e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended July 1, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number: 000-24923
CONEXANT SYSTEMS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
25-1799439 |
(State of incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
4000 MacArthur Boulevard
Newport Beach, California 92660-3095
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
(949) 483-4600
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes o No þ Explanatory Note:
While the registrant is not subject to the filing requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act, it has filed all reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during
the preceding 12 months.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer þ
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of August 15, 2011, there were 100,000,000 shares of the registrants common stock outstanding.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
that are intended to qualify for the safe harbor from liability established by the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any statements that do not relate to historical or
current facts or matters are forward-looking statements. You can identify some of the
forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking words, such as may, will, could,
project, believe, anticipate, expect, estimate, continue, potential, plan,
forecasts, and the like, the negatives of such expressions, or the use of future tense..
Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning:
|
|
|
our expectations regarding the market share of our products, growth in the markets we serve and our market opportunities; |
|
|
|
|
our expectations regarding the price of our products, and product competition; |
|
|
|
|
our expectations regarding the continued and future demand for our products; |
|
|
|
|
our expectations regarding the declines in our legacy products; |
|
|
|
|
our plans and expectations regarding the transition of our semiconductor products to smaller line width geometries; |
|
|
|
|
our expectation that we will be able to sustain the recoverability of our goodwill, intangible and tangible long-term assets; |
|
|
|
|
our product development plans; |
|
|
|
|
our expectation that our largest customers will continue to account for a substantial portion of our revenue; |
|
|
|
|
our expectations regarding our contractual obligations and commitments; |
|
|
|
|
our expectation that we will be able to protect our products and services with proprietary technology and intellectual
property protection; |
|
|
|
|
our expectation that we will be able to meet our lease obligations (and other financial commitments); |
|
|
|
|
our expectations, subject to the qualifications expressed, regarding the sufficiency of our existing sources of liquidity,
together with cash expected to be generated from operations, to fund our operations, research and development, anticipated
capital expenditures, and working capital for at least the next twelve months; |
|
|
|
|
our expectation that we will be able to continue to rely on third party manufacturers to manufacture, assemble and test our
products to meet our customers demands; and |
|
|
|
|
our expectations that we will be able to use our net operating losses and other tax attributes to offset future taxable income. |
Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results
to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. You are urged to
carefully review the disclosures we make concerning risks and other factors that may affect our
business and operating results, including, but not limited to, those made under the heading Risk
Factors in Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, those made under the heading
Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2010 which was filed with
the SEC on November 9, 2010, and those made in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC). Please consider our forward-looking statements in light of those risks as
you read this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this document. We do not intend, and
undertake no obligation, to publish revised forward-looking statements to reflect events or
circumstances after the date of this document or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events,
except as required by law.
1
CONEXANT SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONEXANT SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except for par value)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
50,408 |
|
|
|
$ |
54,466 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,059 |
|
Receivables, net of
allowance of $181 and $368
at July 1, 2011 and October
1, 2010, respectively |
|
|
24,220 |
|
|
|
|
31,463 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
19,667 |
|
|
|
|
8,747 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
8,750 |
|
|
|
|
14,690 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
103,045 |
|
|
|
|
142,484 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
of accumulated depreciation of
$820 and $30,050 at
July 1, 2011 and October 1,
2010, respectively |
|
|
11,634 |
|
|
|
|
6,080 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
222,661 |
|
|
|
|
109,908 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
113,774 |
|
|
|
|
4,308 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
23,778 |
|
|
|
|
43,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
474,892 |
|
|
|
$ |
305,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,978 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
11,377 |
|
|
|
|
12,516 |
|
Accrued compensation and
benefits |
|
|
8,701 |
|
|
|
|
7,682 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
29,373 |
|
|
|
|
31,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
49,451 |
|
|
|
|
63,012 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
194,249 |
|
|
|
|
173,543 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
69,100 |
|
|
|
|
57,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
312,800 |
|
|
|
|
293,752 |
|
Commitments and contingencies
(Note 6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred and junior
preferred stock: zero and
20,000 shares authorized at
July 1, 2011
and October 1, 2010,
respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par
value: 200,000 shares
authorized; 100,000 and
81,273
shares issued and
outstanding at July 1,
2011 and October 1,
2010, respectively |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
813 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
202,865 |
|
|
|
|
4,919,582 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(41,838 |
) |
|
|
|
(4,909,509 |
) |
Accumulated other
comprehensive income |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
1,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders
equity |
|
|
162,092 |
|
|
|
|
12,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity |
|
$ |
474,892 |
|
|
|
$ |
305,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements
3
CONEXANT SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
Period from April |
|
|
|
Period from April 2, |
|
|
Fiscal Quarter |
|
|
|
20, 2011 through |
|
|
|
2011 through |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
July 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
April 19, 2011 |
|
|
July 2, 2010 |
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
37,009 |
|
|
|
$ |
3,872 |
|
|
$ |
60,730 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
33,327 |
|
|
|
|
2,233 |
|
|
|
23,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
3,682 |
|
|
|
|
1,639 |
|
|
|
37,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
11,646 |
|
|
|
|
2,822 |
|
|
|
14,569 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
7,626 |
|
|
|
|
1,867 |
|
|
|
11,647 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
4,826 |
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
Special charges |
|
|
12,580 |
|
|
|
|
5,660 |
|
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
36,678 |
|
|
|
|
10,402 |
|
|
|
27,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income |
|
|
(32,996 |
) |
|
|
|
(8,763 |
) |
|
|
9,861 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
3,115 |
|
|
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
|
7,159 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
3,812 |
|
|
|
|
3,778 |
|
|
|
9,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes and loss on equity method investments |
|
|
(39,923 |
) |
|
|
|
(13,595 |
) |
|
|
(6,546 |
) |
Income tax provision (benefit) |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before loss on equity method investments |
|
|
(40,152 |
) |
|
|
|
(13,565 |
) |
|
|
(6,868 |
) |
Loss on equity method investments |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(40,158 |
) |
|
|
|
(13,565 |
) |
|
|
(6,998 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(1,680 |
) |
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(455 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(41,838 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(13,637 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,453 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share from continuing operations basic and diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share from discontinued operations basic and diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share basic and diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.17 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in basic and diluted per-share computations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,223 |
|
|
|
81,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements
4
CONEXANT SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
Period from April 20, |
|
|
|
Period from October 2, |
|
|
Nine Fiscal Months |
|
|
|
2011 through |
|
|
|
2010 through |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
July 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
April 19, 2011 |
|
|
July 2, 2010 |
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
37,009 |
|
|
|
$ |
93,111 |
|
|
$ |
184,411 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
33,327 |
|
|
|
|
39,849 |
|
|
|
71,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
3,682 |
|
|
|
|
53,262 |
|
|
|
112,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
11,646 |
|
|
|
|
30,932 |
|
|
|
41,914 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
7,626 |
|
|
|
|
24,155 |
|
|
|
36,730 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
4,826 |
|
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
965 |
|
Gain on sale of intellectual property |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,249 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Special charges |
|
|
12,580 |
|
|
|
|
20,890 |
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
36,678 |
|
|
|
|
75,349 |
|
|
|
80,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income |
|
|
(32,996 |
) |
|
|
|
(22,087 |
) |
|
|
32,007 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
3,115 |
|
|
|
|
12,278 |
|
|
|
24,437 |
|
Other expense (income), net |
|
|
3,812 |
|
|
|
|
8,423 |
|
|
|
(5,711 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes and (loss)
income on equity method investments |
|
|
(39,923 |
) |
|
|
|
(42,788 |
) |
|
|
13,281 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before (loss) income on equity
method investments |
|
|
(40,152 |
) |
|
|
|
(43,168 |
) |
|
|
12,858 |
|
(Loss) income on equity method investments |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
1,495 |
|
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
|
(40,158 |
) |
|
|
|
(41,673 |
) |
|
|
12,483 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(1,680 |
) |
|
|
|
(461 |
) |
|
|
(723 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(41,838 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(42,134 |
) |
|
$ |
11,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income per share from continuing operations basic and diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.51 |
) |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share from discontinued operations basic and diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income per share basic and diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.51 |
) |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in basic per-share computations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,996 |
|
|
|
70,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in diluted per-share computations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,996 |
|
|
|
70,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements
5
CONEXANT SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
Period from April 20, |
|
|
|
Period from October |
|
|
Nine Fiscal Months |
|
|
|
2011 through |
|
|
|
2, 2010 through |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
July 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
April 19, 2011 |
|
|
July 2, 2010 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(41,838 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(42,134 |
) |
|
$ |
11,760 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
766 |
|
|
|
|
1,425 |
|
|
|
2,646 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
4,826 |
|
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
965 |
|
Reversal of provision for bad debts, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
Charges for inventory provisions, net |
|
|
1,270 |
|
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Provision for loss on inventory purchase commitments |
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Release of inventory step-up upon shipment |
|
|
16,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of debt (premium) discount |
|
|
(876 |
) |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
7,785 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,057 |
|
|
|
5,025 |
|
Decrease (increase) in fair value of derivative instruments |
|
|
3,757 |
|
|
|
|
9,469 |
|
|
|
(11,353 |
) |
Losses (gains) on equity method investments |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
(1,495 |
) |
|
|
1,229 |
|
Loss on termination of swap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,728 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,581 |
|
Net gain on sale of equity securities |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
(1,393 |
) |
|
|
(12,911 |
) |
Gain on sale of intellectual property |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,249 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other items, net |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
|
(1,386 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
1,310 |
|
|
|
|
6,071 |
|
|
|
(6,082 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
3,351 |
|
|
|
|
(6,291 |
) |
|
|
(181 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(2,733 |
) |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
(9,405 |
) |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
5,829 |
|
|
|
|
(5,269 |
) |
|
|
(327 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
3,751 |
|
|
|
|
2,764 |
|
|
|
(1,897 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
|
(3,348 |
) |
|
|
|
(31,237 |
) |
|
|
6,280 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(631 |
) |
|
|
|
(729 |
) |
|
|
(836 |
) |
Acquisition of Predecessor |
|
|
(203,865 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of real estate, net of closing costs of $439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
741 |
|
Payments for acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(625 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
88,634 |
|
Purchases of marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95,334 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of equity securities |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
|
|
Release of restricted cash |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
8,500 |
|
Proceeds from sale of intellectual property |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(204,460 |
) |
|
|
|
42,994 |
|
|
|
1,080 |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net repayments of short-term debt, including debt costs of $60 and $483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,278 |
) |
|
|
(29,136 |
) |
Extinguishment of long-term debt, including costs of $3,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(288,747 |
) |
Proceeds from common stock offerings, net of expenses of $4,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,510 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of senior secured notes, net of expenses of $4,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,442 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under employee stock plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Repurchase of shares upon exercise of employee stock awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(689 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
Advances
(to) from Gold Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
(6,443 |
) |
|
|
|
6,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity contributions |
|
|
203,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
197,422 |
|
|
|
|
(5,429 |
) |
|
|
(86,947 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(10,386 |
) |
|
|
|
6,328 |
|
|
|
(79,587 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
60,794 |
|
|
|
|
54,466 |
|
|
|
125,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
50,408 |
|
|
|
$ |
60,794 |
|
|
$ |
45,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements
6
CONEXANT SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (SUCCESSOR)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Income (net of |
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
tax) |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance at April 20, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,838 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,838 |
) |
Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,773 |
) |
Equity contribution |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
202,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 1, 2011 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
202,865 |
|
|
$ |
(41,838 |
) |
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
162,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (PREDECESSOR)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Income (net of |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
tax) |
|
|
(Deficit) |
|
Balance at October 1, 2010 |
|
|
81,273 |
|
|
$ |
813 |
|
|
$ |
4,919,582 |
|
|
$ |
(4,909,509 |
) |
|
$ |
1,206 |
|
|
$ |
12,092 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,134 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,134 |
) |
Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
Change in unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,621 |
) |
Common stock issued related to employee stock plans |
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
Employee stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 19, 2011 |
|
|
82,223 |
|
|
$ |
823 |
|
|
$ |
4,923,035 |
|
|
$ |
(4,951,643 |
) |
|
$ |
1,719 |
|
|
$ |
(26,066 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements
7
CONEXANT SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
Conexant Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, (Conexant or the Company) designs, develops and
sells semiconductor system solutions, comprised of semiconductor devices, software and reference
designs, for imaging, audio, embedded-modem, and video applications. These solutions include a
comprehensive portfolio of imaging solutions for multifunction printers (MFPs), fax platforms, and
interactive display frame market segments. The Companys audio solutions include high-definition
(HD) audio integrated circuits, HD audio codecs, and speakers-on-a-chip solutions for personal
computers, PC peripheral sound systems, audio subsystems, speakers, notebook docking stations,
voice-over-IP speakerphones, USB headsets supporting Microsoft Office Communicator and Skype, and
audio-enabled surveillance applications. The Company also offers a full suite of embedded-modem
solutions for set-top boxes, point-of-sale systems, home automation and security systems, and
desktop and notebook PCs. Additional products include decoders and media bridges for video
surveillance security and monitoring applications, and system solutions for analog video-based
multimedia applications.
