Form 10-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2010.
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO .
Commission File No. 0-13375
LSI INDUSTRIES INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
10000 Alliance Road
Cincinnati, Ohio 45242
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
IRS Employer I.D.
No. 31-0888951 |
(513) 793-3200
(Telephone number of principal executive offices)
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
|
|
Common shares, no par value
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
(NASDAQ Global Select Market) |
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of December 31, 2009, the aggregate market value of the registrants common stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $159,904,000 based upon a closing sale price of
$7.88 per share as reported on The NASDAQ Global Select Market.
At August 27, 2010 there were 24,038,675 no par value Common Shares issued and outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrants Proxy Statement filed with the Commission for its 2010 Annual Meeting
of Shareholders are incorporated by reference in Part III, as specified.
LSI INDUSTRIES INC.
2010 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
This Form 10-K contains certain forward-looking statements that are subject to numerous
assumptions, risks or uncertainties. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may be
identified by words such as estimates, anticipates, projects, plans, expects,
intends, believes, seeks, may, will, should or the negative versions of those words
and similar expressions, and by the context in which they are used. Such statements, whether
expressed or implied, are based upon current expectations of the Company and speak only as of
the date made. Actual results could differ materially from those contained in or implied by
such forward-looking statements as a result of a variety of risks and uncertainties over which
the Company may have no control. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to,
the impact of competitive products and services, product demand and market acceptance risks,
potential costs associated with litigation and regulatory compliance, reliance on key customers,
financial difficulties experienced by customers, the cyclical and seasonal nature of our
business, the adequacy of reserves and allowances for doubtful accounts, fluctuations in
operating results or costs whether as a result of uncertainties inherent in tax and accounting
matters or otherwise, unexpected difficulties in integrating acquired businesses, the ability to
retain key employees of acquired businesses, unfavorable economic and market conditions, the
results of asset impairment assessments and the other risk factors that are identified herein.
You are cautioned to not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. In addition
to the factors described in this paragraph, the risk factors identified in our Form 10-K and
other filings the Company may make with the SEC constitute risks and uncertainties that may
affect the financial performance of the Company and are incorporated herein by reference. The
Company does not undertake and hereby disclaims any duty to update any forward-looking
statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.
PART I
Our Company
We are a leading provider of comprehensive corporate visual image solutions through the
combination of extensive screen and digital graphics capabilities, a wide variety of high quality
indoor and outdoor lighting products, and related professional services. We also provide graphics
and lighting products and professional services on a stand-alone basis. Our company is the leading
provider of corporate visual image solutions to the petroleum/convenience store industry. We use
this leadership position to penetrate national retailers and multi-site retailers, including quick
service and casual restaurants, eyewear chains, retail chain stores and automobile dealerships
located primarily in the United States. In addition, we are a leading provider of digital
solid-state LED (light emitting diode) video screens and LED specialty lighting to such markets or
industries as sports stadiums and arenas, digital billboards, and entertainment. We design and
develop all aspects of the solid-state LED video screens and lighting, from the electronic circuit
board, to the software to drive and control the LEDs, to the structure of the LED product.
Our focus on product development and innovation creates products that are essential components
of our customers corporate visual image strategy. We develop and manufacture lighting, graphics
and solid-state LED video screen and lighting products and distribute them through an extensive
multi-channel distribution network that allows us to effectively service our target markets.
Representative customers include BP, Chevron Texaco, 7-Eleven, ExxonMobil, Shell, Burger King,
Dairy Queen, Taco Bell, Wendys, Best Buy, CVS Caremark, Target Stores, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.,
Chrysler, Ford, General Motors, Nissan, and Toyota. We service our customers at the corporate,
franchise and local levels.
We believe that national retailers and niche market companies are increasingly seeking
single-source suppliers with the project management skills and service expertise necessary to
execute a comprehensive visual image program. The integration of our graphics, lighting,
technology and professional services capabilities allows our customers to outsource to us the
development of an entire visual image program from the planning and design stage through
installation. Our approach is to combine standard, high-production lighting products, custom
graphics applications and professional services to create complete customer-focused visual image
solutions. We also offer products and services on a stand-alone basis to service our existing
image solutions customers, to establish a presence in a new market or to create a relationship with
a new customer. We believe that our ability to combine graphics and lighting products and
professional services into a comprehensive visual image solution differentiates us from our
competitors who offer only stand-alone products for lighting or graphics and who lack professional
services offerings. During the past several years, we have continued to enhance our ability to
provide comprehensive corporate visual image solutions by adding additional graphics capabilities,
lighting products, LED video screens, LED lighting products and professional services through
acquisitions and internal development.
- 1 -
Our business is organized as follows: the Lighting Segment, which represented 63% of our
fiscal 2010 net sales; the Graphics Segment, which represented 27% of our fiscal 2010 net sales;
the Technology Segment, which represented 2% of our fiscal 2010 net sales; the Electronic
Components Segment, which represented 6% of our fiscal 2010 net sales; and an All Other Category,
which represented 2% of our fiscal 2010 net sales. Our most significant market, which includes
sales of both the Lighting Segment and the Graphics Segment, is the petroleum / convenience store
market with approximately 35%, 23%, and 28% of total net sales concentrated in this market in the
fiscal years ended June 30, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. See Note 2 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page F-32 of this Form 10-K for additional
information on business segments. Net sales by segment are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Lighting Segment |
|
$ |
159,105 |
|
|
$ |
160,475 |
|
|
$ |
183,694 |
|
Graphics Segment |
|
|
68,395 |
|
|
|
60,765 |
|
|
|
85,244 |
|
Technology Segment |
|
|
4,505 |
|
|
|
4,576 |
|
|
|
9,136 |
|
Electronic Components
Segment |
|
|
16,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Category |
|
|
6,281 |
|
|
|
7,983 |
|
|
|
27,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Sales |
|
$ |
254,402 |
|
|
$ |
233,799 |
|
|
$ |
305,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lighting Segment
Our lighting segment manufactures and markets outdoor and indoor lighting for the commercial,
industrial and multi-site retail markets, including the petroleum / convenience store market. Our
products are designed and manufactured to provide maximum value and meet the high-quality,
competitively-priced product requirements of our niche markets. We generally avoid specialty or
custom-designed, low-volume products for single order opportunities. We do, however, design
proprietary products used by our national account customers in large volume, and occasionally also
provide custom products for large, specified projects. Our concentration is on our high-volume,
standard product lines that meet our customers needs. By focusing our product offerings, we
achieve significant manufacturing and cost efficiencies.
Our lighting fixtures, poles and brackets are produced in a variety of designs, styles and
finishes. Important functional variations include types of mounting, such as pole, bracket and
surface, and the nature of the light requirement, such as down-lighting, wall-wash lighting, canopy
lighting, flood-lighting, area lighting and security lighting. Our engineering staff performs
photometric analyses, wind load safety studies for all light fixtures and also designs our fixtures
and lighting systems. Our lighting products utilize a wide variety of different light sources,
including high-intensity discharge metal-halide, fluorescent, and solid-state LED. The major
products and services offered within our lighting segment include: exterior area lighting,
interior lighting, canopy lighting, landscape lighting, LED lighting, light poles, lighting
analysis and photometric layouts. All of our products are designed for performance, reliability,
ease of installation and service, as well as attractive appearance. The Company also has a focus
on designing lighting system solutions and implementing strategies related to energy savings in
substantially all markets served.
We offer our customers expertise in developing and utilizing high-performance LED color and
white lightsource solutions for our Lighting, Graphics and Technology applications, which, when
combined with the Companys lighting fixture expertise and technology has the potential to result
in a broad spectrum of white light LED fixtures that offer equivalent or improved lighting
performance with significant energy and maintenance savings as compared to the present metal halide
and fluorescent lighting fixtures.
The $1.4 million or 0.9% decrease in Lighting Segment net sales in fiscal 2010 is primarily
the net result of an $18.4 million or 18.9% decrease in commissioned net sales to the commercial
and industrial lighting market, partially offset by a $17.0 million or 27.0% increase in lighting
sales to our niche markets of petroleum / convenience stores, automotive dealerships, and retail
national accounts (7-Eleven, Inc. represented an increase of approximately $19.5 million as it
replaced traditional lighting with solid-state LED lighting). Fiscal 2010 Lighting Segment net
sales to the petroleum / convenience store market were approximately $51,462,000, representing 32%
of total Lighting net sales. White light solid-state LED light fixtures represent a growth area
for the Company, with fiscal 2010 Lighting Segment LED sales of approximately $37,800,000
(approximately 24% of total Lighting Segment net sales) up 496% from the prior year.
- 2 -
The $23.2 million or 12.6% decrease in Lighting Segment net sales in fiscal 2009 was primarily
the result of a $13.3 million or 17% net decrease in lighting sales to our niche markets (petroleum
/
convenience stores, automotive dealerships, and quick service restaurants) and national retail
accounts, and a $9.9 million or 9.2% decrease in commissioned net sales to the commercial /
industrial lighting market. Fiscal 2009 Lighting Segment net sales to the petroleum / convenience
store market were approximately $30,279,000, representing 19% of total Lighting net sales. White
light solid-state LED light fixtures represent a growth area for the Company, with such fiscal 2009
Lighting Segment sales of approximately $6,340,000 (approximately 4% of total Lighting Segment net
sales).
Graphics Segment
The Graphics Segment manufactures and sells exterior and interior visual image elements
related to graphics. These products are used in graphics displays and visual image programs in
several markets, including the petroleum/convenience store market and multi-site retail operations.
Our extensive lighting and graphics expertise, product offering, visual image solution
implementation capabilities and other professional services represent significant competitive
advantages. We work with corporations and design firms to establish and implement cost effective
corporate visual image programs. Increasingly, we have become the primary supplier of exterior and
interior graphics for our customers. We also offer installation or installation management
(utilizing pre-qualified independent subcontractors throughout the United States) services for
those customers who require the installation of interior or exterior graphics products.
Our business can be significantly impacted by participation in a customers image conversion
program, especially if it were to involve a roll out of that new image to a significant number
of that customers and its franchisees retail sites. The impact to our business can be very
positive with growth in net sales and profitability when we are engaged in an image conversion
program. This can be followed in subsequent periods by lesser amounts of business or negative
comparisons following completion of an image conversion program, unless we are successful in
replacing that completed business with participation in a new image conversion program of similar
size with one or more customers. An image conversion program can potentially involve any or all of
the following improvements, changes or refurbishments at a customers retail site: interior or
exterior lighting (see discussion above about our lighting segment), interior or exterior store
signage and graphics, and installation of these products in both the prototype and roll out phases
of their program. We believe our retail customers are implementing image conversions on a more
frequent basis than in the past in order to maintain a safe, fresh look or new image on their site
in order to continue to attract customers to their site, and maintain or grow their market share.
However, this trend has slowed down during this recessionary period.
The major products and services offered within our Graphics Segment include the following:
signage and canopy graphics, pump dispenser graphics, building fascia graphics, decals, interior
signage and marketing graphics, aisle markers, wall mural graphics, fleet graphics, prototype
program graphics, installation services for graphics products and solid state LED video screens for
the sports and advertising markets.
The $7.6 million or 12.6% increase in Graphics Segment net sales in fiscal 2010 is primarily
the result of image conversion programs and sales to ten petroleum / convenience store customers
($16.1 million net increase), and the LED video sports screen market ($0.2 million increase).
These increases were partially offset by the following decreases: a grocery retailer ($5.1 million
decrease); five retail customers ($1.2 million net decrease); a national drug store retailer ($0.7
million decrease); a lawn care company ($0.4 million decrease); and changes in volume or completion
of several other graphics programs. Fiscal 2010 Graphics Segment net sales to the petroleum /
convenience store market were approximately $38,490,000, representing 56% of total Graphics net
sales. Graphics Segment net sales related to LED products and installation totaled approximately
$20,275,000 (approximately 30% of total Graphics Segment net sales).
- 3 -
The $24.5 million or 28.7% decrease in Graphics Segment net sales in fiscal 2009 was primarily
the result of completion of programs for certain graphics customers, including an image conversion
program for a national drug store retailer ($4.3 million decrease), two petroleum / convenience
store customers programs ($25.7 million decrease), reductions of net sales to ten other petroleum
/ convenience store customers ($7.0 million decrease) and changes in volume or completion of other
graphics programs. These decreases were partially offset by increased net sales to certain other
customers, including a reimaging program for a grocery customer ($8.9 million increase), and sales
of solid-state LED video screens for sports markets ($5.7 million increase). Fiscal 2009 Graphics
Segment net sales to the petroleum / convenience store market were approximately $24,295,000,
representing 40% of total Graphics net sales. Graphics Segment net sales related to LED products
and installation totaled approximately $8,014,000 (approximately 13% of total Graphics Segment net
sales).
Technology Segment
The Technology Segment, which is LSI Saco Technologies in Montreal, Canada, operates as a
worldwide leader and pioneer in the design, production, and support of high-performance light
engines and large format video screens using LED technology. LSI Saco Technologies offers its
customers expertise in developing and utilizing high-performance LED color and white lightsource
solutions for both lighting and graphics applications. This technology generated development in
the Companys Lighting Segment of a broad spectrum of white light LED fixtures that offer
equivalent or improved lighting performance with significant energy and maintenance savings as
compared to the traditional metal halide and fluorescent lighting fixtures. Additionally, this LED
technology is used in the Companys Graphics Segment to light, accent and provide color lighting to
graphics display and visual image programs of the Companys retail, quick service restaurant and
sports market customers.
The $0.1 million or 1.6% decrease in Technology Segment net sales in fiscal 2010 relates
primarily to decreased net sales of LED video screens to the entertainment market ($0.3 million)
and decreased net sales of specialty LED lighting (0.1 million), partially offset by increased net
sales to other customers. The $4.6 million or 50% decrease in Technology Segment net sales in
fiscal 2009 related primarily to decreased sales of solid-state LED video screens for the sports
and advertising markets ($3.0 million) and decreased sales of specialty LED lighting ($2.1
million), partially offset by increased sales of solid-state LED video screens to the entertainment
market ($0.8 million).
Electronic Components Segment
The Electronic Components Segment was created on July 22, 2009 when the Company acquired AdL
Technology Inc., which it renamed LSI ADL Technology, at a total purchase price of $15.8 million.
The new subsidiary has continued to operate in Columbus, Ohio to design, engineer and manufacture
custom designed electronic circuit boards, assemblies and sub-assemblies used in various
applications including the control of solid-state LED lighting. The Company acquired AdL
Technology as a vertical integration of circuit boards for LED lighting as well as the Companys
other LED product lines such as digital scoreboards, advertising ribbons and billboards. LSI ADL
Technology allows the Company to stay on the leading edge of product development, while at the same
time providing opportunities to drive down manufacturing costs and control delivery of key
components.
Net sales of the Electronic Components Segment were $16,116,000 in fiscal year 2010. In
addition to these customer sales, the Electronic Components Segment also supplied a significant
amount of products to both the Lighting and Graphics Segments.
All Other Category
The All Other Category includes the results of all LSI operations that are not able to be
aggregated into one of the four reportable business segments. Operating results of LSI Marcole,
LSI Adapt, LSI Images as well as Corporate Administrative expenses are included in the All Other
Category. The major products and services offered by operations included in the All Other Category
include: electrical wire harnesses (for LSIs light fixtures and for the white goods or appliance
industry); exterior and interior menu board systems primarily for the quick service restaurant
market; and surveying, permitting and installation management services related to products of the
Graphics Segment.
- 4 -
Fiscal 2010 net sales of $6,281,000 decreased $1.7 million or 21.3% from the prior year
primarily as the net result of decreased net sales to two quick service restaurant menu board
customers ($0.8 million), decreased sales of electrical wire harnesses ($1.0 million) and changes
in volume or completion of other customer programs. The Company sold its wire harness operation
and business at the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2010 and will therefore have no further
sales of wire harnesses. Fiscal 2009 net sales of $7,983,000 decreased $19.2 million or 71% from
the prior fiscal year primarily as a net result of one menu board conversion program that was
completed in fiscal 2008 ($19.8 million decrease).
Goodwill and Intangible Asset Impairment
In fiscal 2010, we recorded a $153,000 non-cash intangible asset impairment charge. Due to
declining use of a trade name and a reduced outlook of future net sales, we determined that a trade
name with a $137,000 carrying value in the Technology Segment was fully impaired. Additionally the
Lighting Segment no longer sells a certain product that supported a $16,000 patent intangible
asset, therefore it was fully impaired.
In fiscal 2009, we recorded a $14,467,000 non-cash goodwill impairment charge. Charges
totaling $11,185,000 were recorded in the Lighting Segment, charges totaling $716,000 were recorded
in the Graphics Segment, and charges in the amount of $2,566,000 were recorded in the All Other
Category. Impairment tests conducted in three of the four fiscal quarters indicated there were
full or partial impairments of goodwill in one of our reporting units in our Lighting Segment, one
reporting unit in the Graphics Segment and one reporting unit in our All Other Category due to the
combination of a decline in the market capitalization of the Company at certain quarter-end balance
sheet dates and a decline in the estimated forecasted discounted cash flows which management
attributes to a weaker economic cycle impacting certain of our customers, notably national
retailers.
Our Competitive Strengths
Single Source Comprehensive Visual Image Solution Provider. We believe that we are the only
company serving our target markets that combines significant graphics capabilities, lighting
products and installation implementation capabilities to create comprehensive image solutions. We
believe that our position as a single-source provider creates a competitive advantage over
competitors who can only address either the lighting or the graphics component of a customers
corporate visual image program. Using our broad visual image solutions capabilities, our customers
can maintain complete control over the creation of their visual image programs while avoiding the
added complexity of coordinating separate lighting and graphics suppliers and service providers.
We can use high technology software to produce computer-generated virtual prototypes of a
customers new or improved retail site image. We believe that these capabilities are unique to our
target markets and they allow our customers to make educated, cost-effective decisions quickly.
Proven Ability to Penetrate Target Markets. We have grown our business by establishing a
leadership position in the majority of our target markets as defined by our revenues, including
petroleum/convenience stores, automobile dealerships and specialty retailers. Although our
relationship with our customers may begin with the need for a single product or service, we
leverage our broad product and service offering to identify additional products and solutions. We
combine existing graphics, lighting and image element offerings, develop products and add services
to create comprehensive solutions for our customers.
- 5 -
Product Development Focus. We believe that our ability to successfully identify and develop
new products has allowed us to expand our market opportunity and enhance our market position. Our
product development initiatives are designed to increase the value of our product offering by
addressing the needs of our customers and target markets through innovative retrofit enhancements
to existing products or the development of new products. In addition, we believe our product
development process creates value for our customers by producing products that offer energy efficiency, low
maintenance requirements and long-term operating performance at competitive prices based upon the
latest technologies available.
Strong Relationships with our Customers. We have used our innovative products and
high-quality services to develop close, long-standing relationships with a large number of our
customers. Many of our customers are recognized among the leaders in their respective markets,
including customers such as BP, 7-Eleven, Chevron, CVS Caremark and Burger King. Their use of our
products and services raises the visibility of our capabilities and facilitates the acceptance of
our products and services in their markets. Within each of these markets, our ability to be a
single source provider of image solutions often creates repeat business opportunities through
corporate reimaging programs. We have served some of our customers since our inception in 1976.
Well-capitalized Balance Sheet. As part of our long-term operating strategy, we believe the
Company maintains a conservative capital structure. With a strong equity base, we are able to
preserve operating flexibility in times of industry expansion and contraction. In the current
business environment, a strong balance sheet demonstrates financial viability to our existing and
targeted customers. In addition, a strong balance sheet enables us to continue important R&D and
capital spending.
Aggressive Use of Our Image Center Capabilities. Our image center capabilities provide us
with a distinct competitive advantage to demonstrate the effectiveness of integrating graphics and
lighting into a complete corporate visual image program. Our technologically advanced image
centers, which demonstrate the depth and breadth of our product and service offerings, have become
an effective component of our sales process.
Maintain our Vertically Integrated Business Model. We consider our company to be a vertically
integrated manufacturer rather than a product assembler. We focus on developing unique
customer-oriented products, solutions and technology, and outsource certain non-core processes and
product components as necessary.
Sales, Marketing and Customers
Our lighting products are sold primarily throughout the United States, but also in Canada,
Australia and Latin America (about 3% of total net sales are outside the United States) using a
combination of regional sales managers, independent sales representatives and distributors.
Although in some cases we sell directly to national firms, more frequently we are designated as a
preferred vendor for product sales to customer-owned as well as franchised, licensed and dealer
operations. Our graphics products, which are program-driven, technology products, electronic
components, and products and services sold by operations in the All Other Category are sold
primarily through our own sales force. Our marketing approach and means of distribution vary by
product line and by type of market.
Sales are developed by contacts with national retail marketers, branded product companies,
franchise and dealer operations. In addition, sales are also achieved through recommendations from
local architects, engineers, petroleum and electrical distributors and contractors. Our sales are
partially seasonal as installation of outdoor lighting and graphic systems in the northern states
decreases during the winter months.
