UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
☒QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016
☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-34857
Gold Resource Corporation
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its charter)
Colorado |
84-1473173 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
2886 Carriage Manor Point, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80906
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(303) 320-7708
(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
Larger accelerated filer |
☐ |
Accelerated filer |
☒ |
Non-accelerated filer |
☐(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company |
☐ |
Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 56,566,874 shares of common stock outstanding as of November 1, 2016.
GOLD RESOURCE CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
References in this report to agreements to which Gold Resource Corporation is a party and the definition of certain terms from those agreements are not necessarily complete and are qualified by reference to the agreements. Readers should refer to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the exhibits filed or incorporated by reference therein.
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
GOLD RESOURCE CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
17,065 |
|
$ |
12,822 |
|
Gold and silver rounds/bullion |
|
|
3,876 |
|
|
2,988 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
2,414 |
|
|
321 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
9,409 |
|
|
8,753 |
|
Income tax receivable |
|
|
937 |
|
|
3,794 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
1,693 |
|
|
3,940 |
|
Total current assets |
|
|
35,394 |
|
|
32,618 |
|
Property, plant and mine development, net |
|
|
70,959 |
|
|
51,637 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
15,055 |
|
|
21,064 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
1,547 |
|
|
1,216 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
122,955 |
|
$ |
106,535 |
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
5,433 |
|
$ |
11,600 |
|
Mining royalty taxes payable |
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
230 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
2,596 |
|
|
3,072 |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
9,108 |
|
|
14,902 |
|
Reclamation and remediation liabilities |
|
|
2,554 |
|
|
2,815 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
11,662 |
|
|
17,717 |
|
Shareholders' equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock - $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
no shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Common stock - $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,903,272 and 56,566,874 shares issued and outstanding, respectively, at September 30, 2016 and 54,603,104 and 54,266,706 shares issued and outstanding, respectively, at December 31, 2015 |
|
|
57 |
|
|
55 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
111,790 |
|
|
96,766 |
|
Accumulated retained earnings (deficit) |
|
|
6,501 |
|
|
(948) |
|
Treasury stock at cost, 336,398 shares |
|
|
(5,884) |
|
|
(5,884) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(1,171) |
|
|
(1,171) |
|
Total shareholders' equity |
|
|
111,293 |
|
|
88,818 |
|
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity |
|
$ |
122,955 |
|
$ |
106,535 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
GOLD RESOURCE CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales, net |
|
$ |
21,367 |
|
$ |
19,437 |
|
$ |
64,968 |
|
$ |
71,082 |
|
Mine cost of sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production costs |
|
|
12,767 |
|
|
13,411 |
|
|
34,570 |
|
|
40,462 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
3,189 |
|
|
1,579 |
|
|
9,049 |
|
|
5,195 |
|
Reclamation and remediation |
|
|
48 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
139 |
|
|
36 |
|
Total mine cost of sales |
|
|
16,004 |
|
|
14,996 |
|
|
43,758 |
|
|
45,693 |
|
Mine gross profit |
|
|
5,363 |
|
|
4,441 |
|
|
21,210 |
|
|
25,389 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
2,027 |
|
|
2,913 |
|
|
5,875 |
|
|
8,032 |
|
Exploration expenses |
|
|
881 |
|
|
1,810 |
|
|
2,027 |
|
|
6,416 |
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
2,908 |
|
|
4,723 |
|
|
7,902 |
|
|
14,448 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
2,455 |
|
|
(282) |
|
|
13,308 |
|
|
10,941 |
|
Other (expense) income, net |
|
|
(74) |
|
|
(1,033) |
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
(2,080) |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
2,381 |
|
|
(1,315) |
|
|
14,478 |
|
|
8,861 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
787 |
|
|
(846) |
|
|
6,479 |
|
|
3,465 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,594 |
|
$ |
(469) |
|
$ |
7,999 |
|
$ |
5,396 |
|
Net income (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
$ |
(0.01) |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
$ |
(0.01) |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
55,781,382 |
|
|
54,179,369 |
|
|
54,994,430 |
|
|
54,179,369 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
57,597,392 |
|
|
54,179,369 |
|
|
55,589,307 |
|
|
54,201,274 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
GOLD RESOURCE CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(U.S. dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|||||
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
7,999 |
|
$ |
5,396 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
250 |
|
|
(1,522) |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
9,343 |
|
|
6,331 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
997 |
|
|
3,293 |
|
Other operating adjustments |
|
|
(531) |
|
|
2,472 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(2,092) |
|
|
(435) |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(657) |
|
|
(1,149) |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
1,203 |
|
|
(897) |
|
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities |
|
|
(2,774) |
|
|
5,069 |
|
Mining royalty and income taxes payable/receivable |
|
|
3,690 |
|
|
(4,528) |
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
64 |
|
|
466 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
17,492 |
|
|
14,496 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(12,637) |
|
|
(21,837) |
|
Proceeds from the sale of equity investments |
|
|
749 |
|
|
- |
|
Other investing activities |
|
|
(315) |
|
|
40 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(12,203) |
|
|
(21,797) |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options |
|
|
391 |
|
|
- |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(818) |
|
|
(4,876) |
|
Repayment of capital leases |
|
|
(606) |
|
|
(1,123) |
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(1,033) |
|
|
(5,999) |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(13) |
|
|
(136) |
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
4,243 |
|
|
(13,436) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
12,822 |
|
|
27,541 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
17,065 |
|
$ |
14,105 |
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense paid |
|
$ |
13 |
|
$ |
65 |
|
Income and mining taxes paid |
|
$ |
256 |
|
$ |
8,464 |
|
Non-cash investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for the acquisition of Walker Lane Minerals Corp |
|
$ |
13,060 |
|
$ |
- |
|
Common stock issued for the acquisition of the Mina Gold property |
|
$ |
850 |
|
$ |
- |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2016
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Preparation of Financial Statements
Basis of Presentation: The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements included herein are expressed in United States dollars and are prepared in conformance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) and applicable rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regarding interim financial reporting. The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Gold Resource Corporation (the “Company”), its U.S. subsidiaries GRC Nevada Inc. and Walker Lane Minerals Corp (“Walker Lane”), and its Mexican subsidiary Don David Gold Mexico S.A. de C.V. Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to SEC rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures included herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. Unless otherwise noted, there have been no material changes to the footnotes from those accompanying the audited financial statements contained in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K.
In management’s opinion, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contained herein reflect all material normal and recurring adjustments that are necessary for the fair statement of the Company’s financial position, results of operations, and cash flows on a basis consistent with that of its audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015. The results of operations for the interim period ended September 30, 2016 may not be indicative of results of operations to be expected for the full fiscal year.
2. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Stock-based compensation
Accounting Standards Update 2016-09—Compensation—Stock compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to employee share-based payment accounting. On March 30, 2016 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance intended to improve the accounting for employee share-based payments. The standard affects all organizations that issue share-based payment awards to their employees and was part of the FASB’s Simplification Initiative. The objective of the Simplification Initiative is to identify, evaluate, and improve areas of U.S. GAAP for which cost and complexity can be reduced while maintaining or improving the usefulness of the information provided to users of financial statements. The areas for simplification in this standard involve several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. For public business entities, the amendments in this standard are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company is the process of evaluating the impact of this standard on the financial statements and disclosures.