Merger with Conexant Holdings, Inc.
On April 19, 2011, the Company completed a
merger with Gold Acquisition Corp., a Delaware
corporation (Merger Sub) and a wholly owned subsidiary of Gold Holdings, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, subsequently renamed Conexant Holdings, Inc. (Conexant Holdings). Pursuant to the
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of February 20, 2011, by and among the Company, Gold
Holdings, Inc. and Merger Sub (the Merger Agreement), Merger Sub was merged with and into the
Company, with the Company surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of Conexant Holdings (the
Merger). In connection with the Merger, shares of the Companys common stock ceased to be traded
on the NASDAQ Stock Market after close of market on April 19, 2011.
At the consummation of the Merger, each share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the
Company (the Company Common Stock) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time
of the Merger (the Effective Time) was converted into the right to receive $2.40 in cash, without interest and subject to any applicable withholding tax
(the Gold Merger Consideration). Stock options to acquire Company Common Stock that were outstanding and unexercised immediately
prior to the Effective Time were cancelled and converted into the right to receive, with respect to
each such option, an amount of cash equal to the excess, if any, of the Gold Merger Consideration
over the exercise price per share under the option for each share subject to such option. Any
option with an exercise price greater than or equal to the Gold Merger Consideration was cancelled
without consideration. Each restricted stock unit (RSU) that, as of immediately prior to the
Effective Time, was outstanding and held by a non-employee director of the Company or a
management-level employee of the Company at the rank of senior vice president or above was
cancelled and converted into the right to receive an amount of cash equal to the Gold Merger
Consideration. All remaining RSUs were cancelled with the Holders of such RSUs being entitled to
receive with respect to each RSU on the date that the RSU would have otherwise vested had the
Effective Time not occurred an amount of cash equal to the Gold Merger Consideration; provided that
such payment will only be required if (a) the employee continues to be employed continuously by the
surviving corporation through and including the original vesting date of such RSUs and (b) the
employee has not otherwise been issued or granted any incentive compensation following the
Effective Time (but prior to such original vesting date) that the surviving corporations board of
directors has determined in good faith in its sole discretion to be an appropriate replacement for
such RSUs.
The aggregate consideration for all equity securities including cancelled and converted stock
options and RSUs of the Company was $203.8 million. An additional $0.1 million consideration was
paid concurrent with the Merger to satisfy an existing bank line of credit. The Merger was funded
with the proceeds of equity contributions from Golden Gate Capital and affiliated entities in the
amount of $203.9 million.
Termination of Merger Agreement with Standard Microsystems Corporation
On February 23, 2011, the Company terminated its previously announced Agreement and Plan of Merger,
dated January 9, 2011 (the SMSC Agreement), with Standard Microsystems Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (SMSC), and Comet Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned
subsidiary of SMSC. Pursuant to the terms of the SMSC Agreement, the Company paid a termination fee
of $7.7 million to SMSC.
Interim Reporting The unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the
Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been
eliminated.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2010. The financial information presented in the
accompanying statements reflects all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary
for a fair statement of the periods indicated. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring
nature. The year-end balance sheet data was derived from the audited consolidated financial
statements.
8
Fiscal Periods The Companys fiscal year is the 52- or 53-week period ending on the Friday
closest to September 30. In a 52-week year, each fiscal quarter consists of 13 weeks. The
additional week in a 53-week year is added to the fourth quarter, making such quarter consist of 14
weeks. Fiscal 2011 consists of, and fiscal 2010 consisted of, 52 weeks.
For the purposes of presentation and disclosure, all references to Predecessor relate to Conexant
Systems, Inc. for periods prior to the Merger. All references to Successor relate to Conexant
Systems, Inc. merged with Merger Sub for periods subsequent to the Merger. References to we,
us, our, Conexant and the Company relate to the Predecessor for the periods prior to the
Merger and to the Successor for periods subsequent to the Merger.
Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States (US GAAP) requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements
and accompanying notes. Among the significant estimates affecting the consolidated financial
statements are those related to fair-value measurements applied to tangible and intangible assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with the Merger, revenue recognition, allowance for
doubtful accounts, reserves related to inventories and sales returns, long-lived assets (including
goodwill and intangible assets), deferred income taxes, valuation of warrants, stock-based
compensation and restructuring charges. On an ongoing basis, management reviews its estimates based
upon currently available information. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition The Company recognizes revenue when (i) persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred, (iii) the sales price and terms are fixed and
determinable, and (iv) the collection of the receivable is reasonably assured. These terms are
typically met upon shipment of product to the customer. The majority of the Companys distributors
have limited stock rotation rights, which allow them to rotate up to 10% of product in their
inventory two times per year. The Company recognizes revenue to these distributors upon shipment of
product to the distributor, as the stock rotation rights are limited and the Company
believes that it has the ability to reasonably estimate and establish allowances for expected
product returns in accordance with the accounting guidance for revenue recognition when right of
return exists. Development revenue is recognized when services are performed and was not
significant for any periods presented.
Marketable Securities The Company defines marketable securities as income-yielding debt
securities that can be readily converted into cash and equity securities acquired through strategic
non-marketable investments that subsequently became listed on public markets. All of the Companys
marketable debt securities are U.S. Treasury obligations rated Aaa or AAA by the major credit
rating agencies.
The Company accounts for its investments in marketable securities as available-for-sale and
determines the appropriate classification of such securities at the time of purchase and
re-evaluates such classification as of each balance sheet date. Marketable securities are reported
at fair value with the related unrealized gains and losses included in accumulated other
comprehensive income, a component of shareholders equity, on the Companys consolidated balance
sheets. Realized gains and losses are included in other expense (income), net in the accompanying
unaudited consolidated statements of operations. Gains and losses on the sale of available-for-sale
securities are determined using the specific-identification method. The Company does not hold any
securities for speculative or trading purposes.
Restricted Cash The Company has outstanding letters of credit collateralized by restricted cash
aggregating $5.1 million and $5.6 million as of July 1, 2011 and October 1, 2010, respectively, to
secure various long-term operating leases and the Companys self-insured workers compensation
plan. The restricted cash associated with these letters of credit is classified as other long-term
assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
Inventories On a quarterly basis, the Company assesses the net realizable value of its
inventories. When the estimated average selling prices, less cost to sell its inventory, falls
below its inventory cost, the Company adjusts its inventory to its current estimated market value.
Lower of cost or market adjustments may be required based upon actual average selling prices and
changes to the Companys current estimates, which could impact the Companys gross margin
percentage. The Company recorded a lower of cost or market adjustment
of $0.2 million in the period from April 20, 2011 through July 1,
2011 reflecting a price decrease on certain inventory. There were no
lower of cost or market adjustments in any other period presented.
Investments The Company accounts for non-marketable investments using the equity method of
accounting if the investment gives the Company the ability to exercise significant influence over,
but not control of, an investee. Significant influence generally exists if the Company has an
ownership interest representing between 20% and 50% of the voting stock of the investee. Under the
equity method of accounting, investments are stated at initial cost and are adjusted for subsequent
additional investments and the Companys proportionate share of earnings or losses and
distributions. Additional investments by other parties in the investee will result in a reduction
in the Companys ownership interest, and the resulting gain or loss will be recorded in the
consolidated statements of operations. Where the Company is unable to exercise significant
influence over the investee, investments are accounted for under the cost method, except for
investments in limited partnerships, for which the Company uses the equity method. Under the cost
method, investments are carried at cost and adjusted only for other-than-temporary declines in fair
value, return of capital or additional investments.
Accounting for Convertible Debt The Company has adopted the accounting guidance for convertible
debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement).
This guidance requires the issuer to separately account for the liability and equity components of
convertible debt instruments in a manner that reflects the issuers hypothetical nonconvertible
debt borrowing rate. The
guidance resulted in the Company recognizing higher interest expense in the statement of operations
due to amortization of the discount that results from
9
separating the
liability and equity
components. The accounting guidance applies to our 4.00% convertible subordinated notes
(convertible notes) issued in 2006. The Company redeemed the remaining $11.2 million of
convertible notes on March 1, 2011.
Derivative Financial Instruments The Companys derivative financial instruments as of July 1,
2011 consisted of the Companys warrant to purchase 6.1 million shares of Mindspeed Technologies,
Inc. (Mindspeed) common stock. Gains and losses on the warrant are included in other expense
(income), net.
Supplemental Cash Flow Information There was no cash paid for interest in the period from April
20, 2011 through July 1, 2011. Cash paid for interest for the period from October 2, 2010 through
April 19, 2011 and the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010 was $10.2 million and $7.0 million,
respectively. Cash paid for income taxes for the period from April 20, 2011 to July 1, 2011 was
$0.2 million. Cash paid for income taxes for the period from October 2, 2010 to April 19, 2011 and
the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010 was $0.4 million and $2.2 million, respectively.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Accumulated Other comprehensive income includes
foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains on marketable securities. The
components of accumulated other comprehensive income are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
1,193 |
|
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
1,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Loss) Income Per Share Net (loss) income per share is computed in accordance with the
accounting guidance for earnings per share. Basic net (loss) income per share is computed by
dividing net (loss) income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the
period. Diluted net (loss) income per share is computed by dividing net (loss) income by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding and potentially dilutive securities
outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive securities include stock options, restricted
stock units and shares of stock issuable upon conversion of the Companys convertible notes. The
dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock units is computed under the treasury stock
method, and the dilutive effect of convertible notes is computed using the if-converted method.
Potentially dilutive securities are excluded from the computations of diluted net (loss) income per
share if their effect would be antidilutive.
The following potentially dilutive securities have been excluded from the diluted net (loss) income
per share calculations because their effect would have been antidilutive (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
Period from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2, 2011 |
|
|
Fiscal Quarter |
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
Nine Fiscal |
|
|
|
through |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
through |
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 19, 2011 |
|
|
July 2, 2010 |
|
|
April 19, 2011 |
|
|
July 2, 2010 |
|
Employee stock options and restricted stock units |
|
|
2,044 |
|
|
|
1,139 |
|
|
|
1,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.00% convertible subordinated notes due March 2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,046 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
3,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,044 |
|
|
|
2,185 |
|
|
|
1,440 |
|
|
|
3,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following potentially dilutive securities have been included in the diluted net (loss)
income per share calculations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
Period from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2, 2011 |
|
|
Fiscal Quarter |
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
Nine Fiscal |
|
|
|
through |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
through |
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 19, 2011 |
|
|
July 2, 2010 |
|
|
April 19, 2011 |
|
|
July 2, 2010 |
|
Weighted average shares for basic net (loss) income per share |
|
|
82,223 |
|
|
|
81,200 |
|
|
|
81,996 |
|
|
|
70,120 |
|
Employee stock options and restricted stock units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares for diluted (loss) income per share |
|
|
82,223 |
|
|
|
81,200 |
|
|
|
81,996 |
|
|
|
70,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of Assets The Company periodically reviews long-lived assets and intangible
assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amounts may not be recoverable. If an asset is considered to be impaired, the impairment loss is
recognized immediately and is considered to be the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset
exceeds its fair value.
10
The Company did not conduct an impairment review as of July 1, 2011, due to the relatively short
time period between the Merger consummation date and the period end date. The Company has not
recognized any impairment loss for any long-lived or intangible asset as of July 1, 2011.
Goodwill Goodwill is tested annually during the fourth fiscal quarter and, if necessary,
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be
recoverable. During the third fiscal quarter of 2011, based on current business forecasts, the
Company determined there were no indicators of impairment and therefore no interim goodwill
impairment analysis was considered necessary for this period.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, (FASB), issued guidance regarding the
presentation of comprehensive income. The new standard requires the presentation of comprehensive
income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a
single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements.
The new standard also requires presentation of adjustments for items that are reclassified from
other comprehensive income to net income in the statement where the components of net income and
the components of other comprehensive income are presented. The updated guidance is effective on a
retrospective basis for financial statements issued for fiscal years, and interim periods within
those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this guidance will not have
a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
In May 2011, the FASB issued additional guidance on fair value measurements that clarifies the
application of existing guidance and disclosure requirements, changes certain fair value
measurement principles and requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements. The
updated guidance is effective on a prospective basis for financial statements issued for fiscal
years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The
adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
In December 2010, the FASB issued an update to modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for
reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is
required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a
goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill
impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors
indicating that an impairment may exist. The qualitative factors are consistent with the existing
guidance, which requires that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment between annual
tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair
value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. This accounting
guidance will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2010, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is not permitted.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on its financial position and
results of operations.
