Edgar Filing: VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP

VLY-3.31.2015-10Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)



x	Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2015



¨	Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 1-11277

VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



New Jersey		22-2477875
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

1455 Valley Road Wayne, NJ		07470
(Address of principal executive office)		(Zip code)

973-305-8800

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.) Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):



Large accelerated filer	x	Accelerated filer	¨

Non-accelerated filer	¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. Common Stock (no par value), of which 232,525,119 shares were outstanding as of May 6, 2015.

TABLE OF CONTENTS



		Page Number
PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)
	Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014	2
	Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2015 and 2014	3
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2015 and 2014	4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2015 and 2014	5
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	7

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	44

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	79

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	79

PART II	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	80

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	80

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	81

Item 6.	Exhibits	81

SIGNATURES		82

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

(in thousands, except for share data)



	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
Assets	(Unaudited)
Cash and due from banks	$	394,002		$	462,569
Interest bearing deposits with banks	370,712			367,838
Investment securities:
Held to maturity (fair value of $1,868,625 at March 31, 2015 and $1,815,976 at December 31, 2014)	1,825,819			1,778,316
Available for sale	843,518			886,970
Trading securities	—			14,233
Total investment securities	2,669,337			2,679,519
Loans held for sale, at fair value	3,648			24,295
Non-covered loans	13,550,735			13,262,022
Covered loans	183,726			211,891
Less: Allowance for loan losses	(102,631		)	(102,353		)
Net loans	13,631,830			13,371,560
Premises and equipment, net	281,236			282,997
Bank owned life insurance	377,404			375,640
Accrued interest receivable	56,590			57,333
Due from customers on acceptances outstanding	2,881			4,197
FDIC loss-share receivable	7,608			13,848
Goodwill	577,534			575,892
Other intangible assets, net	35,024			38,775
Other assets	572,204			539,392
Total Assets	$	18,980,010		$	18,793,855
Liabilities
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing	$	4,329,265		$	4,235,515
Interest bearing:
Savings, NOW and money market	7,115,243			7,056,133
Time	2,772,235			2,742,468
Total deposits	14,216,743			14,034,116
Short-term borrowings	133,866			146,781
Long-term borrowings	2,529,073			2,526,408
Junior subordinated debentures issued to capital trusts	41,292			41,252
Bank acceptances outstanding	2,881			4,197
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	189,002			178,084
Total Liabilities	17,112,857			16,930,838
Shareholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, (no par value, authorized 30,000,000 shares; none issued)	—			—
Common stock, (no par value, authorized 332,023,233 shares; issued 232,616,426 shares at March 31, 2015 and 232,127,098 shares at December 31, 2014)	81,170			81,072
Surplus	1,696,834			1,693,752
Retained earnings	135,571			130,845
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(44,662		)	(42,495		)
Treasury stock, at cost (188,318 common shares at March 31, 2015 and 16,123 common shares at December 31, 2014)	(1,760		)	(157		)
Total Shareholders’ Equity	1,867,153			1,863,017
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	18,980,010		$	18,793,855

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited)

(in thousands, except for share data)



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015			2014
Interest Income
Interest and fees on loans	$	150,482		$	131,079
Interest and dividends on investment securities:
Taxable	14,932			16,456
Tax-exempt	3,612			3,686
Dividends	1,739			1,790
Interest on federal funds sold and other short-term investments	220			27
Total interest income	170,985			153,038
Interest Expense
Interest on deposits:
Savings, NOW and money market	5,995			4,281
Time	7,974			6,532
Interest on short-term borrowings	94			318
Interest on long-term borrowings and junior subordinated debentures	24,836			27,883
Total interest expense	38,899			39,014
Net Interest Income	132,086			114,024
Provision for credit losses	—			3,998
Net Interest Income After Provision for Credit Losses	132,086			110,026
Non-Interest Income
Trust and investment services	2,494			2,442
Insurance commissions	4,205			4,498
Service charges on deposit accounts	5,290			5,751
Gains (losses) on securities transactions, net	2,416			(8		)
Fees from loan servicing	1,603			1,670
Gains on sales of loans, net	598			913
Gains (losses) on sales of assets, net	281			(148		)
Bank owned life insurance	1,764			1,408
Change in FDIC loss-share receivable	(3,920		)	(76		)
Other	3,914			4,288
Total non-interest income	18,645			20,738
Non-Interest Expense
Salary and employee benefits expense	56,712			48,088
Net occupancy and equipment expense	22,200			20,724
FDIC insurance assessment	3,792			3,287
Amortization of other intangible assets	2,393			2,351
Professional and legal fees	3,341			3,678
Amortization of tax credit investments	4,496			3,716
Advertising	1,729			617
Other	13,455			13,638
Total non-interest expense	108,118			96,099
Income Before Income Taxes	42,613			34,665
Income tax expense	12,272			830
Net Income	$	30,341		$	33,835
Earnings Per Common Share:
Basic	$	0.13		$	0.17
Diluted	0.13			0.17
Cash Dividends Declared per Common Share	0.11			0.11
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding:
Basic	232,338,775			200,128,384
Diluted	232,341,921			200,128,384

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Unaudited)

(in thousands)



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015			2014
Net income	$	30,341		$	33,835
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities
Net gains arising during the period	3,936			7,216
Less reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses included in net income	(1,409		)	5
Total	2,527			7,221
Non-credit impairment losses on available for sale securities
Net change in non-credit impairment losses on securities	(421		)	142
Less reclassification adjustment for accretion of credit impairment losses included in net income	(84		)	(115		)
Total	(505		)	27
Unrealized gains and losses on derivatives (cash flow hedges)
Net losses on derivatives arising during the period	(5,259		)	(3,662		)
Less reclassification adjustment for net losses included in net income	951			965
Total	(4,308		)	(2,697		)
Defined benefit pension plan
Amortization of net loss	119			37
Total other comprehensive (loss) income	(2,167		)	4,588
Total comprehensive income	$	28,174		$	38,423

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

(in thousands)



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015			2014
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	30,341		$	33,835
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	5,078			4,972
Stock-based compensation	2,479			2,178
Provision for credit losses	—			3,998
Net amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on securities and borrowings	8,371			6,715
Amortization of other intangible assets	2,393			2,351
(Gains) losses on securities transactions, net	(2,416		)	8
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale	38,568			32,771
Gains on sales of loans, net	(598		)	(913		)
Originations of loans held for sale	(17,716		)	(26,984		)
(Gains) losses on sales of assets, net	(281		)	148
FDIC loss-share receivable (excluding reimbursements)	3,920			76
Net change in:
Trading securities	14,233			9
Cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance	(1,764		)	(1,408		)
Accrued interest receivable	743			(322		)
Other assets	(37,584		)	15,010
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	8,104			(37,242		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	53,871			35,202
Cash flows from investing activities:
Net loan originations	(122,279		)	(150,592		)
Loans purchased	(139,935		)	(19,084		)
Investment securities held to maturity:
Purchases	(145,973		)	(177,462		)
Sales	11,666			—
Maturities, calls and principal repayments	85,798			93,818
Investment securities available for sale:
Purchases	(8,034		)	(5,964		)
Sales	13,974			—
Maturities, calls and principal repayments	38,678			50,081
Proceeds from sales of real estate property and equipment	4,551			5,977
Purchases of real estate property and equipment	(3,216		)	(5,673		)
Reimbursements from the FDIC	1,954			1,424
Net cash used in investing activities	(262,816		)	(207,475		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net change in deposits	182,627			(51,277		)
Net change in short-term borrowings	(12,915		)	255,655
Cash dividends paid to common shareholders	(25,512		)	(21,957		)
Common stock (purchased) issued, net	(948		)	286
Net cash provided by financing activities	143,252			182,707
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	(65,693		)	10,434
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	830,407			369,168
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	764,714		$	379,602

VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued) (in thousands)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015		2014
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash payments for:
Interest on deposits and borrowings	$	41,978	$	42,133
Federal and state income taxes	29,550		11,368
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing activities:
Transfer of loans to other real estate owned	$	1,944	$	3,508
Transfer of loans to loans held for sale	—		27,329

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 1. Basis of Presentation

The unaudited consolidated financial statements of Valley National Bancorp, a New Jersey Corporation (Valley), include the accounts of its commercial bank subsidiary, Valley National Bank (the “Bank”), and all of Valley’s direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries. All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated. The accounting and reporting policies of Valley conform to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) and general practices within the financial services industry. In accordance with applicable accounting standards, Valley does not consolidate statutory trusts established for the sole purpose of issuing trust preferred securities and related trust common securities.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly Valley’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows at March 31, 2015 and for all periods presented have been made. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire fiscal year.

In preparing the unaudited consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, management has made estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated statements of financial condition and results of operations for the periods indicated. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to change are: the allowance for loan losses; the evaluation of goodwill and other intangible assets, and investment securities for impairment; fair value measurements of assets and liabilities; and income taxes. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically and the effects of revisions are reflected in the consolidated financial statements in the period they are deemed necessary. While management uses its best judgment, actual amounts or results could differ significantly from those estimates. The current economic environment has increased the degree of uncertainty inherent in these material estimates.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and industry practice have been condensed or omitted pursuant to rules and regulations of the SEC. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Valley’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Note 2. Business Combinations

On November 1, 2014, Valley acquired 1st United Bancorp, Inc. (1st United) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, 1st United Bank, a commercial bank with approximately $1.7 billion in assets, $1.2 billion in loans, and $1.4 billion in deposits, after purchase accounting adjustments. The 1st United acquisition brings to Valley a 20 branch network covering some of the most attractive urban banking markets in Florida, including locations throughout southeast Florida, the Treasure Coast, central Florida and central Gulf Coast regions. The common shareholders of 1st United received 0.89 of a share of Valley common stock for each 1st United share they owned prior to the merger. The total consideration for the acquisition was approximately $300 million, consisting of 30.7 million shares of Valley common stock and $8.9 million of cash consideration paid to 1st United stock option holders.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, Valley revised the estimated fair values of the acquired assets as of the acquisition date as the result of additional information obtained. The adjustments mostly related to the fair value of certain purchased credit-impaired (PCI) loans, core deposit intangibles and deferred tax assets which, on a combined basis, resulted in a $1.6 million increase in goodwill (see Note 10 for amount of goodwill as allocated to Valley's business segments). The fair value estimates for acquired assets and assumed liabilities are subject to change for up to one year after the closing date of the 1st United acquisition, as additional information becomes available.

Note 3. Earnings Per Common Share

The following table shows the calculation of both basic and diluted earnings per common share for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015		2014
	(in thousands, except for share data)
Net income	$	30,341	$	33,835
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding	232,338,775		200,128,384
Plus: Common stock equivalents	3,146		—
Diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding	232,341,921		200,128,384
Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.13	$	0.17
Diluted	0.13		0.17

Common stock equivalents represent the dilutive effect of additional common shares issuable upon the assumed vesting or exercise, if applicable, of performance-based restricted stock units, common stock options and warrants to purchase Valley’s common shares. Common stock options and warrants with exercise prices that exceed the average market price of Valley’s common stock during the periods presented have an anti-dilutive effect on the diluted earnings per common share calculation and therefore are excluded from diluted earnings per share calculation. Anti-dilutive common stock options and warrants totaled approximately 6.2 million shares and 6.6 million shares for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Restricted stock units not included in common stock equivalents at March 31, 2015 and 2014 were immaterial.

Note 4. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The following table presents the after-tax changes in the balances of each component of accumulated other comprehensive loss for the three months ended March 31, 2015.



	Components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss												Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
	Unrealized Gains and (Losses) on Available for Sale (AFS) Securities			Non-credit Impairment Losses on AFS Securities			Unrealized Gains and (Losses) on Derivatives			Defined Benefit Pension Plan			Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
	(in thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2014	$	(1,890	)	$	145		$	(14,532	)	$	(26,218	)	$	(42,495	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications	3,936			(421		)	(5,259		)	—			(1,744		)
Amounts reclassified from other comprehensive income (loss)	(1,409		)	(84		)	951			119			(423		)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net	2,527			(505		)	(4,308		)	119			(2,167		)
Balance at March 31, 2015	$	637		$	(360	)	$	(18,840	)	$	(26,099	)	$	(44,662	)

The following table presents amounts reclassified from each component of accumulated other comprehensive loss on a gross and net of tax basis for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.



	Amounts Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
	Three Months Ended March 31,
Components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss	2015			2014			Income Statement Line Item
	(in thousands)
Unrealized gains (losses) on AFS securities before tax	$	2,416		$	(8	)	Gains (losses) on securities transactions, net
Tax effect	(1,007		)	3
Total net of tax	1,409			(5		)
Non-credit impairment losses on AFS securities before tax:
Accretion of credit loss impairment due to an increase in expected cash flows	144			198			Interest and dividends on investment securities (taxable)
Tax effect	(60		)	(83		)
Total net of tax	84			115
Unrealized losses on derivatives (cash flow hedges) before tax	(1,629		)	(1,648		)	Interest expense
Tax effect	678			683
Total net of tax	(951		)	(965		)
Defined benefit pension plan:
Amortization of net loss	(205		)	(62		)	*
Tax effect	86			25
Total net of tax	(119		)	(37		)
Total reclassifications, net of tax	$	423		$	(892	)



*	Amortization of net loss is included in the computation of net periodic pension cost.

Note 5. New Authoritative Accounting Guidance

Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2015-03, "Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs" requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in the ASU No. 2015-03. ASU No. 2015-03 will be effective for reporting periods (including interim periods) beginning after December 15, 2015. ASU No. 2015-03 became effective for Valley on January 1, 2015 and did not have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

ASU No. 2014-14, "Classification of Certain Government-Guaranteed Mortgage Loans Upon Foreclosure" requires that a mortgage loan be derecognized and that a separate other receivable be recognized upon foreclosure if the following conditions are met: (1) the loan has a government guarantee that is not separable from the loan before foreclosure, (2) at the time of foreclosure, the creditor has the intent to convey the real estate property to the guarantor and make a claim on the guarantee, and the creditor has the ability to recover under that claim and (3) at the time of foreclosure, any amount of the claim that is determined on the basis of the fair value of the real estate is fixed. Upon foreclosure, the separate other receivable should be measured based on the amount of the loan balance (principal and interest) expected to be recovered from the guarantor. ASU No. 2014-14 became effective for Valley on January 1, 2015 and did not have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

ASU No. 2014-12, "Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period" requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. ASU No. 2014-12 became effective for Valley on January 1, 2015 and did not have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

ASU No. 2014-11, "Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures" requires entities to account for repurchase-to-maturity transactions as secured borrowings rather than as sales with forward repurchase agreements and expands disclosure requirements related to certain transfers of financial assets that are accounted for as sales and certain transfers (specifically, repos, securities lending transactions, and repurchase-to-maturity transactions) accounted for as secured borrowings. The accounting-related changes became effective for the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2014. The disclosures for certain transactions accounted for as sales are required for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014. The disclosures for repos, securities lending transactions, and repos-to-maturity accounted for as secured borrowings are required for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods beginning after March 15, 2015. As of March 31, 2015, all of Valley's repurchase agreements were typical in nature (i.e., not repurchase-to-maturity transactions or repurchase agreements executed as a repurchase financing) and are accounted for as secured borrowings. As such, Valley's adoption of ASU No. 2014-11 did not have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

ASU No. 2014-04, “Receivables-Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors (Subtopic 310-40): Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure,” clarifies that an in-substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, and a creditor is considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan, upon either the creditor obtaining legal title to the residential real estate property upon completion of a foreclosure, or the borrower conveying all interest in the residential real estate property to the creditor to satisfy that loan through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or through a similar legal agreement. Additionally, this ASU requires interim and annual disclosure of both the amount of foreclosed residential real estate property held by the creditor and the recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property that are in the process of foreclosure according to local requirements of the applicable jurisdiction. ASU No. 2014-04 became effective for Valley on January 1, 2015 and did not to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements. See Note 8 for related disclosures.

ASU No. 2014-01, “Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Accounting for Investments in Qualified Affordable Housing Projects,” amends existing guidance to permit reporting entities to make an accounting policy election to account for their investments in qualified affordable housing projects using the proportional amortization method if certain conditions are met. Under the proportional amortization method, an entity amortizes the initial cost of the investment in proportion to the tax credits and other tax benefits received and recognizes the net investment performance in the income statement as a component of income tax expense or benefit. For those investments in qualified affordable housing projects not accounted for using the proportional amortization method, the investment should be accounted for as an equity method investment or a cost method investment in accordance with Subtopic 970-323. ASU No. 2014-01 became effective for Valley on January 1, 2015 and did not have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements. See Note 15 for the related disclosures.

Note 6. Fair Value Measurement of Assets and Liabilities

Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:



	Level 1	Unadjusted exchange quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, or identical liabilities traded as assets that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.



	Level 2	Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly (i.e., quoted prices on similar assets), for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.



	Level 3	Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market activity).

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring and Non-recurring Basis

The following tables present the assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy as reported on the consolidated statements of financial condition at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014. The assets presented under “nonrecurring fair value measurements” in the table below are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments under certain circumstances (e.g., when an impairment loss is recognized).



	March 31, 2015		Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:
	March 31, 2015		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(in thousands)
Recurring fair value measurements:
Assets
Investment securities:
Available for sale:
U.S. Treasury securities	$	50,473	$	50,473	$	—	$	—
U.S. government agency securities	27,339		—		27,339		—
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	44,207		—		44,207		—
Residential mortgage-backed securities	617,715		—		604,277		13,438
Trust preferred securities	8,538		—		6,508		2,030
Corporate and other debt securities	74,502		18,272		56,230		—
Equity securities	20,744		1,473		19,271		—
Total available for sale	843,518		70,218		757,832		15,468
Loans held for sale ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	3,648		—		3,648		—
Other assets ⁽³⁾	29,770		—		29,770		—
Total assets	$	876,936	$	70,218	$	791,250	$	15,468
Liabilities
Other liabilities ⁽³⁾	$	47,120	$	—	$	47,120	$	—
Total liabilities	$	47,120	$	—	$	47,120	$	—
Non-recurring fair value measurements:
Collateral dependent impaired loans ⁽⁴⁾	$	9,963	$	—	$	—	$	9,963
Loan servicing rights	5,657		—		—		5,657
Foreclosed assets ⁽⁵⁾	2,379		—		—		2,379
Total	$	17,999	$	—	$	—	$	17,999



			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:
	December 31, 2014		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(in thousands)
Recurring fair value measurements:
Assets
Investment securities:
Available for sale:
U.S. Treasury securities	$	49,443	$	49,443	$	—	$	—
U.S. government agency securities	33,825		—		33,825		—
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	44,051		—		44,051		—
Residential mortgage-backed securities	644,276		—		629,696		14,580
Trust preferred securities	20,537		—		15,808		4,729
Corporate and other debt securities	74,012		18,241		55,771		—
Equity securities	20,826		1,337		19,489		—
Total available for sale	886,970		69,021		798,640		19,309
Trading securities	14,233		—		14,233		—
Loans held for sale ⁽¹⁾	17,165		—		17,165		—
Other assets ⁽³⁾	20,987		—		20,987		—
Total assets	$	939,355	$	69,021	$	851,025	$	19,309
Liabilities
Other liabilities ⁽³⁾	$	33,330	$	—	$	33,330	$	—
Total liabilities	$	33,330	$	—	$	33,330	$	—
Non-recurring fair value measurements:
Non-performing loans held for sale	$	7,130	$	—	$	—	$	7,130
Collateral dependent impaired loans ⁽⁴⁾	13,985		—		—		13,985
Loan servicing rights	3,987		—		—		3,987
Foreclosed assets ⁽⁵⁾	18,098		—		—		18,098
Total	$	43,200	$	—	$	—	$	43,200


(1)	Loans held for sale carried at fair value (which consist of residential mortgages) had contractual unpaid principal balances totaling approximately $3.5 million and $16.9 million at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.


(2)	Gains and losses related to the change in the fair value of loans held for sale is included in net gains on sales of loans within the non-interest income category of our consolidated statements of income and totaled a net gain of $100 thousand and $121 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.


(3)	Derivative financial instruments are included in this category.


(4)	Excludes PCI loans.


(5)	Includes covered real estate owned totaling $3.2 million at December 31, 2014. There were no covered loan transfers into the real estate owned during the three months ended March 31, 2015.

The changes in Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 are summarized below:



	Available for Sale Securities
	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015			2014
	(in thousands)
Balance, beginning of the period	$	19,309		$	28,523
Total net (losses) gains included in other comprehensive income for the period	(792		)	48
Sales	(2,675		)	—
Settlements	(374		)	(1,660		)
Balance, end of the period	$	15,468		$	26,911

No changes in unrealized gains or losses on Level 3 securities held at March 31, 2015 and 2014 were included in earnings during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014. There were no transfers of assets into and out of Level 3, or between Level 1 and Level 2, during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

There have been no material changes in the valuation methodologies used at March 31, 2015 from December 31, 2014.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following valuation techniques were used for financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis. All the valuation techniques described below apply to the unpaid principal balance excluding any accrued interest or dividends at the measurement date. Interest income and expense are recorded within the consolidated statements of income depending on the nature of the instrument using the effective interest method based on acquired discount or premium.

Available for sale and trading securities. All U.S. Treasury securities, certain corporate and other debt securities, and certain common and preferred equity securities (including certain trust preferred securities) are reported at fair value utilizing Level 1 inputs. The majority of other investment securities are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs. The prices for these instruments are obtained through an independent pricing service or dealer market participants with whom Valley has historically transacted both purchases and sales of investment securities. Prices obtained from these sources include prices derived from market quotations and matrix pricing. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the bond’s terms and conditions, among other things. Management reviews the data and assumptions used in pricing the securities by its third party provider to ensure the highest level of significant inputs are derived from market observable data. For certain securities, the inputs used by either dealer market participants or an independent pricing service may be derived from unobservable market information (Level 3 inputs). In these instances, Valley evaluates the appropriateness and quality of the assumption and the resulting price. In addition, Valley reviews the volume and level of activity for all available for sale and trading securities and attempts to identify transactions which may not be orderly or reflective of a significant level of activity and volume. For securities meeting these criteria, the quoted prices received from either market participants or an independent pricing service may be adjusted, as necessary, to estimate fair value and this results in fair values based on Level 3 inputs. In determining fair value, Valley utilizes unobservable inputs which reflect Valley’s own assumptions about the inputs that market participants would use in pricing each security. In developing its assertion of market participant assumptions, Valley utilizes the best information that is both reasonable and available without undue cost and effort.

In calculating the fair value for the available for sale securities under Level 3, Valley prepared present value cash flow models for certain private label mortgage-backed securities. The cash flows for the residential mortgage-backed securities incorporated the expected cash flow of each security adjusted for default rates, loss severities and prepayments of the individual loans collateralizing the security.

The following table presents quantitative information about Level 3 inputs used to measure the fair value of these securities at March 31, 2015:



Security Type	Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Range	Weighted Average

Private label mortgage-backed securities	Discounted cash flow	Prepayment rate	0.0 - 18.2%	11.1	%
		Default rate	3.0 - 24.9	10.1
		Loss severity	40.0 - 62.9	57.1

Significant increases or decreases in any of the unobservable inputs in the table above in isolation would result in a significantly lower or higher fair value measurement of the securities. Generally, a change in the assumption used for the default rate is accompanied by a directionally similar change in the assumption used for the loss severity and a directionally opposite change in the assumption used for prepayment rates.

For the Level 3 available for sale private label mortgage-backed securities (consisting of 4 securities), cash flow assumptions incorporated independent third party market participant data based on vintage year for each security. The discount rate utilized in determining the present value of cash flows for the mortgage-backed securities was arrived at by combining the yield on orderly transactions for similar maturity government sponsored mortgage-backed securities with (i) the historical average risk premium of similar structured private label securities, (ii) a risk premium reflecting current market conditions, including liquidity risk and (iii) if applicable, a forecasted loss premium derived from the expected cash flows of each security. The estimated cash flows for each private label mortgage-backed security were then discounted at the aforementioned effective rate to determine the fair value. The quoted prices received from either market participants or independent pricing services are weighted with the internal price estimate to determine the fair value of each instrument.

For the Level 3 available for sale pooled trust preferred securities (consisting of 1 security at March 31, 2015 and 2 securities at December 31, 2014), the resulting estimated future cash flows were discounted at a yield determined by reference to similarly structured securities for which observable orderly transactions occurred. The discount rate for each security was applied using a pricing matrix based on credit, security type and maturity characteristics to determine the fair value. The fair value calculation is received from an independent valuation adviser. In validating the fair value calculation from an independent valuation adviser, Valley reviews the accuracy of the inputs and the appropriateness of the unobservable inputs utilized in the valuation to ensure the fair value calculation is reasonable from a market participant perspective.