Revenue recognition
Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09—Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). On May 28, 2014, FASB issued guidance that requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. This standard was further amended in August 2015, March 2016, April 2016 and May 2016 by Accounting Standards Updates No. 2015-14, No. 2016-08, No. 2016-10 and No.
4
2016-12, respectively. The guidance will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance when it becomes effective. The new standard is effective for the Company for periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early application is not permitted. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or the cumulative effect transition method. The Company does not anticipate any significant changes due to the implementation of this update, as there are no complex contractual arrangements with current customers, therefore our current revenue recognition model is not expected to change.
3. Acquisitions
Mina Gold Property
On August 12, 2016, the Company acquired the Mina Gold property located in Mineral County, Nevada from Nevada Select Royalty Inc. (“Nevada Select”), a privately-held entity, for $1.0 million, which includes 130,169 shares of common stock valued at $0.9 million and cash of $0.1 million. The property consists of patented and unpatented mining claims. Nevada Select retained a net smelter return royalty (“NSR”) of 3% on the patented claims and a 2% NSR on the unpatented claims. The Company has the right to buy down 1% of the NSR on the patented claims for $1.0 million and 0.5% of the NSR on the unpatented claims for $0.5 million.
Isabella Pearl Project
On August 12, 2016, the Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of Walker Lane, a privately-held entity, which owns the Isabella Pearl project located in Mineral County, Nevada, in exchange for 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $13.1 million and cash of $0.2 million. The land position totals 341 unpatented mining claims, of which 58 claims encompass the Isabella Pearl deposit. The 58 Isabella Pearl claims along with 25 additional claims have a 3% NSR, with the balance of the claims having a 1% NSR.
In connection with the above two acquisitions, the Company incurred acquisition costs of $0.1 million, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The transactions were accounted for as asset acquisitions and transaction costs were capitalized in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The assets and liabilities were recorded at the market value of the Company’s shares at the date of the transactions. The Walker Lane acquisition resulted in the Company recording $5.6 million of deferred tax liability related to the temporary book and tax differences in the basis of the property.
The acquisition method requires the Company to determine the fair value of all acquired assets, including identifiable intangible assets, and all assumed liabilities. The total cost of acquisitions is allocated to the underlying identifiable net assets, based on their respective estimated fair values. Determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires management’s judgment and often involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including assumptions with respect to future cash inflows and outflows, discount rates, and asset lives, among other items.
The preliminary allocation of the purchase price is based on management’s estimates and may be adjusted after obtaining additional information regarding, among other things, asset valuations, liabilities assumed and revisions of previous estimates. A preliminary allocation of the purchase consideration in thousands as of September 30, 2016 is as follows:
5
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Price |
|
$ |
14,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preliminary allocation of purchase price: |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
60 |
|
Mineral interests and mineral rights |
|
|
19,413 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
460 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
19,933 |
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
5,615 |
|
Reclamation and remediation liabilities |
|
|
38 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
5,653 |
|
Net fair value |
|
$ |
14,280 |
|
4. Gold and Silver Rounds/Bullion
The Company periodically purchases gold and silver bullion on the open market to use in its dividend exchange program under which shareholders may exchange their cash dividends for minted gold and silver rounds. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company made no purchases of gold or silver bullion. At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company’s holdings of rounds/bullion, using quoted market prices, consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
||||||||
|
|
Gold |
|
Silver |
|
Gold |
|
Silver |
||||
|
|
(in thousands, except ounces and per ounce ) |
||||||||||
Ounces |
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
91,164 |
|
|
1,623 |
|
|
91,522 |
Per ounce |
|
$ |
1,323 |
|
$ |
19.35 |
|
$ |
1,062 |
|
$ |
13.82 |
Total |
|
$ |
2,112 |
|
$ |
1,764 |
|
$ |
1,723 |
|
$ |
1,265 |
5. Inventories
At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, inventories consisted of the following:
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||
Stockpiles - underground mine |
|
$ |
554 |
|
$ |
121 |
|
Stockpiles - open pit mine |
|
|
323 |
|
|
729 |
|
Concentrates |
|
|
1,778 |
|
|
1,432 |
|
Materials and supplies (1) |
|
|
6,754 |
|
|
6,471 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
9,409 |
|
$ |
8,753 |
|
(1)Net of reserve for obsolescence of $194 and $92, respectively.
6. Income Taxes
The Company recorded income tax expense of $0.8 million and $6.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded income tax benefit of $0.8 million and income tax expense of $3.5 million, respectively.
6
In 2015, the Mexican government approved a 2016 Federal Revenue Act that provides tax incentives, including tax credits on Mexican Excise Duty (a.k.a., IEPS), for the acquisition of combustible fossils to be used in productive processes. The Company’s Mexican operations utilize a significant amount of diesel fuel for power generation that qualifies for such tax credits. These tax credits can be applied against income taxes payable, as well as other income tax withholdings for 2016. In the first nine months of 2016, the Company recorded $2.3 million of fuel tax credits with the offset to production cost with $1.7 million applied to income tax payable and $0.6 million applied to other taxes payable.
The Company has asserted permanent reinvestment of all Mexico undistributed earnings as of December 31, 2015. The impact of the planned annual dividends for 2016, net of foreign tax credits, is reflected in the estimated annual effective tax rate. The Company’s annualized effective rate differs from the statutory rate primarily due to dividends from our Mexican subsidiary as well as differences in statutory rates for income and mining taxes in Mexico.
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences are available for deduction. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities (including the impact of available carryback and carryforward periods), projected future taxable income and tax-planning strategies in making this assessment. As of September 30, 2016, the Company believes it has sufficient positive evidence to conclude that its federal and foreign deferred tax assets are more likely than not to be realized. However, the Company has determined that the realization of its state deferred tax assets is not more likely that not to be realized and has a valuation allowance offsetting the state deferred tax assets.
As of September 30, 2016, the Company believes that it has no liability for uncertain tax positions.
7. Property, Plant and Mine Development, net
At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, property, plant and mine development consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||
Asset retirement costs |
|
$ |
659 |
|
$ |
659 |
|
Construction-in-progress (1) |
|
|
6,181 |
|
|
3,916 |
|
Furniture and office equipment |
|
|
1,569 |
|
|
1,555 |
|
Land and mineral rights |
|
|
230 |
|
|
230 |
|
Light vehicles and other mobile equipment |
|
|
1,821 |
|
|
1,887 |
|
Machinery and equipment (2) |
|
|
20,073 |
|
|
19,867 |
|
Mill facilities and infrastructure |
|
|
8,990 |
|
|
8,920 |
|
Mineral interests and mineral rights (3) |
|
|
19,413 |
|
|
- |
|
Mine development |
|
|
36,072 |
|
|
31,079 |
|
Software and licenses |
|
|
1,617 |
|
|
1,193 |
|
Subtotal (4) |
|
|
96,625 |
|
|
69,306 |
|
Accumulated depletion, depreciation and amortization (5) |
|
|
(25,666) |
|
|
(17,669) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
70,959 |
|
$ |
51,637 |
|
(1) |
Includes $5.1 and $2.6 million for Switchback development at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. |
(2) |
Includes nil and $3.1 million of assets recorded under capital leases at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. |
(3) |
These assets relate to the recent Nevada Mining Unit property acquisitions, please see Note 3 for additional information. |
(4) |
Includes accrued capital expenditures of $0.1 and $2.9 million for the periods ended September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. |
(5) |
Includes nil and $0.5 million for the periods ended September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, of accumulated depreciation associated with capitalized leased assets. Depreciation on the leased assets is recorded over their estimated useful lives. |
The Company recorded depletion, depreciation and amortization expense of $3.3 million and $9.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded depletion, depreciation and amortization expense of $1.6 million and $5.4 million respectively.
