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
203,032
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
(67,330
|
)
|
|
|
136,182
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
189,492
|
|
|
|
952
|
|
|
|
(55,452
|
)
|
|
|
134,992
|
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
36,949
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
(6,323
|
)
|
|
|
31,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust investments
|
|
$
|
990,927
|
|
|
$
|
4,707
|
|
|
$
|
(291,747
|
)
|
|
$
|
703,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Assets associated with businesses held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,738
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
659,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
19,371
|
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
20,065
|
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
14,016
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,312
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
17,297
|
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
17,659
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
2,979
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
3,090
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
402,028
|
|
|
|
20,923
|
|
|
|
(5,956
|
)
|
|
|
416,995
|
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
182,214
|
|
|
|
12,905
|
|
|
|
(2,861
|
)
|
|
|
192,258
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
126,728
|
|
|
|
5,535
|
|
|
|
(1,185
|
)
|
|
|
131,078
|
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
26,124
|
|
|
|
2,103
|
|
|
|
(3,493
|
)
|
|
|
24,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust investments
|
|
$
|
790,757
|
|
|
$
|
43,257
|
|
|
$
|
(13,823
|
)
|
|
$
|
820,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Assets associated with businesses held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60,976
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
759,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where quoted prices are available in an active market,
securities held by the common trust funds and mutual funds are
classified as Level 1 investments pursuant to the
three-level valuation hierarchy provided in SFAS 157. Our
investments classified as Level 1 securities include common
stock and mutual funds.
72
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Where quoted market prices are not available for the specific
security, fair values are estimated by using either quoted
prices of securities with similar characteristics or a fair
value model with observable inputs that include a combination of
interest rates, yield curves, credit risks, prepayment speeds,
rating, and tax-exempt status. These securities included United
States (U.S.) Treasury, foreign government, corporate, and
mortgage-backed fixed income securities, and preferred stock
equity securities, all of which are classified within
Level 2 of the SFAS 157 valuation hierarchy.
The valuation of private equity and other investments requires
significant management judgment due to the absence of quoted
market prices, inherent lack of liquidity, or the long-term
nature of such assets. The fair value of these investments is
estimated based on the market value of the underlying real
estate and private equity investments. The underlying real
estate value is determined using the most recent available
appraisals. Private equity investments are valued using market
appraisals or a discounted cash flow methodology depending on
the nature of the underlying assets. The appraisals assess value
based on a combination of replacement cost, comparative sales
analysis, and discounted cash flow analysis. As a result of the
adoption of SFAS 157 in the first quarter of 2008, we
recorded a $2.9 million decrease in the fair value of our
private equity investments held by the cemetery merchandise and
service trusts to reflect time-based restrictions on the exit
from the investments. As a result of the adoption, we recorded
the decrease and a corresponding increase in Other
comprehensive income in our consolidated balance sheet. Our
private equity and other investments are included within
Level 3 of the SFAS 157 valuation hierarchy. We
further reviewed our private equity and other investments in
accordance with the guidance included in FSP
SFAS 157-3
(see Note 3) and determined that no additional adjustments
to fair value were required.
The inputs into the fair value of our market-based cemetery
merchandise and service trust investments are categorized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Quoted Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in Active
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
Markets
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
Fair Market Value
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Trust investments
|
|
$
|
593,592
|
|
|
$
|
78,458
|
|
|
$
|
31,837
|
|
|
$
|
703,887
|
|
The change in our market-based cemetery merchandise and service
trust investments with significant unobservable inputs
(Level 3) is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fair market value, January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
21,809
|
|
Total unrealized losses included in Other comprehensive
income(1)
|
|
|
(3,109
|
)
|
Total realized gains included in Other income, net(2)
|
|
|
325
|
|
Purchases, sales, contributions, and distributions, net
|
|
|
12,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair market value, December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
31,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All gains (losses) recognized in Other comprehensive income
for our cemetery merchandise and service trust investments
are attributable to our preneed customers and are offset by a
corresponding increase (decrease) in Deferred preneed
cemetery receipts held in trust. See Note 7 for further
information related to our Deferred preneed cemetery receipts
held in trust. |
|
(2) |
|
All gains (losses) recognized in Other income, net for
our cemetery merchandise and service trust investments are
attributable to our preneed customers and are offset by a
corresponding increase (decrease) in Deferred preneed
cemetery receipts held in trust. See Note 7 for further
information related to our Deferred preneed cemetery receipts
held in trust. |
73
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Maturity dates of our fixed income securities range from 2009 to
2038. Maturities of fixed income securities at December 31,
2008 are estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
1,286
|
|
Due in one to five years
|
|
|
25,756
|
|
Due in five to ten years
|
|
|
25,118
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
26,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
78,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We assess our trust investments for other-than-temporary
declines in fair value on a quarterly basis. Impairment charges,
if any, as a result of this assessment, which reduce the
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments, are
recognized as investment losses in Other expense, net in
our consolidated statement of operations and are offset by the
corresponding reclassification in Other expense, net,
which reduces Deferred preneed cemetery receipts held in
trust. See Note 7 for further information related to
our Deferred preneed cemetery receipts held in trust.
During 2008, we recorded an $11.4 million impairment charge
for other-than-temporary declines in fair value related to
unrealized losses on certain equity securities. In the second
quarter of 2007, we recorded a $3.2 million impairment
charge for other-than-temporary declines in fair value related
to unrealized losses on certain private equity and other
investments.
We have determined that the remaining unrealized losses in our
cemetery trust investments are considered temporary in nature,
as the unrealized losses were due to temporary fluctuations in
interest rates and equity prices. The investments are
diversified across multiple industry segments using a balanced
allocation strategy to minimize long-term risk. The unrealized
losses reflect the effects of the current economic crisis. We
believe that none of the securities are other-than-temporarily
impaired based on our analysis of the investments, which
included a review of the portfolio holdings, discussions with
the individual money managers as to the sector exposures, credit
ratings, and the severity and duration of the unrealized losses.
Our cemetery trust investment unrealized losses, their
associated fair market value and the duration of unrealized
losses as of December 31, 2008, are shown in the following
table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
Greater Than 12 Months
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
$
|
34,817
|
|
|
$
|
(15,637
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,757
|
|
|
$
|
(3,509
|
)
|
|
$
|
40,574
|
|
|
$
|
(19,146
|
)
|
Corporate
|
|
|
4,204
|
|
|
|
(435
|
)
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
4,317
|
|
|
|
(520
|
)
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
12,491
|
|
|
|
(5,610
|
)
|
|
|
2,066
|
|
|
|
(1,257
|
)
|
|
|
14,557
|
|
|
|
(6,867
|
)
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
265,985
|
|
|
|
(119,166
|
)
|
|
|
42,575
|
|
|
|
(16,943
|
)
|
|
|
308,560
|
|
|
|
(136,109
|
)
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
101,895
|
|
|
|
(46,405
|
)
|
|
|
29,282
|
|
|
|
(20,925
|
)
|
|
|
131,177
|
|
|
|
(67,330
|
)
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
100,882
|
|
|
|
(46,308
|
)
|
|
|
15,045
|
|
|
|
(9,144
|
)
|
|
|
115,927
|
|
|
|
(55,452
|
)
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
1,179
|
|
|
|
(413
|
)
|
|
|
13,469
|
|
|
|
(5,910
|
)
|
|
|
14,648
|
|
|
|
(6,323
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities
|
|
$
|
521,453
|
|
|
$
|
(233,974
|
)
|
|
$
|
108,307
|
|
|
$
|
(57,773
|
)
|
|
$
|
629,760
|
|
|
$
|
(291,747
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Earnings from all trust investments are recognized in current
cemetery revenues when the service is performed or the
merchandise is delivered. In addition, we are entitled to
retain, in certain jurisdictions, a portion of collected
customer payments when a customer cancels a preneed contract;
these amounts are also recognized in current revenues.
Recognized earnings (realized and unrealized) related to these
trust investments were $9.2 million, $25.9 million,
and $15.0 million for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.
Deferred
Preneed Cemetery Revenues
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, Deferred preneed cemetery
revenues, net of allowance for cancellation, represent
future cemetery revenues, including distributed trust investment
earnings associated with unperformed trust-funded preneed
cemetery contracts that are not held in trust accounts.
Deferred preneed cemetery revenues are recognized in
current cemetery revenues when the service is performed or
merchandise delivered. Future cemetery revenues and net trust
investment earnings that are held in trust accounts are included
in Deferred preneed cemetery receipts held in trust.
The following table summarizes the activity in Deferred
preneed cemetery revenues for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Beginning balance Deferred preneed cemetery revenues
|
|
$
|
753,876
|
|
|
$
|
754,193
|
|
|
$
|
792,485
|
|
Net preneed and atneed deferred sales
|
|
|
338,114
|
|
|
|
374,412
|
|
|
|
311,077
|
|
Acquisitions (dispositions) of businesses, net
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
(20,321
|
)
|
|
|
(12,073
|
)
|
Net investment (losses) earnings(1)
|
|
|
(299,422
|
)
|
|
|
91,601
|
|
|
|
103,587
|
|
Recognized deferred preneed revenues
|
|
|
(356,501
|
)
|
|
|
(405,891
|
)
|
|
|
(320,076
|
)
|
Change in cancellation allowance
|
|
|
7,866
|
|
|
|
3,233
|
|
|
|
2,711
|
|
Change in deferred preneed cemetery receipts held in trust
|
|
|
330,333
|
|
|
|
(21,347
|
)
|
|
|
(129,180
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency and other
|
|
|
(3,678
|
)
|
|
|
(22,004
|
)
|
|
|
5,662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance Deferred preneed cemetery revenues
|
|
$
|
771,117
|
|
|
$
|
753,876
|
|
|
$
|
754,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes both realized and unrealized investment (losses)
earnings. |
|
|
6.
|
Cemetery
Perpetual Care Trusts
|
We are required by state or provincial law to pay into perpetual
care trusts a portion of the proceeds from the sale of cemetery
property interment rights. Our cemetery perpetual care trusts
are defined as variable interest entities pursuant to FIN46(R);
also, per FIN46(R), we have determined that we are the primary
beneficiary of these trusts, as we absorb both a majority of the
losses and returns associated with our trusts. The trust
investments detailed in Notes 4 and 5 are accounted for in
the same manner, in accordance with FIN46(R). We consolidate our
cemetery perpetual care trust investments with a corresponding
amount recorded as Care trusts corpus. Cash flows
from cemetery perpetual care contracts are presented as
operating cash flows in our consolidated statement of cash flows.
75
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The table below sets forth the investment-related activities
associated with our cemetery perpetual care trusts for the years
ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
23,347
|
|
|
$
|
26,253
|
|
|
$
|
22,477
|
|
Withdrawals
|
|
$
|
31,628
|
|
|
$
|
26,377
|
|
|
$
|
43,254
|
|
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
|
|
$
|
218,140
|
|
|
$
|
727,682
|
|
|
$
|
915,880
|
|
Sales of available-for-sale securities
|
|
$
|
222,445
|
|
|
$
|
470,749
|
|
|
$
|
1,082,707
|
|
Realized gains from sales of available-for-sale securities
|
|
$
|
19,070
|
|
|
$
|
45,203
|
|
|
$
|
40,934
|
|
Realized losses from sales of available-for-sale securities
|
|
$
|
(32,312
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,339
|
)
|
|
$
|
(26,675
|
)
|
The components of Cemetery perpetual care trust investments
in our consolidated balance sheet at December 31 were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Trust investments, at market
|
|
$
|
673,237
|
|
|
$
|
817,228
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
71,521
|
|
|
|
88,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments
|
|
$
|
744,758
|
|
|
$
|
905,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cost and market values associated with our cemetery
perpetual care trust investments recorded at fair market value
at December 31, 2008 and 2007 are detailed below. Cost
reflects the investment (net of redemptions) of control holders
in common trust funds, mutual funds, and private equity
investments. Fair market value represents the value of the
underlying securities or cash held by the common trust funds,
mutual funds at published values, and the estimated market value
of private equity investments. The fair market value of
perpetual care trusts was 81% and 100% of the related cost basis
of such investments as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
5,805
|
|
|
|
769
|
|
|
|
(808
|
)
|
|
|
5,766
|
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
20,837
|
|
|
|
773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,610
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
42,139
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
(5,079
|
)
|
|
|
37,262
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
4,376
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(835
|
)
|
|
|
3,542
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
5,558
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1,186
|
)
|
|
|
4,373
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
112,453
|
|
|
|
1,373
|
|
|
|
(23,487
|
)
|
|
|
90,339
|
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
90,044
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(20,931
|
)
|
|
|
69,138
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
519,132
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
(106,187
|
)
|
|
|
413,178
|
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
53,043
|
|
|
|
1,484
|
|
|
|
(6,251
|
)
|
|
|
48,276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments
|
|
$
|
853,387
|
|
|
$
|
4,861
|
|
|
$
|
(164,764
|
)
|
|
$
|
693,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Assets associated with businesses held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,247
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
673,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
2,647
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
3,349
|
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
25,065
|
|
|
|
789
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
25,841
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
42,437
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
(555
|
)
|
|
|
42,107
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
2,358
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
128,815
|
|
|
|
3,501
|
|
|
|
(2,840
|
)
|
|
|
129,476
|
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
44,221
|
|
|
|
1,208
|
|
|
|
(1,003
|
)
|
|
|
44,426
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
555,509
|
|
|
|
3,256
|
|
|
|
(10,714
|
)
|
|
|
548,051
|
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
34,894
|
|
|
|
3,145
|
|
|
|
(542
|
)
|
|
|
37,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments
|
|
$
|
836,339
|
|
|
$
|
12,847
|
|
|
$
|
(15,726
|
)
|
|
$
|
833,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Assets associated with businesses held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,232
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
817,228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where quoted prices are available in an active market,
securities held by the common trust funds and mutual funds are
classified as Level 1 investments pursuant to the
three-level valuation hierarchy provided in SFAS 157. Our
investments classified as Level 1 securities include common
stock and mutual funds.
Where quoted market prices are not available for the specific
security, fair values are estimated by using either quoted
prices of securities with similar characteristics or a fair
value model with observable inputs that include a combination of
interest rates, yield curves, credit risks, prepayment speeds,
rating, and tax-exempt status. These securities included United
States (U.S.) Treasury, foreign government, corporate,
mortgage-backed and asset-backed fixed income securities, and
preferred stock equity securities, all of which are classified
within Level 2 of the SFAS 157 valuation hierarchy.
The valuation of private equity and other investments requires
significant management judgment due to the absence of quoted
market prices, inherent lack of liquidity, or the long-term
nature of such assets. The fair value of these investments is
estimated based on the market value of the underlying real
estate and private equity investments. The underlying real
estate value is determined using the most recent available
appraisals. Private equity investments are valued using market
appraisals or a discounted cash flow methodology depending on
the nature of the underlying assets. The appraisals assess value
based on a combination of replacement cost, comparative sales
analysis, and discounted cash flow analysis. As a result of the
adoption of SFAS 157 in the first quarter of 2008, we
recorded a $4.9 million decrease in the fair value of our
private equity investments held by the cemetery perpetual care
trusts to reflect time-based restrictions on the exit from the
investments. As a result of the adoption, we recorded the
decrease and a corresponding increase in Other comprehensive
income in our consolidated balance sheet. Our private equity
and other investments are included within Level 3 of the
SFAS 157 valuation hierarchy. We further reviewed our
private equity and other investments in accordance with the
guidance included in FSP
SFAS 157-3
(see Note 3) and determined that no additional adjustments
to fair value were required.
77
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The inputs into the fair value of our market-based cemetery
perpetual care investments are categorized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Quoted Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in Active
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
Markets
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
Fair Market Value
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Trust investments
|
|
$
|
572,655
|
|
|
$
|
72,553
|
|
|
$
|
48,276
|
|
|
$
|
693,484
|
|
The change in our market-based cemetery perpetual care trust
investments with significant unobservable inputs
(Level 3) is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fair market value, January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
32,644
|
|
Total unrealized losses included in Other comprehensive
income(1)
|
|
|
(13,569
|
)
|
Total realized gains included in Other expense, net(2)
|
|
|
32
|
|
Purchases, sales, contributions, and distributions, net
|
|
|
29,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair market value, December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
48,276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All gains (losses) recognized in Other comprehensive income
for our cemetery perpetual care trust investments are
attributable to our customers and are offset by a corresponding
increase (decrease) in Care trusts corpus. See
Note 7 for further information related to our Care
trusts corpus. |
|
(2) |
|
All gains (losses) recognized in Other expense, net for
our cemetery perpetual care trust investments are attributable
to our customers and are offset by a corresponding
reclassification in Other expense, net to Care
trusts corpus. See Note 7 for further information
related to our Care trusts corpus. |
We assess our trust investments for other-than-temporary
declines in fair value on a quarterly basis. Impairment charges,
if any, as a result of this assessment, which reduce the
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments, are recognized
as investment losses in Other expense, net in our
consolidated statement of operations and are offset by the
corresponding reclassification in Other expense, net,
which reduces Care trusts corpus. See Note 7
for further information related to our Care trusts
corpus. During 2008 we recorded a $2.0 million
impairment charge for
other-than-temporary
declines in fair value related to unrealized losses on certain
equity securities. In the second quarter of 2007, we recorded a
$1.2 million impairment charge for other-than-temporary
declines in fair value related to unrealized losses on certain
private equity and other investments.
