Edgar Filing: GUARANTY BANCSHARES INC /TX/

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)
x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004

OR

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 0-23113

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Texas		75-1656431
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S.Employer Identification Number)


100 West Arkansas Mount Pleasant, Texas		75455
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(903) 572-9881

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, par value
$1.00 per share

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

As of February 18, 2005, the number of outstanding shares of Common Stock was 2,912,677. As of June 30, 2004, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the shares of Common Stock held by non-affiliates, based on the closing price of the Common Stock on the Nasdaq National Market System on such date, was approximately $25.3 million.

Documents Incorporated by Reference:

Portions of the Company’s Proxy Statement relating to the 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be filed within 120 days after December 31, 2004, are incorporated by reference into Part III, Items 10-14 of this Form 10-K.

Message

F INANCIAL INFORMATION

2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K

Part I

Item 1.	Business	- 2 -
Item 2.	Properties	- 14 -
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	- 14 -
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	- 15 -

Part II

Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	- 15 -
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	- 18 -
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	- 20 -
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	- 45 -
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	- 47 -
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	- 49 -
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	- 49 -
Item 9B.	Other Items	- 49 -

Part III

Item 10.	Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant	- 49 -
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	- 49 -
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management	- 50 -
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions	- 50 -
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	- 50 -

Part IV

Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	- 50 -
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		- F-2 -
Consolidated Balance Sheets		- F-3 -
Consolidated Statements of Earnings		- F-4 -
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity		- F-5 -
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		- F-6 -
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		- F-7 -

PART I

Item 1. Business

General

Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated as a business corporation under the laws of the State of Texas in 1980 to serve as a holding company for Guaranty Bond Bank, formally known as Guaranty Bank, (the “Bank”), which was chartered in 1913, and for Talco State Bank, which was chartered in 1912 and merged into the Bank in 1997. The Company’s headquarters are located at 100 West Arkansas, Mount Pleasant, Texas 75455, and its telephone number is (903) 572-9881.

The Company has grown through a combination of internal growth, the acquisition of community banks and the opening of new community banking offices. In 1992, the Company established its Deport, Texas location by acquiring certain assets and liabilities of the First National Bank of Deport (the “Deport Bank”). The Deport Bank also had a branch in Paris, Texas, which the Company acquired. To enhance its expansion into the Paris community, in 1994 the Company constructed a new facility to serve as its Paris location. In 2001, the Paris facility was expanded from approximately 5,400 square feet to approximately 9,700 square feet, again to service the expanded customer base. In 1993, the Company purchased a commercial bank in Bogata, Texas and in 1996 opened a second retail-service banking facility in Mount Pleasant. In 1997, the Company merged Talco State Bank into the Bank and opened a full-service location in Texarkana. In 1998, the Company completed a new facility in Texarkana to enhance its expansion in the Texarkana market. Texarkana is the center of a trade area encompassing approximately 130,000 people. Management of the Company continues to believe that this trade area provides opportunity for strong growth in loans and deposits. Texas Highway 59 (scheduled to become Interstate 69), which serves as the primary “NAFTA Highway” linking the interior United States and Mexico, is a main artery to Texarkana. The increased traffic along this NAFTA Highway is expected to enhance economic activity in this area and create more opportunities for growth.

In 1999, the Company opened a full-service location in Pittsburg, Texas, a community of approximately 4,500 people located 12 miles from Mount Pleasant. Also in 1999, the Company acquired the First American Financial Corporation, with banking locations in Sulphur Springs and Commerce, Texas and a wholly owned mortgage company. In 2000, the operations of the mortgage subsidiary, which were being continued by the Company under the name Guaranty Mortgage Company, were merged into the Bank. Also in August 2000, the Company opened a loan production office in Fort Stockton, Texas, located in the western portion of Texas, which became a full-service bank in December of 2000. As of December 31, 2004, product offerings at the Fort Stockton location are limited to loans and time deposits. In August of 2004, the Company closed its Deport, Texas location. All Deport customers were transferred to either the Paris location, 12 miles to the north, or the Bogata location, 10 miles to the south. Management believes that the Company retained 95% of the Deport customer base. In August of 2004, the Company opened its second retail-service banking facility in Texarkana. In November 2004, the Company opened a full-service location in Mount Vernon, Texas, a community of approximately 3,000 people located 15 miles west of Mount Pleasant. Both of the new locations opened in 2004 are operating out of temporary facilities with plans to complete permanent facilities in 2005.

The Company has developed a community-banking network, with most of its offices located in separate communities. Lending and investment activities are funded from a strong core deposit base consisting of approximately 40,000 deposit accounts as of December 31, 2004. Each of the Company’s offices has the authority and flexibility to make pricing decisions within overall ranges developed by the Company as a form of quality control. Management of the Company believes that its responsiveness to local customers and ability to adjust deposit rates and price loans at each location gives it a distinct competitive advantage. Employees are committed to personal service and developing long-term customer relationships, and adequate staffing is provided at each location to ensure that customers’ needs are well addressed. The Company provides economic incentives to its employees to develop additional business for the Company and to cross-sell additional products and services to existing customers.

The Bank owns interests in five entities which complement the Company’s business, the first three of which are wholly-owned: (i) Guaranty Leasing Company (“Guaranty Leasing”), which finances equipment leases and has engaged in certain leveraged lease transactions; (ii) Guaranty Company, which owns real estate for future Bank expansion; (iii) GB Com, Inc., a nominee company; (iv) BSC Securities, L.C. (“BSC”), which provides brokerage services; and, (v) Independent Bank Services, L.C. (“IBS”), which performs compliance, loan review, internal audit and EDP audit functions. These entities are accounted for in the Company’s consolidated financial statements using the equity method of accounting and are included in other assets on the balance sheet.

Business

The Company’s guiding strategy is to increase shareholder value by providing customers with individualized, responsive, quality service and to augment its existing market share. The Company’s main objective is to increase loans and deposits through additional expansion opportunities in Texas, while stressing efficiency and maximizing profitability. In furtherance of this objective, the Company has employed the following operating strategies:

Focus On Community Banking. The Company has developed a reputation of being a premier provider of financial services to small and medium-sized businesses, professionals and individuals in Northeast Texas. Management believes the Company’s reputation for providing personal, professional and dependable service is well established in communities located in this area. Each of the Company’s full-service branch locations is administered by a local President who has knowledge of the particular community and lending expertise in the specific industries found in the community, whether it is agriculture, manufacturing and commerce or professional services. Decisions regarding loans and deposits are made at each location, enabling the Company to provide timely decisions on lending issues.

Continue Controlled Core Growth. The Company has increased its deposit market share in each of the communities in which it maintains a full-service banking center. In 2004, total deposits grew $25.9 million, or 6.3%. Growth was experienced in non-interest bearing checking accounts of $10.1 million, or 14%, interest-bearing checking accounts of $5.7 million, or 12.7%, and money market accounts of $8.2 million, or 13.8%. The larger growth markets were Mount Pleasant, Paris, Texarkana and Commerce. In its principal location of Mount Pleasant, the Company’s market share of financial institution deposits, based on the FDIC Deposit Market Share data as of June 30, 2004, was approximately 40.8%, the largest single financial institution in that market. This same data showed gains in market share of other markets with total market share for the Commerce location at 5.1%, Pittsburg at 9.4%, Sulphur Springs at 14.9%, Paris at 11.3%, and Bogata at 13.5%. The Company is well known in its geographic area as a result of its longevity and reputation for service. The Company continues to look for additional expansion opportunities, either through acquisitions of existing financial institutions or by establishing de novo offices. The Company intends to consider various strategic acquisitions of banks, banking assets or financial service entities related to banking in those areas that management believes would complement and help grow the Company’s existing business as well as servicing its existing customer base.

Enhance Technology. The Company has embraced technological change as a way to remain competitive, manage operational costs associated with growth and offer superior products to its customers. Recent technological additions include mailroom automation, Voice-Over-IP telephony, and Internet Banking enhancements. This adds to our existing electronic bill and note payment, note and document imaging, electronic report management, remote proof capture, electronic statement delivery, and an automated voice response system. Currently, the Company is evaluating several additional enhancements that will improve its ability to deliver information internally to improve productivity and externally to provide convenience and timeliness to its growing customer base. Such enhancements include consolidation of the various accounting systems the Bank uses, implementation of a new “Check 21” compatible teller system and electronic check/image presentment. The Company has made significant investments in technology.

Offer Full Range of Services and Products. The Company recognizes its competition is not solely banks, but brokerage houses, insurance companies, credit unions and various other financial service firms, and that in order to thrive it must be competitive in the products that it offers. The Company offers a full range of commercial loan products, including term loans, lines of credit, fixed asset loans, real estate loans and working capital loans. The Company also offers consumers a full range of personal loan products including automobile loans, home improvement loans, consumer loans and mortgage loans. In addition to loan products, the Company has a wide variety of deposit products, including a Premier Money Market Account that pays a rate competitive with most brokerage investment accounts. This product, coupled with certificates of deposit, NOW accounts, savings accounts, Internet banking with on-line bill pay, free checking, debit cards, ATM convenience and overdraft protection, gives the customer a full complement of deposit products at competitive rates.

Expand Revenue Sources. In order to provide service to its customers and to augment revenues, the Company offers brokerage services through BSC, a full-service brokerage company. BSC offers a complete array of investment options including stocks, bonds, mutual funds, financial and retirement planning, tax advantaged investments and asset allocations. These products are not FDIC insured. BSC offers securities through Southwest Securities, a Texas-based independent clearing firm and is licensed and regulated through the National Association of Securities Dealers, the Securities and Exchange Commission and various state and federal banking authorities. The Company’s Trust Department offers complete trust services, including estate administration and custody, trust and asset management services. Management believes that an aging affluent population will foster an increase in the need for professional estate administration services. The maturing of the baby boomer generation is creating a market for asset management services. The Trust Department is in a unique position since there is little competition for trust services in the Company’s markets. Because of the Company’s strong presence in its markets, management believes that banking relationships can be leveraged into growth for the Trust Department. In 2004, Trust Department assets under management increased $16.9 million, or 34.5%. Management expects that trust assets and corresponding management fees will grow as a result of expanding estate administration, traditional trust services, asset management services and custodial services in the Company’s markets.

Improve Operating Efficiencies. In order to control overhead expenses, the Company seeks to provide a full range of services as efficiently as possible. Through BSC, the Company is able to provide its customers with full brokerage services without having to carry the entire cost itself due to a shared cost agreement with other banks. Similarly, the Company enjoys the compliance and loan review functions provided by IBS on a shared cost basis with a group of other banks participating in this arrangement. The Company has spent the last ten years and considerable revenue expanding its market and improving the delivery of its financial products, which has resulted in a higher than desired efficiency ratio. Beginning with the acquisition of the Deport Bank in 1992, the Company has added twelve locations and closed one. As a result, the Company has not yet achieved the desired economies of scale, but with its growth rate, those economies are beginning to be realized and the efficiency ratio is expected to show improving trends in the future. Management believes the Company has the support staff and related fixed asset investments necessary to accommodate additional growth and realize economies of scale.

Training. An effective training program is critical to the Company’s success. The rapid growth experienced by the Company, changes in technology, changes in bank regulations, and staff development all contribute to the need for a strong training program. To this end, the Human Resource Manager has developed a formalized training program that focuses on technology, compliance, and operations.

Competition

The banking business is highly competitive, and the profitability of the Company depends principally on its ability to compete in the market areas in which its banking operations are located. The Company competes with other commercial banks, savings banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, finance companies, mutual funds, insurance companies, brokerage and investment banking firms, asset-based non-bank lenders and certain other non-financial entities, including retail stores which may maintain their own credit programs and certain governmental organizations which may offer more favorable financing than the Company. The Company has been able to compete effectively with other financial institutions by emphasizing customer service, technology and local office decision-making, by establishing long-term customer relationships and building customer loyalty, and by providing products and services designed to address the specific needs of its customers. Competition from both financial and non-financial institutions is expected to continue.

Leveraged Lease Transactions

In a series of transactions in 1992, 1994 and 1995, Guaranty Leasing acquired limited partnership interests in three different partnerships (collectively, the “Partnerships” or individually, the “1992 Partnership”, “1994 Partnership” and “1995 Partnership”, respectively) engaged in the equipment leasing business. The investments were structured by TransCapital Corporation (“TransCapital”) through various subsidiaries and controlled partnerships.

Generally, in each of the transactions, a partnership became the lessee of equipment from an equipment owner (pursuant to a sale and leaseback transaction) and the sublessor of the equipment to the equipment user. Each partnership receives note payments from the equipment owner under a purchase money note given to purchase the equipment from that partnership. The partnership makes lease payments to the equipment owner pursuant to the master lease of the equipment. In most instances, payments under the purchase money note equal lease payments under the master lease. Rental payments from the equipment used under these equipment subleases were sold in advance subject to existing liens for purchase of the equipment.

The partnership incurs a tax loss while the master lease/sublease structure is in place, primarily because deductions for rentals paid under the master lease exceed taxable interest income under the purchase money note. Consequently, Guaranty Leasing has reported tax losses as a result of its investments in the Partnerships, which were deductible by the Company. In November 1998, Guaranty Leasing was informed by the Internal Revenue Service (the “Service”) that it has taken the position that certain losses taken by the “1992 Partnership” during 1994, 1995 and 1996 of $302,000, $410,000 and $447,000, respectively, would be disallowed. In October 2001, Guaranty Leasing was informed by the Service that it has taken the position that certain losses taken by that Partnership during 1997 of $487,000 would also be disallowed. In September 2002, the Company received from the Service a Notice of Final Partnership Administrative Adjustment disallowing these deductions. Based upon the advice of counsel, the Company believes that it has correctly reported these transactions for tax purposes and that it has obtained appropriate legal, accounting and appraisal opinions and authority to support its positions. The Company recorded and expensed the tax affect of the disallowed deductions in 2002.

In February 2003, the Company filed a petition to begin the process to litigate the matter in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas the (“Texas Court”). In October 2003, the Government filed a Motion to Transfer Venue from the “Texas Court” to the United States District Court for the Eastern District for Virginia, (the “Virginia Court”) but in the alternative, claimed the “Texas Court” had no jurisdiction to hear the case. In November 2003, the Government filed a Motion to Stay Proceedings. In December 2003, and still in effect, the “Texas Court” issued an Order to Stay Proceedings pending the Court’s ruling on the Government’s Motion to Transfer Venue.

In June 2004 in a similar case, of which the Company is not a party, the Government filed a brief with the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“the Federal Circuit”) essentially agreeing and concluding that Section 6226(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code is a venue provision and not a jurisdictional provision. This is the same position of the Company in its pending litigation against the Government in the “Texas Court”. In July 2004, the “Texas Court” granted a Motion to Continue Hearing on the United States Opposed Motion to Transfer Venue. The “Texas Court” and the Company are currently awaiting a ruling from the “Federal Circuit” on the jurisdictional v. venue issue.

As of December 31, 2004, the “Federal Circuit” has not made a definitive ruling on the issue of whether Section 6226(a)(2) is jurisdictional or whether the statute is merely a venue provision. It is anticipated by legal counsel that given the Government’s change of position, the “Federal Circuit” will determine that Section 6226(a)(2) addresses the issue of venue and not jurisdiction; but a definitive answer must await a ruling from the “Federal Circuit”. Oral arguments were presented to the “Federal Circuit” in October 2004 and it is anticipated that a ruling will be issued within the near future.

In March 2004, the Company was informed by the Service that it had taken the position that certain losses taken by the “1994 Partnership” during the tax years of 1994 through 1999 would be disallowed and tax owed totaling $438,579 would be assessed. As of December 31, 2004, the Company has not received a Notice of Final Partnership Administrative Adjustment on this Partnership. Based upon the advice of counsel, the Company believes that it has correctly reported these transactions for tax purposes and that it has obtained appropriate legal, accounting and appraisal opinions and authority to support its positions.

In addition to the ongoing litigation regarding these Partnerships, the Service is currently in the process of examining the tax deductions taken for the “1995 Partnership”. No determination has been made regarding the disallowance of similar deductions taken by this Partnership. Should the Service ultimately disallow the related tax deductions taken during the remaining years of the “1992 Partnership” as well as the other two Partnerships, the Company will be required to recognize an additional maximum tax liability of approximately $3.9 million plus possible penalty and interest. The Company is actively contesting the position of the Service in connection with this matter, and has taken and will continue to take, appropriate steps necessary to protect its legal position. Any final determination with respect to the Partnerships will be binding on the Company.

During the year ended December 31, 2000, Guaranty Leasing acquired for approximately $2.8 million, a 2.5% ownership interest in an Aircraft Finance Trust (“AFT”), a special purpose business trust formed to acquire, finance, refinance, own, lease, sublease, sell and maintain aircraft. AFT was created by General Electric Capital Corporation, and is a financing transaction through which airlines lease aircraft. AFT is a business trust formed in 1999 under the laws of the state of Delaware, and it leases aircraft to airlines around the world. The senior notes issued to AFT are rated AA by Standard and Poors and the notes are secured by the cash flow from the aircraft leases. The notes mature in 2024.

Prior to 2004, on belief that the Company’s investment in AFT was impaired by declines in air travel, the uncertainly surrounding the airline industry, the limited marketability of the AFT investment, and general economic conditions, impairment charges of approximately $1.6 million were recorded and the carrying amount of the investment was reduced to $1.4 million. During 2004, an impairment charge of $120,000 was recorded. The book value of the AFT investment at December 31, 2004 was $1.3 million.

Employees

As of December 31, 2004, the Company had 224 full-time employees and 21 part-time employees, 87 of whom were officers of the Bank. All employees are non-union employees. The Company considers its relations with employees to be excellent.

Supervision and Regulation

The supervision and regulation of bank holding companies and their subsidiaries is intended primarily for the protection of depositors, the deposit insurance funds of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the banking system as a whole, and not for the protection of the bank holding company shareholders or creditors. The banking agencies have broad enforcement power over bank holding companies and banks including the power to impose substantial fines and other penalties for violations of laws and regulations.

The following description summarizes some of the laws to which the Company and the Bank are subject. References in the following description to applicable statutes and regulations are brief summaries of these statutes and regulations, do not purport to be complete, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to such statutes and regulations.

The Company. The Company is a bank holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHC Act”), and it is subject to supervision, regulation and examination by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve”). The BHC Act and other federal laws subject bank holding companies to particular restrictions on the types of activities in which they may engage, and to a range of supervisory requirements and activities, including regulatory enforcement actions for violations of laws and regulations.

Regulatory Restrictions on Dividends; Source of Strength. It is the policy of the Federal Reserve that bank holding companies should pay cash dividends on common stock only out of income available over the past year and only if prospective earnings retention is consistent with the organization’s expected future needs and financial condition. The policy provides that bank holding companies should not maintain a level of cash dividends that undermines the bank holding company’s ability to serve as a source of strength to its banking subsidiaries.

Under Federal Reserve policy, a bank holding company is expected to act as a source of financial strength to each of its banking subsidiaries and commit resources to their support. Such support may be required at times when, absent this Federal Reserve policy, a holding company may not be inclined to provide it. As discussed below, a bank holding company in certain circumstances could be required to guarantee the capital plan of an undercapitalized banking subsidiary.

In the event of a bank holding company’s bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, the trustee will be deemed to have assumed and is required to cure immediately any deficit under any commitment by the debtor holding company to any of the federal banking agencies to maintain the capital of an insured depository institution, and any claim for breach of such obligation will generally have priority over most other unsecured claims.

Scope of Permissible Activities. Under the BHC Act, bank holding companies generally may not acquire a direct or indirect interest in, or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of, any company that is not a bank or bank holding company, or engage in activities other than those of banking, managing or controlling banks or furnishing services to or performing services for its subsidiaries, except that it may engage in, directly or indirectly, various activities that the Federal Reserve has determined to be so closely related to banking or managing and controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. In approving acquisitions or the addition of activities, the Federal Reserve considers whether the acquisition or the additional activities can reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, that outweigh such possible adverse effects as undue concentration of resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interest or unsound banking practices.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, effective in 2000, eliminated the barriers to affiliations among banks, securities firms, insurance companies and other financial service providers, and permits bank holding companies to become financial holding companies and thereby affiliate with securities firms and insurance companies and engage in other activities that are financial in nature. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act defines “financial in nature” to include securities underwriting, dealing and market making, sponsoring mutual funds and investment companies, insurance underwriting and agency, merchant banking activities, and activities that the Federal Reserve has determined to be closely related to banking. No regulatory approval is generally required for a financial holding company to acquire a company, other than a bank or savings association, engaged in activities that are financial in nature or incidental to activities that are financial in nature, as determined by the Federal Reserve.

Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, a bank holding company may become a financial holding company by filing a declaration with the Federal Reserve Board if each of its subsidiary banks is well capitalized under FDICIA prompt corrective action provisions, is well managed, and has at least a satisfactory rating under the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (CRA).

While the Federal Reserve Board serves as the “umbrella” regulator for financial holding companies and has the power to examine banking organizations engaged in new activities, regulation and supervision of activities which are financial in nature or determined to be incidental to such financial activities are handled along functional lines. Accordingly, activities of subsidiaries of a financial holding company are regulated by the agency or authorities with the most experience regulating that activity as it is conducted in a financial holding company.

USA Patriot Act and Privacy Regulations. On October 26, 2001, President Bush signed the USA Patriot Act of 2001. Enacted in response to the terrorist attacks in New York, Pennsylvania and Washington, D.C. on September 11, 2001, the Patriot Act is intended to strengthen U.S. law enforcement’s and the intelligence communities’ ability to work cohesively to combat terrorism on a variety of fronts. The potential impact of the Act on financial institutions of all kinds is significant and wide ranging. The Patriot Act contains sweeping anti-money laundering and financial transparency laws and requires various regulations, including:

	•	due diligence requirements for financial institutions that administer, maintain or manage private bank accounts or correspondent accounts for non-U.S. persons;

	•	standards for verifying customer identification at account opening;

	•	rules to promote cooperation among financial institutions, regulators, and law enforcement entities in identifying parties that may be involved in terrorism or money laundering;

	•	reports by non-financial trades and businesses filed with the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network for transactions exceeding $10,000; and,

	•	filing of suspicious activities reports regarding securities by brokers and dealers if they believe a customer may be violating U.S. laws and regulations.

Under the Financial Services Modernization Act, federal banking regulators adopted rules that limit the ability of banks and other financial institutions to disclose non-public information about consumers to nonaffiliated third parties. Pursuant to the rules, financial institutions must provide:

	•	initial notices to customers about their privacy policies, describing the conditions under which they may disclose non-public personal information to nonaffiliated third parties and affiliates;

	•	annual notices of their privacy policies to current customers; and,

	•	a reasonable method for customers to “opt out” of disclosures to nonaffiliated third parties.