2. Merger with Conexant Holdings, Inc.
The Merger is being accounted for as a business combination using the acquisition method of
accounting, whereby the purchase price was preliminarily allocated to tangible and intangible
assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based on their estimated fair market values. Fair-value
measurements have been applied based on assumptions that market participants would use in the
pricing of the asset or liability. The following table summarizes the fair value assigned to the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of April 19, 2011, the acquisition date (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total merger consideration: |
|
|
|
|
Cash paid to shareholders |
|
$ |
197,335 |
|
Cash paid to holders of cancelled stock options and RSUs upon change of control |
|
|
6,427 |
|
Bank line of credit assumed and repaid |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total merger consideration |
|
|
203,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed: |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
60,794 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
25,530 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
40,573 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
8,582 |
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
11,866 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
118,600 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
28,366 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(14,215 |
) |
Deferred income tax liabilities, net |
|
|
(21,655 |
) |
Other liabilities current and long term |
|
|
(82,113 |
) |
Long-term debt |
|
|
(195,125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net liabilities assumed |
|
|
(18,797 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess purchase price atttributed to goodwill acquired |
|
$ |
222,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
11
The preliminary fair value of the acquired intangible assets was determined using the following income valuation approaches. In estimating the preliminary fair value of the acquired intangible
assets, the Company utilized the valuation methodology determined to be most appropriate for the
individual intangible asset being valued as described below. The acquired intangible assets include
the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Useful |
|
|
|
Valuation Method |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Life (yrs) (1) |
|
Customer relationships |
|
Multi-Period Excess Earnings (2) |
|
$ |
50,300 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
In-process research and development (IPR&D) |
|
Multi-Period Excess Earnings (2) |
|
|
46,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade name and trademarks |
|
Relief-from-Royalty (3) |
|
|
15,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog |
|
Multi-Period Excess Earnings (2) |
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Patents |
|
Relief-from-Royalty (3) |
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
Non-compete agreement |
|
Comparative Business Valuation (4) |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchased intangible assets |
|
|
|
$ |
118,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Determination of the estimated useful lives of the individual
categories of purchased intangible assets was based on the nature of the
applicable intangible asset and the expected future cash flows to be derived
from the intangible asset. Amortization of intangible assets with definite
lives are recognized over the shorter of the respective lives of the agreement
or the period of time the assets are expected to contribute to future cash
flows.
(2) The Multi-Period Excess Earnings method is a discounted cash flow method
within the income approach which estimates a purchased intangible asset value
based on the present value of the projected excess net cash flows derived from
the operations of the business. The value attributed to customer relationship
and backlog intangible assets was based on projected net cash inflows from
existing contracts or relationships. The value attributed to IPR&D intangible
assets was based on projected net cash inflows from estimates for projects
under development.
(3) The Relief-from-Royalty method is a discounted cash flow method within the
income approach which calculates the value attributable to owning the trade
name, trademarks and patents as opposed to paying a third-party for their use.
(4) The Comparative Business Valuation method is a discounted cash flow method
within the income approach where the value of the intangible asset is estimated
based on the difference in value with and without the non-compete agreement in
place.
Some of the more significant estimates and assumptions inherent in the estimate of the fair value
of the identifiable purchased intangible assets include all assumptions associated with forecasting
cash flows and profitability. The primary assumptions used for the determination of the preliminary
fair value of the purchased intangible assets were generally based upon the present value of
anticipated cash flows discounted at risk adjusted rates of approximately 15-16.5%, based on the
Companys weighted average cost of capital. Estimated years of projected earnings generally follow
the range of estimated remaining useful lives for each intangible asset class.
As of April 19, 2011, the purchase price allocation is preliminary and could change materially in
subsequent periods. Any subsequent changes to the purchase price allocation that result in material
changes to the Companys consolidated financial results will be adjusted retrospectively. Based on
the preliminary purchase price allocation none of the excess purchase price attributed to goodwill
is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
At the time of the Merger, the Company believed its market position and future growth potential for
its semiconductor system solutions business were the primary factors that contributed to a total
purchase price that resulted in the recognition of goodwill.
Transaction Costs:
In the period from April 2, 2011 through April 19, 2011 and October 2, 2010 through April 19, 2011
the Company recorded $5.3 million and $16.9 million, respectively, in Merger related transaction
costs for accounting, investment banking, legal and other costs including a $7.7 million
termination fee to SMSC upon termination of the SMSC Agreement. In the period from April 20, 2011
through July 1, 2011 the Company paid $0.4 million in transaction costs.
Pro Forma Financial Information:
The following unaudited pro forma results of operations assume that the Merger had occurred on
October 2, 2010 for the nine fiscal months ended July 1, 2011 and October 3, 2009 for the nine
fiscal months ended July 2, 2010 after giving effect to acquisition accounting adjustments relating
12
to depreciation and amortization of the revalued assets, and other acquisition-related adjustments
in connection with the Merger. These unaudited pro forma results exclude transaction costs incurred
in connection with the Merger. This unaudited pro forma information should not be relied upon as
necessarily being indicative of the historical results that would have been obtained if the Merger
had actually occurred on those dates, nor of the results that may be obtained in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Results of Operations |
|
|
|
Nine Fiscal Months |
|
Nine Fiscal Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
|
|
July 1, 2011 |
|
July 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
130,120 |
|
$ |
184,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(68,807 |
) |
$ |
(3,959 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Sale of Real Property
On December 22, 2010, the Company sold certain real property adjacent to its Newport Beach,
California headquarters to Uptown Newport L.P. for $23.5 million, which consisted of $21.5 million
in cash and a limited partnership interest in the property, which the Company has valued at $2.0
million. The property primarily consists of approximately 25 acres of land, and included two leased
buildings, improvements and site development costs. The net book value of the property sold was as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Land |
|
$ |
1,662 |
|
Land and leasehold improvements, net |
|
|
356 |
|
Buildings, net |
|
|
5,610 |
|
Machinery and equipment, net |
|
|
262 |
|
Site development costs |
|
|
7,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has continuing involvement with the property related to groundwater and soil
remediation, and therefore at the time of the sale deferred the gain of $6.9 million on the
monetary portion of the proceeds of the transaction, net of transaction costs of $0.4 million. The
deferred gain was eliminated in the Merger purchase price allocation. Responsibility for soil
remediation was transferred to Uptown Newport L.P. with the Company retaining certain obligations
to assist in the soil remediation process for up to five years (or earlier under certain
circumstances set forth in the agreement between the parties). Responsibility for groundwater
remediation remains with the Company in perpetuity, however, upon receipt of a No Further Action
letter (NFA Letter) from the appropriate government regulator indicating that the remediation is
substantially complete is an indication that the risk of discovery of additional groundwater
contamination is remote. The Company has accrued $2.0 million of reserves as of July 1, 2011 based on managements best estimate
of remaining remediation costs, of which $1.0 million is classified in long-term other liabilities.
The Company retained an approximately 7.5% limited partnership interest in the property that is
recognized at an estimated fair value of $2.0 million. The limited partnership interest holds its
limited partnership interest in Uptown Newport L.P., which will own, operate and develop the real property sold by the Company in December 2010. The Company has the option to sell its
partnership interest to the developer at $2.0 million plus a 12% return, if Uptown Newport L.P
obtains certain financing. The $2.0 million fair market value is derived in large part based on
our expectation that the Company will be able to exercise its put option to sell its interest in
the partnership within the next 12 months.
4. Fair Value of Certain Financial Assets and Liabilities
Level 1 financial assets and liabilities consist of unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that
are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities. The
Companys cash equivalents consist primarily of funds in money market accounts, which are
classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Cash equivalents at July 1, 2011 and October
1, 2010 were $32.9 million and $41.9 million, respectively.
Level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of inputs other than quoted prices included within
Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. The Company
had no financial assets or liabilities classified as Level 2 as of July 1, 2011. The Company had
marketable securities of $20.1 million as of October 1, 2010.
Level 3 financial assets and liabilities consist of inputs that are both significant to the fair
value measurement and unobservable, and consist of the Companys warrant to purchase approximately
6.1 million shares of Mindspeed common stock at an exercise price of $16.74 per share through June
2013. The fair value of the Mindspeed warrant was $7.5 million and $20.7 million as of July 1, 2011
and October 1, 2010, respectively.
13
The fair value of other financial instruments, which consist of the Companys 11.25% senior secured
notes due 2015, was $198.2 million as of July 1, 2011. The fair value of the 11.25% senior secured
notes is based on an indicative bid price provided by the underwriter of the senior secured notes,
and was 113.25% of par as of July 1, 2011.
5. Supplemental Financial Information
Inventories
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
$ |
14,154 |
|
|
$ |
4,840 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
5,513 |
|
|
|
3,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
$ |
19,667 |
|
|
$ |
8,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net inventory as of July 1, 2011 includes $9.7 million step-up to fair value recorded in
connection with the Merger, $8.5 million and $1.2 million recorded in work-in-process and finished
goods, respectively.
Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
July 1, 2011 |
|
|
October 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Book |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Book |
|
|
|
Life (yrs) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Life (yrs) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
$ |
50,300 |
|
|
$ |
(2,084 |
) |
|
$ |
48,216 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
4,300 |
|
|
$ |
(3,121 |
) |
|
$ |
1,179 |
|
Backlog |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
|
(2,652 |
) |
|
|
1,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
2,830 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
3,900 |
|
|
|
(1,333 |
) |
|
|
2,567 |
|
Software licenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
(438 |
) |
|
|
562 |
|
Non-compete agreement |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
57,500 |
|
|
$ |
(4,826 |
) |
|
$ |
52,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,230 |
|
|
$ |
(4,922 |
) |
|
$ |
4,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets not subject to amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In-process research and development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade name and trademarks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
61,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives either on a straight-line or
accelerated basis that reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible assets
are expected to be realized, which range from approximately six months to eight years, with no
residual value. During the period from April 20, 2011 through July 1, 2011, the Company recognized
intangible amortization expense of $4.8 million. During the period from April 2, 2011 through
April 19, 2011, and the period from October 2, 2010 through April 19, 2011, the Company recognized
intangible amortization expense of $0.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively. During the fiscal
quarter and nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010, the Company recognized intangible amortization
expense of $0.3 million and $1.0 million, respectively.
Intangible assets are amortized over a weighted-average remaining period of approximately 6.7
years. Annual amortization expense is expected to be as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ending |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
Amortization expense |
|
$ |
4,259 |
|
|
$ |
11,713 |
|
|
$ |
9,630 |
|
|
$ |
7,954 |
|
|
$ |
6,585 |
|
|
$ |
12,533 |
|
Acquired IPR&D intangible assets consist of projects in the Companys audio, imaging and video
product lines. All of the projects were in the development phase and were incomplete at the Merger
date. If the IPR&D projects reach technological feasibility they will be amortized over their
remaining estimated useful lives or, if they do not reach technological feasibility their cost will
be charged to expense. Cash flows from
14
IPR&D intangible assets in fiscal 2011 consist of project
expenses. Revenues and gross margin contribution are not expected from IPR&D intangible assets
until fiscal 2012.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the periods ended July 1, 2011 and October 1,
2010, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Period Ended |
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
April 19, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Goodwill at beginning of period |
|
$ |
109,908 |
|
|
$ |
109,908 |
|
|
$ |
109,908 |
|
Predecessor goodwill eliminated in purchase accounting |
|
$ |
(109,908 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Excess purchase price atttributed to goodwill acquired |
|
|
222,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill at end of period |
|
$ |
222,661 |
|
|
$ |
109,908 |
|
|
$ |
109,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mindspeed Warrant
The Company has a warrant to purchase approximately 6.1 million shares of Mindspeed common stock at
an exercise price of $16.74 per share through June 2013. At July 1, 2011 and October 1, 2010, the
market value of Mindspeed common stock was $8.04 and $7.73 per share, respectively. The Company
accounts for the Mindspeed warrant as a derivative instrument, and changes in the fair value of the
warrant are included in other expense (income), net for each period. At July 1, 2011 and October 1,
2010, the aggregate fair value of the Mindspeed warrant included on the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets was $7.5 million and $20.7 million, respectively. At July 1, 2011, the warrant was
valued using the Black-Scholes-Merton model with an expected term of 2 years, expected volatility
of 65%, a risk-free interest rate of approximately 0.5% and no dividend yield. The aggregate fair
value of the warrant is reflected as a long-term asset on the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets because the Company does not intend to liquidate any portion of the warrant in the next
twelve months.
The valuation of this derivative instrument is subjective, and option valuation models require the
input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility. Changes in
these assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate. The Company could, at any point in
time, ultimately realize amounts significantly different than the carrying value.
