e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
|
|
For the transition period from to |
Commission File Number 1-5823
CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
36-6169860 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
333 S. Wabash |
|
|
Chicago, Illinois
|
|
60604 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(312) 822-5000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at April 29, 2010 |
|
|
|
Common Stock, Par value $2.50
|
|
269,074,878 |
CNA Financial Corporation
Index
CNA Financial Corporation
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
(In millions, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earned premiums |
|
$ |
1,615 |
|
|
$ |
1,672 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
Net realized investment gains (losses), net of participating policyholders interests: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairment losses |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
(614 |
) |
Portion of other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in Other comprehensive
income |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in earnings |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(614 |
) |
Other net realized investment gains |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses), net of participating policyholders interests |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
(532 |
) |
Other revenues |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
2,315 |
|
|
|
1,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims, Benefits and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance claims and policyholders benefits |
|
|
1,308 |
|
|
|
1,342 |
|
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs |
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
Interest |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total claims, benefits and expenses |
|
|
1,958 |
|
|
|
1,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax |
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
(335 |
) |
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income tax (expense) benefit of $0 and $0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to CNA |
|
$ |
245 |
|
|
$ |
(195 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Attributable to CNA Common Stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to CNA |
|
$ |
245 |
|
|
$ |
(195 |
) |
Dividends on 2008 Senior Preferred |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to CNA common stockholders |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
(226 |
) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to CNA common stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) attributable to CNA common stockholders |
|
$ |
220 |
|
|
$ |
(226 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited).
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
(In millions, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share Attributable to CNA Common Stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to CNA common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
|
$ |
(0.84 |
) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to CNA common stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to CNA common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
|
$ |
(0.84 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Outstanding Common Stock and Common Stock Equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
269.1 |
|
|
|
269.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
269.2 |
|
|
|
269.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements
(Unaudited).
4
CNA Financial Corporation
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments with other-than-temporary impairments |
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on other investments |
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments |
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on discontinued operations and other |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
Pension and postretirement benefits |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Allocation to participating policyholders |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized (gains) losses on investments attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Pension and postretirement benefits attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income attributable to CNA |
|
$ |
559 |
|
|
$ |
193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited).
5
CNA Financial Corporation
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
(In millions, except share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities at fair value (amortized cost of $37,185 and $35,602) |
|
$ |
37,711 |
|
|
$ |
35,612 |
|
Equity securities at fair value (cost of $651 and $633) |
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
644 |
|
Limited partnership investments |
|
|
1,947 |
|
|
|
1,787 |
|
Other invested assets |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Short term investments |
|
|
2,484 |
|
|
|
3,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
|
42,826 |
|
|
|
41,996 |
|
Cash |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
Reinsurance receivables (less allowance for uncollectible receivables of $350 and $351) |
|
|
6,328 |
|
|
|
6,581 |
|
Insurance receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $197 and $202) |
|
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
1,656 |
|
Accrued investment income |
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
Deferred acquisition costs |
|
|
1,109 |
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
1,333 |
|
Property and equipment at cost (less accumulated depreciation of $511 and $498) |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,188 |
|
|
|
1,144 |
|
Separate account business |
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
55,679 |
|
|
$ |
55,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance reserves: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claim and claim adjustment expenses |
|
$ |
26,559 |
|
|
$ |
26,816 |
|
Unearned premiums |
|
|
3,283 |
|
|
|
3,274 |
|
Future policy benefits |
|
|
8,090 |
|
|
|
7,981 |
|
Policyholders funds |
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
Participating policyholders funds |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Long term debt |
|
|
2,304 |
|
|
|
2,303 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
3,046 |
|
|
|
3,087 |
|
Separate account business |
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
43,955 |
|
|
|
44,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes D, E, G, H, and J) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock (12,500,000 shares authorized) 2008 Senior Preferred (no
par value; $100,000 stated value; 10,000 shares issued and outstanding held by Loews
Corporation) |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
Common stock ($2.50 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized; 273,040,243 shares
issued; and 269,074,878 and 269,026,759 shares outstanding) |
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
2,198 |
|
|
|
2,177 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
7,484 |
|
|
|
7,264 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(325 |
) |
Treasury stock (3,965,365 and 4,013,484 shares), at cost |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
(109 |
) |
Notes receivable for the issuance of common stock |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total CNA stockholders equity |
|
|
11,217 |
|
|
|
10,660 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
11,724 |
|
|
|
11,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
55,679 |
|
|
$ |
55,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited).
6
CNA Financial Corporation
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
255 |
|
|
$ |
(185 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
(139 |
) |
Trading portfolio activity |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Net realized investment (gains) losses, net of participating
policyholders interests |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
532 |
|
Equity method investees |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
Amortization of investments |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
Depreciation |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
Accrued investment income |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
Deferred acquisition costs |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Insurance reserves |
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
(139 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by operating activities-continuing operations |
|
$ |
369 |
|
|
$ |
196 |
|
Net cash flows used by operating activities-discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by operating activities-total |
|
$ |
364 |
|
|
$ |
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of fixed maturity securities |
|
$ |
(5,351 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,079 |
) |
Proceeds from fixed maturity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
2,737 |
|
|
|
7,046 |
|
Maturities, calls and redemptions |
|
|
846 |
|
|
|
827 |
|
Purchases of equity securities |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of equity securities |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
Change in short term investments |
|
|
1,474 |
|
|
|
(1,041 |
) |
Change in other investments |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
55 |
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows used by investing activities-continuing operations |
|
$ |
(374 |
) |
|
$ |
(159 |
) |
Net cash flows provided by investing activities-discontinued operations |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows used by investing activities-total |
|
$ |
(369 |
) |
|
$ |
(150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited).
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid to Loews Corporation for 2008 Senior Preferred |
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
|
$ |
(31 |
) |
Policyholders investment contract net deposits (withdrawals) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows used by financing activities-continuing operations |
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
Net cash flows provided (used) by financing activities-discontinued operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows used by financing activities-total |
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash-continuing operations |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, beginning of year |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, end of period |
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash-continuing operations |
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
Cash-discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash-total |
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited).
8
CNA Financial Corporation
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning and end of period |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning and end of period |
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Paid-in Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
2,177 |
|
|
|
2,174 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
Other |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
2,198 |
|
|
|
2,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
7,264 |
|
|
|
6,845 |
|
Dividends paid to Loews Corporation for 2008 Senior Preferred |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
Net income (loss) attributable to CNA |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
7,484 |
|
|
|
6,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
(325 |
) |
|
|
(3,924 |
) |
Other comprehensive income attributable to CNA |
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(3,536 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(109 |
) |
Stock based compensation |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes Receivable for the Issuance of Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
Decrease in notes receivable for the issuance of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total CNA Stockholders Equity |
|
|
11,217 |
|
|
|
7,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling Interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
Net income |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Other |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity |
|
$ |
11,724 |
|
|
$ |
7,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited).
9
CNA Financial Corporation
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note A. Basis of Presentation
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) include the accounts of CNA Financial
Corporation (CNAF) and its controlled subsidiaries. Collectively, CNAF and its subsidiaries are
referred to as CNA or the Company. CNAs property and casualty and remaining life and group
insurance operations are primarily conducted by Continental Casualty Company (CCC), The Continental
Insurance Company (CIC), Continental Assurance Company (CAC) and CNA Surety Corporation (CNA
Surety). The Company owned approximately 62% of the outstanding common stock of CNA Surety as of
March 31, 2010. Loews Corporation (Loews) owned approximately 90% of the outstanding common stock
of CNAF as of March 31, 2010.
The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). Certain financial
information that is normally included in annual financial statements, including certain financial
statement notes, prepared in accordance with GAAP, is not required for interim reporting purposes
and has been condensed or omitted. These statements should be read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in CNAFs Form 10-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the year ended December 31, 2009. The preparation of
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual
results may differ from those estimates.
The interim financial data as of March 31, 2010 and for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009 is unaudited. However, in the opinion of management, the interim data includes all
adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair statement of the
Companys results for the interim periods. The results of operations for the interim periods are
not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. All significant
intercompany amounts have been eliminated.
Note B. Accounting Standards Updates
Adopted
Variable Interest Entities
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued updated accounting guidance
which amended the requirements for determination of the primary beneficiary of a variable interest
entity, required an ongoing assessment of whether an entity is the primary beneficiary and required
enhanced interim and annual disclosures. The updated accounting guidance was effective for annual
reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009, except for investment company type entities
for which the requirements under this guidance have been deferred indefinitely. The adoption of
this updated accounting guidance as of January 1, 2010 had no impact on the Companys financial
condition or results of operations.
Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
In April 2009, the FASB issued updated accounting guidance, which amended the other-than-temporary
impairment (OTTI) loss model for fixed maturity securities. A fixed maturity security is impaired
if the fair value of the security is less than its amortized cost basis, which is its cost adjusted
for accretion, amortization and previously recorded OTTI losses. The updated accounting guidance
requires an OTTI loss equal to the difference between fair value and amortized cost to be
recognized in earnings if the Company intends to sell the fixed maturity security or if it is more
likely than not the Company will be required to sell the fixed maturity security before recovery of
its amortized cost basis.
10
The remaining fixed maturity securities in an unrealized loss position are evaluated to determine
if a credit loss exists. If the Company does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis
of a fixed maturity security, the security is deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired for
credit reasons. For these securities, the bifurcation of OTTI losses into a credit component and a
non-credit component is required by the updated accounting guidance. The credit component is
recognized in earnings and represents the difference between the present value of the future cash
flows that the Company expects to collect and a fixed maturity securitys amortized cost basis.
The non-credit component is recognized in other comprehensive income and represents the difference
between fair value and the present value of the future cash flows that the Company expects to
collect.
Prior to the adoption of the updated accounting guidance, OTTI losses were not bifurcated between
credit and non-credit components. The difference between fair value and amortized cost was
recognized in earnings for all securities for which the Company did not expect to recover the
amortized cost basis, or for which the Company did not have the ability and intent to hold until
recovery of fair value to amortized cost.
Recently issued accounting standards to be adopted
Scope Exception Related To Credit Derivatives
In March 2009, the FASB issued updated accounting guidance which amends the accounting and
reporting requirements related to derivatives to provide clarifying language regarding when
embedded credit derivative features, including those in collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and
synthetic CDOs, are considered embedded derivatives subject to potential bifurcation. The updated
accounting guidance is effective for the first quarter beginning after June 15, 2010. The Company
is currently assessing the impact this updated accounting guidance will have on its financial
condition and results of operations.
Note C. Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to the Companys common stockholders is based on weighted
average outstanding shares. Basic earnings (loss) per share excludes the impact of dilutive
securities and is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to CNA by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share
reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common
stock were exercised or converted into common stock.
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, approximately 170 thousand potential shares attributable
to exercises under stock-based employee compensation plans were included in the calculation of
diluted earnings per share. For that same period, approximately 1.3 million potential shares
attributable to exercises under stock-based employee compensation plans were not included in the
calculation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would have been antidilutive.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, as a result of the net loss, none of the 2.0 million
potential shares attributable to exercises under stock-based employee compensation plans were
included in the calculation of loss per share as the effect would have been antidilutive.
The 2008 Senior Preferred Stock (2008 Senior Preferred) was issued in November 2008 and accrues
cumulative dividends at an initial rate of 10% per year. If declared, dividends are payable
quarterly and any dividends not declared or paid when due will be compounded quarterly.
11
Note D. Investments
The significant components of net investment income are presented in the following table.
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities |
|
$ |
510 |
|
|
$ |
475 |
|
Short term investments |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Limited partnerships |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Trading portfolio (a) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross investment income |
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
Investment expense |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
590 |
|
|
$ |
420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
There were no net unrealized gains (losses) on trading securities still held
included in net investment income for the three months ended March 31, 2010. As of March
31, 2009, the Company did not have a trading portfolio. |
Net realized investment gains (losses) are presented in the following table.
