e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 001-31720
PIPER JAFFRAY COMPANIES
(Exact Name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
DELAWARE |
|
30-0168701 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of |
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
Incorporation or Organization) |
|
|
|
|
|
800 Nicollet Mall, Suite 800 |
|
|
Minneapolis, Minnesota |
|
55402 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
(612) 303-6000
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer: þ |
|
Accelerated filer: o |
|
Non-accelerated filer: o |
|
Smaller reporting company: o |
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 12b-2). Yes o No þ
As of May 3, 2010, the registrant had 20,758,423 shares of Common Stock outstanding.
Piper Jaffray Companies
Index to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Piper Jaffray Companies
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
(Amounts in thousands, except share data) |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
40,483 |
|
|
$ |
43,942 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents segregated for regulatory purposes |
|
|
8,006 |
|
|
|
9,006 |
|
Receivables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers |
|
|
48,713 |
|
|
|
71,859 |
|
Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations |
|
|
185,838 |
|
|
|
244,051 |
|
Deposits with clearing organizations |
|
|
26,439 |
|
|
|
18,010 |
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
366,284 |
|
|
|
149,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned |
|
|
547,456 |
|
|
|
662,618 |
|
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned and pledged as collateral |
|
|
397,545 |
|
|
|
137,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions owned |
|
|
945,001 |
|
|
|
799,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets (net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $61,266 and $59,563, respectively) |
|
|
16,022 |
|
|
|
16,596 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
317,034 |
|
|
|
164,625 |
|
Intangible assets (net of accumulated amortization of $11,662 and $10,686, respectively) |
|
|
66,050 |
|
|
|
12,067 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
40,890 |
|
|
|
33,868 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
126,112 |
|
|
|
139,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,186,872 |
|
|
$ |
1,703,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term financing |
|
$ |
93,520 |
|
|
$ |
90,079 |
|
Variable rate senior notes |
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
Payables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers |
|
|
40,458 |
|
|
|
48,179 |
|
Checks and drafts |
|
|
6,235 |
|
|
|
8,622 |
|
Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations |
|
|
59,668 |
|
|
|
71,818 |
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
451,585 |
|
|
|
36,134 |
|
Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased |
|
|
493,395 |
|
|
|
335,795 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
36,090 |
|
|
|
157,022 |
|
Other liabilities and accrued expenses |
|
|
47,498 |
|
|
|
57,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,348,449 |
|
|
|
924,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares authorized: 100,000,000 at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued: 19,504,948 at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares outstanding: 16,046,337 at March 31, 2010 and 15,633,690 at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
843,786 |
|
|
|
803,553 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
155,703 |
|
|
|
155,193 |
|
Less common stock held in treasury, at cost: 3,458,611 shares at March 31, 2010 and
3,871,258 shares at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
(161,728 |
) |
|
|
(181,443 |
) |
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
1,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
838,423 |
|
|
|
778,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
2,186,872 |
|
|
$ |
1,703,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
3
Piper Jaffray Companies
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment banking |
|
$ |
43,748 |
|
|
$ |
24,350 |
|
Institutional brokerage |
|
|
49,095 |
|
|
|
55,027 |
|
Interest |
|
|
11,120 |
|
|
|
7,288 |
|
Asset management |
|
|
9,154 |
|
|
|
3,009 |
|
Other income/(loss) |
|
|
2,927 |
|
|
|
(3,599 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
116,044 |
|
|
|
86,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
6,458 |
|
|
|
2,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
109,586 |
|
|
|
83,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
65,096 |
|
|
|
50,324 |
|
Occupancy and equipment |
|
|
7,669 |
|
|
|
6,518 |
|
Communications |
|
|
6,489 |
|
|
|
6,099 |
|
Floor brokerage and clearance |
|
|
2,617 |
|
|
|
2,882 |
|
Marketing and business development |
|
|
5,322 |
|
|
|
4,445 |
|
Outside services |
|
|
8,004 |
|
|
|
7,519 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
5,234 |
|
|
|
2,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expenses |
|
|
100,431 |
|
|
|
80,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
9,155 |
|
|
|
3,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
8,645 |
|
|
|
6,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
$ |
510 |
|
|
$ |
(2,725 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
409 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per basic common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings/(loss) per basic common share |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per diluted common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings/(loss) per diluted common share |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.17 |
) (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
15,837 |
|
|
|
15,868 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
15,924 |
|
|
|
15,868 |
(1) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In accordance with ASC 260, earnings per diluted common share is calculated using the basic
weighted average number of common shares outstanding in periods a loss is incurred. |
|
N/A - Not applicable as no allocation of income was made due to loss position. |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
4
Piper Jaffray Companies
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
$ |
510 |
|
|
$ |
(2,725 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) to net cash provided by/(used in)
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets |
|
|
1,847 |
|
|
|
1,763 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
16,133 |
|
|
|
13,762 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
27,187 |
|
|
|
6,837 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
976 |
|
|
|
614 |
|
Decrease/(increase) in operating assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents segregated for regulatory purposes |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
(7,001 |
) |
Receivables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers |
|
|
23,569 |
|
|
|
(7,018 |
) |
Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations |
|
|
58,170 |
|
|
|
61,225 |
|
Deposits with clearing organizations |
|
|
(8,429 |
) |
|
|
(9,084 |
) |
Securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
(216,602 |
) |
|
|
15,211 |
|
Securitized municipal tender option bonds |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
45,740 |
|
Net financial instruments and other inventory positions owned |
|
|
12,519 |
|
|
|
(81,423 |
) |
Other receivables |
|
|
1,733 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(2,417 |
) |
|
|
34,062 |
|
Increase/(decrease) in operating liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers |
|
|
(7,681 |
) |
|
|
7,778 |
|
Checks and drafts |
|
|
(2,387 |
) |
|
|
250 |
|
Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations |
|
|
(8,976 |
) |
|
|
86,550 |
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
Tender option bond trust certificates |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(49,267 |
) |
Accrued compensation |
|
|
(111,806 |
) |
|
|
(45,442 |
) |
Other liabilities and accrued expenses |
|
|
(12,407 |
) |
|
|
(12,735 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities |
|
|
(227,261 |
) |
|
|
59,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business acquisition, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(181,906 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Purchases of fixed assets, net |
|
|
(952 |
) |
|
|
(431 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(182,858 |
) |
|
|
(431 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in securities loaned |
|
|
(3,652 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Increase/(decrease) in securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
415,651 |
|
|
|
(102,756 |
) |
Increase in short-term financing |
|
|
3,441 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(8,316 |
) |
|
|
(4,074 |
) |
Reduced tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2,941 |
) |
Proceeds from stock option transactions |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities |
|
|
407,222 |
|
|
|
(59,771 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency adjustment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(562 |
) |
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(3,459 |
) |
|
|
(846 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
43,942 |
|
|
|
49,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
40,483 |
|
|
$ |
49,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid/(received) during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
6,089 |
|
|
$ |
1,962 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
257 |
|
|
$ |
(36,642 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing activities - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock for acquisition of Advisory Research Holdings, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
893,105 shares for the three months ended March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
31,822 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash financing activities - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock for retirement plan obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,696 shares and 134,700 shares for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively |
|
$ |
3,634 |
|
|
$ |
3,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted common stock for annual equity award: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
699,673 shares and 585,198 shares for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively |
|
$ |
31,121 |
|
|
$ |
16,331 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
5
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 Background
Piper Jaffray Companies is the parent company of Piper Jaffray & Co. (Piper Jaffray), a
securities broker dealer and investment banking firm; Piper Jaffray Ltd., a firm providing
securities brokerage and investment banking services in Europe headquartered in London, England;
Piper Jaffray Asia Holdings Limited, an entity providing investment banking services in China
headquartered in Hong Kong; Fiduciary Asset Management, LLC (FAMCO) and Advisory Research
Holdings, Inc. (ARI), entities providing asset management services to separately managed
accounts, closed end funds and partnerships; Piper Jaffray Financial Products Inc., Piper Jaffray
Financial Products II Inc. and Piper Jaffray Financial Products III Inc., entities that facilitate
derivative transactions; and other immaterial subsidiaries. Piper Jaffray Companies and its
subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) currently operate as one reporting segment providing
investment banking services, institutional sales, trading and research services, and asset
management services. Beginning in the second quarter of 2010, the Company will provide segment
results for capital markets and asset management.
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Piper Jaffray Companies, its wholly
owned subsidiaries and other entities in which the Company has a controlling financial interest.
All material intercompany balances have been eliminated. Certain financial information for prior
periods has been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) with respect to Form 10-Q and reflect
all adjustments that in the opinion of management are normal and recurring and that are necessary
for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. In accordance with these
rules and regulations, certain disclosures that are normally included in annual financial
statements have been omitted. The consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included
in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. These principles require management to make certain estimates and
assumptions that may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the
consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The nature of the Companys
business is such that the results of any interim period may not be indicative of the results to be
expected for a full year.
Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Refer to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, for a full
description of the Companys significant accounting policies. Changes to the Companys significant
accounting policies are described below.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Piper Jaffray Companies, its wholly
owned subsidiaries, and all other entities in which the Company has a controlling financial
interest. All material intercompany balances have been eliminated. The Company determines whether
it has a controlling financial interest in an entity by first evaluating whether the entity is a
voting interest entity or a variable interest entity (VIE).
Voting interest entities are entities in which the total equity investment at risk is sufficient to
enable each entity to finance itself independently and provides the equity holders with the
obligation to absorb losses, the right to receive residual returns and the right or power to make
decisions about or direct the entitys activities that most significantly impact the entitys
economic performance. Voting interest entities, where we have a majority interest, are consolidated
in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification
Topic 810, Consolidations (ASC 810). ASC 810 states that the usual condition for a controlling
financial interest in an entity is ownership of a majority voting interest. Accordingly, the
Company consolidates voting interest entities in which it has all, or a majority of, the voting
interest.
As defined in ASC 810, VIEs are entities that lack one or more of the characteristics of a voting
interest entity described above. With the exception of entities eligible for the deferral codified
in FASB Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-10,
6
Consolidation: Amendments for Certain Investment Funds, (ASU 2010-10) (generally asset managers
and investment companies); ASC 810 states that a controlling financial interest in an entity is
present when an enterprise has a variable interest, or combination of variable interests, that have
both the power to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entitys
economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the rights to receive
benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the entity. Accordingly, the
Company consolidates VIEs in which the Company has a controlling financial interest.
Entities meeting the deferral provision defined by ASU 2010-10 are evaluated under the historical
VIE guidance. Under the historical guidance, a controlling financial interest in an entity is
present when an enterprise has a variable interest, or combination of variable interests, that will
absorb a majority of the entitys expected losses, receive a majority of the entitys expected
residual returns, or both. The enterprise with a controlling financial interest, known as the
primary beneficiary, consolidates the VIE. Accordingly, the Company consolidates VIEs subject to
the deferral provisions defined by ASU 2010-10 in which the Company is deemed to be the primary
beneficiary.
When the Company does not have a controlling financial interest in an entity but exerts significant
influence over the entitys operating and financial policies (generally defined as owning a voting
or economic interest of between 20 percent to 50 percent), the Company accounts for its investment
in accordance with the equity method of accounting prescribed by FASB Accounting Standards
Codification Topic 323, Investments Equity Method and Joint Ventures (ASC 323). If the
Company does not have a controlling financial interest in, or exert significant influence over, an
entity, the Company accounts for its investment at cost.
Note 3 Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Adoption of New Accounting Standards
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets
In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance amending the Accounting Standards Codification Topic 860,
Transfers and Servicing, (ASC 860) designed to improve the relevance, representational
faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its
financial statements about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its
financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferors continuing
involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. Additionally, the new guidance eliminates the
qualifying special-purpose entity (QSPE) concept. The updates were effective for the Company
January 1, 2010. The recognition and measurement provisions were effective for prospective
transfers with the exception of existing QSPEs which must be evaluated at the time of adoption. The
disclosures required by ASC 860 are applied to both retrospective and prospective transfers. The
adoption of ASC 860 did not have an impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
In June 2009, the FASB updated the accounting standards related to the consolidation of variable
interest entities (VIE). The standard requires, among other things, a qualitative rather than
quantitative analysis to determine the primary beneficiary (PB) of the VIE, continuous
assessments of whether the entity is the PB of the VIE, and enhanced disclosures about involvement
with VIEs. This standard was effective for the Company January 1, 2010 and is applicable to all
entities with which the enterprise has involvement, regardless of when that involvement arose. The
adoption of the new standard did not have an impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-10, which addresses the application of the amendments to
VIE consolidation described above by reporting entities in the asset management industry by
deferring the effective date of the standards new recognition and measurement requirements for
certain investment funds. However, the standards new disclosure requirements will continue to
apply to all entities. ASU 2010-10 was effective for the Company January 1, 2010. The adoption of
this standard led to the deferral of the application of the updated consolidation guidance in ASC
810 to certain of the Companys investment funds within the scope of ASU 2010-10.
Fair Value Measurements
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value
Measurements, (ASU 2010-06) amending FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820, Fair
Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820). The amended guidance requires entities to disclose
additional information regarding assets and liabilities that are transferred between
7
levels of the fair value hierarchy and to disclose information in the Level III rollforward about
purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis. ASU 2010-06 also further clarifies
existing guidance pertaining to the level of disaggregation at which fair value disclosures should
be made and the requirements to disclose information about the valuation techniques and inputs used
in estimating Level II and Level III fair value measurements. The guidance in ASU 2010-06 was
effective for the Company January 1, 2010, except for the requirement to separately disclose
purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis in the Level III rollforward, which
becomes effective for fiscal years (and for interim periods within those fiscal years) beginning
after December 15, 2010. While the adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not change accounting requirements,
it did impact the Companys disclosures about fair value measurements.
Note 4 Acquisition of Advisory Research Holdings, Inc.
On March 1, 2010, the Company completed the purchase of all the issued and outstanding shares of
common stock, junior subordinated debentures, senior subordinated notes and promissory notes of
Advisory Research Holdings, Inc. (ARI), an asset management firm based in Chicago, Illinois. The
acquisition expanded the Companys existing asset management business supporting the Companys
strategy of diversifying its revenues. The purchase was completed pursuant to the securities
purchase agreement dated December 20, 2009. The fair value as of the acquisition date was $211.9
million, consisting of $180.1 million in cash and 893,105 shares (881,846 of which vest ratably
over four years) of the Companys common stock valued at $31.8 million. The fair value of the
881,846 shares of common stock with vesting restrictions was determined using the market price of
the Companys common stock on the date of the acquisition discounted for the liquidity restrictions
in accordance with the valuation principles of ASC 820. The remaining 11,259 shares have no vesting
restrictions and the fair value was determined using the market price of the Companys common stock
on the date of the acquisition. A portion of the purchase price payable in cash was funded by
proceeds from the issuance of variable rate senior notes (Notes) in the amount of $120 million
pursuant to the note purchase agreement (Note Purchase Agreement) dated December 31, 2009 with
certain entities advised by Pacific Investment Management Company LLC (PIMCO).
