Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended April 30, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission File No. 0-49790
Verint Systems Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
11-3200514 |
|
|
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation
or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
330 South Service Road, Melville, New York
|
|
11747 |
|
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(631) 962-9600
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.40S of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Accelerated Filer þ
|
|
Non-Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Small Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
There were 32,794,402 shares of the registrants common stock outstanding on May 31, 2010.
Cautionary Note on Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements discussed in this report constitute forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the provisions of Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act) (which Sections were adopted as part of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). Forward-looking
statements include financial projections, statements of plans and objectives for future operations,
statements of future economic performance, and statements of assumptions relating thereto.
Forward-looking statements are often identified by future or conditional words such as will,
plans, expects, intends, believes, seeks, estimates, or anticipates, or by variations
of such words or by similar expressions. There can be no assurances that forward-looking
statements will be achieved. By their very nature, forward-looking statements involve known and
unknown risks, uncertainties, and other important factors that could cause our actual results or
conditions to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
Important risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause our actual results or
conditions to differ materially from our forward-looking statements include, among others:
|
|
|
risks relating to the filing of our Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reports,
including the occurrence of known contingencies or unforeseen events that could delay our
plan for completion of our outstanding or future filings, management distractions, and
significant expense; |
|
|
|
risk associated with the SECs initiation of an administrative proceeding on March 3,
2010 to suspend or revoke the registration of our common stock under the Exchange Act due
to our previous failure to file an annual report on either Form 10-K or Form 10-KSB since
April 25, 2005 or quarterly reports on either Form 10-Q or Form 10-QSB since December 12,
2005; |
|
|
|
risk that our credit rating could be downgraded or placed on a credit watch based on,
among other things, our financial results, delays in the filing of our periodic reports, or
the results of the SECs administrative proceeding; |
|
|
|
risks associated with being a consolidated, controlled subsidiary of Comverse
Technology, Inc. (Comverse) and formerly part of Comverses consolidated tax group,
including risk of any future impact on us resulting from Comverses special committee
investigation and restatement or related effects, and risks related to our dependence on
Comverse to provide us with accurate financial information, including with respect to
stock-based compensation expense and net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs), for our
financial statements; |
|
|
|
uncertainty regarding the impact of general economic conditions, particularly in
information technology spending, on our business; |
ii
|
|
|
risk that our financial results will cause us not to be compliant with the leverage
ratio covenant under our credit facility or that any delays in the filing of future SEC
reports could cause us not to be compliant with the financial statement delivery covenant
under our credit facility; |
|
|
|
risk that customers or partners delay or cancel orders or are unable to honor
contractual commitments due to liquidity issues, challenges in their business, or
otherwise; |
|
|
|
risk that we will experience liquidity or working capital issues and related risk that
financing sources will be unavailable to us on reasonable terms or at all; |
|
|
|
uncertainty regarding the future impact on our business of our internal investigation,
restatement, extended filing delay, and the SECs administrative proceeding, including
customer, partner, employee, and investor concern, and potential customer and partner
transaction deferrals or losses; |
|
|
|
risks relating to the remediation or inability to adequately remediate material
weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting and relating to the proper
application of highly complex accounting rules and pronouncements in order to produce
accurate SEC reports on a timely basis; |
|
|
|
risks relating to our implementation and maintenance of adequate systems and internal
controls for our current and future operations and reporting needs; |
|
|
|
risk of possible future restatements if the processes used to produce the financial
statements contained in this report or in future SEC reports are inadequate; |
|
|
|
risk associated with current or future regulatory actions or private litigations
relating to our internal investigation, restatement, or delays in filing required SEC
reports; |
|
|
|
risk that we will be unable to re-list our common stock on NASDAQ or another national
securities exchange and maintain such listing; |
|
|
|
risks associated with Comverse controlling our board of directors and a majority of our
common stock (and therefore the results of any significant stockholder vote); |
|
|
|
risks associated with significant leverage resulting from our current debt position; |
|
|
|
risks due to aggressive competition in all of our markets, including with respect to
maintaining margins and sufficient levels of investment in the business and with respect to
introducing quality products which achieve market acceptance; |
|
|
|
risks created by continued consolidation of competitors or introduction of large
competitors in our markets with greater resources than us;
|
iii
|
|
|
risks associated with significant foreign and international operations, including
exposure to fluctuations in exchange rates; |
|
|
|
risks associated with complex and changing local and foreign regulatory environments; |
|
|
|
risks associated with our ability to recruit and retain qualified personnel in all
geographies in which we operate; |
|
|
|
challenges in accurately forecasting revenue and expenses; |
|
|
|
risks associated with acquisitions and related system integrations; |
|
|
|
risks relating to our ability to improve our infrastructure to support growth; |
|
|
|
risks that our intellectual property rights may not be adequate to protect our business
or that others may make claims on our intellectual property or claim infringement on their
intellectual property rights; |
|
|
|
risks associated with a significant amount of our business coming from domestic and
foreign government customers; |
|
|
|
risk that we improperly handle sensitive or confidential information or perception of
such mishandling; |
|
|
|
risks associated with dependence on a limited number of suppliers for certain components
of our products; |
|
|
|
risk that we are unable to maintain and enhance relationships with key resellers,
partners, and systems integrators; and |
|
|
|
risk that use of our NOLs or other tax benefits may be restricted or eliminated in the
future. |
These risks and uncertainties, as well as other factors, are discussed in greater detail in Risk
Factors under Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2010.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect our
managements view only as of the filing date of this report. We make no commitment to revise or
update any forward-looking statements in order to reflect events or circumstances after the date
any such statement is made, except as otherwise required under the federal securities
laws. If we were in any particular instance to update or correct a forward-looking statement,
investors and others should not conclude that we would make additional updates or corrections
thereafter except as otherwise required under the federal securities laws.
iv
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
VERINT SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
April 30, 2010 and January 31, 2010
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
(in
thousands, except share and per share data) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
149,403 |
|
|
$ |
184,335 |
|
Restricted cash and bank time deposits |
|
|
4,972 |
|
|
|
5,206 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
140,649 |
|
|
|
127,826 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
14,654 |
|
|
|
14,373 |
|
Deferred cost of revenue |
|
|
8,576 |
|
|
|
11,232 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
59,997 |
|
|
|
64,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
378,251 |
|
|
|
407,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
23,396 |
|
|
|
24,453 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
730,053 |
|
|
|
724,670 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
171,541 |
|
|
|
173,833 |
|
Capitalized software development costs, net |
|
|
7,812 |
|
|
|
8,530 |
|
Deferred cost of revenue |
|
|
28,847 |
|
|
|
33,019 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
25,712 |
|
|
|
24,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,365,612 |
|
|
$ |
1,396,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities, Preferred Stock, and Stockholders Deficit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
44,464 |
|
|
$ |
46,570 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
171,197 |
|
|
|
155,422 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
22,098 |
|
|
|
22,678 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
165,696 |
|
|
|
183,719 |
|
Liabilities to affiliates |
|
|
1,793 |
|
|
|
1,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
405,248 |
|
|
|
410,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
598,234 |
|
|
|
598,234 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
47,991 |
|
|
|
51,412 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
62,778 |
|
|
|
65,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,114,251 |
|
|
|
1,125,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock $0.001 par value; authorized 2,500,000 shares.
Series A convertible preferred stock; 293,000 shares issued and
outstanding; aggregate liquidation preference and redemption value
of $328,983 at April 30, 2010 |
|
|
285,542 |
|
|
|
285,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Deficit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $0.001 par value; authorized 120,000,000 shares.
Issued 33,029,000 and 32,687,000 shares; outstanding
32,803,000 and 32,584,000 shares, as of April 30, 2010 and January
31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
458,665 |
|
|
|
451,166 |
|
Treasury
stock, at cost 226,000 and 103,000 shares
as of April 30, 2010 and January 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
(5,805 |
) |
|
|
(2,493 |
) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(436,546 |
) |
|
|
(420,338 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(51,314 |
) |
|
|
(43,134 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Verint Systems Inc. stockholders deficit |
|
|
(34,967 |
) |
|
|
(14,766 |
) |
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders deficit |
|
|
(34,181 |
) |
|
|
(14,567 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities, preferred stock, and stockholders deficit |
|
$ |
1,365,612 |
|
|
$ |
1,396,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
VERINT SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
Three Months Ended April 30, 2010 and 2009
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended April 30, |
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
$ |
92,070 |
|
|
$ |
97,071 |
|
Service and support |
|
|
80,543 |
|
|
|
78,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
172,613 |
|
|
|
175,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
|
28,346 |
|
|
|
32,057 |
|
Service and support |
|
|
27,228 |
|
|
|
22,913 |
|
Amortization of acquired technology and backlog |
|
|
2,233 |
|
|
|
2,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue |
|
|
57,807 |
|
|
|
57,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
114,806 |
|
|
|
118,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development, net |
|
|
26,432 |
|
|
|
18,901 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
87,017 |
|
|
|
57,226 |
|
Amortization of other acquired intangible assets |
|
|
5,339 |
|
|
|
5,930 |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
118,788 |
|
|
|
82,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(3,982 |
) |
|
|
36,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(5,948 |
) |
|
|
(6,353 |
) |
Other expense, net |
|
|
(3,698 |
) |
|
|
(4,963 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense, net |
|
|
(9,563 |
) |
|
|
(11,169 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
(13,545 |
) |
|
|
24,840 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
2,071 |
|
|
|
4,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(15,616 |
) |
|
|
20,572 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Verint Systems Inc. |
|
|
(16,208 |
) |
|
|
19,634 |
|
Dividends on preferred stock |
|
|
(3,403 |
) |
|
|
(3,262 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Verint Systems Inc. common shares |
|
$ |
(19,611 |
) |
|
$ |
16,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share attributable to Verint Systems Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.60 |
) |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.60 |
) |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
32,663 |
|
|
|
32,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
32,663 |
|
|
|
42,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
VERINT SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Deficit
Three Months Ended April 30, 2010 and 2009
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verint Systems Inc. Stockholders Deficit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Total Verint |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Systems Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Balances as of January 31, 2009 |
|
|
32,535 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
419,937 |
|
|
$ |
(2,353 |
) |
|
$ |
(435,955 |
) |
|
$ |
(58,404 |
) |
|
$ |
(76,743 |
) |
|
$ |
673 |
|
|
$ |
(76,070 |
) |
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,634 |
|
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
20,572 |
|
Unrealized gains on derivative
financial instruments, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
Unrealized gains on available for
sale securities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Currency translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,818 |
|
|
|
2,818 |
|
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
2,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,634 |
|
|
|
2,895 |
|
|
|
22,529 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
23,200 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,257 |
|
Common stock issued for stock awards |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeitures of restricted stock awards |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of April 30, 2009 |
|
|
32,552 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
426,216 |
|
|
$ |
(2,375 |
) |
|
$ |
(416,321 |
) |
|
$ |
(55,509 |
) |
|
$ |
(47,957 |
) |
|
$ |
1,344 |
|
|
$ |
(46,613 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of January 31, 2010 |
|
|
32,584 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
451,166 |
|
|
$ |
(2,493 |
) |
|
$ |
(420,338 |
) |
|
$ |
(43,134 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,766 |
) |
|
$ |
199 |
|
|
$ |
(14,567 |
) |
Comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,208 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,208 |
) |
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
(15,616 |
) |
Unrealized gains on derivative
financial instruments, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
Currency translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,261 |
) |
|
|
(8,261 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(8,266 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,208 |
) |
|
|
(8,180 |
) |
|
|
(24,388 |
) |
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
(23,801 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,546 |
|
Common stock issued for stock awards |
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,312 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,312 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,312 |
) |
Tax effects from stock award plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of April 30, 2010 |
|
|
32,803 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
458,665 |
|
|
$ |
(5,805 |
) |
|
$ |
(436,546 |
) |
|
$ |
(51,314 |
) |
|
$ |
(34,967 |
) |
|
$ |
786 |
|
|
$ |
(34,181 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
VERINT SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Three Months Ended April 30, 2010 and 2009
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended April 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(15,616 |
) |
|
$ |
20,572 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
11,898 |
|
|
|
13,073 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
7,546 |
|
|
|
6,257 |
|
Non-cash losses on derivative financial instruments, net |
|
|
1,703 |
|
|
|
3,539 |
|
Other non-cash items, net |
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
|
1,685 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of business combination: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(13,787 |
) |
|
|
(5,365 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(488 |
) |
|
|
938 |
|
Deferred cost of revenue |
|
|
6,161 |
|
|
|
7,041 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
14,959 |
|
|
|
(15,012 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(18,476 |
) |
|
|
3,255 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
1,501 |
|
|
|
(6,667 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(1,110 |
) |
|
|
(1,874 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
(4,520 |
) |
|
|
27,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for business combination, net of cash acquired, and payments of contingent
consideration associated with business combinations in prior periods |
|
|
(15,292 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(1,878 |
) |
|
|
(738 |
) |
Settlements of derivative financial instruments not designated as hedges |
|
|
(6,333 |
) |
|
|
(3,850 |
) |
Cash paid for capitalized software development costs |
|
|
(462 |
) |
|
|
(509 |
) |
Other investing activities |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(23,760 |
) |
|
|
(4,299 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of borrowings and other financing obligations |
|
|
(580 |
) |
|
|
(1,562 |
) |
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,142 |
) |
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
|
(3,312 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other financing activities |
|
|
(897 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(4,789 |
) |
|
|
(3,704 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(1,863 |
) |
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(34,932 |
) |
|
|
20,244 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
184,335 |
|
|
|
115,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
149,403 |
|
|
$ |
136,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
3,538 |
|
|
$ |
7,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
1,525 |
|
|
$ |
3,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued but unpaid purchases of property and equipment |
|
$ |
495 |
|
|
$ |
216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory transfers to property and equipment |
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
VERINT SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Preparation
The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and on the
same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form
10-K filed with the SEC for the year ended January 31, 2010. The condensed consolidated statements
of operations, stockholders deficit and cash flows for the periods ended April 30, 2010 and 2009,
and the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of April 30, 2010, are not audited but reflect all
adjustments that are of a normal recurring nature and that are considered necessary for a fair
presentation of the results of the periods shown. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of
January 31, 2010 is derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet presented in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2010. Certain information and disclosures
normally included in annual consolidated financial statements have been omitted pursuant to the
rules and regulations of the SEC. Because the condensed consolidated interim financial statements
do not include all of the information and disclosures required by GAAP for a complete set of
financial statements, they should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial
statements and notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the year
ended January 31, 2010. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of a full
years results.
Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms Verint, we, our, and us and words of
similar import as used in these notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements include
Verint Systems Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Verint Systems
Inc., our wholly owned subsidiaries, and a joint venture in which we hold a 50% equity interest.
This joint venture functions
as a systems integrator for Asian markets and is a variable interest entity in which we are the
primary beneficiary. Investments in companies in which we have less than a 20% ownership interest
and do not exercise significant influence are accounted for at cost. We include the results of
operations of acquired companies from the date of acquisition. All significant intercompany
transactions and balances are eliminated.
5
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires our management to make
estimates and assumptions, which may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Standards Implemented:
In May 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a new accounting standard
that establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the
balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued. In February 2010, the FASB issued
an amendment to this guidance that removed the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date
through which subsequent events have been evaluated in both issued and revised financial
statements. The adoption of this standard, as amended, did not have a material impact on our
condensed consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued a new accounting standard related to the consolidation of variable
interest entities, requiring a company to perform an analysis to determine whether its variable
interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. This analysis
requires a company to assess whether it has the power to direct the activities of the variable
interest entity and if it has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that
could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. This standard requires an
ongoing reassessment of whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity,
eliminates the quantitative approach previously required for determining the primary beneficiary of
a variable interest entity, and significantly enhances disclosures. The standard may be applied
retrospectively to previously issued financial statements with a cumulative-effect adjustment to
retained earnings as of the beginning of the first year restated. This standard is effective for
us for the fiscal year beginning on February 1, 2010. The adoption of this standard did not have a
material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued amended standards that require additional fair value disclosures.
These disclosure requirements are effective in two phases. The initial phase, effective for us as
of February 1, 2010, requires enhanced disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques used to
measure fair value as well as disclosures about significant transfers. The adoption of this
standard did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements. The
second phase, effective for us as of February 1, 2011, is further discussed below.
6
New Standards to be Implemented:
In October 2009, the FASB issued guidance that applies to multiple-deliverable revenue
arrangements. This guidance also provides principles and application guidance on whether a revenue
arrangement contains multiple deliverables, how the arrangement should be separated, and how the
arrangement consideration should be allocated. The guidance requires an entity to allocate revenue
in a multiple-deliverable arrangement using estimated selling prices of the deliverables if a
vendor does not have vendor specific objective evidence of fair value (VSOE) or third-party
evidence of selling price. It eliminates the use of the residual method and, instead, requires an
entity to allocate revenue using the relative selling price method. It also expands disclosure
requirements with respect to multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements.
Also in October 2009, the FASB issued guidance related to multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements
that contain both software and hardware elements, focusing on determining which revenue
arrangements are within the scope of
existing software revenue guidance. This additional guidance removes tangible products from the
scope of the software revenue guidance and provides guidance on determining whether software
deliverables in an arrangement that includes a tangible product are within the scope of the
software revenue guidance. The above guidance related to revenue recognition should be applied on
a prospective basis for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years
beginning on or after June 15, 2010. It will be effective for us in our fiscal year beginning
February 1, 2011, although early adoption is permitted. Alternatively, an entity can elect to
adopt the provisions of these issues on a retrospective basis. We are assessing the impact that
the application of this new guidance, and the guidance discussed in the preceding paragraph, may
have on our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued amended standards that require additional fair value disclosures.
These disclosure requirements are effective in two phases. The initial phase, as previously
discussed, was effective for us in our fiscal year beginning February 1, 2010. The second phase,
effective for us as of February 1, 2011, will require presentation of disaggregated activity within
the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). We
are assessing the impact that the application of this new guidance may have on our consolidated
financial statements.
7
2. Net Income (Loss) Per Share Attributable to Verint Systems Inc.
The following table summarizes the calculation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share
attributable to Verint Systems Inc. for the three months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended April 30, |
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(15,616 |
) |
|
$ |
20,572 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Verint Systems Inc. |
|
|
(16,208 |
) |
|
|
19,634 |
|
Dividends on preferred stock |
|
|
(3,403 |
) |
|
|
(3,262 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Verint Systems Inc. for
basic net income (loss) per share |
|
|
(19,611 |
) |
|
|
16,372 |
|
Dilutive effect of dividends on preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Verint Systems Inc. for
diluted net income (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(19,611 |
) |
|
$ |
19,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
32,663 |
|
|
|
32,459 |
|
Dilutive effect of employee equity award plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive effect of assumed conversion of preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
32,663 |
|
|
|
42,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share attributable to Verint Systems Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.60 |
) |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.60 |
) |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to the net loss applicable to Verint Systems Inc. common shares reported for the three months
ended April 30, 2010, the assumed exercise of stock options and assumed settlement of unvested
restricted stock awards and restricted stock units had an antidilutive effect and was therefore
excluded from the computation of weighted-average diluted shares outstanding for the period. The
options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units excluded from the computation of
weighted-average diluted shares outstanding totaled 8.7 million as of April 30, 2010.
Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding for the three months ended April 30, 2009 excludes
shares underlying approximately 4.7 million stock options, representing all of our outstanding
options during this period, since such options have exercise prices in excess of the average market
value of our common stock during the period and are therefore antidilutive.
Also excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share attributable to Verint Systems
Inc. for the three months ended April 30, 2010 were 10.1 million common shares issuable from the
assumed conversion of our preferred stock, because such assumed conversion would have an
antidilutive effect.
8
3. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following as of April 30, 2010 and January 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
7,126 |
|
|
$ |
5,987 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
3,987 |
|
|
|
4,649 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
3,541 |
|
|
|
3,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
$ |
14,654 |
|
|
$ |
14,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Business Combination
On February 4, 2010, our wholly owned subsidiary, Verint Americas Inc., acquired all of the
outstanding shares of Iontas Limited (Iontas), a privately held provider of desktop analytics
solutions. Prior to this acquisition, we licensed certain technology from Iontas, whose solutions
measure application usage and analyze workflows to help improve staff performance in contact
center, branch, and back-office operations environments. We acquired Iontas, among other
objectives, to expand the desktop analytical capabilities of our workforce optimization solutions.
We have included the financial results of Iontas in our condensed consolidated financial statements
since February 4, 2010.
We acquired Iontas for total consideration valued at $21.9 million, including cash consideration of
$17.9 million, and additional milestone-based contingent payments of up to $3.8 million, tied to
certain performance targets being achieved over the next two years.
We have recorded the acquisition-date estimated fair value of the contingent consideration of $3.2
million as a component of the purchase price of Iontas. The acquisition-date fair value of the
contingent consideration was measured based on the probability-adjusted present value of the
contingent consideration expected to be earned and transferred. The fair value of the contingent
consideration was remeasured as of April 30, 2010 at $3.3 million, and the change in the fair value
of the contingent consideration between the acquisition date and April 30, 2010 is recorded within
selling, general and administrative expenses in our condensed consolidated statements of
operations.
Our purchase price to acquire Iontas also includes $1.5 million of prepayments for product licenses
and support services procured from Iontas prior to the acquisition date, partially offset by $0.7
million of trade accounts payable to Iontas as of the acquisition date.
9
The following table sets forth the components and the preliminary allocation of the purchase price
of Iontas:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Useful
Lives |
|
Components of Purchase Price: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
17,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of contingent consideration |
|
|
3,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid product licenses and support services |
|
|
1,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
|
(712 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
21,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of Purchase Price: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net tangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
2,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes current and long-term |
|
|
(993 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net tangible assets |
|
|
1,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed technology |
|
|
6,949 |
|
|
6 years |
Non-competition agreements |
|
|
278 |
|
|
3 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total identifiable intangible assets (1) |
|
|
7,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
12,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
21,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The weighted-average amortization period of all finite-lived identifiable
intangible assets is 5.9 years. |
Among the factors that contributed to the recognition of goodwill in this transaction were the
expansion of our desktop analytical capabilities, the expansion of our suite of products and
services, and the addition of an assembled workforce. This goodwill has been assigned to our
Workforce Optimization segment, and is not deductible for income tax purposes.
Transaction costs, primarily professional fees, directly related to the acquisition of Iontas,
totaled $1.2 million, including $0.5 million incurred during the three months ended April 30, 2010,
and were expensed as incurred.
The pro forma impact of the Iontas acquisition is not material to our historical consolidated
operating results and is therefore not presented. Revenues from Iontas for the three months ended
April 30, 2010 were also not material.
10
5. Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Acquisition-related intangible assets consist of the following as of April 30, 2010 and January 31,
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
196,121 |
|
|
$ |
(59,128 |
) |
|
$ |
136,993 |
|
Acquired technology |
|
|
60,868 |
|
|
|
(30,456 |
) |
|
|
30,412 |
|
Trade names |
|
|
9,453 |
|
|
|
(8,201 |
) |
|
|
1,252 |
|
Non-competition agreements |
|
|
3,694 |
|
|
|
(2,325 |
) |
|
|
1,369 |
|
Distribution network |
|
|
2,440 |
|
|
|
(925 |
) |
|
|
1,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
272,576 |
|
|
$ |
(101,035 |
) |
|
$ |
171,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
198,084 |
|
|
$ |
(54,825 |
) |
|
$ |
143,259 |
|
Acquired technology |
|
|
54,629 |
|
|
|
(28,419 |
) |
|
|
26,210 |
|
Trade names |
|
|
9,551 |
|
|
|
(7,989 |
) |
|
|
1,562 |
|
Non-competition agreements |
|
|
3,429 |
|
|
|
(2,203 |
) |
|
|
1,226 |
|
Distribution network |
|
|
2,440 |
|
|
|
(864 |
) |
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
268,133 |
|
|
$ |
(94,300 |
) |
|
$ |
173,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortization expense recorded for acquisition-related intangible assets was $7.6 million and
$8.0 million for the three months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Estimated future finite-lived acquisition-related intangible asset amortization expense is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
Years Ended January 31, |
|
Amount |
|
2011 (Remainder of year) |
|
$ |
22,683 |
|
2012 |
|
|
29,325 |
|
2013 |
|
|
28,546 |
|
2014 |
|
|
23,558 |
|
2015 |
|
|
20,986 |
|
2016 and thereafter |
|
|
46,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
171,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
11
Goodwill activity for the three months ended April 30, 2010, in total and by reportable segment,
was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce |
|
|
Video |
|
|
Communications |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
Optimization |
|
|
Intelligence |
|
|
Intelligence |
|
Goodwill, gross, at January 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
791,535 |
|
|
$ |
694,465 |
|
|
$ |
66,998 |
|
|
$ |
30,072 |
|
Accumulated impairment losses through January 31, 2010 |
|
|
(66,865 |
) |
|
|
(30,791 |
) |
|
|
(36,074 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill, net, at January 31, 2010 |
|
|
724,670 |
|
|
|
663,674 |
|
|
|
30,924 |
|
|
|
30,072 |
|
Acquisition of Iontas Limited |
|
|
12,899 |
|
|
|
12,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
(7,516 |
) |
|
|
(6,850 |
) |
|
|
(666 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill, net, at April 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
730,053 |
|
|
$ |
669,723 |
|
|
$ |
30,258 |
|
|
$ |
30,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill, gross, at April 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
796,918 |
|
|
$ |
700,514 |
|
|
$ |
66,332 |
|
|
$ |
30,072 |
|
Accumulated impairment losses through April 30, 2010 |
|
|
(66,865 |
) |
|
|
(30,791 |
) |
|
|
(36,074 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill, net, at April 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
730,053 |
|
|
$ |
669,723 |
|
|
$ |
30,258 |
|
|
$ |
30,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We test our goodwill for impairment at least annually as of November 1, or more frequently if an
event occurs indicating the potential for impairment. No events or circumstances indicating the
potential for goodwill impairment were identified during either the three months ended April 30,
2010 or the three months ended April 30, 2009.
