e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended May 31, 2011
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-14063
JABIL CIRCUIT, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
38-1886260 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
10560 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Street North, St. Petersburg, Florida 33716
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(727) 577-9749
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of June 22, 2011, there were 218,597,347 shares of the registrants Common Stock outstanding.
JABIL CIRCUIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1: |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
JABIL CIRCUIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
|
|
2011 (Unaudited) |
|
|
2010 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
911,145 |
|
|
$ |
744,329 |
|
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $6,789 at May 31, 2011 and
$13,939 at August 31, 2010 |
|
|
1,045,238 |
|
|
|
1,408,319 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
2,257,984 |
|
|
|
2,094,135 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
807,666 |
|
|
|
349,165 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
35,467 |
|
|
|
35,560 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
19,040 |
|
|
|
22,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
5,076,540 |
|
|
|
4,654,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $1,322,531 at May 31, 2011 and
$1,166,807 at August 31, 2010 |
|
|
1,593,406 |
|
|
|
1,451,392 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
33,943 |
|
|
|
28,455 |
|
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $124,274 at May 31, 2011 and $112,687 at August
31, 2010 |
|
|
95,137 |
|
|
|
104,113 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
69,051 |
|
|
|
55,101 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
87,491 |
|
|
|
74,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
6,955,568 |
|
|
$ |
6,367,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current installments of notes payable and long-term debt |
|
$ |
80,449 |
|
|
$ |
167,566 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
2,752,668 |
|
|
|
2,741,719 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
863,887 |
|
|
|
672,252 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
34,270 |
|
|
|
19,236 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
4,584 |
|
|
|
4,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
3,735,858 |
|
|
|
3,605,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and long-term debt, less current installments |
|
|
1,107,195 |
|
|
|
1,018,930 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
69,713 |
|
|
|
63,058 |
|
Income tax liability |
|
|
86,718 |
|
|
|
86,351 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
6,709 |
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
5,006,193 |
|
|
|
4,774,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jabil Circuit, Inc. stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, authorized 500,000,000 shares; 223,671,180 and 219,532,908
shares issued and 213,954,794 and 210,496,989 shares outstanding at May 31, 2011 and August 31,
2010, respectively |
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,619,003 |
|
|
|
1,541,507 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
342,725 |
|
|
|
123,303 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
190,188 |
|
|
|
122,062 |
|
Treasury stock at cost, 9,716,386 shares at May 31, 2011 and 9,035,919 shares at August 31, 2010 |
|
|
(218,785 |
) |
|
|
(209,046 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Jabil Circuit, Inc. stockholders equity |
|
|
1,933,355 |
|
|
|
1,578,046 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
16,020 |
|
|
|
14,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
1,949,375 |
|
|
|
1,592,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
6,955,568 |
|
|
$ |
6,367,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
JABIL CIRCUIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except for per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
4,227,688 |
|
|
$ |
3,455,578 |
|
|
$ |
12,238,532 |
|
|
$ |
9,548,478 |
|
Cost of revenue |
|
|
3,909,312 |
|
|
|
3,193,464 |
|
|
|
11,313,165 |
|
|
|
8,831,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
318,376 |
|
|
|
262,114 |
|
|
|
925,367 |
|
|
|
716,636 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
154,112 |
|
|
|
151,409 |
|
|
|
438,368 |
|
|
|
429,226 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
6,544 |
|
|
|
6,331 |
|
|
|
18,825 |
|
|
|
21,453 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
5,187 |
|
|
|
6,206 |
|
|
|
16,821 |
|
|
|
19,954 |
|
Restructuring and impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,635 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
5,705 |
|
Settlement of receivables and related charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,944 |
|
|
|
15,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
152,533 |
|
|
|
96,533 |
|
|
|
413,174 |
|
|
|
224,576 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
1,771 |
|
|
|
960 |
|
|
|
2,418 |
|
|
|
3,123 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(897 |
) |
|
|
(626 |
) |
|
|
(2,486 |
) |
|
|
(2,177 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
25,149 |
|
|
|
19,503 |
|
|
|
73,088 |
|
|
|
59,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax |
|
|
126,510 |
|
|
|
76,696 |
|
|
|
340,154 |
|
|
|
163,981 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
22,222 |
|
|
|
24,009 |
|
|
|
72,737 |
|
|
|
52,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
104,288 |
|
|
|
52,687 |
|
|
|
267,417 |
|
|
|
111,390 |
|
Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling
interests, net of income tax expense |
|
|
(407 |
) |
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
1,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Jabil Circuit, Inc. |
|
$ |
104,695 |
|
|
$ |
52,031 |
|
|
$ |
266,775 |
|
|
$ |
110,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share attributable to the
stockholders of Jabil Circuit, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
1.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
215,705 |
|
|
|
213,881 |
|
|
|
215,092 |
|
|
|
214,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
222,337 |
|
|
|
216,522 |
|
|
|
220,773 |
|
|
|
218,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
JABIL CIRCUIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
104,288 |
|
|
$ |
52,687 |
|
|
$ |
267,417 |
|
|
$ |
111,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
25,552 |
|
|
|
(45,338 |
) |
|
|
61,548 |
|
|
|
(70,643 |
) |
Change in fair value of derivative instruments, net of tax |
|
|
4,340 |
|
|
|
(1,711 |
) |
|
|
6,869 |
|
|
|
(1,877 |
) |
Amortization of (gain) loss on hedge arrangements, net of tax |
|
|
(923 |
) |
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
|
3,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
133,257 |
|
|
|
6,279 |
|
|
|
335,543 |
|
|
|
42,048 |
|
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(407 |
) |
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
1,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to Jabil Circuit, Inc. |
|
$ |
133,664 |
|
|
$ |
5,623 |
|
|
$ |
334,901 |
|
|
$ |
40,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments were $230.0 million at May 31, 2011
and $168.4 million at August 31, 2010. Foreign currency translation adjustments primarily consist
of adjustments to consolidate subsidiaries that use a foreign currency as their functional
currency.
See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
JABIL CIRCUIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(in thousands, except for share data)
(Unaudited)
Jabil Circuit, Inc. Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Par |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Interests |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance at August 31, 2010 |
|
|
210,496,989 |
|
|
$ |
220 |
|
|
$ |
1,541,507 |
|
|
$ |
123,303 |
|
|
$ |
122,062 |
|
|
$ |
(209,046 |
) |
|
$ |
14,726 |
|
|
$ |
1,592,772 |
|
Shares issued upon exercise of
stock options |
|
|
857,664 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
12,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,129 |
|
Shares issued under employee
stock purchase plan |
|
|
506,250 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,649 |
|
Issuance and vesting of
restricted stock awards |
|
|
2,774,115 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of treasury stock
under employee stock plans |
|
|
(680,224 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,739 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,739 |
) |
Recognition of stock-based
compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,660 |
|
Tax benefit of options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
Declared dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,353 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,353 |
) |
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266,775 |
|
|
|
68,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
335,543 |
|
Foreign currency adjustments
attributable to noncontrolling
interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at May 31, 2011 |
|
|
213,954,794 |
|
|
$ |
224 |
|
|
$ |
1,619,003 |
|
|
$ |
342,725 |
|
|
$ |
190,188 |
|
|
$ |
(218,785 |
) |
|
$ |
16,020 |
|
|
$ |
1,949,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
JABIL CIRCUIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
267,417 |
|
|
$ |
111,390 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
234,312 |
|
|
|
211,943 |
|
Recognition of deferred grant proceeds |
|
|
(1,466 |
) |
|
|
(1,467 |
) |
Amortization of loss on hedge arrangement |
|
|
2,963 |
|
|
|
2,963 |
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs and discount |
|
|
3,990 |
|
|
|
2,770 |
|
Write-off of debt issuance costs |
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
|
|
Recognition of stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
59,854 |
|
|
|
67,980 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(2,305 |
) |
|
|
(8,230 |
) |
Restructuring and impairment charges |
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
5,705 |
|
Provision for allowance for doubtful accounts and notes receivable |
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
(222 |
) |
Excess tax benefit from options exercised |
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
(118 |
) |
Loss on sale of property |
|
|
3,061 |
|
|
|
4,607 |
|
Settlement of receivables and related charges |
|
|
12,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of subsidiaries |
|
|
23,944 |
|
|
|
12,756 |
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities, exclusive of net assets acquired: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable |
|
|
100,226 |
|
|
|
(70,093 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(187,146 |
) |
|
|
(607,742 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(145,384 |
) |
|
|
(126,005 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(10,011 |
) |
|
|
1,556 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
148,289 |
|
|
|
509,838 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
12,181 |
|
|
|
24,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
524,417 |
|
|
|
142,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for business and intangible asset acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(320,965 |
) |
|
|
(245,118 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
13,669 |
|
|
|
7,257 |
|
Cost of receivables acquired, net of cash collections |
|
|
(521 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds on disposal of available for sale investments |
|
|
5,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(298,032 |
) |
|
|
(237,861 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under debt agreements |
|
|
5,706,610 |
|
|
|
3,703,460 |
|
Payments toward debt agreements |
|
|
(5,714,853 |
) |
|
|
(3,812,960 |
) |
Net proceeds from exercise of stock options and issuance of common stock under
employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
17,778 |
|
|
|
6,210 |
|
Treasury stock minimum tax withholding related to vesting of restricted stock |
|
|
(9,739 |
) |
|
|
(5,487 |
) |
Dividends paid to stockholders |
|
|
(45,306 |
) |
|
|
(44,901 |
) |
Bond issuance costs |
|
|
(14,549 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of ordinary shares of certain subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
586 |
|
Bank overdraft of subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,665 |
|
Excess tax benefit from options exercised |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(59,880 |
) |
|
|
(143,309 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
(36,929 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
166,816 |
|
|
|
(275,923 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
744,329 |
|
|
|
876,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
911,145 |
|
|
$ |
600,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
JABIL CIRCUIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly,
they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete
financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
accruals) necessary to present fairly the information set forth therein have been included. The
accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction
with the Consolidated Financial Statements and footnotes included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Jabil Circuit, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010. Results for the
three month and nine month periods ended May 31, 2011 are not necessarily an indication of the
results that may be expected for the full fiscal year ending August 31, 2011.
Certain amounts in the prior periods financial statements have been reclassified to conform
to the current periods presentation.
Note 2. Inventories
The components of inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
1,577,751 |
|
|
$ |
1,509,886 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
402,572 |
|
|
|
390,069 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
277,661 |
|
|
|
194,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
$ |
2,257,984 |
|
|
$ |
2,094,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 3. Earnings Per Share and Dividends
a. Earnings Per Share
The Company calculates its basic earnings per share by dividing net income attributable to
Jabil Circuit, Inc. by the weighted average number of common shares and participating securities
outstanding during the period. In periods of a net loss, participating securities are not included
in the basic loss per share calculation as such participating securities are not contractually
obligated to fund losses. The Companys diluted earnings per share is calculated in a similar
manner, but includes the effect of dilutive securities. To the extent these securities are
anti-dilutive, they are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share. The following
table sets forth the calculations of basic and diluted earnings per share attributable to the
stockholders of Jabil Circuit, Inc. (in thousands, except earnings per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Jabil Circuit, Inc. |
|
$ |
104,695 |
|
|
$ |
52,031 |
|
|
$ |
266,775 |
|
|
$ |
110,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic and diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
213,862 |
|
|
|
209,813 |
|
|
|
212,876 |
|
|
|
209,121 |
|
Share-based payment awards classified as participating securities |
|
|
1,843 |
|
|
|
4,068 |
|
|
|
2,216 |
|
|
|
4,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic earnings per share |
|
|
215,705 |
|
|
|
213,881 |
|
|
|
215,092 |
|
|
|
214,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive common shares issuable under the employee stock purchase
plan and upon exercise of stock options and stock appreciation
rights |
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
Dilutive unvested restricted stock awards |
|
|
5,826 |
|
|
|
2,228 |
|
|
|
4,812 |
|
|
|
3,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per share |
|
|
222,337 |
|
|
|
216,522 |
|
|
|
220,773 |
|
|
|
218,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income attributable to the stockholders of Jabil Circuit, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
1.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
For the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2011, options to purchase
4,107,337 and 4,120,993 shares of common stock, respectively, and 5,288,984 and 5,360,899 stock
appreciation rights, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share
as their effect would have been anti-dilutive. For the three months and nine months ended May 31,
2010, options to purchase 5,204,495 and 6,319,622 shares of common stock, respectively, and
7,990,732 and 7,997,232 stock appreciation rights, respectively, were excluded from the computation
of diluted earnings per share as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
b. Dividends
The following table sets forth certain information relating to the Companys cash dividends
declared to common stockholders of the Company during the nine months ended May 31, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend |
|
Dividend |
|
Dividends |
|
Date of Record for |
|
Dividend Cash |
|
|
Declaration Date |
|
per Share |
|
Declared |
|
Dividend Payment |
|
Payment Date |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except for per share data) |
|
|
Fiscal year 2011: |
|
October 25, 2010 |
|
$0.07 |
|
$15,563 |
|
November 15, 2010 |
|
December 1, 2010 |
|
|
January 25, 2011 |
|
$0.07 |
|
$15,634 |
|
February 15, 2011 |
|
March 1, 2011 |
|
|
April 13, 2011 |
|
$0.07 |
|
$15,647 |
|
May 16, 2011 |
|
June 1, 2011 |
Fiscal year 2010: |
|
October 22, 2009 |
|
$0.07 |
|
$15,186 |
(1) |
November 16, 2009 |
|
December 1, 2009 |
|
|
January 22, 2010 |
|
$0.07 |
|
$15,238 |
|
February 16, 2010 |
|
March 1, 2010 |
|
|
April 14, 2010 |
|
$0.07 |
|
$15,221 |
|
May 17, 2010 |
|
June 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Of the $15.2 million in total dividends declared during the first quarter of
fiscal year 2010, $14.4 million was paid out of additional paid-in capital (which
represents the amount of dividends declared in excess of the Companys retained earnings
balance as of the date that the dividend was declared). |
Note 4. Stock-Based Compensation
The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense, reduced for estimated forfeitures, on
a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally the
vesting period for outstanding stock awards. The Company recorded $20.1 million and $59.9 million
of stock-based compensation expense gross of tax effects, which is included in selling, general and
administrative expenses within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three
months and nine months ended May 31, 2011, respectively. The Company recorded tax effects related
to the stock-based compensation expense of $0.8 million and $1.6 million, which is included in
income tax expense within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months and nine months ended May
31, 2011, respectively. Included in the compensation expense recognized by the Company are $0.9
million and $2.9 million related to the Companys employee stock purchase plan (ESPP) during the
three months and nine months ended May 31, 2011, respectively. The Company recorded $27.5 million
and $68.0 million of gross stock-based compensation expense, which is included in selling, general
and administrative expenses within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
three months and nine months ended May 31, 2010, respectively. The Company recorded tax effects
related to the stock-based compensation expense of $0.7 million and $1.3 million, which is included
in income tax expense within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three
months and nine months ended May 31, 2010, respectively. Included in the compensation expense
recognized by the Company are $0.8 million and $3.0 million related to the Companys ESPP during
the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2010, respectively. The Company capitalizes
stock-based compensation costs related to awards granted to employees whose compensation costs are
directly attributable to the cost of inventory. At May 31, 2011 and August 31, 2010, $0.3 million
and $0.2 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation costs were classified as inventories on
the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Cash received from exercises under all share-based payment arrangements,
including the Companys ESPP, for the nine months ended May 31, 2011 and 2010 was $17.8 million and
$6.2 million, respectively. The proceeds for the nine months ended May 31, 2011 and 2010 were
offset by $9.7 million and $5.5 million, respectively, of restricted shares withheld by the Company
to satisfy the minimum amount of its income tax withholding requirements. The market value of the
restricted shares withheld was determined on the date that the restricted shares vested and
resulted in the withholding of 680,224 shares and 350,747 shares of the Companys common stock
during the nine months ended May 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The shares have been classified
as treasury stock on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company currently expects to
satisfy share-based awards with registered shares available to be issued.
9
A new stock award and incentive plan (the 2011 Plan) was adopted by the Board of Directors
during the first quarter of fiscal year 2011 and approved by the stockholders during the second
quarter of fiscal year 2011. The 2011 Plan provides for the granting of restricted stock awards,
restricted stock unit awards and other stock-based awards. The maximum aggregate number of shares
that may be subject to awards under the 2011 Plan is 8,850,000. If any portion of an outstanding
award that was granted under the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2002 Plan), which was terminated
immediately upon the effectiveness of the 2011 Plan, for any reason expires or is terminated or
canceled or forfeited on or after the date of termination of the 2002 Plan, the shares allocable to
the expired, terminated, canceled, or forfeited portion of such 2002 Plan award shall be available
for issuance under the 2011 Plan.
The current ESPP was adopted by the Companys Board of Directors during the first quarter of
fiscal year 2002 and approved by the shareholders during the second quarter of fiscal year 2002.
Initially there were 2,000,000 shares reserved under the current ESPP. An additional 2,000,000
shares and 3,000,000 shares were authorized for issuance under the current ESPP and approved by
stockholders during the second quarter of fiscal years 2006 and 2009, respectively. A new ESPP was
adopted by the Companys Board of Directors during the first quarter of fiscal year 2011 and
approved by the shareholders during the second quarter of fiscal year 2011 with 6,000,000 shares
authorized for issuance. The new ESPP will begin issuing shares after the purchase period ending
June 30, 2011. The Company also adopted a tax advantaged sub-plan under the ESPP for its Indian
employees. Shares are issued under the Indian sub-plan from the authorized shares under the ESPP.
a. Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Right Plans
The Company applies a lattice valuation model for stock options and stock appreciation rights
granted (collectively known as Options), excluding those granted under the ESPP. The lattice
valuation model is a more flexible analysis to value employee Options, as compared to a
Black-Scholes model, because of its ability to incorporate inputs that change over time, such as
volatility and interest rates, and to allow for actual exercise behavior of Option holders.
There were no options granted during the nine months ended May 31, 2011. The
weighted-average grant-date fair value per share of Options granted during the nine months ended
May 31, 2010 was $6.36. The total intrinsic value of Options exercised during the nine months ended
May 31, 2011 and 2010 was $4.8 million and $0.3 million, respectively. As of May 31, 2011, there
was $1.8 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested Options that is expected
to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years. The total fair value of Options
vested during the nine months ended May 31, 2011 and 2010 was $6.2 million and $14.0 million,
respectively.
Following are the grant date weighted-average and range assumptions, where applicable, used
for each respective period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
May 31, |
|
May 31, |
|
May 31, |
|
May 31, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
0.1% to 3.4% |
Weighted-average expected volatility |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
60.2 |
% |
Weighted-average expected life |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
5.6 years |
|
|
|
* |
|
The Company did not grant Options during the three months ended May 31, 2011 and 2010 and the
nine months ended May 31, 2011. |
The following table summarizes Option activity from August 31, 2010 through May 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
Available |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
|
for Grant |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Life (years) |
|
Balance at August 31, 2010 |
|
|
10,480,001 |
|
|
|
13,154,272 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
24.10 |
|
|
|
4.09 |
|
Shares no longer available for grant due
to terminated 2002 Stock Plan |
|
|
(5,896,748 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options authorized |
|
|
8,850,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options expired |
|
|
(817,611 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
Available |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
|
for Grant |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Life (years) |
|
Options canceled |
|
|
1,196,848 |
|
|
|
(1,196,848 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock awards(1) |
|
|
(4,686,743 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(868,151 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at May 31, 2011 |
|
|
9,125,747 |
|
|
|
11,089,273 |
|
|
$ |
13,512 |
|
|
$ |
24.25 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at May 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,816,915 |
|
|
$ |
13,052 |
|
|
$ |
24.37 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the maximum number of shares that can be issued based on the
achievement of certain performance criteria. |
b. Restricted Stock Awards
Certain key employees have been granted time-based, performance-based, and market-based
restricted stock awards. The time-based restricted awards granted generally vest on a graded
vesting schedule over three years. The performance-based restricted awards generally vest on a
cliff vesting schedule over three years and provide a range of vesting possibilities from 0% to
200%, depending on the level of achievement of the specified performance condition. The
market-based restricted awards have a vesting condition that is tied to the Standard and Poors 500
Composite Index (S&P).
The stock-based compensation expense for these restricted stock awards (including restricted
stock and restricted stock units) is measured at fair value on the date of grant based on the
number of shares expected to vest and the quoted market price of the Companys common stock. For
restricted stock awards with performance conditions, stock-based compensation expense is originally
based on the number of shares that would vest if the Company achieved 100% of the performance goal,
which was the probable outcome at the grant date. Throughout the requisite service period,
management monitors the probability of achievement of the performance condition. If it becomes
probable, based on the Companys performance, that more or less than the current estimate of the
awarded shares will vest, an adjustment to stock-based compensation expense will be recognized as a
change in accounting estimate. For restricted stock awards with market conditions, the market
conditions are considered in the grant date fair value of the award using a lattice model, which
utilizes multiple input variables to determine the probability of the Company achieving the
specified market conditions. Stock-based compensation expense related to an award with a market
condition will be recognized over the requisite service period regardless of whether the market
condition is satisfied, provided that the requisite service period has been completed.
At May 31, 2011, there was $82.9 million of total unrecognized stock-based compensation
expense related to restricted stock awards granted under the 2002 Plan and 2011 Plan. This expense
is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years.
The following table summarizes restricted stock activity from August 31, 2010 through May 31,
2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Non-vested balance at August 31, 2010 |
|
|
12,189,271 |
|
|
$ |
13.13 |
|
Changes during the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares granted(1) |
|
|
6,160,013 |
|
|
$ |
14.27 |
|
Shares vested |
|
|
(2,678,115 |
) |
|
$ |
16.98 |
|
Shares forfeited |
|
|
(1,473,270 |
) |
|
$ |
13.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested balance at May 31, 2011 |
|
|
14,197,899 |
|
|
$ |
12.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the maximum number of shares that can vest based on the
achievement of certain performance criteria. |
c. Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Employees are eligible to participate in the ESPP after 90 days of employment with the
Company. The ESPP permits eligible employees to purchase common stock through payroll deductions,
which may not exceed 10% of an employees compensation, as
11
defined in the ESPP, at a price equal to 85% of the fair value of the common stock at the
beginning or end of the offering period, whichever
is lower. The ESPP is intended to qualify under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code.
The maximum number of shares that a participant may purchase in an
offering period is determined in June and December. As such, there were 506,250 and 740,720 shares
purchased under the ESPP during the nine months ended May 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. At May
31, 2011, a total of 6,297,969 shares had been issued under the ESPP.
The fair value of shares issued under the ESPP was estimated on the commencement date of each
offering period using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following weighted-average
assumptions were used in the model for each respective period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
May 31, |
|
May 31, |
|
May 31, |
|
May 31, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Weighted-average expected volatility |
|
|
49.7 |
% |
|
|
49.0 |
% |
|
|
49.7 |
% |
|
|
49.0 |
% |
Expected life |
|
.5 years |
|
.5 years |
|
.5 years |
|
.5 years |
Note 5. Concentration of Risk and Segment Data
a. Concentration of Risk
The Company operates in 24 countries worldwide. Sales to unaffiliated customers are based on
the Companys location that provides the comprehensive electronics design, production and product
management services. The following table sets forth external net revenue, net of intercompany
eliminations, and long-lived asset information where individual countries represent a material
portion of the total (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
External net revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexico |
|
$ |
944,212 |
|
|
$ |
906,408 |
|
|
$ |
2,903,047 |
|
|
$ |
2,465,588 |
|
China |
|
|
833,104 |
|
|
|
568,882 |
|
|
|
2,428,246 |
|
|
|
1,706,632 |
|
United States |
|
|
601,659 |
|
|
|
541,154 |
|
|
|
1,746,466 |
|
|
|
1,479,988 |
|
Hungary |
|
|
526,022 |
|
|
|
340,856 |
|
|
|
1,365,038 |
|
|
|
862,959 |
|
Malaysia |
|
|
298,788 |
|
|
|
329,131 |
|
|
|
855,336 |
|
|
|
828,972 |
|
Singapore |
|
|
285,334 |
|
|
|
9,054 |
|
|
|
648,944 |
|
|
|
13,380 |
|
Other |
|
|
738,569 |
|
|
|
760,093 |
|
|
|
2,291,455 |
|
|
|
2,190,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,227,688 |
|
|
$ |
3,455,578 |
|
|
$ |
12,238,532 |
|
|
$ |
9,548,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Long-lived assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China |
|
$ |
542,334 |
|
|
$ |
483,181 |
|
United States |
|
|
260,088 |
|
|
|
255,108 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
197,919 |
|
|
|
212,409 |
|
Poland |
|
|
126,306 |
|
|
|
98,395 |
|
Taiwan |
|
|
118,885 |
|
|
|
110,237 |
|
Malaysia |
|
|
118,104 |
|
|
|
102,700 |
|
Other |
|
|
358,850 |
|
|
|
321,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,722,486 |
|
|
$ |
1,583,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total foreign source net revenue represented 85.8% and 85.7% of net revenue for the three
months and nine months ended May 31, 2011, respectively, compared to 84.3% and 84.5% for the three
months and nine months ended May 31, 2010, respectively.
Sales of the Companys products are concentrated among specific customers. For the nine months
ended May 31, 2011, the Companys five largest customers accounted for approximately 48% of its net
revenue and 48 customers accounted for approximately
12
90% of its net revenue. Sales to the above
customers were reported in the Diversified Manufacturing Services (DMS), Enterprise &
Infrastructure (E&I) and High Velocity Systems (HVS) segments.
Production levels for the DMS and HVS segments are subject to seasonal influences. The Company
may realize greater net revenue during its first fiscal quarter due to higher demand for consumer
related products manufactured in the DMS and HVS segments during the holiday selling season.
Therefore, quarterly results should not be relied upon as necessarily being indicative of results
for the entire fiscal year.
b. Segment Data
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise that engage in business
activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses; for which separate financial
information is available; and whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the chief operating
decision maker to assess the performance of the individual segment and make decisions about
resources to be allocated to the segment.