The acquisition was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with
FASB ASC 805, Business Combinations. Accordingly, goodwill was measured as the excess of the
acquisition-date fair value of the consideration transferred over the amount of acquisition-date
identifiable assets acquired net of assumed liabilities. The Company recorded $152.4 million of
goodwill as an asset in the consolidated statement of financial condition, which is expected to be
deductible for tax purposes. The final goodwill recorded on the Companys consolidated statement of
financial condition may differ from that reflected herein as a result of measurement period
adjustments. In managements opinion, the goodwill represents the reputation and expertise of ARI
in the asset management business.
Identifiable intangible assets purchased by the Company consisted of customer relationships and the
ARI trade name with acquisition-date fair values of $52.1 million and $2.9 million, respectively.
Acquisition costs of $1.5 million were incurred in the fourth quarter of 2009 and $44,000 of
acquisition costs were incurred in the three months ended March 31, 2010, and are included in
outside services on the consolidated statement of operations.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed
at the date of the acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,008 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
8,861 |
|
Fixed assets |
|
|
377 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
152,382 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
54,959 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
|
218,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
149 |
|
Other liabilities and accrued expenses |
|
|
6,744 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed |
|
|
6,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
211,938 |
|
|
|
|
8
ARIs results of operations have been included in the Companys financial statements prospectively
beginning on the date of acquisition. Since the date of acquisition, ARI had net revenues of $4.5
million and net income of $1.2 million. The following unaudited pro forma financial data assumes
the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of each period presented. Pro forma results have
been prepared by adjusting the Companys historical results to include ARIs results of operations
adjusted for the following changes: depreciation and amortization expenses were adjusted as a
result of acquisition-date fair value adjustments to fixed assets, intangible assets, deferred
acquisition costs and lease obligations; interest expense was adjusted for revised debt structures;
and the income tax effect of applying the Companys statutory tax rates to ARIs results. The
unaudited pro forma information presented does not necessarily reflect the results of operations
that would have resulted had the acquisition been completed at the beginning of the applicable
periods presented, nor does it indicate the results of operations in future periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Net revenues |
|
$ |
117,631 |
|
|
$ |
90,724 |
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
$ |
2,257 |
|
|
$ |
(2,135 |
) |
|
|
|
Note 5 |
|
Financial Instruments and Other Inventory Positions Owned and Financial Instruments and
Other Inventory Positions Sold, but Not Yet Purchased |
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned and financial instruments and other
inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
2,421 |
|
|
$ |
3,070 |
|
Convertible securities |
|
|
70,431 |
|
|
|
75,295 |
|
Fixed income securities |
|
|
138,158 |
|
|
|
112,825 |
|
Municipal securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable securities |
|
|
242,128 |
|
|
|
151,144 |
|
Tax-exempt securities |
|
|
118,826 |
|
|
|
147,809 |
|
Short-term securities |
|
|
76,029 |
|
|
|
25,204 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
44,121 |
|
|
|
70,425 |
|
U.S. government agency securities |
|
|
204,039 |
|
|
|
125,576 |
|
U.S. government securities |
|
|
25,121 |
|
|
|
70,111 |
|
Derivative contracts |
|
|
23,727 |
|
|
|
18,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
945,001 |
|
|
$ |
799,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold,
but not yet purchased: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
40,140 |
|
|
$ |
26,474 |
|
Convertible securities |
|
|
3,737 |
|
|
|
3,678 |
|
Fixed income securities |
|
|
112,479 |
|
|
|
122,339 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
6,299 |
|
|
|
8,937 |
|
U.S. government agency securities |
|
|
92,281 |
|
|
|
67,001 |
|
U.S. government securities |
|
|
231,755 |
|
|
|
102,911 |
|
Derivative contracts |
|
|
6,704 |
|
|
|
4,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
493,395 |
|
|
$ |
335,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
At March 31, 2010, and December 31, 2009, financial instruments and other inventory positions
owned in the amount of $397.5 million and $137.4 million, respectively, had been
pledged as collateral for the Companys repurchase agreements, secured borrowings and securities
loaned.
Inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased represent obligations of the Company to deliver the
specified security at the contracted price, thereby creating a liability to purchase the security
in the market at prevailing prices. The Company is obligated to acquire the securities sold short
at prevailing market prices, which may exceed the amount reflected on the consolidated statements
of financial condition. The Company economically hedges changes in market value of its financial
instruments and other inventory positions owned utilizing inventory positions sold, but not yet
purchased, interest rate derivatives, futures and exchange-traded options.
Derivative Contract Financial Instruments
The Company uses interest rate swaps, interest rate locks, and forward contracts to facilitate
customer transactions and as a means to manage risk in certain inventory positions. The following
describes the Companys derivatives by the type of transaction or security the instruments are
economically hedging.
Customer matched-book derivatives: The Company enters into interest rate derivative contracts in a
principal capacity as a dealer to satisfy the financial needs of its customers. The Company
simultaneously enters into an interest rate derivative contract with a third party for the same
notional amount to hedge the interest rate risk of the initial client interest rate derivative
contract. In certain limited instances, the Company has not entered into a hedging arrangement with
a third party, and retains uncollateralized credit risk as described below. The instruments use
interest rates based upon either the London Interbank Offer Rate (LIBOR) index or the Securities
Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) index.
Trading securities derivatives: The Company enters into interest rate derivative contracts to hedge
interest rate and market value risks associated with its fixed income securities. The instruments
use interest rates based upon either the Municipal Market Data (MMD) index or the SIFMA index.
The following table presents the total absolute notional contract amount associated with the
Companys outstanding derivative instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
Derivative Instrument |
|
Derivative Category |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Customer matched-book |
|
Interest rate derivative contract |
|
$ |
6,676,105 |
|
|
$ |
6,795,186 |
|
Trading securities |
|
Interest rate derivative contract |
|
|
229,500 |
|
|
|
234,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,905,605 |
|
|
$ |
7,029,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys interest rate derivative contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting, therefore,
unrealized gains and losses are recorded on the consolidated statements of operations. The
following table presents the Companys unrealized gains/(losses) on derivative instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
Derivative Category |
|
Revenue Category |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
March 31, 2009 |
Interest rate derivative contract |
|
Institutional brokerage |
|
$ |
(1,041 |
) |
|
$ |
9,716 |
|
The gross fair market value of all derivative instruments and their location on the Companys
consolidated statements of financial condition prior to counterparty netting are shown below by
asset or liability position (1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
Asset Value at |
|
|
|
Liability Value at |
Derivative Category |
|
Financial Condition Location |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
Financial Condition Location |
|
March 31, 2010 |
Interest rate derivative contract
|
|
Financial intruments and
other inventory positions
owned
|
|
$ |
301,218 |
|
|
Financial intruments and
other inventory positions
sold, but not yet purchased
|
|
$ |
267,161 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Amounts are disclosed at gross fair value in accordance with the requirement of FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, (ASC 815). |
10
The Companys derivative contracts are recorded at fair value. These derivatives are valued
using pricing models based on the net present value of estimated future cash flows. The valuation
models inputs include contractual terms, market prices, yield curves, credit curves and measures of
volatility. Derivatives are reported on a net basis by counterparty when legal right of offset
exists, and on a net basis by cross product when applicable provisions are stated in master netting
agreements. Cash collateral received or paid is netted on a counterparty basis, provided a legal
right of offset exists.
Credit risk associated with the Companys derivatives is the risk that a derivative counterparty
will not perform in accordance with the terms of the applicable derivative contract. Credit
exposure associated with the Companys derivatives is driven by uncollateralized market movements
in the fair value of the contracts with counterparties and is monitored regularly by its market and
credit risk committee. The Company reflects counterparty credit risk in calculating derivative
contract fair value. The majority of the Companys derivative contracts are substantially
collateralized by its counterparties, which are major financial institutions. The Company has a
limited number of counterparties who are not required to post collateral. Based on market
movements, the uncollateralized amounts representing the fair value of the derivative contract can
become material, exposing the Company to the credit risk of these counterparties. As of March 31,
2010, the Company had $16.3 million of uncollateralized credit exposure with these counterparties
(notional contract amount of $270.5 million), including $9.0 million of uncollateralized credit
exposure with one counterparty.
Note 6 Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company records financial instruments and other inventory positions owned and financial
instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased at fair value on the
consolidated statements of financial condition with unrealized gains and losses reflected in the
consolidated statements of operations.
The degree of judgment used in measuring the fair value of financial instruments generally
correlates to the level of pricing observability. Pricing observability is impacted by a number of
factors, including the type of financial instrument, whether the financial instrument is new to the
market and not yet established and other characteristics specific to the instrument. Financial
instruments with readily available active quoted prices for which fair value can be measured from
actively quoted prices generally will have a higher degree of pricing observability and a lesser
degree of judgment used in measuring fair value. Conversely, financial instruments rarely traded or
not quoted will generally have less, or no, pricing observability and a higher degree of judgment
used in measuring fair value.
The following is a description of the valuation techniques used to measure fair value.
Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents include highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less.
Actively traded money market funds are measured at their net asset value and classified as Level I.
Financial Instruments and Other Inventory Positions Owned
Equity securities Equity securities are valued based on quoted prices from the exchange for
identical assets or liabilities as of the report date. To the extent these securities are actively
traded, valuation adjustments are not applied and they are categorized as Level I.
Convertible securities Convertible securities are valued based on observable trades, when
available. Accordingly, these convertible securities are categorized as Level II. When observable
price quotations are not available, fair value is determined based upon model-based valuation
techniques with observable market inputs, such as specific company stock price and volatility and
unobservable inputs such as credit default rates. These instruments are categorized as Level III.
Corporate fixed income securities Fixed income securities include corporate bonds which are
valued based on pricing services or broker quotes, when available. Accordingly, these corporate
bonds are categorized as Level II. When observable price quotations are not available, fair value
is determined based upon model-based valuation techniques with observable inputs such as specific
security contractual terms and yield curves and unobservable inputs such as credit spreads. These
instruments are categorized as Level III.
Taxable municipal securities Taxable municipal securities are valued using recently executed
observable trades or market price quotations and therefore are generally categorized as Level II.
11
Tax-exempt municipal securities Tax-exempt municipal securities are valued using recently
executed observable trades or market price quotations and therefore are generally categorized as
Level II.
Short-term municipal securities Short-term municipal securities include auction rate securities,
variable rate demand notes, and other short-term municipal securities. Auction rate securities were
historically traded and valued as floating rate notes, priced at par due to the auction mechanism.
Beginning in 2008, the auction rate securities market experienced dislocation due to uncertainties
in the credit markets. During 2009, certain areas of the auction rate market began to function;
however, lower credit issuers remain illiquid. Accordingly, auction rate securities with limited
liquidity are valued based upon the Companys expectations of issuer refunding plans and using
internal models with observable inputs such as specific security contractual terms and yield curves
and unobservable inputs such as yield curves and liquidity discounts and are categorized as Level
III. Variable rate demand notes and other short-term municipal securities are valued using recently
executed observable trades or market price quotations and therefore categorized as Level II.
Asset-backed securities Asset backed securities are valued using observable trades, when
available. Certain asset-backed securities are valued using models where inputs to the model are
directly observable in the market, or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable
market data. These asset-backed securities are categorized as Level II. Other asset-backed
securities, which are principally collateralized by aircraft and have experienced low volumes of
executed transactions, result in less observable transaction data. These assets are valued using
cash flow models that utilize unobservable inputs including airplane lease rates, aircraft
valuation, trust costs, and other factors impacting security cash flows. The Companys aircraft
asset-backed securities had a weighted average yield of 11.8% at March 31, 2010. The Company also
has a minimal amount of asset-backed securities collateralized by residential mortgages. These are
valued using cash flow models that utilize unobservable inputs including credit default rates
ranging from 7-10%, prepayment rates ranging from 6-7% of CPR, severity ranging from 60-75% and
valuation yields ranging from 6.6%-10.5%. These asset-backed securities are categorized as Level
III.
U.S. government agency securities U.S. government agency securities include agency debt bonds and
mortgage bonds. Agency debt bonds are valued by using either direct price quotes or price quotes
for comparable bond securities. Agency debt bonds are categorized as Level II. Mortgage bonds
include mortgage pass-through securities and agency collateralized mortgage-obligations (CMO).
Mortgage pass-through securities and CMO securities are valued using recently executed observable
trades or other observable inputs, such as prepayment speeds and therefore, generally are
categorized as Level II. Mortgage bonds are valued using observable market inputs, such as market
yields ranging from 95145 basis point spreads to treasury securities, or models based upon
prepayment expectations ranging from 161-274 PSA prepayment levels, which are then categorized as
Level II.
U.S. government securities U.S. government securities include highly liquid U.S. treasury
securities which are generally valued using quoted prices and therefore categorized as Level I.
Derivatives Derivative contracts are financial instruments such as forwards, futures, swaps or
option contracts that derive their value from underlying assets, reference rates, indices or a
combination of these factors. A derivative contract generally represents future commitments to
purchase or sell financial instruments at specified terms on a specified date or to exchange
currency or interest payment streams based on the contract or notional amount. Derivative contracts
exclude certain cash instruments, such as mortgage-backed securities, interest-only and
principal-only obligations and indexed debt instruments that derive their values or contractually
required cash flows from the price of some other security or index. The Companys derivatives are
principally interest rate derivatives and valued using market standard pricing models based on the
net present value of estimated future cash flows. The valuation models used require market
observable inputs, including contractual terms, yield curves and measures of volatility. These
measurements are classified as Level II within the fair value hierarchy and are used to value
interest rate swaps, interest rate locks, and forward contracts. In addition, the Company has a
limited number of interest rate derivatives valued using valuation models that utilize market
observable inputs, including contractual terms, yield curves and measures of volatility and
unobservable inputs including credit default rates. These instruments are classified as Level III
within the fair value hierarchy.
Investments
The Companys investments valued at fair value include investments in public companies, warrants of
public or private companies and investments in certain illiquid municipal bonds. Investments in
public companies are valued based on quoted prices on active markets and reported in Level I.