- 6 -
Our image center and i-Zone center capabilities are important parts of our sales process. The
image center, unique within the lighting and graphics industry, is a facility that can produce a
computer-generated virtual prototype of a customers facility on a large screen through the
combination of high technology software and audio/visual presentation. The i-Zone center is a
digitally controlled facility containing a large solid-state LED video screen and several displays
that showcase our LED technology and LED products. With these capabilities, our customers can
instantly explore a wide variety of lighting and graphics alternatives to develop consistent day
and nighttime images. These centers give our customers more options, greater control, and more
effective time utilization in the development of lighting, graphics and visual image solutions, all
with much less expense than traditional prototyping. In addition to being cost and time effective
for our customers, we believe that our image center and i-Zone center capabilities result in the
best solution for our customers needs.
The image and i-Zone centers also contain comprehensive indoor and outdoor product display
areas that allow our customers to see many of our products and services in one setting. This aids
our customers in making quick and effective lighting and graphic design decisions through hands-on
product demonstrations and side-by-side comparisons. More importantly, these capabilities allow us
to expand our customers interest from just a single product into other products and solutions. We
believe that our image center and i-Zone center capabilities have further enhanced our position as
a highly qualified outsourcing partner capable of guiding a customer through image alternatives
utilizing our lighting and graphics products and services. We believe this capability
distinguishes us from our competitors and will become increasingly beneficial in attracting
additional customers.
Manufacturing and Operations
We design, engineer and manufacture substantially all of our lighting and graphics products
through a vertically integrated business model. By emphasizing high-volume production of standard
product lines, we achieve significant manufacturing efficiencies. When appropriate, we utilize
alliances with vendors to outsource certain products and assemblies. LED products and related
software are engineered, designed and final-assembled by the Company, while a portion of the
manufacturing has been performed by select qualified vendors. We are not dependent on any one
supplier for any of our component parts.
The principal raw materials and purchased components used in the manufacturing of our products
are steel, aluminum, wire harnesses, sockets, lamps, certain fixture housings, acrylic and glass
lenses, lighting ballasts, inks, various graphics substrates such as decal material and vinyls,
LEDs and electrical components. We source these materials and components from a variety of
suppliers. Although an interruption of these supplies and components could disrupt our operations,
we believe generally that alternative sources of supply exist and could be readily arranged. We
strive to reduce price volatility in our purchases of raw materials and components through
quarterly or annual contracts with certain of our suppliers. Our lighting operations generally
carry relatively small amounts of finished goods inventory, except for certain products that are
stocked to meet quick delivery requirements. Most often, lighting products are made to order and
shipped shortly after they are manufactured. Our graphics operations manufacture custom graphics
products for customers who frequently require us to stock certain amounts of finished goods in
exchange for their commitment to that inventory. Our technology operation carries LED and LED
component inventory due to longer lead times, makes products to order and ships shortly after
assembly is complete. In some Graphics programs, customers also give us a cash advance for the
inventory that we stock for them. Customers purchasing LED video screens routinely give us cash
advances for large projects prior to shipment. Our electronic components operation purchases
electronic components from multiple suppliers and manufactures custom electronic circuit boards.
Most products are made to order and, as a result, this operation does not carry very much finished
goods.
We believe we are a low-cost producer for our types of products, and as such, are in a
position to promote our product lines with substantial marketing and sales activities.
- 7 -
We currently operate out of thirteen manufacturing facilities in seven states and Canada.
During fiscal 2010 we sold a wire harness manufacturing facility and announced our intention to
consolidate our smallest Lighting manufacturing facility into our largest facility. This
consolidation is expected to be completed in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 and will reduce our
number of facilities down to twelve.
Our manufacturing operations are subject to various federal, state and local regulatory
requirements relating to environmental protection and occupational health and safety. We do not
expect to incur material capital expenditures with regard to these matters and believe our
facilities are in compliance with such regulations.
Competition
We experience strong competition in all segments of our business, and in all markets served by
our product lines. Although we have many competitors, some of which have greater financial and
other resources, we do not compete with the same companies across our entire product and service
offerings. We believe product quality and performance, price, customer service, prompt delivery,
and reputation to be important competitive factors.
We have several product and process patents which have been obtained in the normal course of
business. In general, we do not believe that patent protection is critical to our business,
however we do believe that patent protection is important for a few select products.
Additional Information
Our sales are partially seasonal as installation of outdoor lighting and graphic systems in
the northern states lessens during the harshest winter months. We had a backlog of orders, which
we believe to be firm, of $60.5 million and $40.5 million at June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
All orders are believed to be shippable or installed within twelve months. The increase as of June
30, 2010 relates primarily to a $38 million program with 7-Eleven, Inc. to install retrofit
solid-state LED lighting at over 3,000 of its sites in North America.
We have approximately 1,160 full-time and 185 temporary employees as of June 30, 2010. We
offer a comprehensive compensation and benefit program to most employees, including competitive
wages, a discretionary bonus plan, a profit-sharing plan and retirement plan, and a 401(k) savings
plan (for U.S. employees), a non-qualified deferred compensation plan (for certain employees), an
equity compensation plan, and medical and dental insurance.
We file reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and
8-K. You may read and copy any materials filed with the SEC at its public reference room at 100 F.
Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may also obtain that information by calling
the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an internet website that contains reports, proxy and
information statements and other information regarding us. The address of that site is
http://www.sec.gov. Our internet address is http://www.lsi-industries.com. We
make available free of charge through our internet website our annual report on Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports
filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as
reasonably practical after we electronically file them with the SEC. LSI is not including the
other information contained on its website as part of or incorporating it by reference into this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
LSI Industries Inc. is an Ohio corporation, incorporated in 1976.
- 8 -
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider
the following factors which could materially affect our business, financial condition, cash flows
or future results. Any one of these factors could cause the Companys actual results to vary
materially from recent results or from anticipated future results. The risks described below are
not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us
or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition and/or operating results.
The markets in which we operate are subject to competitive pressures that could affect selling
prices, and therefore could adversely affect our operating results.
Our businesses operate in markets that are highly competitive, and we compete on the basis of
price, quality, service and/or brand name across the industries and markets served. Some of our
competitors for certain products, primarily in the Lighting Segment, have greater sales, assets and
financial resources than we have. Some of our competitors are based in foreign countries and have
cost structures and prices in foreign currencies. Accordingly, currency fluctuations could cause
our U.S. dollar-priced products to be less competitive than our competitors products which are
priced in other currencies. Competitive pressures could affect prices we charge our customers or
demand for our products, which could adversely affect our operating results. Additionally,
customers for our products are attempting to reduce the number of vendors from which they purchase
in order to reduce the size and diversity of their inventories and their transaction costs. To
remain competitive, we will need to invest continuously in manufacturing, marketing, customer
service and support, and our distribution networks. We may not have sufficient resources to
continue to make such investments and we may be unable to maintain our competitive position.
Lower levels of economic activity in our end markets could adversely affect our operating
results.
Our businesses operate in several market segments including commercial, industrial, retail,
petroleum / convenience store and entertainment. Operating results can be negatively impacted by
volatility in these markets. Future downturns in any of the markets we serve could adversely
affect our overall sales and profitability.
Our operating results may be adversely affected by unfavorable economic and market
conditions.
Economic conditions worldwide have from time to time contributed to slowdowns in our industry
at large, as well as to the specific segments and markets in which we operate. When combined with
ongoing customer consolidation activity and periodic manufacturing and inventory initiatives, the
current uncertain macro-economic climate, including but not limited to the effects of weakness in
credit markets, could lead to reduced demand from our customers and increased price competition for
our products, increased risk of excess and obsolete inventories and higher overhead costs as a
percentage of revenue. If the markets in which we participate experience further economic
downturns, as well as a slow recovery period, this could negatively impact our sales and revenue
generation, margins and operating expenses, and consequently have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
- 9 -
Price increases or significant shortages of raw materials and components could adversely affect
our operating margin.
The Company purchases large quantities of raw materials and components mainly steel,
aluminum, lighting ballasts, sockets, wire harnesses, plastic, lenses, glass lenses, vinyls, inks,
LEDs, electronic components and corrugated cartons. Materials comprise the largest component of
costs, representing nearly 62% of the cost of sales in both 2010 and 2009. While we have multiple
sources of supply for each of our major requirements, significant shortages could disrupt the
supply of raw materials. Further increases in the price of these raw materials and components
could further increase the Companys operating costs and materially adversely affect margins.
Although the Company attempts to pass along increased costs in the form of price increases to
customers, the Company may be unsuccessful in doing so for competitive reasons. Even when price
increases are successful, the timing of such price increases may lag significantly behind the
incurrence of higher costs. As of August 2010, there are selected electronic component parts and
certain other parts shortages in the market place, some of which have affected the Companys
manufacturing operations and shipment schedules even though multiple suppliers may be available.
The lead times from electronic component suppliers have significantly increased for some component
parts and prices of some of these electronic component parts have increased during this period of
shortages.
We have a concentration of net sales to the petroleum / convenience store market, and any
substantial change in this market could have an adverse affect on our business.
Approximately 35% of our net sales in fiscal year 2010 are concentrated in the petroleum /
convenience store market. Sales to this market segment are dependent upon the general conditions
prevailing in and the profitability of the petroleum and convenience store industries and general
market conditions. Our petroleum market business is subject to reactions by the petroleum industry
to world political events, particularly those in the Middle East, and to the price and supply of
oil. Major disruptions in the petroleum industry generally result in a curtailment of retail
marketing efforts, including expansion and refurbishing of retail outlets, by the petroleum
industry and adversely affect our business. Any substantial change in purchasing decisions by one
or more of our largest customers, whether due to actions by our competitors, customer financial
constraints, industry factors or otherwise, could have an adverse effect on our business.
Difficulties with integrating acquisitions could adversely affect operating costs and expected
benefits from those acquisitions.
We have pursued and may continue to seek potential acquisitions to complement and expand our
existing businesses, increase our revenues and profitability, and expand our markets. We cannot be
certain that we will be able to identify, acquire or profitably manage additional companies or
successfully integrate such additional companies without substantial costs, delays or other
problems. Also, companies acquired recently and in the future may not achieve revenues,
profitability or cash flows that justify our investment in them. We expect to spend significant
time and effort in expanding our existing businesses and identifying, completing and integrating
acquisitions. We expect to face competition for acquisition candidates which may limit the number
of acquisition opportunities available to us, possibly leading to a decrease in the rate of growth
of our revenues and profitability, and may result in higher acquisition prices. The success of
these acquisitions we do make will depend on our ability to integrate these businesses into our
operations. We may encounter difficulties in integrating acquisitions into our operations,
retaining key employees of acquired companies and in managing strategic investments. Therefore, we
may not realize the degree or timing of the benefits anticipated when we first enter into a
transaction.
- 10 -
If acquisitions are made in the future and goodwill and intangible assets are recorded on the
balance sheet, circumstances could arise in which the goodwill and intangible assets could become
impaired and therefore would be written off.
We have pursued and will continue to seek potential acquisitions to complement and expand our
existing businesses, increase our revenues and profitability, and expand our markets through
acquisitions. As a result of acquisitions, we have significant goodwill and intangible assets
recorded on our balance sheet. We will continue to evaluate the recoverability of the carrying
amount of our goodwill and intangible assets on an ongoing basis, and we may incur substantial
non-cash impairment charges, which would adversely affect our financial results. There can be no
assurance that the outcome of such reviews in the future will not result in substantial impairment
charges. Impairment assessment inherently involves judgment as to assumptions about expected
future cash flows and the impact of market conditions on those assumptions. Future events and
changing market conditions may impact our assumptions as to prices, costs, holding periods or other
factors that may result in changes in our estimates of future cash flows. Although we believe the
assumptions we used in testing for impairment are reasonable, significant changes in any one of our
assumptions could produce a significantly different result. If there were to be a decline in our
market capitalization and a decline in estimated forecasted discounted cash flows, there could be
an impairment of the goodwill and intangible assets. A non-cash impairment charge could be
material to the earnings of the reporting period in which it is recorded.
If customers do not accept new products, we could experience a loss of competitive position
which could adversely affect future revenues.
The Company is committed to product innovation on a timely basis to meet customer demands.
Development of new products for targeted markets requires the Company to develop or otherwise
leverage leading technologies in a cost-effective and timely manner. Failure to meet these
changing demands could result in a loss of competitive position and seriously impact future
revenues. Products or technologies developed by others may render the Companys products or
technologies obsolete or noncompetitive. A fundamental shift in technologies in key product
markets could have a material adverse effect on the Companys operating results and competitive
position within the industry. More specifically, the development of new or enhanced products is a
complex and uncertain process requiring the anticipation of technological and market trends. We may
experience design, manufacturing, marketing or other difficulties, such as an inability to attract
a sufficient number of experienced engineers, that could delay or prevent our development,
introduction or marketing of new products or enhancements and result in unexpected expenses. Such
difficulties could cause us to lose business from our customers and could adversely affect our
competitive position. In addition, added expenses could decrease the profitability associated with
those products that do not gain market acceptance.
Our business is cyclical and seasonal, and in downward economic cycles our operating profits
and cash flows could be adversely affected.
Historically, sales of our products have been subject to cyclical variations caused by changes
in general economic conditions. Our revenues in our third quarter ending March 31 are also
affected by the impact of weather on construction and installation programs and the annual budget
cycles of major customers. The demand for our products reflects the capital investment decisions
of our customers, which depend upon the general economic conditions of the markets that our
customers serve, including, particularly, the petroleum and convenience store industries. During
periods of expansion in construction and industrial activity, we generally have benefited from
increased demand for our products. Conversely, downward economic cycles in these industries result
in reductions in sales and pricing of our products, which may reduce our profits and cash flow.
During economic downturns, customers also tend to delay
purchases of new products. The cyclical and seasonal nature of our business could at times
adversely affect our liquidity and financial results.
- 11 -
A loss of key personnel or inability to attract qualified personnel could have an adverse
affect on our operating results.
The Companys future success depends on the ability to attract and retain highly skilled
technical, managerial, marketing and finance personnel, and, to a significant extent, upon the
efforts and abilities of senior management. The Companys management philosophy of cost-control
results in a very lean workforce. Future success of the Company will depend on, among other
factors, the ability to attract and retain other qualified personnel, particularly management,
research and development engineers and technical sales professionals. The loss of the services of
any key employees or the failure to attract or retain other qualified personnel could have a
material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations.
The costs of litigation and compliance with environmental regulations, if significantly
increased, could have an adverse affect on our operating profits.
We are, and may in the future be, a party to any number of legal proceedings and claims,
including those involving patent litigation, product liability, employment matters, and
environmental matters, which could be significant. Given the inherent uncertainty of litigation,
we can offer no assurance that existing litigation or a future adverse development will not have a
material adverse impact. We are also subject to various laws and regulations relating to
environmental protection and the discharge of materials into the environment, and it could
potentially be possible we could incur substantial costs as a result of the noncompliance with or
liability for clean up or other costs or damages under environmental laws.
|
|
|
ITEM 1B. |
|
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS |
None.
The Company has thirteen facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Size |
|
Location |
|
Status |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1)
|
|
LSI Industries Corporate
Headquarters, and
lighting fixture and
graphics manufacturing
|
|
243,000 sq. ft.,
(includes 66,000
sq. ft. of office
space)
|
|
Cincinnati, OH
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2)
|
|
LSI Industries pole
manufacturing and dry
powder-coat painting
|
|
122,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Cincinnati, OH
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3)
|
|
LSI Metal Fabrication
and LSI Images manufacturing and dry
powder-coat painting
|
|
98,000 sq. ft.
(includes 5,000
sq. ft. of office
space)
|
|
Independence, KY
|
|
Owned |
- 12 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Size |
|
Location |
|
Status |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4)
|
|
LSI Integrated Graphics
office; screen printing
manufacturing; and
architectural graphics
manufacturing
|
|
198,000 sq. ft.
(includes 34,000 sq.
ft. of office space)
|
|
Houston, TX
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5)
|
|
Greenlee Lighting office
and manufacturing
|
|
40,000 sq. ft.
(includes 4,000 sq. ft.
of office space)
|
|
Dallas, TX
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6)
|
|
Grady McCauley office
and manufacturing
|
|
210,000 sq. ft.
(includes 20,000
sq. ft. of office space)
|
|
North Canton, OH
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7)
|
|
LSI MidWest Lighting
office and manufacturing
|
|
163,000 sq. ft.
(includes 6,000 sq. ft.
of office space and
27,000 sq. ft. of leased
warehouse space)
|
|
Kansas City, KS
|
|
Owned and
Leased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8)
|
|
LSI Retail Graphics office
and manufacturing
|
|
57,000 sq. ft.
(includes 11,000 sq. ft.
of office space)
|
|
Woonsocket, RI
|
|
Owned (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9)
|
|
LSI Lightron office
and manufacturing
|
|
170,000 sq. ft. (includes
10,000 sq. ft. of office
space)
|
|
New Windsor, NY
|
|
Owned and
Leased (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10)
|
|
LSI Adapt offices
|
|
2,000 sq. ft.
|
|
North Canton, OH
Charlotte, NC
|
|
Owned
Leased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11)
|
|
LSI Saco Technologies
office and manufacturing
|
|
30,000 sq. ft. (includes
7,000 sq. ft. of office
space)
|
|
Montreal, Canada
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12)
|
|
LSI ADL Technology office
and manufacturing
|
|
57,000 sq. ft. (includes
11,000 sq. ft. of office
space)
|
|
Columbus, OH
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
This represents two facilities. |
|
(b) |
|
The land at this facility is leased and the building is owned. |
The Company considers these facilities (total of 1,390,000 square feet) adequate for its
current level of operations.
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
[REMOVED AND RESERVED] |
- 13 -
PART II
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
(a) |
|
Common share information appears in Note 17 SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED) under
Range of share prices beginning on page F-49 of this Form 10-K. Information related to
Earnings (loss) per share and Cash dividends paid per share appears in SELECTED FINANCIAL
DATA on page F-51 of this Form 10-K. LSIs shares of common stock are traded on the NASDAQ
Global Select Market under the symbol LYTS. |
|
|
The Companys policy with respect to dividends, as revised by the Board of Directors in
August 2007, is to pay a quarterly cash dividend representing a payout ratio of between
50% and 70% of the then current fiscal year net income forecast. Accordingly, the
Board of Directors established a new indicated annual cash dividend rate of $0.20 per
share beginning with the first quarter of fiscal 2010 consistent with the above
dividend policy. In addition to the four quarterly dividend payments, the Company may
declare a special year-end cash and/or stock dividend. The Company has paid annual
cash dividends beginning in fiscal 1987 through fiscal 1994, and quarterly cash
dividends since fiscal 1995. |
|
|
At August 18, 2010, there were 502 shareholders of record. The Company believes this
represents approximately 3,000 beneficial shareholders. |
(b) |
|
The Company does not purchase into treasury its own common shares for general purposes.
However, the Company does purchase its own common shares, through a Rabbi Trust, as
investments of employee/participants of the LSI Industries Inc. Non-Qualified Deferred
Compensation Plan. Purchases of Company common shares for this Plan in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2010 were as follows: |
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total Number of |
|
|
(or Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
(a) Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
Value) of Shares that |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
(b) Average |
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
May Yet Be Purchased |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Announced Plans or |
|
|
Under the Plans or |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
Programs |
|
4/1/10 to 4/30/10 |
|
|
422 |
|
|
$ |
6.95 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
5/1/10 to 5/31/10 |
|
|
471 |
|
|
$ |
6.32 |
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
6/1/10 to 6/30/10 |
|
|
462 |
|
|
$ |
5.43 |
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,355 |
|
|
$ |
6.21 |
|
|
|
1,355 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All acquisitions of shares reflected above have been made in connection with the Companys
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, which does not contemplate a limit on shares to be
acquired. |
- 14 -
The following graph compares the cumulative total shareholder return on the Companys Common Shares
during the five fiscal years ended June 30, 2010 with a cumulative total return on the NASDAQ Stock
Market Index (U.S. companies) and the Dow Jones Electrical Equipment Index. The comparison assumes
$100 was invested June 30, 2005 in the Companys Common Shares and in each of the indexes
presented; it also assumes reinvestment of dividends.
The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of
future stock price performance.
|
|
|
ITEM 6. |
|
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
Selected Financial Data begins on page F-51 of this Form 10-K.
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations appears on pages F-1 through F-18 of this Form 10-K.
|
|
|
ITEM 7A. |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in variable interest rates, changes in
prices of raw materials and component parts, and changes in foreign currency translation rates.
Each of these risks is discussed below.
- 15 -
Interest Rate Risk
The Company earns interest income on its cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments
(if any) and pays interest expense on its debt. Because of variable interest rates, the Company is
exposed to the risk of interest rate fluctuations, which impact interest income, interest expense,
and cash flows. With the significant increase in the Companys short-term cash investments and
fourth quarter fiscal 2007 pay down of all variable rate debt, the adverse exposure to interest
rate fluctuations has decreased considerably.
All of the Companys $35,000,000 available lines of credit are subject to interest rate
fluctuations, should the Company borrow on these lines of credit. Additionally, the Company
expects to generate cash from its operations that will subsequently be used to pay down as much of
the debt (if any is outstanding) as possible or invest cash in short-term investments (if no debt
is outstanding), while still funding the growth of the Company.