Net Realized Investment Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized gains |
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
$ |
104 |
|
Gross realized losses |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
(462 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
(358 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized gains |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Gross realized losses |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(220 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses) on equity securities |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
Short term investments and other |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses), net of participating
policyholders interests |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
(532 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
The components of net OTTI losses recognized in earnings by asset type are summarized in the
following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
149 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total asset-backed securities |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States, municipalities and political
subdivisions tax-exempt securities |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other taxable bonds |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
Redeemable preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturity securities available-for-sale |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity securities available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net OTTI losses recognized in earnings |
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A security is impaired if the fair value of the security is less than its cost adjusted for
accretion, amortization and previously recorded OTTI losses, otherwise defined as an unrealized
loss. When a security is impaired, the impairment is evaluated to determine whether it is
temporary or other-than-temporary.
Significant judgment is required in the determination of whether an OTTI loss has occurred for a
security. The Company follows a consistent and systematic process for determining and recording an
OTTI loss. The Company has established a committee responsible for the OTTI process. This
committee, referred to as the Impairment Committee, is made up of three officers appointed by the
Companys Chief Financial Officer. The Impairment Committee is responsible for evaluating
securities in an unrealized loss position on at least a quarterly basis.
The Impairment Committees assessment of whether an OTTI loss has occurred incorporates both
quantitative and qualitative information. Fixed maturity securities that the Company intends to
sell, or it more likely than not will be required to sell before recovery of amortized cost, are
considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired and the entire difference between the amortized
cost basis and fair value of the security is recognized as an OTTI loss in earnings. The remaining
fixed maturity securities in an unrealized loss position are evaluated to determine if a credit
loss exists. In order to determine if a credit loss exists, the factors considered by the
Impairment Committee include (a) the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, (b)
whether the debtor is current on interest and principal payments, (c) credit ratings of the
securities and (d) general market conditions and industry or sector specific outlook. The Company
also considers results and analysis of cash flow modeling for asset-backed securities, and when
appropriate, other fixed maturity securities. The focus of the analysis for asset-backed
securities is on assessing the sufficiency and quality of underlying collateral and timing of cash
flows based on scenario tests. If the present value of the modeled expected cash flows equals or
exceeds the amortized cost of a security, no credit loss is judged to exist and the asset-backed
security is deemed to be temporarily impaired. If the present value of the expected cash flows is
less than amortized cost, the security is judged to be other-than-temporarily impaired for credit
reasons and that shortfall, referred to as the credit component, is recognized as an OTTI loss in
earnings. The difference between the adjusted amortized cost basis and fair value, referred to as
the non-credit component, is recognized as an OTTI loss in Other comprehensive income.
The Company performs the discounted cash flow analysis using stressed scenarios to determine future
expectations regarding recoverability. For asset-backed securities, significant assumptions enter
into these cash flow projections including delinquency rates, probable risk of default, loss
severity upon a default, over collateralization and interest coverage triggers, credit support from
lower level tranches and impacts of rating
13
agency downgrades. The discount rate utilized is either the yield at acquisition or, for lower
rated structured securities, the current yield.
The Company applies the same impairment model as described above for the majority of non-redeemable
preferred stock securities on the basis that these securities possess characteristics similar to
debt securities and that the issuers maintain their ability to pay dividends. For all other equity
securities, in determining whether the security is other-than-temporarily impaired, the Impairment
Committee considers a number of factors including, but not limited to: (a) the length of time and
the extent to which the fair value has been less than amortized cost, (b) the financial condition
and near term prospects of the issuer, (c) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its
investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in value and
(d) general market conditions and industry or sector specific outlook.
Prior to the adoption of the updated accounting guidance related to OTTI in the second quarter of
2009 as further discussed in Note B, the Company applied the impairment model described in the
paragraph above to both fixed maturity and equity securities.
The following tables provide a summary of fixed maturity and equity securities.
Summary of Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross Unrealized Losses |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Less than |
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
OTTI |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
or Greater |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
government agencies |
|
$ |
165 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
7,303 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
6,937 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
811 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total asset-backed securities |
|
|
8,934 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
8,475 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States, municipalities and political
subdivisions tax-exempt securities |
|
|
6,458 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
6,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other taxable bonds |
|
|
21,518 |
|
|
|
1,276 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
22,628 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Redeemable preferred stock |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturity securities available-for-sale |
|
|
37,126 |
|
|
|
1,605 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
972 |
|
|
|
37,652 |
|
|
$ |
291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturity securities trading |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity securities available-for-sale |
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
37,836 |
|
|
$ |
1,669 |
|
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
$ |
1,006 |
|
|
$ |
38,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
Summary of Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross Unrealized Losses |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Less than |
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
OTTI |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
or Greater |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
government agencies |
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
199 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
7,469 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
6,937 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total asset-backed securities |
|
|
9,036 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
8,353 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States, municipalities and political
subdivisions tax-exempt securities |
|
|
7,142 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
6,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other taxable bonds |
|
|
19,015 |
|
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
19,839 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Redeemable preferred stock |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturity securities available-for-sale |
|
|
35,428 |
|
|
|
1,440 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
1,309 |
|
|
|
35,438 |
|
|
$ |
275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturity securities trading |
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity securities available-for-sale |
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
36,235 |
|
|
$ |
1,494 |
|
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
$ |
1,351 |
|
|
$ |
36,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of pretax net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities reclassified out of
Accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) into earnings was $32 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2010.
Activity for the three months ended March 31, 2010 related to the pretax fixed maturity credit loss
component reflected within Retained earnings for securities still held at March 31, 2010 was as
follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended |
|
(In millions) |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
Beginning balance of credit losses on fixed maturity securities |
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional credit losses for which an OTTI loss was previously recognized |
|
|
11 |
|
Additional credit losses for which an OTTI loss was not previously recognized |
|
|
5 |
|
Reductions for securities sold during the period |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance of credit losses on fixed maturity securities |
|
$ |
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
Based on current facts and circumstances, the Company has determined that no additional OTTI
losses related to the securities in an unrealized loss position presented in the March 31, 2010
Summary of Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities table above are required to be recorded. A
discussion of some of the factors reviewed in making that determination is presented below.
The classification between investment grade and non-investment grade presented in the discussion
below is based on a ratings methodology that takes into account ratings from the three major
providers, Standard & Poors (S&P), Moodys Investors Service, Inc. (Moodys) and Fitch Ratings
(Fitch) in that order of preference. If a security is not rated by any of the three, the Company
formulates an internal rating. For securities with credit support from third party guarantees, the
rating reflects the greater of the underlying rating of the issuer or the insured rating.
15
Asset-Backed Securities
The fair value of total asset-backed holdings at March 31, 2010 was $8,475 million which was
comprised of 2,141 different asset-backed structured securities. The fair value of these
securities does not tend to be influenced by the credit of the issuer but rather the
characteristics and projected cash flows of the underlying collateral. Each security has
deal-specific tranche structures, credit support that results from the unique deal structure,
particular collateral characteristics and other distinct security terms. As a result, seemingly
common factors such as delinquency rates and collateral performance affect each security
differently. Of these securities, 202 have underlying collateral that is either considered
sub-prime or Alt-A in nature. The exposure to sub-prime residential mortgage (sub-prime)
collateral and Alternative A residential mortgages that have lower than normal standards of loan
documentation (Alt-A) collateral is measured by the original deal structure.
Residential mortgage-backed securities include 270 structured securities in a gross unrealized loss
position. In addition, there were 60 agency mortgage-backed pass-through securities which are
guaranteed by agencies of the U.S. Government in a gross unrealized loss position. The aggregate
severity of the gross unrealized loss was approximately 9% of amortized cost.
Commercial mortgage-backed securities include 35 securities in a gross unrealized loss position.
The aggregate severity of the gross unrealized loss was approximately 16% of amortized cost.
Other asset-backed securities include 40 securities in a gross unrealized loss position. The
aggregate severity of the gross unrealized loss was approximately 6% of amortized cost.
The following table summarizes asset-backed securities in a gross unrealized loss position by
ratings distribution at March 31, 2010.
Gross Unrealized Losses by Ratings Distribution
March 31, 2010
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Rating |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
U.S. Government Agencies |
|
$ |
1,568 |
|
|
$ |
1,549 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
AAA |
|
|
1,933 |
|
|
|
1,752 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
AA |
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
A |
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
BBB |
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
Non-investment grade and equity tranches |
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
1,126 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,054 |
|
|
$ |
5,482 |
|
|
$ |
572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company believes the unrealized losses are primarily attributable to broader economic
conditions, liquidity concerns and wider than historical bid/ask spreads, and are not indicative of
the quality of the underlying collateral. The Company has no current intent to sell these
securities, nor is it more likely than not that it will be required to sell prior to recovery of
amortized cost. Generally, non-investment grade securities consist of investments which were
investment grade at the time of purchase but have subsequently been downgraded and primarily
consist of holdings senior to the equity tranche. Additionally, the Company believes that the
unrealized losses on these securities were not due to factors regarding the ultimate collection of
principal and interest, collateral shortfalls, or substantial changes in future cash flow
expectations; accordingly, the Company has determined that there are no additional OTTI losses to
be recorded at March 31, 2010.
16
States, Municipalities and Political Subdivisions Tax-Exempt Securities
The tax-exempt portfolio consists primarily of special revenue and assessment bonds, representing
83% of the overall portfolio, followed by general obligation political subdivision bonds at 13% and
state general obligation bonds at 4%.
The unrealized losses on the Companys investments in tax-exempt municipal securities are due to
market conditions in certain sectors or states that continued to lag behind the broader municipal
market recovery. Market conditions in the tax-exempt sector continued to improve in the first
quarter of 2010. However, yields for certain issuers and types of securities, such as zero coupon
bonds, auction rate and tobacco securitizations, continue to be higher than historical norms
relative to after-tax returns on other fixed income alternatives. The holdings for all tax-exempt
securities in this category include 313 securities in a gross unrealized loss position. The
aggregate severity of the total gross unrealized losses was approximately 12% of amortized cost.
The following table summarizes the ratings distribution of tax-exempt securities in a gross
unrealized loss position at March 31, 2010.
Gross Unrealized Losses by Ratings Distribution
March 31, 2010
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Rating |
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
AAA |
|
$ |
1,195 |
|
|
$ |
1,130 |
|
|
$ |
65 |
|
AA |
|
|
801 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
A |
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
BBB |
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
Non-investment grade |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,921 |
|
|
$ |
2,581 |
|
|
$ |
340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The largest exposures at March 31, 2010 as measured by gross unrealized losses were special
revenue bonds issued by several states backed by tobacco settlement funds with gross unrealized
losses of $105 million, and several separate issues of Puerto Rico sales tax revenue bonds with
gross unrealized losses of $79 million. All of these securities are rated investment grade.
The Company has no current intent to sell these securities, nor is it more likely than not that it
will be required to sell prior to recovery of amortized cost. Additionally, the Company believes
that the unrealized losses on these securities were not due to factors regarding the ultimate
collection of principal and interest; accordingly, the Company has determined that there are no
additional OTTI losses to be recorded at March 31, 2010.
17
Corporate and Other Taxable Bonds
The holdings in this category include 489 securities in a gross unrealized loss position. The
aggregate severity of the gross unrealized losses was approximately 3% of amortized cost.
The following table summarizes corporate and other taxable bonds in a gross unrealized loss
position by ratings distribution at March 31, 2010.
Gross Unrealized Losses by Ratings Distribution
March 31, 2010
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Rating |
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
AAA |
|
$ |
322 |
|
|
$ |
316 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
AA |
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
A |
|
|
1,368 |
|
|
|
1,332 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
BBB |
|
|
1,691 |
|
|
|
1,617 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
Non-investment grade |
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,852 |
|
|
$ |
4,686 |
|
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The unrealized losses on corporate and other taxable bonds are attributable to lingering
impacts of the broader credit market deterioration primarily in the financial sector of the
portfolio. Overall conditions in the corporate bond market have continued to improve in the first
quarter of 2010, resulting in improvement in the Companys unrealized position. The Company has no
current intent to sell these securities, nor is it more likely than not that it will be required to
sell prior to recovery of amortized cost. Additionally, the Company believes that the unrealized
losses were not due to factors regarding the ultimate collection of principal and interest;
accordingly, the Company has determined that there are no additional OTTI losses to be recorded at
March 31, 2010.
