e6vk
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 6-K
REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the month of March 2006
Bayer Aktiengesellschaft
Bayer Corporation*
(Translation of registrants name into English)
Bayerwerk, Gebaeude W11
Kaiser-Wilhelm-Allee
51368 Leverkusen
Germany
(Address of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of
Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F X Form 40-F
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101 (b)(1): N/A
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101 (b)(7): N/A
Indicate by check mark whether, by furnishing the information contained in this form, the
registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes No X
If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection
with Rule 12g3-2(b): N/A
|
|
|
* |
|
Bayer Corporation is also the name of a wholly-owned subsidiary of the registrant in the United
States. |
|
|
|
|
|
Science For A Better
Life Annual Report 2005 |
|
|
Financial Calendar
|
|
2005 Annual Report
Monday, March 6, 2006 |
Q2 2006 Interim Report
Tuesday, August 1, 2006 |
Q1 2006 Interim Report
Thursday, April 27, 2006 |
Q3 2006 Interim Report
Tuesday, October 31, 2006 |
Annual Stockholders Meeting 2006
Friday, April 28, 2006 |
Annual Stockholders Meeting 2007
Friday, April 27, 2007 |
Payment of Dividend
Tuesday, May 2, 2006 |
Payment of Dividend
Monday, April 30, 2007 |
Operations Overview
Strategic management in the Bayer Group is kept
separate from everyday business activities. The
subgroups and service companies operate independently
under the leadership of the management holding company
Bayer AG, which defines common values, goals and
strategies for the entire enterprise and is headed by
the four-member Group Management Board. The Corporate
Center supports the Group Management Board in its tasks
and also performs certain common functions for the
subgroups.
Bayer HealthCare
Bayer HealthCare plays a major role in improving
the health of people and animals by researching,
developing, manufacturing and marketing innovative
products for disease prevention, diagnosis and
treatment. Following the merger of the Biological
Products and Pharmaceuticals divisions to form a new
organizational unit effective January 1, 2006, the
activities of Bayer HealthCare are now organized in
five divisions: Animal Health, Consumer Care, Diabetes
Care, Diagnostics and Pharmaceuticals. The companys
Animal Health and Consumer Care divisions and its
diagnostic systems hold leading positions on the world
market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer HealthCare |
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Net external sales |
|
|
8,058 |
|
|
|
9,429 |
|
|
|
+ 17.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
result [EBIT] |
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
1,102 |
|
|
|
+ 15.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cash flow |
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
+ 20.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow |
|
|
1,053 |
|
|
|
1,351 |
|
|
|
+ 28.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
+ 9.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Result [EBIT] 2005
million
Bayer CropScience
Bayer CropScience is a global leader in crop
protection and non-agricultural pest control. This
company, with its highly effective products,
pioneering innovations and keen customer focus, is
aiming for further growth in the future. It is
organized in three business groups Crop Protection,
Environmental Science and BioScience. Bayer
CropScience markets a balanced range of crop
protection products and is among the leading suppliers
of insecticides, fungicides, herbicides and seed
treatments. It has a strong presence in all regions of
the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer CropScience |
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Net external sales |
|
|
5,946 |
|
|
|
5,896 |
|
|
|
- 0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating result [EBIT] |
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
+ 40.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cash flow |
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
+ 8.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow |
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
904 |
|
|
|
+ 16.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
- 3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Result [EBIT] 2005
million
Bayer MaterialScience
Bayer MaterialScience is a renowned supplier
of high-performance materials and innovative system
solutions used in a wide range of products for everyday
life. Products with leading positions on the world
market account for a major share of sales. Principal
customers are the automotive and construction
industries, the electrical/electronics sector and
manufacturers of sports and leisure articles, packaging
and medical equipment. Operations comprise five
business units: Coatings, Adhesives and Sealants;
Polycarbonates; Polyurethanes; Thermoplastic
Polyurethanes and Inorganic Basic Chemicals, along with
two independent companies, H.C. Starck and Wolff
Walsrode.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer MaterialScience |
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Net external sales |
|
|
8,597 |
|
|
|
10,695 |
|
|
|
+ 24.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating result [EBIT] |
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
1,369 |
|
|
|
+ 113.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cash flow |
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
1,402 |
|
|
|
+ 58.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow |
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
+ 178.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
+ 115.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Result [EBIT] 2005
million
Bayer Business Services
Bayer Business Services is the Bayer Groups
international competence center for IT-based services.
The companys objective is to contribute lastingly to
its customers value creation with high-performance
solutions and new ideas. Its product offering is
focused on four core areas: IT and telecommunications;
procurement and logistics; human resources and
executive personnel services; and finance and
accounting. The service spectrum ranges from
consultancy through the development and implementation
of system solutions to the handling of entire business
processes. For industry and public-sector customers,
Bayer Business Services positions itself as a business
process outsourcing partner; for Bayer, as a shared
service center.
Bayer Technology Services
Bayer Technology Services, the technological
backbone of the Bayer Group, is engaged in process
development and in process and plant engineering,
construction and optimization. This company also
develops innovative technology platforms that
contribute substantially to the efficiency of Bayers
operating units. Bayer Technology Services offers
integrated solutions throughout the life cycle of
facilities, processes and products.
Bayer Industry Services
Bayer Industry Services is the operator of
Germanys largest chemical park, with sites at
Leverkusen, Dormagen and Krefeld-Uerdingen. The company
provides the foundation for the smooth operation of
facilities at these sites, offering a customized
service portfolio ranging from technology through
environmental protection, waste management, utility
supply, analytics, infrastructure, safety and security
to vocational training and continuing education
courses. Bayer Industry Services also markets fully
developed land and buildings to companies interested in
setting up operations within the chemical park.
Working to Create Value through Innovation and Growth
Bayer is a global enterprise with core competencies in the fields of health care,
nutrition and high-tech materials. Our products and services are designed to benefit people
and improve their quality of life. At the same time we want to create value through
innovation, growth and improved earning power.
We have successfully reorganized the Bayer
Group and further streamlined our portfolio
to create a new Bayer that is focused on its
corporate strengths, its customers and the
markets of the future. To help us achieve
this goal, we carried out a strategic
realignment that concentrates our activities
in three high-potential, agile subgroups with
largely independent operations: HealthCare,
CropScience and MaterialScience, supported by
three service companies. Our operating
companies give us the access we need to the
growth markets of the future.
As an inventor company, we plan to continue
setting trends in research-intensive areas.
Innovation is the foundation for
competitiveness and growth, and thus for our
companys success in the future.
We believe our technical and commercial
expertise entails a duty to contribute to
sustainable development a principle we
wholeheartedly endorse, mindful of its
social, ethical and environmental elements.
In awareness of our responsibilities as a
corporate citizen, we define economy, ecology
and social commitment as objectives of equal
rank.
We seek to retain societys confidence
through performance, flexibility and open
communication as we work in pursuit of our
overriding corporate goals: to steadily
create corporate value and generate high
value-added for the benefit of our
stockholders, our employees and the community in every country
in which we operate.
|
|
|
|
|
Science For A Better Life |
2 Contents
Bayer: Science For A Better Life
Products
and services that benefit people and improve the quality of their lives
thats what the slogan Bayer: Science For A Better Life stands for. The examples from the
HealthCare, CropScience and MaterialScience subgroups presented in this Annual Report
illustrate the true meaning of this slogan. The articles feature testimony both from our
customers and from our own research and development experts. As you browse through these
pages, youll also learn more about Bayers innovative products and research activities. Three
examples of customer focus and innovation. Three products representing countless others. Three
solutions from the inventor company Bayer.
BAYER HEALTHCARE Aspirin, long hailed as a
wonder drug, is constantly opening up new
possibilities and indications, says Dr. Gisela Latta
(photo), Senior Science Manager for Bayer
HealthCares Consumer Care Division. Of particular
note according to Latta is the drugs highly
successful use in the prevention of secondary heart
attack and stroke, because in this way it can extend
lives including potentially that of Angelika
Franz, who suffers from heart disease.
Read more on page 10
BAYER CROPSCIENCE In the cotton seed business,
customer satisfaction has a lot to do with harvest
yields as well as product quality. Dr. Tony Arioli
and Dr. Stephan Soyka (photo, from left), scientists
at Bayer CropScience, are well aware of this as they
further develop the highly successful cotton seed
FiberMax®. Using the latest
biotechnological methods, they are working to ensure
that FiberMax® continues to deliver value
well beyond many growers expectations. Says U.S.
cotton farmer Jerry Mimms: FiberMax
enables me to compete in cotton production today.
Read more on page 64
BAYER MATERIALSCIENCE Its name is doubly true:
the new soccer ball from adidas is called
+Teamgeist Team Spirit and its designed to
help the best eleven win the World Cup. Winning a
game is of course a team effort and so was the
development of a ball like this one, as global key
account manager Dr. Thorsten Bestvater (left) and
Thomas Michaelis of Bayer MaterialScience can
readily testify. Bayer Leverkusen soccer player
Bernd Schneider is positive in his assessment: This
ball is a boon to everyone on the team.
Read more on page 192
|
|
|
4 Chairmans Letter
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Our
efforts have paid off
Dear Stockholders:
I look back on 2005 with the greatest satisfaction I have felt since becoming Chairman.
Last year was among the most successful in Bayers history. We had forecasted a 20 percent
rise in earnings, but actually far exceeded those expectations, ending 2005 with underlying
EBIT up 56 percent from the previous year, at 3.3 billion.
Our underlying EBITDA margin of 18.6 percent already put us very close to our 2006 target of
19 percent, a year ahead of schedule.
The other key data also underscore our focus on growth:
|
|
Sales rose 18 percent to 27.4 billion |
|
|
|
Net income jumped 133 percent to 1.6 billion |
|
|
|
Net cash flow advanced 57 percent to 3.5
billion |
|
|
|
Cash flow return on investment (CFROI) reached the record level of 12.4 percent |
That last number is particularly important for me. It means we have created substantial value
for you, our stockholders.
We are pleased that the capital market is rewarding our success. With a 51 percent increase
in the share price in 2005, Bayer was among the best-performing equities in the German stock
index DAX. Our market capitalization rose by 8.7 billion in the space of twelve months.
All this clearly illustrates that our strategic realignment toward innovation and growth
has lastingly improved the Bayer Groups performance capability.
We made
further progress last year not only operationally, but also strategically from
the LANXESS spin-off through the successful integration of the Roche consumer health
business to the repositioning of our Pharmaceuticals Division.
We completed the most extensive restructuring process in Bayers history within an extremely
short period, the final step in that process being the successful listing of LANXESS on the
stock market early in the year. The strong upward trend in the price of both companies
shares shows that we made the right decisions.
Our new strategy not only laid the foundation for a successful 2005, but has also put
the entire enterprise on track for the future.
Let me
start with Bayer HealthCare Germanys biggest health care company, with sales of
9.4 billion. We gave this subgroup a new focus, and it fared outstandingly last year. The
aim is to continue matching or outpacing market growth in all areas.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Chairmans Letter 5 |
The Pharmaceuticals Division has a new identity, with a stronger concentration on the
specialties business and on a restructured and optimized primary care business. The
divisions performance in recent months has been very encouraging.
Our specialty products, including in particular the biotechnologically manufactured
hemophilia drug Kogenate, have considerable growth potential. We believe our new cancer drug,
Nexavar, could eventually exceed 1 billion in annual sales. The same applies to our oral
antithrombotic Factor Xa inhibitor, which entered phase III clinical testing at the end of
2005 for the prevention of venous thromboembolism. Our Pharmaceuticals Division also has
twelve projects in phase I trials and another eleven in preclinical development. We plan to
further support the business with external growth, for example through inlicensing.
We have strengthened the other parts of the HealthCare subgroup as well. Following the
acquisition of the Roche consumer health activities, our Consumer Care Division is now among
the worlds top three suppliers in the self-medication business. The newly acquired products
Bepanthen, Rennie and Supradyn have performed particularly well, bringing us a significant
step closer to our goal of becoming the leading supplier in this segment. We integrated the
acquisition more quickly than we had previously thought possible.
And the
other HealthCare divisions Animal Health, Diagnostics and
Diabetes Care also
hold strong positions in their respective markets. We plan to expand all of these businesses
faster than the market average.
|
|
|
6 Chairmans Letter
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
We continue to see considerable potential at Bayer CropScience. This company is the world
market leader in conventional crop protection and in the environmental science and seed
treatment businesses. While it is on the right track in terms of performance, we have not
yet reached our goal. We nevertheless believe that we can set the industry standard in the
medium term.
In a market characterized by only moderate expansion, we consider our own innovative
capability to be the main factor for organic growth in this area. The years since 2000 have
seen the launch of sixteen new active ingredients. Including ten further substances that we
plan to introduce by 2011, we anticipate total sales potential of up to 2 billion from our
CropScience pipeline. We also expect to achieve faster-than-average growth through the
expansion of our environmental science, seed treatment and plant biotechnology franchises.
Regarding MaterialScience, we remain in confident mood following a record-breaking year. This
subgroup is a global leader in terms of market positions and technologies, occupying first
place in both polyurethanes and coating raw materials, and the number two slot in
polycarbonates. We envisage a major opportunity in the development of the Asian markets, and
therefore plan to invest about US$1.8 billion in world-scale polymer facilities in China
alone through 2009.
At MaterialScience, too, we are pursuing a strategy of growth through innovation. Some 20
percent of this subgroups total revenues already come from new products and applications
introduced within the past five years, and that ratio is set to increase.
To expedite growth and foster a high level of innovation in the future, we have earmarked
1.5 billion for capital expenditures on property, plant and equipment this year and, as in
2005, we plan to spend roughly 1.9 billion on research and development. This is by far the
largest research budget of any chemical and pharmaceutical company in Germany.
To further support the innovation process, we have launched a global initiative named
Triple-i the three is standing for inspiration, ideas and innovation. The initiative is
designed to boost our employees willingness and ability to submit creative ideas and
suggestions for consideration and possible commercialization by units of the Bayer Group. To
this end a special innovation support procedure has been developed. The first part of the
money to be made available under this program will go for our project to manufacture
plant-based pharmaceutical active ingredients.
I firmly believe that innovation and growth are the key success factors in the globalized
business arena, and I am therefore certain that our realignment has paved the way to a
bright future for our company.
The efforts we put into restructuring the Bayer Group have paid off. Since the beginning of
2003, we have steadily improved year-on-year earnings before special
items our actual
operating performance in twelve consecutive quarters.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Chairmans Letter 7 |
Of course we want you, our stockholders, to benefit from our economic success. We
therefore propose to raise the dividend for 2005 by more than 70 percent to 0.95.
And what do we have planned for the current year?
We aim to continue expanding and to further improve our operating performance. Our goal is to
grow with, or faster than, all of our markets, and to achieve total Group sales in excess of
28 billion.
We are targeting a small further improvement in underlying EBIT and underlying EBITDA, and
thus a record earnings level.
While we remain oriented toward profitability, I am also personally committed to ensuring
that Bayer embraces the principle of good corporate citizenship. For example, we are involved
in more than 300 social responsibility projects worldwide from initiatives to combat
hunger in Brazil through our joint environmental efforts with the United Nations to the fight
against AIDS and sleeping sickness in Africa. We play a pioneering role in such activities
throughout the world, and intend to expand that role in the future.
My colleagues and I on the Board of Management would like to thank you for the trust you have
placed in Bayer. Our special thanks also go to our employees. Together, we have achieved a
great deal over the past year. I am very pleased that the broad majority of respondents to
our most recent managerial employees survey said they are proud to work for Bayer. I agree
with them: we can all be proud that we have put Bayer back on track following difficult years
of reorganization and realignment.
We will continue to work very hard to remain on the successful course we have set for our
company, at the same time helping to sustainably improve peoples health, nutrition and
quality of life through our products true to the slogan we chose for our new mission
statement: Bayer: Science For A Better Life.
Sincerely,
/s/ Werner Wenning
|
|
|
8 Board of Management
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
DR. RICHARD POTT
The member responsible
for Strategy and Human Resources and the
North, Central and South America regions, Dr.
Richard Pott is also Bayer AGs Labor
Director. Born in 1953, Richard Pott studied
physics at the University of Cologne,
Germany, where he also obtained his
doctorate. In 1984 he joined the companys
Central Research Division. After holding
various positions in the Corporate Staff
Division he became Head of the former
Specialty Products Business Group in 1999.
Pott was appointed to the Bayer AG Board of
Management in May 2002.
WERNER WENNING
Chairman of the Bayer AG
Board of Management since April 2002. Born in
1946, Werner Wenning joined the company in
1966 as a commercial trainee. He held a
number of positions with Bayer in Germany and
abroad, serving as managing director of Bayer
subsidiaries in Peru and Spain and later as
Head of the Corporate Planning and
Controlling Division. Wenning was appointed
to the Board of Management as Chief Financial
Officer in February 1997. Since September
2005 he has also been President of the German
Chemical Industry Association.
KLAUS KÜHN
Chief Financial Officer and
responsible for the Europe, Africa and Middle
East regions. Born in 1952, Klaus Kühn
studied mathematics and physics at the
Technical University of Berlin, Germany,
gaining a mathematics degree in 1978. He also
studied in the United States, where he
obtained a Master of Business Administration
degree. Kühn joined Bayer in 1998 as Head of
the Finance Section, and shortly afterwards was made
Head of the Group Finance Division. He was
appointed to the Bayer AG Board of Management
in May 2002.
DR. UDO OELS
Responsible for Innovation,
Technology and Environment and the Asia
region. Born in 1944, Udo Oels studied
chemistry at the Technical University of
Hanover, Germany. He joined Bayer AG as a
research chemist in 1976 and held a number of
positions with Bayer in Germany and abroad,
including those of polycarbonate production
manager at the Bayer site in Baytown, Texas,
and Head of Research and later General
Manager of the former Organic Chemicals
Business Group. Oels was appointed to the
Bayer AG Board of Management in February
1996.
Dr. Wolfgang Plischke was appointed to the
Bayer AG Board of Management effective March
1, 2006.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Board of Management 9 |
|
|
|
10 Bayer HealthCare
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Bayer: Science For A Better Life 11 |
|
|
|
12 Bayer HealthCare
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
What started out as a simple remedy to
alleviate the symptoms of rheumatism has
since become one of the worlds best-known
medicines. And the unparalleled career of acetylsalicylic acid is far from
over. Almost every day there are reports of
new potential indications and mechanisms of
action.
An outstanding example is in the area of
heart attack and stroke prophylaxis. For
secondary prevention, scientists at Bayer
HealthCare developed Aspirin®
Cardio, a low-dosage tablet that is resistant
to gastric juices and releases the active
ingredient gradually.
The product is currently showing growth rates
of up to 30 percent. In Switzerland, where it
was first launched, Aspirin®
Cardio now holds a significant share in the
market, and in Japan, too, it is the market
leader in its segment. Aspirin®
Cardio is approved in more than 35 countries
from Argentina to Taiwan for reducing
the risk of secondary heart attack or stroke.
However, extending the life cycles of established medicines through selective
post-marketing development is only one factor
in the companys commercial achievements.
About half of Bayers research expenditures
are currently made to develop new health care
products and with great success.
At the end of 2005, Bayer HealthCare was
granted marketing authorization in the United
States for Nexavar®, a new
medicine to treat advanced kidney cancer.
Nexavar® is expected to be
approved in Europe in the second half of 2006
(see cover picture caption), and Bayer plans
to develop the active ingredient for the
therapy of other tumors as well. The product
is considered to have blockbuster
potential, which means it could achieve total
annual sales of over 1 billion. A new oral
drug to prevent and treat thromboembolic
diseases is believed to have similar
potential. This substance is currently in
phase III clinical testing for a once-daily
dose.
Bayer is also optimistic for its
early-stage development candidates. Three of
these projects are expected to be transferred
to phase III clinical testing by the end of
2006.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Bayer: Science For A Better Life 13 |
|
|
|
14 Management Report
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
New strategic alignment pays off
2005 a successful year for Bayer
|
|
Strong growth: sales increase 18 percent to 27.4 billion |
|
|
|
EBIT before special items advances 56 percent to 3.3 billion |
|
|
|
Group net income jumps from 0.7 billion to 1.6 billion |
|
|
|
Strong cash flow performance return on capital at record level |
|
|
|
Growth continues unabated in the fourth quarter |
|
|
|
Dividend of 0.95 per share proposed (+ 73 percent) |
|
|
|
Further performance improvement targeted for 2006 |
Overview of Sales, Earnings and Financial Position
Bayer had an extremely successful
year in 2005. We made significant gains in
our key indicators, including sales, earnings
and cash flow performance. Our return on
capital (CFROI) was at a record level. The
strategic realignment toward innovation and
growth has fundamentally improved the Groups
operating performance and earning power. Our
cost-containment and efficiency programs have
boosted profitability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Sales |
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
+ 4 |
|
|
|
+ 18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volumes |
|
|
+ 8 |
|
|
|
+ 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices |
|
|
+ 1 |
|
|
|
+ 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange rates |
|
|
- 4 |
|
|
|
+ 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio changes |
|
|
- 1 |
|
|
|
+ 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of the Bayer Group rose by
17.6 percent year on year to 27,383 million.
Growth was chiefly attributable to the
HealthCare and MaterialScience subgroups,
where sales advanced by 17.0 percent and 24.4
percent, respectively. CropScience sales
remained at the previous years level,
largely because of difficult market
conditions in Brazil. Adjusted for the
effects of currency and portfolio changes,
Group sales rose by 7.5 percent. The
portfolio effects mainly relate to the
consumer health business acquired from Roche
and sales to LANXESS following its spin-off
from Bayer.
The positive business trend led to a
considerable improvement in the operating
result. EBIT before special items climbed by
55.9 percent to 3,300 million (2004: 2,117
million). All three subgroups contributed to
this increase. The largest EBIT contributions
came from MaterialScience (1,404 million)
and HealthCare (1,319 million). While the
exceptionally strong growth in EBIT at
MaterialScience (+ 110.2 percent) resulted
largely from selling price increases, the
improvement at HealthCare (+ 26.9 percent)
was driven primarily by the fast-growing
pharmaceuticals business and a very strong
performance by the newly acquired products of
the Consumer Care Division. At Crop-Science,
where EBIT advanced by 31.2 percent to 685 million, the main positive effect came
from the absence of goodwill amortization.
EBITDA before special items moved ahead
by 24.9 percent to 5,082 million (2004:
4,069 million), yielding an underlying
EBITDA margin of 18.6 percent in 2005 that
fell only slightly short of the target for
2006.
There were, however, a number of special
items that diminished EBIT by 488 million on
aggregate, compared with net special charges
of 242 million in the prior year. The
special charges in 2005 included, in
particular, 336 million relat-
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Management Report 15 |
ed to antitrust proceedings in the polymers field, 105 million in litigation-related charges
at Bayer HealthCare, 106 million in
expenses arising from the termination of
the co-promotion agreement for
Levitra® outside the United
States, and 71 million for the
integration of the acquired consumer
health business. Total charges of 127
million were taken for restructuring
measures in all subgroups. Chief among
the positive special items that
partially offset these charges was a
one-time net gain of 283 million from
changes in our pension systems in the
United States and Germany.
EBIT after special items improved in 2005 by
50.0 percent to 2,812 million (2004: 1,875
million). EBITDA rose by 21.2 percent year on
year to 4,647 million (2004: 3,834
million).
After a non-operating result of minus 613
million, pre-tax income climbed by 80.0
percent to 2,199 million. After tax expense
of 641 million and minority stockholders
interest, net income of the Bayer Group rose
by 912 million to 1,597 million. Earnings
per share thus improved from 0.94 to 2.19.
The growth in earnings in 2005 was also
reflected in the gross cash flow, which
advanced by 20.5 percent to 3,477 million
(2004: 2,885 million). Net cash flow rose
even more strongly, gaining 56.6 percent to
3,542 million.
Thanks to the higher cash flow, the
increase in net debt at the beginning of the
year due to the acquisition of the Roche
consumer health business had been largely
offset by year end. Net debt from continuing operations came to 5,494 million
on December 31, 2005, exceeding the
prior-year figure of 4,891 million by 603
million.
Cash flow
return on investment (CFROI) at
12.4 percent was at a record level. We
thus exceeded our internal hurdle for capital
costs including reproduction by 2.7
percentage points, or 823 million, creating
substantial additional value for our
stockholders.
Our success in 2005 as a whole was also
bolstered by a continuing positive business
trend in the fourth quarter, the strongest
quarter of 2005 in terms of sales. Business
expanded by 16.1 percent year on year to
7,095 million thanks to major expansion in
HealthCare (+ 24.0 percent) and continued
dynamic growth in MaterialScience (+ 15.7
percent). CropScience sales dipped due to low
business volumes in Brazil.
EBIT before special items climbed by
54.5 percent from the final quarter of 2004,
to 615 million, even after a significant
increase in marketing expenditures,
particularly at Bayer HealthCare, to support
future growth. After special items, which
mainly included 322 million related to
antitrust proceedings in the polymers field,
26 million in litigation-related charges in
HealthCare and 20 million in integration
costs for the consumer health business, EBIT
fell by 44.3 percent to 192 million. Net
cash flow increased by 51.7 percent to 1,315
million, partly as a result of a substantial
decline in working capital in all subgroups,
particularly MaterialScience.
|
|
|
16 Management Report
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Operating Environment in 2005
The global economy continued to grow
strongly in 2005. Following a slight
downswing in the second quarter, rapid
expansion continued for the remainder of the
year. Several sharp rises in the price of
oil, particularly in the first half of the
year, failed to impair the positive
underlying trend. The worlds two major
growth engines, the United States and China,
once again performed very well, stimulating
other countries economies with their thirst
for imports. The business environment in the
industrialized countries was further buoyed
by favorable monetary conditions.
The pace of growth in the United States was
practically undiminished in spite of adverse
monetary and fiscal factors, and the
hurricanes in the fall only temporarily
impacted the economy. With the trade balance
providing hardly any growth impetus, the
economy was supported mainly by robust
domestic demand. Higher corporate earnings
triggered brisk investment activity.
Economic development in Europe was
considerably more restrained. The euro zone
fell behind the other major regions in terms
of growth, although the economy picked up
somewhat in the last few months of the year
thanks to increasing domestic demand and a
positive trade balance. Expansion was
hampered by the high price of oil, the main
effect of which was to hold back consumer
demand. The moderate rise in output was
solely the result of high demand for exports.
While consumer sentiment remained downbeat,
industry confidence rose toward year end and
the overall economic outlook became a little
brighter.
The Japanese economy continued to expand at a
moderate rate during the year. The upswing
was reinforced in the first half by the
effects of positive political indicators on
private consumption, and also by brisk export
demand. Corporate investment also continued
to increase in light of improved sales and
earnings forecasts and high replacement
demand. While economic activity had slowed
somewhat by the end of the year, the overall
trend remained positive.
Outside of the industrialized countries,
production continued to expand steadily in
2005, if not quite as briskly as in the
previous year. The Asian threshold economies
developed well. Most of the major Asian
countries registered strong growth in
exports, with domestic demand also picking
up. China continued to forge ahead thanks to
higher exports and brisk domestic demand.
Even the steps taken by the government to
cool the economy have had little effect so
far.
The economies of Latin America continued to
grow thanks to relatively high raw material
prices, although the upswing lost some of its
momentum. This growth was driven primarily by
raw material exports. Domestic demand picked
up, contributing to the favorable overall
picture.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Management Report 17 |
Performance by Subgroup and Segment
Our realigned business activities
are grouped into the HealthCare, CropScience
and MaterialScience subgroups. In view of the portfolio
changes that took place in the Bayer Group at
the beginning of 2005, including in
particular the spin-off of LANXESS and the
acquisition of the Roche consumer health
(OTC) business, we altered the presentation
of our segment reporting at the beginning of
the first quarter of 2005 as shown below: (see also
Note 6 to the financial statements on page
110 ff.).
In accordance with the new requirements of
the International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS), the information in this
annual report relates primarily to continuing
operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales by Subgroup and Segment |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2004 share |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2005 share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Group |
|
|
|
|
|
of Group |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
HealthCare |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,058 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
9,429 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pharmaceuticals, Biological Products |
|
|
3,961 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
4,067 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Care |
|
|
1,336 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2,355 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diabetes Care, Diagnostics |
|
|
1,975 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
2,151 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Animal Health |
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CropScience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,946 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
5,896 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crop Protection |
|
|
4,957 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
4,874 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental Science, BioScience |
|
|
989 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,022 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MaterialScience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,597 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
10,695 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Materials |
|
|
3,248 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
4,086 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Systems |
|
|
5,349 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
6,609 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,363 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Group |
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
23,278 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
27,383 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 Management Report
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Bayer HealthCare
Sales of the Bayer HealthCare
subgroup rose by 17.0 percent from the
previous year, to 9,429 million. Growth was
attributable mainly to the consumer health
business acquired from Roche, which
contributed 1,061 million to revenues.
Adjusted for currency effects and portfolio
changes, sales were up by 2.9 percent year on
year, despite the significant decline in
sales of Cipro® following the
expiration of its U.S. patent.
EBIT came to 1,102 million, which was
146 million, or 15.3 percent, more than in
the previous year. A number of special items
diminished earnings by 217 million on
aggregate. This figure includes in
particular charges relating to the transfer
of co-promotion rights for
Levitra® back to Bayer,
litigation-related expenses, and the cost of
integrating the acquired OTC business. These
charges were partially offset by a one-time
gain from changes in our pension plans. EBIT
before special items advanced by 280
million, or 26.9 percent, to 1,319 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer HealthCare |
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Sales |
|
|
8,058 |
|
|
|
9,429 |
|
|
|
+ 17.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA* |
|
|
1,392 |
|
|
|
1,612 |
|
|
|
+ 15.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating result [EBIT] |
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
1,102 |
|
|
|
+ 15.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which special items |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cash flow* |
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
+ 20.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow* |
|
|
1,053 |
|
|
|
1,351 |
|
|
|
+ 28.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
for definition see Bayer Group Key Data on front flap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Best-Selling Bayer HealthCare Products |
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Ascensia® product line (Diabetes Care) |
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
+ 11.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kogenate® (Biological Products) |
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
+ 17.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adalat® (Pharmaceuticals) |
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
- 1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aspirin® (Consumer Care/Pharmaceuticals) |
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
+ 4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ciprobay®/Cipro® (Pharmaceuticals) |
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
- 37.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advia Centaur® system (Diagnostics) |
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
+ 16.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avalox®/Avelox® (Pharmaceuticals) |
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
+ 14.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glucobay® (Pharmaceuticals) |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
+ 6.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Levitra® (Pharmaceuticals) |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
+ 34.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advantage®/Advantix® (Animal Health) |
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
+ 20.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trasylol® (Pharmaceuticals) |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
+ 34.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aleve®/naproxen (Consumer Care) |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
178 |
* |
|
|
+ 97.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baytril® (Animal Health) |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
+ 1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rapidlab®/Rapidpoint® (Diagnostics) |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
+ 6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinitek® Urinalysis (Diagnostics) |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
+ 3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
5,455 |
|
|
|
5,744 |
|
|
|
+ 5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proportion of Bayer HealthCare sales |
|
|
68 |
% |
|
|
61 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
sales after acquisition of the remaining interest in our U.S. joint venture |
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Management Report 19 |
Pharmaceuticals, Biological Products
Sales of the Pharmaceuticals, Biological
Products segment rose by 106 million, or 2.7
percent, to 4,067 million.
Sales of the Pharmaceuticals Division receded by 58 million, or 1.8 percent, to 3,108
million. In our U.S. specialties
business we achieved pleasing growth in
sales of Trasylol®. Outside
the United States, Avelox®
and Levitra® made strong
gains in the market. This enabled us to
partly offset a 312 million decline in U.S. sales due to
expiration of the patent on our
anti-infective Cipro® and the
marketing of our primary care products
in the United States by Schering-Plough.
In the Biological Products Division, sales
rose by 164 million year on year to 959
million. Kogenate® made encouraging
sales gains, particularly in Europe and the
United States, totaling 100 million. In
Europe and Canada, we benefited from the
successful market introduction of our
BioSet® delivery device for more
convenient infusion.
EBIT of the Pharmaceuticals, Biological
Products segment moved ahead by 76 million
year on year to 475 million, after net
special charges of 140 million. Adjusted for
special items, EBIT rose by 36.1 percent to
615 million, mainly because of improved cost
structures and the growth in sales.
Consumer Care
Sales of the Consumer Care segment
climbed by 76.3 percent to 2,355 million.
The integration of the OTC business acquired
from Roche went even better than expected. A
very positive performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pharmaceuticals, Biological Products |
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Sales |
|
|
3,961 |
|
|
|
4,067 |
|
|
|
+ 2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pharmaceuticals |
|
|
3,166 |
|
|
|
3,108 |
|
|
|
- 1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Biological Products |
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
959 |
|
|
|
+ 20.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA* |
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
+ 15.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating result [EBIT] |
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
+ 19.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which special items |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cash flow* |
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
+ 16.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow* |
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
+ 84.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Care |
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Sales |
|
|
1,336 |
|
|
|
2,355 |
|
|
|
+ 76.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA* |
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
+ 16.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating result [EBIT] |
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
- 4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which special items |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cash flow* |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
+ 38.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow* |
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
+ 15.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
for definition see Bayer Group Key Data on front flap |
|
|
|
20 Management Report
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
was recorded by products such as
Bepanthen®/ Bepanthol®
(+ 18.8 percent), Rennie® (+ 7.2
percent) and Supradyn® (+ 19.0
percent), with the newly acquired business
accounting for sales of 1,061 million.
EBIT of the Consumer Care segment fell
by 9 million, or 4.9 percent, to 174
million. This was after the effect of
acquiring inventories from Roche at selling
prices, which diminished margins by 57
million. Earnings were diminished by a total
of 118 million in special charges related to
the integration of the business acquired from
Roche and by litigation-related expenses.
EBIT before special items climbed by 37.1
percent to 292 million, with a major
earnings contribution coming from the newly
acquired OTC business.
Diabetes Care, Diagnostics
Sales of the Diabetes Care, Diagnostics
segment grew by 176 million, or 8.9 percent,
to 2,151 million.
In the Diabetes Care Division, sales
advanced by 10.0 percent to 718 million as a
result of strong growth in Europe. Sales of
the Diagnostics Division rose by 8.4 percent
to 1,433 million, thanks mainly to our Advia
Centaur® laboratory testing
systems.
EBIT of the segment improved by 57 million to
274 million, including net special gains of
34 million. EBIT before special items rose
by 23 million, or 10.6 percent, to 240
million.
Animal Health
Sales of the Animal Health segment rose
by a gratifying 8.9 percent, to 856 million,
the increase being mainly the result of a
strong performance by our
Advantage® product line in the
United States. Also contributing to growth
were the market introductions of our
parasiticides Advocate® in Europe
and Canada, and Profender® in
Europe.
EBIT of the Animal Health segment advanced by
22 million, or 14.0 percent, from the
previous year to 179 million. Before
special gains of 7 million, EBIT
improved by 9.6 percent to 172 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diabetes Care, Diagnostics |
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Sales |
|
|
1,975 |
|
|
|
2,151 |
|
|
|
+ 8.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diabetes Care |
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
+ 10.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diagnostics |
|
|
1,322 |
|
|
|
1,433 |
|
|
|
+ 8.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA* |
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
+ 16.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating result [EBIT) |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
+ 26.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which special items |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cash flow* |
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
+ 11.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow* |
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
- 3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Animal Health |
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Sales |
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
+ 8.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA* |
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
+ 12.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating result [EBIT] |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
+ 14.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which special items |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cash flow* |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
+ 33.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow* |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
+ 39.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
for definition see Bayer Group Key Data on front flap |
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Management Report 21 |
Bayer CropScience
Sales of the Bayer CropScience subgroup, at
5,896 million, were about level with the
previous year. Adjusted for currency and
portfolio changes, business was down by 4.2
percent. The lower sales in Crop Protection
were partly offset by growth in the
Environmental Science, BioScience segment.
EBIT advanced by 40.2 percent to 690
million. Before special items, EBIT rose by
163 million to 685 million. This was due to the absence of the
134 million in goodwill amortization
charges taken in 2004 and improved
operating efficiencies in the
Environmental Science, BioScience
segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer CropScience |
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Sales |
|
|
5,946 |
|
|
|
5,896 |
|
|
|
- 0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA* |
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
1,284 |
|
|
|
+ 5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating result [EBIT] |
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
+ 40.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which special items |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cash flow* |
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
+ 8.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow* |
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
904 |
|
|
|
+ 16.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
for definition see Bayer Group Key Data on front flap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Best-Selling Bayer CropScience Products* |
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Confidor®/Gaucho®/Admire®
/Merit®
(Insecticides/Seed Treatment/Environmental Science) |
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
- 2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Folicur®/Raxil® (Fungicides/Seed Treatment) |
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
- 17.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basta®/Liberty® (Herbicides) |
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
+ 11.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puma® (Herbicides) |
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
- 9.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flint®/Stratego®/Sphere® (Fungicides ) |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
- 19.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decis®/K-Othrine® (Insecticides/Environmental Science) |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
- 7.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlantis® (Herbicides) |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
+ 46.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Betanal® (Herbicides) |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
- 11.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fenikan® (Herbicides) |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
+ 0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poncho® (Seed Treatment) |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
+ 93.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2,266 |
|
|
|
2,201 |
|
|
|
- 2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proportion of Bayer CropScience sales |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Figures are based on active ingredient class. For the sake of clarity, only the principal brands and business units are listed. |
|
|
|
22 Management Report
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Crop Protection
Sales in the Crop Protection segment
dipped by 1.7 percent from the prior year, to
4,874 million.
In the Insecticides business unit,
business was down by 4.9 percent to 1,311
million. The continuing drought in southern
Europe, Brazil and Australia led to lower
sales of some products. Business was also
hampered by significantly lower pest
infestation, particularly in Asia. We
successfully launched another substance from
the ketoenols class under the tradename
Oberon® in important markets such
as the United States and the Netherlands.
Sales in the Fungicides business unit
declined by 2.3 percent to 1,248 million.
Although Asian rust, a disease of soybeans,
persisted in large areas of Brazil, business
with our Flint® and
Folicur® fungicides shrank
considerably due to the extremely long drought in the south of the country
and its effects on the farm economy. Sales of
our Proline® family of cereal
fungicides rose strongly throughout Europe in
the second year following their launch.
The Herbicides business unit recorded sales of
1,840 million, which was just 0.8 percent
below the previous year. While business
was hurt by adverse weather conditions
in southern Europe, our new products
Atlantis®,
Hussar®, MaisTer®
and Olympus® made very good
progress, their sales increasing by more
than 16 percent on aggregate.
Basta®/Liberty®
also posted strong gains, particularly
in North America.
Sales of the Seed Treatment business
unit rose by 6.3 percent to 475 million,
largely due to the 2004 acquisition of the
remaining 50 percent interest in Gustafson.
Significant gains for the seed treatment
Poncho® more than offset lower
sales of fungicidal seed treatment
formulations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crop Protection |
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Sales |
|
|
4,957 |
|
|
|
4,874 |
|
|
|
- 1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insecticides |
|
|
1,378 |
|
|
|
1,311 |
|
|
|
- 4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fungicides |
|
|
1,277 |
|
|
|
1,248 |
|
|
|
- 2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Herbicides |
|
|
1,855 |
|
|
|
1,840 |
|
|
|
- 0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seed Treatment |
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
+ 6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA* |
|
|
978 |
|
|
|
1,026 |
|
|
|
+ 4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating result [EBIT] |
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
+ 37.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which special items |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cash flow* |
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
762 |
|
|
|
+ 3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow* |
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
+ 9.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
for definition see Bayer Group Key Data on front flap |
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Management
Report 23 |
EBIT of the Crop Protection segment grew
by 146 million, or 37.8 percent, to 532
million. Before special items, EBIT advanced
by 97 million to 525 million. The earnings improvement was
due to the absence of goodwill
amortization.
Environmental Science, BioScience
Sales of the Environmental Science,
BioScience segment rose by 3.3 percent in
2005 to 1,022 million.
The Environmental Science Business Group saw
business expand by 2.4 percent to 694
million, due in part to higher sales of
Premise® (insecticide),
Revolver® (herbicide) and K-O
Tab® for vector control. Sales of
Consumer Products held steady year on year.
In the BioScience Business Group, sales
advanced by 5.5 percent to 328 million, the
main contributions to growth coming from
InVigor® (canola seed) in North
America, FiberMax® (cotton seed)
in the United States and Europe, and the
vegetable seeds business.
EBIT of the Environmental Science,
BioScience segment improved by 52 million to
158 million. EBIT before special items
climbed by 66 million, or 70.2 percent, from
the prior year. Earnings growth was bolstered
by strong sales of Professional Products and
the absence of goodwill amortization.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental Science, BioScience |
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Sales |
|
|
989 |
|
|
|
1,022 |
|
|
|
+ 3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental Science |
|
|
678 |
|
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
+ 2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BioScience |
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
+ 5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA* |
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
+ 7.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating result [EBIT] |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
+ 49.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which special items |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cash flow* |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
+ 31.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow* |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
+ 45.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
for definition see Bayer Group Key Data on front flap |
|
|
|
24 Management Report
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Bayer MaterialScience
Sales of the Bayer MaterialScience
subgroup advanced in 2005 by 24.4 percent to
10,695 million. Adjusted for currency and
portfolio changes, business expanded by 19.4
percent. The higher revenues were mainly the
result of price increases implemented in all
business units and regions.
EBIT of this subgroup, at 1,369
million, posted a substantial 728 million
improvement from the previous year after net
special charges of 35 million. The special
items included gains from changes to our
pension plans in the United States and
Germany, various special expenses for the
reorganization of our polyurethanes business,
and provisions recorded in connection with
the settlement of civil antitrust suits in
the polymers field. EBIT before special items
climbed substantially to 1,404 million. Our
price before volume strategy enabled us to
offset the sharp rise in raw material costs
and improve our margins.
Materials
Sales in the Materials segment moved ahead by
838 million, or 25.8 percent, to 4,086
million, with increases of around 30
percent in Polycarbonates and at H.C.
Starck. Higher selling prices, in
particular, contributed to the increase.
There was also a slight further
improvement in volumes.
EBIT of the Materials segment more than
doubled, climbing by 116.0 percent to 633
million. Raising selling prices enabled us
not only to offset higher material costs, but
also to widen our margins. EBIT before
special items rose by 313 million to 606
million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer MaterialScience |
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Sales |
|
|
8,597 |
|
|
|
10,695 |
|
|
|
+ 24.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA* |
|
|
1,216 |
|
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
+ 57.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating result [EBIT] |
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
1,369 |
|
|
|
+ 113.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which special items |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cash flow* |
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
1,402 |
|
|
|
+ 58.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow* |
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
+ 178.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
for definition see Bayer Group Key Data on front flap |
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Management Report 25 |
Systems
Sales of the Systems segment amounted to
6,609 million in 2005, exceeding the
prior-year level by 1,260 million, or 23.6
percent. The increase was primarily driven by
our Polyurethanes business, where we were
able to substantially raise selling prices.
The expansion in Inorganic Basic Chemicals
resulted mainly from product sales to LANXESS
and higher market prices for sodium hydroxide
solution.
EBIT of the Systems segment also showed
a major improvement, increasing by 388
million to 736 million. EBIT before special
items rose by 423 million to 798 million.
Here, too, we successfully passed on raw
material cost increases in our selling
prices, boosting margins considerably.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Materials |
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Sales |
|
|
3,248 |
|
|
|
4,086 |
|
|
|
+ 25.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Polycarbonates |
|
|
2,035 |
|
|
|
2,645 |
|
|
|
+ 30.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thermoplastic Polyurethanes |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
+ 5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wolff Walsrode |
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
+ 0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H.C. Starck |
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
+ 30.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA* |
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
+ 58.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating result [EBIT] |
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
+ 116.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which special items |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cash flow* |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
+ 55.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow* |
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
+ 147.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Systems |
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Sales |
|
|
5,349 |
|
|
|
6,609 |
|
|
|
+ 23.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Polyurethanes |
|
|
3,872 |
|
|
|
4,792 |
|
|
|
+ 23.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coatings, Adhesives, Sealants |
|
|
1,237 |
|
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
+ 7.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inorganic Basic Chemicals |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
+ 74.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA* |
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
|
+ 56.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating result [EBIT] |
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
+ 111.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which special items |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cash flow* |
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
+ 61.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow* |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
for definition see Bayer Group Key Data on front flap |
|
|
|
26 Management Report
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Performance by Region
Bayers business expanded
considerably in 2005, with sales advancing by
4,105 million, or 17.6 percent, to 27,383
million. More than half of this growth was
achieved in Europe, where sales rose by
2,155 million, or 22.0 percent. The increase
in Germany was above the average for the
region as a whole, with sales moving ahead by
1,137 million, or 37.4 percent, to 4,176
million. When adjusted for the effects of
portfolio changes mainly sales to LANXESS
the increase was about 10 percent in
Germany and 6 percent in Europe as a whole.
This expansion was chiefly attributable to
the Material-Science and HealthCare
subgroups.
In North America, sales advanced by 12.7
percent in 2005 to 7,340 million. The
biggest gain was recorded by the
MaterialScience subgroups polyurethanes
business. In HealthCare, pleasing growth in
Kogenate® sales and the
diagnostics business more than offset the
expected decline in revenues due to
expiration of the patent on Cipro®
and the marketing of our primary care
products by Schering-Plough.
Sales in the Asia/Pacific region grew by
15.5 percent to 4,578 million. The biggest
contribution to this increase came from
China, where sales climbed by 39
percent. Our largest subgroup in the
Asia/Pacific region is MaterialScience, whose
sales rose by 21.1 percent to 2,143 million
thanks to higher prices and volumes. Sales of
Consumer Care in Asia more than tripled,
mainly because of our acquisition of the
Roche consumer health business.
We improved sales in Latin
America/Africa/Middle East by 16.7 percent to
3,535 million. In this region, above-average
increases in the HealthCare and
MaterialScience subgroups more than
compensated for lower sales in CropScience in
2005, which were partly due to the prolonged
drought and the weakness of the farm economy
in Brazil.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales by Region and Segment (by market) |
|
|
|
Europe |
|
|
North America |
|
|
Asia/Pacific |
|
|
Latin America/Africa/Middle East |
|
|
Total Segment |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
% yoy |
|
|
adj.% yoy |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
% yoy |
|
|
adj.% yoy |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
% yoy |
|
|
adj.% yoy |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
% yoy |
|
|
adj.% yoy |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
% yoy |
|
|
adj.% yoy |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer HealthCare |
|
|
3,008 |
|
|
|
3,719 |
|
|
|
+ 23.6 |
|
|
|
+ 23.6 |
|
|
|
2,907 |
|
|
|
3,001 |
|
|
|
+ 3.2 |
|
|
|
+ 2.2 |
|
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
|
1,450 |
|
|
|
+ 15.1 |
|
|
|
+ 14.4 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
1,259 |
|
|
|
+ 42.6 |
|
|
|
+ 36.3 |
|
|
|
8,058 |
|
|
|
9,429 |
|
|
|
+ 17.0 |
|
|
|
+ 16.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pharmaceuticals, Biological Products |
|
|
1,577 |
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
+ 1.5 |
|
|
|
+ 1.5 |
|
|
|
1,172 |
|
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
|
-3.7 |
|
|
|
-5.5 |
|
|
|
851 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
+ 5.8 |
|
|
|
+ 5.7 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
+ 21.3 |
|
|
|
+ 16.3 |
|
|
|
3,961 |
|
|
|
4,067 |
|
|
|
+ 2.7 |
|
|
|
+ 1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Care |
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
1,019 |
|
|
|
+ 154.1 |
|
|
|
+ 153.5 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
+ 8.0 |
|
|
|
+ 7.7 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
+ 93.2 |
|
|
|
+ 85.4 |
|
|
|
1,336 |
|
|
|
2,355 |
|
|
|
+ 76.3 |
|
|
|
+ 75.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diabetes Care, Diagnostics |
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
848 |
|
|
|
+ 8.0 |
|
|
|
+ 8.0 |
|
|
|
824 |
|
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
+ 8.4 |
|
|
|
+ 7.6 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
+ 11.2 |
|
|
|
+ 10.3 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
+ 13.7 |
|
|
|
+ 8.6 |
|
|
|
1,975 |
|
|
|
2,151 |
|
|
|
+ 8.9 |
|
|
|
+ 8.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Animal Health |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
+ 2.9 |
|
|
|
+ 2.7 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
+ 6.4 |
|
|
|
+ 6.3 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
+ 17.5 |
|
|
|
+ 14.0 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
+ 18.3 |
|
|
|
+ 11.1 |
|
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
+ 8.9 |
|
|
|
+ 7.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer CropScience |
|
|
2,238 |
|
|
|
2,241 |
|
|
|
+ 0.1 |
|
|
|
- 0.5 |
|
|
|
1,412 |
|
|
|
1,528 |
|
|
|
+ 8.2 |
|
|
|
+ 7.1 |
|
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
933 |
|
|
|
+ 0.6 |
|
|
|
- 0.5 |
|
|
|
1,369 |
|
|
|
1,194 |
|
|
|
- 12.8 |
|
|
|
- 20.0 |
|
|
|
5,946 |
|
|
|
5,896 |
|
|
|
- 0.8 |
|
|
|
- 3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crop Protection |
|
|
1,898 |
|
|
|
1,901 |
|
|
|
+ 0.2 |
|
|
|
- 0.6 |
|
|
|
979 |
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
+ 9.9 |
|
|
|
+ 8.8 |
|
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
811 |
|
|
|
- 1.1 |
|
|
|
- 2.3 |
|
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
|
- 13.8 |
|
|
|
- 21.2 |
|
|
|
4,957 |
|
|
|
4,874 |
|
|
|
- 1.7 |
|
|
|
- 4.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental Science, BioScience |
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
+ 0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
+ 4.4 |
|
|
|
+ 3.3 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
+ 14.0 |
|
|
|
+ 12.6 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
- 0.9 |
|
|
|
- 6.5 |
|
|
|
989 |
|
|
|
1,022 |
|
|
|
+ 3.3 |
|
|
|
+ 2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer MaterialScience |
|
|
3,876 |
|
|
|
4,732 |
|
|
|
+ 22.1 |
|
|
|
+ 22.1 |
|
|
|
2,186 |
|
|
|
2,792 |
|
|
|
+ 27.7 |
|
|
|
+ 27.2 |
|
|
|
1,769 |
|
|
|
2,143 |
|
|
|
+ 21.1 |
|
|
|
+ 20.8 |
|
|
|
766 |
|
|
|
1,028 |
|
|
|
+ 34.2 |
|
|
|
+ 29.9 |
|
|
|
8,597 |
|
|
|
10,695 |
|
|
|
+ 24.4 |
|
|
|
+ 23.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Materials |
|
|
1,382 |
|
|
|
1,697 |
|
|
|
+ 22.8 |
|
|
|
+ 22.9 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
+ 28.2 |
|
|
|
+ 27.8 |
|
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
1,164 |
|
|
|
+ 22.9 |
|
|
|
+ 22.6 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
+ 50.0 |
|
|
|
+ 47.7 |
|
|
|
3,248 |
|
|
|
4,086 |
|
|
|
+ 25.8 |
|
|
|
+ 25.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Systems |
|
|
2,494 |
|
|
|
3,035 |
|
|
|
+ 21.7 |
|
|
|
+ 21.7 |
|
|
|
1,483 |
|
|
|
1,891 |
|
|
|
+ 27.5 |
|
|
|
+ 27.1 |
|
|
|
822 |
|
|
|
979 |
|
|
|
+ 19.1 |
|
|
|
+ 18.3 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
+ 28.0 |
|
|
|
+ 22.7 |
|
|
|
5,349 |
|
|
|
6,609 |
|
|
|
+ 23.6 |
|
|
|
+ 22.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total regions (incl. reconciliation) |
|
|
9,775 |
|
|
|
11,930 |
|
|
|
+ 22.0 |
|
|
|
+ 21.9 |
|
|
|
6,512 |
|
|
|
7,340 |
|
|
|
+ 12.7 |
|
|
|
+ 11.9 |
|
|
|
3,962 |
|
|
|
4,578 |
|
|
|
+ 15.5 |
|
|
|
+ 14.8 |
|
|
|
3,029 |
|
|
|
3,535 |
|
|
|
+ 16.7 |
|
|
|
+ 10.4 |
|
|
|
23,278 |
|
|
|
27,383 |
|
|
|
+ 17.6 |
|
|
|
+ 16.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Management Report 27 |
Value Management
Our goal is to steadily increase Bayers
enterprise value and generate high
value-added for the benefit of our
stockholders, our employees and society as a
whole. The basis for this value creation is
innovation, growth and improved
profitability.
WERNER WENNING, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF MANAGEMENT OF BAYER AG
CVA-based system
One of the prime objectives of the Bayer
Group is to
sustainably increase enterprise value.
In 1994 we became one of the first German
companies to embark on the development of a
value management system, which we introduced
throughout the Group in 1997. The system is
used for the planning, controlling and
monitoring of our businesses. Our basic
controlling parameter is the cash value added
(CVA), which indicates the degree to which
the cash flows needed to cover the costs of
equity and debt and of reproducing depletable
assets have been generated. If the CVA is
positive, the company or business
entity concerned has created additional
value. If it is negative, the anticipated
capital and asset reproduction costs have not
been earned. Gross cash flow (GCF) and CVA
are profitability indicators for a single
reporting period. For a year-on-year
comparison we therefore use the delta CVA,
which is the difference between the CVAs
of two consecutive periods. A positive
delta CVA shows that value creation has
increased from one period to the next.
Calculating the cost of capital
Bayer calculates the cost of capital
according to the debt/equity ratio by the
weighted average cost of capital (WACC)
formula. The return expected by our
stockholders is computed from capital market
information. The cost of debt used in
calculating WACC is based on the terms for a
ten-year corporate bond issue.
To take into account the different risk and
return profiles of our principal businesses,
we calculate the cost of capital after taxes
for each of our subgroups. In 2005 this was
8.0 percent for Bayer HealthCare, 6.5 percent
for Bayer CropScience
|
|
|
28 Management Report
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
and 6.0 percent for Bayer MaterialScience.
The minimum return required for the Bayer
Group as a whole was 7.0 percent.
Gross cash flow, cash flow return on investment, and cash value added as performance yardsticks
The GCF, as published in our cash flow
statement, is the measure of our internal
financing capability. Bayer has chosen this
parameter because it is relatively free of
accounting influences and thus a more
meaningful performance indicator.
The profitability of the Group and of its
individual business entities is measured by
the cash flow return on investment (CFROI).
This is the ratio of the GCF to the capital
invested (CI). The CI can be derived from the
balance sheet and basically comprises the
property, plant and equipment and intangible
assets required for operations stated at
cost of acquisition or construction plus
working capital, less interest-free
liabilities (such as short-term provisions).
To allow for fluctuations during the year,
the CFROI is computed on the basis of the
average CI for the respective year.
Taking into account the costs of capital and
of reproducing depletable assets, we
determine the GCF hurdle. If the GCF hurdle is equaled or
exceeded, the required return on equity and
debt plus the cost of asset reproduction has
been earned. The CFROI hurdle for 2005 was
9.7 percent, while the corresponding GCF
hurdle was 2,654 million.
Actual GCF came in at 3,477 million,
exceeding the hurdle by 31 percent. Thus in
2005 we earned our entire capital and asset
reproduction costs, and the positive CVA of
823 million shows we created additional
value. Given the previous years CVA of 187
million, the Bayer Group therefore achieved a
delta CVA of 636 million, which means we
improved value creation by this amount in
2005 compared to 2004.
With an acquisition-related increase in
capital invested but an even larger
percentage rise in GCF, the CFROI increased
from 10.8 percent in 2004 to 12.4 percent in
2005 and thus was at the record level of the
year 2000.
All the subgroups exceeded their target
returns including asset reproduction, with
CropScience improving from 10.9 to 11.2
percent and MaterialScience from 10.3 to
16.4 percent. The figure for HealthCare
declined from 17.3 in the previous year to
14.9 percent due to the acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HealthCare |
|
|
CropScience |
|
|
MaterialScience |
|
|
Bayer Group |
|
Value Management Indicators by Subgroup |
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cash flow hurdle |
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
935 |
|
|
|
836 |
|
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
2.698 |
|
|
|
2.654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cash flow* |
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
1,402 |
|
|
|
2,885 |
|
|
|
3,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash value added |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow return on investment |
|
|
17.3 |
% |
|
|
14.9 |
% |
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
16.4 |
% |
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
12.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average capital invested |
|
|
5,447 |
|
|
|
7,635 |
|
|
|
8,209 |
|
|
|
8,618 |
|
|
|
8,549 |
|
|
|
8,553 |
|
|
|
26,695 |
|
|
|
28,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 figures restated |
|
* |
|
for definition see Bayer Group Key Data on front flap |
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Management Report 29 |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net cash provided by operating activities (Net cash flow)
Our gratifying business performance in
2005 led to a considerable improvement in
gross cash flow. Despite substantially higher
pre-tax earnings, income tax payments were
only slightly above the previous year, partly
due to utilization of loss carryforwards.
The gains from the changes in our company
pension plans in the United States and
Germany were non-cash items. Gross cash flow
improved by 20.5 percent to 3,477 million,
from 2,885 million in the previous year.
Net cash flow from continuing operations
climbed by 56.6 percent to 3,542 million
(2004: 2,262 million). All of the subgroups
posted significant year-on-year growth in
cash flow.
Net cash of 40 million was used in
operating activities of discontinued
operations, including inflows and outflows
from the divested plasma business and
LANXESS. Total net cash flow thus amounted to
3,502 million (2004: 2,450 million).
Net cash used in investing activities
There was a net cash outflow of 1,741
million for investing activities, compared to
814 million in the previous year.
Disbursements for acquisitions amounted to
2,188 million, including about 1.9 billion
for the consumer health business of Roche, an
initial payment of roughly 200 million
having been made in this connection at the
end of 2004. This global business has been
part of the Consumer Care Division of Bayer
HealthCare, except in Japan, since January 1,
2005. Further disbursements related mainly to
the purchase of marketing rights in
connection with a license agreement and a
co-marketing and distribution
agreement in the CropScience and HealthCare
subgroups, respectively. Capital expenditures
for property, plant, equipment and for other
intangible assets came to 1,389 million
(2004: 1,251 million).