These privacy provisions will affect how customer information is transmitted through diversified financial companies and conveyed to outside vendors. Management believes the privacy positions have not had a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

Safe and Sound Banking Practices. Bank holding companies are not permitted to engage in unsafe and unsound banking practices. The Federal Reserve’s Regulation Y, for example, generally requires a holding company to give the Federal Reserve prior notice of any redemption or repurchase of its own equity securities, if the consideration to be paid, together with the consideration paid for any repurchases or redemptions in the preceding year, is equal to 10% or more of the company’s consolidated net worth. The Federal Reserve may oppose the transaction if it believes that the transaction would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice or would violate any law or regulation. Depending upon the circumstances, the Federal Reserve could take the position that paying a dividend would constitute an unsafe or unsound banking practice.

The Federal Reserve has broad authority to prohibit activities of bank holding companies and their non-banking subsidiaries which represent unsafe and unsound banking practices or which constitute violations of laws or regulations, and can assess civil money penalties for certain activities conducted on a knowing and reckless basis, if those activities caused a substantial loss to a depository institution. The penalties can be as high as $1.0 million for each day the activity continues.

Anti-Tying Restrictions. Bank holding companies and their affiliates are prohibited from tying the provision of certain services, such as extensions of credit, to other services offered by a holding company or its affiliates.

Capital Adequacy Requirements. The Federal Reserve has adopted a system using risk-based capital guidelines to evaluate the capital adequacy of bank holding companies. Under the guidelines, specific categories of assets are assigned different risk weights, based generally on the perceived credit risk of the asset. These risk weights are multiplied by corresponding asset balances to determine a “risk-weighted” asset base. The guidelines require a minimum total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% (of which at least 4.0% is required to consist of Tier 1 capital elements). Total capital is the sum of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital. As of December 31, 2004, the Company’s ratio of Tier 1 capital to total risk-weighted assets was 12.52% and its ratio of total capital to total risk-weighted assets was 13.65%.

In addition to the risk-based capital guidelines, the Federal Reserve uses a leverage ratio as an additional tool to evaluate the capital adequacy of bank holding companies. The leverage ratio is a company’s Tier 1 capital divided by its average total consolidated assets. Certain highly rated bank holding companies may maintain a minimum leverage ratio of 3.0%, but other bank holding companies may be required to maintain a leverage ratio of up to 200 basis points above the regulatory minimum. As of December 31, 2004, the Company’s leverage ratio was 8.73%.

The federal banking agencies’ risk-based and leverage ratios are minimum supervisory ratios generally applicable to banking organizations that meet certain specified criteria, assuming that they have the highest regulatory rating. Banking organizations not meeting these criteria are expected to operate with capital positions well above the minimum ratios. The federal bank regulatory agencies may set capital requirements for a particular banking organization that are higher than the minimum ratios when circumstances warrant. Federal Reserve guidelines also provide that banking organizations experiencing internal growth or making acquisitions will be expected to maintain strong capital positions substantially above the minimum supervisory levels, without significant reliance on intangible assets.

Imposition of Liability for Undercapitalized Subsidiaries. Bank regulators are required to take “prompt corrective action” to resolve problems associated with insured depository institutions whose capital declines below certain levels. In the event an institution becomes “undercapitalized,” it must submit a capital restoration plan. The capital restoration plan will not be accepted by the regulators unless each company having control of the undercapitalized institution guarantees the subsidiary’s compliance with the capital restoration plan up to a certain specified amount. Any such guarantee from a depository institution’s holding company is entitled to a priority of payment in bankruptcy.

The aggregate liability of the holding company of an undercapitalized bank is limited to the lesser of 5% of the institution’s assets at the time it became undercapitalized or the amount necessary to cause the institution to be “adequately capitalized.” The bank regulators have greater power in situations where an institution becomes “significantly” or “critically” undercapitalized or fails to submit a capital restoration plan. For example, a bank holding company controlling such an institution can be required to obtain prior Federal Reserve approval of proposed dividends, or might be required to consent to a consolidation or to divest the troubled institution or other affiliates.

Acquisitions by Bank Holding Companies. The BHC Act requires every bank holding company to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before it may acquire all or substantially all of the assets of any bank, or ownership or control of any voting shares of any bank, if after such acquisition it would own or control, directly or indirectly, more than 5% of the voting shares of such bank. In approving bank acquisitions by bank holding companies, the Federal Reserve is required to consider the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of the bank holding company and the banks concerned, the convenience and needs of the communities to be served, and various competitive factors.

Control Acquisitions. The Change in Bank Control Act prohibits a person or group of persons from acquiring “control” of a bank holding company unless the Federal Reserve has been notified and has not objected to the transaction. Under a rebuttable presumption established by the Federal Reserve, the acquisition of 10% or more of a class of voting stock of a bank holding company with a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, such as the Company, would, under the circumstances set forth in the presumption, constitute acquisition of control of the Company.

In addition, any company is required to obtain the approval of the Federal Reserve under the BHC Act before acquiring 25% (5% in the case of an acquirer that is a bank holding company) or more of the outstanding Common Stock of the Company, or otherwise obtaining control or a “controlling influence” over the Company.

The Bank. The Bank is a Texas-chartered banking association, the deposits of which are insured by the Bank Insurance Fund (“BIF”) of the FDIC. The Bank is not a member of the Federal Reserve System; therefore, the Bank is subject to supervision and regulation by the FDIC and the Texas Department of Banking (“TDB”). Such supervision and regulation subjects the Bank to special restrictions, requirements, potential enforcement actions and periodic examination by the FDIC and the TDB. Because the Federal Reserve regulates the bank holding company parent of the Bank, the Federal Reserve also has supervisory authority, which directly affects the Bank.

Equivalence to National Bank Powers. The Texas Constitution, as amended in 1986, provides that a Texas-chartered bank has the same rights and privileges that are or may be granted to national banks domiciled in Texas. To the extent that the Texas laws and regulations may have allowed state-chartered banks to engage in a broader range of activities than national banks, the FDICIA has operated to limit this authority. FDICIA provides that no state bank or subsidiary thereof may engage as principal in any activity not permitted for national banks, unless the institution complies with applicable capital requirements and the FDIC determines that the activity poses no significant risk to the insurance fund. In general, statutory restrictions on the activities of banks are aimed at protecting the safety and soundness of depository institutions.

Financial Modernization. Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, a national bank may establish a financial subsidiary and engage, subject to limitations on investment, in activities that are financial in nature, other than insurance underwriting as principal, insurance company portfolio investment, real estate development, real estate investment and annuity issuance. To do so, a bank must be well capitalized, well managed and have a CRA rating of satisfactory or better. Subsidiary banks of a bank holding company or national banks with financial subsidiaries must remain well capitalized and well managed in order to continue to engage in activities that are financial in nature without regulatory actions or restrictions, which could include divestiture of the financial subsidiary or subsidiaries. In addition, a bank holding company or a bank may not acquire a company that is engaged in activities that are financial in nature unless each of the subsidiary banks of the bank holding company or the bank has a CRA rating of satisfactory or better.

Although the powers of state-chartered banks with respect to engaging in financial activities are not specifically addressed in the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, state banks, such as the Bank, will have the same if not greater powers as national banks through the parity provision contained in the Texas Constitution.

Branching. Texas law provides that a Texas-chartered bank can establish a branch anywhere in Texas provided that the branch is approved in advance by the TDB. The branch must also be approved by the FDIC, which considers a number of factors, including financial history, capital adequacy, earnings prospects, character of management, needs of the community and consistency with corporate powers.

Restrictions on Transactions With Affiliates and Insiders. Transactions between the Bank and its nonbanking affiliates, including the Company, are subject to Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. In general, Section 23A imposes limits on the amount of such transactions, and also requires certain levels of collateral for loans to affiliated parties. It also limits the amount of advances to third parties, which are collateralized by the securities or obligations of the Company or its subsidiaries.

Affiliate transactions are also subject to Section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act which generally requires that certain transactions between the Bank and its affiliates be on terms substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the Bank, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with or involving other nonaffiliated persons. The Federal Reserve has also issued Regulation W which codifies prior regulations under Section 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and interpretive guidance with respect to affiliate transactions.

The restrictions on loans to directors, executive officers, principal shareholders and their related interests (collectively referred to herein as “insiders”) contained in the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation O apply to all insured institutions and their subsidiaries and holding companies. These restrictions include limits on loans to one borrower and conditions that must be met before such a loan can be made. There is also an aggregate limitation on all loans to insiders and their related interests. These loans cannot exceed the institution’s total unimpaired capital and surplus, and the FDIC may determine that a lesser amount is appropriate. Insiders are subject to enforcement actions for knowingly accepting loans in violation of applicable restrictions.

Restrictions on Distribution of Subsidiary Bank Dividends and Assets. Dividends paid by the Bank have provided a substantial part of the Company’s operating funds and it is anticipated that dividends paid by the Bank to the Company will continue to be the Company’s principal source of operating funds. Capital adequacy requirements serve to limit the amount of dividends that may be paid by the Bank. Under federal law, the Bank cannot pay a dividend if, after paying the dividend, the Bank will be “undercapitalized.” The FDIC may declare a dividend payment to be unsafe and unsound even though the Bank would continue to meet its capital requirements after the dividend.

Because the Company is a legal entity separate and distinct from its subsidiaries, its right to participate in the distribution of assets of any subsidiary upon the subsidiary’s liquidation or reorganization will be subject to the prior claims of the subsidiary’s creditors. In the event of a liquidation or other resolution of an insured depository
institution, the claims of depositors and other general or subordinated creditors are entitled to a priority of payment over the claims of holders of any obligation of the institution to its shareholders, including any depository institution holding company (such as the Company) or any shareholder or creditor thereof.

Examinations. The FDIC periodically examines and evaluates insured banks. Based upon such an evaluation, the FDIC may revalue the assets of the institution and require that it establish specific reserves to compensate for the difference between the FDIC-determined value and the book value of such assets. The TDB also conducts examinations of state banks but may accept the results of a federal examination in lieu of conducting an independent examination.

Audit Reports. Insured institutions with total assets of $500 million or more must submit annual audit reports prepared by independent auditors to federal and state regulators. In some instances, the audit report of the institution’s holding company can be used to satisfy this requirement. Auditors must receive examination reports, supervisory agreements and reports of enforcement actions. In addition, financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management’s certifications concerning responsibility for the financial statements, internal controls and compliance with legal requirements designated by the FDIC, and an attestation by the auditor regarding the statements of management relating to the internal controls must be submitted. For institutions with total assets of more than $3 billion, independent auditors may be required to review quarterly financial statements. FDICIA requires that independent audit committees be formed, consisting of outside directors only. The committees of such institutions must include members with experience in banking or financial management, must have access to outside counsel, and must not include representatives of large customers.

Capital Adequacy Requirements. The FDIC has adopted regulations establishing minimum requirements for the capital adequacy of insured institutions. The FDIC may establish higher minimum requirements if, for example, a bank has previously received special attention or has a high susceptibility to interest rate risk.

The FDIC’s risk-based capital guidelines generally require state banks to have a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to total risk-weighted assets of 4.0% and a ratio of total capital to total risk-weighted assets of 8.0%. The capital categories have the same definitions for the Bank as for the Company. As of December 31, 2004, the Bank’s ratio of Tier 1 capital to total risk-weighted assets was 11.11% and its ratio of total capital to total risk-weighted assets was 12.25%.

The FDIC’s leverage guidelines require state banks to maintain Tier 1 capital of no less than 5.0% of average total assets, except in the case of certain highly rated banks for which the requirement is 3.0% of average total assets. The TDB has issued a policy, which generally requires state chartered banks to maintain a leverage ratio (defined in accordance with federal capital guidelines) of 6.0%. As of December 31, 2004, the Bank’s ratio of Tier 1 capital to average total assets (leverage ratio) was 7.74%.

Corrective Measures for Capital Deficiencies. The federal banking regulators are required to take “prompt corrective action” with respect to capital-deficient institutions. Agency regulations define, for each capital category, the levels at which institutions are “well capitalized,” “adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly under capitalized” and “critically under capitalized.” A “well capitalized” bank has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or higher; a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or higher; a leverage ratio of 5.0% or higher; and is not subject to any written agreement, order or directive requiring it to maintain a specific capital level for any capital measure. An “adequately capitalized” bank has a total risk based capital ratio of 8.0% or higher; a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 4.0% or higher; a leverage ratio of 4.0% or higher (3.0% or higher if the bank was rated a composite 1 in its most recent examination report and is not experiencing significant growth); and does not meet the criteria for a well capitalized bank. A bank is “undercapitalized” if it fails to meet any one of the ratios required to be adequately capitalized.

In addition to requiring undercapitalized institutions to submit a capital restoration plan, agency regulations contain broad restrictions on certain activities of undercapitalized institutions including asset growth, acquisitions, branch establishment, and expansion into new lines of business. With certain exceptions, an insured depository institution is prohibited from making capital distributions, including dividends, and is prohibited from paying management fees to control persons if the institution would be undercapitalized after any such distribution or payment.

As an institution’s capital decreases, the FDIC’s enforcement powers become more severe. A significantly undercapitalized institution is subject to mandated capital raising activities, restrictions on interest rates paid and transactions with affiliates, removal of management, and other restrictions. The FDIC has only very limited discretion in dealing with a critically undercapitalized institution and is virtually required to appoint a receiver or conservator.

Banks with risk-based capital and leverage ratios below the required minimums may also be subject to certain administrative actions, including the termination of deposit insurance upon notice and hearing, or a temporary suspension of insurance without a hearing in the event the institution has no tangible capital.

Management believes that the Company meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject at December 31, 2004. The Bank’s capital ratios exceeded the minimum requirements for “well capitalized” institutions under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action at December 31, 2004. As a result, the Company does not believe that FDICIA’s prompt corrective action regulations will have any material effect on the activities or operations of the Bank. It should be noted, however, that a bank’s capital category is determined solely for the purpose of applying the FDICIA’s “prompt corrective action” regulations and that the capital category may not constitute an accurate representation of the Bank’s overall financial condition or prospects.

Deposit Insurance Assessments. The Bank must pay assessments to the FDIC for federal deposit insurance protection. The FDIC has adopted a risk-based assessment system as required by FDICIA. Under this system, FDIC-insured depository institutions pay insurance premiums at rates based on their risk classification. Institutions assigned to higher-risk classifications (that is, institutions that pose a greater risk of loss to their respective deposit insurance funds) pay assessments at higher rates than institutions that pose a lower risk. An institution’s risk classification is assigned based on its capital levels and the level of supervisory concern the institution poses to the regulators. In addition, the FDIC can impose special assessments in certain instances. The current range of BIF assessments is between 0% and 0.27% of deposits.

The FDIC established a process for raising or lowering all rates for insured institutions semi-annually if conditions warrant a change. Under this new system, the FDIC has the flexibility to adjust the assessment rate schedule twice a year without seeking prior public comment, but only within a range of five cents per $100 above or below the premium schedule adopted. Changes in the rate schedule outside the five-cent range above or below the current schedule can be made by the FDIC only after a full rulemaking with opportunity for public comment.

In addition to BIF assessments, banks insured under the BIF are required to pay a portion of the interest due on bonds that were issued by the Financing Corporation (“FICO”) to help shore up the ailing Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation in 1987. With regard to the assessment for the FICO obligation, for the fourth quarter 2004, the BIF rate was 0.0146% of deposits. The FICO assessment rate is adjusted quarterly.

Enforcement Powers. The FDIC and the other federal banking agencies have broad enforcement powers, including the power to terminate deposit insurance, impose substantial fines and other civil and criminal penalties and appoint a conservator or receiver. Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and supervisory agreements could subject the Company or its banking subsidiaries, as well as officers, directors and other institution-affiliated parties of these organizations, to administrative sanctions and potentially substantial civil money penalties. The appropriate federal banking agency may appoint the FDIC as conservator or receiver for a banking institution (or the FDIC may appoint itself, under certain circumstances) if any one or more of a number of circumstances exist, including, without limitation, the fact that the banking institution is undercapitalized and has no reasonable prospect of becoming adequately capitalized; fails to become adequately capitalized when required to do so; fails to submit a timely and acceptable capital restoration plan; or materially fails to implement an accepted capital restoration plan. The TDB also has broad enforcement powers over the Bank, including the power to impose orders, remove officers and directors, impose fines and appoint supervisors and conservators.

Brokered Deposit Restrictions. Adequately capitalized institutions cannot accept, renew or roll over brokered deposits except with a waiver from the FDIC, and are subject to restrictions on the interest rates that can be paid on such deposits. Undercapitalized institutions may not accept, renew or roll over brokered deposits.

Cross-Guarantee Provisions. The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 (“FIRREA”) contains a “cross-guarantee” provision which generally makes commonly controlled insured depository institutions liable to the FDIC for any losses incurred in connection with the failure of a commonly controlled depository institution.

Community Reinvestment Act (CRA). The CRA and the regulations issued thereunder are intended to encourage banks to help meet the credit needs of their service area, including low and moderate income neighborhoods, consistent with the safe and sound operations of the banks. These regulations also provide for regulatory assessment of a bank’s record in meeting the needs of its service area when considering applications to establish branches, merger applications and applications to acquire the assets and assume the liabilities of another bank. FIRREA requires federal banking agencies to make public a rating of a bank’s performance under the CRA. In the case of a bank holding company, the CRA performance record of the banks involved in the transaction are reviewed in connection with the filing of an application to acquire ownership or control of shares or assets of a bank or to merge with any other bank holding company. An unsatisfactory record can substantially delay or block the transaction.

Consumer Laws and Regulations. In addition to the laws and regulations discussed herein, the Bank is also subject to certain consumer laws and regulations that are designed to protect consumers in transactions with banks. While the list set forth herein is not exhaustive, these laws and regulations include the Truth in Lending Act, the Truth in Savings Act, the Electronic Funds Transfer Act, the Expedited Funds Availability Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, and the Fair Housing Act, among others. These laws and regulations mandate certain disclosure requirements and regulate the manner in which financial institutions must deal with customers when taking deposits or making loans to such customers. The Bank must comply with the applicable provisions of these consumer protection laws and regulations as part of their ongoing customer relations.

Instability of Regulatory Structure. Various legislation, such as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which expanded the powers of banking institutions and bank holding companies, and proposals to overhaul the bank regulatory system and limit the investments that a depository institution may make with insured funds, is from time to time introduced in Congress. Such legislation may change banking statutes and the operating environment of the Company and the Bank in substantial and unpredictable ways. The Company cannot determine the ultimate effect that the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act will have or the effect that potential legislation, if enacted, or implementing regulations with respect thereto, would have, upon the financial condition or results of operations of the Company or its subsidiaries.

Expanding Enforcement Authority. One of the major additional burdens imposed on the banking industry by FDICIA is the increased ability of banking regulators to monitor the activities of banks and their holding companies. In addition, the Federal Reserve and FDIC possess extensive authority to police unsafe or unsound practices and violations of applicable laws and regulations by depository institutions and their holding companies. For example, the FDIC may terminate the deposit insurance of any institution, which it determines has engaged in an unsafe or unsound practice. The agencies can also assess civil money penalties, issue cease and desist or removal orders, seek injunctions, and publicly disclose such actions. FDICIA, FIRREA and other laws have expanded the agencies’ authority in recent years, and the agencies have not yet fully tested the limits of their powers.

Effect on Economic Environment. The policies of regulatory authorities, including the monetary policy of the Federal Reserve, have a significant effect on the operating results of bank holding companies and their subsidiaries. Among the means available to the Federal Reserve to affect the money supply are open market operations in U.S. Government securities, changes in the discount rate on member bank borrowings, and changes in reserve requirements against member bank deposits. These means are used in varying combinations to influence overall growth and distribution of bank loans, investments and deposits, and their use may affect interest rates charged on loans or paid for deposits.

Federal Reserve monetary policies have materially affected the operating results of commercial banks in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the future. The nature of future monetary policies and the effect of such policies on the business and earnings of the Company and the Bank cannot be predicted.

Item 2. Properties

The Company conducts business at twelve banking locations, with two located in Mount Pleasant, two located in Texarkana, seven located in the Northeast Texas communities of Bogata, Commerce, Mount Vernon, Paris, Pittsburg, Sulphur Springs, Talco and one located in the West Texas community of Fort Stockton. The Company’s headquarters are located at 100 West Arkansas in Mount Pleasant in a two-story office building. The Company owns all of its locations. The following table sets forth specific information on each of the Company’s locations:

Location	Address	Deposits at December 31, 2004

		(Dollars in thousands)
Bogata	110 Halesboro Street, Bogata, Texas 75417	$	22,185
Commerce	1108 Park Street, Commerce, Texas 75429		33,416
Fort Stockton ⁽¹⁾	#1 Spring Drive, Fort Stockton, Texas 79735		691
Mount Pleasant-Downtown	100 West Arkansas, Mount Pleasant, Texas 75455		168,625
Mount Pleasant-South ⁽²⁾	2317 South Jefferson, Mount Pleasant, Texas 75455
Mount Vernon ⁽³⁾	304 South Highway 37, Mount Vernon, Texas 75457		1,354
Paris	3250 Lamar Avenue, Paris, Texas 75460		82,844
Pittsburg	116 South Greer Blvd., Pittsburg, Texas 75686		20,562
Sulphur Springs	919 Gilmer Street, Sulphur Springs, Texas 75482		62,157
Talco	104 Broad Street, Talco, Texas 75487		13,807
Texarkana	2202 St. Michael Drive, Texarkana, Texas 75503		27,283
Texarkana-West ⁽⁴⁾	5800 West 7th Street, Texarkana, Texas 75503		819

⁽¹⁾ Location offers loans and time deposits only.

⁽²⁾ Combined with Mt. Pleasant Downtown location deposits.

⁽³⁾ Opened in November 2004.

⁽⁴⁾ Opened in August 2004.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

The Company faces ordinary routine litigation arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, liabilities (if any) arising from such claims will not have a material adverse effect upon the business, results of operations or financial condition of the Company.

In November 1998, Guaranty Leasing was informed by the Internal Revenue Service (the “Service”) that it has taken the position that certain losses taken by the “1992 Partnership” during 1994, 1995 and 1996 of $302,000, $410,000 and $447,000, respectively, would be disallowed. In October 2001, Guaranty Leasing was informed by the Service that it has taken the position that certain losses taken by that Partnership during 1997 of $487,000 would also be disallowed. In September 2002, the Company received from the Service a Notice of Final Partnership Administrative Adjustment disallowing these deductions. Based upon the advice of counsel, the Company believes that it has correctly reported these transactions for tax purposes and that it has obtained appropriate legal, accounting and appraisal opinions and authority to support its positions. The Company recorded and expensed the tax affect of the disallowed deductions in 2002.

