e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-21923
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Illinois
|
|
36-3873352 |
|
|
|
(State of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
727 North Bank Lane
Lake Forest, Illinois 60045
(Address of principal executive offices)
(847) 615-4096
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
Common Stock no par value, 31,075,534 shares, as of May 6, 2010
PART I
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
(In thousands, except share data) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
106,501 |
|
|
$ |
135,133 |
|
|
$ |
122,207 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements |
|
|
15,393 |
|
|
|
23,483 |
|
|
|
98,454 |
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks ($114,925 restricted for
securitization investors at March 31, 2010) |
|
|
1,222,323 |
|
|
|
1,025,663 |
|
|
|
266,512 |
|
Available-for-sale securities, at fair value |
|
|
1,279,920 |
|
|
|
1,328,815 |
|
|
|
1,413,576 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
39,938 |
|
|
|
33,774 |
|
|
|
13,815 |
|
Brokerage customer receivables |
|
|
20,978 |
|
|
|
20,871 |
|
|
|
15,850 |
|
Loans held-for-sale, at fair value |
|
|
149,897 |
|
|
|
265,786 |
|
|
|
207,107 |
|
Loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or market |
|
|
6,152 |
|
|
|
9,929 |
|
|
|
11,600 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
9,070,562 |
|
|
|
8,411,771 |
|
|
|
7,841,447 |
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
102,397 |
|
|
|
98,277 |
|
|
|
74,248 |
|
|
Net loans ($565,185 restricted for securitization
investors at March 31, 2010) |
|
|
8,968,165 |
|
|
|
8,313,494 |
|
|
|
7,767,199 |
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
348,182 |
|
|
|
350,345 |
|
|
|
349,245 |
|
Accrued interest receivable and other assets |
|
|
363,676 |
|
|
|
416,678 |
|
|
|
263,145 |
|
Trade date securities receivable |
|
|
27,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
278,025 |
|
|
|
278,025 |
|
|
|
276,310 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
12,978 |
|
|
|
13,624 |
|
|
|
13,921 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
12,839,978 |
|
|
$ |
12,215,620 |
|
|
$ |
10,818,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
871,830 |
|
|
$ |
864,306 |
|
|
$ |
745,194 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
8,853,040 |
|
|
|
9,052,768 |
|
|
|
7,880,783 |
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
9,724,870 |
|
|
|
9,917,074 |
|
|
|
8,625,977 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
421,775 |
|
|
|
430,987 |
|
|
|
435,981 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
218,079 |
|
|
|
247,437 |
|
|
|
250,488 |
|
Secured borrowings owed to securitization investors |
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
249,493 |
|
|
|
249,493 |
|
|
|
249,502 |
|
Trade date securities payable |
|
|
62,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,170 |
|
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities |
|
|
137,912 |
|
|
|
170,990 |
|
|
|
115,596 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
11,475,146 |
|
|
|
11,076,981 |
|
|
|
9,755,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A $1,000 liquidation value; 50,000 shares issued and
outstanding at March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and March 31,
2009 |
|
|
49,379 |
|
|
|
49,379 |
|
|
|
49,379 |
|
|
Series B $1,000 liquidation value; 250,000 shares issued
and outstanding at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
236,263 |
|
|
|
235,445 |
|
|
|
233,283 |
|
Common stock, no par value; $1.00 stated value; 60,000,000
shares authorized; 31,044,449, 27,079,308 and 26,765,963
shares issued at March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and March
31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
31,044 |
|
|
|
27,079 |
|
|
|
26,766 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
677,090 |
|
|
|
589,939 |
|
|
|
575,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost, no shares at March 31, 2010 and
2,872,489 shares at December 31, 2009 and 2,854,980 shares at
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(122,733 |
) |
|
|
(122,302 |
) |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
373,903 |
|
|
|
366,152 |
|
|
|
315,855 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(2,847 |
) |
|
|
(6,622 |
) |
|
|
(14,920 |
) |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
1,364,832 |
|
|
|
1,138,639 |
|
|
|
1,063,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
12,839,978 |
|
|
$ |
12,215,620 |
|
|
$ |
10,818,941 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements
1
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees on loans |
|
$ |
129,542 |
|
|
$ |
106,887 |
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks |
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
Securities |
|
|
11,471 |
|
|
|
14,327 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Brokerage customer receivables |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
142,496 |
|
|
|
122,079 |
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on deposits |
|
|
33,212 |
|
|
|
45,953 |
|
Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
4,346 |
|
|
|
4,453 |
|
Interest on notes payable and other borrowings |
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
1,870 |
|
Interest on secured borrowings owed to securitization investors |
|
|
2,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on subordinated notes |
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
Interest on junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
4,375 |
|
|
|
4,441 |
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
46,631 |
|
|
|
57,297 |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
95,865 |
|
|
|
64,782 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
29,044 |
|
|
|
14,473 |
|
|
Net interest income after provision for credit losses |
|
|
66,821 |
|
|
|
50,309 |
|
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth management |
|
|
8,667 |
|
|
|
5,926 |
|
Mortgage banking |
|
|
9,727 |
|
|
|
16,232 |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
3,332 |
|
|
|
2,970 |
|
Gain on sales of premium finance receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
322 |
|
Gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net |
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
(2,038 |
) |
Gain on bargain purchase |
|
|
10,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trading income |
|
|
5,973 |
|
|
|
8,744 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,622 |
|
|
|
4,271 |
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
|
42,607 |
|
|
|
36,427 |
|
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
49,072 |
|
|
|
44,820 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
3,896 |
|
|
|
3,938 |
|
Occupancy, net |
|
|
6,230 |
|
|
|
6,190 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
3,407 |
|
|
|
3,136 |
|
Advertising and marketing |
|
|
1,314 |
|
|
|
1,095 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
3,107 |
|
|
|
2,883 |
|
Amortization of other intangible assets |
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
FDIC insurance |
|
|
3,809 |
|
|
|
3,013 |
|
OREO expense, net |
|
|
1,337 |
|
|
|
2,356 |
|
Other |
|
|
11,121 |
|
|
|
8,844 |
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
|
83,938 |
|
|
|
76,962 |
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
25,490 |
|
|
|
9,774 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
9,473 |
|
|
|
3,416 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
16,017 |
|
|
$ |
6,358 |
|
|
Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion |
|
|
4,943 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
Net income applicable to common shares |
|
$ |
11,074 |
|
|
$ |
1,358 |
|
|
Net income per common share Basic |
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
Net income per common share Diluted |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
25,942 |
|
|
|
23,855 |
|
Dilutive potential common shares |
|
|
1,139 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
Average common shares and dilutive common shares |
|
|
27,081 |
|
|
|
24,076 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
2
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
shareholders |
|
(In thousands) |
|
stock |
|
|
stock |
|
|
Surplus |
|
|
stock |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
income (loss) |
|
|
equity |
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
281,873 |
|
|
$ |
26,611 |
|
|
$ |
571,887 |
|
|
$ |
(122,290 |
) |
|
$ |
318,793 |
|
|
$ |
(10,302 |
) |
|
$ |
1,066,572 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,358 |
|
Other comprehensive income,
net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on
securities, net of
reclassification
adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,694 |
) |
|
|
(5,694 |
) |
Unrealized gains on
derivative Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared on
common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,296 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,296 |
) |
Dividends on preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,211 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,211 |
) |
Accretion on preferred stock |
|
|
789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(789 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock repurchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,772 |
|
Common stock issued for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options and
warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
621 |
|
Restricted stock awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
(705 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(645 |
) |
Director compensation plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
1,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,686 |
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
282,662 |
|
|
$ |
26,766 |
|
|
$ |
575,166 |
|
|
$ |
(122,302 |
) |
|
$ |
315,855 |
|
|
$ |
(14,920 |
) |
|
$ |
1,063,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
284,824 |
|
|
$ |
27,079 |
|
|
$ |
589,939 |
|
|
$ |
(122,733 |
) |
|
$ |
366,152 |
|
|
$ |
(6,622 |
) |
|
$ |
1,138,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,017 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net
of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on
securities, net of
reclassification
adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,095 |
|
|
|
4,095 |
|
Unrealized gains on
derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,948 |
|
Cash dividends declared on
common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,191 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,191 |
) |
Dividends on preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,125 |
) |
Accretion on preferred stock |
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(818 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock repurchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,414 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting for loan
securitizations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,132 |
) |
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
(1,288 |
) |
Common stock issued for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New issuance, net of costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,795 |
|
|
|
83,919 |
|
|
|
122,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210,545 |
|
Exercise of stock options and
warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
1,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,699 |
|
Restricted stock awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(206 |
) |
Employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
495 |
|
Director compensation plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
285,642 |
|
|
$ |
31,044 |
|
|
$ |
677,090 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
373,903 |
|
|
$ |
(2,847 |
) |
|
$ |
1,364,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss): |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities arising during the period, net |
|
$ |
6,798 |
|
|
$ |
(11,314 |
) |
Unrealized (losses) gains on derivative instruments arising during the period, net |
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
1,751 |
|
Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains (losses) included in net income, net |
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
(2,038 |
) |
Less: Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
2,364 |
|
|
|
(2,907 |
) |
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
3,775 |
|
|
$ |
(4,618 |
) |
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
16,017 |
|
|
$ |
6,358 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used
for) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
29,044 |
|
|
|
14,473 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
5,130 |
|
|
|
5,109 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
1,414 |
|
|
|
1,772 |
|
Tax (expense) benefit from stock-based compensation arrangements |
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
(576 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements |
|
(570 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
Net amortization (accretion) of premium on securities |
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
Mortgage servicing rights fair value change and amortization, net |
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
1,659 |
|
Originations and purchases of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
(686,679 |
) |
|
|
(1,245,129 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans held-for-sale |
|
|
816,427 |
|
|
|
1,099,747 |
|
Bank owned life insurance income, net of claims |
|
|
(623 |
) |
|
|
(286 |
) |
Gain on sales of premium finance receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(322 |
) |
Increase in trading securities, net |
|
|
(6,164 |
) |
|
|
(9,416 |
) |
Net (increase) decrease in brokerage customer receivables |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
2,051 |
|
Gain on mortgage loans sold |
|
|
(10,081 |
) |
|
|
(12,209 |
) |
(Gain) loss on available-for-sale securities, net |
|
|
(392 |
) |
|
|
2,038 |
|
Gain on bargain purchase |
|
|
(10,894 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loss on sales of premises and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
Decrease in accrued interest receivable and other assets, net |
|
|
31,080 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
Decrease in accrued interest payable and other liabilities, net |
|
|
(23,813 |
) |
|
|
(2,004 |
) |
|
Net Cash Provided by (Used for) Operating Activities |
|
|
161,136 |
|
|
|
(136,460 |
) |
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
364,778 |
|
|
|
665,932 |
|
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
184,515 |
|
|
|
992,398 |
|
Purchases of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(507,544 |
) |
|
|
(1,504,650 |
) |
Net increase in interest-bearing deposits with banks |
|
|
(81,735 |
) |
|
|
(143,503 |
) |
Net increase in loans |
|
|
(131,153 |
) |
|
|
(251,507 |
) |
Purchases of premises and equipment, net |
|
|
(2,148 |
) |
|
|
(3,766 |
) |
|
Net Cash Used for Investing Activities |
|
|
(173,287 |
) |
|
|
(245,096 |
) |
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in deposit accounts |
|
|
(192,207 |
) |
|
|
249,221 |
|
Decrease in other borrowings, net |
|
|
(29,358 |
) |
|
|
(86,276 |
) |
Decrease in Federal Home Loan Bank advances, net |
|
|
(9,300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs |
|
|
210,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements |
|
570 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
Issuance of common shares resulting from exercise of stock
options, employee stock purchase plan and conversion of common stock
warrants |
|
|
1,593 |
|
|
|
553 |
|
Common stock repurchases |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
(6,316 |
) |
|
|
(7,241 |
) |
|
Net Cash (Used for) Provided by Financing Activities |
|
|
(24,571 |
) |
|
|
156,313 |
|
|
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(36,722 |
) |
|
|
(225,243 |
) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
158,616 |
|
|
|
445,904 |
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
121,894 |
|
|
$ |
220,661 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements of Wintrust Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Wintrust or the Company) presented herein are unaudited, but in the opinion of management
reflect all necessary adjustments of a normal or recurring nature for a fair presentation of
results as of the dates and for the periods covered by the consolidated financial statements.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are unaudited and do not include information or
footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial condition, results of operations or
cash flows in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes
included in the Companys Annual Report and Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (2009 Form 10-K).
Operating results reported for the three-month period are not necessarily indicative of the results
which may be expected for the entire year. Reclassifications of certain prior period amounts have
been made to conform to the current period presentation.
The preparation of the financial statements requires management to make estimates, assumptions and
judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities. Management believes that the
estimates made are reasonable, however, changes in estimates may be required if economic or other
conditions develop differently from managements expectations. Certain policies and accounting
principles inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions and judgments
and as such have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than
originally reported. Management views critical accounting policies to be those which are highly
dependent on subjective or complex judgments, estimates and assumptions, and where changes in those
estimates and assumptions could have a significant impact on the financial statements. Management
currently views the determination of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for losses on
lending-related commitments, estimations of fair value, the valuations required for impairment
testing of goodwill, the valuation and accounting for derivative instruments and income taxes as
the accounting areas that require the most subjective and complex judgments, and as such could be
the most subject to revision as new information becomes available. Descriptions of our significant
accounting policies are included in Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) of the
Companys 2009 Form 10-K.
(2) Recent Accounting Developments
Accounting Standards Codification
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU) No. 2009-01 (formerly FASB No. 168) The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (The Codification). The Accounting
Standards Codification (ASC) reorganized existing U.S. accounting and reporting standards issued
by the FASB and other related private sector standard setters into a single source of authoritative
accounting principles arranged by topic. The Codification superseded all existing U.S. accounting
standards; all other accounting literature not included in the Codification (other than Securities
and Exchange Commission guidance for publicly-traded companies) is considered non-authoritative.
The Codification was effective on a prospective basis for interim and annual reporting periods
ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification changed the Companys references
to U.S. GAAP accounting standards but did not impact the Companys financial statements.
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and Variable Interest Entities
In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-16, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860)
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, amending the Codification for the issuance of FASB
No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 and
ASU No. 2009-17, Consolidation (Topic 810) Improvements to Financial Reporting for Enterprises
Involved with Variable Interest Entities, amending the Codification to change how a company
determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting
(or similar rights) should be consolidated. This guidance became effective for the Company on
January 1, 2010.
ASU No. 2009-16 removed the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity, changed the
requirements for derecognizing financial assets and requires additional disclosures about a
transferors continuing involvement in transferred financial assets. As a result of this
amendment, the Companys securitization transaction is accounted for as a secured borrowing rather
than a sale and the Companys securitization entity (FIFC Premium Funding, LLC) is no longer exempt
from consolidation.
5
ASU No. 2009-17 requires an ongoing assessment of the Companys involvement in the activities of
Variable Interest Entities (VIEs) and the Companys rights or obligations to receive benefits or
absorb losses that could be potentially significant in order to determine whether those VIEs will
be required to be consolidated in the Companys financial statements. In accordance with this
amendment, the Company concluded that it is the primary beneficiary of the Companys securitization
entity and began consolidating this entity on January 1, 2010. The impact of consolidating the
Companys securitization entity on January 1, 2010 resulted in a $587.1 million net increase in
total assets, a $588.4 million net increase in total liabilities and a $1.3 million net decrease in
stockholders equity (comprised of a $1.1 million decrease in retained earnings and a $200,000
decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income).
The assets of the consolidated securitization entity includes interest bearing deposits and premium
finance receivablescommercial, which are restricted to settle the obligations of the
securitization entity. Liabilities of the securitization entity include secured borrowings for
which creditors or beneficial interest holders do not have recourse to the general credit of the
Company.
The Companys statement of income beginning with the three months ended March 31, 2010 no longer
reflects securitization income, but instead reports interest income, net charge-offs and certain
other income associated with the securitized loan receivables in the same line items in the
Companys statement of income as non-securitized premium finance receivables-commercial.
Additionally, the Company no longer records initial gains on new securitization activity since the
transferred loans no longer receive sale accounting treatment. Also, there are no gains or losses
recorded on the revaluation of the interest-only strip receivable as that asset is not recognizable
in a transaction accounted for as a secured borrowing.
The Companys financial statements have not been retrospectively adjusted to reflect the
adjustments to ASC 860. Therefore, current period results and balances may not be comparable to
prior period amounts.
Subsequent Events
In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09, Subsequent Events (Topic 855): Amendments to
Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements, which amends certain provisions of the current
guidance, including the elimination of the requirement for disclosure of the date through which an
evaluation of subsequent events was performed in issued and revised financial statements. This
guidance was effective for interim and annual financial periods ending after February 24, 2010, and
has been applied with no material impact on the Companys financial statements. See Note 18
Subsequent Events, for disclosures relating to subsequent events.
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic
820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements, which amends the disclosure
requirements related to recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. The guidance requires
new disclosures on the transfers of assets and liabilities between Level 1 (quoted prices in active
market for identical assets or liabilities) and Level 2 (significant other observable inputs) of
the fair value measurement hierarchy, including the reasons and the timing of the transfers.
Additionally, the guidance requires a roll forward of activities on purchases, sales, issuance, and
settlements of the assets and liabilities measured using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3
fair value measurements). The guidance became effective for the Company with the reporting period
beginning January 1, 2010, except for the disclosure on the roll forward activities for Level 3
fair value measurements, which will become effective for the Company with the reporting period
beginning January 1, 2011. Other than requiring additional disclosures, the adoption of this new
guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. See Note 15
Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities.
In April 2009, the FASB issued new guidance related to the disclosure of the fair value of
financial instruments. The new guidance, which is now part of ASC 825, Financial Instruments,
requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments whenever a publicly traded company
issues financial information in interim reporting periods in addition to the annual disclosure
required at year-end. The provisions of the new guidance were effective for interim periods ending
after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted the new guidance in the second quarter of 2009. See Note 5
Available-for-sale Securities, for the required disclosures in accordance with this guidance.
6
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
In April 2009, the FASB issued new guidance for the accounting for other-than temporary
impairments. The new guidance, which is now part of ASC 320 Investments Debt and Equity
Securities (ASC 320), amended the other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) guidance in GAAP for
debt securities and the presentation and disclosure requirements of OTTI on debt and equity
securities in the financial statements. This new guidance does not amend existing recognition and
measurement guidance related to OTTI of equity securities. The new guidance requires separate
display of losses related to credit deterioration and losses related to other market factors. When
an entity does not intend to sell the security and it is more likely than not that an entity will
not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis, it must recognize the credit
component of OTTI in earnings and the remaining portion in other comprehensive income. The new
guidance was effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early
adoption permitted. The Company adopted the new guidance in the second quarter of 2009. See Note 5
Available-for-sale Securities, for a further discussion on the adoption of the new guidance.
Additional Fair Value Measurement Guidance
In April 2009, the FASB issued new guidance for determining when a transaction is not orderly and
for estimating fair value when there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of
activity for an asset or liability. The new guidance, which is now part of ASC 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820), requires disclosure of the inputs and valuation techniques
used, as well as any changes in valuation techniques and inputs used during the period, to measure
fair value in interim and annual periods. In addition, the presentation of the fair value hierarchy
is required to be presented by major security type as described in ASC 320. The provisions of the
new guidance were effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of the new
guidance in the second quarter of 2009 did not have a material effect on the Companys financial
statements.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
In March 2008, the FASB issued new guidance on the disclosure of derivative instruments and hedging
activities. The new guidance, which is now a part of ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging Activities,
requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives,
quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of, and gains and losses on, derivative
instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative
agreements. The provisions of the new guidance were effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. See Note 14 Derivative Financial Instruments,
for the required disclosures in accordance with this new guidance.
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements
In December 2007, the FASB issued new guidance for the accounting for noncontrolling interests. The
new guidance, which is now part of ASC 810, Consolidation, establishes accounting and reporting
standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. The guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The
adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
Business Combinations
In April 2009, the FASB issued revised guidance for recognizing and measuring pre-acquisition
contingencies in a business combination. The revised guidance, which is now part of ASC 805,
Business Combinations, revises the definition of a business and amends and clarifies prior
guidance to address application issues on initial recognition and measurement, subsequent
measurement and accounting, and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in
a business combination. The revised guidance is effective for assets or liabilities arising from
contingencies in business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the first
annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of the revised
guidance did not have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued revised guidance for the accounting for business combinations.
The revised guidance, which is now part of ASC 805, Business Combinations (ASC 805), requires the
acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize the full fair value of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition date; the immediate expense recognition
of transaction costs; and accounting for restructuring plans separately from the business
combination. The application of ASC 805 eliminates separate recognition of the acquired allowance
for loan losses on the acquirers balance sheet as credit related factors will be incorporated
directly into the fair value of the loans recorded at the acquisition date. The application of ASC
805 was effective for business combinations occurring after December 15, 2008. The Company applied
ASC 805 to its July 28, 2009 acquisition of a portfolio of life insurance premium finance assets.
See Note 3 Business Combinations, for more information on ASC 805.
7
(3) Business Combinations
On July 28, 2009, FIFC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, purchased the majority of the
U.S. life insurance premium finance assets of A.I. Credit Corp. and A.I. Credit Consumer Discount
Company (the sellers), subsidiaries of American International Group, Inc. After giving effect to
post-closing adjustments, an aggregate unpaid loan balance of $949.3 million was purchased for
$685.3 million in cash. At closing, a portion of the portfolio, with an aggregate unpaid loan
balance of $321.1 million, and a corresponding portion of the purchase price of $232.8 million were
placed in escrow, pending the receipt of required third party consents. During the first quarter
of 2010, based upon receipt of consents, the escrow was terminated and remaining funds released to
the sellers and FIFC.
Also, as a part of the purchase, $84.4 million of additional life insurance premium finance assets
were available for future purchase by FIFC subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. On
October 2, 2009, the conditions were satisfied in relation to the majority of the additional life
insurance premium finance assets and FIFC purchased $83.4 million of the $84.4 million of life
insurance premium finance assets available for an aggregate purchase price of $60.5 million in
cash.
Both purchases were accounted for as a single business combination under the acquisition method of
accounting as required by applicable accounting guidance. Accordingly, the impact related to this
transaction is included in the Companys financial statements only since the effective date of
acquisition. The purchased assets and assumed liabilities were recorded at their respective
acquisition date fair values, and identifiable intangible assets were recorded at fair value. Under
ASC 805 a gain is recorded equal to the amount by which the fair value of assets purchased exceeded
the fair value of liabilities assumed and consideration paid. As such, the Company recognized a
$10.9 million bargain purchase gain in the first quarter of 2010, a $43.0 million bargain purchase
gain in the fourth quarter of 2009 and a $113.1 million bargain purchase gain in the third quarter
of 2009, relating to the loans acquired for which all contingencies were removed. As of March
31, 2010, the full amount of the bargain purchase gain has been recognized into income. This gain
is shown as a component of non-interest income on the Companys Consolidated Statement of Income.
The difference between the fair value of the loans acquired and the outstanding principal balance
of these loans at the date of purchase represented a discount of $121.8 million and is comprised of
two components, an accretable component totaling $80.5 million and a non-accretable component
totaling $41.3 million. The accretable component is being recognized into interest income using the
effective yield method over the estimated remaining life of the loans. The non-accretable portion
will be evaluated each quarter and if the loans credit related conditions improve, a portion will
be transferred to the accretable component and accreted over future periods. In the event a
specific loan prepays in whole, any remaining accretable and non-accretable discount is recognized
in income immediately. If credit related conditions deteriorate, an allowance related to these
loans will be established as part of the provision for credit losses. See Note 4 Loans, for more
information on loans acquired with evidence of credit quality deterioration since origination.
The following table summarizes the fair value of assets acquired and the resulting bargain purchase
gain at the date of acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
910,873 |
|
Customer list intangible |
|
|
1,800 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
912,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Paid |
|
|
745,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total bargain purchase gain recognized |
|
$ |
166,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation of the Fair Value of Loans Acquired
The Company determined the fair value of the loans acquired with the assistance of an independent
third party valuation firm which utilized a discounted cash flow analysis to estimate the fair
value of the loan portfolio. Primary factors impacting the estimated cash flows in the valuation
model were certain income and expense items and changes in the estimated future balances of loans.
The significant assumptions used in calculating the fair value of the loans acquired included
estimating interest income, loan losses, servicing costs, costs of funding, and life of the loans.
Interest income on variable rate loans within the loan portfolio was determined based on the
weighted average interest rate spread plus the contractual Libor rate. Interest income on fixed
rate loans was based on the actual weighted average interest rate of the fixed rate loan portfolio.
8
Loan losses were estimated by first estimating the loan losses which would result from default by
either the insurance carrier or the insured and, second, estimating the probability of default for
both the insurance carrier and the insured.
Estimated losses upon default by the insurance carrier were estimated by assigning realization
rates to each type of collateral underlying the loan portfolio. Realization rates on collateral
after default by the insurance carrier were estimated for each type of collateral. Unsecured
portions of the collateral were also assigned a loss rate.
Estimated losses upon default by the insured were similar to the estimated loss rates calculated
upon default by the insurance carrier.
The probability of default of the insurance carrier was determined by assigning each insurance
carrier holding collateral underlying the portfolio a default rate from a national rating agency
and a study of historical cumulative default rates prepared by such agency.
The probability of default by individuals was estimated based upon consideration of the financial
and demographic characteristics of the insured and the economic uncertainty present at the
valuation date.
The estimated life of the loans was based on expected required fundings of life insurance premiums
and the expected life of the insured based on the age of the insured and survival curves.
(4) Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, the Company considers cash and cash
equivalents to include cash on hand, cash items in the process of collection, non-interest bearing
amounts due from correspondent banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale
agreements with original maturities of three months or less.
9
(5)Available-for-sale Securities
The following tables are a summary of the available-for-sale securities portfolio as of the dates
shown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
121,026 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(10,149 |
) |
|
$ |
110,877 |
|
U.S. Government agencies |
|
|
558,600 |
|
|
|
1,002 |
|
|
|
(1,464 |
) |
|
|
558,138 |
|
Municipal |
|
|
59,775 |
|
|
|
1,714 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
61,423 |
|
Corporate notes and other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial issuers (1) |
|
|
40,366 |
|
|
|
1,287 |
|
|
|
(2,025 |
) |
|
|
39,628 |
|
Other |
|
|
38,698 |
|
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
39,804 |
|
Mortgage-backed: (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
|
194,010 |
|
|
|
11,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205,693 |
|
Non-agency CMOs |
|
|
97,445 |
|
|
|
7,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,881 |
|
Non-agency CMOs Alt A |
|
|
49,186 |
|
|
|
1,175 |
|
|
|
(502 |
) |
|
|
49,859 |
|
Federal Reserve and FHLB stock |
|
|
74,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,002 |
|
Other equity securities |
|
|
35,509 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
1,268,617 |
|
|
$ |
25,627 |
|
|
$ |
(14,324 |
) |
|
$ |
1,279,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
121,310 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(10,494 |
) |
|
$ |
110,816 |
|
U.S. Government agencies |
|
|
579,249 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
(3,623 |
) |
|
|
576,176 |
|
Municipal |
|
|
63,344 |
|
|
|
2,195 |
|
|
|
(203 |
) |
|
|
65,336 |
|
Corporate notes and other debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial issuers (1) |
|
|
42,241 |
|
|
|
1,518 |
|
|
|
(2,013 |
) |
|
|
41,746 |
|
Retained subordinated securities |
|
|
47,448 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,702 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
|
205,257 |
|
|
|
11,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216,544 |
|
Non-agency CMOs |
|
|
102,045 |
|
|
|
6,133 |
|
|
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
107,984 |
|
Non-agency CMOs Alt A |
|
|
51,306 |
|
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
(1,553 |
) |
|
|
50,778 |
|
Federal Reserve/FHLB stock |
|
|
73,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,749 |
|
Other equity securities |
|
|
37,969 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
1,323,918 |
|
|
$ |
22,977 |
|
|
$ |
(18,080 |
) |
|
$ |
1,328,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
To the extent investments in trust-preferred securities are included, they are direct issues and do not include pooled
trust-preferred securities. |
|
(2) |
|
Consisting entirely of residential mortgage-backed securities, none of which are subprime. |
10
The following tables present the portion of the Companys available-for-sale securities portfolio
which has gross unrealized losses, reflecting the length of time that individual securities have
been in a continuous unrealized loss position at March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuous unrealized |
|
Continuous unrealized |
|
|
|
|
losses existing for |
|
losses existing for |
|
|
|
|
less than 12 months |
|
greater than 12 months |
|
Total |
|
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
value |
|
losses |
|
value |
|
losses |
|
value |
|
losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,877 |
|
|
|
(10,149 |
) |
|
|
110,877 |
|
|
|
(10,149 |
) |
U.S. Government agencies |
|
|
171,073 |
|
|
|
(542 |
) |
|
|
51,732 |
|
|
|
(922 |
) |
|
|
222,805 |
|
|
|
(1,464 |
) |
Municipal |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2,014 |
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
2,229 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
Corporate notes and other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial issuers |
|
|
18,253 |
|
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
4,063 |
|
|
|
(1,876 |
) |
|
|
22,316 |
|
|
|
(2,025 |
) |
Other |
|
|
20,163 |
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,163 |
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
Mortgage-backed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-agency CMOs
Alt A |
|
|
32,133 |
|
|
|
(502 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,133 |
|
|
|
(502 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
241,837 |
|
|
|
(1,312 |
) |
|
|
168,686 |
|
|
|
(13,012 |
) |
|
|
410,523 |
|
|
|
(14,324 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company conducts a regular assessment of its investment securities to determine whether
securities are other-than-temporarily impaired considering, among other factors, the nature of the
securities, credit ratings or financial condition of the issuer, the extent and duration of the
unrealized loss, expected cash flows, market conditions and the Companys ability to hold the
securities through the anticipated recovery period.
The Company does not consider securities with unrealized losses at March 31, 2010 to be
other-than-temporarily impaired. The Company does not intend to sell these investments and it is
more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell these investments before
recovery of the amortized cost bases, which may be the maturity dates of the securities. The
unrealized losses within each category have occurred as a result of changes in interest rates,
market spreads and market conditions subsequent to purchase. Securities with continuous unrealized
losses existing for more than twelve months were primarily U.S. Treasury securities and corporate
securities of financial issuers. The corporate securities of financial issuers in this category
were comprised of three trust-preferred securities with high investment grades. These obligations
have interest rates significantly below the rates at which these types of obligations are currently
issued, and have maturity dates in 2027 and 2031. Although they are currently callable by the
issuers, it is unlikely that they will be called in the near future as the interest rates are very
attractive to the issuers. A review of the issuers indicated that they have recently raised equity
capital and/or have strong capital ratios. The Company does not own any pooled trust-preferred
securities.