Company owned warrants, which have a cashless exercise option, are valued using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model and reported as Level III assets. Investments in certain illiquid municipal
bonds that the Company is holding for investment are reported as Level III assets.
12
The following table summarizes the valuation of our financial instruments by pricing observability
levels defined in ASC 820 as of March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counterparty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateral |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Level I |
|
Level II |
|
Level III |
|
Netting (1) |
|
Total |
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments and other inventory
positions owned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
2,421 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
2,421 |
|
Convertible securities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
55,746 |
|
|
|
14,685 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
70,431 |
|
Fixed income securities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
136,012 |
|
|
|
2,146 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
138,158 |
|
Municipal securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable securities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
242,128 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
242,128 |
|
Tax-exempt securities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
118,826 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
118,826 |
|
Short-term securities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
58,205 |
|
|
|
17,824 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
76,029 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
16,829 |
|
|
|
27,292 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
44,121 |
|
U.S. government agency securities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
204,039 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
204,039 |
|
U.S. government securities |
|
|
25,121 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
25,121 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
46,928 |
|
|
|
9,046 |
|
|
|
(32,247 |
) |
|
|
23,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial instruments and other inventory
positions owned: |
|
|
27,542 |
|
|
|
878,713 |
|
|
|
70,993 |
|
|
|
(32,247 |
) |
|
|
945,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents |
|
|
9,915 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
9,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
1,065 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,042 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
38,522 |
|
|
$ |
878,713 |
|
|
$ |
74,035 |
|
|
$ |
(32,247 |
) |
|
$ |
959,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments and other inventory
positions sold, but not yet purchased: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
40,140 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
40,140 |
|
Convertible securities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,737 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,737 |
|
Fixed income securities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
106,863 |
|
|
|
5,616 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
112,479 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,920 |
|
|
|
4,379 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6,299 |
|
U.S. government agency securities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
92,281 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
92,281 |
|
U.S. government securities |
|
|
231,755 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
231,755 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
21,917 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(15,213 |
) |
|
|
6,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial instruments and other inventory
positions sold, but not yet purchased: |
|
|
271,895 |
|
|
|
226,718 |
|
|
|
9,995 |
|
|
|
(15,213 |
) |
|
|
493,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
271,895 |
|
|
$ |
226,718 |
|
|
$ |
10,014 |
|
|
$ |
(15,213 |
) |
|
$ |
493,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents cash collateral and the impact of netting on a counterparty basis. The Company
had no securities posted as collateral to its counterparties. |
13
The following table summarizes the valuation of our financial instruments by pricing
observability levels defined in ASC 820 as of December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counterparty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateral |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Level I |
|
|
Level II |
|
|
Level III |
|
|
Netting (1) |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments and other inventory
positions owned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
3,070 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
3,070 |
|
Convertible securities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
75,295 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
75,295 |
|
Fixed income securities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
112,825 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
112,825 |
|
Municipal securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable securities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
151,144 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
151,144 |
|
Tax-exempt securities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
147,809 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
147,809 |
|
Short-term securities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
7,379 |
|
|
|
17,825 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
25,204 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
46,186 |
|
|
|
24,239 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
70,425 |
|
U.S. government agency securities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
125,576 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
125,576 |
|
U.S. government securities |
|
|
70,111 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
70,111 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
54,391 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(35,861 |
) |
|
|
18,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial instruments and other inventory
positions owned: |
|
|
73,181 |
|
|
|
720,605 |
|
|
|
42,064 |
|
|
|
(35,861 |
) |
|
|
799,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents |
|
|
13,352 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
13,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
1,139 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,240 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
87,672 |
|
|
$ |
720,605 |
|
|
$ |
44,304 |
|
|
$ |
(35,861 |
) |
|
$ |
816,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments and other inventory
positions sold, but not yet purchased: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
26,474 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
26,474 |
|
Convertible securities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,678 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,678 |
|
Fixed income securities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
114,568 |
|
|
|
7,771 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
122,339 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6,783 |
|
|
|
2,154 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
8,937 |
|
U.S. government agency securities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
67,001 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
67,001 |
|
U.S. government securities |
|
|
102,911 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
102,911 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
19,294 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(14,839 |
) |
|
|
4,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial instruments and other inventory
positions sold, but not yet purchased: |
|
|
129,385 |
|
|
|
211,324 |
|
|
|
9,925 |
|
|
|
(14,839 |
) |
|
|
335,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
129,385 |
|
|
$ |
211,324 |
|
|
$ |
9,944 |
|
|
$ |
(14,839 |
) |
|
$ |
335,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents cash collateral and the impact of netting on a counterparty basis. The Company
had no securities posted as collateral to its counterparties. |
The Companys Level III assets were $74.0 million and $44.3 million, or 7.7 percent and 5.4
percent of financial instruments measured at fair value at March 31, 2010, and December 31, 2009,
respectively. Transfers between levels are recognized at the beginning of the reporting period.
There were $21.4 million of transfers from Level II to Level III during the quarter ended March 31,
2010 related to convertible securities, asset backed securities and derivatives for which external
prices and valuation inputs became unobservable. Transfers between Level I and Level II were not
material for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
14
The following tables summarize the changes in fair value associated with Level III financial
instruments during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Purchases/ |
|
|
Net transfers |
|
|
Realized gains/ |
|
|
Unrealized gains/ |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
(sales), net |
|
|
in/(out) |
|
|
(losses) (1) |
|
|
(losses) (1) |
|
|
2010 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments and other inventory
positions owned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible securities |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
7,590 |
|
|
$ |
4,292 |
|
|
$ |
1,836 |
|
|
$ |
967 |
|
|
$ |
14,685 |
|
Fixed income securities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,937 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
2,146 |
|
Municipal securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term securities |
|
|
17,825 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
17,824 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
24,239 |
|
|
|
(7,924 |
) |
|
|
8,796 |
|
|
|
1,688 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
27,292 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
8,279 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
9,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial instruments and other inventory
positions owned: |
|
|
42,064 |
|
|
|
1,603 |
|
|
|
21,367 |
|
|
|
3,735 |
|
|
|
2,224 |
|
|
|
70,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
2,240 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
3,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
44,304 |
|
|
$ |
1,603 |
|
|
$ |
21,367 |
|
|
$ |
3,735 |
|
|
$ |
3,026 |
|
|
$ |
74,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments and other inventory
positions sold, but not yet purchased: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income securities |
|
$ |
7,771 |
|
|
$ |
(2,310 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
$ |
5,616 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
2,154 |
|
|
|
1,586 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
4,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial instruments and other inventory
positions sold, but not yet purchased: |
|
|
9,925 |
|
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
9,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
9,944 |
|
|
$ |
(724 |
) |
|
$ |
507 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
223 |
|
|
$ |
10,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Purchases/ |
|
|
Net transfers |
|
|
Realized gains/ |
|
|
Unrealized gains/ |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
(sales), net |
|
|
in/(out) |
|
|
(losses) (1) |
|
|
(losses) (1) |
|
|
2009 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments and other inventory
positions owned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible securities |
|
$ |
3,671 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(3,671 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Fixed income securities |
|
|
2,138 |
|
|
|
1,740 |
|
|
|
4,899 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
9,159 |
|
Municipal securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term securities |
|
|
17,750 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
17,675 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
22,560 |
|
|
|
(1,129 |
) |
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
(316 |
) |
|
|
21,192 |
|
U.S. government agency securities |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial instruments and other inventory
positions owned: |
|
|
46,125 |
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
48,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(348 |
) |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
46,558 |
|
|
$ |
635 |
|
|
$ |
970 |
|
|
$ |
241 |
|
|
$ |
(289 |
) |
|
$ |
48,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
$ |
366 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(347 |
) |
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
366 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(347 |
) |
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Realized and unrealized gains/(losses) related to financial instruments are reported in
institutional brokerage on the consolidated statements of operations. Realized and unrealized
gains/(losses) related to investments are reported in other income/(loss) on the consolidated
statements of operations. |
Some of the Companys financial instruments are not measured at fair value on a recurring
basis, but are recorded at amounts that approximate fair value due to their liquid or short-term
nature. Such financial assets and financial liabilities include cash, securities either purchased
or sold under agreements to resell, receivables and payables either from or to customers and
brokers, dealers and clearing organizations and short-term financings.
15
Note 7 Variable Interest Entities
In the normal course of business, the Company periodically creates or transacts with entities that
may be variable interest entities (VIEs). The Company has investments in and/or acts as the
managing partner or member to approximately 38 partnerships and limited liability companies
(LLCs). These entities were established for the purpose of investing in equity and debt
securities of public and private investments and were initially financed through the capital
commitments of the members. At March 31, 2010, the Companys aggregate net investment in these
partnerships and LLCs totaled $13.7 million. The Companys remaining capital commitment to these
partnerships and LLCs was $3.6 million at March 31, 2010.
Effective January 1, 2010, the Company adopted the guidance amending ASC 810. The Company evaluated
21 of its 38 partnerships and LLCs under the new VIE guidance and the remaining 17 partnerships and
LLCs were evaluated under the historical VIE guidance as these entities met the deferral provisions
defined by ASU 2010-10. The determination as to whether an entity is a VIE is based on the amount
and nature of the members equity investment in the entity. Under the new guidance, the Company
also considers other characteristics such as the power through voting or similar rights to direct
the activities of an entity that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance. Under
the historical guidance, the Company considers characteristics such as the ability to influence the
decision making about the entitys activities and how the entity is financed. The Company has
identified 21 out of the Companys 38 partnerships and LLC entities described above as VIEs. These
VIEs had net assets approximating $991.0 million at March 31, 2010. The Companys exposure to loss
from these entities is $5.6 million, which is the value of its capital contributions recorded in
other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition at March 31, 2010. The Company
had no liabilities related to these entities at March 31, 2010.
The Company is required to consolidate all VIEs for which it is considered to be the primary
beneficiary. Under the new guidance, the determination as to whether the Company is considered to
be the primary beneficiary is based on whether the Company has both the power to direct the
activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance and the
obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be
significant to the VIE. Under the historical guidance, the determination as to whether the Company
is considered to be the primary beneficiary is based on whether the Company will absorb a majority
of the VIEs expected losses, receive a majority of the VIEs expected residual returns, or both.
It was determined the Company is not the primary beneficiary of these 21 VIEs.
The Company has not provided financial or other support to their VIEs that it was not previously
contractually required to provide as of March 31, 2010.
Note 8 Receivables from and Payables to Brokers, Dealers and Clearing Organizations
Amounts receivable from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations at March 31, 2010 and December
31, 2009 included:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Receivable arising from unsettled securities transactions, net |
|
$ |
21,763 |
|
|
$ |
35,324 |
|
Deposits paid for securities borrowed |
|
|
138,503 |
|
|
|
166,399 |
|
Receivable from clearing organizations |
|
|
12,557 |
|
|
|
21,388 |
|
Securities failed to deliver |
|
|
6,448 |
|
|
|
13,102 |
|
Other |
|
|
6,567 |
|
|
|
7,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
185,838 |
|
|
$ |
244,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
Amounts payable to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations at March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009 included:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Deposits received for securities loaned |
|
$ |
22,336 |
|
|
$ |
25,988 |
|
Payable to clearing organizations |
|
|
28,445 |
|
|
|
11,975 |
|
Securities failed to receive |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
22,118 |
|
Other |
|
|
8,670 |
|
|
|
11,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
59,668 |
|
|
$ |
71,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits paid for securities borrowed and deposits received for securities loaned approximate the
market value of the securities. Securities failed to deliver and receive represent the contract
value of securities that have not been delivered or received by the Company on settlement date.
Note 9 Other Assets
Other assets include investments in public companies valued at fair value, investments in private
companies and bridge-loans valued at cost, investments in private equity partnerships that are
valued using the equity method of accounting, net deferred tax assets, income tax receivables and
prepaid expenses.
Other assets at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 included:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments at fair value |
|
$ |
4,107 |
|
|
$ |
3,379 |
|
Investments at cost |
|
|
29,233 |
|
|
|
33,687 |
|
Investments valued using equity method |
|
|
15,178 |
|
|
|
14,825 |
|
Net deferred income tax assets |
|
|
63,925 |
|
|
|
80,058 |
|
Income tax receivables |
|
|
5,680 |
|
|
|
453 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
6,637 |
|
|
|
5,840 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,352 |
|
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
$ |
126,112 |
|
|
$ |
139,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
Note 10 Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The following table presents the changes in the carrying value of goodwill and intangible assets
for the three months ended March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
164,625 |
|
Goodwill recorded in purchase of ARI |
|
|
152,382 |
|
FAMCO earn-out payment |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
317,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
12,067 |
|
Intangible assets acquired in purchase of ARI |
|
|
54,959 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
(976 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
66,050 |
|
|
|
|
The addition of goodwill and intangible assets during the three months ended March 31, 2010,
primarily related to the acquisition of ARI, as discussed in Note 4. Management identified $55.0
million of intangible assets, consisting primarily of the customer relationships ($52.1 million),
which will be amortized over a weighted average life of 9 years, and the ARI trade name ($2.9
million), which has an indefinite life and will not be amortized.
The following table summarizes the aggregate future amortization of the Companys intangible
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
Amortization |
Remainder of 2010 |
|
$ |
6,737 |
|
2011 |
|
|
8,571 |
|
2012 |
|
|
8,038 |
|
2013 |
|
|
7,768 |
|
2014 |
|
|
7,432 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
24,645 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
63,191 |
|
|
|
|
Note 11 Short-Term Financing
The following is a summary of short-term financing and the weighted average interest rates on
borrowings as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance |
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Bank lines (secured) |
|
$ |
54,000 |
|
|
$ |
68,000 |
|
|
|
1.61 |
% |
|
|
1.35 |
% |
Commercial paper (secured) |
|
|
39,520 |
|
|
|
22,079 |
|
|
|
1.24 |
% |
|
|
1.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term financing |
|
$ |
93,520 |
|
|
$ |
90,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
The Company has committed short-term bank line financing available on a secured basis and
uncommitted short-term bank line financing available on both a secured and unsecured basis. The
Company uses these credit facilities in the ordinary course of business to fund a portion of its
daily operations and the amount borrowed under these credit facilities varies daily based on the
Companys funding needs.
The Companys committed short-term bank line financing at March 31, 2010, consisted of a $250
million committed revolving credit facility with U.S. Bank, N.A. Advances under this facility are
secured by certain marketable securities. The unpaid principal amount of all advances under this
facility will be due on September 30, 2010. The Company pays a nonrefundable commitment fee on the
unused portion of the facility on a quarterly basis.