Receipts related to investments came to
1,189 million. This figure primarily
included the scheduled repayment of loans
following the spin-off of LANXESS,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Group Summary Cash Flow Statements |
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cash flow* |
|
|
2,885 |
|
|
|
3,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in working capital/other non-cash items |
|
|
(623 |
) |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (net cash flow from continuing operations) |
|
|
2,262 |
|
|
|
3,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (net cash flow from discontinued operations) |
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (net cash flow, total) |
|
|
2,450 |
|
|
|
3,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities (total) |
|
|
(814 |
) |
|
|
(1,741 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities (total) |
|
|
(761 |
) |
|
|
(1,881 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents due to business activities |
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
2,734 |
|
|
|
3,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change due to exchange rate movements and to changes in scope of consolidation |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
|
3,570 |
|
|
|
3,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities and other instruments |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquid assets as per balance sheets |
|
|
3,599 |
|
|
|
3,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 figures restated |
|
* |
|
for definition see Bayer Group Key Data on front flap |
|
|
|
30 Management Report
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
the expiration of currency-hedging
derivatives and the sale of the LANXESS
convertible bond with a nominal volume of
200 million. Receipts from sales of
property, plant and equipment totaled 398
million, including approximately 230 million
from the divestment of the plasma business in
the first quarter of 2005.
Net cash used in financing activities
The net cash outflow of 1,881 million (2004:
761 million) for financing activities
included 440 million in dividend payments,
787 million in interest payments and 654
million in net repayments of borrowings. In
the third quarter, taking advantage of
favorable market conditions, we successfully
placed a subordinated 100-year hybrid bond in
the nominal amount of 1.3 billion, bearing a
5 percent coupon. At the same time, part of
the 5.375 percent Eurobond due on April 10,
2007 was repurchased early. The repurchased
volume had a face value of approximately 860
million. The increase in interest paid was
primarily due to one-time charges of 56
million incurred on this transaction.
Including marketable securities and
other instruments, the Group had liquid
assets of 3,523 million on December 31,
2005. This total includes an amount of 253
million that was deposited in escrow accounts
to be used exclusively for payments relating
to antitrust fines and civil law settlements.
(See Note [35] to the financial statements on
page 179 ff.). In view of the restriction on
its use, the 253 million liquidity in these
escrow accounts was not deducted when
calculating net debt.
Net debt
The noncurrent financial liabilities
include the 100-year hybrid bond issued in
2005. In comput-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Debt |
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent financial liabilities as per balance sheets (including derivatives) |
|
|
7,025 |
|
|
|
7,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current financial liabilities as per balance sheets (including derivatives) |
|
|
2,166 |
|
|
|
1,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative receivables |
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities from continuing operations |
|
|
8,490 |
|
|
|
8,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquid assets as per balance sheets less amount not freely available |
|
|
3,599 |
|
|
|
3,270 |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt from continuing operations |
|
|
4,891 |
|
|
|
5,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt from discontinued operations |
|
|
531 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net debt |
|
|
5,422 |
|
|
|
5,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
3,270 million = 3,523 million 253 million |
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Management Report 31 |
ing debt indicators, rating agencies
generally only apportion part of this type of
bond to financial liabilities (e.g. Moodys:
25 percent) and allocate the remainder to
stockholders equity. This bond thus supports
the Groups rating-specific debt indicators.
The Roche OTC acquisition was financed out of
existing liquidity without additional
borrowing. The cash disbursement therefore
led to a substantial short-term increase in
net debt. This was largely offset, chiefly by
our operating cash flow, the proceeds of loan
repayments and assumptions of debt by
LANXESS, reducing net debt to below 5.5
billion by December 31, 2005.
Financial strategy
The financial management of the Bayer Group
is conducted by the management holding
company Bayer AG. Finance is a global
resource, generally procured centrally and
distributed within the Group. The
foremost objectives of our financial
management are to ensure sufficient liquidity
and help bring about a sustained increase in
corporate value. With these goals in mind we
aim to optimize our capital structure, manage
risks effectively and reduce financing costs.
Standard & Poors currently gives Bayer
a long-term A rating, while Moodys rates us
at A3. The short-term ratings are A-1
(Standard & Poors) and P-2 (Moodys). Our
financial strategy is geared toward
maintaining a credit rating that reflects
high solvency.
We generally pursue a prudent debt management
strategy aimed at ensuring flexibility. We
consider it important to draw on a balanced
mix of capital resources to finance our
activities. Chief among these resources in
keeping with our requirements are a
syndicated credit facility, a multi-currency
commercial paper program and a multi-currency
Euro Medium Term Note program. We also
supplement our financing with various
structured products, such as an asset-backed
securities program.
The situation on the international financial
markets of relevance to the Bayer Group was
again positive in 2005. We took advantage of
this favorable market environment to
considerably improve the conditions of our
syndicated credit line. We do not expect this
positive market environment to change
significantly in the short term.
We use financial derivatives to hedge against
risks arising from business operations or
related financial transactions, but do not
employ contracts in the absence of an
underlying transaction. It is our policy to
diminish the default risk by selecting
trading partners with a high credit standing.
We closely monitor the execution of all
transactions, which are conducted according
to Group-wide guidelines.
Further details of our risk management
objectives and the ways in which we hedge all
the major types of transaction to which hedge
accounting is applied, along with procurement
market, credit, liquidity and cash flow
risks, as they relate to our use of financial
instruments, are given in Note [33] to the
financial statements on page 173 ff.
|
|
|
32 Management Report
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Earnings Performance
Net sales of the Bayer Group
increased by 17.6 percent, or 4,105 million,
from the previous year to
27,383 million. In local currencies and
adjusted for portfolio effects, sales
rose by 7.5 percent.
The cost of goods sold increased by 21.0
percent to 15.0 billion, mainly as a result
of the growth in business but also due to
higher raw material costs. The ratio of the
cost of goods sold to total net sales was
54.9 percent, compared with 53.4 percent in
the previous year. To support our growth
strategy we increased selling expenses,
mainly at HealthCare and MaterialScience, by
9.0 percent overall to 5.7 billion. Reasons
for the increase in the negative balance of
other operating income and expenses included
expenses related to settlements of antitrust
proceedings in the polymers field, and legal
and defense costs for product liability suits
in HealthCare. These charges were partially
offset by gains from changes to our pension
systems in the United States and Germany.
EBIT in 2005 amounted to 2,812 million.
Before net special charges of 488 million
(2004: 242 million), EBIT climbed by 55.9
percent to 3,300 million.
The non-operating result improved by 40
million to minus 613 million. Net expense
from investments in affiliated companies
declined significantly, while net interest
expense rose, due particularly to the
acquisition-related increase in net debt at
the beginning of the year.
Income taxes for continuing operations
in 2005 came to 641 million (2004: 473
million). While the higher tax expense was
due to the improvement in earnings, the
effective tax rate declined to 29.1 percent,
from 38.7 percent in the prior year.
Including the result of discontinued
operations, Group net income in 2005 improved
by 912 million to 1,597 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Group Summary Income Statements |
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Net sales |
|
|
23,278 |
|
|
|
27,383 |
|
|
|
+ 17.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
(12,421 |
) |
|
|
(15,027 |
) |
|
|
+ 21.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling expenses |
|
|
(5,240 |
) |
|
|
(5,713 |
) |
|
|
+ 9.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
(1,927 |
) |
|
|
(1,886 |
) |
|
|
- 2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General administration expenses |
|
|
(1,421 |
) |
|
|
(1,444 |
) |
|
|
+ 1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income and expenses net |
|
|
(394 |
) |
|
|
(501 |
) |
|
|
+ 27.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating result [EBIT] |
|
|
1,875 |
|
|
|
2,812 |
|
|
|
+ 50.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating result |
|
|
(653 |
) |
|
|
(613 |
) |
|
|
- 6.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
1,222 |
|
|
|
2,199 |
|
|
|
+ 80.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(473 |
) |
|
|
(641 |
) |
|
|
+ 35.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income after taxes |
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
1,595 |
|
|
|
+ 133.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which attributable to minority interest |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
- 33.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which attributable to Bayer AG stockholders (net income) |
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
+ 133.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Management Report 33 |
Asset and Capital Structure
Total assets decreased by 0.9 billion
from the end of the previous year, to 36.7
billion, mainly because of the spin-off of
LANXESS. Assets of our continuing operations
increased by 3.9 billion compared to the end
of 2004, chiefly due to the acquisition of
the Roche OTC business and to currency
translation effects. The goodwill and other
intangible assets reflected in noncurrent
assets rose by 1.7 billion overall. Of this
amount, brands acquired as a result of the
Roche otc acquisition, such as
Aleve®, Bepanthen®,
Redoxon®, Rennie® and
Supradyn®, accounted for about
1.1 billion, and goodwill for 0.6 billion.
Current assets showed a slight 3.9 percent
increase, due primarily to the
currency-related and thus non-cash
increase in inventories and receivables.
Stockholders equity expanded by 0.2 billion to
11.2 billion. The spin-off of LANXESS early
in the year resulted in a reduction of
1.1 billion, while
the dividend payment diminished
stockholders equity by 0.4 billion and the
change in pension provisions, which did not
affect the income statement, led to a 0.7
billion decline. Group net income came to
1.6 billion, while positive currency effects
added 0.9 billion to stockholders equity.
Equity coverage of total assets for 2005 thus
came to 30.4 percent on December 31, 2005
(2004: 29.1 percent).
Liabilities from continuing operations
grew by 1.3 billion compared to December 31,
2004, to 25.6 billion, the largest factor
here being the 1.0 billion increase in
pension provisions. The changes in actuarial
losses in 2005 (IAS 19 revised) accounted for
1.3 billion. These losses were due mainly to
the decrease in the interest rates used for
discounting purposes in 2005. Current
liabilities rose by
0.1 billion, or 1.2 percent. While total
financial liabilities declined, there were
increases in the other provisions and in
trade accounts payable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Group Summary Balance Sheets |
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Noncurrent assets |
|
|
16,859 |
|
|
|
20,130 |
|
|
|
+ 19.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
15,972 |
|
|
|
16,592 |
|
|
|
+ 3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held for sale and discontinued operations |
|
|
4,757 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
20,729 |
|
|
|
16,592 |
|
|
|
- 20,0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
37,588 |
|
|
|
36,722 |
|
|
|
- 2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
10,943 |
|
|
|
11,157 |
|
|
|
+ 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
15,295 |
|
|
|
16,495 |
|
|
|
+ 7.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
8,963 |
|
|
|
9,070 |
|
|
|
+ 1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities directly related to assets held for sale
and discontinued operations |
|
|
2,387 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
11,350 |
|
|
|
9,070 |
|
|
|
- 20,1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity and liabilities |
|
|
37,588 |
|
|
|
36,722 |
|
|
|
- 2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 Management Report
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Ratios and Financial Indicators |
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
( |
%) |
|
|
53.4 |
|
|
|
54.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R&D expenses |
|
|
( |
%) |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating result (EBIT) |
|
|
( |
%) |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant, equipment and intangible assets |
|
|
( |
%) |
|
|
41.5 |
|
|
|
43.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
( |
%) |
|
|
197.9 |
|
|
|
126.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
( |
%) |
|
|
36.9 |
|
|
|
35.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and interest expense |
|
|
( |
%) |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income after taxes* |
|
|
( |
%) |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average stockholders equity* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity* |
|
|
( |
%) |
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
30.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 figures restated |
|
* continuing and discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Management Report 35 |
Proposal for Distribution of the Profit
Under German law, the dividend payment is based on the balance sheet profit of the parent
company, which amounted to 694 million in 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer AG Summary Income Statements |
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administration expenses |
|
|
(189 |
) |
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
operating income and expenses net |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating result |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating result |
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decline in assets due to the spin-off |
|
|
(836 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation from retained earnings |
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet profit |
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We will propose to the Annual Stockholders Meeting on April 28, 2006 that the balance
sheet profit be used to pay a dividend of 0.95 per share (730,341,920 shares) on the capital
stock of 1.9 billion entitled to the dividend for 2005.
Employees
On December 31, 2005 there were
37,600 employees in the Bayer Group in
Germany and 93,700 worldwide. When the
spin-off of LANXESS is taken into account,
this was 2,000 more than at the beginning of
the year. The average number of employees, at
about 93,000, was above the 2004 level. A
breakdown of employees by segment and region
is provided in the notes to the financial
statements on page 84 ff. Personnel expenses
decreased by 1.9 percent in 2005 to 5,912
million, equivalent to 21.6 percent of sales.
The value added per employee increased to
102,487.
The total number of employees rose once
again, particularly in the Asia-Pacific and
Latin America regions, and our personnel
structure improved
through new hirings. At our German sites
alone, about 200 university graduates were
given jobs in 2005, while a further 1,000
young people entered company-sponsored
vocational training programs and some 600
trainees were given full-time positions.
In 2005 our human resources policy
focused on measures designed to enhance and
make full use of the performance potential of
our employees. We received awards in several
countries for our numerous programs and
activities aimed at helping employees
reconcile family and career demands,
motivating the workforce, improving human
resources development, recruiting new talent
and retaining employees within our company.
For ex-
|
|
|
36 Management Report
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
ample, our companies in Argentina, Australia,
New Zealand and Belgium were listed among the
top employers in those countries by respected
financial magazines and human resources
consultants. In the United States, Bayer in
2005 was named one of the best employers for
working mothers for the third time. And in
Austria, the Federal Ministry of Economics
and Labor presented us with the national
Knewledge 2005 prize, which is awarded to
companies for outstanding achievements in
human resources development and advancement.
At the beginning of 2006, the German Minister
for Labor and Social Affairs awarded Bayer
the Shaping Employment Companies
Demonstrate Responsibility award in the
category Prospects for Young People in
recognition of the companys commitment to
vocational training. The jury singled out
Bayer for the award because of its special
program to prepare socially and educationally
disadvantaged young people for vocational
training courses.
We renewed our range of social benefits in
2005 and adapted them to current
requirements. These benefits include
counseling offers that are available to our
employees in Germany and the United States
for dealing with personal and job-related
problems, preventive health care programs and
a company pension plan that we offer to our
employees in nearly every country in which we
operate.
In shaping our company pension plans, we
take account of both social responsibility
aspects and the distribution of risk. We have
therefore pursued the successive conversion
of our global pension plans from defined
benefit to defined contribution systems.
This process reached a preliminary conclusion
in 2005 with conversion of the systems in the
United States, Canada and Brazil. In Germany,
too, we correspondingly adjusted components
of our pension systems.
During the reporting period we further
developed our variable income component
systems based on corporate performance a
core component of our remuneration policy
and harmonized these systems internationally.
The budget for these is now dependent on the
attainment of economic targets at all levels.
Non-earnings-based one-time payments were
consistently scaled back.
We also restructured the stock-based programs
for our employees in 2005. With the launch
last year of a new program named Aspire, we
introduced a uniform Group-wide system for
the executive management level. Under this
program, participants can receive cash
payments based on the performance of Bayer
stock over a three-year period.
At the European level, the employees
representatives met with Group management at
the 14th Bayer European Forum to continue
their cross-border information exchange and
consultation process.
Accompanied by numerous measures around the
world throughout 2005, we made our mission
statement Bayer: Science For A Better Life
the benchmark for our entrepreneurial
activities. The values enshrined in the
mission statement and the leadership
principles derived from them have been
integrated into our daily operations.
In October 2005 we once again conducted
a survey of our managerial staff in which
more than 10,000 managerial employees in all
countries participated. The survey found that
the mood within the company had once again
improved significantly over the previous
year and a half.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Management Report 37 |
Procurement and Distribution
Bayer HealthCare
The Pharmaceuticals Division generally
procures the raw materials for manufacturing
the active ingredients of its prescription
medicines from external suppliers. We hold
strategic reserves to prevent supply
bottlenecks and possible dependence on
suppliers. We mitigate major price
fluctuations by purchasing the intermediates
required to manufacture our principal active
ingredients from several suppliers on the
basis of
global contracts. The active ingredients
of our prescription medicines are currently
manufactured almost entirely in Wuppertal,
Germany, for Bayer production facilities
worldwide. Our most important pharmaceutical
production plants are located in Leverkusen,
Germany; Berkeley, California, United States;
Garbagnate and Rosia, Italy; and Shiga,
Japan. Our products are primarily distributed
through wholesalers, pharmacies and
hospitals.
Since we actively compete with other
drug suppliers worldwide, we seek to
reinforce our external distribution network
with co-promotion and co-marketing
arrangements. In September 2004 we entered
into a strategic alliance with
Schering-Plough under which that company
distributes our primary care products in the
United States. At the same time, we market
cancer drugs from Schering-Plough in selected
countries. Bayer and Schering-Plough also
plan to jointly market Schering-Ploughs
product Zetia® in Japan, where it
is currently involved in the registration
process. In October 2005 we signed a
strategic cooperation agreement with Johnson
& Johnson under the terms of which Johnson &
Johnson is supporting the development of our
antithrombotic drug BAY 59-7939. It is
intended that Johnson & Johnson market the
newly developed drug in the United States at
a later date. Furthermore, Bayer and Johnson
& Johnson will jointly market Johnson &
Johnsons urology drug Elmiron® in
the United States.
The activities of our Consumer Care Division
are focused on over-the-counter medicines
that patients can generally purchase without
a prescription. Consumer Care procures
extensive volumes of certain raw materials
from within the Bayer Group. The most
important raw materials that we buy in bulk
from third parties are ascorbic acid, citric
acid, paracetamol, sodium citrate and
tartaric acid. These are generally readily
available. To minimize business risks, we
diversify our raw material procurement
sources worldwide and conclude long-term
supply agreements. The divisions sales and
distribution channels outside Europe are
typically supermarket chains, drugstores and
other wholesalers. In Europe, pharmacies are
the primary distribution channel.
The Diagnostics Division manufactures or
assembles most of its products itself. We
operate a supplier management process and
procure raw materials, components and
finished products on an OEM (original equipment
manufacturer) basis. The materials we
purchase directly are generally not subject
to significant fluctuations in price or
availability. Our diagnostic systems are
marketed directly to reference laboratories,
private laboratories and hospitals, as well
as through a network of distribution
companies.
The sole production facility in the
Diabetes Care Division is located in
Mishawaka, Indiana, United States. About one
third of products are manufactured
or assembled directly by Bayer, while
the rest are procured from OEM suppliers. The
delivery of raw materials, components and
finished products is based on a supplier
management process. Access to most of the
materials is thus safeguarded through
contractual agreements, and they are
therefore not subject to major fluctuations
in price or availability. Delivery
bottlenecks for some direct or OEM materials
would have negative consequences for the
earnings performance of Diabe-
|
|
|
38 Management Report
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
tes Care. These items include
customer-specific, integrated circuits and
sensors for producing the
Ascensia® blood glucose
measurement system. We therefore hold
strategic reserves of certain direct
materials or finished products in order to
be able to supply our customers consistently
and reliably. Furthermore, we maintain a
global supplier network. Our Diabetes Care
products are marketed to consumers through
distribution companies and large drugstore
and retail chains.
The Animal Health Division procures
pharmaceutical ingredients for its veterinary
medicines both from within the Bayer Group
and from external suppliers throughout the
world. Depending on local regulatory
frameworks, animal health products may be
available to end users over the counter or
with a prescription issued by a veterinarian.
Bayer CropScience
Crop Protection procures most of its raw
materials from external companies. The cost
of some raw materials depends on fluctuating
oil and energy prices and freight charges. As
most of our sales are generated in the
northern hemisphere, the business depends
especially on the growing seasons for the
relevant crops and the respective
distribution cycles. The products of Crop
Protection are marketed either to wholesalers
or directly to retailers through a two- or
three-tier distribution system, according to
local market conditions.
Our Environmental Science Business Group
markets its products to both professional
users and amateur gardeners through various
distribution channels. Our green industry,
pest control and barn hygiene products are
marketed directly to professional users,
while home and garden products are sold
through specialist dealers.
BioScience makes its seed products
available to end users, distributors and
processing industries. Traits developed using
plant biotechnology are either outlicensed to
other seed companies for use in their
products or sold through our own seed
companies. Important brands here include
InVigor® and FiberMax®.
In some cases we make plant traits available
to other companies for use in their own
research and products.
Bayer MaterialScience
The Polycarbonates Business Unit of Bayer
MaterialScience sells its products primarily
to injection molding and extrusion processors
for the manufacture of plastics components
used predominantly in the automotive,
electronics, construction, data systems,
medical equipment and leisure sectors. The
key petrochemical raw materials used by our
Polycarbonates business unit are acetone and
phenol. With raw material costs affected
mainly by the volatility of oil and benzene
prices, we generally conclude long-term
supply agreements containing cost-based and
market-price-oriented adjustment formulas.
Our products are marketed chiefly through
regional distribution channels. We also use
trading houses and sell to smaller customers
through local distributors.
The activities of Wolff Walsrode focus on
building materials, industrial coatings,
printing inks for soft packaging, and the
health care market. In Germany and the United
States, Wolff Walsrode normally sells its
cellulose products directly. Elsewhere,
products are marketed through Bayers global
sales organization. The principal raw
material for our cellulose derivatives is
chemical-grade cellulose produced from raw
cellulose and cotton. We regard our
procurement risk for this material as low.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Management Report 39 |
H.C. Starck supplies materials and
components for the electronics, optics,
aviation, aerospace and medical technology
industries. As we operate our own tungsten
recycling facilities, we are only partially
dependent on Chinese imports. The supply of
raw materials is covered by long-term
agreements which mostly run for three to five years. H.C. Starck maintains its own
international sales organizations and liaison
offices worldwide. This subsidiary also
makes use of other sales organizations that
are responsible for maintaining direct
contact with customers. For example,
Ampere® products are jointly
marketed with Dutch-based Flame Spray
Technologies.
The polyurethane products of the
Polyurethanes business unit, which are based
on isocyanate-polyol systems, are used in the
automotive, construction, electronics and
furniture industries and in leisure articles.
The primary raw materials are petrochemical
feedstocks, which we mostly procure on the
open market through long-term agreements. A
global joint
venture with Lyondell provides a supply
source for propylene oxide, one of our most
important raw materials. These petrochemical
feedstocks are subject to price fluctuations
on the crude oil and derivatives markets. We
mostly sell our isocyanate and polyol
products directly to customers. Europe, the
NAFTA countries and Asia are the primary
markets for our polyurethanes business, with
the Asian market continuing to show the
highest growth rates.
Our Coatings, Adhesives, Sealants
business unit is a leading manufacturer of
raw materials for coatings and adhesives used
primarily in the automotive, furniture,
plastics and construction industries.
Temporary fluctuations in prices for oil or
utilities, for example, can heavily impact
the cost of our raw materials. For this
reason, supplies of the principal chemical
raw materials are secured through long-term
agreements. Bulk customers with global
operations are serviced directly by our key
account managers.
Research and Development
In 2005 Bayer invested a total of
1,886 million in research and development.
It is particularly important for us to
continuously optimize our product portfolio
and manufacturing processes, while at the
same time developing new products aimed at
strengthening our core businesses.
Research and Development
Expenses 2005
by subgroup in %
Other research focuses are enabling
technologies such as biotechnology and
nanotechnology, which offer enormous
potential for developing new products and
businesses.
For innovation projects in particular,
we depend on our network of collaborations
with leading universities, public-sector
research institutes and partner companies.
These collaborations allow the pooling of
expertise in order to rapidly translate new
ideas into successful products.
In order to further strengthen the
companys innovative power, Bayer has
launched a Group-wide innovation initiative
entitled Triple-i, which stands for
inspiration, ideas, innovation. This
long-term initiative is designed to encourage
Bayers employees around the world to put
forward creative ideas and suggestions that
can be utilized for the companys benefit
through a special innovation process that has
been put in place for this purpose.
Particular emphasis will be placed on
examining
|
|
|
40 Management Report
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
ideas and options that lie outside the
existing business areas of our subgroups or
at the interface between them.
Bayer HealthCare
In 2005, 954 million, or roughly 51
percent of the Bayer Groups research and
development budget, was spent by Bayer
HealthCare. With this investment, the
subgroup is laying the foundation in the
Pharmaceuticals, Consumer Care, Diagnostics,
Diabetes Care and Animal Health divisions for
the introduction of further innovative
products in expanding markets.
In connection with the realignment of
the Pharmaceuticals Division, we have
adjusted our global pharmaceutical research
and development activities to reflect
changing business conditions. This is reflected in the divisions modified research
and development structure with the newly
created units Global Active Substances
Research and Global Development. The purpose
of the realignment, which took effect in
January 2006, is to enable early evidence of
the efficacy of new medicines in humans
(proof of concept). Our global active
substances research is focused on oncology at
the site in West Haven, Connecticut, and on
cardiovascular disease at the research center
in Wuppertal, Germany. The research and
development facilities for the expansion of
our Kogenate® product line are
located at our site in Berkeley, California.
Bayer HealthCare has carved its
anti-infective research activities out of the
Pharmaceuticals Division and placed them into
a new company in which Santo Holding
(Deutschland) AG of Stuttgart, Germany, will
hold a majority interest and Bayer HealthCare
a minority interest of 12 percent. The
anti-infectives research activities are
expected to be fully independent by March
2006.
In addition to focusing on new active
substances, we have intensified
post-marketing research in the
Pharmaceuticals Division. We aim to expand
the applications spectrum of products that
are already on the market by identifying
additional indications and developing
improved formulations. A particularly good
example of this is the life cycle management
of our product Adalat®, which
contributed 659 million in sales in 2005
even after many years on the market.
Our development product BAY 59-7939, an
oral inhibitor of the blood coagulation
Factor Xa, is currently being investigated
for the prevention and therapy of
thromboembolic diseases, where there is a
clear medical need for improved treatment
options. In October 2005, Bayer HealthCare
and Johnson & Johnson subsidiary Ortho-McNeil
Pharmaceutical, Inc. concluded an agreement
to jointly develop BAY 59-7939. Phase III
trials for the prevention of venous
thromboembolism (VTE) after major orthopedic
surgery began in December 2005. Phase II trials
for acute VTE treatment and stroke prevention
in atrial fibrillation are currently
ongoing.
Our new cancer drug Nexavar®
(sorafenib) was approved by the U.S. Food and
Drug Administration in December 2005 for the
treatment of patients with advanced renal
cell carcinoma (RCC). Nexavar® is
based on a novel active ingredient developed
jointly with Onyx Pharmaceuticals Inc. that
is designed to inhibit tumor growth by
simultaneously blocking several
serine/threonine and receptor tyrosine
kinases in tumor cells. The drug also cuts
off the supply of blood to the tumor.
Nexavar® was shown in clinical
studies to double progression-free survival
in patients with advanced RCC. The product
has received orphan drug status in the
European Union from the Committee for Orphan
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
|
Management Report 41 |
Medicinal Products (COMP) of EMEA,
the European regulatory body. We have also
filed with EMEA for regulatory approval of
Nexavar® in the treatment of
advanced kidney cancer. To expand the
products spectrum of indications, we and
Onyx Pharmaceuticals launched phase III
trials in 2005 for patients with advanced
liver and skin cancer, as well as further
phase II studies for other tumor types.
Furthermore, in December 2005 we announced
the beginning of a phase III clinical trial
in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Our research and development efforts in
the Biological Products Division are centered
around strengthening and expanding our
recombinant Factor VIII product
Kogenate®. We have identified five new protein variants for potential
development of the next Kogenate®
generation whose optimization is expected to
be completed by the end of 2006. In addition,
we are currently evaluating technologies that
can also be used in the development of the
next generation of Kogenate®. In
this connection, Bayer HealthCare has signed
an exclusive, worldwide license agreement
with Dutch-based company Zilip-Pharma
concerning the development and marketing of a
new, longer-acting Kogenate®
formulation based on patented pegylated
liposome technology. In April 2005, Bayer
completed an Investigational New Drug filing with the FDA for a phase I clinical
study involving the new formulation.
In May 2005 we entered into a research
agreement with Asklepios Biopharmaceutical
concerning the evaluation of gene therapy for
the treatment of hemophilia B.
The continuous optimization of
Kogenate® also includes the
development of Kogenate®-FS with
Bio-Set®, a needle-free system for our
recombinant Factor VIII product that
minimizes the risk of needle-stick injuries.
The Bio-Set® system was launched
in the European Union in mid-2005. Bayer
received FDA approval for the product at the
end of the year, and Bio-Set® was
introduced to the U.S. market at the
beginning of 2006.
To strengthen our activities in the fields
of cardiovascular disease and hematology, we
signed two agreements effective January 2006.
One of these agreements concerns the
acquisition from GlaxoSmithKline of European
marketing rights for the antihypertensive
agent telmisartan (trade names:
Pritor® and
PritorPlus®). The other covers a
collaboration with Nuvelo for the development
and commercialization of that companys blood
clot dissolver alfimeprase. Following the
completion of ongoing phase III clinical
development and the products subsequent
registration, Bayer HealthCare will hold
marketing rights for alfimeprase outside
the United States. In January 2006 Nuvelo was
granted fast track status for alfimeprase
from the FDA.
Development activities of the Consumer
Care Division focus on the identification,
development and market introduction of
non-prescription products. Further
initiatives focus on the expansion of
indications to support existing brands and on
the reclassification of current
prescription medicines as over-the-counter
products. One example is the joint
development program with Bristol-Myers Squibb
for Pravachol® (pravastatin), the
goal of which is to register
Pravachol® in the United States as
an over-the-counter cholesterol-lowering
drug.
|
|
|
42 Management Report
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
R&D activities in the Diagnostics
Division concentrate on strengthening core
product lines for Laboratory Testing and Near
Patient Testing, and on expanding
nucleic-acid-based tests. Our product line
has been strengthened by the launch of the
Advia Centaur® CP Immunoassay
System in November 2005 and by the adaptation
and implementation of new diagnostic tests
for the indications infectious diseases and
oncology. Our product range in Near Patient
Testing was supplemented in mid-2005 by the
improvement of the DCA 2000+®
Analyzer diabetes management platform.
The expanded test menu for the Clinitek
Status® analyzer also helped to
strengthen this segment. Through a license
agreement signed with CIS Biotech Inc. in
September 2005, we secured development and
marketing rights for an automated assay for
stroke diagnosis. In addition, in November
2005 we acquired development rights from
Inverness Medical Innovations concerning the
development of new cardiovascular diagnostic
tests. We concluded a further agreement with
that company concerning the use of a
hybridoma cell line capable of producing
monoclonal antibodies against the envelope
protein of the Hepatitis B virus. We plan to
steadily expand our portfolio for both the
clinical diagnostics and molecular testing
markets.
In the Diabetes Care Division, we are
working to strengthen core product lines and
expand into market segments characterized by
strong growth and margins. We aim to achieve
this through the development of user-friendly
blood glucose measurement devices that meet
the individual needs of diabetic patients. We
are also investing in technologies designed
to enable continuous monitoring of blood
glucose levels and, in the longer term,
blood-free glucose monitoring. In this
connection we extended a license agreement
with Sontra Medical Corporation, whose
ultrasonic SonoPrep® technology
increases skin permeability and is thus
intended to obviate the need for blood
samples.
In the Animal Health Division, our
research efforts focus on antibiotics,
parasiticides and active ingredients to treat
non-infectious diseases such as liver
failure, cancer and congestive heart failure.
Our active ingredient pradofloxacin, which
is currently undergoing clinical development
for the antimicrobial treatment of dogs and
cats, has been submitted to the E.U.
regulatory authorities for registration. Also
undergoing the registration process are our
Baycox® parasiticide for use in
calves and Baytril® for
antimicrobial therapy in pigs.
Bayer CropScience
In 2005,
664 million
or about 35
percent of the Bayer Groups R&D budget
was spent at Bayer CropScience.
Crop Protection has at its disposal a global
network of research and development
facilities: these are located at Monheim
(corporate headquarters) and Frankfurt,
Germany; Lyon and Sophia Antipolis, France;
Stilwell, Kansas, and Raleigh, North
Carolina, in the United States; and Yuki
City, Japan.
While our crop protection research is
concentrated at certain sites, development
activities take place both in our central
facilities and in numerous field testing
stations around the world to ensure that
future products are tested under regional
climate conditions.
Our R&D efforts are geared toward the
identification and development of
innovative, safe and commercially sustainable
products in the area of crop protection.
Research activities encompass all
measures aimed at identifying new active
ingredients which could be developed into
insecticides, fungicides or herbicides. In
addition to conventional chemistry, biology
and biochemistry, we make use of modern
technologies such as genomics,
high-throughput
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Management Report 43 |
screening, bioinformatics and
combinatorial chemistry to identify new lead
structures. Cooperation agreements with
external research companies supplement our
own activities.
We actively expand the applications spectrum
of our products through continuous life cycle
management. This includes the development of
new formulations for active ingredients and
products already on the market so that they
can be used for other crops or to improve
their handling.
The following new active ingredients were
introduced to the market in 2004 and 2005 or
are expected to be launched in 2006, provided
they receive regulatory approval.
Fluoxastrobin is a systemic
broad-spectrum strobilurin for leaf
application with curative and protective
properties. Products containing fluoxastrobin are designed for spray
application (Fandango®) and seed
treatment (Bariton®,
Scenic®) in cereals, potatoes,
vegetables, peanuts and other crops.
Spiromesifen (Oberon®)
belongs to a new chemical class called
tetronic acids. Oberon® is a new
insecticide/mite control product for spray
application to control white flies, mites
and jumping plant lice, which affect annual
crops. Oberon® was developed for
global use in vegetables, fruit, cotton,
corn, beans, tea and certain ornamentals.
Ethiprole (Curbix® and
Kirappu®) belongs to the chemical
class called phenylpyrazoles. It is effective
against a large number of biting
and sucking insects such as thripses, stink
bugs, grasshoppers and aphids. The product is
used in rice, tea and fruit.
Fluopicolide (Infinito®)
belongs to a new chemical class called
acylpicolides. Products from this substance
class are used to treat oomycete diseases in
potatoes, vegetables and ornamental plants.
The new mechanism of action will enable
farmers to also control oomycete strains that
are already resistant to standard fungicides.
Active ingredients discovered by our crop
protection researchers are also tested and
evaluated by Environmental Science to
determine whether they have potential for
further development. We also test active
ingredients from external companies and
acquire them
should these tests prove positive.
Development projects include so-called
passive treatments (gels, baits), pest
control formulations, and new herbicide
products and fungicidal combinations for the
lawn care and ornamental plants sectors.
In 2005 we introduced to the market the
insecticide Allectus®
(imidacloprid) and the fungicide
Armada® (trifloxystrobin with
triadimefon) for green industry applications,
as well as the insecticide tablet K-O
Tab®1-2-3 (deltamethrin) for
impregnating mosquito nets. In 2006 we expect
to launch the insecticide Forbid®
(spiromesifen) for the green industry segment
and, in professional pest control,
Quickbayt® spray (imidacloprid) to
control flies.
|
|
|
|
|
New active ingredient |
|
Indication |
|
Status |
Fluoxastrobin
|
|
Fungicide
|
|
Market introduction 2004/2005* |
|
|
|
|
|
Spiromesifen
|
|
Insecticide
|
|
Market introduction 2004/2005* |
|
|
|
|
|
Ethiprole
|
|
Insecticide
|
|
Market introduction 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fluopicolide
|
|
Fungicide
|
|
Market introduction expected in 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 2004/2005 indicates that the new active ingredient was first registered in an important country at the end of 2004,
but that the first significant sales were registered in 2005. |
|
|
|
44 Management Report
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
In addition to conventional crop
protection research, Bayer CropScience also
conducts research in the BioScience Business
Group, which is active primarily in plant
biotechnology. The research and development
sites for this unit are located in Lyon,
France; Haelen, Netherlands; Ghent, Belgium;
and Potsdam, Germany.
R&D in the field of plant biotechnology
is mainly geared toward improving the
agronomic and qualitative properties of crops.
From the identification of a target gene to
the development of a plant, the technologies
employed for this purpose comprise all
relevant tools required to improve important
crops such as cotton, canola and rice for
producers and industry partners. Activities
range from research into novel agronomic
traits to the discovery of new plant-based
specialty products for the areas of nutrition,
health care and biomaterials. These include
plants with increased stress tolerance (to
resist drought conditions, for example),
health-promoting canola oils and renewable raw
materials for non-food products.
Our growth is supported by the
continuous introduction of new products. In
2005 we introduced four new cotton grades and
a new canola type; we expect to launch
additional new cotton grades in 2006.
Bayer MaterialScience
In 2005 Bayer MaterialScience spent 251
million, not including joint development
activities with customers, to further expand
its position as a technology leader and global
supplier of customized, high-quality materials
and systems solutions. This corresponds to 13
percent of the Groups research and
development expenses.
In the five Bayer MaterialScience
business units Polyurethanes;
Polycarbonates; Coatings, Adhesives,
Sealants; Thermoplastic Polyurethanes;
and Inorganic Basic Chemicals ultra-modern
technologies and production processes are
used to implement new products and
applications in close cooperation with our
external partners and customers.
The Polycarbonates business unit, for
example, is working to optimize the
melt-polycarbonate process at our new
facility in Caojing, China, which is being
equipped with ultra-modern production
technologies. An outstanding example of a new
product application is our diffuser sheets,
which ensure the even distribution of light
for rear illumination of LCD flat screens.
In the Polyurethanes business unit, we
are concentrating on steadily improving
existing manufacturing processes for aromatic
isocyanates and polyethers, as well as on
developing new products for new applications.
In the area of high-performance composites,
in which polyurethanes play a key role, we
have succeeded in developing a new
Baydur® formulation for exterior
body parts for large vehicles that is
superior to the currently used material in
terms of heat resistance and strength.
The Coatings, Adhesives, Sealants business
unit is another showcase for our innovative
capability. Its researchers are concentrating
on the development of polyurethane raw
materials for the formulation of high-grade
products. Raw materials for more
environmentally friendly low-solvent systems
are an important focus and include
thermoformable soft-feel coatings with a
velvety feel.
Innovation also plays an important role
at our subsidiaries Wolff Walsrode and H.C.
Starck. Research activities at Wolff Walsrode
aim at exploiting the unique structural and
chemical properties of cellulose and other
polysaccharides, which are important
renewable raw materials, in order to
manufacture a wide variety of products for
the
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Management Report 45 |
construction, food and pharmaceutical
industries, for example. New developments at
H.C. Starck include precursors and components
that Staxera, a 50:50 joint venture with
Webasto, uses to produce high-temperature
fuel cells for mobile applications such as
trucks and boats.
To exploit profitable fields of activity
for the future, the New Business section of
Bayer MaterialScience constantly tracks and
evaluates new technological and market
trends. The most promising ideas are
channeled into research and development
projects. These projects are then either
implemented in cooperation with the business
units or developed within independent
companies as part of the so-called greenhouse
concept. Here we place great emphasis on
global cooperation with universities, other
institutes and start-up companies. For
example, we have signed a joint development
agreement with InPhase Technologies
concerning holographic data storage media
with a capacity of up to 1.6 terabytes.
Bayer Technology Services
For engineering and technological
issues, particularly in the area of process
technology, all subgroups work closely
together with Bayer Technology Services. This
service company develops innovative
technology platforms for the Bayer Group,
helping the subgroups to sustain their
performance. These enabling technologies
shorten development times and support the
manufacture of new products, system solutions
and production processes in the subgroups.
A strategic core element in this connection
is international insourcing, which involves
the acquisition of know-how. This ranges from
country-specific expertise in the
implementation of capital expenditure
projects through the global exploitation of
innovations and public research funding to
the recruitment of top international experts
and
the establishment of collaborations with
other companies and research institutes. One
example is the acquisition of Zeptosens AG, a
spin-off of Novartis whose highly sensitive
biochip systems can considerably reduce
development times for the active substances
of Bayer HealthCare and Bayer CropScience.
Bayer Innovation
Responsibility for the development of
innovative products and new fields of
business outside of the subgroups existing
core activities lies with Bayer Innovation
GmbH (BIG). The goal of this company is to
add to Bayers business portfolio and
facilitate access to new growth markets. The
current focus is on medical technology, the
manufacture of certain pharmaceutical active
ingredients in plants, and
security technology.
One example of the targeted exploitation
of intradisciplinary synergies is medical
technology, where expertise in new materials
and active substances development, combined
with knowledge of human physiology and
diseases, is crucial in creating novel and
promising products. Such applications can
include chronic wound dressings made from
materials which contain pharmaceutical active
ingredients to help prevent infections, stop
undesirable cell growth and accelerate the
healing process.
big also consolidates Bayers activities
for producing specific pharmaceutical
substances in plants (plant-made
pharmaceuticals or PMPs). Building on
expertise from the BioScience Business Group,
this technology utilizes the natural protein
production process in plants to manufacture
therapeutically active substances. In this
connection, BIG in January 2006 acquired
biotech company Icon Genetics AG, which
provides a promising technology platform for
this application.
|
|
|
46 Management Report
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Sustainable Development
Linking innovation and values to sustainability
We steer sustainability within the Bayer
Group on the basis of our mission statement,
values and leadership principles. In 2005, we
again adapted to changing framework
conditions and new questions.
We strategically realigned our existing
committees for sustainable development and
for health, safety and environmental issues
in 2005, focusing
particularly on the adjustment of our
structures in Asia in order to adequately
accompany economic development in that region
and create scope for future perspectives. The
global Responsible Care initiative of the
chemical industry was actively embraced and
supported at our sites through a wide variety
of programs. In addition, we further refined our established HSEQ management systems.
The regular evaluation of these systems is
governed by a Group-wide audit guideline.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category |
|
Key Performance Indicator |
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Environment,
health and safety |
|
Health and safety
|
|
Industrial injuries to Bayer employees resulting in at least
one days absence (MAQ* value)
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable industrial injuries to Bayer employees
(MAQ* value)
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental or damage-causing incidents
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of transportation incidents
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emissions and solid waste
|
|
Emissions to the atmosphere |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Climate-relevant gases (million
metric tons CO2 equivalent per year)
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volatile organic compounds (thousand metric tons per year)
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Emissions into water |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total phosphorus (thousand metric tons per year)
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total organically bound carbon
(thousand metric tons per year)
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nitrogen (thousand metric tons per year)
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hazardous waste |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generated (million metric tons per year)
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Landfilled (million metric tons per year)
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resource consumption
|
|
Water consumption (million cubic meters per day)
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy consumption (petajoules [= 1015 joules] per year)
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees
and society |
|
Diversity and opportunity
|
|
Percentage of women in Bayer Group senior management
|
|
|
** |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of nationalities in Bayer Group senior management
|
|
|
** |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Training and development
|
|
Training and development expenses in percent of personnel expenses
|
|
|
** |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment |
|
Number of employees by region (permanent and temporary contracts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
51,400 |
|
|
|
52,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
17,800 |
|
|
|
16,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
12,200 |
|
|
|
13,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latin America/Africa/Middle East
|
|
|
10,300 |
|
|
|
11,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
MAQ = million-working-hour quota = number of injuries per million hours worked that resulted in at least one days absence |
|
** |
|
global data not collected prior to 2005 |
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Management Report 47 |
At the end of 2004, Bayer became an
Organizational Stakeholder of the Global
Reporting Initiative (GRI) established by the
United Nations. Here we participate in the
multi-stakeholder process aimed at
establishing globally accepted guidelines for
sustainability reporting. The focus in 2005
was on the G3 guideline revision process.
Furthermore, we continued to develop our
reporting and began annual publishing of our
global environmental and safety data on the
Internet in 2005. Our performance data for
the most important safety and environmental
issues, the so-called key performance
indicators (KPIs), were supplemented
by a
number of new aspects that now more
specifically describe our social
commitment. In this way we are responding to
the increased significance of corporate
social responsibility, as well as
illustrating the areas we consider to be
particularly important and that we use as
indicators for managing our corporate HSE
activities (see table at left).
During the reporting period, we further
improved or at least matched most of the
KPIs from the previous year. Only the
volume of waste classified as hazardous
increased as a result of temporary
renaturization and remediation activities.
It is important to us to participate in
the shaping of framework conditions. Bayer is
keenly involved in both national and
international debates on environmental and
consumer protection strategies and
regulations. We support the goals of a modern
chemicals policy for the European Union and
contribute to constructive solutions in this
area.
However, we need practicable and
target-oriented instruments to quickly and
effectively achieve better protection for
consumers and the environment and at the same
time ensure that companies remain
competitive. The competitiveness of European
industry must not be jeopardized by
overregulation.
We endorse the goals of the E.U. strategy for
improving health and the environment (SCALE),
which focuses particularly on childrens
health. However, it is essential that all
relevant influencing factors, and especially
genuine health problems, be taken into
account. The scientific assessment of risks
must remain the basis for decision-making,
and existing regulations should be kept in
mind.
Biotechnology and nanotechnology will
have a key impact on advances in science and
process engineering. We view them as
indispensable options for the development of
innovative products. In keeping with our
motto Bayer: Science For A Better Life,
these new technologies can be used to improve
the performance of existing products and open
up new markets. They also offer new
approaches for the conservation of resources
and for environmental protection. The
statements contained in our Guidelines for
Responsible Care in Environmental Protection,
Health Protection and Safety also apply to
the use of biotechnology and nanotechnology
at Bayer. This means in particular that
safety and environmental protection have the
same standing as quality and
cost-effectiveness.
Working for climate protection
Climate protection and operations based on
the conservation of resources are two themes
that have been particularly important to us
for many years. It is
not surprising, therefore, that we have
undertaken significant efforts to
continuously reduce direct emissions of
carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases at
all of our sites worldwide.
In 2005, the Carbon Disclosure Project
honored Bayers climate protection activities
over many years by including the company in
the Climate Leadership Index. This initiative
represents large institutional investors and
has the goal of influ-
|
|
|
48 Management Report
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
encing the impact that large enterprises have
on climate change through their activities.
Companies included in the Climate Leadership
Index are recognized as being better
positioned than other companies in the same
industry in terms of the financial effects
to which they will be subjected as climate
change progresses. In addition, Bayer
received the Low Carbon Leaders Award in
December 2005 at the international Climate
Summit in Montreal, Canada. The company was
rated Best in Class by an international
jury of experts appointed by The Climate
Group, a climate protection organization, and
made up of representatives from politics,
non-governmental organizations and industry.
Bayer was the only German company to receive
this highest accolade, which is presented to
only five companies in all. In the global
climate protection ranking, Bayer was rated
third.
At the European level we advocate an
emissions trading system that does justice
both to the interests of industry and the
need to protect the Earths climate. In this
connection, we propose that comparable
production facilities should be allocated the
same number of emission certificates in the
future and that allocation rules should be
harmonized throughout the European Union.
In the United States, Bayer is
voluntarily taking part in the four-year
emissions trading pilot project of the
Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX). We also plan
to participate in phase II of the CCX, which
runs through 2010.
To ensure continued commercial success in the
future, great emphasis will be placed on
linking the themes of innovation, values and
sustainability. Prior to major capital
expenditure decisions, for example, we
conduct systematic analyses of the effects
that products and processes will have on
the environment and health. In this
connection, we evaluate the production
process at the site and the products entire
life cycle, from manufacture through to
disposal. The same standards apply worldwide
for this procedure.
Sustainable investment
Sustainability is an increasingly
important criterion for investment decisions,
and Bayer stock is represented in relevant
indices. In 2005, for example, Bayer shares
were again listed in the Dow Jones
Sustainability World Index (DJSI World) and
the European Dow Jones STOXX Sustainability
Index (DJSI STOXX). Norwegian-based
Storebrand Investments also once again
included Bayer stock in the Storebrand
Principal Funds in 2005 with the rating Best
in Class Environmental and Social
Performance. In addition, our shares last
year were again listed in the French ASPI
Eurozone Index. British financial services
provider FTSE included Bayer stock in its
FTSE4Good series of indices, which contains
the shares of companies that are particularly
committed to environmental protection, human
rights and social standards.
Value-added
The Groups total operating performance
increased by 18.2 percent in 2005, to 28.8
billion. Value-added rose by 18.9 percent to
9.6 billion, primarily due to the gratifying
expansion of sales, which advanced by 17.6
percent year on year to 27.4 billion.
Stockholders received 0.7 billion, employees
5.9 billion, governments 0.9 billion and
lenders 0.9 billion. The remainder was
retained by the company. Value-added
indicates how the various stakeholders and
Bayer itself participate in the companys
commercial success.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Management Report 49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value-Added |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source |
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
million |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Net sales |
|
|
27,383 |
|
|
|
+ 17.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
1,390 |
|
|
|
+ 30.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating performance |
|
|
28,773 |
|
|
|
+ 18.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of materials |
|
|
9,726 |
|
|
|
+ 9.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
1,835 |
|
|
|
- 6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses |
|
|
7,609 |
|
|
|
+ 39.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value-added |
|
|
9,603 |
|
|
|
+ 18.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution |
|
2005 |
|
|
Share |
|
|
million |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Stockholders |
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
+ 7.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees |
|
|
5,912 |
|
|
|
+ 61.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Governments |
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
+ 9.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lenders |
|
|
913 |
|
|
|
+ 9.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings retention |
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
+ 12.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value-added |
|
|
9,603 |
|
|
|
+ 100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Social Responsibility
In the context of its corporate
social responsibility, the Bayer Group
continued developing existing programs,
established additional projects and took part
in important initiatives. As an official
sponsor of World Youth Day 2005 in Germany,
the company supported this event in various
ways. At the heart of these activities were
three major assemblies at the BayArena soccer
stadium in Leverkusen attended by tens of
thousands of helpers and pilgrims.
Young people play a special role in all
social initiatives sponsored by Bayer. In the
second year of its partnership with the
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP),
the company implemented and supported a dozen
environmental projects for young people
around the globe. With Bayers support, for
example, UNEP was able to set up regional
youth networks in Asia and organize the Tunza
International Youth Conference, the second
world youth environmental summit, from
October 12 to 18, 2005, in Bangalore, India. This
congress gave 150 youth representatives
of national environmental organizations
from 67 countries the opportunity not
just to further improve their
environmental knowledge and build
networks, but also to formulate
interests that young people around the
world associate with the topic of
environmental protection. These
interests are communicated to the
political decision-making bodies of
UNEP.
The two partners are now also jointly and
successfully implementing youth environmental
projects
originally established by Bayer. For
example, students of various disciplines from
nine countries in the Asia-Pacific region
took part in the Eco-Minds sustainability
forum in the Philippine capital of Manila in
order to jointly develop practical solutions
to environmental problems in that part of the
world. As a guest of honor on the opening day
of the event, Bayer Management Board member
Dr. Udo Oels welcomed Philippine President
Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, as well as more than
200 representatives of industry, politics,
academia and society. The visit by the Young
Environmental Envoys to Leverkusen in the
fall of 2005 rounded out the joint activities
of Bayer and UNEP. At Bayers invitation, 50
particularly dedicated young people from 14
countries in Asia, eastern Europe, Latin
America and for the first time Africa
traveled to Germany for one week in order to
learn first-hand about environmental
protection.
One of the many initiatives established
by Bayer to promote science literacy
celebrated the 10th anniversary of its
founding in 2005. Initially introduced in the
United States, the Making Science Make Sense
program has since been expanded to the United
Kingdom, Ireland and Japan. As part of this
program, more than 1,200 Bayer employees in
the United States alone volunteer their time
to visit elementary schools, where they make
science more attractive to the children
through exciting experiments designed to
explain everyday things. At the beginning of
2006, Bayer received
|
|
|
50 Management Report
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
the prestigious Ron Brown Award for
Corporate Leadership the only U.S.
presidential award to honor companies for
their activities in the social sector for
Making Science Make Sense. This was the
first time the award had been given to a
company with global headquarters outside the
U.S. and also to a chemical company.
In the area of social and health
advancement, Bayer has established several
new projects aimed at meeting the basic needs
of people in the newly industrializing
countries in particular. Together with the
Washington, D.C.-based National Geographic
Society, the worlds largest charitable
organization in the scientific field, Bayer
has set up the Global Exploration Fund in
order to promote innovative drinking water
and freshwater research. This makes Bayer the
first private-sector partner from outside
the United States to enter a long-term
collaboration with National Geographic.
In the fight against epidemic diseases,
Bayer has formed a partnership with the
U.S.-based non-profit organization Global
Alliance for Tuberculosis Drug Development
(TB Alliance). The goal of this partnership
is to develop a tuberculosis application for
the existing antibiotic moxifloxacin in
order to shorten the duration of treating the
disease, which currently lasts six months.
Should studies prove successful, the new
product will be provided to patients in
developing countries at affordable prices.
Bayer quickly aided victims of the
recent natural disasters through financial,
medical and material donations. In addition,
numerous Bayer employees participated with
tremendous personal dedication in relief
efforts mounted in the areas hit by flooding
in the United States, as well as in those
regions struck by earthquakes and in the
Asian countries devastated by the tsunami in
late 2004. The company made relief shipments
worth 13 million to assist victims of the
tsunami alone and has since supported various reconstruction
projects in the region.
Risk Management
Risk management is an integral part
of all decisions and business processes in
the Bayer Group. The management structure,
the planning system, and the detailed
reporting and information systems, in
particular, form the basis for the
organizational integration of risk management
into business processes.
As a global company, Bayer is exposed to a
wide variety of risks in the course of its
worldwide activities. Even before Germanys
Law on Corporate Supervision and
Transparency came into force on May 1, 1998,
Bayer AG operated an effective system for
identifying, communicating and dealing with
risks at an early stage. The principles
behind that system are spelled out in the
Risk Management Guidelines valid throughout
the Bayer Group. The goal is to identify the
potential risks associated with our
activities as early as possible by recording
them in a central database, evaluate them
according to set criteria, assess the
possible quantitative and qualitative
consequences of their occurrence, and take
suitable measures to mitigate them. The
various processes and instruments used
depending on the respective risk profile are
constantly being improved, supplemented and
optimized in line with statutory
requirements.
Reporting plays a key role in monitoring
the economic risks of our everyday business.
It must ensure that the business performance
of individual Group companies is described
and explained according to uniform
guidelines. In addition to the data on which
external reports are based, internal reports
are produced each month to ensure that the
Group Management Board and the various
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Management Report 51 |
management levels are fully alerted to
possible risks in a timely fashion. Group
accounting and controlling functions support
these activities and work to increase the
responsiveness and efficiency of the
reporting system. Our risk management system
is supported by monitoring and control
mechanisms based on established standard
software. These mechanisms are the subject of
continuous improvement and are adjusted to
changes in circumstances.
The internal audit department examines at
regular intervals the risk management
systems efficiency and functionality.
Additionally, our external auditors regularly
evaluate the systems functionality and brief
the Group Management Board and the
Supervisory Board on the results of these evaluations.
The Audit Committee of the Supervisory Board
consults regularly on risk management.
To counter risks that could arise from the
numerous tax, competition, patent, antitrust,
capital market and environmental regulations
and laws, we make our decisions and engineer
our business processes on the basis of
comprehensive legal advice provided both by
our own experts and by acknowledged external
specialists. We establish provisions in the
balance sheet, and regularly evaluate the
adequacy thereof, for legal risks relating to
past events.
Overall business risk
The development of our business and the
related fiscal objectives depends in part on
the performance of the economy in those
countries and regions which are relevant to
our operations. The early identification of
economic trends is a particularly important
element in the management of our business.
Continuous observation of the economic
situation in the most important countries and
regions is essential in this context. Our
analyses of the global economy and forecasts
of medium-term economic development are documented in detail on a quarterly basis
and used to support operative business
planning. For a summary forecast, see Future
Perspectives Economic Outlook on page 59.
Industry risk
The sales and earnings of the Bayer Groups
industrial businesses, and particularly the
Materials and Systems reporting segments, are
impacted by the business cycles of their
customer industries. These include in
particular the plastics processing,
automotive supply, construction, electronics
and electrical industries. In times of rapid
economic growth in the respective downstream
industries, chemical companies generally
expand capacities in order to maximize
revenues. In the past, capacity expansions in
some areas have exceeded market growth, which
has resulted in surplus capacities worldwide.
During an extended phase of economic
weakness, excess capacities can lead to a
decline in prices. These factors can result
in volatile margins and perhaps also
operating losses for the Bayer Group.
In the agrochemicals business, Bayer
Group sales are subject mainly to seasonal
and weather-related effects as well as to fluctuations in selling prices for agricultural
products. New agrochemical substances can
increase competitive pressure and reduce
sales of our products. In addition, the
increasing importance of biotechnology in the
crop science industry could lead to lower
demand for some of our agrochemical products
and, if there are other suppliers in the
market, to declining sales.
|
|
|
52 Management Report
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
In the agrochemical and pharmaceutical
industries, patent-protected products compete
only with alternative products or
applications. Following the expiration of
patent protection, a previously protected
product is generally subjected to intensified competition due to the market entrance of
generic suppliers. This can cause a loss of
market share and declining sales for the
Bayer Group.
Procurement market risk
As a manufacturing company active in numerous
areas of the health care and chemicals
industry, we procure significant quantities
of aromatics (benzene, toluene), propylene,
gas, coal and electrical energy for the
manufacture of our products. In this context,
we are subject to the risk that the raw
materials and utilities we need may not be
available, or that the quality or quantity
may not satisfy our requirements. Moreover,
market prices may fluctuate considerably
depending on the supply of and demand for
these raw materials.
The ongoing development of the procurement
system into a flexible network structure
allows Bayer to more easily identify risks on
the procurement markets at an early stage,
respond to changes and ensure a constant
supply of raw materials. The holding company
also ensures that Bayer can leverage its
position as a single enterprise to achieve
more favorable prices and supply terms for
the Group as a whole.
Exchange and interest rate risks
We guard against exchange and interest rate
risks by financing our business in local
currencies or by hedging currency and
interest positions using derivative financial instruments that serve no other
purpose. Such instruments are employed
according to the respective risk assessments
and on the basis of detailed guidelines. See
page 173 ff. for a detailed explanation of
the use of derivative financial instruments.
Risk to pension obligations through capital market developments
Changes and developments on the stock,
pension, real estate and other markets could
lead to considerable changes in the value of
plan assets. In addition, changes in earnings
expectations would affect the cash value of
our pension obligations. Furthermore, changes
in expectations as regards our pension
systems, for example with respect to wage and
remuneration increases, the ratio of
contributors to recipients,
mortality, the development of health care
costs and other factors, can lead to a
significant increase or decrease in
obligations for pensions or other
post-employment benefits. This in turn would
affect plan assets and could have a negative
impact on pension costs, future contributions
and stockholders equity. Please refer to
note [28] to the financial statements (page
145 ff.) for more information on the funding
of pensions and other post-employment benefits from pension systems.
