UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended | September 30, 2012 |
Commission File Number 001-34974
__________________________
AEROFLEX HOLDING CORP.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
DELAWARE | 01-0899019 | |
(State or other jurisdiction | (I.R.S. Employer | |
of incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
35 South Service Road | ||
P.O. Box 6022 | ||
Plainview, N.Y. | 11803-0622 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(516) 694-6700 | ||
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) | ||
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer ¨ | Accelerated filer x |
Non-accelerated filer ¨ | Smaller reporting company ¨ |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ¨ No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date.
November 7, 2012 | 84,851,868 | |
(Date) | (Number of Shares) |
AEROFLEX HOLDING CORP.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
PAGE | ||
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||
Item 1 | UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS | |
September 30, 2012 and June 30, 2012 | 2 | |
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS | ||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 | 3 | |
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) | ||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 | 4 | |
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS | ||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 | 5 | |
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 6 – 13 | |
Item 2 | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 | 14 – 22 | |
Item 3 | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK | 23 |
Item 4 | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES | 23 |
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION | ||
Item 1 | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS | 24 |
Item 1A | RISK FACTORS | 24 |
Item 2 | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS | 24 |
Item 3 | DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES | 24 |
Item 4 | MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES | 24 |
Item 5 | OTHER INFORMATION | 24 |
Item 6 | EXHIBITS | 25 |
SIGNATURE | 26 | |
EXHIBIT INDEX | 27 | |
CERTIFICATIONS |
1 |
Aeroflex Holding Corp. and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
September 30, | June 30, | |||||||
2012 | 2012 | |||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 45,235 | $ | 41,324 | ||||
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,527 and $981 | 113,547 | 146,597 | ||||||
Inventories | 158,318 | 158,090 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 29,825 | 33,315 | ||||||
Income taxes receivable | 5,076 | 4,935 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 12,984 | 11,942 | ||||||
Total current assets | 364,985 | 396,203 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $107,813 and $102,310 | 102,341 | 101,632 | ||||||
Deferred financing costs, net | 14,569 | 15,720 | ||||||
Other assets | 32,334 | 34,955 | ||||||
Intangible assets with definite lives, net | 108,057 | 119,476 | ||||||
Intangible assets with indefinite lives | 114,206 | 113,461 | ||||||
Goodwill | 410,124 | 408,361 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,146,616 | $ | 1,189,808 | ||||
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | ||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 25,144 | $ | 26,822 | ||||
Advance payments by customers and deferred revenue | 21,660 | 23,433 | ||||||
Income taxes payable | 417 | 593 | ||||||
Accrued payroll expenses | 18,970 | 18,635 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | 36,654 | 37,559 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 102,845 | 107,042 | ||||||
Long-term debt | 616,375 | 641,375 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 88,186 | 94,022 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 20,386 | 20,592 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 827,792 | 863,031 | ||||||
Stockholders' equity: | ||||||||
Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share; 50,000,000 shares authorized, | ||||||||
no shares issued and outstanding | - | - | ||||||
Common stock, par value $.01 per share; 300,000,000 shares authorized; | ||||||||
84,851,868 and 84,845,687 shares issued and outstanding | 848 | 848 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 648,801 | 648,092 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (33,999 | ) | (39,476 | ) | ||||
Accumulated deficit | (296,826 | ) | (282,687 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders' equity | 318,824 | 326,777 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 1,146,616 | $ | 1,189,808 |
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
2 |
Aeroflex Holding Corp. and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Net sales | $ | 141,153 | $ | 154,884 | ||||
Cost of sales | 72,254 | 76,365 | ||||||
Gross profit | 68,899 | 78,519 | ||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||
Selling, general and administrative costs | 35,703 | 37,131 | ||||||
Research and development costs | 20,878 | 24,275 | ||||||
Amortization of acquired intangibles | 14,580 | 15,736 | ||||||
Restructuring charges | 3,267 | 436 | ||||||
Change in fair value of acquisition contingent consideration liability | - | 403 | ||||||
Total operating expenses | 74,428 | 77,981 | ||||||
Operating income (loss) | (5,529 | ) | 538 | |||||
Other income (expense): | ||||||||
Interest expense | (10,078 | ) | (8,574 | ) | ||||
Write-off of deferred financing costs | (597 | ) | - | |||||
Other income (expense), net | (289 | ) | (295 | ) | ||||
Total other income (expense), net | (10,964 | ) | (8,869 | ) | ||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | (16,493 | ) | (8,331 | ) | ||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | (2,354 | ) | (3,289 | ) | ||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (14,139 | ) | $ | (5,042 | ) | ||
Net income (loss) per common share: | ||||||||
Basic and diluted | $ | (0.17 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | ||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: | ||||||||
Basic and diluted | 84,836 | 84,789 |
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3 |
Aeroflex Holding Corp. and Subsidiaries |
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
(In thousands) |
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (14,139 | ) | $ | (5,042 | ) | ||
Other comprehensive income (loss): | ||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax provision (benefit) of $192 and $(316) | 5,477 | (7,378 | ) | |||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) | $ | (8,662 | ) | $ | (12,420 | ) |
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4 |
Aeroflex Holding Corp. and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (14,139 | ) | $ | (5,042 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 20,123 | 20,974 | ||||||
Change in fair value of acquisition contingent consideration liability | - | 403 | ||||||
Write-off of deferred financing costs | 597 | - | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | (2,629 | ) | 394 | |||||
Share-based compensation | 636 | 600 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs | 554 | 502 | ||||||
Other, net | 511 | 426 | ||||||
Change in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable | 33,023 | 23,582 | ||||||
Decrease (increase) in inventories | 94 | (10,774 | ) | |||||
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets | (1,438 | ) | (2,249 | ) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities | (5,338 | ) | (29,985 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | 31,994 | (1,169 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||
Capital expenditures | (4,087 | ) | (4,713 | ) | ||||
Other, net | 248 | 4 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | (3,839 | ) | (4,709 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||
Debt repayments | (25,000 | ) | (1,812 | ) | ||||
Deferred financing costs | - | (82 | ) | |||||
Other, net | (21 | ) | - | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | (25,021 | ) | (1,894 | ) | ||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | 777 | (1,020 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 3,911 | (8,792 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 41,324 | 66,278 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 45,235 | $ | 57,486 |
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5 |
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial information of Aeroflex Holding Corp. and subsidiaries (“we”, “our”, “us”, or the “Company”) has been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and reflects all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, which in management’s opinion are necessary to state fairly the Company’s financial position as of September 30, 2012, its results of operations for the three month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 and its cash flows for the three month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. The June 30, 2012 balance sheet information has been derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all information or disclosures required by U.S. GAAP.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of sales and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimates, and such differences may be material to the financial statements.