7
8. Reclamation and Remediation
The Company’s reclamation and remediation obligations primarily relate to the Aguila Project. The following table presents the changes in reclamation and remediation obligations for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2015:
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||
Reclamation liabilities – balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
2,192 |
|
$ |
2,545 |
|
Changes in estimate |
|
|
37 |
|
|
17 |
|
Foreign currency exchange gain |
|
|
(257) |
|
|
(370) |
|
Reclamation liabilities – balance at end of period |
|
|
1,972 |
|
|
2,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation – balance at beginning of period |
|
|
623 |
|
|
448 |
|
Changes in estimate |
|
|
- |
|
|
187 |
|
Accretion expense |
|
|
33 |
|
|
42 |
|
Foreign currency exchange gain |
|
|
(74) |
|
|
(54) |
|
Asset retirement obligation – balance at end of period |
|
|
582 |
|
|
623 |
|
Total period end balance |
|
$ |
2,554 |
|
$ |
2,815 |
|
9. Shareholders’ Equity
The Company declared and paid $0.8 million and $4.9 million of dividends during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. On October 26, 2016, the Board of Directors declared a dividend on common stock totaling $0.1 million payable in November 2016.
Please see Note 3 and Note 10 for additional information.
10. Equity Incentive Plans
The Company maintains an Equity Incentive Plan that provides for the issuance of up to 5 million shares of common stock in the form of incentive and non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units, stock grants, stock units, performance shares, performance share units and performance cash. The Plan was adopted in April 2016 and replaced the Amended and Restated Stock Option and Stock Grant Plan.
A total of 717,000 options with a term of 10 years were granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, of which 168,000 vested immediately and the remainder vest over a three year period. A total of 188,803 restricted stock units were granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, of which 26,739 vest within six months and the remainder vest over a three year period.
The fair value of stock option grants is amortized over the respective vesting periods. Total stock-based compensation expense has been allocated as follows:
8
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||||||||
Production costs |
|
$ |
55 |
|
$ |
412 |
|
$ |
172 |
|
$ |
1,019 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
450 |
|
|
968 |
|
|
819 |
|
|
2,274 |
|
Exploration expense |
|
|
6 |
|
|
- |
|
|
6 |
|
|
- |
|
Total |
|
$ |
511 |
|
$ |
1,380 |
|
$ |
997 |
|
$ |
3,293 |
|
11. Embedded Derivatives
The Company’s provisional concentrate sales contain an embedded derivative that is required to be separated from the host contract for accounting purposes. The host contract is the receivable from the sale of the concentrates at the prevailing indices’ prices at the time of sale. The embedded derivative, which does not qualify for hedge accounting, is marked to market through operations each period prior to final settlement. Please see Note 14 for additional information.
The following table summarizes the Company’s unsettled sales contracts at September 30, 2016, with the quantities of metals under contract subject to final pricing over the next several months:
|
|
|
Gold |
|
|
Silver |
|
|
Copper |
|
|
Lead |
|
|
Zinc |
|
|
|
|
(ounces) |
|
|
(ounces) |
|
|
(tonnes) |
|
|
(tonnes) |
|
|
(tonnes) |
|
Under contract |
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
410,594 |
|
|
208 |
|
|
956 |
|
|
2,594 |
|
Average forward price |
|
$ |
1,306 |
|
$ |
19.47 |
|
$ |
4,767 |
|
$ |
1,889 |
|
$ |
2,268 |
|
12. Other (Expense) Income, Net
Other (expense) income, net, consisted of the following:
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||||||||
Unrealized currency exchange (loss) gain |
|
$ |
(259) |
|
$ |
(497) |
|
$ |
(57) |
|
$ |
326 |
|
Realized currency exchange gain (loss) |
|
|
44 |
|
|
(105) |
|
|
183 |
|
|
(369) |
|
Gain (loss) from gold and silver rounds/bullion, net (1) |
|
|
93 |
|
|
(187) |
|
|
925 |
|
|
(260) |
|
(Loss) gain from investments, net (1) |
|
|
(49) |
|
|
(227) |
|
|
351 |
|
|
(1,726) |
|
Loss on disposal of fixed assets |
|
|
(9) |
|
|
- |
|
|
(523) |
|
|
- |
|
Gain on insurance reimbursement |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
620 |
|
|
- |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
106 |
|
|
(17) |
|
|
(329) |
|
|
(51) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
(74) |
|
$ |
(1,033) |
|
$ |
1,170 |
|
$ |
(2,080) |
|
(1) |
Gains and losses due to changes in the fair value are non-cash in nature until such time that they are realized through cash transactions. For additional information regarding the fair value measurements and investments, please see Note 14. |
9
13. Net Income (Loss) per Common Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated based on the assumption that stock options outstanding, which have an exercise price less than the average market price of the Company’s common shares during the period, would have been exercised on the later of the beginning of the period or the date granted and that the funds obtained from the exercise were used to purchase common shares at the average market price during the period. All the Company’s restricted stock units are considered to be dilutive.
The effect of the Company’s dilutive securities are calculated using the treasury stock method and only those instruments that result in a reduction in income per share are included in the calculation. Options to purchase 3.7 million and 4.3 million shares of common stock at weighted average exercise prices of $10.32 and $9.34 were outstanding at September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted weighted average common shares, as the exercise price of the options exceeded the average price of the Company’s common stock during those periods and therefore would not affect the calculation of earnings per share.
Net income (loss) per common share is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||||
|
|
(in thousands, except shares and per share amounts) |
|
||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,594 |
|
$ |
(469) |
|
$ |
7,999 |
|
$ |
5,396 |
|
Basic weighted average shares of common stock outstanding |
|
|
55,781,382 |
|
|
54,179,369 |
|
|
54,994,430 |
|
|
54,179,369 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock-based awards |
|
|
1,816,010 |
|
|
- |
|
|
594,877 |
|
|
21,905 |
|
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
57,597,392 |
|
|
54,179,369 |
|
|
55,589,307 |
|
|
54,201,274 |
|
Net income (loss) per: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic share |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
$ |
(0.01) |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
Diluted share |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
$ |
(0.01) |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
14. Fair Value Measurement
Fair value accounting establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
Level 1Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
Level 2Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; and
Level 3Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity).
As required by accounting guidance, assets are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The following tables set forth certain of the Company’s assets measured at fair value by level within the fair value hierarchy as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
Input Hierarchy Level |
|
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds and other bank deposits |
|
$ |
17,065 |
|
$ |
12,822 |
|
Level 1 |
|
Gold and silver rounds/bullion |
|
|
3,876 |
|
|
2,988 |
|
Level 1 |
|
Accounts receivable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables from provisional concentrate sales |
|
|
2,414 |
|
|
321 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current investments |
|
|
- |
|
|
400 |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
|
$ |
23,355 |
|
$ |
16,531 |
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of money market funds and are valued at cost, which approximates fair value. Gold and silver rounds/bullion consist of precious metals used in the dividend program which are valued using quoted market prices. Please see Note 4 for additional information. The Company’s current investments consisted of marketable equity securities which were valued using quoted market prices. The Company determined that it was not practicable to estimate the fair value of its non-current investment in equity securities of $0.2 million and as such, it is reported at cost.