6. Long-term Debt
On May 25, 2007, to partially finance the acquisition of Witness Systems Inc. (Witness), we
entered into a $675.0 million secured credit facility comprised of a $650.0 million seven-year term
loan facility and a $25.0 million six-year revolving credit facility.
The following is a summary of our outstanding financing arrangements as of April 30, 2010 and
January 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Term loan facility |
|
$ |
605,332 |
|
|
$ |
605,912 |
|
Revolving credit facility |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
|
620,332 |
|
|
|
620,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: current portion |
|
|
22,098 |
|
|
|
22,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
598,234 |
|
|
$ |
598,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The interest rates on the term loan were 3.54% and 3.49% as of April 30, 2010 and January 31, 2010,
respectively.
12
Our $25.0 million revolving line of credit facility was reduced to $15.0 million during the quarter
ended October 31, 2008 as a result of the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers. During the quarter ended
January 31, 2009, we borrowed the full $15.0 million available under the revolving credit facility.
Repayment of these borrowings is required upon expiration of the facility in May 2013. The
interest rates on the revolving line of credit borrowings were 3.54% and 3.49% as of April 30, 2010
and January 31, 2010, respectively.
On May 25, 2007, concurrently with entry into our credit facility, we entered into a
receive-variable/pay-fixed interest rate swap agreement with a multinational financial institution
on a notional amount of $450.0 million to mitigate a portion of the risk associated with variable
interest rates on the term loan. This interest rate swap agreement terminates in May 2011. See
Note 11, Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Financial Instruments for further details
regarding the interest rate swap agreement.
During the three months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009, we incurred $5.4 million and $5.8 million of
interest expense, respectively, on borrowings under our credit facilities. We also recorded $0.5
million and $0.4 million during three month periods ended April 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively,
for amortization of our deferred debt issuance costs, which is reported within interest expense.
In May 2010, we made a $22.1 million mandatory excess cash flow prepayment of the term loan,
based upon our operating results for the year ended January 31, 2010, $12.4 million of which will
be applied to the eight immediately following principal payments and $9.7 million of which will be
applied pro rata to the remaining principal payments.
The credit agreement also includes a requirement that we submit audited consolidated financial
statements to the lenders within 90 days of the end of each fiscal year, beginning with the
financial statements for the year ended January 31, 2010. Should we fail to deliver such audited
consolidated financial statements as required, the agreement provides a thirty day period to cure
such default, or an event of default occurs.
On April 27, 2010, we entered into an amendment to our credit agreement to extend the due date for
delivery of audited consolidated financial statements and related documentation for the year ended
January 31, 2010 from May 1, 2010 to June 1, 2010. In consideration for this amendment, we paid
$0.9 million to our lenders. This payment will be amortized as additional interest expense over
the remaining term of the credit agreement using the effective interest method. Legal fees and
other out-of-pocket costs directly relating to the amendment, which were expensed as incurred, were
not significant.
13
7. Convertible Preferred Stock
On May 25, 2007, in connection with our acquisition of Witness, we entered into a Securities
Purchase Agreement with Comverse, whereby Comverse purchased, for cash, an aggregate of 293,000
shares of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, for an aggregate purchase price of $293.0
million. Proceeds from the issuance of the preferred stock were used to partially finance the
acquisition.
The terms of the preferred stock provide that upon a fundamental change, as defined, the holders of
the preferred stock would have the right to require us to repurchase the preferred stock for 100%
of the liquidation preference then in effect. Therefore, the preferred stock has been classified
as mezzanine equity on our condensed consolidated balance sheets as of April 30, 2010 and January
31, 2010, separate from permanent equity, because the occurrence of these fundamental changes, and
thus potential redemption of the preferred stock, however remote in likelihood, is not solely under
our control. Fundamental change events include the sale of substantially all of our assets and
certain changes in beneficial ownership, board of directors representation, and business
reorganizations.
We concluded that, as of April 30, 2010 and January 31, 2010, there were no indications that the
occurrence of a fundamental change and the associated redemption of the preferred stock were
probable. We therefore have not adjusted the initial carrying amount of the preferred stock to its
redemption amount, which is its liquidation preference. Through April 30, 2010, cumulative,
undeclared dividends on the preferred stock were $36.0 million and as a result, the liquidation
preference of the preferred stock was $329.0 million at that date. If it were convertible at April
30, 2010, the preferred stock could be converted into approximately 10.1 million shares of our
common stock.
8. Stockholders Deficit
Treasury Stock
From time to time, our board of directors approves repurchases of our common stock from executive
officers upon vesting of restricted stock grants during our extended filing delay period, in order
to provide funds to the recipient for the payment of associated income taxes.
During the three months ended April 30, 2010, we acquired 123,000 shares of treasury stock from
certain executive officers at a cost of $3.3 million. Treasury stock activity for the three months
ended April 30, 2009 was not significant.
14
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The following table summarizes, as of each balance sheet date, the components of our accumulated
other comprehensive loss. Income tax effects on unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale
marketable securities and derivative financial instruments were not significant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Foreign currency translation losses, net |
|
$ |
(51,506 |
) |
|
$ |
(43,245 |
) |
Unrealized gains on derivative financial instruments |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale marketable securities |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(51,314 |
) |
|
$ |
(43,134 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation losses, net, primarily reflect the strengthening of the U.S. dollar
against the British pound sterling since our acquisition of Witness in May 2007, which has resulted
in lower U.S. dollar translated balances of British pound sterling denominated goodwill and
intangible assets associated with the acquisition of Witness.
9. Restructuring
We continually review our business model and carefully manage our cost structure. When considered
necessary, we have periodically implemented restructuring plans to reduce costs and better align
our resources with market demand. Activities under all historical restructuring plans were
complete at January 31, 2010, with the exception of the restructuring plan related to the May 2007
acquisition of Witness.
Following the acquisition of Witness in May 2007, we implemented a plan to integrate the Witness
business with our existing Workforce Optimization segment, which included actions to reduce fixed
costs and eliminate redundancies. The following table summarizes the activity during the three
months ended April 30, 2010 in accrued expenses related to the Witness restructuring plan.
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
Accrued restructuring costs January 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
116 |
|
Payments and settlements |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accrued restructuring costs April 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
10. Income Taxes
Our quarterly provision for (benefit from) income taxes is measured using an estimated annual
effective tax rate for the period, adjusted for discrete items that occurred within the periods
presented. For the three months ended April 30, 2010, we recorded an income tax provision for
continuing operations of $2.1 million, which represents an effective tax rate of (15.3%). The
effective tax rate is negative due to the fact that we reported income tax expense on a
consolidated pre-tax loss. We did not record either a significant federal income tax expense or
income tax benefit because we maintain a valuation allowance against our U.S. deferred tax assets,
but recorded an income tax provision on income from certain foreign subsidiaries taxed at rates
lower than the U.S. federal statutory rate. The comparison of our effective tax rate between
periods is significantly impacted by the level and mix of earnings and losses by taxing
jurisdiction, foreign income tax rate differentials, relative impact of permanent book to tax
differences, and the effects of valuation allowances.
For the three months ended April 30, 2009, we recorded an income tax provision for continuing
operations of $4.3 million, which represents an effective tax rate of 17.2%. The tax rate for the
three months ended April 30, 2009 is lower than the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% primarily
because we maintain valuation allowances against our U.S. deferred tax assets and therefore did not
record significant income tax expense or income tax benefit in the U.S., but recorded an income tax
provision on income from our foreign subsidiaries taxed at rates lower than the U.S. federal
statutory rate.
As required by the authoritative guidance on accounting for income taxes, we evaluate the
realizability of deferred tax assets on a jurisdictional basis at each reporting date. Accounting
for income taxes requires that a valuation allowance be established when it is more likely than not
that all or a portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In circumstances where
there is sufficient negative evidence indicating that the deferred tax assets are not
more-likely-than-not realizable, we establish a valuation allowance. We determined there is
sufficient negative evidence to maintain the valuation allowances against our federal and certain
state and foreign deferred tax assets as
a result of historical losses in the most recent three-year period in the U.S. and certain foreign
jurisdictions. We intend to maintain a valuation allowance against these assets until sufficient
positive evidence exists to support its reversal.
16
We had unrecognized tax benefits of $38.3 million and $37.5 million (excluding interest and
penalties) as of April 30, 2010 and January 31, 2010, respectively. The accrued liability for
interest and penalties was $7.4 million and $7.2 million at April 30, 2010 and January 31, 2010,
respectively. Interest and penalties are recorded as a component of the provision for income taxes
in the statement of operations. As of April 30, 2010 and January 31, 2010 the total amount of
unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate was
approximately $33.3 million and $32.6 million, respectively. We regularly assess the adequacy of
our provisions for income tax contingencies in accordance with the applicable authoritative
guidance on accounting for income taxes. As a result, we may adjust the reserves for unrecognized
tax benefits for the impact of new facts and developments, such as changes to interpretations of
relevant tax law, assessments from taxing authorities, settlements with taxing authorities, and
lapses of statutes of expiration. We believe that it is reasonably possible that the total amount
of unrecognized tax benefits at April 30, 2010 could decrease by approximately $2 million in the
next twelve months as a result of settlement of certain tax audits or lapses of statutes of
limitation. Such decreases may involve the payment of additional taxes, the adjustment of certain
deferred taxes including the need for additional valuation allowances, and the recognition of tax
benefits. Our income tax returns are subject to ongoing tax examinations in several jurisdictions
in which we operate. We also believe that it is reasonably possible that new issues may be raised
by tax authorities or developments in tax audits may occur which would require increases or
decreases to the balance of reserves for unrecognized tax benefits; however, an estimate of such
changes cannot reasonably be made.
11. Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Financial Instruments
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer
a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When
determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required to be recorded at fair
value, we consider the principal or most advantageous market in which we would transact and
consider assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such
as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of nonperformance.
Accounting guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use
of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. An
instruments categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input
that is significant to the fair value measurement. This fair value hierarchy consists of three
levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1: quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2: inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as
quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical
or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are
observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of
the assets or liabilities; or
Level 3: unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity.
Assets and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the
fair value measurements. We review the fair value hierarchy classification of our applicable
assets and liabilities on a quarterly basis. Changes in the observability of valuation inputs may
result in transfers within the fair value measurement hierarchy. We did not identify any transfers
between levels of the fair value measurement hierarchy during the three months ended April 30,
2010.
17
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis consisted of the following
as of April 30, 2010 and January 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Fair Value Hierarchy Category |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds |
|
$ |
50,095 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
50,095 |
|
|
$ |
277 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreement |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,840 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Contingent
consideration business combination |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,840 |
|
|
$ |
3,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Fair Value Hierarchy Category |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds |
|
$ |
82,593 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
82,593 |
|
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
636 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest rate swap agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
30,448 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the change in the estimated fair value for our liability for
contingent consideration measured using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the
three-month period ended April 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
Fair value measurement at January 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
|
|
Contingent consideration liability recorded for business
combination |
|
|
3,224 |
|
Change in fair value recorded in operating expenses |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value measurement at April 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
3,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
18
Our liability for contingent consideration relates to the February 4, 2010 acquisition of Iontas.
Between February 4, 2010 and April 30, 2010, there were no changes in the estimated fair value of
the contingent consideration liability other than accretion related solely to the passage of time.
The $40 thousand change in fair value for the three months ended April 30, 2010 is recorded in the
condensed consolidated statement of operations within selling, general and administrative expenses.
Fair Value Measurements
Money Market Funds We value our money market funds using quoted market prices for such funds.
Foreign Currency Forward Contracts The estimated fair value of foreign currency forward contracts
is based on quotes received from the counterparty. These quotes are reviewed for reasonableness by
discounting the future estimated cash flows under the contracts, considering the terms and
maturities of the contracts and market exchange rates using readily observable market prices for
similar contracts.
Interest Rate Swap Agreement The fair value of our interest rate swap agreement is based in part
on data received from a third party financial institution. These fair values represent the
estimated amount we would receive or pay to settle the swap agreement, taking into consideration
current and projected interest rates using readily observable market prices for similar contracts
as well as the creditworthiness of the parties.
Contingent Consideration Business Combination The fair value of the contingent consideration
related to our acquisition of Iontas is estimated using a probability-adjusted discounted cash flow
model. This fair value measurement is based on significant inputs not observable in the market.