Raw Material Price Risk
The Company purchases large quantities of raw materials and components, mainly steel,
aluminum, lighting ballasts, sockets, wire harnesses, plastic, lenses, glass, vinyls, inks, LEDs,
electronic components, and corrugated cartons. The Companys operating results could be affected
by the availability and price fluctuations of these materials. The Company uses multiple
suppliers, has alternate suppliers for most materials, and has no significant dependence on any
single supplier. Other than industry-wide electronic component supply shortages, the Company has
not experienced any significant supply problems in recent years. Supply shortages of certain
electronic components and certain other parts in fiscal 2010 has caused some production and
shipment delays, and the Company is dealing with some increased supply chain lead times. Price
risk for these materials is related to increases in commodity items that affect all users of the
materials, including the Companys competitors. For the year ended June 30, 2010, the raw material
component of cost of goods sold subject to price risk was approximately $124 million. The Company
does not actively hedge or use derivative instruments to manage its risk in this area. The Company
does, however, seek new vendors, negotiate with existing vendors, and at times commit to minimum
volume levels to mitigate price increases. The Company negotiates supply agreements with certain
vendors to lock in prices over a negotiated period of time. In response to rising material prices,
the Companys Lighting Segment announced price increases ranging from 4% to 6%, depending on the
product, effective with late June 2010 orders. While competitors of the Companys lighting
business have announced similar price increases, the lighting market remains very price
competitive. The Companys Graphics Segment generally establishes new sales prices, reflective of
the then current raw material prices, for each custom graphics program as it begins.
Foreign Currency Translation Risk
As a result of the operation of a subsidiary in Montreal, Canada, the Company is exposed to
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates in the operation of its Canadian business.
However, a substantial amount of this business is conducted in U.S. dollars, therefore, any
potential risk is deemed immaterial. Additionally, the financial transactions and financial
statements of this subsidiary are recorded in U.S. dollars.
- 16 -
|
|
|
ITEM 8. |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
Index
to Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Begins |
|
|
|
on Page |
|
Financial Statements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Statement Schedules: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-52 |
|
Schedules other than those listed above are omitted for the reason(s) that they are either
not applicable or not required or because the information required is contained in the
financial statements or notes thereto. Selected quarterly financial data is found in NOTE
17 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
ITEM 9. |
|
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
None.
|
|
|
ITEM 9A. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended (the Exchange Act))
that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Companys reports
under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated
to management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company periodically
reviews the design and effectiveness of its disclosure controls and internal control over financial
reporting. The Company makes modifications to improve the design and effectiveness of its
disclosure controls and internal control structure, and may take other corrective action, if its
reviews identify a need for such modifications or actions. The Companys disclosure controls and
procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives.
As of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K, an evaluation was completed under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer
and principal financial officer, regarding the design and effectiveness of our disclosure controls
and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our management, including our principal executive
officer and principal financial officer, has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective as of June 30, 2010.
- 17 -
Changes in Internal Control
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter ended June 30,
2010, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting. See Managements Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting on page F-19.
|
|
|
ITEM 9B. |
|
OTHER INFORMATION |
None.
PART III
ITEMS 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III are incorporated by reference to the LSI Industries Inc.
Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held November 18, 2010, as filed with
the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A.
|
|
|
ITEM 12. |
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
The following table presents information about the Companys equity compensation plans (LSI
Industries Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan, the LSI Industries Inc. 1995 Directors Stock Option Plan
and the 2003 Equity Compensation Plan) as of June 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining available |
|
|
|
Number of securities to |
|
|
(b) |
|
|
for future issuance |
|
|
|
be issued upon |
|
|
Weighted average |
|
|
under equity |
|
|
|
exercise of outstanding |
|
|
exercise price of |
|
|
compensation plans |
|
|
|
options, warrants and |
|
|
outstanding options, |
|
|
(excluding securities |
|
Plan category |
|
rights |
|
|
warrants and rights |
|
|
reflected in column (a)) |
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
|
|
2,123,086 |
|
|
$ |
11.64 |
|
|
|
833,585 |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2,123,086 |
|
|
$ |
11.64 |
|
|
|
833,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART IV
|
|
|
ITEM 15. |
|
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES |
(a) |
|
The following documents are filed as part of this report: |
|
(1) |
|
Consolidated Financial Statements
Appear as part of Item 8 of this Form 10-K. |
- 18 -
|
(2) |
|
Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules
Appear as part of Item 8 of this Form 10-K. |
|
|
(3) |
|
Exhibits Exhibits set forth below are either on file with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and are incorporated by reference as exhibits hereto,
or are filed with this Form 10-K. |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of July 22,
2009 among LSI Industries Inc., LSI Acquisition
Inc., ADL Technology Inc., ADL Engineering Inc.,
and Craig A. Miller, Kevin A. Kelly and David T.
Feeney filed as Exhibit 2.1 to LSIs Form 8-K filed
July 24, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of LSI filed as Exhibit
3.1 to LSIs Form S-3 Registration Statement File
No. 33-65043. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Amended Article Fourth of LSIs Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation filed as Exhibit
3.1 to LSIs Form 8-K filed November 19, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Code of Regulations of LSI
filed as Exhibit 3 to LSIs Form 8-K filed January
22, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Credit Agreement by and among LSI as the Borrower,
the banks party thereto as the lenders thereunder,
PNC Bank National Association as the Administrative
Agent and the Syndication Agent, Dated as of March
30, 2001 filed as Exhibit 4 to LSIs Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2001. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
Amendment No. 6 to Credit Agreement dated January
12, 2007 among the Registrant, PNC Bank, National
Association, in its capacity as Lender and The
Fifth Third Bank filed as Exhibit 10.1 to LSIs
Form 8-K filed January 17, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
Amendment to Credit Agreement dated November 4,
2009 among the Registrant, PNC Bank, National
Association, in the capacity as syndication agent
and administrative agent, PNC Bank, National
Association, in its capacity as lender and Fifth
Third Bank filed as Exhibit 10.1 to LSIs Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
Amendment to Credit Agreement dated March 31, 2010
among the Registrant, PNC Bank, National
Association, in its capacity as syndication agent
and administrative agent, PNC Bank, National
Association, in its capacity as lender and The
Fifth Third Bank filed as Exhibit 10.1 to LSIs
Form
8-K filed March 31, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
Loan Agreement dated January 12, 2007 among The Fifth Third Bank,
LSI Saco Technologies Inc. and LSI, as guarantor, filed as Exhibit
10.2 to LSIs Form 8-K filed January 17, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
Continuing and Unlimited Guaranty Agreement dated January 12, 2007
executed by the Registrant filed as Exhibit 10.3 to LSIs Form 8-K
filed January 17, 2007. |
- 19 -
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
Amendment to Credit Agreement (Dated March 18, 2009) filed as Exhibit
10.1 to LSIs Form 8-K filed March 18, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
First Amendment to Loan Agreement and Guaranty dated as of June 8,
2007 among the Registrant, LSI Saco Technologies Inc., and Fifth Third
Bank filed as Exhibit 10.1 to LSIs Form 8-K filed June 11, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
* |
|
LSI Industries Inc. Retirement Plan (Amended and Restated as of
February 1, 2006) filed as Exhibit 10.9 to LSIs Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10 |
* |
|
Fourth Amendment to the LSI Industries Inc. Retirement Plan (Amended
and Restated as of February 1, 2006) filed as Exhibit 10.10 to LSIs
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.11 |
* |
|
Fifth Amendment to the LSI Industries Inc. Retirement Plan (Amended
and Restated as of February 1, 2006) filed as Exhibit 10 to LSIs Form
10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.12 |
* |
|
LSI Industries Inc. 1995 Directors Stock Option Plan (Amended as of
December 6, 2001) filed as Exhibit 10 to LSIs Form S-8 Registration
Statement File No. 333-100038. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.13 |
* |
|
LSI Industries Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan (Amended as of December 6,
2001) filed as Exhibit 10 to LSIs Form S-8 Registration Statement
File No. 333-100039. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.14 |
* |
|
LSI Industries Inc. 2003 Equity Compensation Plan (Amended and
Restated through November 19, 2009) filed as Exhibit 10.1 to LSIs
Form 8-K filed November 19, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.15 |
* |
|
Trust Agreement Establishing the Rabbi Trust Agreement by and between
LSI Industries Inc. and Prudential Bank & Trust, FSB filed as Exhibit
10.1 to LSIs Form 8-K filed January 5, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.16 |
* |
|
LSI Industries Inc. Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (Amended
and Restated as of November 19, 2009) filed as Exhibit 10.2 to LSIs
Form 8-K filed November 19, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.17 |
* |
|
Amended Agreement dated January 25, 2005 with Robert J. Ready filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to LSIs Form 8-K filed January 27, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.18 |
* |
|
Amended Agreement dated January 25, 2005 with James P. Sferra filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to LSIs Form 8-K filed January 27, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.19 |
* |
|
LSI Industries Inc. FY 2010 Bonus Scorecard filed as Exhibit 99.2 to
LSIs Form 8-K filed January 20, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.20 |
|
|
Escrow Agreement dated as of July 22, 2009 among LSI Acquisition Inc.,
Craig A. Miller, Kevin A. Kelly, David T. Feeney and U.S. Bank,
National Association filed as Exhibit 10.1 to LSIs Form 8-K filed
July 24, 2009. |
- 20 -
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.21 |
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of July 22, 2009 by and between
LSI Industries Inc. and Craig A. Miller, Kevin A. Kelly and David T.
Feeney filed as Exhibit 10.2 to LSIs Form 8-K filed July 24, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
Code of Ethics filed as Exhibit 14 to LSIs Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2004. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Grant
Thornton LLP) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Deloitte &
Touche LLP) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer |
|
|
|
* |
|
Management Compensatory Agreements |
LSI will provide shareholders with any exhibit upon the payment of a specified reasonable fee,
which fee shall be limited to LSIs reasonable expenses in furnishing such exhibit. The exhibits
identified herein as being filed with the SEC have been so filed with the SEC but may not be
included in this version of the Annual Report to Shareholders.
- 21 -
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LSI INDUSTRIES INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BY:
|
|
/s/ Robert J. Ready
Robert J. Ready
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
and President |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
|
/s/ Robert J. Ready
Robert J. Ready
Date: September 8, 2010
|
|
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer, and President
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
/s/ Ronald S. Stowell
Ronald S. Stowell
Date: September 8, 2010
|
|
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and
Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
/s/ Gary P. Kreider
Gary P. Kreider
|
|
Director |
Date: September 8, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Dennis B. Meyer
Dennis B. Meyer
|
|
Director |
Date: September 8, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Wilfred T. OGara
Wilfred T. OGara
|
|
Director |
Date: September 8, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark A. Serrianne
Mark A. Serrianne
|
|
Director |
Date: September 8, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James P. Sferra
James P. Sferra
|
|
Secretary; Executive Vice President
Manufacturing; and Director |
Date: September 8, 2010 |
|
|
- 22 -
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Companys forward looking statements and disclosures as presented earlier in this Form
10-K in the Safe Harbor Statement should be referred to when reading Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Net Sales by Business Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Lighting Segment |
|
$ |
159,105 |
|
|
$ |
160,475 |
|
|
$ |
183,694 |
|
Graphics Segment |
|
|
68,395 |
|
|
|
60,765 |
|
|
|
85,244 |
|
Technology Segment |
|
|
4,505 |
|
|
|
4,576 |
|
|
|
9,136 |
|
Electronic Components Segment |
|
|
16,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Category |
|
|
6,281 |
|
|
|
7,983 |
|
|
|
27,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
254,402 |
|
|
$ |
233,799 |
|
|
$ |
305,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss) by Business Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Lighting Segment |
|
$ |
9,335 |
|
|
$ |
(3,911 |
) |
|
$ |
15,310 |
|
Graphics Segment |
|
|
3,507 |
|
|
|
2,646 |
|
|
|
(14,027 |
) |
Technology Segment |
|
|
(653 |
) |
|
|
(486 |
) |
|
|
(4,876 |
) |
Electronic Components Segment |
|
|
2,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Category |
|
|
(12,559 |
) |
|
|
(12,660 |
) |
|
|
(7,377 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,909 |
|
|
$ |
(14,411 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,970 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary Comments
Fiscal 2010 net sales of $254,402,000 increased $20.6 million or 8.8% as compared to fiscal
2009. Net sales were favorably influenced by increased net sales of the Graphics Segment (up $7.6
million or 12.6%), and the addition of the Electronic Components Segment (effective with the July
22, 2009 acquisition of AdL Technology) which added $16.1 million of net sales. Net sales were
unfavorably influenced by decreased All Other Category net sales (down $1.7 million or 21.3%),
decreased Lighting Segment net sales (down $1.4 million or 0.9%) and decreased Technology Segment
net sales (down $0.1 million or 1.6%). The Company sold its wire harness business in the third
quarter of fiscal 2010 and incurred a pre-tax loss of $639,000 which is included in the operating
loss of the All Other Category. In fiscal 2010, the Company recorded pre-tax intangible asset
impairments of $153,000, as compared to a fiscal 2009 pre-tax goodwill impairments totaling
$14,467,000 see the paragraph below regarding goodwill and intangible asset impairments and the
section below on Non-GAAP Financial Measures. Net sales to the Petroleum / Convenience Store
market, the Companys largest niche market, were $89,952,000 or 35% of total net sales and
$54,574,000 or 23% of total net sales in fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively. The $35.4 million or
65% increase is primarily due to a program with 7-Eleven, Inc., who is replacing traditional
canopy, site and sign lighting with solid-state LED lighting ($36.6 million increase). The Company
expects to substantially complete the conversion to solid-state LED lighting at the remaining
approximately 2,800 non-petroleum retail sites by the end of calendar 2010. Net sales to this
petroleum / convenience store customer are reported in both the Lighting and Graphics segments.
F-1
The Company recorded intangible asset impairment expenses in fiscal 2010 totaling $153,000
($16,000 in the Lighting Segment and $137,000 in the Technology Segment). There were no such
intangible asset impairment expenses in fiscal 2009. The Company recorded significant goodwill
impairment expenses in fiscal 2009 totaling $14,467,000 ($11.2 million in the Lighting Segment,
$0.7 million in the Graphics Segment and $2.6 million in the All Other Category). There were no
such goodwill impairment expenses in fiscal 2010.
The Company also recorded significant acquisition-related and other professional fees expenses
in fiscal 2010, totaling $1,198,000 ($678,000 of inventory adjustments related to acquisition fair
value accounting on the opening balance sheet of LSI ADL Technology; and $520,000 of acquisition
transaction costs related to the acquisition of LSI ADL Technology). There were no such similar
significant expenses in fiscal 2009. See also the section below on Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
The Companys total net sales of products and services related to solid-state LED technology
in light fixtures and video screens for sports, advertising and entertainment markets have been
recorded as indicated in the table below. In addition, the Company sells certain elements of
graphic identification programs that contain solid-state LED light sources.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2010 |
|
|
FY 2009 |
|
|
% Increase |
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
17,999 |
|
|
$ |
8,798 |
|
|
|
105 |
% |
Second Quarter |
|
|
18,533 |
|
|
|
2,784 |
|
|
|
566 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Half |
|
|
36,532 |
|
|
|
11,582 |
|
|
|
215 |
% |
Third Quarter |
|
|
11,510 |
|
|
|
3,086 |
|
|
|
273 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
48,042 |
|
|
|
14,668 |
|
|
|
228 |
% |
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
14,538 |
|
|
|
4,262 |
|
|
|
241 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full Year |
|
$ |
62,580 |
|
|
$ |
18,930 |
|
|
|
231 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As fiscal 2010 progressed, the Company continued to encounter the effects of a global economic
recession with significant negative economic forces, including declining industrial production,
rapidly increasing unemployment, roller coaster commodity pricing, and record low confidence
levels, as well as issues such as malfunctioning credit markets which could affect many customers
and a decimated housing market that indirectly could affect the Companys business. Taken as a
whole, these factors continue to cause a substantial reduction in demand for our lighting and
graphics products. Virtually all of our markets have been adversely impacted and our business has
suffered as a result. During these difficult and uncertain economic conditions, we continue to
take a number of proactive steps to right size LSI Industries to meet todays challenges. Such
actions include strict control of expenses, capital expenditure reductions, close management of
accounts receivable and inventories, headcount reductions, and maintaining a conservative financial
position coupled with positive free cash flow. We believe the economy will continue to improve
even though the time frame for such improvement is uncertain at this time. As we continue to
adjust our expense levels to lower production rates and manage working capital efficiently, we are
also strategically positioning the business for future growth and are very positive about the
longer term outlook and opportunities for the Company, notwithstanding the current economic
conditions that will likely continue to impact results during the next several quarters. LSI is
still facing a period of challenging business conditions in the near term due to the general
economic conditions, but expects to emerge a stronger and more efficient company as business
conditions improve.
F-2
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
The Company believes it is appropriate to evaluate its performance after making adjustments to
the U.S. GAAP net income (loss) for the 2010 and 2009 fiscal years. Adjusted net income and
earnings per share, which exclude the loss on the sale of LSI Marcole, goodwill and intangible
asset impairments, a loss contingency related to a menu board patent litigation, and the impact of
the LSI ADL Technology acquisition deal costs and acquisition-related fair value inventory
adjustments, are non-GAAP financial measures. We believe that these adjusted supplemental measures
are useful in assessing the operating performance of our business. These supplemental measures are
used by our management, including our chief operating decision maker, to evaluate business results.
We exclude these items because they are not representative of the ongoing results of operations of
our business. Below is a reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to net income (loss) for the
periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2010 |
|
|
FY 2009 |
|
|
FY 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
(In thousands, except per share data; unaudited) |
|
Amount |
|
|
EPS |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
EPS |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
EPS |
|
Reconciliation of net income (loss) to
adjusted net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) as reported |
|
$ |
1,424 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
(13,414 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.62 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,048 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.60 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment for the loss on sale of
LSI Marcole, inclusive of the
income tax effect |
|
|
422 |
(1) |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment for the acquisition
deal costs and acquisition-related fair value inventory adjustment, inclusive of the income tax effect |
|
|
791 |
(2) |
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment for the loss
contingency related to the menu
board patent litigation, inclusive
of the income tax effect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125 |
(3) |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
1,741 |
(4) |
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment for goodwill and intangible
asset impairments, inclusive of
the income tax effect |
|
|
148 |
(5) |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
13,583 |
(6) |
|
|
0.62 |
|
|
|
22,932 |
(7) |
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net income and
earnings per share |
|
$ |
2,785 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
294 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
11,625 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The income tax effects of the adjustments in the tables above were calculated using the
estimated U.S. effective income tax rates for the periods indicated, with appropriate
consideration given for the permanent non-deductible portion of the goodwill impairments in
fiscal 2009 and 2008. The income tax effects were as follows (In thousands):
|
|
|
(1) |
|
$217 |
|
(2) |
|
$407 |
|
(3) |
|
$75 |
|
(4) |
|
$1,059 |
|
(5) |
|
$5 |
|
(6) |
|
$884 |
|
(7) |
|
$5,023 |
F-3
Results of Operations
2010 Compared to 2009
Lighting Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
159,105 |
|
|
$ |
160,475 |
|
Gross Profit |
|
$ |
37,185 |
|
|
$ |
36,403 |
|
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
9,335 |
|
|
$ |
(3,911 |
) |
Lighting Segment net sales of $159,105,000 in fiscal 2010 decreased 0.9% from fiscal 2009 net
sales of $160,475,000. The $1.4 million decrease in Lighting Segment net sales is primarily the
net result of a $17.0 million or 27% net increase in lighting sales to our niche markets (petroleum
/ convenience store market net sales were up 70%, net sales to the automotive dealership market
were down 29%, and net sales to the quick service restaurant market were down 39%) and national
retail accounts, and an $18.4 million or 18.9% decrease in commissioned net sales to the commercial
/ industrial lighting market. Sales of lighting to the petroleum / convenience store market
represented 32% and 19% of Lighting Segment net sales in the fiscal years 2010 and 2009,
respectively. Net sales of lighting to this, the Companys largest niche market, were up 70.0%
from last year to $51,462,000, with approximately $21.4 million related to a program with 7-Eleven,
Inc., who is replacing traditional canopy, site and sign lighting with solid-state LED lighting.
The Company expects to continue to make sales to this particular customer pursuant to new orders
received for their non-petroleum convenience stores to be converted in the first half of fiscal
2011. The petroleum / convenience store market has been, and will continue to be, a very important
niche market for the Company. The Lighting Segments net sales of light fixtures having solid-state
LED technology totaled $37.8 million in fiscal 2010, representing a 496% increase from fiscal 2009
net sales of solid-state LED light fixtures of $6.3 million.
Gross profit of $37,185,000 in fiscal 2010 increased $0.8 million or 2.1% from fiscal 2009,
and increased from 21.9% to 22.5% as a percentage of Lighting Segment net sales (customer plus
inter-segment net sales). The increase in amount of gross profit is due to the net effect of
decreased net sales at increased margins, increased overhead absorption and reduced freight costs.
The following items also influenced the Lighting Segments gross profit margin: competitive
pricing pressures; $1.0 million increased benefits and compensation; $1.1 million increased
warranty costs; $0.4 million decreased utilities; $0.3 million decreased depreciation expense; and
$0.2 million increased property and real estate taxes.