The Company derives its revenue from providing comprehensive electronics design, production
and product management services. Management, including the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief
Financial Officer and the Chief Operating Officer evaluates performance and allocates resources on
a segment basis. Prior to the first quarter of fiscal year 2011, the Company managed its business
based on three segments, Electronic Manufacturing Services, Consumer and Aftermarket Services. On
September 1, 2010, the Company reorganized its reporting structure to align with the chief
operating decision makers management of resource allocation and performance assessment.
Accordingly, the Companys operating segments now consist of three segments DMS, E&I and HVS.
All prior period disclosures below have been restated to reflect this change.
Net revenue for the operating segments is attributed to the segment in which the service is
performed. An operating segments performance is evaluated based on its pre-tax operating
contribution, or segment income. Segment income is defined as net revenue less cost of revenue,
segment selling, general and administrative expenses, segment research and development expenses and
an allocation of corporate manufacturing expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses,
and does not include stock-based compensation expense, amortization of intangibles, restructuring
and impairment charges, settlement of receivables and related charges, loss on disposal of
subsidiaries, other expense, interest income, interest expense, income tax expense or adjustment
for net income attributable to noncontrolling interests. Total segment assets are defined as trade
accounts receivable, inventories, net customer-related machinery and equipment, intangible assets
net of accumulated amortization and goodwill. All other non-segment assets are reviewed on a global
basis by management.
The following table sets forth operating segment information (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DMS |
|
$ |
1,532,902 |
|
|
$ |
1,064,315 |
|
|
$ |
4,328,907 |
|
|
$ |
2,968,920 |
|
E&I |
|
|
1,382,633 |
|
|
|
1,197,479 |
|
|
|
3,783,550 |
|
|
|
3,138,725 |
|
HVS |
|
|
1,312,153 |
|
|
|
1,193,784 |
|
|
|
4,126,075 |
|
|
|
3,440,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,227,688 |
|
|
$ |
3,455,578 |
|
|
$ |
12,238,532 |
|
|
$ |
9,548,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income and reconciliation of
income before income tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
DMS |
|
$ |
94,338 |
|
|
$ |
61,107 |
|
|
$ |
275,522 |
|
|
$ |
160,489 |
|
E&I |
|
|
54,052 |
|
|
|
56,795 |
|
|
|
163,410 |
|
|
|
133,601 |
|
HVS |
|
|
29,383 |
|
|
|
13,959 |
|
|
|
89,096 |
|
|
|
39,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment income |
|
|
177,773 |
|
|
|
131,861 |
|
|
|
528,028 |
|
|
|
333,937 |
|
Reconciling items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
20,053 |
|
|
|
27,487 |
|
|
|
59,854 |
|
|
|
67,980 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
5,187 |
|
|
|
6,206 |
|
|
|
16,821 |
|
|
|
19,954 |
|
Restructuring and impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,635 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
5,705 |
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Settlement of receivables and related charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,944 |
|
|
|
15,722 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
1,771 |
|
|
|
960 |
|
|
|
2,418 |
|
|
|
3,123 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(897 |
) |
|
|
(626 |
) |
|
|
(2,486 |
) |
|
|
(2,177 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
25,149 |
|
|
|
19,503 |
|
|
|
73,088 |
|
|
|
59,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax |
|
$ |
126,510 |
|
|
$ |
76,696 |
|
|
$ |
340,154 |
|
|
$ |
163,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DMS |
|
$ |
2,331,431 |
|
|
$ |
2,194,998 |
|
E&I |
|
|
1,291,140 |
|
|
|
1,033,910 |
|
HVS |
|
|
1,154,217 |
|
|
|
1,469,476 |
|
Other non-allocated assets |
|
|
2,178,780 |
|
|
|
1,669,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,955,568 |
|
|
$ |
6,367,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6. Commitments and Contingencies
a. Legal Proceedings
The Company is party to certain lawsuits in the ordinary course of business. The Company does
not believe that these
proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Companys
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
b. Warranty Provision
The Company maintains a provision for limited warranty repair of shipped products, which is
established under the terms of specific manufacturing contract agreements. The warranty liability
is included in accrued expenses on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The warranty period
varies by product and customer industry sector. The provision represents managements estimate of
probable liabilities, calculated as a function of sales volume and historical repair experience,
for each product under warranty. The estimate is re-evaluated periodically for accuracy. A
rollforward of the warranty liability for the nine months ended May 31, 2011 and 2010 is as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Balance at August 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
10,828 |
|
Accruals for warranties |
|
|
5,762 |
|
Warranty liabilities acquired |
|
|
3,986 |
|
Settlements |
|
|
(6,900 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at May 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
13,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Balance at August 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
14,280 |
|
Accruals for warranties |
|
|
5,434 |
|
Settlements |
|
|
(6,196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at May 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
13,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
14
Note 7. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The Company performs a goodwill impairment analysis using the two-step method on an annual
basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be
recoverable. The recoverability of goodwill is measured at the reporting unit level, which the
Company has determined to be consistent with its operating segments, by comparing the reporting
units carrying amount, including goodwill, to the fair value of the reporting unit. If the
carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, goodwill is considered impaired and a
second step is performed to measure the amount of loss, if any.
The Company completed its annual impairment test for goodwill during the fourth quarter of
fiscal year 2010 and determined the fair values of the reporting units were substantially in excess
of the carrying values and that no impairment existed as of the date of the impairment test. For
each annual impairment test the Company consistently determines the fair value of its reporting
units based on an average weighting of both projected discounted future results and the use of
comparative market multiples. On September 1, 2010, the Company reorganized its business into the
DMS, E&I and HVS segments. In doing so, the Company reassigned its goodwill to the new reporting
units (which are deemed to be consistent with the new segments) and was required to perform an
interim goodwill impairment test based on these new reporting units. Based on this interim goodwill
impairment test, the Company determined that the fair values of its new reporting units were
substantially in excess of the carrying values and that no impairment existed as of the date of the
interim impairment test.
The following table presents the changes in goodwill allocated to the Companys reportable
segments during the nine months ended May 31, 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
& |
|
|
Currency |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
|
|
Reportable Segment |
|
Balance |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Impact |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Net Balance |
|
DMS |
|
$ |
583,423 |
|
|
$ |
(558,768 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
554 |
|
|
$ |
583,977 |
|
|
$ |
(558,768 |
) |
|
$ |
25,209 |
|
E&I |
|
|
335,584 |
|
|
|
(331,784 |
) |
|
|
4,128 |
|
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
340,518 |
|
|
|
(331,784 |
) |
|
|
8,734 |
|
HVS |
|
|
132,269 |
|
|
|
(132,269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,269 |
|
|
|
(132,269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,051,276 |
|
|
$ |
(1,022,821 |
) |
|
$ |
4,128 |
|
|
$ |
1,360 |
|
|
$ |
1,056,764 |
|
|
$ |
(1,022,821 |
) |
|
$ |
33,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets consist primarily of contractual agreements and customer relationships,
which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 10 years, intellectual
property which is being amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of up to five years and a
trade name which has an indefinite life. The Company completed its annual impairment test for its
indefinite-lived intangible asset during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010 and determined that
no impairment existed as of the date of the impairment test. Significant judgments inherent in this
analysis included assumptions regarding appropriate revenue growth rates, discount rates and
royalty rates. No significant residual value is estimated for the amortizable intangible assets.
The value of the Companys intangible assets purchased through business acquisitions is principally
determined based on valuations of the net assets acquired. The following tables present the
Companys total purchased intangible assets at May 31, 2011 and August 31, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
carrying |
|
May 31, 2011 |
|
amount |
|
|
amortization |
|
|
amount |
|
Contractual agreements and customer relationships |
|
$ |
85,283 |
|
|
$ |
(51,217 |
) |
|
$ |
34,066 |
|
Intellectual property |
|
|
80,561 |
|
|
|
(73,057 |
) |
|
|
7,504 |
|
Trade name |
|
|
53,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
219,411 |
|
|
$ |
(124,274 |
) |
|
$ |
95,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
carrying |
|
August 31, 2010 |
|
amount |
|
|
amortization |
|
|
amount |
|
Contractual agreements and customer relationships |
|
$ |
83,746 |
|
|
$ |
(43,698 |
) |
|
$ |
40,048 |
|
Intellectual property |
|
|
85,166 |
|
|
|
(68,989 |
) |
|
|
16,177 |
|
Trade name |
|
|
47,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
216,800 |
|
|
$ |
(112,687 |
) |
|
$ |
104,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
The weighted-average amortization period for aggregate net intangible assets at May 31,
2011 is 7.6 years, which includes a weighted-average amortization period of 9.4 years for net
contractual agreements and customer relationships and a weighted-average amortization period of 5.0
years for net intellectual property.
The estimated future amortization expense is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ending August 31, |
|
Amount |
|
2011 (remaining three months) |
|
$ |
5,242 |
|
2012 |
|
|
13,470 |
|
2013 |
|
|
8,915 |
|
2014 |
|
|
7,684 |
|
2015 |
|
|
4,752 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
1,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
41,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8. Trade Accounts Receivable Securitization and Sale Programs
The Company regularly sells designated pools of trade accounts receivable under two asset-backed
securitization programs, two trade accounts receivable sale programs and a factoring program.
a. Asset-Backed Securitization Program
In connection with the asset-backed securitization program, the Company regularly sells a
designated pool of trade accounts receivable to a wholly-owned subsidiary, which in turn sells 100%
of the eligible receivables to conduits, administered by unaffiliated financial institutions. This
wholly-owned subsidiary is a separate bankruptcy-remote entity and its assets would be available
first to satisfy the creditor claims of the conduits. As the receivables sold are collected, the
wholly-owned subsidiary is able to sell additional receivables up to the maximum permitted amount
under the program. Net cash proceeds of $300.0 million are available at any one time under the
securitization program.
Prior to September 1, 2010, the transactions in this program were accounted for as sales under
applicable accounting guidance. Effective September 1, 2010, the Company adopted new accounting
guidance that resulted in more stringent conditions for reporting the transfer of a financial asset
as a sale. As a result of the adoption of this new guidance, the accounts receivable transferred
under this program no longer qualified for sale treatment and as such were accounted for as secured
borrowings. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2011, this program was amended to again account
for the transfers of the applicable accounts receivable as sales. Under the amended program any
portion of the purchase price for the receivables which is not paid in cash upon the sale taking
place is recorded as a deferred purchase price receivable, which is paid by the conduits from
available cash as payments on the receivables are collected. The securitization program requires
compliance with several financial covenants including an interest coverage ratio and debt to EBITDA
ratio, as defined in the securitization agreements. The securitization agreement, as amended on
November 5, 2010, expires on November 4, 2011.
Net receivables sold under this program are excluded from trade accounts receivable on the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and are reflected as cash provided by operating activities on
the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The wholly-owned subsidiary is assessed (i) a
fee on the unused portion of the program of 0.50% per annum based on the average daily unused
aggregate receivables sold during the period
and (ii) a usage fee on the utilized portion of the program is equal to 0.95% per annum
(inclusive of the unused fee) on the average daily outstanding aggregate receivables sold during
the immediately preceding calendar month. The securitization conduits and the investors in the
conduits have no recourse to the Companys assets for failure of debtors to pay when due.
The Company continues servicing the receivables sold and in exchange receives a servicing fee.
Servicing fees recognized during the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2011 and 2010 were
not material and are included in other expense within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The Company does not record a servicing asset or liability as the Company estimates
the fee it receives in return for its obligation to service these receivables is at fair value.
The Company sold $1.4 billion and $4.3 billion of eligible trade accounts receivable during
the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2011, respectively. In exchange, the Company
received cash proceeds of $1.1 billion and $4.0 billion during the three months and nine months
ended May 31, 2011, respectively, and a net deferred purchase price receivable. At May 31, 2011,
the deferred purchase price receivable totaled approximately $280.1 million, which was recorded
initially at fair value as prepaid expenses
16
and other current assets on the Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets. The deferred purchase price receivable was valued using unobservable inputs (Level
3 inputs), primarily discounted cash flows, and due to its credit quality and short-term maturity
the fair value approximated book value.
The Company sold $1.1 billion and $3.6 billion of eligible trade accounts receivable during
the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2010, respectively. In exchange, the Company
received cash proceeds of $0.9 billion and $3.4 billion during the three months and nine months
ended May 31, 2010, respectively, and retained an interest in the receivables of approximately
$144.6 million at May 31, 2010.
The Company recognized pretax losses on the sales of receivables of approximately $0.8 million
and $2.7 million during the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2011 compared to $0.9
million and $2.9 million during the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2010, respectively,
which are recorded to other expense within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Prior to execution of the previously discussed amendment, the Company recognized interest expense
of approximately $0.5 million during the first quarter of fiscal year 2011 associated with the
secured borrowings.
b. Foreign Asset-Backed Securitization Program
In connection with the foreign asset-backed securitization program, prior to May 11, 2011,
certain of the Companys foreign subsidiaries sold, on an ongoing basis, an undivided interest in
designated pools of trade accounts receivable to a special purpose entity, which in turn borrowed
up to $100.0 million from an unaffiliated financial institution and granted a security interest in
the accounts receivable as collateral for the borrowings. The securitization program was accounted
for as a borrowing. The loan balance was calculated based on the terms of the securitization
program agreements.
Effective May 11, 2011, the securitization program was amended to provide for the sale of 100%
of the designated trade accounts receivable of the Companys foreign subsidiaries to the special
purpose entity which in turn sells 100% of the receivables to an unaffiliated financial
institution. Net cash proceeds of $200.0 million are available at any one time under the
securitization program. As a result of the amendment, transfers of the receivables to the
unaffiliated financial institution are accounted for as sales. Under the amended program, any
portion of the purchase price for the receivables which is not paid in cash to the special purpose
entity upon the sale taking place is recorded as a deferred purchase price receivable, which is
paid to the special purpose entity as payments on the receivables are collected. The foreign-asset
backed securitization program requires compliance with several covenants including limitations on
certain corporate actions such as mergers and consolidations. The securitization agreement, as
amended on May 11, 2011, expires on May 10, 2012.
As the Company has the power to direct the activities of the special purpose entity and the
obligation to absorb the majority of the expected losses or the right to receive benefits from the
transfer of trade accounts receivable into the special purpose entity it is deemed the primary
beneficiary. Accordingly, the Company consolidates the special purpose entity (which was also the
case prior to the amendment on May 11, 2011).
Net receivables sold under this program are excluded from trade accounts receivable on the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and are reflected as cash provided by operating activities on
the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The special purpose entity is assessed (i) a
fee in an amount equal to 0.45% per annum multiplied by the maximum aggregate invested amount
during the period and (ii) a fee on the average amount outstanding under the program during the
period multiplied by the applicable rate in effect for the period (i.e. LIBOR for U.S. dollars and
EURIBOR for euros) plus a 0.45% per annum margin. The unaffiliated financial institution has no
recourse to the Companys assets for failure of debtors to pay when due.
The Company continues servicing the receivables in the program and in exchange receives a
servicing fee. Servicing fees recognized during the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2011
and 2010 were not material and are included in interest expense up through the amendment date of
May 11, 2011 and in other expense subsequent to May 11, 2011 within the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations. The Company does not record a servicing asset or liability on the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as the Company estimates the fee it receives in return for
its obligation to service these receivables is at fair value.
Subsequent to the amendment on May 11, 2011 through May 31, 2011, the Company sold (including
amounts transferred into the program on the amendment date) $352.8 million of eligible trade
accounts receivable. In exchange, the Company received cash proceeds of $258.9 million during the
same period, and a net deferred purchase price receivable. At May 31, 2011, the deferred purchase
price receivable totaled approximately $93.9 million, which was recorded initially at fair value as
prepaid expenses and other current assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The
deferred purchase price receivable was valued using unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs), primarily
discounted cash flows, and due to its credit quality and short-term maturity the fair value
approximated book value. The resulting losses on the sales of the receivables subsequent to the
amendment on May 11, 2011 through May 31, 2011 were $0.5 million and were recorded to other expense
within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
17
Prior to execution of the previously
discussed amendment, the Company recognized interest expense of approximately $0.3 million and $0.9
million for the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2011 associated with the secured
borrowings.
At May 31, 2010, the Company had $58.1 million of secured borrowings outstanding under the
program. In addition, the Company incurred interest expense of $0.4 million and $1.8 million
recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations during the three months and nine
months ended May 31, 2010.
c. Trade Accounts Receivable Factoring Agreement
In connection with a factoring agreement, the Company transfers ownership of eligible trade
accounts receivable of a foreign subsidiary without recourse to a third party purchaser in exchange
for cash. The factoring of trade accounts receivable under this agreement is accounted for as a
sale. Proceeds on the transfer reflect the face value of the account less a discount. The discount
is recorded as a loss to other expense within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
in the period of the sale. In April 2011, the factoring agreement was extended through September
30, 2011, at which time it is expected to automatically renew for an additional six-month period.
The receivables sold pursuant to this factoring agreement are excluded from trade accounts
receivable on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and are reflected as cash provided by
operating activities on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The Company continues
to service, administer and collect the receivables sold under this program. Servicing fees
recognized during the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2011 and 2010 were not material,
and were recorded to other expense within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The
Company does not record a servicing asset or liability on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
as the Company estimates the fee it receives in return for its obligation to service these
receivables is at fair value. The third party purchaser has no recourse to the Companys assets
for failure of debtors to pay when due.
The Company sold $14.4 million and $50.6 million of trade accounts receivable during the three
months and nine months ended May 31, 2011, respectively, and in exchange, received cash proceeds of
$14.3 million and $50.5 million, respectively. The resulting losses on the sales of trade accounts
receivables sold under this factoring agreement for the three months and nine months ended May 31,
2011 were not material, and were recorded to other expense within the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations. The Company sold $20.8 million and $68.9 million of trade accounts during
the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2010, respectively, and in exchange, received cash
proceeds of $20.8 million and $68.8 million, respectively. The resulting losses on the sales
of trade accounts receivables sold under this factoring agreement for the three months and
nine months ended May 31, 2010 were not material, and were recorded to other expense within the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
d. Trade Accounts Receivable Sale Programs
In fiscal year 2010, the Company entered into two separate uncommitted accounts
receivable sale agreements with banks which originally allowed the Company and certain of its
subsidiaries to elect to sell and the banks to elect to purchase at a discount, on an ongoing
basis, up to a maximum of $150.0 million and $75.0 million of specific trade accounts receivable at
any one time. The sale programs have been amended to increase the facility limits from $150.0
million to $200.0 million and from $75.0 million to $175.0 million of specific trade accounts
receivable at any one time. The programs are accounted for as sales. Net receivables sold under the
programs are excluded from trade accounts receivable on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
and are reflected as cash provided by operating activities on the Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Cash Flows. The $200.0 million sale program was amended on May 27, 2011. The terms of the
agreement were amended such that the program no longer has a defined termination date and either
party can elect to cancel the agreement at any time with notification. The $175.0 million sale
program expires on August 24, 2011. The Company continues servicing the receivables in the program.
Servicing fees recognized during the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2011 and 2010 were
not material and are included in other expense within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The Company does not record a servicing asset or liability on the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets as the Company estimates the fee it receives in return for its
obligation to service these receivables is at fair value.
During the three and nine months ended May 31, 2011, the Company sold $697.8 million and $1.8
billion of trade accounts receivable under these programs, respectively. In exchange, the Company
received cash proceeds of $697.3 million and $1.8 billion, respectively. The resulting losses on
the sales of trade accounts receivable for the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2011,
were not material and were recorded to other expense within the Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Operations. During the three and nine months ended May 31, 2010, the Company sold $43.5 million
of trade accounts receivable under these programs. In exchange, the Company received cash proceeds
of $43.5 million. The resulting losses on the sales of trade accounts receivable for the three
months and nine months ended May 31, 2010, were not material and were recorded to other expense
within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Note 9. Retirement Benefits
18
The Company sponsors defined benefit pension plans in several countries in which it operates.
The pension obligations relate primarily to the following: (a) a funded retirement plan in the
United Kingdom, which provides benefits based on average employee earnings over a three-year
service period preceding retirement and (b) primarily unfunded retirement plans mainly in Austria,
France, Germany, Japan, Poland, Taiwan and The Netherlands and which provide benefits based upon
years of service and compensation at retirement.
There are no domestic pension or postretirement benefit plans maintained by the Company.
The components of net periodic benefit cost (gain) for the Companys pension plans are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
376 |
|
|
$ |
364 |
|
|
$ |
1,136 |
|
|
$ |
1,152 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
1,441 |
|
|
|
1,353 |
|
|
|
4,259 |
|
|
|
4,338 |
|
Expected long-term return on plan assets |
|
|
(1,118 |
) |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
(3,315 |
) |
|
|
(3,212 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(87 |
) |
Recognized actuarial loss |
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
932 |
|
Curtailment gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,874 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost (gain) |
|
$ |
1,140 |
|
|
$ |
983 |
|
|
$ |
1,640 |
|
|
$ |
3,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the nine months ended May 31, 2011, the Company made contributions of
approximately $2.8 million to its defined benefit pension plans. The Company presently anticipates
total fiscal year 2011 contributions to approximate $3.6 million to $4.2 million.
Note 10. Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt
Notes payable and long-term debt outstanding at May 31, 2011 and August 31, 2010 are
summarized below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
7.750% Senior Notes due 2016 |
|
$ |
303,072 |
|
|
$ |
301,782 |
|
8.250% Senior Notes due 2018 |
|
|
397,426 |
|
|
|
397,140 |
|
5.625% Senior Notes due 2020 (a) |
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under credit facilities |
|
|
78,000 |
|
|
|
73,750 |
|
Borrowings under loans (b) |
|
|
2,449 |
|
|
|
342,380 |
|
Securitization program obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,436 |
|
Miscellaneous borrowings |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Fair value adjustment (c) |
|
|
6,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total notes payable and long-term debt |
|
|
1,187,644 |
|
|
$ |
1,186,496 |
|
Less current installments of notes payable and long-term debt |
|
|
80,449 |
|
|
|
167,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and long-term debt, less current installments |
|
$ |
1,107,195 |
|
|
$ |
1,018,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $400.0 million of 5.625% senior unsecured notes (the 5.625% Senior Notes), $312.0
million of 7.750% senior unsecured notes (the 7.750% Senior Notes) and $400.0 million of 8.250%
senior unsecured notes (the 8.250% Senior Notes) outstanding are carried at the principal amount
of each note, less any unamortized discount. The estimated fair value of these senior notes was
approximately $401.0 million, $352.6 million and $464.0 million, respectively, at May 31, 2011. The
fair value estimates are based upon observable market data (Level 2 criteria).
a. 5.625% Senior Notes Offering
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2011, the Company issued the ten-year publicly
registered 5.625% Senior Notes at par. The net proceeds from the offering of $400.0 million were
used to fully repay the term portion of its credit facility dated as of July 19, 2007 and partially
repay amounts outstanding under the Companys foreign asset-backed securitization program. The
5.625% Senior Notes mature on December 15, 2020. Interest on the 5.625% Senior Notes is payable
semiannually on June 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning on June 15, 2011. The 5.625% Senior
Notes are the Companys senior unsecured obligations and rank equally
19
with all other existing and
future senior unsecured debt obligations. The Company is subject to covenants such as limitations
on its and/or its subsidiaries ability to: consolidate or merge with, or convey, transfer or lease
all or substantially all of the Companys assets to, another person; create certain liens; enter
into sale and leaseback transactions; create, incur, issue, assume or guarantee any funded debt
(which only applies to the Companys restricted subsidiaries); and guarantee any of the Companys
indebtedness (which only applies to the Companys subsidiaries). The Company is also subject to a
covenant requiring its repurchase of the 5.625% Senior Notes upon a change of control repurchase
event.
b. Amended and Restated Credit Facility
On December 7, 2010, the Company amended and restated its five-year $800.0 million revolving
credit facility (the Amended and Restated Credit Facility). The Amended and Restated Credit
Facility provides for a
revolving credit in the amount of $1.0 billion, subject to potential uncommitted increases up
to $1.3 billion, and expires on December 7, 2015. Interest and fees on the Amended and Restated
Credit Facility advances are based on the Companys non-credit enhanced long-term senior unsecured
debt rating as determined by S&P and Moodys. Interest is charged at a rate equal to either 0.40%
to 1.50% above the base rate or 1.40% to 2.50% above the Eurocurrency rate, where the base rate
represents the greatest of Citibank, N.A.s prime rate, 0.50% above the federal funds rate or 1.0%
above one-month LIBOR, and the Eurocurrency rate represents the adjusted London Interbank Offered
Rate for the applicable interest period, each as more fully described in the Agreement. Fees
include a facility fee based on the revolving credit commitments of the lenders and a letter of
credit fee based on the amount of outstanding letters of credit. The Company, along with its
subsidiaries, are subject to the following financial covenants: (1) a maximum ratio of (a) Debt (as
defined in the credit agreement) to (b) Consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the credit agreement)
and (2) a minimum ratio of (a) Consolidated EBITDA to (b) interest payable on, and amortization of
debt discount in respect of, debt and loss on sales of trade accounts receivables pursuant to our
securitization program. In addition, the Company is subject to other covenants, such as: limitation
upon liens; limitation upon mergers, etc.; limitation upon accounting changes; limitation upon
subsidiary debt; limitation upon sales, etc. of assets; limitation upon changes in nature of
business; payment restrictions affecting subsidiaries; compliance with laws, etc.; payment of
taxes, etc.; maintenance of insurance; preservation of corporate existence, etc.; visitation
rights; keeping of books; maintenance of properties, etc.; transactions with affiliates; and
reporting requirements.
c. Fair Value Adjustment
This amount represents the fair value hedge accounting adjustment related to the 7.750% Senior
Notes. For further discussion of the Companys fair value hedges, see Note 11 Derivative
Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Note 11. Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company is directly and indirectly affected by changes in certain market conditions.