Effective April 1, 2009, the Company adopted new guidance for the measurement and recognition of
other than temporary impairment for debt securities, which is now part of ASC 320. The new guidance
provides that if an entity does not intend to sell, and it is more likely than not that the entity
will not be required to sell a debt security before recovery of its cost basis, impairment should
be separated into (a) the amount representing credit loss and (b) the amount related to all other
factors. The amount of impairment related to credit loss is recognized in earnings and the
impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss). To
determine the amount related to credit loss, the Company applies a method similar to that described
by ASC 310, using a single best estimate of expected cash flows. The Companys adoption of this
guidance for the measurement and changes in the amount of credit losses recognized in net income on
these corporate debt securities are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
(472 |
) |
Credit losses recognized |
|
|
|
|
Reductions for securities sold during the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
(472 |
) |
|
|
|
|
11
During the first quarter of 2009, the Company recorded $2.1 million of other than temporary
impairment on certain corporate debt securities. The following table provides information as to the
amount of gross gains and gross losses realized and proceeds received through the sales of
available-for-sale investment securities (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Realized gains |
|
$ |
507 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
Realized losses |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
Net realized gains |
|
$ |
392 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
Other than temporary impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,135 |
|
|
|
|
(Losses) gains on available- for-sale securities, net |
|
$ |
392 |
|
|
|
(2,038 |
) |
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
184,515 |
|
|
|
992,398 |
|
|
|
|
The amortized cost and fair value of securities as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, by
contractual maturity, are shown in the following table. Contractual maturities may differ from
actual maturities as borrowers may have the right to call or repay obligations with or without call
or prepayment penalties. Mortgage-backed securities are not included in the maturity categories in
the following maturity summary as actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because
the underlying mortgages may be called or prepaid without penalties (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Fair |
|
Amortized |
|
Fair |
|
|
cost |
|
value |
|
cost |
|
value |
|
|
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
149,128 |
|
|
|
149,202 |
|
|
|
111,380 |
|
|
|
111,860 |
|
Due in one to five years |
|
|
251,153 |
|
|
|
251,750 |
|
|
|
221,294 |
|
|
|
222,152 |
|
Due in five to ten years |
|
|
265,272 |
|
|
|
256,913 |
|
|
|
328,914 |
|
|
|
318,796 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
152,912 |
|
|
|
152,005 |
|
|
|
192,004 |
|
|
|
188,968 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
340,641 |
|
|
|
360,433 |
|
|
|
358,608 |
|
|
|
375,306 |
|
Federal Reserve/FHLB Stock |
|
|
74,002 |
|
|
|
74,002 |
|
|
|
73,749 |
|
|
|
73,749 |
|
Other equity |
|
|
35,509 |
|
|
|
35,615 |
|
|
|
37,969 |
|
|
|
37,984 |
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
1,268,617 |
|
|
|
1,279,920 |
|
|
|
1,323,918 |
|
|
|
1,328,815 |
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, securities having a carrying value of $853 million
and $865 million, respectively, which include securities traded but not yet settled, were pledged
as collateral for public deposits, trust deposits, FHLB advances, securities sold under repurchase
agreements and derivatives. At March 31, 2010, there were no securities of a single issuer, other
than U.S. Government-sponsored agency securities, which exceeded 10% of shareholders equity.
12
(6) Loans
The following table shows the Companys loan portfolio by category as of March 31, 2010, December
31, 2009 and March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Balance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real estate |
|
$ |
5,083,052 |
|
|
$ |
5,039,906 |
|
|
$ |
4,933,355 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
924,993 |
|
|
|
930,482 |
|
|
|
920,412 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
322,984 |
|
|
|
306,296 |
|
|
|
280,808 |
|
Premium finance receivables commercial |
|
|
1,317,822 |
|
|
|
730,144 |
|
|
|
1,287,261 |
|
Premium finance receivables life insurance |
|
|
1,233,573 |
|
|
|
1,197,893 |
|
|
|
130,895 |
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
83,136 |
|
|
|
98,134 |
|
|
|
154,257 |
|
Other loans |
|
|
105,002 |
|
|
|
108,916 |
|
|
|
134,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of unearned income |
|
$ |
9,070,562 |
|
|
$ |
8,411,771 |
|
|
$ |
7,841,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mix: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real estate |
|
|
56 |
% |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
63 |
% |
Home equity |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Premium finance receivables commercial |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Premium finance receivables life insurance |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Other loans |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain premium finance receivables are recorded net of unearned income. The unearned income
portions of such premium finance receivables were $37.1 million at March 31, 2010, $31.8 million at
December 31, 2009 and $28.8 million at March 31, 2009. Certain life insurance premium finance receivables
are also recorded net of credit discounts attributable to the life insurance premium finance loan
acquisition in the third and fourth quarters of 2009. See Acquired Loan Information at
Acquisition, below.
The $587.7 million increase in commercial premium finance receivables at March 31, 2010 compared to December 31, 2009 is primarily due to the third quarter 2009 securitization transaction that is now accounted for as a secured borrowing.
Indirect consumer loans include auto, boat and other indirect consumer loans. Total loans,
excluding loans acquired with evidence of credit quality deterioration since origination, include
net deferred loan fees and costs and fair value purchase accounting adjustments totaling $11.9
million at March 31, 2010, $10.7 million at December 31, 2009 and $9.6 million at March 31, 2009.
The Companys loan portfolio is generally comprised of loans to consumers and small to medium-sized
businesses located within the geographic market areas that the Banks serve. The premium finance
receivables portfolios are made to customers on a national basis and the majority of the indirect
consumer loans were generated through a network of local automobile dealers. As a result, the
Company strives to maintain a loan portfolio that is diverse in terms of loan type, industry,
borrower and geographic concentrations. Such diversification reduces the exposure to economic
downturns that may occur in different segments of the economy or in different industries.
It is the policy of the Company to review each prospective credit in order to determine the
appropriateness and, when required, the adequacy of security or collateral necessary to obtain when
making a loan. The type of collateral, when required, will vary from liquid assets to real estate.
The Company seeks to assure access to collateral, in the event of default, through adherence to
state lending laws and the Companys credit monitoring procedures.
Acquired Loan Information at Acquisition Loans with evidence of credit quality deterioration since origination
As part of our acquisition of a portfolio of life insurance premium finance loans in 2009, we
acquired loans for which there was evidence of credit quality deterioration since origination and
we determined that it was probable that the Company would be unable to collect all contractually
required principal and interest payments. These loans had an unpaid principal balance of $1.0
billion and a carrying value of $896.3 million at acquisition. At March 31, 2010, the unpaid
principal balance and carrying value of these loans were $959.0 million and $867.0 million,
respectively.
13
The following table provides details on these loans at acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractually required payments including interest |
|
$ |
1,032,714 |
|
Less: Nonaccretable difference |
|
|
41,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows expected to be collected (1) |
|
|
991,433 |
|
Less: Accretable yield |
|
|
80,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of loans acquired with evidence of credit quality deterioration since origination |
|
$ |
910,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents undiscounted expected principal and interest cash flows at acquisition. |
The allowance for loan losses associated with this portfolio of loans was $607,000 at March 31,
2010 and $615,000 at December 31, 2009. This allowance represents deterioration to the portfolio
subsequent to acquisition.
Accretable Yield Activity
The following table provides activity for the accretable yield of these loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three |
|
|
|
Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretable yield, balance at 12/31/09 |
|
$ |
65,026 |
|
Accretable yield amortized to interest income |
|
|
(9,134 |
) |
Reclassification from the non-accretable difference (1) |
|
|
2,289 |
|
Reclassification to the non-accretable difference (2) |
|
|
(144) |
|
|
|
|
|
Accretable yield, balance at 3/31/10 |
|
$ |
58,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reclassification from non-accretable difference represents an increase to the estimated cash flows to be
collected on the underlying portfolio. |
(2) |
|
Reclassification to the non-accretable difference represents a decrease to the estimated cash flows to be collected on the underlying portfolio. |
(7) Allowance for Loan Losses, Allowance for Losses on Lending-Related Commitments and Impaired Loans
The following table presents a summary of the activity in the allowance for credit losses for the
periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period |
|
$ |
98,277 |
|
|
$ |
69,767 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
29,044 |
|
|
|
14,473 |
|
Other adjustments allowance for loan losses related to
consolidation of securitization entity |
|
|
1,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification to allowance for losses on lending-related commitments |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(27,992 |
) |
|
|
(10,386 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses at period end |
|
$ |
102,397 |
|
|
$ |
74,248 |
|
Allowance for losses on lending-related commitments at period end |
|
|
3,653 |
|
|
|
1,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses at period end |
|
$ |
106,050 |
|
|
$ |
75,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
A summary of non-accrual, impaired loans and loans past due greater than 90 days and still
accruing interest are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Non-performing loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans past due greater than 90 days and still accruing interest |
|
$ |
14,830 |
|
|
$ |
7,800 |
|
|
$ |
16,482 |
|
Non-accrual loans |
|
|
126,130 |
|
|
|
124,004 |
|
|
|
159,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
$ |
140,960 |
|
|
$ |
131,804 |
|
|
$ |
175,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans (included in Non-performing loans): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans with an allowance for loan loss required (1) |
|
$ |
68,805 |
|
|
$ |
58,222 |
|
|
$ |
101,686 |
|
Impaired loans with no allowance for loan loss required |
|
|
17,123 |
|
|
|
14,914 |
|
|
|
12,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans (included in Non-performing loans) |
|
$ |
85,928 |
|
|
$ |
73,136 |
|
|
$ |
113,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses related to impaired loans |
|
$ |
17,995 |
|
|
$ |
17,567 |
|
|
$ |
23,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructured loans |
|
$ |
69,381 |
|
|
$ |
32,432 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These impaired loans require an allowance for loan losses because the estimated fair value of
the loans or related collateral is less than the recorded investment in the loans. |
The average recorded investment in impaired loans was $79.5 million and $101.7 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
(8) Loan Securitization
During the third quarter of 2009, the Company entered into an off-balance sheet revolving period
securitization transaction sponsored by FIFC. In connection with the securitization, premium
finance receivables commercial were transferred to FIFC Premium Funding, LLC (the
securitization entity). Provided that certain coverage test criteria continue to be met,
principal collections on loans in the securitization entity are used to subsequently acquire and
transfer additional loans into the securitization entity during the stated revolving period.
Additionally, upon the occurrence of certain events established in the representations and
warranties, FIFC may be required to repurchase ineligible loans that were transferred to the
entity. As of March 31, 2010, no loans have been repurchased. The Companys primary continuing
involvement includes servicing the loans, retaining an undivided interest (the sellers interest)
in the loans, and holding certain retained interests.
Instruments issued by the securitization entity included $600 million Class A notes that bear an
annual interest rate of one-month LIBOR plus 1.45% (the Notes) and have an expected average term
of 2.93 years with any unpaid balance due and payable in full on February 17, 2014. At the time of
issuance, the Notes were eligible collateral under the Federal Reserve Bank of New Yorks Term
Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF). Class B and Class C notes (Subordinated
securities), which are recorded in the form of zero coupon bonds, were also issued and were
retained by the Company.
Subsequent to December 31, 2009, this securitization transaction is accounted for as a secured
borrowing and the securitization entity is treated as a consolidated subsidiary of the Company
under ASC 810 and ASC 860. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of
changes to the accounting for transfers and servicing of financial assets and consolidation of
variable interest entities, including the elimination of qualifying SPEs. Accordingly, beginning on
January 1, 2010, all of the assets and liabilities of the securitization entity are included
directly on the Companys Consolidated Statement of Condition. The securitization entitys
receivables underlying third-party investors interests are recorded in loans, net of unearned
incomerestricted for securitization investors, an allowance for loan losses was established and
the related debt issued is reported in secured borrowingsowed to securitization investors.
Additionally, beginning on January 1, 2010, certain other of the Companys retained interests in
the transaction, principally consisting of subordinated securities, cash collateral, and
overcollateralization of loans, now constitute intercompany positions, which are eliminated in the
preparation of the Companys Consolidated Statement of Condition.
Upon transfer of premium finance receivables commercial to the securitization entity, the
receivables and certain cash flows derived from them become restricted for use in meeting
obligations to the securitization entitys creditors. The securitization entity has ownership of
interest-bearing deposit balances that also have restrictions, the amounts of which are reported in
interest-bearing deposits with other banksrestricted for securitization investors. Investment of
the interest-bearing deposit balances is limited to investments that are permitted under the
governing documents of the transaction. With the exception of the sellers interest in the
transferred receivables, the Companys interests in the securitization entitys assets are
generally subordinate to the interests of third-party investors and, as such, may not be realized by the Company if needed to absorb deficiencies
in cash flows that are allocated to the investors in the securitization entitys debt.
15
The carrying values and classification of the restricted assets and liabilities relating to the
securitization activities are shown in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash collateral accounts |
|
$ |
1,759 |
|
Collections and interest funding accounts |
|
|
113,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits with banks restricted for securitization investors |
|
|
114,925 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income restricted for securitization investors |
|
|
567,109 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(1,924 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net loans restricted for securitization investors |
|
|
565,185 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
681,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured borrowings owed to securitization investors |
|
$ |
600,000 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
3,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
603,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
The assets of the consolidated securitization entity are subject to credit, payment and
interest rate risks on the transferred premium finance receivables commercial. To protect
investors, the securitization structure includes certain features that could result in
earlier-than-expected repayment of the securities. Investors are allocated cash flows derived from
activities related to the accounts comprising the securitized pool of receivables, the amounts of
which reflect finance charges collected net of agent fees, certain fee assessments, and recoveries
on charged-off accounts. From these cash flows, investors are reimbursed for charge-offs occurring
within the securitized pool of receivables and receive the contractual rate of return and FIFC is
paid a servicing fee as servicer. Any cash flows remaining in excess of these requirements are
reported to investors as net yield and remitted to the Company. A net yield rate of less than 0%
for a three month period would trigger an economic early amortization event. In addition to this
performance measurement associated with the transferred loans, there are additional performance
measurements and other events or conditions which could trigger an early amortization event. In
such an event, the Company would be required to seek immediate sources of replacement funding. As
of March 31, 2010, no economic or other early amortization events have occurred. Apart from the
restricted assets related to securitization activities, the investors and the securitization entity
have no recourse to the Companys other assets or credit for a shortage in cash flows.
The Company continues to service the loan receivables held by the securitization entity. FIFC
receives a monthly servicing fee from the securitization entity based on a percentage of the
monthly investor principal balance outstanding. Although the fee income to FIFC offsets the fee
expense to the securitization entity and thus is eliminated in consolidation, failure to service
the transferred loan receivables in accordance with contractual requirements could lead to a
termination of the servicing rights and the loss of future servicing income.
16
(9) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
A summary of the Companys goodwill assets by business segment is presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
Acquired |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
2010 |
|
Community banking |
|
$ |
247,601 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
247,601 |
|
Specialty finance |
|
|
16,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,095 |
|
Wealth management |
|
|
14,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
278,025 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
278,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No adjustments were made to goodwill in the first three months of 2010. Pursuant to the
acquisition of PMP in December 2008, Wintrust may be required to pay contingent consideration to
the former owner of PMP as a result of attaining certain performance measures through December
2011. Any contingent payments made pursuant to this transaction would be reflected as increases in
the Community banking segments goodwill.
A summary of finite-lived intangible assets as of March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and March 31,
2009 and the expected amortization as of March 31, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Customer list intangibles: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
$ |
5,052 |
|
|
$ |
5,052 |
|
|
$ |
3,252 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(3,360 |
) |
|
|
(3,307 |
) |
|
|
(3,127 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount |
|
|
1,692 |
|
|
|
1,745 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit intangibles: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
|
27,918 |
|
|
|
27,918 |
|
|
|
27,918 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(16,632 |
) |
|
|
(16,039 |
) |
|
|
(14,122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount |
|
|
11,286 |
|
|
|
11,879 |
|
|
|
13,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other intangible assets, net |
|
$ |
12,978 |
|
|
$ |
13,624 |
|
|
$ |
13,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
Actual in 3 months ended March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
645 |
|
Estimated remaining in 2010 |
|
|
1,920 |
|
Estimated 2011 |
|
|
2,461 |
|
Estimated 2012 |
|
|
2,436 |
|
Estimated 2013 |
|
|
2,394 |
|
Estimated 2014 |
|
|
2,074 |
|
The customer list intangibles recognized in connection with the purchase of U.S. life insurance
premium finance assets in 2009 are being amortized over an 18-year period on an accelerated basis.
The customer list intangibles recognized in connection with the acquisitions of Lake Forest Capital Management in 2003 and Wayne Hummer Asset Management Company in 2002, were being amortized over seven-year periods on an accelerated basis and were fully amortized in the first quarter of 2010 and first quarter of 2009, respectively.
The core deposit intangibles recognized in connection with the Companys bank acquisitions are
being amortized over ten-year periods on an accelerated basis.
Total amortization expense associated with finite-lived intangibles totaled approximately $645,000
and $687,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
17
(10) Depsits
The following table is a summary of deposits as of the dates shown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Balance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits |
|
$ |
871,830 |
|
|
$ |
864,306 |
|
|
$ |
745,194 |
|
NOW accounts |
|
|
1,448,857 |
|
|
|
1,415,856 |
|
|
|
1,064,663 |
|
Wealth management deposits |
|
|
690,919 |
|
|
|
971,113 |
|
|
|
833,291 |
|
Money market accounts |
|
|
1,586,830 |
|
|
|
1,534,632 |
|
|
|
1,313,157 |
|
Savings accounts |
|
|
558,770 |
|
|
|
561,916 |
|
|
|
406,376 |
|
Time certificates of deposit |
|
|
4,567,664 |
|
|
|
4,569,251 |
|
|
|
4,263,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
9,724,870 |
|
|
$ |
9,917,074 |
|
|
$ |
8,625,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mix: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
NOW accounts |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Wealth management deposits |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Money market accounts |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Savings accounts |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Time certificates of deposit |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth management deposits represent deposit balances (primarily money market accounts) at the
Companys subsidiary banks from brokerage customers of Wayne Hummer Investments, trust and asset
management customers of Wayne Hummer Trust Company and brokerage customers from unaffiliated
companies.
(11) Notes Payable, Federal Home Loan Bank Advances, Other Borrowings, Secured Borrowings and Subordinated Notes
The following table is a summary of notes payable, Federal Home Loan Bank advances, other
borrowings, secured borrowings and subordinated notes as of the dates shown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Notes payable |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
421,775 |
|
|
|
430,987 |
|
|
|
435,981 |
|
|
Other borrowings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under repurchase agreements |
|
|
216,293 |
|
|
|
245,640 |
|
|
|
248,660 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,786 |
|
|
|
1,797 |
|
|
|
1,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other borrowings |
|
|
218,079 |
|
|
|
247,437 |
|
|
|
250,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured borrowings owed to securitization investors |
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total notes payable, Federal Home Loan
Bank advances, other borrowings, secured
borrowings and subordinated notes |
|
$ |
1,300,854 |
|
|
$ |
739,424 |
|
|
$ |
757,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010, the Company had notes payable with a $1.0 million outstanding balance, with
an interest rate of 4.50%, under a $51.0 million loan agreement (Agreement) with unaffiliated
banks. The Agreement consists of a $50.0 million revolving note, maturing on October 30, 2010, and
a $1.0 million note maturing on June 1, 2015. At March 31, 2010, there was no outstanding balance
on the $50.0 million revolving note. Borrowings under the Agreement that are considered Base Rate
Loans will bear interest at a rate equal to the higher of (1) 450 basis points and (2) for the
applicable period, the highest of (a) the federal funds rate plus 100 basis points, (b) the
lenders prime rate plus 50 basis points, and (c) the Eurodollar Rate (as defined below) that would
be applicable for an interest period of one month plus 150 basis points. Borrowings under the
Agreement that are considered Eurodollar
Rate Loans will bear interest at a rate equal to the higher of (1) the British Bankers
Associations LIBOR rate for the applicable period plus 350 basis points (the Eurodollar Rate)
and (2) 450 basis points.
18
Commencing August 2009, a commitment fee is payable quarterly equal to 0.50% of the actual daily
amount by which the lenders commitment under the revolving note exceeded the amount outstanding
under such facility.
The Agreement is secured by the stock of some of the banks and contains several restrictive
covenants, including the maintenance of various capital adequacy levels, asset quality and
profitability ratios, and certain restrictions on dividends and other indebtedness. At March 31,
2010, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants. The Agreement is available to be
utilized, as needed, to provide capital to fund continued growth at the Companys banks and to
serve as an interim source of funds for acquisitions, common stock repurchases or other general
corporate purposes.
Federal Home Loan Bank advances consist of fixed rate obligations of the banks and are
collateralized by qualifying residential real estate and home equity loans and certain securities.
FHLB advances are stated at par value of the debt adjusted for unamortized fair value adjustments
recorded in connection with advances acquired through acquisitions as well as unamortized
prepayment fees recorded in connection with debt restructurings. In the first quarter of 2010, the
Company restructured $38.0 million of existing FHLB advances in order to achieve lower advance
interest rates.
At March 31, 2010 securities sold under repurchase agreements represent $66.3 million of customer
balances in sweep accounts in connection with master repurchase agreements at the banks and $150.0
million of short-term borrowings from brokers.
During the third quarter of 2009, the Company entered into an off-balance sheet securitization
transaction sponsored by FIFC. In connection with the securitization, premium finance receivables -
commercial were transferred to FIFC Premium Funding, LLC, a qualifying special purpose entity (the
QSPE). The QSPE issued $600 million Class A notes that bear an annual interest rate of one-month
LIBOR plus 1.45% (the Notes) and have an expected average term of 2.93 years with any unpaid
balance due and payable in full on February 17, 2014. At the time of issuance, the Notes were
eligible collateral under TALF. The Notes are rated Aaa by Moodys and AAA by Standard & Poors.
The Companys adoption of new accounting standards on January 1, 2010 resulted in the consolidation
of the QSPE that was not previously recorded on the Companys Consolidated Statement of Condition.
See Note 2 Recent Accounting Developments and Note 8 Loan Securitization, for more
information on the QSPE.
The subordinated notes represent three notes, issued in October 2002, April 2003 and October 2005
(funded in May 2006). The balances of the notes as of March 31, 2010 were $15.0 million, $20.0
million and $25.0 million, respectively. Each subordinated note requires annual principal payments
of $5.0 million beginning in the sixth year, with final maturities in the tenth year. The Company
may redeem the subordinated notes at any time prior to maturity. Interest on each note is
calculated at a rate equal to LIBOR plus 130 basis points.
(12) Junior Subordinated Debentures
As of March 31, 2010, the Company owned 100% of the common securities of nine trusts, Wintrust
Capital Trust III, Wintrust Statutory Trust IV, Wintrust Statutory Trust V, Wintrust Capital Trust
VII, Wintrust Capital Trust VIII, Wintrust Capital Trust IX, Northview Capital Trust I, Town
Bankshares Capital Trust I, and First Northwest Capital Trust I (the Trusts) set up to provide
long-term financing. The Northview, Town and First Northwest capital trusts were acquired as part
of the acquisitions of Northview Financial Corporation, Town Bankshares, Ltd., and First Northwest
Bancorp, Inc., respectively. The Trusts were formed for purposes of issuing trust preferred
securities to third-party investors and investing the proceeds from the issuance of the trust
preferred securities and common securities solely in junior subordinated debentures issued by the
Company (or assumed by the Company in connection with an acquisition), with the same maturities and
interest rates as the trust preferred securities. The junior subordinated debentures are the sole
assets of the Trusts. In each Trust, the common securities represent approximately 3% of the junior
subordinated debentures and the trust preferred securities represent approximately 97% of the
junior subordinated debentures.
The Trusts are reported in the Companys consolidated financial statements as unconsolidated
subsidiaries. Accordingly, in the Consolidated Statements of Condition, the junior subordinated
debentures issued by the Company to the Trusts are reported as liabilities and the common
securities of the Trusts, all of which are owned by the Company, are included in available-for-sale
securities.
19
The following table provides a summary of the Companys junior subordinated debentures as of
March 31, 2010. The junior subordinated debentures represent the par value of the obligations owed
to the Trusts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earliest |
|
|
|
Trust Preferred |
|
|
Subordinated |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Rate at |
|
|
Issue |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Redemption |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Securities |
|
|
Debentures |
|
|
Structure |
|
|
3/31/10 |
|
|
Date |
|
|
Date |
|
|
Date |
|
Wintrust Capital Trust III |
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
$ |
25,774 |
|
|
|
L+3.25 |
|
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
04/2003 |
|
|
|
04/2033 |
|
|
|
04/2008 |
|
Wintrust Statutory Trust IV |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
20,619 |
|
|
|
L+2.80 |
|
|
|
3.09 |
% |
|
|
12/2003 |
|
|
|
12/2033 |
|
|
|
12/2008 |
|
Wintrust Statutory Trust V |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
41,238 |
|
|
|
L+2.60 |
|
|
|
3.09 |
% |
|
|
05/2004 |
|
|
|
05/2034 |
|
|
|
06/2009 |
|
Wintrust Capital Trust VII |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
51,550 |
|
|
|
L+1.95 |
|
|
|
2.21 |
% |
|
|
12/2004 |
|
|
|
03/2035 |
|
|
|
03/2010 |
|
Wintrust Capital Trust VIII |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
41,238 |
|
|
|
L+1.45 |
|
|
|
1.74 |
% |
|
|
08/2005 |
|
|
|
09/2035 |
|
|
|
09/2010 |
|
Wintrust Capital Trust IX |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
51,547 |
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
6.84 |
% |
|
|
09/2006 |
|
|
|
09/2036 |
|
|
|
09/2011 |
|
Northview Capital Trust I |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
6,186 |
|
|
|
L+3.00 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
08/2003 |
|
|
|
11/2033 |
|
|
|
08/2008 |
|
Town Bankshares Capital Trust I |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
6,186 |
|
|
|
L+3.00 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
08/2003 |
|
|
|
11/2033 |
|
|
|
08/2008 |
|
First Northwest Capital Trust I |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
5,155 |
|
|
|
L+3.00 |
|
|
|
3.29 |
% |
|
|
05/2004 |
|
|
|
05/2034 |
|
|
|
05/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
249,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.51 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The junior subordinated debentures totaled $249.5 million at March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009
and March 31, 2009.
The interest rates on the variable rate junior subordinated debentures are based on the three-month
LIBOR rate and reset on a quarterly basis. The interest rate on the Wintrust Capital Trust IX
junior subordinated debentures, currently fixed at 6.84%, changes to a variable rate equal to
three-month LIBOR plus 1.63% effective September 15, 2011. At March 31, 2010, the weighted average
contractual interest rate on the junior subordinated debentures was 3.51%. The Company entered into
$175 million of interest rate swaps to hedge the variable cash flows on certain junior subordinated
debentures. The hedge-adjusted rate on the junior subordinated debentures on March 31, 2010, was
7.02%. Distributions on the common and preferred securities issued by the Trusts are payable
quarterly at a rate per annum equal to the interest rates being earned by the Trusts on the junior
subordinated debentures. Interest expense on the junior subordinated debentures is deductible for
income tax purposes.
The Company has guaranteed the payment of distributions and payments upon liquidation or redemption
of the trust preferred securities, in each case to the extent of funds held by the Trusts. The
Company and the Trusts believe that, taken together, the obligations of the Company under the
guarantees, the junior subordinated debentures, and other related agreements provide, in the
aggregate, a full, irrevocable and unconditional guarantee, on a subordinated basis, of all of the
obligations of the Trusts under the trust preferred securities. Subject to certain limitations, the
Company has the right to defer the payment of interest on the junior subordinated debentures at any
time, or from time to time, for a period not to exceed 20 consecutive quarters. The trust preferred
securities are subject to mandatory redemption, in whole or in part, upon repayment of the junior
subordinated debentures at maturity or their earlier redemption. The junior subordinated debentures
are redeemable in whole or in part prior to maturity at any time after the earliest redemption
dates shown in the table, and earlier at the discretion of the Company if certain conditions are
met, and, in any event, only after the Company has obtained Federal Reserve approval, if then
required under applicable guidelines or regulations.
The junior subordinated debentures, subject to certain limitations, qualify as Tier 1 capital of
the Company for regulatory purposes. The amount of junior subordinated debentures and certain other
capital elements in excess of those certain limitations could be included in Tier 2 capital,
subject to restrictions. At March 31, 2010, all of the junior subordinated debentures, net of the
Common Securities, were included in the Companys Tier 1 regulatory capital.
(13) Segment Information
The Companys operations consist of three primary segments: community banking, specialty finance
and wealth management.
The three reportable segments are strategic business units that are separately managed as they
offer different products and services and have different marketing strategies. In addition, each
segments customer base has varying characteristics. The community banking segment has a different
regulatory environment than the specialty finance and wealth management segments. While the
Companys management monitors each of the fifteen bank subsidiaries operations and profitability
separately, as well as that of its mortgage company, these subsidiaries have been aggregated into
one reportable operating segment due to the similarities in products and services, customer base,
operations, profitability measures, and economic characteristics.
The net interest income, net revenue and segment profit of the community banking segment includes
income and related interest costs from portfolio loans that were purchased from the specialty
finance segment. For purposes of internal segment profitability analysis,
management reviews the results of its specialty finance segment as if all loans originated and sold
to the community banking segment were retained within that segments operations, thereby causing
inter-segment eliminations. See Note 3 Business Combinations, for more information on the life
insurance premium finance loan acquisition in the third and fourth quarters of 2009. Similarly, for
purposes of analyzing the contribution from the wealth management segment, management allocates a
portion of the net interest
20
income earned by the community banking segment on deposit balances of
customers of the wealth management segment to the wealth management segment. See Note 10
Deposits, for more information on these deposits.
The segment financial information provided in the following tables has been derived from the
internal profitability reporting system used by management to monitor and manage the financial
performance of the Company. The accounting policies of the segments are generally the same as those
described in the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in Note 1. The Company evaluates
segment performance based on after-tax profit or loss and other appropriate profitability measures
common to each segment. Certain indirect expenses have been allocated based on actual volume
measurements and other criteria, as appropriate. Intersegment revenue and transfers are generally
accounted for at current market prices. The parent and intersegment eliminations reflect parent
company information and intersegment eliminations. In the first quarter of 2009, the Company
combined the premium finance and Tricom segments into the specialty finance segment. Additionally,
during the fourth quarter of 2009, the contribution attributable to the wealth management deposits
was redefined to measure the value as an alternative source of funding for each bank. In previous
periods, the contribution from these deposits was measured as the full net interest
income
contribution. The redefined measure better reflects the value of these deposits to the Company.
