e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 27, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the transition period from
to
Commission File Number 0-19528
QUALCOMM Incorporated
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
95-3685934 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
5775 Morehouse Dr., San Diego, California
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
92121-1714
(Zip Code) |
(858) 587-1121
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the
close of business on July 19, 2010, was as follows:
|
|
|
Class |
|
Number of Shares |
Common Stock, $0.0001 per share par value
|
|
1,605,194,616 |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
QUALCOMM Incorporated
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,541 |
|
|
$ |
2,717 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
7,427 |
|
|
|
8,352 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
798 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
453 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
11,614 |
|
|
|
12,570 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
7,618 |
|
|
|
6,673 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
1,774 |
|
|
|
843 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
2,382 |
|
|
|
2,387 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
1,492 |
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
3,040 |
|
|
|
3,065 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,497 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
29,401 |
|
|
$ |
27,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
$ |
640 |
|
|
$ |
636 |
|
Payroll and other benefits related liabilities |
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
Unearned revenues |
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
441 |
|
Loan payable to banks |
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
1,135 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
|
1,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
5,190 |
|
|
|
2,813 |
|
Unearned revenues |
|
|
3,587 |
|
|
|
3,464 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
9,515 |
|
|
|
7,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; issuable in series;
8 shares authorized; none outstanding at
June 27, 2010 and September 27, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 6,000 shares
authorized; 1,609 and 1,669 shares issued and
outstanding at June 27, 2010 and September 27, 2009,
respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in capital |
|
|
6,611 |
|
|
|
8,493 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
12,746 |
|
|
|
11,235 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
19,886 |
|
|
|
20,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
29,401 |
|
|
$ |
27,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
QUALCOMM Incorporated
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In millions, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
June 28, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
June 28, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment and services |
|
$ |
1,772 |
|
|
$ |
1,862 |
|
|
$ |
5,030 |
|
|
$ |
4,698 |
|
Licensing and royalty fees |
|
|
934 |
|
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
3,009 |
|
|
|
3,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
2,706 |
|
|
|
2,753 |
|
|
|
8,039 |
|
|
|
7,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of equipment and services revenues |
|
|
905 |
|
|
|
864 |
|
|
|
2,529 |
|
|
|
2,357 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
1,892 |
|
|
|
1,826 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
1,171 |
|
|
|
1,165 |
|
Litigation settlement, patent license
and other related items (Note 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
1,859 |
|
|
|
5,592 |
|
|
|
6,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
894 |
|
|
|
2,447 |
|
|
|
1,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income (loss), net (Note 5) |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
971 |
|
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
2,988 |
|
|
|
1,334 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(204 |
) |
|
|
(247 |
) |
|
|
(606 |
) |
|
|
(544 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
767 |
|
|
$ |
737 |
|
|
$ |
2,382 |
|
|
$ |
790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
1.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in per share calculations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
1,629 |
|
|
|
1,656 |
|
|
|
1,654 |
|
|
|
1,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
1,642 |
|
|
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
1,670 |
|
|
|
1,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per share announced |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
QUALCOMM Incorporated
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
June 28, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,382 |
|
|
$ |
790 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
460 |
|
Revenues related to non-monetary exchanges |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
Income tax provision in excess of income tax payments |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
Non-cash portion of share-based compensation expense |
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
436 |
|
Incremental tax benefit from stock options exercised |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
Net realized gains on marketable securities and other investments |
|
|
(274 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
Impairment losses on marketable securities and other investments |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
Other items, net |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
2,691 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
Trade accounts payable |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Payroll, benefits and other liabilities |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
737 |
|
Unearned revenues |
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
2,983 |
|
|
|
5,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(313 |
) |
|
|
(617 |
) |
Advance payment on spectrum |
|
|
(1,064 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchases of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(7,049 |
) |
|
|
(6,497 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
7,354 |
|
|
|
3,606 |
|
Cash received for partial settlement of investment receivables |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
Other investments and acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
Change in collateral held under securities lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
173 |
|
Other items, net |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
|
(996 |
) |
|
|
(3,027 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowing under loan payable to banks |
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
Incremental tax benefit from stock options exercised |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Repurchase and retirement of common stock |
|
|
(2,893 |
) |
|
|
(285 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
(872 |
) |
|
|
(810 |
) |
Change in obligations under securities lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(173 |
) |
Other items, net |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by financing activities |
|
|
(2,150 |
) |
|
|
(938 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
|
1,881 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
2,717 |
|
|
|
1,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
2,541 |
|
|
$ |
3,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
QUALCOMM Incorporated
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
Financial Statement Preparation. The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared by QUALCOMM Incorporated and its
subsidiaries (collectively the Company or QUALCOMM), without audit, in
accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not necessarily include all
information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of its consolidated financial position,
results of operations and cash flows in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 27, 2009 was derived from
the audited financial statements at that date but may not include all disclosures required by
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The Company operates and reports
using a 52-53 week fiscal year ending on the last Sunday in September. The three-month and
nine-month periods ended June 27, 2010 and June 28, 2009 included 13 weeks and 39 weeks,
respectively.
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial information for the interim periods
presented reflects all adjustments, which are only normal and recurring, necessary for a fair
statement of results of operations, financial position and cash flows. These condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements
included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2009.
Operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of operating results for an
entire fiscal year.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts and the disclosure of contingent amounts in the Companys financial statements and
the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain prior year
amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Revenue Recognition. Beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company elected to
early adopt the Financial Accounting Standards Boards (FASB) amended accounting guidance for
revenue recognition that (a) removes tangible products containing software components and
non-software components that function together to deliver the products essential functionality
from the scope of software revenue recognition guidance; and (b) eliminates the use of the residual
method for arrangements with multiple deliverables and requires entities to allocate revenue using
the relative selling price method. This new guidance applies to applicable transactions originating
or arrangements materially modified after September 27, 2009. The adoption of this new guidance did
not have a material impact on the timing or pattern of revenue recognition.
Earnings Per Common Share. Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income
by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted
earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by the combination of dilutive common
share equivalents, comprised of shares issuable under the Companys share-based compensation plans
and the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Dilutive
common share equivalents include the dilutive effect of share equivalents, which is calculated
based on the average share price for each period using the treasury stock method. Under the
treasury stock method, the exercise price of an option, the amount of compensation cost, if any,
for future service that the Company has not yet recognized, and the estimated tax benefits that
would be recorded in paid-in capital, if any, when the award is settled are assumed to be used to
repurchase shares in the current period. Share-based awards with market conditions are included in
the computation of earnings per share if they are dilutive and if the established conditions have
been satisfied or would have been satisfied at the reporting date. The incremental dilutive common
share equivalents, calculated using the treasury stock method, for the three months and nine months
ended June 27, 2010 were 13,039,000 and 16,303,000, respectively. The incremental dilutive common
share equivalents, calculated using the treasury stock method, for the three months and nine months
ended June 28, 2009 were 18,781,000 and 15,114,000, respectively.
Employee stock options to purchase approximately 163,146,000 and 145,464,000 shares of common
stock during the three months and nine months ended June 27, 2010, respectively, and employee stock
options to purchase approximately 134,515,000 and 149,528,000 shares of common stock during the
three months and nine months ended June 28, 2009, were outstanding but not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per common share because the effect on diluted earnings per share
would be anti-dilutive. The computation of diluted earnings per share for the three months and nine
months ended June 27, 2010 excluded 574,000 and 314,000 performance-
6
QUALCOMM Incorporated
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
based stock units issued during
fiscal 2010, respectively, because the effect on diluted earnings per share would be anti-dilutive.
Comprehensive Income. Total comprehensive income consisted of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
June 28, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
June 28, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
767 |
|
|
$ |
737 |
|
|
$ |
2,382 |
|
|
$ |
790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
Noncredit
other-than-temporary impairment losses and subsequent changes in fair
value related to certain marketable debt securities, net of income taxes |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
Net
unrealized (losses) gains on other marketable securities and
derivative instruments, net of income taxes |
|
|
(180 |
) |
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
(283 |
) |
Reclassification
of net realized gains on marketable securities and derivative instruments included in net income, net of income taxes |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
Reclassification
of other-than-temporary losses on marketable securities included in net income, net of income taxes |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
476 |
|
|
$ |
1,539 |
|
|
$ |
2,323 |
|
|
$ |
1,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of accumulated other comprehensive income consisted of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Noncredit
other-than-temporary impairment losses and subsequent changes in fair
value related to certain marketable debt securities, net of income taxes |
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
Net
unrealized gains on other marketable securities, net of income taxes |
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
Net
unrealized losses on derivative instruments, net of income taxes |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
529 |
|
|
$ |
588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 27, 2010, the accumulated noncredit other-than-temporary impairment losses
included $40 million of other-than-temporary losses on marketable debt securities related to
factors other than credit, net of income taxes.
Share-Based Payments. Total estimated share-based compensation expense was as follows (in
millions):
7
QUALCOMM Incorporated
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
June 28, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
June 28, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cost of equipment and services revenues |
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense before income taxes |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
436 |
|
Related income tax benefit |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense, net of income taxes |
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
$ |
322 |
|
|
$ |
370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recorded $73 million and $68 million in share-based compensation expense
during the nine months ended June 27, 2010 and June 28, 2009, respectively, related to share-based
awards granted during those periods. In addition, for the nine months ended June 27, 2010 and June
28, 2009, $34 million and $54 million, respectively, were reclassified to reduce net cash provided
by operating activities with an offsetting increase in net cash used by financing activities to
reflect the incremental tax benefits from stock options exercised in those periods. At June 27,
2010, total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options granted prior to
that date was $1.2 billion, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
2.9 years. Net stock options, after forfeitures and cancellations, granted during the nine months
ended June 27, 2010 and June 28, 2009 represented 1.3% and 2.2%, respectively, of outstanding
shares as of the beginning of each fiscal period. Total stock options granted during the nine
months ended June 27, 2010 and June 28, 2009 represented 1.8% and 2.4%, respectively, of
outstanding shares as of the end of each fiscal period.
During the three months ended June 27, 2010, the Company granted approximately 5,569,000
restricted stock units on a broad basis to employees. The awards include dividend-equivalent rights
and generally vest three years from the date of grant. The weighted-average estimated fair value of
the employee restricted stock units granted during fiscal 2010 was $35.59 per share, determined
based on the fair value of the Companys common stock on the grant date. At June 27, 2010,
approximately 5,551,000 awards were unvested, and the total unrecognized estimated compensation
cost related to non-vested restricted stock units granted prior to that date was $176 million,
which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.9 years.
Note 2 Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to
transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date.
Applicable accounting guidance provides an established hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair
value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by
requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that
market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability and are developed based on market
data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect
the Companys assumptions about the factors that market participants would use in valuing the asset
or liability. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
|
|
|
Level 1 includes financial instruments for which quoted market prices for identical
instruments are available in active markets. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 includes financial instruments for which there are inputs other than quoted
prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the instrument such as quoted
prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or
similar instruments in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions
(less active markets) or model-driven valuations in which significant inputs are
observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market
data. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 includes financial instruments for which fair value is derived from
valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs are unobservable,
including the Companys own assumptions. |
Assets and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant
to the fair value measurements. The Company reviews the fair value hierarchy classification on a
quarterly basis. Changes in the
8
QUALCOMM Incorporated
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
observability of valuation inputs may result in a reclassification
of levels for certain securities within the fair value hierarchy.
The following table presents the Companys fair value hierarchy for assets and liabilities
measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 27, 2010 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,693 |
|
|
$ |
537 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Treasury securities and government-related securities |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
950 |
|
Corporate bonds and notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,228 |
|
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
766 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
772 |
|
Auction rate securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
Non-investment-grade debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,146 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
3,159 |
|
Common and preferred stock |
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,604 |
|
Equity mutual and exchange-traded funds |
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
943 |
|
Debt mutual funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total marketable securities |
|
|
1,998 |
|
|
|
12,857 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
15,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
Other investments (1) |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value |
|
$ |
3,824 |
|
|
$ |
13,409 |
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
$ |
17,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
Other liabilities (1) |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value |
|
$ |
133 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Comprised of the Companys deferred compensation plan liability and related assets
which are invested in mutual funds. |
Marketable Securities. With the exception of auction rate securities, the Company obtains
pricing information from quoted market prices, recognized independent pricing vendors or multiple
pricing vendors, or quotes from brokers/dealers. The Company conducts reviews of its primary
pricing vendors to validate that the inputs used in that vendors pricing process are deemed to be
observable.
The fair value of other government-related securities and investment- and non-investment-grade
corporate bonds and notes is generally determined using standard observable inputs, including
matrix pricing or reported trades, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads,
two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids and/or offers.
The fair value of debt mutual funds is determined based on published net asset values. Debt
mutual funds are included in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy if the net asset values are
reported other than daily or if the mutual funds are considered illiquid. The Company looks to the
characteristics of the underlying collateral to assess the funds valuation and to determine
whether fair value is determined using observable or unobservable inputs.
The fair value of mortgage- and asset-backed securities is derived from the use of matrix
pricing or cash flow pricing models in which inputs are observable, including contractual terms,
maturity, prepayment speeds, credit rating and securitization structure, to determine the timing
and amount of future cash flows. Certain mortgage- and asset-backed securities, principally those
that are rated below AAA, require use of significant unobservable inputs to estimate fair value,
including significant assumptions about prioritization of the payment schedule, default likelihood,
recovery rates and prepayment speed.
The fair value of auction rate securities is estimated by the Company using a discounted cash
flow model that incorporates transaction details such as contractual terms, maturity and timing and
amount of future cash flows, as well as assumptions related to liquidity and credit valuation
adjustments of market participants. Though the vast majority of the securities are pools of student
loans guaranteed by the U.S. government, prepayment speeds and
9
QUALCOMM Incorporated
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
illiquidity discounts are considered
significant unobservable inputs. Therefore, auction rate securities are included in Level 3.
Derivative Instruments. Derivative instruments include foreign currency option contracts to
hedge certain foreign currency transactions. Derivative instruments are valued using standard
calculations/models that are primarily based on observable inputs, including foreign currency
exchange rates, volatilities and interest rates. Therefore, derivative instruments are included in
Level 2.
Activity between Levels of the Fair Value Hierarchy. There were no significant transfers
between Level 1 and Level 2 during the nine months ended June 27, 2010 or June 28, 2009. When a
determination is made to classify an asset or liability within Level 3, the determination is based
upon the significance of the unobservable inputs to the overall fair value measurement. The
following table includes the activity for marketable securities classified within Level 3 of the
valuation hierarchy (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 27, 2010 |
|
|
|
Auction rate |
|
|
Other marketable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
securities |
|
|
securities |
|
|
Total |
|
Beginning balance of Level 3 marketable securities |
|
$ |
174 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
205 |
|
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in investment income (loss), net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
Settlements |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
Transfers into Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance of Level 3 marketable securities |
|
$ |
171 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 28, 2009 |
|
|
|
Auction rate |
|
|
Other marketable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
securities |
|
|
securities |
|
|
Total |
|
Beginning balance of Level 3 marketable securities |
|
$ |
186 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
211 |
|
Total realized and unrealized (losses) gains: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in investment loss, net |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Settlements |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
Transfers into Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance of Level 3 marketable securities |
|
$ |
181 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys policy is to recognize transfers into and out of levels within the fair
value hierarchy at the end of the fiscal month in which the actual event or change in circumstances
that caused the transfer occurs. Transfers into Level 3 in the nine-month periods ended June 27,
2010 and June 28, 2009 primarily consisted of debt securities with significant inputs that became
unobservable as a result of an increased likelihood of a shortfall in contractual cash flows or a
significant downgrade in the credit ratings.
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements. The Company measures certain assets at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis. These assets include cost and equity method investments when they are deemed to
be other-than-temporarily impaired, assets acquired and liabilities assumed in an acquisition or in
a nonmonetary exchange, and property, plant and equipment and intangible assets that are written
down to fair value when they are held for sale or determined to be impaired. During the nine months
ended June 27, 2010 and June 28, 2009, the Company recorded $7 million and $13 million,
respectively, in other-than-temporary impairments on cost and equity method investments, which had
carrying values of $15 million and $5 million at June 27, 2010 and June 28, 2009, respectively. The
fair value of
these investments was measured using financial metrics, comparison to other private and public
companies and analysis of the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, including
recent financing activities and their capital structure as well as other economic variables. These
fair value measurements were classified as Level 3 because the Company used significant
unobservable inputs to value them, principally because the issuers are non-public entities.
10
QUALCOMM Incorporated
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 3 Marketable Securities
Marketable securities were comprised as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
Noncurrent |
|
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and
government-related securities |
|
$ |
950 |
|
|
$ |
1,407 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Corporate bonds and notes |
|
|
3,852 |
|
|
|
3,988 |
|
|
|
1,376 |
|
|
|
1,204 |
|
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities |
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
821 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Auction rate securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
Non-investment-grade debt securities |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
3,138 |
|
|
|
2,719 |
|
Common and preferred stock |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
1,550 |
|
|
|
1,377 |
|
Equity mutual and exchange-traded funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
948 |
|
Debt mutual funds |
|
|
1,817 |
|
|
|
1,975 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,427 |
|
|
$ |
8,352 |
|
|
$ |
7,618 |
|
|
$ |
6,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 27, 2010, the contractual maturities of available-for-sale debt securities
were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years to Maturity |
|
|
No Single |
|
|
|
|
Less Than |
|
One to |
|
|
Five to |
|
|
Greater Than |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
|
|
One Year |
|
Five Years |
|
|
Ten Years |
|
|
Ten Years |
|
|
Date |
|
|
Total |
|
1,138 |
|
|
4,768 |
|
|
|
1,572 |
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
4,236 |
|
|
|
12,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities with no single maturity date included mortgage- and asset-backed securities,
auction rate securities, non-investment-grade debt securities and debt mutual funds.
The Company recorded realized gains and losses on sales of available-for-sale marketable
securities as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Realized |
|
|
Gross Realized |
|
|
Net Realized |
|
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Gains |
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 27, 2010 |
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
|
90 |
|
June 28, 2009 |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 27, 2010 |
|
$ |
289 |
|
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
|
272 |
|
June 28, 2009 |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
57 |
|
Available-for-sale securities were comprised as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
June 27, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
2,342 |
|
|
$ |
283 |
|
|
$ |
(78 |
) |
|
$ |
2,547 |
|
Debt securities |
|
|
12,061 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
12,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,403 |
|
|
$ |
770 |
|
|
$ |
(128 |
) |
|
$ |
15,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
2,282 |
|
|
$ |
340 |
|
|
$ |
(157 |
) |
|
$ |
2,465 |
|
Debt securities |
|
|
12,069 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
12,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,351 |
|
|
$ |
870 |
|
|
$ |
(196 |
) |
|
$ |
15,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
QUALCOMM Incorporated
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair values of the Companys
investments in individual securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position deemed
to be temporary for less than 12 months and for more than 12 months, aggregated by investment
category (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 27, 2010 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
More than 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
Corporate bonds and notes |
|
$ |
887 |
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Auction rate securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
Non-investment-grade debt securities |
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Common and preferred stock |
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Equity mutual and exchange-traded funds |
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt mutual funds |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,739 |
|
|
$ |
(105 |
) |
|
$ |
312 |
|
|
$ |
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27, 2009 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
More than 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
Corporate bonds and notes |
|
$ |
462 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Auction rate securities |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
Non-investment-grade debt securities |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Common and preferred stock |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
Equity mutual and exchange-traded funds |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
867 |
|
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
|
$ |
1,502 |
|
|
$ |
(171 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 27, 2010, the Company concluded that the unrealized losses were temporary.