The Company has invested in securities with characteristics of both debt and equity investments,
often referred to as hybrid debt securities. Such securities are typically debt instruments issued
with long or extendable maturity dates, may provide for the ability to defer interest payments
without defaulting and are usually lower in the capital structure of the issuer than traditional
bonds. The data in the table above includes financial industry sector hybrid debt securities with
an aggregate fair value of $670 million and an aggregate amortized cost of $700 million.
Contractual Maturity
The following table summarizes available-for-sale fixed maturity securities by contractual maturity
at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities
because certain securities may be called or prepaid with or without call or prepayment penalties.
Securities not due at a single date are allocated based on weighted average life.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Maturity |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Cost or |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(In millions) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
1,333 |
|
|
$ |
1,325 |
|
|
$ |
1,240 |
|
|
$ |
1,219 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
11,371 |
|
|
|
11,679 |
|
|
|
10,046 |
|
|
|
10,244 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
10,469 |
|
|
|
10,567 |
|
|
|
10,646 |
|
|
|
10,538 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
13,953 |
|
|
|
14,081 |
|
|
|
13,496 |
|
|
|
13,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
37,126 |
|
|
$ |
37,652 |
|
|
$ |
35,428 |
|
|
$ |
35,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
Investment Commitments
As of March 31, 2010, the Company had committed approximately $243 million to future capital calls
from various third-party limited partnership investments in exchange for an ownership interest in
the related partnerships.
The Company invests in multiple bank loans as part of its overall investment strategy and has
committed to additional future purchases and sales. The purchase and sale of these investments are
recorded on the date that the legal agreements are finalized and cash settlements are made. As of
March 31, 2010, the Company had commitments to purchase $337 million and sell $110 million of
various bank loans.
19
Note E. Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company uses derivatives in the normal course of business, primarily in an attempt to reduce
its exposure to market risk (principally interest rate risk, equity stock price risk and foreign
currency risk) stemming from various assets and liabilities and credit risk (the ability of an
obligor to make timely payment of principal and/or interest). The Companys principal objective
under such risk strategies is to achieve the desired reduction in economic risk, even if the
position does not receive hedge accounting treatment.
The Companys use of derivatives is limited by statutes and regulations promulgated by the various
regulatory bodies to which it is subject, and by its own derivative policy. The derivative policy
limits the authorization to initiate derivative transactions to certain personnel. Derivatives
entered into for hedging, regardless of the choice to designate hedge accounting, shall have a
maturity that effectively correlates to the underlying hedged asset or liability. The policy
prohibits the use of derivatives containing greater than one-to-one leverage with respect to
changes in the underlying price, rate or index. The policy also prohibits the use of borrowed
funds, including funds obtained through securities lending, to engage in derivative transactions.
The Company has exposure to economic losses due to interest rate risk arising from changes in the
level of, or volatility of, interest rates. The Company attempts to mitigate its exposure to
interest rate risk in the normal course of portfolio management which includes rebalancing its
existing portfolios of assets and liabilities. In addition, various derivative financial
instruments are used to modify the interest rate risk exposures of certain assets and liabilities.
These strategies include the use of interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and floors, options,
futures, forwards and commitments to purchase securities. These instruments are generally used to
lock interest rates or market values, to shorten or lengthen durations of fixed maturity securities
or investment contracts, or to hedge (on an economic basis) interest rate risks associated with
investments and variable rate debt.
The Company is exposed to equity price risk as a result of its investment in equity securities and
equity derivatives. Equity price risk results from changes in the level or volatility of equity
prices, which affect the value of equity securities, or instruments that derive their value from
such securities. The Company attempts to mitigate its exposure to such risks by limiting its
investment in any one security or index. The Company may also manage this risk by utilizing
instruments such as options, swaps, futures and collars to protect appreciation in securities held.
The Company has exposure to credit risk arising from the uncertainty associated with a financial
instrument obligors ability to make timely principal and/or interest payments. The Company
attempts to mitigate this risk by limiting credit concentrations, practicing diversification and
frequently monitoring the credit quality of issuers and counterparties. In addition, the Company
may utilize credit derivatives such as credit default swaps (CDS) to modify the credit risk
inherent in certain investments. Credit default swaps involve a transfer of credit risk from one
party to another in exchange for periodic payments.
Foreign exchange rate risk arises from the possibility that changes in foreign currency exchange
rates will impact the fair value of financial instruments denominated in a foreign currency. The
Companys foreign transactions are primarily denominated in British pounds, Euros and Canadian
dollars. The Company typically manages this risk via asset/liability currency matching and through
the use of foreign currency forwards.
In addition to the derivatives used for risk management purposes described above, the Company may
also use derivatives for purposes of income enhancement. Income enhancement transactions are
entered into with the intention of providing additional income or yield to a particular portfolio
segment or instrument. Income enhancement transactions are limited in scope and primarily involve
the sale of covered options in which the Company receives a premium in exchange for selling a call
or put option.
The Company will also use CDS to sell credit protection against a specified credit event. In
selling credit protection, CDS are used to replicate fixed income securities when credit exposure
to certain issuers is not available or when it is economically beneficial to transact in the
derivative market compared to the cash market alternative. Credit risk includes both the default
event risk and market value exposure due to fluctuations in credit spreads. In selling CDS
protection, the Company receives a periodic premium in exchange for providing credit protection on
a single name reference obligation or a credit derivative index. If there is an event of default
as defined by the CDS agreement, the Company is required to pay the counterparty the referenced
notional amount of the CDS contract and in exchange, the Company is entitled to receive the
referenced defaulted security or the cash equivalent.
20
The tables below summarize CDS contracts where the Company sold credit protection as of March 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009. The fair value of the contracts represents the amount that the Company
would receive at those dates to exit the derivative positions. The maximum amount of future
payments assumes no residual value in the defaulted securities that the Company would receive as
part of the contract terminations and is equal to the notional value of the CDS contracts.
Credit Ratings of Underlying Reference Obligations
March 31, 2010
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of |
|
|
Maximum Amount of |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Credit Default |
|
|
Future Payments under |
|
|
Average Years |
|
|
|
Swaps |
|
|
Credit Default Swaps |
|
|
to Maturity |
|
B |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Ratings of Underlying Reference Obligations
December 31, 2009
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of |
|
|
Maximum Amount of |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Credit Default |
|
|
Future Payments under |
|
|
Average Years |
|
|
|
Swaps |
|
|
Credit Default Swaps |
|
|
to Maturity |
|
B |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit exposure associated with non-performance by the counterparties to derivative
instruments is generally limited to the uncollateralized fair value of the asset related to the
instruments recognized on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company attempts to
mitigate the risk of non-performance by monitoring the creditworthiness of counterparties and
diversifying derivatives to multiple counterparties. The Company generally requires that all
over-the-counter derivative contracts be governed by an International Swaps and Derivatives
Association (ISDA) Master Agreement, and exchanges collateral under the terms of these agreements
with its derivative investment counterparties depending on the amount of the exposure and the
credit rating of the counterparty. The Company does not offset its net derivative positions against
the fair value of the collateral provided. The fair value of cash collateral provided by the
Company was $3 million and $7 million at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The fair value of
cash collateral received from counterparties was $1 million and $1 million at March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009.
Derivative securities are recorded at fair value. See Note F for information regarding the fair
value of derivatives securities. Changes in the fair value of derivatives not held in a trading
portfolio are reported in Net realized investment gains (losses) on the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations. Changes in the fair value of derivatives held for trading purposes are
reported in Net investment income on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
21
A summary of the recognized gains (losses) related to derivative financial instruments
follows.
Recognized Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without hedge designation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
Credit default swaps purchased protection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
Credit default swaps sold protection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Futures sold, not yet purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
Options written |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total without hedge designation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures sold, not yet purchased |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of the aggregate contractual or notional amounts and gross estimated fair values
related to derivative financial instruments reported as Other invested assets or Other liabilities
on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets follows. The contractual or notional amounts for
derivatives are used to calculate the exchange of contractual payments under the agreements and may
not be representative of the potential for gain or loss on these instruments.
Derivative Financial Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual/ |
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
Notional |
|
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
(In millions) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
(Liability) |
|
Without hedge designation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit default swaps purchased protection |
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
Credit default swaps sold protection |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Currency forwards |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity warrants |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total without hedge designation |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures sold, not yet purchased |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual/ |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Notional |
|
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
(In millions) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
(Liability) |
|
Without hedge designation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit default swaps purchased protection |
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
Credit default swaps sold protection |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity warrants |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total without hedge designation |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures sold, not yet purchased |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the notional value of new derivative
transactions entered into and terminated totaled approximately $203 million and $323 million. This
activity was primarily attributable to interest rate futures, credit default swaps and forward
commitments for mortgage-backed securities. During the
22
three months ended March 31, 2009, the notional value of new derivative transactions entered into
and terminated totaled approximately $6.1 billion and $5.9 billion. This activity was primarily
attributable to interest rate swaps, interest rate futures and interest rate options.
Note F. Fair Value
Fair value is the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The
following fair value hierarchy is used in selecting inputs, with the highest priority given to
Level 1, as these are the most transparent or reliable.
Level 1 Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.
Level 2 Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or
similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all
significant inputs are observable in active markets.
Level 3 Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs are
not observable.
The Company attempts to establish fair value as an exit price in an orderly transaction consistent
with normal settlement market conventions. The Company is responsible for the valuation process
and seeks to obtain quoted market prices for all securities. When quoted market prices in active
markets are not available, the Company uses a number of methodologies to establish fair value
estimates including: discounted cash flow models, prices from recently executed transactions of
similar securities, or broker/dealer quotes, utilizing market observable information to the extent
possible. In conjunction with modeling activities, the Company may use external data as inputs.
The modeled inputs are consistent with observable market information, when available, or with the
Companys assumptions as to what market participants would use to value the securities. The
Company also uses pricing services as a significant source of data. The Company monitors all the
pricing inputs to determine if the markets from which the data is gathered are active. As further
validation of the Companys valuation process, the Company samples past fair value estimates and
compares the valuations to actual transactions executed in the market on similar dates.