The Companys uncommitted secured lines at March 31, 2010, totaled $275 million with three banks
and are dependent on having appropriate collateral, as determined by the bank agreement, to secure
an advance under the line. The availability of the Companys uncommitted lines are subject to
approval by the individual banks each time an advance is requested and may be denied. In addition,
the Company has established arrangements to obtain financing by another broker dealer at the end of
each business day related specifically to its convertible inventory.
In 2009, the Company initiated a secured commercial paper program to provide another funding source
for its securities inventory. The senior secured commercial paper notes (Series A CP Notes) are
secured by the Companys securities inventory with maturities on the Series A CP Notes ranging from
twenty-seven days to two hundred seventy days from the date of issuance. The Series A CP Notes are
interest-bearing or sold at a discount to par with an interest rate based on the London Interbank
Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus an applicable margin.
As part of these short-term financing arrangements, the Company is subject to various financial and
operational covenants. At March 31, 2010, the Company was in compliance with all covenants related
to its financing facilities.
Note 12 Variable Rate Senior Notes
On December 31, 2009, the Company issued unsecured variable rate senior notes (Notes) in the
amount of $120 million. The initial holders of the Notes are certain entities advised by PIMCO.
Interest is based on an annual rate equal to LIBOR plus 4.10%, adjustable and payable quarterly.
The weighted average interest rate for the three months ended March 31, 2010, was 4.39%. The
proceeds from the Notes were used to fund a portion of the ARI acquisition discussed further in
Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements. The unpaid principal amount of the Notes will be
due on December 31, 2010.
Note 13 Legal Contingencies
The Company has been named as a defendant in various legal actions, including complaints and
litigation and arbitration claims arising from its business activities. Such activities include
claims related to securities brokerage and investment banking activities, and certain class actions
that primarily allege violations of securities laws and seek unspecified damages, which could be
substantial. Also, the Company is involved from time to time in investigations and proceedings by
governmental agencies and self-regulatory organizations. The Company has established reserves for
potential losses that are probable and reasonably estimable that may result from pending and
potential legal actions, investigations and regulatory proceedings.
Given uncertainties regarding the timing, scope, volume and outcome of pending and potential legal
actions, investigations and regulatory proceedings and other factors, the amounts of reserves are
difficult to determine and of necessity subject to future revision. Subject to the foregoing,
management of the Company believes, based on its current knowledge, after consultation with outside
legal counsel and taking into account its established reserves, that pending legal actions,
investigations regulatory and proceedings will be resolved with no material adverse effect on the
consolidated financial condition of the Company. However, if during any period a potential adverse
contingency should become probable or resolved for an amount in excess of the established reserves,
the results of operations in that period could be materially adversely affected.
Note 14 Restructuring
On August 11, 2006, the Company completed the sale of its Private Client Services (PCS) branch
network and certain related assets to UBS Financial Services, Inc., a subsidiary of UBS AG (UBS),
thereby exiting the PCS business. In connection with the sale of the Companys PCS branch network,
the Company initiated a plan to significantly restructure the Companys support infrastructure. All
restructuring costs related to the sale of the PCS branch network were included within discontinued
operations. In 2008, the
19
Company implemented certain expense reduction measures as a means to better align its cost
infrastructure with its revenues. The following table presents a summary of activity with respect
to the restructuring-related liabilities included in other liabilities and accrued expenses on the
consolidated statements of financial condition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
PCS |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Restructuring |
|
Restructuring |
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,892 |
|
|
$ |
7,565 |
|
Provision charged to continuing operations |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Cash outlays |
|
|
(637 |
) |
|
|
(624 |
) |
Non-cash write-downs |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,395 |
|
|
$ |
6,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 15 Shareholders Equity
Share Repurchase Program
In the second quarter of 2008, the Companys board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to
$100 million in common shares through June 30, 2010. During the three months ended March 31, 2010,
the Company did not repurchase any shares of the Companys common stock under this authorization.
The Company has $61.1 million remaining under this authorization.
Issuance of Shares
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company issued 881,846 restricted shares and
11,259 unrestricted shares in conjunction with the acquisition of ARI as described in Note 4. The
restricted shares issued in conjunction with the acquisition of ARI vest ratably over four years in
equal installments beginning on March 1, 2011, and ending on March 1, 2014. These restricted shares
provide for continued vesting after termination, so long as the employee does not violate certain
non-solicitation restrictions.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company issued 81,696 common shares out of
treasury stock in fulfillment of $3.6 million in obligations under the Piper Jaffray Companies
Retirement Plan and issued 319,692 common shares out of treasury stock as a result of vesting and
exercise transactions under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and
Long-Term Incentive Plan.
20
Note 16 Earnings Per Share
The Company calculates earnings per share using the two-class method. Basic earnings per common
share is computed by dividing net income/(loss) applicable to common shareholders by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Net income/(loss) applicable to common
shareholders represents net income/(loss) reduced by the allocation of earnings to participating
securities. All of the Companys outstanding restricted shares are deemed to be participating
securities because they are eligible to share in the profits (e.g. receive dividends) of the
Company. Losses are not allocated to participating securities. Diluted earnings per common share is
calculated by adjusting the weighted average outstanding shares to assume conversion of all
potentially dilutive stock options. The computation of earnings per share is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
$ |
510 |
|
|
$ |
(2,725) |
|
Earnings allocated to participating securities |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) applicable to common shareholders (2) |
|
$ |
409 |
|
|
$ |
(2,725) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares for basic and diluted calculations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares used in basic computation |
|
|
15,837 |
|
|
|
15,868 |
|
Stock options |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Restricted stock |
|
|
- |
|
(3) |
|
2,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares used in diluted computation |
|
|
15,924 |
|
|
|
18,298 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.17) |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.17) |
|
(1) |
|
Earnings per diluted common share is calculated using the basic weighted average number of
common shares outstanding in periods a loss is incurred. |
|
(2) |
|
Net income applicable to common shareholders for diluted and basic EPS may differ under the
two-class method as a result of adding the effect of the assumed exercise of stock options to
dilutive shares outstanding, which alters the ratio used to allocate earnings to common
shareholders and participating securities for purposes of calculating diluted and basic EPS. |
|
(3) |
|
Participating securities were included in the calculation of diluted EPS using the two-class
method, as this computation was more dilutive than the calculation using the treasury-stock
method. |
The anti-dilutive effects from stock options were immaterial for the periods ended March 31,
2010 and 2009.
Note 17 Employee Benefit Plans
Certain employees participated in the Piper Jaffray Companies Non-Qualified Retirement Plan (the
Non-Qualified Plan), an unfunded, non-qualified cash balance pension plan. The Company froze the
plan effective January 1, 2004, thereby eliminating future benefits related to pay increases and
excluding new participants from the plan. Effective December 31, 2009, the Company resolved to
terminate the Non-Qualified Plan through lump sum cash distributions to all participants. These
lump-sum cash payments, totaling $10.4 million, were based on the December 31, 2009 actuarial
valuation of the Non-Qualified Plan and were distributed on March 15, 2010. The Company recognized
settlement expense of $0.2 million in compensation and benefits expense on the consolidated
statement of operations related to the settlement of all Non-Qualified Plan liabilities.
Note 18 Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for equity awards in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification
Topic 718, Compensation Stock Compensation, (ASC 718), which requires all share-based
payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the
statements of operations at grant date fair value over the service period of the award, net of
estimated forfeitures.
21
The Companys primary stock-based compensation plan, Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated
2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan, (the Incentive Plan), permits the grant of equity
awards, including restricted stock and non-qualified stock options, to the Companys employees and
directors for up to 7.0 million shares of common stock. The Company periodically grants shares of
restricted stock to employees and grants shares of Piper Jaffray Companies common stock to its
non-employee directors. The Company also previously granted options to purchase Piper Jaffray
Companies common stock to employees and non-employee directors. The Company believes that such
awards help align the interests of employees and directors with those of shareholders and serve as
an employee retention tool. The awards granted to employees under the Incentive Plan have the
following vesting periods: approximately 79 percent of the awards have three-year cliff vesting
periods, approximately 11 percent of the awards vest ratably from 2011 through 2013 on the annual
grant date anniversary, and approximately 10 percent of the awards cliff vest upon meeting a
specific performance-based metric prior to May 2013. The director awards are fully vested upon
grant. The plan provides for accelerated vesting of option and restricted stock awards if there is
a change in control of the Company (as defined in the plan), in the event of a participants death,
and at the discretion of the compensation committee of the Companys board of directors.
Employee and director stock options were expensed by the Company on a straight-line basis over the
required service period, based on the estimated fair value of the award on the date of grant using
a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The maximum term of the stock options granted to employees
and directors is ten years. The Company has not granted stock options since 2008.
Restricted stock grants are valued at the market price of the Companys common stock on the date of
grant. Restricted stock grants are amortized over the service period. The majority of the Companys
restricted stock grants provide for continued vesting after termination, so long as the employee
does not violate certain post-termination restrictions. These post-termination restrictions do not
meet the criteria for an in-substance service condition as defined by ASC 718. Accordingly, such
restricted stock grants are expensed in the period in which those awards are deemed to be earned,
which is generally the calendar year preceding the February grant date each year.
Performance-based restricted stock awards granted in 2008 and 2009 were valued at the market price
of the Companys common stock on the date of grant. The restricted shares are amortized on a
straight-line basis over the period the Company expects the performance target to be met. The
performance condition must be met for the awards to vest and total compensation cost will be
recognized only if the performance condition is satisfied. The probability that the performance
condition will be achieved and that the awards will vest is reevaluated each reporting period with
changes in actual or estimated outcomes accounted for using a cumulative effect adjustment.
In 2010, the Company established the 2010 Employment Inducement Award Plan (the Inducement Plan)
to provide the Company a competitive advantage in attracting personnel. In conjunction with the
acquisition of ARI, the Company granted $7.0 million (158,801 shares) in restricted shares to ARI
employees. These shares vest ratably over five years in equal installments beginning on March 1,
2011, and ending on March 1, 2015. The Company will record compensation expense for this $7.0
million restricted stock grant on a pro rata basis over the five year vesting period. Unvested
shares granted under the Inducement Plan are cancelled upon the termination of employment by the
award recipient.
The Company recorded compensation expense of $8.6 million and $6.4 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, related to employee restricted stock. The tax benefit
related to the total compensation cost for stock-based compensation arrangements totaled $3.4
million and $2.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
In accordance with ASC 718, if any equity award is forfeited as a result of violating the
post-termination restrictions, the lower of the fair value of the award at grant date or the fair
value of the award at the date of forfeiture is recorded within the consolidated statements of
operations as other income. The Company recorded $1.6 million and $0.3 million of forfeitures
through other income for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
22
The following table summarizes the changes in the Companys non-vested restricted stock for the
three months ended March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Non-Vested |
|
Average |
|
|
Restricted |
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Stock |
|
Fair Value |
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
3,512,749 |
|
|
$ |
40.46 |
|
Granted |
|
|
899,451 |
|
|
|
44.41 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(503,477 |
) |
|
|
70.13 |
|
Canceled |
|
|
(52,091 |
) |
|
|
34.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
3,856,632 |
|
|
$ |
37.59 |
|
As of March 31, 2010, there was $34.0 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
restricted stock expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.93 years.
The following table summarizes the changes in the Companys outstanding stock options for the three
months ended March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Remaining |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Options |
|
Average |
|
Contractual |
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Term (Years) |
|
Value |
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
538,804 |
|
|
$ |
44.50 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
$ |
4,237,480 |
|
Granted |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(2,456 |
) |
|
|
40.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled |
|
|
(15,105 |
) |
|
|
42.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
521,243 |
|
|
$ |
44.60 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
$ |
420,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
404,579 |
|
|
$ |
45.62 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
420,077 |
|
As of March 31, 2010, there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options expected
to be recognized over future years.
Cash received from option exercises for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $0.1 million.
There were no options exercised for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The tax benefit realized
for the tax deduction from option exercises was immaterial for the three months ended March 31,
2010.
Note 19 Geographic Areas
The following table presents net revenues and long-lived assets by geographic region:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Net revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
95,016 |
|
|
$ |
80,673 |
|
Europe |
|
|
7,495 |
|
|
|
2,349 |
|
Asia |
|
|
7,075 |
|
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
109,586 |
|
|
$ |
83,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Long-lived assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
454,657 |
|
|
$ |
260,439 |
|
Europe |
|
|
804 |
|
|
|
965 |
|
Asia |
|
|
11,895 |
|
|
|
11,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
467,356 |
|
|
$ |
273,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Note 20 Net Capital Requirements and Other Regulatory Matters
Piper Jaffray is registered as a securities broker dealer with the SEC and is a member of various
self regulatory organizations (SROs) and securities exchanges. The Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority (FINRA) serves as Piper Jaffrays primary SRO. Piper Jaffray is subject to the uniform
net capital rule of the SEC and the net capital rule of FINRA. Piper Jaffray has elected to use the
alternative method permitted by the SEC rule, which requires that it maintain minimum net capital
of the greater of $1.0 million or 2 percent of aggregate debit balances arising from customer
transactions, as such term is defined in the SEC rule. Under its rules, FINRA may prohibit a member
firm from expanding its business or paying dividends if resulting net capital would be less than 5
percent of aggregate debit balances. Advances to affiliates, repayment of subordinated debt,
dividend payments and other equity withdrawals by Piper Jaffray are subject to certain
notification, approval and other provisions of the SEC and FINRA rules. In addition, Piper Jaffray
is subject to certain approval requirements related to withdrawals of excess net capital.
At March 31, 2010, net capital calculated under the SEC rule was $273.4 million, and exceeded the
minimum net capital required under the SEC rule by $272.4 million.
Piper Jaffray Ltd., which is a registered United Kingdom broker dealer, is subject to the capital
requirements of the U.K. Financial Services Authority (FSA). As of March 31, 2010, Piper Jaffray
Ltd. was in compliance with the capital requirements of the FSA.
Piper Jaffray Asia Holdings Limited operates three entities licensed by the Hong Kong Securities
and Futures Commission, which are subject to the liquid capital requirements of the Securities and
Futures (Financial Resources) Rules promulgated under the Securities and Futures Ordinance. As of
March 31, 2010, Piper Jaffray Asia regulated entities were in compliance with the liquid capital
requirements of the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Ordinance.
