Edgar Filing: BIMINI CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.

bmnm10q20110930.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to ___________

Commission File Number: 001-32171

Bimini Capital Management, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Maryland		72-1571637
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3305 Flamingo Drive, Vero Beach, Florida 32963

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(772) 231-1400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted to its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES þ NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller Reporting Company ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES ¨ NO þ

As of November 3, 2011, the number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Class A Common Stock, $0.001 par value, was 9,977,059; the number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Class B Common Stock, $0.001 par value, was 31,938; and the number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Class C Common Stock, $0.001 par value, was 31,938.

BIMINI CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.

INDEX

PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.		Financial Statements:
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2011 (unaudited) and December 31, 2010			1
Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010			2
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (unaudited) for the nine months ended September 30, 2011			3
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010			4
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)			5
ITEM 2.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	23
ITEM 3.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	37
ITEM 4.		Controls and Procedures	37

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1.		Legal Proceedings	37
ITEM 1A.		Risk Factors	38
ITEM 2.		Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	39
ITEM 6.		Exhibits	40
		SIGNATURES	42

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

BIMINI CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	(Unaudited)
	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
ASSETS:
Mortgage-backed securities, at fair value
Pledged to counterparties, at fair value	$	69,396,500		$	117,253,931
Unpledged, at fair value		18,800,726			17,879,409
Total mortgage-backed securities		88,197,226			135,133,340
Cash and cash equivalents		3,926,764			2,830,584
Restricted cash		1,744,568			3,545,885
Retained interests in securitizations		4,942,492			3,927,777
Accrued interest receivable		1,015,552			1,049,577
Property and equipment, net		3,913,655			3,894,717
Prepaids and other assets, net		5,405,704			6,609,043
Total Assets	$	109,145,961		$	156,990,923

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

LIABILITIES:
Repurchase agreements, net	$	67,395,843		$	113,591,685
Junior subordinated notes due to Bimini Capital Trust II		26,804,440			26,804,440
Accrued interest payable		71,084			120,410
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other		7,166,171			8,102,062
Total Liabilities		101,437,538			148,618,597

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; designated, 1,800,000
shares as Class A Redeemable and 2,000,000 shares as Class B Redeemable; no
shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010		-			-
Class A Common Stock, $0.001 par value; 98,000,000 shares designated: 9,977,059
shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2011 and 9,776,586 shares
issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2010		9,977			9,777
Class B Common Stock, $0.001 par value; 1,000,000 shares designated, 31,938 shares
issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010		32			32
Class C Common Stock, $0.001 par value; 1,000,000 shares designated, 31,938 shares
issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010		32			32
Additional paid-in capital		334,010,246			334,459,072
Accumulated deficit		(326,311,864	)		(326,096,587	)
Total Stockholders’ Equity		7,708,423			8,372,326
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	109,145,961		$	156,990,923
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

-1-

BIMINI CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Interest income	$	4,046,746		$	4,969,604		$	1,133,540		$	1,261,563
Interest expense		(211,519	)		(190,388	)		(52,714	)		(68,772	)
Net interest income, before interest on junior subordinated notes		3,835,227			4,779,216			1,080,826			1,192,791
Interest expense on junior subordinated notes		(749,682	)		(1,649,944	)		(250,052	)		(549,982	)
Net interest income		3,085,545			3,129,272			830,774			642,809
Losses on mortgage-backed securities		(342,624	)		(1,285,816	)		(1,978,544	)		(344,360	)
Losses on Eurodollar futures		(1,177,712	)		(498,712	)		(822,300	)		(348,725	)
Net portfolio income (deficiency)		1,565,209			1,344,744			(1,970,070	)		(50,276	)

Other income:
Gains on retained interests in securitizations		3,891,631			2,895,955			2,450,587			1,527,778
Other (expense) income		(51,895	)		208,986			(15,013	)		(2,780	)
Total other income		3,839,736			3,104,941			2,435,574			1,524,998

Expenses:
Compensation and related benefits		1,392,853			1,476,501			443,041			457,695
Directors' fees and liability insurance		453,201			378,087			150,338			115,707
Audit, legal and other professional fees		2,710,630			2,233,014			1,432,921			807,798
Direct REIT operating expenses		403,252			444,924			131,626			147,571
Other administrative		660,286			816,378			220,786			190,725
Total expenses		5,620,222			5,348,904			2,378,712			1,719,496

Loss before income taxes		(215,277	)		(899,219	)		(1,913,208	)		(244,774	)

Income tax benefit		-			(145,000	)		-			(130,000	)

Net loss	$	(215,277	)	$	(754,219	)	$	(1,913,208	)	$	(114,774	)

Basic and Diluted Net loss Per Share of:
CLASS A COMMON STOCK
Basic and Diluted	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.19	)	$	(0.01	)
CLASS B COMMON STOCK
Basic and Diluted	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.19	)	$	(0.01	)
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding
CLASS A COMMON STOCK
Basic and Diluted		9,852,956			9,539,145			9,916,755			10,074,233
CLASS B COMMON STOCK
Basic and Diluted		31,938			31,938			31,938			31,938
Dividends Declared Per Common Share:
CLASS A COMMON STOCK	$	0.065		$	0.06		$	0.0325		$	-
CLASS B COMMON STOCK	$	0.065		$	0.06		$	0.0325		$	-
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

-2-

BIMINI CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Unaudited)

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011

	Common Stock,							Additional
	Amounts at par value							Paid-in			Accumulated
	Class A			Class B		Class C		Capital			Deficit			Total
Balances, January 1, 2011	$	9,777		$	32	$	32	$	334,459,072		$	(326,096,587	)	$	8,372,326
Net loss		-			-		-		-			(215,277	)		(215,277	)
Dividends declared		-			-		-		(669,077	)		-			(669,077	)
Issuance of Class A common shares for board
compensation and equity plan exercises		201			-		-		150,832			-			151,033
Shares repurchased from employees in
satisfaction of withholding requirements
on equity plan distributions		(1	)		-		-		(595	)		-			(596	)
Amortization of equity plan compensation		-			-		-		70,014			-			70,014

Balances, September 30, 2011	$	9,977		$	32	$	32	$	334,010,246		$	(326,311,864	)	$	7,708,423
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

-3-

BIMINI CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(215,277	)	$	(754,219	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Stock based compensation and equity plan amortization		221,047			183,714
Depreciation and amortization		89,590			183,581
Losses on mortgage-backed securities		342,624			1,285,816
Gains on retained interests in securitizations		(3,891,631	)		(2,895,955	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accrued interest receivable		34,025			(4,184	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets, net		1,204,684			3,013,111
Accrued interest payable		(49,326	)		(19,515	)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other		(935,891	)		(694,808	)
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES		(3,200,155	)		297,541

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
From mortgage-backed securities investments:
Purchases		(46,317,169	)		(130,415,299	)
Sales		73,326,473			92,104,494
Principal repayments		19,582,841			25,995,565
Principal payments received on retained interests in securitizations		2,876,916			3,356,695
Decrease in restricted cash		1,801,317			990,789
Purchases of property and equipment		(108,528	)		(5,624	)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES		51,161,850			(7,973,380	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from repurchase agreements		317,815,006			387,531,457
Principal payments on repurchase agreements		(364,010,848	)		(380,529,160	)
Dividends paid in cash		(669,077	)		(2,507,729	)
Stock repurchases		(596	)		(51,032	)
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		(46,865,515	)		4,443,536

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		1,096,180			(3,232,303	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of the period		2,830,584			6,469,795
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of the period	$	3,926,764		$	3,237,492

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	1,010,527		$	1,742,116
Income taxes		17,706			910,538

SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Dividends paid in shares of Class A Common Stock		-			16,654,837

See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

-4-

BIMINI CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

September 30, 2011

NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Organization and Business Description

Bimini Capital Management, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“Bimini Capital”), was originally formed in September 2003 for the purpose of creating and managing a leveraged investment portfolio consisting of residential mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”). Bimini Capital has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). As a REIT, Bimini Capital is generally not subject to federal income tax on its REIT taxable income provided that it distributes to its stockholders at least 90% of its REIT taxable income on an annual basis. In addition, a REIT must meet other provisions of the Code to retain its special tax status. Bimini Capital’s website is located at http://www.biminicapital.com.

On November 3, 2005, Bimini Capital acquired Opteum Financial Services, LLC (“OFS”), and at closing, it became a wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiary (or “TRS”) of Bimini Capital. This entity was renamed Orchid Island TRS, LLC (“OITRS”) effective July 3, 2007 and then renamed MortCo TRS, LLC (“MortCo”) effective March 8, 2011. Hereinafter, any historical mention, discussion or references to Opteum Financial Services, LLC, Orchid Island TRS, LLC, OFS or to OITRS (such as in previously filed documents or Exhibits) now means MortCo TRS, LLC or “MortCo.”

As used in this document, discussions related to “Bimini Capital,” the parent company, the registrant, and to REIT qualifying activities or the general management of Bimini Capital’s portfolio of MBS refer to “Bimini Capital Management, Inc.” and its wholly-owned qualified REIT subsidiary, Orchid Island Capital, Inc. (“Orchid”). Discussions related to Bimini Capital’s taxable REIT subsidiaries or non-REIT eligible assets refer to Bimini Advisors, Inc. (“Bimini Advisors”) and MortCo and its consolidated subsidiaries. Discussions relating to “the Company” refer to the consolidated entity.

Liquidity

At September 30, 2011, Bimini Capital had an equity capital base of $7.7 million and an MBS portfolio of $88.2 million. The crisis in the U.S. financial markets during 2008/2009, and the material losses incurred by the Company in 2006 and 2007 attributable to the former mortgage origination operations of MortCo, have significantly reduced Bimini Capital’s equity capital base and the size of its MBS portfolio. Ongoing litigation costs stemming from the former operations of MortCo and Bimini Capital itself cause the Company’s overhead to be high in relation to its portfolio size. In response, during the past two years, the Company has taken significant steps to reduce the leverage in its balance sheet, reduce its debt service costs, and alter its investment strategy for holding MBS securities. The Company’s alternative investment strategy that utilizes structured MBS has been elevated to a core element of its investment strategy and liquidity management. However, the Company’s ability to utilize this element of our investment strategy is limited by restrictions imposed under the Investment Company Act. Further, if cash resources are, at any time, insufficient to satisfy the Company’s liquidity requirements, such as when cash flow from operations are materially negative, the Company may be required to pledge additional assets to meet margin calls, liquidate assets, sell additional debt or equity securities or pursue other financing alternatives.

-5-

Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates

The accompanying consolidated financial statements are prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates affecting the accompanying financial statements include the fair values of MBS, Eurodollar futures contracts, retained interests and asset valuation allowances.

Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Bimini Capital and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Orchid, Bimini Advisors and MortCo, as well as the wholly-owned subsidiaries of MortCo. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated from the consolidated financial statements.

As further described in Note 6, Bimini Capital has a common share investment in a trust used in connection with the issuance of Bimini Capital’s junior subordinated notes. Pursuant to the applicable accounting guidance for variable interest entities, Bimini Capital’s common share investment in the trust has not been consolidated in the financial statements of Bimini Capital, and accordingly, this investment has been accounted for on the equity method.

Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 220, Comprehensive Income, a statement of comprehensive income has not been included as the Company has no items of other comprehensive income. Comprehensive loss is the same as net loss for all periods presented.

Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on deposit with financial institutions and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. Restricted cash represents cash held on deposit as collateral with the repurchase agreement counterparties, which may be used to make principal and interest payments on the related repurchase agreements, and cash held by a broker as margin on Eurodollar futures contracts.

Cash and cash equivalents are maintained at financial institutions and, at times, balances may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has never experienced any losses related to these balances. All non-interest bearing cash balances were fully insured at September 30, 2011 due to a temporary federal program in effect from December 31, 2010 through December 31, 2012. Under the program, there is no limit to the amount of insurance for eligible accounts. Beginning in 2013, insurance coverage will revert to $250,000 per depositor at each financial institution, and our non-interest bearing cash balances may again exceed federally insured limits. Interest-bearing amounts on deposit that would have been in excess of the $250,000 federally insured limit at September 30, 2011 approximated $1.5 million.