Prior period information has been restated to reflect these changes.
The following is a summary of certain operating information for reportable segments (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March
31, |
|
|
$ Change in |
|
|
% Change in |
|
(Dollars
in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Contribution |
|
|
Contribution |
|
Net interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community banking
|
|
$ |
88,024 |
|
|
$ |
61,870 |
|
|
$ |
26,154 |
|
|
|
42 |
% |
Specialty finance
|
|
|
14,332 |
|
|
|
19,015 |
|
|
|
(4,683 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
Wealth management
|
|
|
2,542 |
|
|
|
3,209 |
|
|
|
(667 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
Parent and inter-segment
eliminations
|
|
|
(9,033 |
) |
|
|
(19,312 |
) |
|
|
10,279 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net interest
income
|
|
$ |
95,865 |
|
|
$ |
64,782 |
|
|
$ |
31,083 |
|
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community banking
|
|
$ |
15,196 |
|
|
$ |
23,476 |
|
|
$ |
(8,280 |
) |
|
|
(35) |
% |
Specialty finance
|
|
|
11,476 |
|
|
|
804 |
|
|
|
10,672 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
Wealth management
|
|
|
10,688 |
|
|
|
8,004 |
|
|
|
2,684 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Parent and inter-segment
eliminations
|
|
|
5,247 |
|
|
|
4,143 |
|
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest
income
|
|
$ |
42,607 |
|
|
$ |
36,427 |
|
|
$ |
6,180 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenue (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community banking
|
|
$ |
103,220 |
|
|
$ |
85,346 |
|
|
$ |
17,874 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
Specialty finance
|
|
|
25,808 |
|
|
|
19,819 |
|
|
|
5,989 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Wealth management
|
|
|
13,230 |
|
|
|
11,213 |
|
|
|
2,017 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Parent and inter-segment
eliminations
|
|
|
(3,786 |
) |
|
|
(15,169 |
) |
|
|
11,383 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue
|
|
$ |
138,472 |
|
|
$ |
101,209 |
|
|
$ |
37,263 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community banking
|
|
$ |
6,023 |
|
|
$ |
5,878 |
|
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Specialty finance
|
|
|
9,040 |
|
|
|
8,205 |
|
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Wealth management
|
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
|
1,119 |
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Parent and inter-segment
eliminations
|
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
(8,844 |
) |
|
|
8,741 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment profit
(loss)
|
|
$ |
16,017 |
|
|
$ |
6,358 |
|
|
$ |
9,659 |
|
|
|
152 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community banking
|
|
$ |
11,988,492 |
|
|
$ |
10,703,998 |
|
|
$ |
1,284,494 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Specialty finance
|
|
|
2,706,975 |
|
|
|
1,493,495 |
|
|
|
1,213,480 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
Wealth management
|
|
|
61,917 |
|
|
|
52,867 |
|
|
|
9,050 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Parent and inter-segment
eliminations
|
|
|
(1,917,406 |
) |
|
|
(1,431,419 |
) |
|
|
(485,987 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets
|
|
$ |
12,839,978 |
|
|
$ |
10,818,941 |
|
|
$ |
2,021,037 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M = Not Meaningful
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
(14) Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company enters into derivative financial instruments as part of its strategy to manage its
exposure to changes in interest rates. Derivative instruments represent contracts between parties
that result in one party delivering cash to the other party based on a notional amount and an
underlying (such as a rate, security price or price index) as specified in the contract. The amount
of cash delivered from one party to the other is determined based on the interaction of the
notional amount of the contract with the underlying. Derivatives are also implicit in certain
contracts and commitments.
The derivative financial instruments currently used by the Company to manage its exposure to
interest rate risk include: (1) interest rate swaps to manage the interest rate risk of certain
variable rate liabilities; (2) interest rate lock commitments provided to customers to fund certain
mortgage loans to be sold into the secondary market; (3) forward commitments for the future
delivery of such mortgage loans to protect the Company from adverse changes in interest rates and
corresponding changes in the value of mortgage loans available-for-sale; and (4) covered call
options related to specific investment securities to enhance the overall yield on such securities.
The Company also enters into derivatives (typically interest rate swaps) with certain qualified
borrowers to facilitate the borrowers risk management strategies and concurrently enters into
mirror-image derivatives with a third party counterparty, effectively making a market in the
derivatives for such borrowers.
As required by ASC 815, the Company recognizes derivative financial instruments in the consolidated
financial statements at fair value regardless of the purpose or intent for holding the instrument.
Derivative financial instruments are included in other assets or other liabilities, as appropriate,
on the Consolidated Statements of Condition. Changes in the fair value of derivative financial
instruments are either recognized periodically in income or in shareholders equity as a component
of other comprehensive income depending on whether the derivative financial instrument qualifies
for hedge accounting and, if so, whether it qualifies as a fair value hedge or cash flow hedge.
Generally, changes in fair values of derivatives accounted for as fair value hedges are recorded in
income in the same period and in the same income statement line as changes in the fair values of
the hedged items that relate to the hedged risk(s). Changes in fair values of derivative financial
instruments accounted for as cash flow hedges, to the extent they are effective hedges, are
recorded as a component of other comprehensive income, net of deferred taxes, and reclassified to
earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings. Changes in fair values of derivative
financial instruments not designated in a hedging relationship pursuant to ASC 815, including
changes in fair value related to the ineffective portion of cash flow hedges, are reported in
non-interest income during the period of the change. Derivative financial instruments are valued by
a third party and are periodically validated by comparison with valuations provided by the
respective counterparties. Fair values of mortgage banking derivatives (interest rate lock
commitments and forward commitments to sell mortgage loans) are estimated based on changes in
mortgage interest rates from the date of the loan commitment.
22
The table below presents the fair value of the Companys derivative financial instruments as well
as their classification on the Consolidated Statements of Condition as of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Assets |
|
|
Derivative Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Location |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Location |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
designated as hedging
instruments under ASC
815: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
designated as Cash Flow
Hedges |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
15,080 |
|
|
$ |
14,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not
designated as hedging
instruments underASC
815: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate derivatives |
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
8,769 |
|
|
$ |
7,759 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
9,162 |
|
|
$ |
8,076 |
|
Interest rate lock
commitments |
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
1,210 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
3,002 |
|
Forward commitments to
sell mortgage loans |
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
$ |
4,860 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
1,336 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not
designated as hedging
instruments under ASC
815 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,065 |
|
|
$ |
12,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,575 |
|
|
$ |
11,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,065 |
|
|
$ |
12,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,655 |
|
|
$ |
25,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
The Companys objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest income
and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish these objectives, the Company
primarily uses interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest
rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a
counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements
without the exchange of the underlying notional amount. As of March 31, 2010, the Company had five
interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $175.0 million that were designated as
cash flow hedges of interest rate risk.
The table below provides details on each of these five interest rate swaps as of March 31, 2010
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Receive Rate |
|
|
Pay Rate |
|
|
Type of Hedging |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Amount |
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|
(LIBOR) |
|
|
(Fixed) |
|
|
Relationship |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay Fixed, Receive Variable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 2011 |
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
(1,335 |
) |
|
|
0.29 |
% |
|
|
5.25 |
% |
|
Cash Flow |
September 2011 |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
(2,670 |
) |
|
|
0.29 |
% |
|
|
5.25 |
% |
|
Cash Flow |
October 2011 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
(982 |
) |
|
|
0.25 |
% |
|
|
3.39 |
% |
|
Cash Flow |
September 2013 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
(5,598 |
) |
|
|
0.26 |
% |
|
|
5.30 |
% |
|
Cash Flow |
September 2013 |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
(4,495 |
) |
|
|
0.29 |
% |
|
|
5.30 |
% |
|
Cash Flow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
|
$ |
(15,080 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since entering into these interest rate swaps, they have been used to hedge the variable cash
outflows associated with interest expense on the Companys junior subordinated debentures. The
effective portion of changes in the fair value of these cash flow hedges is
23
recorded in accumulated
other comprehensive income and is subsequently reclassified to interest expense as interest
payments are made on the Companys variable rate junior subordinated debentures. The changes in
fair value (net of tax) are separately disclosed in the statement of changes in shareholders
equity as a component of comprehensive income. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value
of these derivatives is recognized directly in earnings; however, no hedge ineffectiveness was
recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2010 or March 31, 2009. The Company uses the
hypothetical derivative method to assess and measure effectiveness.
A rollforward of the amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income related to interest rate
swaps designated as cash flow hedges follows (dollars in thousands) :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Unrealized loss at beginning of period |
|
$ |
(15,487 |
) |
|
$ |
(20,547 |
) |
Amount reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income to interest expense
on junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
2,194 |
|
|
|
1,603 |
|
Amount of (loss) gain recognized in other
comprehensive income |
|
|
(2,461 |
) |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss at end of period |
|
$ |
(15,754 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,796 |
) |
|
|
|
In September 2008, the Company terminated an interest rate swap with a notional amount of
$25.0 million (maturing in October 2011) that was designated in a cash flow hedge and entered into
a new interest rate swap with another counterparty to effectively replace the terminated swap. The
interest rate swap was terminated by the Company in accordance with the default provisions in the
swap agreement. The unrealized loss on the interest rate swap at the date of termination is being
amortized out of other comprehensive income to interest expense over the remaining term of the
terminated swap. At March 31, 2010 accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) includes $674,000
of unrealized loss ($414,000 net of tax) related to this terminated interest rate swap.
As of March 31, 2010, the Company estimates that during the next twelve months, $7.5 million will
be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income as an increase to interest expense.
Non-Designated Hedges
The Company does not use derivatives for speculative purposes. Derivatives not designated as hedges
are used to manage the Companys exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks but
do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements of ASC 815. Changes in the fair value of
derivatives not designated in hedging relationships are recorded directly in earnings.
Interest Rate Derivatives The Company has interest rate derivatives, including swaps and option
products, resulting from a service the Company provides to certain qualified borrowers. The
Companys banking subsidiaries execute certain derivative products (typically interest rate swaps)
directly with qualified commercial borrowers to facilitate their respective risk management
strategies. For example, doing so allows the Companys commercial borrowers to effectively convert
a variable rate loan to a fixed rate. In order to minimize the Companys exposure on these
transactions, the Company simultaneously executes offsetting derivatives with third parties. In
most cases the offsetting derivatives have mirror-image terms, which result in the positions
changes in fair value substantially offsetting through earnings each period. However, to the extent
that the derivatives are not a mirror-image and because of differences in counterparty credit risk,
changes in fair value will not completely offset resulting in some earnings impact each period.
Changes in the fair value of these derivatives are included in other non-interest income. At March
31, 2010, the Company had approximately 94 derivative transactions (47 with customers and 47 with
third parties) with an aggregate notional amount of approximately $375.5 million ($370.6 million of
interest rate swaps and $4.9 million of interest rate options) related to this program. These
interest rate derivatives had maturity dates ranging from August 2010 to March 2019.
Mortgage Banking Derivatives These derivatives include interest rate lock commitments provided
to customers to fund certain mortgage loans to be sold into the secondary market and forward
commitments for the future delivery of such loans. It is the Companys practice to enter into
forward commitments for the future delivery of residential mortgage loans when interest rate lock
commitments are entered into in order to economically hedge the effect of future changes in
interest rates on its commitments to fund the loans as well as on its portfolio of mortgage loans
held-for-sale. The Companys mortgage banking derivatives have not been designated as being in
hedge relationships. At March 31, 2010 the Company had interest rate lock commitments with an
aggregate notional amount of approximately $343 million and forward commitments to sell mortgage loans with an
aggregate notional amount of approximately $463 million. The fair values of these derivatives were estimated
based on changes in mortgage rates from the dates of the commitments.
Changes in the fair value of these mortgage banking derivatives are included in mortgage banking
revenue.
24
Other Derivatives Periodically, the Company will sell options to a bank or dealer for the
right to purchase certain securities held within the Banks investment portfolios (covered call
options). These option transactions are designed primarily to increase the total return associated
with the investment securities portfolio. These options do not qualify as hedges pursuant to ASC
815, and, accordingly, changes in fair value of these contracts are recognized as other
non-interest income. There were no covered call options outstanding as of March 31, 2010, December
31, 2009 or March 31, 2009.
Amounts included in the consolidated statement of income related to derivative instruments not
designated in hedge relationships were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
Derivative |
|
Location in income statement |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Interest rate
swaps and floors |
|
Other income |
|
$ |
(76 |
) |
|
$ |
724 |
|
Mortgage banking
derivatives |
|
Mortgage banking revenue |
|
|
(2,144 |
) |
|
|
(708 |
) |
Covered call options |
|
Other income |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Risk
Derivative instruments have inherent risks, primarily market risk and credit risk. Market risk is
associated with changes in interest rates and credit risk relates to the risk that the counterparty
will fail to perform according to the terms of the agreement. The amounts potentially subject to
market and credit risks are the streams of interest payments under the contracts and the market
value of the derivative instrument and not the notional principal amounts used to express the
volume of the transactions. Market and credit risks are managed and monitored as part of the
Companys overall asset-liability management process, except that the credit risk related to
derivatives entered into with certain qualified borrowers is managed through the Companys standard
loan underwriting process since these derivatives are secured through collateral provided by the
loan agreements. Actual exposures are monitored against various types of credit limits established
to contain risk within parameters. When deemed necessary, appropriate types and amounts of
collateral are obtained to minimize credit exposure.
The Company has agreements with certain of its interest rate derivative counterparties that contain
cross-default provisions, which provide that if the Company defaults on any of its indebtedness,
including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then
the Company could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations. The Company also has
agreements with certain of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision allowing the
counter party to terminate the derivative positions if the Company fails to maintain its status as
a well / adequate capitalized institution, which would require the Company to settle its
obligations under the agreements. As of March 31, 2010, the fair value of interest rate derivatives
in a net liability position, which includes accrued interest related to these agreements, was $25.0
million. As of March 31, 2010 the Company has minimum collateral posting thresholds with certain of
its derivative counterparties and has posted collateral consisting of $8.1 million of cash and $9.4
million of securities. If the Company had breached any of these provisions at March 31, 2010 it
would have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at the termination value
and would have been required to pay any additional amounts due in excess of amounts previously
posted as collateral with the respective counterparty.
The Company is also exposed to the credit risk of its commercial borrowers who are counterparties
to interest rate derivatives with the Banks. This counterparty risk related to the commercial
borrowers is managed and monitored through the Banks standard underwriting process applicable to
loans since these derivatives are secured through collateral provided by the loan agreement. The
counterparty risk associated with the mirror-image swaps executed with third parties is monitored
and managed in connection with the Companys overall asset liability management process.
25
(15) Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities
Effective January 1, 2008, upon adoption of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurement, which is now
part of ASC 820, the Company began to group financial assets and financial liabilities measured at
fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and
the observability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:
|
|
|
Level 1 unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for
the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for
similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar
assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices
that are observable for the asset or liability or inputs that are derived principally
from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 significant unobservable inputs that reflect the Companys own assumptions
that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets
and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing
models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments
for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or
estimation. |
A financial instruments categorization within the above valuation hierarchy is based upon the
lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Companys assessment
of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires
judgment, and considers factors specific to the assets or liabilities. Following is a description
of the valuation methodologies used for the Companys assets and liabilities measured at fair value
on a recurring basis.
Available-for-sale and trading account securities Fair values for available-for-sale and trading
account securities are based on quoted market prices when available or through the use of
alternative approaches, such as matrix or model pricing or indicators from market makers.
Mortgage loans held-for-sale Mortgage loans originated by Wintrust Mortgage Company on or after
January 1, 2008 are carried at fair value. The fair value of mortgage loans held-for-sale is
determined by reference to investor price sheets for loan products with similar characteristics.
Mortgage servicing rights Fair value for mortgage servicing rights is determined utilizing a
third party valuation model which stratifies the servicing rights into pools based on product type
and interest rate. The fair value of each servicing rights pool is calculated based on the present
value of estimated future cash flows using a discount rate commensurate with the risk associated
with that pool, given current market conditions. Estimates of fair value include assumptions about
prepayment speeds, interest rates and other factors which are subject to change over time.
Derivative instruments The Companys derivative instruments include interest rate swaps,
commitments to fund mortgages for sale into the secondary market (interest rate locks) and forward
commitments to end investors for the sale of mortgage loans. Interest rate swaps are valued by a
third party, using models that primarily use market observable inputs, such as yield curves, and
are validated by comparison with valuations provided by the respective counterparties. The fair
value for mortgage derivatives is based on changes in mortgage rates from the date of the
commitments.
Nonqualified deferred compensation assets The underlying assets relating to the nonqualified
deferred compensation plan are included in a trust and primarily consist of non-exchange traded
institutional funds which are priced based by an independent third party service.
Retained interests from the sale of premium finance receivables The fair value of retained
interests, which include servicing rights and interest only strips, from the sale of premium
finance receivables are based on certain observable inputs such as interest rates and credits
spreads, as well as unobservable inputs such as prepayments, late payments and estimated net
charge-offs.
26
The following tables present the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring basis for the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
110,877 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
110,877 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
U.S. Government agencies |
|
|
558,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
558,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal |
|
|
61,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,289 |
|
|
|
15,134 |
|
Corporate notes and other |
|
|
79,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,850 |
|
|
|
11,582 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
360,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205,964 |
|
|
|
154,469 |
|
Equity securities (1) |
|
|
27,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,027 |
|
|
|
26,800 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
39,938 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
1,832 |
|
|
|
37,895 |
|
Mortgage loans held-for-sale |
|
|
149,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
6,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,602 |
|
Nonqualified deferred compensation assets |
|
|
2,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
10,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,407,460 |
|
|
$ |
211 |
|
|
$ |
1,154,767 |
|
|
$ |
252,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
$ |
25,655 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,655 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
120,287 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
120,287 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
U.S. Government agencies |
|
|
604,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604,227 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
Municipal |
|
|
67,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,996 |
|
|
|
17,097 |
|
Corporate notes and other |
|
|
72,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,772 |
|
|
|
4,373 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
437,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261,786 |
|
|
|
175,475 |
|
Equity securities (1) |
|
|
33,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,493 |
|
|
|
25,873 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
13,815 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
|
12,218 |
|
Mortgage loans held-for-sale |
|
|
207,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
4,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,163 |
|
Nonqualified deferred compensation assets |
|
|
2,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
11,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
Retained interests from the sale of
premium finance receivables |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,573,670 |
|
|
$ |
204 |
|
|
$ |
1,333,858 |
|
|
$ |
239,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
$ |
29,963 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
29,963 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes Federal Reserve and FHLB stock and the common
securities issued by trusts formed by the Company in
conjunction with Trust Preferred Securities offerings. |
The aggregate remaining contractual principal balance outstanding as of March 31, 2010 and 2009 for
mortgage loans held-for-sale measured at fair value under ASC 825 was $145.8 million and $202.1
million, respectively, while the aggregate fair value of mortgage loans held-for-sale was $149.9
million and $207.1 million, respectively, as shown in the above tables. There were no nonaccrual
loans or loans past due greater than 90 days and still accruing in the mortgage loans held-for-sale
portfolio measured at fair value as of March 31, 2010 and 2009.
27
The changes in Level 3 available-for-sale securities measured at fair value on a recurring basis
during the three months ended March 31, 2010 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Govt. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
notes and |
|
|
Mortgage- |
|
|
Equity |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
agencies |
|
|
Municipal |
|
|
other debt |
|
|
backed |
|
|
securities |
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,152 |
|
|
$ |
51,194 |
|
|
$ |
158,449 |
|
|
$ |
26,800 |
|
Total net gains (losses) included in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,027 |
|
|
(3,980 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchases, issuances, sales and
settlements, net |
|
|
|
|
|
(2,018 |
) |
|
(40,644 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net transfers into/(out) of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15,134 |
|
|
$ |
11,582 |
|
|
$ |
154,469 |
|
|
$ |
26,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Income for Municipal and Corporate notes and other is recognized as a component of interest income on securities. |
The changes in Level 3 for assets and liabilities not included in the preceding table measured at
fair value on a recurring basis during the three months ended March 31, 2010 are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
account |
|
|
servicing |
|
|
Retained |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
securities |
|
|
rights |
|
|
Interests |
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
31,924 |
|
|
$ |
6,745 |
|
|
$ |
43,541 |
|
Total net gains (losses) included in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (1) |
|
5,971 |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, issuances sales, and settlements, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,541 |
) |
Net transfers into/(out) of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
37,895 |
|
|
$ |
6,602 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Income for trading account securities is recognized as
a component of trading income in non-interest income
and changes in the balance of mortgage servicing rights
are recorded as a component of mortgage banking revenue
in non-interest income. Income for retained interests
is recorded as a component of gain on sales of premium
finance receivables or miscellaneous income in
non-interest income. |
The changes in Level 3 for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis
during the three months ended March 31, 2009 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Govt. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
notes and |
|
|
Mortgage- |
|
|
Equity |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
agencies |
|
|
Municipal |
|
|
other debt |
|
|
backed |
|
|
securities |
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
$ |
9,373 |
|
|
$ |
1,395 |
|
|
$ |
4,010 |
|
|
$ |
26,104 |
|
Total net gains (losses) included in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,313 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchases, issuances, sales and
settlements, net |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
7,724 |
|
|
2,978 |
|
|
172,778 |
|
|
37 |
|
Net transfers into/(out) of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(268 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
108 |
|
|
$ |
17,097 |
|
|
$ |
4,373 |
|
|
$ |
175,475 |
|
|
$ |
25,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Income for Municipal and Corporate notes and other is recognized as a component of interest income on securities. |
28
The changes in Level 3 for assets and liabilities not included in the preceding table measured at
fair value on a recurring basis during the three months ended March 31, 2009 are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
account |
|
|
servicing |
|
|
Retained |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
securities |
|
|
rights |
|
|
Interests |
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
3,075 |
|
|
$ |
3,990 |
|
|
$ |
1,229 |
|
Total net gains (losses) included in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (1) |
|
|
8,675 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, issuances, sales and settlements, net |
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(928 |
) |
Net transfers into/(out) of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
12,218 |
|
|
$ |
4,163 |
|
|
$ |
301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Income for trading account securities is recognized as
a component of trading income in non-interest income
and changes in the balance of mortgage servicing rights
are recorded as a component of mortgage banking revenue
in non-interest income. Income for retained interests
is recorded as a component of gain on sales of premium
finance receivables or miscellaneous income in
non-interest income. |
Also, the Company may be required, from time to time, to measure certain other financial assets at
fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. These adjustments to fair value usually
result from application of lower of cost or market accounting or impairment charges of individual
assets. For assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis that were still held in the
balance sheet at the end of the period, the following table provides the carrying value of the
related individual assets or portfolios at March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Losses |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Recognized |
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
85,928 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
85,928 |
|
|
$ |
13,382 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
89,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,009 |
|
|
|
7,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
174,937 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
174,937 |
|
|
$ |
20,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans A loan is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and
events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due pursuant to the
contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impairment is measured by estimating the fair value of the
loan based on the present value of expected cash flows, the market price of the loan, or the fair
value of the underlying collateral. Impaired loans are considered a fair value measurement where an
allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral. Appraised values, which may require
adjustments to market-based valuation inputs, are generally used on real estate
collateral-dependant impaired loans.
Other real estate owned Other real estate owned is comprised of real estate acquired in partial
or full satisfaction of loans and is included in other assets. Other real estate owned is recorded
at its estimated fair value less estimated selling costs at the date of transfer, with any excess
of the related loan balance over the fair value less expected selling costs charged to the
allowance for loan losses. Subsequent changes in value are reported as adjustments to the carrying
amount and are recorded in other non-interest expense. Gains and losses upon sale, if any, are also
charged to other non-interest expense. Fair value is generally based on third party appraisals and
internal estimates and is therefore considered a Level 3 valuation.
29
The Company is required under applicable accounting guidance to report the fair value of all
financial instruments on the consolidated statement of condition, including those financial
instruments carried at cost. The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Companys
financial instruments at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010 |
|
At December 31, 2009 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
121,894 |
|
|
|
121,894 |
|
|
|
158,616 |
|
|
|
158,616 |
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks |
|
|
1,222,323 |
|
|
|
1,222,323 |
|
|
|
1,025,663 |
|
|
|
1,025,663 |
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
1,279,920 |
|
|
|
1,279,920 |
|
|
|
1,328,815 |
|
|
|
1,328,815 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
39,938 |
|
|
|
39,938 |
|
|
|
33,774 |
|
|
|
33,774 |
|
Brokerage customer receivables |
|
|
20,978 |
|
|
|
20,978 |
|
|
|
20,871 |
|
|
|
20,871 |
|
Mortgage loans held-for-sale, at
fair value |
|
|
149,897 |
|
|
|
149,897 |
|
|
|
265,786 |
|
|
|
265,786 |
|
Loans held-for-sale, at lower of
cost or market |
|
|
6,152 |
|
|
|
6,602 |
|
|
|
9,929 |
|
|
|
10,033 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
9,070,562 |
|
|
|
9,224,223 |
|
|
|
8,411,771 |
|
|
|
8,403,305 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
6,602 |
|
|
|
6,602 |
|
|
|
6,745 |
|
|
|
6,745 |
|
Nonqualified deferred compensation
assets |
|
|
2,828 |
|
|
|
2,828 |
|
|
|
2,827 |
|
|
|
2,827 |
|
Retained interests from the
sale/securitization of premium
finance receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,541 |
|
|
|
43,541 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
10,065 |
|
|
|
10,065 |
|
|
|
12,651 |
|
|
|
12,651 |
|
Accrued interest receivable and other |
|
|
132,179 |
|
|
|
132,179 |
|
|
|
129,774 |
|
|
|
129,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial assets |
|
$ |
12,063,338 |
|
|
|
12,217,067 |
|
|
|
11,450,763 |
|
|
|
11,442,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-maturity deposits |
|
$ |
5,157,206 |
|
|
|
5,157,206 |
|
|
|
5,347,823 |
|
|
|
5,347,823 |
|
Deposits with stated maturities |
|
|
4,567,664 |
|
|
|
4,614,575 |
|
|
|
4,569,251 |
|
|
|
4,616,658 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
421,775 |
|
|
|
441,189 |
|
|
|
430,987 |
|
|
|
446,663 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
218,079 |
|
|
|
218,079 |
|
|
|
247,437 |
|
|
|
247,347 |
|
Secured borrowings owed to
securitization investors |
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
249,493 |
|
|
|
245,778 |
|
|
|
249,493 |
|
|
|
245,990 |
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
|
25,655 |
|
|
|
25,655 |
|
|
|
25,816 |
|
|
|
25,816 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
17,380 |
|
|
|
17,380 |
|
|
|
15,669 |
|
|
|
15,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial liabilities |
|
$ |
11,318,252 |
|
|
|
11,380,862 |
|
|
|
10,947,476 |
|
|
|
11,006,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating fair values of
financial instruments that were not previously disclosed.
Cash and cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents include cash and demand balances from banks,
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements. The carrying value of cash and
cash equivalents approximates fair value due to the short maturity of those instruments.
Interest bearing deposits with banks. The carrying value of interest bearing deposits with banks
approximates fair value due to the short maturity of those instruments.
Brokerage customer receivables. The carrying value of brokerage customer receivables approximates
fair value due to the relatively short period of time to repricing of variable interest rates.
Loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or market. Fair value is based on either quoted prices for
the same or similar loans, or values obtained from third parties, or is estimated for portfolios of
loans with similar financial characteristics.
30
Loans. Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics.
Loans are analyzed by type such as commercial, residential real estate, etc. Each category is
further segmented by interest rate type (fixed and variable) and term. For variable-rate loans that
reprice frequently, estimated fair values are based on carrying values. The fair value of
residential loans is based on secondary market sources for securities backed by similar loans,
adjusted for differences in loan characteristics. The fair value for other fixed rate loans is
estimated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the estimated maturity using estimated market
discount rates that reflect credit and interest rate risks inherent in the loan. The primary impact
of credit risk on the present value of the loan portfolio, however, was accommodated through the
use of the allowance for loan losses, which is believed to represent the current fair value of
probable incurred losses for purposes of the fair value calculation.
Accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable. The carrying values of accrued interest
receivable and accrued interest payable approximate market values due to the relatively short
period of time to expected realization.
Deposit liabilities. The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as non-interest
bearing deposits, savings, NOW accounts and money market accounts, is equal to the amount payable
on demand as of period-end (i.e. the carrying value). The fair value of certificates of deposit is
based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the
rates currently in effect for deposits of similar remaining maturities.
Notes payable. The carrying value of notes payable approximates fair value due to the relatively
short period of time to repricing of variable interest rates.
Federal Home Loan Bank advances. The fair value of Federal Home Loan Bank advances is obtained from
the Federal Home Loan Bank which uses a discounted cash flow analysis based on current market rates
of similar maturity debt securities to discount cash flows.
Subordinated notes. The carrying value of the subordinated notes payable approximates fair value
due to the relatively short period of time to repricing of variable interest rates.
Other borrowings. Carrying value of other borrowings approximates fair value due to the relatively
short period of time to maturity or repricing.
Junior subordinated debentures. The fair value of the junior subordinated debentures is based on
the discounted value of contractual cash flows.
(16) Stock-Based Compensation Plans
The 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2007 Plan), which was approved by the Companys shareholders
in January 2007, permits the grant of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, rights
and restricted share awards, as well as the conversion of outstanding options of acquired companies
to Wintrust options. The 2007 Plan initially provided for the issuance of up to 500,000 shares of
common stock, and in May 2009 the Companys shareholders approved an additional 325,000 shares of
common stock that may be offered under the 2007 Plan. All grants made after 2006 were made pursuant
to the 2007 Plan, and as of March 31, 2010, 204,276 shares were available for future grant. The
2007 Plan replaced the Wintrust Financial Corporation 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the 1997 Plan)
which had substantially similar terms. The 2007 Plan and the 1997 Plan are collectively referred to
as the Plans. The Plans cover substantially all employees of Wintrust.
The Company typically awards stock-based compensation in the form of stock options and restricted
share awards. Stock options typically provide the holder of the option to purchase shares of
Wintrusts common stock at the fair market value of the stock on the date the options are granted.
Options generally vest ratably over a five-year period and expire at such time as the Compensation
Committee determines at the time of grant. The 2007 Plan provides for a maximum term of seven years
from the date of grant while the 1997 Plan provided for a maximum term of ten years. Restricted
share awards entitle the holders to receive, at no cost, shares of the Companys common stock.
Restricted share awards generally vest over periods of one to five years from the date of grant.
Holders of the restricted share awards are not entitled to vote or receive cash dividends (or cash
payments equal to the cash dividends) on the underlying common shares until the awards are vested.