We cannot rule out that charges or
contributions that may become necessary in
the future in connection with pensions and
other post-employment benefits could have a
significant negative effect on the Bayer
Groups liquidity and earnings performance.
Product and environmental risks
We address product and environmental risks by
way of suitable quality assurance measures.
These include certifying our operations to
international standards, continuously
upgrading our plants and processes, and
developing new and improved products. Strict
quality requirements are met by applying
uniform standards throughout the world. We
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Management Report 53 |
place great importance on the safety of
our products and their proper usage by
customers. We are committed to the
international Responsible Care initiative of
the chemical industry and to our own safety
and environmental management system, which we
report on at regular intervals. Specially
developed guidelines on product stewardship,
occupational safety and environmental
protection are designed to ensure that all of
our employees act competently and
responsibly.
To guard against possible liability risks and
compensation claims, we have concluded
insurance agreements to keep the potential
consequences within reasonable limits or
exclude them completely. The level of
insurance coverage is continuously
re-examined.
Legal risks
As a global company with a diverse business
portfolio, the Bayer Group is exposed to
numerous legal risks, particularly in the
areas of product liability, competition and
antitrust law, patent disputes, tax
assessments, and environmental matters. The
outcome of any current or future proceedings
cannot be predicted with certainty. It is
therefore possible that legal or regulatory
judgments could give rise to
expenses that are not covered, or not fully
covered, by insurers compensation payments
and could significantly affect our revenues
and earnings.
Legal proceedings currently considered to
involve material risks are outlined below.
The litigation referred to does not
necessarily represent an exhaustive list.
Lipobay/Baycol: As of January 13, 2006,
the number of Lipobay/Baycol cases pending
against Bayer worldwide was approximately
6,000 (approximately 5,900 of them in the
United States, including several class
actions). As of January 13, 2006, Bayer had
settled 3,082 Lipobay/Baycol cases worldwide without acknowledging any
liability and resulting in settlement
payments of approximately US$1,147 million.
Bayer will continue to offer fair
compensation to people who experienced
serious side effects while taking Lipobay/Baycol on a voluntary basis and without
concession of liability. In the United States
five cases have been tried to date all of
which were found in Bayers favor.
After more than four years of litigation we
are currently aware of fewer than 50 pending
cases in the United States that in our
opinion hold a potential for settlement,
although we cannot rule out the possibility
that additional cases involving serious side
effects from Lipobay/Baycol may come to our
attention. In addition, there could be
further settlements of cases outside of the
United States.
In the fiscal years 2003 and 2004,
Bayer recorded a total 347 million charge to
the operating result beyond the insurance
coverage. A further 43 million charge to the
operating result was recorded in 2005, in
respect of settlements already concluded or
expected to be concluded and anticipated
defense costs.
A group of stockholders has filed a
class-action lawsuit claiming damages against
Bayer AG and Bayer Corporation and two
current or former managers. The suit alleges
that Bayer violated U.S. securities laws by
making misleading statements, prior to the
withdrawal of Lipobay/Baycol from the market,
about the products commercial prospects and,
after its withdrawal, about the related
potential financial liability. In September
2005 the court dismissed with prejudice the
claims of non-U.S. purchasers of Bayer AG
stock on non-U.S. exchanges. Bayer believes
it has meritorious defenses and will defend
itself vigorously.
|
|
|
54 Management Report
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
PPA: Bayer is a defendant in numerous
product
liability lawsuits relating to
phenylpropanolamine (PPA), which was
previously contained in a cough/cold product
of the company supplied in
effervescent-tablet form. The first PPA
lawsuits were filed after the U.S. Food and
Drug Administration recommended in the fall
of 2000 that manufacturers voluntarily cease
marketing products containing this active
ingredient. Plaintiffs are alleging injuries
related to the claimed ingestion of PPA.
As of January 13, 2006, 286 lawsuits were
pending in U.S. federal and state courts
against Bayer, of which 136 name Bayer as the
only manufacturing defendant. An additional
295 cases are on appeal in federal court
after the plaintiffs claims had been
dismissed for failure to comply with
procedural requirements. No lawsuits have
been filed outside the United States.
Three state cases have proceeded to trial.
Two have resulted in defense verdicts for
Bayer. In one case, the plaintiff was awarded
damages of US$400,000. This case was settled
in July 2005 while on appeal.
As of January 13, 2006, Bayer had settled 247
cases resulting in payments of approximately
US$42 million, without acknowledging any
liability. In the fiscal year 2005, Bayer
recorded expenses in the amount of 62
million for settlements already concluded or
expected to be concluded and expected defense
costs.
Bayer will defend itself vigorously in
all Lipobay/Baycol and PPA cases in which in
our view no potential for settlement exists
or where an appropriate settlement cannot be
achieved. Due to the considerable uncertainty
associated with these proceedings, it is
currently not possible to further estimate
potential liability.
Since the existing insurance coverage is
exhausted (insurance coverage for PPA exists
for up to 5 percent of future costs), it is
possible depending on the future progress
of the litigation that Bayer could face
further payments that are not covered by the
accounting measures already taken. We will
regularly review the possibility of further
accounting measures depending on the progress
of the litigation.
Cipro®: 39 putative class
action lawsuits, one individual lawsuit and
one consumer protection group lawsuit (which
has been dismissed) against Bayer involving
the medication Cipro® have been filed since July 2000 in the United States. The
plaintiffs are suing Bayer and other
companies also named as defendants, alleging
that a settlement to end patent litigation
reached in 1997 between Bayer and Barr
Laboratories, Inc. violated antitrust
regulations. The plaintiffs claim the alleged
violation prevented the marketing of generic
ciprofloxacin as of 1997. In particular,
they are seeking triple damages under U.S.
law. After the settlement with Barr the
patent was the subject of a
successful re-examination by the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office and of
successful defenses in U.S. Federal Courts.
It has since expired.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Management Report 55 |
All the actions pending in federal court
were consolidated in federal district court
in New York in a multidistrict litigation
(MDL) proceeding. On March 31, 2005, the
court granted Bayers motion for summary
judgment and dismissed all of plaintiffs
claims in the MDL proceeding. The plaintiffs
are appealing this decision. Further cases
are pending before various state courts.
Bayer believes that it has meritorious
defenses and intends to defend these cases
vigorously.
Rubber, polyester polyols, urethane:
Proceedings involving the former rubber-related lines of business
Investigations by the E.U. Commission
and the U.S. and Canadian antitrust
authorities for alleged anticompetitive
conduct involving certain products in the
rubber field are pending. In two cases Bayer
AG has already reached agreements with the
U.S. Department of Justice to pay fines,
amounting to US$66 million for antitrust
violations relating to rubber chemicals and
US$4.7 million for those relating to
acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber (NBR). In
December 2005, the E.U. Commission imposed a
fine of 58.9 million for antitrust
violations in the area of rubber chemicals.
Further investigations by the named
authorities are ongoing.
Numerous civil claims for damages
including class actions are pending in the
United States and Canada against Bayer AG
and certain of its subsidiaries as well as
other companies. The lawsuits involve rubber
chemicals, EPDM, NBR and polychloroprene
rubber (CR). Bayer has reached agreements or
agreements in principle to settle a number of
these court actions. Some of these agreements
or agreements in principle remain subject to
court approval. These settlements do not
resolve all of the pending civil litigation
with respect to the aforementioned products,
nor do they preclude the bringing of
additional claims.
Proceedings involving polyester polyols, urethanes and urethane chemicals
Bayer Corporation has reached agreement with
the U.S. Department of Justice to pay a fine
of US$33 million for antitrust violations in
the United States relating to adipic-based
polyester polyols. A similar investigation is
pending in Canada.
A number of civil claims for damages
including class actions have been filed in
the United States against Bayer involving
allegations of unlawful collusion on prices
for certain polyester polyols, urethanes and
urethane chemicals product lines. Similar
actions are pending in Canada with respect to
polyester polyols.
Proceedings involving polyether polyols
and other precursors for urethane end-use
products
Bayer has been named as a defendant in
multiple putative class action lawsuits
involving allegations of price fixing of,
inter alia, polyether polyols and certain
other precursors for urethane end-use
products. Bayer has reached an agreement in
principle, subject to court approval, to
settle all of the class action cases relating
to claims from direct purchasers of polyether
polyols, MDI or TDI (and related systems).
The foregoing settlements do not resolve all
of the pending civil litigation with respect
to the aforementioned products, nor do they
preclude the bringing of additional claims.
Bayer was served with a subpoena from the
U.S. Department of Justice seeking
information relating to the manufacture and
sale of these products.
|
|
|
56 Management Report
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Impact of antitrust proceedings on Bayer
In consideration of the portion
allocated to LANXESS, expenses in the amount
of 336 million were accrued in the course of
2005 which led to the establishment of a
provision for the previously described civil
proceedings in the amount of 285 million as
of December 31, 2005. Bayer created a
provision of 80 million as of December 31,
2005 in respect of the rubber-related E.U.
proceedings noted above, although a reliable
estimate cannot be made as to the actual
amount of any expected additional fines.
These provisions taken may not be
sufficient to cover the ultimate outcome of the
above-described matters. The amount of
provisions established in 2005 for civil
proceedings was based on the expected
payments under the settlement agreements
described above. In the case of proposed
settlements in civil matters which have been
asserted as class actions, members of the
putative classes have the right to opt out
of the class, meaning that they elect not to
participate in the settlement. Plaintiffs
that opt out are not bound by the terms of
the settlement and have the right to
independently bring individual actions in
their own names to recover damages they
allegedly suffered. We cannot predict the
size or impact of the opt-out groups on the
settlement agreements.
Bayer will continue to pursue settlements
that in its view are warranted. In cases
where settlement is not
achievable, Bayer will continue to defend
itself vigorously.
The financial risk associated with the
proceedings described above beyond the
amounts already paid and the financial
provisions already established is currently
not quantifiable due to the considerable
uncertainty associated with these
proceedings. Consequently, no provisions
other than those described above have been
established. The Company expects that, in the
course of the regulatory proceedings and
civil damages suits, additional charges will
become necessary.
Patent and contractual disputes:
Further risks arise from patent disputes
in the United States. Bayer is alleged to
have infringed third-party patents relating
to the blood coagulation factor
Kogenate®. In another dispute,
Bayer has filed suit against several
companies, alleging patent infringement in
connection with moxifloxacin. These
companies are defending the action, claiming,
among other things, that the patents are
invalid and not enforceable.
In August 2005, Abbott filed suit
against, among others, Bayer for alleged
patent infringement in connection with blood
glucose monitors. The Japanese manufacturer
of the product Ascensia®
Contour® system is contractually
obligated to indemnify Bayer against the
potential liability.
Risks also exist in connection with
court or out-of-court proceedings in which
Bayer is alleged to have violated contractual
or pre-contractual obligations. For example,
Aventis Behring LLC alleges that Bayer
violated contractual obligations relating to
the supply of Helixate® and is
seeking damages.
Limagrain Genetics Corporation has filed
suit against Bayer as legal successor to
Rhône-Poulenc for indemnity against
liabilities to third parties arising from
breach of contract.
Bayer and Lyondell Group have asserted
claims against each other in a binding
arbitration proceeding arising from a joint
venture agreement in the manufacture of
propylene oxide generally relating to
differences in contractual interpretation.
Bayer believes it has meritorious defenses in
these patent and contractual disputes and
will defend itself vigorously.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Management Report 57 |
Product liability and other litigation:
Legal risks also arise from product
liability lawsuits other than those
concerning Lipobay/Baycol and PPA. Numerous
actions are pending against Bayer seeking
damages for plaintiffs resident outside of
the United States who claim to have been
become infected with HIV or HCV (hepatitis C
virus) through blood plasma products. Further
actions have been filed by U.S. residents
who claim to have become infected with HCV.
Bayer is also a defendant in cases in which
plaintiffs are asserting claims alleging
damage to health from the substance
thimoseral, used especially in immunoglobulin
therapies.
Bayer, together with other
manufacturers, wholesalers and users is a
defendant in the U.S. state of Alabama in
cases seeking damages, including one
nationwide putative class action, for
personal injuries alleging health damages
through exposure to diphenylmethane
diisocyanate (MDI) used in coal mines.
Bayer, like a number of other
pharmaceutical companies in the United
States, has several lawsuits pending against
it in which plaintiffs, including states, are
seeking damages, punitive damages and/or
disgorgement of profits, alleging
manipulation in the reporting of wholesale
prices and/or best prices.
A further risk may arise from asbestos
litigation in the United States. In the
majority of these cases, the plaintiffs
allege that Bayer and co-defendants employed
third parties on their sites in past decades
without providing them with sufficient
warnings or protection against the known
dangers of asbestos. One Bayer affiliate in
the United States is the legal successor to
companies that sold asbestos products until
1976. Should liability be established, Union
Carbide has to completely indemnify Bayer.
Bayer, among others, is named as a
defendant in a putative nationwide class
action pending in federal court in North
Carolina in the United States which alleges
violations of antitrust laws in the marketing
of the pest control product
Premise®.
Bayer believes it has meritorious
defenses in these product liability and other
proceedings and will defend itself
vigorously.
Liability considerations following the LANXESS spin-off
The liability situation following the
spin-off of the LANXESS subgroup is governed
by both statutory and contractual provisions.
Under the German Transformation Act, all
entities that are parties to a spin-off are
jointly and severally liable for obligations
of the transferor entity that are
established prior to the spin-off date.
Bayer AG and LANXESS AG are thus jointly and
severally liable for all obligations of Bayer
AG that existed on January 28, 2005. The
company to which the respective obligations
were not assigned under the Spin-Off and
Acquisition Agreement ceases to be liable for
such obligations after a five-year period.
Under the Master Agreement, Bayer AG and
LANXESS AG shall release the other party from
those liabilities each has assumed as
principal debtor according to the Spin-Off
Agreement and Acquisition Agreement.
The Master Agreement contains provisions for
the general apportionment of liability as
well as special provisions relating to the
apportionment of product liability and of
liability for environmental contamination and
antitrust violations between Bayer AG and
LANXESS. The Master Agreement applies to all
activities of Bayer and LANXESS units
throughout the world, subject to certain
conditions for the United States.
|
|
|
58 Management Report
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Subsequent events
With effect from January 1, 2006, the
Pharmaceuticals, Biological Products
reporting segment was renamed
Pharmaceuticals. The activities of the
Biological Products Division, which existed
until December 31, 2005, are now part of the
Pharmaceuticals Division.
On January 3, 2006, Bayer HealthCare
announced its acquisition from
GlaxoSmithKline of the European business for
the blood pressure treatment telmisartan,
which is marketed under the trade names
Pritor® and
PritorPlus®. The acquired business
achieved sales of approximately 65 million
in 2005. With this acquisition, we gained the
right to market the drug in Italy, Spain,
France, Greece, Portugal and additional
European markets. It was agreed not to
disclose the financial terms of the
transaction.
In addition, Bayer HealthCare and Nuvelo
Inc. announced on January 5, 2006 that they
had entered into a collaboration agreement
for the development and commercialization of
alfimeprase, a novel blood clot dissolver
which is currently in clinical phase III
development. Because of the late-stage
development status of alfimeprase, Nuvelo
received a US$50 million up-front cash
payment in January 2006. The company could
additionally receive up to US$335 million in
milestone payments. Bayer HealthCare will
bear 40 percent, and Nuvelo 60 percent, of
the global development costs. Nuvelo will
conduct the clinical development program.
On January 9, 2006, Bayer Innovation
GmbH acquired the biotech company Icon
Genetics AG, headquartered in Munich,
Germany. Icon Genetics discovers innovative
methods for the development and use of
engineered plants in the manufacture of
therapeutically active substances.
Two studies published in the medical
literature in January 2006 reported an
association of Trasylol®
(aprotinin) with an increased risk of serious
renal dysfunction and
cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events (heart
failure and stroke) in patients undergoing
open-heart surgery. Relevant regulatory
authorities are currently reviewing these
reports. Based upon the results of these
reviews, the authorities will determine what
actions may be warranted. Bayer believes that
Trasylol® is a safe and effective
treatment when used in accordance with the
product labeling.
Dr. Wolfgang Plischke was appointed to
the Board of Management of Bayer AG with
effect from March 1, 2006. Until that date he served as a
member of the Bayer HealthCare Executive
Committee and head of the
Pharmaceuticals Division. Dr. Plischke
will succeed Dr. Udo Oels, who ends his
active duty following the Annual
Stockholders Meeting on April 28, 2006.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Management Report 59 |
Despite the strong headwind resulting
from ongoing high raw material and energy
prices, we once again expect robust economic
growth worldwide for 2006, albeit with
declining momentum. Although the central
banks will continue to slowly and gradually
rein in their expansionary monetary policies,
the global economy will most likely still
benefit from low financing costs and
relatively good corporate earnings
performances. However, we are not
underestimating the risks that the economy
could face as a result of global trade
imbalances, a stronger increase in raw
material prices or a considerable slowdown in
the real estate market. In the short-term,
rising energy prices will most likely present
the biggest risk to growth.
We continue to rate the perspectives for
economic development in the United States as
positive. Economic growth will most likely
remain strong and support the global economy.
However, a further tightening of monetary
policy could gradually weaken
the pace of economic growth. The Federal
Reserve (FED) is expected to at first
continue its policy of moderate interest rate
hikes and thus further reduce the stimulating
effect of monetary policy. Private
consumption probably will not increase as
strongly as in 2005 due to the expected
cooling of the real estate market, but will
most likely remain robust as employment rates
continue to rise. We also expect that
investment activity will be spurred in part
by favorable corporate earnings performances
and increasing capacity bottlenecks in
various sectors.
The economic recovery that became apparent in
Europe in the final months of 2005 will
most likely strengthen in 2006. However, the
growth rate will likely be weaker than in
other regions. In the euro zone we anticipate
that the pace of expansion will accelerate
slightly, buoyed by growth in exports
and improved corporate competitiveness.
However, we do not yet see a turnaround
toward sustained stronger growth. We expect
that equipment investments will increase
significantly over the course of the year
due to continued low interest rates and
positive earnings forecasts. On the other
hand, the growth in private consumption will
most likely be restrained, although somewhat
stronger than in 2005. Despite the slightly
more positive overall trends, rising energy
prices and continuing weak consumer confidence could continue to dampen the economy.
We believe that the recovery of the Japanese
economy will continue, driven by the
favorable situation on the employment market
and by robust corporate investment activity.
Private consumption is expected to continue
to expand moderately, although the increase
in demand could slow down somewhat due to a
restrictive financial policy coupled with
high national debt. Exports will probably
rise sharply in the short term, but the pace
of growth could ease later on.
In the east Asian threshold countries,
the pace of economic growth will weaken
somewhat due to the slowdown in China. In our
estimation, however, the outlook remains
positive overall. Despite a reduction in the
pace of growth, the Chinese economy is likely
to continue to spur trade within the region.
This will enable most countries to remain on
a strong expansion course due to export
growth and higher domestic demand.
In our opinion, the Latin American
economy will most likely sustain robust
growth in view of continued strong exports,
persistently high raw material prices and the
strengthening of domestic demand. Growth is
expected to be slightly below that of the
past two years overall, however.
|
|
|
60 Management Report
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Business strategy
The Bayer Group is focusing on the
fast-growing, innovation-driven health care,
nutrition and high-tech materials businesses
in line with its mission statement: Bayer:
Science For A Better Life. By strategically
aligning ourselves to these attractive
markets and concentrating on our core
competencies, we aim to invest more
intensively in growth areas and innovative
technologies in order to achieve a leadership
role or expand our already strong market
positions. We will also press ahead with
cost-containment and efficiency-improvement
efforts in order to further increase the
companys value over the long term. For a
detailed description of our financial
strategy, please consult the Liquidity and
Capital Resources section on page 29 ff.
Bayer HealthCare
Bayer HealthCares goal is to match or exceed
market growth in all divisions.
Our biggest HealthCare division,
Pharmaceuticals, comprises both Specialty
Care and Primary Care activities. In addition
to products emerging from our own research
and development laboratories, our strategy
for strengthening our portfolio also includes
inlicensing and life cycle management. We
also regularly examine options for expanding
our business through collaborations or
acquisitions.
Our primary goal in Specialty Care,
which concentrates on the growth and
development indications oncology and
hematology/cardiology, is the global
expansion of our business. In this field,
which is characterized by a high demand for
innovation, Bayer offers a number of
successful products, such as
Kogenate® and
Trasylol®, and promising new
brands and development projects, such as
Nexavar® and the Factor Xa
inhibitor BAY 59-7939. The introduction of
Nexavar® in the United States at
the end of 2005 for the treatment of renal
cell carcinoma was an important step in
strengthening our pharmaceutical specialties
business.
Our Primary Care business offers
products for general practitioners, such as
our young Levitra® brand and more
established brands like Adalat®,
Avelox®, Cipro® and
Glucobay®. While we have formed a
marketing alliance with Schering-Plough in
the United States, we handle business in the
other regions ourselves. Here we aim to
further strengthen our activities through
targeted inlicensing.
The goal of our Consumer Care Division is to
expand our leading position in the OTC market. Following the successful integration
of Roche Consumer Health, we
aim to fully exhaust the growth potential of
our well-known brands such as
Alka-Seltzer®,
Aspirin®, Bepanthen®,
One-A-Day® and Rennie®
through intensive marketing and product
management. We also plan to further expand
our position through external growth.
Our Diagnostics Division is working
toward taking a place among the worlds
leading suppliers. Here we are focusing on
the immunoassay, clinical chemistry and
molecular testing market segments. Our
strategy is focused on achieving growth by
reaching new customer groups and offering
cost-effective system solutions and services.
We are also investing in the expansion of our
position in growing markets such as Asia.
Our Diabetes Care Division aims to
expand its competitive position in the area
of blood glucose measurement. To this end, we
are expanding our product range by developing
new measurement systems and test strips to
enable even more user-friendly blood sugar
monitoring for diabetics. We intend to
enhance our competitiveness through
cost-containment measures and the more efficient use of our resources. Our strategy also
includes increasing our expertise through
strategic partnerships.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Management Report 61 |
In the Animal Health Division we aim to
become a preferred partner and solutions
provider. Our strategy is directed primarily
at strengthening the division through organic
growth and the focus on attractive markets.
In order to supplement our product range,
Animal Health regularly evaluates options for
acquisitions or strategic alliances.
Bayer CropScience
The Bayer CropScience subgroup, which is
comprised of the Crop Protection and
Environmental Science, BioScience segments,
aims to strengthen its leading market
position. Here we plan to further develop our
existing portfolio in order to achieve
sustained profitable growth. We will
evaluate external growth options particularly
in the Environmental Science, BioScience
segment. Bayer CropScience intends to achieve
its earnings targets primarily by introducing
new products, keeping tight control on costs
and consolidating its portfolio. We aim to
further increase efficiency in all areas of
Bayer CropScience through cost-containment
and the improvement of internal business
processes.
Our Crop Protection segment is committed
to defending its leading market position.
Here we are relying in particular on our
strong global presence and on our innovative
portfolio of high-performance
insecticides, fungicides, herbicides and
seed treatment products. We are also focusing
on the continuous introduction of new
products from our research and development
pipeline and on consistent life cycle
management.
Environmental Science is one of the
worlds leading suppliers of non-agricultural
pest control products. Our goal is to further
expand this market position by developing and
marketing high-quality products. We also aim to build strong
partnerships with our customers and offer
made-to-measure, customer-oriented
innovations that generate strong brand
loyalty.
BioScience is internationally active in
seed research, development and marketing. The
business unit offers solutions based on plant
biotechnology and breeding, concentrating on
canola, cotton, rice and vegetables. We also
develop innovative, plant-based materials for
applications in health care, biomaterials and
nutrition.
Bayer MaterialScience
The Bayer MaterialScience subgroup aims to
further expand its global market position.
Here we are relying in particular on our
technological know-how, new applications for
our products and the targeted expansion of
our presence in the growth markets of Asia.
Our portfolio is focused mainly on
polycarbonates and polyurethanes. Here we
concentrate on world-scale facilities
featuring state-of-the-art technology, and
pursue an organic growth strategy. In
addition to our activities in the growth
market of China, we constantly evaluate
business options in other regions in order to
expand our market coverage.
We rely on products and applications emerging
from our R&D laboratories for the further
development of our businesses. To access
innovative markets, Bayer MaterialScience
identifies new technology and market trends,
evaluates them and transfers the most
promising ideas to research and development
projects. We also support our growth strategy
by examining strategic partnerships and
opportunities for forward integration.
|
|
|
62 Management Report
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Objectives for 2006
Planning assumptions
We continue to predict a supportive business
environment. Our planning for the next two
years is based on the assumption that the
world economy will grow at an annual rate of
about 3 percent and that our most important
customer industries and markets will develop
favorably. We have budgeted for an exchange
rate of US$1.30 to the euro.
Risks to this forecast stem mainly from the
potentially adverse economic effects of
trends in raw material and energy prices.
Group sales and earnings forecast
Fiscal 2005 was among the most
successful years in Bayers history, with
EBIT at a record high. Our underlying EBITDA
margin of 18.6 percent already put us very
close to our 2006 target a year ahead of
schedule. We intend to build on this positive
development.
In 2006 we aim to grow at least with the
market in all areas and again improve our
overall operating performance. We expect
Group sales in 2006 to exceed 28 billion,
which would mean an increase of about 5
percent on a currency- and portfolio-adjusted
basis. The high earnings level of 2005 will
be the yardstick for our performance in 2006.
We plan to achieve a slight further
improvement in EBIT before special items and
in underlying EBITDA. Earnings growth is
likely to come mainly from the HealthCare and
CropScience subgroups, while profitability
in MaterialScience could fall short of the
excellent 2005 level.
In 2006 we are targeting an underlying EBITDA
margin of approximately 19 percent, to
continue the upward trend of recent years.
We are budgeting for special charges of less than
100 million. This amount does not include
potential litigation-related expenses or
charges for possible further
restructuring in the CropScience
subgroup.
To safeguard growth, we are planning capital
expenditures of 1.7 billion, including 1.5
billion for property, plant and equipment. We
anticipate that depreciation and amortization
will total roughly 1.7 billion, with property, plant and
equipment accounting for 1.1 billion of
this amount. We plan to spend 1.9
billion on research and development.
In 2007
based on currently available
information and the aforementioned planning
assumptions we expect to record a positive
business performance and a further increase
in earning power.
Subgroups sales and earnings forecasts
Bayer HealthCare
We expect the market environment for our
Healthcare activities to remain favorable.
All divisions should be able to expand at
least with the market, given the high growth
potential of our portfolio and the new
products it includes. We believe this
subgroup can improve EBIT before special
items by more than 10 percent. Crucial to
this significant planned increase will be
higher product sales combined with enhanced
efficiencies in Consumer Care and
Pharmaceuticals. Overall we aim to further
improve on the current underlying EBITDA
margin of 19 percent.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Management Report 63 |
Bayer CropScience
Following the decline in the crop protection
market in 2005, we predict a modest overall
increase in 2006. Drawing on our portfolio of
new active ingredients, we plan to grow above
market and increase EBIT before special
items. The underlying EBITDA margin should
continue to improve.
Against a background of adverse market
developments, particularly in Brazil, we will
not yet meet our original target of a 25
percent EBITDA margin in 2006. Further
restructuring will be carried out to enhance
profitability.
Bayer MaterialScience
Following a very successful 2005, we
believe the general market environment for
the MaterialScience business will remain
positive and that we can continue to grow in
2006. Our planning assumes an increase in
global production capacities and higher
energy costs, with raw material costs
remaining steady at a high level. In view of
these conditions, we again expect to post
excellent EBIT before special items, though
possibly below the 2005 level. In 2005 we
already achieved the EBITDA margin of 18
percent targeted for 2006. This figure is
now likely to decline slightly in 2006.
|
|
|
64 Bayer CropScience
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Bayer: Science For A Better Life 65 |
|
|
|
66 Bayer CropScience
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Jerry Mimms is among the many cotton
farmers in the United States who have come to
rely on FiberMax® seed, which has
been very successful in the U.S. and several
other countries. And with good reason: this
seed yields top-quality fibers.
Each year roughly 23 million tons of
cotton fiber worth more than
20 billion is produced globally. Yet only ten
percent of this yield is of peak quality,
with extremely fine, long and strong fibers. Before FiberMax® came on the
scene, cotton of this quality could be grown
only in areas such as Egypt, California and
Australia.
The development of high-quality seed such as
FiberMax® is at the focus of the
companys biotech research. Bayer CropScience
hopes to offer cotton seed that yields not
only longer fibers but also other useful
properties such as fire retardancy,
wrinkle-free characteristics and better dye
fastness.
For Bayer, plant biotechnology is among
the most important technologies of the
twenty-first century. Apart from developing
seed products, Bayer is also planning to
manufacture products and active ingredients
for the health care and nutrition fields,
as well as for industrial applications that
have a key role to play in the development of
renewable resources.
Today, Bayer CropScience not only
develops leading quality seed products, it is
the world leader in crop protection and has
innovative active ingredients under
development that should ensure that the
company maintains this position. Since 2000,
a total of 16 new active ingredients have
been introduced to the market, with ten more
substances due to be added to the BCS
portfolio by 2011.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Bayer: Science For A Better Life 67 |
|
|
|
68 Investor Information
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Bayer stock posts record performance of 54 percent
Bayer ranked among the best equities in the DAX index in 2005, with a performance*
of 54 percent on the year. The stock closed the year at 35.29, its highest year-end price
since 2000. The dividend of 0.95 per share for 2005 to be proposed to the Annual
Stockholders Meeting represents a 73 percent increase from the previous year.
A very good year on the stock market
2005 was a very good year for equity
investors. On December 30, 2005, the German
stock index DAX closed up 27.1 percent at
5,408 points. Until May, the DAX moved mainly
sideways against a background of uncertainty
caused by rising oil prices and other
factors. The turning point came in May when
the German government announced an early
parliamentary election. In the weeks that
followed, the DAX showed a marked upward
trend, temporarily dampened by the terrorist
attacks in London in July. On September 7 the
DAX reached 5,000 points for the first time
since May 2002. The EURO STOXX 50, which
contains the 50 leading blue chips in the
euro zone, including Bayer, ended the year up
24.3 percent.
Bayer stock clearly outperformed
the DAX in 2005
Bayer stock significantly outperformed
the DAX index in 2005, ending the year up 50.5 percent
at 35.29, the highest year-end price since
2000. Including the 2004 dividend of 0.55
per share paid in 2005, our stock achieved a
performance of 53.7 percent. Market
capitalization (the number of shares
multiplied by the year-end price) was 25.8
billion, 8.7 billion higher than the year before.
Having hit its low for the year in
January (closing price on January 12, 2005:
22.11), the price of Bayer stock advanced
more or less steadily throughout 2005. In the
early part of the year the improvement was
mainly driven by the spin-off of LANXESS. The
first quarters results were very well
received by the capital market, bolstering
the upward trend, with further support coming
from the release of positive data on the
clinical trials for our cancer drug
Nexavar®. The alliance with
Johnson & Johnson for our Factor Xa
inhibitor, along with very strong
third-quarter figures, provided a further
sharp boost to the share price toward the end
of the year.
High demand for innovative hybrid bond
To finance its activities, Bayer issues bonds
under rule 144a in the U.S. and under a
European Medium Term Notes (EMTN) program.
The larger bond issues of Bayer AG under the
EMTN program are listed in major bond indices
in light of their high issuance volume and
liquidity.
Last year the Bayer Group once again offered
bond investors attractive investment
opportunities, including an innovative hybrid
bond. This
|
|
* |
growth in share price plus reinvested dividend |
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Investor Information 69 |
subordinated bond has a 100-year
term, and Bayer has a quarterly call option
at par after ten years. In addition the bond
contains certain coupon deferral mechanisms.
In return, investors were offered a high
nominal interest rate of 5 percent p.a. This
hybrid bond is treated as debt for accounting purposes but is regarded mainly as
equity by the rating agencies and thus
improves the Groups debt coverage ratios.
Demand for the bond was so high that an
issuance volume of 1.3 billion was placed at
the lowest new issue spread achieved to date
for any corporate hybrid bond.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Stock Data |
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Dividend |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
Earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.94 |
|
|
|
2.19 |
|
|
Gross cash flow per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.95 |
|
|
|
4.76 |
|
|
Equity per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.98 |
|
|
|
15.28 |
|
|
|
|
Year-end price* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.45 |
** |
|
|
35.29 |
|
|
High for the year* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.92 |
** |
|
|
35.92 |
|
|
Low for the year* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.33 |
** |
|
|
22.11 |
|
|
|
|
Shares issued as of year end |
|
million |
|
|
730.34 |
|
|
|
730.34 |
|
|
Average daily share turnover on German stock exchanges |
|
million |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
Market capitalization at year end |
|
billion |
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
|
|
|
|
Total dividend payment |
|
million |
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
694 |
|
|
Price/earnings ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
Price/cash flow ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
* |
XETRA closing prices; Source: Bloomberg |
|
** |
2004 prices adjusted for the spin-off of LANXESS |
|
|
|
70 Investor Information
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
For the successful structuring and
placement of this hybrid bond, Bayer received
awards for the best corporate bond issue of
2005 from both the International Financing
Review (ifr) and the financial journal
EuroWeek.
Bayers high credit standing maintained
Both Standard & Poors and Moodys confirmed the companys high creditworthiness on
several occasions last year, upholding their
previous ratings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term |
|
|
Short-term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rating |
|
|
rating |
|
|
Outlook |
|
|
Since |
|
Moodys |
|
|
A3 |
|
|
|
P-2 |
|
|
stable |
|
|
June 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S&P |
|
|
A |
|
|
|
A-1 |
|
|
stable |
|
|
July 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend raised to 0.95
The Board of Management and the Supervisory
Board will propose to the Annual
Stockholders Meeting that a dividend of
0.95 per
share be paid for fiscal 2005
up 0.40, or 73 percent, from the previous
year. The dividend yield calculated on the
year-end price of the stock is 2.7 percent.
This substantial increase in the dividend is
intended to ensure that our stockholders benefit
appropriately from our very pleasing results
for 2005 and expresses our confidence in
the future development of the enterprise.
Dialogue with the capital market stepped up further
In 2005 our investor relations
activities continued to focus on providing
timely and reliable information to financial
analysts, institutional investors, rating
agencies and private investors.
We addressed analysts and institutional
investors and responded to their questions at
more than 40 roadshows and investor
conferences in the financial centers of
Europe, North America and Asia. Principal
topics included the status of the development
candidates in our pharmaceutical pipeline,
Bayers role in the bidding for the Boots OTC
business, our assessment of the chemicals
cycle and trends on the global agrochemicals
market.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Investor Information 71 |
We also organized two special conferences in
2005 to give analysts and investors even
deeper insight into the Bayer Groups
business activities.
The first of these was held at the
European headquarters of Bayer CropScience in
Lyon, France, in September, and provided
detailed information on all aspects of that
subgroups business. Then in December, we
invited investors to a research and
development conference in London to explain
the entire spectrum of research taking place
in the Bayer Group. Both events were
broadcast live on the Internet, and on-demand
versions remain available on our website.
Moreover, we held a total of seven
telephone conference calls, which were also
streamed live over the Internet, to provide
additional background to our quarterly
results and key events at Bayer.
Buoyant demand for Bayer stock
Bayer shares are listed on all stock
exchanges in Germany, on the New York Stock
Exchange, and also in Spain, Japan, the U.K.
and Switzerland. In the United States, Bayer
stock is traded in the form of American
Depositary Receipts (ADRs).
In early 2006 we delisted our stock in
Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Belgium
and France, largely because of low trading
volumes in these markets.
The average daily trading volume in
Bayer stock on the German stock exchanges was
about 4.1 million shares (2004: 3.9 million).
There were some 37.3 million ADRs outstanding at the end of December 2005, with
each ADR representing one share.
WWW.INVESTOR.BAYER.COM
|
|
|
72 Corporate Governance*
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Bayer complies with the German Corporate Governance Code
Bayer has always placed great importance on responsible corporate governance and will
continue to do so. Last year the company issued a declaration that it is in full compliance
with the recommendations of the German Corporate Governance Code.
In 2005 the Board of Management and
Supervisory Board again addressed the issue
of code compliance, particularly in light of
the new recommendations issued on June 2. The
resulting Declaration of Conformity (see page
74) was published in December 2005 and posted
on Bayers website along with previous
declarations.
Compliance with the recommendations means,
for example, that it will not be the rule for
the former Chairman or other member of the
Board of Management to become a member of the
Supervisory Board (Article 5.4.4). Similarly,
when elections to the Supervisory Board were
held in April 2005, Bayer already complied
with the recommendation that members be
elected individually (Article 5.4.3.).
Supervisory Board: oversight and control functions
The role of the 20-member Supervisory Board
is to oversee and advise the Board of
Management. Under the German Codetermination
Act, half the members of the Supervisory
Board are elected by the stockholders, and
half by the employees. The Supervisory Board
is directly involved in decisions on matters
of fundamental importance to the company and
confers with the Board of Management on the
companys strategic alignment. It also holds
regular discussions with the Board of
Management on the companys business strategy
and status of its implementation.
The Chairman of the Supervisory Board
coordinates its work and presides over the
meetings. Through regular discussions with the Board of Management, the
Supervisory Board is kept constantly informed
of business policy, corporate planning and
strategy. The annual budget and the
consolidated financial statements of Bayer
AG and the Bayer Group are submitted to the
Supervisory Board to obtain its approval,
which must also take the auditors report
into account. Details are provided in the
Report of the Supervisory Board on page 189 ff. of
this Annual Report. The committees set up by
the Supervisory Board operate in compliance
with the German Stock Corporation Act, the
German Corporate Governance Code, the U.S.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the rules of the New
York Stock Exchange. The committees of the
Supervisory Board are as follows:
Presidial Committee: This comprises two
stockholder representatives and two employee
representatives. Its main task is to serve as
the mediation committee pursuant to the
German Codetermination Act. It submits
proposals to the Supervisory Board on the
appointment of members of the Board of
Management if the necessary two-thirds
majority is not achieved in the first vote
at a plenary meeting.
Audit Committee: The Audit Committee,
comprising three stockholder representatives
and three employee representatives, meets
four times a year. Its tasks include
examining the companys internal and external
accounting and the quarterly and annual financial statements prepared by the Board of
Management. On the basis of the auditors
report on the annual financial statements,
the Audit Committee submits proposals
concerning their approval by the full
Supervisory Board.
The Audit Committee also oversees the
companys internal control system along with
the procedures used to identify, track and
manage risks, and monitors compliance with
laws and statutory regulations.
The companys Corporate Auditing department
reports regularly to the Audit Committee,
which also is responsible for the companys
relationship with the external auditor. The
Audit Committee prepares the awarding of the
audit contract to the audit firm appointed
by the Annual Stockholders Meeting, suggests
areas of focus for the audit and determines
the auditors remuneration. It also
|
|
|
* |
|
report pursuant to Section 3.10 of the German
Corporate Governance Code see note [29.1] to the financial statements on page 161 for information on
Section 7.1.3 of the Code (stock option programs) |
WWW.BAYER.COM > ABOUT BAYER > CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Corporate Governance 73 |
monitors the independence, qualifications, rotation and efficiency of the
auditor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Variable |
|
|
|
|
Remuneration of the Members of the Supervisory Board |
|
Remuneration |
|
|
Remuneration |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Paul Achleitner |
|
|
70,041.67 |
|
|
|
21,012.50 |
|
|
|
91,054.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Josef Ackermann |
|
|
60,000.00 |
|
|
|
18,000.00 |
|
|
|
78,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andreas Becker |
|
|
40,167.00 |
|
|
|
12,050.00 |
|
|
|
52,217.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Karl-Josef Ellrich |
|
|
75,000.00 |
|
|
|
22,500.00 |
|
|
|
97,500.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Thomas Fischer |
|
|
18,750.00 |
|
|
|
5,625.00 |
|
|
|
24,375.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erhard Gipperich |
|
|
105,000.00 |
|
|
|
31,500.00 |
|
|
|
136,500.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Hellmuth |
|
|
60,000.00 |
|
|
|
18,000.00 |
|
|
|
78,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Dr.-Ing. e. h. Hans-Olaf Henkel |
|
|
75,000.00 |
|
|
|
22,500.00 |
|
|
|
97,500.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. rer. pol. Dipl.-Kfm. Klaus Kleinfeld |
|
|
40,167.00 |
|
|
|
12,050.00 |
|
|
|
52,217.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. h. c. Martin Kohlhaussen |
|
|
105,000.00 |
|
|
|
31,500.00 |
|
|
|
136,500.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Christian Kornblum |
|
|
60,000.00 |
|
|
|
18,000.00 |
|
|
|
78,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petra Kronen |
|
|
75,000.00 |
|
|
|
22,500.00 |
|
|
|
97,500.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Heinrich von Pierer |
|
|
24,791.33 |
|
|
|
7,437.50 |
|
|
|
32,228.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wolfgang Schenk |
|
|
56,250.00 |
|
|
|
16,875.00 |
|
|
|
73,125.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hubertus Schmoldt |
|
|
75,000.00 |
|
|
|
22,500.00 |
|
|
|
97,500.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Manfred Schneider |
|
|
180,000.00 |
|
|
|
54,000.00 |
|
|
|
234,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dieter Schulte |
|
|
60,000.00 |
|
|
|
18,000.00 |
|
|
|
78,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr.-Ing. Ekkehard D. Schulz |
|
|
40,167.00 |
|
|
|
12,050.00 |
|
|
|
52,217.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Ing. e. h. Jürgen Weber |
|
|
60,000.00 |
|
|
|
18,000.00 |
|
|
|
78,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siegfried Wendlandt |
|
|
75,000.00 |
|
|
|
22,500.00 |
|
|
|
97,500.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinhard Wendt |
|
|
19,833.00 |
|
|
|
5,950.00 |
|
|
|
25,783.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas de Win |
|
|
75,000.00 |
|
|
|
22,500.00 |
|
|
|
97,500.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Dr. h. c. Ernst-Ludwig Winnacker |
|
|
60,000.00 |
|
|
|
18,000.00 |
|
|
|
78,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Hermann Wunderlich |
|
|
19,833.00 |
|
|
|
5,950.00 |
|
|
|
25,783.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Supervisory Board of Bayer AG has
designated Dr. Manfred Schneider as an Audit
Committee Financial Expert pursuant to the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Human Resources Committee: On this
committee, too, there is parity of
representation between stockholders and
employees. It consists of the Chairman of the
Supervisory Board, one other stockholder
representative and two employee
representatives. The Human Resources
Committee prepares the personnel decisions to
be made by the Supervisory Board. In
particular, it concludes service contracts
with the members of the Board of Management
on behalf of the Supervisory Board. It also
provides advice on long-term succession
planning for the Board of Management.
Personal liability in place of a deductible
With regard to the recommendation in the
German Corporate Governance Code that a
deductible be agreed for any D&O (directors
and officers liability) insurance, the
companys D&O insurance does not cover
intentional breach of duty and thus there is
no deductible.
Instead, personal declarations have been
given by the members of the Board of
Management and Supervisory Board that, should
they cause damage to the company or third
parties through gross negligence (by German
standards) in the performance of their
duties, they undertake to pay for such damage
up to the equivalent of half their total
annual compensation for the year in which
such damage occurs. The members of the
Supervisory Board undertake to pay for such
damage, if caused by them, up to the
equivalent of the variable portion of their
respective annual compensation as Supervisory
Board members for the relevant year.
|
|
|
74 Corporate Governance
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Disclosure of securities transactions by
members of the Supervisory Board and Board of
Management
To comply with Section 15 a of the German
Securities Trading Act, members of the Board
of Management and Supervisory Board and their
close relatives are required to disclose all
transactions involving the purchase or sale
of Bayer stock where such transactions total
5,000 or more in a calendar year. Bayer
publishes details of such transactions
immediately on its website and also notifies
the German Financial Supervisory Authority
accordingly. No reportable securities
transactions were made in fiscal 2005.
According to information filed with the
company by members of the Board of Management
and Supervisory Board, their total holdings
of Bayer stock and related financial
instruments amounted to less than 1 percent of the issued
stock on the closing date for the financial
statements.
Systematic monitoring
of all business
activities
Bayer has an internal control system in
place to ensure early identification of any
business or financial risks and enable it to
manage such risks so as to minimize any
impact on the achievement of its commercial
objectives. The control system is designed to
ensure timely and accurate accounting for all
business processes and the constant
availability of reliable data on the
companys financial position.
Where acquisitions are made during a fiscal year, we aim to bring the acquired
units internal control systems into line
with those of the Bayer Group as quickly as
possible.
Declaration by the Board of Management and the Supervisory Board of Bayer AG
concerning the German Corporate Governance Code (June 2, 2005 version) pursuant to
Article 161 of the German Stock Corporation Act*
Under article 161 of the German Stock Corporation Act, the Board of Management and the
Supervisory Board of Bayer AG are required to issue an annual declaration that the company has
been, and is, in compliance with the recommendations of the Government Commission on the
German Corporate Governance Code as published by the Federal Ministry of Justice in the
official section of the electronic Federal Gazette (Bundesanzeiger), or to advise of any
recommendations that have not been, or are not being, applied. The declaration pursuant to
article 161 of the Stock Corporation Act shall be available to shareholders at all times.
With respect to the past, the following declaration refers to the May 21, 2003 version of the
Code. With respect to present and future corporate governance practices at Bayer AG, the
following declaration refers to the recommendations in the June 2, 2005 version of the Code.
The Board of Management and the Supervisory Board of Bayer AG hereby declare that the company
is in compliance with the recommendations of the Government Commission on the German
Corporate Governance Code as published by the Federal Ministry of Justice in the official
section of the electronic Federal Gazette and has been in compliance since issuance of the
last declaration of conformity in December 2004.
Leverkusen, December 2005
|
|
|
|
|
For the Board of Management:
|
|
|
|
For the Supervisory Board: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wenning |
|
Kühn |
|
Dr. Schneider |
|
|
|
* |
|
This is an English translation of a German document. The German
document is the official and controlling version, and this
English translation in no event modifies, interprets or limits
the official German version. |
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Corporate Governance 75 |
However, the control and risk management
system cannot protect the company from all
business risks. In particular, it cannot
provide absolute protection against losses or
fraudulent actions.
Corporate Compliance Program
Our corporate activity is governed by
national and local laws and statutes that
place a range of obligations on the Bayer
Group and its employees throughout the world.
Bayer manages it business responsibly in
compliance with the statutory and regulatory
requirements of the countries in which it
operates.
The Board of Management has also issued
guidelines to support legal compliance. These
are summarized in the Program for Legal
Compliance and Corporate Responsibility at
Bayer (Corporate Compliance Program), which
contains binding rules on complying with
international trade law, adhering to the
principle of fair competition and concluding
contracts with business partners on fair
terms.
To avoid conflicts of interest, every
employee is required to separate corporate
and private interests. The program also lays
down clear rules for employee integrity
toward the company and the responsible
handling of insider information.
Compliance Committees have been established
at Bayer AG and each of its subgroups and
service companies: Bayer HealthCare, Bayer
CropScience, Bayer MaterialScience, Bayer
Business Services, Bayer Technology Services
and Bayer Industry Services. Each Compliance
Committee includes at least one legal
counsel.
The role of these committees is to initiate
and monitor systematic, business-specific
training and other measures necessary to
ensure implementation of the Corporate
Compliance Program. They are also responsible
for investigating any suspected violations of
the Corporate Compliance Program and, if
necessary, taking steps to rectify them. All
Compliance Committees report at least once a
year to a coordination committee chaired by
the Chief Financial Officer on any violations
notified to them, the investigations carried
out and their outcomes, and any corrective or
disciplinary action taken. They also report
on the systematic training and implementation
measures they have initiated to foster
compliance.
All Bayer employees are required to
immediately report any violations of the
Compliance Program. In Germany, a telephone
hotline to a law firm has been set up to
allow this to be done anonymously.
Common values and leadership principles
The mission statement published in 2004
supplements the Corporate Compliance Program
and sets out the principles underlying
Bayers corporate strategy. It outlines the
foundation of our corporate philosophy and
activity to stockholders, customers,
employees and the general public. Common
values and leadership principles are
considered essential for every employees
daily work. The values include a will to succeed; a passion
for our stakeholders;
integrity, openness and
honesty; respect for
people and nature;
and the
sustainability of
our actions. The assessment of
managers
performance on the basis of defined
leadership
principles (see
graphic) helps to ensure
adherence to these
values throughout the
enterprise.
Detailed reporting
To maximize transparency, we provide regular
and timely information on the companys
position and significant changes in business
activities for stockholders, financial
analysts, stockholders associations, the
media and the general public. Bayer complies
with the recommendations of the Corporate
Governance Code by publishing reports on
business trends, earnings and the Groups
|
|
|
76 Corporate Governance
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
financial position four times a year.
The annual consolidated financial statements
of the Bayer Group are published within 90
days following the end of the fiscal year.
In addition to the annual report, quarterly
reports, news conferences and analysts
meetings, Bayer publishes the reports on Form
20-F (annual report) and Form 6-K (e. g.
quarterly report) as required by the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Bayer also uses the Internet as a platform
for timely disclosure of information,
including details of the dates of major
publications and events such as the annual
and quarterly reports and the Annual
Stockholders Meeting.
In line with the principle of fair
disclosure, we provide the same information
to all stockholders and all main target
groups. All significant new facts are
disclosed immediately. Stockholders also have
timely access to the information that Bayer
publishes in foreign countries in compliance
with local stock market regulations.
In addition to our regular reporting, we
issue ad-hoc statements on developments that
might not otherwise become publicly known but
have the potential to materially affect the
price of Bayer stock.
Investor protection in
compliance with the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
As an international company with subsidiaries
in many countries, Bayer AG is listed on a
number of stock exchanges around the world,
including the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).
It therefore has to comply not only with the
rules of the U.S. stock exchange regulator,
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC),
but also with U.S. laws such as the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act adopted by the U.S.
Congress in July 2002. This law is designed
to provide greater protection for investors
and has resulted in a variety of new
corporate governance requirements in addition
to the SEC rules.
The Bayer Group has brought its
corporate governance into line with U.S.
regulations in many respects, but further
steps are necessary in some cases. For
example, the Bayer Group is currently
extending its system of internal controls
over financial reporting to meet SEC
demands, with the aim of ensuring compliance
with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act as
of fiscal 2006. This is taking place on the
basis of the COSO model (Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission), which provides an
internationally accepted standard for
internal control systems.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 77 |
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managements Statement
of Responsibility for Financial Reporting
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
Independent Auditors Report
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of
Recognized Income and Expense
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
of the Bayer Group |
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
Key Data by Segment and Region
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
2.
|
|
General information
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
3.
|
|
Effects of new accounting pronouncements
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
4.
|
|
Basic principles of the consolidated
financial statements
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
4.1
|
|
Consolidation methods
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
4.2
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
4.3
|
|
Basic recognition and valuation principles
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
4.4
|
|
Cash flow statement
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
4.5
|
|
Procedure used in global impairment
testing and its impact
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
5.
|
|
Critical accounting policies
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
6.
|
|
Segment reporting
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
7.
|
|
Changes in the Bayer Group
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
7.1
|
|
Scope of consolidation
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
7.2
|
|
Business combinations and other acquisitions;
divestments; discontinued operations
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
Notes to the Statements of Income |
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
9.
|
|
Selling expenses
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
10.
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
11.
|
|
Other operating income
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
12.
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
13.
|
|
Costs by type
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
13.1
|
|
Costs of materials
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
13.2
|
|
Personnel expenses/employees
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
13.3
|
|
Other taxes
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
14.
|
|
Operating result (EBIT)
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
15.
|
|
Non-operating result
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
15.1
|
|
Loss from investments in
affiliated companies net
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
15.2
|
|
Interest expense net
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
15.3
|
|
Other non-operating expense net
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
16.
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
17.
|
|
Minority stockholders interest in income/losses
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
18.
|
|
Earnings per share () from continuing
and discontinued operations
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
Notes to the Balance Sheets |
|
|
|
|
|
19.
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
20.
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
21.
|
|
Investments in associates
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
22.
|
|
Other financial assets
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
23.
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
24.
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
25.
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
26.
|
|
Liquid assets
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
27.
|
|
Changes in stockholders equity
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
28.
|
|
Provisions for pensions and other
post-employment benefits
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
29.
|
|
Other provisions
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
29.1
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
29.2
|
|
Environmental protection
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
29.3
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
30.
|
|
Financial liabilities
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
31.
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
32.
|
|
Miscellaneous liabilities
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
33.
|
|
Financial instruments
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
33.1
|
|
Management of financial and commodity price risks
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
33.2
|
|
Primary financial instruments
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
33.3
|
|
Economic hedges and hedge accounting
with derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
34.
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
35.
|
|
Legal risks
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
|
Notes to the Statements of Cash Flows |
|
|
|
|
|
36.
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
37.
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
38.
|
|
Net cash used in financial activities
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
39.
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
Other information |
|
|
|
|
|
40.
|
|
Audit fees
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
41.
|
|
Related parties
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
42.
|
|
Total remuneration of the Board of Management
and the Supervisory Board, advances and loans
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
|
|
78 Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Managements Statement of Responsibility for Financial Reporting
The consolidated financial statements of the Bayer Group have been prepared by the
management, which is responsible for the substance and objectivity of the information
contained therein. The same applies to the management report, which is consistent with the financial statements.
Our financial reporting takes place according to the rules issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board, London.
Effective internal monitoring procedures instituted by Group management at the consolidated
companies along with appropriate staff training ensure the propriety of our reporting and its
compliance with legal provisions. Integrity and social responsibility form the basis of our
corporate principles and of their application in areas such as environmental protection,
quality, product safety, plant safety and adherence to local laws and regulations. The
worldwide implementation of these principles and the reliability and effectiveness of the
monitoring procedures are continuously verified by our Corporate Auditing Department.
These measures in conjunction with a uniform reporting system throughout the Group ensure that
Group companies present the management with an accurate view of their business operations,
enabling us to discern risks to our assets or fluctuations in the economic performances of
Group companies at an early stage and at the same time providing a reliable basis for the
consolidated financial statements and management report.
The Board of Management conducts the business of the Group in the interests of the
stockholders and in awareness of its responsibilities toward employees, communities and the
environment in all the countries in which we operate. Our declared aim is to deploy the
resources entrusted to us in order to increase the value of the Bayer Group as a whole.
In accordance with the resolution of the Annual Stockholders Meeting, the Supervisory Board
appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers Aktiengesellschaft Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft as the
independent auditor of the consolidated financial statements and of the statements
compliance with the International Financial Reporting Standards. The scope of the auditors
report, which appears on the following page, also includes Bayers risk management system,
audited in light of the German Law on Corporate Supervision and Transparency. The consolidated
financial statements, the management report and the auditors report were discussed in
detail, in the presence of the auditor, by the Audit Committee of the Supervisory Board and at a plenary
meeting of the Supervisory Board. The Report of the Supervisory Board appears on page 189 ff
of this Annual Report.
The Board of Management
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 79 |
Independent
Auditors Report
We have audited the consolidated financial statements prepared by Bayer
Aktiengesellschaft, Leverkusen, comprising the income statement, balance sheet, cash flow
statement, statement of recognized income and expense and the notes to the consolidated financial statements, together with the group management report, for the business year from
January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005. The preparation of the consolidated financial
statements and the group management report in accordance with the IFRS, as adopted by the
E.U., and the additional requirements of German commercial law pursuant to § (Article) 315a
Abs. (paragraph) 1 HGB (,,Handelsgesetzbuch: German Commercial Code) are the responsibility of
the parent Companys Board of Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
consolidated financial statements and on the group management report based on our audit.
We conducted our audit of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with § 317 HGB
and German generally accepted standards for the audit of financial statements promulgated by
the Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer (Institute of Public Auditors in Germany) (IDW) and
additionally observed the International Standards on Auditing (ISA). Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audit such that misstatements materially affecting the
presentation of the net assets, financial position and results of operations in the
consolidated financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial reporting
framework and in the group management report are detected with reasonable assurance. Knowledge
of the business activities and the economic and legal environment of the Group and
expectations as to possible misstatements are taken into account in the determination of audit
procedures. The effectiveness of the accounting-related internal control system and the
evidence supporting the disclosures in the consolidated financial statements and the group
management report are examined primarily on a test basis within the framework of the audit.
The audit includes assessing the annual financial statements of those entities included in
consolidation, the determination of the entities to be included in consolidation, the
accounting and consolidation principles used and significant
estimates made by the Companys
Board of Management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements and the group management report. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
Our audit has not led to any reservations.
In our opinion based on the findings of our audit the consolidated financial statements
comply with the IFRS as adopted by the E.U., the additional requirements of German commercial
law pursuant to § 315a Abs. 1 HGB and give a true and fair view of the net assets, financial
position and results of operations of the Group in accordance with these requirements. The
group management report is consistent with the consolidated financial statements and as a
whole provides a suitable view of the Groups position and suitably presents the opportunities
and risks of future development.
