defm14a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OMB APPROVAL |
|
|
|
|
|
OMB Number:
|
|
3235-0059 |
|
|
Expires:
|
|
January 31, 2008 |
|
|
Estimated average burden hours per
response |
14. |
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
|
|
|
Filed by the Registrant þ |
|
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
o |
|
|
Check the appropriate box: |
|
|
|
o Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
þ Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
Phelps Dodge Corporation
(Name
of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name
of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the
Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
|
þ No fee required. |
|
o
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and
0-11. |
|
|
|
1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
|
|
o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
|
1) Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
JOINT
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS
MERGER
PROPOSED YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT
The boards of directors of Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge
have approved a merger agreement pursuant to which
Freeport-McMoRan will acquire Phelps Dodge. As we describe in
greater detail in this document, we believe the transaction will
result in significant benefits to each companys
shareholders and will create the worlds largest publicly
traded copper company.
If the transaction is completed, Phelps Dodge shareholders
will have the right to receive 0.67 of a share of
Freeport-McMoRan Class B common stock (which we sometimes
refer to in this document as Freeport-McMoRan common stock or
common stock) and $88.00 in cash, without interest, for each
Phelps Dodge common share they hold. Freeport-McMoRan
shareholders will continue to own their existing shares of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock. Based on the closing sale price
of shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock on November 17,
2006, the implied value of the merger consideration to be
received by Phelps Dodge shareholders in the transaction is
$126.46 per share. This value will fluctuate prior to the
completion of the transaction as a result of changes in the
value of Freeport-McMoRan common stock.
Approximately 137 million shares of Freeport-McMoRan common
stock will be issued to Phelps Dodge shareholders in the
transaction, based on the number of Phelps Dodge common shares,
restricted stock and stock options outstanding on
September 30, 2006, and assuming that all of the Phelps
Dodge stock options are exercised prior to the completion of the
transaction. These shares will represent approximately 41% of
the outstanding common stock of the combined company immediately
after the transaction (38% on a fully diluted basis). Shares of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock held by Freeport-McMoRan
shareholders before the transaction will represent approximately
59% of the outstanding common stock of the combined company
immediately after the transaction (62% on a fully diluted basis).
Your vote is important. We cannot complete the
transaction unless, among other things, the holders of Phelps
Dodge common shares vote to approve and adopt the merger
agreement and the holders of Freeport-McMoRan common stock vote
to approve the amendment of the Freeport-McMoRan certificate of
incorporation to increase the amount of authorized common stock
and to approve the issuance of shares of Freeport-McMoRan common
stock in connection with the transaction. Each of us will hold a
special meeting of our shareholders at the date, time and
location set forth below to vote on these proposals. Whether or
not you plan to attend your companys special meeting,
please take the time to vote by completing and mailing the
enclosed proxy card to us, or by submitting your proxy by
telephone or the Internet, using the procedures in the voting
instructions included with your proxy card.
|
|
|
For Freeport-McMoRan
shareholders:
March 14, 2007
11:00 a.m., Eastern Standard Time
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc.
Hotel du Pont
11th and Market Streets
Wilmington, Delaware
The Freeport-McMoRan board of directors
recommends that Freeport-McMoRan shareholders
vote FOR the amendment of the certificate of
incorporation and FOR the issuance of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock
in connection with the transaction and related items.
|
|
For Phelps Dodge
shareholders:
March 14, 2007
10:00 a.m., Mountain Standard Time
Phelps Dodge Corporation
The Heard Museum
2301 North Central Avenue
Phoenix, Arizona
The Phelps Dodge board of directors
recommends that Phelps Dodge
shareholders vote FOR the approval and adoption of
the merger agreement and related items.
|
This document describes the shareholder meetings, the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement (which we
refer to generally in this document as the transaction),
documents related to the transaction and other related matters.
Please read this entire document carefully, including the
section discussing risk factors beginning on page 22.
You can also obtain information about our companies from
documents that we have each filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
Freeport-McMoRan Class B common stock is listed on the New
York Stock Exchange under the symbol FCX. Phelps
Dodge common shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange
under the symbol PD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
James R. Moffett
|
|
J. Steven Whisler
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer
|
Freeport-McMoRan Copper &
Gold Inc.
|
|
Phelps Dodge Corporation
|
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of the
Freeport-McMoRan common stock to be issued in connection with
the transaction or determined if this document is truthful and
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The date of this document is February 12, 2007, and it
is first being mailed or otherwise delivered to Freeport-McMoRan
shareholders and Phelps Dodge shareholders on or about
February 13, 2007.
REFERENCES
TO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
This document incorporates important business and financial
information about Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge from
documents that are not included in or delivered with this
document. You can obtain documents incorporated by reference in
this document by requesting them in writing or by telephone from
the appropriate company at the following addresses and telephone
numbers:
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan Copper &
Gold Inc.
|
|
Phelps Dodge Corporation
|
1615 Poydras Street
|
|
One North Central Avenue
|
New Orleans, Louisiana 70112
|
|
Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4414
|
Attention: Investor Relations
|
|
Attention: Assistant General
Counsel and Secretary
|
Telephone:
(504) 582-4000
|
|
Telephone: (602) 366-8100
|
You will not be charged for any of these documents that you
request. If you wish to request documents, the applicable
company must receive your request by March 7, 2007 (which
is five business days before the scheduled date of the special
meetings) in order for you to receive them before the special
meetings.
See Where You Can Find More Information, beginning
on page 120.
Phelps
Dodge Corporation
One North Central Avenue
Phoenix, Arizona
85004-4414
NOTICE OF
SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To Be Held On March 14,
2007
To the Shareholders of Phelps Dodge:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the special meeting of the
shareholders of Phelps Dodge Corporation, a New York
corporation, will be held at The Heard Museum, 2301 North
Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona on March 14, 2007, at
10:00 a.m., Mountain Standard Time, to consider and vote
upon the following:
1. a proposal to approve and adopt the Agreement and Plan
of Merger (referred to in this document as the merger
agreement), dated as of November 18, 2006, among
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc., Phelps Dodge
Corporation and Panther Acquisition Corporation, a direct wholly
owned subsidiary of Freeport-McMoRan, as amended;
2. a proposal to approve an adjournment of the special
meeting, if necessary, to permit solicitation of additional
proxies in favor of the above proposal; and
3. any other business as may properly come before the
special meeting or any adjournments or postponements of the
special meeting.
The Phelps Dodge board of directors recommends that Phelps Dodge
shareholders vote FOR the approval and adoption of the
merger agreement and FOR an adjournment of the special
meeting, if necessary, to permit solicitation of additional
proxies in favor of the above proposal.
All Phelps Dodge shareholders are cordially invited to attend
this special meeting, although only holders of record of our
common shares at the close of business on February 12,
2007, will be entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the
Phelps Dodge special meeting or any postponement or adjournment
thereof. A list of shareholders entitled to receive notice of
and vote at the special meeting will be available at our offices
located at One North Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona
85004-4414,
during ordinary business hours for the
ten-day
period preceding the date of the special meeting. This list also
will be available at the special meeting.
The accompanying document describes the proposed transaction
in more detail. We encourage you to read the entire document
carefully, including the merger agreement, which is included as
Appendix A to the document.
Whether or not you expect to attend the special meeting, to
ensure that your shares are represented at the special meeting,
please complete, date, sign and return the enclosed proxy card
in the envelope that has been provided or vote your shares by
using a touch-tone telephone or through the Internet, as
explained in the proxy voting instructions attached to the proxy
card. No postage is required for mailing in the United States.
Voting by mail, by telephone or through the Internet will not
prevent you from voting in person at the meeting. If you are
able to attend the meeting, you may revoke your proxy and vote
your shares in person even if you have previously completed and
returned the enclosed proxy card or voted by telephone or
through the Internet. Thank you for acting promptly.
J. Steven Whisler
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
February 12, 2007
Phoenix, Arizona
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
APPENDICES
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE TRANSACTION
AND THE SPECIAL SHAREHOLDER MEETINGS
|
|
|
Q: |
|
When are the shareholder meetings? |
|
A: |
|
Each companys meeting will take place on March 14,
2007, at the time and location specified on the cover page of
this document. |
|
Q: |
|
What do I need to do now? |
|
A: |
|
After you have carefully read this entire document, please vote
your shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock or your Phelps
Dodge common shares. You may do this either by completing,
signing, dating and mailing the enclosed proxy card or by
submitting your proxy by telephone or through the Internet, as
explained in the voting instructions attached to your proxy
card. This will enable your shares to be represented and voted
at the Freeport-McMoRan special meeting or the Phelps Dodge
special meeting, as applicable. If you submit a valid proxy and
do not indicate how you want to vote, we will count your proxy
as a vote in favor of the proposals described in this document
submitted at your shareholder meeting. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Freeport-McMoRan board of directors recommends that
Freeport-McMoRan shareholders vote FOR the amendment to the
Freeport-McMoRan certificate of incorporation, FOR the issuance
of Freeport-McMoRan common stock in connection with the
transaction and FOR the adjournment of the special meeting, if
necessary, to permit solicitation of additional proxies in favor
of the above proposals. |
|
|
|
The Phelps Dodge board of directors recommends that Phelps
Dodge shareholders vote FOR the approval and adoption of the
merger agreement and FOR the adjournment of the special meeting,
if necessary, to permit solicitation of additional proxies in
favor of the above proposal. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What shareholder votes are required? |
|
A: |
|
Freeport-McMoRan shareholders are being asked to approve an
amendment of the Freeport-McMoRan certificate of incorporation,
which includes increasing the authorized number of shares of
Freeport-McMoRan
capital stock to 750,000,000 and increasing the authorized
number of shares of common stock to 700,000,000. The approval of
this proposal, and therefore the consummation of the
transaction, requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of the outstanding shares of Freeport-McMoRan common
stock. |
|
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan shareholders are also being asked to approve
the issuance of Freeport-McMoRan common stock in the
transaction. The approval of this proposal, and therefore the
consummation of the transaction, requires the affirmative vote
of a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy at the
Freeport-McMoRan
special meeting. |
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge shareholders are being asked to approve and adopt
the merger agreement. The approval of this proposal, and
therefore the consummation of the transaction, requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of
662/3%
of the outstanding Phelps Dodge common shares. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Why is my vote important? |
|
A: |
|
If you do not return your proxy card, submit your proxy by
telephone or through the Internet or vote in person at your
special meeting, it will be more difficult for each of
Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge to obtain the necessary quorum
to hold its special meeting and the shareholder approval
necessary to consummate the proposed transaction. |
|
Q: |
|
If my shares are held in street name by my
broker, will my broker automatically vote my shares
for me? |
|
A: |
|
No. Your broker will only vote your shares if you provide
your broker with voting instructions. You should instruct your
broker to vote your shares by following the directions your
broker provides you. Please check the voting instruction form
used by your broker to see if it offers telephone or Internet
voting. |
ii
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What if I fail to instruct my broker with respect to those
items that are necessary to consummate the transaction? |
|
A: |
|
If you are a Freeport-McMoRan shareholder: |
|
|
|
|
|
with respect to the proposal to amend the
Freeport-McMoRan certificate of incorporation, a broker non-vote
will be counted toward a quorum at the Freeport-McMoRan special
meeting but will have the same effect as a vote against the
proposal; and
|
|
|
|
with respect to the proposal to issue additional
shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock to Phelps Dodge
shareholders in connection with the transaction, broker
non-votes will not be considered a vote cast for
purposes of satisfying the 50% vote cast requirement
and will have the effect of reducing the aggregate number of
shares voting and the number of affirmative votes required to
approve this proposal.
|
|
|
|
If you are a Phelps Dodge shareholder, a broker non-vote will be
counted toward a quorum at the Phelps Dodge special meeting but
will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal to
approve and adopt the merger agreement. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Can I attend the special meeting and vote my shares in
person? |
|
A: |
|
All Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge shareholders are invited
to attend their respective special meetings. However, only
shareholders of record as of February 12, 2007 will be
entitled to vote in person at the special meetings. If a bank,
broker or other nominee holds your shares, then you are not the
holder of record and you must ask your bank, broker or other
nominee how you can vote in person at the special meeting. If
your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other
nominee, your admission ticket is the left side of your voting
instruction form. |
|
Q: |
|
How do I vote my shares if I am a participant in a Phelps
Dodge employee benefit plan? |
|
A: |
|
If you are a participant in the Phelps Dodge Employee Savings
Plan or The Phelps Dodge Corporation Supplemental Savings Plan,
you can direct the plans trustee to vote the Phelps Dodge
shares credited to your account as of the record date. Any of
your shares for which no directions are received will be voted
by the trustee in accordance with the provisions of the trust
agreement. The trustee of the Phelps Dodge Employee Savings Plan
and The Phelps Dodge Corporation Supplemental Savings Plan is JP
Morgan Chase Bank. |
|
Q: |
|
Can I change my vote? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. If you are a holder of record, you can change your proxy
instructions after you have submitted your proxy card, or
submitted your proxy by telephone or through the Internet, by: |
|
|
|
|
|
submitting a written notice revoking your proxy to
the corporate secretary of Freeport-McMoRan or Phelps Dodge, as
applicable;
|
|
|
|
submitting a new proxy card bearing a later date, or
submitting a new proxy by telephone or through the Internet; or
|
|
|
|
attending the special meeting and voting in person.
|
|
|
|
For more detailed procedures on revoking a proxy, see the
description under The Freeport-McMoRan Special
Meeting Proxies Revoking Your
Proxy or The Phelps Dodge Special
Meeting Proxies Revoking Your
Proxy, as applicable. |
|
|
|
If you own your shares through a broker, you must follow the
directions you receive from your broker in order to change or
revoke your vote. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Should I send in my Phelps Dodge stock certificates now? |
|
A: |
|
No. You should not send in your stock certificates at this
time. Phelps Dodge shareholders who hold their shares in
certificated form will need to exchange their Phelps Dodge stock
certificates for the cash and Freeport-McMoRan common stock
provided for in the merger agreement after we complete the
transaction. We will send Phelps Dodge shareholders instructions
for exchanging Phelps Dodge stock certificates at that time.
Phelps Dodge shareholders who hold their shares in book-entry
form will also receive |
iii
|
|
|
|
|
instructions for exchanging their shares after we complete the
transaction. Freeport-McMoRan shareholders will retain their
current stock certificates after the transaction and should not
send in their stock certificates. |
|
Q: |
|
Should I send in my Freeport-McMoRan stock certificates? |
|
A: |
|
No. There is no need to send in stock certificates
representing shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock, which will
remain outstanding following completion of the transaction. If
the proposal to amend the Freeport-McMoRan certificate of
incorporation is approved by Freeport-McMoRan shareholders, the
Class B common stock will be renamed common stock, but you
will not need to send in your stock certificates or take any
other action as a result of this name change. |
|
Q: |
|
Is the transaction expected to be taxable to Phelps Dodge
shareholders? |
|
A: |
|
Generally, yes. The receipt of the merger consideration for
holders of Phelps Dodge common shares pursuant to the
transaction will be a taxable transaction for U.S. federal
income tax purposes. In general, you will recognize capital gain
or loss as a result of the transaction equal to the difference,
if any, between (i) the sum of the fair market value of the
Freeport-McMoRan common stock as of the effective time of the
merger and the cash received in the transaction and
(ii) your adjusted tax basis in the Phelps Dodge common
shares exchanged in the merger. |
|
|
|
|
|
You should read Material United States Federal Income Tax
Considerations of the Transaction beginning on
page 82 for a more complete discussion of the U.S. federal
income tax consequences of the transaction. Tax matters can be
complicated, and the tax consequences of the transaction to you
will depend on your particular tax situation. You should
consult your tax advisor to determine the tax consequences of
the transaction to you. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
When do you expect to complete the transaction? |
|
A: |
|
We expect to complete the transaction during the first calendar
quarter of 2007. However, we cannot assure you when or if the
transaction will be completed. We must first obtain the
necessary approvals of our respective shareholders at the
special meetings and any necessary regulatory approvals. |
|
Q: |
|
Whom should I call with questions? |
|
A: |
|
Freeport-McMoRan shareholders with any questions about the
transaction should call Georgeson Inc., Freeport-McMoRans
proxy solicitors, toll-free at
(866) 767-8979
or the Freeport-McMoRan shareholder investor relations
department at
(504) 582-4000. |
|
|
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge shareholders with any questions about the
transaction should call D.F. King & Co., Inc., Phelps
Dodges proxy solicitors, toll-free at
(800) 769-4414
or collect at
(212) 269-5550.
Non-U.S.
holders may call D.F. King & Co. at +44 20 7920 9700. |
iv
SUMMARY
This summary highlights information from this document that
we believe is important to you in deciding how to vote on the
proposals described in this document. It does not contain all of
the information that may be important to you. We urge you to
read carefully the entire document and the other documents to
which this document refers you in order for you to fully
understand the proposed transaction. See Where You Can
Find More Information beginning on page 120. Each
item in this summary refers to the page of this document on
which that subject is discussed in more detail.
Information
About the Companies (page 34)
Freeport-McMoRan
Copper & Gold Inc.
1615 Poydras Street
New Orleans, Louisiana 70112
(504) 582-4000
http://www.fcx.com
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. is one of the
worlds largest producers of copper and gold.
Freeport-McMoRans operations are conducted through its
principal operating subsidiaries, PT Freeport Indonesia, PT Irja
Eastern Minerals and Atlantic Copper, S.A.
PT Freeport Indonesias operations in Papua, Indonesia,
involve mineral exploration and development, mining and milling
of ore containing copper, gold and silver and the worldwide
marketing of concentrates containing those metals. PT Freeport
Indonesia is also a 25% owner of PT Smelting, which operates a
copper smelter and refinery in Gresik, Indonesia.
PT Irja Eastern Minerals conducts mineral exploration activities
(currently suspended) on land adjacent to that held by PT
Freeport Indonesia. Freeport-McMoRan also conducts mineral
exploration activities (currently suspended) in Papua pursuant
to a joint venture through PT Nabire Bakti Mining. All these
companies operate through Contracts of Work with the Government
of Indonesia which, at the end of 2005, covered approximately
2.2 million acres. Atlantic Copper operates a copper
smelter and refinery in Huelva, Spain.
Phelps
Dodge Corporation
One North Central Avenue
Phoenix, Arizona
85004-4414
(602) 366-8100
http://www.phelpsdodge.com
Phelps Dodge is one of the worlds leading producers of
copper. Phelps Dodge is a world leader in the production of
molybdenum, and the largest producer of molybdenum-based
chemicals and continuous-cast copper rod. Phelps Dodge employs
15,000 people worldwide, primarily through its two divisions,
Phelps Dodge Mining Company, which is referred to in this
document as PDMC, and Phelps Dodge Industries, which is referred
to in this document as PDI.
PDMC is an industry leader in the safe, efficient and
environmentally responsible production of high-quality metals
and minerals. PDMC is a fully integrated producer of copper and
molybdenum, with mines and processing facilities in North and
South America and Europe and processing capabilities for other
minerals as by-products, such as gold, silver and rhenium.
Phelps Dodge Exploration Corp., a subsidiary of Phelps Dodge,
and the Process Technology Center, a division of PDMC, focus on
continued discovery and development of economically viable
mineral reserves and the refinement and creation of production
and process technologies.
PDI consists of Phelps Dodge Wire and Cable, which manufactures
engineered products principally for the global energy sector.
Phelps Dodge Wire and Cable manufactures products for power
distribution, heavy industry, and medical and electronic devices
and products, with operations in the United States, Latin
America, Asia and Africa.
1
Panther
Acquisition Corporation
Panther Acquisition Corporation is a New York corporation and a
wholly owned subsidiary of Freeport-McMoRan. Panther Acquisition
Corporation was formed exclusively for the purpose of completing
the transaction.
Reasons
for the Transaction (page 41 and page 44)
Our companies are proposing to combine because, among other
things, we believe that the transaction will accelerate the
progress being made by each of us toward achieving our
respective strategic objectives.
Our boards of directors believe that:
|
|
|
|
|
the assets and development projects of the combined company,
including geographically diverse ore reserves totaling
75 billion pounds of copper, 41 million ounces of
gold, and 1.9 billion pounds of molybdenum, and expansion
and development projects in the United States, Chile, Peru,
Indonesia and the Democratic Republic of the Congo will
strengthen the industry position of the combined company;
|
|
|
|
the assets and operations of the combined company will be well
positioned to benefit from the strong market for copper
resulting from a scarcity of development projects and a strong
global demand for copper;
|
|
|
|
the combined company will have exploration rights with
significant potential in copper regions around the world,
including Freeport-McMoRans prospective acreage in Papua,
Indonesia, and Phelps Dodges opportunities at its Tenke
Fungurume concessions in the Democratic Republic of the Congo,
in the United States and in South America;
|
|
|
|
the combination of the companies proven management and the
application of best practices in open pit and underground mining
and processing will facilitate the sharing of expertise to
optimize operations across the asset base of the combined
company; and
|
|
|
|
the size and scale of the combined company will allow it to
better compete for customers, development projects, human
resources and suppliers.
|
Both companies also recognize that there are significant risks
associated with the transaction, as described under Risk
Factors beginning on page 22.
Recommendations
to Shareholders (page 41 and page 44)
The Freeport-McMoRan board of directors has approved and deemed
it advisable that the shareholders of Freeport-McMoRan approve
the proposals to amend the Freeport-McMoRan certificate of
incorporation and issue the Freeport-McMoRan common stock in
connection with the transaction. The Freeport-McMoRan board of
directors recommends that the Freeport-McMoRan shareholders vote:
|
|
|
|
|
FOR the amendment to the Freeport-McMoRan certificate of
incorporation;
|
|
|
|
FOR the issuance of Freeport-McMoRan common stock in
connection with the transaction; and
|
|
|
|
FOR the adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary,
to permit solicitation of additional proxies in favor of the
above proposals.
|
The Phelps Dodge board of directors has determined that the
merger agreement and the transaction are fair to and in the best
interests of Phelps Dodge shareholders. The Phelps Dodge board
of directors recommends that Phelps Dodge shareholders vote:
|
|
|
|
|
FOR the approval and adoption of the merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
FOR the adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary,
to permit solicitation of additional proxies in favor of the
above proposal.
|
The
Merger (page 68)
Under the terms of the proposed transaction, Panther Acquisition
Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Freeport-McMoRan, will
merge into Phelps Dodge. As a result, Phelps Dodge will continue
as a surviving
2
corporation and will become a wholly owned subsidiary of
Freeport-McMoRan. Accordingly, Phelps Dodge shares will no
longer be publicly traded.
Merger
Consideration (page 68)
As a result of the transaction, each Phelps Dodge shareholder
will have the right to receive 0.67 of a share of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock and $88.00 in cash, without
interest, for each Phelps Dodge common share held. We expect
that, upon completion of the transaction, former Phelps Dodge
shareholders will own approximately 41% of the combined company
(38% on a fully diluted basis) and Freeport-McMoRan shareholders
will own approximately 59% of the combined company (62% on a
fully diluted basis).
Freeport-McMoRan
will not issue any fractional shares in the transaction. Phelps
Dodge shareholders will instead receive amounts in cash equal to
the value of any fractional shares that would have been issued,
based on the closing price of Freeport-McMoRan common stock on
the trading day immediately following the day on which the
transaction is completed.
Comparative
Market Prices and Share Information (page 21 and
page 107)
Freeport-McMoRan common stock is listed on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol FCX. Phelps Dodge common
shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol PD. The following table sets forth the
closing sale prices of Freeport-McMoRan common stock as reported
on the New York Stock Exchange and the closing sale prices of
Phelps Dodge common shares as reported on the New York Stock
Exchange, each on November 17, 2006, the last trading day
before we announced the transaction, and on February 9,
2007. This table also shows the implied value of a Phelps Dodge
common share, which we calculated by adding $88.00 to the
product of the closing price of Freeport-McMoRan common stock on
those dates and the exchange ratio of 0.67.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freeport-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Value of
|
|
|
|
McMoRan
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Common Shares
|
|
|
Common Shares
|
|
|
November 17, 2006
|
|
$
|
57.40
|
|
|
$
|
95.02
|
|
|
$
|
126.46
|
|
February 9, 2007
|
|
$
|
53.65
|
|
|
$
|
121.95
|
|
|
$
|
123.95
|
|
The market prices of Freeport-McMoRan common stock and Phelps
Dodge common shares will fluctuate before the special meetings
and before the transaction is completed. Therefore, you should
obtain current market quotations for Freeport-McMoRan common
stock and Phelps Dodge common shares.
No
Appraisal Rights (page 48)
Phelps Dodge shareholders are not entitled to appraisal rights
in connection with the transaction.
Freeport-McMoRan shareholders are not entitled to appraisal
rights in connection with the transaction.
Material
United States Federal Income Tax Considerations of the
Transaction (page 82)
The receipt of the merger consideration by a Phelps Dodge
shareholder in exchange for Phelps Dodge common shares pursuant
to the transaction will be a taxable transaction for U.S.
federal income tax purposes. In general, a Phelps Dodge
shareholder who receives the merger consideration in exchange
for Phelps Dodge common shares pursuant to the transaction will
recognize capital gain or loss for United States federal income
tax purposes equal to the difference, if any, between
(i) the sum of the fair market value of the
Freeport-McMoRan common stock as of the effective time of the
merger and the cash received in the transaction and
(ii) the shareholders adjusted tax basis in the
Phelps Dodge common shares exchanged for the merger
consideration pursuant to the transaction. Any gain or loss
would be treated as long-term capital gain or loss if the
shareholder held Phelps Dodge common shares for more than one
year.
Tax matters can be complicated and the tax consequences of
the transaction to Phelps Dodge shareholders will depend on each
shareholders particular tax situation. Phelps Dodge
shareholders should consult their tax advisors to fully
understand the tax consequences of the transaction to them.
3
Interests
of Certain Persons in the Transaction (page 77)
When considering the recommendations of the Freeport-McMoRan and
Phelps Dodge boards of directors that shareholders vote in favor
of the proposals described in this document, you should be aware
that some Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge executive officers
and directors may have interests in the transaction that may be
different from, or in addition to, yours.
Opinions
of Freeport-McMoRans Financial Advisors
(page 50)
Each of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner & Smith Incorporated,
Freeport-McMoRans
financial advisors, delivered its opinion to the
Freeport-McMoRan board of directors that, as of the date of its
opinion and based upon and subject to the assumptions,
qualifications and limitations set forth in its opinion, the
merger consideration to be paid by Freeport-McMoRan pursuant to
the transaction was fair, from a financial point of view, to
Freeport-McMoRan.
The full texts of the written opinions of each of J.P. Morgan
Securities Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner &
Smith Incorporated, dated November 18, 2006, which set
forth the assumptions made, matters considered and limitations
on the review undertaken in connection with the opinions are
attached to this document as Appendix B and
Appendix C, respectively. Freeport-McMoRan shareholders are
urged to read the opinions carefully in their entirety. Each
written opinion is addressed to the Freeport-McMoRan board of
directors, is directed only to the consideration to be paid
pursuant to the transaction and does not constitute a
recommendation to any Freeport-McMoRan shareholder as to how
such shareholder should vote at the Freeport-McMoRan special
meeting.
Opinions
of Phelps Dodges Financial Advisors
(page 59)
In connection with the transaction, Citigroup Global Markets
Inc. and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Phelps
Dodges financial advisors, delivered their respective
opinions as of November 18, 2006 to the Phelps Dodge board
of directors, which were subsequently confirmed in writing, as
to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the Phelps
Dodge shareholders of the merger consideration to be received by
such holders pursuant to the merger agreement.
The full text of the written opinions of Citigroup Global
Markets Inc. and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated,
dated November 18, 2006, are included in this document as
Appendix D and Appendix E, respectively. You should
read the opinions carefully in their entirety for a description
of the respective assumptions made, matters considered and
limitations on the review undertaken by each of Citigroup Global
Markets Inc. and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated.
The opinions of Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Morgan
Stanley & Co. Incorporated were provided for the
information and assistance of the Phelps Dodge board of
directors in connection with its consideration of the
transaction. The opinions of Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated are not a
recommendation as to how any shareholder should vote or as to
any action that a shareholder should take with respect to the
transaction.
The
Merger Agreement (page 68)
The merger agreement is included in this joint document as
Appendix A. We urge you to read the entire merger agreement
because it is the legal document governing the transaction.
Conditions
that Must Be Satisfied or Waived for the Transaction to Occur
(page 74)
As more fully described in this document and the merger
agreement, the completion of the transaction depends on a number
of conditions being satisfied or waived, including receipt of
shareholder approvals and regulatory approvals.
Although we expect to complete the transaction in the first
calendar quarter of 2007, we cannot be certain when, or if, the
conditions to the transaction will be satisfied or waived, or
that the transaction will in fact be completed.
4
Termination
of the Merger Agreement (page 75)
The merger agreement may be terminated by either party if:
|
|
|
|
|
the transaction has not been completed prior to August 31,
2007;
|
|
|
|
applicable law makes the consummation of the transaction illegal
or a final non-appealable injunction prohibits Freeport-McMoRan
or Phelps Dodge from consummating the transaction;
|
|
|
|
either Freeport-McMoRan shareholders or Phelps Dodge
shareholders fail to give the necessary approvals at their
respective shareholder meetings;
|
|
|
|
the other partys board of directors changes its
recommendation of the transaction;
|
|
|
|
there has been an incurable breach by the other party of any
representation or warranty or failure to perform any covenant or
agreement that would result in the failure of that party to
satisfy a condition to the closing;
|
|
|
|
the other party has willfully and materially breached certain
obligations in the merger agreement concerning the solicitation
of alternative transactions, holding a shareholder meeting to
obtain the required shareholder approvals or recommending the
transaction to its shareholders; or
|
|
|
|
that partys board of directors authorizes that party to
enter into a written agreement for a transaction that
constitutes a superior proposal, subject to compliance with
notice and other requirements of the merger agreement including
payment of the applicable termination fee.
|
Termination
Fees; Other Expenses (page 76)
Each party has agreed to pay the other party a termination fee
if the transaction is terminated because:
|
|
|
|
|
such party willfully and materially breached certain obligations
in the merger agreement concerning the solicitation of
alternative transactions, holding a shareholder meeting to
obtain the required shareholders approvals or recommending
the transaction to its shareholders;
|
|
|
|
such partys board of directors changed its recommendation
of the transaction, unless (i) the other party suffered a
material adverse effect prior to the shareholder meeting of the
party whose board of directors changed its recommendation and
(ii) such partys board of directors subsequently
changed its recommendation after determining in good faith
(after receipt of advice from its legal and financial advisors)
that the failure to change its recommendation would be
inconsistent with its fiduciary duties; or
|
|
|
|
such party proposes to enter into a superior transaction.
|
Each party has agreed to pay the other party one-half of the
termination fee if the merger agreement is terminated because
such partys shareholders do not approve the transaction,
unless (i) the other party suffered a material adverse
effect prior to the shareholder meeting of the party whose
shareholders do not approve the transaction and (ii) such
partys board of directors subsequently changed its
recommendation after determining in good faith (after receipt of
advice from its legal and financial advisors) that the failure
to change its recommendation would be inconsistent with its
fiduciary duties.
In addition, each party has agreed to pay the other party the
termination fee (or, if one-half of the termination fee was
previously paid as described above, the remainder of the
termination fee) if each of the following occurs:
|
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement is terminated because the transaction was
not completed by August 31, 2007, or such partys
shareholders do not approve the transaction (except in
circumstances in which one-half of the
break-up fee
was not payable as described above);
|
|
|
|
a proposal for an alternative transaction has been made prior to
August 31, 2007, or the shareholder meeting, as applicable;
and
|
|
|
|
within 12 months following the termination, that party
completes or enters into an agreement providing for an
alternative transaction.
|
5
The amount of the termination fee, in the case of a payment from
Phelps Dodge to Freeport-McMoRan, is $750 million and, in
the case of a payment from Freeport-McMoRan to Phelps Dodge, is
$375 million.
Each party has agreed to reimburse the other party for its
transaction expenses (up to $40 million) if the merger
agreement is terminated because that party incurably breached
its representations, warranties or covenants.
Phelps
Dodge Stock Options and Other Stock-Based Awards
(page 69)
Except as otherwise provided below, the terms of each
outstanding option to purchase Phelps Dodge common shares under
any employee stock option or compensation plan or arrangement of
Phelps Dodge, whether or not exercisable or vested, shall be
adjusted as necessary to provide that each Phelps Dodge stock
option outstanding immediately prior to the closing of the
transaction shall be deemed to constitute a fully vested option
to acquire, on the same terms and conditions as were applicable
under such Phelps Dodge stock option, the number of shares of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock equal to the product of
(i) the number of Phelps Dodge common shares subject to
such Phelps Dodge stock option immediately prior to the
effective time of the merger multiplied by (ii) the sum of
0.67 plus the quotient of (a) $88.00 divided by
(b) the closing price of a share of Freeport-McMoRan common
stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the trading day
immediately preceding the effective time of the merger. The
exercise price per share of Freeport-McMoRan common stock
subject to any such adjusted option will be an amount equal to
the quotient of (i) the exercise price per Phelps Dodge
common share subject to such Phelps Dodge stock option
immediately prior to the effective time of the merger divided by
(ii) the sum referred to in the previous clause
(ii) above.
Phelps Dodge has agreed, by a waiver letter dated
February 8, 2007, that stock options granted as part of
Phelps Dodges annual award program on February 6,
2007 will not vest upon the closing of the merger. Instead, such
options will generally vest in equal installments on each of the
first three anniversaries of the date of grant, in accordance
with Phelps Dodges usual practices. However, such options
will become fully vested if the grantee incurs a
qualifying termination within two years of the
closing of this transaction or retires.
Each outstanding restricted share awarded to a Phelps Dodge
employee shall be converted into a right to receive
0.67 shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock and $88.00 in
cash. Generally, each such restricted share that is outstanding
as of the effective time of the merger will vest as of the
closing of the transaction. Restricted shares awarded as part of
Phelps Dodges annual award program on February 6,
2007 will not vest upon the closing of the merger but contain
provisions that will accelerate the vesting for any such
employee who retires or whose employment is involuntarily
terminated within one year of the closing (or within two years,
in the case of any executive who incurs a qualifying
termination under a
change-of-control
agreement).
The members of the Phelps Dodge board of directors participate
in Phelps Dodges 1997 and 2007 Directors Stock Unit Plans,
which award deferred stock units to directors as part of their
compensation. Upon the effective time of the merger, all
deferred stock units will be cashed out based on the fair market
value of Phelps Dodge common shares immediately prior to the
effective time.
Governance
After the Transaction (page 47)
At the closing of the transaction, the Freeport-McMoRan board of
directors will consist of sixteen directors, thirteen of whom
will be the Freeport-McMoRan directors prior to the closing of
the transaction and three of whom will be current independent
directors of Phelps Dodge (the identity of whom will be agreed
upon by Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge prior to the closing
of the transaction).
Regulatory
and Other Approvals Required for the Transaction
(page 34)
The
Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, referred to as
the HSR Act, and the rules and regulations thereunder, provide
that the transaction may not be completed until pre-merger
notification filings have been made with the Federal Trade
Commission, referred to as the FTC, and the Antitrust Division
of the Department of Justice, referred to as the Antitrust
Division, and the specified waiting period thereunder has
expired or is terminated. Even after the waiting period expires
or is terminated, the Antitrust Division and the FTC retain the
authority to challenge the transaction on antitrust grounds
before or
6
after the transaction is completed. Each of Freeport-McMoRan and
Phelps Dodge filed a notification and report form for the
transaction with the FTC and the Antitrust Division on
December 4, 2006. Early termination of the waiting period
was granted on December 22, 2006. Thus, as far as the HSR
Act is concerned, the parties are free to consummate the
transaction.
Both Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge sell products to
customers based in the European Union. The EC Merger regulation
(Regulation 139 of 2004) requires notification of and
approval by the European Commission of mergers or acquisitions
involving parties with worldwide sales and European Union sales
exceeding given thresholds. Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge
filed a formal notification of the merger with the European
Commission on January 16, 2007. The European Commission
will have until February 20, 2007, which is 25 business
days after receipt of such formal notification, to issue its
decision regarding the merger. This 25-business day period is
extendable for an additional ten-business day period in certain
circumstances. After that period, if the European Commission has
serious doubts as to the compatibility of the merger
with the common market, it will enter into a Phase
II investigation. The standard timetable for a Phase
II investigation is 90 working days. This timetable may be
extended in certain circumstances by either the parties or the
European Commission. There are also procedures for the European
Commission to Stop the Clock if the parties have not
supplied information required by the European Commission.
Listing
of Freeport-McMoRan Common Stock (page 87)
Freeport-McMoRan has agreed to file an application to have the
Freeport-McMoRan common stock to be issued in the transaction
listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
Accounting
Treatment (page 82)
The transaction will be accounted for as a purchase by
Freeport-McMoRan under accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States. Under the purchase method of accounting,
the assets and liabilities of Phelps Dodge will be recorded, as
of completion of the transaction, at their respective fair
values. The financial condition and results of operations of
Freeport-McMoRan after completion of the transaction will
reflect Phelps Dodges net assets and results.
Following the completion of the transaction, the earnings of the
combined company will reflect purchase accounting adjustments,
including the effect of changes in the cost bases for assets and
liabilities on production costs and depreciation, depletion and
amortization expense. Long-lived assets will be evaluated for
impairment when events or changes in economic circumstances
indicate the carrying amount of such assets may not be
recoverable. Metal inventories will be subject to periodic
assessments for
lower-of-cost-or-market
adjustments. The goodwill resulting from the transaction, which
is not subject to amortization, will be reviewed for impairment
at least annually. Any future impairments or market value
adjustments would reduce the asset carrying values and result in
charges to earnings for the combined company.
Freeport-McMoRan
Special Meeting (page 27)
Meeting. The Freeport-McMoRan special meeting
will be held on March 14, 2007, at 11:00 a.m., Eastern
Standard Time, at Hotel du Pont, 11th and Market Streets,
Wilmington, Delaware. At the Freeport-McMoRan special meeting,
Freeport-McMoRan shareholders will be asked to approve
(i) an amendment of the Freeport-McMoRan certificate of
incorporation to increase the authorized number of shares of
Freeport-McMoRan capital stock to 750,000,000, to increase the
authorized number of shares of Class B common stock to
700,000,000, to rename the Class B common stock as common
stock and to delete the provisions and references to the
previously designated classes and series of
Freeport-McMoRan
preferred stock of which no shares are outstanding (other than
the Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock and
the
51/2%
Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock), (ii) the issuance
of shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock in connection with
the transaction and (iii) if necessary, the related
adjournment proposal.
Record Date. Freeport-McMoRan has fixed the
close of business on February 12, 2007 as the record date
for determining the Freeport-McMoRan shareholders entitled to
receive notice of and to vote at the
Freeport-McMoRan
special meeting. Only holders of record of Freeport-McMoRan
common stock on the record date are entitled to receive notice
of and to vote at the Freeport-McMoRan special meeting, and any
7
adjournment or postponement thereof. Each share of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock is entitled to one vote.
Required Vote. The approval of the proposal to
amend the Freeport-McMoRan certificate of incorporation requires
the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of
the Freeport-McMoRan common stock. The approval of the proposal
to issue Freeport-McMoRan common stock in the transaction
requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in
person or by proxy at the Freeport-McMoRan special meeting. With
respect to the proposal to amend the Freeport-McMoRan
certificate of incorporation, a broker non-vote will be counted
toward a quorum but will have the same effect as a vote against
the proposal. With respect to the proposal to issue additional
shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock in connection with the
transaction, broker non-votes will not be considered a
vote cast for purposes of satisfying the 50%
vote cast requirement and will have the effect of
reducing the aggregate number of shares voting and the number of
affirmative votes required to approve this proposal.
As of the Freeport-McMoRan record date, directors and executive
officers of Freeport-McMoRan and their affiliates beneficially
owned or had the right to vote approximately 4.2 million
shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock, or less than 1.6% of
the outstanding Freeport-McMoRan common stock entitled to be
voted at the special meeting. To Freeport-McMoRans
knowledge, the directors and executive officers of
Freeport-McMoRan and their affiliates intend to vote their
Freeport-McMoRan common stock in favor of the issuance of
Freeport-McMoRan
common stock in connection with the transaction.
Phelps
Dodge Special Meeting (page 30)
Meeting. The Phelps Dodge special meeting will
be held on March 14, 2007 at 10:00 a.m., Mountain
Standard Time, at The Heard Museum, 2301 North Central
Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona. At the Phelps Dodge special meeting,
Phelps Dodge shareholders will be asked to vote on the approval
and adoption of the merger agreement and, if necessary, the
related adjournment proposal.
Record Date. Phelps Dodge has fixed the close
of business on February 12, 2007 as the record date for
determining the Phelps Dodge shareholders entitled to receive
notice of and to vote at the Phelps Dodge special meeting. Only
holders of record of Phelps Dodge common shares on the record
date are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Phelps
Dodge special meeting, and any adjournment or postponement
thereof. Each Phelps Dodge common share is entitled to one vote.
Required Vote. The approval and adoption of
the merger agreement, and therefore the consummation of the
transaction, requires the affirmative vote of the holders of
662/3%
of the outstanding Phelps Dodge common shares. The failure of a
Phelps Dodge shareholder to vote with respect to the proposal
will have the same effect as a vote against the approval and
adoption of the merger agreement.
As of the Phelps Dodge record date, directors and executive
officers of Phelps Dodge and their affiliates beneficially owned
or had the right to vote approximately 884,391 Phelps Dodge
common shares, or less than 1% of the outstanding Phelps Dodge
common shares entitled to be voted at the special meeting. To
Phelps Dodges knowledge, the directors and executive
officers of Phelps Dodge and their affiliates intend to vote
their Phelps Dodge common shares in favor of the approval and
adoption of the merger agreement.
8
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF
FREEPORT-MCMORAN
Freeport-McMoRan is providing the following financial
information to aid you in your analysis of the financial aspects
of the transaction. Freeport-McMoRan derived the selected
historical consolidated balance sheet data, consolidated
statement of income data and consolidated statement of cash
flows data as of and for the years ended December 31, 2005,
2004, 2003, 2002 and 2001, from the audited consolidated
financial statements of Freeport-McMoRan for those periods.
Freeport-McMoRan derived the consolidated statement of income
data and consolidated statement of cash flows data for the nine
months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, and the
consolidated balance sheet data as of September 30, 2006
and 2005, from the unaudited consolidated financial statements
of Freeport-McMoRan for those periods. In the opinion of
Freeport-McMoRan management, the unaudited consolidated
financial statements of Freeport-McMoRan for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, have been prepared on a
basis consistent with its audited consolidated financial
statements and include all adjustments, consisting only of
normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation
of the financial position and results of operations for these
periods. The operating results for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006, are not necessarily indicative of the
results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year of
Freeport-McMoRan or the combined company.
You should read the table below together with the historical
financial statements and related notes contained in
Freeport-McMoRans annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 and its quarterly
report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2006 and other
information that
Freeport-McMoRan
has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and
incorporated by reference into this document. See Where
You Can Find More Information beginning on page 120.
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Nine Months
|
|
|
At or for the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
(Financial Data in Dollars, Except Average Shares, and in
Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
4,148.4
|
|
|
$
|
2,689.2
|
|
|
$
|
4,179.1
|
|
|
$
|
2,371.9
|
|
|
$
|
2,212.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,910.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,838.9
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
2,006.5
|
|
|
|
1,247.6
|
|
|
|
2,177.3
|
|
|
|
703.6
|
(a)
|
|
|
823.3
|
|
|
|
640.1
|
|
|
|
542.9
|
|
Net income before cumulative effect
of changes in accounting principles
|
|
|
969.6
|
(b)(c)
|
|
|
471.4
|
(b)
|
|
|
934.6
|
(d)
|
|
|
156.8
|
(e)
|
|
|
169.8
|
(f)
|
|
|
130.1
|
|
|
|
76.5
|
|
Cumulative effect of changes in
accounting principles, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.6
|
)(g)
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)(h)
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common
stock
|
|
|
969.6
|
(b)(c)
|
|
|
471.4
|
(b)
|
|
|
934.6
|
(d)
|
|
|
156.8
|
(e)
|
|
|
154.2
|
(f)
|
|
|
127.1
|
|
|
|
76.5
|
|
Basic net income per common share
|
|
|
5.14
|
|
|
|
2.64
|
|
|
|
5.18
|
|
|
|
0.86
|
|
|
|
0.99
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
Diluted net income per common share
|
|
|
4.64
|
(b)(c)
|
|
|
2.48
|
(b)
|
|
|
4.67
|
(d)
|
|
|
0.85
|
(e)
|
|
|
0.97
|
(f)(g)
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
Dividends paid per common share
|
|
|
2.9375
|
|
|
|
1.75
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic average shares outstanding
|
|
|
188.7
|
|
|
|
178.5
|
|
|
|
180.3
|
|
|
|
182.3
|
|
|
|
155.8
|
|
|
|
144.6
|
|
|
|
144.0
|
|
Diluted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
221.4
|
|
|
|
220.3
|
|
|
|
220.5
|
|
|
|
184.9
|
|
|
|
159.1
|
|
|
|
146.4
|
|
|
|
144.9
|
|
Cash, restricted cash and
investments
|
|
|
698.9
|
|
|
|
392.8
|
|
|
|
763.6
|
|
|
|
552.0
|
|
|
|
498.6
|
|
|
|
115.8
|
|
|
|
149.5
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
5,280.4
|
|
|
|
4,877.8
|
|
|
|
5,550.2
|
|
|
|
5,087.0
|
|
|
|
4,718.4
|
|
|
|
4,192.2
|
|
|
|
4,211.9
|
|
Long-term debt, including current
portion and short-term borrowings
|
|
|
774.5
|
|
|
|
1,386.1
|
|
|
|
1,255.9
|
|
|
|
1,951.9
|
|
|
|
2,228.3
|
(g)
|
|
|
2,038.4
|
|
|
|
2,338.6
|
|
Redeemable preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
|
450.0
|
|
|
|
462.5
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,392.2
|
|
|
|
1,448.0
|
|
|
|
1,843.0
|
|
|
|
1,163.6
|
|
|
|
776.0
|
|
|
|
266.8
|
|
|
|
104.4
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
1,068.5
|
|
|
|
883.0
|
|
|
|
1,552.5
|
|
|
|
341.4
|
|
|
|
572.1
|
|
|
|
512.7
|
|
|
|
509.0
|
|
Capital expenditures and
investments in subsidiaries, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(179.9
|
)
|
|
|
(95.6
|
)
|
|
|
(143.0
|
)
|
|
|
(142.9
|
)
|
|
|
(208.5
|
)
|
|
|
(188.0
|
)
|
|
|
(167.0
|
)
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(147.3
|
)
|
|
|
(93.6
|
)
|
|
|
(134.3
|
)
|
|
|
(64.0
|
)
|
|
|
(132.8
|
)
|
|
|
(148.3
|
)
|
|
|
(300.8
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities
|
|
|
(985.9
|
)
|
|
|
(948.0
|
)
|
|
|
(1,206.1
|
)
|
|
|
(189.6
|
)
|
|
|
16.6
|
|
|
|
(364.2
|
)
|
|
|
(208.6
|
)
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Nine Months
|
|
|
At or for the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
PT FREEPORT INDONESIA OPERATING
DATA, NET OF RIO TINTOS INTEREST
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper (recoverable)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production (000s of pounds)
|
|
|
766,000
|
|
|
|
982,400
|
|
|
|
1,455,900
|
|
|
|
996,500
|
|
|
|
1,291,600
|
|
|
|
1,524,200
|
|
|
|
1,393,400
|
|
Production (metric tons)
|
|
|
347,500
|
|
|
|
445,600
|
|
|
|
660,400
|
|
|
|
452,000
|
|
|
|
585,900
|
|
|
|
691,400
|
|
|
|
632,000
|
|
Sales (000s of pounds)
|
|
|
768,900
|
|
|
|
988,100
|
|
|
|
1,456,500
|
|
|
|
991,600
|
|
|
|
1,295,600
|
|
|
|
1,522,300
|
|
|
|
1,399,100
|
|
Sales (metric tons)
|
|
|
348,800
|
|
|
|
448,200
|
|
|
|
660,700
|
|
|
|
449,800
|
|
|
|
587,700
|
|
|
|
690,500
|
|
|
|
634,600
|
|
Average realized price per pound
|
|
$
|
3.38
|
|
|
$
|
1.67
|
|
|
$
|
1.85
|
|
|
$
|
1.37
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
Gold (recoverable ounces)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
1,217,800
|
|
|
|
1,672,800
|
|
|
|
2,789,400
|
|
|
|
1,456,200
|
|
|
|
2,463,300
|
|
|
|
2,296,800
|
|
|
|
2,634,900
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
1,228,500
|
|
|
|
1,686,700
|
|
|
|
2,790,200
|
|
|
|
1,443,000
|
|
|
|
2,469,800
|
|
|
|
2,293,200
|
|
|
|
2,644,800
|
|
Average realized price per ounce
|
|
$
|
540.67
|
(i)
|
|
$
|
431.88
|
|
|
$
|
456.27
|
|
|
$
|
412.32
|
|
|
$
|
366.60
|
(j)
|
|
$
|
311.97
|
|
|
$
|
269.24
|
|
ATLANTIC COPPER OPERATING
DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concentrate and scrap treated
(metric tons)
|
|
|
724,100
|
|
|
|
716,300
|
|
|
|
975,400
|
|
|
|
768,100
|
|
|
|
964,400
|
|
|
|
1,016,700
|
|
|
|
891,100
|
|
Anodes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production (000s of pounds)
|
|
|
444,200
|
|
|
|
469,100
|
|
|
|
626,600
|
|
|
|
494,400
|
|
|
|
640,000
|
|
|
|
657,000
|
|
|
|
617,300
|
|
Production (metric tons)
|
|
|
201,500
|
|
|
|
212,800
|
|
|
|
284,200
|
|
|
|
224,300
|
|
|
|
290,300
|
|
|
|
298,000
|
|
|
|
280,000
|
|
Sales (000s of pounds)
|
|
|
57,700
|
|
|
|
64,100
|
|
|
|
85,100
|
|
|
|
36,700
|
|
|
|
97,000
|
|
|
|
101,200
|
|
|
|
87,500
|
|
Sales (metric tons)
|
|
|
26,200
|
|
|
|
29,100
|
|
|
|
38,600
|
|
|
|
16,600
|
|
|
|
44,000
|
|
|
|
45,900
|
|
|
|
39,700
|
|
Cathodes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production (000s of pounds)
|
|
|
385,500
|
|
|
|
407,700
|
|
|
|
545,300
|
|
|
|
454,700
|
|
|
|
544,700
|
|
|
|
552,200
|
|
|
|
518,700
|
|
Production (metric tons)
|
|
|
174,900
|
|
|
|
184,900
|
|
|
|
247,300
|
|
|
|
206,200
|
|
|
|
247,100
|
|
|
|
250,500
|
|
|
|
235,300
|
|
Sales (including wire rod and wire)
(000s of pounds)
|
|
|
392,900
|
|
|
|
411,900
|
|
|
|
548,600
|
|
|
|
479,200
|
|
|
|
546,800
|
|
|
|
556,500
|
|
|
|
549,800
|
|
(metric tons)
|
|
|
178,200
|
|
|
|
186,800
|
|
|
|
248,800
|
|
|
|
217,400
|
|
|
|
248,000
|
|
|
|
252,400
|
|
|
|
249,400
|
|
Gold sales in anodes and slimes
(ounces)
|
|
|
569,200
|
|
|
|
422,600
|
|
|
|
542,800
|
|
|
|
316,700
|
|
|
|
929,700
|
|
|
|
813,900
|
|
|
|
831,300
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes a $95.0 million gain on insurance settlement
related to the fourth-quarter 2003 slippage and debris flow
events at the Grasberg open pit and a $12.0 million charge
related to Atlantic Coppers workforce reduction plan. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes losses on early extinguishment and conversion of debt
totaling $30.4 million ($0.14 per share) for the nine
months ended September 30, 2006 and $30.3 million
($0.14 per share) for the nine months ended September 30,
2005, net of related reduction of interest expense. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes $29.7 million ($0.13 per share) of gains on sales
of assets by Atlantic Copper. |
|
(d) |
|
Includes $40.2 million ($0.18 per share) of losses on early
extinguishment and conversion of debt, net of related reduction
of interest expense, and a $4.9 million ($0.02 per share)
gain from the sale of a parcel of land in Arizona held by a
Freeport-McMoRan joint venture. |
|
(e) |
|
Includes a $48.8 million ($0.26 per share) gain on
insurance settlement related to the fourth-quarter 2003 slippage
and debris flow events at the Grasberg open pit; a
$20.4 million ($0.11 per share) gain from the sale of a
parcel of land in Arizona held by a Freeport-McMoRan joint
venture; a $7.5 million ($0.04 per share) gain from
Atlantic Coppers sale of its wire rod and wire assets; a
$12.0 million ($0.06 per share) charge related to Atlantic
Coppers workforce reduction plan; $13.8 million
($0.07 per share) of losses on early extinguishment and
conversion of debt; and a $6.3 million ($0.03 per share)
reduction of interest expense for conversion of debt. |
11
|
|
|
(f) |
|
Includes losses on early extinguishment and conversion of debt
totaling $31.9 million ($0.20 per share), net of related
reduction of interest expense. |
|
(g) |
|
Effective January 1, 2003, Freeport-McMoRan adopted
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 143,
Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, and
recorded a $9.1 million ($0.06 per share) cumulative effect
gain. Effective July 1, 2003, Freeport-McMoRan adopted
SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial
Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and
Equity, and recorded a $24.7 million ($0.16 per
share) cumulative effect charge. Freeport-McMoRans
mandatorily redeemable preferred stock was classified as debt
effective July 1, 2003. SFAS No. 150 does not
allow restatement of prior periods. |
|
(h) |
|
Effective January 1, 2002, Freeport-McMoRan changed the
methodology used in the determination of depreciation associated
with PT Freeport Indonesias mining and milling
life-of-mine
assets. |
|
(i) |
|
Amount was $597.07 before a loss resulting from redemption of
Freeport-McMoRans Gold-Denominated Preferred Stock,
Series II. |
|
(j) |
|
Amount was $357.61 before a gain resulting from redemption of
Freeport-McMoRans Gold-Denominated Preferred Stock. |
12
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF PHELPS DODGE
Phelps Dodge is providing the following financial information to
aid you in your analysis of the financial aspects of the
transaction. Phelps Dodge derived the selected historical
consolidated balance sheet data, consolidated statement of
operations data and consolidated statement of cash flows data as
of and for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, 2003,
2002 and 2001, from the audited consolidated financial
statements of Phelps Dodge for those periods. Phelps Dodge
derived the consolidated statement of income data and the
consolidated statement of cash flows data for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, and the consolidated
balance sheet data as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, from
the unaudited consolidated financial statements of Phelps Dodge
for those periods. In the opinion of Phelps Dodge management,
the unaudited consolidated financial statements of Phelps Dodge
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, have
been prepared on a basis consistent with its audited
consolidated financial statements and include all adjustments,
consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a
fair presentation of the financial position and results of
operations for these periods. The operating results for the nine
months ended September 30, 2006, are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire
fiscal year of Phelps Dodge or the combined company.
You should read the table below together with the historical
financial statements and related notes contained in Phelps
Dodges annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005, and its quarterly
report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2006, and other
information that Phelps Dodge has filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and incorporated by reference into this
document. See Where You Can Find More Information
beginning on page 120.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
At or for the Years Ended December 31,*
|
|
|
|
2006(a)
|
|
|
2005(b)
|
|
|
2005(c)
|
|
|
2004(d)
|
|
|
2003(e)
|
|
|
2002(f)
|
|
|
2001(g)
|
|
|
|
(Financial Data in Dollars and in Millions, Except Per Share
Amounts)
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and other operating revenues
|
|
$
|
8,675.1
|
|
|
$
|
6,031.5
|
|
|
$
|
8,287.1
|
|
|
$
|
6,415.2
|
|
|
$
|
3,498.5
|
|
|
$
|
3,173.2
|
|
|
$
|
3,420.4
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
2,871.5
|
|
|
|
1,260.9
|
|
|
|
1,764.9
|
|
|
|
1,474.9
|
|
|
|
142.8
|
|
|
|
(257.4
|
)
|
|
|
(90.6
|
)
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before extraordinary item and cumulative effect of
accounting changes
|
|
|
1,711.2
|
|
|
|
1,412.6
|
|
|
|
1,583.9
|
|
|
|
1,023.6
|
|
|
|
(21.1
|
)
|
|
|
(356.5
|
)
|
|
|
(377.7
|
)
|
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations, net of taxes**
|
|
|
(17.7
|
)
|
|
|
22.5
|
|
|
|
(17.4
|
)
|
|
|
22.7
|
|
|
|
39.2
|
|
|
|
41.3
|
|
|
|
48.2
|
|
Income (loss) before extraordinary
item and cumulative effect of accounting changes
|
|
|
1,693.5
|
|
|
|
1,435.1
|
|
|
|
1,566.5
|
|
|
|
1,046.3
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
|
(315.2
|
)
|
|
|
(329.5
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
1,693.5
|
|
|
|
1,435.1
|
|
|
|
1,556.4
|
|
|
|
1,046.3
|
|
|
|
94.8
|
|
|
|
(338.1
|
)
|
|
|
(331.5
|
)
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common
share from continuing operations***
|
|
|
8.46
|
|
|
|
7.26
|
|
|
|
8.06
|
|
|
|
5.41
|
|
|
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
|
(2.17
|
)
|
|
|
(2.41
|
)
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per common
share from continuing operations***
|
|
|
8.42
|
|
|
|
6.99
|
|
|
|
7.82
|
|
|
|
5.18
|
|
|
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
|
(2.17
|
)
|
|
|
(2.41
|
)
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
At or for the Years Ended December 31,*
|
|
|
|
2006(a)
|
|
|
2005(b)
|
|
|
2005(c)
|
|
|
2004(d)
|
|
|
2003(e)
|
|
|
2002(f)
|
|
|
2001(g)
|
|
|
|
(Financial Data in Dollars and in Millions, Except Per Share
Amounts)
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common
share from discontinued operations, extraordinary item and
cumulative effect of accounting changes***
|
|
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per common
share from discontinued operations, extraordinary item and
cumulative effect of accounting changes***
|
|
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common
share***
|
|
|
8.37
|
|
|
|
7.37
|
|
|
|
7.92
|
|
|
|
5.53
|
|
|
|
0.46
|
|
|
|
(2.06
|
)
|
|
|
(2.11
|
)
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per common
share***
|
|
|
8.33
|
|
|
|
7.10
|
|
|
|
7.69
|
|
|
|
5.29
|
|
|
|
0.46
|
|
|
|
(2.06
|
)
|
|
|
(2.11
|
)
|
Cash dividends declared per common
share****
|
|
|
4.5875
|
|
|
|
0.4375
|
|
|
|
3.125
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.375
|
|
Cash (including restricted cash)
|
|
|
4,126.2
|
|
|
|
2,505.3
|
|
|
|
1,937.5
|
|
|
|
1,200.1
|
|
|
|
683.8
|
|
|
|
349.8
|
|
|
|
386.9
|
|
Current assets (including cash)
|
|
|
6,678.1
|
|
|
|
4,479.3
|
|
|
|
4,070.7
|
|
|
|
2,661.7
|
|
|
|
1,790.0
|
|
|
|
1,428.2
|
|
|
|
1,531.2
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
13,449.1
|
|
|
|
10,242.0
|
|
|
|
10,358.0
|
|
|
|
8,594.1
|
|
|
|
7,272.9
|
|
|
|
7,029.0
|
|
|
|
7,584.3
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
921.6
|
|
|
|
730.7
|
|
|
|
694.5
|
|
|
|
1,096.9
|
|
|
|
1,959.0
|
|
|
|
2,110.6
|
|
|
|
2,871.6
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
796.4
|
|
|
|
656.6
|
|
|
|
677.7
|
|
|
|
972.2
|
|
|
|
1,703.9
|
|
|
|
1,948.4
|
|
|
|
2,538.3
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
6,483.9
|
|
|
|
5,824.3
|
|
|
|
5,601.6
|
|
|
|
4,343.1
|
|
|
|
3,063.8
|
|
|
|
2,813.6
|
|
|
|
2,730.1
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
3,326.2
|
|
|
|
1,299.1
|
|
|
|
1,769.7
|
|
|
|
1,700.1
|
|
|
|
461.6
|
|
|
|
359.1
|
|
|
|
310.7
|
|
Capital expenditures and
investments in subsidiaries, net of cash received and acquired
|
|
|
(830.0
|
)
|
|
|
(403.7
|
)
|
|
|
(698.2
|
)
|
|
|
(317.3
|
)
|
|
|
(102.4
|
)
|
|
|
(133.2
|
)
|
|
|
(311.0
|
)
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(478.5
|
)
|
|
|
(47.2
|
)
|
|
|
(368.0
|
)
|
|
|
(291.0
|
)
|
|
|
(87.7
|
)
|
|
|
(140.3
|
)
|
|
|
(266.8
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities
|
|
|
(687.7
|
)
|
|
|
(53.2
|
)
|
|
|
(685.8
|
)
|
|
|
(947.2
|
)
|
|
|
(48.8
|
)
|
|
|
(244.8
|
)
|
|
|
101.0
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
At or for the Years Ended December 31,*
|
|
|
|
2006(a)
|
|
|
2005(b)
|
|
|
2005(c)
|
|
|
2004(d)
|
|
|
2003(e)
|
|
|
2002(f)
|
|
|
2001(g)
|
|
|
|
(Financial Data in Dollars and in Millions, Except Per Share
Amounts)
|
|
|
COPPER
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper production (pro rata
basis thousand tons)
|
|
|
755.3
|
|
|
|
787.6
|
|
|
|
1,042.3
|
|
|
|
1,081.7
|
|
|
|
1,042.5
|
|
|
|
1,012.1
|
|
|
|
1,145.2
|
|
Copper production (pro rata
basis million pounds)
|
|
|
1,510.6
|
|
|
|
1,575.2
|
|
|
|
2,084.6
|
|
|
|
2,163.4
|
|
|
|
2,085.0
|
|
|
|
2,024.2
|
|
|
|
2,290.4
|
|
Copper sales from own mines (pro
rata basis thousand tons)
|
|
|
754.0
|
|
|
|
791.0
|
|
|
|
1,051.6
|
|
|
|
1,089.1
|
|
|
|
1,052.6
|
|
|
|
1,034.5
|
|
|
|
1,156.0
|
|
Copper sales from own mines (pro
rata basis million pounds)
|
|
|
1,508.0
|
|
|
|
1,582.0
|
|
|
|
2,103.2
|
|
|
|
2,178.2
|
|
|
|
2,105.2
|
|
|
|
2,069.0
|
|
|
|
2,312.0
|
|
COMEX copper price (per pound)(h)
|
|
$
|
3.06
|
|
|
$
|
1.57
|
|
|
$
|
1.68
|
|
|
$
|
1.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
|
$
|
0.73
|
|
LME copper price (per pound)(i)
|
|
$
|
3.00
|
|
|
$
|
1.58
|
|
|
$
|
1.67
|
|
|
$
|
1.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
2005 and 2004 reflected full consolidation of El Abra and
Candelaria; prior to 2004, El Abra and Candelaria are reflected
on a pro rata basis (51% and 80%, respectively). |
|
** |
|
As a result of Phelps Dodges sale of Columbian Chemicals
Company, which is referred to in this document as Columbian,
previously disclosed as its Specialty Chemicals segment, the
operating results for Columbian have been reported separately
from continuing operations and shown as discontinued operations
for all periods presented in the consolidated statement of
income data. |
|
*** |
|
Basic and diluted earnings per common share have been adjusted
to reflect the March 10, 2006, stock split for all periods
presented. |
|
**** |
|
All periods presented reflect post-split cash dividends per
common share. |
|
|
|
|
|
All references below to earnings or losses per common share are
based on diluted earnings or losses per common share and have
been adjusted to reflect the March 10, 2006 stock split. |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Reported amounts for the first nine months of 2006 included
after-tax, net special charges of $38.8 million, or 19
cents per common share, for environmental provisions;
$30.3 million, or 15 cents per common share, associated
with discontinued operations in connection with the sale of
Columbian; $7.7 million, or 4 cents per common share, for
asset impairment charges; $5.1 million or 3 cents per
common share, associated with the completion of the sale of
substantially all of Phelps Dodges North American magnet
wire assets; $4.7 million, or 2 cents per common share,
associated with the sale of Phelps Dodges High Performance
Conductors of SC & GA, Inc., which is referred to in
this document as HPC; and $1.2 million, or 1 cent per
common share, for the dissolution of an international wire and
cable entity; partially offset by after-tax, net special gains
of $62.5 million, or 31 cents per common share, associated
with the termination of the combination agreement with Inco
Ltd.; $5.0 million, or 3 cents per common share, for
historical legal matters; and $0.4 million for the sale of
non-core real estate. |
|
(b) |
|
Reported amounts for the first nine months of 2005 included
after-tax, net special gains of $388.0 million, or $1.92
per common share, for the sale of a cost-basis investment;
$172.9 million, or 86 cents per common share, for a change
in interest gain at Cerro Verde; and $15.7 million, or 8 cents
per common share, for legal matters; partially offset by
after-tax, net special charges of $322.8 million, or $1.60
per common share, for asset impairment charges;
$60.0 million, or 30 cents per common share, for
environmental provisions; $41.3 million, or 21 cents per
common share, for early debt extinguishment costs; and tax
expense of $2.4 million, or 1 cent per common share, for
foreign dividend taxes. |
|
(c) |
|
Reported amounts for 2005 included after-tax, net special
charges of $331.8 million, or $1.64 per common share, for
asset impairment charges; tax expense of $88.1 million, or
44 cents per common share, |
15
|
|
|
|
|
for foreign dividend taxes; $86.4 million, or 42 cents per
common share, for environmental provisions; $42.6 million,
or 21 cents per common share, associated with discontinued
operations in connection with the sale of Columbian;
$41.3 million, or 20 cents per common share, for early debt
extinguishment costs; $34.5 million (net of minority
interest), or 17 cents per common share, for tax on unremitted
foreign earnings; $23.6 million, or 12 cents per common
share, for a tax charge associated with minimum pension
liability reversal; $10.1 million, or 5 cents per common
share, for cumulative effect of accounting change;
$5.9 million, or 3 cents per common share, for transaction
and employee-related costs associated with the sale of
substantially all of Phelps Dodges North American magnet
wire assets; partially offset by after-tax, net special gains of
$388.0 million, or $1.92 per common share, for the sale of
a cost-basis investment; $181.7 million, or 89 cents per
common share, for change in interest gains at Cerro Verde and
Ojos del Salado; $15.6 million, or 8 cents per common
share, for legal matters; $11.9 million, or 6 cents per
common share, for the reversal of PD Brazils deferred tax
asset valuation allowance; $8.5 million, or 4 cents per
common share, for the sale of non-core real estate;
$4.0 million, or 2 cents per common share, for the reversal
of U.S. deferred tax asset valuation allowance;
$0.4 million for environmental insurance recoveries; and
$0.1 million for Magnet Wire restructuring activities. The
after-tax, net special charges of $42.6 million associated
with discontinued operations consisted of $67.0 million
(net of minority interests), or 33 cents per common share, for a
goodwill impairment charge; taxes of $7.6 million, or 4
cents per common share, associated with the sale and dividends
paid in 2005; and $5.0 million, or 2 cents per common
share, for a loss on disposal of Columbian associated with
transaction and employee-related costs; partially offset by a
deferred income tax effect of $37.0 million, or 18 cents
per common share. |
|
(d) |
|
Reported amounts for 2004 included after-tax, net special
charges of $44.7 million, or 23 cents per common share, for
environmental provisions; $30.9 million (net of minority
interests), or 15 cents per common share, for early debt
extinguishment costs; $9.9 million, or 5 cents per common
share, for the write-down of two cost-basis investments;
$9.6 million, or 5 cents per common share, for taxes on
anticipated foreign dividends; $9.0 million, or 5 cents per
common share, for a deferred tax asset valuation allowance at
Phelps Dodges Brazilian wire and cable operation;
$7.6 million, or 4 cents per common share, for Magnet Wire
restructuring activities; $5.9 million, or 3 cents per
common share, for asset impairment charges (included
$4.5 million, or 2 cents per common share, for discontinued
operations); and $0.7 million for interest on a Texas
franchise tax matter; partially offset by after-tax, net special
gains of $30.0 million, or 15 cents per common share, for
the reversal of a U.S. deferred tax asset valuation allowance;
$15.7 million (net of minority interest), or 8 cents per
common share, for the reversal of an El Abra deferred tax asset
valuation allowance; $10.1 million, or 5 cents per common
share, for the gain on the sale of uranium royalty rights;
$7.4 million, or 4 cents per common share, for
environmental insurance recoveries; and $4.7 million, or 3
cents per common share, for the settlement of historical legal
matters. |
|
(e) |
|
Reported amounts for 2003 included after-tax, net special gains
of $68.3 million, or 38 cents per common share, for an
extraordinary gain associated with the acquisition of Phelps
Dodges partners one-third interest in Chino Mines
Company; $8.4 million, or 5 cents per common share, for the
cumulative effect of an accounting change; $6.4 million, or
4 cents per common share, for the sale of a cost-basis
investment; $2.4 million, or 1 cent per common share, for
the termination of a foreign postretirement benefit plan
associated with discontinued operations; a tax benefit of
$1.0 million, or 1 cent per common share, related to
additional 2001 net operating loss carryback; $0.5 million
for environmental insurance recoveries; and $0.2 million
for the reassessment of prior restructuring programs; partially
offset by after-tax, net special charges of $27.0 million,
or 16 cents per common share, for environmental provisions
(included a gain of $0.5 million for discontinued
operations); $8.0 million or 4 cents per common share, for
a potential Texas franchise tax matter; $2.9 million, or 2
cents per common share, for the settlement of historical legal
matters; and $2.6 million, or 1 cent per common share, for
asset and goodwill impairment charges. |
|
(f) |
|
Reported amounts for 2002 included after-tax, net special
charges of $153.5 million, or 91 cents per common share,
for PDMC asset impairment charges and closure provisions;
$53.0 million, or 31 cents per common share, for historical
lawsuit settlements; $45.0 million, or 27 cents per common
share, for a |
16
|
|
|
|
|
historical arbitration award; $26.6 million, or 16 cents
per common share, for early debt extinguishment costs;
$23.0 million, or 14 cents per common share, for
restructuring activities; $22.9 million, or 13 cents per
common share, for the cumulative effect of an accounting change;
$14.0 million, or 8 cents per common share, for
environmental provisions (included a gain of $0.6 million
for discontinued operations); $1.2 million, or 1 cent per
common share, for the write-off of two cost-basis investments;
and $1.0 million, or 1 cent per common share, for the
settlement of legal matters; partially offset by a tax benefit
of $66.6 million, or 40 cents per common share, related to
the net operating loss carryback prior to 2002 resulting from a
change in U.S. tax legislation; after-tax, net special gains of
$29.1 million, or 17 cents per common share, for
environmental insurance recoveries; $22.6 million, or 13
cents per common share, for the gain on the sale of a non-core
parcel of real estate; and $13.0 million, or 8 cents per
common share, for the release of deferred taxes previously
provided with regard to Plateau Mining Corporation. |
|
(g) |
|
Reported amounts for 2001 included after-tax, net special gains
of $61.8 million, or 39 cents per common share, for
environmental insurance recoveries; $39.9 million, or 25
cents per common share, for the gain on the sale of Sossego; and
$9.0 million, or 6 cents per common share, for an insurance
settlement for potential legal matters; offset by after-tax, net
special charges of $57.9 million, or 37 cents per common
share, for a deferred tax valuation allowance at El Abra;
$31.1 million, or 20 cents per common share, for
environmental provisions (including $1.4 million, or 1 cent
per common share, for discontinued operations);
$29.8 million, or 19 cents per common share, for
restructuring activities; $12.9 million, or 8 cents per
common share, for investment write-downs; $3.3 million, or
2 cents per common share, for asset impairment charges;
$2.0 million, or 1 cent per common share, for the
cumulative effect of an accounting change; and
$0.1 million, net, for other items. |
|
(h) |
|
New York Commodity Exchange average spot price per
pound cathodes. |
|
(i) |
|
London Metal Exchange average spot price per pound
cathodes. |
SUMMARY
SELECTED UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The transaction will be accounted for under the purchase method
of accounting, which means that the assets and liabilities of
Phelps Dodge will be recorded, as of completion of the
transaction, at their fair values and added to those of
Freeport-McMoRan. For a more detailed description of purchase
accounting, see Accounting Treatment.