23
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities) |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
at Fair Value |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
government agencies |
|
$ |
179 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,258 |
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
6,937 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
729 |
|
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,316 |
|
|
|
1,159 |
|
|
|
8,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions -
tax-exempt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,572 |
|
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
6,309 |
|
Corporate and other taxable bonds |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
21,836 |
|
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
22,638 |
|
Redeemable preferred stock |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturity securities |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
34,827 |
|
|
|
2,584 |
|
|
|
37,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
681 |
|
Derivative financial instruments, included in Other
invested assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Short term investments |
|
|
1,973 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,484 |
|
Life settlement contracts, included in Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
Discontinued operations investments, included in Other
assets |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
Separate account business |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,857 |
|
|
$ |
35,952 |
|
|
$ |
2,780 |
|
|
$ |
41,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments, included in Other
liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities) at |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
government agencies |
|
$ |
247 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,308 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
6,937 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,253 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
8,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions -
tax-exempt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,273 |
|
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
7,029 |
|
Corporate and other taxable bonds |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
19,127 |
|
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
19,875 |
|
Redeemable preferred stock |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturity securities |
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
32,756 |
|
|
|
2,467 |
|
|
|
35,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
644 |
|
Short term investments |
|
|
3,552 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,949 |
|
Life settlement contracts, included in Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
Discontinued operations investments, included in Other
liabilities |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
Separate account business |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,506 |
|
|
$ |
33,731 |
|
|
$ |
2,662 |
|
|
$ |
40,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments, included in Other
liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
The tables below present a reconciliation for all assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
investment gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) and net |
|
|
Net change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
change in unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 assets and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
appreciation |
|
|
appreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
liabilities held at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(depreciation) |
|
|
(depreciation) |
|
|
Purchases, sales, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
included in net |
|
|
included in other |
|
|
issuances and |
|
|
Transfers into |
|
|
Transfers out of |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
recognized in |
|
Level 3 |
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
income* |
|
|
comprehensive income |
|
|
settlements |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
net income* |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed
securities |
|
$ |
629 |
|
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
679 |
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
Commercial mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total asset-backed securities |
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
1,159 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
States, municipalities and political
subdivisions tax-exempt
securities |
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other taxable bonds |
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable preferred stock |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturity securities |
|
|
2,467 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
2,584 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments, net |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Short term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Life settlement contracts |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Discontinued operations investments |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
Separate account business |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,651 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
(45 |
) |
|
$ |
2,775 |
|
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
investment gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) and net |
|
|
Net change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
change in |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) on Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
appreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
appreciation |
|
|
(depreciation) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
liabilities held at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(depreciation) |
|
|
included in other |
|
|
Purchases, sales, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
included in net |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
issuances and |
|
|
Transfers into |
|
|
Transfers out of |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
recognized in net |
|
Level 3 |
|
January 1, 2009 |
|
|
loss* |
|
|
income |
|
|
settlements |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
loss* |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed
securities |
|
$ |
782 |
|
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(23 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
743 |
|
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
Commercial mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total asset-backed securities |
|
|
1,107 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
States, municipalities and
political
subdivisions tax-exempt
securities |
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other taxable bonds |
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
809 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Redeemable preferred stock |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturity securities |
|
|
2,492 |
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
2,765 |
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments, net |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
Life settlement contracts |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Discontinued operations investments |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Separate account business |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,797 |
|
|
$ |
(54 |
) |
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
143 |
|
|
$ |
155 |
|
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
$ |
3,090 |
|
|
$ |
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
* Net realized and unrealized gains and losses shown above are reported in Net income (loss) as
follows:
|
|
|
Major Category of Assets and Liabilities |
|
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations Line Items |
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses) |
Fixed maturity securities trading
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses) |
Derivative financial instruments held in a trading portfolio
|
|
Net investment income |
Derivative financial instruments, other
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses) |
Life settlement contracts
|
|
Other revenues |
Securities shown in the Level 3 tables on the previous pages may be transferred in or out
based on the availability of observable market information used to verify pricing sources or used
in pricing models. The availability of observable market information varies based on market
conditions and trading volume and may cause securities to move in and out of Level 3 from reporting
period to reporting period. The Companys policy is to recognize transfers between levels at the
beginning of the reporting period.
The following section describes the valuation methodologies used to measure different financial
instruments at fair value, including an indication of the level in the fair value hierarchy in
which the instrument is generally classified.
Fixed Maturity Securities
Level 1 securities include highly liquid government bonds within the U.S. Treasury securities
category and debt securities issued by foreign governments, which are included in the corporate and
other taxable bond category, for which quoted market prices are available. The remaining fixed
maturity securities are valued using pricing for similar securities, recently executed
transactions, cash flow models with yield curves, broker/dealer quotes and other pricing models
utilizing observable inputs. The valuation for most fixed maturity securities is classified as
Level 2. Securities within Level 2 include certain corporate bonds, municipal bonds, asset-backed
securities, mortgage-backed pass-through securities and redeemable preferred stock. Level 2
securities may also include securities that have firm sale commitments and prices that are not
recorded until the settlement date. Securities are generally assigned to Level 3 in cases where
broker/dealer quotes are significant inputs to the valuation and there is a lack of transparency as
to whether these quotes are based on information that is observable in the marketplace. These
securities include certain corporate bonds, asset-backed securities, municipal bonds and redeemable
preferred stock. Within corporate bonds and municipal bonds, Level 3 securities also include
tax-exempt auction rate certificates. Fair value of auction rate securities is determined utilizing
a pricing model with three primary inputs. The interest rate and spread inputs are observable from
like instruments while the maturity date assumption is unobservable due to the uncertain nature of
the principal prepayments prior to maturity.
Equity Securities
Level 1 securities include publicly traded securities valued using quoted market prices. Level 2
securities are primarily non-redeemable preferred stocks and common stocks valued using pricing for
similar securities, recently executed transactions, broker/dealer quotes and other pricing models
utilizing observable inputs. Level 3 securities include equity securities that are priced using
internal models with inputs that are not market observable.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Exchange traded derivatives, primarily futures, are valued using quoted market prices and are
classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Level 2 derivatives primarily include
currency forwards valued using observable market forward rates. Over-the-counter derivatives,
principally interest rate swaps, total return swaps, credit default swaps, equity warrants and
options, are valued using inputs including broker/dealer quotes and are classified within Level 3
of the valuation hierarchy due to a lack of transparency as to whether these quotes are based on
information that is observable in the marketplace.
28
Short Term Investments
The valuation of securities that are actively traded or have quoted prices are classified as Level
1. These securities include money market funds and treasury bills. Level 2 includes commercial
paper, for which all inputs are observable. Level 3 securities include bank debt securities
purchased within one year of maturity where broker/dealer quotes are significant inputs to the
valuation and there is a lack of transparency to the market inputs used.
Life Settlement Contracts
The fair values of life settlement contracts are determined as the present value of the anticipated
death benefits less anticipated premium payments based on contract terms that are distinct for each
insured, as well as the Companys own assumptions for mortality, premium expense, and the rate of
return that a buyer would require on the contracts, as no comparable market pricing data is
available.
Discontinued Operations Investments
Assets relating to the Companys discontinued operations include fixed maturity securities and
short term investments. The valuation methodologies for these asset types have been described
above.
Separate Account Business
Separate account business includes fixed maturity securities, equities and short term investments.
The valuation methodologies for these asset types have been described above.
Financial Assets and Liabilities Not Measured at Fair Value
The carrying amount and estimated fair value of the Companys financial instrument assets and
liabilities which are not measured at fair value on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are
listed in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivable for the issuance of common stock |
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium deposits and annuity contracts |
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
$ |
106 |
|
Long term debt |
|
|
2,304 |
|
|
|
2,369 |
|
|
|
2,303 |
|
|
|
2,290 |
|
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of these financial
assets and liabilities.
The fair values of notes receivable for the issuance of common stock were estimated using
discounted cash flows utilizing interest rates currently offered for obligations securitized with
similar collateral.
Premium deposits and annuity contracts were valued based on cash surrender values, estimated fair
values or policyholder liabilities, net of amounts ceded related to sold business.
The Companys senior notes and debentures were valued based on quoted market prices. The fair
value for other long term debt was estimated using discounted cash flows based on current
incremental borrowing rates for similar borrowing arrangements.
The carrying amounts reported on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for Cash, Accrued
investment income and certain other assets and other liabilities approximate fair value due to the
short term nature of these items. These assets and liabilities are not listed in the table above.
29
Note G. Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves
The Companys property and casualty insurance claim and claim adjustment expense reserves represent
the estimated amounts necessary to resolve all outstanding claims, including claims that are
incurred but not reported (IBNR) as of the reporting date. The Companys reserve projections are
based primarily on detailed analysis of the facts in each case, the Companys experience with
similar cases and various historical development patterns. Consideration is given to such
historical patterns as field reserving trends and claims settlement practices, loss payments,
pending levels of unpaid claims and product mix, as well as court decisions, economic conditions
and public attitudes. All of these factors can affect the estimation of claim and claim adjustment
expense reserves.
Establishing claim and claim adjustment expense reserves, including claim and claim adjustment
expense reserves for catastrophic events that have occurred, is an estimation process. Many
factors can ultimately affect the final settlement of a claim and, therefore, the necessary
reserve. Changes in the law, results of litigation, medical costs, the cost of repair materials
and labor rates can all affect ultimate claim costs. In addition, time can be a critical part of
reserving determinations since the longer the span between the incidence of a loss and the payment
or settlement of the claim, the more variable the ultimate settlement amount can be. Accordingly,
short-tail claims, such as property damage claims, tend to be more reasonably estimable than
long-tail claims, such as general liability and professional liability claims. Adjustments to
prior year reserve estimates, if necessary, are reflected in the results of operations in the
period that the need for such adjustments is determined.
Catastrophes are an inherent risk of the property and casualty insurance business and have
contributed to material period-to-period fluctuations in the Companys results of operations and/or
equity. The Company reported catastrophe losses, net of reinsurance, of $40 million and $13
million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 for events occurring in those periods.
Catastrophe losses in the first quarter of 2010 related primarily to winter storms and the Chilean
earthquake. There can be no assurance that the Companys ultimate cost for catastrophes will not
exceed current estimates.
The following provides discussion of the Companys Asbestos and Environmental Pollution (A&E)
reserves.
A&E Reserves
The Companys property and casualty insurance subsidiaries have actual and potential exposures
related to A&E claims.
The following table provides data related to the Companys A&E claim and claim adjustment expense
reserves.
A&E Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental |
|
|
|
Asbestos |
|
|
Pollution |
|
|
Asbestos |
|
|
Pollution |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross reserves |
|
$ |
1,991 |
|
|
$ |
467 |
|
|
$ |
2,046 |
|
|
$ |
482 |
|
Ceded reserves |
|
|
(895 |
) |
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
(909 |
) |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserves |
|
$ |
1,096 |
|
|
$ |
272 |
|
|
$ |
1,137 |
|
|
$ |
286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
Asbestos
The table below provides a reconciliation between the Companys beginning and ending net reserves
for asbestos.
Asbestos Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning net reserves |
|
$ |
1,137 |
|
|
$ |
1,202 |
|
Pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior
year claim and allocated claim adjustment
expense reserve development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid claims, net of reinsurance recoveries |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending net reserves |
|
$ |
1,096 |
|
|
$ |
1,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ultimate cost of reported claims, and in particular A&E claims, is subject to a great many
uncertainties, including future developments of various kinds that the Company does not control and
that are difficult or impossible to foresee accurately. With respect to the litigation identified,
pending rulings are critical to the evaluation of the ultimate cost to the Company. Accordingly,
the extent of losses beyond any amounts that may be accrued are not readily determinable at this
time.
Some asbestos-related defendants have asserted that their insurance policies are not subject to
aggregate limits on coverage. The Company has such claims from a number of insureds. Some of
these claims involve insureds facing exhaustion of products liability aggregate limits in their
policies, who have asserted that their asbestos-related claims fall within so-called non-products
liability coverage contained within their policies rather than products liability coverage, and
that the claimed non-products coverage is not subject to any aggregate limit. It is difficult to
predict the ultimate size of any of the claims for coverage purportedly not subject to aggregate
limits or predict to what extent, if any, the attempts to assert non-products claims outside the
products liability aggregate will succeed. The Companys policies also contain other limits
applicable to these claims and the Company has additional coverage defenses to certain claims. The
Company has attempted to manage its asbestos exposure by aggressively seeking to settle claims on
acceptable terms. There can be no assurance that any of these settlement efforts will be
successful, or that any such claims can be settled on terms acceptable to the Company. Where the
Company cannot settle a claim on acceptable terms, the Company aggressively litigates the claim.
However, adverse developments with respect to such matters could have a material adverse effect on
the Companys results of operations and/or equity.
Certain asbestos claim litigation in which the Company is currently engaged is described below:
A.P. Green: In February 2003, the Company announced it had resolved asbestos-related coverage
litigation and claims involving A.P. Green Industries, A.P. Green Services and BigelowLiptak
Corporation. Under the agreement, the Company is required to pay $70 million, net of reinsurance
recoveries, over a ten year period commencing after the final approval of a bankruptcy plan of
reorganization. The settlement received initial bankruptcy court approval in August 2003. The
debtors plan of reorganization includes an injunction to protect the Company from any future
claims. The bankruptcy court issued an opinion in September 2007 recommending confirmation of that
plan. In July 2008, the District Court affirmed the Bankruptcy Courts ruling. Several insurers
have appealed that ruling to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals; that appeal was argued in May 2009
and the parties are awaiting the courts decision.