-6-

Mortgage-Backed Securities

The Company invests primarily in mortgage pass-through (“PT”) certificates, collateralized mortgage obligations, interest only (“IO”) securities and inverse interest only (“IIO”) securities representing interest in or obligations backed by pools of mortgage loans (collectively, MBS). MBS transactions are recorded on the trade date. The Company has elected to account for its investment in MBS under the fair value option. These investments meet the requirements to be classified as available for sale under ASC 320-10-25, Debt and Equity Securities, which requires the securities to be carried at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheet with changes in fair value charged to Other Comprehensive Income, a component of Stockholders’ Equity. Electing the fair value option allows the Company to record changes in fair value in the Statement of Operations, which, in management’s view, more appropriately reflects the results of our operations for a particular reporting period and is consistent with the underlying economics and how the portfolio is managed.

The fair value of the Company’s investments in MBS is governed by FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. The definition of fair value in FASB ASC Topic 820 focuses on the price that would be received to sell the asset or paid to transfer the liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability either occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability, or in the absence of a principal market, occurs in the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. Estimated fair values for MBS are based on the average of third-party broker quotes received and/or independent pricing sources when available.

Income on MBS pass-through securities is based on the stated interest rate of the security. Premiums or discounts present at the date of purchase are not amortized. For interest only securities, the income is accrued based on the carrying value and the effective yield. Cash received is first applied to accrued interest and then to reduce the carrying value. At each reporting date, the effective yield is adjusted prospectively from the reporting period based on the new estimate of prepayments and the contractual terms of the security. For inverse interest only securities, effective yield and income recognition calculations also take into account the index value applicable to the security.

Retained Interests

Retained interests in the subordinated tranches of securities created in securitization transactions were initially recorded at their fair value when issued by MortCo. Subsequent adjustments to fair value are reflected in earnings. Quoted market prices for these assets are generally not available, so the Company estimates fair value based on the present value of expected future cash flows using management’s best estimates of key assumptions, which include expected credit losses, prepayment speeds, weighted-average life, and discount rates commensurate with the inherent risks of the asset.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company has entered into derivative financial instruments to manage interest rate risk, facilitate asset/liability strategies, and manage other exposures, and it may continue to do so in the future. The Company has elected to not treat any of its derivative financial instruments as hedges. FASB ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, requires that all derivative investments be carried at fair value.

-7-

Financial Instruments

FASB ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments, requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value, either in the body of the financial statements or in the accompanying notes. MBS, Eurodollar futures contracts, mortgage loans held for sale and retained interests in securitization transactions are accounted for at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets. The methods and assumptions used to estimate fair value for these instruments are presented in Note 12 of the financial statements.

The estimated fair value of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accrued interest receivable, net repurchase agreements, accrued interest payable and accounts payable and other liabilities generally approximates their carrying value as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments.

It is impractical to estimate the fair value of the Company’s junior subordinated notes. Currently, there is a limited market for these types of instruments and the Company is unable to ascertain what interest rates would be available to the Company for similar financial instruments. Information regarding carrying amounts, effective interest rates and maturity dates for these instruments is presented in Note 6 to the financial statements.

Property and Equipment, net

Property and equipment, net, consists of computer equipment with a depreciable life of 3 years, office furniture and equipment with depreciable lives of 8 to 20 years, land which has no depreciable life, and buildings and improvements with depreciable lives of 30 years. Property and equipment is recorded at acquisition cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.

Bimini Capital’s property and equipment as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, is presented net of accumulated depreciation of approximately $782,000 and $692,000, respectively. Depreciation expense was approximately $90,000 and $29,000 for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, and $66,000 and $21,000 for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2010, respectively.

Repurchase Agreements

The Company finances the acquisition of its PT MBS through the use of repurchase agreements. Repurchase agreements are treated as collateralized financing transactions and are carried at their contractual amounts, including accrued interest, as specified in the respective agreements. Although structured as a sale and repurchase obligation, a repurchase agreement operates as a financing under which securities are pledged as collateral to secure a short-term loan equal in value to a specified percentage (generally between 90 and 95 percent) of the market value of the pledged collateral. While used as collateral, the borrower retains beneficial ownership of the pledged collateral, including the right to distributions. At the maturity of a repurchase agreement, the borrower is required to repay the loan and concurrently receive the pledged collateral from the lender or, with the consent of the lender, renew such agreement at the then prevailing financing rate. Margin calls, whereby a lender requires that the Company pledge additional securities or cash as collateral to secure borrowings under its repurchase agreements with such a lender, are routinely experienced by the Company when the value of the MBS pledged as collateral declines or as a result of principal amortization or due to changes in market interest rates, spreads or other market conditions.

-8-

The Company’s repurchase agreements typically have terms ranging from one month to six months at inception, with some having longer terms. Should a counterparty decide not to renew a repurchase agreement at maturity, the Company must either refinance with another lender or be in a position to satisfy the obligation. If, during the term of a repurchase agreement, a lender should file for bankruptcy, the Company might experience difficulty recovering its pledged assets which could result in an unsecured claim against the lender for the difference between the amount loaned to the Company plus interest due to the counterparty and the fair value of the collateral pledged to such lender including accrued interest and cash posted as collateral. At September 30, 2011, the Company had outstanding balances under repurchase agreements with two lenders with a maximum amount at risk (the difference between the amount loaned to the Company, including interest payable, and the fair value of the collateral pledged by the Company, including accrued interest and cash posted as collateral) of $3.5 million.

Share-Based Compensation

The Company follows the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation, to account for stock and stock-based awards. For stock and stock-based awards issued to employees, a compensation charge is recorded against earnings over the vesting period based on the fair value of the award. Payments pursuant to dividend equivalent rights, which are granted along with certain equity based awards, are charged to stockholders’ equity when declared. The Company applies a zero forfeiture rate for its equity based awards, as such awards have been granted to a limited number of employees and historical forfeitures have been minimal. A significant forfeiture, or an indication that significant forfeitures may occur, would result in a revised forfeiture rate which would be accounted for prospectively as a change in an estimate. For transactions with non-employees in which services are performed in exchange for the Company's common stock or other equity instruments, the transactions are recorded on the basis of the fair value of the service received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more readily measurable at the date of issuance.

Earnings Per Share

The Company follows the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 260, Earnings Per Share, which requires companies with complex capital structures, common stock equivalents or two (or more) classes of securities that participate in the declared dividends to present both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) on the face of the consolidated statement of operations. Basic EPS is calculated as income available to common stockholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is calculated using the “if converted” method for common stock equivalents. However, the common stock equivalents are not included in computing diluted EPS if the result is anti-dilutive.

Outstanding shares of Class B Common Stock, participating and convertible into Class A Common Stock, are entitled to receive dividends in an amount equal to the dividends declared on each share of Class A Common Stock if, as and when authorized and declared by the Board of Directors. Accordingly, shares of the Class B Common Stock are included in the computation of basic EPS using the two-class method and, consequently, are presented separately from Class A Common Stock.

The shares of Class C Common Stock are not included in the basic EPS computation as these shares do not have participation rights. The outstanding shares of Class B and Class C Common Stock are not included in the computation of diluted EPS for the Class A Common Stock as the conditions for conversion into shares of Class A Common Stock were not met.

-9-

Income Taxes

Bimini Capital, including its wholly-owned qualified REIT subsidiary, has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code. Bimini Capital will generally not be subject to federal income tax on its REIT taxable income to the extent that Bimini Capital distributes its REIT taxable income to its stockholders and satisfies the ongoing REIT requirements, including meeting certain asset, income and stock ownership tests. A REIT must generally distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income to its stockholders, of which 85% generally must be distributed within the taxable year, in order to avoid the imposition of an excise tax. The remaining balance may be distributed up to the end of the following taxable year, provided the REIT elects to treat such amount as a prior year distribution and meets certain other requirements. At September 30, 2011, management believes that the Company has complied with Code requirements and Bimini Capital continues to qualify as a REIT. As further described in Note 10, Income Taxes, Bimini Advisors and MortCo are taxpaying entities for income tax purposes and are taxed separately from the REIT. The Company files separate federal and state tax returns for the REIT, and for each of the taxable REIT subsidiaries. Generally, returns for all periods after 2007 remain open for examination.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentations, including the reporting of MortCo as described below.

During the second quarter of 2007, the Company closed the mortgage wholesale and conduit mortgage loan origination channels of MortCo and subsequently sold substantially all of the operating assets of MortCo. MortCo was reported after that date as a discontinued operation following applicable accounting standards. Through September 30, 2010, most of the remaining assets and liabilities were considered to be contingent and were held by MortCo pursuant to the terms of the disposal of the operations. The disposal of the retained interests asset was delayed as a result of the lingering effects of the financial market crisis and a significant lack of investor interest in such securities, even though the Company made efforts to market such securities to previously active market participants. Because MortCo continued to hold these net assets, effective October 1, 2010, the assets and liabilities previously classified as held for sale were reclassified to held and used for all periods presented.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-05 (“ASU”) amending the authoritative guidance to allow an entity the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. This ASU eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity, but does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. The provisions of this amendment require retrospective application, and are effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We anticipate that the adoption of this ASU will have no effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

-10-

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04 amending authoritative guidance to establish common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRSs”). The ASU changes the wording used to describe many of the requirements in GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements to ensure consistency between GAAP and IFRSs as well as expand the disclosures for Level 3 measurements. The ASU is to be applied prospectively, and are effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We anticipate that the adoption of this ASU will not have a materially effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-03 regarding repurchase agreements. In a typical repurchase agreement transaction, an entity transfers financial assets to a counterparty in exchange for cash with an agreement for the counterparty to return the same or equivalent financial assets for a fixed price in the future. Prior to this ASU, one of the factors in determining whether sale treatment could be used was whether the transferor maintained effective control of the transferred assets and in order to do so, the transferor must have the ability to repurchase such assets. Based on this ASU, the Financial Accounting Standards Board concluded that the assessment of effective control should focus on a transferor’s contractual rights and obligations with respect to transferred financial assets, rather than whether the transferor has the practical ability to perform in accordance with those rights or obligations. Therefore, this ASU removes the transferor’s ability to perform criterion from consideration of effective control. This ASU is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011. Since the Company records repurchase agreements as secured borrowings and not sales, this ASU will have no effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 2. MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES

The following table presents the Company’s MBS portfolio as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

(in thousands)
	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Pass-Through Certificates:
Hybrid Adjustable-rate Mortgages	$	5,149	$	2,783
Adjustable-rate Mortgages		35,528		64,458
Fixed-rate Mortgages		28,719		50,013
Total Pass-Through Certificates		69,396		117,254
Structured MBS Certificates:
Structured MBS		18,801		17,879
Totals	$	88,197	$	135,133

The following table summarizes the Company’s MBS portfolio as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, according to their contractual maturities. Actual maturities of MBS investments are generally shorter than stated contractual maturities and are affected by the contractual lives of the underlying mortgages, periodic payments of principal, and prepayments of principal.

(in thousands)
	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Less than one year	$	275	$	-
Greater than one year and less than five years		276		1,600
Greater than five years and less than ten years		9,315		9,077
Greater than or equal to ten years		78,331		124,456
Totals	$	88,197	$	135,133

-11-

NOTE 3. RETAINED INTERESTS IN SECURITIZATIONS

The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of the Company’s residual interests in asset backed securities as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

(in thousands)
Series	Issue Date	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
HMAC 2004-1	March 4, 2004	$	223	$	430
HMAC 2004-2	May 10, 2004		1,332		921
HMAC 2004-3	June 30, 2004		995		911
HMAC 2004-4	August 16, 2004		1,125		558
HMAC 2004-5	September 28, 2004		1,267		1,108
Total		$	4,942	$	3,928

NOTE 4. REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS

As of September 30, 2011, Bimini Capital had outstanding net repurchase obligations of approximately $67.4 million with a net weighted average borrowing rate of 0.29%. These agreements were collateralized by MBS with a fair value, including accrued interest, of approximately $69.6 million. As of December 31, 2010, Bimini Capital had outstanding repurchase obligations of approximately $113.6 million with a net weighted average borrowing rate of 0.32%. These agreements were collateralized by MBS with a fair value of approximately $117.6 million.

