Filed Pursuant to 424b(2)

Registration No. 333-137697

 

 

PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT (To Prospectus dated September 29, 2006)

 

4,000,000 Common Units

Representing Limited Partner Interests

 

 

Teekay LNG Partners L.P.

 

$17.60 per common unit

 

 

 

We are selling 4,000,000 of our common units, representing limited partner interests. We have granted the underwriters an option to purchase up to 600,000 additional common units to cover over-allotments, if any.

 

Our common units are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “TGP.” The last reported sale price of our common units on the New York Stock Exchange on March 24, 2009 was $18.24 per common unit.

 

Investing in our common units involves risks. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page S-9 of this prospectus supplement and page 7 of the accompanying prospectus before you make an investment in our common units.

 

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus supplement or the accompanying prospectus are truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 

The underwriters expect to deliver the common units on or about March 30, 2009.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The date of this prospectus supplement is March 25, 2009.

 

This document is in two parts. The first part is this prospectus supplement, which describes the specific terms of this offering of common units. The second part is the accompanying prospectus, which gives more general information, some of which may not apply to this offering of common units. Generally, when we refer to the “prospectus,” we refer to both parts combined. If information varies between this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus, you should rely on the information in this prospectus supplement.

 

You should rely only on the information contained or incorporated by reference in this prospectus or any “free writing prospectus” we may authorize to be delivered to you. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with different information. If anyone provides you with additional, different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. You should not assume that the information contained in this prospectus or any “free writing prospectus” we may authorize to be delivered to you, as well as the information we previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, that is incorporated by reference herein, is accurate as of any date other than its respective date. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since such dates.

 

We are offering to sell the common units, and are seeking offers to buy the common units, only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are permitted. The distribution of this prospectus and the offering of the common units in certain jurisdictions may be restricted by law. Persons outside the United States who come into possession of this prospectus must inform themselves about and observe any restrictions relating to the offering of the common units and the distribution of this prospectus outside the United States. This prospectus does not constitute, and may not be used in connection with, an offer or solicitation by anyone in any jurisdiction in which such offer or solicitation is not authorized or in which the person making such offer or solicitation is not qualified to do so or to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such offer or solicitation.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form F-3 regarding the securities covered by this prospectus. This prospectus does not contain all of the information found in the registration statement. For further information regarding us and the securities offered in this prospectus, you may wish to review the full registration statement, including its exhibits. In addition, we file annual, quarterly and other reports with and furnish information to the SEC. You may inspect and copy any document we file with or furnish to the SEC at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of this material can also be obtained upon written request from the Public Reference Section of the SEC at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549, at prescribed rates or from the SEC’s web site on the Internet at www.sec.gov free of charge. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on public reference rooms. You can also obtain information about us at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange, Inc., 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005.

 

As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt under the Securities Exchange Act from, among other things, certain rules prescribing the furnishing and content of proxy statements, and our executive officers, directors and principal unitholders are exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions contained in Section 16 of the Exchange Act. In addition, we are not required under the Exchange Act to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as U.S. companies whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act, including the filing of quarterly reports or current reports on Form 8-K. However, we intend to make available quarterly reports containing our unaudited interim financial information for the first three fiscal quarters of each fiscal year.

 

The SEC allows us to “incorporate by reference” information that we file with the SEC. This means that we can disclose important information to you without actually including the specific information in this prospectus by referring you to other documents filed separately with the SEC. The information incorporated by reference is an important part of this prospectus. Information that we later provide to the SEC, and which is deemed to be “filed” with the SEC, automatically will update information previously filed with the SEC, and may replace information in this prospectus.

 

We incorporate by reference into this prospectus the documents listed below:

 

 

These reports contain important information about us, our financial condition and our results of operations.

You may obtain any of the documents incorporated by reference in this prospectus from the SEC through its public reference facilities or its website at the addresses provided above. You also may request a copy of any document incorporated by reference in this prospectus (excluding any exhibits to those documents, unless the exhibit is specifically incorporated by reference in this document), at no cost by visiting our internet website at www.teekaylng.com, or by writing or calling us at the following address:

 

Teekay LNG Partners L.P.

4^th Floor, Belvedere Building

69 Pitts Bay Road

Hamilton, HM 08, Bermuda

Attn: Corporate Secretary

(441) 298-2530

 

You should rely only on the information incorporated by reference or provided in this prospectus or any prospectus supplement. We have not authorized anyone else to provide you with any information. You should not assume that the information incorporated by reference or provided in this prospectus or any prospectus supplement is accurate as of any date other than the date on the front of each document. The information contained in our website is not part of this prospectus.

 

All statements, other than statements of historical fact, included in or incorporated by reference into this prospectus are forward-looking statements. In addition, we and our representatives may from time to time make other oral or written statements that are also forward-looking statements. Such statements include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies, business prospects, changes and trends in our business, and the markets in which we operate. In some cases, you can identify the forward-looking statements by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “forecast,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “propose,” “potential,” “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. Forward-looking statements include statements with respect to, among other things, those set forth in the section titled “Material Tax Considerations” in this prospectus supplement, including with respect to the ratio of taxable income to distributions.

 

These and other forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those risks discussed in “Risk Factors” set forth in the prospectus and those risks discussed in other reports we file with the SEC and that are incorporated in this prospectus by reference, including our Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 and our Report on Form 6-K for the quarter ended September 30, 2008. The risks, uncertainties and assumptions involve known and unknown risks and are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control.

 

Forward-looking statements are made based upon management’s current plans, expectations, estimates, assumptions and beliefs concerning future events affecting us and, therefore, involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including those risks discussed in “Risk Factors” and otherwise incorporated into this prospectus. We caution that forward-looking statements are not guarantees and that actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements.

 

We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of these factors. Further, we cannot assess the effect of each such factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to be materially different from those contained in any forward-looking statement.

 

SUMMARY

	•	Acquire new LNG and LPG carriers built to project specifications after long-term, fixed-rate time charters have been awarded for the LNG and LPG projects.  Our LNG and LPG carriers were built or will be built to customer specifications included in the related long-term, fixed-rate time charters for the vessels. We intend to continue our practice of acquiring LNG and LPG carriers as needed for approved projects only after the long-term, fixed-rate time charters for the projects have been awarded, rather than ordering vessels on a speculative basis. We believe this approach is preferable to speculative newbuilding because it:

	•	eliminates the risk of incremental or duplicative expenditures to alter our LNG and LPG carriers to meet customer specifications;
	•	facilitates the financing of new LNG and LPG carriers based on their anticipated future revenues; and
	•	ensures that new vessels will be employed upon acquisition, which should generate more stable cash flow.

	•	Expand our LNG and LPG operations globally.  We seek to capitalize on opportunities emerging from the global expansion of the LNG and LPG sector by selectively targeting:

	•	long-term, fixed-rate time charters wherever there is significant growth in LNG and LPG trade;
	•	joint ventures and partnerships with companies that may provide increased access to opportunities in attractive LNG and LPG importing and exporting geographic regions; and
	•	strategic vessel and business acquisitions.

	•	Provide superior customer service by maintaining high reliability, safety, environmental and quality standards.  LNG and LPG project operators seek LNG and LPG transportation partners that have a reputation for high reliability, safety, environmental and quality standards. We seek to leverage our own and Teekay Corporation’s operational expertise to create a sustainable competitive advantage with consistent delivery of superior customer service.
	•	Manage our Suezmax tanker fleet to provide stable cash flows.  The remaining terms for our existing long-term Suezmax tanker charters are 7 to 17 years. We believe the fixed-rate time charters for our oil tanker fleet provide us stable cash flows during their terms and a source of funding for expanding our LNG and LPG operations. Depending on prevailing market conditions during and at the end of each existing charter, we may seek to extend the charter, enter into a new charter, operate the vessel on the spot market or sell the vessel, in an effort to maximize returns on our Suezmax fleet while managing residual risk.

Issuer		Teekay LNG Partners L.P.
Common units offered by us		4,000,000 common units.
		4,600,000 common units if the underwriters exercise in full their option to purchase up to an additional 600,000 common units to cover any over-allotments.
Units outstanding after this offering		37,338,320 common units and 11,050,929 subordinated units. 37,938,320 common units and 11,050,929 subordinated units, if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full.
Use of proceeds		We will use the net proceeds of approximately $68.5 million from this offering, including our general partner’s related capital contribution, for the repayment of outstanding debt under one of our revolving credit facilities.
Estimated ratio of taxable income to distributions		We estimate that if you hold the common units you purchase in this offering through December 31, 2011 you will be allocated, on a cumulative basis, an amount of U.S. federal taxable income for that period that will be 30% or less of the cash distributed to you with respect to that period. For a discussion of the basis for this estimate and of factors that may affect our ability to achieve this estimate, please read “Material Tax Considerations — Ratio of Taxable Income to Distributions.”
New York Stock Exchange Symbol		TGP

 

Before investing in our common units, you should carefully consider all of the information included or incorporated by reference into this prospectus. Although many of our business risks are comparable to those of a corporation engaged in a similar business, limited partner interests are inherently different from the capital stock of a corporation. When evaluating an investment in our common units, you should carefully consider those risks discussed under the caption “Risk Factors” beginning on page 7 of the accompanying prospectus, as well as the discussion of risk factors beginning on page 13 of our Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 and the discussion of risk factors beginning on page 41 of our Current Report on Form 6-K for the period ended September 30, 2008, which are incorporated by reference into this prospectus. If any of these risks were to occur, our business, financial condition or operating results could be materially adversely affected. In that case, our ability to pay distributions on our common units may be reduced, the trading price of our common units could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment. In addition we are subject to the following risks and uncertainties.

 

Some of our subsidiaries are classified as corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes, which could result in additional tax.

 

Our subsidiaries Arctic Spirit LLC and Polar Spirit LLC, which own the two Kenai LNG carriers, are classified as corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As such, if these subsidiaries (and any other subsidiary classified as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) fail to qualify for an exemption from U.S. federal income tax on the U.S. source portion of our income attributable to transportation that begins or ends (but not both) in the United States, the subsidiaries may be subject to U.S. federal income tax on such income. The imposition of this tax would result in decreased cash available for distribution to common unitholders. Please read “Material Tax Considerations — Taxation of the Partnership.”

 

In addition, these subsidiaries could be treated as passive foreign investment companies (or PFICs) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. U.S. shareholders of a PFIC are subject to an adverse U.S. federal income tax regime with respect to the income derived by the PFIC, the distributions they receive from the PFIC, and the gain, if any, they derive from the sale or other disposition of their interests in the PFIC. For a discussion of the consequences of possible PFIC classification on our unitholders, please read “Material Tax Considerations — Consequences of Possible PFIC Classification.”

 

The Internal Revenue Service (or IRS) may challenge the manner in which we value our assets in determining the amount of income, gain, loss and deduction allocable to the unitholders, which could adversely affect the value of the common units.

 

A unitholder’s taxable income or loss with respect to a common unit each year will depend upon a number of factors, including the nature and fair market value of our assets at the time the holder acquired the common unit, whether we issue additional units or whether we engage in certain other transactions, and the manner in which our items of income, gain, loss and deduction are allocated among our partners. For this purpose, we determine the value of our assets and the relative amounts of our items of income, gain, loss and deduction allocable to our unitholders and our general partner as holder of the incentive distribution rights by reference to the value of our interests, including the incentive distribution rights. The IRS may challenge any valuation determinations that we make, particularly as to the incentive distribution rights, for which there is no public market. Moreover, the IRS could challenge certain other aspects of the manner in which we determine the relative allocations made to our unitholders and to the general partner as holder of our incentive distribution rights.

 

A successful IRS challenge to our valuation or allocation methods could increase the amount of net taxable income and gain realized by a unitholder with respect to a common unit. Any such IRS challenge, whether or not successful, could adversely affect the value of our common units.

If we do not receive a favorable ruling from the IRS related to the type of structure we propose to use for certain of our LPG operations, we may recognize additional non-qualifying income from our LPG operations. Because we also plan to use the same structure for certain of our LNG operations, we may also receive less cash flow than expected from these LNG operations, or none at all, if we do not receive the ruling.

 

We anticipate that the LPG carriers acquired from I.M. Skaugen ASA will be held by a foreign subsidiary classified as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes that is wholly owned by a U.S. partnership. We have requested a ruling from the IRS that would cause this foreign subsidiary not to be classified as PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If we do not receive a favorable ruling from the IRS, we anticipate that we would operate the LPG carriers in a pass-through structure rather than a corporation, and thereby avoid PFIC status for those vessels. Doing so would increase the amount of our non-qualifying income for purposes of determining our status as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, but we do not anticipate that the amount of this non-qualifying income would be sufficient to jeopardize such status. Please read “Material Tax Considerations — Taxation of the Partnership — Classification as a Partnership.”

 

If we receive a favorable ruling with respect to the LPG carrier structure, we anticipate that we will use the same structure to acquire and hold the carriers servicing the Tangguh LNG project. If we do not receive a favorable ruling, we believe placing the Tangguh LNG carriers in a pass-through structure could jeopardize our status as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes due to the nature of their charter agreements and the amount of income they generate. Please read “Material Tax Considerations — Taxation of the Partnership — Classification as a Partnership.” In order to preserve our status as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, in the event we do not receive a favorable ruling, we would (1) seek to restructure the project, which may provide us less benefit than we originally anticipated or (2) require certain tax elections to be made by unitholders to avoid adverse tax consequences of this subsidiary being treated as a PFIC. For a discussion of the consequences of possible PFIC classification on our unitholders, please read “Material Tax Considerations — Consequences of Possible PFIC Classification.” If any of these alternatives are not satisfactory to us, we may not acquire Teekay Corporation’s interest in the two LNG carriers and related charters. In that case, we would not receive the cash flow we currently expect to receive from this project.

 

The continuation of recent economic conditions, including disruptions in the global credit markets, could adversely affect our ability to grow.

 

The recent economic downturn and financial crisis in the global markets have produced illiquidity in the capital markets, market volatility, heightened exposure to interest rate and credit risks and reduced access to capital markets. If this economic downturn continues, we may face restricted access to the capital markets or bank lending, which may make it more difficult and costly to fund future growth. The decreased access to such resources could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

The recent economic downturn may affect our customers’ ability to charter our vessels and pay for our services and may adversely affect our business and results of operations.

 

The recent economic downturn in the global financial markets may lead to a decline in our customers’ operations or ability to pay for our services, which could result in decreased demand for our vessels and services. Our customer’s inability to pay could also result in their default on our current contracts and charters. The decline in the amount of services requested by our customers or their default on our contracts with them could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We cannot determine whether the difficult conditions in the economy and the financial markets will improve or worsen in the near future.

An impairment of goodwill could reduce our earnings.

 

At September 30, 2008, we had $35.6 million of goodwill recorded on our balance sheet. U.S. generally accepted accounting principles require us to test goodwill for impairment on an annual basis or when events or circumstances occur indicating that goodwill might be impaired. Due to the decline in market conditions, we conducted an interim impairment review of our reporting units during the third quarter of 2008 and it was determined that the fair value attributable to our Suezmax tanker reporting unit was less than its carrying value. As a result, a goodwill impairment loss of $3.6 million was recognized in the Suezmax tanker reporting unit during the third quarter. For the fourth quarter of 2008, we will again assess whether the decline in market conditions has caused any of our assets to be impaired and, if so, we would be required to take an immediate charge to earnings with a corresponding reduction of partners’ equity and increase in balance sheet leverage as measured by debt to total capitalization.

 

In 2008, we identified material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting and, as a result, we restated our financial statements and concluded that our internal control over financial reporting and our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of December 31, 2007. Although we believe we have fully remediated these material weaknesses, our auditors are currently auditing our financial statements and our internal controls and may conclude that as of December 31, 2008 we had not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting.

 

On December 2, 2008, we filed an Annual Report on Form 20-F/A to amend our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 and Form 6-K/A for the first quarter of 2008 in order to restate our previously reported financial results of operation, including results for 2003 through 2007 and the first quarter of 2008. For a more complete description of this restatement, please see our Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, including the “Explanatory Note” beginning on page 15 and “Item 15. Controls and Procedures” beginning on page 73.

 

The restatement adjusted our accounting treatment for derivative transactions, our accounting treatment for certain vessels we acquired from Teekay Corporation and our financial statement presentation of our interests in the RasGas 3 joint venture. The adjustments were all non-cash in nature and therefore affected net income but not our cash flows, liquidity or cash distributions to unitholders.