For illustrative purposes only, we have presented below summary
selected unaudited pro forma combined financial information that
is intended to provide you with a better picture of what the
financial results might have looked like had Freeport-McMoRan
and Phelps Dodge already been combined. The unaudited pro forma
combined balance sheet combines the historical consolidated
balance sheets of Freeport-McMoRan and of Phelps Dodge as of
September 30, 2006, giving effect to the transaction as if
it occurred on September 30, 2006. The unaudited pro forma
combined statements of income combine the historical
consolidated statements of income of Freeport-McMoRan and of
Phelps Dodge for the year ended December 31, 2005, and the
nine months ended September 30, 2006, giving effect to the
transaction as if it occurred on January 1, 2005. The
combined financial information would have been different,
perhaps materially, had the companies actually been combined as
of that date. The pro forma information does not reflect the
effect of asset dispositions, if any, or cost savings that may
result from the transaction or non-recurring charges directly
attributable to the transaction. You should not rely on the pro
forma information as being indicative of the historical results
that would have occurred had the companies been combined as of
any earlier date or the future results that may be achieved
after the transaction. The following information has been
derived from, and should be read in conjunction with, the
unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements and
related notes included in this document.
17
Pro Forma Combined Statement of Income Data (amounts in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
12,823
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
12,466
|
(a)
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
8,021
|
|
|
|
8,730
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
4,444
|
|
|
|
3,367
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
|
|
1,493
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes, minority interests and preferred dividends
|
|
|
3,617
|
|
|
|
2,515
|
|
Income from continuing operations
applicable to common stock
|
|
|
1,500
|
(a)
|
|
|
940
|
(a)
|
Pro Forma Combined Balance Sheet Data (amounts in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
2,313
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
5,842
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
40,674
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
17,759
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Amounts are net of charges for
mark-to-market
losses on Phelps Dodges copper price protection program
totaling $1,215.1 million in revenues and
$923.5 million in income from continuing operations
applicable to common stock for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006, and $411.0 million in revenues and
$255.4 million in income from continuing operations
applicable to common stock for the year ended December 31,
2005. |
COMPARATIVE
PER SHARE DATA
The following table sets forth selected historical share, net
income per share and book value per share information of
Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge and unaudited pro forma
combined share, net income per share and book value per share
information after giving effect to the proposed transaction,
assuming that 0.67 shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock
had been issued in exchange for each outstanding Phelps Dodge
common share. You should read this information in conjunction
with the selected historical financial information included
elsewhere in this document and the historical financial
statements of Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge and related
notes that are incorporated in this document by reference. See
Where You Can Find More Information on page 120.
The unaudited pro forma combined share, net income per share and
book value per share information is derived from, and should be
read in conjunction with, the unaudited pro forma condensed
combined financial statements and related notes included in this
document. The historical share, net income per share and book
value per share information is derived from unaudited
consolidated financial statements of Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps
Dodge as of and for the nine months ended September 30,
2006. The historical share and net income per share information
is derived from audited consolidated financial statements of
Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2005. Phelps Dodge historical per share
amounts have been adjusted to reflect the March 10, 2006
stock split.
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share from
continuing operations
|
|
$
|
5.14
|
|
|
$
|
8.46
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
4.61
|
(a)
|
Diluted earnings per share from
continuing operations
|
|
$
|
4.64
|
|
|
$
|
8.42
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
4.35
|
(a)
|
Book value per share
|
|
$
|
12.15
|
|
|
$
|
31.79
|
|
|
$
|
30.49
|
|
Dividends per share
|
|
$
|
2.9375
|
|
|
$
|
4.5875
|
|
|
$
|
2.9375
|
(b)
|
Shares used in calculating per
share information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (in millions)
|
|
|
188.7
|
|
|
|
202.3
|
|
|
|
325.7
|
|
Diluted (in millions)
|
|
|
221.4
|
|
|
|
203.4
|
|
|
|
358.5
|
|
Book value (in millions)
|
|
|
196.9
|
|
|
|
204.0
|
|
|
|
334.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share from
continuing operations
|
|
$
|
5.18
|
|
|
$
|
8.06
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
2.96
|
(a)
|
Diluted earnings per share from
continuing operations
|
|
$
|
4.67
|
|
|
$
|
7.82
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
2.92
|
(a)
|
Dividends per share
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
|
$
|
3.13
|
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
(b)
|
Shares used in calculating per
share information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (in millions)
|
|
|
180.3
|
|
|
|
195.7
|
|
|
|
317.3
|
|
Diluted (in millions)
|
|
|
220.5
|
|
|
|
202.5
|
|
|
|
357.5
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Earnings per share as presented above are net of the following
per share charges for
mark-to-market
losses from Phelps Dodges copper price protection program: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge Historical
|
|
|
Pro Forma Combined
|
|
|
Nine months ended
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
4.57
|
|
|
$
|
2.84
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
4.54
|
|
|
$
|
2.58
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Pro forma dividends per share are based solely on historical
dividends for Freeport-McMoRan. |
The equivalent Phelps Dodge amounts below are calculated by
multiplying the pro forma combined Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps
Dodge amounts by the exchange ratio of 0.67.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
Equivalent Phelps
Dodge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share from
continuing operations
|
|
$
|
3.09
|
|
|
$
|
1.98
|
|
Diluted earnings per share from
continuing operations
|
|
$
|
2.91
|
|
|
$
|
1.96
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
$
|
20.43
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Dividends per share(a)
|
|
$
|
1.968
|
|
|
$
|
1.675
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Pro forma dividends per share are based solely on historical
dividends for Freeport-McMoRan. |
19
COMBINED
HISTORICAL RESERVES
The following reserve data is derived from
Freeport-McMoRans and Phelps Dodges annual reports
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005. Updated information
concerning Freeport-McMoRans and Phelps Dodges
reserves will be available in each companys annual report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006, when such reports are
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You should
read the table below together with other information about
reserves that Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge have filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission and incorporated by
reference into this document. See Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page 120.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
Freeport-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
McMoRan
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Total Reserves by Company, net
interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper (billion lbs.)
|
|
|
36.5
|
|
|
|
38.4
|
(a)
|
|
|
75.0
|
(b)
|
Gold (million ozs.)
|
|
|
39.8
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
41.0
|
|
Molybdenum (billion lbs.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
Molybdenum
|
|
|
|
(billion lbs.)
|
|
|
(million ozs.)
|
|
|
(billion lbs.)
|
|
|
Total Reserves by Geographical
Region, net interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indonesia(c)
|
|
|
36.5
|
|
|
|
39.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
United States(d)
|
|
|
25.2
|
(a)
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
Chile(d)
|
|
|
5.5
|
(a)
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Peru(d)
|
|
|
7.7
|
(a)
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
75.0
|
(b)
|
|
|
41.0
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes recoverable pounds from mill and leach stockpiles. |
|
(b) |
|
Represents the sum of the numbers before rounding. |
|
(c) |
|
Freeport-McMoRan mine. |
|
(d) |
|
Phelps Dodge mines. |
20
COMPARATIVE
MARKET PRICE INFORMATION
The table below sets forth the closing sale prices of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock and Phelps Dodge common shares as
reported on the New York Stock Exchange each on
November 17, 2006, the last trading day prior to the public
announcement of the transaction, and on February 9, 2007.
The table also shows the implied value of one Phelps Dodge
common share, which we calculated by adding the $88.00 in cash
to be paid per Phelps Dodge common share to the product of the
closing price of Freeport-McMoRan common stock on those dates
and the exchange ratio of 0.67. The market prices of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock and Phelps Dodge common shares
will fluctuate between the date of this document and the time of
the special meetings or the completion of the transaction. No
assurance can be given concerning the market prices of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock or Phelps Dodge common shares
before the completion of the transaction or the market price of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock after the completion of the
transaction. The exchange ratio and cash consideration are fixed
in the merger agreement. One result of this is that the market
value of the Freeport-McMoRan common stock that Phelps Dodge
shareholders will receive in the transaction may vary
significantly from the prices shown in the table below.
Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge shareholders are advised to
obtain current market prices for Freeport-McMoRan common stock
and Phelps Dodge common shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freeport-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Value
|
|
|
|
McMoRan
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge
|
|
|
of Phelps Dodge
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Common Shares
|
|
|
Common Shares
|
|
|
November 17, 2006
|
|
$
|
57.40
|
|
|
$
|
95.02
|
|
|
$
|
126.46
|
|
February 9, 2007
|
|
$
|
53.65
|
|
|
$
|
121.95
|
|
|
$
|
123.95
|
|
See Comparative Market Prices and Dividends for
additional market price information.
21
RISK
FACTORS
In addition to the other information included in this document,
including the matters addressed in Cautionary Statement
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements, you should carefully
consider the following risk factors in determining how to vote
at the special meetings of Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge. In
addition, you should read and consider the risk factors
associated with each of the businesses of Freeport-McMoRan and
Phelps Dodge because these risk factors may also affect the
operations and financial results reported by the combined
company. Descriptions of the risk factors specific to each of
our respective businesses can be found in the documents that
have been filed by each company with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and are incorporated by reference into this document.
See Where You Can Find More Information beginning on
page 120.
Risk
Factors Relating to the Transaction
Shareholders
cannot be sure of the market value of the shares of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock that will be issued in the
transaction.
Upon the completion of the transaction, each Phelps Dodge common
share outstanding immediately prior to the transaction will be
converted into the right to receive a combination of 0.67 of a
share of Freeport-McMoRan common stock and $88.00 in cash,
without interest. Because the exchange ratio for the stock
consideration is fixed in the merger agreement, the market value
of the Freeport-McMoRan common stock issued in the transaction
will depend upon the market price of a share of Freeport-McMoRan
common stock upon the completion of the transaction. This market
value of Freeport-McMoRan common stock will fluctuate prior to
the completion of the transaction and therefore may be different
at the time the transaction is completed from what it was at the
time the merger agreement was signed, the date of this document
or at the time of the shareholder meetings. Accordingly,
shareholders cannot be sure of the market value of the
Freeport-McMoRan common stock that will be issued in the
transaction or the market value of Freeport-McMoRan common stock
at any time after the transaction. Therefore, we recommend that
you obtain current market quotations for Freeport-McMoRan common
stock and Phelps Dodge common shares before voting at your
companys special meeting.
Freeport-McMoRan
may not be able to obtain the financing needed for the
transaction on favorable terms.
Freeport-McMoRan has received commitments from certain lenders
to provide financing of up to $17.5 billion in the
aggregate for the transaction. However, if the proceeds of this
financing are unavailable for any reason, Freeport-McMoRan will
be forced to obtain an alternate source of financing, which may
be more expensive for Freeport-McMoRan, may have an adverse
impact on the combined companys capital structure or may
be unavailable.
The
combined company will be highly leveraged, and its high level of
debt may limit its financial and operating
flexibility.
Freeport-McMoRan is incurring significant debt to consummate the
transaction and to refinance existing debt. It is expected that
Freeport-McMoRan will utilize much of the financing to be made
available pursuant to the financing commitments discussed above
to fund a portion of the cash consideration payable to the
Phelps Dodge shareholders in the transaction. The combined
company, on a pro forma basis, will have approximately
$10.0 billion of debt under its new senior secured term
credit facilities, and either $6.0 billion in aggregate
principal amount of new unsecured senior notes or a
$6.0 billion bridge loan (or some combination of the two).
In addition, approximately $1.6 billion of existing debt of
the combined companies will remain outstanding following the
transaction. The combined company is also expected to have a new
$1.5 billion senior secured revolving credit facility with
at least $1.0 billion of availability.
This debt could limit the combined companys financial and
operating flexibility, including by requiring the combined
company to dedicate a substantial portion of its cash flows from
operations and the proceeds of equity issuances to the repayment
of its debt and the interest on its debt, making it more
difficult for the combined company to obtain additional
financing on favorable terms, limiting the combined
companys ability to capitalize on significant business
opportunities and making the combined company more vulnerable to
22
economic downturns. Additionally, the combined companys
ability to satisfy financial tests or utilize third-party
guarantees for financial assurance with respect to reclamation
obligations may be adversely impacted if its credit ratings were
downgraded below investment grade.
Upon consummation of the transaction, Freeport-McMoRan and all
of its restricted subsidiaries must comply with various
covenants contained in its credit agreement. These covenants
will, among other things, limit the ability of the respective
restricted entities to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional debt or liens or enter into sale/leaseback
transactions;
|
|
|
|
make payments in respect of, or redeem or acquire, debt or
equity issued by Freeport-McMoRan or its subsidiaries, including
the payment of dividends on Freeport-McMoRan common stock;
|
|
|
|
sell assets or enter into mergers or acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
make loans or investments; or
|
|
|
|
enter into hedging transactions.
|
In addition, the combined companies will be subject to financial
covenants requiring them to maintain a minimum ratio of
consolidated EBITDA to consolidated interest expense and not to
exceed a maximum ratio of total indebtedness to consolidated
EBITDA.
Declines
in the market prices of copper, gold and molybdenum could
adversely affect the combined companys earnings and cash
flows, and therefore its ability to repay its
debt.
The earnings and cash flows of the combined company will be
affected significantly by the market prices of copper and, to a
lesser extent, gold and molybdenum. The world market prices of
these commodities have fluctuated historically and will be
affected by numerous factors beyond the control of the combined
company. Many financial analysts who follow the metals markets
are predicting that copper prices will decline significantly
from their current, historically high, levels over the next few
years. A decline in the world market price of one or more of
these commodities could adversely affect the combined
companys earnings and cash flows and therefore could
adversely affect its ability to repay its debt and depress its
stock price.
The
combined company will operate on a broader geographical scope
than either Freeport-McMoRan or Phelps Dodge has operated
individually, and will be exposed to a broader range of
political, social and geographic risks than either company has
been exposed to on an individual basis.
Freeport-McMoRans primary operating assets are located in
Indonesia. Accordingly, the business of the combined company may
be adversely affected by Indonesian political, economic and
social uncertainties, in addition to the usual risks associated
with conducting business in a foreign country. Because Phelps
Dodge does not have any significant operations in Indonesia,
these risks are different from and in addition to those to which
the business of Phelps Dodge has historically been exposed.
Phelps Dodge conducts mining operations in the United States,
Chile and Peru and has a significant development project in the
Democratic Republic of the Congo (which is expected to begin
production by 2009). Accordingly, the business of the combined
company may be adversely affected by political, economic and
social uncertainties in these countries, in addition to the
usual risks associated with conducting business in a foreign
country. Because Freeport-McMoRan has no significant operations
in any of these countries, these risks are different from and in
addition to those to which the business of Freeport-McMoRan has
historically been exposed.
In addition, all of the combined companys revenues and a
significant portion of its costs will be denominated in
U.S. dollars; however, some of its costs, and certain of
its asset and liability accounts, will be denominated in
Indonesian rupiah, Chilean pesos, Peruvian nuevos soles and
other foreign currencies. As a result, the combined company will
be generally less profitable when the U.S. dollar weakens
in relation to these foreign currencies. From time to time, the
combined company may implement currency hedges intended to
reduce its exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange
rates. However, its hedging strategies may not be successful,
and any of its unhedged foreign exchange payments will continue
to be subject to market fluctuations.
23
For further discussion of certain factors to be considered in
connection with the geographical scope of operations of
Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge, see the documents
incorporated by reference in this document and referred to under
Where You Can Find More Information beginning on
page 120.
The
impact of purchase accounting could adversely affect the
combined companys earnings.
Purchase accounting will require the combined company to
allocate the price being paid in the transaction to Phelps
Dodges assets on the basis of their fair values at the
time of the closing of the transaction. Those adjustments are
expected to result in significant increases in the carrying
values of certain acquired assets, including, based on
preliminary estimates, increases of $4.0 billion in metal
inventories and $11.9 billion in property, plant, equipment
and development costs, as reflected in the unaudited pro forma
condensed combined balance sheet contained elsewhere in this
document. The increased value of property, plant, equipment and
development costs will increase the combined companys
depreciation expense, which will reduce reported earnings but
have no effect on cash flows.
A decline in the market price of commodities produced by the
combined company could result in a write down of metal
inventories to recoverable values and the recognition of
impairment charges to property, plant, equipment and development
costs. In addition, the increased value of metal inventories
would cause the combined companys cost of goods sold to
increase in the year those inventories are recognized as sold.
If the combined company changes the historical method of
accounting for Phelps Dodges metal inventories from the
current method of
last-in,
first-out, this increase in the combined companys cost of
goods would occur in the near term. These factors would have the
effect of reducing reported earnings, although they would have
no effect on cash flows.
In addition, the preliminary estimate of goodwill associated
with the transaction is approximately $8.5 billion, as
reflected in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance
sheet contained elsewhere in this document. The combined company
will annually assess this amount for impairment. If the combined
company concludes that the goodwill associated with the
transaction is impaired, the amount of the impairment would
reduce the combined companys reported earnings but would
have no effect on cash flows.
Freeport-McMoRan
and Phelps Dodge may experience difficulties in integrating
their businesses, which could cause the combined company to fail
to realize many of the anticipated potential benefits of the
transaction.
We have entered into the merger agreement because we believe
that the transaction will be beneficial to Freeport-McMoRan,
Phelps Dodge and their respective shareholders. Achieving the
anticipated benefits of the transaction will depend in part upon
whether our two companies integrate our businesses in an
efficient and effective manner. We may not be able to accomplish
this integration process smoothly or successfully. The
difficulties of combining the two companies businesses
potentially will include, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the necessity of coordinating geographically separated
organizations and addressing possible differences in corporate
cultures and management philosophies, and the integration of
certain operations following the transaction will require the
dedication of significant management resources, which may
temporarily distract managements attention from the
day-to-day
business of the combined company;
|
|
|
|
any inability of our management to integrate successfully the
operations of our two companies or to adapt to the addition of
lines of business in which Freeport-McMoRan has not historically
engaged; and
|
|
|
|
any inability of our management to cause best practices to be
applied to the combined companys businesses.
|
An inability to realize the full extent of the anticipated
benefits of the transaction, as well as any delays encountered
in the transition process, could have an adverse effect upon the
revenues, level of expenses and operating results of the
combined company, which may affect the value of the
Freeport-McMoRan common stock after the closing of the
transaction.
24
The
combined company will depend on its senior management team and
other key employees, and the loss of any of these employees
could adversely affect the combined companys
business.
The success of the combined company after the transaction will
depend in part upon the ability of Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps
Dodge to retain senior management and other key employees of
both companies. Competition for qualified personnel can be very
intense. In addition, senior management and key employees may
depart because of issues relating to the uncertainty or
difficulty associated with the integration of the companies or a
desire not to remain with the combined company. Accordingly, no
assurance can be given that Freeport-McMoRan or Phelps Dodge
will be able to retain senior management and key employees to
the same extent that they have been able to do so in the past.
Resales
of shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock following the
transaction and future issuances of equity or equity-linked
securities by Freeport-McMoRan may cause the market price of
shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock to fall.
As of November 10, 2006, Freeport-McMoRan had approximately
197 million shares of common stock outstanding,
approximately 23 million shares authorized for issuance
upon conversion of preferred stock and convertible notes, and
approximately six million shares authorized for issuance upon
the exercise of outstanding options or the vesting of restricted
stock units. Freeport-McMoRan expects that it will issue
approximately 137 million shares of common stock in
connection with the transaction. The issuance of these new
shares and the sale of additional shares that may become
eligible for sale in the public market from time to time upon
the exercise of options (including Freeport-McMoRan options that
will replace existing Phelps Dodge options) could have the
effect of depressing the market price for shares of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock. Also, because many Phelps Dodge
shareholders are also shareholders of Freeport-McMoRan, some may
decide to sell rather than hold the additional shares of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock they will receive in the
transaction. The sale of those shares could also have the effect
of depressing the market price for shares of Freeport-McMoRan
common stock.
In addition, Freeport-McMoRan intends to consider opportunities
following the transaction to reduce debt through issuances of
equity and equity-linked securities. The issuance of those
securities could also have the effect of depressing the market
price for the shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock.
The
trading price of shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock
following the transaction may be affected by factors different
from those affecting the trading price of Phelps Dodge common
shares and shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock prior to the
transaction.
Following completion of the transaction, the results of
operations of the combined company, as well as the trading price
of its common stock, may be affected by factors different from
those currently affecting Phelps Dodges results of
operations and the trading price of Phelps Dodge common shares.
Certain of the significant risks relating to
Freeport-McMoRans business that the Phelps Dodge board of
directors considered in connection with the proposed transaction
are set forth under The Transaction Phelps
Dodge Reasons for the Transaction; Recommendation of the Phelps
Dodge Board of Directors on page 44. For further
discussion of the businesses of Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps
Dodge and of certain factors to consider in connection with
those businesses, see the documents incorporated by reference in
this document and referred to under Where You Can Find
More Information beginning on page 120.
In addition, the trading price of shares of Freeport-McMoRan
common stock following the transaction may be affected by
factors different from those affecting the trading price of
shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock prior to the
transaction. Following the transaction, Freeport-McMoRan will
have significantly greater indebtedness and will derive a
significantly smaller proportion of its revenues from gold.
Current shareholders of Freeport-McMoRan may decide to sell
their shares as a result of those changes, which could have the
effect of depressing the market price of shares of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock.
Some
of Freeport-McMoRans and Phelps Dodges officers and
directors have interests in the transaction that may influence
them to support or approve the transaction.
Some of the directors of Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge who
recommend that you vote in favor of the proposals to be
considered at the special meetings, and the officers of
Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps
25
Dodge who provided information to their respective boards of
directors relating to the transaction, have employment,
indemnification and severance benefit arrangements, rights to
acceleration of the vesting of stock options and rights to
ongoing indemnification and insurance that provide them with
interests in the transaction that may differ from yours. The
receipt of compensation or other benefits in the transaction may
have influenced these directors in making their recommendation
that you vote in favor of the proposals to be considered at the
special meetings, and these officers in making recommendations
to their boards of directors relating to the transaction. For a
more detailed discussion, see Interests of Certain Persons
in the Transaction.
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT REGARDING
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This document contains certain forward-looking information about
Freeport-McMoRan, Phelps Dodge and the combined company after
completion of the transaction that is intended to be covered by
the safe harbor to forward-looking statements
provided by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. These statements may be made directly in this document or
may be incorporated in this document by reference to other
documents and may include statements for the period following
the completion of this transaction. Representatives of
Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge may also make forward-looking
statements. When used in this document, the words
anticipates, may, can,
plans, feels, believes,
estimates, expects,
projects, intends, likely,
will, should, to be and any
similar expressions and any other statements that are not
historical facts, in each case as they relate to
Freeport-McMoRan or Phelps Dodge, the management of either such
company or the transaction are intended to identify those
assertions as forward-looking statements. In making any of those
statements, the person making them believes that its
expectations are based on reasonable assumptions. However, any
such statement may be influenced by factors that could cause
actual outcomes and results to be materially different from
those projected or anticipated. These forward-looking statements
are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including the
risks described in this document under Risk Factors,
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
expressed in, or implied or projected by, the forward-looking
information and statements.
Some other risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited
to:
|
|
|
|
|
macroeconomic conditions and general industry conditions, such
as the competitive environment of the mining industry;
|
|
|
|
unanticipated mining, milling and other processing problems;
|
|
|
|
accidents that lead to personal injury or property damage;
|
|
|
|
persistent commodity price reductions;
|
|
|
|
changes in political, social or economic circumstances in areas
where Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge operate or plan to
operate;
|
|
|
|
expropriation;
|
|
|
|
variances in ore grades;
|
|
|
|
labor relations;
|
|
|
|
adverse weather conditions and natural disasters, such as
earthquakes;
|
|
|
|
the speculative nature of mineral exploration;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in interest rates and other adverse financial
market conditions;
|
|
|
|
regulatory and litigation matters and risks;
|
|
|
|
changes in tax and other laws;
|
|
|
|
the risk that a condition to closing of the transaction may not
be satisfied;
|
|
|
|
the risk that a regulatory approval that may be required for the
transaction is not obtained or is obtained subject to conditions
that are not anticipated; and
|
|
|
|
other risks to consummation of the transaction.
|
26
The actual results or performance by Freeport-McMoRan or Phelps
Dodge, and issues relating to the transaction, could differ
materially from those expressed in, or implied by, any
forward-looking statements relating to those matters.
Accordingly, no assurances can be given that any of the events
anticipated by the forward-looking statements will transpire or
occur, or if any of them do so, what impact they will have on
the results of operations or financial condition of
Freeport-McMoRan or Phelps Dodge, the combined company or the
transaction. Except as required by law, we are under no
obligation, and expressly disclaim any obligation, to update,
alter or otherwise revise any forward-looking statement, whether
written or oral, that may be made from time to time, whether as
a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
THE
FREEPORT-MCMORAN SPECIAL MEETING
This section contains information from Freeport-McMoRan for
Freeport-McMoRan shareholders about the special meeting of
shareholders it has called to consider and approve amendments to
the Freeport-McMoRan certificate of incorporation and the
issuance of Freeport-McMoRan common stock in connection with the
transaction. Together with this document, Freeport-McMoRan is
also sending you a notice of the Freeport-McMoRan special
meeting and a form of proxy that is being solicited by the
Freeport-McMoRan board of directors for use at the
Freeport-McMoRan special meeting. The information and
instructions contained in this section are addressed to
Freeport-McMoRan shareholders and all references to
you in this section should be understood to be
addressed to Freeport-McMoRan shareholders.
Date,
Time and Place of the Special Meeting
The Freeport-McMoRan special meeting will take place on
March 14, 2007, at 11:00 a.m., Eastern Standard Time,
at Hotel du Pont, 11th and Market Streets, Wilmington, Delaware.
Purpose
of the Special Meeting
The purpose of the Freeport-McMoRan special meeting is to
consider and vote on the following:
1. a proposal to amend the Freeport-McMoRan certificate of
incorporation to increase the authorized number of shares of
Freeport-McMoRan capital stock to 750,000,000, to increase the
authorized number of shares of Class B common stock to
700,000,000 and to rename the Class B common stock (the
only class of common stock currently outstanding) as common
stock and delete the provisions and references to the previously
designated classes and series of Freeport-McMoRan preferred
stock of which no shares are outstanding (other than the
Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock and
51/2% Convertible
Perpetual Preferred Stock);
2. a proposal to issue shares of Freeport-McMoRan common
stock in connection with the transaction;
3. a proposal to approve an adjournment of the special
meeting, if necessary, to permit solicitation of additional
proxies in favor of the above proposals; and
4. any other business as may properly come before the
special meeting.
Record
Date and Outstanding Shares
Freeport-McMoRan has fixed the close of business on
February 12, 2007 as the record date for determining the
Freeport-McMoRan shareholders entitled to receive notice of and
to vote at the Freeport-McMoRan special meeting. As of that
date, there were approximately 197,157,825 shares of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock outstanding. Only holders of
record of Freeport-McMoRan common stock on the record date are
entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the
Freeport-McMoRan special meeting, and any adjournment or
postponement thereof. Each share of common stock is entitled to
one vote.
Quorum
Requirement
Under Delaware law and the Freeport-McMoRan bylaws, the presence
in person or by proxy of a majority of the outstanding shares of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock is necessary to constitute a
quorum at the special meeting. Votes of shareholders of record
who are present at the special meeting in person or by
27
proxy, abstentions and broker non-votes (as defined below) are
counted as present or represented at the special meeting for
purposes of determining whether a quorum exists.
If you hold your shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock through
a broker, bank or other representative, generally the broker or
your representative may only vote the common stock that it holds
for you in accordance with your instructions. However, if it has
not timely received your instructions, the broker or your
representative may vote on certain matters for which it has
discretionary voting authority. If a broker or your
representative cannot vote on a particular matter because it
does not have discretionary voting authority, this is a
broker non-vote on that matter.
Votes
Required
The approval of the proposal to amend the Freeport-McMoRan
certificate of incorporation requires the affirmative vote of
the majority of the outstanding shares of the Freeport-McMoRan
common stock. The approval of the proposal to issue shares of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock in connection with the transaction
requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in
person or by proxy at the Freeport-McMoRan special meeting. With
respect to the proposal to amend the Freeport-McMoRan
certificate of incorporation, a broker non-vote will be counted
toward a quorum at the Freeport-McMoRan special meeting but will
have the same effect as a vote against the proposal. With
respect to the proposal to issue additional shares of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock to Phelps Dodge shareholders in
connection with the transaction, broker non-votes will not be
considered a vote cast for purposes of satisfying
the 50% vote cast requirement and will have the
effect of reducing the aggregate number of shares voting and the
number of affirmative votes required to approve this proposal.
The proposal to approve an adjournment of the Freeport-McMoRan
special meeting to permit solicitation of additional proxies
will be approved if a majority of the outstanding shares of
common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the
Freeport-McMoRan special meeting are voted in favor of the
proposal, whether or not a quorum exists. Your failure to vote
on this proposal, other than by abstention or broker non-vote,
will have the effect of reducing the aggregate number of shares
voting with respect to the proposal, and as a result, the number
of affirmative votes required to approve the proposal. However,
both abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect
as a vote against the adjournment proposal.
Shares Beneficially
Owned as of the Record Date
To our knowledge, no Freeport-McMoRan shareholders have entered
into voting agreements with Phelps Dodge. Based on the number of
shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock outstanding as of
February 12, 2007, the directors and executive officers of
Freeport-McMoRan and their affiliates, as a group, beneficially
owned or had the right to vote approximately 4.2 million
shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock, or less than 1.6% of
the outstanding shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock entitled
to be voted at the special meeting. To Freeport-McMoRans
knowledge, the directors and executive officers of
Freeport-McMoRan and their affiliates intend to vote their
Freeport-McMoRan common stock in favor of the amendment to the
Freeport-McMoRan certificate of incorporation and the issuance
of Freeport-McMoRan common stock in connection with the
transaction.
Voting at
the Freeport-McMoRan Special Meeting
Record holders may vote in person at the Freeport-McMoRan
special meeting or by proxy. Freeport-McMoRan recommends that
record holders vote by proxy even if they plan to attend the
Freeport-McMoRan special meeting. Record holders can always
revoke their proxy and change their votes at the
Freeport-McMoRan special meeting.
Proxies
Voting instructions are attached to your proxy card. If you
properly submit your proxy to Freeport-McMoRan in time to vote,
one of the individuals named as your proxy will vote your shares
as you have directed. You may vote for or against any or all of
the proposals submitted at the Freeport-McMoRan special meeting
or abstain from voting.
28
How to Vote by Proxy. If your shares are
registered in your name, there are three ways to vote your
proxy: by telephone, by Internet or by mail. Your telephone vote
or Internet vote authorizes James R. Moffett, Richard C.
Adkerson or Kathleen L. Quirk, and each of them, as proxies,
each with the power to appoint his or her substitute, to
represent and vote your shares in the same manner as if you
marked, signed and returned your proxy form by mail.
|
|
|
|
|
Vote by Telephone Toll-Free
1-800-732-4052
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use any touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy 24 hours a
day, seven days a week until 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Standard
Time) on March 13, 2007.
|
|
|
|
Please have your proxy card available and follow the simple
instructions the voice prompt provides.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vote by Internet http://proxy.georgeson.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use the Internet to vote your proxy 24 hours a day, seven
days a week until 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Standard Time) on
March 13, 2007.
|
|
|
|
Please have your proxy card available and follow the simple
instructions to obtain your records and create an electronic
ballot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the
postage-paid envelope provided; or
|
|
|
|
Return it to Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc.,
c/o Secretary, P.O. Box 17149, Wilmington, Delaware
19885-9808.
|
Only the latest dated proxy received from you, whether by mail,
telephone or internet, will be voted at the Freeport-McMoRan
special meeting. If you vote by telephone or Internet, please do
not mail your proxy form.
If your shares are held in street name (through a
broker, bank or other nominee), you may receive a separate
voting instruction form, or you may need to contact your broker,
bank or other nominee to determine whether you will be able to
vote electronically using the telephone or Internet.
How Proxies Will Be Voted. If you sign and
submit a proxy but do not mark a box with respect to one or more
of the Freeport-McMoRan proposals, your proxies will follow the
Freeport-McMoRan board of directors recommendations and
vote these shares:
|
|
|
|
|
FOR the amendment to the Freeport-McMoRan certificate of
incorporation, which includes increasing the authorized number
of shares of Freeport-McMoRan capital stock to 750,000,000 and
increasing the authorized number of shares of common stock to
700,000,000 shares;
|
|
|
|
FOR approval of the proposal to issue shares of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock in connection with the
transaction; and
|
|
|
|
FOR the adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary,
to permit solicitation of additional proxies in favor of the
above proposals.
|
Shares represented by a proxy that have been returned with
instructions to vote against the proposal to amend the
Freeport-McMoRan certificate of incorporation to increase the
amount of authorized shares of common stock and issue shares of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock in connection with the transaction
but which does not include instructions with respect to the
adjournment proposal will not be voted in favor of the
adjournment proposal.
Revoking Your Proxy. You may revoke your proxy
before it is voted by:
|
|
|
|
|
submitting a new proxy card bearing a later date, or submitting
a new proxy by telephone or through the Internet;
|
|
|
|
providing a written notice revoking your proxy to
Freeport-McMoRans corporate secretary before the
Freeport-McMoRan special meeting; or
|
|
|
|
attending the special meeting and voting in person.
|
29
If you have instructed your broker to vote your shares, you must
follow directions you receive from your broker in order to
change or revoke your vote.
Solicitation
of Proxies
Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge will each pay their own
expenses incurred in connection with the printing and mailing of
this document. Freeport-McMoRan has retained Georgeson Inc. for
a fee of $25,000, plus certain expenses, to assist in the
solicitation of proxies and otherwise in connection with the
Freeport-McMoRan special meeting. Freeport-McMoRan and its proxy
solicitor will also request banks, brokers and other
intermediaries holding shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock
beneficially owned by others to send this document to, and
obtain proxies from, the beneficial owners and will reimburse
holders for their reasonable expenses in so doing. Solicitation
of proxies by mail may be supplemented by telephone, email and
other electronic means, advertisements and personal solicitation
by the directors, officers and employees of Freeport-McMoRan. No
additional compensation will be paid to directors, officers or
employees for such solicitation efforts.
The extent to which these proxy soliciting efforts will be
necessary depends largely upon how promptly proxies are
submitted. Please send in your proxy by mail, telephone or
Internet without delay.
No Other
Business; Adjournments
Under the Freeport-McMoRan bylaws, the business to be conducted
at the Freeport-McMoRan special meeting will be limited to the
purposes stated in the notice to Freeport-McMoRan shareholders
provided with this document.
Adjournments may be made for the purpose of, among other things,
soliciting additional proxies. Any adjournment may be made from
time to time with the approval of a majority of the votes
present in person or by proxy at the time of the vote, whether
or not a quorum exists. Under Delaware law, Freeport-McMoRan is
not required to notify shareholders of any adjournment of less
than 30 days if the time and place of the adjourned meeting
are announced at the meeting at which adjournment is taken,
unless after the adjournment a new record date is fixed for the
adjourned meeting.
References to the Freeport-McMoRan special meeting in this
document are to such special meeting as adjourned or postponed.
Communications
by Freeport-McMoRan Shareholders with Freeport-McMoRan
Any written revocation of a proxy or other communications in
connection with this document and requests for additional copies
of this document or the proxy card should be addressed to
Georgeson Inc. If you have any questions or need further
assistance in voting your shares, please call Georgeson Inc.
toll-free at
(866) 767-8979.
THE
PHELPS DODGE SPECIAL MEETING
This section contains information from Phelps Dodge for Phelps
Dodge shareholders about the special meeting of shareholders it
has called to adopt the merger agreement and approve the
transaction. Together with this document, Phelps Dodge is also
sending you a notice of the Phelps Dodge special meeting and a
form of proxy that is being solicited by the Phelps Dodge board
of directors for use at the Phelps Dodge special meeting. The
information and instructions contained in this section are
addressed to Phelps Dodge shareholders and all references to
you in this section should be understood to be
addressed to Phelps Dodge shareholders.
Date,
Time and Place of the Special Meeting
This document is being furnished by the Phelps Dodge board of
directors in connection with the solicitation of proxies from
holders of Phelps Dodge common shares for use at Phelps
Dodges special meeting of shareholders to be held at The
Heard Museum, 2301 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona on
March 14, 2007, beginning at 10:00 a.m., Mountain
Standard Time, and at any adjournment or postponement of the
meeting.
30
Purpose
of the Special Meeting
The Phelps Dodge special meeting will be held to consider and
vote upon:
1. a proposal to approve and adopt the merger agreement;
2. a proposal to approve an adjournment of the special
meeting, if necessary, to permit solicitation of additional
proxies in favor of the above proposal; and
3. any other business that may properly come before the
special meeting or any adjournments or postponements of the
special meeting.
Record
Date and Outstanding Shares
The Phelps Dodge board of directors has fixed the close of
business on February 12, 2007, as the record date. Only
holders of record of Phelps Dodge common shares on the books of
Phelps Dodge as of the close of business on the record
date will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the special
meeting and any postponements or adjournments of the special
meeting. As of that date, there were approximately
204,118,665 Phelps Dodge common shares issued and
outstanding held by approximately 15,500 holders of record.
The number of record holders does not include persons whose
stock is held in nominee or street name accounts
through brokers.
Quorum
and Requirement
Under the Phelps Dodge bylaws, a majority of all Phelps Dodge
common shares outstanding on the record date, represented in
person or by proxy, constitutes a quorum for the transaction of
business at the special meeting. Votes of shareholders of record
who are present at the special meeting in person or by proxy,
abstentions and broker non-votes (as defined below) are counted
as present or represented at the special meeting for purposes of
determining whether a quorum exists.
If a quorum is not obtained, or if fewer Phelps Dodge common
shares are voted in favor of the proposal for the approval and
adoption of the merger agreement at the special meeting than the
number of shares necessary to approve the proposal, Phelps Dodge
may seek to adjourn the special meeting to allow additional time
for obtaining additional proxies or votes. At any subsequent
reconvening of the special meeting, all proxies will be voted in
the same manner as those proxies would have been voted at the
original convening of the special meeting, except for any
proxies that have been effectively revoked or withdrawn before
the reconvened special meeting.
References to the Phelps Dodge special meeting in this document
are to that special meeting as adjourned or postponed.
Votes
Required
Each holder of Phelps Dodge common shares will be entitled to
one vote, in person or by proxy, for each Phelps Dodge common
share registered in the holders name on the books of
Phelps Dodge as of the record date on any matter submitted for
the vote of Phelps Dodge shareholders. The proposal for the
approval and adoption of the merger agreement will be approved
if
662/3%
of the outstanding Phelps Dodge common shares entitled to vote
at the special meeting are voted in favor of the proposal. If
the proposal to approve an adjournment of the special meeting to
permit the solicitation of additional proxies is presented for a
vote, it will be approved, whether or not there is a quorum, if
a majority of the Phelps Dodge common shares present in person
or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Phelps Dodge
special meeting are voted in favor of the adjournment proposal.
With respect to both the proposal to approve and adopt the
merger agreement and the proposal to approve an adjournment of
the special meeting to permit the solicitation of additional
proxies, abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same
effect as a vote against the proposal. If a Phelps Dodge
shareholder fails to vote on the adjournment proposal, other
than by abstention or broker non-vote, this will reduce the
total number of shares voting with respect to the proposal and,
as a result, the number of affirmative votes required to approve
the proposal.
A broker non-vote may occur on a proposal when a
broker is not permitted to vote on that proposal without
instruction from the beneficial owner of the shares and no
instruction is given by the beneficial owner.
31
A broker is not permitted to vote on the proposal to approve and
adopt the merger agreement or on the proposal to approve an
adjournment of the special meeting without instruction from the
beneficial owner of the Phelps Dodge shares held by the broker.
Shares Beneficially
Owned as of the Record Date
To our knowledge, no Phelps Dodge shareholders have entered into
voting agreements with Freeport-McMoRan. Based on the number of
Phelps Dodge common shares outstanding as of February 12,
2007, the directors and executive officers of Phelps Dodge and
their affiliates, as a group, beneficially owned or had the
right to vote approximately 884,391 Phelps Dodge common
shares, or less than 1% of the outstanding Phelps Dodge common
shares entitled to be voted at the special meeting. To Phelps
Dodges knowledge, the directors and executive officers of
Phelps Dodge and their affiliates intend to vote their Phelps
Dodge common shares in favor of the approval and adoption of the
merger agreement.
Voting at
the Phelps Dodge Special Meeting
If you are a Phelps Dodge shareholder of record on the record
date and you attend the special meeting, you may vote in person
by completing a ballot at the special meeting even if you
already have signed, dated and returned a proxy card. If your
shares are held in the name of a broker or nominee, you may not
vote your shares in person at the special meeting unless you
obtain a signed proxy from the record holder giving you the
right to vote the shares.
Proxies
Voting instructions are attached to your proxy card. If you
properly submit your proxy to Phelps Dodge in time to vote, one
of the individuals named as your proxy will vote your shares as
you have directed. You may vote for or against any or all of the
proposals submitted at the Phelps Dodge special meeting or
abstain from voting.
How to Vote by Proxy. If your shares are
registered in your name, there are three ways to vote your
proxy: by telephone, by Internet or by mail. Your telephone vote
or Internet vote authorizes Timothy R. Snider, Ramiro G. Peru
and S. David Colton, and each of them, as proxies, each with the
power to appoint his substitute, to represent and vote your
shares in the same manner as if you marked, signed and returned
your proxy form by mail.
|
|
|
|
|
Vote by Telephone Toll-Free (888)
693-8683
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use any touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy 24 hours a
day, seven days a week until 4:00 a.m. (Mountain Standard
Time) on March 14, 2007.
|
|
|
|
Please have your proxy card available and follow the simple
instructions the voice prompt provides.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vote by Internet http://www.cesvote.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use the Internet to vote your proxy 24 hours a day, seven
days a week until 4:00 a.m. (Mountain Standard Time) on
March 14, 2007.
|
|
|
|
Please have your proxy card available and follow the simple
instructions to obtain your records and create an electronic
ballot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the
postage-paid envelope provided; or
|
|
|
|
Return it to Phelps Dodge Corporation, c/o Corporate
Election Services, P.O. Box 1150, Pittsburgh, PA
15230-1150.
|
Only the latest dated proxy received from you, whether by mail,
telephone or Internet, will be voted at the Phelps Dodge
Corporation special meeting. If you vote by telephone or
Internet, please do not mail your proxy form.
If your shares are held in street name (through a
broker, bank or other nominee), you may receive a separate
voting instruction form with voting instructions, or you may
need to contact your broker, bank or other nominee to determine
whether you will be able to vote electronically using the
telephone or Internet.
32
A Phelps Dodge shareholder whose shares are held in the name of
a broker or nominee should follow the instructions provided by
that broker or nominee on how to direct the voting of the
shareholders shares.
How Proxies will be Voted. All Phelps Dodge
common shares represented by proxies properly executed and
received by Phelps Dodge before or at Phelps Dodges
special meeting will be voted in accordance with the
instructions indicated on the proxies. If the proxy is properly
completed, signed and returned but no instructions are
indicated, the shares will be voted:
|
|
|
|
|
FOR the approval and adoption of the merger
agreement; and
|
|
|
|
FOR the approval of an adjournment of the special
meeting, if necessary, to permit the solicitation of additional
proxies in favor of the above proposal.
|
Phelps Dodge shares represented by a proxy that has been
returned with instructions to vote against the proposal to
approve and adopt the merger agreement but which does not
include instructions with respect to the adjournment proposal
will not be voted in favor of the adjournment proposal.
Revoking Your Proxy. You may revoke your proxy
before it is voted by:
|
|
|
|
|
submitting a new proxy card bearing a later date, or submitting
a new proxy by telephone or through the Internet;
|
|
|
|
providing a written notice revoking your proxy to the Assistant
General Counsel and Secretary of Phelps Dodge before the special
meeting; or
|
|
|
|
attending the special meeting and voting in person.
|
If you have instructed your broker to vote your shares, you must
follow directions you receive from your broker in order to
change or revoke your vote.
Solicitation
of Proxies
Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge will each pay their own
expenses incurred in connection with the printing and mailing of
this document. Phelps Dodge has retained D.F. King &
Co., Inc. for a fee estimated to be $300,000, plus certain
expenses, including out-of-pocket expenses, to assist in the
solicitation of proxies and otherwise in connection with the
Phelps Dodge special meeting. Phelps Dodge and its proxy
solicitor will also request banks, brokers and other
intermediaries holding Phelps Dodge common shares beneficially
owned by others to send this document to, and obtain proxies
from, the beneficial owners and will reimburse holders for their
reasonable expenses in so doing. Solicitation of proxies by mail
may be supplemented by telephone, email and other electronic
means, advertisements and personal solicitation by the
directors, officers and employees of Phelps Dodge. No additional
compensation will be paid to directors, officers or employees
for such solicitation efforts.
Other
Business
The Phelps Dodge board of directors currently is not aware of
any business to be acted upon at the special meeting other than
as described in this document. If, however, other matters are
properly brought before the special meeting or any adjournments
or postponements of the meeting, in the absence of instructions
to the contrary, persons appointed as proxies will have
discretion to vote or act on those matters in their best
judgment.
Communications
by Phelps Dodge Shareholders with Phelps Dodge
Any written revocation of a proxy or other communications in
connection with this document and requests for additional copies
of this document or the proxy card should be addressed to D.F.
King & Co., Inc. If you have any questions or need
further assistance in voting your shares, please call D.F.
King & Co., Inc. toll-free at
(800) 769-4414
or collect at
(212) 269-5550.
Non-U.S. holders
may call D.F. King & Co. at +44 20 7920 9700.
33
INFORMATION
ABOUT THE COMPANIES
Freeport-McMoRan
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc.
1615 Poydras Street
New Orleans, Louisiana 70112
Telephone:
(504) 582-4000
http://www.fcx.com
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. is one of the
worlds largest producers of copper and gold.
Freeport-McMoRans operations are conducted through its
principal operating subsidiaries, PT Freeport Indonesia, PT Irja
Eastern Minerals and Atlantic Copper, S.A.
PT Freeport Indonesias operations in Papua, Indonesia,
involve mineral exploration and development, mining and milling
of ore containing copper, gold and silver and the worldwide
marketing of concentrates containing those metals. PT Freeport
Indonesia is also a 25% owner of PT Smelting, which operates a
copper smelter and refinery in Gresik, Indonesia.
PT Irja Eastern Minerals conducts mineral exploration activities
(currently suspended) on land adjacent to that held by PT
Freeport Indonesia. Freeport-McMoRan also conducts mineral
exploration activities (currently suspended) in Papua pursuant
to a joint venture through PT Nabire Bakti Mining. All these
companies operate through Contracts of Work with the Government
of Indonesia which, at the end of 2005, covered approximately
2.2 million acres. Atlantic Copper operates a copper
smelter and refinery in Huelva, Spain.
Phelps
Dodge
Phelps Dodge Corporation
One North Central Avenue
Phoenix, AZ
85004-4414
Telephone:
(602) 366-8100
http://www.phelpsdodge.com
Phelps Dodge is one of the worlds leading producers of
copper. Phelps Dodge is a world leader in the production of
molybdenum, and the largest producer of molybdenum-based
chemicals and continuous-cast copper rod. Phelps Dodge employs
15,000 people worldwide, primarily through its two divisions,
Phelps Dodge Mining Company, which is referred to in this
document as PDMC, and Phelps Dodge Industries, which is referred
to in this document as PDI.
PDMC is an industry leader in the safe, efficient and
environmentally responsible production of high-quality metals
and minerals. PDMC is a fully integrated producer of copper and
molybdenum, with mines and processing facilities in North and
South America and Europe, and processing capabilities for other
minerals as by-products, such as gold, silver and rhenium.
Phelps Dodge Exploration Corp., a subsidiary of Phelps Dodge,
and the Process Technology Center, a division of PDMC, focus on
continued discovery and development of economically viable
mineral reserves and the refinement and creation of production
and process technologies.
PDI consists of Phelps Dodge Wire and Cable, which manufactures
engineered products principally for the global energy sector.
Phelps Dodge Wire and Cable manufactures products for power
distribution, heavy industry, and medical and electronic devices
and products, with operations in the United States, Latin
America, Asia and Africa.
REGULATORY
AND OTHER APPROVALS REQUIRED FOR THE TRANSACTION
HSR Act. As a condition to the transaction,
the HSR Act requires Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge to
observe the HSR Acts notification and waiting period. The
HSR Act provides for an initial 30-calendar-day waiting period
following the necessary filings by the parties to the merger. If
the 30th calendar day of the initial waiting period is not
a business day, the initial waiting period is extended until
11:59 p.m. of the next business day. Each of
Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge filed a notification and
report form for the transaction with the FTC and the Antitrust
Division on December 4, 2006. Early termination of the
waiting
34
period was granted on December 22, 2006. Thus, as far as
the HSR Act is concerned, the parties are free to consummate the
transaction.
European Union. Both Freeport-McMoRan and
Phelps Dodge sell products to customers based in the European
Union. The EC Merger Regulation (Regulation 139 of
2004) requires notification of and approval by the European
Commission of mergers or acquisitions involving parties with
worldwide sales and European Union sales exceeding given
thresholds. Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge filed a formal
notification of the merger with the European Commission on
January 16, 2007. The European Commission will have until
February 20, 2007, which is 25 business days after
receipt of such formal notification, to issue its decision
regarding the merger. This
25-business
day period is extendable for an additional ten-business day
period in certain circumstances. After that period, if the
European Commission has serious doubts as to the
compatibility of the merger with the common market, it will
enter into a Phase II investigation. The
standard timetable for a Phase II investigation
is 90 working days. This timetable may be extended in certain
circumstances by either the parties or the European Commission.
There are also procedures for the European Commission to
Stop the Clock if the parties have not supplied
information required by the European Commission.
Other Filings. Other than the merger filings
described above, notifications of the transaction have been
filed in the following jurisdictions: Brazil, Bulgaria, China,
South Korea and Mexico. We will endeavor to obtain required
merger control clearances with the relevant competition
authorities in these, and any other required jurisdictions, as
soon as practicable.
General. The FTC, the Antitrust Division or
any other regulatory authority could take action under the
applicable antitrust laws with respect to the transaction,
including seeking to enjoin the completion of the transaction or
seeking the divestiture by either party of shares or assets, or
seeking to subject Freeport-McMoRan or Phelps Dodge to operating
conditions, before or after we complete the transaction. We
cannot assure you that an antitrust challenge to the transaction
will not be made and, if such a challenge is made, we cannot
predict the result. We have agreed to use our reasonable best
efforts to obtain and maintain from governmental entities and
any necessary third party any approvals, consents,
registrations, permits, authorizations and other confirmations
required in connection with the transaction and to make all
necessary filings, notices, petitions, statements,
registrations, submissions of information, applications and
other documents necessary under applicable law with respect to
the transaction.
THE
TRANSACTION
The following discussion contains material information
pertaining to the transaction. This discussion is subject and
qualified in its entirety by reference to the merger agreement
attached as Appendix A to this document. We urge you to
read and review the entire merger agreement as well as the
discussion in this document.
General
This section provides material information about the transaction
involving Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge and the
circumstances surrounding the transaction. You can find a more
detailed description of the terms of the merger agreement,
including information about the conditions to completion of the
transaction and the provisions for terminating the merger
agreement, below under The Merger Agreement.
We are furnishing this document to Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps
Dodge shareholders in connection with the solicitation of
proxies by the board of directors of each of Freeport-McMoRan
and Phelps Dodge for use at their respective special meetings of
shareholders and any adjournment or postponement of the meetings.
|
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan Proposals. At the
Freeport-McMoRan special meeting, holders of Freeport-McMoRan
common stock will be asked to vote upon a proposal to amend the
Freeport-McMoRan certificate of incorporation, which includes
increasing the amount of authorized common stock; a proposal to
issue shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock in connection with
the transaction and, if necessary, a proposal to approve an
adjournment of the special meeting to permit solicitation of
additional proxies in favor of the previous proposals.
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge Proposals. At the Phelps Dodge
special meeting, holders of Phelps Dodge common shares will be
asked to vote upon a proposal to approve and adopt the merger
agreement and, if necessary, a proposal to approve an
adjournment of the special meeting to permit solicitation of
additional proxies in favor of the previous proposal.
|
Approval by Freeport-McMoRan shareholders of the proposal to
amend the Freeport-McMoRan certificate of incorporation and the
proposal to issue Freeport-McMoRan common stock in connection
with the transaction, and approval by Phelps Dodge shareholders
of the proposal to approve and adopt the merger agreement, are
each conditions to the completion of the transaction.
Structure
of the Transaction
Under the terms of the proposed merger, Panther Acquisition
Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Freeport-McMoRan, will
merge into Phelps Dodge. As a result, Phelps Dodge will continue
as a surviving corporation and will become a wholly owned
subsidiary of Freeport-McMoRan. Accordingly, Phelps Dodge shares
will no longer be publicly traded after the completion of the
transaction.
At the completion of the merger, sometimes referred to in this
document as the effective time, each issued and outstanding
Phelps Dodge common share will be converted into the right to
receive a combination of 0.67 of a share of Freeport-McMoRan
common stock and $88.00 in cash, without interest. Phelps Dodge
shareholders will receive cash in lieu of any fractional shares
of Freeport-McMoRan common stock that would have otherwise been
issued at the completion of the transaction. The 0.67 of a share
of Freeport-McMoRan common stock that will be issued for each
Phelps Dodge common share is sometimes referred to in this
document as the exchange ratio, the $88.00 in cash, without
interest, that will be issued for each Phelps Dodge common share
is sometimes referred to in this document as the cash
consideration, and the exchange ratio and the cash consideration
are together sometimes referred to in this document as the
merger consideration.
If, during the period between the date of the merger agreement
and the effective time of the merger, any change in the
outstanding shares of capital stock of Phelps Dodge or
Freeport-McMoRan occurs, including by reason of any
reclassification, recapitalization, stock split or combination,
exchange or readjustment of shares, or any stock dividend
thereon with a record date during such period (not including any
change that results from any exercise of options outstanding as
of the date of the merger agreement to purchase Phelps Dodge
common shares under Phelps Dodges stock option or
compensation plans or arrangements), the exchange ratio and the
cash consideration will be adjusted accordingly to provide to
the holders of Phelps Dodge common shares the same economic
effect as contemplated by the merger agreement prior to such
event.
We expect that, upon completion of the transaction, the
Freeport-McMoRan shareholders immediately prior to the
transaction will own approximately 59% of the outstanding common
stock of the combined company immediately after the transaction
(62% on a fully diluted basis), and the Phelps Dodge
shareholders immediately prior to the transaction will own
approximately 41% of the outstanding common stock of the
combined company immediately after the transaction (38% on a
fully diluted basis). These figures are calculated assuming the
number of shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock outstanding as
of September 30, 2006, and the number of Phelps Dodge
common shares, restricted stock and stock options outstanding as
of September 30, 2006 and assuming that all of the Phelps
Dodge stock options are exercised prior to the completion of the
transaction.
The corporate headquarters of the combined company will be
located in Phoenix, Arizona and Freeport-McMoRan will maintain
its New Orleans, Louisiana office to service the accounting and
administrative needs of its Indonesian operations.
Background
of the Transaction
Each of the managements of Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge
separately have periodically evaluated the opportunity to
achieve their respective companies long-term strategic
goals and objectives and to enhance shareholder value with a
strategic transaction. Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge have
been familiar with each others businesses for many years.
Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge each regularly reviews the
possibility of selected strategic acquisitions, divestitures and
business combinations with others.
36
In 1996, Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge entered into a
confidentiality and standstill agreement and discussed a
potential business combination. No agreement was reached and
those discussions terminated. Since that time, representatives
of senior management of Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge have
from time to time discussed the strategic benefits of a business
combination between Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge.
In June 2006, Phelps Dodge entered into a combination agreement
with Inco Limited pursuant to which Phelps Dodge agreed to
acquire Inco.
In July 2006, representatives of JPMorgan and representatives of
Merrill Lynch separately met with Mr. Richard C. Adkerson,
president and chief executive officer of Freeport-McMoRan and
Ms. Kathleen L. Quirk, senior vice president, chief
financial officer and treasurer of Freeport-McMoRan, to suggest
that Freeport-McMoRan consider a potential acquisition of Phelps
Dodge.
On August 1, 2006, at a meeting of the board of directors
of Freeport-McMoRan, Mr. Adkerson reported on the recent
merger and acquisition activity in the mining industry and
reported that Freeport-McMoRan had been contacted separately by
JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch regarding a potential acquisition of
Phelps Dodge. Mr. Adkerson reported that management would
gather pertinent information and continue its analysis of such
an acquisition.
In August 2006, Mr. Adkerson telephoned Mr. J. Steven
Whisler, chairman and chief executive officer of Phelps Dodge.
Mr. Adkerson and Mr. Whisler had a general discussion
about the consolidation occurring in the mining industry.
Mr. Adkerson commented on the attractiveness of combining
the assets of Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan, consistent with
previous discussions between him and Mr. Whisler, while
recognizing that Phelps Dodge had entered into a definitive
agreement to acquire Inco. Mr. Whisler informed
Mr. Adkerson that Phelps Dodge was focused on the
combination agreement with Inco. That agreement was subsequently
terminated on September 5, 2006.
In mid-September 2006, representatives of Merrill Lynch informed
representatives of Citigroup, a financial advisor to Phelps
Dodge, that Merrill Lynch and JPMorgan were discussing with
senior management of Freeport-McMoRan various structures for
Freeport-McMoRan to acquire Phelps Dodge.
On September 20, 2006, Mr. Adkerson and Ms. Quirk
met with representatives of JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch to
discuss possible acquisition structures, valuations and
financing alternatives.
On September 28, 2006, the Freeport-McMoRan board of
directors held a special meeting to discuss with senior
management the potential acquisition of Phelps Dodge, including
the benefits and risks associated with the combination of their
businesses. Freeport-McMoRans senior management suggested
preliminarily a structure that, subject to due diligence, would
include (1) a control premium being paid to Phelps Dodge
shareholders, (2) up to 33% of the consideration being paid
in cash and the remainder in Freeport-McMoRan common stock and
(3) Freeport-McMoRan directors constituting a majority of
the board of directors of the combined company and
Mr. Adkerson retaining the chief executive officer
position. At this meeting, the board of directors authorized
Mr. Adkerson to proceed with discussions about a possible
acquisition of Phelps Dodge on that basis.
After Freeport-McMoRans board meeting, Mr. Adkerson
telephoned Mr. Whisler and indicated that Freeport-McMoRan
was prepared, subject to due diligence, to acquire Phelps Dodge
for a combination of cash and Freeport-McMoRan common stock in a
transaction in which Phelps Dodge shareholders would receive a
control premium. Mr. Adkerson said that Freeport-McMoRan
would be willing to pay between 25% and 33% of the consideration
offered to Phelps Dodge shareholders in cash. Mr. Adkerson
also proposed that he would continue as the chief executive
officer of the combined company, and that the current
Freeport-McMoRan directors would comprise the majority of the
board of directors of the combined company.
On October 3 and 4, 2006, in connection with a
regularly scheduled board meeting, the Phelps Dodge board of
directors discussed with management and Phelps Dodges
financial and legal advisors the possibility of a transaction
involving Freeport-McMoRan as well as potential alternative
transactions. At this meeting, the board of directors directed
Mr. Whisler to advise Freeport-McMoRan that a more detailed
proposal would be required for the Phelps Dodge board of
directors to give the matter in-depth consideration.
37
On October 5, 2006, Mr. Whisler telephoned
Mr. Adkerson to advise him of the views of the Phelps Dodge
board of directors. Mr. Whisler specified that any further
proposal from Freeport-McMoRan must be specific as to the size
of the premium and the percentage of cash and stock that would
be offered to Phelps Dodge shareholders, and he emphasized to
Mr. Adkerson that these were the two central issues.
Mr. Whisler also said the Phelps Dodge board of directors
had indicated a preference for the cash component to be
substantially larger than the amount that Mr. Adkerson
previously proposed.
On October 6, 2006, Mr. Adkerson telephoned
Mr. Whisler and told him that, subject to due diligence,
Freeport-McMoRan was prepared to offer to acquire Phelps Dodge
at a price that represented a premium of between
20-25% and a
mix of consideration that included up to 50% in cash. In a
further telephone call later that same day, Mr. Whisler
told Mr. Adkerson that Mr. Whisler believed the Phelps
Dodge board of directors would be unlikely to find such an offer
attractive and suggested that Mr. Adkerson consider
improving Freeport-McMoRans offer before it was presented
to the Phelps Dodge board of directors.
On October 10, 2006, while in London in connection with an
industry conference Mr. Adkerson and Mr. Whisler met
to discuss Freeport-McMoRans proposal.
On October 11, 2006, Mr. Adkerson telephoned
Mr. Whisler to inform him that Freeport-McMoRan, subject to
due diligence, would be willing to pay a premium of 30% to
Phelps Dodge shareholders in a combination of the two companies.
The Phelps Dodge board of directors met on October 16,
2006. At this meeting, Mr. Whisler briefed the board of
directors on his discussions with Mr. Adkerson.
Representatives of Citigroup and Morgan Stanley discussed with
the Phelps Dodge board of directors their preliminary
perspectives on Freeport-McMoRans revised proposal. After
consideration of these matters, the board of directors
authorized Mr. Whisler to continue his discussions with
Mr. Adkerson concerning a possible transaction in order to
further clarify the terms of Freeport-McMoRans proposal.
Mr. Whisler telephoned Mr. Adkerson on
October 17, 2006, and explained that the Phelps Dodge board
of directors was open to considering a possible transaction with
Freeport-McMoRan, but would need to understand better the terms
of Freeport-McMoRans proposal, including the calculation
of the 30% premium, the percentage of cash and stock
consideration and other issues, before deciding whether to move
forward. With respect to the percentage of cash and stock
consideration, Mr. Whisler indicated that the Phelps Dodge
board of directors would consider supporting the transaction
only if the cash portion of the consideration was materially
greater than the 50% level previously suggested by
Mr. Adkerson.
On October 23, 2006, Mr. Adkerson sent to
Mr. Whisler a letter and preliminary, non-binding term
sheet setting forth the terms on which Freeport-McMoRan would be
willing to acquire Phelps Dodge. The term sheet proposed that
Freeport-McMoRan would acquire Phelps Dodge for a price per
share of $86 in cash and 0.50 shares of Freeport-McMoRan
common stock. Based on the closing prices of Freeport-McMoRan
and Phelps Dodge shares on October 20, 2006, this offer
implied a total price of $114.25 per Phelps Dodge share,
representing a premium of approximately 16% based on Phelps
Dodges closing share price on October 20, 2006, 27%
based on the average closing share price over the
20-day
period ending on October 20, 2006, and 30% based on the
closing share price on October 10, 2006, the date of the
meeting between Mr. Whisler and Mr. Adkerson in
London. The term sheet specified that the exchange ratio for the
stock portion of the consideration would be fixed and would not
be adjusted for movements in the price of shares of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock.
The term sheet further proposed that, following the transaction,
three independent members of the Phelps Dodge board of directors
would be added to the Freeport-McMoRan board of directors, that
Freeport-McMoRans chief executive officer would continue
to serve as the chief executive officer of the combined company,
and that Freeport-McMoRan would offer senior management roles to
certain of Phelps Dodges executive officers other than
Mr. Whisler. Freeport-McMoRans term sheet stated that
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. would remain the
name of the parent company and the Phelps Dodge name would be
retained at the operating company level. The term sheet also
provided that the combined company would maintain a major
presence at Phelps Dodges Phoenix headquarters, with a
presumption, subject to further analysis, that the headquarters
would be located there.
38
After receipt of Freeport-McMoRans term sheet on
October 23, 2006, Mr. Whisler telephoned
Mr. Adkerson to discuss several elements of
Freeport-McMoRans proposal. In that discussion,
Mr. Whisler advised Mr. Adkerson that he did not
expect the Phelps Dodge board of directors would consider the
premium presented in the term sheet to be sufficient.
The Phelps Dodge board of directors met on October 28,
2006, to consider the Freeport-McMoRan proposal and related
matters. At this meeting, Phelps Dodges financial advisors
provided the board of directors with their perspective on the
proposals in Freeport-McMoRans term sheet and presented a
preliminary valuation analysis of Phelps Dodge, and members of
Phelps Dodges senior management team also discussed their
perspective on Freeport-McMoRans proposals as well as
their views on the copper market. At the meeting, the board of
directors instructed Phelps Dodge senior management to advise
Freeport-McMoRan that the value offered to Phelps Dodge
shareholders was insufficient, but authorized management to
continue discussions with Freeport-McMoRan.
Following the board meeting, Mr. Whisler telephoned
Mr. Adkerson and explained that as a result of the rise in
Phelps Dodges share price, Freeport-McMoRans offer
no longer represented a 30% premium. Mr. Whisler stated
that the Phelps Dodge board of directors viewed the offer as
providing insufficient value to Phelps Dodge shareholders.
On October 31, 2006, in connection with a regularly
scheduled board meeting, the Freeport-McMoRan board of directors
discussed with management the status of the discussions with
Phelps Dodge. Mr. Adkerson reported that management had
been working with JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch on various
alternatives with respect to a proposal to acquire Phelps Dodge.
Mr. Adkerson reviewed the potential accretion to cash flows
and earnings under different scenarios and also reported on the
availability of financing for the cash portion that would be
paid to Phelps Dodge shareholders. During the meeting,
Mr. Adkerson noted that any proposal to Phelps Dodge would
be subject to due diligence. At this meeting, the board of
directors authorized Mr. Adkerson to meet with
Mr. Whisler to discuss Freeport-McMoRans proposed
acquisition of Phelps Dodge based on a 30% control premium.
On the morning of November 2, 2006, Mr. Adkerson met
with Mr. Whisler in Scottsdale, Arizona. At the meeting,
Mr. Adkerson stated that, subject to due diligence,
Freeport-McMoRan was willing to increase its offer to $86.00
cash and 0.65 shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock for
each Phelps Dodge common share. After further negotiation
between Mr. Adkerson and Mr. Whisler,
Mr. Adkerson expressed a willingness to consider improving
the terms to $88.00 cash and 0.65 shares of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock for each Phelps Dodge common
share. Mr. Adkerson and Mr. Whisler also discussed
other matters related to the transaction, including the
headquarters location and the advisability that certain members
of Phelps Dodges senior management, other than
Mr. Whisler, be retained.
The Phelps Dodge board of directors met on November 2,
2006, following the meeting between Mr. Whisler and
Mr. Adkerson. Mr. Whisler briefed the board of
directors on his discussions with Mr. Adkerson, and Phelps
Dodges financial advisors presented their analysis of
Freeport-McMoRans offer. After discussion, the Phelps
Dodge board of directors authorized Mr. Whisler to try to
reach an agreement with Mr. Adkerson on the basis of $90.00
cash and 0.7 shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock for
each Phelps Dodge common share.
On November 3, 2006, Mr. Whisler telephoned
Mr. Adkerson and informed him of the position of the Phelps
Dodge board. Mr. Adkerson indicated he needed to review the
request with his advisors. Mr. Adkerson telephoned
Mr. Whisler later that day and stated that Freeport-McMoRan
was prepared, subject to due diligence, to offer $88.00 in cash
and 0.67 shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock for each
Phelps Dodge common share.
On November 6, 2006, the Phelps Dodge board of directors
held a meeting to discuss Freeport-McMoRans most recent
proposal. After discussion, the board of directors authorized
Mr. Whisler to enter into a confidentiality and standstill
agreement with Freeport-McMoRan and to proceed with due
diligence. Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge executed a
confidentiality and standstill agreement on November 6,
2006.
39
From November 6 through November 18, 2006, the date that
definitive documents were signed, Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps
Dodge and their respective advisors continued to conduct
reciprocal due diligence and negotiated the terms of the merger
agreement. Freeport-McMoRan also negotiated the terms of its
financing commitment.