Loans held for sale. The conforming residential mortgage loans originated for sale are reported at fair value using Level 2 inputs. The fair values were calculated utilizing quoted prices for similar assets in active markets. To determine these fair values, the mortgages held for sale are put into multiple tranches, or pools, based on the coupon rate and maturity of each mortgage. The market prices for each tranche are obtained from both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The market prices represent a delivery price, which reflects the underlying price each institution would pay Valley for an immediate sale of an aggregate pool of mortgages. The market prices received from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are then averaged and interpolated or extrapolated, where required, to calculate the fair value of each tranche. Depending upon the time elapsed since the origination of each loan held for sale, non-performance risk and changes therein were addressed in the estimate of fair value based upon the delinquency data provided to both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for market pricing and changes in market credit spreads. Non-performance risk did not materially impact the fair value of mortgage loans held for sale at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 based on the short duration these assets were held, and the high credit quality of these loans.

Derivatives. Derivatives are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs. The fair value of Valley’s derivatives are determined using third party prices that are based on discounted cash flow analysis using observed market inputs, such as the LIBOR and Overnight Index Swap rate curves. The fair value of mortgage banking derivatives, consisting of interest rate lock commitments to fund residential mortgage loans and forward commitments for the future delivery of such loans (including certain loans held for sale at March 31, 2015), is determined based on the current market prices for similar instruments provided by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. The fair values of most of the derivatives incorporate credit valuation adjustments, which consider the impact of any credit enhancements to the contracts, to account for potential nonperformance risk of Valley and its counterparties. The credit valuation adjustments were not significant to the overall valuation of Valley’s derivatives at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis

The following valuation techniques were used for certain non-financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, including non-performing loans held for sale carried at estimated fair value (less selling costs) when less than the unamortized cost, impaired loans reported at the fair value of the underlying collateral, loan servicing rights, other real estate owned and other repossessed assets, which are reported at fair value upon initial recognition or subsequent impairment as described below.

Non-performing loans held for sale. At December 31, 2014, non-performing loans held for sale consisted of one commercial real estate loan that was transferred to the loans held for sale account during the first quarter of 2014. At December 31, 2014, the loan was re-measured and reported at fair value of $7.1 million based upon a non-binding sale agreement. This sale transaction was completed during the first quarter of 2015.

Impaired loans. Certain impaired loans are reported at the fair value of the underlying collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral and are commonly referred to as “collateral dependent impaired loans.” Collateral values are estimated using Level 3 inputs, consisting of individual appraisals that are significantly adjusted based on certain discounting criteria. At March 31, 2015, appraisals were discounted up to 38.2 percent based on specific market data by location and property type. During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, collateral dependent impaired loans were individually re-measured and reported at fair value through direct loan charge-offs to the allowance for loan losses and/or a specific valuation allowance allocation based on the fair value of the underlying collateral. The collateral dependent loan charge-offs to the allowance for loan losses totaled $850 thousand and $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. At March 31, 2015, collateral dependent impaired loans with a total recorded investment of $11.9 million were reduced by specific valuation allowance allocations totaling $1.9 million to a reported total net carrying amount of $10.0 million.

Loan servicing rights. Fair values for each risk-stratified group of loan servicing rights are calculated using a fair value model from a third party vendor that requires inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (Level 3). The fair value model is based on various assumptions, including but not limited to, prepayment speeds, internal rate of return (“discount rate”), servicing cost, ancillary income, float rate, tax rate, and inflation. The prepayment speed and the discount rate are considered two of the most significant inputs in the model. At March 31, 2015, the fair value model used prepayment speeds (stated as constant prepayment rates) from 0 percent up to 25 percent and a discount rate of 8.0 percent for the valuation of the loan servicing rights. A significant degree of judgment is involved in valuing the loan servicing rights using Level 3 inputs. The use of different assumptions could have a significant positive or negative effect on the fair value estimate. Impairment charges are recognized on loan servicing rights when the amortized cost of a risk-stratified group of loan servicing rights exceeds the estimated fair value. Valley recognized net impairment charges totaling $84 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2015 as compared to approximately $100 thousand of net recoveries of impairment charges for three months ended March 31, 2014.

Foreclosed assets. Certain foreclosed assets (consisting of other real estate owned and other repossessed assets), upon initial recognition and transfer from loans, are re-measured and reported at fair value through a charge-off to the allowance for loan losses based upon the fair value of the foreclosed assets. The fair value of a foreclosed asset,

upon initial recognition, is typically estimated using Level 3 inputs, consisting of an appraisal that is adjusted based on certain discounting criteria, similar to the criteria used for impaired loans described above. The appraisals of foreclosed assets were discounted up to 4.8 percent at March 31, 2015. At March 31, 2015, foreclosed assets included $2.4 million of assets that were measured at fair value upon initial recognition or subsequently re-measured during the quarter ended March 31, 2015. The foreclosed assets charge-offs to the allowance for loan losses totaled $457 thousand and $1.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The re-measurement of foreclosed assets at fair value subsequent to their initial recognition resulted in an immaterial net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and a net loss of $1.8 million within non-interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2014.

Other Fair Value Disclosures

ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments,” requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or non-recurring basis.

The fair value estimates presented in the following table were based on pertinent market data and relevant information on the financial instruments available as of the valuation date. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the entire portfolio of financial instruments. Because no market exists for a portion of the financial instruments, fair value estimates may be based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

Fair value estimates are based on existing balance sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. For instance, Valley has certain fee-generating business lines (e.g., its mortgage servicing operation, trust and investment management departments) that were not considered in these estimates since these activities are not financial instruments. In addition, the tax implications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in any of the estimates.

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments not measured and not reported at fair value on the consolidated statements of financial condition at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were as follows:



	Fair Value Hierarchy	March 31, 2015				December 31, 2014
	Fair Value Hierarchy	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
		(in thousands)
Financial assets
Cash and due from banks	Level 1	$	394,002	$	394,002	$	462,569	$	462,569
Interest bearing deposits with banks	Level 1	370,712		370,712		367,838		367,838
Investment securities held to maturity:
U.S. Treasury securities	Level 1	139,087		153,676		139,121		151,300
U.S. government agency securities	Level 2	13,630		14,040		14,081		14,385
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	Level 2	490,757		512,916		500,018		519,693
Residential mortgage-backed securities	Level 2	1,059,278		1,074,679		986,992		998,981
Trust preferred securities	Level 2	98,458		86,080		98,456		86,243
Corporate and other debt securities	Level 2	24,609		27,234		39,648		45,374
Total investment securities held to maturity		1,825,819		1,868,625		1,778,316		1,815,976
Net loans	Level 3	13,631,830		13,419,880		13,371,560		13,085,830
Accrued interest receivable	Level 1	56,590		56,590		57,333		57,333
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock⁽¹⁾	Level 1	135,032		135,032		133,117		133,117
Financial liabilities
Deposits without stated maturities	Level 1	11,444,508		11,444,508		11,291,648		11,291,648
Deposits with stated maturities	Level 2	2,772,235		2,837,408		2,742,468		2,807,522
Short-term borrowings	Level 1	133,866		133,866		146,781		146,781
Long-term borrowings	Level 2	2,529,073		2,751,489		2,526,408		2,738,122
Junior subordinated debentures issued to capital trusts	Level 2	41,292		43,824		41,252		44,584
Accrued interest payable ⁽²⁾	Level 1	12,448		12,448		15,526		15,526


(1)	Included in other assets.


(2)	Included in accrued expenses and other liabilities.

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of other financial assets and financial liabilities in the table above:

Cash and due from banks and interest bearing deposits with banks. The carrying amount is considered to be a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the short maturity of these items.

Investment securities held to maturity. Fair values are based on prices obtained through an independent pricing service or dealer market participants with whom Valley has historically transacted both purchases and sales of investment securities. Prices obtained from these sources include prices derived from market quotations and matrix pricing. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the bond’s terms and conditions, among other things (Level 2 inputs). Additionally, Valley reviews the volume and level of activity for all classes of held to maturity securities and attempts to identify transactions which may not be orderly or reflective of a significant level of activity and volume. For securities meeting these criteria, the quoted prices received from either market participants or an independent pricing service may be adjusted, as necessary. If applicable, the adjustment to fair value is derived based on present value cash flow model projections prepared by Valley utilizing assumptions similar to those incorporated by market participants.

Loans. Fair values of loans are estimated by discounting the projected future cash flows using market discount rates that reflect the credit and interest-rate risk inherent in the loan. The discount rate is a product of both the applicable index and credit spread, subject to the estimated current new loan interest rates. The credit spread component is static for all maturities and may not necessarily reflect the value of estimating all actual cash flows re-pricing. Projected future cash flows are calculated based upon contractual maturity or call dates, projected repayments and prepayments of principal. Fair values estimated in this manner do not fully incorporate an exit-price approach to fair value, but instead are based on a comparison to current market rates for comparable loans.

Accrued interest receivable and payable. The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate their fair value due to the short-term nature of these items.

Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock. Federal Reserve Bank and FHLB stock are non-marketable equity securities and are reported at their redeemable carrying amounts, which approximate the fair value.

Deposits. The carrying amounts of deposits without stated maturities (i.e., non-interest bearing, savings, NOW, and money market deposits) approximate their estimated fair value. The fair value of time deposits is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows using estimated rates currently offered for alternative funding sources of similar remaining maturity.

Short-term and long-term borrowings. The carrying amounts of certain short-term borrowings, including securities sold under agreements to repurchase (and from time to time, federal funds purchased and FHLB borrowings) approximate their fair values because they frequently re-price to a market rate. The fair values of other short-term and long-term borrowings are estimated by obtaining quoted market prices of the identical or similar financial instruments when available. When quoted prices are unavailable, the fair values of the borrowings are estimated by discounting the estimated future cash flows using current market discount rates of financial instruments with similar characteristics, terms and remaining maturity.

Junior subordinated debentures issued to capital trusts. The fair value of debentures issued to capital trusts is estimated utilizing the income approach, whereby the expected cash flows, over the remaining estimated life of the security, are discounted using Valley’s credit spread over the current yield on a similar maturity of U.S. Treasury security or the three-month LIBOR for the variable rate indexed debentures (Level 2 inputs). The credit spread used to discount the expected cash flows was calculated based on the median current spreads for all fixed and variable publicly traded trust preferred securities issued by banks.

Note 7. Investment Securities

Held to Maturity

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and fair value of securities held to maturity at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were as follows:



	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
	(in thousands)
March 31, 2015
U.S. Treasury securities	$	139,087	$	14,589	$	—		$	153,676
U.S. government agency securities	13,630		410		—			14,040
Obligations of states and political subdivisions:
Obligations of states and state agencies	196,849		10,245		(152		)	206,942
Municipal bonds	293,908		12,152		(86		)	305,974
Total obligations of states and political subdivisions	490,757		22,397		(238		)	512,916
Residential mortgage-backed securities	1,059,278		19,205		(3,804		)	1,074,679
Trust preferred securities	98,458		104		(12,482		)	86,080
Corporate and other debt securities	24,609		2,625		—			27,234
Total investment securities held to maturity	$	1,825,819	$	59,330	$	(16,524	)	$	1,868,625
December 31, 2014
U.S. Treasury securities	$	139,121	$	12,179	$	—		$	151,300
U.S. government agency securities	14,081		304		—			14,385
Obligations of states and political subdivisions:
Obligations of states and state agencies	197,440		9,410		(412		)	206,438
Municipal bonds	302,578		10,955		(278		)	313,255
Total obligations of states and political subdivisions	500,018		20,365		(690		)	519,693
Residential mortgage-backed securities	986,992		18,233		(6,244		)	998,981
Trust preferred securities	98,456		167		(12,380		)	86,243
Corporate and other debt securities	39,648		5,726		—			45,374
Total investment securities held to maturity	$	1,778,316	$	56,974	$	(19,314	)	$	1,815,976

The age of unrealized losses and fair value of related securities held to maturity at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were as follows:



	Less than Twelve Months					More than Twelve Months					Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
	(in thousands)
March 31, 2015
Obligations of states and political subdivisions:
Obligations of states and state agencies	$	22,194	$	(145	)	$	1,961	$	(7	)	$	24,155	$	(152	)
Municipal bonds	11,876		(79		)	10,253		(7		)	22,129		(86		)
Total obligations of states and political subdivisions	34,070		(224		)	12,214		(14		)	46,284		(238		)
Residential mortgage-backed securities	211,113		(1,178		)	177,774		(2,626		)	388,887		(3,804		)
Trust preferred securities	4,825		(16		)	66,111		(12,466		)	70,936		(12,482		)
Total	$	250,008	$	(1,418	)	$	256,099	$	(15,106	)	$	506,107	$	(16,524	)
December 31, 2014
Obligations of states and political subdivisions:
Obligations of states and state agencies	$	4,927	$	(50	)	$	19,050	$	(362	)	$	23,977	$	(412	)
Municipal bonds	—		—			28,815		(278		)	28,815		(278		)
Total obligations of states and political subdivisions	4,927		(50		)	47,865		(640		)	52,792		(690		)
Residential mortgage-backed securities	107,357		(563		)	276,580		(5,681		)	383,937		(6,244		)
Trust preferred securities	—		—			66,194		(12,380		)	66,194		(12,380		)
Total	$	112,284	$	(613	)	$	390,639	$	(18,701	)	$	502,923	$	(19,314	)

The unrealized losses on investment securities held to maturity are primarily due to changes in interest rates (including, in certain cases, changes in credit spreads) and, in some cases, lack of liquidity in the marketplace. The total number of security positions in the securities held to maturity portfolio in an unrealized loss position at March 31, 2015 was 72 as compared to 57 at December 31, 2014.

The unrealized losses within the residential mortgage-backed securities category of the available for sale portfolio at March 31, 2015 largely related to several investment grade securities mainly issued by Ginnie Mae.

The unrealized losses existing for more than twelve months for trust preferred securities at March 31, 2015 primarily related to four non-rated single-issuer trust preferred securities issued by bank holding companies. All single-issuer trust preferred securities classified as held to maturity are paying in accordance with their terms, have no deferrals of interest or defaults and, if applicable, the issuers meet the regulatory capital requirements to be considered “well-capitalized institutions” at March 31, 2015.

Management does not believe that any individual unrealized loss as of March 31, 2015 included in the table above represents other-than-temporary impairment as management mainly attributes the declines in fair value to changes in interest rates and market volatility, not credit quality or other factors. Based on a comparison of the present value of expected cash flows to the amortized cost, management believes there are no credit losses on these securities. Valley does not have the intent to sell, nor is it more likely than not that Valley will be required to sell, the securities contained in the table above before the recovery of their amortized cost basis or maturity.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, Valley sold one corporate debt security classified as held to maturity with amortized costs of $9.8 million. See "Realized Gains and Losses" section below for further details regarding this transaction.

As of March 31, 2015, the fair value of investments held to maturity that were pledged to secure public deposits, repurchase agreements, lines of credit, and for other purposes required by law, was $902.0 million.

The contractual maturities of investments in debt securities held to maturity at March 31, 2015 are set forth in the table below. Maturities may differ from contractual maturities in residential mortgage-backed securities because the mortgages underlying the securities may be prepaid without any penalties. Therefore, residential mortgage-backed securities are not included in the maturity categories in the following summary.



	March 31, 2015
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Due in one year	$	55,838	$	55,861
Due after one year through five years	63,369		67,976
Due after five years through ten years	330,116		352,827
Due after ten years	317,218		317,282
Residential mortgage-backed securities	1,059,278		1,074,679
Total investment securities held to maturity	$	1,825,819	$	1,868,625

Actual maturities of debt securities may differ from those presented above since certain obligations provide the issuer the right to call or prepay the obligation prior to scheduled maturity without penalty.

The weighted-average remaining expected life for residential mortgage-backed securities held to maturity was 6.7 years at March 31, 2015.

Available for Sale

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and fair value of securities available for sale at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were as follows:



	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
	(in thousands)
March 31, 2015
U.S. Treasury securities	$	51,058	$	17	$	(602	)	$	50,473
U.S. government agency securities	26,721		712		(94		)	27,339
Obligations of states and political subdivisions:
Obligations of states and state agencies	11,101		118		—			11,219
Municipal bonds	33,331		97		(440		)	32,988
Total obligations of states and political subdivisions	44,432		215		(440		)	44,207
Residential mortgage-backed securities	615,880		6,081		(4,246		)	617,715
Trust preferred securities*	10,641		—		(2,103		)	8,538
Corporate and other debt securities	73,241		1,712		(451		)	74,502
Equity securities	21,071		784		(1,111		)	20,744
Total investment securities available for sale	$	843,044	$	9,521	$	(9,047	)	$	843,518
December 31, 2014
U.S. Treasury securities	$	51,063	$	2	$	(1,622	)	$	49,443
U.S. government agency securities	33,163		748		(86		)	33,825
Obligations of states and political subdivisions:
Obligations of states and state agencies	11,160		—		(24		)	11,136
Municipal bonds	33,340		127		(552		)	32,915
Total obligations of states and political subdivisions	44,500		127		(576		)	44,051
Residential mortgage-backed securities	643,382		5,854		(4,960		)	644,276
Trust preferred securities*	23,194		296		(2,953		)	20,537
Corporate and other debt securities	73,585		1,645		(1,218		)	74,012
Equity securities	21,071		671		(916		)	20,826
Total investment securities available for sale	$	889,958	$	9,343	$	(12,331	)	$	886,970



*	Includes two and three pooled trust preferred securities, principally collateralized by securities issued by banks and insurance companies, at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

The age of unrealized losses and fair value of related securities available for sale at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were as follows:



	Less than Twelve Months					More than Twelve Months					Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
	(in thousands)
March 31, 2015
U.S. Treasury securities	$	49,520	$	(602	)	$	—	$	—		$	49,520	$	(602	)
U.S. government agency securities	—		—			5,293		(94		)	5,293		(94		)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions:
Municipal bonds	19,072		(204		)	11,044		(236		)	30,116		(440		)
Total obligations of states and political subdivisions	19,072		(204		)	11,044		(236		)	30,116		(440		)
Residential mortgage-backed securities	32,256		(518		)	216,266		(3,728		)	248,522		(4,246		)
Trust preferred securities	—		—			8,538		(2,103		)	8,538		(2,103		)
Corporate and other debt securities	18,987		(43		)	27,622		(408		)	46,609		(451		)
Equity securities	46		(3		)	14,533		(1,108		)	14,579		(1,111		)
Total	$	119,881	$	(1,370	)	$	283,296	$	(7,677	)	$	403,177	$	(9,047	)
December 31, 2014
U.S. Treasury securities	$	—	$	—		$	48,504	$	(1,622	)	$	48,504	$	(1,622	)
U.S. government agency securities	—		—			5,442		(86		)	5,442		(86		)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions:
Obligations of states and state agencies	—		—			11,136		(24		)	11,136		(24		)
Municipal bonds	13,337		(426		)	14,637		(126		)	27,974		(552		)
Total obligations of states and political subdivisions	13,337		(426		)	25,773		(150		)	39,110		(576		)
Residential mortgage-backed securities	57,543		(121		)	244,910		(4,839		)	302,453		(4,960		)
Trust preferred securities	2,210		(117		)	12,085		(2,836		)	14,295		(2,953		)
Corporate and other debt securities	27,500		(294		)	28,269		(924		)	55,769		(1,218		)
Equity securities	158		(41		)	14,769		(875		)	14,927		(916		)
Total	$	100,748	$	(999	)	$	379,752	$	(11,332	)	$	480,500	$	(12,331	)

The unrealized losses on investment securities available for sale are primarily due to changes in interest rates (including, in certain cases, changes in credit spreads) and, in some cases, lack of liquidity in the marketplace. The total number of security positions in the securities available for sale portfolio in an unrealized loss position at March 31, 2015 was 83 as compared to 96 at December 31, 2014.

The unrealized losses for trust preferred securities at March 31, 2015 for more than twelve months in the table above largely relate to 2 pooled trust preferred securities with an amortized cost of $10.6 million and a fair value of $8.5 million. One of the one pooled trust preferred securities had a unrealized loss of $1.4 million and an investment grade rating at March 31, 2015. The second pooled trust preferred security had a non-investment grade rating and was initially other-than-temporarily impaired in 2008 with additional estimated credit losses recognized in 2009 and 2011, and is not accruing interest. All of the single-issuer trust preferred securities are paying in accordance with their terms and have

no deferrals of interest or defaults and, if applicable, meet the regulatory capital requirements to be considered “well-capitalized institutions” at March 31, 2015.

Management does not believe that any individual unrealized loss as of March 31, 2015 represents an other-than-temporary impairment, as management mainly attributes the declines in value to changes in interest rates and market volatility, not credit quality or other factors. Based on a comparison of the present value of expected cash flows to the amortized cost, management believes there are no credit losses on these securities. Valley has no intent to sell, nor is it more likely than not that Valley will be required to sell, the securities contained in the table above before the recovery of their amortized cost basis or, if necessary, maturity.

As of March 31, 2015, the fair value of securities available for sale that were pledged to secure public deposits, repurchase agreements, lines of credit, and for other purposes required by law, was $396.7 million.

The contractual maturities of investment securities available for sale at March 31, 2015 are set forth in the following table. Maturities may differ from contractual maturities in residential mortgage-backed securities because the mortgages underlying the securities may be prepaid without any penalties. Therefore, residential mortgage-backed securities are not included in the maturity categories in the following summary.



	March 31, 2015
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Due after one year through five years	$	65,316	$	66,915
Due after five years through ten years	79,110		78,201
Due after ten years	61,667		59,943
Residential mortgage-backed securities	615,880		617,715
Equity securities	21,071		20,744
Total investment securities available for sale	$	843,044	$	843,518

The weighted average remaining expected life for residential mortgage-backed securities available for sale at March 31, 2015 was 5.2 years.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Analysis

Valley records impairment charges on its investment securities when the decline in fair value is considered other-than-temporary. Numerous factors, including lack of liquidity for re-sales of certain investment securities; decline in the creditworthiness of the issuer; absence of reliable pricing information for investment securities; adverse changes in business climate; adverse actions by regulators; prolonged decline in value of equity investments; or unanticipated changes in the competitive environment could have a negative effect on Valley’s investment portfolio and may result in other-than-temporary impairment on certain investment securities in future periods. Valley’s investment portfolios include private label mortgage-backed securities, trust preferred securities principally issued by bank holding companies (including two pooled trust preferred securities), corporate bonds primarily issued by banks, and perpetual preferred and common equity securities issued by banks. These investments may pose a higher risk of future impairment charges by Valley as a result of the unpredictable nature of the U.S. economy and its potential negative effect on the future performance of the security issuers and, if applicable, the underlying mortgage loan collateral of the security.

There were no other-than-temporary impairment losses on securities recognized in earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014. At March 31, 2015, four previously impaired private label mortgage-backed securities (prior to December 31, 2012) had a combined amortized cost and fair value of $13.3 million and $13.4 million, respectively, while one previously impaired pooled trust preferred security had a combined amortized cost and fair value of $2.8 million and $2.0 million, respectively. The previously impaired pooled trust preferred security was not accruing interest

during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014. Additionally, one previously impaired pooled trust preferred security was sold during the first quarter of 2015 for an immaterial gain. See the table and discussion below for additional information.

The following table presents the changes in the credit loss component of cumulative other-than-temporary impairment losses on debt securities classified as either held to maturity or available for sale that Valley has previously recognized in earnings, for which a portion of the impairment loss (non-credit factors) was recognized in other comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015			2014
	(in thousands)
Balance, beginning of period	$	8,947		$	9,990
Accretion of credit loss impairment due to an increase in expected cash flows	(144		)	(198		)
Sales	(2,382		)	—
Balance, end of period	$	6,421		$	9,792

The credit loss component of the impairment loss represents the difference between the present value of expected future cash flows and the amortized cost basis of the security prior to considering credit losses. The beginning balance represents the credit loss component for debt securities for which other-than-temporary impairment occurred prior to each period presented. Other-than-temporary impairments recognized in earnings for credit impaired debt securities are presented as additions in two components based upon whether the current period is the first time the debt security was credit impaired (initial credit impairment) or is not the first time the debt security was credit impaired (subsequent credit impairment). The credit loss component is reduced if Valley sells, intends to sell or believes it will be required to sell previously credit impaired debt securities. Additionally, the credit loss component is reduced if (i) Valley receives cash flows in excess of what it expected to receive over the remaining life of the credit impaired debt security, (ii) the security matures or (iii) the security is fully written down.