78
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We have determined that the remaining unrealized losses in our
cemetery perpetual care trust investments are considered
temporary in nature, as the unrealized losses were due to
temporary fluctuations in interest rates and equity prices. The
investments are diversified across multiple industry segments
using a balanced allocation strategy to minimize long-term risk.
The unrealized losses reflect the effects of the current
economic crisis. We believe that none of the securities are
other-than-temporarily impaired based on our analysis of the
investments. Our analysis included a review of the portfolio
holdings, and discussions with the individual money managers as
to the sector exposures, credit ratings, and the severity and
duration of the unrealized losses. Our cemetery perpetual care
trust investment unrealized losses, their associated fair market
values and the duration of unrealized losses as of
December 31, 2008, are shown in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
Greater Than 12 Months
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
$
|
2,729
|
|
|
$
|
(435
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,358
|
|
|
$
|
(373
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,087
|
|
|
$
|
(808
|
)
|
Corporate
|
|
|
17,224
|
|
|
|
(2,997
|
)
|
|
|
9,932
|
|
|
|
(2,082
|
)
|
|
|
27,156
|
|
|
|
(5,079
|
)
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
1,705
|
|
|
|
(410
|
)
|
|
|
1,507
|
|
|
|
(425
|
)
|
|
|
3,212
|
|
|
|
(835
|
)
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
2,335
|
|
|
|
(562
|
)
|
|
|
2,085
|
|
|
|
(624
|
)
|
|
|
4,420
|
|
|
|
(1,186
|
)
|
Common stock
|
|
|
48,676
|
|
|
|
(12,937
|
)
|
|
|
37,292
|
|
|
|
(10,550
|
)
|
|
|
85,968
|
|
|
|
(23,487
|
)
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
40,611
|
|
|
|
(11,959
|
)
|
|
|
28,635
|
|
|
|
(8,972
|
)
|
|
|
69,246
|
|
|
|
(20,931
|
)
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
231,564
|
|
|
|
(53,735
|
)
|
|
|
182,207
|
|
|
|
(52,452
|
)
|
|
|
413,771
|
|
|
|
(106,187
|
)
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
19,480
|
|
|
|
(3,476
|
)
|
|
|
10,582
|
|
|
|
(2,775
|
)
|
|
|
30,062
|
|
|
|
(6,251
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities
|
|
$
|
364,324
|
|
|
$
|
(86,511
|
)
|
|
$
|
273,598
|
|
|
$
|
(78,253
|
)
|
|
$
|
637,922
|
|
|
$
|
(164,764
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity dates of our fixed income securities range from 2009 to
2038. Maturities of fixed income securities at December 31,
2008 are estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
2,929
|
|
Due in one to five years
|
|
|
35,444
|
|
Due in five to ten years
|
|
|
13,734
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
16,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
68,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributable earnings from these cemetery perpetual care trust
investments are recognized in current cemetery revenues to the
extent we have incurred qualifying cemetery maintenance costs.
Recognized earnings related to these cemetery perpetual care
trust investments were $36.0 million, $44.9 million,
and $42.1 million for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.
79
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
7.
|
Deferred
Preneed Funeral and Cemetery Receipts Held in Trust and Care
Trusts Corpus
|
Deferred
Preneed Funeral and Cemetery Receipts Held in
Trust
We consolidate in our balance sheet the merchandise and service
trusts associated with our preneed funeral and cemetery
activities in accordance with FIN 46R. Although
FIN 46R requires the consolidation of the merchandise and
service trusts, it does not change the legal relationships among
the trusts, us or our customers. The customers are the legal
beneficiaries of these merchandise and service trusts, and
therefore their interests in these trusts represent a liability.
The components of Deferred preneed funeral and cemetery
receipts held in trust in our consolidated balance sheet at
December 31 are detailed below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Preneed
|
|
|
Preneed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Trust investments, at market
|
|
$
|
636,712
|
|
|
$
|
659,149
|
|
|
$
|
1,295,861
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
125,657
|
|
|
|
139,753
|
|
|
|
265,410
|
|
Insurance-backed fixed income securities
|
|
|
216,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216,394
|
|
Accrued trust operating payables, deferred tax assets, and other
|
|
|
16,816
|
|
|
|
23,184
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust
|
|
$
|
995,579
|
|
|
$
|
822,086
|
|
|
$
|
1,817,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Preneed
|
|
|
Preneed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Trust investments, at market
|
|
$
|
848,195
|
|
|
$
|
759,215
|
|
|
$
|
1,607,410
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
194,728
|
|
|
|
399,301
|
|
|
|
594,029
|
|
Insurance-backed fixed income securities
|
|
|
201,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201,258
|
|
Accrued trust operating payables, deferred tax liabilities, and
other
|
|
|
(3,737
|
)
|
|
|
(8,672
|
)
|
|
|
(12,409
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust
|
|
$
|
1,240,444
|
|
|
$
|
1,149,844
|
|
|
$
|
2,390,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Care
Trusts Corpus
The Care trusts corpus reflected in our
consolidated balance sheet represents the cemetery perpetual
care trusts, net of the accrued expenses and other long-term
liabilities of our perpetual care trusts.
The components of Care trusts corpus in our
consolidated balance sheet at December 31 are detailed below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Trust investments, at market
|
|
$
|
673,237
|
|
|
$
|
817,228
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
71,521
|
|
|
|
88,516
|
|
Accrued trust operating payables, deferred tax assets, and other
|
|
|
27,476
|
|
|
|
846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Care trusts corpus
|
|
$
|
772,234
|
|
|
$
|
906,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Other
Expense, Net
The components of Other expense, net in our consolidated
statement of operations for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007, and 2006 are detailed below. See Notes 4, 5,
and 6 for further discussion of the amounts related to the
funeral, cemetery and perpetual care trusts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
Cemetery Perpetual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trusts
|
|
|
Trusts
|
|
|
Care Trusts
|
|
|
Other, Net(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Realized gains
|
|
$
|
46,703
|
|
|
$
|
47,411
|
|
|
$
|
19,070
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
113,184
|
|
Realized losses and impairment charges
|
|
|
(85,298
|
)
|
|
|
(96,919
|
)
|
|
|
(34,338
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(216,555
|
)
|
Interest, dividend, and other ordinary income
|
|
|
43,265
|
|
|
|
31,894
|
|
|
|
37,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,336
|
|
Trust expenses and income taxes
|
|
|
(14,090
|
)
|
|
|
(22,619
|
)
|
|
|
(837
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,546
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net trust investment (loss) income
|
|
|
(9,420
|
)
|
|
|
(40,233
|
)
|
|
|
21,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,581
|
)
|
Reclassification to deferred preneed funeral and cemetery
receipts held in trust
|
|
|
9,420
|
|
|
|
40,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,653
|
|
Reclassification to care trusts corpus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,072
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,072
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in
trust and care trusts corpus
|
|
|
9,420
|
|
|
|
40,233
|
|
|
|
(21,072
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,581
|
|
Other expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(629
|
)
|
|
|
(629
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense, net
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(629
|
)
|
|
$
|
(629
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
Cemetery Perpetual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trusts
|
|
|
Trusts
|
|
|
Care Trusts
|
|
|
Other, Net(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Realized gains
|
|
$
|
106,394
|
|
|
$
|
196,880
|
|
|
$
|
45,203
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
348,477
|
|
Realized losses and impairment charges
|
|
|
(33,507
|
)
|
|
|
(80,732
|
)
|
|
|
(16,505
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(130,744
|
)
|
Interest, dividend, and other ordinary income
|
|
|
26,791
|
|
|
|
41,218
|
|
|
|
40,713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,722
|
|
Trust expenses and income taxes
|
|
|
(10,534
|
)
|
|
|
(17,264
|
)
|
|
|
(4,644
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,442
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net trust investment income
|
|
|
89,144
|
|
|
|
140,102
|
|
|
|
64,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,013
|
|
Reclassification to deferred preneed funeral and cemetery
receipts held in trust
|
|
|
(89,144
|
)
|
|
|
(140,102
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(229,246
|
)
|
Reclassification to care trusts corpus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64,767
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64,767
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in
trust and care trusts corpus
|
|
|
(89,144
|
)
|
|
|
(140,102
|
)
|
|
|
(64,767
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(294,013
|
)
|
Other expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,804
|
)
|
|
|
(3,804
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense, net
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3,804
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,804
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
Cemetery Perpetual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trusts
|
|
|
Trusts
|
|
|
Care Trusts
|
|
|
Other, Net(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Realized gains
|
|
$
|
83,350
|
|
|
$
|
100,326
|
|
|
$
|
40,934
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
224,610
|
|
Realized losses
|
|
|
(36,653
|
)
|
|
|
(47,256
|
)
|
|
|
(26,675
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110,584
|
)
|
Interest, dividend, and other ordinary income
|
|
|
22,614
|
|
|
|
36,337
|
|
|
|
30,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,832
|
|
Trust expenses and income taxes
|
|
|
(8,492
|
)
|
|
|
(12,989
|
)
|
|
|
(2,148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,629
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net trust investment income
|
|
|
60,819
|
|
|
|
76,418
|
|
|
|
42,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,229
|
|
Reclassification to deferred preneed funeral and cemetery
receipts held in trust
|
|
|
(60,819
|
)
|
|
|
(76,418
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(137,237
|
)
|
Reclassification to care trusts corpus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,992
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,992
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in
trust and care trusts corpus
|
|
|
(60,819
|
)
|
|
|
(76,418
|
)
|
|
|
(42,992
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(180,229
|
)
|
Other expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,453
|
)
|
|
|
(1,453
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense, net
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,453
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,453
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts included within Other expense, net primarily
relate to foreign currency gains and losses and surety bonding
expenses. |
82
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill for our funeral
and cemetery segments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
1,241,666
|
|
|
$
|
22,606
|
|
|
$
|
1,264,272
|
|
Reduction in goodwill related to the Alderwoods acquisition
|
|
|
(86,437
|
)
|
|
|
(1,561
|
)
|
|
|
(87,998
|
)
|
Increase in goodwill related to other acquisitions
|
|
|
984
|
|
|
|
6,432
|
|
|
|
7,416
|
|
Reduction of goodwill related to dispositions
|
|
|
(27,045
|
)
|
|
|
(179
|
)
|
|
|
(27,224
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency and other
|
|
|
41,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
1,170,855
|
|
|
$
|
27,298
|
|
|
$
|
1,198,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in goodwill related to acquisitions
|
|
|
22,162
|
|
|
|
25,876
|
|
|
|
48,038
|
|
Reduction of goodwill related to dispositions
|
|
|
(9,930
|
)
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
(10,071
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency and other
|
|
|
(58,868
|
)
|
|
|
1,717
|
|
|
|
(57,151
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
1,124,219
|
|
|
$
|
54,750
|
|
|
$
|
1,178,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2007, we adjusted our goodwill for various purchase price
allocation adjustments as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to fair value of deferred revenue
|
|
$
|
(2,681
|
)
|
Adjustments to fair value of intangible assets
|
|
|
35,158
|
|
Adjustments to fair value of trust assets
|
|
|
26,906
|
|
Adjustments to fair value of acquired locations
|
|
|
(49,469
|
)
|
Adjustments to deferred taxes
|
|
|
(93,656
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(4,256
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustment to Alderwoods goodwill
|
|
$
|
(87,998
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2007, we finalized our assessment of the fair value of
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in our Alderwoods
acquisition. Accordingly, we reflected the final impact of the
assessment on goodwill and deferred federal income taxes,
including the impact of the adoption of FIN 48 as explained
in Note 9. Additionally, we recorded adjustments to our
acquired Alderwoods goodwill related to our verification of the
contract status and fair values of preneed cemetery and funeral
deferred revenues and related trust and intangible assets. We
also adjusted the fair values of certain assets and liabilities
sold during 2007 in relation to certain Alderwoods locations
mandated for divestment pursuant to our recent FTC decree.
During 2008, we recorded certain adjustments to goodwill related
to income tax and other effects of prior business combinations,
in the amount of $42.8 million.
The provision or benefit for income taxes includes
U.S. federal income taxes, determined on a consolidated
return basis, foreign and state income taxes.
83
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Income from continuing operations before income taxes for the
years ended December 31 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
125,694
|
|
|
$
|
369,730
|
|
|
$
|
85,928
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
37,468
|
|
|
|
17,257
|
|
|
|
11,521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
163,162
|
|
|
$
|
386,987
|
|
|
$
|
97,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit) for the years ended December 31
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
(60,270
|
)
|
|
$
|
84,405
|
|
|
$
|
2,522
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
11,285
|
|
|
|
8,296
|
|
|
|
8,236
|
|
State
|
|
|
5,584
|
|
|
|
16,317
|
|
|
|
(4,170
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current income taxes
|
|
|
(43,401
|
)
|
|
|
109,018
|
|
|
|
6,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
99,752
|
|
|
$
|
16,058
|
|
|
$
|
33,114
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
(1,982
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
8,721
|
|
|
|
18,804
|
|
|
|
7,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred income taxes
|
|
|
109,118
|
|
|
|
34,652
|
|
|
|
38,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income taxes
|
|
$
|
65,717
|
|
|
$
|
143,670
|
|
|
$
|
44,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The current benefit associated with U.S. income taxes in
2008 is related to the refund of 2007 estimated taxes. We made
income tax payments, net of refunds, of $20.1 million,
$44.5 million, and $15.6 million in 2008, 2007, and
2006, respectively.
The differences between the U.S. federal statutory income
tax rate and our effective tax rate for the years ended December
31 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Computed tax provision at the applicable federal statutory
income tax rate
|
|
$
|
57,107
|
|
|
$
|
135,446
|
|
|
$
|
34,108
|
|
State and local taxes, net of federal income tax benefits
|
|
|
9,298
|
|
|
|
22,829
|
|
|
|
1,921
|
|
Dividends received deduction and tax exempt interest
|
|
|
(1,177
|
)
|
|
|
(1,453
|
)
|
|
|
(686
|
)
|
Foreign jurisdiction differences
|
|
|
(4,975
|
)
|
|
|
(1,349
|
)
|
|
|
(1,343
|
)
|
Write down of assets and other losses with no tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,471
|
|
Permanent differences associated with dispositions
|
|
|
2,586
|
|
|
|
14,611
|
|
|
|
9,508
|
|
Changes in uncertain tax positions
|
|
|
818
|
|
|
|
(29,287
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,060
|
|
|
|
2,873
|
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
65,717
|
|
|
$
|
143,670
|
|
|
$
|
44,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total effective tax rate
|
|
|
40.3
|
%
|
|
|
37.1
|
%
|
|
|
46.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the fourth quarter of 2007, we generated taxable capital
gains on the sale of our investment in our French unconsolidated
subsidiary (See Note 19) which allowed us to recognize
the benefit of capital loss
84
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
carryforwards that we had previously concluded were more likely
than not to expire unutilized because of uncertainty with
respect to the timing of the deduction. That benefit decreased
our 2007 effective tax rate by nine percentage points. Our 2008,
2007, and 2006 effective tax rates were negatively impacted by
permanent differences between the book and tax bases of North
American asset dispositions.
