e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended July 4, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-4482
ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
New York
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
11-1806155
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
|
|
|
50 Marcus Drive, Melville, New York
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
11747
(Zip Code) |
(631) 847-2000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
No Changes
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web
site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer,
accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o
(do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
There were 119,630,955 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of July 24, 2009.
ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC.
INDEX
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
3,391,823 |
|
|
$ |
4,347,477 |
|
|
$ |
6,809,251 |
|
|
$ |
8,375,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
2,989,629 |
|
|
|
3,735,006 |
|
|
|
5,976,061 |
|
|
|
7,177,206 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
315,028 |
|
|
|
421,839 |
|
|
|
644,142 |
|
|
|
827,351 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
16,716 |
|
|
|
17,478 |
|
|
|
33,343 |
|
|
|
34,695 |
|
Restructuring and integration charge |
|
|
19,252 |
|
|
|
8,196 |
|
|
|
43,270 |
|
|
|
14,674 |
|
Preference claim from 2001 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
12,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,340,625 |
|
|
|
4,182,519 |
|
|
|
6,696,816 |
|
|
|
8,066,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
51,198 |
|
|
|
164,958 |
|
|
|
112,435 |
|
|
|
309,101 |
|
Equity in earnings of affiliated companies |
|
|
1,027 |
|
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
|
3,286 |
|
Interest and other financing expense, net |
|
|
17,082 |
|
|
|
24,129 |
|
|
|
40,117 |
|
|
|
49,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
35,143 |
|
|
|
141,761 |
|
|
|
73,668 |
|
|
|
263,186 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
14,061 |
|
|
|
45,418 |
|
|
|
25,850 |
|
|
|
80,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income |
|
|
21,082 |
|
|
|
96,343 |
|
|
|
47,818 |
|
|
|
182,248 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to shareholders |
|
$ |
21,097 |
|
|
$ |
96,215 |
|
|
$ |
47,838 |
|
|
$ |
182,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
.18 |
|
|
$ |
.79 |
|
|
$ |
.40 |
|
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
.18 |
|
|
$ |
.79 |
|
|
$ |
.40 |
|
|
$ |
1.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
119,783 |
|
|
|
121,379 |
|
|
|
119,675 |
|
|
|
122,078 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
120,317 |
|
|
|
122,157 |
|
|
|
120,042 |
|
|
|
122,996 |
|
See accompanying notes.
3
ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands except par value)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 (A) |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
908,427 |
|
|
$ |
451,272 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
2,536,391 |
|
|
|
3,087,290 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
1,359,258 |
|
|
|
1,626,559 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
193,709 |
|
|
|
180,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
4,997,785 |
|
|
|
5,345,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
25,021 |
|
|
|
25,127 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
145,772 |
|
|
|
147,138 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
757,523 |
|
|
|
698,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
928,316 |
|
|
|
870,421 |
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(479,244 |
) |
|
|
(459,881 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
449,072 |
|
|
|
410,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in affiliated companies |
|
|
49,930 |
|
|
|
46,788 |
|
Cost in excess of net assets of companies acquired |
|
|
901,998 |
|
|
|
905,848 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
404,777 |
|
|
|
409,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
6,803,562 |
|
|
$ |
7,118,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
2,185,400 |
|
|
$ |
2,459,922 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
342,530 |
|
|
|
455,547 |
|
Short-term borrowings, including current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
44,582 |
|
|
|
52,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
2,572,512 |
|
|
|
2,968,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,216,439 |
|
|
|
1,223,985 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
248,489 |
|
|
|
248,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $1: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized - 160,000 shares in 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued - 125,286 and 125,048 shares in 2009 and 2008, respectively |
|
|
125,286 |
|
|
|
125,048 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
1,041,066 |
|
|
|
1,035,302 |
|
Treasury stock (5,678 and 5,740 shares in 2009 and 2008,
respectively), at cost |
|
|
(186,307 |
) |
|
|
(190,273 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,618,843 |
|
|
|
1,571,005 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
190,504 |
|
|
|
172,528 |
|
Other |
|
|
(23,594 |
) |
|
|
(36,912 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
2,765,798 |
|
|
|
2,676,698 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
2,766,122 |
|
|
|
2,677,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
6,803,562 |
|
|
$ |
7,118,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
- |
Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation as
a result of the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160. See Note A
of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. |
See accompanying notes.
4
ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income |
|
$ |
47,818 |
|
|
$ |
182,248 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income to net cash provided by
operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
33,343 |
|
|
|
34,695 |
|
Amortization of stock-based compensation |
|
|
13,047 |
|
|
|
9,674 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs and discount on notes |
|
|
1,110 |
|
|
|
1,142 |
|
Equity in earnings of affiliated companies |
|
|
(1,350 |
) |
|
|
(3,286 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
17,667 |
|
|
|
(2,756 |
) |
Restructuring and integration charge |
|
|
32,193 |
|
|
|
10,088 |
|
Preference claim from 2001 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
7,822 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements |
|
|
2,157 |
|
|
|
(231 |
) |
Change in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquired businesses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
546,654 |
|
|
|
155,545 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
263,663 |
|
|
|
(127,723 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(8,773 |
) |
|
|
(14,201 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(253,465 |
) |
|
|
(157,095 |
) |
Accrued expenses |
|
|
(143,462 |
) |
|
|
59,227 |
|
Other |
|
|
(13,613 |
) |
|
|
(13,341 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
536,989 |
|
|
|
141,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(72,369 |
) |
|
|
(69,371 |
) |
Cash consideration paid for acquired businesses |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(273,114 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of facilities |
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other |
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
(208 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(71,488 |
) |
|
|
(342,693 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in short-term borrowings |
|
|
(7,389 |
) |
|
|
8,284 |
|
Repayment of revolving credit facility borrowings |
|
|
(29,400 |
) |
|
|
(1,424,650 |
) |
Proceeds from revolving credit facility borrowings |
|
|
29,280 |
|
|
|
1,543,677 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
2,834 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements |
|
|
(2,157 |
) |
|
|
231 |
|
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(2,145 |
) |
|
|
(102,661 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities |
|
|
(10,974 |
) |
|
|
27,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
2,628 |
|
|
|
9,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
457,155 |
|
|
|
(163,248 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
451,272 |
|
|
|
447,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
908,427 |
|
|
$ |
284,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
5
ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Note A Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Arrow Electronics, Inc. (the company or
Arrow) were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States and reflect all adjustments of a normal recurring nature, which are, in the opinion of
management, necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial position and results of
operations at and for the periods presented. The consolidated results of operations for the
interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.
The company evaluated subsequent events through July 29, 2009, the issuance date of these
consolidated financial statements.
These consolidated financial statements do not include all the information or notes necessary for a
complete presentation and, accordingly, should be read in conjunction with the companys Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended April 4, 2009, as well as the audited consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed in the companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Noncontrolling Interests
Effective January 1, 2009, the company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51
(Statement No. 160). Statement No. 160 requires that noncontrolling interests be reported as a
component of shareholders equity; net income attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling
interest be separately identified in the consolidated results of operations; changes in a parents
ownership interest be treated as equity transactions if control is maintained; and upon a loss of
control, any gain or loss on the interest be recognized in the consolidated results of operations.
Statement No. 160 also requires expanded disclosures to clearly identify and distinguish between
the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. The adoption of the
provisions of Statement No. 160 did not materially impact the companys consolidated financial
position and results of operations. Prior period amounts were reclassified to conform to the
current period presentation.
Quarter-end
During 2009, the company began operating on a revised quarterly reporting calendar that closes on
the Saturday following the end of the calendar quarter. The second quarter of 2009 includes the
period from April 5, 2009 through July 4, 2009. There were 63 shipping days for the second quarter
of 2009 and 64 shipping days for the second quarter of 2008. The first half of 2009 includes the
period from January 1, 2009 through July 4, 2009. There were 128 shipping days for both the first
half of 2009 and 2008.
Reclassification
Certain prior period amounts were reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
Note B Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Statement No. 166,
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (Statement
No. 166). Statement No. 166, among other things, eliminates the concept of a qualifying
special-purpose entity, changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and requires
additional
disclosures about transfers of financial assets. Statement No. 166 is effective for annual
reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009. The adoption of the provisions of Statement
No. 166 is not anticipated to impact the companys consolidated financial position and results of
operations.
6
ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(Unaudited)
In June 2009, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No.
