e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from
to
Commission File Number 001-33689
athenahealth, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
04-3387530 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
311 Arsenal Street, Watertown, Massachusetts
|
|
02472 |
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
617-402-1000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of
July 22, 2010, there were 34,143,627 shares of the registrants $0.01 par value common
stock outstanding.
athenahealth, Inc.
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAGE |
|
Item 1. |
|
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited). |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30,
2010 and 2009 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
4 |
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
|
|
17 |
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. |
|
|
26 |
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures. |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART IIOTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings. |
|
|
27 |
|
Item 1A. |
|
Risk Factors. |
|
|
27 |
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. |
|
|
28 |
|
Item 3. |
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities. |
|
|
28 |
|
Item 4. |
|
(Removed and Reserved). |
|
|
28 |
|
Item 5. |
|
Other Information. |
|
|
28 |
|
Item 6. |
|
Exhibits. |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURES |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ii
PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited).
athenahealth, Inc.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited, in thousands, except per-share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June |
|
December |
|
|
30, 2010 |
|
31, 2009 |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
27,945 |
|
|
$ |
30,526 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
61,457 |
|
|
|
52,323 |
|
Accounts receivable - net |
|
|
35,247 |
|
|
|
33,323 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
3,932 |
|
|
|
5,544 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
6,529 |
|
|
|
4,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
135,110 |
|
|
|
126,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment - net |
|
|
31,053 |
|
|
|
24,871 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
8,885 |
|
|
|
9,216 |
|
Software development costs - net |
|
|
2,768 |
|
|
|
2,324 |
|
Purchased intangibles - net |
|
|
13,570 |
|
|
|
14,490 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
22,120 |
|
|
|
22,120 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
12,295 |
|
|
|
10,284 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,116 |
|
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
226,917 |
|
|
$ |
211,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities & Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
3,322 |
|
|
$ |
3,437 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
2,246 |
|
|
|
1,880 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
14,647 |
|
|
|
15,774 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
11,316 |
|
|
|
10,781 |
|
Current
portion deferred revenue |
|
|
5,419 |
|
|
|
4,038 |
|
Interest rate derivative liability |
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
Current portion of deferred rent |
|
|
1,372 |
|
|
|
1,288 |
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
38,977 |
|
|
|
37,489 |
|
Deferred
revenue, net of current portion |
|
|
32,169 |
|
|
|
28,684 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
1,191 |
|
|
|
1,191 |
|
Deferred rent, net of current portion |
|
|
6,746 |
|
|
|
7,444 |
|
Debt and capital lease obligations, net of current portion |
|
|
7,643 |
|
|
|
8,951 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
86,726 |
|
|
|
83,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (note 12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value: 5,000 shares authorized; no shares issued
and outstanding at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value: 125,000 shares authorized; 35,417 shares issued,
and 34,139 shares outstanding at June 30, 2010; 35,166 shares issued and
33,888 shares outstanding at December 31, 2009. |
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
181,113 |
|
|
|
169,715 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 1,278 shares |
|
|
(1,200 |
) |
|
|
(1,200 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(39,901 |
) |
|
|
(41,476 |
) |
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
140,191 |
|
|
|
127,318 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
226,917 |
|
|
$ |
211,077 |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
athenahealth, Inc.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited, in thousands, except per-share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(as restated)(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(as restated)(1) |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business services |
|
$ |
56,399 |
|
|
$ |
44,429 |
|
|
$ |
108,964 |
|
|
$ |
84,324 |
|
Implementation and other |
|
|
2,153 |
|
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
4,065 |
|
|
|
2,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
58,552 |
|
|
|
45,648 |
|
|
|
113,029 |
|
|
|
86,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating |
|
|
24,101 |
|
|
|
19,397 |
|
|
|
47,620 |
|
|
|
37,958 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
12,693 |
|
|
|
8,888 |
|
|
|
24,753 |
|
|
|
15,887 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
4,824 |
|
|
|
3,439 |
|
|
|
8,898 |
|
|
|
6,620 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
11,403 |
|
|
|
8,394 |
|
|
|
23,080 |
|
|
|
16,595 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,657 |
|
|
|
1,798 |
|
|
|
5,077 |
|
|
|
3,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense |
|
|
55,678 |
|
|
|
41,916 |
|
|
|
109,428 |
|
|
|
80,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
2,874 |
|
|
|
3,732 |
|
|
|
3,601 |
|
|
|
6,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
722 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
(457 |
) |
(Loss) gain on interest rate derivative contract |
|
|
(304 |
) |
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
(364 |
) |
|
|
500 |
|
Other income |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other
(expense) income |
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
(492 |
) |
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
2,551 |
|
|
|
4,156 |
|
|
|
3,109 |
|
|
|
7,059 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
(1,253 |
) |
|
|
(1,912 |
) |
|
|
(1,534 |
) |
|
|
(3,277 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,298 |
|
|
$ |
2,244 |
|
|
$ |
1,575 |
|
|
$ |
3,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share - Basic |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share - Diluted |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in
computing net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
34,106 |
|
|
|
33,527 |
|
|
|
34,061 |
|
|
|
33,472 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
35,178 |
|
|
|
34,822 |
|
|
|
35,190 |
|
|
|
34,818 |
|
(1) |
|
See Note 2 Restatement and Reclassification of Previously
Issued Consolidated Financial Statements of Accompanying
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
athenahealth, Inc.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited, in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
(as restated)(1) |
Net income |
|
$ |
1,575 |
|
|
$ |
3,782 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
5,997 |
|
|
|
3,596 |
|
Amortization of premium (discounts) on investments |
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
(442 |
) |
Provision for uncollectible accounts |
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(399 |
) |
|
|
2,880 |
|
Tax benefit from stock-based awards |
|
|
(1,281 |
) |
|
|
(1,231 |
) |
Increase in fair value of contingent consideration |
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Loss (gain) on interest rate derivative contract |
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
(500 |
) |
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
6,694 |
|
|
|
3,992 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(2,347 |
) |
|
|
(612 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(584 |
) |
|
|
(1,289 |
) |
Other long-term assets |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
(896 |
) |
|
|
(1,431 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
4,866 |
|
|
|
2,801 |
|
Deferred rent |
|
|
(614 |
) |
|
|
(543 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
15,240 |
|
|
|
12,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized software development costs |
|
|
(1,579 |
) |
|
|
(1,060 |
) |
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(9,870 |
) |
|
|
(5,061 |
) |
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments |
|
|
50,450 |
|
|
|
37,000 |
|
Proceeds from sale or disposal of equipment |
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
3,366 |
|
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
|
(60,372 |
) |
|
|
(51,770 |
) |
Decrease in restricted cash |
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(20,677 |
) |
|
|
(17,193 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under stock plans |
|
|
3,425 |
|
|
|
697 |
|
Payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
|
(1,786 |
) |
|
|
(2,319 |
) |
Tax benefit from stock-based awards |
|
|
1,281 |
|
|
|
1,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
2,920 |
|
|
|
(391 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(2,581 |
) |
|
|
(5,613 |
) |
Cash and
cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
30,526 |
|
|
|
28,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
27,945 |
|
|
$ |
23,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash items - Property and equipment
recorded in accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
273 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information -
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
284 |
|
|
$ |
317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for taxes |
|
$ |
1,389 |
|
|
$ |
514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of contingent consideration |
|
$ |
304 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment acquired under capital leases |
|
$ |
363 |
|
|
$ |
3,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 2 Restatement and Reclassification of
Previously Issued Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements of Accompanying Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
athenahealth, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited amounts in thousands, except per-share amounts)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by
athenahealth, Inc. (the Company or we) in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States (GAAP) for interim financial reporting and as required by
Regulation S-X, Rule 10-01. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes
required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of the Companys management, the
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments
(consisting of items of a normal and recurring nature) necessary to present fairly the financial
position as of June 30, 2010, and the results of operations for the three and six month periods
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and cash flows for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
The results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. When preparing financial
statements in conformity with GAAP, we must make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses, and related disclosures at the date of the
financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The Company considers events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but
before the financial statements are issued to provide additional evidence relative to certain
estimates or to identify matters that require additional disclosure. Subsequent events have been
evaluated through the date of issuance of these financial statements. The accompanying unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with
the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009, included in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on
March 15, 2010.
2. RESTATEMENT AND RECLASSIFICATION OF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On March 9, 2010, we concluded that we needed to restate our previously issued consolidated
financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. We also concluded that we
needed to restate our previously issued condensed consolidated financial statements for the first,
second, and third quarters of 2009. The restatement resulted primarily from a correction in the
timing of revenue recognition of deferred implementation fees.
As part of the process to finalize our financial results for the year ended December 31, 2009,
we undertook a comprehensive review of our significant accounting policies. As a result of our
review, we concluded that, in prior and future periods, we will amortize deferred implementation
revenue over a longer expected performance period of twelve years in order to reflect the estimated
expected customer life. Previously, the expected performance period was estimated based upon the
initial customer contract term, which, for the vast majority of contracts, was one year in
duration. As a result of these adjustments, we also revised our previously calculated income tax
expense for each quarter in 2009. All information presented in the condensed consolidated financial
statements and the related notes include all such restatement adjustments.
In addition, in connection with the restatement, we have corrected previously issued financial
statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, for the following reclassification
items none of which had any effect on net income or stockholders equity for any period: a)
reimbursements of out of pocket (pass through) expenses which were previously netted against
operating expense have been grossed up and included in Implementation and other revenue in the
consolidated statements of operations and b) draw downs of the capital lease lines which were
previously presented as sources of cash within the financing activities section of the condensed
consolidated statements of cash flows have been reclassified as investing activities.