These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 (“the fiscal 2012 Form 10-K”).
Unless the context requires otherwise, (i) “Sponsors” refers collectively to affiliates of or funds managed by The Veritas Capital Fund III, L.P., Golden Gate Private Equity, Inc., and GS Direct, L.L.C., which indirectly control the Company and (ii) “fiscal” refers to the twelve months ended June 30 of the applicable year. For example, “fiscal 2012” refers to the twelve months ended June 30, 2012.
Results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full fiscal year or any future periods.
2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued authoritative guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income. The new guidance eliminates the option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of stockholders’ equity. Instead, an entity is required to present either a continuous statement of net income and other comprehensive income or two separate but consecutive statements. The new guidance also requires entities to present reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component in both the statement in which net income is presented and the statement in which other comprehensive income is presented. This new guidance became effective for us beginning with the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and was applied retrospectively. We have presented other comprehensive income in a separate statement immediately following our Statement of Operations. In December 2011, the FASB issued guidance which indefinitely defers the guidance related to the presentation of reclassification adjustments.
In September 2011, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on testing goodwill for impairment. The new guidance provides an entity the option to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If an entity determines that this is the case, it is required to perform the currently prescribed two-step goodwill impairment test to identify potential goodwill impairment and measure the amount of goodwill impairment loss to be recognized for that reporting unit (if any). If an entity determines that the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, the two-step goodwill impairment test is not required. This new guidance became effective for us beginning with the first quarter of fiscal 2013. The adoption of this new guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.
6 |
In July 2012, the FASB issued authoritative guidance allowing entities to use a qualitative approach to test indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment. The new guidance permits an entity to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying value. If it is concluded that this is the case, it is necessary to perform the currently prescribed quantitative impairment test by comparing the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset with its carrying value. Otherwise, the quantitative impairment test is not required. We adopted this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2013. The adoption of the new guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.
3. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
We assess goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives at least annually for impairment in the fourth quarter of our fiscal year, or more frequently if certain events or circumstances indicate an impairment may have occurred. We test goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level, which is one level below our operating segments.
The carrying amount of goodwill, by segment, was as follows:
Microelectronic | Test | |||||||||||
Solutions | Solutions | Total | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2012 | $ | 248,090 | $ | 160,271 | $ | 408,361 | ||||||
Translation adjustments | 856 | 907 | 1,763 | |||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2012 | $ | 248,946 | $ | 161,178 | $ | 410,124 |
The components of amortizable intangible assets were as follows:
September 30, 2012 | June 30, 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying | Accumulated | Total Net | Carrying | Accumulated | Total Net | |||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Amortization | Book Value | Amount | Amortization | Book Value | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed technology | $ | 203,350 | $ | 172,802 | $ | 30,548 | $ | 199,489 | $ | 164,065 | $ | 35,424 | ||||||||||||
Customer related intangibles | 227,419 | 152,961 | 74,458 | 226,865 | 146,259 | 80,606 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-compete arrangements | 10,379 | 8,429 | 1,950 | 10,292 | 8,007 | 2,285 | ||||||||||||||||||
Trade names | 3,354 | 2,253 | 1,101 | 3,298 | 2,137 | 1,161 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 444,502 | $ | 336,445 | $ | 108,057 | $ | 439,944 | $ | 320,468 | $ | 119,476 | ||||||||||||
7 |
4. Restructuring Charges
The following table sets forth the charges and payments related to the restructuring liability, which is reflected in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets for the periods indicated:
Balance | Balance | |||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||
2012 | Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||
Effect of | ||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring | Cash | Foreign | Restructuring | |||||||||||||||||
Liability | Net Additions | Payments | Currency | Liability | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Severance costs | $ | 2,085 | $ | 2,500 | $ | (2,759 | ) | $ | 47 | $ | 1,873 | |||||||||
Facilities closure costs | 502 | 767 | (449 | ) | - | 820 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 2,587 | $ | 3,267 | $ | (3,208 | ) | $ | 47 | $ | 2,693 |
In the three months ended September 30, 2012, we implemented headcount reductions of 53 employees and closed our ATS Hong Kong office in order to continue to right size the business.
5. Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following:
September 30, | June 30, | |||||||
2012 | 2012 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Raw materials | $ | 82,431 | $ | 82,202 | ||||
Work in process | 47,945 | 45,067 | ||||||
Finished goods | 27,942 | 30,821 | ||||||
$ | 158,318 | $ | 158,090 |
6. Derivative Financial Instruments
We address certain financial exposures through a controlled program of risk management that includes the use of derivative financial instruments. When deemed appropriate to do so, we enter into interest rate swap derivatives to manage the effects of interest rate movements on portions of our debt. We routinely enter into foreign currency forward contracts, not designated as hedging instruments, to protect us from fluctuations in exchange rates.
Foreign Currency Contract Derivatives
Foreign currency contracts are used to protect us from fluctuations in exchange rates. Our foreign currency contracts are not designated as hedges and therefore the change in fair value is included in other income (expense) as it occurs. As of September 30, 2012, we had $31.4 million of notional value foreign currency forward contracts maturing through October 31, 2012. Notional amounts do not quantify risk or represent assets or liabilities of the Company, but are used in the calculation of cash settlements under the contracts.
8 |
The fair values of our derivative financial instruments included in the consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2012 and June 30, 2012 were as follows:
Asset (Liability) Derivatives | ||||||||||||
September 30, 2012 | June 30, 2012 | |||||||||||
Balance Sheet | Balance Sheet | |||||||||||
Location | Fair Value (1) | Location | Fair Value (1) | |||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency forward contracts | Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | $ | (2 | ) | Prepaid expenses and other current assets | $ | 23 |
(1) | The fair values of derivative assets and liabilities are determined based on observable market data and are considered level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. |
The amounts of the gains and losses related to our derivative financial instruments not designated as hedging instruments for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:
Derivatives Not | Location of Gain or (Loss) | Amount of Gain or (Loss) | |||||||
Designated as | Recognized in Earnings on | Recognized in Earnings on | |||||||
Hedging Instruments | Derivative | Derivative | |||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||
Foreign currency forward contracts | Other income (expense) | $ | (25 | ) | $ | 156 |
7. Long Term Debt and Credit Agreements
On May 24, 2012, we amended our senior secured credit facility, which allowed us to increase the flexibility under the total leverage ratio covenant. As of result of the amendment, the applicable LIBOR interest margin increased from 300 basis points to 450 basis points.
For the three months ended September 30, 2012, we voluntarily prepaid $25.0 million of our term loan with cash on hand from operations. The voluntary prepayment resulted in the write-off of the related deferred financing costs of $597,000.
As of September 30, 2012, we were in compliance with all of the financial covenants contained in the senior secured credit facility.
Interest paid was $9.2 million and $8.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Accrued interest of $5.2 million and $5.1 million was included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities at September 30, 2012 and June 30, 2012, respectively.
9 |
The fair value of our debt instruments was as follows:
As of September 30, 2012 | |||||||
Carrying Amount | Estimated Fair Value | ||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||
Senior secured term loan facility | $ | 616,375 | $ | 618,671 |
As of June 30, 2012, our total debt had a carrying value of $641.4 million and a fair value of $622.1 million.
The estimated fair values of each of our debt instruments were based on quoted prices and are considered Level 2 measurements. Fair value estimates related to our debt instruments are made at a specific point in time based on relevant market information. The estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgments and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect these estimates.
8. Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share
Our consolidated statements of operations present basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share. Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share reflects the dilutive effects of RSUs. The treasury stock method was used to determine the dilutive effect of potentially dilutive securities. Due to the net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2012, all 340,000 shares of common stock equivalents were excluded from diluted net income (loss) per common share because they were anti-dilutive. There were no potentially dilutive securities for the three months ended September 30, 2011.
9. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) was as follows:
As of and for the | ||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Net minimum pension liability, beginning of year | $ | (1,448 | ) | $ | (544 | ) | ||
Three months' activity in minimum pension liability, net of tax | - | - | ||||||
Net minimum pension liability, September 30 | (1,448 | ) | (544 | ) | ||||
Net cumulative translation adjustment, beginning of year | (38,028 | ) | (31,992 | ) | ||||
Three months' activity in cumulative translation adjustment, net of tax | 5,477 | (7,378 | ) | |||||
Net cumulative translation adjustment, September 30 | (32,551 | ) | (39,370 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | $ | (33,999 | ) | $ | (39,914 | ) |
10. Income Taxes
The income tax benefit was $2.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 on a pre-tax loss of $16.5 million. We recorded an income tax benefit for the three months ended September 30, 2011 of $3.3 million on a pre-tax loss of $8.3 million. The effective income tax rate for both periods differed from the amount computed by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate to income before taxes primarily due to foreign, state and local income taxes, including U.S. income tax on certain foreign net income that we anticipate will be repatriated to the U.S.
10 |
The income tax benefit for the three months ended September 30, 2012 reflects a discrete benefit of $116,000 relating to a statutory income tax rate reduction in the U.K. and a reduction of a deferred tax liability related to the repatriation of funds from our Chinese subsidiary largely offset by a true-up of a deferred tax item in the U.K. The income tax benefit for the three months ended September 30, 2011 reflects a discrete benefit of $700,000 relating to a reduction in the statutory income tax rate in the U.K.
