e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM to
Commission file number: 0-49983
SAIA, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
48-1229851 |
(State of incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
11465 Johns Creek Parkway, Suite 400
Johns Creek, GA
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
30097
(Zip Code) |
(770) 232-5067
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer, amd smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Outstanding Shares at April 28, 2008 |
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $.001 per share
|
|
13,448,602 |
Saia, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
5,332 |
|
|
$ |
6,656 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
116,352 |
|
|
|
107,116 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
42,577 |
|
|
|
37,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
164,261 |
|
|
|
151,609 |
|
Property and Equipment, at cost |
|
|
607,905 |
|
|
|
596,357 |
|
Less-accumulated depreciation |
|
|
236,732 |
|
|
|
227,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment |
|
|
371,173 |
|
|
|
368,772 |
|
Goodwill, net |
|
|
35,470 |
|
|
|
35,470 |
|
Other Intangibles, net |
|
|
3,640 |
|
|
|
3,860 |
|
Other Noncurrent Assets |
|
|
1,008 |
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
575,552 |
|
|
$ |
560,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and checks outstanding |
|
$ |
40,107 |
|
|
$ |
42,732 |
|
Wages, vacation and employees benefits |
|
|
34,652 |
|
|
|
32,862 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
39,023 |
|
|
|
38,138 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
12,793 |
|
|
|
12,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
126,575 |
|
|
|
126,525 |
|
Other Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
172,532 |
|
|
|
160,052 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
54,661 |
|
|
|
55,961 |
|
Claims, insurance and other |
|
|
21,897 |
|
|
|
17,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other liabilities |
|
|
249,090 |
|
|
|
233,406 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 50,000 shares authorized,
none issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized,
13,448,602 shares issued and outstanding at both
March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
170,563 |
|
|
|
170,260 |
|
Deferred compensation trust, 160,237 and 144,507 shares of
common stock at cost at March 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively |
|
|
(2,819 |
) |
|
|
(2,584 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
32,130 |
|
|
|
32,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
199,887 |
|
|
|
200,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
575,552 |
|
|
$ |
560,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Saia, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the quarter ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Operating Revenue |
|
$ |
249,329 |
|
|
$ |
231,827 |
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries, wages and employees benefits |
|
|
133,347 |
|
|
|
129,804 |
|
Purchased transportation |
|
|
18,983 |
|
|
|
16,167 |
|
Fuel, operating expenses and supplies |
|
|
66,474 |
|
|
|
50,394 |
|
Operating taxes and licenses |
|
|
8,963 |
|
|
|
8,321 |
|
Claims and insurance |
|
|
9,444 |
|
|
|
8,799 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
10,167 |
|
|
|
9,020 |
|
Operating gains, net |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(165 |
) |
Integration charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
247,347 |
|
|
|
224,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
1,982 |
|
|
|
7,060 |
|
Nonoperating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
3,186 |
|
|
|
2,204 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonoperating expenses, net |
|
|
3,283 |
|
|
|
2,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes |
|
|
(1,301 |
) |
|
|
5,008 |
|
Income Tax Provision (Benefit) |
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
1,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
(833 |
) |
|
$ |
3,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic |
|
|
13,299 |
|
|
|
14,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
13,299 |
|
|
|
14,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Saia, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the quarter ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from (used in) operating activitiescontinuing operations |
|
$ |
(360 |
) |
|
$ |
3,927 |
|
Net cash used in operating activitiesdiscontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from (used in) operating activities |
|
|
(360 |
) |
|
|
3,810 |
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of property and equipment |
|
|
(13,530 |
) |
|
|
(20,863 |
) |
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
Acquisition of business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,344 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(13,426 |
) |
|
|
(22,888 |
) |
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
21,013 |
|
Repayment of long-term debt |
|
|
(12,538 |
) |
|
|
(469 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,408 |
) |
Proceeds from stock option exercises |
|
|
|
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from financing activities |
|
|
12,462 |
|
|
|
15,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(1,324 |
) |
|
|
(3,701 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
6,656 |
|
|
|
10,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
5,332 |
|
|
$ |
6,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid, net |
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
192 |
|
Interest paid |
|
|
2,233 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Saia, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Saia, Inc. and its wholly owned regional transportation subsidiary, Saia Motor Freight Line, LLC
(together the Company or Saia). The financial statements include the financial position and
results of operations of The Connection Company (the Connection) since its acquisition date of
November 18, 2006 and Madison Freight Systems, Inc. (Madison Freight) since its acquisition date of
February 1, 2007.
The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company, without audit by
independent registered public accountants. In the opinion of management, all normal recurring
adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the statement of the financial position, results
of operations and cash flows for the interim periods included herein have been made. These interim
financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles for interim financial information, the instructions to Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Certain information and note disclosures normally
included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles have been condensed or omitted from these statements. The accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. Operating results for the quarter ended March 31,
2008, are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for the year
ended December 31, 2008.
Business
The Company provides regional and interregional less-than-truckload (LTL) services and selected
national LTL and time-definite services across the United States through its wholly owned
subsidiary, Saia Motor Freight Line, LLC (Saia Motor Freight).