Deferred taxes are determined based on differences between the
financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and
are measured using the enacted tax rates. The tax effects of
temporary differences and carryforwards that give rise to
significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities as
of December 31 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Inventories and cemetery property, principally due to purchase
accounting adjustments
|
|
$
|
(330,413
|
)
|
|
$
|
(325,051
|
)
|
Property and equipment, principally due to differences in
depreciation methods and purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
(78,765
|
)
|
|
|
(72,599
|
)
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
(55,984
|
)
|
|
|
(46,992
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(465,162
|
)
|
|
|
(444,883
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and tax credit carryforwards
|
|
|
181,890
|
|
|
|
271,581
|
|
Deferred revenue on preneed funeral and cemetery contracts,
principally due to earnings from trust funds
|
|
|
117,753
|
|
|
|
141,767
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
7,268
|
|
|
|
2,015
|
|
Receivables, principally due to sales of cemetery interment
rights and related products
|
|
|
6,131
|
|
|
|
30,548
|
|
Other
|
|
|
12,836
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
325,878
|
|
|
|
445,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(69,822
|
)
|
|
|
(68,469
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income taxes
|
|
$
|
(209,106
|
)
|
|
$
|
(67,441
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset and Deferred income taxes
consists of the following as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
$
|
79,571
|
|
|
$
|
73,182
|
|
Non-current portion
|
|
$
|
(288,677
|
)
|
|
$
|
(140,623
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability
|
|
$
|
(209,106
|
)
|
|
$
|
(67,441
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets relating to tax benefits of employee
share-based
compensation have been reduced to reflect stock options
exercised and restricted stock that vested. Some exercises and
vestings resulted in tax deductions in excess of previously
recorded benefits based on the option value at the time of grant
(windfalls). Pursuant to SFAS 123(R)
Share-Based
Payment, the additional tax benefit associated with the
windfall is not recognized unless the deduction reduces taxes
payable. Accordingly, since the tax benefit did not reduce our
current taxes payable in the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007 due to the existence of net operating loss carry
forwards, these windfall tax benefits are not
reflected in our deferred tax assets which resulted from net
operating losses. Windfalls not reflected as deferred tax assets
in the table above are $6.9 million and $18.5 million
for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
85
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, U.S. income taxes had
not been provided on $137.3 million and
$121.8 million, respectively, of the remaining
undistributed earnings of our Canadian subsidiaries. We intend
to permanently reinvest these undistributed foreign earnings in
those businesses outside the United States. It is not
practicable to determine the amount of federal income taxes, if
any, that might become due if such earnings are repatriated.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, which clarifies the
accounting for uncertain income tax positions recognized in an
enterprises financial statements in accordance with
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. This interpretation requires companies to use a
prescribed model for assessing the financial statement
recognition and measurement of all tax positions taken or
expected to be taken in its tax returns. FIN 48 also
provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and
transition.
The following table summarizes the activity related to our gross
unrecognized tax benefits from January 1, 2007 to
December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal, State and
|
|
|
|
Foreign Tax
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
198,773
|
|
Additions to tax positions related to the current year
|
|
|
803
|
|
Reductions to tax positions related to prior year
|
|
|
(45,115
|
)
|
Reductions to tax positions related to acquired entities in
prior years, offset to goodwill
|
|
|
(774
|
)
|
Statute expirations
|
|
|
(5,799
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
147,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to tax positions related to prior years
|
|
|
8,132
|
|
Reductions to tax positions related to acquired entities in
prior years, offset to goodwill
|
|
|
(8,700
|
)
|
Statute expirations
|
|
|
(4,863
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
142,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our total unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would
affect our effective tax rate was $51.6 million as of
December 31, 2008.
During 2008, we recorded an increase of $8.1 million to our
liability for unrecognized tax benefits primarily related to
U.S. and foreign tax positions taken in previous fiscal years,
of which $6.0 million was taken to goodwill. In addition,
we recorded a $13.6 million decrease to our FIN 48
liability due to the expiration of statute of limitation on
positions taken in previous fiscal years, of which
$8.7 million was offset to goodwill.
We adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1,
2007. As a result of the initial adoption of FIN 48, we
recognized a $12.0 million net increase in our liability
for unrecognized tax benefits, which was recorded as a
$24.0 million increase to goodwill (related to uncertain
tax positions acquired in the recent Alderwoods transaction) and
a $12.0 million decrease in our Accumulated deficit
as of January 1, 2007. As of the date of the initial
adoption and after considering the impact of recognizing the net
liability increase noted above, our unrecognized tax benefits
totaled $257.1 million, of which $156.3 million would
impact our effective tax rate, if recognized.
During the fourth quarter of 2007, we identified certain
computational errors in our initial FIN 48 adoption impact
related to both unrecognized tax benefits and the potential
accrued interest associated with such unrecognized tax benefits
at the time of adoption. The net effect of these computational
errors, including an $11.1 million adjustment for interest,
was recorded as a $17.9 million decrease in our liability
for unrecognized tax benefits
86
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
during the fourth quarter of 2007. As revised for this
immaterial correction of an error, our FIN 48 adoption
resulted in a $5.9 million reduction in our liability for
unrecognized tax benefits, of which $24.0 million was
recorded as an increase to goodwill and $29.9 million was
recorded as a decrease in our Accumulated deficit as of
January 1, 2007. As of the date of adoption and after
considering the impact of recognizing the immaterial correction
of an error noted above, our unrecognized tax benefits totalled
$198.8 million, of which $80.0 million would impact
our effective tax rate, if recognized.
Consistent with our historical financial reporting, we include
potential accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized
tax benefits within our income tax provision account. We have
accrued $32.2 million and $29.8 million for the
payment of interest, net of tax benefits, and penalties as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. To the extent
interest and penalties are not assessed with respect to
uncertain tax positions or the uncertainty of deductions in the
future, amounts accrued will be reduced and reflected as a
reduction of the overall income tax provision.
During the fourth quarter of 2007, we generated taxable capital
gains from the sale of our investment in our French operations
which allowed us to recognize the benefit of capital loss
carryforwards that we had previously concluded were more likely
than not to expire unutilized. The reduction to the tax
associated with prior years of $45.1 million primarily
relates to the recognition of capital loss carryforward amounts.
In 2008 and 2007, we recorded a net decrease in our liability
for uncertain tax positions of $4.9 million and
$5.8 million, respectively, relating to uncertain positions
taken in prior years, as a result of expiring federal, state,
and foreign statute of limitations.
We file income tax returns, including tax returns for our
subsidiaries, with federal, state, local, and foreign
jurisdictions. Our tax returns are subject to routine compliance
review by the taxing authorities in the jurisdictions in which
we file tax returns in the ordinary course of business. We
consider the United States to be our most significant tax
jurisdiction; however, the taxing authorities in France and
Spain are auditing various tax returns. Current audits are
occurring in the United States and various state and foreign
locations covering open tax years through 2006. The Internal
Revenue Service has recently completed its field work for tax
years 1999 through 2002 and is currently auditing tax years 2003
through 2005. It is reasonably possible that changes to our
global unrecognized tax benefits could be significant; however,
due to the uncertainty regarding the timing of completion of
audits and possible outcomes, a current estimate of the range of
increases or decreases that may occur within the next twelve
months cannot be made.
Various subsidiaries have foreign, federal, and state
carryforwards of $1.8 billion with expiration dates through
2028.
The loss carryforwards will expire as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
543
|
|
|
$
|
29,484
|
|
|
$
|
912
|
|
|
$
|
30,939
|
|
2010
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
16,417
|
|
|
|
1,216
|
|
|
|
17,787
|
|
2011
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
75,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,394
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,438
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
163,048
|
|
|
|
1,378,938
|
|
|
|
48,434
|
|
|
|
1,590,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
163,840
|
|
|
$
|
1,537,576
|
|
|
$
|
50,562
|
|
|
$
|
1,751,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe that some uncertainty exists with respect to future
realization of certain loss carryforwards, therefore a valuation
allowance has been established for those carryforwards where
more likely than not uncertainty exists. The valuation allowance
is primarily attributable to state net operating losses and is
due to complexities involving the various state laws restricting
state net operating loss utilization. The 2008 increase in
valuation
87
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
allowance is due to a $3.7 million increase in federal
valuation allowances related to acquisitions and a
$3.2 million increase in valuation allowances on tax losses
in foreign jurisdictions offset by a $5.5 million decrease
in valuation allowance on state operating losses. At
December 31, 2008, the loss and tax credit carryforward
deferred assets and associated valuation allowances by
jurisdiction are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
State
|
|
Foreign
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Loss and tax credit carryforwards
|
|
$
|
61,756
|
|
|
$
|
99,131
|
|
|
$
|
21,003
|
|
|
$
|
181,890
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
$
|
6,319
|
|
|
$
|
44,563
|
|
|
$
|
18,940
|
|
|
$
|
69,822
|
|
Debt as of December 31 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
6.5% notes due March 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
45,209
|
|
7.7% notes due April 2009
|
|
|
28,731
|
|
|
|
28,731
|
|
7.875% debentures due February 2013
|
|
|
55,627
|
|
|
|
55,627
|
|
7.375% senior notes due October 2014
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
6.75% notes due April 2015
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
6.75% notes due April 2016
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
7.0% notes due June 2017
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
7.625% senior notes due October 2018
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
7.5% notes due April 2027
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
Series B senior notes due November 2011
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
109,782
|
|
|
|
112,507
|
|
Mortgage notes and other debt, maturities through 2050
|
|
|
58,976
|
|
|
|
19,917
|
|
Unamortized pricing discounts and other
|
|
|
(4,608
|
)
|
|
|
(5,291
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
1,848,508
|
|
|
|
1,856,700
|
|
Less current maturities
|
|
|
(27,104
|
)
|
|
|
(36,594
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
1,821,404
|
|
|
$
|
1,820,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of debt at December 31, 2008 comprised
primarily of convertible debentures and capital leases. Our
7.7% notes due April 2009 are classified as long-term as we
intend to refinance these notes through a drawdown on our
revolving credit agreement. Our consolidated debt had a weighted
average interest rate of 6.70% and 7.09% at December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively. Approximately 87% and 89% of our
total debt had a fixed interest rate at December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively.
88
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The aggregate maturities of our debt for the five years
subsequent to December 31, 2008 (in thousands) was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
27,104
|
|
2010
|
|
|
45,376
|
|
2011
|
|
|
192,458
|
|
2012
|
|
|
10,881
|
|
2013
|
|
|
91,229
|
|
2014 and thereafter
|
|
|
1,481,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,848,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank
Credit Facility
We entered into a five-year $450 million bank credit
facility in November 2006 with a syndicate of financial
institutions, comprised of a $300 million revolving credit
facility and a $150 million term loan facility, including a
sublimit of $175 million for letters of credit.
The bank credit facility matures in November 2011. As of
December 31, 2008, we have used the facility to support
$52.7 million of letters of credit. The credit facility
provides us with flexibility for working capital, if needed, and
is guaranteed by our domestic subsidiaries. The subsidiary
guaranty is a guaranty of payment of the outstanding amount of
the total lending commitment. It covers the term of the credit
facility, including extensions, and totaled a maximum potential
amount of $52.7 million at December 31, 2008. The
credit facility contains certain financial covenants, including
a minimum interest coverage ratio, a maximum leverage ratio,
maximum capital expenditure limitations, and certain cash
distribution and share repurchase restrictions. We pay a
quarterly fee on the unused commitment, which ranges from 0.25%
to 0.50%.
Debt
Issuances and Additions
During 2008, we entered into loan agreements with financial
institutions totaling $45.0 million. The proceeds, which
are included in mortgage notes and other debt, were used for
deposits related to certain transportation vehicles.
Additionally we drew $54.3 million on our revolving credit
facility, the proceeds of which were used to pay our
6.50% Notes due 2008 and for general corporate purposes.
In April 2007, we completed a private offering of
$400.0 million aggregate principal unsecured senior notes,
consisting of $200.0 million aggregate principal amount of
6.75% Senior Notes due 2015 and $200.0 million
aggregate principal amount of 7.50% Senior Notes due 2027.
We are entitled to redeem the notes at any time by paying a
make-whole premium. The notes are subject to the provisions of
our Senior Indenture dated as of February 1, 1993, as
amended, which includes covenants limiting, among other things,
the creation of liens securing indebtedness and sale-leaseback
transactions. We used the net proceeds from the offering to fund
the closing of the tender offers for our 6.50% Notes due
2008 and 7.70% Notes due 2009, as further discussed below,
and for general corporate purposes. Under the terms of the
registration rights agreement entered into in connection with
the offerings of the notes, we filed a registration statement
with the SEC with respect to an offer to exchange the notes for
registered notes with substantially identical terms. The
registration statement was declared effective by the SEC and the
offering to exchange was completed in the third quarter of 2007.
In November 2006, in connection with the closing of the
Alderwoods acquisition, we issued $200.0 million of
privately placed debt securities, consisting of
$50.0 million of Floating Rate Series A Senior Notes
due October 2011 and $150.0 million of Floating Rate
Series B Notes due October 2011. Interest on these
privately placed debt securities accrues at the rate of
3-month
LIBOR plus 2.0% (3.43% at December 31, 2008) and is
payable quarterly in arrears.
89
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In October 2006, we completed a private offering of
$500.0 million aggregate principal unsecured senior notes,
consisting of $250.0 million aggregate principal of
7.375% Senior Notes due 2014 and $250.0 million
aggregate principal of 7.625% Senior Notes due 2018. We are
entitled to redeem the notes at any time by paying a make-whole
premium. The notes are subject to the provisions of our Senior
Indenture dated as of February 1, 1993, as amended, which
includes certain covenants limiting, among other things, the
creation of liens securing indebtedness and sale-leaseback
transactions. During the fourth quarter of 2006, we completed
the required registration statement and exchanged publicly held
registered notes for the unregistered notes.
Debt
Extinguishments and Reductions
Subsequent to December 31, 2008, we purchased
$7.3 million aggregate principal amount of our
6.75% Notes due 2015 and $2.0 million aggregate
principal amount of our 7.00% Notes dues 2017 on the open
market. As a result of these transactions, we will recognize an
extinguishment gain of $1.6 million in our consolidated
statement of operations in the first quarter of 2009.
In the fourth quarter of 2008, we repaid $54.3 million of
amounts drawn on our revolving credit facility. In the first
quarter of 2008, we repaid $45.2 million aggregate
principal amount of our 6.50% Notes due 2008. There was no
gain or loss recognized as a result of this repayment.
In the fourth quarter of 2007, we purchased $13.5 million
aggregate principal amount of our 6.875% Notes due 2007. In
addition to this repurchase, we also prepaid $50 million of
our Series A Senior Notes due 2011. As a result of this
transaction, we recognized a loss of $0.5 million recorded
in Loss on early extinguishment of debt in our
consolidated statement of operations, which represents the
write-off of unamortized deferred loan costs of
$0.5 million.
In the second quarter of 2007, we purchased $149.8 million
aggregate principal amount of our 6.50% Notes due 2008 and
$173.8 million aggregate principal amount of our
7.70% Notes due 2009 in a tender offer. In connection with
the repurchase of the notes, we recognized a Loss on early
extinguishment of debt of approximately $12.1 million,
which represents the write-off of unamortized deferred loan
costs of $1.1 million, a $1.0 million loss on a
related interest rate hedge, and $10.0 million in premiums
paid to extinguish the debt.
In the first quarter of 2007, we repaid $100.0 million
aggregate principal amount of our term loan. As a result of this
transaction, we recognized a loss of $2.4 million recorded
in Loss on early extinguishment of debt in our
consolidated statement of operations, which represents the
write-off of unamortized deferred loan costs of
$1.7 million and a $0.7 million premium to early
extinguish the debt.
In the fourth quarter of 2006, we purchased $139.0 million
aggregate principal amount of our outstanding 7.70% Notes
due 2009 in a tender offer. As a result of this transaction, we
recognized a loss of $17.5 million recorded in Loss on
early extinguishment of debt, in our consolidated statement
of operations. Also in the fourth quarter of 2006, we redeemed
$11.3 million aggregate principal amount of our debentures
associated with the acquisitions of various locations. These
transactions resulted in no recognized gain or loss.
During the second quarter of 2006, our 7.2% Notes due 2006
matured, and we made a payment consisting of $10.7 million
in principal and $0.4 million in interest to the
debtholders and redeemed $1.0 million aggregate principal
amount of our debentures associated with the acquisition of
various locations. These transactions resulted in no recognized
gain or loss.
Capital
Leases
In 2008 and 2007, we acquired $27.5 million and
$31.7 million, respectively, of transportation equipment
using capital leases. In 2006, we acquired $126.4 million
of transportation equipment under capital leases, of which
$102.3 million had been classified as operating leases in
prior periods. See additional information regarding these leases
in Note 12.
90
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Additional
Debt Disclosures
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, we had deposited
$23.8 million and $23.7 million, respectively, in
restricted, interest-bearing accounts that were pledged as
collateral for various credit instruments and commercial
commitments. Our restricted cash is included in Deferred
charges and other assets in our consolidated balance sheet.
Unamortized pricing discounts, totaling $4.6 million and
$5.3 million at December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, primarily relate to our September 2002 exchange
offering of the 7.7% notes due April 2009.