Realized Gains and Losses

Gross gains (losses) realized on sales, maturities and other securities transactions related to investment securities included in earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 were as follows:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015			2014
	(in thousands)
Sales transactions:
Gross gains	$	3,274		$	—
Gross losses	(947		)	—
	$	2,327		$	—
Maturities and other securities transactions:
Gross gains	$	89		$	1
Gross losses	—			(9		)
	$	89		$	(8	)
Total gains on securities transactions, net	$	2,416		$	(8	)

Valley recognized gross gains from sales transactions of investment securities totaling $3.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 due to the sale of corporate debt securities and trust preferred securities with amortized cost totaling $25.9 million. These transactions included a corporate debt security classified as held to maturity and a previously impaired pooled trust preferred security with amortized costs of $9.8 million and $2.6 million, respectively. Additionally, Valley recognized $947 thousand of gross losses during the first quarter of 2015 due to the sale of mostly

trust preferred securities with a total amortized cost of $8.3 million. The vast majority of the sales of investment securities were due to a one-time investment portfolio re-balancing during the first quarter due to changes in our regulatory capital calculation under the new Basel III regulatory capital reform (effective for Valley on January 1, 2015). Under ASC Topic 320, “Investments - Debt and Equity Securities,” the one-time sale of held to maturity securities based upon the change in capital requirements is permitted without tainting the remaining held to maturity investment portfolio.

Trading Securities

The fair value of trading securities (consisting of 2 single-issuer bank trust preferred securities) was $14.2 million at December 31, 2014. During the first quarter of 2015, one of the two securities was redeemed by the issuer and the other security was sold prior to its issuer's call date in April 2015. Both of the securities transactions resulted in an immaterial aggregate net trading loss for the first quarter of 2015 which was included in the other non-interest income category of our consolidated statements of income. Net trading losses were also immaterial for the three months ended March 31, 2014. Interest income on trading securities totaled $213 thousand and $290 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Note 8. Loans

The detail of the loan portfolio as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was as follows:



	March 31, 2015						December 31, 2014
	Non-PCI Loans		PCI Loans		Total		Non-PCI Loans		PCI Loans		Total
	(in thousands)
Non-covered loans:
Commercial and industrial	$	2,094,274	$	267,713	$	2,361,987	$	1,959,927	$	277,371	$	2,237,298
Commercial real estate:
Commercial real estate	5,142,588		954,429		6,097,017		5,053,742		978,448		6,032,190
Construction	483,683		55,254		538,937		476,094		53,869		529,963
Total commercial real estate loans	5,626,271		1,009,683		6,635,954		5,529,836		1,032,317		6,562,153
Residential mortgage	2,495,827		89,955		2,585,782		2,419,044		96,631		2,515,675
Consumer:
Home equity	394,886		87,379		482,265		400,136		91,609		491,745
Automobile	1,162,919		44		1,162,963		1,144,780		51		1,144,831
Other consumer	311,102		10,682		321,784		298,389		11,931		310,320
Total consumer loans	1,868,907		98,105		1,967,012		1,843,305		103,591		1,946,896
Total non-covered loans	12,085,279		1,465,456		13,550,735		11,752,112		1,509,910		13,262,022
Covered loans:
Commercial and industrial	—		5,940		5,940		—		13,813		13,813
Commercial real estate	—		108,856		108,856		—		128,691		128,691
Construction	—		3,077		3,077		—		3,171		3,171
Residential mortgage	—		62,229		62,229		—		60,697		60,697
Consumer	—		3,624		3,624		—		5,519		5,519
Total covered loans	—		183,726		183,726		—		211,891		211,891
Total loans	$	12,085,279	$	1,649,182	$	13,734,461	$	11,752,112	$	1,721,801	$	13,473,913

Total non-covered loans are net of unearned discount and deferred loan fees totaling $9.2 million and $9.0 million at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. The outstanding balances (representing contractual balances

owed to Valley) for non-covered PCI loans and covered loans totaled $1.6 billion and $214.9 million at March 31, 2015, respectively, and $1.6 billion and $253.7 million at December 31, 2014, respectively.

There were no sales of loans from the held for investment portfolio during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans (Including Covered Loans)

PCI loans, which include loans acquired in FDIC-assisted transactions ("covered loans"), are accounted for in accordance with ASC Subtopic 310-30 and are initially recorded at fair value (as determined by the present value of expected future cash flows) with no valuation allowance (i.e., the allowance for loan losses), and aggregated and accounted for as pools of loans based on common risk characteristics. The difference between the undiscounted cash flows expected at acquisition and the initial carrying amount (fair value) of the PCI loans, or the “accretable yield,” is recognized as interest income utilizing the level-yield method over the life of each pool. Contractually required payments for interest and principal that exceed the undiscounted cash flows expected at acquisition, or the “non-accretable difference,” are not recognized as a yield adjustment, as a loss accrual or a valuation allowance. Reclassifications of the non-accretable difference to the accretable yield may occur subsequent to the loan acquisition dates due to increases in expected cash flows of the loan pools.

The following table presents changes in the accretable yield for PCI loans during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015			2014
	(in thousands)
Balance, beginning of period	$	336,208		$	223,799
Accretion	(26,350		)	(13,934		)
Balance, end of period	$	309,858		$	209,865

FDIC Loss-Share Receivable

The receivable arising from the loss-sharing agreements (referred to as the “FDIC loss-share receivable” on our consolidated statements of financial condition) is measured separately from the covered loan portfolio because the agreements are not contractually part of the covered loans and are not transferable should the Bank choose to dispose of the covered loans.

Changes in the FDIC loss-share receivable for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 were as follows:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015			2014
	(in thousands)
Balance, beginning of the period	$	13,848		$	32,757
Discount accretion of the present value at the acquisition dates	43			11
Effect of additional cash flows on covered loans (prospective recognition)	(4,072		)	(1,856		)
Other reimbursable expenses	98			513
Reimbursements from the FDIC	(1,954		)	(1,424		)
Other	(355		)	1,256
Balance, end of the period	$	7,608		$	31,257

both the receivable and non-interest income) during the first quarter of 2015 was mainly caused by the increase in our prospective recognition of the effect of additional cash flows from certain pooled loans. Valley does not expect a reduction in non-interest income related to additional cash flows on pooled loans during the second quarter of 2015, as the receivable was prospectively reduced for such additional cash flows over the shorter term of the commercial loan loss-sharing agreements (related to Valley's 2010 FDIC-assisted transactions) that expired in March 2015.

Loan Portfolio Risk Elements and Credit Risk Management

Credit risk management. For all of its loan types discussed below, Valley adheres to a credit policy designed to minimize credit risk while generating the maximum income given the level of risk. Management reviews and approves these policies and procedures on a regular basis with subsequent approval by the Board of Directors annually. Credit authority relating to a significant dollar percentage of the overall portfolio is centralized and controlled by the Credit Risk Management Division and by the Credit Committee. A reporting system supplements the management review process by providing management with frequent reports concerning loan production, loan quality, concentrations of credit, loan delinquencies, non-performing, and potential problem loans. Loan portfolio diversification is an important factor utilized by Valley to manage its risk across business sectors and through cyclical economic circumstances.

Commercial and industrial loans. A significant proportion of Valley’s commercial and industrial loan portfolio is granted to long-standing customers of proven ability and strong repayment performance. Underwriting standards are designed to assess the borrower’s ability to generate recurring cash flow sufficient to meet the debt service requirements of loans granted. While such recurring cash flow serves as the primary source of repayment, a significant number of the loans are collateralized by borrower assets intended to serve as a secondary source of repayment should the need arise. Anticipated cash flows of borrowers, however, may not be as expected and the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value, or in the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the ability of the borrower to collect all amounts due from its customers. Short-term loans may be made on an unsecured basis based on a borrower’s financial strength and past performance. Valley, in most cases, will obtain the personal guarantee of the borrower’s principals to mitigate the risk. Unsecured loans, when made, are generally granted to the Bank’s most credit worthy borrowers. Unsecured commercial and industrial loans totaled $358.9 million and $345.1 million at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

Commercial real estate loans. Commercial real estate loans are subject to underwriting standards and processes similar to commercial and industrial loans. Commercial real estate loans are viewed primarily as cash flow loans and secondarily as loans secured by real property. Loans generally involve larger principal balances and longer repayment periods as compared to commercial and industrial loans. Repayment of most loans is dependent upon the cash flow generated from the property securing the loan or the business that occupies the property. Commercial real estate loans may be more adversely affected by conditions in the real estate markets or in the general economy and accordingly conservative loan to value ratios are required at origination, as well as stress tested to evaluate the impact of market changes relating to key underwriting elements. The properties securing the commercial real estate portfolio represent diverse types, with most properties located within Valley’s primary markets.

Construction loans. With respect to loans to developers and builders, Valley originates and manages construction loans structured on either a revolving or non-revolving basis, depending on the nature of the underlying development project. These loans are generally secured by the real estate to be developed and may also be secured by additional real estate to mitigate the risk. Non-revolving construction loans often involve the disbursement of substantially all committed funds with repayment substantially dependent on the successful completion and sale, or lease, of the project. Sources of repayment for these types of loans may be from pre-committed permanent loans from other lenders, sales of developed property, or an interim loan commitment from Valley until permanent financing is obtained elsewhere. Revolving construction loans (generally relating to single-family residential construction) are controlled with loan advances dependent upon the pre-sale of housing units financed. These loans are closely monitored by on-site inspections and are considered to have higher risks than other real estate loans due to their ultimate repayment being sensitive to interest rate changes, governmental regulation of real property, general economic conditions and the availability of long-term financing.

Residential mortgages. Valley originates residential, first mortgage loans based on underwriting standards that generally comply with Fannie Mae and/or Freddie Mac requirements. Appraisals and valuations of real estate collateral are contracted directly with independent appraisers or from valuation services and not through appraisal management companies. The Bank’s appraisal management policy and procedure is in accordance with regulatory requirements and guidance issued by the Bank’s primary regulator. Credit scoring, using FICO® and other proprietary credit scoring models, is employed in the ultimate, judgmental credit decision by Valley’s underwriting staff. Valley does not use third party contract underwriting services. Residential mortgage loans include fixed and variable interest rate loans secured by one to four family homes generally located in northern and central New Jersey, the New York City metropolitan area, and eastern Pennsylvania, and to a much lesser extent central and southeast Florida. Valley’s ability to be repaid on such loans is closely linked to the economic and real estate market conditions in this region. In deciding whether to originate each residential mortgage, Valley considers the qualifications of the borrower as well as the value of the underlying property.

Home equity loans. Home equity lending consists of both fixed and variable interest rate products. Valley mainly provides home equity loans to its residential mortgage customers within the footprint of its primary lending territory. Valley generally will not exceed a combined (i.e., first and second mortgage) loan-to-value ratio of 75 percent when originating a home equity loan.

Automobile loans. Valley uses both judgmental and scoring systems in the credit decision process for automobile loans. Automobile originations (including light truck and sport utility vehicles) are largely produced via indirect channels, originated through approved automobile dealers. Automotive collateral is generally a depreciating asset and there are times in the life of an automobile loan where the amount owed on a vehicle may exceed its collateral value. Additionally, automobile charge-offs will vary based on strength or weakness in the used vehicle market, original advance rate, when in the life cycle of a loan a default occurs and the condition of the collateral being liquidated. Where permitted by law, and subject to the limitations of the bankruptcy code, deficiency judgments are sought and acted upon to ultimately collect all money owed, even when a default resulted in a loss at collateral liquidation. Valley uses a third party to actively track collision and comprehensive risk insurance required of the borrower on the automobile and this third party provides coverage to Valley in the event of an uninsured collateral loss.

Other consumer loans. Valley’s other consumer loan portfolio includes direct consumer term loans, both secured and unsecured. The other consumer loan portfolio includes exposures in credit card loans, personal lines of credit, personal loans and loans secured by cash surrender value of life insurance. Valley believes the aggregate risk exposure of these loans and lines of credit was not significant at March 31, 2015. Unsecured consumer loans totaled approximately $30.3 million and $31.4 million, including $7.0 million and $7.6 million of credit card loans, at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

Credit Quality

The following table presents past due, non-accrual and current loans (excluding PCI loans, which are accounted for on a pool basis, and non-performing loans held for sale) by loan portfolio class at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014:



	Past Due and Non-Accrual Loans
	30-59 Days Past Due Loans		60-89 Days Past Due Loans		Accruing Loans 90 Days or More Past Due		Non-Accrual Loans		Total Past Due Loans		Current Non-PCI Loans		Total Non-PCI Loans
	(in thousands)
March 31, 2015
Commercial and industrial	$	4,472	$	90	$	208	$	8,285	$	13,055	$	2,081,219	$	2,094,274
Commercial real estate:
Commercial real estate	4,775		1,883		2,792		24,850		34,300		5,108,288		5,142,588
Construction	6,577		—		—		5,144		11,721		471,962		483,683
Total commercial real estate loans	11,352		1,883		2,792		29,994		46,021		5,580,250		5,626,271
Residential mortgage	12,498		1,782		564		17,127		31,971		2,463,856		2,495,827
Consumer loans:
Home equity	1,170		380		—		2,042		3,592		391,294		394,886
Automobile	1,594		415		251		—		2,260		1,160,659		1,162,919
Other consumer	111		42		11		96		260		310,842		311,102
Total consumer loans	2,875		837		262		2,138		6,112		1,862,795		1,868,907
Total	$	31,197	$	4,592	$	3,826	$	57,544	$	97,159	$	11,988,120	$	12,085,279
December 31, 2014
Commercial and industrial	$	1,630	$	1,102	$	226	$	8,467	$	11,425	$	1,948,502	$	1,959,927
Commercial real estate:
Commercial real estate	8,938		113		49		22,098		31,198		5,022,544		5,053,742
Construction	448		—		3,988		5,223		9,659		466,435		476,094
Total commercial real estate loans	9,386		113		4,037		27,321		40,857		5,488,979		5,529,836
Residential mortgage	6,200		3,575		1,063		17,760		28,598		2,390,446		2,419,044
Consumer loans:
Home equity	761		282		—		2,022		3,065		397,071		400,136
Automobile	1,902		391		126		90		2,509		1,142,271		1,144,780
Other consumer	319		91		26		97		533		297,856		298,389
Total consumer loans	2,982		764		152		2,209		6,107		1,837,198		1,843,305
Total	$	20,198	$	5,554	$	5,478	$	55,757	$	86,987	$	11,665,125	$	11,752,112

Impaired loans. Impaired loans, consisting of non-accrual commercial and industrial loans and commercial real estate loans over $250 thousand and all loans which were modified in troubled debt restructuring, are individually evaluated for impairment. PCI loans are not classified as impaired loans because they are accounted for on a pool basis.

The following table presents the information about impaired loans by loan portfolio class at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014:



	Recorded Investment With No Related Allowance		Recorded Investment With Related Allowance		Total Recorded Investment		Unpaid Contractual Principal Balance		Related Allowance
	(in thousands)
March 31, 2015
Commercial and industrial	$	6,214	$	21,665	$	27,879	$	33,471	$	4,824
Commercial real estate:
Commercial real estate	32,856		47,703		80,559		83,068		4,918
Construction	13,197		2,962		16,159		20,825		1,008
Total commercial real estate loans	46,053		50,665		96,718		103,893		5,926
Residential mortgage	6,840		15,254		22,094		23,898		1,432
Consumer loans:
Home equity	324		4,197		4,521		4,622		764
Total consumer loans	324		4,197		4,521		4,622		764
Total	$	59,431	$	91,781	$	151,212	$	165,884	$	12,946
December 31, 2014
Commercial and industrial	$	6,579	$	21,645	$	28,224	$	33,677	$	4,929
Commercial real estate:
Commercial real estate	29,784		44,713		74,497		77,007		5,342
Construction	14,502		2,299		16,801		20,694		160
Total commercial real estate loans	44,286		47,012		91,298		97,701		5,502
Residential mortgage	6,509		15,831		22,340		24,311		1,629
Consumer loans:
Home equity	235		2,911		3,146		3,247		465
Total consumer loans	235		2,911		3,146		3,247		465
Total	$	57,609	$	87,399	$	145,008	$	158,936	$	12,525

The following table presents by loan portfolio class, the average recorded investment and interest income recognized on impaired loans for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015				2014
	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
	(in thousands)
Commercial and industrial	$	28,282	$	246	$	46,784	$	369
Commercial real estate:
Commercial real estate	78,523		486		97,542		645
Construction	16,670		150		19,638		144
Total commercial real estate loans	95,193		636		117,180		789
Residential mortgage	21,843		250		27,509		260
Consumer loans:
Home equity	3,485		30		1,076		13
Total consumer loans	3,485		30		1,076		13
Total	$	148,803	$	1,162	$	192,549	$	1,431

Interest income recognized on a cash basis (included in the table above) was immaterial for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

Troubled debt restructured loans. From time to time, Valley may extend, restructure, or otherwise modify the terms of existing loans, on a case-by-case basis, to remain competitive and retain certain customers, as well as assist other customers who may be experiencing financial difficulties. If the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties and a concession has been made at the time of such modification, the loan is classified as a troubled debt restructured loan (TDR). Valley’s PCI loans are excluded from the TDR disclosures below because they are evaluated for impairment on a pool by pool basis. When an individual PCI loan within a pool is modified as a TDR, it is not removed from its pool. All TDRs are classified as impaired loans and are included in the impaired loan disclosures above.

The majority of the concessions made for TDRs involve lowering the monthly payments on loans through either a reduction in interest rate below a market rate, an extension of the term of the loan without a corresponding adjustment to the risk premium reflected in the interest rate, or a combination of these two methods. The concessions rarely result in the forgiveness of principal or accrued interest. In addition, Valley frequently obtains additional collateral or guarantor support when modifying such loans. If the borrower has demonstrated performance under the previous terms and Valley’s underwriting process shows the borrower has the capacity to continue to perform under the restructured terms, the loan will continue to accrue interest. Non-accruing restructured loans may be returned to accrual status when there has been a sustained period of repayment performance (generally six consecutive months of payments) and both principal and interest are deemed collectible.

Performing TDRs (not reported as non-accrual loans) totaled $100.5 million and $97.7 million as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Non-performing TDRs totaled $18.8 million and $19.4 million as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

The following table presents loans by loan portfolio class modified as TDRs during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014. The pre-modification and post-modification outstanding recorded investments disclosed in the table below represent the loan carrying amounts immediately prior to the modification and the carrying amounts at March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2015					Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
Troubled Debt Restructurings	Number of Contracts	Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Number of Contracts	Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
	($ in thousands)
Commercial and industrial	6	$	1,584	$	1,534	11	$	9,762	$	9,093
Commercial real estate:
Commercial real estate	1	5,000		5,000		5	15,946		15,060
Construction	—	—		—		1	4,827		4,827
Total commercial real estate	1	5,000		5,000		6	20,773		19,887
Residential mortgage	1	280		278		—	—		—
Total	8	$	6,864	$	6,812	17	$	30,535	$	28,980

The majority of the TDR concessions made during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 involved an extension of the loan term. The total TDRs presented in the above table had allocated specific reserves for loan losses totaling $759 thousand and $2.1 million at March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. These specific reserves are included in the allowance for loan losses for loans individually evaluated for impairment disclosed in Note 9. Partial loan charge-offs related to loans modified as TDRs in the table above totaled $861 thousand during the three months ended March 31, 2014. There were no charge-offs related to TDR modifications during the three months ended March 31, 2015.

There were no non-PCI loans modified as TDRs within the previous 12 months for which there was a payment default (90 days or more past due) during the three months ended March 31, 2015.

Credit quality indicators. Valley utilizes an internal loan classification system as a means of reporting problem loans within commercial and industrial, commercial real estate, and construction loan portfolio classes. Under Valley’s internal risk rating system, loan relationships could be classified as “Pass,” “Special Mention,” “Substandard,” “Doubtful,” and “Loss.” Substandard loans include loans that exhibit well-defined weakness and are characterized by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Loans classified as Doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as Substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make collection or liquidation in full, based on currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. Loans classified as Loss are those considered uncollectible with insignificant value and are charged-off immediately to the allowance for loan losses. Loans that do not currently pose a sufficient risk to warrant classification in one of the aforementioned categories, but pose weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention are deemed Special Mention. Loans rated as Pass do not currently pose any identified risk and can range from the highest to average quality, depending on the degree of potential risk. Risk ratings are updated any time the situation warrants.

The following table presents the risk category of loans (excluding PCI loans) by class of loans based on the most recent analysis performed at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.



Credit exposure - by internally assigned risk rating	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total Non-PCI Loans
	(in thousands)
March 31, 2015
Commercial and industrial	$	1,970,835	$	67,846	$	52,448	$	3,145	$	2,094,274
Commercial real estate	4,986,138		42,198		114,252		—		5,142,588
Construction	464,080		1,633		15,499		2,471		483,683
Total	$	7,421,053	$	111,677	$	182,199	$	5,616	$	7,720,545
December 31, 2014
Commercial and industrial	$	1,865,472	$	50,453	$	44,002	$	—	$	1,959,927
Commercial real estate	4,903,185		40,232		110,325		—		5,053,742
Construction	455,145		1,923		16,482		2,544		476,094
Total	$	7,223,802	$	92,608	$	170,809	$	2,544	$	7,489,763

For residential mortgages, automobile, home equity and other consumer loan portfolio classes (excluding PCI loans), Valley also evaluates credit quality based on the aging status of the loan, which was previously presented, and by payment activity. The following table presents the recorded investment in those loan classes based on payment activity as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014:



Credit exposure - by payment activity	Performing Loans		Non-Performing Loans		Total Non-PCI Loans
	(in thousands)
March 31, 2015
Residential mortgage	$	2,478,700	$	17,127	$	2,495,827
Home equity	392,844		2,042		394,886
Automobile	1,162,919		—		1,162,919
Other consumer	311,006		96		311,102
Total	$	4,345,469	$	19,265	$	4,364,734
December 31, 2014
Residential mortgage	$	2,401,284	$	17,760	$	2,419,044
Home equity	398,114		2,022		400,136
Automobile	1,144,690		90		1,144,780
Other consumer	298,292		97		298,389
Total	$	4,242,380	$	19,969	$	4,262,349

Valley evaluates the credit quality of its PCI loan pools based on the expectation of the underlying cash flows of each pool, derived from the aging status and by payment activity of individual loans within the pool. The following table presents the recorded investment in PCI loans by class based on individual loan payment activity as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.



Credit exposure - by payment activity	Performing Loans		Non-Performing Loans		Total PCI Loans
	(in thousands)
March 31, 2015
Commercial and industrial	$	253,446	$	20,207	$	273,653
Commercial real estate	1,054,600		8,685		1,063,285
Construction	57,204		1,127		58,331
Residential mortgage	148,972		3,212		152,184
Consumer	90,040		11,689		101,729
Total	$	1,604,262	$	44,920	$	1,649,182
December 31, 2014
Commercial and industrial	$	272,027	$	19,157	$	291,184
Commercial real estate	1,091,784		15,355		1,107,139
Construction	52,802		4,238		57,040
Residential mortgage	153,789		3,539		157,328
Consumer	103,686		5,424		109,110
Total	$	1,674,088	$	47,713	$	1,721,801

Other real estate owned totaled $21.8 million at March 31, 2015 and included foreclosed residential real estate properties totaling $6.7 million. Residential mortgage and consumer loans secured by residential real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings are in process totaled $14.4 million at March 31, 2015.

Note 9. Allowance for Credit Losses

The allowance for credit losses consists of the allowance for losses on non-covered loans and allowance for losses on covered loans related to credit impairment of certain covered loan pools subsequent to acquisition, as well as the allowance for unfunded letters of credit. Management maintains the allowance for credit losses at a level estimated to

absorb probable loan losses of the loan portfolio and unfunded letter of credit commitments at the balance sheet date. The allowance for losses on non-covered loans is based on ongoing evaluations of the probable estimated losses inherent in the non-covered loan portfolio, including unexpected credit impairment or reduction in the provision of non-covered PCI loan pools subsequent to the acquisition date.