Integration Charges
Integration charges totaling $2.4 million were expensed in the quarter ended March 31, 2007 in
connection with the acquisitions of the Connection and Madison Freight. These integration charges
consist of employee retention and stay bonuses, training, communications, fleet re-logoing,
technology integration and other related items.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements (Statement 157). Statement 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value and requires enhanced disclosures about fair value measurements. Statement
157 requires companies to disclose the fair value of financial instruments according to a fair
value hierarchy. Additionally, companies are required to provide certain disclosures regarding
instruments within the hierarchy, including a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances
for each major category of assets and liabilities. Statement 157 is effective for the Companys
fiscal year beginning January 1, 2008. In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Positions No. 157-1
and No. 157-2 which partially defer the effective date of Statement 157 for one year for certain
nonfinancial assets and liabilities and remove certain leasing transactions from its scope. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact of Statement 157, as amended, on its consolidated
financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, Fair Value Options for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities (Statement 159), which permits an entity to choose to measure many financial
instruments and certain other items at fair value at specified election dates. Statement 159 is
effective for the Companys fiscal year beginning January 1, 2008. The adoption of Statement 159
has not had a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements; however, the
Company will evaluate the manner in which the nonfinancial items covered by Statement 159 will be
adopted.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations
(Statement 141R). Statement 141R establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer
recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the
liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired.
Statement 141R also establishes disclosure requirements to enable the evaluation of the
6
nature and
financial effects of the business combination. Statement 141R is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company has adopted the most significant elements of
Statement 141R and the Company will assess the impact of the business combination provisions of
Statement 141R upon the occurrence of a business combination.
(2) Computation of Earnings Per Share
The calculation of basic earnings per common share and diluted earnings per common share was as
follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (Loss) |
|
$ |
(833 |
) |
|
$ |
3,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic earnings per share-weighted average common shares |
|
|
13,299 |
|
|
|
14,237 |
|
Effect of
dilutive stock options (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
227 |
|
Effect of
other common stock equivalents (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per share-adjusted weighted average common shares |
|
|
13,299 |
|
|
|
14,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
For the quarter ended March 31, 2008, options and other
common stock equivalents of 135,711 shares, which would have been dilutive, were excluded
from calculation of diluted earnings per share due to the net loss for the quarter. |
For the quarters ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 respectively, options for 278,300 and 117,360 shares
were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because their
effect was anti-dilutive.
(3) Commitments and Contingencies
Fuel Surcharge Litigation. In late July 2007, a lawsuit was filed in the United States District
Court for the Southern District of California against Saia and several other major LTL freight
carriers alleging that the defendants conspired to fix fuel surcharge rates in violation of federal
antitrust laws and seeking injunctive relief, treble damages and attorneys fees. Since the filing
of the original case, similar cases have been filed against Saia and other LTL freight carriers,
each with the same allegation of conspiracy to fix fuel surcharge rates. The cases have now been
consolidated and transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Georgia, and the plaintiffs in these cases are seeking class action certification. We believe that
these claims have no merit and intend to vigorously defend ourselves. We have also received an
indemnification claim related to the sale of Jevic Transportation, Inc. (Jevic) arising from these
lawsuits. Given the nature and status of the claims, we cannot yet determine the amount or a
reasonable range of potential loss, if any.
California Labor Code Litigation. The Company is a defendant in a lawsuit originally filed in July
2007 in California state court on behalf of California dock workers alleging various violations of
state labor laws. In August 2007, the case was removed to the United States District Court for the
Central District of California. The claims include the alleged failure of the Company to provide
rest and meal breaks and the alleged failure to reimburse the employees for the cost of work shoes,
among other claims. In January 2008, the parties negotiated a conditional class-wide settlement
under which the Company would pay $0.8 million to settle these claims. This settlement is subject
to court approval, which is now pending. The proposed settlement has been reflected as a liability
of $0.8 million as of March 31, 2008 and was recorded as other operating expenses in the fourth
quarter of 2007.
Other. The Company is subject to legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of its
business. In the opinion of management, the aggregate liability, if any, with respect to these
actions will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position but could
have a material adverse effect on the results of operations in a quarter or annual period.
7
(4) Debt and Financing Arrangements
At March 31, 2008 debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
Credit Agreement with Banks, described below |
|
$ |
36,186 |
|
|
$ |
48,724 |
|
Senior Notes under a Master Shelf Agreement,
described below |
|
|
135,000 |
|
|
|
110,000 |
|
Subordinated debentures, interest rate of 7.0%
semi-annual installment payments due from 2005 to 2011 |
|
|
14,139 |
|
|
|
14,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt |
|
|
185,325 |
|
|
|
172,845 |
|
Current Maturities |
|
|
12,793 |
|
|
|
12,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt |
|
$ |
172,532 |
|
|
$ |
160,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On September 20, 2002, Saia issued $100 million in Senior Notes under a $125 million (amended to
$150 million in April 2005) Master Shelf Agreement with Prudential Investment Management, Inc. and
certain of its affiliates. Saia issued another $25 million in Senior Notes on November 30, 2007
and $25 million in Senior Notes on January 31, 2008 under the same Master Shelf Agreement.
The initial $100 million Senior Notes are unsecured and have a fixed interest rate of 7.38 percent.
Payments due under the $100 million Senior Notes were interest only until June 30, 2006 and at
that time semi-annual principal payments began with the final payment due December 2013. The
November 2007 issuance of $25 million Senior Notes are unsecured and have a fixed interest rate of
6.14 percent. The January 2008 issuance of $25 million Senior Notes are unsecured and have a fixed
interest rate of 6.17 percent. Payments due for both recent $25 million issuances will be interest
only until June 30, 2011 and at that time semi-annual principal payments will begin with the final
payments due January 1, 2018. Under the terms of the Senior Notes, Saia must maintain certain
financial covenants including a maximum ratio of total indebtedness to earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation, amortization and rent (EBITDAR), a minimum interest coverage ratio and a
minimum tangible net worth, among others. At March 31, 2008, the Company was in compliance with
these covenants.