Further, for common and preferred stock, equity mutual and exchange-traded funds and debt mutual
funds with unrealized losses, the Company has the ability and the intent to hold such securities
until they recover, which is expected to be within a reasonable period of time. For debt securities
with unrealized losses, the Company does not have the intent to sell, nor is it more likely than
not that the Company will be required to sell, such securities before recovery or maturity.
The following table shows the activity for the credit loss portion of other-than-temporary
impairments on debt securities held by the Company (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Beginning balance of credit losses |
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
$ |
170 |
|
Credit losses recognized on securities previously not impaired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Reductions in credit losses related to securities sold |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
Accretion of credit losses due to an increase in cash flows expected
to be collected |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance of credit losses |
|
$ |
124 |
|
|
$ |
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
QUALCOMM Incorporated
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 4 Composition of Certain Financial Statement Items
Accounts Receivable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Trade, net of allowances for doubtful
accounts of $2 and $4, respectively |
|
$ |
762 |
|
|
$ |
639 |
|
Long-term contracts |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Other |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
798 |
|
|
$ |
700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
446 |
|
|
$ |
453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible Assets. Gross technology-based intangible assets increased by $138 million
during the nine months ended June 27, 2010 primarily due to the assignment of certain patents to
the Company pursuant to a license agreement entered into in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The
estimated fair value of these patents was determined using the income approach.
Other Current Liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Customer-related liabilities, including incentives, rebates and other reserves |
|
$ |
648 |
|
|
$ |
461 |
|
Current portion of payable to Broadcom (Note 8) |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
Accrued liability to KFTC (Note 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
230 |
|
Payable for unsettled securities trades |
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
Other |
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,320 |
|
|
$ |
1,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 5 Investment Income (Loss), Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
June 28, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
June 28, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Interest and dividend income |
|
$ |
131 |
|
|
$ |
132 |
|
|
$ |
405 |
|
|
$ |
389 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
Net realized gains on marketable securities |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
Net realized gains on other investments |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment losses on marketable securities |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
(704 |
) |
Impairment losses on other investments |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
(Losses) gains on derivative instruments |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
Equity in earnings (losses) of investees |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
179 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
541 |
|
|
$ |
(296 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment losses on marketable securities for the nine months ended June 28, 2009 were
comprised of total
13
QUALCOMM Incorporated
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
other-than-temporary impairment losses of $712 million less $8 million related to the noncredit
portion of losses on debt securities recognized in other comprehensive income. The
other-than-temporary losses on marketable securities were generally caused by a disruption in U.S.
and foreign credit and financial markets that depressed securities values.
Note 6 Income Taxes
The Company currently estimates its annual effective income tax rate to be 20% for fiscal
2010, compared to the 23% effective income tax rate in fiscal 2009. The United States federal
research and development credit expired on December 31, 2009. Therefore, the Companys annual
effective tax rate for fiscal 2010 only reflects federal research and development credits generated
through December 31, 2009. The annual effective tax rate also includes tax expense of $130 million
that arises because deferred revenue related to the Companys 2008 license and settlement
agreements with Nokia is taxable in fiscal 2010 but the resulting deferred tax asset will reverse
in future years when the Companys state tax rate will be lower as a result of California tax
legislation enacted in fiscal 2009.
The estimated annual effective tax rate for fiscal 2010 of 20% is less than the United States
federal statutory rate primarily due to benefits of 22% related to foreign earnings taxed at less
than the United States federal rate, partially offset by state taxes of 5% and tax expense of 4%
related to the deferred revenue that is taxable in fiscal 2010, but for which the resulting
deferred tax asset will reverse in future years when the Companys state tax rate will be lower.
The prior fiscal year rate was lower than the United States federal statutory rate primarily due to
benefits related to foreign earnings taxed at less than the United States federal rate, adjustments
to prior year estimates of uncertain tax positions as a result of tax audits during the year and
the generation of research and development credits, partially offset by an increase in the
valuation allowance related to capital losses, the revaluation of deferred items and state taxes.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) completed its examination of the Companys tax return for
fiscal 2008 and issued a full acceptance letter for fiscal 2009 during the third quarter of fiscal 2010,
resulting in an increase to the tax provision of $20 million. The Company is no longer subject to
United States federal income tax examinations for years prior to fiscal 2009. The IRS is performing
a limited post-filing review of the 2009 tax return to ensure compliance with the agreed tax return
positions.
Note 7 Stockholders Equity
Changes in stockholders equity for the nine months ended June 27, 2010 were as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 27, 2009 |
|
$ |
20,316 |
|
Net income |
|
|
2,382 |
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
(59 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(2,893 |
) |
Net proceeds from the issuance of common stock |
|
|
516 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
456 |
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options |
|
|
29 |
|
Dividends |
|
|
(872 |
) |
Other |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 27, 2010 |
|
$ |
19,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Repurchase Program. During the three months and nine months ended June 27, 2010,
the Company repurchased and retired 32,388,000 and 76,259,000 shares of the Companys common stock,
respectively, for $1.2
billion and $2.9 billion, respectively. During the nine months ended June 28, 2009, the
Company repurchased and retired 8,920,000 shares of the Companys common stock for $284 million.
The Company did not repurchase any shares during the three months ended June 28, 2009. On March 1,
2010, the Company announced that it had been authorized to repurchase up to $3.0 billion of the
Companys common stock, and $1.8 billion of that amount remained available at June 27, 2010. The
stock repurchase program has no expiration date. Since June 27, 2010, the Company has repurchased
and retired 3,529,000 shares of the Companys common stock for $122 million.
Dividends. On March 1, 2010, the Company announced an increase in its quarterly cash dividend
per share of common stock from $0.17 to $0.19, which was effective for quarterly dividends payable
after March 28, 2010. On
14
QUALCOMM Incorporated
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
July 8, 2010, the Company announced a cash dividend of $0.19 per share on the Companys common
stock, payable on September 24, 2010 to stockholders of record as of August 27, 2010. Cash
dividends announced in the nine months ended June 27, 2010 and June 28, 2009 were as follows (in
millions, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Total |
|
First quarter |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
284 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
264 |
|
Second quarter |
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
Third quarter |
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
$ |
872 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8 Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation. Tessera, Inc. v. QUALCOMM Incorporated: On April 17, 2007, Tessera filed a patent
infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern Division of Texas and a
complaint with the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) pursuant to Section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930 against the Company and other companies, alleging infringement of two
patents relating to semiconductor packaging structures and seeking monetary damages and injunctive
and other relief. The District Court action is stayed pending resolution of the ITC proceeding,
including appeals. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Offices (USPTO) Central Reexamination Unit has
issued office actions rejecting all of the asserted patent claims on the grounds that they are
invalid in view of certain prior art and has made these rejections final. Tessera has appealed the
rejections to the Board of Appeals and Interferences. On December 1, 2008, the Administrative Law
Judge (ALJ) ruled that the patents are valid but not infringed. On May 20, 2009, however, the ITC
reversed the ALJs determination that the patents were not infringed, and it issued the following
remedial orders: (1) a limited exclusion order that bans the Company and the other named
respondents from importing into the United States the accused chip packages (except to the extent
those products are licensed) and (2) a cease and desist order that prohibits the Company from
engaging in certain domestic activities respecting those products. The President declined to review
the decision. The Company and other respondents have appealed. The ITC and the appeals court
declined to stay the ITCs decision pending appeal. The appellate briefing is complete and oral
arguments were held on June 9, 2010. The appeals court decision is expected within the next several
months. The Company has shifted supply of accused chips for the United States market to a licensed
supplier, Amkor. A licensed source of supply permits the Company to continue to supply the United
States market without interruption. The subject patents expire on September 24, 2010, at which time
the ITC orders will cease to be operative.
Korea Fair Trade Commission Complaint: Two U.S. companies (Texas Instruments and Broadcom) and
two South Korean companies (Nextreaming and Thin Multimedia) filed complaints with the Korea Fair
Trade Commission (KFTC) alleging that certain of the Companys business practices violate South
Korean antitrust regulations. As a result of its agreement with the Company, Broadcom withdrew its
complaint to the KFTC in May 2009. After a hearing, the KFTC announced its ruling via press release
in July 2009. On January 4, 2010, the KFTC issued its written decision, explaining its ruling that
the Company violated South Korean law by offering certain discounts and rebates for purchases of
its CDMA chips and for including in certain agreements language requiring the continued payment of
royalties after all licensed patents have expired. The KFTC levied a fine of 273.2 billion Korean
won, which was accrued in fiscal 2009 (Note 4) and paid in the second quarter of fiscal 2010, and
ordered the Company to cease the practices at issue. In February 2010, the Company filed a
complaint against the KFTC with the Seoul High Court appealing the KFTCs written decision. The
Company does not anticipate that the cease and desist remedies ordered will have a material effect
on the results of its operations. In July 2009, the KFTC also
announced that it would continue its review of the Companys integration of multimedia functions
into its chips, but it has not announced any decisions in that regard. The Company believes that
its practices do not violate South Korean competition law, are grounded in sound business practice
and are consistent with its customers desires.
Japan Fair Trade Commission Complaint: The Japan Fair Trade Commission (JFTC) received
unspecified complaints alleging that the Companys business practices are, in some way, a violation
of Japanese law. On September 29, 2009, the JFTC issued a cease and desist order (CDO) concluding
that the Companys Japanese licensees were forced to cross-license patents to the Company on a
royalty-free basis and were forced to accept a
15
QUALCOMM Incorporated
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
provision under which they agreed not to assert their essential patents against the Companys
other licensees who made a similar commitment in their license agreements with the Company. The CDO
seeks to require the Company to modify its existing license agreements with Japanese companies to
eliminate these provisions while preserving the license of the Companys patents to those
companies. The Company disagrees with the conclusions that it forced its Japanese licensees to
agree to any provision in the parties agreements and that those provisions violate Japans
Anti-Monopoly Act. The Company has invoked its right under Japanese law to an administrative
hearing before the JFTC. In February 2010, the Tokyo High Court granted the Companys motion and
issued a stay of the CDO pending the administrative hearing before the JFTC. The JFTC has had three
hearing days to date, with additional hearing days scheduled for August and October 2010.
Icera Complaint to the European Commission: On June 7, 2010, the European Commission (the
Commission) notified and provided the Company with a redacted copy of a complaint filed with the
Commission by Icera, Inc. alleging that the Company has engaged in anticompetitive activity. The
Company has been asked by the Commission to submit a preliminary response to the portions of the
Complaint disclosed to it, and the Company expects to submit its response in July 2010. The Company
will cooperate fully with the Commission.
Panasonic Arbitration: On August 5, 2009, Panasonic filed an arbitration demand alleging that
it does not owe royalties, or owes less royalties, on its WCDMA subscriber devices sold on or after
December 21, 2008, and that the Company breached the license agreement between the parties as well
as certain commitments to standards setting organizations. On January 31, 2010, Panasonic amended
the arbitration demand to include claims based on alleged misrepresentations and the Japanese
Antimonopoly Act and increased its claim for damages to include royalties it has paid on its WCDMA
subscriber devices sold prior to December 21, 2008. The arbitration demand seeks declaratory relief
regarding the amount of royalties due and payable by Panasonic, as well as the return of certain
royalties it had previously paid. The Company has responded to the arbitration demand, denying the
allegations and requesting judgment in its favor on all claims. The arbitration hearing will
proceed in phases. The first phase hearing began on July 12, 2010. Additional phases have not yet
been scheduled. Although the Company believes Panasonics claims are without merit, it has deferred
the recognition of revenue related to WCDMA subscriber unit royalties reported and paid by
Panasonic in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 and the first nine months of fiscal 2010.
Other: The Company has been named, along with many other manufacturers of wireless phones,
wireless operators and industry-related organizations, as a defendant in purported class action
lawsuits, and individually filed actions pending in federal court in Pennsylvania and Washington
D.C. superior court, seeking monetary damages arising out of its sale of cellular phones.
While there can be no assurance of favorable outcomes, the Company believes the claims made by
other parties in the foregoing matters are without merit and will vigorously defend the actions.
The Company has not recorded any accrual for contingent liabilities associated with the legal
proceedings described above based on the Companys belief that liabilities, while possible, are not
probable. Further, any possible range of loss cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. The
Company is engaged in numerous other legal actions not described above arising in the ordinary
course of its business and, while there can be no assurance, believes that the ultimate outcome of
these actions will not have a material adverse effect on its operating results, liquidity or
financial position.
Litigation Settlement, Patent License and Other Related Items. On April 26, 2009, the Company
entered into a Settlement and Patent License and Non-Assert Agreement with Broadcom. The Company
agreed to pay Broadcom $891 million, of which $373 million was paid through June 27, 2010, and the
remainder will be paid ratably through April 2013. The Company recorded a pre-tax charge of $783
million related to this agreement during fiscal 2009, including $748 million recorded in the second
quarter of fiscal 2009. At June 27, 2010, the carrying value of the liability was $495 million,
which also approximated the fair value of the contractual liability, net of imputed interest.
India Spectrum Acquisition and Related Debt. In June 2010, the Company won a 20 MHz slot of
Broadband Wireless Access (BWA) spectrum in four telecom circles in India as a result of the
completion of the BWA spectrum auction. The Company expects that licenses to operate wireless
networks on this spectrum will be assigned to the
Company by December 2010 with an initial license period of 20 years. At June 27, 2010, the
Company had a $1.06 billion advance payment included in noncurrent other assets related to this
spectrum. The Company will amortize the spectrum licenses over the remaining license period
commencing upon the commercial launch of wireless services in India, which is expected to occur
within five years of the assignment date. The Companys goal
16
QUALCOMM Incorporated
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
is to attract one or more operator partners into a venture (or ventures) for construction of
an LTE network in compliance with the Indian governments rollout requirement for the BWA spectrum,
and then to exit the venture(s). The manner and timing of such exit will be dependent upon a number
of factors, such as market conditions and regulatory considerations, among others.
In June 2010, in connection with the Indian BWA spectrum purchase, the Company entered into a
bank loan agreement that is denominated in Indian rupees. The loan is payable in full in December
2010. The loan has a fixed interest rate of 6.75% per year with interest payments due monthly. At
June 27, 2010, the carrying value of the loan was $1.06 billion, which approximated its fair value.
Indemnifications. In general, the Company does not agree to indemnify its customers and
licensees for losses sustained from infringement of third-party intellectual property. However, the
Company is contingently liable under certain product sales, services, license and other agreements
to indemnify certain customers against certain types of liability and/or damages arising from
qualifying claims of patent infringement by products or services sold or provided by the Company.
The Companys obligations under these agreements may be limited in terms of time and/or amount, and
in some instances, the Company may have recourse against third parties for certain payments made by
the Company. These indemnification arrangements are not initially measured and recognized at fair
value because they are deemed to be similar to product warranties in that they relate to claims
and/or other actions that could impair the ability of the Companys direct or indirect customers to
use the Companys products or services. Accordingly, the Company records liabilities resulting from
the arrangements when they are probable and can be reasonably estimated. Reimbursements under
indemnification arrangements have not been material to the Companys consolidated financial
statements. The Company has not recorded any accrual for contingent liabilities at June 27, 2010
associated with these indemnification arrangements, other than negligible amounts for reimbursement
of legal costs, based on the Companys belief that additional liabilities, while possible, are not
probable. Further, any possible range of loss cannot be estimated at this time.
Purchase Obligations. The Company has agreements with suppliers and other parties to purchase
inventory, other goods, services and long-lived assets. Noncancelable obligations under these
agreements at June 27, 2010 for the remainder of fiscal 2010 and for each of the subsequent four
years from fiscal 2011 through 2014 were $915 million, $365 million, $119 million, $42 million and
$15 million, respectively, and $86 million thereafter. Of these amounts, for the remainder of
fiscal 2010 and for fiscal 2011, commitments to purchase integrated circuit product inventories
comprised $809 million and $136 million, respectively.