Debt
Debt consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
| |
Predecessor |
|
|
|
July 1, |
| |
October 1, |
|
|
|
2011 |
| |
2010 |
|
Short-term debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.00% convertible
subordinated notes
due March 2026, net
of debt discount of $240
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.25% senior secured notes due
March 2015, net of premium
(discount) of $19,249 and $(1,457)
|
|
$ |
194,249 |
|
|
$ |
173,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.25% senior secured notes due 2015 In March 2010, the Company issued $175.0 million aggregate
principal amount of senior secured notes due 2015 (senior notes) that mature on March 15, 2015.
The senior notes were sold at 99.06% of the principal amount, resulting in gross proceeds of
approximately $173.4 million. Deferred debt offering expenses were approximately $4.9 million. The
unamortized balance of $3.8 million was eliminated as of the Merger date. The senior notes have
not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and may not be sold in the
United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration requirements. The
senior notes accrue interest at a rate of 11.25% per annum payable semiannually on March 15 and
September 15 of each year, commencing on September 15, 2010. The obligations under the senior
notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior secured basis,
by all of the Companys domestic subsidiaries (except for Conexant CF, LLC, the Companys
receivables financing subsidiary). In addition, the senior notes and the note guarantees are
secured by liens on substantially all of the Companys and the guarantors tangible and intangible
property, subject to certain exceptions and permitted liens. On or after March 15, 2013, the
Company may redeem all or a part of the senior notes at a price of 105.625% of the principal
amount of the senior notes during the remainder of 2013 and 100.00% of the principal amount of the
senior notes thereafter, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the applicable redemption
date. In addition, at any time prior to March 15, 2013, the Company may, on one or more occasions,
redeem all or a part of the senior notes at any time at a redemption price equal to 100% of the
principal amount of the senior notes redeemed, plus a make-whole premium, plus accrued and
unpaid interest, if any, to the applicable redemption date. On or after January 1, 2011 until
March 15, 2013, the Company may also redeem up to 35% of the original aggregate principal amount
of the
15
senior notes, using the proceeds of certain qualified equity offerings, at a redemption
price of 111.25% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the
applicable redemption date. In addition, certain asset dispositions will be triggering events that
may require the Company to use the proceeds from those sales to make an offer to repurchase the
senior notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the senior notes
repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the applicable repurchase date if such
proceeds are not otherwise invested in the Companys business within a specific period of time.
The senior notes and the note guarantees rank senior to all of the Companys and the guarantors
existing and future subordinated indebtedness, including the convertible notes, but they are
structurally subordinated to all existing and future indebtedness and other liabilities (including
non-trade payables) of the Companys non-guarantor subsidiaries.
If a change of control occurs, the Company must offer to repurchase the senior notes at a
repurchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount of the senior notes repurchased, plus
accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the applicable repurchase date. In connection with the
Merger, the Company commenced a change of control offer (the Offer) on May 27, 2011 to purchase
any and all of its senior notes. The Company currently has outstanding $175.0 million in principal
amount of the senior notes. If all holders of the senior notes accepted the Offer, the Company
would have been obligated to repurchase the senior notes for an aggregate of $176.75 million plus
accrued and unpaid interest. The Offer expired on June 29, 2011 and was not extended by
the Company. No senior notes were tendered by their holders under the offer.
At the date of the Merger, the senior notes were valued at 111.50% of par or $195.1 million
resulting in a premium of $20.1 million. Amortization of the premium in the period from April 20,
2011 through July 1, 2011 was $0.9 million.
4.00% convertible subordinated notes due March 2026 In March 2006, the Company issued $200.0
million principal amount of convertible notes and, in May 2006, the initial purchaser of the
convertible notes exercised its option to purchase an additional $50.0 million principal amount of
the convertible notes. Total proceeds to the Company from these issuances, net of issuance costs,
were $243.6 million. The convertible notes were general unsecured obligations of the Company.
Interest on the convertible notes was payable in arrears semiannually on each March 1 and
September 1, beginning on September 1, 2006. The convertible notes were convertible, at the option
of the holder upon satisfaction of certain conditions, into shares of the Companys common stock
at a conversion price of $49.20 per share, subject to adjustment for certain events. Upon
conversion, the Company had the right to deliver, in lieu of common stock, cash or a combination
of cash and common stock. Beginning on March 1, 2011, the convertible notes could be redeemed at
the Companys option at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus any accrued and unpaid
interest. Holders could require the Company to repurchase, for cash, all or part of their
convertible notes on March 1, 2011, March 1, 2016 and March 1, 2021 at a price of 100% of the
principal amount, plus any accrued and unpaid interest. The Company redeemed the remaining $l1.2
million of convertible notes on March 1, 2011.
Accounts Receivable Financing Facility Effective on the date of the Merger, the Companys credit
facility with a bank was terminated. No amounts were due under the facility at the termination
date.
6. Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Matters
Litigation Relating to the Previously Contemplated Merger with SMSC
Between January 10, 2011 and February 11, 2011, the Company, the members of the Companys board of
directors and, in certain of the lawsuits, the Companys
President and Chief Executive Officer, its
former Chief Financial Officer, SMSC and/or Comet Acquisition Corp. were named as defendants in 12
purported class action lawsuits in connection with the transactions previously contemplated by the
SMSC Agreement filed by stockholders in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of
Orange, an additional five such lawsuits filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware and
one such lawsuit filed in the United States District Court, Central District of California. On
February 9, 2011, the first four Delaware actions were
consolidated under the caption In re
Conexant Systems, Inc. Shareholders Litigation, Consolidated C.A. No. 6136-VCP. On March 3, 2011, a
number of the California state plaintiffs filed a stipulation and proposed order to consolidate the
California actions and appoint interim co-lead class counsel. All of the actions have been
voluntarily dismissed. Seven of the California actions were dismissed with prejudice. The
remaining actions were voluntarily dismissed without prejudice.
Other Legal Matters
Certain claims have been asserted against the Company, including claims alleging the use of the
intellectual property rights of others in certain of the Companys products. The resolution of
these matters may entail the negotiation of a license agreement, a settlement, or the adjudication
of such claims through arbitration or litigation. At this time, it is not possible to assess the
outcome of the lawsuits and any losses are not reasonably estimable, therefore the Company cannot
assess the impact, if any, on the consolidated financial statements. Some of the lawsuits, claims
or proceedings may be disposed of unfavorably for the Company. Many intellectual property disputes
have a risk of injunctive relief and there can be no assurance that a license will be granted.
Injunctive relief could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of
operations of the Company. Based on its evaluation of matters that are pending or asserted management believes that the
disposition of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial
condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
16
Guarantees and Indemnifications
The Company has made guarantees and indemnities, under which it may be required to make payments to
a guaranteed or indemnified party, in relation to certain transactions. In connection with the
Companys spin-off from Rockwell International Corporation (Rockwell), the Company assumed
responsibility for all contingent liabilities and then-current and future litigation (including
environmental and intellectual property proceedings) against Rockwell or its subsidiaries in
respect of the operations of the semiconductor systems business of Rockwell. In connection with the
Companys contribution of certain of its manufacturing operations to Jazz Semiconductor, Inc. (now
TowerJazz), the Company agreed to indemnify TowerJazz for certain environmental matters and other
customary divestiture-related matters. In connection with the Companys sale of the Broadband Media
Processing (BMP) business to NXP, B.V., the Company agreed to indemnify NXP for certain claims
related to the transaction. In connection with the Companys sale of the Broadband Access (BBA)
business to Ikanos, the Company agreed to indemnify Ikanos for certain claims related to the
transaction. In connection with the sales of its products, the Company provides intellectual
property indemnities to its customers. In connection with certain facility leases, the Company has
indemnified its lessors for certain claims arising from the facility or the lease. The Company
indemnifies its directors and officers to the maximum extent permitted under the laws of the State
of Delaware.
The Company also has employment agreements and retention agreements with certain key employees.
A number of these agreements require severance payments, continuation of certain insurance benefits and participation in future benefit plans.
The durations of the Companys guarantees and indemnities vary, and in many cases are indefinite.
The guarantees and indemnities to customers in connection with product sales generally are subject
to limits based upon the amount of the related product sales. The majority of other guarantees and
indemnities do not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential future payments the Company
could be obligated to make. The Company has not recorded any liability for these guarantees and
indemnities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as they are not estimated to be
material. Product warranty costs and the Companys accrual for such costs are not significant.
7. Stock-Based Award Plans
All of the Companys stock-based award plans were cancelled at the consummation of the Merger. All
stock options and RSUs outstanding at the time of the merger were cancelled. Stock options to
acquire Companys Common Stock that were outstanding and unexercised immediately prior to the
Effective Time were cancelled and converted into the right to receive, with respect to each such
option, an amount of cash equal to the excess, if any, of the Gold Merger Consideration over the
exercise price per share under the option for each share subject to such option. Any option with an
exercise price greater than or equal to the Gold Merger Consideration was cancelled without
consideration. Each RSU that, as of immediately prior to the Effective Time, was outstanding and
either held by a non-employee director of the Company, or held by a management-level employee of
the Company at the rank of senior vice president or above was cancelled and converted into the
right to receive an amount of cash equal to the Gold Merger Consideration. All remaining RSUs were
cancelled with the holders of such RSUs being entitled to receive with respect to each RSU on the
date that the RSU would have otherwise vested had the Effective Time not occurred an amount of cash
equal to the Gold Merger Consideration (replacement award); provided that such payment will only
be required if (a) the employee continues to be employed continuously by the surviving corporation
through and including the original vesting date of such RSUs and (b) the employee has not otherwise
been issued or granted any incentive compensation following the Effective Time (but prior to such
original vesting date) that the surviving corporations board of directors has determined in good
faith in its sole discretion to be an appropriate replacement for such RSUs.
Change in control payments made upon consummation of the Merger totaled $6.4 million representing
2,674,000 RSUs and options to purchase 11,400 shares. These payments are included in the Merger
consideration. The Company recorded a liability for replacement awards of $1.1 million as of July
1, 2011. As of July 1, 2011, unrecognized expense related to replacement awards is approximately
$0.7 million, of which $0.6 million will be recognized over
the next six fiscal months.
The following predecessor disclosures regarding stock-based awards are for the period October 2,
2010 through April 19, 2011.
The Company maintained the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, which was approved by stockholders in
February 2010, and under which the Company had reserved 12.0 million shares for issuance, the 2004
New Hire Equity Incentive Plan, under which it had reserved 1.6 million shares for issuance, and
the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP). All awards granted under these plans were service-based
awards. Awards issued under the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2004 New Hire Equity Incentive Plan
and the ESPP were settled in shares of common stock.
As of April 19, 2011, approximately 9.9 million shares of the Companys common stock were available
for grant under the stock option and long-term incentive plans
Stock Options
Prior to the Merger, stock options were granted with exercise prices of not less than the fair
market value at the grant date, generally vested over four years and expired eight or ten years
after the grant date. The Company settled stock option exercises with newly issued shares of common
stock. The expected stock price volatility rates were based on the historical volatility of the
Companys common stock. The risk free interest rates were based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in
effect at the time of grant for periods corresponding with the expected life of the option or
award. The average expected life represented the weighted average period of time that options or
awards granted were expected to be outstanding. No stock options were granted in the period from
April 2, 2011 through April 19, 2011.
17
A summary of stock option activity is as follows (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Outstanding, October 1, 2010 |
|
|
2,296 |
|
|
$ |
21.45 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
0.70 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(706 |
) |
|
|
21.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, April 19, 2011 |
|
|
1,589 |
|
|
|
21.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares vested and expected to vest, April 19, 2011 |
|
|
1,589 |
|
|
|
21.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, April 19, 2011 |
|
|
1,559 |
|
|
$ |
21.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the period from April 2, 2011 through April 19, 2011, and the period from October 2, 2010
through April 19, 2011, the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense for stock options
of $4,000 and $0.1 million, respectively, in its consolidated statements of operations. During the
fiscal quarter and nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010, the Company recognized stock-based
compensation expense for stock options of $0.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively, in its
consolidated statements of operations.
Effective at the Merger date, all of the stock options were cancelled. Holders of stock options
which had an exercise price less than the Gold Merger Consideration, either vested or unvested,
were paid in cash the excess of the of the Gold Merger Consideration over the exercise price.
Total cash paid was approximately $15,000 representing 11,400 vested stock options which was
included in the Merger consideration, and $15,000 representing 13,000 unvested stock options, which
was charged to expense.
Restricted Stock Units
The Companys long-term incentive plans provided for the issuance of share-based RSU awards to
officers and other employees and certain non-employees of the Company. These awards were subject to
forfeiture if employment terminated during the prescribed vesting period (generally within one to
three years of the date of award).