Direct Action Case Montana: In March 2002, a direct action was filed in Montana (Pennock, et
al. v. Maryland Casualty, et al. First Judicial District Court of Lewis & Clark County,
Montana) by eight individual plaintiffs (all employees of W.R. Grace & Co. (W.R. Grace)) and their
spouses against the Company, Maryland Casualty and the State of Montana. This action alleges that
the carriers failed to warn of or otherwise protect W.R. Grace employees from the dangers of
asbestos at a W.R. Grace vermiculite mining facility in Libby, Montana. The Montana direct action
is currently stayed because of W.R. Graces pending bankruptcy. In April 2008, W.R. Grace
announced a settlement in principle with the asbestos personal injury claimants committee subject
to confirmation of a plan of reorganization by the bankruptcy court. The confirmation hearing was
held in two phases. The first phase was held in June 2009. The second phase concluded in January
2010 and the
31
bankruptcy court has taken the matter under advisement. The settlement in principle with the
asbestos claimants has no present impact on the stay currently imposed on the Montana direct action
and with respect to such claims, numerous factual and legal issues remain to be resolved that are
critical to the final result, the outcome of which cannot be predicted with any reliability. These
factors include: (a) the unclear nature and scope of any alleged duties owed to people exposed to
asbestos and the resulting uncertainty as to the potential pool of potential claimants; (b) the
potential application of Statutes of Limitation to many of the claims which may be made depending
on the nature and scope of the alleged duties; (c) the unclear nature of the required nexus between
the acts of the defendants and the right of any particular claimant to recovery; (d) the diseases
and damages claimed by such claimants; (e) the extent that such liability would be shared with
other potentially responsible parties; and (f) the impact of bankruptcy proceedings on claims
resolution. Accordingly, the extent of losses beyond any amounts that may be accrued are not
readily determinable at this time.
The Company is vigorously defending these and other cases and believes that it has meritorious
defenses to the claims asserted. However, there are numerous factual and legal issues to be
resolved in connection with these claims, and it is extremely difficult to predict the outcome or
ultimate financial exposure represented by these matters. Adverse developments with respect to any
of these matters could have a material adverse effect on the Companys business, insurer financial
strength and debt ratings, results of operations and/or equity.
Environmental Pollution
The table below provides a reconciliation between the Companys beginning and ending net reserves
for environmental pollution.
Environmental Pollution Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning net reserves |
|
$ |
286 |
|
|
$ |
262 |
|
Pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior
year claim and allocated claim adjustment
expense reserve development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid claims, net of reinsurance recoveries |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending net reserves |
|
$ |
272 |
|
|
$ |
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
Net Prior Year Development
The following tables and discussion include the net prior year development recorded for CNA
Specialty, CNA Commercial and Corporate & Other Non-Core. Favorable net prior year development of
$9 million was recorded in the Life & Group Non-Core segment for the three months ended March 31,
2010. Included in this amount is favorable reserve development of $24 million arising from a
commutation of an assumed reinsurance agreement. For the three months ended March 31, 2009 for the
Life & Group Non-Core segment, unfavorable net prior year development of $11 million was recorded.
Net Prior Year Development
Three months ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CNA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate & Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty |
|
|
CNA Commercial |
|
|
Non-Core |
|
|
Total |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year claim and
allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core (Non-A&E) |
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
(51 |
) |
A&E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year development before
impact of premium development |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax (favorable) unfavorable premium development |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year
development |
|
$ |
(29 |
) |
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Prior Year Development
Three months ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CNA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate & Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty |
|
|
CNA Commercial |
|
|
Non-Core |
|
|
Total |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year claim and
allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core (Non-A&E) |
|
$ |
(29 |
) |
|
$ |
(42 |
) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(70 |
) |
A&E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year development before
impact of premium development |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax (favorable) unfavorable premium development |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year
development |
|
$ |
(34 |
) |
|
$ |
(22 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
2010 Net Prior Year Development
CNA Specialty
The favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development was primarily due to
favorable incurred loss emergence in several professional liability lines of business primarily in
accident years 2007 and prior. This favorability was partially offset by unfavorable development
in the employee practices liability line driven by higher unemployment, primarily in accident years
2008 and 2009.
CNA Commercial
The favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development was primarily due to
favorable experience in non-catastrophe related property coverages in accident years 2007 and
prior.
2009 Net Prior Year Development
CNA Specialty
The favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development was primarily due to
experience in liability coverages. This favorable development was the result of decreased
frequency of large claims in accident years 2007 and prior.
An additional $7 million of favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve
development was a result of favorable outcomes on claims relating to catastrophes in accident years
2005 and 2008.
CNA Commercial
The favorable claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development was primarily due to
experience in property coverages, including $31 million resulting from favorable frequency and
severity on claims relating to catastrophes in accident year 2008.
34
Note H. Legal Proceedings and Contingent Liabilities
Insurance Brokerage Antitrust Litigation
In August 2005, CNAF and certain insurance subsidiaries were joined as defendants, along with other
insurers and brokers, in multidistrict litigation pending in the United States District Court for
the District of New Jersey, In re Insurance Brokerage Antitrust Litigation, Civil No.
04-5184 (FSH). The plaintiffs allege bid rigging and improprieties in the payment of contingent
commissions in connection with the sale of insurance that violated federal and state antitrust
laws, the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act and state common law.
After discovery, the District Court dismissed the federal antitrust claims and the RICO claims, and
declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims. The plaintiffs have
appealed the dismissal of their complaint to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. The parties have
filed their briefs on the appeal. Oral argument was held in April 2009, and the Court took the
matter under advisement. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses to this action and
intends to defend the case vigorously.
The extent of losses beyond any amounts that may be accrued are not readily determinable at this
time. However, based on facts and circumstances presently known, in the opinion of management, an
unfavorable outcome will not materially affect the equity of the Company, although results of
operations may be adversely affected.
Asbestos and Environmental Pollution (A&E) Reserves
The Company is also a party to litigation and claims related to A&E cases arising in the ordinary
course of business. See Note G for further discussion.
Other Litigation
The Company is also a party to other litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. Based
on the facts and circumstances currently known, such other litigation will not, in the opinion of
management, materially affect the equity or results of operations of the Company.
Note I. Benefit Plans
The components of net periodic cost (benefit) are presented in the following table.
Net Periodic Cost (Benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
Interest cost on projected
benefit obligation |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
Actuarial loss amortization |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost |
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Interest cost on projected
benefit obligation |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Prior service cost amortization |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic postretirement benefit |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
Note J. Commitments, Contingencies, and Guarantees
Commitments and Contingencies
The Company holds an investment in a real estate joint venture. In the normal course of business,
the Company, on a joint and several basis with other unrelated insurance company shareholders, has
committed to continue funding the operating deficits of this joint venture. Additionally, the
Company and the other unrelated shareholders, on a joint and several basis, have guaranteed an
operating lease for an office building, which expires in 2016. The guarantee of the operating
lease is a parallel guarantee to the commitment to fund operating deficits; consequently, the
separate guarantee to the lessor is not expected to be triggered as long as the joint venture
continues to be funded by its shareholders which provide liquidity to make its annual lease
payments.
In the event that the other parties to the joint venture are unable to meet their commitments in
funding the operations of this joint venture, the Company would be required to assume the
obligation for the entire office building operating lease. The Company does not believe it is
likely that it will be required to do so. However, the maximum potential future lease payments at
March 31, 2010 that the Company could be required to pay under this guarantee are approximately
$116 million. If the Company were required to assume the entire lease obligation, the Company
would have the right to pursue reimbursement from the other shareholders and the right to all
sublease revenues.
The Company has entered into a limited number of contracts that guarantee minimum payments,
primarily related to outsourced services, software and telecommunication services. Estimated
future minimum payments under these contracts, which amounted to approximately $15 million at March
31, 2010, are $11 million in 2010, $3 million in 2011 and $1 million in 2012.
Guarantees
In the course of selling business entities and assets to third parties, the Company has agreed to
indemnify purchasers for losses arising out of breaches of representation and warranties with
respect to the business entities or assets being sold, including, in certain cases, losses arising
from undisclosed liabilities or certain named litigation. Such indemnification provisions
generally survive for periods ranging from nine months following the applicable closing date to the
expiration of the relevant statutes of limitation. As of March 31, 2010, the aggregate amount of
quantifiable indemnification agreements in effect for sales of business entities, assets and third
party loans was $819 million.
In addition, the Company has agreed to provide indemnification to third party purchasers for
certain losses associated with sold business entities or assets that are not limited by a
contractual monetary amount. As of March 31, 2010, the Company had outstanding unlimited
indemnifications in connection with the sales of certain of its business entities or assets that
included tax liabilities arising prior to a purchasers ownership of an entity or asset, defects in
title at the time of sale, employee claims arising prior to closing and in some cases losses
arising from certain litigation and undisclosed liabilities. These indemnification agreements
survive until the applicable statutes of limitation expire, or until the agreed upon contract terms
expire.
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company has recorded liabilities of approximately
$16 million related to indemnification agreements and management believes that it is not likely
that any future indemnity claims will be significantly greater than the amounts recorded.
36
Note K. Business Segments
The Companys core property and casualty commercial insurance operations are reported in two
business segments: CNA Specialty and CNA Commercial. The Companys non-core operations are
managed in two segments: Life & Group Non-Core and Corporate & Other Non-Core.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note A of the
Consolidated Financial Statements within CNAFs Form 10-K. The Company manages most of its assets
on a legal entity basis, while segment operations are conducted across legal entities. As such,
only insurance and reinsurance receivables, insurance reserves and deferred acquisition costs are
readily identifiable by individual segment. Distinct investment portfolios are not maintained for
each segment; accordingly, allocation of assets to each segment is not performed. Therefore, net
investment income and realized investment gains or losses are allocated primarily based on each
segments net carried insurance reserves, as adjusted. All significant intrasegment income and
expense has been eliminated. Income taxes have been allocated on the basis of the taxable income
of the segments.
In the following tables, certain financial measures are presented to provide information used by
management to monitor the Companys operating performance. Management utilizes these financial
measures to monitor the Companys insurance operations and investment portfolio. Net operating
income, which is derived from certain income statement amounts, is used by management to monitor
performance of the Companys insurance operations. The Companys investment portfolio is monitored
through analysis of various quantitative and qualitative factors and certain decisions related to
the sale or other-than-temporary impairment of investments that produce realized gains and losses.
Net operating income (loss) is calculated by excluding from net income (loss) attributable to CNA
the after-tax effects of 1) net realized investment gains or losses, 2) income or loss from
discontinued operations and 3) any cumulative effects of changes in accounting guidance. The
calculation of net operating income excludes net realized investment gains or losses because net
realized investment gains or losses are largely discretionary, except for losses related to OTTI,
and are generally driven by economic factors that are not necessarily consistent with key drivers
of underwriting performance, and are therefore not considered an indication of trends in insurance
operations.
The Companys investment portfolio is monitored by management through analyses of various factors
including unrealized gains and losses on securities, portfolio duration and exposure to interest
rate, market and credit risk. Based on such analyses, the Company may recognize an OTTI loss on an
investment security in accordance with its policy, or sell a security. Such activities will
produce realized gains and losses.
The significant components of the Companys continuing operations and selected balance sheet items
are presented in the following tables.