Absent the discrete items, the effective tax rates were 14% and 31% for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The current year’s provision was a combination of projected annual U.S. tax benefit on a domestic book loss and foreign tax expense on foreign earnings. The prior year’s provision was a combination of projected annual U.S. tax expense on domestic earnings and foreign tax expense on foreign earnings. The resulting projected net consolidated income tax rate was applied against year-to-date pre-tax income to arrive at the year-to-date provision before adjustment for discrete items.
In the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we paid income taxes of $1.2 million and $3.5 million and received refunds of $843,000 and $94,000, respectively.
11. Legal Matters
We have identified instances of noncompliance with the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, or ITAR, in certain of our past business activities as well as in the pre-acquisition business activities of certain acquired companies. These include the inadvertent misclassification and/or export of products without the required license and the disclosure of controlled technology to certain foreign national employees. These matters were formally disclosed to the U.S. Department of State from time to time from fiscal 2007 through fiscal 2012. Matters resolved to date have been without penalty. At this time it is not possible to determine whether any fines or other penalties will be assessed against us or the materiality of the outcome of the remaining ITAR matters.
In March 2005, we sold the net assets of our shock and vibration control device manufacturing business, which we refer to as VMC. Under the terms of the sale agreements, we retained certain liabilities relating to adverse environmental conditions that existed at the premises occupied by VMC as of the date of sale. We recorded a liability for the estimated remediation costs related to adverse environmental conditions that existed at the VMC premises when it was sold. The accrued environmental liability at September 30, 2012 was $1.3 million, of which $350,000 is expected to be paid within one year.
We are also involved in various other claims and legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of any of these actions will have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial position, liquidity or capital resources.
12. Business Segments
We are a global provider of radio frequency, or RF, and microwave integrated circuits, components and systems used in the design, development and maintenance of technically demanding, high-performance wireless communication systems. Our solutions include highly specialized microelectronic components and test and measurement equipment used by companies in the space, avionics, defense, commercial wireless communications, medical and other markets. Approximately 32% and 34% of our sales for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, were to agencies of the United States government or to prime defense contractors or subcontractors of the United States government. No customer constituted more than 10% of sales during any of the periods presented. Inter-segment sales were not material and have been eliminated from the tables below.
11 |
The majority of our operations are located in the United States. We also have operations in Europe and Asia, with our most significant non-U.S. operations in the U.K. Net sales from facilities located in the U.K. were $35.3 million and $34.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Total assets of the U.K. operations were $177.4 million as of September 30, 2012 and $177.9 million as of June 30, 2012.
Net sales, based on the customers’ locations, attributed to the United States and other regions were as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
United States of America | $ | 79,792 | $ | 90,186 | ||||
Europe and Middle East | 35,808 | 33,304 | ||||||
Asia and Australia | 22,149 | 26,609 | ||||||
Other regions | 3,404 | 4,785 | ||||||
$ | 141,153 | $ | 154,884 |
We organize our operations into two segments: Aeroflex Microelectronic Solutions, or AMS, and Aeroflex Test Solutions, or ATS. We engineer, manufacture and market a diverse range of products in each of our segments.
AMS offers a broad range of microelectronics products and is a leading provider of high-performance, high reliability specialty microelectronics components. Its products include high reliability, or HiRel, microelectronics/semiconductors, RF and microwave components, mixed-signal/digital Application Specific Integrated Circuits (“ASICs”) and motion control products. ATS is a leading provider of a broad line of specialized test and measurement equipment. Its products include wireless test equipment, military radio and private mobile radio test equipment, avionics test equipment, synthetic test equipment and general purpose test equipment.
12 |
Selected financial data by segment was as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Net sales | ||||||||
- Microelectronic solutions ("AMS") | $ | 74,450 | $ | 81,805 | ||||
- Test solutions ("ATS") | 66,703 | 73,079 | ||||||
Net sales | $ | 141,153 | $ | 154,884 | ||||
Segment adjusted operating income | ||||||||
- AMS | $ | 15,413 | $ | 19,388 | ||||
- ATS | 2,206 | 1,829 | ||||||
- General corporate expense | (4,026 | ) | (3,420 | ) | ||||
Adjusted operating income | 13,593 | 17,797 | ||||||
Amortization of acquired intangibles | ||||||||
- AMS | (8,833 | ) | (9,033 | ) | ||||
- ATS | (5,747 | ) | (6,703 | ) | ||||
Share-based compensation | ||||||||
- Corporate | (458 | ) | (600 | ) | ||||
- AMS | (109 | ) | - | |||||
- ATS | (69 | ) | - | |||||
Restructuring charges | ||||||||
- AMS | (204 | ) | (376 | ) | ||||
- ATS | (3,063 | ) | (60 | ) | ||||
Business acquisition and divestiture related costs - Corporate | (597 | ) | (14 | ) | ||||
Increase in fair value of acquisition contingent | ||||||||
consideration liability - Corporate | - | (403 | ) | |||||
Current period impact of acquisition related adjustments | ||||||||
- AMS | (9 | ) | (38 | ) | ||||
- ATS | 22 | 23 | ||||||
- Corporate | (55 | ) | (55 | ) | ||||
Operating income (loss) (GAAP) | (5,529 | ) | 538 | |||||
Interest expense | (10,078 | ) | (8,574 | ) | ||||
Write-off of deferred financing costs | (597 | ) | - | |||||
Other income (expense), net | (289 | ) | (295 | ) | ||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | (16,493 | ) | $ | (8,331 | ) |
Management evaluates the operating results of our two segments based upon adjusted operating income, which is pre-tax operating income before costs related to amortization of acquired intangibles, share-based compensation, restructuring charges, business acquisition and divestiture related expenses and the impact of any acquisition related adjustments. We have set out above our adjusted operating income by segment and in the aggregate, and have provided a reconciliation of adjusted operating income to operating income on a GAAP basis and income (loss) before income taxes for the periods presented.
