x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013. | ||
OR | ||
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the transition period from to |
Delaware | 31-0595760 |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
incorporation or organization) | |
1221 Broadway | |
Oakland, California | 94612-1888 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip code) |
(510)
271-7000 |
||
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No c
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer c | Non-accelerated filer c |
Smaller Reporting Company c |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes c No þ
As of October 30, 2013, there were 129,044,616 shares outstanding of the registrants common stock ($1.00 par value).
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The Clorox Company
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings and
Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share
amounts)
Three Months Ended | ||||||
9/30/2013 | 9/30/2012 | |||||
Net sales | $ | 1,364 | $ | 1,338 | ||
Cost of products sold | 779 | 764 | ||||
Gross profit | 585 | 574 | ||||
Selling and administrative expenses | 198 | 195 | ||||
Advertising costs | 120 | 122 | ||||
Research and development costs | 31 | 30 | ||||
Interest expense | 26 | 33 | ||||
Other expense, net | 2 | - | ||||
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes | 208 | 194 | ||||
Income taxes on continuing operations | 71 | 61 | ||||
Earnings from continuing operations | 137 | 133 | ||||
Losses from discontinued operations, net of tax | (1 | ) | - | |||
Net earnings | $ | 136 | $ | 133 | ||
Net earnings (losses) per share | ||||||
Basic | ||||||
Continuing operations | $ | 1.05 | $ | 1.02 | ||
Discontinued operations | (0.01 | ) | - | |||
Basic net earnings per share | $ | 1.04 | $ | 1.02 | ||
Diluted | ||||||
Continuing operations | $ | 1.04 | $ | 1.01 | ||
Discontinued operations | (0.01 | ) | - | |||
Diluted net earnings per share | $ | 1.03 | $ | 1.01 | ||
Weighted average shares outstanding (in thousands) | ||||||
Basic | 130,074 | 130,268 | ||||
Diluted | 132,237 | 131,702 | ||||
Dividend declared per share | $ | 0.71 | $ | 0.64 | ||
Comprehensive income | $ | 135 | $ | 160 |
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
3
The Clorox Company
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
9/30/2013 | 6/30/2013 | ||||||
(Unaudited) | |||||||
ASSETS | |||||||
Current assets | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 323 | $ | 299 | |||
Receivables, net | 506 | 580 | |||||
Inventories, net | 439 | 394 | |||||
Other current assets | 152 | 147 | |||||
Total current assets | 1,420 | 1,420 | |||||
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation | |||||||
and amortization of $1,720 and $1,711, respectively | 1,007 | 1,021 | |||||
Goodwill | 1,108 | 1,105 | |||||
Trademarks, net | 553 | 553 | |||||
Other intangible assets, net | 70 | 74 | |||||
Other assets | 143 | 138 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 4,301 | $ | 4,311 | |||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY | |||||||
Current liabilities | |||||||
Notes and loans payable | $ | 286 | $ | 202 | |||
Accounts payable | 374 | 413 | |||||
Accrued liabilities | 468 | 490 | |||||
Income taxes payable | 42 | 29 | |||||
Total current liabilities | 1,170 | 1,134 | |||||
Long-term debt | 2,170 | 2,170 | |||||
Other liabilities | 762 | 742 | |||||
Deferred income taxes | 118 | 119 | |||||
Total liabilities | 4,220 | 4,165 | |||||
Contingencies | |||||||
Stockholders equity | |||||||
Preferred stock: $1.00 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none | |||||||
issued or outstanding | - | - | |||||
Common stock: $1.00 par value; 750,000,000 shares authorized; 158,741,461 shares | |||||||
issued at both September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013; and 128,996,021 and 130,366,911 | |||||||
shares outstanding at September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, respectively | 159 | 159 | |||||
Additional paid-in capital | 673 | 661 | |||||
Retained earnings | 1,603 | 1,561 | |||||
Treasury shares, at cost: 29,745,440 and 28,374,550 shares | |||||||
at September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, respectively | (1,986 | ) | (1,868 | ) | |||
Accumulated other comprehensive net losses | (368 | ) | (367 | ) | |||
Stockholders equity | 81 | 146 | |||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity | $ | 4,301 | $ | 4,311 |
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4
The Clorox Company
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
9/30/2013 | 9/30/2012 | |||||||
Operating activities: | ||||||||
Net earnings | $ | 136 | $ | 133 | ||||
Deduct: Losses from discontinued operations, net of tax | (1 | ) | - | |||||
Earnings from continuing operations | 137 | 133 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile earnings from continuing operations to net cash | ||||||||
provided by continuing operations: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 44 | 44 | ||||||
Share-based compensation | 10 | 8 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | (1 | ) | 15 | |||||
Other | 11 | 17 | ||||||
Changes in: | ||||||||
Receivables, net | 74 | 80 | ||||||
Inventories, net | (44 | ) | (32 | ) | ||||
Other current assets | (7 | ) | 1 | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | (63 | ) | (68 | ) | ||||
Income taxes payable | 18 | 10 | ||||||
Net cash provided by continuing operations | 179 | 208 | ||||||
Net cash used for discontinued operations | (1 | ) | - | |||||
Net cash provided by operations | 178 | 208 | ||||||
Investing activities: | ||||||||
Capital expenditures | (27 | ) | (54 | ) | ||||
Net cash used for investing activities | (27 | ) | (54 | ) | ||||
Financing activities: | ||||||||
Notes and loans payable, net | 84 | (297 | ) | |||||
Long-term debt borrowings, net of issuance costs | - | 594 | ||||||
Treasury stock purchased | (130 | ) | - | |||||
Cash dividends paid | (93 | ) | (83 | ) | ||||
Issuance of common stock for employee stock plans and other | 11 | 28 | ||||||
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities | (128 | ) | 242 | |||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | 1 | 4 | ||||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 24 | 400 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents: | ||||||||
Beginning of period | 299 | 267 | ||||||
End of period | $ | 323 | $ | 667 |
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5
The Clorox Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
NOTE 1. INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Basis of Presentation
The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated results of operations, financial position and cash flows of The Clorox Company and its subsidiaries (the Company) for the periods presented. The results for the interim period ended September 30, 2013, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014, or for any other future period.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) have been omitted or condensed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The information in this report should be read in conjunction with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, which includes a complete set of footnote disclosures, including the Companys significant accounting policies.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and related disclosures. Actual results could differ materially from estimates and assumptions made.