In addition to the ongoing litigation regarding the Partnerships, the Service is currently in the process of examining the tax deductions taken for the “1995 Partnership”. No determination has been made regarding the disallowance of similar deductions taken by this Partnership. Should the Service ultimately disallow the related tax deductions taken during the remaining years of the “1992 Partnership” as well as the other two Partnerships, the Company will be required to recognize an additional maximum tax liability of approximately $3.9 million plus possible penalty and interest. The Company is actively contesting the position of the Service in connection with this matter, and has taken and will continue to take, appropriate steps necessary to protect its legal position. Any final determination with respect to the Partnerships will be binding on the Company.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2004.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities

The Common Stock began trading on May 21, 1998 and is listed on the Nasdaq National Market System (“Nasdaq NMS”) under the symbol “GNTY”. Prior to that date, the Company’s Common Stock was privately held and not listed on any public exchange or actively traded. The Company had a total of 2,912,677 shares outstanding at December 31, 2004. As of December 31, 2004, there were 349 registered shareholders of record. The number of beneficial shareholders is unknown to the Company at this time.

The following table presents the high and low Common Stock prices reported on the Nasdaq NMS by quarter during the two years ended December 31, 2004:

	2004				2003

	High		Low		High		Low

Fourth quarter	$	22.83	$	20.44	$	22.00	$	17.78
Third quarter		24.00		17.05		18.15		16.40
Second quarter		20.65		19.00		16.59		14.90
First quarter		22.10		20.00		16.40		15.64

Holders of Common Stock are entitled to receive dividends when, as and if declared by the Company’s Board of Directors out of funds legally available therefore. While the Company has declared dividends on its Common Stock since 1980, and paid semi-annual dividends aggregating $0.40 per share per annum in 2004, there is no assurance that the Company will continue to pay dividends in the future.

The principal source of cash revenues to the Company is dividends paid by the Bank with respect to the Bank’s capital stock. There are certain restrictions on the payment of such dividends imposed by federal and state banking laws, regulations and authorities. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Supervision and Regulation – “The Bank”.

The Company’s cash dividends paid per share by quarter for the Company’s last two fiscal years were as follows:

	2004		2003

Fourth quarter	$	0.20	$	0.20
Third quarter		—		—
Second quarter		0.20		0.17
First quarter		—		—

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The Company currently has stock options outstanding. The options were granted under the Company’s 1998 Stock Incentive Plan which was approved by the Company’s shareholders. The following table provides information as of December 31, 2004 regarding the Company’s equity compensation plans under which the Company’s equity securities are authorized for issuance:

	EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

	(a)		(b)		(c)
Plan category		Number of securities be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options	Number of securities to remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders		141,300	$	11.58		854,500
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		—		—		—

Total		141,300	$	11.58		854,500

The following table provides information about Company purchases of equity securities that are registered by the Company pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act during the year ended December 31, 2004:

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1)		Average Price Paid per Share		Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs

July 1, 2004 - July 31, 2004		5,000	$	19.75		20,500
August 1, 2004 - August 31, 2004		6,451		19.50		14,049

Total		11,451	$	19.61

(1) Under a stock repurchase program approved by the Company’s Board of Directors on August 20, 2002, publicly announced on August 27, 2002 and implemented effective November 15, 2002, the Company was authorized to repurchase up to 100,000 shares of its Common Stock. The repurchase program does not have an expiration date.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

Selected Consolidated Financial Data Of The Company

The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and the notes thereto, appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and the information contained in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”.

The following table presents selected historical consolidated financial data as of and for the five years ended December 31, 2004 and is derived from the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been audited by an independent registered public accounting firm.

	As of and for the Years Ended December 31

	2004			2003			2002			2001			2000

	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Income Statement Data:
Interest income	$	27,029		$	27,564		$	28,955		$	29,861		$	29,017
Interest expense		9,137			10,242			12,272			16,363			16,742

Net interest income		17,892			17,322			16,683			13,498			12,275
Provision for loan losses		930			1,075			1,260			1,385			595

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		16,962			16,247			15,423			12,113			11,680
Noninterest income		4,756			4,937			5,056			6,201			3,723
Noninterest expense		16,483			15,837			14,692			13,519			12,140

Earnings before taxes		5,235			5,347			5,787			4,795			3,263
Provision for income tax expense		1,575			1,503			1,410			1,505			755

Net earnings	$	3,660		$	3,844		$	4,377		$	3,290		$	2,508

Common Share Data:
Net earnings (basic) ⁽¹⁾	$	1.25		$	1.32		$	1.46		$	1.09		$	0.80
Net earnings (diluted) ⁽¹⁾		1.24			1.30			1.45			1.09			0.80
Book value		13.26			12.47			11.81			10.59			9.67
Tangible book value		12.46			11.67			11.01			9.82			8.85
Cash dividends		0.40			0.37			0.32			0.28			0.25
Dividend payout ratio		31.88	%		28.12	%		21.73	%		25.56	%		30.70	%
Weighted average common shares outstanding-basic (in thousands)		2,918			2,923			2,991			3,016			3,126
Weighted average common shares outstanding-diluted (in thousands)		2,963			2,953			3,013			3,027			3,133
Period end shares outstanding (in thousands)		2,913			2,922			2,932			3,004			3,044
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
Total assets	$	541,966		$	517,078		$	517,968		$	460,509		$	411,031
Securities		103,751			99,614			106,992			81,715			81,620
Loans held for sale		1,749			1,244			5,727			1,634			172
Loans		375,585			364,270			359,888			329,621			287,163
Allowance for loan losses		4,154			3,906			3,692			3,346			2,578
Total deposits		433,743			407,847			424,950			383,279			358,265
Total shareholders’ equity		38,624			36,448			34,644			31,827			29,425

(Table continues on next page.)

	As of and for the Years Ended December 31

	2004			2003			2002			2001			2000

	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data )
Average Balance Sheet Data:
Total assets	$	527,025		$	524,675		$	490,620		$	432,200		$	394,496
Securities		97,549			109,325			91,710			74,826			84,933
Loans ⁽²⁾		371,586			359,829			342,823			302,656			267,996
Allowance for loan losses		4,091			3,767			3,485			2,735			2,519
Total deposits		420,592			423,283			403,125			374,566			345,342
Total shareholders’ equity		37,687			35,496			33,934			30,629			28,266
Performance Ratios:
Return on average assets		0.69	%		0.73	%		0.89	%		0.76	%		0.64	%
Return on average common equity		9.71			10.83			12.90			10.74			8.87
Net interest margin		3.71			3.63			3.73			3.46			3.44
Efficiency ratio ⁽³⁾		73.17			71.75			68.79			70.10			75.72
Asset Quality Ratios⁽⁴⁾:
Nonperforming assets to total loans and other real estate		1.13	%		0.90	%		1.18	%		1.87	%		1.73	%
Net loan charge-offs to average loans		0.18			0.24			0.27			0.20			0.19
Allowance for loan losses to total loans		1.10			1.07			1.01			1.01			0.90
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans ⁽⁵⁾		116.16			152.52			114.87			59.23			54.83
Capital Ratios ⁽⁴⁾:
Leverage ratio		8.73	%		8.32	%		8.62	%		8.44	%		8.60	%
Average shareholders’ equity to average total assets		7.15			6.77			6.92			7.09			7.17
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio		12.52			12.10			12.06			11.52			11.79
Total risk-based capital ratio		13.65			13.18			13.12			12.58			12.69


⁽¹⁾	Net earnings per share are based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
⁽²⁾	Includes loans held for sale.
⁽³⁾	Calculated by dividing total noninterest expenses by net interest income plus noninterest income, excluding securities losses or gains. Taxes are not part of this calculation.
⁽⁴⁾	At period end, except net loan charge-offs to average loans, and average shareholders’ equity to average total assets which is for periods ended at such date.
⁽⁵⁾	Nonperforming loans consist of nonaccrual loans, loans contractually past due 90 days or more and restructured loans.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

SPECIAL CAUTIONARY NOTICE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

Statements and financial discussion and analysis contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements which describe the Company’s future plans, strategies and expectations, are based on assumptions and involve a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company’s control. The important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements include, without limitation:

	•	changes in interest rates and market prices, which could reduce the Company’s net interest margins, asset valuations and expense expectations;

	•	changes in the levels of loan prepayments and the resulting effects on the value of the Company’s loan portfolio;

	•	changes in local economic and business conditions which adversely affect the Company’s customers and their ability to transact profitable business with the Company, including the ability of its borrowers to repay their loans according to their terms or a change in the value of the related collateral;

	•	increased competition for deposits and loans adversely affecting rates and terms;

	•	the timing, impact and other uncertainties of the Company’s potential future acquisitions, including the Company’s ability to identify suitable future acquisition candidates, the success or failure in the integration of their operations, and the Company’s ability to enter new markets successfully and capitalize on growth opportunities;

	•	increased credit risk in the Company’s assets and increased operating risk caused by a material change in commercial, consumer and/or real estate loans as a percentage of the total loan portfolio;

	•	the failure of assumptions underlying the establishment of and provisions made to the allowance for loan losses;

	•	changes in the availability of funds resulting in increased costs or reduced liquidity;

	•	changes in the Company’s ability to pay dividends on its Common Stock;

	•	increased asset levels and changes in the composition of assets and the resulting impact on the Company’s capital levels and regulatory capital ratios;

	•	the Company’s ability to acquire, operate and maintain cost effective and efficient systems without incurring unexpectedly difficult or expensive but necessary technological changes;

	•	the loss of senior management or operating personnel and the potential inability to hire qualified personnel at reasonable compensation levels;

	•	the effects of the Internal Revenue Service’s examination regarding the Company’s leveraged leasing transactions;

	•	changes in economic and business conditions which would adversely affect the value of the Aircraft Finance Trust (“AFT”), and cause the Company to not fully realize its current investment in AFT; and,

	•	changes in status of government regulations or their interpretations applicable to bank holding companies and the Company’s present and future banking and other subsidiaries, including changes in tax requirements and tax rates.

All written or oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Company are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies And Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. While the Company bases its estimates on historical experience, current information and other factors deemed to be relevant, actual results could differ from those estimates.

The Company considers accounting estimates to be critical to its reported financial results if (i) the accounting estimate requires management to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain and (ii) different estimates that management reasonably could have used for the accounting estimate in the current period, or changes in the accounting estimate that are reasonably likely to occur from period to period, would have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. Accounting policies related to allowance for loan losses and loss contingencies are considered to be critical as these policies involve considerable subjective judgment and estimation by management. Critical accounting policies, and the Company’s procedures related to these policies, are described in detail below.

Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is a reserve established through charges to earnings in the form of a provision for loan losses. Management has established an allowance for loan losses, which it believes is adequate to absorb estimated losses in the Company’s loan portfolio. Based on an evaluation of the loan portfolio, management presents a quarterly review of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses to the Company’s Board of Directors. In making its evaluation, management considers the diversification by industry of the Company’s commercial loan portfolio, the effect of changes in the local real estate market on collateral values, the results of recent regulatory examinations, the effects on the loan portfolio of current economic indicators and their probable impact on borrowers, the amount of charge-offs for the period, the amount of nonperforming loans and related collateral security, the results of management’s internal loan review, its own peer group analysis, and the evaluation of its loan portfolio through a semi-annual external loan review conducted by IBS. Charge-offs occur when loans are deemed to be uncollectible. See additional discussion under the sections captioned, “Allowance for Loan Losses” and “Provision for Loan Losses,” included elsewhere in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Loss Contingencies. There are times when non-recurring events occur that require management to consider whether an accrual for a loss contingency is appropriate. Accruals for such loss contingencies typically relate to legal proceedings and other claims and are recorded when management believes the likelihood of an adverse outcome is probable and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable. Contingent liabilities are often resolved over long time periods. Estimating probable losses requires analysis of multiple forecasts that often depend on judgments about potential actions by third parties. While there can be no assurance, the Company currently believes the outcome of current outstanding legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations. The outcomes are inherently uncertain, and it is possible that some of these matters may be resolved materially adversely to the Company. The adverse resolution of any one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

Overview

The Company’s results of operations are dependent primarily on net interest income, which is the difference between the income earned on its loan, securities and investment portfolios and its cost of funds, consisting of the interest paid on deposits and borrowings. Results of operations are increased by the Company’s noninterest income and decreased by the provision for loan losses and noninterest expenses. General economic and competitive conditions, particularly changes in interest rates, prepayment rates of mortgage-backed securities and loans, repricings of loan relationships, government policies and actions of regulatory authorities, also significantly affect the Company’s results of operations. Future changes in applicable law, regulations or government policies may also have a material impact on the Company.

Net earnings were $3.7 million, $3.8 million and $4.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively, and diluted net earnings per share were $1.24, $1.30, and $1.45 for these same periods. The decrease in earnings from 2003 to 2004 resulted primarily from an increase in noninterest expense and a decrease in noninterest income, partially offset by an increase in net interest income, caused by a growth in interest-earnings assets and a lower cost of funds. Average interest-earning assets increased to $481.7 million from $476.9 million, or 1.0% in 2004, while the cost of funds decreased from 2.46% in 2003 to 2.24% in 2004. The resulting net interest margin increased from 3.63% in 2003 to 3.71% in 2004, an increase of 8 basis points or 2.2%. Noninterest income decreased $181,000, or 3.7% primarily from fewer gains on the sale of securities and a decrease in the sale of mortgage loans into the secondary market. Noninterest expense increased $646,000, or 4.1% during 2004 compared to 2003 resulting primarily from an increase in occupancy expenses and advertising. The Company also incurred additional expenses to open the new Texarkana location in the third quarter of 2004, expenses to open the new Mount Vernon location in the fourth quarter of 2004 and expenses related to the closing of the Deport location in the third quarter of 2004. The decrease in earnings from 2002 to 2003 resulted primarily from an increase in noninterest expense and a decrease in noninterest income, partially offset by an increase in net interest income. The Company posted returns on average assets of 0.69%, 0.73% and 0.89% and returns on average common equity of 9.71%, 10.83% and 12.90% in 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.

Total assets at December 31, 2004 and 2003 were $542.0 million and $517.1 million, respectively. Total deposits at December 31, 2004 and 2003 were $433.7 million and $407.8 million, respectively, an increase of $25.9 million, or 6.3% in 2004. The increase in deposits was primarily attributable to an increase in NOW accounts of $5.7 million, an increase in savings and money market accounts of $8.7 million and an increase in noninterest-bearing accounts of $10.1 million. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, securities totaled $103.8 million and $99.6 million, respectively. The increase in securities during 2004 was primarily due to an increase of $9.4 million in state and municipal securities, partially offset by an increase in normal pay-downs in the secondary market. Common shareholders’ equity was $38.6 million and $36.4 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in common shareholder’s equity for the year ended December 31, 2004 reflects earnings retention, partially offset by the purchase of treasury stock and payment of dividends.

Results of Operations

Net Interest Income

Net interest income represents the amount by which interest income on interest-earning assets, which include securities, loans, and federal funds sold, exceeds interest expense incurred on interest-bearing liabilities, which include deposits and other borrowed funds. Net interest income is the principal source of the Company’s earnings. Interest rate fluctuations, as well as changes in the amount and type of earning assets and liabilities, combine to affect net interest income.

2004 versus 2003 Net interest income, before the provision for loan losses, increased from $17.3 million in 2003 to $17.9 million in 2004, an increase of $570,000, or 3.3%. This resulted in net interest margins of 3.71% and 3.63% and net interest spreads of 3.37% and 3.32% for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

The increase in net interest income for 2004 was driven by an increase in average loans of $11.8 million, or 3.3% and a decrease in average time deposits of $14.1 million, or 6.1%. The impact of the increase in average loans was offset by the decrease in the yield on average interest-earning assets from 5.78% in 2003 to 5.61% in 2004. The yield on average interest-bearing liabilities also decreased from 2.46% in 2003 to 2.24% in 2004.

2003 versus 2002 Net interest income, before the provision for loan losses, increased from $16.7 million in 2002 to $17.3 million in 2003, an increase of $639,000, or 3.8% primarily due to a decrease in interest expense of $2.0 million, or 16.5%, partially offset by a decrease in interest income of $1.4 million, or 4.8%. This resulted in net interest margins of 3.63% and 3.73% and net interest spreads of 3.32% and 3.31% for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

The increase in net interest income for 2003 was primarily due to the decrease in cost of interest-bearing liabilities from 3.16% in 2002 to 2.46% in 2003. While the Company had an increase in average loans of $17.0 million, or 4.96% and average securities of $17.6 million, or 19.21%, the impact of these increases were partially offset by lower yield on interest-earning assets which decreased from 6.47% in 2002 to 5.78% in 2003. The lower yields and lower cost of funds resulted from a decrease in the prime rate during 2002 from 4.75% to 4.50% and a further reduction in 2003 from 4.50% to 4.00%.

The following table presents for the periods indicated an analysis of net interest income by each major category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the average amounts outstanding and the interest earned or paid on such amounts. The table also sets forth the average rate earned on total interest-earning assets, the average rate paid on total interest-bearing liabilities and the net interest margin on average total interest-earning assets for the same periods. No tax equivalent adjustments were made and all average balances are daily average balances. Nonaccruing loans have been included in the table as loans carrying a zero yield.

	Years Ended December 31,

	2004								2003								2002

	Average Outstanding Balance			Interest Earned/ Paid		Average Yield/ Rate			Average Outstanding Balance			Interest Earned/ Paid		Average Yield/ Rate			Average Outstanding Balance			Interest Earned/ Paid		Average Yield/ Rate

	(Dollars in thousands)
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Loans	$	371,586		$	22,990		6.19	%	$	359,829		$	23,473		6.52	%	$	342,823		$	24,119		7.04	%
Securities		97,549			3,769		3.86			109,325			3,977		3.64			91,710			4,629		5.05
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits		12,557			270		2.15			7,722			114		1.48			12,821			207		1.61

Total interest-earning assets		481,692			27,029		5.61	%		476,876			27,564		5.78	%		447,354			28,955		6.47	%

Less allowance for loan losses		(4,091	)							(3,767	)							(3,485	)

Total interest-earning assets, net of allowance		477,601								473,109								443,869
Non-earning assets:
Cash and due from banks		18,654								19,440								14,640
Premises and equipment		13,378								13,383								13,442
Interest receivable and other assets		16,576								17,462								17,437
Other real estate owned		816								1,281								1,232

Total assets	$	527,025							$	524,675							$	490,620

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
NOW, savings, and money market accounts	$	124,917		$	1,210		0.97	%	$	121,439		$	941		0.77	%	$	108,664		$	1,507		1.39	%
Time deposits		218,837			4,862		2.22			232,976			6,299		2.70			231,196			8,330		3.60

Total interest-bearing deposits		343,754			6,072		1.77			354,415			7,240		2.04			339,860			9,837		2.89
FHLB, federal funds purchased, and other liabilities		53,720			2,061		3.84			51,377			2,001		3.89			40,827			1,639		4.02
Junior subordinated debentures		10,258			1,004		9.79			—			—		—			—			—		—
Long-term debt		—			—		—			10,000			1,001		10.01			7,750			796		10.27

Total interest-bearing liabilities		407,732			9,137		2.24	%		415,792			10,242		2.46	%		388,437			12,272		3.16	%

Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits		76,838								68,868								63,265
Accrued interest, taxes and other liabilities		4,768								4,519								4,984

Total liabilities		489,338								489,179								456,686
Shareholders’ equity		37,687								35,496								33,934

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	527,025							$	524,675							$	490,620

Net interest income				$	17,892							$	17,322							$	16,683

Net interest spread							3.37	%							3.32	%							3.31	%
Net interest margin							3.71	%							3.63	%							3.73	%

The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense for the major components of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and distinguishes between the changes in interest income and interest expense attributable to changes in average outstanding balances and changes in interest rates. For purposes of this table, changes attributable to both rate and volume, which can be segregated, have been allocated proportionately to changes due to rate and changes due to volume.

	Years Ended December 31,

	2004 vs. 2003									2003 vs. 2002

		Increase (Decrease) Due To								Increase (Decrease) Due To

	Volume			Rate			Total			Volume			Rate			Total

	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans	$	767		$	(1,250	)	$	(483	)	$	1,197		$	(1,843	)	$	(646	)
Securities		(429	)		221			(208	)		890			(1,542	)		(652	)
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits		72			84			156			(82	)		(11	)		(93	)

Total increase (decrease) in interest income		410			(945	)		(535	)		2,005			(3,396	)		(1,391	)

Interest-bearing liabilities:
NOW, savings and money market accounts		27			242			269			178			(744	)		(566	)
Time deposits		(382	)		(1,055	)		(1,437	)		64			(2,095	)		(2,031	)
FHLB advances and federal funds purchased		91			(31	)		60			424			(62	)		362
Junior subordinated debentures		—			3			3			—			—			—
Long-term debt		—			—			—			231			(26	)		205

Total (decrease) increase in interest expense		(264	)		(841	)		(1,105	)		897			(2,927	)		(2,030	)

Increase (decrease) in net interest income	$	674		$	(104	)	$	570		$	1,108		$	(469	)	$	639

Provision for Loan Losses

The Company’s provision for loan losses is established through charges to operating income in the form of the provision in order to bring the total allowance for loan losses to a level deemed appropriate by management of the Company based on such factors as historical loan loss experience, the volume and type of lending conducted by the Company, the amount of nonperforming assets, regulatory policies, generally accepted accounting principles, general economic conditions, and other factors related to the collectability of loans in the Company’s portfolio as discussed under “Allowance for Loan Losses”. In the past two years, the Company has made significant enhancements to the allowance for loan loss methodology in an effort to better quantify the risk associated with these internal and external factors.

The Company’s provision for loan losses for 2004 was $930,000 compared with $1.1 million for 2003. The decrease in the provision was due primarily to a decrease in net charge-offs of $179,000, or 20.8%. Average loans outstanding increased from $359.8 million for 2003 to $371.6 million for 2004, an increase of $11.8 million, or 3.3%. Total classified loans increased from $9.0 million at December 31, 2003 to $10.9 million at December 31, 2004, an increase of $1.9 million, or 21.1%. Management believes the Company has maintained sound asset quality as net charge-offs remain at manageable levels totaling $682,000, or 0.18% of average loans in 2004 compared with $861,000, or 0.24% of average loans in 2003. The Company’s provision for loan losses decreased from $1.3 million in 2002 to $1.1 million in 2003 primarily due to a decrease in nonperforming assets.

Noninterest Income

The Company’s primary sources of recurring noninterest income are service charges on deposit accounts, fee income and other noninterest income. The Company also has nonrecurring sources of noninterest income derived from net gains on the sale of securities, net gains on the sale of mortgage loans and net gains on the sale of assets.