A summary of RSU award activity under the Companys long-term incentive plans is as follows (shares
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Grant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date Fair |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
Outstanding, October 1, 2010 |
|
|
4,773 |
|
|
$ |
2.69 |
|
Granted |
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
1.68 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(1,337 |
) |
|
|
2.81 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
2.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, April 19, 2011 |
|
|
3,603 |
|
|
$ |
2.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the period from April 2, 2011 through April 19, 2011, and the period from October 2,
2010 through April 19, 2011, the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $0.3
million and $3.9 million, respectively, related to RSU awards. During the fiscal quarter and nine
fiscal months ended July 2, 2010, the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $1.5
million and $3.6 million, respectively, related to RSU awards. The total fair value of RSU awards
vested in the period from April 2, 2011 through April 19, 2011, and the period from October 2, 2010
through April 19, 2011, was zero and $2.1 million, respectively.
Effective at the Merger date, all of the RSUs were cancelled. RSUs held by either non-employee
directors of the Company, or held by management-level employees of the Company at the rank of
senior vice president or above were converted into the right to receive an amount of cash equal to
the Gold Merger Consideration. Total cash paid was approximately $6.4 million representing
2,674,000 converted RSUs which was included in the Merger consideration.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The Companys ESPP allowed eligible employees to purchase shares of the Companys common stock at
nine-month intervals during an offering period at 85% of the lower of the fair market value on the
first day of the offering period or the purchase date. Under the ESPP, employees could
18
authorize
the Company to withhold up to 15% of their compensation for each pay period, up to a maximum annual
amount of $25,000, to purchase shares under the plan, subject to certain limitations, and employees
were limited to the purchase of 600 shares per offering period. Offering periods generally
commenced on the first trading day of February and August of each year and were generally nine
months in duration, but could be terminated earlier under certain circumstances. The ESPP was
suspended effective January 1, 2011. The final purchase under the ESPP was for the offering period
ending on January 31, 2011, under which 53,000 shares were purchased by employees. During the
period from October 2, 2010 through April 19, 2011 the Company recognized stock-based compensation
expense for the ESPP of $33,000 in its consolidated statements of operations.
During the fiscal quarter and nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010, the Company recognized
stock-based compensation expense for the ESPP of $0.1 million in its consolidated statements of
operations.
8. Income Taxes
The Company recorded a tax provision of $0.2 million for the period from April 20, 2011 through
July 1, 2011, a tax benefit of $30,000 for the period from April 2, 2011 through April 19, 2011,
and a tax provision of $0.4 million for the period October 2, 2010 through April 19, 2011,
primarily reflecting income taxes imposed on the Companys foreign subsidiaries. The Company
recorded a tax provision of $0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively, for the fiscal quarter and
nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010, primarily reflecting income taxes imposed on the Companys
foreign subsidiaries. All of the Companys U.S. federal income taxes and the majority of the
Companys state income taxes are offset by fully reserved deferred tax assets.
The acquisition of the Companys Common Stock in connection with the Merger triggered an ownership
change under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (Section 382). Section 382 imposes
an annual limitation (based upon the value at the time of the ownership change, as determined under
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code) on the amount of taxable income that can be offset with
net operating loss (NOL) carryovers that existed at time of the acquisition. Section 383 will
also limit the Companys ability to use R&D tax credit carryovers. In addition, as the tax basis of
the Companys assets exceeded the fair market value of its assets at the time of the ownership
change, Section 382 will also limit the Companys ability to use amortization of capitalized R&D
and goodwill to offset taxable income for the first five years following an ownership change. Any
unused annual limitation may be carried over to later years until the applicable expiration date for the respective NOLs. Similar limitations have been implemented by states and certain
foreign jurisdictions. The Company is currently assessing the impact of Section 382 on its fully
reserved deferred tax assets. The Company expects the change of ownership to significantly limit
its ability to utilize its federal and state deferred tax assets and expects to impair the carrying
value of its deferred tax assets and change the amount of the Companys unrecognized tax benefits. As the federal and state deferred tax assets are fully reserved,
the Company does not expect this impairment to have an impact on its current year financial
position or results of operations. However, the limitation on the use of the Companys NOLs,
credits and amortization which resulted from the ownership changes could adversely impact its
future operating results and financial condition.
In addition, the Company can within nine and a half months of the Merger elect under Section 338 of
the Internal Revenue Code to treat the Merger as if it were an asset purchase for federal income
tax purposes. If the Company makes a Section 338 election, generally the Companys tax basis of
its assets will equal the fair market value at the time of the Merger, the intangible assets would
be deductible over 15 years under IRC Section 197 and the net operating losses, federal credits and
remaining deferred taxes would be eliminated. The Companys financial position and results of
operations and cash flows could materially change if the Company makes a Section 338 election.
9. Gain on Sale of Intellectual Property
On October 22, 2010, the Company sold certain internally developed Conexant RF Patents and MPEG
Patents to Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (Skyworks) and terminated its exclusive rights in Skyworks RF
Patents obtained pursuant to an agreement entered into between the Company and Skyworks in 2003, in
exchange for non-exclusive licenses to each of the Conexant RF Patents, MPEG Patents and Skyworks
RF Patents and $1.25 million in cash. The Company received $0.6 million of the sale price in
November 2010 and the remainder in March 2011. The entire amount of $1.25 million was recognized as
a gain as the patents had a net book value of zero.
10. Special Charges
Special charges consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
Period from |
|
|
|
Period from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from |
|
|
|
Period from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 20, 2011 |
|
|
|
April 2, 2011 |
|
|
Fiscal Quarter |
|
|
April 20, 2011 |
|
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
Nine Fiscal |
|
|
|
through |
|
|
|
through |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
through |
|
|
|
2010 through |
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
April 19, 2011 |
|
|
July 2, 2010 |
|
|
July 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
April 19, 2011 |
|
|
July 2, 2010 |
|
Severance charges |
|
$ |
8,368 |
|
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,368 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,873 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Merger transaction charges |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
|
5,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
|
16,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lease impairment charges |
|
|
2,106 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
2,106 |
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
1,712 |
|
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
1,712 |
|
|
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
760 |
|
Other special charges |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,580 |
|
|
|
$ |
5,660 |
|
|
$ |
723 |
|
|
$ |
12,580 |
|
|
|
$ |
20,890 |
|
|
$ |
859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
For the period from April 20, 2011 through July 1, 2011, special charges consisted primarily
of $8.4 million of severance charges resulting from reduction in headcount after the Merger, $2.1
million of lease impairment charges resulting from under-utilized space after the Merger under
which we have continuing lease obligations, $1.7 million for restructuring charges resulting
primarily from changes in projected sub-lease income on restructured leases and $0.4 million
transaction charges. For the period from April 2, 2011 through April 19, 2011, special charges
consisted primarily of $5.3 million of transaction charges and $0.3 million restructuring charges
from accretion of lease liability related to restructured facilities. For the period from October
2, 2010 through April 19, 2011, special charges consisted primarily of $16.9 million for
transaction charges, including payment of a $7.7 million fee for termination of the SMSC Agreement
and $9.2 million of financial advisory, legal and other fees related to the terminated merger with
SMSC and the Merger, $2.9 million for one-time severance benefits associated with reductions in
headcount primarily in the first fiscal quarter of 2011, and $0.9 million of restructuring charges
from accretion of lease liability related to restructured facilities.
For the fiscal quarter and nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010, special charges consisted
primarily of restructuring and lease impairment charges primarily related to accretion of lease
liability related to restructured facilities and impaired leases.
Restructuring Charges
The Company has implemented a number of cost reduction initiatives to improve its operating cost
structure. The cost reduction initiatives included workforce reductions and the closure or
consolidation of certain facilities, among other actions.
Restructuring Accruals As of July 1, 2011, the Company has remaining restructuring accruals of
$31.9 million, which primarily relate to facilities. Of the $31.9 million of restructuring accruals
at July 1, 2011, $4.3 million is included in other current liabilities and $27.6 million is
included in other non-current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The
Company expects to pay the obligations for the non-cancelable lease and other commitments over
their respective terms, which expire at various dates through fiscal 2021. The Companys accrued
liabilities include the net present value of the future lease obligations of $49.7 million, net of
contracted sublease income of $12.7 million, and projected sublease income of $5.1 million. The
facility charges were determined in accordance with the accounting guidance for costs associated
with exit or disposal activities. As a result, the Company recorded the net present value of the
future lease obligations and will accrete the remaining amounts into expense over the remaining
terms of the non-cancellable leases.
Fiscal 2009 Restructuring Actions As part of a workforce reduction implemented during the fiscal
year ended October 2, 2009, the Company completed actions that resulted in the elimination of 183
positions worldwide.
Activity and liability balances recorded as part of the fiscal 2009 restructuring actions through
April 19, 2011 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce Reductions |
|
|
|
Fiscal Period Ended |
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
April 19, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Reserve at beginning of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
1,582 |
|
Charged to costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
26 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(1,555 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve at end of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There was no activity in the period April 20, 2011 through July 1, 2011 related to the fiscal
2009 restructuring action.
Fiscal 2008 Restructuring Actions During fiscal 2008, the Company announced its decision to
discontinue investments in standalone wireless networking solutions and other product areas.
Charges to expense in the period from April 20, 2011 through July 1, 2011 and October 2, 2010 to
April 19, 2011 relate to accretion of lease liability on restructured facilities under
non-cancelable leases.
20
Activity and liability balances recorded as part of the Fiscal 2008 restructuring actions through
July 1, 2011 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility and Other |
|
|
|
Fiscal Period Ended |
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
|
April 19, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Reserve at beginning of period |
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
Charged to costs and expenses |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve at end of period |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2007 Restructuring Actions During fiscal 2007, the Company announced several
facility closures and workforce reductions. In total, the Company notified approximately 670
employees of their involuntary termination. Charges to expense in the period from April 20, 2011
through July 1, 2011 consist of $1.3 million expense due to lower projected sub-tenant rent income
and $0.4 million accretion of lease liability on restructured facilities under non-cancelable
leases, of which $1.7 million was included in discontinued operations related to the Companys
discontinued BMP business. Charges to expense in the period October 2, 2010 to April 19, 2011
consists of $0.2 million of expense due to lower projected sub-tenant rent income and $1.1 million
accretion of lease liability on restructured facilities under non-cancelable leases, of which $0.8
million was included in discontinued operations related to the Companys discontinued BMP business.
Activity and liability balances recorded as part of the Fiscal 2007 restructuring actions through
July 1, 2011 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility and Other |
|
|
|
Fiscal Period Ended |
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
|
April 19, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Reserve at beginning of period |
|
$ |
19,617 |
|
|
|
$ |
22,845 |
|
|
$ |
27,233 |
|
Charged to costs and expenses |
|
|
1,718 |
|
|
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
|
2,211 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(683 |
) |
|
|
|
(4,510 |
) |
|
|
(6,599 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve at end of period |
|
$ |
20,652 |
|
|
|
$ |
19,617 |
|
|
$ |
22,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006 and 2005 Restructuring Actions During fiscal years 2006 and 2005, the Company
announced operating site closures and workforce reductions. In total, the Company notified
approximately 385 employees of their involuntary termination. Charges to expense in the period from
April 20, 2011 through July 1, 2011 consist of $1.4 million expense due to lower projected
sub-tenant rent income and $0.2 million accretion of lease liability on restructured facilities
under non-cancelable leases. Charges to expense in the period October 2, 2010 to April 19, 2011
relate to accretion of lease liability on restructured facilities under non-cancelable leases.
Activity and liability balances recorded as part of the Fiscal 2006 and 2005 restructuring actions
through July 1, 2011 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility and Other |
|
|
|
Fiscal Period Ended |
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
|
April 19, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Reserve at beginning of period |
|
$ |
10,070 |
|
|
|
$ |
10,849 |
|
|
$ |
13,851 |
|
Charged to costs and expenses |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
(936 |
) |
Cash payments |
|
|
(457 |
) |
|
|
|
(1,294 |
) |
|
|
(2,066 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve at end of period |
|
$ |
11,213 |
|
|
|
$ |
10,070 |
|
|
$ |
10,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
11. Other Expense (Income), net
Other expense (income), net consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
Successor |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
Period from |
|
|
Period from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from |
|
|
Period from |
|
|
Nine Fiscal |
|
|
|
April 20, 2011 |
|
|
April 2, 2011 |
|
|
Fiscal Quarter |
|
|
April 20, 2011 |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
Months |
|
|
|
through |
|
|
through |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
through |
|
|
2010 through |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
July 1, 2011 |
|
|
April 19, 2011 |
|
|
July 2, 2010 |
|
|
July 1, 2011 |
|
|
April 19, 2011 |
|
|
July 2, 2010 |
|
Investment and interest income |
|
$ |
(42 |
) |
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
$ |
(137 |
) |
|
$ |
(42 |
) |
|
$ |
(159 |
) |
|
$ |
(257 |
) |
Gain on sale of investments |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,177 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(1,393 |
) |
|
|
(12,911 |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,581 |
|
Decrease (increase) in the fair value of derivative instruments |
|
|
3,757 |
|
|
|
3,690 |
|
|
|
6,848 |
|
|
|
3,757 |
|
|
|
9,469 |
|
|
|
(11,353 |
) |
Other |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense (income), net |
|
$ |
3,812 |
|
|
$ |
3,778 |
|
|
$ |
9,248 |
|
|
$ |
3,812 |
|
|
$ |
8,423 |
|
|
$ |
(5,711 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense, net of $3.8 million during the period from April 20, 2011 through July 1, 2011 and
the period from April 2, 2011 through April 19, 2011, respectively, primarily consisted of a $3.8
million decrease in the fair value of the Companys warrant to purchase 6.1 million shares of
Mindspeed common stock. Other expense, net of $8.4 million, net during the period from October 2,
2010 through April 19, 2011 primarily consisted of a $9.5 million decrease in the Mindspeed warrant
partially offset by a $1.4 million gain on sale of equity investments. Of the $1.4 million gain on
sale of equity investments, the Company has received proceeds in the amount of $0.8 million. The
difference between the gain and proceeds has been recorded as a receivable.