These changes in market conditions may adversely impact the Companys financial performance and are
referred to as market risks. The Company, where deemed appropriate, uses derivatives as a risk
management tool to mitigate the potential impact of certain market risks. The primary market risks
managed by the Company through the use of derivatives instruments are foreign currency fluctuation
risk and interest rate risk.
All derivative instruments are recorded gross on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at
their respective fair values. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative
instrument depends on the intended use and designation of the derivative instrument. For derivative
instruments that are designated and qualify as a fair value hedge, the gain or loss on the
derivative and the offsetting gain or loss on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are
recognized in current earnings. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a
cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is
initially reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI), net of tax,
and is subsequently reclassified into the line item within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations in which the hedged items are recorded in the same period in which the hedged item
affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss is recognized immediately in current
earnings. For derivative instruments that are not designated as hedging instruments, gains and
losses from changes in fair values are recognized currently in earnings.
For derivatives accounted for as hedging instruments, the Company formally designates and
documents, at inception, the financial instruments as a hedge of a specific underlying exposure,
the risk management objective and the strategy for undertaking the hedge transaction. In addition,
the Company formally assesses, both at inception and at least quarterly thereafter, whether the
financial instruments used in hedging transactions are effective at offsetting changes in the cash
flows on the related underlying exposures.
a. Foreign Currency Risk Management
20
Forward contracts are put in place to manage the foreign currency risk associated with various
commitments arising from trade accounts receivable, trade accounts payable and fixed purchase
obligations. A hedging
relationship existed that related to certain anticipated foreign currency denominated revenues and
expenses, with an aggregate notional amount outstanding of $176.0 million and $67.1 million at May
31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The related forward foreign exchange contracts have been
designated as hedging instruments and are accounted for as cash flow hedges. The forward foreign
exchange contract transactions will effectively lock in the value of anticipated foreign currency
denominated revenues and expenses against foreign currency fluctuations. The anticipated foreign
currency denominated revenues and expenses being hedged are expected to occur between June 1, 2011
and April 30, 2012.
In addition to derivatives that are designated and qualify for hedge accounting, the Company
also enters into forward contracts to economically hedge transactional exposure associated with
commitments arising from trade accounts receivable, trade accounts payable, fixed purchase
obligations and intercompany transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional
currency of the respective operating entity. The aggregate notional amount of these outstanding
contracts at May 31, 2011 and 2010 was $686.9 million and $320.8 million, respectively.
The following table presents the Companys assets and liabilities related to forward foreign
exchange contracts measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of May 31, 2011, aggregated by
the level in the fair-value hierarchy within which those measurements fall (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,871 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,724 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,724 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,147 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys forward foreign exchange contracts are measured on a recurring basis
at fair value, based on foreign currency spot rates and forward rates quoted by banks or foreign
currency dealers.
The following table presents the fair value of the Companys derivative instruments located on
the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets utilized for foreign currency risk management purposes at
May 31, 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments |
|
|
At May 31, 2011 |
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
Fair |
|
Balance Sheet |
|
Fair |
|
|
Location |
|
Value |
|
Location |
|
Value |
Derivatives designated as hedging
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
3,571 |
|
|
Accrued expense |
|
$ |
93 |
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
6,300 |
|
|
Accrued expense |
|
$ |
4,631 |
|
The following table presents the fair value of the Companys derivative instruments located on
the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets utilized for foreign currency risk management purposes at
August 31, 2010 (in thousands):
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments |
|
|
At August 31, 2010 |
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
Fair |
|
Balance Sheet |
|
Fair |
|
|
Location |
|
Value |
|
Location |
|
Value |
Derivatives designated as hedging
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
669 |
|
|
Accrued expense |
|
$ |
1,046 |
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
4,814 |
|
|
Accrued expense |
|
$ |
3,268 |
|
The following table presents the impact that changes in fair value of derivatives utilized for
foreign currency risk management purposes and designated as hedging instruments had on AOCI and
earnings during the nine months ended May 31, 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain |
|
(Loss) Recognized in |
|
(Loss) Recognized in |
Derivatives in Cash |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
Location of Gain (Loss) |
|
(Loss) |
|
Income on Derivative |
|
Income on Derivative |
Flow Hedging |
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
Reclassified from |
|
Reclassified from |
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
(Ineffective Portion |
Relationship for the |
|
in OCI on |
|
AOCI |
|
AOCI |
|
and Amount Excluded |
|
and Amount Excluded |
Nine Months Ended |
|
Derivative |
|
into Income |
|
into Income |
|
from Effectiveness |
|
from Effectiveness |
May 31, 2011 |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
Testing) |
|
Testing) |
Forward
foreign exchange
contracts |
|
$ |
1,624 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,506 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
344 |
|
Forward foreign
exchange contracts |
|
$ |
4,212 |
|
|
Cost of revenue |
|
$ |
1,423 |
|
|
Cost of revenue |
|
$ |
345 |
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts |
|
$ |
1,033 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
482 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
200 |
|
The following table presents the impact that changes in fair value of derivatives utilized for
foreign currency risk management purposes and designated as hedging instruments had on AOCI and
earnings during the nine months ended May 31, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain |
|
(Loss) Recognized in |
|
(Loss) Recognized in |
Derivatives in Cash |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
Location of Gain (Loss) |
|
(Loss) |
|
Income on Derivative |
|
Income on Derivative |
Flow Hedging |
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
Reclassified from |
|
Reclassified from |
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
(Ineffective Portion |
Relationship for |
|
in OCI on |
|
AOCI |
|
AOCI |
|
and Amount Excluded |
|
and Amount Excluded |
the Nine Months |
|
Derivative |
|
into Income |
|
into Income |
|
from Effectiveness |
|
from Effectiveness |
Ended May 31, 2010 |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
Testing) |
|
Testing) |
Forward
foreign exchange
contracts |
|
$ |
(11,484 |
) |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
(11,484 |
) |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
42 |
|
Forward foreign
exchange contracts |
|
$ |
9,635 |
|
|
Cost of revenue |
|
$ |
11,498 |
|
|
Cost of revenue |
|
$ |
2,437 |
|
Forward foreign
exchange contracts |
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
29 |
|
22
As of May 31, 2011, the Company estimates that it will reclassify into earnings during the
next 12 months existing gains related to foreign currency risk management hedging arrangements of
approximately $2.9 million from the amounts recorded in AOCI as the anticipated cash flows occur.
The following table presents the impact that changes in fair value of derivatives utilized for
foreign currency risk management purposes and not designated as hedging instruments had on earnings
during the nine months ended May 31, 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in |
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in |
|
Income on Derivative for the Nine months |
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
Income on Derivative |
|
ended May 31, 2011 |
Forward foreign exchange contracts |
|
Cost of revenue |
|
$ |
(2,483 |
) |
b. Interest Rate Risk Management
The Company periodically enters into interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risk
associated with the Companys borrowings.
Fair Value Hedges
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2011, the Company entered into a series of interest
rate swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $200.0 million designated as fair value hedges of a
portion of the Companys 7.750% Senior Notes. Under these interest rate swaps, the Company receives
fixed rate interest payments and pays interest at a variable rate based on LIBOR plus a spread. The
effect of these swaps is to convert fixed rate interest expense on a portion of the 7.750% Senior
Notes to floating rate interest expense. Gains and losses related to changes in the fair value of
the interest rate swaps are recorded to interest expense and offset changes in the fair value of
the hedged portion of the underlying 7.750% Senior Notes. The fair value of the interest rate
swaps, based on observable market data (Level 2), was $6.7 million as of May 31, 2011 and was
recorded to other assets on the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of May 31,
2010, the Company had not entered into these interest rate swaps so there were no amounts
outstanding.
The gains (losses) on the interest rate swaps and the underlying 7.750% Senior Notes recorded
to interest expense within the Companys Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations were as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain/(Loss) for the |
|
Gain/(Loss) for the |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
May 31, |
|
May 31, |
|
May 31, |
|
May 31, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
$ |
6,111 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,695 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
7.750% Senior Notes |
|
$ |
(6,111 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(6,695 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Cash Flow Hedges
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007, the Company entered into forward interest rate
swap transactions to hedge the fixed interest rate payments for an anticipated debt issuance, which
was the issuance of the 8.250% Senior Notes. The swaps were accounted for as a cash flow hedge and
had a notional amount of $400.0 million. Concurrently with the pricing of the 8.250% Senior Notes,
the Company settled the swaps by its payment of $43.1 million. The ineffective portion of the swaps
was immediately recorded to interest expense within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The effective portion of the swaps is recorded on the Companys Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets as a component of AOCI and is being amortized to interest expense within the
Companys Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations over the life of the 8.250% Senior Notes,
which is through March 15, 2018.
The following table presents the impact that changes in the fair value of the derivative
utilized for interest rate risk management and designated as a hedging instrument had on AOCI and
earnings for the nine months ended May 31, 2011 (in thousands):
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain or |
|
Amount of Gain or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain |
|
(Loss) Recognized in |
|
(Loss) Recognized in |
|
|
Amount of Gain |
|
Location of Gain (Loss) |
|
or (Loss) |
|
Income on Derivative |
|
Income on Derivative |
|
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
Reclassified from |
|
Reclassified from |
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
(Ineffective Portion |
Derivatives in Cash Flow |
|
in OCI on |
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
and Amount Excluded |
|
and Amount Excluded |
Hedging Relationship for the Nine |
|
Derivative |
|
into Income |
|
into Income |
|
from Effectiveness |
|
from Effectiveness |
Months Ended May 31, 2011 |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
Testing) |
|
Testing) |
Interest rate swap |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(2,963 |
) |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
|
|
The following table presents the impact that changes in the fair value of the derivative
utilized for interest rate risk management and designated as a hedging instrument had on AOCI and
earnings for the nine months ended May 31, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain or |
|
Amount of Gain or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain |
|
(Loss) Recognized in |
|
(Loss) Recognized in |
|
|
Amount of Gain |
|
Location of Gain (Loss) |
|
or (Loss) |
|
Income on Derivative |
|
Income on Derivative |
|
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
Reclassified from |
|
Reclassified from |
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
(Ineffective Portion |
Derivatives in Cash Flow |
|
in OCI on |
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
and Amount Excluded |
|
and Amount Excluded |
Hedging Relationship for the Nine |
|
Derivative |
|
into Income |
|
into Income |
|
from Effectiveness |
|
from Effectiveness |
Months Ended May 31, 2010 |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
Testing) |
|
Testing) |
Interest rate swap |
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(3,178 |
) |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
|
|
As of May 31, 2011, the Company estimates that it will reclassify into earnings during the
next 12 months existing losses related to interest rate risk management hedging arrangements of
approximately $4.0 million from the amounts recorded in AOCI as the anticipated cash flows occur.
The following table presents the changes related to cash flow hedges included in AOCI net of
tax for the nine months ended May 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
May 31, 2011 |
|
Accumulated comprehensive loss, August 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
(16,086 |
) |
Net gain for the period |
|
|
6,869 |
|
Net gain transferred to earnings |
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accumulated comprehensive loss, May 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
(9,508 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months |
|
|
|
ended May 31, 2010 |
|
Accumulated comprehensive loss, August 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
(18,861 |
) |
Net loss for the period |
|
|
(1,877 |
) |
Net loss transferred to earnings |
|
|
3,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated comprehensive loss, May 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
(17,560 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Note 12. Income Taxes
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) completed its field examination of the Companys tax
returns for the fiscal years 2003 through 2005 and issued a Revenue Agents Report (RAR) on April
30, 2010 proposing adjustments primarily related to the IRS contentions that (1) certain corporate
expenses relate to services provided to foreign affiliates and therefore must be charged to those
affiliates, and (2) valuable intangible property was transferred to certain foreign affiliates
without charge. If the IRS ultimately prevails in its positions, the Companys income tax payment
due for the fiscal years 2003 through 2005 would be approximately an additional $69.3 million
before utilization of any tax attributes arising in periods subsequent to fiscal year 2005. In
addition, the IRS will likely make similar claims in future audits with respect to these types of
transactions (at this time, determination of the additional income tax due for these later years is
not practicable). Also, the IRS has proposed interest and penalties on the Company with respect to
fiscal years 2003 through 2005, and the Company anticipates the IRS may seek to impose interest and
penalties in subsequent years with respect to the same types of issues.
The Company disagrees with the proposed adjustments and is vigorously contesting this matter
through applicable IRS and judicial procedures, as appropriate. As the final resolution of the
proposed adjustments remains uncertain, the Company continues to provide for the uncertain tax
position based on the more likely than not standards. Accordingly, the Company did not record any
significant additional tax liabilities related to this RAR on the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets for the nine months ended May
24
31, 2011. While the resolution of the issues may result in tax
liabilities, interest and penalties, which are significantly higher than the amounts provided
for this matter, management currently believes that the resolution will not have a material effect
on the Companys financial position or liquidity. Despite this belief, an unfavorable resolution,
particularly if the IRS successfully asserts similar claims for later years, could have a material
effect on the Companys results of operations and financial condition (particularly during the
quarter in which any adjustment is recorded or any tax is due or paid).
Note 13. Loss on Disposal of Subsidiaries
a. Jabil Circuit Automotive, SAS
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, the Company sold its subsidiary, Jabil
Circuit Automotive, SAS, an automotive electronics manufacturing subsidiary located in Western
Europe to an unrelated third party. As a result of this sale, the Company recorded a loss on
disposition of $15.7 million during the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, which included
transaction-related costs of approximately $4.2 million. These costs are recorded to loss on
disposal of subsidiaries within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, which is a
component of operating income. Jabil Circuit Automotive had net revenue and an operating loss of
$15.5 million and $1.4 million, respectively from the beginning of the 2010 fiscal year through the
date of disposition.
b. French and Italian Subsidiaries
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010, the Company sold F-I Holding Company,
which directly or indirectly wholly owns Competence France Holdings SAS, a French entity which
wholly owns Competence France SAS, and Competence EMEA S.r.l., an Italian entity which wholly owns
Competence Italia S.r.l. (Competence France Holdings SAS, Competence France SAS, Competence EMEA
S.r.l. and Competence Italia S.r.l. are collectively referred to as the Competence Sites
herein), to an unrelated third party. Divested operations, inclusive of four sites and
approximately 1,500 employees, had net revenues and an operating loss of $298.6 million and $39.6
million, respectively, from the beginning of the 2010 fiscal year through the date of disposition.
In connection with this transaction, the Company provided an aggregate $25.0 million
working capital loan to the disposed operations and agreed to provide for the aggregate potential
reimbursement of up to $10.0 million in restructuring costs dependent upon the occurrence of
certain future events. The working capital loan bears interest on a quarterly basis at LIBOR plus
500 basis points and is repayable over approximately 44 months dependent upon the achievement of
certain specified quarterly financial results of the disposed operations, which if not met, would
result in the forgiveness of all or a portion of the loan. Accordingly, dependent on the occurrence
of such future events, the Company could have incurred up to an additional $28.5 million of
charges. As a result of this sale, the Company recorded a loss on disposition of $8.9 million
during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010, which included transaction-related costs of $1.7
million and a charge of $6.5 million in order to record the working capital loan at its respective
fair value at August 31, 2010 based upon a discounted cash flow analysis (Level 3). These costs
were recorded to loss on disposal of subsidiaries within the Consolidated Statements of Operations
during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010, which is a component of operating income.
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2011, the Company recorded an additional loss on
disposal of subsidiaries of $18.5 million within the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
to fully write off the remaining balance of the working capital loan as it was deemed no longer
collectible by the Company. In addition, the Company recorded a charge of $5.4 million to loss on
disposal of subsidiaries within the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations during the
second quarter of fiscal year 2011, as it was determined that a purchase price related receivable
that was due from the third party purchaser was no longer collectible. Refer to Note 14
Business Acquisitions for further discussion on the subsequent acquisition of the French and
Italian operations.
Note 14. Business Acquisitions
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2011, the Company completed its acquisition of F-I
Holding Company, which directly or indirectly wholly owns the Competence Sites. The Competence
Sites were former
operations of the Company and were previously disposed of during the fourth quarter of fiscal
year 2010. Refer to Note 13 Loss on Disposal of Subsidiaries for further discussion of the
previous disposition. In order to reestablish viable operations, including the preservation of the
Companys relationship with certain global customers that the Company continued to serve outside of
its former French and Italian operations and jobs of former employees, the Company acquired the
entities owning the Competence Sites following multiple breaches by the third party purchaser. The
acquisition added approximately 1,500 employees to the Company.
In exchange for cash of approximately $0.5 million and certain mutual conditional
releases, the Company acquired a 100% equity interest in the Competence Sites. Simultaneously,
with this transaction, the Company recorded a settlement of pre-existing receivables and other
relationships with a fair value of $22.3 million that were outstanding at the time of acquisition.
25
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2011, immediately prior to the acquisition of the
Competence Sites, the Company recognized a charge of $12.7 million in order to record $35.0 million
in receivables and other relationships with the Competence Sites at their respective fair values.
This charge is included in settlement of receivables and related charges within the Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the nine months ended May 31, 2011. The fair values of
these receivables and other obligations were determined based on the probability evaluation of
multiple scenarios under which the Competence Sites could settle these liabilities.
Pursuant to the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations, the Company has
recognized acquisition costs and other related charges of $0.9 million to settlement of receivables
and related charges within the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations during the second
quarter of fiscal year 2011.
The acquisition of the Competence entities has been accounted for as a business combination
using the acquisition method. Assets acquired of $130.9 million and liabilities assumed of $108.1
million were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The excess of
purchase price over the tangible assets and assumed liabilities of $5.1 million, based on the
exchange rate on the date of acquisition, was recorded as goodwill. The preliminary allocation of
the purchase price was based upon a preliminary valuation of certain assets acquired and
liabilities assumed and the Companys estimates and assumptions are subject to change. The primary
areas of the preliminary purchase price allocation that are not yet finalized relate to the fair
value of certain tangible assets and liabilities acquired and residual goodwill. The Company
expects to continue to obtain information to assist in determining the fair value of the net assets
acquired at the acquisition date and to finalize the purchase price allocation in the fourth
quarter of fiscal year 2011.
Note 15. New Accounting Guidance
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the
FASB) issued new accounting guidance for revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. This
guidance impacts the determination of when the individual deliverables included in a
multiple-element arrangement may be treated as separate units of accounting. Additionally, this new
accounting guidance modifies the manner in which the transaction consideration is allocated across
the separately identified deliverables by no longer permitting the residual method of allocating
arrangement consideration. The new guidance was effective for the Company prospectively for revenue
arrangements entered into or materially modified beginning during the first quarter of fiscal year
2011. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Companys Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009, the FASB amended its guidance on accounting for
variable interest entities (VIE). The new accounting guidance resulted in a change in the
Companys accounting policy effective September 1, 2010. Among other things, the new guidance
requires a qualitative rather than a quantitative analysis to determine the primary beneficiary of
a VIE, requires continuous assessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a
VIE, enhances disclosures about an enterprises involvement with a VIE and amends certain guidance
for determining whether an entity is a VIE. Under the new guidance, a VIE must be consolidated if
the enterprise has both (a) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly
impact the entitys economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to
receive benefits from the VIE that could
potentially be significant to the VIE. The adoption of this guidance did not have a
significant impact on the Companys Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009, the FASB issued new accounting guidance on
accounting for transfers of financial assets. This new guidance became effective for the Company on
September 1, 2010. This guidance amends previous guidance by eliminating the concept of a
qualifying special-purpose entity, creating more stringent conditions for reporting a transfer of a
portion of a financial asset as a sale, clarifying other sale-accounting criteria and changing the
initial measurement of a transferors interest in transferred financial assets. Additionally, the
guidance requires extensive new disclosure regarding an entitys involvement in a transfer of
financial assets. As a result of the adoption of this new guidance, the accounts receivable
transferred under the asset-backed securitization program, prior to amendment on November 5, 2010,
no longer qualified for sale treatment and as such were accounted for as secured borrowings. During
the first quarter of fiscal year 2011, the program was amended to again be accounted for as a sale.
The amended program allows the Company to regularly sell a designated pool of trade accounts
receivable to a wholly-owned subsidiary, which in turn sells 100% of the eligible receivables to
conduits, administered by unaffiliated financial institutions. Refer to Note 8 Trade Accounts
Receivable Securitization and Sale Programs.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010, the FASB issued new disclosure guidance related
to the credit quality of financing receivables and the allowance for credit losses. This new
guidance became effective for the Company during the second quarter of fiscal year 2011. This
guidance requires companies to provide more information about the credit quality of their financing
receivables
26
in the disclosures to the financial statements including, but not limited to,
significant purchases and sales of financing receivables, aging information and credit quality
indicators. This accounting guidance did not have a significant impact on the Companys Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Note 16. Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated subsequent events that occurred through the date of the filing of
the Companys third quarter of fiscal year 2011 Form 10-Q. No significant events occurred
subsequent to the balance sheet date and prior to the filing date of this report that would have a
material impact on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
27
JABIL CIRCUIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
References in this report to the Company, Jabil, we, our, or us mean Jabil Circuit,
Inc. together with its subsidiaries, except where the context otherwise requires. This Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q contains certain statements that are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
Securities Act) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act) which are made in reliance upon the protections provided by such acts for forward-looking
statements. These forward-looking statements (such as when we describe what will, may, or
should occur, what we plan, intend, estimate, believe, expect or anticipate will
occur, and other similar statements) include, but are not limited to, statements regarding future
sales and operating results, future prospects, anticipated benefits of proposed (or future)
acquisitions, dispositions and new facilities, growth, the capabilities and capacities of business
operations, any financial or other guidance and all statements that are not based on historical
fact, but rather reflect our current expectations concerning future results and events. We make
certain assumptions when making forward-looking statements, any of which could prove inaccurate,
including, but not limited to, statements about our future operating results and business plans.
Therefore, we can give no assurance that the results implied by these forward-looking statements
will be realized. Furthermore, the inclusion of forward-looking information should not be regarded
as a representation by the Company or any other person that future events, plans or expectations
contemplated by the Company will be achieved. The ultimate correctness of these forward-looking
statements is dependent upon a number of known and unknown risks and events, and is subject to
various uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or
achievements to be different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or
implied by these statements. The following important factors, among others, could affect future
results and events, causing those results and events to differ materially from those expressed or
implied in our forward-looking statements:
|
|
|
business conditions and growth or declines in our customers industries, the electronic manufacturing services
industry and the general economy; |
|
|
|
|
variability of our operating results; |
|
|
|
|
our dependence on a limited number of major customers; |
|
|
|
|
availability of components; |
|
|
|
|
our dependence on certain industries; |
|
|
|
|
our production levels are subject to the variability of customer requirements, including seasonal influences on the
demand for certain end products; |
|
|
|
|
our substantial international operations, and the resulting risks related to our operating internationally; |
|
|
|
|
the ongoing situation in Japan, as a result of the recent earthquake and tsunami, and its effects on our Japanese
facility, supply chain, shipping costs, customers and suppliers; |
|
|
|
|
the potential consolidation of our customer base, and the potential movement by some of our customers of a portion of
their manufacturing from us in order to more fully utilize their excess internal manufacturing capacity; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully negotiate definitive agreements and consummate dispositions and acquisitions, and to
integrate operations following the consummation of acquisitions; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to take advantage of our past, current and possible future restructuring efforts to improve utilization
and realize savings and whether any such activity will adversely affect our cost structure, our ability to service
customers and our labor relations; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to maintain our engineering, technological and manufacturing process expertise; |
|
|
|
|
other economic, business and competitive factors affecting our customers, our industry and our business generally; and |
|
|
|
|
other factors that we may not have currently identified or quantified. |
For a further list and description of various risks, relevant factors and uncertainties
that could cause future results or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in
our forward-looking statements, see the Risk Factors and Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations sections contained in this document, as well as our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010, any subsequent reports on
Form 10-Q and Form 8-K and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Given these
risks and uncertainties, the reader should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements.
28
All forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are made
only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and we do not undertake any obligation
to publicly update or correct any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances
that subsequently occur, or of which we hereafter become aware. You should read this document and
the documents that we incorporate by reference into this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q completely
and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we
expect. We may not update these forward-looking statements, even if our situation changes in the
future. All forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified by these
cautionary statements.
|
|
|
Item 2: |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Overview
We are one of the leading providers of worldwide electronic manufacturing services and
solutions. We provide comprehensive electronics design, production and product management services
to companies in the aerospace, automotive, computing, consumer, defense, industrial,
instrumentation, medical, networking, peripherals, solar, storage and telecommunications
industries. We serve our customers primarily with dedicated business units that combine highly
automated, continuous flow manufacturing with advanced electronic design and design for
manufacturability. We currently depend upon a relatively small number of customers for a
significant percentage of our revenue, net of estimated return costs (net revenue). Based on net
revenue, for the nine months ended May 31, 2011 our largest customers currently include Agilent
Technologies, Apple Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Ericsson, General Electric Company, Hewlett-Packard
Company, International Business Machines Corporation, NetApp, Inc., Pace plc and Research in Motion
Limited. For the nine months ended May 31, 2011, we had net revenues of approximately $12.2 billion
and net income attributable to Jabil Circuit, Inc. of approximately $266.8 million.
We offer our customers comprehensive electronics design, production and product management
services that are responsive to their manufacturing and supply chain management needs. Our business
units are capable of providing our customers with varying combinations of the following services:
|
|
|
integrated design and engineering; |
|
|
|
|
component selection, sourcing and procurement; |
|
|
|
|
automated assembly; |
|
|
|
|
design and implementation of product testing; |
|
|
|
|
parallel global production; |
|
|
|
|
enclosure services; |
|
|
|
|
systems assembly, direct order fulfillment and configure to order; and |
|
|
|
|
aftermarket services. |
We currently conduct our operations in facilities that are located in Austria, Belgium,
Brazil, China, England, France, Germany, Hungary, India, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico,
The Netherlands, Poland, Russia, Scotland, Singapore, Taiwan, Turkey, Ukraine, the U.S. and
Vietnam. Our global manufacturing production sites allow customers to manufacture products
simultaneously in the optimal locations for their products. Our services allow customers to improve
supply-chain management, reduce inventory obsolescence, lower transportation costs and reduce
product fulfillment time. We have identified our global presence as a key to assessing our business
opportunities.