On November 7, 2006, representatives of Freeport-McMoRan
and Phelps Dodge, with their respective legal advisors, spoke by
telephone regarding the structure of the transaction, the
documentation required, the diligence process, possible
regulatory filings and preparation of a joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
On November 9 and 10, 2006, representatives of Phelps Dodge
and Freeport-McMoRan, together with their respective legal and
financial advisors, met in Dallas, Texas. Members of the senior
management of Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan gave
presentations about the business, operations and financial
projections of Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan, respectively.
On November 10, 2006, the Phelps Dodge board of directors
met with two directors of Freeport-McMoRan to discuss the role
of the Freeport-McMoRan board of directors, various governance
matters, the risks of operating in Indonesia,
Freeport-McMoRans environmental and human rights practices
and other aspects of Freeport-McMoRans business and
operations.
On November 13, 2006, Mr. Adkerson telephoned
Mr. Whisler and informed him that Freeport-McMoRan proposed
to revise the terms of its offer for Phelps Dodge to reduce the
cash portion from $88.00 to $78.00, and to increase the stock
portion to 0.84 shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock for
each Phelps Dodge common share. Mr. Adkerson emphasized
that while Freeport-McMoRans proposal changed the mix of
cash and stock consideration to be offered to Phelps Dodge
shareholders, based on closing prices as of November 13,
2006, the implied values of Freeport-McMoRans
November 3, 2006 proposal and his revised offer of that day
were essentially identical in terms of value.
On November 14, 2006, the Phelps Dodge board of directors
met telephonically to discuss Freeport-McMoRans revised
offer. At this meeting, Mr. Whisler reported on his
discussion with Mr. Adkerson. The board of directors
instructed Mr. Whisler to inform Mr. Adkerson that
Phelps Dodge was prepared to move forward on the terms of the
November 3, 2006 offer but was not willing to consider any
modification of those terms. Mr. Whisler conveyed this
message to Mr. Adkerson by telephone following the meeting.
On November 14 and 15, 2006, representatives of Phelps
Dodge visited Freeport-McMoRans mines in the Grasberg
minerals district, its milling and production operations and its
concentrate loading facilities in Papua, Indonesia.
On November 16, 2006, the Freeport-McMoRan board of
directors held a meeting with senior management and
representatives of its financial advisors, JPMorgan and Merrill
Lynch, and legal advisors, Davis Polk & Wardwell and
Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrère &
Denègre, L.L.P. participating. At this meeting,
Freeport-McMoRans senior management reviewed the strategic
rationale for the proposed transaction, informed the board of
directors on the results of the due diligence investigation of
Phelps Dodge and reported on the financial analysis of the
combined company. Members of Freeport-McMoRans senior
management responded to questions from members of the board of
directors confirming and clarifying the bases for their
presentations. Mr. Adkerson then updated the board of
directors on the status of the discussions with Phelps Dodge and
reviewed the terms of Freeport-McMoRans initial proposal
and modified proposal following due diligence. He noted that the
modified proposal reduced the total cash payable to Phelps Dodge
shareholders but maintained essentially the same total value
offered in the original proposal by increasing the portion of
the price that would be paid in stock. Mr. Adkerson and
representatives of JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch then reviewed
capital structure considerations, including the alternatives to
reduce the amount of debt following the acquisition. Members of
Freeport-McMoRans senior management and representatives of
JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch responded to questions from members
of the board of directors with respect to capital structure
considerations. Members of Freeport-McMoRans senior
management and a representative of Davis Polk &
Wardwell also responded to questions regarding the proposed
terms of the merger agreement. Following discussion, the board
of directors authorized Freeport-McMoRans senior
management to proceed with the transaction based on the original
terms of $88 in cash and 0.67 shares of Freeport-McMoRan
common stock for each Phelps Dodge common share.
40
Following Freeport-McMoRans board meeting on
November 16, 2006, Mr. Adkerson telephoned
Mr. Whisler and informed him that Freeport-McMoRan was
prepared to move forward on its offer of $88.00 in cash and
0.67 shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock for each
Phelps Dodge common share, as proposed on November 3, 2006.
The parties and their advisors then proceeded to complete their
respective due diligence investigations and finalize the merger
agreement.
The board of directors of Freeport-McMoRan met on
November 18, 2006. At this meeting, members of
Freeport-McMoRans senior management updated the board of
directors on the results of Freeport-McMoRans due
diligence investigation of Phelps Dodge. Representatives of
JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch discussed with the board of directors
the financial terms of the proposed transaction and each firm
delivered to the board of directors an oral opinion,
subsequently confirmed in writing, that as of November 18,
2006, and based upon and subject to the assumptions,
qualifications and limitations set forth in those opinions, the
consideration of $88.00 in cash and 0.67 shares of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock for each Phelps Dodge common share
was fair, from a financial point of view, to Freeport-McMoRan. A
representative of Davis Polk & Wardwell reviewed the
principal terms of the merger agreement with the board of
directors. Members of Freeport-McMoRans senior management
then reviewed the terms of the proposed financing commitment for
the acquisition of Phelps Dodge. Members of
Freeport-McMoRans senior management and representatives of
JPMorgan, Merrill Lynch and Davis Polk & Wardwell
responded to questions from members of the board of directors
confirming and clarifying the bases for their presentations and,
in the case of JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch, their respective
fairness opinions. After discussion, the board of directors
unanimously approved the terms of the transaction and execution
of the transaction documents.
The board of directors of Phelps Dodge met on November 18,
2006. At this meeting, members of Phelps Dodges senior
management briefed the board of directors on the results of the
companys due diligence investigation of Freeport-McMoRan.
A representative of Debevoise & Plimpton LLP discussed
with the board of directors their fiduciary duties and briefed
the board of directors on the terms of the transaction
documents. Representatives of Citigroup and Morgan Stanley
discussed with the board of directors the financial terms of the
proposed transaction and each firm delivered to the board of
directors an oral opinion, subsequently confirmed in writing,
that as of November 18, 2006, and based upon and subject to
the factors and qualifications set forth in these opinions, the
consideration of $88 in cash and 0.67 shares of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock for each Phelps Dodge common share
to be received by Phelps Dodge shareholders pursuant to the
merger agreement was fair to Phelps Dodge shareholders from a
financial point of view. Members of Phelps Dodges senior
management and representatives of Debevoise & Plimpton
LLP, Citigroup and Morgan Stanley responded to questions from
members of the board of directors confirming and clarifying the
bases for their presentations and, in the case of Citigroup and
Morgan Stanley, their respective fairness opinions. After
discussion, the board of directors unanimously approved the
terms of the transaction and execution of the transaction
documents.
Freeport-McMoRans
Reasons for the Transaction; Recommendation of the
Freeport-McMoRan Board of Directors
The Freeport-McMoRan board of directors consulted with
Freeport-McMoRans senior management and its financial and
legal advisors in reaching its decision to enter into the
transaction and recommend that Freeport-McMoRan shareholders
vote FOR the proposals to amend the Freeport-McMoRan
certificate of incorporation and to issue Freeport-McMoRan
common stock in connection with the transaction.
In reaching this decision, the Freeport-McMoRan board of
directors considered the following material factors:
|
|
|
|
|
the belief of the Freeport-McMoRan board of directors that the
combined company will be well-positioned to benefit from the
positive copper market at a time when there is a scarcity of
large-scale copper development projects combined with strong
global demand for copper;
|
|
|
|
the belief of the Freeport-McMoRan board of directors that the
combined companys increased scale of operations,
management depth and strengthened cash flow will provide an
improved platform to capitalize on growth opportunities in the
global market;
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that the combined company will have long-lived,
geographically diverse reserves totaling 75 billion pounds
of copper, 41 million ounces of gold and 1.9 billion
pounds of molybdenum, net of minority interests;
|
|
|
|
the expectation that the combined company will generate strong
cash flows, enabling significant debt reduction;
|
|
|
|
the expectation that the transaction will be accretive to
Freeport-McMoRans cash flows and earnings, subject to the
potential earnings impact of purchase accounting adjustments for
metal inventories as discussed under Unaudited Pro Forma
Condensed Combined Financial Statements beginning on
page 108 and Risk Factors beginning on
page 22;
|
|
|
|
the expectation that the combined companys project
pipeline will support growth by delivering nearly one billion
pounds of additional copper production capacity over the next
three years;
|
|
|
|
recent projects of Phelps Dodge, including Phelps Dodges
recent commissioning of the $850 million expansion of the
Cerro Verde mine in Peru, the development of the new
$550 million Safford mine in Arizona, a potential project
to extend the life of El Abra through sulfide leaching and the
Tenke Fungurume copper/cobalt development project in the
Democratic Republic of the Congo, which is expected to begin
production by 2009;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the combined company will have significant high
potential exploration rights in copper regions around the world,
including Freeport-McMoRans prospective acreage in Papua,
Indonesia, and Phelps Dodges opportunities at its Tenke
Fungurume concessions in the Democratic Republic of the Congo,
in the United States and in South America;
|
|
|
|
the Freeport-McMoRan board of directors belief that the
combination of Freeport-McMoRans and Phelps Dodges
proven management and best practices in open pit and underground
mining will facilitate the sharing of expertise to optimize
operations across the asset base of the combined company, and
that Phelps Dodges mining and processing technology will
provide opportunities that can be applied to optimize metal
production at Freeport-McMoRans Grasberg site;
|
|
|
|
presentations by Freeport-McMoRans management and
Freeport-McMoRans financial advisors regarding Phelps
Dodges business, operations, properties and assets,
financial condition, competitive position, business strategy and
growth prospects;
|
|
|
|
the current and historical market prices of the Freeport-McMoRan
common stock and Phelps Dodge common shares relative to those of
other industry participants;
|
|
|
|
the oral opinions of each of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated,
which were subsequently confirmed in written opinions dated
November 18, 2006, that, as of such date, and based upon
and subject to the assumptions, qualifications and limitations
set forth in those opinions, the consideration to be paid by
Freeport-McMoRan to the Phelps Dodge shareholders in the merger
was fair, from a financial point of view, to Freeport-McMoRan;
|
|
|
|
the terms and conditions of the merger agreement, including that:
|
|
|
|
|
|
under certain circumstances and subject to certain conditions,
Freeport-McMoRan can furnish information to and conduct
negotiations with a third party in connection with an
unsolicited potentially superior proposal for an acquisition of
Freeport-McMoRan and the Freeport-McMoRan board of directors can
terminate the merger agreement to accept a superior proposal;
|
|
|
|
under certain circumstances and subject to certain conditions,
the Freeport-McMoRan board of directors can change its
recommendation if it determines in good faith that the failure
to change its recommendation would be inconsistent with its
fiduciary duties;
|
|
|
|
while Phelps Dodge has reciprocal rights to respond to
unsolicited third-party proposals, to change its recommendation
and to terminate the merger agreement for a superior proposal,
Phelps Dodge would be required to pay Freeport-McMoRan a
termination fee of $750 million if Phelps Dodge terminates
the merger agreement in order to accept a superior proposal, the
Phelps Dodge board of directors, subject to certain exceptions,
changes its recommendation that the Freeport-McMoRan
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
shareholders vote in favor of the transaction, and under certain
other circumstances specified in the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the requirement, subject to certain exceptions, that Phelps
Dodge pay to Freeport-McMoRan a termination fee of
$375 million if the Phelps Dodge shareholders fail to
approve and adopt the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the conditions to be satisfied prior to the completion of the
transaction are customary and can be expected to be fulfilled in
the ordinary course; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the availability to Freeport-McMoRan of the financing necessary
to complete the transaction, and the terms and conditions of
that financing, as reflected in the commitment letters entered
into by Freeport-McMoRan and its financing sources.
|
In addition to these factors, the Freeport-McMoRan board of
directors considered potential risks relating to the
transaction, primarily consisting of the following, but
concluded that the positive factors outweighed these negative
factors:
|
|
|
|
|
the risks described in this document under Risk
Factors;
|
|
|
|
the risk that, because the exchange ratio will not be adjusted
for changes in the market price of Freeport-McMoRan common stock
or Phelps Dodge common shares, the per share value of the
consideration to be paid to Phelps Dodge shareholders upon
completion of the transaction could be more than the per share
value of the consideration immediately prior to the announcement
of the proposed transaction;
|
|
|
|
the fact that Freeport-McMoRans obligation to complete the
transaction is not conditioned on its receipt of the necessary
financing;
|
|
|
|
the risk that a substantial decline in the price of copper could
have a material adverse impact on the combined company,
including its ability to repay the debt incurred in order to
finance the transaction;
|
|
|
|
the risks and costs to Freeport-McMoRan if the transaction is
not completed (including the diversion of management and
employee attention and the loss of business opportunities that
might otherwise have been pursued), notwithstanding the
likelihood of the transaction being completed; and
|
|
|
|
the restriction on the conduct by Freeport-McMoRan of its
business during the period between the signing of the merger
agreement and the completion of the transaction or the
termination of the merger agreement, which could delay or
prevent Freeport-McMoRan from pursuing business opportunities
that may arise pending completion of the transaction.
|
In its review of the proposed transaction,
Freeport-McMoRans board also reviewed and considered the
interests that certain officers and directors of
Freeport-McMoRan may have with respect to the transaction. These
interests are described under the heading Interests of
Certain Persons in the Transaction
Freeport-McMoRan on page 77.
Due to the variety of factors and the quality and amount of
information considered, the Freeport-McMoRan board of directors
did not find it practicable to and did not make specific
assessments of, quantify or assign relative weights to the
specific factors considered in reaching its determination to
approve the merger agreement and the transaction and the
issuance of Freeport-McMoRan common stock in connection with the
transaction. Instead, the Freeport-McMoRan board of directors
made its determination after consideration of all factors taken
together. In addition, individual members of the
Freeport-McMoRan board of directors may have given different
weight to different factors. Some information presented in this
section is forward-looking in nature and, therefore, should be
read in light of the factors discussed under Cautionary
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.
Recommendation of the Freeport-McMoRan Board of
Directors. At a meeting held on
November 18, 2006, after due consideration with
Freeport-McMoRans management and advisors, the
Freeport-McMoRan board of directors determined, by unanimous
vote of the members present, that the merger agreement and the
transaction were fair to and in the best interests of
Freeport-McMoRan and its shareholders and approved the merger
agreement and the related transactions, the proposed amendment
of the certificate of incorporation and the proposed issuance of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock in
43
connection with the transaction. The Freeport-McMoRan board
of directors recommends that Freeport-McMoRan shareholders
vote:
|
|
|
|
|
FOR the amendment to the Freeport-McMoRan certificate of
incorporation, which includes increasing the number of
authorized shares of Freeport-McMoRan capital stock to
750,000,000 and increasing the authorized number of shares of
common stock to 700,000,000;
|
|
|
|
FOR the issuance of Freeport-McMoRan common stock in
connection with the transaction; and
|
|
|
|
FOR the adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary, to
permit solicitation of additional proxies in favor of the above
proposals.
|
Phelps
Dodge Reasons for the Transaction; Recommendation of the Phelps
Dodge Board of Directors
The Phelps Dodge board of directors believes that the merger
agreement and the transaction are advisable and fair to and in
the best interests of Phelps Dodges shareholders.
Accordingly, the Phelps Dodge board of directors has unanimously
approved the entry into the merger agreement, and recommends
that Phelps Dodge shareholders vote FOR the approval and
adoption of the merger agreement.
As described above under Background of the
Transaction, the Phelps Dodge board of directors, prior to
and in reaching its decision at its meeting on November 18,
2006, to approve the entry into the merger agreement, consulted
on numerous occasions with Phelps Dodges senior executive
officers and financial and legal advisors, and considered a
variety of factors weighing positively in favor of the
transaction, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the value to be received by holders of Phelps Dodge common
shares in the transaction, including the fact that the value of
the merger consideration represented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
a premium of approximately 33% over the closing price of Phelps
Dodge common shares on November 17, 2006, the last trading
day prior to the entry into the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
premiums of approximately 32% and 38% over the average closing
price of Phelps Dodge common shares for the
30-day and
60-day
periods, respectively, ending with November 16,
2006; and
|
|
|
|
a premium of approximately 23% over the all-time high closing
price of Phelps Dodge common shares;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that approximately 70% of the merger consideration will
be paid in cash (based on the closing price of Freeport-McMoRan
common stock on November 17, 2006), and that the aggregate
cash consideration of approximately $18 billion represents
approximately 87% of the all-time high equity market
capitalization of Phelps Dodge;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the former Phelps Dodge shareholders as a group
will own approximately 41% of the outstanding Freeport-McMoRan
common stock immediately following the transaction (38% on a
fully diluted basis), which will provide Phelps Dodge
shareholders with the opportunity to participate in the growth
opportunities of the combined company;
|
|
|
|
the fact that Phelps Dodge shareholders who want to have a
greater exposure to the growth opportunities of the combined
company have the ability to use all or part of the cash proceeds
to invest in Freeport-McMoRan common stock following the
transaction;
|
|
|
|
the strategic nature of the transaction, which will combine the
Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan businesses to create the
worlds second largest copper company, and a leading
producer of gold and molybdenum, with long-lived, geographically
diverse assets and significant proven and probable reserves;
|
|
|
|
the extraordinary size and low cost position of
Freeport-McMoRans Grasberg mine, the worlds largest
copper and gold mine in terms of reserves, which should enable
the combined company to compete more advantageously throughout
the copper price cycle;
|
|
|
|
the scale of the combined company, which should permit it to
compete more effectively than either Phelps Dodge or
Freeport-McMoRan alone and facilitate investment in future
development projects, exploration and acquisitions;
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
the opportunity to apply best practices to operate a larger
asset portfolio more efficiently;
|
|
|
|
the separate opinions of Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated described in the
section entitled Opinions of Phelps Dodges Financial
Advisors beginning on page 59, including their
respective analyses rendered orally on and confirmed in writing
as of November 18, 2006, to the effect that, as of that
date, and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions
set forth in their respective opinions, the merger consideration
proposed to be received by holders of Phelps Dodge common shares
pursuant to the merger agreement was fair, from a financial
point of view, to such holders;
|
|
|
|
the terms and conditions of the merger agreement, including that:
|
|
|
|
|
|
under certain circumstances and subject to conditions more fully
described in the section entitled The Merger
Agreement Principal Covenants beginning on
page 70, Phelps Dodge can furnish information to and
conduct negotiations with a third party in connection with an
unsolicited proposal for a business combination or acquisition
that could reasonably be expected to result in a superior
proposal, and the Phelps Dodge board of directors can terminate
the merger agreement for a superior proposal or change its
recommendation prior to shareholder approval of the merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
while Freeport-McMoRan has reciprocal rights to respond to
unsolicited third-party proposals, to change its recommendation
and to terminate the merger agreement for a superior proposal,
Freeport-McMoRan would be required to pay a termination fee of
$375 million to Phelps Dodge if Freeport-McMoRan terminates
the merger agreement in order to accept a superior proposal, the
Freeport-McMoRan board of directors, subject to certain
exceptions, changes its recommendation that the companys
shareholders vote in favor of the transaction, and under certain
other circumstances specified in the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the requirement, subject to certain exceptions, that
Freeport-McMoRan pay to Phelps Dodge a termination fee of
$187.5 million if the Freeport-McMoRan shareholders fail to
approve the transaction;
|
|
|
|
the completion of the transaction is not conditioned on
Freeport-McMoRans obtaining financing;
|
|
|
|
the conditions to be satisfied prior to the completion of the
transaction are customary and can be expected to be fulfilled in
the ordinary course;
|
|
|
|
three members of the Phelps Dodge board of directors will be
appointed to the Freeport-McMoRan board of directors upon the
consummation of the transaction, which is expected to provide a
degree of continuity and involvement by Phelps Dodge directors
in the combined company following the transaction; and
|
|
|
|
until December 31, 2007, Freeport-McMoRan has agreed to
provide Phelps Dodge employees compensation, other than
equity-based compensation, and benefit plans substantially
comparable in the aggregate to those provided to them
immediately prior to the consummation of the transaction (except
for employees represented for purposes of collective bargaining)
and that, until December 31, 2008, Freeport-McMoRan has
agreed to continue Phelps Dodges retirement plans and
savings plans; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that the headquarters of the combined company will be
in Phoenix, Arizona, and that certain executive officers of
Phelps Dodge will assume senior management positions with the
combined company.
|
The Phelps Dodge board of directors also considered the
potential adverse impact of other factors weighing negatively
against the proposed transaction, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that Freeport-McMoRans business is heavily
dependent upon its ability to continue to operate the Grasberg
mine successfully, which is subject to significant risks
including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the risks posed by the mines location in Papua, Indonesia,
which the Phelps Dodge board of directors believes is a
politically volatile region that periodically experiences social
unrest;
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
the risk that, although Freeport-McMoRan believes that its
principal operating subsidiary, PT Freeport Indonesia, is in
compliance in all material respects with its Contract of Work
with the Indonesian government, the Contract of Work is subject
to termination if PT Freeport Indonesia does not comply with its
obligations and, if a dispute arises with respect to the
Contract of Work, Freeport-McMoRan and PT Freeport Indonesia may
have to submit to the jurisdiction of a foreign court or
arbitration panel; and
|
|
|
|
the risk of an adverse effect on Freeport-McMoRans
business arising out of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the ongoing evaluation by a joint team of Indonesian
governmental officials formed in 2006 to review PT Freeport
Indonesias compliance with its Contract of Work, including
applicable environmental laws and regulations; and
|
|
|
|
requests received by Freeport-McMoRan from governmental
authorities in the United States and Indonesia for information
about PT Freeport Indonesias support of Indonesian
government security institutions and compliance with applicable
laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the risk that the inquiries by governmental authorities in the
United States and Indonesia with respect to Freeport-McMoRan
could result in an unfavorable outcome that could adversely
affect Freeport-McMoRans business;
|
|
|
|
the risk that the transaction might not be completed, including
the effect that any such failure may have on the trading price
of Phelps Dodge common shares;
|
|
|
|
the risk that, because the stock portion of the merger
consideration is a fixed number of shares of Freeport-McMoRan
common stock and the merger agreement does not provide Phelps
Dodge with a price-based termination right, Phelps Dodge
shareholders could be adversely affected by a decrease in the
trading price of shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock;
|
|
|
|
the limitations imposed in the merger agreement on, among other
things, Phelps Dodges ability prior to the completion of
the transaction to solicit or enter into any agreement related
to an alternative transaction, or enter into any discussions of
any proposals that may result in an alternative transaction, as
more fully described in the section entitled The Merger
Agreement Principal Covenants No
Solicitation;
|
|
|
|
the requirement that Phelps Dodge pay to Freeport-McMoRan a
termination fee of $750 million if Phelps Dodge terminates
the merger agreement in order to accept a superior proposal for
the company, the Phelps Dodge board of directors, subject to
certain exceptions, changes its recommendation that the
companys shareholders vote in favor of the transaction,
and under certain other circumstances specified in the merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
the requirement, subject to certain exceptions, that Phelps
Dodge pay to Freeport-McMoRan a termination fee of
$375 million if the Phelps Dodge shareholders fail to
approve the transaction;
|
|
|
|
risks associated with the combined companys greater
indebtedness when compared to Phelps Dodges and
Freeport-McMoRans outstanding pre-combination total
indebtedness, including the risk that a substantial decline in
the price of copper could have a material adverse impact on the
combined companys ability to repay its debt; and
|
|
|
|
the risks described in the section entitled Risk
Factors beginning on page 22.
|
In addition to the factors described above, in the course of its
meetings the Phelps Dodge board of directors reviewed and
considered a wide variety of other information relevant to the
transaction, including:
|
|
|
|
|
information concerning Phelps Dodges and
Freeport-McMoRans businesses, historical financial
performance and condition, operations, competitive positions,
prospects and management, including the results of Phelps
Dodges due diligence investigation of Freeport-McMoRan;
|
|
|
|
the fact that both Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan would
require shareholder approval of the proposed
transaction; and
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
the interests that certain executive officers and directors of
Phelps Dodge may have with respect to the transaction in
addition to their interests as shareholders of Phelps Dodge
generally, as described in the section entitled Interests
of Certain Persons in the Transaction Phelps
Dodge on page 78.
|
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors
considered by the Phelps Dodge board of directors is not
exhaustive, but includes the material factors considered by the
board. In view of the wide variety of factors, both positive and
negative, considered by the Phelps Dodge board of directors, the
board of directors did not consider it practical to, nor did it
attempt to, quantify, rank or otherwise seek to assign relative
weights to the specific factors that it considered in reaching
its determination that the merger agreement and the transaction
are advisable and fair to and in the best interests of Phelps
Dodge shareholders. Rather, the Phelps Dodge board of directors
viewed its determinations as being based upon the judgment of
its members, in light of the totality of information presented
and considered, including the knowledge of such directors of
Phelps Dodges business, financial condition and prospects
and the advice of financial and legal advisors. In considering
the factors described above, individual members of the Phelps
Dodge board of directors may have given different weight to
different factors and may have applied different analyses to
each of the material factors considered.
Recommendation of the Phelps Dodge Board of
Directors. At a meeting held on
November 18, 2006, after due consideration with Phelps
Dodges management and advisors, the Phelps Dodge board of
directors determined, by unanimous vote, that the merger
agreement and the transaction are fair to and in the best
interests of Phelps Dodge shareholders. The Phelps Dodge board
of directors recommends that Phelps Dodge shareholders vote:
|
|
|
|
|
FOR the approval and adoption of the merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
FOR the adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary, to
permit solicitation of additional proxies in favor of the
proposal above.
|
Governance
After the Transaction
At the closing of the transaction, the Freeport-McMoRan board of
directors will consist of sixteen directors, thirteen of whom
will be Freeport-McMoRan directors prior to the transaction and
three of whom will be selected from current independent
directors of Phelps Dodge (the identity of whom will be agreed
upon by Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge prior to the closing
of the transaction).
See Interests of Certain Persons in the Transaction
for a description of the material interests of the directors and
executive officers of Phelps Dodge in the transaction that are
in addition to, or different from, their interests as
shareholders. Additional information about the current directors
and executive officers of Phelps Dodge can be found in the
annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005, of Phelps Dodge,
which is incorporated by reference into this document. See
Where You Can Find More Information beginning on
page 120.
Public
Trading Markets
Freeport-McMoRan common stock is currently listed on the New
York Stock Exchange under the symbol FCX. Phelps
Dodge common shares are currently listed on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol PD. Upon completion of the
transaction, Phelps Dodge common shares will be delisted from
the New York Stock Exchange and will be deregistered under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The newly issued
Freeport-McMoRan common stock issuable pursuant to the merger
agreement will be listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
The shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock to be issued in
connection with the transaction will be freely transferable
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except for shares
issued to any shareholder who may be deemed to be an affiliate
of Phelps Dodge, as discussed in Resales of
Freeport-McMoRan Stock by Phelps Dodge Affiliates.
As reported on the New York Stock Exchange, the closing sale
price per share of Freeport-McMoRan common stock on
November 17, 2006, the last business day prior to the
announcement of the transaction, was $57.40. As reported on the
New York Stock Exchange, the closing sale price per Phelps Dodge
common share on that date was $95.02. Based on the closing sale
price per share of Freeport-McMoRan common stock, the
47
implied value to be paid in the transaction for each Phelps
Dodge common share was $126.46 on that date. The closing sale
price per share of Freeport-McMoRan common stock on
February 9, 2007, was $53.65 and the closing sale price per
Phelps Dodge common share on that date was $121.95. Based on the
closing sale price per share of Freeport-McMoRan common stock,
the implied value to be paid in the transaction for each Phelps
Dodge common share was $123.95 as of that date. The implied
value to be paid in the transaction for each Phelps Dodge common
share as of those dates was calculated by adding $88.00 to the
product of the closing price of Freeport-McMoRan common stock
and the exchange ratio of 0.67.
Appraisal
Rights
Freeport-McMoRan shareholders are not entitled to appraisal
rights under Delaware law in connection with the transaction.
Phelps Dodge shareholders are not entitled to appraisal rights
under New York law in connection with the transaction.
Transaction
Financing
Freeport-McMoRan will have cash requirements of approximately
$18.5 billion in connection with the transaction, including
both the cash consideration and transaction costs. As of
December 31, 2006, Freeport-McMoRan had $907.5 million
of cash, cash equivalents and investments and Phelps Dodge had
approximately $5.0 billion in cash and cash equivalents
(including approximately $0.5 billion attributable to
minority participants shares), of which approximately
$3.9 billion was held in the U.S. and approximately
$1.1 billion was held internationally. In order to
refinance its existing credit facilities and finance part of the
cash consideration and transaction costs, Freeport-McMoRan has
obtained a commitment letter from JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.,
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Merrill Lynch Capital
Corporation and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
Incorporated for $11.5 billion in new senior secured credit
facilities, to consist of a five-year Tranche A term loan
facility of $2.5 billion, a seven-year Tranche B term
loan facility of $7.5 billion, a five-year revolving credit
facility of $1.5 billion, and a $6.0 billion senior
unsecured bridge facility. Freeport-McMoRan intends to issue and
sell, in a public offering or a Rule 144A or other private
placement, $6.0 billion of senior unsecured notes to
finance a portion of the cash consideration and transaction
costs. To the extent that it does not issue notes in an
aggregate amount equal to $6.0 billion, it will borrow an
amount under the unsecured bridge facility described above equal
to $6.0 billion minus the aggregate principal amount of
notes issued. The remainder of the cash requirements will be met
from cash available at Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge.
Subject to market conditions, Freeport-McMoRan intends to
consider opportunities to reduce the debt of the combined
company shortly following the closing through issuances of
equity or equity-linked securities or through asset sales.
The availability of the new senior secured and senior unsecured
bridge credit facilities is subject to certain conditions
contained in the commitment letter, including the absence of any
material adverse effect (as defined in the merger agreement) in
respect of Phelps Dodge and its subsidiaries.
Pricing for the Tranche A term facility and the revolving
facility is expected to be adjusted LIBOR or base rate, at the
option of Freeport-McMoRan, plus a spread to be determined by
reference to a grid based on a leverage ratio to be determined
and the credit ratings of Freeport-McMoRan. Initially, the
spreads for the Tranche A term facility and the revolving
facility are expected to be adjusted LIBOR plus 175 basis
points (1.75%) per annum or base rate plus 75 basis points
(0.75%) per annum. In addition, Freeport-McMoRan is expected to
pay a commitment fee on the unused portion of the revolving
credit facility at a rate to be determined by reference to a
grid based on a leverage ratio to be determined and the credit
ratings of Freeport-McMoRan. Initially, the commitment fee on
the unused portion of the revolving credit facility is expected
to be 50 basis points (0.50%) per annum. Pricing for the
Tranche B term facility is expected to be adjusted LIBOR
plus 200 basis points (2.00%) per annum or base rate plus
100 basis points (1.00%) per annum.
Freeport-McMoRan has represented to Phelps Dodge in the merger
agreement that it will have available to it, at the time the
transaction is completed, sufficient funds to enable
Freeport-McMoRan to complete the transaction. The availability
of such funds is not a condition to Freeport-McMoRans
obligation to complete the transaction.
48
Resales
of Freeport-McMoRan Stock by Phelps Dodge Affiliates
Affiliates of Phelps Dodge, as defined under Rule 145 under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, referred to in this
document as the Securities Act, generally may not sell their
shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock acquired in the
transaction except pursuant to an effective registration
statement under the Securities Act, or an applicable exemption
from such registration requirements, including Rules 144
and 145 issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission under
the Securities Act.
Under the merger agreement, Phelps Dodge must provide
Freeport-McMoRan with a list of the persons who, to Phelps
Dodges knowledge, may be deemed to be affiliates of Phelps
Dodge. Phelps Dodge will also use its reasonable best efforts to
deliver to Freeport-McMoRan a letter agreement executed by each
of these persons by which that person will agree, among other
things, not to offer to sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of
any of the shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock distributed
to him or her pursuant to the transaction except in compliance
with Rule 144 and Rule 145 under the Securities Act,
or in a transaction that, in the opinion of counsel reasonably
satisfactory to Freeport-McMoRan, is otherwise exempt from such
registration requirements or in an offering registered under the
Securities Act. Freeport-McMoRan may place restrictive legends
on Freeport-McMoRan common stock certificates that are issued in
the transaction to persons who are deemed to be affiliates of
Phelps Dodge under the Securities Act.
The registration statement of which this document forms a part
does not cover any resales of Freeport-McMoRan common stock
received in the transaction by any person who may be deemed an
affiliate of Phelps Dodge.
Recent
Developments
On November 22, December 12 and December 14, 2006,
putative class actions were filed on behalf of Phelps Dodge
shareholders in Arizona state court, New York state court and
Arizona state court, respectively. The class actions allege
breaches of fiduciary duties by the Phelps Dodge board of
directors in connection with the transaction. The complaints
allege, among other things, that the named defendants engaged in
self-dealing, obtained for themselves personal benefits not
shared equally by Phelps Dodge shareholders and failed to
disclose all material information concerning the transaction to
Phelps Dodge shareholders. One complaint names Freeport-McMoRan
as a defendant and alleges that Freeport-McMoRan aided and
abetted such alleged violations of fiduciary duties. The
plaintiffs seek, among other things, injunctive relief barring
consummation of the transaction and directing that the
defendants obtain a transaction which is in the best interests
of Phelps Dodge shareholders.
Phelps Dodge, Freeport-McMoRan and the other named defendants
believe the allegations are without merit and intend to
vigorously defend the actions.
49
OPINIONS
OF FREEPORT-MCMORANS FINANCIAL ADVISORS
At the special meeting of the Freeport-McMoRan board on
November 18, 2006, each of J.P. Morgan Securities
Inc., referred to in this document as JPMorgan, and Merrill
Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, referred to
in this document as Merrill Lynch, rendered its oral opinion,
subsequently confirmed in writing, to the Freeport-McMoRan board
of directors that, as of that date and based upon and subject to
the assumptions, qualifications and limitations set forth in
such opinion, the merger consideration to be paid pursuant to
the transaction was fair, from a financial point of view, to
Freeport-McMoRan.
The full text of the opinions of JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch,
each dated November 18, 2006, which set forth, among other
things, the assumptions made, the procedures followed, matters
considered and qualifications and limitations of the reviews
undertaken by each of JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch in rendering
their respective opinions, are attached as Appendix B and
Appendix C, respectively, to this document and are
incorporated herein by reference. JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch
have consented to the inclusion of their respective opinions
herein. The summary of the JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch fairness
opinions set forth herein is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the full text of each of the opinions.
Freeport-McMoRan shareholders should read these opinions
carefully and in their entirety. Each of JPMorgan and Merrill
Lynch provided its opinion for the information and assistance of
the Freeport-McMoRan board of directors in connection with its
consideration of the transaction and did not express an opinion
as to the fairness of the transaction (or merger consideration)
to, or any consideration of, the holders of any class of
securities, creditors or other constituencies of
Freeport-McMoRan or as to the underlying decision by
Freeport-McMoRan to engage in the transaction. Neither the
JPMorgan opinion nor the Merrill Lynch opinion is a
recommendation to any Freeport-McMoRan shareholder as to how any
shareholder should vote with respect to the transaction or any
other matter and should not be relied upon by any
Freeport-McMoRan shareholder as such.
Opinion
of JPMorgan
In connection with rendering its opinion, JPMorgan, among other
things:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed a draft dated November 17, 2006 of the merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain publicly available business and financial
information concerning Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan and the
industries in which they operate that JPMorgan deemed to be
relevant;
|
|
|
|
compared the proposed financial terms of the transaction with
publicly available financial terms of certain other transactions
involving companies JPMorgan deemed to be relevant;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the financial and operating performance of Phelps Dodge
and Freeport-McMoRan and compared them with those of certain
publicly traded companies that JPMorgan deemed to be relevant;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the current and historical market prices and valuation
multiples of the Phelps Dodge common shares and the
Freeport-McMoRan common stock and compared them with those of
certain publicly traded companies that JPMorgan deemed to be
relevant;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain information, including financial analyses and
forecasts prepared by the managements of Phelps Dodge and
Freeport-McMoRan relating to their respective businesses;
|
|
|
|
participated in certain discussions and negotiations among
representatives of Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan and their
financial and legal advisors;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the potential pro forma impact of the
transaction; and
|
|
|
|
performed such other financial studies and analyses and took
into account such other information and matters as JPMorgan
deemed appropriate.
|
In addition, JPMorgan conducted discussions with certain members
of the management and representatives of Phelps Dodge and
Freeport-McMoRan with respect to certain aspects of the
transaction, and the past and current business operations of
Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan, the financial condition and
future prospects and operations of Phelps Dodge and
Freeport-McMoRan, the effects of the transaction on the
financial condition and future prospects of Phelps Dodge and
Freeport-McMoRan, including concerning the
50
matters described in the second and sixth bullets above, and
certain other matters JPMorgan believed necessary or appropriate
to its inquiry.
In rendering its opinion, JPMorgan relied upon and assumed,
without assuming responsibility or liability for independent
verification, the accuracy and completeness of all information
that was publicly available or was furnished to or discussed
with it or otherwise reviewed by or for it. JPMorgan did not
conduct any valuation or appraisal of any assets or liabilities
of Phelps Dodge or Freeport-McMoRan, nor did it evaluate the
solvency or fair value of Phelps Dodge or Freeport-McMoRan under
any state or federal laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or
similar matters. JPMorgan did not assume any obligation to
conduct any physical inspection of the properties or facilities
of Phelps Dodge or Freeport-McMoRan. In relying on financial
analyses and forecasts provided to or discussed with it by
Phelps Dodge or Freeport-McMoRan, JPMorgan assumed that they had
been reasonably prepared and reflect the best currently
available estimates and judgment by Phelps Dodges or
Freeport-McMoRans management as to the expected future
results of operations and financial condition of Phelps Dodge or
Freeport-McMoRan, as the case may be. JPMorgan expressed no view
as to such analyses or forecasts or the assumptions on which
they were based. JPMorgan also assumed that the transaction will
have the tax consequences described in discussions with, and
materials furnished to it by, representatives of
Freeport-McMoRan, that, in all respects material to its
analysis, the other transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement will be consummated as described in the merger
agreement and that the final form of the merger agreement would
be substantially similar to the last draft thereof reviewed by
it. JPMorgan also assumed that the representations and
warranties made by Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan in the
merger agreement were and will be true and correct in all
respects material to its analysis. JPMorgan is not a legal,
regulatory or tax expert and relied on the assessments made by
advisors to Freeport-McMoRan with respect to such issues.
JPMorgan further assumed that all governmental, regulatory or
other consents and approvals (contractual or otherwise)
necessary for the consummation of the transaction will be
obtained without any material adverse effect on Phelps Dodge or
Freeport-McMoRan or on the contemplated benefits of the
transaction.
The JPMorgan opinion was necessarily based on economic, market
and other conditions as they existed and could be evaluated on,
and the information made available to it as of, the date of its
opinion. Subsequent developments may affect its opinion, and
JPMorgan does not have any obligation to update, revise, or
reaffirm its opinion. The JPMorgan opinion was provided to the
board of directors of Freeport-McMoRan in connection with and
for the purposes of its evaluation of the transaction. The
JPMorgan opinion is limited to the fairness, from a financial
point of view, to Freeport-McMoRan of the merger consideration
to be paid in the transaction and JPMorgan is expressing no
opinion as to the fairness of the transaction (or the merger
consideration) to, or any consideration of, the holders of any
class of securities, creditors or other constituencies of
Freeport-McMoRan or as to the underlying decision by
Freeport-McMoRan to engage in the transaction. JPMorgan is
expressing no opinion as to the price at which the
Freeport-McMoRan common stock or Phelps Dodge common shares will
trade at any time after the date of its opinion. The JPMorgan
opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any shareholder
of Freeport-McMoRan as to how such shareholder should vote with
respect to the transaction or any other matter.
Opinion
of Merrill Lynch
In arriving at its opinion, Merrill Lynch, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain publicly available business and financial
information concerning Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan and the
industries in which they operate that Merrill Lynch deemed to be
relevant;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain information, including financial analyses and
forecasts prepared by the managements of Phelps Dodge and
Freeport-McMoRan, relating to their respective businesses;
|
|
|
|
conducted discussions with certain members of the management and
representatives of Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan with
respect to certain aspects of the transaction, and the past and
current business operations of Phelps Dodge and
Freeport-McMoRan, the financial condition and future prospects
and operations of Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan, the effects
of the transaction on the financial condition and future
prospects of Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan, including
concerning
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
the matters described in the two preceding bullet points, and
certain other matters Merrill Lynch believed necessary or
appropriate to its inquiry;
|
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed the current and historical market prices and valuation
multiples for Phelps Dodge common shares and Freeport-McMoRan
common stock and compared them with those of certain publicly
traded companies that Merrill Lynch deemed to be relevant;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the financial and operating performance of Phelps Dodge
and Freeport-McMoRan and compared them with those of certain
publicly traded companies that Merrill Lynch deemed to be
relevant;
|
|
|
|
compared the proposed financial terms of the transaction with
the publicly available financial terms of certain other
transactions involving companies Merrill Lynch deemed to be
relevant;
|
|
|
|
participated in certain discussions and negotiations among
representatives of Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan and their
financial and legal advisors;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the potential pro forma impact of the transaction;
|
|
|
|
reviewed a draft of the merger agreement dated November 17,
2006; and
|
|
|
|
performed such other financial studies and analyses and took
into account such other information and matters as Merrill Lynch
deemed appropriate.
|
In preparing its opinion, Merrill Lynch assumed and relied on
the accuracy and completeness of all information supplied or
otherwise made available to it, discussed with or reviewed by or
for it, or publicly available. Merrill Lynch did not assume any
responsibility or liability for independently verifying such
information or undertake an evaluation or appraisal of any of
the assets or liabilities of Phelps Dodge or Freeport-McMoRan,
nor did it evaluate the solvency or fair value of Phelps Dodge
or Freeport-McMoRan under any state or federal laws relating to
bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters. In addition, Merrill
Lynch did not assume any obligation to conduct any physical
inspection of the properties or facilities of Phelps Dodge or
Freeport-McMoRan. In relying on the financial analyses or
forecasts furnished to or discussed with it by Phelps Dodge or
Freeport-McMoRan, Merrill Lynch assumed that they had been
reasonably prepared and reflect the best currently available
estimates and judgment of Phelps Dodges or
Freeport-McMoRans management as to the expected future
results of operations and financial condition of Phelps Dodge or
Freeport-McMoRan, as the case may be. Merrill Lynch expressed no
view as to such analyses or forecasts or the assumptions on
which they were based. Merrill Lynch also assumed that the
transaction will have the tax consequences described in
discussions with, and all materials provided to it by,
representatives of Freeport-McMoRan, that, in all respects
material to its analysis, the other transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement will be consummated as described in the
merger agreement and that the final form of the merger agreement
would be substantially similar to the last draft reviewed by it.
Merrill Lynch also assumed that the representations and
warranties made by Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan in the
merger agreement were and will be true and correct in all ways
material to its analysis. Merrill Lynch is not a legal,
regulatory or tax expert and relied on the assessments made by
advisors to Freeport-McMoRan with respect to such issues.
The Merrill Lynch opinion was necessarily based upon market,
economic and other conditions as they existed and could be
evaluated on, and on the information made available to it as of,
the date of its opinion. Subsequent developments may affect its
opinion and Merrill Lynch does not have any obligation to
update, revise, or reaffirm its opinion. Merrill Lynch assumed
that all governmental, regulatory or other consents or approvals
(contractual or otherwise) necessary for the consummation of the
transaction will be obtained without any material adverse effect
on Phelps Dodge or Freeport-McMoRan or the contemplated benefits
of the transaction.
The Merrill Lynch opinion was for the use and benefit of the
board of directors of Freeport-McMoRan in connection with and
for the purpose of its evaluation of the transaction, and the
Merrill Lynch opinion does not address the merits of the
underlying decision by Freeport-McMoRan to engage in the
transaction and does not constitute a recommendation to any
shareholder of Freeport-McMoRan as to how such shareholder
should vote with respect to the transaction or any matter
related thereto. In addition, the Merrill Lynch opinion does not
address the fairness to, or any other consideration of, the
holders of any class of securities, creditors or other
constituencies of Freeport-McMoRan. Merrill Lynch is not
expressing any opinion as to the prices at
52
which Freeport-McMoRan common stock or Phelps Dodge common
shares will trade following the announcement or consummation of
the transaction.
Joint
Financial Analyses of Freeport-McMoRans Financial
Advisors
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses
jointly performed by JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch in connection
with rendering their respective opinions described above and
contained in the presentations that were delivered to the
Freeport-McMoRan board of directors on November 18, 2006.
Some of the summaries of the financial analyses include
information presented in tabular format. The tables are not
intended to stand alone, and in order to more fully understand
the financial analyses used by JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch, the
tables must be read together with the full text of each summary.
Considering the data set forth below without considering the
full narrative description of the financial analyses, including
the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could
create a misleading or incomplete view of JPMorgans and
Merrill Lynchs financial analyses.
JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch performed their analyses with respect
to Phelps Dodge and with respect to Freeport-McMoRan on a
stand-alone and a pro forma basis based on financial forecasts
provided by the managements of Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps
Dodge. Such forecasts were made on the basis of three
alternative future commodity price scenarios provided by
Freeport-McMoRan management: the Street Price Case
forecast case (based on consensus equity analyst projections of
future commodity prices), the Forward Curve Case
forecast case (based on currently prevailing forward commodity
prices), and the 20% Discount to Street Price Case
forecast case (based on future commodity prices 20% below
consensus equity analyst projections). Due to the inherent
challenges of predicting future commodity prices, the management
of Freeport-McMoRan instructed JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch to
apply equal weighting to the three forecast cases in evaluating
the transaction. All market data used by JPMorgan and Merrill
Lynch in its analyses were as of November 16, 2006. The
implied per share offer value in the transaction used in the
following analyses is $125.63, which reflects the cash
consideration in the transaction of $88.00 and the stock
consideration in the transaction of 0.67 of a share of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock times $56.16, the per share
closing price of Freeport-McMoRan common stock on
November 16, 2006.
Implied
Valuation Analyses
JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch performed various implied valuation
analyses of the Phelps Dodge common shares, as described below.
The implied values derived by JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch and set
forth below are rounded to the nearest $0.25. For purposes of
the implied valuation analyses, diluted shares of Phelps Dodge
were calculated using the treasury stock method, based on
204 million basic Phelps Dodge common shares outstanding
and options to acquire 0.6 million Phelps Dodge common
shares at an exercise price of $44.90. The valuation date of the
various analyses is as of December 31, 2006 based on the
forecasts provided by the managements of Freeport-McMoRan and
Phelps Dodge.
Historical Stock Trading and Analyst Price Targets
Analyses. JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch compared the
per share closing price of Phelps Dodge on November 16,
2006 and the implied per share offer value of $125.63 for Phelps
Dodge as of November 16, 2006 to the
52-week
trading range for Phelps Dodge for the period ended
November 16, 2006 and selected analyst price targets found
in publicly available equity research. The trading range for the
52-week
period ended November 16, 2006 for Phelps Dodge was $61.80
to $103.90 and the range of analyst
12-month
price targets for Phelps Dodge was $105.00 to $170.00, as
compared to $94.88, the per share closing price of Phelps Dodge
on November 16, 2006, and $125.63, the implied per share
offer value in the transaction for Phelps Dodge as of
November 16, 2006. JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch noted that
historical stock trading and analyst price targets analyses are
not valuation methodologies but were presented merely for
informational purposes.
Other Publicly Traded Mining Company Trading Multiples
Analysis. Using publicly available information,
JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch calculated a range of implied per
share values for Phelps Dodge based on the calculation of the
ratio of firm value to estimated EBITDA for 2007 (based on
consensus estimates from the Institutional Brokerage Estimate
System, or IBES) for certain publicly traded mining companies.
JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch calculated the firm value of each
such company by adding the sum of its long-term and short-term
debt to the sum of the market value of its common equity, the
book value of its preferred stock and
53
the book value of its minority interest, and subtracting cash
and cash equivalents. JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch also calculated
the ratio of firm value to the estimated EBITDA for 2007 for
Phelps Dodge. Estimated EBITDA for 2007 for Phelps Dodge was
provided by the management of Phelps Dodge based on the Street
Price Case, Forward Curve Case and 20% Discount to Street Price
Case forecast cases, and in each instance excluded the
proportionate share of EBITDA derived from non-wholly owned
subsidiaries that was attributable to the minority shareholders
in those subsidiaries.
In addition to Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge, the following
companies were selected by JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch, based on
their experience with companies in the mining industry, as
potentially relevant to an evaluation of Phelps Dodge
and/or
Freeport-McMoRan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Firm Value/2007E EBITDA
|
|
|
Base Metal Group:
|
|
|
|
|
OJSC MMC Norilsk Nickel
|
|
|
3.8x
|
|
Southern Copper Corp.
|
|
|
4.3x
|
|
Kazakhmys PLC
|
|
|
3.9x
|
|
Antofagasta PLC
|
|
|
3.7x
|
|
Median
|
|
|
3.9x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Firm Value/2007E EBITDA
|
|
|
Diversified Mining
Group:
|
|
|
|
|
BHP Billiton LTD.
|
|
|
6.1x
|
|
Companhia Vale do Rio Doce
|
|
|
8.1x
|
|
Anglo American PLC
|
|
|
6.5x
|
|
Rio Tinto PLC
|
|
|
5.8x
|
|
Xstrata PLC
|
|
|
6.9x
|
|
Teck Cominco LTD.
|
|
|
4.3x
|
|
Median
|
|
|
6.3x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Firm Value/2007E EBITDA
|
|
|
Major Gold Group:
|
|
|
|
|
Barrick Gold Corp.
|
|
|
8.8x
|
|
Newmont Mining Corp.
|
|
|
8.7x
|
|
Median
|
|
|
8.7x
|
|
JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch determined, based on their experience
with companies in the mining industry, that the base metal group
was the appropriate group against which to compare Phelps Dodge,
and therefore calculated an implied per share valuation range
for Phelps Dodge by applying a range of multiples of 3.5x to
4.5x derived from this analysis to the three forecast cases of
2007 EBITDA for Phelps Dodge.
Based on this analysis, JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch derived an
implied per share range of values for Phelps Dodge of
approximately $95.25 to $119.00 using the Street Price Case
forecast case, $103.00 to $129.00 using the Forward Curve Case
forecast case and $73.75 to $91.50 using the 20% Discount to
Street Price Case forecast case, assuming consolidated cash of
Phelps Dodge of $3,478 million (which reflects adjustments
for a minority interest dividend, withholding taxes and copper
hedge cash costs) and consolidated debt of Phelps Dodge of
$883 million, and excluding the minority interest in
consolidated cash and consolidated debt. JPMorgan and Merrill
Lynch noted that the implied per share offer value in the
transaction for Phelps Dodge was $125.63 as of November 16,
2006 and the per share closing price of Phelps Dodge was $94.88
on November 16, 2006.
54
Precedent Transactions Multiples
Analysis. Using company filings, company
presentations and information from Factset, JPMorgan and Merrill
Lynch examined the following selected transactions within the
mining industry.
|
|
|
|
|
Announced Date
|
|
Acquirer
|
|
Target
|
|
08/11/2006
|
|
Companhia Vale do Rio Doce
|
|
Inco LTD
|
05/17/2006
|
|
Xstrata PLC
|
|
Falconbridge LTD
|
03/08/2005
|
|
BHP Billiton LTD
|
|
WMC Resources INC
|
03/08/2005
|
|
Noranda INC
|
|
Falconbridge LTD
|
10/22/2004
|
|
Southern Peru Copper Corp
|
|
Minera México, S.A. de C.V.
|
04/30/2001
|
|
Teck Corp
|
|
Cominco LTD
|
03/19/2001
|
|
BHP LTD
|
|
Billiton PLC
|
JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch calculated the transaction value in
the selected transactions as a multiple of latest twelve months
(LTM) EBITDA of the target companies. JPMorgan and
Merrill Lynch calculated transaction value for purposes of this
analysis by adding each target companys sum of its
long-term and short-term debt to the sum of the value of its
common equity based on the price per share at which the acquirer
intended to purchase its common equity as of the date of
announcement of the transaction, the book value of its preferred
stock and the book value of its minority interest, and
subtracting cash and cash equivalents. No transaction reviewed
was directly comparable to the proposed transaction and,
accordingly, this analysis involved complex considerations and
judgments concerning differences in financial and operating
characteristics of Phelps Dodge relative to the targets in the
selected transactions and other factors that would affect the
acquisition values in the precedent transactions.
JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch calculated that the ratio of the firm
value to the LTM EBITDA for the target companies ranged from a
low of 5.6x to a high of 11.6x with a median of 7.5x (as
compared to the implied offer multiple for the transaction of
6.2x). JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch also noted that in the case of
the two most recent transactions (the multiples for which were
9.4x and 11.2x), such transactions occurred during a period of
rapidly rising commodity prices and when such analysis was
performed on the basis of annualizing the EBITDA of the last
quarter prior to the transaction, the relevant multiples were
6.9x and 7.6x, respectively. Based on the analysis of the
transaction value in the selected transactions as a multiple of
LTM EBITDA, JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch applied a range of
6.0x 8.0x to Phelps Dodges 2006 EBITDA
forecasts provided by the management of Phelps Dodge, excluding
the proportionate share of EBITDA derived from non-wholly owned
subsidiaries that was attributable to the minority shareholders
in those subsidiaries, and derived an implied per share range of
values for Phelps Dodge of approximately $122.25
$159.25 based on 2006 EBITDA projections, assuming consolidated
cash of Phelps Dodge of $3,478 million (which reflects
adjustments for a minority interest dividend, withholding taxes
and copper hedge cash costs) and consolidated debt of Phelps
Dodge of $883 million, and excluding the minority interest
in consolidated cash and consolidated debt. JPMorgan and Merrill
Lynch noted that the implied per share offer value in the
transaction for Phelps Dodge was $125.63 as of November 16,
2006 and the per share closing price of Phelps Dodge was $94.88
on November 16, 2006.
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Using
projections provided by the management of Phelps Dodge, JPMorgan
and Merrill Lynch conducted discounted cash flow analyses of
Phelps Dodge to calculate ranges of implied per share values of
Phelps Dodge. A discounted cash flow analysis is a method of
evaluating an asset using estimates of the future unlevered free
cash flows generated by assets and taking into consideration the
time value of money with respect to those future cash flows by
calculating their present value. Present
value refers to the current value of one or more future
cash payments from the asset, which we refer to as that
assets cash flows, and is obtained by discounting those
cash flows back to the present using a discount rate that takes
into account macro-economic assumptions and estimates of risk,
the opportunity cost of capital, capitalized returns and other
appropriate factors. Terminal value refers to the
capitalized value of all cash flows from an asset for periods
beyond the final forecast period.
For Phelps Dodge, JPMorgan performed its discounted cash flow
analyses based on the Street Price Case, Forward Curve Case and
20% Discount to Street Price Case forecast cases provided by
managements of
55
Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge and certain other publicly
available information, assuming consolidated cash of Phelps
Dodge of $4,327 million (which reflects adjustments for a
minority interest dividend and withholding taxes, but does not
reflect copper hedge cash costs) and consolidated debt of Phelps
Dodge of $883 million, and excluding the minority interest
in consolidated cash and consolidated debt. JPMorgan calculated
unlevered free cash flows expected to be generated by Phelps
Dodge during the years ended 2007 through 2016 as estimated EBIT
(defined as earnings before interest and taxes), less cash
taxes, plus depreciation and amortization, less deferred
stripping costs, plus other additions, less capital
expenditures, less restricted investments and other deductions,
and less changes in net working capital. In addition, JPMorgan
calculated the terminal value using a range of estimated free
cash flow perpetuity growth rates of 2.5% to 3.5%. Using
discount rates ranging from 9.0% 11.0% (selected
based upon an analysis of the weighted average cost of capital
of Phelps Dodge), JPMorgan derived a range of per share implied
values for Phelps Dodge of approximately $106.25
$136.50 based on the Street Price Case forecast case,
$139.25 $172.00 based on Forward Curve Case forecast
case and $89.00 $118.50 based on 20% Discount to
Street Price Case forecast case. JPMorgan noted that the implied
per share offer value in the transaction for Phelps Dodge was
$125.63 as of November 16, 2006 and the per share closing
price of Phelps Dodge was $94.88 on November 16, 2006.
For Phelps Dodge, Merrill Lynch performed its discounted cash
flow analyses based on the Street Price Case, Forward Curve Case
and 20% Discount to Street Price Case forecast cases provided by
managements of Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge and certain
other publicly available information, assuming consolidated cash
of Phelps Dodge of $4,327 million (which reflects
adjustments for a minority interest dividend, withholding taxes,
but does not reflect copper hedge cash costs) and consolidated
debt of Phelps Dodge of $883 million, and excluding the
value of the minority interest. Merrill Lynch calculated
unlevered free cash flows expected to be generated by Phelps
Dodge during the years ended 2007 through 2010 as estimated
EBIT, less cash taxes, plus depreciation and amortization, less
capital expenditures, less restricted investments, less changes
in net working capital and reflecting other changes. Merrill
Lynch derived the discounted cash flow values for Phelps Dodge
as the sum of the net present values of (1) the estimated
unlevered free cash flows that Phelps Dodge would generate for
fiscal 2007 through 2010 and (2) the terminal value of
Phelps Dodge at the end of that period. The terminal value for
Phelps Dodge was calculated by applying a range of multiples of
EBITDA from 6.5x to 7.5x to the average of the estimated EBITDA
from 2007 to 2010. Merrill Lynch used discount rates ranging
from 11.0% to 13.0% selected based on an analysis of the
weighted average cost of capital of Phelps Dodge.
Based on the discounted cash flow analysis, Merrill Lynch
derived an implied per share range of values for Phelps Dodge of
approximately $108.75 $129.00 based on the Street
Price Case forecast case, $161.00 $194.00 based on
Forward Curve Case forecast case and $77.25 $91.00
based on 20% Discount to Street Price Case forecast case.
Merrill Lynch noted that the implied per share offer value in
the transaction for Phelps Dodge was $125.63 as of
November 16, 2006 and the per share closing price of Phelps
Dodge was $94.88 on November 16, 2006.
Other
Pro Forma Accretion/Dilution
Analysis. JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch prepared an
analysis of cash flow per share (CFPS, defined as
cash flow from operations) and earnings per share
(EPS) potential accretion/dilution for
Freeport-McMoRan pro forma for the transaction using Street
Price Case, Forward Curve Case and 20% Discount to Street Price
Case forecast cases. JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch noted that such
analysis indicated that the transaction would be accretive to
Freeport-McMoRans CFPS in all three forecast cases in both
2007 and 2008 (calculated assuming the transaction closed on
December 31, 2006). JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch noted that
such analysis indicated that the transaction would be accretive
to Freeport-McMoRans EPS in both 2007 and 2008 in the
Street Price Case and the Forward Curve Case forecast cases, and
accretive to EPS in 2007 and dilutive to EPS in 2008 in the 20%
Discount to Street Price Case forecast cases (calculated
assuming the transaction closed on December 31, 2006). This
analysis was based on preliminary purchase accounting
assumptions that were provided to JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch by
Freeport-McMoRan.
56
Relative Financial Contribution
Analysis. JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch calculated
the relative financial contributions of Freeport-McMoRan and
Phelps Dodge to the combined estimated 2006 revenues, EBITDA and
net income of the companies based on forecasts provided by the
managements of Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge. Such analysis
indicated that Phelps Dodge would have contributed 67% of the
combined estimated 2006 revenues, 60% of the combined estimated
2006 EBITDA and 68% of the combined estimated 2006 net
income of the companies. Net income was not adjusted for the pro
forma impact of purchase accounting, and the forecasts provided
by the management of Phelps Dodge of the estimated 2006 net
income were adjusted to reflect Freeport-McMoRans
expectation of additional withholding tax.
Freeport-McMoRan Confirmatory Implied Valuation
Analyses. JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch performed
confirmatory implied valuation analyses with respect to
Freeport-McMoRan using substantially similar analyses and
methodologies to those used with respect to Phelps Dodge as
described above (with the exception of the precedent transaction
multiples analysis) in order to assess the value indicated by
the per share closing price of the Freeport-McMoRan common stock
on November 16, 2006 for purposes of its inclusion as part
of the transaction consideration. Such analyses indicated
results consistent with the use of the Freeport-McMoRan common
stock as a partial form of consideration for the transaction.
General
In connection with the review of the transaction by the
Freeport-McMoRan board, JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch performed a
variety of generally accepted financial and comparable analyses
for purposes of rendering their respective opinions. The
preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process and is
not susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. In
arriving at their respective opinions, JPMorgan and Merrill
Lynch each considered the results of all of its analyses as a
whole and did not attribute any particular weight to any
analysis or factor considered by it, but rather made its
determination as to fairness on the basis of its experience and
professional judgment after considering the results of all of
its analyses. However, due to the inherent challenges of
predicting future commodity prices, the management of
Freeport-McMoRan instructed JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch to apply
equal weighting to the Street Price Case, Forward Curve Case and
20% Discount to Street Price Case in evaluating the transaction.
JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch believe that the summary provided and
the analyses described above must be considered as a whole and
that selecting any portion of their analyses, without
considering all of them, would create an incomplete view of the
process underlying their analyses and opinions. As a result, the
ranges of valuations resulting from any particular analysis or
combination of analyses described above were merely utilized to
create points of reference for analytical purposes and should
not be taken to be the view of JPMorgan or Merrill Lynch with
respect to the actual value of Freeport-McMoRan or Phelps Dodge.
In performing their analyses, JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch made,
and were provided by the management of each of Freeport-McMoRan
and Phelps Dodge, numerous assumptions with respect to industry
performance, general business and economic conditions and other
matters, many of which are beyond the control of JPMorgan,
Merrill Lynch, Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge. Analyses based
on estimates or forecasts of future results are not necessarily
indicative of future results or actual values, which may be
significantly more or less favorable than those suggested by
such analyses. The analyses described above were performed
solely as part of the respective analyses of JPMorgan and
Merrill Lynch of the fairness of the merger consideration, from
a financial point of view, to Freeport-McMoRan, and were
performed in connection with the delivery by JPMorgan and
Merrill Lynch of their respective opinions, each dated
November 18, 2006, to the Freeport-McMoRan board of
directors. The analyses do not purport to be appraisals or to
reflect the prices at which Freeport-McMoRan common stock will
trade following the announcement or consummation of the
transaction. Because such analyses are inherently subject to
uncertainty, being based upon numerous factors or events beyond
the control of Freeport-McMoRan, Phelps Dodge or their
respective advisors, none of Freeport-McMoRan, Phelps Dodge,
JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch, nor any other person assumes
responsibility if future results or actual values are materially
different from these forecasts or assumptions. The merger
consideration and other terms of the transaction were determined
through arms-length negotiations between Freeport-McMoRan
and Phelps Dodge and were approved by the Freeport-McMoRan board
of directors.
The respective opinions of JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch were one
of many factors taken into consideration by the Freeport-McMoRan
board of directors in making its determination to approve the
57
transaction. The analyses of JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch
summarized above should not be viewed as determinative of the
opinion of the Freeport-McMoRan board of directors with respect
to the value of Freeport-McMoRan or Phelps Dodge, or of whether
the Freeport-McMoRan board of directors would have been willing
to agree to different or other forms of merger consideration.
The foregoing summary does not purport to be a complete
description of the analyses performed by JPMorgan and Merrill
Lynch.
The Freeport-McMoRan board of directors selected JPMorgan and
Merrill Lynch as its financial advisors because of their
reputations as internationally recognized investment banking and
advisory firms with substantial experience in transactions
similar to this transaction and because JPMorgan and Merrill
Lynch are each familiar with Freeport-McMoRan and its business.
As part of its investment banking and financial advisory
business, each of JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch is continually
engaged in the valuation of businesses and their securities in
connection with mergers and acquisitions, negotiated
underwritings, competitive biddings, secondary distributions of
listed and unlisted securities, private placements and
valuations for corporate and other purposes.
JPMorgan and its affiliates have performed in the past, and may
continue to perform, certain financial advisory and other
investment banking and commercial banking services for
Freeport-McMoRan, Phelps Dodge and their respective affiliates,
all for customary compensation. Such past services have included
acting as bookrunning arranger and agent bank for
Freeport-McMoRans revolving credit facility in August
2006, acting as bookrunning lead managing underwriter for
Freeport-McMoRans public offerings of its debt securities
in 2003 and 2004, acting as dealer manager for Phelps
Dodges tender offer for its outstanding debt securities in
2005, and acting as bookrunning lead managing underwriter for
Phelps Dodges offering of its equity and equity-linked
securities in 2002. In addition, certain of JPMorgans
affiliates are lenders to, and parties to derivatives and
hedging transactions with, Freeport-McMoRan, Phelps Dodge and
their respective affiliates. In addition, JPMorgan expects that
it and its affiliates will arrange
and/or
provide financing to Freeport-McMoRan specifically in connection
with the transaction for additional compensation. In the
ordinary course of its businesses, JPMorgan and its affiliates
may actively trade the debt and equity securities of
Freeport-McMoRan or Phelps Dodge for its own account or for the
accounts of customers and, accordingly, JPMorgan may at any time
hold long or short positions in such securities.
Merrill Lynch has, in the past, provided financial advisory and
financing services to Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge and may
continue to do so and has received, and may receive, customary
fees for the rendering of such services. Past services include
having acted as dealer manager in connection with a tender offer
for certain of the Freeport-McMoRans convertible bonds in
2006, acting as a joint-bookrunner on Freeport-McMoRans
convertible perpetual preferred stock offering in 2004, and
participating in Freeport-McMoRans revolving credit
facility in 2003. Merrill Lynch is also providing financing to
Freeport-McMoRan in connection with the transaction and will
receive compensation for doing so. In addition, in the ordinary
course of its business, Merrill Lynch may actively trade
Freeport-McMoRan common stock and other securities of
Freeport-McMoRan, as well as Phelps Dodge common shares and
other securities of Phelps Dodge, for its own account and for
the accounts of customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold
a long or short position in such securities.
Under the terms of separate letter agreements, Freeport-McMoRan
engaged each of JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch to act as its
financial advisor in connection with the transaction. Pursuant
to the terms of its letter agreement with JPMorgan dated as of
November 18, 2006, Freeport-McMoRan has agreed to pay
JPMorgan a fee for its services (including for the delivery of
the JPMorgan opinion) in an aggregate amount equal to
$25 million, a substantial portion of which will become
payable only if the transaction is consummated. Pursuant to the
terms of its letter agreement with Merrill Lynch dated
November 18, 2006, Freeport-McMoRan has agreed to pay
Merrill Lynch a fee for its services (including for the delivery
of the Merrill Lynch opinion) in an aggregate amount equal to
$25 million, a substantial portion of which will become
payable only if the transaction is consummated. Freeport-McMoRan
has also agreed to reimburse each of JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch
for its reasonable expenses incurred in connection with the
engagement, including travel costs, document production and
other customary expenses, including the reasonable fees and
disbursements of legal counsel, and to indemnify each of
JPMorgan, Merrill Lynch and their related parties from and
against certain liabilities.
58
OPINIONS
OF PHELPS DODGES FINANCIAL ADVISORS
Opinions
of Phelps Dodges Financial Advisors
Phelps Dodge retained Citigroup and Morgan Stanley as its
financial advisors in connection with the transaction. In
connection with their engagement, Phelps Dodge requested that
Citigroup and Morgan Stanley evaluate the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to the holders of Phelps Dodge common
shares of the merger consideration to be received by such
holders pursuant to the merger agreement. On November 18,
2006, the Phelps Dodge board of directors met to review the
terms of the merger agreement. At that meeting, Citigroup and
Morgan Stanley made a joint presentation in which they reviewed
with the Phelps Dodge board of directors certain financial
analyses as described below, and each rendered to the Phelps
Dodge board of directors an oral opinion, subsequently confirmed
in writing, that as of November 18, 2006, and subject to
the factors, assumptions, procedures, limitations and
qualifications set forth in their respective opinions, the
merger consideration to be received by the holders of Phelps
Dodge common shares pursuant to the merger agreement was fair
from a financial point of view to such holders.
Citigroups and Morgan Stanleys written opinions,
each dated November 18, 2006, to the Phelps Dodge board of
directors, the full text of which sets forth, among other
things, the general procedures followed, factors considered,
assumptions made, and limitations and qualifications on the
review undertaken by each of Citigroup and Morgan Stanley in
rendering their opinions, are attached as Appendix D and
Appendix E, respectively, and are incorporated into this
joint proxy statement/prospectus by reference in their entirety.
You are encouraged to read these opinions carefully in their
entirety. Citigroups and Morgan Stanleys respective
opinions speak only as of the date of such opinions.
Citigroups and Morgan Stanleys opinions were
provided to the Phelps Dodge board of directors for its
information in connection with its evaluation of the merger
consideration and relate only to the fairness, from a financial
point of view, of the merger consideration to the holders of
Phelps Dodge common shares. Their respective opinions were not
intended to be, and do not constitute, any opinion or
recommendation to any shareholder as to how such shareholder
should vote or act on any matter relating to the proposed
merger. The summaries of Citigroups and Morgan
Stanleys opinions in this document are qualified in their
entirety by reference to the full text of the opinions.
Opinion
of Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
In arriving at its opinion, Citigroup reviewed a draft dated
November 17, 2006 of the merger agreement and held
discussions with certain senior officers, directors and other
representatives and advisors of Phelps Dodge and certain senior
officers and other representatives and advisors of
Freeport-McMoRan concerning the business, operations and
prospects of Phelps Dodge. Citigroup also reviewed the draft
debt financing commitment letter, dated November 17, 2006,
to be received by Freeport-McMoRan from JP Morgan Securities
Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Merrill Lynch Capital
Corporation in connection with financing the merger. Citigroup
examined certain publicly available business and financial
information relating to Phelps Dodge as well as certain
financial forecasts and other information and data relating to
Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan which were provided to or
discussed with Citigroup by the respective managements of Phelps
Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan, including information relating to
the potential strategic implications and operational benefits
(including the amount, timing and achievability thereof)
anticipated by the managements of Phelps Dodge and
Freeport-McMoRan to result from the merger. Citigroup reviewed
the financial terms of the merger as set forth in the merger
agreement in relation to, among other things: current and
historical market prices and trading volumes of the Phelps Dodge
common shares and Freeport-McMoRan common stock; the historical
and projected earnings and other operating data of Phelps Dodge
and Freeport-McMoRan; and the capitalization and financial
condition of Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan. Citigroup
considered, to the extent publicly available, the financial
terms of certain other transactions which it considered relevant
in evaluating the merger and analyzed certain financial, stock
market and other publicly available information relating to the
businesses of other companies whose operations Citigroup
considered relevant in evaluating those of Phelps Dodge and
Freeport-McMoRan. In addition to the foregoing, Citigroup
conducted such other analyses and examinations and considered
such other information and financial, economic and market
criteria as Citigroup deemed appropriate in arriving at its
opinion.