At December 31, 2007, Saia also had a $110 million Agented Revolving Credit Agreement (the Credit
Agreement) with Bank of Oklahoma, N.A., as agent. The Credit Agreement was unsecured with an
interest rate based on LIBOR or prime at the Companys option, plus an applicable spread, in
certain instances, and had a maturity date of January 2009. On January 28, 2008, Saia amended and
restated the Credit Agreement, increasing it to $160 million, extending the maturity to January 28,
2013 and adjusting the interest rate schedule. In addition, the financial covenants were revised
to a fixed charge coverage ratio, leverage ratio and adjusted leverage ratio, removing the minimum
tangible net worth test. At March 31, 2008, Saia had $36.2 million of borrowings under the Credit
Agreement, at an interest rate of 5.25 percent, $54.2 million in letters of credit outstanding
under the Credit Agreement and availability of $69.6 million. The available portion of the Credit
Agreement may be used for future capital expenditures, working capital and letter of credit
requirements as needed. Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, Saia must maintain several
financial covenants including a fixed charge coverage ratio, leverage ratio and adjusted leverage
ratio, among others. At March 31, 2008, Saia was in compliance with these covenants.
Based on the borrowing rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms and
remaining maturities, the estimated fair value of total debt at March 31, 2008 and December 31,
2007 is $199.5 million and $181.8 million, respectively.
The principal maturities of long-term debt for the next five years (in thousands) are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
2008 |
|
$ |
12,793 |
|
2009 |
|
|
18,938 |
|
2010 |
|
|
18,938 |
|
2011 |
|
|
22,196 |
|
2012 |
|
|
25,714 |
|
Thereafter through 2018 |
|
|
86,746 |
|
8
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This discussion should be read in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements and our 2007 audited consolidated financial statements included
in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. Those financial
statements include additional information about our significant accounting policies, practices and
the transactions that underlie our financial results.
Executive Overview
The Companys business is highly correlated to the general economy and, in particular, industrial
production. The Companys priorities are focused on increasing volume within existing geographies
while managing both the mix and yield of business to achieve increased profitability. The
Companys business is labor intensive, capital intensive and service sensitive. The Company looks
for opportunities to improve cost effectiveness, safety and asset utilization (primarily tractors
and trailers). Technology is important to supporting both customer service and operating
management. The Company grew operating revenue by 7.5 percent in the first quarter of 2008 over
the first quarter of 2007. Revenue growth was attributable to improvement in yield (revenue per
hundred weight) through increase length of haul and the impact of higher fuel surcharges.
Operating income was $2.0 million for the first quarter of 2008, a decrease from $7.1 million
recorded in the prior-year quarter. The prior year quarter results included integration costs of
$2.4 million due to the acquisition of the Connection Company and Madison Freight. The Company
recorded pre-tax expense of $0.5 million in the first quarter of 2008 for equity-based compensation
compared to a pre-tax expense of $0.3 million in the first quarter of 2007 as a result of the
impact of stock price changes in the respective periods. Net loss per share in the first quarter
of 2008 was $0.06 per share compared to earnings per share in the first quarter of 2007 of $0.21
per share. First quarter 2008 operating income was impacted by the soft freight environment,
escalating fuel prices and severe weather, along with higher costs. The operating ratio (operating
expenses divided by operating revenue) of 99.2 in the first quarter of 2008 compared to 97.0 in the
first quarter of 2007.
The Company had $0.4 million in cash used for operating activities through the first three months
of the year compared with $3.8 million generated in the prior-year period. The Company had net
cash used in investing activities of $13.4 million during the first three months of 2008 for the
purchase of property and equipment compared to $22.9 million in the first three months of 2007,
which included the acquisition of Madison Freight. The Companys cash from financing activities
during the first three months of 2008 included proceeds from borrowings on long-term debt of $25
million partially offset by $12.5 million of debt repayments. The Company had borrowings of $36.2
million on its credit agreement and a cash balance of $5.3 million as of March 31, 2008.
General
The following managements discussion and analysis describes the principal factors affecting the
results of operations, liquidity and capital resources, as well as the critical accounting policies
of Saia, Inc. (also referred to as Saia and the Company).
The Company is an asset-based transportation company based in Johns Creek, Georgia providing
regional and multi-regional LTL services and selected national LTL and guaranteed service solutions
to a broad base of customers across the United States through its wholly owned subsidiary, Saia
Motor Freight.
Our business is highly correlated to the general economy and, in particular, industrial production.
It also is impacted by a number of other factors as detailed in the Forward Looking Statements
section of this Form 10-Q. The key factors that affect our operating results are the volumes of
shipments transported through our network, as measured by our average daily shipments and tonnage;
the prices we obtain for our services, as measured by revenue per hundredweight (a measure of
yield) and revenue per shipment; our ability to manage our cost structure for capital expenditures
and operating expenses such as salaries, wages and benefits; purchased transportation; claims and
insurance expense; fuel and maintenance; and our ability to match operating costs to shifting
volume levels. Fuel surcharges have remained in effect for several years and are a significant
component of revenue and pricing. Fuel surcharges are a more integral part of annual customer
contract renewals, blurring the distinction between base price increases and recoveries under the
fuel surcharge program.
9
Results of Operations
Saia, Inc.