 

In connection with the restatement, we also reevaluated the assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures. Solely as a result of the material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting, we concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2007.

 

The audit of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the auditors’ evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting have not yet been completed. The steps we have taken to remediate the identified material weaknesses may prove ineffective and our independent auditors may conclude that as of December 31, 2008 we had not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting, which might have an adverse effect on the price of our common units.

 

If the IRS does not grant Teekay Holdings Limited’s request for an extension of time to make an election to be classified as a disregarded entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes we may not be able to continue to rely on the ruling we received from the IRS that our income derived from certain time charters is qualifying income under Section 7704(d) of the Internal Revenue Code and, as a result, there is greater uncertainty as to whether we will be classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes

 

If the IRS does not grant Teekay Holdings Limited’s request for an extension of time to make an election to be classified as a disregarded entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we will be considered, as of May 11, 2007, to have been terminated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and then to have been reconstituted as a new partnership. Please read “Material Tax Considerations — May 2007 Constructive Termination if IRS Does Not Grant Requested Ruling.” If we are considered to have been terminated, it is uncertain whether we could continue to rely on the ruling we received from the IRS that our income derived from certain time charters is qualifying income under Section 7704(d) of the IRC.

Because we may not be able to rely on such ruling, there is greater uncertainty as to whether we will be classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result, unless and until the IRS issues a favorable ruling to Teekay Holdings Limited, Perkins Coie LLP is no longer able to provide an opinion that we “will” be classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes; however, it will be providing an opinion that we “should” be characterized as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Please read “Material Tax Considerations — Classification as a Partnership” and “— Classification as a Corporation” for a discussion of the consequences to us and to unitholders of our being taxed as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

 

If we were treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, it would have to be determined whether we should be considered as a PFIC for such purposes. While we do not believe, based upon our current assets and operations, that we would be considered to be a PFIC even if we were treated as a corporation, there is a risk that the IRS would consider us to be a PFIC. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that the manner and extent of our operations would not change in the future such that we would be considered to be a PFIC for a future taxable year in which we were treated as a corporation.

 

U.S. shareholders of a PFIC are subject to an adverse U.S. federal income tax regime with respect to the income derived by the PFIC, the distributions they receive from the PFIC, and the gain, if any, they derive from the sale or other disposition of their interests in the PFIC. For a discussion of the consequences of possible PFIC classification on our unitholders, please read “Material Tax Considerations — Consequences of Possible PFIC Classification.”

 

We expect to receive net proceeds of approximately $68.5 million from the sale of common units we are offering, including from our general partners’ capital contribution to maintain its 2% general partner interest in us, after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated expenses payable by us. We expect to receive net proceeds of approximately $78.9 million if the underwriters’ option to acquire additional common units is exercised in full, including from our general partner’s related capital contribution.

 

We will use the net proceeds from our sale of common units covered by this prospectus and the capital contribution by our general partner for the repayment of outstanding debt under one of our revolving credit facilities, which has a fluctuating interest rate based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 0.50%. We borrowed $100 million on this facility in the fourth quarter of 2008 for working capital purposes. The credit facility matures on April 7, 2015. We anticipate being able to redraw the amount we repay on the facility in the future for any general partnership purpose or to fund acquisitions.

 

The following table sets forth our capitalization as of September 30, 2008 on an historical basis and on an as adjusted basis to give effect to this offering, the capital contribution by our general partner to maintain its 2% general partner interest in us, and the application of the net proceeds therefrom.

 

The historical data in the table is derived from and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, including accompanying notes, incorporated by reference in this prospectus. You should also read this table in conjunction with the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto, which are incorporated by reference herein from our Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.

 

 

 

 

Our common units were first offered on the New York Stock Exchange on May 5, 2005, at an initial price of $22.00 per unit. Our common units are listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “TGP.”

 

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing sales price per common unit, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange, and the amount of quarterly cash distributions declared per unit. The closing sales price of our common units on the New York Stock Exchange on March 24, 2009 was $18.24 per common unit.

 

 

 

 

The tax consequences to you of an investment in our common units will depend in part on your own tax circumstances. For a discussion of the principal U.S. federal income tax considerations and non-U.S. federal income tax considerations associated with our operations and the purchase, ownership and disposition of our common units, please read “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences,” beginning on page 58, and “Non-United States Tax Consequences,” beginning on page 75, of the accompanying base prospectus, which is incorporated by reference into this prospectus. You are urged to consult with your own tax advisor about the federal, state, local and foreign tax consequences peculiar to your circumstances. In addition to the discussion set forth in the accompanying base prospectus, please consider the following U.S. federal income tax consequences:

 

Taxation of the Partnership

 

Classification as a Partnership

 

For purposes of U.S. federal income taxation, a partnership is not a taxable entity, and although it may be subject to withholding taxes on behalf of its partners under certain circumstances, a partnership itself incurs no U.S. federal income tax liability. Instead, each partner of a partnership is required to take into account his share of items of income, gain, loss, deduction and credit of the partnership in computing his U.S. federal income tax liability, regardless of whether cash distributions are made to him by the partnership. Distributions by a partnership to a partner generally are not taxable unless the amount of cash distributed exceeds the partner’s adjusted tax basis in his partnership interest.

 

Section 7704 of the Internal Revenue Code (or IRC) provides that publicly traded partnerships, as a general rule, will be treated as corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, an exception, referred to as the “Qualifying Income Exception,” exists with respect to publicly traded partnerships whose “qualifying income” represents 90% or more of their gross income for every taxable year. Qualifying income includes income and gains derived from the transportation and storage of crude oil, natural gas and products thereof, including LNG. Other types of qualifying income include interest (other than from a financial business), dividends, gains from the sale of real property and gains from the sale or other disposition of capital assets held for the production of qualifying income, including stock. We have received a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (or IRS) that we requested in connection with our initial public offering that the income we derive from transporting LNG and crude oil pursuant to time charters existing at the time of our initial public offering is qualifying income within the meaning of Section 7704. A ruling from the IRS, while generally binding on the IRS, may under certain circumstances be revoked or modified by the IRS retroactively and may not apply if we experience a technical termination. Please read “— May 2007 Constructive Termination if IRS Does Not Grant the Requested Ruling.” As to income that is not covered by the IRS ruling (including income arising under the time charters existing at the time of our initial public offering if we experience a technical termination), we will rely upon the opinion of Perkins Coie LLP whether the income is qualifying income.

 

We estimate that less than 5% of our current income is not qualifying income; however, this estimate could change from time to time for various reasons. Because we have not received an IRS ruling or an opinion of counsel that (1) any income we derive from transporting LPG, petrochemical gases and ammonia pursuant to charters that we have entered into or will enter into in the future, (2) income we derive from transporting crude oil, natural gas and products thereof, including liquefied natural gas, pursuant to bareboat charters, or (3) income or gain we recognize from foreign currency transactions, is qualifying income, we are currently treating income from those sources as nonqualifying income. Under some circumstances, such as a significant change in foreign currency rates, the percentage of income or gain from foreign currency transactions or from interest rate swaps in relation to our total gross income could be substantial. We do not expect income or gains from these sources and other income or gains that are not qualifying income to constitute 10% or more of our gross income for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, it is possible that the operation of certain of our vessels pursuant to bareboat charters could, in the future, cause our non-qualifying income to constitute 10% or more of our future gross income if such

vessels were held in a pass-through structure. In order to preserve our status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, we have requested a ruling from the IRS that would effectively allow us to conduct our bareboat charter operations, as well as our LPG operations, in a subsidiary corporation. If we do not receive a favorable ruling from the IRS we will take such measures, as necessary, including restructuring our bareboat operations or having unitholders make certain tax elections to avoid adverse tax impacts, to preserve our status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes.

 

Perkins Coie LLP is of the opinion that, based upon the IRC, Treasury Regulations thereunder, published revenue rulings and court decisions, the IRS ruling and representations described below, we will be classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

 

In rendering its opinion, Perkins Coie LLP has relied on the following factual representations made by us and our general partner.

 

 

The foregoing opinion is based on the assumption that the IRS will grant Teekay Holdings Limited’s request for an extension of time to make an election to be classified as a disregarded entity. See “— May 2007 Constructive Termination if IRS Does Not Grant the Requested Ruling.” If the IRS does not grant the requested ruling, and if, as a result, we are unable to rely on the IRS ruling we received in connection with our initial public offering, Perkins Coie LLP is of the opinion that we should be classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, based on the authorities described above (other than the IRS ruling) and our representation that at least 90% of our gross income will be income of a type that Perkins Coie LLP has opined or will opine should be “qualifying income” within the meaning of Section 7704(d) of the IRC.

 

Classification as a Corporation

 

If we fail to meet the Qualifying Income Exception described previously with respect to our classification as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, other than a failure that is determined by the IRS to be inadvertent and that is cured within a reasonable time after discovery, we will be treated as a non-U.S. corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Our change in status would be deemed to have been effected by our transfer of all of our assets, subject to liabilities, to a newly formed non-U.S. corporation, in return for stock in that corporation, and then our distribution of that stock to our unitholders and other owners in liquidation of their interests in us.

 

If we were treated as a corporation in any taxable year, either as a result of a failure to meet the Qualifying Income Exception or otherwise, our items of income, gain, loss, deduction and credit would not pass through to unitholders. Instead, we would be subject to U.S. federal income tax based on the rules applicable to foreign corporations, not partnerships, and such items would be treated as our own.

 

Our subsidiaries Arctic Spirit LLC and Polar Spirit LLC are classified as corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes and are subject to U.S. federal income tax based on the rules applicable to foreign corporations.

 

We anticipate that, upon delivery of the LPG carriers from I.M. Skaugen ASA and the Tangguh LNG carriers (assuming we receive a favorable ruling from the IRS as discussed above), we will hold these vessels in a subsidiary that will be classified as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes so that the income we derive from the vessels will remain “qualifying income.” However, if we do not receive a

favorable ruling from the IRS discussed above, we may (1) restructure the project, which may provide us less benefit than we originally anticipated or (2) require certain tax elections to be made by unitholders to avoid adverse tax consequences of this subsidiary being treated as a passive foreign investment company (or PFIC). For a discussion of the consequences of possible PFIC classification on our unitholders, please read “Material Tax Considerations — Consequences of Possible PFIC Classification.”

 

Taxation of Operating Income

 

The operating income of our subsidiaries Arctic Spirit LLC and Polar Spirit LLC and any other subsidiary classified as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes and, in the event we were treated as a corporation, our operating income may be subject to U.S. federal income taxation under one of two alternative tax regimes (the 4% gross basis tax or the net basis tax, as described below).

 

The 4% Gross Basis Tax

 

Our subsidiaries Arctic Spirit LLC and Polar Spirit LLC (and any other subsidiary classified as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) may be subject to a 4% U.S. federal income tax on the U.S. source portion of their gross income (without benefit of deductions) attributable to transportation that begins or ends (but not both) in the U.S., unless the Section 883 Exemption applies (as more fully described below under “— The Section 883 Exemption”) and we file a U.S. federal income tax return to claim that exemption or they are eligible for an exemption under an applicable tax treaty. For this purpose, gross income attributable to transportation (or transportation income) includes income from the use, hiring or leasing of a vessel to transport cargo, or the performance of services directly related to the use of any vessel to transport cargo, and thus includes time charter or bareboat charter income. The U.S. source portion of our subsidiaries’ transportation income is deemed to be 50% of the income attributable to voyages that begin or end (but not both) in the U.S. Generally, no amount of the income from voyages that begin and end outside the U.S. is treated as U.S. source, and consequently none of the transportation income attributable to such voyages is subject to U.S. federal income tax. Although the entire amount of transportation income from voyages that begin and end in the U.S. would be fully taxable in the U.S., we currently do not expect our subsidiaries to have any transportation income from voyages that begin and end in the U.S., however, there is no assurance that such voyages will not occur. In the event we are classified as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we may be subject to the 4% gross basis tax on all of our transportation income that begins or ends in the U.S. unless the Section 883 Exemption applies or we are eligible for an exemption under an applicable tax treaty.

 

Net Basis Tax and Branch Tax Regime

 

Neither we, nor any of our subsidiaries, currently expect to have a fixed place of business in the U.S. Nonetheless, if this were to change or we or any of our subsidiaries were otherwise treated as having such a fixed place of business involved in earning U.S. source transportation income, to the extent we or any of our subsidiaries were classified as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, such transportation income may be treated as effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the U.S. if substantially all of our U.S. source transportation income were attributable to regularly scheduled transportation. We do not believe that we earn U.S. source transportation income that is attributable to regularly scheduled transportation. Any income that we or our subsidiaries earn that is treated as U.S. effectively connected income would be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax (the highest statutory rate is currently 35%), unless the Section 883 Exemption (as discussed below) applied. The 4% U.S. federal income tax described above is inapplicable to U.S. effectively connected income.

 

Unless the Section 883 Exemption applied, a 30% branch profits tax imposed under Section 884 of the IRC also would apply to the earnings that result from U.S. effectively connected income, and a branch interest tax could be imposed on certain interest paid or deemed paid. In addition, on the sale of a vessel that has produced U.S. effectively connected income, the net basis corporate income tax and the 30% branch profits tax could apply with respect to gain not in excess of certain prior deductions for depreciation that reduced U.S. effectively connected income. Otherwise, we do not expect U.S. federal income tax to

apply with respect to gain realized on the sale of a vessel because we expect that any sale of a vessel will be structured so that it is considered to occur outside of the U.S. and so that it is not attributable to an office or other fixed place of business in the U.S.

 

The Section 883 Exemption

 

In general, if a non-U.S. corporation satisfies the requirements of Section 883 of the IRC and the regulations thereunder (or the Final Section 883 Regulations), it will not be subject to the 4% gross basis tax or the net basis tax described above on its U.S. source transportation income attributable to voyages that begin or end (but not both) in the U.S. (or U.S. Source International Shipping Income). As discussed below, we believe that under our current ownership structure, the Section 883 Exemption will apply to our subsidiaries Arctic Spirit LLC and Polar Spirit LLC and would apply to us if we were classified as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

 

A non-U.S. corporation will qualify for the Section 883 Exemption if it is organized in a jurisdiction outside the U.S. that grants an equivalent exemption from tax to corporations organized in the U.S. (or an Equivalent Exemption), it meets one of three ownership tests (or the Ownership Test) described in the Final Section 883 Regulations, and it meets certain substantiation, reporting and other requirements.

 

We and our subsidiaries, Arctic Spirit LLC and Polar Spirit LLC, are organized under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands. We anticipate that any other subsidiaries we form in the future that would be classified as corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes would also be organized under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands. The U.S. Treasury Department has recognized the Republic of the Marshall Islands as a jurisdiction that grants an Equivalent Exemption. Consequently, the U.S. Source International Shipping Income of Arctic Spirit LLC and Polar Spirit LLC and, in the event we were treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, our U.S. Source International Shipping Income (including for this purpose, any such income earned by our subsidiaries that have properly elected to be treated as partnerships or disregarded as entities separate from us for U.S. federal income tax purposes), would be exempt from U.S. federal income taxation provided the Ownership Test is met. We believe that Arctic Spirit LLC and Polar Spirit LLC would satisfy the Ownership Test. We also believe that we would satisfy the Ownership Test. However, the determination of whether we or our subsidiaries will satisfy the Ownership Test at any given time depends upon a multitude of factors, including the relative value of our common units, subordinated units, general partner interest and incentive distribution rights, Teekay Corporation’s ownership of us and rights to allocations and distributions from us, whether Teekay Corporation’s stock is publicly traded, the concentration of ownership of Teekay Corporation’s own stock and the satisfaction of various substantiation and documentation requirements. There can be no assurance that we would satisfy these requirements at any given time and, thus, that the U.S. Source International Shipping Income of us or of Arctic Spirit LLC or Polar Spirit LLC would be exempt from U.S. federal income taxation by reason of Section 883 in any of our taxable years.