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
CNA |
|
|
CNA |
|
|
Life & Group |
|
|
Corporate & Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
Specialty |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Non-Core |
|
|
Non-Core |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earned premiums |
|
$ |
654 |
|
|
$ |
816 |
|
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
1,615 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
590 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
1,052 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims, benefits and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net incurred claims and benefits |
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,306 |
|
Policyholders dividends |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342 |
|
Other insurance related expenses |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
206 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total claims, benefits and expenses |
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) from continuing operations before
income tax |
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
323 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit on operating income (loss) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
Net operating income, after-tax, attributable to
noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income (loss) from continuing operations
attributable to CNA |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses), net of
participating policyholders interests |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
Income tax expense on net realized investment gains (losses) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Net realized investment (gains) losses, after-tax,
attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses) attributable to CNA |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable
to CNA |
|
$ |
137 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance receivables |
|
$ |
1,084 |
|
|
$ |
2,200 |
|
|
$ |
1,602 |
|
|
$ |
1,792 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,678 |
|
Insurance receivables |
|
$ |
626 |
|
|
$ |
1,204 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,842 |
|
Deferred acquisition costs |
|
$ |
324 |
|
|
$ |
335 |
|
|
$ |
450 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,109 |
|
Insurance reserves |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claim and claim adjustment expenses |
|
$ |
6,993 |
|
|
$ |
12,980 |
|
|
$ |
2,729 |
|
|
$ |
3,857 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
26,559 |
|
Unearned premiums |
|
|
1,534 |
|
|
|
1,599 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
3,283 |
|
Future policy benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,090 |
|
Policyholders funds |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177 |
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
CNA |
|
|
CNA |
|
|
Life & Group |
|
|
Corporate & Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
Specialty |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Non-Core |
|
|
Non-Core |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earned premiums |
|
$ |
659 |
|
|
$ |
863 |
|
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
1,672 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
420 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
799 |
|
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims, benefits and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net incurred claims and benefits |
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
614 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,335 |
|
Policyholders dividends |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349 |
|
Other insurance related expenses |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
181 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total claims, benefits and expenses |
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
922 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) from continuing operations
before income tax |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
197 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit on operating income (loss) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
Net operating income, after-tax, attributable to
noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income (loss) from continuing operations
attributable to CNA |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment losses, net of participating
policyholders interests |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(532 |
) |
Income tax benefit on net realized investment losses |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187 |
|
Net realized investment losses, after-tax,
attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment losses attributable to CNA |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(344 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
attributable to CNA |
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
(49 |
) |
|
$ |
(146 |
) |
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(195 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance receivables |
|
$ |
1,077 |
|
|
$ |
2,234 |
|
|
$ |
1,744 |
|
|
$ |
1,877 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,932 |
|
Insurance receivables |
|
$ |
613 |
|
|
$ |
1,234 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,858 |
|
Deferred acquisition costs |
|
$ |
318 |
|
|
$ |
336 |
|
|
$ |
454 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,108 |
|
Insurance reserves |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claim and claim adjustment expenses |
|
$ |
6,922 |
|
|
$ |
13,005 |
|
|
$ |
2,883 |
|
|
$ |
4,006 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
26,816 |
|
Unearned premiums |
|
|
1,528 |
|
|
|
1,603 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,274 |
|
Future policy benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,981 |
|
Policyholders funds |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192 |
|
39
The following table provides revenue by line of business for each reportable segment.
Revenues are comprised of operating revenues and net realized investment gains and losses, net of
participating policyholders interests.
Revenues by Line of Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CNA Specialty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional & Management Liability |
|
$ |
631 |
|
|
$ |
488 |
|
International |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Surety |
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
Warranty & Alternative Risks |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CNA Specialty revenues |
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CNA Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Insurance |
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
Business Insurance |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
International |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
CNA Select Risk |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CNA Commercial revenues |
|
|
1,073 |
|
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life & Group Non-Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life & Annuity |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Health |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
Other |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life & Group Non-Core revenues |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate & Other Non-Core revenues |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
2,315 |
|
|
$ |
1,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
Note L. IT Transformation
The Company has commenced a program involving several initiatives that are intended to
significantly transform its Information Technology (IT) organization and delivery model. A key
initiative is moving to a managed services model which involves outsourcing the Companys
infrastructure and application development functions to selected vendors that have proven skills
and scale. The IT Transformation is expected to improve both the efficiency and effectiveness of
IT delivery in support of the Companys businesses. The costs of the IT Transformation include
estimated employee termination benefits, employee retention benefits, and legal, consulting and
other vendor transition services costs. The Company anticipates that the total costs for the IT
Transformation will be approximately $41 million, of which $25 million was incurred during the
first quarter of 2010. The costs recognized in the first quarter include the majority of estimated
employee termination benefits and consulting and legal costs primarily associated with the managed
services initiative. Vendor transition service costs represent the largest cost going forward, and
these costs will be recognized as the related services are provided. The Company anticipates the
program will be completed by December 2011, with the majority of the remaining costs recognized
during 2010.
The costs incurred to date are included in Total claims, benefits and expenses on the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations and have been allocated to the Companys reportable segments
in a manner consistent with the Companys current allocation of IT expenses, which is primarily
based on estimated consumption. The costs by reportable segment for the three months ended March
31, 2010 are as follows.
IT Transformation Costs by Segment
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
2010 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
CNA Specialty |
|
$ |
5 |
|
CNA Commercial |
|
|
11 |
|
Life & Group Non-Core |
|
|
7 |
|
Corporate & Other Non-Core |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total IT Transformation Costs |
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
41
CNA Financial Corporation
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Overview
The following discussion highlights significant factors impacting the consolidated operations and
financial condition of CNA Financial Corporation (CNAF) and its controlled
subsidiaries (collectively CNA or the Company). References to CNA, the Company, we, our,
us or like terms refer to the business of CNA and its subsidiaries. Based on 2008 statutory net
written premiums, we are the seventh largest commercial insurance writer and the 13th
largest property and casualty insurance organization in the United States of America. References
to net operating income (loss), net realized investment gains (losses) and net income (loss) used
in this MD&A reflect amounts attributable to CNA, unless otherwise noted.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements in Item 1 of Part I of this Form 10-Q and Item 1A Risk Factors and Item 7 Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which are included in our
Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the year ended December 31,
2009.
We utilize the net operating income financial measure to monitor our operations. Net operating
income is calculated by excluding from net income (loss) attributable to CNA the after-tax effects
of 1) net realized investment gains or losses, 2) income or loss from discontinued operations and
3) any cumulative effects of changes in accounting guidance. See further discussion regarding how
we manage our business in Note K of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under
Item 1. In evaluating the results of our CNA Specialty and CNA Commercial segments, we utilize the
loss ratio, the expense ratio, the dividend ratio and the combined ratio. These ratios are
calculated using GAAP financial results. The loss ratio is the percentage of net incurred claim
and claim adjustment expenses to net earned premiums. The expense ratio is the percentage of
insurance underwriting and acquisition expenses, including the amortization of deferred acquisition
costs, to net earned premiums. The dividend ratio is the ratio of policyholders dividends
incurred to net earned premiums. The combined ratio is the sum of the loss, expense and dividend
ratios.
Changes in estimates of claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserves and premium accruals,
net of reinsurance, for prior years are defined as net prior year development within this MD&A.
These changes can be favorable or unfavorable. Net prior year development does not include the
impact of related acquisition expenses. Further information on our reserves is provided in Note G
of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 1.
42
CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS
Results of Operations
The following table includes the consolidated results of our operations. For more detailed
components of our business operations and the net operating income financial measure, see the
segment discussions within this MD&A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earned premiums |
|
$ |
1,615 |
|
|
$ |
1,672 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
2,281 |
|
|
|
2,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims, benefits and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net incurred claims and benefits |
|
|
1,306 |
|
|
|
1,335 |
|
Policyholders dividends |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs |
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
Other insurance related expenses |
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total claims, benefits and expenses |
|
|
1,958 |
|
|
|
1,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income from continuing operations before income tax |
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
Income tax expense on operating income |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
Net operating income, after-tax, attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income from continuing operations attributable to CNA |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses), net of participating policyholders interests |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
(532 |
) |
Income tax (expense) benefit on net realized investment gains (losses) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
187 |
|
Net realized investment (gains) losses, after-tax, attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses) attributable to CNA |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(344 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to CNA |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to CNA, net of income tax
(expense) benefit of $0 and $0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to CNA |
|
$ |
245 |
|
|
$ |
(195 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net results improved $440 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared with
the same period in 2009. This improvement was driven by significantly improved net realized
investment results and increased net operating income.
Net realized investment results improved $366 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as
compared with the same period in 2009. See the Investments section of this MD&A for further
discussion of net realized investment results and net investment income.
Net operating income improved $74 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared
with the same period in 2009. Net operating income improved $45 million for our core segments, CNA
Specialty and CNA Commercial, and net operating results improved $29 million for our non-core
segments. This overall improvement was primarily due to higher net investment income, partially
offset by costs associated with our Information Technology (IT) Transformation as discussed below.
Our core segments were also unfavorably impacted by higher catastrophe losses and decreased
favorable net prior year development. Catastrophe losses were $26 million after-tax in the first
quarter of 2010, as compared to catastrophe losses of $8 million after-tax in the first quarter of
2009. Our non-core segments were impacted by the favorable performance of investments
43
supporting
our pension deposit business and favorable reserve development arising from the commutation of an
assumed reinsurance agreement, partially offset by unfavorable results in our long term care
business.
As further discussed in Note L of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under
Item 1, we have commenced a program to significantly transform our IT organization and delivery
model. We anticipate
that the total costs for this program will be approximately $41 million, of which $25 million was
incurred during the first quarter of 2010. When the results of this program are fully operational,
we anticipate significant annual savings based on our current annual level of IT spending. A
significant portion of the annual savings is anticipated to be achieved in 2011 with full annual
savings in 2012. Some or all of these estimated savings may be invested in IT or other
enhancements necessary to support our business strategies.
Favorable net prior year development of $35 million and $56 million was recorded for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 related to our CNA Specialty, CNA Commercial and Corporate &
Other Non-Core segments. Further information on net prior year development for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 is included in Note G of the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements included under Item 1.
Net earned premiums decreased $57 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared
with the same period in 2009, which includes a $47 million decrease related to CNA Commercial. See
the Segment Results section of this MD&A for further discussion.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) requires us to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements and the amounts of revenues and expenses reported during the period. Actual results may
differ from those estimates.
Our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes have been prepared in
accordance with GAAP applied on a consistent basis. We continually evaluate the accounting
policies and estimates used to prepare the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. In
general, our estimates are based on historical experience, evaluation of current trends,
information from third party professionals and various other assumptions that are believed to be
reasonable under the known facts and circumstances.
The accounting estimates below are considered by us to be critical to an understanding of our
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as their application places the most significant
demands on our judgment.
|
|
Insurance Reserves |
|
|
|
Reinsurance |
|
|
|
Valuation of Investments and Impairment of Securities |
|
|
|
Long Term Care Products |
|
|
|
Payout Annuity Contracts |
|
|
|
Pension and Postretirement Benefit Obligations |
|
|
|
Legal Proceedings |
|
|
|
Income Taxes |
Due to the inherent uncertainties involved with these types of judgments, actual results could
differ significantly from estimates and may have a material adverse impact on our results of
operations or equity. See the Critical Accounting Estimates section of our Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included under Item 7 of our Form
10-K for further information.
44
SEGMENT RESULTS
The following discusses the results of continuing operations for our operating segments.
CNA SPECIALTY
The following table details the results of operations for CNA Specialty.
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net written premiums |
|
$ |
656 |
|
|
$ |
672 |
|
Net earned premiums |
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
Net operating income |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
Net realized investment gains (losses), after-tax |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss adjustment expense |
|
|
61.5 |
% |
|
|
60.0 |
% |
Expense |
|
|
30.8 |
|
|
|
28.7 |
|
Dividend |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
92.5 |
% |
|
|
89.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net written premiums for CNA Specialty decreased $16 million for the three months ended March
31, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009. The decrease in net written premiums was driven
by our architects & engineers, realtors and CNA HealthPro lines of business, as current economic
and competitive market conditions have led to decreased insured exposures and lower rates. These
conditions may continue to put ongoing pressure on premium and income levels and the expense ratio.
Net earned premiums decreased $5 million as compared with the same period in 2009, consistent with
the trend of lower net written premiums.
CNA Specialtys average rate decreased 1% for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to
a decrease of 3% for the three months ended March 31, 2009 for the policies that renewed during
those periods. Retention rates of 86% and 85% were achieved for those policies that were available
for renewal in each period.
Net income improved $99 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared with the same
period in 2009. This improvement was primarily due to improved net realized investment results and
improved net operating income. See the Investments section of this MD&A for further discussion of
the net realized investment results and net investment income.
Net operating income improved $19 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared
with the same period in 2009. This improvement was primarily due to higher net investment income,
partially offset by increased expenses.