Leases. The Company leases certain of its facilities and equipment under noncancelable
operating leases, with terms ranging from less than one year to 35 years and with provisions in
certain leases for cost-of-living increases. The Company leases certain property under capital
lease agreements that expire at various dates through 2043. Capital lease obligations are included
in other liabilities. The future minimum lease payments for all capital leases and operating leases
at June 27, 2010 were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leases |
|
|
Leases |
|
|
Total |
|
Remainder of fiscal 2010 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
2011 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
2012 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
2013 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
2014 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments |
|
$ |
508 |
|
|
$ |
476 |
|
|
$ |
984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct: Amounts representing interest |
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of minimum lease payments |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct: Current portion of capital lease obligations |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion of capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
QUALCOMM Incorporated
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 9 Segment Information
The Company is organized on the basis of products and services. The Company aggregates four of
its divisions into the Qualcomm Wireless & Internet segment. Reportable segments are as follows:
|
|
|
Qualcomm CDMA Technologies (QCT) develops and supplies integrated circuits and
system software for wireless voice and data communications, multimedia functions and
global positioning system products based on its CDMA technology and other technologies; |
|
|
|
|
Qualcomm Technology Licensing (QTL) grants licenses to use portions of the
Companys intellectual property portfolio, which includes certain patent rights
essential to and/or useful in the manufacture and sale of certain wireless products,
including, without limitation, products implementing cdmaOne, CDMA2000, WCDMA, CDMA TDD
(including TD-SCDMA), GSM/GPRS/EDGE and/or OFDMA standards and their derivatives, and
collects license fees and royalties in partial consideration for such licenses; |
|
|
|
|
Qualcomm Wireless & Internet (QWI) comprised of: |
|
|
|
Qualcomm Internet Services (QIS) provides content enablement
services for the wireless industry and push-to-talk and other products and
services for wireless network operators; |
|
|
|
|
Qualcomm Government Technologies (QGOV) provides development,
hardware and analytical expertise to United States government agencies involving
wireless communications technologies; |
|
|
|
|
Qualcomm Enterprise Services (QES) provides satellite- and
terrestrial-based two-way data messaging, position reporting, wireless
application services and managed data services to transportation and logistics
companies and other enterprise companies; and |
|
|
|
|
Firethorn builds and manages software applications that enable
financial institutions and wireless operators to offer mobile commerce services. |
|
|
|
Qualcomm Strategic Initiatives (QSI) manages the Companys strategic investment
activities, including FLO TV Incorporated (FLO TV), the Companys wholly-owned wireless
multimedia operator subsidiary. QSI makes strategic investments in early stage companies
and in wireless spectrum, such as the BWA spectrum recently won in the auction in India,
that the Company believes will open new markets for CDMA and OFDMA technologies, support
the design and introduction of new CDMA and OFDMA products or possess unique
capabilities or technology. |
The Company evaluates the performance of its segments based on earnings (loss) before income
taxes (EBT). EBT includes the allocation of certain corporate expenses to the segments, including
depreciation and amortization expense related to unallocated corporate assets. Certain income and
charges are not allocated to segments in the Companys management reports because they are not
considered in evaluating the segments operating performance. Unallocated income and charges
include certain investment income (loss), certain share-based compensation and certain research and
development expenses and marketing expenses that were deemed to be not directly related to the
businesses of the segments. The table below presents revenues and EBT for reportable segments (in
millions):
18
QUALCOMM Incorporated
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
QCT |
|
|
QTL |
|
|
QWI |
|
|
QSI |
|
|
Items |
|
|
Total |
|
For the three months ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 27, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
1,691 |
|
|
$ |
847 |
|
|
$ |
162 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,706 |
|
EBT |
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
971 |
|
June 28, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
1,786 |
|
|
$ |
807 |
|
|
$ |
148 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
2,753 |
|
EBT |
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 27, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
4,835 |
|
|
$ |
2,738 |
|
|
$ |
456 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
8,039 |
|
EBT |
|
|
1,173 |
|
|
|
2,266 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
2,988 |
|
June 28, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
4,436 |
|
|
$ |
2,769 |
|
|
$ |
494 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
7,726 |
|
EBT |
|
|
933 |
|
|
|
2,376 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(266 |
) |
|
|
(1,734 |
) |
|
|
1,334 |
|
Reconciling items in the previous table were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
June 28, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
June 28, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elimination of intersegment revenue |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
Other nonreportable segments |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (losses) before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated cost of equipment and services revenues |
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
(30 |
) |
|
$ |
(30 |
) |
Unallocated research and development expenses |
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
(283 |
) |
Unallocated selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(218 |
) |
|
|
(220 |
) |
Unallocated litigation settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(748 |
) |
Unallocated investment income (loss), net |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
535 |
|
|
|
(297 |
) |
Other nonreportable segments |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
(152 |
) |
Intracompany eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items |
|
$ |
(71 |
) |
|
$ |
(158 |
) |
|
$ |
(182 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,734 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months and nine months ended June 27, 2010, unallocated research and
development expenses included $74 million and $221 million, respectively, and unallocated selling,
general and administrative expenses included $65 million and $202 million, respectively, of
share-based compensation expense. During the three months and nine months ended June 28, 2009,
unallocated research and development expenses included $72 million and $209 million, respectively,
and unallocated selling, general and administrative expenses included $68 million and $197 million,
respectively, of share-based compensation expense. Unallocated cost of equipment and services
revenues was comprised entirely of share-based compensation expense.
Revenues from external customers and intersegment revenues were as follows (in millions):
19
QUALCOMM Incorporated
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QCT |
|
|
QTL |
|
|
QWI |
|
|
QSI |
|
For the three months ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 27, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
1,691 |
|
|
$ |
847 |
|
|
$ |
162 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 28, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
1,784 |
|
|
$ |
807 |
|
|
$ |
147 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 27, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
4,828 |
|
|
$ |
2,738 |
|
|
$ |
456 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 28, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
4,430 |
|
|
$ |
2,767 |
|
|
$ |
491 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment revenues are based on prevailing market rates for substantially similar
products and services or an approximation thereof, but the purchasing segment may record the cost
of revenues at the selling segments original cost. The elimination of the selling segments gross
margin is included with other intersegment eliminations in reconciling items.
Segment assets are comprised of accounts receivable, finance receivables and inventories for
QCT, QTL and QWI. The QSI segment assets include certain marketable securities, notes receivable,
spectrum licenses, other investments and all assets of QSI consolidated subsidiaries, including FLO
TV. QSI segment assets increased primarily as a result of the advance payment made in June 2010
related to the BWA spectrum recently won in the India auction. QSI assets related to the FLO TV
business totaled $1.3 billion at both June 27, 2010 and September 27, 2009. Reconciling items for
total assets included $390 million and $389 million at June 27, 2010 and September 27, 2009,
respectively, of property, plant and equipment, goodwill and other assets related to the Qualcomm
MEMS Technologies division, a nonreportable segment developing display technology for mobile
devices and other applications. Total segment assets differ from total assets on a consolidated
basis as a result of unallocated corporate assets primarily comprised of certain cash, cash
equivalents, marketable securities, property, plant and equipment, deferred tax assets, goodwill
and other intangible assets of nonreportable segments. Segment assets and reconciling items were as
follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
September 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
QCT |
|
$ |
1,059 |
|
|
$ |
892 |
|
QTL |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
QWI |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
QSI |
|
|
2,726 |
|
|
|
1,614 |
|
Reconciling items |
|
|
25,453 |
|
|
|
24,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated assets |
|
$ |
29,401 |
|
|
$ |
27,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This information should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial
statements and the notes thereto included in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report and the
audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the year ended September 27, 2009
contained in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
In addition to historical information, the following discussion contains forward-looking
statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ substantially
from those referred to herein due to a number of factors, including but not limited to risks
described in the section entitled Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report.
Overview
Recent Developments
Revenues of $2.7 billion and net income of $767 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2010
were impacted by the following key items:
|
|
|
We shipped approximately 103 million Mobile Station Modem (MSM) integrated circuits
for CDMA-based wireless devices, an increase of 10%, compared to approximately 94
million MSM integrated circuits in the year ago quarter. |
|
|
|
Total reported device sales were approximately $25.2 billion, an increase of
approximately 19%, compared to approximately $21.2 billion in the year ago quarter.
(1) |
Against this backdrop, the following recent developments occurred during the third quarter of
fiscal 2010 with respect to key elements of our business or our industry:
|
|
|
Worldwide wireless subscribers grew by approximately 4% to reach approximately 5.0
billion.(2) |
|
|
|
Worldwide 3G subscribers (all CDMA-based) grew to approximately 1.09 billion,
approximately 22% of total wireless subscribers, including approximately 500 million
CDMA2000 1X/1xEV-DO subscribers and approximately 585 million WCDMA/HSPA/TD-SCDMA
subscribers. (2) |
|
|
|
In the handset market, CDMA-based unit shipments grew an estimated 29%
year-over-year, compared to an estimated increase of 19% year-over-year across all
technologies. (3) |
|
|
|
In June 2010, we won a 20 MHz slot of Broadband Wireless Access (BWA) spectrum in
four telecom circles in India as a result of the completion of the BWA spectrum auction
for $1.1 billion. We entered the BWA auction to facilitate the deployment of LTE
technology as a complement to the existing 3G HSPA and EV-DO networks in India. |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total reported device sales is the sum of all reported sales in U.S.
dollars (as reported to us by our licensees) of all licensed CDMA-based subscriber devices
(including handsets, modules, modem cards and other subscriber devices) by our licensees
during a particular period. Not all licensees report sales the same (e.g., some licensees
report sales net of permitted deductions, such as transportation, insurance and packing
costs, while other licensees report sales and then identify the amount of permitted
deductions in their reports), and the way in which licensees report such information may
change from time to time. |
|
(2) |
|
According to Wireless Intelligence estimates as of July 19, 2010, for the
quarter ending June 30, 2010. Wireless Intelligence estimates for CDMA2000 1X/1xEV-DO
subscribers do not include Wireless Local Loop. |
|
(3) |
|
Based on current reports by Strategy Analytics, a global research and
consulting firm, in their May 2010 Global Handset Market Share Update. |
Our Business and Operating Segments
We design, manufacture, have manufactured on our behalf and market digital wireless
telecommunications products and services based on our CDMA technology and other technologies. We
derive revenues principally from sales of integrated circuit products, license fees and royalties
for use of our intellectual property, messaging and other services and related hardware sales,
software development and licensing and related services, software hosting services and services
related to delivery of multimedia content. Operating expenses primarily consist of cost of
equipment and services, research and development and selling, general and administrative expenses.
21
We conduct business primarily through four reportable segments. These segments are: Qualcomm
CDMA Technologies, or QCT; Qualcomm Technology Licensing, or QTL; Qualcomm Wireless & Internet, or
QWI; and Qualcomm Strategic Initiatives, or QSI.
QCT is a leading developer and supplier of CDMA-based integrated circuits and system software
for wireless voice and data communications, multimedia functions and global positioning system
products. QCTs integrated circuit products and system software are used in wireless devices,
particularly mobile phones, laptops, data modules, handheld wireless computers, data cards and
infrastructure equipment. The integrated circuits for wireless devices include the Mobile Station
Modem (MSM), Mobile Data Modem (MDM), Qualcomm Single Chip (QSC), Qualcomm Snapdragon (QSD), Radio
Frequency (RF), Power Management (PM) and Bluetooth devices. These integrated circuits for wireless
devices and system software perform voice and data communication, multimedia and global positioning
functions, radio conversion between RF and baseband signals, power management and peripheral
connectivity. QCTs system software enables the other device components to interface with the
integrated circuit products and is the foundation software enabling equipment manufacturers to
develop devices utilizing the functionality within the integrated circuits. The infrastructure
equipment integrated circuits and system software perform the core baseband CDMA modem
functionality in the wireless operators base station equipment. QCT revenues comprised 62% and 65%
of total consolidated revenues in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively, and 60%
and 57% of total consolidated revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
QCT utilizes a fabless production business model, which means that we do not own or operate
foundries for the production of silicon wafers from which our integrated circuits are made.
Integrated circuits are die cut from silicon wafers that have completed the assembly and final test
manufacturing processes. We rely on independent third-party suppliers to perform the manufacturing
and assembly, and most of the testing, of our integrated circuits. Our suppliers are also
responsible for the procurement of most of the raw materials used in the production of our
integrated circuits. We employ both turnkey and two-stage manufacturing business models to purchase
our integrated circuits. Turnkey is when our foundry suppliers are responsible for delivering fully
assembled and tested integrated circuits. Under the two-stage manufacturing business model, we
purchase die from semiconductor manufacturing foundries and contract with separate third-party
manufacturers for back-end assembly and test services. We refer to this two-stage manufacturing
business model as Integrated Fabless Manufacturing (IFM).
QTL grants licenses to use portions of our intellectual property portfolio, which includes
certain patent rights essential to and/or useful in the manufacture and sale of certain wireless
products, including, without limitation, products implementing cdmaOne, CDMA2000, WCDMA, CDMA TDD
(including TD-SCDMA), GSM/GPRS/EDGE and/or OFDMA standards and their derivatives. QTL receives
license fees as well as ongoing royalties based on worldwide sales by licensees of products
incorporating or using our intellectual property. License fees are fixed amounts paid in one or
more installments. Ongoing royalties are generally based upon a percentage of the wholesale (i.e.,
licensees) selling price of licensed products, net of certain permissible deductions (e.g.,
certain shipping costs, packing costs, VAT, etc.). QTL revenues comprised 31% and 29% of total
consolidated revenues in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively, and 34% and 36%
of total consolidated revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively. The
vast majority of such revenues were generated through our licensees sales of cdmaOne, CDMA2000 and
WCDMA subscriber equipment products.
QWI, which includes Qualcomm Enterprise Services (QES), Qualcomm Internet Services (QIS),
Qualcomm Government Technologies (QGOV) and Firethorn, generates revenues primarily through mobile
information products and services and software and software development aimed at support and
delivery of wireless applications. QES sells equipment, software and services used by
transportation and other companies to connect wirelessly with their assets and workforce. Through
June 2010, QES has shipped approximately 1,395,000 terrestrial-based and satellite-based mobile
information units. QIS provides content enablement services for the wireless industry, including
BREW (Binary Runtime Environment for Wireless), the Plaza suite and other services. QIS also
provides QChat push-to-talk, QPoint and other products for wireless network operators. QGOV
provides development, hardware and analytical expertise involving wireless communications
technologies to United States government agencies. Firethorn builds and manages software
applications that enable financial institutions and wireless operators to offer mobile commerce
services. QWI revenues comprised 6% and 5% of total consolidated revenues in the third quarter of
fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively, and 6% of total consolidated revenues for the first nine months
of both fiscal 2010 and 2009.
22
QSI manages the Companys strategic investment activities, including FLO TV Incorporated (FLO
TV), our wholly-owned wireless multimedia operator subsidiary. QSI makes strategic investments in
early stage companies, including licensed device manufacturers, and in wireless spectrum, such as
the BWA spectrum recently won in the auction in India, that we believe will open new markets for
CDMA and OFDMA technologies, support the design and introduction of new CDMA and OFDMA products or
possess unique capabilities or technology. Our FLO TV subsidiary offers its service over our
nationwide multicast network based on our MediaFLO Media Distribution System (MDS) and MediaFLO
technology, which leverages the Forward Link Only (FLO) air interface standard. This network is
utilized as a shared resource for wireless operators and their customers in the United States. The
commercial availability of the FLO TV network and service on wireless operator devices will
continue, in part, to be determined by our wireless operator partners. FLO TVs network uses the
700 MHz spectrum for which we hold licenses nationwide. Additionally, FLO TV has and will continue
to procure, aggregate and distribute content in service packages, which we will continue to make
available on a wholesale basis to our wireless operator customers (whether they operate on CDMA,
WCDMA or GSM) in the United States. In November 2009, FLO TV began to offer the FLO TV service on a
subscription basis directly to consumers in the United States. FLO TV currently provides the
services for use in personal television devices and automotive devices and plans to make it
available in other portable device accessories in the future. These devices are sold through
various retail and distribution channels. We are evaluating the FLO TV business model, including
sale to, or joint venture with, a third party and/or alternative use of the spectrum licenses,
technology and network assets, if we do not achieve adequate consumer acceptance of our FLO TV
service offerings in the United States or based on other factors. As part of our strategic
investment activities, we intend to pursue various exit strategies at some point in the future,
which may include distribution of our ownership interest in FLO TV to our stockholders in a
spin-off transaction.
Nonreportable segments include: the Qualcomm MEMS Technologies division, which is developing
an interferometric modulator (IMOD) display technology based on micro-electro-mechanical-system
(MEMS) structure combined with thin film optics; the MediaFLO Technologies division, comprised of
the FLO Technology group, which is developing our MediaFLO MDS and MediaFLO technology, and the FLO
International group, which markets MediaFLO for deployment outside of the United States; and other
product initiatives.
Looking Forward
The deployment of 3G networks enables increased voice capacity and higher data rates, thereby
supporting more minutes of use and a range of mobile broadband data applications for handsets, 3G
connected computing devices and other consumer electronics. Data applications include broadband
connectivity, streaming video, location-based services, mobile social networking and multimedia
messaging. As a result, we expect continued growth in the coming years in consumer demand for 3G
products and services around the world. As we look forward to the next several months, the
following items are likely to have an impact on our business:
|
|
|
The worldwide transition to 3G CDMA-based networks is expected to continue. With the
recently completed auction of 3G spectrum in India, we look forward to network launches
and expansion of 3G in that region along with the continued expansion of 3G in China. In
addition, we expect to partner with one or more operators in a venture (or ventures) for
construction of an LTE network in India in compliance with the Indian governments
rollout requirement for the BWA spectrum, and then to exit the venture(s). The manner
and timing of such exit will be dependent upon a number of factors, such as market
conditions and regulatory conditions, among others. LTE can operate seamlessly in
conjunction with 3G HSPA or EV-DO on a wireless network. |
|
|
|
|
We expect that CDMA-based device prices will continue to segment into high and low
end due to high volumes and active competition throughout the world. This,
along with a tempered economic recovery in developed regions combined with relative
strength at the lower end of the overall market, including certain data-centric devices,
is expected to continue to impact the average selling price of CDMA-based devices. |
|
|
|
|
We expect consumer demand for advanced 3G-based devices, including smartphones, data
devices and new device categories, such as eBook readers and tablets, to continue at a
strong pace. We also expect growth in low-end 3G devices as 3G expands in emerging
markets. |
23
|
|
|
We intend to continue to invest significant resources toward the development of
technology to increase the data rates available with 3G and 4G networks, wireless
baseband chips, converged computing/communication chips, multimedia products, software
and services for the wireless industry. |
|
|
|
|
We expect demand for cost-effective wireless devices to continue to grow and have
developed a family of Qualcomm Single Chip (QSC) products, which integrate the baseband,
radio frequency and power management functions into a single chip or package, lowering
component counts and enabling faster time-to-market for our customers. We still face
significant competition in the lower-end market from GSM-based products, particularly in
emerging markets. |
|
|
|
|
We expect demand for data-centric smartphone and smartbook devices to continue to
grow and have developed the Snapdragon platform of chipset products, which integrate the
baseband and a low-power, high-performance microprocessor into a single chip or package,
enabling our customers to develop computing-centric devices that also offer a full range
of wireless connectivity capabilities. We face significant competition in this market,
particularly from competing chipset suppliers providing non-integrated basebands or
application processors. |
|
|
|
|
We expect to continue to invest in the evolution of CDMA and a broad range of other
technologies, such as LTE, our FLO TV mobile television service, our IMOD display
technology and our Snapdragon platform, as part of our vision to enable a wide range of
products and technologies. |
In addition to the foregoing business and market-based matters, the following items are likely
to have an impact on our business and results of operations over the next several months:
|
|
|
We expect to continue to devote resources to working with and educating participants
in the wireless value chain as to the benefits of our business model in promoting a
highly competitive and innovative wireless market. However, we expect that certain
companies may continue to be dissatisfied with the need to pay reasonable royalties for
the use of our technology and not welcome the success of our business model in enabling
new, highly cost-effective competitors to their products. We expect that such companies
will continue to challenge our business model in various forums throughout the world. |
|
|
|
|
We have been and will continue evaluating and providing reasonable assistance to our
customers. This includes, in some cases, certain levels of financial support to minimize
the impact of litigation in which we or our customers may become involved. |
Further discussion of risks related to our business is presented in the Risk Factors included
in this Quarterly Report.
Third Quarter of Fiscal 2010 Compared to Third Quarter of Fiscal 2009
Revenues. Total revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 were $2.71 billion, compared to
$2.75 billion for the third quarter of fiscal 2009. Revenues from sales of equipment and services
for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 were $1.77 billion, compared to $1.86 billion for the third
quarter of fiscal 2009. The decrease in revenues from sales of equipment and services was primarily
due to a $99 million decrease in QCT revenues. Revenues from licensing and royalty fees for the
third quarter of fiscal 2010 were $934 million, compared to $891 million for the third quarter of
fiscal 2009. The increase in revenues from licensing and royalty fees was primarily due to a $40
million increase in QTL revenues.