(FIN) 46(R) (Statement No. 167). Statement No. 167, among other things, requires a
qualitative rather than a quantitative analysis to determine the primary beneficiary of a variable
interest entity (VIE), amends FIN 46(R)s consideration of related party relationships in the
determination of the primary beneficiary of a VIE, amends certain guidance in FIN 46(R) for
determining whether an entity is a VIE, requires continuous assessments of whether an enterprise is
the primary beneficiary of a VIE, and requires enhanced disclosures about an enterprises
involvement with a VIE. Statement No. 167 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning
after November 15, 2009. The company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the provisions
of Statement No. 167.
In June 2009, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification
(Codification) and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), a
replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 (Statement No. 168). Statement No. 168 establishes the
Codification as the single source of authoritative GAAP in the United States, other than rules and
interpretive releases issued by the SEC. The Codification is a reorganization of current GAAP into
a topical format that eliminates the current GAAP hierarchy and establishes instead two levels of
guidance authoritative and nonauthoritative. All non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting
literature that is not included in the Codification will become nonauthoritative. The FASBs
primary goal in developing the Codification is to simplify user access to all authoritative GAAP by
providing all the authoritative literature related to a particular accounting topic in one place.
The Codification will be effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.
As the Codification is not intended to change or alter existing GAAP, it is not anticipated to
impact the companys consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Note C Acquisitions
Effective January 1, 2009, the company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141
(revised 2007), Business Combinations (Statement No. 141(R)). Statement No. 141(R) requires,
among other things, the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize the fair value of
all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed; the recognition of acquisition-related costs in
the consolidated results of operations; the recognition of restructuring costs in the consolidated
results of operations for which the acquirer becomes obligated after the acquisition date; and
contingent purchase consideration to be recognized at their fair values on the acquisition date
with subsequent adjustments recognized in the consolidated results of operations. Statement No.
141(R) is applicable for all business combinations entered into after the date of adoption.
On June 2, 2008, the company acquired LOGIX S.A. (LOGIX), a subsidiary of Groupe OPEN for a
purchase price of $205,937, which included $15,508 of debt paid at closing, cash acquired of
$3,647, and acquisition costs. In addition, there was the assumption of $46,663 in debt. The
acquisition was accounted for as a purchase transaction and, accordingly, the results of operations
of LOGIX were included in the companys consolidated results from the date of acquisition within
the companys global enterprise computing solutions (ECS) business segment.
7
ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(Unaudited)
The following table summarizes the allocation of the net consideration paid to the fair value of
the assets acquired and liabilities assumed for the LOGIX acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
119,599 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
26,776 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
6,058 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
5,234 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets |
|
|
23,262 |
|
Cost in excess of net assets of companies acquired |
|
|
174,269 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(90,660 |
) |
Accrued expenses |
|
|
(6,878 |
) |
Debt (including short-term borrowings of $43,096) |
|
|
(46,663 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
(8,707 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration paid, net of cash acquired |
|
$ |
202,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
During the third quarter of 2008, the company completed its valuation of identifiable intangible
assets. The company allocated $21,401 of the purchase price to intangible assets relating to
customer relationships, with a useful life of 10 years, and $1,861 to other intangible assets
(consisting of non-competition agreements and sales backlog), with useful lives ranging from one to
two years.
The cost in excess of net assets of companies acquired related to the LOGIX acquisition is recorded
in the companys global ECS business segment. The intangible assets related to the LOGIX
acquisition are not expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.
The following table summarizes the companys unaudited consolidated results of operations for the
second quarter and first six months of 2008, as well as the unaudited pro forma consolidated
results of operations of the company, as though the LOGIX acquisition occurred on January 1, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
As Reported |
|
Pro Forma |
|
As Reported |
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
4,347,477 |
|
|
$ |
4,423,234 |
|
|
$ |
8,375,968 |
|
|
$ |
8,582,982 |
|
Net income attributable to shareholders |
|
|
96,215 |
|
|
|
92,011 |
|
|
|
182,086 |
|
|
|
174,123 |
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
.79 |
|
|
$ |
.76 |
|
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
.79 |
|
|
$ |
.75 |
|
|
$ |
1.48 |
|
|
$ |
1.42 |
|
The unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations does not purport to be indicative of the
results obtained if the LOGIX acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of 2008, or of those
results that may be obtained in the future.
Other
Amortization expense related to identifiable intangible assets was $3,852 and $7,676 for the second
quarter and first six months of 2009 and $3,749 and $7,555 for the second quarter and first six
months of 2008, respectively.
8
ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Note D Cost in Excess of Net Assets of Companies Acquired
Cost in excess of net assets of companies acquired, allocated to the companys business segments,
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components |
|
|
Global ECS |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
453,478 |
|
|
$ |
452,370 |
|
|
$ |
905,848 |
|
Acquisition-related adjustments |
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
(8,171 |
) |
|
|
(7,570 |
) |
Other (primarily foreign currency translation) |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
3,688 |
|
|
|
3,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
$ |
454,111 |
|
|
$ |
447,887 |
|
|
$ |
901,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the assets
acquired. The company tests goodwill for impairment annually as of the first day of the fourth
quarter, or more frequently if indicators of potential impairment exist.
Note E Investments in Affiliated Companies
The company owns a 50% interest in several joint ventures with Marubun Corporation (collectively
Marubun/Arrow) and a 50% interest in Altech Industries (Pty.) Ltd. (Altech Industries), a joint
venture with Allied Technologies Limited. These investments are accounted for using the equity
method.
The following table presents the companys investment in Marubun/Arrow, the companys investment
and long-term note receivable in Altech Industries, and the companys other equity investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Marubun/Arrow |
|
$ |
35,909 |
|
|
$ |
34,881 |
|
Altech Industries |
|
|
14,021 |
|
|
|
11,888 |
|
Other |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
49,930 |
|
|
$ |
46,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The equity in earnings (loss) of affiliated companies consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Marubun/Arrow |
|
$ |
806 |
|
|
$ |
987 |
|
|
$ |
919 |
|
|
$ |
2,765 |
|
Altech Industries |
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
602 |
|
Other |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,027 |
|
|
$ |
932 |
|
|
$ |
1,350 |
|
|
$ |
3,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under the terms of various joint venture agreements, the company is required to pay its pro-rata
share of the third party debt of the joint ventures in the event that the joint ventures are
unable to meet their obligations. At July 4, 2009, the companys pro-rata share of this debt was
approximately $2,400. The company believes there is sufficient equity in the joint ventures to
meet their obligations.
9
ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Note F Accounts Receivable
The company has a $600,000 asset securitization program collateralized by accounts receivables of
certain of its North American subsidiaries which expires in March 2010. The asset securitization
program is conducted through Arrow Electronics Funding Corporation, a wholly-owned, bankruptcy
remote
subsidiary. The asset securitization program does not qualify for sale treatment under FASB
Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments
of Liabilities. Accordingly, the accounts receivable and related debt obligation remain on the
companys consolidated balance sheet. The company had no outstanding borrowings under the asset
securitization program at July 4, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
Accounts receivable, net, consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
2,582,243 |
|
|
$ |
3,140,076 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(45,852 |
) |
|
|
(52,786 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
2,536,391 |
|
|
$ |
3,087,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the
inability of its customers to make required payments. The allowances for doubtful accounts are
determined using a combination of factors, including the length of time the receivables are
outstanding, the current business environment, and historical experience.
Note G Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
9.15% senior notes, due 2010 |
|
$ |
199,996 |
|
|
$ |
199,994 |
|
Bank term loan, due 2012 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
6.875% senior notes, due 2013 |
|
|
349,728 |
|
|
|
349,694 |
|
6.875% senior debentures, due 2018 |
|
|
198,136 |
|
|
|
198,032 |
|
7.5% senior debentures, due 2027 |
|
|
197,540 |
|
|
|
197,470 |
|
Cross-currency swap, due 2010 |
|
|
35,027 |
|
|
|
36,467 |
|
Cross-currency swap, due 2011 |
|
|
10,049 |
|
|
|
9,985 |
|
Interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges |
|
|
16,503 |
|
|
|
21,394 |
|
Other obligations with various interest rates and due dates |
|
|
9,460 |
|
|
|
10,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,216,439 |
|
|
$ |
1,223,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 7.5% senior debentures are not redeemable prior to their maturity. The 9.15% senior notes,
6.875% senior notes, and 6.875% senior debentures may be called at the option of the company
subject to make whole clauses.