On occasion, the Company may enter into reverse repurchase agreements to facilitate the sale of selected positions in its PT MBS portfolio without unwinding an existing repurchase agreement. In accordance with the terms of a master repurchase agreement with the counterparty, repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements are reported net in the consolidated balance sheet. As of September 30, 2011, the Company had outstanding reverse repurchase agreements with two counterparties totaling approximately $10.5 million.

As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, Bimini Capital's net repurchase agreements had remaining maturities as summarized below:

(in thousands)
	OVERNIGHT		BETWEEN 2			BETWEEN 31			GREATER
	(1 DAY OR		AND			AND			THAN
	LESS)		30 DAYS			90 DAYS			90 DAYS		TOTAL
September 30, 2011
Agency Backed Mortgage-Backed Securities:
Fair market value of securities pledged, including
accrued interest receivable	$	-	$	54,123		$	15,483		$	-	$	69,606
Repurchase agreement liabilities associated with
these securities	$	-	$	51,649		$	15,747		$	-	$	67,396
Net weighted average borrowing rate		-		0.30	%		0.26	%		-		0.29	%
December 31, 2010
Agency Backed Mortgage-Backed Securities:
Fair market value of securities pledged, including
accrued interest receivable	$	-	$	75,175		$	42,415		$	-	$	117,590
Repurchase agreement liabilities associated with
these securities	$	-	$	73,014		$	40,578		$	-	$	113,592
Net weighted average borrowing rate		-		0.31	%		0.33	%		-		0.32	%

-12-

Summary information regarding the Company’s amounts at risk with individual counterparties greater than 10% of the Company’s equity at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is as follows:

(in thousands)
	Amount		Weighted Average Maturity of Repurchase
Repurchase Agreement Counterparties	at Risk(1)		Agreements in Days
September 30, 2011
MF Global, Inc.	$	2,278		25
Nomura		1,202		20
December 31, 2010
MF Global, Inc.	$	3,444		25

(1)	Equal to the fair value of securities sold, cash posted as collateral and accrued interest receivable, minus the sum of repurchase agreement liabilities and accrued interest payable.

On October 31, 2011, MF Global Holding Ltd. (“MF”) filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. As of September 30, 2011, a subsidiary of MF, MF Global, Inc., was the Company’s largest repurchase agreement funding provider and the Company had approximately $2.3 million at risk under such agreements. As of November 1, 2011, the Company has no outstanding funding arrangements in place with MF under repurchase agreements. All repurchase agreements in place at September 30, 2011, have been terminated with all pledged assets returned. One reverse-repurchase agreement with MF has yet to be fully unwound and the Company has not received funds in the approximate amount of $343,000. The Company is entitled to the funds and expects to receive them, but given developments at MF it is not known if or when the funds will be received.

NOTE 5. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

In connection with the Company’s interest rate risk management strategy, during the second quarter of 2010, the Company economically hedged a portion of its interest rate risk by entering into derivative financial instrument contracts. The Company did not elect hedging treatment under GAAP, and as such all gains and losses on these instruments are reflected in earnings for all periods presented.

As of September 30, 2011, such instruments are comprised entirely of Eurodollar futures contracts. Eurodollar futures are cash settled futures contracts on an interest rate, with gains and losses credited or charged to the Company’s account on a daily basis. A minimum balance, or “margin”, is required to be maintained in the account on a daily basis. The Company is exposed to the changes in value of the futures by the amount of margin held by the broker. The total amount of margin at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was approximately $446,000 and $224,000, respectively, and is reflected in restricted cash.

The Company’s Eurodollar futures contracts with a notional amount of $21 million are used to attempt to achieve a fixed interest rate related to its junior subordinated notes. The junior subordinated notes had a fixed-rate of interest until December 15, 2010, of 7.86% and thereafter, through maturity in 2035, the rate will float at a spread of 3.50% over the prevailing three-month LIBOR rate. The Eurodollar futures contracts serve to effectively lock in a fixed LIBOR rate for a specified period of time. As of September 30, 2011, the Company has effectively locked in a weighted-average fixed LIBOR rate of 0.81% on the $21 million of its junior subordinated notes through September 2014. The effective interest rate for the junior subordinated notes is 4.31%. For the nine and three months ended September 30, 2011, the Company recorded losses of $746,000 and $471,000, respectively, on Eurodollar futures contracts held as part of its junior subordinated notes hedging strategy, compared to losses of $499,000 and $349,000 for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2010.

-13-

The Company also used Eurodollar futures contracts with a notional amount of $50 million to attempt to achieve a fixed interest rate related to a portion of its repurchase agreement obligations. As of September 30, 2011, the Company has effectively locked in a weighted-average fixed LIBOR rate of 0.70% on $50 million of its repurchase agreement obligations through December 2013. For the nine and three months ended September 30, 2011, the Company recorded losses of $432,000 and $351,000, respectively, on Eurodollar futures contracts held as part of its repurchase agreement hedging strategy.

As discussed in Note 4, in October 2011, MF filed for bankruptcy protection. A subsidiary of MF, MF Global Inc., was the broker for the Company’s Eurodollar based hedging activities for both our repurchase agreement funding arrangements and our trust preferred debt. At September 30, 2011, the Company had Eurodollar contracts with a notional balance of $71 million in place. The Eurodollar futures with MF Global Inc. will remain in place for the time being until they are either terminated or moved to another broker. The Company is required to maintain adequate margin against these positions for the Chicago Mercantile Exchange through our broker, MF Global Inc., in a segregated account. The equity in these positions at November 1, 2011 was approximately $233,000. The Company expects to receive these funds when the positions are closed but given developments at MF, it is not known if or when the funds will be received.

NOTE 6. TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES

During 2005, Bimini Capital sponsored the formation of a statutory trust, known as Bimini Capital Trust II (“BCTII”) of which 100% of the common equity is owned by Bimini Capital. It was formed for the purpose of issuing trust preferred capital securities to third-party investors and investing the proceeds from the sale of such capital securities solely in junior subordinated debt securities of Bimini Capital. The debt securities held by BCTII are the sole assets of BCTII.

As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the outstanding principal balance on the junior subordinated debt securities owed to BCTII was $26.8 million. The BCTII trust preferred securities and Bimini Capital's BCTII Junior Subordinated Notes have a rate of interest that floats at a spread of 3.50% over the prevailing three-month LIBOR rate. As of September 30, 2011, the interest rate was 3.85%. The BCTII trust preferred securities and Bimini Capital's BCTII Junior Subordinated Notes require quarterly interest distributions and are redeemable at Bimini Capital's option, in whole or in part and without penalty, beginning December 15, 2010. Bimini Capital's BCTII Junior Subordinated Notes are subordinate and junior in right of payment of all present and future senior indebtedness.

The trust is a variable interest entity pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 810 because the holders of the equity investment at risk do not have adequate decision making ability over the trust's activities. Since Bimini Capital's investment in the trust's common equity securities was financed directly by the applicable trust as a result of its loan of the proceeds to Bimini Capital, that investment is not considered to be an equity investment at risk. Since Bimini Capital's common share investments in BCTII are not a variable interest, Bimini Capital is not the primary beneficiary of BCTII. Therefore, Bimini Capital has not consolidated the financial statements of BCTII into its financial statements.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements present Bimini Capital's BCTII Junior Subordinated Notes issued to the trust as a liability and Bimini Capital's investment in the common equity securities of BCTII as an asset. For financial statement purposes, Bimini Capital records payments of interest on the Junior Subordinated Notes issued to BCTII as interest expense.

-14-

NOTE 7. CAPITAL STOCK

Issuances of Common Stock

The table below presents information related to Class A Common Stock issued to its independent directors for the payment of director fees and to employees pursuant to the terms of its stock incentive plan grants for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.

	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended September 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Directors' Compensation		188,128		129,301		72,052		48,800
Incentive Plan		13,000		-		-		-
Total shares of Class A Common Stock issued		201,128		129,301		72,052		48,800

There were no issuances of the Company's Class B Common Stock and Class C Common Stock during the nine and three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.

Stock Repurchases

On June 29, 2010, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $1.0 million of the Company’s Class A common stock. Through September 30, 2011, the Company had repurchased 403,715 shares under the plan, for a total of $349,344. As of September 30, 2011 the remaining amount authorized under the plan was $650,656. On August 2, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors suspended future purchases under this plan.

In addition, during 2011, the Company acquired 655 shares of Class A common stock in satisfaction of tax withholding obligations on vested incentive plan shares.

Dividends

The table below presents information related to dividends declared by the Company’s Board of Directors during 2011 and 2010.

(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Declaration Date	Record Date	Payment Date	Per Share Amount		Total
2011
April 1, 2011	April 15, 2011	April 29, 2011	$	0.0325		334
July 12, 2011	July 29, 2011	August 16, 2011		0.0325	$	335
2010
April 1, 2010	April 15, 2010	April 30, 2010	$	0.0300	$	314
June 29, 2010	July 15, 2010	July 30, 2010		0.0300		316
October 4, 2010	October 15, 2010	October 29, 2010		0.0300		315
December 8, 2010	December 23, 2010	December 30, 2010		0.0325		332

-15-

NOTE 8. STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS

On December 18, 2003, Bimini Capital adopted the 2003 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2003 Plan”) to provide Bimini with the flexibility to use stock options and other awards as part of an overall compensation package to provide a means of performance-based compensation to attract and retain qualified personnel. The 2003 Plan was amended and restated in March 2004. Key employees, directors and consultants are eligible to be granted stock options, restricted stock, phantom shares, dividend equivalent rights and other stock-based awards under the 2003 Plan. Subject to adjustment upon certain corporate transactions or events, a maximum of 1,448,050 shares of the Class A Common Stock (but not more than 10% of the Class A Common Stock outstanding on the date of grant) may be subject to stock options, shares of restricted stock, phantom shares and dividend equivalent rights under the 2003 Plan.

Phantom share awards represent a right to receive a share of Bimini's Class A Common Stock. These awards do not have an exercise price and are valued at the fair value of Bimini Capital’s Class A Common Stock at the date of the grant. The grant date value is amortized to compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the respective award. The phantom shares vest, based on the employees’ continuing employment, following a schedule as provided in the individual grant agreements, for periods through March 15, 2015. Compensation expense recognized for phantom shares was approximately $70,000 and $22,000 for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, and $62,000 and $27,000 for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2010. Dividends paid on unsettled awards are charged to stockholders’ equity when declared.

A summary of phantom share activity during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 is presented below:

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011					2010
				Weighted-				Weighted-
				Average				Average
				Grant-Date				Grant-Date
	Shares			Fair Value		Shares		Fair Value
Nonvested, at January 1		401,000		$	1.12		102,000	$	1.58
Granted		-			-		302,000		0.97
Vested		(13,000	)		0.97		-		-
Cancellations		(20,156	)		1.37		-		-
Nonvested, at September 30		367,844		$	1.11		404,000	$	1.12

As of September 30, 2011, there was approximately $262,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested phantom share awards. This cost is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average period of 38.3 months. The intrinsic value of the outstanding phantom shares as of September 30, 2011 and 2010 is $224,000 and $339,000, respectively. All of the remaining outstanding unvested awards at September 30, 2011 were granted with dividend participation rights.

On August 12, 2011, the Company’s shareholders approved the 2011 Long Term Compensation Plan (the “2011 Plan”) to assist the Company in recruiting and retaining employees, directors and other service providers by enabling them to participate in the success of the Company and to associate their interest with those of the Company and its stockholders. The plan is intended to permit the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), stock awards, performance units and other equity-based and incentive awards. The maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the 2011 Plan pursuant to the exercise of options and SARs, the grant of stock awards or other equity-based awards and the settlement of incentive awards and performance units is equal to 4,000,000 shares. As of September 30, 2011, no awards have been made under the 2011 Plan.

-16-

NOTE 9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Outstanding Litigation

The Company is involved in various lawsuits and claims, both actual and potential, including some that it has asserted against others, in which monetary and other damages are sought. These lawsuits and claims relate primarily to contractual disputes arising out of the ordinary course of the Company’s business. The outcome of such lawsuits and claims is inherently unpredictable. However, management believes that, in the aggregate, the outcome of all lawsuits and claims involving the Company will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or liquidity; however, any such outcome may be material to the results of operations of any particular period in which costs, if any, are recognized.