Cost of Equipment and Services. Cost of equipment and services revenues for the third quarter
of fiscal 2010 was $905 million, compared to $864 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2009.
Cost of equipment and services revenues as a percentage of equipment and services revenues was 51%
for the third quarter of fiscal 2010, compared to 46% for the third quarter of fiscal 2009. The
decrease in margin percentage was primarily attributable to a decrease in QCT gross margin
percentage and the effect of an increase in costs related to our FLO TV subsidiary and Qualcomm
MEMS Technologies division. Cost of equipment and services revenues included $10 million in
share-based compensation in the third quarter of fiscal 2010, compared to $11 million for the third
quarter of fiscal 2009. Cost of equipment and services revenues as a percentage of equipment and
services revenues may fluctuate in future quarters depending on the mix of products sold and
services provided, competitive pricing, new product introduction costs and other factors.
24
Research and Development Expenses. For the third quarter of fiscal 2010, research and
development expenses were $649 million or 24% of revenues, compared to $618 million or 22% of
revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2009. The dollar increase is primarily attributable to a
$36 million increase in costs related to the development of integrated circuit products, next
generation CDMA and OFDMA technologies and other initiatives to support the acceleration of
advanced wireless products and services, including lower-cost devices, the integration of wireless
with consumer electronics and computing, the convergence of multiband, multimode, multinetwork
products and technologies, third-party operating systems and services platforms. Research and
development expenses for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 included share-based compensation of $74
million, compared to $72 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2009.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. For the third quarter of fiscal 2010, selling,
general and administrative expenses were $360 million or 13% of revenues, compared to $377 million
or 14% of revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2009. The dollar decrease was primarily
attributable to a $62 million gain on the sale of our Australia spectrum license, partially offset
by an $18 million increase in patent-related costs, a $13 million increase in selling and marketing
expenses primarily related to our FLO TV subsidiary and a $10 million increase in employee-related
expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the third quarter of fiscal 2010
included share-based compensation of $65 million, compared to $68 million in the third quarter of
fiscal 2009.
Net Investment Income. Net investment income was $179 million for the third quarter of fiscal
2010, compared to $90 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2009. The net increase was comprised
as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
June 28, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
Interest and dividend income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other segments |
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
QSI |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Net realized gains on investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other segments |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
QSI |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Net impairment losses on investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other segments |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
84 |
|
QSI |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
Losses on derivative instruments |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
Equity in earnings (losses) of investees |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
179 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the third quarter of fiscal 2010, we recorded lower impairment losses on
marketable securities, compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2009. Depressed security values
caused by a major disruption in the United States and foreign financial markets impacted our
results in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 and continued to cause impairment losses in the third
quarter of fiscal 2010, but to a lesser extent.
Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense was $204 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2010,
compared to $247 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2009. The effective tax rate for the third
quarter of fiscal 2010 was 21%, as compared to 25% for the third quarter of fiscal 2009. The
effective tax rate for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 was lower than the effective tax rate for
the third quarter of fiscal 2009 primarily as a result of a valuation allowance recorded in fiscal
2009 associated with net capital losses.
First Nine Months of Fiscal 2010 Compared to First Nine Months of Fiscal 2009
Revenues. Total revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2010 were $8.04 billion, compared
to $7.73 billion for the first nine months of fiscal 2009. Revenues from two customers of our QCT
and QTL segments (each of whom accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated revenues for the
period) comprised 26% and 30% in aggregate of total consolidated revenues in the first nine months
of fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively. Revenues from sales of equipment and services for the first
nine months of fiscal 2010 were $5.03 billion, compared to $4.70 billion for the first nine months
of fiscal 2009. The increase in revenues from sales of equipment and services was
25
primarily due to a $380 million increase in QCT revenues, partially offset by a $30 million
decrease in QWI revenues. Revenues from licensing and royalty fees for the first nine months of
fiscal 2010 were $3.01 billion, compared to $3.03 billion for the first nine months of fiscal 2009.
The decrease in revenues from licensing and royalty fees was primarily due to a $29 million
decrease in QTL revenues.
Cost of Equipment and Services. Cost of equipment and services revenues for the first nine
months of fiscal 2010 was $2.53 billion, compared to $2.36 billion for the first nine months of
fiscal 2009. Cost of equipment and services revenues as a percentage of equipment and services
revenues was 50% for the first nine months of both fiscal 2010 and 2009. The margin percentage
remained flat in the first nine months of fiscal 2010 as compared to the first nine months of
fiscal 2009 primarily due to an increase in QCT gross margin percentage that was offset by the
effect of increases in costs related to our FLO TV subsidiary and Qualcomm MEMS Technologies
division. Cost of equipment and services revenues in the first nine months of both fiscal 2010 and
2009 included $30 million in share-based compensation.
Research and Development Expenses. For the first nine months of fiscal 2010, research and
development expenses were $1.89 billion or 24% of revenues, compared to $1.83 billion or 24% of
revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2009. The dollar increase was primarily attributable
to a $96 million increase in costs related to the development of integrated circuit products, next
generation CDMA and OFDMA technologies and other initiatives to support the acceleration of
advanced wireless products and services, including lower-cost devices, the integration of wireless
with consumer electronics and computing, the convergence of multiband, multimode, multinetwork
products and technologies, third-party operating systems and services platforms. This increase in
research and development expenses was partially offset by decreases in development costs related to
other products and services, including a $17 million decrease related to the development of our QES
division asset-tracking products and services. Research and development expenses in the first nine
months of fiscal 2010 included share-based compensation of $221 million, compared to $209 million
in the first nine months of fiscal 2009.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
were $1.17 billion or 15% of revenues for the first nine months of both fiscal 2010 and 2009.
Selling, general and administrative expenses remained flat primarily as a result of a $62 million
gain on the sale of our Australia spectrum license and a $33 million decrease in costs related to
litigation and other legal matters, partially offset by a $44 million increase in patent-related
costs and a $41 million increase in selling and marketing expenses primarily related to our FLO TV
subsidiary. Selling, general and administrative expenses in the first nine months of fiscal 2010
included share-based compensation of $202 million, compared to $197 million in the first nine
months of fiscal 2009.
Litigation Settlement, Patent License and Other Related Items. The first nine months of fiscal
2009 operating expenses included a $748 million litigation settlement charge related to the
Settlement and Patent License and Non-Assert Agreement with Broadcom, which resulted in the
dismissal with prejudice of all litigation between the companies.
Net Investment Income (Loss). Net investment income was $541 million for the first nine months
of fiscal 2010, compared to a net investment loss of $296 million for the first nine months of
fiscal 2009. The net change was comprised as follows (in millions):
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
June 28, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
Interest and dividend income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other segments |
|
$ |
401 |
|
|
$ |
387 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
QSI |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
Net realized gains on investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other segments |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
QSI |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Net impairment losses on investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other segments |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
(699 |
) |
|
|
605 |
|
QSI |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
(Losses) gains on derivative instruments |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Equity in losses of investees |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
541 |
|
|
$ |
(296 |
) |
|
$ |
837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the first nine months of fiscal 2010, we recorded lower impairment losses on
marketable securities and higher net realized gains on corporate investments, compared to the first
nine months of fiscal 2009. Depressed securities values caused by a major disruption in United
States and foreign financial markets impacted our results in the first nine months of fiscal 2009
and continued to cause impairment losses in the first nine months of fiscal 2010, but to a lesser
extent.
Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense was $606 million for the first nine months of fiscal
2010, compared to $544 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2009. The effective tax rate was
20% for the first nine months of fiscal 2010, compared to 41% for the first nine months of fiscal
2009. The effective tax rate for the first nine months of fiscal 2010 is lower than the effective
tax rate for the first nine months of fiscal 2009 primarily as a result of a $748 million pre-tax
litigation settlement charge recorded in fiscal 2009 that had a discrete tax benefit computed at a
rate less than the United States federal rate, a valuation allowance recorded in fiscal 2009 on the
deferred tax asset related to capital assets and the revaluation in fiscal 2009 of net deferred tax
assets related to changes in California tax legislation enacted in fiscal 2009.
The annual effective tax rate for fiscal 2010 is estimated to be 20% and only reflects the
United States federal research and development credits generated through December 21, 2009, the
date on which they expired. The estimated annual effective tax rate for fiscal 2010 of 20% is less
than the United States federal statutory rate primarily due to benefits of 22% related to foreign
earnings taxed at less than the United States federal rate, partially offset by state taxes of 5%
and tax expense of 4% related to the deferred revenue that is taxable in fiscal 2010, but for which
the resulting deferred tax asset will reverse in future years when the Companys state tax rate
will be lower.
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance, increased from September 27, 2009 to June 27,
2010 primarily due to the establishment of the deferred tax asset related to revenue derived from
the Companys 2008 license and settlement agreements with Nokia.
Our Segment Results for the Third Quarter of Fiscal 2010 Compared to the Third Quarter of Fiscal
2009
The following should be read in conjunction with the third quarter financial results of fiscal
2010 for each reporting segment. See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 9
Segment Information.
QCT Segment. QCT revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 were $1.69 billion, compared to
$1.79 billion for the third quarter of fiscal 2009. Equipment and services revenues, mostly related
to sales of MSM and accompanying RF and PM integrated circuits, were $1.64 billion for the third
quarter of fiscal 2010, compared to $1.74 billion for the third quarter of fiscal 2009. The
decrease in equipment and services revenues resulted primarily from a decrease of $186 million
related to the net effects of changes in product mix and the average selling prices of such
products, partially offset by a $92 million increase related to higher unit shipments.
Approximately 103 million MSM integrated circuits were sold during the third quarter of fiscal
2010, compared to approximately 94 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2009.
27
QCTs earnings before taxes for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 were $404 million, compared
to $548 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2009. QCT operating income as a percentage of its
revenues (operating margin percentage) was 24% in the third quarter of fiscal 2010, compared to 31%
in the third quarter of fiscal 2009. The decrease in QCT earnings before taxes was primarily
attributable to the decrease in QCT revenues and a $38 million increase in research and development
expenses. The decrease in operating margin percentage was primarily due to an increase in research
and development expenses as a percentage of QCT revenues and a decrease in gross margin percentage.
QCT gross margin percentage decreased as a result of the net effects of lower average selling
prices, a decrease in average unit costs and lower product support costs.
QTL Segment. QTL revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 were $847 million, compared to
$807 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2009. The $40 million increase in revenues was
primarily due to an increase in sales of CDMA-based devices by licensees, partially offset by lower
royalties per unit of such CDMA-based devices, including the effect of underreported royalties by a
licensee and the deferral of revenue due to an on-going arbitration with Panasonic. QTL earnings
before taxes for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 were $673 million,
compared to $663 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2009. QTL operating margin percentage was
80% in the third quarter of fiscal 2010, compared to 83% in the third quarter of fiscal 2009. The
increase in QTL earnings before taxes was primarily attributable to the increase in QTL revenues,
partially offset by an increase in costs related to patents and to litigation and other legal
matters, which caused a corresponding decline in operating margin percentage.
QWI Segment. QWI revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 were $162 million, compared to
$148 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2009. Revenues increased primarily due to a $16
million increase in QES equipment and services revenues resulting primarily from higher unit
shipments of our asset-tracking products. QWI earnings before taxes for the third quarter of fiscal
2010 were $6 million, compared to a $3 million loss before taxes for the third quarter of fiscal
2009. QWI operating margin percentage was 2% in the third quarter of fiscal 2010, compared to
negative 2% in the third quarter of fiscal 2009. The increase in QWI earnings before taxes was
primarily attributable to decreases in QES and QIS research and development expenses. The increase
in operating margin percentage was attributable to both the effect of the decrease in research and
development expenses and lower ongoing operating losses of Firethorn, partially offset by a
decrease in QES gross margin percentage.
QSI Segment. QSI revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 were $6 million, compared to $9
million for the third quarter of fiscal 2009. QSI revenues are attributable to our FLO TV
subsidiary. The decrease in FLO TV revenues was primarily due to lower service-related revenues.
QSI loss before taxes for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 was $41 million, compared to $66 million
for the third quarter of fiscal 2009. QSIs loss before taxes decreased by $25 million primarily
due to a $62 million gain on the sale of our Australia spectrum license, partially offset by a $30
million increase in our FLO TV subsidiarys loss before taxes.
Our Segment Results for the First Nine Months of Fiscal 2010 Compared to the First Nine Months of
Fiscal 2009
The following should be read in conjunction with the first nine months financial results of
fiscal 2010 for each reporting segment. See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements,
Note 9 Segment Information.
QCT Segment. QCT revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2010 were $4.84 billion,
compared to $4.44 billion for the first nine months of fiscal 2009. Equipment and services
revenues, mostly related to sales of MSM and accompanying RF and PM integrated circuits, were $4.66
billion for the first nine months of fiscal 2010, compared to $4.29 billion for the first nine
months of fiscal 2009. The increase in equipment and services revenues resulted primarily from a
$900 million increase related to higher unit shipments, partially offset by a decrease of $527
million related to the net effects of changes in product mix and the average selling prices of such
products. Approximately 288 million MSM integrated circuits were sold during the first nine months
of fiscal 2010, compared to approximately 226 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2009. The
chipset volume in the first nine months of fiscal 2009 was impacted by the slowdown in the
worldwide economy that caused contraction in the CDMA-based channel inventory and resulted in lower
demand for CDMA-based MSM integrated chips.
QCTs earnings before taxes for the first nine months of fiscal 2010 were $1.17 billion,
compared to $933 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2009. QCTs operating income as a
percentage of its revenues (operating margin percentage) was 24% in the first nine months of fiscal
2010, compared to 21% in the first nine months of fiscal 2009. The increase in QCT earnings before
taxes was primarily attributable to the increase in QCT revenues,
28
partially offset by an increase
in research and development expenses. The increase in operating margin percentage was primarily due
to an increase in gross margin percentage and decreases in research and development and selling,
general and administrative expenses as a percentage of QCT revenues driven primarily by the
increase in QCT revenues. QCT gross margin percentage increased as a result of the net effects of a
decrease in average unit costs and lower average selling prices.
QTL Segment. QTL revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2010 were $2.74 billion,
compared to $2.77 billion for the first nine months of fiscal 2009. QTL revenues in the first nine
months of fiscal 2010 included $71 million attributable to fiscal 2009 that had previously not been
recognized due to discussions regarding a license agreement that was signed in the first quarter of
fiscal 2010. The $101 million decrease in revenues (before the $71 million offset) was primarily
due to lower royalties per unit of CDMA-based devices sold by licensees, including the effect of
underreported royalties by a licensee and the deferral of revenue due to an on-going arbitration
with Panasonic, partially offset by an increase in the volume of sales of CDMA-based devices by
licensees. QTLs earnings before taxes for the first nine months of fiscal 2010 were $2.27 billion,
compared to $2.38 billion for the
first nine months of fiscal 2009. QTLs operating margin percentage was 83% in the first nine
months of fiscal 2010, compared to 85% in the first nine months of fiscal 2009. The decrease in QTL
earnings before taxes was primarily attributable to the decrease in QTL revenues and an increase in
patent related costs, which caused a corresponding decline in operating margin percentage.
QWI Segment. QWI revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2010 were $456 million, compared
to $494 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2009. Revenues decreased primarily due to a $51
million decrease in QIS revenues. The decrease in QIS revenues was primarily attributable to a $41
million decrease in QChat revenues resulting primarily from the cessation of development efforts
under the licensing agreement with Sprint and an $11 million decrease in BREW revenues resulting
from lower consumer demand. QWI earnings before taxes for the first nine months of fiscal 2010 were
$14 million, compared to $25 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2009. QWI operating margin
percentage was 1% in the first nine months of fiscal 2010, compared to 5% in the first nine months
of fiscal 2009. The decrease in QWI earnings before taxes was primarily attributable to the
decrease in QIS revenues, partially offset by a decrease in QES operating expenses. The decrease in
QWI operating margin percentage was primarily attributable to a decrease in QIS gross margin
percentage, partially offset by the effect of the decrease in QES operating expenses.
QSI Segment. QSI revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2010 were $9 million, compared
to $22 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2009. QSI revenues are attributable to our FLO
TV subsidiary. The decrease in FLO TV revenues was primarily due to an increase in customer-related
incentives that were recorded as reductions in revenues and lower service-related revenues. QSI
loss before taxes for the first nine months of fiscal 2010 was $283 million, compared to $266
million for the first nine months of fiscal 2009. QSI loss before taxes increased by $17 million
primarily due to a $94 million increase in our FLO TV subsidiarys loss before taxes, partially
offset by a $62 million gain on the sale of our Australia spectrum license and a $15 million
decrease in net investment losses (unrelated to FLO TV).
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal sources of liquidity are our existing cash, cash equivalents and marketable
securities, cash generated from operations and proceeds from the issuance of common stock under our
stock option and employee stock purchase plans. Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities
were $17.6 billion at June 27, 2010, a decrease of $156 million from September 27, 2009. Our cash,
cash equivalents and marketable securities at June 27, 2010 consisted of $5.9 billion held
domestically and $11.7 billion held by foreign subsidiaries. Due to tax and accounting
considerations, we derive liquidity for operations primarily from domestic cash flow and
investments held domestically. Total cash provided by operating activities decreased to $3.0
billion during the first nine months of fiscal 2010, compared to $5.9 billion during the first nine
months of fiscal 2009. The decrease was primarily due to collection of the $2.5 billion trade
receivable in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 related to the license and settlement agreements
completed with Nokia in September 2008.
During the first nine months of fiscal 2010, we repurchased and retired 76,259,000 shares of
our common stock for $2.9 billion. On March 1, 2010, we announced that we had been authorized to
repurchase up to $3.0 billion of our common stock, and $1.8 billion of that amount remained
available at June 27, 2010. The stock repurchase program has no expiration date. Since June 27,
2010, we have repurchased and retired 3,529,000 shares of our common stock for $122 million. We
intend to continue to repurchase shares of our common stock under this
29
program as a means of returning capital to stockholders, subject to capital availability and periodic determinations that
stock repurchases are in the best interests of our stockholders.
On March 1, 2010, we announced an increase in our quarterly cash dividend per share of common
stock from $0.17 to $0.19, which is effective for quarterly dividends payable after March 28, 2010.
We announced cash dividends totaling $309 million, or $0.19 per share, during the third quarter of
fiscal 2010, which were paid on June 25, 2010. On July 8, 2010, we announced a cash dividend of
$0.19 per share on our common stock, payable on September 24, 2010 to stockholders of record as of
August 27, 2010. We intend to continue to use cash dividends as a means of returning capital to
stockholders, subject to capital availability and periodic determinations that cash dividends are
in the best interests of our stockholders.