Except in limited circumstances, these awards are canceled upon termination of employment without
any payment of consideration by the Company.
Stock-based compensation cost is measured as the fair value of an award on the date of grant and is
recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. The fair value of restricted share
awards is determined based on the average of the high and low trading prices on the grant date. The
fair value of stock options is estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing
model that utilizes the assumptions outlined in the following table. Option-pricing models require
the input of highly subjective assumptions and are sensitive to changes in the options expected
life and the price volatility of the underlying stock, which can materially affect the fair value
estimate. Expected life is based on historical exercise and termination behavior as well as the
term of the option, and expected stock price volatility is based on historical volatility of the
Companys common stock, which correlates with the expected term of the options. The risk-free
interest rate is based on comparable U.S. Treasury rates. Management reviews and adjusts the
assumptions used to calculate the fair value of an option on a periodic basis to better reflect
expected trends.
31
The following table presents the weighted average assumptions used to determine the fair value of
options granted in the three months ending March 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
March 31, 2009 |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
48.3 |
% |
|
|
41.5 |
% |
Risk-free rate |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
Expected option life (in years) |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Stock based compensation is recognized based upon the number of awards that are ultimately expected
to vest. As a result, compensation expense recognized for stock options and restricted share awards
was reduced for estimated forfeitures prior to vesting. Forfeiture rates are estimated for each
type of award based on historical forfeiture experience. Estimated forfeitures will be reassessed
in subsequent periods and may change based on new facts and circumstances.
Compensation cost charged to income for stock options was $577,000 and $891,000 in the first
quarters of 2010 and 2009, respectively. Compensation cost charged to income for restricted share
awards was $723,000 and $882,000 in the first quarters of 2010 and 2009, respectively.
A summary of stock option activity under the Plans for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
March 31, 2009 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Remaining |
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
Common |
|
Average |
|
Contractual |
|
Value (2) |
Stock Options |
|
Shares |
|
Strike Price |
|
Term (1) |
|
($000) |
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2010 |
|
|
2,156,209 |
|
|
$ |
37.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
48,865 |
|
|
|
34.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(78,124 |
) |
|
|
14.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or canceled |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
12.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
2,126,865 |
|
|
$ |
38.41 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
$ |
13,138 |
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
1,832,299 |
|
|
$ |
38.56 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
$ |
11,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2009 |
|
|
2,388,174 |
|
|
$ |
35.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
13.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(46,591 |
) |
|
|
11.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or canceled |
|
|
(2,747 |
) |
|
|
12.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
2,352,836 |
|
|
$ |
35.97 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,942,205 |
|
|
$ |
34.03 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the weighted average contractual life remaining in years. |
|
(2) |
|
Aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic
value (i.e., the difference between the Companys average of the
high and low stock price on the last trading day of the quarter and
the option exercise price, multiplied by the number of shares) that
would have been received by the option holders if they had
exercised their options on the last day of the quarter. This amount
will change based on the fair market value of the Companys stock. |
The weighted average grant date fair value per share of options granted during the three months
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was $16.34 and $4.44, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of
options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, was $1.6 million and
$176,000, respectively.
32
A summary of restricted share award activity under the Plans for the three months ended March 31,
2010 and March 31, 2009 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Common |
|
Grant-Date |
|
Common |
|
Grant-Date |
Restricted Shares |
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value |
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value |
|
Outstanding at January 1 |
|
|
208,430 |
|
|
$ |
43.24 |
|
|
|
262,997 |
|
|
$ |
44.09 |
|
Granted |
|
|
101,806 |
|
|
|
35.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and issued |
|
|
(31,175 |
) |
|
|
51.94 |
|
|
|
(59,635 |
) |
|
|
41.39 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(298 |
) |
|
|
37.15 |
|
|
Outstanding at March 31 |
|
|
279,061 |
|
|
$ |
39.36 |
|
|
|
203,064 |
|
|
$ |
45.00 |
|
|
Vested, but not issuable at March 31 |
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
$ |
51.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
In the third quarter of 2009, the Company began paying a portion of the base pay of certain
executives in the Companys stock. Shares issued under this arrangement are granted under the Plan.
In the first quarter of 2010, 1,281 shares were granted under this arrangement at an average stock
price of $34.15 per share. The number of shares granted as of each payroll date is based on the
average of the high and low price of Wintrusts common stock on such date.
As of March 31, 2010, there was $8.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
non-vested share based arrangements under the Plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted average period of approximately two years.
The Company issues new shares to satisfy option exercises, vesting of restricted shares and
issuance of base pay salary shares.
(17) Shareholders Equity and Earnings Per Share
Common Stock Offering
In March 2010, the Company issued through a public offering a total of 6,670,000 shares of its
common stock at $33.25 per share , including 870,000 shares issued at $33.25 per share pursuant to
an over-allotment option granted to the underwriters of the offering. Net proceeds to the Company
totaled $210.5 million.
Series A Preferred Stock
In August 2008, the Company issued and sold 50,000 shares of non-cumulative perpetual convertible
preferred stock, Series A, liquidation preference $1,000 per share (the Series A Preferred Stock)
for $50 million in a private transaction. If declared, dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock
are payable quarterly in arrears at a rate of 8.00% per annum. The Series A Preferred Stock is
convertible into common stock at the option of the holder at a conversion rate of 38.88 shares of
common stock per share of Series A Preferred Stock. On and after August 26, 2010, the Series A
Preferred Stock will be subject to mandatory conversion into common stock in connection with a
fundamental transaction, or on and after August 26, 2013 if the closing price of the Companys
common stock exceeds a certain amount.
Series B Preferred Stock
Pursuant to the U.S. Department of the Treasurys (the U.S. Treasury) Capital Purchase Program,
on December 19, 2008, the Company issued to the U.S. Treasury, in exchange for aggregate
consideration of $250 million, (i) 250,000 shares of the Companys fixed rate cumulative perpetual
preferred Stock, Series B, liquidation preference $1,000 per share (the Series B Preferred
Stock), and (ii) a warrant to purchase 1,643,295 shares of Wintrust common stock at a per share
exercise price of $22.82 and with a term of 10 years. The Series B Preferred Stock will pay a
cumulative dividend at a coupon rate of 5% for the first five years and 9% thereafter. The Series B
Preferred Stock can, with the approval of the Federal Reserve, be redeemed.
The relative fair values of the preferred stock and the warrant issued to the U.S. Treasury in
conjunction with the Companys participation in the Capital Purchase Program were determined
through an analysis, as of the valuation date of December 19, 2008, of the fair value of the
warrants and the fair value of the preferred stock, and an allocation of the relative fair value of
each to the $250 million of total proceeds.
33
The fair value of the warrant was determined using a binomial lattice valuation model. The
assumptions used in arriving at the fair value of the warrant using that valuation method, derived
as of the valuation date, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Company stock price as of the valuation date |
|
$ |
20.06 |
|
Contractual strike price of warrant |
|
$ |
22.82 |
|
Expected term based on contractual term |
|
10 years |
Expected volatility based on 10-year historical volatility of the Companys stock |
|
|
37 |
% |
Expected annual dividend yield |
|
|
1 |
% |
Risk-free rate based on 10-year U.S. Treasury strip rate |
|
|
2.72 |
% |
Using that model, each of the 1,643,295 shares underlying the warrant was valued at $8.33 and,
correspondingly, the aggregate fair value of the warrant was $13.7 million.
The fair value of the preferred stock was determined using a discounted cash flow model which
discounted the contractual principal balance of $250 million and the contractual dividend payment
of 5% for the first five years at a 13% discount rate. The discount rate was derived from the
average and median yields on existing fixed rate preferred stock issuances of eleven different
commercial banks in the central United States, which average and median results approximated 13% on
the date of valuation. Using this methodology, the fair value of the preferred stock was estimated
to be $181.8 million.
In relative terms, a summary of the above valuation is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relative |
|
|
Amount |
|
Fair Value |
Fair value of preferred stock |
|
$ |
181.8 |
million |
|
|
93.0 |
% |
Fair value of warrants |
|
$ |
13.7 |
million |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value |
|
$ |
195.5 |
million |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Applying the relative value percentages of 93% for the preferred stock and 7% for the warrants to
the total proceeds of $250 million, the resulting valuation of the preferred stock and warrants at
the date of issuance is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds allocated to Preferred Stock ($250 million multiplied by 93%) |
|
$232.5 million |
Proceeds allocated to Warrants ($250 million multiplied by 7%) |
|
$17.5 million |
For as long as any shares of Series B Preferred Stock are outstanding, the ability of the Company
to declare or pay dividends or distributions on, or purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire for
consideration, shares of its common stock or other securities, including trust preferred
securities, will be subject to restrictions. The U.S. Treasurys consent is required for any
increase in common dividends per share from the amount of the Companys semiannual cash dividend of
$0.18 per share, until the third anniversary of the purchase agreement with the U.S. Treasury
unless prior to such third anniversary the Series B Preferred Stock is redeemed in whole or the
U.S. Treasury has transferred all of the Series B Preferred Stock to third parties.
Earnings per Share
The following table shows the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the periods
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,017 |
|
|
$ |
6,358 |
|
Less: Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,943 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common shares Diluted |
|
|
(A |
) |
|
|
11,074 |
|
|
|
1,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
25,942 |
|
|
|
23,855 |
|
Effect of dilutive potential common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,139 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares and effect of
dilutive potential common shares |
|
|
(C |
) |
|
|
27,081 |
|
|
|
24,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
(A/B |
) |
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
(A/C |
) |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
Potentially dilutive common shares can result from stock options, restricted stock unit
awards, stock warrants (including the warrants issued to the U.S. Treasury), the Companys
convertible preferred stock and shares to be issued under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the
Directors Deferred Fee and Stock Plan, being treated as if they had been either exercised or
issued, computed by application of the treasury stock method. While potentially dilutive common
shares are typically included in the computation of diluted earnings per share, potentially
dilutive common shares are excluded from this computation in periods in which the effect would
reduce the loss per share or increase the income per share. For diluted earnings per share, net
income applicable to common shares can be affected by the conversion of the Companys convertible
preferred stock. Where the effect of this conversion would reduce the loss per share or increase
the income per share, net income applicable to common shares is adjusted by the associated
preferred dividends.
(18) Subsequent Events
On April 23, 2010, the Company announced that two of its wholly-owned subsidiary banks, Northbrook
Bank & Trust Company (Northbrook) and Wheaton Bank & Trust Company (Wheaton), in two
FDIC-assisted transactions, had acquired certain assets and liabilities and the
banking operations of Lincoln Park Savings Bank (Lincoln Park) and Wheatland Bank (Wheatland), respectively.
Lincoln Park operates four locations in Chicago, Illinois. Wheatland has one location in
Naperville, Illinois.
Northbrook assumed the outstanding deposits of Lincoln Park for a premium of approximately 0.4% and
acquired approximately $190 million of assets (subject to final adjustments) at a discount of
approximately 10.7%. The acquired assets are subject to loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC,
whereby Northbrook will share in losses and the FDIC will cover 80% of the losses of certain loans
and foreclosed property at Lincoln Park.
Wheaton assumed the majority of the outstanding deposits of Wheatland for a premium of
approximately 0.4% and acquired approximately $380 million of assets (subject to final adjustments)
at a discount of approximately 16.0%. The acquired assets are subject to loss-sharing agreements
with the FDIC, whereby Wheaton will share in losses and the FDIC will cover 80% of the losses of
certain loans and foreclosed property at Wheatland.
35
ITEM 2
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of financial condition as of March 31, 2010, compared with
December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, and the results of operations for the three month periods
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated
financial statements and notes contained in this report. This discussion contains forward-looking
statements that involve risks and uncertainties and, as such, future results could differ
significantly from managements current expectations. See the last section of this discussion for
further information on forward-looking statements.
Introduction
Wintrust is a financial holding company that provides traditional community banking services,
primarily in the Chicago metropolitan area and southeastern Wisconsin, and operates other financing
businesses on a national basis through several non-bank subsidiaries. Additionally, Wintrust offers
a full array of wealth management services primarily to customers in the Chicago metropolitan area
and southeastern Wisconsin.
Overview
The Current Economic Environment
Both the U.S. economy and the Companys local markets continue to face challenging conditions in
2010. The credit crisis that began in 2008 continues, resulting in high unemployment and depressed
home values throughout the Chicago metropolitan area and southeastern Wisconsin. In addition, the
low liquidity in the debt markets and high volatility in the equity markets impacted the entire
financial system, including the financial markets upon which the Company depends. The stress of
the existing economic environment and the depressed real estate valuations in the Companys markets
continue to impact on our business in 2010. Defaults by borrowers and the decline in fair value of
collateral resulted in the Company recording higher provisions for credit losses, higher net
charge-offs, an increase in the Companys allowance for loan losses and the restructuring of
certain borrower loan agreements in the first quarter of 2010 as compared to the first quarter of
2009. In response to these conditions, Management continues to monitor carefully the impact on the
Company of illiquidity in the financial markets, the depressed values of real property and other
assets, loan performance, default rates and other financial and macro-economic indicators in order
to navigate the challenging economic environment. In particular:
|
|
|
The Company created a dedicated division in 2008, the Managed Assets Division, to
focus on resolving problem asset situations. Comprised of experienced lenders, the
Managed Assets Division takes control of managing the Companys more significant
problem assets and also conducts ongoing reviews and evaluations of all significant
problem assets, including the formulation of action plans and updates on recent
developments. |
|
|
|
|
The Companys provision for credit losses in the first quarter of 2010 totaled
$29.0 million, an increase of $14.6 million when compared to the first quarter of 2009.
Net charge-offs increased to $26.8 million in the first quarter of 2010 (of which
$24.0 million related to commercial and commercial real estate loans), compared to only
$10.0 million for the same period in 2009 (of which $7.7 million related to commercial
and commercial real estate loans). |
|
|
|
|
The Company increased its allowance for loan losses to $102.4 million at March 31,
2010, reflecting an increase of $28.1 million, or 38%, when compared to the same period
in 2009. At March 31, 2010, approximately $50.3 million, or 49%, of the allowance for
loan losses was associated with commercial real estate loans and another $28.4 million,
or 28%, was associated with commercial loans. |
|
|
|
|
During the first quarter of 2010, Wintrust had significant exposure to commercial
real estate. At March 31, 2010, $3.3 billion, or 37%, of our loan portfolio was
commercial real estate, with more than 90% located in the greater Chicago metropolitan
and southeastern Wisconsin market areas. The commercial real estate loan portfolio was
comprised of $760.1 million related to land, residential and commercial construction,
$489.1 million related to office buildings loans, $456.7 million related to retail
loans, $455.2 million related to industrial use loans, $249.6 million related to
multi-family loans and $922.3 million related to mixed use and other use types. In
analyzing the commercial real estate market, the Company does not rely upon the
assessment of broad market statistical data, in large part because the Companys market
area is diverse and covers many communities, each of which is impacted differently by
economic forces affecting the Companys general market area. As such, the extent of the
decline in real state valuations can vary meaningfully among the different types of
commercial and other real estate loans made by the Company. The Company uses its
multi-chartered structure and local management knowledge to analyze and manage the
local market conditions at each of its banks. Despite these efforts, as of March 31, 2010,
the Company had approximately $83.6 million of non-performing commercial
real estate loans representing approximately 3% of the total commercial real estate loan
portfolio. $62.6 million, or 2%, of the total non- |
36
|
|
|
performing commercial real estate loan
portfolio related to the land, residential and commercial construction sector which remains
under stress due to the significant oversupply of new homes in certain portions of our
market area. |
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans (loans on non-accrual status and loans more than 90 days
past due and still accruing interest) were $141.0 million (of which $83.6 million, or
59%, was related to commercial real estate) at March 31, 2010, a decrease of $34.9
million compared to March 31, 2009. Non-performing loans declined as a result of
selling such loans to third parties, charging loans off or down to fair value,
collections, and transfers to other real estate owned. These actions combined with the
significant declines in real estate valuations increased net charge-offs and the
aggregate other real estate owned balance and also resulted in the decline in level of
non-performing loans. |
|
|
|
|
The Companys other real estate owned increased by $47.5 million, to $89.0 million
during the first quarter of 2010, from $41.5 million at March 31, 2009. These changes
were largely caused by the increase in properties acquired in foreclosure or received
through a deed in lieu of foreclosure related to residential real estate development
and commercial real estate loans. Specifically, the $89.0 million of other real estate
owned as of March 31, 2010 was comprised of $34.4 million of residential real estate
development property, $45.1 million of commercial real estate property and $9.5 million
of residential real estate property. |
During 2009, Management implemented a strategic effort to aggressively resolve problem loans
through liquidation, rather than retention, of loans or real estate acquired as collateral through
the foreclosure process. This strategic effort continued into the first quarter of 2010.
Management believes that some financial institutions have taken a longer term view of problem loan
situations, hoping to realize higher values on acquired collateral through extended marketing
efforts or an improvement in market conditions. Management believes that the distressed
macro-economic conditions would continue to exist in 2009 and 2010 and that the banking industrys
increase in non-performing loans would eventually lead to many properties being sold by financial
institutions, thus saturating the market and possibly driving fair values of non-performing loans
and foreclosed collateral further downwards. Accordingly, the Company attempted to liquidate as
many non-performing loans and assets as possible during 2009 and the first quarter of 2010. The
impact of those decisions and actions included a decline in non-performing loans in the first
quarter of 2010 from the same period in the prior year, an increase in the provision for credit
losses and net charge-offs in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the first quarter of 2009, an
increase in the overall level of the allowance for loan losses and an increase in other real estate
owned as the Company acquired properties for ultimate sale through foreclosure or deeds in lieu of
foreclosure. Management believes these actions will serve the Company well in the future as they
protect the Company from further valuation deterioration and permit Management to spend less time
on resolution of problem loans and more time on growing the Companys core business and the
evaluation of other opportunities presented by this volatile economic environment. The Companys
goal in 2009 was to finish the year in a position to take advantage of the opportunities that many
times result from distressed credit markets specifically, a dislocation of assets, banks and
people in the overall market. The Company continues to take advantage of these opportunities in
2010.
In this regard, in March 2010, the Company issued through a public offering a total of 6,670,000
shares of its common stock at $33.25 per share , including 870,000 shares issued at $33.25 per
share pursuant to an over-allotment option granted to the underwriters of the offering. Net
proceeds to the Company totaled $210.5 million.
Further, the level of loans past due 30 days or more and still accruing interest totaled $158.6
million as of March 31 2010, increasing $50.0 million compared to the balance of $108.6 million as
of December 31, 2009. Management is very cognizant of the volatility in and the fragile nature of
the national and local economic conditions and that some borrowers can experience severe
difficulties and default suddenly even if they have never previously been delinquent in loan
payments. Accordingly, Management believes that the current economic conditions will continue to
apply stress to the quality of the Companys loan portfolio. Accordingly, Management plans to
continue to direct significant attention toward the prompt identification, management and
resolution of problem loans.
During the first quarter of 2010, the Company restructured certain loans by providing economic
concessions to borrowers to better align the terms of their loans with their current ability to
pay. At March 31, 2010, approximately $69.4 million in loans had terms modified, with $65.3 million
of these modified loans in accruing status. These actions helped financially stressed borrowers
maintain their homes or businesses and kept these loans in an accruing status for the Company. The
Company considers restructuring loans when it appears that both the borrower and the Company can
benefit and preserve a solid and sustainable relationship.
An acceleration or significantly extended continuation in real estate valuation and macroeconomic
deterioration could result in higher default levels, a significant increase in foreclosure
activity, a material decline in the value of the Companys assets, or any combination of more than
one of these trends could have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition or
results of operations.
37
A positive result of the economic environment was that our mortgage banking operation benefited
from the low interest rate environment during 2009. Beginning in late 2008 and continuing
throughout 2009, demand for mortgage loans increased due to the fall in interest rates. The
interest rate environment coupled with the acquisition of additional staff and infrastructure
resulted in the higher levels of loan originations and loan sales in 2009. However, interest rates
for residential mortgages are not as favorable for customers in the first quarter of 2010 as they
were in 2009, which resulted in decreased demand for loan originations. The decrease in loan
originations results in lower gains on sales of loans to the secondary market to be recorded by the
Company. An increase in loss indemnification claims by purchasers of the Companys loans also
caused mortgage banking revenues to be lower in the first quarter of 2010. Mortgages originated
and sold totaled $686.7 million in the first quarter of 2010 compared to $1.2 billion in the first
quarter of 2009. The Companys practice is generally not to retain long-term fixed rate mortgages
on its balance sheet in order to mitigate interest rate risk and consequently sells most of such
mortgages into the secondary market.
Prior to its participation in the U.S. Treasurys Capital Purchase Program, the Company was
well-capitalized and in 2009 and 2010, the Companys capital ratios exceeded the minimum levels
required for it to be considered well-capitalized. The Companys participation in the CPP provided
the Company with additional capital to expand its franchise through growth in loans and deposits.
In total, the Company increased its loan portfolio from $7.8 billion at March 31, 2009 to $9.1
billion at March 31, 2010. This increase was primarily as a result of the purchase of the life
insurance premium finance portfolio which contributed to a $1.1 billion increase in that loan
portfolio. The Company continues to make new loans, including in the commercial and commercial real
estate sector, where opportunities that meet our underwriting standards exist. The withdrawal of
many banks in our area from active lending combined with our strong local relationships has
presented us with opportunities to make new loans to well qualified borrowers who have been
displaced from other institutions. For more information regarding changes in the Companys loan
portfolio, see Financial Condition Interest Earning Assets and Note 6 (Loans) of the
Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report.
Management considers the maintenance of adequate liquidity to be important to the management of
risk. Accordingly, during 2009, the Company continued its practice of maintaining appropriate
funding capacity to provide the Company with adequate liquidity for its ongoing operations. In this
regard, the Company benefited from its strong deposit base, a liquid short-term investment
portfolio and its access to funding from a variety of external funding sources, including
exceptional sources provided or facilitated by the federal government for the benefit of U.S.
financial institutions. Among such sources is the Federal Reserve Bank of New Yorks Term
Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (the TALF). In September 2009 the Company securitized a
portion of its property and casualty premium finance loan portfolio of $600 million, which was
facilitated by the premium finance loans being eligible collateral under the TALF.
The Company also benefited from its maintenance of fifteen separate banking charters, which allow
the Company to offer its MaxSafe® product. Through the MaxSafe® product, the Company offers its
customers the ability to maintain a depository account at each of the Companys banking charters
and thus receive fifteen times the ordinary FDIC limit, with the Company attending to much of the
administrative difficulties this would ordinarily require. While the FDIC insurance limit, formerly
$100,000 per depositor at each banking charter, has been raised by the FDIC to $250,000 per
depositor at each banking charter through calendar year 2013, the MaxSafe® product has allowed the
Company to attract large amounts of high quality deposits as financial distress has affected a
number of banking institutions. At March 31, 2010, the Company had over $1 billion in overnight
liquid funds and interest-bearing deposits with banks. Redeploying a portion of liquid assets into
higher yielding assets while continuing to maintain adequate liquidity remains a key priority for
2010.
Community Banking
As of March 31, 2010, our community banking franchise consisted of 15 community banks (the banks)
with 78 locations. Through these banks, we provide banking and financial services primarily to
individuals, small to mid-sized businesses, local governmental units and institutional clients
residing primarily in the banks local service areas. These services include traditional deposit
products such as demand, NOW, money market, savings and time deposit accounts, as well as a number
of unique deposit products targeted to specific market segments. The banks also offer home equity,
home mortgage, consumer, real estate and commercial loans, safe deposit facilities, ATMs, internet
banking and other innovative and traditional services specially tailored to meet the needs of
customers in their market areas. Profitability of our community banking franchise is primarily
driven by our net interest income and margin, our funding mix and related costs, the level of
non-performing loans and other real estate owned, the amount of mortgage banking revenue and our
history of establishing de novo banks.
Net interest income and margin. The primary source of our revenue is net interest income. Net
interest income is the difference between interest income and fees on earning assets, such as loans
and securities, and interest expense on liabilities to fund those assets, including deposits and
other borrowings. Net interest income can change significantly from period to period based on
general levels of interest rates, customer prepayment patterns, the mix of interest-earning assets
and the mix of interest-bearing and non-interest bearing deposits and borrowings.
38
Funding mix and related costs. Our most significant source of funding is core deposits, which are
comprised of non-interest bearing deposits, non-brokered interest-bearing transaction accounts,
savings deposits and domestic time deposits. Our branch network is our principal source of core
deposits, which generally carry lower interest rates than wholesale funds of comparable maturities.
Our profitability has been bolstered in recent quarters as fixed term certificates of deposit have
been renewing at lower rates given the historically low interest rate levels in place recently.
Level of non-performing loans and other real estate owned. The level of non-performing loans and
other real estate owned can significantly impact our profitability as these loans do not accrue any
income, can be subject to charge-offs and write-downs due to deteriorating market conditions and
generally result in additional legal and collections expenses. Given the current economic
conditions, these costs, specifically problem loan expenses, have been trending higher in recent
quarters.
Mortgage banking revenue. Our community banking franchise is also influenced by the level of fees
generated by the origination of residential mortgages and the sale of such mortgages into the
secondary market. This revenue is significantly impacted by the level of interest rates associated
with home mortgages. Recently, such interest rates have been historically low and customer
refinancing have been high, resulting in increased fee revenue. Additionally, in December 2008, we
acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of the mortgage banking business of
Professional Mortgage Partners (PMP). As a result of the acquisition, we significantly increased
the capacity of our mortgage-origination operations, primarily in the Chicago metropolitan market.
The PMP transaction also changed the mix of our mortgage origination business in the Chicago
market, resulting in a relatively greater portion of that business being retail, rather than
wholesale, oriented. The primary risk of the PMP acquisition transaction relates to the integration
of a significant number of locations and staff members into our existing mortgage operation during
a period of increased mortgage refinancing activity. Costs in the mortgage business are variable as
they primarily relate to commissions paid to originators.
Establishment of de novo operations. Our historical financial performance has been affected by
costs associated with growing market share in deposits and loans, establishing and acquiring banks,
opening new branch facilities and building an experienced management team. Our financial
performance generally reflects the improved profitability of our banking subsidiaries as they
mature, offset by the costs of establishing and acquiring banks and opening new branch facilities.
From our experience, it generally takes over 13 months for new banks to achieve operational
profitability depending on the number and timing of branch facilities added.
In determining the timing of the formation of de novo banks, the opening of additional branches of
existing banks, and the acquisition
of additional banks, we consider many factors, particularly our perceived ability to obtain an
adequate return on our invested capital driven largely by the then existing cost of funds and
lending margins, the general economic climate and the level of competition in a given market. We
began to slow the rate of growth of new locations in 2007 due to tightening net interest margins on
new business which, in the opinion of management, did not provide enough net interest spread to be
able to garner a sufficient return on our invested capital. Since the second quarter of 2008, we
have not established a new banking location either through a de novo opening or through an
acquisition (other than FDIC-assisted transactions), due to the financial system crisis and recessionary economy and our decision to
utilize our capital to support our existing franchise rather than deploy our capital for expansion
through new locations which tend to operate at a loss in the early months of operation. Thus, while
expansion activity during the past three years has been at a level below earlier periods in our
history, we expect to resume de novo bank openings, formation of additional branches and
acquisitions of additional banks when favorable market conditions return or particular expansion opportunities become available. On April 23, 2010, the
Company announced that two of its wholly-owned subsidiary banks, Northbrook Bank & Trust Company and Wheaton Bank & Trust Company, in two FDIC-assisted transactions, had
respectively acquired certain assets and liabilities and the banking operations of Lincoln Park
Savings Bank and Wheatland Bank.
In addition to the factors considered above, before we engage in expansion through de novo branches
or banks we must first make a determination that the expansion fulfills our objective of enhancing
shareholder value through potential future earnings growth and enhancement of the overall franchise
value of the Company. Generally, we believe that, in normal market conditions, expansion through de
novo growth is a better long-term investment than acquiring banks because the cost to bring a de
novo location to profitability is generally substantially less than the premium paid for the
acquisition of a healthy bank. Each opportunity to expand is unique from a cost and benefit
perspective. Factors including the valuation of our stock, other economic market conditions, the
size and scope of the particular expansion opportunity and competitive landscape all influence the
decision to expand via de novo growth or through acquisition.
39
Specialty Finance
Through our specialty finance segment, we offer financing of insurance premiums for businesses and
individuals; accounts receivable financing, value-added, out-sourced administrative services; and
other specialty finance businesses. We conduct our specialty finance businesses through indirect
non-bank subsidiaries. Our wholly owned subsidiary, First Insurance Funding Corporation (FIFC)
engages in the premium finance receivables business, our most significant specialized lending
niche, including commercial insurance premium finance and life insurance premium finance.
Financing of Commercial Insurance Premiums
FIFC originated approximately $849.3 million in commercial insurance premium finance receivables in
the first quarter of 2010. FIFC makes loans to businesses to finance the insurance premiums they
pay on their commercial insurance policies. The loans are originated by FIFC working through
independent medium and large insurance agents and brokers located throughout the United States. The
insurance premiums financed are primarily for commercial customers purchases of liability,
property and casualty and other commercial insurance. This lending involves relatively rapid
turnover of the loan portfolio and high volume of loan originations. Because of the indirect nature
of this lending and because the borrowers are located nationwide, this segment may be more
susceptible to third party fraud than relationship lending; however, management has established
various control procedures to mitigate the risks associated with this lending. The majority of
these loans are purchased by the banks in order to more fully utilize their lending capacity as
these loans generally provide the banks with higher yields than alternative investments.
Historically, FIFC originations that were not purchased by the banks were sold to unrelated third
parties with servicing retained. However, during the third quarter of 2009, FIFC initially sold
$695 million in commercial premium finance receivables to our indirect subsidiary, FIFC Premium
Funding I, LLC, which in turn sold $600 million in aggregate principal amount of notes backed by
such premium finance receivables in a securitization transaction sponsored by FIFC. Subsequent to
December 31, 2009, this securitization transaction is accounted for as a secured borrowing and the
securitization entity is treated as a consolidated subsidiary of the Company. Accordingly,
beginning on January 1, 2010, all of the assets and liabilities of the securitization entity are
included directly on the Companys Consolidated Statement of Condition.
The primary driver of profitability related to the financing of commercial insurance premiums is
the net interest spread that FIFC can produce between the yields on the loans generated and the
cost of funds allocated to the business unit. The commercial insurance premium finance business is
a competitive industry and yields on loans are influenced by the market rates offered by our
competitors. We fund these loans either through the securitization facility described above or
through our deposits, the cost of which is influenced by competitors in the retail banking markets
in the Chicago and Milwaukee metropolitan areas.