Noninterest income for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $4.8 million, a decrease of $181,000 or 3.7% compared with $4.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 and a decrease in 2003 of $119,000 or 2.4%, compared with $5.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. The 2004 decrease is primarily due to the decrease in the sale of mortgage loans into the secondary market. The net gain on sale of mortgage loans into the secondary market generated noninterest income of $331,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared with $586,000 in 2003, a decrease of $255,000 or 56.5%. Net realized gain on sale of securities decreased to $120,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared with $188,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003. These decreases were partially offset by increases in service charges and fee income of $167,000, or 5.8% and $49,000, or 5.3%, respectively, during the same period.

The noninterest income for 2003 decreased compared to 2002 primarily due to a decrease in securities gains of $192,000, an impairment charge of $113,000 and a loss associated with the AFT lease transaction, partially offset by an increase in net gain on sale of loans due to more consumer refinancing into the secondary market.

During 2000, Guaranty Leasing acquired a 2.5% ownership interest in AFT for approximately $2.8 million. The AFT ownership interest is classified as an Other Asset on the Company’s balance sheet. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the book value of the AFT ownership was $1.3 million and $1.4 million, respectively. Prior to 2004, on belief that the Company’s investment in AFT was impaired by declines in air travel, the uncertainly surrounding the airline industry, the limited marketability of the AFT investment, and general economic conditions, impairment charges of approximately $1.6 million were recorded and the carrying amount of the investment was reduced to $1.4 million. During 2004, an impairment charge of $120,000 was recorded.

The following table presents for the periods indicated the major categories of noninterest income:

	Years Ended December 31,

	2004			2003			2002

	(Dollars in thousands)
Service charges on deposit accounts	$	3,036		$	2,869		$	2,957
Gain on sale of securities, net		120			188			380
Fee income		974			925			863
Fiduciary income		252			178			163
Earnings from key-man life insurance		203			251			236
Gain on sale of loans, net		331			586			272
(Loss) gain on sale of assets, net		(143	)		—			97
Gain on sale of ORE, net		21			32			12
(Loss) from investment in AFT		—			(60	)		—
Impairment of investment in AFT		(120	)		(113	)		—
Other noninterest income		82			81			76

Total noninterest income	$	4,756		$	4,937		$	5,056

Noninterest Expense

For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, noninterest expense totaled $16.5 million, $15.8 million and $14.7 million, respectively. The $646,000, or 4.1% increase in 2004 compared with 2003 was primarily the result of an increase in occupancy expenses and advertising. Occupancy expenses increased $241,000, or 11.9% over the same period in 2003 primarily due to the opening of the new bank location in Texarkana in July of 2004,

the opening of the new bank location in Mount Vernon in October of 2004 and additional Company related depreciation expense. An emphasis on advertising campaigns for each of the two new locations and for certificate of deposit specials, caused advertising expense to increase by $152,000, or 53.5% for the year ended December 31, 2004. Employee compensation and benefits expense decreased $45,000, or 0.5% for the year ended December 31, 2004. The decrease was due primarily to a lower bonus paid to officers and employees and a lower expense related to employee benefits such as health insurance and 401(k) contributions for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to the year ended December 31, 2003.

The increase in total noninterest expense for 2003 compared with 2002 of $1.1 million, or 7.8%, was primarily the result of increases in employee compensation and benefits. Employee compensation and benefits increased from $8.7 million in 2002 to $9.4 million in 2003, an increase of $660,000, or 7.6%. This increase was due to an increase in full-time equivalent employees from 212 at December 31, 2002 to 226 at December 31, 2003, an increase in normal salary adjustments, increased employee benefits and payroll taxes.

The Company’s efficiency ratio was 73.17% in 2004, 71.75% in 2003, and 68.79% in 2002. The efficiency ratio is a supplemental financial measure utilized in management’s internal evaluation of the Company’s performance and is not defined under generally accepted accounting principles. The efficiency ratio is calculated by dividing total noninterest expense, excluding securities losses, by net interest income plus noninterest income, excluding securities gains. Taxes are not part of this calculation. An increase in the efficiency ratio indicates that more resources are being utilized to generate the same volume of income, while a decrease would indicate a more efficient allocation of resources.

The following table presents for the periods indicated the major categories of noninterest expense:

	Years Ended December 31,

	2004		2003		2002

	(Dollars in thousands)
Employee compensation and benefits	$	9,326	$	9,371	$	8,711
Non-staff expenses:
Occupancy expenses		2,260		2,019		1,992
Legal and professional fees		1,156		1,168		933
Director and committee fees		507		560		534
Advertising		436		284		310
ATM and debit card expense		437		363		317
Office and computer supplies		299		301		265
Postage		198		211		187
Phone expense		267		252		194
Other		1,597		1,308		1,249

Total non-staff expenses		7,157		6,466		5,981

Total noninterest expense	$	16,483	$	15,837	$	14,692

Income Taxes

Federal income tax is reported as income tax expense and is influenced by the amount of taxable income, the amount of tax-exempt income, the amount of non-deductible interest expense and the amount of other non-deductible expense. The Company did not utilize tax benefits on leveraged lease transactions in 2003 and 2004. The Company utilized tax benefits on leveraged lease transactions in the amount of $960,000 for 2002. The effective tax rates for 2004, 2003 and 2002 were 30.08%, 28.11% and 24.37%, respectively. Income taxes for financial purposes in the consolidated statements of earnings differ from the amount computed by applying the statutory income tax rate of 35% to earnings before income taxes. The difference in the statutory rate compared with the Company’s effective rate is primarily due to tax-exempt income in 2004, 2003 and 2002. The leverage lease transaction had an additional impact in 2002.

Additionally, the State of Texas imposes a franchise tax. Taxable income for the income tax component of the Texas franchise tax is the federal pre-tax income, plus certain officers’ salaries, less interest income from federal securities. Total franchise tax expense was $37,000 in 2004, $38,000 in 2003 and $41,000 in 2002. Such expense was included as a part of other noninterest expense.

Impact of Inflation

The effects of inflation on the local economy and on the Company’s operating results have been relatively modest for the past several years. Since substantially all of the Company’s assets and liabilities are monetary in nature, such as cash, securities, loans and deposits, their values are less sensitive to the effects of inflation than to changing interest rates, which do not necessarily change in accordance with inflation rates. The Company tries to control the impact of interest rate fluctuations by managing the relationship between its interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities. See “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” below.

Financial Condition

Loan Portfolio (including loans held for sale)

The Company provides a broad range of commercial, real estate and consumer loan products to small and medium-sized businesses and individuals in its market areas. The Company aggressively pursues qualified lending customers in both the commercial and consumer sectors, providing customers with direct access to lending personnel and prompt, professional service. The 87.0% gross loan to deposit ratio as of December 31, 2004, reflects the Company’s commitment as an active lender in the local communities it serves. Total loans increased by $11.8 million, or 3.2% to $377.3 million at December 31, 2004 from $365.5 million at December 31, 2003. Total loans were $365.5 million and $365.6 million at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, reflecting little change. The 2004 growth in loans is reflective of a stable local economy, an aggressive advertising campaign, the Company’s pro-lending reputation and the ability to obtain new loan customers from the new companies and individuals entering the Company’s market areas.

The following table summarizes the loan portfolio (including loans held for sale) of the Company by type of loan as of the dates indicated:

	December 31,

	2004					2003					2002					2001					2000

	Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent

	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial	$	61,602		16.33	%	$	55,285		15.13	%	$	58,661		16.05	%	$	66,641		20.12	%	$	66,616		23.18	%
Agriculture		10,963		2.91			10,173		2.78			9,989		2.73			8,589		2.59			8,318		2.89
Real estate:
Construction and land development		31,917		8.46			22,020		6.02			14,017		3.83			9,492		2.87			7,316		2.55
1-4 family residential		145,886		38.66			136,717		37.40			139,156		38.06			124,480		37.58			102,442		35.65
Loans held for sale		1,749		0.46			1,244		0.34			5,727		1.57			1,634		0.49			172		0.06
Farmland		16,178		4.29			20,267		5.54			14,765		4.04			9,794		2.96			7,716		2.69
Commercial		75,183		19.92			79,953		21.88			81,649		22.33			68,165		20.58			61,224		21.31
Multi-family residential		5,052		1.34			9,291		2.55			9,289		2.54			9,333		2.81			4,946		1.72
Consumer, net of unearned discounts		28,804		7.63			30,564		8.36			32,362		8.85			33,126		10.00			28,585		9.95

Total loans	$	377,334		100.00	%	$	365,514		100.00	%	$	365,615		100.00	%	$	331,254		100.00	%	$	287,335		100.00	%

The primary lending focus of the Company is on loans to small and medium-sized businesses and one-to- four family residential mortgage loans. The Company’s commercial lending products include business loans, commercial real estate loans, equipment loans, working capital loans, term loans, revolving lines of credit and letters of credit. Most commercial loans are collateralized and on payment programs. The purpose of a particular loan generally determines its structure. In almost all cases, the Company requires personal guarantees on commercial loans to help assure repayment. The following is a discussion of each of the Company’s major types of lending.

Commercial

The Company’s commercial loans are primarily made within its market area and are underwritten on the basis of the borrower’s ability to service such debt from income. As a general practice, the Company takes as collateral a lien on any available real estate, equipment, or other assets owned by the borrower and obtains a personal guaranty of the borrower. In general, commercial loans involve more credit risk than residential mortgage loans and commercial mortgage loans and, therefore, usually yield a higher return. The increased risk for commercial loans is due to the type of collateral securing these loans. The increased risk also derives from the expectation that commercial loans generally will be serviced principally from the business’ operations, and those operations may not be successful. As a result of these additional complexities, variables and risks, commercial loans require more thorough underwriting and servicing than other types of loans. The Company had $61.6 million in commercial loans at December 31, 2004.

Commercial Real Estate

In addition to commercial loans secured by real estate, the Company makes commercial mortgage loans to finance the purchase of real property, which generally consists of real estate with completed structures. Commercial real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts and the repayment of loans is dependent, in large part, on sufficient income from the properties securing the loans to cover operating expenses and debt service. As a general practice, the Company requires its commercial real estate loans to be secured by well-managed income producing property with adequate margins and to be guaranteed by responsible parties. The Company’s commercial real estate loans are generally secured by first liens on real estate. Loans with fixed interest rates typically amortize over a 10 to 15 year period with balloon payments due at the end of one to five years. Accordingly, repayment of these loans may be subject to adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy to a greater extent than other types of loans. In underwriting commercial real estate loans, consideration is given to the property’s operating history, future operating projections, current and projected occupancy, location and physical condition. The underwriting analysis also includes credit checks, appraisals and a review of the financial condition of the borrower and guarantor. The Company had $75.2 million in commercial real estate loans at December 31, 2004.

Construction

The Company makes loans to finance the construction of residential and, to a limited extent, nonresidential properties. Construction loans generally are secured by first liens on real estate. The Company conducts periodic inspections, either directly or through an agent, prior to approval of periodic draws on these loans. Construction loans involve additional risks attributable to the fact that loan funds are advanced upon the security of a project under construction, and the project is of uncertain value prior to its completion. Because of uncertainties inherent in estimating construction costs, the market value of the completed project and the effects of governmental regulation on real property, it can be difficult to accurately evaluate the total funds required to complete a project and the related loan to value ratio. As a result of these uncertainties, construction lending often involves the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment dependent, in part, on the success of the ultimate project rather than the ability of a borrower or guarantor to repay the loan. If the Company is forced to foreclose on a project prior to completion, there is no assurance that it will be able to recover the entire unpaid portion of the loan. In addition, the Company may be required to fund additional amounts to complete a project and may have to hold the property for an indeterminate period of time. While the Company has underwriting procedures designed to identify what management believes to be acceptable levels of risk in construction lending, these procedures may not prevent losses from the risks described above. At December 31, 2004, the Company had $31.9 million in construction loans.

1-4 Family Residential

The Company offers a variety of mortgage loan products. The Company’s loans collateralized by one-to-four family residential real estate generally are originated in amounts of no more than 90% of the lower of cost or appraised value. The Company generally requires mortgage title insurance and hazard insurance in the amount of the loan. Of the mortgages originated, the Company generally retains mortgage loans with short terms or variable rates and sells longer-term fixed-rate loans that do not meet the Company’s credit underwriting standards. Prior to the acquisition of First American in September 1999, the Company sold such loans to Texas Independent Bank Mortgage Company; however, since the First American acquisition, the Company sells these loans directly into the secondary market.

As of December 31, 2004, the Company’s one-to-four family residential real estate loan portfolio (including $1.7 million in loans held for sale) was $147.6 million. Of this amount, $54.7 million is repriceable in one year or less and an additional $86.0 million is repriceable from one year to five years. These high percentages in short-term real estate loans are an effort by the Company to reduce its interest rate risk.

Consumer

The Company provides a wide variety of consumer loans including motor vehicle, watercraft, education loans, personal loans (collateralized and uncollateralized) and deposit account collateralized loans. The terms of these loans typically range from 12 to 60 months and vary based upon the nature of collateral and size of loan. Consumer loans entail greater risk than do residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of consumer loans that are unsecured or secured by rapidly depreciating assets such as automobiles. In such cases, any repossessed collateral for a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment for the outstanding loan balance. The remaining deficiency often does not warrant further substantial collection efforts against the borrower beyond obtaining a deficiency judgment. In addition, consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and thus are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws may limit the amount that can be recovered on such loans. During the last several years, management has placed tighter controls on consumer credit due to the high degree of personal bankruptcy filings nationwide. At December 31, 2004, the Company had $28.8 million in consumer loans.

Agriculture

The Company provides agricultural loans for short-term crop production, including cotton, milo and corn, farm equipment, cattle and agricultural real estate financing. The Company evaluates agricultural borrowers primarily based on their historical profitability, level of experience in their particular agricultural industry, overall financial capacity and the availability of secondary collateral to withstand economic and natural variations common

to the industry. Because agricultural loans present a higher level of risk associated with events caused by nature, and the volatility of the world market prices on commodities, the Company routinely makes on-site visits, inspections, and utilizes government guaranteed programs in order to monitor, identify and manage such risks. The Company had $11.0 million in agriculture loans at December 31, 2004.

The Company rarely makes loans at its legal lending limit. Lending officers are assigned various levels of loan approval authority based upon their respective levels of experience and expertise. All loans above $700,000 are evaluated and acted upon by the Executive Committee, which meets weekly. All new and renewed loans greater than $100,000 are reported monthly to the Board of Directors. All new and renewed loans of $400,000 or less are reported weekly to the Executive Committee. The Company’s strategy for approving or disapproving loans is to follow conservative loan policies and underwriting practices which include: (i) granting loans on a sound and collectible basis; (ii) investing funds properly for the benefit of shareholders and the protection of depositors; (iii) serving the legitimate needs of the community and the Company’s general market area while obtaining a balance between maximum yield and minimum risk; (iv) ensuring that primary and secondary sources of repayment are adequate in relation to the amount of the loan; (v) developing and maintaining adequate diversification of the loan portfolio as a whole and of the loans within each category; and (vi) ensuring that each loan is properly documented and, if appropriate, insurance coverage is adequate. The Company’s loan review and compliance personnel interact daily with commercial and consumer lenders to identify potential underwriting or technical exception variances. In addition, the Company has placed increased emphasis on the early identification of problem loans to aggressively seek resolution of the situations and thereby keep loan losses at a minimum.

The contractual maturity ranges of the commercial, agriculture, commercial real estate and construction and land development loan portfolios and the amount of such loans with predetermined and floating interest rates in each maturity range as of December 31, 2004, are summarized in the following table:

	December 31, 2004

	One Year or Less		After One Through Five Years		After Five Years		Total

	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial	$	40,833	$	16,525	$	4,244	$	61,602
Agriculture		7,026		3,502		435		10,963
Construction and land development		23,209		6,426		2,282		31,917
Commercial real estate		14,079		38,525		22,579		75,183

Total	$	85,147	$	64,978	$	29,540	$	179,665

Loans with a predetermined interest rate	$	51,742	$	52,107	$	10,056	$	113,905
Loans with a floating interest rate		33,405		12,871		19,484		65,760

Total	$	85,147	$	64,978	$	29,540	$	179,665

Nonperforming Assets

The Company has several procedures in place to assist it in maintaining the overall quality of its loan portfolio. The Company has established underwriting guidelines to be followed by its officers and also monitors its delinquency levels for any negative or adverse trends. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company’s loan portfolio will not become subject to increasing pressures from deteriorating borrower credit due to general economic conditions.

Nonperforming assets at December 31, 2004, increased $964,000, or 29.2%, to $4.3 million compared with $3.3 million at December 31, 2003. This increase reflects the addition of four lines of credit into non-accrual status. Although liquidation or payoff of all four lines of credit is anticipated within the next 12 months, reserves have been established for any anticipated exposure. Other real estate decreased from $743,000 as of December 31, 2003 to $692,000 as of December 31, 2004. The decrease is primarily attributed to the partial sale of collateral on one relationship. Continued aggressive collection efforts throughout the Company resulted in a minimal increase in accruing loans 90 days or more past due. The ratios of nonperforming assets to total loans plus other real estate were 1.13% and 0.90% for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

The Company generally places a loan on nonaccrual status and ceases to accrue interest when loan payment performance is deemed unsatisfactory. Loans where the interest payments jeopardize the collection of principal are placed on nonaccrual status, unless the loan is both well secured and in the process of collection. Cash payments received while a loan is classified as nonaccrual are recorded as a reduction of principal as long as doubt exists as to collection. If interest on nonaccrual loans had been accrued, such income would have been approximately $353,000, $214,000 and $310,000 for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The Company is sometimes required to revise a loan’s interest rate or repayment terms in a troubled debt restructuring; however, the Company had no restructured loans or additional nonperforming interest-earning assets at December 31, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 or 2000. In addition to regulatory examinations, the Company maintains an internal loan review staff and retains IBS on a semi-annual basis to evaluate the loan portfolio.

The Company considers a loan to be impaired based on current information and events, if it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The measurement of impaired loans is based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the loan’s observable market price or based on the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral-dependent.

The Company maintains current appraisals on loans secured by real estate, particularly those categorized as nonperforming loans and potential problem loans. In instances where updated appraisals reflect reduced collateral values, an evaluation of the borrower’s overall financial condition is made to determine the need, if any, for possible write-downs or appropriate additions to the allowance for loan losses. The Company records other real estate at the lower of its fair market value, minus estimated costs to sell the property, or the recorded investment in the loan on the date of transfer.

The following table presents information regarding past due loans and nonperforming assets at the dates indicated:

	December 31,

	2004			2003			2002			2001			2000

	(Dollars in thousands)
Nonaccrual loans	$	3,011		$	2,072		$	2,810		$	3,737		$	1,214
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more		565			489			404			1,912			3,488
Other real estate		692			743			1,111			562			274

Total nonperforming assets	$	4,268		$	3,304		$	4,325		$	6,211		$	4,976

Nonperforming assets to total loans and other real estate		1.13	%		0.90	%		1.18	%		1.87	%		1.73	%

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is a reserve established through charges to earnings in the form of a provision for loan losses. Management has established an allowance for loan losses, which it believes is adequate to absorb estimated losses in the Company’s loan portfolio. Based on an evaluation of the loan portfolio, management presents a quarterly review of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses to the Company’s Board of Directors. In making its evaluation, management considers the diversification by industry of the Company’s commercial loan portfolio, the effect of changes in the local real estate market on collateral values, the results of recent regulatory examinations, the effects on the loan portfolio of current economic indicators and their probable impact on borrowers, the amount of charge-offs for the period, the amount of nonperforming loans and related collateral security, the results of management’s internal loan review, its own peer group analysis and the evaluation of its loan portfolio through a semi-annual external loan review conducted by IBS. Charge-offs occur when loans are deemed to be uncollectible.

The Company follows an internal loan review program to evaluate the credit risk in the loan portfolio. Through the loan review process, the Company maintains an internally classified loan list, which, along with the delinquency list of loans, helps management assess the overall quality of the loan portfolio and the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Loans internally classified as “special mention” are those that contain a weakness that, if left unattended, could develop into a problem affecting the ultimate collectibility of the loan. Loans internally classified as “substandard” are those loans with clear and defined weaknesses such as highly leveraged positions, unfavorable financial ratios, uncertain repayment sources or poor financial condition, which may jeopardize recoverability of the loan. Loans internally classified as “doubtful” are those loans that have characteristics similar to substandard loans, but also have an increased risk that a loss may occur or at least a portion of the loan may require a charge-off if liquidated at present. Although loans classified as substandard do not duplicate loans classified as doubtful, both substandard and doubtful loans may include some loans that are past due at least 90 days, are on nonaccrual status or have been restructured. Loans internally classified as “loss” are those loans that are in the process of being charged off. At December 31, 2004, the Company had $10.9 million of internally classified loans compared with $9.0 million at December 31, 2003, an increase of $1.9 million, or 21.1%. This increase is primarily due to the classification of nine loan relationships, totaling $4.0 million which is partially offset by the improvement, workout, or foreclosure of 11 loan relationships totaling $2.0 million. One of the lines of credit added to classified loans totals $1.7 million and has collateral values sufficient to insure minimal exposure for the Company. Specific reserves have been established for these new lines based on their estimated exposure using liquidation values for collateral.

In order to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, the Company establishes both specific and general reserves. The Company establishes specific allocations for the majority of problem loans based on the estimated exposure in each individual loan. The exposure is generally identified by determining the present value of estimated future cash flows or the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. The Company establishes general reserves for non-problem loans primarily based on its historical loan loss experience, the volume and type of lending conducted by the Company, the amount of nonperforming assets, regulatory policies, generally accepted accounting principles, general economic conditions, and other factors related to the collectability of loans in the Company’s loan portfolios.

Loans are charged-off against the allowance for loan losses when appropriate. Although management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate to absorb estimated losses in the Company’s loan portfolio, the amount of the allowance is based on management’s judgment and future adjustments may be necessary if economic or other conditions differ from the assumptions used in making the initial determinations.