59
In rendering its opinion, Citigroup assumed and relied, without
assuming any responsibility for independent verification, upon
the accuracy and completeness of all financial and other
information and data publicly available or provided to or
otherwise reviewed by or discussed with Citigroup and upon the
assurances of the managements of Phelps Dodge and
Freeport-McMoRan that they were not aware of any relevant
information that had been omitted or that remained undisclosed
to it. With respect to financial forecasts and other information
and data relating to Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan provided
to or otherwise reviewed by or discussed with Citigroup,
Citigroup has been advised by the respective managements of
Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan, that such forecasts and other
information and data were reasonably prepared on bases
reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments
of the managements of Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan as to
the future financial performance of Phelps Dodge and
Freeport-McMoRan, and the potential strategic implications and
operational benefits (including the amount, timing and
achievability thereof) anticipated to result from the merger and
the other matters covered thereby. Citigroup has assumed, with
the consent of Phelps Dodge, that the merger will be consummated
in accordance with its terms, without waiver, modification or
amendment of any material term, condition or agreement, that the
financing of the merger will be consummated in accordance with
the terms of the November 17, 2006 draft debt financing
commitment letter and that, in the course of obtaining the
necessary regulatory or third party approvals, consents and
releases for the merger, no delay, limitation, restriction or
condition will be imposed that would have an adverse effect on
Phelps Dodge, Freeport-McMoRan or the contemplated benefits of
the merger. Representatives of Phelps Dodge advised Citigroup,
and Citigroup further assumed, that the final terms of the
merger agreement will not vary materially from those set forth
in the draft reviewed by Citigroup. Citigroup did not express
any opinion as to what the value of the Freeport-McMoRan common
stock actually will be when issued pursuant to the merger or the
price at which the Freeport-McMoRan common stock will trade at
any time. Citigroup did not make, nor was it provided with, an
independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities
(contingent or otherwise) of Phelps Dodge or Freeport-McMoRan
nor did it make any physical inspection of the properties or
assets of Phelps Dodge or Freeport-McMoRan. Citigroup was not
requested to, and did not, solicit third party indications of
interest in the possible acquisition of all or a part of Phelps
Dodge, nor was it requested to consider, and its opinion does
not address, the relative merits of the merger as compared to
any alternative business strategies that might exist for Phelps
Dodge or the effect of any other transaction in which Phelps
Dodge might engage. Citigroups opinion is necessarily
based upon information available to it, and financial, stock
market and other conditions and circumstances existing, as of
the date of its opinion. Events occurring after
November 18, 2006 may affect the opinion of Citigroup and
the assumptions used in preparing it, and Citigroup did not
assume any obligation to update, revise or reaffirm its opinion.
Citigroup and its affiliates in the past have provided services
to Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan unrelated to the proposed
merger, for which services Citigroup and such affiliates have
received compensation, including, without limitation, acting as
advisor and providing financing commitments to Phelps Dodge in
connection with its proposed combination with Inco Limited in
June 2006 which was subsequently terminated, acting as
underwriter for Phelps Dodge in its Peruvian bond offering for
Cerro Verde in April 2006, acting as advisor to Phelps Dodge in
its sale of Columbian Chemicals Company in March 2006, acting as
underwriter in the sale of Phelps Dodges investment in
Southern Copper Corporation in June 2005, acting as lead
arranger in Phelps Dodges $1.1 billion revolving
credit facility in May 2005, and acting as co-documentation
agent in Freeport-McMoRans $465 million revolving
credit facility. In the ordinary course of its business,
Citigroup and its affiliates may actively trade or hold the
securities of Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan for its own
account or for the account of its customers and, accordingly,
may at any time hold a long or short position in such
securities. In addition, Citigroup and its affiliates (including
Citigroup Inc. and its affiliates) may maintain relationships
with Phelps Dodge, Freeport-McMoRan and their respective
affiliates.
Opinion
of Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
In connection with rendering its opinion, Morgan Stanley, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain publicly available financial statements and
other business and financial information of Phelps Dodge and
Freeport-McMoRan, respectively;
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain internal financial statements and other
financial and operating data concerning Phelps Dodge prepared by
the management of Phelps Dodge;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain financial projections prepared by the
management of Phelps Dodge;
|
|
|
|
discussed the past and current operations and financial
condition and the prospects of Phelps Dodge, with senior
executives of Phelps Dodge;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain internal financial statements and other
financial and operating data concerning Freeport-McMoRan
prepared by the management of Freeport-McMoRan;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain financial projections prepared by the
management of Freeport-McMoRan;
|
|
|
|
discussed the past and current operations and financial
condition and the prospects of Freeport-McMoRan, with senior
executives of Freeport-McMoRan;
|
|
|
|
discussed certain information relating to strategic, financial
and operational benefits anticipated from the merger and the
strategic rationale for the merger, with senior executives of
Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the pro forma impact of the merger on certain financial
ratios of the combined company;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the reported prices and trading activity for Phelps
Dodge common shares and the Freeport-McMoRan common stock;
|
|
|
|
compared the financial performance of Phelps Dodge and
Freeport-McMoRan and the prices and trading activity of Phelps
Dodge common shares and the Freeport-McMoRan common stock with
that of certain other publicly-traded companies comparable with
Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan, respectively, and their
securities;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the financial terms, to the extent publicly available,
of certain comparable acquisition transactions;
|
|
|
|
participated in discussions and negotiations among
representatives of Phelps Dodge, Freeport-McMoRan and their
financial and legal advisors;
|
|
|
|
reviewed a November 17, 2006 draft of
Freeport-McMoRans debt financing commitment letter;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the draft merger agreement, dated November 17,
2006, and certain related documents; and
|
|
|
|
considered such other factors and performed such other analyses
as Morgan Stanley deemed appropriate.
|
In rendering its opinion, Morgan Stanley assumed and relied
upon, without independent verification, the accuracy and
completeness of the information supplied or otherwise made
available to it by Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan for the
purposes of its opinion. With respect to the financial
projections supplied to or discussed with Morgan Stanley,
including information relating to strategic, financial and
operational benefits anticipated from the merger, Morgan Stanley
assumed they had been reasonably prepared on bases reflecting
the best currently available estimates and judgments of the
future financial performance of Phelps Dodge and
Freeport-McMoRan. Morgan Stanley also relied without independent
verification on the assessments of managements of Phelps Dodge
and Freeport-McMoRan, respectively, of the strategic rationale
of the merger. In addition, Morgan Stanley assumed that the
merger will be consummated in accordance with the terms set
forth in the merger agreement with no waiver, delay or amendment
of any other terms or conditions and that the financing of the
merger will be consummated in accordance with the terms set
forth in the November 17, 2006 draft debt financing
commitment letter. Morgan Stanley assumed that in connection
with the receipt of all the necessary governmental, regulatory
and other approvals and consents required for the proposed
merger, no delays, limitations, conditions or restrictions will
be imposed that would have a material adverse effect on the
contemplated benefits expected to be derived in the proposed
merger. Morgan Stanley is not a legal, regulatory, accounting or
tax expert and assumed the accuracy and veracity of assessments
by such advisors to Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan with
respect to such issues. Morgan Stanley also relied upon, without
independent verification, the assessment by the managements of
Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan, respectively, of the timing
and risks associated with the integration of Phelps Dodge and
Freeport-McMoRan. Morgan Stanley did not make any independent
valuation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities of Phelps
61
Dodge or Freeport-McMoRan, nor was it furnished with any such
appraisals. Morgan Stanleys opinion was necessarily based
on financial, economic, market and other conditions as in effect
on, and the information made available to it as of
November 18, 2006. Events occurring after November 18,
2006 may affect the opinion of Morgan Stanley and the
assumptions used in preparing it, and Morgan Stanley did not
assume any obligation to update, revise or reaffirm its opinion.
In arriving at its opinion, Morgan Stanley was not authorized to
solicit, and did not solicit, interest from any party with
respect to an acquisition, business combination or other
extraordinary transaction involving Phelps Dodge or any of its
assets, nor did it negotiate with any parties, other than
Freeport-McMoRan, with respect to the possible acquisition of
Phelps Dodge or certain of its constituent businesses.
In the past, Morgan Stanley and its affiliates have provided
financial advisory and financing services for Phelps Dodge and
have received fees for the rendering of these services. In
addition, Morgan Stanley is a full service securities firm
engaged in securities, commodities and currency trading,
investment management and brokerage services. In the ordinary
course of its trading, brokerage, investment management and
financing activities, Morgan Stanley or its affiliates may at
any time hold long or short positions, and may trade or
otherwise effect transactions, for its own account or the
accounts of customers, in debt or equity securities or senior
loans of Freeport-McMoRan, Phelps Dodge or any other company or
any currency or commodity that may be involved in the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
Joint
Financial Analyses of Citigroup and Morgan Stanley
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses
performed by Citigroup and Morgan Stanley in evaluating the
fairness, from a financial point of view, of the merger
consideration to be received by the holders of Phelps Dodge
common shares pursuant to the merger agreement. Citigroup and
Morgan Stanley collaborated in performing each of the financial
analyses summarized below. The following summary, however, does
not purport to be a complete description of the financial
analyses performed by Citigroup and Morgan Stanley, nor does the
order of analyses described represent relative importance or
weight given to those analyses by Citigroup or Morgan Stanley.
Some of the summaries of financial analyses include information
presented in a tabular format. These tables must be read
together with the full text of each summary and are alone not a
complete description of the financial analyses performed by
Citigroup and Morgan Stanley. Except as otherwise noted, the
following quantitative information, to the extent that it is
based on market data, is based on market data as it existed on
or before November 18, 2006, and is not necessarily
indicative of current or future market conditions.
In connection with its analysis, Citigroup and Morgan Stanley
calculated the per share implied merger
consideration for each Phelps Dodge common share pursuant
to the merger agreement, which provides for the payment of
$88.00 in cash consideration and 0.67 shares of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock for each Phelps Dodge common
share. Based on the closing price per share of Freeport-McMoRan
common stock on November 16, 2006, which was $56.16, the
implied merger consideration as of November 16, 2006, was
$125.63, which was the sum of $88.00 plus $37.63 (the product of
0.67 multiplied by $56.16).
Phelps
Dodge Historical Share Price Analysis
To provide background information and perspective with respect
to the historical share prices of Phelps Dodge common shares,
Citigroup and Morgan Stanley reviewed the share price
performance of Phelps Dodge during the
52-week
period ending on November 16, 2006.
Citigroup and Morgan Stanley noted that the range of low and
high trading prices of Phelps Dodge common shares during the
52-week
period ended on November 16, 2006 was approximately $62.00
and $104.00. Citigroup and Morgan Stanley noted that Phelps
Dodges closing share price on November 16, 2006 was
$94.88. Citigroup and Morgan Stanley also noted that the implied
merger consideration as of November 16, 2006 was $125.63.
Phelps
Dodge Wall Street Equity Research Analyst Price
Targets
Citigroup and Morgan Stanley reviewed publicly available price
target estimates for Phelps Dodge common shares published by
Wall Street equity research analysts.
62
Citigroup and Morgan Stanley observed that the analyst price
targets ranged from $105.00 to $170.00 per Phelps Dodge
common share. Citigroup and Morgan Stanley also observed that
the median of such price targets was approximately
$120.00 per share. Citigroup and Morgan Stanley noted that
the implied merger consideration as of November 16, 2006
was $125.63.
Comparable
Companies Analysis
Citigroup and Morgan Stanley reviewed certain financial
information for Phelps Dodge on a stand-alone basis and compared
it to corresponding financial information, ratios and public
market multiples for the following selected publicly traded
copper companies:
|
|
|
|
|
Antofagasta plc
|
|
|
|
Aur Resources Inc.
|
|
|
|
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
|
|
|
|
Inmet Mining Corporation
|
|
|
|
Kazakhmys plc
|
|
|
|
Quadra Mining Ltd.
|
|
|
|
Southern Copper Corporation
|
Although none of the selected companies was directly comparable
to Phelps Dodge, the companies included were chosen because they
are publicly traded companies with businesses and operations
that, for purposes of analysis, may be considered similar to
certain businesses and operations of Phelps Dodge.
The financial information used by Citigroup and Morgan Stanley
for the selected comparable company analysis was based on
company filings, First Call consensus estimates and Wall Street
equity research, and for Phelps Dodge on a stand-alone basis,
company filings and First Call consensus estimates. All of the
multiples and ratios were calculated using public trading market
closing prices on November 16, 2006. Citigroup and Morgan
Stanley noted that the implied merger consideration as of
November 16, 2006 was $125.63.
For Phelps Dodge on a stand-alone basis and the selected copper
comparable companies, Citigroup and Morgan Stanley calculated
the firm value, which is the market value of common equity plus
the book value of net debt (total debt minus cash) and minority
interest, as a multiple of estimated 2007 earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA. This
analysis yielded a reference range of firm value as a multiple
of estimated 2007 EBITDA of 3.0x to 4.0x, which, when applied to
Phelps Dodge management estimates of 2007 EBITDA, implied a
reference range of share prices of approximately $87.00 to
$113.00.
For Phelps Dodge on a stand-alone basis and the selected
comparable copper companies, Citigroup and Morgan Stanley
calculated the ratio of the price per share to the estimated
2007 earnings per share, or EPS. This analysis yielded a
reference range of price per share as a multiple of estimated
2007 EPS of 6.0x to 7.0x, which, when applied to Phelps Dodge
management estimates of 2007 EPS, implied a reference range of
share prices of approximately $89.00 to $104.00.
For Phelps Dodge on a stand-alone basis and the selected
comparable copper companies, Citigroup and Morgan Stanley
calculated the firm value of each company per pound of reserves.
This analysis yielded a reference range of firm value as a
multiple of pounds of reserves of $0.20 to $0.40 which, when
applied to Phelps Dodges reserves, implied a reference
range of share prices of approximately $53.00 to $97.00.
Citigroup and Morgan Stanley selected the comparable companies
used in the comparable company analysis because their businesses
and operating profiles are reasonably similar to those of Phelps
Dodge. However, because of the inherent differences among the
businesses, operations and prospects of Phelps Dodge and the
businesses, operations and prospects of the selected comparable
companies, no comparable company is exactly the same as Phelps
Dodge. Therefore, Citigroup and Morgan Stanley believed that it
was inappropriate to, and therefore did not, rely solely on the
quantitative results of the comparable companies analysis.
Accordingly, Citigroup and Morgan Stanley made qualitative
judgments concerning differences between the financial and
operating characteristics and prospects of Phelps Dodge and the
companies included in the comparable company analysis that would
affect the public trading values of each in order to provide a
context in which to consider the results of the quantitative
analysis. These qualitative judgments related primarily to
63
the differing sizes, growth prospects, geographic location of
assets, profitability levels and business segments between
Phelps Dodge and the companies included in the comparable
company analysis and other matters, many of which are beyond
Phelps Dodges control, such as the impact of competition
on its businesses and the industry generally, industry growth
and the absence of any adverse material change in the financial
condition and prospects of Phelps Dodge or the industry or in
the financial markets in general. Mathematical analysis (such as
determining the average or median) is not in itself a meaningful
method of using peer group data.
Net
Asset Value Analysis
Citigroup and Morgan Stanley conducted a net asset value, or
NAV, analysis of Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan. The NAV
analysis determines a value by separately considering the
present value of each operating, development, exploration and
financial asset, the individual values of which are estimated
through the application of that methodology viewed as most
appropriate in the circumstances, net of obligations and
liabilities. The NAV approach adopts a prospective view in
regard to commodity prices and explicitly addresses the unique
characteristics of each major asset.
For purposes of this analysis, Citigroup and Morgan Stanley used
cash flow estimates provided by Phelps Dodge for the relevant
periods. These cash flows were prepared based on the six
different cases set forth below for price assumptions for
copper, gold and molybdenum based on estimates provided by
Phelps Dodge management, First Call and Wall Street equity
research estimates. This analysis utilized discount rates
ranging from 7% to 12%.
Copper
Price Estimates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$/lb.
|
|
2007E
|
|
|
2008E
|
|
|
2009E
|
|
|
2010E
|
|
|
2011E
|
|
|
Long Term
|
|
|
Case 1
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
Case 2
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
1.75
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
Case 3
|
|
|
2.84
|
|
|
|
2.36
|
|
|
|
1.86
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
1.15
|
|
Case 4
|
|
|
3.00
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
Case 5
|
|
|
3.26
|
|
|
|
2.95
|
|
|
|
2.45
|
|
|
|
1.95
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
Case 6
|
|
|
3.00
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
Gold
Price Estimates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$/oz.
|
|
2007E
|
|
|
2008E
|
|
|
2009E
|
|
|
2010E
|
|
|
2011E
|
|
|
Long Term
|
|
|
Case 1
|
|
$
|
450
|
|
|
$
|
350
|
|
|
$
|
350
|
|
|
$
|
400
|
|
|
$
|
400
|
|
|
$
|
400
|
|
Case 2
|
|
|
610
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
Case 3
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
Case 4
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
Case 5
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
Case 6
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
Molybdenum
Price Estimates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$/lb.
|
|
2007E
|
|
|
2008E
|
|
|
2009E
|
|
|
2010E
|
|
|
2011E
|
|
|
Long Term
|
|
|
Case 1
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
$
|
3.00
|
|
|
$
|
3.00
|
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
Case 2
|
|
|
18.50
|
|
|
|
13.50
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
Case 3
|
|
|
20.03
|
|
|
|
14.62
|
|
|
|
10.40
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
Case 4
|
|
|
23.00
|
|
|
|
18.00
|
|
|
|
12.00
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
|
Case 5
|
|
|
23.00
|
|
|
|
18.00
|
|
|
|
12.00
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
|
Case 6
|
|
|
23.00
|
|
|
|
18.00
|
|
|
|
12.00
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
12.00
|
|
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, Citigroup and Morgan
Stanley calculated for Phelps Dodge a per share net asset value
reference range of approximately $19.00 to $20.00 for Case 1;
approximately $66.00 to $70.00 for Case 2; approximately $76.00
to $80.00 for Case 3; approximately $102.00 to $108.00 for Case
64
4; approximately $114.00 to $120.00 for Case 5; and
approximately $128.00 to $137.00 for Case 6. Citigroup and
Morgan Stanley noted that the implied merger consideration was
$125.63 as of November 16, 2006.
Implied
NAV Package Value Analysis
Citigroup and Morgan Stanley derived the standalone per share
NAVs for Phelps Dodge based on the commodity price assumptions
set forth in Case 1 through Case 6 above. This analysis utilized
a discount rate of 8%. Citigroup and Morgan Stanley also derived
the implied value of the merger consideration, taking into
account the $88.00 in cash consideration and the implied NAV of
0.67 shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock for each
Phelps Dodge common share based on the commodity price
assumptions set forth in Case 1 through Case 6 above. This
analysis utilized a discount rate of 10% for Freeport-McMoRan
and of 8% for Phelps Dodge and assumed $75 million in
pre-tax synergies.
The results of this analysis are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge
|
|
|
Implied NAV of
|
|
|
|
Stand Alone NAV
|
|
|
Merger Consideration
|
|
|
Case 1
|
|
$
|
19.60
|
|
|
$
|
88.00
|
|
Case 2
|
|
|
67.50
|
|
|
|
90.15
|
|
Case 3
|
|
|
77.90
|
|
|
|
95.16
|
|
Case 4
|
|
|
104.50
|
|
|
|
110.39
|
|
Case 5
|
|
|
116.30
|
|
|
|
116.79
|
|
Case 6
|
|
|
131.50
|
|
|
|
126.81
|
|
Citigroup and Morgan Stanley observed that, based on the
different copper, gold and molybdenum price assumptions set
forth in Cases 1 through 6 above, this analysis indicated that
the implied NAV of the merger consideration is greater than the
Phelps Dodge standalone NAV in each case other than Case 6.
Precedent
Transaction Analysis
Precedent Premium Analysis. Citigroup and
Morgan Stanley conducted a precedent transactions analysis, in
which they analyzed implied purchase price premiums paid in the
following precedent transactions in the metals and mining
industry:
|
|
|
Acquirer
|
|
Target
|
|
IAM Gold Corp.
|
|
Cambior Inc.
|
Goldcorp Inc.
|
|
Glamis Gold Ltd.
|
Barrick Gold Corp.
|
|
NovaGold Resources Inc.
|
Peabody Energy Corp.
|
|
Excel Coal Ltd.
|
Tenaris SA
|
|
Maverick Tube Corp.
|
Barrick Gold Corp.
|
|
Placer Dome Inc.
|
Grupo Techint
|
|
Hylsamex SA de CV
|
Noranda Inc.
|
|
Falconbridge Ltd.
|
BHP Billiton Limited
|
|
WMC Resources Ltd.
|
Holcim Ltd.
|
|
Aggregate Industries PLC
|
Gold Fields Ltd.
|
|
Barrick Gold South Africa
|
Lundin Mining Corp.
|
|
EuroZinc Mining Corp.
|
Xstrata plc
|
|
Carbones del Cerrejon SA
|
Energi Mega Persada Tbk PT
|
|
Bumi Resources Tbk PT
|
Companhia Vale do Rio Doce SA
|
|
Caemi Mineracao e Metalurgia
|
Goldcorp Inc.
|
|
Barrick Gold-Cert Placer Dome
|
Citigroup and Morgan Stanley reviewed the precedent
transactions acquisition premiums based on the percentage
premium paid over each targets stock price one day, one
week and one month prior to public announcement of the
applicable transaction for the precedent transactions identified
above. Such transactions
65
included transactions in which the consideration was paid in
cash, stock or a mix of cash and stock. Based on this analysis,
Citigroup and Morgan Stanley derived a reference range of such
premiums of 17% to 29% to the closing price of $94.88 of Phelps
Dodge common shares as of November 16, 2006, which, when
adjusted to exclude Phelps Dodges net cash position of
$3.4 billion, was equivalent to a cash adjusted
premium range of 20% to 35%. This analysis implied a reference
range of share prices of approximately $111.00 to $122.00.
Citigroup and Morgan Stanley also derived a reference range of
such premiums of 16% to 28% to the closing price of $87.78 of
Phelps Dodge common shares as of October 10, 2006, which,
when adjusted to exclude Phelps Dodges net cash position
of $3.4 billion, was also equivalent to a cash
adjusted premium range of 20% to 35%. This analysis
implied a reference range of share prices of approximately
$102.00 to $113.00.
Citigroup and Morgan Stanley noted that the premium implied by
the merger over the Phelps Dodge closing share price as of
November 16, 2006, one week prior to that date and one
month prior to that date was 32.4%, 24.1% and 29.9%
respectively. Citigroup and Morgan Stanley also noted that when
adjusted to exclude the cash of Phelps Dodge, the premium
implied by the merger over the Phelps Dodge closing share price
as of November 16, 2006, one week prior to that date and
one month prior to that date was 39.2%, 28.8% and 36%,
respectively.
Precedent NAV Analysis. Citigroup and Morgan
Stanley also reviewed the following selected precedent base
metals transactions and calculated the purchase price in such
transactions as a multiple of the target companys NAV,
based upon company filings and Wall Street equity research
estimates:
|
|
|
Acquirer
|
|
Target
|
|
Xstrata plc
|
|
Falconbridge Ltd.
|
Companhia Vale do Rio Doce SA
|
|
Inco Ltd.
|
BHP Billiton plc
|
|
WMC Resources Ltd.
|
Pechiney S.A.
|
|
Alcan Inc.
|
Grupo Mexico S.A. de C.V.
|
|
ASARCO Inc.
|
Xstrata plc
|
|
MIM Holdings Ltd.
|
BHP Limited
|
|
Billiton Mining Co.
|
Billiton Mining Co.
|
|
Rio Algom Ltd.
|
Phelps Dodge
|
|
Cyprus Amax Minerals Co.
|
Based on such analysis, Citigroup and Morgan Stanley observed
that that median multiple for these precedent transactions was
1.2x. Citigroup and Morgan Stanley applied this multiple to the
non-cash portion of the range of NAVs for Phelps Dodge
determined using cash flow estimates provided by Phelps Dodge
for the relevant periods. These cash flows were prepared based
on the price assumptions for copper, gold and molybdenum
described in Cases 1 through 6 above under Net
Asset Value Analysis. This analysis utilized discount
rates ranging from 7% to 12%. Based upon and subject to the
foregoing, Citigroup and Morgan Stanley calculated for Phelps
Dodge a per share NAV reference range of approximately $19.00 to
$20.00 for Case 1; approximately $75.00 to $80.00 for Case 2;
approximately $88.00 to $92.00 for Case 3; approximately $119.00
to $127.00 for Case 4; approximately $133.00 to $141.00 for Case
5; and approximately $150.00 to $161.00 for Case 6. Citigroup
and Morgan Stanley noted that the implied merger consideration
was $125.63 as of November 16, 2006.
General
The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process
involving subjective judgments as to the most appropriate
methods of financial analysis and the application of those
methods to the particular facts and circumstances, and therefore
is not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or a summary
description.
Citigroup and Morgan Stanley made no attempt to assign specific
weights to particular analyses or factors considered, but rather
each made its own qualitative judgments as to the significance
and relevance of all the analyses and factors considered and
determined to give their respective fairness opinions as
described above. Selecting portions of the analyses or of the
summary set forth herein, without considering the analyses as a
whole, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the
processes underlying the respective opinions of Citigroup and
Morgan Stanley.
66
In arriving at their respective fairness determinations,
Citigroup and Morgan Stanley each separately considered the
results of all of their analyses and did not form any conclusion
as to whether any individual analysis, considered in isolation,
supported or failed to support an opinion as to fairness from a
financial point of view. Rather, Citigroup and Morgan Stanley
each made its respective determination as to fairness on the
basis of its experience and professional judgment after
considering the results of all of their analyses assessed as a
whole. In addition, each of Citigroup and Morgan Stanley may
have given various analyses and factors more or less weight than
other analyses and factors, and may have deemed various
assumptions more or less probable than other assumptions. As a
result, the ranges of valuations resulting from any particular
analysis described above should not be taken to be the view of
either Citigroup or Morgan Stanley of the actual value of Phelps
Dodge. No company or transaction referenced in the above
analyses is directly comparable to Phelps Dodge,
Freeport-McMoRan or the merger. Such comparative analyses
necessarily involve complex considerations and judgments
concerning financial and operating characteristics, market
conditions and other factors that could affect the public
trading of the selected companies or the terms of the selected
transactions.
Citigroup and Morgan Stanley prepared the analyses described
herein for purposes of providing their respective opinions to
the Phelps Dodge board of directors as to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to the holders of Phelps Dodge common
shares of the merger consideration to be received by such
holders pursuant to the merger agreement, and their opinions are
not intended to be, and do not constitute, recommendations.
These analyses do not purport to be appraisals nor do they
necessarily reflect the prices at which businesses or securities
actually may be sold. Analyses based upon forecasts of future
results are not necessarily indicative of actual future results,
which may be significantly more or less favorable than suggested
by these analyses. Because these analyses are inherently subject
to uncertainty, being based upon numerous factors or events
beyond the control of the parties or their respective advisors,
none of Phelps Dodge, Freeport-McMoRan, Citigroup, Morgan
Stanley or any other person assumes responsibility if future
results are materially different from those forecast.
As described above, each of the respective opinions of Citigroup
and Morgan Stanley to the Phelps Dodge board of directors was
one of a number of factors taken into consideration by the
Phelps Dodge board of directors in making its determination to
unanimously approve the merger and the transactions contemplated
by the merger agreement. Consequently, the analyses as described
above should not be viewed as determinative of the opinion of
the Phelps Dodge board of directors with respect to the merger
consideration or of whether the Phelps Dodge board of directors
would have been willing to agree to a different merger
consideration. For a further discussion of the factors the
Phelps Dodge board of directors considered, see The
Transaction Phelps Dodges Reasons for the
Transaction; Recommendation of the Phelps Dodge Board of
Directors beginning on page 44 of this document.
Citigroup and Morgan Stanley were not asked to, and did not,
recommend the specific consideration payable in the merger,
which consideration was determined through negotiations between
Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan, or that any specific merger
consideration constituted the only appropriate merger
consideration for the merger. The summary contained herein does
not purport to be a complete description of the analyses
performed by Citigroup and Morgan Stanley in connection with
their respective fairness opinions and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the written opinion of Citigroup and
the written opinion of Morgan Stanley attached as Appendices D
and E, respectively.
Phelps Dodge selected Citigroup and Morgan Stanley as its
financial advisors in connection with the merger based on their
qualifications, experience and reputation, their familiarity
with Phelps Dodge and the significance of the merger for Phelps
Dodge and the holders of shares of Phelps Dodge common shares.
Citigroup and Morgan Stanley are internationally recognized
investment banking firms and are regularly engaged in the
valuation of businesses and securities in connection with
mergers and acquisitions, leveraged buyouts, negotiated
underwritings, competitive biddings, secondary distributions of
listed and unlisted securities, private placements and
valuations for corporate and other purposes.
Pursuant to the terms of engagement letters between Phelps Dodge
and each of Citigroup and Morgan Stanley, Phelps Dodge has
agreed to pay to each of Citigroup and Morgan Stanley a
transaction fee upon consummation of the merger equal to 0.15%
of the aggregate value of the merger consideration and of Phelps
Dodge indebtedness for borrowed money or guarantees thereof
outstanding as of the closing date of the merger or directly or
indirectly assumed, refinanced, extinguished or consolidated
upon consummation of the merger. In addition, Phelps Dodge has
agreed to reimburse each of Citigroup and Morgan Stanley,
respectively, for its
67
reasonable expenses incurred in connection with its engagement,
including reasonable attorneys fees and disbursements, and
to indemnify each of Citigroup and Morgan Stanley against
specific liabilities and expenses relating to or arising out of
its engagement, including liabilities under the federal
securities laws.
THE
MERGER AGREEMENT
General
The following is a summary of the material terms of the merger
agreement. This summary does not purport to describe all the
terms of the merger agreement and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to the complete merger agreement, which is attached
as Appendix A to this document. We urge you to read the
merger agreement carefully and in its entirety.
Structure
of the Merger
Under the terms of the proposed merger, Panther Acquisition
Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Freeport-McMoRan, will
merge with and into Phelps Dodge. As a result, Phelps Dodge will
continue as a surviving corporation and will become a wholly
owned subsidiary of Freeport-McMoRan. Accordingly, Phelps Dodge
shares will no longer be publicly traded.
Merger
Consideration
Each Phelps Dodge common share outstanding immediately prior to
the effective time will be converted into the right to receive a
combination of 0.67 of a share of Freeport-McMoRan common stock
and $88.00 in cash, without interest. Phelps Dodge shareholders
will receive cash in lieu of any fractional shares of
Freeport-McMoRan
common stock that would have otherwise been issued at the
completion of the transaction. Any Phelps Dodge common shares
held by Phelps Dodge as treasury stock or held by
Freeport-McMoRan will be canceled without any payment for those
shares.
Exchange
of Shares
Prior to the effective time of the merger, Freeport-McMoRan will
appoint an exchange agent reasonably satisfactory to Phelps
Dodge for the purpose of exchanging for the merger consideration
(i) certificates representing Phelps Dodge common shares
and (ii) uncertificated Phelps Dodge common shares. As
needed, Freeport-McMoRan will make available to the exchange
agent the merger consideration to be paid in respect of the
certificates and the uncertificated shares.
Promptly after the effective time, each record holder of Phelps
Dodge common shares will be sent a letter of transmittal and
instructions on how to surrender such shares. Thereafter, in
order to receive the merger consideration in respect of any
Phelps Dodge common shares, holders of such Phelps Dodge common
shares in certificated form will be required to surrender their
certificates to the exchange agent, together with a properly
completed letter of transmittal, while the exchange of
uncertificated shares will be accomplished by delivery of an
agents message to the exchange agent (or such
other evidence, if any, of transfer as the exchange agent may
reasonably request). In exchange for Phelps Dodge common shares,
holders will receive in uncertificated book-entry form (unless a
physical certificate is requested by a holder of Phelps Dodge
common shares or is otherwise required under applicable law) the
number of shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock and the cash
consideration described under Merger
Consideration. Holders of unexchanged Phelps Dodge common
shares will not be entitled to receive any dividends or other
distributions payable by Freeport-McMoRan with respect to those
shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock constituting part of the
merger consideration, or cash in lieu of fractional shares,
until the applicable Phelps Dodge certificate is surrendered or
the applicable Phelps Dodge uncertificated share is transferred.
Upon surrender or transfer, those holders will receive
accumulated dividends and distributions, without interest,
together with cash in lieu of fractional shares.
Fractional
Shares
Freeport-McMoRan will not issue fractional shares in the
transaction. All fractional shares of Freeport-McMoRan common
stock that a holder of Phelps Dodge common shares would
otherwise be entitled to receive as a result of the transaction
will be aggregated. For the fractional share that results from
the
68
aggregation of fractional shares, the exchange agent will pay
the holder an amount in cash, without interest, equal to the
fraction of a share of Freeport-McMoRan common stock to which
such holder would have otherwise been entitled multiplied by the
closing sale price of a share of Freeport-McMoRan common stock
on the New York Stock Exchange on the trading day immediately
preceding the effective time.
Phelps
Dodge Stock Options and Other Stock-Based Awards
Except as otherwise provided below, at the effective time, each
outstanding option to purchase Phelps Dodge common shares under
any employee stock option or compensation plan, or arrangement
of Phelps Dodge, collectively referred to in this document as
Phelps Dodge stock options, whether or not exercisable or
vested, will be adjusted as necessary to provide that each
Phelps Dodge stock option outstanding immediately prior to the
effective time will be deemed to constitute a fully vested
option to acquire, on the same terms and conditions, other than
vesting, as were applicable under such Phelps Dodge stock
option, the number of shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock
equal to the product of (i) the number of Phelps Dodge
common shares subject to such Phelps Dodge stock option
immediately prior to the effective time multiplied by
(ii) the stock option exchange ratio. The stock option
exchange ratio shall mean the sum of 0.67 plus the quotient of
(a) $88.00 divided by (b) the closing price of a share
of Freeport-McMoRan common stock on the New York Stock Exchange
on the trading day immediately preceding the effective time. The
exercise price per share of Freeport-McMoRan common stock
subject to any such adjusted option will be an amount (rounded
up to the nearest one hundredth of a cent) equal to the quotient
of (i) the exercise price per Phelps Dodge common share
subject to such Phelps Dodge stock option immediately prior to
the effective time divided by (ii) the stock option
exchange ratio, subject to certain adjustments. Any Phelps Dodge
stock options, adjusted as described in this paragraph, are
collectively referred to in this document as adjusted options.
Phelps Dodge has agreed, by a waiver letter dated
February 8, 2007, that stock options granted as part of
Phelps Dodges annual award program on February 6,
2007 will not vest upon the closing of the merger. Instead,
such options will generally vest in equal installments on each
of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant, in
accordance with Phelps Dodges usual practices. However,
such options will become fully vested if the grantee incurs a
qualifying termination within two years of the
closing of this transaction or retires.
Each outstanding restricted share awarded to a Phelps Dodge
employee shall be converted into a right to receive
0.67 shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock and $88.00 in
cash. Generally, each such restricted share that is outstanding
as of the effective time will vest as of the closing of the
transaction. Restricted shares awarded as part of Phelps
Dodges annual award program on February 6, 2007 will
not vest upon the closing of the merger but contain provisions
that will accelerate the vesting for any such employee who
retires or whose employment is involuntarily terminated within
one year of the closing (or within two years, in the case of any
executive who incurs a qualifying termination under
a
change-of-control
agreement).
The members of the Phelps Dodge board of directors participate
in Phelps Dodges 1997 and 2007 Directors Stock Unit Plans,
which award deferred stock units to directors as part of their
compensation. Upon the effective time of the merger, all
deferred stock units will be cashed out based on the fair market
value of Phelps Dodges common shares immediately prior to
the effective time.
Freeport-McMoRan
Board of Directors
At the effective time, the Freeport-McMoRan board of directors
will be increased to sixteen directors, three of whom will be
independent directors from the Phelps Dodge board of directors
as of November 18, 2006. Prior to the effective time,
Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge will agree on the identity of
the three independent Phelps Dodge directors who will be added
to the Freeport-McMoRan board of directors. See The
Transaction Board of Directors of Freeport-McMoRan
Following the Transaction.
Representations
and Warranties
The merger agreement contains a number of substantially
reciprocal representations and warranties made by each of
Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge as to, among other things: due
incorporation and qualification; corporate authority to enter
into the contemplated transaction; required consents and filings
with government entities; absence of conflicts with
organizational documents, laws and material agreements;
69
capitalization; ownership, due incorporation and qualification
of subsidiaries; reports filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; financial
statements; disclosure information supplied for use in this
document; absence of material changes or events; absence of
undisclosed material liabilities; compliance with laws and court
orders; litigation; finders fees; opinions of financial
advisors; tax matters and tax treatment; employee benefits
plans; environmental matters; material contracts and agreements;
title to and condition of properties; mineral reserves and
resources; operational matters; insurance; intellectual
property; sales of shares of subsidiaries; and inapplicability
to the transaction of state takeover statutes and
shareholders rights agreements. Freeport-McMoRan also
makes representations and warranties relating to the sufficiency
of funds to deliver the aggregate cash consideration and the
status of its Indonesian contracts of work.
Certain of these representations and warranties are qualified as
to materiality or material adverse
effect. For purposes of the merger agreement,
material adverse effect means, with respect to
Freeport-McMoRan
or Phelps Dodge, as the case may be, any fact, change, event,
occurrence or effect that is materially adverse to the condition
(financial or otherwise), properties, assets, liabilities,
obligations (whether absolute, accrued, conditional or
otherwise), business, operations or results of operations of
such party and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, except any
such effect relating to (i) the announcement of the
execution of the merger agreement or the transactions
contemplated thereby, (ii) changes, circumstances or
conditions generally affecting the mining industry,
(iii) changes in general economic conditions in the United
States, (iv) changes in any of the principal markets served
by such partys business generally or shortages or price
changes with respect to raw materials, metal or other products
(including copper, gold and molybdenum) used or sold by that
party, (v) changes in generally applicable laws (other than
orders, judgments or decrees against such party or any of its
subsidiaries or changes having a materially disproportionate
effect on such party in comparison to other international mining
companies) or (vi) changes in generally accepted accounting
principles. A change in the trading prices of a partys
equity securities or any failure by a party to meet any internal
or published projections, forecasts or revenue or synergy or
earnings predictions by itself shall not be deemed to constitute
a material adverse effect. However, a party may
assert that any fact, change, event, occurrence or effect that
may have contributed to such change in trading prices or
projections or forecasts independently constitutes a
material adverse effect.
The representations and warranties in the merger agreement do
not survive the effective time and, as described below under
Termination, if the agreement is validly
terminated, neither party will have any liability for
inaccuracies in its representations and warranties, or otherwise
under the merger agreement, unless the termination resulted from
a partys willful failure to fulfill a condition to the
performance of the obligations of the other party or to perform
a covenant contained in the merger agreement.
Principal
Covenants
Interim Operations of Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps
Dodge. Each of Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge
has undertaken separate covenants that place restrictions on it
and its subsidiaries until either the effective time or
termination of the merger agreement. In general,
Freeport-McMoRan and its subsidiaries and Phelps Dodge and its
subsidiaries are required to conduct their respective businesses
in the ordinary course consistent with past practices and use
their respective reasonable best efforts consistent with past
practices to (i) preserve intact their present business
organizations, (ii) maintain in effect their respective
material licenses, permits and approvals, (iii) keep
available the services of their respective directors, officers
and key employees and (iv) preserve in all material
respects their respective relationships with third parties. Each
party has also agreed to certain restrictions on its and its
subsidiaries activities that are subject to exceptions
described in the merger agreement. The most significant
activities that each party has agreed not to perform, and not to
permit any of its subsidiaries to perform, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
amending the organizational documents of such party or its
subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
splitting, combining or reclassifying, or declaring, setting
aside or paying for any dividend or other distribution on, any
capital stock of such company or its subsidiaries, or redeeming,
repurchasing or otherwise acquiring any shares of capital stock
of such party or any of its subsidiaries or any other securities
thereof or any rights, warrants or options to acquire any such
shares or other securities, or amending any material term of any
outstanding security of such party or any of its subsidiaries,
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
except for (i) the cashless exercise of stock options,
(ii) payment of dividends on a pro rata basis to equity
owners, (iii) regular payment of quarterly cash dividends
not in excess of $0.20 per Phelps Dodge common share per
quarter or $0.3125 per share of Freeport-McMoRan common
stock per quarter, (iv) supplemental dividends authorized
by the board of directors of Freeport-McMoRan prior to the date
of the merger agreement or (v) the purchase of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock pursuant to any open market share
purchase program authorized by the board of directors of
Freeport-McMoRan;
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) issuing, delivering or selling, or authorizing the
issuance, delivery or sale of any shares of capital stock or
voting securities of such party or its subsidiaries, securities
convertible or exchangeable into or for such stock or
securities, options or other rights to acquire from such party
or its subsidiaries, or any obligations of such party or its
subsidiaries to issue, any such stock or securities convertible
into or exchangeable for such stock or securities other than the
issuance of shares of such partys stock upon the exercise
of stock options, the grant of equity-based awards, the issuance
of any securities of subsidiaries to such party or to other
subsidiaries of such party or, in the case of Freeport-McMoRan,
the issuance of Freeport-McMoRan stock pursuant to the
conversion of certain preferred stock or (ii) amending of
any term of any such securities other than as may be necessary
to address certain requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended;
|
|
|
|
subject to certain exceptions, incurring any capital expenditure;
|
|
|
|
acquiring any material business;
|
|
|
|
selling, leasing, licensing, assigning, encumbering or otherwise
transferring any material assets or material rights, except for
sales of inventory or obsolete equipment in the ordinary course
of business consistent with past practices;
|
|
|
|
subject to certain exceptions, making any material loans,
advances or capital contributions to, or investments in, any
other person;
|
|
|
|
creating, incurring or assuming any indebtedness for borrowed
money or guarantees other than (i) short-term borrowings in
the ordinary course of business and in amounts and on terms
consistent with past practices or (ii) in the case of
Freeport-McMoRan, in connection with the financing of the
transaction;
|
|
|
|
entering into (i) any copper hedging transactions (subject
to certain exceptions) or (ii) any other hedging
transactions other than in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice;
|
|
|
|
(i) entering into any agreement that limits or otherwise
restricts in any material respect such party, or will restrict
the combined company after the effective time of the merger, or
(ii) entering into, amending, modifying or terminating any
material contracts or otherwise waiving, releasing or assigning
any material rights, claims or benefits other than in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practices;
|
|
|
|
(i) granting or increasing severance or termination pay or
entering into any employment or deferred compensation agreement
with respect to any director, officer or employee whose annual
base salary exceeds $200,000 or amending any existing severance
pay or termination agreement, or any employment deferred
compensation or similar agreement for such person other than as
may be necessary to address requirements of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended, (ii) increasing benefits payable
under any existing severance or termination pay policies,
(iii) establishing, adopting or amending, except as
required by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, any
collective bargaining, bonus, profit-sharing, retirement,
deferred compensation, stock option, restricted stock or other
similar benefit plan or arrangement, (iv) increasing
compensation, bonus or other benefits payable to any employee of
either party or its subsidiaries, or (v) granting or making
equity-based awards, other than in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice, in the case of
Freeport-McMoRan with respect to items (i)-(v) above, and in the
case of Phelps Dodge, with respect to items (ii)-(v) above;
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
making any change in any method of accounting in any material
respect, except for such changes required by concurrent changes
in generally accepted accounting principles or
Regulation S-X
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
|
|
|
|
funding or setting aside any material funds for the purpose of
funding any pension, environmental or other contingent
liability, except as required by applicable laws or any contract
or other written agreement entered into prior to
November 18, 2006;
|
|
|
|
settling or offering or proposing to settle (i) any
material litigation, investigation, arbitration, proceedings or
other claims, (ii) any shareholder litigation or dispute or
(iii) any litigation, arbitration, proceeding or dispute
relating to the transaction; or
|
|
|
|
agreeing, resolving or committing to do any of the foregoing.
|
Shareholder Meetings and Duties to
Recommend. Subject to the exceptions described
below,
Freeport-McMoRan
has agreed to recommend the approval by Freeport-McMoRan
shareholders of the proposals to amend the Freeport-McMoRan
certificate of incorporation and to issue Freeport-McMoRan
common stock in connection with the transaction, and to call a
meeting of its shareholders for this purpose as soon as
reasonably practicable after the date of the merger agreement.
Subject to the exceptions described below, Phelps Dodge has
agreed to recommend the approval by Phelps Dodge shareholders of
the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, and to call a
meeting of its shareholders for this purpose as soon as
reasonably practicable after the date of the merger agreement.
No Solicitation. Each party has agreed that
none of that party, its subsidiaries or any of their officers,
directors, employees or other representatives will:
|
|
|
|
|
solicit, assist, initiate or take any action to facilitate or
encourage (including by way of furnishing
non-public
information or permitting any visit to any facilities or
properties of such party or any of its subsidiaries) any
inquiries, proposals or offers regarding any acquisition
proposal, which is defined below;
|
|
|
|
engage in any discussions or negotiations regarding, or provide
any confidential information with respect to, any acquisition
proposal;
|
|
|
|
withdraw, modify or qualify the approval or recommendation (or
publicly state that it intends to do so) in any manner adverse
to the other party or recommend or remain neutral with respect
to any acquisition proposal; or
|
|
|
|
accept or enter into, or publicly propose to accept or enter
into, any agreement with respect to an acquisition proposal.
|
However, each partys board of directors, directly or
indirectly through advisors, agents or other intermediaries, may:
|
|
|
|
|
make a change in recommendation subject to the terms and
conditions described below; and/or
|
|
|
|
engage in discussions or negotiations with, or provide
information to, any third party in response to a bona fide
written acquisition proposal by such third party; provided that
such board of directors has (i) determined in good faith
based on the information then available after consultation with
its financial advisors that such acquisition proposal
constitutes, or reasonably could be expected to lead to, a
superior proposal, as defined below, and (ii) received an
executed confidentiality agreement containing terms not
materially less restrictive than those contained in the
confidentiality agreement between Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps
Dodge, subject to certain exceptions.
|
Each party may take the action listed in the first bullet point
above only if (i) the acquisition proposal constitutes a
superior proposal, which is defined below, (ii) a written
notice has been provided to the other party detailing the
superior proposal together with all other supporting
documentation, (iii) at least three business days shall
have elapsed since the receipt of such written notice by the
other party, (iv) if the other party has proposed to amend
the terms of the merger agreement, and the board of directors of
such party determines in good faith that the acquisition
proposal continues to constitute a superior proposal taking into
account the amendment to the terms of the merger agreement
proposed by the other party, (v) the board of directors of
such party, after consultation with outside legal counsel,
determines in good faith that the failure
72
to take the superior proposal would be inconsistent with its
fiduciary duties under applicable law and (vi) prior to or
simultaneously with entering into an agreement relating to the
superior proposal, such party shall have terminated the merger
agreement and paid the other party the applicable termination
fee. In addition, the board of directors of either party may
change its recommendation in respect of any event, development,
circumstance or state of affairs occurring after the signing
date of the merger agreement but prior to the shareholder
meeting, if such board of directors, after consultation with
outside legal counsel, determines in good faith that the failure
to take such action would be inconsistent with its fiduciary
duties.
For purposes of the merger agreement, acquisition
proposal means, in respect of either party, other than the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, (i) any
merger, consolidation, share exchange, business combination,
amalgamation, consolidation, recapitalization, liquidation or
winding-up
in respect of such party; (ii) any sale or acquisition of
20% or more of the fair market value of the assets of such party
on a consolidated basis; (iii) any sale or acquisition of
20% or more of such partys shares of any class or rights
or interests therein or thereto; (iv) any sale of any
material interest in any material mineral properties;
(v) any similar business combination or transaction, of or
involving such party or any material subsidiary, other than with
the other party; or (vi) any proposal or offer to, or
public announcement of an intention to, do any of the foregoing
from any person other than the other party.
For purposes of the merger agreement, superior
proposal means, with respect to either party, an
unsolicited bona fide acquisition proposal made by a third party
in writing after the signing of the merger agreement:
(i) to purchase or otherwise acquire, directly or
indirectly, all of the outstanding shares of such party;
(ii) that is reasonably capable of being completed;
(iii) that any required financing to complete such
acquisition proposal is reasonably likely to be obtained;
(iv) that is not subject to any due diligence condition;
and (v) that the board of directors of such party
determines in good faith (after receipt of advice from its
financial advisors and outside legal counsel), that the terms
and conditions of the acquisition proposal would result in a
transaction more favorable to such partys shareholders
from a financial point of view than the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement (including any amendment of
the merger agreement proposed by the other party), and taking
into account the long-term value and synergies anticipated to be
realized as a result of the combination of Freeport-McMoRan and
Phelps Dodge, and that failure to recommend such acquisition
proposal to such partys shareholders would be inconsistent
with the fiduciary duties of such board of directors.
Each party has agreed to, and to cause its subsidiaries,
advisors, employees and other agents to, cease immediately and
cause to be terminated any and all existing activities,
discussions or negotiations with respect to any acquisition
proposal and to use its reasonable best efforts to cause any
such third party (or its agents or advisors) in possession of
confidential information about such party that was furnished by
or on behalf of such party to return or destroy all such
information.
Each party is required to notify the other party promptly (but
in any event within one business day) of such party (or any of
its advisors) becoming aware of any acquisition proposal or of
any request for
non-public
information relating to the party or any of its subsidiaries.
The party receiving the acquisition proposal, indication or
request is required to provide such notice orally and in writing
and to identify the third party making, and the terms and
conditions of, any such acquisition proposal (including any
amendment thereto), indication or request, and shall provide to
the other party copies of any such written proposal. The party
receiving the acquisition proposal, indication or request is
required to keep the other party promptly and reasonably
informed of the status, including any change to the material
terms, and details of any such acquisition proposal, indication
or request.
Each party will ensure that its subsidiaries, advisors,
directors, employees and other agents are aware of the
non-solicitation provisions described herein and shall be
responsible for any breach of such provisions by any of its
subsidiaries, advisors, directors, employees and other agents.
Employee Benefits Continuation. Until
December 31, 2007, Freeport-McMoRan will provide to the
employees of Phelps Dodge and its subsidiaries who are employees
as of the effective time (other than any employees represented
by a union or employee association for purposes of collective
bargaining) compensation (other than equity-based compensation)
and benefit plans substantially comparable in the aggregate to
those
73
provided to the Phelps Dodge employees immediately prior to the
effective time. Freeport-McMoRan will also continue all of the
existing retirement plans and savings plans of Phelps Dodge
until December 31, 2008.
Reasonable Best Efforts Covenant. Subject to
the terms and conditions of the merger agreement, each of
Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge has agreed to use its
reasonable best efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all
actions and to do, or cause to be done, and assist the other
party in doing, all things necessary, proper or advisable under
applicable laws and regulations to consummate the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement, including
(i) preparing and filing as promptly as practicable with
any governmental entity or other third party all documentation
to effect all necessary filings, notices, petitions, statements,
registrations, submissions of information, applications and
other documents and (ii) obtaining and maintaining all
approvals, consents, registrations, permits, authorizations and
other confirmations required to be obtained from any
governmental entity or other third party that are necessary,
proper or advisable to consummate the transactions contemplated
by the merger agreement.
Certain Other Covenants. The merger agreement
contains additional and generally reciprocal covenants,
including covenants relating to the filing of this document,
cooperation regarding filings and proceedings with governmental
entities and obtaining any governmental or other third-party
consents, waivers or approvals, public announcements, access to
information regarding each partys business prior to
completion of the transaction, notices of certain events,
matters relating to Section 16 under the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the listing on the New
York Stock Exchange of shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock
to be issued in the transaction or upon exercise of
Freeport-McMoRan stock options following the transaction.
Principal
Conditions to Completion of the Transaction
Mutual Closing Conditions. The obligations of
Freeport-McMoRan, Panther Acquisition Corporation and Phelps
Dodge to consummate the transaction are subject to the
satisfaction of the following conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
obtaining the required approvals of the Freeport-McMoRan
shareholders and Phelps Dodge shareholders (as described under
The Freeport-McMoRan Special Meeting Votes
Required and The Phelps Dodge Special
Meeting Votes Required);
|
|
|
|
absence of legal prohibitions on the completion of the
transaction;
|
|
|
|
expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period under
the HSR Act and the European Commission having taken a decision
(or being deemed to have taken a decision) declaring the merger
compatible with the common market;
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRans registration statement on
Form S-4,
which includes this document, being effective and not subject to
any Securities and Exchange Commission stop order and no
proceedings for such purpose being pending before or threatened
by the Securities and Exchange Commission;
|
|
|
|
approval for the listing on the New York Stock Exchange of the
Freeport-McMoRan common stock to be issued in the
transaction; and
|
|
|
|
receipt of all governmental consents required to permit the
consummation of the transaction, except for those the failure of
which to obtain would not reasonably be expected to have a
material adverse effect with respect to Freeport-McMoRan
following the effective time.
|
Additional Closing Conditions of
Freeport-McMoRan. In addition to the conditions
described above, the obligations of Freeport-McMoRan and Panther
Acquisition Corporation to consummate the transaction are
subject to the satisfaction of the following further conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
(i) Phelps Dodge having performed in all material respects
all of its obligations required to be performed at or prior to
the effective time, (ii) accuracy as of the effective time
of the merger of the representations and warranties made by
Phelps Dodge to the extent specified in the merger agreement,
and (iii) receipt by Freeport-McMoRan of a certificate
signed by an executive officer of Phelps Dodge to the foregoing
effect; and
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
the absence of any event, occurrence, revelation or development
of a state of circumstances or facts which, individually or in
the aggregate, has had or would reasonably be expected to have a
material adverse effect on Phelps Dodge.
|
Additional Closing Conditions of Phelps
Dodge. In addition to the conditions described
above, the obligations of Phelps Dodge to consummate the
transaction are subject to the satisfaction of the following
further conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
(i) each of Freeport-McMoRan and Panther Acquisition
Corporation having performed in all material respects all of its
obligations required to be performed at or prior to the
effective time, (ii) accuracy as of the effective time of
the merger of the representations and warranties made by
Freeport-McMoRan to the extent specified in the merger
agreement, and (iii) receipt by Phelps Dodge of a
certificate signed by an executive officer of Freeport-McMoRan
to the foregoing effect;
|
|
|
|
the absence of any event, occurrence, revelation or development
of a state of circumstances or facts which, individually or in
the aggregate, has had, or would reasonably be expected to have,
a material adverse effect on Freeport-McMoRan; and
|
|
|
|
the three directors of Phelps Dodge designated in accordance
with the merger agreement shall have been elected to serve on
the board of directors of Freeport-McMoRan effective as of the
effective time.
|
Termination
Mutual Termination Rights. The merger
agreement may be terminated at any time before the effective
time, whether before or after the receipt of the required
approvals from Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge shareholders,
in any of the following ways:
|
|
|
|
|
by mutual written agreement of Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge;
|
|
|
|
by either Freeport-McMoRan or Phelps Dodge:
|
|
|
|
|
|
if the transaction has not been consummated on or before
August 31, 2007 (which is referred to in this document as
the end date); provided that neither Freeport-McMoRan nor Phelps
Dodge may terminate the merger agreement under this clause if
the material breach of any obligation under the merger agreement
by such party has resulted in the failure of the transaction to
be consummated by the end date;
|
|
|
|
if there is any applicable law, judgment, injunction, order or
decree of any court or other governmental entity having
competent jurisdiction that makes the consummation of the
transaction illegal or if there is a final, non-appealable
injunction that enjoins Freeport-McMoRan or Phelps Dodge from
consummating the transaction; or
|
|
|
|
if Freeport-McMoRan shareholders or Phelps Dodge shareholders
fail to give the necessary approvals at their respective
shareholder meetings;
|
|
|
|
|
|
if the Phelps Dodge board of directors changes its
recommendation with respect to the transaction;
|
|
|
|
if a breach of any representation or warranty or failure to
perform any covenant or agreement on the part of Phelps Dodge
set forth in the merger agreement shall have occurred that would
cause the condition described under the first bullet point under
Principal Conditions to Completion of the
Transaction Additional Closing Conditions of
Freeport-McMoRan not to be satisfied and such condition is
incapable of being satisfied prior to the end date described
above;
|
|
|
|
if Phelps Dodge has willfully and materially breached its
obligations described under Principal
Covenants Shareholder Meetings and Duties to
Recommend or Principal
Covenants No Solicitation; or
|
|
|
|
if Freeport-McMoRan proposes to enter into a definitive
agreement with respect to a superior proposal in compliance with
the terms of the merger agreement described under
Principal Covenants No
Solicitation; provided that Freeport-McMoRan pays Phelps
Dodge the
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
termination fee described below under
Termination Fees; Other Expenses prior
to or concurrently with terminating the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
if the Freeport-McMoRan board of directors changes its
recommendation with respect to the merger;
|
|
|
|
if a breach of any representation or warranty or failure to
perform any covenant or agreement on the part of
Freeport-McMoRan set forth in the merger agreement shall have
occurred that would cause the condition described in the first
bullet point under Principal Conditions to
Completion of the Transaction Additional Closing
Conditions of Phelps Dodge not to be satisfied and such
condition is incapable of being satisfied prior to the end date
described above;
|
|
|
|
if Freeport-McMoRan has willfully and materially breached its
obligations described under Principal
Covenants Shareholder Meetings and Duties to
Recommend or Principal
Covenants No Solicitation; or
|
|
|
|
if Phelps Dodge proposes to enter into a definitive agreement
with respect to a superior proposal in compliance with the terms
of the merger agreement described under
Principal Covenants No
Solicitation; provided that Phelps Dodge pays
Freeport-McMoRan the termination fee described below under
Termination Fees; Other Expenses prior
to or concurrently with terminating the merger agreement.
|
Effect of Termination. If the merger agreement
is validly terminated, it will become void and of no effect
without any liability on the part of any party (or any
shareholder, director, officer, employee, agent, consultant or
representative of such party) unless the termination resulted
from such partys willful failure to fulfill a condition to
the performance of the obligations of the other party or to
perform a covenant contained in the merger agreement, in which
case such party will be fully liable for any and all liabilities
and damages incurred or suffered by the other party as a result
of such partys failure. However, the provisions of the
merger agreement relating to the effects of termination,
termination fees and expenses, governing law, jurisdiction and
waiver of jury trial, as well as the confidentiality agreement
entered into between
Freeport-McMoRan
and Phelps Dodge, will continue in effect notwithstanding
termination of the merger agreement.
Termination
Fees; Other Expenses
Freeport-McMoRan agrees to pay Phelps Dodge a fee of
$375 million in cash, and Phelps Dodge agrees to pay
Freeport-McMoRan a fee of $750 million in cash, if the
merger agreement is terminated by the other party as a result of
any of the following events:
|
|
|
|
|
if such party willfully and materially breached certain
obligations concerning the solicitation of alternative
transactions, its obligation to hold a shareholder meeting to
obtain the required shareholders approval or its
obligation to recommend the transaction to its shareholders;
|
|
|
|
if such partys board of directors changed its
recommendation of the transaction, unless (i) the other
party suffered a material adverse effect prior to the
shareholder meeting of the party whose board of directors
changed its recommendation and (ii) such partys board
of directors subsequently makes a change in recommendation after
determining in good faith (after receipt of advice from its
legal and financial advisors) that the failure to change its
recommendation would be inconsistent with its fiduciary
duties; or
|
|
|
|
if such party proposes to enter into a definitive agreement with
respect to a superior transaction.
|
Each party has agreed to pay the other party one-half of the
termination fee if the merger agreement is terminated because
such partys shareholders do not approve the transaction,
unless (i) the other party suffered a material adverse
effect prior to the shareholder meeting of the party whose
shareholders do not approve the transaction and (ii) such
partys board of directors subsequently makes a change in
recommendation after determining in good faith (after receipt of
advice from its legal and financial advisors) that the failure
to change its recommendation would be inconsistent with its
fiduciary duties.
76
In addition, each party has agreed to pay the other party the
termination fee (or, if one-half of the termination fee was
previously paid as described above, the remainder of the
termination fee) if each of the following occurs:
|
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement is terminated because the transaction was
not completed by August 31, 2007, or such partys
shareholders do not approve the transaction (except in
circumstances in which one-half of the
break-up fee
was not payable as described above);
|
|
|
|
a proposal for an alternative transaction has been made prior to
the end date or the shareholder meeting as applicable; and
|
|
|
|
within 12 months following the termination, that party
completes or enters into an agreement providing for an
alternative transaction.
|
Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge must each reimburse the other
party for transaction expenses up to $40 million in the
aggregate if the merger agreement is terminated because such
party incurably breached its representations, warranties or
covenants.
Amendments;
Waivers
Any provision of the merger agreement may be amended or waived
prior to the effective time if, but only if, the amendment or
waiver is in writing and is signed, in the case of an amendment,
by each party to the merger agreement, or, in the case of a
waiver, by each party against whom the waiver is to be
effective, except that, after the required approval of the
holders of
662/3%
of the outstanding Phelps Dodge common shares, no amendment or
waiver may be made unless permitted by New York law.
INTERESTS
OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN THE TRANSACTION
Freeport-McMoRan
Certain members of Freeport-McMoRan management and its board of
directors may be deemed to have interests in the transaction
that are in addition to, or different from, the interests of
other Freeport-McMoRan shareholders. The Freeport-McMoRan board
of directors was aware of these interests and considered them,
among other matters, in approving the transaction and the merger
agreement. These interests are described below.
Compensation, Incentive Plans and other
Agreements. The transaction does not trigger any
payments under
change-in-control
agreements in place between Freeport-McMoRan and certain of its
senior executives or trigger any acceleration of any stock-based
awards granted to any of Freeport-McMoRans employees. No
executive or other employee of Freeport-McMoRan will receive any
special bonus or other payments related solely to the successful
completion of the transaction.
As a result of the transaction, the size of the Freeport-McMoRan
annual incentive pool, in which executive officers of
Freeport-McMoRan participate, may increase. The Freeport-McMoRan
annual incentive plan provides that if the moving five-year
average return on investment exceeds 6%, participants receive a
percentage of an award pool up to 2.5% of net cash flow from
operations, which could be increased to a maximum amount of
2.75% if safety performance measures are exceeded for a given
year.
Freeport-McMoRans
executive officers participate in this plan. The transaction is
expected to increase Freeport-McMoRans 2007 net cash
flow from operations, which could increase the award pool under
the annual incentive plan. The corporate personnel committee of
the Freeport-McMoRan board of directors, which is composed of
four independent directors, administers the annual incentive
plan. Pursuant to the plan, the committee selects the
participants, who must be officers of Freeport-McMoRan or any of
its subsidiaries. The annual incentive plan provides that the
committee may award less than the award pool for a given year
and gives the committee discretion to reduce or eliminate the
amount of a participants award.
Security Ownership of Officers and
Directors. For information concerning security
ownership of directors and certain officers of Freeport-McMoRan,
see Freeport-McMoRans proxy statement used in connection
with its 2006 annual meeting of shareholders, the relevant
portions of which are incorporated by reference in this document
from Freeport-McMoRans annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005.
77
Board Compensation. For information concerning
Freeport-McMoRans compensation policy for members of the
board of directors, see Freeport-McMoRans proxy statement
used in connection with its 2006 annual meeting of shareholders,
the relevant portions of which are incorporated by reference in
this document from Freeport-McMoRans annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Phelps
Dodge
All of Phelps Dodges executive officers (except Arthur
Miele, who has attained his normal retirement age and is
entitled to full vesting effective December 31, 2006 of all
of his outstanding equity awards on account of his announced
retirement) and all of the members of the Phelps Dodge board of
directors have interests in the transaction that are in addition
to their interests as shareholders of Phelps Dodge. The Phelps
Dodge board of directors was aware of these interests and
considered them, among other matters, in approving the
transaction and the merger agreement. These interests are
described below.
The exact number of equity-based awards owned by the executive
officers and directors, as well as the consideration to be
received in respect of such equity-based awards, will be
determined conclusively on the last trading day immediately
preceding the effective time of the merger. Therefore, the exact
number of equity-based awards may be different from Phelps
Dodges estimate to the extent that (i) the number of
Phelps Dodge common shares and equity-based awards outstanding
at such time are different from the number assumed in Phelps
Dodges estimates because of the permitted events described
below,
and/or
(ii) the closing price of shares of Freeport-McMoRan common
stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the last trading day
immediately preceding the effective time of the merger is
different from the closing price assumed in Phelps Dodges
estimate. However, with respect to clause (i) above, Phelps
Dodge expects that the number of
stock-based
awards will not increase materially as Phelps Dodge does not
currently have plans to issue any shares of its common stock
prior to the effective time of the merger other than in
connection with the exercise of stock options outstanding as of
the date hereof and other than pursuant to grants of
equity-based awards in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice.
Restricted Stock. All of Phelps Dodges
executive officers hold shares of Phelps Dodge restricted stock.
In accordance with the terms of the applicable stock incentive
plan, the terms of the restricted stock and the merger
agreement, each share of Phelps Dodge restricted stock
outstanding that, as of February 5, 2007, is held by each
of the executive officers listed below will vest at the
effective time and be converted into the right to receive 0.67
fully vested shares of
Freeport-McMoRan
common stock and $88.00 in cash. It is currently estimated that,
as of the effective time of the merger, the following executive
officers will hold the following number of unvested Phelps Dodge
restricted shares that will convert, at the effective time, into
the right to receive the number of shares of Freeport-McMoRan
common stock and cash identified below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Unvested
|
|
|
Vested Shares of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Restricted Shares
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
J. Steven Whisler
|
|
|
213,388
|
|
|
|
142,970
|
|
|
$
|
18,778,144
|
|
Timothy R. Snider
|
|
|
71,278
|
|
|
|
47,756
|
|
|
$
|
6,272,464
|
|
Ramiro G. Peru
|
|
|
67,360
|
|
|
|
45,131
|
|
|
$
|
5,927,680
|
|
S. David Colton
|
|
|
24,855
|
|
|
|
16,653
|
|
|
$
|
2,187,240
|
|
David C. Naccarati
|
|
|
14,925
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,313,400
|
|
Nancy F. Mailhot
|
|
|
12,405
|
|
|
|
8,311
|
|
|
$
|
1,091,640
|
|
Restricted stock awarded to the executive officers as part of
Phelps Dodges annual award program on February 6,
2007 will not vest upon the closing of the merger but contain
provisions that will accelerate the vesting for any such
executive officer who retires or incurs a qualifying
termination under a
change-of-control
agreement within two years of the closing. The number of shares
of restricted stock awarded are as follows: J. Steven
Whisler, 0; Timothy R. Snider, 7,000; Ramiro G. Peru,
5,000; S. David Colton, 3,000; David C. Naccarati,
2,500; and Nancy F. Mailhot, 2,500.
Stock Options. All of Phelps Dodges
executive officers hold Phelps Dodge stock options. Except as
otherwise provided below, in accordance with the terms of the
applicable stock incentive plan, the terms of the
78
options and the merger agreement, at the effective time of the
merger, each outstanding Phelps Dodge stock option, whether or
not exercisable or vested, will be adjusted as necessary to
provide that each Phelps Dodge stock option outstanding
immediately prior to the effective time of the merger will be
deemed to constitute a fully vested option to acquire shares of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock, on the same terms and conditions,
other than vesting, as were applicable under such Phelps Dodge
stock option. The number of shares of Freeport-McMoRan common
stock subject to any adjusted option will equal the product of
(i) the number of Phelps Dodge common shares subject to
such Phelps Dodge stock option immediately prior to the
effective time multiplied by (ii) the stock option exchange
ratio.
It is currently estimated that, as of the effective time of the
merger, the following executive officers will hold the following
number of unvested Phelps Dodge stock options that will vest at
the effective time, will receive the following number of fully
vested adjusted Freeport-McMoRan options and will have unvested
Phelps Dodge options with the following values:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Phelps
|
|
|
Estimated Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dodge Common
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan
|
|
|
Estimated Value of
|
|
|
|
Shares Subject
|
|
|
Common Shares Subject
|
|
|
Unvested Phelps
|
|
Name
|
|
to Unvested Options
|
|
|
to Adjusted Options(1)
|
|
|
Dodge Options(2)
|
|
|
J. Steven Whisler
|
|
|
55,667
|
|
|
|
128,607
|
|
|
$
|
3,275,010
|
|
Timothy R. Snider
|
|
|
19,467
|
|
|
|
44,974
|
|
|
$
|
1,184,139
|
|
Ramiro G. Peru
|
|
|
14,934
|
|
|
|
34,502
|
|
|
$
|
877,368
|
|
S. David Colton
|
|
|
9,201
|
|
|
|
21,257
|
|
|
$
|
545,481
|
|
David C. Naccarati
|
|
|
7,201
|
|
|
|
16,636
|
|
|
$
|
406,131
|
|
Nancy F. Mailhot
|
|
|
3,601
|
|
|
|
8,319
|
|
|
$
|
182,493
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The estimated number of shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock
subject to adjusted options was calculated based on the number
of unvested Phelps Dodge stock options outstanding as of
February 5, 2007 and assuming that the fair market value of
such Freeport-McMoRan common stock at the effective time is
equal to $53.65 a share, which was the closing price of a share
of Freeport-McMoRan common stock on the New York Stock Exchange
on February 9, 2007. The actual number of shares of
Freeport-McMoRan
common stock subject to adjusted options will differ based on
the number of unvested Phelps Dodge options outstanding, and the
actual fair market value of a share of Freeport-McMoRan common
stock, in each case as of the effective time of the merger. |
|
(2) |
|
The estimated value of the unvested Phelps Dodge options was
calculated based on the number of unvested Phelps Dodge options
outstanding as of February 5, 2007, the exercise prices of
such unvested options and the estimated merger consideration,
which was calculated assuming that the fair market value of the
Freeport-McMoRan common stock at the effective time is equal to
$53.65 a share, which was the closing price of a share of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock on the New York Stock Exchange as
of February 9, 2007. Calculated in this manner, the
estimated merger consideration exceeded the fair market value of
Phelps Dodge common shares as of February 9, 2007. The
actual value of the unvested adjusted options will differ based
on the number of unvested Phelps Dodge stock options outstanding
and the actual fair market value of a share of Freeport-McMoRan
common stock as of the effective time. |
On February 6, 2007, as part of Phelps Dodges annual
award program, the executive officers were granted additional
stock options, which, under the terms of the merger agreement,
would have vested upon the closing of the proposed merger.