The key assumptions used in this model are the discount rate and the probability assigned to the
milestone being achieved. We remeasure the fair value of the contingent consideration at each
reporting period, and any changes in fair value resulting from either the passage of time or events
occurring after the acquisition date, such as changes in the probability of achieving the
performance target, are recorded in earnings.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Interest Rate Swap Agreement
The interest rates applicable to borrowings under our credit facilities are variable, and we are
exposed to risk from changes in the underlying index interest rates, which affect our cost of
borrowing. To partially mitigate this risk, and in part because we were required to do so by the
lenders, when we entered into our credit facilities in May 2007, we executed a pay-fixed,
receive-variable interest rate swap with a high credit-quality multinational financial institution
under which we pay fixed interest at 5.18% and receive variable interest of the three-month London
Interbank Offering Rate (LIBOR) on a notional amount of $450.0 million. This instrument is
settled with the counterparty on a quarterly basis, and matures on May 1, 2011. As of April 30,
2010, of the $620.3 million of borrowings which were outstanding under the term loan facility, the
interest rate on $450.0 million of such borrowings was substantially fixed by
utilization of this interest rate swap. Interest on the remaining $170.3 million of borrowings was
variable.
19
The interest rate swap is not designated as a hedging instrument under derivative accounting
guidance, and gains and losses from changes in its fair value are therefore reported in other
income (expense), net.
Foreign Currency Forward Contracts
Under our risk management strategy, we periodically use derivative instruments to manage our
short-term exposures to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We utilize foreign
currency forward contracts to hedge certain operational cash flow exposures resulting from changes
in foreign currency exchange rates. These cash flow exposures result from portions of our
forecasted operating expenses, primarily compensation and related expenses, which are transacted in
currencies other than the U.S. dollar, primarily the Israeli shekel and the Canadian dollar. Our
joint venture, which has a Singapore dollar functional currency, also utilizes foreign currency
forward contracts to manage its exposure to exchange rate fluctuations related to settlement of
liabilities denominated in U.S. dollars. These foreign currency forward contracts are reported at
fair value on our consolidated balance sheets and have maturities of no longer than twelve months.
We enter into these foreign currency forward contracts in the normal course of business to mitigate
risks and not for speculative purposes.
The counterparties to our derivative financial instruments consist of several major international
financial institutions. We regularly monitor the financial strength of these institutions. While
the counterparties to these contracts expose us to credit-related losses in the event of a
counterpartys non-performance, the risk would be limited to the unrealized gains on such affected
contracts. We do not anticipate any such losses.
Certain of these foreign currency forward contracts are not designated as hedging instruments under
derivative accounting guidance, and gains and losses from changes in their fair values are
therefore reported in other income (expense), net. Changes in the fair value of foreign currency
forward contracts that are designated and effective as cash flow hedges are recorded net of related
tax effects in accumulated other comprehensive loss, and are reclassified to the statement
of operations when the effects of the item being hedged are recognized in the statement of
operations.
The total notional amounts for outstanding derivatives as of April 30, 2010 and January 31, 2010
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
50,085 |
|
|
$ |
50,437 |
|
Interest rate swap agreement |
|
|
450,000 |
|
|
|
450,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
500,085 |
|
|
$ |
500,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
Fair Values of Derivative Financial Instruments
The fair values of our derivative financial instruments as of April 30, 2010 and January 31, 2010
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Classification |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Classification |
|
Fair Value |
|
Derivative financial instruments designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
216 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative financial instruments designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
216 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments not designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest rate swap current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
21,204 |
|
Interest rate swap long-term portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
4,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative financial instruments not designated as hedging
instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Classification |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Classification |
|
Fair Value |
|
Derivative financial instruments designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities |
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative financial instruments designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments not designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities |
|
$ |
598 |
|
Interest rate swap current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
20,988 |
|
Interest rate swap long-term portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
8,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative financial instruments not designated as hedging
instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
The effects of derivative financial instruments in cash flow hedging relationships as of April 30,
2010 and January 31, 2010, and for the three months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classification of Gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains Recognized in |
|
|
Loss into the |
|
|
Gains Reclassified from Other |
|
|
|
Accumulated Other |
|
|
Condensed Statements |
|
|
Comprehensive Loss into
the Condensed |
|
|
|
Comprehensive Loss |
|
|
of Operations |
|
|
Statements of Operations |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended April 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
187 |
|
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
$ |
151 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no gains or losses from ineffectiveness of these financial instruments recorded for the
three month periods ended April 30, 2010 and 2009.
Gains (losses) recognized on derivative financial instruments not designated as hedging instruments
in our condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended April 30, 2010
and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classification in |
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed |
|
|
|
|
|
Statements of |
|
Three Months Ended April 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Operations |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Interest rate swap agreement |
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
$ |
(1,601 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,685 |
) |
Foreign currency forward
contracts |
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,703 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,539 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate
fair value due to their short maturities.
As of April 30, 2010, the estimated fair values of our outstanding term loan facility and revolving
credit facility were $583.4 million and $15.0 million, respectively. As of January 31, 2010, the
estimated fair values of our outstanding term loan and revolving credit borrowings were $572.6
million and $15.0 million, respectively. The estimated fair values of the term loan facility are
based upon the estimated bid and ask prices for portions of our term loan facility in a relatively
inactive market as determined by the agent responsible for the syndication of our term loan
facility. The fair value of the revolving credit facility is estimated to equal the principal
amount outstanding at April 30, 2010 and January 31, 2010.
22
Assets and Liabilities Not Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
In addition to assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, we also
measure certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Our non-financial
assets, including goodwill, intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, are measured at
fair value when there is an indication of impairment and the carrying amount exceeds the assets
projected undiscounted cash flows. These assets are recorded at fair value only when an impairment
charge is recognized.
12. Stock -Based Compensation
We recognized stock-based compensation expense in the following line items on the condensed
consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cost of revenue product |
|
$ |
631 |
|
|
$ |
118 |
|
Cost of revenue service and support |
|
|
1,778 |
|
|
|
799 |
|
Research and development, net |
|
|
3,485 |
|
|
|
1,075 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative |
|
|
12,076 |
|
|
|
4,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
17,970 |
|
|
$ |
6,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
stock-based compensation by classification was as follows for the three months
ended April 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Equity-classified awards |
|
$ |
7,546 |
|
|
$ |
6,257 |
|
Liability-classified awards |
|
|
10,424 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
17,970 |
|
|
$ |
6,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in stock-based compensation in the three-month period ended April 30, 2010, compared
to the prior-year period, reflects higher expenses for phantom stock awards resulting primarily
from an increase in the market price of our common stock. Phantom stock awards are accounted for
as liabilities and are settled with cash payments equivalent to the market value of our common
stock upon vesting. Their value tracks the market price of our common stock and is subject to
market volatility.
23
Stock Options
We have not granted stock options subsequent to January 31, 2006. However, in connection with our
acquisition of Witness on May 25, 2007, options to purchase Witness common stock were converted
into options to purchase approximately 3.1 million shares of our common stock.
Restricted Stock Awards and Restricted Stock Units
We periodically award shares of restricted stock, as well as restricted stock units, to our
directors, officers and other employees. These awards contain various vesting conditions, and are
subject to certain restrictions and forfeiture provisions prior to vesting.
During the three months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009, we granted 1.0 million and 1.3 million
combined restricted stock awards and restricted stock units, respectively. Restricted stock awards
and restricted stock units aggregating 0.1 million were forfeited during the three months ended
April 30, 2009, and forfeitures were not significant during the three months ended April 30, 2010.
As of April 30, 2010 and 2009, we had 4.1 million and 3.1 million of combined restricted stock
awards and stock units outstanding, respectively with weighted-average grant date fair values of
$25.30 and $4.90, respectively.
As of April 30, 2010, there was approximately $27.3 million of total unrecognized compensation
cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to unvested restricted stock awards and restricted
stock units, which is expected to be recognized over weighted-average periods of 0.5 years for
restricted stock awards and 0.7 years for restricted stock units.
Phantom Stock Units
We issue phantom stock units to certain non-officer employees that settle, or are expected to
settle, with cash payments upon vesting. Like equity-settled awards, phantom stock units are
awarded with vesting conditions and are subject to certain forfeiture provisions prior to vesting.
During the three months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009, we granted 0.2 million and 0.3 million
phantom stock units, respectively. Forfeitures in each period were not significant. Total cash
payments made upon vesting of phantom stock units were
$10.6 million and $2.2 million for the three
months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The total accrued liability for phantom stock
units was $13.9 million and $14.5 million as of April 30, 2010 and January 31, 2010, respectively.
13.
Legal Proceedings
Material legal proceedings which arose, or in which there were material developments, during the
quarter ended April 30, 2010 are discussed below.
On December 17, 2009, Comverse entered into agreements to settle the following lawsuits previously
disclosed by Comverse relating to the matters involved in the Comverse special committee
investigation which had been brought against Comverse and certain former officers and directors of
Comverse: (a) a consolidated shareholder class action before the U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of New York, In re Comverse Technology, Inc. Securities Litigation; (b) a
shareholder derivative action before the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York,
In re Comverse Technology, Inc. Derivative Litigation; and (c) a shareholder derivative action
before the New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, In re Comverse
Technology, Inc. Derivative Litigation.
24
On April 2, 2010, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York issued orders in the
shareholder class action and derivative action granting preliminary approval of the settlement
agreements in those actions. The court has scheduled a settlement hearing to be held on June 21,
2010 that will, among other things, consider orders and final judgments dismissing those actions
with prejudice.
Verint was not named as a defendant in any of these suits. Igal Nissim, our former Chief Financial
Officer, was named as a defendant in the federal and state shareholder derivative actions in his
capacity as the former Chief Financial Officer of Comverse, and Dan Bodner, our Chief Executive
Officer, was named as a defendant in the federal and state shareholder derivative actions in his
capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of Verint (i.e., as the president of a significant
subsidiary of Comverse). Mr. Nissim and Mr. Bodner were not named in the shareholder class action
suit.
The federal shareholder derivative suit alleged that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties
beginning in 1994 by: (a) allowing and participating in a scheme to backdate the grant dates of
employee stock options to improperly benefit Comverses executives and certain directors; (b)
allowing insiders, including certain of the defendants, to personally profit by trading Comverses
stock while in possession of material inside information; (c) failing to properly oversee or
implement procedures to detect and prevent such improper practices; (d) causing Comverse to issue
materially false and misleading proxy statements, as well as causing Comverse to file other false
and misleading documents with the SEC; and (e) exposing Comverse to civil liability. The
plaintiffs originally filed suit on April 20, 2006. The Consolidated, Amended, and Verified
Shareholder Derivative Complaint, filed on October 6, 2006, sought unspecified damages, injunctive
relief, including restricting the proceeds of the defendants trading activities and other assets,
setting aside the election of the defendant directors to the Comverse board of directors, and costs
and attorneys fees. On December 21, 2007, motions to dismiss the federal shareholder derivative
suit were fully briefed on behalf of Comverse as well as the individual defendants, including Mr.
Nissim and Mr. Bodner. No decision had been rendered on these motions to dismiss as of the signing
of the settlement agreements or as of the filing date of this report.
The state shareholder derivative suit made similar allegations to the federal shareholder
derivative suit. The plaintiffs first filed suit on April 11, 2006. The Consolidated and Amended
Shareholder Derivative Complaint, which was filed on September 18, 2006, sought unspecified
damages, injunctive relief, such as restricting the proceeds of the defendants trading activities
and other assets, and costs and attorneys fees.
The agreements in settlement of the above-mentioned actions are subject to notice to Comverses
shareholders and approval by the federal and state courts in which such proceedings are pending.
Neither we nor Mr. Nissim or Mr. Bodner is responsible for making any payments or relinquishing any
equity holdings under the terms of the settlement.
25
On July 20, 2006, we announced that, in connection with the SEC investigation into Comverses past
stock option grants that was in process at that time, we had received a letter requesting that we
voluntarily provide to the SEC certain documents and information related to our own stock option
grants and practices. We voluntarily responded to this request. On April 9, 2008, as we
previously reported, we received a Wells Notice from the staff of the SEC arising from the
staffs investigation of our past stock option grant practices and certain unrelated accounting
matters. These accounting matters were also the subject of our internal investigation. On March
3, 2010, the SEC filed a settled enforcement action against us in the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of New York relating to certain of our accounting reserve practices.
Without admitting or denying the allegations in the SECs Complaint, we consented to the
issuance of a Final Judgment permanently enjoining us from violating Section 17(a) of the
Securities Act, Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act, and Rules 13a-1
and 13a-13 thereunder. The settled SEC action did not require us to pay any monetary penalty and
sought no relief beyond the entry of a permanent injunction. The SECs related press release noted
that, in accepting the settlement offer, the SEC considered our remediation and cooperation in the
SECs investigation. The settlement was approved by the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of New York on March 9, 2010.
On December 23, 2009, as we previously reported, we received an additional Wells Notice from the
staff of the SEC relating to our failure to timely file periodic reports under the Exchange Act.