The combined ratio increased 3.4 points for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared with
the same period in 2009. The loss ratio increased 1.5 points primarily due to decreased favorable
net prior year development. The expense ratio increased 2.1 points, primarily related to higher
underwriting expenses and higher commission rates. Underwriting expenses increased primarily due
to IT Transformation costs. See the Consolidated Operations section of this MD&A for further
discussion of IT Transformation costs.
Favorable net prior year development of $29 million was recorded for the three months ended March
31, 2010, compared to favorable net prior year development of $34 million for the same period in
2009. Further information on CNA Specialty net prior year development for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009 is included in Note G of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
included under Item 1.
45
The following table summarizes the gross and net carried reserves as of March 31, 2010 and December
31, 2009 for CNA Specialty.
Gross and Net Carried
Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Gross Case Reserves |
|
$ |
2,248 |
|
|
$ |
2,208 |
|
Gross IBNR Reserves |
|
|
4,745 |
|
|
|
4,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gross Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves |
|
$ |
6,993 |
|
|
$ |
6,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Case Reserves |
|
$ |
1,818 |
|
|
$ |
1,781 |
|
Net IBNR Reserves |
|
|
4,113 |
|
|
|
4,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves |
|
$ |
5,931 |
|
|
$ |
5,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
CNA COMMERCIAL
The following table details the results of operations for CNA Commercial.
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net written premiums |
|
$ |
829 |
|
|
$ |
920 |
|
Net earned premiums |
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
863 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
Net operating income |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
Net realized investment gains (losses), after-tax |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(120 |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss adjustment expense |
|
|
73.8 |
% |
|
|
71.1 |
% |
Expense |
|
|
35.6 |
|
|
|
33.5 |
|
Dividend |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
109.5 |
% |
|
|
105.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net written premiums for CNA Commercial decreased $91 million for the three months ended March
31, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009. Premiums written were unfavorably impacted by
decreased new business and lower retention as a result of competitive market conditions. Current
economic conditions have also led to decreased insured exposures, such as in the construction
industry due to smaller payrolls and reduced project volume. These conditions may continue to put
ongoing pressure on premium and income levels and the expense ratio. Net earned premiums decreased
$47 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009,
consistent with the trend of lower net written premiums.
CNA Commercials average rate increased 1% for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared
to a decrease of 1% for the three months ended March 31, 2009 for policies that renewed in each
period. Retention rates of 79% and 83% were achieved for those policies that were available for
renewal in each period.
Net results improved $160 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared with the
same period in 2009. This improvement was due to improved net realized investment results and
improved net operating income. See the Investments section of this MD&A for further discussion of
net realized investment results and net investment income.
Net operating income improved $26 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared
with the same period in 2009. This improvement was primarily driven by higher net investment
income, partially offset by higher catastrophe losses.
The combined ratio increased 4.5 points for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared with
the same period in 2009. The loss ratio increased 2.7 points primarily due to increased
catastrophe losses, partially offset by the impact of an improved current accident year
non-catastrophe loss ratio. Catastrophe losses were $38 million, or 4.7 points of the loss ratio,
for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to $12 million, or 1.4 points of the loss
ratio, for the same period in 2009. The 2009 accident year loss ratio excluding catastrophe losses
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was unfavorably impacted by several significant property
losses.
The expense ratio increased 2.1 points for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared with
the same period in 2009, primarily related to the lower net earned premium base. Underwriting
expenses were unfavorably impacted by IT Transformation costs. See the Consolidated Operations
section of this MD&A for further discussion of IT Transformation costs.
Favorable net prior year development of $7 million was recorded for the three months ended March
31, 2010, compared to favorable net prior year development of $22 million for the same period in
2009. Further information on CNA Commercial net prior year development for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009 is included in Note G of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
included under Item 1.
47
The following table summarizes the gross and net carried reserves as of March 31, 2010 and December
31, 2009 for CNA Commercial.
Gross and Net Carried
Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Gross Case Reserves |
|
$ |
6,635 |
|
|
$ |
6,510 |
|
Gross IBNR Reserves |
|
|
6,345 |
|
|
|
6,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gross Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves |
|
$ |
12,980 |
|
|
$ |
13,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Case Reserves |
|
$ |
5,398 |
|
|
$ |
5,269 |
|
Net IBNR Reserves |
|
|
5,468 |
|
|
|
5,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves |
|
$ |
10,866 |
|
|
$ |
10,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIFE & GROUP NON-CORE
The following table summarizes the results of operations for Life & Group Non-Core.
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net earned premiums |
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
$ |
150 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
Net operating income (loss) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
Net realized investment losses, after-tax |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(124 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(146 |
) |
Net earned premiums for Life & Group Non-Core decreased $5 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 as compared with the same period in 2009. Net earned premiums relate primarily to
the individual and group long term care businesses.
Net loss decreased by $143 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared with the
same period in 2009. This improvement was primarily due to improved net realized investment
results. See the Investments section of this MD&A for further discussion of net realized
investment results. In addition, favorable performance on our remaining pension deposit business
and favorable reserve development arising from a commutation of an assumed reinsurance agreement
also contributed to the improvement. Partially offsetting these favorable impacts were unfavorable
results in our long term care business.
Certain of the separate account investment contracts related to our pension deposit business
guarantee principal and an annual minimum rate of interest, for which we recorded an additional
pretax liability in Policyholders Funds during 2008 based on the results of the investments
supporting this business at that time. During the first quarter of 2009 we further increased this
pretax liability by $13 million. During the first quarter of 2010, based on improved results from
these investments, we decreased this pretax liability by $13 million.
48
CORPORATE & OTHER NON-CORE
The following table summarizes the results of operations for the Corporate & Other Non-Core
segment, including Asbestos and Environmental Pollution (A&E) and intrasegment eliminations.
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
Net operating loss |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
Net realized investment gains (losses), after-tax |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
Net results improved $38 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared with
the same period in 2009 primarily due to improved net realized investment results and higher net
investment income. See the Investments section of this MD&A for further discussion of net
investment income and net realized investment results.
Unfavorable net prior year development of $1 million was recorded for the three months ended March
31, 2010. No net prior year development was recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Further information on Corporate & Other Non-Core net prior year development for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 is included in Note G of the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements included under Item 1.
The following table summarizes the gross and net carried reserves as of March 31, 2010 and December
31, 2009 for Corporate & Other Non-Core.
Gross and Net Carried
Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Gross Case Reserves |
|
$ |
1,479 |
|
|
$ |
1,548 |
|
Gross IBNR Reserves |
|
|
2,378 |
|
|
|
2,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gross Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves |
|
$ |
3,857 |
|
|
$ |
4,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Case Reserves |
|
$ |
952 |
|
|
$ |
972 |
|
Net IBNR Reserves |
|
|
1,457 |
|
|
|
1,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves |
|
$ |
2,409 |
|
|
$ |
2,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
INVESTMENTS
Net Investment Income
The significant components of net investment income are presented in the following table.
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Fixed maturity securities |
|
$ |
510 |
|
|
$ |
475 |
|
Short term investments |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Limited partnerships |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Trading portfolio |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross investment income |
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
Investment expense |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
590 |
|
|
$ |
420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income for the three months ended March 31, 2010 increased $170 million as
compared with the same period in 2009. The increase was primarily driven by improved results from
limited partnership investments. Limited partnership investments generally present greater
volatility, higher illiquidity and greater risk than fixed income investments.
The fixed maturity investment portfolio and short term investments provided a pretax effective
income yield of 5.2% for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
Net Realized Investment Gains (Losses)
The components of net realized investment results are presented in the following table.
Net Realized Investment Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Fixed maturity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of government agencies |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(21 |
) |
Corporate and other taxable bonds |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(173 |
) |
States, municipalities and political subdivisions tax-exempt securities |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(192 |
) |
Redeemable preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturity securities |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
(358 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(216 |
) |
Derivative securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
Short term investments and other |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses), net of participating policyholders interests |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
(532 |
) |
Income tax (expense) benefit on net realized investment gains (losses) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
187 |
|
Net realized investment (gains) losses, after-tax, attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses) attributable to CNA |
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
(344 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment results improved $366 million for the three months ended March 31,
2010 compared with the same period in 2009, driven by significantly lower other-than-temporary
impairment (OTTI) losses recognized in earnings. Further information on our realized gains and
losses, including our OTTI losses and impairment decision process, is set forth in Note D of the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 1. During the second quarter of
2009, the Company adopted updated accounting guidance,
50
which amended the OTTI loss model for fixed maturity securities, as discussed in Note B of the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 1.
Our fixed maturity portfolio consists primarily of high quality bonds, 90% of which were rated as
investment grade (rated BBB- or higher) at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The
classification between investment grade and non-investment grade is based on a ratings methodology
that takes into account ratings from the three major providers, Standard & Poors (S&P), Moodys
Investors Service, Inc. (Moodys) and Fitch Ratings (Fitch) in that order of preference. If a
security is not rated by any of the three, we formulate an internal rating. For securities with
credit support from third party guarantees, the rating reflects the greater of the underlying
rating of the issuer or the insured rating.
The following table summarizes the ratings of our fixed maturity portfolio at carrying value.
Fixed Maturity Ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
% |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% |
|
U.S. Government and Agencies |
|
$ |
3,799 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
$ |
3,705 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
AAA rated |
|
|
5,514 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
5,855 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
AA and A rated |
|
|
13,655 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
12,464 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
BBB rated |
|
|
10,976 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
10,122 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Non-investment grade |
|
|
3,767 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
3,466 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
37,711 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
35,612 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-investment grade fixed maturity securities, as presented in the table below, include
high-yield securities rated below BBB- by bond rating agencies and other unrated securities that,
according to our analysis, are below investment grade. Non-investment grade securities generally
involve a greater degree of risk than investment grade securities. The amortized cost of our
non-investment grade fixed maturity bond portfolio was $3,859 million and $3,637 million at March
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The following table summarizes the ratings of this portfolio at
carrying value.
Non-investment Grade
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating |
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
% |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
% |
|
BB |
|
$ |
1,332 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
|
$ |
1,352 |
|
|
|
39 |
% |
B |
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
1,255 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
CCC C |
|
|
1,082 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
D |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,767 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
3,466 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included within the fixed maturity portfolio are securities that contain credit support from
third party guarantees from mono-line insurers. At March 31, 2010, $540 million of the carrying
value of the fixed maturity portfolio had a third party guarantee that increased the underlying
average rating of those securities from A+ to AA+. Of this amount, over 98% was within the
tax-exempt bond segment.
At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, approximately 99% of the fixed maturity portfolio was
issued by the U.S. Government and Agencies or was rated by S&P or Moodys. The remaining bonds
were rated by other rating agencies or internally.
The carrying value of fixed maturity and equity securities that are either subject to trading
restrictions or trade in illiquid private placement markets at March 31, 2010 was $181 million,
which represents less than 0.5% of our total investment portfolio. These securities were in a net
unrealized gain position of $8 million at March 31, 2010.
51
The following table provides the composition of available-for-sale fixed maturity securities in a
gross unrealized loss position at March 31, 2010 by maturity profile. Securities not due at a
single date are allocated based on weighted average life.
Maturity Profile
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Unrealized Loss |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duration
A primary objective in the management of the fixed maturity and equity portfolios is to optimize
return relative to underlying liabilities and respective liquidity needs. Our views on the current
interest rate environment, tax regulations, asset class valuations, specific security issuer and
broader industry segment conditions, and the domestic and global economic conditions, are some of
the factors that enter into an investment decision. We also continually monitor exposure to
issuers of securities held and broader industry sector exposures and may from time to time adjust
such exposures based on our views of a specific issuer or industry sector.
A further consideration in the management of the investment portfolio is the characteristics of the
underlying liabilities and the ability to align the duration of the portfolio to those liabilities
to meet future liquidity needs, minimize interest rate risk and maintain a level of income
sufficient to support the underlying insurance liabilities. For portfolios where future liability
cash flows are determinable and typically long term in nature, we segregate investments for
asset/liability management purposes. The segregated investments support liabilities primarily in
the Life & Group Non-Core segment including annuities, structured benefit settlements and long term
care products.