Accounts receivable increased 17% during the third quarter of fiscal 2010. Days sales
outstanding, on a consolidated basis, were 27 days at June 27, 2010 compared to 22 days at March
28, 2010. The increases in accounts receivable and the related days sales outstanding were primarily due to increased
sales and the effects of the timing of shipments and customer payments for receivables related to
integrated circuits.
We believe our current cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities and our expected cash
flow generated from operations will provide us with flexibility and satisfy our working and other
capital requirements over the next fiscal year and beyond based on our current business plans.
|
|
|
Our total research and development expenditures were $1.9 billion in the first nine
months of fiscal 2010 and $2.4 billion in fiscal 2009, and we expect to continue to
invest heavily in research and development for new technologies, applications and
services for the wireless industry. |
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures were $313 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2010 and
$761 million in fiscal 2009, and advance payment on spectrum was $1.1 billion in the
first nine months of fiscal 2010. We anticipate that capital expenditures, which exclude
the advance payment on spectrum, will be lower in fiscal 2010 as compared to fiscal 2009
because fiscal 2009 capital expenditures included amounts for the build-out of a
manufacturing facility related to our Qualcomm MEMS Technologies division, however,
future capital expenditures may be impacted by transactions that are currently not
forecasted. |
|
|
|
|
Our purchase obligations for the remainder of fiscal 2010 and for fiscal 2011, some
of which relate to research and development activities and capital expenditures, totaled
$915 million and $365 million, respectively, at June 27, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we are obligated to pay $1.4 billion to the
United States tax authorities as a result of the cash and intangible assets received in
connection with the 2008 license and settlement agreements with Nokia. We intend to use
cash held domestically to settle this obligation. |
|
|
|
|
In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we are obligated to repay a $1.1 billion
short-term bank loan that is denominated in Indian rupees. The loan has a fixed interest
rate of 6.75% per year with interest payments due monthly. The loan is related to the
BWA spectrum recently won in the India auction. |
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to the Settlement and Patent License and Non-Assert Agreement with Broadcom,
we are obligated to pay a remaining $518 million ratably through April 2013, including
interest. |
|
|
|
|
Cash used for strategic investments and acquisitions, net of
cash acquired, was $45 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2010 and $54 million in fiscal 2009, and we
expect to continue making strategic investments and acquisitions to open new markets for
our technology, expand our technology, obtain development resources, grow our patent
portfolio or pursue new business opportunities. |
Contractual Obligations/Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no significant contractual obligations not fully recorded on our condensed
consolidated balance sheets or fully disclosed in the notes to our condensed consolidated financial
statements. Our consolidated balance sheet at June 27, 2010 includes a $1.1 billion bank loan that
is payable in full in Indian rupees in December 2010. We have no material off-balance sheet
arrangements as defined in S-K 303(a)(4)(ii).
Additional information regarding our financial commitments at June 27, 2010 is provided in the
notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements. See Notes to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements, Note 6 Income Taxes and Note 8 Commitments and Contingencies.
30
Risk Factors
You should consider each of the following factors as well as the other information in this
Quarterly Report in evaluating our business and our prospects. The risks and uncertainties
described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently
known to us or that we currently consider immaterial may also impair our business operations. If
any of the following risks actually occur, our business and financial results could be harmed. In
that case, the market price of our common stock could decline. You should also refer to the other
information set forth in this Quarterly Report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended September 27, 2009, including our financial statements and the related notes.
If deployment of our technologies does not expand as expected, our revenues may not grow as
anticipated.
Historically, we have focused our business primarily on developing, patenting and
commercializing CDMA technology for wireless telecommunications applications. Other digital
wireless communications technologies, particularly GSM technology, have been more widely deployed
than CDMA technology. If adoption and use of CDMA-based wireless communications standards do not
continue in the countries where our products and those of our customers and licensees are sold, our
business and financial results could suffer. If GSM wireless operators do not select CDMA for their
networks or upgrade their current networks to any CDMA-based third-generation (3G) technology, our
business and financial results could suffer since we have not previously generated significant
revenues from sales of single-mode GSM products. In addition to CDMA technology, we continue to
increase our investments in developing, patenting and commercializing OFDMA technology, which has
not yet been widely adopted and commercially deployed, and our MediaFLO technology, which was
commercially deployed in the United States in fiscal 2007. If OFDMA is not widely adopted and
commercially deployed and/or MediaFLO technology is not more widely adopted by consumers in the
United States or commercially deployed internationally, our investments in OFDMA and MediaFLO
technologies may not provide us an adequate return.
Our business and the deployment of our technologies, products and services are dependent on
the success of our customers, licensees and CDMA-based wireless operators, as well as the timing of
their deployment of new services. Our licensees and CDMA-based wireless operators may incur lower
gross margins on products or services based on our technologies than on products using alternative
technologies as a result of greater competition or other factors. If CDMA-based wireless operators,
wireless device and/or infrastructure manufacturers cease providing CDMA-based products and/or
services, the deployment of CDMA technology could be negatively affected, and our business could
suffer.
We are dependent on the commercial deployment and upgrades of 3G wireless communications equipment,
products and services to increase our revenues, and our business may be harmed if wireless network
operators delay or are unsuccessful in the commercial deployment or upgrade of 3G technology or if
they deploy other technologies.
To increase our revenues in future periods, we are dependent upon the commercial deployment
and upgrades of 3G wireless communications equipment, products and services based on our CDMA
technology. Although wireless network operators have commercially deployed CDMA2000 and WCDMA, we
cannot predict the timing or success of further commercial deployments or expansions or upgrades of
CDMA2000, WCDMA or other CDMA systems. If existing deployments are not commercially successful or
do not continue to grow their subscriber base, or if new commercial deployments of CDMA2000, WCDMA
or other CDMA-based systems are delayed or unsuccessful, our business and financial results may be
harmed. In addition, our business could be harmed if wireless network operators deploy other
technologies or switch existing networks from CDMA to GSM without upgrading to WCDMA or if wireless
network operators introduce new technologies. A limited number of wireless operators have deployed
and/or started testing OFDMA technology, but the timing and extent of additional OFDMA deployments
is uncertain, and we might not be successful in developing and marketing OFDMA products.
Our patent portfolio may not be as successful in generating licensing income with respect to other
technologies as it has been for CDMA-based technologies.
Although we own a very strong portfolio of issued and pending patents related to GSM, GPRS,
EDGE, OFDM, OFDMA and/or Multiple Input, Multiple Output (MIMO) technologies, our patent portfolio
licensing program in these areas is less established and might not be as successful in generating
licensing income as our CDMA portfolio licensing program. Many wireless operators are investigating
or have selected LTE (or to a lesser extent WiMAX) as next-generation technologies for deployment
in existing or future spectrum bands as complementary to their
31
existing CDMA-based networks.
Although we believe that our patented technology is essential and useful to implementation of the
LTE and WiMAX standards and have granted royalty-bearing licenses to nine companies to make and
sell products implementing those standards (including Nokia, LG Electronics and Samsung), we might
not achieve the same royalty revenues on such LTE or WiMAX deployments as on CDMA-based
deployments, and we might not achieve the same level of success in selling LTE or WiMAX products as
we have in CDMA-based products.
Our earnings are subject to substantial quarterly and annual fluctuations and to market downturns.
Our revenues and earnings have fluctuated significantly in the past and may fluctuate
significantly in the future. General economic or other conditions have caused a downturn in the
market for our products or technology. Despite
the recent improvements in market conditions, a future downturn in the demand for our products
or technology could adversely affect our operating results and increase the risk of substantial
quarterly and annual fluctuations in our earnings. Any prolonged financial or economic crisis may
result in the insolvency of key suppliers resulting in product delays; delays in reporting and/or
payments from our licensees; customer/licensee insolvencies that impact our customers/licensees
ability to pay us, which may delay or impede our ability to recognize revenue and/or result in bad
debt expense; the inability of our customers to obtain credit to finance purchases of our products
and/or cause our customers to change delivery schedules, cancel committed purchase orders or reduce
purchase order commitment projections; uncertainty in global economies, which could impact demand
for CDMA-based products in various regions; counterparty failures negatively impacting our treasury
operations; and the inability to utilize federal and/or state capital loss carryovers.
Financial market volatility has impacted, and could continue to impact, the value and
performance of our marketable securities. Net investment income could vary depending on the gains
or losses realized on the sale or exchange of securities, gains or losses from equity method
investments, impairment charges related to marketable securities and other investments, changes in
interest rates and changes in fair values of derivative instruments. Our cash equivalent and
marketable securities investments represent significant assets that may be subject to fluctuating
or even negative returns depending upon interest rate movements and financial market conditions in
fixed income and equity securities.
Our future operating results may be affected by many factors, including, but not limited to:
our ability to retain existing or secure anticipated customers or licensees, both domestically and
internationally; our ability to develop, introduce and market new technology, products and services
on a timely basis; management of inventory by us and our customers and their customers in response
to shifts in market demand; changes in the mix of technology and products developed, licensed,
produced and sold; seasonal customer demand; disputes with our customers and licensees; and other
factors described elsewhere in this Quarterly Report and in these risk factors.
These factors affecting our future earnings are difficult to forecast and could harm our
quarterly and/or annual operating results. If our earnings fail to meet the financial guidance we
provide to investors, or the expectations of investment analysts or investors in any period,
securities class action litigation could be brought against us and/or the market price of our
common stock could decline.
Global economic conditions that impact the wireless communications industry could negatively affect
our revenues and operating results.
Despite the recent improvements in market conditions, a future decline in global economic
conditions could have adverse, wide-ranging effects on demand for our products and for the products
of our customers, particularly wireless communications equipment manufacturers or other members of
the wireless industry, such as wireless network operators. We cannot predict other negative events
that may have adverse effects on the economy, on demand for wireless device products or on wireless
device inventories at CDMA-based equipment manufacturers and wireless operators. Inflation and/or
deflation and economic recessions that adversely affect the global economy and capital markets also
adversely affect our customers and our end consumers. For example, our customers ability to
purchase or pay for our products and services, obtain financing and upgrade wireless networks could
be adversely affected, leading to cancellation or delay of orders for our products. Also, our end
consumers standards of living could be lowered, and their ability to purchase wireless devices
based on our technology could be diminished. Inflation could also increase our costs of raw
materials and the cost of our products, our operating expenses and harm our business in other ways,
and deflation could reduce our revenues if product prices fall. Any
32
of these results from worsening
global economic conditions could negatively affect our revenues and operating results.
A significant downturn in the economies of Asian countries where many of our customers and
licensees are located or the economies of the other major markets (e.g., Europe and North America)
they serve could materially harm our business. During the first nine months of fiscal 2010, 67% of
our revenues were from customers and licensees based in South Korea, China and Taiwan as compared
to 64% during the first nine months of fiscal 2009. During fiscal 2009, 66% of our revenues were
from customers and licensees based in South Korea, China and Taiwan, as compared to 61% during
fiscal 2008. These customers sell their products to markets worldwide, including in Japan, South
Korea, China, India, North America, South America and Europe. In addition, the continued threat of
terrorism and heightened security and military action in response to this threat, or any future
acts of war or terrorism, may cause disruptions to the global economy and to the wireless
communications industry and create uncertainties. Should such negative events occur, subsequent economic recovery might
not benefit us in the near term. If it does not, our ability to increase or maintain our revenues
and operating results may be impaired. In addition, because we intend to continue to make
significant investments in research and development and to maintain extensive ongoing customer
service and support capability, any decline in the rate of growth of our revenues will have a
significant adverse impact on our operating results.
Our four largest customers accounted for 43% and 48% of consolidated revenues in the first nine
months of fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively, and 49% and 42% in fiscal 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The loss of any one of our major customers or any reduction in the demand for devices
utilizing our CDMA technology could reduce our revenues and harm our ability to achieve or sustain
desired levels of operating results.
The loss of any one of our QCT segments significant customers or the delay, even if only
temporary, or cancellation of significant orders from any of these customers would reduce our
revenues in the period of the deferral or cancellation and harm our ability to achieve or sustain
expected levels of operating results. We derive a significant portion of our QCT segment revenues
from four major customers. Accordingly, unless and until our QCT segment diversifies and expands
its customer base, our future success will significantly depend upon the timing and size of any
future purchase orders from these customers. Factors that may impact the size and timing of orders
from customers of our QCT segment include, among others, the following:
|
|
|
the product requirements of our customers and the network operators; |
|
|
|
|
the level of component integration and interoperability required by our customers; |
|
|
|
|
the financial and operational success of our customers; |
|
|
|
|
the success of our customers products that incorporate our products; |
|
|
|
|
changes in wireless penetration growth rates; |
|
|
|
|
value-added features that drive replacement rates; |
|
|
|
|
shortages of key products and components; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in channel inventory levels; |
|
|
|
|
the success of products sold to our customers by competitors; |
|
|
|
|
the rate of deployment of new technology by the wireless network operators and the
rate of adoption of new technology by end consumers; |
|
|
|
|
the extent to which certain customers successfully develop and produce CDMA-based
integrated circuits and system software to meet their own needs or source such products
from other suppliers; |
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions; and |
|
|
|
|
changes in governmental regulations in countries where we or our customers currently
operate or plan to operate. |
We derive a significant portion of our royalty revenues in our QTL segment from a limited number of
licensees and our future success depends on the ability of our licensees to obtain market
acceptance for their products.
33
Our QTL segment today derives royalty revenues primarily from sales of CDMA products by our
licensees. Although we have more than 180 licensees, we derive a significant portion of our royalty
revenues from a limited number of licensees. Our future success depends upon the ability of our
licensees to develop, introduce and deliver high-volume products that achieve and sustain market
acceptance. We have little or no control over the sales efforts of our licensees, and our licensees
might not be successful. Reductions in the average selling price of wireless communications devices
utilizing our CDMA technology, without a sufficient increase in the volumes of such devices sold,
could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We may not be able to modify some of our license agreements to license later patents without
modifying some of the other material terms and conditions of such license agreements, and such
modifications may impact our revenues.
The licenses granted to and from us under a number of our license agreements include only
patents that are either filed or issued prior to a certain date, and, in a small number of
agreements, royalties are payable on those patents for a specified time period. As a result, there
are agreements with some licensees where later patents are not licensed by or to us under our
license agreements. In order to license any such later patents, we will need to extend or modify
our license agreements or enter into new license agreements with such licensees. We might not be
able to modify such license agreements in the future to license any such later patents or extend
such date(s) to incorporate later patents without affecting the material terms and conditions of
our license agreements with such licensees.
Efforts by some telecommunications equipment manufacturers to avoid paying fair and reasonable
royalties for the use of our intellectual property may create uncertainty about our future business
prospects, may require the investment of substantial management time and financial resources, and
may result in legal decisions and/or political actions by foreign governments that harm our
business.
A small number of companies have initiated various strategies in an attempt to renegotiate,
mitigate and/or eliminate their need to pay royalties to us for the use of our intellectual
property in order to negatively affect our business model and that of our other licensees. These
strategies have included (i) litigation, often alleging infringement of patents held by such
companies, patent misuse, patent exhaustion and patent and license unenforceability, or some form
of unfair competition, (ii) taking questionable positions on the interpretation of contracts with
us, (iii) appeals to governmental authorities, such as the complaints filed with the Korea Fair
Trade Commission (KFTC) and the Japan Fair Trade Commission (JFTC) during 2006, (iv) collective
action, including working with carriers, standards bodies, other like-minded technology companies
and other organizations, formal and informal, to adopt intellectual property policies and practices
that could have the effect of limiting returns on intellectual property innovations and (v)
lobbying with governmental regulators and elected officials for the purpose of seeking the
imposition of some form of compulsory licensing and/or to weaken a patent holders ability to
enforce its rights or obtain a fair return for such rights. A number of these strategies are
purportedly based on interpretations of the policies of certain standards development organizations
concerning the licensing of patents that are or may be essential to industry standards and our
alleged failure to abide by these policies. There is a risk that relevant courts or governmental
agencies will interpret those policies in a manner adverse to our interests.
Although we believe that these challenges are without merit, and we will continue to
vigorously defend our intellectual property and contract rights and our right to continue to
receive a fair return for our innovations, the distractions caused by challenges to our business
model and licensing program are undesirable and the legal and other costs associated with defending
our position have been and continue to be significant. We assume, as should investors, that such
challenges will continue into the foreseeable future and may require the investment of substantial
management time and financial resources to explain and defend our position.
The enforcement and protection of our intellectual property rights may be expensive and could
divert our valuable resources.
We rely primarily on patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as
nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements and other methods, to protect our proprietary
information, technologies and processes, including our patent portfolio. Policing unauthorized use
of our products and technologies is difficult and time consuming. We cannot be certain that the
steps we have taken will prevent the misappropriation or unauthorized use of our proprietary
information and technologies, particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect our
proprietary intellectual property rights as fully or as readily as United States laws. We cannot be
certain that the laws and policies of any country, including the United States, or the practices of
any of the standards bodies, foreign or domestic, with respect to intellectual property enforcement
or licensing, issuance of spectrum licenses or the
34
adoption of standards, will not be changed in a
way detrimental to our licensing program or to the sale or use of our products or technology.
The vast majority of our patents and patent applications relate to our wireless communications
technology and much of the remainder of our patents and patent applications relate to our other
technologies and products. We may need to litigate to enforce our intellectual property rights,
protect our trade secrets or determine the validity and scope of proprietary rights of others. As a
result of any such litigation, we could lose our ability to enforce one or more patents or incur
substantial unexpected operating costs. Any action we take to enforce our intellectual property
rights could be costly and could absorb significant management time and attention, which, in turn,
could negatively impact our operating results. In addition, failure to protect our trademark rights
could impair our brand identity.
Claims by other companies that we infringe their intellectual property or that patents on which we
rely are invalid could adversely affect our business.
From time to time, companies have asserted, and may again assert, patent, copyright and other
intellectual property rights against our products or products using our technologies or other
technologies used in our industry. These claims have resulted and may again result in our
involvement in litigation. We may not prevail in such litigation given the complex technical issues
and inherent uncertainties in intellectual property litigation. If any of our products were found
to infringe on another companys intellectual property rights, we could be subject to an injunction
or required to redesign our products, which could be costly, or to license such rights and/or pay
damages or other compensation to such other company. If we were unable to redesign our products,
license such intellectual property rights used in our products or otherwise distribute our products
through a licensed supplier, we could be prohibited from making and selling such products.
We expect that we will continue to be involved in litigation and may have to appear in front
of administrative bodies (such as the U.S. International Trade Commission) to defend against patent
assertions against our products by companies, some of whom are attempting to gain competitive
advantage or negotiating leverage in licensing negotiations. We may not be successful and, if we
are not, the range of possible outcomes includes everything from a royalty payment to an injunction
on the sale of certain of our chipsets (and on the sale of our customers devices using our
chipsets) and the imposition of royalty payments that might make purchases of our chipsets less
economical for our customers. A negative outcome in any such litigation could severely disrupt the
business of our chipset customers and their wireless operator customers, which in turn could hurt
our relationships with our chipset customers and wireless operators and could result in a decline
in our share of worldwide chipset sales and/or a reduction in our licensees sales to wireless
operators, causing a corresponding decline in our chipset and/or licensing revenues.