The following tables summarize the effects of the restatement and presentation
reclassifications on our previously issued condensed consolidated financial statements:
4
athenahealth, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited amounts in thousands, except per-share amounts)
Summary of increases (decreases) in Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
Net income, as previously reported |
|
$ |
3,029 |
|
|
$ |
5,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implementation revenue |
|
|
(1,308) |
|
|
|
(2,642) |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, restated |
|
$ |
2,244 |
|
|
$ |
3,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earning per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, as previously reported |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implementation revenue |
|
|
(0.04) |
|
|
|
(0.08) |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, restated |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earning per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, as previously reported |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implementation revenue |
|
|
(0.04) |
|
|
|
(0.07) |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, restated |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in
computing net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
33,527 |
|
|
|
33,472 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
34,822 |
|
|
|
34,818 |
|
5
athenahealth, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited amounts in thousands, except per-share amounts)
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations impact for the three months ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
As Previously |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
Reported |
|
Adjustments |
|
Reclassifications |
|
Restated |
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business services |
|
$ |
44,429 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
44,429 |
|
Implementation and other |
|
|
2,290 |
|
|
|
(1,308 |
) |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
46,719 |
|
|
|
(1,308 |
) |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
45,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating |
|
|
19,160 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
19,397 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
8,888 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
8,888 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
3,439 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,439 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
8,394 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
8,394 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,798 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
41,679 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
41,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
5,040 |
|
|
|
(1,308 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
320 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(283 |
) |
Gain on interest rate derivative contract |
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
308 |
|
Other income |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income |
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax benefit |
|
|
5,464 |
|
|
|
(1,308 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,156 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(2,435 |
) |
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,912 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
3,029 |
|
|
|
(785 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share - Basic |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share - Diluted |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in
computing net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
33,527 |
|
|
|
33,527 |
|
|
|
33,527 |
|
|
|
33,527 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
34,822 |
|
|
|
34,822 |
|
|
|
34,822 |
|
|
|
34,822 |
|
6
athenahealth, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited amounts in thousands, except per-share amounts)
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations impact for the six months ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
As Previously |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
Reported |
|
Adjustments |
|
Reclassifications |
|
Restated |
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business services |
|
$ |
84,324 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
84,324 |
|
Implementation and other |
|
|
4,494 |
|
|
|
(2,642 |
) |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
2,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
88,818 |
|
|
|
(2,642 |
) |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
86,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating |
|
|
37,458 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
37,958 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
15,887 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
15,887 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
6,620 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6,620 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
16,595 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
16,595 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
3,437 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
79,997 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
80,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
8,821 |
|
|
|
(2,642 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
722 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(457 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(457 |
) |
Gain on interest rate derivative contract |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
500 |
|
Other income |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income |
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax benefit |
|
|
9,701 |
|
|
|
(2,642 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
7,059 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(4,334 |
) |
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(3,277 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
5,367 |
|
|
|
(1,585 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share - Basic |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share - Diluted |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in
computing net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
33,472 |
|
|
|
33,472 |
|
|
|
33,472 |
|
|
|
33,472 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
34,818 |
|
|
|
34,818 |
|
|
|
34,818 |
|
|
|
34,818 |
|
7
athenahealth, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited amounts in thousands, except per-share amounts)
The following table includes selected information from our condensed consolidated statements
of cash flows presenting previously reported and restated cash flows, for the six months ended
June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
As Previously |
|
As |
|
|
Reported |
|
Restated |
Net income |
|
$ |
5,367 |
|
|
$ |
3,782 |
|
Deferred income taxes (1) |
|
|
3,937 |
|
|
|
2,880 |
|
Deferred revenue (1) |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
2,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sales and disposals of property and equipment (2) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,366 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(20,559) |
|
|
|
(17,193) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt and capital lease obligations (2) |
|
|
3,366 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
2,975 |
|
|
|
(391) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Revenue and related tax effect due to the correction of the accounting for
implementation fees. |
|
|
(2) |
|
To correct the presentation of draw downs of capital lease obligations. |
3. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Effective January 1, 2010, we adopted the new accounting standards for revenue recognition for
multiple deliverable revenue arrangements. This new authoritative guidance amends previously
issued guidance to eliminate the residual method of allocation for multiple-deliverable revenue
arrangements, and requires that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of an
arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method. The new authoritative
guidance also establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a
deliverable, which includes (1) vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE), if available,
(2) third-party evidence (TPE), if vendor-specific objective evidence is not available, and
(3) estimated selling price (ESP), if neither vendor-specific nor third-party evidence is
available. Additionally, it expands the disclosure requirements related to a vendors
multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. During the second quarter of 2010 we elected to adopt
early, as permitted by the guidance. As such, we have prospectively
(retroactive to January 1, 2010)
applied the provisions of the new authoritative guidance to all revenue arrangements entered into
or materially modified after January 1, 2010. Adopting the new standard will allow the company to
allocate the arrangement consideration if multiple service offerings are sold at the same time. A
sale of multiple services offerings could include any combination of the following services:
athenaCollector, athenaClinicals, athenaCommunicator or Business Analytics.
In accordance with the new authoritative guidance, we allocate arrangement consideration to
each deliverable in an arrangement based on its relative selling price. We determine selling price
using VSOE, if it exists; otherwise, we use TPE. If neither VSOE nor TPE of selling price exists
for a unit of accounting, we use ESP.
VSOE is generally limited to the price charged when the same or similar product is sold
separately. If a product or service is seldom sold separately, it is unlikely that we can determine
VSOE for the product or service. We define VSOE as a median price of recent standalone transactions
that are priced within a narrow range, as defined by us. TPE is determined based on the prices
charged by our competitors for a similar deliverable when sold separately. It may be difficult for
us to obtain sufficient information on competitor pricing to substantiate TPE and therefore we may
not always be able to use TPE.
If we are unable to establish selling price using VSOE or TPE, and the order was received or
materially modified after the implementation date of January 1, 2010 for the new authoritative
guidance, we will use ESP in our allocation of arrangement consideration. The objective of ESP is
to determine the price at which we would transact if the product or service were sold by us on a
standalone basis. Our determination of ESP involves a weighting of several factors based on the
specific facts and circumstances of the arrangement. We consider the selling price for similar
services, our ongoing pricing strategy and policies, the value of any enhancements that have been
built into the deliverable and the characteristics of the varying markets in which the deliverable
is sold.
8
athenahealth, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited amounts in thousands, except per-share amounts)
We plan to analyze the selling prices used in our allocation of arrangement consideration at a
minimum on an annual basis. Selling prices will be analyzed on a more frequent basis if a
significant change in our business necessitates a more timely analysis or if we experience
significant variances in our selling prices. For athenaCommunicator, the company will use an
estimated selling price when allocating the arrangement consideration if it is sold with another
deliverable.
Each deliverable within a multiple-deliverable revenue arrangement is accounted for as a
separate unit of accounting under the guidance of the new authoritative guidance if both of the
following criteria are met: (1) the delivered item or items have value to the customer on a
standalone basis and (2) for an arrangement that includes a general right of return relative to the
delivered item(s), delivery or performance of the undelivered item(s) is considered probable and
substantially in our control. We consider a deliverable to have standalone value if we sell this
item separately or if the item is sold by another vendor or could be resold by the customer.
Further, our revenue arrangements generally do not include a general right of return relative to
delivered products. Deliverables not meeting the criteria for being a separate unit of accounting
are combined with a deliverable that does meet that criterion. The appropriate allocation of
arrangement consideration and recognition of revenue is then determined for the combined unit of
accounting.
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the adoption of this guidance had no material
impact. The new accounting standards for revenue recognition, if applied in the same manner to the
year ended December 31, 2009, would not have had a material impact on total net revenue for that
fiscal year. In terms of the timing and pattern of revenue recognition, the new accounting
guidance is not expected to have a significant effect on total net revenue in periods immediately
after the initial adoption.
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by FASB and are adopted by us as
of the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, we believe that the impact of other
recently issued accounting pronouncements will not have a material impact on consolidated financial
position, results of operations, and cash flows, or do not apply to our operations.
4. NET INCOME PER SHARE
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed by
dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and potentially
dilutive securities outstanding during the period under the treasury stock method. Potentially
dilutive securities include stock options, restricted stock units, shares to be purchased under the
employee stock purchase plan, and warrants. Under the treasury stock method, dilutive securities
are assumed to be exercised at the beginning of the periods and as if funds obtained thereby were
used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. Securities are
excluded from the computations of diluted net income per share if their effect would be
antidilutive to earnings per share.
The following table reconciles the weighted average shares outstanding for basic and diluted
net income per share for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Net income |
|
$ |
1,298 |
|
|
$ |
2,244 |
|
|
$ |
1,575 |
|
|
$ |
3,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used
in computing basic net income
per share |
|
|
34,106 |
|
|
|
33,527 |
|
|
|
34,061 |
|
|
|
33,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share - Basic |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,298 |
|
|
$ |
2,244 |
|
|
$ |
1,575 |
|
|
$ |
3,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used
in computing basic net income
per share |
|
|
34,106 |
|
|
|
33,527 |
|
|
|
34,061 |
|
|
|
33,472 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities |
|
|
1,072 |
|
|
|
1,295 |
|
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
|
1,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used
in computing diluted net
income per share |
|
|
35,178 |
|
|
|
34,822 |
|
|
|
35,190 |
|
|
|
34,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share - Diluted |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
athenahealth, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited amounts in thousands, except per-share amounts)
The
computation of diluted net income per share does not include 2,927 options and
restricted stock units for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, because their inclusion
would have an antidilutive effect on net income per share. The computation of diluted net income
per share does not include 2,120 options for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, because
their inclusion would have an antidilutive effect on net income per share.
5. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Comprehensive income was as follows for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Net income |
|
$ |
1,298 |
|
|
$ |
2,244 |
|
|
$ |
1,575 |
|
|
$ |
3,782 |
|
Unrealized holding gain (loss) on
available-for-sale investments, net of tax |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(175 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
1,235 |
|
|
$ |
2,096 |
|
|
$ |
1,473 |
|
|
$ |
3,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents,
restricted cash, receivables, accounts payable, and accrued expenses approximated their estimated
fair values because of their short-term nature of these financial instruments. All highly liquid
debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less at the date of acquisition are
included in cash and cash equivalents. Included in cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009, are money market fund investments of $16,784 and $10,081, respectively,
which are reported at fair value.
The carrying amounts of the Companys debt obligations approximate fair value based upon our
best estimate of interest rates that would be available to the Company for similar debt
obligations. The estimated fair value of our long-term debt was determined using quoted market
prices and other inputs that were derived from available market information and may not be
representative of actual values that could have been or will be realized in the future.
The following table presents information about the Companys financial assets and liabilities
that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, and
indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques the Company utilized to determine
such fair value. In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices
(unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and fair values determined by
Level 2 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in inactive markets for identical assets or
liabilities obtained from readily available pricing sources for similar instruments. The fair
values determined by Level 3 inputs are unobservable values which are supported by little or no
market activity.
10
athenahealth, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited amounts in thousands, except per-share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements At June 30, 2010, Using |
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
Cash and cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market |
|
$ |
16,784 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
16,784 |
|
Available-for-sale investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commerical paper |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
22,240 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
22,240 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
21,751 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
21,751 |
|
U.S. government backed securities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
17,466 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
17,466 |
|
Accrued contingent consideration |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(5,404 |
) |
|
|
(5,404 |
) |
Interest rate swap derivative contract |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(655 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(655 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments |
|
$ |
16,784 |
|
|
$ |
60,802 |
|
|
$ |
(5,404 |
) |
|
$ |
72,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2009, Using |
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
Cash and cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market |
|
$ |
10,081 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
10,081 |
|
Available-for-sale investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government backed securities |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
52,323 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
52,323 |
|
Accrued contingent consideration |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(5,100 |
) |
|
|
(5,100 |
) |
Interest rate swap derivative contract |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments |
|
$ |
10,081 |
|
|
$ |
52,032 |
|
|
$ |
(5,100 |
) |
|
$ |
57,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government backed securities, corporate bonds and commercial paper are valued using
a market approach based upon the quoted market prices of identical instruments when available or
other observable inputs such as trading prices of identical instruments in inactive markets or
similar securities. The interest rate swap derivative is valued using observable inputs at the
reporting date.