 

Ratio of Taxable Income to Distributions

 

We estimate that a purchaser of common units in this offering who owns those common units from the date of closing of this offering through December 31, 2011, will be allocated an amount of U.S. federal taxable income for that period that will be 30% or less of the cash distributed with respect to that period. We anticipate that after the taxable year ending December 31, 2011, the ratio of allocable taxable income to cash distributions to the unitholders will increase. These estimates are based upon (1) assumptions as to the amount of our gross income from operations and distributions on all units, (2) the assumption that subsequent issuances of units, if any, during the period ending December 31, 2011 will not be made under circumstances that would increase the ratio of taxable income allocated to units issued in this offering to distributions during the period ending December 31, 2011 above 30%, (3) assumptions as to the amount of income we will earn from deposits with shipbuilders and from our subsidiaries classified as corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes, which under the passive loss rules, generally cannot be offset by our losses (please read “Material Federal Income Tax Considerations — Limitations on Deductibility of Losses”), and (4) other assumptions with respect to capital expenditures, foreign currency translation

income, gains on foreign currency transactions, cash flow and anticipated cash distributions. These estimates and assumptions are subject to, among other things, numerous business, economic, regulatory, competitive and political uncertainties beyond our control. Further, the estimates are based on current U.S. federal income tax law and tax reporting positions that we will adopt and with which the IRS could disagree. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that the actual ratio of taxable income allocated to units in this offering to cash distributions on the common units during the period ending December 31, 2011 will not be materially greater than our estimate of 30% or less. For example, the ratio of allocable taxable income to cash distributions could be greater, and perhaps substantially greater, than 30% with respect to the period described above if:

 

 

If the ratio of allocable taxable income to cash distributions were materially greater than our estimate, the value of the common units could be materially adversely affected.

 

Allocation of Income, Gain, Loss, Deduction and Credit

 

A unitholder’s taxable income or loss with respect to a common unit each year will depend upon a number of factors, including (1) the nature and fair market value of our assets at the time the holder acquired the common unit, (2) whether we issue additional units or we engage in certain other transactions, and (3) the manner in which our items of income, gain, loss and deduction are allocated among our partners. For this purpose, we determine the value of our assets and the relative amounts of our items of income, gain, loss and deduction allocable to our unitholders and our general partner as holder of the incentive distribution rights by reference to the value of our interests, including the incentive distribution rights. The IRS may challenge any valuation determinations that we make, particularly as to the incentive distribution rights, for which there is no public market. In addition, the IRS could challenge certain other aspects of the manner in which we determine the relative allocations made to our unitholders and to the general partner as holder of our incentive distribution rights. A successful IRS challenge to our valuation or allocation methods could increase the amount of net taxable income and gain realized by a unitholder with respect to a common unit.

 

Perkins Coie LLP is of the opinion that, with the exception of the issues described in the preceding paragraph, “— Asset Tax Basis, Depreciation and Amortization” below, and in the accompanying base prospectus under “— Consequences of Unit Ownership — Section 754 Election,” and “— Disposition of Common Units — Allocations Between Transferors and Transferees,” allocations under our partnership agreement will be given effect for U.S. federal income tax purposes in determining a partner’s share of an item of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit.

 

Asset Tax Basis, Depreciation and Amortization

 

The U.S. federal income tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of units will depend in part on our estimates of the relative fair market values, and the tax bases, of our assets at the time the holder acquired the common unit, we issue additional units or we engage in certain other transactions. Although we may from time to time consult with professional appraisers regarding valuation matters, we will make many of the relative fair market value estimates ourselves. These estimates and determinations of basis are subject to challenge and will not be binding on the IRS or the courts. If the estimates of fair market value or basis are later found to be incorrect, the character and amount of items of income, gain, loss, deductions

or credits previously reported by unitholders might change, and unitholders might be required to adjust their tax liability for prior years and incur interest and penalties with respect to those adjustments.

 

May 2007 Constructive Termination if IRS Does Not Grant the Requested Ruling

 

We will be considered to have been terminated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, then to have been reconstituted as a new partnership, each time there is a sale or exchange of more than 50% of the total interests in our capital and profits within a twelve-month period. See “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences — Disposition of Common Units — Constructive Termination.”

 

On May 11, 2007, Teekay Corporation transferred its greater than 50% interest in our capital and profits to its wholly-owned subsidiary, Teekay Holdings Limited. As a result of this transfer and because Teekay Holdings Limited did not timely elect to be classified as a disregarded subsidiary of Teekay Corporation for U.S. tax purposes, we will be considered to have terminated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes on May 11, 2007, then to have been reconstituted as a new partnership, unless the IRS grants Teekay Holdings Limited’s request for an extension of time to make the classification election.

 

If we were considered terminated as a partnership on May 11, 2007, our depreciation and amortization deductions for 2007 and many subsequent years would be lower than if the termination did not occur. However, for purchasers of units in this offering, we expect the cumulative ratio of our taxable income to distributions for the period from the issuance of the units through 2011 to be no less than 30% even in the event we terminated on May 11, 2007. See “— Ratio of Taxable Income to Distributions.”

 

If we were considered terminated as a partnership on May 11, 2007, we would incur administrative expenses in connection with the filing of amended tax returns for 2007 and 2008 and amended unitholder information reports for 2007 and 2008, and the IRS might assert penalties and interest against us for failure to take the termination into account in our original tax returns and information reports, though Teekay Corporation has agreed to indemnify us for these and any other costs or losses to us arising from a May 11, 2007 termination.

 

Consequences of Possible PFIC Classification

 

A non-U.S. entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes will be a PFIC in any taxable year in which, after taking into account the income and assets of the corporation and certain subsidiaries pursuant to a “look through” rule, either (1) at least 75% of its gross income is “passive” income (or the income test) or (2) at least 50% of the average value of its assets is attributable to assets that produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income (or the assets test).

 

We do not believe that we would be considered to be a PFIC even if we were treated as a corporation based principally on the position that at least a majority, if not all, of the gross income we derive from our time charters should constitute service income (which generally is not passive income), rather than rental income (which generally is passive income). Correspondingly, the assets that we own and operate in connection with the production of such income, in particular the vessels operating under time charters, should not constitute passive assets for purposes of determining whether we would be a PFIC. However, legal uncertainties are involved in this determination and there is no assurance that the nature of our assets, income and operations will remain the same in the future.

 

Our subsidiaries Arctic Spirit LLC and Polar Spirit LLC will be classified as corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Our counsel, Perkins Coie LLP, is of the opinion that neither Arctic Spirit LLC nor Polar Spirit LLC should be a PFIC based on certain representations that we have made to them regarding our relationship to Teekay Corporation, and the composition of the assets and the nature of the activities and other operations of those subsidiaries, and Teekay Corporation with respect to the vessels under time charters with those subsidiaries, including the joint development and option agreement entered into by Teekay Corporation and Arctic Spirit LLC. However, legal uncertainties are involved in this determination, and there is no assurance that the IRS or a court would agree with the opinion we have received from Perkins Coie LLP. In addition, there is no assurance that our relationship to Teekay

Corporation, the composition of the assets and the nature of the activities and other operations of Arctic Spirit LLC or Polar Spirit LLC, or Teekay Corporation with respect to the vessels under time charters with those subsidiaries, will remain the same in the future.

 

As indicated above, we anticipate that the LPG carriers acquired from I.M. Skaugen ASA will be held by a foreign subsidiary classified as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes that is wholly owned by a U.S. partnership. We have requested a ruling from the IRS that would cause this foreign subsidiary not to be classified as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If we do not receive a favorable ruling from the IRS, we anticipate that we would operate the LPG carriers in a pass-through structure rather than a corporation, and thereby avoid PFIC status for those vessels.

 

If we receive a favorable ruling with respect to the LPG carrier structure, we anticipate that we will use the same structure to acquire and hold the carriers servicing the Tangguh LNG project. If we do not receive a favorable ruling, we believe placing Tangguh LNG carriers in a pass-through structure could jeopardize our status as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes due to the nature of their charter agreements and the amount of income they generate. In order to preserve this status, we are exploring potential alternatives, which could include restructuring the Tangguh LNG project to allow us to realize at least a portion of the income derived from these vessels. In the alternative, unitholders may have to make a qualified electing fund election, as discussed below, in order to avoid a potential adverse tax result.

 

If we were classified as a PFIC, for any year during which a unitholder owns units, we generally will be subject to special rules (regardless of whether we continue thereafter to be a PFIC) with respect to (1) any “excess distribution” (generally, any distribution received by a unitholder in a taxable year that is greater than 125% of the average annual distributions received by the unitholder in the three preceding taxable years or, if shorter, the unitholder’s holding period for the units) and (2) any gain realized upon the sale or other disposition of units. Under these rules:

 

 

If any of our subsidiaries were to be classified as a PFIC, similar rules would apply to the extent of distributions received by us from these entities or to the extent gain realized by unitholder is attributable to these entities.

 

Certain elections, such as a qualified electing fund (or QEF) election or mark-to-market election, may be available to a unitholder if we or any of our subsidiaries were classified as a PFIC. If we determine that we or any of such subsidiaries is or will be a PFIC, we will provide unitholders with information concerning the potential availability of such elections.

 

A unitholder making a timely qualified electing fund election (or an Electing Holder) with respect to us (or any of our subsidiaries), must report for U.S. federal income tax purposes the pro rata share of our (or such subsidiary’s) ordinary earnings and net capital gain, if any, for our (or such subsidiary’s) taxable years that end with or within the taxable year, regardless of whether or not the Electing Holder received distributions from us (or whether we received distributions from such subsidiary) in that year. The Electing Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the common units (or our basis in such subsidiary) will be increased to reflect taxed but undistributed earnings and profits. Distributions of earnings and profits that were previously taxed will result in a corresponding reduction in the Electing Holder’s adjusted tax basis in common units (or our basis in such subsidiary) and will not be taxed again once distributed. An Electing Holder generally will recognize capital gain or loss on the sale, exchange or other disposition of our common units. A

unitholder makes a qualified electing fund election with respect to any year that we are (or such subsidiary is) a PFIC by filing IRS Form 8621 with the unitholder’s U.S. federal income tax return. If contrary to our expectations, we determine that we are (or any such subsidiary is) treated as a PFIC for any taxable year, we will provide each unitholder with the information necessary to make the qualified electing fund election described above.

 

Under current law, dividends received by individual citizens or residents of the U.S. from domestic corporations and qualified foreign corporations generally are treated as net capital gains and subject to U.S. federal income tax at reduced rates (generally 15%). However, if we are classified as a PFIC for the taxable year in which a dividend is paid, we would not be considered a qualified foreign corporation and the dividends received from us would not be eligible for the reduced rate of U.S. federal income tax.

 

Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and UBS Securities LLC are acting as joint book-running managers of this offering and as representatives for the other underwriters named below. Subject to the terms and conditions stated in the underwriting agreement, dated the date of this prospectus supplement, each underwriter named below has severally agreed to purchase, and we have agreed to sell to that underwriter, the number of common units set forth opposite the underwriter’s name.

 

 

The business address of Citigroup Global Markets Inc. is 388 Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10013. The business address of Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated is 1585 Broadway, New York, New York 10036. The business address of UBS Securities LLC is 299 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10171.

 

The underwriting agreement provides that the obligations of the underwriters to purchase the units included in this offering are subject to approval of legal matters by counsel and to other conditions. The underwriters are obligated to purchase all the units (other than those covered by their option to purchase additional units described below) if they purchase any of the units.

 

The underwriters propose to offer some of the common units directly to the public at the public offering price set forth on the cover page of this prospectus supplement and some of the common units to dealers at the public offering price less a concession not to exceed $0.438 per common unit. If all of the common units are not sold at the initial offering price, the representatives may change the public offering price and the other selling terms.

 

We have granted to the underwriters an option, exercisable for 30 days from the date of this prospectus supplement, to purchase up to 600,000 additional common units at the public offering price less the underwriting discount. The underwriters may exercise the option solely for the purpose of covering over-allotments, if any, in connection with this offering. To the extent the option is exercised, each underwriter must purchase a number of additional units approximately proportionate to that underwriter’s initial purchase commitment.

 

We, together with our general partner, Teekay Corporation, Teekay Holdings Limited, and the executive officers and directors of our general partner have agreed that, for a period of 60 days from the date of this prospectus supplement, we and they will not, without the prior written consent of the representatives, dispose of or hedge any of our common units or any securities convertible into or exchangeable for our common units. The representatives in their sole discretion may release any of the securities subject to these lock-up agreements at any time without notice.

 

Our common units are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “TGP.”

 

The following table summarizes the underwriting discounts and commissions we will pay to the underwriters in connection with this offering. These amounts are shown assuming both no exercise and full exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional common units.

 

 

In connection with the offering, the representatives, on behalf of the underwriters, may purchase and sell common units in the open market. These transactions may include short sales, syndicate covering transactions

and stabilizing transactions. Short sales involve syndicate sales of common units in excess of the number of units to be purchased by the underwriters in the offering, which creates a syndicate short position. “Covered” short sales are sales of units made in an amount up to the number of units represented by the underwriters’ over-allotment option. In determining the source of units to close out the covered syndicate short position, the underwriters will consider, among other things, the price of units available for purchase in the open market as compared to the price at which they may purchase units through their option to purchase common units through the over-allotment option. Transactions to close out the covered syndicate short position involve either purchases of the common units in the open market after the distribution has been completed or the exercise of the over-allotment option. The underwriters may also make “naked” short sales of units in excess of the over-allotment option. The underwriters must close out any naked short position by purchasing common units in the open market. A naked short position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are concerned that there may be downward pressure on the price of the units in the open market after pricing that could adversely affect investors who purchase in the offering. Stabilizing transactions consist of bids for or purchases of units in the open market while the offering is in progress.

 

The underwriters also may impose a penalty bid. Penalty bids permit the underwriters to reclaim a selling concession from a syndicate member when an underwriter repurchases units originally sold by that syndicate member in order to cover syndicate short positions or make stabilizing purchases.

 

Any of these activities may have the effect of preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of the common units. They may also cause the price of the common units to be higher than the price that would otherwise exist in the open market in the absence of these transactions. The underwriters may conduct these transactions on the New York Stock Exchange or in the over-the-counter market, or otherwise. If the underwriters commence any of these transactions, they may discontinue them at any time.

 

The compensation received by the underwriters in connection with this common unit offering will not exceed 10% of the gross proceeds from this common unit offering for commissions and 0.5% for due diligence.

 

We estimate that our portion of the total expenses of this offering will be approximately $385,000 (exclusive of underwriting discounts and commissions).

 

Because the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority views the common units offered hereby as interests in a direct participation program, the offering is being made in compliance with Rule 2810 of the NASD Conduct Rules. Investor suitability with respect to the common units should be judged similarly to the suitability with respect to other securities that are listed for trading on a national securities exchange.

 

The underwriters and their related entities have engaged and may engage in commercial and investment banking transactions with Teekay Corporation and its affiliates, our general partner and us in the ordinary course of its business. They have received and may receive customary compensation and expenses for these commercial and investment banking transactions.

 

A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on the websites maintained by one or more of the underwriters. The representatives may agree to allocate a number of common units to underwriters for sale to their online brokerage account holders. The representatives will allocate units to underwriters that may make Internet distributions on the same basis as other allocations. In addition, common units may be sold by the underwriters to securities dealers who resell units to online brokerage account holders.

 

Other than the prospectus in electronic format, the information on any underwriter’s or selling group member’s website and any information contained in any other website maintained by any underwriter or selling group member is not part of the prospectus or the registration statement of which this prospectus supplement forms a part, has not been approved and/or endorsed by us or any underwriter or selling group member in its capacity as underwriter or selling group member and should not be relied upon by investors.

 

We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, or to contribute to payments that may be required to be made in respect of these liabilities.

 

Teekay LNG Partners L.P. is organized under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands as a limited partnership. Our general partner is organized under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands as a limited liability company. The Republic of the Marshall Islands has a less developed body of securities laws as compared to the United States and provides protections for investors to a significantly lesser extent.

 

Most of the directors and officers of our general partner and those of our subsidiaries are residents of countries other than the United States. Substantially all of our and our subsidiaries’ assets and a substantial portion of the assets of the directors and officers of our general partner are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for United States investors to effect service of process within the United States upon us, our general partner, our subsidiaries or the directors and officers of our general partner or to realize against us or them judgments obtained in United States courts, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States. However, we have expressly submitted to the jurisdiction of the U.S. federal and New York state courts sitting in the City of New York for the purpose of any suit, action or proceeding arising under the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States, and we have appointed Watson, Farley & Williams (New York) LLP to accept service of process on our behalf in any such action.