We had assets of approximately $38.1 million and
$4.8 million pledged as collateral for the mortgage notes
and other debt at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Cash interest payments for the three years ended December 31
were as follows, in thousands:
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
131,844
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
140,298
|
|
2006
|
|
$
|
104,789
|
|
Cash interest payments in 2006 include $6.4 million of
bridge financing costs related to the Alderwoods acquisition.
Cash interest payments forecasted as of December 31, 2008
for the five years subsequent to December 31, 2008 are as
follows, in thousands:
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
121,138
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
120,691
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
121,045
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
112,924
|
|
2013
|
|
$
|
108,848
|
|
2014 and thereafter
|
|
$
|
464,439
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Credit
Risk and Fair Value of Financial Instruments
|
Fair
Value Estimates
The fair value estimates of the following financial instruments
have been determined using available market information and
appropriate valuation methodologies. The carrying values of cash
and cash equivalents, trade receivables, and trade payables
approximate the fair values of those instruments due to the
short-term nature of the instruments. The fair values of
receivables on preneed funeral contracts and cemetery contracts
are impracticable to estimate because of the lack of a trading
market and the diverse number of individual contracts with
varying terms.
91
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fair value of our debt instruments at December 31 was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
6.5% notes due 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,209
|
|
7.7% notes due 2009
|
|
|
27,869
|
|
|
|
28,444
|
|
7.875% debentures due 2013
|
|
|
49,441
|
|
|
|
55,071
|
|
7.375% senior notes due 2014
|
|
|
215,000
|
|
|
|
253,750
|
|
6.75% notes due 2015
|
|
|
154,500
|
|
|
|
196,500
|
|
6.75% notes due 2016
|
|
|
190,000
|
|
|
|
239,375
|
|
7.0% notes due 2017
|
|
|
234,000
|
|
|
|
288,750
|
|
7.625% senior notes due 2018
|
|
|
194,750
|
|
|
|
251,250
|
|
7.5% notes due 2027
|
|
|
129,750
|
|
|
|
185,000
|
|
Series B senior notes due 2011
|
|
|
106,222
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Mortgage notes and other debt, maturities through 2050
|
|
|
43,674
|
|
|
|
19,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value of debt instruments
|
|
$
|
1,345,206
|
|
|
$
|
1,713,266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair values of our long-term, fixed rate securities, except
the Series B senior notes due 2011 were estimated using
market prices for those securities and they, therefore, fall
within Level 1 of the SFAS 157 hierarchy discussed in
Note 3. The Series B Senior Notes due 2011 and the
mortgage and other debt fall within Level 3 of the
SFAS 157 hierarchy. The fair value of these instruments has
been estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based on our
incremental borrowing rate for similar borrowing arrangements.
Credit
Risk Exposure
Our cash deposits, some of which exceed insured limits, are
distributed among various market and national banks in the
jurisdictions in which we operate. In addition, we regularly
invest excess cash in financial instruments which are not
insured, such as money-market funds and Eurodollar time
deposits, that are offered by a variety of reputable financial
institutions and commercial paper that is offered by
corporations with quality credit ratings. We believe that the
credit risk associated with such instruments is minimal.
We grant credit to customers in the normal course of business.
The credit risk associated with our funeral, cemetery, and
preneed funeral and preneed cemetery receivables due from
customers is generally considered minimal because of the
diversification of the customers served. Furthermore, bad debts
have not been significant relative to the volume of deferred
revenues. Customer payments on preneed funeral or preneed
cemetery contracts that are either placed into state-regulated
trusts or used to pay premiums on life insurance contracts
generally do not subject us to collection risk. Insurance-funded
contracts are subject to supervision by state insurance
departments and are protected in the majority of states by
insurance guaranty acts.
|
|
12.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Leases
Our leases principally relate to funeral home facilities and
transportation equipment. The majority of our lease arrangements
contain options to (i) purchase the property at fair value
on the exercise date, (ii) purchase the property for a
value determined at the inception of the leases, or
(iii) renew for the fair rental value at the end of the
primary lease term. Rental expense for operating leases was
$26.9 million, $30.1 million, and $24.5 million
for the years
92
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively. As
of December 31, 2008, future minimum lease payments for
non-cancelable operating and capital leases exceeding one year
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
9,300
|
|
|
$
|
27,510
|
|
2010
|
|
|
7,522
|
|
|
|
45,702
|
|
2011
|
|
|
5,982
|
|
|
|
13,740
|
|
2012
|
|
|
5,615
|
|
|
|
10,738
|
|
2013
|
|
|
5,284
|
|
|
|
7,872
|
|
2014 and thereafter
|
|
|
49,214
|
|
|
|
25,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
82,917
|
|
|
$
|
130,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Interest on capital leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,900
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total principal payable on capital leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
109,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management,
Consulting, and Non-Competition Agreements
We have entered into management, employment, consulting, and
non-competition agreements, generally for five to ten years,
with certain officers and employees and former owners of
businesses that we acquired. At December 31, 2008, the
maximum estimated future cash commitment under agreements with
remaining commitment terms, and with original terms of more than
one year, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment
|
|
|
Consulting
|
|
|
Non-Competition
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
1,876
|
|
|
$
|
1,042
|
|
|
$
|
2,694
|
|
|
$
|
5,612
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1,405
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
1,727
|
|
|
|
3,578
|
|
2011
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
1,329
|
|
|
|
1,982
|
|
2012
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
1,072
|
|
|
|
1,718
|
|
2013
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
880
|
|
2014 and thereafter
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
1,987
|
|
|
|
2,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,121
|
|
|
$
|
1,921
|
|
|
$
|
9,407
|
|
|
$
|
16,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Representations
and Warranties
As of December 31, 2008, we have contingent obligations of
$31.9 million (of which $23.5 million is reflected in
our financial statements as a liability) resulting from our
previous international asset sales and joint venture
transactions. In some cases, we have agreed to guarantee certain
representations and warranties made in such disposition
transactions with letters of credit or interest-bearing cash
investments. We have interest-bearing cash investments of
$23.2 million included in Deferred charges and other
assets collateralizing certain of these contingent
obligations. We believe it is remote that we will be required to
fund to third parties claims against these representations and
warranties above the carrying value of the liability.
In 2004, we disposed of our funeral operations in France to a
newly formed,
third-party
company. As a result of this sale, we recognized certain
Euro-denominated contractual obligations related to
representations, warranties,
93
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
and other indemnifications. The remaining obligations related to
these indemnifications at December 31, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Potential
|
|
|
Value as of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Future
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Time Limit
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Litigation provision
|
|
Until entire resolution of
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
13,759
|
|
|
|
(i) the relevant claims or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) settlement of the claim by the purchaser at the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
request of the vendor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VAT taxes
|
|
January 31, 2009
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
5,075
|
|
Other
|
|
Until entire resolution of (i) the relevant claims or
|
|
|
(1
|
)(2)
|
|
|
3,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) settlement of the claim by the purchaser at the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
request of the vendor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Deductible of majority equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
owner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,429
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The potential maximum exposure for these items combined is
60.0 million or $84.6 million at
December 31, 2008. |
(2) |
|
Includes 2.0 million or $2.8 million of social
risks that become statute barred in the second quarter of 2009. |
Insurance
Loss Reserves
We purchase comprehensive general liability, morticians and
cemetery professional liability, automobile liability, and
workers compensation insurance coverage structured with
high deductibles. The high-deductible insurance program means we
are primarily self-insured for claims and associated costs and
losses covered by these policies. As of December 31, 2008
and 2007, we have self-insurance reserves of $63.6 million
and $69.9 million, respectively.
Litigation
We are a party to various litigation matters, investigations,
and proceedings. For each of our outstanding legal matters, we
evaluate the merits of the case, our exposure to the matter,
possible legal or settlement strategies, and the likelihood of
an unfavorable outcome. We intend to defend ourselves in the
lawsuits described herein; however, if we determine that an
unfavorable outcome is probable and can be reasonably estimated,
we establish the necessary accruals. We hold certain insurance
policies that may reduce cash outflows with respect to an
adverse outcome of certain of these litigation matters. We
accrue such insurance recoveries when they become probable of
being paid and can be reasonably estimated.
Conley Investment Counsel v. Service Corporation
International, et al; Civil Action 04-MD-1609; In the United
States District Court for the Southern District of Texas,
Houston Division (the 2003 Securities Lawsuit). The
2003 Securities Lawsuit resulted from the transfer and
consolidation by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
of three lawsuits Edgar Neufeld v. Service
Corporation International, et al; Cause
No. CV-S-03-1561-HDM-PAL;
In the United States District Court for the District of Nevada;
and Rujira Srisythemp v. Service Corporation
International, et. Al .; Cause
No. CV-S-03-1392-LDG-LRL;
In the United States District Court for the District of Nevada;
and Joshua Ackerman v. Service Corporation
International, et. Al. ; Cause
No. 04-CV-20114;
In the United States District Court for the Southern District of
Florida. The 2003 Securities Lawsuit names as defendants SCI and
several of SCIs current and former executive officers or
directors. The 2003 Securities Lawsuit is a purported class
action alleging that the defendants failed to disclose the
unlawful
94
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
treatment of human remains and burial sites at two cemeteries in
Fort Lauderdale and West Palm Beach, Florida. No discovery
has occurred, and we cannot quantify our ultimate liability, if
any, for the payment of damages.
Burial Practices Claims. We are named as a
defendant in various lawsuits alleging improper burial practices
at certain of our cemetery locations. These lawsuits include the
Valls and Garcia lawsuits described in the
following paragraphs.
Maria Valls, Pedro Valls, and Roberto Valls, on behalf of
themselves and all other similarly situated v. SCI Funeral
Services of Florida, Inc. d/b/a Memorial Plan a/k/a Flagler
Memorial Park, John Does and Jane Does; Case
No. 23693CA08; In the Circuit Court of the
11th Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida
(Valls Lawsuit). The Valls Lawsuit was filed
December 5, 2005, and named a subsidiary of SCI as a
defendant. Plaintiffs have requested that the court certify this
matter as a class action. The plaintiffs allege the defendants
improperly handled remains, did not keep adequate records of
interments, and engaged in various other improprieties in
connection with the operation of the cemetery. Although the
plaintiffs seek to certify as a class all family members of
persons buried at the cemetery, the court has dismissed
plaintiffs class action allegations on two occasions;
however, the dismissals were without prejudice. Plaintiffs filed
a third amended complaint and we again moved to dismiss the
class action allegations. The court dismissed the class
allegations with prejudice, and the plaintiffs have appealed the
ruling. The plaintiffs are seeking monetary damages and have
reserved the right to seek leave from the court to claim
punitive damages. The plaintiffs are also seeking injunctive
relief and we cannot quantify our ultimate liability, if any,
for the payment of any damages.
Reyvis Garcia and Alicia Garcia v. Alderwoods Group,
Inc., Osiris Holding of Florida, Inc, a Florida corporation,
d/b/a Graceland Memorial Park South, f/k/a Paradise Memorial
Gardens, Inc., was filed in December 2004, in the Circuit
Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade
County, Florida, Case
No.: 04-25646
CA 32. Plaintiffs are the son and sister of the decedent, Eloisa
Garcia, who was buried at Graceland Memorial Park South in March
1986, when the cemetery was owned by Paradise Memorial Gardens,
Inc. Initially, the suit sought damages on the individual claims
of the plaintiffs relating to the burial of Eloisa Garcia.
Plaintiffs claimed that due to poor record keeping, spacing
issues and maps, and the fact that the family could not afford
to purchase a marker for the grave, the burial location of the
decedent could not be readily located. Subsequently, the
decedents grave was located and verified. In July 2006,
plaintiffs amended their complaint, seeking to certify a class
of all persons buried at this cemetery whose burial sites cannot
be located, claiming that this was due to poor record keeping,
maps, and surveys at the cemetery. Plaintiffs subsequently filed
a third amended class action complaint and added two additional
named plaintiffs. The plaintiffs are seeking unspecified
monetary damages, as well as equitable and injunctive relief. No
class has been certified in this matter. Since the action is in
its preliminary stages, we cannot quantify our ultimate
liability, if any, for the payment of any damages.
Funeral Regulations Lawsuits. We are named as
a defendant in various lawsuits alleging violations of federal
and state funeral related regulations
and/or
statutes, including the Baudino and Sanchez
lawsuits described in the following paragraphs.
Mary Louise Baudino, et al. v. Service Corporation
International, et al. was filed in November 2004 in Los
Angeles County Superior Court; Case No. BC324007
(Baudino Lawsuit). The Baudino Lawsuit was initially
filed as a putative nationwide class action brought on behalf of
all persons, entities, and organizations who purchased funeral
services from SCI. Plaintiffs alleged that funeral related
regulations
and/or
statutes (Rules) required us to disclose our markups
on all items obtained from
third-parties
in connection with funeral service contracts and that the
failure to make certain disclosures of markups resulted in
breach of contract and other legal claims. The plaintiffs sought
to recover an unspecified amount of monetary damages as well as
attorneys fees, costs, and interest. We denied all of the
claims and denied that the plaintiffs had standing to sue for
violations of the Rules. On September 15, 2006, the trial
court granted our motion for summary judgment on the merits.
Plaintiffs appealed the summary judgment ruling. The appellate
court affirmed the summary judgment in December 2008. In
February 2009, the time frame for plaintiffs to appeal expired
and the case ended.
95
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Richard Sanchez et al v. Alderwoods Group, Inc.
et al was filed in February 2005 in the Superior Court
of the State of California, for the County of Los Angeles,
Central District; Case No. BC328962. Plaintiffs seek to
certify a nationwide class on behalf of all consumers who
purchased funeral goods and services from Alderwoods. Plaintiffs
allege in essence that the Federal Trade Commissions
Funeral Rule requires Alderwoods to disclose its markups on all
items obtained from third-parties in connection with funeral
service contracts. Plaintiffs allege further that Alderwoods has
failed to make such disclosures. Plaintiffs seek to recover an
unspecified amount of monetary damages, attorneys fees,
costs, and unspecified injunctive and declaratory
relief. This case is substantially similar to the Baudino
Lawsuit, and we expect that the outcome of this case will be
governed by the law applied in the Baudino Lawsuit.
Antitrust Claims. We are named as a defendant
in two related class action antitrust cases filed in 2005. The
first case is Cause No 4:05-CV-03394; Funeral Consumers
Alliance, Inc. v. Service Corporation International, et al.
; in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of Texas Houston (Funeral Consumers
Case). This is a purported class action on behalf of
casket consumers throughout the United States alleging that we
and several other companies involved in the funeral industry
violated federal antitrust laws and state consumer laws by
engaging in various anti-competitive conduct associated with the
sale of caskets.
The second case is Cause
No. 4:05-CV-03399;
Pioneer Valley Casket, et al. v. Service Corporation
International, et al.; in the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas Houston Division
(Pioneer Valley Case). This lawsuit makes the same
allegations as the Funeral Consumers Case and is also brought
against several other companies involved in the funeral
industry. Unlike the Funeral Consumers Case, the Pioneer Case is
a purported class action on behalf of all independent casket
distributors that are in the business or were in the business
any time between July 18, 2001 to the present.
The Funeral Consumers Case and the Pioneer Valley Case seek
injunctions, monetary damages, and treble damages. The
plaintiffs in the Funeral Consumers Case filed an expert report
indicating that the damages sought from all defendants range
from approximately $950 million to $1.5 billion,
before trebling. Additionally, the plaintiffs in the Pioneer
Valley Case filed an expert report indicating that the damages
sought from all defendants would be approximately
$99 million, before trebling. We deny that we engaged in
anticompetitive practices related to our casket sales and intend
to vigorously contest these claims and plaintiffs damages
reports. In both cases, we have filed reports of our experts,
which vigorously dispute the validity of the plaintiffs
damages theories and calculations. We cannot quantify our
ultimate liability, if any, for the payment of damages.
In November 2008, the Magistrate Judge issued recommendations
that motions for class certification be denied in both the
Funeral Consumers Case and the Pioneer Valley Case. Plaintiffs
have filed objections to the recommendations.
In addition to the Funeral Consumers Case and the Pioneer Valley
Case, we received Civil Investigative Demands, dated August 2005
and February 2006, from the Attorney General of Maryland on
behalf of itself and other state attorneys general, who have
commenced an investigation of alleged anticompetitive practices
in the funeral industry. We have also received similar Civil
Investigative Demands from the Attorneys General of Florida and
Connecticut.
Wage and Hour Claims. We are named a defendant
in various lawsuits alleging violations of federal and state
laws regulating wage and hour overtime pay, including the Prise,
Bryant, Bryant, Stickle, and Welch lawsuits described in the
following paragraphs.