Essen, March 1, 2006
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Aktiengesellschaft
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft
|
|
|
P. Albrecht
|
|
V. Linke |
Wirtschaftsprüfer
|
|
Wirtschaftsprüfer |
|
|
|
80 Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Bayer Group Consolidated Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note |
|
|
20041 |
|
|
2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
[8 |
] |
|
|
23,278 |
|
|
|
27,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,421 |
) |
|
|
(15,027 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,857 |
|
|
|
12,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling expenses |
|
|
[9 |
] |
|
|
(5,240 |
) |
|
|
(5,713 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
[10 |
] |
|
|
(1,927 |
) |
|
|
(1,886 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General administration expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,421 |
) |
|
|
(1,444 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income |
|
|
[11 |
] |
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
[12 |
] |
|
|
(1,134 |
) |
|
|
(1,295 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating result [EBIT] |
|
|
[14 |
] |
|
|
1,875 |
|
|
|
2,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity-method loss |
|
|
[15.1 |
] |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(997 |
) |
|
|
(1,237 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating result |
|
|
[15 |
] |
|
|
(653 |
) |
|
|
(613 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,222 |
|
|
|
2,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
[16 |
] |
|
|
(473 |
) |
|
|
(641 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations after taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
1,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations after taxes |
|
|
[7.2 |
] |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income after taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
1,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which attributable to minority interest |
|
|
[17 |
] |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which attributable to Bayer AG stockholders (net income) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share () |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.94 |
|
|
|
2.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From continuing operations |
|
|
[18 |
] |
|
|
1.03 |
|
|
|
2.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.03 |
|
|
|
2.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.03 |
|
|
|
2.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From continuing and discontinued operations |
|
|
[18 |
] |
|
|
0.94 |
|
|
|
2.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.94 |
|
|
|
2.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.94 |
|
|
|
2.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
|
Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 81 |
Bayer Group Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note |
|
|
Dec. 31, 20041 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
|
[19 |
] |
|
|
5,952 |
|
|
|
7,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
[20 |
] |
|
|
7,662 |
|
|
|
8,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in associates |
|
|
[21 |
] |
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial assets |
|
|
[22 |
] |
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
|
1,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other receivables |
|
|
[23 |
] |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
[16 |
] |
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
1,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,859 |
|
|
|
20,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
[24 |
] |
|
|
4,738 |
|
|
|
5,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable |
|
|
[25 |
] |
|
|
4,475 |
|
|
|
5,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial assets |
|
|
[22 |
] |
|
|
794 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other receivables |
|
|
[23 |
] |
|
|
1,543 |
|
|
|
1,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims for tax refunds |
|
|
[16 |
] |
|
|
823 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquid assets |
|
|
[26 |
] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities and other instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,570 |
|
|
|
3,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,972 |
|
|
|
16,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held for sale and discontinued operations |
|
|
[7.2 |
] |
|
|
4,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,729 |
|
|
|
16,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,588 |
|
|
|
36,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity attributable to Bayer AG stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock of Bayer AG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,870 |
|
|
|
1,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital reserves of Bayer AG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,942 |
|
|
|
2,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other reserves |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,399 |
|
|
|
6,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(379 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,832 |
|
|
|
11,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity attributable to minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
[27 |
] |
|
|
10,943 |
|
|
|
11,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions for pensions and other post-employment benefits |
|
|
[28 |
] |
|
|
6,219 |
|
|
|
7,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other provisions |
|
|
[29 |
] |
|
|
1,204 |
|
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities |
|
|
[30 |
] |
|
|
7,025 |
|
|
|
7,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous liabilities |
|
|
[32 |
] |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
[16 |
] |
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,295 |
|
|
|
16,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other provisions |
|
|
[29 |
] |
|
|
2,707 |
|
|
|
3,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities |
|
|
[30 |
] |
|
|
2,166 |
|
|
|
1,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
|
[31 |
] |
|
|
1,759 |
|
|
|
1,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax liabilities |
|
|
[16 |
] |
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous liabilities |
|
|
[32 |
] |
|
|
1,918 |
|
|
|
2,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,963 |
|
|
|
9,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities directly related to assets held for sale
and discontinued operations |
|
|
[7.2 |
] |
|
|
2,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,350 |
|
|
|
9,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,645 |
|
|
|
25,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,588 |
|
|
|
36,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82 Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Bayer Group Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note |
|
|
20041 |
|
|
2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating result [EBIT] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,875 |
|
|
|
2,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(490 |
) |
|
|
(541 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,959 |
|
|
|
1,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in pension provisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(424 |
) |
|
|
(586 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gains) losses on retirements of noncurrent assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cash flow2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,885 |
|
|
|
3,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(425 |
) |
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in trade accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(404 |
) |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in trade accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in other working capital, other non-cash items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
(net cash flow, continuing operations) |
|
|
[36 |
] |
|
|
2,262 |
|
|
|
3,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
(net cash flow, discontinued operations) |
|
|
[7.2 |
] |
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
(net cash flow, total) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,450 |
|
|
|
3,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash outflows for additions to property, plant,
equipment and intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,251 |
) |
|
|
(1,389 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash inflows from sales of property, plant, equipment and other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash inflows from sales of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash outflows for acquisitions less acquired cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(358 |
) |
|
|
(2,188 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and dividends received |
|
|
|
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash inflows from (outflows for) marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (total) |
|
|
[37 |
] |
|
|
(814 |
) |
|
|
(1,741 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer AG dividend and dividend payments to minority stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(559 |
) |
|
|
(440 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
|
2,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirements of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(881 |
) |
|
|
(2,659 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
(787 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (total) |
|
|
[38 |
] |
|
|
(761 |
) |
|
|
(1,881 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents due to business activities (total) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,734 |
|
|
|
3,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents due to
changes in scope of consolidation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents due to exchange rate movements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
|
[39 |
] |
|
|
3,570 |
|
|
|
3,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities and other instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquid assets as per balance sheets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,599 |
|
|
|
3,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
2004 figures restated |
|
2 |
|
For definition see Bayer Group Key Data on front flap |
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 83 |
Bayer Group Consolidated Statements of Recognized Income and Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair values of hedging instruments, recognized in stockholders equity |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) on hedging instruments, recognized in the income statement |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair values of available-for-sale securities, recognized in stockholders equity |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, recognized in the income statement |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revaluation surplus (IFRS 3) |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial gains (losses) on defined benefit obligations
for pensions and other post-employment benefits |
|
|
(740 |
) |
|
|
(1,207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences on translation of operations outside the euro zone |
|
|
(304 |
) |
|
|
857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes on valuation adjustments, recognized directly in stockholders equity |
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes on valuation adjustments, removed from stockholders equity
and recognized in the income statement |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation adjustments recognized directly in stockholders equity |
|
|
(655 |
) |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income after taxes |
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
1,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income and expense recognized in the financial statements |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
1,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which attributable to minority interest |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which attributable to Bayer AG stockholders |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
1,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
1. Key Data by Segment and Region
Segments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
million |
|
Health Care |
|
|
|
Pharmaceuticals, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diabetes Care, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Biological Products |
|
|
Consumer Care |
|
|
Diagnostics |
|
|
Animal Health |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales (external) |
|
|
3,961 |
|
|
|
4,067 |
|
|
|
1,336 |
|
|
|
2,355 |
|
|
|
1,975 |
|
|
|
2,151 |
|
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
-9.4 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
-4.8 |
% |
|
|
76.3 |
% |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
-0.5 |
% |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in local currencies |
|
|
-5.9 |
% |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
75.2 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment sales |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating result [EBIT] |
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on sales |
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
20.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cash flow* |
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital invested |
|
|
2,305 |
|
|
|
2,501 |
|
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
2,860 |
|
|
|
1,817 |
|
|
|
1,978 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CFROl* |
|
|
16.8 |
% |
|
|
18.7 |
% |
|
|
20.1 |
% |
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
|
16.9 |
% |
|
|
27.2 |
% |
|
|
36.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow* |
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity-method income (loss) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity-method investments |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
4,052 |
|
|
|
3,489 |
|
|
|
1,287 |
|
|
|
3,621 |
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
1,955 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization and depreciation |
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
2,138 |
|
|
|
2,086 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
748 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of employees (as of Dec. 31) |
|
|
18,400 |
|
|
|
16,900 |
|
|
|
3,800 |
|
|
|
6,800 |
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
7,100 |
|
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
million |
|
Europe |
|
|
North America |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales (external) by market |
|
|
9,775 |
|
|
|
11,930 |
|
|
|
6,512 |
|
|
|
7,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
22.0 |
% |
|
|
-6.7 |
% |
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in local currencies |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
21.9 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales (external) by point of origin |
|
|
10,646 |
|
|
|
12,912 |
|
|
|
6,570 |
|
|
|
7,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
21.3 |
% |
|
|
-6.5 |
% |
|
|
12.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in local currencies |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
21.1 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interregional sales |
|
|
3,512 |
|
|
|
3,933 |
|
|
|
1,690 |
|
|
|
1,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income |
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating result [EBIT] |
|
|
953 |
|
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on sales |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
12.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cash flow* |
|
|
1,503 |
|
|
|
1,733 |
|
|
|
770 |
|
|
|
1,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity-method income (loss) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity-method investments |
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
19,118 |
|
|
|
20,294 |
|
|
|
7,684 |
|
|
|
8,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
606 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization and depreciation |
|
|
1,173 |
|
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
16,058 |
|
|
|
17,638 |
|
|
|
5,328 |
|
|
|
5,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
1,322 |
|
|
|
1,228 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of employees (as of Dec. 31) |
|
|
51,400 |
|
|
|
52,400 |
|
|
|
17,800 |
|
|
|
16,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
for definition see Bayer Group Key Data on front flap |
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
million |
|
CropScience |
|
|
Material Science |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing |
|
|
|
Crop Protection |
|
|
Science, BioScience |
|
|
Materials |
|
|
Systems |
|
|
Reconciliation |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales (external) |
|
|
4,957 |
|
|
|
4,874 |
|
|
|
989 |
|
|
|
1,022 |
|
|
|
3,248 |
|
|
|
4,086 |
|
|
|
5,349 |
|
|
|
6,609 |
|
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
1,363 |
|
|
|
23,278 |
|
|
|
27,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
-1.7 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
17.0 |
% |
|
|
25.8 |
% |
|
|
14.4 |
% |
|
|
23.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
17.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in local currencies |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
-4.3 |
% |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
22.1 |
% |
|
|
25.5 |
% |
|
|
18.8 |
% |
|
|
22.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
16.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment sales |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
(266 |
) |
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating result [EBIT] |
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
(349 |
) |
|
|
1,875 |
|
|
|
2.812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on sales |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
15.5 |
% |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
15.5 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cash flow* |
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
762 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
2,885 |
|
|
|
3,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital invested |
|
|
6,932 |
|
|
|
7,372 |
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
|
|
1,477 |
|
|
|
3,645 |
|
|
|
4,325 |
|
|
|
4,344 |
|
|
|
4,791 |
|
|
|
3,684 |
|
|
|
2,848 |
|
|
|
25,365 |
|
|
|
28,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CFROl* |
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
|
13.8 |
% |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
|
17.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
12.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow* |
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
871 |
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
2,262 |
|
|
|
3,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity-method income (loss) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity-method investments |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
9,117 |
|
|
|
8,836 |
|
|
|
1,703 |
|
|
|
1,591 |
|
|
|
3,789 |
|
|
|
4,314 |
|
|
|
4,724 |
|
|
|
5,125 |
|
|
|
5,796 |
|
|
|
7,149 |
|
|
|
32,831 |
|
|
|
36,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
977 |
|
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization and depreciation |
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
1,959 |
|
|
|
1,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
2,450 |
|
|
|
2,668 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
1,632 |
|
|
|
15,477 |
|
|
|
15,815 |
|
|
|
24,258 |
|
|
|
25,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1,927 |
|
|
|
1,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
employees (as of Dec. 31) |
|
|
16,500 |
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
9,100 |
|
|
|
9,300 |
|
|
|
8,800 |
|
|
|
9,500 |
|
|
|
22,300 |
|
|
|
22,300 |
|
|
|
91,700 |
|
|
|
93,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latin America/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing |
|
|
|
Asia/Pacific |
|
|
Africa/Middle East |
|
|
Reconciliation |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales (external) by market |
|
|
3,962 |
|
|
|
4,578 |
|
|
|
3,029 |
|
|
|
3,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,278 |
|
|
|
27,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
15.5 |
% |
|
|
12.1 |
% |
|
|
16.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
17.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in local currencies |
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
|
14.8 |
% |
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
16.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales (external) by point of origin |
|
|
3,708 |
|
|
|
4,383 |
|
|
|
2,354 |
|
|
|
2,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,278 |
|
|
|
27,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
18.2 |
% |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
|
14.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
17.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in local currencies |
|
|
14.9 |
% |
|
|
17.4 |
% |
|
|
18.6 |
% |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
16.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interregional sales |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
(5,514 |
) |
|
|
(6,220 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating result [EBIT] |
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
1,875 |
|
|
|
2,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on sales |
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
16.8 |
% |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cash flow* |
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
2,885 |
|
|
|
3,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity-method income (loss) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity-method investments |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
2,754 |
|
|
|
3,904 |
|
|
|
1,885 |
|
|
|
2,423 |
|
|
|
1,390 |
|
|
|
1,902 |
|
|
|
32,831 |
|
|
|
36,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
977 |
|
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization and depreciation |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
1,959 |
|
|
|
1,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
987 |
|
|
|
1,088 |
|
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
1,007 |
|
|
|
1,143 |
|
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
24,258 |
|
|
|
25,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,927 |
|
|
|
1,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
employees (as of Dec. 31) |
|
|
12,200 |
|
|
|
13,900 |
|
|
|
10,300 |
|
|
|
11,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,700 |
|
|
|
93,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
for definition see Bayer Group Key Data on front flap |
|
|
|
86 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
2. General information
The consolidated financial statements of the Bayer Group are prepared pursuant to
Article 315a of the German Commercial Code according to the International Financial
Reporting Standards of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), London, and the
Interpretations of the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC), in
effect at the closing date. Publication approval by the Supervisory Board takes place on
March 2, 2006. Since 2002 the term International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) has
been used to refer to the body of accounting and reporting standards compiled by the
International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), London. It thus replaces the term
International Accounting Standards. However, standards issued prior to the name change
continue to be referred to as IAS.
Bayer is a global enterprise based in Germany. Its business activities in the fields of
health care, nutrition and high-tech materials are divided among the Bayer HealthCare, Bayer
CropScience and Bayer MaterialScience subgroups, respectively (see Note [6]: Segment
Reporting).
A Declaration of Conformity with the German Corporate Governance Code has been issued pursuant
to §161 of the German Stock Corporation Act and made available to stockholders.
The Group financial statements are based on the principle of the historical cost of
acquisition, construction or production, with the exception of certain items such as
available-for-sale financial assets and derivative financial instruments, which are reflected at fair value. The financial statements of the consolidated companies are prepared
according to uniform recognition and valuation principles. Valuation adjustments made for tax
reasons are not reflected in the Group statements. The individual companies statements are
prepared as of the closing date for the Group statements.
The consolidated financial statements of the Bayer Group are drawn up in euros (). Amounts
are stated in millions of euros ( million) except where otherwise indicated.
The income statement is prepared using the cost-of-sales method.
In the income statement and balance sheet, certain items are combined for the sake of clarity,
as explained in the Notes. The previous version of IAS 1 allowed the option of classifying
assets and liabilities either according to maturity or in order of liquidity. The revised
version of IAS 1, developed as part of the IASB improvements project, prescribes classification according to maturity starting with the 2005 fiscal year. Assets and liabilities are
classified as current if they mature within one year.
Accordingly, assets and liabilities are classified as noncurrent if they remain in the Bayer
Group for more than one year. Trade accounts receivable and payable and inventories are always
presented as current items, deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent items.
Third parties minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries are no longer shown as a
separate item between equity and liabilities, but recognized as part of stockholders equity.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 87 |
In compliance with IFRS 5, which was approved by the IASB on March 31, 2004, the distinction
between continuing operations and discontinued operations or assets held for sale is drawn
differently starting on January 1, 2005 than in the financial statements as of December 31,
2004. Assets, liabilities, income and expense relating to discontinued operations are
disclosed separately in the balance sheet and income statement. All data in these Notes refer
to continuing operations, except where otherwise indicated. Discontinued operations are
described in Note [7.2].
Changes in recognition and valuation principles are explained in the Notes. The retrospective
application of new or revised standards requires except as otherwise provided in the
respective standard that the amounts recognized in the financial statements for the
preceding annual period and the opening balance sheet for the reporting period be restated as
if the new recognition and valuation principles had been applied in the past. The financial
statements as of December 31, 2004 have therefore been restated in line with the new and
revised standards applied by the Bayer Group as of January 1, 2005.
3. Effects of new accounting pronouncements
Accounting standards applied for the first time in 2005
Material effects of reporting changes on earnings per share are explained in Note [18].
The consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2005 comply with the following new or
revised International Financial Reporting Standards: IAS 1 (Presentation of Financial
Statements), IAS 2 (Inventories), IAS 8 (Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates
and Errors), IAS 10 (Events After the Balance Sheet Date), IAS 16 (Property, Plant and
Equipment), IAS 17 (Leases), IAS 21 (The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates), IAS 24
(Related Party Disclosures), IAS 27 (Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements), IAS 28
(Investments in Associates), IAS 31 (Interests in Joint Ventures), IAS 32 (Financial
Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation), IAS 33 (Earnings per Share), IAS 39 (Financial
Instruments: Recognition and Measurement) and IAS 40 (Investment Property). The revised
standards supersede the previous versions and apply for annual periods beginning on or after
January 1, 2005.
In February 2004, the IASB issued International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 2
(Share-based Payment), which deals with accounting for share-based payment transactions,
including grants of share options to employees. IFRS 2 specifies the financial reporting by
an entity when it undertakes a share-based payment transaction and requires an entity to reflect in its profit or loss and financial position the effects of share-based payment
transactions, including expenses associated with transactions in which share options are
granted to employees. The first-time application of IFRS 2 led to a 7 million pre-tax
adjustment to the value of existing obligations under stock-based compensation programs as of
January 1, 2005. The adjustment resulting from measuring these obligations retrospectively at
fair value instead of intrinsic value includes a pre-tax amount of 3 million pertaining to
the 2004 fiscal year.
|
|
|
88 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
In March 2004, the IASB issued IFRS 3 (Business Combinations) to replace IAS 22 (Business
Combinations). IFRS 3 requires all business combinations within its scope to be accounted for
by applying the purchase method of accounting. The pooling of interests method is prohibited.
At the acquisition date, the acquirees identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent
liabilities are to be recognized at fair value. It requires that goodwill no longer be
amortized but tested annually for impairment. IFRS 3 is applied to business combinations for
which the agreement date is on or after March 31, 2004. For goodwill and other intangible
assets acquired in a business combination for which the agreement date was prior to March 31,
2004, the standard must be applied prospectively from the beginning of the first annual
period beginning on or after March 31, 2004.
In March 2004, in connection with the issuance of IFRS 3, the IASB revised IAS 36 (Impairment
of Assets) and IAS 38 (Intangible Assets). The main revisions require goodwill and other
indefinite-lived intangible assets to be tested for impairment annually, or more frequently
if events or changes in circumstances indicate a possible impairment, prohibit reversal of
impairment losses for goodwill, require an intangible asset to be treated as having an indefinite useful life when there is no foreseeable limit on the period over which the asset is
expected to generate net cash inflows for the entity, and prohibit the amortization of such
assets. The revised standards are effective for goodwill and other intangible assets acquired
in business combinations for which the agreement date is on or after March 31, 2004 and for
all other such assets for annual periods beginning on or after March 31, 2004. The new
standard has been applied prospectively, i.e. the new recognition and valuation principles are
applied only in the current statements and not for the preceding period. Had the new standard
been applicable for the 2004 fiscal year, the absence of amortization of goodwill and other
indefinite-lived intangible assets would have reduced operating expense by 185 million.
In March 2004, the IASB issued IFRS 5 (Non-Current Assets Held For Sale and Discontinued
Operations), which contains specific recognition principles for assets and liabilities held
for sale and for discontinued operations. To improve transparency and comparability, the
Groups financial reporting is based primarily on continuing operations, while assets held
for sale and discontinued operations are stated separately in a single line item in the
balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement. The distinction between continuing
operations and discontinued operations or assets held for sale is thus drawn differently
starting on January 1, 2005 than in the financial statements as of December 31, 2004.
In March 2004, the IASB issued an amendment to IAS 39 (Financial Instruments: Recognition and
Measurement). The amendment simplifies the implementation of IAS 39 by enabling fair value hedge accounting
to be used more readily for portfolio hedging of interest rate risk than under previous
versions of IAS 39.
In May 2004, the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) issued
IFRIC Interpretation 1 (Changes in Existing Decommissioning, Restoration and Similar
Liabilities). The interpretation
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 89 |
addresses the accounting for changes in cash outflows and discount rates, and increases
resulting from the passage of time in existing decommissioning, restoration, and similar
liabilities that are recognized both as part of the cost of an item of property, plant and
equipment and as a provision.
In November 2004, the IFRIC released an amendment to SIC-12 (Consolidation Special Purpose
Entities). The amendment removes SIC-12s scope exception for equity compensation
plans, thereby requiring an entity that controls an employee benefit trust (or similar
entity) set up for the purpose of a share-based payment arrangement to consolidate that trust
upon adopting IFRS 2 (Share-based Payment). Further, it amends the scope exclusion in SIC-12
for post-employment benefit plans to include other long-term employee benefit plans in order
to ensure consistency with the requirements of IAS 19 (Employee Benefits).
In December 2004, the IASB published an amendment to IAS 19 (Employee Benefits). The
amendment introduces an additional recognition option that permits immediate recognition of
actuarial gains and losses arising in defined benefit plans. The option is similar to the
approach provided in the U.K. standard FRS 17 (Retirement Benefits), which requires
recognition of all actuarial gains and losses in a statement of total recognized gains and
losses that is separate from the income statement. Other features of the amendment include
(1) a clarification that a contractual agreement between a multi-employer plan and
participating employers that determines how a surplus is to be distributed or a deficit
funded will give rise to an asset or liability, (2) accounting requirements for group defined
benefit plans in the separate or individual financial statements of entities within a
group, and (3) additional disclosure requirements.
Previously, in the Bayer Group statements, the net cumulative amounts of actuarial gains and
losses outside of the corridor that were reflected in the balance sheet at the end of the
previous reporting period were recognized in the income statement as income or expense,
respectively, over the average remaining service period of existing employees. This corridor
was 10 percent of the present value of the defined benefit obligation or 10 percent of the
fair value of plan assets, whichever was greater at the end of the previous year. Under the
new method of post-employment benefit accounting, unrealized actuarial gains and losses,
instead of being gradually amortized according to the corridor method and recognized in
income, are offset in their entirety against stockholders equity. Thus, no amortization of
actuarial gains and losses is recognized in income.
Recognizing actuarial gains and losses in stockholders equity affects the amounts of assets
and of provisions for pensions and other post-employment benefits stated in the balance sheet
and also requires the recognition of deferred taxes on the resulting differences. These taxes,
too, are offset against the corresponding equity items. The Group Management Board has decided
to follow the recommendation of the IASB and implement the above change as of January 1, 2005
in order to enhance the transparency of reporting. The previous years figures have been
restated accordingly. This reporting change improves the 2004 operating result from continuing
operations by 48 million and the non-operating result by
|
|
|
90 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
78 million, but also gives rise to a deferred tax expense of 50 million. In view of its
immateriality to 2004 EBIT of the segments, the 48 million gain has been reflected solely in
the reconciliation column of the segment table. These non-cash reporting changes do not affect
either gross or net cash flow.
The impact of the change on the relevant balance sheet items as of December 31, 2004 was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount |
|
|
Impact |
|
|
Carrying amount |
|
|
|
before the change |
|
|
of change |
|
|
after the change |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit plan assets in excess of obligations |
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
936 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held for sale and discontinued operations |
|
|
4,788 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
4,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity and Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other reserves |
|
|
7,452 |
|
|
|
(1,432 |
) |
|
|
6,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions for pensions and other post-employment benefits |
|
|
4,581 |
|
|
|
1,638 |
|
|
|
6,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
1,171 |
|
|
|
(527 |
) |
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities directly related to assets held for sale and
discontinued operations |
|
|
2,282 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
2,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In April 2005, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued an amendment to
IAS 39 (Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement) to permit the foreign currency
risk of a highly probable forecast intragroup transaction to qualify as the hedged item in
consolidated financial statements provided that the transaction is denominated in a
currency other than the functional currency of the entity entering into that transaction and
the foreign currency risk will affect consolidated profit or loss. The amendment also specifies that if the hedge of a forecast intragroup transaction qualifies for hedge accounting, any
gain or loss that is recognized directly in equity in accordance with the hedge accounting
rules in IAS 39 must be reclassified into profit or loss in the same period or periods
during which the foreign currency risk of the hedged transaction affects consolidated profit
or loss. The amendments shall be applied for annual periods beginning on or after January 1,
2006. The Bayer Group has early adopted this standard and is applying the interpretation in
its current financial statements. The adoption has not had a material impact on the Groups
shareholders equity, financial position or results of operations.
In June 2005, the IASB issued a further amendment to IAS 39 (Financial Instruments:
Recognition and Measurement). This amendment introduces a restriction to the use of the option
of designating any financial asset or any financial liability to be measured at fair value
through profit or loss (the fair value option). The amendment limits the use of this option
to financial instruments that meet certain conditions. Those conditions are that: (1) the
fair value option designation eliminates or significantly reduces a measurement or
recognition inconsistency, (2) a group of financial assets, financial liabilities, or both
are managed and their performance is evaluated on a fair value basis in accordance with a
documented risk management or investment strategy, and (3) an instrument contains an embedded
derivative that
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 91 |
meets particular conditions. The amendment shall be applied for annual periods beginning on or
after January 1, 2006. The Bayer Group has early adopted this amendment and applied it in its
2005 financial statements. The adoption has not had a material impact on the Groups
shareholders equity, financial position or results of operations.
Newly issued accounting standards
In December 2004, the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC)
issued IFRIC Interpretation 5, Rights to Interests Arising From Decommissioning, Restoration
and Environmental Rehabilitation Funds. The interpretation addresses how to account for
obligations to decommission assets for which a company contributes to a fund established to
meet the costs of the decommissioning or environmental rehabilitation. IFRIC 5 is to be
applied for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2006. The Bayer Group does not
believe that the application of this standard will have a material impact on the Groups financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In August 2005, the IASB amended requirements for financial guarantee contracts through
limited amendments to IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, and IFRS
4, Insurance Contracts. The amendments require the issuer of a financial guarantee
contract to measure the contract initially at fair value, and subsequently at the higher of
(a) the amount determined in accordance with IAS 37, Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets, and (b) the amount initially
recognized less, when appropriate, cumulative amortization recognized in accordance with IAS
18, Revenue. If an issuer has previously asserted explicitly that it regards such contracts
as insurance contracts and has used accounting applicable to insurance contracts, the issuer
may elect to apply to such contracts the accounting model described above or elect to account
for such contracts under IFRS 4. The amendments shall be applied for annual periods beginning
on or after January 1, 2006. The Bayer Group does not believe that the application of this
standard will have a material impact on the Groups financial position, results of operations
or cash flows.
In September 2005, the IFRIC issued IFRIC Interpretation 6, Liabilities Arising from
Participating in a Specific Market Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment. The
interpretation addresses when certain producers of electrical goods are required to recognize
a liability for the cost of waste management relating to the decommissioning of waste
electrical and electronic equipment (historical waste) supplied to private households. The
IFRIC concluded that the event giving rise to the liability for cost of such historical waste,
and thus its recognition, is participating in the market during a measurement period. IFRIC 6
is to be applied for annual periods beginning on or after December 1, 2005. The Bayer Group is
currently evaluating the impact the standard will have on the Groups financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
In November 2005 the IFRIC issued IFRIC 7 (Applying the Restatement Approach under IAS 29
(Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies). IFRIC clarifies how comparative
amounts in an entitys financial statements should be restated when the economy of the
country whose currency is the entitys functional currency becomes hyperinflationary. The
IFRIC agreed that when hyperinflationary status is
|
|
|
92 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
reached, an entity must restate its financial statements as though the economy had always
been hyperinflationary. IFRIC 7 also provides guidance on how deferred tax items in the
opening balance sheet should be restated. The Bayer Group is currently evaluating the impact
the standard will have on the Groups financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
4. Basic principles of the consolidated financial statements
4.1 Consolidation methods
Capital consolidation is performed according to IAS 27 (Consolidated and Separate Financial
Statements) by offsetting investments in subsidiaries against the underlying equity at the
dates of acquisition. The identifiable assets and liabilities (including contingent
liabilities) of subsidiaries and joint ventures are included at their fair values in
proportion to Bayers interest. Remaining differences are recognized as goodwill. Fair value
adjustments of the assets and liabilities concerned are amortized together with the
corresponding assets and liabilities in subsequent periods.
Where financial statements of consolidated companies recorded write-downs or write-backs of
investments in other consolidated companies, these are eliminated for the Group statements.
Intragroup sales, profits, losses, income, expenses, receivables and payables are
eliminated.
Deferred taxes are recognized for temporary differences related to
consolidation entries.
Joint ventures are included by proportionate consolidation
according to the same principles.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of those companies in which Bayer
AG directly or indirectly has a majority of the voting rights (subsidiaries) or from which it
is able to derive the greater part of the economic benefit and bears the greater part of the
risk by virtue of its power to govern corporate financial and operating policies, generally
through an ownership interest greater than 50 percent. Inclusion of such companies accounts in the consolidated financial statements
begins when Bayer AG starts to exercise control over the company and ceases when it is no
longer able to do so. Subsidiaries and joint ventures that do not have a material impact on
the Groups net worth or financial position, either individually or on aggregate, are not
consolidated but recognized at fair value, which generally corresponds to amortized cost.
However, investments in material entities in which Bayer AG exerts significant influence,
generally through an ownership interest between 20 and 50 percent (associates), are accounted
for by the equity method. The cost of acquisition of an associate is adjusted annually by the
percentage of any change in its stockholders equity corresponding to Bayers percentage
interest in the company. Any goodwill arising from the first-time inclusion of companies at
equity is accounted for in the same way as goodwill relating to fully consolidated
companies. The financial statements of associates are prepared according to uniform
recognition and valuation principles. Bayers share of the changes in these companies
stockholders equities that are recognized in their income
statements including write-downs
of goodwill are recognized in the Bayer Group consolidated income statement in the
operating result. Intercompany profits and losses on transactions with associates were
immaterial in 2005 and 2004. Participations of
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 93 |
between 20 and 50 percent that do not have a material impact on the Groups financial
position, results of operations or cash flows, either individually or on aggregate, are not
included at equity but at the lower of amortized cost or fair value. Further information on
associates can be found in Note [21].
4.2 Foreign currency translation
In the financial statements of the individual consolidated companies, foreign currency
receivables and payables are translated at closing rates, irrespective of whether they are
exchange-hedged. Forward contracts that, from an economic point of view, serve as a hedge
against fluctuations in exchange rates are stated at fair value.
The majority of consolidated companies outside the euro zone are to be regarded as foreign
entities since they are financially, economically and organizationally autonomous. Their
functional currencies according to IAS 21 (The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates)
are thus the respective local currencies. The assets and liabilities of these companies are
therefore translated at closing rates, while income and expense items are translated at
average rates for the year.
Where the operations of a company outside the euro zone are integral to those of Bayer AG, the
functional currency is the euro. Property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, investments
in affiliated companies and other securities included in investments are translated at the
historical exchange rates on the dates of addition, along with any relevant amortization,
depreciation and write-downs. All other balance sheet items are translated at closing rates.
Income and expense items (except amortization, depreciation and write-downs) are translated at
average rates for the year.
Exchange differences arising from the translation of foreign companies balance sheets are
shown in a separate stockholders equity item.
In case of divestiture, the respective exchange differences are reversed and recognized in income.
The exchange rates for major currencies against the euro varied as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing rate |
|
|
Average rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Argentina |
|
ARS |
|
|
4.05 |
|
|
|
3.57 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
3.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
|
BRL |
|
|
3.62 |
|
|
|
2.76 |
|
|
|
3.64 |
|
|
|
3.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.K. |
|
GBP |
|
|
0.71 |
|
|
|
0.69 |
|
|
|
0.68 |
|
|
|
0.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan |
|
JPY |
|
|
139.65 |
|
|
|
138.90 |
|
|
|
134.40 |
|
|
|
136.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada |
|
CAD |
|
|
1.64 |
|
|
|
1.37 |
|
|
|
1.62 |
|
|
|
1.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexico |
|
MXN |
|
|
15.23 |
|
|
|
12.59 |
|
|
|
14.04 |
|
|
|
13.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Switzerland |
|
CHF |
|
|
1.54 |
|
|
|
1.56 |
|
|
|
1.54 |
|
|
|
1.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.A. |
|
USD |
|
|
1.36 |
|
|
|
1.18 |
|
|
|
1.24 |
|
|
|
1.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
4.3 Basic recognition and valuation principles
Net sales and other operating income
Sales are recognized upon transfer of risk or rendering of services to third parties and are
reported net of sales taxes and rebates. Revenues from contracts that contain customer
acceptance provisions are deferred until customer acceptance occurs.
Where sales of products or services involve the provision of multiple elements which may
contain different remuneration arrangements such as prepayments, milestone payments, etc.
for example research and development alliances and co-promotion agreements they are
assessed to determine whether separate delivery of the individual elements of such
arrangements comprises more than one unit of accounting. The delivered elements are separated
if (1) they have value to the customer on a stand-alone basis, (2) there is objective and
reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered element(s) and (3) if the arrangement
includes a general right of return relative to the delivered element(s), delivery or
performance of the undelivered element(s) is considered probable and substantially in the
control of the company. If all three criteria are fulfilled, the appropriate revenue
recognition convention is then applied to each separate accounting unit.
Allocations to provisions for rebates to customers are recognized in the period in which the
related sales are recorded. These amounts are deducted from net sales. Payments relating to
the sale or outlicensing of technologies or technological expertise once the respective
agreements have become effective are immediately recognized in income if all rights to the
technologies and all obligations resulting from them have been relinquished under the contract
terms and Bayer has no continuing obligation to perform under the agreement. However, if
rights to the technologies continue to exist or obligations resulting from them have yet to be
fulfilled, the payments received are recorded in line with the actual circumstances.
Upfront payments and similar non-refundable payments received under these agreements are
recorded as deferred revenue and recognized in income over the estimated performance period
stipulated in the agreement. Non-refundable milestone payments linked to the achievement of a
significant and substantive technical/regulatory hurdle in the research and development
process, pursuant to collaborative agreements, are recognized as revenue upon the achievement
of the specified milestone. Revenues such as license fees, rentals, interest income or
dividends are recognized according to the same principles.
Research and development expenses
A substantial proportion of the Bayer Groups financial resources is invested in research and
development. This is necessary to maintain continued success in the research- and
technology-intensive markets in which it operates. In addition to in-house research and
development activities, especially in the health care business, various research and
development collaborations and alliances are maintained with third parties involving the
provision of funding and/or payments for the achievement of performance milestones.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 95 |
For accounting purposes, research expenses are defined as costs incurred for current or
planned investigations undertaken with the prospect of gaining new scientific or technical knowledge and
understanding. Development expenses are defined as costs incurred for the application of
research findings or specialist knowledge to production, production methods, services or
goods prior to the commencement of commercial production or use. All research costs are
expensed as incurred. According to IAS 38 (Intangible Assets), research costs cannot be
capitalized; development costs must be capitalized if, and only if, specific, narrowly defined conditions are fulfilled. Development costs must be capitalized if it is sufficiently
certain that the future economic benefits to the company will cover not only the usual
production, selling and administrative costs but also the development costs themselves.
Since development projects are subject to regulatory approvals and other imponderables, the
conditions for the capitalization of costs incurred prior to the approval are also not satisfied and the respective costs are therefore expensed as incurred. With respect to costs
incurred in collaborations and alliances with third parties, considerable judgment is involved
in assessing whether milestone-based payments simply reflect the funding of research, in
which case expensing is always required, or whether, by making a milestone payment, an asset
is acquired. In the latter case, the relevant costs are to be capitalized.
The following costs in particular, by their very nature, constitute research and development
expenses: the appropriate allocations of direct personnel and material costs and related
overheads for internal or external application technology, engineering and other departments
that provide the respective services; costs for experimental and pilot facilities (including
depreciation of buildings or parts of buildings used for research or development purposes);
costs for clinical research; regular costs for the utilization of third parties patents for
research and development purposes; other taxes related to research facilities; and fees for
the filing and registration of self-generated patents that are not capitalized.
Goodwill and other intangible assets
Acquired intangible assets with the exception of goodwill and other indefinite-lived
assets are recognized at cost and amortized by the straight-line method over a period of 3
to 30 years, depending on their estimated useful lives. Write-downs are made for impairment
losses. Investments are written back if the reasons for previous years write-downs no longer
apply. Such write-backs, however, must not cause the net carrying amounts of the assets to
exceed the amortized cost at which they would have been recognized if the write-downs had not
been made. Amortization for 2005 has been allocated to the cost of goods sold, selling
expenses, research and development expenses or general administration expenses. Amortization
of other intangible assets in 2005 totaled 622 million (2004: 577 million).
|
|
|
96 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
The Bayer Cross trademark, which Bayer had been unable to use in the United States and
Canada since its confiscation at the end of the First World War but which was reacquired in
1994 and thus can now be used worldwide, was recognized in fiscal 2005 as an indefinite-lived intangible asset. Bayer is of the opinion that the use of the Bayer Cross by its
operating units serves to set Bayer products apart from others, particularly in the U.S.
market. There are no regulatory or statutory restrictions on its use. Bayer protects the value
of this trademark through a policy of not granting utilization rights to any party outside the
Bayer Group. Thus the intrinsic value of the Bayer Cross can be utilized indefinitely. The
residual carrying amount of the intangible asset associated with the Bayer Cross at December
31, 2005 was 107 million. The 11 million annual amortization was no longer recognized in
2005.
While self-created intangible assets generally are not capitalized, certain development costs
such as those relating to the application development stage of internally developed
software are capitalized in the Group balance sheet. These costs are amortized over the
useful life of the software from the date it is placed in service.
Goodwill, including that arising on acquisitions, is no longer amortized. In accordance with
IFRS 3 (Business Combinations) and the related revised versions of IAS 36 (Impairment of
Assets) and IAS 38 (Intangible Assets), goodwill, including that arising on acquisitions, is
no longer amortized, but in common with other indefinite-lived intangible assets tested
annually for possible impairment. This is done more frequently if events or changes in
circumstances indicate a possible impairment. Further details of the annual impairment test
for goodwill are given in Note [4.5]. Amortization of goodwill in 2004 amounted to 174
million.
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment is carried at the cost of acquisition or construction and
where subject to depletion depreciated over its estimated useful life or written down if
its value falls below its net carrying amount (impairment loss).
The cost of acquisition comprises the acquisition price, ancillary costs and subsequent
acquisition costs less any reduction received on the acquisition price. Where an obligation
exists to dismantle or remove the asset or restore a site to its former condition at the end
of the assets useful life, the estimated cost of such dismantlement, removal or restoration
is added to the assets cost of acquisition.
The cost of self-constructed property, plant and equipment comprises the direct cost of
materials, direct manufacturing expenses, appropriate allocations of material and
manufacturing overheads, and an appropriate share of the depreciation and write-downs of
assets used in construction. It includes the shares of expenses for company pension plans and
discretionary employee benefits that are attributable to construction.
If the construction phase of property, plant or equipment extends over a long period, the
interest incurred on borrowed capital up to the date of completion is capitalized as part of
the cost of acquisition or construction.
Expenses for the repair of property, plant and equipment, such as ongoing maintenance costs,
are normally charged to income. The cost of acquisition or construction is capitalized
retroactively if the expenses related to the asset will result in future economic benefits.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 97 |
Property, plant and equipment is depreciated by the straight-line method, except where
depreciation based on the actual utilization pattern is more appropriate. Depreciation for
2005 has been allocated to the cost of goods sold, selling expenses, research and development
expenses or general administration expenses. Depreciation of property, plant and equipment in
2005 totaled 1,213 million (2004: 1,208 million).
If an assets value falls below its net carrying amount, the latter is reduced accordingly. In
compliance with IAS 36 (Impairment of Assets), such impairment losses are measured by
comparing the carrying amounts to the discounted cash flows expected to be generated by the
respective assets. These asset write-downs are reversed if the reasons for them no longer
apply. Further details of the impairment test are given in Note [4.5].
When assets are sold, closed down, or scrapped, the difference between the net proceeds and
the net carrying amount of the assets is recognized as a gain or loss in other operating
income or expenses, respectively.
The following depreciation periods, based on the estimated useful lives of the respective
assets, are applied throughout the Group:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful life |
Buildings |
|
|
20 |
|
|
to |
|
|
50 |
|
|
years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outdoor infrastructure |
|
|
10 |
|
|
to |
|
|
20 |
|
|
years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant installations |
|
|
6 |
|
|
to |
|
|
20 |
|
|
years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
6 |
|
|
to |
|
|
12 |
|
|
years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laboratory and research facilities |
|
|
3 |
|
|
to |
|
|
5 |
|
|
years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage tanks and pipelines |
|
|
10 |
|
|
to |
|
|
20 |
|
|
years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicles |
|
|
5 |
|
|
to |
|
|
8 |
|
|
years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computer equipment |
|
|
3 |
|
|
to |
|
|
5 |
|
|
years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
4 |
|
|
to |
|
|
10 |
|
|
years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with IAS 17 (Leases), assets leased on terms equivalent to financing a
purchase by a long-term loan (finance leases) are capitalized at the lower of their fair value
or the present value of the minimum lease payments at the date of addition. The leased assets
are depreciated over their estimated useful lives except where subsequent transfer of title is
uncertain, in which case they are depreciated over their estimated useful lives or the
respective lease terms, whichever are shorter.
Investments in associates
Investments in material entities in which Bayer AG exerts significant influence, generally
through an ownership interest between 20 and 50 percent (associates), are accounted for by the
equity method. Further information on associates can be found in Note [21].
Financial assets
Financial assets comprise receivables, securities, equity instruments, derivative financial
instruments with positive fair values, and liquid assets. They are classified as financial assets held for trading, held-to-maturity investments, loans and financial receivables or
available-for-sale financial assets and accounted for in accordance with IAS 39 (Financial
Instruments: Recognition and Measurement).
|
|
|
98 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Receivables are classified under loans and receivables and recognized at amortized cost.
Interest-free and low-interest receivables are stated at the present value of expected future
cash flows. Securities and equity instruments are classified as available for sale and
recognized at fair value without affecting the income statement. All purchases and sales are
posted on the date of performance, i.e. the date on which the asset actually changes hands.
Embedded derivatives are accounted for separately provided that a) their economic
characteristics and risks are not closely related to those of the host contract, b) they are
not, or are not intended to be, transferred independently of the host contract, and c) the
host contract is recognized at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a
derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a
hedging relationship and, if so, the reasons for holding it. In most cases, derivative financial instruments are recognized at fair value through profit or loss. The management of
financial and commodity price risks, the accounting treatment of primary and derivative financial instruments, and the use of derivatives for hedging purposes are outlined in more
detail in Note [33]. Liquid assets are stated at nominal value.
If receivables are impaired, they are written down to the present value of expected future
cash flows. Available-for-sale securities and equity instruments are recorded at fair value.
If the fair value is expected to remain below the (amortized) cost of acquisition, the
difference is removed from stockholders equity (other comprehensive income) and recognized in
the income statement.
Where it is possible to determine a market price for an equity instrument or security, this is
regarded as its fair value. If no quoted market price exists, however, the instrument is
recognized at amortized cost. If there are objective and substantial indications of
impairment, an assessment is made of whether the carrying amount exceeds the present value of
the expected future cash flows. If this is the case, the asset is written down by the amount
of the difference.
Impairment indicators include a reduction in market value, a substantial decline in credit
standing, a specific breach of contract, a high probability of insolvency or other form of financial reorganization of the debtor, or the disappearance of an active market.
Available-for-sale debt instruments and loans and receivables are written back if the
reasons for previous years write-downs no longer apply. However, such write-backs must not
cause the carrying amount to exceed the cost of acquisition. No write-backs are made for
available-for-sale equity instruments.
Inventories
In accordance with IAS 2 (Inventories), inventories encompass assets (finished goods and
goods purchased for resale) held for sale in the ordinary course of business, in the process
of production for such sale (work in process) or in the form of materials or supplies to be
consumed in the production process or in the rendering of services (raw materials and
supplies). Inventories are usually valued by the weighted-average method and recognized at the
lower of cost or fair value less costs to sell, which is the estimated normal selling price
less the estimated production costs and selling expenses.
The cost of acquisition comprises all costs incurred to bring inventories to their present
location in their present condition. The cost of production comprises the direct cost of
materials, direct manufacturing expenses and appropriate allocations of fixed and variable
material and manufacturing overheads, where these are attributable to production.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 99 |
It also includes the shares of expenses for company pension plans and discretionary employee
benefits that are attributable to production. Administrative costs are included where they
are attributable to production. Financing costs are not included in the cost of production.
In view of the production sequences characteristic of the Bayer Group, work in process and finished goods are grouped together.
Taxes
Income taxes comprise all taxes levied on the Groups taxable income. The remaining taxes,
such as property, electricity and other energy taxes, are included in the cost of goods sold
or in selling, research and development or general administration expenses.
Deferred taxes are calculated in accordance with IAS 12 (Income Taxes). Deferred taxes arise
from temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets or liabilities in the IFRS
and tax balance sheets, from consolidation measures and from tax loss carryforwards likely to
be realizable.
Deferred tax assets relating to deductible temporary differences and tax loss carryforwards
are carried at the amount considered sufficiently likely to be recoverable in the future by
offsetting against actual taxable income.
Deferred
taxes are calculated at the rates which on the basis of the statutory regulations
in force, or already enacted in relation to future periods, as of the
closing date are
expected to apply in the individual countries at the time of realization. Deferred tax assets
and deferred tax liabilities are offset if they relate to income taxes levied by the same
taxation authority.
Provisions
Provisions are recognized for obligations arising from past events that will probably give
rise to a future outflow of resources, provided that a reliable estimate can be made of the
amount of the obligation.
The accounting and valuation principles for pension and other post-employment benefit
obligations are outlined in Note [28].
Other provisions are measured in accordance with IAS 37 (Provisions, Contingent Liabilities
and Contingent Assets) and, where appropriate, IAS 19 (Employee Benefits), using the best
estimate of the extent of the expenditure that would be required to meet the present
obligation as of the reporting date. Where the cash outflow to settle an obligation is not
expected to occur until after one year, the provision is recognized at the present value of
the expected cash outflow. Reimbursements receivable from third parties are capitalized
separately if their realization is probable.
If the projected obligation declines as a result of a change in the estimate, the provision is
reversed by the corresponding amount and the resulting income recognized in the cost of goods sold or
operating expense item(s) in which the original charge was recognized.
|
|
|
100 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Personnel commitments mainly include annual bonus payments, vacation entitlements, service
awards and other personnel costs. Reimbursements to be received from the German authorities
under the senior part-time work program are recorded as receivables and recognized in income
as soon as the criteria for such reimbursements are fulfilled. Trade-related commitments
mainly include rebates, as well as obligations relating to services already received but not
yet invoiced.
Litigation and administrative proceedings are evaluated on a case-by-case basis and the
available information, including that from Bayers legal counsel, is considered to assess
potential outcomes. Where estimates show that a future obligation will probably result in an
outflow of resources, a provision is recorded in the amount of the present value of the
expected cash outflows if these are deemed to be reasonably estimable. These provisions cover
the estimated payments to plaintiffs, court fees, attorneys fees, and the cost of potential
settlements. Further details of legal risks are given in Note [35].
Financial liabilities
Financial liabilities, including derivative financial instruments with negative fair values,
are recognized at amortized cost. Accordingly, current liabilities are carried at payment or
redemption amounts. Noncurrent liabilities and financial liabilities that are not the hedged
item in a permissible hedge accounting relationship are carried at amortized cost using the
effective interest rate method. Liabilities relating to finance leases are carried at the
present value of the future minimum lease payments.
Under IAS 32, financial instruments are only classified as equity if no contractual
obligation exists to repay the capital or deliver other financial assets to the issuer. Where
a third party holding a (minority) interest in a consolidated subsidiary is contractually
entitled to terminate its participation and at the same time claim repayment of its capital
contribution, such capital is recognized as a liability in the Group statements even if it is
classified as equity in the respective jurisdiction. The redeemable capital of a minority
stockholder is recognized at the amount of such stockholders pro-rata share of the
subsidiarys net assets.
The management of financial and commodity price risks, the accounting treatment of primary
and derivative financial instruments, and the use of derivatives for hedging purposes are
outlined in more detail in Note [33].
Miscellaneous receivables and liabilities
Accrued items, advance payments and non-financial assets and liabilities are carried at
amortized cost. They are amortized to income by the straight-line method or according to
performance of the underlying transaction.
In accordance with IAS 20 (Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government
Assistance), grants and subsidies that serve to promote investment are reflected in the
balance sheet under miscellaneous liabilities and amortized to income over the useful lives of
the respective assets.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 101 |
4.4 Cash flow statement
The cash flow statement shows how the liquidity of the Bayer Group was affected by the inflow and outflow of cash and cash equivalents during the year. The effects of acquisitions,
divestitures and other changes in the scope of consolidation are eliminated. Cash flows are
classified by operating, investing and financing activities in accordance with IAS 7 (Cash
Flow Statements). Cash and cash equivalents shown in the balance sheet comprise cash, checks,
balances with banks and securities with original maturities of up to three months. A
reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year to liquid assets as reflected in the
balance sheet supplements the cash flow statement.
The amounts reported by consolidated companies outside the euro zone are translated at average
exchange rates for the year, with the exception of cash and cash equivalents, which are
translated at closing rates as in the balance sheet. The effect of changes in exchange rates
on cash and cash equivalents is shown separately.
IFRS 5, approved by the IASB on March 31, 2004, contains the requirement that cash flows
from operating, investing and financing activities be classified by continuing and
discontinued operations. The discontinued operations shares of the cash flows from
operating, investing and financing activities are stated separately in Note [7.2].
The statement of cash flows shows the change in cash and cash equivalents from one balance
sheet date to the next. Cash and cash equivalents contain both the proceeds from the
divestiture of discontinued operations and cash inflows from these operations prior to their
disposal. Consequently, the statement of cash flows must contain all cash inflows and outflows for both continuing and discontinued operations.
In both the balance sheet and the income statement, however, the amounts corresponding to the
components of the net operating cash flow are shown for continuing operations only. This is
the case, for example, with the amounts of inventories, receivables and payables recognized in
the balance sheet that determine the changes in working capital shown in the cash flow
statement. Similarly, the operating result that is recognized in the income statement and
forms the starting-point for the cash flow statement includes continuing operations only. To
ensure that the presentation of operating activities in the cash flow statement is consistent
with the income statement and balance sheet, the net operating cash flow from continuing
operations is therefore stated first on the face of the cash flow statement. The total net
operating cash flow from discontinued operations is shown in the next line, by analogy with
the presentation of income after taxes in the income statement. The cash flows from
continuing and discontinued operations are added together to give the net operating cash flow
for the entire business.
Since the distinction between continuing operations and discontinued operations is drawn
differently starting on January 1, 2005 than in the financial statements as of December 31,
2004, the previous years amounts which were classified as discontinued have been reclassified to ensure comparability.
|
|
|
102 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
4.5 Procedure used in global impairment testing and its impact
According to IAS 36 (Impairment of Assets) and IAS 38 (Intangible Assets), goodwill and other
indefinite-lived intangible assets must be tested for impairment annually, or more
frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate a possible impairment. Amortization
of such assets is prohibited.
For the consolidated financial statements, assets are tested for impairment by comparing the
residual carrying amount of each cash-generating unit to the recoverable amount, which is the
higher of the cash-generating units fair value less costs to sell and its value in use.
In line with the definition of cash-generating units, those of the Bayer Group are identified as the strategic business entities, which are the next financial reporting levels below
the segments.
Where the carrying amount of a cash-generating unit exceeds the recoverable amount, an
impairment loss is recognized for the difference. First, the goodwill of the relevant
strategic business entity is written down accordingly. Any remaining impairment loss is
allocated among the other assets of the strategic business entity in proportion to their net
carrying amounts. This value adjustment is recognized in the income statement under other
operating expenses.
The recoverable amount is determined from the present value of future cash flows, based on
continuing use of the asset by the strategic business entity and its retirement at the end of
its useful life. The cash flow forecasts are derived from the current long-term planning for the Bayer Group.
Bayer calculates the cost of capital according to the debt/equity ratio by the weighted
average cost of capital (WACC) formula. The cost of equity corresponds to the return expected
by the stockholders and is computed from capital market information. The cost of debt used in
calculating WACC is based on the terms for a ten-year corporate bond issue.
To take into account the different risk and return profiles of the principal businesses, the
cost of capital after taxes is calculated for each of the subgroups. This is 7.4 percent for
HealthCare, 8.0 percent for CropScience and 7.0 percent for MaterialScience. The respective
interest rates are used to discount the estimated cash flows.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 103 |
The residual carrying amounts of acquired goodwill for the operating subgroups and reporting
segments are shown in the table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pharma- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environ- |
|
|
|
ceuticals, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diabetes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mental |
|
|
|
Biological |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Care, |
|
|
Animal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crop |
|
|
Science, |
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
Care |
|
|
Diagnostics |
|
|
Health |
|
|
HealthCare |
|
|
Protection |
|
|
BioScience |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amounts,
Jan. 1, 2004 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization in 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in scope
of consolidation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amounts,
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
1,145 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization in 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amounts,
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
1,165 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crop- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Material- |
|
|
Reconcilia- |
|
|
Bayer |
|
|
|
Science |
|
|
Materials |
|
|
Systems |
|
|
Science |
|
|
tion |
|
|
Group |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amounts, Jan. 1, 2004 |
|
|
1,627 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization in 2004 |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirements |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in scope
of consolidation |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amounts, Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
1,560 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization in 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirements |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amounts, Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For further information on acquisitions and divestitures see Note [7.2].
5. Critical accounting policies
The preparation of the financial statements for the Bayer Group requires the use of
estimates and assumptions. These affect the classification and valuation of assets,
liabilities, income, expenses and contingent liabilities. Estimates and assumptions mainly
relate to the useful life of noncurrent assets,
|
|
|
104 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
the discounted cash flows used in impairment testing and the establishment of provisions for
litigation, pensions and other benefits, taxes, environmental protection, inventory
valuations, sales allowances, product liability and guarantees. Estimates are based on
historical experience and other assumptions that are considered accurate in the circumstances.
The actual values may vary from the estimates. The estimates and the assumptions are
continually reviewed.
To enhance the information content of the estimates, certain important types of provisions
that could be particularly relevant to the financial position, results of operations or cash
flows of the Group are selected and tested for their sensitivity to changes in the
underlying parameters. To reflect possible uncertainty about the likelihood of the events
actually occurring, the impact of a 5 percent change in the probability of occurrence is
examined in each case. For long-term interest-bearing provisions, the impact of a 1 percent change in the interest rate used is analyzed. Analysis has not shown other
provisions to be materially sensitive. The interest sensitivity of pension obligations is
discussed in Note [28].
Critical accounting and valuation policies and methods are those that are both most important
to the portrayal of the Bayer Groups financial position, results of operations and cash flows, and that require the application of difficult, subjective and complex judgments, often
as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently
uncertain and may change in subsequent periods. The main accounting and valuation policies
used by the Bayer Group are outlined in Note [4.3]. While not all of the significant
accounting policies require difficult, subjective or complex judgments, the company considers
the following accounting policies to be significant.
Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment
At
December 31, 2005 the Bayer Group had intangible assets with a net carrying amount of 7,688 million (Note [19]) including goodwill of 2,623 million (Note [4,5]), and property,
plant and equipment with a net carrying amount of 8,321 million (Note [20]). Definite-lived
intangible assets and property, plant and equipment are amortized over their estimated useful
lives. The estimated useful lives are based on estimates of the period during which the assets
will generate revenue. Further, until the end of fiscal 2004, the Bayer Group amortized
goodwill arising from business combinations with an agreement date prior to March 31, 2004
over its scheduled useful life. This practice was discontinued effective January 1, 2005 in
compliance with IFRS 3 (Business Combinations) and the revised versions of IAS 36 (Impairment
of Assets) and IAS 38 (Intangible Assets), which prohibit the amortization of goodwill and
other indefinite-lived intangible assets.
Definite-lived assets and property, plant and equipment are tested for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may no
longer be recoverable. Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets must be tested
annually for impairment. In compliance with IAS 36 (Impairment of Assets), such impairment
losses are measured by comparing the carrying
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 105 |
amounts to the discounted cash flows expected to be generated by the respective assets. Where
it is not possible to estimate the impairment loss for an individual asset, the loss is
assessed on the basis of the discounted cash flow for the cash-generating unit to which the
asset belongs. Estimating the discounted future cash flows involves significant assumptions,
especially regarding future sales prices, sales volumes and costs. The discounting process is
also based on assumptions and estimations relating to business-specific costs of capital,
which in turn are based on country risks, credit risks and additional risks resulting from the
volatility of the respective line of business as well as the capital structure of the relevant
subgroup. Further information on the procedure for impairment testing and the residual
carrying amounts of goodwill at the balance sheet date is given in Note [4,5].
If the present value of future cash flows used to calculate the strategic business
entities value in use in light of their continuing utilization and their retirement at the
end of their useful lives were 10 percent lower than the anticipated present value, the net
carrying amount of goodwill in the Crop Protection segment of the Bayer CropScience subgroup
would have to be reduced by 48 million. In the Systems segment of the Bayer MaterialScience
subgroup, the net carrying amount of goodwill would have to be reduced by 5 million and that
of other intangible assets by 19 million. If the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) used
for the impairment test had to be increased by 10 percent, this would not affect the net
carrying amounts of the strategic business entities assets.
Estimates are also used in the course of acquisitions to determine the fair value of the
assets and liabilities acquired. Land, buildings and equipment are usually appraised
independently, while marketable securities are valued at market price. If any intangible
assets are identified, depending on the type of asset and the complexity of determining its
fair value, Bayer either consults with an independent external valuation expert or develops
the fair value internally, using an appropriate valuation technique which is generally derived
from a forecast of the total expected future net cash flows. Assets may be valued using
methods based on cost, market price or net present value, depending on the type of asset and
the availability of information. The method based on net present value (income approach) is
particularly important in relation to intangible assets. Trademarks and licenses, for example,
are valued by the relief-from-royalty method, which includes estimating the cost savings that
result from the companys ownership of trademarks and licenses on which it does not have to
pay royalties to a licensor. The intangible asset is then recognized at the present value of
these savings.
Although the Board of Management of Bayer AG believes that its estimates of the relevant
expected useful lives, its assumptions concerning the macroeconomic environment and
developments in the industries in which the Bayer Group operates and its estimations of the
discounted future cash flows are appropriate, changes in assumptions or circumstances could
require changes in the analysis. This could lead to additional impairment charges in the
future or to valuation write-backs should the trends expected by the Board of Management of
Bayer AG reverse.
|
|
|
106 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Research and development
In addition to in-house research and development activities, various research and development
collaborations and alliances are maintained with third parties that involve the provision of
funding and/or payments for the achievement of performance milestones. All research costs are
expensed as incurred. Since development projects are subject to regulatory approval procedures
and other uncertainties, the conditions for the capitalization of costs incurred before
approvals are received are not satisfied, and these costs, too, are therefore expensed as
incurred. With respect to costs incurred in collaborations and alliances with third parties,
considerable judgment is
involved in assessing whether milestone-based payments simply reflect the funding of
research, in which case expensing is always required, or whether, by making a milestone
payment, an asset is acquired. In the latter case, the relevant costs are capitalized.