10
ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(Unaudited)
The estimated fair market value is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.15% senior notes, due 2010 |
|
$ |
208,000 |
|
|
$ |
206,000 |
|
6.875% senior notes, due 2013 |
|
|
364,000 |
|
|
|
329,000 |
|
6.875% senior debentures, due 2018 |
|
|
192,000 |
|
|
|
160,000 |
|
7.5% senior debentures, due 2027 |
|
|
176,000 |
|
|
|
152,000 |
|
The carrying amount of the companys short-term borrowings, bank term loan, and other obligations
approximate their fair value.
The company had no outstanding borrowings under its $800,000 revolving credit facility at July 4,
2009 and December 31, 2008.
The revolving credit facility and the asset securitization program include terms and conditions
that limit the incurrence of additional borrowings, limit the companys ability to pay cash
dividends or repurchase stock, and require that certain financial ratios be maintained at
designated levels. The company was in compliance with all covenants as of July 4, 2009. The
company is currently not aware of any events that would cause non-compliance in the future.
Interest and other financing expense, net, includes interest income of $777 and $2,408 for the
second quarter and first six months of 2009 and $1,239 and $2,250 for the second quarter and first
six months of 2008, respectively.
Note H Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (Statement No.
157) defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to
transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Statement
No. 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of
observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Statement
No. 157 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 |
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at
the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or
liabilities. |
|
Level 2 |
|
Quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that
are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially
the full term of the asset or liability. |
|
Level 3 |
|
Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both
significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable. |
11
ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(Unaudited)
The following table presents assets/(liabilities) measured at fair value on a recurring basis at
July 4, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
42,345 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
42,345 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
15,392 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
15,392 |
|
Cross-currency swaps |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(45,076 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(45,076 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
42,345 |
|
|
$ |
(29,684 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
12,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents assets/(liabilities) measured at fair value on a recurring basis at
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
21,187 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
21,187 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
19,541 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
19,541 |
|
Cross-currency swaps |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(46,452 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(46,452 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,187 |
|
|
$ |
(26,911 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(5,724 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-For-Sale Securities
The company has a 2.7% equity ownership interest in WPG Holdings Co., Ltd. (WPG) and an 8.4%
equity ownership interest in Marubun Corporation (Marubun), which are accounted for as
available-for-sale securities.
The fair value of the companys available-for-sale securities is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Marubun |
|
|
WPG |
|
|
Marubun |
|
|
WPG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost basis |
|
$ |
10,016 |
|
|
$ |
10,798 |
|
|
$ |
10,016 |
|
|
$ |
10,798 |
|
Unrealized holding gain |
|
|
8,350 |
|
|
|
13,181 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
$ |
18,366 |
|
|
$ |
23,979 |
|
|
$ |
10,016 |
|
|
$ |
11,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of these investments are included in Other assets in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets, and the related unrealized holding gains and losses are included in
Other in the shareholders equity section in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
12
ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Derivative Instruments
The company uses various financial instruments, including derivative financial instruments, for
purposes other than trading. Derivatives used as part of the companys risk management strategy
are designated at inception as hedges and measured for effectiveness both at inception and on an
ongoing basis.
The fair values of derivative instruments in the consolidated balance sheet as of July 4, 2009 are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset/(Liability) Derivatives |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments designated as hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges |
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
16,503 |
|
Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
(1,111 |
) |
Cross-currency swaps designated as net investment hedges |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
(45,076 |
) |
Foreign exchange contracts designated as cash flow hedges |
|
Other assets |
|
|
763 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts designated as cash flow hedges |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
(946 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative instruments designated as hedging
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,867 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments not designated as hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Other assets |
|
|
2,433 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
(2,390 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative instruments not designated as
hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(29,824 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effect of derivative instruments on the consolidated statement of operations is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in |
|
|
|
Income on Derivatives |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps (a) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments not designated as hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts (b) |
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
(4,160 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(226 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,160 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 4, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ineffective |
|
|
|
Effective Portion |
|
|
Portion |
|
|
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Reclassified into |
|
|
Recognized in |
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps (c) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Foreign exchange contracts (d) |
|
|
(1,086 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(1,087 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cross-currency swaps (c) |
|
$ |
(10,590 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(10,590 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended July 4, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ineffective |
|
|
|
Effective Portion |
|
|
Portion |
|
|
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Reclassified into |
|
|
Recognized in |
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps (c) |
|
$ |
742 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Foreign exchange contracts (d) |
|
|
(2,445 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(1,703 |
) |
|
$ |
(49 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cross-currency swaps (c) |
|
$ |
1,376 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,376 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The amount of gain/(loss) recognized in income on derivatives is recorded in Interest and
other financing expense, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. |
|
(b) |
|
The amount of gain/(loss) recognized in income on derivatives is recorded in Cost of
products sold in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. |
|
(c) |
|
Both the effective and ineffective portions of any gain/(loss) reclassified or recognized in
income is recorded in Interest and other financing expense, net in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations. |
14
ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(d) |
|
Both the effective and ineffective portions of any gain/(loss) reclassified or recognized in
income is recorded in Cost of products sold in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations. |
Interest Rate Swaps
The company enters into interest rate swap transactions that convert certain fixed-rate debt to
variable-rate debt or variable-rate debt to fixed-rate debt in order to manage its targeted mix of
fixed- and floating-rate debt. The effective portion of the change in the fair value of interest
rate swaps designated as fair value hedges are recorded as a change to the carrying value of the
related hedged debt, and the effective portion of the change in fair value of interest rate swaps
designated as cash flow hedges are recorded in the shareholders equity section in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets in Other. The ineffective portion of the interest rate swap, if any,
is recorded in Interest and other financing expense, net in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations.
In December 2007 and January 2008, the company entered into a series of interest rate swaps (the
2007 and 2008 swaps) with a notional amount of $100,000. The 2007 and 2008 swaps modify the
companys interest rate exposure by effectively converting the variable rate (1.883% and 3.201% at
July 4, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively) on a portion of its $200,000 term loan to a fixed
rate of 4.457% per annum through December 2009. The 2007 and 2008 swaps are classified as cash
flow hedges and had a negative fair value of $1,111 and $1,853 at July 4, 2009 and December 31,
2008, respectively.
In June 2004, the company entered into a series of interest rate swaps (the 2004 swaps), with an
aggregate notional amount of $300,000. The 2004 swaps modify the companys interest rate exposure
by effectively converting the fixed 9.15% senior notes to a floating rate, based on the six-month
U.S. dollar LIBOR plus a spread (an effective rate of 6.10% and 8.19% at July 4, 2009 and December
31, 2008, respectively), and a portion of the fixed 6.875% senior notes to a floating rate also
based on the six-month U.S. dollar LIBOR plus a spread (an effective rate of 2.98% and 5.01% at
July 4, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively), through their maturities. The 2004 swaps are
classified as fair value hedges and had a fair value of $16,503 and $21,394 at July 4, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively.
Cross-Currency Swaps
The company enters into cross-currency swaps to hedge a portion of its net investment in
euro-denominated net assets. The companys cross-currency swaps are derivatives designated as net
investment hedges. The effective portion of the change in the fair value of derivatives designated
as net investment hedges is recorded in Foreign currency translation adjustment included in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets and any ineffective portion is recorded in Interest and
other financing expense, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. As the
notional amount of the companys cross-currency swaps are expected to equal a comparable amount of
hedged net assets, no material ineffectiveness is expected. The company uses the hypothetical
derivative method to assess the effectiveness of its net investment hedges on a quarterly basis.
In May 2006, the company entered into a cross-currency swap, with a maturity date of July 2011, for
approximately $100,000 or 78,281 (the 2006 cross-currency swap). The 2006 cross-currency swap
effectively converts the interest expense on $100,000 of long-term debt from U.S. dollars to euros.
The 2006 cross-currency swap had a negative fair value of $10,049 and $9,985 at July 4, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively.
In October 2005, the company entered into a cross-currency swap, with a maturity date of October
2010, for approximately $200,000 or 168,384 (the 2005 cross-currency swap). The 2005
cross-currency swap effectively converts the interest expense on $200,000 of long-term debt from
U.S. dollars to euros. The 2005 cross-currency swap had a negative fair value of $35,027 and
$36,467 at July 4, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
15
ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Foreign Exchange Contracts
The company enters into foreign exchange forward, option, or swap contracts (collectively, the
foreign exchange contracts) to mitigate the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
These contracts are executed to facilitate the hedging of foreign currency exposures resulting
from inventory purchases and sales and generally have terms of no more than six months. Gains or
losses on these contracts are deferred and recognized when the underlying future purchase or sale
is recognized or when the corresponding asset or liability is revalued. The company does not enter
into foreign exchange contracts for trading purposes. The risk of loss on a foreign exchange
contract is the risk of nonperformance by the counterparties, which the company minimizes by
limiting its counterparties to major financial institutions. The fair value of the foreign exchange
contracts is estimated using market quotes. The notional amount of the foreign exchange contracts
at July 4, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $330,733 and $315,021, respectively.