Trade accounts receivable include amounts due to the Company for shipments of concentrates and doré sold to customers. Concentrate sales contracts provide for provisional pricing as specified in such contracts. These sales contain an embedded derivative related to the provisional pricing mechanism which is bifurcated and accounted for as a derivative. At the end of each reporting period, the Company records an adjustment to sales to reflect the mark-to-market of outstanding provisional invoices based on the forward price curve. Because these provisionally priced sales have not yet settled as of the reporting date, the mark-to-market adjustment related to these invoices is included in accounts receivable as of each reporting date. Please see Note 11 for additional information.
15. Supplementary Cash-Flow Information
Other operating adjustments and write-downs within the net cash provided by operations on the statement of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||
Unrealized (gain) loss on gold and silver rounds/bullion |
|
$ |
(925) |
|
$ |
260 |
|
Unrealized foreign currency exchange loss (gain) |
57 | (326) | |||||
Unrealized (gain) loss on investments |
|
|
(348) |
|
|
1,726 |
|
Loss on disposition of fixed assets |
|
|
523 |
|
|
- |
|
Other |
|
|
162 |
|
|
812 |
|
Total other operating adjustments |
|
$ |
(531) |
|
$ |
2,472 |
|
11
.
ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion summarizes the results of operations of Gold Resource Corporation and its subsidiaries (“we”, “our”, or “us”) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and compares those results to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015. It also analyzes our financial condition at September 30, 2016 and compares it to our financial condition at December 31, 2015. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the management’s discussion and analysis and the audited financial statements and footnotes for the year ended December 31, 2015 contained in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.
The discussion also presents certain financial measures that are not prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“non-GAAP”) but which are important to management in its evaluation of our operating results and are used by management to compare our performance with what we perceive to be peer group mining companies, and are relied on as part of management’s decision-making process. Management believes these measures may also be important to investors in evaluating our performance. For a detailed description of each of the non-GAAP financial measures, please see the discussion below under Non-GAAP Measures.
See Forward-Looking Statements at the end of this Item 2 for important information regarding statements contained herein.
Overview
We are a mining company which pursues gold and silver projects that are expected to have both low operating costs and high returns on capital. We are presently focused on mineral production from the Aguila Project in Oaxaca, Mexico, which is included in our Oaxaca Mining Unit. Our processing facilities at the Aguila Project produce doré and concentrates primarily from ore mined from the Arista underground mine, which contains precious metals of gold and silver and base metals of copper, lead and zinc.
In our financial statements, we report the sale of precious metals and base metals as revenue and we periodically review our revenue streams to ensure that this treatment remains appropriate. We consider precious metals to be the primary driver of our economic decisions and believe that base metals are secondary products.
Precious metal gold equivalent is determined by taking gold ounces produced or sold, plus silver ounces produced or sold converted to precious metal gold equivalent ounces using the gold to silver average price ratio for the period. The gold and silver average prices used to determine the gold to silver average price ratio are the actual metal prices realized from sales of our gold and silver. Please see the section titled Non-GAAP Measures below for additional information concerning cash cost per ounce measures.
Highlights for the third quarter of 2016 are included below and discussed further in our Results of Operations.
Highlights
· |
Working capital of $26.3 million; |
· |
Net income of $1.6 million; |
· |
Acquisition of two potentially high grade gold properties in the Walker Lane Mineral Belt; |
· |
Receipt of final permit for the Alta Gracia property; |
· |
Total cash cost per precious metal gold equivalent ounce sold of $623; and |
· |
Total all-in sustaining cost per precious metal gold equivalent ounce sold of $907. |
Acquisitions
Isabella Pearl Project: On August 12, 2016, we purchased the Walker Lane Minerals Corp which owns a 100% interest in the Isabella Pearl project, a potential open pit heap leach project located in Mineral County, Nevada. The project contains third party Proven and Probable Reserves of 191,400 gold ounces at an average grade of 2.18 grams per tonne (“g/t”) and is in advanced stages of engineering and production permitting.
12
Mina Gold: On August 12, 2016, we also purchased the Mina Gold property located in Mineral County, Nevada. The Mina Gold property contains an historic third party estimate of mineralized material totaling 1,606,000 tonnes grading 1.88 (g/t) gold and is within close proximity to both Isabella Pearl and Gold Mesa.
Please see Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about our property acquisitions.
Exploration and Development Activities
Exploration activities are performed on our portfolio of exploration properties in Oaxaca and Nevada. All of the properties that make up our Oaxaca Mining Unit are located along what is known as the San Jose structural corridor, which runs north 70 degrees west. Our properties comprise 55 continuous kilometers of this structural corridor which spans three historic mining districts in Oaxaca. Our Nevada exploration properties are in close proximity to other major gold deposits in the Walker Lane Mineral Belt which are known for their significant and high-grade gold-silver production from historic mines.
Oaxaca Mining Unit, Mexico
The Aguila Project: Our mine exploration activities during the third quarter of 2016 at the Aguila Project focused mainly on underground exploration drilling at the Switchback and Arista vein systems. The Switchback drilling program continued to target further exploration and delineation of the multiple high-grade parallel veins for reserve definition and mine plan optimization. A second Switchback ramp initiated from the 21 level of the Arista mine continued to advance during the third quarter and plan to access previously delineated mineralized material at the Switchback vein system early in the fourth quarter. Nineteen diamond drill holes totaling 4,318 meters were completed at the Aguila Project during the third quarter of 2016.
Alta Gracia property: The blasting permit was received at the end of the third quarter. Mining operations can now commence at the Alta Gracia property. We have already begun development and access to the mineralization by improving existing historic drift accesses. We will initially target small scale underground mining with delivery of mineralized material to our Aguila processing facility anticipated in the fourth quarter of this year or the first quarter of 2017.
Las Margaritas property: An initial diamond drilling program commenced during the third quarter of 2016 on the new gold and silver mineralized zone called “Trenes” identified at Margaritas.
Nevada Mining Unit, U.S.A.
Isabella Pearl property: During the third quarter, the Company was granted its permit for a drill program targeting reserve definition and further metallurgical studies, in addition to a water well to supply future mining operations. The drill program for reserve definition has begun and the water well drilling is scheduled to begin during the fourth quarter of 2016. Engineering and design modification are underway to advance the Isabella-Pearl property toward a production decision.
Mina Gold property: Review of geological, exploration and historical mining data continued on the Mina Gold property during the third quarter of 2016. An initial reverse circulation drill program is targeted for the Mina Gold property during the fourth quarter of 2016.
Gold Mesa property: Surface drilling continued at Gold Mesa during the third quarter of 2016. The exploration drill program has now tested six target areas consisting of eighty-three holes totaling 2,883 meters. This drilling confirmed and extended surface and near surface gold mineralization at Gold Mesa. Additional drilling is targeted for the fourth quarter of 2016.