13 |
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Unless the context requires otherwise, (i) “we”, “our”, “us”, or the “Company” refer to Aeroflex Holding Corp. and subsidiaries, (ii) “Sponsors” refers collectively to affiliates of or funds managed by The Veritas Capital Fund III, L.P., Golden Gate Private Equity, Inc., and GS Direct, L.L.C., which indirectly control the Company, and (iii) “fiscal” refers to the twelve months ended June 30 of the applicable year. For example, “fiscal 2012” refers to the twelve months ended June 30, 2012.
Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains "forward-looking statements". All statements other than statements of historical fact are "forward-looking" statements for purposes of the U.S. federal and state securities laws. These statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "anticipate", "believe", "continue", "could", "estimate", "expect", "intend", "may", "might", "plan", "potential", "predict", "should" or "will" or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology.
We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections. While we believe these expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections are reasonable, such forward-looking statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. These and other important factors may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. A listing of some of the key factors that could cause actual results to differ from our expectations is included under the caption “Risk Factors” in our fiscal 2012 Form 10-K.
Given these risks and uncertainties, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included in this report are made only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, either to reflect new developments, or for any other reason, except as required by law.
Overview
Company Background
We are a leading global provider of RF and microwave integrated circuits, components and systems used in the design, development and maintenance of technically demanding, high-performance wireless communication systems. Our solutions include highly specialized microelectronic components and test and measurement equipment used by companies in the (i) space, avionics, defense; (ii) commercial wireless communications; and (iii) medical and other markets. We have targeted customers in these end markets because we believe our solutions address their technically demanding requirements. We were founded in 1937 and have proprietary technology that is based on extensive know-how and a long history of research and development focused on specialized technologies, often in collaboration with our customers.
Business Segments
Our business segments and major products included in each segment are as follows:
Microelectronic Solutions (“AMS”)
· | HiRel microelectronics/semiconductors |
· | RF and microwave components |
· | Mixed-signal/digital ASICs |
· | Motion control products |
14 |
Test Solutions (“ATS”)
· | Wireless test equipment |
· | Military radio and Private Mobile Radio, or PMR, test equipment |
· | Avionics test equipment |
· | Synthetic test equipment |
· | General purpose test equipment |
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our historical results of operations as a percentage of net sales for the periods indicated below:
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Net sales | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||
Cost of sales | 51.2 | 49.3 | ||||||
Gross profit | 48.8 | 50.7 | ||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||
Selling, general and administrative costs | 25.3 | 23.9 | ||||||
Research and development costs | 14.8 | 15.7 | ||||||
Amortization of acquired intangibles | 10.3 | 10.2 | ||||||
Restructuring charges | 2.3 | 0.3 | ||||||
Change in fair value of acquisition contingent consideration liability | - | 0.3 | ||||||
Total operating expenses | 52.7 | 50.4 | ||||||
Operating income (loss) | (3.9 | ) | 0.3 | |||||
Other income (expense): | ||||||||
Interest expense | (7.1 | ) | (5.5 | ) | ||||
Write-off of deferred financing costs | (0.4 | ) | - | |||||
Other income (expense), net | (0.2 | ) | (0.2 | ) | ||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | (11.6 | ) | (5.4 | ) | ||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | (1.7 | ) | (2.1 | ) | ||||
Net income (loss) | (9.9 | )% | (3.3 | )% |
15 |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2011
The end markets that we operate in continue to be challenged by macro-economic factors, including the European financial crisis and uncertainty over U.S. government spending, both of which have caused customers to be more conservative with their buying patterns.
Our experienced senior management team constantly reviews the Company’s operations, continually looks for additional efficiencies and is not hesitant to take the actions needed to improve the Company’s profitability based on our current level of business. For instance, during fiscal 2012 we initiated cost saving measures by reducing personnel at various locations worldwide. These activities continued in the first quarter of fiscal 2013, primarily with the reorganization of our European ATS business to make its operations more focused and appropriate for the sales level that we are currently experiencing, as well as positioning us for the opportunity to achieve future growth.
Net Sales. Net sales decreased $13.7 million, or 9%, to $141.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 from $154.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011.
Net Sales | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months | % of | % of | ||||||||||||||||||||
Ended | Consolidated | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | AMS | Net Sales | ATS | Net Sales | Total | |||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | $ | 74,450 | 52.7 | % | $ | 66,703 | 47.3 | % | $ | 141,153 | ||||||||||||
2011 | $ | 81,805 | 52.8 | % | $ | 73,079 | 47.2 | % | $ | 154,884 |
Net sales in the AMS segment decreased $7.4 million, or 9%, to $74.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 from $81.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011. This sales decrease was primarily attributable to volume driven reductions of HiRel microelectronics/semiconductors due to program delays, combined with government budgetary constraints on defense and space programs; mixed-signal/digital Application Specific Integrated Circuits (“ASICs”); and motion control products.
Net sales in the ATS segment decreased $6.4 million, or 9%, to $66.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 from $73.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011. The decrease was attributable to a large shipment of radio test sets in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, not repeated in fiscal 2013, and a volume driven reduction in sales of avionics test equipment.