Note I Restructuring and Integration Charges
2009 Restructuring and Integration Charge
The company recorded restructuring and integration charges of $19,252 ($16,124 net of related taxes
or $.13 per share on both a basic and diluted basis) and $43,270 ($32,193 net of related taxes or
$.27 per share on both a basic and diluted basis) for the second quarter and first six months of
2009, respectively.
Included in the restructuring and integration charges for the second quarter and first six months
of 2009 are restructuring charges of $19,956 and $43,428, respectively, related to initiatives
taken by the company to improve operating efficiencies. These actions are expected to reduce costs
by approximately $80,000 per annum, with approximately $12,000 and $20,000 realized in the second
quarter and first six months of 2009, respectively. Also, included in the restructuring and
integration charges for the second quarter and first six months of 2009 are restructuring charges
of $368 and $1,002, respectively, and integration credits of $1,072 and $1,160, respectively,
related to adjustments to reserves established through restructuring and integration charges in
prior periods.
The following table presents the 2009 restructuring charge and activity in the restructuring
accrual for the first six months of 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Facilities |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charge |
|
$ |
39,439 |
|
|
$ |
3,676 |
|
|
$ |
313 |
|
|
$ |
43,428 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(21,369 |
) |
|
|
(957 |
) |
|
|
(263 |
) |
|
|
(22,589 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
$ |
18,106 |
|
|
$ |
2,955 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
21,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The restructuring charge of $43,428 for the first six months of 2009 primarily includes personnel
costs of $39,439 related to the elimination of approximately 760 positions within the companys
global components business segment and approximately 235 positions within the companys global ECS
business segment related to the companys continued focus on operational efficiency, and facilities
costs of $3,676, related to exit activities for ten vacated facilities worldwide due to the
companys continued efforts to streamline its operations and reduce real estate costs.
16
ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(Unaudited)
2008 Restructuring and Integration Charge
The company recorded restructuring and integration charges of $8,196 ($5,929 net of related taxes
or $.05 per share on both a basic and diluted basis) and $14,674 ($10,088 net of related taxes or
$.08 per share on both a basic and diluted basis) for the second quarter and first six months of
2008, respectively.
Included in the restructuring and integration charges for the second quarter and first six months
of 2008 are restructuring charges of $8,715 and $14,087, respectively, related to initiatives taken
by the company to make its organizational structure more efficient. Also included in the total
restructuring and integration charges for the second quarter and first six months of 2008 is a
restructuring credit of $426 and a restructuring charge of $207, respectively, related to
adjustments to reserves established through restructuring charges in prior periods and an
integration credit of $93 and an integration charge of $380, respectively, primarily related to the
ACI Electronics LLC and KeyLink Systems Group acquisitions.
The following table presents the activity in the restructuring accrual for the first six months of
2009 related to the 2008 restructuring:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Facilities |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
14,196 |
|
|
$ |
4,719 |
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
$ |
19,415 |
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,056 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(11,072 |
) |
|
|
(867 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(11,999 |
) |
Non-cash usage |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
(111 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
$ |
4,038 |
|
|
$ |
4,107 |
|
|
$ |
339 |
|
|
$ |
8,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring Accrual Related to Actions Taken Prior to 2008
The following table presents the activity in the restructuring accrual for the first six months of
2009 related to restructuring actions taken prior to 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Facilities |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
672 |
|
|
$ |
5,238 |
|
|
$ |
280 |
|
|
$ |
6,190 |
|
Restructuring charge (credit) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
Payments |
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
(994 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,301 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
$ |
364 |
|
|
$ |
4,834 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
5,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Integration
The following table presents the activity in the integration accrual for the first six months of
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Facilities |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
240 |
|
|
$ |
834 |
|
|
$ |
2,693 |
|
|
$ |
3,767 |
|
Integration credit |
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(953 |
) |
|
|
(1,160 |
) |
Payments |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(802 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(842 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
1,730 |
|
|
$ |
1,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and Integration Summary
In summary, the restructuring and integration accruals aggregate $36,559 at July 4, 2009, of which
$36,169 is expected to be spent in cash, and are expected to be utilized as follows:
|
|
The accruals for personnel costs of $22,511 to cover the termination of personnel are
primarily expected to be spent within one year. |
|
|
|
The accruals for facilities totaling $11,928 relate to vacated leased properties that have
scheduled payments of $2,337 in 2009, $3,694 in 2010, $2,182 in 2011, $1,522 in 2012, $1,561
in 2013, and $632 thereafter. |
|
|
|
Other accruals of $2,120 are expected to be utilized over several years. |
Note J Net Income per Share
The following table sets forth the calculation of net income per share on a basic and diluted basis
(shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to shareholders |
|
$ |
21,097 |
|
|
$ |
96,215 |
|
|
$ |
47,838 |
|
|
$ |
182,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic |
|
|
119,783 |
|
|
|
121,379 |
|
|
|
119,675 |
|
|
|
122,078 |
|
Net effect of various dilutive stock-based
compensation awards |
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
120,317 |
|
|
|
122,157 |
|
|
|
120,042 |
|
|
|
122,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
.18 |
|
|
$ |
.79 |
|
|
$ |
.40 |
|
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (a) |
|
$ |
.18 |
|
|
$ |
.79 |
|
|
$ |
.40 |
|
|
$ |
1.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Stock-based compensation awards for the issuance of 4,854 and 4,748 shares for the second
quarter and first six months of 2009 and 2,817 and 2,788 shares for the second quarter and
first six months of 2008, respectively, were excluded from the computation of net income per
share on a diluted basis as their effect is anti-dilutive. |
18
ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Note K Comprehensive Income
The components of comprehensive income are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income |
|
$ |
21,082 |
|
|
$ |
96,343 |
|
|
$ |
47,818 |
|
|
$ |
182,248 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments (a) |
|
|
58,118 |
|
|
|
2,881 |
|
|
|
17,976 |
|
|
|
140,390 |
|
Other (b) |
|
|
11,862 |
|
|
|
(2,166 |
) |
|
|
13,318 |
|
|
|
(5,327 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
91,062 |
|
|
|
97,058 |
|
|
|
79,112 |
|
|
|
317,311 |
|
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to
noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to
shareholders |
|
$ |
91,087 |
|
|
$ |
96,908 |
|
|
$ |
79,140 |
|
|
$ |
317,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Except for unrealized gains or losses resulting from the companys cross-currency swaps,
foreign currency translation adjustments were not tax effected as investments in international
affiliates are deemed to be permanent. |
|
(b) |
|
Other includes unrealized gains or losses on securities, unrealized gains or losses on
interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges, and other employee benefit plan items.
Each of these items is net of related taxes. |
Note L Employee Benefit Plans
The company maintains supplemental executive retirement plans and a defined benefit plan. The
components of the net periodic benefit costs for these plans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
July 4, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
442 |
|
|
$ |
647 |
|
|
$ |
884 |
|
|
$ |
1,291 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
2,244 |
|
|
|
2,151 |
|
|
|
4,488 |
|
|
|
4,302 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(1,266 |
) |
|
|
(1,715 |
) |
|
|
(2,532 |
) |
|
|
(3,430 |
) |
Amortization of unrecognized net loss |
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
1,752 |
|
|
|
909 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
Amortization of transition obligation |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit costs |
|
$ |
2,536 |
|
|
$ |
1,778 |
|
|
$ |
5,072 |
|
|
$ |
3,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note M Contingencies
Preference Claim From 2001
In March 2008, an opinion was rendered in a bankruptcy proceeding (Bridge Information Systems, et.
anno v. Merisel Americas, Inc. & MOCA) in favor of Bridge Information Systems (Bridge), the
estate of a
19
ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(Unaudited)
former global ECS customer that declared bankruptcy in 2001. The proceeding related to sales made
in 2000 and early 2001 by the MOCA division of ECS, a company Arrow purchased from Merisel Americas
in the fourth quarter of 2000. The court held that certain of the payments received by the company
at the time were preferential and must be returned to Bridge. Accordingly, in the first quarter of
2008, the company recorded a charge of $12,941 ($7,822 net of related taxes or $.06 per share on
both a basic and diluted basis), in connection with the preference claim from 2001, including legal
fees. This claim was appealed and subsequently settled for $10,890, including legal fees, and the
company recorded a credit of $2,051 ($1,246 net of related taxes or $.01 per share on both a basic
and diluted basis) in the fourth quarter of 2008.
