FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-50670
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
52-2230784 |
(State of incorporation)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
140 Broadway, 42nd Floor New York, New York
|
|
10005 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(212) 813-6000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ
No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated Filer þ Non-accelerated filer o
Indicated by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
At August 2, 2006, the number of shares of the Registrants voting common stock outstanding
was 28,463,059 and the number of shares of the Registrants non-voting common shares was 3,550,696.
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC.
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2006
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except |
|
|
|
share and per share |
|
|
|
amounts) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
51,291 |
|
|
$ |
58,189 |
|
Securities and cash provided as collateral |
|
|
3,799 |
|
|
|
3,799 |
|
Securities available-for-sale |
|
|
64,896 |
|
|
|
59,956 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $426 and $438 as of June
30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, including receivables from related
parties of $7,980 and $6,751, respectively |
|
|
16,893 |
|
|
|
14,796 |
|
Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, net of accumulated
depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,931 |
|
|
|
4,643 |
|
Software development costs, net of amortization |
|
|
6,623 |
|
|
|
6,199 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
2,871 |
|
Deferred tax assets, net |
|
|
39,596 |
|
|
|
39,804 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
189,430 |
|
|
$ |
190,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued employee compensation |
|
$ |
5,751 |
|
|
$ |
11,848 |
|
Deferred license revenue |
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
926 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities,
including payables to a related party of $39 and $88 as of
June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively |
|
|
5,738 |
|
|
|
6,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
11,954 |
|
|
|
19,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized
as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, 0 issued and
outstanding in 2006 and 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock voting, $0.003 par value, 110,000,000 shares
authorized as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005,
26,697,829 shares issued and outstanding in 2006 and
25,305,951 shares issued and outstanding in 2005 |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
Common stock non voting, $0.003 par value, 10,000,000
authorized as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005,
3,976,013 shares issued and outstanding in 2006 and 4,401,330
issued and outstanding in 2005 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Warrants, 3,674,400 authorized and outstanding in 2006 and 2005 |
|
|
17,693 |
|
|
|
17,693 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
251,981 |
|
|
|
249,122 |
|
Unearned compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,021 |
) |
Receivable for common stock subscribed |
|
|
(1,042 |
) |
|
|
(1,042 |
) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(90,609 |
) |
|
|
(92,495 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(639 |
) |
|
|
(482 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
177,476 |
|
|
|
170,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
189,430 |
|
|
$ |
190,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts) |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. high-grade, including $5,417,
$6,499, $10,970 and $13,639 from
related parties for the three months
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, and for
the six months ended June 30, 2006 and
2005, respectively |
|
$ |
10,975 |
|
|
$ |
11,562 |
|
|
$ |
22,004 |
|
|
$ |
24,080 |
|
European high-grade, including $1,778,
$1,776, $3,694 and $4,162 from related
parties for the three months ended June
30, 2006 and 2005, and for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively |
|
|
4,089 |
|
|
|
3,336 |
|
|
|
8,427 |
|
|
|
7,737 |
|
Other, including $1,447, $1,342, $2,835
and $2,507 from related parties for the
three months ended June 30, 2006 and
2005, and for the six months ended June
30, 2006 and 2005, respectively |
|
|
2,194 |
|
|
|
1,828 |
|
|
|
4,314 |
|
|
|
3,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commissions |
|
|
17,258 |
|
|
|
16,726 |
|
|
|
34,745 |
|
|
|
35,379 |
|
Information and user access fees,
including $338, $227, $608 and $439
from related parties for the three
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005,
and for the six months ended June 30,
2006 and 2005, respectively |
|
|
1,323 |
|
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
|
2,682 |
|
|
|
2,039 |
|
License fees |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
1,271 |
|
Investment income, including $279,
$180, $453 and $381 from related
parties for the three months ended June
30, 2006 and 2005, and for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively |
|
|
1,084 |
|
|
|
777 |
|
|
|
2,046 |
|
|
|
1,377 |
|
Other, including $130, $170, $264 and
$272 from related parties for the three
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005,
and for the six months ended June 30,
2006 and 2005, respectively |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
20,122 |
|
|
|
19,282 |
|
|
|
40,462 |
|
|
|
40,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation and benefits |
|
|
10,498 |
|
|
|
8,673 |
|
|
|
20,781 |
|
|
|
17,917 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,637 |
|
|
|
1,424 |
|
|
|
3,322 |
|
|
|
2,649 |
|
Technology and communications |
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
|
1,823 |
|
|
|
3,843 |
|
|
|
3,448 |
|
Professional and consulting fees |
|
|
2,488 |
|
|
|
2,735 |
|
|
|
5,039 |
|
|
|
4,629 |
|
Marketing and advertising |
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
1,282 |
|
Moneyline revenue share to related party |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
General and administrative, including
$17, $13, $32 and $21 to related
parties for the three months ended June
30, 2006 and 2005, and for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively |
|
|
1,845 |
|
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
3,837 |
|
|
|
2,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
18,736 |
|
|
|
16,467 |
|
|
|
37,677 |
|
|
|
32,402 |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
1,386 |
|
|
|
2,815 |
|
|
|
2,785 |
|
|
|
8,188 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
991 |
|
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
3,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
800 |
|
|
$ |
1,824 |
|
|
$ |
1,886 |
|
|
$ |
4,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
Weighted average shares used to compute net
income per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
29,837,704 |
|
|
|
27,727,594 |
|
|
|
29,751,787 |
|
|
|
27,577,551 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
34,944,312 |
|
|
|
35,424,799 |
|
|
|
35,146,052 |
|
|
|
35,453,881 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Non |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Unearned |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Stockholders' |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Voting |
|
|
Voting |
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Subscribed |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
17,693 |
|
|
$ |
249,122 |
|
|
$ |
(2,021 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,042 |
) |
|
$ |
(92,495 |
) |
|
$ |
(482 |
) |
|
$ |
170,864 |
|
Issuance of voting
common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,055 |
|
Conversion from
Non-Voting to
Voting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense
related to stock options issuance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,859 |
|
Reclassification of
Unearned
compensation
related to
implementation of
SFAS123R |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,021 |
) |
|
|
2,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense
related to
restricted stock
issuance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,224 |
|
Other comprehensive
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
|
(157 |
) |
Non-employee stock
options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179 |
|
Excess tax benefit from
share based
compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
566 |
|
Net income for the six
months ended
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
17,693 |
|
|
$ |
251,981 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,042 |
) |
|
$ |
(90,609 |
) |
|
$ |
(639 |
) |
|
$ |
177,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,886 |
|
|
$ |
4,881 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
3,322 |
|
|
|
2,649 |
|
Amortization of earned compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
306 |
|
Issuance of stock options to non-employees |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Compensation expense related to stock option and restricted stock
issuance |
|
|
3,081 |
|
|
|
760 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
3,029 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) in accounts receivable, including increases of $1,230
and $1,247 from related parties for the six months ended June
30, 2006 and 2005, respectively |
|
|
(2,152 |
) |
|
|
(1,570 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses |
|
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
(1,119 |
) |
(Decrease) in accrued employee compensation |
|
|
(6,097 |
) |
|
|
(5,873 |
) |
(Decrease) in deferred license revenue |
|
|
(461 |
) |
|
|
(1,218 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued expenses and
other liabilities, including (decreases) increases of $(49) and
$0 from related parties for the six months ended June 30, 2006
and 2005, |
|
|
(1,084 |
) |
|
|
1,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
3,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,797 |
|
Securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales |
|
|
39,590 |
|
|
|
17,000 |
|
Purchases |
|
|
(44,537 |
) |
|
|
(82,195 |
) |
Securities held to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,463 |
|
Purchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,438 |
) |
Securities and cash provided as collateral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Purchase of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements |
|
|
(1,865 |
) |
|
|
(350 |
) |
Capitalization of software development costs |
|
|
(2,168 |
) |
|
|
(1,346 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(8,980 |
) |
|
|
(65,068 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds received from the exercise of stock options |
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
|
1,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
1,620 |
|
|
|
1,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease for the period |
|
|
(6,898 |
) |
|
|
(60,022 |
) |
Beginning of period |
|
|
58,189 |
|
|
|
97,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
51,291 |
|
|
$ |
37,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
$ |
215 |
|
Non-cash activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset related to unrealized losses on Securities-available-for-sale and
Foreign exchange |
|
$ |
212 |
|
|
$ |
65 |
|
Issuance of common stock to employees |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,765 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
1. Organization and Principal Business Activity
MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (the Company) was incorporated in the State of Delaware on April
11, 2000. Through its subsidiaries, the Company operates an electronic, multi-dealer platform for
the trading of corporate bonds and certain other types of fixed-income securities. The Company
offers its clients the ability to trade U.S. high-grade corporate bonds, European high-grade
corporate bonds, emerging markets bonds, including both investment-grade and non-investment grade
debt, as well as crossover and high-yield bonds, agency bonds, new issues and credit default swap
indices. The Companys broker-dealer clients are: ABN Amro, Banc of America Securities, Barclays,
Bear Stearns, BNP Paribas, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, Dresdner Bank AG, DZ Bank AG,
First Tennessee National, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, ING Financial Markets, JPMorgan, Jefferies &
Company, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, Royal Bank of Canada, The Royal Bank of
Scotland, Santander Investment Securities, Société Générale, UBS and Wachovia.
The Companys stockholder broker-dealer clients as of January 1, 2006 included ABN Amro, Banc
of America Securities, Bear Stearns, BNP Paribas, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan, Lehman
Brothers and UBS. All of these broker-dealer clients constitute related parties of the Company
(together, the Stockholder Broker-Dealer Clients). Moneyline Telerate (Moneyline), which
provided certain software development services to the Company and had a revenue-sharing agreement
with the Company, is considered a related party for the fiscal year 2005. In February 2005, the
Company ceased using the technology platform that was covered under the Moneyline revenue-sharing
agreement.
The Companys U.S. subsidiary, MarketAxess Corporation, is a registered broker-dealer with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and is a member of the National Association of
Securities Dealers, Inc. (NASD). The Company also has three international subsidiaries:
MarketAxess Europe Limited (MarketAxess Europe), which is registered as an Alternative Trading
System dealer with the Financial Services Authority (FSA) in the United Kingdom (U.K.);
MarketAxess Leasing Limited (collectively with MarketAxess Europe, the U.K. Subsidiaries); and
MarketAxess Canada Limited, a Canadian subsidiary that the Company incorporated in May 2003.
MarketAxess Canada Limited has applied for registration as an Alternative Trading System dealer
under the Securities Act of Ontario and is in the process of seeking approval for membership with
the Investment Dealers Association of Canada.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
subsidiaries, MarketAxess Corporation, MarketAxess Europe, MarketAxess Leasing Limited and
MarketAxess Canada Limited. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2006 and
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 and notes thereto are prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In the
opinion of management, they reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the Companys
financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results expected for the full year or for any future period.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X of the federal securities laws; however, in the opinion of management, the
accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include all adjustments, consisting only of normal
recurring adjustments, necessary and present fairly the financial position of MarketAxess Holdings
Inc., the results of its operations and its cash flows for the periods indicated. This report
should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and footnotes therein
included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash maintained at U.S. and U.K banks and in money market
funds. The Company defines cash equivalents as short-term interest-bearing investments with
maturities at the time of purchase of three months or less.