Financing of Life Insurance Premiums
In 2007, FIFC began financing life insurance policy premiums generally for high net-worth
individuals. FIFC originated approximately $71.3 million in life insurance premium finance
receivables in the first quarter of 2010. These loans are originated directly with the borrowers
with assistance from life insurance carriers, independent insurance agents, financial advisors and
legal counsel. The life insurance policy is the primary form of collateral. In addition, these
loans often are secured with a letter of credit, marketable securities or certificates of deposit.
In some cases, FIFC may make a loan that has a partially unsecured position. In July 2009, FIFC
expanded this niche lending business segment when it purchased a portfolio of domestic life
insurance premium finance loans for an aggregate purchase price of $685.3 million. Also, as part
of the purchase, an aggregate of $84.4 million of additional life insurance premium finance assets
were available for future purchase by FIFC subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. On
October 2, 2009, the conditions were satisfied in relation to the majority of the additional life
insurance premium finance assets and FIFC purchased $83.4 million of the $84.4 million of life
insurance premium finance assets available for an aggregate purchase price of $60.5 million in
cash.
As with the commercial premium finance business, the primary driver of profitability related to the
financing of life insurance premiums is the net interest spread that FIFC can produce between the
yields on the loans generated and the cost of funds allocated to the business unit.
Profitability of financing both commercial and life insurance premiums is also meaningfully
impacted by leveraging information technology systems, maintaining operational efficiency and
increasing average loan size, each of which allows us to expand our loan volume without significant
capital investment.
Wealth Management Activities
We currently offer a full range of wealth management services through three separate subsidiaries,
including trust and investment services, asset management and securities brokerage services,
marketed primarily under the Wayne Hummer name.
The primary influences on the profitability of the wealth management business can be associated
with the level of commission received related to the trading performed by the brokerage customers
for their accounts and the amount of assets under management for which asset management and trust
units receive a management fee for advisory, administrative and custodial services. As such,
revenues are influenced by a rise or fall in the debt and equity markets and the resultant increase
or decrease in the value of our client accounts on which our fees are based. The commissions
received by the brokerage unit are not as directly influenced by the
40
directionality of the debt and
equity markets but rather the desire of our customers to engage in trading based on their
particular situations and outlooks of the market or particular stocks and bonds. Profitability in
the brokerage business is impacted by commissions which fluctuate over time.
Federal Government, Federal Reserve and FDIC Programs
Since October of 2008, the federal government, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the New York
Fed) and the FDIC have made a number of programs available to banks and other financial
institutions in an effort to ensure a well-functioning U.S. financial system. We participate in
three of these programs: the CPP, administered by the Treasury, TALF, created by the New York Fed,
and the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP), created by the FDIC.
Participation in Capital Purchase Program. In October 2008, the Treasury announced that it intended
to use a portion of the initial funds allocated to it pursuant to the Troubled Asset Relief Program
(TARP), created by the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, to invest directly in
financial institutions through the newly-created CPP. At that time, U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry
Paulson stated that the program was designed to attract broad participation by healthy
institutions which have plenty of capital to get through this period, but are not positioned to
lend as widely as is necessary to support our economy. Our management believed at the time of the
CPP investment, as it does now, that Treasurys CPP investment was not necessary for the Companys
short or long-term health. However, the CPP investment presented an opportunity for us. By
providing us with a significant source of relatively inexpensive capital, the Treasurys CPP
investment allows us to accelerate our growth cycle and expand lending.
Consequently, we applied for CPP funds and our application was accepted by Treasury. As a result,
on December 19, 2008, we entered into an agreement with the U.S. Department of the Treasury to
participate in Treasurys CPP, pursuant to which we issued and sold preferred stock and a warrant
to Treasury in exchange for aggregate consideration of $250 million (the CPP investment). As a
result of the CPP investment, our total risk based capital ratio as of December 31, 2008 increased
from 10.3% to 13.1%. To be considered well capitalized, we must maintain a total risk-based
capital ratio in excess of 10%. The terms of our agreement with Treasury impose significant
restrictions upon us, including increased scrutiny by Treasury, banking regulators and Congress,
additional corporate governance requirements, restrictions upon our ability to repurchase stock and
pay dividends and, as a result of increasingly stringent regulations issued by Treasury following
the closing of the CPP investment, significant restrictions upon executive compensation. Pursuant
to the terms of the agreement between Treasury and us, Treasury is permitted to amend the agreement
unilaterally in order to comply with any changes in applicable federal statutes.
The CPP investment provided the Company with additional capital resources which in turn permitted
the expansion of the flow of credit to U.S. consumers and businesses beyond what we would have done
without the CPP funding. The capital itself is not loaned to our borrowers but represents
additional shareholders equity that has been leveraged by the Company to permit it to provide new
loans to qualified borrowers and raise deposits to fund the additional lending without incurring
excessive risk.
Due to the combination of our prior decisions in appropriately managing our risks, the capital
support provided from the August 2008 private issuance of $50 million of convertible preferred
stock and the March 2010 common stock issuance of $211 million, as well as the additional capital
support from the CPP, we have been able to take advantage of opportunities when they have arisen
and our banks continue to be active lenders within their communities. Without the additional funds
from the CPP, our prudent management philosophy and strict underwriting standards likely would have
required us to continue to restrain lending due to the need to preserve capital during these
uncertain economic conditions.
For additional information on the terms of the preferred stock and the warrant, see Note 17 of the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
TALF-Eligible Issuance. In September 2009, our indirect subsidiary, FIFC Premium Funding I, LLC,
sold $600 million in aggregate principal amount of its Series 2009-A Premium Finance Asset Backed
Notes, Class A (the Notes), which were issued in a securitization transaction sponsored by FIFC.
FIFC Premium Funding I, LLCs obligations under the Notes are secured by revolving loans made to
buyers of property and casualty insurance policies to finance the related premiums payable by the
buyers to the insurance companies for the policies. At the time of issuance, the Notes were
eligible collateral under TALF and certain investors therefore received non-recourse funding from
the New York Fed in order to purchase the Notes. As a result, FIFC believes it received greater
proceeds at lower interest rates from the securitization than it otherwise would have received in
non-TALF-eligible transactions. As a result, if TALF is not renewed or is allowed to expire, it is
possible that funding our growth will be more costly if we pursue similar transactions in the
future. However, as is true in the case of the CPP investment, management views the TALF-eligible
securitization as a funding mechanism offering us the ability to accelerate our growth plan, rather
than one essential to the maintenance of our well capitalized status.
TLGP Guarantee. In November 2008, the FDIC adopted a final rule establishing the TLGP. The TLGP
provided two limited guarantee programs: One, the Debt Guarantee Program, that guaranteed
newly-issued senior unsecured debt, and another, the Transaction Account Guarantee program (TAG)
that guaranteed certain non-interest-bearing transaction accounts at insured
depository institutions. All insured depository institutions that offer non-interest-bearing
transaction accounts had the option to participate in either program. We did not participate in the
Debt Guarantee Program. In December 2008, each of our subsidiary banks
41
elected to participate in
the TAG, which provides unlimited FDIC insurance coverage for the entire account balance in
exchange for an additional insurance premium to be paid by the depository institution for accounts
with balances in excess of the current FDIC insurance limit of $250,000. This additional insurance
coverage would continue through December 31, 2009. In October 2009, the FDIC notified depository
institutions that it was extending the TAG program for an additional six months until June 30, 2010
at the option of participating banks. Our subsidiary banks have determined that it is in their best
interest to continue participation in the TAG program and have opted to participate for the
additional six-month period.
Acquisition of the Life Insurance Premium Finance Business
Overview
As previously described, on July 28, 2009 our subsidiary FIFC purchased the majority of the U.S.
life insurance premium finance assets of subsidiaries of American International Group, Inc. Life
insurance premium finance loans are generally used for estate planning purposes of high net worth
borrowers, and, as described below, are collateralized by life insurance policies and their related
cash surrender value and are often additionally secured by letters of credit, annuities, cash and
marketable securities. Based upon an analysis of the payment patterns of the acquired life
insurance premium finance loans over a seven year period, the Company believes that the average
expected life of such loans is 5 to 7 years.
Credit Risk
The Company believes that its life insurance premium finance loans tend to have a lower level of
risk and delinquency than the Companys commercial and residential real estate loans because of the
nature of the collateral. The life insurance policy is the primary form of collateral. If cash surrender value is not
sufficient, then letters of credit, marketable securities or certificates of deposit are used to
provide additional security. Since the collateral is highly liquid and generally has a value in
excess of the loan amount, any defaults or delinquencies are generally cured relatively quickly by
the borrower or the collateral is generally liquidated in an expeditious manner to satisfy the loan
obligation. Greater than 95% of loans are fully secured. However, less than 5% of the loans are
partially unsecured and in those cases, a greater risk exists for default. No loans are originated
on a fully unsecured basis.
Fair Market Valuation at Date of Purchase and Allowance for Loan Losses
ASC 805 requires acquired loans to be recorded at fair market value. The application of ASC 805
requires incorporation of credit related factors directly into the fair value of the loans recorded
at the acquisition date, thereby eliminating separate recognition of the acquired allowance for
loan losses on the acquirers balance sheet. Accordingly, the Company established a credit discount
for each loan as part of the determination of the fair market value of such loan in accordance with
those accounting principles at the date of acquisition. See Note 6 of the Financial Statements
presented under Item 1 of this report for a detailed roll-forward of the aggregate credit discounts
established and any activity associated with balances since the dates of acquisition. Any adverse
changes in the deemed collectible nature of a loan would subsequently be provided through a charge
to the income statement through a provision for credit losses and a corresponding establishment of
an allowance for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses associated with this portfolio of loans
was $607,000 at March 31, 2010. This allowance represents deterioration to the portfolio
subsequent to acquisition.
42
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Earnings Summary
The Companys key operating measures for 2010, as compared to the same period last year, are shown
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Three Months |
|
Percentage (%) or |
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Basis Point (bp) |
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
Change |
Net income |
|
$ |
16,017 |
|
|
$ |
6,358 |
|
|
|
152 |
% |
Net income per common share Diluted |
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue (1) |
|
|
138,472 |
|
|
|
101,209 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
95,865 |
|
|
|
64,782 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (2) |
|
|
3.38 |
% |
|
|
2.71 |
% |
|
|
67 |
bp |
Net overhead ratio (3) |
|
|
1.33 |
|
|
|
1.53 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
Efficiency ratio (2) (4) |
|
|
60.59 |
|
|
|
74.10 |
|
|
|
(1,351 |
) |
Return on average assets |
|
|
0.52 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Return on average common equity |
|
|
4.93 |
|
|
|
0.71 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
12,839,978 |
|
|
$ |
10,818,941 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
Total loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
9,070,562 |
|
|
|
7,841,447 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Total loans, including loans held-for-sale |
|
|
9,226,611 |
|
|
|
8,060,154 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Total deposits |
|
|
9,724,870 |
|
|
|
8,625,977 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
249,493 |
|
|
|
249,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
1,364,832 |
|
|
|
1,063,227 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per common share |
|
|
34.76 |
|
|
|
32.64 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Market price per common share |
|
|
37.21 |
|
|
|
12.30 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses to total loans (5) |
|
|
1.17 |
% |
|
|
0.97 |
% |
|
|
20 |
bp |
Total credit reserves to total loans (6) |
|
|
1.54 |
% |
|
|
0.97 |
% |
|
|
57 |
|
Non-performing loans to total loans |
|
|
1.55 |
|
|
|
2.24 |
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net revenue is net interest income plus non-interest income. |
|
(2) |
|
See following section titled, Supplemental Financial
Measures/Ratios for additional information on this performance
measure/ratio. |
|
(3) |
|
The net overhead ratio is calculated by netting total
non-interest expense and total non-interest income, annualizing
this amount, and dividing by that periods total average assets.
A lower ratio indicates a higher degree of efficiency. |
|
(4) |
|
The efficiency ratio is calculated by dividing total non-interest
expense by tax-equivalent net revenue (less securities gains or
losses). A lower ratio indicates more efficient revenue
generation. |
|
(5) |
|
The allowance for credit losses includes both the allowance for
loan losses and the allowance for lending-related commitments. |
|
(6) |
|
The sum of allowance for credit losses and credit discounts on
purchased life insurance premium finance loans divided by total
loans outstanding plus the credit discounts on purchased life
insurance premium finance loans. |
Certain returns, yields, performance ratios, and quarterly growth rates are annualized in this
presentation and throughout this report to represent an annual time period. This is done for
analytical purposes to better discern for decision-making purposes underlying performance trends
when compared to full-year or year-over-year amounts. For example, balance sheet growth rates are
most often expressed in terms of an annual rate. As such, 5% growth during a quarter would
represent an annualized growth rate of 20%.
43
Supplemental Financial Measures/Ratios
The accounting and reporting polices of Wintrust conform to generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) in the United States and prevailing practices in the banking industry. However,
certain non-GAAP performance measures and ratios are used by management to evaluate and measure the
Companys performance. These include taxable-equivalent net interest income (including its
individual components), net interest margin (including its individual components) and the
efficiency ratio. Management believes that these measures and ratios provide users of the Companys
financial information with a more meaningful view of the performance of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities and of the Companys operating efficiency. Other financial holding
companies may define or calculate these measures and ratios differently.
Management reviews yields on certain asset categories and the net interest margin of the Company
and its banking subsidiaries on a fully taxable-equivalent (FTE) basis. In this non-GAAP
presentation, net interest income is adjusted to reflect tax-exempt interest income on an
equivalent before-tax basis. This measure ensures comparability of net interest income arising from
both taxable and tax-exempt sources. Net interest income on a FTE basis is also used in the
calculation of the Companys efficiency ratio. The efficiency ratio, which is calculated by
dividing non-interest expense by total taxable-equivalent net revenue (less securities gains or
losses), measures how much it costs to produce one dollar of revenue. Securities gains or losses
are excluded from this calculation to better match revenue from daily operations to operational
expenses.
A reconciliation of certain non-GAAP performance measures and ratios used by the Company to
evaluate and measure the Companys performance to the most directly comparable GAAP financial
measures is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
(A) Interest income (GAAP) |
|
$ |
142,496 |
|
|
$ |
122,079 |
|
Taxable-equivalent adjustment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
Liquidity management assets |
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
Other earning assets |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income FTE |
|
$ |
142,942 |
|
|
$ |
122,699 |
|
(B) Interest expense (GAAP) |
|
|
46,631 |
|
|
|
57,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income FTE |
|
$ |
96,311 |
|
|
$ |
65,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(C) Net interest income (GAAP) (A minus B) |
|
$ |
95,865 |
|
|
$ |
64,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(D) Net interest margin (GAAP) |
|
|
3.36 |
% |
|
|
2.68 |
% |
Net interest margin FTE |
|
|
3.38 |
% |
|
|
2.71 |
% |
(E) Efficiency ratio (GAAP) |
|
|
60.79 |
% |
|
|
74.54 |
% |
Efficiency ratio FTE |
|
|
60.59 |
% |
|
|
74.10 |
% |
Critical Accounting Policies
The Companys Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States and prevailing practices of the banking industry.
Application of these principles requires management to make estimates, assumptions, and judgments
that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Certain
policies and accounting principles inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates,
assumptions and judgments, and as such have a greater possibility that changes in those estimates
and assumptions could produce financial results that are materially different than originally
reported. Estimates, assumptions and judgments are necessary when assets and liabilities are
required to be recorded at fair value, when a decline in the value of an asset not carried on the
financial statements at fair value warrants an impairment write-down or valuation reserve to be
established, or when an asset or liability needs to be recorded contingent upon a future event, are
based on information available as of the date of the financial statements; accordingly, as
information changes, the financial statements could reflect different estimates and assumptions.
Management views critical accounting policies to be those which are highly dependent on subjective
or complex judgments, estimates and assumptions, and where changes in those estimates and
assumptions could have a significant impact on the financial statements. Management currently views
critical accounting policies to include the determination of the allowance for loan losses and the
allowance for losses on lending-related commitments, estimations of fair value, the valuations
required for impairment testing of goodwill, the valuation and accounting for derivative
instruments and income taxes as the accounting areas that require the most subjective and complex
judgments, and as such could be most subject to revision as new information becomes available. For
a more detailed discussion on these critical accounting policies, see Summary of Critical
Accounting Policies beginning on page 39 of the Companys 2009 Form 10-K.
44
Net Income
Net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 totaled $16.0 million, an increase of $9.7 million,
or 152%, compared to the first quarter of 2009, and a decrease of approximately $12.2 million, or
43%, compared to the fourth quarter of 2009. On a per share basis, net income for the first quarter
of 2010 totaled $0.41 per diluted common share, an increase of $0.35 per share as compared to the
2009 first quarter total of $0.06 per diluted common share. Compared to the fourth quarter of 2009,
net income per diluted share in the first quarter of 2010 decreased $0.49, or 54%.
The most significant factors affecting net income for the first quarter of 2010 as compared to the
same period in the prior year include an increase in net interest income and a gain on bargain
purchase as a result of the acquisition of the life insurance premium finance portfolio offset by
an increase in the provision for credit losses and lower mortgage banking revenues. Additionally,
as a result of the Companys issuance of 6.67 million common shares for net proceeds of $210.5
million and favorable market pricing in the Companys shares in the first quarter of 2010, average
common shares and dilutive common shares increased by approximately three million shares, or 12%,
compared to the same period in 2009. The return on average equity for the first quarter of 2010
was 4.93%, compared to 0.71% for the prior year first quarter and 10.97% for the fourth quarter of
2009.
45
Net Interest Income
Net interest income, which represents the difference between interest income and fees on earning
assets and interest expense on deposits and borrowings, is the major source of earnings for the
Company. Interest rate fluctuations and the volume and mix of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities impact net interest income. Net interest margin represents
tax-equivalent net interest income as a percentage of the average earning assets during the period.
The following table presents a summary of the Companys net interest income and related net
interest margins, calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis, for the first quarter of 2010 as
compared to the first quarter of 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
Liquidity management assets (1) (2) (7) |
|
$ |
2,384,122 |
|
|
$ |
13,155 |
|
|
|
2.24 |
% |
|
$ |
1,839,161 |
|
|
$ |
15,499 |
|
|
|
3.42 |
% |
Other earning assets (2) (3) (7) |
|
|
26,269 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
2.53 |
|
|
|
22,128 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
2.85 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income (2) (4) (7) |
|
|
9,150,078 |
|
|
|
129,623 |
|
|
|
5.75 |
|
|
|
7,924,849 |
|
|
|
107,045 |
|
|
|
5.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets (7) |
|
$ |
11,560,469 |
|
|
$ |
142,942 |
|
|
|
5.01 |
% |
|
$ |
9,786,138 |
|
|
$ |
122,699 |
|
|
|
5.08 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(107,257 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72,044 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
113,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,024,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
903,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
12,590,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,724,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
8,818,012 |
|
|
$ |
33,212 |
|
|
|
1.53 |
% |
|
$ |
7,747,879 |
|
|
$ |
45,953 |
|
|
|
2.41 |
% |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
429,195 |
|
|
|
4,346 |
|
|
|
4.11 |
|
|
|
435,982 |
|
|
|
4,453 |
|
|
|
4.14 |
|
Notes payable and other borrowings |
|
|
225,919 |
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
2.63 |
|
|
|
301,894 |
|
|
|
1,870 |
|
|
|
2.51 |
|
Secured borrowings owed to securitization investors |
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
2,995 |
|
|
|
2.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
1.60 |
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
3.31 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
249,493 |
|
|
|
4,375 |
|
|
|
7.01 |
|
|
|
249,506 |
|
|
|
4,441 |
|
|
|
7.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
$ |
10,382,619 |
|
|
$ |
46,631 |
|
|
|
1.82 |
% |
|
$ |
8,805,261 |
|
|
$ |
57,297 |
|
|
|
2.64 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits |
|
|
858,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
733,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
153,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
1,196,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,061,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
12,590,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,724,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread (5) (7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.44 |
% |
Net free funds/contribution (6) |
|
$ |
1,177,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
980,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income/Net interest margin (7) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
96,311 |
|
|
|
3.38 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
65,402 |
|
|
|
2.71 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Liquidity management assets include available-for-sale securities, interest earning deposits with banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest income on tax-advantaged loans, trading account securities and securities reflects a tax-equivalent adjustment based on a marginal federal corporate tax rate of 35%. The total adjustments for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were $446,000 and $620,000
respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
Other earning assets include brokerage customer receivables and trading account securities. |
|
(4) |
|
Loans, net of unearned income, include loans held-for-sale and non-accrual loans. |
|
(5) |
|
Interest rate spread is the difference between the yield earned on earning assets and the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(6) |
|
Net free funds are the difference between total average earning assets and total average interest-bearing liabilities. The estimated contribution to net interest margin from net free funds is calculated using the rate paid for total interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(7) |
|
See Supplemental Financial Measures/Ratios for additional information on this performance measure/ratio. |
46
Quarter Ended March 31, 2010 compared to the Quarter Ended March 31, 2009
Tax-equivalent net interest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 totaled $96.3 million, an
increase of $30.9 million, or 47%, as compared to the $65.4 million recorded in the same quarter of
2009. For the first quarter of 2010, the net interest margin was 3.38%, up 67 basis points when
compared to the net interest margin of 2.71% in the same quarter of 2009.
The higher level of net interest income recorded in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the first
quarter of 2009 was primarily attributable to the impact of the acquisition of the life insurance
premium finance assets in the second half of 2009 and lower retail deposit costs. Approximately
$1.1 billion of the increase in average total loans is attributable to life insurance premium
finance loans including those purchased in the transaction or originated by the Company.
In the first quarter of 2010, the yield on earning assets decreased seven basis points and the rate
on interest-bearing liabilities decreased 82 basis points compared to the first quarter of 2009.
Retail deposit re-pricing opportunities over the past 12 months, due to a sustained low interest
rate environment and more stable financial markets, contributed to the majority of this decreased
cost. The rate paid on interest-bearing deposits decreased 88 basis points when compared to the
first quarter of 2009.
47
The following table presents a summary of the Companys net interest income and related net
interest margins, calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis, for the first quarter of 2010 as
compared to the fourth quarter of 2009 (sequential quarters):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
Liquidity management assets (1) (2) (7) |
|
$ |
2,384,122 |
|
|
$ |
13,155 |
|
|
|
2.24 |
% |
|
$ |
2,569,584 |
|
|
$ |
14,932 |
|
|
|
2.31 |
% |
Other earning assets (2) (3) (7) |
|
|
26,269 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
2.53 |
|
|
|
26,167 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
2.59 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income (2) (4) (7) |
|
|
9,150,078 |
|
|
|
129,623 |
|
|
|
5.75 |
|
|
|
8,604,006 |
|
|
|
122,240 |
|
|
|
5.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets (7) |
|
$ |
11,560,469 |
|
|
$ |
142,942 |
|
|
|
5.01 |
% |
|
$ |
11,199,757 |
|
|
$ |
137,343 |
|
|
|
4.87 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(107,257 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97,269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
113,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,024,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
962,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
12,590,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,189,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
8,818,012 |
|
|
$ |
33,212 |
|
|
|
1.53 |
% |
|
$ |
9,016,863 |
|
|
$ |
38,998 |
|
|
|
1.72 |
% |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
429,195 |
|
|
|
4,346 |
|
|
|
4.11 |
|
|
|
432,028 |
|
|
|
4,510 |
|
|
|
4.14 |
|
Notes payable and other borrowings |
|
|
225,919 |
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
2.63 |
|
|
|
234,754 |
|
|
|
1,663 |
|
|
|
2.81 |
|
Secured borrowings owed to securitization investors |
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
2,995 |
|
|
|
2.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
1.60 |
|
|
|
63,261 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
1.77 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
249,493 |
|
|
|
4,375 |
|
|
|
7.01 |
|
|
|
249,493 |
|
|
|
4,438 |
|
|
|
6.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
$ |
10,382,619 |
|
|
$ |
46,631 |
|
|
|
1.82 |
% |
|
$ |
9,996,399 |
|
|
$ |
49,895 |
|
|
|
1.98 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits |
|
|
858,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
886,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
153,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
1,196,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,126,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
12,590,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,189,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread (5) (7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.89 |
% |
Net free funds/contribution (6) |
|
$ |
1,177,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
1,203,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income/Net interest margin (7) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
96,311 |
|
|
|
3.38 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
87,448 |
|
|
|
3.10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Liquidity management assets include available-for-sale securities, interest earning deposits with banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest income on tax-advantaged loans, trading account securities and securities reflects a tax-equivalent adjustment based on a marginal federal corporate tax rate of 35%. The total adjustments for the three months ended March 31, 2010
was $446,000 and for the three months ended December 31, 2009 was $513,000. |
|
(3) |
|
Other earning assets include brokerage customer receivables and trading account securities. |
|
(4) |
|
Loans, net of unearned income, include loans held-for-sale and non-accrual loans. |
|
(5) |
|
Interest rate spread is the difference between the yield earned on earning assets and the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(6) |
|
Net free funds are the difference between total average earning assets and total average interest-bearing liabilities. The estimated contribution to net interest margin from net free funds is calculated using the rate paid for total
interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(7) |
|
See Supplemental Financial Measures/Ratios for additional information on this performance measure/ratio. |
48
Quarter Ended March 31, 2010 compared to the Quarter Ended December 31, 2009
Tax-equivalent net interest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 totaled $96.3 million, an
increase of $8.9 million, or 10%, as compared to the $87.4 million recorded in the fourth quarter
of 2009. For the first quarter of 2010, the net interest margin was 3.38%, up 28 basis points when
compared to the 3.10% recorded in the fourth quarter of 2009.
Approximately $6.6 million of the $8.9 million increase in net interest income recorded in the
first quarter of 2010 compared to the fourth quarter of 2009 was attributable to the impact of the
loan securitization being reflected on the Companys balance sheet beginning January 1, 2010. The
remaining $2.3 million of the increase in net interest income can be primarily attributed to lower
retail deposit costs.
In the first quarter of 2010, the yield on loans increased 11 basis points (five basis points
excluding the impact of the loan securitization) and the rate on interest-bearing deposits
decreased 19 basis points compared to the fourth quarter of 2009. Management believes
opportunities continue for increasing credit spreads in commercial and commercial real estate loan
portfolios and for lower rates from the re-pricing of maturing retail certificates of deposits,
both of which should contribute to net interest margin expansion during the remainder of 2010.
Additionally, opportunities exist for further net interest margin expansion if the Company can
re-deploy low yielding liquidity management assets into higher yielding outstanding loan balances.
Analysis of Changes in Tax-equivalent Net Interest Income
The following table presents an analysis of the changes in the Companys tax-equivalent net
interest income comparing the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009, and the
three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The reconciliations set forth the
changes in the tax-equivalent net interest income as a result of changes in volumes, changes in
rates and differing number of days in each period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
of 2010 |
|
|
of 2010 |
|
|
|
Compared to |
|
|
Compared to |
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
of 2009 |
|
|
of 2009 |
|
Tax-equivalent net interest income for comparative period |
|
$ |
65,402 |
|
|
$ |
87,448 |
|
Change due to mix and growth of earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities (volume) |
|
|
10,647 |
|
|
|
2,168 |
|
Change due to interest rate fluctuations (rate) |
|
|
20,262 |
|
|
|
8,638 |
|
Change due to number of days in each period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,943 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-equivalent net interest income for the period
ended March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
96,311 |
|
|
$ |
96,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
Non-interest Income
For the first quarter of 2010, non-interest income totaled $42.6 million, an increase of $6.2
million, or 17%, compared to the first quarter of 2009. The increase was primarily attributable to
the bargain purchase gain related to the life insurance premium finance loan acquisition and higher
wealth management revenues, partially offset by a decrease in mortgage banking revenue and trading
income.
The following table presents non-interest income by category for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
Brokerage |
|
$ |
5,554 |
|
|
$ |
3,819 |
|
|
|
1,735 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Trust and asset management |
|
|
3,113 |
|
|
|
2,107 |
|
|
|
1,006 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total wealth management |
|
|
8,667 |
|
|
|
5,926 |
|
|
|
2,741 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking |
|
|
9,727 |
|
|
|
16,232 |
|
|
|
(6,505 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
3,332 |
|
|
|
2,970 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Gain on sales of premium finance receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
(322 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
Gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net |
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
(2,038 |
) |
|
|
2,430 |
|
|
|
(119 |
) |
Gain on bargain purchase |
|
|
10,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,894 |
|
|
NM |
Trading income |
|
|
5,973 |
|
|
|
8,744 |
|
|
|
(2,771 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees from covered call options |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
1,998 |
|
|
|
(1,709 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
Bank Owned Life Insurance |
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
Administrative services |
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Miscellaneous |
|
|
2,128 |
|
|
|
1,505 |
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other |
|
|
3,622 |
|
|
|
4,271 |
|
|
|
(649 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
$ |
42,607 |
|
|
$ |
36,427 |
|
|
|
6,180 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth management revenue is comprised of the trust and asset management revenue of
Wayne Hummer Trust Company and the asset management fees, brokerage commissions, trading
commissions and insurance product commissions at Wayne Hummer Investments and Wayne Hummer Asset
Management Company. Wealth management revenue totaled $8.7 million in the first quarter of 2010 and
$5.9 million in the first quarter of 2009. Increased asset valuations due to equity market
improvements have helped revenue growth from trust and asset management activities. Additionally,
the improvement in the equity markets overall have lead to the increase of the brokerage component
of wealth management revenue as customer trading activity has increased.
Mortgage banking revenue includes revenue from activities related to originating, selling and
servicing residential real estate loans for the secondary market. For the quarter ended March 31,
2010, this revenue source totaled $9.7 million, a decrease of $6.5 million when compared to the
first quarter of 2009. Mortgages originated and sold totaled $687 million in the first quarter of
2010 compared to $953 million in the fourth quarter of 2009 and $1.2 billion in the first quarter
of 2009. The decrease in mortgage banking revenue resulted primarily from a decrease in loan
originations and an increase in loss indemnification claims by purchasers of the Companys loans.
Quickly falling mortgage interest rates at the end of 2008 spurred refinancing activity during the
first half of 2009. Interest rates for residential mortgage loans are not as favorable for
customers in the first quarter of 2010 as they were in 2009 resulting in decreased demand for loan
originations. The decrease in loan originations directly causes lower gains on sales of loans to
the secondary market to be recorded by the Company. In addition, the Company enters into
residential mortgage loan sale agreements with investors in the normal course of business. On
occasion, investors have requested the Company to indemnify them against losses on certain loans or
to repurchase loans which the investors believe do not comply with applicable representations. The
increase in the velocity of loss indemnification has negatively impacted mortgage banking revenue
as additional recourse expense was recorded over the past two quarters. This liability on loans
expected to be repurchased from loans sold to investors is based on trends in repurchase and
indemnification requests, actual loss experience, known and inherent risks in the loans, and
current economic conditions.