Environmental and Related Matters
In 2000, the company assumed certain of the then outstanding obligations of Wyle Electronics
(Wyle), including Wyles obligation to indemnify the purchasers of its Laboratories division for
environmental clean-up costs associated with pre-1995 contamination or violation of environmental
regulations. Under the terms of the companys purchase of Wyle from the VEBA Group (VEBA), VEBA
agreed to indemnify the company for, among other things, costs related to environmental pollution
associated with Wyle, including those associated with Wyles sale of its Laboratories division.
The company is currently engaged in clean up and/or investigative activities at the Wyle sites in
Huntsville, Alabama and Norco, California.
Characterization of the extent of contaminated soil and groundwater continues at the site in
Huntsville, and approximately $2,000 was spent to date. The company currently estimates additional
investigative and related expenditures at the site of approximately $225 to $1,250, depending on
the results of which the cost of subsequent remediation is estimated to be between $2,500 and
$4,000.
At the Norco site, approximately $27,000 was expended to date on project management, regulatory
oversight, and investigative and feasibility study activities, providing the technical basis for a
final Remedial Investigation Report that was submitted to California oversight authorities during
the first quarter of 2008.
Remedial activities underway include the remediation of contaminated groundwater at certain areas
on the Norco site and of soil gas in a limited area immediately adjacent to the site, and a
hydraulic containment system that captures and treats groundwater before it moves into the adjacent
offsite area. Approximately $7,000 was spent on these activities to date, and it is anticipated
that these activities, along with the initial phases of the treatment of contaminated groundwater
offsite, will cost an additional $9,300 to $20,000.
The company currently estimates that the additional cost of project management and regulatory
oversight will range from $500 to $750. Ongoing remedial investigations (including costs related
to soil and groundwater investigations), and the preparation of a final remedial investigation
report are projected to cost between $400 to $750. Remaining Remedial Action Work Plan costs,
including a final report and the design of remedial measures, are estimated to cost approximately
$500.
Despite the amount of work undertaken and planned to date, the complete scope of work in connection
with the Norco site is not yet known, and, accordingly, the associated costs not yet determined.
In October 2005, the company filed suit against E.ON AG in the Frankfurt am Main Regional Court in
Germany. The suit seeks indemnification, contribution, and a declaration of the parties
respective rights and obligations in connection with the related litigation and other costs
associated with the Norco site. That action was stayed pending the resolution of jurisdictional
issues in the U.S. courts, and is now proceeding. In its answer to the companys claim filed in
March 2009 in the German proceedings, E.ON AG filed a counterclaim against the company for
approximately $16,000. The company is in the process of preparing a response to the counterclaim.
The company believes it has reasonable defenses to the counterclaim and plans to defend its
position vigorously. The company believes that the ultimate
20
ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(Unaudited)
resolution of the counterclaim will not have a material adverse impact on its consolidated
financial position, liquidity, or results of operations.
During the second quarter of 2009, the company entered into binding settlement agreements resolving
several of the lawsuits associated with the above-mentioned environmental liabilities (Gloria
Austin, et al. v. Wyle Laboratories, Inc. et al., the other claims of plaintiff Norco landowners
and residents which were consolidated with it, and an action by Wyle Laboratories, Inc. for defense
and indemnification in connection with the Austin and related cases). Arrows actions against E.ON
AG, successor to VEBA, for the judicial enforcement of the various indemnification provisions; and
Arrows claim against a number of insurers on policies relevant to the Wyle sites are ongoing and
unresolved. The litigation is described more fully in Note 15 and Item 3 of Part I of the companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
The company believes that the recovery of costs incurred to date associated with the environmental
clean-up costs related to the Norco and Huntsville sites is probable. Accordingly, the company
increased the receivable for indemnified amounts due from E.ON AG by $7,287 during the first six
months of 2009 to $40,906. The companys net costs for such indemnified matters may vary from
period to period as estimates of recoveries are not always recognized in the same period as the
accrual of estimated expenses.
Other
From time to time, in the normal course of business, the company may become liable with respect to
other pending and threatened litigation, environmental, regulatory, and tax matters. While such
matters are subject to inherent uncertainties, it is not currently anticipated that any such
matters will materially impact the companys consolidated financial position, liquidity, or results
of operations.
Note N Segment and Geographic Information
The company is a global provider of products, services, and solutions to industrial and commercial
users of electronic components and enterprise computing solutions. The company distributes
electronic components to original equipment manufacturers and contract manufacturers through its
global components business segment and provides enterprise computing solutions to value-added
resellers through its global ECS business segment. As a result of the companys philosophy of
maximizing operating efficiencies through the centralization of certain functions, selected fixed
assets and related depreciation, as well as borrowings, are not directly attributable to the
individual operating segments and are included in the corporate business segment.
21
ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Sales and operating income (loss), by segment, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global components |
|
$ |
2,271,570 |
|
|
$ |
2,958,201 |
|
|
$ |
4,616,582 |
|
|
$ |
5,880,444 |
|
Global ECS |
|
|
1,120,253 |
|
|
|
1,389,276 |
|
|
|
2,192,669 |
|
|
|
2,495,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
3,391,823 |
|
|
$ |
4,347,477 |
|
|
$ |
6,809,251 |
|
|
$ |
8,375,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global components |
|
$ |
57,993 |
|
|
$ |
147,053 |
|
|
$ |
134,091 |
|
|
$ |
307,631 |
|
Global ECS |
|
|
34,461 |
|
|
|
61,111 |
|
|
|
66,487 |
|
|
|
91,784 |
|
Corporate (a) |
|
|
(41,256 |
) |
|
|
(43,206 |
) |
|
|
(88,143 |
) |
|
|
(90,314 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
51,198 |
|
|
$ |
164,958 |
|
|
$ |
112,435 |
|
|
$ |
309,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes restructuring and integration charges of $19,252 and $43,270 for the second quarter
and first six months of 2009 and $8,196 and $14,674 for the second quarter and first six
months of 2008, respectively. Also, includes a charge of $12,941 related to the preference
claim from 2001 for the first six months of 2008. |
Total assets, by segment, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global components |
|
$ |
4,069,395 |
|
|
$ |
4,093,118 |
|
Global ECS |
|
|
1,865,541 |
|
|
|
2,325,095 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
868,626 |
|
|
|
700,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
6,803,562 |
|
|
$ |
7,118,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales, by geographic area, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America (b) |
|
$ |
1,623,677 |
|
|
$ |
2,160,461 |
|
|
$ |
3,197,824 |
|
|
$ |
4,185,189 |
|
EMEASA |
|
|
950,778 |
|
|
|
1,443,894 |
|
|
|
2,053,407 |
|
|
|
2,794,670 |
|
Asia/Pacific |
|
|
817,368 |
|
|
|
743,122 |
|
|
|
1,558,020 |
|
|
|
1,396,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
3,391,823 |
|
|
$ |
4,347,477 |
|
|
$ |
6,809,251 |
|
|
$ |
8,375,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Includes sales related to the United States of $1,468,604 and $2,892,269 for the second
quarter and first six months of 2009 and $1,995,589 and $3,858,710 for the second quarter and
first six months of 2008, respectively. |
22
ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Net property, plant and equipment, by geographic area, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America (c) |
|
$ |
367,541 |
|
|
$ |
324,385 |
|
EMEASA |
|
|
65,430 |
|
|
|
68,215 |
|
Asia/Pacific |
|
|
16,101 |
|
|
|
17,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
449,072 |
|
|
$ |
410,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Includes net property, plant and equipment related to the United States of $366,701 and
$323,561 at July 4, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. |
23
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
Overview
Arrow Electronics, Inc. (the company) is a global provider of products, services, and solutions
to industrial and commercial users of electronic components and enterprise computing solutions.
The company provides one of the broadest product offerings in the electronics components and
enterprise computing solutions distribution industries and a wide range of value-added services to
help customers reduce time to market, lower their total cost of ownership, introduce innovative
products through demand creation opportunities, and enhance their overall competitiveness. The
company has two business segments. The company distributes electronic components to original
equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and contract manufacturers (CMs) through its global components
business segment and provides enterprise computing solutions to value-added resellers (VARs)
through its global enterprise computing solutions (ECS) business segment. For the first six
months of 2009, approximately 68% of the companys sales were from the global components business
segment, and approximately 32% of the companys sales were from the global ECS business segment.