7
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Securities Available-for-Sale
The Company has classified certain of its marketable securities as available-for-sale
securities. Unrealized marketable securities gains and losses are reflected as a net amount in
Accumulated other comprehensive loss on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
Realized gains and losses are recorded on the Consolidated Statements of Operations in Other income
or expense. For the purpose of computing realized gains and losses, cost is on a specific
identification basis.
The Company assesses whether an other-than-temporary impairment loss on securities has
occurred due to declines in fair value or other market conditions. Declines in fair value that are
considered other than temporary are recorded as charges in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
Depreciation and Amortization
Fixed assets are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. The Company uses the
straight-line method of depreciation over three years.
Leasehold improvements are stated at cost and are amortized using the straight-line method
over the lesser of the life of the improvement or the remaining term of the lease.
Software Development Costs
In accordance with Statement of Position (SOP) No. 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of
Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use, the Company capitalizes certain costs
associated with the development of internal use software at the point at which the conceptual
formulation, design and testing of possible software project alternatives have been completed. The
Company capitalizes employee compensation and related benefits incurred during the preliminary
software project stage. Once the product is ready for its intended use, such costs are amortized on
a straight-line basis over three years. The Company reviews the amounts capitalized for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of the assets may
not be recoverable.
Stock-Based Compensation for Employees
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock-based employee compensation plans in
accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees (APB 25), as permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123). In accordance with APB No. 25, the Company
accounted for stock-based awards to employees and directors using the intrinsic value method.
Therefore, no stock-based employee compensation cost was recognized in the Consolidated Statements
of Operations.
On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R), which is a revision of SFAS 123.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS 123R, which requires the measurement and
recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees based on
estimated fair values. In accordance with SFAS 123R, non-employee members of the Board of Directors
are treated as employees. SFAS 123R, supersedes the Companys previous accounting under APB 25 for
periods beginning in fiscal 2006. In March 2005, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission issued
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107) relating to SFAS 123R. The Company has applied the
provisions of SAB 107 in its adoption of SFAS 123R.
The Company adopted SFAS 123R using the modified prospective transition method, which requires
the application of the accounting standard as of January 1, 2006. The Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 reflect the impact
of SFAS 123R. In accordance with the modified prospective transition method, the Companys
Consolidated Financial Statements for prior periods have not been restated to reflect, and do not
include, the impact of SFAS 123R. Stock-based compensation expense recognized under SFAS 123R for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was $786 and $1,525, respectively, which consisted of
stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock options.
8
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
SFAS 123R requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards on the
date of grant using an option-pricing model. Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the
Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006
included compensation expense for share-based payment awards granted prior to, but not yet vested
as of, December 31, 2005 based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the pro
forma provisions of SFAS 123 and compensation expense for the share-based payment awards granted
subsequent to December 31, 2005 based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the
provisions of SFAS 123R. As stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 is based on awards
ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS 123R requires
forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods
if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. In the Companys pro forma information required
under SFAS 123 for the periods prior to fiscal 2006, the Company accounted for forfeitures as they
occurred.
On November 10, 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 123R-3, Transition Election
Related to Accounting for Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards. The alternative transition
method includes simplified methods to establish the beginning balance of the additional paid-in
capital pool (APIC pool) related to the tax effects of employee stock-based compensation, and to
determine the subsequent impact on the APIC pool and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows of the
tax effects of employee stock-based compensation awards that are outstanding upon the adoption of
SFAS 123R. The Company has used the long-method calculation, pursuant to SFAS 123R, to determine
its APIC pool as of December 31, 2005. As of June 30, 2006, the Company has calculated the APIC
pool to be $0.6 million.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company presented all tax benefits of deductions
resulting from the exercise of stock options as operating cash flows in the Consolidated Statements
of Cash Flows. SFAS 123R requires the cash flows resulting from the tax benefits resulting from tax
deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those options (excess tax benefits) to
be classified as financing cash flows. The excess tax benefit for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2006 of $614 and $566, respectively, classified as a financing cash flow, would have been
classified as an operating cash flow if the Company had not adopted SFAS 123R.
Had compensation expense for the Companys plans been determined based on the fair value at
the grant dates for awards to employees under the plans, consistent with SFAS No. 123R, the
Companys Net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 would have been decreased to
the pro forma amounts indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
1,824 |
|
|
$ |
4,881 |
|
Compensation expense, after related tax effects |
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
(466 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
1,613 |
|
|
$ |
4,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
Diluted net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
Basic net income per common share pro forma |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
Diluted net income per common share pro forma |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
In calculating the fair market value of the options granted, the following assumptions were used:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Market Value of Common Stock |
|
$ |
14.37 |
|
|
$ |
14.06 |
|
Dividend Yield |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Weighted-Average Expected Life (years) |
|
|
3.00 |
|
|
|
3.00 |
|
Weighted-Average Risk-Free Interest Rate |
|
|
3.70 |
% |
|
|
3.69 |
% |
Weighted-Average Expected Volatility |
|
|
22.27 |
% |
|
|
19.97 |
% |
9
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Revenue Recognition
The majority of our revenues are derived from commissions for trades executed on our platform
that are billed to our broker-dealer clients on a monthly basis. We also derive revenues from
information and user access fees, license fees and other income.
Commissions are generally calculated as a percentage of notional dollar volume of bonds traded
on the platform and vary based on the type and maturity of the bond traded. Under our transaction
fee plans, bonds that are more actively traded or that have shorter maturities are generally
charged lower commissions, while bonds that are less actively traded or that have longer maturities
generally command higher commissions.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method in accordance with SFAS
No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS No. 109). Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax
effects of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and
liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when such
differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change
in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation
allowance is recognized against deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that such assets
will not be realized in future years.
Earnings Per Share
SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share, requires the presentation of basic and diluted earnings
per share (EPS) in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Basic EPS is computed by dividing
the net income attributable to common stock by the weighted-average number of shares of common
stock outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is computed using the same method as basic EPS, but
in the denominator, shares of common stock outstanding reflect the potential dilution that could
occur if convertible securities or other contracts to issue common stock were converted into or
exercised for common stock.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial
Instruments (SFAS 155). SFAS 155 is an amendment of SFAS No. 133 and SFAS No. 140. SFAS No. 155
permits companies to elect, on a deal-by-deal basis, to apply a fair value remeasurement for any
hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require
bifurcation. SFAS No. 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the
beginning of an entitys first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. The Company does
not expect SFAS No. 155 to have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets
(SFAS 156). SFAS 156 amends SFAS No. 140. SFAS No. 156 requires that all separately recognized
servicing assets and servicing liabilities be initially measured at fair value. For subsequent
measurements, SFAS No. 156 permits companies to choose between an amortization method or a fair
value measurement method for reporting purposes. SFAS No. 156 is effective as of the beginning of a
companys first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. The Company does not expect SFAS
No. 156 to have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). FIN 48 applies to all tax
positions accounted for under FASB 109. A tax position includes current or future reductions in
taxable income reported or expected to be reported on a tax return. FIN 48 supplements FASB 109 by
defining the confidence level that a tax position must meet in order to be recognized in the
financial statements. The Interpretation requires that the tax effects of a position be recognized
only if it is more-likely-than-not (greater than 50% likelihood) to be sustained based solely on
its technical merits as of the reporting date. In making this assessment, a company must assume
that the taxing authorities will examine the position. The Company currently uses a more stringent
probable threshold for recognizing uncertain tax positions. FIN 48 is effective as of the
beginning of the first fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2006. At adoption, companies must
adjust their financial statements to reflect only those tax positions that are more-likely-than-not
to be sustained as of the adoption date. The necessary adjustments, if any, should be recorded
directly to the beginning balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption and reported as a
change in accounting principle. The Company is currently evaluating the expected effect of the
adoption of FIN 48 on its consolidated financial statements and is not yet in a position to
determine such effects.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior periods financial statements in order
to conform to the current periods presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on previously
reported Net income.
10
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
3. Change in Capitalization Policy
In January 2006, the Company changed its capitalization policy for furniture, equipment and
leasehold improvements, lowering the threshold for capitalizing such purchases from $10 to $2. The
change was made to ensure consistency between the financial accounting and tax treatment for
depreciation of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements. For
the three and six months
ended June 30, 2006, the Company capitalized $77 and $160, respectively that would have been
expensed under the old capitalization policy.
4. Net Capital Requirements and Customer Protection Requirements
The Companys U.S. subsidiary, MarketAxess Corporation, maintains a registration as a U.S.
securities broker-dealer. Pursuant to the Uniform Net Capital Rule under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, MarketAxess Corporation is required to maintain minimum net capital, as defined, equal
to the greater of $5 or 6 2/3% of aggregate indebtedness. A summary of MarketAxess Corporations
capital requirements is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
Net capital |
|
$ |
10,012 |
|
|
$ |
14,820 |
|
Required net capital |
|
|
(575 |
) |
|
|
(1,105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess amount over required net capital |
|
$ |
9,437 |
|
|
$ |
13,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of aggregate indebtedness to net capital |
|
|
1.86 to 1 |
|
|
|
1.12 to 1 |
|
MarketAxess Corporation claims exemption from SEC Rule 15c3-3, as it does not hold customer
securities or funds on account, as defined.
MarketAxess Europe is subject to certain financial resource requirements of the FSA. A summary
of these financial resource requirements is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
Financial resources |
|
$ |
13,903 |
|
|
$ |
10,907 |
|
Resource requirement |
|
|
(3,836 |
) |
|
|
(3,290 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess financial resources |
|
$ |
10,067 |
|
|
$ |
7,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MarketAxess Corporation and MarketAxess Europe Limited are subject to U.S. and U.K.
regulations as broker-dealers which prohibit repayment of borrowings from the Company or
affiliates, paying cash dividends, making loans to the Company or affiliates or otherwise entering
into transactions that result in a significant reduction in regulatory net capital or financial
resources, respectively, without prior notification to or approval from such broker-dealers
principal regulator.
11
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
5. Securities
In January 2005, the Company entered into investment advisory agreements with two of its
stockholder broker-dealer clients. See Related Parties in Footnote 9.