 

Watson, Farley & Williams (New York) LLP, our counsel as to Marshall Islands law, has advised us that there is uncertainty as to whether the courts of the Republic of the Marshall Islands would (1) recognize or enforce against us, our general partner or our general partner’s directors or officers judgments of courts of the United States based on civil liability provisions of applicable U.S. federal and state securities laws or (2) impose liabilities against us, our general partner or our general partner’s directors and officers in original actions brought in the Marshall Islands, based on these laws.

 

The validity of the common units offered hereby and certain other legal matters with respect to the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands will be passed upon for us by our counsel as to Marshall Islands law, Watson, Farley & Williams (New York) LLP. Certain other legal matters will be passed upon for us by Perkins Coie LLP, Portland, Oregon, which may rely on the opinions of Watson, Farley & Williams (New York) LLP for all matters of Marshall Islands Law. Baker Botts, L.L.P., Houston, Texas, will pass upon certain legal matters in connection with the offering on behalf of the underwriters.

 

The consolidated financial statements of Teekay LNG Partners appearing in its Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, and the effectiveness of Teekay LNG Partners’ internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in their reports thereon included therein, and incorporated herein by reference. Such financial statements are incorporated herein in reliance upon the reports of Ernst & Young LLP pertaining to such financial statements and the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing. You may contact Ernst & Young LLP at address 700 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V7Y 1C7, Canada.

 

The following table sets forth costs and expenses, other than any underwriting discounts and commissions, we expect to incur in connection with the issuance and distribution of the common units covered by this prospectus. Other than the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee which is set forth in the base prospectus, all amounts are estimated.

 

PROSPECTUS

$400,000,000

 

Teekay LNG Partners L.P.

Teekay LNG Finance Corp.

 

 

 

Common Units

Debt Securities

 

 

 

 

We may offer, from time to time:

 

 

Teekay LNG Finance Corp. may act as co-issuer of the debt securities, and other direct or indirect subsidiaries of Teekay LNG Partners L.P. may guarantee the debt securities.

 

The securities we may offer:

 

 

We may offer these securities directly or to or through underwriters, dealers or other agents. The names of any underwriters or dealers will be set forth in the applicable prospectus supplement.

 

Our common units trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “TGP.” We will provide information in the prospectus supplement for the trading market, if any, for any debt securities we may offer.

 

This prospectus provides you with a general description of the securities we may offer. Each time we offer to sell securities we will provide a prospectus supplement that will contain specific information about those securities and the terms of that offering. The prospectus supplement may also add, update or change information contained in this prospectus. This prospectus may be used to offer and sell securities only if accompanied by a prospectus supplement. You should read this prospectus and any prospectus supplement carefully before you invest. You should also read the documents we refer to in the “Where You Can Find More Information” section of this prospectus for information about us and our financial statements.

 

Limited partnerships are inherently different than corporations. You should carefully consider each of the factors described under “Risk Factors” beginning on page 7 of this prospectus before you make an investment in our securities.

 

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 

 

September 29, 2006

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus, any prospectus supplement and the documents incorporated by reference in this prospectus. We have not authorized anyone else to give you different information. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. We are not offering these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted. You should not assume that the information in this prospectus or any prospectus supplement is accurate as of any date other than the date on the front of those documents. We will disclose material changes in our affairs in an amendment to this prospectus, a prospectus supplement or a future filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission incorporated by reference in this prospectus.

 

This prospectus is part of a registration statement on Form F-3 that we have filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (or SEC) using a “shelf” registration process. Under this shelf registration process, we may sell, in one or more offerings, up to $400,000,000 in total aggregate offering price of the securities described in this prospectus. This prospectus generally describes us and the securities we may offer. Each time we offer securities with this prospectus, we will provide this prospectus and a prospectus supplement that will describe, among other things, the specific amounts and prices of the securities being offered and the terms of the offering, including, in the case of debt securities, the specific terms of the securities. The prospectus supplement may also add to, update or change information in this prospectus. If there is any inconsistency between the information in this prospectus and any prospectus supplement, you should rely on the information in the prospectus supplement.

 

Unless otherwise indicated, references in this prospectus to “Teekay LNG Partners,” “we,” “us” and “our” and similar terms refer to Teekay LNG Partners L.P. and/or one or more of its subsidiaries, except that those terms, when used in this prospectus in connection with the common units described herein, shall mean Teekay LNG Partners L.P. References in this prospectus to “Teekay Shipping Corporation” refer to Teekay Shipping Corporation and/or any one or more of its subsidiaries.

 

Unless otherwise indicated, all references in this prospectus to “dollars” and “$” are to, and amounts are presented in, U.S. Dollars, and financial information presented in this prospectus is prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (or GAAP).

 

The information in this prospectus is accurate as of its date. You should read carefully this prospectus, any prospectus supplement, and the additional information described below under the heading “Where You Can Find More Information.”

 

Teekay LNG Partners L.P. is an international provider of liquefied natural gas (or LNG) and crude oil marine transportation services. In November 2004, we were formed as a Marshall Islands limited partnership by Teekay Shipping Corporation, the world’s largest owner and operator of medium-sized crude oil tankers, to expand its operations in the LNG shipping sector. Our growth strategy focuses on expanding our fleet of LNG carriers under long-term, fixed-rate charters. We view our Suezmax tanker fleet primarily as a source of stable cash flow as we expand our LNG operations. We seek to leverage the expertise, relationships and reputation of Teekay Shipping Corporation and its affiliates to pursue growth opportunities in the LNG shipping sector. Teekay Shipping Corporation currently owns our general partner and a 67.8% limited partner interest in us.

 

Our fleet, excluding newbuilding vessels, currently consists of four LNG carriers and eight Suezmax class crude oil tankers, all of which are double-hulled. These vessels operate under long-term, fixed-rate time charter contracts with major energy and utility companies. As of September 1, 2006, the average remaining term for these charters was approximately 19 years for our LNG carriers and approximately 13 years for our Suezmax tankers, subject, in certain circumstances, to termination or vessel purchase rights. We have agreed to purchase from Teekay Shipping Corporation its rights to three newbuilding LNG carriers under capital leases upon the delivery of the first vessel, which is scheduled during the fourth quarter of 2006.

 

 

Our operations are conducted through, and our operating assets are owned by, our subsidiaries. We own our interests in our subsidiaries through our 100% ownership interest in our operating company, Teekay LNG Operating L.L.C., a Marshall Islands limited liability company. Our general partner, Teekay GP L.L.C., a Marshall Islands limited liability company, has an economic interest in us and manages our operations and activities. Our general partner does not receive any management fee or other compensation in connection with its management of our business, but it is entitled to be reimbursed for all direct and indirect expenses incurred on our behalf.

 

Our principal executive offices are located at Bayside House, Bayside Executive Park, West Bay Street and Blake Road, P.O. Box AP-59212, Nassau, Commonwealth of the Bahamas, and our phone number is (242) 502-8820.

 

 

Teekay LNG Finance Corp. is a Marshall Islands corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Teekay LNG Partners. It has nominal assets and its activities will be limited to co-issuing debt securities that Teekay LNG Partners may offer and engaging in other activities incidental thereto. Teekay LNG Finance Corp. may act as co-issuer of debt securities to allow investment in those securities by institutional investors that may not otherwise be able to invest due to our structure and investment restrictions under their respective states of organization or charters. You should not expect Teekay LNG Finance Corp. to be able to service obligations on any debt securities for which it may act as co-issuer.

 

 

As of the date of this prospectus, Teekay LNG Partners owns, directly or indirectly, 100% of the outstanding ownership interests of the following subsidiaries, among others: Teekay LNG Operating L.L.C., African Spirit L.L.C., Asian Spirit L.L.C., European Spirit L.L.C., Teekay Luxembourg S.a.r.l., Teekay Spain, S.L., Teekay II Iberia S.L., Teekay Shipping Spain, S.L., Naviera Teekay Gas, S.L., Naviera Teekay Gas II, S.L., Naviera Teekay Gas III, S.L. and Naviera Teekay Gas IV, S.L. If specified in the prospectus supplement for a series of debt securities offered by this prospectus, the subsidiaries of Teekay LNG Partners L.P. specified in the prospectus supplement will unconditionally guarantee, on a joint and several basis, the full and prompt payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the debt securities of that series. Occasionally in this prospectus we refer to Teekay LNG Partner’s subsidiaries that may provide these guarantees as the “Subsidiary Guarantors,” which term will also include any other subsidiaries of Teekay LNG Partners that may hereafter be added to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part and may provide such guarantees.

 

We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form F-3 regarding the securities covered by this prospectus. This prospectus does not contain all of the information found in the registration statement. For further information regarding us and the securities offered in this prospectus, you may wish to review the full registration statement, including its exhibits. The registration statement, including the exhibits, may be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of this material can also be obtained upon written request from the Public Reference Section of the SEC at that address, at prescribed rates, or from the SEC’s web site on the Internet at www.sec.gov free of charge. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on public reference rooms. Our registration statement can also be inspected and copied at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange, Inc., 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005.

 

We are subject to the information requirements of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (or the Exchange Act), and, in accordance therewith, we are required to file with the SEC annual reports on Form 20-F within six months of our fiscal year-end, and provide to the SEC other material information on Form 6-K. We intend to file our annual report on Form 20-F earlier than the SEC currently requires. These reports and other information may be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC or obtained from the SEC’s website as provided above. Our website on the Internet is located at www.teekaylng.com, and we expect to make our periodic reports and other information filed with or furnished to the SEC available, free of charge, through our website, as soon as reasonably practicable after those reports and other information are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. Information on our website or any other website is not incorporated by reference into this prospectus and does not constitute a part of this prospectus.

 

As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt under the Exchange Act from, among other things, certain rules prescribing the furnishing and content of proxy statements, and our executive officers, directors and principal unitholders are exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions contained in Section 16 of the Exchange Act. In addition, we are not required under the Exchange Act to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as U.S. companies whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act, including the filing of quarterly reports or current reports on Form 8-K. However, we intend to make available quarterly reports containing our unaudited interim financial information for the first three fiscal quarters of each fiscal year.

 

The SEC allows us to “incorporate by reference” into this prospectus information that we file with the SEC. This means that we can disclose important information to you without actually including the specific information in this prospectus by referring you to other documents filed separately with the SEC. The information incorporated by reference is an important part of this prospectus. Information that we later provide to the SEC, and which is deemed to be “filed” with the SEC, automatically will update information previously filed with the SEC, and may replace information in this prospectus.

 

We incorporate by reference into this prospectus the documents listed below:

 

 

These reports contain important information about us, our financial condition and our results of operations.

 

You may obtain any of the documents incorporated by reference in this prospectus from the SEC through its public reference facilities or its website at the addresses provided above. You also may request a copy of any document incorporated by reference in this prospectus (excluding any exhibits to those documents, unless the exhibit is specifically incorporated by reference in this document), at no cost, by visiting our Internet website at www.teekaylng.com, or by writing or calling us at the following address:

 

Teekay LNG Partners L.P.

Bayside House, Bayside Executive Park

West Bay Street and Blake Road

P.O. Box AP-59212

Nassau, Commonwealth of the Bahamas

Attn: Corporate Secretary

(242) 502-8820

 

You should rely only on the information incorporated by reference or provided in this prospectus or any prospectus supplement. We have not authorized anyone else to provide you with any information. You should not assume that the information incorporated by reference or provided in this prospectus or any prospectus supplement is accurate as of any date other than the date on the front of each document.

 

All statements, other than statements of historical fact, included in or incorporated by reference into this prospectus and any prospectus supplements are forward-looking statements. In addition, we and our representatives may from time to time make other oral or written statements that also forward-looking statements. Such statements include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies, business prospects, changes and trends in our business, and the markets in which we operate. In some cases, you can identify the forward-looking statements by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “forecast,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “propose,” “potential,” “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology.

 

Forward-looking statements include statements with respect to, among other things:

 

 

These and other forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those risks discussed in “Risk Factors” below and those risks discussed in other reports we file with the SEC and that are incorporated in this prospectus by reference. The risks, uncertainties and assumptions involve known and unknown risks and are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control.

 

Forward-looking statements are made based upon management’s current plans, expectations, estimates, assumptions and beliefs concerning future events affecting us and, therefore, involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including those risks discussed in “Risk Factors.” We caution that forward-looking statements are not guarantees and that actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements.

 

We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of these factors. Further, we cannot assess the effect of each such factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to be materially different from those contained in any forward-looking statement.

 

Although many of our business risks are comparable to those a corporation engaged in a similar business would face, limited partner interests are inherently different from the capital stock of a corporation. You should carefully consider the following risk factors together with all of the other information included or incorporated in this prospectus when evaluating an investment in our common units or debt securities.

 

If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or operating results could be materially harmed. In that case, our ability to pay distributions on our common units or pay interest on, or principal of, any debt securities, may be reduced, the trading price of our securities could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

 

 

We may not have sufficient cash available to make required payments on our debt securities or to pay the minimum quarterly distribution on our common units. The amount of cash we have available to make required payments on our debt securities or to distribute on our common units principally depends upon the amount of cash we generate from our operations, which may fluctuate based on, among other things:

 

 

The actual amount of cash we will have available for required payments on our debt securities and distributions on our common units also will depend on factors such as:

 

 

The amount of cash we generate from our operations may differ materially from our profit or loss for the period, which will be affected by non-cash items. As a result of this and the other factors mentioned above, we may make cash distributions during periods when we record losses and may not make cash distributions during periods when we record net income.

 

We must make substantial capital expenditures to maintain, over the long term, the operating capacity of our fleet. These maintenance capital expenditures include capital expenditures associated with drydocking a vessel, modifying an existing vessel or acquiring a new vessel to the extent these expenditures are incurred to maintain the operating capacity of our fleet. These expenditures could increase as a result of changes in:

 

 

Our significant maintenance capital expenditures will reduce the amount of cash we have available to make required payments on our debt securities and for distribution to our unitholders.

 

In addition, our actual maintenance capital expenditures vary significantly from quarter to quarter based on, among other things, the number of vessels drydocked during that quarter. Our partnership agreement requires our general partner to deduct estimated, rather than actual, maintenance capital expenditures from operating surplus each quarter in an effort to reduce fluctuations in operating surplus. The amount of estimated maintenance capital expenditures deducted from operating surplus is subject to review and change by the conflicts committee of our general partner at least once a year. In years when estimated maintenance capital expenditures are higher than actual maintenance capital expenditures — as we expect will be the case in the years we are not required to make expenditures for mandatory drydockings — the amount of cash available for distribution to unitholders will be lower than if actual maintenance capital expenditures were deducted from operating surplus. If our general partner underestimates the appropriate level of estimated maintenance capital expenditures, we may have less cash available for distribution in future periods when actual capital expenditures begin to exceed our previous estimates.

 

 

We intend to make substantial capital expenditures to increase the size of our fleet, particularly the number of LNG carriers we own.

 

During May 2005, we entered into an agreement with Teekay Shipping Corporation to purchase its 70% interest in Teekay Nakilat Corporation. Our estimated purchase commitment is $92.8 million. Teekay Nakilat Corporation has a 30-year capital lease arrangement on three LNG carriers currently under construction. The purchase will occur upon the delivery of the first LNG newbuilding carrier under lease, which is scheduled during the fourth quarter of 2006.

 

In addition, we are obligated to purchase five of our existing Suezmax tankers upon the termination of the related capital leases, which will occur at various times from 2007 to 2010. The purchase price will be based on the unamortized portion of the vessel construction financing costs for the vessels, which we expect

to range from $39.4 million to $41.9 million per vessel. We expect to finance these purchases by assuming the existing vessel financing.