50
A summary of the mortgage banking revenue components is shown below:
Mortgage banking revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans originated and sold |
|
$ |
686,679 |
|
|
$ |
952,624 |
|
|
$ |
1,245,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans serviced |
|
$ |
750,413 |
|
|
$ |
738,372 |
|
|
$ |
608,592 |
|
Fair value of mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) |
|
$ |
6,602 |
|
|
$ |
6,745 |
|
|
$ |
4,163 |
|
MSRs as a percentage of loans serviced |
|
|
0.88 |
% |
|
|
0.91 |
% |
|
|
0.68 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sales of loans |
|
$ |
13,478 |
|
|
$ |
18,067 |
|
|
$ |
19,403 |
|
Derivative/Fair value, net |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
(710 |
) |
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
(538 |
) |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(1,659 |
) |
Recourse obligation on loans sold |
|
|
(3,452 |
) |
|
|
(1,699 |
) |
|
|
(802 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage banking revenue |
|
$ |
9,727 |
|
|
$ |
16,495 |
|
|
$ |
16,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sales of loans as a percentage of loans sold |
|
|
1.96 |
% |
|
|
1.89 |
% |
|
|
1.56 |
% |
All mortgage loan servicing by the Company is performed by four of its subsidiary banks. All
loans originated and sold into the secondary market by its mortgage subsidiary, Wintrust Mortgage
Company, have been sold with mortgage servicing rights released (sold to the investors). Mortgage
servicing rights are carried on the balance sheet at fair value.
Service charges on deposit accounts totaled $3.3 million for the first quarter of 2010, an increase
of $362,000, or 12%, when compared to the same quarter of 2009. The majority of deposit service
charges relates to customary fees on overdrawn accounts and returned items. The level of service
charges received is substantially below peer group levels, as management believes in the philosophy
of providing high quality service without encumbering that service with numerous activity charges.
As a result of the new accounting requirements beginning January 1, 2010, loans transferred into
the securitization facility are accounted for as collateral for a secured borrowing rather than a
sale. Therefore, the Company no longer recognizes gains on sales of premium finance receivables for
loans transferred into the securitization. During the fourth quarter of 2009, as a result of
pay-downs of loans in the revolving securitization facility, the Company transferred $357 million
of premium finance receivables commercial to the securitization facility and recognized $4.4
million of gains. Gains recognized in the first quarter of 2009 relate to the clean up calls on
previous sales of premium finance receivables commercial to unrelated third parties.
The Company recognized a $392,000 net gain on available-for-sale securities in the first quarter of
2010 compared to a net loss of $2.0 million in the prior year quarter. Net gains (losses) on
available-for-sale securities include other-than-temporary (OTTI) charges recognized in income.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2009, the Company recognized $2.1 million, of OTTI charges on
certain corporate debt investment securities. See Note 5 of the Financial Statements presented
under Item 1 of this report for details of OTTI charges.
The gain on bargain purchase of $10.9 million recognized in the first quarter of 2010 related to
the 2009 acquisition of the life insurance premium finance receivable portfolio. In the first quarter
of 2010, third party consents were received and all remaining funds held in escrow were released,
resulting in the recognition of the remaining deferred bargain purchase gain. See Note 3 of the
Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report for a discussion of the transaction and
gain calculation.
Trading income of $6.0 million was recognized by the Company in the first quarter of 2010 compared
to income of $8.7 million in the first quarter of 2009. Lower trading income in 2010 resulted
primarily from a smaller increase in market value of certain collateralized mortgage obligations
held in trading in the first quarter of 2010 as compared to the same period in the prior year. The
Company purchased these securities at a significant discount in the first quarter of 2009. These
securities have increased in value since their purchase due to market spreads tightening, increased
mortgage prepayments due to the favorable mortgage rate environment and lower than projected
default rates.
Other non-interest income for the first quarter of 2010 totaled $3.6 million, compared to $4.3
million in the first quarter of 2009. Fees from certain covered call option transactions decreased
by $1.7 million in the first quarter of 2010 as compared to the same period in
the prior year. Historically, compression in the net interest margin was effectively offset, as
has consistently been the case, by the Companys covered call strategy. In the first quarter of
2010 management chose to engage in limited covered call option activity resulting in revenue of
$289,000.
51
Non-interest Expense
Non-interest expense for the first quarter of 2010 totaled $84.0 million and increased
approximately $7.0 million, or 9%, from the first quarter 2009 total of $77.0 million. The
following table presents non-interest expense by category for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
$ |
49,072 |
|
|
$ |
44,820 |
|
|
|
4,252 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
3,896 |
|
|
|
3,938 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Occupancy, net |
|
|
6,230 |
|
|
|
6,190 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
3,407 |
|
|
|
3,136 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Advertising and marketing |
|
|
1,314 |
|
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
3,107 |
|
|
|
2,883 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Amortization of other intangible assets |
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
FDIC insurance |
|
|
3,809 |
|
|
|
3,013 |
|
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
OREO expenses, net |
|
|
1,337 |
|
|
|
2,356 |
|
|
|
(1,019 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions 3rd party brokers |
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Postage |
|
|
1,110 |
|
|
|
1,180 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Stationery and supplies |
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
768 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
8,317 |
|
|
|
6,192 |
|
|
|
2,125 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other |
|
|
11,121 |
|
|
|
8,844 |
|
|
|
2,277 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
$ |
83,938 |
|
|
$ |
76,962 |
|
|
|
6,976 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits comprised 58% of total non-interest expense in the first
quarter of 2010 and 2009. Salaries and employee benefits expense increased $4.3 million, or 9%,
in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the first quarter of 2009 primarily as a result of the
growth in the commercial lending staff throughout the Company, the salaries and benefits related to
the staff associated with the life insurance premium finance portfolio acquired in the third
quarter of 2009 and increases in base compensation, partially offset by lower commission and
incentive compensation expenses related to mortgage banking activities as a result of lower
mortgage loan origination volumes.
Equipment expense, which includes furniture, equipment and computer software depreciation and
repairs and maintenance costs, totaled $3.9 million for the first quarter of 2010 representing a 1%
decrease compared to the same period of 2009.
Occupancy expense for the first quarter of 2010 was $6.2 million, an increase of $40,000, or 1%,
compared to the same period of 2009. Occupancy expense includes depreciation on premises, real
estate taxes, utilities, and maintenance of premises, as well as net rent expense for leased
premises.
Data processing expenses totaled $3.4 million in the first quarter of 2010, representing an
increase of $271,000, or 9%, compared to the first quarter of 2009. The increase is primarily due
to the overall growth of loan and deposit accounts.
Professional fees include legal, audit and tax fees, external loan review costs and normal
regulatory exam assessments. Professional fees for the first quarter of 2010 were $3.1 million, an
increase of $224,000, or 8%, compared to the same period in 2009. These increases are primarily a
result of increased legal costs related to non-performing assets.
FDIC insurance totaled $3.8 million in the first quarter of 2010, an increase of $796,000 compared
to $3.0 million in the first quarter of 2009. The increase in FDIC insurance rates is the result
of growth in the assessable deposit base. Additionally, on December 30, 2009, FDIC insured
institutions were required to prepay 13 quarters of estimated deposit insurance premiums.
Therefore, the Company prepaid approximately $59.8 million of estimated deposit insurance premiums
and recorded this amount as an asset on its Consolidated Statement of Condition. This prepayment
is being expensed over the three year assessment period.
OREO expenses include all costs related with obtaining, maintaining and selling of other real
estate owned properties. This expense totaled $1.3 million in the first quarter of 2010, a
decrease of $1.0 million compared to $2.4 million in the first quarter of 2009. The decrease in
OREO expenses primarily relate to lower valuation adjustments and losses on the sale of properties
in the first quarter of 2010 as compared to the prior year. In the first quarter of 2010, $445,000
of net losses on sales and valuation adjustments were recognized as compared to $2.0 million of net
losses on sales and valuation adjustments in the first quarter of 2009.
Miscellaneous expense includes expenses such as ATM expenses, correspondent bank charges,
directors fees, telephone, travel and entertainment, corporate insurance, dues and subscriptions,
problem loan expenses and lending origination costs that are not deferred. Miscellaneous expenses
in the first quarter of 2010 increased $2.1 million, or 34%, compared to the same period in the
prior year. The
increase in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in the prior year is primarily
attributable to a higher level of problem
52
loan expenses and the general growth in the Companys
business.
Income Taxes
The Company recorded income tax expense of $9.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010,
compared to $3.4 million for same period of 2009. The effective tax rates were 37.2% and 34.9% for
the first three months of 2010 and 2009, respectively. The higher effective tax rate in the first
quarter of 2010 is primarily a result of a higher level of pretax net income in the period relative
to tax-advantaged income as compared to the first quarter of 2009.
Operating Segment Results
As described in Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Companys operations consist
of three primary segments: community banking, specialty finance and wealth management. The
Companys profitability is primarily dependent on the net interest income, provision for credit
losses, non-interest income and operating expenses of its community banking segment. The net
interest income of the community banking segment includes interest income and related interest
costs from portfolio loans that were purchased from the specialty finance segment. For purposes of
internal segment profitability analysis, management reviews the results of its specialty finance
segment as if all loans originated and sold to the community banking segment were retained within
that segments operations.
Similarly, for purposes of analyzing the contribution from the wealth management segment,
management allocates a portion of the net interest income earned by the community banking segment
on deposit balances of customers of the wealth management segment to the wealth management segment.
(See wealth management deposits discussion in the Deposits section of this report for more
information on these deposits.)
The community banking segments net interest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 totaled
$88.0 million as compared to $61.8 million for the same period in 2009, an increase of $26.2
million, or 42%. This increase was primarily attributable to the acquisition of the life insurance
premium finance portfolio and lower costs of interest-bearing deposits. The community banking
segments non-interest income totaled $15.2 million in the first quarter of 2010, a decrease of
$8.3 million, or 35%, when compared to the first quarter of 2009 total of $23.5 million. This
decrease is primarily attributable to lower mortgage banking revenue in the first quarter of 2010.
The community banking segments net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 totaled $6.0
million, an increase of $145,000, as compared to the first quarter of 2009 net income of $5.8
million. The increase is primarily due to lower valuation adjustments and losses on the sale of
OREO.
Net interest income for the specialty finance segment totaled $14.3 million for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010, compared to $19.0 million for the same period in 2009, a decrease of $4.7 million
or 25%.
This decrease in net interest income is primarily attributable to interest expense in the first
quarter of 2010 on $600 million of secured borrowings issued by the Companys securitization
entity. Beginning on January 1, 2010, all of the assets and liabilities of the securitization
entity are included directly on the Companys Consolidated Statement of Condition. Prior to 2010,
these borrowings were recorded off-balance sheet in a qualified special purpose entity. See the
Other Funding Sources section of this report for more information on these secured borrowings. The
specialty finance segments non-interest income totaled $11.5 million for the quarter ended March
31, 2010, compared to $804,000 for the same period in 2009, an increase of $10.7 million. The
increase in non-interest income is a result of the bargain purchase gain from the acquisition of
the life insurance premium finance receivable portfolio. See Note 3 of the Financial Statements
presented under Item 1 of this report for a discussion of the bargain purchase. Net after-tax
profit of the specialty finance segment totaled $9.0 million and $8.2 million for the quarters
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 respectively.
The wealth management segment reported net interest income of $2.5 million for the first quarter of
2010 compared to $3.2 million in the same quarter of 2009. Net interest income is comprised of the
net interest earned on brokerage customer receivables at WHI and an allocation of the net interest
income earned by the community banking segment on non-interest bearing and interest-bearing wealth
management customer account balances on deposit at the banks (wealth management deposits). The
allocated net interest income included in this segments profitability was $2.4 million ($1.5
million after tax) in the first quarter of 2010 compared to $3.1 million ($1.9 million after tax)
in the first quarter of 2009. This segment recorded non-interest income of $10.7 million for the
first quarter of 2010 compared to $8.0 million for the first quarter of 2009. Increased asset
valuations due to equity market improvements have helped revenue growth from trust and asset
management activities. Additionally, the improvement in the equity markets overall have lead to the
increase of the brokerage component of wealth management revenue as customer trading activity has
increased. The wealth management segments net income totaled $1.1 million for the first quarters
of 2010 and 2009.
53
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Total assets were $12.8 billion at March 31, 2010, representing an increase of $2.0 billion, or
19%, when compared to March 31, 2009 and approximately $624.4 million, or 21% on an annualized
basis, when compared to December 31, 2009. Total funding, which includes deposits, all notes and
advances, including the junior subordinated debentures, was $11.3 billion at March 31, 2010, $9.6
billion at March 31, 2009 and $10.9 billion at December 31, 2009. See Notes 5, 6, 10, 11 and 12 of
the Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report for additional period-end detail on
the Companys interest-earning assets and funding liabilities.
Interest-Earning Assets
The following table sets forth, by category, the composition of average earning asset balances and
the relative percentage of total average earning assets for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real estate |
|
$ |
5,014,976 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
|
$ |
5,071,643 |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
|
$ |
4,826,474 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
Home equity |
|
|
928,990 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
928,542 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
909,948 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Residential real estate (1) |
|
|
503,804 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
544,406 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
451,127 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Premium finance receivables |
|
|
2,499,896 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
1,838,483 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1,410,727 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
90,772 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
106,569 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
165,143 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Other loans |
|
|
111,640 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
114,363 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
161,430 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of unearned income (2) |
|
$ |
9,150,078 |
|
|
|
79 |
% |
|
$ |
8,604,006 |
|
|
|
77 |
% |
|
$ |
7,924,849 |
|
|
|
81 |
% |
Liquidity management assets (3) |
|
|
2,384,122 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
2,569,584 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
1,839,161 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Other earning assets (4) |
|
|
26,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average earning assets |
|
$ |
11,560,469 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
11,199,757 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
9,786,138 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average assets |
|
$ |
12,590,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,189,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,724,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average earning assets to total average assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes mortgage loans held-for-sale |
|
(2) |
|
Includes non-accrual loans |
|
(3) |
|
Includes available-for-sale securities, interest earning deposits with banks and federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements |
|
(4) |
|
Includes brokerage customer receivables and trading account securities |
Total average earning assets for the first quarter of 2010 increased $1.8 billion, or 18%, to $11.6
billion, compared to the first quarter of 2009, and increased $360.7 million, or 13% on an
annualized basis, compared to the fourth quarter of 2009. The ratio of total average earning assets
as a percent of total average assets was 92% at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, up slightly
from 91% in the first quarter of 2009.
Total average loans during the first quarter of 2010 increased $1.2 billion, or 15%, over the
previous year first quarter. Approximately $1.1 billion of this increase relates to the premium
finance receivables portfolio. This increase primarily relates to the purchase of a portfolio of
domestic life insurance premium finance loans in the third and fourth quarters of 2009 with an
aggregate fair value of $910.9 million. The $661.4 million increase in average premium finance
receivables from the fourth quarter of 2009 to the first quarter of 2010 is primarily due to the
third quarter 2009 securitization transaction that is now accounted for as a secured borrowing.
During the third quarter of 2009, FIFC initially sold $695 million in commercial premium finance
receivables to our indirect subsidiary, FIFC Premium Funding I, LLC, which in turn sold $600
million in aggregate principal amount of notes backed by such commercial premium finance
receivables in a securitization transaction sponsored by FIFC. Subsequent to December 31, 2009,
this securitization transaction is accounted for as a secured borrowing and the securitization
entity is treated as a consolidated subsidiary of the Company under ASC 810 and ASC 860. See Note 2
to the financial statements of Item 1 of this report for a discussion of changes to the accounting
for transfers and servicing of financial assets, including the elimination of qualifying SPEs.
Accordingly, beginning on January 1, 2010, all of the assets and liabilities of the securitization
entity are included directly on the Companys Consolidated Statement of Condition.
Under the terms of the securitization, FIFC has the right, but not the obligation, to securitize
additional receivables in the future and is responsible for the servicing, administration and
collection of securitized receivables and related security in accordance with FIFCs credit and
collection policy. FIFCs obligations under the securitization are subject to customary covenants,
including the obligation to file and amend financing statements; the obligation to pay costs and
expenses; the obligation to indemnify other parties for its breach or failure to perform; the
obligation to defend the right, title and interest of the transferee of the conveyed receivables
against third party claims; the obligation to repurchase the securitized receivables if certain
representations fail to be true and correct and the
receivables are materially and adversely affected thereby; the obligation to maintain its corporate
existence and licenses to operate; and the obligation to qualify the securitized notes under the
securities laws. In the event of a default by FIFC under certain of these
54
obligations, the ability
to add loans to securitization facility could terminate.
Indirect consumer loans are comprised primarily of automobile loans originated at Hinsdale Bank.
These loans are financed from networks of unaffiliated automobile dealers located throughout the
Chicago metropolitan area with which the Company had established relationships. The risks
associated with the Companys portfolios are diversified among many individual borrowers. Like
other consumer loans, the indirect consumer loans are subject to the Banks established credit
standards. Management regards substantially all of these loans as prime quality loans. In the third
quarter of 2008, the Company ceased the origination of indirect automobile loans through Hinsdale
Bank. This niche business served the Company well over the past twelve years in helping de novo
banks quickly and profitably, grow into their physical structures. Competitive pricing pressures
significantly reduced the long-term potential profitably of this niche business. Given the current
economic environment, the retirement of the founder of this niche business and the Companys belief
that interest rates may rise over the longer-term, exiting the origination of this business was
deemed to be in the best interest of the Company. The Company continues to service its existing
portfolio during the duration of the credits.
Other loans represent a wide variety of personal and consumer loans to individuals as well as
high-yielding short-term accounts receivable financing to clients in the temporary staffing
industry located throughout the United States. Consumer loans generally have shorter terms and
higher interest rates than mortgage loans but generally involve more credit risk due to the type
and nature of the collateral. Additionally, short-term accounts receivable financing may also
involve greater credit risks than generally associated with the loan portfolios of more traditional
community banks depending on the marketability of the collateral. Lower activity from existing
clients and slower growth in new customer relationships due to sluggish economic conditions have
led to a decrease in short-term accounts receivable financing in the last few years.
Liquidity management assets include available-for-sale securities, interest earning deposits with
banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements. The balances of these
assets can fluctuate based on managements ongoing effort to manage liquidity and for asset
liability management purposes.
Other earning assets include brokerage customer receivables and trading account securities at WHI.
Trading securities are also held at the Wintrust corporate level. In the normal course of business,
WHI activities involve the execution, settlement, and financing of various securities transactions.
WHIs customer securities activities are transacted on either a cash or margin basis. In margin
transactions, WHI, under an agreement with the out-sourced securities firm, extends credit to its
customers, subject to various regulatory and internal margin requirements, collateralized by cash
and securities in customers accounts. In connection with these activities, WHI executes and the
out-sourced firm clears customer transactions relating to the sale of securities not yet purchased,
substantially all of which are transacted on a margin basis subject to individual exchange
regulations. Such transactions may expose WHI to off-balance-sheet risk, particularly in volatile
trading markets, in the event margin requirements are not sufficient to fully cover losses that
customers may incur. In the event a customer fails to satisfy its obligations, WHI under an
agreement with the outsourced securities firm, may be required to purchase or sell financial
instruments at prevailing market prices to fulfill the customers obligations. WHI seeks to control
the risks associated with its customers activities by requiring customers to maintain margin
collateral in compliance with various regulatory and internal guidelines. WHI monitors required
margin levels daily and, pursuant to such guidelines, requires customers to deposit additional
collateral or to reduce positions when necessary.
55
Deposits
Total deposits at March 31, 2010, were $9.7 billion and increased $1.1 billion, or 13%, compared to
total deposits at March 31, 2009. See Note 10 to the financial statements of Item 1 of this report
for a summary of period end deposit balances.
The following table sets forth, by category, the maturity of deposits as of March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Savings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of |
|
|
|
Bearing |
|
|
And |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturing Time |
|
|
|
And |
|
|
Money |
|
|
Wealth |
|
|
Certificates |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Certificates |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
NOW (1) |
|
|
Market (1) |
|
|
Mgt (1) (2) |
|
|
of Deposit |
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
of Deposit |
|
1 - 3 months |
|
$ |
2,320,687 |
|
|
$ |
2,145,600 |
|
|
$ |
596,919 |
|
|
$ |
1,148,766 |
|
|
$ |
6,211,972 |
|
|
|
2.04 |
% |
4 - 6 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
760,235 |
|
|
|
760,235 |
|
|
|
2.04 |
|
7 - 9 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,000 |
|
|
|
707,475 |
|
|
|
801,475 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
10 - 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
568,085 |
|
|
|
568,085 |
|
|
|
1.98 |
|
13 - 18 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
567,267 |
|
|
|
567,267 |
|
|
|
2.55 |
|
19 - 24 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,221 |
|
|
|
245,221 |
|
|
|
2.55 |
|
24+ months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570,615 |
|
|
|
570,615 |
|
|
|
2.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,320,687 |
|
|
$ |
2,145,600 |
|
|
$ |
690,919 |
|
|
$ |
4,567,664 |
|
|
$ |
9,724,870 |
|
|
|
2.22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Balances of non-contractual maturity deposits are shown
as maturing in the earliest time frame. These deposits
do not have contractual maturities and re-price in
varying degrees to changes in overall interest rates. |
|
(2) |
|
Wealth management deposit balances from unaffiliated
companies are shown maturing in the period in which the
current contractual obligation to hold these funds
matures. |
The following table sets forth, by category, the composition of average deposit balances and the
relative percentage of total average deposits for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
858,875 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
$ |
788,034 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
$ |
733,911 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
NOW accounts |
|
|
1,412,280 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
1,136,008 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1,061,271 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Wealth management deposits |
|
|
793,078 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
907,013 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
787,913 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Money market accounts |
|
|
1,545,150 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
1,375,767 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
1,243,468 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Savings accounts |
|
|
553,599 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
457,139 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
367,734 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Time certificates of deposit |
|
|
4,513,904 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
4,543,154 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
4,287,493 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average deposits |
|
$ |
9,676,886 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
9,207,115 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
8,481,790 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average deposits for the first quarter of 2010 were $9.7 billion, an increase of $1.2
billion, or 14%, from the first quarter of 2009. Each deposit category increased, but the largest
increases, in terms of average balances and percentage increases, were in the now accounts and
money market accounts.
Wealth management deposits are funds from the brokerage customers of Wayne Hummer Investments , the
trust and asset management customers of Wayne Hummer Trust Company and brokerage customers from
unaffiliated companies which have been placed into deposit accounts of the banks (wealth
management deposits in the table above). Consistent with reasonable interest rate risk parameters,
the funds have generally been invested in loan production of the banks as well as other investments
suitable for banks.
56
Other Funding Sources
Although deposits are the Companys primary source of funding its interest-earning assets, the
Companys ability to manage the types and terms of deposits is somewhat limited by customer
preferences and market competition. As a result, in addition to deposits and the issuance of equity
securities and the retention of earnings, the Company uses several other sources to fund its asset
base. These sources include short-term borrowings, notes payable, Federal Home Loan Bank advances,
subordinated debt, secured borrowings and junior subordinated debentures. The Company evaluates the
terms and unique characteristics of each source, as well as its asset-liability management
position, in determining the use of such funding sources.
Average total interest-bearing funding, from sources other than deposits and including junior
subordinated debentures, totaled $1.6 billion in the first quarter of 2010 compared to $1.1 billion
in the first quarter of 2009.
The following table sets forth, by category, the composition of average other funding sources for
the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Notes payable |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
429,195 |
|
|
|
432,028 |
|
|
|
435,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other borrowings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,039 |
|
Securities sold under repurchase agreements and other |
|
|
224,771 |
|
|
|
233,754 |
|
|
|
296,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other borrowings |
|
|
224,919 |
|
|
|
233,754 |
|
|
|
300,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured borrowings owed to securitization investors |
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
63,261 |
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
249,493 |
|
|
|
249,493 |
|
|
|
249,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other funding sources |
|
$ |
1,564,607 |
|
|
$ |
979,536 |
|
|
$ |
1,057,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable balances represent the balances on a credit agreement with an unaffiliated bank.
This credit facility is available for corporate purposes such as to provide capital to fund growth
at existing bank subsidiaries, possible future acquisitions and for other general corporate
matters.
FHLB advances provide the banks with access to fixed rate funds which are useful in mitigating
interest rate risk and achieving an acceptable interest rate spread on fixed rate loans or
securities.
Securities sold under repurchase agreements represent sweep accounts for certain customers in
connection with master repurchase agreements at the banks and short-term borrowings from brokers.
This funding category fluctuates based on customer preferences and daily liquidity needs of the
banks, their customers and the banks operating subsidiaries.
The $600 million average balance of secured borrowings in the first quarter of 2010 represents the
consolidation of a QSPE that was previously accounted for as an off-balance sheet securitization
transaction sponsored by FIFC. Pursuant to ASC 810 and ASC 860, effective January 1, 2010, the
QSPE is accounted for as a consolidated subsidiary of the Company. In connection with the
securitization, premium finance receivables commercial were transferred to FIFC Premium Funding,
LLC, a qualifying special purpose entity (the QSPE). Instruments issued by the QSPE included $600
million Class A notes that bear an annual interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.45% (the Notes) and have
an expected average term of 2.93 years with any unpaid balance due and payable in full on February
17, 2014. At the time of issuance, the Notes were eligible collateral under the Federal Reserve
Bank of New Yorks Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF). The Notes are rated Aaa by
Moodys and AAA by Standard & Poors.
The Company borrowed funds under three separate subordinated note agreements. The balances of the
notes as of March 31, 2010 were $15.0 million, $20.0 million and $25.0 million with maturity dates
in 2012, 2013 and 2015, respectively. Each subordinated note requires annual principal payments of
$5.0 million beginning in the sixth year of the note and has terms of ten years. These notes
qualify as Tier II regulatory capital.
Junior subordinated debentures were issued to nine trusts by the Company and equal the amount of
the preferred and common securities issued by the trusts. Junior subordinated debentures, subject
to certain limitations, qualify as Tier 1 capital of the Company for regulatory purposes. The
amount of junior subordinated debentures and certain other capital elements in excess of those
certain limitations could be included in Tier 2 capital, subject to restrictions. Interest expense
on these debentures is deductible for tax purposes, resulting in a cost-efficient form of
regulatory capital.
See Notes 8, 11 and 12 of the Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report for
details of period end balances and other information for these various funding sources. There were
no material changes outside the ordinary course of business in the Companys contractual
obligations during the first quarter of 2010 as compared to December 31, 2009.
57
Shareholders Equity
Total shareholders equity was $1.4 billion at March 31, 2010, reflecting an increase of $301.6
million since March 31, 2009 and $226.2 million since December 31, 2009. The increase from December
31, 2009 was the result of net income of $16.0 million less common stock dividends of $2.2 million
and preferred stock dividends of $4.1 million, $1.4 million credited to surplus for stock-based
compensation costs, $210.5 million from the issuance of shares of the Companys common stock
pursuant to the Companys common stock offering, $2.0 million from the issuance of shares of the
Companys common stock (and related tax benefit) pursuant to various stock compensation plans and
$3.7 million in higher net unrealized gains from available-for-sale securities and net unrealized
losses from cash flow hedges, net of tax, partially offset by a $1.1 million reduction related to
the cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings from the adoption of a new accounting method.
The following tables reflect various consolidated measures of capital as of the dates presented and
the capital guidelines established by the Federal Reserve Bank for a bank holding company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
Leverage ratio |
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
9.9 |
% |
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets |
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets |
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
Total average equity-to-total average assets * |
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
based on quarterly average balances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
Adequately |
|
Well |
|
|
Requirements |
|
Capitalized |
|
Capitalized |
Leverage ratio |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
The Companys principal sources of funds at the holding company level are dividends from its
subsidiaries, borrowings under its loan agreement with an unaffiliated bank and proceeds from the
issuances of subordinated debt, junior subordinated debentures and additional equity. Refer to
Notes 11, 12 and 17 of the Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report for further
information on these various funding sources. The issuances of subordinated debt, junior
subordinated debentures, preferred stock and additional common stock are the primary forms of
regulatory capital that are considered as the Company evaluates increasing its capital position.
Management is committed to maintaining the Companys capital levels above the Well Capitalized
levels established by the Federal Reserve for bank holding companies.
The Companys Board of Directors approved the first semi-annual dividend on the Companys common
stock in January 2000 and has continued to approve semi-annual dividends since that time; however,
our ability to declare a dividend is limited by our financial condition, the terms of our 8.00%
non-cumulative perpetual convertible preferred stock, Series A, the terms of our fixed rate
cumulative perpetual preferred stock, Series B (the Series B Preferred Stock) and by the terms of
our credit agreement. In January 2010, Wintrust declared a semi-annual cash dividend of $0.09 per
common share. In January and July 2009, Wintrust declared semi-annual cash dividends of $0.18 and
$0.09 per common share, respectively.
See Note 17 of the Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report for details on the
Companys issuance of common stock in March 2010, as well as preferred stock in August 2008 through
a private transaction and also in December 2008 under the CPP.
Participation in the CPP creates restrictions upon the Companys ability to increase dividends on
its common stock or to repurchase its common stock until three years have elapsed, unless (i) all
of the preferred stock issued to the Treasury are redeemed, (ii) all of the preferred stock issued
to the Treasury have been transferred to third parties, or (iii) the Company receives the consent
of the Treasury. In addition, the Treasury has the right to appoint two additional directors to the
Wintrust board if the Company misses dividend payments for six dividend periods, whether or not
consecutive, on the Series B Preferred Stock. Pursuant to the terms of the certificate of
designations creating the CPP preferred stock, the Companys board will be automatically expanded
to include such directors, upon the occurrence of the foregoing conditions.
Taking into account the limitation on the payment of dividends in connection with the Series B
Preferred Stock, the final determination of timing, amount and payment of dividends is at the
discretion of the Companys Board of Directors and will depend on the Companys earnings, financial
condition, capital requirements and other relevant factors. Additionally, the payment of dividends
is also subject to statutory restrictions and restrictions arising under the terms of the Companys
Trust Preferred Securities offerings and under certain financial covenants in the Companys
revolving line of credit. Under the terms of the Companys
revolving credit facility entered into on October 30, 2009, the Company is prohibited from paying
dividends on any equity interests,
58
including its common stock and preferred stock, if such payments would cause the Company to be in
default under its credit facility.