NOTE 2. INVENTORIES, NET
Inventories, net, consisted of the following as of:
9/30/2013 | 6/30/2013 | ||||||
Finished goods | $ | 364 | $ | 321 | |||
Raw materials and packaging | 120 | 121 | |||||
Work in process | 3 | 3 | |||||
LIFO allowances | (39 | ) | (40 | ) | |||
Allowances for obsolescence | (9 | ) | (11 | ) | |||
Total | $ | 439 | $ | 394 |
6
NOTE 3. OTHER ASSETS
Investments in Low-Income Housing Partnerships
The Company owns, directly or indirectly, limited partnership interests in low-income housing partnerships, which are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. The Company’s investment balance as of both September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013 was $6. These partnerships are considered to be variable interest entities; however, the Company does not consolidate them because it does not have the power to direct the activities of the partnerships that significantly impact their economic performance. The purpose of the partnerships is to develop and operate low-income housing rental properties. The general partners, who typically hold 1% of the partnership interests, are third parties unrelated to the Company and its affiliates, and are responsible for controlling and managing the business and financial operations of the partnerships. As a limited partner, the Company is not responsible for any of the liabilities and obligations of the partnerships nor do the partnerships or their creditors have any recourse to the Company other than for the capital requirements. All available tax benefits from low-income housing tax credits provided by the partnerships were claimed as of fiscal year 2012. The risk that previously claimed low-income housing tax credits might be recaptured or otherwise retroactively invalidated is considered remote.
NOTE 4. OTHER LIABILITIES
Other liabilities consisted of the following as of:
9/30/2013 | 6/30/2013 | ||||
Employee benefit obligations | $ | 287 | $ | 270 | |
Venture agreement net terminal obligation | 286 | 284 | |||
Taxes | 76 | 74 | |||
Other | 113 | 114 | |||
Total | $ | 762 | $ | 742 |
7
NOTE 5. NET EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following is the reconciliation of the weighted average number of shares outstanding (in thousands) used to calculate basic net earnings per share (EPS) to those used to calculate diluted net EPS:
Three Months Ended | |||
9/30/2013 | 9/30/2012 | ||
Basic | 130,074 | 130,268 | |
Dilutive effect of stock options and other | 2,163 | 1,434 | |
Diluted | 132,237 | 131,702 |
During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company excluded stock options to purchase approximately 1.8 million shares of the Companys common stock in the calculations of diluted net EPS because their exercise price was greater than the average market price, making them anti-dilutive.
During the three months ended September 30, 2012, the Company included all stock options to purchase shares of the Companys common stock in the calculations of diluted net EPS because the average market price of all outstanding grants was greater than the exercise price.
The Company has two share repurchase programs: an open-market purchase program with an authorized aggregate purchase amount of up to $750, all of which was available for share repurchases as of September 30, 2013, and a program to offset the impact of share dilution related to share-based awards (the Evergreen Program), which has no authorization limit as to amount or timing of repurchases.
During the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company repurchased approximately 1.6 million shares and zero shares, respectively, under its Evergreen Program, for an aggregate amount of $130 and $0, respectively. The Company did not repurchase any shares under the open-market purchase program during the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.
8
NOTE 6. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Comprehensive income is defined as net earnings and other changes in stockholders equity from transactions and other events from sources other than stockholders. Comprehensive income was as follows:
Three Months Ended | |||||||
9/30/2013 | 9/30/2012 | ||||||
Net earnings | $ | 136 | $ | 133 | |||
Other comprehensive (loss) income: | |||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax of $1 and $3, respectively | 4 | 27 | |||||
Net unrealized losses on derivatives, net of tax of $1 and $1, respectively | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | |||
Pension and postretirement benefit adjustments, net of tax of $2 and $0, respectively | (4 | ) | 1 | ||||
Total other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax | (1 | ) | 27 | ||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 135 | $ | 160 |
On February 5, 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an update to current accounting standards related to disclosures of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The presentation requirements were adopted by the Company effective July 1, 2013 and are reflected below.
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive net losses by component were as follows:
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
Net
unrealized losses on derivatives |
Pension
and postretirement benefit adjustments |
Total | |||||||||||||
Balance as of June 30, 2013, net of tax | $ | (209 | ) | $ | (30 | ) | $ | (128 | ) | $ | (367 | ) | ||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) | ||||||||||||||||
before reclassifications | 4 | (1 | ) | (5 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other | ||||||||||||||||
comprehensive net losses | - | - | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Net other comprehensive income (loss) | 4 | (1 | ) | (4 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||||
Balance as of September 30, 2013, net of tax | $ | (205 | ) | $ | (31 | ) | $ | (132 | ) | $ | (368 | ) |
Pension and postretirement benefit reclassification adjustments are reflected in cost of products sold and selling and administrative expenses.
9
NOTE 7. INCOME TAXES
In determining its quarterly provision for income taxes, the Company uses an estimated annual effective tax rate, which is based on expected annual income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available in the various jurisdictions in which the Company operates. Certain significant or unusual items are separately recognized in the quarter in which they occur and can be a source of variability in the effective tax rates from quarter to quarter. The effective tax rate on earnings from continuing operations was 34.1% and 31.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
The balance of unrecognized tax benefits as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, included potential benefits of $58 and $56, respectively, which, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate on earnings.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense. The total balance of accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions was $9 and $8 as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, respectively. Interest and penalties included in income tax expense resulted in a net expense of $1 and a net benefit of $6 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
The Company files income tax returns in U.S. federal and various state, local and foreign jurisdictions. The federal statute of limitations has expired for all tax years through June 30, 2009. Various income tax returns in state and foreign jurisdictions are currently in the process of examination.