Operating efficiency and working capital management remain a key focus of the companys business
initiatives to grow sales faster than the market, grow profits faster than sales, and increase
return on invested capital. To achieve its financial objectives, the company seeks to capture
significant opportunities to grow across products, markets, and geographies. To supplement its
organic growth strategy, the company continually evaluates strategic acquisitions to broaden its
product offerings, increase its market penetration, and/or expand its geographic reach.
Investments needed to fund this growth are developed through continuous corporate-wide initiatives
to improve profitability and increase effective asset utilization.
On June 2, 2008, the company acquired LOGIX S.A. (LOGIX), a subsidiary of Groupe OPEN for a
purchase price of $205.9 million, which included $15.5 million of debt paid at closing, cash
acquired of $3.6 million, and acquisition costs. In addition, there was the assumption of $46.7
million in debt. Results of operations of LOGIX were included in the companys consolidated results
from the date of acquisition.
Consolidated sales for the second quarter of 2009 declined by 22.0%, compared with the year-earlier
period, due to a 19.4% decrease in the global ECS business segment and a 23.2% decrease in the
global components business segment. On a pro forma basis, which includes LOGIX as though this
acquisition occurred on January 1, 2008, consolidated sales decreased by 23.3%.
Net income attributable to shareholders decreased to $21.1 million in the second quarter of 2009,
compared with net income attributable to shareholders of $96.2 million in the year-earlier period.
The following items impacted the comparability of the companys results:
Second quarter of 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
restructuring and integration charges of $19.3 million ($16.1 million net of related
taxes) in 2009 and $8.2 million ($5.9 million net of related taxes) in 2008. |
First six months of 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
restructuring and integration charges of $43.3 million ($32.2 million net of related
taxes) in 2009 and $14.7 million ($10.1 million net of related taxes) in 2008; and |
|
|
|
|
a charge related to the preference claim from 2001 of $12.9 million ($7.8 million net of
related taxes) in 2008. |
Excluding the above-mentioned items, the decrease in net income attributable to shareholders for
the second quarter of 2009 was primarily the result of the sales declines in the global ECS business
segment and the more profitable global components businesses in North America and Europe, as well
as
24
competitive pricing pressure impacting gross profit margins. These decreases were offset, in
part, by a reduction in selling, general and administrative expenses due to the companys efforts
to streamline and simplify processes and to reduce expenses in response to the decline in sales due
to the worldwide economic recession, as well as a reduction in net interest and other financing
expense.
Substantially all of the companys sales are made on an order-by-order basis, rather than through
long-term sales contracts. As such, the nature of the companys business does not provide for the
visibility of material forward-looking information from its customers and suppliers beyond a few
months of forecast information.
Sales
Following is an analysis of net sales (in millions) by reportable segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 4, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Second Quarter Ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global components |
|
$ |
2,272 |
|
|
$ |
2,958 |
|
|
$ |
(686 |
) |
|
|
(23.2 |
)% |
Global ECS |
|
|
1,120 |
|
|
|
1,389 |
|
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
(19.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
3,392 |
|
|
$ |
4,347 |
|
|
$ |
(955 |
) |
|
|
(22.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global components |
|
$ |
4,616 |
|
|
$ |
5,880 |
|
|
$ |
(1,264 |
) |
|
|
(21.5 |
)% |
Global ECS |
|
|
2,193 |
|
|
|
2,496 |
|
|
|
(303 |
) |
|
|
(12.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
6,809 |
|
|
$ |
8,376 |
|
|
$ |
(1,567 |
) |
|
|
(18.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the global components business segment, sales for the second quarter and first six months of
2009 decreased primarily due to weakness in North America and Europe as a result of lower demand
for products due to the worldwide economic recession and the impact of a stronger U.S. dollar on
the translation of the companys international financial statements, offset, in part, by strength
in the Asia Pacific region. Excluding the impact of foreign currency, the companys global
components business segment sales decreased by 17.7% and 15.9% for the second quarter and first six
months of 2009, respectively.
In the global ECS business segment, the decrease in sales for the second quarter and first six
months of 2009 was primarily due to lower demand for products due to the worldwide economic
recession and the impact of a stronger U.S. dollar on the translation of the companys
international financial statements, offset, in part, by the LOGIX acquisition. On a pro forma
basis, which includes LOGIX as though this acquisition occurred on January 1, 2008, the global ECS
business segment sales for the second quarter and first six months of 2009 declined by 23.5% and
18.9%, respectively. Excluding the impact of foreign currency, the companys global ECS business
segment sales decreased by 16.3% and 9.2% for the second quarter and first six months of 2009,
respectively.
The translation of the companys international financial statements into U.S. dollars resulted in
decreased consolidated sales of $205.4 million and $405.1 million for the second quarter and first
six months of 2009, respectively, compared with the year-earlier periods, due to a stronger U.S.
dollar. Excluding the impact of foreign currency, the companys consolidated sales decreased by
17.3% and 13.9% for the second quarter and first six months of 2009, respectively.
Gross Profit
The company recorded gross profit of $402.2 million and $833.2 million in the second quarter and
first six months of 2009, respectively, compared with $612.5 million and $1.20 billion in the
year-earlier periods. The gross profit margin for the second quarter and first six months of 2009
decreased by approximately
25
220 and 210 basis points, respectively, compared with the year-earlier
periods. The decrease in gross profit was primarily due to increased competitive pricing pressure
in both the companys business segments, as well as a change in the mix in the companys business,
with the global ECS business segment and Asia Pacific region being a greater percentage of total
sales. The profit margins of products in the global ECS business segment are typically lower than
the profit margins of the products in the global components business segment, and the profit
margins of the components sold in the Asia Pacific region tend to be lower than the profit margins
in North America and Europe. The financial impact of the lower gross profit was offset, in part,
by the lower operating costs and lower working capital requirements in these businesses relative to
the companys other businesses.
Restructuring and Integration Charge
2009 Restructuring and Integration Charge
The company recorded restructuring and integration charges of $19.3 million ($16.1 million net of
related taxes or $.13 per share on both a basic and diluted basis) and $43.3 million ($32.2 million
net of related taxes or $.27 per share on both a basic and diluted basis) for the second quarter
and first six months of 2009, respectively.
Included in the restructuring and integration charges for the second quarter and first six months
of 2009 are restructuring charges of $20.0 million and
$43.4 million, respectively, related to initiatives taken
by the company to improve operating efficiencies. These actions are expected to reduce costs by
approximately $80.0 million per annum, with approximately $12.0 million and $20.0 million realized
in the second quarter and first six months of 2009, respectively.
Also, included in the
restructuring and integration charges for the second quarter and first six months of 2009 are
restructuring charges of $.4 million and $1.0 million, respectively, and integration credits of
$1.1 million and $1.2 million, respectively, related to adjustments to reserves established through
restructuring and integration charges in prior periods.
2008 Restructuring and Integration Charge
The company recorded restructuring and integration charges of $8.2 million ($5.9 million net of
related taxes or $.05 per share on both a basic and diluted basis) and $14.7 million ($10.1 million
net of related taxes or $.08 per share on both a basic and diluted basis) for the second quarter
and first six months of 2008, respectively.
Included in the restructuring and integration charges for the second quarter and first six months
of 2008 are restructuring charges of $8.7 million and $14.1 million, respectively, related to
initiatives taken by the company to make its organizational structure more efficient. Also
included in the total restructuring and integration charges for the second quarter and first six
months of 2008 is a restructuring credit of $.4 million and a restructuring charge of $.2 million,
respectively, related to adjustments to reserves established through restructuring charges in prior
periods and an integration credit of $.1 million and an integration charge of $.4 million,
respectively, primarily related to the ACI Electronics LLC and KeyLink Systems Group acquisitions.
Preference Claim From 2001
In March 2008, an opinion was rendered in a bankruptcy proceeding (Bridge Information Systems, et.
anno v. Merisel Americas, Inc. & MOCA) in favor of Bridge Information Systems (Bridge), the
estate of a former global ECS customer that declared bankruptcy in 2001. The proceeding related to
sales made in 2000 and early 2001 by the MOCA division of ECS, a company Arrow purchased from
Merisel Americas in the fourth quarter of 2000. The court held that certain of the payments
received by the company at the time were preferential and must be returned to Bridge. Accordingly,
during the first quarter of 2008, the company recorded a charge of $12.9 million ($7.8 million net of related taxes
or $.06 per share on both a basic and diluted basis), in connection with the preference claim from
2001, including legal fees.