However, Phelps Dodge has agreed, by a waiver letter dated
February 8, 2007, that those stock options will not vest
upon closing, but instead will generally vest in equal
installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the
date of grant, in accordance with Phelps Dodges usual
practices. However, such options will become fully vested if
the grantee incurs a qualifying termination within
two years of the closing of this transaction or retires. The
number of shares subject to stock options granted to the
following executive officers on February 6, 2007 are as
follows: J. Steven Whisler, 0; Timothy R. Snider,
11,500; Ramiro G. Peru, 8,000; S. David Colton, 5,000;
David C. Naccarati, 4,000; and Nancy F. Mailhot, 4,000.
For more information regarding the treatment of Phelps Dodge
stock options, see The Merger Agreement Phelps
Dodge Stock Options and Other Stock-Based Awards on
page 69.
79
Cash Bonus. Under the terms of Phelps
Dodges shareholder-approved Executive Performance
Incentive Plan (the EPIP), Phelps Dodges
Compensation and Management Development Committee (the
Compensation Committee) has the authority to award
earned bonuses in the form of cash and/or shares of restricted
stock. Had the merger agreement not been entered into, the
Compensation Committee was expected to award a substantial
portion of each executive officers bonus earned for 2006
services in the form of restricted stock. Instead, the
Compensation Committee elected to exercise its discretion under
the EPIP to pay Mr. Whisler a $3,000,000 bonus award for
2006 entirely in cash. The Compensation Committee made this
decision in light of the performance of Phelps Dodge and
Mr. Whisler in 2006, including his efforts in facilitating
the proposed transaction for the benefit of shareholders, and
the expectation that he will not continue in employment
following the effective time.
Existing Employment and
Change-of-Control
Severance Agreements. Phelps Dodge has
change-of-control
agreements with the seven members of its senior management team,
including its five named executive officers. The agreements for
each of these officers will be triggered by the transaction,
except with respect to Mr. Miele who had announced his
retirement from Phelps Dodge prior to the execution of the
merger agreement. Pursuant to these agreements, each affected
executive will receive, in the event he or she ceases to be
employed within two years following consummation of this
transaction (for a reason other than death, disability, willful
misconduct, or under certain circumstances a voluntary
termination of employment by the executive), the following
benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
payment of all salary, reimbursement, bonus and other cash
benefits accrued through the date of termination or resignation;
|
|
|
|
a termination payment within ten days from the date of such
termination or resignation three times the sum of (x) the
officers highest annual base salary during the three
calendar years ending with the year of termination and
(y) target annual bonus, less any payments received under
any severance agreement;
|
|
|
|
continuation of health, medical, vision and dental benefits and
long-term disability and life insurance coverage, executive
physical and financial counseling for 36 months from the
date of such termination or resignation;
|
|
|
|
payment under the Phelps Dodge Annual Incentive Compensation
Plan of at least a pro-rated bonus for the year in which the
transaction is completed;
|
|
|
|
outplacement services up to a maximum of 15% of annual base
salary; and
|
|
|
|
gross-up
payments for golden parachute excise taxes (if any).
|
These executives also have a
30-day
window period beginning immediately after the first anniversary
date of the change of control to voluntarily terminate their
employment and receive the benefits described above. Assuming
that a qualifying termination of each of the following officers
occurred immediately following the effective time of the merger
entitling them to receive benefits under these agreements on
account of such termination, it is currently estimated that each
would receive a termination payment (exclusive of any excise tax
gross-up
benefit payable) in the following approximate amount:
J. Steven Whisler, $5,785,500; Timothy R. Snider,
$3,007,470; Ramiro G. Peru, $2,617,830; S. David
Colton, $1,713,600; David C. Naccarati, $1,656,000; and
Nancy F. Mailhot, $1,464,750.
Supplemental Retirement Plan. All of Phelps
Dodges executive officers participate in the Phelps Dodge
Corporation Supplemental Retirement Plan, which is referred to
in this document as the SRP. The SRP provides an additional
36 months of service credit to any executive, regardless of
his or her age and service, who is entitled to receive
termination benefits under his or her
change-of-control
agreement. In addition, benefits paid under the SRP to
participants entitled to receive termination benefits under the
applicable
change-of-control
agreements will be paid in the form of an actuarially equivalent
lump sum. The SRP also provides for the payment of unreduced
benefits to an executive who is entitled to receive termination
benefits under a
change-of-control
agreement with Phelps Dodge and who, at the time of his or her
termination, completed 15 years of service and attained
age 55, or whose age and service, when added together,
total at least 80. The aggregate incremental present value of
the SRP benefits payable to each of the following executive
officers on account of the
change-of-control
provisions in the SRP, calculated using the discount rates and
actuarial assumptions referenced in the SRP, are: J. Steven
Whisler, $14,014,000; Timothy R. Snider,
80
$3,336,000; Ramiro G. Peru, $5,329,000; S. David
Colton, $327,000; David C. Naccarati, $212,000; and
Nancy F. Mailhot, $93,000.
Split Dollar Arrangements. All of Phelps
Dodges executive officers are parties to agreements that
provide the executives with company-paid split-dollar life
insurance. Upon a qualifying termination following the
consummation of the transaction, a member of Phelps Dodges
senior management team would become entitled to the full cash
surrender value of the underlying policy, unreduced by the value
of any prior premium payments made by the company. Pursuant to
his or her
change-of-control
agreement a member of the senior management team would also
become entitled to three years of additional premium payments.
Each of the following executives, who would not otherwise be
entitled to receive a transfer of the applicable policies,
having not qualified for an unreduced pension benefit, would
receive the ownership of a split-dollar life insurance policy,
which as of November 8, 2006 has the estimated value
identified below, provided that his or her employment is
terminated with an entitlement to receive termination benefits
under the applicable
change-of-control
agreement following the effective time of the merger: J. Steven
Whisler, $218,499; Timothy R. Snider, $155,781; Ramiro G.
Peru, $159,559; S. David Colton, $68,564; David C. Naccarati,
$117,923; and Nancy F. Mailhot, $21,632.
Supplemental Savings Plan. All of Phelps
Dodges executive officers also participate in Phelps
Dodges Supplemental Savings Plan, which is required to be
fully funded by Phelps Dodge prior to the effective time of the
merger. No incremental benefits would be payable to any
executive officer by reason of the funding of these obligations.
Other Payments to Executives. Kalidas
Madhavpeddi, former senior vice president Asia, will
receive an accelerated payment of $1 million shortly
following the consummation of the transaction, pursuant to the
terms of his separation agreement.
Directors Stock Unit Plan. Certain members of
the Phelps Dodge board of directors participate in Phelps
Dodges 1998 and 2007 Directors Stock Unit Plans,
which award deferred stock units to directors as part of their
compensation. Upon the effective time of the merger, all
deferred stock units will be cashed out based on the fair market
value of Phelps Dodges common shares immediately prior to
the effective time of the merger. As of February 9, 2007,
Phelps Dodge directors collectively have approximately
97,554 stock units outstanding under this Plan, and the
aggregate cash-out value of such stock units is approximately
$11,896,710, based on the February 9, 2007 closing price of
a Phelps Dodge common share on the New York Stock Exchange.
Upon consummation of the transaction, each of Phelps
Dodges then current non-employee directors will be
considered to have retired for purposes of certain standard
board compensation arrangements. As a result, Phelps Dodge will
continue to provide each of these directors for life $25,000 in
term life insurance coverage. In addition, all of Phelps
Dodges directors will have the opportunity to participate
in Phelps Dodges charitable matching gift program, which
currently has a limit for each director of $10,000 per year.
Insurance
and Indemnification
The merger agreement provides that, for six years following
completion of the transaction:
|
|
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge as the surviving corporation of the merger shall,
and Freeport-McMoRan will cause Phelps Dodge to, indemnify and
hold harmless the present and former officers and directors of
Phelps Dodge, in each case in respect of acts and omissions
occurring at or prior to completion of the transaction
(including in connection with the approval of the merger
agreement and the consummation of the transaction) to the
fullest extent permitted by applicable law or provided under the
Phelps Dodge certificate of incorporation and bylaws in effect
on the date of the signing of the merger agreement; provided
that such indemnification shall be subject to any limitation
imposed from time to time under applicable law; and
|
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge as the surviving corporation of the merger shall,
for six years after the effective time, provide directors
and officers liability insurance in respect of acts or
omissions occurring prior to the completion of the transaction
covering the present and former officers and directors of Phelps
Dodge currently covered by the Phelps Dodge officers and
directors liability insurance policy on terms with respect
to coverage and amount no less favorable than those of such
policy in effect on the date hereof.
|
81
ACCOUNTING
TREATMENT
The transaction will be accounted for as a purchase by
Freeport-McMoRan under accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States. Under the purchase method of accounting,
the assets and liabilities of Phelps Dodge will be recorded, as
of completion of the transaction, at their respective fair
values and added to those of Freeport-McMoRan. The financial
condition and results of operations of Freeport-McMoRan after
completion of the transaction will reflect Phelps Dodges
balances and results after completion of the transaction but
will not be restated retroactively to reflect the historical
financial position or results of operations of Phelps Dodge.
Following the completion of the transaction, the earnings of the
combined company will reflect purchase accounting adjustments,
including the effect of changes in the cost bases for assets and
liabilities on production costs and depreciation, depletion and
amortization expense. Long-lived assets will be evaluated for
impairment when events or changes in economic circumstances
indicate the carrying amount of such assets may not be
recoverable. Metal inventories will be subject to periodic
assessments for
lower-of-cost-or-market
adjustments. The goodwill resulting from the transaction, which
is not subject to amortization, will be reviewed for impairment
at least annually. Any future impairments or market value
adjustments would reduce the asset carrying values and result in
charges to earnings for the combined company.
MATERIAL
UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX
CONSIDERATIONS OF THE TRANSACTION
The following is a discussion of the material U.S. federal
income tax considerations relating to the transaction. This
discussion is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, the Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder and
administrative and judicial interpretations thereof, all as in
effect on the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, and all
of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive
effect, or to different interpretation. This discussion assumes
that U.S. Holders and
Non-U.S. Holders
(as such terms are defined below) of Phelps Dodge common shares
hold such common shares as capital assets as of the effective
time of the merger. This discussion does not address all aspects
of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to a
U.S. Holder or
Non-U.S. Holder
in light of their particular circumstances. In particular, this
discussion does not address all of the tax considerations that
may be relevant to certain Phelps Dodge shareholders that are
subject to special treatment under U.S. federal income tax
laws, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
financial institutions or insurance companies;
|
|
|
|
tax-exempt entities;
|
|
|
|
dealers in securities or currencies;
|
|
|
|
regulated investment companies;
|
|
|
|
real estate investment trusts;
|
|
|
|
traders in securities that elect to use a
mark-to-market
method of accounting for their securities holdings;
|
|
|
|
persons holding Phelps Dodge common shares as part of a hedge,
appreciated financial position, straddle, or conversion or
integrated transaction;
|
|
|
|
persons who acquired Phelps Dodge common shares pursuant to the
exercise of compensatory options or otherwise as compensation;
|
|
|
|
persons liable for the alternative minimum tax;
|
|
|
|
investors in pass-through entities;
|
|
|
|
U.S. Holders whose functional currency is not
the U.S. dollar; or
|
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Holders
who actually or constructively own or have owned, at any time
during the five-year period up to and including the effective
time, more than a 5% equity interest in Phelps Dodge.
|
If an entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal
income tax purposes holds Phelps Dodge common shares, the tax
treatment of the partnership and its partner will generally
depend on the status and activities of
82
the partnership and its partners. A partner of a partnership
holding Phelps Dodge common shares should consult its own tax
advisors.
This discussion of material U.S. federal income tax
considerations relating to the transaction is not a complete
analysis or description of all potential tax consequences of the
transaction and does not address any state, local or
non-U.S. tax
consequences of the transaction. We strongly urge each Phelps
Dodge shareholder to consult its own tax advisor with respect to
the U.S. federal income tax considerations relating to the
transaction in light of its own particular circumstances, as
well as the effect of any state, local,
non-U.S. and
other tax laws.
Consequences
of the Transaction to U.S. Holders
For purposes of this discussion, a U.S. Holder
is a beneficial owner of Phelps Dodge common shares that is, for
U.S. federal income tax purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
an individual citizen or resident of the United States;
|
|
|
|
a corporation created or organized in or under the laws of the
United States or of any political subdivision thereof;
|
|
|
|
an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal
income taxation regardless of its source; or
|
|
|
|
a trust if it (i) is subject to the primary supervision of
a court within the United States and one or more
U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial
decisions of the trust, or (ii) has a valid election in
effect under applicable Treasury regulations to be treated as a
U.S. person.
|
The receipt of the merger consideration by a U.S. Holder in
exchange for Phelps Dodge common shares pursuant to the
transaction will be a taxable transaction for U.S. federal
income tax purposes. In general, a U.S. Holder that
receives the merger consideration in exchange for Phelps Dodge
common shares pursuant to the transaction will recognize capital
gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes equal to
the difference, if any, between (i) the fair market value
of the Freeport-McMoRan common stock as of the effective time of
the merger and the cash received and (ii) the
U.S. holders adjusted tax basis in the Phelps Dodge
common shares exchanged for the merger consideration pursuant to
the transaction. Any such gain or loss would be long-term
capital gain or loss if the holding period for the Phelps Dodge
common shares exceeded one year. Long-term capital gains of a
non-corporate U.S. Holder generally are taxable at a
maximum rate of 15%. Capital gains of a corporate
U.S. Holder generally are taxable at the regular tax rates
applicable to corporations.
A U.S. Holders aggregate tax basis in
Freeport-McMoRan common stock received in the transaction will
equal the fair market value of such stock as of the effective
time of the merger. The holding period of the Freeport-McMoRan
common stock received in the transaction will begin on the day
after the transaction is completed.
Consequences
of the Transaction to
Non-U.S. Holders
For purposes of this discussion, a
Non-U.S. Holder
is a beneficial owner of Phelps Dodge common shares that is
neither a U.S. Holder nor an entity treated as
a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
A
Non-U.S. Holder
that receives the merger consideration in exchange for Phelps
Dodge common shares pursuant to the transaction will recognize
capital gain to the same extent that a U.S. Holder will
recognize gain as described above under the heading
Consequences of the Transaction to
U.S. Holders. However, any gain a
Non-U.S. Holder
recognizes will generally not be subject to U.S. federal
income tax, unless:
|
|
|
|
|
the
Non-U.S. Holder
is an individual who is present in the United States for
183 days or more in the taxable year of the transaction,
and certain other requirements are met, or
|
|
|
|
such gain is effectively connected with such
Non-U.S. Holders
trade or business in the United States, or, if certain tax
treaties apply, is attributable to such
Non-U.S. Holders
U.S. permanent establishment.
|
83
If the
Non-U.S. Holder
is described in the first bullet point above, it will be subject
to a flat 30% tax on any gain recognized, which may be offset by
U.S. source capital losses. If the
Non-U.S. Holder
is described in the second bullet point above, it will be
subject to tax on its gain at applicable U.S. federal
income tax rates and, in addition, may be subject to a branch
profits tax (if it is a corporation) equal to 30% (or lesser
rate under an applicable income tax treaty) on its effectively
connected earnings and profits for the taxable year, which would
include such gain.
Information
Reporting and Backup Withholding
Information returns will be filed with the IRS in connection
with cash paid and stock delivered pursuant to the transaction.
Backup withholding may apply to payments made to
U.S. Holders and
Non-U.S. Holders
in connection with the transaction. Backup withholding will not
apply, however, to a U.S. Holder that provides a correct
taxpayer identification number and certifies that it is not
subject to backup withholding on the substitute
Form W-9
(or appropriate successor form) included in the letter of
transmittal to be delivered to the Phelps Dodge shareholders
following completion of the transaction, or is otherwise exempt
from backup withholding. In the case of a
Non-U.S. Holder,
backup withholding will not apply if the
Non-U.S. Holder
provides a certification of foreign status on the applicable IRS
Form W-8
(or appropriate successor form). Any amount withheld under the
backup withholding rules will be allowed as a refund or a credit
against applicable U.S. federal income tax liability,
provided the required information is furnished to the IRS. The
IRS may impose a penalty upon any taxpayer that fails to provide
the correct taxpayer identification number.
DESCRIPTION
OF FREEPORT-MCMORAN CAPITAL STOCK
The following summary of the terms of the capital stock of
Freeport-McMoRan is not meant to be complete and is qualified by
reference to the relevant provisions of the General Corporation
Law of the State of Delaware and the Freeport-McMoRan
certificate of incorporation and bylaws. Copies of the
Freeport-McMoRan
certificate of incorporation and bylaws are incorporated by
reference and will be sent to holders of shares of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock upon request. See Where You
Can Find More Information below.
Authorized
Capital Stock
Prior to Completion of the Transaction. Under
the Freeport-McMoRan certificate of incorporation,
Freeport-McMoRan authorized capital stock consists of
423,600,000 shares of Class B common stock,
$0.10 par value per share, and 50,000,000 shares of
preferred stock, $0.10 par value per share. Of the
Class B common stock, as of November 10, 2006,
22,658,130 shares were authorized for issuance upon
conversion of the preferred shares, 229,053 shares were
authorized for issuance upon conversion of the
7% Convertible Senior Notes due 2011, 5,681,248 shares
were authorized for issuance upon exercise of employee stock
options (of which 488,123 were exercisable) and
531,573 shares were authorized for issuance upon the
vesting of employee restricted stock units. In addition, as of
November 10, 2006, Freeport-McMoRan also had 142,593 stock
appreciation rights outstanding (of which 126,203 were
exercisable) that will be settled in cash upon exercise and
67,965 shares of phantom stock outstanding that will be
settled in cash. As of November 10, 2006, there were issued
and outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
196,942,871 shares of Class B common stock (not
counting the 112,961,136 shares held in
Freeport-McMoRans
treasury); and
|
|
|
|
1,099,985 shares of
51/2% Convertible
Perpetual Preferred Stock.
|
If approved by the shareholders, the Freeport-McMoRan
certificate of incorporation will be amended to increase the
authorized number of shares of Freeport-McMoRan capital stock to
750,000,000 and to increase the authorized number of shares of
Class B common stock to 700,000,000. See
Amendment of the Freeport-McMoRan certificate
of incorporation (Item 1 on Freeport-McMoRans proxy
card) below.
In 2002, Freeport-McMoRan amended its certificate of
incorporation to reclassify its Class A common stock and
Class B common stock into a single class designated as
Class B common stock. As a result,
84
Freeport-McMoRan does not have any Class A common stock. If
the proposal to amend the
Freeport-McMoRan
certificate of incorporation is approved by the shareholders,
all references to Class B common stock in the
Freeport-McMoRan certificate of incorporation will be amended to
refer only to common stock and, in addition, the
provisions and references to the previously designated classes
of preferred stock (other than the Series A Participating
Cumulative Preferred Stock as discussed below in
The Freeport-McMoRan Rights Agreement
and the
51/2%
Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock), of which no shares are
outstanding, will be deleted.
Description
of Common Stock
Common Stock Outstanding. The outstanding
shares of common stock are, and the shares of common stock
issued and delivered pursuant to the merger agreement will be,
duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable,
and not subject to any preemptive or other similar right.
Voting Rights. Holders of common stock are
entitled to elect all of the authorized number of members of the
Freeport-McMoRan board of directors, excluding those directors
that holders of preferred stock have the exclusive right to
elect if Freeport-McMoRan fails to make specified dividend
payments. Each share of common stock has one vote. With respect
to all other matters submitted to a vote of Freeport-McMoRan
shareholders, except as required by law, the holders of the
common stock vote together as a single class, and record holders
have one vote per share.
Dividend Rights; Rights upon
Liquidation. Holders of the common stock will
share ratably in any cash dividend that may from time to time be
declared by the Freeport-McMoRan board of directors. In the
event of a voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or
winding up of Freeport-McMoRan, prior to any distributions to
the holders of the common stock, the holders of the
Freeport-McMoRan preferred stock will receive any payments to
which they are entitled. Subsequent to those payments, the
holders of the common stock will share ratably, according to the
number of shares held by them, in Freeport-McMoRans
remaining assets, if any.
Other Rights. Shares of common stock are not
redeemable and have no subscription, conversion or preemptive
rights.
Transfer Agent. The transfer agent and
registrar for the common stock is Mellon Investor Services LLC.
The
Freeport-McMoRan Rights Agreement
The Freeport-McMoRan Rights Agreement is designed to deter
abusive takeover tactics and to encourage prospective acquirors
to negotiate with the Freeport-McMoRan board of directors rather
than attempt to acquire the company in a manner or on terms that
the board deems unacceptable. Under the
Freeport-McMoRan
Rights Agreement, each outstanding share of common stock
includes an associated preferred stock purchase right. If the
rights become exercisable, each right will entitle its holder to
purchase one
one-hundredth
(1/100) of a share of Freeport-McMoRan Series A
Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock at an exercise price of
$60 per unit, subject to adjustment. The rights trade with
all outstanding shares of the common stock. The rights will
separate from the common stock and become exercisable upon the
earlier of:
|
|
|
|
|
the tenth day following a public announcement that a person or
group of affiliated or associated persons has acquired
beneficial ownership of 20% or more of outstanding
Freeport-McMoRan common stock, referred to as an acquiring
person; or
|
|
|
|
the tenth business day, or any later date as determined by the
Freeport-McMoRan board of directors prior to the time that any
person or group becomes an acquiring person, following the
commencement of or announcement of an intention to make a tender
offer or exchange offer that, if consummated, would result in
the person or group becoming an acquiring person.
|
Term of Rights. The rights will expire on
May 16, 2010, unless Freeport-McMoRan extends this date or
redeems or exchanges the rights as described below.
85
Exercise After Someone Becomes An Acquiring
Person. After any person or group becomes an
acquiring person, each holder of a right will be entitled to
receive upon exercise that number of shares of the common stock
having a market value of two times the exercise price of the
right. However, this right will not apply to an acquiring
person, whose rights will be void.
Upon the occurrence of certain events after someone becomes an
acquiring person, each holder of a right, other than the
acquiring person, will be entitled to receive, upon exercise of
the right, common stock of the acquiring company having a market
value equal to two times the exercise price of the right. These
rights will arise only if after a person or group becomes an
acquiring person:
|
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan is acquired in a merger or other business
combination; or
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan sells or otherwise transfers 50% or more of its
assets or earning power.
|
Adjustment. The exercise price, the number of
rights outstanding and the number of preferred shares issuable
upon exercise of the rights are subject to adjustment from time
to time to prevent certain types of dilution. Freeport-McMoRan
will not issue fractional preferred stock shares. Instead,
Freeport-McMoRan will make a cash adjustment based on the market
price of the preferred stock prior to the date of exercise.
Rights, Preferences, and Limitations of
Rights. Preferred stock purchasable upon exercise
of the rights will not be redeemable. Each share of preferred
stock will entitle the holder to receive a preferential
quarterly dividend payment of the greater of $1.00 or 100 times
the dividend declared per share of the common stock. In the
event of liquidation, the holders of each share of preferred
stock will be entitled to a preferential liquidation payment of
the greater of $0.10 per share or 100 times the payment
made per share of the common stock. Each share of
Freeport-McMoRan preferred stock will entitle the holder to 100
votes and will vote together with the common stock. Finally, in
the event of any merger, consolidation or other transaction in
which the common stock is exchanged, each share of the preferred
stock will entitle the holder to receive 100 times the
amount received per share of the common stock. These rights are
protected by customary antidilution provisions. Because of the
nature of the Freeport-McMoRan preferred stocks dividend,
liquidation and voting rights, the value of each one
one-hundredth interest in a share of preferred stock should
approximate the value of one share of the common stock.
Exchange and Redemption. After a person or
group becomes an acquiring person, Freeport-McMoRan may exchange
the rights, in whole or in part, at an exchange ratio, subject
to adjustment, of one share of common stock, or one
one-hundredth of a share of preferred stock, per right.
Freeport-McMoRan generally may not make an exchange after any
person or group becomes the beneficial owner of 50% or more of
the common stock.
Freeport-McMoRan may redeem the rights in whole, but not in
part, at a price of $0.01 per right, subject to adjustment,
at any time prior to any person or group becoming an acquiring
person. The redemption of the rights may be made effective at
such time, on such basis and with such conditions as the
Freeport-McMoRan board of directors in its sole discretion may
establish. Once redeemed, the rights will terminate immediately,
and the only right of the rights holders will be to receive the
cash redemption price.
Amendments. Freeport-McMoRan may amend the
terms of the rights without the consent of the rights holders,
including an amendment to lower the thresholds described above.
However, after any person or group becomes an acquiring person,
Freeport-McMoRan may not amend the terms of the rights in any
way that adversely affects the interests of the rights holders.
Amendment
of the Freeport-McMoRan certificate of incorporation
(Item 1 on Freeport-McMoRans proxy card)
At the Freeport-McMoRan special meeting, holders of the
Class B common stock will be asked to approve the amendment
of the Freeport-McMoRan certificate of incorporation, which will
increase the number of authorized shares of Freeport-McMoRan
capital stock to 750,000,000 and increase the authorized number
of shares of Class B common stock to 700,000,000, and to
approve the issuance of common stock in the transaction. If the
proposal to amend the Freeport-McMoRan certificate of
incorporation is approved by the
86
shareholders, the Class B common stock will be
renamed common stock and the provisions and
references to the previously designated classes of preferred
stock (other than the Series A Participating Cumulative
Preferred Stock), of which no shares are outstanding, will be
deleted.
To complete the transaction, Freeport-McMoRan expects that
approximately 137 million shares of Freeport-McMoRan common
stock will be issued to Phelps Dodge shareholders in the
transaction, based on the number of Phelps Dodge common shares,
restricted shares and stock options outstanding on
September 30, 2006, and assuming that all of the Phelps
Dodge stock options are exercised prior to the completion of the
transaction.
Although the amount of Class B common stock currently
authorized under the Freeport-McMoRan certificate of
incorporation will be sufficient to complete the transaction,
Freeport-McMoRan believes that it is desirable to have
additional shares available for other corporate purposes,
including stock incentive plans and possible future issuances of
equity or equity-linked securities. At present, Freeport-McMoRan
has no plans to issue shares of common stock for any other
purpose; however, Freeport-McMoRan may issue equity or
equity-linked
securities to refinance a portion of the debt incurred to
finance the transaction. Under some circumstances, it is also
possible to use unissued shares of common stock for antitakeover
purposes, but Freeport-McMoRan has no present intention to take
this action. We therefore ask Freeport-McMoRan shareholders to
approve the amendment, which will change Article 4 of the
Freeport-McMoRan certificate of incorporation to increase the
number of authorized shares of Class B common stock to
700,000,000.
Whether any future issuance of shares unrelated to the
transaction would be submitted for a shareholder vote depends
upon the nature of the issuance, legal and stock exchange
requirements, and the judgment of the Freeport-McMoRan board of
directors at the time.
Listing
of Freeport-McMoRan Common Stock
It is a condition to the completion of the transaction that the
shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock to be issued in the
transaction be approved for listing on the New York Stock
Exchange, subject to official notice of issuance.
COMPARISON
OF SHAREHOLDERS RIGHTS
The following table describes the rights, prior to the
transaction, of Freeport-McMoRan shareholders under Delaware
law, the Freeport-McMoRan certificate of incorporation and the
Freeport-McMoRan bylaws and the rights of Phelps Dodge
shareholders under New York law, the Phelps Dodge certificate of
incorporation and the Phelps Dodge bylaws. The rights of
Freeport-McMoRan shareholders prior to the transaction are the
same as the rights Phelps Dodge shareholders will have following
the transaction. Copies of the Freeport-McMoRan certificate of
incorporation and the Freeport-McMoRan bylaws will be sent to
holders of shares of Phelps Dodge upon request. See Where
You Can Find More Information beginning on page 120.
You should refer to these documents and to the applicable
provisions of Delaware law and New York law for a complete
description of the rights of Freeport-McMoRan shareholders and
Phelps Dodge shareholders prior to the completion of the
transaction and Freeport-McMoRan shareholders following
completion of the transaction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan Shareholder Rights
|
|
Phelps Dodge Shareholder Rights
|
|
General:
|
|
The rights of Freeport-McMoRan
shareholders are currently governed by Delaware law, the
Freeport-McMoRan certificate of incorporation and
Freeport-McMoRan
bylaws.
|
|
The rights of Phelps Dodge
shareholders are currently governed by New York law, the Phelps
Dodge certificate of incorporation and Phelps Dodge bylaws.
|
Authorized Capital
Stock:
|
|
The authorized capital stock of
Freeport-McMoRan is currently 473.6 million shares,
consisting of 423.6 million shares of common
|
|
The authorized capital stock of
Phelps Dodge is currently 306 million shares, consisting of
300 million common shares
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan Shareholder Rights
|
|
Phelps Dodge Shareholder Rights
|
|
|
|
stock and 50 million shares
of preferred stock, of which 1,100,000 shares are
designated
51/2% Convertible
Perpetual Preferred Stock and 2,500,000 are designated
Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock. Both the
Class B common stock and the preferred stock have a par
value of $0.10 per share.
|
|
having a par value of
$6.25 per share and six million shares of preferred stock
having a par value of $1.00 per share of which 400,000 are
designated Junior Participating Cumulative Preferred Shares.
|
|
|
At the special meeting, holders of
the common stock will be asked to increase the authorized number
of shares of Freeport-McMoRan capital stock to 750,000,000,
increase the authorized number of shares of Class B common
stock to 700,000,000, change references to the
Class B Common Stock to common
stock and delete the provisions and references to the
previously designated classes and series of preferred stock of
which no shares are outstanding (other than the provisions
relating to the Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred
Stock, which shall remain).
|
|
|
Number of
Directors:
|
|
The Freeport-McMoRan certificate
of incorporation provides that the number of Freeport-McMoRan
directors shall be determined by resolution of the board of
directors, but in no event shall be less than five. The board of
directors may increase the number of directors, and any
newly-created directorships so created may be filled by the
board of directors.
There are currently thirteen members of the
Freeport-McMoRan
board of directors.
Under the merger agreement, Freeport- McMoRan has agreed to
(i) increase the number of the members of the board of
directors to sixteen and (ii) cause three current
independent members of the Phelps Dodge board of directors to be
appointed to the Freeport-McMoRan board of
|
|
The Phelps Dodge certificate of
incorporation and bylaws provide that the number of directors
shall not be less than nine nor more than twelve, provided
that whenever the holders of any one or more series of
preferred shares of Phelps Dodge become entitled to elect one or
more directors to the board of directors under the Phelps Dodge
certificate of incorporation, such maximum number of directors
shall be increased automatically by the number of directors such
holders are so entitled to elect. Such increase shall remain in
effect until the right of such holders to elect such director or
directors shall cease and until the director or directors
elected by such holders shall no longer hold office.
There are currently twelve members of the Phelps Dodge board of
directors.
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan Shareholder Rights
|
|
Phelps Dodge Shareholder Rights
|
|
|
|
directors at the closing of the
transaction (the identity of such three individuals to be agreed
upon by Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge prior to the closing).
|
|
|
Classification of Board of
Directors:
|
|
In May 2003, Freeport-McMoRan
amended its certificate of incorporation to phase out the
classified structure of the board under which one of three
classes of directors was elected each year to serve three-year
staggered terms. The phase-out of the classified structure was
completed in 2006. As a result, all of Freeport-McMoRans
directors are elected annually to one- year terms.
|
|
Except as provided in the Phelps
Dodge certificate of incorporation relating to the preferred
shares, the Phelps Dodge bylaws provide that the Phelps Dodge
board of directors shall be divided into three classes, each
consisting, as nearly as may be possible, of
one-third of
the total number of directors. The terms of office of one class
of directors expires each year, resulting in each class serving
a staggered three-year term.
|
Vacancies on the Board of
Directors:
|
|
The Freeport-McMoRan certificate
of incorporation provides that a vacancy in the board of
directors shall be filled by vote of holders of common stock and
holders of voting preferred stock. Any vacancy in the office of
a director may also be filled by the vote of the majority of the
remaining directors, regardless of any quorum requirements set
out in the bylaws. The board of directors may increase the
number of directors and any newly-created directorship may be
filled by the board.
Subject to the rights to elect directors under specified
circumstances as may be granted to the holders of shares of
preferred stock, a director elected to fill a vacancy shall hold
office until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until
his or her successor is elected and qualified.
|
|
Except as otherwise provided in
the Phelps Dodge certificate of incorporation relating to the
preferred shares, newly created directorships resulting from an
increase in the number of directors and vacancies occurring on
the board of directors for any reason may be filled by vote of
the directors (including a majority of directors then in office
if less than a quorum exists).
Any director elected by the board of directors to fill a newly
created directorship or a vacancy shall hold office until the
next annual meeting of shareholders and until his successor,
classified in accordance with these bylaws, has been elected and
qualified.
The Phelps Dodge certificate of incorporation provides that a
vacancy caused by the death or resignation of a director who
shall have been elected by the holders of preferred shares as a
class may be filled only by the holders of outstanding preferred
shares at a meeting called for such purpose.
|
Removal of
Directors:
|
|
The Freeport-McMoRan certificate
of incorporation provides that any director may be removed, with
cause, by a vote of the holders of
|
|
Except as provided below relating
to the directors elected by the holders of the preferred shares,
the Phelps Dodge certificate of
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan Shareholder Rights
|
|
Phelps Dodge Shareholder Rights
|
|
|
|
common stock and the holders of
voting preferred stock, voting together.
|
|
incorporation provides that no
director may be removed without cause by Phelps Dodge
shareholders.
|
Board Quorum and
Action:
|
|
The Freeport-McMoRan bylaws
provide that a majority of the total number of the board members
shall constitute a quorum at all meetings. In the event that one
or more of the directors shall be disqualified to vote at any
meeting, then the quorum shall be reduced by one for each such
director, provided that in no case shall fewer than one-third of
the number of directors constitute a quorum. In the case of a
vote by the board of directors to fill a vacancy, the
Freeport-McMoRan certificate of incorporation provides that any
vacancy in the office of a director may be filled by the vote of
a majority of the remaining directors.
|
|
The Phelps Dodge bylaws provide
that one-third, but in any event not fewer than five members of
the board of directors, shall constitute a quorum for
transacting business at all meetings. In the event of a quorum
not being present, a lesser number may adjourn the meeting to a
time not more than twenty days later.
|
|
|
The vote of a majority of those
present at any meeting at which a quorum is present shall be
sufficient to take any action, unless a different vote is
specified by law or the Freeport-McMoRan certificate of
incorporation or the Freeport-McMoRan bylaws.
|
|
|
Shareholders
Quorum:
|
|
The Freeport-McMoRan bylaws
provide that a majority of the shares issued and outstanding and
entitled to vote, present in person or represented by proxy,
shall constitute a quorum.
|
|
The Phelps Dodge bylaws provide
that at any meeting of shareholders, unless otherwise provided
by law, the holders of shares (of any class) aggregating a
majority of the total number of shares of all classes of Phelps
Dodge then issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the
meeting, present in person or represented by proxy, shall
constitute a quorum, provided that, unless otherwise
provided by law or by the Phelps Dodge certificate of
incorporation, when a specified item of business is required to
be voted on by any one or more of a particular class or series
of shares, voting as a separate class, the holders of a majority
of the shares so eligible to vote as a separate class shall
constitute a quorum for
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan Shareholder Rights
|
|
Phelps Dodge Shareholder Rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
the transaction of such specified
item of business.
|
|
|
|
|
The shareholders present at any
duly organized meeting may continue to transact business until
adjournment, notwithstanding the withdrawal of sufficient
shareholders to constitute the remaining shareholders of less
than a quorum. Whether or not a quorum is present at a meeting,
the person presiding at the meeting or the holders of a majority
of the shares of all classes of Phelps Dodge entitled to vote at
the meeting so present or represented may adjourn the meeting
from time to time. At any such adjourned meeting at which a
quorum shall be present, any business may be transacted which
might have been transacted at the meeting as originally called.
|
Vote Required for Certain
Corporate Actions:
|
|
The Freeport-McMoRan certificate
of incorporation provides that the affirmative vote of the
holders of not less than
662/3%
of the outstanding shares of common stock shall be required for
the approval or authorization of any business combination;
provided, however, that the
662/3%
voting requirement shall not be applicable if:
the Freeport-McMoRan board of directors by
affirmative vote which shall include not less than a majority of
the entire number of directors not affiliates with an interested
party in the business combination (i) has approved in
advance the acquisition of those outstanding shares of common
stock which caused the interested party to become an interested
party or (ii) has approved the business combination;
|
|
Under New York law, a corporation
incorporated prior to February 23, 1998, that does not opt
out in its certificate of incorporation must obtain the
affirmative vote of at least
662/3%
of its outstanding voting stock in order to approve a plan of
merger or consolidation. Phelps Dodge has not opted out of this
provision.
|
|
|
the business
combination is solely between Freeport-McMoRan and one or more
other corporations all of the
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan Shareholder Rights
|
|
Phelps Dodge Shareholder Rights
|
|
|
|
common stock of each of which
other corporations is owned directly or indirectly by the
corporation or between two or more of such other corporations;
or
|
|
|
|
|
the business
combination is a merger or consolidation and the cash
and/or fair
market value of the property, securities or other consideration
to be received per share by holders of common stock in the
business combination is at least equal to the highest price per
share (after giving effect to appropriate adjustments for any
recapitalizations and for any stock splits, stock dividends and
like distributions) paid by the interested party in acquiring
any shares of common stock on the date when last acquired or
during a period of two years prior thereto.
|
|
|
|
|
The affirmative vote of the
holders of
662/3%
or more of the shares of the outstanding common stock shall be
required to amend or repeal, or adopt any provisions
inconsistent with, the above requirements relating to business
combinations.
|
|
|
Shareholder Action by Written
Consent:
|
|
The Freeport-McMoRan bylaws
provide that any action required or permitted to be taken at any
annual or special meeting of shareholders may be taken without a
meeting, without prior notice and without a vote, if a consent
in writing, setting forth the action so taken, shall be signed
by shareholders having not less than a minimum number of votes
that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a
meeting at which all shares entitled to vote thereon were
present and voted. Prompt notice of the taking of the corporate
action without a meeting by less than unanimous written consent
shall be given to those
|
|
The Phelps Dodge certificate of
incorporation and bylaws are silent as to shareholder action by
written consent.
New York law provides that shareholder action may be taken
without a meeting upon the written consent of the holders of all
outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon.
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan Shareholder Rights
|
|
Phelps Dodge Shareholder Rights
|
|
|
|
shareholders who have not
consented in writing.
|
|
|
Amendment of Certificate of
Incorporation:
|
|
The Freeport-McMoRan certificate
of incorporation provides that Freeport- McMoRan reserves the
right to amend the certificate of incorporation in the manner
prescribed by statute and that all shareholder rights are
granted subject to this reservation. In the event of an
amendment which shall increase or decrease the authorized stock
of any class, the Freeport-McMoRan certificate of incorporation
provides that any such increase or decrease may be adopted by
the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of common stock irrespective of the
provisions of Section 242(b)(2) of Delaware General
Corporation Law.
Under Delaware law, an amendment to the certificate of
incorporation requires that the corporations board of
directors adopt an amending resolution, which resolution must be
approved by holders of a majority of the outstanding stock
entitled to vote. However, Delaware law provides that, if
provided in the original certificate of incorporation, the
number of authorized shares of any such class of stock may be
increased or decreased (but not below the number of shares
thereof then outstanding) by the affirmative vote of the holders
of a majority of the stock of the corporation entitled to vote
in any amendment which created such class of stock or which was
adopted prior to the issuance of any shares of such class of
stock, or in any amendment thereto which was authorized by a
resolution adopted by the affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of such class of stock.
|
|
The Phelps Dodge certificate of
incorporation provides that the board of directors may from time
to time amend any of the provisions of any certificate of
amendment establishing any series of preferred shares, subject
to any class voting rights of the holders of such shares and
subject to the requirements of the laws of the State of New
York.
New York law provides that amendment of or change to the
certificate of incorporation may be authorized by vote of the
board, followed by vote of a majority of all outstanding shares
entitled to vote thereon at a meeting of shareholders;
provided that, whenever the certificate of incorporation
requires action by the board of directors, by the holders of any
class or series of shares, or by the holders of any other
securities having voting power by the vote of a greater number
or proportion than is required by New York law, the provision of
the certificate of incorporation requiring such greater vote
shall apply; and provided further that an amendment to
the certificate of incorporation for the purpose of reducing the
requisite vote by the holders of any class or series of shares
or by the holders of any other securities having voting power
that is otherwise provided for in any section of the applicable
New York law that would otherwise require more than a majority
of the votes of all outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon
shall not be adopted except by the vote of such holders of class
or series of shares or by such holders of such other securities
having voting power that is at least equal to that which would
be required to take the action under New York law.
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan Shareholder Rights
|
|
Phelps Dodge Shareholder Rights
|
|
Amendment of
Bylaws:
|
|
The Freeport-McMoRan certificate
of incorporation expressly authorizes the board of directors to
adopt, amend or repeal the bylaws in any manner not inconsistent
with Delaware law or the Freeport-McMoRan certificate of
incorporation, subject to the power of the shareholders to
adopt, amend or repeal the bylaws or to limit or restrict the
power of the board of directors to adopt, amend or repeal the
bylaws.
The Freeport-McMoRan bylaws provide that the bylaws may be
altered, amended, changed or repealed by a vote of the
shareholders or at any meeting of the board of directors by the
vote of a majority of the directors present or as otherwise
provided by statute.
|
|
The Phelps Dodge bylaws provide
that, with the exception of certain limitations on Phelps
Dodges dealings in its own shares or in the shares of its
subsidiaries, the bylaws may be amended or repealed by a vote of
a majority of all of the directors at any regular or special
meeting of the board of directors.
New York law provides that the bylaws may also be amended or
repealed by a majority of the votes cast by the holders of
shares then entitled to vote in the election of any directors.
Furthermore, any bylaw adopted by the board of directors may be
amended or repealed by the shareholders entitled to vote thereon
as described above.
|
Voting
Stock:
|
|
The outstanding voting securities
of Freeport-McMoRan are its common stock.
The Freeport-McMoRan certificate of incorporation provides that
each share of common stock and each share of voting preferred
stock shall have one vote in the election of directors.
Freeport- McMoRan currently has no voting preferred stock
outstanding. However, except as otherwise required by law and
except for such voting powers with respect to the election of
directors as are provided for the existing preferred stock or as
may be stated in the resolution or resolutions of the board of
directors providing for the issue of any series of preferred
stock, the holders of any such series of preferred stock shall
have no voting power whatsoever.
|
|
The outstanding voting securities
of Phelps Dodge are its common shares.
The Phelps Dodge bylaws provide that each shareholder entitled
to vote at a meeting of shareholders shall be entitled to one
vote, in person or by proxy, for each share having voting power
held by him or her on the record date for such meeting, as
appears on the books of Phelps Dodge.
|
Dividends and Repurchase of
Shares:
|
|
Delaware law provides that
corporations may pay dividends out of surplus or, if there is no
surplus, out of net profits for the fiscal year in which the
dividend is declared and for the preceding fiscal year. Delaware
corporate law also provides that dividends
|
|
New York law provides that
dividends may be declared, distributed or paid out by the
corporation on outstanding shares except as restricted by the
certificate of incorporation, or unless the corporation is
insolvent or the distribution would make the
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan Shareholder Rights
|
|
Phelps Dodge Shareholder Rights
|
|
|
|
may not be paid out of net
profits if, after the payment of the dividend, capital is less
than the capital represented by the outstanding stock of all
classes having a preference upon the distribution of assets.
The Freeport-McMoRan certificate of incorporation provides that
the Freeport- McMoRan board of directors is expressly
authorized, at any time or from time to time, to divide any or
all of the shares of the preferred stock into series, and in the
resolution or resolutions establishing a particular series,
before issuance of any of the shares, to fix and determine the
powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating,
optional or other rights, and any qualifications, limitations or
restrictions, of the series so established, to the fullest
extent permitted by the laws of the State of Delaware.
The Freeport-McMoRan certificate of incorporation provides that
the holders of the common stock are entitled to receive
dividends out of assets legally available at such times and in
such per share amounts as the board of directors may from time
to time determine.
|
|
corporation insolvent. The
corporation generally can only make the distributions out of
surplus. The net assets of the corporation upon declaration or
distribution must remain at least equal to the amount of the
corporations stated capital.
The Phelps Dodge certificate of incorporation provides that,
pursuant to the general authority vested in the board of
directors, but not in limitation of the powers conferred on the
board of directors within the certificate of incorporation and
by the laws of the State of New York, the board of directors is
expressly authorized to determine with respect to each series of
preferred shares, the rate or amount and times at which, and the
preferences and conditions under which, dividends shall be
payable on the preferred shares, the status of such dividends as
cumulative or non- cumulative, the date or dates from which
dividends, if cumulative, shall accumulate, and the status of
such shares as participating or non-participating after the
payment of dividends as to which such shares are entitled to any
preference, as well as the limitations, if any, applicable while
the preferred shares are outstanding on the payment of dividends
or making of distributions on, or the acquisition or redemption
of, common shares or any other class of share ranking junior,
either as to dividends or upon liquidation, to the shares of
such series.
|
Limitation of Liability and
Indemnification of Directors and
Officers:
|
|
The Freeport-McMoRan certificate
of incorporation provides that:
Directors shall not be liable to
Freeport-McMoRan or its shareholders for monetary damages for
breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability (i)
for any breach of a directors duty of loyalty to
Freeport-McMoRan or its
|
|
The Phelps Dodge bylaws provide
that:
Phelps Dodge shall indemnify any person made, or
threatened to be made, a party to an action or proceeding other
than one by or in the right of Phelps Dodge to procure a
judgment in its favor, whether civil or criminal, including an
action by or in the
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan Shareholder Rights
|
|
Phelps Dodge Shareholder Rights
|
|
|
|
shareholders, (ii) for
acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional
misconduct or a knowing violation of the law, (iii) under
Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or
(iv) for any transaction from which the director derived
an improper personal benefit.
Freeport-McMoRan shall indemnify any person who
is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of Freeport-
McMoRan, or is or was serving at the request of Freeport-McMoRan
as a director, officer, employee or agent of another
corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other
enterprise, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.
The determination as to whether such person has met the standard
required for indemnification shall be made in accordance with
applicable law.
Expenses incurred by such a director, officer,
employee or agent in defending a civil or criminal action, suit
or proceeding shall be paid by Freeport-McMoRan in advance of
the final disposition of such action, suit or proceeding upon
receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of such person to
repay such amount if it shall ultimately be determined that he
is not entitled to be indemnified by Freeport-McMoRan.
The provision of indemnification by the
Freeport-McMoRan certificate of incorporation shall be deemed to
be a contract between Freeport-McMoRan and each person who
serves as such director, officer, employee or agent of Freeport-
McMoRan in
|
|
right of any other corporation of
any type or kind, domestic or foreign, or any partnership, joint
venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise, which
any director or officer of Phelps Dodge served in any capacity
at the request of Phelps Dodge, by reason of the fact that he,
his testator or intestate, is or was a director or officer of
Phelps Dodge, or is or was serving such other corporation,
partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or
other enterprise in any capacity, against judgments, fines,
amounts paid in settlement and expenses (including
attorneys fees) incurred in connection with such action or
proceeding, or any appeal therein, provided that no
indemnification may be made to or on behalf of such person if
(i) his acts were committed in bad faith or were the
result of his active and deliberate dishonesty and were material
to such action or proceeding or (ii) he personally gained
a financial profit or other advantage to which he was not
legally entitled.
Phelps Dodge shall indemnify any person made,
or threatened to be made, a party to an action by or in the
right of Phelps Dodge to procure a judgment in its favor by
reason of the fact that he, his testator or intestate, is or was
a director or officer of Phelps Dodge, or is or was serving at
the request of Phelps Dodge as a director or officer of any
other corporation of any type or kind, domestic or foreign, or
of any partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan
or other enterprise, against judgments, amounts paid
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan Shareholder Rights
|
|
Phelps Dodge Shareholder Rights
|
|
|
|
any such capacity at any time. No
repeal or modification of the provisions relating to
indemnification nor, to the fullest extent permitted by law, any
modification of law, shall adversely affect any right or
protection of a director, officer, employee or agent of
Freeport-McMoRan existing at the time of such repeal or
modification.
The indemnification provided by the Freeport-McMoRan
certificate of incorporation shall not be deemed exclusive of
any other rights to which those seeking indemnification may be
entitled under any applicable law, by- law, agreement, vote of
shareholders or disinterested directors or otherwise.
The Freeport-McMoRan bylaws further provide that
Freeport-McMoRan shall have the power to purchase and maintain
insurance on behalf of any director, advisory director, officer,
employee or agent against any liability asserted against him or
her and incurred by him or her in any such capacity, or arising
out of his or her status as such, whether or not
Freeport-McMoRan would have the power to indemnify him or her
against such liability under the Freeport-McMoRan certificate of
incorporation.
|
|
in settlement and expenses
(including attorneys fees) incurred in connection with
such action, or any appeal therein, provided that no
indemnification may be made to or on behalf of such person if
(i) his acts were committed in bad faith or were the
result of his active and deliberate dishonesty and were material
to such action or (ii) he personally gained a financial
profit or other advantage to which he was not legally
entitled.
Phelps Dodge shall be deemed to have requested
a person to serve an employee benefit plan where the performance
by such person of his duties to Phelps Dodge also imposes duties
on, or otherwise involves services by, such person to the plan
or participants or beneficiaries of the plan; excise taxes
assessed on a person with respect to an employee benefit plan
pursuant to applicable law shall be considered fines.
The termination of any civil or criminal action
or proceeding by judgment, settlement, conviction or upon a plea
of nolo contendere, or its equivalent, shall not in itself
create a presumption that any such director or officer has not
met the standard of conduct set forth in the Phelps Dodge
bylaws. However, no director or officer shall be entitled to
indemnification if a judgment or other final adjudication
adverse to the director or officer establishes that (i) his
acts were committed in bad faith or were the result of active
and deliberate dishonesty and were material to the cause of
action
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan Shareholder Rights
|
|
Phelps Dodge Shareholder Rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
so adjudicated, or (ii) he
personally gained a financial profit or other advantage to which
he was not legally entitled.
|
|
|
|
|
The Phelps Dodge bylaws further
provide that:
|
|
|
|
|
A person who has
been successful, on the merits or otherwise, in the defense of a
civil or criminal action or proceeding of the character
described above, shall be entitled to indemnification as
authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
Except as
described above, any indemnification, unless ordered by a court,
shall be made by Phelps Dodge only if authorized in the specific
case:
|
|
|
|
|
by the board of
directors acting by a quorum consisting of directors who are not
parties to the action or proceeding giving rise to the indemnity
claim upon a finding that the director or officer has met the
standard of conduct set forth in the Phelps Dodge bylaws; or
|
|
|
|
|
if a quorum is not
obtainable or, even if obtainable, a quorum of disinterested
directors so directs:
|
|
|
|
|
by the board of
directors upon the opinion in writing of independent legal
counsel (i.e., a reputable lawyer or law firm not under
regular retainer from Phelps Dodge or any subsidiary
corporation) that indemnification is proper in the circumstances
because the standard of conduct set forth in the bylaws has been
met by
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan Shareholder Rights
|
|
Phelps Dodge Shareholder Rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
such director or officer, or
|
|
|
|
|
by the holders of
Phelps Dodge common shares upon a finding that the director or
officer has met such standard of conduct.
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses incurred
by a director or officer in defending a civil or criminal action
or proceeding shall be paid by Phelps Dodge in advance of the
final disposition of such action or proceeding upon receipt of
an undertaking by or on behalf of such director or officer to
repay such amount in case he is ultimately found, in accordance
with the bylaws, not to be entitled to indemnification or, where
indemnity is granted, to the extent the expenses so paid exceed
the indemnification to which he is entitled.
|
|
|
|
|
Any
indemnification of a director or officer of Phelps Dodge or
advance of expenses under the bylaws shall be made promptly, and
in any event within 60 days, upon the written request of
the director or officer.
|
|
|
|
|
The Phelps Dodge bylaws further
provide that the right to indemnification or advances as granted
by the Phelps Dodge bylaws shall be enforceable by the director
or officer in any court of competent jurisdiction if Phelps
Dodge denies such request, in whole or in part, or if no
disposition thereof is made within 60 days. Such
persons expenses incurred in connection with successfully
establishing his right to indemnification, in whole or in part,
in any such action shall also be indemnified by Phelps Dodge. It
shall be a defense to any such action (other than an action
brought to enforce a claim for the advance of expenses) that
the
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan Shareholder Rights
|
|
Phelps Dodge Shareholder Rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
claimant has not met the standard
of conduct set forth in the bylaws, but the burden of proving
such defense shall be on Phelps Dodge. Neither the failure of
Phelps Dodge (including its board of directors, its independent
legal counsel, and the holders of its common shares) to have
made a determination that indemnification of the claimant is
proper in the circumstances nor the fact that there has been an
actual determination by Phelps Dodge (including its board of
directors, its independent legal counsel, and the holders of its
common shares) that indemnification of the claimant is not
proper in the circumstances, shall be a defense to the action or
shall create a presumption that the claimant is not entitled to
indemnification.
|
|
|
|
|
The Phelps Dodge bylaws further
provide that:
|
|
|
|
|
Its
indemnification provisions shall be deemed to be a contract
between Phelps Dodge and each director and officer who serves in
such capacity at any time while these provisions as well as the
relevant provisions of the New York Business Corporation Law are
in effect and any repeal or modification thereof shall not
affect any right or obligation then existing with respect to any
state of facts then or previously existing or any action or
proceeding previously or thereafter brought or threatened based
in whole or in part upon any such state of facts. Such a
contract right may not be modified retroactively without the
consent of such director or officer.
|
|
|
|
|
If any of the
provisions of the Phelps Dodge bylaws relating to
indemnification shall be invalidated on any ground by any court
of competent jurisdiction, then Phelps Dodge
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan Shareholder Rights
|
|
Phelps Dodge Shareholder Rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
shall indemnify each director or
officer of Phelps Dodge against judgments, fines, amounts paid
in settlement and expenses (including attorneys fees)
incurred in connection with any actual or threatened action or
proceeding, whether civil or criminal, including an actual or
threatened action by or in the right of Phelps Dodge, or any
appeal therein, to the full extent permitted by any applicable
portion of the Phelps Dodge bylaws that shall not have been
invalidated and to the full extent permitted by applicable law.
|
|
|
|
|
The
indemnification provided by the Phelps Dodge bylaws shall not be
deemed exclusive of any other rights to which those indemnified
may be entitled under any bylaw, agreement, vote of shareholders
or directors or otherwise, both as to action in his official
capacity and as to action in another capacity while holding such
office, and shall continue as to a person who has ceased to be a
director or officer and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs,
executors and administrators of such a person. Phelps Dodge is
hereby authorized to provide further indemnification if it deems
it advisable by resolution of shareholders or directors or by
agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
The Phelps Dodge bylaws further
provide that Phelps Dodge may, by resolution adopted by the
board of directors, indemnify any person not a Phelps Dodge
director or officer, who is made, or threatened to be made, a
party to an action or proceeding, whether civil or criminal, by
reason of the fact that he, his testator or intestate, is or was
an employee or other agent of Phelps Dodge, against judgments,
fines, amounts paid in settlement
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan Shareholder Rights
|
|
Phelps Dodge Shareholder Rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
and expenses (including
attorneys fees) incurred in connection with such action or
proceeding, or any appeal therein, provided that no
indemnification may be made to or on behalf of such person if
(i) his acts were committed in bad faith or were the result
of active and deliberate dishonesty and were material to such
action or proceeding or (ii) he personally gained in fact a
financial profit or other advantage to which he was not legally
entitled.
|
Appraisal
Rights:
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan shareholders are
not entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the
transaction.
|
|
Phelps Dodge shareholders are not
entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the transaction.
|
Rights
Plans:
|
|
Freeport-McMoRans
shareholder rights plan is discussed under Description of
Freeport-McMoRan Capital Stock.
|
|
Each Phelps Dodge common share
carries with it one preferred share purchase right. If these
rights become exercisable, each right entitles the registered
holder to purchase one four- hundredth of a Junior Participating
Cumulative Preferred Share (subject to a proportionate decrease
in the fractional number of Junior Participating Cumulative
Preferred Shares that may be purchased if a stock split, stock
dividend or similar transaction occurs with respect to the
common shares and a proportionate increase in the event of a
reverse stock split). Until a right is exercised, the holder of
the right has no right to vote or receive dividends or any other
rights as a shareholder as a result of holding the right. The
rights trade automatically with Phelps Dodge common shares and
are designed to protect Phelps Dodges interests and the
interests of Phelps Dodge shareholders against coercive takeover
tactics. The rights are also designed to encourage potential
acquirors to negotiate with the Phelps Dodge board of directors
before attempting a takeover and to increase the ability of the
board of directors to negotiate terms of any proposed takeover
that benefit Phelps Dodge shareholders.
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan Shareholder Rights
|
|
Phelps Dodge Shareholder Rights
|
|
Annual Meeting Proposals and
Notice:
|
|
The Freeport-McMoRan bylaws
provide that for business to be properly brought before an
annual meeting by a shareholder, the shareholder must have given
timely notice in writing to the secretary of the corporation. To
be timely, a shareholders notice must be delivered to the
secretary at Freeport-McMoRans principal executive offices
not later than the close of business on the 120th day nor
earlier than the close of business on the 210th day prior
to the first anniversary of the preceding years annual
meeting; provided, however, that in the event that
the date of the annual meeting is more than 30 days before
or more than 90 days after such anniversary date, notice by
the shareholder to be timely must be so delivered not earlier
than the close of business on the 120th day prior to such
annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the
later of the 90th day prior to such annual meeting or the
10th day following the day on which public announcement of
the date of such meeting is first made. In no event shall the
public announcement of an adjournment of an annual meeting
commence a new time period for the giving of a
shareholders notice as described above. A
shareholders notice to the secretary shall set forth as to
each matter the shareholder proposes to bring before the annual
meeting (i) a brief description of the business desired to
be brought before the annual meeting and the reasons for
conducting such business at the annual meeting, (ii) the
name and address, as they appear on Freeport-McMoRans
books, of the shareholder proposing such business,
(iii) the class and number of shares of Freeport-McMoRan
which are beneficially owned by Freeport-McMoRan and
(iv) any material interest of Freeport-McMoRan in such
business. The chairman of an
|
|
The Phelps Dodge bylaws provide
that for business to be properly brought before an annual
meeting by a shareholder, the shareholder must have given timely
notice thereof in writing to the secretary of Phelps Dodge. To
be timely, a shareholders notice must be delivered to or
mailed and received at the principal office of Phelps Dodge not
later than the close of business on the 90th day and not
earlier than the close of business of the 120th day prior
to the first anniversary of the preceding years annual
meeting; provided, however, that in the event that the date of
the annual meeting is more than 30 days before or more than
60 days after such anniversary date, notice by the
shareholder to be timely must be so received not earlier than
the close of business on the 120th day prior to the date of
such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on
the later of the 90th day prior to the date of such annual
meeting or the 10th day following the day on which public
announcement of the date of such annual meeting is first made.
In no event shall the public announcement of an adjournment of
an annual meeting commence a new time period for the giving of a
shareholders notice as described above. A
shareholders notice to the secretary shall set forth as to
each matter the shareholder proposes to bring before the annual
meeting (i) a brief description of the business desired to
be brought before the annual meeting and the reasons for
conducting such business at the annual meeting, (ii) the
name and address of the shareholder proposing such business, as
they appear on the Phelps Dodge books, and of the beneficial
owner, if any, on whose behalf such notice is being given, (iii)
the class and number of shares of Phelps Dodge which are owned
beneficially and of record
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan Shareholder Rights
|
|
Phelps Dodge Shareholder Rights
|
|
|
|
annual meeting shall, if the
facts warrant, determine and declare to the meeting that
business was not properly brought before the meeting and in
accordance with the provisions of the Freeport-McMoRan bylaws,
and if he should so determine, he shall so declare to the
meeting and any such business not properly brought before the
meeting shall not be transacted. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
a shareholder seeking to have a proposal included in Freeport-
McMoRans proxy statement shall comply with the
requirements of Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (including, but not limited to,
Rule 14a-8
or its successor provision).
|
|
by such shareholder and by such
beneficial owner and (iv) any material interest in such
business of such shareholder or of such beneficial owner. The
chairman of a meeting shall, if the facts warrant, determine and
declare to the meeting that business was not properly brought
before the meeting in accordance with the provisions of Phelps
Dodge bylaws, and if he should so determine, he shall declare to
the meeting that any such business not properly brought before
the meeting shall not be transacted. Nothing in the bylaws shall
be deemed to affect any rights of shareholders to request
inclusion of proposals in a Phelps Dodges proxy statement
pursuant to
Rule 14a-8
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and to
put before such meeting any proposals so included in Phelps
Dodges proxy statement at a shareholders request.
|
Special
Meetings:
|
|
The Freeport-McMoRan bylaws
provide that special meetings of the shareholders may be called
only by the chairman of the board of directors, the vice
chairman of the board of directors or the president of
Freeport-McMoRan, or at the request in writing or by a vote of a
majority of the board of directors, and not by any other
persons. Any request for a special meeting made by the board of
directors shall state the purpose or purposes of the proposed
meeting and that the business transacted at each special meeting
shall be confined to the purpose or purposes stated in the
notice of such meeting.
|
|
The Phelps Dodge bylaws provide
that special meetings of the shareholders may be called by a
majority of the board of directors or by the chairman of the
board. In addition, a special meeting shall be called and held
upon the written request of the record holders of common shares
representing in the aggregate 10% or more of the total number of
votes then eligible to be cast in an election of directors if
the board fails to call a special meeting for the election of
directors in accordance with New York law.
See above under Annual Meeting Proposals and
Notice regarding the notice requirements of a special
meeting.
|
Anti-Takeover
Statutes:
|
|
Sections relating to business
combinations in the Freeport-McMoRan certificate of
incorporation are discussed above under Vote
Required for Certain Corporate Actions. Under Delaware
law, a corporation is
|
|
New York law generally provides
that a New York corporation may not engage in a business
combination with an interested shareholder for a period of five
years following the interested shareholder becoming interested.
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan Shareholder Rights
|
|
Phelps Dodge Shareholder Rights
|
|
|
|
prohibited from engaging in any
business combination with an interested shareholder who,
together with its affiliates or associates, owns, or who is an
affiliate or associate of the corporation and within a
three-year period since becoming an owner of, 15% or more of the
corporations voting stock for a three year period
following the time the shareholder became an interested
shareholder, unless:
prior to the shareholder becoming an interested
shareholder, the board of directors of the corporation approved
either the business combination or the transaction which
resulted in the shareholder becoming an interested shareholder;
the interested shareholder owned at least 85% of
the voting stock (not to include shares owned by directors who
are also officers and shares held by certain employee stock
plans) of the corporation, upon consummation of the transaction
which resulted in the shareholder becoming an interested
shareholder; or
at or subsequent to the time the shareholder
became an interested shareholder, the business combination is
approved by the board of directors of the corporation and
authorized by the affirmative vote, at an annual or special
meeting and not by written consent, of at least
662/3%
of the outstanding voting stock of the corporation, excluding
shares held by that interested shareholder.
A business combination generally includes:
|
|
Such a business combination would
be permitted where it is approved by the board of directors
before the interested shareholder becomes interested, or within
thirty days thereafter, if a good faith proposal regarding a
business combination is made in writing.
Covered business combinations include certain mergers and
consolidations, dispositions of assets or stock, plans for
liquidation or dissolution, reclassifications of securities,
recapitalizations and similar transactions. An interested
shareholder is generally a shareholder owning at least 20% of a
corporations outstanding voting stock.
In addition, New York corporations may not engage at any time
with any interested shareholder in a business combination other
than:
a business combination approved by the board of
directors before the stock acquisition, or where the acquisition
of the stock had been approved by the board directors before the
stock acquisition;
a business combination approved by the affirmative
vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding voting
stock not beneficially owned by interested shareholder at a
meeting for that purpose no earlier than five years after the
stock acquisitions; or
a business combination in which the interested
shareholder pays a formula price designed to ensure that all
other shareholders receive at least the highest price per share
that is paid by the interested shareholder and that meets
certain other
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan Shareholder Rights
|
|
Phelps Dodge Shareholder Rights
|
|
|
|
mergers, consolidations and sales or other
dispositions of 10% or more of the assets of a corporation to or
with an interested shareholder;
specified transactions resulting in the issuance
or transfer to an interested shareholder of any capital stock of
the corporation or its subsidiaries; and
other transactions resulting in a disproportionate
financial benefit to an interested shareholder.
The provisions of Delaware law relating to business
combinations do not apply to a corporation if, subject to
certain requirements, the certificate of incorporation or bylaws
of the corporation contain a provision expressly electing not to
be governed by the provisions of the statute or the corporation
does not have voting stock listed on a national securities
exchange, authorized for quotation on an inter- dealer quotation
system of a registered national securities association or held
of record by more than 2,000 shareholders.
Freeport-McMoRan has not adopted any provision in its
certificate of incorporation or bylaws to opt out of
the Delaware laws relating to business combinations.
|
|
requirements.
Although New York law permits a corporation to opt
out of the rules described above by an amendment to its
bylaws approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of votes
of the outstanding voting stock of such corporation, excluding
the voting stock of interested shareholders and their affiliates
and associates, Phelps Dodge has not done so.
|
106
COMPARATIVE
MARKET PRICES AND DIVIDENDS
Freeport-McMoRan common stock is currently listed on the New
York Stock Exchange under the symbol FCX. Phelps
Dodge common shares are also currently listed on the New York
Stock Exchange under the symbol PD. The following
table sets forth the high and low daily prices of shares of
Freeport-McMoRan
common stock and Phelps Dodge common shares as reported on the
New York Stock Exchange, and for each calendar quarter
indicated, the dividends declared for Freeport-McMoRan common
stock and Phelps Dodge common shares. The prices listed for
Phelps Dodge are adjusted to account for Phelps Dodges
March 10, 2006 stock split. Following the completion of the
transaction, Freeport-McMoRan expects to continue its regular
annual common dividend of $1.25 per share and to
discontinue its practice of paying special dividends for the
foreseeable future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan Common Stock
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge Common Shares
|
|
|
|
Market Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
44.90
|
|
|
$
|
35.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.200
|
|
|
$
|
45.26
|
|
|
$
|
35.43
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
39.85
|
|
|
|
27.76
|
|
|
|
0.200
|
|
|
|
42.40
|
|
|
|
29.90
|
|
|
|
0.125
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
42.13
|
|
|
|
31.54
|
|
|
|
0.200
|
|
|
|
46.87
|
|
|
|
34.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
42.55
|
|
|
|
33.98
|
|
|
|
0.500
|
|
|
|
50.78
|
|
|
|
40.26
|
|
|
|
0.125
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
43.90
|
|
|
$
|
35.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.750
|
|
|
$
|
54.56
|
|
|
$
|
45.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.125
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
40.31
|
|
|
|
31.52
|
|
|
|
0.250
|
|
|
|
51.72
|
|
|
|
39.10
|
|
|
|
0.313
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
49.48
|
|
|
|
37.12
|
|
|
|
0.750
|
|
|
|
66.23
|
|
|
|
45.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
56.35
|
|
|
|
43.80
|
|
|
|
0.750
|
|
|
|
74.63
|
|
|
|
57.10
|
|
|
|
2.688
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
65.00
|
|
|
$
|
47.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.8125
|
|
|
$
|
83.56
|
|
|
$
|
65.14
|
|
|
$
|
2.188
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
72.20
|
|
|
|
43.10
|
|
|
|
1.0625
|
|
|
|
102.80
|
|
|
|
72.32
|
|
|
|
2.400
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
62.29
|
|
|
|
47.58
|
|
|
|
1.0625
|
|
|
|
94.78
|
|
|
|
75.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
63.70
|
|
|
|
47.60
|
|
|
|
1.8125
|
|
|
|
124.75
|
|
|
|
76.31
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter (through
February 9, 2007)
|
|
$
|
58.56
|
|
|
$
|
48.85
|
|
|
$
|
0.3125
|
|
|
$
|
124.77
|
|
|
$
|
114.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
As reported on the New York Stock Exchange, the closing sale
price per share of Freeport-McMoRan common stock on
November 17, 2006, the last business day prior to the
transaction, was $57.40. As reported on the New York Stock
Exchange, the closing sale price per Phelps Dodge common share
on that date was $95.02.
The market prices of Freeport-McMoRan common stock and Phelps
Dodge common shares will fluctuate between the date of this
document and the time of the special meetings or the completion
of the transaction. No assurance can be given concerning the
market prices of Freeport-McMoRan common stock or Phelps Dodge
common shares before the completion of the transaction or the
market price of Freeport-McMoRan common stock after the
completion of the transaction. The exchange ratio and cash
consideration are fixed in the merger agreement. One result of
this is that the market value of the Freeport-McMoRan common
stock that Phelps Dodge shareholders will receive in the
transaction may vary significantly from the prices shown in the
table above. Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge shareholders are
advised to obtain current market prices for Freeport-McMoRan
common stock and Phelps Dodge common shares.
107
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements
presented herein, which have been prepared by the management of
Freeport-McMoRan, are derived from the historical consolidated
financial statements of Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge. The
unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements are
prepared using the purchase method of accounting, with the
acquisition of Phelps Dodge by Freeport-McMoRan assumed to have
occurred on January 1, 2005, for statement of income
purposes and on September 30, 2006, for balance sheet
purposes using accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States, referred to as U.S. GAAP. Upon completion of
the combination with Phelps Dodge, the pre-combination
shareholders of Freeport-McMoRan will own approximately 59% (62%
on a fully diluted basis) of the combined company and the
pre-combination shareholders of Phelps Dodge will own
approximately 41% (38% on a fully diluted basis). In addition to
considering these relative shareholdings, the company also
considered the proposed composition and terms of the board of
directors, the proposed structure and members of the executive
management team of Freeport-McMoRan and the premium paid by
Freeport-McMoRan to acquire Phelps Dodge, in determining the
accounting acquirer. Based on the weight of these factors,
Freeport-McMoRan
management concluded that Freeport-McMoRan was the accounting
acquirer.