The following table presents, for the periods indicated, an analysis of the allowance for loan losses and other related data:

	Years Ended December 31,

	2004			2003			2002			2001			2000

	(Dollars in thousands)
Average loans outstanding	$	371,586		$	359,829		$	342,823		$	302,656		$	267,996

Gross loans outstanding at end of period	$	377,334		$	365,514		$	365,615		$	331,254		$	287,335

Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period	$	3,906		$	3,692		$	3,346		$	2,578		$	2,491
Provision for loan losses		930			1,075			1,260			1,385			595
Charge-offs:
Commercial		(247	)		(592	)		(279	)		(462	)		(360	)
Real estate		(274	)		(38	)		(375	)		(162	)		(146	)
Consumer		(286	)		(293	)		(418	)		(211	)		(172	)
Recoveries:
Commercial		17			9			28			30			80
Real estate		67			12			57			124			11
Consumer		41			41			73			64			79

Net charge-offs		(682	)		(861	)		(914	)		(617	)		(508	)

Allowance for loan losses at end of period	$	4,154		$	3,906		$	3,692		$	3,346		$	2,578

Ratio of allowance to end of period loans		1.10	%		1.07	%		1.01	%		1.01	%		0.90	%
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans		0.18	%		0.24	%		0.27	%		0.20	%		0.19	%
Ratio of allowance to end of period nonperforming loans		116.16	%		152.52	%		114.87	%		59.23	%		54.83	%

The following tables describe the allocation of the allowance for loan losses among various categories of loans and certain other information for the dates indicated. The allocation is made for analytical purposes and is not necessarily indicative of the categories in which future losses may occur. The total allowance is available to absorb losses from any segment of loans.

	December 31,

	2004					2003

	Amount		Percent of Loans to Total Loans			Amount		Percent of Loans to Total Loans

	(Dollars in thousands)
Balance of allowance for loan losses applicable to:
Commercial and agriculture	$	478		19.24	%	$	1,737		17.91	%
Real estate:
Construction and land development		2		8.46			—		6.02
1-4 family residential ⁽¹⁾		613		39.12			131		37.74
Commercial		248		19.92			192		21.88
Farmland		5		4.29			—		5.54
Multi-family residential		—		1.34			—		2.55
Consumer		114		7.63			301		8.36
Unallocated		2,694		—			1,545		—

Total allowance for loan losses	$	4,154		100.00	%	$	3,906		100.00	%

(1) The percentage of loans to total loans includes loans held for sale.

	December 31,

	2002					2001					2000

	Amount		Percent of Loans to Total Loans			Amount		Percent of Loans to Total Loans			Amount		Percent of Loans to Total Loans

Balance of allowance for loan losses applicable to:
Commercial and agriculture	$	1,892		18.78	%	$	1,792		22.71	%	$	1,430		26.07	%
Real estate:
Construction and land development		—		3.83			—		2.87			—		2.55
1-4 family residential ⁽¹⁾		138		39.63			117		38.07			139		35.71
Commercial		173		22.33			138		20.58			193		21.31
Farmland		—		4.04			—		2.96			—		2.69
Multi-family residential		—		2.54			—		2.81			—		1.72
Consumer		320		8.85			333		10.00			289		9.95
Unallocated		1,169		—			966		—			527		—

Total allowance for loan losses	$	3,692		100.00	%	$	3,346		100.00	%	$	2,578		100.00	%

(1) The percentage of loans to total loans includes loans held for sale.

Securities

The Company uses its securities portfolio to ensure liquidity for cash requirements, to manage interest rate risk, to provide a source of income, to ensure collateral is available for municipal pledging requirements and to manage asset quality. At December 31, 2004, investment securities totaled $103.8 million, an increase of $4.1 million from $99.6 million at December 31, 2003. The increase was primarily attributable to $36.1 million in securities purchased, partially offset by $31.0 million in securities sold and in principal repayments. The net unrealized gain in the securities portfolio at December 31, 2004 was $400,000 compared with $704,000 at December 31, 2003. At December 31, 2004, securities represented 19.1% of total assets compared to 19.3% of total assets at December 31, 2003. The average yield on the securities portfolio for 2004 was 3.86% compared to an average yield of 3.64% for 2003 and 5.05% for 2002.

During 2004, the securities portfolio mix changed within various categories. U.S. Government securities decreased from $7.2 million at December 31, 2003 to $6.2 million at December 31, 2004. The Company also had a decrease of $4.4 million in mortgage-backed securities from $87.2 million at December 31, 2003 to $82.9 million at December 31, 2004. The Company’s investments in equity securities increased from $3.9 million at December 31, 2003 to $4.1 million at December 31, 2004, an increase of $198,000 or 5.1%. Investments in obligations of state and political subdivisions increased from $1.3 million at December 31, 2003 to $10.6 million at December 31, 2004, an increase of $9.4 million.

The following table summarizes the fair value of securities classified as available for sale held by the Company as of the dates shown. At these dates, there were no securities classified as held to maturity.

	December 31,

	2004		2003		2002

	(Dollars in thousands)
U.S. government agency securities	$	6,159	$	7,194	$	14,127
Mortgage-backed securities		82,861		87,248		63,148
Collaterized mortgage obligations		—		—		25,280
Equity securities		4,100		3,902		3,165
Obligations of state and political subdivisions		10,631		1,270		1,272

Total securities	$	103,751	$	99,614	$	106,992

The following table summarizes the contractual maturity of securities available for sale based on fair value and their weighted average yields as of December 31, 2004. For purposes of this table, tax-exempt obligations are not computed on a tax-equivalent basis:

	December 31, 2004

	Within One Year					After One Year but Within Five Years					After Five Years but Within Ten Years					After Ten Years					Total

	Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield

	(Dollars in thousands)
U.S. Government securities	$	—		—	%	$	6,159		3.47	%	$	—		—	%	$	—		—	%	$	6,159		3.47	%
Mortgage-backed securities		—		—			—		—			26,969		3.91			55,892		4.38			82,861		4.25
Equity securities		—		—			—		—			—		—			4,100		1.88			4,100		1.88
Obligations of state and political subdivisions		120		4.21			4,950		3.25			4,196		3.48			1,365		3.42			10,631		3.38

Total	$	120		4.21	%	$	11,109		3.38	%	$	31,165		3.85	%	$	61,357		4.19	%	$	103,751		4.02	%

The Company classifies debt and equity securities at the date of purchase into one of two categories: held-to-maturity or available-for-sale. At each reporting date, the appropriateness of the classification is reassessed. Investments in debt securities are classified as held-to-maturity and measured at amortized cost in the financial statements only if management has the positive intent and ability to hold those securities to maturity. Investments not classified as held-to-maturity are classified as available-for-sale and measured at fair value in the financial statements with unrealized gains and losses reported, net of tax, in a separate component of shareholders’ equity until realized. The Company had no securities classified as held-to-maturity at December 31, 2004, 2003 or 2002.

Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are securities, which have been developed by pooling a number of real estate mortgages and are principally issued by or guaranteed by federal agencies such as the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac). These securities are deemed to have high credit ratings and regular monthly cash flows of principal and interest, which are guaranteed by the issuing agencies. All the Company’s mortgage-backed securities at December 31, 2004 were agency-issued collateral obligations.

At December 31, 2004, 67.5% of the mortgage-backed securities held by the Company had final maturities of more than 10 years. However, unlike U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agency securities, which have a lump sum payment at maturity, mortgage-backed securities provide cash flows from regular principal and interest payments and principal prepayments throughout the lives of the securities. Therefore, the average life, or the average amount of time until the Company receives the total amount invested, of the mortgage-backed security will be shorter than the contractual maturity. The Company estimates the remaining average life of the fixed-rate mortgage-backed security portfolio to be less than three years. These securities, when purchased at a premium, will generally suffer decreasing net yields as interest rates drop because homeowners tend to refinance their mortgages. Thus, the premium paid must be amortized over a shorter period. Therefore, securities when purchased at a discount will obtain higher net yields in a decreasing interest rate environment. As interest rates rise, the opposite will generally be true. During a period of increasing interest rates, fixed rate mortgage-backed securities do not tend to experience heavy prepayments of principal and consequently, the average lives of these securities will not be unduly shortened.

Premises and Equipment

Premises and equipment totaled $13.5 million at December 31, 2004 and $13.2 million at December 31, 2003. The net change reflects an increase of $288,000, or 2.2% in fixed assets. The increase is primarily due to the opening and beginning of construction of the new Texarkana West and Mount Vernon locations, partially offset by depreciation recorded for the year.

Other Assets

The Company owns single premium insurance policies insuring the lives of certain key senior officers. The net cash surrender value of these polices totaled $5.3 million at December 31, 2004 and $6.2 million at December 31, 2003.

Deposits

The Company’s lending and investing activities are funded primarily by deposits. The Company offers a variety of deposit accounts having a wide range of interest rates and terms. The Company’s deposit accounts consist of demand, savings, money market and time accounts. The Company relies primarily on competitive pricing policies and customer service to attract and retain these deposits. The Company does not have or accept any brokered deposits.

Total deposits increased to $433.7 million at December 31, 2004, from $407.8 million at December 31, 2003, an increase of $25.9 million, or 6.3%. Noninterest-bearing deposits increased from $72.2 million at December 31, 2003, to $82.3 million at December 31, 2004, an increase of $10.1 million, or 14.0%. Savings and money market accounts increased $8.7 million, or 11.6%, to $84.1 million at December 31, 2004 from $75.3 million at December 31, 2003. NOW accounts increased from $44.4 million at December 31, 2003 to $50.1 million at December 31, 2004, an increase of $5.7 million, or 12.7%. The Company’s ratio of average noninterest-bearing demand deposits to average total deposits for years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, were 18.3%, 16.3%, and 15.7%, respectively.

The daily average balances and weighted average rates paid on deposits for each of the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 are presented below:

	Years Ended December 31,

	2004					2003					2002

	Amount		Rate			Amount		Rate			Amount		Rate

	(Dollars in thousands)
Savings accounts	$	15,821		0.53	%	$	14,781		0.69	%	$	11,774		1.44	%
NOW accounts		45,615		0.86			43,781		0.71			35,740		1.04
Money market accounts		63,481		1.16			62,877		0.84			61,150		1.58
Time deposits less than $100,000		131,300		1.99			130,770		2.64			132,800		3.53
Time deposits $100,000 and over		87,537		2.57			102,206		2.79			98,396		3.70

Total interest-bearing deposits	$	343,754		1.77	%	$	354,415		2.04	%	$	339,860		2.89	%
Noninterest-bearing deposits		76,838		—			68,868		—			63,265		—

Total deposits	$	420,592		1.44	%	$	423,283		1.71	%	$	403,125		2.44	%

The following table sets forth the amount of the Company’s time deposits $100,000 and over at December 31, 2004 by time remaining until maturity:

	December 31, 2004

	(Dollars in thousands)
3 months or less	$	16,364
Over 3 months through 6 months		11,230
Over 6 months through 1 year		42,074
Over 1 year		22,631

Total	$	92,299

Other Borrowings

The Company utilizes borrowing to supplement deposits to fund its lending and investing activities. Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances may be utilized from time to time as either a short-term funding source or a longer-term funding source. FHLB advances can be particularly attractive as a longer-term funding source to balance interest rate sensitivity and reduce interest rate risk. The Company is eligible for two borrowing programs through the FHLB. The first, called “Short Term Fixed,” requires delivery of eligible securities for collateral. Maturities under this program range from 1-35 days. The Company does not currently have any borrowings under this program. As of December 31, 2004, the Company does not have any of its investment securities in safekeeping at the FHLB.

The second borrowing program, the “Blanket Borrowing Program,” is under a borrowing agreement which does not require the delivery of specific collateral. Borrowings are limited by the level of qualified pledgable real estate loans held and FHLB stock owned. At December 31, 2004, the Company had approximately $54.6 million borrowed out of a potential $109.5 million available under this program, leaving approximately $54.9 million in available borrowings.

In March 2000, the Company formed Guaranty (TX) Capital Trust I (“Trust I”) and on March 23, 2000, Trust I issued $7.0 million (7,000 shares with a liquidation amount of $1,000 per security) of 10.875% Fixed Rate Capital Trust Pass-through Securities (“TruPS I”) to a third party in a private placement. Concurrent with the issuance of the TruPS I, Trust I issued common securities to the Company in the aggregate liquidation value of $217,000. Trust I invested the total proceeds from the sale of the TruPS I and the common securities in $7.2 million of the Company’s 10.875% Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures (the “Debentures I”). The Debentures I will mature on March 8, 2030, which date may be shortened to a date not earlier than March 8, 2010, if certain conditions are met (including the Company having received prior approval of the Federal Reserve and any other required regulatory approvals). The net proceeds from the sale of the Debentures I were used to repurchase shares of the Company’s stock, provide a $1.5 million additional capital contribution to the Bank and provide for additional working capital to support growth.

With certain exceptions, the amount of the principal and any accrued and unpaid interest on the Debentures I are subordinated in right of payment to the prior payment in full of all senior indebtedness of the Company. The terms of the Debentures I are such that they qualify as Tier 1 capital under the Federal Reserve’s regulatory capital guidelines applicable to bank holding companies. Interest on the Debentures I is payable semi-annually on March 8 and September 8 of each year. The interest is deferrable on a cumulative basis for up to five consecutive years following a suspension of dividend payments on all other capital stock. No principal payments are due until maturity on March 8, 2030.

On any March 8 or September 8 on or after March 8, 2010 and prior to maturity, the Debentures I are redeemable for cash at the option of the Company, on at least 30 but not more than 60 days notice, in whole or in part, at the redemption prices set forth in the table below, plus accrued interest to the date of redemption:

If Redeemed During 12 Months Beginning March 8,	Percentage of Principal Amount	If Redeemed During 12 Months Beginning March 8,	Percentage of Principal Amount

2010	105.44%	2016	102.18%
2011	104.89%	2017	101.63%
2012	104.35%	2018	101.09%
2013	103.81%	2019	100.54%
2014	103.26%	2020 and after	100.00%
2015	102.72%

Upon the occurrence of certain special events, the Company will have the right to call the securities at par at any time with the prior approval of the Federal Reserve and any other required regulatory approvals.

In October 2002, the Company formed Guaranty (TX) Capital Trust II (“Trust II” and together with Trust I, the “Trusts”) and on October 30, 2002, Trust II issued $3.0 million (3,000 shares with a liquidation amount of $1,000 per security) of Capital Trust Pass-through Securities (“TruPS II”) to a third party in a private placement. Concurrent with the issuance of the TruPS II, Trust II issued common securities to the Company in the aggregate liquidation value of $93,000. Trust II invested the total proceeds from the sale of the TruPS II and the common securities in $3.1 million of the Company’s Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures (the “Debentures II”). The Debentures II will mature on October 30, 2032, which date may be shortened to a date not earlier than October 30, 2012, if certain conditions are met (including the Company having received prior approval of the Federal Reserve and any other required regulatory approvals). The net proceeds from the sale of the Debentures II were used to repurchase shares of the Company’s stock and provide for additional working capital to support growth.

With certain exceptions, the amount of the principal and any accrued and unpaid interest on the Debentures II are subordinated in right of payment to the prior payment in full of all senior indebtedness of the Company. The terms of the Debentures II are such that they qualify as Tier 1 capital under the Federal Reserve’s regulatory capital guidelines applicable to bank holding companies. Interest on the Debentures II is payable quarterly on January 30, April 30, July 30, and October 30 of each year at a fixed rate per annum equal to 7.94% until October 2012 and a variable rate per annum, reset quarterly, equal to 3 month LIBOR plus 3.35%, thereafter. The interest is deferrable on a cumulative basis for up to five consecutive years following a suspension of dividend payments on all other capital stock. No principal payments are due until maturity on October 30, 2032.

On any interest payment date on or after October 30, 2012 and prior to maturity date, the Debentures II are redeemable for cash at the option of the Company, on at least 30 but not more than 60 days notice, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount to be redeemed, plus accrued interest to the date of redemption.

On January 1, 2004, the Company adopted FIN46R, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51 (Revised December 2003). Upon adoption, the subsidiary trusts that previously issued the outstanding TruPS were deconsolidated from the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Instead, the junior subordinated debentures issued by the Company to these subsidiary trusts are shown as liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets and interest expense associated with the junior subordinated debentures is shown in the consolidated statements of earnings. As a result, the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004 reflect the adoption of FIN46R and include $10.3 million in junior subordinated debentures. The Company’s consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2003 and for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 do not reflect the adoption of FIN46R and include $10.0 million in long-term debt, giving effect to the consolidation elimination of the $310,000 common ownership interest. The overall impact of this deconsolidation did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Contractual Obligations

The following table sets forth the Company’s future cash payments associated with its contractual obligations (other than deposit obligations) by maturity period as of December 31, 2004 (in thousands):

	Payments due by period

	Within One Year		After One but Within Three Years		After Three but Within Five Years		After Five Years		Total

Junior subordinated debentures	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	10,310	$	10,310
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances		16,742		30,099		7,379		333		54,553

Total	$	16,742	$	30,099	$	7,379	$	10,643	$	64,863

Capital Resources and Liquidity

The Company’s capital management consists of providing equity to support both current and future operations. The Company is subject to capital adequacy requirements imposed by the Federal Reserve and the Bank is subject to capital adequacy requirements imposed by the FDIC and the TDB. Both the Federal Reserve and the FDIC have adopted risk-based capital requirements for assessing bank holding company and bank capital adequacy. These standards define capital and establish minimum capital requirements in relation to assets and off-balance sheet exposure, adjusted for credit risk. The risk-based capital standards currently in effect are designed to make regulatory capital requirements more sensitive to differences in risk profiles among bank holding companies and banks, to account for off-balance sheet exposure and to minimize disincentives for holding liquid assets. Assets and off-balance sheet items are assigned to broad risk categories, each with appropriate relative risk weights. The resulting capital ratios represent capital as a percentage of total risk-weighted assets and off-balance sheet items.

The risk-based capital standards issued by the Federal Reserve require all bank holding companies to have “Tier 1 capital” of at least 4.0% and “total risk-based” capital (Tier 1 and Tier 2) of at least 8.0% of total risk-adjusted assets. “Tier 1 capital” generally includes common shareholders’ equity and qualifying perpetual preferred stock together with related surpluses and retained earnings, less deductions for goodwill and various other intangibles. “Tier 2 capital” may consist of a limited amount of intermediate-term preferred stock, a limited amount of term subordinated debt, certain hybrid capital instruments and other debt securities, perpetual preferred stock not qualifying as Tier 1 capital, and a limited amount of the general valuation allowance for loan losses. The sum of Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital is “total risk-based capital”.

The Federal Reserve has also adopted guidelines which supplement the risk-based capital guidelines with a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to average total consolidated assets (“leverage ratio”) of 3.0% for certain institutions with well diversified risk, including no undue interest rate exposure; excellent asset quality; high liquidity; good earnings; and that are generally considered to be strong banking organizations, rated composite 1 under applicable federal guidelines, and that are not experiencing or anticipating significant growth. Other banking organizations are required to maintain a leverage ratio of at least 4.0% to 5.0%. These rules further provide that banking organizations experiencing internal growth or making acquisitions will be expected to maintain capital positions substantially above the minimum supervisory levels and comparable to peer group averages, without significant reliance on intangible assets.

Pursuant to FDICIA, each federal banking agency revised its risk-based capital standards to ensure that those standards take adequate account of interest rate risk, concentration of credit risk and the risks of nontraditional activities, as well as reflect the actual performance and expected risk of loss on multi-family mortgages. The Bank is subject to capital adequacy guidelines of the FDIC that are substantially similar to the Federal Reserve’s guidelines. Also pursuant to FDICIA, the FDIC has promulgated regulations setting the levels at which an insured institution such as the Bank would be considered “well capitalized,” “adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized” and “critically undercapitalized.” The Bank is classified “well capitalized” for purposes of the FDIC’s prompt corrective action regulations.

Shareholders’ equity increased to $38.6 million at December 31, 2004, from $36.4 million at December 31, 2003, an increase of $2.2 million, or 6.0%. This increase was primarily the result of net earnings of $3.7 million, partially offset by the payment of common stock dividends of $1.2 million, the decrease in net unrealized gain on available for sale securities of $200,000 and the purchase of treasury stock of $225,000.

The following table provides a comparison of the Company’s and the Bank’s leverage and risk-weighted capital ratios as of December 31, 2004 to the minimum and well-capitalized regulatory standards:

	Minimum Required For Capital Adequacy Purposes			To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions			Actual Ratio at December 31, 2004

The Company
Leverage ratio		4.00	%(1)		N/A			8.73	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio		4.00	%		N/A			12.52	%
Risk-based capital ratio		8.00	%		N/A			13.65	%

The Bank
Leverage ratio		3.00	%(2)		5.00	%		7.74	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio		4.00	%		6.00	%		11.11	%
Risk-based capital ratio		8.00	%		10.00	%		12.25	%

⁽¹⁾ The Federal Reserve may require the Company to maintain a leverage ratio above the required minimum.

⁽²⁾ The FDIC may require the Bank to maintain a leverage ratio above the required minimum.

At December 31, 2004, the Company’s capital ratios exceeded the minimums required by regulatory guidelines. The junior subordinated debentures issued by the trusts are currently included in the Company’s Tier 1 capital for regulatory purposes. However, because the debentures are no longer a part of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, the Federal Reserve may in the future disallow inclusion of the junior subordinated debentures in Tier 1 capital for regulatory purposes.

On May 6, 2004, the Federal Reserve issued proposed rules that would continue to allow junior subordinated debentures to be included in Tier 1 capital, subject to stricter quantitative and qualitative limits. Currently, junior subordinated debentures and qualifying perpetual preferred stock are limited in the aggregate to no more than 25% of a bank holding company’s core capital elements. The proposed rule would amend the existing limit by providing that restricted core capital elements (including junior subordinated debentures and qualifying perpetual preferred stock) can be no more than 25% of core capital, net of goodwill. Because the 25% limit currently is calculated without deducting goodwill, the proposal has the effect of reducing the amount of junior subordinated debentures that the Company can include in Tier 1 capital. In addition, under the proposal, the amount of such excess junior subordinated debentures (when aggregated with subordinated debt securities and certain other investments) includable in Tier 2 capital would be limited to 50% of Tier 1 capital. Assuming these proposed rules were effective at December 31, 2004, there would not be any change to the Company’s capital ratios. The new quantitative limits, if adopted in the form proposed, will be fully effective March 31, 2007.

Each of the trusts issued junior subordinated debentures with 30-year maturity. The proposed rules provide that in the last five years before the junior subordinated debentures mature, the associated debentures will be excluded from Tier 1 capital and included in Tier 2 capital, subject (together with subordinated debt and certain other investments) to an aggregate limit of 50% of Tier 1 capital. In addition, under the proposal, the debentures during this five-year period would be amortized out of Tier 2 capital by one-fifth each year and excluded from Tier 2 capital completely during the year prior to their maturity.

Liquidity involves the Company’s ability to raise funds to support asset growth or reduce assets to meet deposit withdrawals and other payment obligations, to maintain reserve requirements and otherwise to operate the Company on an ongoing basis. The Company’s liquidity needs are met primarily by financing activities, which consists mainly of growth in core deposits, supplemented by investment securities and earnings through operating activities. Access to purchased funds from correspondent banks is available and has been utilized on occasion to take advantage of investment opportunities. The cash and federal funds sold position, supplemented by amortizing investments along with payments and maturities within the loan portfolio, have historically created an adequate liquidity position.