A complaint by a note holder in Preferred Term Securities XX (“PreTSL XX”) was filed on July 16, 2010 in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, against Bimini Capital Management, Inc. (“Bimini”), the Bank of New York Mellon (“BNYM”), PreTSL XX, Ltd. and Hexagon Securities, LLC (“Hexagon”). The complaint, filed by Hildene Capital Management, LLC and Hildene Opportunities Fund, Ltd. (“Hildene”), alleges that Hildene suffered losses as a result of Bimini’s repurchase of all outstanding fixed/floating rate capital securities of Bimini Capital Trust II for less than par value from PreTSL XX in October 2009. Hildene has alleged claims against BNYM for breach of the Indenture, breach of fiduciary duties and breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and claims against Bimini for tortious interference with contract, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment and “rescission/illegality”. Plaintiff also alleges derivative claims brought in the name of Nominal Defendant BNYM. (On May 2, 2011, Hexagon and Nominal Defendant PreTSL XX were voluntarily dismissed without prejudice by Hildene.) On May 23, 2011, Bimini and BNYM moved to dismiss Hildene’s derivative claims, and Bimini also moved to dismiss Hildene’s claim for “rescission/illegality.” On October 19, 2011, PreTSL XX moved to intervene as an additional plaintiff in the action. Bimini denies that the repurchase was improper and intends to defend the suit vigorously.

On June 14, 2007, a complaint was filed in the Circuit Court of the Twelfth Judicial District in and for Manatee County, Florida by Coast Bank of Florida against MortCo seeking monetary damages and specific performance and alleging breach of an alleged oral contract for allegedly failing to convert approximately fifty construction loans to permanent financing. MortCo denies that there was an agreement and has asserted several defenses to Coast's claims. Attempts to mediate this dispute were unsuccessful. The parties are currently conducting discovery, which is set to end on January 7, 2012. A non-jury trial is scheduled to begin on January 17, 2012. MortCo plans to continue to defend this matter vigorously.

On March 2, 2011, Orchid Island TRS, LLC, formerly known as Opteum Financial Services, LLC and presently known as MortCo, LLC (“Opteum Financial”) and Opteum Mortgage Acceptance Corporation (“Opteum Acceptance”) (collectively referred to herein as “Opteum”) received a cover letter dated March 1, 2011 from Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company (“Mass Mutual”) enclosing a draft complaint against Opteum. In summary, Mass Mutual alleges that it purchased residential mortgage-backed securities offered by Opteum in August 2005 and the first quarter of 2006 and that Opteum made false representations and warranties in connection with the sale of the securities in violation of Mass Gen. Laws Ch. 110A § 410(a)(2) (the “Massachusetts Blue Sky Law”). In its cover letter, Mass Mutual claims it is entitled to damages in excess of $25 million. However, no monetary demand is contained within the enclosed draft complaint, and the actual damages Mass Mutual claims to have incurred is uncertain.

Mass Mutual has not filed the complaint or initiated litigation. Pursuant to its request, on March 14, 2011 Mass Mutual and Opteum entered into a Tolling Agreement through June 1, 2011 so that Mass Mutual could address its allegations against Opteum without incurring litigation costs. Mass Mutual has not yet contacted Opteum to schedule such discussions. On August 22, 2011, the parties extended the Tolling Agreement through June 1, 2013.

-17-

Opteum denies Opteum Financial or Opteum Acceptance, individually or collectively, made false representations and warranties in connection with the sale of securities to Mass Mutual. Mass Mutual has taken no action to prosecute its claim against Opteum, and the range of loss or potential loss, if any, cannot reasonably be estimated. Should Mass Mutual initiate litigation, Opteum will defend such litigation vigorously.

Loans Sold to Investors.

Generally, MortCo was not exposed to significant credit risk on its loans sold to investors. In the normal course of business, MortCo provided certain representations and warranties during the sale of mortgage loans which obligated it to repurchase loans which are subsequently unable to be sold through the normal investor channels. The repurchased loans were secured by the related real estate properties, and can usually be sold directly to other permanent investors. There can be no assurance, however, that MortCo will be able to recover the repurchased loan value either through other investor channels or through the assumption of the secured real estate.

MortCo recognized a liability for the estimated fair value of this obligation at the inception of each mortgage loan sale based on the anticipated repurchase levels and historical experience. Changes in this liability for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 are presented below:

(in thousands)
	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011		2010
Balance - Beginning of period	$	5,087	$	5,149
Provision		-		48
Settlements		-		(110	)
Balance - End of Period	$	5,087	$	5,087

NOTE 10. INCOME TAXES

REIT Activities

As a REIT, the Company is not subject to federal income tax on REIT taxable income distributed to its shareholders. REIT taxable income or loss, as generated by Bimini Capital’s qualifying REIT activities, is computed in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code, which is different from the Company’s financial statement net income or loss as computed in accordance with GAAP. Depending on the number and size of the various items or transactions being accounted for differently, the differences between the Company’s REIT taxable income or loss and its financial statement net income or loss can be substantial and each item can affect several years. Based on the results of operations through September 30, 2011, the Company expects to generate a REIT taxable loss for the full year ending December 31, 2011.

As of December 31, 2010, Bimini Capital had approximately $53.4 million of remaining capital loss carryforwards available to offset future capital gains and a REIT tax net operating loss carryforward of approximately $6.0 million that is immediately available to offset future REIT taxable income. The capital loss carryforwards expire in years beginning in 2012 through 2016, and the net operating loss carryforwards expire in years beginning in 2028 through 2031.

-18-

Taxable REIT Subsidiaries

As taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS”), Bimini Advisors and MortCo are tax paying entities for income tax purposes and are taxed separately from Bimini Capital. Therefore, Bimini Advisors and MortCo each separately report an income tax provision or benefit based on their own taxable activities. For the nine and three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the TRSs had no taxable income primarily due to the utilization of NOL carryforwards.

The income tax provisions for the periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 differ from the amount determined by applying the statutory Federal rate of 35% to the pre-tax income or loss due primarily to the recording of, and adjustments to, the deferred tax asset valuation allowance. During the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, and during the three-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, a portion of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance was reversed, as the utilization of this portion of the deferred tax asset was deemed more likely than not, due to the utilization of tax net operating losses to offset estimated taxable income for the respective periods; therefore, there are no income tax provisions related to the results of operations.

As of September 30, 2011, MortCo had an estimated federal tax NOL carryforward of approximately $269.9 million, and estimated available Florida NOLs of approximately $42.9 million, which begin to expire in 2025, and are fully available to offset future taxable income. All other state NOLs have been abandoned. Similar amounts for Bimini Advisors are insignificant.

The net deferred tax assets and offsetting valuation allowances at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were approximately $99.6 million and $101.5 million, respectively. The ultimate realization of the deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income within MortCo. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, management believed that it was more likely than not that the Company will not realize the full benefits of all of the federal and state tax NOL carryforwards, which are the primary deferred tax assets of MortCo; therefore, an allowance for the full amount of the net deferred tax assets has been recorded in both periods. Management considers the projected future taxable income or losses, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment.

NOTE 11. EARNINGS PER SHARE

Shares of Class B Common Stock, participating and convertible into Class A Common Stock, are entitled to receive dividends in an amount equal to the dividends declared on each share of Class A Common Stock if, and when, authorized and declared by the Board of Directors. Following the provisions of FASB ASC 260, the Class B Common Stock is included in the computation of basic EPS using the two-class method, and consequently is presented separately from Class A Common Stock. Shares of Class B Common Stock are not included in the computation of diluted Class A EPS as the conditions for conversion to Class A Common Stock were not met at September 30, 2011 and 2010.

Shares of Class C Common Stock are not included in the basic EPS computation as these shares do not have participation rights. Shares of Class C Common Stock are not included in the computation of diluted Class A EPS as the conditions for conversion to Class A Common Stock were not met at September 30, 2011 and 2010.

The Company has dividend eligible stock incentive plan shares that were outstanding during the nine and three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. The basic and diluted per share computations include these unvested incentive plan shares if there is income available to Class A common shares, as they have dividend participation rights. The stock incentive plan shares have no contractual obligation to share in losses. Since there is no such obligation, the incentive plan shares are not included in the basic and diluted EPS computations when no income is available to Class A Common Stock even though they are considered participating securities.

-19-

The table below reconciles the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted EPS.

(in thousands, except per-share information)
	Nine Months Ended September 30,							Three Months Ended September 30,
		2011			2010			2011			2010
Basic and diluted EPS per Class A common share:
Loss available to Class A common shares:
Basic and diluted		$	(214	)	$	(751	)	$	(1,907	)	$	(114	)
Weighted average common shares:
Class A common shares outstanding at the balance sheet date			9,977			10,075			9,977			10,075
Effect of weighting			(124	)		(536	)		(60	)		(1	)
Weighted average shares-basic and diluted			9,853			9,539			9,917			10,074
Loss per Class A common share:
Basic and diluted		$	(0.02	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.19	)	$	(0.01	)

(in thousands, except per-share information)
	Nine Months Ended September 30,							Three Months Ended September 30,
		2011			2010			2011			2010
Basic and diluted EPS per Class B common share:
(Loss) income available to Class B common shares:
Basic and diluted		$	(1	)	$	(3	)	$	(6	)	$	-
Weighted average common shares:
Class B common shares outstanding at the balance sheet date			32			32			32			32
Effect of weighting			-			-			-			-
Weighted average shares-basic and diluted			32			32			32			32
(Loss) income per Class B common share:
Basic and diluted		$	(0.02	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.19	)	$	(0.01	)

NOTE 12. FAIR VALUE

Authoritative accounting literature establishes a framework for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities and defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) as opposed to the price that would be paid to acquire the asset or received to assume the liability (an entry price). A fair value measure should reflect the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including the assumptions about the risk inherent in a particular valuation technique, the effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset and the risk of nonperformance. Required disclosures include stratification of balance sheet amounts measured at fair value based on inputs the Company uses to derive fair value measurements. These stratifications are:

·	Level 1 valuations, where the valuation is based on quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities traded in active markets (which include exchanges and over-the-counter markets with sufficient volume),

Level 2 valuations, where the valuation is based on quoted market prices for similar instruments traded in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market, and

-20-

Level 3 valuations, where the valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market, but observable based on Company-specific data. These unobservable assumptions reflect the Company’s own estimates for assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques typically include option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques, but may also include the use of market prices of assets or liabilities that are not directly comparable to the subject asset or liability.

Our MBS are valued using Level 2 valuations, and such valuations currently are determined by the Company based on the average of third-party broker quotes and/or by independent pricing sources when available. Because the price estimates may vary, the Company must make certain judgments and assumptions about the appropriate price to use to calculate the fair values. Alternatively, the Company could opt to have the value of all of our positions in MBS determined by either an independent third-party or do so internally.

Mortgage-backed securities, retained interests, Eurodollar futures contracts and mortgage loans held for sale were recorded at fair value on a recurring basis during 2011 and 2010. When determining fair value measurements, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset. When possible, the Company looks to active and observable markets to price identical assets. When identical assets are not traded in active markets, the Company looks to market observable data for similar assets. Fair value measurements for the retained interests are generated by a model that requires management to make a significant number of assumptions.

The following table presents financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

(in thousands)
			Quoted Prices
			in Active		Significant
			Markets for		Other		Significant
			Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	Fair Value		Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Measurements		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
September 30, 2011
Mortgage-backed securities	$	88,197	$	-	$	88,197	$	-
Eurodollar futures contracts		446		446		-		-
Mortgage Loans Held For Sale		40		-		-		40
Retained interests		4,942		-		-		4,942
December 31, 2010
Mortgage-backed securities	$	135,133	$	-	$	135,133	$	-
Eurodollar futures contracts		224		224		-		-
Mortgage Loans Held For Sale		40		-		-		40
Retained interests		3,928		-		-		3,928

-21-

The following table illustrates a rollforward for all assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:

(in thousands)
	2011					2010
	Retained Interests			Mortgage Loans Held For Sale		Retained Interests			Mortgage Loans Held For Sale
Balance, January 1	$	3,928		$	40	$	5,934		$	207
Gain included in earnings		3,892			-		2,896			73
Collections, sale and settlements		(2,878	)		-		(3,356	)		(240	)
Balance, September 30	$	4,942		$	40	$	5,474		$	40

During the nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, there were no transfers of financial assets or liabilities between levels 1, 2 or 3.