The following is a summary of the Companys Securities available-for-sale as of June 30, 2006
and December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
Securities-available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal agency issues and municipal securities |
|
$ |
61,402 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
|
$ |
61,390 |
|
Corporate Bonds |
|
|
3,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Securities-available-for-sale |
|
$ |
64,908 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
|
$ |
64,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
Securities-available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal agency issues and municipal securities |
|
$ |
50,122 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(119 |
) |
|
$ |
50,003 |
|
Corporate Bonds |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
9,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Securities-available-for-sale |
|
$ |
60,122 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(166 |
) |
|
$ |
59,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Furniture, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements
Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, net, are comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
Computer software and related equipment |
|
$ |
14,508 |
|
|
$ |
12,099 |
|
Office hardware |
|
|
3,108 |
|
|
|
2,990 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
1,671 |
|
|
|
1,481 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(15,149 |
) |
|
|
(12,842 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total furniture and equipment, net |
|
|
4,138 |
|
|
|
3,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
2,213 |
|
|
|
2,207 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(1,420 |
) |
|
|
(1,292 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total leasehold improvements, net |
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, net |
|
$ |
4,931 |
|
|
$ |
4,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
7. |
|
Software Development Costs |
|
|
|
Software development costs, net, are comprised of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
Software development costs |
|
$ |
12,015 |
|
|
$ |
9,848 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(5,392 |
) |
|
|
(3,649 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total software development costs, net |
|
$ |
6,623 |
|
|
$ |
6,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company accounts for software development costs under the provisions of SOP No. 98-1.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, software development costs totaling $817 and
$2,167, respectively, were capitalized. Non-capitalized software costs and routine maintenance
costs are expensed as incurred and are included in Employee compensation and benefits, Technology
and communications and Professional and consulting fees in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
The Companys provision for income taxes, included in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations as determined in accordance with SFAS No. 109, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
221 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
234 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
State and local |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current provision for income taxes |
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
1,922 |
|
State and local |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred provision for income taxes |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
971 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
3,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
586 |
|
|
$ |
991 |
|
|
$ |
899 |
|
|
$ |
3,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of the Companys gross deferred tax asset, reduced to a net deferred tax
asset by a valuation allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
57,580 |
|
|
$ |
57,949 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(15,218 |
) |
|
|
(15,218 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets |
|
|
42,362 |
|
|
|
42,731 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(2,766 |
) |
|
|
(2,927 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets, net |
|
$ |
39,596 |
|
|
$ |
39,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
As of and for the periods then ended, the Company had the following balances and transactions
with the Stockholder Broker-Dealer Clients or their affiliates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
December 31, 2005 |
Cash, cash equivalents and securities |
|
$ |
24,819 |
|
|
$ |
46,739 |
|
Securities
and cash provided as collateral |
|
|
3,299 |
|
|
|
3,299 |
|
Securities
available-for-sale |
|
|
64,896 |
|
|
|
59,956 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
7,980 |
|
|
|
6,751 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and
other liabilities |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Commissions |
|
$ |
8,642 |
|
|
$ |
9,617 |
|
|
$ |
17,499 |
|
|
$ |
20,308 |
|
Information and user access fees |
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
439 |
|
Investment income |
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
Other income |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Securities provided as collateral totaled $3,799 as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005,
respectively. Of this amount, $3,299 was U.S. government obligations on deposit with a related
party in its role as a custodian. The remaining $500 is provided as collateral with a third party
clearing broker for each respective period.
Two Stockholder Broker-Dealer Clients acted in an investment advisory and custodial capacity
for the Company. As of June 30, 2006, the securities under management by these parties had a market
value of $81,028 and are included in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as $16,132
in Cash and cash equivalents and $64,896 in Available-for-sale securities. For the three months
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, investment advisory fees and bank fees paid to these Stockholder
Broker-Dealer Clients were $17 and $13, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2006
and 2005 were $32 and $21, respectively, and are included in General and administrative expenses in
the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
10. |
|
Stock-Based Compensation Plans |
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company recorded stock-based
compensation expense related to employee stock options of $911 and $1,852, respectively, which
includes $786 and $1,525, respectively, related to the adoption of SFAS 123R. Prior to 2006, as
permitted by SFAS 123, the Company accounted for stock-based payments to employees using the APB 25
intrinsic value method. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, the Company recorded
stock-based compensation related to employee stock options of $360 and $760, respectively, pursuant
to APB 25.
As a result of adopting SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006, the Companys Income before income taxes
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was $786 and $1,525 less, respectively, and the
Companys Net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was $442 and $862 less,
respectively, than if it had continued to account for stock-based compensation under APB 25. Basic
EPS for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 would have been $0.04 and $0.09, respectively,
if the Company had not adopted SFAS 123R, compared to reported basic EPS for these periods of $0.03
and $0.06, respectively. Diluted EPS for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 would have
been $0.04 and $0.08, respectively, if the Company had not adopted SFAS 123R, compared to reported
diluted EPS for the same periods of $0.02 and $0.05, respectively.
During the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company recorded compensation
expense for employee restricted stock grants of $296 and $144, respectively, and for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 of $1,133 and $306, respectively.
Stock Options
The Companys 2000 and 2001 Stock Incentive Plans (the 2000 and 2001 Plans) provide for the
grant of options or restricted stock as incentives and rewards to encourage employees, consultants
and non-employee directors to participate in the long-term success of the Company. The 2000 and
2001 Plans provide for the granting of up to 5,082,274 shares of the Companys common stock at fair
value or at a value other than fair value (determined by the Board of Directors or a committee
thereof) on the date the option is granted. Generally the options vest over a three-year period, at
a rate of one-third after one year from the grant date and with the remaining two-thirds vesting on
an equal monthly basis over the remaining two-year period. Options expire ten years from the date
of grant.
14
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
In 2004, the Company adopted the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2004 Plan) to enable it to
offer equity-based awards in the Company to certain of the Companys key employees, consultants and
non-employee directors. The terms of the 2004 Plan are substantially the same as those in the 2000
and 2001 Plans, except as follows: the maximum aggregate number of shares available for grant is
different; the Compensation Committee (the Committee) has flexibility to grant stock appreciation
rights, performance shares, performance units or other stock-based awards (in addition to stock
options and restricted stock); and rights of first refusal and repurchase rights do not apply to
awards granted under the 2004 Plan. A committee appointed by the Board of Directors, which will
consist of at least two non-employee directors, has administered the 2004 Plan. With respect to the
application of the 2004 Plan to non-employee directors, the entire Board of Directors will act as
the committee. The 2004 Plan permits the Company to grant stock options (incentive stock options
and non-qualified stock options), stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance shares,
performance units and other stock-based awards (including, without limitation, restricted stock
units) to certain key employees, consultants and non-employee directors (to the extent permitted by
law), as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion. Through April 27, 2006 up to 2,400,000
shares of the Companys common stock, plus 684,802 shares of common stock transferred to the 2004
Plan from the 2000 and 2001 Plans on November 2, 2004, could have been issued under the 2004 Plan
(subject to adjustment to reflect certain transactions and events specified in the 2004 Plan).
The 2004 Plan provides the Committee with authority and flexibility to determine the terms and
conditions of the awards at the time of grant. The 2004 Plan is intended to constitute a plan
described in Treasury Regulations Section 1.162-27(f)(1), pursuant to which the deduction limits
under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code do not apply during the applicable reliance
period.
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes-Merton closed-form model (Black-Scholes) that uses the assumptions noted in the
following table. The Company believes that the use of the Black-Scholes model meets the fair value
measurement objectives of SFAS 123R and reflects all substantive characteristics of the instruments
being valued. The determination of fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant
using an option-pricing model is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a
number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to,
the expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards and actual and projected employee
stock option exercise behaviors. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of the
Companys stock. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury securities with a maturity
value approximating the expected term of the option. The expected term represents the period of
time that options granted are expected to be outstanding and was increased from four years to five
years in May 2006.
On June 7, 2006, stockholder approval was obtained for an amendment and restatement of the
MarketAxess Holdings Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the Plan), to, among other things, increase
the number of shares authorized for issuance under the Plan from 3,084,802 to 9,754,802 shares. The
Board had previously approved the amended and restated Plan effective April 28, 2006, subject to
stockholder approval.
The Company allocates shares for new stock option grants from the existing Plans. Stock option
grants generally vest over three years.
The following table represents the assumptions used for the Black-Scholes option-pricing model
to determine the per share weighted- average fair value for options granted for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, 2006, |
|
June 30, 2006 |
Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Market Value of Common Stock |
|
$ |
10.73 |
|
|
$ |
11.39 |
|
Dividend Yield |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Weighted-Average Expected Life (years) |
|
|
4.92 |
|
|
|
4.18 |
|
Weighted-Average Risk-Free Interest Rate |
|
|
4.98 |
% |
|
|
4.63 |
% |
Weighted-Average Expected Volatility |
|
|
31.79 |
% |
|
|
36.82 |
% |
15
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The following table reports stock option activity during the six months ended June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Weighted |
|
Contractual |
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Term |
|
Intrinsic Value |
Outstanding at January 1, 2006 |
|
|
5,168,807 |
|
|
$ |
7.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
24,975 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,055,150 |
|
|
$ |
11.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
168 |
|
Canceled |
|
|
(284,528 |
) |
|
$ |
12.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(354,894 |
) |
|
$ |
2.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
5,584,535 |
|
|
$ |
8.30 |
|
|
|
7.23 |
|
|
$ |
22,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
3,900,387 |
|
|
$ |
6.55 |
|
|
|
6.43 |
|
|
$ |
21,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes information regarding the stock options granted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2006 |
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual |
|
Exercise |
|
Number |
|
Exercise |
Range of Exercise Prices |
|
Outstanding |
|
Life |
|
Price |
|
Exercisable |
|
Price |
$2.10 $5.00
|
|
|
2,533,054 |
|
|
|
5.83 |
|
|
$ |
2.79 |
|
|
|
2,531,256 |
|
|
$ |
2.79 |
|
$5.01 $10.00
|
|
|
110,619 |
|
|
|
7.89 |
|
|
$ |
9.05 |
|
|
|
71,254 |
|
|
$ |
8.77 |
|
$10.01 $15.00
|
|
|
2,287,594 |
|
|
|
8.54 |
|
|
$ |
12.21 |
|
|
|
944,019 |
|
|
$ |
12.96 |
|
$15.01 $19.60
|
|
|
653,268 |
|
|
|
7.96 |
|
|
$ |
15.84 |
|
|
|
353,858 |
|
|
$ |
15.92 |
|
As of June 30, 2006, there was $5,581 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
non-vested stock options granted under the Plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of three years.
Restricted Stock
Restricted stock granted under the 2004 Plan generally vests over a period of three years.
Certain grants vest after five years, but contain provisions that allow for accelerated vesting
over a shorter term if defined performance criteria are met. Compensation expense is measured at
the grant date and recognized ratably over the vesting period. The Company considers the likelihood
of meeting the performance criteria in determining the amount to expense on a periodic basis.
The following table reports restricted stock activity during the six months ended June 30,
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
Number of |
|
Grant Date Fair |
|
|
Restricted Shares |
|
Value |
Outstanding at January 1, 2006 |
|
|
189,000 |
|
|
$ |
14.86 |
|
Granted |
|
|
684,000 |
|
|
$ |
12.24 |
|
Canceled |
|
|
(49,165 |
) |
|
$ |
12.69 |
|
Converted to Common Stock |
|
|
(57,409 |
) |
|
$ |
13.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
766,426 |
|
|
$ |
12.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2006, there was $8,630 of total unrecognized compensation expense
related to non-vested restricted stock granted under the 2004 Plan. That cost is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 4.2 years.
SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share, requires the presentation of basic and diluted EPS in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. Basic EPS is computed by dividing the net income
attributable to common stock by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding
for the period. Diluted EPS is computed using the same method as basic EPS, but in the denominator,
shares of common stock outstanding reflect the potential dilution that could occur if convertible
securities or other contracts to issue common stock were converted into or exercised for common
stock.
16
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Basic and diluted EPS for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Basic EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
800 |
|
|
$ |
1,824 |
|
|
$ |
1,886 |
|
|
$ |
4,881 |
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
29,837,704 |
|
|
|
27,727,594 |
|
|
|
29,751,787 |
|
|
|
27,577,551 |
|
Net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
800 |
|
|
$ |
1,824 |
|
|
$ |
1,886 |
|
|
$ |
4,881 |
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding and common
stock equivalents |
|
|
34,944,312 |
|
|
|
35,424,799 |
|
|
|
35,146,052 |
|
|
|
35,453,881 |
|
Net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
12. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
The Company leases office space under non-cancelable lease agreements expiring at various
dates through 2011. These leases are subject to escalation based on certain costs incurred by the
landlord.