Prise, et al., v. Alderwoods Group, Inc., and Service
Corporation International; Cause
No. 06-164;
in the United States District Court for the Western District of
Pennsylvania (the Wage and Hour Lawsuit). The Wage
and Hour Lawsuit was filed by two former Alderwoods
(Pennsylvania), Inc., employees in December 2006 and purports to
have been brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act
(FLSA) on behalf of all Alderwoods and SCI
affiliated employees who performed work for which they were not
fully compensated, including work for which
96
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
overtime pay was owed. The court has conditionally certified a
class of claims as to certain job positions for Alderwoods
employees.
Plaintiffs allege causes of action for violations of the FLSA,
failure to maintain proper records, breach of contract,
violations of state wage and hour laws, unjust enrichment, fraud
and deceit, quantum meruit, negligent misrepresentation, and
negligence. Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief, unpaid wages,
liquidated, compensatory, consequential and punitive damages,
attorneys fees and costs, and pre- and post-judgment
interest. We cannot quantify our ultimate liability, if any, in
this lawsuit.
Bryant, et al. v. Alderwoods Group, Inc., Service
Corporation International, et al.;
Case No. 3:07-CV-5696-SI;
in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
California. This lawsuit was filed on November 8, 2007
against SCI and various subsidiaries and individuals. It too is
related to the Wage and Hour Lawsuit, raising similar claims and
brought by the same attorneys. This lawsuit has been transferred
to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of
Pennsylvania and is now Case
No. 08-CV-00891-JFC.
We cannot quantify our ultimate liability, if any, in this
lawsuit.
Bryant, et al. v. Service Corporation International, et al.;
Case
No. RG-07359593;
and Helm, et al. v. AWGI & SCI; Case
No. RG-07359602;
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of
Almeda. These cases were filed on December 5, 2007 by
counsel for plaintiffs in the Wage and Hour Lawsuit. These cases
assert state law claims like those previously dismissed in the
Wage and Hour Lawsuit. These cases were removed to federal court
in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
California, San Francisco/Oakland Division. The Bryant case
is now Case
No. 3:08-CV-01190-SI
and the Helm case is now Case
No. 2:-CV-01184-SI.
We cannot quantify our ultimate liability, if any, in this
lawsuit.
Stickle, et al. v. Service Corporation International, et
al.; Case
No. 08-CV-83;
In the U.S. District Court for Arizona, Phoenix Division.
Counsel for plaintiffs in the Wage and Hour Lawsuit filed this
case on January 17, 2008, against SCI and various related
entities and individuals asserting FLSA and other ancillary
claims based on the alleged failure to pay for overtime.
Plaintiffs seek the same class notice to SCI and related
entities that were rejected by the Court in the Wage and Hour
Lawsuit. We cannot quantify our ultimate liability, if any, in
this lawsuit.
Ordaz, et al. v. rose Hills Mortuary, L.P., et al.; Case
No. BC 386500; In the Superior Court of the State of
California, for the County of Los Angeles. This case was filed
on February 28, 2008 as a purported class action against
our Rose Hills location asserting claims based on various
violations of California law related to the payment of wages and
work hours. We settled this case in January 2009.
Shauna Welch v. California Cemetery & Funeral
Services, LLC; Case No. BC 396793; In the Superior
Court of the State of California, for the County of Los Angeles.
In August 2008, the plaintiff filed a class action on behalf of
employees of a subsidiary in California for alleged violations
of the California Labor Code and the Business &
Professions Code. The plaintiff specifically alleges that she
and the putative class are unable to negotiate their paychecks
without paying a fee
and/or
without being subject to a waiting period since paychecks are
issued from an out-of-state bank. We cannot quantify our
ultimate liability, if any, in this lawsuit.
The ultimate outcome of the matters described above cannot be
determined at this time. We intend to aggressively defend all of
the above lawsuits; however, an adverse decision in one or more
of such matters could have a material adverse effect on us, our
financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
(All
shares reported in whole numbers)
Share
Authorization
We are authorized to issue 1,000,000 shares of preferred
stock, $1 per share par value. No preferred shares were issued
as of December 31, 2008 or 2007. At December 31, 2008
and 2007, 500,000,000 common shares of
97
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
$1 par value were authorized. We had 249,472,075 and
262,858,169 shares issued and outstanding, net of 481,000
and 1,961,300 shares held in treasury at par at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income
Our components of Accumulated other comprehensive income
at December 31 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Gains and
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
(Loss) Income
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
70,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,499
|
|
Activity in 2006
|
|
|
1,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,731
|
)
|
|
|
(2,692
|
)
|
Adjustment upon initial adoption of SFAS 158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(623
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(623
|
)
|
Increase in net unrealized gains associated with
available-for-sale securities of the trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,751
|
|
|
|
37,751
|
|
Reclassification of net unrealized gains activity attributable
to the deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in
trust and care trusts corpus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,751
|
)
|
|
|
(37,751
|
)
|
Reclassification for translation adjustment realized in net gain
|
|
|
5,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
76,652
|
|
|
$
|
(623
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,731
|
)
|
|
$
|
72,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity in 2007
|
|
|
92,003
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
(5,699
|
)
|
|
|
86,927
|
|
Reduction in net unrealized gains associated with
available-for-sale securities of the trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105,438
|
)
|
|
|
(105,438
|
)
|
Reclassification of net unrealized losses activity attributable
to the deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in
trust and care trusts corpus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,438
|
|
|
|
105,438
|
|
Reclassification for losses on available-for-sale securities
realized in net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,430
|
|
|
|
9,430
|
|
Reclassification for translation adjustment realized in net loss
|
|
|
(16,065
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,065
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
152,590
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
152,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Gains and
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
(Loss) Income
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Activity in 2008
|
|
|
(115,941
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(115,941
|
)
|
Reduction in net unrealized gains associated with
available-for-sale securities of the trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(605,355
|
)
|
|
|
(605,355
|
)
|
Reclassification of unrealized losses activity attributable to
the deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust
and care trusts corpus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
605,355
|
|
|
|
605,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
36,649
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reclassification for losses on available-for-sale securities
adjustment of $9.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 primarily relates to the sale of a
consolidated subsidiary and is included in Income from
discontinued operations on our consolidated statement of
operations. The reclassification for translation adjustment of
$16.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007
relates to the sale of our former equity investment in France
and is included in Equity in earnings of unconsolidated
subsidiaries on our consolidated statement of operations.
The reclassification adjustment of $5.1 million for the
year ended December 31, 2006 primarily relates to the sale
of our operations in Singapore. The $3.7 million unrealized
loss on investment securities is related to investment
securities held by a consolidated subsidiary.
The assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated
into U.S. dollars using the current exchange rate. The
U.S. dollar amount that arises from such translation, as
well as exchange gains and losses on intercompany balances of a
long-term investment nature, are included in the cumulative
currency translation adjustments in Accumulated other
comprehensive income. Income taxes are generally not
provided for foreign currency translation.
Share
Repurchase Program
Subject to market conditions, normal trading restrictions, and
limitations in our debt covenants, we may make purchases in the
open market or through privately negotiated transactions under
our share repurchase program. During 2008, we repurchased
17.7 million shares of common stock at an aggregate cost of
$142.2 million including commissions, or an average cost
per share of $8.03. During 2007, we repurchased
38.5 million shares of common stock at an aggregate cost of
$505.1 million. During 2006, we repurchased
3.4 million shares of common stock at an aggregate cost of
$27.9 million. In November 2008, our Board of Directors
approved an increase in our share repurchase program authorizing
the investment of up to an additional $120 million to
repurchase our common stock. The remaining dollar value of
shares authorized to be purchased under the share repurchase
program was $123.4 million at December 31, 2008.
Cash
Dividends
On November 12, 2008, our Board of Directors approved a
cash dividend of $.04 per common share. At December 31,
2008, this dividend totaling $10.0 million was recorded in
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities and Capital
in Excess of Par Value in our consolidated balance
sheet. Subsequent to December 31, 2008, this dividend was
paid. We paid $41.5 million, $34.6 million, and
$29.4 million in cash dividends in 2008, 2007, and 2006,
respectively. On February 11, 2009, our Board of Directors
approved a cash dividend of $.04 per common share.
99
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
14.
|
Share-Based
Compensation
|
Stock
Benefit Plans
We maintain benefit plans whereby shares of our common stock may
be issued pursuant to the exercise of stock options or
restricted stock granted to officers and key employees. Our
Amended 1996 Incentive Plan reserves 34,000,000 shares of
common stock for outstanding and future awards of stock options,
restricted stock, and other stock based awards to officers and
key employees.
Our benefit plans allow for options to be granted as either
non-qualified or incentive stock options. The options
historically have been granted annually, or upon hire, as
approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors. The options are granted with an exercise price equal
to the market price of our common stock on the date the grant,
as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors. The options are generally exercisable at a rate of
331/3%
each year unless alternative vesting methods are approved by the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Restricted
stock awards are generally expensed to income ratably over the
period during which the restrictions lapse. At December 31,
2008 and 2007, 12,068,455 and 13,358,979 shares,
respectively, were reserved for future option and restricted
stock grants under our stock benefit plans.
We utilize the Black-Scholes option valuation model for
estimating the fair value of our stock options. This model
allows the use of a range of assumptions related to volatility,
the risk-free interest rate, the expected life, and the dividend
yield. The expected volatility utilized in the valuation model
is based on implied volatilities from traded options on our
stock and the historical volatility of our stock price. The
dividend yield and expected holding period are based on
historical experience and managements estimate of future
events. The risk-free interest rate is derived from the
U.S. Treasury yield curve based on the expected life of the
option in effect at the time of grant. The fair values of our
stock options are calculated using the following weighted
average assumptions, based on the methods described above for
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
Assumptions
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
45.9
|
%
|
|
|
38.9
|
%
|
|
|
37.9
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
Expected holding period
|
|
|
5.7 years
|
|
|
|
5.9 years
|
|
|
|
5.6 years
|
|
The following table shows a summary of information with respect
to stock option and restricted share compensation for 2008,
2007, and 2006, as included in our consolidated statement of
operations for those respective periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Total pretax employee share-based compensation expense included
in net income
|
|
$
|
9,261
|
|
|
$
|
8,787
|
|
|
$
|
7,035
|
|
Income tax benefit related to share-based compensation included
in net income
|
|
$
|
3,732
|
|
|
$
|
3,401
|
|
|
$
|
3,198
|
|
Stock
Options
The following table sets forth stock option activity for the
year ended December 31, 2008:
(Shares reported in whole numbers and not in thousands)
100
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
13,568,445
|
|
|
$
|
6.25
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,434,143
|
|
|
$
|
11.58
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(3,944,385
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.76
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(138,901
|
)
|
|
$
|
10.63
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(57,413
|
)
|
|
$
|
12.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
10,861,889
|
|
|
$
|
7.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
7,639,216
|
|
|
$
|
6.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008, the aggregate intrinsic value for
stock options outstanding and exercisable was $1.7 million
and $1.7 million, respectively. Set forth below is certain
information related to stock options outstanding and exercisable
at December 31, 2008:
(Shares reported in whole numbers and not in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Exercisable at
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Range of Exercise Price
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
$0.00 4.00
|
|
|
932,000
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
3.48
|
|
|
|
932,000
|
|
|
$
|
3.48
|
|
4.01 6.00
|
|
|
3,405,000
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
$
|
4.97
|
|
|
|
3,405,000
|
|
|
$
|
4.97
|
|
6.01 9.00
|
|
|
2,805,686
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
$
|
7.59
|
|
|
|
2,312,625
|
|
|
$
|
7.46
|
|
9.01 15.00
|
|
|
3,464,043
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
$
|
11.16
|
|
|
|
734,431
|
|
|
$
|
10.87
|
|
15.01 38.00
|
|
|
255,160
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
16.84
|
|
|
|
255,160
|
|
|
$
|
16.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.00 38.00
|
|
|
10,861,889
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
7.77
|
|
|
|
7,639,216
|
|
|
$
|
6.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other information pertaining to option activity during the years
ended December 31 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Weighted average grant-date fair value of stock options granted
(valued using Black-Scholes model)
|
|
$
|
4.78
|
|
|
$
|
4.35
|
|
|
$
|
3.11
|
|
Total fair value of stock options vested (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
5,627
|
|
|
$
|
3,965
|
|
|
$
|
1,987
|
|
Total intrinsic value of stock options exercised (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
16,559
|
|
|
$
|
47,800
|
|
|
$
|
6,448
|
|
We calculated our historical pool of windfall tax benefits by
comparing the book expense for individual stock grants and the
related tax deduction for options granted after January 1,
1995. Adjustments were made to exclude windfall tax benefits
that were not realized due to our net operating loss position
prior to December 31, 2006. Upon completion of this
calculation, we determined an additional paid in capital pool of
$2.1 million.
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, cash
received from the exercise of stock options was
$14.8 million, $52.9 million, and $5.9 million,
respectively. We recognized windfall tax deduction of
$17.9 million, $49.4 million, and $5.7 million in
excess of previously recorded tax benefits, based on the option
value at the time of grant for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively. Pursuant to SFAS 123(R)
Share-Based Payment, the additional tax
benefit associated with the windfall is not recognized until the
deduction reduces taxes payable. We recognized compensation cost
of $6.2 million, $5.4 million, and $4.0 million
related to stock options for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively. As of December 31,
2008, the unrecognized compensation expense related to stock
options of $8.2 million is expected to be recognized over a
weighted average period of 1.9 years.
101
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Restricted
Shares
Restricted share activity was as follows:
(Shares reported in whole numbers)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Nonvested restricted shares at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
674,576
|
|
|
$
|
9.04
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
290,000
|
|
|
$
|
11.61
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(9,034
|
)
|
|
$
|
10.51
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(363,601
|
)
|
|
$
|
8.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested restricted shares at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
591,941
|
|
|
$
|
10.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair market value of our restricted stock, as determined on
the grant date, is being amortized and charged to income (with
an offsetting credit to Capital in excess of par value)
generally over the average period during which the restrictions
lapse. At December 31, 2008, unrecognized compensation
expense of $3.5 million related to restricted shares, which
is recorded in Capital in excess of par value on the
balance sheet, is expected to be recognized over a weighted
average period of 1.0 years. We recognized compensation
cost of $3.0 million, $3.4 million, and
$3.0 million in the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007, and 2006, respectively, related to our restricted shares.
We currently have a supplemental retirement plan for certain
current and former key employees (SERP), a supplemental
retirement plan for officers and certain key employees (Senior
SERP), a retirement plan for certain non-employee directors
(Directors Plan), a Retirement Plan for Rose Hills
Trustees, and a Rose Hills Supplemental Retirement Plan (Rose
Hills SERP) (collectively, the Plans). We also
provide a 401(k) employee savings plan. We terminated the
Employee Retirement Plan of Rose Hills in 2008 and a
non-contributory defined benefit pension plan covering certain
employees in the United States (U.S. Pension Plan) in 2007.
Effective January 1, 2001, we curtailed our
U.S. Pension Plan, SERP, Senior SERP, and Directors
Plan. Additionally, the plans assumed in connection with the
Alderwoods acquisition are frozen. Because the Plans are frozen,
the participants do not earn incremental benefits from
additional years of service, and we have not incurred any
additional service cost since December 31, 2000.
Retirement benefits under the SERP are based on years of service
and average monthly compensation, reduced by benefits under
Social Security. The Senior SERP provides retirement benefits
based on years of service and position. The Directors Plan
provides for an annual benefit to directors following
retirement, based on a vesting schedule.