13
Results of Operations
The following table summarizes our results of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||||||||
Sales, net |
|
$ |
21,367 |
|
$ |
19,437 |
|
$ |
64,968 |
|
$ |
71,082 |
|
Mine gross profit |
|
|
5,363 |
|
|
4,441 |
|
|
21,210 |
|
|
25,389 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
2,455 |
|
|
(282) |
|
|
13,308 |
|
|
10,941 |
|
Other (expense) income |
|
|
(74) |
|
|
(1,033) |
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
(2,080) |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
2,381 |
|
|
(1,315) |
|
|
14,478 |
|
|
8,861 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
787 |
|
|
(846) |
|
|
6,479 |
|
|
3,465 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,594 |
|
$ |
(469) |
|
$ |
7,999 |
|
$ |
5,396 |
|
Sales, net
Metal sales of $21.4 million for the third quarter of 2016 increased by $1.9 million, or 10%, when compared to the same period in 2015. Our increased sales were due to stronger market prices for precious and base metals. Gold, silver, lead and zinc realized prices increased by 20%, 43%, 18% and 42%, respectively, compared to the same period in 2015. The increased prices were partially offset by lower precious and base metals production.
Metal sales of $65.0 million for the first nine months of 2016 decreased by $6.1 million, or 9%, when compared to the same period in 2015. Our 2016 sales decreased primarily due to the lower production of silver, copper, and lead, when compared to the same period in 2015, as a result of lower grades. Lower production was partially offset by higher average realized prices when compared to the same period in 2015.
Please see the Production and Sales Statistics table below for additional information regarding our mineral sales statistics.
Production
For the third quarter of 2016, mill production totaled 6,066 ounces of gold and 431,335 ounces of silver, a decrease of 11% and 23%, respectively, over the same period in 2015. Production during the third quarter of 2016 was impacted by lower grades processed, when compared to the same period in 2015.
For the first nine months of 2016, mill production totaled 22,540 ounces of gold, an increase of 3% over the same period in 2015, while silver, copper, and lead production decreased, mainly due to the lower grades, offset by an 11% increase in zinc production to 10,306 tonnes for the first nine months of 2016.
We continue mining narrower, higher grade veins at the Arista deposit and have supplemented the volume with lower grade, stockpiled open pit ore mined in years past. The open pit stockpiles have primarily gold, negligible silver and no base metals. We processed 11,459 tonnes and 38,764 tonnes of stockpiled open pit ore during the third quarter and first nine months of 2016, respectively. The net effect of running stockpiled open pit ore is that it lowers the overall grades for all metals processed.
Gold and silver ore grades vary depending on the area of the Arista deposit being mined and generally speaking, we expected grades to be lower than in the prior year when we mine in the deeper levels of the deposit. We remain on target with our 2016 annual production outlook, targeting a plus or minus 5 percent production, of 26,000 gold ounces and 1.9 million silver ounces.
On a precious metal gold equivalent basis, our mill production totaled 12,763 ounces and 42,281 ounces for the third quarter and first nine months of 2016, respectively. Please see the Production and Sales Statistics table below for additional information regarding our mineral production statistics.
14
During the third quarter and first nine months of 2016, we processed an average of 1,278 and 1,269 ore tonnes per operating day, respectively, compared to 1,143 and 1,104, respectively, for the same periods in 2015. The Aguila mill’s flotation circuit processing capacity is a nominal 1,500 tonnes per day. Achieving this processing rate in the future is dependent upon our ability to develop the mine to a point where ore extraction can consistently achieve target capacity while meeting grade and dilution parameters.
The following Production and Sales Statistics table summarizes certain information about our mining operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||||
Milled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tonnes Milled (1) |
|
|
113,945 |
|
|
105,309 |
|
|
331,423 |
|
|
300,190 |
|
Tonnes Milled per Day (2) |
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
1,143 |
|
|
1,269 |
|
|
1,104 |
|
Grade |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Gold Grade (g/t) |
|
|
1.86 |
|
|
2.25 |
|
|
2.36 |
|
|
2.52 |
|
Average Silver Grade (g/t) |
|
|
128 |
|
|
180 |
|
|
146 |
|
|
216 |
|
Average Copper Grade (%) |
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
0.39 |
|
Average Lead Grade (%) |
|
|
1.18 |
|
|
1.41 |
|
|
1.18 |
|
|
1.37 |
|
Average Zinc Grade (%) |
|
|
3.45 |
|
|
4.02 |
|
|
3.71 |
|
|
3.78 |
|
Recoveries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Gold Recovery (%) |
|
|
89 |
|
|
90 |
|
|
90 |
|
|
90 |
|
Average Silver Recovery (%) |
|
|
92 |
|
|
92 |
|
|
92 |
|
|
93 |
|
Average Copper Recovery (%) |
|
|
78 |
|
|
80 |
|
|
77 |
|
|
79 |
|
Average Lead Recovery (%) |
|
|
74 |
|
|
75 |
|
|
72 |
|
|
75 |
|
Average Zinc Recovery (%) |
|
|
82 |
|
|
83 |
|
|
84 |
|
|
82 |
|
Mill production (before payable metal deductions) (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold (ozs.) |
|
|
6,066 |
|
|
6,825 |
|
|
22,540 |
|
|
21,960 |
|
Silver (ozs.) |
|
|
431,335 |
|
|
561,985 |
|
|
1,437,975 |
|
|
1,932,611 |
|
Copper (tonnes) |
|
|
213 |
|
|
343 |
|
|
777 |
|
|
929 |
|
Lead (tonnes) |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
2,847 |
|
|
3,071 |
|
Zinc (tonnes) |
|
|
3,232 |
|
|
3,499 |
|
|
10,306 |
|
|
9,299 |
|
Payable metal sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold (ozs.) |
|
|
6,683 |
|
|
6,220 |
|
|
21,096 |
|
|
21,994 |
|
Silver (ozs.) |
|
|
410,337 |
|
|
503,929 |
|
|
1,337,668 |
|
|
1,770,093 |
|
Copper (tonnes) |
|
|
200 |
|
|
332 |
|
|
739 |
|
|
877 |
|
Lead (tonnes) |
|
|
893 |
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
2,629 |
|
|
2,875 |
|
Zinc (tonnes) |
|
|
2,480 |
|
|
2,905 |
|
|
8,503 |
|
|
7,668 |
|
Average metal prices realized (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold ($ per oz.) |
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
1,177 |
|
Silver ($ per oz.) |
|
|
20.79 |
|
|
14.50 |
|
|
17.45 |
|
|
16.09 |
|
Copper ($ per tonne) |
|
|
4,791 |
|
|
4,883 |
|
|
4,577 |
|
|
5,436 |
|
Lead ($ per tonne) |
|
|
1,908 |
|
|
1,619 |
|
|
1,808 |
|
|
1,746 |
|
Zinc ($ per tonne) |
|
|
2,421 |
|
|
1,701 |
|
|
2,012 |
|
|
1,981 |
|
Precious metal gold equivalent ounces produced (mill production) (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold Ounces |
|
|
6,066 |
|
|
6,825 |
|
|
22,540 |
|
|
21,960 |
|
Gold Equivalent Ounces from Silver |
|
|
6,697 |
|
|
7,308 |
|
|
19,741 |
|
|
26,410 |
|
Total Precious Metal Gold Equivalent Ounces |
|
|
12,763 |
|
|
14,133 |
|
|
42,281 |
|
|
48,370 |
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||||
Precious metal gold equivalent ounces sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold Ounces |
|
|
6,683 |
|
|
6,220 |
|
|
21,096 |
|
|
21,994 |
|
Gold Equivalent Ounces from Silver |
|
|
6,371 |
|
|
6,553 |
|
|
18,364 |
|
|
24,189 |
|
Total Precious Metal Gold Equivalent Ounces |
|
|
13,054 |
|
|
12,773 |
|
|
39,460 |
|
|
46,183 |
|
Total cash cost before by-product credits per precious metal gold equivalent ounce sold (5) |
|
$ |
1,287 |
|
$ |
1,250 |
|
$ |
1,152 |
|
$ |
1,046 |
|