Minimum rental commitments under such leases, net of sublease income and restated for the
foreign exchange rate at June 30, 2006, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
Minimum Rentals |
Remaining 2006 |
|
$ |
1,159 |
|
2007 |
|
|
2,370 |
|
2008 |
|
|
2,378 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2,386 |
|
2010 |
|
|
1,253 |
|
Thereafter through 2015 |
|
|
4,016 |
|
The rental expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was $771 and $1,347,
respectively, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 was $472 and $479, respectively, which is
included in General and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company has a sublease agreement for one of its properties. The following table summarizes
information regarding the sublease provisions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sublease Loss Accrual as of: |
|
|
Commencement |
|
Termination |
|
Sublease |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
Location |
|
Date |
|
Date |
|
Rental |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
New York, NY |
|
February 1, 2002 |
|
April 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2006 |
|
April 14, 2011 |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
1,146 |
|
Between May 2002 and May 2005, the Company also had a sublease agreement for its London
property. The sublessee exercised its early termination option as provided in the agreement and
paid the Companys U.K. subsidiary an early termination fee of $225 in May 2005. The Company now
occupies the space.
The Company is contingently obligated for standby letters of credit that were issued to
landlords for office space. The Company uses a U.S. government obligation as collateral for these
standby letters of credit and for the Companys foreign currency forward contracts. This collateral
is included in Securities and cash provided as collateral on the Consolidated Statements of
Financial Condition that had a fair market value as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 of
$3,299.
In June 2006, MarketAxess Corporation commenced operating an anonymous matching service for
its broker-dealer clients. MarketAxess Corporation executes trades on a riskless principal basis,
which are cleared and settled by an independent clearing broker. The securities clearing agreement
that MarketAxess Corporation maintains with the independent clearing broker commenced in December
2004. Under the securities clearing agreement, MarketAxess Corporation maintains a collateral
deposit with the clearing broker in the form of cash or U.S. government securities. As of each of
June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, MarketAxess Corporation had a collateral deposit of $500 with
the independent clearing broker included in Securities and cash provided as
17
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unaudited (Continued)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
collateral on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. MarketAxess Corporation is
exposed to credit risk in the event a contra-party does not fulfill its obligation to complete a
transaction. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement between MarketAxess Corporation and the
independent clearing broker, the clearing broker has the right to charge MarketAxess Corporation
for losses resulting from a counterpartys failure to fulfill its contractual obligations. As the
right to charge MarketAxess Corporation has no maximum amount and applies to all trades executed
through the clearing broker, MarketAxess Corporation believes there is no maximum amount assignable
to this right. At June 30, 2006, MarketAxess Corporation recorded no contingent liabilities with
regard to this right.
Comprehensive income was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
800 |
|
|
$ |
1,824 |
|
|
$ |
1,886 |
|
|
$ |
4,881 |
|
Currency translation adjustments, net of taxes |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
Unrealized gains (losses) on Securities-available-for-sale, net of taxes |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
587 |
|
|
$ |
1,834 |
|
|
$ |
1,729 |
|
|
$ |
4,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
Item 2. Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements may be identified by words
such as expects, intends, anticipates, plans, believes, seeks, estimates, will, or
words of similar meaning and include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the outlook for
our future business and financial performance. Forward-looking statements are based on managements
current expectations and assumptions, which are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and
changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. It is routine for our internal projections
and expectations to change as the year or each quarter in the year progresses, and therefore it
should be clearly understood that the internal projections and beliefs upon which we base our
expectations may change prior to the end of each quarter or the year. Although these expectations
may change, we are under no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements contained
in this report. Our company policy is generally to provide our expectations only once per quarter,
and not to update that information until the next quarter. Actual future events or results may
differ materially from those contained in the projections or forward-looking statements. Factors
that could cause or contribute to such differences include those discussed below and elsewhere in
this report, particularly in the section captioned Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors.
Executive Overview
MarketAxess operates one of the leading platforms for the electronic trading of corporate
bonds and certain other types of fixed-income securities. Through our platform, 676 active
institutional investor client firms (firms that executed at least one trade through our electronic
trading platform between July 2005 and June 2006) can access the aggregate liquidity provided by
the collective interest of our 25 broker-dealer clients in buying or selling bonds through our
platform. Our active institutional investor clients include investment advisers, mutual funds,
insurance companies, public and private pension funds, bank portfolios and hedge funds. We also
provide data and analytical tools that help our clients make trading decisions and we facilitate
the trading process by electronically communicating order information between trading
counterparties. Our revenues are primarily generated from the trading of U.S. and European
high-grade corporate bonds.
Our multi-dealer trading platform allows our institutional investor clients to simultaneously
request competing, executable bids or offers from our broker-dealer clients and execute trades with
the broker-dealer of their choice from among those that choose to respond. We offer our
broker-dealer clients a solution that enables them to efficiently reach our institutional investor
clients for the distribution and trading of bonds. In addition to U.S. high-grade corporate bonds,
European high-grade corporate bonds and emerging markets bonds, including both investment-grade and
non-investment grade debt, we also offer our clients the ability to trade crossover and high-yield
bonds, agency bonds, new issues and credit default swap indices.
The majority of our revenues are derived from commissions for trades executed on our platform
that are billed to our broker-dealer clients on a monthly basis. We also derive revenues from
information and user access fees, license fees and other income. Our expenses consist of employee
compensation and benefits, depreciation and amortization, technology and communication expenses,
professional and consulting fees, marketing and advertising and other general and administrative
expenses.
We seek to grow and diversify our revenues by capitalizing on our status as the operator of a
leading platform for the electronic trading of corporate bonds and certain other types of
fixed-income securities. The key elements of our strategy are:
|
|
|
to innovate and efficiently add new functionality and
product offerings to the MarketAxess platform that we
believe will help to increase our market share with
existing clients, as well as expand our client base; |
|
|
|
|
to leverage our technology, as well as our strong
broker-dealer and institutional investor relationships, to
deploy our electronic trading platform into additional
product and client segments within the fixed-income
securities markets; |
|
|
|
|
to continue building our existing service offerings so that
our electronic trading platform is fully integrated into
the workflow of our broker-dealer and institutional
investor clients and to continue to add functionality to
allow our clients to achieve a fully automated end-to-end
straight-through processing solution (automation from trade
initiation to settlement); |
|
|
|
|
to add new content and analytical capabilities to Corporate
BondTicker in order to improve the value of the
information we provide to our clients; and |
|
|
|
|
to continue to supplement our internal growth by entering
into strategic alliances, or acquiring businesses or
technologies that will enable us to enter new markets,
provide new products or services, or otherwise enhance the
value of our platform to our clients. |
19
Critical Factors Affecting Our Industry and Our Company
Economic, Political and Market Factors
The global fixed-income securities industry is risky and volatile and is directly affected by
a number of economic, political and market factors that may result in declining trading volume.
These factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations. These factors include: the current interest rate environment, including the
volatility of interest rates and investors forecasts of future interest rates; the level of
corporate bond credit spreads and credit spread volatility; and adverse market conditions,
including unforeseen market closures or other disruptions in trading. Any one or more of these
factors may contribute to reduced trading activity in the fixed-income securities markets
generally. Our revenues and profitability are likely to decline during periods of stagnant economic
conditions or low trading volume in the U.S. and global fixed-income securities markets.
Competitive Landscape
The global fixed-income securities industry generally, and the electronic financial services
markets in which we operate in particular, are highly competitive, and we expect competition to
intensify in the future. We will continue to compete with bond trading conducted directly between
broker-dealers and their institutional investor clients over the telephone or electronically. In
addition, our current and prospective competitors are numerous and include: other multi-dealer
trading companies; market data and information vendors; securities and futures exchanges;
inter-dealer brokerage firms; and electronic communications networks not currently in the
securities business. We believe that we compete favorably with respect to: the liquidity provided
on our platform; the magnitude and frequency of price improvement enabled by our platform; the
quality and speed of execution; total transaction costs; technology capabilities, including the
ease of use of our trading platform; and the range of products and services.
Regulatory Environment
Our industry has been and is subject to continuous regulatory changes and may become subject
to new regulations or changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing regulations, which
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Rapid Technological Changes
We must continue to enhance and improve our electronic trading platform. The electronic
financial services industry is characterized by increasingly complex systems and infrastructures
and new business models. If new industry standards and practices emerge, our existing technology,
systems and electronic trading platform may become obsolete or our existing business may be harmed.
Our future success will depend on our ability to: enhance our existing products and services;
develop and/or license new products and technologies that address the increasingly sophisticated
and varied needs of our broker-dealer and institutional investor clients and prospective clients;
and respond to technological advances and emerging industry standards and practices on a
cost-effective and timely basis.
Trends in Our Business
The majority of our revenues are derived from commissions for transactions executed on our
platform between our institutional investor and broker-dealer clients. We believe that there are
five key variables that impact the notional value of such transactions on our platform and the
amount of commissions earned by us:
|
|
|
the number of institutional investor clients that participate on the platform and
their willingness to originate transactions through the platform; |
|
|
|
|
the number of broker-dealer clients on the platform and the competitiveness of
the prices they provide to the institutional investor clients; |
|
|
|
|
the number of markets for which we make trading available to our clients; |
|
|
|
|
the overall level of activity in these markets; and |
|
|
|
|
the level of commissions that we collect for trades executed through the platform. |
We believe that overall corporate bond market trading volume is affected by various factors
including the absolute levels of interest rates, the direction of interest rate movements, the
level of new issues of corporate bonds and the volatility of corporate bond spreads versus U.S.
Treasury securities. Because a significant percentage of our revenue is tied directly to the volume
of securities traded on our platform, it is likely that a general decline in trading volumes,
regardless of the cause of such decline, would reduce our revenues and have a significant negative
impact on profitability.
20
Commission Revenue Trends
Commissions
are generally calculated as a percentage of the notional dollar volume of bonds
traded on our platform and vary based on the type and the maturity of the bond traded.
On June 1,
2005, we introduced a new fee plan primarily for secondary market transactions in
U.S. high-grade corporate bonds executed on our electronic trading platform. As of June 30, 2006,
18 of our U.S. high-grade broker-dealer clients have signed new two-year agreements that supersede
the fee arrangements that we entered into with many of our broker-dealer clients during the third
quarter of 2003. The new plan incorporates higher fixed monthly fees and lower variable fees for
our broker-dealer clients than the previous U.S high-grade corporate transaction fee plans and
incorporates volume incentives to our broker-dealer clients that are designed to increase the
volume of transactions effected on our platform. Under the new fee plan, the Company electronically
adds the variable fee to the spread quoted by the broker-dealer client but does not charge for
inquiries that an institutional investor client sends to a single broker-dealer client. The
combination of higher fixed and lower variable fees in the new plan results in higher revenue to
the Company at lower volume levels but will limit revenue growth in the future for U.S high-grade
corporate bond trading as volume levels increase.
For
European high-grade corporate bond trades, broker-dealer transaction fees vary based on
the type of bond traded. Different fee schedules apply to fixed rate and floating rate bonds.
Within the schedule for fixed rate bonds, the fee varies depending on whether the bond is a
corporate or a sovereign issue. For corporate bonds, the fee also varies depending on the maturity
of the issue. This fee schedule applies a tiered fee structure, which reduces the fee per trade
upon the attainment of certain specified amounts of monthly commissions generated by a particular
broker-dealer and does not carry a fixed monthly fee or fee cap.
In
September 2005, the Company launched electronic credit default swap index trading on its
platform and charges commissions to both broker-dealer and institutional clients calculated as a
percentage of the notional volume of transactions traded. Broker-dealer clients are able to select
between standard fee schedules that contain monthly minimum commissions and, in some cases, monthly
fee caps.