LOAN PORTFOLIO AND ASSET QUALITY
Loan Portfolio
The following table shows the Companys loan portfolio by category for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Total |
|
Commercial and commercial real estate |
|
$ |
5,083,052 |
|
|
|
56 |
% |
|
$ |
5,039,906 |
|
|
|
60 |
% |
|
$ |
4,933,355 |
|
|
|
63 |
% |
Home equity |
|
|
924,993 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
930,482 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
920,412 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
322,984 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
306,296 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
280,808 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Premium finance receivables commercial |
|
|
1,317,822 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
730,144 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1,287,261 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Premium finance receivables life insurance |
|
|
1,233,573 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1,197,893 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
130,895 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
83,136 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
98,134 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
154,257 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Consumer and other loans |
|
|
105,002 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
108,916 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
134,459 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of unearned income |
|
$ |
9,070,562 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
8,411,771 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
7,841,447 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real estate loans. Our commercial and commercial real estate loan
portfolios are comprised primarily of commercial real estate loans and lines of credit for working
capital purposes. The Company enhanced its loan classification system and began presenting data
regarding commercial and commercial real estate on a disaggregated basis in the third quarter of
2009. Prior to that time, the Company did not gather information disaggregated by these loan
category types. The table below sets forth information regarding the types, amounts and performance
of our loans within these portfolios as of March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>90 Days |
|
Allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
Non- |
|
Past Due and |
|
for Loan Losses |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance |
|
Total Loans |
|
accrual |
|
still accruing |
|
Allocation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
1,403,702 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
% |
|
$ |
14,218 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
23,689 |
|
Franchise |
|
|
131,555 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,097 |
|
Mortgage warehouse lines of credit |
|
|
89,813 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,216 |
|
Community Advantage homeowner
associations |
|
|
66,590 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161 |
|
Aircraft |
|
|
41,148 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170 |
|
Other |
|
|
17,234 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial |
|
$ |
1,750,042 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
% |
|
$ |
15,331 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
28,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential construction |
|
$ |
146,351 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
$ |
13,240 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,783 |
|
Commercial construction |
|
|
298,313 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
16,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,532 |
|
Land |
|
|
315,483 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
32,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,749 |
|
Office |
|
|
489,066 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
2,559 |
|
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
5,477 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
455,155 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
2,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,139 |
|
Retail |
|
|
456,712 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
2,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,085 |
|
Multi-family |
|
|
249,596 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
3,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,026 |
|
Mixed use and other |
|
|
922,334 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
9,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,461 |
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial Real Estate Loans |
|
$ |
3,333,010 |
|
|
|
36.8 |
% |
|
$ |
82,389 |
|
|
$ |
1,195 |
|
|
$ |
50,252 |
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial and Commercial
Real Estate |
|
$ |
5,083,052 |
|
|
|
56.1 |
% |
|
$ |
97,720 |
|
|
$ |
1,195 |
|
|
$ |
78,662 |
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estatecollateral
location by state: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois |
|
$ |
2,677,819 |
|
|
|
80.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin |
|
|
374,707 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total primary markets |
|
$ |
3,052,526 |
|
|
|
91.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona |
|
|
48,499 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indiana |
|
|
43,104 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida |
|
|
67,754 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (no individual state greater
than 0.9%) |
|
|
121,127 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,333,010 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
Our commercial real estate loans are generally secured by a first mortgage lien and assignment of rents on the
property. Since most of our bank branches are located in the Chicago, Illinois metropolitan area
and southeastern Wisconsin, 91.5% of our commercial real estate loan portfolio is located in this
region. Commercial real estate market conditions continued to be under stress in 2010, and we
expect this trend to continue. As of March 31, 2010, our allowance for loan losses related to this
portfolio is $50.3 million.
We make commercial loans for many purposes, including: working capital lines, which are generally
renewable annually and supported by business assets, personal guarantees and additional collateral;
loans to condominium and homeowner associations originated through Barrington Banks Community
Advantage program; small aircraft financing, an earning asset niche developed at Crystal Lake Bank;
and franchise lending at Lake Forest Bank. Commercial business lending is generally considered to
involve a higher degree of risk than traditional consumer bank lending, and as a result of the
economic recession, allowance for loan losses in our commercial loan portfolio is $28.4 million as
of March 31, 2010.
The Company also participates in mortgage warehouse lending by providing interim funding to
unaffiliated mortgage bankers to finance residential mortgages originated by such bankers for sale
into the secondary market. The Companys loans to the mortgage bankers are secured by the business
assets of the mortgage companies as well as the specific mortgage loans funded by the Company,
after they have been pre-approved for purchase by third party end lenders. End lender re-payments
are sent directly to the Company upon end-lenders acceptance of final loan documentation. The
Company may also provide interim financing for packages of mortgage loans on a bulk basis in
circumstances where the mortgage bankers desire to competitively bid on a number of mortgages for
sale as a package in the secondary market. Typically, the Company will serve as sole funding source
for its mortgage warehouse lending customers under short-term revolving credit agreements. Amounts
advanced with respect to any particular mortgage loan are usually required to be repaid within 21
days.
Despite poor economic conditions generally, and the particularly difficult conditions in the U.S.
residential real estate market experienced since 2008, our mortgage warehouse lending business has
expanded due to the high demand for mortgage re-financings given the historically low interest rate
environment and the fact that many of our competitors exited the market in late 2008 and early
2009. The expansion of this business has caused our mortgage warehouse lines to increase to $89.8
million as of March 31, 2010 from $68.1 million as of March 31, 2010. Additionally, our allowance
for loan losses with respect to these loans is $1.2 million as of March 31, 2010. Since the
inception of this business, the Company has not suffered any related loan losses on these loans.
Home equity loans. Our home equity loans and lines of credit are originated by each of our banks in
their local markets where we have a strong understanding of the underlying real estate value. Our
banks monitor and manage these loans, and we conduct an automated review of all home equity loans
and lines of credit at least twice per year. This review collects current credit performance for
each home equity borrower and identifies situations where the credit strength of the borrower is
declining, or where there are events that may influence repayment, such as tax liens or judgments.
Our banks use this information to manage loans that may be higher risk and to determine whether to
obtain additional credit information or updated property valuations. As a result of this work and
general market conditions, we have modified our home equity offerings and changed our policies
regarding home equity renewals and requests for subordination. In a limited number of situations,
the unused availability on home equity lines of credit was frozen.
The rates we offer on new home equity lending are based on several factors, including appraisals
and valuation due diligence, in order to reflect inherent risk, and we place additional scrutiny on
larger home equity requests. In a limited number of cases, we issue home equity credit together
with first mortgage financing, and requests for such financing are evaluated on a combined basis.
It is not our practice to advance more than 85% of the appraised value of the underlying asset,
which ratio we refer to as the loan-to-value ratio, or LTV ratio, and a majority of the credit we
previously extended, when issued, had an LTV ratio of less than 80%.
Our home equity loan portfolio has performed well in light of the deterioration in the overall
residential real estate market. The number of new home equity line of credit commitments originated
by us has decreased due to declines in housing valuations that have decreased the amount of equity
against which homeowners may borrow, and a decline in homeowners desire to use their remaining
equity as collateral. However, our total outstanding home equity loan balances have increased as a
result of new originations and borrowers exhibiting a greater propensity to borrow on their
existing lines of credit.
Residential real estate mortgages. Our residential real estate portfolio predominantly includes
one- to four-family adjustable rate mortgages that have repricing terms generally from one to three
years, construction loans to individuals and bridge financing loans for qualifying customers. As of
March 31, 2010, our residential loan portfolio totaled $323.0 million, or 4% of our total
outstanding loans.
Our adjustable rate mortgages relate to properties located principally in the Chicago metropolitan
area and southeastern Wisconsin or vacation homes owned by local residents, and may have terms
based on differing indexes. These adjustable rate mortgages are often non-agency conforming because
the outstanding balance of these loans exceeds the maximum balance that can be sold into the
secondary market. Adjustable rate mortgage loans decrease the interest rate risk we face on our
mortgage portfolio. However, this risk is not eliminated because, among other things, such loans
generally provide for periodic and lifetime limits on the interest rate adjustments. Additionally,
adjustable rate mortgages may pose a higher risk of delinquency and default because they require
60
borrowers to make larger payments when interest rates rise. To date, we have not seen a significant
elevation in delinquencies and foreclosures in our residential loan portfolio. As of March 31,
2010, $5.5 million of our residential real estate mortgages, or 1.7% of our residential real estate
loan portfolio, were classified as nonaccrual, $5.7 million were 30 to 89 days past due (1.8%) and
$311.8 million were current (96.5%). We believe that since our loan portfolio consists primarily of
locally originated loans, and since the majority of our borrowers are longer-term customers with
lower LTV ratios, we face a relatively low risk of borrower default and delinquency.
While we generally do not originate loans for our own portfolio with long-term fixed rates due to
interest rate risk considerations, we can accommodate customer requests for fixed rate loans by
originating such loans and then selling them into the secondary market, for which we receive fee
income, or by selectively retaining certain of these loans within the banks own portfolios where
they are non-agency conforming, or where the terms of the loans make them favorable to retain. A
portion of the loans we sold into the secondary market were sold to FNMA with the servicing of
those loans retained. The amount of loans serviced for FNMA as of March 31, 2010 and 2009 was
$750.4 million and $608.6 million, respectively. All other mortgage loans sold into the secondary
market were sold without the retention of servicing rights.
It is not our current practice to underwrite, and we have no plans to underwrite, subprime, Alt A,
no or little documentation loans, or option ARM loans. As of March 31, 2010, approximately $55.9
million of our mortgages consist of interest-only loans. To date, we have not participated in any
mortgage modification programs.
Premium finance receivables commercial. FIFC originated approximately $849.3 million in
commercial insurance premium finance receivables during the first quarter of 2010. FIFC makes
loans to businesses to finance the insurance premiums they pay on their commercial insurance
policies. The loans are originated by FIFC working through independent medium and large insurance
agents and brokers located throughout the United States. The insurance premiums financed are
primarily for commercial customers purchases of liability, property and casualty and other
commercial insurance.
This lending involves relatively rapid turnover of the loan portfolio and high volume of loan
originations. Because of the indirect nature of this lending and because the borrowers are located
nationwide, this segment may be more susceptible to third party fraud than relationship lending;
however, management has established various control procedures to mitigate the risks associated
with this lending. The majority of these loans are purchased by the banks in order to more fully
utilize their lending capacity as these loans generally provide the banks with higher yields than
alternative investments. Historically, FIFC originations that were not purchased by the banks were
sold to unrelated third parties with servicing retained. However, during the third quarter of 2009,
FIFC initially sold $695 million in commercial premium finance receivables to our indirect
subsidiary, FIFC Premium Funding I, LLC, which in turn sold $600 million in aggregate principal
amount of notes backed by such premium finance receivables in a securitization transaction
sponsored by FIFC. Subsequent to December 31, 2009, this securitization transaction is accounted
for as a secured borrowing and the securitization entity is treated as a consolidated subsidiary of
the Company. See Note 2 of the Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report for a
discussion of changes to the accounting for transfers and servicing of financial assets and
consolidation of variable interest entities, including the elimination of qualifying SPEs.
Accordingly, beginning on January 1, 2010, all of the assets and liabilities of the securitization
entity are included directly on the Companys Consolidated Statement of Condition.
Premium finance receivables life insurance. In 2007, FIFC began financing life insurance policy
premiums generally for high net-worth individuals. FIFC originated approximately $71.3 million in
life insurance premium finance receivables in the first quarter of 2010. These loans are originated
directly with the borrowers with assistance from life insurance carriers, independent insurance
agents, financial advisors and legal counsel. The life insurance policy is the primary form of
collateral. In addition, these loans often are secured with a letter of credit, marketable
securities or certificates of deposit. In some cases, FIFC may make a loan that has a partially
unsecured position. In 2009, FIFC expanded this niche lending business segment when it purchased a
portfolio of domestic life insurance premium finance loans for a total aggregate purchase price of
$745.9 million. See Note 3 of the Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report for
further discussion of this business combination.
Indirect consumer loans. As part of its strategy to pursue specialized earning asset niches to
augment loan generation within the Banks target markets, the Company established fixed-rate
automobile loan financing at Hinsdale Bank funded indirectly through unaffiliated automobile
dealers. The risks associated with the Companys portfolios are diversified among many individual
borrowers. Like other consumer loans, the indirect consumer loans are subject to the Banks
established credit standards. Management regards substantially all of these loans as prime quality
loans. In the third quarter of 2008, the Company ceased the origination of indirect automobile
loans through Hinsdale Bank. This niche business served the Company well over the past twelve years
in helping de novo banks quickly and profitably, grow into their physical structures. Competitive
pricing pressures significantly reduced the long-term potential profitably of this niche business.
Given the current economic environment, the retirement of the founder of this niche business and
the Companys belief that interest rates may rise over the longer-term, exiting the origination of
this business was deemed to be in the best interest of the Company. The Company continues to
service its existing portfolio during the duration of the credits.
61
Other Loans. Included in the other loan category is a wide variety of personal and consumer loans
to individuals as well as high yielding short-term accounts receivable financing to clients in the
temporary staffing industry located throughout the United States. The Banks originate consumer
loans in order to provide a wider range of financial services to their customers.
Consumer loans generally have shorter terms and higher interest rates than mortgage loans but
generally involve more credit risk than mortgage loans due to the type and nature of the
collateral. Additionally, short-term accounts receivable financing may also involve greater credit
risks than generally associated with the loan portfolios of more traditional community banks
depending on the marketability of the collateral.
Past Due Loans and Non-Performing Assets
Our ability to manage credit risk depends in large part on our ability to properly identify and
manage problem loans. To do so, we operate a credit risk rating system under which our credit
management personnel assign a credit risk rating to each loan at the time of origination and review
loans on a regular basis to determine each loans credit risk rating on a scale of 1 through 10
with higher scores indicating higher risk. The credit risk rating structure used is shown below:
|
|
|
1 Rating
|
|
Minimal Risk (Loss Potential none or extremely low) (Superior asset quality, excellent liquidity, minimal
leverage) |
|
|
|
2 Rating
|
|
Modest Risk (Loss Potential demonstrably low) (Very good asset quality and liquidity, strong leverage capacity) |
|
|
|
3 Rating
|
|
Average Risk (Loss Potential low but no longer refutable) (Mostly satisfactory asset quality and liquidity,
good leverage capacity) |
|
|
|
4 Rating
|
|
Above Average Risk (Loss Potential variable, but some potential for deterioration) (Acceptable asset quality,
little excess liquidity, modest leverage capacity) |
|
|
|
5 Rating
|
|
Management Attention Risk (Loss Potential moderate if corrective action not taken) (Generally acceptable asset
quality, somewhat strained liquidity, minimal leverage capacity) |
|
|
|
6 Rating
|
|
Special Mention (Loss Potential moderate if corrective action not taken) (Assets in this category are
currently protected, potentially weak, but not to the point of substandard classification) |
|
|
|
7 Rating
|
|
Substandard Accrual (Loss Potential distinct possibility that the bank may sustain some loss, but no
discernable impairment) (Must have well defined weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt) |
|
|
|
8 Rating
|
|
Substandard Non-accrual (Loss Potential well documented probability of loss, including potential impairment)
(Must have well defined weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt) |
|
|
|
9 Rating
|
|
Doubtful (Loss Potential extremely high) (These assets have all the weaknesses in those classified
substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the
basis of current existing facts, conditions, and values, highly improbable) |
|
|
|
10 Rating
|
|
Loss (fully charged-off) (Loans in this category are considered full uncollectible.) |
In the first quarter of 2010, the Company modified its credit risk rating scale to the above 1
through 10 risk ratings. Prior to this, the Company employed a 1 through 9 credit risk rating
scale. The main change is that the Company now has two separate credit risk ratings for
Substandard loans. They are Substandard Accrual (credit risk rating 7) and Substandard
Nonaccrual (credit risk rating 8). Previously, there was only one risk rating for loans classified
as Substandard. This change allows the Company to better monitor credit risk of the portfolio.
Each loan officer is responsible for monitoring his or her loan portfolio, recommending a credit
risk rating for each loan in his or her portfolio and ensuring the credit risk ratings are
appropriate. These credit risk ratings are then ratified by the banks chief credit officer or the
directors loan committee. Credit risk ratings are determined by evaluating a number of factors
including, a borrowers financial strength, cash flow coverage, collateral protection and
guarantees. A third party loan review firm independently reviews a significant portion of the loan
portfolio at each of the Companys subsidiary banks to evaluate the appropriateness of the
management-assigned credit risk ratings. These ratings are subject to further review at each of our
bank subsidiaries by the applicable regulatory authority, including the Federal Reserve Bank of
Chicago, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the State of Illinois and the State of
62
Wisconsin and our internal audit staff.
The Companys Problem Loan Reporting system automatically includes all loans with credit risk
ratings of 6 through 9. This system is designed to provide an on-going detailed tracking mechanism
for each problem loan. Once management determines that a loan has deteriorated to a point where it
has a credit risk rating of 6 or worse, the Companys Managed Asset Division performs an overall
credit and collateral review. As part of this review, all underlying collateral is identified, the
valuation methodology analyzed and tracked. As a result of this initial review by the Companys
Managed Asset Division, the credit risk rating is reviewed and a portion of the outstanding loan
balance may be deemed uncollectible or an impairment reserve may be established. The Companys
impairment analysis utilizes an independent re-appraisal of the collateral (unless such a
third-party evaluation is not possible due to the unique nature of the collateral, such as a
closely-held business or thinly traded securities). In the case of commercial real estate
collateral, an independent third party appraisal is ordered by the Companys Real Estate Services
Group to determine if there has been any change in the underlying collateral value. These
independent appraisals are reviewed by the Real Estate Services Group and often by independent
third party valuation experts and may be adjusted depending upon market conditions. An appraisal is
ordered at least once a year for these loans, or more often if market conditions dictate. In the
event that the underlying value of the collateral cannot be easily determined, a detailed valuation
methodology is prepared by the Managed Asset Division. A summary of this analysis is provided to
the directors loan committee of the bank which originated the credit for approval of a charge-off,
if necessary.
Through the credit risk rating process, loans are reviewed to determine if they are performing in
accordance with the original contractual terms. If the borrower has failed to comply with the
original contractual terms, further action may be required by the Company, including a downgrade in
the credit risk rating, movement to non-accrual status, a charge-off or the establishment of a
specific impairment reserve. In the event a collateral shortfall is identified during the credit
review process, the Company will work with the borrower for a principal reduction and/or a pledge
of additional collateral and/or additional guarantees. In the event that these options are not
available, the loan may be subject to a downgrade of the credit risk rating. If we determine that a
loan amount or portion thereof, is uncollectible the loans credit risk rating is immediately
downgraded to an 8 or 9 and the uncollectible amount is charged-off. Any loan that has a partial
charge-off continues to be assigned a credit risk rating of an 8 or 9 for the duration of time that
a balance remains outstanding. The Managed Asset Division undertakes a thorough and ongoing
analysis to determine if additional impairment and/or charge-offs are appropriate and to begin a
workout plan for the credit to minimize actual losses.
If, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to
collect all amounts due to it according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement, a specific
impairment reserve is established. In determining the appropriate charge-off for
collateral-dependent loans, the Company considers the results of appraisals for the associated
collateral. As a result of the loan-by-loan nature of the Companys review process, no significant
time lapses have occurred during the review process.
63
The following table sets forth Wintrusts non-performing assets at the dates indicated:
Non-performing Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans past due greater than 90 days and still accruing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real-estate |
|
$ |
1,195 |
|
|
$ |
561 |
|
|
$ |
4,677 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
726 |
|
Residential real-estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
|
|
Premium finance receivables commercial |
|
|
7,479 |
|
|
|
6,271 |
|
|
|
9,722 |
|
Premium finance receivables life insurance |
|
|
5,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indirect consumer |
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
Consumer and other |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total past due greater than 90 days and still accruing |
|
|
14,830 |
|
|
|
7,800 |
|
|
|
16,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real-estate |
|
|
97,720 |
|
|
|
97,148 |
|
|
|
136,306 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
7,730 |
|
|
|
8,883 |
|
|
|
4,250 |
|
Residential real-estate |
|
|
5,460 |
|
|
|
3,779 |
|
|
|
4,959 |
|
Premium finance receivables commercial |
|
|
14,106 |
|
|
|
11,878 |
|
|
|
12,694 |
|
Premium finance receivables life insurance |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
|
|
Indirect consumer |
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
1,084 |
|
Consumer and other |
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual |
|
|
126,130 |
|
|
|
124,004 |
|
|
|
159,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real-estate |
|
|
98,915 |
|
|
|
97,709 |
|
|
|
140,983 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
7,751 |
|
|
|
8,883 |
|
|
|
4,976 |
|
Residential real-estate |
|
|
5,460 |
|
|
|
4,191 |
|
|
|
4,959 |
|
Premium finance receivables commercial |
|
|
21,585 |
|
|
|
18,149 |
|
|
|
22,416 |
|
Premium finance receivables life insurance |
|
|
5,523 |
|
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
|
|
Indirect consumer |
|
|
1,280 |
|
|
|
1,456 |
|
|
|
2,160 |
|
Consumer and other |
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
$ |
140,960 |
|
|
|
131,804 |
|
|
$ |
175,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans by category as a percent of its own
respective categorys period-end balance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real-estate |
|
|
1.95 |
% |
|
|
1.94 |
% |
|
|
2.86 |
% |
Home equity |
|
|
0.84 |
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
|
0.54 |
|
Residential real-estate |
|
|
1.69 |
|
|
|
1.37 |
|
|
|
1.77 |
|
Premium finance receivables commercial |
|
|
1.64 |
|
|
|
2.49 |
|
|
|
1.74 |
|
Premium finance receivables life insurance |
|
|
0.45 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
Indirect consumer |
|
|
1.54 |
|
|
|
1.48 |
|
|
|
1.40 |
|
Consumer and other |
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
|
1.55 |
% |
|
|
1.57 |
% |
|
|
2.24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total
non-performing loans |
|
|
72.64 |
% |
|
|
74.56 |
% |
|
|
42.22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
Non-performing Commercial and Commercial Real-Estate
The commercial and commercial real estate non-performing loan category totaled $98.9 million
as of March 31, 2010 compared to $97.7 million as of December 31, 2009 and $141.0 million as of
March 31, 2009.
Management is pursuing the resolution of all credits in this category. At this time,
management believes reserves are adequate to absorb inherent losses that may occur upon the
ultimate resolution of these credits.
Non-performing Residential Real Estate and Home Equity
The non-performing residential real estate and home equity loans totaled $13.2 million as of March
31, 2010. The balance increased $137,000 from December 31, 2009 and increased $3.3 million from
March 31, 2009. The March 31, 2010 non-performing balance is comprised of $5.5 million of
residential real estate (21 individual credits) and $7.8 million of home equity loans (18
individual credits). On average, this is approximately three non-performing residential real
estate loans and home equity loans per chartered bank within the Company. The Company believes
control and collection of these loans is very manageable. At this time, management believes
reserves are adequate to absorb inherent losses that may occur upon the ultimate resolution of
these credits.
Non-performing Commercial Premium Finance Receivables
The table below presents the level of non-performing property and casualty premium finance
receivables as of March 31, 2010 and 2009, and the amount of net charge-offs for the quarters then
ended.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Non-performing premium finance receivables commercial |
|
$ |
21,585 |
|
|
$ |
22,416 |
|
as a percent of premium finance receivables commercial outstanding |
|
|
1.64 |
% |
|
|
1.74 |
% |
|
Net charge-offs of premium finance receivables commercial |
|
$ |
1,704 |
|
|
$ |
1,210 |
|
annualized as a percent of average premium finance receivables
commercial |
|
|
0.54 |
% |
|
|
0.37 |
% |
Fluctuations in this category may occur due to timing and nature of account collections from
insurance carriers. The Companys underwriting standards, regardless of the condition of the
economy, have remained consistent. We anticipate that net charge-offs and non-performing asset
levels in the near term will continue to be at levels that are within acceptable operating ranges
for this category of loans. Management is comfortable with administering the collections at this
level of non-performing property and casualty premium finance receivables and believes reserves are
adequate to absorb inherent losses that may occur upon the ultimate resolution of these credits.
Non-performing Indirect Consumer Loans
Total non-performing indirect consumer loans were $1.3 million at March 31, 2010, compared to $1.5
million at December 31, 2009 and $2.2 million at March 31, 2009. The ratio of these non-performing
loans to total indirect consumer loans was 1.54% at March 31, 2010 compared to 1.48% at December
31, 2009 and 1.40% at March 31, 2009. As noted in the Allowance for Credit Losses table, net
charge-offs as a percent of total indirect consumer loans were 1.00% for the quarter ended March
31, 2010 compared to 0.81% in the same period in 2009. The indirect consumer loan portfolio has
decreased 46% since March 31, 2009 to a balance of $83.1 million at March 31, 2010.
The following table shows the current aging status of the Companys entire loan portfolio. Only
1.6% of the entire portfolio is in a non-performing (non-accrual or greater than 90 days past due
and still accruing interest) with only 1.6% either one or two payments past due. In total, 96.8% of
the Companys total loan portfolio is current according to the original contractual terms of the
loan agreements.
65
The tables below show the aging of the Companys loan portfolio at March 31, 2010 and December
31, 2009:
As of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
90+ days and |
|
|
60-89 days |
|
|
30-59 days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Accrual |
|
|
still accruing |
|
|
past due |
|
|
past due |
|
|
Current |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
Loan Balances: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
15,331 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,114 |
|
|
$ |
22,106 |
|
|
$ |
1,706,491 |
|
|
$ |
1,750,042 |
|
Commercial real-estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential construction |
|
|
13,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,298 |
|
|
|
1,726 |
|
|
|
128,087 |
|
|
|
146,351 |
|
Commercial construction |
|
|
16,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,101 |
|
|
|
3,911 |
|
|
|
276,385 |
|
|
|
298,313 |
|
Land |
|
|
32,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,421 |
|
|
|
7,389 |
|
|
|
271,250 |
|
|
|
315,483 |
|
Office |
|
|
2,559 |
|
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
2,960 |
|
|
|
2,566 |
|
|
|
479,786 |
|
|
|
489,066 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
2,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
4,990 |
|
|
|
447,492 |
|
|
|
455,155 |
|
Retail |
|
|
2,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,783 |
|
|
|
6,772 |
|
|
|
442,847 |
|
|
|
456,712 |
|
Multi-family |
|
|
3,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,546 |
|
|
|
10,591 |
|
|
|
233,904 |
|
|
|
249,596 |
|
Mixed use and other |
|
|
9,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,409 |
|
|
|
14,168 |
|
|
|
890,514 |
|
|
|
922,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial real-estate |
|
|
82,389 |
|
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
27,048 |
|
|
|
52,113 |
|
|
|
3,170,265 |
|
|
|
3,333,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and
commercial real-estate |
|
|
97,720 |
|
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
33,162 |
|
|
|
74,219 |
|
|
|
4,876,756 |
|
|
|
5,083,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
7,730 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
2,019 |
|
|
|
2,925 |
|
|
|
912,298 |
|
|
|
924,993 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
5,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
5,541 |
|
|
|
311,805 |
|
|
|
322,984 |
|
Premium finance receivables
commercial |
|
|
14,106 |
|
|
|
7,479 |
|
|
|
5,109 |
|
|
|
15,870 |
|
|
|
1,275,258 |
|
|
|
1,317,822 |
|
Premium finance receivables
life insurance |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
5,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,076 |
|
|
|
1,225,974 |
|
|
|
1,233,573 |
|
Indirect consumer |
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
1,203 |
|
|
|
80,228 |
|
|
|
83,136 |
|
Consumer and other |
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
103,507 |
|
|
|
105,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of
unearned income |
|
$ |
126,130 |
|
|
$ |
14,830 |
|
|
$ |
41,644 |
|
|
$ |
102,132 |
|
|
$ |
8,785,826 |
|
|
$ |
9,070,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aging as a % of Loan Balance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
97.5 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Commercial real-estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential construction |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
87.5 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Commercial construction |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
92.6 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Land |
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
86.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Office |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
98.2 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
98.3 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Retail |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
97.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Multi-family |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
93.8 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Mixed use and other |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
96.6 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial real-estate |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
95.1 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and
commercial real-estate |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
95.9 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
98.7 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
96.5 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Premium finance receivables
commercial |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
96.8 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Premium finance receivables
life insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
99.4 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Indirect consumer |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
96.5 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Consumer and other |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
98.6 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of
unearned income |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
96.8 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
The amounts shown in non-accrual and the 90+ days and still accruing represent the Companys
total reported non-performing loans balance. As of March 31, 2010, only $42 million of all loans,
or 0.5%, were 60 to 89 days past due and $102 million, or 1.1%, were 30 to 59 days (or one payment)
past due. As of December 31, 2009, only $37 million of all loans, or 0.4%, were 60 to 89 days past
due and only $64 million, or 0.8%, were 30 to 59 days (or one payment) past due.
The majority of the commercial and commercial real estate loans shown as 60 to 89 days and 30 to 59
days past due are included on the Companys internal problem loan reporting system. Loans on this
system are closely monitored by management on a monthly basis. Near-term delinquencies (30 to 59
days past due) increased $38.4 million since December 31, 2009. However, the three categories of
commercial real-estate loans (residential construction, commercial construction and land) that have
comprised the largest portion of non-performing loans and ultimately net charge-offs, declined by
$10.9 million since December 31, 2009.
The Companys home equity and residential loan portfolios continue to exhibit low delinquency
ratios. Home equity loans at March 31, 2010 that are current with regard to the contractual terms
of the loan agreement represent 98.7% of the total home equity portfolio. Residential real estate
loans at March 31, 2010 that are current with regards to the contractual terms of the loan
agreements comprise 96.5% of total residential real estate loans outstanding.
The ratio of non-performing commercial premium finance receivables fluctuates throughout the year
due to the nature and timing of canceled account collections from insurance carriers. Due to the
nature of collateral for commercial premium finance receivables, it customarily takes 60-150 days
to convert the collateral into cash. Accordingly, the level of non-performing commercial premium
finance receivables is not necessarily indicative of the loss inherent in the portfolio. In the
event of default, Wintrust has the power to cancel the insurance policy and collect the unearned
portion of the premium from the insurance carrier. In the event of cancellation, the cash returned
in payment of the unearned premium by the insurer should generally be sufficient to cover the
receivable balance, the interest and other charges due. Due to notification requirements and
processing time by most insurance carriers, many receivables will become delinquent beyond 90 days
while the insurer is processing the return of the unearned premium. Management continues to accrue
interest until maturity as the unearned premium is ordinarily sufficient to pay-off the outstanding
balance and contractual interest due.