The following table summarizes the allowance for credit losses at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014:



	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
	(in thousands)
Components of allowance for credit losses:
Allowance for non-covered loans	$	102,431	$	102,153
Allowance for covered loans	200		200
Total allowance for loan losses	102,631		102,353
Allowance for unfunded letters of credit	1,934		1,934
Total allowance for credit losses	$	104,565	$	104,287

The following table summarizes the provision for credit losses for the periods indicated:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015		2014
	(in thousands)
Components of provision for credit losses:
Provision for non-covered loans	$	—	$	4,949
Provision for covered loans	—		—
Total provision for loan losses	—		4,949
Provision for unfunded letters of credit	—		(951		)
Total provision for credit losses	$	—	$	3,998

The following table details activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014:



	Commercial and Industrial			Commercial Real Estate			Residential Mortgage			Consumer			Unallocated			Total
	(in thousands)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2015:
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance	$	43,676		$	42,840		$	5,093		$	5,179		$	5,565		$	102,353
Loans charged-off ⁽¹⁾	(753		)	(150		)	(49		)	(714		)	—			(1,666		)
Charged-off loans recovered	1,051			460			114			319			—			1,944
Net recoveries (charge-offs)	298			310			65			(395		)	—			278
Provision for loan losses	919			(1,494		)	(1,066		)	188			1,453			—
Ending balance	$	44,893		$	41,656		$	4,092		$	4,972		$	7,018		$	102,631
Three Months Ended March 31, 2014:
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance	$	51,551		$	42,343		$	7,786		$	4,359		$	7,578		$	113,617
Loans charged-off ⁽¹⁾	(8,614		)	(4,490		)	(63		)	(1,072		)	—			(14,239		)
Charged-off loans recovered	544			1,337			79			422			—			2,382
Net charge-offs	(8,070		)	(3,153		)	16			(650		)	—			(11,857		)
Provision for loan losses	6,451			(808		)	(823		)	398			(269		)	4,949
Ending balance	$	49,932		$	38,382		$	6,979		$	4,107		$	7,309		$	106,709

The following table represents the allocation of the allowance for loan losses and the related loans by loan portfolio segment disaggregated based on the impairment methodology at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.



	Commercial and Industrial		Commercial Real Estate		Residential Mortgage		Consumer		Unallocated		Total
	(in thousands)
March 31, 2015
Allowance for loan losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	4,824	$	5,926	$	1,432	$	764	$	—	$	12,946
Collectively evaluated for impairment	39,899		35,730		2,630		4,208		7,018		89,485
Loans acquired with discounts related to credit quality	170		—		30		—		—		200
Total	$	44,893	$	41,656	$	4,092	$	4,972	$	7,018	$	102,631
Loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	27,879	$	96,718	$	22,094	$	4,521	$	—	$	151,212
Collectively evaluated for impairment	2,066,395		5,529,553		2,473,733		1,864,386		—		11,934,067
Loans acquired with discounts related to credit quality	273,653		1,121,616		152,184		101,729		—		1,649,182
Total	$	2,367,927	$	6,747,887	$	2,648,011	$	1,970,636	$	—	$	13,734,461
December 31, 2014
Allowance for loan losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	4,929	$	5,502	$	1,629	$	465	$	—	$	12,525
Collectively evaluated for impairment	38,577		37,338		3,434		4,714		5,565		89,628
Loans acquired with discounts related to credit quality	170		—		30		—		—		200
Total	$	43,676	$	42,840	$	5,093	$	5,179	$	5,565	$	102,353
Loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	28,224	$	91,298	$	22,340	$	3,146	$	—	$	145,008
Collectively evaluated for impairment	1,931,703		5,438,538		2,396,704		1,840,159		—		11,607,104
Loans acquired with discounts related to credit quality	291,184		1,164,179		157,328		109,110		—		1,721,801
Total	$	2,251,111	$	6,694,015	$	2,576,372	$	1,952,415	$	—	$	13,473,913

Note 10. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill as allocated to Valley's business segments, or reporting units thereof, for goodwill impairment analysis were:



	Business Segment / Reporting Unit*
	Wealth Management		Consumer Lending		Commercial Lending		Investment Management		Total
	(in thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2014	$	20,517	$	168,922	$	252,900	$	133,553	$	575,892
Goodwill from business combinations	—		450		869		323		1,642
Balance at March 31, 2015	$	20,517	$	169,372	$	253,769	$	133,876	$	577,534


*	Valley’s Wealth Management Division is comprised of trust, asset management, and insurance services. This reporting unit is included in the Consumer Lending segment for financial reporting purposes.

Goodwill from business combinations, in the table above, represents the effect of the combined adjustments to the estimated fair values of the acquired assets (including core deposits presented in the table below) and liabilities as of the acquisition date related to the acquisition of the 1st United (see Note 2 for further details). There was no impairment of goodwill during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

The following table summarizes other intangible assets as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014:



	Gross Intangible Assets		Accumulated Amortization			Valuation Allowance			Net Intangible Assets
	(in thousands)
March 31, 2015
Loan servicing rights	$	73,096	$	(53,597	)	$	(676	)	$	18,823
Core deposits	43,384		(29,219		)	—			14,165
Other	4,374		(2,338		)	—			2,036
Total other intangible assets	$	120,854	$	(85,154	)	$	(676	)	$	35,024
December 31, 2014
Loan servicing rights	$	72,154	$	(51,708	)	$	(592	)	$	19,854
Core deposits	46,694		(29,916		)	—			16,778
Other	4,591		(2,448		)	—			2,143
Total other intangible assets	$	123,439	$	(84,072	)	$	(592	)	$	38,775

Loan servicing rights are accounted for using the amortization method. Under this method, Valley amortizes the loan servicing assets in proportion to, and over the period of estimated net servicing revenues. On a quarterly basis, Valley stratifies its loan servicing assets into groupings based on risk characteristics and assesses each group for impairment based on fair value. Impairment charges on loan servicing rights are recognized in earnings when the book value of a stratified group of loan servicing rights exceeds its estimated fair value. Valley recorded net impairment charges on its loan servicing rights totaling $84 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2015

as compared to net recoveries of impairment charges totaling $100 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2014.

Core deposits are amortized using an accelerated method and have a weighted average amortization period of 11 years. The line item labeled “Other” included in the table above primarily consists of customer lists and covenants not to compete, which are amortized over their expected lives generally using a straight-line method and have a weighted average amortization period of approximately 18 years. Valley evaluates core deposits and other intangibles for impairment when an indication of impairment exists. No impairment was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

The following presents the estimated future amortization expense of other intangible assets for the remainder of 2015 through 2019:



	Loan Servicing Rights		Core Deposits		Other
	(in thousands)
2015	$	4,070	$	2,446	$	325
2016	4,220		2,648		233
2017	3,298		2,120		220
2018	2,511		1,767		193
2019	1,838		1,497		181

Valley recognized amortization expense on other intangible assets, including net impairment charges and net recoveries of impairment charges on loan servicing rights, totaling approximately $2.4 million and $2.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Note 11. Stock–Based Compensation

Valley has one active employee equity plan, the 2009 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (as amended from time to time, the “Employee Stock Incentive Plan”), administered by the Compensation and Human Resources Committee (the “Committee”) appointed by Valley’s Board of Directors. The Committee can grant incentive awards to officers and key employees of Valley, whose substantial contributions are essential to the continued growth and success of Valley. As of March 31, 2015, 2.6 million shares of common stock were available for issuance under the Employee Stock Incentive Plan.

Under the Employee Stock Incentive Plan, Valley may award shares to its employees in the form of stock appreciation rights, incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units (RSUs). The essential features of each award are described in the award agreement relating to that award. The grant, exercise, vesting, settlement or payment of an award may be based upon the fair value of Valley’s common stock on the last sale price reported for Valley’s common stock on such date or the last sale price reported preceding such date, except for performance-based restricted stock and RSUs with a market condition. The grant date fair values of performance-based awards that vest based on a market condition are determined by a third party specialist using a Monte Carlo valuation model.

Valley awarded time-based restricted stock totaling 459 thousand shares and 423 thousand shares during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, to both executive officers and key employees of Valley. Valley also awarded 313 thousand shares of performance-based RSUs and 240 thousand of performance-based restricted stock during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, to certain executive officers. The RSUs earn dividend equivalents (equal to cash dividends paid on Valley's common share) over the applicable performance period. Dividend equivalents and accrued interest, per the terms of the agreements, are accumulated and paid to the grantee at the vesting date, or forfeited if the performance conditions are not met.

The performance-based awards vest based on (i) growth in tangible book value per share plus dividends (75 percent of performance shares) and (ii) total shareholder return as compared to our peer group (25 percent of performance shares). The majority of the performance-based awards "cliff" vest after three years based on the cumulative performance of Valley during that time period. The non-performance based awards have vesting periods ranging from three to six years. Generally, the restrictions on such awards lapse at an annual or bi-annual rate of one-third of the total award commencing with the first or second anniversary of the date of grant, respectively. The average grant date fair value of non-performance and performance-based restricted stock awarded during the three months ended March 31, 2015 was $9.15 and $8.98 per share, respectively.

Valley recorded stock-based compensation expense of $2.5 million and $2.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The fair values of stock awards are expensed over the shorter of the vesting

or required service period. As of March 31, 2015, the unrecognized amortization expense for all stock-based employee compensation totaled approximately $19.6 million and will be recognized over an average remaining vesting period of approximately 4 years.

Note 12. Guarantees

Guarantees that have been entered into by Valley include standby letters of credit of $190.4 million as of March 31, 2015. Standby letters of credit represent the guarantee by Valley of the obligations or performance of a customer in the event the customer is unable to meet or perform its obligations to a third party. Of the total standby letters of credit, $130.6 million, or 68.6 percent, are secured and, in the event of non-performance by the customer, Valley has rights to the underlying collateral, which includes commercial real estate, business assets (physical plant or property, inventory or receivables), marketable securities and cash in the form of bank savings accounts and certificates of deposit. As of March 31, 2015, Valley had a $623 thousand liability related to the standby letters of credit.

Note 13. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

Valley enters into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates.

Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk. Valley’s objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, Valley uses interest rate swaps and caps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the payment of either fixed or variable-rate amounts in exchange for the receipt of variable or fixed-rate amounts from a counterparty. Interest rate caps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty if interest rates rise above the strike rate on the contract in exchange for an up-front premium.

Fair Value Hedges of Fixed Rate Assets and Liabilities. Valley is exposed to changes in the fair value of certain of its fixed rate assets or liabilities due to changes in benchmark interest rates based on one-month LIBOR. From time to time, Valley uses interest rate swaps to manage its exposure to changes in fair value. Interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges involve the receipt of variable rate payments from a counterparty in exchange for Valley making fixed rate payments over the life of the agreements without the exchange of the underlying notional amount. For derivatives that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges, the gain or loss on the derivative as well as the loss or gain on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are recognized in earnings. Valley includes the gain or loss on the hedged items in the same income statement line item as the loss or gain on the related derivatives.

Non-designated Hedges. Derivatives not designated as hedges may be used to manage Valley’s exposure to interest rate movements or to provide service to customers but do not meet the requirements for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP. Derivatives not designated as hedges are not entered into for speculative purposes.

Under a program, Valley executes interest rate swaps with commercial lending customers to facilitate their respective risk management strategies. These interest rate swaps with customers are simultaneously offset by interest rate swaps that Valley executes with a third party, such that Valley minimizes its net risk exposure resulting from such transactions. As the interest rate swaps associated with this program do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements, changes in the fair value of both the customer swaps and the offsetting swaps are recognized directly in earnings.

Valley regularly enters into mortgage banking derivatives which are non-designated hedges. These derivatives include interest rate lock commitments provided to customers to fund certain residential mortgage loans to be sold into the secondary market and forward commitments for the future delivery of such loans. Valley enters into forward commitments for the future delivery of residential mortgage loans when interest rate lock commitments are

entered into in order to economically hedge the effect of future changes in interest rates on Valley’s commitments to fund the loans as well as on its portfolio of mortgage loans held for sale.

During the second quarter of 2014, Valley issued $25 million of market linked certificates of deposit through a broker dealer. The rate paid on these hybrid instruments is based on a formula derived from the spread between the long and short ends of the constant maturity swap (CMS) rate curve. This type of instrument is referred to as a "steepener" since it derives its value from the slope of the CMS curve. Valley has determined that these hybrid instruments contain an embedded swap contract which has been bifurcated from the host contract. Valley entered into a swap (with a total notional amount of $25 million) almost simultaneously with the deposit issuance where the receive rate on the swap mirrors the pay rate on the brokered deposits. The bifurcated derivative and the stand alone swap are both marked to market through other non-interest expense. Although these instruments do not meet the hedge accounting requirements, the change in fair value of both the bifurcated derivative and the stand alone swap tend to move in opposite directions with changes in 90 day LIBOR rate and therefore provide an effective economic hedge.

Amounts included in the consolidated statements of financial condition related to the fair value of Valley’s derivative financial instruments were as follows:



	March 31, 2015						December 31, 2014
	Fair Value						Fair Value
	Other Assets		Other Liabilities		Notional Amount		Other Assets		Other Liabilities		Notional Amount
	(in thousands)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Cash flow hedge interest rate caps and swaps	$	1,897	$	26,704	$	1,007,000	$	2,229	$	19,302	$	1,007,000
Fair value hedge interest rate swaps	8,999		1,536		133,358		6,257		1,482		133,406
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments	$	10,896	$	28,240	$	1,140,358	$	8,486	$	20,784	$	1,140,406
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate swaps and embedded derivatives	$	18,832	$	18,828	$	393,283	$	12,464	$	12,455	$	378,849
Mortgage banking derivatives	42		52		21,069		37		91		40,857
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments	$	18,874	$	18,880	$	414,352	$	12,501	$	12,546	$	419,706

Losses included in the consolidated statements of income and in other comprehensive income, on a pre-tax basis, related to interest rate derivatives designated as hedges of cash flows were as follows:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015			2014
	(in thousands)
Amount of loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss to interest expense	$	(1,629	)	$	(1,648	)
Amount of loss recognized in other comprehensive income	(8,911		)	(6,298		)

The net gains or losses related to cash flow hedge ineffectiveness were immaterial during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014. The accumulated net after-tax losses related to effective cash flow hedges included in accumulated other comprehensive loss were $18.8 million and $14.5 million at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to cash flow interest rate derivatives are reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the hedged variable interest rate liabilities. Valley estimates that $8.4 million will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense over the next twelve months.

Gains (losses) included in the consolidated statements of income related to interest rate derivatives designated as hedges of fair value were as follows:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015			2014
	(in thousands)
Derivative - interest rate swaps:
Interest income	$	(54	)	$	(23	)
Interest expense	2,741			(3,175		)
Hedged item - loans, deposits and long-term borrowings:
Interest income	$	54		$	23
Interest expense	(2,781		)	3,144

During the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, the amounts recognized in non-interest expense related to ineffectiveness of fair value hedges were immaterial. Valley recognized a net reduction to interest expense of $100 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2014 related to Valley’s fair value hedges on brokered time deposits, which include net settlements on the derivatives. The fair value hedges on brokered time deposits expired in March 2014.

The net gains (losses) included in the consolidated statements of income related to derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments were as follows:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015		2014
	(in thousands)
Non-designated hedge interest rate derivatives
Other non-interest expense	$	38	$	(173	)

Credit Risk Related Contingent Features. By using derivatives, Valley is exposed to credit risk if counterparties to the derivative contracts do not perform as expected. Management attempts to minimize counterparty credit risk through credit approvals, limits, monitoring procedures and obtaining collateral where appropriate. Credit risk exposure associated with derivative contracts is managed at Valley in conjunction with Valley’s consolidated counterparty risk management process. Valley’s counterparties and the risk limits monitored by management are periodically reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors.

Valley has agreements with its derivative counterparties providing that if Valley defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then Valley could also be declared in default on its derivative counterparty agreements. Additionally, Valley has an agreement with several of its derivative counterparties that contains provisions that require Valley’s debt to maintain an investment grade credit rating from each of the major credit rating agencies, from which it receives a credit rating. If Valley’s credit rating is reduced below investment grade or such rating is withdrawn or suspended, then the counterparty could terminate the derivative positions, and Valley would be required to settle its obligations under the agreements. As of March 31, 2015, Valley was in compliance with all of the provisions of its derivative counterparty agreements. As of March 31, 2015, the fair value of derivatives in a net liability position, which includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk related to these agreements was $13.3 million. Valley has derivative counterparty agreements that require minimum collateral posting thresholds for certain counterparties. At March 31, 2015, Valley had $40.7 million in collateral posted with its counterparties.

Note 14. Balance Sheet Offsetting

Certain financial instruments, including derivatives (consisting of interest rate caps and swaps) and repurchase agreements (accounted for as secured long-term borrowings), may be eligible for offset in the consolidated balance sheet and/or subject to master netting arrangements or similar agreements. Valley is party to master netting arrangements with its financial institution counterparties; however, Valley does not offset assets and liabilities under these arrangements for financial statement presentation purposes. The master netting arrangements provide for a single net settlement of all swap agreements, as well as collateral, in the event of default on, or termination of, any one contract. Collateral, usually in the form of cash or marketable investment securities, is posted by the counterparty with net liability positions in accordance with contract thresholds. Master repurchase agreements which include “right of set-off” provisions generally have a legally enforceable right to offset recognized amounts. In such cases, the collateral would be used to settle the fair value of the repurchase agreement should Valley be in default. The table below presents information about Valley’s financial instruments that are eligible for offset in the consolidated statements of financial condition as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.



							Gross Amounts Not Offset
	Gross Amounts Recognized		Gross Amounts Offset		Net Amounts Presented		Financial Instruments			Cash Collateral				Net Amount
	(in thousands)
March 31, 2015
Assets:
Interest rate caps and swaps	$	29,728	$	—	$	29,728	$	(10,859	)	$	—			$	18,869
Liabilities:
Interest rate caps and swaps	$	47,068	$	—	$	47,068	$	(10,859	)	$	(36,209	)		$	—
Repurchase agreements	395,000		—		395,000		—			(395,000		)	*	—
Total	$	442,068	$	—	$	442,068	$	(10,859	)	$	(431,209	)		$	—
December 31, 2014
Assets:
Interest rate caps and swaps	$	20,950	$	—	$	20,950	$	(8,504	)	$	—			$	12,446
Liabilities:
Interest rate caps and swaps	$	33,239	$	—	$	33,239	$	(8,504	)	$	(24,735	)		$	—
Repurchase agreements	395,000		—		395,000		—			(395,000		)	*	—
Total	$	428,239	$	—	$	428,239	$	(8,504	)	$	(419,735	)		$	—



*	Represents fair value of non-cash pledged investment securities.

Note 15. Tax Credit Investments

Valley’s tax credit investments are primarily related to investments promoting qualified affordable housing projects, and other investments related to community development and renewable energy sources. Some of these tax-advantaged investments support Valley’s regulatory compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act. Valley’s investments in these entities generate a return primarily through the realization of federal income tax credits, and other tax benefits, such as tax deductions from operating losses of the investments, over specified time periods. These tax credits and deductions are recognized as a reduction of income tax expense.

Valley’s tax credit investments are carried in other assets on the consolidated statements of financial condition. Valley’s unfunded capital and other commitments related to the tax credit investments are carried in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the consolidated statements of financial condition. Valley recognizes amortization of tax credit investments, including impairment losses, within non-interest expense of the consolidated statements

of income using the equity method of accounting. An impairment loss is recognized when the fair value of the tax credit investment is less than its carrying value.

The following table presents the balances of Valley’s affordable housing tax credit investments, other tax credit investments, and related unfunded commitments at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014:



	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
	(in thousands)
Other Assets:
Affordable housing tax credit investments, net	$	34,843	$	36,009
Other tax credit investments, net	62,693		66,023
Total tax credit investments, net	$	97,536	$	102,032
Other Liabilities:
Unfunded affordable housing tax credit commitments	$	8,080	$	8,800
Unfunded other tax credit commitments	418		418
Total unfunded tax credit commitments	$	8,498	$	9,218

The following table presents other information relating to Valley’s affordable housing tax credit investments and other tax credit investments for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015		2014
	(in thousands)
Components of Income Tax Expense:
Affordable housing tax credits and other tax benefits	$	1,731	$	1,393
Other tax credit investment credits and tax benefits	3,618		3,188
Total reduction in income tax expense	$	5,349	$	4,581
Amortization of Tax Credit Investments:
Affordable housing tax credit investment losses	$	677	$	440
Affordable housing tax credit investment impairment losses	488		—
Other tax credit investment losses	297		398
Other tax credit investment impairment losses	3,034		2,878
Total amortization of tax credit investments recorded in non-interest expense	$	4,496	$	3,716

Note 16. Business Segments

The information under the caption “Business Segments” in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of the Financial Condition and Results of Operations is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following MD&A should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report. The words "Valley," the "Company," "we," "our" and "us" refer to Valley National Bancorp and its wholly owned subsidiaries, unless we indicate otherwise. Additionally, Valley’s principal subsidiary, Valley National Bank, is commonly referred to as the “Bank” in this MD&A.

The MD&A contains supplemental financial information, described in the sections that follow, which has been determined by methods other than U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) that management uses in its analysis of our performance. Management believes these non-GAAP financial measures provide information useful to investors in understanding our underlying operational performance, our business and performance trends and facilitates comparisons with the performance of others in the financial services industry. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for or superior to financial measures calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures may also be calculated differently from similar measures disclosed by other companies.

Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, both in the MD&A and elsewhere, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are not historical facts and include expressions about management’s confidence and strategies and management’s expectations about new and existing programs and products, acquisitions, relationships, opportunities, taxation, technology, market conditions and economic expectations. These statements may be identified by such forward-looking terminology as “should,” “expect,” “believe,” “view,” “opportunity,” “allow,” “continues,” “reflects,” “typically,” “usually,” “anticipate,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Such forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties and our actual results may differ materially from such forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements in addition to those risk factors disclosed in Valley’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, include, but are not limited to:


•	a severe decline in the general economic conditions of New Jersey, the New York Metropolitan area and Florida;


•	unexpected changes in market interest rates for interest earning assets and/or interest bearing liabilities;


•	less than expected cost savings from long-term borrowings that mature from 2015 to 2018;


•	government intervention in the U.S. financial system and the effects of and changes in trade and monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including the interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve;


•	claims and litigation pertaining to fiduciary responsibility, contractual issues, environmental laws and other matters;


•	our inability to pay dividends at current levels, or at all, because of inadequate future earnings, regulatory restrictions or limitations, and changes in the composition of qualifying regulatory capital and minimum capital requirements (including those resulting from the U.S. implementation of Basel III requirements);


•	higher than expected loan losses within one or more segments of our loan portfolio;


•	declines in value in our investment portfolio, including additional other-than-temporary impairment charges on our investment securities;


•	unexpected significant declines in the loan portfolio due to the lack of economic expansion, increased competition, large prepayments or other factors;


•	unanticipated credit deterioration in our loan portfolio;


•	unanticipated loan delinquencies, loss of collateral, decreased service revenues, and other potential negative effects on our business caused by severe weather or other external events;


•	higher than expected tax rates, including increases resulting from changes in tax laws, regulations and case law;


•	an unexpected decline in real estate values within our market areas;


•	higher than expected FDIC insurance assessments;


•	the failure of other financial institutions with whom we have trading, clearing, counterparty and other financial relationships;


•	lack of liquidity to fund our various cash obligations;


•	unanticipated reduction in our deposit base;


•	potential acquisitions that may disrupt our business;


•	legislative and regulatory actions (including the impact of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and related regulations) subject us to additional regulatory oversight which may result in higher compliance costs and/or require us to change our business model;


•	changes in accounting policies or accounting standards;


•	our inability to promptly adapt to technological changes;


•	our internal controls and procedures may not be adequate to prevent losses;


•	the inability to realize expected revenue synergies from the 1st United Bancorp, Inc. (1st United) merger in the amounts or in the timeframe anticipated;


•	inability to retain customers and employees, including those of 1st United;


•	lower than expected cash flows from purchased credit-impaired loans;


•	cyber attacks, computer viruses or other malware that may breach the security of our websites or other systems to obtain unauthorized access to confidential information, destroy data, disable or degrade service, or sabotage our systems;


•	future goodwill impairment due to changes in our business, changes in market conditions, or other factors; and


•	other unexpected material adverse changes in our operations or earnings.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Valley’s accounting policies are fundamental to understanding management’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations. Our significant accounting policies are presented in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in Valley’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. We identified our policies on the allowance for loan losses, security valuations and impairments, goodwill and other intangible assets, and income taxes to be critical because management has to make subjective and/or complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because it is likely that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. Management has reviewed the application of these policies with the Audit Committee of Valley’s Board of Directors. Our critical accounting policies are described in detail in Part II, Item 7 in Valley’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

New Authoritative Accounting Guidance

See Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of new authoritative accounting guidance including the respective dates of adoption and effects on results of operations and financial condition.

Executive Summary

Company Overview. At March 31, 2015, Valley had consolidated total assets of approximately $19.0 billion, total net loans of $13.6 billion, total deposits of $14.2 billion and total shareholders’ equity of $1.9 billion. Our commercial bank operations include branch office locations in northern and central New Jersey and the New York City Boroughs of Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, and Long Island and southeast and central Florida. Of our current 224 branch network, 72 percent, 19 percent and 9 percent of the branches are located in New Jersey, New York and Florida, respectively. We have grown both in asset size and locations significantly over the past several years primarily through bank acquisitions, and, to a much lesser extent, de novo branch expansion. Our most recent acquisition of 1st United during November 2014 provided Valley unique access to Florida's high growth market through its experienced management team and a 20 branch network covering some of the most attractive urban banking markets in Florida.