In
June 2006, we introduced functionality that allows broker-dealer clients to transact U.S.
corporate bond trades on our platform with other broker-dealer clients. MarketAxess acts as
intermediary in these transactions by serving as counterparty to the two broker-dealer clients
involved. We charge a fee to both broker-dealer clients involved in the transaction that is based
on the size of the transaction and the maturity of the bond traded.
Commissions
for other products generally vary based on the type and the maturity of the bond
traded. Factors that we consider when setting commission rates include those charged by
inter-dealer brokers in the respective markets, average bid-offer spreads in the products we serve
and transaction costs through alternative channels including the telephone.
We
anticipate that some reduction in average fees per million may occur in the future.
Consequently, past trends in commissions are not necessarily indicative of future commissions.
Other Revenue Trends
In
addition to the commissions discussed above, we earn revenue from certain fees paid by
institutional investor and broker-dealer clients and from income on investments.
We charge
information services fees for Corporate BondTicker to our broker-dealer clients,
institutional investor clients and data-only subscribers. The information services fee is a flat
monthly fee, based on the level of service. We also generate information service fees from the sale
of bulk data to certain institutional investor clients and data only subscribers.
Institutional
investor clients trading U.S. high-grade corporate bonds are charged a monthly
user access fee for the use of our platform. The fee, billed quarterly, is charged to the client
based on the number of the clients users. To encourage institutional investor clients to execute
trades on our U.S. high-grade corporate bond platform, we reduce these information and user access
fees for such clients once minimum quarterly trading volumes are attained.
Broker-dealer
clients, other than those that made equity investments in the Company, typically
pay an initial license fee, which is due and payable upon execution of the broker-dealer agreement.
The initial license fee varies by agreement and at a minimum is generally intended to cover the
initial set-up costs incurred to enable a broker-dealer to begin using the Companys electronic
trading platform.
21
Expense Trends
In the normal course of business, we incur the following expenses:
|
|
|
employee compensation and benefits expenses, which include salaries, incentive compensation
and related employee benefits and taxes; |
|
|
|
|
depreciation and amortization expenses, which result primarily from the depreciation of the
fixed assets we purchase, including computer software and hardware used in the development of
our trading systems; |
|
|
|
|
technology and communications expenses, which consist primarily of costs for our network
connections with our customers and our data centers, as well as connectivity to various other
market participants; |
|
|
|
|
professional and consulting expenses, which consist primarily of legal and accounting expenses; |
|
|
|
|
marketing and advertising expenses, which consist primarily of media, print and other
advertising expenses as well as client marketing expenses; and |
|
|
|
|
general and administrative expenses, which include travel and entertainment expenses, rental
and occupancy expenses, and other administrative expenses and general office costs. |
We
anticipate expense growth in the future, primarily due to investment
in new products, notably in employee compensation and benefits,
professional and consulting fees, and general and administrative expenses but we believe that
operating leverage can be achieved by increasing volumes in existing products and adding new
products without substantial additions to our infrastructure.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS 123R, which requires the measurement and
recognition of compensation expense for all stock-based payment awards made to employees and
directors, based on estimated fair values. SFAS 123R supersedes the Companys previous accounting
under APB 25 for periods beginning in fiscal 2006. In March 2005, the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107) relating to SFAS 123R. The Company
has applied the provisions of SAB 107 in its adoption of SFAS 123R.
The Company adopted SFAS 123R using the modified prospective transition method, which requires
the application of the accounting standard as of January 1, 2006. The Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 reflect the impact
of SFAS 123R. In accordance with the modified prospective transition method, the Companys
Consolidated Financial Statements for prior periods have not been restated to reflect, and do not
include the impact of SFAS 123R. Stock-based compensation expense recognized under SFAS 123R for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was $0.8 million and $1.5 million, respectively, which
consisted of stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock options.
SFAS 123R requires companies to estimate the fair value of stock-based payment awards on the
date of grant using an option-pricing model. The Company believes that the use of the Black-Scholes
model meets the fair value measurement objectives of SFAS 123R and reflects all substantive
characteristics of the instruments being valued. The determination of fair value of share-based
payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model is affected by our stock price as
well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables
include, but are not limited to, the expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards
and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors. Expected volatilities are
currently based on historical volatility of the Companys stock. The risk-free interest rate is
based on U.S. Treasury securities with a maturity value approximating the expected term of the
option. The expected term of five years represents the period of time that options granted are
expected to be outstanding. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to
vest is recognized as expense in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations over the
requisite service periods.
Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Companys Consolidated Statements of
Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 included compensation expense for
stock-based payment awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of December 31, 2005 based on
the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the pro forma provisions of SFAS 123 and
compensation expense for the stock-based payment awards granted subsequent to December 31, 2005
based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R. As
stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2006 is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has
been reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS 123R requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time
of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those
estimates. In the Companys pro forma information required under SFAS 123 for the periods prior to
fiscal 2006, the Company accounted for forfeitures as they occurred.
As of June 30, 2006, there was $5.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
non-vested stock options granted under the Companys Stock Incentive Plans. That cost is expected
to be recognized over a weighted-average period of three years.
If factors change and we employ different assumptions in the application of SFAS 123R in
future periods, the compensation expense we record under SFAS 123R may differ significantly from
that recorded in the current period.
22
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2005
Overview
For the three months ended June 30, 2006, Income before income taxes decreased by $1.4 million
or 50.8% to $1.4 million compared to Income before income taxes of $2.8 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2005. Net income decreased by $1.0 million or 56.2% to $0.8 million compared
to Net income of $1.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005.
Total revenues increased by $0.8 million or 4.4% to $20.1 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2006 from $19.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. This increase in Total
revenues was primarily due to increases in Commissions of $0.5 million, Information and user access
fees of $0.3 million and Investment income of $0.3 million, offset by a decrease in License fees of
$0.3 million.
Total expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2006 increased by $2.3 million or 13.8% to
$18.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from $16.5 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2005. This increase in Total expenses was primarily due to increases in Employee
compensation and benefits of $1.8 million, General and administrative expenses of $0.6 million and
Depreciation and amortization of $0.2 million, offset by decreases in Professional and consulting
fees of $0.2 million and Marketing and advertising of $0.1 million.
Revenues
Our revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005, and the resulting
dollar and percentage change, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. high-grade |
|
$ |
10,975 |
|
|
|
54.5 |
% |
|
$ |
11,562 |
|
|
|
60.0 |
% |
|
$ |
(587 |
) |
|
|
(5.1 |
)% |
European
high-grade |
|
|
4,089 |
|
|
|
20.3 |
|
|
|
3,336 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,194 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
1,828 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commissions |
|
|
17,258 |
|
|
|
85.7 |
|
|
|
16,726 |
|
|
|
86.8 |
|
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Information and user
access fees |
|
|
1,323 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
31.8 |
|
License fees |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
(56.4 |
) |
Investment income |
|
|
1,084 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
777 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
39.5 |
|
Other |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(14.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
20,122 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
19,282 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
840 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have historically earned a substantial portion of our commissions and overall
revenues from broker-dealer clients that are (or whose affiliates are) our stockholders. The
percentage of our revenues derived from our broker-dealer clients that are also our stockholders
has been declining. For the three months ended June 30, 2006, the percentage decreased to 46.6%
from 55.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2005. Affiliates of most of our broker-dealer
clients are also among our institutional investor clients. A table detailing the amount of revenues
generated by nine broker-dealer clients that were also our stockholders as of January 1, 2006 (ABN
Amro, Banc of America Securities, Bear Stearns, BNP Paribas, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank,
JPMorgan, Lehman Brothers and UBS), and their respective affiliates, as well as the corresponding
percentage of total revenues, is provided below for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
Total revenues generated by
Stockholder Broker-Dealer Clients
and their respective affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions |
|
$ |
8,642 |
|
|
$ |
9,617 |
|
Information and user access fees |
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
Investment income |
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
Other |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
generated by Stockholder
Broker-Dealer Clients and
their respective
affiliates |
|
$ |
9,389 |
|
|
$ |
10,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of total revenues
generated by Stockholder
Broker-Dealer Clients and their
respective affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions |
|
|
50.1 |
% |
|
|
57.5 |
% |
Information and user access fees |
|
|
25.5 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
|
Investment income |
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
Other |
|
|
53.4 |
|
|
|
59.8 |
|
Percentage of total
revenues generated by
Stockholder Broker-Dealer
Clients and their
respective affiliates |
|
|
46.6 |
% |
|
|
55.9 |
% |
Commissions. Commissions are generally calculated as a percentage of the notional dollar volume of
bonds traded on our platform and vary based on the type, size, yield and maturity of the bond
traded. The commission rates are based on a number of factors, including fees charged by
inter-dealer brokers in the respective markets, average bid-offer spreads in the products we offer,
transaction costs through alternative channels including the telephone and the trading volume
executed through our platform by the broker-dealer completing the trade. Under our transaction fee
plans, bonds that are more actively traded or that have shorter maturities are generally charged
lower commissions, while bonds that are less actively traded or that have longer maturities
generally command higher commissions.
Total commissions increased by $0.5 million or 3.2% to $17.3 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2006 from $16.7 million for the comparable period in 2005.
U.S. high-grade commissions decreased by $0.6 million or 5.1% to $11.0 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2006 from $11.6 million for the comparable period in 2005. The lower
commissions resulted from a decrease in U.S. high-grade volume of $1.4 billion or 3.1% from $44.7
billion for the three months ended June 30, 2005 to $43.2 billion for the three months ended June
30, 2006 and a decrease in the average U.S. high-grade fee from $259 per million for the three
months ended June 30, 2005 to $254 per million for the three
months ended June 30, 2006. During the three months ended
June 30, 2006, there were two fewer trading days in the U.S. than
during the three months ended June 30, 2005. The fixed
monthly U.S. high-grade fees increased to $7.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006
compared to $5.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005.
European high-grade commissions increased by $0.8 million or 22.6% for the three months ended
June 30, 2006 to $4.1 million from $3.3 million for the comparable period in 2005. The higher
commissions resulted from an increase in European high-grade volume of $5.8 billion or 34.3% from
$17.0 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2005 to $22.8 billion for the three months ended
June 30, 2006 that was partially offset by a decrease in the average European high-grade fee from
$197 per million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 to $179 per million for the three months
ended June 30, 2006. The decrease in the average European high-grade fee per million resulted from
an amendment to our standard fee schedules in June 2005 and an increase in the volume of
transactions that have lower fees per million. During the three
months ended June 30, 2006 there were three fewer trading days
in the U.K. than during the three months ended June 30, 2005.
Other commissions increased by $0.4 million or 20.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2006
to $2.2 million from $1.8 million for the comparable period in 2005. Other volumes increased by
$2.9 billion or 27.9% from $10.5 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2005 to $13.4 billion
for the three months ended June 30, 2006. Other fees per million decreased from $175 per million
for the three months ended June 30, 2005 to $164 per million for the three months ended June 30,
2006, resulting from a change in the mix of business.