Gross Profit. Gross profit equals net sales less cost of sales. Cost of sales includes materials, direct labor, amortization of capitalized software development costs and overhead expenses such as engineering labor, fringe benefits, depreciation, allocable occupancy costs and manufacturing supplies.
16 |
On a consolidated basis, gross profit was $68.9 million, or 48.8% of net sales, for the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $78.5 million, or 50.7% of net sales, for the three months ended September 30, 2011.
Gross Profit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months | % of | % of | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended | Net | Net | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | AMS | Sales | ATS | Sales | Total | Sales | ||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | $ | 36,449 | 49.0 | % | $ | 32,450 | 48.6 | % | $ | 68,899 | 48.8 | % | ||||||||||||||
2011 | $ | 41,022 | 50.1 | % | $ | 37,497 | 51.3 | % | $ | 78,519 | 50.7 | % |
Gross margins in the AMS segment were 49.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 50.1% for the three months ended September 30, 2011. Gross profit decreased $4.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2011 largely due to the reduction in sales. The decrease in gross margin is principally attributable to product mix.
Gross margins in the ATS segment were 48.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 51.3% for the three months ended September 30, 2011. Gross profit decreased $5.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2011 largely due to the reduction in sales. The decrease in gross margin is principally attributable to product mix.
Selling, General and Administrative Costs. Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) costs include office and management salaries, fringe benefits, commissions, insurance and professional fees.
On a consolidated basis, SG&A costs decreased $1.4 million when comparing the three months ended September 30, 2012 to the three months ended September 30, 2011, primarily due to cost reductions in Europe of $1.2 million. The reduction in sales caused SG&A, as a percentage of sales, to increase from 24.0% to 25.3% when comparing the three months ended September 30, 2011 to the three months ended September 30, 2012.
Selling, General and Administrative Costs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months | % of | % of | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended | Net | Net | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | AMS | Sales | ATS | Sales | Corporate | Total | Sales | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | $ | 12,271 | 16.5 | % | $ | 18,296 | 27.4 | % | $ | 5,136 | $ | 35,703 | 25.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | $ | 13,023 | 15.9 | % | $ | 20,019 | 27.4 | % | $ | 4,089 | $ | 37,131 | 23.9 | % |
Research and Development Costs. Research and development costs include materials, engineering labor and allocated overhead.
On a consolidated basis, research and development costs decreased $3.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 from the three months ended September 30, 2011.
17 |
Research and Development Costs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months | % of | % of | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||
Ended | Net | Net | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | AMS | Sales | ATS | Sales | Total | Sales | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | $ | 8,882 | 11.9 | % | $ | 11,996 | 18.0 | % | $ | 20,878 | 14.8 | % | ||||||||||||
2011 | $ | 8,649 | 10.6 | % | $ | 15,626 | 21.4 | % | $ | 24,275 | 15.7 | % |
Research and development costs in the ATS segment decreased $3.6 million, primarily due to the reduction of R&D contract engineering headcount by 65 people in conjunction with the completion of wireless related development projects near the end of fiscal 2012.
Restructuring Charges. On a consolidated basis, restructuring charges were $3.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $436,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011. The restructuring charges wereprimarily related to cost savings initiatives which resulted in reductions in personnel at various locations worldwide.
The AMS segment incurred total restructuring costs of $204,000 and $376,000 in the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
The ATS segment incurred restructuring costs related to the reorganization of our European operations of $3.1 million and $60,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased by $1.5 million to $10.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 from $8.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011. Interest expense increased as a result of the 150 basis point increase in our interest rate on May 24, 2012, partially offset by a lower outstanding principal amount due to voluntary debt payments of $80 million in the latter half of fiscal 2012 and $25 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012.
Income Taxes. The income tax benefit was $2.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 on a pre-tax loss of $16.5 million. We recorded an income tax benefit for the three months ended September 30, 2011 of $3.3 million on a pre-tax loss of $8.3 million. The effective income tax rate for both periods differed from the amount computed by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate to income before taxes primarily due to foreign, state and local income taxes, including U.S. income tax on certain foreign net income that we anticipate will be repatriated to the U.S.
The income tax benefit for the three months ended September 30, 2012 reflects a discrete benefit of $116,000 relating to a statutory income tax rate reduction in the U.K. and a reduction of a deferred tax liability related to the repatriation of funds from our Chinese subsidiary largely offset by a true-up of a deferred tax item in the U.K. The income tax benefit for the three months ended September 30, 2011 reflects a discrete benefit of $700,000 relating to a reduction in the statutory income tax rate in the U.K.
Absent the discrete items, the effective tax rates were 14% and 31% for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The current year’s provision was a combination of projected annual U.S. tax benefit on a domestic book loss and foreign tax expense on foreign earnings. The prior year’s provision was a combination of projected annual U.S. tax expense on domestic earnings and foreign tax expense on foreign earnings. The resulting projected net consolidated income tax rate was applied against year-to-date pre-tax income to arrive at the year-to-date provision before adjustment for discrete items.
In the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we paid income taxes of $1.2 million and $3.5 million, respectively.
18 |
Net Income (Loss). Net income (loss) was $(14.1) million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and $(5.0) million for the three months ended September 30, 2011.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of September 30, 2012, we had $45.2 million of cash and cash equivalents, $262.1 million in working capital and our current ratio was 3.55 to 1, versus $41.3 million, $289.2 million and 3.70 to 1, respectively, at June 30, 2012.