See Item 1 of Valley’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 for more details regarding our acquisition of 1st United and other past merger activity.

Quarterly Results. Net income for the first quarter of 2015 was $30.3 million, or $0.13 per diluted common share, compared to $33.8 million, or $0.17 per diluted common share, for the first quarter of 2014. The $3.5 million decrease in quarterly net income as compared to the same quarter one year ago was largely due to: (i) a $12.0 million increase in non-interest expense mostly due to higher salary and employee benefit expense and net occupancy and equipment expense related to the November 2014 acquisition of 1st United, (ii) an $11.5 million increase in income tax expense related to higher pre-tax income and a $8.3 million reduction in our reserve for unrecognized tax benefits during the first quarter of 2014 and (iii) a $2.1 million decrease in non-interest income, partially offset by (iv) a $18.1 million increase in our net interest income mostly due to higher average loan balances (due to both acquired loans and organic growth) and the prepayment of $275 million of high cost long-term borrowings in the fourth quarter of 2014 and (v) a decrease of $4.0 million in the provision for credit losses largely caused by positive trends in our credit quality metrics and the economy over the last 12-month period. See the "Net Interest Income," "Non-Interest Income," "Non-Interest Expense," and "Income Tax Expense" sections below for more details on the items above impacting our first quarter 2015 results, as well as other items discussed elsewhere in this MD&A.

Economic Overview and Indicators. During the first quarter of 2015, real gross domestic product (GDP) grew at a 1.0 percent annual rate after advancing 2.2 percent in the fourth quarter of 2014. The housing market and real personal consumption expenditures decelerated compared to the fourth quarter of 2014. However, business fixed investment expanded at a modest pace during the first quarter as compared to the linked fourth quarter.

The labor market continued to improve as job growth remained strong and signs of wage pressure grew. The civilian unemployment rate ended the quarter at 5.5 percent. However, there are some indicators that suggest an underutilization of labor resources in particular the U6 level of unemployment which includes all persons marginally attached to the labor force plus total persons employed part time for economic reasons.

The pace of U.S. existing home sales decelerated compared to the fourth quarter of 2014. However, home sales are expected to moderately rise during in the second quarter of 2015 as market conditions remain favorable and signs that first time homebuyers are returning to the market.

Consumer spending decelerated in the first quarter of 2015. Retail sales including motor vehicle sales declined in January and February as unusually severe weather in the Midwest and Northeast regions may have accounted for the slowing in consumer spending. Spending activity should find momentum in the coming months as real disposable income remains bolstered by low energy prices. Equity and home prices advanced further during the first quarter which should also support consumer spending in further periods.

At the Federal Reserve’s Open Market Committee (the “Committee”) meeting in March 2015, the members maintained a target range of zero to 0.25 percent for its federal funds rate. In determining how long to maintain current policy, the Committee will assess progress (both realized and expected) toward its objectives of maximum employment and two percent inflation. The Committee continued its existing policy of reinvesting principal

payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities and will continue rolling over maturing Treasury securities at auction. This policy should help maintain accommodative financial conditions. The Committee has continued to emphasize that any change in monetary policy will be data dependent.

The 10-year U.S. Treasury note yield ended the first quarter at 1.94 percent, 23 basis points lower compared with December 31, 2014. The spread between the 2- and 10-year U.S. Treasury note yields ended the first quarter of 2015 at 1.38 percentage points, 12 basis points lower sequentially and 90 basis points lower than compared to the first quarter of 2014.

During the fourth quarter of 2014 and first quarter of 2015, market interest rates for residential mortgages declined to levels not seen since June 2013. The decline has positively impacted the volume of Valley's mortgage origination activity over the past six months. However, the new and refinanced mortgage loan activity has been modest as compared to the record setting levels of activity that Valley experienced during most of the 12-month period ending June 30, 2013, and we do not expect the originations to return to such levels. During the first quarter of 2015, we experienced stronger demand for commercial and industrial loans, as well as continued solid demand for commercial real estate loans, especially within the New York markets. Despite the tepid wage and GDP growth, some commercial customers are expanding their operations. However, the continued pressure on long-term interest rates coupled with the potential increase in short-term interest rates and other negative developments in the global economy will likely provide a difficult operating environment during the remainder of 2015 and may challenge our business operations and results, as highlighted throughout the remaining MD&A discussion below.

The following economic indicators are just a few of the many factors that may be used to assess the market conditions in our primary markets of northern and central New Jersey, the New York City metropolitan area, and Florida.



	For the Month Ended
Selected Economic Indicators:	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014		September 30, 2014		June 30, 2014		March 30, 2014

Unemployment rate:
U.S.	5.50	%	5.60	%	5.90	%	6.10	%	6.70	%
New York Metro Region*	6.50	%	5.60	%	6.30	%	6.70	%	7.40	%
New Jersey	6.50	%	6.20	%	6.50	%	6.60	%	7.20	%
New York	5.70	%	5.20	%	5.20	%	6.60	%	6.90	%
Florida	5.70	%	5.60	%	6.10	%	6.20	%	6.30	%
Miami-Fort Lauderdale Metro Region	5.30	%	5.60	%	6.60	%	6.40	%	6.50	%



	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014			September 30, 2014			June 30, 2014			March 30, 2014
	($ in millions)
Personal income:
New Jersey	NA		$	514,301		$	509,563		$	507,339		$	500,870
New York	NA		$	1,125,667		$	1,116,714		$	1,109,298		$	1,097,279
Florida	NA		$	862,595		$	853,465		$	847,539		$	833,230
New consumer bankruptcies:
New Jersey	NA		0.11		%	0.11		%	0.13		%	0.10		%
New York	NA		0.06		%	0.06		%	0.08		%	0.06		%
Florida	NA		0.11		%	0.11		%	0.13		%	0.11		%
Change in home prices:
U.S.	0.10	%	(0.10		)%	(0.10		)%	0.90		%	0.20		%
New York Metro Region*	1.82	%	0.25		%	(0.31		)%	(0.01		)%	1.51		%
Florida	1.78	%	2.38		%	0.48		%	2.24		%	3.30		%
New consumer foreclosures:
New Jersey	NA		0.07		%	0.07		%	0.07		%	0.09		%
New York	NA		0.04		%	0.03		%	0.04		%	0.06		%
Florida	NA		0.07		%	0.07		%	0.07		%	0.09		%
Homeowner vacancy rates:
New Jersey	1.08	%	1.60		%	1.40		%	1.70		%	1.70		%
New York	2.20	%	2.20		%	1.70		%	1.40		%	1.50		%
Florida	2.20	%	2.80		%	2.30		%	2.40		%	2.50		%

NA - not available



*	As reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the NY-NJ-PA Metropolitan Statistical Area.

Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, S&P Indices, and the U.S. Census Bureau.

Loans. Total non-covered loans (i.e., loans which are not subject to our loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC) increased by $288.7 million, or 8.7 percent on an annualized basis, to $13.6 billion at March 31, 2015 from December 31, 2014 largely due to solid growth in all loan categories, except for home equity loans. Higher volumes within commercial and industrial loans, commercial real estate (including construction) loans and residential mortgage loans accounted for the majority of the first quarter growth, as total outstanding balances in these categories increased by $124.7 million, $73.8 million and $70.1 million, or 22.3 percent, 4.5 percent, and 11.1 percent on an annualized basis, respectively. The commercial and industrial loan growth resulted from a significant uptick in new and existing customer demand primarily in our New York markets. The continued growth within the commercial real estate portfolio was supplemented by a bulk loan participation purchase of a small number of multi-family loans (mostly in New York City) totaling $97.1 million. A portion of the purchased loans is expected to qualify as part of Valley's continuous effort to meet the credit needs of certain borrowers under Community Reinvestment Act (CRA). The $70.1 million increase in residential mortgage loans was also supplemented by two bulk loan purchases from third party originators totaling $42.8 million during the first quarter of 2015. Organic residential loan originations and our retention of such loans both moderately increased during the first quarter. Total covered loans (i.e., loans subject to our loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC) decreased to $183.7 million, or 1.3 percent of our total loans, at March 31, 2015 as compared to $211.9 million, or 1.6 percent, at December 31, 2014 mainly due to normal collection and prepayment activity.

See further details on our loan activities, including the covered loan portfolio, under the “Loan Portfolio” section below.

Asset Quality. Given the current state of the national and local economy, labor markets, and the average level of delinquency rates reported by the banking industry, we believe our loan portfolio’s credit performance remained at an acceptable level at March 31, 2015. Our past due loans and non-accrual loans, discussed further below, exclude PCI loans. Under U.S. GAAP, the PCI loans (acquired at a discount that is due, in part, to credit quality) are accounted for on a pool basis and are not subject to delinquency classification in the same manner as loans originated by Valley. All of the loans acquired from 1st United in the fourth quarter of 2014 are accounted for as PCI loans.

Total non-PCI loan portfolio delinquencies (including loans past due 30 days or more and non-accrual loans) as a percentage of total loans increased to 0.71 percent at March 31, 2015 compared to 0.65 percent at December 31, 2014 largely due to an increase in loans past due 30 to 59 days. Of the 0.71 percent in delinquencies at March 31, 2015, 0.05 percent, or $7.5 million, represented performing matured loans in the normal process of renewal. Non-accrual loans moderately increased to $57.5 million, or 0.42 percent of our entire loan portfolio of $13.7 billion, at March 31, 2015 as compared to $55.8 million, or 0.41 percent of total loans, at December 31, 2014. Overall, our non-performing assets decreased by 11.9 percent to $73.2 million at March 31, 2015 as compared to $83.1 million at December 31, 2014 partly due to the sale of a $7.1 million non-performing loan held for sale during the first quarter of 2015.

Our lending strategy is based on underwriting standards designed to maintain high credit quality and we remain optimistic regarding the overall future performance of our loan portfolio. However, due to the potential for future credit deterioration caused by the unpredictable future strength of the U.S. economy and the housing and labor markets, management cannot provide assurance that our non-performing assets will remain at, or decline from, the levels reported as of March 31, 2015. See the "Non-Performing Assets" section below for further analysis of our asset quality.

Deposits and Other Borrowings. The mix of the deposit categories of total average deposits for the first quarter of 2015 remained relatively unchanged as compared to the fourth quarter of 2014. Non-interest bearing deposits represented approximately 30 percent of total average deposits for the three months ended March 31, 2015, while savings, NOW and money market accounts were 51 percent and time deposits were 19 percent. Overall, average deposits totaling $14.1 billion for the first quarter of 2015 increased by $721.6 million as compared to the fourth quarter of 2014 due, in large part, to a full quarter of the assumed deposit balances totaling approximately $1.4 billion from the 1st United acquisition on November 1, 2014, as well as increased organic retail volumes across several deposit categories.

Average short-term borrowings decreased $41.3 million, or 24.3 percent to $128.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2014 due to a $21.4 million decline in average overnight federal funds purchased to short-term changes in our liquidity position and a $19.9 million decline in average securities sold under agreements to repurchase ("repos"). All of our short-term repos represent customer deposit balances being swept into this vehicle overnight.

Average long-term borrowings (which include junior subordinated debentures issued to capital trusts which are presented separately on the consolidated statements of condition) totaled approximately $2.6 billion and $2.8 billion for the first quarter of 2015 and fourth quarter of 2014, respectively. The decrease in average long-term borrowings as compared to the fourth quarter of 2014 was mostly due to the prepayment of $275 million in borrowings (which had a combined weighted average interest rate of 4.52 percent) during late December 2014. At March 31, 2015, our long-term borrowings totaling $2.5 billion included approximately $1.7 billion of relatively high cost borrowings (mostly from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York) that begin to mature in the third quarter of 2015 through the end of 2018. These maturities with an average cost of 3.89 percent are likely to substantially decrease the level of our funding costs over such periods and beyond, dependent on the level of market interest rates and our ability to obtain similar types and amounts of debt instruments.

Selected Performance Indicators. The following table presents our annualized performance ratios for the periods indicated:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015		2014
Return on average assets	0.64	%	0.84	%
Return on average shareholders’ equity	6.49		8.76
Return on average tangible shareholders’ equity (ROATE)	9.66		12.52

ROATE, which is a non-GAAP measure, is computed by dividing net income by average shareholders’ equity less average goodwill and average other intangible assets, as follows:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015			2014
	($ in thousands)
Net income	$	30,341		$	33,835
Average shareholders’ equity	1,869,754			1,544,640
Less: Average goodwill and other intangible assets	(613,556		)	(463,266		)
Average tangible shareholders’ equity	$	1,256,198		$	1,081,374
Annualized ROATE	9.66		%	12.52		%

Management believes the ROATE measure provides information useful to management and investors in understanding our underlying operational performance, our business and performance trends and the measure facilitates comparisons with the performance of others in the financial services industry. This non-GAAP financial measure should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for or superior to financial measures calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures may also be calculated differently from similar measures disclosed by other companies.

All of the above ratios are, from time to time, impacted by net gains and losses on securities transactions, net gains on sales of loans and net impairment losses on securities recognized in non-interest income. These amounts can vary widely from period to period due to, among other factors, the level of sales of our investment securities classified as available for sale, the amount of residential mortgage loans originated for sale, and the results of our quarterly impairment analysis of the held to maturity and available for sale investment portfolios. See the “Non-Interest Income” section below for more details.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income on a tax equivalent basis totaling $134.0 million for the first quarter of 2015 increased $3.4 million and $18.0 million as compared to the fourth quarter of 2014 and first quarter of 2014, respectively. Interest income on a tax equivalent basis was $172.9 million for the first quarter of 2015 and remained relatively unchanged as compared to the fourth quarter of 2014 as a $526.7 million increase in average loans (partially caused by a full quarter of the $1.2 billion of loans acquired from 1st United in November 2014) coupled with loan growth was mostly offset by a 17 basis point decline in the yield on average loans. Interest expense decreased $3.4 million to $38.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015. The decrease in interest expense from the fourth quarter of 2014 was primarily driven by the prepayment of $275 million in long-term borrowings, which had a combined weighted average interest rate of 4.52 percent, in late December 2014 and two less days during the first quarter of 2015. The decrease in interest expense on average long-term borrowings was partially offset by additional interest expense resulting from a $241.5 million increase in average time deposits. The increase in average time deposits resulted, in part, from a full quarter of deposits assumed from the 1st United acquisition.

Average interest earning assets increased to $16.7 billion for the first quarter of 2015 as compared to approximately $14.5 billion for the first quarter of 2014 largely due to the acquired loans and investments totaling $1.2 billion and $224.0 million, respectively, in the acquisition of 1st United on November 1, 2014. Strong organic loan growth over the last 12 month period primarily in commercial real estate loans, automobile loans and secured personal lines of credit, supplemented by a few bulk loan purchases from third party originators, also contributed to the increase in average interest earning assets as compared to the first quarter of 2014. Compared to the fourth quarter of 2014, average interest earning assets increased by $423.9 million from $16.3 billion largely due to the aforementioned 1st United acquisition, as well as strong origination volumes in most loan categories during the first quarter of 2015, including a solid uptick in commercial and industrial loan activity. Additionally, Valley made bulk loan purchases of commercial real estate loan participations and residential mortgage loans totaling $97.1 million and $42.8 million, respectively, from third party originators during the first quarter of 2015. As a result of the acquisition and the growth in loans, average loans increased $526.7 million, while our excess liquidity in the form of average federal funds sold and other interest bearing deposits (mostly held in overnight interest bearing deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York) decreased $101.7 million from the fourth quarter of 2014.

Average interest bearing liabilities increased $1.8 billion to $12.6 billion for the first quarter of 2015 as compared to the first quarter of 2014 mainly due to assumed deposits and short-term borrowings totaling $1.4 billion and $16.8 million, respectively, in the acquisition of 1st United during the fourth quarter of 2014, retail time deposit campaigns in the fourth quarter of 2014, and a substantial increase in our use of brokered money market accounts as a low cost funding source for loan growth and other liquidity needs since the second quarter of 2014. Compared to the fourth quarter of 2014, average interest bearing liabilities increased $278.9 million in the first quarter of 2015 mostly due to the aforementioned interest bearing liabilities assumed in 1st United acquisition and general increases in retail deposit volumes, partially offset by a decrease in average long-term borrowings caused by our prepayment of $275 million in high cost borrowing in late December 2014.

The net interest margin on a tax equivalent basis of 3.20 percent for the first quarter of 2015 was unchanged as compared to linked fourth quarter of 2014, and decreased by 1 basis point from 3.21 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2014. The yield on average interest earning assets decreased by 11 basis points on a linked quarter basis. The lower yield was mainly a result of the aforementioned decrease in the yield on average loans largely caused by new and refinanced loan volumes at current interest rates that remain relatively low compared to the overall yield of our loan portfolio combined with a moderate decline in the accretion related to certain PCI loan pools. The level of yields on new loans was negatively impacted by the low market interest rates caused not only from the Fed's current monetary policy, but also from intense competition in our markets for quality commercial customers. Additionally, our higher yielding PCI loan portfolio declined $72.6 million, or 4.2 percent, from December 31, 2014 to approximately $1.6 billion at March 31, 2015 due to normal repayment and prepayment activity. During the first quarter, our yield on total average investment securities also moderately declined primarily due to two less days during the period as compared to the fourth quarter of 2014. The overall cost of average interest bearing liabilities decreased by 13 basis points from 1.37 percent in the linked fourth quarter of 2014 primarily due to a 15 basis point decline in the cost of average long-term

borrowing and two less days during the first quarter. Our cost of total deposits was 0.40 percent for the first quarter of 2015 compared to 0.41 percent for the three months ended December 31, 2014.

We continuously manage our balance sheet and explore ways to reduce our expenses to optimize our returns. Potential future loan growth from solid loan demand in our primary markets (that has continued into the early stages of the second quarter of 2015) is anticipated to positively impact our future net interest income. However, our margin continues to face the risk of compression in the future due to, among other factors, the relatively low level of interest rates on most interest earning asset alternatives, further repayment of higher yielding interest earning assets, the re-pricing risk related to our interest earning assets with short durations if long-term market interest rates were to decline below current levels, and the negative impact on interest expense from certain cash flow hedge derivative transactions related to money market deposit accounts. Additionally, a large portion of our cost of average borrowings remains tied to fixed rate long-term FHLB advances and repos (as well as $100 million in subordinated debt maturing in July 2015) with contractual interest rates significantly above current market rates for similar borrowings. There are no meaningful maturities of these borrowings until the third quarter of 2015 and, until then, we expect these borrowings to negatively impact our net interest margin. However, we entered into several forward starting interest rate swap derivative transactions during 2013 to hedge the risk of an increase in current market interest rates before the maturity of such borrowings. See Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on our derivative hedging transactions.

The following table reflects the components of net interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014 and March 31, 2014:

Quarterly Analysis of Average Assets, Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity and

Net Interest Income on a Tax Equivalent Basis



	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2015								December 31, 2014								March 31, 2014
	Average Balance			Interest			Average Rate		Average Balance			Interest			Average Rate		Average Balance			Interest			Average Rate
	($ in thousands)
Assets
Interest earning assets:
Loans (1)(2)	$	13,569,031		$	150,488		4.44	%	$	13,042,303		$	150,302		4.61	%	$	11,617,597		$	131,086		4.51	%
Taxable investments (3)	2,285,155			16,671			2.92		2,284,183			16,729			2.93		2,218,851			18,246			3.29
Tax-exempt investments (1)(3)	540,838			5,557			4.11		543,005			5,616			4.14		568,960			5,671			3.99
Federal funds sold and other interest bearing deposits	343,875			220			0.26		445,525			267			0.24		60,214			27			0.18
Total interest earning assets	16,738,899			172,936			4.13		16,315,016			172,914			4.24		14,465,622			155,030			4.29
Allowance for loan losses	(104,381		)						(107,012		)						(115,184		)
Cash and due from banks	435,276								452,006								274,652
Other assets	1,783,224								1,661,329								1,616,221
Unrealized losses on securities available for sale, net	(2,993		)						(13,340		)						(39,152		)
Total assets	$	18,850,025							$	18,307,999							$	16,202,159
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Interest bearing liabilities:
Savings, NOW and money market deposits	$	7,143,643		$	5,995		0.34	%	$	6,799,900		$	6,000		0.35	%	$	5,459,913		$	4,281		0.31	%
Time deposits	2,757,077			7,974			1.16		2,515,621			7,686			1.22		2,162,365			6,532			1.21
Total interest bearing deposits	9,900,720			13,969			0.56		9,315,521			13,686			0.59		7,622,278			10,813			0.57
Short-term borrowings	128,085			94			0.29		169,396			132			0.31		380,057			318			0.33
Long-term borrowings (4)	2,569,864			24,836			3.87		2,834,865			28,478			4.02		2,836,263			27,883			3.93
Total interest bearing liabilities	12,598,669			38,899			1.24		12,319,782			42,296			1.37		10,838,598			39,014			1.44
Non-interest bearing deposits	4,209,827								4,073,390								3,622,220
Other liabilities	171,775								134,493								196,701
Shareholders’ equity	1,869,754								1,780,334								1,544,640
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	18,850,025							$	18,307,999							$	16,202,159
Net interest income/interest rate spread (5)				$	134,037		2.89	%				$	130,618		2.87	%				$	116,016		2.85	%
Tax equivalent adjustment				(1,951		)						(1,972		)						(1,992		)
Net interest income, as reported				$	132,086							$	128,646							$	114,024
Net interest margin (6)							3.16	%							3.15	%							3.15	%
Tax equivalent effect							0.04	%							0.05	%							0.06	%
Net interest margin on a fully tax equivalent basis (6)							3.20	%							3.20	%							3.21	%


(1)	Interest income is presented on a tax equivalent basis using a 35 percent federal tax rate.


(2)	Loans are stated net of unearned income and include non-accrual loans.


(3)	The yield for securities that are classified as available for sale is based on the average historical amortized cost.


(4)	Includes junior subordinated debentures issued to capital trusts which are presented separately on the consolidated

statements of financial condition.


(5)	Interest rate spread represents the difference between the average yield on interest earning assets and the average cost of interest bearing liabilities and is presented on a fully tax equivalent basis.


(6)	Net interest income as a percentage of total average interest earning assets.

The following table demonstrates the relative impact on net interest income of changes in the volume of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities and changes in rates earned and paid by us on such assets and liabilities. Variances resulting from a combination of changes in volume and rates are allocated to the categories in proportion to the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each category.

Change in Net Interest Income on a Tax Equivalent Basis



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2015 Compared with March 31, 2014
	Change Due to Volume			Change Due to Rate			Total Change
	(in thousands)
Interest Income:
Loans*	$	21,677		$	(2,275	)	$	19,402
Taxable investments	532			(2,107		)	(1,575		)
Tax-exempt investments*	(286		)	172			(114		)
Federal funds sold and other interest bearing deposits	177			16			193
Total increase (decrease) in interest income	22,100			(4,194		)	17,906
Interest Expense:
Savings, NOW and money market deposits	1,396			318			1,714
Time deposits	1,730			(288		)	1,442
Short-term borrowings	(189		)	(35		)	(224		)
Long-term borrowings and junior subordinated debentures	(2,581		)	(466		)	(3,047		)
Total increase (decrease) in interest expense	356			(471		)	(115		)
Total increase (decrease) in net interest income	$	21,744		$	(3,723	)	$	18,021


*	Interest income is presented on a tax equivalent basis using a 35 percent tax rate.

Non-Interest Income

The following table presents the components of non-interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015			2014
	(in thousands)
Trust and investment services	$	2,494		$	2,442
Insurance commissions	4,205			4,498
Service charges on deposit accounts	5,290			5,751
Gains (losses) on securities transactions, net	2,416			(8		)
Fees from loan servicing	1,603			1,670
Gains on sales of loans, net	598			913
Gains (losses) on sales of assets, net	281			(148		)
Bank owned life insurance	1,764			1,408
Change in FDIC loss-share receivable	(3,920		)	(76		)
Other	3,914			4,288
Total non-interest income	$	18,645		$	20,738

Service charges on deposit accounts decreased $461 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2015 as compared to the same quarter in 2014 mostly due to general decreases in service charges on checking accounts, ATM fees and overdraft fees. Generally, the decline in these fees largely relates to better account management by our customers and as well as certain limitations imposed on our customer account-based fees driven by bank regulators.

Net gains on securities transactions increased $2.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 as compared with the first quarter 2014 mostly due to the sale of corporate debt securities and trust preferred securities with a total unamortized cost of approximately $34.2 million, including one corporate debt security classified as held to maturity with amortized cost of $9.8 million. The sales of these securities were primarily due to a one-time investment portfolio re-balancing during the first quarter due to changes in our regulatory capital calculation under the new Basel III regulatory capital reform (effective for Valley on January 1, 2015). Under ASC Topic 320, “Investments - Debt and Equity Securities,” the one-time sale of held to maturity securities based upon the change in capital requirements is permitted without tainting the remaining held to maturity investment portfolio.