On September 1, 2010, we reorganized our business into the following three segments:
Diversified Manufacturing Services (DMS), Enterprise & Infrastructure (E&I) and High Velocity
Systems (HVS). Our DMS segment is composed of dedicated resources to manage higher complexity
global products in regulated industries and bring materials and process technologies including
design and aftermarket services to our global customers. Our E&I and HVS segments offer integrated
global supply chain solutions designed to provide cost effective solutions for our customers. Our
E&I segment is focused on our customers primarily in the computing, storage, networking and
telecommunication sectors. Our HVS segment is focused on the particular needs of the consumer
products industry, including mobility, display, set-top boxes and peripheral products such as
printers and point of sale terminals.
The industry in which we operate is composed of companies that provide a range of
manufacturing and design services to companies that utilize electronics components. The industry
experienced rapid change and growth through the 1990s as an increasing number of companies chose to
outsource an increasing portion, and, in some cases, all of their manufacturing requirements. In
mid-2001, the industrys revenue declined as a result of significant cut-backs in customer
production requirements, which was consistent with the overall downturn in the technology sector at
the time. In response to this downturn in the technology sector, we implemented restructuring
programs to reduce our cost structure and further align our manufacturing capacity with the
geographic production
29
demands of our customers. Industry revenues generally began to stabilize in
2003 and companies began to turn more to outsourcing versus internal manufacturing. In addition,
the number of industries serviced, as well as the market penetration in certain industries, by
electronic manufacturing service providers has increased over the past several years. In mid-2008,
the industrys revenue declined when a deteriorating macro-economic environment resulted in
illiquidity in the overall credit markets and a significant economic downturn in the North
American, European and Asian markets. In response to this downturn, we implemented additional
restructuring programs to reduce our cost structure and further align our manufacturing capacity
with the geographic production demands of our customers.
Though significant uncertainty remains regarding the extent and timing of the economic
recovery, we continue to see signs of stabilization as the overall credit markets have
significantly improved and it appears that the global economic stimulus programs put in place are
having a positive impact, particularly in China. We will continue to monitor the current economic
environment and its potential impact on both the customers that we serve as well as our end-markets
and closely manage our costs and capital resources so that we can respond appropriately as
circumstances continue to change. We will also continue to monitor the ongoing situation in Japan,
as a result of the recent earthquake and tsunami, and its effects on our Japanese facility, supply
chain, shipping costs, customers and suppliers.
Summary of Results
Net revenues for the third quarter of fiscal year 2011 increased approximately 22.3% to $4.2
billion compared to $3.5 billion for the same period of fiscal year 2010. These increases are
primarily due to increased revenue from certain of our existing customers, including new program
wins with these customers, as certain of our customers confidence in their markets strengthen and
their end-customers demand levels increase.
The following table sets forth, for the three month and nine month periods indicated, certain
key operating results and other financial information (in thousands, except per share data).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
May 31, |
|
May 31, |
|
May 31, |
|
May 31, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Net revenue |
|
$ |
4,227,688 |
|
|
$ |
3,455,578 |
|
|
$ |
12,238,532 |
|
|
$ |
9,548,478 |
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
318,376 |
|
|
$ |
262,114 |
|
|
$ |
925,367 |
|
|
$ |
716,636 |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
152,533 |
|
|
$ |
96,533 |
|
|
$ |
413,174 |
|
|
$ |
224,576 |
|
Net income attributable to Jabil Circuit, Inc. |
|
$ |
104,695 |
|
|
$ |
52,031 |
|
|
$ |
266,775 |
|
|
$ |
110,149 |
|
Income per share basic |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
1.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
Income per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
Cash dividend per share declared |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
Key Performance Indicators
Management regularly reviews financial and non-financial performance indicators to assess the
Companys operating results. The following table sets forth, for the quarterly periods indicated,
certain of managements key financial performance indicators:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
May 31, |
|
February 28, |
|
November 30, |
|
August 31, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
Sales cycle |
|
11 days |
|
11 days |
|
16 days |
|
17 days |
Inventory turns |
|
7 turns |
|
7 turns |
|
7 turns |
|
7 turns |
Days in trade accounts receivable |
|
22 days |
|
24 days |
|
26 days |
|
33 days |
Days in inventory |
|
52 days |
|
53 days |
|
52 days |
|
53 days |
Days in accounts payable |
|
63 days |
|
66 days |
|
62 days |
|
69 days |
The sales cycle is calculated as the sum of days in trade accounts receivable and days in
inventory, less the days in accounts payable; accordingly, the variance in the sales cycle quarter
over quarter is a direct result of changes in these indicators. During the three months ended May
31, 2011, days in trade accounts receivable decreased two days to 22 days as compared to the prior
sequential quarter as a result of the amendment to our foreign asset-backed securitization program,
which resulted in the receivables being sold to a third party financial institution, and no longer
being recognized in trade accounts receivable. Previously the program was accounted for as a
secured borrowing and the transferred receivables were recorded in trade accounts receivable. See
Note 8 Trade Accounts Receivable Securitization and Sales Programs to the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for further details. During the three months ended May 31, 2011,
days in inventory decreased one day to 52 days as compared to the prior
30
sequential quarter largely
due to increased sales activity during the quarter. Inventory turns remained constant at seven
turns as compared to the prior sequential quarter. During the three months ended May 31, 2011, days
in accounts payable decreased three days to 63 days as compared to the prior sequential quarter, as
a result of the timing of purchases and cash payments during the quarter.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) requires management to
make estimates and judgments that affect our reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues
and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis,
we evaluate our estimates and assumptions based upon historical experience and various other
factors and circumstances. Management believes that our estimates and assumptions are reasonable
under the circumstances; however, actual results may vary from these estimates and assumptions
under different future circumstances. We have identified the following critical accounting policies
that affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements. For further discussion of our significant accounting policies,
refer to Note 1 Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
August 31, 2010.
Revenue Recognition
We derive revenue principally from manufacturing services related to electronic equipment
built to customer specifications. We also derive revenue to a lesser extent from aftermarket
services, design services and excess inventory sales. Revenue from manufacturing services and
excess inventory sales is generally recognized, net of estimated product return costs, when goods
are shipped; title and risk of ownership have passed; the price to the buyer is fixed or
determinable; and recoverability is reasonably assured. Aftermarket service related revenue is
recognized upon completion of the services. Design service related revenue is generally recognized
upon completion and acceptance by the respective customer. We assume no significant obligations
after product shipment.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts related to receivables not expected to be
collected from our customers. This allowance is based on managements assessment of specific
customer balances, considering the age of receivables and financial stability of the customer. If
there is an adverse change in the financial condition and circumstances of our customers, or if
actual defaults are higher than provided for, an addition to the allowance may be necessary.
Inventory Valuation
We purchase inventory based on forecasted demand and record inventory at the lower of cost or
market. Management regularly assesses inventory valuation based on current and forecasted usage,
customer inventory-related contractual obligations and other lower of cost or market
considerations. If actual market conditions or our customers product demands are less favorable
than those projected, additional valuation adjustments may be necessary.
Long-Lived Assets
We review property, plant and equipment and amortizable intangible assets for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not
be recoverable. Recoverability of property, plant and equipment is measured by comparing its
carrying value to the undiscounted projected cash flows that the asset(s) or asset group(s) are
expected to generate. If the carrying amount of an asset or an asset group is not recoverable, we
recognize an impairment loss based on the excess of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset
over its respective fair value, which is generally determined as either the present value of
estimated future cash flows or the appraised value. The impairment analysis is based on significant
assumptions of future results made by management, including revenue and cash flow projections.
Circumstances that may lead to impairment of property, plant and equipment include unforeseen
decreases in future performance or industry demand and the restructuring of our operations
resulting from a change in our business strategy or adverse economic conditions.
We have recorded intangible assets, including goodwill, in connection with business
acquisitions. Estimated useful lives of amortizable intangible assets are determined by management
based on an assessment of the period over which the asset is expected to contribute to future cash
flows. The fair value of acquired amortizable intangible assets impacts the amounts recorded as
goodwill.
We perform a goodwill impairment analysis using the two-step method on an annual basis and
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be
recoverable. The recoverability of goodwill is measured at the reporting unit level, which we have
determined to be consistent with our operating segments, by comparing the reporting units carrying
amount, including goodwill, to the fair value of the reporting unit. We determine the fair value of
our reporting units based on an average weighting of both projected discounted future results and
the use of comparative market multiples. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its
fair value, goodwill is considered impaired and a second test is performed to measure the amount of
loss, if any.
31
We completed our annual impairment test for goodwill during the fourth quarter of fiscal year
2010 and determined that the fair values of our reporting units are substantially in excess of the
carrying values and that no impairment existed as of the date of the impairment test. In addition,
on September 1, 2010, we reorganized our business into the DMS, E&I and HVS segments. In doing so,
we reassigned goodwill to the new reporting units (which are deemed to be consistent with our
segments) and were required to perform an interim goodwill impairment test based on these new
reporting units. Based on this interim goodwill impairment test, we determined that the fair
values of our new reporting units are substantially in excess of the carrying values and no
impairment existed as of the date of the interim impairment test.
Restructuring and Impairment Charges
We have recognized restructuring and impairment charges related to reductions in workforce,
re-sizing and closure of certain facilities and the transition of production from certain
facilities into other new and existing facilities. These charges were recorded pursuant to formal
plans developed and approved by management and our Board of Directors. The recognition of
restructuring and impairment charges requires that we make certain judgments and estimates
regarding the nature, timing and amount of costs associated with these plans. The estimates of
future liabilities may change, requiring additional restructuring and impairment charges or the
reduction of liabilities already recorded. At the end of each reporting period, we evaluate the
remaining accrued balances to ensure that no excess accruals are retained and the utilization of
the provisions are for their intended purpose in accordance with the restructuring programs.
Retirement Benefits
We have pension and postretirement benefit costs and liabilities in certain foreign locations
that are developed from actuarial valuations. Actuarial valuations require management to make
certain judgments and estimates of discount rates, compensation rate increases and return on plan
assets. We evaluate these assumptions on a regular basis taking into consideration current market
conditions and historical market data. The discount rate is used to state expected future cash
flows at a present value on the measurement date. This rate represents the market rate for
high-quality fixed income investments. A lower discount rate increases the present value of benefit
obligations and increases pension expense. When considering the expected long-term rate of return
on pension plan assets, we take into account current and expected asset allocations, as well as
historical and expected returns on plan assets. Other assumptions include demographic factors such
as retirement, mortality and turnover. For further discussion of our pension and postretirement
benefits, refer to Note 9 Retirement Benefits to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Income Taxes
We estimate our income tax provision in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate, a
process that includes estimating exposures related to examinations by taxing authorities. We must
also make judgments regarding the ability to realize the deferred tax assets. The carrying value of
our net deferred tax assets is based on our belief that it is more likely than not that we will
generate sufficient future taxable income in certain jurisdictions to realize these deferred tax
assets. A valuation allowance has been established for deferred tax assets that we do not believe
meet the more likely than not criteria. We assess whether an uncertain tax position taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return meets the threshold for recognition and measurement in the
Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements. Our judgments regarding future taxable income as well as tax positions taken
or expected to be taken in a tax return may change due to changes in market conditions, changes in
tax laws or other factors. If our assumptions and consequently our estimates change in the future,
the valuation allowances and/or tax reserves established may be increased or decreased, resulting
in a respective increase or decrease in income tax expense.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) completed its field examination of our tax returns for
the fiscal years 2003 through 2005 and issued a Revenue Agents Report (RAR) on April 30, 2010
proposing adjustments primarily related to the IRS contentions that (1) certain corporate expenses
relate to services provided to foreign affiliates and therefore must be charged to those
affiliates, and (2) valuable intangible property was transferred to certain foreign affiliates
without charge. If the IRS ultimately prevails in its positions, our income tax payment due for the
fiscal years 2003 through 2005 would be approximately an additional $69.3 million before
utilization of any tax attributes arising in periods subsequent to fiscal year 2005. In addition,
the IRS will likely make similar claims in future audits with respect to these types of
transactions (at this time, determination of the additional income tax due for these later years is
not practicable). Also, the IRS has proposed interest and penalties on us with respect to fiscal
years 2003 through 2005, and we anticipate the IRS may seek to impose interest and penalties in
subsequent years with respect to the same types of issues.
We disagree with the proposed adjustments and are vigorously contesting this matter through
applicable IRS and judicial procedures, as appropriate. As the final resolution of the proposed
adjustments remains uncertain, we continue to provide for the uncertain tax position based on the
more likely than not standards. Accordingly, we did not record any significant additional tax
32
liabilities related to this RAR on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for the nine months
ended May 31, 2011. While the resolution of the issues may result in tax liabilities, interest and
penalties, which are significantly higher than the amounts provided for this matter, management
currently believes that the resolution will not have a material effect on our financial position or
liquidity. Despite this belief, an unfavorable resolution, particularly if the IRS successfully
asserts similar claims for later years, could have a material effect on our results of operations
and financial condition (particularly during the quarter in which any adjustment is recorded or any
tax is due or paid). For further discussion related to our income taxes, refer to Note 12
Income Taxes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Risk Factors We are subject
to the risk of increased taxes and Note 4 Income Taxes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010.
Stock-Based Compensation
We recognize stock-based compensation expense within our Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations related to stock appreciation rights using a lattice model to determine the fair value.
Option pricing models require the input of subjective assumptions, including the expected life of
the option or stock appreciation right, risk-free rate, expected dividend yield and the price
volatility of the underlying stock. Judgment is also required in estimating the number of stock
awards that are expected to vest as a result of satisfaction of time-based vesting schedules or the
achievement of certain performance or market conditions. If actual results or future changes in
estimates differ significantly from our current estimates, stock-based compensation expense could
increase or decrease. For further discussion of our stock-based compensation, refer to Note 4
Stock-Based Compensation to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Recent Accounting Guidance
See Note 15 New Accounting Guidance to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for
a discussion of recent accounting guidance.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain statements of operations
data expressed as a percentage of net revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
May 31, |
|
May 31, |
|
May 31, |
|
May 31, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Net revenue |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of revenue |
|
|
92.5 |
% |
|
|
92.4 |
% |
|
|
92.4 |
% |
|
|
92.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
Research and development |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Restructuring and impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Settlement of receivables and related charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
Income tax expense |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling
interests, net of income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Jabil Circuit, Inc. |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months and Nine Months Ended May 31, 2011 Compared to the Three Months and Nine
Months Ended May 31, 2010
33
Net Revenue. Our net revenue for the three months ended May 31, 2011 increased 22.3% to $4.2
billion up from $3.5 billion for the three months ended May 31, 2010. Specific increases include a
94% increase in the sale of specialized services products; a 23% increase in the sale of
instrumentation and healthcare products; a 15% increase in the sale of industrial and CleanTech
products; a 15% increase in the sale of E&I products; and a 10% increase in the sale of HVS
products.
Our net revenue for the nine months ended May 31, 2011 increased 28.2% to $12.2 billion up
from $9.5 billion for the nine months ended May 31, 2010. Specific increases include a 77% increase
in the sale of specialized services products; a 39% increase in the sale of instrumentation and
healthcare products; a 21% increase in the sale of industrial and CleanTech products; a 21%
increase in the sale of E&I products; and a 20% increase in the sale of HVS products.
These increases for the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2011 are primarily due to
increased revenue from certain of our existing customers, including new program wins with these
customers, as certain of our customers confidence in their markets strengthen and their
end-customers demand levels increase. These drivers of the net revenue increases may be
negatively impacted by the ongoing situation in Japan (resulting from the recent earthquake and
tsunami), and its effects on our Japanese facility, supply chain, shipping costs, customers and
suppliers.
Generally, we assess revenue on a global customer basis regardless of whether the growth is
associated with organic growth or as a result of an acquisition. Accordingly, we do not
differentiate or report separately revenue increases generated by acquisitions as opposed to
existing business. In addition, the added cost structures associated with our acquisitions have
historically been relatively insignificant when compared to our overall cost structure.
The distribution of revenue across our sectors has fluctuated, and will continue to fluctuate,
as a result of numerous factors, including but not limited to the following: fluctuations in
customer demand as a result of recent recessionary conditions; efforts to de-emphasize the economic
performance of certain sectors, most specifically, our former automotive sector; seasonality in our
business; and business growth from new and existing customers. As discussed in the Overview
section, on September 1, 2010, we reorganized our business into the following three segments: DMS,
E&I and HVS. In conjunction with this reorganization, there have been certain reclassifications
made within the reported sectors.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, revenue by segment expressed as a
percentage of net revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
May 31, |
|
May 31, |
|
May 31, |
|
May 31, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
DMS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialized Services |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
Industrial & CleanTech |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
Instrumentation & Healthcare |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total DMS |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total E&I |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total HVS |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign source revenue represented 85.8% and 85.7% of net revenue for the three months
and nine months ended May 31, 2011, respectively. This is compared to 84.3% and 84.5% of net
revenue for the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2010, respectively. We currently expect
our foreign source revenue to slightly increase as compared to current levels over the course of
the next twelve months.
Gross Profit. Gross profit increased to $318.4 million (7.5% of net revenue) and $925.4
million (7.6% of net revenue) for the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2011,
respectively, from $262.1 million (7.6% of net revenue) and $716.6 million (7.5% of net revenue)
for the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2010, respectively. The increases in gross
profit on an absolute basis and as a percentage of net revenue for the three months and nine months
ended May 31, 2011 versus the same period during the prior fiscal year were primarily due to
increased revenue from certain of our existing customers, including new program wins with these
customers, as certain of our customers confidence in their markets strengthen and their
end-customers demand levels increase
34
which allow us to better utilize capacity and absorb fixed
costs, an increased focus on controlling costs and improving productivity and additional growth in
the DMS segment, which typically has higher margins than the E&I and HVS segments.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased to
$154.1 million (3.6% of net revenue) for the three months ended May 31, 2011 from $151.4 million
(4.4% of net revenue) for the three months ended May 31, 2010. This increase was largely due to
additional salary expense associated with increased headcount, partially offset by a decrease in
stock-based compensation expense of $7.4 million. The decrease in stock-based compensation expense
was largely due to a cumulative adjustment recorded during the three months ended May 31, 2010 for
certain performance-based restricted stock awards that were anticipated to vest at 110% versus 40%,
as previously estimated, whereas a corresponding adjustment to increase stock-based compensation
expense did not occur during the three months ended May 31, 2011.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased to $438.4 million (3.6% of net revenue)
for the nine months ended May 31, 2011 from $429.2 million (4.4% of net revenue) for the nine
months ended May 31, 2010. This increase was largely due to additional salary and salary related
expense associated with increased headcount, partially offset by a decrease in stock-based
compensation expense of $8.1 million. The decrease in stock-based compensation expense was due
largely to recognizing less stock-based compensation expense associated with stock appreciation
right (SARs) awards during the nine months ended May 31, 2011 as compared to the nine months
ended May 31, 2010 as we have not granted such awards since fiscal year 2008.
Research and Development. Research and development expenses remained relatively consistent at
$6.5 million (0.2% of net revenue) for the three months ended May 31, 2011 as compared with $6.3
million (0.2% of net revenue) for the three months ended May 31, 2010. Research and development
expenses decreased to $18.8 million (0.2% of net revenue) for the nine months ended May 31, 2011
from $21.5 million (0.2% of net revenue) for the nine months ended May 31, 2010. The decrease for
the nine months ended May 31, 2011 was primarily due to a greater portion of engineering resources
working on customer funded design projects.
Amortization of Intangibles. We recorded $5.2 million and $16.8 million of amortization of
intangible assets for the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2011, respectively, compared
to $6.2 million and $20.0 million for the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2010,
respectively. The decrease is primarily attributable to certain intangible assets that became fully
amortized since May 31, 2010. For additional information regarding purchased intangibles, see Note
7 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Restructuring and Impairment Charges.
a. 2009 Restructuring Plan
Upon the approval by our Board of Directors, we initiated a restructuring plan during the
second quarter of fiscal year 2009 (the 2009 Restructuring Plan). We have substantially
completed restructuring activities under this plan and do not expect to incur any additional costs
under the 2009 Restructuring Plan.
We did not record any restructuring and impairment costs during the three months ended May 31,
2011, compared to charges of $1.6 million recorded during the three months ended May 31, 2010.
During the nine months ended May 31, 2011, we reversed $0.1 million of previously recognized
restructuring and impairment costs, compared to charges of $5.4 million of restructuring and
impairment costs recorded during the nine months ended May 31, 2010. The reversals related to the
2009 Restructuring Plan incurred during the nine months ended May 31, 2011 are primarily related to
revised estimates for lease commitment costs.
At May 31, 2011, accrued liabilities of approximately $0.1 million related to the 2009
Restructuring Plan are expected to be paid over the next fiscal quarter.
As of May 31, 2011, the 2009 Restructuring Plan is expected to yield annualized cost savings
of approximately $55.6 million, which we are now fully realizing. The majority of these annual cost
savings are expected to be reflected as a reduction in cost of revenue, with a small portion being
reflected as a reduction of selling, general and administrative expense. These expected annualized
cost savings reflect a reduction in employee expense of approximately $42.4 million, a reduction in
depreciation expense of approximately $5.9 million, a reduction in lease commitment costs of
approximately $0.1 million, a reduction of other manufacturing costs of approximately $3.8 million
and a reduction of selling, general and administrative expenses of approximately $3.4 million.
As part of the 2009 Restructuring Plan, we have determined that it was more likely than not
that certain deferred tax assets would not be realized as a result of the contemplated
restructuring activities. Therefore, we recorded a valuation allowance of $14.8 million on net
deferred tax assets related to the 2009 Restructuring Plan. The valuation allowance is excluded
from the restructuring and impairment charges incurred through May 31, 2011 as it was recorded to
income tax expense within our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
35
b. 2006 Restructuring Plan
Upon the approval by our Board of Directors, we initiated a restructuring plan during the
fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006 (the 2006 Restructuring Plan). We have substantially completed
restructuring activities under this plan and do not expect to incur any additional costs under the
2006 Restructuring Plan.
We did not record any restructuring and impairment costs during the three months ended May 31,
2011, compared to charges of $0.1 million recorded during the three months ended May 31, 2010.
During the nine months ended May 31, 2011, we recorded approximately $0.7 million of restructuring
and impairment costs, compared to charges of $0.3 million of restructuring and impairment charges
recorded during the nine months ended May 31, 2010. The restructuring and impairment costs for the
nine months ended May 31, 2011 are primarily related to lease commitment costs.
At May 31, 2011, liabilities of approximately $0.5 million related to the 2006 Restructuring
Plan are expected to be paid out over the next twelve months. The remaining liability of $2.1
million relates primarily to the charge for employee severance and termination benefits payments.
Settlement of Receivables and Related Charges. We recorded a loss on settlement of
receivables and related charges of $13.6 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2011. During
the second quarter of fiscal year 2011, we completed our acquisition of F-I Holding Company, which
directly or indirectly wholly owns Competence France Holdings SAS, a French entity which wholly
owns Competence France SAS, and Competence EMEA S.r.l., an Italian entity which wholly owns
Competence Italia S.r.l. (Competence France Holdings SAS, Competence France SAS, Competence EMEA
S.r.l. and Competence Italia S.r.l. are collectively referred to as the Competence Sites herein).
The Competence Sites were our former operations and were previously disposed of on July 16, 2010.
Refer to Note 13 Loss on Disposal of Subsidiaries to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements for further details.
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2011, immediately prior to the acquisition of
the Competence Sites, we recognized a charge of $12.7 million in order to record $35.0 million in
receivables and other relationships with the Competence Sites at their respective fair values. In
addition, we recognized acquisition costs and other related charges of $0.9 million during the
second quarter of fiscal year 2011 . Refer to Note 14 Business Acquisitions to the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.
Loss on Disposal of Subsidiaries. We recorded a loss on disposal of subsidiaries of $23.9
million for the nine months ended May 31, 2011 and $15.7 million for the nine months ended May 31,
2010.
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, we sold the operations of Jabil Circuit
Automotive, SAS, an automotive electronic manufacturing subsidiary located in Western Europe to an
unrelated third party. In connection with this sale, we recorded a loss on disposition of
approximately $15.7 million, which includes approximately $4.2 million in transaction costs
incurred in connection with the sale during the three months ended November 30, 2009.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010, we sold F-I Holding Company, which directly or
indirectly wholly owns the Competence Sites, to an unrelated third party. In connection with this
transaction, we provided an aggregate $25.0 million working capital loan to the disposed operations
and agreed to provide for the aggregate potential reimbursement of up to $10.0 million in
restructuring costs dependent upon the occurrence of certain future events. During the second
quarter of fiscal year 2011, we recorded a charge of $18.5 million to loss on disposal of
subsidiaries within the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations to fully write-off the
remaining balance of the working capital loan as we deemed it no longer collectible. In addition,
we recorded a charge of $5.4 million during the second quarter of fiscal year 2011 to write off a
purchase price related receivable that we were due from the
third party purchaser as it was deemed no longer collectible. Refer to Note 13 Loss on
Disposal of Subsidiaries to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further
discussion.
Other Expense. We recorded other expense of $1.8 million and $2.4 million during the three
months and nine months ended May 31, 2011, respectively, as compared to $1.0 million and $3.1
million for the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2010, respectively. The increase in
other expense for the three months ended May 31, 2011 as compared to the three months ended May 31,
2010, was primarily due to fees incurred in connection with the amendment to our foreign
asset-backed securitization program during the third quarter of fiscal year 2011. See Note 8
Trade Accounts Receivable Securitization and Sales Programs to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for further details. The decrease in other expense for the nine months ended
May 31, 2011 as compared to the nine months ended May 31, 2010, was primarily due to an incremental
gain that we recognized of $1.2 million associated with the purchase of receivables from an
unrelated third party and an incremental gain of $0.4 million associated with the sale of an
available-for-sale security during the nine months ended May 31, 2011. In addition, for a portion
of the nine months ended May 31, 2011, $0.5 million related to the loss under the non-foreign
asset-backed securitization program was recorded to interest expense instead of other expense as
the program was accounted for as a secured borrowing during a portion of that time.