The pro forma amounts have been developed from (i) the
audited consolidated financial statements of Freeport-McMoRan
contained in its annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005, (ii) the audited
consolidated financial statements of Phelps Dodge contained in
its annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005, (iii) the
unaudited consolidated financial statements of
Freeport-McMoRan
contained in its Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2006 and (iv) the
unaudited consolidated financial statements of Phelps Dodge
contained in its Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2006, each of which were
prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements
are provided for illustrative purposes only and do not purport
to represent what the actual consolidated results of operations
or the consolidated financial position of Freeport-McMoRan would
have been had the combination occurred on the dates assumed, nor
are they necessarily indicative of future consolidated results
of operations or consolidated financial position. In this
regard, the reader should note that the unaudited pro forma
condensed combined financial statements do not give effect to
(i) any integration costs that may be incurred as a result
of the acquisition, (ii) synergies, operating efficiencies
and cost savings that are expected to result from the
acquisition, (iii) benefits expected to be derived from the
combined companys growth projects or brownfield expansions
or (iv) changes in commodities prices subsequent to the
dates of such unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
statements.
Freeport-McMoRan has not yet developed formal plans for
combining the two companies operations. Accordingly,
additional liabilities may be incurred in connection with the
business combination and any ultimate restructuring. These
additional liabilities and costs have not been contemplated in
the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements
because information necessary to reasonably estimate such costs
and to formulate detailed restructuring plans is not available
to Freeport-McMoRan. The allocation of the purchase price to
acquired assets and liabilities in the unaudited pro forma
condensed combined financial statements are based on
managements preliminary internal valuation estimates. Such
allocations will be finalized based on valuation and other
studies to be performed by management with the services of
outside valuation specialists after the closing of the business
combination. Accordingly, the purchase price allocation
adjustments and related impacts on the unaudited pro forma
condensed combined financial statements are preliminary and are
subject to revision, which may be material, after the closing of
the business combination.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the separate historical
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes of
Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge incorporated by reference into
this proxy statement. See Where You Can Find More
Information on page 120.
108
FREEPORT-MCMORAN
AND PHELPS DODGE
PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006
(AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE INFORMATION)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper & Gold
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge
|
|
|
Adjustments (Note 3)
|
|
|
Pro Forma Combined
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
4,148
|
|
|
$
|
8,675 (Note 4
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,823 (Note 4
|
)
|
Cost of sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production and delivery
|
|
|
1,875
|
|
|
|
5,171
|
|
|
|
60
|
(A)
|
|
|
7,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
) (M)
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
446
|
(J)
|
|
|
928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of sales
|
|
|
2,022
|
|
|
|
5,496
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
8,021
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
(7
|
) (A)
|
|
|
245
|
|
Exploration and research expenses
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
Special items and provisions, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
(63
|
) (A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
2,142
|
|
|
|
5,804
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
8,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
2,006
|
|
|
|
2,871
|
|
|
|
(433
|
)
|
|
|
4,444
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
41
|
(A)
|
|
|
(1,049
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(976
|
) (N)
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(41
|
) (A)
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in PT Smelting and
affiliated companies earnings
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
(A)
|
|
|
10
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before taxes and minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
1,966
|
|
|
|
3,057
|
|
|
|
(1,406
|
)
|
|
|
3,617
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(836
|
)
|
|
|
(824
|
)
|
|
|
228
|
(F)
|
|
|
(1,432
|
)
|
Minority interests in net income of
consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
(525
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(640
|
)
|
Equity in net earnings of
affiliated companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(3
|
) (A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
1,015
|
|
|
|
1,711
|
|
|
|
(1,181
|
)
|
|
|
1,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred dividends
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
Income from continuing operations
applicable to common stock
|
|
$
|
970
|
|
|
$
|
1,711 (Note 4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,181
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,500 (Note 4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per share from continuing
operations applicable to common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
5.14
|
|
|
$
|
8.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.61
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
4.64
|
|
|
$
|
8.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.35
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
188.7
|
|
|
|
202.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325.7
|
(L)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
221.4
|
|
|
|
203.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358.5
|
(L)
|
See accompanying notes to these pro forma condensed combined
financial statements.
109
FREEPORT-MCMORAN
AND PHELPS DODGE
PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005
(AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE INFORMATION)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper & Gold
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge
|
|
|
Adjustments (Note 3)
|
|
|
Pro Forma Combined
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
4,179
|
|
|
$
|
8,287 (Note 4
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,466 (Note 4
|
)
|
Cost of sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production and delivery
|
|
|
1,638
|
|
|
|
5,282
|
|
|
|
109
|
(A)
|
|
|
7,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
) (M)
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
594
|
(J)
|
|
|
1,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
433
|
(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of sales
|
|
|
1,889
|
|
|
|
5,724
|
|
|
|
1,117
|
|
|
|
8,730
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
(19
|
) (A)
|
|
|
243
|
|
Exploration and research expenses
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
Special items and provisions, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
(523
|
) (A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
2,002
|
|
|
|
6,522
|
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
9,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
2,177
|
|
|
|
1,765
|
|
|
|
(575
|
)
|
|
|
3,367
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
(A)
|
|
|
(1,493
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,299
|
) (N)
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(16
|
) (A)
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in PT Smelting and
affiliated companies earnings
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
(A)
|
|
|
12
|
|
Losses on early extinguishment and
conversion of debt
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
Gain on sale of cost-basis
investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
Change in interest gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before taxes and minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
2,037
|
|
|
|
2,349
|
|
|
|
(1,871
|
)
|
|
|
2,515
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(915
|
)
|
|
|
(577
|
)
|
|
|
302
|
(F)
|
|
|
(1,190
|
)
|
Minority interests in net income of
consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(318
|
)
|
Equity in net earnings of
affiliated companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(3
|
) (A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
995
|
|
|
|
1,584
|
|
|
|
(1,572
|
)
|
|
|
1,007
|
|
Preferred dividends
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
applicable to common stock
|
|
$
|
935
|
|
|
$
|
1,577 (Note 4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,572
|
)
|
|
$
|
940 (Note 4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per share from continuing
operations applicable to common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
5.18
|
|
|
$
|
8.06
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.96
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
4.67
|
|
|
$
|
7.82
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.92
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
180.3
|
|
|
|
195.7
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
317.3
|
(L)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
220.5
|
|
|
|
202.5
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
357.5
|
(L)
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Shares and per share amounts have been adjusted to reflect the
March 10, 2006 stock split. |
See accompanying notes to these pro forma condensed combined
financial statements.
110
FREEPORT-MCMORAN
AND PHELPS DODGE
PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2006
(AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper & Gold
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge
|
|
|
Adjustments (Note 3)
|
|
|
Pro Forma Combined
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
699
|
|
|
$
|
4,086
|
|
|
$
|
16,000
|
(K)
|
|
$
|
2,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(330
|
) (C)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100
|
) (C)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
(H)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67
|
) (E)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,000
|
) (B)
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
1,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,081
|
|
Mill and leach stockpiles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
1,590
|
(D)
|
|
|
1,690
|
|
Product inventories
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
1,417
|
(D)
|
|
|
2,209
|
|
Materials and supplies
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
2,033
|
|
|
|
6,678
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
9,246
|
|
Investments and long-term
receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
Property, plant, equipment and
development costs, net
|
|
|
3,113
|
|
|
|
5,370
|
|
|
|
11,883
|
(D)
|
|
|
20,366
|
|
Long-term mill and leach stockpiles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
986
|
(D)
|
|
|
1,163
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
8,531
|
(D)
|
|
|
8,544
|
|
Trust assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
579
|
|
Other assets and deferred charges
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
(292
|
) (D)
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330
|
(C)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28
|
) (D)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
5,280
|
|
|
$
|
13,449
|
|
|
$
|
21,945
|
|
|
$
|
40,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued
liabilities
|
|
$
|
684
|
|
|
$
|
2,103
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,787
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
and short-term borrowings
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
1
|
(D)
|
|
|
199
|
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
927
|
|
|
|
2,476
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3,404
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
797
|
|
|
|
61
|
(D)
|
|
|
17,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
(K)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
804
|
|
|
|
835
|
|
|
|
4,684
|
(F)
|
|
|
6,323
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits and
other liabilities
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
1,430
|
|
|
|
(108
|
) (D)
|
|
|
1,569
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
1,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,635
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible perpetual preferred
stock
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
14
|
(G)
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,275
|
) (I)
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in excess of par value of
common stock
|
|
|
2,661
|
|
|
|
1,366
|
|
|
|
7,777
|
(G)
|
|
|
10,438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,366
|
) (I)
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
1,346
|
|
|
|
3,937
|
|
|
|
(3,937
|
) (I)
|
|
|
1,346
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
94
|
(I)
|
|
|
3
|
|
Common stock held in treasury
|
|
|
(2,749
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,749
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,392
|
|
|
|
6,484
|
|
|
|
1,307
|
|
|
|
10,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
5,280
|
|
|
$
|
13,449
|
|
|
$
|
21,945
|
|
|
$
|
40,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to these pro forma condensed combined
financial statements.
111
COMBINATION
OF FREEPORT-MCMORAN AND PHELPS DODGE
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONDENSED
COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements,
which have been prepared by Freeport-McMoRan management, have
been derived from historical consolidated financial statements
of Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge incorporated by reference
into this proxy statement.
Upon completion of the combination with Phelps Dodge the
pre-combination shareholders of Freeport-McMoRan will own
approximately 59% of the combined company (62% on a fully
diluted basis) and the pre-combination shareholders of Phelps
Dodge, will own approximately 41% of the combined company (38%
on a fully diluted basis). In addition to considering these
relative shareholdings, Freeport-McMoRan management also
considered the proposed composition and terms of the board of
directors, the proposed structure and members of the executive
management team of Freeport-McMoRan, and the premium paid by
Freeport-McMoRan to acquire Phelps Dodge in determining the
accounting acquirer. Based on the weight of these factors,
Freeport-McMoRan management concluded that Freeport-McMoRan was
the accounting acquirer.
Freeport-McMoRan proposes to acquire all the issued and
outstanding common shares of Phelps Dodge for $88.00 in cash and
0.67 of a share of Freeport-McMoRan common stock for each Phelps
Dodge common share. Based on Freeport-McMoRans closing
stock price of $57.40 per share on November 17, 2006,
the implied value of the merger consideration is $126.46,
composed of $88.00 in cash and stock worth $38.46 per share.
The transaction will be accounted for under the purchase method
of accounting. The pro forma adjustments reflect
Freeport-McMoRans acquisition of 100% of Phelps
Dodges net reported assets at their fair values at
September 30, 2006 for the pro forma balance sheet and at
January 1, 2005 for the pro forma income statements, and
the subsequent accounting for Phelps Dodge as a wholly owned
subsidiary.
The purchase price consideration for the business combination is
estimated to include $18.0 billion in cash,
$7.8 billion in Freeport-McMoRan common stock and
$167 million for costs and fees of the acquisition as shown
below (dollars and shares in millions, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRans
acquisition of Phelps Dodge:
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding and
issuable
|
|
|
204.546
|
|
Exchange offer ratio of
Freeport-McMoRan common stock for each Phelps Dodge common share
|
|
|
0.67
|
|
Shares of Freeport-McMoRan common
stock to be issued
|
|
|
137.046
|
|
Weighted average market price of
each share of Freeport-McMoRan common stock from November
16-21, 2006
|
|
$
|
56.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration for each Phelps
Dodge common share
|
|
$
|
88.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of Freeport-McMoRan
common stock issued, comprising par value of $13.7
($0.10 per share) and capital in excess of par of $7,777.3
|
|
$
|
7,791
|
|
Cash consideration of $88.00 for
each Phelps Dodge common share
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
Estimated change of control costs
and related employee benefits
|
|
|
67
|
|
Estimated transaction costs
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price
|
|
$
|
25,958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112
COMBINATION
OF FREEPORT-MCMORAN AND PHELPS DODGE
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONDENSED
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
3.
|
Pro Forma
Assumptions and Adjustments
|
The following assumptions and related pro forma adjustments give
effect to the proposed business combination of Freeport-McMoRan
and Phelps Dodge as if such combination occurred on
January 1, 2005, in the unaudited pro forma condensed
combined statement of income for the nine-month interim period
ended September 30, 2006, and for the year ended
December 31, 2005, and on September 30, 2006, for the
unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements
are provided for illustrative purposes only and do not purport
to represent what the actual consolidated results of operations
or the consolidated financial position of Freeport-McMoRan would
have been had the business combination with Phelps Dodge
occurred on the respective dates assumed, nor are they
necessarily indicative of future consolidated operating results
or financial position.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements
do not reflect and do not give effect to (i) any
integration costs that may be incurred as a result of the
acquisition, (ii) synergies, operating efficiencies and
cost savings that are expected to result from acquisition,
(iii) benefits expected to be derived from the combined
companys growth projects or brownfield expansions or
(iv) changes in commodities prices subsequent to the dates
of such unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
statements.
Additionally, Freeport-McMoRan believes that cost savings will
be realized upon the consolidation and integration of the
companies. Freeport-McMoRan has not developed formal plans for
combining the operations. Accordingly, additional liabilities
may be incurred in connection with the business combination and
ultimate restructuring. These additional liabilities and costs
have not been contemplated in the unaudited pro forma condensed
combined financial statements because information necessary to
reasonably estimate such costs and to formulate detailed
restructuring plans is not yet available to Freeport-McMoRan.
Accordingly, the allocation of the purchase price cannot be
estimated with a reasonable degree of accuracy and may differ
materially from the amounts assumed in the unaudited pro forma
condensed combined financial statements.
As shown in adjustment D below, Freeport-McMoRan expects the
accounting for the acquisition of Phelps Dodge to result in a
significant amount of goodwill. Goodwill is the excess cost of
the acquired company over the sum of the amounts assigned to
assets acquired less liabilities assumed. Generally accepted
accounting principles in the U.S. require that goodwill not
be amortized, but instead allocated to a level within the
reporting entity referred to as the reporting unit and tested
for impairment, at least annually. There is currently diversity
in the mining industry associated with certain aspects of the
accounting for business combinations and related goodwill. This
diversity includes how companies define Value Beyond Proven and
Probable reserves (referred to in this document as VBPP) (see
further discussion in adjustment J below), what an appropriate
reporting unit is and how goodwill is allocated among reporting
units. The methods of allocating goodwill have included
allocations primarily to a single exploration reporting unit and
allocations among individual mine reporting units depending on
the relevant circumstances. We understand the industry is also
evaluating other methodologies for allocating goodwill. The
method of allocating goodwill will likely have an impact on the
amount and timing of any future goodwill impairment, if any.
Freeport-McMoRan has not completed its determination of the
combined companys reporting units nor its method of
allocating goodwill to those reporting units. Our ultimate
accounting for VBPP and goodwill may not be comparable to other
companies within the mining industry.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements
include the following pro forma assumptions and adjustments:
(A) Reclassifications have been made to the Phelps Dodge
historical consolidated financial information to conform to
Freeport-McMoRans presentation. This included
reclassifying amounts described by Phelps Dodge on a single line
item as Special items and provisions, net into
production and delivery
113
COMBINATION
OF FREEPORT-MCMORAN AND PHELPS DODGE
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONDENSED
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
costs, into depreciation, depletion and amortization and into
selling, general and administrative expenses based on
Freeport-McMoRans reporting for these items. The
reclassifications also reflect the reporting of Phelps
Dodges Capitalized interest as a component of
Interest expense, net to conform to
Freeport-McMoRans reporting.
(B) This pro forma adjustment represents payment of the
cash component of the purchase price for Phelps Dodge common
shares.
(C) Freeport-McMoRan estimates it will incur approximately
$430 million of transaction costs, consisting primarily of
financing costs, financial advisory fees, legal and accounting
fees, financial printing and other charges related to the
purchase of Phelps Dodge. Approximately $330 million of
these transaction costs will be recorded as deferred charges on
the combined companys balance sheet and the remaining
approximately $100 million will be recorded as part of the
cost to purchase Phelps Dodge. These estimates are preliminary
and, therefore, are subject to change.
(D) The net assets to be acquired from Phelps Dodge, the
pro forma adjustments to reflect the fair value of Phelps
Dodges net reported assets and other purchase accounting
adjustments are estimated as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge net assets on
September 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
6,484
|
|
Adjustment to fair value mill and
leach stockpiles inventory current
|
|
$
|
1,590
|
|
Adjustment to fair value mill and
leach stockpiles inventory long-term
|
|
$
|
986
|
|
Adjustment to fair value product
inventory
|
|
$
|
1,417
|
|
Adjustment to fair value property,
plant, equipment and development costs
|
|
$
|
11,883
|
|
Adjustment to fair value pension
assets
|
|
$
|
(292
|
)
|
Adjustment to fair value debt
issuance costs
|
|
$
|
(28
|
)
|
Adjustment to fair value debt
|
|
$
|
(62
|
)
|
Adjustment to fair value pension
and post-retirement obligations
|
|
$
|
108
|
|
Adjustment to deferred taxes to
reflect fair value adjustments (see F)
|
|
$
|
(4,684
|
)
|
Cash proceeds from assumed
exercise of stock options (see H)
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net tangible assets and
liabilities acquired
|
|
$
|
17,427
|
|
Allocation to Goodwill
|
|
$
|
8,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$
|
25,958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The allocation of the purchase price is based upon
managements preliminary estimates and certain assumptions
with respect to the fair value increment associated with the
assets to be acquired and the liabilities to be assumed. The
actual fair values of the assets and liabilities will be
determined as of the date of acquisition and may differ
materially from the amounts disclosed above in the assumed pro
forma purchase price allocation because of changes in fair
values of the assets and liabilities between September 30,
2006 and the date of the transaction, and as further analysis
(including of identifiable intangible assets, for which no
amounts have been estimated and included in the preliminary
amounts shown above) is completed. Consequently, the actual
allocation of the purchase price may result in different
adjustments in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined
statements of income. Following completion of the transaction,
the earnings of the combined company will reflect the impact of
purchase accounting adjustments, including the effect of changes
in the cost bases of both tangible and identifiable intangible
assets and liabilities on production costs and depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense. The unaudited pro forma
condensed combined statements of income reflect Phelps
Dodges metal inventories on its historical accounting
method of
last-in,
first-out. Inventories are subject to a lower of
114
COMBINATION
OF FREEPORT-MCMORAN AND PHELPS DODGE
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONDENSED
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
cost or market assessment and a decline in metal prices could
result in a write down of metal inventory values and a
corresponding charge to future earnings of the combined company.
(E) This pro forma adjustment recognizes certain estimated
change of control obligations arising from the combination of
Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan.
(F) The estimated income tax effect of the pro forma
adjustments has been recorded based upon statutory tax rates in
effect in the various tax jurisdictions in which Phelps Dodge
operates, resulting in an estimated tax rate of approximately
10% for interest costs and 30% for all other items. The
statutory tax rates range from 20% to 35%. The estimated tax
rates are a weighted calculation of the various statutory tax
rates and consider tax credits, exempt income and non-deductible
expenses. The estimated tax rate for interest costs of 10% has
been derived from a preliminary analysis of the applicable rules
for interest cost allocation required by U.S. tax
regulations and considers their associated limitation on the
utilization of foreign tax credits. These rates will vary
depending on the mix of income derived in the respective
countries of operation and the allocation of interest and other
expenses. The actual tax rates will also be affected by any tax
planning opportunities that may result from the combination of
the companies after the transaction. The business combination is
expected to be non-taxable to the respective companies, with
Phelps Dodges historical tax bases surviving for income
tax reporting purposes. Additional deferred income taxes have
been recognized based on the pro forma fair value adjustments to
assets and liabilities.
Provisions for pro forma income tax expense have been recorded
as pro forma adjustments to the unaudited pro forma condensed
combined statements of income.
(G) These pro forma adjustments reflect the issuance of
137.0 million shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock in
connection with the offer for all the outstanding common shares
of Phelps Dodge. The common stock of Freeport-McMoRan totals
$13.7 million at $0.10 per share par value and capital
in excess of par of $7,777.3 million. These shares include
the shares issuable in connection with the stock options and
restricted stock of Phelps Dodge outstanding at
September 30, 2006.
(H) This pro forma adjustment gives effect to
$25 million of proceeds to be received from the assumed
exercise of Phelps Dodges
in-the-money
stock options. Freeport-McMoRan has assumed that all of the
Phelps Dodge stock options are exercised and all restricted
stock is vested prior to the purchase transaction.
(I) These pro forma adjustments eliminate the historical
shareholders equity accounts of Phelps Dodge.
(J) This pro forma adjustment represents the estimated
increase to depreciation, depletion and amortization expense
associated with the preliminary fair value adjustment of
approximately $11,883 million allocated to plant, property,
equipment and development costs as further discussed in
adjustment D. Freeport-McMoRan has not completed an assessment
of the fair values of assets and liabilities of Phelps Dodge and
the related business integration plans and synergies. The
ultimate purchase price allocation will include possible
adjustments to the fair values of depreciable tangible assets,
proven and probable reserves, reserves related to current
development projects, value beyond proven and probable reserves
(referred to in this document as VBPP) and intangible assets
after a full review has been completed. The concept of VBPP is
described in Financial Accounting Standards Board Emerging Issue
Task Force Issue
No. 04-3
(EITF 04-3)
and has been interpreted differently by mining companies. Our
preliminary adjustment to plant, equipment and development
costs, as discussed below, includes VBPP attributable to
mineralized material that Freeport-McMoRan believes could be
brought into production should market conditions warrant.
Mineralized material is a mineralized body that has been
delineated by appropriately spaced drilling
and/or
underground sampling to support reported tonnage and average
grade
115
COMBINATION
OF FREEPORT-MCMORAN AND PHELPS DODGE
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONDENSED
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
of metal(s). Such a deposit may not qualify as proven and
probable reserves until legal and economic feasibility are
concluded based upon a comprehensive evaluation of unit costs,
grade, recoveries and other material factors. Our preliminary
adjustments to property, plant, equipment and development costs
do not include adjustments attributable to inferred mineral
resources or exploration potential referred to in the EITF
04-3 Working
Group Report No. 1. We intend to allocate a portion of the
purchase price to all VBPP, including inferred mineral resources
and exploration potential, in accordance with EITF
04-3 after
performing a more thorough analysis to determine the fair value
of these assets.
The preliminary allocation of $11,883 million to property,
plant, equipment and development costs is primarily based on a
fair value assessment of estimated cash flows from Phelps
Dodges pro rata share of estimated proven and probable
reserves, an estimated market value of Phelps Dodges
estimated VBPP attributable to mineralized material and
valuation multiples applied to certain tangible assets.
Freeport-McMoRan has not completed an assessment of the fair
values of assets and liabilities of Phelps Dodge and the related
business integration plans and synergies. The ultimate purchase
price allocation will include possible adjustments to fair
values of depreciable tangible assets, proven and probable
reserves, reserves related to current development projects, mill
and leach stockpiles, product inventories, VBPP and intangible
assets after a full review has been completed.
For the purpose of preparing the unaudited pro forma condensed
combined statements of income, Freeport-McMoRan assumed an
average estimated remaining useful life of 20 years, which
was based on an analysis of Phelps Dodges estimated mine
lives and on the estimated useful lives of other property, plant
and equipment disclosed in Phelps Dodges public filings
and
life-of-mine
plans provided to Freeport-McMoRan. A one-year change in the
estimated useful life would have a 5% impact on the pro forma
depreciation, depletion and amortization expense. Additionally,
for each $1 billion that the final fair value of property,
plant, equipment and development costs differs from the pro
forma fair value, related depreciation, depletion and
amortization expense would increase or decrease approximately
$50 million annually, or $12.5 million quarterly,
assuming a weighted
average 20-year
life.
(K) This pro forma adjustment relates to borrowings under a
new $10.0 billion term loan facility and $6.0 billion
of new senior notes. The proceeds from borrowings under these
facilities, in conjunction with available cash, would be used
for: (i) the $88.00 per share cash payment to Phelps
Dodge shareholders and (ii) payments for other transaction
fees and expenses.
(L) Pro forma weighted average common stock and common
stock equivalents outstanding are estimated as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
Average number of shares of
historical Freeport-McMoRan common stock outstanding
|
|
|
188.7
|
|
|
|
221.4
|
|
|
|
180.3
|
|
|
|
220.5
|
|
Shares of Freeport-McMoRan common
stock to be issued in connection with the business combination
(Note 2)
|
|
|
137.0
|
|
|
|
137.0
|
|
|
|
137.0
|
|
|
|
137.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
325.7
|
|
|
|
358.5
|
*
|
|
|
317.3
|
|
|
|
357.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Represents the sum of the numbers before rounding. |
The average number of common shares outstanding gives effect to
outstanding Phelps Dodge stock options and restricted stock, all
of which are assumed to be exercised or vested. Based upon
public information reported and the current exchange offer
ratio, Freeport-McMoRan estimates that the
116
COMBINATION
OF FREEPORT-MCMORAN AND PHELPS DODGE
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONDENSED
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
incremental number of shares of Freeport-McMoRan stock issuable
upon the exercise and vesting of Phelps Dodge stock options and
restricted stock would be 1,412,545.
(M) This pro forma adjustment eliminates amortization
expense for past service costs and net actuarial losses relating
to postretirement benefits recorded by Phelps Dodge.
(N) This pro forma adjustment recognizes imputed interest
expense for the year ended December 31, 2005, and the nine
months ended September 30, 2006, resulting from the fair
value adjustment of Phelps Dodges long-term debt and
acquisition-related debt discussed in Note (K) above at an
assumed weighted average interest rate of approximately 7.8%. A
12.5 basis-point change in interest rates on the
acquisition-related debt would increase (decrease) interest
expense by approximately $20 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005, and by approximately $15 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
Amounts include charges for
mark-to-market
losses on Phelps Dodges copper price protection program
totaling $1,215.1 million in revenues and
$923.5 million ($4.54 per diluted share on a Phelps
Dodge historical basis and $2.58 per diluted share on a pro
forma combined basis) in income from continuing operations for
the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006, and
$411.0 million in revenues and $255.4 million
($1.26 per diluted share on a Phelps Dodge historical basis
and $0.71 per diluted share on a pro forma combined basis)
in income from continuing operations for the year ended
December 31, 2005.
117
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of Freeport-McMoRan
incorporated by reference in Freeport-McMoRans annual
report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 (including schedules
appearing therein), and Freeport-McMoRan managements
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, incorporated
by reference have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP,
independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in
their reports thereon, incorporated by reference therein, and
incorporated herein by reference. Such consolidated financial
statements and managements assessment are incorporated
herein by reference in reliance upon such reports given on the
authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
With respect to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim
financial information of Freeport-McMoRan for the three-month
periods ended March 31, 2006 and March 31, 2005, and
the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and
June 30, 2005, and the three and nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005,
incorporated by reference in this document, Ernst &
Young LLP reported that they have applied limited procedures in
accordance with professional standards for a review of such
information. However, their separate reports dated
April 24, 2006 and August 1, 2006 and October 31,
2006 included in Freeport-McMoRans Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended March 31, 2006, June 30, 2006
and September 30, 2006, and incorporated by reference
herein, state that they did not audit and they do not express an
opinion on that interim financial information. Accordingly, the
degree of reliance on their report on such information should be
restricted in light of the limited nature of the review
procedures applied. Ernst & Young LLP is not subject to
the liability provisions of Section 11 of the Securities
Act for their reports on the unaudited interim financial
information because those reports are not a report
or a part of the Registration Statement prepared or
certified by Ernst & Young LLP within the meaning of
Sections 7 and 11 of the Securities Act.
The audited financial statements of Phelps Dodge and
managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting (which is included in
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting) incorporated in this document by reference to Phelps
Dodges annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 have been so
incorporated in reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, given on the
authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
With respect to the unaudited interim financial information of
Phelps Dodge for the three-month periods ended March 31,
2006 and March 31, 2005, the three- and six-month periods
ended June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005 and the three-
and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and
September 30, 2005, incorporated by reference in this
document, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP reported that they have
applied limited procedures in accordance with professional
standards for a review of such information. However, their
separate reports dated April 26, 2006 and July 25,
2006 and October 23, 2006, included in the Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended March 31, 2006, June 30, 2006
and September 30, 2006, and incorporated by reference
herein, state that they did not audit and they do not express an
opinion on that unaudited interim financial information.
Accordingly, the degree of reliance on their report on such
information should be restricted in light of the limited nature
of the review procedures applied. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is
not subject to the liability provisions of Section 11 of
the Securities Act for their reports on the unaudited interim
financial information because such reports are not a
report or a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Securities
Act.
118
RESERVES
The information regarding Freeport-McMoRans reserves as of
December 31, 2005, that is either in this document or
incorporated by reference to Freeport-McMoRans annual
report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005, has been reviewed and
verified by Independent Mining Consultants, Inc. This reserve
information has been included in this document and incorporated
by reference upon the authority of Independent Mining
Consultants, Inc. as experts in mining, geology and reserve
determination.
LEGAL
MATTERS
The validity of shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock to be
issued in the transaction will be passed upon for
Freeport-McMoRan by Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent,
Carrère & Denègre, L.L.P.
OTHER
MATTERS
As of the date of this document, the Freeport-McMoRan board of
directors and the Phelps Dodge board of directors know of no
matters that will be presented for consideration at their
respective special meetings other than as described in this
document. However, if any other matter shall properly come
before these special meetings or any adjournment or postponement
thereof and shall be voted upon, the proposed proxy will be
deemed to confer authority to the individuals named as
authorized therein to vote the shares represented by the proxy
as to any matters that fall within the purposes set forth in the
notice of special meeting.
Freeport-McMoRan
2007 Annual Meeting Proposals
Freeport-McMoRan shareholders who wish to present proposals for
inclusion in the proxy statement relating to
Freeport-McMoRans annual meeting of shareholders to be
held in 2007 may do so by following the procedures prescribed in
Rule 14a-8
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the
Freeport-McMoRan bylaws. To be eligible, shareholder proposals
must have been received by the Secretary of Freeport-McMoRan no
later than November 21, 2006.
Under the Freeport-McMoRan bylaws, if a shareholder wishes to
present a proposal before the 2007 Freeport-McMoRan annual
meeting but does not wish to have the proposal considered for
inclusion in Freeport-McMoRans proxy statement and proxy
card, such shareholder must also give written notice to the
Secretary of Freeport-McMoRan, Freeport-McMoRan
Copper & Gold Inc., 1615 Poydras Street, New Orleans,
Louisiana 70112. The Secretary must receive such notice not less
than 120 days nor more than 210 days prior to
May 4, 2007, provided that, if the 2007 Freeport-McMoRan
annual meeting is not held within 30 days before or
90 days after May 4, 2007, then such nomination must
be delivered to or mailed and received by the Secretary no later
than the close of business on the later of the 90th day
prior to such annual meeting or the 10th day following the
date on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is
first made.
Phelps
Dodge 2007 Annual Meeting Proposals
If the transaction is completed, Phelps Dodge will cease to be a
public company before its 2007 annual meeting of shareholders.
If the transaction is not completed, Phelps Dodge shareholders
who wished to present proposals at the 2007 annual meeting of
shareholders and wished to have those proposals included in the
proxy materials to be sent by Phelps Dodge to the shareholders
must have delivered the proposals to Phelps Dodge Corporation,
Attn: Assistant General Counsel and Secretary, One North Central
Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona
85004-4414
not later than December 15, 2006. All such proposals must
comply with the Phelps Dodge bylaws and the requirements of the
Securities and Exchange Commissions proxy rules, which are
contained in Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934.
119
Householding
of Freeport-McMoRan Proxy Materials
Freeport-McMoRan may now satisfy Securities and Exchange
Commission rules regarding delivery of proxy statements and
annual reports by delivering a single proxy statement and annual
report to an address shared by two or more Freeport-McMoRan
shareholders. This delivery method is referred to as
householding and can result in meaningful cost
savings for Freeport-McMoRan. In order to take advantage of this
opportunity, Freeport-McMoRan has delivered only one copy of
this document to multiple shareholders who share an address,
unless contrary instructions were received from affected
shareholders prior to the mailing date. We undertake to deliver
promptly upon written or oral request a separate copy of this
document to a shareholder at a shared address to which a single
copy of this document was delivered. If you hold
Freeport-McMoRan common stock as a registered shareholder and
prefer to receive a separate copy of this document either now or
in the future, please contact Georgeson Inc. toll-free at
(866) 767-8979.
If your stock is held through a broker or bank and you prefer to
receive separate copies of this document either now or in the
future, please contact your broker, bank, custodian or holder of
record of Freeport-McMoRan common stock.
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
Freeport-McMoRan has filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission a registration statement under the Securities Act
that registers the distribution to Phelps Dodge shareholders of
the shares of Freeport-McMoRan common stock to be issued in the
transaction. This document is part of that registration
statement and constitutes a prospectus of Freeport-McMoRan in
addition to being a proxy statement of Freeport-McMoRan and
Phelps Dodge for their respective special meetings. The rules
and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission allow
us to omit from this document certain information included in
the registration statement or in the exhibits to the
registration statement.
In addition, Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge file reports,
proxy statements and other information with the Securities and
Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended. You may read and copy this information at the
following location of the Securities and Exchange Commission:
Public Reference Room
100 F Street, N.E.
Room 1580
Washington, D.C. 20549
You may also obtain copies of this information by mail from the
Public Reference Section of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580,
Washington, D.C. 20549, at prescribed rates. You may obtain
information on the operation of the Securities and Exchange
Commissions Public Reference Room by calling the
Securities and Exchange Commission at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The Securities and Exchange Commission also maintains an
Internet worldwide web site that contains reports, proxy
statements and other information about issuers, like
Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge, who file electronically with
the Securities and Exchange Commission. The address of the site
is http://www.sec.gov.
The Securities and Exchange Commission allows Freeport-McMoRan
and Phelps Dodge to incorporate by reference information into
this document. This means that Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge
can disclose important information to you by referring you to
another document filed separately with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The information incorporated by reference
is considered to be a part of this document, except for any
information superseded by information that is included directly
in this document or incorporated by reference subsequent to the
date of this document.
120
This document incorporates by reference the documents listed
below that Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoRan previously filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. They contain
important information about the companies and their financial
condition.
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan Securities and
Exchange Commission Filings
|
|
Period or Date Filed
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
|
|
Fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005
|
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2006,
June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2006
|
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
|
|
Filed on January 17, 2006,
February 3, 2006, March 23, 2006, April 18, 2006,
May 3, 2006, May 5, 2006, June 5, 2006,
July 18, 2006, July 26, 2006, August 1, 2006,
August 10, 2006, September 12, 2006,
September 28, 2006, October 17, 2006, November 1,
2006, November 16, 2006, November 20, 2006,
January 16, 2007 and February 5, 2007
|
Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A
|
|
Filed on March 22, 2006
|
Phelps Dodge Securities and
Exchange Commission Filings
|
|
Period or Date Filed
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
|
|
Fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005
|
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2006,
June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2006
|
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
|
|
Filed on January 10, 2006,
January 31, 2006, February 6, 2006, February 7,
2006, February 14, 2006, February 15, 2006,
March 9, 2006, March 17, 2006, April 10, 2006,
April 27, 2006, June 2, 2006, June 26, 2006,
June 27, 2006, June 28, 2006, June 29, 2006,
July 5, 2006, July 11, 2006, July 17, 2006,
July 18, 2006, July 19, 2006, July 25, 2006,
July 26, 2006, July 28, 2006, August 14, 2006,
September 5, 2006, October 24, 2006, November 20,
2006 and January 29, 2007.
|
Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A
|
|
Filed on April 13, 2006 and
August 25, 2006
|
In addition, Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge also incorporate
by reference additional documents that either company may file
with the Securities and Exchange Commission between the date of
this document and the date of the Freeport-McMoRan special
meeting or the Phelps Dodge special meeting, respectively. These
documents include periodic reports, such as Annual Reports on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
and Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
as well as proxy statements.
Freeport-McMoRan has supplied all information contained or
incorporated by reference in this document relating to
Freeport-McMoRan, and Phelps Dodge has supplied all such
information relating to Phelps Dodge.
Documents incorporated by reference are available from
Freeport-McMoRan and Phelps Dodge without charge, excluding any
exhibits to those documents unless the exhibit is specifically
incorporated by reference as an exhibit in this document. You
can obtain documents incorporated by reference in this document
by requesting them in writing or by telephone from the
appropriate company at the following addresses:
|
|
|
Freeport-McMoRan Copper &
Gold Inc.
1615 Poydras Street
New Orleans, Louisiana 70112
Attention: Investor Relations
Telephone:
(504) 582-4000
|
|
Phelps Dodge Corporation
One North Central Avenue
Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4414
Attention: Corporate Secretary
Telephone: (602) 366-8100
|
121
If you wish to request documents, the applicable company
must receive your request by March 7, 2007 (which is five
business days before the scheduled date of the special meetings)
in order to receive them before the special meetings. You
will not be charged for any of these documents that you request.
If you request any documents that have been incorporated by
reference from Freeport-McMoRan or Phelps Dodge,
Freeport-McMoRan or Phelps Dodge will mail them to you by first
class mail, or another equally prompt means, as soon as
practicable after it receives your request.
Neither Freeport-McMoRan nor Phelps Dodge has authorized
anyone to give any information or make any representation about
the transaction or our companies that is different from, or in
addition to, that contained in this document or in any of the
materials that have been incorporated into this document.
Therefore, if anyone gives you information of this sort, you
should not rely on it. If you are in a jurisdiction where offers
to exchange or sell, or solicitations of offers to exchange or
purchase, the securities offered by this document or the
solicitation of proxies is unlawful, or if you are a person to
whom it is unlawful to direct these types of activities, then
the offer presented in this document does not extend to you. The
information contained in this document speaks only as of the
date of this document unless the information specifically
indicates that another date applies.
122
APPENDIX A
EXECUTION COPY
AGREEMENT
AND PLAN OF MERGER
dated as of
November 18, 2006
among
PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION,
FREEPORT-MCMORAN COPPER & GOLD INC.
and
PANTHER ACQUISITION CORPORATION
COMPOSITE COPY
INCLUDING AMENDMENT
DATED JANUARY 17, 2007
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
ARTICLE 1
Definitions
|
|
Section 1.01.
|
|
|
Definitions
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
|
Section 1.02.
|
|
|
Other Definitional and
Interpretative Provisions
|
|
|
A-6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 2
The Merger
|
|
Section 2.01.
|
|
|
The Merger
|
|
|
A-7
|
|
|
Section 2.02.
|
|
|
Conversion of Shares
|
|
|
A-7
|
|
|
Section 2.03.
|
|
|
Surrender and Payment
|
|
|
A-7
|
|
|
Section 2.04.
|
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
|
Section 2.05.
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
|
Section 2.06.
|
|
|
Fractional Shares
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
|
Section 2.07.
|
|
|
Withholding Rights
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
|
Section 2.08.
|
|
|
Lost Certificates
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 3
The Surviving
Corporation
|
|
Section 3.01.
|
|
|
Certificate of
Incorporation
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
|
Section 3.02.
|
|
|
Bylaws
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
|
Section 3.03.
|
|
|
Directors and
Officers
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 4
Representations and
Warranties of the Company
|
|
Section 4.01.
|
|
|
Corporate Existence and
Power
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
|
Section 4.02.
|
|
|
Corporate
Authorization
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
|
Section 4.03.
|
|
|
Governmental
Authorization
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
|
Section 4.04.
|
|
|
Non-contravention
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
|
Section 4.05.
|
|
|
Capitalization
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
|
Section 4.06.
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
|
Section 4.07.
|
|
|
SEC Filings and the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
|
Section 4.08.
|
|
|
Financial Statements
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
|
Section 4.09.
|
|
|
Disclosure Documents
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
|
Section 4.10.
|
|
|
Absence of Certain
Changes
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
|
Section 4.11.
|
|
|
No Undisclosed Material
Liabilities
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
|
Section 4.12.
|
|
|
Compliance with Laws and Court
Orders; Permits
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
|
Section 4.13.
|
|
|
Litigation
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
|
Section 4.14.
|
|
|
Finders Fees
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
|
Section 4.15.
|
|
|
Opinion of Financial
Advisor
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
|
Section 4.16.
|
|
|
Taxes
|
|
|
A-17
|
|
|
Section 4.17.
|
|
|
Employee Benefit
Plans
|
|
|
A-17
|
|
|
Section 4.18.
|
|
|
Environmental Matters
|
|
|
A-18
|
|
|
Section 4.19.
|
|
|
Agreements, Contacts and
Commitments
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
A-i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
Section 4.20.
|
|
|
Property and Title
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
|
Section 4.21.
|
|
|
Mineral Reserves and
Resources
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
|
Section 4.22.
|
|
|
Operational Matters
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
|
Section 4.23.
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
A-20
|
|
|
Section 4.24.
|
|
|
Intellectual Property
|
|
|
A-20
|
|
|
Section 4.25.
|
|
|
Sale of Certain Subsidiary
Shares
|
|
|
A-20
|
|
|
Section 4.26.
|
|
|
Antitakeover Statutes and
Rights Agreement
|
|
|
A-20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 5
Representations and
Warranties of Parent
|
|
Section 5.01.
|
|
|
Corporate Existence and
Power
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
|
Section 5.02.
|
|
|
Corporate
Authorization
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
|
Section 5.03.
|
|
|
Governmental
Authorization
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
|
Section 5.04.
|
|
|
Non-contravention
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
|
Section 5.05.
|
|
|
Capitalization
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
|
Section 5.06.
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
|
Section 5.07.
|
|
|
SEC Filings and the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
|
Section 5.08.
|
|
|
Financial Statements
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
|
Section 5.09.
|
|
|
Disclosure Documents
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
|
Section 5.10.
|
|
|
Absence of Certain
Changes
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
|
Section 5.11.
|
|
|
No Undisclosed Material
Liabilities
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
|
Section 5.12.
|
|
|
Compliance with Laws and Court
Orders; Permits
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
|
Section 5.13.
|
|
|
Litigation
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
|
Section 5.14.
|
|
|
Finders Fees
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
|
Section 5.15.
|
|
|
Opinion of Financial
Advisor
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
|
Section 5.16.
|
|
|
Taxes
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
|
Section 5.17.
|
|
|
Employee Benefit
Plans
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
|
Section 5.18.
|
|
|
Environmental Matters
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
|
Section 5.19.
|
|
|
Agreements, Contacts and
Commitments
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
|
Section 5.20.
|
|
|
Property and Title
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
|
Section 5.21.
|
|
|
Mineral Reserves and
Resources
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
|
Section 5.22.
|
|
|
Operational Matters
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
|
Section 5.23.
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
|
Section 5.24.
|
|
|
Intellectual Property
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
|
Section 5.25.
|
|
|
Aggregate Cash
Consideration
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
|
Section 5.26.
|
|
|
Contracts of Work
|
|
|
A-31
|
|
|
Section 5.27.
|
|
|
Sale of Certain Subsidiary
Shares
|
|
|
A-31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 6
Covenants of the
Company
|
|
Section 6.01.
|
|
|
Conduct of the
Company
|
|
|
A-31
|
|
|
Section 6.02.
|
|
|
Tax Matters
|
|
|
A-33
|
|
A-ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
Section 6.03.
|
|
|
Voting of Parent
Stock
|
|
|
A-33
|
|
|
Section 6.04.
|
|
|
Company Employee
Plans
|
|
|
A-33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 7
Covenants of Parent
|
|
Section 7.01.
|
|
|
Conduct of Parent
|
|
|
A-33
|
|
|
Section 7.02.
|
|
|
Obligations of Merger
Subsidiary
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
|
Section 7.03.
|
|
|
Voting of Shares
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
|
Section 7.04.
|
|
|
Director and Officer
Liability
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
|
Section 7.05.
|
|
|
Stock Exchange
Listing
|
|
|
A-36
|
|
|
Section 7.06.
|
|
|
Employee Matters
|
|
|
A-36
|
|
|
Section 7.07.
|
|
|
Certain Corporate Governance
Matters
|
|
|
A-37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 8
Covenants of Parent and
the Company
|
|
Section 8.01.
|
|
|
Reasonable Best
Efforts
|
|
|
A-37
|
|
|
Section 8.02.
|
|
|
Certain Filings
|
|
|
A-38
|
|
|
Section 8.03.
|
|
|
Joint Proxy Statement;
Registration Statement
|
|
|
A-38
|
|
|
Section 8.04.
|
|
|
Company Shareholder
Meeting
|
|
|
A-39
|
|
|
Section 8.05.
|
|
|
Parent Stockholder
Meeting
|
|
|
A-39
|
|
|
Section 8.06.
|
|
|
No Solicitation; Opportunity To
Match
|
|
|
A-39
|
|
|
Section 8.07.
|
|
|
Public Announcements
|
|
|
A-42
|
|
|
Section 8.08.
|
|
|
Further Assurances
|
|
|
A-42
|
|
|
Section 8.09.
|
|
|
Access to Information
|
|
|
A-42
|
|
|
Section 8.10.
|
|
|
Notices of Certain
Events
|
|
|
A-42
|
|
|
Section 8.11.
|
|
|
Affiliates
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
|
Section 8.12.
|
|
|
Section 16
Matters
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
|
Section 8.13.
|
|
|
Control of Operations
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 9
Conditions to the
Merger
|
|
Section 9.01.
|
|
|
Conditions to the Obligations
of Each Party
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
|
Section 9.02.
|
|
|
Conditions to the Obligations
of Parent and Merger Subsidiary
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
|
Section 9.03.
|
|
|
Conditions to the Obligations
of the Company
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 10
Termination
|
|
Section 10.01.
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
|
Section 10.02.
|
|
|
Effect of Termination
|
|
|
A-45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 11
Miscellaneous
|
|
Section 11.01.
|
|
|
Notices
|
|
|
A-46
|
|
|
Section 11.02.
|
|
|
Survival of Representations and
Warranties
|
|
|
A-46
|
|
|
Section 11.03.
|
|
|
Amendments and
Waivers
|
|
|
A-46
|
|
|
Section 11.04.
|
|
|
Fees And Expenses
|
|
|
A-47
|
|
A-iii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
Section 11.05.
|
|
|
Disclosure Letters
|
|
|
A-49
|
|
|
Section 11.06.
|
|
|
Binding Effect; Benefit;
Assignment
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
|
Section 11.07.
|
|
|
Specific Performance
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
|
Section 11.08.
|
|
|
Governing Law
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
|
Section 11.09.
|
|
|
Jurisdiction
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
|
Section 11.10.
|
|
|
WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
|
Section 11.11.
|
|
|
No Personal Liability
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
|
Section 11.12.
|
|
|
Counterparts;
Effectiveness
|
|
|
A-51
|
|
|
Section 11.13.
|
|
|
Entire Agreement
|
|
|
A-51
|
|
|
Section 11.14.
|
|
|
Severability
|
|
|
A-51
|
|
Company Disclosure Letter
Parent Disclosure Letter
A-iv
AGREEMENT
AND PLAN OF MERGER
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER (this Agreement)
dated as of November 18, 2006 among Phelps Dodge
Corporation, a New York corporation (the
Company), Freeport-McMoRan Copper &
Gold Inc., a Delaware corporation (Parent),
and Panther Acquisition Corporation, a New York corporation and
a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (Merger
Subsidiary).
W I T N E
S S E T H:
WHEREAS, the respective Boards of Directors of the Company and
Merger Subsidiary have approved and deemed it advisable that the
respective shareholders of the Company and Merger Subsidiary
approve and adopt this Agreement pursuant to which, among other
things, Parent would acquire the Company by means of a merger of
Merger Subsidiary with and into the Company on the terms and
subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement;
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Parent has approved and
deemed it advisable that the stockholders of Parent approve the
Parent Stock Issuance (as defined below) and the Parent Charter
Amendment (as defined below); and
WHEREAS, Parent, in its capacity as sole shareholder of Merger
Subsidiary, has agreed to approve and adopt this Agreement and
the Merger by unanimous written consent in accordance with the
requirements of New York Law as provided for herein and shall
approve and adopt this Agreement and the Merger immediately
after the execution of this Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1
Definitions
Section 1.01. Definitions. (a) As
used herein, the following terms have the following meanings:
Affiliate means, with respect to any Person,
any other Person directly or indirectly controlling, controlled
by, or under common control with such Person.
Applicable Law means, with respect to any
Person, any federal, state or local law (statutory, common or
otherwise), constitution, treaty, convention, ordinance, code,
rule, regulation, order, injunction, judgment, decree, ruling or
other similar requirement enacted, adopted, promulgated or
applied by a Governmental Authority that is binding upon or
applicable to such Person, as amended unless expressly specified
otherwise.
Business Day means a day, other than
Saturday, Sunday or other day on which commercial banks in New
York, New York are authorized or required by Applicable Law to
close.
Code means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended.
Company Balance Sheet means the consolidated
balance sheet of the Company as of September 30, 2006 set
forth in the Companys quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006.
Company Balance Sheet Date means
September 30, 2006.
Company Disclosure Letter means the
disclosure letter dated the date hereof regarding this Agreement
that has been provided by the Company to Parent and Merger
Subsidiary.
Company Employee Plans means each material
employee benefit plan, as defined in
Section 3(3) of ERISA, each employment, severance or
similar contract, plan, arrangement or policy and each other
plan or arrangement (written or oral) providing for
compensation, bonuses, profit-sharing, stock option or other
stock related rights or other forms of incentive or deferred
compensation, vacation benefits,
A-1
insurance (including any self-insured arrangements), health or
medical benefits, employee assistance program, disability or
sick leave benefits, workers compensation, supplemental
unemployment benefits, severance benefits and post-employment or
retirement benefits (including compensation, pension, health,
medical or life insurance benefits) which is maintained,
administered or contributed to by the Company or any ERISA
Affiliate and covers any U.S. employee or former
U.S. employee of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or
with respect to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries has
any liability.
Company International Plan means any
employment, severance or similar contract or arrangement
(whether or not written) or any plan, policy, fund, program or
arrangement or contract providing for severance, insurance
coverage (including any self-insured arrangements),
workers compensation, disability benefits, supplemental
unemployment benefits, vacation benefits, pension or retirement
benefits or for deferred compensation, profit-sharing, bonuses,
stock options, stock appreciation rights or other forms of
incentive compensation or post-retirement insurance,
compensation or benefits that (i) is not a Company Employee
Plan, (ii) is entered into, maintained, administered or
contributed to by the Company or any of its Affiliates and
(iii) covers any employee or former employee of the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries.
Company Preferred Stock Purchase Rights means
the rights issued by the Company pursuant to the Company
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights Agreement, as adjusted pursuant
to the terms thereof.
Company Preferred Stock Purchase Rights
Agreement means the 1998 Rights Agreement dated
February 5, 1998 between the Company and Chase Manhattan
Bank.
Company Stock means the Common Shares,
$6.25 par value, of the Company, together with the
associated Company Preferred Stock Purchase Rights.
Company
10-K
means the Companys annual report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
Competition Laws means statutes, rules,
regulations, orders, decrees, administrative and judicial
doctrines, and other laws that are designed or intended to
prohibit, restrict or regulate actions having the purpose or
effect of monopolization, lessening of competition or restraint
of trade.
Confidentiality Agreement means the
Confidentiality and Standstill Agreement dated and effective as
of November 6, 2006 between the Company and Parent.
Delaware Law means the General Corporation
Law of the State of Delaware.
EC Merger Regulation means Council Regulation
(EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004.
Environmental Laws means any Applicable Laws
or any agreement with any Governmental Authority or other Third
Party, relating to human health as it relates to exposure to
Hazardous Substances, the environment, mining closure,
reclamation, or closeout and related financial assurance
requirements or the regulation of hazardous or toxic substances
and wastes.
Environmental Permits means all Permits of
Governmental Authorities relating to or required by
Environmental Laws and affecting, or relating to, the business
of the relevant entity.
ERISA means the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974.
ERISA Affiliate of any entity means any other
entity that, together with such entity, would be treated as a
single employer under Section 414 of the Code.
GAAP means generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States.
Governmental Authority means any
transnational, domestic or foreign national, state or local,
governmental authority, department, court, agency or official,
including any political subdivision thereof.
Hazardous Substance means any pollutant,
contaminant, waste or chemical or any toxic, radioactive,
ignitable, corrosive, reactive or otherwise hazardous substance,
waste or material, or any substance,
A-2
waste or material having any constituent elements displaying any
of the foregoing characteristics, including any substance, waste
or material regulated under any Environmental Law.
HSR Act means the
Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976.
In The Money Amount means, with respect to a
stock option at any time, the amount, if any, by which the
aggregate fair market value at that time of the securities
subject to the option exceeds the aggregate exercise price under
the stock option.
Intellectual Property means all federal,
state, provincial, foreign and multinational intellectual and
industrial property rights, including, without limitation, all
(i) patents; (ii) copyrights; (iii) trademarks
and service marks, the goodwill of any business symbolized
thereby, and all common-law rights relating thereto;
(iv) Internet domain names; (v) trade secrets; and
(vi) all registrations, applications, and recordings
related to the foregoing.
IT Assets means computers, computer software,
firmware, middleware, servers, workstations, routers, hubs,
switches, data communications lines, and all other information
technology equipment, and all associated documentation owned by
the relevant party or its Subsidiaries or licensed or leased by
the relevant party or its Subsidiaries pursuant to written
agreement (excluding any public networks).
knowledge means (i) in respect of
Parent, the actual knowledge of the persons listed in
Section 1.01(a) of the Parent Disclosure Letter and
(ii) in respect of the Company, the actual knowledge of
persons listed in Section 1.01(a) of the Company Disclosure
Letter.
Lien means, with respect to any property or
asset, any mortgage, lien, pledge, charge, security interest,
encumbrance or other adverse claim of any kind in respect of
such property or asset. For purposes of this Agreement, a Person
shall be deemed to own subject to a Lien any property or asset
that it has acquired or holds subject to the interest of a
vendor or lessor under any conditional sale agreement, capital
lease or other title retention agreement relating to such
property or asset.
Material Adverse Effect means, with respect
to each party, any fact, change, event, occurrence or effect
that is materially adverse to the condition (financial or
otherwise), properties, assets, liabilities, obligations
(whether absolute, accrued, conditional or otherwise),
businesses, operations or results of operations of such party
and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, other than any such
fact, change, event, occurrence or effect relating to
(i) the announcement of the execution of this Agreement or
the transactions contemplated hereby, (ii) changes,
circumstances or conditions generally affecting the mining
industry, (iii) changes in general economic conditions in
the United States, (iv) changes in any of the principal
markets served by such partys business generally or
shortages or price changes with respect to raw materials, metals
or other products (including copper, gold and molybdenum) used
or sold by that party, (v) changes in generally Applicable
Laws (other than orders, judgments or decrees against such party
or any of its Subsidiaries or changes having a materially
disproportionate effect on such party in comparison to other
international mining companies) or (vi) changes in GAAP;
provided that in no event shall (i) a change in the trading
prices of a partys equity securities, or (ii) any
failure by a party to meet any internal or published
projections, forecasts or revenue or synergy or earnings
predictions (collectively Estimates) by
itself, be deemed to constitute a Material Adverse Effect (it
being understood that the foregoing shall not prevent a party
from asserting that any fact, change, event, occurrence or
effect that may have contributed to such change in trading
prices or Estimates independently constitutes a Material Adverse
Effect).
Multiemployer Plan means any multiemployer
plan, as defined in Section 3(37) of ERISA.
New York Law means the Business Corporation
Law of the State of New York.
1991 Contract of Work means the Contract of
Work, dated December 30, 1991, between the Government of
the Republic of Indonesia and P.T. Freeport Indonesia
Company.
1994 Contract of Work means the Contract of
Work, dated August 15, 1994, between the Government of the
Republic of Indonesia and P.T. Irja Eastern Minerals
Corporation.
A-3
1933 Act means the Securities Act of
1933.
1934 Act means the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934.
Parent Balance Sheet means the consolidated
balance sheet of Parent as of September 30, 2006 set forth
in Parents quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006.
Parent Balance Sheet Date means
September 30, 2006.
Parent Charter Amendment means the amendment
of Parents certificate of incorporation to
(i) increase the number of shares of capital stock
authorized thereunder to 750,000,000, (ii) increase the
number of shares of Parent Stock authorized thereunder to
700,000,000, (iii) rename the Parent Stock from
Class B common stock to common
stock and (iv) delete the provisions and references
to the previously designated classes and series of Parent
Preferred Stock of which no shares are outstanding as of the
date hereof (other than the Series A Participating
Cumulative Preferred Stock).
Parent Disclosure Letter means the Disclosure
Letter dated the date hereof regarding this Agreement that has
been provided by Parent to the Company.
Parent Employee Plans means each material
employee benefit plan, as defined in
Section 3(3) of ERISA, each employment, severance or
similar contract, plan, arrangement or policy and each other
plan or arrangement (written or oral) providing for
compensation, bonuses, profit-sharing, stock option or other
stock related rights or other forms of incentive or deferred
compensation, vacation benefits, insurance (including any
self-insured arrangements), health or medical benefits, employee
assistance program, disability or sick leave benefits,
workers compensation, supplemental unemployment benefits,
severance benefits and post-employment or retirement benefits
(including compensation, pension, health, medical or life
insurance benefits) which is maintained, administered or
contributed to by Parent or any ERISA Affiliate and covers any
U.S. employee or former U.S. employee of Parent or any
of its Subsidiaries, or with respect to which Parent or any of
its Subsidiaries has any liability.
Parent International Plan means any
employment, severance or similar contract or arrangement
(whether or not written) or any plan, policy, fund, program or
arrangement or contract providing for severance, insurance
coverage (including any self-insured arrangements),
workers compensation, disability benefits, supplemental
unemployment benefits, vacation benefits, pension or retirement
benefits or for deferred compensation, profit-sharing, bonuses,
stock options, stock appreciation rights or other forms of
incentive compensation or post-retirement insurance,
compensation or benefits that (i) is not a Parent Employee
Plan, (ii) is entered into, maintained, administered or
contributed to by Parent or any of its Affiliates and
(iii) covers any employee or former employee of Parent or
any of its Subsidiaries.
Parent Preferred Stock Purchase Rights means
the rights issued by Parent pursuant to the Parent Preferred
Stock Purchase Rights Agreement, as adjusted pursuant to the
terms thereof.
Parent Preferred Stock Purchase Rights
Agreement means the Rights Agreement dated May 3,
2000 between Parent and ChaseMellon Shareholder Services,
L.L.C., as amended.
Parent Stock means the Class B common
stock, $0.10 par value, of Parent, together with the
associated Parent Preferred Stock Purchase Rights (it being
understood that such Class B common stock may be renamed
pursuant to the Parent Charter Amendment).
Parent
10-K
means Parents annual report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
party means a party to this Agreement, and
parties means the parties to this Agreement,
collectively.
Person means an individual, corporation,
partnership, limited liability company, association, trust or
other entity or organization, including a government or
political subdivision or an agency or instrumentality thereof.
A-4
Proprietary Subject Matter means:
(i) all information (whether or not protectable by patent,
copyright, mask work or trade secret rights) not generally known
to the public, including know-how and show-how, discoveries,
processes, formulae, designs, methods, techniques, procedures,
concepts, specifications, technical manuals and data, libraries,
blueprints, drawings, product information, development
work-in-process,
inventions and trade secrets; (ii) patentable subject
matter, patented inventions and inventions subject to patent
applications; (iii) industrial models and industrial
designs; (iv) works of authorship, software and
copyrightable subject matter; (v) mask works; and
(vi) trademarks, trade names, service marks, brand names,
corporate names, emblems, logos, trade dress, domain names,
insignia and related marks.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act means the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
SEC means the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Stock Option Exchange Ratio means the sum of
(i) 0.67 plus (ii) the quotient of (A) the Cash
Consideration divided by (B) the closing price of a share
of Parent Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the trading
day immediately preceding the Effective Time.
Subsidiary means with respect to any Person,
any entity of which securities or other ownership interests
having ordinary voting power to elect a majority of the board of
directors or other persons performing similar functions are at
any time directly or indirectly owned by such Person.
Third Party means any Person, including as
defined in Section 13(d) of the 1934 Act, other than
Parent, the Company or any of their respective Affiliates.
(b) Each of the following terms is defined in the Section
set forth opposite such term:
|
|
|
Term
|
|
Section
|
|
Acquisition Proposal
|
|
8.06
|
Adjusted Option
|
|
2.04
|
Adjusted Option Exercise Price
|
|
2.04
|
Agreement
|
|
Preamble
|
Capex Budget
|
|
4.10
|
Certificates
|
|
2.03
|
Cash Consideration
|
|
2.02
|
Change in Recommendation
|
|
8.06
|
Citigroup
|
|
4.14
|
Company
|
|
Preamble
|
Company Board Recommendation
|
|
4.02
|
Company Employees
|
|
7.06
|
Company Insurance Policies
|
|
4.23
|
Company Intellectual Property
|
|
4.23
|
Company Preferred Stock
|
|
4.05
|
Company SEC Documents
|
|
4.07
|
Company Securities
|
|
4.05
|
Company Shareholder Approval
|
|
4.02
|
Company Shareholder Meeting
|
|
8.04
|
Company Stock Option
|
|
2.04
|
Company Subsidiary Securities
|
|
4.06
|
Company Termination Fee
|
|
11.04
|
Company-Used Proprietary Subject
Matter
|
|
4.23
|
Contract of Work
|
|
5.26
|
Effective Time
|
|
2.01
|
Employee Plans
|
|
4.17
|
A-5
|
|
|
Term
|
|
Section
|
|
End Date
|
|
10.01
|
Estimates
|
|
1.01
|
Exchange Agent
|
|
2.03
|
Expenses
|
|
11.04
|
Indemnified Person
|
|
7.04
|
Infringe
|
|
4.23
|
internal controls
|
|
4.07
|
Joint Proxy Statement
|
|
4.09
|
J.P. Morgan
|
|
5.14
|
Material Company Contract
|
|
4.19
|
Material Parent Contract
|
|
5.19
|
Merger
|
|
2.01
|
Merger Consideration
|
|
2.02
|
Merger Subsidiary
|
|
Preamble
|
Merrill Lynch
|
|
5.14
|
Morgan Stanley
|
|
4.14
|
No-Shop Party
|
|
8.06
|
Parent
|
|
Preamble
|
Parent Board Recommendation
|
|
5.02
|
Parent Insurance Policies
|
|
5.23
|
Parent Intellectual Property
|
|
5.24
|
Parent Preferred Stock
|
|
5.05
|
Parent SEC Documents
|
|
5.07
|
Parent Securities
|
|
5.05
|
Parent Stock Consideration
|
|
2.02
|
Parent Stock Issuance
|
|
5.02
|
Parent Stock Option
|
|
5.10
|
Parent Stockholder Approval
|
|
5.02
|
Parent Stockholder Meeting
|
|
8.05
|
Parent Subsidiary Securities
|
|
5.06
|
Parent Termination Fee
|
|
11.04
|
Parent-Used Proprietary Subject
Matter
|
|
5.24
|
Permits
|
|
4.12
|
Prior Plan
|
|
7.06
|
Registration Statement
|
|
4.09
|
Successor Plan
|
|
7.06
|
Superior Proposal
|
|
8.06
|
Surviving Corporation
|
|
2.01
|
Tax
|
|
4.16
|
Taxing Authority
|
|
4.16
|
Tax Return
|
|
4.16
|
Tax Sharing Agreements
|
|
4.16
|
Title IV Plan
|
|
4.17
|
Uncertificated Shares
|
|
2.03
|
Section 1.02. Other
Definitional and Interpretative Provisions. The
words hereof, herein and
hereunder and words of like import used in this
Agreement shall refer to this Agreement as a whole and not to
any particular provision of this Agreement. The captions herein
are included for convenience of reference
A-6
only and shall be ignored in the construction or interpretation
hereof. References to Articles, Sections, Exhibits and Schedules
are to Articles, Sections, Exhibits and Schedules of this
Agreement unless otherwise specified. Any capitalized terms used
in any Exhibit or Schedule but not otherwise defined therein,
shall have the meaning as defined in this Agreement. Any
singular term in this Agreement shall be deemed to include the
plural, and any plural term the singular. Whenever the words
include, includes or
including are used in this Agreement, they shall be
deemed to be followed by the words without
limitation, whether or not they are in fact followed by
those words or words of like import. Writing,
written and comparable terms refer to printing,
typing and other means of reproducing words (including
electronic media) in a visible form. References to any agreement
or contract are to that agreement or contract as amended,
modified or supplemented from time to time in accordance with
the terms hereof and thereof; provided that with respect to any
agreement or contract listed on any schedules hereto, all such
amendments, modifications or supplements must also be listed in
the appropriate schedule. References to any Person include the
successors and permitted assigns of that Person. References from
or through any date mean, unless otherwise specified, from and
including or through and including, respectively. References to
law, laws or to a particular statute or
law shall be deemed also to include any Applicable Law.
ARTICLE 2
The
Merger
Section 2.01. The
Merger. (a) At the Effective Time, Merger
Subsidiary shall be merged (the Merger) with
and into the Company in accordance with New York Law, whereupon
the separate existence of Merger Subsidiary shall cease, and the
Company shall be the surviving corporation (the
Surviving Corporation).
(b) Promptly after satisfaction or, to the extent permitted
hereunder, waiver of all conditions to the Merger, the Company
and Merger Subsidiary shall file a certificate of merger with
the New York Department of State and make all other filings or
recordings required by New York Law in connection with the
Merger. The Merger shall become effective at such time (the
Effective Time) as the certificate of merger
is duly filed with the New York Secretary of State (or at such
later time as may be specified in the certificate of merger).
(c) From and after the Effective Time, the Surviving
Corporation shall possess all the rights, privileges,
immunities, powers and purposes and shall assume and be liable
for all of the liabilities, obligations and penalties of the
Company and Merger Subsidiary, all as provided under New York
Law.
Section 2.02. Conversion
of Shares. At the Effective Time,
(a) except as otherwise provided in Section 2.02(b),
each share of Company Stock outstanding immediately prior to the
Effective Time shall be converted into the right to receive
(i) 0.67 shares of Parent Stock (together with the
cash in lieu of fractional shares of Parent Stock as specified
below, the Parent Stock Consideration), and
(ii) an amount in cash equal to $88.00, without interest
(the Cash Consideration). The Parent Stock
Consideration and the Cash Consideration shall be referred to
collectively herein as the Merger
Consideration;
(b) each share of Company Stock held by the Company as
treasury stock or owned by Parent immediately prior to the
Effective Time shall be canceled, and no payment shall be made
with respect thereto; and
(c) each share of common stock of Merger Subsidiary
outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be
converted into and become one share of common stock of the
Surviving Corporation with the same rights, powers and
privileges as the shares so converted and shall constitute the
only outstanding shares of capital stock of the Surviving
Corporation.
Section 2.03. Surrender
and Payment. (a) Prior to the Effective
Time, Parent shall appoint an agent reasonably satisfactory to
the Company (the Exchange Agent) for the
purpose of exchanging for the Merger Consideration
(i) certificates representing shares of Company Stock (the
Certificates) or (ii) uncertificated
A-7
shares of Company Stock (the Uncertificated
Shares). Parent shall make available to the Exchange
Agent, as needed, the Merger Consideration to be paid in respect
of the Certificates and the Uncertificated Shares. Promptly
after the Effective Time, Parent shall send, or shall cause the
Exchange Agent to send, to each holder of shares of Company
Stock at the Effective Time a letter of transmittal and
instructions (which shall specify that the delivery shall be
effected, and risk of loss and title shall pass, only upon
proper delivery of the Certificates or transfer of the
Uncertificated Shares to the Exchange Agent) for use in such
exchange, such letter of transmittal to be in such form and have
such other provisions as Parent and the Company shall reasonably
agree.
(b) Each holder of shares of Company Stock that have been
converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration
shall be entitled to receive, upon (i) surrender to the
Exchange Agent of a Certificate, together with a properly
completed letter of transmittal, or (ii) receipt of an
agents message by the Exchange Agent
(or such other evidence, if any, of transfer as the Exchange
Agent may reasonably request) in the case of a book-entry
transfer of Uncertificated Shares, the Merger Consideration in
respect of the Company Stock represented by a Certificate or
Uncertificated Share. The shares of Parent Stock constituting
part of such Merger Consideration, at Parents option,
shall be in uncertificated book-entry form, unless a physical
certificate is requested by a holder of shares of Company Stock
or is otherwise required under Applicable Law.
Until so surrendered or transferred, as the case may be, each
such Certificate or Uncertificated Share shall represent after
the Effective Time for all purposes only the right to receive
such Merger Consideration.
(c) If any portion of the Merger Consideration is to be
paid to a Person other than the Person in whose name the
surrendered Certificate or the transferred Uncertificated Share
is registered, it shall be a condition to such payment that
(i) either such Certificate shall be properly endorsed or
shall otherwise be in proper form for transfer or such
Uncertificated Share shall be properly transferred and
(ii) the Person requesting such payment shall pay to the
Exchange Agent any transfer or other taxes required as a result
of such payment to a Person other than the registered holder of
such Certificate or Uncertificated Share or establish to the
satisfaction of the Exchange Agent that such tax has been paid
or is not payable.
(d) After the Effective Time, there shall be no further
registration of transfers of shares of Company Stock. If, after
the Effective Time, Certificates or Uncertificated Shares are
presented to the Surviving Corporation, they shall be canceled
and exchanged for the Merger Consideration provided for, and in
accordance with the procedures set forth, in this Article 2.
(e) Any portion of the Merger Consideration made available
to the Exchange Agent pursuant to Section 2.03(a) that
remains unclaimed by the holders of shares of Company Stock six
months after the Effective Time shall be returned to Parent,
upon demand, and any such holder who has not exchanged shares of
Company Stock for the Merger Consideration in accordance with
this Section 2.03 prior to that time shall thereafter look
only to Parent for payment of the Merger Consideration, and any
dividends and distributions with respect thereto, in respect of
such shares without any interest thereon. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, Parent shall not be liable to any holder of shares of
Company Stock for any amounts paid to a public official pursuant
to applicable abandoned property, escheat or similar laws. Any
amounts remaining unclaimed by holders of shares of Company
Stock two years after the Effective Time (or such earlier date,
immediately prior to such time when the amounts would otherwise
escheat to or become property of any Governmental Authority)
shall become, to the extent permitted by Applicable Law, the
property of Parent free and clear of any claims or interest of
any Person previously entitled thereto.