Selling and administrative expenses of $27,834,000 in fiscal year 2010 decreased $1.3 million
primarily as the net result of: increased employee compensation and benefits expense ($0.6
million); decreased sales commission expense ($1.1 million); increased research and development
expense ($0.9 million); decreased outside services expense ($0.2 million); decreased customer
relations expense ($0.5 million); decreased royalty expense ($0.4 million); and decreased warranty
expense ($0.4 million).
The Lighting Segment recorded a fiscal 2010 patent intangible asset impairment expense of
$16,000 as compared to a fiscal 2009 goodwill impairment expense of $11,185,000, resulting in a
favorable change of $11.2 million.
The Lighting Segment fiscal 2010 operating income of $9,335,000 compares to an operating loss
of $(3,911,000) in fiscal 2009. This improvement of $13.2 million was the net result of decreased
net sales, increased gross profit, and decreased selling and administrative expenses, and decreased
impairment expense.
F-4
Graphics Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
68,395 |
|
|
$ |
60,765 |
|
Gross Profit |
|
$ |
13,781 |
|
|
$ |
13,382 |
|
Operating Income |
|
$ |
3,507 |
|
|
$ |
2,646 |
|
Graphics Segment net sales of $68,395,000 in fiscal 2010 increased 12.6% from fiscal 2009 net
sales of $60,765,000. The $7.6 million increase in Graphics Segment net sales is primarily the
result of image conversion programs and sales to ten petroleum / convenience store customers ($16.1
million net increase), a grocery retailer ($5.1 million decrease), five retail customers ($1.2
million net decrease), the LED video sports screen market ($0.2 million increase), a national drug
store retailer ($0.7 million decrease), a lawn care company ($0.4 million decrease), and changes in
volume or completion of several other graphics programs. Sales of graphics products and services
to the petroleum / convenience store market represented 56% and 40% of Graphics Segment net sales
in fiscal years 2010 and 2009, respectively. Net sales of graphics to this, the Companys largest
niche market, were up 58% from last year to $38,490,000, with approximately $17.1 million related
to a program with 7-Eleven, Inc., who is replacing traditional sign lighting with solid-state LED
lighting. The Company expects to continue to make sales to this particular customer pursuant to
new orders received for their non-petroleum convenience stores to be converted primarily in the
first nine months of fiscal year 2011. The petroleum / convenience store market has been, and will
continue to be, a very important niche market for the Company. The Graphics Segment net sales of
products and services related to solid-state LED video screens and LED lighting for signage totaled
$20.3 million in fiscal 2010 as compared to $8.0 million in the prior year.
Image and brand programs, whether full conversions or enhancements, are important to the
Companys strategic direction. Image programs include situations where our customers refurbish
their retail sites around the country by replacing some or all of the lighting, graphic elements,
menu board systems and possibly other items they may source from other suppliers. These image
programs often take several quarters to complete and involve both our customers corporate-owned
sites as well as their franchisee-owned sites, the latter of which involve separate sales efforts
by the Company with each franchisee. The Company may not always be able to replace net sales
immediately when a large image conversion program has concluded. Brand programs typically occur as
new products are offered or new departments are created within existing retail stores. Relative to
net sales to a customer before and after an image or brand program, net sales during the program
are typically significantly higher, depending upon how much business is awarded to the Company.
Sales related to a customers image or brand program are reported in either the Lighting Segment,
Graphics Segment, or the All Other Category depending upon the product and/or service provided.
Gross profit of $13,781,000 in fiscal 2010 increased $0.4 million or 3% from fiscal 2009, and
decreased from 21.5% to 19.9% as a percentage of Graphics Segment net sales (customer plus
inter-segment net sales). The increase in amount of gross profit is due to increased Graphics net
sales at lower margins. The following items also influenced the Graphics Segments gross profit
margin: competitive pricing pressures, and other manufacturing expenses in support of production
requirements ($0.1 million of increased indirect wage, compensation and benefits costs; $0.4
million increased warranty expense; $0.1 million decreased supplies expense; $0.1 million decreased
rental expense; and $0.3 million decreased depreciation and utilities).
Selling and administrative expenses of $10,274,000 in fiscal 2010 increased $0.3 million
primarily as a net result of decreased compensation and benefits ($0.1 million), increased bad debt
expense ($0.3 million), increased customer relations expense ($0.2 million), and decreased outside
services expense ($0.1 million).
F-5
The Graphics Segment recorded a fiscal 2009 goodwill impairment expense of $716,000 with no
similar expense in fiscal 2010, resulting in a favorable change of $0.7 million.
The Graphics Segment fiscal 2010 operating income of $3,507,000 increased $0.9 million or
32.5% from operating income of $2,646,000 in fiscal 2009. The $0.9 million increase in operating
income was the result of increased net sales, increased gross profit, increased selling and
administrative expenses, and decreased impairment expense.
Technology Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
4,505 |
|
|
$ |
4,576 |
|
Gross Profit |
|
$ |
734 |
|
|
$ |
1,028 |
|
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
(653 |
) |
|
$ |
(486 |
) |
Technology Segment net sales of $4,505,000 in fiscal 2010 decreased 1.6% from fiscal 2009 net
sales of $4,576,000. The $0.1 million decrease in Technology Segment net sales is primarily the
result of decreased sales of solid-state LED video screens to the entertainment market ($0.3
million) and decreased sales of specialty LED lighting ($0.1 million), partially offset by
increased net sales to other customers.
Gross profit of $734,000 in fiscal 2010 decreased $0.3 million from fiscal 2009, and changed
from 11.5% to 9.3% as a percentage of Technology Segment net sales (customer plus inter-segment net
sales). The decrease is related to the drop in sales volume and increased warranty expense ($0.2
million).
Selling and administrative expenses of $1,250,000 in fiscal year 2010 decreased $0.3 million,
and decreased to 15.8% from 16.9% as a percentage of Technology Segment net sales (customer plus
inter-segment net sales). Selling and administrative expenses were down in line with reduced net
sales, including $0.2 million reduced outside services, $0.2 million increased royalty expense,
$0.1 million reduced bad debt reserve, $0.1 million reduced depreciation expense, $0.1 million
reduced intangible asset amortization expense, and $0.1 million reduced warranty expense.
The Technology Segment recorded a fiscal 2010 intangible asset impairment expense of $137,000,
with no similar expense in fiscal 2009, resulting in an unfavorable change of $0.1 million.
The Technology Segment fiscal 2010 operating loss of $(653,000) compares to an operating loss
of $(486,000) in fiscal 2009. The decrease in operating income of $0.2 million was the net result
of decreased net sales and gross profit, and a fiscal 2010 impairment expense, partially offset by
decreased selling and administrative expenses.
Electronic Components Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
16,116 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
$ |
3,847 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Operating Income |
|
$ |
2,279 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
F-6
Electronic Components Segment results include the operations of LSI ADL Technology, a
subsidiary that the Company acquired in July 2009. Therefore, the net sales and operating income
in fiscal 2010 are incremental additions to the Companys results as there were no net sales or
operating income in fiscal 2009. Operating income in fiscal 2010 was reduced by $678,000 related
to the roll-out of fair value inventory adjustments for LSI ADL Technologys sales of products that
were in finished goods or work-in-process inventory on the acquisition date and therefore were
valued at fair value, as opposed to manufactured cost, in the opening balance sheet in accordance
with the requirements of purchase accounting.
All Other Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
6,281 |
|
|
$ |
7,983 |
|
Gross Profit |
|
$ |
186 |
|
|
$ |
1,014 |
|
Operating (Loss) |
|
$ |
(12,559 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,660 |
) |
All Other Category net sales of $6,281,000 in fiscal 2010 decreased 21.3% from fiscal 2009 net
sales of $7,983,000. The $1.7 million decrease in the All Other Category net sales is primarily
the net result of net decreased sales to two quick service restaurant menu board customers ($0.8
million), decreased sales of electrical wire harnesses ($1.0 million) and changes in volume or
completion of other customer programs. The Company sold its wire harness operation and business at
the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2010 and will therefore have no further sales of wire
harnesses.
The gross profit of $186,000 in fiscal 2010 compares to gross profit of $1,014,000 in fiscal
2009. The change is primarily the result of the $639,000 loss recorded on the March 2010 sale of
the assets and business of the Companys wire harness operation. The remaining $0.2 million
decrease in amount of gross profit is primarily due to decreased net sales and margins, and
decreased indirect wage compensation and benefits.
Selling and administrative expenses of $12,745,000, which includes Corporate administration
expenses, increased $1.6 million in fiscal year 2010. Changes of expense between years include
acquisition deal costs associated with the acquisition of LSI ADL Technology ($0.5 million
increased expense), increased compensation, benefits and stock option expense ($1.4 million),
decreased menu board patent settlement expense ($0.2 million), decreased outside services expense
($0.4 million), decreased professional fees ($0.2 million), increased research and development
expense ($0.2 million), decrease royalty income ($0.3 million), and decreased depreciation expense
($0.1 million).
The All Other Category recorded a fiscal 2009 goodwill impairment expense of $2,566,000 with
no similar expense in fiscal 2010, resulting in a favorable change of $2.6 million.
The All Other Category fiscal 2010 operating loss of $(12,559,000) compares to an operating
loss of $(12,660,000) in fiscal 2009. This $0.1 million decreased loss was the net result of
decreased net sales, decreased gross profit, and less goodwill impairment, partially offset by
increased selling and administrative expenses.
Consolidated Results
The Company reported net interest expense of $125,000 in fiscal 2010 as compared to net
interest income of $8,000 in fiscal 2009. The Company borrowed on its lines of credit occasionally
in fiscal 2009 and essentially its only borrowings in fiscal 2010 were related to the mortgage loan
assumed in the acquisition of AdL Technology. Commitment fees related to the unused portions of
the Companys lines of credit, and interest income on invested cash are included in the net
interest expense amounts above.
F-7
The $360,000 income tax expense in fiscal 2010 represents a consolidated effective tax rate of
20.2%. This is the net result of a U.S. federal income tax rate of 34% influenced by certain
permanent book-tax differences that were significant relative to the amount of taxable income, by
certain U.S. federal and Canadian income tax credits, by a benefit related to uncertain income tax
positions, by an increase in state income taxes, and by full valuation reserves on the Companys
Canadian tax position and a certain state deferred income tax asset. The income tax benefit in
fiscal 2009 of $989,000 reflects a tax benefit of $105,000 related to the operations of the Company
(which includes a $333,000 release of an uncertain income tax liability associated with a voluntary
disclosure program) and a tax benefit of $884,000 associated with the $14,467,000 impairment of
goodwill (the majority of which was non-deductible for tax purposes).
The Company reported a net income of $1,424,000 in fiscal 2010 as compared to a net loss of
$(13,414,000) in fiscal 2009. The increased net income is primarily the result of increased net
sales, increased gross profit, and significant goodwill impairment in fiscal 2009 as compared to a
minor intangible asset impairment in fiscal 2010, partially offset by increased operating expenses,
increased net interest expense and increased income tax expense. Diluted earnings per share were
$0.06 in fiscal 2010 as compared to a loss of $(0.62) last year. The weighted average common shares
outstanding for purposes of computing diluted earnings per share in fiscal 2010 were 24,134,000
shares as compared to 21,800,000 shares last year, with the increase in shares primarily related to
the weighted effect of the 2,469,676 common shares issued in July 2009 for the acquisition of AdL
Technology.
2009 Compared to 2008
Lighting Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
160,475 |
|
|
$ |
183,694 |
|
Gross Profit |
|
$ |
36,403 |
|
|
$ |
48,773 |
|
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
(3,911 |
) |
|
$ |
15,310 |
|
Lighting Segment net sales of $160,475,000 in fiscal 2009 decreased 12.6% from fiscal 2008 net
sales of $183,694,000. The $23.2 million decrease in Lighting Segment net sales is primarily the
result of a $13.3 million or 17% net decrease in lighting sales to our niche markets (petroleum /
convenience stores, automotive dealerships, and quick service restaurants) and national retail
accounts, and a $9.9 million or 9.2% decrease in commissioned net sales to the commercial /
industrial lighting market. Sales of lighting to the petroleum / convenience store market
represented 19% and 16% of Lighting Segment net sales in fiscal years 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Net sales of lighting to this, the Companys largest niche market, were up 2.2% from last year to
$30,279,000. The petroleum / convenience store market has been, and will continue to be, a very
important niche market for the Company.
Gross profit of $36,403,000 in fiscal 2009 decreased $12.4 million or 25% from the same period
last year, and decreased from 25.9% to 21.9% as a percentage of Lighting Segment net sales
(customer plus intra-segment net sales). The decrease in amount of gross profit is due to
decreased Lighting net sales and margins, caused in part by higher manufacturing overhead costs as
a percentage of net sales due to the lower sales volume. The following items also influenced the
Lighting Segments gross profit margin: competitive pricing pressures; decreased direct labor as a
percentage of net sales; decreased indirect wage, compensation and benefits costs ($0.9 million
decrease); $0.5 million decreased supplies; $0.4 million decreased depreciation expense; $0.3
million decreased repairs and maintenance; $0.2 million decreased utilities; and $0.2 million
decreased property and real estate taxes.
F-8
Selling and administrative expenses of $29,129,000 in fiscal year 2009 decreased $3.2 million,
and increased to 18.2% as a percentage of Lighting Segment net sales from 17.6% in the same period
last year. Employee compensation and benefits expense increased $0.2 million in fiscal 2009 as
compared to last year, and other changes of expense between years include decreased sales
commission expense ($2.9 million), decreased advertising and literature expense ($0.2 million),
increased bad debt expense ($0.2 million), increased research and development expense ($0.7
million), decreased customer relations expense ($0.3 million) and increased outside services
expense ($0.1 million).
The Company recorded a full impairment of goodwill in one reporting unit in the Lighting
Segment in fiscal 2009, and accordingly recorded a non-cash expense in the amount of $11,185,000 as
compared to impairments totaling $1,097,000 of certain intangible assets last year. The
impairments in both years were related to a decline in the market value of the Companys stock as
well as a decline in the estimated forecasted discounted cash flows expected by the respective
reporting units.
The Lighting Segment fiscal 2009 operating loss of $(3,911,000) compares to operating income
of $15,310,000 last year. This decrease of $19.2 million was the result of decreased net sales and
decreased gross profit, and increased impairment charges, partially offset by decreased selling and
administrative expenses.
Graphics Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
60,765 |
|
|
$ |
85,244 |
|
Gross Profit |
|
$ |
13,382 |
|
|
$ |
21,507 |
|
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
2,646 |
|
|
$ |
(14,027 |
) |
Graphics Segment net sales of $60,765,000 in fiscal 2009 decreased 28.7% from fiscal 2008 net
sales of $85,244,000. The $24.5 million decrease in Graphics Segment net sales is primarily the
result of completion of programs for certain graphics customers, including an image conversion
program for a national drug store retailer ($4.3 million decrease), two petroleum / convenience
store customers programs ($25.7 million decrease), reductions of net sales to ten other petroleum
/ convenience store customers ($7.0 million decrease) and changes in volume or completion of other
graphics programs. These decreases were partially offset by increased net sales to certain other
customers, including a reimaging program for a grocery customer ($8.9 million increase), and sales
of solid-state LED video screens for sports markets ($5.7 million increase). Sales responsibility
related to solid-state LED video screens for sports markets was transferred in fiscal 2009 from the
Technology Segment to the Graphics Segment. Sales of graphics products and services to the
petroleum / convenience store market represented 40% and 65% of Graphics Segment net sales in
fiscal years 2009 and 2008, respectively. Net sales of graphics to this, the Companys largest
niche market, were down 56% from last year to $24,295,000. The petroleum / convenience store
market has been, and will continue to be, a very important niche market for the Company. Net sales
of products and services related to solid-state LED video screens totaled $5.7 million in fiscal
2009, with no such sales in the Graphics Segment last year.
Image and brand programs, whether full conversions or enhancements, are important to the
Companys strategic direction. Image programs include situations where our customers refurbish
their retail sites around the country by replacing some or all of the lighting, graphic elements,
menu board systems and possibly other items they may source from other suppliers. These image
programs often take several quarters to complete and involve both our customers corporate-owned
sites as well as their franchisee-owned sites, the latter of which involve separate sales efforts
by the Company with each franchisee. The Company may not always be able to replace net sales
immediately when a large image conversion program has concluded. Brand programs typically occur as
new products are offered or new departments are created within an existing retail store. Relative
to net sales to a customer before and after an image or brand program, net sales during the program
are typically significantly higher, depending upon how much business is awarded to the Company.
Sales related to a customers image or brand program are reported in either the Lighting Segment,
Graphics Segment, or the All Other Category depending upon the product and/or service provided.
F-9
Gross profit of $13,382,000 in fiscal 2009 decreased $8.1 million or 38% from last year, and
decreased from 24.7% to 21.5% as a percentage of Graphics Segment net sales (customer plus
intra-segment net sales). The decrease in amount of gross profit is due both to decreased Graphics
net sales and margins (both product and installation), increased material costs as a percentage of
Graphics Segment net sales, and under utilized manufacturing capacity. The following items also
influenced the Graphics Segments gross profit margin: competitive pricing pressures, decreased
direct labor reflective of less sales volume, and other manufacturing expenses in support of
production requirements ($1.3 million of decreased indirect wage, compensation and benefits costs;
$0.4 million decreased supplies and repairs and maintenance; $0.2 million decreased outside
services; and $0.2 million decreased depreciation and utilities).
Selling and administrative expenses of $10,020,000 in fiscal year 2009 decreased $1.8 million,
and increased to 16.5% as a percentage of Graphics Segment net sales from 13.8% in the same period
last year. Employee compensation and benefits expense decreased $0.8 million in fiscal 2009 as
compared to last year, and other changes of expense between years include decreased bad debt
expense ($0.2 million), decreased customer relations expense ($0.3 million), decreased outside
services expense ($0.2 million), decreased travel and entertainment ($0.1 million), decreased
research and development ($0.2 million) and decreased supplies expense ($0.1 million).
The Company recorded a full impairment of goodwill in one reporting unit in the Graphics
Segment in fiscal 2009, and accordingly recorded a non-cash expense in the amount of $716,000 as
compared to full or partial goodwill and intangible asset impairments of $23,739,000 last year.
The impairments in both years were related to a decline in the market value of the Companys stock
as well as a decline in the estimated forecasted discounted cash flows expected by the respective
reporting units.
The Graphics Segment fiscal 2009 operating income of $2,646,000 compares to an operating loss
of $(14,027,000) last year. This increased operating income of $16.7 million was the result of
decreased net sales and decreased gross profit, offset by significantly decreased impairment
charges and by decreased selling and administrative expenses.
Technology Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
4,576 |
|
|
$ |
9,136 |
|
Gross Profit |
|
$ |
1,028 |
|
|
$ |
1,229 |
|
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
(486 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,876 |
) |
Technology Segment net sales of $4,576,000 in fiscal 2009 decreased 49.9% from fiscal 2008 net
sales of $9,136,000. The $4.6 million decrease in Technology Segment net sales is primarily the
net result of decreased sales of solid-state LED video screens for sports and advertising markets
($3.0 million) and decreased sales of specialty LED lighting ($2.1 million), partially offset by
increased sales of solid-state LED video screens to the entertainment market ($0.8 million). Sales
responsibility related to solid-state LED video screens for sports markets was transferred in
fiscal 2009 from the Technology Segment to the Graphics Segment.
F-10
Gross profit of $1,028,000 in fiscal 2009 decreased $0.2 million or 16% from the same period
last year, and decreased from 12.4% to 11.5% as a percentage of Technology Segment net sales
(customer plus intra-segment net sales). The decrease in amount of gross profit is due to
decreased Technology net sales and margins, partially offset by decreased indirect wages ($0.1
million).
Selling and administrative expenses of $1,514,000 in fiscal year 2009 decreased $1.5 million,
and increased to 33.1% as a percentage of Technology Segment net sales from 32.7% last year.
Employee compensation and benefits expense decreased $0.2 million in fiscal 2009 as compared to
last year, and other changes of expense between years include decreased warranty expense ($0.6
million), increased outside services ($0.2 million), decreased sales commissions expense ($0.2
million) and decreased expense related to amortization of intangibles ($0.2 million).
The Company recorded a full impairment of goodwill in the reporting unit in the Technology
Segment in fiscal 2008, and accordingly recorded a non-cash expense in the amount of $3,119,000.
There was no impairment charge in fiscal 2009. The impairment was related to a decline in the
market value of the Companys stock as well as a decline in the estimated forecasted discounted
cash flows expected by the reporting unit.
The Technology Segment fiscal 2009 operating loss of $(486,000) compares to an operating loss
of $(4,876,000) last year. This increase in operating income of $4.4 million was the net result of
decreased net sales and gross profit, offset by decreased selling and administrative expenses and
no impairment charge in fiscal 2009 as compared to a $3.1 million impairment in fiscal 2008.