The Company’s liquidity management objective is to meet maturing debt obligations, fund loan commitments and deposit withdrawals, and manage operations on a cost effective basis. Management believes that sufficient resources are available to meet the Company’s liquidity objective through its debt maturity structure, holdings of liquid assets, and access to the capital markets through a variety of funding vehicles. Proper liquidity management is crucial to ensure that the Company is able to take advantage of new business opportunities as well as meet the demands of its customers.

The Company’s traditional funding sources consist primarily of core deposits, established federal funds and other borrowing lines with major banks, proceeds from matured investments, contracts to repurchase investment securities and principal and interest repayments on loans.

Management is not aware of any events that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s liquidity, capital resources or operations. In addition, management is not aware of any regulatory recommendations regarding liquidity, which if implemented, would have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company enters into contractual commitments to extend credit, normally with fixed expiration dates or termination clauses, at specified rates and for specific purposes. Customers use credit commitments to ensure that funds will be available for working capital purposes, for capital expenditures and to ensure access to funds at specified terms and conditions. Substantially all of the Company’s commitments to extend credit are contingent upon customers maintaining specific credit standards at the time of loan funding. Management assesses the credit risk associated with certain commitments to extend credit in determining the level of the allowance for loan losses.

Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The Company’s policies generally require that letters of credit arrangements contain security and debt covenants similar to those contained in loan agreements. In the event the customer does not perform in accordance with the terms of the agreement with the third party, the Company would be required to fund the commitment. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make is represented by the contractual amount shown in the table below. If the commitment were funded, the Company would be entitled to seek recovery from the customer. As of December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, no amounts have been recorded as liabilities for the Bank’s potential obligations under these guarantees.

The Company’s commitments associated with outstanding letters of credit and commitments to extend credit as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 are summarized below. Since commitments associated with letters of credit and commitments to extend credit may expire unused, the amounts shown do not necessarily reflect the actual future cash funding requirements:

	Contract or Notional Amount December 31,

	2004		2003

	(Dollars in thousands)
Commitments to extend credit	$	29,166	$	23,878
Letters of credit		1,416		1,491

Industry Segments

The principal business of the Company is overseeing the business of the Bank. The Company has no significant assets other than its investment in the Bank; therefore, the banking operation is the Company’s only reportable segment.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) published FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“FAS 123(R)” or the “Statement”). FAS 123(R) requires that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions, including grants of employee stock options, be recognized in financial statements. That cost will be measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. FAS 123(R) permits the use of any option-pricing model that meets the fair value objective in the statement. Modifications of share-based payments will be treated as replacement awards with the cost of the incremental value recorded in the financial statements. The Company elected to transition to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation during 2002 using the modified prospective method as prescribed by SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure,” an amendment of FAS 123(R). The Statement is effective at the beginning of the third quarter of 2005. The adoption of this statement will not have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements of the Company.

FIN No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, establishes accounting guidance for consolidation of variable interest entities (VIE) that function to support the activities of the primary beneficiary. Prior to the implementation of FIN 46, VIEs were generally consolidated by an enterprise when the enterprise had a controlling financial interest through ownership of a majority of voting interest in the entity. The provisions of FIN 46 were effective immediately for all arrangements entered into after January 31, 2003. In December 2003, the FASB issued a revision to FIN 46 (FIN 46R) which clarified certain implementation issues and revised implementation dates for VIE’s created before January 31, 2003. Under the new guidance, special effective date provisions apply to enterprises that have fully or partially applied FIN 46 prior to issuance of the revised Interpretation. Otherwise, application of FIN 46R (or FIN 46) is required in financial statements of public entities that have interests in special-purpose entities for periods ending after December 15, 2003. Application by public entities, other than small business issuers, for all other types of VIEs is required in financial statements for periods ending after March 15, 2004. The Company deconsolidated the trusts created upon the issuance of the junior subordinated debentures as of March 31, 2004. In May 2004, the Federal Reserve released proposed rules for the capital treatment of junior subordinated debentures. The proposed rules would limit the aggregate amount of junior subordinated debentures and certain other capital elements to 25% of core capital, net of goodwill. Because the Company’s aggregate amount of junior subordinated debentures is below the limit of 25% of Tier I capital, net of goodwill, the proposal has no effect on the amount of junior subordinated debentures that the Company can include in Tier I capital. Additionally, the rules provide that junior subordinated debentures no longer qualify for Tier I capital within five years of their maturity.

In December 2003, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued Statement of Position 03-3, “Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer” (“SOP 03-3”). SOP 03-3 requires loans acquired through a transfer, such as a business combination, where there are differences in expected cash flows and contractual cash flows due in part to credit quality, to be recognized at their fair value. Under the provisions of SOP 03-3 any future excess of cash flows over the original expected cash flows is to be recognized as an adjustment of future yield. Future decreases in actual cash flow compared to the original expected cash flow is recognized as a valuation allowance and expensed immediately. Under SOP 03-3, valuation allowances cannot be created or “carried over” in the initial accounting for impaired loans acquired. SOP 03-3 is effective for impaired loans acquired in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004. The Company does not expect adoption to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.

In March 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) reached consensus on the guidance provided by Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 03-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and its Application to Certain Investments” (“EITF 03-1”). The guidance is applicable to debt and equity securities that are within the scope of FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities” and certain other investments. EITF 03-1 specifics that an impairment would be considered other-than-temporary unless (a) the investor has the ability and intent to hold an investment for a reasonable period of time sufficient for the recovery of the fair value up to (or beyond) the cost of the investment and (b) evidence indicating the cost of the investment is recoverable within a reasonable period of time outweighs evidence to the contrary. EITF 03-1 cost method investment and disclosure provisions are effective for reporting periods ending after June 15, 2004. The measurement and recognition provisions relating to debt and equity securities have been delayed until the FASB issues additional guidance. The implementation of this provision did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company’s Asset Liability and Funds Management Policy provides management with the necessary guidelines for effective funds management, and the Company has established a measurement system for monitoring its net interest rate sensitivity position. The Company manages its sensitivity position within established guidelines.

As a financial institution, the Company’s primary component of market risk is interest rate volatility. Interest rate risk is the potential of economic losses due to future interest rate changes. These economic losses can be reflected as a loss of future net interest income and/or a loss of current fair market values. The objective is to measure the effect on net interest income and to adjust the balance sheet to minimize the inherent risk while at the same time maximizing income.

The Company’s exposure to interest rate risk is managed by the Asset Liability Committee (“ALCO”), which is composed of senior officers of the Company, in accordance with policies approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. The ALCO formulates strategies based on appropriate levels in interest rate risk. In determining the appropriate level of interest rate risk, the ALCO considers the impact on earnings and capital based on the current outlook on interest rates, potential changes in interest rates, regional economies, liquidity, business strategies, and other factors. The ALCO meets regularly to review, among other things, the sensitivity of assets and liabilities to interest rate changes, the book and market values of assets and liabilities, unrealized gains and losses, purchase and sale activity, commitments to originate loans, and the maturities of investments and borrowings. Additionally, the ALCO reviews liquidity, cash flow flexibility, maturities of deposits and consumer and commercial deposit activity. Management uses two methodologies to manage interest rate risk: (i) an analysis of relationships between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities; and (ii) interest rate shock simulation models. The Company has traditionally managed its business to reduce its overall exposure to changes in interest rates, however, under current policies of the Company’s Board of Directors, management has been given some latitude to increase the Company’s interest rate sensitivity position within certain limits if, in management’s judgment, it will enhance profitability. As a result, changes in market interest rates may have a greater impact on the Company’s financial performance in the future than they have had historically.

To effectively measure and manage interest rate risk, the Company uses interest rate shock simulation models to determine the impact on net interest income under various interest rate scenarios, balance sheet trends and strategies. From these simulations, interest rate risk is quantified and appropriate strategies are developed and implemented. Additionally, duration and market value sensitivity measures are utilized when they provide added value to the overall interest rate risk management process. The overall interest rate risk position and strategies are reviewed by the Company’s Board of Directors on an ongoing basis. The Company manages its exposure to interest rates by structuring its balance sheet in the ordinary course of business. The Company does not currently enter into instruments such as leveraged derivatives, structured notes, interest rate swaps, caps, floors, financial options, financial futures contracts or forward delivery contracts for the purpose of reducing interest rate risk.

The impact on future net earnings based on interest sensitive assets and liabilities held at December 31, 2004 using the interest rate shock simulation is as follows:

Change in Interest Rates	% Change in Net Earnings

+ 300		13.72	%
+200		10.15
+100		6.75
Base		—
- 100		(13.38	)
- 200		(26.17	)
- 300		(39.15	)

The computation of prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are based on numerous assumptions, including relative levels of interest rates, asset prepayments, deposit decay and changes in repricing levels of deposits to general market rates, and should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results. Further, the computations do not take into account any actions that the Company may undertake in response to changes in interest rates.

An interest rate sensitive asset or liability is one that, within a defined time period, either matures or experiences an interest rate change in line with general market interest rates. The management of interest rate risk is performed by analyzing the maturity and repricing relationships between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities at specific points in time (“GAP”) and by analyzing the effects of interest rate changes on net interest income over specific periods of time by projecting the performance of the mix of assets and liabilities in varied interest rate environments. Interest rate sensitivity reflects the potential effect on net interest income of a movement in interest rates. A company is considered to be asset sensitive, or having a positive GAP, when the amount of its interest-earning assets maturing or repricing within a given period exceeds the amount of its interest-bearing liabilities also maturing or repricing within that time period. Conversely, a company is considered to be liability sensitive, or having a negative GAP, when the amount of its interest-bearing liabilities maturing or repricing within a given period exceeds the amount of its interest-earning assets also maturing or repricing within that time period. During a period of rising interest rates, a negative GAP would tend to affect net interest income adversely, while a positive GAP would tend to result in an increase in net interest income. During a period of falling interest rates, a negative GAP would tend to result in an increase in net interest income, while a positive GAP would tend to affect net interest income adversely. However, it is management’s intent to achieve a proper balance so that incorrect rate forecasts should not have a significant impact on earnings.

The following table sets forth an interest rate sensitivity analysis for the Company at December 31, 2004:

	Volumes Subject to Repricing Within

	0-30 days			31-180 days			181-365 days			2-3 years			4-5 years			Greater than 5 years			Total

	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Interest-bearing time deposits	$	—		$	3,284		$	1,693		$	7,756		$	90		$	—		$	12,823
Securities		1,441			7,319			8,524			30,199			28,396			27,872			103,751
Loans		74,590			74,225			68,081			148,691			4,292			7,455			377,334
Federal funds sold		9,075			—			—			—			—			—			9,075

Total interest-earning assets		85,106			84,828			78,298			186,646			32,778			35,327			502,983

Interest-bearing liabilities:
NOW, money market and savings deposits		134,111			—			—			—			—			—			134,111
Certificates of deposit and other time deposits		9,908			54,354			97,937			33,842			21,159			130			217,330
Federal funds purchased		—			—			—			—			—			—			—
FHLB advances		2,014			7,070			7,658			30,099			7,379			333			54,553
Junior subordinated debentures		—			—			—			—			—			10,310			10,310

Total interest-bearing liabilities		146,033			61,424			105,595			63,941			28,538			10,773			416,304

Period GAP	$	(60,927	)	$	23,404		$	(27,297	)	$	122,705		$	4,240		$	24,554		$	86,679
Cumulative GAP	$	(60,927	)	$	(37,523	)	$	(64,820	)	$	57,885		$	62,125		$	86,679
Period GAP to total assets		(11.24	)%		4.32	%		(5.04	)%		22.64	%		0.78	%		4.53	%		15.99	%
Cumulative GAP to total assets		(11.24	)%		(6.92	)%		(11.96	)%		10.68	%		11.46	%		15.99	%
Cumulative interest-earning assets to cumulative interest-bearing liabilities		58.28	%		81.91	%		79.29	%		115.35	%		115.32	%		120.82	%

The Company’s one-year cumulative GAP position at December 31, 2004, was negative $64.8 million or 11.96% of assets. This is a one-day position that is continually changing and is not indicative of the Company’s position at any other time. While the GAP position is a useful tool in measuring interest rate risk and contributes toward effective asset and liability management, it is difficult to predict the effect of changing interest rates solely on that measure, without accounting for alterations in the maturity or repricing characteristics of the balance sheet that occur during changes in market interest rates. For example, the GAP position reflects only the prepayment assumptions pertaining to the current rate environment. Assets tend to prepay more rapidly during periods of declining interest rates than during periods of rising interest rates. Because of this and other risk factors not contemplated by the GAP position, an institution could have a matched GAP position in the current rate environment and still have its net interest income exposed to increased rate risk. To better qualify and account for the variables not incorporated into GAP analysis, the Company utilizes an interest rate simulation model as discussed previously. The Company maintains a Rate Committee and the ALCO that reviews the Company’s interest rate risk position on a weekly or monthly basis, respectively.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The financial statements, the reports thereon, the notes thereto and supplementary data commence at page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Condensed quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 were as follows:

	QUARTER ENDED 2004

	(unaudited)
	Dec. 31		Sept. 30		June 30		March 31

	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Interest income	$	7,030	$	6,787	$	6,512	$	6,700
Interest expense		2,509		2,307		2,171		2,150

Net interest income		4,521		4,480		4,341		4,550
Provision for loan losses		250		200		230		250

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		4,271		4,280		4,111		4,300
Noninterest income		1,000		1,392		1,235		1,228
Noninterest expense		4,106		4,272		4,090		4,114

Earnings before taxes		1,165		1,400		1,256		1,414
Provision for income tax expense		316		462		415		382

Net earnings	$	849	$	938	$	841	$	1,032

Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.29	$	0.32	$	0.29	$	0.35
Diluted	$	0.29	$	0.32	$	0.28	$	0.35

	QUARTER ENDED 2003

	(unaudited)
	Dec. 31		Sept. 30		June 30		March 31

	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Interest income	$	6,799	$	6,722	$	7,001	$	7,042
Interest expense		2,229		2,413		2,771		2,829

Net interest income		4,570		4,309		4,230		4,213
Provision for loan losses		300		250		150		375

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		4,270		4,059		4,080		3,838
Noninterest income		1,155		1,209		1,187		1,386
Noninterest expense		3,918		3,963		4,004		3,952

Earnings before taxes		1,507		1,305		1,263		1,272
Provision for income tax expense		418		370		478		237

Net earnings	$	1,089	$	935	$	785	$	1,035

Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.37	$	0.32	$	0.27	$	0.36
Diluted	$	0.37	$	0.31	$	0.27	$	0.35

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)). Based on this evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported to the Company’s management within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

Changes in Internal Controls

There were no significant changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent year-end that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

None

PART III

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

The information under the captions “Election of Directors,” “Continuing Directors and Executive Officers” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement relating to its 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “2005 Proxy Statement”), which will be filed within 120 days after December 31, 2004, is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.

Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. has adopted a Code of Ethics and Conduct Policy that includes a conflict of interest policy and applies to all directors, officers, and employees. All directors, officers, and employees are required to affirm annually, in writing, their acceptance of the Policy. A copy of the Code of Ethics and Conduct Policy is available for review at the Company’s website at www.gnty.com, or by contacting the Company’s Corporate Secretary.

Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. has an audit committee. The Audit Committee is comprised of Weldon Miller, Gene Watson and Carl Johnson, Jr., each of whom is an independent director of the Company as defined in Rule 4200(a)(15) of The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. listing standards. The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Johnson has the requisite attributes of an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by SEC regulations and that such attributes were acquired through relevant education and experience.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information under the caption “Executive Compensation and Other Matters” in the 2005 Proxy Statement, which will be filed within 120 days after December 31, 2004, is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The information under the caption “Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock by Management of the Company and Principal Shareholders” in the 2005 Proxy Statement, which will be filed within 120 days after December 31, 2004, is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

The information under the caption “Interests of Management and Others in Certain Transactions” in the 2005 Proxy Statement, which will be filed within 120 days after December 31, 2004, is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information under the caption “Principal Accountant Fees and Services” in the 2005 Proxy Statement, which will be filed within 120 days after December 31, 2004, is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedules

Reference is made to the Financial Statements, the reports thereon, the notes thereto and supplementary data commencing at page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Set forth below is a list of such Financial Statements:

	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2004 and 2003
	Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Financial Statement Schedules

All supplemental schedules are omitted as inapplicable or because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto.

Exhibits

Each exhibit marked with an asterisk is filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Exhibit Number		Description


2.1		Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated as of April 23, 1999 between First American Financial Corporation and Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-81881)).

2.2		First Amendment to the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization between First American Financial Corporation and Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-81881)).

2.3		Second Amendment to the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization between First American Financial Corporation and Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-81881)).

3.1		Amended Articles of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-48959) (the “Registration Statement”)).

3.2		Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registration Statement).

4		Specimen form of certificate evidencing the Common Stock (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4 to the Registration Statement).

4.1		Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust – Guaranty (TX) Trust I – Dated as of March 23, 2000 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10 to the Company’s quarterly report Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000 filed on May 15, 2000).

4.2**		Indenture between Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as trustee, dated as of October 30, 2002.

10.1+		Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registration Statement).

10.2		Amended and Restated Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan with 401(k) Provisions dated December 18, 2001 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2001).

21		Subsidiaries of Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 21 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003)

23*		Consent of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP

31.1*		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2*		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


		* Filed herewith

		** This exhibit is not filed herewith because it meets the exclusion set forth in Section 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K and the Company hereby agrees to furnish a copy thereof to the Commission upon request.

		+ Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, Guaranty Bancshares, Inc., has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Mount Pleasant and the State of Texas on March 14, 2005.

	GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.

	By:	/s/ ARTHUR B. SCHARLACH, JR.

		Arthur B. Scharlach, Jr.
		Chairman of the Board & Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report or amendment thereto has been signed by the following persons in the indicated capacities on March 14, 2005.

Signature		Positions

/s/ ARTHUR B. SCHARLACH, JR.

Arthur B. Scharlach, Jr.		Chairman of the Board and Chief
		Executive Officer and Director

/s/ TYSON T. ABSTON

Tyson T. Abston		President and Director

/s/ CLIFTON A. PAYNE

Clifton A. Payne		Senior Vice President, Chief
		Financial Officer and Director
		(principal financial officer and
		principal accounting officer)

/s/ KIRK L. LEE

Kirk L. Lee		Senior Vice President and Director

/s/ JOHNNY CONROY

Johnny Conroy		Director

/s/ JONICE CRANE

Jonice Crane		Director

/s/ C. A. HINTON, SR.

C.A. Hinton, Sr.		Director

/s/ CaRL JOHNSON, JR.

Carl Johnson, Jr.		Director

/s/ WELDON MILLER

Weldon Miller		Director

/s/ BILL PRIEFERT

Bill Priefert		Director

/s/ GENE WATSON

Gene Watson		Director

(This page intentionally left blank)

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

Table of Contents

	Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-2

Consolidated Balance Sheets	F-3

Consolidated Statements of Earnings	F-4

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity	F-5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	F-6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-7

F- 1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Guaranty Bancshares, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with U. S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP

Dallas, Texas
January 21, 2005

F- 2

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2004 and 2003
(Dollars in thousands, except par value)

	2004			2003

Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	14,949		$	20,630
Federal funds sold		9,075			—
Interest-bearing deposits		210			186

Total cash and cash equivalents		24,234			20,816
Interest-bearing time deposits		12,823			6,776
Securities available for sale		103,751			99,614
Loans held for sale		1,749			1,244
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $4,154 and $3,906		371,431			360,364
Premises and equipment, net		13,471			13,183
Other real estate		692			743
Accrued interest receivable		2,794			2,638
Goodwill		2,338			2,338
Cash surrender value of life insurance		5,260			6,152
Other assets		3,423			3,210

	$	541,966		$	517,078

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Liabilities
Deposits
Noninterest-bearing	$	82,302		$	72,202
Interest-bearing		351,441			335,645

Total deposits		433,743			407,847
Accrued interest and other liabilities		4,736			5,071
Federal funds purchased		—			7,295
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		54,553			50,417
Junior subordinated debentures		10,310			—
Long-term debt		—			10,000

Total liabilities		503,342			480,630
Commitments and Contingencies		—			—
Shareholders’ equity
Preferred stock, $5.00 par value, 15,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued		—			—
Common stock, $1.00 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 3,252,016 shares issued		3,252			3,252
Additional paid-in capital		12,882			12,801
Retained earnings		26,405			23,912
Treasury stock, 339,339 and 330,088 shares at cost		(4,179	)		(3,981	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		264			464

Total shareholders’ equity		38,624			36,448

	$	541,966		$	517,078

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F- 3

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

	2004		2003		2002

Interest income
Loans, including fees	$	22,990	$	23,473	$	24,119
Securities
Taxable		3,559		3,919		4,470
Nontaxable		210		58		159
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits		270		114		207

Total interest income		27,029		27,564		28,955
Interest expense
Deposits		6,072		7,240		9,837
FHLB advances and federal funds purchased		2,061		2,001		1,639
Junior subordinated debentures		1,004		—		—
Long-term debt		—		1,001		796

Total interest expense		9,137		10,242		12,272

Net interest income		17,892		17,322		16,683
Provision for loan losses		930		1,075		1,260

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		16,962		16,247		15,423

Noninterest income
Service charges		3,036		2,869		2,957
Net realized gain on securities transactions		120		188		380
Other operating income		1,600		1,880		1,719

Total noninterest income		4,756		4,937		5,056

Noninterest expense
Employee compensation and benefits		9,326		9,371		8,711
Occupancy expenses		2,260		2,019		1,992
Other operating expenses		4,897		4,447		3,989

Total noninterest expense		16,483		15,837		14,692

Earnings before provision for income taxes		5,235		5,347		5,787
Provision for income taxes
Current		1,403		961		1,065
Deferred		172		542		345

Total provision for income taxes		1,575		1,503		1,410

Net Earnings	$	3,660	$	3,844	$	4,377

Basic earnings per common share	$	1.25	$	1.32	$	1.46

Diluted earnings per common share	$	1.24	$	1.30	$	1.45

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F- 4

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

	Preferred Stock		Common Stock		Additional Capital		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income			Treasury Stock			Total Shareholders’ Equity

Balance at January 31, 2002		—		3,250		12,659		17,723			848			(2,653	)		31,827
Comprehensive Income:
Net earnings		—		—		—		4,377			—			—			4,377
Change in net unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of reclassification and tax effects		—		—		—		—			490			—			490

Total comprehensive income		—		—		—		—			—			—			4,867
Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		49		—			—			—			49
Exercise of stock options		—		2		17		—			—			—			19
Purchase of treasury stock		—		—		—		—			—			(1,167	)		(1,167	)
Dividends:
Common - $0.32 per share		—		—		—		(951	)		—			—			(951	)