26
Operating Income
The company recorded operating income of $51.2 million and $112.4 million in the second quarter and
first six months of 2009, respectively, as compared with operating income of $165.0 million and
$309.1 million in the year-earlier periods. Included in operating income for the second quarter
and first six months of 2009 were the previously discussed restructuring and integration charges of
$19.3 million and $43.3 million, respectively. Included in operating income for the second quarter
and first six months of 2008 were the previously discussed restructuring and integration charges of
$8.2 million and $14.7 million, respectively, and a charge related to the preference claim from
2001 of $12.9 million for the first six months of 2008.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $106.8 million, or 25.3%, in the second
quarter of 2009 on a sales decrease of 22.0% compared with the second quarter of 2008, and $183.2
million, or 22.1%, for the first six months of 2009 on a sales decrease of 18.7% compared with the
first six months of 2008. The dollar decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was
primarily due to the companys efforts to streamline and simplify processes and to reduce expenses
in response to the decline in sales, as well as the impact of foreign exchange rates. This was
offset, in part, by selling, general and administrative expenses incurred by LOGIX which was
acquired in June 2008. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales were
9.3% and 9.7% for the second quarters of 2009 and 2008 and 9.5% and 9.9% for the first six months
of 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Interest and Other Financing Expense
Net interest and other financing expense decreased by $7.0 million, or 29.2%, and $9.1 million, or
18.5% in the second quarter and first six months of 2009, respectively, primarily due to lower
interest rates on the companys variable rate debt and lower average debt outstanding, compared
with the year-earlier periods.
Income Taxes
The company recorded a provision for income taxes of $14.1 million and $25.9 million (an effective
tax rate of 40.0% and 35.1%) for the second quarter and first six months of 2009, respectively.
The companys provision for income taxes and effective tax rate for the second quarter and first
six months of 2009 was impacted by the previously discussed restructuring and integration charges.
Excluding the impact of the previously discussed restructuring and integration charges, the
companys effective tax rate for both the second quarter and first six months of 2009 was 31.6%.
The company recorded a provision for income taxes of $45.4 million and $80.9 million (an effective
tax rate of 32.0% and 30.8%) for the second quarter and first six months of 2008, respectively.
The companys provision for income taxes and effective tax rate for the second quarter and first
six months of 2008 was impacted by the previously discussed restructuring and integration charges,
and the first six months of 2008 was also impacted by the previously discussed preference claim
from 2001. Excluding the impact of the previously discussed restructuring and integration charges
and preference claim from 2001, the companys effective tax rate for the second quarter and first
six months of 2008 was 31.8% and 31.2%, respectively.
The companys provision for income taxes and effective tax rate is impacted by, among other
factors, the statutory tax rates in the countries in which it operates and the related level of
income generated by these operations.
Net Income Attributable to Shareholders
The company recorded net income attributable to shareholders of $21.1 million and $47.8 million in
the second quarter and first six months of 2009, respectively, compared with net income
attributable to shareholders of $96.2 million and $182.1 million in the year-earlier periods.
Included in net income attributable to shareholders for the second quarter and first six months of
2009 were the previously discussed restructuring and integration charges of $16.1 million and $32.2
million, respectively. Included
27
in net income attributable to shareholders for the second quarter
and first six months of 2008 were the previously discussed restructuring and integration charges of
$5.9 million and $10.1 million, respectively. Also included in net income for the first six
months of 2008 was the previously discussed charge related to the preference claim from 2001 of
$7.8 million. Excluding the above-mentioned items, the decrease in net income attributable to
shareholders was primarily the result of the sales declines in the global ECS business segment and
the more profitable global components businesses in North America and Europe, as well as
competitive pricing pressure impacting gross profit margins. These decreases were offset, in part,
by a reduction in selling, general and administrative expenses due to the companys efforts to
streamline and simplify processes and to reduce expenses in response to the decline in sales due to
the worldwide economic recession, as well as a reduction in net interest and other financing
expense.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At July 4, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the company had cash and cash equivalents of $908.4 million
and $451.3 million, respectively.
During the first six months of 2009, the net amount of cash provided by the companys operating
activities was $537.0 million, the net amount of cash used for investing activities was $71.5
million, and the net amount of cash used for financing activities was $11.0 million. The effect of
exchange rate changes on cash was an increase of $2.6 million.
During the first six months of 2008, the net amount of cash provided by the companys operating
activities was $141.8 million, the net amount of cash used for investing activities was $342.7
million, and the net amount of cash provided by financing activities was $27.7 million. The effect
of exchange rate changes on cash was an increase of $9.9 million.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
The company maintains a significant investment in accounts receivable and inventories. As a
percentage of total assets, accounts receivable and inventories were approximately 57.3% and 66.2%
at July 4, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
The net amount of cash provided by the companys operating activities during the first six months
of 2009 was $537.0 million primarily due to earnings from operations, adjusted for non-cash items,
and a reduction in accounts receivable and inventory, offset, in part, by a decrease in accounts
payable and accrued expenses.
The net amount of cash provided by the companys operating activities during the first six months
of 2008 was $141.8 million primarily due to earnings from operations, adjusted for non-cash items,
a reduction in accounts receivable and an increase in accrued expenses, offset, in part, by an
increase in inventory and a decrease in accounts payable.
Working capital as a percentage of sales was 12.6% in the second quarter of 2009 compared with
15.5% in the second quarter of 2008.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
The net amount of cash used for investing activities during the first six months of 2009 was $71.5
million, primarily reflecting $72.4 million for capital expenditures, which includes $51.3 million
of capital expenditures related to the companys global enterprise resource planning (ERP)
initiative, offset, in part, by proceeds from the sale of facilities of $1.2 million.
The net amount of cash used for investing activities during the first six months of 2008 was $342.7
million, primarily reflecting $273.1 million of cash consideration paid for acquired businesses and
$69.4 million for capital expenditures, which includes $45.9 million of capital expenditures
related to the companys global ERP initiative.
28
During the first six months of 2008, the company acquired Hynetic Electronics and Shreyanics
Electronics, a franchise components distribution business in India, ACI Electronics LLC, a
distributor of electronic components used in defense and aerospace applications, and LOGIX, a
leading value-added distributor of mid-range servers, storage, and software, for aggregate cash
consideration of $264.4 million. In addition, the company made a payment of $8.7 million to
increase its ownership interest in Ultra Source Technology Corp. from 92.8% to 100%.
During 2006, the company initiated a global ERP effort to standardize processes worldwide and adopt
best-in-class capabilities. Implementation is expected to be phased-in over the next several
years. For the full year 2009, the estimated cash flow impact of this initiative is expected to be
in the $80 to $100 million range with the impact decreasing by approximately $50 million in 2010.
The company expects to finance these costs with cash flows from operations.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
The net amount of cash used for financing activities during the first six months of 2009 was $11.0
million. The primary use of cash for financing activities during the first six months of 2009
included a $7.4 million decrease in short-term borrowings, a $2.2 million shortfall in tax benefits
from stock-based compensation arrangements, and $2.1 million of repurchases of common stock. The
primary source of cash from financing activities was $.8 million of proceeds from the exercise of
stock options.
The net amount of cash provided by financing activities during the first six months of 2008 was
$27.7 million. The primary source of cash from financing activities during the first six months of
2008 included $119.0 million of net borrowings of long-term debt (including net proceeds of $109.0
million under the revolving credit facility and $10.0 million under the asset securitization
program), an $8.3 million increase in short-term borrowings, and $2.8 million of cash proceeds from
the exercise of stock options. The primary use of cash during the first six months of 2008 was
$102.7 million of repurchases of common stock.
The company has an $800.0 million revolving credit facility with a group of banks that matures in
January 2012. Interest on borrowings under the revolving credit facility is calculated using a
base rate or a euro currency rate plus a spread based on the companys credit ratings (.425% at
July 4, 2009). The facility fee related to the credit facility is .125%.
The company has a $600.0 million asset securitization program collateralized by accounts receivable
of certain of its North American subsidiaries which expires in March 2010. Interest on borrowings
is calculated using a base rate or a commercial paper rate plus a spread, which is based on the
companys credit ratings (.225% at July 4, 2009). The facility fee is .125%.
The company had no outstanding borrowings under its revolving credit facility or asset
securitization program at July 4, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The revolving credit facility and
the asset securitization program include terms and conditions that limit the incurrence of
additional borrowings, limit the companys ability to pay cash dividends or repurchase stock, and
require that certain financial ratios be maintained at designated levels. The company was in
compliance with all covenants as of July 4, 2009. The company is currently not aware of any events that would cause non-compliance in the
future.