24
Our trading volume and average fees per million traded for the three months ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Trading Volume Data (in billions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. high-grade |
|
$ |
39.1 |
|
|
$ |
43.8 |
|
European high-grade |
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
Other |
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub Total |
|
|
75.3 |
|
|
|
71.3 |
|
Single Dealer Inquiries |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
79.4 |
|
|
$ |
72.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions (in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. high-grade |
|
$ |
10,975 |
|
|
$ |
11,562 |
|
European high-grade |
|
|
4,089 |
|
|
|
3,336 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,194 |
|
|
|
1,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
17,258 |
|
|
$ |
16,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Fee Per Million Traded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. high-grade |
|
$ |
254 |
|
|
$ |
259 |
|
European high-grade |
|
$ |
179 |
|
|
$ |
197 |
|
Other |
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
$ |
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Fee Per Million Traded for All Products, Excluding Single-Dealer Inquiries |
|
$ |
229 |
|
|
$ |
235 |
|
Average Fee Per Million Traded for All Products, Including Single-Dealer Inquiries |
|
$ |
217 |
|
|
$ |
232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of U.S. Trading Days |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Number of U.K. Trading Days |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
For volume reporting purposes, transactions in foreign currencies are converted to U.S.
dollars at the exchange rates prevailing on the day the transactions were executed.
Single-dealer inquiries represent U.S. high-grade trades on which no fees were charged in
accordance with the U.S. high-grade corporate bond fee plan that went into effect on June 1, 2005.
The U.S. high-grade average fee per million is calculated for each period presented using the
variable transaction fees and the fixed monthly fees paid by our broker-dealer clients.
In September 2005, the Company launched electronic credit default swap index trading on its
platform. Trading volume data and commissions related to these transactions are included in Other.
In June 2006, the Company launched U.S. corporate bond trading between broker-dealer clients.
Trading volume data and commissions related to these transactions are included in either U.S.
high-grade or Other trading volumes, as appropriate. The Company serves as a counterparty to both a
buyer and a seller in matching these back-to-back trades with its broker-dealer clients and
accordingly includes both transactions in its reported volume.
The following table shows the extent to which the changes in revenue for the three months
ended June 30, 2006 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2005 were attributable to
increases in volumes, reductions in the average level of commissions charged and other factors not
related to commission revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Volume increases |
|
$ |
1,701 |
|
Average fee reductions |
|
|
(1,169 |
) |
Increase in Information and user access revenue |
|
|
319 |
|
Decrease in License fees |
|
|
(277 |
) |
Increase in Investment income |
|
|
307 |
|
Other |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total revenue increase |
|
$ |
840 |
|
|
|
|
|
25
Our active institutional investor clients and broker-dealer clients as of June 30,
2006 and June 30, 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Institutional Investor Clients: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US |
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
Europe |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broker-Dealer Clients |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information and User Access Fees. Information and user access fees consist of fees charged for
Corporate BondTicker to our broker-dealer clients, institutional investor clients and data-only
subscribers; and monthly access fees charged to institutional investor clients for the use of our
platform. Information and user access fees increased by $0.3 million or 31.8% to $1.3 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2006 from $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005.
This increase was primarily due to an increase in the number of subscribers to our Corporate
BondTicker service and increased sales of our bulk data.
License Fees. License fees consist of fees received from broker-dealer clients for access to
our trading platform through a non-exclusive and non-transferable license. The license fee is a
one-time fee and is recognized in the first three months of the agreement in the estimated amount
of the set-up costs that we incur and the remaining amount is amortized over the initial term of
the agreement, which is generally three years. License fees decreased by $0.3 million or 56.4% to
$0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from $0.5 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2005. This decrease was attributable to a decline in the amortization of previously
received license fees with no offset from new dealers joining the platform during the quarter ended
June 30, 2006, as all major dealers now utilize the platform and fewer remain as potential
additions.
Investment Income. Investment income consists of income earned on our investments. Investment
income increased by $0.3 million or 39.5% to $1.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006
from $0.8 million for the comparable period in 2005. This increase was due to higher Securities
balances and a rise in interest rates during the three months ended June 30, 2006 as compared to
the comparable period in 2005.
Other. Other revenues consist of telecommunications line charges to broker-dealer clients and
other miscellaneous revenues. Other revenues decreased by $0.1 million or 14.4% to $0.2 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared to $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30,
2005.
26
Expenses
Our expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005, and the resulting
dollar and percentage change, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation and
benefits |
|
$ |
10,498 |
|
|
|
52.2 |
% |
|
$ |
8,673 |
|
|
|
45.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,825 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
% |
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
1,637 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
1,424 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
Technology and
communications |
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
1,823 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
Professional and
consulting fees |
|
|
2,488 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
2,735 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
(247 |
) |
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
Marketing and advertising |
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
(19.0 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
1,845 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
50.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
$ |
18,736 |
|
|
|
93.1 |
% |
|
$ |
16,467 |
|
|
|
85.4 |
% |
|
$ |
2,270 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Compensation and Benefits. Employee compensation and benefits is comprised of
salaries, stock compensation costs, other incentive compensation, related employee benefits and
payroll taxes. Employee compensation and benefits increased by $1.8 million or 21.0% to $10.5
million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from $8.7 million for the three months ended June
30, 2005. This increase was primarily due to increased salary expenses of $1.0 million, increased
stock option costs of $0.8 million following the adoption of SFAS 123R, which requires the
expensing of stock options over the vesting period, the severance payment of $0.3 million to
terminated employees and lower capitalization of technology
development wages. The total number of
employees increased to 186 as of June 30, 2006 from 177 as of June 30, 2005. As a percentage of
total revenues, Employee compensation and benefits expense increased to 52.2% for the three months
ended June 30, 2006 from 45.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2005.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense results from the
depreciation of fixed assets, which consist of computer hardware, furniture and fixtures, and the
amortization of software, capitalized software development costs and leasehold improvements.
Depreciation and amortization increased by $0.2 million or 15.0% to $1.6 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2006 compared to $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. This
increase was attributable to increased depreciation of capitalized software development costs and
purchased software licenses. For the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, we capitalized $0.8
million of software development costs.
Technology and Communications. Technology and communications expense consists primarily of
costs for our network connections, data center hosting and data feeds provided by outside vendors
and service providers. Technology and communications expense decreased by $0.03 million or 1.7% to
$1.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006. This decrease was attributable to reduced
costs relating to production telecommunications and data center hosting.
Professional and Consulting Fees. Professional and consulting fees consist of fees paid for
accounting and legal fees, information technology and non-information technology consultant costs.
Professional and consulting fees decreased by $0.2 million or 9.0% to $2.5 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2006 from $2.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. This
decrease was attributable to reduced recruiting fees, partially offset by increased technology
consulting costs.
Marketing and Advertising. Marketing and advertising expense consists primarily of print and
other advertising expenses we incur to promote our products and services. This expense also
includes costs associated with attending or exhibiting at industry-sponsored seminars, conferences
and conventions. Also included in this expense are travel and entertainment expenses incurred by
our sales force to promote our trading platform and information services. Marketing and advertising
expense decreased by $0.1 million or 19.0% to $0.5 million for the three months ended June
30, 2006 from $0.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. This decrease was primarily
due to a reduction in advertising expenditures.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expense consists primarily of occupancy
and utilities, general travel and entertainment, staff training, board of directors costs, various
state franchise taxes and U.K. value-added taxes. General and administrative expense increased by
$0.6 million or 50.9% to $1.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from $1.2 million
27
for the three months ended June 30, 2005. This increase was primarily due to an increase in state
and local franchise and UK value-added taxes, as well as increases in occupancy costs, travel and
entertainment costs and board of directors expenses.
Provision for Income Tax
For the three months ended June 30, 2006, we recorded an income tax provision of $0.6 million.
The provision consists principally of $0.2 million in federal taxes, $0.1 million in state and
local taxes and $0.2 million in foreign taxes.
For the three months ended June 30, 2005, we recorded an income tax provision of $1.0 million.
The provision consisted primarily of $0.7 million in federal taxes, $0.2 million in state and local
taxes and $0.1 million in foreign taxes.
For the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, with the exception of the payment of
certain state and local taxes, the provision for income taxes was a non-cash expense since the
Company had available net operating loss carryforwards and tax credits to offset the cash payment
of taxes.
Our consolidated effective tax rate can vary from period to period depending on, among other
factors, the geographic and business mix of our earnings.
28
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2005
Overview
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, Income before income taxes decreased by $5.4 million
or 66.0% to $2.8 million compared to Income before income taxes of $8.2 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2005. Net income decreased by $3.0 million or 61.3% to $1.9 million compared to Net
income of $4.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005.
Total revenues decreased by $0.1 million or 0.3% to $40.5 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2006 from $40.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. This decrease in Total
revenues was primarily due to decreases in License fees of $0.8 million and Commissions of $0.6
million, offset by increases in Investment income of $0.7 million and Information and user access
fees of $0.6 million.
Total expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2006 increased by $5.3 million or 16.3% to
$37.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from $32.4 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2005. This increase in Total expenses was primarily due to increases in Employee
compensation and benefits of $2.9 million, General and administrative expenses of $1.3 million,
Depreciation and amortization of $0.7 million, Professional and consulting fees of $0.4 million and
Technology and communications of $0.4 million, offset by a decrease in Marketing and
advertising of $0.4 million.
Revenues
Our revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005, and the resulting
dollar and percentage change, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. high-grade |
|
$ |
22,004 |
|
|
|
54.4 |
% |
|
$ |
24,080 |
|
|
|
59.3 |
% |
|
$ |
(2,076 |
) |
|
|
(8.6 |
)% |
European high-grade |
|
|
8,427 |
|
|
|
20.8 |
|
|
|
7,737 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,314 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
3,562 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commissions |
|
|
34,745 |
|
|
|
85.9 |
|
|
|
35,379 |
|
|
|
87.2 |
|
|
|
(634 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
Information and user access
fees |
|
|
2,682 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
2,039 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
31.5 |
|
License fees |
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
(776 |
) |
|
|
(61.1 |
) |
Investment income |
|
|
2,046 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
1,377 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
48.6 |
|
Other |
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
40,462 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
40,590 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
(128 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have historically earned a substantial portion of our commissions and overall
revenues from broker-dealer clients that are (or whose affiliates are) our stockholders. The
percentage of our revenues derived from our broker-dealer clients that are also our stockholders
has been declining. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, the percentage has decreased to 46.5%
from 53.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Affiliates of most of our broker-dealer clients
are also among our institutional investor clients. A table detailing the amount of revenues
generated by nine broker-dealer clients that were also our stockholders as of January 1, 2006 (ABN
Amro, Banc of America Securities, Bear Stearns, BNP Paribas, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank,
JPMorgan, Lehman Brothers and UBS), and their respective affiliates, as well as the corresponding
percentage of total revenues, is provided below for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and June 30,
2005.
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
Total revenues generated by
Stockholder Broker-Dealer Clients and
their respective affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions |
|
$ |
17,499 |
|
|
$ |
20,308 |
|
Information and user access fees |
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
439 |
|
Investment income |
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
Other |
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues generated
by Stockholder Broker-Dealer
Clients and their respective
affiliates |
|
$ |
18,824 |
|
|
$ |
21,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of total revenues
generated by Stockholder Broker-Dealer
Clients and their respective affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions |
|
|
50.4 |
% |
|
|
57.4 |
% |
Information and user access fees |
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
Investment income |
|
|
22.2 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
Other |
|
|
53.4 |
|
|
|
51.9 |
|
Percentage of total
revenues generated by
Stockholder Broker-Dealer
Clients and their respective
affiliates |
|
|
46.5 |
% |
|
|
53.3 |
% |
Commissions. Commissions are generally calculated as a percentage of the notional dollar volume of
bonds traded on our platform and vary based on the type, size, yield and maturity of the bond
traded. The commission rates are based on a number of factors, including fees charged by
inter-dealer brokers in the respective markets, average bid-offer spreads in the products we offer,
transaction costs though alternative channels including the telephone and the trading volume
executed through our platform by the broker-dealer completing the trade. Under our transaction fee
plans, bonds that are more actively traded or that have shorter maturities are generally charged
lower commissions, while bonds that are less actively traded or that have longer maturities
generally command higher commissions.