Selected Results of Operations and Operating Statistics
For the quarters ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
(in thousands, except ratios and revenue per hundredweight)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
08 v. 07 |
Operating Revenue |
|
$ |
249,329 |
|
|
$ |
231,827 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
% |
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries, wages and employees benefits |
|
|
133,347 |
|
|
|
129,804 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
Purchased transportation |
|
|
18,983 |
|
|
|
16,167 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
10,167 |
|
|
|
9,020 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
Fuel and other operating expenses |
|
|
84,850 |
|
|
|
69,776 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
Operating Income |
|
|
1,982 |
|
|
|
7,060 |
|
|
|
(71.9 |
) |
Operating Ratio |
|
|
99.2 |
% |
|
|
97.0 |
% |
|
|
2.3 |
|
Nonoperating Expense |
|
|
3,283 |
|
|
|
2,052 |
|
|
|
60.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working Capital |
|
|
37,686 |
|
|
|
18,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from (used in) Operations (year to date) |
|
|
(360 |
) |
|
|
3,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Acquisitions of Property and Equipment (year to date) |
|
|
13,426 |
|
|
|
20,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Statistics: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTL Tonnage |
|
|
913 |
|
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
Total Tonnage |
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTL Shipments |
|
|
1,653 |
|
|
|
1,704 |
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
Total Shipments |
|
|
1,678 |
|
|
|
1,728 |
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTL Revenue per hundredweight |
|
$ |
12.68 |
|
|
$ |
11.32 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
Total Revenue per hundredweight |
|
$ |
11.33 |
|
|
$ |
10.26 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2008 vs. Quarter ended March 31, 2007
Revenue and volume
Consolidated revenue increased 7.5 percent to $249.3 million as a result of higher yields including
the impact of increased length of haul and increased fuel surcharges partially offset by decreased
tonnage and weight per shipment primarily as a result of the difficult economic environment. Fuel
prices increased rapidly during 2008 and were only partially offset by the rise in fuel surcharge.
We have experienced cost increases in other operating costs as a result of increased fuel prices.
However, the total impact of higher energy prices on other non-fuel related expenses is difficult
to determine.
Saias LTL revenue per hundredweight (a measure of yield) increased 12 percent to $12.68 per
hundredweight for the first quarter of 2008 including the impact of fuel surcharges. Saias LTL
tonnage was down 4.4 percent to 0.9 million tons and LTL shipments were down 3.0 percent to 1.7
million shipments. Approximately 70 percent of Saia Motor Freights revenue is subject to
individual customer price adjustment negotiations that occur throughout the year. The remaining 30
percent of revenue is subject to an annual general rate increase. On February 18, 2008, Saia Motor
Freight implemented a 5.4 percent general rate increase for customers comprising this 30 percent of
revenue. Competitive factors, customer turnover and mix changes, among other things impact the
extent to which customer rate increases are retained over time.
Operating expenses and margin
Consolidated operating income of $2.0 million in the first quarter of 2008 compared to $7.1 million
in the prior year. The 2007 results include $2.4 million of pre-tax integration charges from the
acquisition of the Connection in November 2006 and Madison Freight in February 2007. The first
quarter 2008 operating ratio (operating expenses
10
divided by operating revenue) was 99.2 compared to
97.0 for the same period in 2007. However, excluding the integration charges from 2007, the
comparative operating ratios would have been 99.2 in the first quarter of 2008 versus 95.9 in the
same period in 2007. Higher fuel prices, in conjunction with volume changes due to increased
length of haul, caused $12.8 million of the increase in fuel, operating expenses and supplies.
Year-over-year yield increases were more than offset by cost increases in wages, health care and
depreciation and maintenance. Purchased transportation expenses increased 17.4 percent reflecting
both increased utilization driven by the opening of lanes to and from the acquired territories and
higher fuel prices. The annual wage rate increase for 2007 averaged 2.5 percent and was effective
December 1, 2007. Additionally, the first quarter of 2008 was adversely impacted by unusually
severe winter weather. The Company recorded pre-tax expense of $0.5 million in the first quarter
of 2008 for equity-based compensation compared to a pre-tax expense of $0.3 million in the first
quarter of 2007 as a result of the impact of stock price changes in the respective periods.
Equity-based compensation expense includes the expense for the cash-based awards under the
Companys long-term incentive plans, which is a function of the Companys stock price performance
versus a peer group, and the deferred compensation plans expense, which is tied to changes in the
Companys stock price.
Other
Substantially all non-operating expenses represent interest expense and the increase in net
non-operating expenses is a result of overall higher average debt balances during the first quarter
of 2008 versus the first quarter of 2007. The effective tax rate was 36.0 percent for the quarter
ended March 31, 2008 compared to 39.6 percent for the quarter ended March 31, 2007. The change in
the effective tax rate is primarily a result of lower forecasted income for 2008, along with the
impact of interest on uncertain tax positions. The Company currently expects its annual effective
tax rate to be approximately 41 percent.
Working capital/capital expenditures
Working capital at March 31, 2008 was $37.7 million, which increased from working capital at March
31, 2007 of $18.7 million due to increased net accounts receivable balances of $10.8 million due to
slower payments from customers resulting in increased days outstanding, as well as an increase in
income tax receivable of $7.2 million. Cash flows used in operating activities were $0.4 million
for the three-months ended March 31, 2008 versus cash from operations of $3.8 million for the
three-months ended March 31, 2007. For the quarter ended March 31, 2008 cash used in investing
activities was $13.4 million versus $22.9 million in the prior-year quarter primarily due to the
acquisition of Madison Freight and higher property and equipment purchases in 2007. The 2007
acquisition of property and equipment includes investments in real estate for terminals and in both
additions and replacement of revenue equipment and technology equipment and software. For the
quarter ended March 31, 2008, cash from financing activities was $12.5 million versus cash from
financing activities of $15.4 million for the prior-year quarter. Current year financing
activities included $25.0 million in proceeds from new senior notes partially offset by net
payments on the revolving credit facility of $12.5 million.
Outlook
Our business remains highly correlated to the success of Company specific improvement initiatives
as well as a variety of external factors, including the general economy. Given the volume trends
in 2007 and early 2008, there remains uncertainty as to the direction of the economy for the
balance of 2008. For 2008, we plan to continue to focus on providing top quality service and
improving safety performance while building density within our existing geography. Saia continues
to evaluate opportunities to grow and further increase profitability.
The Company plans to continue to pursue revenue and cost initiatives to improve profitability.
Planned revenue initiatives include, but are not limited to, building density and improving
performance in our current geography, targeted marketing initiatives to grow revenue in more
profitable segments, as well as pricing and yield management. The extent to which these revenue
initiatives are successful will be impacted by the underlying economic trends, competitor
initiatives and other factors discussed under Risk Factors.