 

We and Teekay Shipping Corporation regularly evaluate and pursue opportunities to provide the marine transportation requirements for new or expanding LNG projects. The award process relating to LNG transportation opportunities typically involves various stages and takes several months to complete. Neither we nor Teekay Shipping Corporation may be awarded charters relating to any of the projects we or it pursues. If any LNG project charters are awarded to Teekay Shipping Corporation, it must offer them to us pursuant to the terms of the omnibus agreement we entered into in May 2005 at the closing of our initial public offering of common units. In July and August 2005, Teekay Shipping Corporation announced the awards to it of a 70% interest in two LNG carriers and related long-term, fixed-rate time charters to service the Tangguh LNG project in Indonesia and a 40% interest in four LNG carriers and related long-term, fixed-rate time charters to service an LNG project in Qatar. In connection with these awards, Teekay Shipping Corporation has (a) exercised shipbuilding options to construct two 155,000 cubic meter LNG carriers at a total delivered cost of approximately $450 million, which vessels are scheduled to deliver in late 2008 and early 2009, respectively, and (b) entered into agreements to construct four 217,000 cubic meter LNG carriers at a total delivered cost of approximately $1.1 billion, which vessels are scheduled to deliver in the first half of 2008.

 

If we elect pursuant to the omnibus agreement to obtain Teekay Shipping Corporation’s interests in either or both of these LNG projects or any other projects Teekay Shipping Corporation may be awarded, or if we bid on and are awarded contracts relating to any LNG project, we will need to incur significant capital expenditures to buy Teekay Shipping Corporation’s interest in these LNG projects or to build the LNG carriers.

 

To fund the remaining portion of these and other capital expenditures, we will be required to use cash from operations or incur borrowings or raise capital through the sale of debt or additional equity securities. Use of cash from operations will reduce cash available to make required payments on our debt securities and for distributions to our unitholders. Our ability to obtain bank financing or to access the capital markets for future offerings may be limited by our financial condition at the time of any such financing or offerings as well as by adverse market conditions resulting from, among other things, general economic conditions and contingencies and uncertainties that are beyond our control. Our failure to obtain the funds for necessary future capital expenditures could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and on our ability to make required payments on our debt securities and cash distributions on our common units. Even if we are successful in obtaining necessary funds, the terms of such financings could limit our ability to make required payments on our debt securities or pay cash distributions to our unitholders. In addition, incurring additional debt may significantly increase our interest expense and financial leverage, and issuing additional equity securities may result in significant unitholder dilution and would increase the aggregate amount of cash required to meet our minimum quarterly distribution to unitholders, which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to make required payments on our debt securities and cash distributions on our common units.

 

If we were unable to obtain financing required to complete payments on any future newbuilding orders, we could effectively forfeit all or a portion of the progress payments previously made.

 

 

We have derived, and believe that we will continue to derive, a significant portion of our revenues and cash flow from a limited number of customers. Compania Espanola de Petroleos, S.A. (or CEPSA), an international oil company, accounted for approximately 47%, 36%, 30% and 30% of our revenues during 2003, 2004, 2005 and the first half of 2006, respectively. In addition, two other customers, Spanish energy companies Repsol YPF, S.A. and Gas Natural SDG, S.A., accounted for 26% and 11% of our revenues in 2003, 18% and 21% of our revenues in 2004, 33% and 18% of our revenues in 2005 and 28% and 12% of our revenues in the first half of 2006, respectively. In addition, Unión Fenosa Gas, S.A. accounted for 16% of

our revenues in 2005 and 13% of our revenues in the first half of 2006. As a result of our acquisition of the three Suezmax tankers (or the ConocoPhillips Tankers) from Teekay Shipping Corporation upon the closing of our follow-on public offering in November 2005, we derived 17% of our revenues in the first half of 2006 from a ConocoPhillips subsidiary, the customer under the related time charter contracts. No other customer accounted for 10% or more of our revenues during any of these periods. Ras Laffan Liquefied Natural Gas Co. Limited (II) (or RasGas II) will be a significant customer following the delivery in 2006 and 2007 of three LNG newbuildings that we will operate under 20-year time charters with RasGas II following our purchase of Teekay Shipping Corporation’s 70% interest in Teekay Nakilat, which owns the three subsidiaries that will lease the vessels under capital leases.

 

We could lose a customer or the benefits of a time charter if:

 

 

If we lose a key LNG time charter, we may be unable to re-deploy the related vessel on terms as favorable to us due to the long-term nature of most LNG time charters and the lack of an established LNG spot market. If we are unable to re-deploy an LNG carrier, we will not receive any revenues from that vessel, but we may be required to pay expenses necessary to maintain the vessel in proper operating condition. In addition, if a customer exercises its right to purchase a vessel, we would not receive any further revenue from the vessel and may be unable to obtain a substitute vessel and charter. This may cause us to receive decreased revenue and cash flows from having fewer vessels operating in our fleet. Any compensation under our charters for a purchase of the vessels may not adequately compensate us for the loss of the vessel and related time charter.

 

If we lose a key Suezmax tanker customer, we may be unable to obtain other long-term Suezmax charters and may become subject to the volatile spot market, which is highly competitive and subject to significant price fluctuations. If a customer exercises its right under some charters to purchase or force a sale of the vessel, we may be unable to acquire an adequate replacement vessel or may be forced to construct a new vessel. Any replacement newbuilding would not generate revenues during its construction and we may be unable to charter any replacement vessel on terms as favorable to us as those of the terminated charter.

 

The loss of any of our customers, time charters or vessels, or a decline in payments under our charters, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and our ability to make required payments on our debt securities and distributions on our common units.

 

 

Pursuant to certain services agreements between us and certain of our operating subsidiaries, on the one hand, and certain subsidiaries of Teekay Shipping Corporation, on the other hand, the Teekay Shipping Corporation subsidiaries provide to us administrative services and to our operating subsidiaries significant

operational services (including vessel maintenance, crewing for some of our vessels, purchasing, shipyard supervision, insurance and financial services) and other technical, advisory and administrative services. Our operational success and ability to execute our growth strategy depend significantly upon Teekay Shipping Corporation’s satisfactory performance of these services. Our business will be harmed if Teekay Shipping Corporation fails to perform these services satisfactorily or if Teekay Shipping Corporation stops providing these services to us.

 

Our ability to compete for the transportation requirements of LNG projects and to enter into new time charters and expand our customer relationships depends largely on our ability to leverage our relationship with Teekay Shipping Corporation and its reputation and relationships in the shipping industry. If Teekay Shipping Corporation suffers material damage to its reputation or relationships it may harm our ability to:

 

 

If our ability to do any of the things described above is impaired, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and our ability to make required payments on our debt securities and cash distributions on our common units.

 

Prior to entering into capital leases with respect to the three RasGas II LNG newbuildings, Teekay Shipping Corporation was incurring all costs for the construction and delivery of the vessels, which we refer to as “warehousing.” Upon their delivery, we would have purchased all of the interest of Teekay Shipping Corporation in the vessels at a price that would reimburse Teekay Shipping Corporation for these costs and compensate it for its average weighted cost of capital on the construction payments. We may enter into similar arrangements with Teekay Shipping Corporation or third parties in the future. If Teekay Shipping Corporation or another warehousing partner fails to make construction payments for any vessels that may be warehoused for us, we could lose access to the vessels as a result of the default or we may need to finance these vessels before they begin operating and generating voyage revenues, which could harm our business and reduce our ability to make required payments on our debt securities and cash distributions on our common units.

 

 

Our growth strategy focuses on continued expansion in the LNG shipping sector. Accordingly, our growth depends on continued growth in world and regional demand for LNG and LNG shipping, which could be negatively affected by a number of factors, such as:

 

 

Reduced demand for LNG and LNG shipping would have a material adverse effect on our future growth and could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

A complete LNG project includes production, liquefaction, regasification, storage and distribution facilities and LNG carriers. Existing LNG projects and infrastructure are limited, and new or expanded LNG projects are highly complex and capital-intensive, with new projects often costing several billion dollars. Many factors could negatively affect continued development of LNG infrastructure or disrupt the supply of LNG, including:

 

 

If the LNG supply chain is disrupted or does not continue to grow, or if a significant LNG explosion, spill or similar incident occurs, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and our ability to make required payments on our debt securities and cash distributions on our common units.

 

 

One of our principal objectives is to enter into additional long-term, fixed-rate LNG time charters. The process of obtaining new long-term LNG time charters is highly competitive and generally involves an intensive screening process and competitive bids, and often extends for several months. LNG shipping contracts are awarded based upon a variety of factors relating to the vessel operator, including:

 

 

We compete for providing marine transportation services for potential LNG projects with a number of experienced companies, including state-sponsored entities and major energy companies affiliated with the LNG project requiring LNG shipping services. Many of these competitors have significantly greater

financial resources than we do or Teekay Shipping Corporation does. We anticipate that an increasing number of marine transportation companies — including many with strong reputations and extensive resources and experience — will enter the LNG transportation sector. This increased competition may cause greater price competition for time charters. As a result of these factors, we may be unable to expand our relationships with existing customers or to obtain new customers on a profitable basis, if at all, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and our ability to make required payments on our debt securities and cash distributions on our common units.

 

 

We have agreed to purchase Teekay Shipping Corporation’s 70% interest in Teekay Nakilat Corporation, which through its subsidiaries will lease under capital leases the three RasGas II LNG newbuilding carriers, in connection with their deliveries scheduled for the fourth quarter of 2006 and the first half of 2007. The delivery of these vessels, or any other newbuildings we may order or otherwise acquire, could be delayed, which would delay our receipt of revenues under the time charters for the vessels. In addition, under some of our charters if our delivery of a vessel to our customer is delayed, we may be required to pay liquidated damages in amounts equal to or, under some charters, almost double, the hire rate during the delay. For prolonged delays, the customer may terminate the time charter and, in addition to the resulting loss of revenues, we may be responsible for additional, substantial liquidated damages.

 

Our receipt of newbuildings could be delayed because of:

 

 

If delivery of a vessel is materially delayed, it could adversely affect our results or operations and financial condition and our ability to make required payments on our debt securities and cash distributions on our common units.

 

 

LNG shipping historically has been transacted with long-term, fixed-rate time charters, usually with terms ranging from 20 to 25 years. One of our principal strategies is to enter into additional long-term, fixed-rate LNG time charters. However, the number of spot and short-term charters has been increasing, with LNG charters under 12 months in duration growing from less than 2% of the market in the late 1990s to approximately 13% in 2005.

 

If an active spot or short-term market continues to develop, we may have increased difficulty entering into long-term, fixed-rate time charters for our LNG vessels and, as a result, our cash flow may decrease

and be less stable. In addition, an active short-term or spot LNG market may require us to enter into charters based on changing market prices, as opposed to contracts based on a fixed rate, which could result in a decrease in our cash flow in periods when the market price for shipping LNG is depressed or insufficient funds are available to cover our financing costs for related vessels.

 

 

Vessel values for LNG carriers and Suezmax oil tankers can fluctuate substantially over time due to a number of different factors, including:

 

 

If a charter terminates, we may be unable to re-deploy the vessel at attractive rates and, rather than continue to incur costs to maintain and finance it, may seek to dispose of it. Our inability to dispose of the vessel at a reasonable value could result in a loss on its sale and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

 

 

Our growth strategy includes selectively acquiring existing LNG carriers or LNG shipping businesses. Historically, there have been very few purchases of existing vessels and businesses in the LNG shipping industry. Factors that may contribute to a limited number of acquisition opportunities in the LNG industry in the near term include the relatively small number of independent LNG fleet owners and the limited number of LNG carriers not subject to existing long-term charter contracts. In addition, competition from other companies could reduce our acquisition opportunities or cause us to pay higher prices.

 

Any acquisition of a vessel or business may not be profitable to us at or after the time we acquire it and may not generate cash flow sufficient to justify our investment. In addition, our acquisition growth strategy exposes us to risks that may harm our business, financial condition and operating results, including risks that we may:

 

 

Unlike newbuildings, existing vessels typically do not carry warranties as to their condition. While we generally inspect existing vessels prior to purchase, such an inspection would normally not provide us with as much knowledge of a vessel’s condition as we would possess if it had been built for us and operated by us during its life. Repairs and maintenance costs for existing vessels are difficult to predict and may be substantially higher than for vessels we have operated since they were built. These costs could decrease our cash flow and reduce our liquidity.

 

 

Terrorist attacks, such as the attacks that occurred in the United States on September 11, 2001 and the bombings in Spain on March 11, 2004 and in England on July 7, 2005, and the current conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan and other current and future conflicts, may adversely affect our business, operating results, financial condition, ability to raise capital and future growth. Continuing hostilities in the Middle East may lead to additional armed conflicts or to further acts of terrorism and civil disturbance in the United States, Spain or elsewhere, which may contribute further to economic instability and disruption of LNG and oil production and distribution, which could result in reduced demand for our services.

 

In addition, LNG and oil facilities, shipyards, vessels, pipelines and oil and gas fields could be targets of future terrorist attacks. Any such attacks could lead to, among other things, bodily injury or loss of life, vessel or other property damage, increased vessel operational costs, including insurance costs, and the inability to transport LNG, natural gas and oil to or from certain locations. Terrorist attacks, war or other events beyond our control that adversely affect the distribution, production or transportation of LNG or oil to be shipped by us could entitle our customers to terminate our charter contracts, which would harm our cash flow and our business.

 

Terrorist attacks, or the perception that LNG facilities and LNG carriers are potential terrorist targets, could materially and adversely affect expansion of LNG infrastructure and the continued supply of LNG to the United States and other countries. Concern that LNG facilities may be targeted for attack by terrorists has contributed to significant community and environmental resistance to the construction of a number of LNG facilities, primarily in North America. If a terrorist incident involving an LNG facility or LNG carrier did occur, in addition to the possible effects identified in the previous paragraph, the incident may adversely affect construction of additional LNG facilities in the United States and other countries or result in the temporary or permanent closing of various LNG facilities currently in operation.

 

 

Because our operations are primarily conducted outside of the United States, they may be affected by economic, political and governmental conditions in the countries where we are engaged in business or where our vessels are registered. Any disruption caused by these factors could harm our business. In particular, we derive a substantial portion of our revenues from shipping LNG and oil from politically unstable regions. Past political conflicts in these regions, particularly in the Arabian Gulf, have included attacks on ships, mining of waterways and other efforts to disrupt shipping in the area. In addition to acts of terrorism, vessels trading in this and other regions have also been subject, in limited instances, to piracy.

 

Future hostilities or other political instability in the Arabian Gulf or other regions where we operate or may operate could have a material adverse effect on the growth of our business, results of operations and financial condition and our ability to make required payments on our debt securities and cash distributions on our common units. In addition, tariffs, trade embargoes and other economic sanctions by Spain, the United States or other countries against countries in the Middle East, Southeast Asia or elsewhere as a result of terrorist attacks, hostilities or otherwise may limit trading activities with those countries, which could also harm our business and ability to make cash distributions.

 

Our vessels and their cargoes are at risk of being damaged or lost because of events such as:

 

 

An accident involving any of our vessels could result in any of the following:

 

 

Any of these results could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

 

 

The operation of LNG carriers and oil tankers is inherently risky. Although we carry hull and machinery (marine and war risks) and protection and indemnity insurance, all risks may not be adequately insured against, and any particular claim may not be paid. In addition, we do not carry insurance on our oil tankers covering the loss of revenues resulting from vessel off-hire time based on its cost compared to our off-hire experience. Commencing January 1, 2006, Teekay Shipping Corporation began providing off-hire insurance for our LNG carriers. Any claims covered by insurance would be subject to deductibles, and since it is possible that a large number of claims may be brought, the aggregate amount of these deductibles could be material. Certain of our insurance coverage is maintained through mutual protection and indemnity associations, and as a member of such associations we may be required to make additional payments over and above budgeted premiums if member claims exceed association reserves.

 

We may be unable to procure adequate insurance coverage at commercially reasonable rates in the future. For example, more stringent environmental regulations have led in the past to increased costs for, and in the future may result in the lack of availability of, insurance against risks of environmental damage or pollution. A catastrophic oil spill or marine disaster could result in losses that exceed our insurance coverage, which could harm our business, financial condition and operating results. Any uninsured or underinsured loss could harm our business and financial condition. In addition, our insurance may be voidable by the insurers as a result of certain of our actions, such as our ships failing to maintain certification with applicable maritime self-regulatory organizations.

 

Changes in the insurance markets attributable to terrorist attacks may also make certain types of insurance more difficult for us to obtain. In addition, the insurance that may be available may be significantly more expensive than our existing coverage.

 

Our operations are affected by extensive and changing environmental protection laws and other regulations and international conventions. We have incurred, and expect to continue to incur, substantial expenses in complying with these laws and regulations, including expenses for vessel modifications and changes in operating procedures. Additional laws and regulations may be adopted that could limit our ability to do business or further increase our costs. In addition, failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations may result in administrative and civil penalties, criminal sanctions or the suspension or termination of our operations.