Note 21 Income Taxes
The Companys effective income tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was 94.4%,
compared to 176.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The provision for income taxes for
the three months ended March 31, 2010 was unusually high due to a $5.2 million write-off of a
deferred tax asset resulting from a restricted stock grant that vested at a share price lower than
the grant date share price. This item unfavorably impacted the Companys earnings for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 by approximately $0.26 per share. The provision for income taxes for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 was high compared to pre-tax income because the Company did
not record a tax benefit related to its U.K. subsidiary net operating loss carryforward deductions
and incurred approximately $3 million of one-time tax expense items.
24
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
The following information should be read in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited
consolidated financial statements and related notes and exhibits included elsewhere in this report.
Certain statements in this report may be considered forward-looking. Statements that are not
historical or current facts, including statements about beliefs and expectations, are
forward-looking statements. These forward looking statements include, among other things,
statements other than historical information or statements of current condition and may relate to
our future plans and objectives and results, and also may include our belief regarding the effect
of various legal proceedings, as set forth under Legal Proceedings in Part I, Item 3 of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and in our subsequent reports filed
with the SEC. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, and important
factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated, including those
factors discussed below under External Factors Impacting Our Business as well as the factors
identified under Risk Factors in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009, as updated in our subsequent reports filed with the SEC. These reports are
available at our Web site at www.piperjaffray.com and at the SEC Web site at www.sec.gov.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation
to update them in light of new information or future events.
Executive Overview
Our business principally consists of providing investment banking, institutional brokerage, asset
management and related financial services to corporations, private equity groups, public entities,
non-profit entities and institutional investors in the United States, Europe and Asia. We generate
revenues primarily through the receipt of advisory and financing fees earned on investment banking
activities, commissions and sales credits earned on equity and fixed income institutional sales and
trading activities, net interest earned on securities inventories, profits and losses from trading
activities related to these securities inventories and asset management fees.
Our business is a human capital business. Accordingly, compensation and benefits comprise the
largest component of our expenses, and our performance is dependent upon our ability to attract,
develop and retain highly skilled employees who are motivated and committed to providing the
highest quality of service and guidance to our clients.
As part of our growth strategy, we expanded our asset management business through the acquisition
of Advisory Research Holdings, Inc. (ARI), a Chicago-based asset management firm with
approximately $5.9 billion in assets under management. The transaction closed on March 1, 2010. For
more information on our acquisition of ARI, see Note 4 of the accompanying unaudited consolidated
financial statements included in this report.
Results for the three months ended March 31, 2010
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we recorded net income of $0.5 million, or $0.03 per
diluted common share, compared with a net loss of $2.7 million, or $0.17 per diluted common share
for the corresponding period in the prior year. Results for the three months ended March 31, 2010,
included tax expense of $5.2 million (or $0.26 per diluted share) attributable to a write-off of a
deferred tax asset resulting from a restricted stock grant that vested at a share price lower than
the grant date share price. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, non-compensation expenses
were $35.3 million, an increase of $5.3 million compared to the first quarter of 2009, mainly
attributable to increased business activity, higher litigation-related expenses, and $0.6 million
of incremental expenses related to ARI (of which $0.4 million was intangible amortization). Net
revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were $109.6 million, up 30.6 percent from $83.9
million reported in the year-ago period driven by higher equity financing revenues.
External Factors Impacting Our Business
Performance in the financial services industry in which we operate is highly correlated to the
overall strength of economic conditions and financial market activity. Overall market conditions
are a product of many factors, which are beyond our control and mostly unpredictable. These factors
may affect the financial decisions made by investors, including their level of participation in the
financial markets. In turn, these decisions may affect our business results. With respect to
financial market activity, our profitability is sensitive to a variety of factors, including the
demand for investment banking services as reflected by the number and size of equity and debt
financings and merger and acquisition transactions, the volatility of the equity and fixed income
markets, changes in interest rates (especially rapid and extreme changes), the level and shape of
various yield curves, the volume and value of trading in securities, and the demand for asset
management services as reflected by the amount of assets under management.
25
Factors that differentiate our capital markets business within the financial services industry also
may affect our financial results. For example, our business focuses on a middle-market clientele in
specific industry sectors. If the business environment for our focus sectors is impacted
disproportionately as compared to the economy as a whole, or does not recover on pace with other
sectors of the economy, our business and results of operations will be negatively impacted. In
addition, our business could be affected differently than overall market trends. Given the
variability of the capital markets and securities businesses, our earnings may fluctuate
significantly from period to period, and results for any individual period should not be considered
indicative of future results.
As a participant in the financial services industry, we are subject to complex and extensive
regulation of our business. In light of recent conditions in the global financial markets and the
global economy, legislators and regulators have increased their focus on the regulation of the
financial services industry with a view to potential changes, including fundamental changes to the
manner in which the industry is regulated and/or increased regulation in a number of areas. Changes
in the regulatory environment in which we operate could have an adverse effect on our business.
Outlook for the remainder of 2010
Global equity financing conditions were relatively weak in the first quarter of 2010 as declines in
the equity markets in the U.S., Europe and Asia early in the quarter negatively impacted capital
raising for growth companies. Equity financing conditions strengthened near the end of the first
quarter, and we expect to see increasing levels of equity financing activity during 2010. Also, we
expect to see improving trends in middle market advisory activity during 2010, which should result
in improved performance in this business. Our public finance business recorded strong performance
in 2009 as we were able to penetrate new client relationships, expand into new geographies and
increase market share. Performance in our public finance business during the first quarter of 2010
was more muted than a near record fourth quarter 2009 performance; however, we believe full-year
2010 public finance performance will be strong. We expect to significantly advance our asset
management strategy with the acquisition of ARI, which closed on March 1, 2010. The acquisition of
ARI will add scale to our asset management business and provide a platform to support future
organic growth. There can be no assurance regarding our outlook for the remainder of 2010, however.
26
Results of Operations
Financial Summary
The following table provides a summary of the results of our operations and the results of our
operations as a percentage of net revenues for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a Percentage of Net |
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
v2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment banking |
|
$ |
43,748 |
|
|
$ |
24,350 |
|
|
|
79.7 |
|
% |
|
39.9 |
|
% |
|
29.0 |
% |
Institutional brokerage |
|
|
49,095 |
|
|
|
55,027 |
|
|
|
(10.8 |
) |
|
|
44.8 |
|
|
|
65.6 |
|
Interest |
|
|
11,120 |
|
|
|
7,288 |
|
|
|
52.6 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
Asset management |
|
|
9,154 |
|
|
|
3,009 |
|
|
|
204.2 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
Other income/(loss) |
|
|
2,927 |
|
|
|
(3,599 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
(4.3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
116,044 |
|
|
|
86,075 |
|
|
|
34.8 |
|
|
|
105.9 |
|
|
|
102.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
6,458 |
|
|
|
2,193 |
|
|
|
194.5 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
109,586 |
|
|
|
83,882 |
|
|
|
30.6 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
65,096 |
|
|
|
50,324 |
|
|
|
29.4 |
|
|
|
59.4 |
|
|
|
60.0 |
|
Occupancy and equipment |
|
|
7,669 |
|
|
|
6,518 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
Communications |
|
|
6,489 |
|
|
|
6,099 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
Floor brokerage and clearance |
|
|
2,617 |
|
|
|
2,882 |
|
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Marketing and business development |
|
|
5,322 |
|
|
|
4,445 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
Outside services |
|
|
8,004 |
|
|
|
7,519 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
5,234 |
|
|
|
2,551 |
|
|
|
105.2 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expenses |
|
|
100,431 |
|
|
|
80,338 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
91.6 |
|
|
|
95.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
9,155 |
|
|
|
3,544 |
|
|
|
158.3 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
8,645 |
|
|
|
6,269 |
|
|
|
37.9 |
|
% |
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
$ |
510 |
|
|
$ |
(2,725 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
% |
|
(3.2) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M - Not Meaningful
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we recorded net income of $0.5 million. Net
revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were $109.6 million, a 30.6 percent increase
from the year-ago period. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, investment banking revenues
increased 79.7 percent to $43.7 million, compared with revenues of $24.4 million in the prior-year
period. The increase in investment banking revenues was attributable to higher equity and public
finance activity as well as increased advisory services revenues as compared to our extremely weak
performance for these areas in the comparable period of 2009. In the first quarter of 2010,
institutional brokerage revenues decreased 10.8 percent to $49.1 million, compared with $55.0
million in the corresponding period in the prior year, due to lower U.S. equity and convertible
revenues. In the first quarter of 2010, net interest income decreased to $4.7 million, compared
with $5.1 million in the first quarter of 2009. The decrease was primarily the result of interest
expense on the $120 million of variable rate senior notes issued December 31, 2009, to finance a
portion of the ARI acquisition. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, asset management fees
were $9.2 million, compared with $3.0 million in the
27
prior-year period. The increased revenues were primarily driven by the results for ARI, which we
acquired on March 1, 2010. In the first quarter of 2010, other income increased to $2.9 million,
compared with a loss of $3.6 million in the prior-year period, primarily due to gains recorded on
our firm investments and income associated with the forfeitures of stock-based compensation.
Non-interest expenses increased to $100.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010, from
$80.3 million in the corresponding period in the prior year, primarily as a result of increased
compensation and benefits expense.
Consolidated Non-Interest Expenses
Compensation and Benefits - Compensation and benefits expenses, which are the largest component of
our expenses, include salaries, incentive compensation, benefits, stock-based compensation,
employment taxes and other employee costs. A portion of compensation expense is comprised of
variable incentive arrangements, including discretionary incentive compensation, the amount of
which fluctuates in proportion to the level of business activity, increasing with higher revenues
and operating profits. Other compensation costs, primarily base salaries and benefits, are more
fixed in nature. The timing of incentive compensation payments, which generally occur in February,
have a greater impact on our cash position and liquidity, than is reflected in our statements of
operations.
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, compensation and benefits expenses increased 29.4
percent to $65.1 million from $50.3 million in the corresponding period in 2009. This increase was
due to higher variable compensation costs resulting from higher net revenues and profitability.
Compensation and benefits expenses as a percentage of net revenues were 59.4 percent for the first
quarter of 2010, compared with 60.0 percent for the first quarter of 2009.
Occupancy and Equipment In the first quarter of 2010, occupancy and equipment expenses were $7.7
million, compared with $6.5 million for the corresponding period in 2009. The increase was
attributable to a one-time reduction in expense in the first quarter of 2009. We anticipate
increased occupancy costs beginning in the second quarter of 2010 as we begin transitioning to new
space in New York City and Hong Kong.
Communications Communication expenses include costs for telecommunication and data communication,
primarily consisting of expenses for obtaining third-party market data information. For the three
months ended March 31, 2010, communications expenses were $6.5 million, compared with $6.1 million
for the prior-year period.
Floor Brokerage and Clearance For the three months ended March 31, 2010, floor brokerage and
clearance expenses declined $0.3 million to $2.6 million, compared with $2.9 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2009, due to reduced trading volumes.
Marketing and Business Development In the first quarter of 2010, marketing and business
development expenses increased 19.7 percent to $5.3 million, compared with $4.4 million in the
first quarter of 2009. This increase was driven by higher travel costs associated with increased
investment banking activities.
Outside Services Outside services expenses include securities processing expenses, outsourced
technology functions, outside legal fees and other professional fees. Outside services expenses
increased to $8.0 million in the first quarter of 2010, compared with $7.5 million for the
prior-year period, due primarily to increased consulting costs.
Other Operating Expenses Other operating expenses include insurance costs, amortization of
intangible assets, license and registration fees, expenses related to our charitable giving program
and litigation-related expenses, which consist of the amounts we reserve and/or pay out related to
legal and regulatory matters. In the first quarter of 2010, other operating expenses increased to
$5.2 million, compared with $2.6 million in the first quarter of 2009. This increase was primarily
due to increased litigation-related expenses and intangible amortization expense related to ARI.
Income Taxes For the three months ended March 31, 2010, our provision for income taxes was $8.6
million, compared with $6.3 million in the prior-year period. Income tax expense recorded in the
first quarter of 2010 was high compared to pre-tax income because of a $5.2 million write-off of a
deferred tax asset resulting from a restricted stock grant that vested at a share price lower than
the grant date share price. For more information on the write-off of this deferred tax asset, see
Income Taxes within our Critical Accounting Policies. The $6.3 million of income tax expense
recorded in the first quarter of 2009 was high compared to pre-tax income because we did not record
a tax benefit related to certain foreign subsidiary net operating loss carryforward deductions, and
approximately $3 million of one-time items that increased tax expense.
28
Net Revenues from Continuing Operations (Detail)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
v2009 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment banking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equities |
|
$ |
16,988 |
|
|
$ |
4,063 |
|
|
|
318.1 |
% |
Debt |
|
|
15,181 |
|
|
|
12,388 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
Advisory services |
|
|
11,975 |
|
|
|
8,815 |
|
|
|
35.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment banking |
|
|
44,144 |
|
|
|
25,266 |
|
|
|
74.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institutional sales and trading |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equities |
|
|
26,927 |
|
|
|
30,662 |
|
|
|
(12.2) |
|
Fixed income |
|
|
27,376 |
|
|
|
27,805 |
|
|
|
(1.5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total institutional sales and trading |
|
|
54,303 |
|
|
|
58,467 |
|
|
|
(7.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset management |
|
|
9,154 |
|
|
|
3,009 |
|
|
|
204.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income/(loss) |
|
|
1,985 |
|
|
|
(2,860 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues |
|
$ |
109,586 |
|
|
$ |
83,882 |
|
|
|
30.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M - Not meaningful
Investment banking revenues comprise all the revenues generated through financing and advisory
services activities including derivative activities that relate to debt financing. To assess the
profitability of investment banking, we aggregate investment banking fees with the net interest
income or expense associated with these activities.
Investment banking revenues increased 74.7 percent to $44.1 million for the first three months of
2010, compared with $25.3 million for the corresponding period in 2009. For the three months ended
March 31, 2010, equity financing revenues increased to $17.0 million, compared with $4.1 million in
the prior year period due to increased activity. Equity capital markets activity was depressed in
the first quarter of 2009 due to severely negative market conditions. Although the first quarter of
2010 was an improvement from 2009, the global equity markets declined early in the quarter, which
negatively impacted capital raising for growth companies. In the first quarter of 2010, we
completed 18 equity financings, raising $3.6 billion in capital, compared with 4 equity financings
in the first quarter of 2009, raising $0.8 billion in capital. Debt financing revenues in the first
quarter of 2010 increased 22.5 percent to $15.2 million due to higher public finance revenues,
which was attributable to an increase in both the number of transactions completed and average
revenue per transaction. During the first quarter of 2010, we completed 113 public finance issues
with a total par value of $1.7 billion, compared with 96 public finance issues with a total par
value of $1.9 billion during the prior year period. For the three months ended March 31, 2010,
advisory services revenues increased 35.8 percent to $12.0 million due to increased activity. We
completed 12 transactions with an aggregate enterprise value of $1.7 billion during the first
quarter of 2010, compared with 6 transactions with an aggregate enterprise value of $0.7 billion in
the first quarter of 2009.