Under the SECs Wells process, recipients of a Wells Notice have the opportunity to make a Wells
Submission before the SEC staff makes a recommendation to the SEC regarding what action, if any,
should be brought by the SEC. After considering our Wells Submission, on March 3, 2010, the SEC
issued an Order Instituting Proceedings (OIP) pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Exchange Act to
suspend or revoke the registration of our common stock because of our previous failure to file an
annual report on either Form 10-K or Form 10-KSB since April 25, 2005 or quarterly reports on
either Form 10-Q or Form 10-QSB since December 12, 2005. On May 28, 2010, we entered into an
agreement in principle with the SECs Division of Enforcement regarding the terms of a settlement
of the SECs Section 12(j) proceeding. Under the agreement in principle, the Division of
Enforcement will recommend to the SEC that the Section 12(j) proceeding against us be dismissed if
we file our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2010 on a timely basis and file our Forms
10-Q for the quarters ended April 30, 2009, July 31, 2009, and October 31, 2009 by 5:30 p.m. EDT on
June 21, 2010. The agreement in principle is subject to approval by the SEC. As a result of the
agreement in principle, on June 1, 2010, a joint motion by the parties to stay the Section 12(j)
proceeding was granted by the administrative law judge hearing the case and a conference was
scheduled for July 2, 2010 to discuss the status of settlement. If the proceeding is not
dismissed, we intend to vigorously defend the matter.
26
On March 26, 2009, a motion to approve a class action lawsuit (the Labor Motion) and the class
action lawsuit itself (the Labor Class Action) (Labor Case No. 4186/09) were filed against our
subsidiary, Verint Systems Limited (VSL), by a former employee of VSL, Orit Deutsch, in the Tel
Aviv Labor Court. Ms. Deutsch purports to represent a class of our employees and ex-employees who
were granted options to buy shares of Verint and to whom allegedly, damages were caused as a result
of the blocking of the ability to exercise Verint options by our employees or ex-employees. The
Labor Motion and the Labor Class Action both claim that we are responsible for the alleged damages
due to our status as employer and that the blocking of Verint options from being exercised
constitutes default of the employment agreements between the members of the class and VSL. The
Labor Class Action seeks compensatory damages for the entire class in an unspecified amount. On
July 9, 2009, we filed a motion for summary dismissal and alternatively for the stay of the Labor
Motion. A preliminary session was held on July 12, 2009. Ms. Deutsch filed her response to our
response on November 10, 2009. On February 8, 2010, the Tel Aviv Labor Court dismissed the case
for lack of material jurisdiction and ruled that it will be transferred to the District Court in
Tel Aviv.
14. Segment Information
We conduct our business in three operating segments Enterprise Workforce Optimization Solutions
(Workforce Optimization), Video Intelligence Solutions (Video Intelligence), and Communications
Intelligence and Investigative Solutions (Communications Intelligence). These segments also
represent our reportable segments.
We measure the performance of our operating segments based upon operating segment revenue and
operating segment contribution. Operating segment contribution includes segment revenue and
expenses incurred directly by the segment, including material costs, service costs, research and
development and selling, marketing, and administrative expenses. We do not allocate certain
expenses, which include the majority of general and administrative expenses, facilities and
communication expenses, purchasing expenses, manufacturing support and logistic expenses,
depreciation and amortization, amortization of capitalized software development costs, stock-based
compensation, and special charges such as restructuring and integration expenses. These expenses
are included in the unallocated expenses section of the table presented below. Revenue from
transactions between our operating segments is not material.
With the exception of goodwill and acquired intangible assets, we do not identify or allocate our
assets by operating segment. Consequently, it is not practical to present assets by operating
segment. There were no material changes in the allocation of goodwill and acquired intangible
assets by operating segment during the three months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009.
27
Operating results by segment for the three months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended April 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce Optimization |
|
$ |
96,880 |
|
|
$ |
85,314 |
|
Video Intelligence |
|
|
31,545 |
|
|
|
41,678 |
|
Communications Intelligence |
|
|
44,188 |
|
|
|
48,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
172,613 |
|
|
$ |
175,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment contribution: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce Optimization |
|
$ |
45,974 |
|
|
$ |
40,264 |
|
Video Intelligence |
|
|
9,266 |
|
|
|
19,834 |
|
Communications Intelligence |
|
|
15,242 |
|
|
|
20,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment contribution |
|
|
70,482 |
|
|
|
80,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated expenses, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of other acquired intangible assets |
|
|
7,572 |
|
|
|
8,029 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
17,970 |
|
|
|
6,558 |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Other unallocated expenses |
|
|
48,922 |
|
|
|
30,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,464 |
|
|
|
44,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(3,982 |
) |
|
|
36,009 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
(9,563 |
) |
|
|
(11,169 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
(13,545 |
) |
|
$ |
24,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following managements discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations is designed to provide a better understanding of the significant factors related to our
results of operations and financial condition. The following information should be read in
conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2010 and our unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in this report. This discussion
contains a number of forward-looking statements, all of which are based on our current expectations
and all of which could be affected by uncertainties and risks. Our actual results may differ
materially from the results contemplated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many
factors including, but not limited to, those described under Cautionary Note on Forward Looking
Statements.
28
Business Overview
Verint is a global leader in Actionable Intelligence® solutions and value-added services. Our
solutions enable organizations of all sizes to make timely and effective decisions to improve
enterprise performance and make the world a safer place. More than 10,000 organizations in over
150 countries including over 80% of the Fortune 100 use Verint solutions to capture, distill,
and analyze complex and underused information sources, such as voice, video, and unstructured text.
In the enterprise market, our Workforce Optimization solutions help organizations enhance customer
service operations in contact centers, branches, and back-office environments to increase customer
satisfaction, reduce operating costs, identify revenue opportunities, and improve profitability.
In the security intelligence market, our video intelligence, public safety, and communications
intelligence and investigative solutions are vital to government and commercial organizations in
their efforts to protect people and property and neutralize terrorism and crime.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the consolidated financial statements in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2010 describes the significant
accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial
statements. The accounting policies that reflect our more significant estimates, judgments and
assumptions in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements are described in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 7
of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2010, and include the following:
|
|
|
revenue recognition; |
|
|
|
|
accounting for business combinations; |
|
|
|
|
impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets; |
|
|
|
|
accounting for income taxes; |
|
|
|
|
contingencies; |
|
|
|
|
accounting for stock-based compensation; and |
|
|
|
|
allowance for doubtful accounts. |
There were no material changes during the three months ended April 30, 2010 to our critical
accounting policies and estimates as disclosed in our Form 10-K for the year ended January 31,
2010.
29
Impact of Our VSOE/Revenue Recognition Policies on our Results of Operations
As we have previously reported in our filings with the SEC, we have not established VSOE for
certain elements of our arrangements, primarily our product offerings. We recognize revenue under
the Residual Method when VSOE does not exist for all delivered elements of an arrangement. Under
the Residual Method, the value of our delivered products is derived by ascertaining the fair value
of all undelivered elements (i.e., post-contract customer support (PCS) and other services) and
subtracting the fair value of the undelivered elements from the total arrangement value to
determine the appropriate amount of revenue to recognize upon delivery of our products. However, if
the fair value of all undelivered elements cannot be determined, revenue recognition is deferred
for all elements, including delivered elements, until all elements are delivered, except if the
only undelivered element is PCS. If VSOE for PCS does not exist the entire arrangement fee is
recognized ratably over the PCS period or the period that the customer is entitled to renew their
PCS but not to exceed the estimated economic life of the product or contractual period (Ratable
Method). In addition, several of our Communications Intelligence contracts require substantial
customization, and are therefore accounted for under contract accounting methods, using either the
percentage of completion method or completed contract method (Contract Accounting Method).
As we have previously reported in our filings with the SEC, we determined that for many of the
arrangements we entered into during previously reported periods (including periods included in this
report), we were unable to determine the fair value of all or some of the elements within
multiple-element arrangements, as required by accounting guidance for revenue recognition. Further,
for certain transactions occurring during periods reported herein, we were similarly unable to
determine the fair value of all or some of the elements. Therefore, certain arrangements are being
recognized ratably on a straight line basis over a period of time ranging from a couple of quarters
to several years while other transactions are recognized as delivery occurs based on the ability to
establish VSOE for the undelivered elements.
We believe that, in most cases, we have or will have changed our business processes and systems in
a way that will enable us to establish fair value for each undelivered element in our offerings.
These changes are intended to enable us to recognize revenue from products and services upon
delivery instead of recognizing the entire arrangement fee over the PCS period. As a result, we
expect the amount of revenue we will recognize in future periods that originated from transactions
occurring in prior periods will diminish over time. However, we believe that we will, in certain
situations, continue to enter into arrangements that will require revenue to be deferred over
longer periods of time.
30
Results of Operations
Financial Overview
The following table sets forth summary financial information for the three months ended April 30,
2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended April 30, |
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
172,613 |
|
|
$ |
175,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
(3,982 |
) |
|
$ |
36,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to
Verint Systems Inc. common shares |
|
$ |
(19,611 |
) |
|
$ |
16,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share
attributable to Verint Systems Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.60 |
) |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.60 |
) |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended April 30, 2010 compared to Three Months Ended April 30, 2009. Our revenue
decreased approximately 1%, or $2.5 million, to $172.6 million in the three months ended April 30,
2010 from $175.1 million in the three months ended April 30, 2009. The decrease was due to a
decrease in our Video Intelligence and Communication Intelligence segments, partially offset by an
increase in our Workforce Optimization. In our Video Intelligence segment, revenue decreased $10.2
million, or 24%, almost entirely due to the product delivery of an order from a major customer in
the three months ended April 30, 2009. In
our Communications Intelligence segment, revenue decreased $4.0 million, or 8%, primarily due to a
decrease in Contract Accounting Method revenue associated with work performed on certain large
projects partially offset by an increase in both Ratable Method revenue associated with support
revenue and Residual Method revenue associated with product delivery to customers. In our
Workforce Optimization segment, revenue increased by $11.6 million, or 14%, primarily due to
increased customer orders which we believe is attributable to the improving economic environment.
For more details on our revenue by segment, see - Revenue by Operating Segment. Revenue in the
Americas, Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA), and Asia Pacific Regions (APAC) represented
approximately 54%, 26%, and 20% of our total revenue, respectively, in the three months ended April
30, 2010 compared to approximately 54%, 24%, and 22%, respectively, in the three months ended April
30, 2009.
31
We had an operating loss of $4.0 million in the three months ended April 30, 2010 compared to
operating income of $36.0 million in the three months ended April 30, 2009. The decrease in
operating income was due to a decrease in gross profit of $3.3 million to $114.8 million from
$118.1 million which was almost entirely due to a decrease in revenue of $2.5 million as discussed
above coupled with an increase in operating expenses of $36.7 million. The increase in operating
expenses was primarily due to higher professional fees and related expenses associated with our
restatement of previously filed financial statements and our extended filing delay status which
totaled approximately $20.0 million in the three months ended April 30, 2010 compared to
approximately $7.0 million in the three months ended April 30, 2009, an increase in stock-based
compensation expense of $11.4 million primarily due to the impact of the increase in our stock
price on certain stock-based compensation arrangements accounted for as liability awards, as well
as the issuance of restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and stock-based compensation
arrangements granted at a higher market price during the three months ended April 30, 2010, and an
increase in employee compensation of $8.2 million primarily as a result of an increase in employee
headcount and the effect of the weakening of the U.S. dollar in the three months ended April 30,
2010 compared to the three months ended April 30, 2009 relative to the major foreign currencies
where we do business.
We had a net loss attributable to Verint Systems Inc. common shares of $19.6 million and a loss per
share of $0.60 in the three months ended April 30, 2010, compared to net income attributable to
Verint Systems Inc. common shares of $16.4 million and diluted income per share of $0.47 in the
three months ended April 30, 2009. The decrease in our net income attributable to Verint Systems
Inc. common shares and income per share in the three months ended April 30, 2010 was due to our
lower revenue and higher operating expenses as described above, partially offset by lower interest
and other expenses, net of $1.6 million and lower income tax expenses of $2.2 million.
The weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to the major foreign currencies where we do business
(primarily the British pound sterling, the euro, shekel, and Canadian dollar) in the three months
ended April 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended April 30, 2009 had a favorable impact on
our revenues and an unfavorable impact on our operating expenses. Had foreign exchange rates
remained constant in these periods, our total revenues would have been approximately $1.0 million
lower and our operating expenses and cost of goods sold would have been approximately $3.0 million
lower, or a net unfavorable impact of approximately $2.0 million on our operating income.
As of April 30, 2010, we employed approximately 2,600 personnel, including employees, part-time
employees and certain contractors, as compared to approximately 2,500 as of April 30, 2009.