36
Interest Income. Interest income remained relatively constant at $0.9 million and $2.5 million
for the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2011, respectively, compared to $0.6 million and
$2.2 million for the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2010.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased to $25.1 million and $73.1 million for the three
months and nine months ended May 31, 2011, respectively, from $19.5 million and $59.6 million for
the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2010, respectively. The increase was primarily due
to interest associated with the issuance of our 5.625% Senior Notes during the first quarter of
fiscal year 2011 and the refinancing of the credit facility dated as of July 19, 2007 (the Old
Credit Facility) at market rates during the second quarter of fiscal year 2011.
Income Taxes. Income tax expense reflects an effective tax rate of 17.6% and 21.4% for the
three months and nine months ended May 31, 2011, respectively, compared to an effective tax rate of
31.3% and 32.1% for the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2010, respectively. The
effective tax rate for the three months ended May 31, 2011 differs from the effective tax rate for
the three months ended May 31, 2010 predominantly due to the amount of earnings and the mix of tax
rates in the various jurisdictions in which we do business. The effective tax rate for the nine
months ended May 31, 2011 differs from the effective tax rate for the nine months ended May 31,
2010 predominantly due to the amount of earnings and the mix of tax rates in the various
jurisdictions in which we do business and the sale of a French subsidiary in fiscal year 2010,
partially offset by the acquisition of previously divested operations during the second quarter of
fiscal year 2011. Most of our international operations have historically been taxed at a lower rate
than in the U.S., primarily due to tax incentives granted to our sites in Brazil, China, Hungary,
Malaysia, Poland, Singapore and Vietnam. The material tax incentives expire at various dates
through 2020. Such tax incentives are subject to conditions with which we expect to continue to
comply. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Income Taxes, Risk Factors We are subject to
the risk of increased taxes and Note 4 Income Taxes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010 for further discussion.
Non-U.S. GAAP Core Financial Measures
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations
include certain non-U.S. GAAP financial measures as identified in the reconciliation below. The
non-U.S. GAAP financial measures disclosed herein do not have standard meaning and may vary from
the non-U.S. GAAP financial measures used by other companies or how we may calculate those measures
in other instances from time to time. Non-U.S. GAAP financial measures should not be considered a
substitute for, or superior to, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with U.S.
GAAP. Also, our core financial measures should not be construed as an inference by us that our
future results will be unaffected by those items which are excluded from our core financial
measures.
Management believes that the non-U.S. GAAP core financial measures set forth below are
useful to facilitate evaluating the past and future performance of our ongoing manufacturing
operations over multiple periods on a comparable basis by excluding the effects of the amortization
of intangibles, stock-based compensation expense and related charges, restructuring and impairment
charges, settlement of receivables and related charges and loss on disposal of subsidiaries. Among
other uses, management uses non-U.S. GAAP core financial measures as a factor in determining
employee performance when determining incentive compensation.
We are reporting core operating income and core earnings to provide investors with an
additional method for assessing operating income and earnings, presenting what we believe are our
core manufacturing operations. Most of the items that are excluded for purposes of calculating
core operating income and core earnings also impacted certain balance sheet assets, resulting
in all or a portion of an asset being written off without a corresponding recovery of cash we may
have previously spent with respect to the asset. In the case of restructuring charges, we may be
making associated cash payments in the future. In addition, although, for purposes of calculating
core operating income and core earnings, we exclude stock-based compensation expense (which we
anticipate continuing to incur in the future) because it is a non-cash expense, the associated
stock issued may result in an increase in our outstanding shares of stock, which may result in the
dilution of our stockholders ownership interest. We encourage you to evaluate these items and the
limitations for purposes of analysis in excluding them.
Included in the table below is a reconciliation of the non-U.S. GAAP financial measures to the
most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measures as provided in our Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements (in thousands):
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (U.S. GAAP) |
|
$ |
152,533 |
|
|
$ |
96,533 |
|
|
$ |
413,174 |
|
|
$ |
224,576 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
5,187 |
|
|
|
6,206 |
|
|
|
16,821 |
|
|
|
19,954 |
|
Stock-based compensation and related charges |
|
|
20,053 |
|
|
|
27,487 |
|
|
|
59,854 |
|
|
|
67,980 |
|
Restructuring and impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,635 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
5,705 |
|
Settlement of receivables and related
charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,944 |
|
|
|
15,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core operating income (Non-U.S. GAAP) |
|
$ |
177,773 |
|
|
$ |
131,861 |
|
|
$ |
528,028 |
|
|
$ |
333,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Jabil Circuit,
Inc. (U.S. GAAP) |
|
$ |
104,695 |
|
|
$ |
52,031 |
|
|
$ |
266,775 |
|
|
$ |
110,149 |
|
Amortization of intangibles, net of tax |
|
|
5,174 |
|
|
|
6,191 |
|
|
|
16,785 |
|
|
|
19,919 |
|
Stock-based compensation and related
charges, net of tax |
|
|
19,268 |
|
|
|
26,825 |
|
|
|
58,279 |
|
|
|
66,713 |
|
Restructuring and impairment charges, net
of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,693 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
5,777 |
|
Settlement of receivables and related
charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of subsidiaries, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,944 |
|
|
|
15,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core earnings (Non-U.S. GAAP) |
|
$ |
129,137 |
|
|
$ |
86,740 |
|
|
$ |
380,018 |
|
|
$ |
218,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: (U.S. GAAP) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
1.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core earnings per share: (Non-U.S. GAAP) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
1.77 |
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
1.72 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares used in the calculations of
earnings per share (U.S. GAAP & Non-U.S.
GAAP): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
215,705 |
|
|
|
213,881 |
|
|
|
215,092 |
|
|
|
214,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
222,337 |
|
|
|
216,522 |
|
|
|
220,773 |
|
|
|
218,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
Core operating income for the three months ended May 31, 2011 increased 34.8% to $177.8
million compared to $131.9 million for the three months ended May 31, 2010. Core operating income
for the nine months ended May 31, 2011 increased 58.1% to $528.0 million compared to $333.9 million
for the nine months ended May 31, 2010. Core earnings for the three months ended May 31, 2011
increased 48.9% to $129.1 million compared to $86.7 million for the three months ended May 31,
2010. Core earnings for the nine months ended May 31, 2011 increased 74.1% to $380.0 million
compared to $218.3 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2010. These increases were the result
of the same factors described above in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations For the Three Months and Nine Months Ended May 31, 2011 Compared to
the Three Months and Nine Months Ended May 31, 2010 Gross Profit.
Acquisitions and Expansion
As discussed in Note 13 Loss on Disposal of Subsidiaries and Note 14 Business
Acquisitions to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, we completed our acquisition of
the Competence Sites in France and Italy during the second quarter of fiscal year 2011. The
Competence Sites were our former operations and were previously disposed of during the fourth
quarter of fiscal year 2010. This acquisition, along with acquisitions in prior years, were
accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. Our Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements include the operating results of each business from the date of acquisition. See Risk
Factors We have on occasion not achieved, and may not in the future achieve, expected
profitability from our acquisitions.
Seasonality
Production levels for the DMS and HVS segments are subject to seasonal influences. We may
realize greater net revenue during our first fiscal quarter due to higher demand for consumer
related products manufactured in the DMS and HVS segments during the holiday selling season.
Therefore, quarterly results should not be relied upon as necessarily being indicative of results
for the entire fiscal year.
Dividends
The following table sets forth certain information relating to our cash dividends declared to
common stockholders during fiscal years 2011 and 2010:
Dividend Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend |
|
Dividend |
|
Dividends |
|
Date of Record for |
|
Dividend Cash |
|
|
Declaration Date |
|
per Share |
|
Declared |
|
Dividend Payment |
|
Payment Date |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except for per share data) |
|
Fiscal year 2011: |
|
October 25, 2010 |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
15,563 |
|
|
November 15, 2010 |
|
December 1, 2010 |
|
|
January 25, 2011 |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
15,634 |
|
|
February 15, 2011 |
|
March 1, 2011 |
|
|
April 13, 2011 |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
15,647 |
|
|
May 16, 2011 |
|
June 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2010: |
|
October 22, 2009 |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
15,186 |
(1) |
|
November 16, 2009 |
|
December 1, 2009 |
|
|
January 22, 2010 |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
15,238 |
|
|
February 16, 2010 |
|
March 1, 2010 |
|
|
April 14, 2010 |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
15,221 |
|
|
May 17, 2010 |
|
June 1, 2010 |
|
|
July 22, 2010 |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
15,247 |
|
|
August 16, 2010 |
|
September 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Of the $15.2 million in total dividends declared during the first quarter of
fiscal year 2010, $14.4 million was paid out of additional paid-in capital (which
represents the amount of dividends declared in excess of the Companys retained earnings
balance at the date that the dividends were declared). |
We currently expect to continue to declare and pay quarterly dividends of an amount similar to
our past declarations. However, the declaration and payment of future dividends are discretionary
and will be subject to determination by our Board of Directors each quarter following its review of
our financial performance.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At May 31, 2011, our principle sources of liquidity consisted of cash, available borrowings
under our credit facilities and the accounts receivable securitization and uncommitted sale
programs.
39
The following table sets forth, for the nine months ended May 31, 2011 and 2010,
selected consolidated cash flow information (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
524,417 |
|
|
$ |
142,176 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(298,032 |
) |
|
|
(237,861 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(59,880 |
) |
|
|
(143,309 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents |
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
(36,929 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
166,816 |
|
|
$ |
(275,923 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended May 31, 2011 was
approximately $524.4 million. This resulted primarily from net income of $267.4 million, $234.3
million in non-cash depreciation and amortization expense, a $148.3 million increase in accounts
payable and accrued expenses, a $100.2 million decrease in trade accounts receivable and $59.9
million in non-cash stock-based compensation; which were partially offset by a $187.1 million
increase in inventories and a $145.4 million increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets.
The decrease in trade accounts receivable was primarily driven by the amendment to our foreign
asset-backed securitization program which resulted in the receivables being sold to a third party
bank no longer being recognized in trade accounts receivable whereas previously the program was
accounted for as a secured borrowing, partially offset by increased sales levels. See Note 8
Trade Accounts Receivable Securitization and Sales Programs to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for further details. The increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses was
primarily driven by the timing of purchases and cash payments. The increase in inventories was
primarily due to the ramp up of inventory levels to support new business wins and higher revenue
levels. The increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets was primarily driven by an
increase in the deferred purchase price receivable under the non-foreign asset-based securitization
program due to the timing of cash payments and the sale of receivables under the program. While we
continue to monitor the ongoing situation in Japan, as a result of the recent earthquake and
tsunami, our inventories may increase in reaction to potential supply chain disruptions.
Net cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended May 31, 2011 was $298.0
million. This consisted primarily of capital expenditures of $321.0 million principally for
machinery and equipment for new business, including new process technology within our DMS segment,
maintenance levels of machinery and equipment and information technology infrastructure upgrades;
which were partially offset by $13.7 million of proceeds from the sale of property and equipment.
Net cash used in financing activities for the nine months ended May 31, 2011 was $59.9
million. This resulted from our receipt of approximately $5.7 billion of proceeds from borrowings
under existing debt agreements, which primarily included an aggregate of $4.9 billion of borrowings
under the Companys five year unsecured credit facility amended as of December 7, 2010 (the
Amended and Restated Credit Facility) and $400.0 million in borrowings as we completed the
offering of $400.0 million in aggregate principal amount of publicly-registered 5.625% senior
unsecured notes (the 5.625% Senior Notes). This was offset by repayments in an aggregate amount
of approximately $5.7 billion during the nine months ended May 31, 2011, which primarily included
an aggregate of $4.9 billion of repayments under the Amended and Restated Credit Facility and
$340.0 million under the term portion of the Old Credit Facility. In addition, we paid $45.3
million of dividends to stockholders during fiscal year 2011.
We may need to finance day-to-day working capital needs, as well as future growth and any
corresponding working capital needs, with additional borrowings under the Amended and Restated
Credit Facility and our other revolving credit facilities described below, as well as additional
public and private offerings of our debt and equity. Currently, we have a shelf registration
statement with the SEC registering the potential sale of an indeterminate amount of debt and equity
securities in the future, from time to time, to augment our liquidity and capital resources.
In connection with our non-foreign asset-backed securitization program, we regularly sell a
designated pool of trade accounts receivable to a wholly-owned subsidiary, which in turn sells 100%
of the eligible receivables to conduits, administered by unaffiliated financial institutions. This
wholly-owned subsidiary is a separate bankruptcy-remote entity and its assets would be available
first to satisfy the creditor claims of the conduits. As the receivables sold are collected, the
wholly-owned subsidiary is able to sell additional receivables up to the maximum permitted amount
under the program. Net cash proceeds of $300.0 million are available at any one time under the
securitization program. Prior to September 1, 2010, the transactions in this program were accounted
for as sales under applicable accounting guidance. Effective September 1, 2010, we adopted new
accounting guidance that resulted in more stringent conditions for reporting the transfer of a
financial asset as a sale. As a result of the adoption of this new guidance, the accounts
receivable transferred under this program no longer qualified for sale treatment and as such were
accounted for as secured borrowings. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2011, this program was
amended to again account for the transfers of the applicable accounts receivable as sales. Under
the amended program any portion of the purchase price for the receivables which is not paid in cash
upon the sale taking place is recorded as a deferred purchase price receivable, which is paid by
the conduits from available cash as
40
payments on the receivables are collected. The securitization
program requires compliance with several financial covenants including an interest coverage ratio
and debt to EBITDA ratio, as defined in the securitization agreements. The securitization
agreement, as amended on November 5, 2010, expires on November 4, 2011. Net receivables sold under
this program are excluded from trade accounts receivable on the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets and are reflected as cash provided by operating activities on the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows. The wholly-owned subsidiary is assessed (i) a fee on the unused portion
of the program of 0.50% per annum based on the average daily unused aggregate receivables sold
during the period and (ii) a usage fee on the utilized portion of the program is equal to 0.95% per
annum (inclusive of the unused fee) on the average daily outstanding aggregate receivables sold
during the immediately preceding calendar month. The securitization conduits and the investors in
the conduits have no recourse to our assets for failure of debtors to pay when due. We continue to
service the receivables sold and in exchange receive a servicing fee. Servicing fees recognized
during the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2011 and 2010 were not material and are
included in other expense within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. We do not
record a servicing asset or liability as we estimate the fee we receive in return for our
obligation to service these receivables is at fair value. We sold $1.4 billion and $4.3 billion of
eligible trade accounts receivable during the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2011,
respectively. In exchange, we received cash proceeds of $1.1 billion and $4.0 billion during the
three months and nine months ended May 31, 2011, respectively, and a net deferred purchase price
receivable. At May 31, 2011, the deferred purchase price receivable totaled approximately $280.1
million, which was recorded initially at fair value as prepaid expenses and other current assets on
the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The deferred purchase price receivable was valued using
unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs), primarily discounted cash flows, and due to its credit
quality and short-term maturity the fair value approximated book value. We sold $1.1 billion and
$3.6 billion of eligible trade accounts receivable during the three months and nine months ended
May 31, 2010, respectively. In exchange, we received cash proceeds of $0.9 billion and $3.4 billion
during the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2010, respectively, and retained an interest
in the receivables of approximately $144.6 million at May 31, 2010. We recognized pretax losses on
the sales of receivables of approximately $0.8 million and $2.7 million during the three months and
nine months ended May 31, 2011 compared to $0.9 million and $2.9 million during the three months
and nine months ended May 31, 2010, respectively, which are recorded to other expense within the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Prior to execution of the previously discussed
amendment, we recognized interest expense of approximately $0.5 million during the first quarter of
fiscal year 2011 associated with the secured borrowings. See Note 8 Trade Accounts Receivable
Securitization and Sale Programs and Note 15 New Accounting Guidance to the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In connection with our non-foreign asset-backed securitization program, at May 31, 2011, we
had sold $469.3 million of eligible trade accounts receivable, which represents the face amount of
total outstanding receivables at that date. In exchange, the Company received cash proceeds of
$188.0 million, and a net deferred purchase price receivable. At May 31, 2011, the deferred
purchase price receivable totaled approximately $280.1 million.
In connection with our foreign asset-backed securitization program, prior to May 11,
2011, certain of our foreign subsidiaries sold, on an ongoing basis, an undivided interest in
designated pools of trade accounts receivable to a special purpose entity, which in turn borrowed
up to $100.0 million from an unaffiliated financial institution and granted a security interest in
the accounts receivable as collateral for the borrowings. The securitization program was accounted
for as a borrowing. The loan balance was calculated based on the terms of the securitization
program agreements. Effective May 11, 2011, the securitization program was amended to provide for
the sale of 100% of our designated trade accounts receivable to the special purpose entity which in
turn sells 100% of the receivables to an unaffiliated financial institution. Net cash proceeds of
$200.0 million are available at any one time under the securitization program. As a result of the
amendment, transfers of the receivables to the unaffiliated financial institution are accounted for
as sales. Under the amended program, any portion of the purchase price for the receivables which is
not paid in cash to the special purpose entity upon the sale taking place is recorded as a deferred
purchase price receivable, which is paid to the special purpose entity as payments on the
receivables are collected. The foreign-asset backed securitization program requires compliance with
several covenants including limitation on certain corporate actions such as mergers and
consolidations. The securitization agreement, as amended on May 11, 2011, expires on May 10, 2012.
As we have the power to direct the activities of the special purpose entity and the obligation to
absorb the majority of the expected losses or the right to receive benefits from the transfer of
trade accounts receivable into the special purpose entity, we are deemed the primary beneficiary.
Accordingly, we consolidate the special purpose entity (which was also the case prior to the
amendment on May 11, 2011). Net receivables sold under this program are excluded from trade
accounts receivable on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and are reflected as cash provided
by operating activities on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The special
purpose entity is assessed (i) a fee in an amount equal to 0.45% per annum multiplied by the
maximum aggregate invested amount during the period and (ii) a fee on the average amount
outstanding under the program during the period multiplied by the applicable rate in effect for the
period (i.e. LIBOR for U.S. dollars and EURIBOR for euros) plus a 0.45% per annum margin. The
unaffiliated financial institution has no recourse to our assets for failure of debtors to pay when
due. We continue servicing the receivables in the program and in exchange receives a servicing fee.
Servicing fees recognized during the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2011 and 2010 were
not material and are included in interest expense up through the amendment date of May 11, 2011 and
in other expense subsequent to May 11, 2011 within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations. We do not record a servicing asset or liability on the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets as we estimate the fee we receive in return for its obligation to service these receivables
is at fair value. Subsequent to the amendment
41
on May 11, 2011 through May 31, 2011, we sold
(including amounts transferred into the program on the amendment date) $352.8 million of eligible
trade accounts receivable. In exchange, we received cash proceeds of $258.9 million during the same period, and
a net deferred purchase price receivable. At May 31, 2011, the deferred purchase price receivable
totaled approximately $93.9 million, which was recorded initially at fair value as prepaid expenses
and other current assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The deferred purchase price
receivable was valued using unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs), primarily discounted cash flows,
and due to its credit quality and short-term maturity the fair value approximated book value. The
resulting losses on the sales of the receivables subsequent to the amendment on May 11, 2011
through May 31, 2011 were $0.5 million and were recorded to other expense within the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations. Prior to execution of the previously discussed amendment, we
recognized interest expense of approximately $0.3 million and $0.9 million for the three months and
nine months ended May 31, 2011 associated with the secured borrowings. At May 31, 2010, we had
$58.1 million of secured borrowings outstanding under the program. In addition, we incurred
interest expense of $0.4 million and $1.8 million recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Operations during the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2010.
In connection with our foreign asset-backed securitization program, at May 31, 2011, we had sold $175.2 million of eligible trade accounts receivable,
which represents the face amount of total outstanding receivables at that date. In exchange the Company received cash proceeds of $81.3 million, and a net deferred purchase
price receivable. At May 31, 2011, the deferred purchase price
receivable totaled approximately $93.9 million.
In connection with a factoring agreement, we transfer ownership of eligible trade accounts
receivable of a foreign subsidiary without recourse to a third party purchaser in exchange for
cash. The factoring of trade accounts receivable under this agreement is accounted for as a sale.
Proceeds on the transfer reflect the face value of the account less a discount. The discount is
recorded as a loss to other expense within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations in
the period of the sale. In April 2011, the factoring agreement was extended through September 30,
2011, at which time it is expected to automatically renew for an additional six-month period. The
receivables sold pursuant to this factoring agreement are excluded from trade accounts receivable on
the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and are reflected
as cash provided by operating activities on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. We
continue to service, administer and collect the receivables sold under this program. Servicing fees
recognized during the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2011 and 2010 were not material,
and were recorded to other expense within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. We
do not record a servicing asset or liability on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as we
estimate the fee we receive in return for our obligation to service these receivables is at fair
value. The third party purchaser has no recourse to our assets for failure of debtors to pay when
due. We sold $14.4 million and $50.6 million of trade accounts receivable during the three months
and nine months ended May 31, 2011, respectively, and in exchange, received cash proceeds of $14.3
million and $50.5 million, respectively. We sold $20.8 million and $68.9 million of trade accounts
during the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2010, respectively, and in exchange, received
cash proceeds of $20.8 million and $68.8 million, respectively. The resulting losses on the sales
of trade accounts receivables sold under this factoring agreement for the three months and nine
months ended May 31, 2011 and 2010 were not material, and were recorded to other expense within the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
In fiscal year 2010, we entered into two separate uncommitted accounts receivable sale
agreements with banks which originally allowed us and certain of our subsidiaries to elect to sell
and the banks to elect to purchase at a discount, on an ongoing basis, up to a maximum of $150.0
million and $75.0 million of specific trade accounts receivable at any one time. The sale programs
have been amended to increase the facility limits from $150.0 million to $200.0 million and from
$75.0 million to $175.0 million of specific trade accounts receivable at any one time. The programs
are accounted for as sales. Net receivables sold under the programs are excluded from trade
accounts receivable on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and are reflected as cash provided
by operating activities on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The $200.0 million
sale program was amended on May 27, 2011. The terms of the agreement were amended such that the
program no longer has a defined termination date and either party can elect to cancel the agreement
at any time with notification. The $175.0 million sale program expires on August 24, 2011. We
continue servicing the receivables in the program. Servicing fees recognized during the three
months and nine months ended May 31, 2011 and 2010 were not material and are included in other
expense within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. We do not record a servicing
asset or liability on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as we estimate the fee we receive
in return for our obligation to service these receivables is at fair value. During the three and
nine months ended May 31, 2011, we sold $697.8 million and $1.8 billion of trade accounts
receivable under these programs, respectively. In exchange, we received cash proceeds of $697.3
million and $1.8 billion, respectively. The resulting losses on the sales of trade accounts
receivable for the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2011, were not material and were
recorded to other expense within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. During the
three and nine months ended May 31, 2010, we sold $43.5 million of trade accounts receivable under
these programs. In exchange, we received cash proceeds of $43.5 million. The resulting losses on
the sales of trade accounts receivable for the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2010,
were not material and were recorded to other expense within the Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Operations.
Notes payable and long-term debt outstanding at May 31, 2011 and August 31, 2010 are
summarized below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
7.750% Senior Notes due 2016 (a) |
|
$ |
303,072 |
|
|
$ |
301,782 |
|
8.250% Senior Notes due 2018 (b) |
|
|
397,426 |
|
|
|
397,140 |
|
5.625% Senior Notes due 2020 (c) |
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under credit facilities (d) |
|
|
78,000 |
|
|
|
73,750 |
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Borrowings under loans (e) |
|
|
2,449 |
|
|
|
342,380 |
|
Securitization program obligations (f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,436 |
|
Miscellaneous borrowings |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Fair value adjustment (g) |
|
|
6,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total notes payable and long-term debt |
|
|
1,187,644 |
|
|
$ |
1,186,496 |
|
Less current installments of notes payable and long-term debt |
|
|
80,449 |
|
|
|
167,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and long-term debt, less current installments |
|
$ |
1,107,195 |
|
|
$ |
1,018,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009, we issued a total of $312.0 million,
seven-year, publicly-registered senior unsecured notes (the 7.750% Senior Notes) at 96.1% of
par, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $300.0 million. The 7.750% Senior Notes mature
on July 15, 2016 and pay interest semiannually on January 15 and July 15. Also, the 7.750%
Senior Notes are our senior unsecured obligations and rank equally with all other existing and
future senior unsecured debt obligations. We are subject to covenants such as limitations on
our and/or our subsidiaries ability to: consolidate or merge with, or convey, transfer or
lease all or substantially all of our assets to, another person; create certain liens; enter
into sale and leaseback transactions; create, incur, issue, assume or guarantee funded debt
(which only applies to our restricted subsidiaries); and guarantee any of our indebtedness
(which only applies to our subsidiaries). We are also subject to a covenant requiring our
repurchase of the 7.750% Senior Notes upon a change of control repurchase event. |
|
(b) |
|
During the second and third quarters of fiscal year 2008, we issued $250.0 million and $150.0
million, respectively, of ten-year, unregistered 8.250% notes at 99.965% of par and 97.5% of
par, respectively, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $245.7 million and $148.5
million, respectively. On July 18, 2008, we completed an exchange whereby all of the
outstanding unregistered 8.250% Notes were exchanged for registered 8.250% Notes (collectively
the 8.250% Senior Notes) that are substantially identical to the unregistered notes except
that the 8.250% Senior Notes are registered under the Securities Act and do not have any
transfer restrictions, registration rights or rights to additional special interest. |
|
|
|
The 8.250% Senior Notes mature on March 15, 2018 and pay interest semiannually on March 15 and
September 15. The interest rate payable on the 8.250% Senior Notes is subject to adjustment
from time to time if the credit ratings assigned to the 8.250% Senior Notes increase or
decrease, as provided in the 8.250% Senior Notes. The 8.250% Senior Notes are our senior
unsecured obligations and rank equally with all other existing and future senior unsecured debt
obligations. |
|
|
|
We are subject to covenants such as limitations on our and/or our subsidiaries ability to:
consolidate or merge with, or convey, transfer or lease all or substantially all of our assets
to, another person; create certain liens; enter into sale and leaseback transactions; create,
incur, issue, assume or guarantee any funded debt (which only applies to our restricted
subsidiaries); and guarantee any of our indebtedness (which only applies to our subsidiaries).