NOTE 13. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Frank E. Jaumot is a shareholder in an accounting firm from which the Company receives accounting and tax services. Mr. Jaumot is both a director and a shareholder of Bimini Capital. Professional fees incurred with this firm were $95,000 and $82,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

-22-

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

When used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, in future filings with the SEC or in press releases or other written or oral communications, statements which are not historical in nature, including those containing words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “should,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend” and similar expressions, are intended to identify “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

These forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described or incorporated by reference in “Part II - Item 1A - Risk Factors” of this Form 10-Q. These and other risks, uncertainties and factors, including those described in reports that the Company files from time to time with the Commission, could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and the Company does not undertake, and specifically disclaims, any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of such statements.

The following discussion of the financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report.

INTRODUCTION

As used in this document, references to “Bimini Capital,” the parent company, the registrant, and to real estate investment trust (“REIT”) qualifying activities or the general management of Bimini Capital’s portfolio of MBS refer to “Bimini Capital Management, Inc.” and its wholly-owned qualified REIT subsidiary. Further, references to Bimini Capital’s taxable REIT subsidiaries or non-REIT eligible assets refer to Bimini Advisors, Inc. (“Bimini Advisors”) and to MortCo TRS, LLC (“MortCo”) and its consolidated subsidiaries. MortCo, which was previously named Opteum Financial Services, LLC, (referred to as “OFS”) was renamed Orchid Island TRS, LLC (referred to as “OITRS”) effective July 3, 2007 and then renamed MortCo TRS, LLC effective March 8, 2011. Hereinafter, any historical mention, discussion or references to Opteum Financial Services, LLC, Orchid Island TRS, LLC, OFS or to OITRS (such as in previously filed documents or Exhibits) now means MortCo. References to the “Company” refer to the consolidated entity (the combination of Bimini Capital and its qualified REIT subsidiary, Orchid Island Capital, Inc. (“Orchid”), and Bimini Advisors and MortCo).

Bimini Capital Management, Inc. was formed in September 2003 to invest primarily in but not limited to, residential mortgage related securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association (more commonly known as Fannie Mae), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (more commonly known as Freddie Mac) and the Government National Mortgage Association (more commonly known as Ginnie Mae). Bimini Capital will deploy its capital into two core strategies. The two strategies are a levered MBS portfolio and an unlevered structured MBS portfolio. The leverage applied to the MBS portfolio will typically be less than twelve to one. Bimini Capital manages its portfolio of agency MBS and structured MBS to generate income derived from the net interest margin of its MBS portfolio, levered predominantly under repurchase agreement funding, net of associated hedging costs, and the interest income derived from its unlevered portfolio of structured mortgage-backed securities. Bimini Capital treats its remaining junior subordinated notes as an equity capital equivalent. Bimini Capital is self-managed and self-advised and has elected to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

-23-

On April 18, 2007, the Board of Managers of MortCo, at the recommendation of the Board of Directors of the Company, approved the closure of the wholesale and conduit mortgage loan origination channels. Both channels ceased accepting new applications for mortgage loans on April 20, 2007. On May 7, 2007, MortCo signed a binding agreement, later amended, to sell its retail mortgage loan origination channel to a third party. The transaction closed on June 30, 2007 and MortCo has not operated a mortgage loan origination business since that date. Since the second quarter of 2007, through September 30, 2010, MortCo was reported as a discontinued operation following applicable accounting standards, since most of the remaining assets and liabilities were considered to be contingent and were held by MortCo pursuant to the terms of the disposal of the operations. The disposal of the retained interests asset was not achieved as a result of the lingering effects of the financial market crisis and a significant lack of investor interest in such securities, even though the Company made efforts to market such securities to previously active market participants. Because MortCo continued to hold these net assets, the remnants of the old mortgage banking business were no longer classified as discontinued operations effective October 1, 2010, and the related assets and liabilities previously classified as held for sale were reclassified to held and used for all periods presented.

DIVIDENDS TO STOCKHOLDERS

In order to maintain its qualification as a REIT, Bimini Capital is required (among other provisions) to annually distribute dividends to its stockholders in an amount at least equal to, generally, 90% of Bimini Capital’s REIT taxable income. REIT taxable income is a term that describes Bimini Capital’s operating results calculated in accordance with rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code.

Bimini Capital’s REIT taxable income is computed differently from net income as computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP net income"), as reported in the Company’s accompanying consolidated financial statements. Depending on the number and size of the various items or transactions being accounted for differently, the differences between REIT taxable income and GAAP net income can be substantial and each item can affect several reporting periods. Generally, these items are timing or temporary differences between years; for example, an item that may be a deduction for GAAP net income in the current year may not be a deduction for REIT taxable income until a later year. The most significant differences are as follows: the results of the Company’s taxable REIT subsidiary do not impact REIT taxable income, unrealized gains or losses on the investment securities portfolio do not impact REIT taxable income, and interest income on structured MBS securities is computed differently for REIT taxable income and GAAP.

As a REIT, Bimini Capital may be subject to a federal excise tax if Bimini Capital distributes less than 85% of its taxable income by the end of the calendar year. Accordingly, Bimini Capital’s dividends are based on its taxable income, as determined for federal income tax purposes, as opposed to its net income computed in accordance with GAAP (as reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements).

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company paid distributions of $0.065 per share on a loss of $0.02 per share. These distributions were funded by cash on hand and cash flows generated from the Company’s investment portfolio. While the Company intends to pay quarterly distributions to our stockholders such that substantially all of our REIT taxable income is distributed, it has not established a minimum distribution payout level and the ability to pay distributions may be adversely affected by a variety of factors. All distributions will be made at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors and will depend on the Company’s results of operations, financial conditions, maintenance of REIT status and other factors that may be deemed relevant; therefore, distributions may be reduced or eliminated at any time. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Outlook” below for additional information regarding distributions.

In August 2011, the Company announced that, based on results of operations through June 30, 2011, it would suspend its quarterly dividend until at least early 2012. Based on the results of operations through September 30, 2011, the Company believes that it will generate a REIT taxable loss for the full year and it will not reinstate its quarterly dividend for the balance of 2011. The Company will re-evaluate its dividend payment policy during 2012.

-24-

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Described below are the Company’s results of operations for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to the Company’s results of operations for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2010.

Net Loss Summary

Consolidated net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $0.2 million, or $0.02 basic and diluted loss per share of Class A Common Stock, as compared to consolidated net loss of $0.8 million, or $0.08 basic and diluted loss per share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

Consolidated net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2011 was $1.9 million, or $0.19 basic and diluted loss per share of Class A Common Stock, as compared to consolidated net loss of $0.1 million, or $0.01 basic and diluted loss per share, for the three months ended September 30, 2010.

The components of net loss for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, along with the changes in those components are presented in the table below:

(in thousands)
	Nine Months Ended									Three Months Ended
	September 30,									September 30,
	2011			2010			Change			2011			2010			Change
Net portfolio interest	$	3,835		$	4,779		$	(944	)	$	1,081		$	1,193		$	(112	)
Interest expense on junior subordinated notes		(750	)		(1,650	)		900			(250	)		(550	)		300
Losses on MBS and Eurodollar futures		(1,520	)		(1,785	)		265			(2,801	)		(693	)		(2,108	)
Net portfolio income (deficiency)		1,565			1,344			221			(1,970	)		(50	)		(1,920	)
Other income		3,840			3,105			735			2,436			1,525			911
Expenses		(5,620	)		(5,349	)		(271	)		(2,379	)		(1,719	)		(660	)
Income tax benefit		-			145			(145	)		-			130			(130	)
Net loss	$	(215	)	$	(755	)	$	540		$	(1,913	)	$	(114	)	$	(1,799	)

Net Portfolio Income

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the REIT generated $3.8 million of net portfolio interest income, consisting of $4.0 million of interest income from MBS assets offset by $0.21 million of interest expense on repurchase liabilities. For the comparable period ended September 30, 2010, the REIT generated $4.8 million of net portfolio interest income, consisting of $5.0 million of interest income from MBS assets offset by $0.19 million of interest expense on repurchase liabilities.

During the three months ended September 30, 2011, the REIT generated $1.1 million of net portfolio interest income, consisting of $1.1 million of interest income from MBS assets offset by $0.05 million of interest expense on repurchase liabilities. For the three month period ended September 30, 2010, the REIT generated $1.2 million of net portfolio interest income, consisting of $1.3 million of interest income from MBS assets offset by $0.07 million of interest expense on repurchase liabilities.

-25-

The table below provides information on our portfolio average balances, interest income, yield on assets, average repurchase agreement balances, interest expense, cost of funds, net interest income and net interest rate for each quarter in 2011 and 2010 and for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.

(dollars in thousands)
	Average				Yield on										Net
	MBS				Average			Average				Average			Portfolio		Net
	Securities		Interest		MBS			Repurchase		Interest		Cost of			Interest		Interest
	Held		Income		Securities			Agreements		Expense		Funds			Income		Spread
Three Months Ended,
September 30, 2011	$	101,102	$	1,134		4.48	%	$	79,750	$	53		0.26	%	$	1,081		4.22	%
June 30, 2011		115,521		1,303		4.51	%		93,516		72		0.31	%		1,231		4.20	%
March 31, 2011		126,084		1,610		5.11	%		104,259		87		0.33	%		1,523		4.77	%
December 31, 2010		132,955		1,497		4.51	%		110,433		88		0.32	%		1,409		4.19	%
September 30, 2010		114,165		1,262		4.42	%		89,440		69		0.31	%		1,193		4.11	%
June 30, 2010		99,856		1,810		7.25	%		74,163		53		0.29	%		1,757		6.96	%
March 31, 2010		110,914		1,898		6.85	%		88,495		68		0.31	%		1,830		6.54	%
Nine Months Ended,
September 30, 2011	$	114,236	$	4,047		4.72	%	$	92,509	$	212		0.30	%	$	3,835		4.42	%
September 30, 2010		108,312		4,970		6.12	%		84,033		190		0.30	%		4,780		5.82	%

Portfolio yields and costs of borrowings presented in the table above and the tables on pages 27 and 28 are calculated based on the average balances of the underlying investment portfolio/repurchase agreement balances and are annualized for the quarterly and nine month periods presented. Average balances for quarterly periods are calculated using two data points, the beginning and ending balances. Average balances for the nine month periods are calculated as the average of the average quarterly periods.

Interest Income and Average Earning Asset Yield

Interest income was $4.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and $5.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Average MBS holdings were $114.2 million and $108.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The $1.0 million decrease in interest income was due to a 140 basis point decrease in yields, which was partially offset by a $5.9 million increase in average MBS holdings.

Interest income was $1.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and $1.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. Average MBS holdings were $101.1 million and $114.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The $0.2 million decrease in interest income was due to a $13.1 million decrease in average MBS holdings, which was partially offset by a 6 basis point increase in yields.

-26-

The table below presents the average portfolio, income and yields of our respective sub-portfolios, consisting of structured MBS and PT MBS.