All Other Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
7,983 |
|
|
$ |
27,212 |
|
Gross Profit |
|
$ |
1,014 |
|
|
$ |
8,918 |
|
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
(12,660 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,377 |
) |
All Other Category net sales of $7,983,000 in fiscal 2009 decreased 70.7% from fiscal 2008 net
sales of $27,212,000. The $19.2 million decrease in All Other Category net sales is primarily the
result of the fiscal 2008 completion of a menu board replacement program ($19.8 million decrease)
and changes in volume or completion of other customer programs.
Image and brand programs, whether full conversions or enhancements, are important to the
Companys strategic direction. Image programs include situations where our customers refurbish
their retail sites around the country by replacing some or all of the lighting, graphic elements,
menu board systems and possibly other items they may source from other suppliers. These image
programs often take several quarters to complete and involve both our customers corporate-owned
sites as well as their franchisee-owned sites, the latter of which involve separate sales efforts
by the Company with each franchisee. The Company may not always be able to replace net sales
immediately when a large image conversion program has concluded. Brand programs typically occur as
new products are offered or new departments are created within an existing retail store. Relative
to net sales to a customer before and after an image or brand program, net sales during the program
are typically significantly higher, depending upon how much business is awarded to the Company.
Sales related to a customers image or brand program are reported in either the Lighting Segment,
Graphics Segment, or the All Other Category depending upon the product and/or service provided.
Gross profit of $1,014,000 in fiscal 2009 decreased $7.9 million or 89% from last year, and
decreased from 22.5% to 8.4% as a percentage of the All Other Category net sales (customer plus
intra-segment net sales). The decrease in amount of gross profit is primarily due to decreased net
sales and margins, competitive pricing pressures, partially offset by decreased direct labor
reflective of less sales volume, as well as decreased indirect wage, compensation and benefits
costs ($0.1 million reduction).
F-11
Selling and administrative expenses of $11,108,000, which includes Corporate administration
expenses, in fiscal year 2009 decreased $5.2 million. Changes of expense between years include
decreased employee compensation and benefits expense ($0.2 million), decreased menu board patent
infringement settlement costs ($2.6 million), decreased legal fees primarily as a result of
settlement of menu board patent litigation ($0.5 million), decreased research and development
expense ($0.6 million), decreased depreciation expense ($0.4 million), increased audit/accounting
and outside services fees ($0.2 million), decreased customer relations expense ($0.1 million) and
decreased warranty expense ($0.1 million).
The Company recorded a partial impairment of goodwill in one reporting unit in the All Other
Category in fiscal 2009, and accordingly recorded a non-cash expense in the amount of $2,566,000
with no similar impairment expense in the prior year. The impairment was related to a decline in
the market value of the Companys stock as well as a decline in the estimated forecasted discounted
cash flows expected by that reporting unit.
The All Other Category fiscal 2009 operating loss of $(12,660,000) compares to an operating
loss of $(7,377,000) in the same period last year. This increased loss of $5.3 million was the
result of decreased net sales and decreased gross profit, and a goodwill impairment expense in
fiscal 2009, partially offset by decreased selling and administrative expenses.
Consolidated Results
The Company reported net interest income of $8,000 in fiscal 2009 as compared to net interest
income of $279,000 last year. The Company was in a positive cash position and was debt free for
substantially all of fiscal 2008 and generated interest income on invested cash. The Company was
occasionally in a borrowing position in fiscal 2009 and, when in a cash investment position, earned
interest at lower rates than the prior year.
The $989,000 income tax benefit in fiscal 2009 reflects a tax benefit of $105,000 related to
the operations of the Company (which includes a $333,000 release of an uncertain income tax
liability associated with a voluntary disclosure program) and a tax benefit of $884,000 associated
with the $14,467,000 impairment of goodwill (the majority of which was non-deductible for tax
purposes). Income tax expense in fiscal 2008 was $2,357,000, which is reflective of income tax
expense on the reduced normal operating results, $1.8 million of valuation reserves on the
Companys Canadian net operating loss tax benefit and on Canadian tax credits, and the tax benefit
recorded on the impairment charges (goodwill and intangible assets), some of which is not
deductible for tax purposes.
The Company reported a net loss of $(13,414,000) in fiscal 2009 as compared to a net loss of
$(13,048,000) last year. The increased net loss is primarily the result of decreased operating
income in all Segments (which includes pre-tax goodwill and intangible asset impairments of
$14,467,000 and $27,955,000 in fiscal years 2009 and 2008, respectively) and less net interest
income, partially offset by decreased income tax expense. The diluted loss per share was $(0.62)
in fiscal 2009, as compared to a diluted loss per share of $(0.60) last year. The weighted average
common shares outstanding for purposes of computing diluted (loss) per share in fiscal 2009 were
21,800,000 shares as compared to 21,764,000 shares last year.
F-12
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company considers its level of cash on hand, borrowing capacity, current ratio and working
capital levels to be its most important measures of short-term liquidity. For long-term liquidity
indicators, the Company believes its ratio of long-term debt to equity and its historical levels of
net cash flows from operating activities to be the most important measures.
At June 30, 2010, the Company had working capital of $73.6 million, compared to $72.5 million
at June 30, 2009. The ratio of current assets to current liabilities was 3.85 to 1 as compared to
a ratio of 4.70 to 1 at June 30, 2009. The $1.1 million increase in working capital from June 30,
2009 to June 30, 2010, which was influenced by the acquisition of AdL Technology in July 2009, was
primarily related to increased cash and cash equivalents ($3.4 million), increased net accounts
receivable ($5.6 million), partially offset by increased accounts payable ($3.3 million), increased
accrued expenses ($2.9 million), decreased other current assets ($1.6 million), and decreased
inventory ($0.1 million). The Company has a strategy of aggressively managing working capital,
including reduction of the accounts receivable days sales outstanding (DSO) and reduction of
inventory levels, without reducing service to our customers.
The Company generated $16.7 million of cash from operating activities in fiscal 2010 as
compared to a generation of $16.5 million in the prior year. This $0.2 million increase in net cash
flows from operating activities is primarily the net result of greater net income ($14.8 million
favorable), a loss on the sale of a subsidiary ($0.6 million favorable), significant goodwill
impairment in fiscal 2009 as compared to a much smaller impairment of intangible assets in fiscal
2010 ($14.3 million unfavorable), an increase in accounts receivable rather than a decrease
(unfavorable change of $13.0 million), less of a decrease in inventories (unfavorable change of
$7.7 million), an increase in customer prepayments rather than a slight decrease (favorable change
of $0.4 million), an increase in accounts payable rather than a decrease (favorable change of $8.7
million), an increase rather than a decrease in accrued expenses and other (favorable $7.1
million), a decrease rather than an increase in refundable income taxes (favorable $4.3 million),
more of a reduction in the reserve for bad debts (unfavorable $0.1 million), an increase in the
inventory obsolescence reserve rather than a decrease (favorable $0.4 million), increased stock
option expense (favorable $1.4 million) and an increase in deferred income tax assets rather than a
decrease (unfavorable $2.6 million).
Net accounts receivable and notes receivable were $35.3 million and $29.7 million at June 30,
2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively. The increase of $5.6 million in net receivables is primarily
due to combined effects of a higher amount of net sales in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 as
compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, decreased DSO, and the addition of LSI ADL
Technology ($3.0 million). The DSO decreased to 48 days at June 30, 2010 from 51 days at June 30,
2009. The Company believes that its receivables are ultimately collectible or recoverable, net of
certain reserves, and that aggregate allowances for doubtful accounts are adequate.
Net inventories at June 30, 2010 decreased $0.1 million from June 30, 2009 levels. Based on a
strategy of reducing inventory and in response to customer programs and the timing of shipments, a
net inventory increase occurred in fiscal 2010 in the Lighting Segment of approximately $0.7
million (some of this inventory supports certain graphics programs), and net inventory decreases
occurred in the Graphics Segment of approximately $0.8 million, in the Technology Segment of
approximately $1.7 million and in the All Other Category of approximately $1.7 million (which was
primarily related to the Companys sale of its wire harness operation). Additionally, the Company
acquired AdL Technology (reported in the Electronic Components Segment), which increased net
inventory in fiscal 2010 by $3.5 million.
F-13
Cash generated from operations and borrowing capacity under two line of credit facilities are
the Companys primary source of liquidity. The Company has an unsecured $30 million revolving line
of credit with its bank group, with all $30 million of the credit line available as of August 27,
2010. This line of credit is a $30 million three year committed credit facility expiring in the
third quarter of fiscal 2013. The Company previously also had a $10 million committed credit
facility that it chose not to renew and therefore let it expire in the third quarter of fiscal
2010. Additionally, the Company has a separate $5 million line of credit, renewable annually in
the third fiscal quarter, for the working capital needs of its Canadian subsidiary, LSI Saco
Technologies. As of August 27, 2010, all $5 million of this line of credit is available. The
Company believes that $35 million total renewed lines of credit plus cash flows from operating
activities are adequate for the Companys fiscal 2011 operational and capital expenditure needs.
The Company is in compliance with all of its loan covenants.
The Company used $6.3 million of cash related to investing activities in fiscal 2010 as
compared to a use of $3.0 million in the prior year, an unfavorable change of $3.3 million. The
primary change between years relates to the amount of fixed assets purchased, $6,150,000 in fiscal
2010 as compared to $2,994,000 last year ($3.2 million unfavorable). Spending in both periods is
primarily for tooling and equipment, with a manufacturing facility also being purchased in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. The Company received $521,000 in proceeds from the sale of fixed
assets, almost entirely from the sale of the fixed assets of the Companys wire harness operation.
The other change between years relates to the fiscal 2010 acquisition of AdL Technology, net of
cash received ($0.7 million unfavorable). The Company expects fiscal 2011 capital expenditures to
be approximately $5.0 million, exclusive of business acquisitions, if any.
The Company used $7.0 million of cash related to financing activities in fiscal 2010 as
compared to a use of $6.5 million in the prior year. The $0.5 million unfavorable change between
periods is primarily related to the payment of long-term debt on the opening balance sheet of the
acquired LSI ADL Technology as compared to the fiscal 2009 net zero activity on the Companys line
of credit ($2.2 million unfavorable) and lower cash dividend payments ($1.7 million favorable).
The $1.7 million reduction in dividend payments between years is primarily the result of a lower
per share quarterly dividend rate beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 2009. The Company also
used less cash in fiscal 2010 than in the prior year to purchase treasury shares for its
nonqualified deferred compensation plan ($0.1 million favorable).
The Company has, or could have, on its balance sheet financial instruments consisting
primarily of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, revolving lines of credit, and
long-term debt. The fair value of these financial instruments approximates carrying value because
of their short-term maturity and/or variable, market-driven interest rates.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company has no financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk and has no off balance sheet
arrangements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
Contractual Obligations as |
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
1-3 |
|
|
3-5 |
|
|
More than |
|
of June 30, 2010 (a) |
|
Total |
|
|
1 year |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt Obligations |
|
$ |
1,132 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
1,099 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest on Long-Term Debt |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Lease Obligations |
|
|
4,148 |
|
|
|
1,607 |
|
|
|
2,334 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Purchase Obligations |
|
|
14,409 |
|
|
|
14,020 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Other Long-Term Liabilities |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
19,972 |
|
|
$ |
15,833 |
|
|
$ |
3,876 |
|
|
$ |
245 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The liability for uncertain tax positions of $2.5 million is not included due to the
uncertainty of timing of payments. |
F-14
On August 18, 2010 the Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.05
per share (approximately $1,202,000) payable September 7, 2010 to shareholders of record on August
31, 2010. The Companys cash dividend policy is that the indicated annual dividend rate will be
set between 50% and 70% of the expected net income for the current fiscal year. Consideration will
also be given by the Board to special year-end cash or stock dividends. The declaration and amount
of any cash and stock dividends will be determined by the Companys Board of Directors, in its
discretion, based upon its evaluation of earnings, cash flow, capital requirements and future
business developments and opportunities, including acquisitions. Accordingly, the Board
established the indicated annual cash dividend rate of $0.20 per share beginning with the first
quarter of fiscal 2011 consistent with the above dividend policy.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Company is required to make estimates and judgments in the preparation of its financial
statements that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and
related footnote disclosures. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on
various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results
of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities.
The Company continually reviews these estimates and their underlying assumptions to ensure they
remain appropriate. The Company believes the items discussed below are among its most significant
accounting policies because they utilize estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently
uncertain and therefore are based on managements judgment. Significant changes in the estimates
or assumptions related to any of the following critical accounting policies could possibly have a
material impact on the financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized when title to goods and risk of loss have passed to the customer, there
is persuasive evidence of a purchase arrangement, delivery has occurred or services have been
rendered, and collectibility is reasonably assured. Revenue is typically recognized at time of
shipment. In certain arrangements with customers, as is the case with the sale of some of our
solid-state LED video screens, revenue is recognized upon customer acceptance of the video screen
at the job site. Sales are recorded net of estimated returns, rebates and discounts. Amounts
received from customers prior to the recognition of revenue are accounted for as customer
pre-payments and are included in accrued expenses.
The Company has four sources of revenue: revenue from product sales; revenue from
installation of products; service revenue generated from providing integrated design, project
and construction management, site engineering and site permitting; and revenue from shipping
and handling.
Product revenue is recognized on product-only orders upon passing of title and risk of loss,
generally at time of shipment. However, product revenue related to orders where the customer
requires the Company to install the product is recognized when the product is installed. Other
than normal product warranties or the possibility of installation or post-shipment service, support
and maintenance of certain solid state LED video screens, billboards, or active digital signage,
the Company has no post-shipment responsibilities.
F-15
Installation revenue is recognized when the products have been fully installed. The Company
is not always responsible for installation of products it sells and has no post-installation
responsibilities, other than normal warranties.
Service revenue from integrated design, project and construction management, and site
permitting is recognized when all products have been installed at each individual retail site of
the customer on a proportional performance basis.
Shipping and handling revenue coincides with the recognition of revenue from sale of the
product.
The Company evaluates the appropriateness of revenue recognition in accordance with Accounting
Standards Codification (ASC) Subtopic 605-25, Revenue Recognition: MultipleElement Arrangements,
and ASC Subtopic 985-605, Software: Revenue Recognition. Our solid-state LED video screens,
billboards and active digital signage contain software elements which the Company has determined
are incidental and excluded from the scope of ASC Subtopic 985-605.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification
Topic 740, Income Taxes. Accordingly, deferred income taxes are provided on items that are
reported as either income or expense in different time periods for financial reporting purposes
than they are for income tax purposes. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are reported on
the Companys balance sheet. Significant management judgment is required in developing the
Companys income tax provision, including the determination of deferred tax assets and liabilities
and any valuation allowances that might be required against deferred tax assets.
The Company operates in multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these
jurisdictions. The Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities routinely review the
Companys tax returns. These audits can involve complex issues which may require an extended
period of time to resolve. In managements opinion, adequate provision has been made for potential
adjustments arising from these examinations.
The Company is recording estimated interest and penalties related to potential underpayment of
income taxes as a component of tax expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The
reserve for uncertain tax positions is not expected to change significantly in the next twelve
months.
Asset Impairment
Carrying values of goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are reviewed at
least annually for possible impairment in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic
350, Intangibles Goodwill and Other. The Companys impairment review involves the estimation of
the fair value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets using a combination of a market
approach and an income (discounted cash flow) approach, at the reporting unit level, that requires
significant management judgment with respect to revenue and expense growth rates, changes in
working capital and the selection and use of an appropriate discount rate. The estimates of fair
value of reporting units are based on the best information available as of the date of the
assessment. The use of different assumptions would increase or decrease estimated discounted
future operating cash flows and could increase or decrease an impairment charge. Company
management uses its judgment in assessing whether assets may have become impaired between annual
impairment tests. Indicators such as adverse business conditions, economic factors and
technological change or competitive activities may signal that an asset has become impaired. Also
see Note 6.
F-16
Carrying values for long-lived tangible assets and definite-lived intangible assets, excluding
goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, are reviewed for possible impairment as
circumstances warrant as required by Accounting Standards Codification Topic 360, Property, Plant,
and Equipment. Impairment reviews are conducted at the judgment of Company management when it
believes that a change in circumstances in the business or external factors warrants a review.
Circumstances such as the discontinuation of a product or product line, a sudden or consistent
decline in the forecast for a product, changes in technology or in the way an asset is being used,
a history of negative operating cash flow, or an adverse change in legal factors or in the business
climate, among others, may trigger an impairment review. The Companys initial impairment review
to determine if a potential impairment charge is required is based on an undiscounted cash flow
analysis at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows exist. The analysis requires
judgment with respect to changes in technology, the continued success of product lines and future
volume, revenue and expense growth rates, and discount rates.
Credit and Collections
The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts receivable for probable estimated
losses resulting from either customer disputes or the inability of its customers to make required
payments. If the financial condition of the Companys customers were to deteriorate, resulting in
their inability to make the required payments, the Company may be required to record additional
allowances or charges against income. The Company determines its allowance for doubtful accounts
by first considering all known collectibility problems of customers accounts, and then applying
certain percentages against the various aging categories based on the due date of the remaining
receivables. The resulting allowance for doubtful accounts receivable is an estimate based upon
the Companys knowledge of its business and customer base, and historical trends. The Company also
establishes allowances, at the time revenue is recognized, for returns and allowances, discounts,
pricing and other possible customer deductions. These allowances are based upon historical trends.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU 2009-14, Certain Revenue
Arrangements That Include Software Elements. This amended guidance clarifies when revenue can be
recognized when tangible products contain both software and non-software components in a multiple
deliverable arrangement. This update will be effective prospectively for revenue arrangements
entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 or the
Companys fiscal year 2011. The Company does not expect any impact on its consolidated results of
operations, cash flows or financial position when this amended guidance is adopted.
F-17
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU 2009-13, Multiple
Deliverable Revenue Arrangements. This amended guidance enables companies to account for products
or services (deliverables) separately rather than as a combined unit in certain circumstances.
Accounting Standards Codification Subtopic 605-25, Revenue Recognition: Multiple-Element
Arrangements, establishes the accounting and reporting guidance for arrangements under which the
vendor will perform multiple revenue-generating activities. The Subtopic addresses how to separate
deliverables and how to measure and allocate arrangement consideration to one or more units of
accounting. The amended guidance will be effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered
into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 or the Companys
fiscal year 2011. The Company does not expect any impact on its consolidated results of operations,
cash flows or financial position when this amended guidance is adopted.
In April 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU 2010-17, Revenue
Recognition Milestone Method. The amended guidance provides the criteria that should be met for
determining whether the milestone method of revenue recognition is appropriate for research and
development transactions. The amended guidance will be effective prospectively for milestones
achieved in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 or the companys fiscal year 2011. The
Company does not expect any impact on its consolidated results of operations, cash flows or
financial position when the amended guidance is adopted.
F-18
MANAGEMENTS REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Management of LSI Industries Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company or LSI) is responsible for
the preparation and accuracy of the financial statements and other information included in this
report. LSIs Management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Securities Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of Management, including LSIs
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2010, based on the
criteria set forth in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance
that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all
control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues
and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the reality
that judgments in decision making can be faulty, the possibility of human error, and the
circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures.
In meeting its responsibility for the reliability of the financial statements, the Company depends
upon its system of internal accounting controls. The system is designed to provide reasonable
assurance that assets are safeguarded and that transactions are properly authorized and recorded.
The system is supported by policies and guidelines, and by careful selection and training of
financial management personnel. The Company also has a Disclosure Controls Committee, whose
responsibility is to help ensure appropriate disclosures and presentation of the financial
statements and notes thereto. Additionally, the Company has an Internal Audit Department to assist
in monitoring compliance with financial policies and procedures.
The Board of Directors meets its responsibility for overview of the Companys financial statements
through its Audit Committee which is composed entirely of independent Directors who are not
employees of the Company. The Audit Committee meets periodically with Management and Internal
Audit to review and assess the activities of each in meeting their respective responsibilities.
Grant Thornton LLP has full access to the Audit Committee to discuss the results of their audit
work, the adequacy of internal accounting controls, and the quality of financial reporting.
Based upon LSIs evaluation, the Companys principal executive officer and principal financial
officer concluded that internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 30, 2010. We reviewed the results of Managements assessment with the
Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. Additionally, our independent registered public
accounting firm audited and independently assessed the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting. Grant Thornton LLP, an independent registered public accounting
firm has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting, which is presented in the financial statements.
Robert J. Ready
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Ronald S. Stowell
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
F-19
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
LSI Industries Inc.
Cincinnati, Ohio
We have audited LSI Industries Inc. (an Ohio corporation) and subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting
as of June 30, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). LSI Industries Inc. and subsidiaries management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Managements Report On
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on LSI Industries Inc. and
subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included
obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness
exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk,
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and
fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance
with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have
a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, LSI Industries Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal
control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States), the consolidated balance sheet and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity,
cash flows, and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended June 30, 2010 of LSI Industries Inc. and
subsidiaries, and our report dated September 8, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement
schedule.
/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
Cincinnati, Ohio
September 8, 2010
F-20
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
LSI Industries Inc.
Cincinnati, Ohio
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of LSI Industries Inc. (an Ohio corporation) and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of June 30, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders
equity, and cash flows for the year ended June 30, 2010. Our audit of the basic consolidated financial statements
included the financial statement schedule for the year ended June 30, 2010 listed in the index appearing under Item 15.