Institutional brokerage revenues comprise all the revenues generated through trading activities,
which consist primarily of facilitating customer trades. To assess the profitability of
institutional brokerage activities, we aggregate institutional brokerage revenues with the net
interest income or expense associated with financing, economically hedging and holding long or
short inventory positions. Our results may vary from quarter to quarter as a result of changes in
trading margins, trading gains and losses, net interest spreads, trading volumes and the timing of
transactions based on market opportunities.
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, institutional brokerage revenues declined 7.1 percent to
$54.3 million, compared with $58.5 million in the prior-year period, primarily driven by decreased
equity institutional brokerage revenues. Equity institutional brokerage revenues decreased 12.2
percent to $26.9 million in the first quarter of 2010, compared with $30.7 million in the
prior-year period. Revenues associated with the U.S. equities and convertibles business declined
due to lower volumes. Fixed income institutional brokerage revenues were $27.4 million in the first
quarter of 2010, compared with $27.8 million in prior-year period. This
29
decline was attributable to lower revenues from secondary municipal and investment grade
corporate securities offset in part by stronger revenues from municipal strategic trading.
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, asset management fees increased to $9.2 million compared
with $3.0 million in the prior-year period, primarily due to the results of ARI, which we acquired
on March 1, 2010.
Other income/loss includes gains and losses from our investments in private equity and venture
capital funds, other firm investments, and income associated with the forfeiture of stock-based
compensation. In the first quarter of 2010, other income totaled $2.0 million, compared with a loss
of $2.9 million in the prior-year period. In the first quarter of 2010, we recorded income
associated with unrealized gains on firm investments and income from the forfeiture of stock-based
compensation. In the first quarter of 2009, we recorded a loss associated with a decline in the
value of our firm investments.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Recent accounting pronouncements are set forth in Note 3 to our unaudited consolidated financial
statements, and are incorporated herein by reference.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our accounting and reporting policies comply with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)
and conform to practices within the securities industry. The preparation of financial statements in
compliance with GAAP and industry practices requires us to make estimates and assumptions that
could materially affect amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements. Critical
accounting policies are those policies that we believe to be the most important to the portrayal of
our financial condition and results of operations and that require us to make estimates that are
difficult, subjective or complex. Most accounting policies are not considered by us to be critical
accounting policies. Several factors are considered in determining whether or not a policy is
critical, including whether the estimates are significant to the consolidated financial statements
taken as a whole, the nature of the estimates, the ability to readily validate the estimates with
other information (e.g. third-party or independent sources), the sensitivity of the estimates to
changes in economic conditions and whether alternative accounting methods may be used under GAAP.
For a full description of our significant accounting policies, see Note 2 to our consolidated
financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31,
2009. We believe that of our significant accounting policies, the following are our critical
accounting policies.
Valuation of Financial Instruments
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned, financial instruments and other
inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased and certain firm investments on our consolidated
statements of financial condition consist of financial instruments recorded at fair value.
Unrealized gains and losses related to these financial instruments are reflected on our
consolidated statements of operations.
The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged
in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. When
available, we use observable market prices, observable market parameters, or broker or dealer
prices (bid and ask prices) to derive the fair value of the instrument. In the case of financial
instruments transacted on recognized exchanges, the observable market prices represent quotations
for completed transactions from the exchange on which the financial instrument is principally
traded. Bid prices represent the highest price a buyer is willing to pay for a financial instrument
at a particular time. Ask prices represent the lowest price a seller is willing to accept for a
financial instrument at a particular time.
A substantial percentage of the fair value of our financial instruments and other inventory
positions owned, and financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet
purchased, are based on observable market prices, observable market parameters, or derived from
broker or dealer prices. The availability of observable market prices and pricing parameters can
vary from product to product. Where available, observable market prices and pricing or market
parameters in a product may be used to derive a price without requiring significant judgment. In
certain markets, observable market prices or market parameters are not available for all products,
and fair value is determined using techniques appropriate for each particular product. These
techniques may involve some degree of judgment. Results from valuation models and other valuation
techniques in one period may not be indicative of the future period fair value measurement.
30
For investments in illiquid or privately held securities that do not have readily determinable fair
values, the determination of fair value requires us to estimate the value of the securities using
the best information available. Among the factors considered by us in determining the fair value of
such financial instruments are the cost, terms and liquidity of the investment, the financial
condition and operating results of the issuer, the quoted market price of publicly traded
securities with similar quality and yield, and other factors generally pertinent to the valuation
of investments. In instances where a security is subject to transfer restrictions, the value of the
security is based primarily on the quoted price of a similar security without restriction but may
be reduced by an amount estimated to reflect such restrictions. Even where the value of a security
is derived from an independent source, certain assumptions may be required to determine the
securitys fair value. For example, we assume that the size of positions that we hold would not be
large enough to affect the quoted price of the securities if we sell them, and that any such sale
would happen in an orderly manner. The actual value realized upon disposition could be different
from the current estimated fair value.
Derivatives are valued using market standard pricing models based on the net present value of
estimated future cash flows. Management deemed the net present value of estimated future cash flows
model to be the best estimate of fair value as most of our derivative products are interest rate
products. The valuation models used require inputs including contractual terms, market prices,
yield curves, credit curves and measures of volatility. The valuation models are monitored over the
life of the derivative product. If there are any changes in the underlying inputs, the model is
updated for those new inputs.
FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,
establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to
measure fair value. The objective of a fair value measurement is to determine the price that would
be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants at the measurement date (the exit price). The hierarchy gives the highest
priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level I
measurements) and the lowest priority to inputs with little or no pricing observability (Level III
measurements). Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of
input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Instruments that trade infrequently and therefore have little or no price transparency are
classified within Level III based on the results of our price verification process. The Companys
Level III assets were $74.0 million and $44.3 million as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively, and represented approximately 7.7 percent and 5.4 percent of financial instruments
measured at fair value. At March 31, 2010, this balance primarily consisted of asset-backed
securities, principally collateralized by aircraft and residential mortgages, that have experienced
low volumes of executed transactions, such that unobservable inputs had to be utilized for the fair
value measurements and auction-rate securities related to lower credit issuers for which the market
has remained illiquid. Asset-backed securities collateralized with airplane leases are valued using
cash flow models that utilize unobservable inputs including airplane lease rates, trust costs,
aircraft valuation and other factors impacting security cash flows. Asset-backed securities
collateralized with residential mortgages are valued using cash flow models that utilize
unobservable inputs that include credit default rates, prepayment rates and severity rates.
Auction-rate securities are valued based upon our expectations of issuer refunding plans and using
internal models. We could experience reductions in the value of these inventory positions, which
would have a negative impact on our business and results of operations.
During the quarter-ended March 31, 2010, we recorded net purchases of $1.6 million of Level III
assets, primarily consisting of $7.6 million of net purchases of convertible securities and $1.9
million net purchases of corporate bonds offset with $7.9 million in net sales of asset-backed
securities. We had net transfers of $21.4 million of assets from Level II to Level III during the
first quarter of 2010. Transfers of assets from Level II to Level III were primarily related to
convertible securities, asset-backed securities and derivatives as external prices became
unobservable. During the first quarter of 2010, net gains (realized and unrealized) on Level III
assets of $6.7 million were attributed to increased fair values of certain asset-backed securities,
certain convertible securities and certain principal investments as well as gains on the sale of
certain convertible securities and certain asset-backed securities.
During the quarter-ended March 31, 2010, we recorded net sales of $0.7 million of Level III
liabilities related to fixed income and asset-backed securities made to facilitate customer
activity. We had $0.5 million of liabilities transfer from Level II to Level III, related to
asset-backed securities. Our valuation adjustments (realized and unrealized) increased Level III
liabilities by $0.3 million.
Financial instruments carried at contract amounts have short-term maturities (one year or less),
are repriced frequently or bear market interest rates and, accordingly, the carrying amount of
those contracts approximate fair value. Financial instruments carried at contract amounts on our
consolidated statements of financial condition include receivables from and payables to brokers,
dealers and clearing organizations, securities purchased under agreements to resell, securities
sold under agreements to repurchase, receivables from and payables to customers and short-term
financing.
31
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
We record all assets and liabilities acquired in purchase acquisitions, including goodwill and
other intangible assets, at fair value. Determining the fair value of assets and liabilities
acquired requires certain management estimates. At March 31, 2010, we had goodwill of $317.0
million. Of this goodwill balance, $152.4 million was recorded in 2010 as a result of the
acquisition of Advisory Research Holdings, Inc. and $105.5 million is a result of the 1998
acquisition by U.S. Bancorp of our predecessor, Piper Jaffray Companies Inc., and its subsidiaries.
Under FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 350, Intangibles Goodwill and Other, we are
required to perform impairment tests of our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets
annually and on an interim basis when certain events or circumstances exist that could indicate
possible impairment. We have elected to test for goodwill impairment in the fourth quarter of each
calendar year. The goodwill impairment test is a two-step process, which requires management to
make judgments in determining what assumptions to use in the calculation. The first step of the
process consists of estimating the fair value of our two principal reporting units (capital markets
and asset management) based on the following factors: our market capitalization, a discounted cash
flow model using revenue and profit forecasts, public market comparables and multiples of recent
mergers and acquisitions of similar businesses. Valuation multiples may be based on revenues,
price-to-earnings and tangible capital ratios of comparable public companies and business segments.
These multiples may be adjusted to consider competitive differences including size, operating
leverage and other factors. The estimated fair values of our reporting units are compared with
their carrying values, which includes the allocated goodwill. If the estimated fair values are less
than the carrying values, a second step is performed to compute the amount of the impairment by
determining an implied fair value of goodwill. The determination of a reporting units implied
fair value of goodwill requires us to allocate the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to
the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit. Any unallocated fair value represents the
implied fair value of goodwill, which is compared to its corresponding carrying value.
As noted above, the initial recognition of goodwill and other intangible assets and the subsequent
impairment analysis requires management to make subjective judgments concerning estimates of how
the acquired assets or businesses will perform in the future using valuation methods including
discounted cash flow analysis. Our estimated cash flows typically extend for five years and, by
their nature, are difficult to determine over an extended time period. Events and factors that may
significantly affect the estimates include, among others, competitive forces and changes in revenue
growth trends, cost structures, technology, discount rates and market conditions. To assess the
reasonableness of cash flow estimates and validate assumptions used in our estimates, we review
historical performance of the underlying assets or similar assets. In assessing the fair value of
our reporting units, the volatile nature of the securities markets and our industry requires us to
consider the business and market cycle and assess the stage of the cycle in estimating the timing
and extent of future cash flows.
We completed our annual goodwill impairment testing as of November 30, 2009, and no impairment was
identified. In addition, we tested the definite-lived intangible assets acquired as part of the
FAMCO acquisition and concluded there was no impairment.
Stock-Based Compensation
As part of our compensation to employees and directors, we use stock-based compensation, consisting
of restricted stock and stock options. The Company accounts for equity awards in accordance with
FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation Stock Compensation, (ASC 718),
which requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options,
to be recognized in the statements of operations at grant date fair value over the service period
of the award, net of estimated forfeitures.
Compensation paid to employees in the form of restricted stock or stock options is generally
accrued or amortized on a straight-line basis over the required service period of the award and is
included in our results of operations as compensation expense. The majority of these awards have a
three-year cliff vesting schedule. The majority of our restricted stock and option grants provide
for continued vesting after termination, so long as the employee does not violate certain
post-termination restrictions as set forth in the award agreements or any agreements entered into
upon termination. These post-termination restrictions do not meet the criteria for an in-substance
service condition as defined by ASC 718. Accordingly, such restricted stock and option grants are
expensed in the period in which those awards are deemed to be earned, which is generally the
calendar year preceding our annual February equity grant. If any of these awards are cancelled, the
lower of the fair value at grant date or the fair value at the date of cancellation is recorded
within other income in the consolidated statements of operations.
Performance-based restricted stock awards granted are amortized on a straight-line basis over the
period we expect the performance target to be met. The performance condition must be met for the
awards to vest and total compensation cost will be recognized only if the performance condition is
satisfied. The probability that the performance conditions will be achieved and that the awards
will vest
32
is reevaluated each reporting period with changes in actual or estimated compensation expense
accounted for using a cumulative effect adjustment.
Stock-based compensation granted to our non-employee directors is in the form of unrestricted
common shares of Piper Jaffray Companies stock. Stock-based compensation paid to directors is
immediately expensed and is included in our results of operations as outside services expense as of
the date of grant.
We granted stock options in fiscal years 2004 through 2008. In determining the estimated fair value
of stock options, we used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This model requires management to
exercise judgment with respect to certain assumptions, including the expected dividend yield, the
expected volatility, and the expected life of the options.
Contingencies
We are involved in various pending and potential legal proceedings related to our business,
including litigation, arbitration and regulatory proceedings. Some of these matters involve claims
for substantial amounts, including claims for punitive and other special damages. We have, after
consultation with outside legal counsel and consideration of facts currently known by management,
recorded estimated losses in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 450,
Contingencies, to the extent that claims are probable of loss and the amount of the loss can be
reasonably estimated. The determination of these reserve amounts requires significant judgment on
the part of management. In making these determinations, we consider many factors, including, but
not limited to, the loss and damages sought by the plaintiff or claimant, the basis and validity of
the claim, the likelihood of a successful defense against the claim, and the potential for, and
magnitude of, damages or settlements from such pending and potential litigation and arbitration
proceedings, and fines and penalties or orders from regulatory agencies.
Given the uncertainties regarding timing, size, volume and outcome of pending and potential legal
proceedings and other factors, the amounts of reserves are difficult to determine and of necessity
subject to future revision. Subject to the foregoing, we believe, based on our current knowledge,
after appropriate consultation with outside legal counsel and after taking into account our
established reserves, that pending litigation, arbitration and regulatory proceedings will be
resolved with no material adverse effect on our financial condition. However, if, during any
period, a potential adverse contingency should become probable or resolved for an amount in excess
of the established reserves, the results of operations in that period could be materially adversely
affected.