The components of the Plans net periodic benefit cost for
the years ended December 31 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
2,590
|
|
|
$
|
6,559
|
|
|
$
|
7,348
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
(294
|
)
|
|
|
(5,483
|
)
|
|
|
(6,829
|
)
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
Recognized net actuarial (gain) loss
|
|
|
(2,512
|
)
|
|
|
3,052
|
|
|
|
2,961
|
|
Plan dissolution and other
|
|
|
1,968
|
|
|
|
11,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,752
|
|
|
$
|
15,472
|
|
|
$
|
3,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Plans funded status at December 31 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Change in Benefit Obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
104,207
|
|
|
$
|
150,124
|
|
Plan termination
|
|
|
(56,433
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
2,590
|
|
|
|
6,559
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
(568
|
)
|
|
|
11,558
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(16,845
|
)
|
|
|
(64,034
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
$
|
32,951
|
|
|
$
|
104,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Plan Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
67,104
|
|
|
$
|
84,686
|
|
Plan termination
|
|
|
(56,433
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
(294
|
)
|
|
|
5,483
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
6,468
|
|
|
|
41,894
|
|
Benefits paid, including expenses
|
|
|
(16,845
|
)
|
|
|
(64,959
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
67,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status of plan
|
|
$
|
(32,951
|
)
|
|
$
|
(37,103
|
)
|
Net amount recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
$
|
(32,951
|
)
|
|
$
|
(37,103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funding Summary:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligations
|
|
$
|
32,951
|
|
|
$
|
104,207
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
32,951
|
|
|
$
|
104,207
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
67,104
|
|
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued benefit liability
|
|
$
|
(32,951
|
)
|
|
$
|
(37,103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The retirement benefits under the Plans are unfunded obligations
of the Company. We have purchased various life insurance
policies on the participants in the Plans with the intent to use
the proceeds or any cash value buildup from such policies to
assist in meeting, at least to the extent of such assets, the
Plans funding requirements. The face value of these
insurance policies at December 31, 2008 and 2007 was
$75.1 million and $70.6 million, respectively, and the
cash surrender value was $51.7 million and
$47.7 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. No loans are outstanding against the policies, but
there are no restrictions in the policies regarding loans.
The Plans weighted-average assumptions used to determine
the benefit obligation and net benefit cost are as follows: we
base our discount rate used to compute future benefit
obligations using an analysis of expected future benefit
payments. The reasonableness of our discount rate is verified by
comparing the rate to the rate earned on high-quality fixed
income investments, such as the Moodys Aa index, plus
50 basis points. The assumed rate of return on plan assets
was not applicable as we recognize gains and losses on plan
assets during the year in which they occur. As all Plans are
curtailed, the assumed rate of compensation increase is zero.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Weighted average discount rate used to determine obligations
|
|
|
5.95
|
%
|
|
|
5.64
|
%
|
|
|
5.55
|
%
|
Discount rate used to determine net periodic pension cost
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
5.53
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
103
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Plans weighted-average asset allocations at
December 31, 2007 by asset category were as follows (there
are no assets at December 31, 2008 as the remaining plans
are unfunded obligations):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Fixed income investments
|
|
|
62
|
%
|
Equity securities(1)
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Equity securities do not include shares of our common stock at
December 31, 2007. |
Our Employee Retirement Plan of Rose Hills was terminated in
2008. In 2008, we made a contribution of $3.0 million to
purchase annuities for participants of this plan. To effect the
termination of the plan we settled all remaining liabilities in
the fourth quarter of 2008.
Our non-contributory, defined benefit pension plan covering
approximately 34% of our United States employees was terminated
in December 2007. The revaluation of projected benefit
obligation (PBO) on a plan termination basis resulted in an
additional PBO of $4.7 million. On the asset side, the fund
experienced a negative actual return in the fourth quarter of
2007 and paid expenses from the fund, the total of which was
$0.5 million. In 2007 we made a contribution of
$38.8 million to fully fund the plan bringing the value of
assets to $56.4 million prior to adjusting for benefits
paid and settlement of the obligation. To effect the termination
of the plan, we settled all remaining obligations in December
2007. Monthly annuities paid were $0.8 million for the
fourth quarter of 2007, lump sums paid were $14.4 million,
and the total annuity purchase for remaining obligations was
$41.2 million for a total of $56.4 million. Of this,
the lump sums paid and annuity purchases totaling
$55.6 million were considered settlements under
FAS 88. After all fourth quarter FAS 88 adjustments
were made, the outstanding balances of our PBO and accumulated
other comprehensive income related to the U.S. Pension Plan
are $0.
The following Plan benefit payments are expected to be paid:
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
3,666
|
|
2010
|
|
|
4,136
|
|
2011
|
|
|
3,806
|
|
2012
|
|
|
3,744
|
|
2013
|
|
|
3,667
|
|
Years 2014 through 2018
|
|
|
14,540
|
|
On December 31, 2006, we adopted FASB Statement
No. 158 Employers Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans. The
objective of the Statement is to improve financial reporting by
requiring an employer to recognize the funded status of a
benefit plan measured as the difference between plan
assets at fair value and the projected benefit
obligation in its statement of financial position.
SFAS 158 requires an employer to recognize as a component
of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the gains and losses
and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period
which were not recognized as components of net periodic benefit
costs pursuant to FASB Statement No. 87,
Employers Accounting for Pensions, or
No. 106, Employers Accounting for Postretirement
Benefits Other Than Pensions.
The Statement calls for measuring the defined benefit plan
assets and obligations as of the date of the employers
fiscal year-end statement of financial position. The requirement
to change the measurement date is effective for fiscal years
ending after December 15, 2008. All of our Plans have a
measurement date of December 31.
104
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We have an employee savings plan that qualifies under
section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code for the
exclusive benefit of our United States employees. Under the
plan, participating employees may contribute a portion of their
pretax
and/or after
tax income in accordance with specified guidelines up to a
maximum of 50%.
During 2008, we matched a percentage of the employee
contributions through contributions of cash. For the year, our
matching contribution was based upon the following:
|
|
|
Years of Vesting Service
|
|
Percentage of Deferred Compensation
|
|
0 5 years
|
|
75% of the first 6% of deferred compensation
|
6 10 years
|
|
100% of the first 6% of deferred compensation
|
11 or more years
|
|
125% of the first 6% of deferred compensation
|
During 2007 and 2006, we matched a percentage of the employee
contributions through contributions of cash. For each of the two
years, our matching contribution was based upon the following:
|
|
|
Years of Vesting Service
|
|
Percentage of Deferred Compensation
|
|
0 5 years
|
|
75% of the first 6% of deferred compensation
|
6 10 years
|
|
110% of the first 6% of deferred compensation
|
11 or more years
|
|
135% of the first 6% of deferred compensation
|
The amount of our matched contributions in 2008, 2007, and 2006
was $18.1 million, $17.0 million, and
$16.8 million, respectively.
Our operations are both product based and geographically based,
and the reportable operating segments presented below include
our funeral and cemetery operations. Our geographic areas
include United States, Canada, and Germany.
Alderwoods operating results are included in our full-year 2008
and 2007 results and since November 28, 2006 for the year
ended December 31, 2006. See Note 20 for pro-forma
presentation related to the Alderwoods acquisition.
Results from our funeral business in Singapore, which was sold
in the fourth quarter of 2006, are classified as discontinued
operations for all periods presented. We conduct both funeral
and cemetery operations in the United States and Canada and
funeral operations in Germany.
105
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Our reportable segment information is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
Segments
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,475,736
|
|
|
$
|
679,886
|
|
|
$
|
2,155,622
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,467
|
|
|
|
1,053
|
|
|
|
5,520
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
87,116
|
|
|
|
21,970
|
|
|
|
109,086
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
17,171
|
|
|
|
6,344
|
|
|
|
23,515
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
312,848
|
|
|
|
105,923
|
|
|
|
418,771
|
|
Amortization of cemetery property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,690
|
|
|
|
32,690
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
3,871,267
|
|
|
|
3,816,182
|
|
|
|
7,687,449
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
65,879
|
|
|
|
77,304
|
|
|
|
143,183
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,525,349
|
|
|
$
|
759,954
|
|
|
$
|
2,285,303
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
6,897
|
|
|
|
1,837
|
|
|
|
8,734
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
87,877
|
|
|
|
23,433
|
|
|
|
111,310
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
18,932
|
|
|
|
8,497
|
|
|
|
27,429
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
307,552
|
|
|
|
159,295
|
|
|
|
466,847
|
|
Amortization of cemetery property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,824
|
|
|
|
35,824
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
4,245,164
|
|
|
|
4,262,264
|
|
|
|
8,507,428
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
77,625
|
|
|
|
78,777
|
|
|
|
156,402
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,161,762
|
|
|
$
|
591,126
|
|
|
$
|
1,752,888
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
6,384
|
|
|
|
2,468
|
|
|
|
8,852
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
61,141
|
|
|
|
18,059
|
|
|
|
79,200
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
11,201
|
|
|
|
2,152
|
|
|
|
13,353
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
240,470
|
|
|
|
107,494
|
|
|
|
347,964
|
|
Amortization of cemetery property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,263
|
|
|
|
28,263
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
4,505,437
|
|
|
|
4,575,424
|
|
|
|
9,080,861
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
38,031
|
|
|
|
53,506
|
|
|
|
91,537
|
|
106
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table reconciles certain reportable segment
amounts to our corresponding consolidated amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
|
|
Segments
|
|
Corporate
|
|
Operations
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers
|
|
$
|
2,155,622
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,155,622
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
5,520
|
|
|
|
128,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,274
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
109,086
|
|
|
|
5,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,157
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
23,515
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,636
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
7,687,449
|
|
|
|
423,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,110,883
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
143,183
|
|
|
|
10,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154,101
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers
|
|
$
|
2,285,303
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,285,303
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
8,734
|
|
|
|
138,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,854
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
111,310
|
|
|
|
4,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,682
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
27,429
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,550
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
8,507,428
|
|
|
|
424,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,932,244
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
156,402
|
|
|
|
609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,011
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,752,888
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,752,888
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
8,852
|
|
|
|
114,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,399
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
79,200
|
|
|
|
4,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,010
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
13,353
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,474
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
9,080,861
|
|
|
|
275,160
|
|
|
|
373,368
|
|
|
|
9,729,389
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
91,537
|
|
|
|
5,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,527
|
|
107
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table reconciles gross profits from reportable
segments shown above to our consolidated income from continuing
operations before income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Gross profit from reportable segments
|
|
$
|
418,771
|
|
|
$
|
466,847
|
|
|
$
|
347,964
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(87,447
|
)
|
|
|
(135,753
|
)
|
|
|
(92,603
|
)
|
(Losses) gains on dispositions and impairment charges, net
|
|
|
(36,124
|
)
|
|
|
16,920
|
|
|
|
(58,683
|
)
|
Hurricane expense, net
|
|
|
(3,113
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income (expense)
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
(1,848
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
292,672
|
|
|
|
346,166
|
|
|
|
196,678
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(134,274
|
)
|
|
|
(146,854
|
)
|
|
|
(123,399
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
5,393
|
|
|
|
11,725
|
|
|
|
31,171
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,986
|
)
|
|
|
(17,532
|
)
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,607
|
|
|
|
1,052
|
|
Gain on redemption of securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,133
|
|
|
|
10,932
|
|
Other expense, net
|
|
|
(629
|
)
|
|
|
(3,804
|
)
|
|
|
(1,453
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
$
|
163,162
|
|
|
$
|
386,987
|
|
|
$
|
97,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our geographic area information was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
Canada
|
|
Germany
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,942,682
|
|
|
$
|
205,950
|
|
|
$
|
6,990
|
|
|
$
|
2,155,622
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
133,961
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,274
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
101,905
|
|
|
|
11,575
|
|
|
|
677
|
|
|
|
114,157
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
21,371
|
|
|
|
2,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,636
|
|
Amortization of cemetery property
|
|
|
28,317
|
|
|
|
4,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,690
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
244,954
|
|
|
|
47,395
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
292,672
|
|
(Losses) gains on dispositions and impairment charges, net
|
|
|
(32,750
|
)
|
|
|
(3,395
|
)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(36,124
|
)
|
Long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
4,434,810
|
|
|
$
|
318,409
|
|
|
$
|
2,753
|
|
|
$
|
4,755,972
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
2,079,088
|
|
|
$
|
199,137
|
|
|
$
|
7,078
|
|
|
$
|
2,285,303
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
146,526
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,854
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
102,339
|
|
|
|
12,810
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
115,682
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
25,039
|
|
|
|
2,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,550
|
|
Amortization of cemetery property
|
|
|
31,454
|
|
|
|
4,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,824
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
318,348
|
|
|
|
27,608
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
346,166
|
|
Gains (losses) on dispositions and impairment charges, net
|
|
|
18,942
|
|
|
|
(2,018
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
16,920
|
|
Long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
4,161,000
|
|
|
$
|
578,925
|
|
|
$
|
2,788
|
|
|
$
|
4,742,713
|
|
108
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
Canada
|
|
Germany
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,630,680
|
|
|
$
|
115,708
|
|
|
$
|
6,500
|
|
|
$
|
1,752,888
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
123,048
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,399
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
77,246
|
|
|
|
6,321
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
84,010
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
12,459
|
|
|
|
1,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,474
|
|
Amortization of cemetery property
|
|
|
25,829
|
|
|
|
2,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,263
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
178,944
|
|
|
|
17,385
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
196,678
|
|
(Losses) gains on dispositions and impairment charges, net
|
|
|
(56,710
|
)
|
|
|
(1,906
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(58,683
|
)
|
Long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
5,043,144
|
|
|
$
|
512,314
|
|
|
$
|
2,404
|
|
|
$
|
5,557,862
|
|
|
|
17.
|
Supplementary
Information
|
The detail of certain balance sheet accounts is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
33,764
|
|
|
$
|
42,928
|
|
Commercial paper and temporary investments
|
|
|
94,633
|
|
|
|
125,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
128,397
|
|
|
$
|
168,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivable
|
|
$
|
2,355
|
|
|
$
|
4,753
|
|
Atneed funeral receivables, net of allowances of $15,082 and
$14,834, respectively
|
|
|
71,184
|
|
|
|
82,734
|
|
Atneed cemetery receivables, net of allowances of $4,653 and
$4,641, respectively
|
|
|
13,651
|
|
|
|
16,068
|
|
Other
|
|
|
8,955
|
|
|
|
10,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
96,145
|
|
|
$
|
113,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Other current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax receivable
|
|
|
9,878
|
|
|
|
2,255
|
|
Prepaid insurance
|
|
|
2,361
|
|
|
|
4,932
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6,276
|
|
|
|
20,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,515
|
|
|
$
|
27,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery property:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undeveloped land
|
|
$
|
1,066,184
|
|
|
$
|
1,078,322
|
|
Developed land, lawn crypts, and mausoleums
|
|
|
392,797
|
|
|
|
373,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,458,981
|
|
|
$
|
1,451,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
473,208
|
|
|
$
|
494,715
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
1,371,235
|
|
|
|
1,355,324
|
|
Operating equipment
|
|
|
562,241
|
|
|
|
464,153
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
23,047
|
|
|
|
24,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,429,731
|
|
|
|
2,338,506
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(861,856
|
)
|
|
|
(768,972
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,567,875
|
|
|
$
|
1,569,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred charges and other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid covenants-not-to-compete, net
|
|
$
|
49,807
|
|
|
$
|
58,640
|
|
Preneed backlog intangible assets, net
|
|
|
35,331
|
|
|
|
40,900
|
|
Amortizable intangible assets, net
|
|
|
27,956
|
|
|
|
30,521
|
|
Non-amortizable
intangible assets, net
|
|
|
45,932
|
|
|
|
46,800
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
28,848
|
|
|
|
23,658
|
|
Notes receivable, net of allowances of $2,775 and $2,825,
respectively
|
|
|
14,407
|
|
|
|
25,172
|
|
Cash surrender value of insurance policies
|
|
|
78,423
|
|
|
|
75,385
|
|
Deferred trust tax asset
|
|
|
71,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
100,570
|
|
|
|
99,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
452,634
|
|
|
$
|
400,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
78,609
|
|
|
$
|
74,373
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
45,981
|
|
|
|
59,389
|
|
Accrued dividend
|
|
|
9,981
|
|
|
|
10,585
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
24,958
|
|
|
|
26,101
|
|
Accrued property taxes
|
|
|
16,466
|
|
|
|
17,121
|
|
Self insurance reserves
|
|
|
63,583
|
|
|
|
69,914
|
|
Bank overdraft.
|
|
|
22,044
|
|
|
|
27,689
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
33,237
|
|
|
|
58,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
294,859
|
|
|
$
|
343,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued pension
|
|
$
|
32,951
|
|
|
$
|
37,103
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
19,676
|
|
|
|
24,105
|
|
Customer refund obligation reserve
|
|
|
95,435
|
|
|
|
93,626
|
|
Tax liability
|
|
|
142,457
|
|
|
|
146,995
|
|
Indemnification liability
|
|
|
23,455
|
|
|
|
27,532
|
|
Other
|
|
|
42,116
|
|
|
|
54,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
356,090
|
|
|
$
|
383,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Revenues
and Costs and Expenses
The detail of certain income statement accounts in thousands is
as follows for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Merchandise revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
$
|
482,988
|
|
|
$
|
515,944
|
|
|
$
|
424,786
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
456,560
|
|
|
|
519,066
|
|
|
|
391,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total merchandise revenues
|
|
|
939,548
|
|
|
|
1,035,010
|
|
|
|
816,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
938,204
|
|
|
|
962,854
|
|
|
|
700,506
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
187,470
|
|
|
|
207,007
|
|
|
|
170,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total services revenues
|
|
|
1,125,674
|
|
|
|
1,169,861
|
|
|
|
871,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
90,400
|
|
|
|
80,432
|
|
|
|
65,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
2,155,622
|
|
|
$
|
2,285,303
|
|
|
$
|
1,752,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merchandise costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
$
|
246,867
|
|
|
$
|
256,753
|
|
|
$
|
198,053
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
199,033
|
|
|
|
205,629
|
|
|
|
161,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of merchandise
|
|
|
445,900
|
|
|
|
462,382
|
|
|
|
359,210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
453,704
|
|
|
|
473,559
|
|
|
|
353,117
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
105,903
|
|
|
|
112,175
|
|
|
|
93,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of services
|
|
|
559,607
|
|
|
|
585,734
|
|
|
|
446,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overhead and other expenses
|
|
|
731,344
|
|
|
|
770,340
|
|
|
|
598,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost and expenses
|
|
$
|
1,736,851
|
|
|
$
|
1,818,456
|
|
|
$
|
1,404,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain
Non-Cash Financing and Investing Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Value of StoneMor partnership units received in disposition
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,875
|
|
Dividends accrued but not paid
|
|
$
|
9,981
|
|
|
$
|
10,585
|
|
|
$
|
8,788
|
|
Basic earnings per common share (EPS) excludes dilution and is
computed by dividing Net income by the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS
reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities
or other obligations to issue common stock were exercised or
converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of
common stock that then shared in our earnings.
