UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
Date of report (Date of earliest event reported) |
|
June 23, 2008
|
Republic Services, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
|
|
|
1-14267
|
|
65-0716904 |
|
|
|
(Commission File Number)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
110 SE 6th Street, 28th Floor, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
|
|
33301 |
|
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(954) 769-2400
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy
the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General
Instruction A.2. below):
o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))
o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13d-4(c))
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM 8.01. OTHER EVENTS.
On March 28, 2007, Republic Services of Ohio II, LLC (Republic-Ohio), an Ohio limited liability
company and wholly owned subsidiary of Republic Services, Inc. (the Company), was issued Final
Findings and Orders (the F&Os) from the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA). The F&Os
relate to environmental conditions attributed to a chemical reaction resulting from the disposal of
certain aluminum production waste at the Countywide Recycling and Disposal Facility (Countywide)
in East Sparta, Ohio. The F&Os and certain other remedial actions Republic-Ohio has agreed with
the OEPA to undertake to address the environmental conditions, include, without limitation, the
following actions: (a) prohibiting leachate recirculation, (b) refraining from the disposal of
solid waste in certain portions of the site, (c) updating engineering plans and specifications and
providing further information regarding the integrity of various engineered components at the site,
(d) performing additional data collection, (e) taking additional measures to address emissions, (f)
expanding the gas collection and control system, (g) installing a fire break, (h) removing
liquids from gas extraction wells, and (i) submitting a plan to the OEPA to suppress the chemical
reaction and, following approval by the OEPA, implementing such plan. Currently, Republic-Ohio is
performing certain interim remedial actions required by the OEPA, but the OEPA has not approved
Republic-Ohios plan to suppress the chemical reaction.
Republic-Ohio recently received additional orders from the OEPA. These orders require certain
actions to be taken by Republic-Ohio at Countywide including additional air quality monitoring and
the installation and continued maintenance of gas well dewatering systems.
Republic-Ohio also entered into an Agreed Order on Consent (AOC) with the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). The AOC requires reimbursement of costs incurred by
the U.S. EPA and requires certain actions to be taken by Republic-Ohio at Countywide including,
without limitation: (a) designing and installing a temperature and gas monitoring system, (b)
designing and installing a composite cap or cover, and (c) developing and implementing an air
monitoring program.
Based upon current information and engineering analyses and discussions with the OEPA and U.S. EPA
subsequent to the signing of the above-mentioned agreements, the Company now believes that the
costs for Republic-Ohio to comply with the ongoing requirements of the F&Os, the additional orders
received from the OEPA and the orders received from the U.S. EPA will be approximately $34 million
in excess of costs previously accrued. These costs include placing an enhanced cap (in excess of
Countywides current permit requirements) over certain portions of the landfill. The Company will
record a $34 million charge to income from continuing operations before provision for income taxes,
or approximately $.11 per diluted share, during the three months ending June 30, 2008, based on
managements best estimates of the incremental costs of compliance. The Company will adjust this
charge, if necessary, to reflect the effects of new or additional information, to the extent that
such information impacts the costs, timing or duration of the required actions. Approximately $8
million of these additional costs are expected to be paid during the remainder of 2008. The
remaining additional costs are expected to be paid during 2009 through 2011.
The Company intends to comply fully with the orders issued by the U.S. EPA. In addition, the
Company has complied with the orders previously issued by the OEPA. However, it has requested
relief with respect to certain requirements of the orders received from the OEPA as it believes
such requirements should no longer be considered essential in light of the work the Company has now
agreed with the U.S. EPA to perform.
The Company has previously provided extensive disclosure regarding the environmental conditions at Countywide in its Current Reports on Form 8-K dated
April 3, 2007 and October 18, 2007, as well as in its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q beginning with the period ended March 31, 2007 and in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. The Company invites the
reader to review these prior filings for a history of this matter.
The Company is also reaffirming its previous guidance for free cash flow for 2008 of $340 million
to $350 million. This guidance includes payments that are expected to be made during 2008
associated with the charges that the Company will have recorded through June 30, 2008 for
Countywide.
Certain statements and information included herein constitute forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the Federal Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such
forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which
may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements of the Company to be materially
different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied in or by such
forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among other things, whether the Companys
estimates and assumptions concerning its selected balance sheet accounts, final capping, closure,
post-closure and remediation costs, available airspace, and projected costs and expenses related to
the Companys landfills turn out to be correct or appropriate, compliance with, and future changes
in, environmental
regulations, the Companys ability to obtain approvals from regulatory agencies in connection
with operating and expanding the Companys landfills, risks associated with undisclosed liabilities
of acquired businesses, and other factors contained in the Companys filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
2