Other expense, net of $9.2 million, net during the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010 primarily
consisted of a loss of $8.0 million on extinguishment of convertible debt, which consists of $5.8
million of unamortized debt discount and a $2.1 million premium over par paid upon repurchase, and
a $6.9 million decrease in the fair value of our warrant to purchase 6.1 million shares of
Mindspeed common stock, partially offset by a $5.2 million gain on sale of equity investments and
$0.4 million of investment and interest income on invested cash balances and other gains. Other
(income), net of $5.7 million, net during the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010 primarily
consisted of a $12.9 million gain on sale of equity investments and an $11.4 million increase in
the fair value of our warrant to purchase 6.1 million shares of Mindspeed common stock, partially
offset by a loss of $18.6 million on extinguishment of debt, which consists of $13.4 million of
unamortized debt discount, $1.8 million premium over par paid upon repurchase and $3.4 million of
transaction costs.
12. Related Party Transactions
In the period October 2, 2010 through April 19, 2011, one member of the Companys Board of
Directors also served on the Board of Mindspeed. At the consummation of the Merger all of the
Companys board members resigned. As of July 1, 2011, April 19 and October 1, 2010, the Company
held a warrant to purchase 6.1 million shares of Mindspeed common stock at an exercise price of
$16.74 per share exercisable through June 2013. No amounts were due to or receivable from Mindspeed
at April 19, 2011 or at October 1, 2010.
Effective
upon completion of the Merger, the Company became affiliated with the
companies affiliated with Golden Gate Capital and August Capital. The Company has not entered into
any material transactions with these affiliates.
13. Geographic Information
Net revenues by geographic area, based upon country of destination, were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
Successor |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
Period from |
|
|
Period from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from |
|
|
Period from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 20, 2011 |
|
|
April 2, 2011 |
|
|
Fiscal Quarter |
|
|
April 20, 2011 |
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
Nine Fiscal |
|
|
|
through |
|
|
through |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
through |
|
|
through |
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 1, 2011 |
|
|
April 19, 2011 |
|
|
July 2, 2010 |
|
|
July 1, 2011 |
|
|
April 19, 2011 |
|
|
July 2, 2010 |
|
United States |
|
$ |
696 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
5,458 |
|
|
$ |
696 |
|
|
$ |
5,239 |
|
|
$ |
11,299 |
|
Other Americas |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1,033 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
3,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Americas |
|
|
922 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
6,491 |
|
|
|
922 |
|
|
|
5,949 |
|
|
|
14,717 |
|
China |
|
|
23,995 |
|
|
|
3,056 |
|
|
|
37,326 |
|
|
|
23,995 |
|
|
|
54,236 |
|
|
|
108,537 |
|
Taiwan |
|
|
3,957 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
5,404 |
|
|
|
3,957 |
|
|
|
9,766 |
|
|
|
17,997 |
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
7,755 |
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
10,845 |
|
|
|
7,755 |
|
|
|
22,335 |
|
|
|
40,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Asia-Pacific |
|
|
35,707 |
|
|
|
3,767 |
|
|
|
53,575 |
|
|
|
35,707 |
|
|
|
86,337 |
|
|
|
167,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa |
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
2,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
37,009 |
|
|
$ |
3,872 |
|
|
$ |
60,730 |
|
|
$ |
37,009 |
|
|
$ |
93,111 |
|
|
$ |
184,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
The Company believes that a portion of the products sold to original equipment manufacturers
(OEMs) and third-party manufacturing service providers in the Asia-Pacific region is ultimately
shipped to end-markets in the Americas and Europe. One distributor accounted for 17% of net
revenues for the period from April 20, 2011 through July 1, 2011 and 22% and 14% for the period
from April 2, 2011 through April 19, 2011 and the period from October 2, 2010 through April 19,
2011, respectively. One distributor accounted for 15% and 14% of net sales for the fiscal quarter
and nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010, respectively. Sales to the Companys twenty largest
customers represented approximately 95% of total revenues for the period from April 20, 2011
through July 1, 2011 and 95% and 89% of total revenues for the period from April 2, 2011 through
April 19, 2011 and the period from October 2, 2010 through April 19, 2011, respectively. Sales to
the Companys twenty largest customers represented 84% and 82% of total revenues for the fiscal
quarter and nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010, respectively.
Long-lived assets consist of property, plant and equipment and certain other long-term assets.
Long-lived assets by geographic area were as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
United States |
|
$ |
23,067 |
|
|
$ |
24,389 |
|
India |
|
|
1,611 |
|
|
|
1,022 |
|
China |
|
|
2,232 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
1,092 |
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
27,953 |
|
|
$ |
27,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following have been excluded from the geographic presentation of long-lived assets above as of
July 1, 2011 and October 1, 2010, respectively: Goodwill totaling $222.7 million and $109.9
million, respectively; Intangible assets totaling $113.8 million and $4.3 million,
respectively and the Mindspeed warrant totaling $7.5 million and $20.7 million, respectively. These
items are located in the United States and disclosed separately.
14. Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated subsequent events to assess the need for potential recognition or
disclosure in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Such events were evaluated until the date these
financial statements were issued. Based upon this evaluation, it was determined that no subsequent
events occurred that require disclosure in the financial statements.
23
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated
financial statements and the notes thereto included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q, as well as other cautionary statements and risks described elsewhere in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q, and our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2010.
Overview
We design, develop and sell semiconductor system solutions, comprised of semiconductor devices,
software and reference designs, for imaging, audio, embedded-modem, and video applications. These
solutions include a comprehensive portfolio of imaging solutions for multifunction printers (MFPs),
fax platforms, and interactive display frame market segments. Our audio solutions include
high-definition (HD) audio integrated circuits, HD audio codecs, and speakers-on-a-chip solutions
for personal computers, PC peripheral sound systems, audio subsystems, speakers, notebook docking
stations, voice-over-IP speakerphones, USB headsets supporting Microsoft Office Communicator and
Skype, and audio-enabled surveillance applications. We also offer a full suite of embedded-modem
solutions for set-top boxes, point-of-sale systems, home automation and security systems, and
desktop and notebook PCs. Additional products include decoders and media bridges for video
surveillance security and monitoring applications, and system solutions for analog video-based
multimedia applications.
We have prepared our discussion of the results of operations for the fiscal quarter ended July 1,
2011 by adding the earnings and cash flows of the Successor period from April 20, 2011 through July
1, 2011 and the Predecessor period from April 2, 2011 through April 19, 2011, as compared to the
Predecessor fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010. Similarly, we have prepared our discussion of the
results of operations for the nine fiscal months ended July 1, 2011 by adding the earnings and cash
flows of the Successor period from April 20, 2011 through July 1, 2011 and the Predecessor period
from October 2, 2010 through April 19, 2011, as compared to the Predecessor nine fiscal months
ended July 2, 2010. The operating results have not been prepared on a pro forma basis under
applicable regulations and may not reflect the actual results we would have achieved absent the
Merger, defined below, and may not be predictive of future results of operations.
Merger with Conexant Holdings, Inc.
On April 19, 2011, we completed a merger with Gold Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation,
(Merger Sub) and a wholly owned subsidiary of Gold Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation,
subsequently renamed Conexant Holdings, Inc. (Conexant Holdings). Pursuant to the Agreement and
Plan of Merger dated as of February 20, 2011, by and among the Company, Gold Holdings, Inc. and
Merger Sub (the Merger Agreement), Merger Sub was merged with and into the Company, with the
Company surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of Conexant Holdings (the Merger). In connection
with the Merger, shares of our common stock ceased to be traded on
the NASDAQ Stock Market after close
of market on April 19, 2011.
The aggregate consideration for all equity securities including cancelled and converted stock
options and RSUs of the Company was $203.8 million. An additional $0.1 million consideration was
paid to satisfy an existing bank line of credit outstanding on the Merger date. The Merger was
funded with the proceeds of equity contributions from Golden Gate Capital and affiliated entities in
the amount of $203.9 million.
Termination of Merger Agreement with Standard Microsystems Corporation
On February 23, 2011, we terminated our previously announced Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated
January 9, 2011 (the SMSC Agreement), with Standard Microsystems Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (SMSC), and Comet Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned
subsidiary of SMSC. Pursuant to the terms of the SMSC Agreement, we paid a termination fee of $7.7
million to SMSC.
Sale of Real Property
On December 22, 2010, we sold certain real property adjacent to our Newport Beach, California
headquarters to Uptown Newport L.P. for $23.5 million, which consisted of $21.5 million in cash and
a limited partnership interest in the property, which we have valued at $2.0 million. The property
primarily consists of approximately 25 acres of land, and included two leased buildings,
improvements and site development costs. The net book value of the property sold was as follows (in
thousands):
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Land |
|
$ |
1,662 |
|
Land and leasehold improvements, net |
|
|
356 |
|
Buildings, net |
|
|
5,610 |
|
Machinery and equipment, net |
|
|
262 |
|
Site development costs |
|
|
7,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
We have continuing involvement with the property related to groundwater and soil remediation, and
therefore at the time of the sale deferred the gain of $6.9 million on the monetary portion of the
proceeds of the transaction, net of transaction costs of $0.4 million. The deferred gain was
eliminated in the Merger purchase price allocation. Responsibility for soil remediation was
transferred to Uptown Newport L.P., but we retained certain obligations to assist in the soil
remediation process for up to five years (or earlier under certain circumstances set forth in the
agreement between the parties). Responsibility for groundwater remediation remains with us in
perpetuity, however, upon receipt of a No Further Action letter (NFA Letter) from the appropriate
government regulator indicating that the remediation is substantially complete is an indication
that the risk of discovery of additional groundwater contamination is remote. We have accrued $2.0
million of reserves based on managements best estimate of remaining remediation costs, of which
$1.0 million is classified in long-term other liabilities.
We retained an approximately 7.5% limited partnership interest in the property that is recognized
at an estimated fair value of $2.0 million. The limited partnership interest holds a limited
partnership interest in Uptown Newport L.P. which will own, operate and develop the real the
property sold by us in December 2010. We have the option to sell our partnership interest to the
developer at $2.0 million plus a 12% return, if Uptown Newport L.P obtains certain financing. The
$2.0 million fair market value is derived in large part based on our expectation that we will be
able to exercise our put option to sell our interest in the partnership within the next 12 months.
Critical Accounting Policies
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP, which require
us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Information
with respect to our critical accounting policies that we believe have the most significant effect
on our reported results and require subjective or complex judgments of management is contained on
pages 27 31 of the Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2010. Other than
estimates related to fair-value measurements applied to tangible and intangible assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in connection with the Merger, as discussed further in Note 2 in the Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1
of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, management believes that at July 1, 2011
there has been no material change to this information.
Results of Operations
Net Revenues
Net revenues consist of product sales, which we generally recognize upon shipment, less an estimate
for returns and allowances. We sell our products to distributors, contract manufacturers (ODMs) and
end-customers (OEMs), whose products include our products. End customers may purchase directly from
us or from distributors or contract manufacturers.
Our net
revenues decreased 33% to $40.9 million in the successor period from April 20, 2011 through
July 1, 2011 and the predecessor period from April 2, 2011 through April 19, 2011 from $60.7
million in the predecessor fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010. The decrease in net revenues was
driven by a 20% decrease in unit volume shipments and a 16% decrease in average selling prices
(ASPs), primarily as a result of overall weakness in the semiconductor industry.
Our net
revenues decreased 29% to $130.1 million in the successor period from April 20, 2011
through July 1, 2011 and the predecessor period from October 2, 2010 through April 19, 2011 from
$184.4 million in the predecessor nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010. The decrease in net
revenues was driven by a 25% decrease in unit volume shipments and a
6% decrease in ASPs, primarily as a result of overall weakness in the semiconductor industry.
We remain focused on capturing higher market share for our existing products and delivering new and
innovative solutions for imaging, audio, and video applications.