Total commissions decreased by $0.6 million or 1.8% to $34.7 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2006 from $35.4 million for the comparable period in 2005.
U.S. high-grade commissions decreased by $2.1 million or 8.6% to $22.0 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 from $24.1 million for the comparable period in 2005. The lower
commissions resulted from a decrease in U.S. high-grade volume of $10.3 billion or 10.3% from $99.4
billion for the six months ended June 30, 2005 to $89.1 billion for the six months ended June 30,
2006. The decrease in volumes was partially offset by an increase in the average U.S. high-grade
fee from $242 per million for the six months ended June 30, 2005
to $247 per million for the six
months ended June 30, 2006. The fixed monthly U.S. high-grade fees increased to $14.7 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to $10.5 million for the six months ended June 30,
2005.
European high-grade commissions increased by $0.7 million or 8.9% to $8.4 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 from $7.7 million for the comparable period in 2005. The higher
commissions resulted from an increase in European high-grade volume of $6.9 billion or 17.3% from
$39.9 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2005 to $46.8 billion for the six months ended June
30, 2006 that was partially offset by a decrease in the average European high-grade fee from $194
per million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 to $180 per million for the six months ended
June 30, 2006. The decrease in the average European high-grade fee per million resulted from an
amendment to our standard fee schedules in June 2005 and an increase in the volume of transactions
that have lower fees per million.
Other commissions increased by $0.8 million or 21.1% to $4.3 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2006 from $3.6 million for the comparable period in 2005. Other volumes increased by $6.0
billion or 27.2% from $22.0 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2005 to $28.0 billion for the
six months ended June 30, 2006. Other fees per million decreased from $162 per million for the six
months ended June 30, 2005 to $154 per million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, resulting
from a change in the mix of business.
30
Our trading volume and average fees per million traded for the six months ended June
30, 2006 and 2005, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Trading Volume Data (in billions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. high-grade |
|
$ |
79.7 |
|
|
$ |
98.5 |
|
European high-grade |
|
|
46.8 |
|
|
|
39.9 |
|
Other |
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub Total |
|
|
154.5 |
|
|
|
160.4 |
|
Single Dealer Inquiries |
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
163.9 |
|
|
$ |
161.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions (in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. high-grade |
|
$ |
22,004 |
|
|
$ |
24,080 |
|
European high-grade |
|
|
8,427 |
|
|
|
7,737 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,314 |
|
|
|
3,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
34,745 |
|
|
$ |
35,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Fee Per Million Traded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. high-grade |
|
$ |
247 |
|
|
$ |
242 |
|
European high-grade |
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
194 |
|
Other |
|
$ |
154 |
|
|
$ |
162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Fee Per Million Traded For
All Products, Excluding Single-Dealer
Inquiries |
|
$ |
225 |
|
|
$ |
221 |
|
Average Fee Per Million Traded For All
Products, Including Single-Dealer
Inquiries |
|
$ |
212 |
|
|
$ |
219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of U.S. Trading Days |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
Number of U.K. Trading Days |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
For volume reporting purposes, transactions in foreign currencies are converted to
U.S. dollars at the exchange rates prevailing on the day the transactions were executed.
Single-dealer inquiries represent U.S. high-grade trades on which no fees were charged in
accordance with the U.S. high-grade corporate bond fee plan that went into effect on June 1, 2005.
The U.S high-grade average fee per million is calculated for each period presented using the
variable transaction fees and the fixed monthly fees paid by our broker-dealer clients.
In September 2005, the Company launched electronic credit default swap index trading on its
platform. Trading volume data and commissions related to these transactions are included in Other.
In June 2006, the Company launched electronic U.S. corporate bond trading between
broker-dealer clients. Trading volume data and commissions related to these transactions are
included in either U.S. high-grade or Other trading volumes, as appropriate. The Company serves as
a counterparty to both a buyer and a seller in matching these back-to-back trades with its
broker-dealer clients and accordingly includes both transactions in its reported volume.
31
The following table shows the extent to which the changes in revenue for the six months ended
June 30, 2006 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2005 were attributable to increases in
volumes, reductions in the average level of commissions charged and other factors not related to
commission revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Volume increases |
|
$ |
725 |
|
Average fee reductions |
|
|
(1,359 |
) |
Increase in Information services and user access revenue |
|
|
643 |
|
Decrease in License Fees |
|
|
(776 |
) |
Increase in Investment income |
|
|
669 |
|
Other |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total revenue decrease |
|
$ |
(128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Our active institutional investor clients and broker-dealer clients as of June 30, 2006 and June
30, 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Institutional Investor Clients: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US |
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
Europe |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broker-Dealer Clients |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
Information and User Access Fees. Information and user access fees consist of fees
charged for Corporate BondTicker to our broker-dealer clients, institutional investor clients and
data-only subscribers; and monthly access fees charged to institutional investor clients for the
use of our platform. Information and user access fees increased by $0.6 million or 31.5% to $2.7
million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30,
2005. This increase was primarily due to an increase in the number of subscribers to our corporate
BondTicker service and increased sales of bulk data.
License Fees. License fees consist of fees received from broker-dealer clients for access to
our trading platform through a non-exclusive and non-transferable license. The license fee is a
one-time fee and is recognized in the first three months of the agreement in the estimated amount
of the set-up costs that we incur and the remaining amount is amortized over the initial term of
the agreement, which is generally three years. License fees decreased by $0.7 million or 61.1% to
$0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from $1.3 million for the six months ended June
30, 2005. This decrease was attributable to a decline in the amortization of previously received
license fees with no offset from new dealers joining the platform during the six months ended June
30, 2006, as all major dealers now utilize the platform and fewer other dealers remain as potential
additions.
Investment Income. Investment income consists of income earned on our investments. Investment
income increased by $0.7 million or 48.6% to $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006
from $1.4 million for the comparable period in 2005. This
increase was due to higher Securities
balances and a rise in interest rates during the six months ended June 30, 2006 as compared to the
comparable period in 2005.
Other. Other revenues consist of telecommunications line charges to broker-dealer clients and
other miscellaneous revenues. Other revenues decreased by $30,000 or 5.7% to $0.5 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005.
Expenses
Our expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005, and the resulting
dollar and percentage change, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% of Revenues |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation and
benefits |
|
$ |
20,781 |
|
|
|
51.4 |
% |
|
$ |
17,917 |
|
|
|
44.1 |
% |
|
$ |
2,864 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
% |
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
3,322 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
2,649 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
Technology and
communications |
|
|
3,843 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
3,448 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
Professional and
consulting fees |
|
|
5,039 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
4,629 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
Marketing and advertising |
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
(33.3 |
) |
Moneyline revenue share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
3,837 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
2,527 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
1,310 |
|
|
|
51.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
$ |
37,677 |
|
|
|
93.1 |
% |
|
$ |
32,402 |
|
|
|
79.8 |
% |
|
$ |
5,275 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Compensation and Benefits. Employee compensation and benefits is comprised of salaries,
stock compensation costs, other incentive compensation and related employee benefits and payroll
taxes. Employee compensation and benefits increased by $2.9 million or 16.0% to $20.8 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2006 from $17.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. This
increase was primarily due to increased employee stock compensation expense of $1.5 million
following the adoption of SFAS 123R, which requires the expensing of stock options over the vesting
period, the addition of new employees to support our growth (including the development of credit
derivatives trading services), increased benefit costs and the severance payment of $0.3 million to
terminated employees. The total number of
employees increased to 186 as of June 30, 2006 from 177 as of June 30, 2005.
33
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense results from the
depreciation of fixed assets, which consist of computer hardware, furniture and fixtures, and the
amortization of software, capitalized software development costs and leasehold improvements.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $0.7 million or 25.4% to $3.3 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2006 from $2.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. This
increase was attributable to increased depreciation of computer and production hardware. For the
six months ended June 30, 2006, we capitalized $2.2 million of software development costs as
compared to $1.3 million for the comparable period in 2005.
Technology and Communications. Technology and communications expense consists primarily of
costs for our network connections, data center hosting and data feeds provided by outside vendors
and service providers. Technology and communications expense increased by $0.4 million or 11.5% to
$3.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from $3.4 million for the six months ended June
30, 2005. This increase was attributable to increased costs relating to market data and data center
hosting.
Professional and Consulting Fees. Professional and consulting fees consist of fees paid for
accounting and legal fees, information technology and non-information technology consultant costs.
Professional and consulting fees increased by $0.4 million or 8.9% to $5.0 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 from $4.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. This increase
was primarily due to additional audit and tax costs.
Marketing and Advertising. Marketing and advertising expense consists primarily of print and
other advertising expenses we incur to promote our products and services. This expense also
includes costs associated with attending or exhibiting at industry-sponsored seminars, conferences
and conventions. Also included in this expense are travel and entertainment expenses incurred by
our sales force to promote our trading platform and information services. Marketing and advertising
expense decreased by $0.4 million or 33.3% to $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006
from $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. This decrease was primarily due to a
reduction in advertising expenditures.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expense consists primarily of occupancy
and utilities, general travel and entertainment, staff training, board of directors costs and
various state franchise and U.K. value-added taxes. General and administrative expense increased by
$1.3 million or 51.8% to $3.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from $2.5 million for
the comparable period in 2005. This increase was due to an increase in state and local franchise
taxes, travel and entertainment costs and board of directors costs.
Provision for Income Tax
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, we recorded an income tax provision of $0.9 million.
The provision consists principally of $0.4 million in federal
taxes, $0.2 million in state and
local taxes and $0.3 million in foreign taxes.
For the six months ended June 30, 2005, we recorded an income tax provision of $3.3 million.
The provision consists principally of $1.9 million in federal
taxes, $0.7 million in state and
local taxes and $0.6 million in foreign taxes.
For the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, with the exception of the payment of certain
state and local taxes, the provision for income taxes was a non-cash expense since the Company had
available net operating loss carryforwards and tax credits to offset the cash payment of taxes.
Our consolidated effective tax rate can vary from period to period depending on, among other
factors, the geographic and business mix of our earnings.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
On January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS 123R, as disclosed in more detail in Expense Trends in
this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
In January 2006, the Company changed its capitalization policy for furniture, equipment and
leasehold improvements, lowering the threshold for capitalizing such purchases from $10,000 to
$2,000. The change was made to ensure consistency between the financial accounting and tax
treatment for these purchases. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company
capitalized $77,000 and $160,000, respectively that would have been expensed under the old
capitalization policy.
There were no other significant changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates
during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, as compared to those we disclosed in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Segment Results
As an electronic, multi-dealer to client platform for trading fixed-income securities, our
operations constitute a single business segment pursuant to SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. Because of the highly integrated nature of the
financial markets in which we compete and the integration of our worldwide business activities, we
believe that results by geographic region, products or types of clients are not necessarily
meaningful in understanding our business.