NOTE 8. RETIREMENT INCOME AND HEALTH CARE BENEFIT PLANS
The following table summarizes the components of net periodic benefit cost for the Companys retirement income plans:
Three Months Ended | |||||||
9/30/2013 | 9/30/2012 | ||||||
Service cost | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | |||
Interest cost | 6 | 6 | |||||
Expected return on plan assets | (6 | ) | (7 | ) | |||
Amortization of unrecognized items | 3 | 2 | |||||
Total | $ | 4 | $ | 2 |
The net periodic benefit cost for the Companys retirement health care plans was $0 for both the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.
10
NOTE 9. CONTINGENCIES AND GUARANTEES
Contingencies
The Company is involved in certain environmental matters, including response actions at various locations. The Company had a recorded liability of $14 and $13 as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, respectively, for its share of aggregate future remediation costs related to these matters. One matter in Dickinson County, Michigan, for which the Company is jointly and severally liable, accounted for a substantial majority of the recorded liability as of both September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013. The Company has agreed to be liable for 24.3% of the aggregate remediation and associated costs for this matter pursuant to a cost-sharing arrangement with a third party. With the assistance of environmental consultants, the Company maintains an undiscounted liability representing its current best estimate of its share of the capital expenditures, maintenance and other costs that may be incurred over an estimated 30-year remediation period. Currently, the Company cannot accurately predict the timing of future payments that may be made under this obligation. In addition, the Companys estimated loss exposure is sensitive to a variety of uncertain factors, including the efficacy of remediation efforts, changes in remediation requirements and the future availability of alternative clean-up technologies. Although it is reasonably possible that the Companys exposure may exceed the amount recorded, any amount of such additional exposures, or range of exposures, is not estimable at this time.
In October 2012, a Brazilian appellate court issued an adverse decision in a lawsuit pending in Brazil against the Company and one of its wholly owned subsidiaries, The Glad Products Company (Glad). The lawsuit was initially filed in a Brazilian lower court in 2002 by two Brazilian companies and one Uruguayan company (collectively, Petroplus) related to joint venture agreements for the distribution of STP auto-care products in Brazil with three companies that became subsidiaries of the Company as a result of the Companys merger with First Brands Corporation in January 1999 (collectively, Clorox Subsidiaries). The pending lawsuit seeks indemnification for damages and losses for alleged breaches of the joint venture agreements and abuse of economic power by the Company and Glad. Petroplus had previously unsuccessfully raised the same claims and sought damages from the Company and the Clorox Subsidiaries in an International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) arbitration proceeding in Miami filed in 2001. The ICC arbitration panel unanimously ruled against Petroplus in a final decision in November 2003 (Final ICC Arbitration Award). The Final ICC Arbitration Award was ratified by the Superior Court of Justice of Brazil in May 2007 (Foreign Judgment), and the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida subsequently confirmed the Final ICC Arbitration Award and recognized and adopted the Foreign Judgment as a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (U.S. Judgment). Despite this, in March 2008, a Brazilian lower court ruled against the Company and Glad in the pending lawsuit and awarded Petroplus R$23 ($13) plus interest. The value of that judgment, including interest and foreign exchange fluctuations as of September 30, 2013, was approximately $35.
Among other defenses, because the Final ICC Arbitration Award, the Foreign Judgment and the U.S. Judgment relate to the same claims as those in the pending lawsuit, the Company believes that Petroplus is precluded from re-litigating these claims. Based on the unfavorable appellate court decision, the Company believes that it is reasonably possible that a loss could be incurred in this matter in excess of amounts accrued, and that the estimated range of such loss in this matter is from $0 to $29. The Company continues to believe that its defenses are meritorious, and has appealed the decision to the highest courts of Brazil, which could take years to resolve. Expenses related to this litigation and any potential additional loss would be reflected in discontinued operations, consistent with the Companys classification of expenses related to its discontinued Brazil operations.
In a separate action filed in 2004 by Petroplus, a lower Brazilian court in January 2013 nullified the Final ICC Arbitration Award. The Company believes this judgment is inconsistent with the Foreign Judgment and the U.S. Judgment and that it is without merit. The Company has appealed this decision.
Glad and the Clorox Subsidiaries have also filed separate lawsuits against Petroplus alleging misuse of the STP trademark and related matters, which are currently pending before Brazilian courts, and have taken other legal actions against Petroplus, which are pending.
The Company is subject to various other lawsuits and claims relating to issues such as contract disputes, product liability, patents and trademarks, advertising, and employee and other matters. Based on managements analysis of these claims and litigation, it is the opinion of management that the ultimate disposition of these matters, to the extent not previously provided for, will not have a material adverse effect, individually or in the aggregate, on the Companys consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.
11
NOTE 9. CONTINGENCIES AND GUARANTEES (Continued)
Guarantees
In conjunction with divestitures and other transactions, the Company may provide typical indemnifications (e.g., indemnifications for representations and warranties and retention of previously existing environmental, tax and employee liabilities) that have terms that vary in duration and in the potential amount of the total obligation and, in many circumstances, are not explicitly defined. The Company has not made, nor does it believe that it is probable that it will make, any payments relating to its indemnifications, and believes that any reasonably possible payments would not have a material adverse effect, individually or in the aggregate, on the Companys consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.
As of September 30, 2013, the Company was a party to a letter of credit of $12, related to one of its insurance carriers, of which $0 had been drawn upon.
The Company had not recorded any liabilities on the aforementioned guarantees as of September 30, 2013.
NOTE 10. SEGMENT RESULTS
The Company operates through strategic business units that are aggregated into four reportable segments: Cleaning, Household, Lifestyle and International.