Revenue by Operating Segment
The following table sets forth revenue for each of our three operating segments for the three
months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
% Change |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 2009 |
|
Workforce Optimization |
|
$ |
96,880 |
|
|
$ |
85,314 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Video Intelligence |
|
|
31,545 |
|
|
|
41,678 |
|
|
|
(24 |
%) |
Communications Intelligence |
|
|
44,188 |
|
|
|
48,156 |
|
|
|
(8 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
172,613 |
|
|
$ |
175,148 |
|
|
|
(1 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
Workforce Optimization Segment
Three Months Ended April 30, 2010 compared to Three Months Ended April 30, 2009. Workforce
Optimization revenue increased approximately 14%, or $11.6 million, to $96.9 million in the three
months ended April 30, 2010 from $85.3 million in the three months ended April 30, 2009. The
increase was primarily due to revenue associated with increased customer orders which we believe is
due to the improving economic environment.
Video Intelligence Segment
Three Months Ended April 30, 2010 compared to Three Months Ended April 30, 2009. Video
Intelligence revenue decreased approximately 24%, or $10.2 million, to $31.5 million in the three
months ended April 30, 2010 from $41.7 million in the three months ended April 30, 2009. The
decrease was almost entirely due to the product delivery of an order from a major customer in the
three months ended April 30, 2009.
Communications Intelligence Segment
Three Months Ended April 30, 2010 compared to Three Months Ended April 30, 2009. Communications
Intelligence revenue decreased approximately 8%, or $4.0 million, to $44.2 million in the three
months ended April 30, 2010 from $48.2 million in the three months ended April 30, 2009. This
decrease was primarily due to a decrease of approximately $12.0 million in Contract Accounting
Method revenue associated with work performed on customized projects partially offset by an
increase of approximately $2.0 million in Ratable Method revenue associated with increased support
revenue as well as an increase of approximately $6.0 million in Residual Method revenue associated
with the establishment of professional services VSOE
during the three months ended April 30, 2010, thereby allowing revenue recognition upon product
delivery rather than upon the completion of installation.
Volume and Price
We sell products in multiple configurations, and the price of any particular product varies
depending on the configuration of the product sold. Due to the variety of customized
configurations for each product we sell, we are unable to quantify the amount of any revenue
increases attributable to a change in the price of any particular product and/or a change in the
number of products sold.
Revenue by Product Revenue and Service and Support Revenue
We categorize and report our revenue in two categories product revenue and service and support
revenue. For multiple element arrangements for which we are unable to establish VSOE of one or
more delivered elements, we use various available indicators of fair value and apply our best
judgment to reasonably classify the arrangements delivered revenue into product revenue and
services and support revenue.
33
The following table sets forth revenue for products and services and support for the three months
ended April 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
% Change |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 2009 |
|
Product revenue |
|
$ |
92,070 |
|
|
$ |
97,071 |
|
|
|
(5 |
%) |
Service and support revenue |
|
|
80,543 |
|
|
|
78,077 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
172,613 |
|
|
$ |
175,148 |
|
|
|
(1 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Revenue
Three
Months Ended April 30, 2010 compared to Three Months Ended
April 30, 2009.
Product revenue decreased approximately 5%, or $5.0 million, to $92.1 million in the three months
ended April 30, 2010 from $97.1 million in the three months ended April 30, 2009. The decrease was
primarily in our Video Intelligence and Communication Intelligence segments, partially offset by an
increase in our Workforce Optimization segment. For additional
information see Revenue by
Operating Segment.
Service and Support Revenue
Three
Months Ended April 30, 2010 compared to Three Months Ended
April 30, 2009.
Service and support revenue increased approximately 3%, or $2.4 million, to $80.5 million for the
three months ended April 30, 2010 from $78.1 million in the three months ended April 30, 2009. The
increase was almost entirely in our Workforce Optimization segment due to higher support revenue as
well as higher professional services revenue associated with installation and
training, partially offset by decreases in our Video Intelligence and Communication Intelligence
segments. For additional information see Revenue by Operating Segment.
Cost of Revenue
The following table sets forth cost of revenue by products and services and support as well as
amortization and impairment of acquired technology and backlog for the three months ended April 30,
2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
% Change |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 2009 |
|
Product cost of revenue |
|
$ |
28,346 |
|
|
$ |
32,057 |
|
|
|
(12 |
%) |
Service and support cost of revenue |
|
|
27,228 |
|
|
|
22,913 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
Amortization of acquired technology
and backlog |
|
|
2,233 |
|
|
|
2,099 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue |
|
$ |
57,807 |
|
|
$ |
57,069 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
Product Cost of Revenue
Product cost of revenue primarily consists of hardware material costs and royalties due to third
parties for software components that are embedded in our software applications. When revenue is
deferred, we also defer hardware material costs and third-party software royalties and recognize
those costs over the same period that the product revenue is recognized. Product cost of revenue
also includes amortization of capitalized software development costs, employee compensation and
related expenses associated with our global operations, facility costs, and other allocated
overhead expenses. In our Communications Intelligence segment, product cost of revenue also
includes employee compensation and related expenses, contractor and consulting expenses, and travel
expenses, in each case relating to resources dedicated to the delivery of customized projects for
which certain contracts are accounted for under the Contract Accounting Method.
Three Months Ended April 30, 2010 compared to Three Months Ended April 30, 2009. Product cost of
revenue decreased approximately 12% to $28.3 million in the three months ended April 30, 2010 from
$32.1 million in the three months ended April 30, 2009 primarily in our Communications Intelligence
segment. Employee compensation and related expenses decreased $1.1 million and contractor expenses
decreased $1.4 million primarily as a result of less work performed on customized projects
accounted for under the Contract Accounting Method revenue in our Communications Intelligence
segment. For additional information see - Revenue by Operating Segment. In addition, material
costs decreased $1.5 million primarily in our Video Intelligence and Communication Intelligence
segments as a result of lower product costs. These decreases were partially offset by an increase
in stock-based compensation expense of $0.5 million primarily due to the impact of the increase in
our stock price on certain stock-based compensation arrangements accounted for as liability awards
as well as the issuance of restricted
stock awards, restricted stock units and stock-based compensation arrangements granted at a higher
market price during the three months ended April 30, 2010. Our overall product margins have
increased to 69% in the three months ended April 30, 2010 from 67% in the three months ended April
30, 2009 as a result of a higher portion of Workforce Optimization revenue in the overall product
mix, carrying a higher gross margin. Product margins in our Workforce Optimization segment
increased to 87% in the three months ended April 30, 2010 from 84% in the three months ended April
30, 2009 primarily due to an increase in revenue and an increase in the software portion of the
product mix carrying a higher gross margin. Product margins in our Communication Intelligence
segment increased to 67% in the three months ended April 30, 2010 from 60% in the three months
ended April 30, 2009 primarily due to a change in project mix. Product margins in our Video
Intelligence segment decreased to 58% in the three months ended April 30, 2010 from 65% in the
three months ended April 30, 2009 primarily due to a decrease in revenue, resulting in less of an
absorption of overhead costs, as well as a change in product mix. The above decreases include the
effect of the weakening of the U.S. dollar in the three months ended April 30, 2010 compared to the
three months ended April 30, 2009 relative to the major foreign currencies where we do business.
35
Service and Support Cost of Revenue
Service and support cost of revenue primarily consist of employee compensation and related
expenses, contractor costs, and travel expenses relating to installation, training, consulting, and
maintenance services. Service and support cost of revenue also include stock-based compensation
expenses, facility costs, and other overhead expenses.
Three Months Ended April 30, 2010 compared to Three Months Ended April 30, 2009.
Service and support cost of revenue increased approximately 19% to $27.2 million in the three
months ended April 30, 2010 from $22.9 million in the three months ended April 30, 2009. Employee
compensation and related expenses increased $1.6 million primarily in our Workforce Optimization
segment due to an increase in employee headcount. Contractor costs increased $1.4 million
primarily in our Communication Intelligence segment as a result of a change in project mix.
Stock-based compensation expense increased $1.0 million primarily due to the impact of the increase
in our stock price on certain stock-based compensation arrangements accounted for as liability
awards, as well as the issuance of restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and stock-based
compensation arrangements granted at a higher market price during the three months ended April 30,
2010. Our overall service and support margins decreased to 66% in the three months ended April 30,
2010 from 71% in the three months ended April 30, 2009 due to the increase in service and support
expenses discussed above. Contributing to the decline in service and support margins was the fact
that in certain cases expenses associated with service revenue recognized in the three months ended
April 30, 2010 and 2009 under the Ratable Method were recorded in prior periods when the costs were
incurred. In the three months ended April 30, 2010, we recognized a lower portion of our service
revenue under the Ratable Method thereby reducing service and support margins.
Amortization and Impairment of Acquired Technology and Backlog
Three Months Ended April 30, 2010 compared to Three Months Ended April 30, 2009. Amortization and
impairment of acquired technology and backlog increased approximately 6% to $2.2 million in the
three months ended April 30, 2010 from $2.1 million in the three months ended April 30, 2009
primarily due to an increase in acquired technology associated with the Iontas acquisition.
Research and Development, Net
Research and development expenses primarily consist of personnel and subcontracting expenses,
facility costs, and other allocated overhead, net of certain software development costs that are
capitalized as well as reimbursement under government programs. Software development costs are
capitalized upon the establishment of technological feasibility and until related products are
available for general release to customers.
36
The following table sets forth research and development, net expense for the three months ended
April 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
% Change |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 2009 |
|
Research and development, net |
|
$ |
26,432 |
|
|
$ |
18,901 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended April 30, 2010 compared to Three Months Ended April 30, 2009.
Research and development, net expense increased approximately 40% to $26.4 million in the three
months ended April 30, 2010 from $18.9 million in the three months ended April 30, 2009. Employee
compensation and related expenses increased $5.2 million primarily due to, in approximately equal
measure, higher expenses in our Communications Intelligence segment as a result of a higher
portion of employees time devoted to generic product development rather than specific
customization work for projects accounted for under the Contract Accounting Method, and an
increase in expenses in our Workforce Optimization segment resulting from an increase in employee
headcount. Employee stock-based compensation increased $2.4 million primarily due to the impact of
the increase in our stock price on certain stock-based compensation arrangements accounted for as
liability awards as well as the issuance of restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and
stock-based compensation arrangements granted at a higher market price during the three months
ended April 30, 2010. The above increases include the effect of the weakening of the U.S. dollar
in the three months ended April 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended April 30, 2009 relative
to the major foreign currencies where we do business.
Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general, and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel costs and related
expenses, professional fees, sales and marketing expenses, including travel, sales commissions and
sales referral fees, facility costs, communication expenses, and other administrative expenses.
The following table sets forth selling, general, and administrative expense for the three months
ended April 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
% Change |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 2009 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
87,017 |
|
|
$ |
57,226 |
|
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
Three Months Ended April 30, 2010 compared to Three Months Ended April 30, 2009.
Selling, general, and administrative expenses increased approximately 52% to $87.0 million in the
three months ended April 30, 2010 from $57.2 million in the three months ended April 30, 2009.
Professional fees increased $15.8 million primarily due to our restatement of previously filed
financial statements and our extended filing delay status totaling approximately $20.0 million in
the three months ended April 30, 2010 compared to approximately $7.0 million in the three months
ended April 30, 2009, as a result of our increased effort to complete our audit and file our
financial statements for the current and prior years. Employee compensation and related expenses
increased $2.6 million, due to an increase in headcount and the unfavorable foreign exchange impact
of the weakening U.S. dollar. Sales commissions increased $1.0 million due to an increase in
customer orders received during the quarter. Stock-based compensation increased $7.5 million
primarily due to the impact of the increase in our stock price on certain stock-based compensation
arrangements accounted for as liability awards, as well as the issuance of restricted stock awards,
restricted stock units and stock-based compensation arrangements granted at a higher market price
during the three months ended April 30, 2010. Marketing expenses increased $0.9 million due our
global brand awareness marketing campaign. Other expense increases include increases in travel and
entertainment expenses of $0.8 million, and other expenses totaling $1.2 million. The above
increases include the effect of the weakening of the U.S. dollar in the three months ended April
30, 2010 compared to the three months ended April 30, 2009 relative to the major foreign currencies
where we do business.
Amortization of Other Acquired Intangible Assets
The following table sets forth amortization of acquisition related intangibles for the three months
ended April 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
% Change |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 2009 |
|
Amortization of other
acquired intangible
assets |
|
$ |
5,339 |
|
|
$ |
5,930 |
|
|
|
(10 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended April 30, 2010 compared to Three Months Ended April 30, 2009. Amortization of
other acquired intangible assets decreased approximately 10% to $5.3 million in the three months
ended April 30, 2010 from $5.9 million in the three months ended April 30,
2009 primarily as a result of certain intangible assets becoming fully amortized during the year
ended January 31, 2010.