 

The United States Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (or OPA 90), for instance, increased expenses for us and others in our industry. OPA 90 provides for potentially unlimited joint, several and strict liability for owners, operators and demise or bareboat charterers for oil pollution and related damages in U.S. waters, which include the U.S. territorial sea and the 200-nautical mile exclusive economic zone around the United States. OPA 90 applies to discharges of any oil from a vessel, including discharges of oil tanker cargoes and discharges of fuel and lubricants from an oil tanker or LNG carrier. To comply with OPA 90, vessel owners generally incur increased costs in meeting additional maintenance and inspection requirements, in developing contingency arrangements for potential spills and in obtaining required insurance coverage. OPA 90 requires vessel owners and operators of vessels operating in U.S. waters to establish and maintain with the U.S. Coast Guard evidence of insurance or of qualification as a self-insurer or other acceptable evidence of financial responsibility sufficient to meet certain potential liabilities under OPA 90 and the U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (or CERCLA), which imposes similar liabilities upon owners, operators and bareboat charterers of vessels from which a discharge of “hazardous substances” (other than oil) occurs. While LNG should not be considered a hazardous substance under CERCLA, additives to fuel oil or lubricants used on LNG carriers might fall within its scope. Under OPA 90 and CERCLA, owners, operators and bareboat charterers are jointly, severally and strictly liable for costs of cleanup and damages resulting from a discharge or threatened discharge within U.S. waters. This means we may be subject to liability even if we are not negligent or at fault.

 

Most states in the United States bordering on a navigable waterway have enacted legislation providing for potentially unlimited strict liability without regard to fault for the discharge of pollutants within their waters. An oil spill or other event could result in significant liability, including fines, penalties, criminal liability and costs for natural resource damages. The potential for these releases could increase to the extent we increase our operations in U.S. waters.

 

OPA 90 and CERCLA do not preclude claimants from seeking damages for the discharge of oil and hazardous substances under other applicable law, including maritime tort law. Such claims could include attempts to characterize seaborne transportation of LNG as an ultra-hazardous activity, which attempts, if successful, would lead to our being strictly liable for damages resulting from that activity.

 

In addition, we believe that the heightened environmental, quality and security concerns of insurance underwriters, regulators and charterers will generally lead to additional regulatory requirements, including enhanced risk assessment and security requirements and greater inspection and safety requirements on all vessels in the LNG carrier and oil tanker markets.

 

 

We are paid in Euros under some of our charters, and a majority of our vessel operating expenses and general and administrative expenses currently are denominated in Euros, which is primarily a function of the nationality of our crew and administrative staff. We also make payments under two Euro-denominated term loans. If the amount of our Euro-denominated obligations exceeds our Euro-denominated revenues, we must convert other currencies, primarily the U.S. Dollar, into Euros. An increase in the strength of the Euro relative to the U.S. Dollar would require us to convert more U.S. Dollars to Euros to satisfy those obligations, which would cause us to have less cash available to make required payments on our debt

securities and for distribution on our common units. In addition, if we do not have sufficient U.S. Dollars, we may be required to convert Euros into U.S. Dollars for payments under any U.S. Dollar-denominated debt securities or for distributions to unitholders. An increase in the strength of the U.S. Dollar relative to the Euro could cause us to have less cash available for these payments and distributions in this circumstance. We have not entered into currency swaps or forward contracts or similar derivatives to mitigate this risk.

 

Because we report our operating results in U.S. Dollars, changes in the value of the U.S. Dollar relative to the Euro also result in fluctuations in our reported revenues and earnings. In addition, under U.S. accounting guidelines, all foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities such as cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, restricted cash, accounts payable, long-term debt and capital lease obligations are revalued and reported based on the prevailing exchange rate at the end of the period. This revaluation historically has caused us to report significant non-monetary foreign currency exchange gains or losses each period. The primary source for these gains and losses is our Euro-denominated term loans. In 2003 and 2004 and the first half of 2006, we reported foreign currency exchange losses of $71.5 million, $60.8 million and $28.2 million, respectively. In 2005, we reported a foreign currency exchange gain of $81.8 million.

 

 

A significant portion of our seafarers, and the seafarers employed by Teekay Shipping Corporation and its other affiliates that crew our vessels, are employed under collective bargaining agreements, which expire at varying times through 2008. The collective bargaining agreement for our Spanish Suezmax tanker crew members (covering five Suezmax tankers) expires at the end of 2008. We may be subject to similar labor agreements in the future. We may be subject to labor disruptions in the future if our relationships deteriorate with our seafarers or the unions that represent them. Our collective bargaining agreements may not prevent labor disruptions, particularly when the agreements are being renegotiated. Any labor disruptions could harm our operations and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and our ability to make required payments on our debt securities and cash distributions on our common units.

 

 

We rely exclusively on the cash flow generated from our LNG carriers and Suezmax oil tankers that operate in the LNG and oil marine transportation business. Due to our lack of diversification, an adverse development in the LNG or oil shipping industry would have a significantly greater impact on our financial condition and results of operations than if we maintained more diverse assets or lines of business.

 

 

Teekay Shipping Corporation and its affiliates may engage in competition with us. Pursuant to the omnibus agreement, Teekay Shipping Corporation and its controlled affiliates (other than us and our subsidiaries) generally have agreed not to own, operate or charter LNG carriers without the consent of our general partner. The omnibus agreement, however, allows Teekay Shipping Corporation or any of such controlled affiliates to:

 

 

 

If we decline the offer to purchase the LNG carriers and time charters described above, Teekay Shipping Corporation may own and operate the LNG carriers, but may not expand that portion of its business.

 

In addition, pursuant to the omnibus agreement, Teekay Shipping Corporation or any of its controlled affiliates (other than us and our subsidiaries) may:

 

 

If there is a change of control of Teekay Shipping Corporation, the non-competition provisions of the omnibus agreement may terminate, which termination could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and our ability to make required payments on our debt securities and cash distributions on our common units.

 

 

Teekay Shipping Corporation, which owns and controls our general partner, indirectly owns the 2% general partner interest and currently owns a 67.8% limited partner interest in us. Conflicts of interest may arise between Teekay Shipping Corporation and its affiliates, including our general partner, on the one hand, and us and our securityholders, on the other hand. As a result of these conflicts, our general partner may favor its own interests and the interests of its affiliates over the interests of our securityholders. These conflicts include, among others, the following situations:

 

 

 

 

Our partnership agreement contains provisions that reduce the standards to which our general partner would otherwise be held by Marshall Islands law. For example, our partnership agreement:

 

 

In order to become a limited partner of our partnership, a common unitholder is required to agree to be bound by the provisions in the partnership agreement, including the provisions discussed above.

 

 

Prior to making any distribution on the common units, we pay fees for services provided to us and certain of our subsidiaries by certain subsidiaries of Teekay Shipping Corporation, and we reimburse our general partner for all expenses it incurs on our behalf. These fees are negotiated on our behalf by our general partner, and our general partner also determines the amounts it is reimbursed. These fees and expenses include all costs incurred in providing certain advisory, ship management, technical and administrative services to us and certain of our subsidiaries. In addition, our general partner and its affiliates may provide us with other services for which the general partner or its affiliates may charge us fees, and we may pay Teekay Shipping Corporation “incentive fees” pursuant to the omnibus agreement with it to reward and motivate Teekay Shipping Corporation for pursuing LNG projects that we may elect to undertake. The payment of fees to Teekay Shipping Corporation and its subsidiaries and reimbursement of expenses to our general partner could adversely affect our ability to make required payments on our debt securities and to pay cash distributions to our common unitholders.

 

 

Unlike the holders of common stock in a corporation, unitholders have only limited voting rights on matters affecting our business and, therefore, limited ability to influence management’s decisions regarding our business. Unitholders did not elect our general partner or its board of directors and will have no right to elect our general partner or its board of directors on an annual or other continuing basis. The board of directors of our general partner is chosen by Teekay Shipping Corporation. Furthermore, if the unitholders are dissatisfied with the performance of our general partner, they will have little ability to remove our general partner. As a result of these limitations, the price at which the common units will trade could be diminished because of the absence or reduction of a takeover premium in the trading price.

 

The vote of the holders of at least 66-2/3% of all outstanding units voting together as a single class is required to remove the general partner. Teekay Shipping Corporation currently owns 67.8% of our outstanding units. Also, if the general partner is removed without cause during the subordination period and units held by the general partner and Teekay Shipping Corporation are not voted in favor of that removal, all remaining subordinated units will automatically convert into common units and any existing arrearages on the common units will be extinguished. A removal of the general partner under these circumstances would adversely affect the common units by prematurely eliminating their distribution and liquidation preference over the subordinated units, which would otherwise have continued until we had met certain distribution and performance tests. Cause is narrowly defined to mean that a court of competent jurisdiction has entered a final, non-appealable judgment finding the general partner liable for actual fraud or willful or wanton misconduct in its capacity as our general partner. Cause does not include most cases of charges of poor management of the business, so the removal of the general partner because of the unitholders’ dissatisfaction with the general partner’s performance in managing our partnership will most likely result in the termination of the subordination period.

 

Furthermore, unitholders’ voting rights are further restricted by the partnership agreement provision providing that any units held by a person that owns 20% or more of any class of units then outstanding, other than the general partner, its affiliates, their transferees, and persons who acquired such units with the prior approval of the board of directors of the general partner, cannot vote on any matter. Our partnership agreement also contains provisions limiting the ability of unitholders to call meetings or to acquire information about our operations, as well as other provisions limiting the unitholders’ ability to influence the manner or direction of management.

 

Our general partner may transfer its general partner interest to a third party in a merger or in a sale of all or substantially all of its assets without the consent of the unitholders. In addition, our partnership agreement does not restrict the ability of the members of our general partner from transferring their respective membership interests in our general partner to a third party. In the event of any such transfer, the new members of our general partner would be in a position to replace the board of directors and officers of our general partner with their own choices and to control the decisions taken by the board of directors and officers.

 

 

The operating and financial restrictions and covenants in our financing arrangements and any future financing agreements could adversely affect our ability to finance future operations or capital needs or to engage, expand or pursue our business activities. For example, the arrangements may restrict our ability to:

 

 

In addition, some of our financing arrangements require our subsidiaries to maintain restricted cash deposits and maintain minimal levels of tangible net worth. Our ability to comply with the covenants and restrictions contained in our debt instruments may be affected by events beyond our control, including prevailing economic, financial and industry conditions. If market or other economic conditions deteriorate, our ability to comply with these covenants may be impaired. If we are in breach of any of the restrictions, covenants, ratios or tests in our financing agreements, a significant portion of our obligations may become immediately due and payable, and our lenders’ commitment to make further loans to us may terminate. We might not have, or be able to obtain, sufficient funds to make these accelerated payments. In addition, our obligations under an existing revolving credit facility are secured by certain of our assets, and if we are unable to repay our debt under the credit facility, the lenders could seek to foreclose on those assets.

 

 

Our payment of principal and interest on our debt and capital lease obligations will reduce cash available for distribution on our units. In addition, a number of our financing agreements prohibit the payment of distributions upon the occurrence of the following events, among others:

 

 

 

We anticipate that any subsequent refinancing of our current debt or any new debt will have similar restrictions.

 

 

Our partnership agreement allows us to make working capital borrowings to pay distributions. Accordingly, we can make distributions on all our units even though cash generated by our operations may not be sufficient to pay such distributions. We are required to reduce all working capital borrowings for this purpose under our revolving credit agreement to zero for a period of at least 15 consecutive days once each 12-month period. Any working capital borrowings by us to make distributions will reduce the amount of working capital borrowings we can make for operating our business.

 

 

Under some circumstances, unitholders may have to repay amounts wrongfully distributed to them. Under the Marshall Islands Limited Partnership Act (or Marshall Islands Act), we may not make a distribution to our unitholders if the distribution would cause our liabilities to exceed the fair value of our assets. Marshall Islands law provides that for a period of three years from the date of the impermissible distribution limited partners who received the distribution and who knew at the time of the distribution that it violated Marshall Islands law will be liable to the limited partnership for the distribution amount. Assignees of partnership interests who become limited partners are liable for the obligations of the assignor to make contributions to the partnership that are known to the assignee at the time it became a limited partner and for unknown obligations if the liabilities could be determined from the partnership agreement. Liabilities to partners on account of their partnership interest and liabilities that are non-recourse to the partnership are not counted for purposes of determining whether a distribution is permitted.

 

 

Our partnership affairs are governed by our partnership agreement and by the Marshall Islands Act. The provisions of the Marshall Islands Act resemble provisions of the limited partnership laws of a number of states in the United States, most notably Delaware. The Marshall Islands Act also provides that it is to be interpreted according to the non-statutory law of the State of Delaware. There have been, however, few, if any, court cases in the Marshall Islands interpreting the Marshall Islands Act, in contrast to Delaware, which has a fairly well-developed body of case law interpreting its limited partnership statute. Accordingly, we cannot predict whether Marshall Islands courts would reach the same conclusions as the courts in Delaware. For example, the rights of our unitholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our general partner under Marshall Islands law are not as clearly established as under judicial precedent in existence in Delaware. As a result, unitholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions by our general partner and its officers and directors than would unitholders of a limited partnership formed in the United States.

 

We are organized under the laws of the Marshall Islands, and all of our assets are located outside of the United States. Our business is operated primarily from our offices in the Bahamas and Spain. In addition, our general partner is a Marshall Islands limited liability company and all but four of its directors and officers are non-residents of the United States, and all or a substantial portion of the assets of these non-residents are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for you to bring an action against us or against these individuals in the United States if you believe that your rights have been infringed under securities laws or otherwise. Even if you are successful in bringing an action of this kind, the laws of the Marshall Islands and of other jurisdictions may prevent or restrict you from enforcing a judgment against our assets or the assets of our general partner or its directors and officers.

 

 

In the past, purchasers of our common units have experienced immediate and substantial dilution of their ownership interest in us. This dilution results primarily because the assets contributed by our general partner and its affiliates are recorded at their historical cost, and not their fair value, in accordance with GAAP. Depending on whether the offering price for any common units exceeds the pro forma net tangible book value per common unit, you could incur immediate and substantial dilution.

 

 

Our general partner, without the approval of our unitholders, may cause us to issue an unlimited number of additional units or other equity securities of equal or senior rank. The issuance by us of additional common units or other equity securities will have the following effects:

 

 

 

Our partnership agreement requires our general partner to deduct from operating surplus cash reserves that it determines are necessary to fund our future operating expenditures. These reserves affect the amount of cash available for distribution to our common unitholders. Our general partner may establish reserves for distributions on the subordinated units, but only if those reserves will not prevent us from distributing the full minimum quarterly distribution, plus any arrearages, on the common units for the following four quarters. The partnership agreement requires our general partner each quarter to deduct from operating surplus estimated maintenance capital expenditures, as opposed to actual expenditures, which could reduce the amount of available cash for distribution to the common unitholders.

 

If at any time our general partner and its affiliates own more than 80% of the common units, our general partner will have the right, but not the obligation (which it may assign to any of its affiliates or to us), to acquire all, but not less than all, of the common units held by unaffiliated persons at a price not less than their then-current market price. As a result, common unitholders may be required to sell their common units at an undesirable time or price and may not receive any return on their investment. Common unitholders may also incur a tax liability upon a sale of their units.

 

Teekay Shipping Corporation currently owns 43.2% of our common units. At the end of the subordination period (assuming no additional issuances of common units and conversion of our subordinated units into common units), Teekay Shipping Corporation will own 67.1% of the common units. Teekay Shipping Corporation will also acquire additional common units if it elects to receive common units in satisfaction of obligations owed to it by us, such as in connection with the sale to us of its 70% interest in Teekay Nakilat Corporation, which through its subsidiaries will lease under capital leases the three RasGas II LNG newbuilding carriers. Accordingly, after subordinated units are converted to common units our general partner and its affiliates may own a sufficient percentage of our common units to enable our general partner to exercise its call right.

 

 

Our partnership agreement restricts unitholders’ voting rights by providing that any units held by a person that owns 20% or more of any class of units then outstanding, other than our general partner, its affiliates, their transferees and persons who acquired such units with the prior approval of the board of directors of our general partner, cannot vote on any matter. The partnership agreement also contains provisions limiting the ability of unitholders to call meetings or to acquire information about our operations, as well as other provisions limiting the unitholders’ ability to influence the manner or direction of management.