(dollars in thousands)
	Average MBS Held						Interest Income						Realized Yield on Average MBS
	PT		Structured				PT		Structured				PT			Structured
	MBS		MBS		Total		MBS		MBS		Total		MBS			MBS			Total
Three Months Ended,
September 30, 2011	$	83,004	$	18,098	$	101,102	$	589	$	545	$	1,134		2.84	%		12.03	%		4.48	%
June 30, 2011		98,060		17,461		115,521		757		546		1,303		3.09	%		12.52	%		4.51	%
March 31, 2011		108,382		17,702		126,084		929		681		1,610		3.43	%		15.39	%		5.11	%
December 31, 2010		114,570		18,385		132,955		995		502		1,497		3.48	%		10.92	%		4.51	%
September 30, 2010		93,579		20,586		114,165		834		428		1,262		3.56	%		8.31	%		4.42	%
June 30, 2010		79,691		20,165		99,856		763		1,047		1,810		3.83	%		20.76	%		7.25	%
March 31, 2010		94,493		16,421		110,914		1,051		847		1,898		4.45	%		20.64	%		6.85	%
Nine Months Ended,
September 30, 2011	$	96,482	$	17,754	$	114,236	$	2,275	$	1,772	$	4,047		3.14	%		13.31	%		4.72	%
September 30, 2010		89,254		19,058		108,312		2,648		2,322		4,970		3.96	%		16.24	%		6.12	%

Interest Expense on Repurchase Agreements and the Cost of Funds

Average outstanding repurchase agreements were $92.5 million and total interest expense was $0.21 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, average outstanding repurchase agreements were $84.0 million and total interest expense was $0.19 million. Our average cost of funds was 0.30% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010. There was a $0.02 million increase in interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 when compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010. This change was due entirely to a $8.5 million increase in average outstanding repurchase agreements for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 when compared to the same period ended September 30, 2010.

Average outstanding repurchase agreements were $79.8 million and total interest expense was $0.05 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011. During the three months ended September 30, 2010, average outstanding repurchase agreements were $89.4 million and total interest expense was $0.07 million. Our average cost of funds was 0.26% for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 0.31% for the three months ended September 30, 2010. There was a $0.02 million decrease in interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2011 when compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010. This change was due to a 5 basis point decrease in cost of funds and a $9.7 million decrease in average outstanding repurchase agreements for the three months ended September 30, 2011 when compared to the same period ended September 30, 2010.

Since all of our repurchase agreements are short-term, changes in market rates directly affect our interest expense. Our average cost of funds was 5 basis points above average one-month LIBOR and 20 basis points below average six-month LIBOR for the quarter ended September 30, 2011. The average term to maturity of the outstanding repurchase agreements decreased from 28 days at December 31, 2010 to 23 days at September 30, 2011.

The Company has not elected to designate its derivative holdings, specifically, its investment in Eurodollar futures contracts for hedge accounting treatment under the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. Changes in fair value of these investments are presented in a separate line item in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. As such, for financial reporting purposes, interest expense and cost of funds are not impacted by the Company’s investment in Eurodollar futures contracts.

-27-

(dollars in thousands)
														Average			Average
	Average													Cost of Funds			Cost of Funds
	Balance of							Average			Average			Relative to			Relative to
	Repurchase		Interest		Average			One-Month			Six-Month			Average One-			Average Six-
	Agreements		Expense		Cost of Funds			LIBOR			LIBOR			Month LIBOR			Month LIBOR
Three Months Ended,
September 30, 2011	$	79,750	$	53		0.26	%		0.21	%		0.46	%		0.05	%		(0.20	)%
June 30, 2011		93,516		72		0.31	%		0.22	%		0.43	%		0.09	%		(0.12	)%
March 31, 2011		104,259		87		0.33	%		0.26	%		0.46	%		0.07	%		(0.13	)%
December 31, 2010		110,433		88		0.32	%		0.26	%		0.47	%		0.06	%		(0.15	)%
September 30, 2010		89,440		69		0.31	%		0.30	%		0.61	%		0.01	%		(0.30	)%
June 30, 2010		74,163		53		0.29	%		0.29	%		0.58	%		0.00	%		(0.29	)%
March 31, 2010		88,495		68		0.31	%		0.24	%		0.43	%		0.07	%		(0.12	)%
Nine Months Ended,
September 30, 2011	$	92,509	$	212		0.30	%		0.23	%		0.45	%		0.07	%		(0.15	)%
September 30, 2010		84,033		190		0.30	%		0.28	%		0.55	%		0.02	%		(0.25	)%

Junior Subordinated Notes

Interest expense on the Company’s junior subordinated debt securities was $0.75 million and $0.25 million for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared to $1.65 million and $0.55 million for the comparable periods in 2010. The junior subordinated debt securities had a fixed-rate of interest until December 15, 2010, of 7.86% and thereafter, through maturity in 2035, the rate floats at a spread of 3.50% over the prevailing three-month LIBOR rate. As of September 30, 2011, the interest rate was 3.85%. The average rate of interest paid, including the amortization of debt issuance costs, for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2011 was 3.84% and 3.85%, respectively, compared to 8.46% and 8.46%, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2010. Interest expense decreased $0.9 million and $0.3 million for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, when compared to the same periods in 2010 due to the 462 basis point and 461 basis point decreases, respectively in interest rates, and amortization of debt issuance costs during the 2010 period.

Gains and Losses

The table below presents the Company’s gains and losses for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010.

(in thousands)
	Nine Months Ended September 30,									Three Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010			Change			2011			2010			Change
Realized gains on sales of MBS	$	937		$	133		$	804		$	394		$	56		$	338
Fair value adjustments on MBS		(1,280	)		(1,419	)		139			(2,373	)		(400	)		(1,973	)
Total losses on MBS		(343	)		(1,286	)		943			(1,979	)		(344	)		(1,635	)
Losses on Eurodollar futures		(1,178	)		(499	)		(679	)		(822	)		(349	)		(473	)
Gains on residual interests		3,892			2,896			996			2,451			1,528			923

During the nine and three months ended September 30, 2011, the Company received sales proceeds of $73.3 million and $46.6 million, respectively, compared to $92.1 million and $29.8 million for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2010.

-28-

The retained interests in securitizations represent residual interests in loans originated or purchased by MortCo prior to securitization. Fluctuations in value of retained interests are primarily driven by projections of future interest rates (the forward LIBOR curve), the discount rate used to determine the present value of the residual cash flows and prepayment and loss estimates on the underlying mortgage loans.

Operating Expenses

For the nine and three months ended September 30, 2011, Bimini Capital’s total operating expenses were approximately $5.6 million and $2.4 million, respectively, compared to approximately $5.3 million and $1.7 million for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. The table below provides a breakdown of operating expenses for the nine and three month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. During the third quarter of 2011, Orchid withdrew its S-11 Registration Statement related to a proposed public offering of its common stock. The Registration Statement was withdrawn due to several market factors, most significantly the Federal debt ceiling extension crisis that played out in Congress in late July and early August of 2011. Included in other professional fees for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2011 are approximately $1.0 million of expenses related to this attempted public offering.

(in thousands)
	Nine Months Ended September 30,							Three Months Ended September 30,
	2011		2010		Change			2011		2010		Change
Direct REIT operating expenses	$	403	$	445	$	(42	)	$	132	$	148	$	(16	)
Compensation and benefits		1,393		1,477		(84	)		443		458		(15	)
Legal fees		1,161		1,814		(653	)		196		679		(483	)
Accounting, auditing and other professional fees		1,550		419		1,131			1,237		129		1,108
Directors’ fees and liability insurance		453		378		75			150		116		34
Other G&A expenses		660		816		(156	)		221		189		32
	$	5,620	$	5,349		271		$	2,379	$	1,719	$	660

Financial Condition:

Mortgage-Backed Securities

As of September 30, 2011, the MBS portfolio consisted of $88.2 million of agency or government MBS at fair value and had a weighted average coupon on assets of 4.11%. During the nine and three months ended September 30, 2011, we received principal repayments of $19.6 million and $5.9 million, respectively, compared to $26.0 million and $8.5 million, respectively, for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2010. The average prepayment speeds for the quarters ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were 20.9% and 30.6%, respectively. (See table below for additional prepayment data).

The following table presents the CPR experienced on our structured and pass-through (“PT”) MBS sub-portfolios, on an annualized basis, for the quarterly periods presented.


			Structured
	PT MBS Sub-		MBS Sub-		Total
Three Months Ended,	Portfolio		Portfolio		Portfolio
September 30, 2011		13.4		22.8		20.9
June 30, 2011		11.8		13.0		12.7
March 31, 2011		12.0		19.1		17.2
December 31, 2010		11.7		34.5		28.3
September 30, 2010		17.2		35.0		30.6
June 30, 2010		27.8		44.9		42.1
March 31, 2010		9.2		33.3		28.8

-29-

The following tables summarize certain characteristics of the Company’s agency and government mortgage related securities as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

(in thousands)
					Weighted		Weighted
			Percentage		Average		Average	Weighted	Weighted
			of	Weighted	Maturity		Coupon	Average	Average
		Fair	Entire	Average	in	Longest	Reset in	Lifetime	Periodic
Asset Category		Value	Portfolio	Coupon	Months	Maturity	Months	Cap	Cap
September 30, 2011
Adjustable Rate MBS	$	35,528	40.3%	2.59%	258	1-Jan-41	5.02	9.94%	2.00%
Fixed Rate MBS		28,719	32.6%	5.11%	181	1-Nov-40	NA	NA	NA
Hybrid Adjustable Rate MBS		5,149	5.8%	3.85%	359	1-Sep-41	118.03	8.85%	2.00%
Total Mortgage-backed Pass-through		69,396	78.7%	3.73%	234	1-Sep-41	19.33	9.80%	2.00%
Structured MBS		18,801	21.3%	5.51%	300	25-Nov-40	NA	NA	NA
Total Mortgage Assets	$	88,197	100.0%	4.11%	248	1-Sep-41	NA	NA	2.00%
December 31, 2010
Adjustable Rate MBS	$	64,458	47.7%	2.83%	279	1-Jan-41	2.72	10.19%	2.00%
Fixed Rate MBS		50,013	37.0%	4.90%	178	1-Apr-36	NA	NA	NA
Hybrid Adjustable Rate MBS		2,783	2.1%	5.18%	295	1-Aug-35	18.03	10.18%	2.00%
Total Mortgage-backed Pass-through		117,254	86.8%	3.77%	236	1-Jan-41	3.35	10.19%	2.00%
Structured MBS		17,879	13.2%	5.83%	272	16-Nov-39	NA	NA	NA
Total Mortgage Assets	$	135,133	100.0%	4.04%	241	1-Jan-41	3.35	NA	2.00%

(in thousands)
	September 30, 2011					December 31, 2010
			Percentage of					Percentage of
Agency	Fair Value		Entire Portfolio			Fair Value		Entire Portfolio
Fannie Mae	$	60,887		69.03	%	$	103,568		76.64	%
Freddie Mac		27,310		30.97	%		25,710		19.03	%
Ginnie Mae		-		0.00	%		5,855		4.33	%
Total Portfolio	$	88,197		100.00	%	$	135,133		100.0	%

Entire Portfolio	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
Weighted Average Pass Through Purchase Price	$	104.38		$	104.44
Weighted Average Structured Purchase Price	$	5.95		$	5.46
Weighted Average Pass Through Current Price	$	106.47		$	105.29
Weighted Average Structured Current Price	$	6.16		$	5.98
Effective Duration (1)		(5.758	)		1.024

(1) Effective duration of (5.758) indicates that an interest rate increase of 1.0% would be expected to cause a 5.758% increase in the value of the MBS in the Company’s investment portfolio at September 30, 2011. An effective duration of 1.024 indicates that an interest rate increase of 1.0% would be expected to cause a 1.024% decrease in the value of the MBS in the Company’s investment portfolio at December 31, 2010. These figures include the structured securities in the portfolio.

-30-

The following table presents details related to portfolio assets acquired for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.

(in thousands)
	2011								2010
		Total Cost		Average Price		Weighted Average Yield				Total Cost		Average Price		Weighted Average Yield
Pass-through MBS		$	26,631		105.69		1.95	%		$	102,480		105.52		2.31	%
Structured MBS			19,686		11.14		15.91	%			27,936		9.32		22.26	%

The Company’s portfolio of PT MBS will typically be comprised of adjustable-rate MBS, fixed-rate MBS and hybrid adjustable-rate MBS. The Company seeks to acquire low duration assets that offer high levels of protection from mortgage prepayments. Although the duration of an individual asset can change as a result of changes in interest rates, the Company strives to maintain a PT MBS portfolio with an effective duration of less than 2.0. The stated contractual final maturity of the mortgage loans underlying the Company’s portfolio of PT MBS generally ranges up to 30 years. However, the effect of prepayments of the underlying mortgage loans tends to shorten the resulting cash flows from the Company’s investments substantially. Prepayments occur for various reasons, including refinancing of underlying mortgages and loan payoffs in connection with home sales.