Our principal liquidity requirements are to service our debt and interest and meet our working capital and capital expenditure needs. As of September 30, 2012, we had $616.4 million of debt outstanding, all of which was long-term, under the senior secured term loan. Additionally, at September 30, 2012, we were able to borrow $75.0 million under the revolving portion of our senior secured credit facility, of which none was outstanding.
During the three months ended September 30, 2012, we had accumulated cash in excess of our forecasted operating needs. Consistent with our objective to reduce the outstanding term loan balance and reduce our ongoing interest expense, we voluntarily prepaid a total of $25.0 million of our term loan during the three months ended September 30, 2012.
As a result of prepayments made to date, there are no required debt principal payments due until fiscal 2018.
As of September 30, 2012, we were in compliance with all of the covenants contained in our debt agreement. Certain loan covenants are based on Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA (net income (loss), before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization) adjusted to add back or subtract certain non-cash, non-recurring and other items, as permitted by various provisions in our debt agreement. Our use of the term Adjusted EBITDA may vary from others in our industry. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not measures of operating income (loss), performance or liquidity under U.S. GAAP and are subject to important limitations. A reconciliation of net income (loss), which is a U.S. GAAP measure of our operating results, to Adjusted EBITDA, as defined in our debt agreement, is as follows:
19 |
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (14,139 | ) | $ | (5,042 | ) | ||
Interest expense | 10,078 | 8,574 | ||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | (2,354 | ) | (3,289 | ) | ||||
Depreciation and amortization | 20,123 | 20,974 | ||||||
EBITDA | 13,708 | 21,217 | ||||||
Restructuring costs and related pro forma savings(a) | 3,702 | 3,002 | ||||||
Share-based compensation | 636 | 600 | ||||||
Change in fair value of acquisition contingent consideration liability | - | 403 | ||||||
Write-off of deferred financing costs | 597 | - | ||||||
Other defined items(b) | 797 | 489 | ||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 19,440 | $ | 25,711 | ||||
(a) | Primarily reflects costs associated with the reorganization of our European operations and consolidation of certain of our U.S. component facilities. Pro forma savings reflect the costs that we estimate would have been eliminated during the fiscal year in which a restructuring occurred had the restructuring occurred as of the first day of that fiscal year. Pro forma savings were estimated to be $434,000 and $2.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The pro forma savings of $2.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 were not reflected in our Adjusted EBITDA as reported in our September 30, 2011 report on Form 10-Q as they relate to restructuring activities recorded throughout fiscal 2012. |
(b) | Reflects other adjustments required in calculating our debt covenant compliance. These other defined items include legal fees related to litigation and business acquisition and divestiture related costs. |
Financial covenants in our senior secured credit facility include a maximum leverage ratio of total debt (less up to $15.0 million of unrestricted cash) to Adjusted EBITDA, as defined in our senior secured credit facility. The maximum leverage ratio permitted for the twelve months ended September 30, 2012 was 5.75, whereas our actual leverage ratio was 4.80. The maximum leverage ratio permitted periodically decreases as follows:
20 |
Effective as of | Maximum | |||
the Twelve Months | Permitted | |||
Ending | Leverage Ratio | |||
March 31, 2013 | 5.50 | |||
September 30, 2013 | 5.25 | |||
March 31, 2014 | 5.00 | |||
June 30, 2014 | 4.50 | |||
September 30, 2014 | 4.00 | |||
December 31, 2014 | 3.75 | |||
March 31, 2015 | 3.50 |
We believe that, for the balance of fiscal 2013, we will continue to be in compliance with the leverage ratio.
Our senior secured credit facility contains restrictions on our activities, including but not limited to covenants that restrict us and our restricted subsidiaries, as defined in our senior secured credit facility, from:
· | incurring additional indebtedness and issuing disqualified stock or preferred stock; |
· | making certain investments or other restricted payments; |
· | paying dividends and making other distributions with respect to capital stock, or repurchasing, redeeming or retiring capital stock or subordinated debt; |
· | selling or otherwise disposing of assets; |
· | under certain circumstances, issuing or selling equity interests; |
· | creating liens on our assets; |
· | consolidating or merging with, or acquiring in excess of specified annual limitations, another business, or selling or disposing of all or substantially all of our assets; and |
· | entering into certain transactions with our affiliates. |
If for any reason we fail to comply with the covenants in the senior secured credit facility, we would be in default under the terms of the agreements governing our outstanding debt. If such a default were to occur, the lenders under the senior secured credit facility could elect to declare all amounts outstanding thereunder immediately due and payable, and the lenders would not be obligated to continue to advance funds to us. If the amounts outstanding under these debt agreements are accelerated, our assets may not be sufficient to repay in full the amounts owed.
We expect that cash generated from operating activities and availability under the revolving portion of our new senior secured credit facility will be our principal sources of liquidity. Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness and to fund working capital needs and planned capital expenditures will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future. This, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive and other factors that are beyond our control. In addition, to the extent we have consolidated excess cash flows, as defined in the credit agreement governing the senior secured credit facility, we must use specified portions of the excess cash flows to prepay the senior secured credit facility. Based on our current level of operations, we believe our cash flow from operations and available borrowings under our senior secured credit facility will be adequate to meet our liquidity needs for at least the next twelve months. We cannot assure you, however, that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations, or that future borrowings will be available in an amount sufficient to enable us to repay our indebtedness at maturity or to fund other liquidity needs. We may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness on or before the maturity thereof. We cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms or at all.