Net sales
The nature of the Bayer Groups business activities means that many sales transactions are
complex in structure. Sales are recognized upon transfer of risk or rendering of services to
third parties. Revenues from contracts that contain customer acceptance provisions are
deferred until customer acceptance occurs. It is customary to grant price discounts in the
normal course of business. Allocations to provisions for discounts and rebates to customers
are recognized in the same period in which the related sales are recorded based on the
contract terms, using a consistent method. The cost of such sales incentives is estimated on
the basis of historical experience with similar incentive programs. For rebates, provisions
are recorded based upon the experience ratio to the respective periods sales to determine the
rebate accrual and related expense. Provisions related to the Groups trade accounts amounted
to 648 million on December 31, 2005. Some of the Bayer Groups revenues are generated from
licensing agreements under which third parties are granted rights to certain of our products
and technologies. Upfront payments and similar non-refundable payments received under these
agreements are recorded as miscellaneous liabilities and recognized in income over the
estimated performance period stipulated in the agreement. Non-refundable milestone payments
linked to the achievement of a significant and substantive technical/regulatory hurdle in the
research and development process, pursuant to collaborative agreements, are recognized as
revenue upon the achievement of the specified milestone. Revenues are also derived from
research and development collaborations and co-promotion agreements. Such agreements may
consist of multiple elements and provide for varying consideration terms, such as upfront,
milestone and similar payments, which may be complex and require significant analysis by
management in order to separate individual revenue components and recognize them on the most
appropriate dates. This may have to be done partly on the basis of assumptions.
Pensions and other post-employment benefits
Group companies provide retirement benefits for most of their employees, either directly or
by contributing to independently administered funds. The way these benefits are provided
varies according to the legal, fiscal and economic conditions of each country, the benefits
generally being based on the employees remuneration and years of service. The obligations
relate both to existing retirees pensions
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 107 |
and to pension entitlements of future retirees. Group companies provide retirement benefits
under defined contribution and/or defined benefit plans. In the case of defined
contribution plans, the company pays contributions to publicly or privately administered
pension insurance plans on a mandatory, contractual or voluntary basis. Once the contributions
have been paid, the company has no further payment obligations. All other retirement benefit
systems are defined benefit plans, which may be either unfunded, i.e. financed by provisions
(accruals), or funded, i.e. financed through pension funds.
Statistical and actuarial methods are used to anticipate future events in calculating the
expenses and liabilities related to the plans. These calculations include assumptions about
the discount rate, expected return on plan assets and rate of future compensation increases.
The interest rate used to discount post-employment benefit obligations to present value is
derived from the yields of senior, high-quality corporate bonds in the respective country at
the balance sheet date. These generally include AA-rated securities. The discount rate is
based on the yield of a portfolio of bonds whose weighted residual maturities approximately
correspond to the duration necessary to cover the entire benefit obligation. If AA-rated
corporate bonds of equal duration are not available, a discount rate equivalent to the
effective interest rate for government bonds at the balance sheet date is used instead,
increased by about 0.5 to 1.0 percentage point since corporate bonds generally give higher
yields by virtue of their risk structure. Determination of the discount rate is also based on
the average yield for a bond portfolio corresponding to the expected cash outflows from the
pension plans.
The assumption for the expected return-on-assets reflects a long-term outlook for global
capital market returns that match the duration of the pension obligation, and a diversified
investment strategy. The investment policy of Bayer Pensionskasse is geared to regulatory
compliance and to the risk structure associated with the benefit obligations. On this basis,
Bayer Pensionskasse has developed a strategic target portfolio commensurate with the risk
profile. This investment strategy focuses principally on stringent management of downside
risks rather than on maximizing absolute returns. In other countries, too, the key criteria
for the funds investment strategies are the structure of the benefit obligations and the
risk profile. Other determinants are risk diversification, portfolio efficiency and a
country-specific and global risk/return profile capable of ensuring the payment of all
future benefits. The expected return is applied to the fair market value of plan assets at
each year end.
Statistical information such as withdrawal and mortality rates is also used in estimating the
expenses and liabilities under the plans. Because of changing market and economic conditions,
the expenses and liabilities actually arising under the plans in the future may differ
materially from the estimates made on the basis of these actuarial assumptions. The plan
assets are partially comprised of equity and fixed-income instruments. Therefore, declining
returns on equity markets and markets for fixed-income instruments could necessitate
additional contributions to the plans in order to cover future pension obligations. Also,
higher or lower withdrawal rates or longer or shorter life of participants may have an impact
on the amount of pension income or expense recorded in the future. On December 31, 2005, the
present value of provisions for pensions and other post-employment benefits payable under
defined benefit plans was 15,561 million. Further details of pension provisions and their
interest rate sensitivity are given in Note [28].
|
|
|
108 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Doubtful accounts
Doubtful accounts are reported at the amounts likely to be recoverable based on historical
experience of customer default. As soon as it is learned that a particular account is subject
to a risk over and above the normal credit risk (e.g., low creditworthiness of customer,
dispute as to the existence or the amount of the claim, nonenforceability of the claim for
legal reasons, etc.), the account is analyzed and written down if circumstances indicate the
receivable is uncollectible. Accumulated write-downs of receivables amounted to 348 million
as of December 31, 2005.
Environmental provisions
The business of the Bayer Group is subject to a variety of laws and regulations in the
jurisdictions in which it operates or maintains properties. Provisions for expenses that may
be incurred in complying with such laws and regulations are set aside if environmental
inquiries or remediation measures are probable, the costs can be reliably estimated and no
future benefits are expected from such measures.
It is difficult to estimate the future costs of environmental protection and remediation
because of many uncertainties, particularly with regard to the status of laws, regulations and
the information available about conditions in the various countries and at the individual
sites. Significant factors in estimating the costs include previous experiences in similar
cases, expert opinions regarding environmental programs, current costs and new developments
affecting costs, managements interpretation of current environmental laws and regulations,
the number and financial position of third parties that may become obligated to participate
in any remediation costs on the basis of joint liability, and the remediation methods which
are likely to be deployed. Changes in these assumptions could impact future reported results.
Subject to these factors, but taking into consideration experience gained to date regarding
environmental matters of a similar nature, Bayer believes the provisions to be adequate based
upon currently available information. However, given the inherent difficulties in estimating
liabilities in this area, it cannot be guaranteed that additional costs will not be incurred
beyond the amounts accrued. It is possible that final resolution of these matters may require
expenditures to be made in excess of established provisions, over an extended period of time
and in a range of amounts that cannot be reasonably estimated. Management nevertheless
believes that such additional amounts, if any, would not have a material adverse effect on the
Groups financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Group provisions for
environmental protection measures amounted to 279 million on December 31, 2005. Further
information on environmental provisions can be found in Note [29.2].
Litigation provisions
As a global company with a diverse business portfolio, the Bayer Group is exposed to numerous
legal risks, particularly in the areas of product liability, patent disputes, tax assessments,
competition and antitrust law, and environmental matters. The outcome of the currently pending
and future proceedings cannot be
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 109 |
predicted with certainty. Thus, an adverse decision in a lawsuit could result in additional
costs that are not covered, either wholly or partially, under insurance policies and that
could significantly impact the business and results of operations of the Bayer Group. If the
Bayer Group loses a case in which it seeks to enforce its patent rights, a decrease in future
earnings could result as other manufacturers could be permitted to begin to market products
that the Bayer Group or its predecessors had developed.
Litigation and other judicial proceedings as a rule raise difficult and complex legal issues
and are subject to many uncertainties and complexities including, but not limited to, the
facts and circumstances of each particular case, issues regarding the jurisdiction in which
each suit is brought and differences in applicable law. Upon resolution of any pending legal
matter, the Bayer Group may be forced to incur charges in excess of the presently established
provisions and related insurance coverage. It is possible that the financial position,
results of operations or cash flows of the Bayer Group could be materially affected by the
unfavorable outcome of litigation. Litigation and administrative proceedings are evaluated on
a case-by-case basis considering the available information, including that from legal counsel,
to assess potential outcomes. Where it is considered probable that a future obligation will
result in an outflow of resources, a provision is recorded in the amount of the present value
of the expected cash outflows if these are deemed to be reliably measurable. These provisions
cover the estimated payments to plaintiffs, court fees and the cost of potential settlements.
Provisions for litigation-related expenses totaled 663 million on December 31, 2005. Further
details of legal risks are given in Note [35].
Income taxes
To compute provisions for taxes, estimates have to be made. Estimates are also necessary to
determine whether valuation allowances are required against deferred tax assets. These involve
assessing the probabilities that deferred tax assets resulting from deductible temporary
differences and tax losses can be utilized to offset taxable income. Uncertainties exist with
respect to the interpretation of complex tax regulations and the amount and timing of future
taxable income. Given the wide range of international business relationships and the long-term
nature and complexity of existing contractual agreements, differences arising between the
actual results and the assumptions made, or future changes to such assumptions, could
necessitate adjustments to tax income and expense in future periods. The Group establishes
reasonable provisions for possible consequences of audits by the tax authorities of the
respective countries. The amount of such provisions is based on various factors, such as
experience of previous tax audits and differing interpretations of tax regulations by the
taxable entity and the responsible tax authority. Such differences of interpretation may arise
on a wide variety of issues depending on the conditions prevailing in the respective Group
companys domicile. On December 31, 2005, net liabilities for current tax payments amounted to
381 million, and net deferred tax assets to 1,418 million. Further information on income
taxes is given in Note [16].
|
|
|
110 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
6. Segment reporting
In accordance with IAS 14 (Segment Reporting), a breakdown of certain data in the financial statements is given by segments and geographical region. The segments and regions are
the same as those used for internal reporting, allowing a reliable assessment of risks and
returns. The aim is to provide users of the financial statements with information regarding
the profitability and future prospects of the Groups various activities.
As of December 31, 2005 the Bayer Group comprised three subgroups with operations subdivided
into divisions (HealthCare), business groups or strategic business entities (CropScience and
MaterialScience). Their activities are aggregated into the eight reporting segments listed
below according to economic characteristics, products, production processes, customer
relationships and methods of distribution.
The subgroups activities are as follows:
|
|
|
Subgroup / Segment |
|
Activities |
|
HealthCare
|
|
|
Pharmaceuticals, |
|
|
Biological Products
|
|
Development and marketing of prescription pharmaceuticals |
Consumer Care
|
|
Development and marketing of over-the-counter medications and nutritional supplements |
Diabetes Care, Diagnostics
|
|
Development and marketing of diagnostic products for laboratory testing, near-patient testing and self-testing applications |
Animal Health
|
|
Development and marketing of veterinary medicines, nutritionals and grooming products
for companion animals and livestock |
|
CropScience
|
|
|
Crop Protection
|
|
Development and marketing of a comprehensive portfolio of fungicides, herbicides, insecticides and seed treatment products to meet a wide range of regional requirements |
Environmental Science,
|
|
Development and marketing of a wide range of products for the green industry, garden care, |
BioScience
|
|
non-agricultural pest and weed control and conventional seeds, and plant biotechnology |
|
MaterialScience
|
|
|
Materials
|
|
Production and marketing of high-quality plastics granules, methylcellulose, metallic and
ceramic powders and semi-finished products |
Systems
|
|
Development, manufacturing and marketing of polyurethanes for a wide variety of applications as well as coating and adhesive raw materials; production and marketing of basic
inorganic chemicals |
|
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 111 |
The spin-off of LANXESS and the acquisition of the Roche OTC business have led to a shift in
the relative sizes of the Groups businesses in terms of sales, EBIT and assets. In compliance
with IAS 14 (Segment Reporting), the segmentation has therefore been adjusted effective
January 1, 2005 to reflect the new Group structure.
Moreover, IFRS 5, which was approved by the IASB on March 31, 2004, introduces specific
recognition principles for assets and liabilities held for sale and for discontinued
operations and requires that reporting now be based primarily on continuing operations. In
contrast to the table in the financial statements as of December 31, 2004, the segment table
for 2005 therefore reflects continuing operations only. The prior-year figures have been
reclassified to ensure comparability.
Effective January 1, 2006 the Pharmaceuticals, Biological Products segment was renamed the
Pharmaceuticals segment. The former Biological Products and Pharmaceuticals divisions were
combined to form a new Pharmaceuticals Division.
The reconciliation eliminates intersegment items and reflects income and expenses not
allocable to segments. These include in particular the Corporate Center, the service companies
and sideline operations.
The segment data are calculated as follows:
|
|
The intersegment sales reflect intragroup transactions effected at transfer prices fixed on an arms length basis. |
|
|
|
The return on sales is the ratio of the operating result (EBIT) to external net sales. |
|
|
|
The gross cash flow comprises the operating result (EBIT) plus depreciation,
amortization and writedowns, minus income taxes, minus gains/plus losses on retirements
of noncurrent assets, plus/minus changes in pension provisions. The latter item includes
the elimination of non-cash components of the operating result. It also contains benefit
payments during the year. |
|
|
|
The net cash flow is the cash flow from operating activities as defined in IAS 7. |
|
|
|
The capital invested comprises all assets serving the respective segment that are
required to yield a return on their cost of acquisition. Noncurrent assets are included
at cost of acquisition or construction throughout their useful lives because the
calculation of cash flow return on investment (CFROI) requires that depreciation and
amortization be excluded. Interest-free liabilities are deducted. The capital invested is
stated as of December 31. |
|
|
|
The CFROI is the ratio of the gross cash flow to the average capital invested for the
year and is thus a measure of the return on capital employed. |
|
|
|
The equity items are those reflected in the balance sheet and income statement. They
are allocated to the segments where possible. |
|
|
|
Capital expenditures, amortization and depreciation relate to intangible assets,
property, plant and equipment. |
|
|
|
112 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
|
|
Since financial management of Group companies is carried out centrally by Bayer AG, financial liabilities are not allocated directly to the respective segments. Consequently,
the liabilities shown for the individual segments do not include financial liabilities. |
7. Changes in the Bayer Group
7.1 Scope of consolidation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany |
|
|
Other countries |
|
|
Total |
|
Bayer AG and consolidated companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2005 |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirements |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companies included at equity (associates) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2005 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2005 |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirements |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other affiliated companies (Bayers interest > 5%) |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirements |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The financial statements of the Bayer Group as of December 31, 2005 include Bayer AG and
52 German and 225 foreign consolidated subsidiaries in which Bayer AG, directly or indirectly,
has a majority of the voting rights or from which it is able to derive benefit by virtue of
its power to govern corporate financial and operating policies. The total number of
consolidated subsidiaries decreased by 66 compared with the previous year. Ten companies are
consolidated for the first time, while 76 companies included in the previous year have been
deconsolidated. The latter number is accounted for mainly by the spin-off of the LANXESS
subgroup (60 companies) and mergers between Bayer companies. Five
joint ventures the same
number as in the previous year are included by proportionate consolidation in compliance
with IAS 31 (Financial Reporting of Interests in Joint Ventures). Excluded from consolidation
are 108 subsidiaries that in aggregate are immaterial to the net worth, financial position
and earnings of the Bayer Group; they account for less than 0.2 percent of Group sales, less
than 0.7 percent of stockholders equity and less than 0.4 percent of total assets.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 113 |
The effect of joint ventures on the Group balance sheet and income statement is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent assets |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net assets |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income after taxes |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
While 11 companies are accounted for by the equity method, 39 companies that in aggregate
are of minor importance are stated at amortized cost.
Lists of Bayer AGs direct and indirect holdings have been included in the Cologne commercial
register. They also are available directly from Bayer AG on request.
The principal companies consolidated in the financial statements are listed in the following
table:
|
|
|
|
|
Company Name and Place of Business |
|
Bayers interest |
|
% |
|
|
|
Germany |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Business Services GmbH, Leverkusen |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer CropScience AG, Monheim |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer CropScience Deutschland GmbH,
Langenfeld |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer HealthCare AG, Leverkusen |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Industry Services GmbH & Co. OHG,
Leverkusen |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer MaterialScience AG, Leverkusen |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Technology Services GmbH,
Leverkusen |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Vital GmbH, Leverkusen |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
H.C. Starck GmbH, Goslar |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Wolff Cellulosics GmbH & Co. KG, Walsrode |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other European Countries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Antwerpen Comm.V, Belgium |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Consumer Care AG, Switzerland |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer CropScience France S.A.S., France |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer CropScience Limited, U.K. |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer CropScience S.r.l., Italy |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Diagnostics Europe Ltd., Ireland |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer International S.A., Switzerland |
|
|
99.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Pharma S.A.S., France |
|
|
99.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Polyols S.N.C., France |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Public Limited Company,
U.K. |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer S.p.A., Italy |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Santé Familiale S.A.S., France |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer SP.Z.O.O., Poland |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Quimica Farmaceutica Bayer, S.A., Spain |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company Name and Place of Business |
|
Bayers interest |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer CropScience Inc., Canada |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer CropScience LP, United States |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer HealthCare LLC, United States |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Inc., Canada |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer MaterialScience LLC, United States |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation,
United States |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
H.C. Starck Inc., United States |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Asia/Pacific |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Australia Limited, Australia |
|
|
99.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer CropScience K.K., Japan |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Korea Ltd., Republic of Korea |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer MaterialScience Limited, Hong Kong |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Medical Ltd., Japan |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer South East Asia Pte Ltd., Singapore |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd., Japan |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
H.C. Starck Ltd., Japan |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sumika Bayer Urethane Co., Ltd., Japan |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
Latin America/Africa/Middle East |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer (Proprietary) Limited, South Africa |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer CropScience Ltda., Brazil |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., Mexico |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer S.A., Argentina |
|
|
99.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer S.A., Brazil |
|
|
99.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Türk Kimya Sanayi Limited Sirketi,
Turkey |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Also included in the consolidated financial
statements are the following material
associates, which are accounted for by the
equity method:
|
|
|
|
|
Company Name and Place of Business |
|
Bayers interest |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
GE Bayer Silicones GmbH & Co. KG,
Germany |
|
|
49.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lyondell Bayer Manufacturing Maasvlakte
VOF, Netherlands |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Palthough Industries (1998) Ltd., Israel |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
PO JV, LP, United States |
|
|
42.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Polygal Plastics Industries Ltd., Israel |
|
|
25.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following domestic subsidiaries availed themselves in 2005 of certain exemptions
granted under Articles 264, paragraph 3 and 264 b, No. 4 of the German Commercial Code
regarding the preparation, auditing and publication of financial statements:
|
|
|
Company Name |
|
Place of Business |
Bayer 04 Immobilien GmbH
|
|
Leverkusen |
|
|
|
|
Bayer 04 Leverkusen Fußball GmbH
|
|
Leverkusen |
|
|
|
|
Bayer 04 Mobilien GmbH
|
|
Leverkusen |
|
|
|
|
Bayer Beteiligungsverwaltungsgesellschaft mbH
|
|
Leverkusen |
|
|
|
|
Bayer Bitterfeld GmbH
|
|
Greppin |
|
|
|
|
Bayer Business Services GmbH
|
|
Leverkusen |
|
|
|
|
Bayer Chemicals AG
|
|
Leverkusen |
|
|
|
|
Bayer CropScience AG
|
|
Monheim |
|
|
|
|
Bayer Gastronomie GmbH
|
|
Leverkusen |
|
|
|
|
Bayer Gesellschaft für Beteiligungen mbH
|
|
Greppin |
|
|
|
|
Bayer HealthCare AG
|
|
Leverkusen |
|
|
|
|
Bayer Industry Services GmbH & Co. OHG
|
|
Leverkusen |
|
|
|
|
Bayer Innovation GmbH
|
|
Leverkusen |
|
|
|
|
Bayer MaterialScience AG
|
|
Leverkusen |
|
|
|
|
Bayer MaterialScience Customer Services GmbH
|
|
Leverkusen |
|
|
|
|
Bayer Technology Services GmbH
|
|
Leverkusen |
|
|
|
|
Bayer Vital GmbH
|
|
Leverkusen |
|
|
|
|
Bayer-Handelsgesellschaft mbH
|
|
Leverkusen |
|
|
|
|
Bayer-Kaufhaus GmbH
|
|
Leverkusen |
|
|
|
|
Case Tech GmbH & Co. KG
|
|
Bomlitz |
|
|
|
|
Chemion Logistik GmbH
|
|
Leverkusen |
|
|
|
|
Drugofa GmbH
|
|
Cologne |
|
|
|
|
DYNEVO GmbH
|
|
Leverkusen |
|
|
|
|
EPUREX Films GmbH & Co. KG
|
|
Bomlitz |
|
|
|
|
Erste K-W-A Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH
|
|
Leverkusen |
|
|
|
|
Euroservices Bayer GmbH
|
|
Leverkusen |
|
|
|
|
Generics Holding GmbH
|
|
Leverkusen |
|
|
|
|
Gesellschaft für Wohnen und Gebäudemanagement mbH
|
|
Leverkusen |
|
|
|
|
GP Grenzach Produktions GmbH
|
|
Grenzach |
|
|
|
|
KVP Pharma+Veterinär-Produkte GmbH
|
|
Kiel |
|
|
|
|
Probis GmbH
|
|
Bomlitz |
|
|
|
|
Sportrechte Vermarktungs- und Verwertungs-GmbH & Co. oHG
|
|
Leverkusen |
|
|
|
|
Travel Board GmbH
|
|
Leverkusen |
|
|
|
|
Wolff Cellulosics GmbH & Co. KG
|
|
Bomlitz |
|
|
|
|
Wolff Walsrode AG
|
|
Walsrode |
|
|
|
|
Zweite K-W-A Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH
|
|
Leverkusen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 115 |
7.2 Business combinations and other acquisitions; divestments; discontinued operations
Business combinations are accounted for by the purchase method. Accordingly, the results of
operations of the acquired businesses are included in the consolidated financial statements
as from the respective dates of acquisition. The purchase prices of acquisitions of companies
domiciled outside the euro zone are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the
respective dates of acquisition.
In 2005 a total of 2,406 million was spent for acquisitions constituting business
combinations within the scope of IFRS 3 and for other acquisitions. The respective amounts are
translated at the exchange rates in effect on the respective acquisition dates. The purchase
prices of these acquisitions were settled by cash payments and by the assumption of 46
million in liabilities. Goodwill arising on these acquisitions totaled 661 million and is
subject to an annual impairment test.
Since January 2005, the worldwide Roche consumer health business with non-prescription drugs
and vitamins has been part of the Consumer Care Division of Bayer HealthCare. The transaction
includes the global consumer health activities of Roche, with the exception of Japan,
including the five production sites in Grenzach, Germany; Gaillard, France; Pilar, Argentina;
Casablanca, Morocco; and Jakarta, Indonesia. Among the brands acquired are Aleve®,
Bepanthen®, Redoxon®, Rennie® and Supradyn®. The
merger puts Bayer among the largest global suppliers of prescription-free medicines.
The acquired business contributed 1,061 million to Group sales in 2005. Since the sales
forces, distribution function and support functions such as
controlling have been
combined in the Groups legal entities, it is not practicable to separately identify an
operating result of the former Roche business.
The acquisition price for the worldwide consumer health business of Roche, before including
the assumption of net financial liabilities, was approximately 2,338 million, including
about 208 million for the purchase of the remaining 50 percent interest in the U.S. joint
venture with Roche. This purchase was completed in 2004 in an economically and legally
separate transaction. The acquisition of the remaining global business was accomplished in
2005 by way of a 2,130 million cash transfer, of which 200 million was paid in advance at
the end of 2004, and the assumption of some 46 million in net financial liabilities. The
ancillary costs of the acquisition amounted to about 28 million.
The assets and goodwill acquired were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition costs excluding
assumption of debt |
|
|
2,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ancillary acquisition costs |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price |
|
|
2,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of acquired net assets |
|
|
1,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill is attributable to a number of
factors, including significant synergies
that the Bayer Group expects to achieve by
acquiring the Roche OTC business. Apart from
general administrative processes and
infrastructure synergies, these comprise
significant savings in sales and marketing
costs, for example. The acquisition also
strengthens the Bayer Groups global market
position in the OTC
sector. Of the 644 million in recognized goodwill, 183 million is tax-deductible.
|
|
|
116 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
The purchase price can be allocated among the acquired assets and assumed liabilities at the
date of acquisition as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying |
|
|
|
amount prior to |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
amount after |
|
|
|
the acquisition |
|
|
adjustments |
|
|
the acquisition |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired assets and assumed liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,142 |
|
|
|
1,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets (excluding liquid assets) |
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquid assets |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous liabilities |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pensions and other post-employment benefits |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other provisions |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which ancillary acquisition costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed net financial liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash outflow for the acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The expected useful lives of the acquired other intangible assets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
Useful life |
|
|
|
million |
|
|
Years |
|
Trademarks |
|
|
1,055 |
|
|
|
20 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing- and
customer-related rights |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
20 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software and
technologies |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
5 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to the acquisition of the
Roche consumer health business, the following
significant acquisitions or other
transactions were made in 2005:
In connection with the acquisition of Aventis
CropScience Holding, S.A., France, in 2002,
the antitrust authorities required Bayer to
divest some of the operations acquired from
Aventis. In this connection, the business with the active ingredient fipronil was sold to BASF AG, Ludwigshafen,
Germany, in 2003. On January 31, 2005, Bayer CropScience AG, Monheim, Germany, signed an
agreement with BASF to license back the rights to this product for agricultural applications
in certain countries outside of Europe and the United States, for 125 million.
On February 10, 2005, Bayer CropScience GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, and Bayer
CropScience LP, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States, acquired various
intangible assets and the property, plant and equipment required for the production of cotton
seeds from Associated Farmers Delinting, Inc., a regional cotton seed producer based in
Littlefield, Texas, for 9 million.
On July 8, 2005, Bayer South East Asia Pte Ltd., Singapore, received marketing rights for the
cardiovascular drug Zetia® to the value of 100 million under a co-marketing and
distribution agreement with Schering-Plough.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 117 |
Bayer MaterialScience LLC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, acquired Polythane Systems, Inc. (PSI),
Spring, Texas, on August 31, 2005, for 20 million. PSI is a leading American supplier of
polyurethane spray foam systems for roof insulation.
The total net assets and goodwill acquired in
the above acquisitions and transactions and a
number of smaller ones is comprised as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
Acquisition costs |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ancillary acquisition costs |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of acquired net assets |
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
These acquisitions and other transactions
affected the Groups assets and liabilities
as of the dates of acquisition as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
Acquired assets and assumed liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial assets |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
|
|
of which ancillary acquisition costs |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed net financial liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash outflow for the business combinations and other acquisitions |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
|
|
IFRS 3 requires that information be
provided not only on business combinations in
the year under report but also on those
taking place between the closing date and the
date of approval of the financial
statements for publication. It is therefore
reported here that on January 9, 2006, Bayer
Innovation GmbH acquired the biotech company
Icon Genetics AG, Munich, Germany. Icon
Genetics discovers innovative methods for the
development and use of engineered plants to
produce therapeutically active substances.
The purchase price upon conclusion of the
sale-and-purchase agreement was
18 million. Since this acquisition was made
only recently, allocation of the purchase
price among the acquired assets and
liabilities has not yet been
completed. It is expected to be allocated primarily to research and development work in process.
The Bayer Group made the following significant divestitures, the proceeds of which totaled
87 million, in 2005.
The Bayer CropScience subgroup divested a number of activities in 2005 to strengthen the focus
on its core business. These included Philagro Holding S.S., France, and EqSeeds Comercia de
Sementes Ltda., Brazil. Bayer CropScience also divested the businesses with various active
ingredients together with the related rights, including the acaricide and insecticide Amitraz,
which it marketed as Mitac®. CropScience also sold its site in Hauxton, United
Kingdom, in December 2005, and BCS S.A., France, divested its interest in Holdisa S.r.l.,
Italy. The selling prices of the operations divested by Bayer CropScience in fiscal 2005
totaled 80 million.
The remaining 7 million relates to several minor divestitures in the Bayer Group.
|
|
|
118 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
The divestitures affected the Groups assets and liabilities as of the respective dates of
divestiture as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
Divested assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial assets |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pensions and other post-employment benefits |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other provisions |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net gain on divestitures |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total selling price |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net divested financial liabilities |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash inflow from the divestitures |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
operations
IFRS 5, which was
approved by the IASB on March 31, 2004,
introduces specific recognition principles
for assets and liabilities held for sale and
for discontinued operations and requires that
financial reporting be based primarily on
continuing operations. To improve
transparency and comparability, the Groups
financial reporting is based primarily on
continuing operations, while assets held for
sale and discontinued operations are stated
separately in a single line item in the
balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement. Both the LANXESS business and
the divested plasma business in the United
States are reported as discontinued
operations.
In November 2003 the Board of Management and Supervisory Board of Bayer AG decided to separate
from the Bayer Group major parts of the chemicals activities and about one third of the
polymers activities. These activities were subsequently placed in the LANXESS subgroup. The
separation took place by way of a spin-off pursuant to the German Transformation Act
(Umwandlungsgesetz). For this purpose, a Spin-Off and Acquisition Agreement was concluded
between Bayer AG and LANXESS AG in September 2004. This was approved at an Extraordinary
Stockholders Meeting of Bayer AG held in Essen, Germany, on November 17, 2004.
The Joint Spin-Off Report of the boards of management of Bayer AG and LANXESS AG contains a
detailed description of the spin-off, together with an explanation of the background.
On January 28, 2005 the spin-off of LANXESS was entered in the commercial register for Bayer
AG. The shares of LANXESS AG were legally assigned upon their issuance on that date to Bayer
AG stockholders. Since January 31, 2005 shares in LANXESS have been listed in the Prime
Standard subsegment of the official market segment (Amtlicher Markt) of the Frankfurt Stock
Exchange. The LANXESS subgroup was therefore deconsolidated from the Bayer Group effective
January 31, 2005.
In addition, plans were announced in October 2003 to divest the plasma activities of the
Biological Products Division of the HealthCare subgroup. These activities, too, are reported
as discontinued operations. This decision does not affect the Kogenate® operations.
In December 2004 a contract was signed to sell the plasma business in the United States to
Talecris BioTherapeutics, Inc., a new company controlled by the U.S. equity investors Cerberus
Capital Management L.P., New York, and Ampersand Ventures, Wellesley, Massachusetts. This
transaction was closed on March 31, 2005.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 119 |
The amounts shown in the consolidated financial statements of the Bayer Group under
discontinued operations relate, respectively, to the plasma operations in the United States
and to all assets, liabilities, income and
expenses pertaining to the activities transferred to LANXESS. The LANXESS data are presented
from the standpoint of the Bayer Group and are not intended to portray either the LANXESS
activities or the remaining activities of Bayer as those of stand-alone entities. The
presentation thus follows the principles set out in IFRS 5 for reporting discontinued
operations.
A breakdown of the results of discontinued operations is given below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LANXESS |
|
|
Plasma business |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
6,053 |
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
6,480 |
|
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
(4,635 |
) |
|
|
(345 |
) |
|
|
(309 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
(4,944 |
) |
|
|
(436 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling expenses |
|
|
(846 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(902 |
) |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General administration expenses |
|
|
(263 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(281 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income (expenses) net |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating result (EBIT) from discontinued operations |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating result |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) after taxes |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income (loss) from discontinued operations
(before taxes) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income (loss) from discontinued operations
(after taxes) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from the sale of discontinued operations
(before taxes) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from the sale of discontinued operations
(after taxes) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income (loss) from discontinued operations
after taxes |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For fiscal 2005, the results of the LANXESS activities that were spun off relate solely
to the month of January because LANXESS was deconsolidated as of January 31, 2005.
|
|
|
120 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
The separate asset and liability line items in the balance sheet reflect the following
amounts pertaining to the discontinued LANXESS and plasma operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LANXESS |
|
|
Plasma business |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent assets |
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
1,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
2,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
1,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable |
|
|
1,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held for sale and discontinued operations |
|
|
4,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions for pensions and other post-employment benefits |
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other provisions |
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other provisions |
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities |
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous current liabilities |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities directly related to assets held for sale and discontinued operations |
|
|
2,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations affected the Group cash flow statements as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total discontinued |
|
|
|
LANXESS |
|
|
Plasma business |
|
|
operations |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
(246 |
) |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 121 |
8. Net sales
Sales revenues are derived primarily from product deliveries. Total reported net sales
increased by 4,105 million or 17.6 percent from 2004, to 27,383 million. Contributing to this expansion were a
109 million, or 0.5 percent, increase in volumes along with a 279 million, or 1.2 percent,
positive impact of shifts in exchange rates. Changes in selling prices contributed 1,647 million,
or 7.0 percent, to the growth in business. Portfolio changes boosted sales by 2,070 million.
Acquisitions and divestitures during 2005 and 2004 affected the comparison between
the two years sales figures by the following amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roche consumer health business |
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gustafson (50 percent acquired in 2004) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
Divestitures |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net sales to LANXESS after the spin-off
on January 31, 20051 |
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net effect of portfolio changes |
|
|
2,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
A trading relationship now
exists between the Bayer Group and the
LANXESS Group as separate enterprises
following the spin-off of what was previously
the LANXESS subgroup of Bayer. The relevant
agreements are concluded on an arms-length
basis. Under these agreements, the Bayer
Group supplies goods and services to the
LANXESS Group. Some of the transactions
relate to products, such as chlorine or
caustic soda solution, that are supplied to
LANXESS by the MaterialScience subgroup.
Others are service transactions in the areas
of IT systems development and application
support, IT infrastructure, site services and
engineering services. Prior to the spin-off,
the resulting
revenues were recorded as intragroup sales and eliminated in the consolidation. |
Breakdowns of net sales by segment and by region are given in the table on page 84f.
9. Selling expenses
Selling expenses include 621 million in shipping and handling costs in 2005 (2004: 569
million). They also include advertising and promotion costs, expensed in the period in which
they are incurred. These costs amount to 1,222 million (2004: 963 million).
10. Research and development expenses
Because of their importance in the Bayer Group, research and development expenses are
recognized separately alongside the cost of goods sold, selling expenses and general
administration expenses.
|
|
|
122 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
11. Other operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains from sales of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reversals of unutilized provisions |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-backs of receivables and other assets |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognition of exchange rate hedges |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous operating income |
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In July 2005, it was decided to modify several of Bayers largest pension plans in the
United States, replacing the current defined-benefit plans with purely defined-contribution
plans. The resulting reduction in pension obligations yielded one-time income of 294 million
in fiscal 2005, which is included in other operating income. In the previous year, income of
116 million was realized from a restructuring of global pension obligations. Further
information on the accounting for pension provisions is given in Note [28].
12. Other operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization and write-downs of acquired goodwill |
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-downs of trade accounts receivable |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses from sales of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Litigation-related expenses |
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
(451 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous operating expenses |
|
|
(596 |
) |
|
|
(548 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,134 |
) |
|
|
(1,295 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses include 106 million incurred in connection with the termination
of the co-promotion agreement with GlaxoSmithKline for Levitra®. 162 million
(2004: minus 129 million) was spent on restructuring. Further details of restructuring
expenses are given in Note [29.3].
13. Costs by type
13.1 Cost of materials
The total cost of materials amounted to 9,726 million (2004: 8,871 million), comprising
8,896 million (2004: 7,948 million) in expenses for raw materials, supplies and goods
purchased for resale, and
830 million (2004: 923 million) in expenses for purchased services. The cost of materials is
allocated to the cost of goods sold or the respective operating expense items.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 121 |
13.2 Personnel expenses/employees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wages and salaries |
|
|
4,822 |
|
|
|
4,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Social expenses and expenses for pensions and other benefits |
|
|
1,204 |
|
|
|
1,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which for defined-contribution pension plans |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which for defined-benefit pension plans |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,026 |
|
|
|
5,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel expenses declined by 114 million to 5,912 million in 2005 (2004: 6,026
million). Of this decrease, 38 million was due to currency translations. Personnel expenses
are allocated to the cost of goods sold or the respective operating expense items. The
personnel expenses shown here do not include the interest portion of personnel-related
provisions (particularly pension provisions), which is included in the non-operating result as
other non-operating expense (see Note [15.3]).
In July 2005, it was decided to modify several of Bayers largest pension plans in the United
States, replacing these current defined-benefit plans with a purely defined-contribution
plan. The resulting reduction in pension obligations yielded a one-time reduction of 294
million in expenses for retirement pensions in fiscal 2005. Pension expense in fiscal 2004
was diminished by one-time income of 116 million resulting mainly from changes in the basic
conditions for the plan covering health care costs in the United States. These changes require
participating employees to assume a greater share of the costs through higher copayments and
proportionate contributions. In addition, a ceiling was introduced for the annual
contributions payable by companies.
The average number of employees, classified by corporate functions, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Marketing |
|
|
29,576 |
|
|
|
30,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology |
|
|
44,033 |
|
|
|
44,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and
development |
|
|
9,560 |
|
|
|
9,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General administration |
|
|
9,018 |
|
|
|
9,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,187 |
|
|
|
93,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which trainees |
|
|
2,545 |
|
|
|
2,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The employees of joint ventures are included
in the above figures in proportion to
Bayers interests in the respective
companies. The total number of people
employed by joint ventures in 2005 was
65 (2004: 31).
13.3 Other taxes
Other taxes amounting to 248 million (2004: 201 million) are included in the cost of
production, selling expenses, research and development expenses or general administration
expenses. These are mainly taxes related to property, as well as taxes on electricity and
other utilities.
|
|
|
124 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
14. Operating result (EBIT)
In December 2004 the IASB issued an amendment to IAS 19 (Employee Benefits) that permits
actuarial gains and losses arising in defined-benefit pension plans to be recognized
directly in equity without affecting the income statement. Further information on the
accounting for pension provisions is given in Note [28].
The Group Management Board decided to follow the recommendation of the IASB and implement the
above change as of January 1, 2005 in order to enhance the transparency of reporting. The
previous years figures have been restated accordingly. This reporting change leads to a 48
million improvement in the 2004 operating result from continuing operations. In view of its
immateriality to 2004 EBIT of the segments, the gain has been reflected solely in the
reconciliation column of the segment table.
Breakdowns of the operating result by segment and by region are given in the table on page 84 ff.
15. Non-operating result
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity-method loss1 |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income2 |
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating expenses3 |
|
|
(997 |
) |
|
|
(1,237 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(653 |
) |
|
|
(613 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The non-operating result, comprising the income statement items equity-method loss,
non-operating income and non-operating expenses, may be apportioned among the following
categories.
15.1 Loss from investments in affiliated companies net
The components of this item are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity-method loss1 |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-downs of investments in affiliated companies3 |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from affiliated companies and income from profit and loss transfer agreements2 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which 1 million (2004: 0 million) from subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains from the sale of investments in affiliated companies2 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses from the sale of investments in affiliated companies3 |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The loss from investments in affiliated companies mainly comprises an equity-method loss
of 47 million (2004: 131 million) from two production joint ventures with Lyondell. Further
details of the companies included at equity in the Group financial statements are given in
Note [21].
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 125 |
15.2 Interest expense net
This item comprises:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from other securities and loans2 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other interest and similar income2 |
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which 1 million (2004: 1 million) from subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and similar expenses3 |
|
|
(656 |
) |
|
|
(913 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which 1 million (2004: 9 million) to subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
(341 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This item mainly comprises interest expense for financial liabilities, value adjustments
relating to interest-rate hedging transactions, and interest income from investments.
Finance leases are capitalized under property, plant and equipment in compliance with IAS 17
(Leases). The interest portion of the lease payments, amounting to minus 18 million (2004:
minus 21 million), is reflected in interest expense.
Interest expense incurred to finance the construction phase of major investment projects is
not included here. Such interest expense, amounting in 2005 to 4 million (2004: 3 million),
is capitalized as part of the cost of acquisition or construction of the property, plant or
equipment concerned, based on an average capitalization rate of 4 percent (2004: 4 percent).
15.3 Other non-operating expense net
This item comprises:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest portion of interest-bearing provisions3 |
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
(246 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net exchange loss3 |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous non-operating expenses3 |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous non-operating income2 |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(281 |
) |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To enhance the transparency of reporting, the procedure for the treatment of actuarial
gains and losses relating to defined-benefit pension obligations has been altered as of
January 1, 2005. Under the new method of post-employment benefit accounting, unrealized
actuarial gains and losses, instead of being gradually amortized according to the corridor
method and recognized in income, are offset in their entirety against stockholders equity.
This reporting change reduced the interest expense for provisions for continuing operations by
78 million in fiscal 2004. Further information on the accounting for pension provisions is
given in Note [28].
|
|
|
126 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
16. Income taxes
This item comprises the income taxes paid or accrued in the individual countries, plus
deferred taxes.
The breakdown of income taxes by origin is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid or accrued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other countries |
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
(380 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(490 |
) |
|
|
(541 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from temporary differences |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from tax loss carryforwards |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(473 |
) |
|
|
(641 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In fiscal 2005 changes in tax rates decreased deferred tax expense by 2 million (2004: 5 million).
The deferred tax assets and liabilities are allocable to the various balance sheet items as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
tax |
|
|
tax |
|
|
tax |
|
|
tax |
|
|
|
assets |
|
|
liabilities |
|
|
assets |
|
|
liabilities |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
1,029 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension provisions |
|
|
1,102 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other provisions |
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax loss carryforwards |
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance for tax loss carryforwards |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(261 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,646 |
|
|
|
3,071 |
|
|
|
4,603 |
|
|
|
3,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Set-off |
|
|
(2,427 |
) |
|
|
(2,427 |
) |
|
|
(2,905 |
) |
|
|
(2,905 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
1,698 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 127 |
The following income tax assets and liabilities are therefore recognized in the balance sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total as at |
|
|
Of which |
|
|
Total as at |
|
|
Of which |
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
current |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
current |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
1,698 |
|
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims for tax refunds |
|
|
823 |
|
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,042 |
|
|
|
1,324 |
|
|
|
2,424 |
|
|
|
1,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total as at |
|
|
Of which |
|
|
Total as at |
|
|
Of which |
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
current |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
current |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions for income taxes |
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax liabilities |
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,054 |
|
|
|
1,491 |
|
|
|
1,387 |
|
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2005, deferred tax assets of 9 million and deferred tax liabilities of 47 million
relate to changes in the scope of consolidation. Utilization of tax loss carryforwards from
previous years diminished the amount of income taxes paid or accrued in 2005 by 97 million
(2004: 39 million).
The value of existing tax loss carryforwards by expiration date is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two years |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three years |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Four years |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five years and thereafter |
|
|
1,494 |
|
|
|
2,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
2,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets of 786 million (2004: 499 million) are recognized on the 2,031 million
(2004: 1,282 million) in tax loss carryforwards. It is considered that sufficient income will be
available in the future to utilize these tax assets. Recognition of these deferred tax assets
results in deferred tax income of 105 million (2004: 167 million). No deferred tax assets
are recognized on tax loss carryforwards totaling 687 million (2004: 218 million); these
carryforwards can theoretically be utilized over more than one year. In Germany, tax loss
carryforwards can be utilized against the whole of the first 1 million of current taxable
income but only against 60 percent of the remainder.
Deferred tax assets relating to deductible temporary differences and tax loss carryforwards
are carried at the amount considered sufficiently likely to be recoverable in the future by
offsetting against actual taxable income. In light of operating losses recently experienced in
certain jurisdictions, consideration was given to the taxable income available to the Group
along with prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. Based on the results of this
assessment, valuation allowances of 261 million for 2005 and 85 million for 2004 were
recorded against deferred taxes relating to loss carryforwards. These valuation allowances
relate primarily to certain types of operating loss carryforwards, capital loss carryforwards,
foreign tax credit carryforwards and charitable contribution carryforwards.
|
|
|
128 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
The increase in tax loss carryfowards and the associated deferred tax assets relating to
continuing operations in 2005 is attributable to the earnings-neutral spin-off of the LANXESS
subgroup effective January 31, 2005, which gave rise to 458 million in tax loss carryforwards
and 183 million in deferred tax assets. The additional carryforwards arose because tax
regulations required that the spin-off balance sheet of LANXESS as of January 31, 2005 reflect the amount of loss carryforwards assigned to the operations that were actually spun off,
and this amount differed from that previously assigned to the respective discontinued
operations of the Bayer Group on the basis of origin. The LANXESS data for 2004 are presented
from the standpoint of the Bayer Group as part of the segment reporting for that year and are
not intended to portray either these discontinued operations or the continuing operations of
Bayer as separate entities. The 560 million change in tax loss carryforwards compared with
the prior year also results from completed tax audits and from losses to be declared on the
spin-off of the LANXESS subgroup. Deferred tax assets were not recognized in relation to 224
million of the increase in loss carryforwards.
The Bayer Group recently entered into a closing agreement with the Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) in the United States for the tax years 1992 through 1998 resulting in certain
adjustments to our federal income tax liability for those years. Accordingly, our fiscal year
2005 tax provision has been reduced by 104 million as a result of reversing previously
established reserves in excess of the additional tax liability assessed by the IRS for the
1992-2002 tax years.
Deferred taxes have not been recognized for temporary differences of 4,283 million (2004:
3,662 million) relating to earnings of foreign subsidiaries, either because these profits
are not subject to taxation or because they are to be reinvested for an indefinite period.
If deferred taxes were recognized for these temporary differences, the liability would be
based on the respective withholding tax rates only, taking into account the German tax rate of
5 percent on corporate dividends where applicable. The amount of these unrecognized deferred
tax liabilities could not be derived with reasonable effort.
The actual tax expense for 2005 is 641 million (2004: 473 million). This figure differs by
133 million (2004: 45 million) from the expected tax expense of 774 million (2004: 428
million) that would result from applying to the pre-tax income of the Group a tax rate of 35.2
percent (2004: 35.1 percent), which is the weighted average of the theoretical tax rates for
the individual Group companies.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 129 |
The reconciliation of theoretical to actual income tax expense (income) for the Group is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
million |
|
|
% |
|
|
million |
|
|
% |
|
Theoretical income tax expense (income) |
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
774 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction in taxes due to tax-free income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-free income from affiliated companies and divestiture proceeds |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilization of off-balance-sheet loss carryforwards |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax provision reversal in the U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in taxes due to non-tax-deductible expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-downs of investments |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of goodwill |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses for litigation |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other tax effects |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual tax expense (income) |
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate in % |
|
|
38.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17. Minority stockholders interest in income/losses
Minority interest in income amounts to 21 million (2004: 13 million), and minority
interest in losses to 23 million (2004: 16 million).
18. Earnings per share () from continuing and discontinued operations
Earnings per share are determined according to IAS 33 (Earnings per Share) by dividing the
net income (loss) by the average number of shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
basic |
|
|
730,341,920 |
|
|
|
730,341,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive potential ordinary shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
diluted |
|
|
730,341,920 |
|
|
|
730,341,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income after taxes |
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
1,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
attributable to minority interest |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
attributable to Bayer AG stockholders (net income) |
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) after taxes from discontinued operations |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares |
|
|
730,341,920 |
|
|
|
730,341,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share () |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from continuing operations |
|
|
1.03 |
|
|
|
2.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from continuing and discontinued operations |
|
|
0.94 |
|
|
|
2.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share () |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from continuing operations |
|
|
1.03 |
|
|
|
2.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from continuing and discontinued operations |
|
|
0.94 |
|
|
|
2.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note [3] explains the main effects on the Bayer Group of changes in accounting standards.
The following table shows the effect on earnings per share of those standards that have a
material impact on the income statement of the Bayer Group. Since there are no subscription
rights outstanding, basic and diluted earnings per share are identical.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on earnings per share |
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Cessation of amortization of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible
assets in accordance with IFRS 3, IAS 36 and IAS 38 |
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offsetting of unrealized actuarial gains and losses in benefit accounting against
equity in accordance with IAS 19, amended 2004 |
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total effect of accounting changes on earnings per share |
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under the German Stock Corporation Act, the sum available for payment of the dividend is
determined from the balance sheet profit shown in the annual financial statements for
Bayer AG prepared in accordance with the German Commercial Code.
The dividend per share paid for the 2004 fiscal year was 0.55 (2003: 0.50). The proposed
dividend for fiscal 2005 is 0.95 per share. Payment of the proposed dividend is contingent
upon approval by the stockholders at the Annual Stockholders Meeting and has not been
recognized as a liability in the consolidated financial statements for the Bayer Group.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 131 |
Notes to the Balance Sheets
19. Goodwill and other intangible assets
Changes in intangible assets in 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired concessions, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
property rights, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
similar rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and assets, and |
|
|
Acquired |
|
|
Advance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
licenses thereunder |
|
|
goodwill |
|
|
payments |
|
|
Total |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amounts, Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
7,137 |
|
|
|
2,470 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
9,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences |
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elimination of accumulated amortization
prior to application of IFRS 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(643 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(643 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in scope of consolidation |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
1,384 |
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirements |
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(284 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amounts, Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
8,796 |
|
|
|
2,623 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
11,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization
and write-downs, Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
3,088 |
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elimination of accumulated amortization
prior to application of IFRS 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(643 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(643 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in scope of consolidation |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization and write-downs in 2005 |
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which write-downs |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-backs |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirements |
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization
and write-downs, Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
3,744 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amounts, Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
5,052 |
|
|
|
2,623 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
7,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amounts, Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
4,049 |
|
|
|
1,866 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
5,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The exchange differences are the differences between the carrying amounts at the beginning
and the end of the year that result from translating the figures of companies outside the
euro zone at the respective different exchange rates and changes in their assets during the
year at the average rate for the year. This translation method generally also applies to
acquisition-related goodwill and remeasurement amounts reflected in the statements of
companies outside the euro zone.
For further information on acquisitions and divestitures see Note [7.2]. Additional details of
the impairment testing procedure for goodwill and how goodwill is allocated among the
reporting segments are given in Note [4.5].
|
|
|
132 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Following the publication of IFRS 3 and the revised standards IAS 36 (Impairment of Assets)
and IAS 38 (Intangible Assets), goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are no
longer amortized as of January 1, 2005 but tested for impairment. There are no accumulated
value adjustments for goodwill.
The acquired concessions, industrial property rights, similar rights and assets, and licenses
thereunder in the Group can be assigned to the following categories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
distribution |
|
|
Production |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents |
|
|
Trademarks |
|
|
rights |
|
|
rights |
|
|
rights |
|
|
Total |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amounts,
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
1,634 |
|
|
|
1,029 |
|
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
1,933 |
|
|
|
1,915 |
|
|
|
7,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in scope of consolidation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
1,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirements |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amounts,
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
1,705 |
|
|
|
2,127 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
1,990 |
|
|
|
2,094 |
|
|
|
8,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization and
write-downs, Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
1,440 |
|
|
|
3,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in scope of consolidation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization and write-downs in 2005 |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which write-downs |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-backs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirements |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization and
write-downs, Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
667 |
|
|
|
1,594 |
|
|
|
3,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amounts, Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
1,691 |
|
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
1,323 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
5,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amounts, Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
1,032 |
|
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
1,423 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
4,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over the next five years, amortization of the intangible assets recognized in 2005 is
expected to be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated amortization of intangible assets |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
|
|
Possible future acquisitions and/or
divestments of intangible assets are not
taken into account in computing the above
amounts and may therefore cause them to vary.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 133 |
Changes in intangible assets in 2004 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired concessions, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
property rights, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
similar rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and assets, and |
|
|
Acquired |
|
|
Advance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
licenses thereunder |
|
|
goodwill |
|
|
payments |
|
|
Total |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amounts, Dec. 31, 2003 |
|
|
7,110 |
|
|
|
2,522 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
9,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences |
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in scope of consolidation |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirements |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(252 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amounts, Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
7,137 |
|
|
|
2,470 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
9,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization and write-downs,
Dec. 31, 2003 |
|
|
2,637 |
|
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in scope of consolidation |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization and write-downs in 2004 |
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which write-downs |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-backs |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirements |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization and write-downs,
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
3,088 |
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amounts, Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
4,049 |
|
|
|
1,866 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
5,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
20. Property, plant and equipment
Changes in property, plant and equipment in 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in progress |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and advance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furniture, |
|
|
payments to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant |
|
|
fixtures |
|
|
vendors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and |
|
|
installations |
|
|
and other |
|
|
and sub- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
buildings |
|
|
and machinery |
|
|
equipment |
|
|
contractors |
|
|
Total |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amounts,
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
6,562 |
|
|
|
12,021 |
|
|
|
1,873 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
20,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences |
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in scope of consolidation |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
1,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirements |
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
|
(304 |
) |
|
|
(239 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(728 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
(549 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amounts,
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
7,014 |
|
|
|
12,913 |
|
|
|
1,960 |
|
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
22,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and
write-downs, Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
3,610 |
|
|
|
8,292 |
|
|
|
1,397 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
13,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in scope of consolidation |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and write-downs in 2005 |
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which write-downs |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-backs |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirements |
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(634 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and
write-downs, Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
3,857 |
|
|
|
9,156 |
|
|
|
1,463 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
14,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amounts, Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
3,157 |
|
|
|
3,757 |
|
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
8,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amounts, Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
2,952 |
|
|
|
3,729 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
7,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The exchange differences are as defined for intangible assets.
Capitalized property, plant and equipment includes assets with a total net value of 316 million
(2004: 316 million) held under finance leases. The gross carrying amounts of these assets total 868
million (2004: 758 million).
These assets are mainly plant installations and machinery with a carrying amount of 221
million (gross amount: 717 million) and buildings with a carrying amount of 85 million
(gross amount: 122 million). In the case of buildings, either the present value of the
minimum lease payments covers substantially all of the cost of acquisition, or title passes to
the lessee on expiration of the lease.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 135 |
Also included are products leased to other parties under operating leases with a carrying amount of
202 million (2004: 176 million). The gross carrying amount of these assets was 589 million
(2004: 481 million); their depreciation in 2005 amounted to 72 million (2004: 65 million).
However, if under the relevant agreements the lessee is to be regarded as the economic owner
of the assets and the lease therefore constitutes a finance lease as defined in IAS 17
(Leases), a receivable is recognized in the balance sheet in the amount of the discounted
future lease payments.
Changes in property, plant and equipment in 2004 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in progress |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and advance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furniture, |
|
|
payments to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant |
|
|
fixtures |
|
|
vendors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and |
|
|
installations |
|
|
and other |
|
|
and sub- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
buildings |
|
|
and machinery |
|
|
equipment |
|
|
contractors |
|
|
Total |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amounts,
Dec. 31, 2003 |
|
|
6,362 |
|
|
|
12,309 |
|
|
|
1,897 |
|
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
21,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(261 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in scope of consolidation |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirements |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(466 |
) |
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(799 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
(640 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amounts,
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
6,562 |
|
|
|
12,021 |
|
|
|
1,873 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
20,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and
write-downs, Dec. 31, 2003 |
|
|
3,344 |
|
|
|
8,111 |
|
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
12,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(208 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in scope of consolidation |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and write-downs in 2004 |
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which write-downs |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-backs |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirements |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(340 |
) |
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(582 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and
write-downs, Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
3,610 |
|
|
|
8,292 |
|
|
|
1,397 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
13,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amounts, Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
2,952 |
|
|
|
3,729 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
7,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
21. Investments in associates
Changes in investments in associates in 2005 were as follows:
Investments in associates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount, Jan. 1 |
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity-method loss |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount, Dec. 31 |
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Groups significant investments in
associates include the following companies:
For various strategic reasons, the Bayer
MaterialScience subgroup holds or is
responsible for interests in companies that
are included at equity in the consolidated financial statements of the Bayer Group. As
part of the forward integration strategy of
the Polycarbonates business unit, minority
interests in two Israeli companies were
purchased in 1998: a 26 percent interest in
Polygal and a 20 percent interest in
Palthough. Both of these companies
manufacture polycarbonate sheets for industrial, agricultural and other uses, mainly from
polycarbonate (Makrolon®) granules supplied by Bayer. Two members of each companys
board of directors are Bayer Group employees.
In 1998, Bayer transferred its silicones business to GE Bayer Silicones, a joint venture
(Bayers interest: 49.9 percent) with General Electric Plastics USA (GE), as part of the
strategic realignment of what was then its Chemicals business area. The strategic objective
was to leverage synergies in research and development, production, marketing and distribution.
GE Bayer Silicones is now one of the worlds largest suppliers of sealants and other
silicone-based products, with production facilities in Leverkusen, Germany, and Bergen op
Zoom, Netherlands. Two members of the Shareholder Committee of GE Bayer Silicones are
employees of the Bayer Group.
In 2000, Bayer acquired the polyols business and parts of the propylene oxide (po) production
operations of Lyondell Chemicals. The strategic objective is to ensure access to patented
technologies and safeguard the long-term supply of PO, a starting product for polyurethane, at
reasonable prices. As part of this strategy, two joint ventures have been established to
produce PO: PO JV Delaware USA (Bayers interest: 43 percent) and Lyondell Bayer Manufacturing
Maasvlakte VOF, Netherlands (Bayers interest: 50 percent). The PO facility in Maasvlakte near
Rotterdam, Netherlands, which came on stream in 2003, is a world-scale production facility
using Lyondells patented PO/SM technology. Both facilities are operated by Lyondell. Bayer
benefits from fixed long-term supply quotas/volumes of PO based on fixed price components.
The difference between the equity interest in the underlying net assets of associates and
their at-equity accounting values is 12 million (2004: 12 million). It mainly relates to
acquired goodwill.
The following table presents a summary of the aggregated income statements and balance sheet
data for the companies included at equity in the consolidated financial statements of the
Bayer Group (associates).
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 137 |
Associates aggregated income statement data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
1,236 |
|
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayers share of net loss |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other1 |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from investments in
associates (equity-method loss) |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associates aggregated balance sheet data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent assets |
|
|
1,468 |
|
|
|
1,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
1,541 |
|
|
|
1,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayers share of stockholders equity |
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other1 |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount of associates |
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
The category other mainly comprises differences arising from adjustments of
data to Bayers accounting policies, purchase price allocations and their
amortization in income, and impairment losses. |
22. Other financial assets
Other financial assets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
current |
|
|
Total |
|
|
current |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investments |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale financial instruments |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity financial instruments |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous financial assets |
|
|
1,094 |
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,963 |
|
|
|
794 |
|
|
|
1,643 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in subsidiaries |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in associates |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries and joint ventures that do not have a material impact on assets and earnings
either individually or in aggregate are not consolidated. They are reflected at fair value,
which generally corresponds to amortized cost. This also applies to immaterial associates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
current |
|
|
Total |
|
|
current |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which to subsidiaries |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which to other affiliated companies |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which to third parties |
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
current |
|
|
Total |
|
|
current |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale financial instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which equity instruments |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which debt instruments |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity financial instruments |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in available-for-sale financial instruments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amounts, Jan. 1 |
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in scope of consolidation |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair value [gains] |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair value [losses] |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other additions |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirements |
|
|
(263 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amounts, Dec. 31 |
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated write-downs, Jan. 1 |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in scope of consolidation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-downs during the year |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-backs |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirements |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated write-downs, Dec. 31 |
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amounts, Dec. 31 |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The miscellaneous financial assets comprise the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
current |
|
|
Total |
|
|
current |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables from short-term loans |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables from commodity futures contracts |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables from other derivative financial instruments |
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease payments receivable |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining miscellaneous financial assets |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,094 |
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial assets include 36 million (2004: 36 million) pertaining to
non-consolidated subsidiaries. The amount pertaining to associates was 3 million (2004: 5
million). No items of other financial assets pertained to other affiliated companies in 2005
or 2004.