The duration of the Company’s interest only (“IO”) and inverse interest only (“IIO”) portfolio will vary greatly owing to the structural features of the securities. While prepayment activity will always affect the cash flows associated with the securities, the interest only nature of IO’s may cause their durations to become extremely negative when prepayments are high, and less negative when prepayments are low. With respect to IIO’s, prepayments affect their durations in a similar fashion to that of IO’s, but the floating rate nature of their coupon (which is inversely related to the level of one month LIBOR) cause their price movements – and model duration - to be affected by changes in both prepayments and one month LIBOR – both current and anticipated levels. As a result, the duration of IIO securities will also vary greatly.

Prepayments on the loans underlying the Company’s MBS can alter the timing of the cash flows from the underlying loans to the Company. As a result, the Company gauges the interest rate sensitivity of its assets by measuring their effective duration. While modified duration measures the price sensitivity of a bond to movements in interest rates, effective duration captures both the movement in interest rates and the fact that cash flows to a mortgage related security are altered when interest rates move. Accordingly, when the contract interest rate on a mortgage loan is substantially above prevailing interest rates in the market, the effective duration of securities collateralized by such loans can be quite low because of expected prepayments. Although some of the fixed-rate MBS in the Company’s portfolio are collateralized by loans with a lower propensity to prepay when the contract rate is above prevailing rates, their price movements track securities with like contract rates and therefore exhibit similar effective duration.

The Company faces the risk that the market value of its assets will increase or decrease at different rates than that of its liabilities, including its hedging instruments. Accordingly, the Company assesses its interest rate risk by estimating the duration of its assets and the duration of its liabilities. The Company generally calculates duration using various third party models. However, empirical results and various third party models may produce different duration numbers for the same securities.

-31-

The following sensitivity analysis shows the estimated impact on the fair value of the Company's interest rate-sensitive investments as of September 30, 2011, assuming rates instantaneously fall 100 basis points (“bps”), rise 100 bps and rise 200 bps:

(in thousands)
			$ Change in Fair Value									% Change in Fair Value
	Fair Value		-100BPS			+100BPS			+200BPS			-100BPS			+100BPS			+200BPS
Adjustable Rate MBS	$	35,528	$	367		$	(367	)	$	(735	)		1.03	%		(1.03	)%		(2.07	)%
Hybrid Adjustable Rate MBS		5,149		62			(62	)		(125	)		1.21	%		(1.21	)%		(2.42	)%
Fixed Rate MBS		28,719		618			(618	)		(1,237	)		2.15	%		(2.15	)%		(4.31	)%
Structured MBS		18,801		(6,126	)		6,126			12,252			(32.58	)%		32.58	%		65.17	%
Portfolio Total	$	88,197	$	(5,079	)	$	5,079		$	10,155			(5.76	)%		5.76	%		11.52	%

The table below reflects the same analysis presented above but with the figures in the columns that indicate the estimated impact of a 100 bps fall or rise adjusted to reflect the impact of convexity.

(in thousands)
			$ Change in Fair Value									% Change in Fair Value
	Fair Value		-100BPS			+100BPS			+200BPS			-100BPS			+100BPS			+200BPS
Adjustable Rate MBS	$	35,528	$	178		$	(462	)	$	(1,113	)		0.50	%		(1.30	)%		(3.13	)%
Hybrid Adjustable Rate MBS		5,149		-			(160	)		(449	)		(0.00	)%		(3.12	)%		(8.71	)%
Fixed Rate MBS		28,719		427			(735	)		(1,684	)		1.49	%		(2.56	)%		(5.87	)%
Structured MBS		18,801		(3,632	)		6,286			10,150			(19.32	)%		33.43	%		53.99	%
Portfolio Total	$	88,197	$	(3,027	)	$	4,929		$	6,904			(3.43	)%		5.59	%		7.83	%

The Company has economically hedged a portion of its interest rate risk by entering into Eurodollar futures contracts. The Company did not elect hedging treatment under the applicable accounting standards, and as such, all gains and losses on these instruments are reflected in earnings. The table below reflects the impact on operations as of September 30, 2011, assuming rates fall 100 bps, rise 100 bps and rise 200 bps:

(in thousands)
	Notional		$ Change in Fair Value							% Change in Fair Value
	Amount		-100BPS			+100BPS		+200BPS		-100BPS			+100BPS			+200BPS
Repurchase Agreement Hedges	$	50,000	$	(584	)	$	925	$	1,850		(1.17	)%		1.85	%		3.70	%
Junior Subordinated Debt Hedges		21,000		(466	)		630		1,260		(2.22	)%		3.00	%		6.00	%
Portfolio Total	$	71,000	$	(1,050	)	$	1,555	$	3,110		(1.48	)%		2.19	%		4.38	%

In addition to changes in interest rates, other factors impact the fair value of Bimini Capital's interest rate-sensitive investments and hedging instruments, such as the shape of the yield curve, market expectations as to future interest rate changes and other market conditions. Accordingly, in the event of changes in actual interest rates, the change in the fair value of Bimini Capital's assets would likely differ from that shown above and such difference might be material and adverse to Bimini Capital's stockholders.

Repurchase Agreements

As of September 30, 2011, the Company had established borrowing facilities in the repurchase agreement market with four counterparties which we believe provide borrowing capacity in excess of our needs. None of these lenders are affiliated with the Company. As of September 30, 2011, we had funding in place with two of those counterparties. These borrowings are secured by the Company’s MBS and bear interest rates that are based on a spread to LIBOR.

-32-

As of September 30, 2011, the Company had obligations outstanding under the net repurchase agreements of approximately $67.4 million with a net weighted average borrowing cost of 0.29%. The remaining maturity of Bimini Capital’s outstanding repurchase agreement obligations ranged from 3 to 38 days, with a weighted average maturity of 23 days. Securing the repurchase agreement obligation as of September 30, 2011, are MBS with an estimated fair value, including accrued interest, of $69.6 million and a weighted average maturity of 234 months. Through November 3, 2011, the Company has been able to maintain its repurchase facilities with its counterparty with comparable terms to those that existed at September 30, 2011 with maturities through January 27, 2012.

MF Global Inc. was also the broker for the Company’s Eurodollar based hedging activities for both our repurchase agreement funding arrangements and our trust preferred debt. At September 30, 2011, the Company had Eurodollar contracts with a notional balance of $71 million in place. The Eurodollar futures with MF Global Inc. will remain in place for the time being until they are either terminated or moved to another broker. The Company is required to maintain adequate margin against these positions for the Chicago Mercantile Exchange through our broker, MF Global Inc., in a segregated account. The equity in these positions at November 1, 2011 was approximately $233,000. The Company expects to receive these funds when the positions are closed but given developments at MF, it is not known if or when the funds will be received.

The table below presents information about our period end and average repurchase agreement obligations for each quarter in 2011 and 2010.

(dollars in thousands)
Three Months Ended,		Ending Balance of Repurchase Agreements		Average Balance of Repurchase Agreements		Difference Between Ending Repurchase Agreements and Average Repurchase Agreements
Three Months Ended,		Ending Balance of Repurchase Agreements		Average Balance of Repurchase Agreements		Amount	Percent
September 30, 2011	$	67,396	$	79,750	$	(12,354)	(15.49)%	(a)
June 30, 2011		92,105		93,516		(1,411)	(1.51)%
March 31, 2011		94,927		104,259		(9,332)	(8.95)%
December 31, 2010		113,592		110,433		3,159	2.86%
September 30, 2010		107,274		89,440		17,834	19.94%	(b)
June 30, 2010		71,606		74,163		(2,557)	(3.45)%
March 31, 2010		76,719		88,495		(11,776)	(13.31)%	(c)

(a) The lower ending balance relative to the average balance reflects a shift in the portfolio allocation towards assets that the Company does not fund through the repo market. During the quarter ended September 30, 2011, the Company’s investment in PT MBS decreased $27.2 million.
(b) The higher ending balance relative to the average balance reflects a shift in the portfolio allocation towards assets that the Company typically finances. During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the investment in PT MBS increased $36.6 million.
(c) The lower ending balance relative to the average balance reflects a shift in the portfolio allocation towards assets that the Company does not fund through the repo market. During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the Company’s investment in PT MBS decreased $20.8 million.

-33-

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is our ability to turn non-cash assets into cash, purchase additional investments, repay principal and interest on borrowings, fund overhead, fulfill margin calls and pay dividends. Our principal immediate sources of liquidity include cash balances, unencumbered assets and borrowings under repurchase agreements. Our borrowing capacity will vary over time as the market value of our interest earning assets varies. Our balance sheet also generates liquidity on an on-going basis through payments of principal and interest we receive on our MBS portfolio, and from cash flows received from the retained interests and the collection of servicing advances. Management believes that we currently have sufficient liquidity and capital resources available for (a) the acquisition of additional investments when considered appropriate, (b) the repayments on borrowings and (c) the payment of dividends to the extent required for Bimini’s continued qualification as a REIT.

Because our PT MBS portfolio consists entirely of government and agency securities, we do not anticipate having difficulty converting our assets to cash should our liquidity needs ever exceed our immediately available sources of cash. Our structured MBS portfolio also consists of entirely governmental agency securities, although they typically do not trade with comparable bid / ask spreads as PT MBS. However, we anticipate that we would be able to liquidate such securities readily, even in distressed markets, albeit with potential haircuts.

Bimini Capital’s master repurchase agreements have no stated expiration, but can be terminated at any time at Bimini Capital’s option or at the option of the counterparty. However, once a definitive repurchase agreement under a master repurchase agreement has been entered into, it generally may not be terminated by either party. A negotiated termination can occur, but may involve a fee to be paid by the party seeking to terminate the repurchase agreement transaction.

At September 30, 2011, the weighted average haircut our repurchase agreement counterparties required us to hold was 5% of the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral.

Under our repurchase agreement funding arrangements we are required to post margin at the initiation of the borrowing. The margin posted represents the haircut, which is a percentage of the market value of the collateral pledged. To the extent the market value of the asset collateralizing the financing transaction declines, the market value of our posted margin will be insufficient and we will be required to post additional collateral. Conversely, if the market value of the asset pledged increases in value, we would be over collateralized and we could then call our repo counterparty and have excess margin returned to us. Our lenders typically value our pledged securities daily to ensure the adequacy of our margin and make margin calls as needed, as do we. Typically, but not always, the parties agree to a minimum threshold amount for margin calls so as to avoid the need for nuisance margin calls on a daily basis.

As a result of losses incurred during and after the period when MortCo operated a mortgage loan origination business, the Company was forced to materially downsize its investment portfolio to raise cash, and was left with a depleted capital base. This period covered the years 2006, 2007 and 2008. One consequence of this development was the Company had progressively less access to funding via repurchase agreements and from fewer counterparties. The Company therefore opted to augment its existing leveraged MBS portfolio with alternative sources of income. The Company developed an alternative investment strategy utilizing structured MBS with comparable borrower and prepayment characteristics to the securities historically held in the portfolio. Such securities are not funded in the repurchase market but instead are purchased directly, thus reducing – but not eliminating - the Company’s reliance on access to repurchase agreement funding. The leverage inherent in the securities replaces the leverage obtained by acquiring PT securities and funding them in the repurchase market. This structured MBS strategy is now a core element of the Company’s overall investment strategy.

-34-

As of September 30, 2011, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $3.9 million. We generated cash flows of $23.7 million from principal and interest payments on our MBS portfolio and $2.9 million from retained interests. The table below summarizes the effect on our liquidity and cash flows from certain contractual obligations as of September 30, 2011.

(in thousands)
	Obligations Maturing
	Within One Year		One to Three Years		Three to Five Years		More than Five Years		Total
Repurchase agreements	$	67,396	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	67,396
Interest expense on repurchase agreements(1)		42		-		-		-		42
Junior subordinated notes(2)		-		-		-		26,000		26,000
Interest expense on junior subordinated notes(1)		1,042		2,000		2,000		19,566		24,608
Totals	$	68,480	$	2,000	$	2,000	$	45,566	$	118,046

(1) Interest expense on repurchase agreements and junior subordinated notes are based on current interest rates as of September 30, 2011 and the remaining term of liabilities existing at that date.