34
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our cash flows for the periods presented below were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
612 |
|
|
$ |
3,425 |
|
Net cash (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(8,980 |
) |
|
|
(65,068 |
) |
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
1,620 |
|
|
|
1,659 |
|
Effect of exchange rate differences |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease for the period |
|
$ |
(6,898 |
) |
|
$ |
(60,022 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $0.6 million and $3.4 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Net cash provided by operating activities of $0.6 million for the six months ended June 30,
2006 consisted of net income of $1.9 million, adjusted for non-cash charges, primarily consisting
of $0.2 million of deferred taxes, $3.3 million for depreciation and amortization and $3.3 million
for compensation expense related to issuance of stock options and restricted stock to employees,
directors and consultants. These non-cash charges were offset by a decrease in cash used for
working capital of $8.1 million, primarily as a result of the payment of annual incentive bonuses
of $11.0 million in January 2006.
Net cash provided by operating activities of $3.4 million for the six months ended June 30,
2005 consisted of net income of $4.9 million, adjusted for non-cash charges, primarily consisting
of $2.6 million for depreciation and amortization and $0.8 million for compensation expense related
to issuance of stock options and restricted stock to employees, directors and consultants. These
non-cash charges were offset by a decrease in cash used for working capital of $8.2 million,
primarily as a result of the payment of annual incentive bonuses of $10.9 million in January 2005.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $9.0 million and $65.1 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Net cash used in investing activities of $9.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006
consisted of $44.5 million in purchases of Securities
available-for-sale, purchases of furniture,
equipment and leasehold improvements of $1.9 million and capitalization of software development
costs of $2.2 million, offset by proceeds of $40.0 million
from sales of Securities available-for-sale.
Net cash used in investing activities of $65.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005
consisted of investment of our proceeds from our initial public offering into $65.2 million in
Securities available-for-sale and $4.0 million in Securities held-to-maturity, proceeds from
maturities of short-term investments of $5.8 million, purchases of furniture, equipment and
leasehold improvements of $0.4 million and capitalization of software development costs of $1.4
million.
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was $1.6 million and $1.7 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Financing activities in 2006 and 2005 primarily consisted of proceeds from the exercise of stock
options.
Past trends of cash flows are not necessarily indicative of future cash flow levels. A
decrease in cash flows may have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, business and financial
condition.
Other Factors Influencing Liquidity and Capital Resources
At June 30, 2006, we had Cash and cash equivalents of $51.3 million, a decrease of $6.9
million compared to $58.2 million at December 31, 2005. The decrease in Cash and cash equivalents
is primarily the result of the payment of annual incentive bonuses in January 2006. As of June 30,
2006, Cash and cash equivalents represented 27.1% of our total assets, compared to 30.6% at
December 31, 2005.
We are dependent on our broker-dealer clients, nine of which were also our stockholders as of
January 1, 2006, who are not restricted from buying and selling fixed-income securities, directly
or through their own proprietary or third-party platforms, with institutional investors. None of
our broker-dealer clients is contractually or otherwise obligated to continue to use our electronic
trading platform. The loss of, or a significant reduction in the use of our electronic platform by,
our broker-dealer clients could reduce our cash flows, affect our liquidity and have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We believe that our current resources are adequate to meet our liquidity needs and capital
expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months. However, our future liquidity and capital
requirements will depend on a number of factors, including expenses associated with product
development and expansion and new business opportunities that are intended to further diversify our
revenue stream. We may also acquire or invest in technologies, business ventures or products that
are complementary to our business. In the event we require any additional financing, it will take
the form of equity or debt financing. Any additional equity offerings may result in dilution to our
stockholders. Any
35
debt financings may involve restrictive covenants with respect to dividends, issuances of
additional capital and other financial and operational matters related to our business.
Our two major operating subsidiaries are MarketAxess Corporation and MarketAxess Europe
Limited. MarketAxess Corporation is a registered broker-dealer in the U.S. and MarketAxess Europe
Limited is a registered alternative trading system in the U.K. As such, they are subject to minimum
regulatory capital requirements imposed by their respective market regulators that are intended to
ensure general financial soundness and liquidity based on certain minimum capital requirements. The
U.S. and the U.K. regulations prohibit a registered broker-dealer from repaying borrowings from its
parent or affiliates, paying cash dividends, making loans to its parent or affiliates or otherwise
entering into transactions that result in a significant reduction in its regulatory net capital
position without prior notification to or approval from its principal regulator. The capital
structures of our broker-dealer subsidiaries are designed to provide each with capital and
liquidity consistent with its business and regulatory requirements. As of June 30, 2006,
MarketAxess Corporation had net capital of $10.0 million, which was $9.4 million in excess of its
required minimum net capital of $0.6 million. MarketAxess Europe Limited had financial resources,
as defined by the FSA, of $13.9 million, which was $10.1 million in excess of its required
financial resources of $3.8 million.
In the ordinary course of business, we enter into contracts that contain a variety of
representations, warranties and general indemnifications. Our maximum exposure from any claims
under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve claims that have not yet occurred.
However, based on past experience, we expect the risk of loss to be remote.
Effects of Inflation
Because the majority of our assets are liquid in nature, they are not significantly affected
by inflation. However, the rate of inflation may affect our expenses, such as employee
compensation, office leasing costs and communications expenses, which may not be readily
recoverable in the prices of our services. To the extent inflation results in rising interest rates
and has other adverse effects on the securities markets, it may adversely affect our financial
position and results of operations.
36
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk is the risk of loss resulting from adverse changes in market rates and prices,
such as interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk represents our exposure to interest rate changes with respect to the money
market instruments and U.S. Treasury obligations in which we invest. We do not maintain an
inventory of bonds that are traded on our platform and, except as described below and certain other
limited exceptions, we do not act as principal to the bond transactions completed on our platform.
Our investment income from money market instruments, U.S. Treasury obligations and various
securities was $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006. Fluctuations in investment
income are attributable to changes in our cash balances or holdings of U.S. Treasury securities and
fluctuations in interest rates received on those balances or securities.
Derivative Risk
Our limited derivative risk stems from our activities in the foreign currency forward contract
market. We use this market to mitigate our U.S. dollar versus Pound Sterling exposure that arises
from the activities of our U.K. subsidiaries. As of June 30, 2006, the notional value of our
foreign currency forward contracts was $16.1 million with an unrealized loss of $0.1 million. We do
not speculate in any derivative instruments.
Principal Transaction Risk
Through our subsidiary, MarketAxess Corporation, we began executing riskless principal
transactions between our broker-dealer clients in June 2006, in which we act as an intermediary by
serving as counterparty to both a buyer and a seller in matching back-to-back trades. These
transactions are then settled through a third-party clearing organization. Settlement typically
occurs within one to three trading days after the trade date. Cash settlement of the transaction
occurs upon receipt or delivery of the underlying instrument that was traded.
Riskless principal transactions expose us to risks. In executing riskless principal
transactions, we are exposed to the risk that one of the counterparties to a transaction may fail
to fulfill its obligations to settle a trade. Adverse movements in the prices of securities that
are the subject of these transactions can increase our risk.
Where the unmatched position or failure to deliver is prolonged there may also be regulatory
capital charges required to be taken by us.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management, including the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures, (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act)); as of June 30, 2006. Based on
that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the
disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by MarketAxess in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms, and to ensure that information is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There were no changes in our
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f) and Rule 15d-15(f) under
the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended June 30, 2006 identified in connection with the
evaluation thereof by our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
37
PART II Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings. We may be subject to various
claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Risks that could have a negative impact on our business, results of operations and financial
condition include: our dependence on our broker-dealer clients, nine of which were also our
stockholders as of January 1, 2006; the level and intensity of competition in the fixed-income
electronic trading industry and the pricing pressures that may result; the variability of our
growth rate; our limited operating history; the level of trading volume transacted on the
MarketAxess platform; potential fluctuations in our operating results which may cause our stock
price to decline; the absolute level and direction of interest rates and the corresponding
volatility in the corporate fixed-income market; our ability to develop new products and offerings
and the markets acceptance of those products; technology failures, security breaches or rapid
technology changes that may harm our business; our ability to enter into strategic alliances and to
acquire other businesses and successfully integrate them with our business; extensive government
regulation; continuing international expansion that may present economic and regulatory challenges;
and our future capital needs and our ability to obtain capital when needed. This list is intended
to identify only certain of the principal factors that could have a material adverse impact on our
business, results of operations and financial condition. A more detailed description of each of
these and other important risk factors can be found under the caption Risk Factors in our most
recent Form 10-K, filed on March 14, 2006.
Except as noted below, there have been no material changes to the risk factors described in
the Form 10-K:
We are exposed to risks resulting from non-performance by counterparties to transactions executed
between our broker-dealer clients in which we act as an intermediary in matching back-to back
trades.
In June 2006, we began executing riskless principal transactions between our broker-dealer
clients through our subsidiary, MarketAxess Corporation. We act as an intermediary in these
transactions by serving as counterparty to both the buyer and the seller in matching back-to-back
trades, which are then settled through a third-party clearing organization. Settlement typically
occurs within one to three trading days after the trade date. Cash settlement of the transaction
occurs upon receipt or delivery of the underlying instrument that was traded.
We are exposed to credit risk in our role as trading counterparty to our broker-dealer clients
executing trades on the DealerAxess platform. We are exposed to the risk that third parties that
owe us money, securities or other assets will not perform their obligations. These parties may
default on their obligations to us due to bankruptcy, lack of liquidity, operational failure or
other reasons. Adverse movements in the prices of securities that are the subject of these
transactions can increase our risk. Where the unmatched position or failure to deliver is
prolonged there may also be regulatory capital charges required to be taken by us. The policies
and procedures we use to manage this credit risk are new and untested. There can be no assurance
that these policies and procedures will effectively mitigate our exposure to credit risk.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
A total of 19,829,116 of the Companys shares of common stock were present or represented by
proxy at the Companys Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on June 7, 2006 (the 2006 Annual
Meeting). This represented more than 78% of the Companys shares of common stock outstanding. The
following management proposals were voted upon at the 2006 Annual Meeting and all were approved:
38
Proposal 1 Election of Directors.
The results were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director Nominee |
|
For |
|
Against |
Richard M. McVey |
|
|
19,453,053 |
|
|
|
376,073 |
|
Stephen P. Casper |
|
|
19,256,638 |
|
|
|
572,478 |
|
David G. Gomach |
|
|
19,255,038 |
|
|
|
574,078 |
|
Carlos M. Hernandez |
|
|
19,583,264 |
|
|
|
245,852 |
|
Ronald M. Hersch |
|
|
19,583,264 |
|
|
|
245,852 |
|
Wayne D. Lyski |
|
|
19,019,979 |
|
|
|
809,137 |
|
Jerome S. Markowitz |
|
|
19,256,538 |
|
|
|
572,578 |
|
Nicolas S. Rohatyn |
|
|
19,019,879 |
|
|
|
809,237 |
|
John Steinhardt |
|
|
19,583,164 |
|
|
|
245,952 |
|
Proposal 2 Ratification of an amendment and restatement of the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan
increasing the number of shares that may be subject to awards thereunder by 6,670,000 shares.
The results were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
11,855,662 |
|
|
7,970,639 |
|
|
|
2,815 |
|
Proposal 3 Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Companys
independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
18,625,989 |
|
|
346,004 |
|
|
|
857,123 |
|
Item 5. Other Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit Listing
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
31.1
|
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange
Act Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange
Act Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
39
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the registrant has
duly caused this Form 10-Q to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 7, 2006
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ RICHARD M. MCVEY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard M. McVey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(principal executive officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 7, 2006
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ JAMES N.B. RUCKER |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James N. B. Rucker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(principal financial and accounting officer) |
|
|
40