Planned cost management initiatives include, but are not limited to, seeking gains in productivity
and asset utilization that collectively are designed to offset anticipated inflationary unit cost
increases in salaries and wage rates, healthcare, workers compensation, fuel and all the other
expense categories. Specific cost initiatives include linehaul routing optimization, reduction in
costs of purchased transportation, expansion of wireless dock technology and an enhanced weight and
inspection process. If the Company builds market share, there are numerous operating leverage cost
benefits. Conversely, should the economy soften from present levels, the Company plans to attempt
to match resources and capacity to shifting volume levels to lessen unfavorable operating leverage.
The success of cost improvement initiatives is also impacted by the cost and availability of
drivers and purchased transportation, fuel, insurance claims, regulatory changes, successful
implementation of profit improvement initiatives and other factors discussed under Risk Factors.
11
See Forward-Looking Statements for a more complete discussion of potential risks and uncertainties
that could materially affect our future performance.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (Statement 157).
Statement 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and requires
enhanced disclosures about fair value measurements. Statement 157 requires companies to disclose
the fair value of financial instruments according to a fair value hierarchy. Additionally,
companies are required to provide certain disclosures regarding instruments within the hierarchy,
including a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for each major category of assets
and liabilities. Statement 157 is effective for the Companys fiscal year beginning January 1,
2008. In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Positions No. 157-1 and No. 157-2 which partially
defer the effective date of Statement. 157 for one year for certain nonfinancial assets and
liabilities and remove certain leasing transactions from its scope. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of Statement 157 on its consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, Fair Value Options for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities (Statement 159), which permits an entity to choose to measure many financial
instruments and certain other items at fair value at specified election dates. Statement 159 is
effective for the Companys fiscal year beginning January 1, 2008. The adoption of Statement 159
has not had a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements; however, the
Company will evaluate the manner in which the nonfinancial items covered by Statement 159 will be
adopted.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations
(Statement 141R). Statement 141R establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer
recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the
liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired.
Statement 141R also establishes disclosure requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and
financial effects of the business combination. Statement 141R is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company has adopted the most significant elemsnt of
Statement 141R and the Company will assess the impact of the business combination provisions of
Statement 141R upon the occurrence of a business combination.
Financial Condition
The Companys liquidity needs arise primarily from capital investment in new equipment, land and
structures and information technology, letters of credit required under insurance programs, as well
as funding working capital requirements.
On September 20, 2002, Saia issued $100 million in Senior Notes under a $125 million (amended to
$150 million in April 2005) Master Shelf Agreement with Prudential Investment Management, Inc. and
certain of its affiliates. Saia issued another $25 million in Senior Notes on November 30, 2007
and $25 million in Senior Notes on January 31, 2008 under the same Master Shelf Agreement. At
March 31, 2008, a total of $135 million is outstanding under this Master Shelf Agreement.
The initial $100 million Senior Notes are unsecured and have a fixed interest rate of 7.38 percent.
Payments due under the $100 million Senior Notes were interest only until June 30, 2006 and at
that time semi-annual principal payments began with the final payment due December 2013. The
November 2007 issuance of $25 million Senior Notes are unsecured and have a fixed interest rate of
6.14 percent. The January 2008 issuance of $25 million Senior Notes are unsecured and have a fixed
interest rate of 6.17 percent. Payments due for both recent $25 million issuances will be interest
only until June 30, 2011 and at that time semi-annual principal payments will begin with the final
payments due January 1, 2018. Under the terms of the Senior Notes, Saia must maintain certain
financial covenants including a maximum ratio of total indebtedness to earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation, amortization and rent (EBITDAR), a minimum interest coverage ratio and a
minimum tangible net worth, among others. At March 31, 2008, the Company was in compliance with
these covenants.
At December 31, 2007 Saia also had a $110 million Agented Revolving Credit Agreement (the Credit
Agreement) with Bank of Oklahoma, N.A., as agent. The Credit Agreement was unsecured with an
interest rate based on LIBOR or prime at the Companys option, plus an applicable spread, in
certain instances, and had a maturity date of January 2009. On January 28, 2008, Saia amended and
restated the Credit Agreement, increasing it to $160 million, extending the maturity to January 28,
2013 and adjusting the interest rate schedule. In addition, the financial covenants were revised
to a fixed charge coverage ratio, leverage ratio and adjusted leverage ratio, removing the minimum
tangible net worth test. At March 31, 2008, Saia had $36.2 million of borrowings under the Credit
Agreement, $54.2 million in letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Agreement and
availability of $69.6
12
million. The available portion of the Credit Agreement may be used for
future capital expenditures, working capital and letter of credit requirements as needed. Under
the terms of the Credit Agreement, Saia must maintain several financial covenants including a fixed
charge coverage ratio, leverage ratio and adjusted leverage ratio, among others. At March 31,
2008, Saia was in compliance with these covenants.
At March 31, 2008, Yellow Corporation, now know as YRC Worldwide (Yellow), provided guarantees on
behalf of Saia primarily for open workers compensation claims and casualty claims incurred prior
to March 1, 2000. Under the Master Separation and Distribution Agreement entered into in
connection with the 100 percent tax-free distribution of shares to Yellow shareholders, Saia pays
Yellows actual cost of any collateral it provides to insurance underwriters in support of these
claims at cost plus 100 basis points through October 2008. At March 31, 2008, the portion of
collateral allocated by Yellow to Saia in support of these claims was $1.6 million.
Projected net capital expenditures for 2008 are now approximately $35 million primarily due to a
reduction in strategic real estate opportunities within Saias existing network. This represents
an approximately $54 million decrease from 2007 net capital expenditures for property and
equipment. Approximately $5.7 million of the 2008 capital budget was committed at March 31, 2008.