These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our
audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of LSI Industries Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2010, and the results of their operations and their
cash flows for the year ended June 30, 2010 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the
basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth
therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States), LSI Industries Inc. and subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2010, based on
criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated September 8, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion.
/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
Cincinnati, Ohio
September 8, 2010
F-21
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
LSI Industries Inc.
Cincinnati, Ohio
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of LSI Industries Inc. and subsidiaries
(the Company) as of June 30, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended June 30, 2009.
Our audits also included the consolidated financial statement schedule listed in the Index at
Item 15 for the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. These consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of LSI Industries Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2009, and the results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended June 30,
2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Also, in our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedule for the years ended June 30,
2009 and 2008, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as
a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted the
provisions of accounting for uncertainty in income taxes in Financial Accounting Standards Board
Accounting Standards Codification Topic No. 740, Income Taxes, on July 1, 2007.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Cincinnati, Ohio
September 11, 2009
F-22
LSI INDUSTRIES INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009, and 2008
(In thousands, except per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
254,402 |
|
|
$ |
233,799 |
|
|
$ |
305,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products and services sold |
|
|
198,030 |
|
|
|
181,972 |
|
|
|
224,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of subsidiary |
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of products and services sold |
|
|
198,669 |
|
|
|
181,972 |
|
|
|
224,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
55,733 |
|
|
|
51,827 |
|
|
|
80,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
53,671 |
|
|
|
51,571 |
|
|
|
60,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss contingency (see Note 13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
14,467 |
|
|
|
27,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
1,909 |
|
|
|
(14,411 |
) |
|
|
(10,970 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (income) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
(360 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
1,784 |
|
|
|
(14,403 |
) |
|
|
(10,691 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
(989 |
) |
|
|
2,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,424 |
|
|
$ |
(13,414 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,048 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share (see Note 4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
(0.62 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.60 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
(0.62 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.60 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
24,128 |
|
|
|
21,800 |
|
|
|
21,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
24,134 |
|
|
|
21,800 |
|
|
|
21,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these financial statements.
F-23
LSI INDUSTRIES INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, 2010 and 2009
(In thousands, except shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
17,417 |
|
|
$ |
13,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable, less
allowance for doubtful accounts of
$399 and $532, respectively |
|
|
35,254 |
|
|
|
29,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
40,082 |
|
|
|
40,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refundable income taxes |
|
|
1,146 |
|
|
|
3,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
5,512 |
|
|
|
4,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
99,411 |
|
|
|
92,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
6,784 |
|
|
|
6,501 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
36,148 |
|
|
|
35,270 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
65,507 |
|
|
|
61,342 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,873 |
|
|
|
103,280 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(63,962 |
) |
|
|
(61,237 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
|
44,911 |
|
|
|
42,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill, net |
|
|
10,766 |
|
|
|
1,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Intangible Assets, net |
|
|
15,103 |
|
|
|
12,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Long-Term Assets, net |
|
|
3,654 |
|
|
|
4,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
173,845 |
|
|
$ |
153,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these financial statements.
F-24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
12,553 |
|
|
|
9,249 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
13,257 |
|
|
|
10,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
25,843 |
|
|
|
19,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Long-Term Liabilities |
|
|
3,784 |
|
|
|
3,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares, without par value; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized 1,000,000 shares, none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, without par value; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized 40,000,000 shares; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding 24,054,213 and 21,579,741 shares, respectively |
|
|
99,963 |
|
|
|
82,833 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
44,255 |
|
|
|
47,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
144,218 |
|
|
|
130,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities & shareholders equity |
|
$ |
173,845 |
|
|
$ |
153,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these financial statements.
F-25
LSI INDUSTRIES INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
For the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009, and 2008
(In thousands, except per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2007 |
|
|
21,493 |
|
|
$ |
79,326 |
|
|
$ |
96,735 |
|
|
$ |
176,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,048 |
) |
|
|
(13,048 |
) |
Adoption of reserve for
uncertain tax positions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,582 |
) |
|
|
(2,582 |
) |
Stock compensation awards |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
Purchase of treasury shares, net |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(177 |
) |
Deferred stock compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
Stock option expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
Stock options exercised, net |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
Dividends $0.63 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,580 |
) |
|
|
(13,580 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
21,585 |
|
|
|
81,665 |
|
|
|
67,525 |
|
|
|
149,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,414 |
) |
|
|
(13,414 |
) |
Stock compensation awards |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
Purchase of treasury shares, net |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
Deferred stock compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
Stock option expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,184 |
|
Stock options exercised, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends $0.30 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,471 |
) |
|
|
(6,471 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
21,580 |
|
|
|
82,833 |
|
|
|
47,640 |
|
|
|
130,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,424 |
|
|
|
1,424 |
|
Stock compensation awards |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
Purchase of treasury shares, net |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
Deferred stock compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
Stock option expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,633 |
|
Stock options exercised, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares issued for acquisition |
|
|
2,469 |
|
|
|
14,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,448 |
|
Dividends $0.20 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,809 |
) |
|
|
(4,809 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
24,054 |
|
|
$ |
99,963 |
|
|
$ |
44,255 |
|
|
$ |
144,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these financial statements.
F-26
LSI INDUSTRIES INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009, and 2008
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,424 |
|
|
$ |
(13,414 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,048 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash items included in net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,849 |
|
|
|
7,746 |
|
|
|
8,789 |
|
Loss on sale of a subsidiary |
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
14,467 |
|
|
|
27,955 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(1,564 |
) |
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
(5,904 |
) |
Deferred compensation plan |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
150 |
|
Stock option expense |
|
|
2,633 |
|
|
|
1,184 |
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
Issuance of common shares as compensation |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
Loss on disposition of fixed assets |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(237 |
) |
Inventory obsolescence reserve |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in certain assets and liabilities, net of acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable |
|
|
(3,751 |
) |
|
|
9,229 |
|
|
|
17,130 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
2,826 |
|
|
|
10,541 |
|
|
|
(746 |
) |
Refundable income taxes |
|
|
2,473 |
|
|
|
(1,785 |
) |
|
|
(1,470 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
2,487 |
|
|
|
(6,203 |
) |
|
|
(4,382 |
) |
Accrued expenses and other |
|
|
1,071 |
|
|
|
(6,044 |
) |
|
|
(224 |
) |
Customer prepayments |
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(16,670 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by operating activities |
|
|
16,729 |
|
|
|
16,486 |
|
|
|
12,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant, and equipment |
|
|
(6,150 |
) |
|
|
(2,994 |
) |
|
|
(3,723 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets |
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Proceeds from sale of short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
Acquisition of a business, net of cash received |
|
|
(675 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(6,304 |
) |
|
|
(2,992 |
) |
|
|
4,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of long-term debt |
|
|
(2,237 |
) |
|
|
(1,282 |
) |
|
|
(958 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
|
958 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(4,809 |
) |
|
|
(6,471 |
) |
|
|
(13,580 |
) |
Purchase of treasury shares |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
(262 |
) |
Issuance of treasury shares |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(6,994 |
) |
|
|
(6,500 |
) |
|
|
(12,681 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
3,431 |
|
|
|
6,994 |
|
|
|
4,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
13,986 |
|
|
|
6,992 |
|
|
|
2,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
17,417 |
|
|
$ |
13,986 |
|
|
$ |
6,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these financial statements.
F-27
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Consolidation:
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of LSI Industries Inc. (an Ohio
corporation) and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned. All intercompany transactions
and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Revenue Recognition:
Revenue is recognized when title to goods and risk of loss have passed to the customer, there is
persuasive evidence of a purchase arrangement, delivery has occurred or services have been
rendered, and collectibility is reasonably assured. Revenue from product sales is typically
recognized at time of shipment. In certain arrangements with customers, as is the case with the
sale of some of our solid-state LED (light emitting diode) video screens, revenue is recognized
upon customer acceptance of the video screen at the job site. Sales are recorded net of estimated
returns, rebates and discounts. Amounts received from customers prior to the recognition of revenue
are accounted for as customer pre-payments and are included in accrued expenses.
The Company has four sources of revenue: revenue from product sales; revenue from installation
of products; service revenue generated from providing integrated design, project and
construction management, site engineering and site permitting; and revenue from shipping and
handling.
Product revenue is recognized on product-only orders upon passing of title and risk of loss,
generally at time of shipment. However, product revenue related to orders where the customer
requires the Company to install the product is recognized when the product is installed. Other
than normal product warranties or the possibility of installation or post-shipment service, support
and maintenance of certain solid state LED video screens, billboards, or active digital signage,
the Company has no post-shipment responsibilities.
Installation revenue is recognized when the products have been fully installed. The Company is not
always responsible for installation of products it sells and has no post-installation
responsibilities, other than normal warranties.
Service revenue from integrated design, project and construction management, and site permitting is
recognized when all products have been installed at each individual retail site of the customer on
a proportional performance basis.
Shipping and handling revenue coincides with the recognition of revenue from sale of the product.
The Company evaluates the appropriateness of revenue recognition in accordance with Accounting
Standards Codification (ASC) Subtopic 605-25, Revenue Recognition: MultipleElement Arrangements,
and ASC Subtopic 985-605, Software: Revenue Recognition. Our solid-state LED video screens,
billboards and active digital signage contain software elements which the Company has determined
are incidental and excluded from the scope of ASC Subtopic 985-605.
F-28
Credit and Collections:
The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts receivable for probable estimated losses
resulting from either customer disputes or the inability of its customers to make required
payments. If the financial condition of the Companys customers were to deteriorate, resulting in
their inability to make the required payments, the Company may be required to record additional
allowances or charges
against income. The Company determines its allowance for doubtful accounts by first considering
all known collectibility problems of customers accounts, and then applying certain percentages
against the various aging categories based on the due date of the remaining receivables. The
resulting allowance for doubtful accounts receivable is an estimate based upon the Companys
knowledge of its business and customer base, and historical trends. The Company also establishes
allowances, at the time revenue is recognized, for returns, discounts, pricing and other possible
customer deductions. These allowances are based upon historical trends.
The following table presents the Companys net accounts and notes receivable at the dates
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable |
|
$ |
35,653 |
|
|
$ |
30,213 |
|
less Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(399 |
) |
|
|
(532 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable, net |
|
$ |
35,254 |
|
|
$ |
29,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
The cash balance includes cash and cash equivalents which have original maturities of less than
three months. The Company maintains balances at financial institutions in the United States and
Canada. The balances at financial institutions in Canada are not covered by insurance. As of June
30, 2010 and 2009, the Company had bank balances of $18,530,000 and $1,741,000, respectively, in
excess of FDIC insured limits and therefore without insurance coverage.
Inventories:
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on the first-in,
first-out basis.
Property, Plant and Equipment and Related Depreciation:
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Major additions and betterments are capitalized
while maintenance and repairs are expensed. For financial reporting purposes, depreciation is
computed on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings |
|
28 40 years |
Machinery and equipment |
|
3 10 years |
Computer software |
|
3 8 years |
Costs related to the purchase, internal development, and implementation of the Companys fully
integrated enterprise resource planning/business operating software system are either capitalized
or expensed in accordance with ASC Subtopic 350-40, Intangibles Goodwill and Other: Internal-Use
Software. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of fifteen years or the
remaining term of the lease.
The following table presents the Companys property, plant and equipment at the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
|
$ |
108,873 |
|
|
$ |
103,280 |
|
less Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(63,962 |
) |
|
|
(61,237 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
$ |
44,911 |
|
|
$ |
42,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-29
The Company recorded $5,294,000, $5,667,000 and $6,463,000 of depreciation expense in the years
ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Intangible Assets:
Intangible assets consisting of customer relationships, trade names and trademarks, patents,
technology and software, and non-compete agreements are recorded on the Companys balance sheet.
The definite-lived intangible assets are being amortized to expense over periods ranging between
two and twenty years. The Company periodically evaluates definite-lived intangible assets for
permanent impairment. Neither indefinite-lived intangible assets nor the excess of cost over fair
value of assets acquired (goodwill) are amortized, however they are subject to review for
impairment. See additional information about goodwill and intangibles in Note 6.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments:
The Company has financial instruments consisting primarily of cash and cash equivalents, revolving
lines of credit, and long-term debt. The fair value of these financial instruments approximates
carrying value because of their short-term maturity and/or variable, market-driven interest rates.
The Company has no financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk.
Product Warranties:
The Company offers a limited warranty that its products are free of defects in workmanship and
materials. The specific terms and conditions vary somewhat by product line, but generally cover
defective product returned within one to five years from the date of shipment. The Company records
warranty liabilities to cover the estimated future costs for repair or replacement of defective
returned products as well as products that need to be repaired or replaced in the field after
installation. The Company calculates its liability for warranty claims by applying estimates to
cover unknown claims, as well as estimating the total amount to be incurred for known warranty
issues. The Company periodically assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liabilities and
adjusts the amounts as necessary.
Changes in the Companys warranty liabilities, which are included in accrued expenses in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets, during the periods indicated below were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve |
|
|
Twelve |
|
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of the period |
|
$ |
223 |
|
|
$ |
257 |
|
Additions charged to expense |
|
|
1,870 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
Addition from acquisition |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deductions for repairs and replacements |
|
|
(1,509 |
) |
|
|
(591 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of the period |
|
$ |
589 |
|
|
$ |
223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Benefit Plans:
The Company has a defined contribution retirement plan and a discretionary profit sharing plan
covering substantially all of its non-union employees in the United States, and a non-qualified
deferred compensation plan covering certain employees. The costs of employee benefit plans are
charged to expense and funded annually. Total costs were $943,000 in 2010, $1,592,000 in 2009, and
$2,197,000 in 2008.
F-30
Research and Development Costs:
Research and development expenses are costs directly attributable to new product development,
including the development of new technology for both existing and new products, and consist of
salaries, payroll taxes, employee benefits, materials, supplies, depreciation and other
administrative costs. All costs are expensed as incurred and are classified as operating expenses.
The Company follows the requirements of ASC Subtopic 985-20, Software: Costs of Software to be
Sold, Leased, or Marketed, by expensing as research and development all costs associated with
development of software used in solid-state LED products. Research and development costs incurred
related to both product and software development totaled $5,148,000, $4,052,000 and $4,111,000 for
the fiscal years ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Advertising Expense:
The Company recorded $281,000, $301,000, and $530,000 of advertising expense in 2010, 2009 and
2008, respectively. Advertising costs are expensed the first time the advertising occurs. Expense
related to printed product or capabilities literature, brochures, etc. is recorded on a ratable
basis over the useful life of that printed media.
Earnings Per Common Share:
The computation of basic earnings per common share is based on the weighted average common shares
outstanding for the period net of treasury shares held in the Companys non-qualified deferred
compensation plan. The computation of diluted earnings per share is based on the weighted average
common shares outstanding for the period and includes common share equivalents. Common share
equivalents include the dilutive effect of stock options, contingently issuable shares and common
shares to be issued under a deferred compensation plan, all of which totaled 238,000 shares in
2010, 226,000 shares in 2009 and 210,000 shares in 2008. See further discussion in Note 4.
Stock Options:
The Company measures the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity
instruments and recognizes this cost over the period during which an employee is required to
provide the services.
There were no disqualifying dispositions of shares from stock option exercises in fiscal years 2010
or 2009. The Company recorded $228,500 in fiscal 2008 as a reduction of federal income taxes
payable, $221,300 as an increase in common stock, and $7,200 as a reduction of income tax expense
to reflect the tax credits it will receive as a result of disqualifying dispositions of shares from
stock option exercises. This had the effect of reducing cash flow from operating activities and
increasing cash flow from financing activities by $221,300. See further discussion in Note 9.
New Accounting Pronouncements:
In February 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU 2010-09, Subsequent Events
(Topic 855): Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements. The amendments in the
ASU remove the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date through which subsequent events have
been evaluated in both issued and revised financial statements. The amended guidance was effective
on February 24, 2010, the issuance date of the ASU. The Company adopted this ASU during the three
months ended March 31, 2010.
F-31
In February 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. The
ASU amends the disclosure requirements related to Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
Overall Subtopic (Subtopic 820-10) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, originally issued
as FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. The intent of the amended guidance is improved
disclosure and increased transparency related to Fair Value Measurement in financial reporting.
This amended guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15,
2009, except for the disaggregation requirement for the reconciliation disclosure of Level 3
measurements, which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim
periods within those years. The Company partially adopted the new guidance during the three months
ended March 31, 2010 and there was no impact on the Companys consolidated results of operations,
cash flows or financial position.
Comprehensive Income:
The Company does not have any comprehensive income items other than net income.
Subsequent Events:
The Company has evaluated subsequent events for potential recognition and disclosure for the year
ended June 30, 2010. No items were identified during this evaluation that required adjustment to
or disclosure in the accompanying financial statements.
Reclassifications:
Certain reclassifications may have been made to prior year amounts in order to be consistent with
the presentation for the current year.
Use of Estimates:
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
NOTE 2 BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
Accounting Standards Codification Topic 280, Segment Reporting, establishes standards for reporting
information regarding operating segments in annual financial statements and requires selected
information of those segments to be presented in interim financial statements. Operating segments
are identified as components of an enterprise for which separate discrete financial information is
available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker (the Companys President and Chief
Executive Officer) in making decisions on how to allocate resources and assess performance. While
the Company has thirteen operating segments, one of which was sold during fiscal 2010, it has only
four reportable operating business segments (Lighting, Graphics, Technology, and Electronic
Components) and an All Other Category.
The Lighting Segment includes outdoor, indoor, and landscape lighting that has been fabricated and
assembled for the commercial, industrial and multi-site retail lighting markets, including the
petroleum/convenience store market. The Lighting Segment includes the operations of LSI Ohio
Operations, LSI Metal Fabrication, LSI MidWest Lighting, LSI Lightron and LSI Greenlee Lighting.
These operations have been integrated, have similar economic characteristics and meet the other
requirements for aggregation in segment reporting.
F-32
The Graphics Segment designs, manufactures and installs exterior and interior visual image elements
related to image programs, solid state LED digital advertising billboards, and solid state LED
digital sports video screens. These products are used in visual image programs in several markets,
including
the petroleum/convenience store market, multi-site retail operations, sports and advertising. The
Graphics Segment includes the operations of Grady McCauley, LSI Retail Graphics and LSI Integrated
Graphic Systems, which have been aggregated as such facilities manufacture two-dimensional graphics
with the use of screen and digital printing, fabricate three-dimensional structural graphics sold
in the multi-site retail and petroleum/convenience store markets, and exhibit each of the similar
economic characteristics and meet the other requirements for aggregation in segment reporting.
The Technology Segment designs and produces high-performance light engines, large format video
screens using solid-state LED technology, and certain specialty LED lighting. The primary markets
served with LED video screens are the entertainment market, outdoor advertising billboard and
sports markets not served by our Graphics Segment. The Technology Segment includes the operations
of LSI Saco Technologies.
The Electronic Components Segment designs, engineers and manufactures custom designed electronic
circuit boards, assemblies and sub-assemblies used in various applications including the control of
solid-state LED lighting. Capabilities of this Segment also have applications in the Companys
other LED product lines such as digital scoreboards, advertising ribbon boards and billboards. The
Electronic Components Segment includes the operations of LSI ADL Technology, which was acquired by
the Company on July 22, 2009. See further discussion in Note 15.
The All Other Category includes the Companys operating segments that do not meet the aggregation
criteria, nor the criteria to be a separate reportable segment. Operations of LSI Images (menu
board systems) and LSI Adapt (surveying, permitting and installation management services related to
products of the Graphics Segment) are combined in the All Other Category. Operations of LSI
Marcole (electrical wire harnesses) are included in the All Other Category, although this business
was sold in March 2010. Additionally, the Companys Corporate Administration expense is included
in the All Other Category.