(f) No dividends or other distributions with respect to
securities of Parent constituting part of the Merger
Consideration, and no cash payment in lieu of fractional shares
as provided in Section 2.06, shall be paid to the holder of
any Certificates not surrendered or of any Uncertificated Shares
not transferred until such Certificates or Uncertificated Shares
are surrendered or transferred, as the case may be, as provided
in this Section. Following such surrender or transfer, there
shall be paid, without interest, to the Person in whose name the
securities of Parent have been registered, at the time of such
surrender or transfer, the amount of any cash payable in lieu of
fractional shares to which such Person is entitled pursuant to
Section 2.06 and the
A-8
amount of all dividends or other distributions with a record
date after the Effective Time previously paid or payable on the
date of such surrender with respect to such securities.
Section 2.04. Stock
Options. (a) Except as provided in
Section 2.04(b), the terms of each outstanding option to
purchase shares of Company Stock under any employee stock option
or compensation plan or arrangement of the Company (a
Company Stock Option), whether or not
exercisable or vested, shall be adjusted as necessary to provide
that, at the Effective Time, each Company Stock Option
outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be
deemed to constitute a fully vested option (each, an
Adjusted Option) to acquire, on the same
terms and conditions, other than vesting, as were applicable
under such Company Stock Option, the number of shares of Parent
Stock equal to the product of (i) the number of shares of
Company Stock subject to such Company Stock Option immediately
prior to the Effective Time multiplied by (ii) the Stock
Option Exchange Ratio. The exercise price per share of Parent
Stock subject to any such Adjusted Option (the Adjusted
Option Exercise Price) will be an amount (rounded up
to the nearest one hundredth of a cent) equal to the quotient of
(A) the exercise price per share of Company Stock subject
to such Company Stock Option immediately prior to the Effective
Time divided by (B) the Stock Option Exchange Ratio;
provided that the exercise price otherwise determined shall be
increased to the extent, if any, required to ensure that the In
The Money Amount of the Adjusted Option immediately after the
adjustment is equal to the In The Money Amount of the
corresponding Company Stock Option immediately prior to the
exchange. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the exercise price of,
and number of shares subject to, (i) each Adjusted Option
shall be determined as necessary to comply with
Section 409A of the Code, and (ii) (x) any
fractional share of Parent Stock resulting from an aggregation
of all the shares of a holder subject to any Company Stock
Option shall be rounded down to the nearest whole share and
(y) for any Company Stock Option to which Section 421
of the Code applies by reason of its qualification under any of
Sections 422 through 424 of the Code, the option price, the
number of shares purchasable pursuant to such option and the
terms and conditions of exercise of such option shall be
determined in order to comply with Section 424 of the Code.
(b) Prior to the Effective Time, the Company shall
(i) use its reasonable best efforts to obtain any necessary
consents from holders of options to purchase shares of Company
Stock granted under the Companys stock option or
compensation plans or arrangements and (ii) make any
amendments to the terms of such stock option or compensation
plans or arrangements that are necessary to give effect to the
transactions contemplated by this Section 2.04.
(c) Parent shall take such actions as are necessary for the
assumption of the Company Stock Options pursuant to this
Section 2.04, including the reservation, issuance and
listing of Parent Stock, as is necessary to effectuate the
transactions contemplated by this Section 2.04. Parent
shall prepare and file with the SEC a registration statement on
an appropriate form, or a post-effective amendment to a
registration statement previously filed under the 1933 Act,
with respect to the shares of Parent Stock subject to the
Company Stock Options and, where applicable, shall use its
reasonable best efforts to have such registration statement
declared effective as soon as practicable following the
Effective Time and to maintain the effectiveness of such
registration statement covering such Company Stock Options (and
to maintain the current status of the prospectus contained
therein) for so long as such Company Stock Options remain
outstanding. With respect to those individuals, if any, who,
subsequent to the Effective Time, will be subject to the
reporting requirements under Section 16(a) of the
1934 Act, where applicable, Parent shall use all reasonable
efforts to administer the Company Stock Options assumed pursuant
to this Section 2.04 in a manner that complies with
Rule 16b-3
promulgated under the 1934 Act to the extent the Company
Stock Options complied with such rule prior to the Merger.
Section 2.05. Adjustments. If,
during the period between the date of this Agreement and the
Effective Time, any change in the outstanding shares of capital
stock of the Company or Parent shall occur, including by reason
of any reclassification, recapitalization, stock split or
combination, exchange or readjustment of shares, or any stock
dividend thereon with a record date during such period, but
excluding any change that results from any exercise of options
outstanding as of the date hereof to purchase shares of Company
Stock granted under the Companys stock option or
compensation plans or arrangements, the Merger Consideration and
any other amounts payable pursuant to this Agreement shall be
appropriately adjusted.
A-9
Section 2.06. Fractional
Shares. No fractional shares of Parent Stock
shall be issued in the Merger. All fractional shares of Parent
Stock that a holder of shares of Company Stock would otherwise
be entitled to receive as a result of the Merger shall be
aggregated and if a fractional share results from such
aggregation, such holder shall be entitled to receive, in lieu
thereof, an amount in cash without interest determined by
multiplying the closing sale price of a share of Parent Stock on
the New York Stock Exchange on the trading day immediately
preceding the Effective Time by the fraction of a share of
Parent Stock to which such holder would otherwise have been
entitled.
Section 2.07. Withholding
Rights. Each of the Surviving Corporation and
Parent shall be entitled to deduct and withhold from the
consideration otherwise payable to any Person pursuant to this
Article 2 such amounts as it is required to deduct and
withhold with respect to the making of such payment under any
provision of federal, state, local or foreign tax law. If the
Surviving Corporation or Parent, as the case may be, so
withholds amounts, such amounts shall be treated for all
purposes of this Agreement as having been paid to the holder of
the shares of Company Stock in respect of which the Surviving
Corporation or Parent, as the case may be, made such deduction
and withholding.
Section 2.08. Lost
Certificates. If any Certificate shall have been
lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the making of an affidavit of
that fact by the Person claiming such Certificate to be lost,
stolen or destroyed and, if required by the Surviving
Corporation, the posting by such Person of a bond, in such
reasonable amount as the Surviving Corporation may direct, as
indemnity against any claim that may be made against it with
respect to such Certificate, the Exchange Agent will issue, in
exchange for such lost, stolen or destroyed Certificate, the
Merger Consideration to be paid in respect of the shares of
Company Stock represented by such Certificate, as contemplated
by this Article 2.
ARTICLE 3
The
Surviving Corporation
Section 3.01. Certificate
of Incorporation. The certificate of
incorporation of the Company in effect at the Effective Time
shall be the certificate of incorporation of the Surviving
Corporation until amended in accordance with Applicable Law.
Section 3.02. Bylaws. The
bylaws of the Company in effect at the Effective Time shall be
the bylaws of the Surviving Corporation until amended in
accordance with Applicable Law.
Section 3.03. Directors
and Officers. From and after the Effective Time,
until successors are duly elected or appointed and qualified in
accordance with Applicable Law, (i) the directors of Merger
Subsidiary at the Effective Time shall be the directors of the
Surviving Corporation and (ii) the officers of the Company
at the Effective Time shall be the officers of the Surviving
Corporation.
ARTICLE 4
Representations
and Warranties of the Company
Subject to Section 11.05, except as set forth in the
Company Disclosure Letter or as disclosed in the Company SEC
Documents filed on or after December 31, 2005 and before
the date of this Agreement, the Company represents and warrants
to Parent that:
Section 4.01. Corporate
Existence and Power. The Company is a corporation
duly incorporated, validly existing and in good standing under
the laws of the State of New York and has all corporate powers
and all governmental licenses, authorizations, permits, consents
and approvals required to carry on its business as now
conducted, except for those licenses, authorizations, permits,
consents and approvals the absence of which would not reasonably
be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a
Material Adverse Effect with respect to the Company. The Company
is duly qualified to do business as a foreign corporation and is
in good standing in each jurisdiction where such qualification
is necessary, except for those jurisdictions where failure to be
so qualified would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a
A-10
Material Adverse Effect with respect to the Company. The Company
has heretofore made available to Parent true and complete copies
of the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of the Company as
currently in effect.
Section 4.02. Corporate
Authorization. (a) The execution, delivery
and performance by the Company of this Agreement and the
consummation by the Company of the transactions contemplated
hereby are within the Companys corporate powers and,
except for the required approval of the Companys
shareholders in connection with the consummation of the Merger,
have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action on
the part of the Company. The affirmative vote of the holders of
two-thirds of the outstanding shares of Company Stock is the
only vote of the holders of any of the Companys capital
stock necessary in connection with the consummation of the
Merger (the Company Shareholder Approval).
This Agreement constitutes a valid and binding agreement of the
Company.
(b) At a meeting duly called and held, the Companys
Board of Directors has (i) unanimously determined that this
Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby are fair to
and in the best interests of the Companys shareholders,
and declared the Merger and this Agreement to be advisable,
(ii) unanimously approved and adopted this Agreement and
the transactions contemplated hereby and (iii) unanimously
resolved (subject to Section 6.03) to recommend that the
Companys shareholders grant the Company Shareholder
Approval (such recommendation, the Company Board
Recommendation).
Section 4.03 Governmental
Authorization. The execution, delivery and
performance by the Company of this Agreement and the
consummation by the Company of the transactions contemplated
hereby require no action by or in respect of, or filing with,
any Governmental Authority, other than (i) the filing of a
certificate of merger with respect to the Merger with the New
York Department of State and appropriate documents with the
relevant authorities of other jurisdictions in which the Company
is qualified to do business, (ii) compliance with any
applicable requirements of the HSR Act, the EC Merger Regulation
and other Competition Laws, (iii) compliance with any
applicable requirements of the 1933 Act, the 1934 Act,
and any other applicable U.S. state or federal securities
laws, (iv) the New Jersey Industrial Site Recovery Act and
(v) any actions or filings the absence of which would not
be reasonably expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect with respect to the Company.
Section 4.04. Non-contravention. The
execution, delivery and performance by the Company of this
Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated
hereby do not and will not (i) contravene, conflict with,
or result in any violation or breach of any provision of the
certificate of incorporation or bylaws of the Company,
(ii) assuming compliance with the matters referred to in
Section 4.03, contravene, conflict with or result in a
violation or breach of any provision of any Applicable Law,
(iii) require any consent or other action by any Person
under, constitute a default, or an event that, with or without
notice or lapse of time or both, would constitute a default
under, or cause or permit the termination, cancellation,
acceleration or other change of any right or obligation or the
loss of any benefit to which the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries is entitled under (A) any provision of any
agreement or other instrument binding upon the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries or (B) any license, franchise, permit,
certificate, approval or other similar authorization affecting,
or relating in any way to, the assets or business of the Company
and its Subsidiaries or (iv) result in the creation or
imposition of any Lien on any asset of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, with such exceptions, in the case of each of
clauses (ii) through (iv), as would not be reasonably
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material
Adverse Effect with respect to the Company.
Section 4.05. Capitalization. (a) The
authorized capital stock of the Company consists of
(i) 300,000,000 shares of Company Stock and
(ii) 6,000,000 preferred shares, par value of
$1.00 per share (Company Preferred
Stock), of which 400,000 are designated Junior
Participating Cumulative Preferred Shares, and 2,000,000 are
designated 6.75% Series A Mandatory Convertible Preferred
Shares. As of November 17, 2006, there were outstanding
204,013,135 shares of Company Stock including
1,540,959 shares of restricted stock, no shares of Company
Preferred Stock, employee stock options to purchase an aggregate
of 529,254 shares of Company Stock (of which options to
purchase an aggregate of 183,824 shares of Company Stock
were exercisable) and 130,655 deferred stock units payable in
cash or Company Stock. All outstanding shares of capital stock
of the Company have been, and all shares that may be issued
pursuant to any compensatory plan or arrangement will be, when
issued in accordance with the respective terms thereof, duly
A-11
authorized and validly issued and are fully paid and
nonassessable. No Company Subsidiary or Affiliate owns any
shares of capital stock of the Company. For each officer of the
Company subject to Section 16 of the 1934 Act,
Section 4.05 of the Company Disclosure Letter contains a
complete and correct list of each outstanding employee stock
option to purchase shares of Company Stock, including the
holder, date of grant, exercise price, vesting schedule and
number of shares of Company Stock subject thereto.
(b) Except as set forth in this Section 4.05, and for
changes since November 17, 2006 resulting from the exercise
of employee stock options, the issuance of Common Stock or the
payment of cash in accordance with the settlement of deferred
share units and the grant of equity-based awards in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practices, there are no
outstanding (i) shares of capital stock or voting
securities of the Company, (ii) securities of the Company
convertible into or exchangeable for shares of capital stock or
voting securities of the Company or (iii) options or other
rights to acquire from the Company, or other obligation of the
Company to issue, any capital stock, voting securities or
securities convertible into or exchangeable for capital stock or
voting securities of the Company (the items in clauses (i),
(ii) and (iii) being referred to collectively as the
Company Securities). There are no outstanding
obligations of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to
repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any of the Company
Securities.
Section 4.06. Subsidiaries. (a) Each
Subsidiary of the Company is a corporation or other legal entity
duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the
laws of its jurisdiction of organization, has all corporate,
partnership or similar powers and all governmental licenses,
authorizations, permits, consents and approvals required to
carry on its business as now conducted, except for those
licenses, authorizations, permits, consents and approvals the
absence of which would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect with
respect to the Company. Each such Subsidiary is duly qualified
to do business as a foreign corporation or other foreign legal
entity and is in good standing in each jurisdiction where such
qualification is necessary, except for those jurisdictions where
failure to be so qualified would not reasonably be expected to
have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse
Effect with respect to the Company. All Significant Subsidiaries
(as defined in
Regulation S-X
of the 1934 Act) of the Company and their respective
jurisdictions of organization are identified in the Company
10-K.
Neither the Company nor its Subsidiaries directly or indirectly
owns any material interest or investment (whether equity or
debt) nor has any rights to acquire any material interest or
investment in any Person (other than a Subsidiary of the
Company).
(b) All of the outstanding capital stock of, or other
voting securities or ownership interests in, each Subsidiary of
the Company, is owned by the Company, directly or indirectly,
free and clear of any Lien and free of any other limitation or
restriction (including any restriction on the right to vote,
sell or otherwise dispose of such capital stock or other voting
securities or ownership interests). There are no outstanding
(i) securities of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
convertible into or exchangeable for shares of capital stock or
other voting securities or ownership interests in any Subsidiary
of the Company or (ii) options or other rights to acquire
from the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or other
obligations of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to issue,
any capital stock or other voting securities or ownership
interests in, or any securities convertible into or exchangeable
for any capital stock or other voting securities or ownership
interests in, any Subsidiary of the Company (the items in
clauses (i) and (ii) being referred to collectively as
the Company Subsidiary Securities). There are
no outstanding obligations of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries to repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any of
the Company Subsidiary Securities.
Section 4.07 SEC
Filings and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. (a) The
Company has filed all reports, schedules, forms, statements and
other documents required to be filed by the Company with the SEC
since January 1, 2003 pursuant to Sections 13(a) and
15(d) of the 1934 Act. The Company has made available to
Parent (i) the Companys annual reports on
Form 10-K
for its fiscal years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and
2003, (ii) its quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
for its fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2006, June 30,
2006 and September 30, 2006, (iii) its proxy or
information statements relating to meetings of, or actions taken
without a meeting by, the shareholders of the Company since
December 31, 2005, and (iv) all of its other reports,
statements, schedules and registration statements filed with the
SEC since December 31, 2005 (the documents referred to in
this Section 4.07(a), collectively, the Company
SEC Documents). For the purposes of this Agreement, a
document will be deemed available if it is accessible on-line
through the SECs EDGAR system
A-12
as of the date hereof. None of the Companys Subsidiaries
is required to file any other reports or documents with the SEC.
As of the date hereof, there are no outstanding written comments
from the SEC with respect to any of the Company SEC Documents.
(b) As of its filing date (or, if amended or superseded by
a filing prior to the date hereof, on the date of such filing),
each Company SEC Document complied in all material respects with
the requirements of the 1933 Act or the 1934 Act, as
the case may be, and the rules and regulations of the SEC
promulgated thereunder applicable to such Company SEC Document,
and did not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or
necessary in order to make the statements made therein, in the
light of the circumstances under which they were made, not
misleading.
(c) The Company has established and maintains disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15
under the 1934 Act). Such disclosure controls and
procedures are designed to ensure that material information
relating to the Company, including its consolidated
Subsidiaries, is made known to the Companys principal
executive officer and its principal financial officer by others
within those entities, particularly during the periods in which
the periodic reports required under the 1934 Act are being
prepared. Such disclosure controls and procedures are effective
in timely alerting the Companys principal executive
officer and principal financial officer to material information
required to be included in the Companys periodic reports
required under the 1934 Act.
(d) The Company and its Subsidiaries maintain a system of
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Rule 13a-15
under the 1934 Act) (internal controls)
sufficient to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of the Companys financial reporting and the
preparation of Company financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with GAAP. The Company has disclosed,
based on its most recent evaluation of internal controls prior
to the date hereof, to the Companys auditors and audit
committee (i) any significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information and (ii) any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in internal controls. The Company has made
available to Parent a summary of any such disclosure made by
management to the Companys auditors and audit committee
since January 1, 2003.
(e) There are no outstanding loans or other extensions of
credit made by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to any
executive officer (as defined in
Rule 3b-7
under the 1934 Act) or director of the Company. The Company
has not, since the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, taken
any action prohibited by Section 402 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act.
(f) Since January 1, 2004, the Company has complied in
all material respects with the applicable listing and corporate
governance rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange.
Section 4.08. Financial
Statements. The audited consolidated financial
statements and unaudited consolidated interim financial
statements (including, in each case, any related notes thereto)
of the Company included in the Company SEC Documents fairly
present in all material respects, in conformity with GAAP
applied on a consistent basis (except as may be indicated in the
notes thereto and subject to normal year-end adjustments in the
case of any unaudited interim financial statements), the
consolidated financial position of the Company and its
consolidated Subsidiaries as of the dates thereof and their
consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the
periods then ended (subject to normal year-end adjustments in
the case of any unaudited interim financial statements).
Section 4.09. Disclosure
Documents. The information supplied by the
Company for inclusion or incorporation by reference in the
registration statement on
Form S-4
or any amendment or supplement thereto pursuant to which shares
of Parent Stock issuable in the Parent Stock Issuance will be
registered with the SEC (the Registration
Statement) shall not at the time the Registration
Statement is declared effective by the SEC (or, with respect to
any post-effective amendment or supplement, at the time such
post-effective amendment or supplement becomes effective)
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements therein, in light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. The
information supplied by the Company for
A-13
inclusion in the joint proxy statement/prospectus, or any
amendment or supplement thereto, to be sent to the Company
shareholders and Parent stockholders in connection with the
Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement
(the Joint Proxy Statement) shall not, on the
date the Joint Proxy Statement, and any amendments or
supplements thereto, is first mailed to the shareholders of the
Company and the stockholders of Parent, at the time of the
Company Shareholder Approval, or at the time of the Parent
Stockholder Approval, contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated
therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in
light of the circumstances under which they were made, not
misleading. The representations and warranties contained in this
Section 4.09 will not apply to statements or omissions
included or incorporated by reference in the Joint Proxy
Statement based upon information furnished by Parent or any of
its representatives specifically for use or incorporation by
reference therein.
Section 4.10. Absence
of Certain Changes. (a) Since the Company
Balance Sheet Date there has not been any event, occurrence,
development or state of circumstances or facts that has had or
would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect with respect to the Company.
(b) Since the Company Balance Sheet Date through the date
of this Agreement, the business of the Company and its
Subsidiaries has been conducted in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practices and there has not been:
(i) any amendment of the articles of incorporation, bylaws
or other similar organizational documents (whether by merger,
consolidation or otherwise) of the Company;
(ii) any splitting, combination or reclassification of any
shares of capital stock of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries or declaration, setting aside or payment of any
dividend or other distribution (whether in cash, stock or
property or any combination thereof) in respect of its capital
stock, or redemption, repurchase or other acquisition or offer
to redeem, repurchase, or otherwise acquire any Company
Securities or any Company Subsidiary Securities, except for
(A) the cashless exercise of Company Stock Options in
accordance with the terms thereof, (B) dividends by any of
its Subsidiaries on a pro rata basis to the equity owners
thereof and (C) regular quarterly cash dividends with
customary record and payment dates on the shares of Company
Stock not in excess of $0.20 per share per quarter;
(iii) (A) any issuance, delivery or sale, or
authorization of the issuance, delivery or sale of, any shares
of any Company Securities or Company Subsidiary Securities,
other than (1) the issuance of any shares of the Company
Stock upon the exercise of Company Stock Options or in
settlement of any deferred share units, in either case in
accordance with the terms of the compensatory plans and other
instruments governing the exercise of such Company Stock Options
or the settlement of such deferred share units, (2) the
grant of equity-based awards in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practices and (3) the issuance of any
Company Subsidiary Securities to the Company or any other
Subsidiary or (B) amendment of any term of any Company
Security (in each case, whether by merger, consolidation or
otherwise other than as may be necessary or appropriate to
address the requirements of Section 409A of the Code and
any guidance promulgated thereunder, including, but not limited
to, any transitional rules or relief provided thereunder);
(iv) any incurrence of any capital expenditures or any
obligations or liabilities in respect thereof by the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries, except for those incurred in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;
(v) any acquisition (by merger, consolidation, acquisition
of stock or assets or otherwise), directly or indirectly, of any
material business;
(vi) any sale, lease, license (as licensor or licensee),
assignment, encumbrance or other transfer in one transaction or
any series of related transactions, of any material assets or
material rights, except for sales of inventory or obsolete
equipment in the ordinary course of business consistent with
past practices;
A-14
(vii) other than in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice or in connection with actions
permitted by Section 4.10(b)(iv), the making by the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries of any loans, advances or capital
contributions to, or investments in, any other Person;
(viii) the creation, incurrence or assumption by the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries of any indebtedness for
borrowed money or guarantees thereof other than
(A) short-term borrowings in the ordinary course of
business and in amounts and on terms consistent with past
practices, or (B) the pre-payment by the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries of any material long-term indebtedness for
borrowed money;
(ix) the entering into of (A) any copper hedging
transactions or (B) any other hedging transactions other
than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice;
(x) (A) the entering into of any agreement or
arrangement that limits or otherwise restricts in any material
respect the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their
respective Affiliates or any successor thereto or that could,
after the Effective Time, limit or restrict in any material
respect the Company, any of its Subsidiaries, the Surviving
Corporation, Parent or any of their respective Affiliates, from
engaging or competing in any line of business, in any location
or with any Person or (B) the entering into, amendment or
modification in any material respect or termination of any
Material Company Contract or waiver, release or assignment of
any material rights, claims or benefits of the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries other than in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice;
(xi) (A) With respect to any director, officer or
employee of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries whose annual
base salary exceeds $200,000, (1) the grant or increase of
any severance or termination pay (or amendment of any existing
severance pay or termination arrangement, other than as may be
necessary or appropriate to address the requirements of
Section 409A of the Code and any guidance promulgated
thereunder, including, but not limited to, any transitional
rules or relief provided thereunder) or (2) the entering
into of any employment, deferred compensation or other similar
agreement (or amendment of any such existing agreement, other
than as may be necessary or appropriate to address the
requirements of Section 409A of the Code and any guidance
promulgated thereunder, including, but not limited to, any
transitional rules or relief provided thereunder), (B) any
general increase in benefits payable under any existing
severance or termination pay policies, (C) the
establishment, adoption or amendment (except as required by
Applicable Law or to address the application of
Section 409A of the Code) of any collective bargaining,
bonus, profit-sharing, thrift, pension, retirement, deferred
compensation, stock option, restricted stock or other similar
benefit plan or arrangement or (D) any increase in
compensation, bonus or other benefits payable to any employee of
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, other than, in the case
of each of clauses (B)-(D), in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice;
(xii) any material labor dispute, other than routine
individual grievances, or any material activity or proceeding by
a labor union or representative thereof to organize any
employees of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, which
employees were not subject to a collective bargaining agreement
at the Company Balance Sheet Date, or any material lockouts,
strikes, slowdowns, work stoppages or, to the knowledge of the
Company, threats thereof by or with respect to such employees;
(xiii) any change in the Companys methods of
accounting in any material respect, except as required by
concurrent changes in GAAP or in
Regulation S-X
of the 1934 Act, as agreed to by its independent public
accountants;
(xiv) except as required by Applicable Law or any contract
or other written agreement entered into prior to the date
hereof, any material funding (or setting aside of material funds
for the purpose of funding) of any non-qualified pension,
environmental or other contingent liability; or
(xv) any settlement, or offer or proposal to settle,
(A) any material litigation, investigation, arbitration,
proceeding or other claim involving or against the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries, (B) any shareholder litigation or
dispute against the Company or any of its officers or directors
or (C) any litigation, arbitration, proceeding or dispute
that relates to the transactions contemplated hereby.
A-15
Section 4.11. No
Undisclosed Material Liabilities. There are no
liabilities or obligations of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries of any kind whatsoever, whether accrued,
contingent, absolute, determined, determinable or otherwise, and
there is no existing condition, situation or set of
circumstances that could reasonably be expected to result in
such a liability or obligation, other than:
(a) liabilities or obligations fully reflected or reserved
against in the Company Balance Sheet or described in the notes
thereto;
(b) liabilities or obligations disclosed in any Company SEC
Document filed after December 31, 2005 and prior to the
date of this Agreement;
(c) liabilities or obligations incurred in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practices since the
Company Balance Sheet Date; and
(d) liabilities or obligations that have not had and would
not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect with respect to the Company.
Section 4.12. Compliance
with Laws and Court Orders; Permits. (a) The
Company and each of its Subsidiaries is and has been, in
compliance with, and to the knowledge of the Company is not
under investigation with respect to and has not been threatened
to be charged with or given notice of any violation of any
Applicable Law, except for failures to comply or violations that
would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect with respect to the Company.
(b) Each of the Company and its Subsidiaries owns,
possesses or has obtained, and is in compliance with, all
licenses, permits, franchises, certificates, approvals or other
similar authorizations (Permits) of or from
any Governmental Authority necessary to conduct its business as
now conducted, except for such failures which have not had and
would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to the
Company.
Section 4.13. Litigation. There
is no action, suit, investigation or proceeding (or any basis
therefor) pending against, or, to the knowledge of the Company,
threatened against or affecting, the Company, any of its
Subsidiaries, any present or former officer, director or
employee of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or any Person
for whom the Company or any Subsidiary may be liable or any of
their respective properties before any court or arbitrator or
before or by any Governmental Authority that, if determined or
resolved adversely in accordance with the plaintiffs
demands, would reasonably be expected to have, individually or
in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect with respect to the
Company or that in any manner challenges or seeks to prevent,
enjoin, alter or materially delay the Merger or any of the other
transactions contemplated hereby. No judgment, decree,
injunction, rule or order of any Governmental Authority or
arbitrator is outstanding against the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries or their respective properties that has had or
would reasonably be expect to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on the Company.
Section 4.14. Finders
Fees. Except for Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
(Citigroup) and Morgan Stanley & Co.
Incorporated (Morgan Stanley), a copy of
whose engagement agreement has been provided to Parent, there is
no investment banker, broker, finder or other intermediary that
has been retained by or is authorized to act on behalf of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries who might be entitled to any
fee or commission from the Company or any of its Affiliates in
connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
Section 4.15. Opinion
of Financial Advisor. The Company has received
the opinions of Citigroup and Morgan Stanley, financial advisors
to the Company, to the effect that, as of the date of this
Agreement, the Merger Consideration to be received by the
holders of Company Stock pursuant to this Agreement is fair to
such holders from a financial point of view.
A-16
Section 4.16. Taxes. Except
as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to the
Company:
(a) All Tax Returns required by Applicable Law to be filed
with any Taxing Authority by, or on behalf of, the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries have been filed when due in accordance
with all Applicable Law, and all such Tax Returns are, or shall
be at the time of filing, true and complete in all material
respects.
(b) The Company and each of its Subsidiaries has timely
paid (or has had timely paid on its behalf) or has withheld and
timely remitted to the appropriate Taxing Authority all Taxes
due and payable, or, where payment is not yet due, has
established in accordance with GAAP an adequate accrual for all
material Taxes through the end of the last period for which the
Company and its Subsidiaries ordinarily record items on their
respective books.
(c) The income and franchise Tax Returns of the Company and
its Subsidiaries through the Tax year ended December 31,
1996 have been examined and closed or are Returns with respect
to which the applicable period for assessment under Applicable
Law, after giving effect to extensions or waivers, has expired.
(d) There is no claim, audit, action, suit, proceeding or
investigation now pending or, to the Companys knowledge,
threatened in writing against or with respect to the Company or
its Subsidiaries in respect of any Tax or Tax asset.
(e) During the five-year period ending on the date hereof,
neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries was a
distributing corporation or a controlled corporation in a
transaction intended to be governed by Section 355 of the
Code.
(f) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has
participated in any listed transaction within
the meaning of Treasury
Regulation Section 1.6011-4.
(g) Tax means (i) all income,
excise, gross receipts, ad valorem, value-added, sales, use,
employment, franchise, profits, gains, property, transfer,
payroll, intangibles or other taxes, fees, stamp taxes, duties,
charges, levies or assessments of any kind whatsoever (whether
payable directly or by withholding) together with any interest,
penalty, addition to tax or additional amount imposed by any
Governmental Authority (a Taxing Authority)
responsible for the imposition of any such tax (domestic or
foreign), and any liability for any of the foregoing as
transferee, (ii) in the case of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, liability for the payment of any amount of the
type described in clause (i) as a result of being or having
been before the Effective Time a member of an affiliated,
consolidated, combined or unitary group, or a party to any
agreement or arrangement, as a result of which liability of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries to a Taxing Authority is
determined or taken into account with reference to the
activities of any other Person, and (iii) liability of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries for the payment of any amount
as a result of being party to any Tax Sharing Agreement or with
respect to the payment of any amount imposed on any person of
the type described in (i) or (ii) as a result of any
existing express or implied agreement or arrangement (including
an indemnification agreement or arrangement). Tax
Return means any report, return, document, declaration
or other information or filing required to be supplied to any
Taxing Authority with respect to Taxes, including information
returns, any documents with respect to or accompanying payments
of estimated Taxes, or with respect to or accompanying requests
for the extension of time in which to file any such report,
return, document, declaration or other information. Tax
Sharing Agreements means all existing agreements or
arrangements (whether or not written) binding the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries that provide for the allocation,
apportionment, sharing or assignment of any Tax liability or
benefit, or the transfer or assignment of income, revenues,
receipts, or gains for the purpose of determining any
Persons Tax liability.
Section 4.17. Employee
Benefit Plans. (a) No accumulated
funding deficiency, as defined in Section 412 of the
Code, has been incurred with respect to any Company Employee
Plan subject to such Section 412, whether or not waived. No
reportable event, within the meaning of
Section 4043 of ERISA, other than a reportable
event that will not have a Material Adverse Effect with
respect to the Company, and no event described in
Section 4062 or 4063 of ERISA, has occurred in connection
with any Company Employee Plan. Neither the Company nor any
ERISA Affiliate of the Company has (i) engaged in, or is a
successor or parent corporation to an entity that has engaged
in, a transaction described in Sections 4069 or
A-17
4212(c) of ERISA or (ii) incurred, or reasonably expects to
incur prior to the Effective Time, (A) any material
liability under Title IV of ERISA arising in connection
with the termination of, or a complete or partial withdrawal
from, any plan covered or previously covered by Title IV of
ERISA or (B) any material liability under Section 4971
of the Code that in either case could become a liability of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries or Parent or any of its ERISA
Affiliates after the Effective Time.
(b) Each Company Employee Plan which is intended to be
qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code has received a
favorable determination letter, or has pending or has time
remaining in which to file, an application for such
determination from the Internal Revenue Service, and the Company
is not aware of any reason why any such determination letter
should be revoked or not be reissued. Each Company Employee Plan
has been maintained in material compliance with its terms and
with the requirements prescribed by any and all statutes,
orders, rules and regulations, including ERISA and the Code,
which are applicable to such Company Employee Plan, except for
such noncompliance that would not, individually or in the
aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect. To the Companys knowledge, no material events have
occurred with respect to any Company Employee Plan that could
result in payment or assessment by or against the Company of any
material excise taxes under the Code.
(c) There has been no amendment to, written interpretation
or announcement (whether or not written) by the Company or any
of its Affiliates relating to, or change in employee
participation or coverage under, any Company Employee Plan which
would increase materially the expense of maintaining such
Company Employee Plans above the level of the expense incurred
in respect thereof for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2005.
(d) All contributions and payments accrued under each
Company Employee Plan, determined in accordance with prior
funding and accrual practices, as adjusted to include
proportional accruals for the period ending as of the date
hereof, have been discharged and paid on or prior to the date
hereof except to the extent reflected as a liability on the
Company Balance Sheet.
(e) There is no action, suit, investigation, audit or
proceeding pending against or involving or, to the knowledge of
the Company, threatened against or involving, any Company
Employee Plan before any Governmental Authority that would
reasonably be expected, individually or in the aggregate, to
have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to the Company.
(f) Each Company International Plan has been maintained in
substantial compliance with its terms and with the requirements
prescribed by any and all applicable statutes, orders, rules and
regulations (including any special provisions relating to
qualified plans where such Company International Plan was
intended so to qualify) and has been maintained in good standing
with applicable regulatory authorities, except for such
noncompliance that would not, individually or in the aggregate,
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with
respect to the Company.
(g) Section 4.17(g) of the Company Disclosure Letter
contains a list of each Company executive officer or other key
employee with whom the Company has entered into an agreement
that provides for certain termination benefits specifically
related to the occurrence of a change of control of the Company,
and identifies the estimated aggregate costs of the payments and
benefits that would be payable in connection with a qualifying
termination pursuant to such agreements.
Section 4.18. Environmental
Matters. Except as to matters that would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect with respect to the Company:
(i) no written notice, notification, demand, request for
information, citation, summons or order has been received by and
no penalty has been assessed against the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries relating to or arising out of any Environmental Law;
(ii) no investigation, action, claim, suit, proceeding or
review is pending or, to the knowledge of the Company, is
threatened by any Governmental Authority or other Person
relating to the Company or any Subsidiary which allege a
violation of, or liability under, any Environmental Law;
A-18
(iii) the Company and its Subsidiaries are in compliance
with all Environmental Laws and all Environmental
Permits; and
(iv) there are no investigation or clean up liabilities or
obligations of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries of any
kind whatsoever, whether accrued, contingent, absolute,
determined, determinable or otherwise arising under any
Environmental Law or relating to any Hazardous Substance.
Section 4.19. Agreements,
Contacts and Commitments. The Company has
disclosed to Parent (prior to the date hereof with respect to
contracts existing on the date hereof) each material contract,
agreement, arrangement or understanding to which the Company and
each of its Subsidiaries is a party (each, a Material
Company Contract). Except for breaches, violations or
defaults which would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect with
respect to the Company, (i) each of the Material Company
Contracts is valid and in full force and effect, unamended, and
(ii) neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries, nor
to the Companys knowledge any other party to a Material
Company Contract, has violated any material provision of, or
committed or failed to perform any act which, with or without
notice, lapse of time, or both, would constitute a material
default under the provisions of any such Material Company
Contract, and neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries
has received written notice that it has breached, violated or
defaulted under, any of the material terms and conditions of any
of the Material Company Contracts. Neither the Company nor any
Subsidiary of the Company is a party to, or otherwise a
guarantor of or liable with respect to, any interest rate,
currency or other swap or derivative transaction, other than any
such transactions in the ordinary course of business.
Section 4.20. Property
and Title. Except for only such failures as would
not reasonably be expected, individually or in the aggregate, to
have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to the Company,
applying customary standards in the United States mining
industry, each of the Company and its Subsidiaries has, to the
extent necessary to permit the operation of their respective
businesses as presently conducted: (a) sufficient title,
clear of any title defect or Lien to its operating properties
and properties with estimated proven and probable mineral
reserves
and/or
estimated mineral resources (other than property to which it is
lessee, in which case it has a valid leasehold interest) and
(b) good and sufficient title to the real property
interests including, without limitation, fee simple estate of
and in real property, leases, easements, rights of way, permits,
mining claims, concessions or licenses from landowners or
authorities permitting the use of land by the Company and its
Subsidiaries. The Company and its Subsidiaries hold all mineral
rights required to continue their respective businesses and
operations as currently conducted and as proposed to be
conducted as disclosed in Company SEC Documents, except to the
extent that a failure to do so would not reasonably be expected,
individually or in the aggregate, to have a Material Adverse
Effect with respect to the Company. Except for such failures of
title or liens and royalty burdens that would not reasonably be
expected, individually or in the aggregate, to have a Material
Adverse Effect with respect to the Company, all mineral rights
held by the Company and its Subsidiaries are free and clear of
all Liens and royalty burdens. None of such mineral rights are
subject to reduction by reference to mine payout or otherwise
except for those created in the ordinary course of business and
which would not reasonably be expected, individually or in the
aggregate, to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to the
Company.
Section 4.21. Mineral
Reserves and Resources. The estimated proven and
probable mineral reserves disclosed in the Company SEC Documents
as of December 31, 2005 have been prepared and disclosed in
all material respects in accordance with all Applicable Laws.
There has been no material reduction (other than as a result of
operations in the ordinary course of business) in the aggregate
amount of estimated mineral reserves and estimated mineral
resources of the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole,
from the amounts disclosed in Company SEC Documents.
Section 4.22. Operational
Matters. Except as would not reasonably be
expected, individually or in the aggregate, to have a Material
Adverse Effect with respect to the Company:
(a) all rentals, royalties, overriding royalty interests,
production payments, net profits, interest burdens and other
payments due or payable on or prior to the date hereof under or
with respect to the direct or indirect assets of the Company and
its Subsidiaries have been properly and timely paid;
A-19
(b) all rentals, payments, and obligations due and payable
or performable on or prior to the date hereof under or on
account of any of the direct or indirect assets of the Company
and its Subsidiaries have been duly paid, performed, or provided
for prior to the date hereof;
(c) all (i) mines where the Company or a Subsidiary of
the Company is the operator at the relevant time have been
developed and operated in accordance with good mining practices
and in compliance with all then-Applicable Laws, (ii) mines
located in or on the lands of the Company or any Subsidiary, or
lands pooled or unitized therewith, which have been abandoned by
the Company or any Subsidiary, have been developed, managed, and
abandoned in accordance with good mining practices and in
compliance with all Applicable Laws, (iii) all future
abandonment, remediation and reclamation obligations have been
accurately disclosed in Company SEC Documents without omission
of information necessary to make the disclosure not misleading,
and (iv) all costs, expenses, and liabilities payable on or
prior to the date hereof under the terms of any Material Company
Contract have been properly and timely paid, except for such
expenses that are being currently paid prior to delinquency in
the ordinary course of business.
Section 4.23. Insurance. The
Company maintains insurance policies covering the assets,
business, equipment, properties, operations, employees, officers
and directors of the Company and its Subsidiaries (collectively,
the Company Insurance Policies) which are of
the type and in amounts which it believes are reasonably
appropriate to conduct its business. To the Companys
knowledge, there is no material claim by the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries pending under any of the material Company
Insurance Policies as to which coverage has been questioned,
denied or disputed by the underwriters of such policies or bonds
that would be reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse
Effect with respect to the Company.
Section 4.24. Intellectual
Property. Except as would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material
Adverse Effect with respect to the Company, (i) the Company
or one or more of its Subsidiaries is the owner or has the right
to use all Intellectual Property and Proprietary Subject Matter
used in the conduct of its business as it is currently conducted
(such Intellectual Property which is owned or used by the
Company or one of its Subsidiaries the Company
Intellectual Property and such Proprietary Subject
Matter the Company-Used Proprietary Subject
Matter), free and clear of all Liens; (ii) there
are no actions, suits, investigations or proceedings (or any
basis therefor) pending, or to the Companys knowledge,
threatened, respecting the ownership, validity, enforceability
or use of any Company Intellectual Property or Company-Used
Proprietary Subject Matter, and to the knowledge of the Company,
no facts or circumstances exist as a valid basis for same;
(iii) the Company Intellectual Property has not been, and
the Company has no reason to expect it to become, abandoned,
cancelled or invalidated; (iv) the Company and its
Subsidiaries have taken all reasonable actions to protect the
Company Intellectual Property, including the Company
Intellectual Property that is confidential in nature;
(v) to the knowledge of the Company, the conduct of the
business of the Company and its Subsidiaries as currently
conducted does not infringe, misappropriate, dilute or otherwise
violate or make unauthorized use of
(Infringe) any Intellectual Property of any
Person, and no Person is currently Infringing the Company
Intellectual Property; (vi) the Companys IT Assets
operate and perform in a manner that permits the Company and its
material Subsidiaries to conduct their respective businesses in
substantially the same manner as currently conducted and, to the
knowledge of the Company, no person has gained unauthorized
access to its IT Assets; and (vii) the Company and its
material Subsidiaries have implemented backup and disaster
recovery processes and practices with respect to the
Companys IT Assets consistent with industry practices.
Section 4.25. Sale
of Certain Subsidiary Shares. Neither the Company
nor any of its Subsidiaries has any obligation under any
Applicable Law or under any contract, agreement, understanding
or arrangement to sell or offer to sell to any party any shares
of any of its material Subsidiaries. Other than in respect of
sales of minority interests for cash at fair market value,
neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has received any
written notice from any Governmental Authority asserting that
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries has any obligation under
any Applicable Law or under any contract, agreement,
understanding or arrangement to sell or offer to sell to any
party any shares of any of its Subsidiaries.
Section 4.26. Antitakeover
Statutes and Rights Agreement. (a) The
Company has taken all action necessary to exempt the Merger,
this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby from
Section 912
A-20
of New York Law, and, accordingly, neither such Section nor any
other antitakeover or similar statute or regulation applies or
purports to apply to any such transactions. No other
control share acquisition, fair price,
moratorium or other antitakeover laws enacted under
U.S. state or federal laws apply to this Agreement or any
of the transactions contemplated hereby.
(b) The Company has taken all action necessary to render
the Company Preferred Stock Purchase Rights inapplicable to the
Merger, this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby.
ARTICLE 5
Representations
and Warranties of Parent
Subject to Section 11.05, except as set forth in the Parent
Disclosure Letter or as disclosed in the Parent SEC Documents
filed on or after December 31, 2005 and before the date of
this Agreement, Parent represents and warrants to the Company
that:
Section 5.01. Corporate
Existence and Power. Each of Parent and Merger
Subsidiary is a corporation duly incorporated, validly existing
and in good standing under the laws of its jurisdiction of
incorporation and has all corporate powers and all governmental
licenses, authorizations, permits, consents and approvals
required to carry on its business as now conducted, except for
those licenses, authorizations, permits, consents and approvals
the absence of which would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect with
respect to Parent. Parent is duly qualified to do business as a
foreign corporation and is in good standing in each jurisdiction
where such qualification is necessary, except for those
jurisdictions where failure to be so qualified would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect with respect to Parent.
Parent has heretofore made available to the Company true and
complete copies of the certificate of incorporation and bylaws
of Parent and Merger Subsidiary as currently in effect. Since
the date of its incorporation, Merger Subsidiary has not engaged
in any activities other than in connection with or as
contemplated by this Agreement.
Section 5.02. Corporate
Authorization. (a) The execution, delivery
and performance by Parent and Merger Subsidiary of this
Agreement and the consummation by Parent and Merger Subsidiary
of the transactions contemplated hereby are within the corporate
powers of Parent and Merger Subsidiary and, except for the
required approval of Parents stockholders in connection
with the consummation of the Parent Stock Issuance and the
Parent Charter Amendment, have been duly authorized by all
necessary corporate action. The affirmative vote of the holders
of (i) shares of Parent Stock representing a majority of
the votes cast by such holders is the only vote of the holders
of any of Parents capital stock necessary in connection
with the issuance of the Parent Stock Consideration in the
Merger (the Parent Stock Issuance) and
(ii) a majority of the outstanding shares of Parent Stock
is the only vote of the holders of any of Parents capital
stock necessary in connection with the consummation of the
Parent Charter Amendment (collectively, the Parent
Stockholder Approval). This Agreement constitutes a
valid and binding agreement of each of Parent and Merger
Subsidiary.
(b) At a meeting duly called and held, Parents Board
of Directors has (i) unanimously determined that this
Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby are fair to
and in the best interests of Parents stockholders and
declared the Merger and this Agreement to be advisable,
(ii) unanimously approved and adopted this Agreement and
the transactions contemplated hereby, (iii) unanimously
declared the advisability of and approved the Parent Charter
Amendment and (iv) unanimously resolved to recommend that
Parents stockholders grant the Parent Stockholder Approval
(such recommendation, the Parent Board
Recommendation).
Section 5.03. Governmental
Authorization. The execution, delivery and
performance by Parent and Merger Subsidiary of this Agreement
and the consummation by Parent and Merger Subsidiary of the
transactions contemplated hereby require no action by or in
respect of, or filing with, any Governmental Authority, other
than (i) the filing of a certificate of merger with respect
to the Merger with the New York Department of State and
appropriate documents with the relevant authorities of other
jurisdictions in which Parent is qualified to do business,
(ii) the filing of the Parent Charter Amendment with the
Delaware Secretary
A-21
of State, (iii) compliance with any applicable requirements
of the HSR Act, the EC Merger Regulation and other Competition
Laws, (iv) compliance with any applicable requirements of
the 1933 Act, the 1934 Act and any other applicable
U.S. state or federal securities laws and (v) any
actions or filings the absence of which would not be reasonably
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material
Adverse Effect with respect to Parent.
Section 5.04. Non-contravention. The
execution, delivery and performance by Parent and Merger
Subsidiary of this Agreement and the consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereby do not and will not
(i) contravene, conflict with, or result in any violation
or breach of any provision of the certificate of incorporation
or bylaws of Parent or Merger Subsidiary, (ii) assuming
compliance with the matters referred to in Section 5.03,
contravene, conflict with or result in a violation or breach of
any provision of any Applicable Law, (iii) require any
consent or other action by any Person under, constitute a
default, or an event that, with or without notice or lapse of
time or both, would constitute a default under, or cause or
permit the termination, cancellation, acceleration or other
change of any right or obligation or the loss of any benefit to
which Parent or any of its Subsidiaries is entitled under
(A) any provision of any agreement or other instrument
binding upon Parent or any of its Subsidiaries or (B) any
license, franchise, permit, certificate, approval or other
similar authorization affecting, or relating in any way to, the
assets or business of Parent and its Subsidiaries or
(iv) result in the creation or imposition of any Lien on
any asset of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, with such
exceptions, in the case of each of clauses (ii) through
(iv), as would not be reasonably expected to have, individually
or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect with respect to
Parent.
Section 5.05. Capitalization. (a) The
authorized capital stock of Parent consists of
(i) 423,600,000 shares of Parent Stock and
(ii) 50,000,000 preferred shares, par value $0.10 per
share (Parent Preferred Stock), of which
1,100,000 shares are designated
51/2% Convertible
Perpetual Preferred Stock and 2,500,000 are designated
Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock. As of
November 10, 2006, there were outstanding
196,942,871 shares, net of 112,961,136 treasury shares, of
Parent Stock and 1,099,985 shares of
51/2%
Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock. In addition to the
outstanding shares, (A) 22,658,130 shares of Parent
Stock are authorized for issuance upon conversion of the
51/2% Convertible
Perpetual Preferred Stock (not including the impact of the
$1.50 per share supplemental common stock dividend declared
on October 31, 2006 and payable December 29, 2006),
(B) 229,053 shares of Parent Stock are authorized for
issuance upon conversion of the 7% Convertible Senior Notes
due 2011 (not including the impact, if any, of the
$1.50 per share supplemental common stock dividend declared
on October 31, 2006 and payable December 29, 2006),
(C) 5,681,248 shares are authorized for issuance upon
exercise of employee stock options (of which 488,123 were
exercisable), and (D) 531,573 shares are authorized
for issuance upon the vesting of employee restricted stock
units. As of November 10, 2006, Parent also had 142,593
stock appreciation rights outstanding (of which 126,203 were
exercisable) which are settled in cash upon exercise and
67,965 shares of phantom stock outstanding to be settled in
cash. All outstanding shares of capital stock of Parent have
been, and all shares that may be issued pursuant to any
compensatory plan or arrangement will be, when issued in
accordance with the respective terms thereof, duly authorized
and validly issued and are fully paid and nonassessable. No
Parent Subsidiary or Affiliate owns any shares of capital stock
of Parent. For each officer of Parent subject to Section 16
of the 1934 Act, Section 5.05 of the Parent Disclosure
Letter contains a complete and correct list of each outstanding
employee stock option to purchase shares of Parent Stock,
including the holder, date of grant, exercise price, vesting
schedule and number of shares of Parent Stock subject thereto.
(b) Except as set forth in this Section 5.05, and for
changes since November 10, 2006 resulting from the issuance
of shares of Parent Stock pursuant to the conversion of Parent
Preferred Stock in accordance with the terms thereof, exercise
of employee stock options, the issuance of Parent Stock or the
payment of cash in accordance with the settlement of deferred
share units and the grant of equity-based awards in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practices, there are no
outstanding (i) shares of capital stock or voting
securities of Parent, (ii) securities of Parent convertible
into or exchangeable for shares of capital stock or voting
securities of Parent or (iii) options or other rights to
acquire from Parent or other obligation of Parent to issue, any
capital stock, voting securities or securities convertible into
or exchangeable for capital stock or voting securities of Parent
(the items in clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) being
referred to collectively as the Parent
A-22
Securities). There are no outstanding obligations
of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries to repurchase, redeem or
otherwise acquire any of the Parent Securities.
(c) The shares of Parent Stock to be issued as part of the
Merger Consideration have been duly authorized and, when issued
and delivered in accordance with the terms of this Agreement,
will have been validly issued and will be fully paid and
nonassessable and the issuance thereof is not subject to any
preemptive or other similar right.
Section 5.06. Subsidiaries. (a) Each
Subsidiary of Parent is a corporation or other legal entity duly
organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws
of its jurisdiction of organization, has all corporate,
partnership or similar powers and all governmental licenses,
authorizations, permits, consents and approvals required to
carry on its business as now conducted, except for those
licenses, authorizations, permits, consents and approvals the
absence of which would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect with
respect to Parent. Each such Subsidiary is duly qualified to do
business as a foreign corporation or other foreign legal entity
and is in good standing in each jurisdiction where such
qualification is necessary, except for those jurisdictions where
failure to be so qualified would not reasonably be expected to
have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse
Effect with respect to Parent. All Significant Subsidiaries (as
defined in
Regulation S-X
of the 1934 Act) of Parent and their respective
jurisdictions of organization are identified in the Parent
10-K.
Neither Parent nor its Subsidiaries directly or indirectly owns
any material interest or investment (whether equity or debt) nor
has any rights to acquire any material interest or investment in
any Person (other than a Subsidiary of Parent).
(b) All of the outstanding capital stock of, or other
voting securities or ownership interests in, each Subsidiary of
Parent, is owned by Parent, directly or indirectly, free and
clear of any Lien and free of any other limitation or
restriction (including any restriction on the right to vote,
sell or otherwise dispose of such capital stock or other voting
securities or ownership interests). There are no outstanding
(i) securities of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries
convertible into or exchangeable for shares of capital stock or
other voting securities or ownership interests in any Subsidiary
of Parent or (ii) options or other rights to acquire from
Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, or other obligations of
Parent or any of its Subsidiaries to issue, any capital stock or
other voting securities or ownership interests in, or any
securities convertible into or exchangeable for any capital
stock or other voting securities or ownership interests in, any
Subsidiary of Parent (the items in clauses (i) and
(ii) being referred to collectively as the Parent
Subsidiary Securities). There are no outstanding
obligations of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries to repurchase,
redeem or otherwise acquire any of the Parent Subsidiary
Securities.
Section 5.07. SEC
Filings and the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act. (a) Parent has filed all reports,
schedules, forms, statements, and other documents required to be
filed by Parent with the SEC since January 1, 2003 pursuant
to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the 1934 Act. Parent
has made available to the Company (i) Parents annual
reports on
Form 10-K
for its fiscal years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and
2003, (ii) its quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
for its fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2006, June 30,
2006 and September 30, 2006, (iii) its proxy or
information statements relating to meetings of, or actions taken
without a meeting by, the stockholders of Parent held since
December 31, 2005, and (iv) all of its other reports,
statements, schedules and registration statements filed with the
SEC since December 31, 2005 (the documents referred to in
this Section 5.07(a), collectively, the Parent SEC
Documents). For the purposes of this Agreement, a
document will be deemed available if it is accessible on-line
through the SECs EDGAR system as of the date hereof. None
of Parents Subsidiaries is required to file any other
reports or documents with the SEC. As of the date hereof, there
are no outstanding written comments from the SEC with respect to
any of the Parent SEC Documents.
(b) As of its filing date (or, if amended or superseded by
a filing prior to the date hereof, on the date of such filing),
each Parent SEC Document complied in all material respects with
the requirements of the 1933 Act or the 1934 Act, as
the case may be, and the rules and regulations of the SEC
promulgated thereunder applicable to such Parent SEC Document,
and did not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or
necessary in order to make the statements made therein, in the
light of the circumstances under which they were made, not
misleading.
A-23
(c) Parent has established and maintains disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15
under the 1934 Act). Such disclosure controls and
procedures are designed to ensure that material information
relating to Parent, including its consolidated Subsidiaries, is
made known to Parents principal executive officer and its
principal financial officer by others within those entities,
particularly during the periods in which the periodic reports
required under the 1934 Act are being prepared. Such
disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely
alerting Parents principal executive officer and principal
financial officer to material information required to be
included in Parents periodic reports required under the
1934 Act.
(d) Parent and its Subsidiaries maintain a system of
internal controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of Parents financial reporting
and the preparation of Parent financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with GAAP. Parent has disclosed, based on
its most recent evaluation of internal controls prior to the
date hereof, to Parents auditors and audit committee
(i) any significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal controls which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect Parents ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information and
(ii) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in
internal controls. Parent has made available to the Company a
summary of any such disclosure made by management to
Parents auditors and audit committee since January 1,
2003.
(e) There are no outstanding loans or other extensions of
credit made by Parent or any of its Subsidiaries to any
executive officer (as defined in
Rule 3b-7
under the 1934 Act) or director of Parent. Parent has not,
since the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, taken any action
prohibited by Section 402 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
(f) Since January 1, 2004, Parent has complied in all
material respects with the applicable listing and corporate
governance rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange.
Section 5.08. Financial
Statements. The audited consolidated financial
statements and unaudited consolidated interim financial
statements (including, in each case, any related notes thereto)
of Parent included in the Parent SEC Documents fairly present in
all material respects, in conformity with GAAP applied on a
consistent basis (except as may be indicated in the notes
thereto and subject to normal year-end adjustments in the case
of any unaudited interim financial statements), the consolidated
financial position of Parent and its consolidated Subsidiaries
as of the dates thereof and their consolidated results of
operations and cash flows for the periods then ended (subject to
normal year end adjustments in the case of any unaudited interim
financial statements).
Section 5.09. Disclosure
Documents. The information supplied by Parent for
inclusion or incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement shall not at the time the Registration Statement is
declared effective by the SEC (or, with respect to any
post-effective amendment or supplement, at the time such
post-effective amendment or supplement becomes effective)
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements therein, in light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. The
information supplied by Parent for inclusion in the Joint Proxy
Statement shall not, on the date the Joint Proxy Statement, and
any amendments or supplements thereto, is first mailed to the
stockholders of Parent and the shareholders of the Company, at
the time of the Company Shareholder Approval, or at the time of
the Parent Stockholder Approval, contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state any material fact required to
be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements
therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were
made, not misleading. The representations and warranties
contained in this Section 5.09 will not apply to statements
or omissions included or incorporated by reference in the Joint
Proxy Statement based upon information furnished by the Company
or any of its representatives specifically for use or
incorporation by reference therein.
Section 5.10. Absence
of Certain Changes. (a) Since the Parent
Balance Sheet Date there has not been any event, occurrence,
development or state of circumstances or facts that has had or
would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect with respect to Parent.
A-24
(b) Since the Parent Balance Sheet Date through the date of
this Agreement, the business of Parent and its Subsidiaries has
been conducted in the ordinary course of business consistent
with past practices and there has not been:
(i) any amendment of the articles of incorporation, bylaws
or other similar organizational documents (whether by merger,
consolidation or otherwise) of Parent;
(ii) any splitting, combination or reclassification of any
shares of capital stock of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries or
declaration, setting aside or payment of any dividend or other
distribution (whether in cash, stock or property or any
combination thereof) in respect of its capital stock, or
redemption, repurchase or other acquisition or offer to redeem,
repurchase, or otherwise acquire any Parent Securities or any
Parent Subsidiary Securities, except for (A) the cashless
exercise of Parent Stock Options in accordance with the terms
thereof, (B) dividends by any of its Subsidiaries on a pro
rata basis to the equity owners thereof, (C) regular
quarterly cash dividends with customary record and payment dates
on the shares of Parent Stock not in excess of $0.3125 per
share per quarter, (D) supplemental dividends authorized by
the Board of Directors of Parent prior to the date of this
Agreement and (E) purchases of Parent Stock pursuant to any
open market share purchase program authorized by the Board of
Directors of Parent;
(iii) (A) any issuance, delivery or sale, or
authorization of the issuance, delivery or sale of any shares of
any Parent Securities or Parent Subsidiary Securities, other
than the issuance of (B) any shares of Parent Stock upon
the exercise of any option to purchase shares of Parent Stock
under any employee stock option or compensation plan or
arrangement of Parent (each, a Parent Stock
Option) in accordance with the terms of those options,
(C) any Parent Subsidiary Securities to Parent or any other
Subsidiary, (D) amendment of any term of any Parent
Security or any Parent Subsidiary Security (in each case,
whether by merger, consolidation or otherwise, other than as may
be necessary or appropriate to address the requirements of
Section 409A of the Code and any guidance promulgated
thereunder, including, but not limited to, any transitional
rules or relief provided thereunder) and (E) shares of
Parent Stock pursuant to the conversion of Parent Preferred
Stock in accordance with the terms thereof;
(iv) any incurrence of any capital expenditures or any
obligations or liabilities in respect thereof by Parent or any
of its Subsidiaries, except for those incurred in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice;
(v) any acquisition (by merger, consolidation, acquisition
of stock or assets or otherwise), directly or indirectly, of any
material business;
(vi) any sale, lease, license (as licensor or licensee),
assignment, encumbrance or other transfer in one transaction or
any series of related transactions, of any material assets or
material rights, except for sales of inventory or obsolete
equipment in the ordinary course of business consistent with
past practice;
(vii) other than in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice or in connection with actions
permitted by Section 5.10(b)(iv), the making by Parent or
any of its Subsidiaries of any loans, advances or capital
contributions to, or investments in, any other Person;
(viii) the creation, incurrence or assumption by Parent or
any of its Subsidiaries of any indebtedness for borrowed money
or guarantees thereof other than (A) short-term borrowings
in the ordinary course of business and in amounts and on terms
consistent with past practices or (B) in connection with
the financing of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement;
(ix) the entering into of (A) any copper hedging
transactions or (B) any other hedging transactions other
than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice;
(x) (A) the entering into of any agreement or
arrangement that limits or otherwise restricts in any material
respect Parent or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their
respective Affiliates or any successor thereto or that could,
after the Effective Time, limit or restrict in any material
respect Parent, any of its Subsidiaries, the Surviving
Corporation, the Company or any of their respective Affiliates,
from engaging or competing in any line of business, in any
location or with any Person or (B) the entering into,
A-25
amendment or modification in any material respect or termination
of any Material Parent Contract or waiver, release or assignment
of any material rights, claims or benefits of Parent or any of
its Subsidiaries other than in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice;
(xi) (A) With respect to any director, officer or
employee of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries whose annual base
salary exceeds $200,000, (1) the grant or increase of any
severance or termination pay (or amendment of any existing
severance pay or termination arrangement, other than as may be
necessary or appropriate to address the requirements of
Section 409A of the Code and any guidance promulgated
thereunder, including, but not limited to, any transitional
rules or relief provided thereunder) or (2) the entering
into of any employment, deferred compensation or other similar
agreement (or amendment of any such existing agreement, other
than as may be necessary or appropriate to address the
requirements of Section 409A of the Code and any guidance
promulgated thereunder, including, but not limited to, any
transitional rules or relief provided thereunder), (B) any
general increase in benefits payable under any existing
severance or termination pay policies, (C) the
establishment, adoption or amendment (except as required by
Applicable Law or to address the application of
Section 409A of the Code) of any collective bargaining,
bonus, profit-sharing, thrift, pension, retirement, deferred
compensation, stock option, restricted stock or other similar
benefit plan or arrangement or (D) any increase in
compensation, bonus or other benefits payable to any employee of
Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, other than, in the case of
each of clauses (A)-(D), in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice;
(xii) any material labor dispute, other than routine
individual grievances, or any material activity or proceeding by
a labor union or representative thereof to organize any
employees of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, which employees
were not subject to a collective bargaining agreement at the
Parent Balance Sheet Date, or any material lockouts, strikes,
slowdowns, work stoppages or, to the knowledge of Parent,
threats thereof by or with respect to such employees;
(xiii) any change in Parents methods of accounting in
any material respect, except as required by concurrent changes
in GAAP or in
Regulation S-X
of the 1934 Act, as agreed to by its independent public
accountants;
(xiv) except as required by Applicable Law or any contract
or other written agreement entered into prior to the date
hereof, any material funding (or setting aside of material funds
for the purpose of funding) of any non qualified pension,
environmental or other contingent liability; or
(xv) any settlement, or offer or proposal to settle,
(A) any material litigation, investigation, arbitration,
proceeding or other claim involving or against Parent or any of
its Subsidiaries, (B) any stockholder litigation or dispute
against Parent or any of its officers or directors or
(C) any litigation, arbitration, proceeding or dispute that
relates to the transactions contemplated hereby.
Section 5.11. No
Undisclosed Material Liabilities. There are no
liabilities or obligations of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries
of any kind whatsoever, whether accrued, contingent, absolute,
determined, determinable or otherwise, and there is no existing
condition, situation or set of circumstances that could
reasonably be expected to result in such a liability or
obligation, other than:
(a) liabilities or obligations fully reflected or reserved
against in the Parent Balance Sheet or in the notes thereto;
(b) liabilities or obligations disclosed in any Parent SEC
Document filed after December 31, 2005 and prior to the
date of this Agreement;
(c) liabilities or obligations incurred in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practices since the
Parent Balance Sheet Date; and
(d) liabilities or obligations that have not had and would
not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect with respect to Parent.
Section 5.12. Compliance
with Laws and Court Orders;
Permits. (a) Parent and each of its
Subsidiaries is and has been, in compliance with, and to the
knowledge of Parent is not under investigation with respect
A-26
to and has not been threatened to be charged with or given
notice of any violation of any Applicable Law, except for
failures to comply or violations that would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material
Adverse Effect with respect to Parent.
(b) Each of Parent and its Subsidiaries owns, possesses or
has obtained, and is in compliance with, all Permits of or from
any Governmental Authority necessary to conduct its business as
now conducted, except for such failures which have not had and
would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to
Parent.
Section 5.13. Litigation. There
is no action, suit, investigation or proceeding (or any basis
therefor) pending against, or, to the knowledge of Parent,
threatened against or affecting, Parent, any of its
Subsidiaries, any present or former officer, director or
employee of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries or any Person for
whom Parent or any Subsidiary may be liable or any of their
respective properties before any court or arbitrator or before
or by any Governmental Authority that, if determined or resolved
adversely in accordance with the plaintiffs demands, would
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect with respect to Parent or
that in any manner challenges or seeks to prevent, enjoin, alter
or materially delay the Merger or any of the other transactions
contemplated hereby. No judgment, decree, injunction, rule or
order of any Governmental Authority or arbitrator is outstanding
against Parent or any of its Subsidiaries or their respective
properties that has had or would reasonably be expect to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on
Parent.
Section 5.14. Finders
Fees. Except for J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
(J.P. Morgan) and Merrill
Lynch & Co. (Merrill Lynch), a copy
of whose engagement agreement has been provided to the Company,
there is no investment banker, broker, finder or other
intermediary that has been retained by or is authorized to act
on behalf of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries who might be
entitled to any fee or commission from the Company or any of its
Affiliates in connection with the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement.
Section 5.15 Opinion
of Financial Advisor. Parent has received the
opinions of J.P. Morgan and Merrill Lynch., financial
advisors to Parent, to the effect that, as of the date of this
Agreement, the Merger Consideration is fair to Parent from a
financial point of view.
Section 5.16. Taxes. Except
as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to
Parent:
(a) All Tax Returns required by Applicable Law to be filed
with any Taxing Authority by, or on behalf of, Parent or any of
its Subsidiaries have been filed when due in accordance with all
Applicable Law, and all such Tax Returns are, or shall be at the
time of filing, true and complete in all material respects.
(b) Parent and each of its Subsidiaries has timely paid (or
has had timely paid on its behalf) or has withheld and timely
remitted to the appropriate Taxing Authority all Taxes due and
payable, or, where payment is not yet due, has established in
accordance with GAAP an adequate accrual for all material Taxes
through the end of the last period for which Parent and its
Subsidiaries ordinarily record items on their respective books.
(c) The income and franchise Tax Returns of Parent and its
Subsidiaries through the Tax year ended December 31, 1995
have been examined and closed or are Returns with respect to
which the applicable period for assessment under Applicable Law,
after giving effect to extensions or waivers, has expired.
(d) There is no claim, audit, action, suit, proceeding or
investigation now pending or, to Parents knowledge,
threatened in writing against or with respect to Parent or its
Subsidiaries in respect of any Tax or Tax asset.
(e) During the five-year period ending on the date hereof,
neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries was a distributing
corporation or a controlled corporation in a transaction
intended to be governed by Section 355 of the Code.
A-27
(f) Neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries has
participated in any listed transaction within the
meaning of Treasury
Regulation Section 1.6011-4.
Section 5.17. Employee
Benefit Plans. (a) No accumulated
funding deficiency, as defined in Section 412 of the
Code, has been incurred with respect to any Parent Employee Plan
subject to such Section 412, whether or not waived. No
reportable event, within the meaning of
Section 4043 of ERISA, other than a reportable
event that will not have a Material Adverse Effect with
respect to Parent, and no event described in Section 4062
or 4063 of ERISA, has occurred in connection with any Parent
Employee Plan. Neither Parent nor any ERISA Affiliate of Parent
has (i) engaged in, or is a successor or parent corporation
to an entity that has engaged in, a transaction described in
Sections 4069 or 4212(c) of ERISA or (ii) incurred, or
reasonably expects to incur prior to the Effective Time,
(A) any liability under Title IV of ERISA arising in
connection with the termination of, or a complete or partial
withdrawal from, any plan covered or previously covered by
Title IV of ERISA or (B) any liability under
Section 4971 of the Code that in either case could become a
liability of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries or the Company or
any of its ERISA Affiliates after the Effective Time.
(b) Each Parent Employee Plan which is intended to be
qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code has received a
favorable determination letter, or has pending or has time
remaining in which to file, an application for such
determination from the Internal Revenue Service, and Parent is
not aware of any reason why any such determination letter should
be revoked or not be reissued. Each Parent Employee Plan has
been maintained in material compliance with its terms and with
the requirements prescribed by any and all statutes, orders,
rules and regulations, including ERISA and the Code, which are
applicable to such Parent Employee Plan, except for such
noncompliance that would not, individually or in the aggregate,
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. To
Parents knowledge, no material events have occurred with
respect to any Parent Employee Plan that could result in payment
or assessment by or against Parent of any material excise taxes
under the Code.
(c) There has been no amendment to, written interpretation
or announcement (whether or not written) by Parent or any of its
Affiliates relating to, or change in employee participation or
coverage under, any Parent Employee Plan which would increase
materially the expense of maintaining such Parent Employee Plans
above the level of the expense incurred in respect thereof for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
(d) All contributions and payments accrued under each
Parent Employee Plan, determined in accordance with prior
funding and accrual practices, as adjusted to include
proportional accruals for the period ending as of the date
hereof, have been discharged and paid on or prior to the date
hereof except to the extent reflected as a liability on the
Parent Balance Sheet.
(e) There is no action, suit, investigation, audit or
proceeding pending against or involving or, to the knowledge of
Parent, threatened against or involving, any Parent Employee
Plan before any Governmental Authority that would reasonably be
expected, individually or in the aggregate, to have a Material
Adverse Effect with respect to Parent.
(f) Each Parent International Plan has been maintained in
substantial compliance with its terms and with the requirements
prescribed by any and all applicable statutes, orders, rules and
regulations (including any special provisions relating to
qualified plans where such Plan was intended so to qualify) and
has been maintained in good standing with applicable regulatory
authorities, except for such noncompliance that would not,
individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have
a Material Adverse Effect with respect to Parent.
(g) None of the transactions contemplated hereby is
considered to be a change of control for purposes of
any Parent Employee Plan (as specifically defined in each such
plan), and no employee or former employee of Parent or any of
its Subsidiaries will become entitled to any bonus, retirement,
severance, job security or similar benefit or enhanced such
benefit (including acceleration of vesting or exercise of an
incentive equity award) as a result of the transactions
contemplated hereby.
A-28
Section 5.18. Environmental
Matters. Except as to matters that would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect with respect to Parent:
(i) no written notice, notification, demand, request for
information, citation, summons or order has been received by and
no penalty has been assessed against Parent or any of its
Subsidiaries relating to or arising out of any Environmental Law;
(ii) no investigation, action, claim, suit, proceeding or
review is pending or, to the knowledge of Parent, is threatened
by any Governmental Authority or other Person relating to Parent
or any Subsidiary which allege a violation of, or liability
under, any Environmental Law;
(iii) Parent and its Subsidiaries are in compliance with
all Environmental Laws and all Environmental Permits; and
(iv) there are no investigation or clean up liabilities or
obligations of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries of any kind
whatsoever, whether accrued, contingent, absolute, determined,
determinable or otherwise arising under any Environmental Law or
relating to any Hazardous Substance.