Net capital expenditures pertain primarily to replacement of revenue equipment and additional
investments in information technology, land and structures.
The Company has historically generated cash flows from operations that have funded its capital
expenditure requirements. Cash flows from operations were $46.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007, while net cash used in investing activities were $91.4 million. As such, the
$41.1 million cash from financing activities also supported capital expenditures in 2007. Cash
flows used in operations were $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. Thus the
funding for the $13.4 million of cash flows used in investing activities came from the $12.5
million cash from financing activities. Investing activities consisted exclusively of net capital
expenditures. Cash flows from operating activities were $4.2 million lower than the prior year
period primarily due to increased accounts receivable. The timing of capital expenditures can
largely be managed around the seasonal working capital requirements of the Company. The Company
has adequate sources of capital to meet short-term liquidity needs through its cash ($5.3 million
at March 31, 2008) and availability under its revolving credit facility ($69.6 million at March 31,
2008). Future operating cash flows are primarily dependent upon the Companys profitability and
its ability to manage its working capital requirements, primarily accounts receivable, accounts
payable and wage and benefit accruals. The Company has the ability to adjust its capital
expenditures in the event of a shortfall in anticipated operating cash flows. The Company believes
its current capital structure and availability under its borrowing facilities along with
anticipated cash flows from future operations will be sufficient to fund planned replacements of
revenue equipment, investments in technology and real estate. Additional sources of capital may be
needed to fund future long-term strategic growth initiatives.
In accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, our operating leases are not
recorded in our balance sheet; however, the future minimum lease payments are included in the
Contractual Cash Obligations table below. See the notes to our audited consolidated financial
statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 for
additional information. In addition to the principal amounts disclosed in the tables below, the
Company has interest obligations of approximately $12.0 million for 2008 and decreasing for each
year thereafter, based on borrowings outstanding at March 31, 2008.
Contractual Cash Obligations
The following tables set forth a summary of our contractual cash obligations and other commercial
commitments as of March 31, 2008 (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by year |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
Contractual cash obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving line of credit (1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
$ |
36.2 |
|
Long-term debt (1) |
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
22.2 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
|
|
|
50.6 |
|
|
|
149.1 |
|
Operating leases |
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
29.2 |
|
Purchase obligations (2) |
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations |
|
$ |
32.2 |
|
|
$ |
27.4 |
|
|
$ |
24.3 |
|
|
$ |
25.4 |
|
|
$ |
27.3 |
|
|
$ |
88.2 |
|
|
$ |
224.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes commitments of $5.7 million for capital expenditures. |
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of commitment expiration by year |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
Other commercial commitments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available line of credit |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
69.6 |
|
|
$ |
69.6 |
|
Letters of credit |
|
|
50.2 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.8 |
|
Surety bonds |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial
commitments |
|
$ |
55.1 |
|
|
$ |
6.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
69.6 |
|
|
$ |
131.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $3.3 million and accrued interest and
penalties of $1.2 million related to the unrecognized tax benefits as of March 31, 2008. The
Company cannot reasonably estimate the timing of cash settlement with respective taxing authorities
beyond one year and accordingly has not included the amounts within the above contractual cash
obligation and other commercial commitment tables.
The Company remains a guarantor under its indemnity agreement with certain insurance underwriters
with respect to Jevics self-insured retention (SIR) obligation for workers compensation, bodily
injury and property damage and general liability claims against Jevic arising out of occurrences
prior to the transaction date, which SIR obligation was estimated to be approximately $15.3 million
as of the June 30, 2006 transaction date. In connection with the transaction, Jevic provided
collateral in the form of a $15.3 million letter of credit with a third party bank in favor of the
Company. The amount of the letter of credit was reduced in April 2008 to $13.6 million following a
draw by the Company on the letter of credit to fund the SIR portion of a settlement of a bodily
injury claim against Jevic arising prior to the transaction date. Based on current estimates of
pending claims against Jevic, we do not anticipate material obligations or liabilities associated
with Jevics SIR obligation. See Note 3 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements
concerning an indemnification claim related to the sale of Jevic arising from the fuel surcharge
litigation.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Company makes estimates and assumptions in preparing the consolidated financial statements that
affect reported amounts and disclosures therein. In the opinion of management, the accounting
policies that generally have the most significant impact on the financial position and results of
operations of the Company include:
|
|
Claims and Insurance Accruals. The Company has self-insured retention limits
generally ranging from $250,000 to $2.0 million per claim for medical, workers compensation,
auto liability, casualty and cargo claims. For the policy year March 2003 through February
2004 only, the Company has an aggregate exposure limited to an additional $2.0 million above
its $1.0 million per claim deductible under its auto liability program. The liabilities
associated with the risk retained by the Company are estimated in part based on historical
experience, third-party actuarial analysis, demographics, nature and severity, past experience
and other assumptions. The liabilities for self-funded retention are included in claims and
insurance reserves based on claims incurred, with liabilities for unsettled claims and claims
incurred but not yet reported being actuarially determined with respect to workers
compensation claims and with respect to all other liabilities, estimated based on managements
evaluation of the nature and severity of individual claims and historical experience.
However, these estimated accruals could be significantly affected if the actual costs of the
Company differ from these assumptions. A significant number of these claims typically take
several years to develop and even longer to ultimately settle. These estimates tend to be
reasonably accurate over time; however, assumptions regarding severity of claims, medical cost
inflation, as well as specific case facts can create short-term volatility in estimates. |
|
|
|
Revenue Recognition and Related Allowances. Revenue is recognized on a
percentage-of-completion basis for shipments in transit while expenses are recognized as
incurred. In addition, estimates included in the recognition of revenue and accounts
receivable include estimates of shipments in transit and estimates of future adjustments to
revenue and accounts receivable for billing adjustments and collectibility. |
|
|
|
Revenue is recognized in a systematic process whereby estimates of shipments in transit are
based upon actual shipments picked up, scheduled day of delivery and current trend in average
rates charged to customers. Since the cycle for pick up and delivery of shipments is
generally 1-3 days, typically less than 5 percent of a total months revenue is in transit at
the end of any month. Estimates for credit losses and billing adjustments are based upon
historical experience of credit losses, adjustments processed and trends of |
14
|
|
collections.