Certain non-allocated administrative costs, interest income, interest expense and various other non-operating income and expenses are reflected in Corporate. Corporate assets include cash and cash equivalents, property and equipment, other investments and deferred taxes.
12
NOTE 10. SEGMENT RESULTS (Continued)
The table below presents reportable segment information and a reconciliation of the segment information to the Companys consolidated net sales and earnings from continuing operations before income taxes, with amounts that are not allocated to the reportable segments reflected in Corporate.
Net sales | Earnings
(losses) from continuing operations before income taxes | |||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||
9/30/2013 | 9/30/2012 | 9/30/2013 | 9/30/2012 | |||||||||||
Cleaning | $ | 479 | $ | 472 | $ | 131 | $ | 120 | ||||||
Household | 372 | 355 | 52 | 50 | ||||||||||
Lifestyle | 218 | 208 | 53 | 56 | ||||||||||
International | 295 | 303 | 28 | 28 | ||||||||||
Corporate | - | - | (56 | ) | (60 | ) | ||||||||
Total | $ | 1,364 | $ | 1,338 | $ | 208 | $ | 194 |
All intersegment sales are eliminated and are not included in the Companys reportable segments net sales.
Net sales to the Companys largest customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and its affiliates, as a percentage of consolidated net sales, were 26% and 27% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
NOTE 11. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets are required to be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
Level 1: Quoted market prices in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are
corroborated by market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting the
reporting entitys own assumptions.
As of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, the Companys financial assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the period included derivative financial instruments, which were all Level 2.
Financial Risk Management and Derivative Instruments
The Company is exposed to certain commodity, interest rate and foreign currency risks related to its ongoing business operations and uses derivative instruments to mitigate its exposure to these risks.
Commodity Price Risk Management
The Company may use commodity exchange traded futures and over-the-counter swap contracts to fix the price of a portion of its forecasted raw material requirements. Contract maturities, which are generally no longer than 18 months, are matched to the length of the raw material purchase contracts. Commodity purchase contracts are measured at fair value using market quotations obtained from commodity derivative dealers.
As of September 30, 2013, the notional amount of commodity derivatives was $64, of which $36 related to jet fuel and $28 related to soybean oil. As of June 30, 2013, the notional amount of commodity derivatives was $51, of which $32 related to jet fuel and $19 related to soybean oil.
13
NOTE 11. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)
Interest Rate Risk Management
The Company may enter into over-the-counter interest rate forward contracts to fix a portion of the benchmark interest rate prior to the anticipated issuance of fixed rate debt. These interest rate forward contracts generally have durations of less than 12 months. The interest rate contracts are measured at fair value using information quoted by U.S. government bond dealers.
As of both September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, there were no outstanding interest rate forward contracts.
Foreign Currency Risk Management
The Company may also enter into certain over-the-counter foreign currency-related derivative contracts to manage a portion of the Companys foreign exchange risk associated with the purchase of inventory and certain intercompany transactions. These foreign currency contracts generally have durations of no longer than 20 months. The foreign exchange contracts are measured at fair value using information quoted by foreign exchange dealers.
The notional amount of outstanding foreign currency forward contracts used by the Companys subsidiaries in Canada, Australia and New Zealand to hedge forecasted purchases of inventory were $12, $27 and $3, respectively, as of September 30, 2013, and $18, $22 and $4, respectively, as of June 30, 2013. The notional amount of outstanding foreign currency forward contracts used by the Company to economically hedge foreign exchange risk associated with certain intercompany transactions was $0 as of both September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013.
Counterparty Risk Management
The Company utilizes a variety of financial institutions as counterparties for over-the counter derivative instruments. The Company enters into agreements governing the use of over-the-counter derivative instruments and sets internal limits on the aggregate over-the-counter derivative instrument positions held with each counterparty. Certain terms of these agreements require the Company or the counterparty to post collateral when the fair value of the derivative instruments exceeds contractually defined counterparty liability position limits. The $4 and $3 of derivative instruments reflected in liabilities as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, respectively, contained such terms. As of both September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, the Company was not required to post any collateral.
Certain terms of the agreements governing the Companys over-the-counter derivative instruments require the credit ratings, as assigned by Standard & Poors and Moodys to the Company and its counterparties, to remain at a level equal to or better than the minimum of an investment grade credit rating. If the Companys credit ratings were to fall below investment grade, the counterparties to the derivative instruments could request full collateralization on derivative instruments in net liability positions. As of both September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, the Company and each of its counterparties had been assigned investment grade ratings with both Standard & Poors and Moodys.
14
NOTE 11. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
The accounting for changes in the fair value (i.e., gains or losses) of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as an accounting hedge, and, if so, on the type of hedging relationship. For those derivative instruments designated and qualifying as hedging instruments, the Company must designate the hedging instrument as a fair value hedge or a cash flow hedge. The Company designates its commodity forward and future contracts for forecasted purchases of raw materials, interest rate forward contracts for forecasted interest payments, and foreign currency forward contracts for forecasted purchases of inventory as cash flow hedges. The Company does not designate its foreign currency forward contracts for intercompany transactions as accounting hedges. During the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company had no hedging instruments designated as fair value hedges.
The Companys derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments were recorded at fair value in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as follows:
Balance sheet classification | 9/30/2013 | 6/30/2013 | ||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts | Other current assets | $ | 2 | $ | 4 | |||
Liabilities | ||||||||
Commodity purchase contracts | Accrued liabilities | $ | 3 | $ | 3 | |||
Commodity purchase contracts | Other liabilities | 1 | - | |||||
$ | 4 | $ | 3 |
15
NOTE 11. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)
For derivative instruments designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of gains or losses is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (OCI) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The estimated amount of the existing net loss in OCI as of September 30, 2013, expected to be reclassified into earnings within the next 12 months is $5. Gains and losses on derivative instruments representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in current earnings. During the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, hedge ineffectiveness was not significant. The Company de-designates cash flow hedge relationships whenever it determines that the hedge relationships are no longer highly effective or that the forecasted transaction is no longer probable. The portion of gains or losses on the derivative instrument previously accumulated in OCI for de-designated hedges remains in accumulated OCI until the forecasted transaction is recognized in earnings, or is recognized in earnings immediately if the forecasted transaction is no longer probable. Changes in the value of derivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges are recorded in other expense, net.