Total cash cost after by-product credits per precious metal gold equivalent ounce sold (5) |
|
$ |
623 |
|
$ |
603 |
|
$ |
511 |
|
$ |
505 |
|
Total all-in sustaining cost per precious metal gold equivalent ounce sold (5) |
|
$ |
907 |
|
$ |
1,516 |
|
$ |
910 |
|
$ |
1,027 |
|
Total all-in cost per precious metal gold equivalent ounce sold (5) |
|
$ |
1,021 |
|
$ |
1,736 |
|
$ |
1,027 |
|
$ |
1,287 |
|
16
(1) |
For the third quarter and first nine months of 2016, this includes 11,459 and 38,764 tonnes, respectively of low-grade stockpile open pit ore. |
(2) |
Based on actual days the mill operated during the period. |
(3) |
Mill production represents metal contained in concentrates produced at the mill, which is before payable metal deductions are levied by the buyer of our concentrates. Payable metal deduction quantities are defined in our contracts with the buyer of our concentrates and represent an estimate of metal contained in the concentrates produced at our mill which the buyer cannot recover through the smelting process. There are inherent limitations and differences in the sampling method and assaying of estimated metal contained in concentrates that are shipped, and those contained metal estimates are derived from sampling methods and assaying throughout the mill production process. The Company monitors these differences to ensure that precious metal mill production quantities are materially correct. |
(4) |
Average metal prices realized vary from the market metal prices due to final settlement adjustments from our provisional invoices when they are settled. Our average metal prices realized will therefore differ from the market average metal prices in most cases. |
(5) |
For a reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to total mine cost of sales, which is the most comparable U.S. GAAP measure, please see Non-GAAP Measures. |
Other Financial Results
Mine gross profit increased to $5.4 million or by 21% for the third quarter and decreased to $21.2 million or by 16% for the first nine months of 2016, compared to the same periods in 2015. The third quarter of 2016 gross profit increase was due to a reduction of production costs as a result of cost reduction efforts and increased metals prices (please see Note 6 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information). Gross profit decreased in the first nine months of 2016 primarily due to lower sales volume, offset somewhat by higher realized gold and silver metal prices as compared to the same period in 2015.
General and administrative expenses decreased $0.9 million and $2.2 million, respectively, for the third quarter and first nine months of 2016 compared to the same periods in 2015 due to a decrease in stock based compensation expense, lower audit fees and other cost reduction measures, partially offset by increased IT support costs.
Exploration expenses decreased $0.9 million and $4.4 million respectively, for the third quarter and first nine months of 2016 compared to the same periods in 2015 due to reduced exploration spending as a result of cost cutting measures. We continued exploration activities at both our Oaxaca and Nevada Mining Units during the first nine months of 2016, although at a reduced rate from the same periods in 2015. For the third quarter and first nine months of 2016, our exploration costs were $0.5 million and $1.1 million, respectively, at our Oaxaca Mining Unit. For the third quarter and first nine months of 2016, our exploration costs were $0.4 million and $0.9 million at our Nevada Mining Unit.
Other (expense) income, net decreased in the third quarter to $0.1 million of expense, compared to $1.0 million of expense for the same period in 2015. Other income increased to $1.2 million for the first nine months of 2016 compared to other expense of $2.1 million for the same period in 2015 due to foreign currency gains, an increase in the value of gold and silver rounds/bullion and an increase in the market value of equity investments in the 2016 periods.
Provision for income taxes increased to $0.8 million and $6.5 million respectively, for the third quarter and first nine months of 2016. The increase in taxes is commensurate with our increase in income for the third quarter and first nine months of 2016 compared to the same periods in 2015. Please see Note 6 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
17
Non-GAAP Measures
Throughout this report we have provided information prepared or calculated according to U.S. GAAP and have referenced some non-GAAP performance measures which we believe will assist with understanding the performance of the business. These measures are based on precious metal gold equivalent ounces sold and include cash cost before by-product credits per ounce, total cash cost after by-product credits per ounce, total all-in sustaining cost per ounce (“AISC”) and all-in cost per ounce (“AIC”). Because the non-GAAP performance measures do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by U.S. GAAP, they may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. Accordingly, these measures should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for, measures of performance prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These non-GAAP measures are not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flow from operations as determined under GAAP.
Total cash cost, after by-product credits, is a measure developed by the Gold Institute in an effort to provide a uniform standard for comparison purposes. The guidance was first issued in 1996 and revised in November 1999. AISC and AIC are calculated based on guidance from the World Gold Council issued in June 2013.
Total cash cost before by-product credits includes all direct and indirect operating cash costs related to our production of metals (including mining, milling and other plant facility costs, smelter treatment and refining charges, royalties, and site general and administrative costs) less stock based compensation allocated to production costs plus treatment and refining costs.
Total cash cost after by-product credits includes total cash cost before by-product credits less by-product credits, or revenues earned from base metals.
AISC includes total cash cost after by-product credits plus other costs related to sustaining production, including sustaining capital expenditures, exploration and general and administrative costs. We determined sustaining capital expenditures as those capital expenditures that are necessary to maintain current production and execute the current mine plan. General and administrative costs are derived from the amounts presented in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, less administrative depreciation cost.
AIC includes all-in sustaining cost plus non-sustaining capital expenditures and exploration expense. Capital expenditures to develop new operations, or related to projects at existing operations where these projects will enhance production or reserves, are classified as non-sustaining. Exploration expenses related to projects that are designed to increase or enhance future production are classified as non-sustaining and are derived from the exploration expense amounts presented in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Cash cost before by-product credits per ounce, total cash cost after by-product credits per ounce, AISC and AIC are calculated by dividing the relevant costs, as determined using the cost elements noted above, by precious metal gold equivalent ounces sold for the periods presented.
Adjusted cash flow from mine site operations is furnished to provide additional information and is a non-GAAP measure.