Billing adjustments are primarily made for discounts and billing corrections. These estimates
are continuously evaluated and updated; however, changes in economic conditions, pricing
arrangements and other factors can significantly impact these estimates. |
|
|
|
Depreciation and Capitalization of Assets. Under the Companys accounting policy
for property and equipment, management establishes appropriate depreciable lives and salvage
values for the Companys revenue equipment (tractors and trailers) based on their estimated
useful lives and estimated fair values to be received when the equipment is sold or traded in.
These estimates are routinely evaluated and updated when circumstances warrant. However,
actual depreciation and salvage values could differ from these assumptions based on market
conditions and other factors. |
|
|
|
Goodwill. In connection with its acquisition of Clark Bros. Transit, Inc. in 2004,
the Connection in 2006 and Madison Freight in 2007, the Company allocated purchase price based
on independent appraisals of intangible assets and real property and managements estimates of
valuations of other tangible assets. Annually, the Company assesses goodwill impairment by
applying a fair value based test. This fair value based test involves assumptions regarding
the long-term future performance of the Company, fair value of the assets and liabilities of
the Company, cost of capital rates and other assumptions. However, actual recovery of
remaining goodwill could differ from these assumptions based on market conditions and other
factors. In the event remaining goodwill is determined to be impaired, a charge to earnings
would be required. |
|
|
|
Equity-based Incentive Compensation. The Company maintains long-term incentive
compensation arrangements in the form of stock options, restricted stock, cash-based awards
and stock-based awards. The criteria for the cash-based and stock-based awards are total
shareholder return versus a peer group of companies over a three year performance period. The
Company accrues for cash-based award expenses based on performance criteria from the beginning
of the performance period through the reporting date. This results in the potential for
significant adjustments from period to period that cannot be predicted. The Company accounts
for its stock-based awards in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement
No. 123R with the expense amortized over the three year vesting period based on the Monte
Carlo fair value at the date the stock-based awards are granted. The Company accounts for
stock options in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 123R with
option expense amortized over the three year vesting period based on the Black-Scholes-Merton
fair value at the date the options are granted. See discussion of adoption of Statement No.
123R in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Companys annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and the Saia, Inc. Amended and
Restated 2003 Omnibus Incentive Plan included in the Companys Definitive Proxy Statement on
Schedule 14A filed on March 16, 2007. |
These accounting policies, and others, are described in further detail in the notes to our audited
consolidated financial statements included in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2007.
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States requires management to adopt accounting policies and make significant
judgments and estimates to develop amounts reflected and disclosed in the financial statements. In
many cases, there are alternative policies or estimation techniques that could be used. We maintain
a thorough process to review the application of our accounting policies and to evaluate the
appropriateness of the many estimates that are required to prepare the financial statements.
However, even under optimal circumstances, estimates routinely require adjustment based on changing
circumstances and the receipt of new or better information.
Forward-Looking Statements
Statements in this report regarding the Company and its business, which are not historical facts
are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are made in
accordance with the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as anticipate,
estimate, expect, project, intend, may, plan, predict, believe, seek, should,
and similar words or expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We use such
forward-looking statements regarding our future financial condition and results of operations and
our business operations in this Form 10-Q. Investors should not place undue reliance on such
forward-looking statements, and the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise
any forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements reflect the present expectation of
future events of our management and are subject to a number of important factors, risks,
uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
described in the forward-looking statements. These factors and risks include, but are not limited
to, general economic conditions; indemnification obligations associated with the sale of Jevic; the
effect of ongoing litigation including class action lawsuits; cost and availability of qualified
drivers, fuel,
15
purchased transportation, property, revenue equipment and other operating assets;
governmental regulations, including but not limited to Hours of Service, engine emissions,
compliance with legislation requiring companies to evaluate their internal control over financial
reporting and Homeland Security; dependence on key employees; inclement weather; labor relations;
integration risks; effectiveness of company-specific performance improvement initiatives;
competitive initiatives and pricing pressures; terrorism risks; self-insurance claims, equity-based
compensation and other expense volatility; and other financial, operational and legal risks and
uncertainties detailed from time to time in the Companys SEC filings. These factors and risks are
described in Item 1A: Risk Factors of the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007, as updated by Item 1A of this Form 10-Q.
As a result of these and other factors, no assurance can be given as to our future results and
achievements. Accordingly, a forward-looking statement is neither a prediction nor a guarantee of
future events or circumstances, and those future events or circumstances may not occur. You should
not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this
Form 10-Q. We are under no obligation, and we expressly disclaim any obligation, to update or alter
any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company is exposed to a variety of market risks, including the effects of interest rates and
fuel prices. The detail of the Companys debt structure is more fully described in the notes to
the consolidated financial statements set forth in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2007. To help mitigate our risk to rising fuel prices, the Company has
implemented a fuel surcharge program. This program is well established within the industry and
customer acceptance of fuel surcharges remains high. Since the amount of fuel surcharge is based
on average national diesel fuel prices and is reset weekly, exposure of the Company to fuel price
volatility is significantly reduced. However, the fuel surcharge may not fully compensate the
Company for increased fuel prices during periods of rapid increases in the price of fuel.