The effects of derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments on OCI and the condensed consolidated statements of earnings and comprehensive income were as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
(Loss) gain recognized in OCI | (Loss) gain
reclassified from OCI and recognized in earnings | |||||||||||||||
9/30/2013 | 9/30/2012 | 9/30/2013 | 9/30/2012 | |||||||||||||
Commodity purchase contracts | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 2 | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||
Interest rate contracts | - | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts | - | (2 | ) | 1 | - | |||||||||||
Total | $ | (2 | ) | $ | (1 | ) | $ | - | $ | (1 | ) |
The gains and losses reclassified from OCI and recognized in earnings during the three months ended September 30, 2013 for commodity purchase contracts and foreign exchange contracts were included in cost of products sold. The losses reclassified from OCI and recognized in earnings during the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 for interest rate contracts were included in interest expense.
The gain from derivatives not designated as accounting hedges was $0 and $1 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and was reflected in other expense, net.
Other
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, notes and loans payable and accounts payable approximated their fair values as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, due to their short maturity and nature. The estimated fair value of long-term debt, including current maturities, was $2,252 and $2,263 as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, respectively. The fair value of long-term debt was determined using secondary market prices quoted by corporate bond dealers, and was classified as Level 2. The Company accounts for its long-term debt at face value, net of any unamortized discounts or premiums.
16
Item 2. Managements Discussion and
Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The Clorox
Company
(Dollars in millions, except per
share amounts)
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) is designed to provide a reader of The Clorox Companys (the Company or Clorox) financial statements with a narrative from the perspective of management on the Companys financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and certain other factors that may affect future results. The following discussion of the Companys financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with MD&A and the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on August 23, 2013, and the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this Report). Unless otherwise noted, MD&A compares the three months ended September 30, 2013 (the current period) to the three months ended September 30, 2012 (the prior period) using percentages and basis point changes calculated on a rounded basis.
The following sections are included herein:
OVERVIEW
Clorox is a leading multinational manufacturer and marketer of consumer and professional products with approximately 8,400 employees worldwide. Clorox sells its products primarily through mass merchandisers, retail outlets, e-commerce channels, distributors and medical supply providers. Clorox markets some of the most trusted and recognized brand names, including its namesake bleach and cleaning products, Clorox Healthcare, HealthLink®, Aplicare® and Dispatch® products, Green Works® naturally derived products, Pine-Sol® cleaners, Poett® home care products, Fresh Step® cat litter, Glad® bags, wraps and containers, Kingsford® charcoal, Hidden Valley® and KC Masterpiece® dressings and sauces, Brita® water-filtration products, and Burts Bees® and güd® natural personal care products. The Company manufactures products in more than two dozen countries and markets them in more than 100 countries.
The Company primarily markets its leading brands in midsized categories considered to have attractive economic profit potential. Most of the Companys products compete with other nationally advertised brands within each category and with private label brands.
17
The Company operates through strategic business units that are aggregated into four reportable segments: Cleaning, Household, Lifestyle and International.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended | % of Net Sales | ||||||||||||||
9/30/2013 | 9/30/2012 | % Change | 9/30/2013 | 9/30/2012 | |||||||||||
Diluted net earnings per share from continuing operations | $ | 1.04 | $ | 1.01 | 3 | % | |||||||||
Net sales | 1,364 | 1,338 | 2 | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||
Gross profit | 585 | 574 | 2 | 42.9 | 42.9 | ||||||||||
Selling and administrative expenses | 198 | 195 | 2 | 14.5 | 14.6 | ||||||||||
Advertising costs | 120 | 122 | (2 | ) | 8.8 | 9.1 | |||||||||
Research and development costs | 31 | 30 | 3 | 2.3 | 2.2 |
Diluted net earnings per share from continuing operations increased $0.03, or 3%, in the current period, primarily due to strong cost savings, higher volume and the benefit of price increases. These increases were partially offset by higher manufacturing and logistics costs, higher commodity costs, unfavorable foreign currency exchange rates and a higher effective tax rate.
Net sales and volume increased 2% and 1%, respectively, in the current period. The increase in volume was primarily driven by higher shipments of cleaning and healthcare products in the professional products business; higher shipments of Clorox® liquid bleach behind strong category growth following last years conversion to the new concentrated formula; higher shipments of Kingsford® and Match Light® charcoal products behind strong merchandising activities; higher shipments of Burts Bees® natural personal care products, primarily driven by product innovation in lip products and growth in face products; and higher shipments of Hidden Valley® products, including dry mixes and dips, as well as new sandwich spreads and pasta salad kits. These increases were partially offset by lower shipments of Clorox® disinfecting wipes, primarily due to increased competitive activity. Net sales growth outpaced volume growth primarily due to the benefit of price increases (180 basis points) and favorable mix and assortment (70 basis points), partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency exchange rates (160 basis points).
18
Gross margin percentage, defined as gross profit as a percentage of net sales, remained flat. In the current period, 180 basis points from strong cost savings and 80 basis points from the benefit of price increases were offset by 140 basis points from higher manufacturing and logistics costs, in large part reflecting inflationary pressures in Argentina and Venezuela, and 110 basis points from higher commodity costs. Price controls in Argentina and Venezuela also had a negative impact on gross margin.
Selling and administrative expenses increased by 2% in the current period, primarily due to higher wages and employee benefits, current period information technology (IT) service transition costs, and investments in systems and processes to support the long-term growth of the Burts Bees business. These increases were partially offset by current period cost savings and lower administrative costs compared to prior period spending for IT systems implementation in Latin America.