38
Other Income (Expense), Net
The following table sets forth total other income (expense), net for the three months ended April
30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
% Change |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 2009 |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
83 |
|
|
$ |
147 |
|
|
|
(44 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(5,948 |
) |
|
|
(6,353 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency losses |
|
|
(1,734 |
) |
|
|
(938 |
) |
|
|
85 |
% |
Losses on derivatives |
|
|
(1,703 |
) |
|
|
(3,539 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
%) |
Other, net |
|
|
(261 |
) |
|
|
(486 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense |
|
|
(3,698 |
) |
|
|
(4,963 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense, net |
|
$ |
(9,563 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,169 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended April 30, 2010 compared to Three Months Ended April 30, 2009.
Total other income (expense), net, decreased $1.6 million to an expense of $9.6 million in the
three months ended April 30, 2010, compared to an expense of $11.2 million in the three months
ended April 30, 2009. Interest expense decreased to $5.9 million in the three months ended April
30, 2010 from $6.4 million in the three months ended April 30, 2009 due to a decrease in our
average variable interest debt balance period to period, coupled with lower interest rates during
the three months ended April 30, 2010. We recorded a $1.7 million loss on foreign currency in the
three months ended April 30, 2010 compared to a $0.9 million loss in the prior year quarter. The
increase in foreign currency losses in the three months ended April 30, 2010 primarily resulted
from the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro during the three months ended April 30,
2010.
In the three months ended April 30, 2010, we recorded a net loss on derivatives of $1.7 million.
This loss was almost entirely attributable to a loss in connection with a $450.0 million interest
rate swap contract entered into concurrently with our credit agreement. This interest rate swap is
not designated as a hedging instrument under derivative accounting guidance, and accordingly, gains
and losses from changes in the fair value are recorded in other income (expense), net. In the
three months ended April 30, 2009, we recorded a net loss on derivatives of $3.5 million primarily
attributable to a loss on our interest rate swap.
39
Income Tax Provision
The following table sets forth our income tax provision for the three months ended April 30, 2010
and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
% Change |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 2009 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
2,071 |
|
|
$ |
4,268 |
|
|
|
(51 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our effective tax rate was (15.3%) for the three months ended April 30, 2010, as compared to 17.2%
for the three months ended April 30, 2009. The comparison of our effective tax rate between
periods is significantly impacted by the level and mix of earnings and losses by taxing
jurisdiction, foreign income tax rate differentials, relative impact of permanent book to tax
differences, and the effects of valuation allowances. In both periods, we did not record either a
significant federal income tax expense or income tax benefit because we maintain a valuation
allowance against our U.S. deferred tax assets, but recorded an income tax provision on income from
our foreign subsidiaries taxed at rates lower than the U.S. federal statutory rate. For the three
months ended April 30, 2010, our overall effective tax rate was negative due to the fact that we
reported income tax expense on a consolidated pre-tax loss.
Backlog
The delivery cycles of most of our products are generally very short, ranging from days to several
months, with the exception of certain projects with multiple deliverables over a longer period of
time. Therefore, we do not view backlog as a meaningful indicator of future business activity and
do not consider it a meaningful financial metric for evaluating our business.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
Our primary sources of cash have historically been collections of our accounts receivable for
services and products as well as cash advances from our customers, and may in the future include
cash raised from equity and/or debt financings. Our primary uses of cash have been for selling and
marketing activities, research and development, interest expense and related interest rate swap
settlements, professional fees and related expenses associated with our restatement of previously
filed financial statements and our extended filing delay status, capital expenditures and
acquisitions of businesses.
40
The following table sets forth, as of April 30, 2010 and January 31, 2010, cash and cash
equivalents, preferred stock and long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
149,403 |
|
|
$ |
184,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock (at carrying value) |
|
$ |
285,542 |
|
|
$ |
285,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
598,234 |
|
|
$ |
598,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At April 30, 2010, our cash and cash equivalents were $149.4 million, a decrease of $34.9 million
from January 31, 2010.
Statements of Cash Flows
The following table summarizes selected items from our condensed consolidated statements of cash
flows for the quarters ended April 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended April 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
$ |
(4,520 |
) |
|
$ |
27,442 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(23,760 |
) |
|
|
(4,299 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(4,789 |
) |
|
|
(3,704 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents |
|
|
(1,863 |
) |
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(34,932 |
) |
|
$ |
20,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
During the three months ended April 30, 2010, we used $4.5 million in cash in our operating
activities. This $4.5 million of cash used in operating activities reflects our net loss of $15.6
million, higher accounts receivable of $13.8 million, and $18.5 million of lower deferred revenue.
These uses of cash were partially offset by non-cash items of $22.3 million, primarily depreciation
and amortization and stock-based compensation, $15.0 million of higher accounts payable and accrued
expenses, and $6.2 million of lower deferred cost of revenue.
The primary reasons for our use of $4.5 million of cash in operating activities during the three
months ended April 30, 2010, compared to $27.4 million of cash provided by operating activities
during the three months ended April 30, 2009, were significantly higher payments during the
current-year period for professional fees and related expenses associated with our restatement of
previously filed financial statements and our extended filing delay status, lower collections of
accounts receivable, and higher payments for cash settlements upon vesting of stock-based
awards. Partially offsetting those uses of cash were higher accrued expenses and other
liabilities, including higher accrued compensation and higher billings in excess of costs and
estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts.
41
During the three months ended April 30, 2009, we generated $27.4 million of cash from operating
activities. This $27.4 million in cash from operating activities was due to net income of $20.6
million and non-cash items of $24.6 million, primarily depreciation and amortization and
stock-based compensation, and lower deferred cost of revenue of $7.0. These increases were
partially offset by lower accounts payable and accrued expenses of $15.0 million, higher accounts
receivable of $5.4 million, and higher prepaid expenses and other assets of $6.7 million.
Net cash used by investing activities
During the three months ended April 30, 2010, we used $23.8 million in cash in investing
activities, primarily reflecting $15.3 million of net cash utilized to acquire Iontas, and
settlements of derivative financial instruments not designated as hedges of $6.3 million.
During the three months ended April 30, 2009, we used $4.3 million in cash primarily to settle
derivative financial instruments not designated as hedges of $3.9 million.
Net cash used in financing activities
During the three months ended April 30, 2010, we used $4.8 million in cash in financing activities,
primarily reflecting $3.3 million of treasury stock purchases.
During the three months ended April 30, 2009, we used $3.7 million in cash, reflecting $2.1 million
of dividends paid to the noncontrolling stockholders of our joint venture and $1.6 million in
repayments of financing arrangements.
Liquidity and Capital Resources Requirements
Based on past performance and current expectations, we believe that our cash and cash equivalents
and cash generated from operations will be sufficient to meet anticipated operating costs, required
payments of principal and interest, working capital needs, capital expenditures, research and
development spending, and other commitments for at least the next 12 months. Currently, we have no
plans to pay any dividends on our preferred or common stock, which are not permitted under our
credit agreement.
Our liquidity could be negatively impacted by a decrease in demand for our products and service and
support, including the impact of changes in customer buying behavior due to the general global
economic downturn. We have incurred significant professional fees and related expenses in
connection with our restatement of previously filed financial statements and our extended filing
delay status, and we expect that we will continue to incur significant professional fees and costs
through the first half of 2010 and some related expenses remaining in the second half of the year.
Our liquidity could be negatively impacted by these additional fees and costs. In the event we
determine to make acquisitions, or otherwise require additional funds we may need to raise
additional capital, which could involve the issuance of equity or debt securities. There can be no
assurance that we would be able to raise additional equity or debt in the private or public markets
on terms favorable to us, or at all.
42
On May 25, 2007, we entered into a $650.0 million term loan and a $25.0 million revolving credit
facility with a group of banks to fund a portion of the acquisition of Witness. As of April 30,
2010, our outstanding term loan balance was $605.3 million. In May 2010, we paid down $22.1
million of the term loan leaving a balance of $583.2 million. The original $25.0 million revolving
credit facility was reduced to $15.0 million in September 2008 due to the bankruptcy of Lehman
Brothers and the termination of its commitment under the credit agreement. We borrowed the entire
$15.0 million available to us in November 2008 and currently have no remaining balance available to
us. The term loan matures on May 25, 2014 and the revolving credit facility matures on May 25,
2013.
The credit agreement requires mandatory prepayments from the proceeds of certain asset sales,
excess cash flow as defined by the agreement (for the year ended January 31, 2010, we made a $22.1
million prepayment in May 2010 as required by the annual excess cash flow requirement), proceeds
of indebtedness, and quarterly principal repayments (we made a $0.6 million required quarterly
principal repayment in February 2010). Any re-borrowings under the revolving credit facility are
dependent upon certain conditions including the absence of any material adverse effect or change on
our business, as defined in the credit agreement.
The credit agreement contains one financial covenant that requires us to meet a certain
consolidated leverage ratio, defined as our consolidated net total debt divided by consolidated
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) for the trailing four
quarters. EBITDA is defined in our credit agreement as net income/(loss) plus income tax expense,
interest expense, depreciation and amortization, losses related to hedge agreements, any
extraordinary, unusual, or non-recurring expenses or losses, any other non-cash charges, and
expenses incurred or taken prior to April 30, 2008 in connection with our acquisition of Witness,
minus interest income, any extraordinary, unusual, or non-recurring income or gains, gains related
to hedge agreements, and any other non-cash income. Under the credit agreement, the consolidated
leverage ratio could not exceed 3.50:1 for the quarterly periods ended January 31 and April 30,
2010, and the quarterly periods ending July 31 and October 31, 2010. As of January 31, 2010 and
April 30, 2010, we were in compliance with such requirement. For the quarterly periods ending
January 31, April 30, July 31, and October 31, 2011, the consolidated leverage ratio cannot exceed
2.50:1. For the quarterly period ending January 31, 2012 and thereafter, the consolidated leverage
ratio cannot exceed 2.00:1.
Based on current debt levels and our expectations for EBITDA, we may reduce our outstanding debt by
the end of the year ending January 31, 2011 in order to maintain compliance with the consolidated
leverage ratio covenant using available cash or we may attempt to raise cash from equity or debt
financings. Alternatively, we may attempt to modify the credit agreement terms or refinance the
bank debt. There can be no assurance that we will be successful with any such financing
activities.
In addition, we are subject to a number of restrictive covenants, including limitations on our
ability to incur indebtedness, create liens, make fundamental business changes, dispose of
property, make restricted payments including dividends, make significant investments, enter into
sale and leasebacks, enter new lines of business, provide negative pledges, enter into transactions
with related parties and enter into any speculative hedges although there are limited exceptions to
these covenants.
43
If we are unable to comply with any of these requirements, an event of default could occur which
could cause or permit holders of the debt to declare all amounts outstanding to be immediately due
and payable. In that event, we may be forced to sell assets, raise additional capital through a
securities offering, or seek to refinance or restructure our debt. In such case, we may not be
able to consummate such a sale, securities offering, or refinancing or restructuring on reasonable
terms, or at all.
Contractual Obligations
There were no material changes in our contractual obligations or commercial commitments during the
three months ended April 30, 2010.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of April 30, 2010, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that we believe have or are
reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in
financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures
or capital resources that are material to investors. There were no
material changes in our off-balance sheet arrangements since January 31, 2010.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Refer to Note 1, Basis of Presentation of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements included in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q for information regarding recent accounting
pronouncements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our financial condition due to adverse
changes in financial market prices and rates. We are exposed to market risk related to changes in
interest rates and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. To manage the volatility relating
to interest rate and foreign currency risks, we periodically enter into derivative instruments
including foreign currency forward exchange contracts and interest rate swap agreements. It is our
policy to enter into derivative transactions only to the extent considered necessary to meet our
risk management objectives. We use derivative instruments solely to reduce the financial impact of
these risks and do not use derivative instruments for trading purposes.
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2010, filed with the SEC on May 19,
2010 provides a detailed discussion of the market risks affecting our operations. We believe our
exposure to these market risks did not materially change during the quarter ended April 30, 2010.
44
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange
Act, are controls and other procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed
in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and
reported, within the time periods specified by the rules and forms promulgated by the SEC.
Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to
ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure. We conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation
of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this report. Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of April 30, 2010, our disclosure controls and
procedures were not effective because of the material weaknesses in our internal control over
financial reporting as described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31,
2010.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect every misstatement. An evaluation of effectiveness is subject to the risk that the controls
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with
policies or procedures may decrease over time.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Under applicable SEC rules (Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(c) and 15d-15(c)) management is required to
evaluate any change in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during each fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting. In evaluating whether there were any reportable changes in our
internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended April 30, 2010, we determined,
with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, that there have
been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
However, as explained in greater detail under Item 9A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended January 31, 2010, we undertook a broad range of remedial procedures prior to May 19,
2010, the filing date of the report, to address the material weaknesses in our internal control
over financial reporting identified as of January 31, 2010. Our efforts to improve our internal
controls are ongoing and focused on expanding our organizational capabilities to improve our
internal control environment, and on implementing process changes to strengthen our internal
control and monitoring activities. Therefore, while there were no changes in our internal control
over financial reporting in the three month period ended April 30, 2010 that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting, we continued monitoring the operation of these remedial measures through the date of
this report.