We are also subject to a covenant requiring our repurchase of the 8.250% Senior Notes upon a
change of control repurchase event. |
|
(c) |
|
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2011, we issued the 5.625% Senior Notes at par. The
net proceeds from the offering of $400.0 million were used to fully repay the term portion of
the Old Credit Facility and partially repay amounts outstanding under our foreign asset-backed
securitization program. The 5.625% Senior Notes mature on December 15, 2020. Interest on the
5.625% Senior Notes is payable semiannually on June 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning
on June 15, 2011. The 5.625% Senior Notes are our senior unsecured obligations and rank
equally with all other existing and future senior unsecured debt obligations. We are subject
to covenants such as limitations on our and/or our subsidiaries ability to: consolidate or
merge with, or convey, transfer or lease all or substantially all of our assets to, another
person; create certain liens; enter into sale and leaseback transactions; create, incur,
issue, assume or guarantee any funded debt (which only applies to our restricted
subsidiaries); and guarantee any of our indebtedness (which only applies to our
subsidiaries). We are also subject to a covenant requiring our repurchase of the 5.625% Senior
Notes upon a change of control repurchase event. |
|
(d) |
|
As of May 31, 2011, three of our foreign subsidiaries have entered into credit facilities to
finance their future growth and any corresponding working capital needs. The credit facilities
are denominated in U.S. dollars. The credit facilities incur interest at fixed and variable
rates ranging from 1.82% to 3.6%. |
|
(e) |
|
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2011, we amended and restated the five-year Old
Credit Facility (the Amended and Restated Credit Facility). The Amended and Restated Credit
Facility provides for a revolving credit in the amount of $1.0 billion, subject to potential
uncommitted increases up to $1.3 billion, and expires on December 7, 2015. Some or all of the
lenders under the Amended and Restated Credit Facility and their affiliates have various other
relationships with us and our subsidiaries involving the provision of financial services,
including cash management, loans, letter of credit and bank guarantee facilities, |
43
|
|
|
|
|
investment banking and trust services. We, along with some of our subsidiaries, have entered into foreign
exchange contracts and other derivative arrangements with certain of the lenders and their
affiliates. In addition, many if not most of the agents and lenders under the Amended and
Restated Credit Facility held positions as agent and/or lender under our Old Credit Facility.
Interest and fees on the Amended and Restated Credit Facility advances are based on our
non-credit enhanced long-term senior unsecured debt rating as determined by S&P and Moodys.
Interest is charged at a rate equal to either 0.40% to 1.50% above the base rate or 1.40% to
2.50% above the Eurocurrency rate, where the base rate represents the greatest of Citibank,
N.A.s prime rate, 0.50% above the federal funds rate or 1.0% above one-month LIBOR, and the
Eurocurrency rate represents adjusted London Interbank Offered Rate for the applicable
interest period, each as more fully described in this credit agreement. Fees include a
facility fee based on the revolving credit commitments of the lenders and a letter of credit
fee based on the amount of outstanding letters of credit. We, along with our subsidiaries, are
subject to the following financial covenants: (1) a maximum ratio of (a) Debt (as defined in
the credit agreement) to (b) Consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the credit agreement) and (2)
a minimum ratio of (a) Consolidated EBITDA to (b) interest payable on, and amortization of
debt discount in respect of, all Debt (as defined in the credit agreement) and loss on sale of
trade accounts receivables pursuant to any of our, or our subsidiaries, securitization
programs. In addition, we are subject to other covenants, such as: limitation upon liens;
limitation upon mergers, etc.; limitation upon accounting changes; limitation upon subsidiary
debt; limitation upon sales, etc. of assets; limitation upon changes in nature of business;
payment restrictions affecting subsidiaries; compliance with laws, etc.; payment of taxes,
etc.; maintenance of insurance; preservation of corporate existence, etc.; visitation rights;
keeping of books; maintenance of properties, etc.; transactions with affiliates; and reporting
requirements. |
|
|
|
During the three months ended May 31, 2011, we borrowed and repaid $1.4 billion against the
Amended and Restated Credit Facility under multiple draws. These borrowings were repaid in full
during the third quarter of fiscal year 2011. A draw in the amount of $400.0 million was made
under the term portion of the Old Credit Facility during the fourth quarter of fiscal year
2007, and was repaid in full during the first quarter of fiscal year 2011. |
|
|
|
In addition to the loans described above, at May 31, 2011, we have additional loans outstanding
to fund working capital needs. These additional loans total approximately $2.4 million and are
denominated in Euros. The loans are due and payable within 12 months and are classified as
short-term on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
|
(f) |
|
On May 11, 2011, we amended the foreign asset-backed securitization program. Prior to
execution of the amendment, we recognized interest expense of approximately $0.3 million and
$0.9 million during the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2011, respectively,
associated with the secured borrowings. As a result of the amendment, the accounts receivable
transferred under this program qualify for sale treatment and as such are no longer accounted
for as secured borrowings. |
|
|
|
The program was accounted for as a secured borrowing in fiscal year 2010. At May 31, 2010, we
had $58.1 million of debt outstanding under the program. In addition, we incurred interest
expense of $0.4 million and $1.8 million recorded within the Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Operations during the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2010, respectively. |
|
(g) |
|
This amount represents the fair value hedge accounting adjustment related to the 7.750%
Senior Notes. For further discussion of our fair value hedges, see Note 11 Derivative
Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements. |
At May 31, 2011 and 2010, we were in compliance with all covenants under the Amended and
Restated Credit Facility and our securitization programs.
Our working capital requirements and capital expenditures could continue to increase in order
to support future expansions of our operations through construction of greenfield operations or
acquisitions. It is possible that future expansions may be significant and may require the payment
of cash. Future liquidity needs will also depend on fluctuations in levels of inventory and
shipments, changes in customer order volumes and timing of expenditures for new equipment.
For discussion of our cash management and risk management policies, see Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
We currently anticipate that during the next 12 months, our capital expenditures will be in
the range of $300.0 million to $400.0 million, principally for machinery and equipment for new
business, including new process technology within our DMS segment, maintenance levels of machinery
and equipment and information technology infrastructure upgrades. We believe that our level of
resources, which include cash on hand, available borrowings under our revolving credit facilities,
additional proceeds available under our trade accounts receivable securitization programs and
potentially available under our uncommitted trade accounts receivable sale programs and funds
provided by operations, will be adequate to fund these capital expenditures, the payment of any
declared quarterly dividends, payments for current and future restructuring activities, the
repurchase of $200.0 million worth of our common shares which was authorized by our Board of
Directors in June 2011 and our working capital requirements for the next 12 months. Our $300.0
million asset-backed securitization
program expires in November 2011, our $200.0 million foreign
asset-backed securitization
44
program expires in May 2012 and our $175.0 million uncommitted trade
accounts receivable sale program expires in August 2011, and we may be unable to renew any or all
of them. Our $200.0 million uncommitted trade accounts receivable sale program was amended on May
27, 2011. The terms of the agreement were amended such that the program no longer has a defined
termination date and either party can elect to cancel the agreement at any time with notification.
At May 31, 2011, we had approximately $911.1 million in cash and cash equivalents. As our
growth remains predominately outside of the United States, a significant portion of such cash and
cash equivalents are held by our foreign subsidiaries. We estimate that approximately $238.8
million of the cash and cash equivalents held by our foreign subsidiaries could not be repatriated
to the United States without potential income tax consequences.
Should we desire to consummate significant additional acquisition opportunities or undertake
significant additional expansion activities, our capital needs would increase and could possibly
result in our need to increase available borrowings under our revolving credit facilities or access
public or private debt and equity markets. There can be no assurance, however, that we would be
successful in raising additional debt or equity on terms that we would consider acceptable.
Our contractual obligations for short and long-term debt arrangements, future interest on
notes payable and long-term debt, future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating
lease arrangements, estimated future benefit payments to plan and capital commitments as of May 31,
2011 are summarized below. We do not participate in, or secure financing for, any unconsolidated
limited purpose entities. We generally do not enter into non-cancelable purchase orders for
materials until we receive a corresponding purchase commitment from our customer. Non-cancelable
purchase orders do not typically extend beyond the normal lead time of several weeks at most.
Purchase orders beyond this time frame are typically cancelable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period (in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
year |
|
|
1-3 years |
|
|
4-5 years |
|
|
years |
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,187,644 |
|
|
$ |
80,449 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,107,193 |
|
Future interest on notes payable and long-term debt (a) |
|
|
565,042 |
|
|
|
79,975 |
|
|
|
159,360 |
|
|
|
159,360 |
|
|
|
166,347 |
|
Operating lease obligations |
|
|
207,651 |
|
|
|
62,240 |
|
|
|
70,340 |
|
|
|
39,629 |
|
|
|
35,442 |
|
Estimated future benefit payments to plan |
|
|
52,914 |
|
|
|
4,720 |
|
|
|
9,232 |
|
|
|
13,170 |
|
|
|
25,792 |
|
Capital commitments (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations (c) |
|
$ |
2,013,251 |
|
|
$ |
227,384 |
|
|
$ |
238,934 |
|
|
$ |
212,159 |
|
|
$ |
1,334,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
At May 31, 2011, our notes payable and long-term debt pay interest at predominately fixed
rates. |
|
(b) |
|
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, we committed $10.0 million to an independent
private equity limited partnership which invests in companies that address resource limits in
energy, water and materials (commonly referred to as the CleanTech sector). Of that amount,
we have invested $5.2 million as of May 31, 2011. The remaining commitment of $4.8 million is
callable over the next 27 months by the general partner. As the capital calls have no
specified timing, this commitment has been excluded from the above table as we cannot
currently determine when such commitment calls will occur. |
|
(c) |
|
At May 31, 2011, we have $0.6 million and $86.7 million recorded as a current and a long-term
liability, respectively, for uncertain tax positions. We are not able to reasonably estimate
the timing of payments, or the amount by which our liability for these uncertain tax positions
will increase or decrease over time, and accordingly, this liability has been excluded from
the above table. |
45
Item 3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Foreign Currency Exchange Risks
We transact business in various foreign countries and are, therefore, subject to risk of
foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. We enter into forward contracts to economically hedge
transactional exposure associated with commitments arising from trade accounts receivable, trade
accounts payable, intercompany transactions and fixed purchase obligations denominated in a
currency other than the functional currency of the respective operating entity. We do not intend to
use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. All derivative instruments are
recorded on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at their respective fair values. At May 31,
2011, except for certain foreign currency contracts, with a notional amount outstanding of $176.0
million and a fair value of $3.6 million recorded in prepaid and other current assets and $0.1
million recorded in accrued expenses, we have elected not to prepare and maintain the documentation
required for the transactions to qualify as accounting hedges and, therefore, changes in fair value
are recorded within our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The aggregate notional amount of outstanding contracts at May 31, 2011 that do not qualify as
accounting hedges was $686.9 million. The fair value of these contracts amounted to a $6.3 million
asset recorded in prepaid and other current assets and a $4.6 million liability recorded to accrued
expenses on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The forward contracts will generally expire
in less than four months, with 11 months being the maximum term of the contracts outstanding at May
31, 2011. Upon expiration of the contracts, the change in fair value will be reflected in cost of
revenue within our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The forward contracts are
denominated in Brazilian real, British pounds, Chinese yuan renminbis, Euros, Hungarian forints,
Indian rupees, Japanese yen, Malaysian ringgits, Mexican pesos, Polish zlotys, Russian rubles,
Singapore dollars, Swedish krona and U.S. dollars.
Interest Rate Risk
A portion of our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates to our domestic
investment portfolio. We do not, and do not intend to, use derivative financial instruments for
speculative purposes. We place cash and cash equivalents with various major financial institutions.
We protect our invested principal funds by limiting default risk, market risk and reinvestment
risk. We mitigate these risks by generally investing in investment grade securities and by
frequently positioning the portfolio to try to respond appropriately to a reduction in credit
rating of any investment issuer, guarantor or depository to levels below the credit ratings
dictated by our investment policy. The portfolio typically includes only marketable securities with
active secondary or resale markets to ensure portfolio liquidity. At May 31, 2011, there were no
significant outstanding investments.
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2011, we entered into interest rate swap transactions
with a notional amount of $200.0 million designated as fair value hedges of a portion of our 7.750%
Senior Notes. Under these interest rate swaps, we receive fixed rate interest payments and pay
interest at a variable rate based on LIBOR plus a spread. The effect of these swaps is to convert
fixed rate interest expense on a portion of the 7.750% Senior Notes to floating rate interest
expense. Gains and losses related to changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps are
included in interest expense and offset changes in the fair value of the hedged portion of the
underlying hedged 7.750% Senior Notes. The fair value of the interest rate swaps was $6.7 million
as of May 31, 2011 and was recorded in other assets on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
There were no amounts outstanding at May 31, 2010.
We performed a sensitivity analysis of the interest rate swaps as of May 31, 2011, assuming a
hypothetical 10 percent adverse movement in three-month LIBOR. The analysis indicates that a
hypothetical ten percent adverse movement in three-month LIBOR would not materially impact the fair
value of the interest rates swaps.
We pay interest on several of our outstanding borrowings at interest rates that fluctuate
based upon changes in various base interest rates. There were $78.0 million in borrowings
outstanding under these facilities at May 31, 2011. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources and Note 10 Notes Payable and Long-Term
Debt to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding our
outstanding debt obligations.
Item 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation required by Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act (the
Evaluation), under the supervision and with the participation of our President and Chief
Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act
(Disclosure Controls) as of May 31, 2011. Based on the Evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that
the design and operation of our Disclosure Controls were effective to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i)
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and
forms, and
46
(ii) accumulated and communicated to our senior management, including our CEO and CFO,
to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
For our fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2011, we did not identify any modifications to our
internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Our internal control over financial reporting, including our internal control documentation
and testing efforts, remain ongoing to ensure continued compliance with the Exchange Act. For our
fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2011, we identified certain internal controls that management believed
should be modified to improve them. These improvements include further formalization of policies
and procedures, improved segregation of duties, additional information technology system controls
and additional monitoring controls. We are making improvements to our internal control over
financial reporting as a result of our review efforts. We have reached our conclusions set forth
above, notwithstanding those improvements and modifications.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls and Other Matters
Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls and
internal control over financial reporting will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system,
no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance
that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must
reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be
considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of
fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the
realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of
simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls may be circumvented by the individual acts of some
persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control.
The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the
likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in
achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, a control may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system,
misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Notwithstanding the foregoing limitations on the effectiveness of controls, we have
nonetheless reached the conclusions set forth above on our disclosure controls and procedures and
our internal control over financial reporting.
On February 21, 2011, we entered into an agreement to acquire F-I Holding Company, which
directly or indirectly wholly owns the Competence Sites. The scope of our evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2011 did not include the internal control over
financial reporting of the acquired Competence Sites. From the date that we acquired F-I Holding
Company to May 31, 2011, the processes of the acquired Competence Sites were discrete and did not
significantly impact our internal control over financial reporting.
CEO and CFO Certifications
Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 are the Certifications of the CEO and the CFO, respectively. The
Certifications are required in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the
Section 302 Certifications). This Item of this report, which you are currently reading is the
information concerning the Evaluation referred to in the Section 302 Certifications and this
information should be read in conjunction with the Section 302 Certifications for a more complete
understanding of the topics presented.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are party to certain lawsuits in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that
these proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
47
Item 1A: Risk Factors
As referenced, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes certain forward-looking statements
regarding various matters. The ultimate correctness of those forward-looking statements is
dependent upon a number of known and unknown risks and events, and is subject to various
uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to
be different from those expressed or implied by those statements. Undue reliance should not be
placed on those forward-looking statements. The following important factors, among others, as well
as those factors set forth in our other SEC filings from time to time, could affect future results
and events, causing results and events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in our
forward-looking statements.
Our operating results may fluctuate due to a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control.
Our annual and quarterly operating results are affected by a number of factors, including:
|
|
|
adverse changes in current macro-economic conditions, both in the U.S. and
internationally; |
|
|
|
|
the ongoing situation in Japan, as a result of the recent earthquake and
tsunami, and its effects on our Japanese facility, supply chain, shipping costs,
customers and suppliers; |
|
|
|
|
the level and timing of customer orders; |
|
|
|
|
the level of capacity utilization of our manufacturing facilities and
associated fixed costs; |
|
|
|
|
the composition of the costs of revenue between materials, labor and
manufacturing overhead; |
|
|
|
|
price competition; |
|
|
|
|
changes in demand for our products or services; |
|
|
|
|
changes in demand in our customers end markets; |
|
|
|
|
our exposure to financially troubled customers; |
|
|
|
|
our level of experience in manufacturing a particular product; |
|
|
|
|
the degree of automation used in our assembly process; |
|
|
|
|
the efficiencies achieved in managing inventories and fixed assets; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in materials costs and availability of materials; |
|
|
|
|
adverse changes in political conditions, both in the U.S. and internationally,
including among other things, adverse changes in tax laws and rates (and the
governments interpretations thereof), adverse changes in trade policies and adverse
changes in fiscal and monetary policies; |
|
|
|
|
seasonality in customers product requirements; and |
|
|
|
|
the timing of expenditures in anticipation of increased sales, customer product
delivery requirements and shortages of components or labor. |
The volume and timing of orders placed by our customers vary due to variation in demand for
our customers products; our customers attempts to manage their inventory; electronic design
changes; changes in our customers manufacturing strategies; and acquisitions of or consolidations
among our customers. In addition, our sales associated with consumer related products are subject
to seasonal influences. We may realize greater revenue during our first fiscal quarter due to high
demand for consumer related products during the holiday selling season. In the past, changes in
customer orders that reduce net revenue have had a significant effect on our results of operations
as a result of our overhead remaining relatively fixed while our net revenue decreased. Any one or
a combination of these factors could adversely affect our annual and quarterly results of
operations in the future. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations Results of Operations.
Because we depend on a limited number of customers, a reduction in sales to any one of our
customers could cause a significant decline in our revenue.
For the nine months ended May 31, 2011, our five largest customers accounted for approximately
48% of our net revenue and our top 48 customers accounted for approximately 90% of our net revenue.
We currently depend, and expect to continue to depend, upon a relatively small number of customers
for a significant percentage of our net revenue and upon their growth, viability and financial
stability. If any of our customers experience a decline in the demand for their products due to
economic or other forces, they may reduce their purchases from us or terminate their relationship
with us. Our customers industries have experienced rapid technological change, shortening of
product life cycles, consolidation, and pricing and margin pressures. Consolidation among our
customers may further reduce the number of customers that generate a significant percentage of our
net revenue and exposes us to
48
increased risks relating to dependence on a small number of
customers. A significant reduction in sales to any of our customers or a customer exerting
significant pricing and margin pressures on us could have a material adverse effect on our results
of operations. In the past, some of our customers have terminated their manufacturing arrangements
with us or have significantly reduced or delayed the volume of design, production or product
management services ordered from us, including moving a portion of their manufacturing from us in
order to more fully utilize their excess internal manufacturing capacity.
Our revenues declined in fiscal year 2009 as consumers and businesses postponed spending in
response to tighter credit, negative financial news, declines in income or asset values or general
uncertainty about global economic conditions. These economic conditions had a negative impact on
our results of operations over this period and similar conditions may exist in the future. In
addition, some of our customers moved a portion of their manufacturing from us in order to more
fully utilize their excess internal manufacturing capacity. We cannot assure you that present or
future customers will not terminate their design, production and product management services
arrangements with us or significantly change, reduce or delay the amount of services ordered from
us. If they do, it could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. In addition,
we generate significant accounts receivable in connection with providing design, production and
product management services to our customers. If one or more of our customers were to become
insolvent (which two of our customers experienced in fiscal year 2009) or otherwise were unable to
pay for the services provided by us on a timely basis, or at all, our operating results and
financial condition could be adversely affected. In addition, our operating results and financial
condition could be adversely affected by the potential recovery by the bankruptcy estate of amounts
previously paid to us by a customer that later became insolvent that are deemed a preference under
bankruptcy law. Such adverse effects could include one or more of the following: a decline in
revenue, a charge for bad debts, a charge for inventory write-offs, a decrease in inventory turns,
an increase in days in inventory and an increase in days in trade accounts receivable.
Certain of the industries to which we provide services have recently experienced
significant financial difficulty, with some of the participants filing for bankruptcy. Such
significant financial difficulty has negatively affected our business and, if further experienced
by one or more of our customers, may further negatively affect our business due to the decreased
demand of these financially distressed customers, the potential inability of these companies to
make full payment on amounts owed to us, or both. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Risk Factors We face certain risks in
collecting our trade accounts receivable.
Consolidation in industries that utilize electronics components may adversely affect our business.
Consolidation in industries that utilize electronics components may further increase as
companies combine to achieve further economies of scale and other synergies, which could result in
an increase in excess manufacturing capacity as companies seek to divest manufacturing operations
or eliminate duplicative product lines. Excess manufacturing capacity may increase pricing and
competitive pressures for our industry as a whole and for us in particular. Consolidation could
also result in an increasing number of very large companies offering products in multiple
industries. The significant purchasing power and market power of these large companies could
increase pricing and competitive pressures for us. If one of our customers is acquired by another
company that does not rely on us to provide services and has its own production facilities or
relies on another provider of similar services, we may lose that customers business. Such
consolidation among our customers may further reduce the number of customers that generate a
significant percentage of our net revenue and exposes us to increased risks relating to dependence
on a small number of customers. Any of the foregoing results of industry consolidation could
adversely affect our business.
Our customers face numerous competitive challenges, such as decreasing demand from their customers,
rapid technological change and short life cycles for their products, which may materially adversely
affect their business, and also ours.
Factors affecting the industries that utilize electronics components in general, and our
customers specifically, could seriously harm our customers and, as a result, us. These factors
include:
|
|
|
recessionary periods in our customers markets; |
|
|
|
|
the inability of our customers to adapt to rapidly changing technology and
evolving industry standards, which contributes to short product life cycles; |
|
|
|
|
the inability of our customers to develop and market their products, some of
which are new and untested; |
|
|
|
|
the potential that our customers products become obsolete; |
|
|
|
|
the failure of our customers products to gain widespread commercial
acceptance; |
|
|
|
|
increased competition among our customers and their respective competitors
which may result in a loss of business, or a reduction in pricing power, for our
customers; and |
|
|
|
|
new product offerings by our customers competitors may prove to be more
successful than our customers product offerings. |
49
At times our customers have been, and may be in the future, unsuccessful in addressing these
competitive challenges, or any others that they may face, and their business has been, and may be
in the future, materially adversely affected. As a result, the demand for our services has at times
declined and may decline in the future. Even if our customers are successful in responding to these
challenges, their responses may have consequences which affect our business relationships with our
customers (and possibly our results of operations) by altering our production cycles and inventory
management.
The success of our business is dependent on both our ability to independently keep pace with
technological changes and competitive conditions in our industry, and also our ability to
effectively adapt our services in response to our customers keeping pace with technological changes
and competitive conditions in their respective industries.
If we are unable to offer technologically advanced, cost effective, quick response
manufacturing services, demand for our services will decline. In addition, if we are unable to
offer services in response to our customers changing requirements, then demand for our services
will also decline. A substantial portion of our net revenue is derived from our offering of
complete service solutions for our customers. For example, if we fail to maintain high-quality
design and engineering services, our net revenue may significantly decline.
Most of our customers do not commit to long-term production schedules, which makes it difficult for
us to schedule production and capital expenditures, and to maximize the efficiency of our
manufacturing capacity.
The volume and timing of sales to our customers may vary due to:
|
|
|
variation in demand for our customers products; |
|
|
|
|
our customers attempts to manage their inventory; |
|
|
|
|
electronic design changes; |
|
|
|
|
changes in our customers manufacturing strategy; and |
|
|
|
|
acquisitions of or consolidations among customers. |
Due in part to these factors, most of our customers do not commit to firm production schedules
for more than one quarter. Our inability to forecast the level of customer orders with certainty
makes it difficult to schedule production and maximize utilization of manufacturing capacity. In the past, we
have been required to increase staffing and other expenses in order to meet the anticipated demand
of our customers. Anticipated orders from many of our customers have, in the past, failed to
materialize or delivery schedules have been deferred as a result of changes in our customers
business needs, thereby adversely affecting our results of operations. On other occasions, our
customers have required rapid increases in production, which have placed an excessive burden on our
resources. Such customer order fluctuations and deferrals have had a material adverse effect on us
in the past and we may experience such effects in the future. See Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
In addition to our difficulty in forecasting customer orders, we sometimes experience
difficulty forecasting the timing of our receipt of revenue and earnings following commencement of
manufacturing an additional product for new or existing customers. The necessary process to begin
this commencement of manufacturing can take from several months to more than a year before
production begins. Delays in the completion of this process can delay the timing of our sales and
related earnings. In addition, because we make capital expenditures during this ramping process
and do not typically recognize revenue until after we produce and ship the customers products, any
delays or unanticipated costs in the ramping process may have a significant adverse effect on our
cash flows and our results of operations.
Our customers may cancel their orders, change production quantities, delay production or change
their sourcing strategy.
Our industry must provide increasingly rapid product turnaround for its customers. We
generally do not obtain firm, long-term purchase commitments from our customers and we continue to
experience reduced lead-times in customer orders. Customers have previously canceled their orders,
changed production quantities, delayed production and changed their sourcing strategy for a number
of reasons, and may do one or more of these in the future. Such changes, delays and cancellations
have led to, and may lead in the future to a decline in our production and our possession of excess
or obsolete inventory which we may not be able to sell to the customer or a third party. This has
resulted in, and could result in future additional, write downs of inventories that have become
obsolete or exceed anticipated demand or net realizable value.