Income Taxes
We file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return, which includes all of our qualifying
subsidiaries. We also are subject to income tax in various states and municipalities and those
foreign jurisdictions in which we operate. Amounts provided for income taxes are based on income
reported for financial statement purposes and do not necessarily represent amounts currently
payable. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases and for tax loss carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years
in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on
deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period
that includes the enactment date. Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences in
reporting certain items, principally, amortization of share-based compensation. The realization of
deferred tax assets is assessed and a valuation allowance is recorded to the extent that it is more
likely than not that any portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. We believe that
our future taxable profits will be sufficient to recognize our U.S. deferred tax assets. If
however, our projections of future taxable profits do not materialize, we may conclude that a
valuation allowance is needed. We have recorded a deferred tax asset valuation allowance of $4.7
million related to foreign subsidiary net operating loss carry forwards.
We record deferred tax benefits for future tax deductions expected upon the vesting of share-based
compensation. If deductions reported on our tax return for share-based compensation (i.e., the
value of the share-based compensation at the time of vesting) exceed the cumulative cost of those
instruments recognized for financial reporting (i.e., the grant date fair value of the compensation
computed in accordance with ASC 718), we record the excess tax benefit as additional paid-in
capital. Conversely, if deductions reported on our tax return for share-based compensation are less
than the cumulative cost of those instruments recognized for financial reporting, we offset the
deficiency first to any previously recognized excess tax benefits recorded as additional paid-in
capital and any remaining deficiency is recorded as income tax expense. As of March 31, 2010, we do
not have any available excess tax benefits within additional paid-in capital. Approximately 500,000
shares of restricted stock vested in the first quarter of 2010 at values less than the grant date
fair value resulting in $5.2 million of income tax expense in the first quarter of 2010.
33
We establish reserves for uncertain income tax positions in accordance with FASB Accounting
Standards Codification Topic 740, Income Taxes when, it is not more likely than not that a
certain position or component of a position will be ultimately upheld by the relevant taxing
authorities. Significant judgment is required in evaluating uncertain tax positions. Our tax
provision and related accruals include the impact of estimates for uncertain tax positions and
changes to the reserves that are considered appropriate. To the extent the probable tax outcome of
these matters changes, such change in estimate will impact the income tax provision in the period
of change.
Liquidity, Funding and Capital Resources
Liquidity is of critical importance to us given the nature of our business. Insufficient liquidity
resulting from adverse circumstances contributes to, and may be the cause of, financial institution
failure. Accordingly, we regularly monitor our liquidity position, including our cash and net
capital positions, and we have implemented a liquidity strategy designed to enable our business to
continue to operate even under adverse circumstances, although there can be no assurance that our
strategy will be successful under all circumstances.
The majority of our tangible assets consist of assets readily convertible into cash. Financial
instruments and other inventory positions owned are stated at fair value and are generally readily
marketable in most market conditions. Receivables and payables with customers and brokers and
dealers usually settle within a few days. As part of our liquidity strategy, we emphasize
diversification of funding sources to the extent possible and maximize our lower-cost financing
alternatives. Our assets are financed by our cash flows from operations, equity capital, and other
short-term funding arrangements. The fluctuations in cash flows from financing activities are
directly related to daily operating activities from our various businesses.
Certain market conditions can impact the liquidity of our inventory positions, requiring us to hold
larger inventory positions for longer than expected or requiring us to take other actions that may
adversely impact our results.
A significant component of our employees compensation is paid in annual discretionary incentive
compensation. The timing of these incentive compensation payments, which generally are made in
February, has a significant impact on our cash position and liquidity when paid.
We currently do not pay cash dividends on our common stock and do not plan to in the foreseeable
future.
On April 16, 2008, we announced that our board of directors had authorized the repurchase of up to
$100 million in shares of our common stock, which expires on June 30, 2010. In the first quarter of
2010, we did not repurchase any shares of our common stock under this authorization. Based upon
prior repurchases, $61.1 million of this authorization remains as of March 31, 2010.
We currently do not have a credit rating, which may adversely affect our liquidity and increase our
borrowing costs by limiting access to sources of liquidity that require a credit rating as a
condition to providing funds.
Funding Sources
Short-term financing
Short-term financing is obtained primarily through the use of repurchase agreements, securities
lending arrangements, commercial paper issuance and bank lines of credit and is typically
collateralized by the firms securities inventory. In addition, we have established arrangements to
obtain financing by another broker dealer at the end of each business day related specifically to
our convertible inventory. Short-term financing is generally obtained at rates based upon the
federal funds rate and/or the London Interbank Offer Rate. We have available both committed and
uncommitted short-term financing with a diverse group of banks.
Uncommitted Lines - We use uncommitted lines in the ordinary course of business to fund a
portion of our daily operations, and the amount borrowed under our uncommitted lines varies daily
based on our funding needs. Our uncommitted secured lines total $275 million with three banks and
are dependent on having appropriate collateral, as determined by the bank agreement, to secure an
advance under the line. Collateral limitations could reduce the amount of funding available under
these secured lines. We also have a $100 million uncommitted unsecured facility with one of these
banks. These uncommitted lines are discretionary and are not a commitment by the bank to provide an
advance under the line. These lines are subject to approval by the respective bank each time an
advance is requested and advances may be denied. We manage our relationships with the banks that
provide these uncommitted
34
facilities in order to have appropriate levels of funding for our business. At March 31, 2010, we
had $54 million outstanding against these lines of credit.
Committed Lines - Our committed line is a $250 million revolving secured credit facility.
We use this credit facility in the ordinary course of business to fund a portion of our daily
operations, and the amount borrowed under the facility varies daily based on our funding needs.
Advances under this facility are secured by certain marketable securities. The facility includes a
covenant that requires our U.S. broker dealer subsidiary to maintain a minimum net capital of $150
million, and the unpaid principal amount of all advances under the facility will be due on
September 30, 2010. At March 31, 2010, we had no advances against our committed line of credit.
Commercial Paper Program - In 2009, we initiated a secured commercial paper program to fund
a portion of our securities inventories. The maximum amount that may be issued under the program
is $300 million, of which $39.5 million is outstanding at March 31, 2010. The commercial paper
notes are secured by our securities inventory with maturities on the commercial paper ranging from
27 days to 270 days from date of issuance.
Average net repurchase agreements (excluding repurchase agreements used to facilitate economic
hedges) of $92 million and $33 million and short-term bank loans of $74 million and $14 million in
the first quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively, were primarily used to finance inventory as well
as customer and trade-related receivables. We also used an average of $28 million in securities
lending arrangements and an average of $31 million in commercial paper in the first quarter of 2010
to finance inventory and receivables. Growth in our securities inventories is generally financed
through a combination of these various short-term financing arrangements.
Variable rate senior notes
On December 31, 2009, we issued variable rate senior notes (Notes) in the amount of $120 million.
The initial holders of the Notes are certain entities advised by Pacific Investment Management
Company LLC (PIMCO). The proceeds from the Notes were used to fund a portion of the ARI
acquisition, discussed above under Executive Overview. The unpaid principal amount of the Notes
will be due on December 31, 2010.
Contractual Obligations
Our contractual obligations have not materially changed from those reported in our Annual Report to
Shareholders on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Capital Requirements
As a registered broker dealer and member firm of FINRA, our U.S. broker dealer subsidiary is
subject to the uniform net capital rule of the SEC and the net capital rule of FINRA. We have
elected to use the alternative method permitted by the uniform net capital rule, which requires
that we maintain minimum net capital of the greater of $1.0 million or 2 percent of aggregate debit
balances arising from customer transactions, as this is defined in the rule. FINRA may prohibit a
member firm from expanding its business or paying dividends if resulting net capital would be less
than 5 percent of aggregate debit balances. Advances to affiliates, repayment of subordinated
liabilities, dividend payments and other equity withdrawals are subject to certain notification and
other provisions of the uniform net capital rule and the net capital rule of FINRA. We expect that
these provisions will not impact our ability to meet current and future obligations. We also are
subject to certain notification requirements related to withdrawals of excess net capital from our
broker dealer subsidiary. At March 31, 2010, our net capital under the SECs Uniform Net Capital
Rule was $273.4 million, and exceeded the minimum net capital required under the SEC rule by $272.4
million.
Although we operate with a level of net capital substantially greater than the minimum thresholds
established by FINRA and the SEC, a substantial reduction of our capital would curtail many of our
revenue producing activities.
Piper Jaffray Ltd., our broker dealer subsidiary registered in the United Kingdom, is subject to
the capital requirements of the U.K. Financial Services Authority. Each of our Piper Jaffray Asia
entities licensed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission is subject to the liquid
capital requirements of the Securities and Futures (Financial Resources) Rule promulgated under the
Securities and Futures Ordinance.
35
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the ordinary course of business we enter into various types of off-balance sheet arrangements.
The following table summarizes our off-balance-sheet arrangements at March 31, 2010 and December
31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
Expiration Per Period at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013- |
|
2015- |
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2014 |
|
2016 |
|
Later |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Customer matched-book derivative contracts (1)(2) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
155,090 |
|
|
$ |
150,463 |
|
|
$ |
6,370,552 |
|
|
$ |
6,676,105 |
|
|
$ |
6,795,186 |
|
Trading securities derivative contracts (2) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
217,000 |
|
|
|
229,500 |
|
|
|
234,500 |
|
Loan commitments |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
Private equity and other principal investments |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,588 |
|
|
|
3,652 |
|
(1) |
|
Consists of interest rate swaps. We have minimal market risk
related to these matched-book derivative contracts; however, we do
have counterparty risk with two major financial institutions,
which are mitigated by collateral deposits. In addition, we have a
limited number of counterparties (contractual amount of $270.5
million at March 31, 2010) who are not required to post
collateral. Based on market movements, the uncollateralized
amounts representing the fair value of the derivative contract can
become material, exposing us to the credit risk of these
counterparties. At March 31, 2010, we had $16.3 million of credit
exposure with these counterparties, including $9.0 million of
credit exposure with one counterparty. |
|
(2) |
|
We believe the fair value of these derivative contracts is a more
relevant measure of the obligations because we believe the
notional or contract amount overstates the expected payout. At
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the net fair value of these
derivative contracts approximated $17.0 million and $14.1 million,
respectively. |
Derivatives
Derivatives notional contract amounts are not reflected as assets or liabilities on our
consolidated statements of financial condition. Rather, the market value, or fair value, of the
derivative transactions are reported on the consolidated statements of financial condition as
assets or liabilities in financial instruments and other inventory positions owned and financial
instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased, as applicable. Derivatives
are presented on a net basis by counterparty when a legal right of offset exists and on a net basis
by cross product when applicable provisions are stated in a master netting agreement.
We enter into derivative contracts in a principal capacity as a dealer to satisfy the financial
needs of clients. We also use derivative products to hedge the interest rate and market value risks
associated with our security positions. Our interest rate hedging strategies may not work in all
market environments and as a result may not be effective in mitigating interest rate risk. For a
complete discussion of our activities related to derivative products, see Note 5, Financial
Instruments and Other Inventory Positions Owned and Financial Instruments and Other Inventory
Positions Sold, but Not Yet Purchased, in the notes to our unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
Loan Commitments
We may commit to short-term bridge-loan financing for our clients or make commitments to underwrite
corporate debt. We had $5.0 million in loan commitments outstanding at March 31, 2010.
Private Equity and Other Principal Investments
We have committed capital to certain non-consolidated private-equity funds. These commitments have
no specified call dates. We had $3.6 million of fund commitments outstanding at March 31, 2010.
Special Purpose Entities
As of March 31, 2010, we have investments in various entities, typically partnerships or limited
liability companies, established for the purpose of investing in equity and debt securities of
public and private investments. We commit capital or act as the managing partner or member of these
entities. Some of these entities are deemed to be VIEs. For a complete discussion of our activities
related to these types of entities, see Note 7, Variable Interest Entities, to our unaudited
consolidated financial statements.
36
Other Off-Balance Sheet Exposure
Our other types of off-balance-sheet arrangements include contractual commitments. For a discussion
of our activities related to these off-balance sheet arrangements, see Note 17, Contingencies and
Commitments, to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report to
Shareholders on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Enterprise Risk Management
Risk is an inherent part of our business. In the course of conducting business operations, we are
exposed to a variety of risks. Market risk, liquidity risk, credit risk, operational risk, legal,
regulatory and compliance risk, and reputational risk are the principal risks we face in operating
our business. We seek to identify, assess and monitor each risk in accordance with defined policies
and procedures. The extent to which we properly identify and effectively manage each of these risks
is critical to our financial condition and profitability.
With respect to market risk and credit risk, our risk management process is focused on daily
communication among traders, trading department management and senior management concerning our
inventory positions and overall risk profile. Our risk management functions supplement this
communication process by providing their independent perspectives on our market and credit risk
profile on a daily basis. The broader goals of our risk management functions are to understand the
risk profile of each trading area, to consolidate risk monitoring company-wide, to assist in
implementing effective hedging strategies, to articulate large trading or position risks to senior
management, and to ensure accurate mark-to-market pricing.
In addition to supporting daily risk management processes on the trading desks, our risk management
functions support our market and credit risk committee. This committee oversees risk management
practices, including defining acceptable risk tolerances and approving risk management policies.
Market Risk
Market risk represents the risk of financial volatility that may result from the change in value of
a financial instrument due to fluctuations in its market price. Our exposure to market risk is
directly related to our role as a financial intermediary for our clients, to our market-making
activities and our proprietary activities. Market risks are inherent to both cash and derivative
financial instruments. The scope of our market risk management policies and procedures includes all
market-sensitive financial instruments.
Our different types of market risk include:
Interest Rate Risk Interest rate risk represents the potential volatility from changes in market
interest rates. We are exposed to interest rate risk arising from changes in the level and
volatility of interest rates, changes in the shape of the yield curve, changes in credit spreads,
and the rate of prepayments. Interest rate risk is managed through the use of appropriate hedging
in U.S. government securities, agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, corporate debt
securities, interest rate swaps, options, futures and forward contracts. We utilize interest rate
swap contracts to hedge a portion of our fixed income inventory and to hedge rate lock agreements
and forward bond purchase agreements we may enter into with our public finance customers.
Additionally, we historically used interest rate swap agreements to hedge residual cash flows from
our tender option bond program. Our interest rate hedging strategies may not work in all market
environments and as a result may not be effective in mitigating interest rate risk. These interest
rate swap contracts are recorded at fair value with the changes in fair value recognized in
earnings.
Equity Price Risk Equity price risk represents the potential loss in value due to adverse changes
in the level or volatility of equity prices. We are exposed to equity price risk through our
trading activities in the U.S. and European markets on both listed and over-the-counter equity
markets. We attempt to reduce the risk of loss inherent in our market-making and in our inventory
of equity securities by establishing limits on the notional level of our inventory and by managing
net position levels with those limits.