Advertising costs, as a percentage of net sales, decreased slightly in the current period, primarily due to reduced investments in challenging markets, particularly in Venezuela and Argentina where the Company continues to face high inflation and price controls.
Research and development costs slightly increased as a percentage of net sales in the current period, reflecting the Companys continued support of its new products and established brands with an emphasis on innovation.
Interest expense decreased $7 in the current period, primarily due to a lower weighted-average interest rate on long-term debt resulting from the issuance of senior notes in September 2012 and the maturities of senior notes in October 2012 and March 2013.
Other expense, net, was $2 in the current period and $0 in the prior period. Other expense, net, in the current period included $2 of foreign currency exchange losses and $2 of amortization of trademarks and other intangible assets, partially offset by $3 of income from equity investees. Other expense, net, in the prior period included $2 of amortization of trademarks and other intangible assets, offset by $2 of income from equity investees.
The effective tax rate on earnings from continuing operations was 34.1% and 31.6% for the current and prior periods, respectively. The lower tax rate for the prior period was primarily due to lower taxes on foreign earnings related to a favorable tax settlement.
SEGMENT RESULTS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
The following sections present the results from operations of the Companys reportable segments and certain unallocated costs reflected in Corporate:
Cleaning
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
9/30/2013 | 9/30/2012 | % Change | ||||||
Net sales | $ | 479 | $ | 472 | 1 | % | ||
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes | 131 | 120 | 9 |
Net sales and earnings from continuing operations before income taxes increased while volume remained flat in the current period. Flat volume in the Cleaning segment reflected higher shipments of cleaning and healthcare products in the professional products business, and higher shipments of Clorox® liquid bleach behind strong category growth following last years conversion to the new concentrated formula. These increases were offset primarily by lower shipments of Clorox® disinfecting wipes, driven by increased competitive activity. Net sales growth outpaced volume primarily due to the benefit of price increases (80 basis points) and favorable mix and assortment (50 basis points). The increase in earnings from continuing operations before income taxes was driven by $11 of cost savings, primarily related to the Companys conversion to concentrated liquid bleach and various manufacturing efficiencies, and higher net sales; partially offset by individually small items.
19
Household
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
9/30/2013 | 9/30/2012 | % Change | ||||||
Net sales | $ | 372 | $ | 355 | 5 | % | ||
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes | 52 | 50 | 4 |
Net sales, volume and earnings from continuing operations before income taxes increased in the current period. Household segment volume growth was 2%, primarily driven by higher shipments of Kingsford® and Match Light® charcoal products behind strong merchandising activities, and higher shipments of Fresh Step® cat litter behind product innovation. These increases were partially offset by lower shipments of Glad® trash bags, primarily driven by base trash declines due to distribution losses and lower merchandising. Net sales growth outpaced volume growth primarily due to the benefit of price increases (150 basis points) and lower trade promotion spending (110 basis points). The increase in earnings from continuing operations before income taxes was primarily due to higher net sales and $6 of cost savings related to various manufacturing efficiencies. These increases were partially offset by $9 of higher commodity costs, primarily resin; $5 of higher manufacturing and logistics and other supply chain costs; and other smaller items.
Lifestyle
Three Months Ended | |||||||||
9/30/2013 | 9/30/2012 | % Change | |||||||
Net sales | $ | 218 | $ | 208 | 5 | % | |||
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes | 53 | 56 | (5 | ) |
Net sales and volume increased while earnings from continuing operations before income taxes decreased in the current period. Lifestyle segment volume growth was 4%, driven by higher shipments of Burts Bees® natural personal care products, primarily due to product innovation in lip products and growth in face products; and higher shipments of Hidden Valley® products, including dry mixes and dips, as well as new sandwich spreads and pasta salad kits. Net sales growth outpaced volume growth primarily due to the benefit of price increases (90 basis points) and favorable mix and assortment (80 basis points), partially offset by higher trade promotion spending (80 basis points). The decrease in earnings from continuing operations before income taxes was driven by $4 of investments in systems and processes to support the long-term growth of the Burts Bees business and other smaller items, partially offset by higher volume.
20
International
Three Months Ended | |||||||||
9/30/2013 | 9/30/2012 | % Change | |||||||
Net sales | $ | 295 | $ | 303 | (3 | ) | % | ||
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes | 28 | 28 | - |
Net sales decreased while volume and earnings from continuing operations before income taxes remained flat in the current period. Flat volume in the International segment reflected lower shipments in Venezuela, Argentina and Canada, offset primarily by higher shipments in other countries in Latin America. The variance between volume and net sales was primarily driven by unfavorable foreign currency exchange rates (720 basis points) and higher trade promotion spending (130 basis points), partially offset by the benefit of price increases (450 basis points) and favorable mix and assortment (150 basis points). Flat earnings from continuing operations before income taxes reflected $15 of higher manufacturing and logistics and other supply chain costs, reflecting inflationary pressures, and $11 from unfavorable foreign currency exchange rates; offset by $14 from the benefit of price increases, $6 of favorable mix and assortment, $5 of lower spending compared to prior period costs associated with IT systems implementation in Latin America, $5 of cost savings, and other smaller items.
Corporate
Certain non-allocated administrative costs, interest income, interest expense and various other non-operating income and expenses are reflected in Corporate. Corporate assets include cash and cash equivalents, property and equipment, other investments and deferred taxes.
Three Months Ended | |||||||||
9/30/2013 | 9/30/2012 | % Change | |||||||
Losses from continuing operations before income taxes | $ | 56 | $ | 60 | (7 | ) | % |
The decrease in losses from continuing operations before income taxes attributable to Corporate in the current period was primarily due to a lower weighted-average interest rate on long-term debt resulting from the issuance of senior notes in September 2012 and the maturities of senior notes in October 2012 and March 2013, partially offset by current period IT service transition costs.
FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Operating Activities
The Companys financial condition and liquidity remain strong as of September 30, 2013. Net cash provided by continuing operations was $179 in the current period, compared with $208 in the prior period. The decrease was driven by higher tax payments and an increase in inventory in the current period.