Balance at December 31, 2002		—		3,252		12,725		21,149			1,338			(3,820	)		34,644
Comprehensive Income:
Net earnings		—		—		—		3,844			—			—			3,844
Change in net unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of reclassification and tax effects		—		—		—		—			(874	)		—			(874	)

Total comprehensive income		—		—		—		—			—			—			2,970
Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		76		—			—			—			76
Purchase of treasury stock		—		—		—		—			—			(161	)		(161	)
Dividends:
Common - $0.37 per share		—		—		—		(1,081	)		—			—			(1,081	)

Balance at December 31, 2003		—		3,252		12,801		23,912			464			(3,981	)		36,448
Comprehensive Income:
Net earnings		—		—		—		3,660			—			—			3,660
Change in net unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of reclassification and tax effects		—		—		—		—			(200	)		—			(200	)

Total comprehensive income		—		—		—		—			—			—			3,460
Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		80		—			—			—			80
Exercise of stock options		—		—		1		—			—			27			28
Purchase of treasury stock		—		—		—		—			—			(225	)		(225	)
Dividends:
Common - $0.40 per share		—		—		—		(1,167	)		—			—			(1,167	)

Balance at December 31, 2004		—		3,252		12,882		26,405			264			(4,179	)		38,624

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F- 5

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)

	2004			2003			2002

Cash flows from operating activities
Net earnings	$	3,660		$	3,844		$	4,377
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		1,316			1,149			1,129
Premium amortization, net of discount accretion		970			1,639			809
Net realized gain on securities transactions		(120	)		(188	)		(380	)
Gain on loans held for sale		(331	)		(586	)		(272	)
Provision for loan losses		930			1,075			1,260
Net change in loans held for sale		(174	)		5,069			(3,821	)
Write-down of other real estate and repossessed assets		78			59			37
Net (gain) loss on sale of premises, equipment and other real estate		(21	)		(32	)		64
Provision for Aircraft Finance Trust impairment		—			60			—
Loss on impairment of investment in Aircraft Finance Trust		120			113			—
Stock-based compensation expense		80			76			49
Net change in accrued interest receivable and other assets		(588	)		(96	)		2,100
Net change in accrued interest payable and other liabilities		(232	)		(91	)		47

Net cash provided by operating activities		5,688			12,091			5,399

Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of interest-bearing time deposits		(6,047	)		(6,776	)		—
Securities available for sale:
Purchases		(36,207	)		(95,857	)		(95,863	)
Proceeds from sales and principal repayments		30,975			100,524			70,962
Net purchases of premises and equipment		(1,437	)		(642	)		(940	)
Net proceeds from sale of premises, equipment and other real estate		771			1,537			3,338
Proceeds from benefits of insurance policies		1,076			—			—
Net increase in loans		(12,774	)		(6,439	)		(35,170	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(23,643	)		(7,653	)		(57,673	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Net change in deposits		25,896			(17,103	)		41,671
Net change in federal funds purchased		(7,295	)		7,295			—
Proceeds from FHLB advances		20,500			13,000			20,000
Repayment of FHLB advances		(16,364	)		(5,346	)		(10,329	)
Proceeds from long-term debt		—			—			3,000
Purchase of treasury stock		(225	)		(161	)		(1,167	)
Exercise of stock options		28			—			19
Cash dividends paid		(1,167	)		(1,081	)		(951	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		21,373			(3,396	)		52,243

Net change in cash and cash equivalents		3,418			1,042			(31	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		20,816			19,774			19,805

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	24,234		$	20,816		$	19,774

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F- 6

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)

NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of the significant accounting policies followed in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. The policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and to general practices within the banking industry.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Guaranty Financial Corp., Inc., which wholly owns Guaranty Bond Bank, formally known as Guaranty Bank (“Bank”). Guaranty Bond Bank has three wholly-owned non-bank subsidiaries, Guaranty Leasing Company, Guaranty Company and GB Com, Inc., and partial interests in two non-bank subsidiaries, BSC Securities, L.C. (“BSC”) and Independent Bank Services, L.C. (“IBS”). All entities combined are collectively referred to as the “Company.” All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Nature of Operations

The Company operates eleven locations in Northeast Texas and one location in Fort Stockton, Texas. The Company’s main sources of income are derived from granting loans primarily in Northeast Texas and investing in securities issued by the U.S. Treasury, U.S. government agencies and state and political subdivisions. A variety of financial products and services are provided to individual and corporate customers. The primary deposit products are checking accounts, money market accounts, and certificates of deposit. The primary lending products are real estate, commercial, and consumer loans. Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio, a substantial portion of its debtors’ abilities to honor contracts is dependent on the economy of the Northeast Texas area.

Use of Estimates

To prepare financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management makes estimates and assumptions based on available information. These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the disclosures provided, and actual future results could differ. The allowance for loan losses, fair values of financial instruments, the status of contingencies, and the value of the Company’s recorded investment in the Aircraft Finance Trust (“AFT”) are particularly subject to change.

Cash Equivalents and Supplemental Cash Flow Information

Cash and cash equivalents include cash, due from banks, interest-bearing deposits with other banks, which have initial maturities less than 90 days and federal funds sold. Net cash flows are reported for loan and deposit transactions, and short-term borrowings with initial maturities less than 90 days.

In 2004, 2003 and 2002, cash paid for interest totaled $9,037, $10,554, and $12,505, respectively, and cash paid for income taxes totaled $2,055, $780, and $1,320, respectively. Significant noncash transactions included transfers from loans to other real estate and repossessed assets of $936, $1,196, and $3,988 in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Securities

Securities are classified as held to maturity and carried at amortized cost when management has the positive intent and ability to hold them to maturity. Securities are classified as available for sale when they might be sold before maturity. Securities available for sale are carried at fair value, with unrealized holding gains and losses reported in other comprehensive income. Management determines the appropriate classification of securities at the time of purchase. Restricted securities such as stock in the Independent Bankers Financial Corporation, the Federal Home Loan Bank and Independent Bankers Capital Fund, L.P. are carried at cost.

F- 7

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)

NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Interest income includes amortization of purchase premiums and discounts. Gains and losses on sales are based on the amortized cost of the security sold. Securities are written down to fair value when a decline in fair value is not temporary.

Loans Held For Sale

Certain residential mortgage loans are originated for sale in the secondary mortgage loan market. These loans are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair market value in the aggregate. Net unrealized losses, if any, are recognized through a valuation allowance by charges to income. To mitigate the interest rate risk, fixed commitments may be obtained at the time loans are originated or identified for sale. All sales are made without recourse. Gains or losses on sales of mortgage loans are recognized at settlement dates based on the difference between the selling price and the carrying value of the related mortgage loans sold.

Loans

Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future, or until maturity or pay-off, are reported at the principal amount outstanding. Interest is calculated using the simple interest method on the daily balance of the principal amount outstanding.

Loans on which the accrual of interest has been discontinued are designated as nonaccrual loans. Accrual of interest on loans is discontinued either when reasonable doubt exists as to the full, timely collection of interest or principal or when a loan becomes contractually past due by ninety days or more with respect to interest or principal, unless such past due loan is well secured and in the process of collection. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, interest previously accrued but not collected is reversed against current period interest income. Interest accruals are resumed on such loans only when they are brought fully current with respect to interest and principal and when, in the judgment of management, the loans are estimated to be fully collectible as to both principal and interest. Loans renegotiated in troubled debt restructuring are those loans on which concessions in terms have been granted because of a borrower’s financial difficulty.

Loan origination fees, prepaid interest and certain direct origination costs are deferred, and the net amount is amortized as an adjustment of the related loan’s yield using a level yield method over the expected lives of the related loans. The amortization of deferred loan fees and costs and the accretion of unearned discounts on non-performing loans is discounted during periods of non-performance.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is a reserve established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense, which represents management’s best estimate of probable losses that have been incurred within the existing portfolio of loans. The allowance, in the judgment of management, is necessary to reserve for estimated loan losses and risks inherent in the loan portfolio. While management utilizes its best judgment and information available, the ultimate adequacy of the allowance is dependent upon a variety of factors, including the performance of the bank’s loan portfolio, the economy, changes in real estate values and interest rates and the view of the regulatory authorities toward loan classifications.

Management estimates the allowance balance required, in part, by evaluating the loan portfolio for problem loans. Potential problem loans are classified and separately monitored by management. Loans internally classified as “special mention” are those that contain a weakness that, if left unattended, could develop into a problem affecting the ultimate collectibility of the loan. Loans internally classified as “substandard” are those loans with clear and defined weaknesses such as highly leveraged positions, unfavorable financial ratios, uncertain repayment sources or poor financial condition, which may jeopardize recoverability of the loan. Loans internally classified as “doubtful” are those loans that have characteristics similar to substandard loans, but also have an increased risk that a loss may occur or at least a portion of the loan may require a charge-off if liquidated at present. Although loans classified as substandard do not duplicate loans classified as doubtful, both substandard and doubtful loans may include some loans that are past due at least 90 days, are on nonaccrual status or have been restructured. Loans internally classified as “loss” are those loans that are in the process of being charged off.

F- 8

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)

NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Loan impairment is reported when full payment under the loan terms is not expected. Loans are evaluated for impairment when payments are delayed, typically 90 days or more, or when analysis of a borrower’s operating results and financial condition indicates the borrower’s underlying cash flows are not adequate to meet debt service requirements and it is probable that not all principal and interest amounts will be collected according to the original terms of the loan. Impairment is evaluated in total for smaller-balance loans of similar nature such as residential mortgage and consumer loans and on an individual loan basis for other loans. If a loan is impaired, a portion of the allowance is allocated so that the loan is reported, net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Impaired loans, or portions thereof, are charged off when deemed uncollectible.

In addition to allocations made for specific classified loans, general reserve allocations are made after consideration of such factors as past loan loss experience, general prevailing economic conditions, the nature, composition and volume of the loan portfolio, and other qualitative factors based on management’s judgment.

While portions of the allowance may be allocated for specific credits, the entire allowance is available for any credit that, in management’s judgment, should be charged-off.

Premises and Equipment

Land is carried at cost. Premises and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Maintenance, repairs and minor improvements are charged to noninterest expense as incurred.

Other Real Estate

Assets acquired through, or in lieu of, foreclosure are initially recorded at fair value when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. If fair value declines, a valuation allowance is recorded through expense. Costs after acquisition are expensed.

Transfers of Financial Assets

Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales, when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1) the assets have been isolated from the Company, (2) the transferee obtains the right (free conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (3) the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.

Goodwill

On January 1, 2002, the Company stopped amortizing goodwill and adopted a new policy for measuring goodwill for impairment. No impairment of goodwill was recognized in connection with the adoption of this new policy. Under the new policy, goodwill is assigned to reporting units. The Company currently operates as a single reporting unit and all of the reported goodwill is associated with the entire Company. Goodwill is then tested for impairment at least annually, or on an interim basis if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more-likely-than-not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value. Goodwill is tested for impairment using a two-step approach. The first step is to compare the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit is greater than its carrying amount, goodwill is not considered impaired and the second step is not required. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the second step of the impairment test measures the amount of the impairment loss, if any. The second step of the impairment test is to compare the implied fair value of goodwill to its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, an impairment loss is recognized equal to that excess.

F- 9

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)

NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

The implied fair value of goodwill is calculated in the same manner that goodwill is calculated in a business combination, whereby the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the purchase price. The excess “purchase price” over the amounts assigned to assets and liabilities would be the implied fair value of goodwill.

Intangible Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets

Intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful life. Intangible assets, premises and equipment and other long-lived assets are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable from future undiscounted cash flows. If impaired, the assets are recorded at fair value.

Income Taxes

Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future tax amounts for the temporary differences between carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the expected amount to be realized.

Stock Compensation

In accordance with accounting standard, SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123,” the Company uses the modified prospective fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation prescribed by the standard. Under the modified prospective method, the Company recognizes stock-based employee compensation expense as if the fair value method had been used to account for all employee awards granted, modified, or settled in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1994. The fair value of options granted is determined using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. Stock-based employee compensation expense totaled approximately $80, $76, and $49 in 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.

F- 10

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)

NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Fair Values of Financial Instruments

Fair values of financial instruments are estimated using relevant market information and other assumptions. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment regarding interest rates, credit risk, prepayments, and other factors, especially in the absence of broad markets for particular items. Changes in assumptions or in market conditions could significantly affect the estimates. The fair value estimates of existing on and off-balance sheet financial instruments do not include the value of anticipated future business or the value of assets and liabilities not considered financial instruments.

Loss Contingencies

Loss contingencies, including claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, are recorded as liabilities when the likelihood of loss is probable and an amount or range of loss can be reasonably estimated.

Dividend Restriction

Banking regulations require the maintenance of certain capital levels that may limit the amount of dividends that may be paid. Regulatory capital requirements are more fully disclosed in a separate note.

Restrictions on Cash

The Company was required to have $793 and $299 of cash on hand or on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank to meet regulatory reserve and clearing requirements at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Deposits with the Federal Reserve Bank do not earn interest.

Earnings Per Common Share

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is based on net earnings divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS includes the dilutive effect of stock options granted using the treasury stock method. The weighted average number of common shares outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per share computations were as follows:

	2004		2003		2002

Weighted average shares outstanding – Basic		2,917,984		2,922,558		2,991,453
Effect of stock options		44,529		30,722		21,253

Weighted average shares outstanding – Diluted		2,962,513		2,953,280		3,012,706

F- 11

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)

NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income is reported for all periods. Comprehensive income includes both net income and other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income components and related taxes were as follows:

	2004			2003			2002

Unrealized (loss) gain on available-for-sale securities arising during the period	$	(183	)	$	(1,135	)	$	1,122
Reclassification adjustment for amounts realized on securities sales included in net earnings		(120	)		(188	)		(380	)

Net unrealized (loss) gain		(303	)		(1,323	)		742
Tax effect		103			449			(252	)

Total other comprehensive (loss) income	$	(200	)	$	(874	)	$	490

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

F- 12

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)

NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year’s presentation.

F- 13

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)

NOTE 2 – SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE

Year-end securities available for sale were as follows:

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value

December 31, 2004:
U. S. government agency securities	$	6,099	$	99	$	39	$	6,159
Mortgage-backed securities		82,761		433		333		82,861
Equity securities		4,100		—		—		4,100
Obligations of state and political subdivisions		10,390		241		—		10,631

	$	103,350	$	773	$	372	$	103,751

December 31, 2003:
U. S. government agency securities	$	7,013	$	190	$	9	$	7,194
Mortgage-backed securities		86,785		776		313		87,248
Equity securities		3,902		—		—		3,902
Obligations of state and political subdivisions		1,210		60		—		1,270

	$	98,910	$	1,026	$	322	$	99,614

Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are backed by pools of mortgages that are insured or guaranteed by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) or the Government National Mortgage Corporation (GNMA). Equity securities include stock holdings in Independent Bankers Financial Corporation, the Federal Home Loan Bank, and Independent Bankers Capital Fund, L.P.

At December 31, 2004, there were no holdings of securities of any one issuer, other than the U.S. government and its agencies, in an amount greater than 10% of shareholders’ equity.

Securities with a fair value of approximately $60,214 and $56,784 at December 31, 2004, and 2003, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits and for other purposes as required or permitted by law.

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities at December 31, 2004, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Equity securities are shown separately since they do not have a maturity date. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers and/or issuers may have the right to call or prepay their obligation with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value

Due within one year	$	120	$	120
Due after one year through five years		10,938		11,109
Due after five years through ten years		30,973		31,165
Due after ten years		57,219		57,257
Equity securities		4,100		4,100

	$	103,350	$	103,751

F- 14

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)

NOTE 2 – SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE (Continued)

Sales of securities available for sale were as follows:

	2004		2003		2002

Proceeds from the sale of securities	$	4,790	$	44,504	$	31,973
Gross realized gains		120		250		427
Gross realized losses		—		62		47

Information pertaining to securities with gross unrealized losses at December 31, 2004 and 2003, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position follows:

	Less Than Twelve Months				Over Twelve Months

	Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value

Securities available for sale:
December 31, 2004:
U. S. government agency securities	$	24	$	1,976	$	15	$	1,986
Mortgage-backed securities		73		23,611		260		22,893
Equity securities		—		—		—		—
Obligations of state and political subdivisions		—		—		—		—

	$	97	$	25,587	$	275	$	24,879

December 31, 2003:
U. S. government agency securities	$	9	$	2,005	$	—	$	—
Mortgage-backed securities		313		32,040		—		—
Equity securities		—		—		—		—
Obligations of state and political subdivisions		—		30		—		—

	$	322	$	34,075	$	—	$	—

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment on at least a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.

At December 31, 2004, the securities available for sale with unrealized losses have depreciated 0.73% from the Company’s amortized cost basis. All of these securities are either guaranteed by the United States Government or secured by mortgage loans. These unrealized losses relate principally to current interest rates for similar types of securities. In analyzing an issuer’s financial condition, management considers whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, and the results of reviews of the issuer’s financial condition. As management has the ability to hold debt securities until maturity, or for the foreseeable future, no declines are deemed to be other-than-temporary.

F- 15

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)

NOTE 3 – LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

Year-end loans, excluding loans held for sale, were as follows:

	2004		2003

Commercial	$	61,602	$	55,285
Agriculture		10,963		10,173
Real estate:
Construction and land development		31,917		22,020
1-4 family residential		145,886		136,717
Farmland		16,178		20,267
Commercial		75,183		79,953
Multi-family residential		5,052		9,291
Consumer		28,833		30,612

Total gross loans		375,614		364,318
Less:
Unearned discounts		29		48
Allowance for loan losses		4,154		3,906

Total net loans	$	371,431	$	360,364

Loans to executive officers, directors, principal shareholders and their affiliates were as follows:

Beginning balance	$	17,487		$	13,441
New loans		14,741			10,051
Repayments		(9,563	)		(6,005	)

Ending balance	$	22,665		$	17,487

Changes in the allowance for loan losses were as follows:

	2004			2003			2002

Beginning balance	$	3,906		$	3,692		$	3,346
Provision		930			1,075			1,260
Charge-offs		(807	)		(923	)		(1,072	)
Recoveries		125			62			158

Ending balance	$	4,154		$	3,906		$	3,692

Impaired loans were as follows:

	2004		2003

Year-end loans with allowance allocated	$	3,011	$	2,072
Year-end loans with no allowance allocated		—		—

Impaired loans		3,011		2,072

Amount of the allowance allocated	$	725	$	740

F- 16

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)

NOTE 3 – LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (Continued)

The average balance of impaired loans was $2,693 in 2004, $2,674 in 2003 and $3,265 in 2002. No interest income was recognized on these impaired loans during 2004, 2003 or 2002. There were no commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers whose loans were classified as impaired.

The following table presents information regarding nonperforming assets at the dates indicated:

	December 31,

	2004			2003

Nonaccrual loans	$	3,011		$	2,072
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more		565			489
Other real estate		692			743

Total nonperforming assets	$	4,268		$	3,304

Nonperforming assets to total gross loans and other real estate		1.13	%		0.90	%

If interest on nonaccrual loans had been accrued, such income would have been approximately $353 in 2004, $214 in 2003 and $310 in 2002.

NOTE 4 - PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT

Year-end premises and equipment were as follows:

	2004		2003

Land	$	3,132	$	2,604
Building and improvements		12,916		12,928
Furniture, fixtures and equipment		5,059		5,136
Automobiles		166		108

		21,273		20,776
Less accumulated depreciation		7,802		7,593

	$	13,471	$	13,183

Depreciation expense totaled $1,149 in 2004, $1,024 in 2003 and $992 in 2002.

F- 17

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)

NOTE 5 - INTEREST-BEARING DEPOSITS

Year-end interest-bearing deposits were as follows:

	2004		2003

NOW accounts	$	50,051	$	44,400
Savings and money market accounts		84,060		75,335
Time deposits less than $100,000		125,031		119,670
Time deposits $100,000 and over		92,299		96,240

	$	351,441	$	335,645

Year-end scheduled maturities of time deposits were as follows:

	2004

2005	$	162,199
2006		22,931
2007		10,912
2008		9,421
2009		11,737
Thereafter		130

	$	217,330

Deposits of executive officers, directors and significant shareholders totaled $10,158 and $11,466 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

F- 18

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)

NOTE 6 – FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK ADVANCES

Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances were as follows:

	Current Weighted Average Rate			2004		2003

Fixed-rate advances, with monthly interest payments, principal due in:
2004		—		$	—	$	6,000
2005		2.63	%		16,000		7,000
2006		4.39	%		22,500		21,000
2007		3.60	%		7,000		7,000
2008		3.32	%		7,000		7,000
2009		—			—		—

				$	52,500	$	48,000

Fixed-rate advances, with monthly principal and interest payments, principal due in:
2004		—		$	—	$	364
2005		5.23	%		742		742
2006		5.19	%		292		292
2007		5.19	%		307		307
2008		5.19	%		302		302
2009		5.18	%		77		77
Thereafter		5.18	%		333		333

					2,053		2,417

				$	54,553	$	50,417

The maximum month-end balance of FHLB advances outstanding was $58,146 and $53,064 in 2004 and 2003, respectively. Average balances of borrowings outstanding during 2004 and 2003 were $53,227 and $50,511, respectively. As a member of the FHLB system, the Bank has the ability to obtain borrowings up to a maximum total of $109,515 subject to the level of qualified, pledgable 1-4 Family loans, Multi-family loans, small business loans, small farm loans, and FHLB stock owned. The advances are collateralized by a blanket pledge of the Bank’s 1-4 Family loans, Multi-family loans, small business loans, small farm loans, and FHLB stock owned. The weighted-average interest rates on these borrowings were 3.64% and 3.91% at December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.

F- 19

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)

NOTE 7 – JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES

In March 2000, the Company formed Guaranty (TX) Capital Trust I (“Trust I”) and on March 23, 2000, Trust I issued $7,000 (seven thousand shares with a liquidation amount of one thousand dollars per security) of 10.875% Fixed Rate Capital Trust Pass-through Securities (“TruPS I”) to a third party in a private placement. Concurrent with the issuance of the TruPS I, Trust I issued common securities to the Company in the aggregate liquidation value of $217. Trust I invested the total proceeds from the sale of the TruPS I and the common securities in $7,217 of the Company’s 10.875% Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures (the “Debentures I”). The Debentures I will mature on March 8, 2030, which date may be shortened to a date not earlier than March 8, 2010, if certain conditions are met (including the Company having received prior approval of the Federal Reserve and any other required regulatory approvals). The net proceeds from the sale of the Debentures I were used to repurchase shares of the Company’s stock, provide a $1,500 additional capital contribution to the Bank and provide for additional working capital to support growth.