In addition, as the number of competitors or other patent holders in the market increases and
the functionality of our products expand to include additional technologies and features, we may
become subject to claims of infringement or misappropriation of the intellectual property rights of
others. Any claims, regardless of their merit, could be time consuming to address, result in costly
litigation, divert the efforts of our technical and management personnel or cause product release
or shipment delays, any of which could have a material adverse effect upon our operating results.
In any potential dispute involving other companies patents or other intellectual property, our
chipset suppliers and customers could also become the targets of litigation. We are contingently
liable under certain product sales, services, license and other agreements to indemnify certain
customers against certain types of liability and/or damages arising from qualifying claims of
patent infringement by products or services sold or provided by us. Reimbursements under
indemnification arrangements could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Furthermore, any such litigation could severely disrupt the supply of our products and the business
of our chipset customers and their wireless operator customers, which in turn could hurt our
relationships with our chipset customers and wireless operators and could result in a decline in
our chipset sales and/or a reduction in our licensees sales to wireless operators, causing a
corresponding decline in our chipset and/or licensing revenues.
A number of other companies have claimed to own patents essential to various CDMA standards,
GSM standards and OFDMA standards or implementations of OFDM and OFDMA systems. If we or other
product manufacturers are required to obtain additional licenses and/or pay royalties to one or
more patent holders, this could have a material adverse effect on the commercial implementation of
our CDMA, GSM, OFDMA or multimode products and technologies, demand for our licensees products and
our profitability.
35
Other companies or entities also have commenced, and may again commence, actions seeking to
establish the invalidity of our patents. In the event that one or more of our patents are
challenged, a court may invalidate the patent(s) or determine that the patent(s) is not
enforceable, which could harm our competitive position. If our key patents are invalidated, or if
the scope of the claims in any of these patents is limited by court decision, we could be prevented
from licensing the invalidated or limited portion of such patents. Such adverse decisions could
negatively impact our revenues. Even if such a patent challenge is not successful, it could be
expensive and time consuming to address, divert management attention from our business and harm our
reputation.
Our industry is subject to competition that could result in decreased demand for our products and
the products of our customers and licensees and/or declining average selling prices for our
licensees products and our products, negatively affecting our revenues and operating results.
We currently face significant competition in our markets and expect that competition will
continue. Competition in the telecommunications market is affected by various factors, including:
|
|
|
comprehensiveness of products and technologies; |
|
|
|
|
value-added features that drive replacement rates and selling prices; |
|
|
|
|
manufacturing capability; |
|
|
|
|
scalability and the ability of the system technology to meet customers immediate and
future network requirements; |
|
|
|
|
product performance and quality; |
|
|
|
|
design and engineering capabilities; |
|
|
|
|
compliance with industry standards; |
|
|
|
|
time-to-market; |
|
|
|
|
system cost; and |
|
|
|
|
customer support. |
This competition may increase development costs and reduce average selling prices for our
products and those of our customers and licensees. Reductions in the average selling prices of our
licensees products, unless offset by an increase in volumes, generally result in reduced royalties
payable to us. While pricing pressures from competition may, to a large extent, be mitigated by the
introduction of new features and functionality in our licensees products as evidenced by the
recent success of smartphones and other feature-rich, data-capable devices, there is no guarantee
that such mitigation will continue to occur. We anticipate that additional competitors will enter
our markets as a result of growth opportunities in wireless telecommunications, the trend toward
global expansion by foreign and domestic competitors, technological and public policy changes and
relatively low barriers to entry in selected segments of the industry.
Companies that promote non-CDMA technologies (e.g., GSM, WiMAX) and companies that design
CDMA-based integrated circuits are generally included amongst our competitors or potential
competitors in the United States and abroad. Examples (some of whom are strategic partners of ours
in other areas) include Broadcom, Freescale, Fujitsu, Icera, Infineon, Intel, Marvell Technology,
Mediatek, nVidia, Renesas Electronics, ST-Ericsson (a joint venture between Ericsson Mobile
Platforms and ST-NXP Wireless), Texas Instruments and VIA Telecom.
Many of these current and potential competitors have advantages over us, including:
|
|
|
longer operating histories and market presence; |
|
|
|
|
greater name recognition; |
|
|
|
|
motivation by our customers in certain circumstances to find alternate suppliers; |
|
|
|
|
access to larger customer bases; |
|
|
|
|
greater sales and marketing, manufacturing, distribution, technical and other
resources; |
36
|
|
|
government support of other technologies; and |
|
|
|
|
more extensive relationships with indigenous distribution and original equipment
manufacturer (OEM) companies in developing territories (e.g., China). |
As a result of these and other factors, our competitors may be more successful than us. In
addition, we anticipate new competitors, including companies not previously engaged in
manufacturing telecommunications chipsets, to begin offering and selling products based on 3G
standards, LTE and WiMAX. These competitors may have more established relationships and
distribution channels in markets not currently deploying CDMA-based wireless
communications technology. These competitors also may have established or may establish
financial or strategic relationships among themselves or with our existing or potential customers,
resellers or other third parties. These relationships may affect our customers decisions to
purchase products or license technology from us or to use alternative technologies. Accordingly,
new competitors or alliances among competitors could emerge and rapidly acquire significant market
share of sales to our detriment. In addition to the foregoing, we have seen, and believe we will
continue to see, an increase in customers requesting that we develop products, including chipsets
and associated software, that will incorporate open source software elements and operate in an
open source environment, which may offer accessibility to a portion of a products source code
and may expose related intellectual property to adverse licensing conditions. Developing open
source products, without imperiling the intellectual property rights upon which our licensing
business depends, may prove difficult under certain circumstances, thereby placing us at a
competitive disadvantage for new product designs.
With respect to our QES business, our competitors are aggressively pricing products and
services and are offering new value-added products and services, which may impact margins,
intensify competition in current and new markets and harm our ability to compete in certain
markets.
We continue to believe our FLO TV service offering provides compelling advantages to
consumers. However, we face indirect competition to our FLO TV products and services from wireless
delivery of streaming and downloadable video content via wireless operators, OEMs and other
providers of mobile video content, as well as from internet video content accessed through the
mobile web browser. Our FLO TV business had $1.3 billion in assets (including $746 million in
spectrum licenses) at June 27, 2010. If we are unable to generate adequate operating income in the
future, our assets could become impaired, which could negatively impact our operating results.
While we continue to believe our QMT divisions interferometric modulator (IMOD) displays will
offer compelling advantages to users of displays, there can be no assurance that other technologies
will not continue to improve in ways that reduce the advantages we anticipate from our IMOD
displays. Sales of flat panel displays are currently, and we believe will likely continue to be for
some time, dominated by displays based on liquid crystal display (LCD) technology. Numerous
companies are making substantial investments in, and conducting research to improve characteristics
of, LCDs. Additionally, several other flat panel display technologies have been, or are being,
developed, including technologies for the production of organic light-emitting diode (OLED), field
emission, inorganic electroluminescence, gas plasma and vacuum fluorescent displays. In each case,
advances in LCD or other flat panel display technologies could result in technologies that are more
cost effective, have fewer display limitations or can be brought to market faster than our IMOD
technology. These advances in competing technologies might cause display manufacturers to avoid
entering into commercial relationships with us, or not renew planned or existing relationships with
us. Our QMT division had $390 million in assets (including $128 million in goodwill) at June 27,
2010. If we do not achieve adequate market penetration with our IMOD display technology, our assets
may become impaired, which could negatively impact our operating results.
Attempts by certain companies, if successful, to amend or modify Standards Development
Organizations (SDOs) and other industry forums intellectual property policies could impact our
licensing business.
Some companies have proposed significant changes to existing intellectual property policies
for implementation by SDOs and other industry organizations, some of which would require a maximum
aggregate intellectual property royalty rate for the use of all essential patents owned by all of
the member companies to be applied to the selling price of any product implementing the relevant
standard. They have further proposed that such maximum aggregate royalty rate be apportioned to
each member company with essential patents based upon the number of essential patents held by such
company. In May 2007, seven companies (Nokia, Nokia-Siemens, NEC, Ericsson, SonyEricsson,
Alcatel-Lucent and NextWave) issued a press release announcing their commitment to the principles
37
described above with respect to the licensing of patents essential to LTE and inviting all other
industry participants to join them in adopting such policies. Although the European
Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) IPR Special Committee and the Next Generation Mobile
Network industry group have thus far determined that such proposals should not be adopted as
amendments to existing ETSI policies or new policies, and no other companies have joined these
seven companies, such proposals as described above might be revisited within ETSI and might be
adopted by other SDOs or industry groups, formal and/or informal, resulting in a potential
disadvantage to our business model either by artificially limiting our return on investment with
respect to new technologies or forcing us to work outside of the SDOs or such other industry groups
for promoting our new technologies.
We depend upon a limited number of third-party suppliers to manufacture and test component parts,
subassemblies and finished goods for our products. If these third-party suppliers do not allocate
adequate manufacturing and test capacity in their facilities to produce products on our behalf, or
if there are any disruptions in the operations, or the loss, of any of these third parties, it
could harm our ability to meet our delivery obligations to our customers, reduce our revenues,
increase our cost of sales and harm our business.
A suppliers ability to meet our product manufacturing and test demand is limited mainly by
its overall capacity and current capacity availability. Our ability to meet customer demand
depends, in part, on our ability to obtain timely and adequate delivery of parts and components
from our suppliers. A reduction or interruption in our product supply source, an inability of our
suppliers to react to shifts in product demand or an increase in component prices could have a
material adverse effect on our business or profitability. Component shortages could adversely
affect our ability and that of our customers to ship products on a timely basis and, as a result,
our customers demand for our products. Any such shipment delays or declines in demand could reduce
our revenues and harm our ability to achieve or sustain desired levels of profitability.
Additionally, failure to meet customer demand in a timely manner could damage our reputation and
harm our customer relationships. Our operations may also be harmed by lengthy or recurring
disruptions at any of our suppliers manufacturing or test facilities and by disruptions in the
distribution channels from our suppliers and to our customers. Any such disruptions could cause
significant delays in shipments until we are able to shift the products from an affected
manufacturer to another manufacturer. If the affected supplier was a sole-source supplier, we may
not be able to obtain the product without significant cost and delay. The loss of a significant
third-party supplier or the inability of a third-party supplier to meet performance and quality
specifications or delivery schedules could harm our ability to meet our delivery obligations to our
customers and negatively impact our revenues and business operations.
QCT Segment. Although we have entered into long-term contracts with our suppliers, most of
these contracts do not provide for long-term capacity commitments, except as may be provided in a
particular purchase order that has been accepted by our supplier. To the extent that we do not have
firm commitments from our suppliers over a specific time period, or in any specific quantity, our
suppliers may allocate, and in the past have allocated, capacity to the production and testing of
products for their other customers while reducing capacity to manufacture or test our products.
Accordingly, capacity for our products may not be available when we need it or available at
reasonable prices. We have experienced capacity limitations from our suppliers, which resulted in
supply constraints and our inability to meet certain customer demand. There can be no assurance
that we will not experience these or other supply constraints in the future, which could result in
our failure to meet customer demand.
While our goal is to establish alternate suppliers for technologies that we consider critical,
some of our integrated circuits products are only available from single sources, with which we do
not have long-term capacity commitments. Our reliance on sole- or limited-source suppliers involves
significant risks including possible shortages of manufacturing capacity, poor product performance
and reduced control over delivery schedules, manufacturing capability and yields, quality
assurance, quantity and costs. Our arrangements with our suppliers may oblige us to incur costs to
manufacture and test our products that do not decrease at the same rate as decreases in pricing to
our customers, which may result in lowering our operating margins. In addition, the timely
readiness of our foundry suppliers to support transitions to smaller geometry process technologies
could impact our ability to meet customer demand, revenues and cost expectations. The timing of
acceptance of the smaller technology designs by our customers may subject us to the risk of excess
inventories of earlier designs.
In the event of a loss of, or a decision to change, a third-party supplier, qualifying a new
foundry supplier and commencing volume production or testing could involve delay and expense,
resulting in lost revenues, reduced operating margins and possible loss of customers. We work
closely with our customers to expedite their processes for evaluating new integrated circuits from
our foundry suppliers; however, in some instances, transition of
38
integrated circuit production to a new foundry supplier may cause a temporary decline in
shipments of specific integrated circuits to individual customers.
Under our Integrated Fabless Manufacturing (IFM) model, we purchase die from semiconductor
manufacturing foundries, contract with separate third-party manufacturers for back-end assembly and
test services and ship the completed integrated circuits to our customers. We are unable to
directly control the services provided by our semiconductor assembly and test (SAT) suppliers,
including the timely procurement of packaging materials for our products, availability of assembly
and test capacity, manufacturing yields, quality assurance and product delivery schedules. This
lack of control could cause disruptions in our operations that could harm our ability to meet our
delivery obligations to our customers, reduce our revenues or increase our cost of sales.
QMT Division. QMT needs to form and maintain reliable business relationships with flat panel
display manufacturers or other targeted partners to support the manufacture of IMOD displays in
commercial volumes. All of our current relationships have been for the development and limited
production of certain IMOD display panels and/or modules. Some or all of these relationships may
not succeed or, even if they are successful, may not result in the display manufacturers entering
into material supply relationships with us.
FLO TV Business. FLO TV depends on a limited number of third-party suppliers to manufacture
and test component parts, subassemblies and finished goods for products related to our
direct-to-consumer FLO TV service offering. If these third-party suppliers do not allocate adequate
manufacturing and test capacity in their facilities to produce products on our behalf, or if there
are any disruptions in the operations, or the loss, of any of these third parties, our ability to
meet our or our partners delivery obligations to customers could be harmed, which could negatively
impact our operating results. Lack of devices could also delay subscriber adoption of our FLO TV
service.
Our suppliers may also be our competitors, putting us at a disadvantage for pricing and capacity
allocation.
One or more of our suppliers may obtain licenses from us to manufacture CDMA-based integrated
circuits that compete with our products. In this event, the supplier could elect to allocate raw
materials and manufacturing capacity to their own products and reduce deliveries to us to our
detriment. In addition, we may not receive reasonable pricing, manufacturing or delivery terms. We
cannot guarantee that the actions of our suppliers will not cause disruptions in our operations
that could harm our ability to meet our delivery obligations to our customers or increase our cost
of sales.
We, and our licensees, are subject to the risks of conducting business outside the United States.
A significant part of our strategy involves our continued pursuit of growth opportunities in a
number of international market locations. We market, sell and service our products internationally.
We have established sales offices around the world. We expect to continue to expand our
international sales operations and to sell products in additional countries and locations. This
expansion will require significant management attention and financial resources to successfully
develop direct and indirect international sales and support channels, and we cannot assure you that
we will be successful or that our expenditures in this effort will not exceed the amount of any
resulting revenues. If we are not able to maintain or increase international market demand for our
products and technologies, we may not be able to maintain a desired rate of growth in our business.
Our international customers sell their products to markets throughout the world, including
China, India, Japan, South Korea, North America, South America and Europe. We distinguish revenues
from external customers by geographic areas based on the location to which our products, software
or services are delivered and, for QTLs licensing and royalty revenues, the invoiced addresses of
our licensees. Consolidated revenues from international customers as a percentage of total revenues
were greater than 90% in the first nine months of both fiscal 2010 and 2009. In many international
markets, barriers to entry are created by long-standing relationships between our potential
customers and their local service providers and protective regulations, including local content and
service requirements. In addition, our pursuit of international growth opportunities may require
significant investments for an extended period before we realize returns, if any, on our
investments. Our business could be adversely affected by a variety of uncontrollable and changing
factors, including:
|
|
|
difficulty in protecting or enforcing our intellectual property rights and/or
contracts in a particular foreign jurisdiction, including challenges to our licensing
practices under such jurisdictions competition laws; |
39
|
|
|
adoption of mandatory licensing provisions by foreign jurisdictions (either with
controlled/regulated royalties or royalty free); |
|
|
|
|
challenges pending before foreign competition agencies to the pricing and integration
of additional features and functionality into our wireless chipset products; |
|
|
|
|
our inability to succeed in significant foreign markets, such as China, India or
Europe; |
|
|
|
|
cultural differences in the conduct of business; |
|
|
|
|
difficulty in attracting qualified personnel and managing foreign activities; |
|
|
|
|
longer payment cycles for and greater difficulties collecting accounts receivable; |
|
|
|
|
export controls, tariffs and other trade protection measures; |
|
|
|
|
nationalization, expropriation and limitations on repatriation of cash; |
|
|
|
|
social, economic and political instability; |
|
|
|
|
natural disasters, energy blackouts, acts of terrorism, widespread illness and war; |
|
|
|
|
taxation; |
|
|
|
|
variability in the value of the dollar against foreign currency; and |
|
|
|
|
changes in laws and policies affecting trade, foreign investments, licensing
practices, environmental protection, loans and employment. |
We cannot be certain that the laws and policies of any country with respect to intellectual
property enforcement or licensing, issuance of spectrum licenses or the adoption of standards will
not be changed or enforced in a way detrimental to our licensing program or to the sale or use of
our products or technology.
The wireless markets in China and India, among others, represent growth opportunities for us.
If wireless operators in China or India, or the governments of China or India, make technology
deployment, implement limitations on intellectual property rights or make other decisions that
result in actions that are adverse to the expansion of CDMA technologies, our business could be
harmed.
We are subject to risks in certain global markets in which wireless operators provide
subsidies on wireless device sales to their customers. Increases in device prices that negatively
impact device sales can result from changes in regulatory policies related to device subsidies.
Limitations or changes in policy on device subsidies in South Korea, Japan, China and other
countries may have additional negative impacts on our revenues.
Currency fluctuations could negatively affect future product sales or royalty revenues, harm our
ability to collect receivables, or increase the U.S. dollar cost of the activities of our foreign
subsidiaries and international strategic investments.