21
Investing Activities
Capital expenditures were $27 in the current period, compared with $54 in the prior period. Capital spending as a percentage of net sales was 2.0% in the current period, compared with 4.0% in the prior period. The decrease in capital expenditures was primarily due to prior period investments in the Companys Pleasanton, Calif. facility and IT systems implementation in Latin America.
Financing Activities
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities was $(128) in the current period, compared with $242 in the prior period. The change was primarily due to share repurchases activities, higher dividend payments, a decrease in proceeds from employee stock option exercises in the current period, and the receipt of proceeds from the issuance of senior notes in excess of notes payable balances paid down in the prior year period.
In September 2012, the Company issued $600 of senior notes with an annual fixed interest rate of 3.05% under its existing shelf registration statement. The notes are payable semi-annually in March and September and have a maturity date of September 15, 2022. Net proceeds were used to repay commercial paper in September 2012 and all of the Companys $350 senior notes with an annual fixed interest rate of 5.45% upon maturity in October 2012. The notes rank equally with all of the Companys existing and future senior indebtedness.
Share repurchases and dividends
The Company has two share repurchase programs: an open-market purchase program with an authorized aggregate purchase amount of up to $750, all of which was available for share repurchases as of September 30, 2013, and a program to offset the impact of share dilution related to share-based awards (the Evergreen Program), which has no authorization limit as to amount or timing of repurchases.
During the current and prior periods, the Company repurchased approximately 1.6 million shares and zero shares, respectively, under its Evergreen Program, for an aggregate amount of $130 and $0, respectively. The Company did not repurchase any shares under the open-market purchase program during the current or prior periods.
During the current and prior periods, the Company paid dividends per share of $0.71 and $0.64, respectively, equivalent to $93 and $83, respectively.
Credit Arrangements
As of September 30, 2013, the Company had a $1.1 billion revolving credit agreement with an expiration date of May 2017. There were no borrowings under the agreement, and the Company believes that borrowings under the revolving credit agreement are and will continue to be available for general corporate purposes. The agreement includes certain restrictive covenants and limitations. The primary restrictive covenant is a maximum ratio of total debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) for the trailing four quarters (EBITDA ratio), as defined in the Companys revolving credit agreement, of 3.50.
22
The following table sets forth the calculation of the EBITDA ratio as of September 30, using EBITDA for the trailing four quarters, as contractually defined:
2013 | 2012 | ||||
Earnings from continuing operations | $ | 578 | $ | 546 | |
Add back: | |||||
Interest expense | 115 | 129 | |||
Income tax expense | 289 | 252 | |||
Depreciation and amortization | 182 | 176 | |||
Deduct: | |||||
Interest income | 4 | 2 | |||
EBITDA | $ | 1,160 | $ | 1,101 | |
Total debt | $ | 2,456 | $ | 3,021 | |
EBITDA ratio | 2.12 | 2.74 |
The Company is in compliance with all restrictive covenants and limitations in the credit agreement as of September 30, 2013, and anticipates being in compliance with all restrictive covenants for the foreseeable future. The Company continues to monitor the financial markets and assess its ability to fully draw on its revolving credit agreement, and currently expects that any drawing on the agreement will be fully funded.
The Company had $45 of foreign and other credit lines as of September 30, 2013, of which $6 was outstanding and $39 was available for borrowing.
CONTINGENCIES
The Company is involved in certain environmental matters, including response actions at various locations. The Company had a recorded liability of $14 and $13 as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, respectively, for its share of aggregate future remediation costs related to these matters. One matter in Dickinson County, Michigan, for which the Company is jointly and severally liable, accounted for a substantial majority of the recorded liability as of both September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013. The Company has agreed to be liable for 24.3% of the aggregate remediation and associated costs for this matter pursuant to a cost-sharing arrangement with a third party. With the assistance of environmental consultants, the Company maintains an undiscounted liability representing its current best estimate of its share of the capital expenditures, maintenance and other costs that may be incurred over an estimated 30-year remediation period. Currently, the Company cannot accurately predict the timing of future payments that may be made under this obligation. In addition, the Companys estimated loss exposure is sensitive to a variety of uncertain factors, including the efficacy of remediation efforts, changes in remediation requirements and the future availability of alternative clean-up technologies. Although it is reasonably possible that the Companys exposure may exceed the amount recorded, any amount of such additional exposures, or range of exposures, is not estimable at this time.
23
In October 2012, a Brazilian appellate court issued an adverse decision in a lawsuit pending in Brazil against the Company and one of its wholly owned subsidiaries, The Glad Products Company (Glad). The lawsuit was initially filed in a Brazilian lower court in 2002 by two Brazilian companies and one Uruguayan company (collectively, Petroplus) related to joint venture agreements for the distribution of STP auto-care products in Brazil with three companies that became subsidiaries of the Company as a result of the Companys merger with First Brands Corporation in January 1999 (collectively, Clorox Subsidiaries). The pending lawsuit seeks indemnification for damages and losses for alleged breaches of the joint venture agreements and abuse of economic power by the Company and Glad. Petroplus had previously unsuccessfully raised the same claims and sought damages from the Company and the Clorox Subsidiaries in an International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) arbitration proceeding in Miami filed in 2001. The ICC arbitration panel unanimously ruled against Petroplus in a final decision in November 2003 (Final ICC Arbitration Award). The Final ICC Arbitration Award was ratified by the Superior Court of Justice of Brazil in May 2007 (Foreign Judgment), and the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida subsequently confirmed the Final ICC Arbitration Award and recognized and adopted the Foreign Judgment as a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (U.S. Judgment). Despite this, in March 2008, a Brazilian lower court ruled against the Company and Glad in the pending lawsuit and awarded Petroplus R$23 ($13) plus interest. The value of that judgment, including interest and foreign exchange fluctuations as of September 30, 2013, was approximately $35.