Contractual Obligations
The company has contractual obligations for long-term debt, interest on long-term debt, capital
leases, operating leases, purchase obligations, and certain other long-term liabilities that were
summarized in a table of Contractual Obligations in the companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008. Since December 31, 2008, there were no material changes to the
contractual obligations of the company, outside of the ordinary course of the companys business.
29
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The company has no off-balance sheet financing or unconsolidated special purpose entities.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The companys consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements
requires the company to make significant estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts
of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. The company evaluates its estimates on an ongoing basis. The company bases its
estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed reasonable
under the circumstances; the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the
carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual
results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
There were no significant changes during the first six months of 2009 to the items disclosed as
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations in the companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
See Note B of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a full description of recent
accounting pronouncements, including the anticipated dates of adoption and the effects on the
companys consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Information Relating to Forward-Looking Statements
This report includes forward-looking statements that are subject to numerous assumptions, risks,
and uncertainties, which could cause actual results or facts to differ materially from such
statements for a variety of reasons, including, but not limited to: industry conditions, the
companys implementation of its new enterprise resource planning system, changes in product supply,
pricing and customer demand, competition, other vagaries in the global components and global ECS
markets, changes in relationships with key suppliers, increased profit margin pressure, the effects
of additional actions taken to become more efficient or lower costs, and the companys ability to
generate additional cash flow. Forward-looking statements are those statements, which are not
statements of historical fact. These forward-looking statements can be identified by
forward-looking words such as expects, anticipates, intends, plans, may, will,
believes, seeks, estimates, and similar expressions. Shareholders and other readers are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of
the date on which they are made. The company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise
any of the forward-looking statements.
30
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
There were no material changes in market risk for changes in foreign currency exchange rates and
interest rates from the information provided in Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
About Market Risk in the companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008,
except as follows:
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
The notional amount of the foreign exchange contracts at July 4, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was
$330.7 million and $315.0 million, respectively. The fair values of foreign exchange contracts,
which are nominal, are estimated using market quotes. The translation of the financial statements
of the non-United States operations is impacted by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.
The change in consolidated sales and operating income was impacted by the translation of the
companys international financial statements into U.S. dollars. This resulted in decreased sales
of $405.1 million and decreased operating income of $21.6 million for the first six months of 2009,
compared with the year-earlier period, based on 2008 sales and operating income at the average rate
for 2009. Sales and operating income would decrease by $203.6 million and $.3 million,
respectively, if average foreign exchange rates declined by 10% against the U.S. dollar in the
first six months of 2009. This amount was determined by considering the impact of a hypothetical
foreign exchange rate on the sales and operating income of the companys international operations.
In May 2006, the company entered into a cross-currency swap, with a maturity date of July 2011, for
approximately $100.0 million or 78.3 million (the 2006 cross-currency swap) to hedge a portion
of its net investment in euro-denominated net assets. The 2006 cross-currency swap is designated
as a net investment hedge and effectively converts the interest expense on $100.0 million of
long-term debt from U.S. dollars to euros. As the notional amount of the 2006 cross-currency swap
is expected to equal a comparable amount of hedged net assets, no material ineffectiveness is
expected. The 2006 cross-currency swap had a negative fair value of $10.0 million at both July 4,
2009 and December 31, 2008.
In October 2005, the company entered into a cross-currency swap, with a maturity date of October
2010, for approximately $200.0 million or 168.4 million (the 2005 cross-currency swap) to hedge
a portion of its net investment in euro-denominated net assets. The 2005 cross-currency swap is
designated as a net investment hedge and effectively converts the interest expense on $200.0
million of long-term debt from U.S. dollars to euros. As the notional amount of the 2005
cross-currency swap is expected to equal a comparable amount of hedged net assets, no material
ineffectiveness is expected. The 2005 cross-currency swap had a negative fair value of $35.0
million and $36.5 million at July 4, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Interest Rate Risk
At July 4, 2009, approximately 60% of the companys debt was subject to fixed rates, and 40% of its
debt was subject to floating rates. A one percentage point change in average interest rates would
not materially impact net interest and other financing expense in the second quarter of 2009. This
was determined by considering the impact of a hypothetical interest rate on the companys average
floating rate on investments and outstanding debt. This analysis does not consider the effect of
the level of overall economic activity that could exist. In the event of a change in the level of
economic activity, which may adversely impact interest rates, the company could likely take actions
to further mitigate any potential negative exposure to the change. However, due to the uncertainty
of the specific actions that might be taken and their possible effects, the sensitivity analysis
assumes no changes in the companys financial structure.
In December 2007 and January 2008, the company entered into a series of interest rate swaps (the
2007 and 2008 swaps) with a notional amount of $100.0 million. The 2007 and 2008 swaps modify
the companys interest rate exposure by effectively converting the variable rate (1.883% and 3.201%
at July 4, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively) on a portion of its $200.0 million term loan to a
fixed rate of 4.457% per annum through December 2009. The 2007 and 2008 swaps are classified as
cash flow
31
hedges and had a negative fair value of $1.1 million and $1.9 million at July 4, 2009 and December
31, 2008, respectively.
In June 2004, the company entered into a series of interest rate swaps (the 2004 swaps), with an
aggregate notional amount of $300.0 million. The 2004 swaps modify the companys interest rate
exposure by effectively converting the fixed 9.15% senior notes to a floating rate, based on the
six-month U.S. dollar LIBOR plus a spread (an effective rate of 6.10% and 8.19% at July 4, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively), and a portion of the fixed 6.875% senior notes to a floating rate
also based on the six-month U.S. dollar LIBOR plus a spread (an effective rate of 2.98% and 5.01%
at July 4, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively), through their maturities. The 2004 swaps are
classified as fair value hedges and had a fair value of $16.5 million and $21.4 million at July 4,
2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
32
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Companys management, under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of
July 4, 2009 (the Evaluation). Based upon the Evaluation, the Companys Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the companys internal control over financial reporting or in other
factors that materially affect, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys
internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this quarterly report.
33
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
There were no material changes to the companys risk factors as discussed in Item 1A Risk Factors
in the companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
The following table shows the share-repurchase activity for the quarter ended July 4, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Value of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
that May Yet be |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Average Price Paid |
|
Part of Publicly |
|
Purchased Under the |
Month |
|
Shares Purchased |
|
per Share |
|
Announced Program |
|
Program |
April 5 through 30, 2009 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
May 1 through 31, 2009 |
|
|
3,124 |
|
|
$ |
22.94 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
June 1 through July 4, 2009 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The purchases of Arrow common stock noted above reflect shares that were withheld from employees
upon the vesting of restricted stock, as permitted by the plan, in order to satisfy the required
tax withholding obligations. None of these purchases were made pursuant to a publicly announced
repurchase plan and the Company does not currently have a stock repurchase plan in place.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
(a) The companys Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on May 1, 2009 (the Annual Meeting).
(b) The matters voted upon at the Annual Meeting and the results of the voting were as follows:
|
(i) |
|
The following individuals were elected by the shareholders to serve as Directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board Member |
|
In Favor |
|
Withheld |
Daniel W. Duval |
|
|
111,272,782 |
|
|
|
1,420,805 |
|
Gail E. Hamilton |
|
|
112,107,351 |
|
|
|
586,236 |
|
John N. Hanson |
|
|
111,300,722 |
|
|
|
1,392,865 |
|
Richard S. Hill |
|
|
106,390,890 |
|
|
|
6,302,697 |
|
M. F. (Fran) Keeth |
|
|
112,150,738 |
|
|
|
542,849 |
|
Roger King |
|
|
111,672,782 |
|
|
|
1,020,805 |
|
Michael J. Long |
|
|
111,539,036 |
|
|
|
1,154,551 |
|
William E. Mitchell |
|
|
111,009,079 |
|
|
|
1,684,508 |
|
Stephen C. Patrick |
|
|
63,899,446 |
|
|
|
48,794,141 |
|
Barry W. Perry |
|
|
111,276,836 |
|
|
|
1,416,751 |
|
John C. Waddell |
|
|
70,947,469 |
|
|
|
41,746,118 |
|
34
|
(ii) |
|
The appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the companys independent registered public
accounting firm was voted upon as follows: 111,981,030 shares in favor; 652,445 shares
against; and 60,112 shares abstaining. |
35
Item 6. Exhibits.
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
31(i)
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31(ii)
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32(i)
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32(ii)
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
36
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC.
|
|
Date: July 29, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Paul J. Reilly
|
|
|
|
Paul J. Reilly |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Finance and
Operations,
and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
37