If Redeemed During 12 Months Beginning March 8,	Percentage of Principal Amount	If Redeemed During 12 Months Beginning March 8,	Percentage of Principal Amount

2010	105.438%	2016	102.175%
2011	104.894%	2017	101.631%
2012	104.350%	2018	101.088%
2013	103.806%	2019	100.544%
2014	103.263%	2020 and after	100.000%
2015	102.719%

In October 2002, the Company formed Guaranty (TX) Capital Trust II (“Trust II” and together with Trust I, the “Trusts”) and on October 30, 2002, Trust II issued $3,000 (three thousand shares with a liquidation amount of one thousand per security) of Capital Trust Pass-through Securities (“TruPS II”) to a third party in a private placement. Concurrent with the issuance of the TruPS II, Trust II issued common securities to the Company in the aggregate liquidation value of $93. Trust II invested the total proceeds from the sale of the TruPS II and the common securities in $3,093 of the Company’s Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures (the “Debentures II”). The Debentures II will mature on October 30, 2032, which date may be shortened to a date not earlier than October 30, 2012, if certain conditions are met (including the Company having received prior approval of the Federal Reserve and any other required regulatory approvals). The net proceeds from the sale of the Debentures II were used to repurchase shares of the Company’s stock and provide for additional working capital to support growth.

F- 20

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)

NOTE 7 – JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES (Continued)

The securities held by the Trusts qualify as Tier I capital for the Company under Federal Reserve Board guidelines. In May 2004, the Federal Reserve issued proposed rules for the capital treatment of junior subordinated debentures. The proposed rules would limit the aggregate amount of junior subordinated debentures and certain other capital elements to 25% of core capital, net of goodwill. Because the Company’s aggregate amount of junior subordinated debentures is below the limit of 25% of Tier I capital, net of goodwill, the proposal has no effect on the amount of junior subordinated debentures that the Company can include in Tier I capital. Additionally, the rules provide that junior subordinated debentures no longer qualify for Tier I capital within five years of their maturity.

F- 21

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)

NOTE 8 - COMMON STOCK

A summary of issued and outstanding shares of common stock is as follows:

	Common Stock Issued		Treasury Stock			Common Stock Outstanding

Balance at December 31, 2001		3,250,016		(245,588	)		3,004,428
Purchase of treasury stock		—		(74,500	)		(74,500	)
Exercise of stock options		2,000		—			2,000

Balance at December 31, 2002		3,252,016		(320,088	)		2,931,928
Purchase of treasury stock		—		(10,000	)		(10,000	)

Balance at December 31, 2003		3,252,016		(330,088	)		2,921,928
Purchase of treasury stock		—		(11,451	)		(11,451	)
Exercise of stock options		—		2,200			2,200

Balance at December 31, 2004		3,252,016		(339,339	)		2,912,677

NOTE 9 – STOCK OPTIONS

In 1998, the Company’s Board of Directors, with the approval of shareholders, adopted the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan. Under the provisions of this plan, 1,000,000 shares have been reserved for issuance. The plan provides for the grant of nonqualified stock options to certain officers of the Company at exercise prices equal to the fair market value per share of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant. Options granted under the plan generally expire after eight years and generally vest and become exercisable in five equal annual installments commencing on the first anniversary of the date of grant and annually thereafter.

F- 22

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

NOTE 9 – STOCK OPTIONS (Continued)

A summary of activity in the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan follows:

	Shares Available for Future Grants			Options Outstanding

				Number of Shares			Weighted-Average Exercise Price

Balance, December 31, 2001		910,500			89,500		$	9.30
Granted		(20,000	)		20,000			12.50
Exercised		—			(2,000	)		9.30
Canceled		3,000			(3,000	)		9.30

Balance, December 31, 2002		893,500			104,500			9.91
Granted		(40,000	)		40,000			15.36
Exercised		—			—			—
Canceled		—			—			—

Balance, December 31, 2003		853,500			144,500			11.42
Granted		(5,000	)		5,000			20.40
Exercised		—			(2,200	)		12.75
Canceled		6,000			(6,000	)		14.72

Balance, December 31, 2004		854,500			141,300		$	11.58

Other information regarding options outstanding and options exercisable as of December 31, 2004 is as follows:

Exercise Price		Options Outstanding		Options Exercisable		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life in Years

$	9.30		84,500		67,600		3.3
	12.50		15,000		6,000		5.2
	15.23		36,800		7,200		6.3
	19.50		3,000		—		7.6
	21.75		2,000		—		7.8

	Total		141,300		80,800		4.4

F- 23

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

NOTE 9 – STOCK OPTIONS (Continued)

In accordance with accounting standard, SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123,” the Company transitioned to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation during 2002 using the modified prospective method prescribed by the standard. Under the modified prospective method, the Company began recognizing stock-based employee compensation expense from the beginning of 2002 as if the fair value method had been used to account for all employee awards granted, modified, or settled in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1994. The fair value of options granted is determined using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. Stock-based employee compensation expense totaled approximately $80, $76 and $49 in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

The weighted average fair value of options granted in 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $4.87, $4.22 and $4.09 per option, respectively. Fair values of options are estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for 2004, 2003 and 2002: risk-free interest rates of 4.50%, 3.20% and 5.00%; market price volatility factors of 10.6%, 26.0% and 28.7%; a weighted average expected life of the options of 8 years; and dividend yields of 1.60%, 1.97% and 2.24%.

NOTE 10 – EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

The Company maintains an Employee Stock Ownership Plan containing Section 401(k) provisions covering substantially all employees. The 401(k) plan provides for a matching contribution of up to 4% of a participant’s qualified compensation. Total contributions accrued or paid for 2004, 2003 and 2002 totaled $368, $410 and $462, respectively.

The Company maintains a non-qualified, non-contributory “Supplemental Retirement Plan.” The plan covers a retired executive officer to provide benefits equal to amounts payable under the Company’s retirement plan and certain social security benefits to aggregate a predetermined percentage of the officer’s final five-year average salary. The plan is non-funded. Amounts accrued or paid for 2004, 2003 and 2002 totaled $7, $9 and $11, respectively.

The Company established a non-qualified, non-contributory, “Salary Continuation Plan” in 1998. The plan covers an executive officer to provide benefits equal to an amount which represents approximately 75% of projected compensation at retirement as adjusted for amounts payable under the Company’s retirement plan and certain social security benefits. This plan is non-funded. Amounts accrued for 2004, 2003 and 2002 totaled $97, $127 and $116, respectively.

During 1998 the Company established a non-qualified, non-contributory, “Executive Incentive Retirement Plan.” The plan covers a selected group of key personnel to provide benefits equal to amounts computed under an “award criteria” at various targeted salary levels as adjusted for annual earnings performance of the Company. Amounts accrued for 2004, 2003 and 2002 totaled $68, $51 and $50, respectively.

The Company has a bonus plan that provides guidelines whereby officers and employees can earn bonus compensation based on the profitability of the Company. The bonus amounts are determined based on the Company’s achievement of certain percentages of return on equity targets. This plan is approved and adopted annually by the Board of Directors of the Company. The bonus pool under this plan for 2004, 2003 and 2002 totaled $472, $667 and $874, respectively.

F- 24

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)

NOTE 11 - INCOME TAXES

The sources of year-end gross deferred income tax assets and liabilities were as follows:

	2004			2003

Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for loan losses	$	1,230		$	1,094
Deferred Compensation		338			291
Other	$	96		$	43

Total deferred tax asset	$	1,664		$	1,428

Deferred tax liabilities:
Security basis	$	(135	)	$	(116	)
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities		(136	)		(239	)
Depreciation		(1,197	)		(1,291	)
Leasing transactions		(1,864	)		(1,714	)
Deferred loan costs, net		(396	)		(398	)
Other		(60	)		(69	)

Total deferred tax liability	$	(3,788	)	$	(3,827	)

Net deferred tax liability	$	2,124		$	2,399

A reconciliation of the Company’s effective income tax rate and the statutory federal income tax rate for each reported period is as follows:

	2004			2003			2002

Statutory federal income tax rate		35.00	%		35.00	%		35.00	%
Tax exempt income		(2.06	)		(0.37	)		(2.76	)
Accretion of cash surrender value of life insurance		(1.32	)		(6.68	)		(7.40	)
Contribution of property		(1.34	)		—			—
Other, net		(0.20	)		0.16			(0.47	)

Effective income tax rate		30.08	%		28.11	%		24.37	%

Guaranty Leasing Company is a substantial partner in various complex equipment leasing transactions primarily originated in 1992, 1994 and 1995 involving leveraged leases. In November 1998, Guaranty Leasing was informed by the Internal Revenue Service (the “Service”) that it has taken the position that certain losses taken by the “1992 Partnership” during 1994, 1995 and 1996 of $302, $410, and $447, respectively, would be disallowed. In October 2001, Guaranty Leasing was informed by the Service that it has taken the position that certain losses taken by that Partnership during 1997 of $487, would also be disallowed. In September 2002, the Company received from the Service a Notice of Final Partnership Administrative Adjustment disallowing these deductions. Based upon the advice of counsel, the Company believes that it has correctly reported these transactions for tax purposes and that it has obtained appropriate legal, accounting and appraisal opinions and authority to support its positions. The Company recorded and expensed the tax affect of the disallowed deductions in 2002.

F- 25

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)

NOTE 11 - INCOME TAXES (Continued)

In March 2004, the Company was informed by the Service that it had taken the position that certain losses taken by the “1994 Partnership” during the tax years of 1994 through 1999 would be disallowed and tax owed totaling $439, would be assessed. As of December 31, 2004, the Company has not received a Notice of Final Partnership Administrative Adjustment on this Partnership. Based upon the advice of counsel, the Company believes that it has correctly reported these transactions for tax purposes and that it has obtained appropriate legal, accounting and appraisal opinions and authority to support its positions.

In addition to the ongoing litigation regarding the Partnerships, the Service is currently in the process of examining the tax deductions taken for the “1995 Partnership”. No determination has been made regarding the disallowance of similar deductions taken by this Partnership. Should the Service ultimately disallow the related tax deductions taken during the remaining years of the “1992 Partnership” as well as the other two Partnerships, the Company will be required to recognize an additional maximum tax liability of approximately $3,900 plus possible penalty and interest. The Company is actively contesting the position of the Service in connection with this matter, and has taken and will continue to take, appropriate steps necessary to protect its legal position. Any final determination with respect to the Partnerships will be binding on the Company.

F- 26

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)

NOTE 12 – NONINTEREST INCOME AND NONINTEREST EXPENSE

Other operating income consisted of the following:

	Years Ended December 31,

	2004			2003			2002

Fee income	$	974		$	925		$	863
Fiduciary income		252			178			163
Earnings from key-man life insurance		203			251			236
Gain on sale of loans, net		331			586			272
(Loss) gain on sale of assets, net		(143	)		—			97
Gain on sale of other real estate, net		21			32			12
(Loss) from investment in AFT		—			(60	)		—
Impairment of investment in AFT		(120	)		(113	)		—
Other noninterest income		82			81			76

	$	1,600		$	1,880		$	1,719

During 2000, Guaranty Leasing acquired a 2.5% ownership interest in AFT for approximately $2,800. The AFT ownership interest is classified as an Other Asset on the Company’s balance sheet. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the book value of the AFT ownership interest was $1,284 and $1,404, respectively.

During the second quarter 2003, based on limited marketability of the AFT investment, the uncertainty surrounding the airline industry and general economic conditions, management of the Company believed the value of its investment had been impaired, and recorded an impairment charge of $113. In addition to the impairment charge, management recorded a loss of $60 in 2003. During 2004, an impairment charge of $120 was recorded.

Other operating expense consisted of the following:

	Years Ended December 31,

	2004		2003		2002

Legal and professional fees	$	1,156	$	1,168	$	933
Director and committee fees		507		560		534
Advertising		436		284		310
ATM and debit card expense		437		363		317
Office and computer supplies		299		301		265
Postage		198		211		187
Phone expense		267		252		194
Other		1,597		1,308		1,249

	$	4,897	$	4,447	$	3,989

F- 27

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)

NOTE 13 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

In the normal course of business, the Company enters into various transactions, which, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, are not included in the consolidated balance sheets. These transactions are referred to as “off-balance sheet commitments.” The Company enters into these transactions to meet the financing needs of its customers. These transactions include commitments to extend credit and letters of credit, which involve elements of credit risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company minimizes its exposure to loss under these commitments by subjecting them to credit approval and monitoring procedures.

Letters of credit are written conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The Company’s policies generally require that letters of credit arrangements contain security and debt covenants similar to those contained in loan agreements. In the event the customer does not perform in accordance with the terms of the agreement with the third party, the Company would be required to fund the commitment. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make is represented by the contractual amount shown in the table below. If the commitment were funded, the Company would be entitled to seek recovery from the customer. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, no amounts have been recorded as liabilities for the Bank’s potential obligations under these guarantees.

Commitments and letters of credit outstanding at year-end were as follows:

	Contract or Notional Amount

	2004		2003

Commitments to extend credit	$	29,166	$	23,878
Letters of credit		1,416		1,491

The Company is involved in certain claims and lawsuits occurring in the normal course of business. Management, after consultation with legal counsel, does not believe that the outcome of these actions, if determined adversely, would have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements of the Company. See “NOTE 11-Income Taxes” for further discussion.

NOTE 14 – CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK

Most of the Company’s business activity is with customers located within the state. Investments in state and municipal securities involve governmental entities within the Company’s market area. The Company also maintains deposits with other financial institutions in amounts that exceed FDIC insurance coverage. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents.

F- 28

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)

NOTE 15 - REGULATORY MATTERS

Banks and bank holding companies are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by state and federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy guidelines and, additionally for banks, prompt corrective action regulations involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators about components, risk weighting, and other factors. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate regulatory action. Management believes, as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, that the Company and the Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

The following table sets forth the consolidated and bank only actual capital levels in addition to the requirements under prompt corrective action regulations.

	Actual					Minimum Required For Capital Adequacy Purposes					To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions

	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio

December 31, 2004
Total capital to risk-weighted assets:
Consolidated	$	50,176		13.65	%	$	29,401		8.00	%				n/a
Bank		44,897		12.25	%		29,327		8.00	%	$	36,659		10.00	%
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets:
Consolidated		46,022		12.52	%		14,701		4.00	%				n/a
Bank		40,743		11.11	%		14,664		4.00	%		21,996		6.00	%
Tier 1 capital to average assets:
Consolidated		46,022		8.73	%		21,081		4.00	%				n/a
Bank		40,743		7.74	%		21,045		4.00	%		26,306		5.00	%
December 31, 2003
Total capital to risk-weighted assets:
Consolidated	$	47,552		13.18	%	$	28,859		8.00	%				n/a
Bank		46,057		12.81	%		28,767		8.00	%	$	35,958		10.00	%
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets:
Consolidated		43,646		12.10	%		14,429		4.00	%				n/a
Bank		42,151		11.72	%		14,383		4.00	%		21,575		6.00	%
Tier 1 capital to average assets:
Consolidated		43,646		8.32	%		20,987		4.00	%				n/a
Bank		42,151		8.05	%		20,943		4.00	%		26,179		5.00	%

As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Bank met the level of capital required to be categorized as well capitalized under prompt corrective action regulations. In May 2004, the Federal Reserve released proposed rules for the capital treatment of junior subordinated debentures. The proposed rules would limit the aggregate amount of junior subordinated debentures and certain other capital elements to 25% of core capital, net of goodwill. Because the Company’s aggregate amount of junior subordinated debentures is below the limit of 25% of Tier I capital, net of goodwill, the proposal has no effect on the amount of junior subordinated debentures that the Company can include in Tier I capital. Additionally, the rules provide that junior subordinated debentures no longer qualify for Tier I capital within five years of their maturity. See “NOTE 7-Junior Subordinated Debentures” for further discussion.

The Bank is a state-charted banking association whose deposits are insured by the FDIC and therefore is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the Texas Department of Banking and the FDIC. Because the Federal Reserve regulates the bank holding company parent of the Bank, the Federal Reserve also has supervisory authority that directly affects the Bank. In addition, upon making certain determinations with respect to the condition of any insured bank, such as the Bank, the FDIC may begin proceedings to terminate a bank’s federal deposit insurance.

F- 29

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)

NOTE 15 - REGULATORY MATTERS (Continued)

Dividends paid by the Company are mainly provided by dividends from its subsidiaries. However, certain restrictions exist regarding the ability of its bank subsidiary to transfer funds to the Company in the form of cash dividends, loans or advances. These guidelines do not currently restrict the Bank from paying normal dividends to the Company.

NOTE 16 - FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The estimated fair value approximates carrying value for financial instruments except those described below:

	Securities: Fair values for securities are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar instruments.

	Loans: The fair value of fixed-rate loans and variable-rate loans which reprice on an infrequent basis is estimated by discounting future cash flows using the current interest rates at which similar loans with similar terms would be made to borrowers of similar credit quality.

	Deposits: The fair value of deposit liabilities with defined maturities and long-term debt is estimated by discounting future cash flows using the interest rates currently offered for deposits or similar borrowings of similar remaining maturities.

	FHLB Advances, Junior Subordinated Debentures and Long-Term Debt: The fair value of borrowings is estimated by discounting future cash flows using currently available rates for similar financing.

	Off-Balance Sheet Instruments: The fair values of these items are not material and are therefore not included on the following schedule.

The estimated year-end fair values of financial instruments are detailed in the following table. The fair value of financial instruments is defined as the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale.

	2004				2003

	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value

Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	24,234	$	24,234	$	20,816	$	20,816
Time deposits		12,823		12,849		6,776		6,801
Securities available for sale		103,751		103,751		99,614		99,614
Loans held for sale		1,749		1,749		1,244		1,244
Loans, net		371,431		361,876		360,364		359,921
Accrued interest receivable		2,794		2,794		2,638		2,638
Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	433,743	$	415,004	$	407,847	$	403,407
Federal funds purchased		—		—		7,295		7,295
FHLB advances		54,553		54,908		50,417		51,932
Junior subordinated debentures		10,310		14,396		—		—
Long-term debt		—		—		10,000		12,181
Accrued interest payable		1,073		1,073		828		828

F- 30

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)

NOTE 16 - FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (Continued)

While these estimates of fair value are based on management’s judgment of appropriate factors, there is no assurance that, were the Company to have disposed of such items at December 31, 2004 and 2003, the estimated fair values would necessarily have been achieved at those dates, since market values may differ depending on various circumstances. The estimated fair values at December 31, 2004 and 2003 should not necessarily be considered to apply at subsequent dates.

In addition, other assets, such as property and equipment, and liabilities of the Company that are not defined as financial instruments are not included in the above disclosures. Also, nonfinancial instruments typically not recognized in financial statements nevertheless may have value but are not included in the above disclosures. These include, among other items, the estimated earning power of core deposit accounts, the trained work force, customer goodwill and similar items.

NOTE 17 – PARENT COMPANY ONLY CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Condensed financial information of the Company is as follows:

Condensed Balance Sheets
December 31, 2004 and 2003

	2004		2003

Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	4,962	$	1,260
Investment in subsidiaries		43,348		45,266
Cash surrender value of life insurance		47		954
Premises and equipment, net		—		14
Other assets		877		187

	$	49,234	$	47,681

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Other liabilities		300		923
Junior subordinated debentures		10,310		—
Long-term debt		—		10,310
Shareholders’ equity		38,624		36,448

	$	49,234	$	47,681

F- 31

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)

NOTE 17 – PARENT COMPANY ONLY CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Condensed Statements of Earnings
Years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

	2004			2003			2002

Operating income
Dividends from subsidiaries	$	6,300		$	1,200		$	2,100
Other income		12

Total operating income		6,312		$	1,200		$	2,100
Costs and expenses
Interest expense		1,004			1,001			796
General and administrative		381			440			369

Total costs and expenses		1,385			1,441			1,165

Earnings before income tax		4,927			(241	)		935
Provision for income taxes		(141	)		(153	)		—

Earnings before equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries		5,068			(88	)		935
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries		(1,408	)		3,932			3,442

Net earnings	$	3,660		$	3,844		$	4,377

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
Years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

	2004			2003			2002

Cash flows from operating activities
Net earnings	$	3,660		$	3,844		$	4,377
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash from operating activities:
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries		1,408			(3,932	)		(3,442	)
Depreciation and amortization		14			9			9
Net change in other assets		(388	)		(42	)		(129	)
Net change in other liabilities		(623	)		303			138
Stock-based compensation expense		80			76			49

Net cash provided by operating activities		4,151			258			1,002
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of premises and equipment		—			—			(29	)
Proceeds from insurance benefits		915			—			—

Net cash used in investing activities		915			—			(29	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Purchase of treasury stock		(225	)		(161	)		(1,167	)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		—			—			3,000
Exercise of stock options		28			—			19
Cash dividends paid		(1,167	)		(1,081	)		(951	)

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(1,364	)		(1,242	)		901

Net change in cash and cash equivalents		3,702			(984	)		1,874
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		1,260			2,244			370

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	4,962		$	1,260		$	2,244

F- 32

GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

NOTE 18 - QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA - UNAUDITED

Condensed quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 were as follows:

	QUARTER ENDED 2004

	(unaudited )
	Dec. 31		Sept. 30		June 30		March 31

Interest income	$	7,030	$	6,787	$	6,512	$	6,700
Interest expense		2,509		2,307		2,171		2,150

Net interest income		4,521		4,480		4,341		4,550
Provision for loan losses		250		200		230		250

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		4,271		4,280		4,111		4,300
Noninterest income		1,000		1,392		1,235		1,228
Noninterest expense		4,106		4,272		4,090		4,114

Earnings before taxes		1,165		1,400		1,256		1,414
Provision for income tax expense		316		462		415		382

Net earnings	$	849	$	938	$	841	$	1,032

Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.29	$	0.32	$	0.29	$	0.35
Diluted	$	0.29	$	0.32	$	0.28	$	0.35

	QUARTER ENDED 2003

	(unaudited )
	Dec. 31		Sept. 30		June 30		March 31

Interest income	$	6,799	$	6,722	$	7,001	$	7,042
Interest expense		2,229		2,413		2,771		2,829

Net interest income		4,570		4,309		4,230		4,213
Provision for loan losses		300		250		150		375

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		4,270		4,059		4,080		3,838
Noninterest income		1,155		1,209		1,187		1,386
Noninterest expense		3,918		3,963		4,004		3,952

Earnings before taxes		1,507		1,305		1,263		1,272
Provision for income tax expense		418		370		478		237

Net earnings	$	1,089	$	935	$	785	$	1,035

Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.37	$	0.32	$	0.27	$	0.36
Diluted	$	0.37	$	0.31	$	0.27	$	0.35

F- 33