(2) The Company holds a common equity interest in Bimini Capital Trust II. The amount presented represents the net cash outlay of the Company.

In October 2005, Bimini Capital completed a private offering of $51.5 million of trust preferred securities of Bimini Capital Trust II (“BCTII”) resulting in the issuance by Bimini Capital of an additional $51.5 million of junior subordinated notes. On October 21, 2009, the Company purchased $24 million of trust preferred capital securities issued by BCT II. The total cost for the transaction, including fees was approximately $14.5 million. The Company cancelled the trust preferred capital securities and the $24.74 million of its junior subordinated notes issued to BCT II. As of September 30, 2011, $26.8 million of the trust preferred securities of BCT II remain outstanding.

Outlook

The current growth rate of the U.S. economy has not been sufficient to allow the Federal Reserve to remove accommodations made available to the economy, namely low levels of the Federal Funds rate. This directly impacts the funding levels available to the Company. The low funding rate levels have enabled the Company to continue to generate net interest margins (“NIM”) above our historical average.

Nonetheless, the reduced size of the portfolio in relation to the Company’s operating expenses will constrain the earnings potential of the Company until assets under management can be increased. Given the reduced size of our portfolio, even with the benefit of its alternative investment strategy, no assurance can be made of the Company’s ability to generate sufficient net interest income to cover all of its costs. The Company’s ability to generate sufficient net interest income to cover its fixed and variable operating costs will also be impacted by funding costs, which in turn will depend on how long funding rates will remain at current low levels.

Based on the results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company estimates that it will generate a REIT taxable loss for the full year ending December 31, 2011. (As more fully described in footnote 10 to the accompanying financial statements, REIT taxable income or loss generated by qualifying REIT activities is computed in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code, which is different from the Company’s financial statement income or loss as computed in accordance with GAAP.) In addition, the Company presently has tax net operating loss carryovers of approximately $6.0 million as of December 31, 2010 which are available to offset REIT taxable income. If a REIT taxable loss is incurred for 2011, then distributions in the amount of $0.065 per share already paid to shareholders during 2011 will be considered a return-of-capital, which depletes the Company’s capital base. Distributions made by the Company during 2010 were also a return-of-capital.

-35-

Based on the factors described above, and in order to preserve its capital base, the Company opted to terminate its stock repurchase plan in August 2011 and, for the foreseeable future, suspend its quarterly distribution to stockholders. The Company will reevaluate its ability to resume distributions in 2012.

Critical Accounting Policies

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based on the amounts reported in our financial statements. These financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the Company’s accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.

GAAP requires the Company’s management to make various judgments, estimates and assumptions. Changes in these estimates and assumptions could have a material effect on our financial statements.

In managing our portfolio, the Company employs the following four-step process at each valuation date to determine the fair value of our MBS:

First, the Company obtains fair values from a subscription-based independent pricing source through our repurchase agreement funding services provider. These prices are used by both the Company as well as our repurchase agreement counterparty on a daily basis to establish margin requirements for our borrowings. As of June 30, 2011, the Company subscribed to a second subscription-based pricing service.

Second, the Company requests non-binding quotes from one to four broker-dealers for each of its MBS in order to validate the values obtained by the pricing service. The Company requests these quotes from broker-dealers that actively trade and make markets in the respective asset class for which the quote is requested.

·	Third, the Company reviews the values obtained by the pricing source and the broker-dealers for consistency across similar assets.

Finally, if the data from the pricing services and broker-dealers is not homogenous or if the data obtained is inconsistent with management’s market observations, the Company makes a judgment to determine which price appears the most consistent with observed prices from similar assets and selects that price. To the extent management believes that none of the prices are consistent with observed prices for similar assets, which is typically the case for only an immaterial portion of our portfolio each quarter, the Company may use a third price that is consistent with observed prices for identical or similar assets. In the case of assets that have quoted prices such as Agency MBS backed by fixed-rate mortgages, the Company generally uses the quoted or observed market price. For assets such as Agency MBS backed by ARMs or structured Agency MBS, the Company may determine the price based on the yield or spread that is identical to an observed transaction or a similar asset for which a dealer mark or subscription-based price has been obtained.

There have been no changes to our accounting policies as discussed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

-36-

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Not Applicable.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report (the “evaluation date”), the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“the CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“the CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as designed and implemented, were effective as of the evaluation date (1) in ensuring that information regarding the Company and its subsidiaries is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, by our employees, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and (2) in providing reasonable assurance that information the Company must disclose in its periodic reports under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods prescribed by the SEC’s rules and forms.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

There were no significant changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

We are involved in various lawsuits and claims, both actual and potential, including some that we have asserted against others, in which monetary and other damages are sought. Except as described below, these lawsuits and claims relate primarily to contractual disputes arising out of the ordinary course of our business. The outcome of such lawsuits and claims is inherently unpredictable. However, we believe that, in the aggregate, the outcome of all lawsuits and claims involving us will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position or liquidity; however, any such outcome may be material to the results of operations of any particular quarterly reporting period in which costs, if any, are recognized. See also Note 9 to our accompanying consolidated financial statements.

-37-

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the risk factor discussed below, as well as the factors discussed in Part I, "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The materialization of any risks and uncertainties identified in our forward looking statements contained in this report together with those previously disclosed in the Form 10-K or those that are presently unforeseen could result in significant adverse effects on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

-38-

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS

No assurance can be given that the Securities and Exchange Commission will not alter or eliminate the exemption available to the Company under Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act of 1940. Should the exemption be eliminated, the Company’s use of leverage would be limited to 50% of net assets. The Company currently generates a material portion of its net interest income from the application of leverage through repurchase agreement funding to its pass-through sub-portfolio. Should the exemption be withdrawn, the Company’s ability to generate sufficient net interest income to cover its expenses would be impaired.

On August 31, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued a Concept release (File No. S7-34-11) regarding Companies Engaged in the Business of Acquiring Mortgages and Mortgage-Related Instruments. The SEC has requested public comment on the exemption from the definition of “investment company” contained in Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act of 1940. The Company relies on this exemption in order to apply leverage via repurchase agreement funding to its sub-portfolio of pass-through securities. The net interest income generated by the levered pass-through sub-portfolio is a material component of the Company’s strategy of generating net interest income to cover its expenses and generate dividends for its shareholders. The SEC release was published in early September 2011, and public comments are due on November 7, 2011. The SEC will then consider what changes or clarifications, if any, should be made to the exemption under the Investment Company Act of 1940. At this time the Company is unable to determine what changes to the exemption, if any, will be made, and if changes to the exemption do occur, what impact will it have of the Company’s results of operations.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

During the three months ended September 30, 2011, the Company issued 41,072 and 30,980 shares of Class A Common Stock to Robert J. Dwyer and Frank E. Jaumot, respectively, in consideration for their service on the Company’s Board of Directors and on certain committees of the Board of Directors. The shares were issued pursuant to the exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, contained in Section 4(2) thereof.

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

The Company did not repurchase any shares of its stock during the three months ended September 30, 2011.

-39-

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.

Exhibit No.

3.1	Articles of Amendment and Restatement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form S-11/A, filed with the SEC on April 29, 2004
3.2	Articles Supplementary, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated November 3, 2005, filed with the SEC on November 8, 2005
3.3	Articles of Amendment, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated February 10, 2006, filed with the SEC on February 15, 2006
3.4	Articles of Amendment, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated September 24, 2007, filed with the SEC on September 24, 2007
3.5	Certificate of Notice, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated January 28, 2008, filed with the SEC on February 1, 2008
3.6	Articles of Amendment, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated May 27, 2008, filed with the SEC on May 29, 2008
3.7	Amended and Restated Bylaws, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated September 24, 2007, filed with the SEC on September 24, 2007
3.8	Articles Supplementary, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated January 19, 2010, filed with the SEC on January 22, 2010
3.9	Articles of Amendment, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated February 17, 2010, filed with the SEC on February 17, 2010
3.10	Articles of Amendment, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated February 17, 2010, filed with the SEC on February 17, 2010
3.11	Articles Supplementary, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated February 17, 2010, filed with the SEC on February 17, 2010
†10.1	Bimini Capital Management, Inc. 2003 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended September 28, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, filed with the SEC on November 8, 2007
†10.2	Bimini Capital Management, Inc. 2004 Performance Bonus Plan, as amended September 28, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, filed with the SEC on November 8, 2007
†10.3	Form of Phantom Share Award Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, filed with the SEC on November 8, 2007
†10.4	Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, filed with the SEC on November 8, 2007
†10.5	Separation Agreement and General Release, dated as of June 29, 2007, by and among Opteum Inc., Opteum Financial Services, LLC and Peter R. Norden, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated June 30, 2007, filed with the SEC on July 5, 2007
†10.6	Separation Agreement and General Release by and between Bimini Capital Management, Inc. and Jeffrey J. Zimmer, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated April 14, 2008, filed with the SEC on April 16, 2008
†10.7	Retention and Severance Agreement between Bimini Capital Management, Inc. and G. Hunter Haas, IV, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated April 18, 2008, filed with the SEC on April 18, 2008
†10.8	Retention and Severance Agreement between Bimini Capital Management, Inc. and J. Christopher Clifton, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated April 18, 2008, filed with the SEC on April 18, 2008
†10.9	Employment Agreement dated as of April 27, 2006, by and between Opteum Inc. and J. Christopher Clifton, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, dated August 11, 2008, filed with the SEC on August 11, 2008
†10.10	Agreement dated as of June 30, 2009, by and between Bimini Capital Management, Inc. and Robert E. Cauley, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated June 30, 2009, filed with the SEC on July 2, 2009
†10.11	Agreement dated as of June 30, 2009, by and between Bimini Capital Management, Inc. and G. Hunter Haas, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated June 30, 2009, filed with the SEC on July 2, 2009

-40-

10.13	Membership Interest Purchase, Option and Investor Rights Agreement among Opteum Inc., Opteum Financial Services, LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. dated as of December 21, 2006, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated December 21, 2006, filed with the SEC on December 21, 2006
10.14	Seventh Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Orchid Island TRS, LLC, dated as of July 20, 2007, made and entered into by Opteum Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, filed with the SEC on August 14, 2007
10.15	Asset Purchase Agreement, dated May 7, 2007, by and among Opteum Financial Services, LLC, Opteum Inc. and Prospect Mortgage Company, LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated May 7, 2007, filed with the SEC on May 7, 2007
10.16	First Amendment to Purchase Agreement, dated June 30, 2007, by and among Metrocities Mortgage, LLC – Opteum Division, Opteum Financial Services, LLC and Opteum Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated June 30, 2007, filed with the SEC on July 5, 2007
10.17	Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, dated May 27, 2008, by and among Bimini Capital Management, Inc., Orchid Island TRS, LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated May 27, 2008, filed with the SEC on May 29, 2008
10.18	Eighth Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company of Orchid Island TRS, LLC, dated as of May 27, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated May 27, 2008, filed with the SEC on May 29, 2008
10.19	Amended and Restated Junior Subordinated Indenture, dated as of September 26, 2005, between the Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as trustee.
10.20	Second Amended and Restated Trust Agreement, dated as of September 26, 2005, among the Company, as depositor, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as property trustee, Chase Bank USA, National Association, as Delaware trustee and the Administrative Trustees named therein.
10.21	Indenture, dated as of October 5, 2005, between the Company and Wilmington Trust Company, as debenture trustee.
10.22	Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, dated as of October 5, 2005, by and among Wilmington Trust Company, as Delaware trustee, Wilmington Trust Company, as institutional trustee, the Company, as sponsor, and Jeffrey J. Zimmer, Robert E. Cauley and Amber K. Luedke, as administrators.
*31.1	Certification of the Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
*31.2	Certification of the Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
*32.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
*32.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
	* Filed herewith. † Management compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

-41-

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

BIMINI CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.

Date: November 3, 2011		By:	/s/ Robert E. Cauley
			Robert E. Cauley Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 3, 2011		By:	/s/ G. Hunter Haas
			G. Hunter Haas IV President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Investment Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)