Our net gains on sales of loans for each period are comprised of both gains on sales of residential mortgages and the net change in the mark to market gains and losses on our loans held for sale carried at fair value at each period end.

The net change in the fair value of loans held for sale for three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 did not have a material impact on the net losses and gains on sale of loans during these periods. Due to the current level of market interest rates and level of consumer demand, we do not expect a material change in our gains on the sales of residential mortgage loans originated for sale during the second quarter of 2015 as compared to the first quarter of 2015. Our decision to either sell or retain our mortgage loan production is dependent upon, among other factors, the levels of interest rates, consumer demand, the economy and our ability to maintain the appropriate level of interest rate risk on our balance sheet. See further discussions of our residential mortgage loan origination activity under the “Loan Portfolio” section of this MD&A above and the fair valuation of our loans held for sale at Note 6 of the consolidated financial statements.

Net gains on sale of assets increased $429 thousand to a $281 thousand net gain for the three months ended March 31, 2015 as compared to a $148 thousand loss for the same quarter in 2014. The net gain during the first quarter of 2015 included a $118 thousand gain on the sale of a repossessed aircraft.

The Bank and the FDIC share in the losses on loans and real estate owned as part of the loss-sharing agreements entered into on both of our previous FDIC-assisted transactions. The asset arising from the loss-sharing agreements is referred to as the “FDIC loss-share receivable” in our consolidated statements of financial condition. Within the non-interest income category, we may recognize income or expense related to the change in the FDIC loss-share receivable resulting from (i) a change in the estimated credit losses on the pools of covered loans, (ii) income from reimbursable expenses incurred during the period, (iii) accretion of the discount resulting from the present value of the receivable recorded at the acquisition dates, and (iv) prospective recognition of decreases in the receivable attributable to better than originally estimated cash flows on certain covered loan pools. The aggregate effect of changes in the FDIC loss-share receivable amounted to a $3.9 million and $76 thousand net reduction in non-interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The majority of the reduction in both the receivable and non-interest income during the first quarter of 2015 relates to the prospective adjustment to the receivable related to better than originally estimated cash flows on certain pools of covered loans since the acquisition date. Valley does not expect a reduction in non-interest income related to additional cash flows on pooled loans during the second quarter of 2015, as the receivable was prospectively reduced for such additional cash flows over the shorter term of the commercial loan loss-sharing agreements (related to Valley's 2010 FDIC-assisted transactions) that expired in March 2015.

See the “FDIC Loss-Share Receivable Related to Covered Loans and Foreclosed Assets” section below in this MD&A and Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for further details.

Non-Interest Expense

The following table presents the components of non-interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015		2014
	(in thousands)
Salary and employee benefits expense	$	56,712	$	48,088
Net occupancy and equipment expense	22,200		20,724
FDIC insurance assessment	3,792		3,287
Amortization of other intangible assets	2,393		2,351
Professional and legal fees	3,341		3,678
Amortization of tax credit investments	4,496		3,716
Advertising	1,729		617
Other	13,455		13,638
Total non-interest expense	$	108,118	$	96,099

Salary and employee benefits expense increased $8.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014 largely due to a increases in salary expense, cash bonus accruals and payroll taxes. The higher salary expenses were mainly due to additional staffing expenses related to our acquisition of 1st United on November 1, 2014.

Net occupancy and equipment expenses increased $1.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 as compared to the same quarter in 2014 mainly due to higher rental expense caused by the 1st United acquisition as well as an increase in periodic repairs and maintenance expenses.

FDIC insurance assessments increased $505 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2015 as compared to the same quarter in 2014 largely due to our growth resulting from the acquisition of the 1st United.

Amortization of tax credit investments increased $780 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2015 as compared to the same quarter in 2014 mostly due to an increase in tax-advantaged investments over the last 12

months. These investments, while negatively impacting the level of our operating expenses and efficiency ratio, directly reduce our income tax expense and effective tax rate. See Note 15 for more details regarding our tax credit investments.

Advertising expense increased $1.1 million during the three months ended March 31, 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014 mainly due to our expanded $499 residential mortgage refinance promotional campaigns in New Jersey, New York and Florida, including television commercials in both English and Spanish. During the second quarter of 2015, we expect the advertising expense to remain elevated as compared to the first six months of 2014 as we continue to promote our lending operations, specifically the residential mortgage refinance program, due to the relatively low level of mortgage interest rates.

The efficiency ratio measures total non-interest expense as a percentage of net interest income plus total non-interest income. Our efficiency ratio was 71.73 percent and 71.31 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The negative upward movement in our efficiency ratio as compared to the first quarter of 2014 was mainly caused by an increase in non-interest expense, a higher reduction to non-interest income related to the change in our FDIC loss-share receivable, and the negative impact of the low interest rate environment on the yield of our interest earning assets. Additionally, our efficiency ratio is negatively impacted by the amortization of tax credit investments within our non-interest expense that result in tax credits that reduce our income tax expense. If the impact of the reduction to our FDIC loss-share receivable and the amortization of tax credit investments totaling a combined $8.4 million and $3.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, were excluded, our efficiency ratio would have been 67.00 percent and 68.51 percent, respectively, for the same periods of 2015 and 2014. Exclusive of such items, we strive to maintain a low efficiency ratio through diligent management of our operating expenses and balance sheet, including our continuous review of branch costs and opportunities to "right size" the number and size of our branch locations, and leverage new lower cost delivery channels.

We believe the efficiency ratio, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, provides a meaningful comparison of our operational performance and facilitates investors’ assessments of business performance and trends in comparison to our peers in the banking industry.

Income Taxes

Income tax expense was $12.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 reflecting an effective tax rate of 28.8 percent, as compared to $830 thousand for the first quarter of 2014 reflecting an effective tax rate of 2.4 percent.

The increase in effective tax rate and tax expense as compared to the first quarter of 2014 was primarily due to higher pre-tax income during the first quarter of 2015, as well as a $8.3 million reduction in our reserve for unrecognized tax benefits which reduced income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2014.

U.S. GAAP requires that any change in judgment or change in measurement of a tax position taken in a prior annual period be recognized as a discrete event in the quarter in which it occurs, rather than being recognized as a change in effective tax rate for the current year. Our adherence to these tax guidelines may result in volatile effective income tax rates in future quarterly and annual periods. Factors that could impact management’s judgment include changes in income, tax laws and regulations, and tax planning strategies. For the remainder of 2015, we anticipate that our effective tax rate will range from 27 percent to 29 percent primarily reflecting the impacts of tax-exempt income, tax-advantaged investments and general business credits.

Business Segments

We have four business segments that we monitor and report on to manage our business operations. These segments are consumer lending, commercial lending, investment management, and corporate and other adjustments. Our reportable segments have been determined based upon Valley’s internal structure of operations and lines of business. Each business segment is reviewed routinely for its asset growth, contribution to income before income taxes and return on average interest earning assets and impairment (if events or circumstances indicate a possible inability to realize the carrying amount). Expenses related to the branch network, all other components of retail

banking, along with the back office departments of our subsidiary bank are allocated from the corporate and other adjustments segment to each of the other three business segments. Interest expense and internal transfer expense (for general corporate expenses) are allocated to each business segment utilizing a “pool funding” methodology, which involves the allocation of uniform funding cost based on each segments’ average earning assets outstanding for the period. The financial reporting for each segment contains allocations and reporting in line with our operations, which may not necessarily be comparable to any other financial institution. The accounting for each segment includes internal accounting policies designed to measure consistent and reasonable financial reporting, and may result in income and expense measurements that differ from amounts under U.S. GAAP. Furthermore, changes in management structure or allocation methodologies and procedures may result in changes in reported segment financial data.

The following tables present the financial data for each business segment for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014:



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2015
	Consumer Lending			Commercial Lending			Investment Management			Corporate and Other Adjustments			Total
	($ in thousands)
Average interest earning assets	$	4,503,490		$	9,065,541		$	3,169,868		$	—		$	16,738,899
Income (loss) before income taxes	10,659			33,623			4,559			(6,228		)	42,613
Annualized return on average interest earning assets (before tax)	0.95		%	1.48		%	0.58		%	N/A			1.02		%



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
	Consumer Lending			Commercial Lending			Investment Management			Corporate and Other Adjustments			Total
	($ in thousands)
Average interest earning assets	$	3,995,148		$	7,622,449		$	2,848,025		$	—		$	14,465,622
Income (loss) before income taxes	12,180			24,376			5,866			(7,757		)	34,665
Annualized return on average interest earning assets (before tax)	1.22		%	1.28		%	0.82		%	N/A			0.96		%

Consumer Lending

This segment, representing approximately 33.7 percent of our loan portfolio at March 31, 2015, is mainly comprised of residential mortgage loans, home equity loans and automobile loans. The duration of the residential mortgage loan portfolio including covered loans (which represented 19.3 percent of our loan portfolio at March 31, 2015) is subject to movements in the market level of interest rates and forecasted prepayment speeds. The weighted average life of the automobile loans (representing 8.5 percent of total loans at March 31, 2015) is relatively unaffected by movements in the market level of interest rates. However, the average life may be impacted by new loans as a result of the availability of credit within the automobile marketplace and consumer demand for purchasing new or used automobiles. The consumer lending segment also includes the Wealth Management Division, comprised of trust, asset management, insurance services, and asset-based lending support services.

Average interest earing assets for the three months ended March 31, 2015 increased $508.3 million as compared to the first quarter of 2014 largely due to continued solid organic automobile loan and secured personal lines of credit growth over the last 12-month period, as well as an increase in residential mortgage originations since the fourth quarter of 2014 due to the low level of mortgage interest rates and higher retention of such loans for investment purposes. Additionally, we supplemented our organic originations with the purchase of $42.8 million in loan purchases from third party originators during the first quarter of 2015.

Income before income taxes decreased $1.5 million to $10.7 million for the first quarter of 2015 as compared to $12.2 million for the same quarter of 2014. The decrease was mainly caused by an increase of $4.5 million in non-interest expense caused, in part, by our recent acquisition of 1st United, partially offset by a $3.5 million increase in net interest income for the first quarter of 2015 largely due to higher average loan balances.

The net interest margin of 2.80 percent for the first quarter of 2015 was unchanged as compared to the same quarter one year ago as a 14 basis point decrease in yield on average loans largely caused by new and refinanced loan volumes at current interest rates was offset by a 14 basis point decrease in the costs associated with our funding sources. The decrease in our cost of funds was was primarily driven by the prepayment of $275 million in high cost long-term borrowings in December 2014, which had a combined weighted average interest rate of 4.52 percent.

Commercial Lending

The commercial lending segment is mainly comprised of floating rate and adjustable rate commercial and industrial loans, as well as fixed rate owner occupied and commercial real estate loans. Due to the portfolio’s interest rate characteristics, commercial lending is Valley’s business segment that is most sensitive to movements in market interest rates. Commercial and industrial loans totaled approximately $2.4 billion and represented 17.2 percent of the total loan portfolio at March 31, 2015. Commercial real estate loans and construction loans totaled $6.6 billion and represented 49.1 percent of the total loan portfolio at March 31, 2015.

Average interest earning assets for the three months ended March 31, 2015 increased $1.4 billion as compared to the same quarter of 2014. This increase was primarily attributable to the $1.2 billion of PCI loans acquired from 1st United in November 2014 coupled with continued loan growth mostly within the non-PCI commercial real estate loan portfolio over the last twelve months. We also supplemented our organic growth with the purchase of loan participations totaling $97.1 million during the first quarter. A sizable portion of the purchased loans are expected to qualify for CRA purposes.

For the three months ended March 31, 2015, income before income taxes increased $9.2 million to $33.6 million as compared to the same quarter in 2014 mostly due an increase in net interest income coupled with a decrease in the provision for credit losses, partially offset by a decrease in non-interest income and an increase in non-interest expense. Net interest income increased $15.7 million to $89.8 million for the first quarter of 2014 as compared to the same quarter of 2014 largely due to the increase in average loans. The provision for credit losses related to the commercial portfolios decreased $3.4 million to $814 thousand for the first quarter of 2015 as compared to the same quarter of 2014 mainly due to better credit metrics and outlook for the loan portfolio. Non-interest income decreased $4.1 million as compared to the first quarter of 2014 mainly due to the aggregate effect of changes in the FDIC loss-share receivable and non-interest expense increased partly due to Valley's expansion into Florida through the 1st United acquisition.

The net interest margin increased 7 basis points to 3.96 percent for the first quarter of 2015 as compared to the same quarter one year ago mainly as a result of a 14 basis points decrease in the cost of our funding sources partially offset by a 7 basis point decline decrease in yield on average loans. The decrease in the yield on loans was primarily due to the new and refinanced loan volumes at current interest rates that are relatively low compared to the overall yield of our loan portfolio, as well as a large volume of higher yielding loan repayments over the last 12 month period.

Investment Management

The investment management segment generates a large portion of our income through investments in various types of securities and interest-bearing deposits with other banks. These investments are mainly comprised of fixed rate securities, and depending on our liquid cash position, federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits with banks (primarily the Federal Reserve Bank of New York), as part of our asset/liability management strategies. The fixed rate investments are one of Valley’s least sensitive assets to changes in market interest rates. However, a portion of the investment portfolio is invested in shorter-duration securities to maintain the overall asset sensitivity of our balance sheet (see the “Asset/Liability Management” section below for further analysis).

Average investments increased $321.8 million during the first quarter of 2015 as compared to the same quarter in 2014 primarily due to a $283.7 million increase in average federal funds sold and other interest bearing deposits balances. This increase in our excess liquidity (mostly held in overnight interest bearing deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York) was mainly caused by strong retail deposit volumes primarily over the last six month period and the timing and growth of new loan originations.

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015, income before income taxes decreased approximately $1.3 million to $4.6 million compared to $5.9 million for the same quarter in 2014 mostly due to a $1.2 million decrease in net interest income. The decrease in net interest income was mainly driven by normal investment repayments and the purchases of new investments at lower current market yields.

The net interest margin decreased 39 basis points to 1.97 percent for the first quarter of 2015 as compared to the same quarter one year ago largely due to a 53 basis point decrease in the yield on investments, partially offset by

a 14 basis points decrease in costs associated with our funding sources.

Corporate and other adjustments

The amounts disclosed as “corporate and other adjustments” represent income and expense items not directly attributable to a specific segment, including net trading and securities gains and losses, and net impairment losses on securities not reported in the investment management segment above, interest expense related to subordinated notes, as well as income and expense from derivative financial instruments.

The loss before income taxes for the corporate segment decreased $1.5 million to $6.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 as compared to $7.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 mainly due to a $2.2 million increase in non-interest income as compared to the third quarter of 2013. The increase in non-interest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 was largely due to $2.4 million increase in net gains on securities transactions for the three months ended March 31, 2015 as compared with the first quarter 2014. In addition, non-interest expense increased $5.0 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2015 but was largely offset by an $4.2 million increase in the internal transfer income as compared to the first quarter of 2014.

ASSET/LIABILITY MANAGEMENT

Interest Rate Sensitivity

Our success is largely dependent upon our ability to manage interest rate risk. Interest rate risk can be defined as the exposure of our interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities to the movement in interest rates. Our Asset/Liability Management Committee is responsible for managing such risks and establishing policies that monitor and coordinate our sources and uses of funds. Asset/Liability management is a continuous process due to the constant change in interest rate risk factors. In assessing the appropriate interest rate risk levels for us, management weighs the potential benefit of each risk management activity within the desired parameters of liquidity, capital levels and management’s tolerance for exposure to income fluctuations. Many of the actions undertaken by management utilize fair value analysis and attempts to achieve consistent accounting and economic benefits for financial assets and their related funding sources. We have predominately focused on managing our interest rate risk by attempting to match the inherent risk and cash flows of financial assets and liabilities. Specifically, management employs multiple risk management activities such as optimizing the level of new residential mortgage originations retained in our mortgage portfolio through increasing or decreasing loan sales in the secondary market, product pricing levels, the desired maturity levels for new originations, the composition levels of both our interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities, as well as several other risk management activities.

We use a simulation model to analyze net interest income sensitivity to movements in interest rates. The simulation model projects net interest income based on various interest rate scenarios over a 12-month and 24-month period. The model is based on the actual maturity and re-pricing characteristics of rate sensitive assets and liabilities. The

model incorporates certain assumptions which management believes to be reasonable regarding the impact of changing interest rates and the prepayment assumptions of certain assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2015. The model assumes changes in interest rates without any proactive change in the composition or size of the balance sheet by management. In the model, the forecasted shape of the yield curve remains static as of March 31, 2015. The impact of interest rate derivatives, such as interest rate swaps and caps, is also included in the model.

Our simulation model is based on market interest rates and prepayment speeds prevalent in the market as of March 31, 2015. Although the size of Valley’s balance sheet is forecasted to remain static as of March 31, 2015 in our model, the composition is adjusted to reflect new interest earning assets and funding originations coupled with rate spreads utilizing our actual originations during the first quarter of 2015. The model also utilizes an immediate parallel shift in the market interest rates at March 31, 2015.

The following table reflects management’s expectations of the change in our net interest income over the next 12- month period in light of the aforementioned assumptions:



	Estimated Change in Future Net Interest Income
Changes in Interest Rates	Dollar Change			Percentage Change
(in basis points)	($ in thousands)
+200	$	(2,381	)	(0.47	)%
+100	(3,061		)	(0.60	)
–100	(13,062		)	(2.56	)

The assumptions used in the net interest income simulation are inherently uncertain. Actual results may differ significantly from those presented in the table above due to the frequency and timing of changes in interest rates and changes in spreads between maturity and re-pricing categories. Overall, our net interest income is affected by changes in interest rates and cash flows from our loan and investment portfolios. We actively manage these cash flows in conjunction with our liability mix, duration and interest rates to optimize the net interest income, while structuring the balance sheet in response to actual or potential changes in interest rates. Additionally, our net interest income is impacted by the level of competition within our marketplace. Competition can negatively impact the level of interest rates attainable on loans and increase the cost of deposits, which may result in downward pressure on our net interest margin in future periods. Other factors, including, but not limited to, the slope of the yield curve and projected cash flows will impact our net interest income results and may increase or decrease the level of asset sensitivity of our balance sheet.

Convexity is a measure of how the duration of a financial instrument changes as market interest rates change. Potential movements in the convexity of bonds held in our investment portfolio, as well as the duration of the loan portfolio may have a positive or negative impact on our net interest income in varying interest rate environments. As a result, the increase or decrease in forecasted net interest income may not have a linear relationship to the results reflected in the table above. Management cannot provide any assurance about the actual effect of changes in interest rates on our net interest income.

As noted in the table above, a 100 basis point immediate increase in interest rates is projected to decrease net interest income over the next 12 months by 0.60 percent. Our balance sheet sensitivity to such a move in interest rates at March 31, 2015 moderately increased as compared to December 31, 2014 (which was a decrease of 0.52 percent in net interest income over a 12 month period). Additionally, our current asset sensitivity to a 100 basis point increase in interest rates is somewhat limited by the fact that many of our adjustable rate loans are tied to the Valley prime rate (set by management), which currently exceeds the U.S. prime rate by 125 basis points. Due to its current level above the U.S. prime rate, the Valley prime rate is not projected to increase under the 100 basis point immediate increase scenario in our simulation, but would increase and positively impact our net interest income in a 200 basis point immediate increase in interest rates scenario. Our projections for such prime rate based loans could vary from the actual movements in the Valley prime rate, which is set by management and may change prior to the U.S. prime rate reaching its current level of 4.50 percent. Other factors, including, but not limited to, the slope of

the yield curve and projected cash flows, will impact our net interest income results and may increase or decrease the level of asset sensitivity of our balance sheet.

Although we do not expect our Valley prime rate loan portfolio to have an immediate benefit to our interest income in a rising interest rate environment, we attempt to manage the Bank’s aggregate sensitivity in a manner to mitigate the potential lag in the portfolio's re-pricing. We expect interest income and yield on many of our residential mortgage-backed securities with unamortized purchase premiums to improve if interest rates were to move upward and prepayment speeds on the underlying mortgages decline. The decline in prepayments will lengthen the expected life of each security and reduce the amount of premium amortization expense recognized against interest income each period.

Our interest rate swaps and caps designated as cash flow hedging relationships are designed to protect us from upward movements in interest rates on certain deposits based on the prime rate (as reported by The Wall Street Journal). We have 4 cash flow hedge interest rate swaps with a total notional value of $300 million at March 31, 2015 that currently pay fixed and receive floating rates, as well as 3 interest rate caps with a total notional value of $225 million. Additionally, we also currently utilize fair value and non-designated hedge interest rate swaps to effectively convert fixed rate loans, brokered certificates of deposit and long-term borrowings to floating rate instruments. The cash flow hedges are expected to benefit our net interest income in a rising interest rate environment. However, due to the prolonged low level of market interest rates and the strike rate of these instruments, the cash flow hedge interest rate swaps, as well as a large portion of our interest rate caps, negatively impacted our net interest income during both the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014. Despite the expiration of two of the three interest rate caps in the third quarter of 2015, we expect this negative trend to continue for the remaining derivatives into the foreseeable future due to the Federal Reserve’s current monetary policies impacting the level of market interest rates. See Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for further details on our derivative transactions.

Liquidity

Bank Liquidity

Liquidity measures the ability to satisfy current and future cash flow needs as they become due. A bank’s liquidity reflects its ability to meet loan demand, to accommodate possible outflows in deposits and to take advantage of interest rate opportunities in the marketplace. Liquidity management is monitored by our Asset/Liability Management Committee and the Investment Committee of the Board of Directors of Valley National Bank, which review historical funding requirements, current liquidity position, sources and stability of funding, marketability of assets, options for attracting additional funds, and anticipated future funding needs, including the level of unfunded commitments. Our goal is to maintain sufficient asset-based liquidity to cover potential funding requirements in order to minimize our dependence on volatile and potentially unstable funding markets.

The Bank has no required regulatory liquidity ratios to maintain; however, it adheres to an internal liquidity policy. The current policy maintains that we may not have a ratio of loans to deposits in excess of 120 percent and non-core funding (which generally includes certificates of deposit $100 thousand and over, federal funds purchased, repurchase agreements and FHLB advances) greater than 50 percent of total assets. The Bank was in compliance with the foregoing policies at March 31, 2015.

On the asset side of the balance sheet, the Bank has numerous sources of liquid funds in the form of cash and due from banks, interest bearing deposits with banks (including the Federal Reserve Bank of New York), investment securities held to maturity that are maturing within 90 days or would otherwise qualify as maturities if sold (i.e., 85 percent of original cost basis has been repaid), investment securities available for sale, loans held for sale, and, from time to time, federal funds sold and receivables related to unsettled securities transactions. These liquid assets totaled approximately $1.7 billion, representing 10.3 percent of earning assets, at March 31, 2015 and $1.9 billion, representing 11.3 percent of earning assets, at December 31, 2014. Of the $1.7 billion of liquid assets at March 31, 2015, approximately $396.7 million of various investment securities were pledged to counterparties to support our

earning asset funding strategies. We anticipate the receipt of approximately $474.1 million in principal from securities in the total investment portfolio over the next 12 months due to normally scheduled principal repayments and expected prepayments of certain securities, primarily residential mortgage-backed securities.

Additional liquidity is derived from scheduled loan payments of principal and interest, as well as prepayments received. Loan principal payments (including loans held for sale at March 31, 2015) are projected to be approximately $4.2 billion over the next 12 months. As a contingency plan for significant funding needs, liquidity could also be derived from the sale of conforming residential mortgages from our loan portfolio, or from the temporary curtailment of lending activities.

On the liability side of the balance sheet, we utilize multiple sources of funds to meet liquidity needs, including retail and commercial deposits, brokered and municipal funds, and short-term and long-term borrowings. Our core deposit base, which generally excludes certificates of deposit over $100 thousand as well as brokered certificates of deposit, represents the largest of these sources. Core deposits averaged approximately $12.7 billion and $10.8 billion for the first quarter of 2015 and for the year ended December 31, 2014, respectively, representing 75.8 percent and 71.9 percent of average earning assets for the periods of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. The level of interest bearing deposits is affected by interest rates offered, which is often influenced by our need for funds and the need to match the maturities of assets and liabilities.