Gross Margin
Gross margin represents net revenues less cost of goods sold. As a fabless semiconductor company,
we use third parties for wafer production and assembly and test services. Our cost of goods sold
consists predominantly of purchased finished wafers, assembly and test services, royalties,
25
other intellectual property costs, labor and overhead associated with product procurement and non-cash
stock-based compensation charges for procurement personnel.
Our gross margin percentage for the successor period from April 20, 2011 through July 1, 2011 and
the predecessor period from April 2, 2011 through April 19, 2011 was 13% compared with 61% for the
predecessor fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010. The decrease in gross margin percentage is primarily
attributable to $16.3 million sell off of fair value applied to inventory as part of the purchase
price allocated in connection with the Merger. Excluding the inventory purchase price fair value,
our gross margin percentage for the successor period from April 20, 2011 through July 1, 2011 and
the predecessor period from April 2, 2011 through April 19,
2011 was 57%. The 4% decrease in gross margin percentage was due to price erosion and product mix.
Our gross margin percentage for the successor period from April 20, 2011 through July 1, 2011 and
the predecessor period from October 2, 2010 through April 19, 2011 was 44% compared with 61% for
the predecessor nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010. The decrease in gross margin percentage is
primarily attributable to $16.3 million sell off of fair value applied to inventory as part of the
purchase price allocated in connection with the Merger. Excluding the inventory purchase price
fair value, our gross margin percentage for the successor period from April 20, 2011 through July
1, 2011 and the predecessor period from October 2, 2010 through April 19, 2011 was 58%.The 3%
decrease in gross margin percentage was due to price erosion and product mix.
Research and Development
Our research and development (R&D) expenses consist principally of direct personnel costs to
develop new semiconductor solutions, allocated indirect costs of the R&D function, photo mask and
other costs for pre-production evaluation and testing of new devices, and design and test tool
costs. Our R&D expenses also include the costs for design automation advanced package development
and non-cash stock-based compensation charges for R&D personnel.
R&D expense did not change materially in the successor period from April 20, 2011 through July 1,
2011 and the predecessor period from April 2, 2011 through April 19, 2011 compared to the
predecessor fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010. Increases in headcount and salary expense were
offset by lower employee incentive accruals.
R&D expense increased $0.7 million, or 2%, in the successor period from April 20, 2011 through July
1, 2011 and the predecessor period from October 2, 2010 through April 19, 2011 compared to the
predecessor nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010. The increase is due to higher employee headcount
and salary expense, higher project expenses, and higher allocated facility costs, offset by lower
employee incentive accruals.
Selling, General and Administrative
Our selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses include personnel costs, sales
representative commissions, advertising and other marketing costs. Our SG&A expenses also include
costs of corporate functions including legal, accounting, treasury, human resources, customer
service, sales, marketing, field application engineering, allocated indirect costs of the SG&A
function, and non-cash stock-based compensation charges for SG&A personnel.
SG&A expense decreased $2.2 million, or 18%, in the successor period from April 20, 2011 through
July 1, 2011 and the predecessor period from April 2, 2011 through April 19, 2011 compared to the
predecessor fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010. The decrease is primarily due to lower employee
headcount and incentive accruals and lower professional fees, offset by an increase in legal
expenses.
SG&A expense decreased $4.9 million, or 13%, in the successor period from April 20, 2011 through
July 1, 2011 and the predecessor period from October 2, 2010 through April 19, 2011 compared to the
predecessor nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010. The decrease is primarily due to lower headcount
and incentive accruals and lower professional fees, offset by an increase in legal expenses.
Amortization of Intangible Assets
Intangible
assets subject to amortization of $57.5 million were recorded in
connection with the
Merger, and are being amortized over a weighted-average remaining period of approximately 6.7
years. As a result, amortization expense increased to $4.9 million in the successor period from
April 20, 2011 through July 1, 2011 and the predecessor period from April 2, 2011 through April 19,
2011 and $5.4 million in the successor period from April 20, 2011 through July 1, 2011 and the
predecessor period from October 2, 2010 through April 19, 2011, respectively, compared to $0.3
million and $1.0 million in the predecessor fiscal quarter and nine fiscal months ended July 2,
2010, respectively.
Sale of Intellectual Property
On October 22, 2010, we sold certain internally developed Conexant RF Patents and MPEG Patents to
Skyworks and terminated our exclusive rights in Skyworks RF Patents obtained pursuant to an
agreement we entered into with Skyworks in 2003, in exchange for non-exclusive licenses
26
to each of
the Conexant RF Patents, MPEG Patents and Skyworks RF Patents and $1.25 million in cash. We
received $0.6 million of the sale price in November 2010 and the remainder in March 2011. The
entire $1.25 million was recognized as gain as the patents had no book value.
Special Charges
For the successor period from April 20, 2011 through July 1, 2011 and the predecessor period from
April 2, 2011 through April 19, 2011, special charges consisted primarily of $8.5 million of
severance charges resulting from reduction in headcount after the Merger, $5.6 million of
transaction charges, $2.1 million of lease impairment charges resulting from under-utilized space
after the Merger under which we have continuing lease obligations and $2.0 million for
restructuring charges resulting primarily from changes in projected sub-lease income on
restructured leases. For the successor period from April 20, 2011 through July 1, 2011 and the
predecessor period from October 2, 2010 through April 19, 2011, special charges consisted primarily
of $17.2 million for transaction charges, including payment of a $7.7 million fee for termination
of the SMSC Agreement and $9.5 million of financial advisory, legal and other fees related to the
terminated merger with SMSC and the Merger with Conexant Holdings, $11.2 million for one-time
severance benefits associated with reductions in headcount in the first fiscal quarter of 2011 and
following the Merger, $2.6 million of restructuring charges from changes in projected sub-lease
income and accretion of lease liability related to restructured facilities, and $2.2 million of
lease impairment charges resulting from under-utilized space after the Merger under which we have
continuing lease obligations.
For the predecessor fiscal quarter and nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010, special charges
consisted primarily of restructuring and lease impairment charges primarily related to accretion of
lease liability related to restructured facilities and impaired leases.
Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased $3.0 million to $4.2 million in the successor period from April 20, 2011
through July 1, 2011 and the predecessor period from April 2, 2011 through April 19, 2011 from $7.2
million in the predecessor fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010. The decrease is primarily
attributable to the extinguishment of debt in the predecessor nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010
and resulting reduction in interest and debt discount expense, offset by $0.9 million amortization
of the $20.1 million debt premium on the Companys 11.25% senior secured notes recorded at the
Merger date. Interest expense in the successor period from April 20, 2011 through July 1, 2011
includes $0.9 million debt premium amortization. Interest expense in the predecessor fiscal
quarter ended July 2, 2010 includes debt discount amortization of $0.7 million.
Interest expense decreased $9.0 million to $15.4 million in the successor period from April 20,
2011 through July 1, 2011 and the predecessor period from October 2, 2010 through April 19, 2011
from $24.4 million in the predecessor nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010. The decrease is
primarily attributable to the extinguishment of debt in the predecessor nine fiscal months ended
July 2, 2010 and resulting reduction in interest and debt discount expense, offset by $0.9 million
amortization of $20.1 million debt premium on the Companys 11.25% senior secured notes recorded at
the Merger date. Interest expense in the successor period from April 20, 2011 through July 1, 2011
includes $0.9 million debt premium amortization. Interest expense in the predecessor nine fiscal
months ended July 2, 2010 includes debt discount amortization of $7.7 million.
Other Expense (Income), net
Other expense, net of $7.6 million during the successor period from April 20, 2011 through July 1,
2011 and the predecessor period from April 2, 2011 through April 19, 2011 consisted primarily of a
$7.4 million decrease in the fair value of our warrant to purchase 6.1 million shares of Mindspeed
common stock. Other expense, net of $12.2 million during the successor period from April 20, 2011
through July 1, 2011 and the predecessor period from October 2, 2010 through April 19, 2011
consisted primarily of a $13.2 million decrease in the Mindspeed warrant partially offset by a $1.4
million gain on sale of equity investments. Of the $1.4 million gain on sale of equity investments,
we have received proceeds in the amount of $0.8 million. The difference between the gain and
proceeds has been recorded as a receivable.
Other expense, net of $9.2 million during the predecessor fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010
primarily consisted of a loss of $8.0 million on extinguishment of convertible debt, which consists
of $5.8 million of unamortized debt discount and a $2.1 million premium over par paid upon
repurchase, and a $6.9 million decrease in the fair value of our warrant to purchase 6.1 million
shares of Mindspeed common stock, partially offset by a $5.2 million gain on sale of equity
investments and $0.4 million of investment and interest income on invested cash balances and other
gains. Other (income), net of $5.7 million during the predecessor nine fiscal months ended July 2,
2010 primarily consisted of a $12.9 million gain on sale of equity investments and an $11.4 million
increase in the fair value of our warrant to purchase 6.1 million shares of Mindspeed common stock,
partially offset by a loss of $18.6 million on extinguishment of debt, which consists of $13.4
million of unamortized debt discount, $1.8 million premium over par paid upon repurchase and $3.4
million of transaction costs.
Provision for Income Taxes
We recorded a tax provision of $0.2 million in the successor period from April 20, 2011 through
July 1, 2011 and the predecessor period from April 2, 2011 through April 19, 2011 and $0.6 million
in the successor period from April 20, 2011 through July 1, 2011 and the predecessor period from
October 2, 2010 through April 19, 2011, primarily reflecting income taxes imposed on our foreign
subsidiaries. We recorded a tax provision of $0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively, for the
predecessor fiscal quarter and nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010, primarily reflecting
27
income taxes imposed on our foreign subsidiaries. All of our U.S. federal income taxes and the majority of
our state income taxes are offset by fully reserved deferred tax assets.
The acquisition of our common stock in connection with the Merger triggered an ownership change
under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (Section 382). Section 382 imposes an
annual limitation (based upon the value at the time of the ownership change, as determined under
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code) on the amount of taxable income that can be offset with
net operating loss (NOL) carryovers that existed at time of the acquisition. Section 383 will
also limit our ability to use R&D tax credit carryovers. In addition, as the tax basis of our
assets exceeded the fair market value of our assets at the time of the ownership change, Section
382 will also limit our ability to use amortization of capitalized R&D and goodwill to offset
taxable income for the first five years following an ownership change. Any unused annual limitation
may be carried over to later years until the applicable expiration date for the respective NOLs.
Similar limitations have been implemented by states and certain foreign jurisdictions. We are
currently assessing the impact of Section 382 on our fully reserved deferred tax assets. We expect
the change of ownership to significantly limit our ability to utilize our federal and state
deferred tax assets and expect to impair the carrying value of the deferred tax assets and change the amount of our unrecognized tax benefits. As the
federal and state deferred tax assets are fully reserved, we do not expect this impairment to have
an impact on our current year financial position or results of operations. However, the
limitation on the use of our NOLs, credits and amortization which resulted from the ownership
changes could adversely impact our future operating results and financial condition.
In addition, we can within nine and a half months of the Merger elect under Section 338 of the
Internal Revenue Code to treat the Merger as if it were an asset purchase for federal income tax
purposes. If we make a Section 338 election, generally our tax basis of our assets will equal the
fair market value at the time of the Merger, the intangible assets would be deductible over 15
years under IRC Section 197 and the net operating losses, federal credits and remaining deferred
taxes would be eliminated. Our financial position and results of operations and cash flows could
materially change if we make a Section 338 election.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal sources of liquidity are our cash and cash equivalents, sales of non-core assets,
borrowings and operating cash flow. In addition, we have generated additional liquidity in the past
through the sale of equity and debt securities.
Our cash and cash equivalents decreased $4.1 million in the successor period from April 20, 2011
through July 1, 2011 and the predecessor period from October 2, 2010 through April 19, 2011. The
decrease was primarily due to cash used in operating activities of $34.6 million including $17.1
million related to the Merger and terminated merger transactions, $9.3 million severance payments,
acquisition of Predecessor of $203.9 million, the redemption of our remaining $11.2 million of
outstanding 4.00% convertible subordinated notes due 2026, purchases of property, plant and
equipment of $1.4 million, and employee tax paid by us in lieu of issuing restricted stock units of
$0.7 million offset by the equity contributions of $203.9 million, sale of real property for net
proceeds of $21.1 million, proceeds from the maturity of marketable securities of $20.0 million,
proceeds from the sale of intellectual property of $1.3 million, proceeds from sale of equity
investments of $0.8 million and release of restricted cash of $0.5 million.