Further information on the accounting for receivables from derivative financial instruments
is given in Note [33].
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 139 |
Lease agreements in which the other party, as lessee, is to be regarded as the economic owner
of the leased assets (finance leases) give rise to accounts receivable in the amount of the
discounted future lease payments. These receivables amount to 109 million (2004: 58
million), while the interest portion pertaining to future years amounts to 18 million (2004:
5 million).
The lease payments are due as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
under |
|
|
|
Lease |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
finance |
|
Maturing in |
|
payments |
|
|
component |
|
|
leases |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 or later |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
under |
|
|
|
Lease |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
finance |
|
Maturing in |
|
payments |
|
|
component |
|
|
leases |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 or later |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23. Other receivables
Other receivables, less write-downs of 14 million (2004: 4 million) are comprised as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
current |
|
|
Total |
|
|
current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit plan assets in excess of obligations |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payroll receivables |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred charges |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royalties receivable |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest receivable on loans |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous receivables |
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,656 |
|
|
|
1,543 |
|
|
|
1,620 |
|
|
|
1,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest receivable on loans consists mainly of interest earned in the fiscal year but
not due to be received until after the balance sheet date.
Of the total amount of this item, 5 million (2004: 6 million) was receivable from
non-consolidated subsidiaries and 7 million (2004: 5 million) from associates. As in the
previous year, there were no such receivables from other affiliated companies.
Total deferred charges include 193 million (2004: 142 million) that is expected to be used up in
2006.
|
|
|
140 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
24. Inventories
Of the 5,504 million in inventories carried as of December 31, 2005 (2004: 4,738
million), 814 million (2004: 967 million) represents inventories carried at fair value less
costs to sell.
Inventories comprised the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials and supplies |
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Work in process, finished goods and goods purchased for resale |
|
|
3,811 |
|
|
|
4,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advance payments |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,738 |
|
|
|
5,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The changes in the inventory reserve, which are reflected in the cost of goods sold, were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
(304 |
) |
|
|
(311 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions charged to income |
|
|
(171 |
) |
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in scope of consolidation |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deductions due to utilization |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
(311 |
) |
|
|
(340 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25. Trade accounts receivable
Trade accounts receivable include a reserve of 334 million (2004: 273 million) for
amounts unlikely to be recovered.
Trade accounts receivable as of December 31, 2005 include 5,162 million (2004: 4,464
million) maturing within one year and 42 million (2004: 11 million) maturing after one year.
Of the total amount, 10 million (2004: 9 million) was receivable from non-consolidated
subsidiaries, 36 million (2004: 40 million) from associates, 1 million (2004: 1 million)
from other affiliated companies and 5,157 million (2004: 4,425 million) from other customers.
Changes in write-downs of trade accounts receivable are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
(280 |
) |
|
|
(273 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions charged to expense |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in scope of consolidation |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deductions due to utilization |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
(273 |
) |
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 141 |
26. Liquid assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities and other instruments |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
3,570 |
|
|
|
3,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,599 |
|
|
|
3,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which earmarked for antitrust payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments with original maturities of up to three months are recognized as
cash equivalents in view of their high liquidity. Liquidity totaling 253 million has been
deposited in escrow accounts intended solely for making payments relating to antitrust fines
and civil law settlements. For further information on legal risks see Note [35].
Marketable securities and other instruments held as of December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Debt |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Debt |
|
|
|
instruments |
|
|
instruments |
|
|
instruments |
|
|
instruments |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition cost amortized to income |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair-value losses recognized in equity |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair-value gains recognized in equity |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet value |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27. Changes in stockholders equity
The components of stockholders equity and their changes during 2005 and 2004 are shown in
the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
attributable |
|
|
attributable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
stock of |
|
|
reserves of |
|
|
Other |
|
|
to Bayer AG |
|
|
to minority |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Bayer AG |
|
|
Bayer AG |
|
|
reserves |
|
|
stockholders |
|
|
interest |
|
|
equity |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2003 |
|
|
1,870 |
|
|
|
2,942 |
|
|
|
6,355 |
|
|
|
11,167 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
11,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other changes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(347 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
1,870 |
|
|
|
2,942 |
|
|
|
6,020 |
|
|
|
10,832 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
10,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spin-off of LANXESS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,059 |
) |
|
|
(1,059 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(1,078 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other changes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,304 |
|
|
|
1,304 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
1,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
1,870 |
|
|
|
2,942 |
|
|
|
6,265 |
|
|
|
11,077 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
11,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
The capital stock of Bayer AG amounts to 1,870 million, as in the previous year, and is
divided into 730,341,920 no-par bearer shares of a single class.
Authorized capital totaling 250 million was approved by the Annual Stockholders Meeting on
April 26, 2002. It expires on April 26, 2007. The authorized capital can be used to increase
the capital stock by issuing new shares against cash contributions. The Board of Management is
authorized to exclude subscription rights with respect to 100 million of this authorized
capital; however, in this case the issue price of the new shares must not be significantly
below the market price. Exclusion of subscription rights for a further 150 million is only
possible in specific cases.
Further authorized capital in the amount of 374 million was approved by the Annual
Stockholders Meeting on April 27, 2001. This authorized capital, which expires on April 27,
2006, can be used to increase the capital stock by issuing new shares against non-cash
contributions. Subscription rights for existing stockholders are excluded.
Conditional capital of 187 million existed on December 31, 2005. This capital may only be
utilized to the extent necessary to issue the requisite number of shares as and when
conversion or subscription rights are exercised by the holders of convertible bonds or of
warrants conferring subscription rights, respectively, that may be issued by Bayer AG, or
Group companies in which Bayer AG holds a direct or indirect interest of at least 90 percent,
through April 29, 2009.
Capital reserves include the paid-in surplus from the issuance of shares and subscription
rights by Bayer AG.
The categories of other reserves and their changes during 2005 and 2004 are shown in the
following table.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Currency |
|
|
Fair-value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revaluation |
|
|
retained |
|
|
income |
|
|
translation |
|
|
remeasurement |
|
|
Cashflow |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
surplus |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
(loss) |
|
|
adjustment |
|
|
of securities |
|
|
hedges |
|
|
reserves |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2003 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
9,375 |
|
|
|
(1,303 |
) |
|
|
(1,699 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
6,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in stockholders equity not recognized
in net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair-value remeasurement of securities
and cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in accumulated actuarial gains (losses)
on defined benefit obligations for pensions and
other post-employment benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(740 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(740 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences on translation
of operations outside the euro zone |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(304 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(304 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes on valuation adjustments offset
directly against stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other changes in stockholders equity |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer of changes recognized in income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
8,903 |
|
|
|
(1,303 |
) |
|
|
(2,003 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
5,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(365 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(365 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation from retained earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,668 |
) |
|
|
1,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1,668 |
) |
|
|
1,303 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(365 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in stockholders equity recognized
in net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
7,235 |
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
(2,003 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
6,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spin-off of LANXESS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,438 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,059 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in stockholders equity not recognized
in net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair-value remeasurement of securities
and cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in accumulated actuarial gains (losses)
on defined benefit obligations for pensions and
other post-employment benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences on translation
of operations outside the euro zone |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes on valuation adjustments offset
directly against stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other changes in stockholders equity |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer of changes recognized in income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
5,064 |
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
(775 |
) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
5,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation to retained earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
(685 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in stockholders equity recognized
in net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
5,347 |
|
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
(775 |
) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
6,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
The equity effect of the revaluation of assets relating to acquisitions made in stages was
recognized for the first time in fiscal 2004 in compliance with IFRS 3 (Business
Combinations). If an enterprise is acquired in several stages, it has to be completely
revalued on the date on which the acquiring company gains control. All assets and liabilities
of the enterprise must be recognized at fair value. If the new fair value of the assets
already held by the acquiring company exceeds their carrying amount, the carrying amount must
be increased accordingly. This adjustment is recognized in a separate equity item (revaluation
surplus) and thus has no effect on net income. The revaluation surplus of 66 million reported
under stockholders equity is entirely due to the acquisition of the remaining 50 percent
interest in an OTC joint venture with Roche in the United States that was established in 1996.
In 2005 the 4 million portion of the revaluation surplus that was recognized in income
through scheduled amortization/depreciation of the respective assets was transferred to
retained earnings.
The retained earnings contain prior years undistributed income of consolidated companies.
Under the amended version of IAS 19 (Employee Benefits), which introduces a new option for
the accounting treatment of actuarial gains and losses from defined benefit plans, all such
gains and losses are recognized in the retained earnings of the Bayer Group. Further details
of this accounting change are given in Note [3], which addresses the effects of new accounting
pronouncements.
Changes in fair values of cash flow hedges and available-for-sale securities are recognized
in other comprehensive income.
Exchange differences relating to the operations of companies outside the euro zone compared
with the respective closing rates are recognized separately in the currency translation
adjustment item of other comprehensive income.
The components of third-party minority interests in Group equity and their changes during 2005
and 2004 are shown in the following table.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity attributable to |
|
|
|
minority interest |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan. 1 |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spin-off of LANXESS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in stockholders equity not recognized in net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair-value remeasurement of securities and cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in accumulated actuarial gains (losses) on defined benefit
obligations for pensions and other post-employment benefits |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences on translation of operations outside the euro zone |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes on valuation adjustments offset directly against stockholders equity |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other changes in stockholders equity |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend payments |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation to/from retained earnings |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in stockholders equity recognized in net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31 |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starting in 2005, minority interests must be shown in the Group balance sheet as a
component of stockholders equity rather than as a separate item between stockholders equity
and liabilities. The retrospective application of this change as of January 1, 2004 increased
stockholders equity of the Group in 2005 by 80 million (2004: 111 million).
Minority stockholders interest mainly comprises third parties shares in the equity of the
consolidated subsidiaries Bayer CropScience Limited, India; Sumika Bayer Urethane Co. Ltd.,
Japan; Bayer Polymers Co., Ltd., China; Bayer CropScience Nufarm Ltd., United Kingdom; Bayer
Diagnostics India Limited, India; and H.C. Starck (Thailand) Company Limited, Thailand.
28. Provisions for pensions and other post-employment benefits
The provisions for pensions and other post-employment benefits are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pensions |
|
|
Other post-employment benefits |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
million |
|
Germany |
|
|
4,531 |
|
|
|
5,657 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
4,715 |
|
|
|
5,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other countries |
|
|
1,003 |
|
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
1,504 |
|
|
|
1,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
5,534 |
|
|
|
6,489 |
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
6,219 |
|
|
|
7,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group companies provide retirement benefits for most of their employees, either directly
or by contributing to independently administered funds.
|
|
|
146 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
The way these benefits are provided varies according to the legal, fiscal and economic
conditions of each country, the benefits generally being based on the employees remuneration
and years of service. The obligations relate both to existing retirees pensions and to
pension entitlements of future retirees.
Group companies provide retirement benefits under defined contribution and/or defined
benefit plans.
In the case of defined contribution plans, the company pays contributions to publicly or
privately administered pension insurance plans on a mandatory, contractual or voluntary basis.
Once the contributions have been paid, the company has no further payment obligations.
The regular contributions constitute net periodic costs for the year in which they are due and
as such are included in the cost of goods sold, selling expenses, research and development
expenses or general administration expenses, and thus in the operating result. In 2005, these
expenses totaled 341 million (2004: 284 million).
All other retirement benefit systems are defined benefit plans, which may be either
unfunded, i.e. financed by
provisions (accruals), or funded, i.e. financed through pension funds. In 2005, expenses for
defined benefit plans amounted to 183 million (2004: 420 million).
All income and expenses relating to funded defined benefit plans apart from interest cost
and the expected return on plan assets are recognized in the Group operating result. Interest
cost and the expected return on plan assets are reflected in the non-operating result.
In December 2004, the IASB issued an amendment to IAS 19 (Employee Benefits). The amendment
introduces an additional recognition option that permits actuarial gains and losses arising in
post-employment defined benefit plans, along with deductions for asset limitation due to the
uncertainty of obtaining future benefits, to be recognized directly in stockholders equity.
This option is similar to the approach provided in the U.K. standard FRS 17 (Retirement Benefits), which requires recognition of all actuarial gains and losses in a statement of total
recognized gains and losses that is separate from the income statement. The Group Management
Board has decided to follow the recommendation of the IASB and implement the above change for
fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2005 in order to enhance the transparency of
reporting. The prior-year figures have been restated accordingly.
Previously, in Bayer Group statements, actuarial gains and losses outside of the corridor
were recognized in the income statement as income or expense, respectively, over the average
remaining service period of existing employees. Under the new method of post-employment benefit accounting, unrealized actuarial gains and losses, instead of being gradually amortized
according to the corridor method and recognized in income, are offset in their entirety
against stockholders equity. Thus, no amortization of actuarial gains and losses is
recognized in income. Recognizing actuarial gains and losses directly in equity also affects
the amounts of receivables and of provisions for pensions and other post-employment benefits
stated in the balance sheet, compared with those computed by the previous corridor method.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 147 |
The impact of these changes on the relevant balance sheet items as of December 31, 2004 was
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
amount before |
|
|
Impact of |
|
|
amount after |
|
|
|
the change |
|
|
change |
|
|
the change |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit plan assets in excess of obligations |
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
936 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held for sale and discontinued operations |
|
|
4,788 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
4,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity and Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other reserves |
|
|
7,452 |
|
|
|
(1,432 |
) |
|
|
6,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions for pensions and other post-employment benefits |
|
|
4,581 |
|
|
|
1,638 |
|
|
|
6,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
1,171 |
|
|
|
(527 |
) |
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities directly related to assets
held for sale and discontinued operations |
|
|
2,282 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
2,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reporting change improves the 2004 operating result from continuing operations by 48
million and the non-operating result by 78 million. Application of IAS 19 (amended 2004)
leads to a deferred tax expense of 50 million.
In 2005 Bayer continued to drive forward the reorganization of its corporate pension systems
around the world, particularly in Germany and the United States. The basic and supplementary
pension plans for employees joining the company in Germany after January 1, 2005, have been
restructured. All employees joining Bayer after this date are insured with the Rheinische
Pensionskasse (RPK) which was established for this purpose. Employees who
joined Bayer prior to January 1, 2005 remain insured with the Bayer Pensionskasse. The RPK
operates on the same basic principle as life insurance, encouraging employees to take
responsibility for safeguarding their overall retirement incomes. In the RPK, the employees
and the company make equal contributions to finance the basic pension, which is based on a
guaranteed interest rate of 2.75 percent per annum plus the distribution of any surplus.
In July 2005, it was decided to modify several of Bayers largest pension plans in the United
States, replacing these current defined-benefit plans with a purely defined-contribution
plan. All pension entitlements under the modified defined benefit plans have been
determined as of December 31, 2005 and frozen. Effective January 1, 2006, Bayer makes a basic
retirement contribution equal to 5 percent of eligible compensation, plus additional
contributions that depend on age and years of pensionable service as of December 31, 2005. The
resulting reduction in pension obligations led to pre-tax income of 294 million in fiscal
2005.
Early retirement and certain other benefits to retirees are also included here, since these
obligations are similar in character to pension obligations. Like pension obligations, they
are measured in line with international standards. In 2005, provisions for early retirement
and other post-employment benefits amounted to 685 million (2004: 685 million).
|
|
|
148 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Provisions are also set up for the obligations of Group companies, particularly in the United
States, to provide post-employment benefits in the form of health care cost payments to
retirees. The valuation of health care costs as of December 31, 2005 is based on the
assumption that they will increase at a rate of 10 percent, which should gradually reduce to 8
percent by 2007. As of December 31, 2004 it was assumed that costs would increase at a rate of
10 percent, which would reduce to 8 percent by 2006. The table shows the impact of a
one-percentage-point change in the assumed rate of cost increases, based on the parameters
used for 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase of one |
|
|
Decrease of one |
|
|
|
percentage point |
|
|
percentage point |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact on pension expense |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact on other post-employment benefit obligations |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net expense of 5 million relating to other post-employment benefits was recorded in
2005, compared with income of 52 million in 2004. This is comprised of 47 million (2004: 60
million) in current service cost, 56 million (2004: 56 million) in interest cost, 27
million (2004: 24 million) in expected return on plan assets, and 71 million (2004: 144
million) in income from subsequent adjustments of benefit entitlements.
Changes were made to the basic conditions for the plan covering health care costs in the
United States in 2004. These changes essentially require employees participating in the plan
to assume a greater share of the costs through higher copayments and proportionate
contributions. In addition, a ceiling was introduced for the annual contributions payable by
companies. The resulting 197 million reduction in obligations for vested benefits as defined by IAS 19 resulted in pre-tax income of 139 million in 2004.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 149 |
The costs for the plans comprise the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
Other post-employment |
|
|
|
obligations |
|
|
benefit obligations |
|
Germany |
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current service cost |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Past service cost |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost |
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan curtailments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
Other post-employment |
|
|
|
obligations |
|
|
benefit obligations |
|
Other countries |
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current service cost |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Past service cost |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan curtailments |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
(317 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan settlements |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
Other post-employment |
|
|
|
obligations |
|
|
benefit obligations |
|
Total |
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current service cost |
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Past service cost |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost |
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(484 |
) |
|
|
(474 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan curtailments |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
(317 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan settlements |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provisions for defined benefit plans are calculated in accordance with IAS 19
(Employee Benefits) by the projected unit credit method. The future benefit obligations are
valued by actuarial methods on the basis of an appropriate assessment of the relevant
parameters. Funds and benefit obligations are valued on a regular basis at least every three
years. For all major funds, comprehensive actuarial valuations are performed annually. All
pension and other post-employment benefit obligations worldwide were measured as of December
31, 2005.
|
|
|
150 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Benefits expected to be payable after retirement are spread over each employees entire
period of employment, allowing for future changes in remuneration.
The Bayer Group has set up funded pension plans for its employees in many countries. Since the
legal and tax requirements and economic conditions may vary considerably between countries,
assets are managed according to country-specific principles. The Bayer-Pensionskasse in
Germany is by far the most significant of the pension funds.
The legally independent fund Bayer Pensionskasse VvaG (Bayer-Pensionskasse) is a private
insurance company and is therefore subject to the German Law on the Supervision of Private
Insurance Companies. Since Bayer guarantees the commitments of the Bayer-Pensionskasse, it is
classified as a defined benefit plan for IFRS purposes. The fair value of the plan assets
includes real estate leased by Bayer which is recognized at a fair value of 56 million (2004:
62 million).
Bayer AG has undertaken to provide profit-sharing capital in the form of an
interest-bearing loan totaling 150 million for the Bayer-Pensionskasse. The entire amount was
drawn as of December 31, 2005.
The investment policy of Bayer-Pensionskasse is geared to complying with regulatory provisions
governing the risk structure of its obligations. In light of capital market movements,
Bayer-Pensionskasse has therefore developed a target investment portfolio aligned to an
appropriate risk structure. Its investment strategy focuses principally on stringent
management of downside risks rather than on maximizing absolute returns. It is anticipated
that this investment policy can generate a return that enables it to meet its long-term
commitments.
In other countries, too, the key criteria for the funds investment strategies are the
structure of the benefit obligations and the risk profile. Other determinants are risk
diversification, portfolio efficiency and a country-specific and global risk/return profile
capable of ensuring the payment of all future benefits.
At year end, plan assets to cover pension obligations were allocated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany |
|
|
Other countries |
|
Plan assets as of December 31 |
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities (directly held) |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
59.01 |
|
|
|
50.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
|
52.50 |
|
|
|
53.75 |
|
|
|
33.04 |
|
|
|
41.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special securities funds |
|
|
22.38 |
|
|
|
25.65 |
|
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate and special real-estate funds |
|
|
12.65 |
|
|
|
12.13 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
1.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
12.43 |
|
|
|
8.43 |
|
|
|
7.34 |
|
|
|
6.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 151 |
The target asset allocation structure for 2006 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
Target structure 2006 |
|
Germany |
|
|
countries |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities (directly held) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
48.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
|
4060 |
|
|
|
40.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special securities funds |
|
|
1030 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate and special real-estate funds |
|
|
1025 |
|
|
|
3.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
7.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations in Germany to pay early retirement benefits are financed entirely by provisions.
At year end, plan assets to cover other funded post-employment benefit obligations were
allocated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany |
|
|
Other countries |
|
Plan assets as of December 31 |
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities (directly held) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.20 |
|
|
|
56.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.00 |
|
|
|
35.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special securities funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate and special real-estate funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.80 |
|
|
|
8.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
Target structure 2006 |
|
Germany |
|
|
countries |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities (directly held) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
53.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special securities funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate and special real-estate funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the closing dates, plan assets
included roughly the same weightings of Bayer
shares as the major stock indexes.
All defined benefit plans necessitate
actuarial computations and valuations. These
are based not only on life expectancy but
also on the following parameters, which vary
from country to country according to economic
conditions:
|
|
|
152 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
The weighted parameters used in Germany as of December 31 of the respective year were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany |
|
Pension |
|
|
Other post-employment |
|
|
|
obligations |
|
|
benefit obligations |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used to determine benefit expense |
|
|
5.50 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
3.50 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used to determine benefit obligation |
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
4.25 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected future remuneration increases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used to determine benefit expense |
|
|
2.50 |
|
|
|
2.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used to determine benefit obligation |
|
|
2.50 |
|
|
|
2.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected future benefit increases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used to determine benefit expense |
|
|
1.25 |
|
|
|
1.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used to determine benefit obligation |
|
|
1.25 |
|
|
|
1.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected employee turnover
(according to age and gender) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used to determine benefit expense |
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
5.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted parameters used outside Germany as of December 31 of the respective year were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other countries |
|
Pension |
|
|
Other post-employment |
|
|
|
obligations |
|
|
benefit obligations |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used to determine benefit expense |
|
|
6.10 |
|
|
|
5.75 |
|
|
|
6.25 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used to determine benefit obligation |
|
|
5.75 |
|
|
|
5.50 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected future remuneration increases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used to determine benefit expense |
|
|
4.20 |
|
|
|
4.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used to determine benefit obligation |
|
|
4.10 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected future benefit increases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used to determine benefit expense |
|
|
2.90 |
|
|
|
2.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used to determine benefit obligation |
|
|
2.70 |
|
|
|
2.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected employee turnover
(according to age and gender) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used to determine benefit expense |
|
|
7.70 |
|
|
|
7.50 |
|
|
|
8.25 |
|
|
|
8.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 153 |
Overall, the weighted parameters were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Pension |
|
|
Other post-employment |
|
|
|
obligations |
|
|
benefit obligations |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used to determine benefit expense |
|
|
5.90 |
|
|
|
5.20 |
|
|
|
5.70 |
|
|
|
5.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used to determine benefit obligation |
|
|
5.20 |
|
|
|
4.60 |
|
|
|
5.40 |
|
|
|
5.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected future remuneration increases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used to determine benefit expense |
|
|
3.00 |
|
|
|
2.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used to determine benefit obligation |
|
|
2.95 |
|
|
|
2.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected future benefit increases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used to determine benefit expense |
|
|
1.45 |
|
|
|
1.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used to determine benefit obligation |
|
|
1.40 |
|
|
|
1.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected employee turnover
(according to age and gender) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used to determine benefit expense |
|
|
6.35 |
|
|
|
6.35 |
|
|
|
8.25 |
|
|
|
8.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The expected long-term return on plan assets is determined on the basis of published and
internal capital market reports and forecasts for each asset class.
|
|
|
154 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
The status of unfunded and funded defined benefit obligations, computed using the
appropriate parameters, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany |
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
Other post-employment |
|
|
|
obligations |
|
|
benefit obligations |
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit obligation at beginning of year |
|
|
8,099 |
|
|
|
8,866 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current service cost |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost |
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee contributions |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan changes |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial (gain) loss |
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation differences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
(432 |
) |
|
|
(436 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mergers/acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Divestitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan curtailments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit obligation at year end |
|
|
8,866 |
|
|
|
10,256 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year |
|
|
4,240 |
|
|
|
4,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets |
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mergers/acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Divestitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation differences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contributions |
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee contributions |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
(432 |
) |
|
|
(436 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at year end |
|
|
4,373 |
|
|
|
4,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status at year end |
|
|
(4,493 |
) |
|
|
(5,657 |
) |
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized past service cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized transition obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset limitation due to uncertainty of obtaining future benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net recognized liability |
|
|
(4,493 |
) |
|
|
(5,657 |
) |
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in the balance sheet Prepaid benefit assets |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions for pensions and other post-employment benefits |
|
|
(4,531 |
) |
|
|
(5,657 |
) |
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net recognized liability |
|
|
(4,493 |
) |
|
|
(5,657 |
) |
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other countries |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
Other post-employment |
|
|
Pension |
|
|
Other post-employment |
|
|
|
obligations |
|
|
benefit obligations |
|
|
obligations |
|
|
benefit obligations |
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit obligation at beginning of year |
|
|
3,746 |
|
|
|
3,807 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
11,845 |
|
|
|
12,673 |
|
|
|
1,088 |
|
|
|
908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current service cost |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee contributions |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan changes |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan settlements |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial (gain) loss |
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
1,422 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation differences |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(614 |
) |
|
|
(634 |
) |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mergers/acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Divestitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan curtailments |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(317 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(317 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit obligation at year end |
|
|
3,807 |
|
|
|
4,269 |
|
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
12,673 |
|
|
|
14,525 |
|
|
|
908 |
|
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year |
|
|
2,675 |
|
|
|
2,841 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
6,915 |
|
|
|
7,214 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets |
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mergers/acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Divestitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan settlements |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation differences |
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contributions |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee contributions |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(614 |
) |
|
|
(634 |
) |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at year end |
|
|
2,841 |
|
|
|
3,485 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
7,214 |
|
|
|
8,084 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status at year end |
|
|
(966 |
) |
|
|
(784 |
) |
|
|
(438 |
) |
|
|
(519 |
) |
|
|
(5,459 |
) |
|
|
(6,441 |
) |
|
|
(622 |
) |
|
|
(677 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized past service cost |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized transition obligation |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset limitation due to uncertainty of obtaining future benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net recognized liability |
|
|
(969 |
) |
|
|
(795 |
) |
|
|
(501 |
) |
|
|
(527 |
) |
|
|
(5,462 |
) |
|
|
(6,452 |
) |
|
|
(685 |
) |
|
|
(685 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in the balance sheet Prepaid benefit assets |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions for pensions and other post-employment benefits |
|
|
(1,003 |
) |
|
|
(832 |
) |
|
|
(501 |
) |
|
|
(527 |
) |
|
|
(5,534 |
) |
|
|
(6,489 |
) |
|
|
(685 |
) |
|
|
(685 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net recognized liability |
|
|
(969 |
) |
|
|
(795 |
) |
|
|
(501 |
) |
|
|
(527 |
) |
|
|
(5,462 |
) |
|
|
(6,452 |
) |
|
|
(685 |
) |
|
|
(685 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
As already mentioned, all defined benefit plans necessitate actuarial computations and
valuations. The following table shows the impact of a change in any of these parameters,
assuming the other parameters remain unchanged, on the defined benefit obligation at the end
of fiscal 2005 and expense for 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other post-employment benefit |
Germany |
|
Pension obligations |
|
obligations |
|
|
0.5 percentage |
|
0.5 percentage |
|
0.5 percentage |
|
0.5 percentage |
million |
|
point increase |
|
point decrease |
|
point increase |
|
point decrease |
Change in discount rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation 2005
|
|
(730 |
) |
827 |
|
(1 |
) |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit expense 2006
|
|
7 |
|
(7 |
) |
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in projected future remuneration increases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation 2005
|
|
89 |
|
(81 |
) |
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit expense 2006
|
|
10 |
|
(9 |
) |
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in projected future benefit increases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation 2005
|
|
549 |
|
(504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit expense 2006
|
|
34 |
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in expected return on plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit expense 2006
|
|
(23 |
) |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other post-employment benefit |
Other countries |
|
Pension obligations |
|
obligations |
|
|
0.5 percentage |
|
0.5 percentage |
|
0.5 percentage |
|
0.5 percentage |
million |
|
point increase |
|
point decrease |
|
point increase |
|
point decrease |
Change in discount rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation 2005
|
|
(292 |
) |
328 |
|
(58 |
) |
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit expense 2006
|
|
5 |
|
(6 |
) |
3 |
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in projected future remuneration increases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation 2005
|
|
42 |
|
(39 |
) |
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit expense 2006
|
|
5 |
|
(5 |
) |
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in projected future benefit increases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation 2005
|
|
71 |
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit expense 2006
|
|
4 |
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in expected return on plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit expense 2006
|
|
(17 |
) |
17 |
|
(2 |
) |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other post-employment benefit |
|
Total |
|
Pension obligations |
|
|
obligations |
|
|
|
0.5 percentage |
|
|
0.5 percentage |
|
|
0.5 percentage |
|
|
0.5 percentage |
|
million |
|
point increase |
|
|
point decrease |
|
|
point increase |
|
|
point decrease |
|
Change in discount rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation 2005 |
|
|
(1,022 |
) |
|
|
1,155 |
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit expense 2006 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in projected future remuneration increases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation 2005 |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit expense 2006 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in projected future benefit increases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation 2005 |
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
(549 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit expense 2006 |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in expected return on plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit expense 2006 |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 157 |
The following employer contributions were made in 2005 and 2004, and are expected to be made
in 2006, in connection with defined benefit obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other post-employment |
|
|
|
Pension obligations |
|
|
benefit obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
projected |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
projected |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany |
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other countries |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pensions and other post-employment benefits payable in the future are estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany |
|
|
Other countries |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other post- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other post- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other post- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
employment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
employment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
employment |
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
benefit |
|
|
Pension |
|
|
benefit |
|
|
Pension |
|
|
benefit |
|
|
|
obligations |
|
|
obligations |
|
|
obligations |
|
|
obligations |
|
|
obligations |
|
|
obligations |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
768 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20112015 |
|
|
2,890 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1,504 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
4,394 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,516 million (2004: 4,902 million) of the defined benefit obligation for pensions
relates to unfunded benefit obligations while 9,009 million (2004: 7,771 million) relates
to funded benefit obligations.
341 million (2004: 322 million) of the defined benefit obligation for other
post-employment benefits relates to unfunded obligations while 695 million (2004: 586
million) relates to funded obligations.
Of the funded pension plans, total overfunding of individual plans amounts to 41 million
(2004: 114 million) while underfunding amounts to 966 million (671 million). Similarly,
other funded post-employment benefit obligations in individual funds are underfunded by 336
million (2004: 300 million).
The adjustments, as yet unrecognized in the income statement, represent the difference between
the defined benefit obligation after deducting the fair value
of plan assets and the
net liability recognized in the balance sheet. According to IAS 19 (amended 2004), they arise
mainly from unrecognized past service cost. Plan assets in excess of the obligation are reflected in other receivables, subject to the asset limitation specified in IAS 19. In
accordance with IAS 19 (amended 2004), the amounts reflected in the balance sheet will be
recognized in the income statement over the expected average remaining service period of
existing employees.
|
|
|
158 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
The actuarial gains and losses from defined benefit plans recognized in a separate statement of recognized income
and expense, and the deductions in connection with the asset limitation due to uncertainty of future benefits resulting from application
of IAS 19 (amended 2004), are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension obligations Germany |
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2003 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit obligation |
|
|
8,099 |
|
|
|
8,866 |
|
|
|
10,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets |
|
|
4,240 |
|
|
|
4,373 |
|
|
|
4,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status |
|
|
(3,859 |
) |
|
|
(4,493 |
) |
|
|
(5,657 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated actuarial gains (losses) relating to benefit obligation, at beginning of year |
|
|
(670 |
) |
|
|
(1,119 |
) |
|
|
(1,682 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial gains (losses) during the year relating to benefit obligation due to changes in actuarial parameters |
|
|
(610 |
) |
|
|
(575 |
) |
|
|
(1,122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial gains (losses) during the year relating to benefit obligation due to changes in empirical data |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes due to mergers, acquisitions and divestitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation differences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated actuarial gains (losses) relating to benefit obligation, at year end |
|
|
(1,119 |
) |
|
|
(1,682 |
) |
|
|
(2,842 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated actuarial gains (losses) relating to plan assets, at beginning of year |
|
|
(753 |
) |
|
|
(735 |
) |
|
|
(786 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial gains (losses) during the year relating to plan assets |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes due to mergers, acquisitions and divestitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation differences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated actuarial gains (losses) relating to plan assets, at year end |
|
|
(735 |
) |
|
|
(786 |
) |
|
|
(693 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset limitation due to uncertainty of obtaining future benefits, at beginning of year |
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes during the year due to asset limitation |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes due to mergers, acquisitions and divestitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation differences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset limitation due to uncertainty of obtaining future benefits, at year end |
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other post-employment benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other post-employment benefit |
|
|
|
Pension obligations other countries |
|
|
obligations other countries |
|
|
Pension obligations total |
|
|
obligations total |
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2003 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2003 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2003 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2003 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit obligation |
|
|
3,746 |
|
|
|
3,807 |
|
|
|
4,269 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
11,845 |
|
|
|
12,673 |
|
|
|
14,525 |
|
|
|
1,088 |
|
|
|
908 |
|
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets |
|
|
2,675 |
|
|
|
2,841 |
|
|
|
3,485 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
6,915 |
|
|
|
7,214 |
|
|
|
8,084 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status |
|
|
(1,071 |
) |
|
|
(966 |
) |
|
|
(784 |
) |
|
|
(623 |
) |
|
|
(438 |
) |
|
|
(519 |
) |
|
|
(4,930 |
) |
|
|
(5,459 |
) |
|
|
(6,441 |
) |
|
|
(825 |
) |
|
|
(622 |
) |
|
|
(677 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated actuarial gains (losses) relating to benefit obligation, at beginning of year |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(304 |
) |
|
|
(421 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
(259 |
) |
|
|
(768 |
) |
|
|
(1,423 |
) |
|
|
(2,103 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
(259 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial gains (losses) during the year relating to benefit obligation due to changes in actuarial parameters |
|
|
(249 |
) |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(265 |
) |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(859 |
) |
|
|
(736 |
) |
|
|
(1,387 |
) |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial gains (losses) during the year relating to benefit obligation due to changes in empirical data |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes due to mergers, acquisitions and divestitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation differences |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated actuarial gains (losses) relating to benefit obligation, at year end |
|
|
(304 |
) |
|
|
(421 |
) |
|
|
(692 |
) |
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
(259 |
) |
|
|
(259 |
) |
|
|
(1,423 |
) |
|
|
(2,103 |
) |
|
|
(3,534 |
) |
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
(259 |
) |
|
|
(259 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated actuarial gains (losses) relating to plan assets, at beginning of year |
|
|
(631 |
) |
|
|
(315 |
) |
|
|
(204 |
) |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(1,384 |
) |
|
|
(1,050 |
) |
|
|
(990 |
) |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial gains (losses) during the year relating to plan assets |
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes due to mergers, acquisitions and divestitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation differences |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated actuarial gains (losses) relating to plan assets, at year end |
|
|
(315 |
) |
|
|
(204 |
) |
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(1,050 |
) |
|
|
(990 |
) |
|
|
(818 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset limitation due to uncertainty of obtaining future benefits, at beginning of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
1,065 |
|
|
|
1,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes during the year due to asset limitation |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes due to mergers, acquisitions and divestitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation differences |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset limitation due to uncertainty of obtaining future benefits, at year end |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,065 |
|
|
|
1,067 |
|
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Germany, no actuarial gains/losses or deductions due to asset limitation have
yet been realized in relation to other post-employment benefit obligations.
|
|
|
160 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Provisions for pensions and other post-employment benefits changed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
scope of |
|
|
Currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
million |
|
Jan. 1, 2005 |
|
|
consolidation |
|
|
effects |
|
|
Allocations |
|
|
Utilization |
|
|
Reversal |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions for pensions and
other post-employment benefits |
|
|
6,219 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
1,849 |
|
|
|
(615 |
) |
|
|
(403 |
) |
|
|
7,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
29. Other provisions
These comprise:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which |
|
million |
|
Total |
|
|
current |
|
|
Total |
|
|
current |
|
|
|
|
Provisions for taxes |
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
|
Provisions for personnel commitments |
|
|
1,261 |
|
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
1,485 |
|
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
|
Provisions for environmental remediation |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
Provisions for restructuring |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
Provisions for trade-related commitments |
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous provisions |
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
1,042 |
|
|
|
936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,911 |
|
|
|
2,707 |
|
|
|
4,349 |
|
|
|
3,009 |
|
|
|
|
The expected disbursements out of the provisions recognized in the 2004 and 2005
balance sheets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Expected disbursements |
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2,707 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
374 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
63 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
43 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
2010 or later |
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected disbursements |
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
3,009 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
231 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
125 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
81 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
229 |
|
|
2011 or later |
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 161 |
Changes in provisions were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
scope of |
|
|
Currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan. 1, 2005 |
|
|
consolidation |
|
|
effects |
|
|
Allocations |
|
|
Utilization |
|
|
Reversal |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes |
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
(355 |
) |
|
|
(339 |
) |
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel commitments |
|
|
1,261 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
(681 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
1,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental remediation |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade-related commitments |
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
(898 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous |
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
829 |
|
|
|
(417 |
) |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
1,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,911 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
3,274 |
|
|
|
(2,505 |
) |
|
|
(604 |
) |
|
|
4,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provisions are partly offset by claims for refunds in the amount of 116 million,
which are recognized as receivables. These relate mainly to environmental measures and to
claims out of the provisions for legal risks. The miscellaneous provisions contain provisions
in the amount of 663 million (2004: 226 million) for significant legal risks. Further details of legal risks are given in Note [35].
Personnel commitments mainly include annual bonus payments, vacation entitlements, service
awards and other personnel costs. Also reflected here are the obligations under the
stock-based compensation programs.
29.1 Stock-based compensation
Stock-based compensation in the Bayer Group is granted primarily under standard programs and
also on an individual-agreement basis.
Individual agreements enable the company to link remuneration components to the stock price or
future stock price trends. Awards under such agreements may be contingent upon the attainment
of agreed targets, or they may be based solely on length of service.
Standard programs exist for different groups of employees. The program offered to members of
the Board of Management and other senior executives from 2000 through 2004 was essentially a
stock option program with variable stock-based awards. This program provides for cash
payments. Middle managers and other groups of employees were offered a stock incentive program
or a stock participation program, respectively.
A new stock-based compensation program for top management, known as Aspire, was introduced
in 2005. It comprises two variants which are described below. For other managers and
non-managerial employees, a different type of stock participation program was offered in 2005,
under which Bayer subsidizes employee purchases of shares in the company.
As with other remuneration systems involving cash settlement, awards to be made under the
stock-based programs are covered by provisions in the amount of the fair value of the
obligations currently existing toward the respective groups of employees. Changes in
provisions relating to all existing stock-based compensation programs are, or have been,
recognized in the income statement.
|
|
|
162 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
In the past, these programs were measured on the basis of intrinsic value. Starting in 2005,
measurement is based on fair value, and prior periods have therefore been restated
accordingly. The change affected provisions as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option |
|
|
Stock incentive |
|
|
Stock participation |
|
|
|
program |
|
|
program |
|
|
program |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic value as of December 31, 2004 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-time remeasurement effect |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value as of January 1, 2005 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below shows the change in provisions for the various programs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option |
|
|
Stock incentive |
|
|
Stock participation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
program |
|
|
program |
|
|
program |
|
|
Aspire I |
|
|
Aspire II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2005 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocations |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reversal |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses for stock-based compensation programs in 2005 were 57 million (2004: 8
million), including 34 million for the new Aspire programs introduced in 2005 and 2 million
in subsidies for the 2005 short-term stock participation program (2004: 4 million).
In 2005 provisions of 4 million were recorded in the financial statements at the fair value
of obligations entered into under individual stock-based compensation agreements. The
obligations were measured in the same way as those incurred for the standard programs.
The fair value of obligations under the standard stock-based compensation programs and
individual agreements has been calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation method using the
following key parameters:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
2.27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.92 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Volatility of Bayer stock |
|
|
38.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Volatility of the EURO STOXX 50SM |
|
|
19.55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Correlation between Bayer stock price
and the EURO STOXX 50SM |
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
The expected exercise period is three to five years.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 163 |
Long-term incentive program for members of the Board of Management and other senior
executives (Aspire I)
To participate in Aspire I, members of the Board of Management and other senior executives are
required to purchase a certain number of Bayer shares that is predetermined according to
specific guidelines and to retain them for the full term of the program.
A percentage of their annual base salary is defined as a target for variable payments
(Aspire target opportunity). Depending on the performance of Bayer stock, both in absolute
terms and relative to the EURO STOXX 50SM benchmark index, participants are granted
an award of between 0 and 200 percent of their individual target opportunity.
Participants may ask for their Aspire award to be paid out in cash immediately at the end of
the three-year performance period, or they may convert it into performance units. These can
then be redeemed within a two-year exercise period for a cash payment that depends on the
Bayer stock price on the exercise date.
Long-term
incentive program for middle management (Aspire II)
A variant of the Aspire program with the following modifications is also offered to middle
management:
|
No personal investment in Bayer shares is required. |
|
|
The amount of the award in relation to the employees personal Aspire target opportunity
is based entirely on the absolute performance of Bayer stock during the performance
period. |
|
|
The award varies between 0 and 150 percent of the Aspire target opportunity. |
This variant of the Aspire program is thus not linked to the EURO STOXX 50SM index.
Stock Participation Program (2005) for other managers and non-managerial employees
Under this program, Bayer offered employees the opportunity to purchase shares at a discount
as follows:
|
up to 30 Bayer shares at a discount of 6.75 per share |
|
|
additional Bayer
shares at a 15 percent discount up to a maximum total value of 2,500 |
Managers not eligible to participate in the Aspire program could purchase shares at a 15
percent discount up to a maximum value of 4,000.
The shares purchased under the 2005 program must be held in a special deposit account and may
not be sold before December 31, 2006. Employees acquired a total of 523,072 Bayer shares under
the 2005 Stock Participation Program.
|
|
|
164 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Stock-based
compensation programs 2000-2004
The stock-based compensation programs offered to the different employee groups in 2000 through
2004 were all similar in structure. Provisions for the obligations under these programs are
recorded in the balance sheet at fair value and recognized in the income statement.
Entitlement to awards under these programs depends on an initial investment in Bayer stock
being retained for their duration.
The table shows the programs applicable through December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option |
|
|
Stock incentive |
|
|
Stock participation |
|
|
|
program |
|
|
program |
|
|
program |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year of issue |
|
|
20002004 |
|
|
|
20002004 |
|
|
|
20002004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original term in years |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retention period / distribution date in years from issue date |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2/6/10 |
|
|
|
2/6/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference price |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance criteria |
|
Yes |
|
|
Yes |
|
|
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
Option Program (2000-2004)
A maximum personal investment in Bayer stock was defined for each Board of Management member
or other senior executive who wished to participate in the Stock Option Program.
Here, too, there is a three-year retention period followed by a two-year exercise period,
after which any option
rights not exercised expire. Eligibility to exercise option rights and the award to which the
holder is entitled depend on the absolute and relative performances of Bayer AG stock.
For the
tranches issued in 2000-2002, every participant received one option for every 20
shares placed in a special account (personal investment). Each option originally could reach a
maximum value of 200 shares during the term of the tranche, depending on the performance of
Bayer stock, both in absolute terms and relative to the benchmark
index, the EURO STOXX 50SM.
For the tranches issued in 2003 and 2004, participants received up to three options per share
of their personal investments. For each option, a cash payment equivalent to the market
price of one Bayer share and an outperformance premium are awarded at the exercise date
subject to the attainment of certain performance and outperformance targets, respectively.
The stock options issued under the 2001 and 2002 tranches can currently be exercised. However,
on the reporting date their intrinsic value was zero.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 165 |
Stock Incentive Program (2000-2004)
To take part in this program, each participant was required to deposit shares with a maximum
aggregate value of half his or her performance-related bonus for the preceding fiscal year.
The incentive award depends on the number of Bayer shares deposited at the launch of each
tranche and the overall performance of Bayer stock. The Stock Incentive Program differs from
the Stock Option Program in that participants may sell their shares during the term of the
program, although any shares sold do not count for the purpose of incentive awards on
subsequent distribution dates. The Stock Incentive Program runs for a ten-year period, during
which there are three incentive payment dates.
Incentive payments under the program are only made if Bayer stock has outperformed the Dow
Jones EURO STOXX 50SM index by the respective distribution dates. For every ten
Bayer shares originally placed in their deposit account and retained until the distribution
date, participants then receive payments equal to the values of two shares after two years,
four shares after six years and four shares after ten years.
Stock Participation Program (2000-2004)
Under the Stock Participation Program, only half as many shares are allocated per ten shares
deposited as under the Stock Incentive Program, but allocation does not depend on any
performance criteria.
29.2 Environmental protection
The Groups activities are subject to extensive laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in
which it does business and maintains properties. Compliance with environmental laws and
regulations may require Bayer to remove or mitigate the effects of the disposal or release of
chemical substances at various sites. Under some of these laws and regulations, a current or
previous owner or operator of property may be held liable for the costs of removal or
remediation of hazardous substances on, under, or in its property, without regard to whether
the owner or operator knew of, or caused the presence of the contaminants, and regardless of
whether the practices that resulted in the contamination were legal at the time they occurred.
As many of the production sites have an extended history of industrial use, it is impossible
to predict precisely what effect these laws and regulations will have on the Group in the
future.
As is typical for companies involved in the chemical and related industries, soil and
groundwater contamination has occurred in the past at some of the sites, and might occur or be
discovered at other sites. Group companies are subject to claims brought by United States
Federal or State regulatory agencies and other private entities and individuals regarding the
remediation of sites that they own, formerly owned or operated, where materials were produced
specifically for them by contract manufacturers or where waste from their operations was
treated, stored or disposed of.
In particular, a potential liability exists under the U.S. Federal Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, commonly known as Superfund, the U.S. Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act and related state laws for investigation and remediation costs
at a number of sites. At most of these sites, numerous companies, including Bayer, have been
notified that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, state governing body or private
individuals consider such companies to be potentially responsible parties under Superfund or
related laws. At other sites, Bayer is the sole responsible party. The proceedings relating to
these sites are in various stages. In most cases remediation measures have already been
initiated.
|
|
|
166 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Provisions for environmental remediation as of December 31, 2005 amounted to 279 million (2004:
249 million). The material components of the provisions for environmental remediation costs
primarily relate to land reclamation, rehabilitation of contaminated sites, recultivation of
landfills, and redevelopment and water protection measures. The provisions for environmental
remediation costs are recorded on a discounted basis where environmental assessments or
clean-ups are probable, the costs can be reasonably estimated and no future economic benefit
is expected to arise from these measures. The above amount of provisions represents
anticipated future remediation payments totaling 363 million (2004: 294 million), discounted
at risk-free average rates of between 3.0 percent and 7.0 percent. These discounted amounts
will be paid out over the period of remediation of the relevant sites, which is expected to be
20 years.
Further information on the inherent difficulties involved in accurately estimating
environmental obligations is provided in Note [5].
29.3 Restructuring charges
Restructuring charges of 162 million were incurred in 2005 for closures of facilities and
relocation of business activities, including 67 million in provisions that are expected to be
utilized as the respective restructuring measures are implemented. The total charges include
50 million in severance payments, a total 59 million in accelerated
amortization/depreciation and write-downs of intangible assets, property, plant and equipment,
and 53 million in other expenses. Most of the charges taken for severance payments and other
expenses in 2005 will lead to disbursements in 2006.
Provisions for restructuring still contained 9 million from the previous years allocation
for restructuring projects in the Pharmaceuticals Division, some of which relate to the
strategic alliance with Schering-Plough. This amount is mainly for severance payments and for
obligations under supply and service arrangements. Further, as a result of more recent
assessments of the market position of certain marketing licenses in the United States, the
useful life of the corresponding intangible assets has been reduced and inventories have been
written down, leading to additional expenses of 18 million.
In connection with the restructuring of the pharmaceuticals site in Wuppertal, Germany, a
former Lipobay facility was written down by 5 million in 2005. Further costs of 5 million
were incurred in addition. In 2004, expenses of 24 million were incurred for severance
payments in connection with the restructuring of the research center in Wuppertal, Germany.
The building use plan for the West Haven, Connecticut, site in the United States was reviewed
in the third quarter of 2005, and it was determined that Bayer has no further use for two of
the buildings because of site consolidation. An impairment test was carried out on these
buildings by comparing their residual carrying amounts to their fair value less costs to sell,
resulting in a write-down of 12 million.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 167 |
At the end of the third quarter of 2005 it was decided to relocate the headquarters of the
Diabetes Care Division in the United States from Elkhart, Indiana, to Tarrytown, New York. This relocation, which is
scheduled for completion by the end of 2006, affects about 160 employees. In this connection,
a write-down of 12 million was taken for the buildings in Elkhart used by this division, as no other use can
be found for them. Provisions of 7 million were recorded for severance payments to employees.
As a result of the reorganization of the Diabetes Care and Molecular Testing Systems
activities at the Berkeley, California, and Walpole, Massachusetts, sites in the United
States, additional expenses of 3 million were incurred for severance payments (2004: 7 million).
Following the decision made in the second quarter of 2005 to further reorganize the Bayer
CropScience business in France, provisions of 23 million were established for restructuring
charges, consisting largely of personnel expenses for social plans. The reorganization affects
virtually all functions at the relevant companies and includes the relocation of accounting
activities. The restructuring provisions as of December 31, 2005 totaled 33 million.
As part of the site consolidation at Bayer CropScience in the United States, the Environmental
Science and Seed Treatment activities at the Montvale, New Jersey, and Birmingham, Alabama,
sites are being transferred to Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, where the U.S.
subsidiary of Bayer CropScience is headquartered. A provision of 12 million was recorded for
this relocation. Of this amount, 7 million is for personnel expenses and most of the
remainder for infrastructure measures.
An additional 4 million provision was recorded for personnel and infrastructure measures and
the transfer of administrative functions as result of closing a CropScience site in Hauxton,
United Kingdom, and the relocation of manufacturing operations to other sites. Expenses of 13
million were recognized in this connection in 2004.
Following the decision to shut down the U.S. production site for TDI in New Martinsville, West
Virginia, a 9 million write-down was recognized on assets that can no longer be utilized. The
continuing reorganization of the MaterialScience business, which began in 2002, led to
additional expense of 4 million for severance payments. The other expenses include 33
million relating to a contractual purchase obligation. Current overcapacity has made it
unlikely that the agreement concerned will be utilized.
Further ongoing restructuring programs to improve the profitability of the subgroups and
integrate acquisitions gave rise to total expenses of 15 million, comprising 3 million in
severance payments, 1 million in write-downs and 11 million in other charges.
|
|
|
168 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Changes in provisions for restructuring were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance payments |
|
|
Other costs |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Status, January 1, 2005 |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilization |
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Status, December 31, 2005 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The other costs are mainly demolition expenses and other charges related to the
abandonment of production facilities.
30. Financial liabilities
Financial liabilities comprise the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
current |
|
|
Total |
|
|
current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debentures |
|
|
6,885 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
6,953 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities to banks |
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities under lease agreements |
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities from the issuance of promissory notes |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
861 |
|
|
|
861 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities from derivative financial instruments |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial liabilities |
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,191 |
|
|
|
2,166 |
|
|
|
8,952 |
|
|
|
1,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The maturities of financial liabilities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Maturing in |
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
3,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 or later |
|
|
2,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturing in |
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
1,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
2011 or later |
|
|
4,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities included 29 million (2004: 27 million) to non-consolidated
subsidiaries. As in the previous year, there were no financial liabilities to associates or
other affiliated companies.
U.S. dollar-denominated financial liabilities amounted to 1.3 billion (2004: 2.0 billion)
and account for 15.0 percent (2004: 21.8 percent) of total financial liabilities. No assets
of the Group are pledged against financial liabilities.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 169 |
Short-term borrowings (excluding the short-term portion of debentures) amounted to 1.4 billion
(2004: 1.8 billion) with a weighted average interest rate of 7.7 percent (2004: 7.9 percent). The
Bayer Groups financial liabilities are primarily unsecured and of equal priority.
Further information on the accounting for liabilities from derivative financial instruments
is given in Note [33].
Debentures include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
Effective rate |
|
Stated rate |
|
|
|
|
Nominal volume |
|
million |
|
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer AG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.515% |
|
5.375% |
|
|
Eurobonds 2002/2007 |
|
EUR 2,137 million |
|
|
3,018 |
|
|
|
2,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.075% |
|
6.000% |
|
|
Eurobonds 2002/2012 |
|
EUR 2,000 million |
|
|
2,129 |
|
|
|
2,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.155% |
|
5.000% |
|
|
Hybrid bonds 2005/2105 (2015) |
|
EUR 1,300 million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.500% |
|
3.500% |
|
|
Bonds (private placement) 2003/2005 |
|
EUR 15 million |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable |
|
Variable |
|
Bonds (private placement) 2003/2006 |
|
EUR 250 million |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.470% |
|
2.470% |
|
|
Bonds (private placement) 2004/2005 |
|
EUR 25 million |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable |
|
Variable |
|
Bonds (private placement) 2004/2006 |
|
EUR 50 million |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.502% |
|
3.490% |
|
|
Bonds (private placement) 2004/2008 |
|
EUR 20 million |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.160% |
|
0.160% |
|
|
Bonds (private placement) 2005/2006 |
|
JPY 5 billion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Capital Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable |
|
Variable |
|
Bonds (private placement) 2002/2005 |
|
EUR 65 million |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.180% |
|
7.125% |
|
|
Notes 1995/2015 |
|
USD 200 million |
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.670% |
|
6.650% |
|
|
Notes 1998/2028 |
|
USD 350 million |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.210% |
|
6.200% |
|
|
Bonds 1998/2028 (2008) |
|
USD 250 million |
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.043% |
|
3.750% |
|
|
Bonds (private placement) 2004/2009 |
|
EUR 460 million |
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Ltd., Japan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.750% |
|
3.750% |
|
|
Bonds 2000/2005 |
|
CHF 400 million |
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,885 |
|
|
|
6,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In April 2002 Bayer AG launched two Eurobond issues under its 8 billion European Medium
Term Note (EMTN) program. One of these issues, with an original nominal volume of 3 billion,
carries a 5.375% coupon and has a term of 5 years, maturing in 2007. Interest is payable
annually in arrears. The issue price was 99.402%. In July 2005 Bayer AG made a public tender
offer to the holders of these bonds to repurchase a maximum principal amount of 1 billion.
Bonds with a face value of 863 million were tendered and repurchased at a price of 104.957%
plus accumulated interest. The volume of the remaining 5.375% bonds outstanding is 2,137
million. The other Eurobond issue has a nominal volume of 2 billion and a term of 10 years,
so it matures in 2012. The bonds carry a 6% coupon. Again,
all interest is payable annually in arrears. The issue price was 99.45%.
|
|
|
170 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
In July 2005 Bayer AG issued a 100-year subordinated hybrid bond with an issue volume of 1.3
billion. This issue matures in 2105 and has a fixed coupon of 5% in the first ten years.
Thereafter, interest is calculated quarterly at a floating rate (3-month EURIBOR plus 280
basis points). After the first 10 years, Bayer AG has a quarterly option to redeem the bonds
at face value. The issue price was 98.812% and interest is paid in arrears. The proceeds of
this 100-year subordinated bond issue were mainly used to finance the repurchase of part of
the 5.375% bond issued by Bayer AG and due in 2007. The nature of this hybrid bond means that
rating agencies generally attribute it predominantly to stockholders equity when calculating
debt ratios and therefore subtract it from liabilities.
Bayer AG also issued bonds under its EMTN program in the form of private placements. A nominal
issue of 250 million was made in four tranches in 2003 maturing in 2006 with variable
interest rates. Interest is payable quarterly; the issue prices were 99.80%, 100.5412%,
100.67% and 102.1547%. A 15 million bond issued in 2003 and maturing in 2005 carries a fixed
coupon of 3.5% payable annually; the issue price was 100%. A 50 million bond issued in 2004
and maturing in 2006 carries a floating rate. Interest is payable quarterly and the issue
price was 99.94%. A 25 million bond issued in 2004 and maturing in 2005 has a fixed coupon
of 2.47% payable annually; issue price 100%. Further, a 20 million issue made in 2004 and
maturing in 2008 has a fixed coupon of 3.49% payable annually; the issue price was 99.947%.
Finally, a JPY 5 billion issue was made in 2005 maturing in 2006, with a fixed coupon of
0.16%, payable upon maturity.
In October 1995, Bayer Corporation issued usd 200 million of 7.125 % Notes to qualified
institutional buyers. The Notes have a term of 20 years and mature in 2015. Interest is paid
semi-annually in April and October.
In February 1998, Bayer Corporation issued USD 350 million of 6.65% notes to qualified
institutional buyers. The notes have a term of 30 years and mature in February 2028. Interest
is paid semi-annually in August and February. The notes will be redeemable, in whole or in
part, at the option of Bayer Corporation at any time, upon not less than 30 but not more than
60 days notice, at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the principal
amount or (ii) as determined by an independent investment banker.
In February 1998, Bayer Corporation issued USD 250 million of 6.20% Notes to qualified
institutional buyers. The bonds have combined call and put options giving the lead manager the
right to repurchase them, and the investors the right to cash them, after 10 years. At that
time the lead manager can reset the interest rate and remarket the bonds for a further period
of 20 years such that they would mature in 2028. If the lead manager does not exercise its
call option and the investors exercise their put option, the bonds will be redeemed in 2008.