Summarized financial information for the Companys reportable business segments is provided for the
following periods and as of June 30, 2010, June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lighting Segment |
|
$ |
159,105 |
|
|
$ |
160,475 |
|
|
$ |
183,694 |
|
Graphics Segment |
|
|
68,395 |
|
|
|
60,765 |
|
|
|
85,244 |
|
Technology Segment |
|
|
4,505 |
|
|
|
4,576 |
|
|
|
9,136 |
|
Electronic Components Segment |
|
|
16,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Category |
|
|
6,281 |
|
|
|
7,983 |
|
|
|
27,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
254,402 |
|
|
$ |
233,799 |
|
|
$ |
305,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lighting Segment |
|
$ |
9,335 |
|
|
$ |
(3,911 |
) |
|
$ |
15,310 |
|
Graphics Segment |
|
|
3,507 |
|
|
|
2,646 |
|
|
|
(14,027 |
) |
Technology Segment |
|
|
(653 |
) |
|
|
(486 |
) |
|
|
(4,876 |
) |
Electronic Components Segment |
|
|
2,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Category |
|
|
(12,559 |
) |
|
|
(12,660 |
) |
|
|
(7,377 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,909 |
|
|
$ |
(14,411 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,970 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lighting Segment |
|
$ |
3,033 |
|
|
$ |
977 |
|
|
$ |
1,950 |
|
Graphics Segment |
|
|
2,098 |
|
|
|
1,933 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
Technology Segment |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
Electronic Components Segment |
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Category |
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,150 |
|
|
$ |
2,994 |
|
|
$ |
3,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lighting Segment |
|
$ |
3,179 |
|
|
$ |
3,467 |
|
|
$ |
3,852 |
|
Graphics Segment |
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
|
1,299 |
|
Technology Segment |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
Electronic Components Segment |
|
|
854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Category |
|
|
2,438 |
|
|
|
2,595 |
|
|
|
2,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,849 |
|
|
$ |
7,746 |
|
|
$ |
8,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Identifiable assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lighting Segment |
|
$ |
76,938 |
|
|
$ |
72,222 |
|
|
$ |
97,169 |
|
Graphics Segment |
|
|
33,166 |
|
|
|
32,280 |
|
|
|
34,517 |
|
Technology Segment |
|
|
11,991 |
|
|
|
12,317 |
|
|
|
13,806 |
|
Electronic Components Segment |
|
|
23,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Category |
|
|
28,614 |
|
|
|
36,299 |
|
|
|
38,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
173,845 |
|
|
$ |
153,118 |
|
|
$ |
184,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment net sales represent sales to external customers. Intersegment revenues were eliminated in
consolidation as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lighting Segment intersegment
net sales |
|
$ |
6,383 |
|
|
$ |
6,097 |
|
|
$ |
4,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Graphics Segment intersegment
net sales |
|
$ |
862 |
|
|
$ |
1,479 |
|
|
$ |
1,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology Segment intersegment
net sales |
|
$ |
3,413 |
|
|
$ |
4,400 |
|
|
$ |
814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electronic Components intersegment
net sales |
|
$ |
5,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Category intersegment
net sales |
|
$ |
3,562 |
|
|
$ |
4,307 |
|
|
$ |
12,755 |
|
Segment operating income, which is used in managements evaluation of segment performance,
represents net sales less all operating expenses including impairment of goodwill and intangible
assets, but excluding interest expense and interest income.
Identifiable assets are those assets used by each segment in its operations. Corporate assets,
which consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments, refundable income
taxes, and certain intangible assets, are included in the All Other Category.
F-34
The Company considers its geographic areas to be: 1) the United States, and 2) Canada. The
majority of the Companys operations are in the United States; one operation is in Canada. The
geographic distribution of the Companys net sales and long-lived assets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net sales (a): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
249,897 |
|
|
$ |
229,223 |
|
|
$ |
296,150 |
|
Canada |
|
|
4,505 |
|
|
|
4,576 |
|
|
|
9,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
254,402 |
|
|
$ |
233,799 |
|
|
$ |
305,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Long-lived assets (b): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
48,220 |
|
|
$ |
45,898 |
|
|
$ |
47,928 |
|
Canada |
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
48,565 |
|
|
$ |
46,462 |
|
|
$ |
48,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a. |
|
Net sales are attributed to geographic areas based upon the location of the operation making
the sale. |
|
b. |
|
Long-lived assets includes property, plant and equipment, and other long term assets.
Goodwill and intangible assets are not included in long-lived assets. |
NOTE 3 MAJOR CUSTOMER CONCENTRATIONS
The Companys Lighting Segment and Graphics Segment net sales to 7-Eleven, Inc. represented
approximately $41,997,000 or 17% of consolidated net sales in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010.
There were no customers or customer programs representing a concentration of 10% or more of the
Companys net sales in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2009 or 2008. There was no concentration of
accounts receivable at June 30, 2010 or 2009.
NOTE 4 EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
The following table presents the amounts used to compute basic and diluted earnings (loss) per
common share, as well as the effect of dilutive potential common shares on weighted average shares
outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,424 |
|
|
$ |
(13,414 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,048 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
during the period, net
of treasury shares (a) |
|
|
23,896 |
|
|
|
21,574 |
|
|
|
21,554 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
in the Deferred Compensation Plan
during the period |
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
24,128 |
|
|
|
21,800 |
|
|
|
21,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
(0.62 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.60 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,424 |
|
|
$ |
(13,414 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,048 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
24,128 |
|
|
|
21,800 |
|
|
|
21,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities (b): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of common shares to be
issued under stock option plans,
and contingently issuable shares,
if any |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding (c) |
|
|
24,134 |
|
|
|
21,800 |
|
|
|
21,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
(0.62 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.60 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes shares accounted for like treasury stock in accordance with Accounting
Standards Codification Topic 710, Compensation General. |
F-35
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Calculated using the Treasury Stock method as if dilutive securities were exercised
and the funds were used to purchase common shares at the average market price during the
period. |
|
(c) |
|
Options to purchase 2,046,573 common shares, 1,512,367 common shares, and 563,467
common shares at June 30, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively, were not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise price was greater than the
average fair market value of the common shares. |
NOTE 5 BALANCE SHEET DATA
The following information is provided as of June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Inventories: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
19,029 |
|
|
$ |
20,498 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
8,891 |
|
|
|
7,097 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
12,162 |
|
|
|
12,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
40,082 |
|
|
$ |
40,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
$ |
6,725 |
|
|
$ |
5,788 |
|
Customer prepayments |
|
|
2,233 |
|
|
|
1,816 |
|
Accrued sales commissions |
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
919 |
|
Other accrued expenses |
|
|
3,415 |
|
|
|
1,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,257 |
|
|
$ |
10,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 6 GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 350, Intangibles Goodwill and
Other, the Company is required to perform an annual impairment test of its goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets. The Company performs this test as of July 1st of
each fiscal year and on an interim basis when an event occurs or circumstances change that would
more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. The
Company uses a combination of the market approach and the income (discounted cash flow) approach in
determining the fair value of its reporting units. Under ASC Topic 350, the goodwill impairment
test is a two-step process. Under the first step, the fair value of the Companys reporting unit is
compared to its respective carrying value. An indication that goodwill is impaired occurs when the
fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying value. When there is an indication that
goodwill is impaired, the Company is required to perform a second step. In step two, the actual
impairment of goodwill is calculated by comparing the implied fair value of the goodwill with the
carrying value of the goodwill.
The Company identified its reporting units in conjunction with its annual goodwill impairment
testing. The Company relies upon a number of factors, judgments and estimates when conducting its
impairment testing. These include operating results, forecasts, anticipated future cash flows and
marketplace data, to name a few. There are inherent uncertainties related to these factors and
judgments in applying them to the analysis of goodwill impairment.
F-36
Due to economic conditions, the effects of the recession on the Companys markets and the decline
in the Companys stock price, management believed that additional goodwill impairment tests were
required as of December 31, 2008, March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009. The impairment test performed
as of June 30, 2009 was actually the Companys annual goodwill impairment test that was to be
performed in fiscal 2010 as of July 1, 2009; however, because the conditions that resulted in
goodwill impairment were present as of June 30, 2009, the impairment charge of $260,000 was
recorded as of that date. Based upon the Companys analysis as of these three balance sheet dates,
it was determined that the goodwill associated with three of the remaining five reporting units
that contained goodwill was either fully or partially impaired. The total amount of the goodwill
impairment in fiscal 2009 was $14,467,000, of which $11,185,000 was full impairment of the goodwill
in one reporting unit in the Lighting Segment, $716,000 was full impairment of the goodwill in one
reporting unit in the Graphics Segment, and $2,566,000 was a partial impairment of goodwill in one
reporting unit in the All Other Category. The impairment charges were due to a combination of a
decline in the market capitalization of the Company and/or a decline in the estimated forecasted
discounted cash flows since the previous goodwill impairment test was performed.
There were no triggering events in fiscal 2010 related to goodwill impairment testing and, as a
result, there was no impairment of goodwill recorded in fiscal 2010.
The following table presents information about the Companys goodwill on the dates or for the
periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electronic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
Lighting |
|
|
Graphics |
|
|
Technology |
|
|
Components |
|
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Category |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
34,913 |
|
|
$ |
24,959 |
|
|
$ |
3,119 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,917 |
|
|
$ |
66,908 |
|
Accumulated impairment
losses |
|
|
(23,593 |
) |
|
|
(23,985 |
) |
|
|
(3,119 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
(50,883 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,320 |
|
|
$ |
974 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,731 |
|
|
$ |
16,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
(11,185 |
) |
|
|
(716 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,566 |
) |
|
|
(14,467 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
34,913 |
|
|
$ |
24,959 |
|
|
$ |
3,119 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,917 |
|
|
$ |
66,908 |
|
Accumulated impairment
losses |
|
|
(34,778 |
) |
|
|
(24,701 |
) |
|
|
(3,119 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,752 |
) |
|
|
(65,350 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,165 |
|
|
$ |
1,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill (a) |
|
$ |
34,913 |
|
|
$ |
24,959 |
|
|
$ |
3,119 |
|
|
$ |
9,208 |
|
|
$ |
3,731 |
|
|
$ |
75,930 |
|
Accumulated impairment
losses (a) |
|
|
(34,778 |
) |
|
|
(24,701 |
) |
|
|
(3,119 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,566 |
) |
|
|
(65,164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,208 |
|
|
$ |
1,165 |
|
|
$ |
10,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
One operating segment in the All Other Category with fully impaired goodwill of $186
was sold in fiscal 2010. |
F-37
In fiscal 2010, the Company determined that an intangible asset with a net carrying value of
$16,000 for a patent in the Lighting Segment was fully impaired and that an intangible asset with a
carrying value of $137,000 for a trade name in the Technology Segment was also fully impaired.
Accordingly, the Company recorded $153,000 of intangible asset impairment expense in fiscal 2010.
The acquisition of LSI ADL Technology resulted in the following amortizable intangible assets being
recorded on the Companys balance sheet as of the July 22, 2009 acquisition date: customer
relationships $2,880,000 (twelve year amortization period);
Technology $780,000 (ten year amortization period); trade name
$460,000 (five year amortization period) and non-compete agreements
$710,000 (seven year amortization period). The weighted average
amortization period of these four intangible assets is ten years
three months. See further discussion in Note 15.
The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization by major other intangible asset class is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible Assets |
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Intangible Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
10,352 |
|
|
$ |
4,950 |
|
|
$ |
5,402 |
|
Patents |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
LED Technology
firmware, software |
|
|
11,228 |
|
|
|
6,043 |
|
|
|
5,185 |
|
Trade name |
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,000 |
|
|
|
11,319 |
|
|
|
11,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks and trade names |
|
|
3,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Intangible Assets |
|
$ |
26,422 |
|
|
$ |
11,319 |
|
|
$ |
15,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Intangible Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
7,472 |
|
|
$ |
4,173 |
|
|
$ |
3,299 |
|
Patents |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
LED Technology
firmware, software |
|
|
10,448 |
|
|
|
4,478 |
|
|
|
5,970 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,660 |
|
|
|
9,238 |
|
|
|
9,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks and trade names |
|
|
3,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Intangible Assets |
|
$ |
22,219 |
|
|
$ |
9,238 |
|
|
$ |
12,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization Expense of Other Intangible Assets |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,555 |
|
|
$ |
2,079 |
|
|
$ |
2,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company expects to record amortization expense through fiscal 2015 as follows: 2011
through 2012 $2,588,000 per year; 2013 $2,325,000; 2014 $619,000; 2015 $532,000;
and after 2015 $3,029,000.
F-38
NOTE 7 REVOLVING LINES OF CREDIT AND LONG-TERM DEBT
The Company has a $30 million unsecured revolving line of credit with its bank group in the U.S.,
all of which was available as of June 30, 2010. The line of credit expires in the third quarter of
fiscal 2013. Annually in the third quarter, the credit facility is renewable with respect to
adding an additional year of commitment, if the bank group so chooses, to replace the year just
ended. Interest on the revolving lines of credit is charged based upon an increment over the LIBOR
rate as periodically determined, or at the banks base lending rate, at the Companys option. The
increment over the LIBOR borrowing rate, as periodically determined, fluctuates between 225 and 265
basis points depending upon the ratio of indebtedness to earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), as defined in the credit facility. The fee on the unused
balance of the $30 million committed line of credit is 25 basis points. Under terms of this credit
facility, the Company has agreed to a negative pledge of assets, to maintain minimum levels of
profitability and net worth, and is subject to certain maximum levels of leverage. A second U.S.
revolving line of credit in the amount of $10 million, which the Company chose to not renew,
expired in the third quarter of fiscal 2010.
The Company also has a $5 million line of credit for its Canadian subsidiary. The line of credit
expires in the third quarter of fiscal 2011. Interest on the Canadian subsidiarys line of credit
is charged based upon a 200 basis point increment over the LIBOR rate or based upon an increment
over the United States base rate if funds borrowed are denominated in U.S. dollars or an increment
over the Canadian prime rate if funds borrowed are denominated in Canadian dollars. There are no
borrowings against this line of credit as of June 30, 2010.
The Company assumed a mortgage loan with the acquisition of AdL Technology in July 2009. Monthly
principal payments of approximately $10,000 are to be made through August, 2012 at an interest rate
of 7.76%, at which time the balance is payable in full. The real estate of LSI ADL Technology has
been pledged as collateral for the mortgage.
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage balance |
|
$ |
1,132 |
|
Less current maturities |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities of long-term debt are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended June 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
33 |
|
2012 |
|
|
34 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-39
The Company also assumed approximately $2.2 million of additional long-term debt with the
acquisition of AdL Technology and paid it off at the time of the acquisition. In connection with
the lines of credit, the Company is required to comply with financial covenants that limit the
amount of debt obligations, require a minimum amount of tangible net worth, and limit the ratio of
indebtedness to EBITDA (earnings before income taxes, depreciation and amortization).
The Company is in compliance with all of its loan covenants as of June 30, 2010.
NOTE 8 CASH DIVIDENDS
The Company paid cash dividends of $4,809,000, $6,471,000, and $13,580,000 in fiscal years 2010,
2009, and 2008, respectively. In August 2010, the Companys Board of Directors declared a $0.05
per share regular quarterly cash dividend (approximately $1,202,000) payable on September 7, 2010
to shareholders of record August 31, 2010.
NOTE 9 EQUITY COMPENSATION
Stock Options
The Company has an equity compensation plan that was approved by shareholders which covers all of
its full-time employees, outside directors and advisors. The options granted or stock awards made
pursuant to this plan are granted at fair market value at date of grant or award. Options granted
to non-employee directors become exercisable 25% each ninety days (cumulative) from date of grant
and options granted to employees generally become exercisable 25% per year (cumulative) beginning
one year after the date of grant. If a stock option holders employment with the Company
terminates by reason of death, disability or retirement, as defined in the Plan, any award shall be
fully vested. The number of shares reserved for issuance is 2,800,000, of which 833,585 shares
were available for future grant or award as of June 30, 2010. This plan allows for the grant of
incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted and
unrestricted stock awards, performance stock awards, and other stock awards. As of June 30, 2010,
a total of 2,123,086 options for common shares were outstanding from this plan as well as two
previous stock option plans (both of which had also been approved by shareholders), and of these, a
total of 1,051,211 options for common shares were vested and exercisable. The approximate unvested
stock option expense as of June 30, 2010 that will be recorded as expense in future periods is
$1,211,000. The weighted average time over which this expense will be recorded is approximately 20
months.
The fair value of each option on the date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model. The below listed weighted average assumptions were used for grants in the periods
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
2.95 |
% |
|
|
4.60 |
% |
|
|
3.61 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
Expected life |
|
4.3 yrs. |
|
|
5.1 yrs. |
|
|
4.3 yrs. |
|
At June 30, 2010, the 648,500 options granted during fiscal 2010 to employees and non-employee
directors had exercise prices ranging from $5.37 to $8.40, fair values ranging from $1.87 to $2.87
per option, and remaining contractual lives of nine years ten months to nearly ten years.
At June 30, 2009, the 365,800 options granted in fiscal 2009 to non-employee directors had exercise
prices ranging from $4.34 to $8.98, fair values ranging from $1.12 to $2.21, and remaining
contractual lives of approximately nine and one-half to ten years.
F-40
At June 30, 2008, the 328,200 options granted in fiscal 2008 to both employees and non-employee
directors had exercise prices ranging from $12.58 to $19.76, fair values ranging from $3.07 to
$6.61, and remaining contractual lives of between four years eight months and nine years two
months.
The Company calculates stock option expense using the Black-Scholes method, and records the expense
on a straight line basis with an estimated 6.6% forfeiture rate. The expected volatility of the
Companys stock was calculated based upon the historic monthly fluctuation in stock price for a
period approximating the expected life of option grants. The risk-free interest rate is the rate
of a five year Treasury security at constant, fixed maturity on the approximate date of the stock
option grant. The expected life of outstanding options is determined to be less than the
contractual term for a period equal to the aggregate group of option holders estimated weighted
average time within which options will be exercised. It is the Companys policy that when stock
options are exercised, new common shares shall be issued. The Company recorded $2,633,000,
$1,184,000, and $1,246,000 of expense related to stock options in fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. As of June 30, 2010, the Company expects that approximately 1,015,400 outstanding
stock options having a weighted average exercise price of $10.42, intrinsic value of $9,400 and
weighted average remaining contractual terms of 8.4 years will vest in the future.
Information related to all stock options for the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008 is shown
in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Contractual Term |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at 6/30/09 |
|
|
1,537,212 |
|
|
$ |
13.07 |
|
|
6.4 years |
|
|
$ |
33,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
648,500 |
|
|
$ |
8.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeitures |
|
|
(62,626 |
) |
|
$ |
11.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at 6/30/10 |
|
|
2,123,086 |
|
|
$ |
11.64 |
|
|
6.6 years |
|
|
$ |
15,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at 6/30/10 |
|
|
1,051,211 |
|
|
$ |
12.98 |
|
|
4.7 years |
|
|
$ |
5,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Contractual Term |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at 6/30/08 |
|
|
1,197,482 |
|
|
$ |
14.44 |
|
|
6.5 years |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
365,800 |
|
|
$ |
8.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeitures |
|
|
(26,070 |
) |
|
$ |
12.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at 6/30/09 |
|
|
1,537,212 |
|
|
$ |
13.07 |
|
|
6.4 years |
|
|
$ |
33,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at 6/30/09 |
|
|
830,087 |
|
|
$ |
12.52 |
|
|
4.8 years |
|
|
$ |
2,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Contractual Term |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at 6/30/07 |
|
|
983,788 |
|
|
$ |
12.16 |
|
|
6.3 years |
|
|
$ |
5,642,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
328,200 |
|
|
$ |
19.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeitures |
|
|
(9,500 |
) |
|
$ |
16.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(105,006 |
) |
|
$ |
9.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at 6/30/08 |
|
|
1,197,482 |
|
|
$ |
14.44 |
|
|
6.5 years |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at 6/30/08 |
|
|
615,482 |
|
|
$ |
11.43 |
|
|
4.9 years |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the year ended June 30, 2008 was
$913,700. No options were exercised in the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
The Company received $855,000 of cash and 8,068 common shares of the Companys stock from employees
who exercised 105,006 options during the twelve months ended June 30, 2008. Additionally, the
Company recorded $228,500 in fiscal 2008 as a reduction of federal income taxes payable, $221,300
as an increase in common stock, and $7,200 as a reduction of income tax expense related to the
exercises of stock options in which the employees sold the common shares prior to the passage of
twelve months from the date of exercise.
Information related to unvested stock options for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010 is shown in
the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Contractual Term |
|
|
Value |
|
Outstanding unvested
stock options at 6/30/09 |
|
|
707,125 |
|
|
$ |
13.72 |
|
|
8.3 years |
|
|
$ |
31,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(255,500 |
) |
|
$ |
14.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeitures |
|
|
(28,250 |
) |
|
$ |
12.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
648,500 |
|
|
$ |
8.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding unvested
stock options at 6/30/10 |
|
|
1,071,875 |
|
|
$ |
10.32 |
|
|
8.4 years |
|
|
$ |
10,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Compensation Awards
The Company awarded a total of 6,848 common shares in fiscal 2010, and 6,032 in fiscal 2009, and
2,558 in fiscal 2008 as stock compensation awards. These common shares were valued at their
approximate $45,538, $40,680 and $43,875 fair market values on their dates of issuance,
respectively, pursuant to the compensation programs for non-employee directors who receive a
portion of their compensation as an award of Company stock and for employees who receive a nominal
stock award following their twentieth employment anniversary. Stock compensation awards are made
in the form of newly issued common shares of the Company.
F-42
Deferred Compensation Plan
The Company has a non-qualified deferred compensation plan providing for both Company contributions
and participant deferrals of compensation. The Plan is fully funded in a Rabbi Trust. All Plan
investments are in common shares of the Company. As of June 30, 2010 there were 28 participants,
all with fully vested account balances. A total of 224,884 common shares with a cost of
$2,403,600, and 222,832 common shares with a cost of $2,455,900 were held in the Plan as of June
30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively, and, accordingly, have been recorded as treasury shares.