Currency Risk Currency risk arises from the possibility that fluctuations in foreign exchange
rates will impact the value of financial instruments. A portion of our business is conducted in
currencies other than the U.S. dollar, and changes in foreign exchange rates relative to the U.S.
dollar can therefore affect the value of non-U.S. dollar net assets, revenues and expenses. A
change in the foreign currency rates could create either a foreign currency transaction gain/loss
(recorded in our consolidated statements of operations) or a foreign currency translation
adjustment to the stockholders equity section of our consolidated statements of financial
condition.
37
Value-at-Risk
Value-at-Risk (VaR) is the potential loss in value of our trading positions due to adverse market
movements over a defined time horizon with a specified confidence level. We perform a daily VaR
analysis on substantially all of our trading positions, including fixed income, equities,
convertible bonds, exchange traded options, and all associated economic hedges. These positions
encompass both customer-related activities and proprietary investments. We use a VaR model because
it provides a common metric for assessing
market risk across business lines and products. Changes in VaR between reporting periods are
generally due to changes in levels of risk exposure, volatilities and/or correlations among asset
classes and individual securities.
We use a Monte Carlo simulation methodology for VaR calculations. We believe this methodology
provides VaR results that properly reflect the risk profile of all our instruments, including those
that contain optionality and accurately models correlation movements among all of our asset
classes. In addition, it provides improved tail results as there are no assumptions of
distribution, and can add additional insight for scenario shock analysis.
Model-based VaR derived from simulation has inherent limitations including: reliance on historical
data to predict future market risk; VaR calculated using a one-day time horizon does not fully
capture the market risk of positions that cannot be liquidated or offset with hedges within one
day; and published VaR results reflect past trading positions while future risk depends on future
positions.
The modeling of the market risk characteristics of our trading positions involves a number of
assumptions and approximations. While we believe that these assumptions and approximations are
reasonable, different assumptions and approximations could produce materially different VaR
estimates.
The following table quantifies the model-based VaR simulated for each component of market risk for
the periods presented computed using the past 250 days of historical data. When calculating VaR we
use a 95 percent confidence level and a one-day time horizon. This means that, over time, there is
a 1 in 20 chance that daily trading net revenues will fall below the expected daily trading net
revenues by an amount at least as large as the reported VaR. Shortfalls on a single day can exceed
reported VaR by significant amounts. Shortfalls can also accumulate over a longer time horizon,
such as a number of consecutive trading days. Therefore, there can be no assurance that actual
losses occurring on any given day arising from changes in market conditions will not exceed the VaR
amounts shown below or that such losses will not occur more than once in a 20-day trading period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Interest Rate Risk |
|
$ |
2,233 |
|
|
$ |
1,147 |
|
Equity Price Risk |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
Diversification Effect (1) |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Value-at-Risk |
|
$ |
2,170 |
|
|
$ |
1,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Equals the difference between total VaR and the sum of the VaRs for the two risk
categories. This effect arises because the two market risk categories are not perfectly
correlated. |
We view average VaR over a period of time as more representative of trends in the business
than VaR at any single point in time. The table below illustrates the daily high, low and average
value-at-risk calculated for each component of market risk during the three months ended March 31,
2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Average |
Interest Rate Risk |
|
$ |
4,359 |
|
|
$ |
1,689 |
|
|
$ |
2,407 |
|
Equity Price Risk |
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
Diversification Effect (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(276 |
) |
Total Value-at-Risk |
|
$ |
4,227 |
|
|
$ |
1,591 |
|
|
$ |
2,301 |
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Average |
Interest Rate Risk |
|
$ |
2,947 |
|
|
$ |
531 |
|
|
$ |
1,397 |
|
Equity Price Risk |
|
|
951 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
Diversification Effect (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(252 |
) |
Total Value-at-Risk |
|
$ |
2,937 |
|
|
$ |
513 |
|
|
$ |
1,366 |
|
(1) |
|
Equals the difference between total VaR and the sum of the VaRs for the two risk
categories. This effect arises because the two market risk categories are not perfectly
correlated. Because high and low VaR numbers for these risk categories may have occurred on
different days, high and low numbers for diversification benefit would not be meaningful. |
Trading losses incurred on a single day did not exceed our one-day VaR on any occasions during
the first quarter of 2010.
The aggregate VaR as of March 31, 2010 was higher compared to levels reported as of December 31,
2009. This is due mainly to overall higher balances in our inventories.
In addition to VaR, we also employ additional measures to monitor and manage market risk exposure,
including the following: net market position, duration exposure, option sensitivities, and
inventory turnover. All metrics are aggregated by asset concentration and are used for monitoring
limits and exception approvals.
Liquidity Risk
Market risk can be exacerbated in times of trading illiquidity when market participants refrain
from transacting in normal quantities and/or at normal bid-offer spreads. Depending on the specific
security, the structure of the financial product, and/or overall market conditions, we may be
forced to hold onto a security for substantially longer than we had planned. Our inventory
positions subject us to potential financial losses from the reduction in value of illiquid
positions.
We are also exposed to liquidity risk in our day-to-day funding activities. We have a relatively
low leverage ratio of 2.61 as of March 31, 2010. We calculate our leverage ratio by dividing total
assets by total shareholders equity. Our U.S. broker dealer had net capital of $273.4 million as
of March 31, 2010. We manage liquidity risk by diversifying our funding sources across products and
among individual counterparties within those products. For example, our treasury department
actively manages the use of repurchase agreements, securities lending arrangements, commercial
paper issuance and secured and unsecured bank borrowings each day depending on pricing,
availability of funding, available collateral and lending parameters from any one of these sources.
We also added a committed bank line to our funding sources during 2008 to further manage liquidity
risk, which we renewed in September 2009.
In addition to managing our capital and funding, the treasury department oversees the management of
net interest income risk and the overall use of our capital, funding, and balance sheet.
We currently act as the remarketing agent for approximately $6.4 billion of variable rate demand
notes, all of which have a financial institution providing a liquidity guarantee. As remarketing
agent for our clients variable rate demand notes, we are the first source of liquidity for sellers
of these instruments. At certain times, demand from buyers of variable rate demand notes is less
than the supply generated by sellers of these instruments. In times of supply and demand imbalance,
we may (but are not obligated to) facilitate liquidity by purchasing variable rate demand notes
from sellers for our own account. Our liquidity risk related to variable rate demand notes is
ultimately mitigated by our ability to tender these securities back to the financial institution
providing the liquidity guarantee.
Credit Risk
Credit risk in our business arises from potential non-performance by counterparties, customers,
borrowers or issuers of securities we hold in our trading inventory. The global credit crisis also
has created increased credit risk, particularly counterparty risk, as the interconnectedness of the
financial markets has caused market participants to be impacted by systemic pressure, or contagion,
that results from the failure or expected failure of large market participants.
We have concentrated counterparty credit exposure with six non-publicly rated entities totaling
$16.3 million at March 31, 2010. This counterparty credit exposure is part of our derivative
program, consisting primarily of interest rate swaps. One derivative counterparty represents 55.6
percent, or $9.0 million, of this exposure. Credit exposure associated with our derivative
counterparties is driven by
39
uncollateralized market movements in the fair value of the interest
rate swap contracts and is monitored regularly by our market and credit risk committee.
We are exposed to credit risk in our role as a trading counterparty to dealers and customers, as a
holder of securities and as a member of exchanges and clearing organizations. Our client activities
involve the execution, settlement and financing of various transactions. Client activities are
transacted on a delivery versus payment, cash or margin basis. Our credit exposure to institutional
client business is mitigated by the use of industry-standard delivery versus payment through
depositories and clearing banks.
Credit exposure associated with our customer margin accounts in the U.S. and Hong Kong is monitored
daily. Our risk management functions have created credit risk policies establishing appropriate
credit limits and collateralization thresholds for our customers utilizing margin lending.
Credit exposure associated with our investments in private company debt instruments are monitored
regularly by our market and credit risk committee. These investments are recorded in other assets
at amortized cost on the consolidated statement of financial condition. At March 31, 2010, we had
three debt investments totaling $13.9 million and one committed, but unfunded loan commitment
totaling $5.0 million.
Our risk management functions review risk associated with institutional counterparties with whom we
hold repurchase and resale agreement facilities, stock borrow or loan facilities, derivatives, TBAs
and other documented institutional counterparty agreements that may give rise to credit exposure.
Counterparty levels are established relative to the level of counterparty ratings and potential
levels of activity.
We are subject to credit concentration risk if we hold large individual securities positions,
execute large transactions with individual counterparties or groups of related counterparties,
extend large loans to individual borrowers or make substantial underwriting commitments.
Concentration risk can occur by industry, geographic area or type of client. Potential credit
concentration risk is carefully monitored and is managed through the use of policies and limits.
We also are exposed to the risk of loss related to changes in the credit spreads of debt
instruments. Credit spread risk arises from potential changes in an issuers credit rating or the
markets perception of the issuers credit worthiness.
Operational Risk
Operational risk refers to the risk of direct or indirect loss resulting from inadequate or failed
internal processes, people and systems or from external events. We rely on the ability of our
employees, our internal systems and processes and systems at computer centers operated by third
parties to process a large number of transactions. In the event of a breakdown or improper
operation of our systems or processes or improper action by our employees or third-party vendors,
we could suffer financial loss, regulatory sanctions and damage to our reputation. We have business
continuity plans in place that we believe will cover critical processes on a company-wide basis,
and redundancies are built into our systems as we have deemed appropriate. These control mechanisms
attempt to ensure that operations policies and procedures are being followed and that our various
businesses are operating within established corporate policies and limits.
Legal, Regulatory and Compliance Risk
Legal, regulatory and compliance risk includes the risk of non-compliance with applicable legal and
regulatory requirements and the risk that a counterpartys performance obligations will be
unenforceable. We are generally subject to extensive regulation in the various jurisdictions in
which we conduct our business. We have established procedures that are designed to ensure
compliance with applicable statutory and regulatory requirements, including, but not limited to,
those related to regulatory net capital requirements, sales and trading practices, use and
safekeeping of customer funds and securities, credit extension, money-laundering, privacy and
recordkeeping.
We have established internal policies relating to ethics and business conduct, and compliance with
applicable legal and regulatory requirements, as well as training and other procedures designed to
ensure that these policies are followed.
40
Reputation and Other Risk
We recognize that maintaining our reputation among clients, investors, regulators and the general
public is critical. Maintaining our reputation depends on a large number of factors, including the
conduct of our business activities and the types of clients and counterparties with whom we conduct
business. We seek to maintain our reputation by conducting our business activities in accordance
with high ethical standards and performing appropriate reviews of clients and counterparties.
Effects of Inflation
Because our assets are generally liquid in nature, they are not significantly affected by
inflation. However, the rate of inflation affects our expenses, such as employee compensation,
office space leasing costs and communications charges, which may not be readily
recoverable in the price of services we offer to our clients. To the extent inflation results in
rising interest rates and has other adverse effects upon the securities markets, it may adversely
affect our financial position and results of operations.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
The information under the caption Enterprise Risk Management in Item 2, Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in this Form 10-Q is incorporated
herein by reference.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on this evaluation, our principal executive
officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are
effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or
submit under the Exchange Act is (a) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and (b) accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure. During the fist quarter of our fiscal year
ending December 31, 2010, there was no change in our system of internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
The following supplements and amends our discussion set forth under Item 3 Legal Proceedings in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
Municipal Derivatives Investigations and Litigation
Defendants filed a motion to dismiss In re Municipal Derivatives Antitrust Litigation, which the
Court denied on March 25, 2010. Also, several California municipalities have brought separate
class action complaints in California, which have since been transferred to the Southern District
of New York and consolidated for pretrial purposes. In addition, approximately eleven California
municipalities have filed individual lawsuits and not as a part of class actions. These individual
California lawsuits have also been transferred to the Southern District of New York and
consolidated for pretrial purposes. All three sets of complaints assert similar claims under
federal (and for the California plaintiffs, state) antitrust claims. The Court has denied
defendants motion to dismiss the California complaints for the great majority of the named
defendants, including Piper Jaffray.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
The discussion of our business and operations should be read together with the risk factors
contained in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2009 filed with the SEC, as updated in our subsequent reports on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC.
These risk factors describe various risks and uncertainties to which we are or may become subject.
These risks and uncertainties have the potential to affect our business, financial condition,
results of operations, cash flows, strategies or prospects in a material and adverse manner.
41
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
The table below sets forth the information with respect to purchases made by or on behalf of Piper
Jaffray Companies or any affiliated purchaser (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934), of our common stock during the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
In addition, a third-party trustee makes open-market purchases of our common stock from time to
time pursuant to the Piper Jaffray Companies Retirement Plan, under which participating employees
may allocate assets to a company stock fund.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
Approximate Dollar Value |
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
of Shares that May Yet Be |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Average Price Paid |
|
Announced Plans or |
|
|
Purchased Under the Plans |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
per Share |
|
Programs |
|
|
or Programs (1) |
Month #1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(January 1, 2010 to January 31, 2010) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
$61 million |
|
Month #2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(February 1, 2010 to February 28, 2010) |
|
|
186,952 |
(2) |
|
$ |
44.48 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
$61 million |
|
Month #3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(March 1, 2010 to March 31, 2010) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
$61 million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
186,952 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
$61 million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On April 16, 2008, we announced that our board of directors had authorized the repurchase
of up to $100 million of common stock through June 30, 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
Consists of shares of common stock withheld from recipients of restricted stock to pay taxes
upon the vesting of the restricted stock. |
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Method of |
Number |
|
Description |
|
Filing |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Letter Agreement between Piper Jaffray Companies and Brien M. OBrien |
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Restricted Stock Agreement with Brien OBrien |
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
First Amendment to Sublease Agreement, by and among U.S. Bancorp and
Piper Jaffray & Co. dated March 26, 2010 |
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer. |
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer. |
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certifications furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
Filed herewith |
42
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on May
7, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIPER JAFFRAY COMPANIES
|
|
|
By /s/ Andrew S. Duff
|
|
|
Its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
By /s/ Debbra L. Schoneman
|
|
|
Its Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
43
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Method of |
Number |
|
Description |
|
Filing |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Letter Agreement between Piper Jaffray Companies and Brien M. OBrien |
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Restricted Stock Agreement with Brien OBrien |
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
First Amendment to Sublease Agreement, by and among U.S. Bancorp and
Piper Jaffray & Co. dated March 26, 2010 |
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer. |
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer. |
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certifications furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
Filed herewith |
44