It is the Companys policy to recognize transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy,
if any, at the end of the reporting period however there have been no such transfers during the six
months ended June 30, 2010.
The fair value of the accrued contingent consideration was determined using a
probability-weighted income approach at the acquisition date and reporting date. That approach is
based on significant inputs that are not observable in the market, which are referred to as Level 3
inputs. Key assumptions include a discount rate of 21% and a probability adjusted level of 60%. As
of June 30, 2010, the Company has accrued a liability of $5,404 for the estimated fair value of
contingent considerations expected to be payable upon the acquired company reaching specific
performance metrics over the next three years of operation. As of June 30, 2010, the ranges of
outcomes and key assumptions have not changed materially.
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued contingent consideration balance as of January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
5,100 |
|
Increase in fair value of contingent consideration |
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued contingent consideration balance as of June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
5,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
7. INVESTMENTS
The summary of available-for-sale securities at June 30, 2010, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
Fair Value |
Commercial paper |
|
$ |
22,224 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
22,240 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
21,783 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
21,751 |
|
U.S. government backed securities |
|
|
17,461 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
17,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
61,468 |
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
61,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The summary of available-for-sale securities at December 31, 2009, is as follows:
11
athenahealth, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited amounts in thousands, except per-share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government backed securities |
|
$ |
52,280 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
52,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. LONG-TERM DEBT AND CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS
The summary of outstanding debt and capital lease obligations is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, |
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Term loan |
|
$ |
5,475 |
|
|
$ |
5,625 |
|
Capital lease obligation |
|
|
5,490 |
|
|
|
6,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,965 |
|
|
|
12,388 |
|
Less current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
|
(3,322 |
) |
|
|
(3,437 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, net of current portion |
|
$ |
7,643 |
|
|
$ |
8,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Term and Revolving Loans On September 30, 2008, the Company entered into a Credit
Agreement (the Credit Agreement) with a financial institution. The Credit Agreement consists of a
revolving credit facility in the amount of $15,000 and a term loan facility in the amount of $6,000
(collectively, the Credit Facility). The revolving credit facility may be extended by an
additional $15,000 on the satisfaction of certain conditions and includes a $10,000 sublimit for
the issuance of standby letters of credit. The revolving credit facility matures on September 30,
2011, and the term facility matures on September 30, 2013, although either facility may be
voluntarily prepaid in whole or in part at any time without premium or penalty. As of June 30,
2010, there were no amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility. On September 30,
2008, the Company borrowed a total of $6,000 under the term loan facility for general working
capital purposes. The term loan has a 5 year term which is payable quarterly starting December 31,
2008, for $75 each quarter. The Company has the option to extend the loan, subject to agreement of
the lender, at the end of the 5 year term.
The revolving credit loan and term loan bear interest, at the Companys option, at either
(i) the financial institutions London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), or (ii) the higher of
(a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% or (b) the financial institutions prime rate (the higher of
the two being the Base Rate). For term loans, these rates are adjusted down 100 basis points for
Base Rate loans and up 100 basis points for LIBOR loans. For revolving credit loans, a margin is
added to the chosen interest rate that is based on the Companys consolidated leverage ratio, as
defined in the Credit Agreement, which margin can range from 100 to 275 basis points for LIBOR
loans and from 0 to 50 basis points for Base Rate loans. A default rate shall apply on all
obligations in the event of a default under the Credit Agreement at a rate per annum equal to 2%
above the applicable interest rate. The Company was also required to pay commitment fees and
upfront fees for this Credit Facility. The interest rate as of June 30, 2010, and December 31,
2009, for the term loan was 4.5%.
The obligations of the Company and its subsidiaries under the Credit Agreement are
collateralized by substantially all assets.
The Credit Agreement also contains certain financial and nonfinancial covenants, including
limitations on our consolidated leverage ratio and capital expenditures, defaults relating to
non-payment, breach of covenants, inaccuracy of representations and warranties, default under other
indebtedness (including a cross-default with our interest rate swap), bankruptcy and insolvency,
inability to pay debtors, attachment of assets, adverse judgments, ERISA violations, invalidity of
loan and collateral documents, payments of dividends, and change of control. Upon an event of
default, the lenders may terminate the commitment to make loans and the obligation to extend
letters of credit, declare the unpaid principal amount of all outstanding loans and interest
accrued under the Credit Agreement to be immediately due and payable, require us to provide cash
and deposit account collateral for our letter of credit obligations, and exercise their security
interests and other rights under the credit agreement.
Capital Lease Obligations In June 2007, the Company entered into a master lease and security
agreement (the Equipment Line) with a financing company. The Equipment Line allows for the
Company to lease from the financing company eligible equipment purchases, submitted within 90 days
of the applicable equipments invoice date. Each lease has a 36 month term which is payable in
equal monthly installments, commencing on the first day of the fourth month after the date of the
disbursements of such loan and continuing on the first day of each month thereafter until paid in
full. The Company has accounted for these as capital leases. At June 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009, the Company had $5,490 and $6,763, respectively, of outstanding capital leases. The weighted
average interest rate implicit in the leases was 4.3%.
12
athenahealth, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited amounts in thousands, except per-share amounts)
9. INTEREST RATE DERIVATIVE
In October 2008, the Company entered into a derivative instrument which has a decreasing
notional value over the term to offset the cash flow exposure associated with its interest payments
on certain outstanding debt. Our interest rate swap is not designated as a hedging instrument. The
derivative is accounted for at fair value with gains or losses reported in earnings.
The swap had a notional amount of $5,850 to hedge changes in cash flows attributable to
changes in the LIBOR rate associated with the September 30, 2008, issuance of the Term Loan. We pay a fixed rate of 4.55% and receive a variable rate based on one month
LIBOR plus 1%. The fair value of derivatives as of June 30, 2010, is summarized in the following
table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
Fair Value |
Interest rate derivative contract |
|
Interest rate derivative liability |
|
$ |
655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effect of derivative instruments on the consolidated statement of operations for the three
months ending June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, is summarized in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Recognized in |
|
Gain Recognized in Earnings |
|
|
Location of (Loss) Gain |
|
Earnings for Three Months |
|
for Three Months Ended |
|
|
Recognized in Earnings |
|
Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
(Loss) gain on interest rate derivative contract |
|
$ |
(304 |
) |
|
$ |
308 |
|
The effect of derivative instruments on the consolidated statement of operations for the six
months ending June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, is summarized in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of (Loss) Gain |
|
(Loss) Recognized in Earnings for |
|
Gain Recognized in Earnings for |
|
|
Recognized in Earnings |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
(Loss) gain on interest rate derivative contract |
|
$ |
(364 |
) |
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives are carried at fair value, as determined using standard valuation models, and
adjusted, when necessary, for credit risk and are separately presented on the balance sheet. The
following is a description/summary of the derivative financial instrument we have entered into to
manage the interest rate exposure:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
(Fiscal |
|
Fair Value at |
Description |
|
Underlying |
|
Amount |
|
Receive |
|
Pay |
|
Entered Into |
|
Year) |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap |
|
Interest on |
|
$ |
5,475 |
|
|
LIBOR |
|
4.55% fixed |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2028 |
|
|
$ |
(655 |
) |
- variable to fixed |
|
Term Loan |
|
|
|
|
|
plus 1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
13
athenahealth, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited amounts in thousands, except per-share amounts)
In 2007, our 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (2007 ESPP) was adopted by the Board of
Directors and approved by the Companys shareholders. A total of 500 shares of common stock have
been reserved for future issuance to participating employees under the 2007 ESPP. The initial
offering period under the 2007 ESPP began March 1, 2008, and each offering period is six months.
The expense to the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2010, and 2009, was $92 and $106,
respectively. The expense to the Company for the six months ended June 30, 2010, and 2009, was
$158 and $203, respectively. Cash received from the 2007 ESPP issuances during the six months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, was $470 and $304, respectively.
Stock Option Plan
The Companys stock award plans provide the opportunity for employees, consultants, and
directors to be granted options to purchase, receive awards, or make direct purchases of shares of
the Companys common stock. In 2007, the Board of Directors and the Companys shareholders approved
the 2007 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the 2007 Stock Option Plan), effective as of the close
of our initial public offering, which occurred on September 25, 2007. The Board of Directors
authorized 1,000 shares in addition to any shares forfeited under our 2000 Stock Option Plan.
Options granted under the plan may be incentive stock options or nonqualified stock options under
the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The 2007 Stock Option Plan also allows for
granting of restricted stock unit awards under the terms of the plan. The 2007 Stock Option Plan
includes an evergreen provision that allows for an annual increase in the number of shares of
common stock available for issuance under the 2007 Stock Option Plan. On January 1, 2010, under the
evergreen provision of the 2007 Stock Option Plan, an additional 995 shares were made available
for future grant under the 2007 Stock Option Plan.
At June 30, 2010, and 2009, there were approximately 1,331 and 847 shares, respectively,
available for grant under all the Companys stock award plans.
The following table presents the stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
Weighted-Average |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Remaining Contractual |
|
Instrinsic |
|
|
Shares |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Term (in years) |
|
Value |
Stock options outstanding - January 1, 2010 |
|
|
3,432 |
|
|
$21.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options granted |
|
|
671 |
|
|
$38.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options exercised |
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
$12.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options forfeited |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
$32.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options outstanding - at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
3,755 |
|
|
$24.85 |
|
7.7 |
|
$ |
22,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options exercisable - at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
1,761 |
|
|
$16.31 |
|
6.4 |
|
$ |
21,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options vested and expected to vest at June
30, 2010 |
|
|
3,511 |
|
|
$24.28 |
|
7.6 |
|
$ |
22,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average fair value of stock options
granted for the six months ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
$19.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the value (the difference between
the closing price for the Companys common stock on June 30, 2010, and the exercise price of the
options, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the
option holders had all option holders exercised their options on June 30, 2010. The Company
recorded total stock-based compensation expense for stock options of $3,123 and $1,970 for the
three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Company recorded total stock-based
compensation expense for stock options of $5,756 and $3,789 for the six months ended June 30, 2010
and 2009, respectively.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to value share-based awards and
determine the related compensation expense. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of
share-based awards represent managements best estimates. The following table illustrates the
weighted average assumptions used to compute stock-based compensation expense for awards granted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended June 30, |
|
Six Months ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.4%-3.0 |
% |
|
|
1.9%-2.9 |
% |
|
|
2.4%-3.0 |
% |
|
|
1.9% - 2.9 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Expected option term (years) |
|
|
6.25 |
|
|
6.25 |
|
|
6.25 |
|
|
6.25 |
Expected stock volatility |
|
49% to 50% |
|
|
48.0 |
% |
|
49% to 52% |
|
48% to 49% |
14
athenahealth, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited amounts in thousands, except per-share amounts)
The risk-free interest rate estimate was based on the U.S. Treasury rates for U.S. Treasury
zero-coupon bonds with maturities similar to those of the expected term of the award being valued.
The expected dividend yield was based on our expectation of not paying dividends in the
foreseeable future. The weighted average expected option term reflects the application of the
simplified method. The simplified method defines the life as the average of the contractual term of
the options and the weighted average vesting period for all option tranches. In December 2007, the
SEC issued additional guidance, which permits entities, under certain circumstances, to continue to
use the simplified method beyond December 31, 2007. We have continued to utilize this methodology
for the six months ended June 30, 2010, due to the short length of time our common stock has been
publicly traded. The resulting fair value is recorded as compensation cost on a straight-line basis
over the requisite service period, which generally equals the option vesting period. Since the
Company completed its initial public offering in September 2007, it did not have sufficient history
as a publicly traded company to evaluate its volatility factor and expected term. As such, we
analyzed the volatilities of a group of peer companies to support the assumptions used in its
calculations. We averaged the volatilities of the peer companies with in-the-money options,
sufficient trading history and similar vesting terms to generate the assumptions.
At June 30, 2010 and 2009, there was $32,196 and $26,131, respectively, of unrecognized
stock-based compensation expense related to unvested share-based compensation stock option
arrangements granted under the Companys stock award plans. This expense is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.8 years.
Cash received from stock option exercises during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, was $156 and $160, respectively. The intrinsic value of the shares issued from option
exercises in the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, was $2,346 and $2,188, respectively,
and represents the difference between the exercise price of the option and the market price of the
Companys common stock on the dates exercised. The weighted-average grant date fair value of
options granted during the three months ended June 30, 2010, and 2009 was $18.60 and $13.28,
respectively. The Company generally issues previously unissued shares for the exercise of stock
options, however the Company may reissue previously acquired treasury shares to satisfy these
issuances in the future.
Cash received from stock option exercises during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
was $2,955 and $386, respectively. The intrinsic value of the shares issued from option exercises
in the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, was $6,803 and $5,639, respectively, and represents
the difference between the exercise price of the option and the market price of the Companys
common stock on the dates exercised. The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted
during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, was $19.88 and $13.02, respectively. The
Company generally issues previously unissued shares for the exercise of stock options, however the
Company may reissue previously acquired treasury shares to satisfy these issuances in the future.
Restricted Stock Units
The 2007 Stock Option Plan also allows for granting of restricted stock unit awards under the
terms of the plan. Such restricted units vest in four equal, annual installments on the
anniversaries of the vesting start date. The Company estimated the fair value of the restricted
stock units using the market price of its common stock on the date of the grant. The fair value of
restricted stock units is amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Grant |
|
Instrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Date Fair |
|
Value |
|
Outstanding - January 1, 2010 |
|
|
- |
|
|
$0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units granted |
|
|
228 |
|
|
$37.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units vested |
|
|
- |
|
|
$0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units cancelled |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
$36.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding - at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
216 |
|
|
$37.39 |
|
$ |
5,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010, $7,698 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to restricted
stock units is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.6 years. This amount
does not include the cost of new restricted stock units that may be granted in future periods or
any changes in the Companys forfeiture percentage. As of June 30, 2010, $695 and $780 of
compensation expense was recorded for restricted stock units during the three and six months ended
June 30, 2010, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, no restricted
stock units became vested. There were no restricted stock units outstanding during the three and
six months ended June 30, 2009.
15
athenahealth, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited amounts in thousands, except per-share amounts)
Summary of Stock-Based Compensation Expense
Total stock-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, are as follows (no amounts were capitalized):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Stock-based compensation expense charged to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating |
|
$ |
652 |
|
|
$ |
400 |
|
|
$ |
1,120 |
|
|
$ |
775 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
888 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
1,578 |
|
|
|
1,043 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
1,003 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
1,691 |
|
|
|
896 |
|
|
|
2,993 |
|
|
|
1,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,910 |
|
|
$ |
2,076 |
|
|
$ |
6,694 |
|
|
$ |
3,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes represents the Companys federal and state income tax
obligations as well as foreign tax provisions. The Companys provision for income taxes was $1,534
and $3,277 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Companys provision
for income taxes was $1,253 and $1,912 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The Company used an estimated annual tax rate of 49% and 46% to calculate the
quarterly tax provision for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Management
is required to estimate the annual effective tax rate based upon its forecast of annual pre-tax
income. To the extent that actual pre-tax results for the year differ from the forecast estimates
applied at the end of the most recent interim period, the actual tax rate recognized in fiscal year
2010 could be materially different from the forecasted rate.
The Companys policy is to record interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits
in income tax expense. As of June 30, 2010, interest or penalties related to uncertain tax
positions accrued by the Company was not material. The Company files U.S., state and foreign income
returns in jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitation. The Companys primary state
jurisdiction is the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The Company is under corporate excise tax audit
in Massachusetts for fiscal years 2006 through 2008. At the time of this filing, the Company has
not received any indication on audit related adjustments. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has
audited the Companys federal income tax filings through fiscal year 2008.
The
Company has accounted for the acquisition of Anodyne Health Partners,
Inc., as a business combination using the acquisition method.
Allocation of the purchase price for the acquisition was based on
preliminary estimates of the fair value of the net assets acquired,
including deferred tax assets and liabilities, and is subject to
adjustment upon finalization of the Companys preliminary
purchase price allocation. The preliminary allocation may be revised
as a result of additional information regarding taxes.
12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
On March 2, 2010, a complaint was filed by Prompt Medical Systems, L.P. naming the Company and
several other defendants in a patent infringement case (Prompt Medical Systems, L.P. v.
AllscriptsMisys Healthcare Solutions, Inc. et al, Civil Action No. 6:2010cv00071, United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas). The complaint alleges that we have infringed on
a patent with a listed issue date in 1996 entitled Method for Computing Current Procedural
Terminology Codes from Physician Generated Documentation and seeks an injunction enjoining
infringement, damages, and pre- and post-judgment costs and interest. The Company and two other
defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint; however, the court has not ruled on this
motion. We believe that we have meritorious defenses to the complaint and continue to contest it
vigorously.
On March 19, 2010, a putative shareholder class action complaint was filed in the United
States District Court for the District of Massachusetts against the Company and certain of its
current and former officers entitled Casula v. athenahealth, Inc. et al, Civil Action No.
1:10-cv-10477. The complaint alleges that the defendants violated the federal securities laws by
disseminating false and misleading statements through a press release, statements by senior
management, and SEC filings. The alleged false and misleading statements concern, among other
things, the amortization period for deferred implementation revenues. The complaint seeks
unspecified damages, costs, and expenses. We believe that we have meritorious defenses to the
complaint, and we will contest the claims vigorously.
In addition, from time to time we may be subject to other legal proceedings, claims, and
litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. We do not, however, currently expect that
the ultimate costs to resolve any pending matter will have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
16
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. All statements other
than statements of historical fact contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are
forward-looking statements, including those regarding expanded sales and marketing efforts; changes
in expenses related to operations, selling, marketing, research and development, general and
administrative matters, and depreciation and amortization; liquidity issues; additional
fundraising; and the expected performance period and estimated term of our client relationships, as
well as more general statements regarding our expectations for future financial and operational
performance, product and service offerings, regulatory environment, and market trends. In some
cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as may, will, should,
expects, plans, anticipates, believes, estimates, predicts, potential, or continue;
the negative of these terms; or other comparable terminology. Forward-looking statements in this
Item 2 include, without limitation, statements reflecting managements expectations for future
financial performance and operating expenditures, expected growth, profitability and business
outlook, increased sales and marketing expenses, increased cross-selling efforts among the
Companys service offerings, expected client implementations, expected certification and regulatory
approvals, the benefits of the Companys current service offerings and research and development
for new service offerings, and the benefits of current and expected
strategic sales and
marketing relationships.
Forward-looking statements are only current predictions and are subject to known and unknown
risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity,
performance, or achievements to be materially different from those anticipated by such statements.
These factors include, among other things, those set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, under the heading Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors and any
set forth below under Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors.
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements
contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results,
levels of activity, performance, or achievements. Except as required by law, we are under no duty
to update or revise any of such forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information,
future events, or otherwise, after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Restatement
With this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we have restated the following previously filed
consolidated financial statements, data, and related disclosures:
|
(1) |
|
Our consolidated statements of operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009, and the related cash flows for the
six months ended June 30, 2009 located in Part I, Item 1 of
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q; and |
|
|
(2) |
|
Our managements discussion and analysis of financial condition
and results of operations as of and for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009, contained herein. |
The restatement results from our review of revenue recognition practices. See Note 2,
Restatement and Reclassification of Previously Issued Consolidated Financial Statements of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 for a detailed discussion of the
review and effect of the restatement.
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations
incorporates the restated amounts. For this reason the data set forth in this section may not be
comparable to discussions and data in our previously filed Quarterly Reports of Form 10-Q.
Overview
athenahealth is a leading provider of Internet-based business services for physician
practices. Our service offerings are based on four integrated components: our proprietary
Internet-based software, our continually updated database of payer reimbursement process rules, our
back-office service operations that perform administrative aspects of billing and clinical data
management for physician practices, and our automated and live patient communication services. Our
principal offering, athenaCollector, automates and manages billing-related functions for physician
practices and includes a medical practice management platform. We have also developed a service
offering, athenaClinicals, which automates and manages medical-record-related functions for
physician practices and includes an electronic health record, or EHR, platform. ReminderCall, which
we added to our service suite in September 2008, is our automated appointment reminder system that
allows patients to either confirm the appointment or request rescheduling. We have now combined
ReminderCall with other automated patient messaging services, live operator services, and a patient
web portal in the first edition of our athenaCommunicator services suite that we beta launched in
2009 and made commercially available on March 17, 2010. We refer to athenaCollector as our revenue
cycle management service, athenaClinicals as our clinical cycle management service, and
athenaCommunicator as our patient cycle management service. As a complement to these services,
Anodyne Analytics, is a web-based, Software-as-a-Service business intelligence platform that
organizes and displays detailed and insightful practice performance data for decision makers at our
client practices. Our services are designed to help our clients achieve faster
reimbursement from payers, reduce error rates, increase collections, lower operating costs,
improve operational workflow controls, improve patient satisfaction and compliance, and more
efficiently manage clinical and billing information.
17
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, we generated revenue of $113.0 million from the sale
of our services compared to $86.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. For the three
months ended June 30, 2010, we generated revenue of $58.6 million from the sale of our services
compared to $45.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009. In 2009, we generated revenue
of $188.5 million from the sale of our services compared to $136.3 million in 2008. Given the scope
of our market opportunity, we have increased our spending each year on growth, innovation, and
infrastructure. Despite increased spending in these areas, higher revenue and lower operating
expenses as a percentage of revenue typically lead to greater operating income. However, the
reversal of a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets that occurred in the fourth quarter
of 2008 has had and will have an impact on net profits as our pre-tax
income now results in the recognition of proportionate income tax
expense in the income statement.
Our revenue is predominately derived from business services that we provide on an ongoing
basis. This revenue is generally determined as a percentage of payments collected by us on behalf
of our clients, so the key drivers of our revenue include growth in the number of physicians
working within our client accounts, the collections of these physicians, and the number of services
purchased. To provide these services, we incur expenses in several categories, including direct
operating, selling and marketing, research and development, general and administrative, and
depreciation and amortization expense. In general, our direct operating expense increases as our
volume of work increases, whereas our selling and marketing expense increases in proportion to our
rate of adding new accounts to our network of physician clients. Our other expense categories are
less directly related to growth of revenues and relate more to our planning for the future, our
overall business management activities, and our infrastructure.
We manage our cash and our use of credit facilities to ensure adequate liquidity,
in adherence to related financial covenants.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us
to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of
the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
periods. Significant estimates and assumptions are used for, but are not limited to: (1) revenue
recognition; including our estimated expected customer life; (2) allowance for doubtful accounts;
(3) asset impairments (4) depreciable lives of assets; (5) economic lives and fair value of leased
assets; (6) income tax reserves and valuation allowances; (7) fair value of stock options; (8)
allocation of direct and indirect cost of sales; and (9) litigation reserves. Future events and
their effects cannot be predicted with certainty, and accordingly, our accounting estimates require
the exercise of judgment. The accounting estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated
financial statements will change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as additional
information is obtained and as our operating environment changes. We evaluate and update our
assumptions and estimates on an ongoing basis and may employ outside experts to assist in our
evaluations. Actual results could differ from the estimates we have used.
Critical accounting policies are those policies that affect our more significant judgments and
estimates used in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements. We believe
our critical accounting policies include our policies regarding revenue recognition and accounts
receivable, software development costs, stock-based compensation, income taxes, goodwill and
purchased intangible assets. For a more detailed discussion of our critical accounting policies,
please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2010. For recent accounting
pronouncements, please refer to Note 3.
Financial Operations Overview
Revenue. We derive our revenue from two sources: from business services associated with our
revenue cycle, clinical cycle, patient cycle and Anodyne Analytics offerings and from
implementation and other services. Implementation and other revenue consist primarily of
professional services fees related to assisting clients with the initial implementation of our
services and for ongoing training and related support services. Business services accounted for
approximately 96% and 97% of our total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. Business services revenue are typically 2% to 8% of a practices total collections
depending upon the services purchased, the size, complexity, and other characteristics of the
practice, plus a per-statement charge for billing statements that are generated for patients.
Accordingly, business services revenue is largely driven by: the number of physician practices and
other service providers we serve, the number of physicians and other medical providers working in
those physician practices, the volume of activity and related collections of those physicians, the
mix of our services used by those physician practices and other medical providers, and our
contracted rates. We expect to increase the number of physician practices we serve through
increased sales and marketing expense, and we expect our existing clients to use more of our
services through cross-selling efforts and growth in the number of combined services sales. There
is moderate seasonality in the activity level of physician practices. Typically, discretionary use
of physician services declines in the late summer and during the holiday season, which leads to a
decline in collections by our physician clients about 30 to 50 days later. Additionally, the volume
of activity and related collections vary from year to year based in large part on the severity,
length and timing of the onset of the flu season. While we believe that the severity, length and
timing of the onset of the cold and flu season will continue to impact collections by our physician
clients, there can be no
assurance that our future sales of these products will necessarily follow historical patterns.
Implementation revenue and other revenue are largely driven by the increase in the volume of our
new business. As a result, we expect implementation and other revenue to
18
increase in absolute
terms for the foreseeable future but to remain relatively consistent as a percentage of total
revenue. None of our clients accounted for more than 10% of our total revenues for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2010, and 2009.
Direct Operating Expense. Direct operating expense consists primarily of salaries, benefits,
claim processing costs, other direct expenses, and stock-based compensation related to personnel
who provide services to clients, including staff who implements new clients. We expense
implementation costs as incurred. We include in direct operating expense all service costs
associated with athenaCollector, athenaClinicals, athenaCommunicator, ReminderCall, and Anodyne
Analytics. Although we expect that direct operating expense will increase in absolute terms for
the foreseeable future, the direct operating expense is expected to decline as a percentage of
revenue over time as we increase automation. We expect to increase our overall level of automation
as we become a larger operation, with higher volumes of work in particular functions, geographies,
and medical specialties. We include in direct operating expense the service costs associated with
our athenaClinicals offering, which includes transaction handling related to lab requisitions, lab
results entry, fax classification, and other services. We also expect these expenses to increase in
absolute terms for the foreseeable future but to decline as a percentage of revenue. This decrease
will also be driven by increased levels of automation and economies of scale. Direct operating
expense does not include allocated amounts for rent, occupancy and other indirect costs (including
building maintenance and utilities), depreciation, and amortization, except for amortization
related to purchased intangible assets.
Selling and Marketing Expense. Selling and marketing expense consists primarily of marketing
programs (including trade shows, brand messaging, and on-line initiatives) and personnel-related
expense for sales and marketing employees (including salaries, benefits, commissions, stock-based
compensation, non-billable travel, lodging, and other out-of-pocket employee-related expenses).
Although we recognize substantially all of our revenue when services have been delivered, we
recognize a large portion of our sales commission expense at the time of contract signature and at
the time our services commence. Accordingly, we incur a portion of our sales and marketing expense
prior to the recognition of the corresponding revenue. We have increased our sales and marketing
expenses from year to year and we expect to continue to increase our investment in sales and
marketing by hiring additional direct sales personnel and support personnel to add new clients and
increase sales to our existing clients and expanding awareness through paid search and other
similar initiatives. We also plan to expand our marketing activities, such as attending trade
shows, expanding user groups, and creating new printed materials. As a result, we expect that sales
and marketing expense will increase in absolute terms and will likely remain at current levels as a
percentage of total revenue in the near-term.
Research and Development Expense. Research and development expense consists primarily of
personnel-related expenses for research and development employees (including salaries, benefits,
stock-based compensation, non-billable travel, lodging, and other out-of-pocket employee-related
expenses) and consulting fees for third-party developers. We expect that in the future, research
and development expense will increase in absolute terms but not as a percentage of total revenue as
new services and more mature products require incrementally less new research and development
investment.
General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense consists primarily of
personnel-related expense for administrative employees (including salaries, benefits, stock-based
compensation, non-billable travel, lodging, and other out-of-pocket employee-related expense),
occupancy and other indirect costs (including building maintenance and utilities), and insurance
premiums; software license fees; outside professional fees for accountants, lawyers, and
consultants; and compensation for temporary employees. We expect that general and administrative
expense will increase in absolute terms as we invest in infrastructure to support our growth and
incur additional expense related to being a publicly traded company and our restatement. Though
expenses are expected to continue to rise in absolute terms, we expect general and administrative
expense to decline as a percentage of total revenue over time.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and amortization expense consists
primarily of depreciation of fixed assets and amortization of capitalized software development
costs, which we amortize over a two-year period from the time of release of related software code.
As we grow, we will continue to make capital investments in the infrastructure of the business and
we will continue to develop software that we capitalize. At the same time, because we are spreading
fixed costs over a larger client base, we expect related depreciation and amortization expense to
decline as a percentage of total revenue over time.
Other Income (Expense). Interest expense consists primarily of interest costs related to our
equipment-related term leases and our term loan and revolving loans under our credit facility,
offset by interest income on investments. Interest income represents earnings from our cash, cash
equivalents, and short-term investments. The gain (loss) on the interest rate derivative contract
represents the change in the fair market value of a derivative instrument that is not designated as
a hedge. Although this derivative has not been designated for hedge accounting, we believe that
such instrument is correlated with the underlying cash flow exposure related to variability in
interest rate movements on our term loan.
19
Results of Operations
Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business services |
|
$ |
108,964 |
|
|
$ |
84,324 |
|
|
$ |
24,640 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
Implementation and other |
|
|
4,065 |
|
|
|
2,352 |
|
|
|
1,713 |
|
|
|
73 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
113,029 |
|
|
$ |
86,676 |
|
|
$ |
26,353 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue. Total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2010, was $113.0 million, an
increase of $26.4 million, or 30%, over revenue of $86.7 million for the six months ended June 30,
2009. This increase was due almost entirely to an increase in business services revenue.
Business Services Revenue. Revenue from business services for the six months ended June 30,
2010, was $109.0 million, an increase of 29%, over revenue of $84.3 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2009. This increase was primarily due to the growth in the number of physicians and
medical providers using our services. The number of physicians using our services at June 30, 2010,
was 17,136, a net increase of 3,545, or 26%, from 13,591 physicians at June 30, 2009. The number of
active medical providers using our services at June 30, 2010, was 24,782, a net increase of 4,459,
or 22%, from 20,323 active medical providers at June 30, 2009. Also contributing to this increase
was the growth in related collections on behalf of these physicians and medical providers. The
amount of collections processed for the six months ended
June 30, 2010, was $2.7 billion, an
increase of $0.4 billion, over posted collections of $2.3 billion for the six months
ended June 30, 2009.
Implementation and Other Revenue. Revenue from implementations and other sources was $4.1
million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $1.7 million, or 73%, over revenue
of $2.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. This increase was driven by new client
implementations and increased professional services for our larger client base. The numbers of
accounts live on our revenue cycle management service, athenaCollector, at June 30, 2010, was
1,753, a net increase of 347 accounts from 1,406 accounts at June 30, 2009. The number of accounts
live on our clinical cycle management service, athenaClinicals, at
June 30, 2010, was 352, a net
increase of 172 accounts from 180 accounts at June 30, 2009. The increase in implementation and
other revenue is the result of the increase in the volume of our business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating costs |
|
$ |
47,620 |
|
|
$ |
37,958 |
|
|
$ |
9,662 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
Direct Operating Costs. Direct operating expense for the six months ended June 30, 2010,
was $47.6 million, an increase of 25%, over costs of $38.0 million for the six months ended June
30, 2009. This increase was primarily due to an increase in the number of claims that we processed
on behalf of our clients and the related expense of providing services, including transactions
expense and employee-related costs. The amount of customer collections processed for the six months ended
June 30, 2010, was $2.7 billion, an increase of
$0.4 billion, over posted customer collections of
$2.3 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Direct operating employee-related costs
increased $3.4 million from the six months ended June 30, 2009, to the six months ended June 30,
2010. This increase is primarily due to the 20% increase in headcount since June 30, 2009. We
increased the professional services headcount as part of our redesign of our client services
organization and to meet the current and anticipated demand for our services as our customer base
has expanded and includes larger medical groups. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, direct
operating expense includes $0.9 million of amortization of purchased intangibles expense related to
the purchase of certain assets through acquisitions completed in 2009 and 2008, compared to less
than $0.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2009. Stock-based compensation expense also
increased $0.3 million from the six months ended June 30, 2009 to the six months ended June 30,
2010.
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing |
|
$ |
24,753 |
|
|
$ |
15,887 |
|
|
$ |
8,866 |
|
|
|
56 |
% |
Research and development |
|
|
8,898 |
|
|
|
6,620 |
|
|
|
2,278 |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
23,080 |
|
|
|
16,595 |
|
|
|
6,485 |
|
|
|
39 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
5,077 |
|
|
|
3,437 |
|
|
|
1,640 |
|
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
61,808 |
|
|
$ |
42,539 |
|
|
$ |
19,269 |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and Marketing Expense. Selling and marketing expense for the six months ended
June 30, 2010, was $24.8 million, an increase of $8.9 million, or 56%, over costs of $15.9 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2009. This increase was primarily due to increases in stock-based
compensation expense of $0.5 million, an increase in employee-related costs and sales commission of
$4.3 million due to an increase in headcount, a $1.1 million increase in travel related expenses, a
$0.8 million increase other marketing related events, a $1.8 million increase in online and offline
marketing, and a $0.4 million increase in external partner commission payments. Our marketing and
sales headcount increased by 67% since June 30, 2009, as we hired additional sales personnel to
focus on adding new customers and increasing penetration within our existing markets.
Research and Development Expense. Research and development expense for the six months ended
June 30, 2010, was $8.9 million, an increase of $2.3 million, or 34%, over research and development
expense of $6.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. This increase was primarily due to
a $1.7 million increase in employee-related costs due to an increase in headcount, an increase in
stock-based compensation expense of $0.5 million and a $0.1 million increase in consulting related
expenses. Our research and development headcount increased 24% since June 30, 2009, as we hired
additional research and development personnel in order to upgrade and extend our service offerings
and develop new technologies.
General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense for the six months
ended June 30, 2010, was $23.1 million, an increase of $6.5 million, or 39%, over general and
administrative expenses of $16.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. This increase was
partially due to a $1.2 million increase in employee-related costs due to an increase in headcount,
an increase in stock-based compensation expense of $1.4 million, a $0.5 million increase in travel
related expenses, $0.5 million increase in facilities related expenses, and a $0.5 million increase
in bad debt expense. Our general and administrative headcount increased by 8% since June 30, 2009,
as we added personnel to support our growth. Legal, audit, insurance and consulting expenses
increased $2.1 million primarily due to $1.6 million relating to our restatement and other
additional costs of being a public company. Additionally, under new authoritative guidance on
business combinations adopted January 1, 2009, any changes in the fair value of contingent
consideration after the acquisition date affect earnings. The potential contingent consideration
of $7.7 million was recorded in the initial purchase price allocation at its estimated fair value
of $5.1 million. A portion of the contingent consideration relating to the Anodyne acquisition is
expected to be paid in 2011 and 2012 totaling $0.8 million and is presented in other long-term
liabilities. The contingent consideration will be adjusted to fair value to the amount payable
when, and if, earned. The difference between the estimated and earn-out amount will be charged or
credited to expense. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, approximately $0.3 million was
expensed relating to this contingent consideration.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense for the six months ended
June 30, 2010, was $5.1 million, an increase of 48% over depreciation and amortization expense of
$3.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. This was primarily due to higher depreciation
from fixed asset expenditures in 2010 and 2009.
Other Income (Expense). Interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2010, was $0.1
million, a decrease of $0.6 million from interest income of $0.7 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009. The decrease was directly related to the lower interest rates during 2010 and due to
a lower cash balance due to the cash paid for an acquisition of $30 million in the fourth quarter
of 2009. Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2010, and 2009 was $0.3 million and
$0.5 million, respectively, which is driven by the balance of outstanding debt. The loss on
interest rate derivative for the six months ended June 30, 2010, was less than $0.4 million,
compared to a gain on interest rate derivative for the six months ended June 30, 2009, of $0.5
million. The gain or loss on the interest rate derivative was the result of the change in the fair
market value of a derivative instrument that was not designated a hedge. Although this derivative
does not qualify for hedge accounting, we believe that the instrument is closely correlated with
the underlying exposure, thus managing the associated risk. The gains or losses from changes in the
fair value of derivative instruments that are not accounted for as hedges are recognized in
earnings.
Income Tax Provision. We recorded a provision for income taxes for the six months ended June
30, 2010, of approximately $1.5 million compared to $3.3 million for the six months ended June 30,
2009. We have provided income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, using
the expected effective tax rate for the entire year of 49% and 46%, respectively.
21
Comparison of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business services |
|
$ |
56,399 |
|
|
$ |
44,429 |
|
|
$ |
11,970 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
Implementation and other |
|
|
2,153 |
|
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
934 |
|
|
|
77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
58,552 |
|
|
$ |
45,648 |
|
|
$ |
12,904 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue. Total revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2010, was $58.6 million, an
increase of $12.9 million, or 28%, over revenue of $45.6 million for the three months ended June
30, 2009. This increase was due almost entirely to an increase in business services revenue.
Business Services Revenue. Revenue from business services for the three months ended June 30,
2010, was $56.4 million, an increase of $12.0 million, or 27%, over revenue of $44.4 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2009. This increase was primarily due to the growth in the number
of physicians and medical providers using our services. The number of physicians using our services
at June 30, 2010, was 17,136, a net increase of 3,545, or 26%, from 13,591 physicians at June 30,
2009. The number of active medical providers using our services at June 30, 2010, was 24,782, a net
increase of 4,459, or 22%, from 20,323 active medical providers at June 30, 2009. Also contributing
to this increase was the growth in related collections on behalf of these physicians and medical
providers. The amount of collections processed for the three months
ended June 30, 2010, was $1.4 billion, an increase of $0.2 billion, over posted collections of
$1.2 billion for the
three months ended June 30, 2009.
Implementation and Other Revenue. Revenue from implementations and other sources was $2.2
million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $0.9 million, or 77%, over revenue
of $1.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009. This increase was driven by new client
implementations and increased professional services for our larger client base. The numbers of
accounts live on our revenue cycle management service, athenaCollector, at June 30, 2010, was
1,753, a net increase of 347 accounts from 1,406 accounts at June 30, 2009. The number of accounts
live on our clinical cycle management service, athenaClinicals, at
June 30, 2010, was 352, a net
increase of 172 accounts from 180 accounts at June 30, 2009. The increase in implementation and
other revenue is the result of the increase in the volume of our business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating costs |
|
$ |
24,101 |
|
|
$ |
19,397 |
|
|
$ |
4,704 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
Direct Operating Costs. Direct operating expense for the three months ended June 30,
2010, was $24.1 million, an increase of $4.7 million, or 24%, over costs of $19.4 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2009. This increase was primarily due to an increase in the number of
claims that we processed on behalf of our clients and the related expense of providing services,
including transactions expense and employee-related costs. The amount
of customer collections processed for
the three months ended June 30, 2010, was $1.4 billion an
increase of $0.2 billion, over
posted customer collections of $1.2 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2009. Direct operating
employee-related costs increased $1.7 million from the three months ended June 30, 2009, to the
three months ended June 30, 2010. This increase is primarily due to the 20% increase in headcount
since June 30, 2009. We increased the professional services headcount as part of a redesign of our
client services organization and in order to meet the current and anticipated demand for our
services as our customer base has expanded and includes larger medical groups. For the three months
ended June 30, 2010, direct operating expense includes $0.5 million of amortization of purchased
intangibles expense related to the purchase of certain assets through acquisitions completed in
2009 and 2008 compared to less than $0.1 million in the three months ended June 30, 2009.
Stock-based compensation expense also increased $0.3 million from the three months ended June 30,
2009, to the three months ended June 30, 2010.
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing |
|
$ |
12,693 |
|
|
$ |
8,888 |
|
|
$ |
3,805 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
Research and development |
|
|
4,824 |
|
|
|
3,439 |
|
|
|
1,385 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
11,403 |
|
|
|
8,394 |
|
|
|
3,009 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,657 |
|
|
|
1,798 |
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
31,577 |
|
|
$ |
22,519 |
|
|
$ |
9,058 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and Marketing Expense. Selling and marketing expense for the three months ended
June 30, 2010, was $12.7 million, an increase of $3.8 million, or 43%, over costs of $8.9 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2009. This increase was primarily due
to an increase in employee-related costs and sales commission of $2.6 million due to an
increase in headcount, an increases in stock-based compensation expense of $0.3 million, an
increase in travel-related- expenses of $0.2 million, an increase in marketing related events of
$0.2 million, an increase in online and offline marketing of $0.4 million, and an increase in
external partner commission expense of $0.1 million. Our marketing and sales headcount increased by
67% since June 30, 2009, as we hired additional sales personnel to focus on adding new customers
and increasing penetration within our existing markets.
Research and Development Expense. Research and development expense for the three months ended
June 30, 2010, was $4.8 million, an increase of $1.4 million, or 40%, over research and development
expense of $3.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009. This increase was primarily due
to a $1.0 million increase in employee-related costs due to an increase in headcount and an
increase in stock-based compensation expense of $0.4 million. Our research and development
headcount increased 24% since June 30, 2009, as we hired additional research and development
personnel in order to upgrade and extend our service offerings and develop new technologies.
General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense for the three months
ended June 30, 2010, was $11.4 million, an increase of $3.0 million, or 36%, over general and
administrative expenses of $8.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009. This increase
was partially due to a $0.5 million increase in employee-related costs due to an increase in
headcount, an increase in stock-based compensation expense of $0.8 million, a $0.3 million increase
in travel related expenses, $0.3 million increase in facilities related expenses, and a $0.2
million increase in bad debt expense. Additionally, legal, audit, insurance and consulting expenses
increased $0.9 million primarily due to $0.6 million relating to our restatement and other
additional costs relating to being a public company. Our general and administrative headcount
increased by 8% since June 30, 2009, as we added personnel to support our growth.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense for the three months
ended June 30, 2010, was $2.7 million, an increase of $0.9 million, or 48%, over depreciation and
amortization expense of $1.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009. This was primarily
due to higher depreciation from fixed asset expenditures in 2010 and 2009.
Other Income (Expense). Interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2010, was $0.1
million, a decrease of $0.2 million from interest income of $0.3 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2009. The decrease was directly related to the lower interest rates during 2010 and due to
a lower cash balance due to the cash paid for an acquisition of $30 million in the fourth quarter
of 2009. Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2010, and 2009 was $0.1 million and
$0.3 million, respectively, which is driven by the balance of outstanding debt. The loss on
interest rate derivative for the three months ended June 30, 2010, was $0.3 million, compared to a
gain on interest rate derivative for the three months ended June 30, 2009, of $0.3 million. The
gain or loss on the interest rate derivative was the result of the change in the fair market value
of a derivative instrument that was not designated a hedge. Although this derivative does not
qualify for hedge accounting, we believe that the instrument is closely correlated with the
underlying exposure, thus managing the associated risk. The gains or losses from changes in the
fair value of derivative instruments that are not accounted for as hedges are recognized in
earnings.
Income Tax Provision. We recorded a provision for income taxes for the three months ended
June 30, 2010, of approximately $1.3 million compared to $1.9 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2009. We have provided income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, using the expected effective tax rate for the entire year of 49% and 46%, respectively.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Although we have historically funded our operations through the private and public sale of
$131.9 million in equity securities, as well as through long-term debt, working capital, and
equipment-financing loans, our recent growth has been sustained by our continued profitability
since the third quarter of 2007. As of June 30, 2010, our principal sources of liquidity were cash
and cash equivalents and short-term investments totaling $89.4 million. Our total indebtedness was
$11.0 million at June 30, 2010, and was comprised of capital lease obligations of $5.5 million and
a term loan of $5.5 million.
23
Cash provided by operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2010, was
$15.2 million and consisted of net income of $1.6 million and $13.6 million utilized by working
capital and other non-cash charges. Cash provided by operating activities included positive
non-cash adjustments of $6.0 million related to depreciation and amortization expense, a
$6.7 million non-cash stock-based compensation expense, a $0.3 million non-cash expense for the
change in the fair value of contingent consideration, a $0.7 million amortization of premiums on
investments, a $0.4 million non-cash loss on interest rate derivative, and $0.4 million for a
provision for uncollectible accounts. Negative non-cash adjustment related to excess tax benefit
from stock-based awards of $1.3 million and a $0.4 million tax provision. Cash provided by working
capital and other activities was primarily attributable to a $4.9 million increase in deferred
revenue, a $0.1 million increase in accounts payable, and a
$0.3 million decrease in other long-term assets
offset by a $0.9 million decrease in accrued expense, a $0.6 million decrease in deferred rent, a
$0.6 million increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets, and $2.4 million increase in
accounts receivable. These changes are largely attributable to growth in the size of our business
and in related direct operating expense.
Cash provided by operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2009, was
$12.0 million and consisted of net income of $3.8 million and $8.2 million utilized by working
capital and other non-cash charges. Cash provided by operating activities included positive
non-cash adjustments of $3.6 million related to depreciation and amortization expense, a
$4.0 million non-cash stock-based compensation expense, a $2.9 million tax provision, and a $0.2
million for a provision for uncollectible accounts. Negative non-cash adjustments related to
amortization of discounts on investments of $0.4 million, excess tax benefit from stock-based
awards of $1.2 million, and a $0.5 million non-cash gain on interest rate derivative. Cash used by
working capital and other activities was primarily attributable to a $0.8 million increase in
accounts payable and $0.6 million increase in accounts receivable offset by $1.4 million decrease
in accrued expense, a $0.5 million decrease in deferred rent, a $1.3 million increase in prepaid
expenses and other current assets, and a $2.8 million increase in deferred revenue. These changes
are largely attributable to growth in the size of our business and in related direct operating
expense.
Net cash used in investing activities was $20.7 million for the six months ended June 30,
2010, which consisted of purchases of short-term investments of $60.4 million, purchases of
property and equipment of $9.9 million (including an airplance purchase of $3.1 million), and
expenditures for internal development of the athenaClinicals and athenaCommunicator applications of
$1.6 million. This is offset in part by a $0.3 million decrease in restricted cash, $0.4 million in
proceeds from the sale and disposal of equipment, and
$50.5 million in proceeds from the maturity.
of investments.
Net cash used in investing activities was $17.2 million for the six months ended June 30,
2009, which consisted of purchases of investments of $51.8 million, purchases of property and
equipment of $5.1 million, and expenditures for internal development of the athenaClinicals
application of $1.1 million. This is offset in part by a $0.3 million decrease in restricted cash,
$3.4 million in proceeds from the sale and disposal of equipment, and $37.0 million in proceeds
from the sale and maturity of investments.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $2.9 million for the six months ended June 30,
2010. The majority of the cash provided in the period resulted from proceeds from the exercise of
stock options and proceeds from our employee stock purchase plan during the period totaling
$3.4 million and excess tax benefit from stock-based awards of $1.3 million, offset by $1.8 million
in payments on debt and capital lease obligations.
Net cash used in financing activities was $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
The majority of the cash used in the period resulted from $2.3 million in payments on debt and
capital lease obligations. Cash provided by the period relates to proceeds from the exercise of
stock options and proceeds from our employee stock purchase plan during the period totaling
$0.7 million and excess tax benefit from stock-based awards of $1.2 million.
Given our profitability over the past years and our current cash and cash equivalents,
short-term investments, accounts receivable, and funds available under our existing revolving
credit facility with Bank of America, N.A., we believe that we will have sufficient liquidity to
fund our business and meet our contractual obligations for the foreseeable future. We may increase
our capital expenditures consistent with our anticipated growth in infrastructure and personnel,
and as we expand our national presence. In addition, we may pursue acquisitions or investments in
complementary businesses or technologies or experience unexpected operating losses, in which case
we may need to raise additional funds sooner than expected. Accordingly, we may need to engage in
private or public equity or debt financings to secure additional funds. If we raise additional
funds through further issuances of equity or convertible debt securities, our existing stockholders
could suffer significant dilution, and any new equity securities we issue could have rights,
preferences, and privileges superior to those of holders of our common stock. Any debt financing
obtained by us in the future could involve restrictive covenants relating to our capital-raising
activities and other financial and operational matters, which may make it more difficult for us to
obtain additional capital and to pursue business opportunities, including potential acquisitions.
Beyond the twelve-month period, we intend to maintain sufficient liquidity through continued
improvements in the size and profitability of our business and through prudent management of our
cash resources and our credit arrangements.
We make investments in property and equipment and in software development on an ongoing basis.
Our property and equipment investments consist primarily of technology infrastructure to provide
capacity for expansion of our client base, including computers and related equipment in our data
centers and infrastructure in our service operations. Our software development investments consist
primarily of company-managed design, development, testing, and deployment of new application
functionality. Because the practice management component of athenaNet is considered mature, we
expense nearly all software maintenance costs for this component of
24
our platform as incurred. For the EHR component of athenaNet, which is the platform for our
athenaClinicals offering, and for the patient cycle component of athenaNet, which is the platform
for our athenaCommunicator offering, we capitalize nearly all software development. In the six
months ended June 30, 2010, we capitalized $9.8 million in property and equipment (including an
airplance purchase of $3.1 million) and $1.6 million in software development. In the six months
ended June 30, 2009, we capitalized $5.1 million of property and equipment and $1.1 million of
software development. We currently anticipate making aggregate capital expenditures of
approximately $17 million over the next twelve months.
Credit Facilities
Term and Revolving Loans
On September 30, 2008, we entered into a credit agreement with Bank of America, N.A. This
credit agreement consists of a revolving credit facility in the amount of $15.0 million and a term
loan facility in the amount of $6.0 million. The revolving credit facility may be extended by up to
an additional $15.0 million on the satisfaction of certain conditions and includes a $10.0 million
sublimit for the issuance of standby letters of credit. The revolving credit facility matures on
September 30, 2011, and the term facility matures on September 30, 2013, although either facility
may be voluntarily prepaid in whole or in part at any time without premium or penalty. On September
30, 2008, we borrowed a total of $6.0 million under the term loan facility for general working
capital purposes. As of June 30, 2010, there were no amounts outstanding under the revolving credit
facility.
The revolving credit loans and term loans bear interest, at our option, at either (i) the
British Bankers Association London Interbank Offered Rate (known as LIBOR), or (ii) the higher of
(a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% or (b) Bank of Americas prime rate. For term loans, these
rates are adjusted up 100 basis points for LIBOR loans and down 100 basis points for all other
loans. For revolving credit loans, a margin is added to the chosen interest rate that is based on
our consolidated leverage ratio, as defined in the credit agreement, which margin can range from
100 to 275 basis points for LIBOR loans and from 0 to 50 basis points for all other loans. A
default rate shall apply on all obligations in the event of a default under the credit agreement at
an annual rate equal to 2% above the applicable interest rate. We were also required to pay other
customary commitment fees and upfront fees for this credit facility. The interest rate as of June
30, 2010, for the term loan and for the revolving credit facility was 4.5%.
The obligations of the Company and its subsidiaries under the Credit Agreement are
collateralized by substantially all assets.
The Credit Agreement also contains certain financial and nonfinancial covenants, including
limitations on our consolidated leverage ratio and capital expenditures, defaults relating to
non-payment, breach of covenants, inaccuracy of representations and warranties, default under other
indebtedness (including a cross-default with our interest rate swap), bankruptcy and insolvency,
inability to pay debtors, attachment of assets, adverse judgments, ERISA violations, invalidity of
loan and collateral documents, payments of dividends, and change of control. Upon an event of
default, the lenders may terminate the commitment to make loans and the obligation to extend
letters of credit, declare the unpaid principal amount of all outstanding loans and interest
accrued under the Credit Agreement to be immediately due and payable, require us to provide cash
and deposit account collateral for our letter of credit obligations, and exercise their security
interests and other rights under the credit agreement. As of June 30, 2010, we were in
compliance with our covenants under the credit agreement.
Capital Leases
As of June 30, 2010, there was a total of $5.5 million in aggregate principal amount
outstanding under a series of capital leases with one financing company. The weighted average
implicit rate in the leases are 4.3% per annum, and they are payable on a monthly basis through
March 2013.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, we did not have any relationships with
unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as
structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the
purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited
purposes. Other than our operating leases for office space and computer equipment, we do not engage
in off-balance sheet financing arrangements.
The summary of outstanding contractual obligations as of June 30, 2010, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
year |
|
|
1-3 years |
|
|
3-5 years |
|
|
years |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
5,475 |
|
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
$ |
600 |
|
|
$ |
4,575 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
5,490 |
|
|
|
3,021 |
|
|
|
2,469 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Operating lease
obligations |
|
|
28,320 |
|
|
|
5,448 |
|
|
|
10,681 |
|
|
|
10,743 |
|
|
|
1,448 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other |
|
|
986 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
986 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
40,271 |
|
|
$ |
8,769 |
|
|
$ |
13,750 |
|
|
$ |
15,318 |
|
|
$ |
1,448 |
|
|
$ |
986 |
|
|
|
|
25
These amounts exclude interest payments of $0.3 million that are due in the next five years on
our long-term debt.
These amounts exclude interest payments of $1.3 million that are due in the next three years
on capital lease obligations.
The commitments under our operating leases shown above consist primarily of lease payments for
our Watertown, Massachusetts, corporate headquarters; our Rome,
Georgia and Alpharetta, Georgia offices; and our Chennai,
India subsidiary location.
Other amount consists of uncertain tax benefits relating to research and development credits.
We have not utilized these credits, nor do we have an expectation of when these credits would be
challenged. As of June 30, 2010, we cannot reasonably estimate when any future cash outlays would
occur related to these uncertain tax positions.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk. Our results of operations and cash flows are subject to
fluctuations due to changes in the Indian rupee. None of our consolidated revenues are generated
outside the United States. None of our vendor relationships, including our contracts with our
offshore service providers International Business Machines Corporation and Vision Business Process
Solutions, Inc., a subsidiary of Dell, Inc. (formerly Perot Systems Corporation), for work
performed in India and the Philippines, is denominated in any currency other than the U.S. dollar.
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, less than 1% of our expenses occurred in our direct
subsidiary in Chennai, India, and was incurred in Indian rupees. We therefore believe that the risk
of a significant impact on our operating income from foreign currency fluctuations is not
substantial.
Interest Rate Sensitivity. We had unrestricted cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments totaling $89.4 million at June 30, 2010. These amounts are held for working capital
purposes and were invested primarily in deposits, money market funds, and short-term,
interest-bearing, investment-grade securities. Due to the short-term nature of these investments,
we believe that we do not have any material exposure to changes in the fair value of our investment
portfolio as a result of changes in interest rates. The value of these securities, however, will be
subject to interest rate risk and could fall in value if interest rates rise.
Interest Rate Risk. As of June 30, 2010, we had long-term debt and capital lease obligations
totaling $11.0 million, which have both variable and fixed interest rate components. We have
entered into an interest rate swap intended to mitigate variability in interest rate movements on
our term loan. The swap has an amortizing notional amount over the swap agreement. For floating
rate debt, interest rate changes generally do not affect the fair market value, but do impact
future earnings and cash flows, assuming other factors are held constant.
The table below summarizes the principal terms of our interest rate swap transaction,
including the notional amount of the swap, the interest rate payment we receive from and pay to our
swap counterparty, the term of the transaction, and its fair market value at June 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
|
(Fiscal |
|
|
Fair Value at |
|
Description |
|
Underlying |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Receive |
|
|
Pay |
|
|
Entered Into |
|
|
Year) |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap |
|
Interest on |
|
$ |
5,475 |
|
|
LIBOR |
|
4.55% fixed |
|
2008 |
|
2028 |
|
$ |
(655 |
) |
- variable to fixed |
|
Term Loan |
|
|
|
|
|
plus 1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2010, there were no amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility;
however, we can draw up to $15.0 million under this line of credit at any time. At June 30, 2010,
there was $5.5 million outstanding on the term loan. If we had drawn the total available amount,
and if the prime rate thereon had fluctuated by 10%, the interest expense would have fluctuated by
approximately $0.1 million.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934 is processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules
and forms. As of June 30, 2010 (the Evaluation Date), our management, with the participation of
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934). Our management recognizes that any
controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable
assurance of achieving their objectives, and management necessarily applies its judgment in
evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded based upon the evaluation described above that,
as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable
assurance level.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting for the quarter
ended June 30, 2010, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
26
PART IIOTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
On March 2, 2010, a complaint was filed by Prompt Medical Systems, L.P. naming the Company and
several other defendants in a patent infringement case (Prompt Medical Systems, L.P. v.
AllscriptsMisys Healthcare Solutions, Inc. et al, Civil Action No. 6:2010cv00071, United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas). The complaint alleges that we have infringed on
a patent with a listed issue date in 1996 entitled Method for Computing Current Procedural
Terminology Codes from Physician Generated Documentation and seeks an injunction enjoining
infringement, damages, and pre- and post-judgment costs and interest. The Company and two other
defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint; however, the court has not ruled on this
motion. We believe that we have meritorious defenses to the complaint and continue to contest it
vigorously.
On March 19, 2010, a putative shareholder class action complaint was filed in the United
States District Court for the District of Massachusetts against the Company and certain of its
current and former officers entitled Casula v. athenahealth, Inc. et al, Civil Action No.
1:10-cv-10477. The complaint alleges that the defendants violated the federal securities laws by
disseminating false and misleading statements through a press release, statements by senior
management, and SEC filings. The alleged false and misleading statements concern, among other
things, the amortization period for deferred implementation revenues. The complaint seeks
unspecified damages, costs, and expenses. We believe that we have meritorious defenses to the
complaint, and we will contest the claims vigorously.
In addition, from time to time we may be subject to other legal proceedings, claims, and
litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. We do not, however, currently expect that
the ultimate costs to resolve any pending matter will have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should consider
carefully the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information
in this filing, including the consolidated financial statements and the related notes appearing in
this and other filings that we have made with the SEC, before deciding to invest in shares of our
common stock. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition,
results of operations, and future prospects could be materially and adversely affected. In that
event, the market price of our common stock could decline and you could lose part or all of your
investment.
In Item 1A (Risk Factors) of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2010,
we describe risk factors related to the Company. The following risk factors are either new or have
changed materially from those set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009. You should carefully review the risks involved and those described in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K and in other reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission in
evaluating our business.
Our operating results have in the past and may continue to fluctuate significantly, and if we
fail to meet the expectations of analysts or investors, our stock price and the value of your
investment could decline substantially.
Our operating results are likely to fluctuate, and if we fail to meet or exceed the
expectations of securities analysts or investors, the trading price of our common stock could
decline. Moreover, our stock price may be based on expectations of our future performance that may
be unrealistic or that may not be met. Some of the important factors that could cause our revenues
and operating results to fluctuate from quarter to quarter include:
|
|
|
the extent to which our services achieve or maintain market acceptance; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to introduce new services and enhancements to our existing services on a
timely basis; |
|
|
|
|
new competitors and the introduction of enhanced products and services from new or
existing competitors; |
|
|
|
|
the length of our contracting and implementation cycles; |
|
|
|
|
changes in Client Days in Accounts Receivable; |
|
|
|
|
the severity, length, and timing of seasonal and pandemic illnesses; |
|
|
|
|
seasonal declines in the use of physician services, generally in the late summer and
during the holiday season, which lead to a decline in collections by our physician clients
about 30 to 50 days later; |
|
|
|
|
the financial condition of our current and potential clients; |
|
|
|
|
changes in client budgets and procurement policies; |
|
|
|
|
the amount and timing of our investment in research and development activities; |
|
|
|
|
the amount and timing of our investment in sales and marketing activities; |
|
|
|
|
technical difficulties or interruptions in our services; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to hire and retain qualified personnel and maintain an adequate rate of
expansion of our sales force; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the regulatory environment related to healthcare; |
|
|
|
|
regulatory compliance costs; |
|
|
|
|
the timing, size, and integration success of potential future acquisitions; and |
|
|
|
|
unforeseen legal expenses, including litigation and settlement costs. |
Many of these factors are not within our control, and the occurrence of one or more of them
might cause our operating results to vary widely. As such, we believe that quarter-to-quarter
comparisons of our revenues and operating results may not be meaningful and should not be relied
upon as an indication of future performance.
27
A significant portion of our operating expense is relatively fixed in nature, and planned
expenditures are based in part on expectations regarding future revenue and profitability.
Accordingly, unexpected revenue shortfalls, lower
than expected revenue increases as a result of planned expenditures, and longer than expected
impact on profitability and margins as a result of planned revenue expenditures may decrease our
gross margins and profitability and could cause significant changes in our operating results from
quarter to quarter. In addition, our future quarterly operating results may fluctuate and may not
meet the expectations of securities analysts or investors. If this occurs, the trading price of our
common stock could fall substantially either suddenly or over time.
We may be sued by third parties for alleged infringement of their proprietary rights.
The software and Internet industries are characterized by the existence of a large number of
patents, trademarks, and copyrights and by frequent litigation based on allegations of infringement
or other violations of intellectual property rights. Moreover, our business involves the systematic
gathering and analysis of data about the requirements and behaviors of payers and other third
parties, some or all of which may be claimed to be confidential or proprietary. We have received in
the past, and may receive in the future, communications from third parties claiming that we have
infringed on the intellectual property rights of others. For example, a complaint was recently
filed by Prompt Medical Systems, L.P. naming us and several other defendants alleging infringement
of its patent with a listed issue date in 1996 entitled Method for Computing Current Procedural
Terminology Codes from Physician Generated Documentation. For additional information regarding
this litigation, see Part II, Item I, Legal Proceedings. Our technologies may not be able to
withstand such third-party claims of rights against their use. Any intellectual property claims,
with or without merit, could be time-consuming and expensive to resolve, divert management
attention from executing our business plan, and require us to pay monetary damages or enter into
royalty or licensing agreements. In addition, many of our contracts contain warranties with respect
to intellectual property rights, and some require us to indemnify our clients for third-party
intellectual property infringement claims, which would increase the cost to us of an adverse ruling
on such a claim.
Moreover, any settlement or adverse judgment resulting from such a claim could require us to
pay substantial amounts of money or obtain a license to continue to use the technology or
information that is the subject of the claim, or otherwise restrict or prohibit our use of the
technology or information. There can be no assurance that we would be able to obtain a license on
commercially reasonable terms, if at all, from third parties asserting an infringement claim; that
we would be able to develop alternative technology on a timely basis, if at all; or that we would
be able to obtain a license to use a suitable alternative technology to permit us to continue
offering, and our clients to continue using, our affected services. Accordingly, an adverse
determination could prevent us from offering our services to others. In addition, we may be
required to indemnify our clients for third-party intellectual property infringement claims, which
would increase the cost to us of an adverse ruling for such a claim.
Current and future litigation against us could be costly and time-consuming to defend.
We may from time to time be subject to legal proceedings and claims that arise in the
ordinary course of business, such as claims brought by our clients in connection with commercial
disputes and employment claims made by our current or former employees. Claims may also be asserted
by or on behalf of a variety of other parties, including patients of our physician clients,
government agencies, or stockholders. For example, on March 19, 2010, a putative shareholder class
action complaint was filed against us and certain of our current and former officers in the United
States District Court for the District of Massachusetts alleging violation of the federal
securities laws by dissemination of false and misleading statements. For additional information
regarding this litigation, see Part II, Item I, Legal Proceedings.
Any litigation involving us may result in substantial costs and may divert managements
attention and resources, which may seriously harm our business, overall financial condition, and
operating results. Insurance may not cover existing or future claims, be sufficient to fully
compensate us for one or more of such claims, or continue to be available on terms acceptable to
us. A claim brought against us that is uninsured or underinsured could result in unanticipated
costs, thereby reducing our operating results and leading analysts or potential investors to reduce
their expectations of our performance resulting in a reduction in the trading price of our stock.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Not applicable.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
Not applicable.
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved).
Item 5. Other Information.
Not applicable.
Item 6. Exhibits.
(a) Exhibits.
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Exhibit Index |
|
|
|
|
10.1(i)
|
|
The athenahealth Executive Incentive Plan |
10.2**
|
|
Director Compensation Plan of the Registrant, dated June 17, 2010 |
31.1**
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14 Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
31.2**
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14 Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
32.1**
|
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to Exchange Act rules 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)
and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
|
|
|
|
|
Indicates a management contract or any compensatory plan, contract, or arrangement. |
(i)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants current report on Form 8-K, filed April 5, 2010. |
**
|
|
Filed herewith |
28
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATHENAHEALTH, INC.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Jonathan Bush
|
|
|
|
Jonathan Bush |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chairman |
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Timothy M. Adams
|
|
|
|
Timothy M. Adams, |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President |
|
Date: July 23, 2010
29