Reconciliations to U.S. GAAP
The following table provides a reconciliation of total cash cost after by-product credits to total mine cost of sales (a U.S. GAAP measure) as presented in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations:
18
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||||||||
Total cash cost after by-product credits |
|
$ |
8,126 |
|
$ |
7,714 |
|
$ |
20,226 |
|
$ |
23,333 |
|
Treatment and refining charges |
|
|
(4,082) |
|
|
(2,973) |
|
|
(11,078) |
|
|
(8,869) |
|
By-product credits |
|
|
8,668 |
|
|
8,258 |
|
|
25,250 |
|
|
24,979 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
3,189 |
|
|
1,579 |
|
|
9,049 |
|
|
5,195 |
|
Reclamation and remediation |
|
|
48 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
139 |
|
|
36 |
|
Stock-based compensation allocated to production costs |
|
|
55 |
|
|
412 |
|
|
172 |
|
|
1,019 |
|
Total mine cost of sales |
|
$ |
16,004 |
|
$ |
14,996 |
|
$ |
43,758 |
|
$ |
45,693 |
|
The following table presents a reconciliation of the non-GAAP measures of total cash cost before by-product credits, total cash cost after by-product credits and AISC to AIC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||||
|
|
(in thousands, except ounces sold and cost per precious metal gold equivalent ounce sold) |
|
||||||||||
Total cash cost before by-product credits (1) |
|
$ |
16,794 |
|
$ |
15,972 |
|
$ |
45,476 |
|
$ |
48,312 |
|
By-product credits (2) |
|
|
(8,668) |
|
|
(8,258) |
|
|
(25,250) |
|
|
(24,979) |
|
Total cash cost after by-product credits |
|
|
8,126 |
|
|
7,714 |
|
|
20,226 |
|
|
23,333 |
|
Sustaining capital expenditures |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
8,898 |
|
|
10,040 |
|
|
16,237 |
|
General and administrative expenses (3) |
|
|
1,961 |
|
|
2,758 |
|
|
5,720 |
|
|
7,877 |
|
Total all-in sustaining cost |
|
|
11,837 |
|
|
19,370 |
|
|
35,986 |
|
|
47,447 |
|
Non-sustaining capital expenditures |
|
|
611 |
|
|
996 |
|
|
2,597 |
|
|
5,600 |
|
Non-sustaining exploration expense |
|
|
881 |
|
|
1,810 |
|
|
2,027 |
|
|
6,416 |
|
Total all-in cost |
|
$ |
13,329 |
|
$ |
22,176 |
|
$ |
40,610 |
|
$ |
59,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Precious metal gold equivalent ounces sold (4) |
|
|
13,054 |
|
|
12,773 |
|
|
39,460 |
|
|
46,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash cost before by-product credits per precious metal gold equivalent ounce sold |
|
$ |
1,287 |
|
$ |
1,250 |
|
$ |
1,152 |
|
$ |
1,046 |
|
By-product credits per precious metal gold equivalent ounces sold |
|
|
(664) |
|
|
(647) |
|
|
(641) |
|
|
(541) |
|
Total cash cost after by-product credits per precious metal gold equivalent ounce sold |
|
|
623 |
|
|
603 |
|
|
511 |
|
|
505 |
|
Other sustaining expenditures per precious metal gold equivalent ounces sold |
|
|
284 |
|
|
913 |
|
|
399 |
|
|
522 |
|
Total all-in sustaining cost per precious metal gold equivalent ounce sold |
|
|
907 |
|
|
1,516 |
|
|
910 |
|
|
1,027 |
|
Non-sustaining expenditures per precious metal gold equivalent ounce sold |
|
|
114 |
|
|
220 |
|
|
117 |
|
|
260 |
|
Total all-in cost per precious metal gold equivalent ounce sold |
|
$ |
1,021 |
|
$ |
1,736 |
|
$ |
1,027 |
|
$ |
1,287 |
|
(1) |
Production cost less stock based compensation allocated to production cost plus treatment and refining charges. |
(2) |
Please see the tables below for a summary of our by-product revenue and by-product credit per precious metal equivalent ounces sold. |
(3) |
Less administrative depreciation costs of $0.1 million and $0.1 million for the third quarter of 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the first nine months of 2016 and 2015, respectively. |
(4) |
Gold ounces sold, plus gold equivalent ounces of silver ounces sold converted to gold ounces using our realized gold price per ounce to silver price per ounce ratio. |
19
The following tables summarizes our by-product revenue and by-product credit per precious metal gold equivalent ounce sold:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||||||||
By-product credits by dollar value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper sales |
|
$ |
959 |
|
$ |
1,619 |
|
$ |
3,384 |
|
$ |
4,769 |
|
Lead sales |
|
|
1,704 |
|
|
1,698 |
|
|
4,755 |
|
|
5,020 |
|
Zinc sales |
|
|
6,005 |
|
|
4,941 |
|
|
17,111 |
|
|
15,190 |
|
Total sales from by-products |
|
$ |
8,668 |
|
$ |
8,258 |
|
$ |
25,250 |
|
$ |
24,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||||
By-product credits per precious metal gold equivalent ounce sold: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper sales |
|
$ |
73 |
|
$ |
127 |
|
$ |
86 |
|
$ |
103 |
|
Lead sales |
|
|
131 |
|
|
133 |
|
|
121 |
|
|
109 |
|
Zinc sales |
|
|
460 |
|
|
387 |
|
|
434 |
|
|
329 |
|
Total by-product precious metal gold ounces sold |
|
$ |
664 |
|
$ |
647 |
|
$ |
641 |
|
$ |
541 |
|
The following table provides a reconciliation of adjusted cash flow from mine site operations to mine gross profit (a U.S. GAAP measure) as presented in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
||||||||||
Mine gross profit |
|
$ |
5,363 |
|
$ |
4,441 |
|
$ |
21,210 |
|
$ |
25,389 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
55 |
|
|
412 |
|
|
172 |
|
|
1,019 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
3,189 |
|
|
1,579 |
|
|
9,049 |
|
|
5,195 |
|
Reclamation and remediation |
|
|
48 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
139 |
|
|
36 |
|
Adjusted cash flow from mine site operations |
|
$ |
8,655 |
|
$ |
6,438 |
|
$ |
30,570 |
|
$ |
31,639 |
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our liquidity improved during the first nine months of 2016. As of September 30, 2016, we had working capital of $26.3 million, consisting of current assets of $35.4 million and current liabilities of $9.1 million. This represents an increase of $8.6 million from the working capital balance of $17.7 million at December 31, 2015. Our working capital balance fluctuates as we use cash to fund our operations, financing and investing activities, including exploration, mine development, income taxes and shareholder dividends.
Cash and cash equivalents increased $4.2 million to $17.1 million during the first nine months of 2016.
Net cash provided by operating activities of $17.5 million, increased $3.0 million for the first nine months of 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 primarily due to the increase in net income.
Net cash used in investing activities of $12.2 million, decreased $9.6 million for the first nine months of 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 primarily due to a reduction in capital expenditures for mine development at our Aguila Project. Our planned development drilling expenditures can be significantly more or less depending on variables including available capital, the ongoing results from our drilling programs and market conditions.
20
Net cash used in financing activities decreased $5.0 million for the first nine months of 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 primarily due to reduced dividends. For the first nine months of 2016 and 2015 we paid dividends of $0.8 million and $4.9 million, respectively.
We believe that our liquidity and capital resources are adequate to fund our operations for the foreseeable future.
Critical Accounting Estimates
There have been no changes in our critical accounting estimates since December 31, 2015, with the exception of the purchase price allocation related to the Walker Lane Minerals Corp acquisition. Please see Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains or incorporates by reference “forward-looking statements,” as that term is used in federal securities laws, about our financial condition, results of operations and business. These statements include, among others:
· |
statements about our future exploration and plans for development of our properties; |
· |
statements concerning the benefits that we expect will result from our business activities and certain transactions that we contemplate or have completed, such as receipt of proceeds, decreased expenses and avoided expenses and expenditures; and |
· |
statements of our expectations, beliefs, future plans and strategies, our targets, exploration activities, anticipated developments and other matters that are not historical facts. |
These statements may be made expressly in this document or may be incorporated by reference from other documents that we will file with the SEC. You can find many of these statements by looking for words such as “believes,” “expects,” “targets,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” or similar expressions used in this report or incorporated by reference in this report.