67
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
90+ days and |
|
|
60-89 days |
|
|
30-59 days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Accrual |
|
|
still accruing |
|
|
past due |
|
|
past due |
|
|
Current |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
Loan Balances: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
16,509 |
|
|
$ |
561 |
|
|
$ |
6,747 |
|
|
$ |
3,168 |
|
|
$ |
1,716,224 |
|
|
$ |
1,743,209 |
|
Commercial real-estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential construction |
|
|
14,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,877 |
|
|
|
5,070 |
|
|
|
153,412 |
|
|
|
174,423 |
|
Commercial construction |
|
|
5,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,333 |
|
|
|
287,015 |
|
|
|
308,580 |
|
Land |
|
|
41,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,548 |
|
|
|
2,468 |
|
|
|
274,407 |
|
|
|
326,720 |
|
Office |
|
|
2,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,324 |
|
|
|
463,588 |
|
|
|
467,587 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
3,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,141 |
|
|
|
439,997 |
|
|
|
444,891 |
|
Retail |
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,978 |
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
448,301 |
|
|
|
452,760 |
|
Multi-family |
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
9,371 |
|
|
|
231,425 |
|
|
|
241,710 |
|
Mixed use and other |
|
|
12,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,517 |
|
|
|
4,464 |
|
|
|
858,146 |
|
|
|
880,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial real-estate |
|
|
80,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,546 |
|
|
|
41,221 |
|
|
|
3,156,291 |
|
|
|
3,296,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and
commercial real-estate |
|
|
97,148 |
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
25,293 |
|
|
|
44,389 |
|
|
|
4,872,515 |
|
|
|
5,039,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
8,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
894 |
|
|
|
2,107 |
|
|
|
918,598 |
|
|
|
930,482 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
3,779 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
3,043 |
|
|
|
298,656 |
|
|
|
306,296 |
|
Premium finance receivables
commercial |
|
|
11,878 |
|
|
|
6,271 |
|
|
|
3,975 |
|
|
|
9,639 |
|
|
|
698,381 |
|
|
|
730,144 |
|
Premium finance receivables
life insurance |
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,385 |
|
|
|
1,854 |
|
|
|
1,189,950 |
|
|
|
1,197,893 |
|
Indirect consumer |
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
614 |
|
|
|
2,143 |
|
|
|
93,921 |
|
|
|
98,134 |
|
Consumer and other |
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
107,156 |
|
|
|
108,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of
unearned income |
|
$ |
124,004 |
|
|
$ |
7,800 |
|
|
$ |
37,078 |
|
|
$ |
63,712 |
|
|
$ |
8,179,177 |
|
|
$ |
8,411,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aging as a % of Loan Balance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
98.5 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Commercial real-estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential construction |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
87.9 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Commercial construction |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
93.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Land |
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
84.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Office |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
99.1 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
98.9 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Retail |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
99.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Multi-family |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
95.7 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Mixed use and other |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
97.5 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial real-estate |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
95.7 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and
commercial real-estate |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
96.7 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
98.7 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
97.6 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Premium finance receivables
commercial |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
95.7 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Premium finance receivables
life insurance |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
99.3 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Indirect consumer |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
95.7 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Consumer and other |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
98.3 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of
unearned income |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
97.2 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses represents managements estimate of the probable and reasonably
estimable loan losses that our loan portfolio is expected to incur. The allowance for loan losses
is determined quarterly using a methodology that incorporates important risk characteristics of
each loan, as described below under How We Determine the Allowance for Credit Losses . This
process is subject to review at each of our bank subsidiaries by the applicable regulatory
authority, including the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, the Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, the State of Illinois and the State of Wisconsin.
Management has determined that the allowance for loan losses was appropriate at March 31, 2010, and
that the loan portfolio is well diversified and well secured, without undue concentration in any
specific risk area. This process involves a high degree of management judgment, however the
allowance for credit losses is based on a comprehensive, well documented, and consistently applied
analysis of the Companys loan portfolio. This analysis takes into consideration all available
information existing as of the financial statement date, including environmental factors such as
economic, industry, geographical and political factors. The relative level of allowance for credit
losses is reviewed and compared to industry peers. This review encompasses levels of total
nonperforming loans, portfolio mix, portfolio concentrations, current geographic risks and overall
levels of net charge-offs. Historical trending of both the Companys results and the industry peers
is also reviewed to analyze comparative significance.
69
The following table summarizes the activity in our allowance for credit losses during the periods
indicated.
Allowance for Credit Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period |
|
$ |
98,277 |
|
|
$ |
69,767 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
29,044 |
|
|
|
14,473 |
|
Other adjustments allowance for loan losses related to
consolidation of securitization entity |
|
|
1,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification to allowance for unfunded lending-related commitments |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real estate loans |
|
|
24,919 |
|
|
|
7,890 |
|
Home equity loans |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
Residential real estate loans |
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
Premium finance receivables commercial |
|
|
1,933 |
|
|
|
1,351 |
|
Premium finance receivables life insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
Consumer and other loans |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs |
|
|
27,992 |
|
|
|
10,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real estate loans |
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
Home equity loans |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Residential real estate loans |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Premium finance receivables commercial |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
Premium finance receivables life insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Consumer and other loans |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries |
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
(26,768 |
) |
|
|
(9,992 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses at period end |
|
$ |
102,397 |
|
|
$ |
74,248 |
|
Allowance for lending related commitments at period end |
|
|
3,653 |
|
|
|
1,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses at period end |
|
$ |
106,050 |
|
|
$ |
75,834 |
|
Credit discounts on purchased loans |
|
|
33,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit reserves |
|
$ |
140,040 |
|
|
$ |
75,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized net charge-offs by category as a percentage of its own
respective categorys average: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real estate loans |
|
|
1.94 |
% |
|
|
0.65 |
% |
Home equity loans |
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
Residential real estate loans |
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
Premium finance receivables commercial |
|
|
0.54 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
Premium finance receivables life insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
0.81 |
|
Consumer and other loans |
|
|
0.48 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
1.19 |
% |
|
|
0.51 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs as a percentage of the provision for credit losses |
|
|
92.48 |
% |
|
|
69.04 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans at period-end |
|
|
9,070,562 |
|
|
|
7,841,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans at period-end |
|
|
1.13 |
% |
|
|
0.95 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of loans at period-end |
|
|
1.17 |
% |
|
|
0.97 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit reserves as a percentage of loans at period-end |
|
|
1.54 |
% |
|
|
0.97 |
% |
70
The allowance for credit losses is comprised of the allowance for loan losses and the
allowance for lending-related commitments. The allowance for loan losses is a reserve against loan
amounts that are actually funded and outstanding while the allowance for lending-related
commitments relates to certain amounts that Wintrust is committed to lend but for which funds have
not yet been disbursed. The allowance for lending-related commitments (separate liability account)
represents the portion of the provision for credit losses that was associated with unfunded
lending-related commitments. The provision for credit losses may contain both a component related
to funded loans (provision for loan losses) and a component related to lending-related commitments
(provision for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit). Total credit-related reserves
include the credit discounts on the purchased life insurance premium finance receivables which are
netted with the loan balance. Additionally, on January 1, 2010, in conjunction with recording the
securitization facility on its balance sheet, the Company established an allowance for loan losses
totaling $1.9 million. This addition to the allowance for loan losses is shown as an other
adjustment to the allowance for loan losses.
How We Determine the Allowance for Credit Losses
The allowance for loan losses includes an element for estimated probable but undetected losses and
for imprecision in the credit risk models used to calculate the allowance. As part of the Problem
Loan Reporting system review, the Company analyzes the loan for purposes of calculating our
specific impairment reserves and a general reserve.
Specific Impairment Reserves:
Loans with a credit risk rating of a 6 through 9 are reviewed on a monthly basis to determine if
(a) an amount is deemed uncollectible (a charge-off) or (b) there is an amount with respect to
which it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect amounts due in accordance with the
original contractual terms of the loan (a specific impairment reserve). Loans which are not
assigned a specific reserve are included in the determination of the general reserve.
General Reserves:
For loans with a credit risk rating of 5 or better and loans with a risk rating of 6 through 9 with
no specific reserve, reserves are established based on the type of loan collateral, if any, and the
assigned credit risk rating. Determination of the allowance is inherently subjective as it requires
significant estimates, including the amounts and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired
loans, estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience, and
consideration of current environmental factors and economic trends, all of which may be susceptible
to significant change.
We determine this component of the allowance for loan losses by classifying each loan into (i) one
of 87 categories based on the type of collateral that secures the loan (if any), and (ii) one of
nine categories based on the credit risk rating of the loan, as
described above under Past Due
Loans and Non-Performing Assets . Each combination of collateral and credit risk rating is then
assigned a specific loss factor that incorporates the following factors:
|
|
|
historical underwriting loss factor; |
|
|
|
|
changes in lending policies and procedures, including changes in underwriting standards and collection,
charge-off, and recovery practices not considered elsewhere in estimating credit losses; |
|
|
|
|
changes in national, regional, and local economic and business conditions and developments that affect the
collectibility of the portfolio; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio and in the terms of the loans; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending management and other relevant staff; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the volume and severity of past due loans, the volume of non-accrual loans, and the volume and
severity of adversely classified or graded loans; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the quality of the banks loan review system; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the underlying collateral for collateral dependent loans; |
|
|
|
|
the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit, and changes in the level of such concentrations; and |
|
|
|
|
the effect of other external factors such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements on the level
of estimated credit losses in the banks existing portfolio. |
71
Recent Refinements to the Methodology:
The Companys methodology for determining the allowance for loan losses was refined in the second
quarter of 2008, in order to:
|
|
|
expand and standardize the classification of collateral at each of the Companys 15 subsidiary banks; |
|
|
|
|
comply with emerging regulatory guidance to modify our credit risk rating processes; and |
|
|
|
|
facilitate the development of a model for determining the allowance for loan losses on a loan-by-loan basis. |
The refined methodology was developed in consultation with the examination teams of the Federal
Reserve Bank of Chicago, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the State of Illinois and
the State of Wisconsin, and we believe it provides a greater level of detail to management within
the existing process. The refined methodology did not result in a materially different
determination of the allowance for loan losses, but has given our management a greater level of
detail by providing the appropriate allowance for loan losses on a loan-by-loan basis.
Additionally, as previously described above under Past Due Loans and Non-Performing Assets, in
the first quarter of 2010, the Company modified its credit risk rating process to reflect a 1
through 10 risk rating scale. Prior to this, the Company employed a 1 through 9 credit risk rating
scale.
Home Equity and Residential Real Estate Loans:
The determination of the appropriate allowance for loan losses for residential real estate and home
equity loans differs slightly from the process used for commercial and commercial real estate
loans. The same credit risk rating system, Problem Loan Reporting system, collateral coding
methodology and loss factor assignment are used. The only significant difference is in how the
credit risk ratings are assigned to these loans.
The home equity loan portfolio is reviewed on a loan by loan basis by analyzing current FICO scores
of the borrowers, line availability, recent line usage and the aging status of the loan. Certain of
these factors, or combination of these factors, may cause a portion of the credit risk ratings of
home equity loans across all banks to be downgraded. Similar to commercial and commercial real
estate loans, once a home equity loans credit risk rating is downgraded to a 6 or worse, the
Companys Managed Asset Division reviews and advises the subsidiary banks as to collateral
valuations and as to the ultimate resolution of the credits that deteriorate to a non-accrual
status to minimize losses.
Residential real estate loans that are downgraded to a credit risk rating of 6 or worse also enter
the Problem Loan Reporting system and have the underlying collateral evaluated by the Managed
Assets Division.
Premium Finance Receivables and Indirect Consumer Loans:
The determination of the appropriate allowance for loan losses for premium finance receivables and
indirect consumer loans is based solely on the aging (collection status) of the portfolios. Due to
the large number of generally smaller sized and homogenous credits in these portfolios, these loans
are not individually assigned a credit risk rating. Loss factors are assigned to each delinquency
category in order to calculate an allowance for credit losses. The allowance for loan losses for
these categories is entirely a general reserve.
Effects of Economic Recession and Real Estate Market:
The Companys primary markets, which are mostly in suburban Chicago, have not experienced the same
levels of credit deterioration in residential mortgage and home equity loans as certain other major
metropolitan markets, such as Miami, Phoenix or Southern California, however the Companys markets
have clearly been under stress. As of March 31, 2010, home equity loans and residential mortgages
comprised 10% and 4%, respectively, of the Companys total loan portfolio. At present,
approximately only 2% of all of the Companys residential mortgage loans and approximately only 1%
of all of the Companys home equity loans are more than one payment past due. Current delinquency
statistics of these two portfolios, demonstrating that although there is stress in the Chicago
metropolitan and southeastern Wisconsin markets, our portfolios of residential mortgages and home
equity loans are performing reasonably well as reflected in the aging of the Companys loan
portfolio table shown earlier in this section.
Methodology in Assessing Impairment and Charge-off Amounts
In determining the amount of impairment or charge-offs associated with a loan, the Company values
the loan generally by starting with a valuation obtained from an appraisal of the underlying
collateral and then deducting estimated selling costs to arrive at a net appraised value. We obtain
the appraisals of the underlying collateral from one of a pre-approved list of independent, third
party appraisal firms.
In many cases, the Company simultaneously values the underlying collateral by marketing the
property or related note to market participants interested in purchasing properties of the same
type. If the Company receives offers or indications of interest, we will analyze the price and
review market conditions to assess whether in light of such information the appraised value
overstates the likely price and that a lower price would be a better assessment of the market value
of the property and would enable us to liquidate the
72
collateral. Additionally, the Company takes into account the strength of any guarantees and the
ability of the borrower to provide value related to those guarantees in determining the ultimate
charge-off or reserve associated with any impaired loans. Accordingly, the Company may charge-off a
loan to a value below the net appraised value if it believes that an expeditious liquidation is
desirable in the circumstance and it has legitimate offers or other indications of interest to
support a value that is less than the net appraised value. Alternatively, the Company may carry a
loan at a value that is in excess of the appraised value if the Company has a guarantee from a
borrower that the Company believes has realizable value. In evaluating the strength of any
guarantee, the Company evaluates the financial wherewithal of the guarantor, the guarantors
reputation, and the guarantors willingness and desire to work with the Company. The Company then
conducts a review of the strength of a guarantee on a frequency established as the circumstances
and conditions of the borrower warrant.
In circumstances where the Company has received an appraisal but has no third party offers or
indications of interest, the Company may enlist the input of realtors in the local market as to the
highest valuation that the realtor believes would result in a liquidation of the property given a
reasonable marketing period of approximately 90 days. To the extent that the realtors indication
of market clearing price under such scenario is less than the net appraised valuation, the Company
may take a charge-off on the loan to a valuation that is less than the net appraised valuation.
The Company may also charge-off a loan below the net appraised valuation if the Company holds a
junior mortgage position in a piece of collateral whereby the risk to acquiring control of the
property through the purchase of the senior mortgage position is deemed to potentially increase the
risk of loss upon liquidation due to the amount of time to ultimately market the property and the
volatile market conditions. In such cases, the Company may abandon its junior mortgage and
charge-off the loan balance in full.
In other cases, the Company may allow the borrower to conduct a short sale, which is a sale where
the Company allows the borrower to sell the property at a value less than the amount of the loan.
Many times, it is possible for the current owner to receive a better price than if the property is
marketed by a financial institution which the market place perceives to have a greater desire to
liquidate the property at a lower price. To the extent that we allow a short sale at a price below
the value indicated by an appraisal, we may take a charge-off beyond the value that an appraisal
would have indicated.
Other market conditions may require a reserve to bring the carrying value of the loan below the net
appraised valuation such as litigation surrounding the borrower and/or property securing our loan
or other market conditions impacting the value of the collateral. Having determined the net value based on the factors such as noted above and compared that value to
the book value of the loan, the Company arrives at a charge-off amount or a specific reserve
included in the allowance for loan losses. In summary, for collateral dependent loans, appraisals
are used as the fair value starting point in the estimate of net value. Estimated costs to sell are
deducted from the appraised value to arrive at the net appraised value. Although an external
appraisal is the primary source of valuation utilized for charge-offs on collateral dependent
loans, we may utilize values obtained through purchase and sale agreements, legitimate indications
of interest, negotiated short sales, realtor price opinions, sale of the note or support from
guarantors as the basis for charge-offs. These alternative sources of value are used only if deemed
to be more representative of value based on updated information regarding collateral resolution. In
addition, if an appraisal is not deemed current, a discount to appraised value may be utilized. Any
adjustments from appraised value to net value are detailed and justified in an impairment analysis,
which is reviewed and approved by the Companys Managed Assets Division.
Restructured Loans
At March 31, 2010, the Company had $69.4 million in loans with modified terms. The $69.4 million
in modified loans represents 74 credit relationships in which economic concessions were granted to
financially distressed borrowers to better align the terms of their loans with their current
ability to pay. These actions were taken on a case-by-case basis working with financially
distressed borrowers to find a concession that would assist them in retaining their businesses or
their homes and attempt to keep these loans in an accruing status for the Company.
These 74 credits comprised of $12.6 million of commercial, $54.6 million of
commercial real estate and $2.2 million of residential real estate. 69 credits, totaling $65.1 million were
in an accruing status and five credits, totaling $4.3 million were in nonaccrual status as of March 31,
2010. Subsequent to its restructuring any restructured loan with a below market rate concession that becomes nonaccrual will remain classified by the Company as a restructured loan for its duration and will be included in the Companys non-performing loans.
Each restructured loan was reviewed for collateral impairment at March 31, 2010 and approximately $1.7 million of collateral impairment was present and appropriately reserved for through the Companys normal reserving methodology in the Companys allowance for loan losses. Additionally, none of these loans at March 31, 2010 had
impairment based on the present value of expected cash flows, thus there was no impact on interest
income.
73
Other Real Estate Owned
The table below presents a summary of other real estate owned as of March 31, 2010 and shows the
changes in the balance from December 31, 2009 for each property type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Development |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Balance |
|
(Dollars in Thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
R |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
R |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
R |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
R |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
5,889 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
$ |
41,992 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
$ |
32,282 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
$ |
80,163 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Transfers in at Fair Value
less estimated costs to sell |
|
|
4,081 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
15,651 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
20,152 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Fair Value adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(312 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(312 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Resolved |
|
|
(494 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(8,020 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2,480 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(10,994 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
9,476 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
$ |
34,392 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
$ |
45,141 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
$ |
89,009 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
41,517 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R Number of relationships
LIQUIDITY
Wintrust manages the liquidity position of its banking operations to ensure that sufficient funds
are available to meet customers needs for loans and deposit withdrawals. The liquidity to meet
these demands is provided by maturing assets, liquid assets that can be converted to cash and the
ability to attract funds from external sources. Liquid assets refer to money market assets such as
Federal funds sold and interest bearing deposits with banks, as well as available-for-sale debt
securities which are not pledged to secure public funds.
While the Company obtains a portion of its total deposits through brokered deposits, the Company
does so primarily as an asset-liability management tool to assist in the management of interest
rate risk, and the Company does not consider brokered deposits to be a vital component of its
current liquidity resources. For example, as of March 31, 2010, Wintrust had in excess of $1 billion of cash, overnight funds and interest-bearing deposits with other banks (primarily the
Federal Reserve) on its books, but only maintained $837.4 million of brokered deposits.
Historically, brokered deposits have represented a small component of the Companys total deposits
outstanding, as set forth in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Total Deposits |
|
$ |
9,724,870 |
|
|
$ |
8,625,977 |
|
|
$ |
9,917,074 |
|
|
$ |
8,376,750 |
|
|
$ |
7,471,441 |
|
Brokered Deposits (1) |
|
$ |
837,388 |
|
|
$ |
808,309 |
|
|
$ |
927,722 |
|
|
$ |
800,042 |
|
|
$ |
505,069 |
|
Brokered Deposits as a percentage of
Total Deposits (1) |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Brokered Deposits include certificates of deposit obtained through deposit brokers, deposits received through the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry
Program (CDARS), as well as wealth management deposits of brokerage customers from unaffiliated companies which have been placed into deposit accounts
of the banks. |
In December, 2008 the Company sold the Series B preferred stock and warrant to the federal
government in connection with the Companys participation in Treasurys Capital Purchase Program.
As of December 31, 2008, these were the only funds received by the Company from the federal
government. Without the CPP funds, however, Wintrust would have been well capitalized as of
December 31, 2008.
As discussed in Note 8 of the Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report, in
September 2009, the Companys subsidiary, FIFC, sponsored a QSPE that issued $600 million in
aggregate principal amount of its Notes. The QSPEs obligations under the Notes are secured by
loans made to buyers of property and casualty insurance policies to finance the related premiums
payable by the buyers to the insurance companies for the policies. At the time of issuance, the
Notes were eligible collateral under TALF and certain investors therefore received non-recourse
funding from the New York Fed in order to purchase the Notes. As a result, FIFC believes it
received greater proceeds at lower interest rates from the securitization than it otherwise would
have received in a non-TALF-eligible transaction. In accordance with applicable accounting
guidance, effective January 1, 2010, the QSPE is accounted for as a consolidated subsidiary of the
Company.
74
The Company believes that it has sufficient funds and access to funds to meet its working capital
and other needs. Please refer to the Interest-Earning Assets, Deposits, Other Funding Sources and
Shareholders Equity discussions of this report for additional information regarding the Companys
liquidity position.
INFLATION
A banking organizations assets and liabilities are primarily monetary. Changes in the rate of
inflation do not have as great an impact on the financial condition of a bank as do changes in
interest rates. Moreover, interest rates do not necessarily change at the same percentage as
inflation. Accordingly, changes in inflation are not expected to have a material impact on the
Company. An analysis of the Companys asset and liability structure provides the best indication of
how the organization is positioned to respond to changing interest rates. See Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks section of this report for additional information.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This document contains, and the documents into which it may be incorporated by reference may
contain, forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. Forward-looking
information can be identified through the use of words such as intend, plan, project,
expect, anticipate, believe, estimate, contemplate, possible, point, will, may,
should, would and could. Forward-looking statements and information are not historical facts,
are premised on many factors and assumptions, and represent only managements expectations,
estimates and projections regarding future events. Similarly, these statements are not guarantees
of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict,
which may include, but are not limited to, those listed below and the Risk Factors discussed under
Item 1A of the Companys 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K and in any of the Companys subsequent SEC
filings. The Company intends such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor
provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995, and is including this statement for purposes of invoking these safe harbor provisions.
Such forward-looking statements may be deemed to include, among other things, statements relating
to the Companys future financial performance, the performance of its loan portfolio, the expected
amount of future credit reserves and charge-offs, delinquency trends, growth plans, regulatory
developments, securities that the Company may offer from time to time, and managements long-term
performance goals, as well as statements relating to the anticipated effects on financial condition
and results of operations from expected developments or events, the Companys business and growth
strategies, including future acquisitions of banks, specialty finance or wealth management
businesses, internal growth and plans to form additional de novo banks or branch offices. Actual
results could differ materially from those addressed in the forward-looking statements as a result
of numerous factors, including the following:
|
|
|
negative economic conditions that adversely affect the economy, housing prices, the job market and other
factors that may affect the Companys liquidity and the performance of its loan portfolios, particularly
in the markets in which it operates; |
|
|
|
|
the extent of defaults and losses on the Companys loan portfolio, which may require further increases
in its allowance for credit losses; |
|
|
|
|
estimates of fair value of certain of the Companys assets and liabilities, which could change in value
significantly from period to period; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the level and volatility of interest rates, the capital markets and other market indices that
may affect, among other things, the Companys liquidity and the value of its assets and liabilities; |
|
|
|
|
a decrease in the Companys regulatory capital ratios, including as a result of further declines in the
value of its loan portfolios, or otherwise; |
|
|
|
|
effects resulting from the Companys participation in the Capital Purchase Program, including
restrictions on dividends and executive compensation practices, as well as any future restrictions that
may become applicable to the Company; |
|
|
|
|
legislative or regulatory changes, particularly changes in regulation of financial services companies
and/or the products and services offered by financial services companies; |
|
|
|
|
increases in the Companys FDIC insurance premiums, or the collection of special assessments by the FDIC; |
|
|
|
|
competitive pressures in the financial services business which may affect the pricing of the Companys
loan and deposit products as well as its services (including wealth management services); |
|
|
|
|
delinquencies or fraud with respect to the Companys premium finance business; |
75
|
|
|
the Companys ability to comply with covenants under its securitization facility and credit facility; |
|
|
|
|
credit downgrades among commercial and life insurance providers that could negatively affect the value
of collateral securing the Companys premium finance loans; |
|
|
|
|
any negative perception of the Companys reputation or financial strength; |
|
|
|
|
the loss of customers as a result of technological changes allowing consumers to complete their
financial transactions without the use of a bank; |
|
|
|
|
the ability of the Company to attract and retain senior management experienced in the banking and
financial services industries; |
|
|
|
|
failure to identify and complete favorable acquisitions in the future, or unexpected difficulties or
developments related to the integration of recent acquisitions, including with respect any FDIC-assisted
acquisitions; |
|
|
|
|
unexpected difficulties or unanticipated developments related to the Companys strategy of de novo bank
formations and openings, which typically require over 13 months of operations before becoming profitable
due to the impact of organizational and overhead expenses, the startup phase of generating deposits and
the time lag typically involved in redeploying deposits into attractively priced loans and other higher
yielding earning assets; |
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting standards, rules and interpretations (including SFAS 166 and 167) and the impact
on the Corporations financial statements; |
|
|
|
|
significant litigation involving the Company; and |
|
|
|
|
the ability of the Company to receive dividends from its subsidiaries. |
Therefore, there can be no assurances that future actual results will correspond to these
forward-looking statements. The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on any
forward-looking statement made by the Company. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the
date they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking
statement to reflect the impact of circumstances or events that arise after the date the
forward-looking statement was made. Persons are advised, however, to consult further disclosures
management makes on related subjects in its reports filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and in its press releases.
76
ITEM 3
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS
As an ongoing part of its financial strategy, the Company attempts to manage the impact of
fluctuations in market interest rates on net interest income. This effort entails providing a
reasonable balance between interest rate risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and maintenance of
yield. Asset-liability management policies are established and monitored by management in
conjunction with the boards of directors of the banks, subject to general oversight by the Risk
Management Committee of the Companys Board of Directors. The policies establish guidelines for
acceptable limits on the sensitivity of the market value of assets and liabilities to changes in
interest rates.
Interest rate risk arises when the maturity or repricing periods and interest rate indices of the
interest earning assets, interest bearing liabilities, and derivative financial instruments are
different. It is the risk that changes in the level of market interest rates will result in
disproportionate changes in the value of, and the net earnings generated from, the Companys
interest earning assets, interest bearing liabilities and derivative financial instruments. The
Company continuously monitors not only the organizations current net interest margin, but also the
historical trends of these margins. In addition, management attempts to identify potential adverse
changes in net interest income in future years as a result interest rate fluctuations by performing
simulation analysis of various interest rate environments. If a potential adverse change in net
interest margin and/or net income is identified, management would take appropriate actions with its
asset-liability structure to mitigate these potentially adverse situations. Please refer to Item 2
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for further
discussion of the net interest margin.
Since the Companys primary source of interest bearing liabilities is from customer deposits, the
Companys ability to manage the types and terms of such deposits may be somewhat limited by
customer preferences and local competition in the market areas in which the banks operate. The
rates, terms and interest rate indices of the Companys interest earning assets result primarily
from the Companys strategy of investing in loans and securities that permit the Company to limit
its exposure to interest rate risk, together with credit risk, while at the same time achieving an
acceptable interest rate spread.
The Companys exposure to interest rate risk is reviewed on a regular basis by management and the
Risk Management Committees of the boards of directors of the banks and the Company. The objective
is to measure the effect on net income and to adjust balance sheet and derivative financial
instruments to minimize the inherent risk while at the same time maximize net interest income.
Management measures its exposure to changes in interest rates using many different interest rate
scenarios. One interest rate scenario utilized is to measure the percentage change in net interest
income assuming a ramped increase and decrease of 100 and 200 basis points that occurs in equal
steps over a twelve-month time horizon. Utilizing this measurement concept, the interest rate risk
of the Company, expressed as a percentage change in net interest income over a one-year time
horizon due to changes in interest rates, at March 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009 is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ 200 |
|
+ 100 |
|
- 100 |
|
- 200 |
|
|
Basis |
|
Basis |
|
Basis |
|
Basis |
|
|
Points |
|
Points |
|
Points |
|
Points |
|
|
|
Percentage
change in net
interest income due
to a ramped 100 and
200 basis point
shift in the yield
curve: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
(2.4 |
)% |
|
|
(9.5 |
)% |
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
(2.4 |
)% |
|
|
(6.6 |
)% |
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
(2.4 |
)% |
This simulation analysis is based upon actual cash flows and repricing characteristics for balance
sheet instruments and incorporates managements projections of the future volume and pricing of
each of the product lines offered by the Company as well as other pertinent assumptions. Actual
results may differ from these simulated results due to timing, magnitude, and frequency of interest
rate changes as well as changes in market conditions and management strategies.
One method utilized by financial institutions to manage interest rate risk is to enter into
derivative financial instruments. A derivative financial instrument includes interest rate swaps,
interest rate caps and floors, futures, forwards, option contracts and other financial instruments
with similar characteristics. Additionally, the Company enters into commitments to fund certain
mortgage loans (interest rate locks) to be sold into the secondary market and forward commitments
for the future delivery of mortgage loans to third party investors. See Note 14 of the Financial
Statements presented under Item 1 of this report for further information on the Companys
derivative financial instruments.
During the first three months of 2010, the Company entered into certain covered call option
transactions related to certain securities held by the Company. The Company uses these option
transactions (rather than entering into other derivative interest rate contracts, such as interest
rate floors) to increase the total return associated with the related securities. Although the
revenue received from these options is recorded as non-interest income rather than interest income,
the increased return attributable to the related securities from these options contributes to the
Companys overall profitability. The Companys exposure to interest rate risk may be impacted by
these transactions. To mitigate this risk, the Company may acquire fixed rate term debt or use
financial derivative instruments. There were no covered call options outstanding as of March 31,
2010.
77
ITEM 4
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer carried out an evaluation under their supervision, with the participation of
other members of management as they deemed appropriate, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as contemplated by Exchange Act Rule
13a-15. Based upon, and as of the date of that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective, in
all material respects, in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (and
its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the periodic reports the Company is
required to file and submit to the SEC under the Exchange Act.
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the period
covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II Other Information
Item 1A: Risk Factors
There were no material changes from the risk factors set forth under Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors
in the Companys Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
Item 2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
No purchases of the Companys common shares were made by or on behalf of the Company or any
affiliated purchaser as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, during the three months ended March 31, 2010. There is currently no authorization to
repurchase shares of outstanding common stock.
The Purchase Agreement pursuant to which the Series B Preferred Stock was issued provides that no
share repurchases may be made until the earlier of (a) the third anniversary of the date of
issuance of the Series B Preferred Stock and (b) the date on which the Series B Preferred Stock has
been redeemed in whole or the US Treasury has transferred all of the Series B Preferred Stock to
third parties. The Series B Preferred Stock was issued on December 19, 2008.
Item 6: Exhibits.
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
78
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: May 10, 2010 |
/s/ DAVID L. STOEHR
|
|
|
David L. Stoehr |
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
79