Interest is paid semi-annually in August and February. The redemption provision on the 1998
6.65% Notes also applies for these bonds.
In January 2004 Bayer Corporation repurchased entirely USD 500 million of Money Market
Puttable Reset Securities issued in 2001 and all related options. This repurchase transaction
was funded by the issue of a bond with a nominal value of 460 million and a coupon of 3.75%.
The bond was swapped into USD.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 171 |
In April 2000, Bayer Ltd., Japan, issued CHF 400 million of 3.75% bonds in Switzerland. The
bonds had a term of 5 years and matured in April 2005. The bonds were swapped into Yen at a
variable interest rate.
At December 31, 2005, the Group had approximately 5.4 billion (2004: 5.3 billion) of total
lines of credit, of which 0.7 billion (2004: 0.5 billion) was used and 4.7 billion (2004:
4.8 billion) was unused and thus available for borrowing on an unsecured basis.
Liabilities under finance leases are recognized as financial liabilities if the leased assets
are capitalized under property, plant and equipment. They are stated at the present values of
the minimum future lease payments. Lease payments totaling 596 million (2004: 548 million),
including 128 million (2004: 129 million) in interest, are to be made to the respective lessors in future years.
The liabilities associated with finance leases mature as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
Lease |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
under |
|
Maturing in |
|
payments |
|
|
component |
|
|
finance leases |
|
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
2010 or later |
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
Lease |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
under |
|
Maturing in |
|
payments |
|
|
component |
|
|
finance leases |
|
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
2011 or later |
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
Lease payments under operating leases in 2005 amounted to 122 million (2004: 119 million).
31. Trade accounts payable
Trade accounts are payable mainly to third parties. An amount of 1,973 million (2004:
1,758 million) is due within one year. Of the total, 3 million (2004: 9 million) is payable
to non-consolidated subsidiaries, 26 million (2004: 38 million) to associates, 0 million
(2004: 0 million) to other affiliated companies and 1,945 million (2004: 1,712 million) to
other suppliers.
|
|
|
172 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
32. Miscellaneous liabilities
Miscellaneous liabilities are comprised as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
current |
|
|
Total |
|
|
current |
|
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest on liabilities |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
Payroll liabilities |
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
Liabilities for social expenses |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
License liabilities |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
Advance payments received |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
Liabilities from the acceptance of drafts |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Liabilities from commodity futures contracts |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Deferred income |
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
Long-term capital contributions of minority stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other miscellaneous liabilities |
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
936 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,121 |
|
|
|
1,918 |
|
|
|
2,532 |
|
|
|
2,016 |
|
|
The total amount includes 424 million (2004: 292 million) in accrued interest,
representing expenses attributable to the fiscal year but not due to be paid until after the
closing date.
Liabilities for social expenses include, in particular, social insurance contributions that
had not been paid by the closing date.
Deferred income as of December 31, 2005 includes 59 million (2004: 65 million) in grants and
subsidies received from government. The amount reversed and recognized in income was 12
million (2004: 17 million).
Under IAS 32, financial instruments are only classified as equity if there is no
conditional or unconditional contractual obligation to deliver cash or other financial assets
to the issuer. A shareholders right to put its shares back to the issuer at any time for a
consideration must be recognized as a liability of the issuer even if the legal form of the
shares gives the holder the right to a residual interest in the issuers assets. Where this is
the case, minority shareholdings in consolidated subsidiaries are therefore recognized as
liabilities in the Group statements. Long-term capital contributions of minority stockholders
primarily comprise LANXESSs 40 percent share
amounting to 39 million of the
capital of Bayer Industry Services GmbH & Co. OHG.
Further information on the accounting for receivables from derivative financial instruments
is given in Note [33].
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 173 |
Miscellaneous liabilities include 10 million (2004: 13 million) to non-consolidated
subsidiaries. As in the previous year, there were no liabilities to associates or other affiliated companies.
Liabilities of 313 million (2004: 388 million) were secured, including 7 million (2004: 7
million) by mortgages.
The other miscellaneous liabilities mainly comprise guarantees, commissions to customers, and
expense reimbursements.
33. Financial instruments
33.1 Management of financial and commodity price risks
As a global company, Bayer is exposed in the normal course of business to currency, interest
rate, credit and procurement market risks that could affect its financial position, results
of operations and cash flows.
It is company policy to use derivative financial instruments to minimize or eliminate the
risks associated with operating activities and the resulting financing requirements.
Derivative financial instruments are used almost exclusively to hedge realized or forecasted
transactions. The use of derivative financial instruments is subject to strict internal
controls based on centrally defined mechanisms and uniform guidelines. The derivatives used
are mainly over-the-counter instruments, particularly forward exchange contracts, option
contracts, interest rate swaps, cross-currency interest-rate swaps, commodity swaps and
commodity option contracts concluded with banks of first-class credit standing.
The various risk classes and risk management systems are outlined below:
Currency risk
Exposure to currency risk arises mainly when receivables, financial liabilities, liquid
funds or forecasted transactions are denominated in a currency other than the companys local
currency or will be denominated in such a currency in the planned course of business. The principal currency risks to which the
Bayer Group is exposed involve the U.S. dollar and the euro.
Currency risk is monitored and analyzed systematically and is managed centrally by the central
finance department. The scope of hedging is evaluated regularly and defined in a Directive.
Recorded foreign currency operating items and financial items are normally fully hedged.
The anticipated foreign currency exposure from forecasted transactions in the next twelve
months is hedged on a basis agreed between the Group Management Board, the central finance
department and the operating units. A significant proportion of contractual and foreseeable
currency risks are hedged through forward exchange contracts, currency options and currency
swaps.
|
|
|
174 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Interest rate risk
An interest rate risk the possibility that the value of a financial instrument (fair value
risk) or future cash flows from a financial instrument (cash flow risk) will change due to
movement in market interest rates applies mainly to assets and liabilities with maturities
of more than one year. Such long maturities are only of material significance in the case of
financial assets and liabilities.
Interest rate risk is analyzed centrally in the Bayer Group and managed by the central finance
department using a mix of fixed and variable interest rates defined by the management and
subject to regular review. Derivatives mainly interest rate swaps, cross-currency
interest-rate swaps and interest options are employed to preserve the target structure of
the portfolio.
Credit risk
In the Bayer Group credit risk arises from the possibility of asset impairment occurring
because counterparties cannot meet their obligations in transactions involving financial
instruments. Since the Bayer Group does not conclude master netting arrangements with its
customers, the total amounts recognized in assets represent the maximum exposure to credit
risk.
To minimize the credit risk, predefined exposure limits are observed and transactions are only
conducted with counterparties of first-class credit standing.
Procurement market risk
The Bayer Group operates in markets in which the prices of raw material commodities and
products often fluctuate. Such fluctuations can affect business operations. The procurement
departments of the subgroups are responsible for managing these price risks on the basis of
internal directives and centrally determined limits, which are subject to constant review.
Commodity swaps and commodity options, in particular, are employed to hedge changes in the
prices of crude oil, naphtha and benzene feedstocks and of natural gas.
These instruments are also used in the case of long-term, fixed-price supply contracts.
33.2 Primary financial instruments
Primary financial instruments are reflected in the balance sheet. In compliance with IAS 39
(Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement), asset instruments are classified as financial assets held for trading, held-to-maturity investments, loans and receivables or
available-for-sale financial assets. Held-to-maturity investments, and loans and
receivables, are recognized at amortized cost, while assets held for trading or available for
sale are stated at fair value. Changes in the fair value of available-for-sale securities are
recognized in stockholders equity, except in the case of impairment losses, which are
recognized in income.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 175 |
Primary financial instruments constituting liabilities are carried at amortized cost unless
they are designated for hedge accounting together with a derivative.
The amount of financial liabilities recognized in the balance sheet is 37 million (2004:
566 million) below their fair value, which is determined mainly by discounting future cash flows. The fair value of a primary financial instrument is the price at which it could be
exchanged in a current transaction between knowledgeable, willing parties in an active market.
The remaining receivables and liabilities and the liquid assets have such short terms that
there is no significant discrepancy between their fair values and carrying amounts.
33.3 Economic hedges and hedge accounting with derivative financial instruments
The Bayer Group uses derivative financial instruments to mitigate the risk of changes in
exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices. Many transactions constitute economic
hedges but do not qualify for hedge accounting under IAS 39. Changes in the fair value of
these derivative financial instruments are recognized directly in the income statement: fair
value changes on forward exchange contracts and currency options are reflected in exchange
gains and losses, those on interest-rate swaps and interest-rate options in interest income
and expense, and those on commodity futures and commodity options in other operating income
and expenses. The fair values of derivatives are determined from quoted market prices or using
recognized mathematical valuation methods.
Changes in the fair values of derivative financial instruments designated as fair value
hedges are recognized along with the underlying transaction.
Changes in the fair value of the effective portion of derivatives designated as cash flow
hedges are initially recognized not in the income statement, but in stockholders equity as
other comprehensive income. They are released to the income statement when the underlying
transaction is realized. The effects of hedging forecasted transactions denominated in foreign
currencies and the effects of commodity hedges are recognized in other operating income and
expense at the date of realization. If a derivative is sold or ceases to qualify for hedge
accounting, the amount reflected in other comprehensive income continues to be recognized in
this item until the forecasted transaction is realized. If the forecasted transaction is no
longer probable, the amount previously recognized in other comprehensive income is released to
the income statement.
The income and expense from the derivatives and the underlying transactions reflected in the
non-operating result are shown separately. Income and expense are not offset.
|
|
|
176 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
The fair value of hedged transactions at year end was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Positive fair |
|
|
Negative fair |
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Positive fair |
|
|
Negative fair |
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
value |
|
|
value |
|
|
amount |
|
|
value |
|
|
value |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency hedging of recorded transactions |
|
|
5,854 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
4,759 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward exchange contracts |
|
|
4,420 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
3,600 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which FV hedges |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which CF hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency options |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which FV hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which CF hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cross-currency interest-rate swaps |
|
|
1,414 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which FV hedges |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which CF hedges |
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency hedging of forecasted transactions |
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
942 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward exchange contracts |
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which FV hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which CF hedges |
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
809 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency options |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which FV hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which CF hedges |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate hedging of recorded transactions |
|
|
5,791 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
11,327 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
5,791 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
10,327 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which FV hedges |
|
|
4,104 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
5,533 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which CF hedges |
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which FV hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which CF hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity price hedging |
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward commodity contracts |
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which FV hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which CF hedges |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity option contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which FV hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which CF hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
12,926 |
|
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
17,493 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of which short-term derivative
financial instruments |
|
|
6,468 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
5,443 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for currency hedging |
|
|
5,864 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
4,872 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for interest rate hedging |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for commodity hedging |
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 177 |
Fair value hedges
Fair value hedges are used to eliminate the risk of changes in fair value, especially on fixed-interest borrowings, by obtaining a variable interest rate. Essentially these fair value
hedges comprise the 2 billion bond issued in 2002 and the 1.3 billion bond issued in 2005,
along with the bond issued in 2002, which was partially repurchased in 2005 and has a
remaining principal amount of 2.1 billion.
The ineffective portion of fair value hedges amounts to 0 million (2004: 6 million).
As in the previous year, there are no effects resulting from premature termination of
fair value hedges entered into on the basis of firm commitments.
Cash flow hedges
Fluctuations in future cash flows from forecasted foreign currency transactions are avoided
by means of cash flow hedges. Cash flow hedges are also used to partially limit the risk of
fluctuations in future cash flows resulting from price fluctuations on procurement markets.
They relate to forecasted foreign currency transactions or procurement transactions with total
notional volumes of 942 million and 465 million (2004: 479 million and 802 million),
respectively.
As of December 31, 2005, cash flow hedges totaling 7 million (2004: 27 million) were
recognized in other comprehensive income, while 3 million (2004: 1 million) were removed
from other comprehensive income and released to the income statement. The ineffective portion
of hedges totaling 10 million (2004: 0 million) are recognized in income.
An amount of 56 million will probably be reclassified from other comprehensive income to the
income statement within the next twelve months. All forecasted transactions are considered
highly probable.
34. Commitments and contingencies
Contingent liabilities as of December 31, 2005 amounted to 177 million. They result
entirely from liabilities assumed on behalf of third parties and comprise:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance and endorsement of bills |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantees |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other commitments |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The respective items refer to potential
future obligations where the occurrence of
the future events would create an obligation,
the existence of which is uncertain at the
balance sheet date. Group companies
frequently enter into certain obligations
related to business transactions. These
mainly comprise commitments undertaken by
subsidiaries for a
defined level of performance or the rendering of a specific service. Guarantees comprise
mainly bank guarantees where subsidiaries guarantee third parties liabilities to banks
resulting from contractual agreements with these subsidiaries. A liability to perform under
the guarantee arises if the debtor is in arrears with payments or is insolvent.
|
|
|
178 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Litigation and administrative proceedings are evaluated on a case-by-case basis considering
the available information, including that from legal counsel, to assess potential outcomes.
Where it is considered probable that a future obligation will result in an outflow of
resources, a provision is recorded in the amount of the present value of the expected cash
outflows if these are deemed to be reliably measurable. Litigation and other judicial
proceedings as a rule raise difficult and complex legal issues and are subject to many
uncertainties and complexities including, but not limited to, the facts and circumstances of
each particular case, issues regarding the jurisdiction in which each suit is brought and
differences in applicable law. Such proceedings therefore cannot be included in contingent
liabilities. Further details of legal risks are given in Note [35].
Under the German Transformation Act, Bayer AG and LANXESS AG are jointly and severally liable
for all obligations of Bayer AG that existed on January 28, 2005. To the extent that certain
obligations were not assigned to Bayer AG under the Spin-off and Acquisition Agreement, dated
September 22, 2004, between Bayer AG and LANXESS AG, Bayer AG ceases to be liable for such
obligations after a five-year period. The Master Agreement, entered into between the same
parties contemporaneously with the Spin-off and Acquisition Agreement, includes corresponding
indemnification obligations of Bayer AG and LANXESS AG. It also contains provisions dealing
with the apportionment of liabilities arising from product liability claims, environmental
claims and antitrust violations as between the contracting parties.
In addition to provisions, other liabilities and contingent liabilities, there are also other
financial commitments. Further financial commitments also exist, mainly under long-term
lease and rental agreements.
Minimum non-discounted future payments relating to operating leases total
452 million (2004: 441 million).
The respective payment obligations mature as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Maturing in |
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 or later |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturing in |
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
2011 or later |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial commitments resulting from orders already placed under purchase agreements
related to planned or ongoing capital expenditure projects total 294 million (2004: 142
million).
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 179 |
Of the respective payments, 292 million almost the entire amount is due in 2006.
In addition, the Group has entered into research agreements with a number of third parties
under which Bayer has agreed to fund various research projects or has assumed other
commitments based on the achievement of certain milestones or other specific conditions. The
total amount of such funding and other commitments is 562 million (2004: 847 million). At
December 31, 2005, the remaining payments expected to be made to these parties, assuming the
milestones or other conditions are met, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Maturing in |
|
Dec. 31, 2004 |
|
million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 or later |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturing in |
|
Dec. 31, 2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
2011 or later |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
|
|
35. Legal risks
As a global company with a diverse business portfolio, the Bayer Group is exposed to
numerous legal risks, particularly in the areas of product liability, competition and
antitrust law, patent disputes, tax assessments, and environmental matters. The outcome of any
current or future proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty. It is therefore possible
that legal or regulatory judgments could give rise to expenses that are not covered, or not
fully covered, by insurers compensation payments and could significantly affect our revenues
and earnings.
Legal proceedings currently considered to involve material risks are outlined below. The
litigation referred to does not necessarily represent an exhaustive list.
Lipobay/Baycol: As of January 13, 2006, the number of Lipobay/Baycol cases pending against
Bayer worldwide was approximately 6,000 (approximately 5,900 of them in the United States,
including several class actions). As of January 13, 2006, Bayer had settled 3,082
Lipobay/Baycol cases worldwide without acknowledging any liability and resulting in settlement
payments of approximately US$1.147 billion. Bayer will continue to offer fair compensation to
people who experienced serious side effects while taking Lipobay/Baycol on a voluntary basis
and without concession of liability. In the United States five cases have been tried to date
all of which were found in Bayers favor.
After more than four years of litigation we are currently aware of fewer than 50 pending cases
in the United States that in our opinion hold a potential for settlement, although we cannot
rule out the possibility that additional cases involving serious side effects from
Lipobay/Baycol may come to our attention. In addition, there could be further settlements of
cases outside of the United States.
|
|
|
180 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
In the fiscal years 2003 and 2004, Bayer recorded a total 347 million charge to the
operating result beyond the insurance coverage. A further 43 million charge to the operating
result was recorded in 2005, in respect of settlements already concluded or expected to be
concluded and anticipated defense costs.
A group of stockholders has filed a class-action lawsuit claiming damages against Bayer AG
and Bayer Corporation and two current or former managers. The suit alleges that Bayer violated
U.S. securities laws by making misleading statements, prior to the withdrawal of
Lipobay/Baycol from the market, about the products commercial prospects and, after its
withdrawal, about the related potential financial liability. In September 2005 the court
dismissed with prejudice the claims of non-U.S. purchasers of Bayer AG stock on non-U.S.
exchanges. Bayer believes it has meritorious defenses and will defend
itself vigorously.
PPA: Bayer is a defendant in numerous product liability lawsuits relating to
phenylpropanolamine (PPA), which was previously contained in a cough/cold product of the
company supplied in effervescent-tablet form. The first PPA lawsuits were filed after the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommended in the fall of 2000 that manufacturers
voluntarily cease marketing products containing this active ingredient. Plaintiffs are
alleging injuries related to the claimed ingestion of PPA.
As of January 13, 2006, 286 lawsuits were pending in U.S. federal and state courts against
Bayer, of which 136 name Bayer as the only manufacturing defendant. An additional 295 cases
are on appeal in federal court after the plaintiffs claims had been dismissed for failure to
comply with procedural requirements. No lawsuits have been filed outside the United States.
Three state cases have proceeded to trial. Two have resulted in defense verdicts for Bayer. In
one case, the plaintiff was awarded damages of US$400,000. This case was settled in July 2005
while on appeal.
As of January 13, 2006, Bayer had settled 247 cases resulting in payments of approximately
US$42 million, without acknowledging any liability. In the fiscal year 2005, Bayer recorded
expenses in the amount of 62 million for settlements already concluded or expected to be
concluded and expected defense costs.
Bayer will defend itself vigorously in all Lipobay/Baycol and PPA cases in which in our view
no potential for settlement exists or where an appropriate settlement cannot be achieved. Due
to the considerable uncertainty associated with these proceedings, it is currently not
possible to further estimate potential liability.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 181 |
Since the existing insurance coverage is exhausted (insurance coverage for PPA exists for up
to 5 percent of future costs), it is possible depending on the future progress of the
litigation that Bayer could face further payments that are not covered by the accounting
measures already taken. We will regularly review the possibility of further accounting
measures depending on the progress of the litigation.
Cipro®: 39 putative class action lawsuits, one individual lawsuit and one consumer
protection group lawsuit (which has been dismissed) against Bayer involving the medication
Cipro® have been filed since July 2000 in the United States. The plaintiffs are
suing Bayer and other companies also named as defendants, alleging that a settlement to end
patent litigation reached in 1997 between Bayer and Barr Laboratories, Inc. violated antitrust
regulations. The plaintiffs claim the alleged violation prevented the marketing of generic
ciprofloxacin as of 1997. In particular, they are seeking triple damages under U.S. law.
After the settlement with Barr the patent was the subject of a successful re-examination by
the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and of successful defenses in U.S. Federal Courts. It
has since expired.
All the actions pending in federal court were consolidated in federal district court in New
York in a multidistrict litigation (MDL) proceeding. On March 31, 2005, the court granted
Bayers motion for summary judgment and dismissed all of plaintiffs claims in the MDL
proceeding. The plaintiffs are appealing this decision. Further cases are pending before
various state courts. Bayer believes that it has meritorious defenses and intends to defend
these cases vigorously.
Rubber, polyester polyols, urethane:
Proceedings involving the former rubber-related lines of business
Investigations by the E.U. Commission and the U.S. and Canadian antitrust authorities for
alleged anticompetitive conduct involving certain products in the rubber field are pending.
In two cases Bayer AG has already reached agreements with the U.S. Department of Justice to
pay fines, amounting to US$66 million for antitrust violations relating to rubber chemicals
and US$4.7 million for those relating to acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber (NBR). In December
2005, the E.U. Commission imposed a fine of 58.9 million for antitrust violations in the
area of rubber chemicals. Further investigations by the named authorities are ongoing.
Numerous civil claims for damages including class actions are pending in the United States and
Canada against Bayer AG and certain of its subsidiaries as well as other companies. The
lawsuits involve rubber chemicals, EPDM, NBR and polychloroprene rubber (CR). Bayer has
reached agreements or agreements in principle to settle a number of these court actions. Some
of these agreements or agreements in principle remain subject to court approval. These
settlements do not resolve all of the pending civil litigation with respect to the
aforementioned products, nor do they preclude the bringing of additional claims.
|
|
|
182 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Proceedings involving polyester polyols, urethanes and urethane chemicals
Bayer Corporation has reached agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice to pay a fine of
US$33 million for antitrust violations in the United States relating to adipic-based polyester
polyols. A similar investigation is pending in Canada.
A number of civil claims for damages including class actions have been filed in the United
States against Bayer involving allegations of unlawful collusion on prices for certain
polyester polyols, urethanes and urethane chemicals product lines. Similar actions are pending
in Canada with respect to polyester polyols.
Proceedings involving polyether polyols and other precursors for urethane end-use products
Bayer has been named as a defendant in multiple putative class action lawsuits involving
allegations of price fixing of, inter alia, polyether polyols and certain other precursors
for urethane end-use products. Bayer has reached an agreement in principle, subject to court
approval, to settle all of the class action cases relating to claims from direct purchasers of
polyether polyols, MDI and TDI (and related systems). The foregoing settlements do not resolve
all of the pending civil litigation with respect to the aforementioned products, nor do they
preclude the bringing of additional claims. Bayer was served with a subpoena from the U.S.
Department of Justice seeking information relating to the manufacture and sale of these
products.
Impact of antitrust proceedings on Bayer
In consideration of the portion allocated to Lanxess, expenses in the amount of 336 million
were accrued in the course of 2005 which led to the establishment of a provision for the
previously described civil proceedings in the amount of 285 million as of Dec. 31, 2005.
Bayer created a provision of 80 million as of Dec. 31, 2005 in respect of the rubber-related
E.U. proceedings noted above, although a reliable estimate cannot be made as to the actual
amount of any expected additional fines.
These provisions taken may not be sufficient to cover the ultimate outcome of the
above-described matters. The amount of provisions established in 2005 for civil proceedings
was based on the expected payments under the settlement agreements described above. In the
case of proposed settlements in civil matters which have been asserted as class actions,
members of the putative classes have the right to opt out of the class, meaning that they
elect not to participate in the settlement. Plaintiffs that opt out are not bound by the terms
of the settlement and have the right to independently bring individual actions in their own
names to recover damages they allegedly suffered. We cannot predict the size or impact of the
opt-out groups on the settlement agreements.
Bayer will continue to pursue settlements that in its view are warranted. In cases where
settlement is not achievable, Bayer will continue to defend itself vigorously.
The financial risk associated with the proceedings described above beyond the amounts already
paid and the financial provisions already established is currently not quantifiable due to
the considerable uncertainty associated with these proceedings. Consequently, no provisions
other than those described above have been established. The Company expects that, in the
course of the regulatory proceedings and civil damages suits, additional charges will become
necessary.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 183 |
Patent and contractual disputes: Further risks arise from patent disputes in the United
States. Bayer is alleged to have infringed third-party patents relating to the blood
coagulation factor Kogenate®. In another dispute, Bayer has filed suit against
several companies, alleging patent infringement in connection with moxifloxacin. These
companies are defending the action, claiming, among other things, that the patents are invalid
and not enforceable.
In August 2005, Abbott filed suit against, among others, Bayer for alleged patent
infringement in connection with blood glucose monitors. The Japanese manufacturer of the
product Ascensia® Contour® system is contractually obligated to
indemnify Bayer against the potential liability.
Risks also exist in connection with court or out-of-court proceedings in which Bayer is
alleged to have violated contractual or pre-contractual obligations. For example, Aventis
Behring LLC alleges that Bayer violated contractual obligations relating to the supply of
Helixate® and is seeking damages.
Limagrain Genetics Corporation has filed suit against Bayer as legal successor to
Rhône-Poulenc for indemnity against liabilities to third parties arising from breach of
contract.
Bayer and Lyondell Group have asserted claims against each other in a binding arbitration
proceeding arising from a joint venture agreement in the manufacture of propylene oxide
generally relating to differences in contractual interpretation.
Bayer believes it has meritorious defenses in these patent and contractual disputes and will
defend itself vigorously.
Product liability and other litigation: Legal risks also arise from product liability lawsuits
other than those concerning Lipobay/Baycol and PPA. Numerous actions are pending against Bayer
seeking damages for plaintiffs resident outside of the United States who claim to have been
become infected with HIV or HCV (hepatitis C virus) through blood plasma products. Further
actions have been filed by U.S. residents who claim to have become infected with HCV. Bayer
is also a defendant in cases in which plaintiffs are asserting claims alleging damage to
health from the substance thimoseral, used especially in immunoglobulin therapies.
Bayer, together with other manufacturers, wholesalers and users is a defendant in the U.S.
state of Alabama in cases seeking damages, including one nationwide putative class action, for
personal injuries alleging health damages through exposure to diphenylmethane diisocyanate
(MDI) used in coal mines.
Bayer, like a number of other pharmaceutical companies in the United States, has several
lawsuits pending against it in which plaintiffs, including states, are seeking damages,
punitive damages and/or disgorgement of profits, alleging manipulation in the reporting of
wholesale prices and/or best prices.
A further risk may arise from asbestos litigation in the United States. In the majority of
these cases, the plaintiffs allege that Bayer and co-defendants employed third parties on
their sites in past decades without providing them with sufficient warnings or protection
against the known dangers of asbestos. One Bayer affiliate in the United States is the legal
successor to companies that sold asbestos products until 1976. Should liability be
established, Union Carbide has to completely indemnify Bayer.
|
|
|
184 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Bayer, among others, is named as a defendant in a putative nationwide class action pending in
federal court in North Carolina in the United States which alleges violations of antitrust
laws in the marketing of the pest control product Premise®.
Bayer believes it has meritorious defenses in these product liability and other proceedings
and will defend itself vigorously.
Notes to the Statements of Cash Flows
36. Net cash provided by operating activities
The cash flow statement starts from the operating result (EBIT). The gross cash flow for
2005 of 3.5 billion (2004 2.9 billion) is the cash surplus from operating activities before
any changes in working capital. The cash flows by segment and region are shown in the table
on page 84 ff. The net operating cash flow of 3.5 billion (2004: 2.3 billion) from
continuing operations takes account of changes in working capital and other non-cash items.
The 40 million net cash outflow from discontinued operations (2004: 0.2 billion inflow)
comprises cash inflows and outflows of the divested plasma business and Lanxess. The total
net operating cash flow amounted to 3.5 billion (2004: 2.5 billion).
37. Net cash used in investing activities
Additions to property, plant and equipment and intangible assets in 2005 resulted in a cash
outflow of 1.4 billion (2004: 1.3 billion). 2.2 billion (2004: 0.4 billion) was spent on
acquisitions, including about 1.9 billion for the consumer health business. Other
disbursements related mainly to the purchase of marketing rights under a license agreement in
the Bayer CropScience subgroup and a co-marketing and distribution agreement in the Bayer
HealthCare subgroup. Cash inflows related to investments totaled 1.2 billion (2004: 0.1
billion) and mainly comprised the scheduled repayment of loans following the spin-off of
LANXESS, the expiration of derivatives contracts used to hedge currency risks, and the sale of
the LANXESS convertible bond with a nominal value of 200 million). Sales of property, plant
and equipment led to a cash inflow of 0.4 billion (2004: 0.2 billion), while the inflow
from interest and dividend receipts, including marketable securities, totaled 0.3 billion
(2004: 0.5 billion). Further information on acquisitions and divestments can be found on page
115 ff. The net cash outflow for investing activities was 1.7 billion (2004: 0.8 billion).
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 185 |
38.
Net cash used in financing activities
In fiscal 2005 there was a net cash outflow of 1.9 billion (2004: 0.8 billion) from
financing activities. Net repayment of debt came to 0.7 billion (2004: 0.5 billion inflow for net borrowing). In the third quarter Bayer issued a 100-year subordinated hybrid bond
with an issue volume of 1.3 billion and a coupon of 5 percent. At the same time, the company repurchased part of the 5.375 percent Eurobond issue
due on April 10, 2007 through a public tender offer. The repurchased bonds had a face value of
860 million. Dividend payments for 2004 and interest payments totaled 1.2 billion (2004:
1.3 billion).
39. Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
Cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2005 amounted to 3.3 billion (2004: 3.6
billion). In accordance with IAS 7 (Cash Flow Statements), this item also includes securities
with original maturities of up to three months. The liquid assets of 3.5 billion (2004: 3.6
billion) shown in the balance sheet also include marketable securities and other instruments.
Liquid assets totaling 253 million have been deposited in escrow accounts to be used
exclusively for payments relating to antitrust fines and civil law settlements. For further
information on legal risks see Note [35].
Other information
40. Audit fees
The following fees for the services of the auditor of the consolidated financial
statements, PricewaterhouseCoopers Aktiengesellschaft Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, were
recognized as expenses in the 2005 fiscal year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
Financial statements auditing |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Audit-related services and other audit work |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax consultancy |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other services rendered to Bayer AG or subsidiaries |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
The fees for the auditing of financial statements mainly comprise those for the audits
of the consolidated financial statements of the Bayer Group and the financial statements of
Bayer AG and its German subsidiaries. Fees for audit-related services and other audit work
primarily relate to audits of the internal control system, including project audits in
connection with the implementation of new it systems, and auditor review of interim financial
statements.
|
|
|
186 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
41. Related parties
In the course of the operating business, materials, inventories and services are sourced
from a large number of business partners around the world. These include companies in which an
interest is held, and companies with which members of the Supervisory Board of Bayer AG are
associated. Transactions with these companies are carried out on an arms length basis.
Business with such companies was not material from the viewpoint of the Bayer Group. The Bayer
Group was not a party to any transaction of an unusual nature or structure that was material
to it or to companies or persons closely associated with it, nor does it intend to be party to
such transactions in the future.
The following transactions were undertaken with related parties included in the financial
statements of the Bayer Group at equity or amortized cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased services |
|
|
(365 |
) |
|
|
(378 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions with related parties mainly
comprised trade in goods and services. There
were also financial receivables from
related parties in 2005 in the amount of 39
million (2004: 44 million).
Further information on business transactions
with companies in which a significant
interest is held
and which are included in the consolidated financial statements at equity (associates) is
given in Note [21]. Transactions between Bayer AG and its consolidated subsidiaries and
between the consolidated subsidiaries are
eliminated in the income statement.
42.
Total remuneration of the Board of Management and the Supervisory Board, advances and loans
The remuneration of the Board of Management comprises an annual base salary, a fixed
supplement, and a variable bonus that is oriented to the achievement of defined EBITDA
targets for the Bayer Group. The total remuneration of members of the Board of Management in
2005 amounted to 7,064,828 (2004: 6,518,626), comprising 1,985,580 (2004: 1,884,929) in base salaries, 837,073 (2004:
810,573) in fixed supplements and 4,085,754 (2004: 3,665,880) in variable bonuses. Also
included in the total is an aggregate 156,421 (2004: 157,244) of remuneration in kind,
consisting mainly of amounts such as the value assigned for taxation purposes to the use of a
company car, and other payments. Other payments of 55,086 included in base salaries in the
previous year have been reclassified.
In addition, members of the Board of Management could participate in a cash-settlement-based
stock option program provided that they placed shares of their own in a special deposit
account. A total of 32,025 instruments with a fair value of 1,009,750 was allocated as of
December 31, 2004.
Since 2005, the members of the Board of Management have participated in the long-term
stock-based compensation program Aspire I (2005 tranche). Further details of this program are
given in Note [29.1].
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group 187 |
The
current entitlement for 2005 along with compensation arising from previous years
programs, parts of which are not yet earned is stated as a separate compensation component.
The changes in the value of previously existing entitlements under long-term stock-based
compensation programs are shown separately. They result from the upward trend in the price of
Bayer stock in 2005.
The remuneration of the individual members of the Board of Management for 2005 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remuneration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entitlement |
|
|
Change in value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
Variable |
|
|
in kind and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
acquired in |
|
|
of previous |
|
|
|
Base salary |
|
|
supplement |
|
|
bonus |
|
|
other payments |
|
|
Total |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
entitlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Klaus Kühn |
|
|
412,236 |
|
|
|
170,647 |
|
|
|
843,713 |
|
|
|
35,266 |
|
|
|
1,461,862 |
|
|
|
285,748 |
|
|
|
99,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Udo Oels |
|
|
412,236 |
|
|
|
170,647 |
|
|
|
843,713 |
|
|
|
41,942 |
|
|
|
1,468,538 |
|
|
|
285,748 |
|
|
|
99,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Richard Pott |
|
|
412,236 |
|
|
|
170,647 |
|
|
|
843,713 |
|
|
|
39,044 |
|
|
|
1,465,640 |
|
|
|
284,248 |
|
|
|
98,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Werner Wenning |
|
|
748,872 |
|
|
|
325,132 |
|
|
|
1,554,615 |
|
|
|
40,169 |
|
|
|
2,668,788 |
|
|
|
495,504 |
|
|
|
169,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,985,580 |
|
|
|
837,073 |
|
|
|
4,085,754 |
|
|
|
156,421 |
|
|
|
7,064,828 |
|
|
|
1,351,248 |
|
|
|
466,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension provisions for the members of the Board of Management, amounting to
32,218,996 (2004: 26,098,637) are reflected in the balance sheet of Bayer AG.
Beginning in 2001, we established a severance plan for the members of our Board of Management.
This plan provides for payments to Board members if their relationship with Bayer AG ends or
is terminated in certain circumstances. In 2004, we replaced the previous change-in-control
provision with a general severance indemnity clause comprising the following main elements:
If a member of the Group Management Board is not offered a new service contract upon
expiration of his existing service contract because he is not reappointed to the Board, or if
the member is removed from the Board in the absence of grounds for termination without notice,
he will receive a monthly bridging allowance amounting to 80 percent of his last monthly fixed salary for a maximum period of 60 months less the period for which the Board member was
released from his duties on full pay.
If, in the event of a change in control, the service contract is terminated within twelve
months thereafter by mutual consent, due to its expiration, or voluntarily by the Board
member in certain circumstances such as a change of strategy the Board member will receive
a monthly bridging allowance amounting to 80 percent of his last monthly fixed salary for a
period of 60 months, not counting the period for which he was released from his duties on full
pay.
|
|
|
188 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bayer Group
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
His pension entitlement is based on the final target pension level. If this has not already
been reached, his pension entitlement will be supplemented up to this level.
Emoluments to retired members of the Board of Management and their surviving dependents
amounted to 10,323,009 (2004: 9,917,575). Pension provisions for these individuals,
amounting to 115,972,457 (2004: 109,174,509) are reflected in the balance sheet of Bayer
AG.
The remuneration of the Supervisory Board amounted to 1,989,000 (2004: 1,173,000). Of this,
variable components accounted for 459,000 (2004: 153,000). In compliance with the Corporate
Governance Code, the remuneration of the individual members of the Supervisory Board is given
in the Corporate Governance section of this annual report.
There were no loans to members of the Board of Management or the Supervisory Board outstanding
as of December 31, 2005, nor any repayments of such loans during the year.
Leverkusen, February 21, 2006
Bayer Aktiengesellschaft
Board of Management
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Report of the
Supervisory Board 189 |
Dear stockholders:
During 2005 the Supervisory Board monitored the conduct of the companys business
and acted in an advisory capacity. We performed these functions on the basis of detailed
written and oral reports received from the Board of Management. In addition, the Chairman of
the Supervisory Board and the Chairman of the Board of Management maintained a regular
exchange of information and ideas. In this way the Supervisory Board was kept continuously
informed about the companys intended business strategy, corporate planning (including financial,
investment and human resources planning), the companys earnings performance, the
state of the business and the situation in the company and the Group as a whole.
The
documents relating to Board of Management decisions or actions which by law or under
the articles of
association or the rules of procedure required the approval of the Supervisory Board were
inspected by the Supervisory Board at its plenary meetings, sometimes after preparatory work
by its committees. In certain cases the Supervisory Board gave its approval on the basis of
documents circulated to its members. The meetings of the Supervisory Board were regularly
attended by the members of the Board of Management. The Supervisory Board was involved in
decisions of material importance to the company. We discussed at length the business trends
described in the reports from the Board of Management and the prospects for the development
of the Bayer Group as a whole, the individual organizational units and the principal affiliated companies in Germany and abroad. During 2005 there were four plenary meetings of the
Supervisory Board. On several further occasions, decisions relating to Group financing were
made after circulation of documents to the members. No member of the Supervisory Board
attended fewer than half of the meetings.
|
|
|
190 Report
of the Supervisory Board
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Principal topics discussed by the Supervisory Board
Among the main topics deliberated by the Supervisory Board in 2005 was the status of
research and development work at Bayer HealthCare and Bayer CropScience. On the basis of
presentations by both these companies, the Supervisory Board discussed aspects of relevance
to the enterprise as a whole, including the great significance of innovation for economic
success, the need for efficient resource deployment in view of rising costs, and the
importance of regularly appraising the various projects. A specific development project of
the Pharmaceuticals Division on which the Supervisory Board received a report was the Factor
Xa inhibitor for the treatment of thrombosis, which is in phase III clinical trials and is
the subject of a collaboration agreement with Johnson & Johnson relating to its further
development and marketing.
Another major topic again reported on by the Board of Management and discussed by the
Supervisory Board in 2005 was the status of various litigations, including court proceedings.
We paid special attention to the antitrust suits in the polymers field and to the litigation
concerning Lipobay/Baycol and products that previously contained phenylpropanolamine (PPA).
In 2005 the Supervisory Board also discussed projects aimed at enhancing the business
portfolio, including the purchase of co-marketing rights for the blood pressure treatment
telmisartan in numerous European countries. A subject of particularly thorough deliberation
was a major acquisition project of the Consumer Care Division, which was not realized because
higher offers were submitted by co-bidders.
At its meeting in December 2005 the Supervisory Board considered in detail the Board of
Managements operational, financial and balance sheet planning for the years 2006 through
2008.
Work of the committees
The Supervisory Boards Presidial Committee, which serves primarily as the mediation
committee pursuant to the German Codetermination Act, did not need to convene in 2005.
The Audit Committee met four times during the year, concerning itself in particular with the
companys and the Groups financial reporting, including the annual report to the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 20-F. Another area of focus was the Groups risk
management system. The Audit Committee set the budget for the services of the external
auditor and discussed with the auditor the main areas of the audit for the 2005 fiscal
year. It also discussed measures to implement various requirements of the U.S.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act including, in particular, the future submission of an assessment,
attested to by the auditor, regarding the internal controls over financial reporting
introduced in the Group pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
The Human Resources Committee convened on two occasions. It dealt with matters relating to
the remuneration of the Board of Management, the renewal of the contract of one of its
members, and the appointment of Dr. Wolfgang Plischke to the Board of Management effective
March 1, 2006.
Reports on the meetings of the Committees were presented at the plenary meetings.
Corporate governance
The Supervisory Board dealt with the ongoing development of corporate governance at Bayer,
taking into account the amendments made to the German Corporate Governance Code in June 2005.
In December 2005 the Board of Management and the Supervisory Board issued a new Declaration
of Conformity, which is also included in the Corporate Governance chapter of this Annual
Report.
Financial statements and audits
The consolidated financial statements of the Bayer Group were drawn up according to the
principles of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). These statements, as
well as the financial statements of Bayer AG and the management reports of the Bayer Group
and Bayer AG, have been examined by the auditor, Pricewaterhouse Coopers Aktiengesellschaft
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, Essen. The conduct of the audit is explained in the
Independent Auditors Report. The auditor finds that Bayer has complied with the
International Financial Reporting Standards and issues an unqualified opinion on the
consolidated financial statements of the Bayer Group. The financial statements and
management report of Bayer AG, the consolidated financial statements and management report
of the Bayer Group, and the audit reports were submitted to all members of the Supervisory
Board. They were discussed in detail by the Audit Committee and at a plenary meeting of the
Supervisory Board. The auditor submitted a report on both occasions and was present during
the discussions.
We examined the financial statements and management report of Bayer AG, the proposal for
distribution of the profit, and the consolidated financial statements and management
report of the Bayer Group. We found no objections, thus we concur with the result of the
audit. We have approved the financial statements of Bayer AG and the consolidated financial statements of the Bayer Group prepared by the Board of Management. The financial
statements of Bayer AG are thus confirmed. We are in agreement with the management reports
of Bayer AG and the Bayer Group and, in particular, with the assessment of the future
development of the enterprise. We also concur with the dividend policy and the decisions
concerning earnings retention by the company. We assent to the proposal for distribution of
the profit, which provides for payment of a dividend of 0.95 per share.
The Supervisory Board would like to thank the Board of Management and all employees for
their dedication and hard work in 2005.
Leverkusen, March 2006
For the Supervisory Board
/s/ MANFRED SCHNEIDER
Dr. Manfred
Schneider
Chairman
|
|
|
192 Bayer MaterialScience |
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
|
Bayer: Science For A Better Life 193 |
|
|
|
194 Bayer MaterialScience |
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Theres a good reason why professional soccer
players like Bernd Schneider trust products
from Bayer MaterialScience: modern synthetic
materials such as polyurethane-based textile
coatings and thermoplastic polyurethanes
(TPU) give both high-tech balls and soccer
shoes ideal properties and make them
virtually indestructible even under the
extreme conditions of competitive sports.
Throughout the world, sporting goods
manufacturers utilize the outstanding
properties of Bayer materials for example
TPU, polyurethane foam and coating raw
materials for inline skates, snowboards and
sports shoes, or Makrolon®
polycarbonate for visors and goggles.
Outside of sports, too, there is practically
no end to the potential applications for
Bayer MaterialScience products in the auto
industry, electrical engineering and
electronics, the construction sector,
household
appliances and leisure goods. In fact, the
companys high-tech materials are found in
nearly all areas of everyday life.
Each material plays its part in the
success story of Bayer MaterialScience. For
example, the highly durable
Makrolon® is the material of
choice for CDs and DVDs. To date more than 220 billion CDs have
been produced from this polycarbonate.
The marketing of tried-and-true products with
further enhanced properties is one key factor
in this companys success. Another is the development
of new materials and applications: Bayer
MaterialScience invests roughly 250 million
a year in research and development, with
products launched within the past five years
currently accounting for some 20 percent of
sales.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
|
Bayer: Science For A Better Life 195 |
|
|
|
196 Bayer News |
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Highlights 2005/2006
Bayer launches global Triple-i initiative
LEVERKUSEN Why does wet grass
clog the cutting mechanism of a
lawn mower? Would it help if the
blades and the inner housing were
coated with a moisture-repellent
material? Pioneering innovations
are often sparked by simple ideas
that benefit people and contribute
to the quality of life. Developing
such ideas is the aim of a new,
Group-wide innovation initiative
called Inspiration, Ideas,
Innovation or Triple-i for
short.
All Bayer employees worldwide
are invited to develop new
business ideas. Some 50 million
has already been earmarked for
2006 alone to implement innovation
projects resulting from this
initiative. Triple-i is intended
to further strengthen Bayers
innovative culture and capability
without, of course, neglecting
existing businesses or research
activities.
Anyone can think about whether there are important needs in the workplace, at home or
elsewhere for which satisfactory solutions do not yet exist, says Bayer AG Management Board
Chairman Werner Wenning, explaining the basis of the new initiative. Wenning points out that many
successful Bayer inventions have been sparked by unique ideas or driven by the personal commitment of individuals.
The company wants all employees throughout the Group to participate in the initiative and
submit their ideas. We have thousands of well-trained, creative experts in many areas, says
Wenning. We want Triple-i to arouse everyones enthusiasm and create a new culture of innovation
throughout the enterprise.
New production facility for fuel cell prototypes
GOSLAR At its site in
Selb, Germany, Bayer
MaterialScience subsidiary H.C.
Starck has commissioned a pilot
plant for the industrial
production of solid oxide fuel
cells (SOFCs ), which
generate heat as well as
electricity. SOFC-based energy
systems are capable of converting
a variety of fuels, such as
diesel, gasoline, hydrogen,
methane or biogas, into
electricity and heat by a process
that is efficient, environmentally
friendly and silent.
Further activities strengthen the pharmaceuticals business
LEVERKUSEN Bayer
HealthCare has added two further
activities to its pharmaceuticals
business. The company has
purchased the co-marketing rights
for the blood pressure treatment
telmisartan (tradenames:
Pritor® and
PritorPlus®) in
numerous European countries from
GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK). The
products had been co-marketed by
GSK in these countries under an
agreement with Boehringer
Ingelheim, generating sales of
approximately 65 million in 2005. Telmisartan
is a long-acting anti-hypertensive treatment
that provides powerful 24-hour blood pressure
control.
In addition, Bayer HealthCare
has entered into a collaboration
agreement with Nuvelo Inc. for the
development and commercialization
of the blood clot dissolver
alfimeprase, which is currently in
clinical phase III development.
The transactions significantly
strengthen Bayer HealthCares
cardiology and hematology
businesses, respectively.
New anticancer drug granted U.S. approval sooner than expected
LEVERKUSEN
In December 2005 sooner than expected the U.S.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted marketing authorization for
sorafenib (tradename: Nexavar®), which was developed jointly
by Bayer HealthCare and U.S. company Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the
treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (see cover picture). The oral
multi-kinase inhibitor is the first new treatment option for this type of
kidney cancer in more than a decade. Bayer HealthCare has also filed for
regulatory approval with the European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA),
where drugs can be granted marketing authorization for all countries in
the European Union through a centralized procedure. If the review is
favorable, Nexavar® could be on the market in the European
Union, too, by late 2006. Filings have also been completed in
Switzerland, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Mexico and other countries. The
substance is currently in phase III clinical trials for advanced liver
and skin cancer and, since February 2006, for non-small-cell lung cancer
(NSCLC).
Innovative fungicide to protect rice harvest in Japan
MONHEIM Bayer CropScience and Japanese-based Sumitomo Chemical
Co., Ltd. signed a co-development agreement in March 2005 for a new
compound to combat rice blast. The fungicide BYF1047 was identified by
scientists at Bayer CropScience. It is effective against the Pyricularia
fungus, which causes rice blast, one of the worlds most economically
significant diseases in rice. Bayer CropScience and Sumitomo Chemical are
jointly developing BYF1047 for use in Japan, where its launch is planned
for 2010/2011.
In addition, Bayer CropScience received the first
registrations for another fungicide in the United Kingdom and China: its
highly effective fungicide fluopicolide is intended for the control of
downy mildew diseases in vegetables, ornamentals and grapes, and late
blight in potatoes. The innovative compound is based on a novel mode of
action that enables long-lasting disease control.
Dr. Wolfgang Plischke appointed to Bayer AG Management Board
LEVERKUSEN The
Supervisory Board of Bayer AG
appointed Dr. Wolfgang Plischke,
previously a member of the Bayer
HealthCare Executive Committee and
Head of the Pharmaceuticals
Division, to the Board of
Management of Bayer AG, effective
March 1, 2006. Dr. Plischke is to
succeed Dr. Udo Oels, who will end
his active duty following the
Annual Stockholders Meeting on
April 28, 2006. Plischke was born
in Stuttgart, Germany, on
September 15, 1951. He studied
biology at Hohenheim University,
obtaining his doctorate in plant
physiology at the Institute for
Genetics. Plischke began his
career in 1980 with Bayer
subsidiary Miles Diagnostics. In
1988 he became pharmaceuticals
marketing manager for Germany, and
in 1991 he was named head of
international strategic marketing.
Four years later he was appointed
managing director of Bayer Yakuhin
Ltd. in Japan.
In 2000 Plischke took charge
of the Pharmaceuticals Business
Group in North America and became
a member of the Executive
Committee of Bayer Corporation. In
January 2002 he returned to
Germany to become General Manager
of the former Pharmaceuticals
Business Group of Bayer AG. In
July 2002, as Head of the
Pharmaceuticals Division, he
became a member of the Bayer
HealthCare Executive Committee.
|
|
|
198 Bayer News |
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Highlights 2005/2006
Promising antithrombosis drug in the pipeline
LEVERKUSEN Bayer HealthCare and Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical,
Inc., a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, announced in October 2005 that
they have concluded an agreement to jointly develop and market BAY
59-7939, a promising active substance for the prevention and treatment of
thrombosis. Under the terms of the agreement, Johnson & Johnson will
share the global development costs of the new drug and will make payments
totaling some US$290 million. Following the products launch, Johnson &
Johnson will pay royalties in the United States depending on the
achievement of sales thresholds. Bayer HealthCare holds the option of
marketing the product to U.S. hospitals and specialist physicians under a
co-promotion agreement, and retains exclusive rights to the product
outside the United States.
Phase III clinical trials with a once-daily 10 mg dose for the
prevention of venous thromboembolism after major orthopedic surgery
began in the fourth quarter of 2005. Bayer HealthCare currently plans to
file for approval for this indication by the end of 2007. Parallel phase
IIb dose-finding studies with twice- and once-daily dosing for venous
thromboembolism treatment and stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation
are currently ongoing. Submission of a marketing application for these
indications is anticipated for 2009.
Pioneering formulation technology for cereal herbicides
MONHEIM In 2005 Bayer CropScience launched ODesi®, a new
class of herbicide formulations, in Poland and Ukraine, the first
countries in which these products have been introduced.
ODesi® combines the advantages of solid and liquid
formulations and improves spreading and uptake on the plant leaves. This technology is
expected to become an important value driver for Bayers cereal
herbicide business in the coming years.
New manufacturing process for carbon nanotubes
LEVERKUSEN Researchers at
Bayer Technology Services and
Bayer MaterialScience have
succeeded in manufacturing
high-quality carbon nanotubes at
considerably lower cost than
before. By adding the new
multiwalled Baytubes®,
which have a mean diameter of only
20 nanometers, plastics can be
made so electrically conductive
that they can be painted without
any further pretreatment using
waterborne or powder coatings. The
microscopic carbon tubes can also
be used in the manufacture of
antistatic packaging materials for
electronic components or to shield
computer or cellphone housings
against electromagnetic
interference. Bayer Technology
Services is the Bayer Groups
competence center for process
technology.
Bayer and UNEP organize projects for young people
SAN FRANCISCO/LEVERKUSEN
More than 10,000 children from 60
countries took part in the 14th
International Childrens Painting
Competition on the Environment,
organized jointly by the United
Nations Environment Programme
(UNEP) and Bayer. The winners were
honored in June 2005 during World
Environment Day celebrations in
San Francisco. The pictures
vividly reflect the hopes and
fears of children regarding the
environment. Together with UNEP,
Bayer has implemented a dozen
youth environmental projects
worldwide since 2004. One of these
projects is the Young
Environmental Envoy Program, under
which 45 young people from 14 countries spent a week in
Germany in November 2005 learning about environmental protection at Bayer.
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
|
Bayer News 199 |
Bayer acquires Icon Genetics AG
LEVERKUSEN Bayer
Innovation GmbH (BIG), a
subsidiary of the Bayer Group
engaged in developing new fields
of business, acquired Icon
Genetics AG, a biotech company
headquartered in Munich, Germany,
at the beginning of 2006. Icon
Genetics discovers innovative
methods for developing and using
engineered plants. The acquisition
will strengthen Bayers activities
aimed at producing specific
pharmaceutical substances in
plants (plant-made
pharmaceuticals, or PMPs). This
technology uses the plants
natural protein generation process
to produce therapeutically
effective substances.
25 billion tablets produced in Bitterfeld
BITTERFELD A milestone
has been reached in Bitterfeld,
Germany: since production started
in 1995, Bayer has turned out 25
billion tablets of the pain
reliever Aspirin® and
the antacids Talcid®
and Alka-Seltzer® at
its site there. All packs of these
tablets found in stores in Europe,
and some of those sold in America
and Asia too, come from Bitterfeld
in the state of Saxony-Anhalt.
Bayer has invested 630 million
and created more than 700 jobs
here since 1992 as part of the
measures to rebuild the economy of
eastern Germany.
New production facility for polycarbonate blends in China
SHANGHAI At the end of June 2005, Bayer started up a new
compounding plant for polycarbonate blends in Caojing, China. This marks
the completion of the first project under the companys investment
program at the site, located near Shanghai. The compounding plant, with
an annual capacity of 40,000 tons, complements a polycarbonate production
facility of Bayer MaterialScience that is scheduled for completion in the
first half of 2006 and is planned to have an annual capacity of 200,000
tons by 2008. This facility will manufacture Bayers high-tech
Makrolon® plastic, which has applications ranging from
CDs and DVDs through car headlamp diffusers to transparent roofing. Bayer already has a significant, and growing, share
of the Chinese polycarbonate market. Also in Caojing, the company is
currently building the worlds largest production plant for the
polyurethane raw material MDI. Due on stream in 2008, the plant will have
a capacity of some 350,000 tons a year. Bayer plans to invest a total of
about US$1.8 billion in China through 2009.
Research to protect drinking water
LEVERKUSEN National Geographic Germany and Bayer have joined
forces to promote innovative research into the global protection of
drinking water. Through the National Geographic Exploration Fund, the
partners have committed a total of 250,000 to scientific projects
researching the exploitation, distribution and responsible use of
freshwater. Satisfying the growing demand for water is currently one of
the major global challenges.
|
|
|
200 Awards in 2005/2006 |
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Top Honors for Bayer
Bayer enjoys an excellent reputation worldwide and is internationally renowned for its
expertise as was confirmed again by numerous prizes presented to the company in 2005 and in
early 2006. These honors underscore our outstanding expertise and innovation potential in the core
areas of our business, says Bayer Management Board Chairman Werner Wenning. We are particularly
pleased whenever the knowledge and work of our employees are recognized in this way by independent
external experts in Germany and around the world. Some of the most important accolades are
described below.
Bayer received several prizes
for its best-known medicine
Aspirin®. The Innovation
Foundation, which recognizes
groundbreaking product innovations,
honored Aspirin® Effect
as an exemplary, particularly
innovative product, presenting
Bayer with the Columbus Egg award.
Furthermore, for the fifth time in
a row, Bayer HealthCares
Aspirin® brand received
the Pegasus Award in
acknowledgement of the high level
of consumer trust it enjoys. In
what is probably Europes biggest
consumer study to date, Readers
Digest determined the most
trustworthy brands in 14 European
countries. In the pain-reliever
category, Aspirin® is
the clear number one in Germany
with 44 percent of all votes. Bayer
also received an important accolade
at the beginning of 2006 for its
Aspirin® production: the
companys tablet plant in
Bitterfeld, Germany, was declared a
Selected Place 2006 by
Germany Land of Ideas, a joint
campaign mounted by the German
government and the business
community. The aim is to highlight
Germanys role as a center
of innovation as the country hosts the soccer World Cup.
Innovation is also the focus of the Hermes Award, which recognizes particularly novel
products. Bayer Technology Services received a prize at the Hanover Trade Fair for its multi-point
thermometer. The SpectroBay MultiTemp® uses fiberoptics to simultaneously measure
both substance concentrations and temperature profiles in industrial plants.
The company also garnered high praise for its excellent communication of the corporate
reorganization. Bayer AG received the German PR Prize 2005 in the category Communications
Management. This award, the highest such accolade bestowed in the German-speaking countries, is
presented by the German Public Relations Society (DPRG) and the F.A.Z. Institute for outstandingly
implemented PR planning, strategy-based communication processes and exemplary public relations. In
addition, Bayer and LANXESS received the Gold Award from PR-Report
magazine for the best PR campaign
of the year in recognition of the
public relations activities for the
LANXESS spin-off. Bayer also
received two other first-place
awards in the categories Internal
Communication and Change
Management and Financial
Communication and M&A
Communication.
Bayers corporate image film
entitled Bayer: Science For A
Better Life received the CINE
Special Jury Award in the category
Professional Non-Telecast
Division/Business Sales &
Promotion at the 46th Annual CINE
Golden Eagle Film and Video Awards
Gala.
The companys image campaign was
also honored in the Corporate
Media 2005 competition held by the
Medien-report Verlag publishing
house. The concept for Bayer:
Science For A Better Life
received the Master of
Excellence award the top prize
in its category. The campaigns
television commercial and the
online version of the Annual
Report each received the Award of
Master.
Bayers efforts in the areas
of sustainable development and
environmental protection have
received numerous accolades: at
the Climate Summit in Montreal,
Bayer received the Low Carbon
Leaders Award for its achievements
over the past ten years in the field of climate protection. The
company was rated Best in Class
by an international jury of
experts made up of representatives
from politics, non-governmental
organizations and industry, and
appointed by The Climate Group, a
climate protection organization.
Bayer was the only German company
to receive this rating, which is
given to the five top-ranked
companies. In the global climate
protection ranking, Bayer was
rated third among the 500 largest
companies.
Bayer has also been included in the
Climate Leadership Index, the first global stock index for climate
protection, in recognition of its
efforts to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions. In addition, Bayer stock
is consistently listed in other
sustainability indices, including
the Dow Jones Sustainability World
Index (DJSI World) and the European
Dow Jones STOXX Sustainability
Index (DJSI STOXX).
Bayer was presented with the Ron
Brown Award, a U.S. presidential
honor bestowed for social
commitment. The
company received this accolade for its Making Science Make Sense program, an employee
initiative launched more than ten years ago to advance scientific literacy among school students.
Two renowned financial publications honored Bayer AG for its hybrid bond issue in 2005, which
received high praise from experts: the magazine International Financing Review presented the
company with the IFR Award 2005 in the category Euro Investment-Grade Corporate Bond. The British
financial magazine EuroWeek honored Bayer with the illustrious Corporate Bond of the Year
designation.