21 |
Cash Flows
For the three months ended September 30, 2012, our cash flow provided by operations was $32.0 million, which included cash generated by reductions in accounts receivable of $33.0 million. Our investing activities used cash of $3.8 million, primarily for capital expenditures of $4.1 million. Our financing activities used cash of $25.0 million, primarily for voluntary debt prepayments.
For the three months ended September 30, 2011, our cash flow used by operations was $1.2 million. Our investing activities used cash of $4.7 million, virtually all for capital expenditures. Our financing activities used cash of $1.9 million, primarily for debt repayments.
Capital Expenditures
Capital expenditures were $4.1 million and $4.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Our capital expenditures primarily consist of equipment replacements.
Contractual Obligations
There have been no material changes in our contractual obligations as disclosed in our fiscal 2012 Form 10-K.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not maintain any off-balance sheet arrangements, transactions, obligations or other relationships with unconsolidated entities that would be expected to have material current or future effect upon our results of operations or financial condition.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Information regarding our critical accounting policies and estimates appears within the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our fiscal 2012 Form 10-K. During the three month period ended September 30, 2012, there were no significant changes to any critical accounting policies or to the related estimates and judgments involved in applying those policies.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For information with respect to recent accounting pronouncements and the impact of these pronouncements on our consolidated financial statements, see Note 1 of Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report.
22 |
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk. We are subject to interest rate risk in connection with borrowings under our senior secured credit facility. We currently do not have interest rate swap agreements hedging this debt. As of September 30, 2012, there was $616.4 million outstanding at adjusted LIBOR plus 4.5% under the term-loan portion of the senior secured credit facility, all of which is subject to variable interest rates. The adjusted LIBOR, as defined in the senior secured credit facility, has a floor of 1.25% on the term loan. Based on LIBOR at September 30, 2012, an increase of 1% in interest rates would result in a 0.11% increase, due to the 1.25% floor, or a $687,000 increase in our annual interest expense. Any 1% increase in interest rates above the 1.25% floor would result in a $6.2 million increase in our annual interest expense. A 1% change in interest rates would result in a $760,000 change in our annual interest expense on the revolving loan borrowings, assuming the entire $75.0 million was outstanding. Any debt we incur in the future may also bear interest at floating rates.
Foreign Currency Risk. Foreign currency contracts are used to protect us from exchange rate fluctuation from the time customers are invoiced in local currency until such currency is exchanged for U.S. dollars. We periodically enter into foreign currency contracts, which are not designated as hedges, and the change in the fair value is included in income currently within other income (expense). As of September 30, 2012, we had $31.4 million of notional value foreign currency forward contracts maturing through October 31, 2012. Notional amounts do not quantify risk or represent assets or liabilities, but are used in the calculation of cash settlements under the contracts. The fair value of these contracts at September 30, 2012 was a liability of $2,000. If foreign currency exchange rates (primarily the British pound and the Euro) change by 10% from the levels at September 30, 2012, the effect on our comprehensive income would be approximately $15.9 million.
Inflation Risk. Inflation has not had a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition during the preceding three years.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our disclosure controls and procedures under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our disclosure controls and procedures are also designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our Principal Executive Officer and our Principal Financial Officer, with the assistance from other members of management, have reviewed the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2012 and, based on their evaluation, have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of such date.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
23 |
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
There have been no material changes in our legal proceedings disclosed in our fiscal 2012 Form 10-K.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in our risk factors disclosed in our fiscal 2012 Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable
Item 5. Other Information
None
24 |
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit No. | Exhibit Description | |
10.1 | Executive Employment Agreement, entered into as of September 28, 2012, by and between Aeroflex Incorporated and Andrew F. Kaminsky (incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 3, 2012). | |
10.2 | Amendment No. 6 to Employment Agreement, dated as of September 28, 2012, by and between Aeroflex Incorporated and John Adamovich, Jr. (incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 3, 2012).
| |
10.3 | Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement, dated as of September 28, 2012, by and between Aeroflex Incorporated and Edward S. Wactlar (incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 3, 2012).
| |
31.1 | Certification pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14a as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Chief Executive Officer)
| |
31.2 | Certification pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14a as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Chief Financial Officer)
| |
31.3 | Certification pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14a as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Principal Accounting Officer)
| |
32.1 | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Chief Executive Officer)
| |
32.2 | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Chief Financial Officer)
| |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document
| |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
| |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
| |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
| |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
| |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
25 |
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
AEROFLEX HOLDING CORP. |
/s/ John Adamovich, Jr. | |
John Adamovich, Jr. | |
Senior Vice President and | |
Chief Financial Officer | |
(Principal Financial Officer) |
November 8, 2012
26 |
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. | Exhibit Description | |
10.1 | Executive Employment Agreement, entered into as of September 28, 2012, by and between Aeroflex Incorporated and Andrew F. Kaminsky (incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 3, 2012). | |
10.2 | Amendment No. 6 to Employment Agreement, dated as of September 28, 2012, by and between Aeroflex Incorporated and John Adamovich, Jr. (incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 3, 2012).
| |
10.3 | Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement, dated as of September 28, 2012, by and between Aeroflex Incorporated and Edward S. Wactlar (incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 3, 2012).
| |
31.1 | Certification pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14a as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Chief Executive Officer)
| |
31.2 | Certification pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14a as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Chief Financial Officer)
| |
31.3 | Certification pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14a as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Principal Accounting Officer)
| |
32.1 | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Chief Executive Officer)
| |
32.2 | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Chief Financial Officer)
| |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
27 |