These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results to be materially different from any future results expressed or implied in those statements. Because the statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied. We caution you not to put undue reliance on these statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. Further, the information contained in this document or incorporated herein by reference is a statement of our present intention and is based on present facts and assumptions, which may change at any time and without notice, based on changes in such facts or assumptions.
Risk Factors Impacting Forward-Looking Statements
The important factors that could prevent us from achieving our stated goals and objectives include, but are not limited to, those set forth in other reports we have filed with the SEC, including our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 and the following:
· |
Changes in the worldwide price for gold and/or silver; |
· |
Volatility in the equities markets; |
· |
Adverse results from our exploration or production efforts; |
· |
Producing at rates lower than those targeted; |
· |
Political and regulatory risks; |
· |
Weather conditions, including unusually heavy rains; |
· |
Earthquakes or other unforeseen ground movements impacting mining or processing; |
21
· |
Failure to meet our revenue or profit goals or operating budget; |
· |
Decline in demand for our common stock; |
· |
Downward revisions in securities analysts’ estimates or changes in general market conditions; |
· |
Technological innovations by competitors or in competing technologies; |
· |
Investor perception of our industry or our prospects; |
· |
Lawsuits; |
· |
Actions by government central banks; and |
· |
General economic trends. |
We undertake no responsibility or obligation to update publicly these forward-looking statements, but may do so in the future in written or oral statements. Investors should take note of any future statements made by or on our behalf.
ITEM 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Our exposure to market risks includes, but is not limited to, the following risks: changes in commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates, provisional sales contract risks, changes in interest rates, equity price risks and country risk. We do not use derivative financial instruments as part of an overall strategy to manage market risk; however, we may consider such arrangements in the future as we evaluate our business and financial strategy.
Commodity Price Risk
The results of our operations depend in large part upon the market prices of gold and silver, and to a lesser extent on base metal prices of copper, lead and zinc. Gold and silver prices fluctuate widely and are affected by numerous factors beyond our control. The level of interest rates, the rate of inflation, the stability of exchange rates, the world supply of and demand for gold, silver and other metals, among other factors, can all cause significant fluctuations in commodity prices. Such external economic factors are in turn influenced by changes in international investment patterns, monetary systems and political developments. The price of gold and silver has fluctuated widely in recent years, and future price declines could cause a mineral project to become uneconomic, thereby having a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. We have not entered into derivative contracts to protect the selling price for gold or silver. We may in the future more actively manage our exposure through derivative contracts or other commodity price risk management programs, although we have no intention of doing so in the near-term.
In addition to adversely affecting our reserve estimates, results of operations and/or our financial condition, declining gold and silver prices could require a reassessment of the feasibility of a project. Even if a project is ultimately determined to be economically viable, the need to conduct such a reassessment may cause delays in the implementation of a project.
Foreign Currency Risk
Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations can increase or decrease our costs to the extent we pay costs in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. We are primarily impacted by Mexican peso rate changes relative to the U.S. Dollar. When the value of the peso rises in relation to the US Dollar, some of our costs in Mexico may increase, thus affecting our operating results. These fluctuations do not impact our revenues since we sell our metals in U.S. dollars. Future fluctuations may give rise to foreign currency exposure, which may affect our financial results.
We have not utilized market-risk sensitive instruments to manage our exposure to foreign currency exchange rates but may in the future actively manage our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk.
22
Provisional Sales Contract Risk
We enter into concentrate sales contracts with a third-party smelter. The contracts, in general, provide for a provisional payment based upon provisional assays and quoted metal prices. The provisionally priced sales contracts contain an embedded derivative that is required to be separated from the host contract for accounting purposes. The host contract is the receivable from the sale of concentrates determined at the average forward prices at the time of sale. The embedded derivative, which is the final settlement based on a future price, does not qualify for hedge accounting and is marked-to-market through operations each period prior to final settlement. Please see Note 11 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Interest Rate Risk
Our previous outstanding debt consisted of leased equipment classified as capital leases that were paid off during the quarter. Accordingly, we consider our interest rate risk exposure to be insignificant at this time.
Equity Price Risk
We have in the past sought and may in the future seek to acquire additional funding by sale of common stock and other equity. The price of our common stock has been volatile in the past and may also be volatile in the future. As a result, there is a risk that we may not be able to sell our common stock at an acceptable price should the need for new equity funding arise.
Country Risk
Our mining operations are located in Mexico. In the past, that country has been subject to political instability, increasing crime, legislative initiatives and changes and uncertainties which may cause changes to existing government regulations affecting mineral exploration and mining activities including taxes. Civil or political unrest or criminal activities could disrupt our operations at any time. Our exploration and mining activities may be adversely affected in varying degrees by changing government regulations relating to the mining industry or shifts in political conditions that could increase the costs related to our activities or maintaining our properties. Additionally, Mexico’s status as a developing country may make it more difficult for us to obtain required financing for our properties.
ITEM 4: Controls and Procedures
During the fiscal period covered by this report, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Effective January 1, 2016, we transitioned to a new Enterprise Resource Planning system. We have taken the necessary steps to monitor and maintain appropriate internal controls over financial reporting as it pertains to the general information technology control environment.
There were no other changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the first nine months of 2016 that has materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
23
financial reporting.
ITEM 2:Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a)In addition to information previously reported on a Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 18, 2016, related to an acquisition in which we issued shares as partial consideration, we completed an additional transaction in which we issued shares of common stock which were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”). On August 12, 2016, we acquired real property in Nevada from Nevada Select Royalty, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ely Gold and Minerals Inc. (a publicly traded corporation organized under the provincial laws of British Columbia) in exchange for 130,169 shares of common stock as partial consideration. At the time of issuance, the shares were valued at $6.53 per share, for an aggregate value of $0.9 million. We relied on the exemption from registration provided by Rule 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act in connection with this transaction.
In connection with the offer and sale of these shares, we did not engage in any general solicitation or advertising. We exercised reasonable care to ensure that the purchaser of securities was not an underwriter within the meaning of the Securities Act, including making reasonable inquiry prior to the transaction. The parties’ written agreement included disclosure regarding the restricted nature of the securities and detailed the restrictions on transfer of the shares, representations regarding the purchaser’s qualifications and investment intent with respect to the securities.
(c) |
In September 2011, our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase of up to $20.0 million with no pre-established end date. During the first nine months of 2016 we did not repurchase any shares of our common stock on the open market. |
The following exhibits are filed or furnished herewith:
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Descriptions |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Jason D. Reid. |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for John A. Labate. |
|
|
|
32* |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Jason D. Reid and John A. Labate. |
|
|
|
101 |
|
Financial statements from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gold Resource Corporation for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
*This document is not being “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section. Registration Statements or other documents filed with the SEC shall not incorporate this exhibit by reference, except as otherwise expressly stated in such filing.
24
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
GOLD RESOURCE CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: November 2, 2016 |
|
|
/s/ Jason D. Reid |
|
|
By: |
Jason D. Reid, |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: November 2, 2016 |
|
|
/s/ John A. Labate |
|
|
By: |
John A. Labate, |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
25
The following exhibits are filed or furnished herewith:
Exhibit |
|
Descriptions |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Jason D. Reid. |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for John A. Labate. |
|
|
|
32* |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Jason D. Reid and John A. Labate. |
|
|
|
101 |
|
Financial statements from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gold Resource Corporation for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
*This document is not being “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section. Registration Statements or other documents filed with the SEC shall not incorporate this exhibit by reference, except as otherwise expressly stated in such filing.
26