The success of our customers products in the market affects our business. Cancellations,
reductions, delays or changes in sourcing strategy by a significant customer or by a group of
customers have negatively impacted, and could further negatively impact in the future, our
operating results by reducing the number of products that we sell, delaying the payment to us for
inventory that we purchased and reducing the use of our manufacturing facilities which have
associated fixed costs not dependent on our level of revenue.
50
In addition, we make significant decisions, including determining the levels of business that
we will seek and accept, production schedules, component procurement commitments, personnel needs
and other resource requirements, based on our estimate of customer requirements. The following
factors, among others, reduce our ability to accurately estimate future customer requirements: the
short-term nature of our customers commitments; their uncertainty about, among other things,
future economic conditions and other events such as the ongoing situation in Japan (as a result of
the recent earthquake and tsunami); and the possibility of rapid changes in demand for their
products. In addition, uncertainty about future economic conditions makes it difficult to forecast
operating results and make production planning decisions about future periods.
On occasion, customers may require rapid increases in production, which can stress our
resources and reduce operating margins. In addition, because many of our costs and operating
expenses are relatively fixed, a reduction in customer demand can harm our gross profits and
operating results.
We depend on a limited number of suppliers for components that are critical to our manufacturing
processes. A shortage of these components or an increase in their price could interrupt our
operations and reduce our profits, increase our inventory carrying costs, increase our risk of
exposure to inventory obsolescence and cause us to purchase components of a lesser quality.
Most of our significant long-term customer contracts permit quarterly or other periodic
adjustments to pricing based on decreases and increases in component prices and other factors;
however, we typically bear the risk of component price increases that occur between any such re-pricings or, if such
re-pricing is not permitted, during the balance of the term of the particular customer contract.
Accordingly, certain component price increases could adversely affect our gross profit margins.
Almost all of the products we manufacture require one or more components that are only available
from a single source. Some of these components are allocated from time to time in response to
supply shortages. In some cases, supply shortages will substantially curtail production of all
assemblies using a particular component. A supply shortage can also increase our cost of goods
sold, as a result of our having to pay higher prices for components in limited supply, and cause us
to have to redesign or reconfigure products to accommodate a substitute component. In addition, at
various times industry-wide shortages of electronic components have occurred, particularly of
semiconductor, relay and capacitor products. We believe these past shortages were due to increased
economic activity following recessionary conditions. We are currently evaluating whether the recent
earthquake and tsunami in Japan will result in component shortages. In the past, such
circumstances have produced insignificant levels of short-term interruption of our operations, but
could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in the future. Our production of
a customers product could be negatively impacted by any quality or reliability issues with any of
our component suppliers. The financial condition of our suppliers could affect their ability to
supply us with components which could have a material adverse effect on our operations.
In addition, if a component shortage is threatened or we anticipate one, we may purchase such
component early to avoid a delay or interruption in our operations. A possible result of such an
early purchase is that we may incur additional inventory carrying costs, for which we may not be
compensated, and have a heightened risk of exposure to inventory obsolescence, the cost of which
may not be recoverable from our customers. Such costs would adversely affect our gross profit and
net income. A component shortage may also require us to look to second tier vendors or to procure
components through brokers with whom we are not familiar. These components may be of lesser quality
than those weve historically purchased and could cause us to incur costs to bring such components
up to our typical quality levels or to replace defective ones. See Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Business Components Procurement
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010.
Introducing programs requiring implementation of new competencies, including new process technology
within our mechanical operations, could affect our operations and financial results.
The introduction of programs requiring implementation of new competencies, including new
process technology within our mechanical operations, presents challenges in addition to
opportunities. Deployment of such programs may require us to invest significant resources and
capital in facilities, equipment and/or personnel. We may not meet our customers expectations or
otherwise execute properly or in a cost-efficient manner, which could damage our customer
relationships and result in remedial costs or the loss of our invested capital and anticipated
revenues and profits. In addition, there are risks of market acceptance and product performance
that could result in less demand than anticipated and our having excess capacity. The failure to
ensure that our agreed terms appropriately reflect the anticipated costs, risks, and rewards of
such an opportunity could adversely affect our profitability. If we do not meet one or more of
these challenges, our operations and financial results could be adversely affected.
Customer relationships with emerging companies may present more risks than with established
companies.
Customer relationships with emerging companies present special risks because such companies do
not have an extensive product history. As a result, there is less demonstration of market
acceptance of their products making it harder for us to anticipate needs and requirements than with
established customers. In addition, due to the current economic environment, additional funding for
51
such companies may be more difficult to obtain and these customer relationships may not continue or
materialize to the extent we planned or we previously experienced. This tightening of financing for
start-up customers, together with many start-up customers lack of prior operations and unproven
product markets increase our credit risk, especially in trade accounts receivable and inventories.
Although we perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and adjust our allowance for
doubtful accounts receivable for all customers, including start-up customers, based on the information available, these allowances may not be adequate. This
risk may exist for any new emerging company customers in the future.
We compete with numerous other electronic manufacturing services and design providers and others,
including our current and potential customers who may decide to manufacture some or all of their
products internally.
Our business is highly competitive. We compete against numerous domestic and foreign
electronic manufacturing services and design providers, including Benchmark Electronics, Inc.,
Celestica, Inc., Flextronics International Ltd., Hon-Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd., Plexus Corp.
and Sanmina-SCI Corporation. In addition, past consolidation in our industry has resulted in larger
and more geographically diverse competitors who have significant combined resources with which to
compete against us. Also, we may in the future encounter competition from other large electronic
manufacturers, and manufacturers that are focused solely on design and manufacturing services, that
are selling, or may begin to sell electronics manufacturing services. Most of our competitors have
international operations and significant financial resources and some have substantially greater
manufacturing, R&D and marketing resources than us. These competitors may:
|
|
|
respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies; |
|
|
|
|
have greater name recognition, critical mass and geographic market presence; |
|
|
|
|
be better able to take advantage of acquisition opportunities; |
|
|
|
|
adapt more quickly to changes in customer requirements; |
|
|
|
|
devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of their
services; |
|
|
|
|
be better positioned to compete on price for their services, as a result of any
combination of lower labor costs, lower components costs, lower facilities costs or
lower operating costs; and |
|
|
|
|
have excess capacity, and be better able to utilize such excess capacity which
may reduce the cost of their product or service. |
We also face competition from the manufacturing operations of our current and potential
customers, who are continually evaluating the merits of manufacturing products internally against
the advantages of outsourcing. In the past, some of our customers moved a portion of their
manufacturing from us in order to more fully utilize their excess internal manufacturing capacity.
We may be operating at a cost disadvantage compared to competitors who have greater direct
buying power from component suppliers, distributors and raw material suppliers or who have lower
cost structures as a result of their geographic location or the services they provide or who are
willing to make sales or provide services at lower margins than us (including relationships where
our competitors are willing to accept a lower margin from certain of their customers for whom they
perform other higher margin business). As a result, competitors may procure a competitive advantage
and obtain business from our customers. Our manufacturing processes are generally not subject to
significant proprietary protection. In addition, companies with greater resources or a greater
market presence may enter our market or increase their competition with us. We also expect our
competitors to continue to improve the performance of their current products or services, to reduce
the sales prices of their current products or services and to introduce new products or services
that may offer greater performance and improved pricing. Any of these developments could cause a
decline in our sales, loss of market acceptance of our products or services, compression of our
profits or loss of our market share.
The economies of the U.S., Europe and certain countries in Asia are, or have recently been, in a
recession.
There was an erosion of global consumer confidence amidst concerns over declining asset
values, inflation, volatility in energy costs, geopolitical issues, the availability and cost of
credit, high unemployment, and the stability and solvency of financial institutions, financial
markets, businesses, and sovereign nations. These concerns slowed global economic growth and
resulted in recessions in many countries, including in the U.S., Europe and certain countries in
Asia. Even though we have seen signs of an overall economic recovery beginning to take place and the National Bureau of Economic
Research declared that the U.S. recession ended in June, 2009, such recovery may be weak and/or
short-lived. Recessionary conditions may return. If any of these potential negative, or less than
positive, economic conditions occur, a number of negative effects on our business could result,
including customers or potential customers reducing or delaying orders, increased pricing
pressures, the insolvency of key suppliers, which could result in production delays, the inability
of customers to obtain credit, and the insolvency of one or more customers. Thus, these economic
conditions (1) could negatively impact our ability to (a) forecast customer demand, (b) effectively
manage inventory levels and (c) collect receivables; (2) could increase our need for cash; and (3)
have decreased our net revenue and profitability and negatively impacted the value of certain of
our properties and other assets. Depending on the length of time that these conditions exist, they
may cause future additional negative effects, including some of those listed above.
52
The financial markets have recently experienced significant turmoil, which may adversely affect
financial arrangements we may need to enter into, refinance or repay.
The effects of the recent credit market turmoil could negatively impact the counterparties to
our forward exchange contracts and trade accounts receivable securitization and sale programs; our
lenders under the Amended and Restated Credit Facility; and our lenders under various foreign
subsidiary credit facilities. These potential negative impacts could potentially limit our ability
to borrow under these financing agreements, contracts, facilities and programs. In addition, if we
attempt to obtain future additional financing, such as renewing or refinancing our $300.0 million
asset-backed securitization program expiring on November 4, 2011, our $200.0 million foreign
asset-backed securitization program expiring on May 10, 2012, our $175.0 million uncommitted trade
accounts receivable sale program expiring on August 24, 2011 or our $200.0 million uncommitted
trade accounts receivable sale program (this program does not have a defined termination date and
either party can elect to cancel the program at any time with notification), the effects of the
recent credit market turmoil could negatively impact our ability to obtain such financing.
Finally, the credit market turmoil has negatively impacted certain of our customers and certain of
their customers. These impacts could have several consequences which could have a negative effect
on our results of operations, including one or more of the following: a negative impact on our
liquidity; a decrease in demand for our services; a decrease in demand for our customers products;
and bad debt charges or inventory write-offs.
Our business could be adversely affected by any delays, or increased costs, resulting from issues
that our common carriers are dealing with in transporting our materials, our products, or both.
We rely on a variety of common carriers to transport our materials from our suppliers to us,
and to transport our products from us to our customers. Problems suffered by any of these common
carriers, whether due to a natural disaster, labor problem, increased energy prices or some other
issue, could result in shipping delays, increased costs, or some other supply chain disruption, and
could therefore have a material adverse effect on our operations.
We derive a majority of our revenue from our international operations, which may be subject to a
number of risks and often require more management time and expense to achieve profitability than
our domestic operations.
We derived 85.8% and 85.7% of net revenue from international operations for the three months
and nine months ended May 31, 2011, respectively, compared to 84.3% and 84.5% for the three months
and nine months ended May 31, 2010, respectively. We currently expect our foreign source revenue to
slightly increase as compared to current levels over the course of the next 12 months. At May 31,
2011, we operate outside the U.S. in Vienna, Austria; Hasselt, Belgium; Belo Horizonte, Manaus and
Sorocaba, Brazil; Beijing, Huangpu, Nanjing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Suzhou, Tianjin, Wuxi and Yantai,
China; Coventry, England; Brest, Gallargues, France; Jena, Germany; Szombathely and Tiszaujvaros,
Hungary; Pune, Mumbai and Ranjangaon, India; Dublin, Ireland; Bergamo, Cassina de Pecchi and
Marcianise Italy; Gotemba, Hachiouji and Tokyo, Japan; Penang, Malaysia; Chihuahua, Guadalajara,
Nogales and Reynosa, Mexico; Amsterdam, Eindhoven and Venray, The Netherlands; Bydgoszcz and
Kwidzyn, Poland; Tver, Russia; Ayr and Livingston, Scotland; Alexandra, Tampines and Toa Payoh,
Singapore; Hsinchu, Taichung and Taipei, Taiwan; Ankara, Turkey; Uzhgorod, Ukraine and Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. We
continually consider additional opportunities to make foreign acquisitions and construct and open
new foreign facilities. Our international operations are, have been and may be subject to a number
of risks, including:
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations; |
|
|
|
|
less flexible employee relationships which can be difficult and expensive to
terminate; |
|
|
|
|
labor unrest and dissatisfaction, including increased scrutiny of the labor
practices (including but not limited to working conditions, compliance with employment
and labor laws and compensation) of us and others in our industry by the media and
other third parties, which may result in further scrutiny and allegations of
violations, more stringent and burdensome labor laws and regulations, higher labor
costs, and/or loss of revenues if our customers become dissatisfied with our labor
practices and diminish or terminate their relationship with us; |
|
|
|
|
burdens of complying with a wide variety of labor practices and foreign laws,
including those relating to export and import duties, environmental policies and
privacy issues; |
|
|
|
|
rising labor costs, in particular within the lower-cost regions in which
we operate, which could adversely impact our operating results if we are unable to
recover such costs in our pricing to our customers; |
|
|
|
|
political and economic instability (including acts of terrorism, widespread
criminal activities and outbreaks of war); |
|
|
|
|
inadequate infrastructure for our operations (e.g., lack of adequate power,
water, transportation and raw materials); |
|
|
|
|
health concerns and related government actions; |
|
|
|
|
coordinating our communications and logistics across geographic distances and
multiple time zones; |
|
|
|
|
risk of governmental expropriation of our property; |
53
|
|
|
less favorable, or relatively undefined, intellectual property laws; |
|
|
|
|
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements and laws or government or
judicial interpretations of such regulatory requirements and laws; |
|
|
|
|
longer customer payment cycles and difficulty collecting trade accounts
receivable; |
|
|
|
|
domestic and foreign export control laws, including the International Traffic in
Arms Regulations and the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), regulation by the
United States Department of Commerces Bureau of Industry and Security under the EAR, as
well as additional export duties, import controls and trade barriers (including quotas); |
|
|
|
|
adverse trade policies, and adverse changes to any of the policies of either
the U.S. or any of the foreign jurisdictions in which we operate; |
|
|
|
|
adverse changes in tax rates; |
|
|
|
|
adverse changes to the manner in which the U.S. taxes U.S.-based multinational
companies or interprets its tax laws; |
|
|
|
|
legal or political constraints on our ability to maintain or increase prices; |
|
|
|
|
governmental restrictions on the transfer of funds to us from our operations
outside the U.S.; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates, which could affect local payroll and
other expenses; |
|
|
|
|
inability to utilize net operating losses incurred by our foreign operations
against future income in the same jurisdiction; and |
|
|
|
|
economies that are emerging or developing , that may be subject to greater
currency volatility, negative growth, high inflation, limited availability of foreign
exchange and other risks. |
These factors may harm our results of operations, and any measures that we may implement
to reduce the effect of volatile currencies and other risks of our international operations may not
be effective. In our experience, entry into new international markets requires considerable
management time as well as start-up expenses for market development, hiring and establishing
facilities before any significant revenue is generated. As a result, initial operations in a new
market may operate at low margins or may be unprofitable. See Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Another significant legal risk resulting from our international operations is compliance with
the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). In many foreign countries, particularly in those
with developing economies, it may be a local custom that businesses operating in such countries
engage in business practices that are prohibited by the FCPA or other U.S. laws and regulations.
Although we have implemented policies and procedures designed to cause compliance with the FCPA and
similar laws, there can be no assurance that all of our employees, and agents, as well as those
companies to which we outsource certain of our business operations, will not take actions in
violation of our policies. Any such violation, even if prohibited by our policies, could have a
material adverse effect on our business.
If we do not manage our growth effectively, our profitability could decline.
Areas of our business at times experience periods of rapid growth which can place considerable
additional demands upon our management team and our operational, financial and management
information systems. Our ability to manage growth effectively requires us to continue to implement
and improve these systems; avoid cost overruns; maintain customer, supplier and other favorable
business relationships during possible transition periods; continue to develop the management
skills of our managers and supervisors; adapt relatively quickly to new markets or technologies and
continue to train, motivate and manage our employees. Our failure to effectively manage growth
could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. See Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
We have on occasion not achieved, and may not in the future achieve, expected profitability from
our acquisitions.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully integrate the operations and
management of our recent acquisitions. Similarly, we cannot assure you that we will be able to (1)
identify future strategic acquisitions, (2) consummate these potential acquisitions on favorable
terms, if at all, or (3) if consummated, successfully integrate the operations and management of
future acquisitions. Acquisitions involve significant risks, which could have a material adverse
effect on us including:
|
|
|
Financial risks, such as (1) the payment of a purchase price that exceeds the
future value that we may realize from the acquired operations and businesses; (2) an
increase in our expenses and working capital requirements, which could reduce our
return on invested capital; (3) potential known and unknown liabilities of the acquired
businesses; (4) costs associated with integrating acquired operations and businesses;
(5) the dilutive effect of the issuance of any additional equity securities we issue as
consideration for, or to finance, the acquisition; (6) the incurrence of additional
debt; (7) the |
54
|
|
|
financial impact of incorrectly valuing goodwill and other intangible
assets involved in any acquisitions, potential future impairment write-downs of
goodwill and indefinite life intangibles and the amortization of other intangible
assets; (8) possible adverse tax and accounting effects; and (9) the risk that we spend
substantial amounts purchasing these manufacturing facilities and assume significant
contractual and other obligations with no guaranteed levels of revenue or that we may
have to close or sell acquired facilities at our cost, which may include substantial
employee severance costs and asset write-offs, which have resulted, and may result, in
our incurring significant losses. |
|
|
|
|
Operating risks, such as (1) the diversion of managements attention to the
assimilation of the acquired businesses; (2) the risk that the acquired businesses will
fail to maintain the quality of services that we have historically provided; (3) the
need to implement financial and other systems and add management resources; (4) the
need to maintain customer, supplier or other favorable business relationships of
acquired operations and restructure or terminate unfavorable relationships; (5) the potential
for deficiencies in internal controls of
the acquired operations; (6) we may not be able to attract and retain the employees
necessary to support the acquired businesses; (7) unforeseen difficulties (including any
unanticipated liabilities) in the acquired operations; and (8) the impact on us of any
unionized work force we may acquire or any labor disruptions that might occur. |
Most of our acquisitions involve operations outside of the U.S. which are subject to various
risks including those described in Risk Factors We derive a majority of our revenue from our
international operations, which may be subject to a number of risks and often require more
management time and expense to achieve profitability than our domestic operations.
We have acquired and may continue to pursue the acquisition of manufacturing and supply chain
management operations from our customers (or potential customers). In these acquisitions, the
divesting company will typically enter into a supply arrangement with the acquirer. Therefore, our
competitors often also pursue these acquisitions. In addition, certain divesting companies may
choose not to offer to sell their operations to us because of our current supply arrangements with
other companies or may require terms and conditions that may impact our profitability. If we are
unable to attract and consummate some of these acquisition opportunities at favorable terms, our
growth and profitability could be adversely impacted.
In addition to those risks listed above, arrangements entered into with these divesting
companies typically involve certain other risks, including the following:
|
|
|
the integration into our business of the acquired assets and facilities may be
time-consuming and costly; |
|
|
|
|
we, rather than the divesting company, may bear the risk of excess capacity; |
|
|
|
|
we may not achieve anticipated cost reductions and efficiencies; |
|
|
|
|
we may be unable to meet the expectations of the divesting company as to
volume, product quality, timeliness, pricing requirements and cost reductions; and |
|
|
|
|
if demand for the divesting companys products declines, it may reduce their
volume of purchases and we may not be able to sufficiently reduce the expenses of
operating the facility we acquired from them or use such facility to provide services
to other customers. |
In addition, when acquiring manufacturing operations, we may receive limited commitments to
firm production schedules. Accordingly, in these circumstances, we may spend substantial amounts
purchasing these manufacturing facilities and assume significant contractual and other obligations
with no or insufficient guaranteed levels of revenue. We may also not achieve expected
profitability from these arrangements. As a result of these and other risks, these outsourcing
opportunities may not be profitable.
We have expanded the primary scope of our acquisitions strategy beyond acquiring the
manufacturing assets of our customers and potential customers to include manufacturing service
providers with business plans similar to ours and companies with certain key technologies and
capabilities that complement and support our other current business activities. The amount and
scope of the risks associated with acquisitions of this type extend beyond those that we have
traditionally faced in making acquisitions. These extended risks include greater uncertainties in
the financial benefits and potential liabilities associated with this expanded base of
acquisitions.
We face risks arising from the restructuring of our operations.
Over the past few years, we have undertaken initiatives to restructure our business operations
with the intention of improving utilization and realizing cost savings in the future. These
initiatives have included changing the number and location of our production facilities, largely to
align our capacity and infrastructure with current and anticipated customer demand. This alignment
includes transferring programs from higher cost geographies to lower cost geographies. The process
of restructuring entails, among other activities, moving production between facilities, closing
facilities, reducing the level of staff, realigning our business processes and reorganizing our
management.
We continuously evaluate our operations and cost structure relative to general economic
conditions, market demands, cost competitiveness and our geographic footprint as it relates to our
customers production requirements. As a result of this ongoing
55
evaluation, we initiated the 2006
Restructuring Plan and the 2009 Restructuring Plan. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations Results of Operations Restructuring and
Impairment Charges for further details. If we incur unexpected restructuring charges related to
the 2006 Restructuring Plan, the 2009 Restructuring Plan, or both, or in connection with any
potential future restructuring program, our financial condition and results of operations may
suffer. We expect that in the future we may continue to transfer certain of our operations to lower
cost geographies, which may require us to take additional restructuring charges. We also may decide
to transfer certain operations to other geographies based on changes in our customers
requirements, the tax rates in the jurisdictions in which we operate or other factors.
Restructurings present significant potential risks of events occurring that could adversely affect
us, including a decrease in employee morale, delays encountered in finalizing the scope of, and
implementing, the restructurings (including extensive consultations concerning potential workforce
reductions, particularly in locations outside of the U.S.), the failure to achieve targeted cost
savings and the failure to meet operational targets and customer requirements due to the loss of
employees and any work stoppages that might occur. These risks are further complicated by our
extensive international operations, which subject us to different legal and regulatory requirements
that govern the extent and speed, of our ability to reduce our manufacturing capacity and
workforce. In addition, the current global economic conditions may change how governments regulate
restructuring as the recent global recession has impacted local economies. Finally, we may have to
obtain agreements from our affected customers for the re-location of our facilities in certain
instances. Obtaining these agreements, along with the volatility in our customers demand, can
further delay restructuring activities.
We may not be able to maintain our engineering, technological and manufacturing process expertise.
The markets for our manufacturing and engineering services are characterized by rapidly
changing technology and evolving process development. The continued success of our business will
depend upon our ability to:
|
|
|
hire, retain and expand our qualified engineering and technical personnel; |
|
|
|
|
maintain our technological expertise; |
|
|
|
|
develop and market manufacturing services that meet changing customer needs;
and |
|
|
|
|
successfully anticipate or respond to technological changes in manufacturing
processes on a cost-effective and timely basis. |
Although we believe that our operations use the assembly and testing technologies, equipment
and processes that are currently required by our customers, we cannot be certain that we will
develop the capabilities required by our customers in the future. The emergence of new technology,
industry standards or customer requirements may render our equipment, inventory or processes
obsolete or noncompetitive. In addition, we may have to acquire new assembly and testing
technologies and equipment to remain competitive. The acquisition and implementation of new
technologies and equipment may require significant expense or capital investment, which could
reduce our operating margins and our operating results. In facilities that we establish or acquire,
we may not be able to maintain our engineering, technological and manufacturing process expertise.
Our failure to anticipate and adapt to our customers changing technological needs and requirements
or to hire and retain a sufficient number of engineers and maintain our engineering, technological
and manufacturing expertise, could have a material adverse effect on our business.
If our manufacturing processes and services do not comply with applicable statutory and regulatory
requirements, or if we manufacture products containing design or manufacturing defects, demand for
our services may decline and we may be subject to liability claims.
We manufacture and design products to our customers specifications, and, in some cases, our
manufacturing processes and facilities may need to comply with applicable statutory and regulatory
requirements. For example, medical devices that we manufacture or design, as well as the facilities
and manufacturing processes that we use to produce them, are regulated by the Food and Drug
Administration and non-U.S. counterparts of this agency. Similarly, items we manufacture for
customers in the defense and aerospace industries, as well as the processes we use to produce them,
are regulated by the Department of Defense and the Federal Aviation Authority. In addition, our
customers products and the manufacturing processes that we use to produce them often are highly
complex. As a result, products that we manufacture may at times contain manufacturing or design
defects, and our manufacturing processes may be subject to errors or not be in compliance with
applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. Defects in the products we manufacture or design,
whether caused by a design, manufacturing or component failure or error, or deficiencies in our
manufacturing processes, may result in delayed shipments to customers or reduced or canceled
customer orders. If these defects or deficiencies are significant, our business reputation may also
be damaged. The failure of the products that we manufacture or our manufacturing processes and
facilities to comply with applicable statutory and regulatory requirements may subject us to legal
fines or penalties and, in some cases, require us to shut down or incur considerable expense to
correct a manufacturing process or facility. In addition, these defects may result in liability
claims against us or expose us to liability to pay for the recall of a product. The magnitude of
such claims may increase as we expand our medical and aerospace and defense manufacturing services,
as defects in medical devices and aerospace and defense systems could seriously harm or kill users
of these products and others. Even if our customers are responsible for the defects, they may not,
or may not have resources to, assume responsibility for any costs or liabilities arising from these
defects, which could expose us to additional liability claims.
56
Our regular manufacturing processes and services may result in exposure to intellectual property
infringement and other claims.
Providing manufacturing services can expose us to potential claims that the product design or
manufacturing processes infringe third party intellectual property rights. Even though many of our
manufacturing services contracts generally require our customers to indemnify us for infringement
claims relating to their products, including associated product specifications and designs, a
particular customer may not, or may not have the resources to assume responsibility for such
claims. In addition, we may be responsible for claims that our manufacturing processes or
components used in manufacturing infringe third party intellectual property rights. Infringement
claims could subject us to significant liability for damages, and potentially injunctive action, or
hamper our normal operations such as by interfering with the availability of components and,
regardless of merits, could be time-consuming and expensive to resolve.