112
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic
and diluted EPS for the three years ended December 31 is
presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations (numerator):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations basic
|
|
$
|
97,445
|
|
|
$
|
243,317
|
|
|
$
|
52,604
|
|
After tax interest on convertible debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations diluted
|
|
$
|
97,445
|
|
|
$
|
243,496
|
|
|
$
|
52,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax
(numerator)
|
|
$
|
(362
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,412
|
|
|
$
|
3,907
|
|
Net income (numerator):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income basic
|
|
$
|
97,083
|
|
|
$
|
247,729
|
|
|
$
|
56,511
|
|
After tax interest on convertible debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income diluted
|
|
$
|
97,083
|
|
|
$
|
247,908
|
|
|
$
|
56,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares (denominator):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares basic
|
|
|
257,477
|
|
|
|
284,966
|
|
|
|
292,859
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
2,876
|
|
|
|
5,002
|
|
|
|
4,317
|
|
Convertible debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares diluted
|
|
|
260,446
|
|
|
|
290,444
|
|
|
|
297,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per share from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
.38
|
|
|
$
|
.85
|
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
.37
|
|
|
$
|
.83
|
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
Income per share from discontinued operations, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
.02
|
|
|
$
|
.01
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
.02
|
|
|
$
|
.01
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
.38
|
|
|
$
|
.87
|
|
|
$
|
.19
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
.37
|
|
|
$
|
.85
|
|
|
$
|
.19
|
|
The computation of diluted earnings per share excludes
outstanding stock options and convertible debt in certain
periods in which the inclusion of such options and debt would be
antidilutive in the periods presented. Total options and
convertible debentures not currently included in the computation
of dilutive earnings per share for the respective periods are as
follows (in shares):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Antidilutive options
|
|
|
3,135
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
5,420
|
|
Antidilutive convertible debentures
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common stock equivalents excluded from computations
|
|
|
3,302
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
6,022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.
|
Divestiture-Related
Activities
|
As dispositions occur in the normal course of business, gains or
losses on the sale of such businesses are recognized in the
income statement line item (Losses) gains on
divestitures and impairment charges, net.
113
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Additionally, as divestitures occur pursuant to our ongoing
asset sale programs, adjustments are made through this income
statement line item to reflect the difference between actual
proceeds received from the sale compared to the original
estimates.
(Losses) gains on divestitures and impairment charges, net
consist of the following for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(Losses) gains on divestitures, net
|
|
$
|
(4,695
|
)
|
|
$
|
30,083
|
|
|
$
|
(18,726
|
)
|
Impairment losses
|
|
|
(31,429
|
)
|
|
|
(13,163
|
)
|
|
|
(39,957
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(36,124
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,920
|
|
|
$
|
(58,683
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale
of Kenyon Operations
In October 2007, we divested 70% of our Kenyon investment for
proceeds of $0.7 million. We recognized a pre-tax gain of
$0.4 million in (Losses) gains on divestitures and
impairment charges, net in our consolidated statement of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Sale
of Operations in Michigan
In 2006, our Board of Directors approved a plan to divest
certain funeral homes and cemeteries in Michigan. We recognized
a pretax impairment charge in 2006 of $26.4 million related
to these properties. In 2007 and 2008, we recorded additional
impairment charges of $1.6 million and $13.9 million,
respectively. As of December 31, 2008, these locations
remain classified as assets held for sale.
Sale
of Operations in Singapore
In October 2006, we sold our businesses in Singapore for
proceeds of approximately $11.6 million. We recognized an
after-tax gain in 2006 of $2.9 million in Income from
discontinued operations in our consolidated statement of
operations as a result of this transaction. In 2007, we received
proceeds totaling $1.9 million and recorded a receivable of
$0.8 million related to this sale. We recognized an
after-tax gain in 2007 of $1.5 million in Income from
discontinued operations in our consolidated statement of
operations as a result of this transaction.
Sale
of Operations in Chile
In September 2005, we completed the sale of our cemetery
operations in Chile for proceeds of approximately
$106 million. We received net cash proceeds of
$90.0 million upon completion of the sale and received
additional cash proceeds of CLP 5.8 billion or
approximately $11.0 million in 2006. In the first quarter
of 2007, we received the remainder of the proceeds totaling CLP
2.5 billion or approximately $4.7 million.
Sales
of Assets to StoneMor Partners LP
In December 2007, we sold 46 cemeteries and 30 funeral homes to
StoneMor Partners LP (StoneMor) for proceeds of approximately
$71.0 million. As a result of this transaction, we
recognized a pre-tax gain of $21.1 million in (Losses)
gains on divestitures and impairment charges, net in our
consolidated statement of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
In September 2006, we sold 21 cemeteries and 14 funeral homes to
StoneMor for proceeds of approximately $11.8 million. We
received net cash proceeds of $5.9 million and 275,046
StoneMor units valued at $5.9 million. As a result of this
transaction, we recognized a pre-tax loss of $16.6 million
in (Losses) gains on divestitures and impairment charges, net
in our consolidated statement of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2006. In 2008, we received proceeds
totaling $5.9 million from the sale of our StoneMor units
acquired in the divestiture.
114
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Sale
of Mayflower National Life Insurance Company
In July 2007, we completed the sale of Mayflower National Life
Insurance Company, Alderwoods former insurance subsidiary, to
Assurant Inc. for proceeds of approximately $67.5 million.
We recognized a $1.5 million gain related to this sale in
the third quarter of 2007. The operations of this subsidiary are
presented as discontinued operations in our consolidated
statement of operations.
Equity
Investment and Redemption of Securities
In October 2007, we sold our remaining equity investment in our
French operations for 12.0 million euros, or
$17.0 million and recognized a gain on divestiture of
$17.6 million recorded in Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated subsidiaries. Proceeds received from this
sale are classified as an operating cash flow in the
accompanying statement of cash flows. In connection with this
sale, we also received 101.5 million euros, or
$144.0 million, in cash from the redemption of securities,
which included the remainder of our convertible preferred equity
certificates (CPECs), which were received in connection with the
original disposition of our operations in France in March 2004.
The CPECs had a carrying value of zero. In addition,
10 million euros, or approximately $14.1 million,
related to the redemption were deposited into a euro-denominated
escrow account for potential payment for existing
indemnification liabilities. We recognized a gain of
$158.1 million related to the redemption of these CPECs.
Proceeds of $158.7 million are classified as investing
activities in the accompanying statement of cash flows.
Assets
Held for Sale
We committed to a plan to sell certain operating properties as
of both December 31, 2008 and 2007. In connection with
these assets held for sale, we recorded impairment losses of
approximately $28 million and $13 million,
respectively, in our consolidated statement of operations for
the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.
Net assets held for sale were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
1,279
|
|
|
$
|
2,294
|
|
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
3,099
|
|
|
|
9,944
|
|
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
49,985
|
|
|
|
64,751
|
|
Cemetery property
|
|
|
11,047
|
|
|
|
9,341
|
|
Property and equipment, at cost, net
|
|
|
1,386
|
|
|
|
9,968
|
|
Deferred charges and other assets
|
|
|
11,748
|
|
|
|
12,390
|
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments
|
|
|
20,247
|
|
|
|
16,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
98,791
|
|
|
|
124,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
Deferred preneed funeral revenues
|
|
|
2,640
|
|
|
|
8,388
|
|
Deferred preneed cemetery revenues
|
|
|
51,730
|
|
|
|
67,141
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
920
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
Care trusts corpus
|
|
|
20,247
|
|
|
|
16,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
76,002
|
|
|
|
92,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets held for sale
|
|
$
|
22,789
|
|
|
$
|
32,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Discontinued
Operations
During the fourth quarter of 2006, we disposed of our funeral
operations in Singapore, which are classified as discontinued
operations for all periods presented.
As part of the Alderwoods transaction, we acquired an insurance
subsidiary that we sold on June 30, 2007. The operations of
this subsidiary from November 28, 2006 to June 30,
2007 are presented as discontinued operations in our
consolidated statement of operations. In addition, in the second
quarter of 2008, we settled an outstanding contingency related
to the 2005 divestiture of our operations in Argentina. The loss
related to this transaction is included in discontinued
operations for the year ended December 31, 2008.
The results of our discontinued operations for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
42,626
|
|
|
$
|
12,324
|
|
(Losses) gains on divestitures and impairment charges, net
|
|
|
(557
|
)
|
|
|
1,548
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
Costs and other expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,448
|
)
|
|
|
(11,093
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(557
|
)
|
|
|
9,230
|
|
|
|
1,359
|
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
(4,818
|
)
|
|
|
2,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
(362
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,412
|
|
|
$
|
3,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.
|
Alderwoods
Acquisition
|
On November 28, 2006, we acquired all of the outstanding
common stock of Alderwoods for $20.00 per share in cash,
resulting in a purchase price of approximately
$1.2 billion, which includes the refinancing of
$357.7 million and the assumption of $2.2 million of
Alderwoods debt. Included in our results of operations for
the year ended December 31, 2006 are the results of
Alderwoods operations from the date of acquisition through
December 31, 2006.
The primary reasons for the merger and the principal factors
that contributed to the recognition of goodwill in this
acquisition were:
|
|
|
|
|
the acquisition of Alderwoods creates a stronger company with
the benefits of increased size and scale, enabling us to serve a
number of new, complementary areas;
|
|
|
|
the acquisition of Alderwoods preneed backlog of deferred
revenues enhances our long-term stability; and
|
|
|
|
combining the two companies operations provides
significant synergies and related cost savings.
|
116
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following unaudited pro forma summary presents information
as if the merger had occurred as of January 1, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
|
|
|
per share amounts)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
2,358,644
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
15,505
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
22,450
|
|
Income from continuing operations per share:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
.05
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
.05
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
.08
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
.08
|
|
117
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
21.
|
Quarterly
Financial Data (Unaudited)
|
Quarterly financial data for 2008 and 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
Second
|
|
Third
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter(4)
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
573,451
|
|
|
$
|
548,782
|
|
|
$
|
516,439
|
|
|
$
|
516,950
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(435,854
|
)
|
|
|
(441,422
|
)
|
|
|
(434,370
|
)
|
|
|
(425,205
|
)
|
Gross profits
|
|
|
137,597
|
|
|
|
107,360
|
|
|
|
82,069
|
|
|
|
91,745
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
99,370
|
|
|
|
83,535
|
|
|
|
48,830
|
|
|
|
60,937
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes(1)
|
|
|
66,473
|
|
|
|
52,169
|
|
|
|
15,799
|
|
|
|
28,721
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(24,969
|
)
|
|
|
(20,395
|
)
|
|
|
(1,160
|
)
|
|
|
(19,193
|
)
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
41,504
|
|
|
|
31,774
|
|
|
|
14,639
|
|
|
|
9,528
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax(3)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(377
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
41,519
|
|
|
|
31,397
|
|
|
|
14,639
|
|
|
|
9,528
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS
|
|
|
.16
|
|
|
|
.12
|
|
|
|
.06
|
|
|
|
.04
|
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
|
.16
|
|
|
|
.12
|
|
|
|
.06
|
|
|
|
.04
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
607,555
|
|
|
$
|
565,492
|
|
|
$
|
539,334
|
|
|
$
|
572,922
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(466,572
|
)
|
|
|
(462,253
|
)
|
|
|
(436,819
|
)
|
|
|
(452,812
|
)
|
Gross profits
|
|
|
140,983
|
|
|
|
103,239
|
|
|
|
102,515
|
|
|
|
120,110
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
98,075
|
|
|
|
82,823
|
|
|
|
75,332
|
|
|
|
89,936
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes(1)(2)
|
|
|
58,214
|
|
|
|
41,850
|
|
|
|
42,907
|
|
|
|
244,016
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(23,497
|
)
|
|
|
(28,941
|
)
|
|
|
(14,062
|
)
|
|
|
(77,170
|
)
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
34,717
|
|
|
|
12,909
|
|
|
|
28,845
|
|
|
|
166,846
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax(3)
|
|
|
2,925
|
|
|
|
2,209
|
|
|
|
(675
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
37,642
|
|
|
|
15,118
|
|
|
|
28,170
|
|
|
|
166,799
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS
|
|
|
.13
|
|
|
|
.05
|
|
|
|
.10
|
|
|
|
.61
|
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
|
.13
|
|
|
|
.05
|
|
|
|
.10
|
|
|
|
.60
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes (Losses) gains on divestitures and impairment
charges, net, as described in Note 19. |
|
(2) |
|
Included in these amounts is a $158.1 million gain on
redemption of securities, recognized in fourth quarter of 2007,
representing the redemption of our securities which were
received in connection with the original disposition of our
former equity investment in France and a $36.6 million
equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries in France. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes income (loss) from discontinued operations as described
in Note 19. |
|
(4) |
|
In connection with our ongoing efforts to remediate our
previously reported material weaknesses and other internal
control deficiencies, we recorded several immaterial adjustments
to correct errors related to prior |
118
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
accounting periods during the year ended December 31, 2008.
The net impact of these adjustments was a decrease to our
pre-tax income and net income in the amount of $2.1 million
and $5.5 million, respectively, for the quarter ended
December 31, 2008. |
119
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Three Years Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged
|
|
Charged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
(Credited) to
|
|
(Credited) to
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
Costs and
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
End of
|
Description
|
|
of Period
|
|
Expenses
|
|
Accounts(1)
|
|
Write-Offs(2)
|
|
Period
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Current provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
19,475
|
|
|
$
|
9,314
|
|
|
$
|
305
|
|
|
$
|
(9,359
|
)
|
|
$
|
19,735
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
25,793
|
|
|
|
11,489
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(17,816
|
)
|
|
|
19,475
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
11,835
|
|
|
|
10,020
|
|
|
|
12,060
|
|
|
|
(8,122
|
)
|
|
|
25,793
|
|
Due After One Year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
2,825
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(50
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,775
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
3,844
|
|
|
|
(705
|
)
|
|
|
(314
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,825
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
7,312
|
|
|
|
(2,100
|
)
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
(1,818
|
)
|
|
|
3,844
|
|
Preneed Funeral and Preneed Cemetery
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
64,062
|
|
|
$
|
1,305
|
|
|
$
|
(6,749
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
58,618
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
81,572
|
|
|
|
(3,546
|
)
|
|
|
(13,964
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,062
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
60,358
|
|
|
|
(803
|
)
|
|
|
22,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,572
|
|
Deferred Preneed Funeral and Cemetery
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
(143,730
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,961
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(137,769
|
)
|
Year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
(151,341
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(143,730
|
)
|
Year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
(112,002
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,339
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(151,341
|
)
|
Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
68,469
|
|
|
$
|
(2,355
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,708
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
69,822
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
70,547
|
|
|
|
8,034
|
|
|
|
(10,112
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,469
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
34,829
|
|
|
|
(3,033
|
)
|
|
|
38,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,547
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Primarily relates to acquisitions and dispositions of operations. |
|
(2) |
|
Uncollected receivables written off, net of recoveries. |
120
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of December 31, 2008, we carried out an evaluation,
under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief
Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer
(CFO), of the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act)). Our disclosure controls and
procedures are designed to ensure that information required to
be disclosed in the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) reports we file or submit under the Exchange
Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time period specified by the SECs rules and forms and that
such information is accumulated and communicated to management,
including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. In light of the
material weakness set forth below, these officers have concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective
as of December 31, 2008. To address the material weakness
described below, we performed additional review and analysis and
other post-closing procedures to ensure that our income tax
provision and related tax disclosures were prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (US GAAP). Based on the additional
procedures performed, management has concluded that the
consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
fairly present, in all material respects, our financial
condition, result of operations and cash flows for the periods
presented in conformity with US GAAP.