Bayers investor relations activities received a number of awards. The annual BIRD Ranking for
the best investor relations in Germany, performed by German business publication Börse Online,
placed Bayer second in the Blue Chips category. The company was also among the top three in the
category Most Improved Investor Relations at the Continental Europe Awards 2005 sponsored by IR
Magazine. At the annual IR Best Practice Awards presented by Britains Investor Relations Society,
Bayer received the European Website Award 2005. As in the previous year, Bayer ranked ahead of all
the other DAX, MDAX and SDAX companies with its investor relations
website in the IR Benchmark
Analysis conducted by German it
communications consulting firm
NetFederation Interactive Media.
For the third consecutive year,
the website achieved the highest
overall position among 145
contenders in the IR Global
Rankings compiled by MZ Consult, a
U.S.-Brazilian financial
communications company. In the IR
Global Rankings 2006, Bayer took
first place ahead of other
German companies in the categories
Corporate Governance and
Disclosure Procedure.
Our companies in Argentina,
Australia, New Zealand and Belgium
were listed among the top
employers in those countries by
respected financial magazines and
human resources consultants. In
the United States, Bayer in 2005
was named one of the best
employers for working mothers for
the third time. And in Germany,
Vice Chancellor Franz Müntefering
awarded Bayer the Shaping Employment Companies Demonstrate
Responsibility award in the
category Prospects for Young
People in recognition of Bayers
exceptional commitment to
vocational training. The jury
singled out Bayer for the award
because of the special training
program operated by the Training
and Development Division of Bayer
Industry Services for young people
who lack basic educational qualifications.
|
|
|
202 Governance Bodies |
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Supervisory Board and Board of Management
Supervisory Board
Hermann Josef Strenger
Honorary Chairman, Leverkusen
Members of the Supervisory Board hold or held
offices as members of the supervisory board
or a comparable supervising body of the
corporations listed (as at December 31, 2005
or the date on which they ceased to be
members of the Supervisory Board of Bayer
AG):
Dr. Manfred Schneider
Chairman of the Supervisory
Board, Leverkusen
* December 21, 1938
Allianz AG
DaimlerChrysler AG
Linde AG (Chairman)
Metro AG
RWE AG
TUI AG
Erhard Gipperich
(until January 31, 2006)
Vice Chairman of the Supervisory Board;
Chairman of the Bayer Group Works Council,
Leverkusen
* April 30, 1942
Baywoge GmbH
Dr. Paul Achleitner
Member of the Board of Management
of Allianz AG, Munich
* September 28, 1956
Allianz Global Investors AG
Allianz Immobilien GmbH
MAN AG (until June 18, 2005)
RWE AG
Dr. Josef Ackermann
Chairman of the Board of Managing Directors
(effective February 1, 2006) and Chairman
of the Group Executive Committee of
Deutsche Bank AG, Frankfurt am Main
* February 7, 1948
Deutsche Lufthansa AG
Linde AG
Siemens AG
Andreas Becker
(effective April 29, 2005)
Chairman of the Works Council
of H.C. Starck, Laufenburg
* March 1, 1959
H.C. Starck GmbH
Karl-Josef Ellrich
Chairman of the Works Council of Bayer AG,
Dormagen
(Chairman of the Bayer Group Works Council
effective February 10, 2006), Leverkusen
* October 5, 1949
Bayer CropScience AG
Dr. Thomas Fischer
(effective October 1, 2005)
Graduate Engineer, Dormagen
* August 27, 1955
Bayer MaterialScience AG
Thomas Hellmuth
Agricultural Engineer, Langenfeld
* May 29, 1956
Prof. Dr. Ing. e. h. Hans-Olaf Henkel
Honorary Professor at the University
of Mannheim, Berlin
* March 14, 1940
Continental AG
DaimlerChrysler Aerospace AG
SMS GmbH
Brambles Industries
Orange SA
Ringier AG
Gregor Jüsten
(effective February 1, 2006)
Member of the Bayer Works Council, Leverkusen
* December 13, 1948
Dr. rer. pol. Dipl.-Kfm. Klaus Kleinfeld
(effective April 29, 2005)
President and Chief Executive
Officer of Siemens AG, Munich
* November 6, 1957
Alcoa Inc.
Citigroup Inc. (effective July 18, 2005)
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
|
Governance Bodies 203 |
Dr. h. c. Martin Kohlhaussen
Chairman of the Supervisory Board of
Commerzbank AG, Frankfurt am Main
* November 6, 1935
Heraeus Holding GmbH
Hochtief AG (Chairman)
Intermediate Capital Group
(until June 2005)
National Pensions Reserve Fund
(until April 2005)
Schering AG
ThyssenKrupp AG
Verlagsgruppe Georg von Holtzbrinck GmbH
John Christian Kornblum
Chairman of Lazard & Co. GmbH, Berlin
* February 6, 1943
Motorola Inc.
ThyssenKrupp Technologies AG
Petra Kronen
Chairwoman of the Works Council
of Bayer AG, Uerdingen
* August 22, 1964
Bayer MaterialScience AG
Dr. Heinrich von Pierer
(until April 29, 2005)
Chairman of the Supervisory Board
of Siemens AG, Munich
* January 26, 1941
Deutsche Bank AG
(effective May 18, 2005)
Hochtief AG
Münchener Rückversicherungs-
Gesellschaft AG
ThyssenKrupp AG
(effective January 21, 2005)
Volkswagen AG
Wolfgang Schenk
(until September 30, 2005)
Graduate Engineer, Leverkusen
* September 24, 1953
Hubertus Schmoldt
Chairman of the German Mine,
Chemical and Power Workers Union, Hannover
* January 14, 1945
BHW AG
Deutsche BP AG
DOW Olefinverbund GmbH
E.ON AG
RAG AG
RAG Coal International
Dieter Schulte
Former Chairman of the German
Unions Federation, Duisburg
* January 13, 1940
Dr.-Ing. Ekkehard D. Schulz
(effective April 29, 2005)
Chairman of the Executive Board of
ThyssenKrupp AG, Düsseldorf
* July 24, 1941
AXA Konzern AG
Commerzbank AG
Deutsche Bahn AG
MAN AG (Chairman effective June 3, 2005)
RAG AG (Vice Chairman)
TUI AG
ThyssenKrupp Automotive AG
Thyssenkrupp Elevator AG
(Chairman effective October 26, 2005)
Thyssen Services AG
ThyssenKrupp Steel Beteiligungen AG
(until December 9, 2005)
Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Ing. e.h. Jürgen Weber
Chairman of the Supervisory Board of
Deutsche Lufthansa AG,
Frankfurt am Main
* October 17, 1941
Allianz Lebensversicherungs-AG
Deutsche Bank AG
Deutsche Post AG
Thomas Cook AG
(Chairman until October 31, 2005)
Voith AG
Loyalty Partner GmbH (Chairman)
Tetra Laval Group
|
|
|
204 Governance Bodies |
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Committees of the Supervisory Board of Bayer AG as at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
Presidial Committee/Mediation Committee
|
|
Schneider (Chairman), Achleitner, Gipperich, Schmoldt |
Audit Committee
|
|
Kohlhaussen (Chairman), Fischer, Henkel, Schneider, Wendlandt, de Win |
Human Resources Committee
|
|
Schneider (Chairman), Ellrich, Kohlhaussen, Kronen |
Siegfried Wendlandt
North Rhine District Secretary of the German
Mine, Chemical and Power Workers Union,
Düsseldorf
* July 27, 1947
Baywoge GmbH
HT Troplast AG
Rütgers AG (until June 2005)
Reinhard Wendt
(until April 29, 2005)
Chairman of the Works Council of
Wolff Walsrode AG, Walsrode
* March 6, 1945
Wolff Walsrode AG
(until April 30, 2005)
Thomas de Win
Vice Chairman of the Supervisory Board
(effective March 2, 2006);
Chairman of the Bayer Central Works Council,
Leverkusen
* November 21, 1958
Bayer MaterialScience AG
(effective July 19, 2005)
Prof. Dr. Dr. h. c.
Ernst-Ludwig Winnacker
President of the German Research Association
(DFG), Bonn
* July 26, 1941
KWS Saat AG
Medigene AG (Chairman)
Wacker Chemie AG
(effective September 26, 2005)
Dr. Hermann Wunderlich
(until April 29, 2005)
Former Vice Chairman of the companys Board
of Management, Odenthal
* April 29, 1932
Board of
Management
Members of the Board of Management hold
or held offices as members of the
supervisory board or a comparable supervising
body of the corporations listed (as at
December 31, 2005):
Werner Wenning
Chairman of the Board of
Management
* October 21, 1946
Gerling-Konzern Versicherungs-Beteiligungs AG
Henkel KGaA
Klaus Kühn
* February 11, 1952
Bayer CropScience AG (Chairman)
Bayer Business Services GmbH (Chairman)
Dr. Wolfgang Plischke
(effective March 1, 2006)
* September 15, 1951
Dr. Udo Oels
* January 2, 1944
Bayer Chemicals AG
(until January 20, 2005)
Bayer Industry Services Geschäftsführungs-
GmbH (Chairman)
Bayer Technology Services GmbH (Chairman)
ThyssenKrupp Services AG
Dr. Richard Pott
* May 11, 1953
Bayer HealthCare AG (Chairman)
Bayer MaterialScience AG
(Chairman)
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005
|
|
Organization Chart 205 |
Organization Chart
as at March 1, 2006
Bayer AG (holding company)
Group Management Board
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Werner Wenning
|
|
Richard Pott*
|
|
Klaus Kühn
|
|
Udo Oels |
Chairman
|
|
Strategy & Human Resources
|
|
Finance
|
|
Wolfgang Plischke** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Innovation, Technology
& Environment |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Center |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Office
|
|
J. Krell |
|
Communications
|
|
H. Springer |
|
Investor Relations
|
|
A. Rosar |
|
Corporate Auditing
|
|
R. Meyer |
|
Corporate Human Resources & Organization
|
|
J. Peters |
|
Finance
|
|
J. Dietsch |
|
Corporate Development
|
|
M. Mangold |
|
Law & Patents, Insurance
|
|
R. Hartwig |
|
Governmental & Product Affairs
|
|
W. Grosse Entrup |
|
Group Accounting & Controlling
|
|
U. Hauck |
|
Regional Coordination
|
|
F.-J. Berners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Areas
Bayer HealthCare
|
|
Bayer CropScience
|
|
Bayer MaterialScience
|
|
Service Areas
Bayer Business Services
|
A.
J. Higgins (photo)
Chairman
P. Nicklin
Animal Health
G. Balkema
Consumer Care
T. Bihl
Diagnostics
S. E. Peterson
Diabetes Care
G. Riemann
Pharmaceuticals
W. Baumann*
Central Administration &
Organization/Business
Development & Licensing
H. Klusik
Product Supply
|
|
F. Berschauer (photo)
Chairman
D. Suwelack
Business Planning &
Administration
R. Scheitza*
Portfolio and Supply
Chain Management
B. Garthoff
R&D; Cooperations/
Licensing; QHSE
W. Welter
Industrial Operations
J. du Puy
Region Europe & TAMECIS
E. Zirakparvar
Region Americas
B. Naaf
Region Asia Pacific
P. Housset
Environmental Science
L. van der Broek
BioScience
|
|
H. Noerenberg (photo)
Chairman
T. Van Osselaer
Production & Technology
I. Paterson
Marketing & Innovation
G. Plumpe*
Administration
|
|
A. Resch (photo)
Chairman
H. Läpple*
IT Community,
Human Resources
Bayer Technology Services
A. Noack
Managing Director
Bayer Industry Services
J. Hinz (photo)
Chairman
H. Bahnmüller*
B. Blankemeyer-Menge
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Labor Director |
|
** |
|
Wolfgang Plischke is the successor to Udo Oels,
who will end his active duty after the Annual
Stockholders Meeting on April 28, 2006. Wolfgang
Plischke will assume Udo Oels current duties on
that date. |
|
|
|
206 Group Leadership Circle |
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Group Leadership Circle
as of March 1, 2006
The Group Leadership Circle consists of managers in the holding company, subgroups and
service companies whose functions are particularly important for the Bayer Group as a
whole.
A
Abreu, Claudio
Akers, Joseph
Alexander, Ian
Allen, Christopher
Amling, Andreas
Angerbauer, Rolf
Applegate, Jacqueline
Arnold, Markus
Asboth, Christian
B
Babe, Gregory
Bachlechner, Guenter
Bahnmüller, Heinz
Balkema, Gary
Baumann, Werner
Bechem, Martin
Beck, Klaus
Beier, Andreas
Belil Creixell, Francisco
Benecke, Lars
Berners, Franz-Josef
Bernhardt, Michael
Berry, Paul
Berschauer, Friedrich
Bertram, Frank
Bey, Alexander
Bieber, Wolfgang
Bielfeldt, Tim
Bier, Bernd-Peter
Bihl, Anthony
Bischof, Eric
Bostian, Arlin
Boyne, John V.
Braunleder, Georg
Broué, Jean
Bruhn, Burghardt
Brüll, Ludger
Brumund, Rudolf
Buckner, William
Burck, Alexander
Burgess, Joyce
Burmeister, Armin
Busch, Andreas
C
Cardinal von Widdern, Lutz
Carmichael, Neil
Carpenter, Kim
Catino, Joseph
Chenet, Thierry
Cherny, Margaret
Chiassarini, Mauro
Clarke, Christopher Edwin
Coppens, Ernst
Courth, Lambert
D
Dahmer, Jürgen
Dawkins, Martin Scott
De Cleyn, Rene
De Jonge, Maarten
De Luzuriaga, Luis
Deall, Michael
Decker-Conradi, Joerg
Delong, James
Dennehy, Paul
Dietrich, Frank
Dietsch, Johannes
Dini, Alain
Doerholt, Hermann-Josef
Döllinger, Lothar
Donahoe, Steve
Dosch, Rainer
Du Puy, Jacques
Dumont, Philippe
Düppen, Peter
E
Eiki, Norikazu
Eizenhöfer, Thomas
Engels, Hans-Wilhelm
Evans, Christopher
F
Fasel, Hans-Joachim
Fenu, Giovanni
Fey, Claus
Fieseler, Norbert
Firl, Rolf-Reiner
Fischer, Meredith
Flechtner, Helmut
Fournel, Michael
Freytag, Michael
Fritz, Reinhard
Funk, Rolf
G
Garnier, Franck
Garthoff, Bernward
Gasche, Hans-Erich
Gauthier, Philippe
Gerlach, Martin
Gerlich, Stephan
Geyer, Edgar
Gille, Gerhard
Graney, Robert
Gray, John
Grosse Entrup, Wolfgang
Gruber, Friedrich
Grunert, Frank
Gruss, Martin
Günther, Andreas
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
|
Group Leadership Circle 207 |
H
Hansen, Ralf
Hartwig, Roland
Hauck, Ulrich
Haug, Matthias
Haug, Michael
Hayes, Timothy
Heiden, Paul-Gerd
Heider, Wilfried
Held, Christian
Herzog, Dieter
Heumüller, Heinz
Higgins, Arthur
Hilken, Günter
Hinz, Jürgen
Hoever, Franz-Peter
Höhl, Hans-Walter
Hoppe, Axel
Hotop, Reiner
Housset, Pascal
Houston, John
Howard, Samuel Jason
Hummel, Don
Hussels, Hans-Günter
I
Inkmann-Koch, Anette
J
Jahn, Alexander
Jelich, Klaus
Jesse, Ralf-Ruediger
Johnson, Michael
Juhnke, Andreas
Jung, Ernst-Norbert
Jungblut, Wolfgang
K
Kaiser, Ralf
Kaul, Raj
Klausener, Alexander
Klebert, Ulrich
Klusik, Hartmut
Knapp, Frank
Kneen, Geoffrey
Knors, Armin
Koenig, Michael
Koersvelt, Adri
Köhler, Jürgen
Kolpon, Jay
Köplin, Wilfried
Kopp, Wilfried
Krauskopf, Birgit
Krell, Jörg
Kreuzburg, Christa
Kühling, Steffen
Kühn, Klaus
Kuschnerus, Norbert
L
Läpple, Horstfried
Lauff, Peter
Leidemann, Burkhard
Leidinger, Walter
Leroux, Bernard Marc Robert
Leucker, Hermann
Londershausen, Michael
Louvel, Erik
Löwer, Hartmut
Lowinski, Jean-Luc
Lukas, Frank
Lykos, George
M
MacCleary, Gerald
Mackintosh, Bruce
Malik, Kemal
Mangold, Matthias
Marchand, Gerhart
Marchand, Tobias
Mathews, Michael
Maul, Jürgen
McCahon, Peter
McCullough, Dennis
Meier, Lothar
Meyer, Rainer
Miebach, Wolfgang
Milon, Jean-Philippe
Mirgel, Volker
Möller, Jörg
Molnar, Attila
Morgan, David
Moritz, Matthias
Mothes, Helmut
Müller, Michael
Müller, Peter
Murek, Udo
N
Naaf, Bernd
Nagy, Paul
Nehoda, Vera
Nellshen, Stefan
Nestler, Andrew
Neuschwander, Marc
Nicklin, Peter
Noack, Achim
Noerenberg, Hagen
Nosenzo, John
O
Odenthal, Marc
Oehlschläger, Gabriele
Oehlschläger, Wilhelm
Oelrich, Stefan
Oels, Udo
Ohle, Jörg
Ohm, Christian
Ohst, Holger
Okrongly, David
Ott, Juergen
P
Parotelli, Roberto
Pascoletti, Karl-Heinz
Paterson, Ian
Payne, Patrick
Perne, Rainer
Peters, Jan
Peterson-Buengeler, Sandra
Phillips, Barry Allen
Pickel, Markus
|
|
|
208 Group Leadership Circle |
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Pilgram, Frank
Placke, Franz-Josef
Plischke, Wolfgang
Plumpe, Gottfried
Portoff, Michael
Pott, Richard
Prenzel, Jürgen
Preuss, Rainer
Pucci, Paolo
R
Raab, Jürgen
Rahenbrock, Udo
Ramesh, Mahalingam
Reichardt, Marc
Reichert, Karlheinz
Reinert, Thomas
Resch, Andreas
Rettig, Rainer
Riemann, Gunnar
Rittgen, Frank
Rosar, Alexander
Rothe, Hans-Joachim
Rövekamp, Frank
Rübsamen-Waigmann, Helga
Ryan, Mark
S
Saez, Antonio
Salge, Andreas
Schade, Michael
Schaefer, Michael
Schäfer, Klaus
Scheitza, Rüdiger
Schenk, Wolfgang
Schepers, Walter
Scherf, Willy
Schlegel, Günter
Schlieper, Henner
Schmeer, Hubert
Schmeer, Norbert
Schmelzer, Peter
Schmidt, Paul
Schmidt-Park, Olaf
Schmitz, Jörg-Rainer
Schmuck, Richard
Schneider, Joachim
Schneider, Reiner
Schorr, Rainer
Schramm, Helmut
Schuster, Matthias
Schwarz, Rainer
Seaton, R. Christopher
Sick-Sonntag, Ralf
Sieler, Miguel-Heriberto
Simcoe, Dean
Sjut, Volkert
Soland, Kurt
Sommer, Klaus
Spagnol, Tracy
Spinks, Ian
Springer, Heiner
Steenblock, Roland
Stegmüller, Roland
Steiling, Lothar
Stein, Ulrich
Steinhilber, Bernd
Stillings, Herbert
Stracke, Hubert
Struck, Werner
Stübler, Hermann
Sturm, Klaus
Suwelack, Dirk
T
Terhorst, Frank
Tiemann, Volker
Trebels, Wolfgang
V
Van der Broek, Lykele
Van der Merwe, Richard-Ewald
Van der Stouwe, Claus
Van Lengerich, Hartmut
Van Lookeren Campagne, Michiel
Van Meirvenne, Dirk
Van Nooy, Michael
Van Osselaer, Tony
Vanacker, Peter
Vayssier, Jean
Vehreschild, Manfred
Von Franck, Ernst
Von Keutz, Eckhard
Von Koss, Henning
Von Pescatore, Dominikus
Von Podewils, Hans-Christoph
Von Stillfried, Heinrich
W
Waite, Stephen
Walker, Philippe
Warekois, Thomas
Warmbier, Peter
Weber, Benno
Weber, Thomas
Weeks, Joshua
Weidmann, Ernst
Weissmueller, Joachim
Welter, Wolfgang
Wenning, Werner
Westphal, Dietmar
Wild, Hanno
Wilson, Kirk
Wingen, Franz-Josef
Witasek, Frank
Wohlfeil, Stefan
Wolff, Joachim
Wollweber, Detlef
Wright, Paul
Y
Yim, Marcus
Z
Zervoudis, Demetrios
Zijp, Douwe
Zirakparvar, Mohammad Esmail
Zumbaum, Arne
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
|
Glossary 209 |
Glossary
A
Acaricide Crop protection agent for
combating mites
Acetylsalicylic acid Active ingredient of
Aspirin®
Adalat® Drug
product for the treatment of hypertension;
active ingredient: nifedipine
Admire® Insecticide; active
ingredient: imidacloprid; main applications:
vegetables, rice, fruit, potatoes
Advantage® Antiflea product for
dogs and cats; active ingredient:
imidacloprid
Advantix®
Antiflea/-tick/-mosquito product for dogs; active
ingredients: imidacloprid and permethrin
Advia® Umbrella brand for a fully
automatic system for large-scale laboratories
for the diagnosis of, for example,
cardiovascular disease, infections, metabolic
disorders
Advocate® Deworming
agent for dogs and cats to combat internal
and external parasites; active ingredients:
imidacloprid and moxidectin
Aleve®
Analgesic; active ingredient: naproxen
Alka-Seltzer® Drug product that
binds excess gastric acid, to reduce pain and
fever
Allectus® Insecticide;
active ingredients: imidacloprid and
bifenthrin; main applications: turf and
ornamental lawns
Amperit®
High-performance, versatile thermal spray
powder for surface finishing
Armada® Fungicide; active
ingredients: trifloxystrobin, triadimefon;
main applications: turf and ornamental lawns
Ascensia® Umbrella brand for blood
glucose metering systems and services
Asian rust Fungal disease in soybeans
Aspirin® One of the most famous
analgesics in the world; active ingredient:
acetylsalicylic acid
Aspirin®
Cardio Drug product for protection against
myocardial infarction; active ingredient:
acetylsalicylic acid
Aspirin
Complex® Cold and flu product in
granular form for the treatment of pain, a
runny nose and fever; active ingredients:
acetylsalicylic acid and pseudoephedrine
Aspirin direkt® Analgesic in
chewable tablet form; active ingredient:
acetylsalicylic acid
Aspirin®
Effect Analgesic in granular form to be
taken without water; active ingredient:
acetylsalicylic acid
Aspirin®
Migraine Drug product for the treatment of
migraine-related headache; active
ingredient: acetylsalicylic acid
Aspirin® protect Drug product
for secondary prevention of myocardial
infarction and stroke; active ingredient:
acetylsalicylic acid
Atlantis®
Herbicide; active ingredients: mesosulfuron
and others; main applications: wheat,
triticale, rye
Avelox® Drug
product for the treatment of respiratory
tract infections; active ingredient:
moxifloxacin
B
Bariton® Fungicide for seed
treatment; active ingredients: fluoxastrobin, prothioconazole; main
application: cereals
Basta®
Herbicide; active ingredient:
glufosinateammonium; main applications:
plantation crops (e.g. vines, fruit, oil
palms), potatoes and vegetables
BAY 59-7939
Substance being tested in the treatment and
prevention of thromboembolic disorders
Baycox® Anticoccidial agent for
livestock; active ingredient: toltrazuril
Baydur® Brand name for a rigid
polyurethane integral skin foam
Baytril® Chemotherapeutic agent
for the treatment of severe veterinary
infectious diseases; active ingredient:
enrofloxacin
Bepanthen® Range of
skin care and wound-healing products; active
ingredient: dexpanthenol
Bepanthol® Range of care products
to treat dry, irritated skin; active
ingredient: panthenol
Betanal®
Herbicide; active ingredients:
phenmedipham, desmedipham and ethofumesate;
main application: beets
|
|
|
210 Glossary |
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
C
Canesten® Antifungal drug for
infections of the skin; active ingredient:
clotrimazole or bifonazole
Canola Species of
rape plant
Ciprobay®/Cipro® Drug
product for the treatment of infectious
diseases; active ingredient: ciprofloxacin
Clinitek® Urinalysis systems for
doctors offices and hospitals for the
diagnosis of kidney and bladder disorders,
diabetes and pregnancy
Confidor®
Insecticide; active ingredient:
imidacloprid; main applications: vegetables,
rice, fruit, potatoes
Consumer Products
Business unit in Environmental Science
Curbix® Insecticide; active
ingredient: ethiprole; main applications:
rice
D
DCA 2000®+Analyzer
Convenient analysis unit for doctors offices for the detection of diabetes and kidney
disease
Decis® Insecticide;
active ingredient: deltamethrin; main
applications: cotton, vegetables, cereals
E
Elmiron® Urology drug
product from Ortho-McNeil, co-marketed
by Bayer in the United States
Enabling Technologies Technology
platform that can accelerate development
work and provide support for the production of new
products, system solutions and production
processes by the subgroups
Envidor® Acaricide; active
ingredient: spirodiclofen; main
applications: citrus fruit, fruit, nuts,
grapes
F
Faktor Xa inhibitor See BAY 59-7939
Fandango® Fungicide; active
ingredients: fluoxastrobin, prothioconazole;
main application: cereals
Fast-track approval Accelerated FDA
registration procedure for drugs that are
potentially superior to existing therapeutic
options
Fenikan® Herbicide,
active ingredient: diflufenican; main
applications: winter wheat, winter barley,
rye
FiberMax® Cotton seed for the
markets United States, Turkey, Greece, Spain
and Brazil
Flint® Fungicide;
active ingredient: trifloxystrobin; main
applications: cereals, soybeans, fruit,
grapes
Folicur® Fungicide; active
ingredient: tebuconazole; main
applications: cereals, soybeans, canola,
peanuts
Forbid® Insecticide;
active ingredient: spiromesifen; main
application: ornamental plants
Fungicide
Crop protection agent to combat fungal
diseases
G
Gaucho® Insecticide; active
ingredient: imidacloprid; main
applications: seed dressing for sugar
beet, corn, cereals, cotton, canola
Glucobay® Drug product for the
treatment of diabetes; active ingredient:
acarbose
H
Helixate® Co-marketing name
for recombinant Factor VIII; marketed by
Aventis Behring
Herbicide Crop protection
agent to combat weeds
HSEQ Abbreviation for
Health, Safety, Environment, Quality
Hussar® Herbicide; active
ingredient: iodosulfuron; main
applications: cereals, rice and corn
I
Infinito® Fungicide; active
ingredients: fluopicolide and propamocarb
HCL; main applications: potatoes, vegetables
and ornamental plants
Insecticide Crop
protection agent to combat animal pests
(insects)
InVigor® Seed for summer
canola
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
|
Glossary 211 |
K
Key performance indicators Key
indicators that reflect the main points in
the continuous improvement process for
safety and environmental protection measures
Kirappu® Insecticide; active
ingredient: ethiprole; main application:
rice
K-O Tab® 1-2-3 Insecticide;
active ingredient: deltamethrin; main
application: impregnation of mosquito nets
K-Othrine® Insecticide; active
ingredient: deltamethrin; main applications:
insects that transmit malaria, sleeping
sickness and Chagas disease
Kogenate® Drug product for the
treatment of hemophilia; active ingredient:
recombinant Factor VIII
Kogenate® with
Bio-Set® Recombinant Factor VIII
with needleless delivery system
L
Levitra® Drug product for
the treatment of erectile dysfunction;
active ingredient: vardenafil
Liberty® Herbicide; active
ingredient: glufosinate-ammonium, main
applications: corn, canola, cotton,
soybeans, rice in conjunction with
herbicide-tolerant technology
Life cycle management Measures
taken to extend the marketing period of
registered products through further
development
M
MaisTer® Herbicide; active
ingredients: foramsulfuron and iodosulfuron;
main application: corn
Makrolon®
Brand name for polycarbonate; main
applications: electrical/electronic goods,
optical data storage media
(CDs /DVDs), glazing (solid
and multiwall sheet), automotive industry
Merit® Insecticide; active
ingredient: imidacloprid; main applications:
broad-spectrum insecticide for
non-agricultural grass lawns
Molecular
testing Diagnostic tests and equipment for
molecular analysis of infectious diseases and
cancer
N
Naproxen Active ingredient of Aleve®
Near-patient testing Diagnostic tests
and equipment used directly at the patients
bedside and in doctors offices
Nexavar® Proprietary name for the
active substance sorafineb
O
Oberon®
Insecticide/acaricide; active ingredient:
spiromesifen; main applications:
fruit/vegetables, cotton, ornamental plants
Olympus® Herbicide; active
ingredient: propoxycarbazone sodium;
main application: cereals
One-A-Day® Multivitamin product
with complete daily doses for different users
Orphan drug status Guarantees pharmaceutical
companies exclusive marketing rights in a
specific indication for a defined period of
time when developing drugs to treat rare
diseases
OTC Abbreviation for
over-the-counter, i.e. non-prescription
medications
P
Plant-made pharmaceuticals Manufacture
of pharmaceuticals in plants
Polycarbonate
Durable, impact-resistant plastic; see
Makrolon®
Polyester polyol Raw
material for polyurethane production
Polyether Raw material for polyurethane
production
Polyol Raw material for
polyurethane production
Polyurethane
Important group of plastics
Poncho® Insecticide; active
ingredient: clothianidine; main
applications: seed treatment for corn,
canola, sugar beet, cereals
Premise® Insecticide; active
ingredient: imidacloprid; main application:
termite control
Primary care products Products for
general practitioners
|
|
|
212 Glossary |
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Pritor®
/PritorPlus®
Hypertension drug in conjunction with
a diuretic; active ingredient: telmisartan
Profender® Innovative deworming
agent for cats; active ingredients:
emodepsid and praziquantel
Proline® Fungicide; active
ingredient: prothioconazole; main
applications: cereals, canola
Propylene
oxide Precursor used in the manufacture of
polyurethane raw materials
Puma®
Herbicide; active ingredient:
fenoxaprop-P-ethyl; main applications:
cereals, rice, soybeans, canola
Q
Quickbayt® Insecticide;
active ingredient: imidacloprid; main
application: fly control in animal
housing
R
Rapidlab®
/Rapidpoint®
Blood gas analysis systems for emergency
and intensive-care wards, for determination
of electrolytes and blood gases
Raxil® Fungicide; active
ingredient: tebuconazole; main applications:
seed treatment for wheat and barley
Redoxon® Vitamin C product for
the prevention and treatment of vitamin C
deficiency; active ingredient: ascorbic
acid
Rennie® Medicine to treat
heartburn and acid-related stomach
disorders; active ingredients: calcium
carbonate, magnesium carbonate
Revolver® Herbicide; active
ingredient: foramsulfuron; main
application: turf and ornamental lawns
S
Scenic® Fungicide for seed
treatment; active ingredients: fluoxastrobin, prothioconazole; main
application: cereals
Sorafenib Active ingredient of the
anticancer drug Nexavar® and the
first oral multikinase inhibitor that
attacks both tumor cells and the tumor
vasculature
Specialty Care Specialist and
hospital business for prescription-only
medicines
Sphere® Fungicide;
active ingredients: trifloxystrobin,
cyproconazole; main applications: coffee,
soybeans, cereals, sugar beet
Stakeholders
Our stockholders, employees, business
partners, users of our products and society
in general
Stratego® Fungicide;
active ingredients: trifloxystrobin,
propiconazole; main applications: soybeans,
cereals, rice, corn
Supradyn®
Multivitamin and mineral supplement with
trace elements for protection against general
vitamin and mineral deficiencies
T
Talcid® Drug product to
neutralize excess gastric acid; active
ingredient: hydrotalcite
TPU Abbreviation
for Thermoplastic Polyurethane
Trasylol® Drug product used
during open-heart surgery; active
ingredient: aprotinin
Triple-i Group-wide
innovation initiative based on the concept
of inspiration, ideas and innovation
W
World-scale facility Facility with an
extremely large production capacity, to
safeguard supplies to individual or multiple
regions of the world
Z
Zetia® Cardiovascular drug from
Schering-Plough which Bayer plans to jointly
market with that company in Japan once the
product has gained marketing authorization
Explanations of further specialist
terminology can be found at:
WWW.INVESTOR.BAYER.COM > STOCK > GLOSSARY
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
|
Index 213 |
|
|
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
|
Accounting standards |
|
|
87 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
115 |
|
Annual Stockholders Meeting |
|
Back flap |
|
Asset structure |
|
|
33 |
|
Associates |
|
|
97, 135, 137 |
|
Audit Committee |
|
|
72, 190 |
|
Audit fees |
|
|
185 |
|
Auditor |
|
|
51, 73, 79, 185 |
|
Awards |
|
|
200 |
|
B |
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet |
|
|
33, 81, 131 |
|
Bayer Business Services |
|
Front flap, 75 |
|
Bayer CropScience |
|
Front flap, 6 , 21, 38, |
|
|
|
|
42, 61, 63, 64, 75, 110 |
|
Bayer HealthCare |
|
Front flap, 4, 10, 18, 37, |
|
|
|
|
40, 60, 62, 75, 110 |
|
Bayer Industry Services |
|
Front flap, 75 |
|
Bayer Innovation GmbH |
|
|
45 |
|
Bayer MaterialScience |
|
Front flap, 4, 24, 38, |
|
|
|
|
44, 61, 63, 75, 110, 192 |
|
Bayer stock |
|
|
48, 68, 76, 129 |
|
Bayer stock data |
|
|
69 |
|
Bayer Technology Services |
|
Front flap, 45, 75 |
|
Board of Management |
|
|
8, 70, 72, 74, 186, 204 |
|
Bonds |
|
|
169 |
|
Business environment |
|
|
16 |
|
Business strategy |
|
|
60 |
|
C |
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
29 |
|
Capital structure |
|
|
33 |
|
Cash flow |
|
|
15, 27, 177 |
|
Changes in stockholders equity |
|
|
141 |
|
Changes in the Bayer Group |
|
|
112 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
177 |
|
Compliance Committee |
|
|
75 |
|
Consolidated financial statements |
|
|
72, 87, |
|
|
|
|
88, 92, 191 |
|
Consolidated statement of cash flows |
|
|
29, 33, |
|
|
|
|
82, 101, 184 |
|
Consolidation methods |
|
|
92 |
|
Contact |
|
|
216 |
|
Corporate citizen |
|
|
1 |
|
Corporate Compliance Program |
|
|
75 |
|
Corporate governance |
|
|
7, 72, 191 |
|
Corporate Governance Code |
|
|
72, 191 |
|
Corporate social responsibility |
|
|
7, 49 |
|
Corporate structure |
|
Front flap, 205 |
Cost of materials |
|
|
122 |
|
Critical accounting policies |
|
|
103 |
|
Currency risk |
|
|
52, 173 |
|
Currency translation |
|
|
93 |
|
D |
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
98, 175 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
88, 118, 120 |
|
Distribution |
|
|
37 |
|
Divestitures |
|
|
117 |
|
Dividend |
|
Front flap, 7, 35, 70 |
|
E |
|
|
|
|
Earnings performance |
|
|
32 |
|
Earnings per share |
|
|
69, 129 |
|
Economic hedges |
|
|
175 |
|
Economic outlook |
|
|
59 |
|
Employees |
|
|
35, 75, 123 |
|
Environmental protection |
|
|
49, 108, 165 |
|
Exchange rates |
|
|
93 |
|
Exhange rate risk |
|
|
52, 173 |
|
|
|
|
214 Index |
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
F |
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
174, 175 |
|
Financial calendar |
|
Back flap |
|
Financial instruments |
|
|
138, 173 |
|
Financial liabilities |
|
|
168 |
|
Financial position |
|
|
29 |
|
Financial risks |
|
|
173 |
|
Financial strategy |
|
|
31 |
|
Future perspectives |
|
|
59 |
|
G |
|
|
|
|
Glossary |
|
|
209 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
131 |
|
Governance bodies |
|
|
202 |
|
Group Leadership Circle |
|
|
206 |
|
H |
|
|
|
|
Hedge accounting |
|
|
98, 175 |
|
HSEQ |
|
|
46 |
|
Human Resources Committee |
|
|
73, 190 |
|
I |
|
|
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
88, 174 |
|
Impairment testing |
|
|
102 |
|
Income statements |
|
|
32, 35, 80 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
109, 126 |
|
Independent Auditors Report |
|
|
79 |
|
Indices |
|
|
48, 68, 216 |
|
Innovation and growth |
|
Front flap, 6 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
95, 104, 131 |
|
Interest expense net |
|
|
125 |
|
Interest rate risk |
|
|
52, 174 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
98, 140 |
|
Investor relations |
|
|
70 |
|
K |
|
|
|
|
Key data by segment and region |
|
|
26, 84 |
|
Key data by subgroup |
|
Front flap, 17, 84 |
|
Key performance indicators |
|
|
46 |
|
L |
|
|
|
|
LANXESS |
|
|
4, 57, 118 |
|
Leasing |
|
|
139 |
|
Legal risks |
|
|
53, 179 |
|
Liquid assets |
|
|
141 |
|
M |
|
|
|
|
Management report |
|
|
14 |
|
Managements statement of responsibility
for financial reporting |
|
|
78 |
|
Minority stockholders interest in
income/expense |
|
|
129 |
|
Mission Statement |
|
|
7, 36 |
|
N |
|
|
|
|
Net debt |
|
|
15, 30 |
|
Net income |
|
Front flap |
|
Non-operating result |
|
|
124 |
|
Notes to the consolidated financial
statements |
|
|
84 |
|
O |
|
|
|
|
Objectives for 2006 |
|
|
62 |
|
Operating result |
|
|
123 |
|
Organization chart |
|
|
205 |
|
Other financial assets |
|
|
137 |
|
Other financial commitments |
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
|
Index 215 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-operating expenses |
|
|
125 |
|
Other non-operating income |
|
|
125 |
|
Other operating expense |
|
|
122 |
|
Other operating income |
|
|
94, 122 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
139 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
99, 123 |
|
P |
|
|
|
|
Pensions |
|
|
36, 52, 106, 145, 156 |
|
Performance by Region |
|
|
26 |
|
Performance by Segment |
|
|
17 |
|
Performance by subgroup |
|
|
17 |
|
Personnel expenses |
|
|
123 |
|
Portfolio management |
|
|
39 |
|
Presidial Committee |
|
|
72, 190 |
|
Primary financial instruments |
|
|
174 |
|
Procurement and distribution |
|
|
37 |
|
Procurement market risk |
|
|
52, 173, 174 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
96, 104, 134 |
|
Proposal for distribution of the profit |
|
|
35 |
|
Provisions |
|
|
99, 108, 109, 161 |
|
Provisions for pensions and
other post-employment benefits |
|
|
106,145 |
|
R |
|
|
|
|
R&D expenses |
|
|
94, 121 |
|
Recognition and valuation principles |
|
|
94 |
|
Regions |
|
|
26 |
|
Remuneration of the Board of Management |
|
|
186 |
|
Remuneration of the Supervisory Board |
|
|
73, 186 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
39, 106 |
|
Responsible Care |
|
|
46 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
166 |
|
Risk management |
|
|
50, 173 |
|
S |
|
|
|
|
Salaries (see Remuneration)
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
94, 106, 121 |
|
Scope of consolidation |
|
|
112 |
|
Segment reporting |
|
|
17, 84, 110 |
|
Segments |
|
|
17, 84, 103, 110 |
|
Selling expenses |
|
|
121 |
|
Share price |
|
|
69 |
|
Statement of recognized income
and expense |
|
|
83 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
36,161 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
33, 81 |
|
Strategy |
|
|
60, 72 |
|
Subsequent events |
|
|
58 |
|
Supervisory Board |
|
|
70, 72, 73, 186, 189, 202 |
|
Sustainability |
|
|
46, 75 |
|
Sustainable development |
|
Front flap |
|
Sustainable investment |
|
|
48 |
|
T |
|
|
|
|
Ten-year financial summary |
|
Back flap |
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
|
171 |
|
Trade accounts receivable |
|
|
140 |
|
U |
|
|
|
|
UNEP |
|
|
49 |
|
V |
|
|
|
|
Value-added |
|
|
48 |
|
Value management |
|
|
27, 28 |
|
|
|
|
216 Masthead |
|
Bayer Annual Report 2005 |
Global commitment to the environment, education, sports and health
Social responsibility and
sustainability are integral to Bayers
corporate policy. This commitment is also
evidenced by the companys participation in
numerous initiatives and projects around the
world. Logos relating to a selection of these
activities appear in the left margin in the
order in which the activities are described
below.
The concept of Responsible Care has a
long tradition at Bayer. The company has been
a member of the World Business Council for
Sustainable Development since 1997 and is
also among the founding members of the German
sustainable development forum econsense.
Bayer is listed in various indices and
represented in investment funds that honor
companies for pursuing responsible,
future-oriented corporate strategies.
Examples are Storebrand Principal Funds, the
Advanced Sustainable Performance Indices, the
Dow Jones Sustainability Indices (ASPI) Eurozone
and the FTSE4Good series of
indices. In 2004 the company also became a
member of the Global Reporting Initiative.
Bayer is a founding member of the Global
Compact and, in Brazil, supports both the
Abrinq Foundation and the Brazilian
governments Fome Zero (Zero Hunger)
program. In mid-2004, Bayer broadened its
partnership with UNEP through a new
cooperation agreement that includes Bayers
Young Environmental Envoy program. For years,
Bayer has also been an active member of the
Global Business Coalition on HIV/AIDS (GBC).
Bayer is an official partner of
Germany Land of Ideas, a joint
initiative of the German government and the
countrys industry federation under the
patronage of German President Horst Köhler
established in connection with the 2006
Soccer World Cup.
Publisher
Bayer AG, 51368 Leverkusen,
Germany
Editor
Ute Bode,
phone ++49/214/30-58992
e-mail: ute.bode.ub@bayer-ag.de
English edition
Bayer
Industry Services GmbH & Co. OHG
Central Language Service
Investor Relations
Peter
Dahlhoff, phone ++49/214/30-33022
e-mail: peter.dahlhoff.pd1@bayer-ag.de
Date of publication
March 6, 2006
Bayer on the Internet
www.bayer.com
ISSN 0343/1975
Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report contains forward-looking
statements. These statements use words like
believes, assumes, expects or similar
formulations. Various known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and other factors could
lead to material differences between the
actual future results, financial situation, development or performance of our
company and those either expressed or implied
by these statements.
These factors include, among other things:
|
|
downturns in the business cycle of
the industries in which we compete; |
|
|
|
new regulations, or changes to existing
regulations, that increase our operating
costs or otherwise reduce our profitability; |
|
|
|
increases in the price of our raw
materials, especially if we are unable to
pass these costs along to customers; |
|
|
|
loss
or reduction of patent protection for our
products; |
|
|
|
liabilities, especially those
incurred as a result of environmental laws
or product liability litigation; |
|
|
|
fluctuation in international currency
exchange rates as well as changes in the
general economic climate; and |
|
|
|
other
factors identified in this Annual Report. |
These factors include those discussed in our
public reports filed with the Frankfurt Stock
Exchange and with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission (including our Form
20-F). In view of these uncertainties, we
caution readers not to place undue reliance
on these forward-looking statements. We
assume no liability whatsoever to update
these forward-looking statements or to
conform them to future events or
developments.
Ten-Year Financial Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Group |
|
1996 |
|
|
1997 |
|
|
1998 |
|
|
1999 |
|
|
2000 |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
24,853 |
|
|
|
28,124 |
|
|
|
28,062 |
|
|
|
27,320 |
|
|
|
30,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales outside Germany |
|
|
82.2 |
% |
|
|
83.9 |
% |
|
|
83.6 |
% |
|
|
84.3 |
% |
|
|
85.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share of foreign consolidated companies |
|
|
65.4 |
% |
|
|
67.0 |
% |
|
|
67.5 |
% |
|
|
68.3 |
% |
|
|
69.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating result (EBIT) |
|
|
2,306 |
|
|
|
3,077 |
|
|
|
3,155 |
|
|
|
3,357 |
|
|
|
3,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
2,282 |
|
|
|
2,611 |
|
|
|
2,728 |
|
|
|
2,836 |
|
|
|
2,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) after taxes |
|
|
1,405 |
|
|
|
1,509 |
|
|
|
1,615 |
|
|
|
2,018 |
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent assets |
|
|
10,689 |
|
|
|
12,230 |
|
|
|
13,981 |
|
|
|
15,614 |
|
|
|
20,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
1,051 |
|
|
|
1,909 |
|
|
|
2,213 |
|
|
|
4,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
8,974 |
|
|
|
10,307 |
|
|
|
10,970 |
|
|
|
11,986 |
|
|
|
13,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent assets1 |
|
|
986 |
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
1,102 |
|
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
2,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
14,593 |
|
|
|
15,467 |
|
|
|
15,396 |
|
|
|
15,665 |
|
|
|
16,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
5,144 |
|
|
|
5,424 |
|
|
|
5,781 |
|
|
|
4,992 |
|
|
|
6,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
7,028 |
|
|
|
7,588 |
|
|
|
7,894 |
|
|
|
7,533 |
|
|
|
9,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquid assets |
|
|
2,421 |
|
|
|
2,455 |
|
|
|
1,721 |
|
|
|
3,140 |
|
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity structure of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent assets |
|
|
42.3 |
% |
|
|
44.2 |
% |
|
|
47.6 |
% |
|
|
49.9 |
% |
|
|
55.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
57.7 |
% |
|
|
55.8 |
% |
|
|
52.4 |
% |
|
|
50.1 |
% |
|
|
44.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities |
|
|
3,520 |
|
|
|
3,896 |
|
|
|
4,730 |
|
|
|
4,466 |
|
|
|
6,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent |
|
|
1,615 |
|
|
|
2,150 |
|
|
|
2,404 |
|
|
|
2,359 |
|
|
|
2,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
1,905 |
|
|
|
1,746 |
|
|
|
2,326 |
|
|
|
2,107 |
|
|
|
3,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense net |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
(311 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on sales |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on stockholders equity |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
13.1 |
% |
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
|
14.4 |
% |
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cash flow2 |
|
|
2,959 |
|
|
|
3,313 |
|
|
|
3,394 |
|
|
|
3,192 |
|
|
|
4,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures for property, plant,
equipment and intangible assets |
|
|
1,931 |
|
|
|
2,331 |
|
|
|
2,703 |
|
|
|
2,632 |
|
|
|
2,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,326 |
|
|
|
1,479 |
|
|
|
1,521 |
|
|
|
1,744 |
|
|
|
2,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization in percent
of capital expenditures |
|
|
68.7 |
% |
|
|
63.4 |
% |
|
|
56.3 |
% |
|
|
66.3 |
% |
|
|
80.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel expenses (including pension expenses) |
|
|
7,718 |
|
|
|
7,895 |
|
|
|
8,106 |
|
|
|
7,549 |
|
|
|
7,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of employees (year end) |
|
|
142,200 |
|
|
|
144,600 |
|
|
|
145,100 |
|
|
|
120,400 |
|
|
|
122,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
1,845 |
|
|
|
1,983 |
|
|
|
2,045 |
|
|
|
2,252 |
|
|
|
2,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity including
minority interest (total) |
|
|
10,765 |
|
|
|
12,232 |
|
|
|
12,779 |
|
|
|
15,182 |
|
|
|
16,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock |
|
|
1,851 |
|
|
|
1,867 |
|
|
|
1,867 |
|
|
|
1,870 |
|
|
|
1,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves (excluding net income) |
|
|
7,287 |
|
|
|
8,638 |
|
|
|
9,087 |
|
|
|
11,134 |
|
|
|
12,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
|
1,504 |
|
|
|
1,614 |
|
|
|
2,002 |
|
|
|
1,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority stockholders interest |
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities (total) |
|
|
14,517 |
|
|
|
15,465 |
|
|
|
16,598 |
|
|
|
16,097 |
|
|
|
20,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets (total) |
|
|
25,282 |
|
|
|
27,697 |
|
|
|
29,377 |
|
|
|
31,279 |
|
|
|
36,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proportion of total assets (total) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
42.6 |
% |
|
|
44.2 |
% |
|
|
43.5 |
% |
|
|
48.5 |
% |
|
|
44.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
57.4 |
% |
|
|
55.8 |
% |
|
|
56.5 |
% |
|
|
51.5 |
% |
|
|
55.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer AG |
|
1996 |
|
|
1997 |
|
|
1998 |
|
|
1999 |
|
|
2000 |
|
Income (loss) after taxes / Net income (loss) |
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
1,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation to (from) retained earnings |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividend payment |
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
747 |
|
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
1,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend per share () |
|
|
0.87 |
|
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
|
1.02 |
|
|
|
1.30 |
|
|
|
1.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figures for 1996 through 2003 as reported. 2004 figures restated.
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
new designation due to changes in balance sheet presentation according to IAS 1; Designation
for 1996-2003 figures was Investments |
|
2 |
|
for definition see Bayer Group Key Data on front flap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Bayer Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,275 |
|
|
|
29,624 |
|
|
|
28,567 |
|
|
|
23,278 |
|
|
|
27,383 |
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85.5 |
% |
|
|
86.4 |
% |
|
|
85.8 |
% |
|
|
86.9 |
% |
|
|
84.7 |
% |
|
Sales outside Germany |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70.9 |
% |
|
|
72.2 |
% |
|
|
73.3 |
% |
|
|
76.4 |
% |
|
|
74.7 |
% |
|
Share of foreign consolidated companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,676 |
|
|
|
1,518 |
|
|
|
(1,119 |
) |
|
|
1,875 |
|
|
|
2,812 |
|
|
Operating result (EBIT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
(1,994 |
) |
|
|
1,222 |
|
|
|
2,199 |
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
1,063 |
|
|
|
(1,349 |
) |
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
1,595 |
|
|
Income (loss) after taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,702 |
|
|
|
23,513 |
|
|
|
18,232 |
|
|
|
16,859 |
|
|
|
20,130 |
|
|
Noncurrent assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,014 |
|
|
|
8,879 |
|
|
|
6,514 |
|
|
|
5,952 |
|
|
|
7,688 |
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,543 |
|
|
|
12,436 |
|
|
|
9,937 |
|
|
|
7,662 |
|
|
|
8,321 |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,145 |
|
|
|
2,198 |
|
|
|
1,781 |
|
|
|
3,245 |
|
|
|
4,121 |
|
|
Other noncurrent assets1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,337 |
|
|
|
16,890 |
|
|
|
17,673 |
|
|
|
15,972 |
|
|
|
16,592 |
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,818 |
|
|
|
6,342 |
|
|
|
5,885 |
|
|
|
4,738 |
|
|
|
5,504 |
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,748 |
|
|
|
9,752 |
|
|
|
8,925 |
|
|
|
7,635 |
|
|
|
7,565 |
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
771 |
|
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
2,863 |
|
|
|
3,599 |
|
|
|
3,523 |
|
|
Liquid assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity structure of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58.6 |
% |
|
|
56.4 |
% |
|
|
48.7 |
% |
|
|
51.4 |
% |
|
|
54.8 |
% |
|
Noncurrent assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.4 |
% |
|
|
40.5 |
% |
|
|
47.2 |
% |
|
|
48.6 |
% |
|
|
45.2 |
% |
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,380 |
|
|
|
10,159 |
|
|
|
9,426 |
|
|
|
9,191 |
|
|
|
8,952 |
|
|
Financial liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,071 |
|
|
|
7,318 |
|
|
|
7,378 |
|
|
|
7,025 |
|
|
|
7,185 |
|
|
Noncurrent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,309 |
|
|
|
2,841 |
|
|
|
2,048 |
|
|
|
2,166 |
|
|
|
1,767 |
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(349 |
) |
|
|
(449 |
) |
|
|
(353 |
) |
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
(341 |
) |
|
Interest expense net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
(3.9 |
%) |
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
Return on sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
(9.7 |
%) |
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
14.4 |
% |
|
Return on stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,009 |
|
|
|
2,782 |
|
|
|
2,864 |
|
|
|
2,885 |
|
|
|
3,477 |
|
|
Gross cash flow2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,617 |
|
|
|
2,383 |
|
|
|
1,739 |
|
|
|
977 |
|
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
Capital
expenditures for property, plant, equipment and intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,464 |
|
|
|
2,814 |
|
|
|
2,634 |
|
|
|
1,933 |
|
|
|
1,758 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94.2 |
% |
|
|
118.1 |
% |
|
|
151.5 |
% |
|
|
197.9 |
% |
|
|
126.7 |
% |
|
Depreciation
and amortization in percent of capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,849 |
|
|
|
8,176 |
|
|
|
7,906 |
|
|
|
6,026 |
|
|
|
5,912 |
|
|
Personnel expenses (including pension expenses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,900 |
|
|
|
122,600 |
|
|
|
115,400 |
|
|
|
91,700 |
|
|
|
93,700 |
|
|
Number of employees (year end) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,559 |
|
|
|
2,588 |
|
|
|
2,404 |
|
|
|
1,927 |
|
|
|
1,886 |
|
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,020 |
|
|
|
15,455 |
|
|
|
12,336 |
|
|
|
10,943 |
|
|
|
11,157 |
|
|
Stockholders equity including minority interest (total) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,870 |
|
|
|
1,870 |
|
|
|
1,870 |
|
|
|
1,870 |
|
|
|
1,870 |
|
|
Capital stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,087 |
|
|
|
12,405 |
|
|
|
11,704 |
|
|
|
8,277 |
|
|
|
7,610 |
|
|
Reserves (excluding net income) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
965 |
|
|
|
1,060 |
|
|
|
(1,361 |
) |
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
Minority stockholders interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,019 |
|
|
|
23,320 |
|
|
|
23,013 |
|
|
|
26,645 |
|
|
|
25,565 |
|
|
Liabilities (total) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,039 |
|
|
|
41,692 |
|
|
|
37,445 |
|
|
|
37,588 |
|
|
|
36,722 |
|
|
Total assets (total) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proportion of total assets (total) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.0 |
% |
|
|
37.5 |
% |
|
|
32.9 |
% |
|
|
29.1 |
% |
|
|
30.4 |
% |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54.0 |
% |
|
|
56.5 |
% |
|
|
61.4 |
% |
|
|
70.9 |
% |
|
|
69.6 |
% |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Bayer AG |
|
657 |
|
|
|
1,162 |
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
Income (loss) after taxes / Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
(550 |
) |
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
Allocation to (from) retained earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
694 |
|
|
Total dividend payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
Dividend per share () |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Group Key Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Group |
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
23,278 |
|
|
|
27,383 |
|
|
|
+ 17.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA1 |
|
|
3,834 |
|
|
|
4,647 |
|
|
|
+ 21.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating result [EBIT] |
|
|
1,875 |
|
|
|
2,812 |
|
|
|
+ 50.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
1,222 |
|
|
|
2,199 |
|
|
|
+ 80.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
+ 133.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share2 |
|
|
0.94 |
|
|
|
2.19 |
|
|
|
+ 133.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cash flow3 |
|
|
2,885 |
|
|
|
3,477 |
|
|
|
+ 20.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow4 |
|
|
2,262 |
|
|
|
3,542 |
|
|
|
+ 56.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity (total, i.e. including discontinued operations) |
|
|
10,943 |
|
|
|
11,157 |
|
|
|
+ 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets (total, i.e. including discontinued operations) |
|
|
37,588 |
|
|
|
36,722 |
|
|
|
- 2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt/equity ratio (total, i.e. including discontinued operations) |
|
|
2.43 |
|
|
|
2.29 |
|
|
|
- 5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
977 |
|
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
+ 42.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees at year end |
|
|
91,700 |
|
|
|
93,700 |
|
|
|
+ 2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel expenses |
|
|
6,026 |
|
|
|
5,912 |
|
|
|
- 1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
1,927 |
|
|
|
1,886 |
|
|
|
- 2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer AG |
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividend payment in million |
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
+ 72.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend per
share in |
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
|
+ 72.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 EBITDA = operating result (EBIT) plus depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
2 Earnings per share = as defined in IAS 33: net income divided by the average number of
shares outstanding (730.34 million shares) |
|
|
|
3 Gross cash flow = operating result (EBIT) plus depreciation and amortization, minus
income taxes, minus gains/plus losses on retirements of noncurrent assets, plus/minus
changes in pension provisions. The latter item includes the elimination of non-cash
components of the operating result. It also contains benefit payments during the year. |
|
|
|
4 Net cash flow = cash flow from operating activities according to IAS 7 |
Cancer drug developed in record time
COVER PICTURE At the end of 2005
sooner than expected the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) granted marketing
authorization for Nexavar® (active
ingredient: sorafenib) in the treatment of
advanced kidney cancer. For the German-American
development team from Bayer HealthCare and Onyx
Pharmaceuticals, this decision marks the climax
of their extraordinary cooperation so far. The
drug was developed in record time, three years
faster than the industry average.
After the cooperation agreement with Onyx
Pharmaceuticals was signed in 1994, more than
200,000 substances were tested for their
efficacy and more than 6,000 compounds were
synthesized. Finally, in 1999, the researchers
came upon development candidate BAY 43-9006,
and the first clinical trials started just a
year later. Phase III studies began in 2003.
Sorafenib became Bayers first pharmaceutical
substance to be granted fast-track status by
the FDA, which can accelerate a drugs testing
and registration process in the United States.
Fast-track status is reserved for drugs that
have demonstrated
the potential to treat a serious or
life-threatening condition for which no
comparable medical therapy currently exists.
Bayer HealthCare has since applied to the
European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA) for
approval to market Nexavar® within
the European Union. If marketing authorization
is granted, the product could be launched in
the European Union, too, in the second half of
2006. Further studies will now aim to discover
whether Nexavar® can be used to
treat other malignant tumors, such as cancer of
the liver, lungs or skin.
The cover picture shows members of the
successful research and development team at
Bayers U.S. pharmaceutical research center in West
Haven, Connecticut representing the many
employees involved in the entire project.
Behind them is an oversized projection
depicting the impact of sorafenib on human
cells. In the picture are Timothy Lowinger,
Scott Wilhelm, Bernd Riedl, Susan Kelley and
Edward Huguenel (bottom, from left), along with
Brian Schwartz and Christopher Carter (top,
from left).
bayer corporate structure > please lift flap >
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayer Aktiengesellschaft |
|
|
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ ppa. Dr. Alexander Rosar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
Title:
|
|
Dr. Alexander Rosar
Head of Investor Relations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Dr. Armin Buchmeier |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
Title:
|
|
Dr. Armin Buchmeier
Senior Counsel |
Date:
March 9, 2006