For a more comprehensive discussion of the material weaknesses in internal control over financial
reporting identified by management as of January 31, 2010, and the remedial measures undertaken to
address these material weaknesses, investors are encouraged to review Item 9A, Controls and
Procedures, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2010.
45
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The following is a summary of material legal proceedings which arose, or in which there were
material developments, during the quarter ended April 30, 2010.
On December 17, 2009, Comverse entered into agreements to settle the following lawsuits previously
disclosed by Comverse relating to the matters involved in the Comverse special committee
investigation which had been brought against Comverse and certain former officers and directors of
Comverse: (a) a consolidated shareholder class action before the U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of New York, In re Comverse Technology, Inc. Securities Litigation; (b) a
shareholder derivative action before the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York,
In re Comverse Technology, Inc. Derivative Litigation; and (c) a shareholder derivative action
before the New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, In re Comverse
Technology, Inc. Derivative Litigation.
On April 2, 2010, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York issued orders in the
shareholder class action and derivative action granting preliminary approval of the settlement
agreements in those actions. The court has scheduled a settlement hearing to be held on June 21,
2010 that will, among other things, consider orders and final judgments dismissing those actions
with prejudice.
Verint was not named as a defendant in any of these suits. Igal Nissim, our former Chief Financial
Officer, was named as a defendant in the federal and state shareholder derivative actions in his
capacity as the former Chief Financial Officer of Comverse, and Dan Bodner, our Chief Executive
Officer, was named as a defendant in the federal and state shareholder derivative actions in his
capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of Verint (i.e., as the president of a significant
subsidiary of Comverse). Mr. Nissim and Mr. Bodner were not named in the shareholder class action
suit.
The federal shareholder derivative suit alleged that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties
beginning in 1994 by: (a) allowing and participating in a scheme to backdate the grant dates of
employee stock options to improperly benefit Comverses executives and certain directors; (b)
allowing insiders, including certain of the defendants, to personally profit by trading Comverses
stock while in possession of material inside information; (c) failing to properly oversee or
implement procedures to detect and prevent such improper practices; (d) causing Comverse to issue
materially false and misleading proxy statements, as well as causing Comverse to file other false
and misleading documents with the SEC; and (e) exposing Comverse to civil liability. The
plaintiffs originally filed suit on April 20, 2006. The Consolidated, Amended, and Verified
Shareholder Derivative Complaint, filed on October 6, 2006, sought unspecified damages, injunctive
relief, including restricting the proceeds of the defendants trading activities and other assets,
setting aside the election of the defendant directors to the Comverse board of directors, and costs
and attorneys fees. On December 21, 2007, motions to dismiss the federal shareholder derivative
suit were fully briefed on behalf of Comverse as well as the individual defendants,
including Mr. Nissim and Mr. Bodner. No decision had been rendered on these motions to dismiss as
of the signing of the settlement agreements or as of the filing date of this report.
The state shareholder derivative suit made similar allegations to the federal shareholder
derivative suit. The plaintiffs first filed suit on April 11, 2006. The Consolidated and Amended
Shareholder Derivative Complaint, which was filed on September 18, 2006, sought unspecified
damages, injunctive relief, such as restricting the proceeds of the defendants trading activities
and other assets, and costs and attorneys fees.
46
The agreements in settlement of the above-mentioned actions are subject to notice to Comverses
shareholders and approval by the federal and state courts in which such proceedings are pending.
Neither we nor Mr. Nissim or Mr. Bodner is responsible for making any payments or relinquishing any
equity holdings under the terms of the settlement.
On July 20, 2006, we announced that, in connection with the SEC investigation into Comverses past
stock option grants that was in process at that time, we had received a letter requesting that we
voluntarily provide to the SEC certain documents and information related to our own stock option
grants and practices. We voluntarily responded to this request. On April 9, 2008, as we
previously reported, we received a Wells Notice from the staff of the SEC arising from the
staffs investigation of our past stock option grant practices and certain unrelated accounting
matters. These accounting matters were also the subject of our internal investigation. On March
3, 2010, the SEC filed a settled enforcement action against us in the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of New York relating to certain of our accounting reserve practices.
Without admitting or denying the allegations in the SECs Complaint, we consented to the issuance
of a Final Judgment permanently enjoining us from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act,
Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act, and Rules 13a-1 and 13a-13
thereunder. The settled SEC action did not require us to pay any monetary penalty and sought no
relief beyond the entry of a permanent injunction. The SECs related press release noted that, in
accepting the settlement offer, the SEC considered our remediation and cooperation in the SECs
investigation. The settlement was approved by the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of New York on March 9, 2010.
On December 23, 2009, as we previously reported, we received an additional Wells Notice from the
staff of the SEC relating to our failure to timely file periodic reports under the Exchange Act.
Under the SECs Wells process, recipients of a Wells Notice have the opportunity to make a Wells
Submission before the SEC staff makes a recommendation to the SEC regarding what action, if any,
should be brought by the SEC. After considering our Wells Submission, on March 3, 2010, the SEC
issued an Order Instituting Proceedings (OIP) pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Exchange Act to
suspend or revoke the registration of our common stock because of our previous failure to file an
annual report on either Form 10-K or Form 10-KSB since April 25, 2005 or quarterly reports on
either Form 10-Q or Form 10-QSB since December 12, 2005. On May 28, 2010, we entered into an
agreement in principle with the SECs Division of Enforcement regarding the terms of a settlement
of the SECs Section 12(j) proceeding. Under the agreement in principle, the Division of
Enforcement will recommend to the SEC that the Section 12(j) proceeding against us be dismissed if
we file our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2010 on a timely basis and file our Forms
10-Q for the quarters ended April 30, 2009, July 31, 2009, and October 31, 2009 by 5:30 p.m. EDT on
June 21, 2010.
The agreement in principle is subject to approval by the SEC. As a result of the agreement in
principle, on June 1, 2010, a joint motion by the parties to stay the Section 12(j) proceeding was
granted by the administrative law judge hearing the case and a conference was scheduled for July 2,
2010 to discuss the status of settlement. If the proceeding is not dismissed, we intend to
vigorously defend the matter.
47
On March 26, 2009, a motion to approve a class action lawsuit (the Labor Motion) and the class
action lawsuit itself (the Labor Class Action) (Labor Case No. 4186/09) were filed against our
subsidiary, Verint Systems Limited (VSL), by a former employee of VSL, Orit Deutsch, in the Tel
Aviv Labor Court. Ms. Deutsch purports to represent a class of our employees and ex-employees who
were granted options to buy shares of Verint and to whom allegedly, damages were caused as a result
of the blocking of the ability to exercise Verint options by our employees or ex-employees. The
Labor Motion and the Labor Class Action both claim that we are responsible for the alleged damages
due to our status as employer and that the blocking of Verint options from being exercised
constitutes default of the employment agreements between the members of the class and VSL. The
Labor Class Action seeks compensatory damages for the entire class in an unspecified amount. On
July 9, 2009, we filed a motion for summary dismissal and alternatively for the stay of the Labor
Motion. A preliminary session was held on July 12, 2009. Ms. Deutsch filed her response to our
response on November 10, 2009. On February 8, 2010, the Tel Aviv Labor Court dismissed the case
for lack of material jurisdiction and ruled that it will be transferred to the District Court in
Tel Aviv.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended January 31, 2010.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Equity Grants
As a result of our inability to file required SEC reports during our extended filing delay period,
we ceased using our registration statement on Form S-8 to make equity grants to employees.
On May 24, 2007, we received a no-action letter from the SEC upon which we have relied to make
broad-based equity grants to employees under a no-sale theory. We have also made equity grants to
our directors, executive officers, and certain other executives who qualify as accredited investors
in reliance upon a private placement exemption from the federal securities laws and have made a
small number of equity grants to non-U.S. employees under the exemption provided by Regulation S of
the Securities Act.
48
The following summarizes various time-based equity awards approved by the stock option committee on
the dates listed below during the three months ended April 30, 2010 (excluding directors and
executive officers) in the United States and elsewhere throughout the world under the application
of the no sale theory or under the exemption provided by Regulation S of the Securities Act:
|
|
|
March 17, 2010 equity awards representing approximately 283,850 shares; and |
|
|
|
|
April 17, 2010 equity awards representing approximately 209,900 shares. |
The following summarizes various time-based and performance-based equity awards approved by the
board of directors or the stock option committee on the dates listed below during the three months
ended April 30, 2010 under a private placement exemption to directors, executive officers, or other
employees qualifying as accredited investors (with officer performance awards included at target
levels):
|
|
|
March 17, 2010 equity awards representing approximately 426,850 shares; |
|
|
|
|
March 18, 2010 equity awards representing approximately 20,000 shares; and |
|
|
|
|
April 17, 2010 equity awards representing approximately 37,600 shares. |
All grants were made under a stockholder-approved equity compensation plan or contain vesting
conditions which require that we receive stockholder approval of a new equity compensation plan or
have additional share capacity under an existing stockholder-approved equity compensation plan for
the awards to stock vest. All grants were compensatory in nature and were issued without cost to
the employee.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table summarizes purchases made by us during the three months ended April 30, 2010.
We record any repurchases of common stock as treasury stock.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of |
|
|
Maximum number (or |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares (or units) |
|
|
approximate dollar value) of |
|
|
|
Total number of |
|
|
(b) |
|
|
purchased as part of |
|
|
shares (or units) that may yet |
|
|
|
shares (or units) |
|
|
Average price paid |
|
|
publicly announced |
|
|
be purchased under the plans |
|
Period |
|
purchased |
|
|
per share (or unit) |
|
|
plans or programs |
|
|
or programs |
|
March 2010 |
|
|
8,556 |
|
|
$ |
24.58 |
|
|
|
8,556 |
(1) |
|
|
N/A |
(1) |
April 2010 |
|
|
114,938 |
|
|
$ |
26.99 |
|
|
|
114,938 |
(1) |
|
|
N/A |
(1) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our board of directors has approved a program to repurchase shares of our common stock from our
independent directors, and such other directors as may from time to time be designated by the board
of directors, upon vesting of restricted stock grants during our extended filing delay period, in
order to provide funds to the recipient for the payment of associated income taxes. From time to
time, our board of directors has also approved repurchases from executive officers for the same
purpose when a vesting has occurred during a blackout period and on November 24, 2009, the board of
directors approved a repurchase program for our executive officers similar to the one for our
directors. On June 4, 2010, the officer repurchase program was
extended through the date of our next meeting of stockholders at
which a new equity incentive plan is approved. |
49
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Removed and Reserved
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
The following exhibit list includes exhibits that we entered into or that became effective during
the quarter ended April 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filed Herewith / Incorporated by |
Number |
|
Description |
|
Reference from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.01 |
|
|
Form of Time-Based
Restricted Stock Unit
Award Agreement Solely
Related to 2010 Grant*
|
|
Form 10-K filed on April 8, 2010 |
|
10.02 |
|
|
Form of
Performance-Based
Restricted Stock Unit
Award Agreement Solely
Related to 2010 Grant*
|
|
Form 10-K filed on April 8, 2010 |
|
10.03 |
|
|
Form of Time-Based
Deferred Stock Award
Agreement Solely Related
to 2010 Grant*
|
|
Form 10-K filed on April 8, 2010 |
|
10.04 |
|
|
Form of
Performance-Based
Deferred Stock Award
Agreement Solely Related
to 2010 Grant*
|
|
Form 10-K filed on April 8, 2010 |
|
10.05 |
|
|
Employment Agreement,
dated February 23, 2010,
between Verint Systems
Inc. and Dan Bodner*
|
|
Form 8-K filed on February 23, 2010 |
|
10.06 |
|
|
Summary of the Terms of
Verint Systems Inc.
Executive Officer Annual
Bonus Plan*
|
|
Form 10-K filed on May 19, 2010 |
|
10.07 |
|
|
Amendment, Waiver, and
Consent, dated April 27,
2010, to Credit
Agreement among the
Company, as Borrower,
the Lenders, as parties
thereto, and Credit
Suisse AG, Cayman
|
|
Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2010 |
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Dan
Bodner, Chief Executive
Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
|
Filed Herewith |
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filed Herewith / Incorporated by |
Number |
|
Description |
|
Reference from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Douglas
E. Robinson, Chief
Financial Officer
pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
Filed Herewith |
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of the
Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to Securities
Exchange Act Rule
13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350
(1)
|
|
Filed Herewith |
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of the
Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to Securities
Exchange Act Rule
13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350
(1)
|
|
Filed Herewith |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These exhibits are being furnished with this periodic report and are not deemed filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not incorporated by reference in any filing of
the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
* |
|
Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an
exhibit to this form pursuant to Item 6 of this report. |
51
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VERINT SYSTEMS INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 9, 2010 |
|
/s/ Dan Bodner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Bodner |
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 9, 2010 |
|
/s/ Douglas E. Robinson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Douglas E. Robinson |
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
52