Managements
Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial
reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the
preparation of our financial statements for external reporting
purposes in accordance with US GAAP. Internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary
to permit preparation of our financial statements in accordance
with US GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being
made only in accordance with authorizations of our management
and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with policies and procedures may deteriorate.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, we have assessed the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008. In making this assessment, our
management used the criteria described in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). Based on this assessment and those criteria, and as
described below, our management concluded that the Company did
not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2008 as a result of a material weakness
in accounting for income taxes.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of
deficiencies, that results in a reasonable possibility that a
material misstatement of the Companys annual or interim
financial statements will not be prevented or detected
121
on a timely basis. As of December 31, 2008, management
identified the following material weakness in its assessment of
the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting:
|
|
|
|
|
We did not maintain effective controls over our accounting for
income taxes. Specifically, we did not maintain effective
controls over the completeness and accuracy of our quarterly and
year-end tax provision calculations and related deferred income
taxes and income taxes payable in accordance with US GAAP.
|
This control deficiency resulted in various audit adjustments to
the consolidated financial statements in the first and fourth
quarters of 2008. Additionally, this control deficiency, if not
corrected, could result in a material misstatement of the income
tax accounts that would result in a material misstatement in our
annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would
not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Therefore, we
have concluded that this control deficiency constitutes a
material weakness.
The effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 has been
audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is
included herein.
Managements
Remediation Initiatives
In our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007, management identified
two material weaknesses in our internal control over financial
reporting. These material weaknesses included a material
weakness relating to our accounting for income taxes and a
material weakness relating to the timely completion and review
of certain of our balance sheet account reconciliations. In
response to those two identified material weaknesses, we took a
number of substantial actions during the year ended
December 31, 2008. As a result of these actions, the
material weakness relating to the timely completion and review
of certain of our balance sheet account reconciliations has been
remediated. While we took considerable action to remediate the
material weakness in our accounting for income taxes existing as
of December 31, 2007, such remediation has not yet been
fully evidenced.
To address the material weakness in our accounting for income
taxes, we have implemented or will implement the following
remediation steps to enhance our internal controls over the
calculation of our income tax provision and related balance
sheet accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
The hiring of an experienced Managing Director in the first
quarter of 2008 to lead the Companys tax department, with
responsibility for direction and oversight of all income tax and
other tax functions.
|
|
|
|
The reorganization of our tax departments organizational
structure to facilitate our staffing of the department with an
adequate mix of qualified personnel.
|
|
|
|
The hiring of experienced tax professionals in all tax director
and manager level positions in 2008.
|
|
|
|
The provision of FAS 109 technical training for all of our
tax personnel.
|
|
|
|
The completion of a tax basis balance sheet project with the
assistance of third party advisors in the fourth quarter of 2008.
|
|
|
|
The implementation of a tax software solution in 2009 to replace
manual processes and spreadsheets currently used to compute our
state and federal income tax provision.
|
|
|
|
The simplification of our legal and reporting structure in 2009,
which we believe will facilitate the efficiency and
effectiveness of our state income tax provision.
|
We believe the foregoing actions have improved, and will
continue to improve, our internal control over financial
reporting and our disclosure controls and procedures.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting during the most recently completed fiscal
quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
122
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
Information required by PART III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13
and 14) has been omitted as we intend to file with the
Commission not later than 120 days after the end of our
fiscal year a definitive proxy statement that includes such
information. Such information is set forth in such proxy
statement (i) with respect to Item 10, under the
captions Proxy Voting: Questions and Answers,
Election of Directors, Other
Matters Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance and Report of the Audit
Committee, (ii) with respect to Items 11 and 13,
under the captions Election of Directors,
Compensation Discussion and Analysis,
Compensation Committee Report, Certain
Information with Respect to Officers and Directors,
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation and Certain Transactions,
(iii) with respect to Item 12, under the caption
Voting Securities and Principal Holders, and
(iv) with respect to Item 14, under the caption
Proposal to Approve the Selection of Independent
Accountants Audit Fees and All Other Fees. The
information as specified in the preceding sentence is
incorporated herein by reference; provided however,
notwithstanding anything set forth in this
Form 10-K,
the information under the captions Compensation Committee
Report and Report of the Audit Committee in
such proxy statement, is not incorporated by reference into this
Form 10-K.
The information regarding our executive officers called for by
Item 401 of
Regulation S-K
and the information regarding our code of ethics called for by
Item 406 of
Regulation S-K
has been included in PART I of this report. The information
regarding our equity compensation plan information called for by
Item 201(d) of
Regulation S-K
is set forth below.
Equity Compensation Plan Information at December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available for
|
|
|
Number of Securities to be
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
Future Issuance Under
|
|
|
Issued upon Exercise of
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
(Excluding Securities
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
Reflected in Column (a))
|
Plan Category
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
9,288,287
|
|
|
|
7.99
|
|
|
|
12,068,455
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders(1)
|
|
|
1,517,602
|
|
|
|
6.63
|
|
|
|
2,184,775
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
10,805,889
|
|
|
|
7.79
|
|
|
|
14,253,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes options outstanding under the 1996 Nonqualified
Incentive Plan under which nonqualified stock options were
granted to employees who are not officers or directors. We have
1,517,602 total options outstanding under the 1996 Non-qualified
Incentive Plan. No shares of our common stock are available for
any future grants under this plan. See Note 14 in
Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data, |
123
|
|
|
|
|
for a further description of 1996 Nonqualified Incentive Plan.
This plan has not been submitted for shareholder approval. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes an estimated 2,184,775 shares available under the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Under such plan, a dollar value of
shares (not an amount of shares) are registered. The above
estimate was determined by dividing (i) the remaining
unissued dollar value of registered shares at December 31,
2008, which was $10.9 million, by (ii) the closing
price of $4.97 per share of common stock at December 31,
2008. |
The Employee Stock Purchase Plan enables Company employees in
North America to invest via payroll deductions up to $500 (or
$600 Canadian) per month in our common stock. Contributions are
utilized to purchase the stock in the open market. With respect
to Canadian employees who meet certain requirements, we will
provide annually a match equal to 25% of the amount of the
employees contribution subject to a maximum contribution
per participant of $1,800 Canadian. This plan has not been
submitted for shareholder approval.
Certifications
In 2008, the Company submitted to the New York Stock Exchange
the Section 12(a) certification by the Companys Chief
Executive Officer regarding compliance with the Exchanges
corporate governance listing standards. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
Section 302 certifications regarding the quality of the
Companys public disclosure are attached as
Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this report on
Form 10-K.
124
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedule
|
(a)(1)-(2) Financial Statements and Schedule:
The financial statements and schedule are listed in the
accompanying Index to Financial Statements and Related Schedule
on page 46 of this report.
(3) Exhibits:
The exhibits listed on the accompanying Exhibit Index on
pages
128-131 are
filed as part of this report.
(b) Included in (a) above.
(c) Included in (a) above.
125
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant, Service
Corporation International, has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ gregory
t. sangalis
|
(Gregory T. Sangalis,
Senior Vice President, General
Counsel, and Secretary)
Dated: February 27, 2009
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
date indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ R.
L. WALTRIP*
(R.
L. Waltrip)
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
February 27, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ THOMAS
L. RYAN*
(Thomas
L. Ryan)
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director (Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
February 27, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ERIC
D. TANZBERGER*
(Eric
D. Tanzberger)
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
February 27, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JEFFREY
I. BEASON*
(Jeffrey
I. Beason)
|
|
Vice President and Corporate Controller (Chief Accounting
Officer)
|
|
February 27, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ALAN
R. BUCKWALTER, III*
(Alan
R. Buckwalter, III)
|
|
Director
|
|
February 27, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ANTHONY
L. COELHO*
(Anthony
L. Coelho)
|
|
Director
|
|
February 27, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ A.
J. FOYT, JR.*
(A.
J. Foyt, Jr.)
|
|
Director
|
|
February 27, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ MALCOLM
GILLIS*
(Malcolm
Gillis)
|
|
Director
|
|
February 27, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ VICTOR
L. LUND*
(Victor
L. Lund)
|
|
Director
|
|
February 27, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JOHN
W. MECOM, JR.*
(John
W. Mecom, Jr.)
|
|
Director
|
|
February 27, 2009
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ CLIFTON
H. MORRIS, JR.*
(Clifton
H. Morris, Jr.)
|
|
Director
|
|
February 27, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ W.
BLAIR WALTRIP*
(W.
Blair Waltrip)
|
|
Director
|
|
February 27, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ EDWARD
E. WILLIAMS*
(Edward
E. Williams)
|
|
Director
|
|
February 27, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*By
|
|
/s/ GREGORY
T. SANGALIS
(Gregory
T. Sangalis, as
Attorney-In-Fact
For each of the Persons indicated)
|
|
|
|
|
127
EXHIBIT INDEX
PURSUANT
TO ITEM 601 OF REG. S-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.1 to Registration Statement
No. 333-10867
on
Form S-3).
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Articles of Amendment to Restated Articles of Incorporation.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 1996).
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
|
|
Statement of Resolution Establishing Series of Shares of
Series D Junior Participating Preferred Stock, dated
July 27, 1998. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 to
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 1998).
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
|
|
Bylaws, as amended. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to
Form 8-K
dated November 16, 2007).
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Senior Indenture dated as of February 1, 1993 by and
between the Company and The Bank of New York, as trustee.
(Incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.1 to
Form S-4
filed September 2, 2004 (File
No. 333-118763)).
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Agreement of Resignation, Appointment of Acceptance, dated
October 21, 2005, among the Company, The Bank of New York
and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., appointing a
successor trustee for the Senior Indenture dated as of
February 1, 1993. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plan For Non-Employee Directors. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1991).
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Retirement Plan For Non-Employee Directors.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000).
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
|
|
Agreement dated May 14, 1992 between the Company, R. L.
Waltrip and related parties relating to life insurance.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1992).
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated December 28, 2006, between SCI
Executive Services, Inc. and R.L. Waltrip (including
Non-Competition Agreement and Amendment to Employment Agreement,
dated November 11, 1991, among the Company, R. L. Waltrip
and Claire Waltrip). (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
|
|
Amendment to Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated
November 30, 2007, between SCI Executive Services, Inc. and
R. L. Waltrip. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5
to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007).
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
|
|
Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated January 1,
2004, between SCI Executive Services, Inc. and Thomas L. Ryan.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003).
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
|
|
Addendum to Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated
December 1, 2005, between SCI Executive Services, Inc. and
Thomas L. Ryan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12
to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
|
|
Amendment to Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated
November 30, 2007, between SCI Executive Services, Inc. and
Thomas L. Ryan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8
to
Form 10-K
for fiscal year ended December 31, 2007).
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
|
|
Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated January 1,
2004, between SCI Executive Services, Inc. and Michael R. Webb.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003).
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
|
|
Addendum to Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated
December 1, 2005, between SCI Executive Services, Inc. and
Michael R. Webb. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.14 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
|
|
Amendment to Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated
November 30, 2007, between SCI Executive Services, Inc. and
Michael R. Webb. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.11 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007).
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
|
|
Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated December 28,
2006 between SCI Executive Services, Inc. and Eric D.
Tanzberger. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
|
|
Amendment to Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated
November 30, 2007, between SCI Executive Services, Inc. and
Eric D. Tanzberger. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.13 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007).
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
|
|
Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated February 9,
2005, between SCI Executive Services, Inc. and J. Daniel
Garrison; Addendum to Employment and Noncompetition Agreement,
dated December 1, 2005, between SCI Executive Services,
Inc. and J. Daniel Garrison; Amendment to Employment and
Noncompetition Agreement, dated November 30, 2007, between
SCI Executive Services, Inc. and J. Daniel Garrison.
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
|
|
Form of Employment and Noncompetition Agreement pertaining to
non-senior officers. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.12 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003).
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
|
|
Form of Addendum to Employment and Noncompetition Agreement
pertaining to the preceding exhibit. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.20 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
|
|
Form of Amendment to Employment and Noncompetition Agreement
dated November 30, 2007, between SCI Executive Services,
Inc. and non-senior officers. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.18 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007).
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
|
|
1993 Long-Term Incentive Stock Option Plan. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.12 to Registration Statement
No. 333-00179
on
Form S-8).
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
|
|
Amendment to 1993 Long-Term Incentive Stock Option Plan, dated
February 12, 1997. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.15 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996).
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
|
|
Amendment to 1993 Long-Term Incentive Stock Option Plan, dated
November 13, 1997. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.17 to
Form 10-K
for fiscal year ended December 31, 1997).
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
|
|
Amended 1996 Incentive Plan. (Incorporated by reference to
Appendix A to Proxy Statement dated April 6, 2007).
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
|
|
Split Dollar Life Insurance Plan. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.36 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995).
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for Senior Officers (as
Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 1998).
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998).
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for
Senior Officers. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.28 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000).
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
|
|
SCI 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan as Amended and Restated.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Registration
Statement
No. 333-119681).
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to the SCI 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
|
|
Second Amendment to the SCI 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan, and
Third Amendment to the SCI 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
|
|
Fourth Amendment to the SCI 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
|
|
Fifth Amendment to the SCI 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007).
|
|
10
|
.30
|
|
|
|
Sixth Amendment to the SCI 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan.
|
|
10
|
.31
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Director Fee Plan. (Incorporated by
reference to Annex A to Proxy Statement dated
April 17, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.32
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 1.1 to Registration Statement
No. 2-62484
on
Form S-8).
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.33
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 15.1 to Registration
Statement
No. 2-62484
on
Form S-8).
|
|
10
|
.34
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 28.3 to Registration
Statement
No. 33-25061
on
Form S-8).
|
|
10
|
.35
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 28.4 to Registration
Statement
No. 33-35708
on
Form S-8).
|
|
10
|
.36
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 5 to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999).
|
|
10
|
.37
|
|
|
|
Agreement between Merrill Lynch Canada Inc. and Service
Corporation International. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 28.5 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to
Registration Statement
No. 33-8907
on
Form S-8).
|
|
10
|
.38
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Agreement between Merrill Lynch Canada Inc.
and Service Corporation International. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 21, 1993).
|
|
10
|
.39
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan Administration Agreement dated
July 25, 2001 between Service Corporation International
(Canada) Limited and Fastrak Systems Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.48 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002).
|
|
10
|
.40
|
|
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement for officers and directors.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.41
|
|
|
|
Form of Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.52 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.42
|
|
|
|
Form of Amendment to Executive Deferred Compensation Plan.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.49 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007).
|
|
10
|
.43
|
|
|
|
Form of Performance Unit Grant Award Agreement.
|
|
10
|
.44
|
|
|
|
Note Purchase Agreement, dated November 28, 2006 among
Service Corporation International and Purchasers identified
therein. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated November 28, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.45
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of
June 11, 2007, among the Company and the purchasers party
thereto. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Form 8-K
dated June 20, 2007).
|
|
10
|
.46
|
|
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated November 28, 2006 among Service
Corporation International, the lenders party thereto, and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Current Report
on
Form 8-K
dated November 28, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.47
|
|
|
|
Agreement and First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of
June 14, 2007, among the Company and the lenders party
thereto. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Form 8-K
dated June 20, 2007).
|
|
12
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Company.
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
(PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP).
|
|
24
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Powers of Attorney.
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of Thomas L. Ryan as Principal Executive Officer
in satisfaction of Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Certification of Eric D. Tanzberger as Principal Financial
Officer in satisfaction of Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by Thomas L. Ryan as
Principal Executive Officer in satisfaction of Section 906
of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by Eric D.
Tanzberger as Principal Financial Officer in satisfaction of
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
In the above list, the management contracts or compensatory
plans or arrangements are set forth in Exhibits 10.1
through 10.43.
130
Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4) of
Regulation S-K,
there are not filed as exhibits to this report certain
instruments with respect to long-term debt under which the total
amount of securities authorized thereunder does not exceed
10 percent of the total assets of Registrant and its
subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. Registrant agrees to
furnish a copy of any such instrument to the Commission upon
request.
131