Cash flows are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
Period from |
|
|
Period from |
|
|
Nine Fiscal |
|
|
|
April 20, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
Months |
|
|
|
2011 through |
|
|
2010 through |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
July 1, 2011 |
|
|
April 19, 2011 |
|
|
July 2, 2010 |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
(3,348 |
) |
|
$ |
(31,237 |
) |
|
$ |
6,280 |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(204,460 |
) |
|
|
42,994 |
|
|
|
1,080 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
197,422 |
|
|
|
(5,429 |
) |
|
|
(86,947 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(10,386 |
) |
|
$ |
6,328 |
|
|
$ |
(79,587 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
Cash used in operating activities was $34.6 million for the successor period from April 20, 2011
through July 1, 2011 and the predecessor period from October 2, 2010 through April 19, 2011
compared to $6.3 million provided by operating activities for the predecessor nine fiscal months
ended July 2, 2010. Cash used in operating activities for the successor period from April 20, 2011
through July 1, 2011 and the predecessor period from October 2, 2010 through April 19, 2011 was
primarily driven by a net loss of $84.0 million, offset by $39.0 million of net non-cash operating
expenses and a $10.4 million increase from changes in working capital. Cash provided by operating
activities for the predecessor nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010 was primarily driven by $11.8
million in net income and net non-cash operating expenses of $12.4 million, offset by a $17.9
million decrease from changes in working capital.
28
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities was $161.5 million for the successor period from April 20, 2011
through July 1, 2011 and the predecessor period from October 2, 2010 through April 19, 2011
compared to cash provided by investing activities of $1.1 million for the predecessor nine fiscal
months ended July 2, 2010. Cash used in investing activities for the successor period from April
20, 2011 through July 1, 2011 and the predecessor period from October 2, 2010 through April 19,
2011 was primarily driven by the acquisition of the Predecessor for $203.9 million and capital
expenditures of $1.4 million offset by proceeds from the sale of real property of $21.1 million,
proceeds from the maturity of marketable securities of $20.0 million, proceeds from the sale of
intellectual property of $1.3 million, proceeds from the sale of equity investments of $0.8 million
and release of restricted cash of $0.5 million. Cash provided by investing activities for the
predecessor nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010 was primarily due to the release of restricted
cash of $8.5 million associated with our repayment of short-term debt, partially offset by our net
purchase of marketable securities of $6.7 million and capital expenditures of $0.8 million.
Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities was $192.0 million for the successor period from April 20,
2011 through July 1, 2011 and the predecessor period from October 2, 2010 through April 19, 2011
compared to $86.9 million used in financing activities for the predecessor nine fiscal months ended
July 2, 2010. Cash provided by financing activities for the successor period from April 20, 2011
through July 1, 2011 and the predecessor period from October 2, 2010 through April 19, 2011 was
primarily driven by the equity contributions of $203.9 million, offset by the redemption of our
remaining $11.2 million of outstanding 4.00% convertible subordinated notes due 2026 and employee
tax paid by us in lieu of issuing restricted stock units of $0.7 million. Cash used in financing
activities for the predecessor nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010 was primarily driven by the
repurchase of our remaining senior secured notes for $62.0 million, extinguishment of our
convertible subordinated notes for $226.7 million and repayment of $29.1 million of our short-term
debt, partially offset by the common stock offering and issuance of senior secured notes, net of
expenses, of $62.5 million and $168.4 million, respectively.
Recent Financing Transactions
On April 19, 2011, the predecessor Company was acquired for $203.9 million, funded with the
proceeds of equity financings from Golden Gate Capital and affiliated entities.
On March 1, 2011, we redeemed the remaining $11.2 million of 4.00% convertible subordinated notes
due 2026.
On December 22, 2010, we sold certain real property adjacent to our Newport Beach, California
headquarters to Uptown Newport L.P. for $23.5 million, which consisted of $21.5 million in cash and
a limited partnership interest in the property, which we have valued at $2.0 million.
Effective on the date of the Merger, our credit facility with a bank was terminated. No amounts
were due under the facility at the termination date.
We believe that our existing sources of liquidity, together with cash expected to be generated from
operations, will be sufficient to fund our operations, research and development, anticipated
capital expenditures and working capital for at least the next twelve months.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
In accordance with the terms of our senior notes, if a change of control occurs, we must offer to
repurchase the senior notes at a repurchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount of the
senior notes repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the applicable repurchase
date. In connection with the Merger, we commenced a change of control offer (the Offer) on May
27, 2011 to purchase any and all of our senior notes. We currently have outstanding $175.0 million
in principal amount of the senior notes. If all holders of the senior notes accepted the Offer, we
would have been obligated to repurchase the senior notes for an aggregate of $176.75 million plus
accrued and unpaid interest. The Offer expired on June 29, 2011 and was not extended by
us. No senior notes were tendered by their holders under the offer. Except for this and for our
recent property sale transaction discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in
Item 1, there have been no material changes to our contractual obligations from those previously
disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended October 1, 2010. For a
summary of the contractual commitments at October 1, 2010, see Part II, Item 7, page 37 in our 2010
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have made guarantees and indemnities, under which we may be required to make payments to a
guaranteed or indemnified party, in relation to certain transactions. In connection with our
spin-off from Rockwell International Corporation (Rockwell), we assumed responsibility for all
contingent liabilities and then-current and future litigation (including environmental and
intellectual property proceedings) against Rockwell or its subsidiaries in respect of the
operations of the semiconductor systems business of Rockwell. In connection with our contribution
of certain of our manufacturing operations to Jazz Semiconductor, Inc. (now TowerJazz), we agreed
to indemnify TowerJazz for certain environmental matters and other customary divestiture-related
matters. In connection with our sale of the BMP business to NXP, we agreed to indemnify NXP for
certain claims related to the transaction. In connection with our sale of the BBA business to
Ikanos, we agreed to indemnify Ikanos for certain claims related to the transaction. In connection
with the sales of our products, we provide intellectual property indemnities to our customers. In
29
connection with certain facility leases, we have indemnified our lessors for certain claims arising
from the facility or the lease. We indemnify our directors and officers to the maximum extent
permitted under the laws of the State of Delaware.
The durations of our guarantees and indemnities vary, and in many cases are indefinite. The
guarantees and indemnities to customers in connection with product sales generally are subject to
limits based upon the amount of the related product sales. The majority of other guarantees and
indemnities do not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential future payments we could be
obligated to make. We have not recorded any liability for these guarantees and indemnities in our
consolidated balance sheets. Product warranty costs are not significant.
We have other outstanding letters of credit collateralized by restricted cash aggregating $5.1
million to secure various long-term operating leases and our self-insured workers compensation
plan. The restricted cash associated with these letters of credit is classified as other long-term
assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
Special Purpose Entities
We have one special purpose entity, Conexant CF, which is not permitted, nor may its assets be
used, to guarantee or satisfy any of our obligations or those of our subsidiaries. Effective on
the date of the Merger, the credit facility between Conexant CF and a bank was terminated. No
amounts were due under the facility at the termination date.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, (FASB), issued guidance regarding the
presentation of comprehensive income. The new standard requires the presentation of comprehensive
income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a
single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements.
The new standard also requires presentation of adjustments for items that are reclassified from
other comprehensive income to net income in the statement where the components of net income and
the components of other comprehensive income are presented. The updated guidance is effective on a
retrospective basis for financial statements issued for fiscal years, and interim periods within
those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this guidance will not have
a material impact on our financial statements.
In May 2011, the FASB issued additional guidance on fair value measurements that clarifies the
application of existing guidance and disclosure requirements, changes certain fair value
measurement principles and requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements. The
updated guidance is effective on a prospective basis for financial statements issued for fiscal
years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The
adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on our financial statements.
In December 2010, the FASB issued an update to modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for
reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is
required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a
goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill
impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors
indicating that an impairment may exist. The qualitative factors are consistent with the existing
guidance, which requires that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment between annual
tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair
value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. This accounting guidance will be effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and interim periods
within those fiscal years. Early adoption is not permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact
of this guidance on our financial position and results of operations.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk
Our financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, a warrant to purchase Mindspeed common
stock, long-term restricted cash and long-term debt. Our main investment objectives are the
preservation of investment capital and the maximization of after-tax returns on our
investment portfolio. Consequently, we invest with only high credit quality issuers, and we limit
the amount of our credit exposure to any one issuer.
Our cash and cash equivalents are not subject to significant interest rate risk due to the short
maturities of these instruments. As of July 1, 2011, the carrying value of our cash and cash
equivalents approximated fair value.
We hold a warrant to purchase approximately 6.1 million shares of Mindspeed common stock at an
exercise price of $16.74 per share through June 2013. For financial accounting purposes, this is a
derivative instrument and the fair value of the warrant is subject to significant risk related to
changes in the market price of Mindspeeds common stock. As of July 1, 2011, a 10% decrease in the
market price of Mindspeeds common stock would result in a $1.7 million decrease in the fair value
of this warrant. At July 1, 2011, the market price of Mindspeeds common stock was $8.04 per share.
During the third fiscal quarter of 2011, the market price of Mindspeeds common stock ranged from a
low of $7.13 per share to a high of $9.23 per share.
30
Our long-term debt consists of our 11.25% senior secured notes with interest at fixed rates. The
fair value of the 11.25% senior secured notes is based on an indicative bid price provided by the
underwriter of the senior secured notes.
The following table shows the fair values of our financial instruments as of July 1, 2011 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
50,408 |
|
|
$ |
50,408 |
|
Mindspeed warrant |
|
|
7,459 |
|
|
|
7,459 |
|
Long-term restricted cash |
|
|
5,069 |
|
|
|
5,069 |
|
Long-term debt: senior secured notes |
|
|
194,249 |
|
|
|
198,188 |
|
Exchange Rate Risk
We consider our direct exposure to foreign exchange rate fluctuations to be minimal. Currently,
sales to customers and arrangements with third-party manufacturers provide for pricing and payment
in U.S. dollars, and, therefore, are not subject to exchange rate fluctuations. Increases in the
value of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies could make our products more expensive, which
could negatively impact our ability to compete. Conversely, decreases in the value of the U.S.
dollar relative to other currencies could result in our suppliers raising their prices to continue
doing business with us. Fluctuations in currency exchange rates could affect our business in the
future. At July 1, 2011, we did not have any foreign currency exchange contracts outstanding.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) and
procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports
under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SECs rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to
management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and
procedures, our management recognized that any system of controls and procedures, no matter how
well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control
objectives, as ours are designed to do, and management necessarily was required to apply its
judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
In connection with the preparation of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, an evaluation was
performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at
the reasonable assurance level as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or
submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and to ensure
that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the
Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Principal Executive
Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal
quarter ended July 1, 2011, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
31
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of our business. These claims
potentially cover a variety of allegations spanning our entire business. The following is a brief
discussion of the most significant claims that have been brought against us in the operation of our
business. We are currently vigorously defending these pending claims. See Note 6 of Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included herein for a further discussion of legal
matters.
Litigation Relating to the Previously Contemplated Merger with SMSC
Between January 10, 2011 and February 11, 2011, the Company, the members of the Companys board of
directors and, in certain of the lawsuits, our President and Chief
Executive Officer, our former
Chief Financial Officer, SMSC and/or Comet Acquisition Corp. were named as defendants in 12
purported class action lawsuits in connection with the transactions previously contemplated by the
SMSC Agreement filed by stockholders in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of
Orange, an additional five such lawsuits filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware and
one such lawsuit filed in the United States District Court, Central District of California. On
February 9, 2011, the first four Delaware actions were
consolidated under the caption In re
Conexant Systems, Inc. Shareholders Litigation, Consolidated C.A. No. 6136-VCP. On March 3, 2011, a
number of the California state plaintiffs filed a stipulation and proposed order to consolidate the
California actions and appoint interim co-lead class counsel. All of the actions have been
voluntarily dismissed. Seven of the California actions were dismissed with prejudice. The
remaining actions were voluntarily dismissed without prejudice.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Other than the risk factors enumerated below, as of the date of this filing, there have been no
material changes to the Risk Factors included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
October 1, 2010, filed with the SEC on November 9, 2010.
Natural disasters in certain regions could adversely affect our supply chain or our customer base
which, in turn, could have a negative impact on our business, the cost of and demand for our
products and our results of operations.
The occurrence of natural disasters in certain regions, such as the recent earthquake and tsunami
in Japan, could have a negative impact on our supply chain, our ability to deliver products, the
cost of our products, and the demand for our products. These events could cause consumer confidence
and spending to decrease or result in increased volatility to the U.S. and worldwide economies. Any
such occurrences could have a material adverse effect on our business, our results of operations
and our financial condition.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
31.1
|
|
Certification of the Principal Executive Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of the Principal
Financial Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a). |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification by Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
32
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONEXANT SYSTEMS, INC.
|
|
Date: August 15, 2011 |
By |
/s/ DAVID C. WALKER
|
|
|
|
David C. Walker |
|
|
|
Vice President of Finance and Chief
Accounting Officer |
|
|
33
EXHIBIT
INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
31.1
|
|
Certification of the Principal Executive Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of the Principal
Financial Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a). |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification by Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
34