Additional funding may be provided from short-term liquidity borrowings through deposit gathering networks and in the form of federal funds purchased through our well established relationships with several correspondent banks. While there are no firm lending commitments currently in place, management believes that we could borrow approximately $750 million for a short time from these banks on a collective basis. The Bank is also a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York and has the ability to borrow from them in the form of FHLB advances secured by pledges of certain eligible collateral, including but not limited to U.S. government and agency mortgage-backed securities and a blanket assignment of qualifying first lien mortgage loans, consisting of both residential mortgage and commercial real estate loans. In addition to the FHLB advances, the Bank has pledged such assets to collateralize a $350 million letter of credit issued by the FHLB on Valley’s behalf to secure certain public deposits at March 31, 2015. Furthermore, we are able to obtain overnight borrowings from the Federal Reserve Bank via the discount window as a contingency for additional liquidity. At March 31, 2015, our borrowing capacity under the Federal Reserve's discount window was approximately $1.1 billion.

We also have access to other short-term and long-term borrowing sources to support our asset base, such as securities sold under agreements to repurchase (repos). Our short-term borrowings decreased $12.9 million to $133.9 million at March 31, 2015 as compared to $146.8 million at December 31, 2014 entirely due to lower repo balance activity. At March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, all short-term repos represent customer deposit balances being swept into this vehicle overnight.

Corporation Liquidity

Valley’s recurring cash requirements primarily consist of dividends to common shareholders and interest expense on subordinated notes and junior subordinated debentures issued to capital trusts. As part of our on-going asset/liability management strategies, Valley could also use cash to repurchase shares of its outstanding common stock under its share repurchase program or redeem its callable junior subordinated debentures. These cash needs are routinely satisfied by dividends collected from the Bank. Projected cash flows from the Bank are expected to be adequate to pay common dividends, if declared, and interest expense payable to subordinated note holders and capital trusts, given the current capital levels and current profitable operations of the bank subsidiary. In addition to dividends received from the Bank, Valley can satisfy its cash requirements by utilizing its own cash, selling securities from its available for sale investment portfolio, as well as potential new funds borrowed from outside sources or capital issuances. Valley also has the right to defer interest payments on the junior subordinated debentures, and therefore distributions on its trust preferred securities for consecutive quarterly periods up to five years, but not beyond the stated maturity dates, and subject to other conditions.

Investment Securities Portfolio

As of March 31, 2015, we had approximately $1.8 billion and $783.2 million in held to maturity and available for sale investment securities, respectively. During the first quarter of 2015, the two single-issuer bank trust preferred securities classified as trading at December 31, 2014 were either sold or redeemed by the issuer. Both of the securities transactions resulted in an immaterial aggregate net trading loss for the first quarter of 2015 which was included in the other non-interest income category of our consolidated statements of income.

At March 31, 2015, our investment portfolio was comprised of U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government agencies, tax-exempt issues of states and political subdivisions, residential mortgage-backed securities (including 12 private label mortgage-backed securities), single-issuer trust preferred securities principally issued by bank holding companies (including 2 pooled securities), high quality corporate bonds and perpetual preferred and common equity securities issued by banks. There were no securities in the name of any one issuer exceeding 10 percent of shareholders’ equity, except for residential mortgage-backed securities issued by Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Among other securities, our investments in the private label mortgage-backed securities, trust preferred securities, perpetual preferred securities, equity securities, and bank issued corporate bonds may pose a higher risk of future impairment charges to us as a result of the uncertain economic recovery and its potential negative effect on the future performance of the security issuers and, if applicable, the underlying mortgage loan collateral of the security.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Analysis

We may be required to record impairment charges on our investment securities if they suffer a decline in value that is considered other-than-temporary. Numerous factors, including lack of liquidity for re-sales of certain investment securities, absence of reliable pricing information for investment securities, adverse changes in business climate, adverse actions by regulators, or unanticipated changes in the competitive environment could have a negative effect on our investment portfolio and may result in other-than temporary impairment on our investment securities in future periods. See our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 for additional information regarding our impairment analysis by security type.

The investment grades in the table below reflect the most current independent analysis performed by third parties of each security as of the date presented and not necessarily the investment grades at the date of our purchase of the securities. For many securities, the rating agencies may not have performed an independent analysis of the tranches owned by us, but rather an analysis of the entire investment pool. For this and other reasons, we believe the assigned investment grades may not accurately reflect the actual credit quality of each security and should not be viewed in isolation as a measure of the quality of our investment portfolio.

The following table presents the held to maturity and available for sale investment securities portfolios by investment grades at March 31, 2015.



	March 31, 2015
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Held to maturity investment grades:*
AAA Rated	$	1,358,647	$	43,146	$	(3,811	)	$	1,397,982
AA Rated	260,527		11,767		(228		)	272,066
A Rated	28,775		1,674		(3		)	30,446
BBB Rated	33,848		2,687		(96		)	36,439
Non-investment grade	20,897		12		(576		)	20,333
Not rated	123,125		44		(11,810		)	111,359
Total investment securities held to maturity	$	1,825,819	$	59,330	$	(16,524	)	$	1,868,625
Available for sale investment grades:*
AAA Rated	$	697,378	$	6,387	$	(4,459	)	$	699,306
AA Rated	25,833		1,021		(1,561		)	25,293
A Rated	35,335		27		(352		)	35,010
BBB Rated	39,918		774		(943		)	39,749
Non-investment grade	20,315		858		(1,235		)	19,938
Not rated	24,265		454		(497		)	24,222
Total investment securities available for sale	$	843,044	$	9,521	$	(9,047	)	$	843,518



*	Rated using external rating agencies (primarily S&P and Moody’s). Ratings categories include the entire range. For example, “A rated” includes A+, A, and A-. Split rated securities with two ratings are categorized at the higher of the rating levels.

The held to maturity portfolio includes $123.1 million in investments not rated by the rating agencies with aggregate unrealized losses of $11.8 million at March 31, 2015. The unrealized losses for this category primarily relate to 4 single-issuer bank trust preferred issuances with a combined amortized cost of $35.9 million. All single-issuer bank trust preferred securities classified as held to maturity, including the aforementioned four securities, are paying in accordance with their terms and have no deferrals of interest or defaults. Additionally, we analyze the performance of each issuer on a quarterly basis, including a review of performance data from the issuer’s most recent bank regulatory report to assess the company’s credit risk and the probability of impairment of the contractual cash flows of the applicable security. Based upon our quarterly review at March 31, 2015, all of the issuers appear to meet the regulatory capital minimum requirements to be considered a “well-capitalized” financial institution and/or have maintained performance levels adequate to support the contractual cash flows of the security.

There was no other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings as a result of Valley's impairment analysis of its securities during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 as the collateral supporting much of the investment securities has improved or performed as expected.

Loan Portfolio

The following table reflects the composition of the loan portfolio as of the dates presented:



	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014			September 30, 2014			June 30, 2014			March 31, 2014
	($ in thousands)
Non-covered loans
Commercial and industrial	$	2,361,987		$	2,237,298		$	2,076,512		$	2,064,751		$	2,019,099
Commercial real estate:
Commercial real estate	6,097,017			6,032,190			5,346,818			5,100,442			5,083,744
Construction	538,937			529,963			457,163			413,262			413,795
Total commercial real estate	6,635,954			6,562,153			5,803,981			5,513,704			5,497,539
Residential mortgage	2,585,782			2,515,675			2,436,022			2,461,516			2,472,180
Consumer:
Home equity	482,265			491,745			435,450			436,360			440,006
Automobile	1,162,963			1,144,831			1,091,287			1,021,782			957,036
Other consumer	321,784			310,320			275,834			252,762			227,804
Total consumer loans	1,967,012			1,946,896			1,802,571			1,710,904			1,624,846
Total non-covered loans	13,550,735			13,262,022			12,119,086			11,750,875			11,613,664
Covered loans (1)	183,726			211,891			46,291			62,553			80,930
Total loans (2)	$	13,734,461		$	13,473,913		$	12,165,377		$	11,813,428		$	11,694,594
As a percent of total loans:
Commercial and industrial	17.3		%	16.6		%	17.1		%	17.5		%	17.3		%
Commercial real estate	48.3		%	48.7		%	47.7		%	46.7		%	47.0		%
Residential mortgage	18.8		%	18.7		%	20.0		%	20.8		%	21.1		%
Consumer loans	14.3		%	14.4		%	14.8		%	14.5		%	13.9		%
Covered loans	1.3		%	1.6		%	0.4		%	0.5		%	0.7		%
Total	100.0		%	100.0		%	100.0		%	100.0		%	100.0		%


(1)	Covered loans primarily consist of commercial real estate loans and residential mortgage loans.


(2)	Total loans are net of unearned discount and deferred loan fees totaling $9.2 million, $9.0 million, $8.0 million, $7.3 million, and $6.1 million at March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, September 30, 2014, June 30, 2014 and March 31, 2014, respectively.

Non-covered Loans

Non-covered loans (loans not subject to loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC) increased $288.7 million, or 8.7 percent on an annualized basis, to approximately $13.6 billion at March 31, 2015 from December 31, 2014, despite loan repayments of $44.5 million in our non-covered PCI loan portion of this portfolio. The increase in total non-covered loans was mainly due to solid growth across several loan portfolios, except for home equity loans (as discussed further below).

Total commercial and industrial loans increased $124.7 million, or 22.3 percent on an annualized basis, from December 31, 2014 to approximately $2.4 billion at March 31, 2015 due, in part, to new loan demand from both new and existing customers generally in our New York market, including a few relatively large loan relationships. While these new loan volumes more than offset our normal repayment and refinance activity, including loan repayments of $9.7 million in our PCI loan portfolio, we continued to experience significant market competition for quality credits during the first quarter.

Total commercial real estate loans (excluding construction loans) increased $64.8 million from December 31, 2014 to $6.1 billion at March 31, 2015. Loan origination volumes and demand were seen across many segments of commercial real estate borrowers in the majority of our markets. The continued organic growth within the

commercial real estate portfolio was supplemented by our expanded relationships with other financial institutions in our local market and the resulting purchase of participations in multi-family loans (mostly in New York City) totaling $97.1 million during the first quarter. A sizable portion of the purchased loans are expected to qualify for CRA purposes. Construction loans outstanding totaled $538.9 million at March 31, 2015 and increased $9.0 million from December 31, 2014.

Total residential mortgage loans increased $70.1 million to approximately $2.6 billion at March 31, 2015 from December 31, 2014 mostly due to a moderate increase in loan origination volumes as compared to the fourth quarter of 2014, a higher amount of loan originations retained for investment purposes, and $42.8 million in loan purchases from two third party originators during the first quarter of 2015. Despite the low level of mortgage interest rates, consumer demand for new and refinanced mortgage loans remained relatively modest during the first quarter of 2015. Total residential mortgage loan originations totaled approximately $121.8 million for the first quarter of 2015 as compared to $115.3 million and $64.7 million for the fourth and first quarter of 2014, respectively. During the first quarter of 2015, Valley sold approximately $31.1 million of residential mortgages originated for sale (including $17.2 million of residential mortgage loans held for sale at December 31, 2014).

Total consumer loans increased $20.1 million to $2.0 billion at March 31, 2015 from December 31, 2014 largely due to increases in both the automobile and other consumer loan portfolios during the first quarter of 2015. Automobile loans increased by $18.1 million to $1.2 billion at March 31, 2015 as compared to December 31, 2014 as our new organic loan volumes continued to be solid due to the overall strength of the U.S. auto markets. Additionally, Valley has recently added a number of Florida auto dealers to its network and anticipates that this network expansion will supplement the solid origination volumes seen over the past several quarters. Valley has achieved its auto loan growth without participation in the subprime auto lending markets. Other consumer loans increased $11.5 million to $321.8 million at March 31, 2015 as compared to $310.3 million at December 31, 2014 mainly due to continued growth and customer usage of collateralized personal lines of credit. However, home equity loans totaling $482.3 million at March 31, 2015 decreased by $9.5 million as compared to December 31, 2014 largely due to normal repayments and the continued lower level of customer demand since the substantial slowdown in consumer refinance market during 2013.

With our relatively new access to the solid Florida market, an uptick in commercial loan activity in most of our markets and the low level of long-term market interest rates, we are cautiously optimistic that we will continue to experience solid loan growth. However, we continue to experience strong market competition for high quality commercial credits and we can make no assurances that our total loans will increase, or remain at current levels in the future.

Most of our lending is in northern and central New Jersey, New York City and Long Island, with the exception of loans acquired in our recent acquisition of 1st United (mostly sourced in Florida) and smaller auto and residential mortgage loan portfolios derived from the other neighboring states, which could present a geographic and credit risk if there was another significant broad based economic downturn or a prolonged economic recovery within the region. We are witnessing new loan activity across Valley’s entire geographic footprint, including new loans and strong loan pipelines from our Florida lending operations, however the New York and Long Island markets continue to account for a disproportionate percentage of our lending activity. To mitigate these risks, we make efforts to maintain a diversified portfolio as to type of borrower and loan to guard against a potential downward turn in any one economic sector. Geographically, we expect to make further inroads in the Florida lending market as commercial lending synergies are realized following completion of our late February 2015 systems integration and our current consumer lending advertising campaigns take hold.

Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans (Including Covered Loans)

PCI loans mostly consist of loans acquired in business combinations subsequent to 2011 and covered loans in which the Bank will share losses with the FDIC under loss-sharing agreements that have resulted from two FDIC-assisted transactions by Valley in 2010 and acquired loss-sharing agreements from 1st United in 2014 (which relate to prior FDIC-assisted transactions from 2009 to 2011). Our non-covered and covered PCI loan portfolios totaled $1.5 billion and $183.7 million at March 31, 2015, respectively. As required by U.S. GAAP, all of our PCI loans are accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30. This accounting guidance requires the PCI loans to be aggregated and accounted for as pools of loans based on common risk characteristics. A pool is accounted for as one asset with a single composite interest rate, aggregate fair value and expected cash flows.

For PCI loan pools accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the difference between the contractually required payments due and the cash flows expected to be collected, considering the impact of prepayments, is referred to as the non-accretable difference. The contractually required payments due represent the total undiscounted amount of all uncollected principal and interest payments. Contractually required payments due may increase or decrease for a variety of reasons, e.g. when the contractual terms of the loan agreement are modified, when interest rates on variable rate loans change, or when principal and/or interest payments are received. The Bank estimates the undiscounted cash flows expected to be collected by incorporating several key assumptions including probability of default, loss given default, and the amount of actual prepayments after the acquisition dates. The non-accretable difference, which is neither accreted into income nor recorded on our consolidated balance sheet, reflects estimated future credit losses and uncollectable contractual interest expected to be incurred over the life of the loans. The excess of the undiscounted cash flows expected at the acquisition date over the carrying amount (fair value) of the PCI loans is referred to as the accretable yield. This amount is accreted into interest income over the remaining life of the loans, or pool of loans, using the level yield method. The accretable yield is affected by changes in interest rate indices for variable rate loans, changes in prepayment assumptions, and changes in expected principal and interest payments over the estimated lives of the loans. Prepayments affect the estimated life of PCI loans and could change the amount of interest income, and possibly principal, expected to be collected. Reclassifications of the non-accretable difference to the accretable yield may occur subsequent to the loan acquisition dates due to increases in expected cash flows of the loan pools.

At both acquisition and subsequent quarterly reporting dates, we use a third party service provider to assist with validation of our assessment of the contractual and estimated cash flows. Valley provides the third party with updated loan-level information derived from Valley’s main operating system, contractually required loan payments and expected cash flows for each loan pool individually reviewed by us. Using this information, the third party provider determines both the contractual cash flows and cash flows expected to be collected. The loan-level information used to reforecast the cash flows was subsequently aggregated on a pool basis. The expected payment data, discount rates, impairment data and changes to the accretable yield received back from the third party were reviewed by Valley to determine whether this information is accurate and the resulting financial statement effects are reasonable.

Similar to contractual cash flows, we reevaluate expected cash flows on a quarterly basis. Unlike contractual cash flows which are determined based on known factors, significant management assumptions are necessary in forecasting the estimated cash flows. We attempt to ensure the forecasted expectations are reasonable based on the information currently available; however, due to the uncertainties inherent in the use of estimates, actual cash flow results may differ from our forecast and the differences may be significant. To mitigate such differences, we carefully prepare and review the assumptions utilized in forecasting estimated cash flows.

On a quarterly basis, Valley analyzes the actual cash flow versus the forecasts at the loan pool level and variances are reviewed to determine their cause. In re-forecasting future estimated cash flow, Valley will adjust the credit loss expectations for loan pools, as necessary. These adjustments are based, in part, on actual loss severities recognized for each loan type, as well as changes in the probability of default. For periods in which Valley does not reforecast estimated cash flows, the prior reporting period’s estimated cash flows are adjusted to reflect the actual cash received and credit events which transpired during the current reporting period.

The following tables summarize the changes in the carrying amounts of non-covered PCI loans and covered loans (net of the allowance for losses on covered loans), and the accretable yield on these loans for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015						2014
	Carrying Amount, Net			Accretable Yield			Carrying Amount, Net			Accretable Yield
	(in thousands)
Non-covered PCI loans:
Balance, beginning of the period	$	1,509,910		$	280,766		$	710,103		$	198,198
Accretion	22,325			(22,325		)	10,779			(10,779		)
Payments received	(78,640		)	—			(59,213		)	—
Other, net	11,860			—			—			—
Balance, end of the period	$	1,465,455		$	258,441		$	661,669		$	187,419
Covered loans:
Balance, beginning of the period	$	211,691		$	55,442		$	89,095		$	25,601
Accretion	4,025			(4,025		)	3,155			(3,155		)
Payments received	(19,547		)	—			(16,560		)	—
Transfers to other real estate owned	—			—			(1,830		)	—
Other, net	(12,443		)	—			—			—
Balance, end of the period	$	183,726		$	51,417		$	73,860		$	22,446

Covered loans in the table above are presented net of the allowance for losses on covered loans, which totaled $200 thousand at March 31, 2015 as compared to $7.1 million at March 31, 2014. This allowance was established due to a decrease in the expected cash flows for certain pools of covered loans based on higher levels of credit impairment than originally forecasted by us at the acquisition dates. During the first quarter of 2015, we reclassified covered PCI loans totaling $12.3 million (included in both "other, net" categories in the table above) to non-covered PCI loans due to the expiration of a commercial (i.e., non-single family) loan loss-sharing agreement with the FDIC on December 31, 2014 that was acquired in the 1st United acquisition on November 1, 2014.

Although we recognized additional credit impairment for certain covered pools in 2011 and the lower levels of accretion shown in the table above due to the normal contraction in the PCI loan portfolios year over year, on an aggregate basis the acquired pools of covered and non-covered loans continue to perform better than originally expected at the acquisition dates. Based on our current estimates, we expect to receive more future cash flows than originally modeled at the acquisition dates. For the pools with better than expected cash flows, the forecasted increase is recorded as a prospective adjustment to our interest income on these loan pools over future periods. The decrease in the FDIC loss-share receivable due to the increase in expected cash flows for covered loan pools is recognized on a prospective basis over the shorter period of the lives of the loan pools and the loss-share agreements accordingly. During the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, we reduced our FDIC loss-share receivable by $4.1 million and 1.9 million, respectively, due to the prospective recognition of the effect of additional cash flows from covered loan pools with a corresponding reduction in non-interest income for the period (see table in the next section below).

FDIC Loss-Share Receivable Related to Covered Loans and Foreclosed Assets

The receivable arising from the loss sharing agreements (referred to as the “FDIC loss-share receivable” in our statements of financial condition) is measured separately from the covered loan pools because the agreements are not contractually part of the covered loans and are not transferable should the Bank choose to dispose of the covered loans. As of the acquisition dates for the FDIC-assisted transactions, we recorded an aggregate FDIC loss-share receivable of $108.0 million, consisting of the present value of the expected future cash flows the Bank

expected to receive from the FDIC under the loss sharing agreements. During the fourth quarter of 2014 we recorded a $7.5 million addition to the FDIC loss-share receivable related to the estimated amounts receivable under loss-sharing agreements acquired from 1st United on November 1, 2014. The FDIC loss-share receivable is reduced as the loss sharing payments are received from the FDIC for losses realized on covered loans and other real estate owned acquired in the FDIC-assisted transactions. Actual or expected losses in excess of the acquisition date estimates, accretion of the acquisition date present value discount, and other reimbursable expenses covered by the FDIC loss-sharing agreements will result in an increase in the FDIC loss-share receivable and the immediate recognition of non-interest income in our financial statements, together with an increase in the non-accretable difference. A decrease in expected losses would generally result in a corresponding decline in the FDIC loss-share receivable and the non-accretable difference. Reductions in the FDIC loss-share receivable due to actual or expected losses that are less than the acquisition date estimates are recognized prospectively over the shorter of (i) the estimated life of the applicable pools of covered loans or (ii) the term of the loss sharing agreements with the FDIC.

The following table presents changes in the FDIC loss-share receivable for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015			2014
	(in thousands)
Balance, beginning of the period	$	13,848		$	32,757
Discount accretion of the present value at the acquisition dates	43			11
Effect of additional cash flows on covered loans (prospective recognition)	(4,072		)	(1,856		)
Other reimbursable expenses	98			513
Reimbursements from the FDIC	(1,954		)	(1,424		)
Other	(355		)	1,256
Balance, end of the period	$	7,608		$	31,257

The aggregate effect of changes in the FDIC loss-share receivable was a reduction in non-interest income of $3.9 million and $76 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The larger reduction (in both the receivable and non-interest income) during the first quarter of 2015 was mainly caused by the increase in our prospective recognition of the effect of additional cash flows from certain pooled loans. Valley does not expect a reduction in non-interest income related to additional cash flows on pooled loans during the second quarter of 2015, as the receivable was prospectively reduced for such additional cash flows over the shorter term of the commercial loan loss-sharing agreements (related to Valley's FDIC-assisted transactions in 2010) that expired in March 2015.

Non-performing Assets

Non-performing assets (excluding PCI loans) include non-accrual loans, other real estate owned (OREO), other repossessed assets (primarily consisting of automobiles) and non-accrual debt securities at March 31, 2015. Loans are generally placed on non-accrual status when they become past due in excess of 90 days as to payment of principal or interest. Exceptions to the non-accrual policy may be permitted if the loan is sufficiently collateralized and in the process of collection. OREO is acquired through foreclosure on loans secured by land or real estate. OREO and other repossessed assets are reported at the lower of cost or fair value, less cost to sell at the time of acquisition and at the lower of fair value, less estimated costs to sell, or cost thereafter. The level of non-performing assets has decreased 16 percent over the last 12 month period (as shown in the table below) and remained relatively low as a percentage of the total loan portfolio at March 31, 2015. Past due loans and non-accrual loans in the table below exclude non-covered and covered PCI loans. Under U.S. GAAP, the PCI loans (acquired at a discount that is due, in part, to credit quality) are accounted for on a pool basis and are not subject to delinquency classification in the same manner as loans originated by Valley. For details regarding performing and non-performing PCI loans, see the "Credit quality indicators" section in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements.

The following table sets forth by loan category accruing past due and non-performing assets on the dates indicated in conjunction with our asset quality ratios:



	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014			September 30, 2014			June 30, 2014			March 31, 2014
	($ in thousands)
Accruing past due loans: ⁽¹⁾
30 to 59 days past due:
Commercial and industrial	$	4,472		$	1,630		$	476		$	4,918		$	5,689
Commercial real estate	4,775			8,938			1,194			3,493			16,169
Construction	6,577			448			—			3,988			5,616
Residential mortgage	12,498			6,200			8,871			7,865			6,238
Consumer	2,875			2,982			3,741			3,350			2,685
Total 30 to 59 days past due	31,197			20,198			14,282			23,614			36,397
60 to 89 days past due:
Commercial and industrial	90			1,102			629			783			599
Commercial real estate	1,883			113			788			57			2,377
Construction	—			—			154			5,332			—
Residential mortgage	1,782			3,575			2,304			1,989			1,721
Consumer	837			764			913			788			613
Total 60 to 89 days past due	4,592			5,554			4,788			8,949			5,310
90 or more days past due:
Commercial and industrial	208			226			256			450			199
Commercial real estate	2,792			49			52			2,212			137
Construction	—			3,988			9,833			—			—
Residential mortgage	564			1,063			2,057			546			1,033
Consumer	262			152			278			161			205
Total 90 or more days past due	3,826			5,478			12,476			3,369			1,574
Total accruing past due loans	$	39,615		$	31,230		$	31,546		$	35,932		$	43,281
Non-accrual loans:⁽¹⁾
Commercial and industrial	$	8,285		$	8,467		$	7,251		$	8,096		$	8,293
Commercial real estate	24,850			22,098			26,379			32,507			26,909
Construction	5,144			5,223			6,578			6,534			6,569
Residential mortgage	17,127			17,760			17,305			19,190			20,720
Consumer	2,138			2,209			2,380			2,106			2,149
Total non-accrual loans	57,544			55,757			59,893			68,433			64,640
Non-performing loans held for sale	—			7,130			7,350			7,850			27,329
Other real estate owned (OREO)⁽²⁾	13,184			14,249			15,534			14,984			16,674
Other repossessed assets	477			1,232			1,260			1,104			1,995
Non-accrual debt securities ⁽³⁾	2,030			4,729			4,725			4,527			3,963
Total non-performing assets (NPAs)	$	73,235		$	83,097		$	88,762		$	96,898		$	114,601
Performing troubled debt restructured loans	$	100,524		$	97,743		$	107,134		$	108,538		$	114,668
Total non-accrual loans as a % of loans	0.42		%	0.41		%	0.49		%	0.58		%	0.55		%
Total NPAs as a % of loans and NPAs	0.53			0.61			0.72			0.81			0.97
Total accruing past due and non-accrual loans as a % of loans	0.71			0.65			0.75			0.88			0.92
Allowance for losses on non-covered loans as a % of non-accrual loans	178.00			183.21			169.90			148.97			154.14


(1)	Past due loans and non-accrual loans exclude PCI loans that are accounted for on a pool basis.