Our design services and turnkey solutions offerings may result in additional exposure to product
liability, intellectual property infringement and other claims, in addition to the business risk of
being unable to produce the revenues necessary to profit from these services.
We continue our efforts to offer certain design services, primarily those relating to products
that we manufacture for our customers, and we also continue to offer design services related to
collaborative design manufacturing. We also offer turnkey solutions for the design and manufacture
of end-user products and components as well as related services. Providing such products and
services can expose us to different or greater potential liabilities than those we face when
providing our regular manufacturing services, including an increase in exposure to potential
product liability claims resulting from injuries caused by defects in products we design, as well
as potential claims that products we design or process, or components we use, infringe third party
intellectual property rights. Such claims could subject us to significant liability for damages,
subject the infringing portion of our business to injunction and, regardless of their merits, could
be time-consuming and expensive to resolve. We also may have greater potential exposure from
warranty claims and from product recalls due to problems caused by product design. Costs associated
with possible product liability claims, intellectual property infringement claims and product
recalls could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. When providing
collaborative design manufacturing or turnkey solutions, we may not be guaranteed revenue needed to
recoup or profit from the investment in the resources necessary to design and develop products or
provide services. No revenue may be generated from these efforts, particularly if our customers do
not approve the designs in a timely manner or at all, or if they do not then purchase anticipated
levels of products. Furthermore, contracts may allow the customer to delay or cancel deliveries and
may not obligate the customer to any volume of purchases, or may provide for penalties or
cancellation of orders if we are late in delivering designs or products. We may also have the
responsibility to ensure that products we design or offer satisfy safety and regulatory standards and to obtain any necessary certifications. Failure to timely
obtain the necessary approvals or certifications could prevent us from selling these products,
which in turn could harm our sales, profitability and reputation.
In our contracts with turnkey solutions customers, we generally provide them with a warranty
against defects in our designs. If a turnkey solutions product or component that we design is found
to be defective in its design, this may lead to increased warranty claims. Warranty claims may also
extend to defects caused by components or materials used in the products but which are provided to
us by our suppliers. Although we have product liability insurance coverage, it may not be
available on acceptable terms, in sufficient amounts, or at all. A successful product liability
claim in excess of our insurance coverage or any material claim for which insurance coverage was
denied or limited and for which indemnification was not available could have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Moreover, even if the claim
relates to a defect caused by a supplier, we may not be able to get an adequate remedy from the
supplier.
The success of our turnkey solution activities depends in part on our ability to obtain, protect
and leverage intellectual property rights to our designs.
We strive to obtain and protect certain intellectual property rights to our turnkey solutions
designs. We believe that having a significant level of protected proprietary technology gives us a
competitive advantage in marketing our services. However, we cannot be certain that the measures
that we employ will result in protected intellectual property rights or will result in the
prevention of unauthorized use of our technology. If we are unable to obtain and protect
intellectual property rights embodied within our designs, this could reduce or eliminate the
competitive advantages of our proprietary technology, which would harm our business.
Intellectual property infringement claims against our customers, our suppliers or us could harm our
business.
Our turnkey solutions products and services and those of our customers may compete against the
products of other companies, many of whom may own the intellectual property rights underlying those
products. Such products and services may also infringe the intellectual property rights of third
parties that may hold key intellectual property rights in areas in which we operate but which such
third parties do not actively provide products or services. Patent clearance or licensing
activities, if any, may be inadequate to anticipate and avoid third party claims. As a result, in
addition to the risk that we could become subject to claims of intellectual property infringement,
our customers or suppliers could become subject to infringement claims. Additionally, customers for
our
57
turnkey solutions, or collaborative designs in which we have significant technology
contributions, typically require that we indemnify them against the risk of intellectual property
infringement. If any claims are brought against us or against our customers for such infringement,
regardless of their merits, we could be required to expend significant resources in the defense or
settlement of such claims, or in the defense or settlement of related indemnification claims from
our customers. In the event of a claim, we may be required to spend a significant amount of money
to develop non-infringing alternatives or obtain licenses. We may not be successful in developing
such alternatives or obtaining such a license on reasonable terms or at all. Our customers may be
required to or decide to discontinue products which are alleged to be infringing rather than face
continued costs of defending the infringement claims, and such discontinuance may result in a
significant decrease in our business.
We depend on our officers, managers and skilled personnel.
Our success depends to a large extent upon the continued services of our executive officers
and other skilled personnel. Generally our employees are not bound by employment or non-competition
agreements, and we cannot assure you that we will retain our executive officers and other key
employees. We could be seriously harmed by the loss of any of our executive officers. In order to
manage our growth, we will need to internally develop and recruit and retain additional skilled
management personnel and if we are not able to do so, our business and our ability to continue to
grow could be harmed.
Any delay in the implementation of our information systems could disrupt our operations and cause
unanticipated increases in our costs.
We have completed the installation of an Enterprise Resource Planning system in most of our
manufacturing sites, excluding certain of the sites we acquired in the Taiwan Green Point
Enterprises Co., Ltd. (Green Point) acquisition transaction, and in our corporate location. We
are in the process of installing this system in certain of our remaining facilities, including
additional Green Point sites, which will replace the current Manufacturing Resource Planning
system, and financial information systems. Any delay in the implementation of these information
systems could result in material adverse consequences, including disruption of operations, loss of
information and unanticipated increases in costs.
Compliance or the failure to comply with current and future environmental, product stewardship and
producer responsibility laws or regulations could cause us significant expense.
We are subject to a variety of federal, state, local and foreign environmental, product
stewardship and producer responsibility laws and regulations, including those relating to the use,
storage, discharge and disposal of hazardous chemicals used during our manufacturing process, those
requiring design changes or conformity assessments or those relating to the recycling of products
we manufacture. If we fail to comply with any present and future regulations, we could become
subject to future liabilities, and we could face the suspension of production, or prohibitions on
sales of products we manufacture. In addition, such regulations could restrict our ability to
expand our facilities or could require us to acquire costly equipment, or to incur other
significant expenses, including expenses associated with the recall of any non-compliant product or
with changes in our procurement and inventory management activities.
Certain environmental laws impose liability for the costs of investigation, removal or
remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on an owner, occupier or operator of real estate, even
if such person or company was unaware of or not responsible for the presence of such substances.
Soil and groundwater contamination may have occurred at some of our facilities. From time to time
we investigate, remediate and monitor soil and groundwater contamination at certain of our
operating sites. In certain instances where contamination existed prior to our ownership or
occupation of a site, landlords or former owners have retained some contractual responsibility for
contamination and remediation. However, failure of such persons to perform those obligations could
result in us being required to remediate such contamination. As a result, we may incur clean-up
costs in such potential removal or remediation efforts. In other instances, we may be solely
responsible for clean-up costs associated with remediation efforts.
From time to time new regulations are enacted, or existing requirements are changed, and
it is difficult to anticipate how such regulations and changes will be implemented and enforced. We
continue to evaluate the necessary steps for compliance with regulations as they are enacted.
Over the last several years, we have become subject to certain legal requirements, principally
in Europe, regarding the use of certain hazardous substances in, and the collection, reuse and
recycling of waste from, certain products that use or generate electricity. Similar requirements
are being developed or imposed in other areas of the world where we manufacture or sell products,
including China and the U.S. We believe that we comply, and will be able to continue to comply,
with such emerging requirements. We may experience negative consequences from these emerging
requirements however, including, but not limited to, supply shortages or delays, increased raw
material and component costs, accelerated obsolescence of certain of our raw materials, components
and products and the need to modify or create new designs for our existing and future products.
58
Our failure to comply with any applicable regulatory requirements or with related contractual
obligations could result in our being directly or indirectly liable for costs (including product
recall and/or replacement costs), fines or penalties and third party claims, and could jeopardize
our ability to conduct business in the jurisdictions implementing them.
In addition, as global warming issues become more prevalent, the U.S. and foreign governments
are beginning to respond to these issues. This increasing governmental focus on global warming may
result in new environmental regulations that may negatively affect us, our suppliers and our
customers. This could cause us to incur additional direct costs in complying with any new
environmental regulations, as well as increased indirect costs resulting from our customers,
suppliers or both incurring additional compliance costs that get passed on to us. These costs may
adversely impact our operations and financial condition.
We and our customers are increasingly concerned with environmental issues, such as waste
management (including recycling) and climate change (including reducing carbon outputs). We expect
these concerns to grow and require increased investments of time and resources.
We are subject to the risk of increased taxes.
We base our tax position upon the anticipated nature and conduct of our business and upon our
understanding of the tax laws of the various countries in which we have assets or conduct
activities. Our tax position, however, is subject to review and possible challenge by taxing
authorities and to possible changes in law (including adverse changes to the manner in which the
U.S. taxes U.S. based multinational companies). We cannot determine in advance the extent to which
some jurisdictions may assess additional tax or interest and penalties on such additional taxes.
For example, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) completed its field examination of our tax
returns for the fiscal years 2003 through 2005 and issued a Revenue Agents Report (RAR) on April
30, 2010 proposing adjustments primarily related to the IRS contentions that (1) certain corporate
expenses relate to services provided to foreign affiliates and therefore must be charged to those
affiliates, and (2) valuable intangible property was transferred to certain foreign affiliates
without charge. If the IRS ultimately prevails in its positions, our income tax payment due for the
fiscal years 2003 through 2005 would be approximately an additional $69.3 million before
utilization of any tax attributes arising in periods subsequent to fiscal year 2005. In addition,
the IRS will likely make similar claims in future audits with respect to these types of
transactions (at this time, determination of the additional income tax due for these later years is
not practicable). Also, the IRS has proposed interest and penalties on us with respect to fiscal
years 2003 through 2005, and we anticipate the IRS may seek to impose interest and penalties in
subsequent years with respect to the same types of issues. We disagree with the proposed
adjustments and are vigorously contesting this matter through applicable IRS and judicial
procedures, as appropriate. While we currently believe that the resolution of these issues will not
have a material effect on our financial position or liquidity, an unfavorable resolution,
particularly if the IRS successfully asserts similar claims for later years, could have a material
effect on our results of operations and financial condition (particularly during the quarter in
which any adjustment is recorded or any tax is due or paid). For further discussion related to our
income taxes, refer to Note 12 Income Taxes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Income Taxes and Note 4 Income Taxes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
August 31, 2010.
In addition, our effective tax rate may be increased by the generation of higher income in
countries with higher tax rates, or changes in local tax rates. For example, China enacted a
unified enterprise income tax law, effective January 1, 2008, which has resulted in a higher tax
rate on operations in China as the rate increase is phased in over several years.
Several countries in which we are located allow for tax incentives to attract and retain
business. We have obtained incentives where available and practicable. Our taxes could increase if
certain tax incentives are retracted (which in some cases could occur if we fail to satisfy the
conditions on which such incentives are based), or if they are not renewed upon expiration, or tax
rates applicable to us in such jurisdictions otherwise increase. It is anticipated that tax
incentives with respect to certain operations will expire within the next year. However, due to the
possibility of changes in existing tax law and our operations, we are unable to predict how these
expirations will impact us in the future. In addition, acquisitions may cause our effective tax
rate to increase, depending on the jurisdictions in which the acquired operations are located.
Our credit rating may be downgraded.
Our credit is rated by credit rating agencies. Our 7.750% Senior Notes, our 8.250% Senior
Notes and our 5.625% Senior Notes are currently rated BBB- by Fitch Ratings (Fitch), Ba1 by
Moodys and BB+ by S&P, and are considered to be below investment grade debt by Moodys and S&P
and investment grade debt by Fitch. Any potential future negative change in our credit rating may
make it more expensive for us to raise additional capital in the future on terms that are
acceptable to us, if at all; negatively impact the price of our common stock; increase our interest payments under existing debt agreements;
and have other negative implications on our business, many of which are beyond our control. In
addition, as discussed in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources, the interest rate payable on the 8.250% Senior
Notes and
59
under the Amended and Restated Credit Facility is subject to adjustment from time to time
if our credit ratings change. Thus, any potential future negative change in our credit rating may
increase the interest rate payable on the 8.250% Senior Notes, the Amended and Restated Credit
Facility and certain of our other borrowings.
Our amount of debt could significantly increase in the future.
As of May 31, 2011, our debt obligations consisted of $400.0 million under our 8.250% Senior
Notes, $312.0 million under our 7.750% Senior Notes and $400.0 million under our 5.625% Senior
Notes. As of May 31, 2011, there was $80.5 million outstanding under various bank loans to certain
of our foreign subsidiaries and under various other debt obligations. Refer to Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital
Resources and Note 10 Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for further details.
We have the ability to borrow up to $1.0 billion under the Amended and Restated Credit
Facility. In addition, the Amended and Restated Credit Facility contemplates a potential increase
of up to an additional $300.0 million, if we and the lenders later agree to such increase. We could
incur additional indebtedness in the future in the form of bank loans, notes or convertible
securities.
Should we desire to consummate significant additional acquisition opportunities, undertake
significant additional expansion activities or make substantial investments in our infrastructure,
our capital needs would increase and could possibly result in our need to increase available
borrowings under our revolving credit facilities or access public or private debt and equity
markets. There can be no assurance, however, that we would be successful in raising additional debt
or equity on terms that we would consider acceptable. An increase in the level of our indebtedness,
among other things, could:
|
|
|
make it difficult for us to obtain any necessary financing in the future for
other acquisitions, working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements or
other purposes; |
|
|
|
|
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to changes in, our business; |
|
|
|
|
make us more vulnerable in the event of a downturn in our business; and |
|
|
|
|
impact certain financial covenants that we are subject to in connection with
our debt and securitization programs, including, among others, the maximum ratio of
debt to consolidated EBITDA (as defined in our debt agreements and securitization
programs). |
There can be no assurance that we will be able to meet future debt service obligations.
We are subject to risks of currency fluctuations and related hedging operations.
More than an insignificant portion of our business is conducted in currencies other than the
U.S. dollar. Changes in exchange rates among other currencies and the U.S. dollar will affect our
cost of sales, operating margins and net revenue. We cannot predict the impact of future exchange
rate fluctuations. We use financial instruments, primarily forward contracts, to economically hedge
U.S. dollar and other currency commitments arising from trade accounts receivable, trade accounts
payable, fixed purchase obligations and other foreign currency obligations. Based on our
calculations and current forecasts, we believe that our hedging activities enable us to largely
protect ourselves from future exchange rate fluctuations. If, however, these hedging activities are
not successful or if we change or reduce these hedging activities in the future, we may experience
significant unexpected expenses from fluctuations in exchange rates.
An adverse change in the interest rates for our borrowings could adversely affect our financial
condition.
We pay interest on outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit facilities and certain
other long term debt obligations at interest rates that fluctuate based upon changes in various
base interest rates. An adverse change in the base rates upon which our interest rates are
determined could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations
and cash flows.
We face certain risks in collecting our trade accounts receivable.
Most of our customer sales are paid for after the goods and services have been delivered. If
any of our customers has any liquidity issues (the risk of which could be relatively high, relative
to historical conditions, due to current economic conditions), then we could encounter delays or
defaults in payments owed to us which could have a significant adverse impact on our financial
condition and results of operations. For example, two of our customers each filed a petition in
fiscal year 2009 for reorganization under bankruptcy law. We have analyzed our financial exposure
resulting from both of these customers bankruptcy filings and as a result have recorded an
allowance for doubtful accounts based upon our anticipated exposure associated with these events.
Our allowance for doubtful trade accounts receivable was $6.8 million as of May 31, 2011 (which
represented approximately 1% of our gross trade accounts receivable balance) and $13.9 million as
of August 31, 2010 (which represented approximately 1% of our gross trade accounts receivable
balance).
60
Certain of our existing stockholders have significant control.
At May 31, 2011, our executive officers, directors and certain of their family members
collectively beneficially owned 11.1% of our outstanding common stock, of which William D. Morean,
our Chairman of the Board, beneficially owned 6.6% . As a result, our executive officers, directors
and certain of their family members have significant influence over (1) the election of our Board
of Directors, (2) the approval or disapproval of any other matters requiring stockholder approval
and (3) the affairs and policies of Jabil.
Our stock price may be volatile.
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (the NYSE). The market price of
our common stock has fluctuated substantially in the past and could fluctuate substantially in the
future, based on a variety of factors, including future announcements covering us or our key
customers or competitors, government regulations, litigation, changes in earnings estimates by
analysts, fluctuations in quarterly operating results, or general conditions in our industry and
the aerospace, automotive, computing, consumer, defense, industrial, instrumentation, medical,
networking, peripherals, solar, storage and telecommunications industries. Furthermore, stock
prices for many companies and high technology companies in particular, fluctuate widely for reasons
that may be unrelated to their operating results. Those fluctuations and general economic,
political and market conditions, such as recessions or international currency fluctuations and
demand for our services, may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Provisions in our charter documents and state law may make it harder for others to obtain control
of us even though some shareholders might consider such a development to be favorable.
Our shareholder rights plan, provisions of our amended certificate of incorporation and the
Delaware Corporation Laws may delay, inhibit or prevent someone from gaining control of us through
a tender offer, business combination, proxy contest or some other method. These provisions may
adversely impact our shareholders because they may decrease the possibility of a transaction in
which our shareholders receive an amount of consideration in exchange for their shares that is at a
significant premium to the then current market price of our shares. These provisions include:
|
|
|
a poison pill shareholder rights plan; |
|
|
|
|
a restriction in our bylaws on the ability of shareholders to take action by
less than unanimous written consent; and |
|
|
|
|
a statutory restriction on business combinations with some types of interested
shareholders. |
Changes in the securities laws and regulations have increased, and may continue to increase, our
costs; and any future changes would likely increase our costs.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as related rules promulgated by the SEC and the NYSE,
required changes in some of our corporate governance, securities disclosure and compliance
practices. Compliance with these rules has increased our legal and financial accounting costs for
several years following the announcement and effectiveness of these new rules. While these costs
are no longer increasing, they may in fact increase in the future. In addition, given the recent
turmoil in the securities and credit markets, as well as the global economy, many U.S. and
international governmental, regulatory and supervisory authorities including, but not limited to,
the SEC and the NYSE, have recently enacted additional changes in their laws, regulations and rules
(such as the recent Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act) and may be
contemplating additional changes. These changes, and any such future changes, may cause our legal
and financial accounting costs to increase.
Due to inherent limitations, there can be no assurance that our system of disclosure and internal
controls and procedures will be successful in preventing all errors or fraud, or in informing
management of all material information in a timely manner.
Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our disclosure controls and
internal controls and procedures will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter
how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the
objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system reflects that
there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their
costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can
provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the
company have been or will be detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that
judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur simply because of error or
mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by
collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control.
The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the
likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in
achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, a control may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system,
misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be detected.
61
If we receive other than an unqualified opinion on the adequacy of our internal control over
financial reporting as of August 31, 2011 or any future year-ends, investors could lose confidence
in the reliability of our financial statements, which could result in a decrease in the value of
your shares.
Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, public companies are required to
include an annual report on internal control over financial reporting in their annual reports on
Form 10-K that contains an assessment by management of the effectiveness of the companys internal
control over financial reporting. Our former independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG
LLP, issued an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of August 31, 2010. While we continuously conduct a rigorous review of our internal
control over financial reporting in order to assure compliance with the Section 404 requirements,
if our independent registered public accounting firm interprets the Section 404 requirements and
the related rules and regulations differently from us or if our independent registered public
accounting firm is not satisfied with our internal control over financial reporting or with the
level at which it is documented, operated or reviewed, they may issue an adverse opinion. An
adverse opinion could result in an adverse reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of
confidence in the reliability of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In addition, we have spent a significant amount of resources in complying with Section 404s
requirements. For the foreseeable future, we will likely continue to spend substantial amounts
complying with Section 404s requirements, as well as improving and enhancing our internal control
over financial reporting.
There are inherent uncertainties involved in estimates, judgments and assumptions used in the
preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (U.S. GAAP). Any changes in U.S. GAAP or in estimates, judgments and assumptions could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations.
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in the periodic reports we file with
the SEC are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in
accordance with U.S. GAAP involves making estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect reported
amounts of assets, liabilities and related reserves, revenues, expenses and income. Estimates,
judgments and assumptions are inherently subject to change in the future, and any such changes
could result in corresponding changes to the amounts of assets, liabilities and related reserves,
revenues, expenses and income. Any such changes could have a material adverse effect on our
financial position and results of operations. In addition, the principles of U.S. GAAP are subject
to interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants, the SEC and various bodies formed to create appropriate accounting policies,
and interpret such policies. A change in those policies can have a significant effect on our
accounting methods. For example, although not yet currently required, the SEC could require us to
adopt the International Financial Reporting Standards in the next few years, which could have a
significant effect on certain of our accounting methods.
We are subject to risks associated with natural disasters and global events.
Our operations may be subject to natural disasters (such as the recent earthquake and tsunami
in Japan) or other business disruptions, which could seriously harm our results of operation and
increase our costs and expenses. We are susceptible to losses and interruptions caused by
hurricanes (including in Florida, where our headquarters are located), earthquakes, power
shortages, telecommunications failures, water shortages, tsunamis, floods, typhoons, fire, extreme
weather conditions, geopolitical events such as terrorist acts or widespread criminal activities
and other natural or manmade disasters. Our insurance coverage with respect to natural disasters is
limited and is subject to deductibles and coverage limits. Such coverage may not be adequate, or
may not continue to be available at commercially reasonable rates and terms.
Energy price increases may negatively impact our results of operations.
Certain of the components that we use in our manufacturing activities are petroleum-based. In
addition, we, along with our suppliers and customers, rely on various energy sources (including
oil) in our transportation activities. While significant uncertainty currently exists about the
future levels of energy prices, which have recently increased, a further significant increase is
possible. Increased energy prices could cause an increase to our raw material costs and
transportation costs. In addition, increased transportation costs of certain of our suppliers and
customers could be passed along to us. We may not be able to increase our product prices enough to
offset these increased costs. In addition, any increase in our product prices may reduce our future
customer orders and profitability.
Item 2: UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The following table provides information relating to the Companys repurchase of common stock
for the third quarter of fiscal year 2011.
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Dollar Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Shares that May |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as |
|
|
Yet Be |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Announced |
|
|
Under the |
|
Period |
|
Purchased (1) |
|
|
Paid per Share |
|
|
Program |
|
|
Program |
|
March 1, 2011 March 31, 2011 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
21.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2011 April 30, 2011 |
|
|
871 |
|
|
$ |
19.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2011 May 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
873 |
|
|
$ |
19.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The number of shares reported above as purchased are attributable to shares surrendered to
us by employees in payment of the exercise price related to Option exercises or minimum tax
obligations related to vesting of restricted shares. |
Item 3: DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
Item 4: (REMOVED AND RESERVED)
Item 5: OTHER INFORMATION
None.
63
|
|
|
|
|
3.1(1)
|
|
|
|
The Registrants Certificate of Incorporation, as amended. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2(2)
|
|
|
|
The Registrants Bylaws, as amended. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1(3)
|
|
|
|
Form of Certificate for Shares of the Registrants Common Stock. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.2(4)
|
|
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of October 19, 2001, between the Registrant and EquiServe Trust Company,
N.A., which includes the form of the Certificate of Designation as Exhibit A, form of the Rights
Certificate as Exhibit B, and the Summary of Rights as Exhibit C. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.3(5)
|
|
|
|
Indenture, dated January 16, 2008 by the Registrant and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A. (formerly known as The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.), as trustee. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.4(6)
|
|
|
|
Form of 8.250% Registered Senior Notes issued on July 18, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.5(7)
|
|
|
|
Form of 7.750% Registered Senior Notes issued on August 11, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.6(7)
|
|
|
|
Officers Certificate of the Registrant pursuant to the Indenture, dated August 11, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
4. 7(8)
|
|
|
|
Form of 5.625% Registered Senior Notes issued on November 2, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.8(8)
|
|
|
|
Officers Certificate of the Registrant pursuant to the Indenture, dated November 2, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (PBRSU EPS NON). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (PBRSU EPS OEU). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (PBRSU EPS ONEU). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
Form of Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (TBRSU DIR). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
Form of Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (TBRSU NON). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
Form of Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (TBRSU OEU). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
Form of Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (TBRSU ONEU). |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
|
Section 1350 Certification by the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
|
|
Section 1350 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS(9)
|
|
|
|
XBRL Instance Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH(9)
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL(9)
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB(9)
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE(9)
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF(9)
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended February 29, 2000. |
64
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the
Registrant on October 29, 2008. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1 filed by the Registrant on March 17, 1993 (File No. 33-58974). |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Form 8-A (File No. 001-14063) filed October 19,
2001. |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the
Registrant on January 17, 2008. |
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended August 31, 2008. |
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the
Registrant on August 12, 2009. |
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the
Registrant on November 2, 2010. |
|
(9) |
|
These interactive data files shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, or otherwise subject to liability under those sections. |
65
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jabil Circuit, Inc.
Registrant
|
|
Date: June 30, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ TIMOTHY L. MAIN
|
|
|
|
Timothy L. Main |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
Date: June 30, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ FORBES I.J. ALEXANDER
|
|
|
|
Forbes I.J. Alexander |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
66
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
|
|
Description |
31.1
|
|
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by the President and Chief Executive Officer of Jabil Circuit, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by the Chief Financial Officer of Jabil Circuit, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
|
Section 1350 Certification by the President and Chief Executive Officer of Jabil Circuit, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
|
|
Section 1350 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer of Jabil Circuit, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (PBRSU EPS NON). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (PBRSU EPS OEU). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (PBRSU EPS ONEU). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
Form of Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (TBRSU DIR). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
Form of Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (TBRSU NON). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
Form of Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (TBRSU OEU). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
Form of Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (TBRSU ONEU). |
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
|
|
XBRL Instance Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document. |
67