 

 

As a limited partner in a partnership organized under the laws of the Marshall Islands, common unitholders could be held liable for our obligations to the same extent as a general partner if they participate in the “control” of our business. Our general partner generally has unlimited liability for the obligations of the partnership, such as its debts and environmental liabilities, except for those contractual obligations of the partnership that are expressly made without recourse to our general partner. In addition, the Marshall Islands Act provides that, under some circumstances, a unitholder may be liable to us for the amount of a distribution for a period of three years from the date of the distribution. In addition, the limitations on the liability of holders of limited partner interests for the obligations of a limited partnership have not been clearly established in some jurisdictions in which we do business.

 

 

Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness and to fund planned expenditures will depend on our ability to generate cash. This, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control.

 

We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flow from operations or borrow amounts under our revolving credit facilities sufficient to fund our liquidity needs. We may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness on or before maturity, which we may be unable to do on commercially reasonable terms, if at all.

 

We are a holding company. We conduct our operations through our subsidiaries. As a result, our cash flow and ability to service our debt depends on the earnings of our subsidiaries and their distribution of earnings, loans or other payments to us. Any payment of dividends, distributions, loans or other payments from our subsidiaries to us could be subject to statutory or contractual restrictions. If we are unable to obtain funds from our subsidiaries we may not be able to pay interest or principal on our debt securities when due or to obtain the necessary funds from other sources.

 

 

As of June 30, 2006, our consolidated debt, capital lease obligations and debt related to newbuilding vessels to be acquired totaled $1.4 billion. In addition, we have the capacity to borrow significant additional amounts under our credit facilities. These facilities may be used by us for general partnership purposes. If we are awarded contracts for new LNG projects, our consolidated debt and capital lease obligations will increase, perhaps significantly. We will continue to have the ability to incur additional debt, subject to limitations in our credit facilities. Our level of debt could have important consequences to us, including the following:

 

 

Our ability to service our debt will depend upon, among other things, our future financial and operating performance, which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and financial, business, regulatory and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. If our operating results are not sufficient to service our current or future indebtedness, we will be forced to take actions such as reducing distributions, reducing or delaying our business activities, acquisitions, investments or capital expenditures, selling assets, restructuring or refinancing our debt, or seeking additional equity capital or bankruptcy protection. We may be unable to effect any of these remedies on satisfactory terms, or at all.

 

 

We anticipate that any debt securities we may offer pursuant to this prospectus will be our general unsecured obligations, and that any guarantees of our debt securities will be the general unsecured obligations of the applicable Subsidiary Guarantors, and effectively subordinated to any secured debt that we or they may have, to the extent of the value of the assets securing that debt. In the event any of our subsidiaries do not guarantee our debt securities, those debt securities will be effectively subordinated to the liabilities of any of those non-guarantor subsidiaries.

 

If we are declared bankrupt or insolvent, or are liquidated, the holders of our secured debt will be entitled to be paid from our assets before any payment may be made with respect to our unsecured debt

securities. If any of these events occurs, we may not have sufficient assets to pay amounts due on our secured debt and our debt securities.

 

 

Our debt securities may be guaranteed by certain of our subsidiaries. Under U.S. federal bankruptcy laws and comparable provisions of state fraudulent transfer laws, a guarantee by a subsidiary could be voided, or claims in respect of a guarantee could be subordinated to all other debts of that guarantor if, among other things, the guarantor, at the time it incurred the indebtedness evidenced by its guarantee received less than reasonably equivalent fair value or fair consideration for the incurrence of such guarantee, and

 

 

In addition, any payment by that subsidiary guarantor pursuant to its guarantee could be voided and required to be returned to the guarantor, or to a fund for the benefit of the creditors of the guarantor. The measures of insolvency for purposes of these fraudulent transfer laws will vary depending upon the law applied in any proceeding to determine whether a fraudulent transfer has occurred. Generally, however, a guarantor would be considered insolvent if:

 

 

In addition to the following risk factors, you should read “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences” for a more complete discussion of expected material U.S. federal income tax consequences of owning and disposing of our securities.

 

 

Assuming that you are a U.S. citizen, resident or other U.S. taxpayer, you will be required to pay U.S. federal income taxes and, in some cases, U.S. state and local income taxes on your share of our taxable income, whether or not you receive cash distributions from us. You may not receive cash distributions from us equal to your share of our taxable income or even equal to the actual tax liability that results from your share of our taxable income.

 

 

If common unitholders sell their common units, they will recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes that is equal to the difference between the amount realized and their tax basis in those common units. Prior distributions in excess of the total net taxable income allocated decrease a common

unitholder’s tax basis and will, in effect, become taxable income if common units are sold at a price greater than their tax basis, even if the price received is less than the original cost. Assuming we are not treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, a substantial portion of the amount realized on a sale of units, whether or not representing gain, may be ordinary income.

 

 

The anticipated after-tax benefit of an investment in the common units may be reduced if we cease to be treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

 

If we cease to be treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we would be treated as becoming a corporation for such purposes, and common unitholders could suffer material adverse tax or economic consequences, including the following:

 

 

 

Investments in common units by U.S. tax-exempt entities, including individual retirement accounts (known as IRAs), other retirements plans and non-U.S. persons raise issues unique to them. Assuming we are classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, virtually all of our income allocated to organizations exempt from U.S. federal income tax will be unrelated business taxable income and generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax. In addition, non-U.S. persons may be subject to a 4% U.S. federal income tax on the U.S. source portion of our gross income attributable to transportation that begins or ends in the United States, or distributions to them may be reduced on account of withholding of U.S. federal income tax by us in the event we are treated as having a fixed place of business in the United States or otherwise earn U.S. effectively connected income, unless an exemption applies and they file U.S. federal income tax returns to claim such exemption.

 

We will be considered to have been terminated for U.S. federal income tax purposes if there is a sale or exchange of 50% or more of the total interests in our capital or profits within any 12-month period. Our termination would, among other things, result in the closing of our taxable year for all unitholders and could result in a deferral of depreciation deductions allowable in computing our taxable income. Please read “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences — Disposition of Common Units — Constructive Termination.”

 

 

We intend that our affairs and the business of each of our subsidiaries is conducted and operated in a manner that minimizes foreign income taxes imposed upon us and our subsidiaries or which may be imposed upon you as a result of owning our common units. However, there is a risk that common unitholders will be subject to tax in one or more countries, including Canada, as a result of owning our common units if, under the laws of any such country, we are considered to be carrying on business there. If common unitholders are subject to tax in any such country, common unitholders may be required to file a tax return with, and pay taxes to, that country based on their allocable share of our income. We may be required to reduce distributions to common unitholders on account of any withholding obligations imposed upon us by that country in respect of such allocation to common unitholders. The United States may not allow a tax credit for any foreign income taxes that common unitholders directly or indirectly incur. Any foreign taxes imposed on us or any of our subsidiaries will reduce our cash available for common unitholders.

 

Unless we specify otherwise in any prospectus supplement, we will use the net proceeds from our sale of securities covered by this prospectus for general partnership purposes, which may include, among other things:

 

 

The actual application of proceeds from the sale of any particular offering of securities covered by this prospectus will be described in the applicable prospectus supplement relating to the offering.

 

The following table presents our consolidated ratio of earnings to fixed charges for each of the periods indicated:

 

 

 

 

For purposes of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges:

 

 

 

subtracting the following items:

 

 

 

As of September 1, 2006, there were 20,238,072 common units outstanding, held by approximately 20 holders of record. Our common units were first offered on the New York Stock Exchange on May 5, 2005, at an initial price of $22.00 per unit. Our common units are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “TGP.”

 

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices for our common units, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange, and quarterly cash distributions declared per common unit. The last reported sale price of common units on the New York Stock Exchange on September 28, 2006 was $29.95 per common unit.

 

 

 

 

Our common units and our subordinated units represent limited partner interests in us. The holders of units are entitled to participate in partnership distributions and exercise the rights and privileges available to limited partners under our partnership agreement. For a description of the relative rights and privileges of holders of common units, holders of subordinated units and our general partner in and to partnership distributions, together with a description of the circumstances under which subordinated units convert into common units, please read “Cash Distributions.”

 

We currently have 20,238,072 common units outstanding, of which 11,503,500 are held by the public and 8,734,572 are held by Teekay Shipping Corporation, which owns our general partner. We also have 14,734,572 subordinated units outstanding, for which there is no established public trading market, all of which are held by Teekay Shipping Corporation. The common units and the subordinated units represent an aggregate 98% limited partner interest and the general partner interest represents a 2% general partner interest in us.

 

Our partnership agreement authorizes us to issue an unlimited number of additional partnership securities and rights to buy partnership securities for the consideration and on the terms and conditions determined by our general partner without the approval of our unitholders.

 

We may fund acquisitions through the issuance of additional common units or other equity securities. Holders of any additional common units we issue will be entitled to share equally with the then-existing holders of common units in our distributions of available cash. In addition, the issuance of additional common units or other equity securities interests may dilute the value of the interests of the then-existing holders of common units in our net assets.

 

In accordance with Marshall Islands law and the provisions of our partnership agreement, we may also issue additional partnership securities interests that, as determined by the general partner, have special voting or other rights to which the common units are not entitled.

 

Upon issuance of additional partnership securities, our general partner will be required to make additional capital contributions to the extent necessary to maintain its 2% general partner interest in us. In addition, our general partner and its affiliates have the right, which it may from time to time assign in whole or in part to any of its affiliates, to purchase common units, subordinated units or other equity securities whenever, and on the same terms that, we issue those securities to persons other than our general partner and its affiliates, to the extent necessary to maintain its and its affiliates’ percentage interest, including its interest represented by common units and subordinated units, that existed immediately prior to each issuance. Other holders of common units do not have similar preemptive rights to acquire additional common units or other partnership securities.

 

Unlike the holders of common stock in a corporation, the holders of our units have only limited voting rights on matters affecting our business. They have no right to elect our general partner (who manages our operations and activities) or the directors of our general partner on an annual or other continuing basis. On those matters that are submitted to a vote of unitholders, each record holder of a unit may vote according to the holder’s percentage interest in us, although additional limited partner interests having special voting rights could be issued. However, if at any time any person or group, other than our general partner and its affiliates (or a direct or subsequently approved transferee of our general partner or its affiliates or a transferee approved by the board of directors of our general partner) acquires, in the aggregate, beneficial ownership of 20% or more of any class of units then outstanding, that person or group will lose voting rights on all of its units and the units may not be voted on any matter and will not be considered to be outstanding

when sending notices of a meeting of unitholders, calculating required votes, determining the presence of a quorum, or for other similar purposes.

 

Holders of our subordinated units sometimes vote as a single class together with the holders of our common units and sometimes vote as a class separate from the holders of common units. Holders of subordinated units, like holders of common units, have very limited voting rights. During the subordination period, common units (excluding common units held by our general partner and its affiliates) and subordinated units each vote separately as a class generally on the following matters:

 

 

Neither the subordinated units nor any common units held by our general partners or any of its affiliates are entitled to vote on approval of the withdrawal of our general partner or the transfer by our general partner of its general partner interest or incentive distribution rights under some circumstances. Removal of our general partner requires:

 

 

Except as described above regarding a person or group owning 20% or more of any class of units then outstanding, unitholders or assignees who are record holders of units on the record date will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, any meetings of our limited partners and to act upon matters for which approvals may be solicited. Common units that are owned by an assignee who is a record holder, but who has not yet been admitted as a limited partner, will be voted by the general partner at the written direction of the record holder. Absent direction of this kind, the common units will not be voted, except that, in the case of common units held by our general partner on behalf of unpermitted citizen assignees, our general partner will distribute the votes on those common units in the same ratios as the votes of limited partners with respect to other units are cast.

 

Any action that is required or permitted to be taken by the unitholders may be taken either at a meeting of the unitholders or without a meeting if consents in writing describing the action so taken are signed by holders of the number of units necessary to authorize or take that action at a meeting. Meetings of the unitholders may be called by our general partner or by unitholders owning at least 20% of the outstanding units of the class for which a meeting is proposed. Unitholders may vote either in person or by proxy at meetings. The holders of a majority of the outstanding units of the class or classes for which a meeting has been called, represented in person or by proxy, will constitute a quorum unless any action by the unitholders requires approval by holders of a greater percentage of the units, in which case the quorum will be the greater percentage.

 

Common units held in nominee or street name account will be voted by the broker or other nominee in accordance with the instruction of the beneficial owner unless the arrangement between the beneficial owner and his nominee provides otherwise.

 

If at any time our general partner and its affiliates hold more than 80% of the then-issued and outstanding partnership securities of any class, our general partner will have the right, which it may assign in whole or in part to any of its affiliates or to us, to acquire all, but not less than all, of the remaining partnership securities of the class held by unaffiliated persons as of a record date to be selected by our general partner, on at least 10 but not more than 60 days’ notice. The purchase price in this event is the greater of: (1) the highest cash price paid by either the general partner or any of its affiliates for any partnership securities of the class purchased within the 90 days preceding the date on which our general partner first mails notice of its election to purchase those partnership securities; and (2) the current market price as of the date three days before the date the notice is mailed.

 

As a result of our general partner’s right to purchase outstanding partnership securities, a holder of partnership securities may have the holder’s partnership securities purchased at an undesirable time or price. The tax consequences to a unitholder of the exercise of this call right are the same as a sale by that unitholder of common units in the market. Please read “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences — Disposition of Common Units.”

 

Our common units are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, where they trade under the symbol “TGP.”

 

The Bank of New York serves as registrar and transfer agent for our common units. We pay all fees charged by the transfer agent for transfers of common units, except the following, which must be paid by unitholders:

 

 

There is no charge to unitholders for disbursements of our cash distributions. We will indemnify the transfer agent, its agents and each of their stockholders, directors, officers and employees against all claims and losses that may arise out of acts performed or omitted for its activities in that capacity, except for any liability due to any gross negligence or intentional misconduct of the indemnified person or entity.

 

Transfers of a common unit will not be recorded by the transfer agent or recognized by us unless the transferee executes and delivers a transfer application. By executing and delivering a transfer application, the transferee of common units:

 

 

An assignee will become a substituted limited partner of our partnership for the transferred common units automatically upon the recording of the transfer on our books and records. Our general partner will cause any unrecorded transfers for which a completed and duly executed transfer application has been received to be recorded on our books and records no less frequently than quarterly.

 

A transferee’s broker, agent or nominee may complete, execute and deliver a transfer application. We are entitled to treat the nominee holder of a common unit as the absolute owner. In that case, the beneficial holder’s rights are limited solely to those that it has against the nominee holder as a result of any agreement between the beneficial owner and the nominee holder.

 

Common units are securities and are transferable according to the laws governing transfer of securities. In addition to other rights acquired upon transfer, the transferor gives the transferee the right to request admission as a substituted limited partner in our partnership for the transferred common units. A purchaser or transferee of common units who does not execute and deliver a transfer application obtains only:

 

 

Thus, a purchaser or transferee of common units who does not execute and deliver a transfer application:

 

 

The transferor of common units has a duty to provide the transferee with all information that may be necessary to transfer the common units. The transferor does not have a duty to ensure the execution of the transfer application by the transferee and has no liability or responsibility if the transferee neglects or chooses not to execute and forward the transfer application to the transfer agent.

 

Until a common unit has been transferred on our books, we and the transfer agent may treat the record holder of the unit as the absolute owner for all purposes, except as otherwise required by law or stock exchange regulations.

 

Merger, Sale, or Other Disposition of Assets.  A merger or consolidation of us requires the consent of our general partner, in addition to the unitholder vote described above under “— Meetings; Voting.” However, our general partner will have no duty or obligation to consent to any merger or consolidation and may decline to do so free of any fiduciary duty or obligation whatsoever to us or the limited partners, including any duty to act in good faith or in the best interests of us or the limited partners. In addition, although our partnership agreement generally requires the unitholder vote described above “— Meetings; Voting” for the sale, exchange or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets in a single transaction or a series of related transactions, our general partner may mortgage, pledge, hypothecate or grant a security interest in all or substantially all of our assets without that approval. Our general partner may also sell all or substantially all of our assets under a foreclosure or other realization upon those encumbrances without that approval. The unitholders are not entitled to dissenters’ rights of appraisal under our partnership agreement or applicable law in the event of a conversion, merger or consolidation, a sale of all or substantially all of our assets, or any other transaction or event.