The following table provides information about the Companys third-party financial instruments as
of March 31, 2008. The table presents principal cash flows (in millions) and related weighted
average interest rates by contractual maturity dates. The fair value of the fixed rate debt was
estimated based upon the borrowing rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar
terms and remaining maturities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected maturity date |
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|
Fair Value |
Fixed rate debt |
|
$ |
12.8 |
|
|
$ |
18.9 |
|
|
$ |
18.9 |
|
|
$ |
22.2 |
|
|
$ |
25.7 |
|
|
$ |
50.6 |
|
|
$ |
149.1 |
|
|
$ |
163.3 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
7.33 |
% |
|
|
7.34 |
% |
|
|
7.35 |
% |
|
|
7.09 |
% |
|
|
6.93 |
% |
|
|
6.40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
36.2 |
|
|
$ |
36.2 |
|
|
$ |
36.2 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Quarterly Controls Evaluation and Related CEO and CFO Certifications
As of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q, the Company conducted an evaluation of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (Disclosure
Controls). The controls evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation
of management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer
(CFO).
Based upon the controls evaluation, the Companys CEO and CFO have concluded that, subject to the
limitations noted below, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q,
the Companys Disclosure Controls are effective to ensure that information the Company is required
to disclose in reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the Exchange Act) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in SEC rules and forms.
16
During the period covered by this Form 10-Q, there were no changes in internal control over
financial reporting that materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect,
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Attached as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this Form 10-Q are certifications of the CEO and the CFO,
which are required in accordance with Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act. This Controls and Procedures
section includes the information concerning the controls evaluation referred to in the
certifications and it should be read in conjunction with the certifications.
Definition of Disclosure Controls
Disclosure Controls are controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in the Companys reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported timely. Disclosure Controls are also designed to ensure that such information is
accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate
to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Companys Disclosure Controls include
components of its internal control over financial reporting, which consists of control processes
designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of the Companys financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls
The Companys management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that its Disclosure Controls
or its internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control
system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute,
assurance that the control systems objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system
must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be
considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of
fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the
realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of
simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons,
by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. Because of the
inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may
occur and not be detected.
17
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
For a description of all material pending legal proceedings, see Note 3
of the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Risk Factors are described in Item 1A: Risk Factors of the Companys
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and there have been no material
changes.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total Number |
|
Number (or |
|
|
(a) Total |
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares (or |
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
Number of |
|
(b) Average |
|
Units) Purchased |
|
Value) of Shares (or |
|
|
Shares (or |
|
Price Paid per |
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
Units) that May Yet |
|
|
Units) |
|
Share (or |
|
Announced Plans |
|
be Purchased under |
Period |
|
Purchased (1) |
|
Unit) |
|
or Programs |
|
the Plans or Programs |
January 1, 2008 through
January 31, 2008 |
|
|
770 |
(2) |
|
$ |
11.90 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
February 1, 2008 through February 29, 2008 |
|
|
1,600 |
(3) |
|
|
14.86 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2008 through
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
14,300 |
(4) |
|
|
15.30 |
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
16,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Shares purchased by the SCST Executive Capital Accumulation Plan were open market purchases.
For more information on the SCST Executive Capital Accumulation Plan see the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-103661) filed on March 7, 2003. |
|
(2) |
|
The SCST Executive Capital Accumulation Plan sold no shares of Saia stock on the open market
during the period of January 1, 2008 through January 31, 2008. |
|
(3) |
|
The SCST Executive Capital Accumulation Plan sold 940 shares of Saia stock on the open market
at $14.55 during the period of February 1, 2008 through February 29, 2008. |
|
(4) |
|
The SCST Executive Capital Accumulation Plan sold no shares of Saia stock on the open market
during the period of March 1, 2008 through March 31, 2008. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
(a) |
|
On April 24, 2008, Saia held its Annual Meeting of Shareholders |
|
(b) |
|
The following directors were elected for three-year terms with the indicated number of votes
set forth below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
|
Against |
|
|
Abstain |
|
Linda J. French |
|
|
12,011,367 |
|
|
|
194,156 |
|
|
|
125,861 |
|
William F. Martin, Jr. |
|
|
12,019,982 |
|
|
|
189,273 |
|
|
|
122,129 |
|
Björn E. Olsson |
|
|
12,015,795 |
|
|
|
193,457 |
|
|
|
122,132 |
|
18
Continuing Directors:
John J. Holland
Richard D. ODell
James A. Olson
Douglas W. Rockel
Herbert A. Trucksess, III
Jeffrey C. Ward
(c) |
|
The proposal for the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as Independent Auditors for
2008 was voted on and approved at the meeting by the following vote: For: 12,163,394,
Against: 54,726, Abstain: 113,264. |
Item 5. Other Information None
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Saia, Inc. (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Saia, Inc.s Form 8-K (File No. 0-49983) filed on
July 26, 2006). |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Saia, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 of Saia, Inc.s Form 8-K (File No. 0-49983) filed on December 11, 2007). |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Rights Agreement between SCS Transportation, Inc. and Mellon Investor Services LLC
dated as of September 30, 2002 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of
SCS Transportation, Inc.s Form 10-Q (File No. 0-49983) for the quarter ended
September 30, 2002). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
19
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAIA, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: April 30, 2008
|
|
/s/ James A. Darby
James A. Darby
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President of Finance and |
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
20
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Saia, Inc. (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Saia, Inc.s Form 8-K (File No. 0-49983) filed on
July 26, 2006). |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Saia, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 of Saia, Inc.s Form 8-K (File No. 0-49983) filed on July 26, 2006). |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Rights Agreement between SCS Transportation, Inc. and Mellon Investor Services LLC
dated as of September 30, 2002 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of
SCS Transportation, Inc.s Form 10-Q (File No. 0-49983) for the quarter ended
September 30, 2002). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
E-1