We are exposed to risk from fluctuations in currencies, which may change over time as our
business practices evolve, that could impact our operating results, liquidity and financial
condition. We operate and invest globally. Adverse movements in currency exchange rates may
negatively affect our business due to a number of situations, including the following:
|
|
|
If the effective price of products sold by our customers were to increase as a result
of fluctuations in the exchange rate of the relevant currencies, demand for the products
could fall, which in turn would reduce our royalty and chipset revenues. |
|
|
|
Our products and those of our customers and licensees that are sold in U.S. dollars
become less price-competitive in international markets if the value of the U.S. dollar
increases relative to foreign currencies, and our revenues may not grow as quickly as
they otherwise might in response to worldwide growth in wireless products and services.
|
40
|
|
|
Declines in currency values in selected regions may adversely affect our operating
results because our products and those of our customers and licensees may become more
expensive to purchase in the countries of the affected currencies. |
|
|
|
|
Assets or liabilities of our consolidated subsidiaries and our foreign investees that
are not denominated in the functional currency of those entities are subject to the
effects of currency fluctuations, which may affect our reported earnings. Our exposure
to foreign currencies may increase as we increase our presence in existing markets or
expand into new markets. |
|
|
|
|
Investments in our consolidated foreign subsidiaries and in other foreign entities
that use the local currency as the functional currency (and the assets held by such
entities) may decline in value as a result of declines in local currency values. |
|
|
|
|
Certain of our revenues, such as royalty revenues, are derived from licensee or
customer sales that are denominated in foreign currencies. If these revenues are not
subject to foreign exchange hedging transactions, weakening of currency values in
selected regions could adversely affect our near term revenues and cash flows. In
addition, continued weakening of currency values in selected regions over an extended
period could adversely affect our future revenues and cash flows. |
|
|
|
|
We may engage in foreign exchange hedging transactions that could affect our cash
flows and earnings because they may require the payment of structuring fees, limit the
U.S. dollar value of royalties from licensees sales that are denominated in foreign
currencies, cause earnings volatility if the hedges do not qualify for hedge accounting
and expose us to counterparty risk if the counterparty fails to perform. |
|
|
|
|
Our trade receivables are generally U.S. dollar denominated. Any significant increase
in the value of the dollar against our customers or licensees functional currencies
could result in an increase in our customers or licensees cash flow requirements and
could consequently affect our ability to sell products and collect receivables. |
|
|
|
|
Our loan payable to banks is denominated in Indian rupees. If the U.S. dollar
significantly weakens, additional cash may be required to settle this obligation and the
related interest. |
|
|
|
|
Strengthening currency values in selected regions may adversely affect our operating
results because the activities of our foreign subsidiaries, and the costs of procuring
component parts and chipsets from foreign vendors, may become more expensive in U.S.
dollars. |
|
|
|
|
Strengthening currency values in selected regions may adversely affect our cash flows
and investment results because strategic investment obligations denominated in foreign
currencies may become more expensive, and the U.S. dollar cost of equity in losses of
foreign investees may increase. |
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange rate fluctuations may reduce the U.S. dollar value of our
marketable securities that are denominated directly or indirectly in foreign currencies. |
We may engage in acquisitions or strategic transactions or make investments that could result in
significant changes or management disruption and fail to enhance stockholder value.
From time to time, we engage in acquisitions or strategic transactions or make investments
with the goal of maximizing stockholder value. We acquire businesses and other assets, including
spectrum licenses, enter into joint ventures or other strategic transactions and purchase equity
and debt securities, including minority interests in publicly-traded and private companies,
non-investment-grade debt securities, equity and debt mutual and exchange-traded funds, corporate
bonds/notes, auction rate securities and other mortgage/asset-backed securities. Many of our
strategic investments are in early-stage companies to support our business, including the global
adoption of CDMA-based technologies and related services. Our investments in spectrum licenses may
involve the
build-out of commercial wireless systems or other additional investments. Failure or delay in
the completion of a build-out and the launch of services, or increases in the associated costs,
could have a material adverse effect on our future operating results. Most of our acquisitions or
strategic investments entail a high degree of risk and will not become liquid until more than one
year from the date of investment, if at all. Our acquisitions or strategic investments (either
those we have completed or may undertake in the future) may not generate financial returns or
result in increased adoption or continued use of our technologies. In addition, our acquisitions or
other investments may not generate financial returns or may result in losses due to market
volatility, the general level of interest rates, inflation
41
expectations or other developments affecting their values. In some cases, we may be required to consolidate or record our share of the
earnings or losses of companies in which we have acquired ownership interests. Our share of any
losses will adversely affect our financial results until we exit from or reduce our exposure to
these investments.
Achieving the anticipated benefits of business acquisitions depends in part upon our ability
to integrate the acquired businesses in an efficient and effective manner. The integration of
companies that have previously operated independently may result in significant challenges, and we
may be unable to accomplish the integration smoothly or successfully. The difficulties of
integrating companies include, among others:
|
|
|
retaining key employees; |
|
|
|
|
maintaining important relationships of Qualcomm and the acquired business; |
|
|
|
|
minimizing the diversion of managements attention from ongoing business matters; |
|
|
|
|
coordinating geographically separate organizations; |
|
|
|
|
consolidating research and development operations; and |
|
|
|
|
consolidating corporate and administrative infrastructures. |
We cannot assure you that the integration of acquired businesses with our business will result
in the realization of the full benefits anticipated by us to result from the acquisition. We may
not derive any commercial value from the acquired technology, products and intellectual property or
from future technologies and products based on the acquired technology and/or intellectual
property, and we may be subject to liabilities that are not covered by indemnification protection
we may obtain.
Defects or errors in our products and services or in products made by our suppliers could harm our
relations with our customers and expose us to liability. Similar problems related to the products
of our customers or licensees could harm our business. If we experience product liability claims or
recalls, we may incur significant expenses and experience decreased demand for our products.
Our products are inherently complex and may contain defects and errors that are detected only
when the products are in use. For example, as our chipset product complexities increase, we are
required to migrate to integrated circuit technologies with smaller geometric feature sizes. The
design process interface issues are more complex as we enter into these new domains of technology,
which adds risk to yields and reliability. Because our products and services are responsible for
critical functions in our customers products and/or networks, such defects or errors could have a
serious impact on our customers, which could damage our reputation, harm our customer relationships
and expose us to liability. Defects or impurities in our components, materials or software or those
used by our customers or licensees, equipment failures or other difficulties could adversely affect
our ability, and that of our customers and licensees, to ship products on a timely basis as well as
customer or licensee demand for our products. Any such shipment delays or declines in demand could
reduce our revenues and harm our ability to achieve or sustain desired levels of profitability. We
and our customers or licensees may also experience component or software failures or defects that
could require significant product recalls, rework and/or repairs that are not covered by warranty
reserves and which could consume a substantial portion of the capacity of our third-party
manufacturers or those of our customers or licensees. Resolving any defect- or failure-related
issues could consume financial and/or engineering resources that could affect future product
release schedules. Additionally, a defect or failure in our products or the products of our
customers or licensees could harm our reputation and/or adversely affect the growth of 3G wireless
markets.
Manufacturing, testing, marketing and use of our products and those of our licensees and
customers entail the risk of product liability. The use of wireless devices containing our products
to access untrusted content creates a risk of exposing the system software in those devices to
viral or malicious attacks. We continue to expand our focus on this issue and take measures to
safeguard the software from this threat. However, this issue carries the risk of general product
liability claims along with the associated impacts on reputation and demand. Although we carry
product liability insurance to protect against product liability claims, we cannot assure you that
our insurance coverage will be sufficient to protect us against losses due to product liability
claims, or that we will be able to continue to maintain such insurance at a reasonable cost.
Furthermore, not all losses associated with alleged product failure are insurable. Our inability to
maintain insurance at an acceptable cost or to protect ourselves in other ways
42
against potential product liability claims could prevent or inhibit the commercialization of our products and those
of our licensees and customers and harm our future operating results. In addition, a product
liability claim or recall, whether against our licensees, customers or us could harm our reputation
and result in decreased demand for our products.
FLO TV does not fully control promotional activities necessary to stimulate demand for our services
that are offered on a wholesale basis through the wireless operator channel.
As part of our FLO TV business, FLO TV provides mobile entertainment and information service
to our wireless operator partners on a wholesale basis. Under wholesale arrangements, we do not set
the retail price of our service, nor do we directly control all of the marketing and promotion of
the service to the wireless operators subscriber base. Therefore, we are dependent upon our
wireless operator partners to price, market and otherwise promote our service to their end users.
If our wireless operator partners do not effectively price, market and otherwise promote the
service offered through the wireless operator channel to their subscriber base, our ability to
achieve the subscriber and revenue targets contemplated in our business plan will be negatively
impacted.
Consumer acceptance and adoption of our MediaFLO technology and mobile commerce applications will
have a considerable impact on the success of our FLO TV and Firethorn businesses, respectively.
Consumer acceptance of our FLO TV and Firethorn service offerings is, and will continue to be,
affected by technology-based differences and by the operational performance, quality, reliability
and coverage of our wireless network and services platforms. Consumer demand could be impacted by
differences in technology, coverage and service areas, network quality, consumer perceptions,
program and service offerings and rate plans. We and our wireless operator and financial services
partners may have difficulty retaining subscribers if we are unable to meet subscriber expectations
for network quality and coverage, customer care, content or security. Obtaining content for our FLO
TV business that is appealing to subscribers on economically feasible terms may be limited by our
content provider partners inability to obtain the mobile rights to such programming. An inability
to address these issues could limit our ability to expand our subscriber base, placing us at a
competitive disadvantage, which could adversely affect our operating results. Additionally,
adoption and deployment of our MediaFLO technology could be adversely impacted by government
regulatory practices that support a single standard other than our technology, wireless operator
selection of competing technologies or consumer preferences.
If MediaFLO technology is not more widely adopted by consumers in the United States or
commercially deployed internationally, our investment in MediaFLO technology may not provide us an
adequate return. In addition, we are evaluating the FLO TV business model, including sale to, or
joint venture with, a third party and/or alternative uses of the spectrum licenses, technology and
network assets, if we do not achieve adequate consumer acceptance of our FLO TV service offerings
in the United States or based on other factors.
Our business and operating results will be harmed if we are unable to manage growth in our
business.
Certain of our businesses have experienced periods of rapid growth and/or increased their
international activities, placing significant demands on our managerial, operational and financial
resources. In order to manage growth and geographic expansion, we must continue to improve and
develop our management, operational and financial systems and controls, including quality control
and delivery and service capabilities. We also need to continue to expand, train and manage our
employee base. We must carefully manage research and development capabilities and production and
inventory levels to meet product demand, new product introductions and product and technology
transitions. We cannot assure you that we will be able to timely and effectively meet that demand
and maintain the quality standards required by our existing and potential customers and licensees.
In addition, inaccuracies in our demand forecasts, or failure of the systems used to develop
the forecasts, could quickly result in both insufficient or excessive inventories and
disproportionate overhead expenses. If we ineffectively manage our growth or are unsuccessful in
recruiting and retaining personnel, our business and operating results will be harmed.
Our stock price may be volatile.
The stock market in general, and the stock prices of technology-based and wireless
communications companies in particular, have experienced volatility that often has been unrelated
to the operating performance of any specific public company. The market price of our common stock
has fluctuated in the past and is likely to fluctuate in the future as well. Factors that may have
a significant impact on the market price of our stock include:
43
|
|
|
announcements concerning us or our competitors, including the selection of wireless
communications technology by wireless operators and the timing of the roll-out of those
systems; |
|
|
|
|
court or regulatory body decisions or settlements regarding intellectual property
licensing and patent litigation and arbitration; |
|
|
|
|
receipt of substantial orders or order cancellations for integrated circuits and
system software products; |
|
|
|
|
quality deficiencies in services or products; |
|
|
|
|
announcements regarding financial developments or technological innovations; |
|
|
|
|
international developments, such as technology mandates, political developments or
changes in economic policies; |
|
|
|
|
lack of capital to invest in 3G networks; |
|
|
|
|
new commercial products; |
|
|
|
|
changes in recommendations of securities analysts; |
|
|
|
|
general stock market volatility; |
|
|
|
|
disruption in the United States and foreign credit and financial markets affecting
both the availability of credit and credit spreads on investment securities; |
|
|
|
|
government regulations, including tax regulations; |
|
|
|
|
natural disasters, energy blackouts, acts of terrorism, widespread illness and war; |
|
|
|
|
inflation and deflation; |
|
|
|
|
concerns regarding global economic conditions that may impact one or more of the
countries in which we, our customers or our licensees compete; |
|
|
|
|
proprietary rights or product or patent litigation against us or against our
customers or licensees; |
|
|
|
|
strategic transactions, such as spin-offs, acquisitions and divestitures; |
|
|
|
|
unexpected and/or significant changes in the average selling price of our licensees
products; |
|
|
|
|
unresolved disputes with licensees that result in non-payment and/or non-recognition
of royalty revenues that may be owed to us; or |
|
|
|
|
rumors or allegations regarding our financial disclosures or practices. |
Our future earnings and stock price may be subject to volatility, particularly on a quarterly
basis. Shortfalls in our revenues or earnings in any given period relative to the levels expected
by securities analysts could immediately, significantly and adversely affect the trading price of
our common stock.
In the past, securities class action litigation often has been brought against a company
following periods of volatility in the market price of its securities. Due to changes in the
potential volatility of our stock price, we may be the target of securities litigation in the
future. Securities and patent litigation could result in substantial
uninsured costs and divert managements attention and resources. In addition, stock price
volatility may be precipitated by failure to meet earnings expectations or other factors.
Our industry is subject to rapid technological change, and we must make substantial investments in
new products, services and technologies to compete successfully.
New technological innovations generally require a substantial investment before they are
commercially viable. We intend to continue to make substantial investments in developing new
products and technologies, and it is possible that our development efforts will not be successful
and that our new technologies will not result in meaningful revenues. In particular, we intend to
continue to invest significant resources in developing integrated circuit products to support
high-speed wireless internet access and multimode, multiband, multinetwork operation and multimedia
applications, which encompass development of graphical display, camera and video capabilities, as
44
well as higher computational capability and lower power on-chip computers and signal processors. We
also continue to invest in the development of our Plaza and BREW applications development platform,
our MediaFLO MDS, MediaFLO technology and FLO TV service offering and our IMOD display technology.
Certain of these new products, services and technologies face significant competition, and we
cannot assure you that the revenues generated from these products or the timing of the deployment
of these products or technologies, which may be dependent on the actions of others, will meet our
expectations. We cannot be certain that we will make the additional advances in development that
may be essential to commercialize our IMOD technology successfully.
The market for our wireless products, services and technologies is characterized by many
factors, including:
|
|
|
rapid technological advances and evolving industry standards; |
|
|
|
|
changes in customer requirements and consumer expectations and preferences; |
|
|
|
|
frequent introductions of new products and enhancements; |
|
|
|
|
evolving methods for transmission of wireless voice and data communications; and |
|
|
|
|
intense competition from companies with greater resources, customer relationships and
distribution capabilities. |
Our future success will depend on our ability to continue to develop and introduce new
products, services, technologies and enhancements on a timely basis. Our future success will also
depend on our ability to keep pace with technological developments, protect our intellectual
property, satisfy customer requirements, meet consumer expectations, price our products and
services competitively and achieve market acceptance. The introduction of products embodying new
technologies and the emergence of new industry standards could render our existing products and
technologies, and products and technologies currently under development, obsolete and unmarketable.
If we fail to anticipate or respond adequately to technological developments or customer
requirements, or experience any significant delays in development, introduction or shipment of our
products and technologies in commercial quantities, demand for our products and our customers and
licensees products that use our technologies could decrease, and our competitive position could be
damaged.
Changes in assumptions used to estimate the values of certain share-based compensation have a
significant effect on our reported results.
We are required to estimate and record compensation expense in the statement of operations for
certain share-based payments, such as employee stock options and stock units, using the fair value
method. This method has a significant effect on our reported earnings, although it generally will
not affect our cash flows, and could adversely impact our ability to provide accurate guidance on
our future reported financial results due to the variability of the factors used to estimate the
values of such share-based payments. If factors change and/or we employ different assumptions or
different valuation methods in future periods, the compensation expense that we record may differ
significantly from amounts recorded previously, which could negatively affect our stock price and
our stock price volatility.
There are significant differences among valuation models, and there is a possibility that we
will adopt different valuation models in the future. This may result in a lack of consistency in
future periods and materially affect the
fair value estimate of certain share-based payments. It may also result in a lack of
comparability with other companies that use different models, methods and assumptions.
Theoretical valuation models and market-based methods are evolving and may result in lower or
higher fair value estimates for certain share-based compensation. The timing, readiness, adoption,
general acceptance, reliability and testing of these methods is uncertain. Sophisticated
mathematical models may require voluminous historical information, modeling expertise, financial
analyses, correlation analyses, integrated software and databases, consulting fees, customization
and testing for adequacy of internal controls. The uncertainties and costs of these extensive
valuation efforts may outweigh the benefits to our investors.
Potential tax liabilities could adversely affect our results.
We are subject to income taxes in both the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions.
Significant judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes. Although we believe
that our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of tax audits and any related
litigation could be materially different from that
45
which is reflected in historical income tax
provisions and accruals. In such case, a material effect on our income tax provision and net income
in the period or periods in which that determination is made could result. In addition, tax rules
may change that may adversely affect our future reported financial results or the way we conduct
our business. For example, we consider the operating earnings of certain non-United States
subsidiaries to be indefinitely invested outside the United States based on estimates that future
domestic cash generation will be sufficient to meet future domestic cash needs. No provision has
been made for United States federal and state or foreign taxes that may result from future
remittances of undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries. Our future reported financial
results may be adversely affected if accounting rules regarding unrepatriated earnings change, if
domestic cash needs require us to repatriate foreign earnings, or if the United States
international tax rules change as part of comprehensive tax reform or other tax legislation.
The high amount of capital required to obtain radio frequency licenses, deploy and expand wireless
networks and obtain new subscribers could slow the growth of the wireless communications industry
and adversely affect our business.
Our growth is dependent upon the increased use of wireless communications services that
utilize our technology. In order to provide wireless communications services, wireless operators
must obtain rights to use specific radio frequencies. The allocation of frequencies is regulated in
the United States and other countries throughout the world, and limited spectrum space is allocated
to wireless communications services. Industry growth may be affected by the amount of capital
required to: obtain licenses to use new frequencies; deploy wireless networks to offer voice and
data services; expand wireless networks to grow voice and data services; and obtain new
subscribers. The significant cost of licenses, wireless networks and subscriber additions may slow
the growth of the industry if wireless operators are unable to obtain or service the additional
capital necessary to implement or expand 3G wireless networks. Our growth could be adversely
affected if this occurs.
If wireless devices pose safety risks, we may be subject to new regulations, and demand for our
products and those of our licensees and customers may decrease.
Concerns over the effects of radio frequency emissions, even if unfounded, may have the effect
of discouraging the use of wireless devices, which may decrease demand for our products and those
of our licensees and customers. In recent years, the FCC and foreign regulatory agencies have
updated the guidelines and methods they use for evaluating radio frequency emissions from radio
equipment, including wireless phones and other wireless devices. In addition, interest groups have
requested that the FCC investigate claims that wireless communications technologies pose health
concerns and cause interference with airbags, hearing aids and medical devices. Concerns have also
been expressed over the possibility of safety risks due to a lack of attention associated with the
use of wireless devices while driving. Any legislation that may be adopted in response to these
expressions of concern could reduce demand for our products and those of our licensees and
customers in the United States as well as foreign countries.
Our QES and FLO TV businesses depend on the availability of satellite and other networks.