 

Registration Rights.  Under our partnership agreement, we have agreed to register for resale under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933 and applicable state securities laws any common units, subordinated units or other partnership securities proposed to be sold by our general partner or any of its affiliates or their

assignees if an exemption from the registration requirements is not otherwise available or advisable. These registration rights continue for two years following any withdrawal or removal of Teekay GP L.L.C. as our general partner. We are obligated to pay all expenses incidental to the registration, excluding underwriting discounts and commissions.

 

A copy of our partnership agreement is filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. A summary of the important provisions of our partnership agreement and the rights and privileges of our unitholders is included in our registration statement on Form 8-A/A as filed with the SEC on September 29, 2006, including any subsequent amendments or reports filed for the purpose of updating such description. Please read “Where You Can Find More Information.”

 

 

Our partnership agreement provides that within approximately 45 days after the end of each quarter we will distribute all of our available cash to unitholders of record on the applicable record date.

 

 

Available cash generally means, for each fiscal quarter, all cash on hand at the end of the quarter (including our proportionate share of cash on hand of certain subsidiaries we do not wholly own):

 

 

 

 

 

Common unitholders are entitled under our partnership agreement to receive a quarterly distribution of $0.4125 per unit, or $1.65 per year, prior to any distribution on our subordinated units to the extent we have sufficient cash from our operations after establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees and expenses, including payments to our general partner. Our general partner has the authority to determine the amount of our available cash for any quarter. This determination, as well as all determinations made by the general partner, must be made in good faith. Our general partner’s board of directors declared an increase in our quarterly distribution to $0.4625 per unit, or $1.85 per year, commencing with the first quarter of 2006. There is no guarantee that we will pay the quarterly distribution in this amount or the minimum quarterly distribution on the common units in any quarter, and we will be prohibited from making any distributions to unitholders if it would cause an event of default, or an event of default is existing, under our credit facilities.

 

 

All cash distributed to unitholders is characterized as either “operating surplus” or “capital surplus.” We treat distributions of available cash from operating surplus differently than distributions of available cash from capital surplus.

 

 

Operating surplus for any period generally means:

 

 

 

As described above, operating surplus does not only reflect actual cash on hand that is available for distribution to our unitholders. For example, it also includes a provision that enables us, if we choose, to distribute as operating surplus up to $10 million of cash we may receive from non-operating sources, such as asset sales, issuances of securities and long-term borrowings, that would otherwise be distributed as capital surplus. In addition, the effect of including, as described above, certain cash distributions on equity securities or interest payments on debt in operating surplus is to increase operating surplus by the amount of any such cash distributions or interest payments. As a result, we may also distribute as operating surplus up to the amount of any such cash distributions or interest payments of cash we receive from non-operating sources.

 

 

For purposes of determining operating surplus, maintenance capital expenditures are those capital expenditures required to maintain over the long term the operating capacity of or the revenue generated by our capital assets, and expansion capital expenditures are those capital expenditures that increase the operating capacity of or the revenue generated by our capital assets. To the extent, however, that capital expenditures associated with acquiring a new vessel increase the revenues or the operating capacity of our fleet, those capital expenditures are classified as expansion capital expenditures.

 

Examples of maintenance capital expenditures include capital expenditures associated with dry-docking a vessel or acquiring a new vessel to the extent such expenditures are incurred to maintain the operating capacity of or the revenue generated by our fleet. Maintenance capital expenditures also include interest

(and related fees) on debt incurred and distributions on equity issued to finance the construction of a replacement vessel and paid during the construction period, which we define as the period beginning on the date that we enter into a binding construction contract and ending on the earlier of the date that the replacement vessel commences commercial service or the date that the replacement vessel is abandoned or disposed of. Debt incurred to pay or equity issued to fund construction period interest payments, and distributions on such equity, also are considered maintenance capital expenditures.

 

Because our maintenance capital expenditures can be very large and vary significantly in timing, the amount of our actual maintenance capital expenditures may differ substantially from period to period, which could cause similar fluctuations in the amounts of operating surplus, adjusted operating surplus, and available cash for distribution to our unitholders if we subtracted actual maintenance capital expenditures from operating surplus each quarter. Accordingly, to eliminate the effect on operating surplus of these fluctuations, our partnership agreement requires that an amount equal to an estimate of the average quarterly maintenance capital expenditures necessary to maintain the operating capacity of or the revenue generated by our capital assets over the long term be subtracted from operating surplus each quarter, as opposed to the actual amounts spent. The amount of estimated maintenance capital expenditures deducted from operating surplus is subject to review and change by the board of directors of our general partner at least once a year, provided that any change must be approved by our conflicts committee. The estimate is made at least annually and whenever an event occurs that is likely to result in a material adjustment to the amount of our maintenance capital expenditures, such as a major acquisition or the introduction of new governmental regulations that affects our fleet. For purposes of calculating operating surplus, any adjustment to this estimate is prospective only.

 

The use of estimated maintenance capital expenditures in calculating operating surplus has the following effects:

 

 

 

Capital surplus generally is generated only by:

 

 

 

We treat all available cash distributed as coming from operating surplus until the sum of all available cash distributed since we began operations equals the operating surplus as of the most recent date of determination of available cash. We treat any amount distributed in excess of operating surplus, regardless

of its source, as capital surplus. We do not anticipate that we will make any distributions from capital surplus.

 

 

During the subordination period, which we define below, the common units will have the right to receive distributions of available cash from operating surplus in an amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution of $0.4125 per quarter, plus any arrearages in the payment of the minimum quarterly distribution on the common units from prior quarters, before any distributions of available cash from operating surplus may be made on the subordinated units. The purpose of the subordinated units is to increase the likelihood that during the subordination period there will be available cash to be distributed on the common units.

 

 

The subordination period generally will extend until the first day of any quarter, beginning after March 31, 2010, that each of the following tests are met:

 

 

If the unitholders remove our general partner without cause, the subordination period may end before March 31, 2010.

 

 

Before the end of the subordination period, 50% of the subordinated units, or up to 7,367,286 subordinated units, may convert into common units on a one-for-one basis immediately after the distribution of available cash to the partners in respect of any quarter ending on or after:

 

 

The early conversions will occur if at the end of the applicable quarter each of the following occurs:

 

 

However, the second early conversion of the subordinated units may not occur until at least one year following the first early conversion of the subordinated units.

 

For purposes of determining whether sufficient adjusted operating surplus has been generated under these conversion tests, the conflicts committee of our general partner’s board of directors may adjust adjusted operating surplus upwards or downwards if it determines in good faith that the estimated amount of maintenance capital expenditures used in the determination of operating surplus was materially incorrect, based on circumstances prevailing at the time of original determination of the estimate.

 

 

Adjusted operating surplus for any period generally means:

 

 

Adjusted operating surplus is intended to reflect the cash generated from operations during a particular period and therefore excludes net increases in working capital borrowings and net drawdowns of reserves of cash generated in prior periods.

 

 

Upon expiration of the subordination period, each outstanding subordinated unit will convert into one common unit and will then participate pro rata with the other common units in distributions of available cash. In addition, if the unitholders remove our general partner other than for cause and units held by our general partner and its affiliates are not voted in favor of such removal:

 

 

We make distributions of available cash from operating surplus for any quarter during the subordination period in the following manner:

 

 

 

We will make distributions of available cash from operating surplus for any quarter after the subordination period in the following manner:

 

 

Incentive distribution rights represent the right to receive an increasing percentage of quarterly distributions of available cash from operating surplus after the minimum quarterly distribution and the target distribution levels have been achieved. Our general partner currently holds the incentive distribution rights, but may transfer these rights separately from its general partner interest, subject to restrictions in the partnership agreement.

 

If for any quarter:

 

 

then, we will distribute any additional available cash from operating surplus for that quarter among the unitholders and our general partner in the following manner:

 

 

In each case, the amount of the target distribution set forth above is exclusive of any distributions to common unitholders to eliminate any cumulative arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly distribution. The percentage interests set forth above for our general partner include its 2% general partner interest and assume the general partner has not transferred the incentive distribution rights.

 

The following table illustrates the percentage allocations of the additional available cash from operating surplus among the unitholders and our general partner up to the various target distribution levels. The amounts set forth under “Marginal Percentage Interest in Distributions” are the percentage interests of the unitholders and our general partner in any available cash from operating surplus we distribute up to and including the corresponding amount in the column “Total Quarterly Distribution Target Amount,” until available cash from operating surplus we distribute reaches the next target distribution level, if any. The percentage interests shown for the unitholders and our general partner for the minimum quarterly

distribution are also applicable to quarterly distribution amounts that are less than the minimum quarterly distribution. The percentage interests shown for our general partner include its 2% general partner interest and assume the general partner has not transferred the incentive distribution rights.

 

 

 

We will make distributions of available cash from capital surplus, if any, in the following manner:

 

 

 

The partnership agreement treats a distribution of capital surplus as the repayment of the initial unit price from our initial public offering on May 10, 2005, which is a return of capital. That initial public offering price less any distributions of capital surplus per unit is referred to as the “unrecovered initial unit price.” Each time a distribution of capital surplus is made, the minimum quarterly distribution and the target distribution levels will be reduced in the same proportion as the corresponding reduction in the unrecovered initial unit price. Because distributions of capital surplus will reduce the minimum quarterly distribution, after any of these distributions are made, it may be easier for our general partner to receive incentive distributions and for the subordinated units to convert into common units. However, any distribution of capital surplus before the unrecovered initial unit price is reduced to zero cannot be applied to the payment of the minimum quarterly distribution or any arrearages.

 

Once we distribute capital surplus on a unit issued in our initial public offering in an amount equal to the initial public offering price for our initial public offering, we will reduce the minimum quarterly distribution and the target distribution levels to zero. We will then make all future distributions from operating surplus, with 50% being paid to the holders of units and 50% to our general partner. The percentage interests shown for our general partner include its 2% general partner interest and assume the general partner has not transferred the incentive distribution rights.

 

In addition to adjusting the minimum quarterly distribution and target distribution levels to reflect a distribution of capital surplus, if we combine our units into fewer units or subdivide our units into a greater number of units, we will proportionately adjust:

 

 

 

For example, if a two-for-one split of the common units should occur, the minimum quarterly distribution, the target distribution levels and the unrecovered initial unit price would each be reduced to 50% of its initial level and the number of common units issuable during the subordination period without a unitholder vote would double. We will not make any adjustment by reason of the issuance of additional units for cash or property.

 

In addition, if legislation is enacted or if existing law is modified or interpreted by a governmental taxing authority so that we become taxable as a corporation or otherwise subject to taxation as an entity for U.S. federal, state, local or non-U.S. income tax purposes, we will reduce the minimum quarterly distribution and the target distribution levels for each quarter by multiplying each distribution level by a fraction, the numerator of which is available cash for that quarter and the denominator of which is the sum of available cash for that quarter plus the general partner’s estimate of our aggregate liability for the quarter for such income taxes payable by reason of such legislation or interpretation. To the extent that the actual tax liability differs from the estimated tax liability for any quarter, the difference will be accounted for in subsequent quarters.

 

 

If we dissolve in accordance with the partnership agreement, we will sell or otherwise dispose of our assets in a process called liquidation. We will first apply the proceeds of liquidation to the payment of our creditors. We will distribute any remaining proceeds to the unitholders and our general partner, in accordance with their capital account balances, as adjusted to reflect any gain or loss upon the sale or other disposition of our assets in liquidation.

 

The allocations of gain and loss upon liquidation are intended, to the extent possible, to entitle the holders of outstanding common units to a preference over the holders of outstanding subordinated units upon our liquidation, to the extent required to permit common unitholders to receive their unrecovered initial unit price plus the minimum quarterly distribution for the quarter during which liquidation occurs plus any unpaid arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly distribution on the common units. However, there may not be sufficient gain upon our liquidation to enable the holders of common units to fully recover all of these amounts, even though there may be cash available for distribution to the holders of subordinated units. Any further net gain recognized upon liquidation will be allocated in a manner that takes into account the incentive distribution rights of our general partner.

 

 

The manner of the adjustment for gain is set forth in the partnership agreement. If our liquidation occurs before the end of the subordination period, we will allocate any gain to the partners in the following manner:

 

 

(1) the unrecovered initial unit price;

 

(2) the amount of the minimum quarterly distribution for the quarter during which our liquidation occurs; and

 

(3) any unpaid arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly distribution;

 

 

(1) the unrecovered initial unit price; and

 

(2) the amount of the minimum quarterly distribution for the quarter during which our liquidation occurs;

 

 

(1) the sum of the excess of the first target distribution per unit over the minimum quarterly distribution per unit for each quarter of our existence; less

 

(2) the cumulative amount per unit of any distributions of available cash from operating surplus in excess of the minimum quarterly distribution per unit that we distributed 98% to the unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to our general partner, for each quarter of our existence;

 

 

(1) the sum of the excess of the second target distribution per unit over the first target distribution per unit for each quarter of our existence; less

 

(2) the cumulative amount per unit of any distributions of available cash from operating surplus in excess of the first target distribution per unit that we distributed 85% to the unitholders, pro rata, and 15% to our general partner for each quarter of our existence;

 

 

(1) the sum of the excess of the third target distribution per unit over the second target distribution per unit for each quarter of our existence; less

 

(2) the cumulative amount per unit of any distributions of available cash from operating surplus in excess of the second target distribution per unit that we distributed 75% to the unitholders, pro rata, and 25% to our general partner for each quarter of our existence; and

 

 

The percentage interests set forth above for our general partner include its 2% general partner interest and assume the general partner has not transferred the incentive distribution rights.

 

If the liquidation occurs after the end of the subordination period, the distinction between common units and subordinated units will disappear, so that clause (3) of the second bullet point above and all of the third bullet point above will no longer be applicable.

 

 

If our liquidation occurs before the end of the subordination period, we will generally allocate any loss to our general partner and the unitholders in the following manner:

 

 

If the liquidation occurs after the end of the subordination period, the distinction between common units and subordinated units will disappear, so that the first bullet point above will no longer be applicable.

 

 

We will make adjustments to capital accounts upon the issuance of additional units. In doing so, we will allocate any unrealized and, for tax purposes, unrecognized gain or loss resulting from the adjustments to the existing unitholders and our general partner in the same manner as we allocate gain or loss upon liquidation. In the event that we make positive adjustments to the capital accounts upon the issuance of additional units, we will allocate any later negative adjustments to the capital accounts resulting from the issuance of additional units or upon our liquidation in a manner which results, to the extent possible, in our general partner’s and unitholders’ capital account balances equaling the amount which they would have been if no earlier positive adjustments to the capital accounts had been made.

 

The debt securities we may offer and sell pursuant to this prospectus will be:

 

 

Teekay LNG Partners L.P. may issue debt securities in one or more series, and Teekay LNG Finance Corp. may be the co-issuer of one or more series of debt securities. Teekay LNG Finance Corp. was incorporated under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands in August 2006 and is wholly owned by Teekay LNG Partners L.P. Its activities will be limited to co-issuing debt securities and engaging in other related activities. When used in this section “Description of Debt Securities,” the terms “we,” “us,” “our” and “issuers” refer jointly to Teekay LNG Partners L.P. and Teekay LNG Finance Corp., and the terms “Teekay LNG Partners L.P.” and “Teekay LNG Finance Corp.” refer strictly to Teekay LNG Partners L.P. and Teekay LNG Finance Corp., respectively.

 

If we offer senior debt securities, we will issue them under a senior indenture. If we issue subordinated debt securities, we will issue them under a subordinated indenture. A form of each indenture is filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. Please read “Where You Can Find More Information” for information on how to obtain copies of the indentures. We have not restated either indenture in its entirety in this description. You should read the relevant indenture because it, and not this description, controls the rights of holders of the debt securities. Capitalized terms used in this summary have the meanings specified in the respective indentures.

 

A prospectus supplement and a supplemental indenture or authorizing resolutions of our general partner’s board of directors relating to any series of debt securities that we may offer will include specific terms relating to the offering. These terms will include some or all of the following: