e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
For the quarter ended June 30, 2011
of
ARRIS GROUP, INC.
A Delaware Corporation
IRS Employer Identification No. 58-2588724
SEC File Number 000-31254
3871 Lakefield Drive
Suwanee, GA 30024
(678) 473-2000
ARRIS Group, Inc. (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
ARRIS Group, Inc. is a large accelerated filer and is not a shell company.
ARRIS is required to submit electronically and post on its corporate web site Interactive Data
Files required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of regulation S-T.
As of July 31, 2011, 119,358,933 shares of the registrants Common Stock, $0.01 par value, were
outstanding.
ARRIS GROUP, INC.
FORM 10-Q
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
INDEX
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
ARRIS GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share data) (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
360,281 |
|
|
$ |
353,121 |
|
Short-term investments, at fair value |
|
|
231,254 |
|
|
|
266,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments |
|
|
591,535 |
|
|
|
620,102 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
3,646 |
|
|
|
4,937 |
|
Accounts receivable (net of allowances for doubtful
accounts of $1,532 in 2011 and $1,649 in 2010) |
|
|
152,436 |
|
|
|
125,933 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
6,528 |
|
Inventories (net of reserves of $16,369 in 2011 and $16,316 in 2010) |
|
|
113,020 |
|
|
|
101,763 |
|
Prepaids |
|
|
10,272 |
|
|
|
9,237 |
|
Current deferred income tax assets |
|
|
22,681 |
|
|
|
19,819 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
25,216 |
|
|
|
33,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
919,212 |
|
|
|
921,373 |
|
Property, plant and equipment (net of accumulated
depreciation of $120,513 in 2011 and $109,267 in 2010) |
|
|
57,100 |
|
|
|
56,306 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
233,440 |
|
|
|
234,964 |
|
Intangible assets (net of accumulated amortization of $244,567
in 2011 and $226,679 in 2010) |
|
|
150,728 |
|
|
|
168,616 |
|
Investments |
|
|
34,237 |
|
|
|
31,015 |
|
Noncurrent deferred income tax assets |
|
|
9,839 |
|
|
|
6,293 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
5,878 |
|
|
|
5,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,410,434 |
|
|
$ |
1,424,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
27,825 |
|
|
$ |
50,736 |
|
Accrued compensation, benefits and related taxes |
|
|
20,832 |
|
|
|
28,778 |
|
Accrued warranty |
|
|
3,300 |
|
|
|
2,945 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
47,166 |
|
|
|
31,625 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
17,805 |
|
|
|
18,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
116,928 |
|
|
|
132,931 |
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion |
|
|
208,336 |
|
|
|
202,615 |
|
Accrued pension |
|
|
17,730 |
|
|
|
17,213 |
|
Noncurrent income tax liability |
|
|
21,844 |
|
|
|
17,702 |
|
Noncurrent deferred income tax liabilities |
|
|
24,808 |
|
|
|
29,151 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
17,367 |
|
|
|
15,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
407,013 |
|
|
|
415,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share, 5.0 million shares
authorized; none issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 320.0 million
shares authorized; 119.2 million and 120.8 million
shares issued and outstanding in 2011 and 2010,
respectively |
|
|
1,443 |
|
|
|
1,409 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
1,228,729 |
|
|
|
1,206,157 |
|
Treasury stock at cost, 24.8 million and 19.8 million shares in 2011 and 2010, respectively |
|
|
(202,933 |
) |
|
|
(145,286 |
) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(19,351 |
) |
|
|
(47,606 |
) |
Unrealized gain on marketable securities (net of
accumulated tax effect of $878 and $224 in 2011 and
2010, respectively) |
|
|
1,530 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
Unfunded pension liability (net of accumulated tax
effect of $662 in 2011 and 2010) |
|
|
(5,813 |
) |
|
|
(5,813 |
) |
Cumulative translation adjustments |
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,003,421 |
|
|
|
1,009,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,410,434 |
|
|
$ |
1,424,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
2
ARRIS GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data and percentages) (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
228,635 |
|
|
$ |
248,179 |
|
|
$ |
463,581 |
|
|
$ |
488,321 |
|
Services |
|
|
37,164 |
|
|
|
32,176 |
|
|
|
69,654 |
|
|
|
58,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
|
265,799 |
|
|
|
280,355 |
|
|
|
533,235 |
|
|
|
547,052 |
|
Cost of sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
140,259 |
|
|
|
151,873 |
|
|
|
293,014 |
|
|
|
291,693 |
|
Services |
|
|
18,642 |
|
|
|
15,204 |
|
|
|
36,377 |
|
|
|
29,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,901 |
|
|
|
167,077 |
|
|
|
329,391 |
|
|
|
321,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
106,898 |
|
|
|
113,278 |
|
|
|
203,844 |
|
|
|
225,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
35,868 |
|
|
|
34,458 |
|
|
|
72,706 |
|
|
|
69,576 |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
36,629 |
|
|
|
35,538 |
|
|
|
72,669 |
|
|
|
69,903 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
8,944 |
|
|
|
9,022 |
|
|
|
17,888 |
|
|
|
18,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
81,441 |
|
|
|
79,039 |
|
|
|
163,263 |
|
|
|
157,595 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
25,457 |
|
|
|
34,239 |
|
|
|
40,581 |
|
|
|
68,194 |
|
Other expense (income): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
4,180 |
|
|
|
4,765 |
|
|
|
8,405 |
|
|
|
9,195 |
|
Loss (gain) on investments |
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
(757 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
(886 |
) |
|
|
(696 |
) |
|
|
(1,664 |
) |
|
|
(1,070 |
) |
Loss on foreign currency |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
967 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
Gain on debt retirement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(115 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
(532 |
) |
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations before income taxes |
|
|
22,837 |
|
|
|
29,845 |
|
|
|
34,162 |
|
|
|
60,199 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
6,147 |
|
|
|
10,071 |
|
|
|
5,908 |
|
|
|
21,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
16,690 |
|
|
$ |
19,774 |
|
|
$ |
28,254 |
|
|
$ |
38,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
121,800 |
|
|
|
126,584 |
|
|
|
122,047 |
|
|
|
126,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
123,711 |
|
|
|
129,717 |
|
|
|
124,720 |
|
|
|
129,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
3
ARRIS GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands) (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
28,254 |
|
|
$ |
38,765 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
11,668 |
|
|
|
11,056 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
17,888 |
|
|
|
18,043 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
11,209 |
|
|
|
10,273 |
|
Deferred income tax provision (benefit) |
|
|
(11,403 |
) |
|
|
(2,341 |
) |
Amortization of deferred finance fees |
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
292 |
|
Gain on investments |
|
|
(757 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
Loss on disposal of fixed assets |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Excess income tax benefits from stock-based compensation plans |
|
|
(3,247 |
) |
|
|
(2,647 |
) |
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
5,721 |
|
|
|
5,767 |
|
Gain on debt retirement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(115 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of
acquisitions and dispositions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(26,503 |
) |
|
|
3,743 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
6,117 |
|
|
|
(1,170 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(11,257 |
) |
|
|
17,021 |
|
Income taxes payable and recoverable |
|
|
12,591 |
|
|
|
(3,008 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(15,480 |
) |
|
|
(19,623 |
) |
Prepaids and other, net |
|
|
2,649 |
|
|
|
6,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
27,809 |
|
|
|
83,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(12,547 |
) |
|
|
(10,265 |
) |
Cash proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
|
(142,841 |
) |
|
|
(231,086 |
) |
Sales of short-term investments |
|
|
179,431 |
|
|
|
55,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
24,086 |
|
|
|
(185,954 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of debt obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
Early redemption of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,800 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(57,647 |
) |
|
|
(23,685 |
) |
Excess income tax benefits from stock-based compensation plans |
|
|
3,247 |
|
|
|
2,647 |
|
Repurchase of shares to satisfy tax withholdings |
|
|
(8,245 |
) |
|
|
(6,425 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net |
|
|
17,910 |
|
|
|
5,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(44,735 |
) |
|
|
(27,086 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
7,160 |
|
|
|
(129,633 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
353,121 |
|
|
|
500,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
360,281 |
|
|
$ |
370,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
4
ARRIS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and Basis of Presentation
ARRIS Group, Inc. (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, except as the context otherwise
indicates, ARRIS or the Company) is a global communications technology company headquartered in
Suwanee, Georgia. ARRIS operates in three business segments, Broadband Communications Systems,
Access, Transport & Supplies, and Media & Communications Systems, specializing in integrated
broadband network solutions that include products, systems and software for content and operations
management (including video on demand, or VOD), and professional services. ARRIS is a leading
developer, manufacturer and supplier of telephony, data, video, construction, rebuild and
maintenance equipment for the broadband communications industry. In addition, ARRIS is a leading
supplier of infrastructure products used by cable system operators to build-out and maintain hybrid
fiber-coaxial (HFC) networks. The Company provides its customers with products and services that
enable reliable, high speed, two-way broadband transmission of video, telephony, and data.
The condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring accruals) that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of
the consolidated financial statements for the periods shown. Interim results of operations are not
necessarily indicative of results to be expected for a twelve-month period. These financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys most recently audited consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC).
Note 2. Impact of Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance regarding the
presentation of comprehensive income. This guidance requires presentation of total comprehensive
income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a
single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements.
The guidance is effective on a retrospective basis for the interim and annual periods ending on or
after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this guidance will not have a significant impact on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
In May 2011, FASB issued amendments to some fair value measurement principles and disclosure
requirements for fair value measurements. The provisions of this guidance are effective for the
interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this guidance
will not have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Note 3. Investments
ARRIS investments as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, |
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
231,254 |
|
|
$ |
266,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
30,237 |
|
|
|
27,015 |
|
Cost method investments |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,237 |
|
|
|
31,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
265,491 |
|
|
$ |
297,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARRIS investments in debt and marketable equity securities are categorized as available-for-sale.
The Company currently does not hold any held-to-maturity securities. Realized gains and losses on
trading securities and
5
available-for-sale securities are included in net income. Unrealized gains
and losses on available-for-sale
securities are included in our consolidated balance sheet as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss). The total gains included in the accumulated other comprehensive
income related to available-for-sale securities were $2.4 million and $0.6 million as of June 30,
2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The amortized cost basis of the Companys investments
approximates fair value.
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, ARRIS cost method investment is an investment in a
private company, which is recorded at cost of $4.0 million. Each quarter ARRIS evaluates its
investment for any other-than-temporary impairment, by reviewing the current revenues, bookings and
long-term plan of the private company. In the third quarter of 2010, the private company raised
additional financing at the same price and terms on which ARRIS had invested. As of June 30, 2011,
ARRIS believes there has been no other-than-temporary impairment but will continue to evaluate the
investment for impairment. Due to the fact the investment is in a private company, ARRIS is exempt
from estimating the fair value. However, ARRIS is required to estimate the fair value if there has
been an identifiable event or change in circumstance that may have a significant adverse effect on
the fair value of the investment.
Classification of available-for-sale securities as current or non-current is dependent upon
managements intended holding period, the securitys maturity date and liquidity consideration
based on market conditions. If management intends to hold the securities for longer than one year
as of the balance sheet date, they are classified as non-current.
Note 4. Fair Value Measurement
Fair value is based on the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In order
to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements, the FASB has established a
fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value
into three broad levels, which are described below:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement
date for assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level
1 inputs.
Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but
corroborated by market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The fair
value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.
The following table presents the Companys investment assets measured at fair value on a recurring
basis as of June 30, 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
Current investments |
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
216,254 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
231,254 |
|
Noncurrent investments |
|
|
7,705 |
|
|
|
22,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,237 |
|
Foreign currency contracts asset position |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
Foreign currency contracts liability
position |
|
|
1,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,530 |
|
All of the Companys short-term investments and long-term investments instruments are
classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy as they are valued using quoted
market prices, market prices for similar securities, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable
levels of price transparency. The types of instruments valued based on quoted market prices in
active markets include the Companys investment in money market funds, mutual funds, U.S.
government bonds and investments in public companies. Such instruments are generally classified
within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. The types of instruments valued based on other
observable inputs include the Companys cash surrender value of company owned life insurance,
corporate obligations and bonds, commercial paper and certificates of deposit. Such instruments
are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 3 and Note 5 for further
information on the Companys investments and derivative instruments.
All of the Companys foreign currency contracts are over-the-counter instruments. There is an
active market for these instruments, and therefore, they are classified as Level 1 in the fair
value hierarchy. ARRIS does not enter into currency contracts for trading purposes. The Company
has a master netting agreement with the primary
6
counterparty to the derivative instruments. This agreement allows for the net settlement of assets
and liabilities arising from different transactions with the same counterparty.
Note 5. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
ARRIS has certain international customers that are billed in their local currency. Changes in the
monetary exchange rates may affect the Companys results of operations and financial condition.
When deemed appropriate, ARRIS enters into various derivative transactions to enhance its ability
to manage the volatility relating to these foreign exchange exposures. The Company does not hold or
issue derivative instruments for trading or other speculative purposes. The Companys derivative
instruments are recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at their fair values. The Companys
derivative instruments are not designated as hedges, and, accordingly, all changes in the fair
value of the instruments are recognized as a loss (gain) on foreign currency in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations. The maximum time frame for ARRIS derivatives is currently less than 12
months. Derivative instruments that are subject to master netting arrangements are not offset in
the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The fair values of ARRIS derivative instruments recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2011 |
|
As of December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
Fair Value |
|
Location |
|
Fair Value |
Derivatives Not
Designated as
Hedging
Instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange
contracts asset
derivatives |
|
Other current assets |
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
Other current assets |
|
$ |
607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange
contracts
liability
derivatives |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
1,530 |
|
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
828 |
|
The change in the fair values of ARRIS derivative instruments recorded in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Statement of Operations |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
Location |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Derivatives Not
Designated as Hedging
Instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Loss (gain) on |
|
$ |
881 |
|
|
$ |
(1,384 |
) |
|
$ |
3,014 |
|
|
$ |
(1,993 |
) |
|
|
foreign currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6. Pension Benefits
Components of Net Periodic Pension Cost (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
$ |
136 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
1,071 |
|
|
|
1,057 |
|
Expected gain on plan assets |
|
|
(406 |
) |
|
|
(380 |
) |
|
|
(812 |
) |
|
|
(760 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 |
|
Amortization of net loss |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost |
|
$ |
279 |
|
|
$ |
352 |
|
|
$ |
559 |
|
|
$ |
703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
Employer Contributions
No minimum funding contributions are required in 2011 under the Companys defined benefit plan.
However, the Company made voluntary contributions to the plan of approximately $21 thousand and $42
thousand for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. Additionally, the Company
has established two rabbi trusts to fund the Companys pension obligations under the non-qualified
plan of the Chief Executive Officer and certain executive officers. The balance of these rabbi
trust assets as of June 30, 2011 was approximately $13.9 million and is included in Investments on
the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Note 7. Guarantees
Warranty
ARRIS provides warranties of various lengths to customers based on the specific product and the
terms of individual agreements. The Company provides for the estimated cost of product warranties
based on historical trends, the embedded base of product in the field, failure rates, and repair
costs at the time revenue is recognized. Expenses related to product defects and unusual product
warranty problems are recorded in the period that the problem is identified. While the Company
engages in extensive product quality programs and processes, including actively monitoring and
evaluating the quality of its suppliers, the estimated warranty obligation could be affected by
changes in ongoing product failure rates, material usage and service delivery costs incurred in
correcting a product failure, as well as specific product failures outside of ARRIS baseline
experience. If actual product failure rates, material usage or service delivery costs differ from
estimates, revisions (which could be material) would be recorded to the warranty liability.
The Company offers extended warranties and support service agreements on certain products. Revenue
from these agreements is deferred at the time of the sale and recognized on a straight-line basis
over the contract period. Costs of services performed under these types of contracts are charged
to expense as incurred, which approximates the timing of the revenue stream.
Information regarding the changes in ARRIS aggregate product warranty liabilities for the six
months ended June 30, 2011 was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
5,340 |
|
Accruals related to warranties (including changes in estimates) |
|
|
1,352 |
|
Settlements made (in cash or in kind) |
|
|
(1,015 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
5,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8. Restructuring Charges
ARRIS has restructuring accruals representing contractual obligations
that relate to excess leased facilities and equipment. Payments will
be made over their remaining lease terms through
2014, unless terminated earlier.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,517 |
|
Q1 2011 payments |
|
|
(93 |
) |
Q2 2011 payments |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
1,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 9. Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of average cost, approximating first-in, first-out, or market.
The components of inventory were as follows, net of reserves (in thousands):
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
20,841 |
|
|
$ |
19,053 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
3,437 |
|
|
|
4,176 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
88,742 |
|
|
|
78,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories, net |
|
$ |
113,020 |
|
|
$ |
101,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 10. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment, at cost, consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Land |
|
$ |
2,612 |
|
|
$ |
2,612 |
|
Building and leasehold improvements |
|
|
24,599 |
|
|
|
23,580 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
150,402 |
|
|
|
139,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,613 |
|
|
|
165,573 |
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(120,513 |
) |
|
|
(109,267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment, net |
|
$ |
57,100 |
|
|
$ |
56,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11. Convertible Senior Notes
In 2006, the Company issued $276.0 million of 2% convertible senior notes due 2026. The notes are
convertible, at the option of the holder, based on a conversion rate, subject to adjustment, of
62.1504 shares per $1,000 principal amount (which represents a conversion price of approximately
$16.09 per share of our common stock), into cash up to the principal amount and, if applicable,
shares of the Companys common stock, cash or a combination thereof for any excess. The notes may
be converted during any calendar quarter in which the closing price of ARRIS common stock for 20
or more trading days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of
the immediately preceding calendar quarter exceeds 120% of the conversion price in effect at that
time (which, based on the current conversion price, would be $19.31) and upon the occurrence of
certain other events. Upon conversion, the holder will receive the principal amount in cash and an
additional payment, in either cash or stock at the option of the Company. The additional payment
will be based on a formula which calculates the difference between the conversion rate ($16.09) and
the market price at the date of the conversion. As of August 5, 2011, the notes could not be
converted by the holders thereof. Interest is payable on May 15 and November 15 of each year. The
Company may redeem the notes at any time on or after November 15, 2013, subject to certain
conditions. In addition, the holders may require the Company to purchase all or a portion of their
convertible notes on or after November 13, 2013. There are no significant financial covenants
related to the notes.
During 2010, ARRIS acquired $24.0 million principal amount of the notes, which had a book value,
net of debt discount, of $20.0 million for approximately $23.3 million. The Company allocated $0.1
million to the reacquisition of the equity component of the notes. The Company also wrote off
approximately $0.2 million of deferred finance fees associated with the notes acquired. As a
result, the Company realized a gain of approximately $0.4 million on the retirement of the notes in
2010.
ARRIS accounts for the liability and equity components of the notes separately. The Company is
accreting the debt discount related to the equity component to non-cash interest expense over the
estimated seven year life of the convertible notes, which represents the first redemption date of
November 13, 2013 when the Company may redeem the notes at its election or the note holders may
require their redemption. The equity and liability components related to the notes were as follows
(in thousands):
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Carrying amount of the equity component |
|
$ |
48,527 |
|
|
$ |
48,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal amount of the liability component |
|
$ |
237,050 |
|
|
$ |
237,050 |
|
Unamortized discount |
|
|
(28,714 |
) |
|
|
(34,435 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount of the liability component |
|
$ |
208,336 |
|
|
$ |
202,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the contractual interest coupon and the amortization of the discount
on the equity component related to the notes during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011
and 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Contractual interest recognized |
|
$ |
1,185 |
|
|
$ |
1,296 |
|
|
$ |
2,371 |
|
|
$ |
2,601 |
|
Amortization of discount |
|
|
2,888 |
|
|
|
2,884 |
|
|
|
5,720 |
|
|
|
5,768 |
|
The effective annual interest rate on the debt component is 7.93%.
The Company paid approximately $7.8 million of finance fees related to the issuance of the notes.
Of the $7.8 million, approximately $5.3 million was attributed to the debt component and $2.5
million was attributed to the equity component of the convertible debt instrument. The portion
related to the debt component is being amortized over seven years. The remaining balance of
unamortized financing costs from these notes as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $1.6
million and $1.9 million, respectively.
The Company has not paid cash dividends on its common stock since its inception.
Note 12. Comprehensive Income
Total comprehensive income represents the net change in stockholders equity during a period from
sources other than transactions with stockholders. For ARRIS, the components of comprehensive
income include the unrealized gain on marketable securities. The components of
comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Net income |
|
$ |
16,690 |
|
|
$ |
19,774 |
|
|
$ |
28,254 |
|
|
$ |
38,765 |
|
Changes in the following equity accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on marketable
securities |
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
16,976 |
|
|
$ |
19,988 |
|
|
$ |
29,392 |
|
|
$ |
38,953 |
|
|
|
|
Note 13. Segment Information
The management approach has been used to present the following segment information. This approach
is based upon the way the management of the Company organizes segments within an enterprise for
making operating decisions and assessing performance. Financial information is reported on the
basis that it is used internally by the chief operating decision maker for evaluating segment
performance and deciding how to allocate resources to segments.
The Broadband Communications Systems segments product solutions include Headend and Subscriber
Premises equipment that enable cable operators to provide Voice over IP, Video over IP and
high-speed data services to residential and business subscribers.
10
The Access, Transport & Supplies segments product lines cover all components of a hybrid
fiber coax network, including managed and scalable headend and hub equipment, optical nodes, radio
frequency products, transport products and supplies.
The Media & Communications Systems segment provides content and operations management systems,
including products for Video on Demand, Ad Insertion, Digital Advertising, Service Assurance,
Service Fulfillment and Mobile Workforce Management.
The table below presents information about the Companys reporting segments for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BCS |
|
ATS |
|
MCS |
|
Total |
Three Months Ended June 30,
2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
201,844 |
|
|
$ |
46,870 |
|
|
$ |
17,085 |
|
|
$ |
265,799 |
|
Gross margin |
|
|
85,812 |
|
|
|
11,332 |
|
|
|
9,754 |
|
|
|
106,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
217,090 |
|
|
$ |
48,336 |
|
|
$ |
14,929 |
|
|
$ |
280,355 |
|
Gross margin |
|
|
92,805 |
|
|
|
13,149 |
|
|
|
7,324 |
|
|
|
113,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
408,474 |
|
|
$ |
92,492 |
|
|
$ |
32,269 |
|
|
$ |
533,235 |
|
Gross margin |
|
|
162,869 |
|
|
|
22,316 |
|
|
|
18,659 |
|
|
|
203,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
425,745 |
|
|
$ |
90,578 |
|
|
$ |
30,729 |
|
|
$ |
547,052 |
|
Gross margin |
|
|
187,479 |
|
|
|
22,851 |
|
|
|
15,459 |
|
|
|
225,789 |
|
The Companys gross intangible assets and goodwill by reportable segment as of June 30, 2011 has
not materially changed from December 31, 2010.
Note 14. Sales Information
The Companys two largest customers (including their affiliates, as applicable) are Comcast and
Time Warner Cable. Over the past year, certain customers beneficial ownership may have changed as
a result of mergers and acquisitions. Therefore the revenue for ARRIS customers for prior periods
has been adjusted to include the affiliates that are now under common control. A summary of sales
to these customers for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are set forth
below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Comcast and affiliates |
|
$ |
67,314 |
|
|
$ |
65,679 |
|
|
$ |
140,247 |
|
|
$ |
111,286 |
|
% of sales |
|
|
25.3 |
% |
|
|
23.4 |
% |
|
|
26.3 |
% |
|
|
20.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time Warner Cable and affiliates |
|
$ |
27,648 |
|
|
$ |
52,896 |
|
|
$ |
70,383 |
|
|
$ |
93,961 |
|
% of sales |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
18.9 |
% |
|
|
13.2 |
% |
|
|
17.2 |
% |
ARRIS sells its products primarily in the United States. The Companys international revenue is
generated in Asia Pacific, Europe, Latin America and Canada. The Asia Pacific market primarily
includes China, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan. The European market primarily
includes Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain,
Sweden, Switzerland, Great Britain, Ireland, Turkey, Russia, Romania, Hungry and Israel. The Latin
American market primarily includes Argentina, Brazil, Chile,
11
Columbia, Mexico, Peru, Puerto Rico,
Ecuador, Honduras, Costa Rica, Panama, Jamaica, and Bahamas. Sales to international customers were
approximately $84.3 million, or 31.7% of total sales, for the three months ended June 30, 2011.
International sales during the same period in 2010 were $92.6 million, or 33.0% of total sales. For
the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 sales to international customers were $161.9 million
and $201.4 million, or 30.4% and 36.8%, respectively.
Note 15. Earnings Per Share
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted
earnings per share (EPS) computations for the periods indicated (in thousands except per share
data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011(1) |
|
|
2010(1) |
|
|
2011(1) |
|
|
2010(1) |
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
16,690 |
|
|
$ |
19,774 |
|
|
$ |
28,254 |
|
|
$ |
38,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
121,800 |
|
|
|
126,584 |
|
|
|
122,047 |
|
|
|
126,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
16,690 |
|
|
$ |
19,774 |
|
|
$ |
28,254 |
|
|
$ |
38,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
121,800 |
|
|
|
126,584 |
|
|
|
122,047 |
|
|
|
126,277 |
|
Net effect of dilutive equity
awards |
|
|
1,911 |
|
|
|
3,133 |
|
|
|
2,673 |
|
|
|
3,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
123,711 |
|
|
|
129,717 |
|
|
|
124,720 |
|
|
|
129,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
EPS may not recalculate directly due to rounding. |
The Company has $237.1 million of convertible senior notes outstanding at June 30, 2011. Upon
conversion, ARRIS will satisfy at least the principal amount in cash, rather than common stock.
This reduced the potential earnings dilution to only include the conversion premium, which is the
difference between the conversion price per share of common stock and the average share price. The
average share price in 2011 and 2010 was less than the conversion price of $16.09 and,
consequently, did not result in dilution.
Excluded from the dilutive securities described above are employee stock options to acquire
approximately 5.5 million shares and 3.8 million shares for the three and six months ended June 30,
2011, respectively. During the same periods in 2010, approximately 4.4 million shares and 3.6
million shares, respectively, were excluded from the dilutive securities above. These exclusions
are made since the exercise price of these options is greater than the average market price of the
common stock for the period, or if the Company has net losses, both of which have an anti-dilutive
effect.
During the
six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company issued 3.4 million shares
of its common stock related to stock option exercises and the
vesting of restricted shares, as compared to 2.0 million shares for
the twelve months ended December 31, 2010.
Note 16. Income Taxes
In the first half of 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded income tax expense of $5.9 million and
$21.4 million, respectively. Below is a summary of the components of the tax expense for the three
and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands, except for percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30 |
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30 |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
Before |
|
Income Tax |
|
Effective Tax |
|
Before |
|
Income Tax |
|
Effective Tax |
|
Before |
|
Tax |
|
Effective |
|
Income Before |
|
Tax |
|
Effective |
|
|
Tax |
|
Expense |
|
Rate |
|
Tax |
|
Expense |
|
Rate |
|
Tax |
|
Expense |
|
Tax Rate |
|
Tax |
|
Expense |
|
Tax Rate |
Non-discrete Items |
|
$ |
22,837 |
|
|
$ |
6,147 |
|
|
|
26.9 |
% |
|
$ |
29,845 |
|
|
$ |
10,422 |
|
|
|
34.9 |
% |
|
$ |
34,162 |
|
|
$ |
9,490 |
|
|
|
27.7 |
% |
|
$ |
60,199 |
|
|
$ |
20,563 |
|
|
|
34.1 |
% |
Discrete tax events valuation
allowances,
uncertain tax
positions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,582 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
871 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
22,837 |
|
|
$ |
6,147 |
|
|
|
26.9 |
% |
|
$ |
29,845 |
|
|
$ |
10,071 |
|
|
|
33.7 |
% |
|
$ |
34,162 |
|
|
$ |
5,908 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
$ |
60,199 |
|
|
$ |
21,434 |
|
|
|
35.6 |
% |
12
|
|
|
During the first quarter of 2011, the Company identified $4.0 million of discrete
tax benefits relating to the release of valuation allowances against state deferred tax
assets, which was partially offset by $0.4 million of additional liabilities related to
uncertain tax positions attributable to AMT credits. |
|
|
|
During the first quarter of 2010, the Company identified $1.2 million of discrete tax
adjustments relating to state deferred tax assets. During the second quarter of 2010, the
Company recorded a $0.3 million discrete tax benefit attributable to Federal deferred tax
assets. |
Note 17. Repurchases of ARRIS Common Stock
The table below sets forth the purchases of ARRIS common stock for the quarter ended June 30, 2011
(in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Dollar Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as |
|
Shares That May |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Part of Publicly |
|
Yet Be Purchased |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Price Paid |
|
Announced Plans |
|
Under the Plans |
Period |
|
Shares Purchased |
|
Per Share(1) |
|
or Programs(1)(2) |
|
or Programs(1)(2) |
|
|
|
April 2011 |
|
|
1,533 |
|
|
$ |
12.43 |
|
|
|
1,533 |
|
|
$ |
11,617 |
|
May 2011 |
|
|
1,358 |
|
|
$ |
11.18 |
|
|
|
1,358 |
|
|
$ |
146,426 |
|
June 2011 |
|
|
2,178 |
|
|
$ |
10.75 |
|
|
|
2,178 |
|
|
$ |
123,027 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In March, 2009, the Companys Board of Directors had authorized a plan for ARRIS to
repurchase up to $100 million of our common stock. The Company did not repurchase any
shares under the plan during 2009. During the fiscal year 2010, ARRIS repurchased and
retired 6.8 million shares of its common stock at an average price of $10.24 per share for
an aggregate purchase price of $69.3 million. ARRIS did not purchase any shares under
the plan in the first quarter of 2011. In May 2011, the share repurchase authorization
amount under the 2009 plan was exhausted. |
|
(2) |
|
In May 2011, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a new plan for the Company to
purchase up to $150 million of the Companys common stock. During the second quarter of
2011, ARRIS repurchased approximately 5.1 million shares of the Companys common stock at
an average price of $11.37 per share for an aggregate consideration of approximately $57.6
million. Unless terminated earlier by a Board resolution, the Program will expire
when we have used all authorized funds for repurchase. The remaining authorized amount for
stock repurchases under this program was $123.0 million as of June 30, 2011. |
Note 18. Contingencies
From time to time, ARRIS is involved in claims, disputes, litigation or legal proceedings
incidental to the ordinary course of its business, such as intellectual property disputes,
contractual disputes, employment matters and environmental proceedings. It is not possible to
reasonably estimate the probability of an adverse outcome or the potential loss associated with any
such items. See Part II, Item 1, Legal Proceedings.
13
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Overview
We are a global communications technology company, headquartered in Suwanee, Georgia. We operate
in three business segments, Broadband Communications Systems (BCS), Access, Transport & Supplies
(ATS), and Media & Communications Systems (MCS). A detailed description of each segment is
contained in Our Principal Products in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. We
specialize in integrated broadband network solutions that include products, systems and software
for content and operations management (including video on demand, or VOD), and professional
services. We are a leading developer, manufacturer and supplier of telephony, data, video,
construction, rebuild and maintenance equipment for the broadband communications industry. In
addition, we are a leading supplier of infrastructure products used by cable system operators to
build-out and maintain hybrid fiber-coaxial (HFC) networks. We provide our customers with
products and services that enable reliable, high speed, two-way broadband transmission of video,
telephony, and data.
Our Strategy and Key Highlights
Our long-term business strategy, Convergence Enabled, includes the following key elements:
|
|
|
Maintain a strong capital structure, mindful of our debt (which is likely to be
required to be repaid in 2013), share repurchase opportunities and other capital needs
including mergers and acquisitions. |
|
|
|
|
Grow our current business into a more complete portfolio including a strong video
product suite. |
|
|
|
|
Continue to invest in the evolution toward enabling true network convergence onto an
all IP platform. |
|
|
|
|
Continue to expand our product/service portfolio through internal developments,
partnerships and acquisitions. |
|
|
|
|
Expand our international business and begin to consider opportunities in markets other
than cable. |
|
|
|
|
Continue to invest in and evolve the ARRIS talent pool to implement these strategies. |
To fulfill our strategy, we develop technology, facilitate its implementation, and enable operators
to put their subscribers in control of their entertainment, information, and communication needs.
Through a set of business solutions that respond to specific market needs, we are integrating our
products, software, and services solutions to work with our customers as they address Internet
Protocol telephony deployment, high speed data deployment, high definition television content
expansion, on demand video rollout, operations management, network integration, and business
services opportunities.
Below are some key highlights relative to our second quarter and first half of 2011:
Financial Highlights
|
|
|
Sales in the second quarter and first half of 2011 were $265.8 million and $533.2
million, respectively, down slightly from $280.4 million and $547.1 million in the same
periods in 2010 |
|
|
|
|
Gross margin percentage was 40.2% in the second quarter 2011, which compares to 40.4% in
the second quarter 2010 and 36.3% in the first quarter 2011. The sequential increase in
margin reflects the introduction of our CMTS line card capacity upgrade, which have higher
margins. |
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses (excluding amortization of intangible assets) in the second
quarter of 2011 were $72.5 million, up $2.5 million year over year. Research and
development expenses increased $1.1 million as a result of prototypes and incremental start
up costs related to new product development. Selling, general, and administrative expenses
increased $1.4 million as a result of higher variable compensation costs and higher legal
costs. We anticipate our operating expenses to modestly increase in the third quarter of
2011 as a result of higher prototype and start up costs related to new product
introductions and variable compensation costs. |
|
|
|
|
We ended the second quarter 2011 with $591.5 million of cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments. We generated approximately $31.4 million and $35.2 million of cash
from operating activities in the second quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively. During
the first half of 2011, we generated approximately $27.8 million of cash from operating
activities as compared to $83.4 million during the first half of 2010. |
|
|
|
|
In the first half of 2011, we repurchased 5.1 million shares of our common stock at an
average price of $11.37 per share for an aggregate consideration of approximately $57.6
million. |
14
Product Line Highlights
|
|
|
Broadband Communications Systems |
|
§ |
|
In second quarter 2011 we began to sell new software license that
enables operators to purchase incremental downstream capacity on existing
deployed line cards. |
|
|
§ |
|
Downstream port shipments in second quarter 2011 (including both new
hardware and software licenses) increased to 79 thousand ports.
Year-to-date downstream port shipments were 142 thousand ports. |
|
|
§ |
|
The introduction of the downstream software license capability enabled
lower pricing at improved gross margins, enhancing both competitiveness and
profitability. |
|
|
§ |
|
Good progress on development of new double-density upstream line card. |
|
|
§ |
|
Good progress on development of next generation Converged Edge Router
CMTS product that will enable smooth transition of legacy video networks to
IP |
|
§ |
|
Release of a new video processing platform supporting MPEG4 encoding,
transcoding, and adaptive streaming for IP-based video distribution |
|
§ |
|
Commercial launch of new Home Media Gateway solution with lead
customers, with first product revenue recognized in the second quarter of
2011. |
|
§ |
|
Approximately 1.3 million and 2.7 million CPE units were shipped in the
second quarter of 2011 and in the first six months of 2011, respectively.
Shipments of DOCSIS 3.0 CPE increased to 36% of the total unit shipments as
compared to 29% in the first quarter of 2011. |
|
|
§ |
|
Maintained number one EMTA market share for 26 consecutive quarters
(source: Infonetics) |
|
|
|
Access, Transport & Supplies |
|
o |
|
Increasing demand in the ATS business unit as a result of higher
Professional Services and Access product opportunities. |
|
|
o |
|
Professional Services growth related to activities in Cell Tower
Backhaul, Metro-E and Telco Solutions |
|
|
o |
|
MSOs increasing investments in node segmentation as a cost effective
vehicle to provide more capacity per subscriber |
|
§ |
|
Multi-wavelength optics continue to gain traction in support of these
MSO investments |
|
|
§ |
|
Investments by ARRIS to take advantage of technology improvements and
component cost reductions continue to position us well with the MSOs |
|
|
|
Media & Communications Systems |
|
o |
|
Continued wins in the Ad insertion segment in North America with key
trials of Linear Addressable Advertising underway with major MSOs |
|
|
o |
|
Storage upgrades to our XMS VOD server platform with key North American customers |
|
|
o |
|
Good wins for Assurance products in CALA. |
|
|
o |
|
Announcement of ServAssureTM 3.3 which includes support for IPV6. |
|
|
o |
|
New trials of FMC with major North American and international operators kicked off. |
Non-GAAP Measures
As part of our ongoing review of financial information related to our business, we regularly use
Non-GAAP measures, in particular Non-GAAP earnings per share, as we believe they provide a
meaningful insight into our business and trends. We also believe that these Non-GAAP measures
provide readers of our financial statements with useful information and insight with respect to the
results of our business. However, the presentation of Non-GAAP information is not intended to be
considered in isolation or as a substitute for results prepared in
15
accordance with GAAP. Below are tables for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 that
detail and reconcile GAAP and Non-GAAP earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
(Income) |
|
|
Income Tax |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Gross Margin |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Net Income |
|
GAAP |
|
$ |
106,898 |
|
|
$ |
81,441 |
|
|
$ |
25,457 |
|
|
$ |
2,620 |
|
|
$ |
6,147 |
|
|
$ |
16,690 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
(5,368 |
) |
|
|
5,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,925 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,944 |
) |
|
|
8,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,944 |
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,889 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,889 |
|
Tax related to items above |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,915 |
|
|
|
(4,915 |
) |
|
|
|
Non-GAAP |
|
$ |
107,455 |
|
|
$ |
67,129 |
|
|
$ |
40,326 |
|
|
$ |
(269 |
) |
|
$ |
11,062 |
|
|
$ |
29,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP net income per share diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP net income per share diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP weighted average common shares diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP weighted average common shares diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
(Income) |
|
|
Income Tax |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Gross Margin |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Net Income |
|
GAAP |
|
$ |
203,844 |
|
|
$ |
163,263 |
|
|
$ |
40,581 |
|
|
$ |
6,419 |
|
|
$ |
5,908 |
|
|
$ |
28,254 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
(10,215 |
) |
|
|
11,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,209 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,888 |
) |
|
|
17,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,888 |
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,721 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,721 |
|
Tax related to items above |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,939 |
|
|
|
(9,939 |
) |
Adjustments of income tax valuation allowances, R&D
credits, and other discrete tax items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,583 |
|
|
|
(3,583 |
) |
|
|
|
Non-GAAP |
|
$ |
204,838 |
|
|
$ |
135,160 |
|
|
$ |
69,678 |
|
|
$ |
698 |
|
|
$ |
19,430 |
|
|
$ |
49,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP net income per share diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP net income per share diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP weighted average common shares diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP weighted average common shares diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
(Income) |
|
|
Income Tax |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Gross Margin |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Net Income |
|
GAAP |
|
$ |
113,278 |
|
|
$ |
79,039 |
|
|
$ |
34,239 |
|
|
$ |
4,394 |
|
|
$ |
10,071 |
|
|
$ |
19,774 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
(5,272 |
) |
|
|
5,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,753 |
|
Acquisition costs, restructuring, and integration costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,022 |
) |
|
|
9,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,022 |
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,884 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,884 |
|
Gain on repurchase of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(115 |
) |
Tax related to items above |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,170 |
|
|
|
(6,170 |
) |
Adjustments of income tax valuation allowances, R&D
credits, and other discrete tax items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
(351 |
) |
|
|
|
Non-GAAP |
|
$ |
113,759 |
|
|
$ |
64,724 |
|
|
$ |
49,035 |
|
|
$ |
1,625 |
|
|
$ |
16,592 |
|
|
$ |
30,818 |
|
|
|
|
GAAP net income per share diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP net income per share diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP weighted average common shares diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP weighted average common shares diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
(Income) |
|
|
Income Tax |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Gross Margin |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Net Income |
|
GAAP |
|
$ |
225,789 |
|
|
$ |
157,595 |
|
|
$ |
68,194 |
|
|
$ |
7,995 |
|
|
$ |
21,434 |
|
|
$ |
38,765 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
(9,360 |
) |
|
|
10,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,274 |
|
Acquisition costs, restructuring, and integration costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,043 |
) |
|
|
18,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,043 |
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,767 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,767 |
|
Gain on repurchase of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(115 |
) |
Tax related to items above |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,675 |
|
|
|
(11,675 |
) |
Adjustments of income tax valuation allowances, R&D
credits, and other discrete tax items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(871 |
) |
|
|
871 |
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP |
|
$ |
226,703 |
|
|
$ |
130,119 |
|
|
$ |
96,584 |
|
|
$ |
2,343 |
|
|
$ |
32,238 |
|
|
$ |
62,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP net income per share diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP net income per share diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP weighted average common shares diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP weighted average common shares diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In managing and reviewing our business performance, we exclude a number of items required by
GAAP. Management believes that excluding these items is useful in understanding the trends and
managing our operations. We provide these supplemental non-GAAP measures in order to assist the
investment community to see ARRIS through the eyes of management, and therefore enhance
understanding of ARRIS operating performance. These adjustments consist of:
|
|
|
Stock compensation expense ARRIS records non-cash compensation expense related to
grants of options and restricted stock. Depending upon the size, timing and the terms of
the grants, this non-cash compensation expense may vary significantly. |
|
|
|
|
Acquisition costs, restructuring, and integration costs although these items or
similar items might recur, they are of a nature and magnitude that identifying them
separately provides investors with a greater ability to project ARRIS future performance. |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangibles non-cash amortization of the intangibles related to our
acquisitions. |
|
|
|
|
Non-cash interest expense ARRIS records non-cash interest expense related to the
convertible debt. Disclosing the non-cash component provides investors with the
information regarding interest that will not be paid out in cash.
|
17
|
|
|
Adjustments of income taxes valuation allowances, R&D credits, and other discrete tax
items During the first quarter of 2011, a net tax benefit of approximately $3.6 million
was recorded for state valuation allowances. During the first quarter of 2010, ARRIS
recorded a discrete tax expense of $1.2 million related to state deferred tax assets.
Included in the second quarter of 2010 was a net discrete tax benefit of $0.3 million
attributable to certain federal deferred tax assets. |
Significant Customers
The Companys two largest customers (including their affiliates, as applicable) are Comcast and
Time Warner Cable. Over the past year, certain customers beneficial ownership may have changed as
a result of mergers and acquisitions. Therefore the revenue for ARRIS customers for prior periods
has been adjusted to include the affiliates that are now under common control. A summary of sales
to these customers for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are set forth
below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Comcast and affiliates |
|
$ |
67,314 |
|
|
$ |
65,679 |
|
|
$ |
140,247 |
|
|
$ |
111,286 |
|
% of sales |
|
|
25.3 |
% |
|
|
23.4 |
% |
|
|
26.3 |
% |
|
|
20.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time Warner Cable and affiliates |
|
$ |
27,648 |
|
|
$ |
52,896 |
|
|
$ |
70,383 |
|
|
$ |
93,961 |
|
% of sales |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
18.9 |
% |
|
|
13.2 |
% |
|
|
17.2 |
% |
Comparison of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
Net Sales
The table below sets forth our net sales for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
for each of our segments (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) Between 2011 and 2010 |
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30 |
|
|
Ended June 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Business
Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BCS |
|
$ |
201,844 |
|
|
$ |
217,090 |
|
|
$ |
408,474 |
|
|
$ |
425,745 |
|
|
$ |
(15,246 |
) |
|
|
(7.0 |
)% |
|
$ |
(17,271 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
)% |
ATS |
|
|
46,870 |
|
|
|
48,336 |
|
|
|
92,492 |
|
|
|
90,578 |
|
|
|
(1,466 |
) |
|
|
(3.0 |
)% |
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
MCS |
|
|
17,085 |
|
|
|
14,929 |
|
|
|
32,269 |
|
|
|
30,729 |
|
|
|
2,156 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
% |
|
|
1,540 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales |
|
$ |
265,799 |
|
|
$ |
280,355 |
|
|
$ |
533,235 |
|
|
$ |
547,052 |
|
|
$ |
(14,556 |
) |
|
|
(5.2 |
)% |
|
$ |
(13,817 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below sets forth our domestic and international sales for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) Between 2011 and 2010 |
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30 |
|
|
Ended June 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
181,468 |
|
|
$ |
187,742 |
|
|
$ |
371,333 |
|
|
$ |
345,647 |
|
|
$ |
(6,274 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
)% |
|
$ |
25,686 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
% |
International |
|
|
84,331 |
|
|
|
92,613 |
|
|
|
161,902 |
|
|
|
201,405 |
|
|
|
(8,282 |
) |
|
|
(8.9 |
)% |
|
|
(39,503 |
) |
|
|
(19.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales |
|
$ |
265,799 |
|
|
$ |
280,355 |
|
|
$ |
533,235 |
|
|
$ |
547,052 |
|
|
$ |
(14,556 |
) |
|
|
(5.2 |
)% |
|
$ |
(13,817 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
Broadband Communication Systems Net Sales 2011 vs. 2010
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, sales of our Broadband Communications Systems
segment products decreased by approximately 7.0% and 4.1%, respectively, as compared to the same
periods in 2010. Although we continue to experience strong demand for our CMTS products, we have
reduced pricing on these products in order to remain competitive, resulting in lower revenue. In
the second quarter of 2011, we began selling our new CMTS higher density downstream line cards and
upgrade licenses, resulting in overall improvement in gross margin from the first quarter of 2011
to the second quarter of 2011.
Access, Transport & Supplies Net Sales 2011 vs. 2010
Sales in our Access, Transport and Supplies segment decreased by approximately 3.0% during the
three months ended June 30, 2011, but increased by approximately 2.1% during the six months ended
June 30, 2011 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. The change is immaterial.
Media & Communication Systems Net Sales 2011 vs. 2010
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, sales in our Media & Communications Systems
segment increased by approximately 14.4% and 5.0%, respectively, as compared to the same periods in
2010. Revenue in this segment varies as it is tied to customer acceptances and non linear orders.
Gross Margin
The table below sets forth our gross margin for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and
2010, for each of our reporting segments (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin $ |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) Between 2011 and 2010 |
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30 |
|
|
Ended June 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Business Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BCS |
|
$ |
85,812 |
|
|
$ |
92,805 |
|
|
$ |
162,869 |
|
|
$ |
187,479 |
|
|
$ |
(6,993 |
) |
|
|
(7.5 |
)% |
|
$ |
(24,610 |
) |
|
|
(13.1 |
)% |
ATS |
|
|
11,332 |
|
|
|
13,149 |
|
|
|
22,316 |
|
|
|
22,851 |
|
|
|
(1,817 |
) |
|
|
(13.8 |
)% |
|
|
(535 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
)% |
MCS |
|
|
9,754 |
|
|
|
7,324 |
|
|
|
18,659 |
|
|
|
15,459 |
|
|
|
2,430 |
|
|
|
33.2 |
% |
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
106,898 |
|
|
$ |
113,278 |
|
|
$ |
203,844 |
|
|
$ |
225,789 |
|
|
$ |
(6,380 |
) |
|
|
(5.6 |
)% |
|
$ |
(21,945 |
) |
|
|
(9.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below sets forth our gross margin percentages for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, for each of our business segments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin % |
|
Increase (Decrease) Between 2011 and 2010 |
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Six Months |
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30 |
|
Ended June 30 |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Percentage Points |
Business Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BCS |
|
|
42.5 |
% |
|
|
42.7 |
% |
|
|
39.9 |
% |
|
|
44.0 |
% |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
ATS |
|
|
24.2 |
% |
|
|
27.2 |
% |
|
|
24.1 |
% |
|
|
25.2 |
% |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
MCS |
|
|
57.1 |
% |
|
|
49.1 |
% |
|
|
57.8 |
% |
|
|
50.3 |
% |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
Total |
|
|
40.2 |
% |
|
|
40.4 |
% |
|
|
38.2 |
% |
|
|
41.3 |
% |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
Broadband Communications Systems Gross Margin 2011 vs. 2010
Broadband Communications Systems segment gross margin percentage decreased during the three and six
months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the same periods in 2010. The gross margin in the first
quarter of 2011 was 37.3% as compared to 45.4% in the first quarter of 2010. The decrease was the
result of pricing reduction and product mix. In the second quarter of 2011, gross margin increased
to 42.5% as compared to 37.3% in the first
19
quarter of
2011. The increase was the result of the introduction of CMTS downstream capacity software licenses which have higher margins.
Access, Transport & Supplies Gross Margin 2011 vs. 2010
The Access, Transport & Supplies segment gross margin dollars and percentage decreased for the
three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the same periods in 2010.
Contributing to the decreases were the lower volume in the quarter, as well as product mix and
pricing pressure associated with Supplies which were partially offset by improved margins
associated with professional services during the first half of 2011.
Media & Communications Systems Gross Margin 2011 vs. 2010
Media & Communications Systems segment gross margin dollars and percentage increased year over
year. The increase reflects higher Assurance product sales which have higher gross margins.
Operating Expenses
The table below provides detail regarding our operating expenses (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) Between 2011 and 2010 |
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30 |
|
|
Ended June 30 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
SG&A |
|
$ |
35,868 |
|
|
$ |
34,458 |
|
|
$ |
72,706 |
|
|
$ |
69,576 |
|
|
$ |
1,410 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
$ |
3,130 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
Research & development |
|
|
36,629 |
|
|
|
35,538 |
|
|
|
72,669 |
|
|
|
69,903 |
|
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
2,766 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
)% |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
)% |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
8,944 |
|
|
|
9,022 |
|
|
|
17,888 |
|
|
|
18,043 |
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
)% |
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
81,441 |
|
|
$ |
79,039 |
|
|
$ |
163,263 |
|
|
$ |
157,595 |
|
|
$ |
2,402 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
$ |
5,668 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, General, and Administrative, or SG&A, Expenses
The year over year increase in SG&A expense reflects higher variable compensation costs and higher legal costs.
Research & Development Expenses
The year over year increase in R&D expenses reflects incremental start up costs related to new
product and increased headcount, as we continued to aggressively invest in R&D.
Restructuring Charges
On a quarterly basis, we review our existing restructuring accruals and make adjustments if
necessary. For the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2011, we did not have any
restructuring charges. For the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2010, restructuring
charges were $21 thousand and $73 thousand, respectively.
Amortization of Intangibles
Intangibles amortization expense for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $8.9 million
and $9.0 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, intangible
amortization expense was $17.9 million and $18.0 million, respectively. Our intangible expense is
related to the acquisitions of Digeo, Inc. in October 2009, EG Technologies in September 2009,
Auspice Corporation in August 2008 and C-COR Inc. in December 2007.
Goodwill Impairment
Goodwill relates to the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets resulting from an
acquisition. Our goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if events
or changes in circumstances indicate that
20
the asset is more likely than not impaired. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and
2010, no indicators of impairment existed and, therefore, no impairment charges were recorded.
Based on our most recent annual goodwill impairment assessment performed as of October 1, 2010, we
determined that our BCS, ATS, and MCS reporting units were not at risk of failing step one of the
goodwill impairment test. However, our MCS reporting unit valuation included assumptions and
estimates of cash flows, including probability weighted cash flows conditional upon favorable
outcome of litigation we are currently pursuing against another company (see Part II, Item 1,
Legal Proceedings). Excluding the discrete contingent cash flows, our MCS reporting unit was at
risk of failing step one of the goodwill impairment test, and is therefore at risk of a future
impairment in the event of significant unfavorable changes in the forecasted cash flows or the key
assumptions used in our analysis, including the weighted average cost of capital (discount rate)
and growth rates utilized in the discounted cash flow analysis. Further, upon a favorable
settlement and recovery or an unfavorable outcome with no settlement proceeds, no future value
would exist related to such contingent cash flows, and as a result the MCS reporting unit may be at
risk of failing step one of the impairment test. As of June 30, 2011, the litigation had yet to be
resolved.
The following table sets forth the information regarding our MCS reporting unit as of October 1,
2010 (annual goodwill impairment testing date), including key assumptions (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Fair Value Exceeds Carrying Value as of |
|
Goodwill as of |
|
|
Key Assumptions |
|
October 1, 2010 |
|
October 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Discount |
|
Growth |
|
Inclusive of contingent |
|
Excluding contingent |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Rate |
|
Rate |
|
cash flows |
|
cash flows |
|
Amount |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MCS |
|
|
16.0 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
27.1 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
$ |
41,875 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
% |
Assumptions and estimates about future cash flows and discount rates are complex and often
subjective. They are sensitive to changes in underlying assumptions and can be affected by a
variety of factors, including external factors such as industry and economic trends, and internal
factors such as changes in our business strategy and our internal forecasts. Our assessment
includes significant estimates and assumptions including the timing and amount of future discounted
cash flows, the discount rate and the perpetual growth rate used to calculate the terminal value.
Our discounted cash flow analysis included projected cash flows over a ten-year period, using our
three-year business plans plus an additional seven years of projected cash flows based on the most
recent three-year plan. These forecasted cash flows took into consideration managements outlook
for the future and were compared to historical performance to assess reasonableness. A discount
rate was applied to the forecasted cash flows. The discount rate considered market and industry
data, as well as the specific risk profile of the reporting unit. A terminal value was calculated,
which estimates the value of annual cash flow to be received after the discrete forecast periods.
The terminal value was based upon an exit value of annual cash flow after the discrete forecast
period in year ten.
Examples of events or circumstances that could reasonably be expected to negatively affect the
underlying key assumptions and ultimately impact the estimated fair value of the reporting unit may
include such items as the following:
|
|
|
a prolonged decline in capital spending for constructing, rebuilding,
maintaining, or upgrading broadband communications systems; |
|
|
|
|
rapid changes in technology occurring in the broadband communication markets
which could lead to the entry of new competitors or increased competition from
existing competitors that would adversely affect our sales and profitability; |
|
|
|
|
the concentration of business we receive from several key customers, the
loss of which would have a material adverse effect on our business; |
|
|
|
|
continued consolidation of our customers base in the telecommunications
industry could result in delays or reductions in purchases of our products and
services, if the acquirer decided not to continue using us as a supplier; |
21
|
|
|
new products and markets currently under development may fail to realize
anticipated benefits; |
|
|
|
|
changes in business strategies affecting future investments in businesses,
products and technologies to complement or expand our business could result in
adverse impacts to existing business and products; |
|
|
|
|
volatility in the capital (equity and debt) markets, resulting in a higher
discount rate; and |
|
|
|
|
legal proceeding settlements and/or recoveries, and its affect on future
cash flows. |
As a result, there can be no assurance that the estimates and assumptions made for purposes of the
annual goodwill impairment test will prove to be accurate predictions of the future. Although
management believes the assumptions and estimates made are reasonable and appropriate, different
assumptions and estimates could materially impact the reported financial results. The table below
provides sensitivity analysis related to the impact of each of the key assumptions, on a standalone
basis, on the resulting percentage change in fair value of our MCS reporting unit as of October 1,
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Reduction in Fair Value (excluding contingent cash flows) |
|
|
Assuming Hypothetical |
|
Assuming Hypothetical |
|
Assuming Hypothetical |
|
|
10% Reduction in cash |
|
1% increase in Discount |
|
1% decrease in Terminal |
|
|
flows |
|
Rate |
|
Growth Rate |
|
|
|
MCS |
|
|
-6.0 |
% |
|
|
-6.2 |
% |
|
|
-2.2 |
% |
Other Expense (Income)
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $4.2 million and $4.8
million respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, interest expense was $8.4
million and $9.2 million respectively. Interest expense reflects the amortization of deferred
finance fees and the non-cash interest component of our convertible subordinated notes, interest
paid on the notes, capital leases and other debt obligations.
Interest Income
Interest income during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $0.9 million and $0.7
million, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, interest income was $1.7
million and $1.1 million, respectively. The income reflects interest earned on cash, cash
equivalents and short-term investments.
Loss in Foreign Currency
During the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded a foreign currency loss of
approximately $0.1 million and $1.0 million, respectively. During the three months and six months
ended June 30, 2010, we recorded a foreign currency loss of approximately $0.5 million and $0.2
million, respectively. We have certain international customers who are billed in their local
currency, primarily the euro. To mitigate the volatility related to fluctuations in the foreign
exchange rates, we may enter into various foreign currency contracts. The loss (gain) on foreign
currency is driven by the fluctuations in the foreign currency exchanges rates, primarily the euro.
Other Expense (Income)
Other income for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $0.4 million and $0.1 million,
respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, other income was $0.5 million and
$0.2 million, respectively.
Income Taxes
In the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded income tax expense of $6.1 million and
$5.9 million, respectively, as compared to $10.1 million and $21.4 million, respectively in the
same periods in 2010. In the first quarter of 2011, the Company implemented certain legal entity
changes to reduce complexity and simplify our corporate organizational structure and tax accounting
provision process. As a result, approximately
22
$3.6 million of valuation allowances related to
state deferred tax assets, generated primarily from net operating losses, were reversed as we
concluded it was more likely than not that we will now be able to utilize the deferred tax assets
in future periods. In the first half of 2010, adjustments to certain Federal and State deferred
tax assets, mostly attributable to state net operating losses, resulted in a net discrete tax
expense of $0.9 million.
The Company anticipates that the effective income tax rate for full year 2011, excluding discrete
items, will be slightly below 30%.
Financial Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
One of our key strategies is to maintain and improve our capital structure. The key metrics we
focus on are summarized in the table below:
Liquidity & Capital Resources Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
(in thousands, except DSO and turns) |
Key Working Capital Items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
27,809 |
|
|
$ |
83,407 |
|
Cash, cash equivalents, and
short-term investments |
|
$ |
591,535 |
|
|
$ |
663,353 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
152,436 |
|
|
$ |
139,673 |
|
Days Sales Outstanding (DSOs) |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Inventory |
|
$ |
113,020 |
|
|
$ |
78,830 |
|
Inventory turns |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible notes at face value |
|
$ |
237,050 |
|
|
$ |
256,050 |
|
Convertible notes at book value |
|
$ |
208,336 |
|
|
$ |
212,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures |
|
$ |
12,547 |
|
|
$ |
10,265 |
|
In managing our liquidity and capital structure, we have been and are focused on key goals, and we
have and will continue in the future to implement actions to achieve them. They include:
|
|
|
Liquidity ensure that we have sufficient cash resources or other short
term liquidity to manage day to day operations |
|
|
|
|
Growth implement a plan to ensure that we have adequate capital
resources, or access thereto, to fund internal growth and to execute acquisitions while
retiring our convertible notes in a timely fashion. |
|
|
|
|
Share repurchases opportunistically repurchase our common stock. |
Accounts Receivable & Inventory
We use the number of times per year that inventory turns over (based upon sales for the most recent
period, or turns) to evaluate inventory management, and days sales outstanding, or DSOs, to
evaluate accounts receivable management.
Accounts receivable increased and DSOs remained relatively flat during the first six months of 2011
as compared to 2010 as a result of payment patterns of our customers. Looking forward, it is possible
that our DSOs may increase dependent upon our customer mix and payment patterns, particularly if
international sales increase.
Inventory at the end of the second quarter 2011 was $34.2 million higher than the end of the second
quarter in 2010. Inventory turns in the first six months of 2011 were 6.1 as compared to 7.4 in
the same period of 2010.
23
The increase in inventory was primarily related to an increase in BCS
inventory levels to ensure adequate supply and as a result of the introduction of our Media
Gateway.
Summary of Current Liquidity Position and Potential for Future Capital Raising
We believe our current liquidity position, where we have approximately $591.5 million of cash, cash
equivalents, and short-term investments on hand as of June 30, 2011, together with the prospects
for continued generation of cash from operations are adequate for our short- and medium-term
business needs. We may in the future elect to repurchase additional shares of our common stock or
convertible notes. In addition, a key part of our overall long-term strategy may be implemented
through additional acquisitions, and a portion of these funds may be used for that purpose. Should
our available funds be insufficient for those purposes, it is possible that we will raise capital
through private, or public, share or debt offerings.
During the first quarter of 2009, ARRIS Board of Directors authorized a plan for the Company to
repurchase up to $100 million of the Companys common stock. The Company did not repurchase any
shares under the plan during 2009. In 2010, ARRIS repurchased 6.8 million shares of the Companys
common stock at an average price of $10.24 per share for an aggregate consideration of
approximately $69.3 million.
In May 2011, the share repurchase authorization amount under the 2009 plan was exhausted. In the
second quarter of 2011, the Board authorized a new plan for the Company to purchase up to $150
million of the Companys common stock. During the quarter, ARRIS repurchased approximately 5.1
million shares of the Companys common stock at an average price of $11.37 per share for an
aggregate consideration of approximately $57.6 million.
As of June 30, 2011, the remaining authorized amount for future repurchases was $123.0
million.
Commitments
Our contractual obligations are disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010. There has been no material change to our contractual obligations during the
first six months of 2011.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements.
Cash Flow
Below is a table setting forth the key line items of our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
27,809 |
|
|
$ |
83,407 |
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
24,086 |
|
|
|
(185,954 |
) |
Cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(44,735 |
) |
|
|
(27,086 |
) |
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash |
|
$ |
7,160 |
|
|
$ |
(129,633 |
) |
|
|
|
Operating Activities:
Below are the key line items affecting cash provided by operating activities (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
28,254 |
|
|
$ |
38,765 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash
provided by operating activities |
|
|
31,438 |
|
|
|
40,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income including adjustments |
|
|
59,692 |
|
|
|
79,451 |
|
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable |
|
|
(26,503 |
) |
|
|
3,743 |
|
(Increase) decrease in inventory |
|
|
(11,257 |
) |
|
|
17,021 |
|
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued
liabilities |
|
|
(15,480 |
) |
|
|
(19,623 |
) |
All other net |
|
|
21,357 |
|
|
|
2,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
27,809 |
|
|
$ |
83,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
Net Income Including Adjustments
Net income, including adjustments, decreased $19.8 million during the first six months of 2011 as
compared to 2010. Our net income before adjustments to net income decreased approximately $10.5
million in the first six months of 2011 as compared to 2010, primarily reflecting lower sales and
gross margin year over year. The adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating
activities in total remained relatively the same year over year but had one primary difference
within the total. Net deferred tax assets increased by $11.4 million during the first six months
of 2011 as compared to a net increase in the net deferred tax assets of $2.3 million during the
first six months of 2010.
Change in Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable increased by $26.5 million in the first six months of 2011. This increase was
primarily related to our billing pattern during the quarter, in which higher billing occurred
toward the end of the period. Account receivable decreased by $3.7 million in the first six months
of 2010.
Change in Inventory
Inventory increased by $11.3 million in the first six months of 2011. The increase was due
primarily to an effort to ensure supply of our BCS product offerings. Inventory decreased by $17.0
million in the first six months of 2010. The decrease was due primarily to timing of purchases and
an effort to reduce our inventory levels.
Change in Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
Declines in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in both years reflect the payment of annual
bonuses in the first quarter coupled with normal timing variations associated with payment of
accounts payable.
All Other Net
All other net includes the changes in other receivables, income taxes payable (recoverable), and
prepaids and other, net. The other receivables represent amounts due from our contract
manufacturers for material used in the assembly of our finished goods. The change in our income
taxes recoverable account is a result of the timing of the actual estimated tax payments during the
year as compared to the actual tax liability for the year.
Investing Activities:
Below are the key line items affecting investing activities (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(12,547 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,265 |
) |
Cash proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
|
(142,841 |
) |
|
|
(231,086 |
) |
Sales of short-term investments |
|
|
179,431 |
|
|
|
55,154 |
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
$ |
24,086 |
|
|
$ |
(185,954 |
) |
|
|
|
25
Capital Expenditures Capital expenditures are mainly for test equipment, manufacturing
equipment, leasehold improvements, computer equipment, and business application software. We
anticipate investing approximately $25 million in fiscal year 2011.
Cash Proceeds from Sale of Property, Plant and Equipment This represents the cash proceeds we
received from the sale of property, plant and equipment.
Purchases and Sales of Short-Term Investments These represent purchases and disposals of
short-term securities.
Financing Activities:
Below are the key line items affecting our financing activities (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Payment of debt obligations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(74 |
) |
Early redemption of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,800 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(57,647 |
) |
|
|
(23,685 |
) |
Excess income tax benefits from stock-based compensation plans |
|
|
3,247 |
|
|
|
2,647 |
|
Repurchase of shares to satisfy employee tax withholdings |
|
|
(8,245 |
) |
|
|
(6,425 |
) |
Fees and proceeds from issuance of common stock, net |
|
|
17,910 |
|
|
|
5,251 |
|
|
|
|
Cash used in financing activities |
|
$ |
(44,735 |
) |
|
$ |
(27,086 |
) |
|
|
|
Payment of Debt Obligation This represents the payment of the short term loan to the Pennsylvania
Industrial Development Authority (PIDA) for the cost of expansion of the facility in State College,
Pennsylvania. The debt was repaid in 2010.
Early Redemption of Long-Term Debt During the second quarter of 2010, we purchased $5.0 million
of face value of the convertible debt for approximately $4.8 million. The Company also wrote off
approximately $49 thousand of deferred finance fees associated with the portion of the notes
acquired. As a result, the Company realized a gain of approximately $115 thousand on the
retirement of the notes.
Repurchase of Common Stock During the first quarter of 2009, ARRIS Board of Directors
authorized a plan for the Company to repurchase up to $100 million of the Companys common stock.
The Company did not repurchase any shares under the plan during 2009. During the first six months
of 2010, ARRIS repurchased 2.2 million shares of the Companys common stock at an average price of
$10.99 per share for an aggregate consideration of approximately $23.7 million.
ARRIS did not purchase any shares in the first quarter of 2011. In May 2011, the share repurchase
authorization amount under the 2009 plan was exhausted. In the second quarter of 2011, the Board
authorized a new plan for the Company to purchase up to $150 million of the Companys common stock.
During the second quarter of 2011, ARRIS repurchased approximately 5.1 million shares of the
Companys common stock at an average price of $11.37 per share for an aggregate consideration of
approximately $57.6 million.
As of June 30, 2011, the remaining authorized amount for future repurchases was $123.0
million.
Excess Income Tax Benefits from Stock-Based Compensation Plans This represents the cash that
otherwise would have been paid for income taxes if increases in the value of equity instruments
also had not been deductible in determining taxable income.
Repurchase of Shares to Satisfy Employee Tax Withholdings -This represents the minimum shares
withheld to satisfy the tax withholding when restricted stock vests.
Fees and Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock, Net Represents cash proceeds related to the
exercise of stock options, offset by expenses paid related to issuance of common stock.
26
Interest Rates
As of June 30, 2011, we did not have any floating rate indebtedness or outstanding interest rate
swap agreements.
Foreign Currency
A significant portion of our products are manufactured or assembled in Mexico, Taiwan, China,
Ireland, and other foreign countries. Our sales into international markets have been and are
expected in the future to be an important part of our business. These foreign operations are
subject to the usual risks inherent in conducting business abroad, including risks with respect to
currency exchange rates, economic and political destabilization, restrictive actions and taxation
by foreign governments, nationalization, the laws and policies of the United States affecting
trade, foreign investment and loans, and foreign tax laws.
We have certain international customers who are billed in their local currency. We use a hedging
strategy and enter into forward or currency option contracts based on a percentage of expected
foreign currency revenues. The percentage can vary, based on the predictability of the revenues
denominated in foreign currency.
Financial Instruments
In the ordinary course of business, we, from time to time, will enter into financing arrangements
with customers. These financial arrangements include letters of credit, commitments to extend
credit and guarantees of debt. These agreements could include the granting of extended payment
terms that result in longer collection periods for accounts receivable and slower cash inflows from
operations and/or could result in the deferral of revenue.
ARRIS executes letters of credit in favor of certain landlords and vendors to guarantee performance
on lease and insurance contracts. Additionally, we have cash collateral account agreements with
our financial institutions as security against potential losses with respect to our foreign
currency hedging activities. The letters of credit and cash collateral accounts are reported as
restricted cash. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had approximately $3.6 million and
$4.9 million outstanding, respectively, of cash collateral.
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Short-Term Investments
Our cash and cash equivalents (which are highly-liquid investments with an original maturity of
three months or less) are primarily held in money market funds that pay either taxable or
non-taxable interest. We hold short-term investments consisting of debt securities classified as
available-for-sale, which are stated at estimated fair value. These debt securities consist
primarily of commercial paper, certificates of deposits, and U.S. government agency financial
instruments.
From time to time, we held certain investments in the common stock of publicly-traded companies,
which were classified as available-for-sale. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 our
holdings in these investments were $7.3 million and $5.8 million, respectively. Changes in the
market value of these securities are recorded in other comprehensive income and gains or losses on
related sales of these securities are recognized in income (loss).
ARRIS holds an investment in a private company. This investment is recorded using the cost method,
which was $4.0 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Due to the fact the investment
is in a private company, we are exempt from estimating the fair value on an interim basis.
However, ARRIS is required to estimate the fair value if there has been an identifiable event or
change in circumstance that may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the
investment. Each quarter, we evaluate our investment for any other-than-temporary impairment, by
reviewing the current revenues, bookings and long-term plan of the private company.
We have a deferred compensation plan that was available to certain current and former officers and
key executives of C-COR. During 2008, this plan was merged into a new non-qualified deferred
compensation plan which is also available to our key executives. Employee compensation deferrals
and matching contributions are held in a rabbi trust, which is a funding vehicle used to protect
the deferred compensation from various events (but not from bankruptcy or insolvency).
Additionally, we previously offered a deferred compensation arrangement to certain senior
employees. As of December 31, 2004, the plan was frozen and no further contributions are allowed.
The deferred earnings are invested in a rabbi trust.
27
We also have a deferred retirement salary plans, which were limited to certain current or former
officers of C-COR. We hold investments to cover the liability.
ARRIS also funds its nonqualified defined benefit plan for certain executives in a rabbi trust.
Capital Expenditures
Capital expenditures are made at a level designed to support the strategic and operating needs of
the business. ARRIS capital expenditures were $12.5 million in the first six months of 2011 as
compared to $10.3 million in the first six months of 2010. Management expects to invest
approximately $25 million in capital expenditures for the fiscal year 2011.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The accounting and financial reporting policies of ARRIS are in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles, which requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Management has discussed the development and selection of
the Companys critical accounting estimates with the audit committee of the Companys Board of
Directors and the audit committee has reviewed the Companys related disclosures.
Our critical accounting policies and estimates are disclosed in our Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010, as filed with the SEC. Our critical accounting estimates have not changed in
any material respect during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain information and statements contained in this Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other sections of this report, including
statements using terms such as may, expect, anticipate, intend, estimate, believe,
plan, continue, could be, or similar variations or the negative thereof, constitute
forward-looking statements with respect to the financial condition, results of operations, and
business of ARRIS, including statements that are based on current expectations, estimates,
forecasts, and projections about the markets in which we operate and managements beliefs and
assumptions regarding these markets. These and any other statements in this document that are not
statements about historical facts are forward-looking statements. We caution investors that
forward-looking statements made by us are not guarantees of future performance and that a variety
of factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or
other expectations expressed in our forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause
results or events to differ from current expectations are described in the risk factors set forth
in Item 1A, Risk Factors. These factors are not intended to be an all-encompassing list of risks
and uncertainties that may affect the operations, performance, development and results of our
business. In providing forward-looking statements, ARRIS expressly disclaims any obligation to
update publicly or otherwise these statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise except to the extent required by law.
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures
(as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the
end of the period covered by this report (the Evaluation Date). Based on that evaluation, such
officers concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as contemplated by the Act.
(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer evaluated the changes in our internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter. Based on that evaluation, our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that there had been no change in our
internal control over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
28
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, ARRIS is involved in claims, disputes, litigation or legal proceedings
incidental to the ordinary course of its business, such as intellectual property disputes,
contractual disputes, employment matters and environmental proceedings. Also, suits may be brought
against ARRIS customers that, in turn, may ask ARRIS for indemnification. Except as described
below, ARRIS is not party to any proceedings that are, or reasonably could be expected to be,
material to its business, results of operations or financial condition.
Pragmatus VOD LLC v. MSOs. Case 1:11-cv-00070-UNA, District of Delaware. In January 2011, Pragmatus
filed suit against most MSOs alleging infringement of two US patents, nos. 5,581,479 and 5,636,139,
related to VOD products and services. The complaint has been served on several of our customers,
and certain of the defendants have requested that we provide indemnification. We are in the process
of reviewing the patents. The complaint requests unspecified damages, although to-date no evidence
of damages has been introduced. It is premature to assess the likelihood of a favorable outcome. In
the event of an unfavorable outcome, ARRIS may be required to indemnify the MSOs, pay royalties
and/or cease utilizing certain technology.
Ceres Comm. v. MSOs, Telcos, and others. Case 1:99-mc-09999, District of Delaware. In August and
December 2010, Ceres filed suit against 23 and 13 companies, respectively, which included the major
MSOs, Telcos and others, alleging infringement of two US patents, nos. 5,774,526 and 7,149,252.
Certain of our customers that are defendants have requested that we provide indemnification. The
complaint requests unspecified damages, although to-date no evidence of damages has been
introduced. The parties held a scheduling conference in April 2011, and Skype Inc. recently moved
to disqualify the plaintiffs attorney. It is premature to assess the likelihood of a favorable
outcome. In the event of an unfavorable outcome, ARRIS may be required to indemnify the MSOs, pay
royalties and/or cease utilizing certain technology.
PACid v. BestBuy et al. Civil Action No. 10-cv-00370, Eastern District of Texas. In July 2010,
PACid filed suit against 87 companies, including ARRIS, alleging infringement of two US patents,
nos. 5963646 and 6049612, related to methods of encryption. ARRIS has been dismissed from this case
on 24th of May, 2011.
ARRIS v. British Telecom & British Telecom v. Cox and Cable One. 1:09-CV-0671, U.S. District Court,
Northern District of Georgia; C.A. No. 10-658 (SLR), U.S. District Court, District of Delaware;
1:11-CV-01231, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia. In March 2009, ARRIS filed a
complaint for Declaratory Judgment against British Telecom (BT) seeking to invalidate four BT
patents, nos. 5,142,532, 5,526,350, 6,538,989 and 6,665,264, and seeking a declaration that neither
ARRIS products, nor their use by ARRIS customers, infringe the four BT patents related to various
network features. This suit was in response to the assertion by BT (via its agent, IPValue), that
ARRIS products and/or their use by ARRIS customers infringed the four BT patents. On appeal of a
ruling regarding standing, ARRIS prevailed at the Federal Circuit, resulting in the Georgia case
moving forward. In August 2010, BT sued Cox and Cable One in Delaware alleging infringement of the
four BT patents. Cox and Cable One have requested ARRIS (and other suppliers) to provide
indemnification. The BT complaint requests unspecified damages. On June 10, 2011, Cox and CableOne
sought a stay of the Delaware case pending the outcome of the Georgia case. In April, 2011, ARRIS
filed a second complaint in the Northern District of Georgia for Declaratory Judgment against BT
seeking a finding of non-infringement or invalidity on four additional BT patents, nos. 5,790,643,
5,923,247, 6,205,216 and 6,473,742. It is premature to assess the likelihood of a favorable
outcome. In the event of an unfavorable outcome, ARRIS may be required to indemnify Cable One and
Cox, pay royalties and/or cease utilizing certain technology.
ARRIS v. SeaChange Int. (previously nCube v. SeaChange). CA No. 01-011 (JJF). U.S. District Court,
District of Delaware. In July 2009, ARRIS filed a motion for contempt against SeaChange
International seeking sanctions and the enforcement of the permanent injunction previously entered
by the Court with respect to certain infringing SeaChange Video-on-Demand products. The original
finding of infringement was affirmed by the Federal Circuit in 2006, and the asserted patent claims
(with one exception) were affirmed as patentable by the U.S. Patent Office in a re-examination
process initiated by SeaChange. In response to ARRIS motion, in August 2009, SeaChange filed suit
seeking a declaratory judgment that its products are non-infringing with respect to the patent. To
date, ARRIS has introduced evidence of infringement and sanctions based on SeaChanges sales of
accused products since 2002, and ARRIS has requested that enhanced sanctions be awarded if the
Court determines that the infringement is willful. (In 2002, the Court held that the infringement
in the original jury trial was willful and
29
doubled the jurys damages award). The declaratory judgment action has been stayed and a hearing on
the appropriateness of a contempt proceeding was held in March 2011. The parties have completed
discovery as well as pre-hearing and post-hearing briefing and are awaiting action by the Court.
Multiservice Solutions v. MSOs Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-00114, Eastern District of Texas. In March
2011, Multiservice Solutions filed suit against 4 service operators alleging infringement of one US
patent by all parties to the suit, no. 5,774,527, and another US patent by one party to the suit,
no. 5,774,527. Certain of our customers have requested that we provide indemnification. The
complaint requests unspecified damages for past and future infringement. To date, no evidence of
damages has been introduced. It is premature to assess the likelihood of a favorable outcome.
Olympic Developments AG v. MSOs Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-00612, Central District of California. In
January 2011, Olympic Developments AG filed suit against 9 cable and satellite service operators
alleging infringement of two US patents, nos. 5,475,585 and 6,246,400. Certain of our customers
have requested that we provide indemnification. The Court is currently awaiting an answer to be
filed by Comcast, and will thereafter set a scheduling conference. The complaint requests
unspecified damages for past infringement and an injunction against future infringement. To date,
no evidence of damages has been introduced. It is premature to assess the likelihood of a favorable
outcome.
From time to time third parties demand that we or our customers enter into a license agreement with
respect to patents owned, or allegedly owned, by the third parties. Such demands cause us to
dedicate time to study the patents and enter into discussions with the third parties regarding the
merits and value, if any, of the patents. These discussions, may materialize into license
agreements or patent claims asserted against us or our customers. If asserted against our
customers, our customers may request indemnification from us. It is not possible to determine the
impact of any such demands and the related discussions on ARRIS business, results of operations or
financial condition.
30
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Our business is dependent on customers capital spending on broadband communication systems,
and reductions by customers in capital spending adversely affect our business.
Our performance is dependent on customers capital spending for constructing, rebuilding,
maintaining or upgrading broadband communications systems. Capital spending in the
telecommunications industry is cyclical and can be curtailed or deferred on short notice. A
variety of factors affect the amount of capital spending, and, therefore, our sales and profits,
including:
|
|
|
general economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
customer specific financial or stock market conditions; |
|
|
|
|
availability and cost of capital; |
|
|
|
|
governmental regulation; |
|
|
|
|
demands for network services; |
|
|
|
|
competition from other providers of broadband and high speed services; |
|
|
|
|
acceptance of new services offered by our customers; and |
|
|
|
|
perceived trends or uncertainties in these factors. |
Several of our customers have accumulated significant levels of debt. These high debt levels,
coupled with the current turbulence and uncertainty in the capital markets, may impact their access
to capital in the future. Even if the financial health of our customers remains intact, these
customers may not purchase new equipment at levels we have seen in the past or expect in the
future. We cannot predict the impact if any of the recent financial market turmoil, or of specific
customer financial challenges on our customers expansion and maintenance expenditures.
The markets in which we operate are intensely competitive, and competitive pressures may adversely
affect our results of operations.
The markets for broadband communication systems are extremely competitive and dynamic, requiring
the companies that compete in these markets to react quickly and capitalize on change. This
requires us to retain skilled and experienced personnel as well as to deploy substantial resources
toward meeting the ever-changing demands of the industry. We compete with national and
international manufacturers, distributors and wholesalers including many companies that are larger
than we are. Our major competitors include:
|
|
|
Aurora Networks |
|
|
|
|
BigBand Networks |
|
|
|
|
Casa Systems, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
Cisco Systems, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
Commscope, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
Concurrent Computer Corporation |
|
|
|
|
Ericsson (TandbergTV) |
|
|
|
|
Harmonic, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
Motorola, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
SeaChange, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
SMC Networks |
|
|
|
|
Technicolor, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
TVC Communications, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
Ubee Interactive, Inc |
In some instances, notably our software products, our customers themselves may be our competition
as they may develop their own software. The rapid technological changes occurring in the broadband
markets may lead to the entry of new competitors, including those with substantially greater
resources than our own. Because the markets in which we compete are characterized by rapid growth
and, in some cases, low barriers to entry, smaller niche market companies and start-up ventures also may become principal competitors in the future.
Actions by existing competitors and the entry of new competitors may have an adverse effect on our
sales and profitability. The broadband communications industry is further characterized by rapid
technological change. In the future,
31
technological advances could lead to the obsolescence of some of our current products, which could
have a material adverse effect on our business.
Further, many of our larger competitors are in a better position to withstand any significant,
sustained reduction in capital spending by customers. They often have broader product lines and
market focus and therefore are not as susceptible to downturns in a particular market. In
addition, several of our competitors have been in operation longer than we have been, and therefore
they have more established relationships with domestic and foreign broadband service users. We may
not be able to compete successfully in the future, and competition may negatively impact our
business.
Consolidations in the telecommunications industry could result in delays or reductions in purchases
of products, which would have a material adverse effect on our business.
The telecommunications industry has experienced the consolidation of many industry participants.
When consolidations occur, it is possible that the acquirer will not continue using the same
suppliers, thereby possibly resulting in an immediate or future elimination of sales opportunities
for us or our competitors, depending upon who had the business initially. Consolidations also
could result in delays in purchasing decisions by the merged businesses. The purchasing decisions
of the merged companies could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Mergers among the supplier base also have increased. Larger combined companies with pooled capital
resources may be able to provide solution alternatives with which we would be put at a disadvantage
to compete. The larger breadth of product offerings by these consolidated suppliers could result
in customers electing to trim their supplier base for the advantages of one-stop shopping solutions
for all of their product needs. Consolidation of the supplier base could have a material adverse
effect on our business.
Our business is highly concentrated in the cable television portion of the telecommunications
industry which is significantly impacted by technological change.
The cable television industry has gone through dramatic technological change resulting in MSOs
rapidly migrating their business from a one-way television service to a two-way communications
network enabling multiple services, such as high speed Internet access, residential telephony
services, business telephony services and Internet access, video on demand and advertising
services. New services that are, or may be offered by MSOs and other service providers, such as
home security, power monitoring and control, high definition television, 3-D television, and a host
of other new home services also are based on and will be characterized by rapidly evolving
technology. The development of increasing transmission speed, density and bandwidth for Internet
traffic has also enabled the provision of high quality, feature length video over the Internet.
This so called over-the-top IP video service enables content providers such as Netflix, Hulu, CBS
and portals like Google to provide video services on-demand, by-passing traditional video service
providers. As these service providers enhance their quality and scalability, MSOs are moving to
match them and provide even more competitive services over their existing networks, as well as
over-the-top for delivery not only to televisions but to the computers, tablets, and telephones in
order to remain competitive. Our business is dependent on our ability to develop the products that
enable current and new customers to exploit these rapid technological changes. We believe the
growth of over-the-top video represents a shift in the traditional video delivery paradigm and we
cannot predict the effect it will have on our business.
In addition, the cable industry has and will continue to demand a move toward open standards. The
move toward open standards is expected to increase the number of MSOs that will offer new services.
This trend is expected to increase the number of competitors and drive down the capital costs per
subscriber deployed. These factors may adversely impact both our future revenues and margins.
Our business comes primarily from a few key customers. The loss of one of these customers or a
significant reduction in sales to one of these customers would have a material adverse effect on
our business.
Our two largest customers (including their affiliates, as applicable) are Comcast and Time Warner
Cable. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, sales to Comcast accounted for approximately 26.3%
and sales to Time Warner Cable accounted for approximately 13.2% of our total revenue. The loss of
either of these customers, or one of our other large customers, or a significant reduction in the
products or services provided to any of them, would have a material adverse impact on our business.