Among other defenses, because the Final ICC Arbitration Award, the Foreign Judgment and the U.S. Judgment relate to the same claims as those in the pending lawsuit, the Company believes that Petroplus is precluded from re-litigating these claims. Based on the unfavorable appellate court decision, the Company believes that it is reasonably possible that a loss could be incurred in this matter in excess of amounts accrued, and that the estimated range of such loss in this matter is from $0 to $29. The Company continues to believe that its defenses are meritorious, and has appealed the decision to the highest courts of Brazil, which could take years to resolve. Expenses related to this litigation and any potential additional loss would be reflected in discontinued operations, consistent with the Companys classification of expenses related to its discontinued Brazil operations.
In a separate action filed in 2004 by Petroplus, a lower Brazilian court in January 2013 nullified the Final ICC Arbitration Award. The Company believes this judgment is inconsistent with the Foreign Judgment and the U.S. Judgment and that it is without merit. The Company has appealed this decision.
Glad and the Clorox Subsidiaries have also filed separate lawsuits against Petroplus alleging misuse of the STP trademark and related matters, which are currently pending before Brazilian courts, and have taken other legal actions against Petroplus, which are pending.
The Company is subject to various other lawsuits and claims relating to issues such as contract disputes, product liability, patents and trademarks, advertising, and employee and other matters. Based on managements analysis of these claims and litigation, it is the opinion of management that the ultimate disposition of these matters, to the extent not previously provided for, will not have a material adverse effect, individually or in the aggregate, on the Companys consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
In conjunction with divestitures and other transactions, the Company may provide typical indemnifications (e.g., indemnifications for representations and warranties and retention of previously existing environmental, tax and employee liabilities) that have terms that vary in duration and in the potential amount of the total obligation and, in many circumstances, are not explicitly defined. The Company has not made, nor does it believe that it is probable that it will make, any payments relating to its indemnifications, and believes that any reasonably possible payments would not have a material adverse effect, individually or in the aggregate, on the Companys consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.
As of September 30, 2013, the Company was a party to a letter of credit of $12, related to one of its insurance carriers, of which $0 had been drawn upon.
The Company had not recorded any liabilities on the aforementioned guarantees as of September 30, 2013.
24
Cautionary Statement
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including the exhibits hereto and the information incorporated by reference herein, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and such forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Except for historical information, matters discussed above, including statements about future volume, sales, costs, cost savings, earnings, cash flows, plans, objectives, expectations, growth, or profitability, are forward-looking statements based on managements estimates, assumptions and projections. Words such as will, could, may, expects, anticipates, targets, goals, projects, intends, plans, believes, seeks, estimates, and variations on such words, and similar expressions, are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are only predictions, subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results could differ materially from those discussed above. Important factors that could affect performance and cause results to differ materially from managements expectations are described in the sections entitled Risk Factors and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, as updated from time to time in the Companys SEC filings. These factors include, but are not limited to:
The Companys forward-looking statements in this Report are based on managements current views and assumptions regarding future events and speak only as of their dates. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by the federal securities laws.
In this Report, unless the context requires otherwise, the terms the Company and Clorox refer to The Clorox Company and its subsidiaries.
25
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There have not been any material changes to the Companys market risk since June 30, 2013. For additional information, refer to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Companys management, with the participation of the Companys chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Report. Based on that evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report, were effective such that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports filed under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.
No change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting occurred during the first fiscal quarter of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
26
For information regarding Risk Factors, please refer to Item 1.A. in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table sets forth the purchases of the Companys securities by the Company and any affiliated purchasers within the meaning of Rule 10b-18(a)(3) (17 CFR 240.10b-18(a)(3)) during the first quarter of fiscal year 2014.
[a] | [b] | [c] | [d] | |||||||
Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased(1) |
Average Price Paid per Share |
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs(2) | ||||||
July 1 to 31, 2013 | - | $ | - | - | $ | 750,000,000 | ||||
August 1 to 31, 2013 | 1,195,000 | $ | 83.89 | 1,195,000 | $ | 750,000,000 | ||||
September 1 to 30, 2013 | 365,615 | $ | 82.70 | 365,159 | $ | 750,000,000 | ||||
Total | 1,560,615 | $ | 83.61 | 1,560,159 |
(1) | Shares purchased in August 2013 were acquired pursuant to the Companys share repurchase program to offset the potential impact of share dilution related to share-based awards. Of the shares purchased in September 2013, 365,159 shares were acquired pursuant to the Companys share repurchase program to offset the potential impact of share dilution related to share- based awards. Of the remaining 456 shares purchased, 296 shares relate to the surrender to the Company of shares of common stock to pay the exercise price and satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the exercise of employee stock options and 160 shares relate to the surrender to the Company of shares of common stock to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted shares. | |
(2) | As of September 30, 2013, all of the $750 million authorized under the share repurchase program approved by the board of directors on May 13, 2013 remained available for repurchases. On September 1, 1999, the Company announced a share repurchase program to reduce or eliminate dilution upon the issuance of shares pursuant to the Companys stock compensation plans. The program initiated in 1999 has no specified cap and, therefore, is not included in column [d] above. On November 15, 2005, the board of directors approved the extension of the 1999 program to reduce or eliminate dilution in connection with issuances of common stock pursuant to the Companys 2005 Stock Incentive Plan. Neither of these programs has a specified termination date. |
27
31.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of The Clorox Company pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of The Clorox Company pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of The Clorox Company pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
101 | The following materials from The Clorox Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2013 are formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Income, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
28
S I G N A T U R E
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
THE CLOROX COMPANY | |||
(Registrant) | |||
DATE: November 1, 2013 | BY | /s/ Thomas D. Johnson | |
Thomas D. Johnson | |||
Vice President Global Business Services and | |||
Principal Accounting Officer |
29
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No.
31.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of The Clorox Company pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of The Clorox Company pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of The Clorox Company pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
101 | The following materials from The Clorox Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2013 are formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Income, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
30