(2)	This table excludes covered OREO properties related to FDIC-assisted transactions totaling $8.6 million, $9.2 million, $6.2 million, $11.2 million and $11.6 million at March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, September 30, 2014, June 30, 2014 and March 31, 2014, respectively.


(3)	Includes other-than-temporarily impaired trust preferred securities classified as available for sale, which are presented at carrying value, net of net unrealized losses totaling $723 thousand, $621 thousand, $625 thousand, $823 thousand, $1.4 million at March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, September 30, 2014, June 30, 2014 and March 31, 2014, respectively.

Total NPAs decreased $9.9 million to $73.2 million at March 31, 2015 from December 31, 2014 largely due to the sale of one non-performing commercial real estate loan held for sale during the first quarter of 2015 (discussed further below).

Loans past due 30 to 59 days increased $11.0 million to $31.2 million at March 31, 2015 as compared to December 31, 2014 mostly due to increases of $6.3 million, $6.1 million and $2.8 million million in the residential mortgage, construction and commercial and industrial loans, respectively, partially offset by a $4.2 million decrease in commercial real estate loans. The decrease within the commercial real estate loan category was mostly related to the migration of a $4.0 million potential problem loan reported at December 31, 2014 to non-accrual loans at March 31, 2015. Construction loans and commercial real estate loans past due 30 to 59 days totaling $6.6 million and $4.8 million at March 31, 2015, respectively, include $4.6 million and $175 thousand of performing matured loan in the normal process of renewal, respectively.

Loans past due 60 to 89 days decreased $1.0 million to $4.6 million at March 31, 2015 as compared to December 31, 2014 mainly due to decreases of $1.8 million and $1.0 million in residential mortgage loans and the commercial and industrial loan delinquencies, respectively, partially offset by a $1.8 million increase in commercial real estate loans in this category. The $1.8 million increase in commercial real estate loans past due 60 to 89 days is due, in part, to one potential problem loan totaling $1.1 million at March 31, 2015.

Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing decreased $1.7 million to $3.8 million at March 31, 2015 compared to $5.5 million at December 31, 2014. Within this past due category, construction loans decreased $4.0 million entirely due to a $4.0 million potential problem loan reported in this category at December 31, 2014 that was current to all contractual payments at March 31, 2015. The decrease in loans past due 90 days or more was partially offset by a $2.7 million increase in the commercial real estate loan category due to one performing matured loan in the normal process of renewal at March 31, 2015.

Non-accrual loans decreased $1.8 million to $57.5 million at March 31, 2015 as compared to $55.8 million at December 31, 2014 mainly due to a $2.8 million increase within the commercial real estate loan category partly caused by the aforementioned $4.0 million potential problem loan that migrated from loans past due 30 to 59 days reported at December 31, 2014. All other non-accrual loan categories moderately declined during the first quarter of 2015.

We reported no non-performing loans held for sale at March 31, 2015 as compared to one commercial real estate loan totaling $7.1 million at December 31, 2014. The non-performing loan was sold during the first quarter of 2015 and, as a result, we recognized an immaterial gain as a component of the net gains on sales of loans category of non-interest income.

OREO properties decreased $1.1 million to $13.2 million at March 31, 2015 from $14.2 million at December 31, 2014 primarily due to sales activity during the first quarter of 2015. Our residential mortgage loan foreclosure activity remains low due to the nominal amount of individual loan delinquencies within the residential mortgage and home equity portfolios and the average time to complete a foreclosure in the State of New Jersey, which currently exceeds two and a half years. The residential mortgage and consumer loans secured by residential real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings are in process totaled $14.4 million at March 31, 2015. Although we have experienced an increase in the amount of foreclosures working through the courts, we believe this

lengthy legal process negatively impacts the level of our non-accrual loans, NPAs, and the ability to compare our NPA levels to similar banks located outside of our primary markets.

Non-accrual debt securities decreased $2.7 million to $2.0 million at March 31, 2015 as compared to $4.7 million at December 31, 2014. The decline was largely due to the sale of a previously impaired pooled trust preferred security, which resulted in a realized gain of $364 thousand during the first quarter of 2015.

Troubled debt restructured loans (TDRs) represent loan modifications for customers experiencing financial difficulties where a concession has been granted. Performing TDRs (i.e., TDRs not reported as loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing or as non-accrual loans) totaled $100.5 million at March 31, 2015 and consisted of 105 loans (primarily in the commercial and industrial loan and commercial real estate portfolios). On an aggregate basis, the $100.5 million in performing TDRs at March 31, 2015 had a modified weighted average interest rate of approximately 4.69 percent as compared to a pre-modification weighted average interest rate of 5.03 percent.

Allowance for Credit Losses

The allowance for credit losses consists of the allowance for losses on non-covered loans, the allowance for unfunded letters of credit, and the allowance for losses on covered loans related to credit impairment of certain covered loan pools subsequent to acquisition. Management maintains the allowance for credit losses at a level estimated to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio and unfunded letters of credit commitments at the balance sheet dates, based on ongoing evaluations of the loan portfolio. Our methodology for evaluating the appropriateness of the allowance for non-covered loans includes:


•	segmentation of the loan portfolio based on the major loan categories, which consist of commercial, commercial real estate (including construction), residential mortgage and other consumer loans (including automobile and home equity loans);


•	tracking the historical levels of classified loans and delinquencies;


•	assessing the nature and trend of loan charge-offs;


•	providing specific reserves on impaired loans;


•	evaluating the non-covered PCI loan pools for additional credit impairment subsequent to the acquisition dates; and


•	applying economic outlook factors, assigning specific incremental reserves where necessary.

Additionally, the volume of non-performing loans, concentration risks by size, type, and geography, new markets, collateral adequacy, credit policies and procedures, staffing, underwriting consistency, loan review and economic conditions are taken into consideration when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. Allowance for credit losses methodology and accounting policy are fully described in Part II, Item 7 and Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in Valley’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

While management utilizes its best judgment and information available, the ultimate adequacy of the allowance for credit losses is dependent upon a variety of factors largely beyond our control, including the view of the OCC toward loan classifications, performance of the loan portfolio, and the economy. The OCC may require, based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination, that certain loan balances be charged off or require that adjustments be made to the allowance for loan losses when their credit evaluations differ from those of management.

The table below summarizes the relationship among loans, loans charged-off, loan recoveries, the provision for credit losses and the allowance for credit losses for the periods indicated.



	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014			March 31, 2014
	($ in thousands)
Average loans outstanding	$	13,569,031		$	13,042,303		$	11,617,597
Beginning balance - Allowance for credit losses	$	104,287		$	104,559		$	117,112
Loans charged-off ^*:
Commercial and industrial	(753		)	(916		)	(8,614		)
Commercial real estate	(77		)	—			(3,851		)
Construction	(73		)	(2,767		)	(639		)
Residential mortgage	(49		)	(489		)	(63		)
Consumer	(714		)	(1,391		)	(1,072		)
	(1,666		)	(5,563		)	(14,239		)
Charged-off loans recovered :
Commercial and industrial	1,051			720			544
Commercial real estate	23			279			1,337
Construction	437			—			—
Residential mortgage	114			4			79
Consumer	319			308			422
	1,944			1,311			2,382
Net charge-offs	278			(4,252		)	(11,857		)
Provision charged for credit losses	—			3,980			3,998
Ending balance - Allowance for credit losses	$	104,565		$	104,287		$	109,253
Components of allowance for credit losses:
Allowance for non-covered loans	$	102,431		$	102,153		$	99,639
Allowance for covered loans	200			200			7,070
Allowance for loan losses	102,631			102,353			106,709
Allowance for unfunded letters of credit	1,934			1,934			2,544
Allowance for credit losses	$	104,565		$	104,287		$	109,253
Components of provision for credit losses:
Provision for losses on non-covered loans	$	—		$	4,368		$	4,949
Provision for losses on covered loans	—			(201		)	—
Provision for loan losses	—			4,167			4,949
Provision for unfunded letters of credit	—			(187		)	(951		)
Provision for credit losses	$	—		$	3,980		$	3,998

Ratio of net charge-offs of non-covered loans to average loans outstanding	(0.01		)%	0.12		%	0.41		%
Ratio of total net charge-offs to average loans outstanding	(0.01		)	0.13			0.41
Allowance for non-covered loan losses as a % of non-covered loans	0.76			0.77			0.86
Allowance for credit losses as a % of total loans	0.76			0.77			0.93


*	Includes covered commercial and industrial loan charge-offs of $277 thousand for the three months ended December 31, 2014. There were no covered loan charge-offs during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

For the first quarter of 2015, we recognized net non-covered loan recoveries of $278 thousand as compared to net loan charge-offs on non-covered loans totaling $4.3 million and $11.9 million for the fourth quarter of 2014 and first quarter of 2014, respectively. The net recoveries during the first quarter largely resulted from lower gross loan charge-offs in most loan categories as compared to the fourth quarter of 2014, and charge-off recoveries largely driven by recoveries from one commercial and industrial loan and one construction loan totaling a combined $1.1 million.

For the covered loan pools, we recorded no net charge-offs of covered loans during the first quarters of 2015 and 2014 as compared to $277 thousand of net charge-offs recognized in the fourth quarter of 2014. Charge-offs on covered loan pools, when incurred, are substantially covered by loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC.

During the first quarter of 2015, we recorded no provision for losses on non-covered loans and unfunded letters of credit as compared to a $4.2 million provision for the fourth quarter of 2014 and a $4.0 million provision for the first quarter of 2014. The decline in the provision from the linked quarter is due to several factors, including, but not limited to, the continued positive trends in our net loan charge-offs in most loan categories since 2013, loan collateral values, as well as our outlook for the loan portfolio's credit quality and the economy.

During the first quarters of 2015 and 2014, we recorded no provision for losses on covered loans as compared to a negative provision totaling $201 thousand during the fourth quarter of 2014 related to decreases in the estimated additional credit impairment of certain loan pools subsequent to acquisition.

The following table summarizes the allocation of the allowance for credit losses to specific loan portfolio categories and the allocations as a percentage of each loan category:



	March 31, 2015				December 31, 2014				March 31, 2014
	Allowance Allocation		Allocation as a % of Loan Category		Allowance Allocation		Allocation as a % of Loan Category		Allowance Allocation		Allocation as a % of Loan Category
	($ in thousands)
Loan Category:
Commercial and Industrial loans*	$	46,657	1.98	%	$	45,440	2.03	%	$	51,965	2.57	%
Commercial real estate loans:
Commercial real estate	26,335		0.43	%	27,426		0.45	%	22,951		0.45	%
Construction	15,321		2.84	%	15,414		2.91	%	8,999		2.17	%
Total commercial real estate loans	41,656		0.63	%	42,840		0.65	%	31,950		0.58	%
Residential mortgage loans	4,062		0.16	%	5,063		0.20	%	6,856		0.28	%
Consumer loans:
Home equity	1,588		0.33	%	1,200		0.24	%	1,047		0.24	%
Auto and other consumer	3,384		0.23	%	3,979		0.27	%	3,056		0.26	%
Total consumer loans	4,972		0.25	%	5,179		0.27	%	4,103		0.25	%
Unallocated	7,018		—		5,565		—		7,309		—
Allowance for non-covered loans and unfunded letters of credit	104,365		0.77	%	104,087		0.78	%	102,183		0.88	%
Allowance for covered loans	200		0.11	%	200		0.09	%	7,070		8.74	%
Total allowance for credit losses	$	104,565	0.76	%	$	104,287	0.77	%	$	109,253	0.93	%



*	Includes the reserve for unfunded letters of credit.

The allowance for non-covered loans and unfunded letters of credit as a percentage of total non-covered loans was 0.77 percent at March 31, 2015 as compared to 0.78 percent and 0.88 percent at December 31, 2014 and March 31, 2014,

respectively. At March 31, 2015, our allowance allocations for losses as a percentage of total loans in most loan categories moderately declined or did not significantly change as compared to December 31, 2014 due to our portfolio's credit quality and favorable economic outlook for our primary markets. Overall, total loan delinquencies and internally classified loans remained at acceptable levels of total loans at March 31, 2015, while we also experienced a low level of loan charge-offs resulting in a modest net loan recovery during the first quarter of 2015. The first quarter net recoveries continued the positive trend in loan loss experience seen in 2014, where net loan charge-offs were at the lowest level reported since 2007. These items as well as several other factors positively impacted our estimate of the allowance for credit losses at March 31, 2015.

Our allowance for non-covered loans and unfunded letters of credit as a percentage of total non-covered loans (excluding non-covered PCI loans with carrying values totaling approximately $1.5 billion) was 0.86 percent at March 31, 2015 as compared to 0.89 percent at December 31, 2014. PCI loans, including all of the loans recently acquired from 1st United during the fourth quarter of 2014, are accounted for on a pool basis and initially recorded net of fair valuation discounts related to credit which may be used to absorb future losses on such loans before any allowance for loan losses is recognized subsequent to acquisition. Due to the adequacy of such discounts, there were no allowance reserves related to non-covered PCI loans at March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014 and March 31, 2014.

Management believes that the unallocated allowance is appropriate given the uncertain strength of the economic and housing market recoveries, the size of the loan portfolio and level of loan delinquencies at March 31, 2015.

Loan Repurchase Contingencies

We engage in the origination of residential mortgages for sale into the secondary market. In connection with loan sales, we make representations and warranties, which, if breached, may require us to repurchase such loans, substitute other loans or indemnify the purchasers of such loans for actual losses incurred due to such loans. However, the performance of our loans sold has been historically strong due to our strict underwriting standards and procedures. Over the past several years, we have experienced a nominal amount of repurchase requests, only a few of which have actually resulted in repurchases by Valley (only two loan repurchases in 2014 and none in 2015). None of the loan repurchases resulted in losses. Accordingly, no reserves pertaining to loans sold were established on our consolidated financial statements at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014. See Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors - “We may incur future losses in connection with repurchases and indemnification payments related to mortgages that we have sold into the secondary market” of Valley’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 for additional information.

Capital Adequacy

A significant measure of the strength of a financial institution is its shareholders’ equity. Our shareholders’ equity totaled approximately $1.9 billion at both March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, and represented 9.8 percent and 9.9 percent of total assets at each of the respective dates. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, total shareholders’ equity increased $4.1 million, which was comprised of (i) net income of $30.3 million, (ii) a $1.2 million increase in net proceeds from the re-issuance of 120 thousand shares of treasury stock or authorized common shares issued under our dividend reinvestment plan, and (iii) a $400 thousand increase attributable to the effect of our stock incentive plan, partially offset by cash dividends declared on common stock totaling $25.6 million and a $2.2 million increase in our accumulated other comprehensive loss. See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding changes in our accumulated other comprehensive loss during the three months ended March 31, 2015.

Valley and Valley National Bank are subject to the regulatory capital requirements administered by the Federal Reserve Bank and the OCC. Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require Valley and Valley National Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of common equity Tier 1 capital, total and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, and Tier 1 capital to average assets, as defined in the regulations. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, Valley exceeded all capital adequacy requirements to which it was subject (see tables below).

On January 1, 2015, the final rules implementing the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision capital guidelines for banking organizations (Basel III) regulatory capital framework and related Dodd-Frank Act changes became effective for Valley. These rules supersede the federal banking agencies' general risk-based capital rules (Basel I). Full compliance with all of the final rule's requirements is phased in over a multi-year transition period ending on January 1, 2019. Basel III revises minimum capital requirements and adjust prompt corrective action thresholds. Under the final rules, minimum requirements increased for both the quantity and quality of capital held by Valley and the Bank. The rules include a new common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 4.5 percent, raise the minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets from 4.0 percent to 6.0 percent, require a minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets of 8.0 percent, and require a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0 percent. A new capital conservation buffer, comprised of common equity Tier 1 capital, is also established above the regulatory minimum capital requirements. This conservation buffer will be phased in beginning January 1, 2016 at 0.625 percent of risk-weighted assets and increase each subsequent year by an additional 0.625 percent until reaching its final level of 2.5 percent of risk-weighted assets on January 1, 2019. The final rule also revise the definition and calculation of Tier 1 capital, total capital and risk-weighted assets.

The following table presents Valley’s and Valley National Bank’s actual capital positions and ratios under risk-based capital guidelines of Basel III at March 31, 2015.



	Basel III*
	Actual				Minimum Capital Requirements				To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provision
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount	Ratio
	($ in thousands)
As of March 31, 2015
Total Risk-based Capital
Valley	$	1,569,881	11.4	%	$	1,106,864	8.0	%	$ N/A	N/A%
Valley National Bank	1,498,464		10.8		1,105,700		8.0		1,382,124	10.0
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital
Valley	1,307,316		9.5		622,611		4.5		N/A	N/A
Valley National Bank	1,393,899		10.1		621,956		4.5		898,381	6.5
Tier 1 Risk-based Capital
Valley	1,307,316		9.5		830,148		6.0		N/A	N/A
Valley National Bank	1,393,899		10.1		829,275		6.0		1,105,700	8.0
Tier 1 Leverage Capital
Valley	1,307,316		7.2		729,828		4.0		N/A	N/A
Valley National Bank	1,393,899		7.7		729,134		4.0		911,418	5.0

_______

* March 31, 2015 capital positions and ratios were calculated under Basel III rules which became effective January 1, 2015.

The following table presents Valley’s and Valley National Bank’s actual capital positions and ratios under risk-based capital guidelines of Basel I at December 31, 2014.



	Basel I
	Actual				Minimum Capital Requirements				To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provision
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount	Ratio
	($ in thousands)
As of December 31, 2014
Total Risk-based Capital
Valley	$	1,547,753	11.4	%	$	1,084,479	8.0	%	$ N/A	N/A%
Valley National Bank	1,481,184		10.9		1,083,516		8.0		1,354,395	10.0
Tier 1 Risk-based Capital
Valley	1,318,466		9.7		542,240		4.0		N/A	N/A
Valley National Bank	1,376,897		10.2		541,758		4.0		813,637	6.0
Tier 1 Leverage Capital
Valley	1,318,466		7.5		707,082		4.0		N/A	N/A
Valley National Bank	1,376,897		7.8		706,992		4.0		883,740	5.0

The Dodd-Frank Act requires federal banking agencies to issue regulations that require banks with total consolidated assets of more than $10.0 billion to conduct and publish company-run annual stress tests to assess the potential impact of different scenarios on the consolidated earnings and capital of each bank and certain related items over a nine-quarter forward-looking planning horizon, taking into account all relevant exposures and activities. On October 9, 2012, the FRB published final rules implementing the stress testing requirements for banks, such as the Company, with total consolidated assets of more than $10.0 billion but less than $50.0 billion. These rules set forth the timing and type of stress test activities, as well as rules governing controls, oversight and disclosure.

In March 2014, the FRB, OCC, and FDIC issued final supervisory guidance for these stress tests. This joint final supervisory guidance discusses supervisory expectations for stress test practices, provides examples of practices that would be consistent with those expectations, and offers additional details about stress test methodologies. It also emphasizes the importance of stress testing as an ongoing risk management practice.

We submitted our latest stress testing results (utilizing data as of December 31, 2014 and projecting over an eight-quarter horizon as instructed by our primary regulators due to the acquisition of 1st United in the fourth quarter of 2014) to the FRB and the OCC on March 31, 2015. We are also required to make our first stress test-related public disclosure, utilizing data as of December 31, 2014, between June 15 and June 30, 2015.

Tangible book value is computed by dividing shareholders’ equity less goodwill and other intangible assets by common shares outstanding as follows:



	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
	($ in thousands, except for share data)
Common shares outstanding	232,428,108		232,110,975
Shareholders’ equity	$	1,867,153	$	1,863,017
Less: Goodwill and other intangible assets	612,558		614,667
Tangible shareholders’ equity	$	1,254,595	$	1,248,350
Tangible book value per common share	$	5.40	$	5.38
Book value per common share	$	8.03	$	8.03

Management believes the tangible book value per common share ratio provides information useful to management and investors in understanding our underlying operational performance, our business and performance trends and facilitates comparisons with the performance of others in the financial services industry. This non-GAAP financial measure should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for or superior to financial measures calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP. This non-GAAP financial measure may also be calculated differently from similar measures disclosed by other companies.

Typically, our primary source of capital growth is through retention of earnings. Our rate of earnings retention is derived by dividing undistributed earnings per common share by earnings (or net income) per common share. Our retention ratio was 15.4 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2015 as compared to 21.6 percent for the year ended December 31, 2014. Our rate of earnings retention for the first quarter of 2015 was negatively impacted by higher operating expenses incurred prior to the systems integration completed in February 2015 related to the 1st United acquisition. We expect our synergies realized from the integration of 1st United's back office operations and potential future loan growth (in all of our primary lending markets) will help increase our future retention rate.

Cash dividends declared amounted to $0.11 per common share for both the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014. The Board is committed to examine and weigh relevant facts and considerations, including its commitment to shareholder value, each time it makes a cash dividend decision in this economic environment. The Federal Reserve has cautioned all bank holding companies about distributing dividends which may reduce the level of capital or not allow capital to grow in light of the new higher capital levels as required under the new Basel III rules.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations and Other Matters

For a discussion of Valley’s off-balance sheet arrangements and contractual obligations see information included in Valley’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 in the MD&A section -“Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements” and Notes 12, 13 and 14 to the consolidated financial statements included in this report.



Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risk refers to potential losses arising from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity prices, and commodity prices. Valley’s market risk is composed primarily of interest rate risk. See page 60 for a discussion of interest rate sensitivity.



Item 4.	Controls and Procedures

Valley’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), with the assistance of other members of Valley’s management, have evaluated the effectiveness of Valley’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on such evaluation, Valley’s CEO and CFO have concluded that Valley’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Valley’s CEO and CFO have also concluded that there have not been any changes in Valley’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Valley’s internal control over financial reporting.

Valley’s management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, provides reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. The design of a control system reflects resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because there are inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within Valley have been or will be detected.

These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. There can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION



Item 1.	Legal Proceedings

In the normal course of business, we may be a party to various outstanding legal proceedings and claims. There have been no material changes in the legal proceedings previously disclosed under Part I, Item 3 of Valley’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.



Item 1A.	Risk Factors

There has been no material change in the risk factors previously disclosed under Part I, Item 1A of Valley’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.



Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

During the quarter, we did not sell any equity securities not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers during the three months ended March 31, 2015 were as follows:

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES



Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased (2)	Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans (1)	Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans (1)
January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015	67,002	$	9.61	—	4,112,465
February 1, 2015 to February 28, 2015	154,102	9.23		—	4,112,465
March 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015	1,578	9.59		—	4,112,465
Total	222,682	$	9.35	—


(1)	On January 17, 2007, Valley publicly announced its intention to repurchase up to 4.7 million outstanding common shares in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The repurchase plan has no stated expiration date. No repurchase plans or programs expired or terminated during the three months ended March 31, 2015.


(2)	Represents repurchases made in connection with the vesting of employee restricted stock awards.



Item 6.	Exhibits




(3)	Articles of Incorporation and By-laws:

	A.	Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 22, 2014.
	B.	Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.A to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 3, 2014.
	C.	By-laws of the Registrant, as amended, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 5, 2013.



(31.1)		Certification pursuant to Securities Exchange Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) signed by Gerald H. Lipkin, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.*
(31.2)		Certification pursuant to Securities Exchange Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) signed by Alan D. Eskow, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company.*
(32)		Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Gerald H. Lipkin, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Alan D. Eskow, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company.*
(101)		Interactive Data File *



*	Filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.




				VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP
				(Registrant)

Date: May 8, 2015				/s/ Gerald H. Lipkin
				Gerald H. Lipkin
				Chairman of the Board, President
				and Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 8, 2015				/s/ Alan D. Eskow
				Alan D. Eskow
				Senior Executive Vice President and
				Chief Financial Officer