For each of these customers, we also are one of their largest suppliers. As a result, if from
time-to-time customers elect to purchase products from our competitors in order to
32
diversify their supplier base and to dual-source key products or to curtail purchasing due to
budgetary or market conditions, such decisions could have material consequences to our business. In
addition, because of the magnitude of our sales to these customers the terms and timing of our
sales are heavily negotiated, and even minor changes can have a significant impact upon our
business.
We may pursue acquisitions and investments that could adversely affect our business.
In the past, we have made acquisitions of and investments in businesses, products, and technologies
to complement or expand our business. While we have no announced plans for additional acquisitions,
future acquisitions are part of our strategic objectives and may occur. If we identify an
acquisition candidate, we may not be able to successfully negotiate or finance the acquisition or
integrate the acquired businesses, products, or technologies with our existing business and
products. Future acquisitions could result in potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities,
the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities, amortization expenses, and substantial goodwill.
We will test the goodwill that is created by acquisitions, at least annually and will record an
impairment charge if its value has declined. For instance, in the fourth quarter of 2008, we
recorded a substantial impairment charge with respect to the goodwill that was created as part of
our acquisition of C-COR.
We have substantial goodwill.
Our financial statements reflect substantial goodwill, approximately $233.4 million as of June 30,
2011, that was recognized in connection with the acquisitions that we have made. We annually (and
more frequently if changes in circumstances indicate that the asset may be impaired) review the
carrying amount of our goodwill in order to determine whether it has been impaired for accounting
purposes. In general, if the fair value of the corresponding reporting units goodwill is less
that the carrying value of the goodwill, we record an impairment charge. The determination of fair
value is dependent upon a number of factors, including assumptions about future cash flows and
growth rates that are based on our current and long-term business plans. No goodwill impairment
was recorded in 2009, 2010, or the first six months of 2011. We recorded a non-cash goodwill
impairment charge of $128.9 million and $80.4 million related to the ATS and MCS reporting units,
respectively, during the fourth quarter of 2008. As the ongoing expected cash flows and carrying
amounts of our remaining goodwill are assessed, changes in the economic conditions, changes to our
business strategy, changes in operating performance or other indicators of impairment could cause
us to realize additional impairment charges in the future. For additional information, see the
discussion under Critical Accounting Policies in Item 7 in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC).
We may have difficulty in forecasting our sales.
Because a significant portion of the purchases by our customers are discretionary, accurately
forecasting sales is difficult. In addition, in recent years our customers have submitted their
purchase orders less evenly over the course of each quarter and year and with shorter lead times
than they have historically. This has made it even more difficult for us to forecast sales and
other financial measures, which can result in us maintaining inventory levels that are too high or
too low for our ultimate needs.
Our business has and is expected to have higher levels of software sales which may result in
greater volatility in our operating results.
The level of our Media & Communications Systems sales fluctuates significantly quarter to
quarter which results in greater volatility of our operating results than has been typical in the
past, when the main source of volatility was the high proportion of quick-turn product sales. The
timing of revenue recognition on software and system sales is based on specific contract terms and,
in certain cases, is dependent upon completion of certain activities and customer acceptance which
are difficult to forecast accurately.
The level of software sales in our BCS segment is expected to increase. In the second quarter of
2011, we began to deliver software upgrades for our CMTS line cards.
Because the gross margins associated with software and systems sales are substantially higher than
our average gross margins, fluctuations in quarterly software sales have a disproportionate effect
on operating results and earnings per share and could result in our operating results falling short
of the expectations of the investment community.
33
Products currently under development may fail to realize anticipated benefits.
Rapidly changing technologies, evolving industry standards, frequent new product introductions and
relatively short product life cycles characterize the markets for our products. The technology
applications that we currently are developing may not ultimately be successful. Even if the
products in development are successfully brought to market, they may not be widely used or we may
not be able to successfully capitalize on their technology. To compete successfully, we must
quickly design, develop, manufacture and sell new or enhanced products that provide increasingly
higher levels of performance and reliability. However, we may not be able to successfully develop
or introduce these products if they:
|
|
|
are not cost-effective; |
|
|
|
|
are not brought to market in a timely manner; |
|
|
|
|
fail to achieve market acceptance; or |
|
|
|
|
fail to meet industry certification standards. |
Furthermore, our competitors may develop similar or alternative technologies that, if successful,
could have a material adverse effect on us. Our strategic alliances are based on business
relationships that have not been the subject of written agreements expressly providing for the
alliance to continue for a significant period of time. The loss of a strategic relationship could
have a material adverse effect on the progress of new products under development with that third
party.
Our success depends in large part on our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel in all
facets of our operations.
Competition for qualified personnel is intense, and we may not be successful in attracting and
retaining key personnel, which could impact our ability to maintain and grow our operations. Our
future success will depend, to a significant extent, on the ability of our management to operate
effectively. In the past, competitors and others have attempted to recruit our employees and in
the future, their attempts may continue. The loss of services of any key personnel, the inability
to attract and retain qualified personnel in the future or delays in hiring required personnel,
particularly engineers and other technical professionals, could negatively affect our business.
We are substantially dependent on contract manufacturers, and an inability to obtain adequate and
timely delivery of supplies could adversely affect our business.
Many components, subassemblies and modules necessary for the manufacture or integration of our
products are obtained from a sole supplier or a limited group of suppliers. Our reliance on sole
or limited suppliers, particularly foreign suppliers, and our reliance on subcontractors involves
several risks including a potential inability to obtain an adequate supply of required components,
subassemblies or modules and reduced control over pricing, quality and timely delivery of
components, subassemblies or modules. Historically, we have not maintained long-term agreements
with any of our suppliers or subcontractors. An inability to obtain adequate deliveries or any
other circumstance that would require us to seek alternative sources of supply could affect our
ability to ship products on a timely basis. Any inability to reliably ship our products on time
could damage relationships with current and prospective customers and harm our business.
Our international operations may be adversely affected by any decline in the demand for broadband
systems designs and equipment in international markets.
Sales of broadband communications equipment into international markets are an important part of our
business. Our products are marketed and made available to existing and new potential international
customers. In addition, United States broadband system designs and equipment are increasingly being
employed in international markets, where market penetration is relatively lower than in the United
States. While international operations are expected to comprise an integral part of our future
business, international markets may no longer continue to develop at the current rate, or at all.
We may fail to receive additional contracts to supply equipment in these markets.
Our international operations may be adversely affected by changes in the foreign laws in the
countries in which we and our manufacturers and assemblers have plants.
34
A significant portion of our products are manufactured or assembled in China, Ireland, Mexico, and
other countries outside of the United States. The governments of the foreign countries in which our
products are manufactured may pass laws that impair our operations, such as laws that impose
exorbitant tax obligations or nationalize these manufacturing facilities.
In addition, we own a manufacturing facility located in Tijuana, Mexico. This operation is exposed
to certain risks as a result of its location, including:
|
|
|
changes in international trade laws, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement and
Prosec, affecting our import and export activities; |
|
|
|
|
changes in, or expiration of, the Mexican governments IMMEX (Manufacturing Industry
Maquiladora and Export Services) program, which provides economic benefits to us; |
|
|
|
|
changes in labor laws and regulations affecting our ability to hire and retain
employees; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations of foreign currency and exchange controls; |
|
|
|
|
potential political instability and changes in the Mexican government; |
|
|
|
|
potential regulatory changes; and |
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions in Mexico. |
Any of these risks could interfere with the operation of this facility and result in reduced
production, increased costs, or both. In the event that production capacity of this facility is
reduced, we could fail to ship products on schedule and could face a reduction in future orders
from dissatisfied customers. If our costs to operate this facility increase, our margins would
decrease. Reduced shipments and margins would have an adverse effect on our financial results.
We face risks relating to currency fluctuations and currency exchange.
On an ongoing basis we are exposed to various changes in foreign currency rates because significant
sales are denominated in foreign currencies. These risk factors can impact our results of
operations, cash flows and financial position. We manage these risks through regular operating and
financing activities and periodically use derivative financial instruments such as foreign exchange
forward and option contracts. There can be no assurance that our risk management strategies will be
effective.
We also may encounter difficulties in converting our earnings from international operations to U.S.
dollars for use in the United States. These obstacles may include problems moving funds out of the
countries in which the funds were earned and difficulties in collecting accounts receivable in
foreign countries where the usual accounts receivable payment cycle is longer.
We depend on channel partners to sell our products in certain regions and are subject to risks
associated with these arrangements.
We utilize distributors, value-added resellers, system integrators, and manufacturers
representatives to sell our products to certain customers and in certain geographic regions to
improve our access to these customers and regions and to lower our overall cost of sales and
post-sales support. Our sales through channel partners are subject to a number of risks,
including:
|
|
|
ability of our selected channel partners to effectively sell our products to end
customers; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to continue channel partner arrangements into the future since most are for
a limited term and subject to mutual agreement to extend; |
|
|
|
|
a reduction in gross margins realized on sale of our products; and |
|
|
|
|
a diminution of contact with end customers which, over time, could adversely impact our
ability to develop new products that meet customers evolving requirements. |
Our stock price has been and may continue to be volatile.
Our common stock is currently traded on The NASDAQ Global Select Market. The trading price of our
common stock has been and may continue to be subject to large fluctuations. Our stock price may
increase or decrease in response to a number of events and factors including:
|
|
|
future announcements concerning us, key customers or competitors;
|
35
|
|
|
quarterly variations in operating results; |
|
|
|
|
changes in financial estimates and recommendations by securities analysts; |
|
|
|
|
developments with respect to technology or litigation; |
|
|
|
|
the operating and stock price performance of our competitors; and |
|
|
|
|
acquisitions and financings |
Fluctuations in the stock market, generally, also impact the volatility of our stock price.
General stock market movements may adversely affect the price of our common stock, regardless of
our operating performance.
We may face higher costs associated with protecting our intellectual property or obtaining access
necessary to intellectual property of others.
Our future success depends in part upon our proprietary technology, product development,
technological expertise and distribution channels. We cannot predict whether we can protect our
technology or whether competitors can develop similar technology independently. We have received,
directly or indirectly, and may continue to receive from third parties, including some of our
competitors, notices claiming that we, or our customers using our products, have infringed upon
third-party patents or other proprietary rights. We are a defendant in proceedings (and other
proceedings have been threatened) in which our customers were sued for patent infringement and
sued, or made claims against, us and other suppliers for indemnification, and we may become
involved in similar litigation involving these and other customers in the future. These claims,
regardless of their merit, result in costly litigation, divert the time, attention and resources of
our management, delay our product shipments, and, in some cases, require us to enter into royalty
or licensing agreements. If a claim of product infringement against us is successful and we fail to
obtain a license or develop non-infringing technology, our business and operating results could be
materially and adversely affected. In addition, the payment of any damages or any necessary
licensing fees or indemnification costs associated with a patent infringement claim could be
material and could also materially adversely affect our operating results. See Part II, Item 1,
Legal Proceedings.
We do not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Although from time to time we may consider repurchasing shares of our common stock, we do not
anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. In addition, the
payment of dividends in certain circumstances may be prohibited by the terms of our current and
future indebtedness.
We have anti-takeover defenses that could delay or prevent an acquisition of our company.
We have a shareholder rights plan (commonly known as a poison pill). This plan is not intended
to prevent a takeover, but is intended to protect and maximize the value of stockholders
interests. However, the plan could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us or may
delay that process.
We have the ability to issue preferred shares without stockholder approval.
Our common shares may be subordinate to classes of preferred shares issued in the future in the
payment of dividends and other distributions made with respect to common shares, including
distributions upon liquidation or dissolution. Our Certificate of Incorporation permits our board
of directors to issue preferred shares without first obtaining stockholder approval. If we issued
preferred shares, these additional securities may have dividend or liquidation preferences senior
to the common shares. If we issue convertible preferred shares, a subsequent conversion may dilute
the current common stockholders interest.
36
Item 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer, filed herewith |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer, filed herewith |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer, filed herewith |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer, filed herewith |
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instant Document, filed herewith |
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document, filed herewith |
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document, filed herewith |
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document, filed herewith |
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document, filed herewith |
37
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARRIS GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
/s/ David B. Potts
|
|
|
David B. Potts |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer, Chief Accounting
Officer, and Chief Information
Officer |
|
|
Dated: August 5, 2011
38