The change in the number of shares held by this plan is the net result of share purchases and sales
on the open stock market for compensation deferred into the Plan and for distributions to
terminated employees. The Company does not issue new common shares for purposes of the
non-qualified deferred compensation plan. The Company accounts for assets held in the
non-qualified deferred compensation plan in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic
710, Compensation General. For fiscal year 2011, the Company estimates the Rabbi Trust for the
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan will make net repurchases in the range of 18,000 to 20,000
common shares of the Company. During fiscal years 2010 and 2009, the Company used approximately
$110,600 and $188,500, respectively, to purchase common shares of the Company in the open stock
market for either employee salary deferrals or Company contributions into the non-qualified
deferred compensation plan. The Company does not currently repurchase its own common shares for
any other purpose.
NOTE 10 LEASES AND PURCHASE COMMITMENTS
The Company leases certain of its facilities and equipment under operating lease arrangements.
Rental expense was $2,254,000 in 2010, $2,243,000 in 2009, and $2,554,000 in 2008. Minimum annual
rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases are: $1,607,000 in 2011, $1,338,000 in
2012, $996,000 in 2013, $185,000 in 2014 and $18,000 in 2015. Purchase commitments, including
minimum annual rental commitments, of the Company totaled $19,972,000 and $22,404,000 as of June
30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively.
NOTE 11 INCOME TAXES
The following information is provided for the years ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Components of income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
2,323 |
|
|
$ |
(13,911 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,818 |
) |
Foreign |
|
|
(539 |
) |
|
|
(492 |
) |
|
|
(4,873 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
$ |
1,784 |
|
|
$ |
(14,403 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,691 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal |
|
$ |
2,015 |
|
|
$ |
(1,629 |
) |
|
$ |
7,523 |
|
State and local |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
928 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current |
|
|
1,924 |
|
|
|
(1,990 |
) |
|
|
8,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
(1,564 |
) |
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
(5,904 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
$ |
360 |
|
|
$ |
(989 |
) |
|
$ |
2,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Reconciliation to federal statutory rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal statutory tax rate |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
State and local taxes, net of federal benefit |
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
Impact of Foreign Operations |
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
Federal and state tax credits |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(27.9 |
) |
|
|
(36.2 |
) |
Valuation allowance |
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
(15.6 |
) |
Domestic Production Activities Deduction |
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Other |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
20.2 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
(22.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of deferred income tax assets and (liabilities) at June 30, 2010 and 2009 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves against current assets |
|
$ |
213 |
|
|
$ |
160 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
1,132 |
|
|
|
1,093 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
(2,701 |
) |
|
|
(4,049 |
) |
Goodwill, acquisition costs and intangible assets |
|
|
3,026 |
|
|
|
5,181 |
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
809 |
|
|
|
890 |
|
State net operating loss carryover and credits |
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
958 |
|
Foreign net operating loss carryover and credits |
|
|
2,447 |
|
|
|
1,940 |
|
Valuation reserve |
|
|
(2,531 |
) |
|
|
(1,940 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax asset |
|
$ |
3,412 |
|
|
$ |
4,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation to the balance sheets as of June 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Deferred income tax asset included in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
$ |
1,345 |
|
|
$ |
1,253 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
2,067 |
|
|
|
2,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax asset |
|
$ |
3,412 |
|
|
$ |
4,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010 the Company has recorded a deferred state income tax asset in the amount of
$933,000, net of federal tax benefits, related to non-refundable New York state tax credits. As of
June 30, 2009 the Company had recorded two deferred state income tax assets, one in the amount of
$18,000 related to a state net operating loss carryover generated by the Companys New York
subsidiary, and the other in the amount of $940,000, net of federal tax benefits, related to
non-refundable New York state tax credits. The Company has determined that these deferred state
income tax assets totaling $933,000 and $958,000 as of June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, do not
require any valuation reserves because, in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification
Subtopic 740-10, Income Taxes: Overall, these assets will, more likely than not, be realized.
Additionally, the Company has recorded an $84,000 deferred state income tax asset related to a
state net operating loss carryover in Tennessee, and has determined that a full valuation reserve
is required. This activity netted to an additional state income tax expense (benefit) of
$(59,000), $25,000 and $16,000 in fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
As of June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company has recorded deferred tax assets for its Canadian
subsidiary related to net operating loss carryover and to research and development tax credits
totaling $2,447,000 and $1,940,000, respectively. In view of the impairment of the goodwill and
certain intangible assets on the financial statements of this subsidiary and a current series of
loss years, the Company has determined these assets, more likely than not, will not be realized.
Additionally, the Company has recorded an $84,000 deferred state tax asset related to its
subsidiary in Tennessee.
Since this business was sold, the Company has determined this asset more likely than not, will not
be realized. Accordingly, full valuation reserves of $2,531,000 and $1,940,000 were recorded as of
June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
F-44
The Company adopted the provisions of accounting for uncertainty in income taxes (ASC Subtopic
740-10, Income Taxes: Overall) on July 1, 2007. As a result of adoption, the Company recognized
$2,582,000 in reserves for uncertain tax positions and recorded a charge of $2,582,000 to the
July 1, 2007 retained earnings balance. At June 30, 2010, tax and interest, net of potential
federal tax benefits, were $1,660,000 and $449,000, respectively, of the total reserves of
$2,456,000. Additionally, penalties were $347,000 of the reserve at June 30, 2010. Of the
$2,456,000 reserve for uncertain tax positions, $2,109,000 would have an unfavorable impact on the
effective tax rate if recognized. At June 30, 2009, tax and interest, net of potential federal tax
benefits, were $1,873,000 and $447,000, respectively, of the total reserves of $2,734,000.
Additionally, penalties were $414,000 of the reserve at June 30, 2009. Of the $2,734,000 reserve
for uncertain tax positions, $2,320,000 would have an unfavorable impact on the effective tax rate
if recognized.
The Company recognized a $216,000 tax benefit in fiscal 2010, a $226,000 tax benefit in fiscal 2009
and a $385,000 tax expense in 2008 related to the change in reserves for uncertain tax positions.
The Company is recording estimated interest and penalties related to potential underpayment of
income taxes as a component of tax expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The
reserve for uncertain tax positions is not expected to change significantly in the next twelve
months.
The fiscal 2010 and 2009 activity in the Liability for Uncertain Tax Positions, which is included
in Other Long-Term Liabilities, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of the fiscal year |
|
$ |
2,693 |
|
|
$ |
3,040 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Unrecognized tax reserve July 1, 2007 adoption |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,449 |
|
Increases tax positions in prior period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349 |
|
Decreases tax positions in prior period |
|
|
(255 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increases tax positions in current period |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
436 |
|
Decreases tax positions in current period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements and payments |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
(361 |
) |
|
|
(179 |
) |
Lapse of statute of limitations |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax reserve end of the fiscal year |
|
$ |
2,366 |
|
|
$ |
2,693 |
|
|
$ |
3,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return in the United States, and files various
combined and separate tax returns in several foreign, state, and local jurisdictions. With limited
exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. Federal, state and local tax examinations by
tax authorities for fiscal years ending prior to June 30, 2007. The Companys U.S. Federal income
tax return for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 is currently under examination by the Internal
Revenue Service.
NOTE 12 SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash payments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
144 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
519 |
|
|
$ |
564 |
|
|
$ |
10,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares as compensation |
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
F-45
NOTE 13 LOSS CONTINGENCY
The Company is party to various negotiations, customer bankruptcies, and legal proceedings arising
in the normal course of business. The Company had been the defendant for a number of years in a
complex lawsuit alleging patent infringement with respect to some of the Companys menu board
systems sold over approximately eleven years. Pursuant to settlement discussions initiated by the
plaintiffs, the Company made a $2,800,000 offer to settle this matter and, accordingly, recorded a
loss contingency reserve in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. Following additional discussions in
the second quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company reached a full and complete settlement of all
matters related to this menu board patent infringement lawsuit. Accordingly, an additional
$200,000 expense was recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 and a payment of $3,000,000 was
made to the plaintiffs.
NOTE 14 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company has recorded expense for the following related party transactions in the fiscal years
indicated (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL |
|
$ |
277 |
|
|
$ |
266 |
|
|
$ |
177 |
|
American Engineering and Metal Working |
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
202 |
|
|
$ |
192 |
|
3970957 Canada Inc. |
|
$ |
181 |
|
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
189 |
|
As of the balance sheet date indicated, the Company had the following liabilities recorded with
respect to related party transactions (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
American Engineering and Metal Working |
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
The law firm of Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL, of which one of the Companys independent outside
directors is a senior partner, is the Companys primary outside law firm providing legal services
in most all areas required other than patents and intellectual property. The manufacturing firm of
American Engineering and Metal Working, which is owned and operated by the son of the president of
the Companys Graphics Segment, provides metal fabricated components. 3970957 Canada Inc., which
is owned by the former president and another executive of the Companys LSI Saco Technologies
subsidiary, owns the building that the Canadian operation occupies and rents. All related parties
provide the Company either products or services at market-based arms-length prices.
NOTE 15 ACQUISITION
On July 22, 2009, the Company completed the acquisition of certain net assets and 100% of the
business of three related companies (AdL Technology, AdL Engineering and Kelmilfeen collectively,
AdL or AdL Technology), which were privately owned and based in Columbus, Ohio. This new 100%
owned subsidiary operates under the name of LSI ADL Technology Inc. Consideration for the asset
purchase of these businesses totaled $15,781,480, and consisted of 2,469,676 shares of LSIs
unregistered common stock (the fair value of which was determined based upon the closing market
price of LSIs common shares on the acquisition date) and cash of $1,333,875. The purchase price
exceeded the fair value of the net assets being acquired, and therefore goodwill in the amount of
$9,208,000 was recorded with this acquisition. Additionally, LSI assumed long-term debt of
$3,368,874 in the purchase of substantially all net assets of these businesses. The goodwill
associated with this acquisition consists largely of the synergies expected from combining AdL and
LSI Industries and the vertical integration of the design and manufacture of electronic circuit
boards used in many of the
Companys products. None of the goodwill will be deductible by the Company for tax purposes.
There were no contingent liabilities or assets associated with the purchase of AdL. There were
$520,000 of acquisition transaction costs included in the financial results for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2010 in selling and administrative expenses, and $678,000 of expense in cost of
products sold related to the roll-out of fair value inventory adjustments for LSI ADL Technologys
sales of products that were in finished goods or work-in-process inventory on the acquisition date
and therefore were valued at fair value, as opposed to manufactured cost, in the opening balance
sheet in accordance with the requirements of purchase accounting. The operations of LSI ADL
Technology are included in the Companys operating results beginning July 23, 2009. The results of
LSI ADL Technology are reported in a separate reportable business segment named the Electronic
Components Segment.
F-46
The recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the acquisition
of AdL Technology were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Financial assets |
|
$ |
2,398 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
3,677 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
3,094 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets |
|
|
4,830 |
|
Financial liabilities |
|
|
(7,426 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total identifiable net assets |
|
|
6,573 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
9,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration |
|
$ |
15,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
A liability of $5,000 was recognized in the opening balance sheet (included in financial
liabilities above) for expected warranty claims on products sold by AdL Technology prior to
acquisition. Additionally, the Company recorded a deferred tax liability of $2,154,000 in the
opening balance sheet related primarily to intangible assets, inventory and fixed asset
depreciation.
LSI ADL Technology Inc. designs, engineers, and manufactures custom designed circuit boards,
assemblies, and sub-assemblies used in various applications including the control of solid-state
LED lighting. With the acquisition of AdL, we made a decision to further establish and advance our
leadership position in LED lighting by vertically integrating our capabilities in connection with
designing, engineering, and producing the solid-state electronics that control and power LEDs. LSI
ADL Technology allows us to stay on the leading edge of product development, while at the same time
provide opportunities to drive down manufacturing costs and control delivery of key components. LSI
ADLs capabilities also have applications in our other LED product lines such as digital
scoreboards, advertising ribbon boards and billboards. The management team and substantially all
employees of the acquired companies remain with LSI ADL Technology.
The results of LSI ADL Technology included in the fiscal 2010 consolidated results of the Company
are net sales of $16,116,000 and net income of $1,448,000.
The consolidated proforma results of the combined entities of LSI Industries and LSI ADL
Technology, had the acquisition date been July 1, 2007, are as follows for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands; unaudited) |
|
Sales |
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated pro forma fiscal 2010 |
|
$ |
255,111 |
|
|
$ |
1,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated pro forma fiscal 2009 |
|
$ |
250,422 |
|
|
$ |
(12,011 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated pro forma fiscal 2008 |
|
$ |
322,674 |
|
|
$ |
(11,663 |
) |
F-47
The fiscal 2010 consolidated pro forma results listed above include pre-tax expenses for
acquisition deal costs and an acquisition-related fair value inventory adjustment, totaling
$1,198,000. Fiscal 2009 and 2008 have no similar pre-tax expenses. These pre-tax expenses are
included in the as reported consolidated fiscal 2010 results.
NOTE 16 SALE OF LSI MARCOLE
On January 20, 2010, the Board of Directors approved a plan to close the LSI Marcole facility in
Manchester, Tennessee. This facility manufactures wire harnesses used in the manufacture of LSIs
light fixtures and also sells wire harness to select outside customers. The Company decided to
sell this facility primarily due to low cost competition of wire harnesses produced outside the
United States. While the Company expected to cease production at the facility by April 2, 2010, an
interested buyer came forward and purchased certain assets and the business of LSI Marcole on March
30, 2010. The Company received $500,000 of the sales proceeds in cash as well as interest bearing
promissory notes in the amount of $669,682 to be paid in full via quarterly payments through June
2011. The Company recorded a $638,747 loss on the sale of certain LSI Marcole assets in cost of
products and services sold in the third quarter of fiscal 2010. Subsequent to the sale of the LSI
Marcole assets, the Company will continue to purchase wire harnesses from the new owner of the
facility pursuant to a manufacturing and supply agreement. The operating results of LSI Marcole
are reported under the All Other Category.
The assets and liabilities of LSI Marcole were comprised of the following on the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
349 |
|
|
$ |
316 |
|
Notes receivable, current portion |
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
|
1,491 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
978 |
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
685 |
|
|
$ |
2,991 |
|
|
$ |
2,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net customer sales and operating (loss) of LSI Marcole for the periods indicated were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,886 |
|
|
$ |
3,970 |
|
|
$ |
3,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,101 |
) |
|
$ |
(614 |
) |
|
$ |
(475 |
) |
F-48
NOTE 17 SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Fiscal |
|
(In thousands except per share data) |
|
Sept. 30 |
|
|
Dec. 31 |
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
Year |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
67,676 |
|
|
$ |
69,374 |
|
|
$ |
53,466 |
|
|
$ |
63,886 |
|
|
$ |
254,402 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
16,597 |
|
|
|
16,300 |
|
|
|
8,873 |
|
|
|
13,963 |
|
|
|
55,733 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
1,637 |
|
|
|
1,592 |
|
|
|
(2,532 |
) |
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
1,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
(.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
(a) |
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
(.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of share prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$ |
8.48 |
|
|
$ |
8.43 |
|
|
$ |
8.42 |
|
|
$ |
7.41 |
|
|
$ |
8.48 |
|
Low |
|
$ |
5.05 |
|
|
$ |
6.52 |
|
|
$ |
5.50 |
|
|
$ |
4.86 |
|
|
$ |
4.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
75,838 |
|
|
$ |
60,787 |
|
|
$ |
46,989 |
|
|
$ |
50,185 |
|
|
$ |
233,799 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
18,179 |
|
|
|
13,257 |
|
|
|
8,774 |
|
|
|
11,617 |
|
|
|
51,827 |
|
Loss contingency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,250 |
|
|
|
957 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
14,467 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
2,687 |
|
|
|
(13,377 |
) |
|
|
(2,467 |
) |
|
|
(257 |
) |
|
|
(13,414 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
(0.61 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.62 |
)(a) |
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
(0.61 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.62 |
)(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of share prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$ |
10.91 |
|
|
$ |
8.28 |
|
|
$ |
7.39 |
|
|
$ |
6.51 |
|
|
$ |
10.91 |
|
Low |
|
$ |
7.02 |
|
|
$ |
4.25 |
|
|
$ |
2.75 |
|
|
$ |
4.15 |
|
|
$ |
2.75 |
|
F-49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Fiscal |
|
(In thousands except per share data) |
|
Sept. 30 |
|
|
Dec. 31 |
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
Year |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
90,001 |
|
|
$ |
84,062 |
|
|
$ |
64,780 |
|
|
$ |
66,443 |
|
|
$ |
305,286 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
25,751 |
|
|
|
23,459 |
|
|
|
15,982 |
|
|
|
15,235 |
|
|
|
80,427 |
|
Loss contingency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
2,800 |
|
Goodwill and
intangible asset impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,955 |
|
|
|
27,955 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
6,953 |
|
|
|
4,823 |
|
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
(25,821 |
) |
|
|
(13,048 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(1.18 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.60 |
)(a) |
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(1.18 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.60 |
)(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of share prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$ |
21.39 |
|
|
$ |
23.05 |
|
|
$ |
18.65 |
|
|
$ |
14.41 |
|
|
$ |
23.05 |
|
Low |
|
$ |
15.70 |
|
|
$ |
17.42 |
|
|
$ |
8.12 |
|
|
$ |
8.04 |
|
|
$ |
8.04 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The total of the earnings per share for each of the four quarters does not equal the total
earnings per share for the full year because the calculations are based on the average shares
outstanding during each of the individual periods. |
At August 19, 2010, there were 502 shareholders of record. The Company believes this represents
approximately 3,000 beneficial shareholders.
F-50
LSI INDUSTRIES INC.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(In thousands except per share data)
The following data has been selected from the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company for
the periods and dates indicated:
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
254,402 |
|
|
$ |
233,799 |
|
|
$ |
305,286 |
|
|
$ |
337,453 |
|
|
$ |
280,470 |
|
Cost of products and services sold |
|
|
198,030 |
|
|
|
181,972 |
|
|
|
224,859 |
|
|
|
248,274 |
|
|
|
209,057 |
|
Loss on sale of a subsidiary |
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
53,671 |
|
|
|
51,571 |
|
|
|
60,642 |
|
|
|
57,219 |
|
|
|
49,898 |
|
Loss contingency (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
(590 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and intangible asset
impairment (b) |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
14,467 |
|
|
|
27,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
1,909 |
|
|
|
(14,411 |
) |
|
|
(10,970 |
) |
|
|
32,550 |
|
|
|
21,515 |
|
Interest (income) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
(360 |
) |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(550 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
1,784 |
|
|
|
(14,403 |
) |
|
|
(10,691 |
) |
|
|
31,727 |
|
|
|
21,987 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
(989 |
) |
|
|
2,357 |
|
|
|
10,938 |
|
|
|
7,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,424 |
|
|
$ |
(13,414 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,048 |
) |
|
$ |
20,789 |
|
|
$ |
14,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
(0.62 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.60 |
) |
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
(0.62 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.60 |
) |
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid per share |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
24,128 |
|
|
|
21,800 |
|
|
|
21,764 |
|
|
|
21,676 |
|
|
|
20,194 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
24,134 |
|
|
|
21,800 |
|
|
|
21,764 |
|
|
|
21,924 |
|
|
|
20,429 |
|
Balance Sheet Data:
(At June 30)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
73,568 |
|
|
$ |
72,500 |
|
|
$ |
72,863 |
|
|
$ |
68,397 |
|
|
$ |
66,787 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
173,845 |
|
|
|
153,118 |
|
|
|
184,214 |
|
|
|
233,612 |
|
|
|
224,401 |
|
Long-term debt,
including current
maturities |
|
|
1,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,593 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
144,218 |
|
|
|
130,473 |
|
|
|
149,190 |
|
|
|
176,061 |
|
|
|
164,985 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The Company recorded loss contingency reserves in fiscal years 2009 and 2008, and reversed a
loss contingency reserve in fiscal 2007 all related to a patent litigation matter. See Note
14. |
|
(b) |
|
The Company recorded a significant impairment of goodwill and intangible assets in fiscal
2009 and 2008. See Note 6. |
F-51
LSI INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009, AND 2008
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COLUMN A |
|
COLUMN B |
|
|
COLUMN C |
|
|
COLUMN D |
|
|
COLUMN E |
|
|
COLUMN F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions |
|
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Charged to |
|
|
from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
Beginning |
|
|
Costs and |
|
|
Acquired |
|
|
(a) |
|
|
End of |
|
Description |
|
of Period |
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
Company |
|
|
Deductions |
|
|
Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
532 |
|
|
$ |
424 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
(566 |
) |
|
$ |
399 |
|
Year Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
585 |
|
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(188 |
) |
|
$ |
532 |
|
Year Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
822 |
|
|
$ |
155 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(392 |
) |
|
$ |
585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory Obsolescence Reserve: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,410 |
|
|
$ |
1,517 |
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
(1,479 |
) |
|
$ |
1,537 |
|
Year Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,638 |
|
|
$ |
1,568 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,796 |
) |
|
$ |
1,410 |
|
Year Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,606 |
|
|
$ |
1,479 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,447 |
) |
|
$ |
1,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Reserve: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,940 |
|
|
$ |
591 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,531 |
|
Year Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,819 |
|
|
$ |
121 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,940 |
|
Year Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,819 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,819 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
For Allowance for Doubtful Accounts, deductions are uncollectible accounts charged off, less
recoveries. |
F-52