The effective durations of fixed maturity securities, short term investments, non-redeemable
preferred stocks and interest rate derivatives are presented in the table below. Short term
investments are net of securities lending collateral, if any, and accounts payable and receivable
amounts for securities purchased and sold, but not yet settled.
Effective Durations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective Duration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective Duration |
|
(In millions) |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
(In years) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
(In years) |
|
Segregated investments |
|
$ |
10,830 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
$ |
10,376 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
Other interest sensitive investments |
|
|
29,855 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
29,665 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair Value |
|
$ |
40,685 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
$ |
40,041 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The investment portfolio is periodically analyzed for changes in duration and related price
change risk. Additionally, we periodically review the sensitivity of the portfolio to the level of
foreign exchange rates and other factors that contribute to market price changes. A summary of
these risks and specific analysis on changes is included in the Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk in Item 7A of our 2009 Form 10-K.
52
Asset-Backed Exposure
Asset-Backed Distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
Security Type |
|
(In millions) |
|
RMBS (a) |
|
|
CMBS (b) |
|
|
Other ABS (c) |
|
|
Total |
|
U.S. Government Agencies |
|
$ |
3,536 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,570 |
|
AAA |
|
|
1,416 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
2,310 |
|
AA |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
522 |
|
A |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
BBB |
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
513 |
|
Non-investment grade and equity tranches |
|
|
1,228 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair Value |
|
$ |
6,937 |
|
|
$ |
729 |
|
|
$ |
809 |
|
|
$ |
8,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Amortized Cost |
|
$ |
7,303 |
|
|
$ |
820 |
|
|
$ |
811 |
|
|
$ |
8,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-prime (included above) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
$ |
624 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
624 |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
$ |
706 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alt-A (included above) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
$ |
668 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
668 |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
$ |
762 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
762 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) |
|
(b) |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) |
|
(c) |
|
Other asset-backed securities (Other ABS) |
The exposure to sub-prime residential mortgage (sub-prime) collateral and Alternative A
residential mortgages that have lower than normal standards of loan documentation (Alt-A)
collateral is measured by the original deal structure. Of the securities with sub-prime exposure,
approximately 64% were rated investment grade, while 82% of the Alt-A securities were rated
investment grade. At March 31, 2010, $7 million of the carrying value of the sub-prime and Alt-A
securities carried a third-party guarantee.
Pretax OTTI losses of $6 million for securities with sub-prime and Alt-A exposure were included in
the $28 million of pretax OTTI losses related to asset-backed securities recognized in earnings on
the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Continued deterioration in the underlying collateral beyond our current expectations may cause us
to reconsider and recognize additional OTTI losses in earnings. See Note D of the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 1 for additional information related to
unrealized losses on asset-backed securities.
Short Term Investments
The carrying value of the components of the short term investment portfolio is presented in the
following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short Term Investments |
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Short term investments available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper |
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
$ |
185 |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
3,025 |
|
Money market funds |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
Other |
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short term investments |
|
$ |
2,484 |
|
|
$ |
3,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There was no cash collateral held related to securities lending at March 31, 2010 or December
31, 2009.
53
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flows
Our principal operating cash flow sources are premiums and investment income from our insurance
subsidiaries. Our primary operating cash flow uses are payments for claims, policy benefits and
operating expenses.
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, net cash provided by operating activities was $364
million as compared with $187 million for the same period in 2009. Cash provided by operating
activities was favorably impacted by increased investment income receipts in the first quarter of
2010 as compared with the same period in 2009. Additionally, during the second quarter of 2009 we
resumed the use of a trading portfolio for income enhancement purposes. Because cash receipts and
cash payments resulting from purchases and sales of trading securities are reported as cash flows
related to operating activities, operating cash flows were increased by $99 million related to net
activities of trading securities at March 31, 2010.
Cash flows from investing activities include the purchase and sale of available-for-sale financial
instruments. Additionally, cash flows from investing activities may include the purchase and sale
of businesses, land, buildings, equipment and other assets not generally held for resale.
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, net cash used by investing activities was $369 million
as compared with $150 million for the same period in 2009. Investing cash flows related
principally to purchases and sales of fixed maturity securities and short term investments. The
cash flow from investing activities is impacted by various factors such as the anticipated payment
of claims, financing activity, asset/liability management and individual security buy and sell
decisions made in the normal course of portfolio management.
Cash flows from financing activities include proceeds from the issuance of debt and equity
securities, outflows for dividends or repayment of debt, outlays to reacquire equity instruments,
and deposits and withdrawals related to investment contract products issued by us.
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, net cash used by financing activities was $38 million as
compared with $26 million for the same period in 2009. Net cash used by financing activities in
2010 and 2009 was primarily related to the payment of dividends on the 2008 Senior Preferred Stock
to Loews Corporation.
Liquidity
We believe that our present cash flows from operations, investing activities and financing
activities are sufficient to fund our current and expected working capital and debt obligation
needs and we do not expect this to change in the near term.
We have an effective automatic shelf registration statement under which we may issue debt, equity
or hybrid securities.
54
Accounting Standards Updates
For discussion of accounting standards updates that have been adopted or will be adopted in the
future, see Note B of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 1.
Proposed Clarification of the Definition of Deferred Acquisition Costs of Insurance Entities
In December 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board Emerging Issues Task Force (FASB EITF)
issued a proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU), which would limit the capitalization of costs
incurred to acquire or renew insurance contracts to those that are directly related to successful
contract acquisitions. In March 2010, the FASB EITF generally reaffirmed its consensus for
exposure, but continues to discuss its proposal that the ASU be effective for reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2010. Final issuance is expected in June 2010. We have not
quantified the impact of potential adoption, but expect that amounts capitalized under the proposed
guidance would be less than under our current accounting practice.
55
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains a number of forward-looking statements which relate to anticipated future
events rather than actual present conditions or historical events. These statements are made
pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and
generally include words such as believes, expects, intends, anticipates, estimates, and
similar expressions. Forward-looking statements in this report include any and all statements
regarding expected developments in our insurance business, including losses and loss reserves for
asbestos and environmental pollution and other mass tort claims which are more uncertain, and
therefore more difficult to estimate than loss reserves respecting traditional property and
casualty exposures; the impact of routine ongoing insurance reserve reviews we are conducting; our
expectations concerning our revenues, earnings, expenses and investment activities; expected cost
savings and other results from our expense reduction activities; and our proposed actions in
response to trends in our business. Forward-looking statements, by their nature, are subject to a
variety of inherent risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially
from the results projected in the forward-looking statement. We cannot control many of these risks
and uncertainties. Some examples of these risks and uncertainties are:
|
|
conditions in the capital and credit markets, including continuing uncertainty and
instability in these markets, as well as the overall economy, and their impact on the returns,
types, liquidity and valuation of our investments; |
|
|
|
general economic and business conditions, including recessionary conditions that
may decrease the size and number of our insurance customers and create additional losses to
our lines of business, especially those that provide management and professional liability
insurance, as well as surety bonds, to businesses engaged in real estate, financial services
and professional services, and inflationary pressures on medical care costs, construction
costs and other economic sectors that increase the severity of claims; |
|
|
|
the effects of failures in the financial services industry, as well as
irregularities in financial reporting and other corporate governance matters, on the markets
for directors and officers and errors and omissions coverages, as well as on capital and
credit markets; |
|
|
|
changes in foreign or domestic political, social and economic conditions; |
|
|
|
regulatory initiatives and compliance with governmental regulations, judicial
decisions, including interpretation of policy provisions, decisions regarding coverage and
theories of liability, trends in litigation and the outcome of any litigation involving us,
and rulings and changes in tax laws and regulations; |
|
|
|
regulatory limitations, impositions and restrictions upon us, including the
effects of assessments and other surcharges for guaranty funds and second-injury funds, other
mandatory pooling arrangements and future assessments levied on insurance companies and other
financial industry participants under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008
recoupment provisions; |
|
|
|
the impact of competitive products, policies and pricing and the competitive
environment in which we operate, including changes in our book of business; |
|
|
|
product and policy availability and demand and market responses, including the
level of ability to obtain rate increases and decline or non-renew under priced accounts, to
achieve premium targets and profitability and to realize growth and retention estimates; |
|
|
|
development of claims and the impact on loss reserves, including changes in claim
settlement policies; |
|
|
|
the assertion of public nuisance theories of liability, pursuant to which
plaintiffs seek to recover monies spent to administer public health care programs and/or to
abate hazards to public health and safety; |
|
|
|
the effectiveness of current initiatives by claims management to reduce loss and
expense ratios through more efficacious claims handling techniques; |
|
|
|
the performance of reinsurance companies under reinsurance contracts with us; |
|
|
|
conditions in the capital and credit markets that may limit our ability to raise
significant amounts of capital on favorable terms, as well as restrictions on the ability or
willingness of Loews to provide additional capital support to us; |
56
|
|
weather and other natural physical events, including the severity and frequency of
storms, hail, snowfall and other winter conditions, natural disasters such as hurricanes and
earthquakes, as well as climate change, including effects on weather patterns, greenhouse
gases, sea, land and air temperatures, sea levels, rain and snow; |
|
|
|
regulatory requirements imposed by coastal state regulators in the wake of
hurricanes or other natural disasters, including limitations on the ability to exit markets or
to non-renew, cancel or change terms and conditions in policies, as well as mandatory
assessments to fund any shortfalls arising from the inability of quasi-governmental insurers
to pay claims; |
|
|
|
man-made disasters, including the possible occurrence of terrorist attacks and the
effect of the absence or insufficiency of applicable terrorism legislation on coverages; |
|
|
|
the unpredictability of the nature, targets, severity or frequency of potential
terrorist events, as well as the uncertainty as to our ability to contain our terrorism
exposure effectively, notwithstanding the extension through December 31, 2014 of the Terrorism
Risk Insurance Act of 2002; |
|
|
|
the occurrence of epidemics; |
|
|
|
exposure to liabilities due to claims made by insureds and others relating to
asbestos remediation and health-based asbestos impairments, as well as exposure to liabilities
for environmental pollution, construction defect claims and exposure to liabilities due to
claims made by insureds and others relating to lead-based paint and other mass torts; |
|
|
|
the risks and uncertainties associated with our loss reserves, as outlined in the
Critical Accounting Estimates and the Reserves Estimates and Uncertainties sections of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the sufficiency of the reserves and the possibility for
future increases; |
|
|
|
regulatory limitations and restrictions, including limitations upon our ability to
receive dividends from our insurance subsidiaries imposed by state regulatory agencies and
minimum risk-based capital standards established by the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners; |
|
|
|
the possibility of changes in our ratings by ratings agencies, including the
inability to access certain markets or distribution channels and the required
collateralization of future payment obligations as a result of such changes, and changes in
rating agency policies and practices; and |
|
|
|
the actual closing of contemplated transactions and agreements. |
Our forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made and we do not
undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement to reflect events or
circumstances after the date of the statement, even if our expectations or any related events or
circumstances change.
57
CNA Financial Corporation
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There were no material changes in our market risk components for the three months ended March 31,
2010. See the Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk included in Item 7A of
our Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31,
2009 for further information. Additional information related to portfolio duration is discussed in
the Investments section of the Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations included in Part I, Item 2.
58
CNA Financial Corporation
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures which are designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits to the
Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), including this report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely
basis. These disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to
the Companys management on a timely basis to allow decisions regarding required disclosure.
As of March 31, 2010, the Companys management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer
(CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
There has been no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal
control over financial reporting.
59
CNA Financial Corporation
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Information on our legal proceedings is set forth in Notes G and H of the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements included under Part I, Item 1.
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
Exhibit Number |
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated March 3, 2010, by and between CNA
Financial Corporation and Thomas F. Motamed |
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
31.1 |
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
31.2 |
|
|
|
Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer of CNA Financial Corporation Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) |
|
32.1 |
|
|
|
Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer of CNA Financial Corporation Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) |
|
32.2 |
60
CNA Financial Corporation
Part II. Other Information
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CNA Financial Corporation
|
|
Dated: May 3, 2010 |
By |
/s/ D. Craig Mense
|
|
|
|
D. Craig Mense |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer |
|
61