Our satellite-based mobile fleet management services are provided using leased Kurtz-under
band (Ku-band) satellite transponders in the United States, Mexico and Europe. Our primary data
satellite transponder and position
reporting satellite transponder lease for the system in the United States runs through
September 2012 and includes transponder and satellite protection (back-up capacity in the event of
a transponder or satellite failure). The service term of the transponder lease for the system in
Mexico runs through the end of May 2016 and has transponder protection. Our agreement with a third
party to provide network management and satellite space (including procuring satellite space) in
Europe expires in February 2013. We believe our agreements will provide sufficient transponder
capacity for our satellite-based operations through the expiration dates. A failure to maintain
adequate satellite capacity could harm our business, operating results, liquidity and financial
position. QES terrestrial-based products rely on wireless terrestrial communication networks
operated by third parties. The unavailability or nonperformance of these network systems could harm
our business.
Our FLO TV network and systems currently operate in the United States market on a leased
Ku-band satellite transponder. Our primary program content and data distribution satellite
transponder lease runs through December 2012 and includes transponder and satellite protection
(back-up capacity in the event of a transponder or satellite failure), which we believe will
provide sufficient transponder capacity for our United States FLO TV service through fiscal 2012.
Additionally, our FLO TV transmitter sites are monitored and controlled by a variety of
46
terrestrial-based data circuits relying on various terrestrial and satellite communication networks
operated by third parties. A failure to maintain adequate satellite capacity or the unavailability
or nonperformance of the terrestrial-based network systems could have an adverse effect on our
business and operating results.
Our business and operations would suffer in the event of system failures.
Despite system redundancy, the implementation of security measures and the existence of a
Disaster Recovery Plan for our internal information technology networking systems, our systems are
vulnerable to damages from computer viruses, unauthorized access, energy blackouts, natural
disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication failures. Any system failure, accident or security
breach that causes interruptions in our operations or in our vendors, customers or licensees
operations could result in a material disruption to our business. To the extent that any disruption
or security breach results in a loss or damage to our customers data or applications, or
inappropriate disclosure of confidential information, we may incur liability as a result. In
addition, we may incur additional costs to remedy the damages caused by these disruptions or
security breaches.
Data transmissions for QES operations are formatted and processed at the Network Management
and Data Center in San Diego, California, with a redundant backup Network Management and Data
Center located in Las Vegas, Nevada. Content from third parties for FLO TV operations is received,
processed and retransmitted at the Broadcast Operations Center in San Diego, California. Certain
Plaza and BREW products and services provided by our QIS operations are hosted at the Network
Operations Center in San Diego, California with a fully redundant backup Network Operations Center
located in Las Vegas, Nevada. The centers, operated by us, are subject to system failures, which
could interrupt the services and have an adverse effect on our operating results.
From time to time, we install new or upgraded business management systems. To the extent such
systems fail or are not properly implemented, we may experience material disruptions to our
business, delays in our external financial reporting or failures in our system of internal
controls, that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
We are subject to environmental and safety laws and regulations.
National, state and local environmental laws and regulations affect our operations around the
world. These laws may make it more expensive to manufacture, have manufactured and sell products.
It may also be difficult to comply with laws and regulations in a timely manner, and we may not
have compliant products available in the quantities requested by our customers, which may have an
adverse impact on our results of operations. We also recognize the potential for higher costs
driven by climate change regulations. Our costs could increase if our vendors (e.g., third-party
manufacturers or utility companies) pass on their costs to us.
As part of the development and commercialization of our IMOD display technology, we are
operating both a development and a production fabrication facility. The development and
commercialization of IMOD display prototypes is a complex and precise process involving restricted
materials subject to environmental and safety regulations. Our failure or inability to comply with
existing or future environmental and safety regulations could result in significant remediation
liabilities, the imposition of fines and/or the suspension or termination of development and
production activities.
Our stock repurchase program may not result in a positive return of capital to stockholders and may
expose us to counterparty risk.
At June 27, 2010, we had remaining authority to repurchase up to $1.8 billion of our common
stock. Since June 27, 2010, we have repurchased and retired 3,529,000 shares of our common stock
for $122 million. Our stock repurchases may not return value to stockholders because the market
price of the stock may decline significantly below the levels at which we repurchased shares of
stock. Our stock repurchase program is intended to deliver stockholder value over the long-term,
but stock price fluctuations can reduce the programs effectiveness.
As part of our stock repurchase program, we may sell put options or engage in structured
derivative transactions to reduce the cost of repurchasing stock. In the event of a significant and
unexpected drop in stock price, these arrangements may require us to repurchase stock at price
levels that are significantly above the then-prevailing market price of our stock. Such
overpayments may have an adverse effect on the effectiveness of our overall stock repurchase
program and may reduce value for our stockholders. In the event of financial insolvency or distress
of a counterparty to our put options, structured derivative transactions or 10b5-1 stock repurchase plan, we may be
47
unable to settle transactions if the counterparty does not provide us with
sufficient collateral to secure its net settlement obligations to us.
We cannot provide assurance that we will continue to declare dividends at all or in any particular
amounts.
We intend to continue to pay quarterly cash dividends subject to capital availability and
periodic determinations that cash dividends are in the best interest of our stockholders. Future
dividends may be affected by, among other items, our views on potential future capital
requirements, including those related to research and development, creation and expansion of sales
distribution channels and investments and acquisitions, legal risks, stock repurchase programs,
changes in federal and state income tax law and changes to our business model. Our dividend
payments may change from time to time, and we cannot provide assurance that we will continue to
declare dividends at all or in any particular amounts. A reduction in our dividend payments could
have a negative effect on our stock price.
Government regulation and policies of industry standards bodies may adversely affect our business.
Our products and services, and those of our customers and licensees, are subject to various
regulations, including FCC regulations in the United States and other international regulations, as
well as the specifications of national, regional and international standards bodies. Changes in the
regulation of our activities, including changes in the allocation of available spectrum by the
United States government and other governments or exclusion or limitation of our technology or
products by a government or standards body, could have a material adverse effect on our business,
operating results, liquidity and financial position.
We hold licenses in the United States from the FCC for the spectrum referred to as Block D in
the Lower 700 MHz Band (also known as TV Channel 55) covering the entire nation and spectrum
referred to as Block E in the Lower 700 MHz Band (also known as TV Channel 56) covering five
economic areas on the east and west coasts for use in our FLO TV business. In addition, we hold
licenses for the spectrum referred to as B Block in the Lower 700 MHz Band for use initially in our
various research and development initiatives. The FCC regulates our use of the licensed spectrum
pursuant to the terms of our licenses and the Federal Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and
pursuant to Part 27 of the FCCs rules, which are subject to a variety of ongoing FCC proceedings.
It is impossible to predict with certainty the outcome of pending FCC or other federal or state
regulatory proceedings and the potential impact to our FLO TV service or to our use of the spectrum
for which we hold licenses. Unless we are able to obtain relief, existing laws and regulations may
inhibit our ability to expand our business and to introduce new products and services. In addition,
the adoption of new laws or regulations or changes to the existing regulatory framework could
adversely affect our business plans. Furthermore, FCC regulations require that we meet certain
build-out requirements with respect to our Channel 56 spectrum at various dates beginning in June
2013. If we do not meet these requirements, the FCC could impose a fine or could rescind the
license in the area(s) in which the build-out requirements are not met.
We hold licenses in the United Kingdom from the Office of Communications (Ofcom) to use 40 MHz
of spectrum in the so-called L-Band (1452 MHz to 1492 MHz). These licenses give us the right to use
this spectrum throughout the entire United Kingdom. Ofcom regulates our use of this spectrum
pursuant to the terms of our
license and the United Kingdoms Wireless Technology Act of 2006. The adoption of new laws or
regulations or changes to the existing regulatory framework could adversely affect our business
plans.
We may not be able to attract and retain qualified employees.
Our future success depends largely upon the continued service of our board members, executive
officers and other key management and technical personnel. Our success also depends on our ability
to continue to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel. In addition, implementing our
product and business strategy requires specialized engineering and other talent, and our revenues
are highly dependent on technological and product innovations. The market for such specialized
engineering and other talented employees in our industry is extremely competitive. In addition,
existing immigration laws make it more difficult for us to recruit and retain highly skilled
foreign national graduates of U.S. universities, making the pool of available talent even smaller.
Key employees represent a significant asset, and the competition for these employees is intense in
the wireless communications industry. In the event of a labor shortage, or in the event of an
unfavorable change in prevailing labor and/or immigration laws, we could experience difficulty
attracting and retaining qualified employees. We continue to anticipate increases in human resource
needs, particularly in engineering. If we are unable to attract and retain the qualified employees
that we need, our business may be harmed.
48
We may have particular difficulty attracting and retaining key personnel in periods of poor
operating performance given the significant use of incentive compensation by our competitors. We do
not have employment agreements with our key management personnel and do not maintain key person
life insurance on any of our personnel. To the extent that new regulations make it less attractive
to grant share-based awards to employees or if stockholders do not authorize shares for the
continuation of equity compensation programs in the future, we may incur increased compensation
costs, change our equity compensation strategy or find it difficult to attract, retain and motivate
employees, each of which could materially and adversely affect our business.
Compliance with changing regulation of corporate governance, public disclosure and health care may
result in additional expenses.
Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance, public disclosure
and health care may create uncertainty regarding compliance matters. New or changed laws,
regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations in many cases. As a result, their
application in practice may evolve over time. We are committed to maintaining high standards of
corporate governance and public disclosure and complying with laws and regulations. Complying with
evolving interpretations of new or changed legal requirements may cause us to incur higher costs as
we revise current practices, policies, procedures, and/or health plans may divert management time
and attention from revenue generating to compliance activities. If our efforts to comply with new
or changed laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or
governing bodies due to ambiguities related to practice, our reputation might also be harmed.
Further, our board members, chief executive officer and chief financial officer could face an
increased risk of personal liability in connection with the performance of their duties. As a
result, we may have difficulty attracting and retaining qualified board members and executive
officers, which could harm our business.
Our charter documents and Delaware law could limit transactions in which stockholders might obtain
a premium over current market prices.
Our certificate of incorporation includes a provision that requires the approval of holders of
at least 66 2/3% of our voting stock as a condition to certain mergers or other business
transactions with, or proposed by, a holder of 15% or more of our voting stock. Under our charter
documents, stockholders are not permitted to call special meetings of our stockholders or to act by
written consent. These charter provisions may discourage certain types of transactions involving an
actual or potential change in our control, including those offering stockholders a premium over
current market prices. These provisions may also limit our stockholders ability to approve
transactions that they may deem to be in their best interests.
Further, our Board of Directors has the authority under Delaware law to fix the rights and
preferences of and issue shares of preferred stock, and our preferred share purchase rights
agreement will cause substantial dilution to the ownership of a person or group that attempts to
acquire us on terms not approved by our Board of Directors. While our Board of Directors approved
our preferred share purchase rights agreement to provide the board with
greater ability to maximize stockholder value, these rights could deter takeover attempts that
the board finds inadequate and make it more difficult to bring about a change in our ownership.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Financial market risks related to interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and equity
prices are described in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K. At June 27, 2010, there have been no
other material changes to the market risks described at September 27, 2009 except as described
below. Additionally, we do not anticipate any other near-term changes in the nature of our market
risk exposures or in managements objectives and strategies with respect to managing such
exposures.
Interest Rate Risk. The following table provides information about our interest-bearing cash
and cash equivalents and marketable securities and bank loan that are sensitive to changes in
interest rates. The table presents principal cash flows, weighted-average yield at cost and
contractual maturity dates. Additionally, we have assumed that the interest-bearing securities are
similar enough within the specified categories to aggregate the securities for presentation
purposes.
49
Interest Rate Sensitivity
Principal Amount by Expected Maturity
Average Interest Rates
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No Single |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Total |
|
Fixed interest-bearing securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
604 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
604 |
|
Interest rate |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade |
|
$ |
910 |
|
|
$ |
1,029 |
|
|
$ |
728 |
|
|
$ |
486 |
|
|
$ |
604 |
|
|
$ |
349 |
|
|
$ |
2,584 |
|
|
$ |
6,690 |
|
Interest rate |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Non-investment grade |
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
963 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
1,188 |
|
Interest rate |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
10.2 |
% |
|
|
9.9 |
% |
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating interest-bearing securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,626 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,626 |
|
Interest rate |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade |
|
$ |
197 |
|
|
$ |
785 |
|
|
$ |
443 |
|
|
$ |
196 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
417 |
|
|
$ |
577 |
|
|
$ |
2,649 |
|
Interest rate |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Non-investment grade |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
147 |
|
|
$ |
314 |
|
|
$ |
407 |
|
|
$ |
1,047 |
|
|
$ |
1,971 |
|
Interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan payable to banks |
|
$ |
1,061 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,061 |
|
Fixed interest rate |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents and available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair
value. The loan payable to bank approximates fair value.
Credit Market Risk. At June 27, 2010, a portion of our corporate cash in diversified
portfolios of fixed- and floating-rate, investment-grade marketable securities, mortgage- and
asset-backed securities, non-investment-grade bank loans and bonds, certain preferred stocks and
other securities continue to be affected by credit market concerns and had temporary gross
unrealized losses of $50 million. Although we consider these unrealized losses to be temporary,
there is a risk that we may incur net other-than-temporary impairment charges or realized losses on
the values of these and other similarly affected securities if they do not recover in value in the
coming quarters.
Equity Price Risk. We have a diversified marketable securities portfolio that includes equity
securities held by mutual and exchange-traded fund shares that are subject to equity price risk. We
have made investments in marketable equity securities of companies of varying size, style, industry
and geography, and changes in investment allocations may affect the price volatility of our
investments. A 10% decrease in the market price of our marketable equity securities and equity
mutual fund and exchange-traded fund shares at June 27, 2010 would cause a decrease in the carrying
amounts of these securities of $255 million. At June 27, 2010, gross unrealized losses of our
marketable equity securities and equity mutual and exchange-traded fund shares were $78 million.
Although we consider these unrealized losses to be temporary, there is a risk that we may incur net
other-than-temporary impairment charges or realized losses on the values of these securities if
they do not recover in value within a reasonable period.
Foreign Exchange Risk. We manage our exposure to foreign exchange market risks, when deemed
appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments, including foreign currency
forward and option contracts with financial counterparties. Such derivative financial instruments
are viewed as hedging or risk management tools and are not used for speculative or trading
purposes. At June 27, 2010, we had a net liability of $2 million related to foreign currency option
contracts that were designated as hedges of foreign currency risk on royalties earned from certain
international licensees on their sales of CDMA-based devices and a net liability of $3 million
related to foreign currency option contracts that have been rendered ineffective as a result of
changes in our forecast of royalty revenues. Counterparties to our derivative contracts are all
major banking institutions. In the event of the financial insolvency or distress of a counterparty
to our derivative financial instruments, we may be unable to settle transactions if the
counterparty does not provide us with sufficient collateral to secure its net settlement
obligations to us, which could materially impact our results. If our forecasted royalty revenues
were to decline by 30% and
50
foreign exchange rates were to change unfavorably by 30% for each of our
hedged foreign currencies, we would incur a loss of $1 million resulting from a decrease in the
fair value of the portion of our hedges that would be rendered ineffective. In addition, we are
subject to market risk on foreign currency option contracts that have been deemed ineffective. If
foreign exchange rates relevant to those contracts were to change unfavorably by 30%, we would
incur a loss of $58 million resulting from a decrease in the fair value of our hedges.
At June 27, 2010, we had a fixed-rate short-term bank loan of $1.1 billion, which is payable
in full in Indian rupees in December 2010. The loan is payable in the functional currency of our
consolidated subsidiary that is party to the loan, however we are subject to foreign currency
translation risk, which may impact the amount of our liability for principal repayment and interest
expense we record in the future. If the foreign currency exchange rate were to change unfavorably
by 20%, we would incur additional interest expense of $7 million throughout the remainder of the
contractual term of the loan.
Our analysis methods used to assess and mitigate the risks discussed above should not be
considered projections of future risks.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is
defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal
financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the
end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There were no changes in our internal
control over financial reporting during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Our current legal proceedings are disclosed in the notes to our condensed consolidated
financial statements. See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 8
Commitments and Contingencies. We are also engaged in other legal actions arising in the ordinary
course of our business that are not disclosed and believe that the ultimate outcome of these
actions will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity or
financial position.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
We have provided updated Risk Factors in the section labeled Risk Factors in Part I, Item 2,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. To reflect
risks resulting from the Broadband Wireless Access (BWA) spectrum recently won by us in the India
auction, we revised the Risk Factors entitled:
|
|
|
Currency fluctuations could negatively affect future product sales or royalty revenues,
harm our ability to collect receivables, or increase the U.S. dollar cost of the activities
of our foreign subsidiaries and international strategic investments; and |
|
|
|
|
We may engage in acquisitions or strategic transactions or make investments that could
result in significant changes or management disruption and fail to enhance stockholder
value. |
Other than with respect to the changes relating to the BWA spectrum auction, we do not believe
the updates to the Risk Factors have materially changed the type or magnitude of the risks we face
in comparison to the disclosure provided in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.
51
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Issuer purchases of equity securities during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 were (in
millions, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Purchased as Part of |
|
|
Value of Shares that May |
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Price Paid Per Share |
|
|
Publicly Announced |
|
|
Yet Be Purchased Under |
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
(1) |
|
|
Plans or Programs(2) |
|
|
the Plans or Programs(2) |
|
March 29, 2010 to
April 25, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 26, 2010 to
May 23, 2010 |
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
37.59 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
2,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 24, 2010 to
June 27, 2010 |
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
35.43 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
1,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
32.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Average Price Paid Per Share excludes cash paid for commissions. |
|
(2) |
|
On March 1, 2010, we announced that we had been authorized to
repurchase up to $3.0 billion of our common stock, and $1.8
billion of that amount remained available at June 27, 2010. The
stock repurchase program has no expiration date. Since June 27,
2010, we repurchased and retired 3,529,000 of our shares for
$122 million. |
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. [REMOVED AND RESERVED]
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibits |
|
|
3.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation. (1) |
3.2
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Designation. (2) |
3.4
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws. (3) |
10.88
|
|
Amended and Restated Qualcomm Incorporated 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. |
31.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Paul E. Jacobs. |
31.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for William E. Keitel. |
32.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Paul E. Jacobs. |
32.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for William E. Keitel. |
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document. (4) |
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema. (4) |
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase. (4) |
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase. (4) |
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase. (4) |
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase. (4) |
(1)
|
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended December 27, 2009. |
(2)
|
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September
30, 2005. |
(3)
|
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September
25, 2009. |
(4)
|
|
Furnished, not filed. |
52
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUALCOMM Incorporated
|
|
|
/s/ William E. Keitel
|
|
|
William E. Keitel |
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Dated: July 21, 2010 |
|
|
|
53