Section 5.19. Agreements,
Contacts and Commitments. Parent has disclosed to
the Company (prior to the date hereof with respect to contracts
existing on the date hereof) each material contract, agreement,
arrangement or understanding to which Parent and each of its
Subsidiaries is a party (each, a Material Parent
Contract). Except for breaches, violations or defaults
which would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or
in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect with respect to
Parent, (i) each of the Material Parent Contracts is valid
and in full force and effect, unamended, and (ii) neither
Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries, nor to Parents
knowledge any other party to a Material Parent Contract, has
violated any material provision of, or committed or failed to
perform any act which, with or without notice, lapse of time, or
both, would constitute a material default under the provisions
of any such Material Parent Contract, and neither Parent nor any
of its Subsidiaries has received written notice that it has
breached, violated or defaulted under, any of the material terms
and conditions of any of the Material Parent Contracts. Neither
Parent nor any Subsidiary of Parent is a party to, or otherwise
a guarantor of or liable with respect to, any interest rate,
currency or other swap or derivative transaction, other than any
such transactions in the ordinary course of business.
Section 5.20. Property
and Title. Except for only such failures as would
not reasonably be expected, individually or in the aggregate, to
have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to Parent, applying
customary standards in the United States mining industry, each
of Parent and its Subsidiaries has, to the extent necessary to
permit the operation of their respective businesses as presently
conducted: (a) sufficient title, clear of any title defect
or Lien to its operating properties and properties with
estimated proven and probable mineral reserves
and/or
estimated mineral resources (other than property to which it is
lessee, in which case it has a valid leasehold interest) and
(b) good and sufficient title to the real property
interests including, without limitation, fee simple estate of
and in real property, leases, easements, rights of way, permits,
mining claims, concessions or licenses from landowners or
authorities permitting the use of land by Parent and its
Subsidiaries. Parent and its Subsidiaries hold all mineral
rights required to continue their respective businesses and
operations as currently conducted and as proposed to be
conducted as disclosed in Parent SEC Documents, except to the
extent that a failure to do so would not reasonably be expected,
individually or in the aggregate, to have a Material Adverse
Effect with respect to Parent. Except for such failures of title
or liens and royalty burdens that would not reasonably be
expected, individually or in the aggregate, to have a Material
Adverse Effect with respect to Parent, all mineral rights held
by Parent and its Subsidiaries are free and clear of all Liens
and royalty burdens. None of such mineral rights are subject to
reduction by reference to mine payout or otherwise except for
those created in the ordinary course of business and which would
not reasonably be expected, individually or in the aggregate, to
have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to Parent.
Section 5.21. Mineral
Reserves and Resources. The estimated proven and
probable mineral reserves disclosed in the Parent SEC Documents
as of December 31, 2005 have been prepared and disclosed in
all material respects in accordance with all Applicable Laws.
There has been no material reduction (other than as a result of
operations in the ordinary course of business) in the aggregate
amount of estimated mineral reserves
A-29
and estimated mineral resources of Parent and its Subsidiaries,
taken as a whole, from the amounts disclosed in Parent SEC
Documents.
Section 5.22. Operational
Matters. Except as would not reasonably be
expected, individually or in the aggregate, to have a Material
Adverse Effect with respect to Parent:
(a) all rentals, royalties, overriding royalty interests,
production payments, net profits, interest burdens and other
payments due or payable on or prior to the date hereof under or
with respect to the direct or indirect assets of Parent and its
Subsidiaries have been properly and timely paid;
(b) all rentals, payments, and obligations due and payable
or performable on or prior to the date hereof under or on
account of any of the direct or indirect assets of Parent and
its Subsidiaries have been duly paid, performed, or provided for
prior to the date hereof;
(c) all (i) mines where Parent or a Subsidiary of
Parent is the operator at the relevant time have been developed
and operated in accordance with good mining practices and in
compliance with all then-Applicable Laws, (ii) mines
located in or on the lands of Parent or any Subsidiary, or lands
pooled or unitized therewith, which have been abandoned by
Parent or any Subsidiary, have been developed, managed, and
abandoned in accordance with good mining practices and in
compliance with all Applicable Laws, (iii) all future
abandonment, remediation and reclamation obligations have been
accurately disclosed in Parent SEC Documents without omission of
information necessary to make the disclosure not misleading, and
(iv) all costs, expenses, and liabilities payable on or
prior to the date hereof under the terms of any Material Parent
Contract have been properly and timely paid, except for such
expenses that are being currently paid prior to delinquency in
the ordinary course of business.
Section 5.23. Insurance. Parent
maintains insurance policies covering the assets, business,
equipment, properties, operations, employees, officers and
directors of Parent and its Subsidiaries (collectively, the
Parent Insurance Policies) which are of the
type and in amounts which it believes are reasonably appropriate
to conduct its business. To Parents knowledge, there is no
material claim by Parent or any of its Subsidiaries pending
under any of the material Parent Insurance Policies as to which
coverage has been questioned, denied or disputed by the
underwriters of such policies or bonds that would be reasonably
likely to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to Parent.
Section 5.24. Intellectual
Property. Except as would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material
Adverse Effect with respect to Parent, (i) Parent or one or
more of its Subsidiaries is the owner or has the right to use
all Intellectual Property and Proprietary Subject Matter used in
the conduct of its business as it is currently conducted (such
Intellectual Property which is owned or used by Parent or one of
its Subsidiaries the Parent Intellectual
Property and such Proprietary Subject Matter the
Parent-Used Proprietary Subject Matter), free
and clear of all Liens; (ii) there are no actions, suits,
investigations or proceedings (or any basis therefor) pending,
or to Parents knowledge, threatened, respecting the
ownership, validity, enforceability or use of any Parent
Intellectual Property or Parent-Used Proprietary Subject Matter,
and to the knowledge of Parent, no facts or circumstances exist
as a valid basis for same; (iii) the Parent Intellectual
Property has not been, and Parent has no reason to expect it to
become, abandoned, cancelled or invalidated; (iv) Parent
and its Subsidiaries have taken all reasonable actions to
protect the Parent Intellectual Property, including the Parent
Intellectual Property that is confidential in nature;
(v) to the knowledge of Parent, the conduct of the business
of Parent and its Subsidiaries as currently conducted does not
Infringe any Intellectual Property of any Person, and no Person
is currently Infringing the Parent Intellectual Property;
(vi) the Parents IT Assets operate and perform in a
manner that permits Parent and its material Subsidiaries to
conduct their respective businesses in substantially the same
manner as currently conducted and to the knowledge of Parent, no
person has gained unauthorized access to its IT Assets; and
(vii) Parent and its material Subsidiaries have implemented
backup and disaster recovery processes and practices with
respect to Parents IT Assets consistent with industry
practices.
Section 5.25. Aggregate
Cash Consideration. Parent has or will have prior
to the Effective Time available to it sufficient funds to
deliver the aggregate Cash Consideration.
A-30
Section 5.26. Contracts
of Work. Neither Parent nor any of its
Subsidiaries has received any written notice from any
Governmental Authority that (i) Parent or any of its
Subsidiaries is in default under the 1991 Contract of Work or
the 1994 Contract of Work (each, a Contract of
Work), (ii) any Contract of Work is deemed to be
terminated, cancelled, void, voidable or without further force
and effect or (iii) any Governmental Authority has enacted
any Applicable Law that has modified or amended in any material
respect the terms, provisions or practical implementation of any
Contract of Work. There is no unresolved notice of breach or
violation from any Governmental Authority in respect of any
royalty, tax or reporting obligation in respect of any Contract
of Work.
Section 5.27. Sale
of Certain Subsidiary Shares. Neither Parent nor
any of its Subsidiaries has any obligation under any Applicable
Law or under any contract, agreement, understanding or
arrangement to sell or offer to sell to any party any shares of
any of its material Subsidiaries, including P.T. Freeport
Indonesia and P.T. Indocopper Investama. Other than in
respect of sales of minority interests for cash at fair market
value, neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries has received
any written notice from any Governmental Authority asserting
that Parent or any of its Subsidiaries has any obligation under
any Applicable Law or under any contract, agreement,
understanding or arrangement to sell or offer to sell to any
party any shares of any of its Subsidiaries, including
P.T. Freeport Indonesia and P.T. Indocopper Investama.
ARTICLE 6
Covenants
of the Company
The Company agrees that:
Section 6.01. Conduct
of the Company. From the date hereof until the
Effective Time, except as otherwise expressly contemplated or
permitted in this Agreement and except to the extent Parent
shall otherwise give its prior written consent, not to be
unreasonably withheld or delayed, the Company shall, and shall
cause each of its Subsidiaries to, conduct its business in the
ordinary course consistent with past practice and use its
reasonable best efforts consistent with past practices to
(i) preserve intact its present business organization,
(ii) maintain in effect all of its material Permits,
(iii) keep available the services of its directors,
officers and key employees and (iv) preserve in all
material respects its relationships with its material customers,
lenders, suppliers and others having material business
relationships with it. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, except as expressly contemplated by this Agreement or
as set forth in Section 6.01 of the Company Disclosure
Letter, without the prior written consent of Parent, not to be
unreasonably withheld or delayed, during the period from the
date hereof until the Effective Time, the Company shall not, nor
shall it permit any of its Subsidiaries to:
(a) amend the Companys articles of incorporation,
bylaws or other similar organizational documents (whether by
merger, consolidation or otherwise);
(b) split, combine or reclassify any shares of capital
stock of the Company or declare, set aside or pay any dividend
or other distribution (whether in cash, stock or property or any
combination thereof) in respect of the capital stock of the
Company or its Subsidiaries, or redeem, repurchase or otherwise
acquire or offer to redeem, repurchase, or otherwise acquire any
Company Securities or any Company Subsidiary Securities, except
for (i) the cashless exercise of Company Stock Options in
accordance with the terms thereof, (ii) dividends by any of
its Subsidiaries on a pro rata basis to the equity owners
thereof and (iii) regular quarterly cash dividends with
customary record and payment dates on the shares of Company
Stock not in excess of $0.20 per share per quarter;
(c) (i) issue, deliver or sell, or authorize the
issuance, delivery or sale of, any shares of any Company
Securities or Company Subsidiary Securities, other than the
issuance of any shares of the Company Stock (A) upon the
exercise of Company Stock Options or in settlement of any
deferred share units, in either case in accordance with the
terms of the compensatory plans and other instruments governing
the exercise of such Company Stock Options or the settlement of
such deferred share units, (B) the grant of equity-based
awards in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practices, and (C) the issuance of any Company Subsidiary
Securities to the Company or any other Subsidiary, or
A-31
(ii) amend any term of any Company Security (in each case,
whether by merger, consolidation or otherwise other than as may
be necessary or appropriate to address the requirements of
Section 409A of the Code and any guidance promulgated
thereunder, including, but not limited to, any transitional
rules or relief provided thereunder);
(d) incur any capital expenditures or any obligations or
liabilities in respect thereof;
(e) acquire (by merger, consolidation, acquisition of stock
or assets or otherwise), directly or indirectly, any material
business;
(f) sell, lease, license (as licensor or licensee), assign,
encumber or otherwise transfer in one transaction or any series
of related transactions, any material assets or material rights,
except for sales of inventory or obsolete equipment in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practices;
(g) other than in connection with capital expenditures
permitted in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, make
any loans, advances or capital contributions to, or investments
in, any other Person;
(h) (i) create, incur or assume any indebtedness for
borrowed money or guarantees thereof other than short-term
borrowings in the ordinary course of business and in amounts and
on terms consistent with past practices, or (ii) prepay any
material long-term indebtedness for borrowed money;
(i) enter into any (i) any copper hedging transactions
or (ii) any other hedging transactions other than in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;
(j) (i) enter into any agreement or arrangement that
limits or otherwise restricts in any material respect the
Company, any of its Subsidiaries or any of their respective
Affiliates or any successor thereto or that could, after the
Effective Time, limit or restrict in any material respect the
Company, any of its Subsidiaries, the Surviving Corporation,
Parent or any of their respective Affiliates, from engaging or
competing in any line of business, in any location or with any
Person or (ii) enter into, amend or modify in any material
respect or terminate any Material Company Contract or otherwise
waive, release or assign any material rights, claims or benefits
of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries other than in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;
(k) (i) with respect to any director, officer or
employee of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries whose annual
base salary exceeds $200,000, (A) grant or increase any
severance or termination pay to (or amend any existing severance
pay or termination arrangement, other than as may be necessary
or appropriate to address the requirements of Section 409A
of the Code and any guidance promulgated thereunder, including,
but not limited to, any transitional rules or relief provided
thereunder) or (B) enter into any employment, deferred
compensation or other similar agreement (or amend any such
existing agreement, other than as may be necessary or
appropriate to address the requirements of Section 409A of
the Code and any guidance promulgated thereunder, including, but
not limited to, any transitional rules or relief provided
thereunder), (ii) generally increase benefits payable under
any existing severance or termination pay policies,
(iii) establish, adopt or amend (except as required by
Applicable Law or to address the application of
Section 409A of the Code) any collective bargaining, bonus,
profit-sharing, thrift, pension, retirement, deferred
compensation, stock option, restricted stock or other similar
benefit plan or arrangement, (iv) increase compensation,
bonus or other benefits payable to any employee of the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries, or (v) grant or make any
equity-based awards, other than, in the case of each of
clauses (ii)-(v), in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice;
(l) change the Companys methods of accounting in any
material respect, except as required by concurrent changes in
GAAP or in
Regulation S-X
of the 1934 Act, as agreed to by its independent public
accountants;
(m) except as required by Applicable Law or any contract or
other written agreement entered into prior to the date hereof,
materially fund (or set aside any material funds for the purpose
of funding) any pension, environmental or other contingent
liability;
A-32
(n) settle, or offer or propose to settle, (i) any
material litigation, investigation, arbitration, proceeding or
other claim involving or against the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, (ii) any shareholder litigation or dispute
against the Company or any of its officers or directors or
(iii) any litigation, arbitration, proceeding or dispute
that relates to the transactions contemplated hereby; or
(o) agree, resolve or commit to do any of the foregoing.
Section 6.02. Tax
Matters. All transfer, documentary, sales, use,
stamp, registration, value added and other such Taxes and fees
(including any penalties and interest) incurred in connection
with the Merger (including any real property transfer tax and
any similar Tax) shall be paid by the Company when due, and the
Company shall, at its own expense, file all necessary Tax
returns and other documentation with respect to all such Taxes
and fees, and, if required by Applicable Law, the Company shall,
and shall cause its Affiliates to, join in the execution of any
such Tax returns and other documentation.
Section 6.03. Voting
of Parent Stock. The Company shall vote all
shares of Parent Stock beneficially owned by it or any of its
Subsidiaries in favor of the Parent Stock Issuance and the
Parent Charter Amendment at the Parent Stockholder Meeting.
Section 6.04. Company
Employee Plans. Within 30 days following the
execution hereof, the Company shall provide Parent, with respect
to each Company Employee Plan (other than a Multiemployer Plan),
a true and complete copy of: (i) each written Company
Employee Plan and any amendment thereto, a description of each
unwritten Company Employee Plan and any trust agreements,
insurance contracts or other arrangement pursuant to which
assets are held for the purpose of funding benefits under such
Company Employee Plan; (ii) the most recent annual report
(Form 5500 Series) and accompanying schedules, if any;
(iii) the most recent annual financial report, if any;
(iv) the most recent actuarial report, if any; and
(v) with respect to any Company Employee Plan that is
intended to comply with the requirements of Section 401(a)
of the Code, the most recent determination letter received with
respect to such plan. Within 30 days following the
execution hereof, the Company shall identify to Parent in
writing each Company Employee Plan that provides for
post-retirement health, medical or life insurance benefits for
retired, former or current employees of the Company or its
Subsidiaries (other than any such post-termination coverage
maintained to comply with the requirements of Section 601
of ERISA).
ARTICLE 7
Covenants
of Parent
Parent agrees that:
Section 7.01. Conduct
of Parent. From the date hereof until the
Effective Time, except as otherwise expressly contemplated or
permitted in this Agreement and except to the extent the Company
shall otherwise give its prior written consent, not to be
unreasonably withheld or delayed, Parent shall, and shall cause
each of its Subsidiaries to conduct its business in the ordinary
course consistent with past practice and use its reasonable best
efforts consistent with past practices to (i) preserve
intact its present business organization, (ii) maintain in
effect all of its material Permits, (iii) keep available
the services of its directors, officers and key employees and
(iv) preserve in all material respects its relationships
with its material customers, lenders, suppliers and others
having material business relationships with it. Without limiting
the generality of the foregoing, except as expressly
contemplated by this Agreement or as set forth in
Section 7.01 of the Parent Disclosure Letter, without the
prior written consent of Parent, not to be unreasonably withheld
or delayed, during the period from the date hereof until the
Effective Time, Parent shall not, nor shall it permit any of its
Subsidiaries to:
(a) amend Parents articles of incorporation, bylaws
or other similar organizational documents (whether by merger,
consolidation or otherwise);
(b) split, combine or reclassify any shares of capital
stock of Parent or declare, set aside or pay any dividend or
other distribution (whether in cash, stock or property or any
combination thereof) in respect of the capital stock of Parent
or its Subsidiaries, or redeem, repurchase or otherwise acquire
or offer to
A-33
redeem, repurchase, or otherwise acquire any Parent Securities
or any Parent Subsidiary Securities, except for (i) the
cashless exercise of Parent Stock Options in accordance with the
terms thereof, (ii) dividends by any of its Subsidiaries on
a pro rata basis to the equity owners thereof,
(iii) regular quarterly cash dividends with customary
record and payment dates on the shares of Parent Stock not in
excess of $0.3125 per share per quarter,
(iv) supplemental dividends authorized by the Board of
Directors of Parent prior to the date of this Agreement and
(v) purchases of Parent Stock pursuant to any open market
share purchase program authorized by the Board of Directors of
Parent;
(c) (i) issue, deliver or sell, or authorize the
issuance, delivery or sale of, any shares of any Parent
Securities or Parent Subsidiary Securities, other than
(A) the issuance of any shares of Parent Stock upon the
exercise of Parent Stock Options that are outstanding on the
date of this Agreement and issued after the date hereof in
compliance with the terms of this Agreement in accordance with
the terms of those options on the date of this Agreement,
(B) any Parent Subsidiary Securities to Parent or any other
Subsidiary or (C) the issuance of shares of Parent Stock
pursuant to the conversion of Parent Preferred Stock in
accordance with the terms thereof or (ii) amend any term of
any Parent Security or any Parent Subsidiary Security (in each
case, whether by merger, consolidation or otherwise other than
as may be necessary or appropriate to address the requirements
of Section 409A of the Code and any guidance promulgated
thereunder, including, but not limited to, any transitional
rules or relief provided thereunder);
(d) incur any capital expenditures or any obligations or
liabilities in respect thereof, except for those incurred in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practices;
(e) acquire (by merger, consolidation, acquisition of stock
or assets or otherwise), directly or indirectly, any material
business;
(f) sell, lease, license (as licensor or licensee), assign,
encumber or otherwise transfer in one transaction or any series
of related transactions, any material assets or material rights,
except for sales of inventory or obsolete equipment in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practices;
(g) other than in connection with capital expenditures
permitted in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, make
any loans, advances or capital contributions to, or investments
in, any other Person, other than in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice;
(h) create, incur or assume any indebtedness for borrowed
money or guarantees thereof other than (i) short-term
borrowings in the ordinary course of business and in amounts and
on terms consistent with past practices, or (ii) in
connection with the financing of the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement;
(i) enter into any (i) any copper hedging transactions
or (ii) any other hedging transactions other than in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;
(j) (i) enter into any agreement or arrangement that
limits or otherwise restricts in any material respect Parent,
any of its Subsidiaries or any of their respective Affiliates or
any successor thereto or that could, after the Effective Time,
limit or restrict in any material respect Parent, any of its
Subsidiaries, the Surviving Corporation, the Company or any of
their respective Affiliates, from engaging or competing in any
line of business, in any location or with any Person or
(ii) enter into, amend or modify in any material respect or
terminate any Material Parent Contract or otherwise waive,
release or assign any material rights, claims or benefits of
Parent or any of its Subsidiaries other than in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice;
(k) (i) with respect to any director, officer or
employee of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries whose annual base
salary exceeds $200,000, (A) grant or increase any
severance or termination pay to (or amend any existing severance
pay or termination arrangement, other than as may be necessary
or appropriate to address the requirements of Section 409A
of the Code and any guidance promulgated thereunder, including,
but not limited to, any transitional rules or relief provided
thereunder) or (B) enter into any employment, deferred
compensation or other similar agreement (or amend any such
existing agreement, other than as may be necessary or
appropriate to address the requirements of Section 409A of
the Code
A-34
and any guidance promulgated thereunder, including, but not
limited to, any transitional rules or relief provided
thereunder), (ii) generally increase benefits payable under
any existing severance or termination pay policies,
(iii) establish, adopt or amend (except as required by
Applicable Law or to address the application of
Section 409A of the Code) any collective bargaining, bonus,
profit-sharing, thrift, pension, retirement, deferred
compensation, stock option, restricted stock or other similar
benefit plan or arrangement, (iv) increase compensation,
bonus or other benefits payable to any employee of Parent or any
of its Subsidiaries, or (v) grant or make any equity-based
awards, other than, in the case of each of clauses (i)-(v),
in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;
(l) change Parents methods of accounting in any
material respect, except as required by concurrent changes in
GAAP or in
Regulation S-X
of the 1934 Act, as agreed to by its independent public
accountants;
(m) except as required by Applicable Law or any contract or
other written agreement entered into prior to the date hereof,
materially fund (or set aside any material funds for the purpose
of funding) any pension, environmental or other contingent
liability;
(n) settle, or offer or propose to settle, (i) any
material litigation, investigation, arbitration, proceeding or
other claim involving or against Parent or any of its
Subsidiaries, (ii) any stockholder litigation or dispute
against Parent or any of its officers or directors or
(iii) any litigation, arbitration, proceeding or dispute
that relates to the transactions contemplated hereby; or
(o) agree, resolve or commit to do any of the foregoing.
Section 7.02. Obligations
of Merger Subsidiary. Parent shall take all
action necessary to cause Merger Subsidiary to perform its
obligations under this Agreement and to consummate the Merger on
the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.
Section 7.03. Voting
of Shares. Parent shall vote all shares of
Company Stock beneficially owned by it or any of its
Subsidiaries in favor of adoption of this Agreement at the
Company Shareholder Meeting.
Section 7.04. Director
and Officer Liability. Parent shall and shall
cause the Surviving Corporation, and Parent and the Surviving
Corporation hereby agree, to do the following:
(a) For six years after the Effective Time, the Surviving
Corporation shall, and Parent shall cause the Surviving
Corporation to, indemnify and hold harmless the present and
former officers and directors of the Company (each an
Indemnified Person) in respect of acts or
omissions occurring at or prior to the Effective Time to the
fullest extent permitted by New York Law or any other Applicable
Law or provided under the Companys certificate of
incorporation and bylaws in effect on the date hereof; provided
that such indemnification shall be subject to any limitation
imposed from time to time under Applicable Law.
(b) For six years after the Effective Time, the Surviving
Corporation shall provide officers and directors
liability insurance in respect of acts or omissions occurring
prior to the Effective Time covering each such Indemnified
Person currently covered by the Companys officers
and directors liability insurance policy on terms with
respect to coverage and amount no less favorable than those of
such policy in effect on the date hereof.
(c) If Parent, the Surviving Corporation or any of their
respective successors or assigns (i) consolidates with or
merges into any other Person and shall not be the continuing or
surviving corporation or entity of such consolidation or merger,
or (ii) transfers or conveys all or substantially all of
its properties and assets to any Person, then, and in each such
case, proper provision shall be made so that the successors and
assigns of Parent or the Surviving Corporation, as the case may
be, shall assume the obligations set forth in this
Section 7.04.
(d) The rights of each Indemnified Person under this
Section 7.04 shall be in addition to any rights such Person
may have under the certificate of incorporation or bylaws of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or under New York Law or any
other Applicable Law or under any agreement of any
A-35
Indemnified Person with the Company or any of its Subsidiaries.
These rights shall survive consummation of the Merger and are
intended to benefit, and shall be enforceable by, each
Indemnified Person.
Section 7.05. Stock
Exchange Listing. Parent shall use its reasonable
best efforts to cause the shares of Parent Stock to be issued in
the Parent Stock Issuance to be listed on the New York Stock
Exchange, subject to official notice of issuance.
Section 7.06. Employee
Matters. (a) Subject to Applicable Law,
until December 31, 2007, Parent shall and shall cause its
Subsidiaries (including the Surviving Corporation) to provide to
the employees of the Company and its Subsidiaries who are
employees thereof as of the Effective Time (the Company
Employees) compensation (other than equity-based
compensation) and benefit plans substantially comparable in the
aggregate to those provided to the Company Employees immediately
prior to the Effective Time; provided that this
Section 7.06(a) shall not apply to any employees
represented by a union or employee association for purposes of
collective bargaining. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Parent
will continue all of the Companys existing retirement
plans (including but not limited to the Companys defined
benefit pension plans and Supplemental Retirement Plan) and
savings plans (including but not limited to the Supplemental
Savings Plan) until December 31, 2008.
(b) Each Company Employee will receive service credit for
all periods of employment with the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries or any predecessor thereof prior to the Effective
Time for purposes of vesting and eligibility under any employee
benefit plan in which such employee participates after the
Effective Time, to the extent that such service was recognized
under any analogous plan of such Company or Subsidiary in effect
immediately prior to the Effective Time; provided that no such
service credit for benefit accruals shall be given to the extent
that such credit would result in a duplication of benefits.
(c) If on or after the Effective Time, any Company Employee
becomes covered under any benefit plan providing medical,
dental, health, pharmaceutical or vision benefits (a
Successor Plan), other than the plan in which
he or she participated immediately prior to the Effective Time
(a Prior Plan), any such Successor Plan shall
not include any restrictions or limitations with respect to any
pre-existing condition exclusions and
actively-at-work
requirements (except to the extent such exclusions or
requirements were applicable under the corresponding Prior
Plan), and any eligible expenses incurred by such Company
Employee and his or her covered dependents during the calendar
year in which the Company Employee becomes covered under any
Successor Plan shall be taken into account under any such
Successor Plan for purposes of satisfying all deductible,
coinsurance and maximum
out-of-pocket
requirements applicable to such employee
and/or his
or her covered dependents for that year, to the extent that such
expenses were incurred during a period in which the Company
Employee or covered dependent was covered under a corresponding
Prior Plan.
(d) Except as otherwise specifically set forth above,
nothing contained herein shall be construed as requiring Parent,
its Affiliates, the Company or its Subsidiaries to continue any
specific Company Employee Plan or Parent Employee Plan, or to
continue the employment of any specific person. No Company
Employee shall have any third party beneficiary rights under, or
rights to any specific levels of compensation or benefits as a
result of the application of this Section 7.06.
(e) Within 30 days following the execution hereof,
Parent shall provide the Company, with respect to each Parent
Employee Plan (other than a Multiemployer Plan), a true and
complete copy of: (i) each written Parent Employee Plan and
any amendment thereto, a description of each unwritten Parent
Employee Plan and any trust agreements, insurance contracts or
other arrangement pursuant to which assets are held for the
purpose of funding benefits under such Parent Employee Plan;
(ii) the most recent annual report (Form 5500 Series)
and accompanying schedules, if any; (iii) the most recent
annual financial report, if any; (iv) the most recent
actuarial report, if any; and (v) with respect to any
Parent Employee Plan that is intended to comply with the
requirements of Section 401(a) of the Code, the most recent
determination letter received with respect to such plan. Within
30 days following the execution hereof, Parent shall
identify to the Company in writing each Parent Employee Plan
that provides for post-retirement health, medical or life
insurance benefits for retired, former or current employees of
Parent or its Subsidiaries (other than any such post-termination
coverage maintained to comply with the requirements of
Section 601 of ERISA).
A-36
Section 7.07. Certain
Corporate Governance Matters. Parent shall take
all actions necessary so that at the Effective Time (a) the
size of Parents Board of Directors shall be increased to
sixteen and (b) three independent members of the
Companys Board of Directors as of the date hereof shall
become members of Parents Board of Directors (it being
understood that the identity of such three members shall be
agreed upon by the Company and Parent prior to the Effective
Time). Each such former member of the Companys Board of
Directors shall be nominated for election to Parents Board
of Directors upon the expiration of his or her initial term of
office as a director of Parent.
ARTICLE 8
Covenants
of Parent and the Company
The parties hereto agree that:
Section 8.01. Reasonable
Best Efforts. (a) Subject to the terms and
conditions of this Agreement, each of the Company and Parent
shall use its reasonable best efforts to take, or cause to be
taken, all actions and to do, or cause to be done, and assist
the other party in doing, all things necessary, proper or
advisable under Applicable Law to consummate, in the most
expeditious manner practicable, the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement, including (i) preparing and filing as
promptly as practicable with any Governmental Authority or other
third party all documentation to effect all necessary filings,
notices, petitions, statements, registrations, submissions of
information, applications and other documents, and
(ii) obtaining and maintaining all approvals, consents,
registrations, permits, authorizations and other confirmations
required to be obtained from any Governmental Authority or other
third party that are necessary, proper or advisable to
consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. The
parties shall cooperate in all reasonable respects and will use
reasonable best efforts to contest any action or proceeding and
to have vacated, lifted, reversed or overturned any decree,
judgment, injunction or other order, whether temporary,
preliminary or permanent, that prohibits, prevents or restricts
the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement.
(b) In furtherance and not in limitation of the foregoing,
each of the Company and Parent shall make appropriate filings
pursuant to applicable Competition Laws, including an
appropriate filing of a Notification and Report Form pursuant to
the HSR Act and an appropriate filing pursuant to the EC Merger
Regulation, with respect to the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement as promptly as reasonably practicable and, in the
case of such Notification and Report Form pursuant to the HSR
Act, in any event within 15 Business Days of the date hereof.
Each of Parent and the Company shall supply as promptly as
reasonably practicable any additional information and
documentary material that may be requested pursuant to the HSR
Act or any other Competition Laws and shall take all other
actions reasonably necessary to cause the expiration or
termination of the applicable waiting periods under the HSR Act
and any other Competition Laws as soon as practicable.
(c) Each of the Company and Parent shall also use its
reasonable best efforts to keep the other party reasonably
informed, subject to ensuring that confidential competitively
sensitive information is exchanged among outside counsel only,
as to the status of the proceedings related to obtaining
approvals under the HSR Act and any other Competition Laws,
including providing such other party with copies of all material
related applications and notifications, consulting with the
other party to the extent practicable in advance of any meeting
or conference with any Governmental Authority and receiving the
prior written consent of the other party (such consent not to be
unreasonably withheld or delayed) before agreeing to extend any
waiting period under the HSR Act and any other Competition Laws
or entering into any agreement with any Governmental Authority
regarding any Competition Laws.
(d) The Company shall use its reasonable best efforts to
cooperate with Parent in its efforts to consummate the financing
of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. Such
reasonable best efforts shall include, to the extent reasonably
requested by Parent, (i) providing direct contact between
prospective lenders and the officers and directors of the
Company and its Subsidiaries, (ii) providing assistance in
preparation of confidential information memoranda, preliminary
offering memoranda, financial information and other materials to
be used in connection with obtaining such financing,
(iii) cooperation with the marketing efforts of Parent and
its financing sources for such financing, including
participation in management
A-37
presentation sessions, road shows and sessions with
rating agencies, (iv) providing assistance in obtaining any
consents of third parties necessary in connection with such
financing, (v) providing assistance in extinguishing
existing indebtedness of the Company and its Subsidiaries and
releasing liens securing such indebtedness, in each case to take
effect at the Effective Time, (vi) cooperation with respect
to matters relating to pledges of collateral to take effect at
the Effective Time in connection with such financing,
(vii) assisting Parent in obtaining legal opinions to be
delivered in connection with such financing,
(viii) assisting Parent in securing the cooperation of the
independent accountants of the Company and its Subsidiaries,
including with respect to the delivery of accountants
comfort letters, and (ix) providing the financial
information necessary for the satisfaction of the obligations
and conditions set forth in the commitment letter relating to
such financing within the time periods required thereby.
Section 8.02. Certain
Filings. The Company and Parent shall cooperate
with one another (i) in determining whether any action by
or in respect of, or filing with, any Governmental Authority is
required, or any actions, consents, approvals or waivers are
required to be obtained from parties to any material contracts,
in connection with the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement and (ii) in taking such
actions or making any such filings, furnishing information
required in connection therewith and seeking timely to obtain
any such actions, consents, approvals or waivers.
Section 8.03. Joint
Proxy Statement; Registration
Statement. (a) As promptly as practicable
after the date hereof, the Company and Parent shall prepare and
file the Joint Proxy Statement and the Registration Statement
(in which the Joint Proxy Statement will be included) with the
SEC. The Company and Parent shall use their reasonable best
efforts to cause the Registration Statement to become effective
under the 1933 Act as soon after such filing as practicable
and to keep the Registration Statement effective as long as is
necessary to consummate the Merger. Subject to
Section 8.06, the Joint Proxy Statement shall include the
recommendation of the Board of Directors of Parent in favor of
approval of the Parent Stock Issuance and the recommendation of
the Board of Directors of the Company in favor of approval and
adoption of this Agreement and the Merger. The Company and
Parent shall cooperate with one another in setting a mutually
acceptable date for the Company Shareholder Meeting and the
Parent Stockholder Meeting, so as to enable them to occur, to
the extent practicable, on the same date. The Company and Parent
each shall use its reasonable best efforts to cause the Joint
Proxy Statement to be mailed to its respective stockholders or
shareholders, as the case may be, as promptly as practicable
after the Registration Statement becomes effective. Each of the
Company and Parent shall promptly provide copies, consult with
each other and prepare written responses with respect to any
written comments received from the SEC with respect to the Joint
Proxy Statement and the Registration Statement and advise one
another of any oral comments received from the SEC. Each of the
Company and Parent shall use its reasonable best efforts to
ensure that the Registration Statement and the Joint Proxy
Statement comply in all material respects with the rules and
regulations promulgated by the SEC under the 1933 Act and
the 1934 Act, respectively.
(b) The Company and Parent shall make all necessary filings
with respect to the Merger and the transactions contemplated
hereby under the 1933 Act and the 1934 Act and
applicable state blue sky laws and the rules
and regulations thereunder. Each of the Company and Parent will
advise the other party, promptly after it receives notice
thereof, of the time when the Registration Statement has become
effective or any supplement or amendment has been filed, the
issuance of any stop order, the suspension of the qualification
of the Parent Stock issuable in connection with the Merger for
offering or sale in any jurisdiction, or any request by the SEC
for amendment of the Joint Proxy Statement or the Registration
Statement or comments thereon and responses thereto or requests
by the SEC for additional information. No amendment or
supplement to the Joint Proxy Statement or the Registration
Statement shall be filed without the approval of both the
Company and Parent, which approval shall not be unreasonably
withheld or delayed. If, at any time prior to the Effective
Time, any information relating to the Company or Parent, or any
of their respective Affiliates, officers or directors should be
discovered by the Company or Parent that should be set forth in
an amendment or supplement to the Registration Statement or the
Joint Proxy Statement so that such documents would not include
any misstatement of a material fact or omit to state any
material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in light
of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading,
the party hereto that discovers such information shall promptly
notify the other parties hereto and an appropriate amendment or
A-38
supplement describing such information shall be promptly filed
with the SEC and, to the extent required by law, disseminated to
the shareholders of the Company and the stockholders of Parent.
Section 8.04. Company
Shareholder Meeting. (a) Subject to
Section 8.06(b), the Company shall use its reasonable best
efforts to cause a meeting of its shareholders (the
Company Shareholder Meeting) to be held as
soon as reasonably practicable after the date hereof for the
purpose of voting on the approval and adoption of this Agreement
and the Merger.
(b) Subject to Section 8.06(b), the Company
(i) shall use its reasonable best efforts to obtain the
Company Shareholder Approval, (ii) shall recommend to all
holders of Company Stock that they vote in favor of this
Agreement and the Merger and the other transactions contemplated
hereby and (iii) shall not effect a Change in
Recommendation.
Section 8.05. Parent
Stockholder Meeting. (a) Subject to
Section 8.06(b), Parent shall use its reasonable best
efforts to cause a meeting of its stockholders (the
Parent Stockholder Meeting) to be held as
soon as reasonably practicable after the date hereof for the
purpose of voting on the Parent Stock Issuance and the Parent
Charter Amendment.
(b) Subject to Section 8.06(b), Parent (i) shall
use its reasonable best efforts to obtain the Parent Stockholder
Approval, (ii) shall recommend to all holders of Parent
Stock that they vote in favor of this Agreement, the Parent
Stock Issuance, the Parent Charter Amendment and the other
transactions contemplated hereby and (iii) shall not effect
a Change in Recommendation.
Section 8.06. No
Solicitation; Opportunity To
Match. (a) Neither the Company nor Parent
(each, a No-Shop Party) shall, directly or
indirectly, through any officer, director, employee,
representative (including for greater certainty any financial or
other advisors), agent or Subsidiary of such No-Shop Party:
(i) solicit, assist, initiate, encourage or otherwise
facilitate (including by way of furnishing non-public
information or permitting any visit to any facilities or
properties of such No-Shop Party or any of its Subsidiaries,
including any material mineral properties) any inquiries,
proposals or offers regarding any Acquisition Proposal;
(ii) engage in any discussions or negotiations regarding,
or provide any confidential information with respect to, any
Acquisition Proposal, provided that for greater certainty, such
No-Shop Party may advise any Person making an unsolicited
Acquisition Proposal that such Acquisition Proposal does not
constitute a Superior Proposal when such No-Shop Partys
Board of Directors has so determined;
(iii) withdraw, modify or qualify (or propose publicly to
or publicly state that it intends to withdraw, modify or
qualify) in any manner adverse to the other No-Shop Party, the
approval or recommendation of such No-Shop Partys Board of
Directors or any committee thereof of this Agreement; or approve
or recommend, or remain neutral with respect to, any Acquisition
Proposal (it being understood that publicly taking no position
or a neutral position with respect to an Acquisition Proposal
until 10 Business Days following the formal commencement of such
Acquisition Proposal shall not be considered to be in violation
of this Section 8.06(a)) (any such action by a No-Shop
Party described in this clause (iii) being referred to
herein as a Change in Recommendation of such
No-Shop Party); or
(iv) accept or enter into, or publicly propose to accept or
enter into, any letter of intent, agreement in principle,
agreement, arrangement or undertaking related to any Acquisition
Proposal.
(b) Notwithstanding Section 8.06(a) and any other
provision of this Agreement, each No-Shop Partys Board of
Directors shall be permitted to: (i) make a Change in
Recommendation in the circumstances permitted by
Section 8.06(f) (in which case such No-Shop Party will have
no further obligation under Section 8.04 or
Section 8.05, as applicable) or Section 8.06(j) (in
which case such No-Shop Party will have no further obligation
under Section 8.04(b) or Section 8.05(b), as
applicable);
and/or
(ii) engage in discussions or negotiations with, or provide
information to, any Person in response to an Acquisition
Proposal by any such Person, provided that (A) such No-Shop
Party has received an unsolicited bona fide written Acquisition
Proposal from such Person and such No-Shop Partys Board of
Directors has determined in good faith based on information then
available and after consultation with its financial advisors
that such Acquisition Proposal
A-39
constitutes a Superior Proposal or could reasonably be expected
to result in a Superior Proposal; and (B) prior to
providing any confidential information or data to such Person in
connection with such Acquisition Proposal, (x) such No-Shop
Partys Board of Directors receives from such Person an
executed confidentiality agreement containing terms not
materially less restrictive than those contained in the
Confidentiality Agreement, provided that any such
confidentiality agreement need not contain a
standstill or similar provision unless the
No-Shop Party so elects, and such No-Shop Party sends a copy of
any such confidentiality agreement to the other No-Shop Party
promptly upon its execution and promptly provides the other
No-Shop Party a list of, or in the case of information that was
not previously made available to the other No-Shop Party, copies
of, any information provided to such Person, and (y) such
No-Shop Party has complied in all material respects with
Section 8.06(d).
(c) Each No-Shop Party will cease and cause to be
terminated any existing solicitation, encouragement, activity,
discussion or negotiation with any Person by such No-Shop Party
or any of its Subsidiaries or any of its or their
representatives or agents with respect to any Acquisition
Proposal, whether or not initiated by such No-Shop Party, and,
in connection therewith, each No-Shop Party will discontinue
access to any data rooms (virtual or otherwise) and will request
(and reasonably exercise all rights it has to require) the
return or destruction of all information regarding such No-Shop
Party and its Subsidiaries previously provided to any such
Person or any other Person and will request (and reasonably
exercise all rights it has to require) the destruction of all
material including or incorporating or otherwise reflecting any
information regarding such No-Shop Party and its Subsidiaries.
Neither No-Shop Party shall terminate, amend, modify or waive
any provision of any confidentiality or standstill or similar
agreement to which such No-Shop Party or any of its Subsidiaries
is a party with any other Person, other than to allow such
Person to make and consummate a Superior Proposal.
(d) From and after the date of this Agreement, each No-Shop
Party shall promptly (and in any event within one Business Day)
notify the other No-Shop Party, at first orally and then in
writing, of any proposal or offer (or any amendment thereto)
constituting an Acquisition Proposal, any request for
representation on such No-Shop Partys Board of Directors,
or any request for non-public information relating to such
No-Shop Party or any Subsidiary or material mineral property of
such No-Shop Party relating to an Acquisition Proposal, of which
such No-Shop Partys directors, officers, representatives
or agents are or became aware. Such notice shall include a
description of the terms and conditions of, and the identity of
the Person making such proposal, inquiry, offer (including any
amendment thereto) or request, and shall include copies of any
such written proposal or offer or amendment to such proposal or
offer. Such No-Shop Party shall also provide such other details
of the proposal or offer, or any amendment thereto, as the other
No-Shop Party may reasonably request. Such No-Shop Party shall
keep the other No-Shop Party promptly and reasonably informed of
the status, including any change to the material terms, of any
such proposal or offer, or any amendment thereto, and will
respond promptly to all inquiries by the other No-Shop Party
with respect thereto.
(e) Each No-Shop Party shall ensure that its officers,
directors, representatives, agents and legal and financial
advisors, and its Subsidiaries and their officers, directors,
representatives, agents and legal and financial advisors, are
aware of the provisions of Section 8.06(a) to
Section 8.06(d) hereof, and shall be responsible for any
breach of such provisions by any of them or by any employee of
such No-Shop Party or any of its Subsidiaries.
(f) Neither No-Shop Party shall make any Change in
Recommendation in respect of, or enter into any agreement
relating to, an Acquisition Proposal (other than a
confidentiality agreement contemplated by
Section 8.06(b)(ii)(B) above) unless:
(i) the Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior
Proposal;
(ii) such No-Shop Party has provided the other No-Shop
Party with notice in writing that there is a Superior Proposal
together with all documentation detailing the Superior Proposal
(including a copy of the confidentiality agreement between such
No-Shop Party and the Person making the Superior Proposal if not
previously delivered);
A-40
(iii) at least three Business Days shall have elapsed from
the date that the other No-Shop Party has received a copy of the
written proposal in respect of the purported Superior Proposal
(or any amendment or revision thereof);
(iv) if the other No-Shop Party has proposed to amend the
terms of this Agreement in accordance with Section 8.06(g),
such No-Shop Partys Board of Directors (after receiving
advice from its financial advisors and outside legal counsel)
shall have determined in good faith that the Acquisition
Proposal continues to constitute a Superior Proposal after
taking into account such amendments;
(v) such No-Shop Partys Board of Directors, after
consultation with outside legal counsel, determines in good
faith that the failure to take such action would be inconsistent
with its fiduciary duties under Applicable Law; and
(vi) prior to or simultaneously with entering into an
agreement relating to such Superior Proposal (other than the
aforesaid confidentiality agreement) such No-Shop Party shall
have terminated this Agreement pursuant to
Section 10.01(c)(iv) or 10.01(d)(iv), as applicable, and
paid to the other No-Shop Party the Company Termination Fee or
the Parent Termination Fee, as applicable.
(g) Each No-Shop Party acknowledges and agrees that, during
the three Business Day period referred to in
Section 8.06(f)(iii), the other No-Shop Party shall have
the opportunity, but not the obligation, to propose to amend the
terms of this Agreement. Such No-Shop Partys Board of
Directors will review any proposal by the other No-Shop Party to
amend the terms of this Agreement in order to determine, in good
faith in the exercise of its fiduciary duties, whether such
proposal would result in the Acquisition Proposal not being a
Superior Proposal compared to this Agreement, including such
proposed amendments.
(h) Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent a No-Shop
Partys Board of Directors from complying with
Rule 14e-2(a)
under the 1934 Act with regard to an Acquisition Proposal.
(i) Each No-Shop Party acknowledges and agrees that each
successive modification of the material terms of any Acquisition
Proposal shall constitute a new Acquisition Proposal for
purposes of this Section 8.06.
(j) Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent a No-Shop
Partys Board of Directors from making a Change of
Recommendation in respect of any event, development,
circumstance or state of affairs occurring after the date hereof
but prior to the Company Shareholder Meeting or Parent
Stockholder Meeting, as the case may be, if such Board of
Directors, after consultation with outside legal counsel,
determines in good faith that the failure to take such action
would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties.
(k) When used in this Agreement, the following terms shall
have the following meanings:
Acquisition Proposal means, in respect of
either the Company or Parent, (i) any merger,
consolidation, share exchange, business combination,
amalgamation, consolidation, recapitalization, liquidation or
winding-up
in respect of such party; (ii) any sale or acquisition of
20% or more of the fair market value of the assets of such party
on a consolidated basis; (iii) any sale or acquisition of
20% or more of such partys shares of any class or rights
or interests therein or thereto; (iv) any sale of any
material interest in any material mineral properties;
(v) any similar business combination or transaction, of or
involving such party or any material Subsidiary, other than with
the other party; or (vi) any proposal or offer to, or
public announcement of an intention to do, any of the foregoing
from any Person other than the other party; provided that the
term Acquisition Proposal shall not include the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
Superior Proposal means an unsolicited bona
fide Acquisition Proposal made by a Third Party to the Company
or Parent in writing after the date hereof: (i) to purchase
or otherwise acquire, directly or indirectly, by means of a
merger, consolidation, share exchange, business combination,
amalgamation, consolidation, recapitalization, liquidation,
winding-up
or similar transaction, all of the Company Stock (in the case of
an Acquisition Proposal of which the Company is the subject) or
the Parent Stock (in the case of an Acquisition Proposal of
which Parent is the subject); (ii) that is reasonably
capable of being completed, taking into account all legal,
financial, regulatory (including antitrust and competition
approvals) and other aspects of such proposal and the Third
Party making such proposal; (iii) in respect of which any
required financing to complete such Acquisition Proposal has
been demonstrated to the satisfaction of the party that is the
subject of
A-41
such Acquisition Proposal, acting in good faith (after receipt
of advice from its financial advisors and outside legal
counsel), is reasonably likely to be obtained, (iv) that is
not subject to any due diligence condition; and (v) in
respect of which the Board of Directors of the party that is the
subject of such Acquisition Proposal determines in good faith
(after receipt of advice from its financial advisors with
respect to (y) below and outside legal counsel with respect
to (x) below) that (x) failure to recommend such
Acquisition Proposal to such partys stockholders would be
inconsistent with its fiduciary duties and (y) such
Acquisition Proposal taking into account all of the terms and
conditions thereof, if consummated in accordance with its terms
(but not assuming away any risk of non-completion), would result
in a transaction more favorable to such partys
stockholders from a financial point of view than the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement (including any
amendment of this Agreement proposed by the other party pursuant
to Section 8.06(g)), and taking into account the long-term
value and synergies anticipated to be realized as a result of
the combination of the Company and Parent.
Section 8.07. Public
Announcements. Parent and the Company shall
consult with each other before, directly or through any
representatives, issuing any press release, having any
communication with the press (whether or not for attribution),
making any other public statement or scheduling any press
conference or conference call with investors or analysts with
respect to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated
hereby and, except as may be required by Applicable Law or any
listing agreement with or rule of any national securities
exchange or association, shall not issue any such press release,
have any such communication, make any such other public
statement or schedule any such press conference or conference
call before such consultation. The initial press release of the
parties with respect to this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereby shall be a joint press release of the
Company and Parent in the form that is mutually agreed.
Section 8.08. Further
Assurances. At and after the Effective Time, the
officers and directors of the Surviving Corporation shall be
authorized to execute and deliver, in the name and on behalf of
the Company or Merger Subsidiary, any deeds, bills of sale,
assignments or assurances and to take and do, in the name and on
behalf of the Company or Merger Subsidiary, any other actions
and things to vest, perfect or confirm of record or otherwise in
the Surviving Corporation any and all right, title and interest
in, to and under any of the rights, properties or assets of the
Company acquired or to be acquired by the Surviving Corporation
as a result of, or in connection with, the Merger.
Section 8.09. Access
to Information. From the date hereof until the
Effective Time and subject to Applicable Law and the
Confidentiality Agreement, the Company and Parent shall and
shall cause each of its Subsidiaries to (i) give to the
other party, its counsel, financial advisors, auditors and other
authorized representatives reasonable access to the offices,
properties, books and records of such party (but in no event
shall such access include the right to perform physical
examinations and to take samples of the soil, ground water, air,
products or other areas as desired by such other party),
(ii) furnish to the other party, its counsel, financial
advisors, auditors and other authorized representatives such
financial and operating data and other information as such
Persons may reasonably request and (iii) instruct its
employees, counsel, financial advisors, auditors and other
authorized representatives to cooperate with the other party in
its investigation. Any investigation pursuant to this
Section 8.09 shall be conducted in such manner as not to
interfere unreasonably with the conduct of the business of the
other party. No information or knowledge obtained in any
investigation pursuant to this Section shall affect or be deemed
to modify any representation or warranty made by any party
hereunder.
Section 8.10. Notices
of Certain Events. Each of the Company and Parent
shall promptly notify the other of:
(a) any notice or other communication from any Person
alleging that the consent of such Person is or may be required
in connection with the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement;
(b) any notice or other communication from any Governmental
Authority in connection with the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement;
A-42
(c) any inaccuracy of any representation or warranty
contained in this Agreement at any time during the term hereof
that could reasonably be expected to cause any condition set
forth in Article 9 of this Agreement not to be
satisfied; and
(d) any failure of that party to comply with or satisfy any
covenant, condition or agreement to be complied with or
satisfied by it hereunder that would reasonably be expected to
cause any condition set forth in Article 9 of this
Agreement not to be satisfied;
provided that the delivery of any notice pursuant to this
Section 8.10 shall not limit or otherwise affect the
remedies available hereunder to the party receiving that notice.
Section 8.11. Affiliates. As
soon as reasonably practicable and in any event prior to the
Company Shareholder Meeting, the Company shall deliver to Parent
a letter identifying all known Persons who may be deemed
affiliates of the Company under Rule 145 of the
1933 Act. Thereafter, the Company shall use its reasonable
best efforts to obtain a written agreement from each Person who
may be so deemed as soon as practicable and, in any event, prior
to the Company Shareholder Meeting in a customary form to be
agreed upon by the parties for purposes of Rule 145 of the
1933 Act.
Section 8.12. Section 16
Matters. Prior to the Effective Time, each party
shall take all such steps as may be required to cause any
dispositions of Company Stock (including derivative securities
with respect to Company Stock) or acquisitions of Parent Stock
(including derivative securities with respect to Parent Stock)
resulting from the transactions contemplated by Article 2
of this Agreement by each individual who is subject to the
reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the
1934 Act with respect to the Company and will become
subject to such reporting requirements with respect to Parent,
to be exempt under
Rule 16b-3
promulgated under the 1934 Act.
Section 8.13. Control
of Operations. Notwithstanding anything in this
Agreement that may be deemed to the contrary, nothing in this
Agreement shall, directly or indirectly, give any party control
over any other partys operations, business or
decision-making before the Effective Time, and control over all
such matters shall remain in the hands of the relevant party,
subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
ARTICLE 9
Conditions
to the Merger
Section 9.01. Conditions
to the Obligations of Each Party. The obligations
of the Company, Parent and Merger Subsidiary to consummate the
Merger are subject to the satisfaction of the following
conditions:
(a) (i) the Company Shareholder Approval shall have
been obtained in accordance with New York Law and (ii) the
Parent Stockholder Approval shall have been obtained in
accordance with Delaware Law and the applicable New York Stock
Exchange rules and regulations;
(b) no Applicable Law shall prohibit the consummation of
the Merger;
(c) (i) any applicable waiting period under the HSR
Act relating to the Merger shall have expired or been
terminated, and (ii) the European Commission shall have
taken a decision (or have been deemed to have taken a decision)
under Article 6(1)(a) of the EC Merger Regulation or under
6(1)(b) of the EC Merger Regulation declaring the Merger
compatible with the common market;
(d) the Registration Statement shall have been declared
effective and no stop order suspending the effectiveness of the
Registration Statement shall be in effect and no proceedings for
such purpose shall be pending before or threatened by the SEC;
(e) the shares of Parent Stock to be issued in the Parent
Stock Issuance shall have been approved for listing on the New
York Stock Exchange, subject to official notice of
issuance; and
(f) all actions by or in respect of, or filings with, any
Governmental Authority, required to permit the consummation of
the Merger shall have been taken, made or obtained, except for
such actions or
A-43
filings the failure of which to take, make or obtain would not
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with
respect to Parent following the Effective Time.
Section 9.02. Conditions
to the Obligations of Parent and Merger
Subsidiary. The obligations of Parent and Merger
Subsidiary to consummate the Merger are subject to the
satisfaction of the following further conditions:
(a) (i) the Company shall have performed in all
material respects all of its obligations hereunder required to
be performed by it at or prior to the Effective Time,
(ii) the representations and warranties of the Company
contained in this Agreement and in any certificate or other
writing delivered by the Company pursuant hereto (disregarding
all materiality and Material Adverse Effect qualifications
contained therein) shall be true and correct at and as of the
Effective Time (other than representations and warranties that
by their terms address matters only as of another specified
time, which shall be true and correct only as of such time),
with only such exceptions as, individually or in the aggregate,
have not had and would not reasonably be expected to have a
Material Adverse Effect with respect to the Company and
(iii) Parent shall have received a certificate signed by an
executive officer of the Company to the foregoing
effect; and
(b) there shall not have occurred and be continuing as of
the Effective Time any event, occurrence, revelation or
development of a state of circumstances or facts which,
individually or in the aggregate, has had or would reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to the
Company.
Section 9.03. Conditions
to the Obligations of the Company. The
obligations of the Company to consummate the Merger are subject
to the satisfaction of the following further conditions:
(a) (i) each of Parent and Merger Subsidiary shall
have performed in all material respects all of its obligations
hereunder required to be performed by it at or prior to the
Effective Time, (ii) the representations and warranties of
Parent contained in this Agreement and in any certificate or
other writing delivered by Parent pursuant hereto (disregarding
all materiality and Material Adverse Effect qualifications
contained therein) shall be true and correct at and as of the
Effective Time (other than representations and warranties that
by their terms address matters only as of another specified
time, which shall be true and correct only as of such time),
with only such exceptions as, individually or in the aggregate,
have not had and would not reasonably be expected to have a
Material Adverse Effect with respect to Parent and
(iii) the Company shall have received a certificate signed
by an executive officer of Parent to the foregoing effect;
(b) there shall not have occurred and be continuing as of
or otherwise arisen before the Effective Time any event,
occurrence, revelation or development of a state of
circumstances or facts which, individually or in the aggregate,
has had or would reasonably be expected to have a Material
Adverse Effect with respect to Parent; and
(c) the three Company directors designated in accordance
with Section 7.07(b) shall have been elected to serve on
Parents Board of Directors effective as of the Effective
Time.
ARTICLE 10
Termination
Section 10.01. Termination. This
Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at
any time prior to the Effective Time (notwithstanding any
approval of this Agreement by the shareholders of the Company):
(a) by mutual written agreement of the Company and Parent;
(b) by either the Company or Parent, if:
(i) the Merger has not been consummated on or before
August 31, 2007 (the End Date); provided
that the right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this
Section 10.01(b)(i) shall not be
A-44
available to any party whose breach of any provision of this
Agreement results in the failure of the Merger to be consummated
by such time;
(ii) there shall be any Applicable Law that (A) makes
consummation of the Merger illegal or otherwise prohibited or
(B) enjoins the Company or Parent from consummating the
Merger and such injunction shall have become final and
nonappealable; or
(iii) (A) at the Parent Stockholder Meeting (including
any adjournment or postponement thereof), the Parent Stockholder
Approval shall not have been obtained, or (B) at the
Company Shareholder Meeting (including any adjournment or
postponement thereof), the Company Shareholder Approval shall
not have been obtained; or
(c) by Parent, if:
(i) the Board of Directors of the Company shall have
effected a Change in Recommendation;
(ii) a breach of any representation or warranty or failure
to perform any covenant or agreement on the part of the Company
set forth in this Agreement shall have occurred that would cause
the condition set forth in Section 9.02(a) not to be
satisfied, and such condition is incapable of being satisfied by
the End Date;
(iii) the Company shall have willfully and materially
breached its obligations under Section 8.04 or 8.06; or
(iv) Parent proposes to enter into a definitive agreement
with respect to a Superior Proposal in compliance with the
provisions of Section 8.06(f), provided that Parent has
previously or concurrently will have paid to the Company the
Parent Termination Fee; or
(d) by the Company, if:
(i) the Board of Directors of Parent shall have effected a
Change in Recommendation;
(ii) a breach of any representation or warranty or failure
to perform any covenant or agreement on the part of Parent or
Merger Subsidiary set forth in this Agreement shall have
occurred that would cause the condition set forth in
Section 9.03(a) not to be satisfied, and such condition is
incapable of being satisfied by the End Date; or
(iii) Parent shall have willfully and materially breached
its obligations under Section 8.05 or 8.06; or
(iv) if the Company proposes to enter into a definitive
agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal in compliance with
the provisions of Section 8.06(f), provided that the
Company has previously or concurrently will have paid to Parent
the Company Termination Fee.
The party desiring to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this
Section 10.01 (other than pursuant to
Section 10.01(a)) shall give notice of such termination to
the other party.
Section 10.02. Effect
of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated
pursuant to Section 10.01, this Agreement shall become void
and of no effect without liability of any party (or any
stockholder or shareholder, as the case may be, director,
officer, employee, agent, consultant or representative of such
party) to the other party hereto; provided that, if such
termination shall result from the willful (i) failure of
either party to fulfill a condition to the performance of the
obligations of the other party or (ii) failure of either
party to perform a covenant hereof, such party shall be fully
liable for any and all liabilities and damages incurred or
suffered by the other party as a result of such failure. The
provisions of this Section 10.02 and Sections 11.04,
11.08, 11.09 and 11.10 shall survive any termination hereof
pursuant to Section 10.01.
A-45
ARTICLE 11
Miscellaneous
Section 11.01. Notices. All
notices, requests and other communications to any party
hereunder shall be in writing (including facsimile transmission)
and shall be given,
if to Parent or Merger Subsidiary, to:
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc.
1615 Poydras Street
New Orleans, Louisiana 70112
Attention: Dean T. Falgoust, Esq.
Facsimile No.:
504-582-1833
with a copy to:
|
|
|
Davis Polk & Wardwell
450 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10017
|
Attention:
|
|
Paul R. Kingsley
Marc O. Williams
Facsimile No.:
(212) 450-3800
|
and to:
|
|
|
Jones, Walker, Waechter,
Poitevent, Carrère & Denègre, L.L.P.
201 St. Charles Avenue
New Orleans, Louisiana 70170
|
Attention:
|
|
L. Richards McMillan, II
Douglas N. Currault, II
Facsimile No.:
(504) 582-8583
|
if to the Company, to:
|
Phelps Dodge Corporation
One North Central Avenue
Phoenix, Arizona 85004
|
Attention:
|
|
S. David Colton, Esq.
Facsimile No.:
(602) 366-7321
|
with a copy to:
|
Debevoise & Plimpton
LLP
919 Third Avenue
New York, New York 10022
|
Attention:
|
|
Michael W. Blair
Gregory V. Gooding
Facsimile No.:
(212) 909-6836
|
or to such other address or facsimile number as such party may
hereafter specify for the purpose by notice to the other parties
hereto. All such notices, requests and other communications
shall be deemed received on the date of receipt by the recipient
thereof if received prior to 5:00 p.m. on a business day in
the place of receipt. Otherwise, any such notice, request or
communication shall be deemed to have been received on the next
succeeding business day in the place of receipt.
Section 11.02. Survival
of Representations and Warranties. The
representations, warranties and agreements contained herein and
in any certificate or other writing delivered pursuant hereto
shall not survive the Effective Time, except for the agreements
set forth in Section 7.04 and 7.06.
Section 11.03. Amendments
and Waivers. (a) Any provision of this
Agreement may be amended or waived prior to the Effective Time
if, but only if, such amendment or waiver is in writing and is
signed, in the
A-46
case of an amendment, by each party to this Agreement or, in the
case of a waiver, by each party against whom the waiver is to be
effective; provided that, after the Company Shareholder
Approval, without the further approval of the Companys
shareholders, no such amendment or waiver shall be effective
unless permitted by New York Law.
(b) No failure or delay by any party in exercising any
right, power or privilege hereunder shall operate as a waiver
thereof nor shall any single or partial exercise thereof
preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise
of any other right, power or privilege. The rights and remedies
herein provided shall be cumulative and not exclusive of any
rights or remedies provided by Applicable Law.
Section 11.04. Fees
And Expenses. (a)
General. Except as otherwise provided herein,
all costs and expenses incurred in connection with this
Agreement shall be paid by the party incurring such cost or
expense.
(b) Company Payments.
(i) The Company shall pay to Parent in immediately
available funds, within one Business Day after demand by Parent,
the Company Termination Fee if (A) this Agreement is
terminated by Parent pursuant to 10.01(c)(iii) or (B) this
Agreement is terminated by Parent pursuant to
Section 10.01(c)(i), unless after the date hereof and prior
to the Company Shareholder Meeting (x) a Material Adverse
Effect has occurred with respect to Parent, and (y) the
Companys Board of Directors subsequently makes a Change of
Recommendation after determining in good faith (after receipt of
advice from its legal and financial advisors) that the failure
to make a Change of Recommendation would be inconsistent with
its fiduciary duties.
(ii) The Company shall pay to Parent in immediately
available funds, within one Business Day after demand by Parent,
an amount equal to one-half of the Company Termination Fee if
this Agreement is terminated by the Company or Parent pursuant
to Section 10.01(b)(iii)(B), unless after the date hereof
and prior to the Company Shareholder Meeting (x) a Material
Adverse Effect has occurred with respect to Parent and
(y) the Companys Board of Directors subsequently
makes a Change of Recommendation after determining in good faith
(after receipt of advice from its legal and financial advisors)
that the failure to make a Change of Recommendation would be
inconsistent with its fiduciary duties.
(iii) The Company shall pay Parent in immediately available
funds, within one Business Day after demand by Parent, the
Company Termination Fee (or, if one-half of the Company
Termination Fee was already paid or payable pursuant to
Section 11.04(b)(ii), the remaining portion of the Company
Termination Fee) if
(A) this Agreement is terminated by the Company or Parent
pursuant to (x) Section 10.01(b)(i) or
(y) Section 10.01(b)(iii)(B) (except in the event that
one-half of the Company Termination Fee was not payable pursuant
to the terms of Section 11.04(b)(ii));
(B) following the date hereof and prior to the End Date (in
the case of a termination pursuant to Section 10.01(b)(i))
or the Company Shareholder Meeting (in the case of a termination
pursuant to Section 10.01(b)(iii)(B)), an Acquisition
Proposal shall have been made with respect to the Company or
shall otherwise have become publicly known or any Person shall
have publicly announced an intention (whether or not conditional
and whether or not withdrawn) to make an Acquisition Proposal
with respect to the Company; and
(C) within 12 months following the date of such
termination: (1) the Company merges with or into, or is
acquired, directly or indirectly, by merger or otherwise by, a
Third Party; (2) a Third Party, directly or indirectly,
acquires more than 50% of the total assets of the Company and
its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole; (3) a Third Party,
directly or indirectly, acquires more than 50% of the
outstanding shares of Company Stock; or (4) the Company
adopts or implements a plan of liquidation, recapitalization or
share repurchase relating to more than 50% of the outstanding
shares of Company Stock or an extraordinary dividend relating to
more than 50% of such outstanding shares or 50% of the assets of
the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole (or in any of
A-47
clauses (1) through (4) the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries shall have entered into any contract or agreement
providing for such action).
(iv) The Company shall pay Parent in immediately available
funds, within one Business Day after demand by Parent, the
Expenses of Parent if this Agreement is terminated by Parent
pursuant to Section 10.01(c)(ii).
(v) The Company shall pay to Parent in immediately
available funds the Company Termination Fee immediately prior to
the termination of this Agreement by the Company pursuant to
Section 10.01(d)(iv).
(vi) The Company acknowledges that the agreements contained
in this Section 11.04(b) are an integral part of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and that if the
Company fails to pay in a timely manner the amounts due pursuant
to this Section 11.04(b) and, in order to obtain such
payment, Parent makes a claim that results in a judgment against
the Company for the amounts set forth in this
Section 11.04(b), the Company shall pay to Parent its
reasonable costs and expenses (including reasonable
attorneys fees and expenses) in connection with such suit,
together with interest on the amounts set forth in this
Section 11.04(b) at the prime rate of Citibank N.A. in
effect on the date such payment was required to be made. Payment
of the fees described in this Section 11.04(b) shall not be
in lieu of damages incurred in the event of intentional or
willful breach of this Agreement.
(c) Parent Payments.
(i) Parent shall pay to the Company in immediately
available funds, within one Business Day after demand by the
Company, the Parent Termination Fee if (A) this Agreement
is terminated by the Company pursuant to 10.01(d)(iii), or
(B) this Agreement is terminated by the Company pursuant to
Section 10.01(d)(i), unless after the date hereof and prior
to the Parent Stockholder Meeting (x) a Material Adverse
Effect has occurred with respect to the Company, and
(y) Parents Board of Directors subsequently makes a
Change of Recommendation after determining in good faith (after
receipt of advice from its legal and financial advisors) that
the failure to make a Change of Recommendation would be
inconsistent with its fiduciary duties.
(ii) Parent shall pay to the Company in immediately
available funds, within one Business Day after demand by Parent,
an amount equal to one-half of the Parent Termination Fee if
this Agreement is terminated by the Company or Parent pursuant
to Section 10.01(b)(iii)(A), unless prior to the Parent
Stockholder Meeting and after the date hereof (x) a
Material Adverse Effect has occurred with respect to the Company
and (y) Parents Board of Directors subsequently makes
a Change of Recommendation after determining in good faith
(after receipt of advice from its legal and financial advisors)
that the failure to make a Change of Recommendation would be
inconsistent with its fiduciary duties.
(iii) Parent shall pay the Company in immediately available
funds, within one Business Day after demand by the Company, the
Parent Termination Fee (or, if one-half of the Parent
Termination Fee was already paid or payable pursuant to
Section 11.04(c)(ii), the remaining amount of the Parent
Termination Fee) if
(A) this Agreement is terminated by the Company or Parent
pursuant to (x) Section 10.01(b)(i) or
(y) Section 10.01(b)(iii)(A) (except in the event that
one-half of the Parent Termination Fee was not payable pursuant
to the terms of Section 11.04(c)(ii));
(B) following the date hereof and prior to the End Date (in
the case of a termination pursuant to Section 10.01(b)(i))
or the Parent Stockholder Meeting (in the case of a termination
pursuant to Section 10.01(b)(iii)(A)), an Acquisition
Proposal shall have been made with respect to Parent or shall
otherwise have become publicly known or any Person shall have
publicly announced an intention (whether or not conditional and
whether or not withdrawn) to make an Acquisition Proposal with
respect to Parent; and
(C) within 12 months following the date of such
termination: (1) Parent merges with or into, or is
acquired, directly or indirectly, by merger or otherwise by, a
Third Party; (2) a Third Party, directly or indirectly,
acquires more than 50% of the total assets of Parent and its
Subsidiaries, taken
A-48
as a whole; (3) a Third Party, directly or indirectly,
acquires more than 50% of the outstanding shares of Parent
Stock; or (4) Parent adopts or implements a plan of
liquidation, recapitalization or share repurchase relating to
more than 50% of the outstanding shares of Parent Stock or an
extraordinary dividend relating to more than 50% of such
outstanding shares or 50% of the assets of Parent and its
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole (or in any of clauses (1)
through (4) Parent or any of its Subsidiaries shall have
entered into any contract or agreement providing for such
action).
(iv) Parent shall pay the Company in immediately available
funds, within one Business Day after demand by the Company, the
Expenses of the Company if this Agreement is terminated by the
Company pursuant to Section 10.01(d)(ii).
(v) Parent shall pay to the Company in immediately
available funds the Parent Termination Fee immediately prior to
the termination of this Agreement by Parent pursuant to
Section 10.01(c)(iv).
(vi) Parent acknowledges that the agreements contained in
this Section 11.04(c) are an integral part of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and that if Parent
fails to pay in a timely manner the amounts due pursuant to this
Section 11.04(c) and, in order to obtain such payment, the
Company makes a claim that results in a judgment against Parent
for the amounts set forth in this Section 11.04(c), Parent
shall pay to the Company its reasonable costs and expenses
(including reasonable attorneys fees and expenses) in
connection with such suit, together with interest on the amounts
set forth in this Section 11.04(c) at the prime rate of
Citibank N.A. in effect on the date such payment was required to
be made. Payment of the fees described in this
Section 11.04(c) shall not be in lieu of damages incurred
in the event of intentional or willful breach of this Agreement.
(d) Defined Terms. For purposes of
Sections 11.04(b) and (c), the following terms shall have
the following meanings:
Company Termination Fee means an amount equal
to $750,000,000.
Expenses means all
out-of-pocket
fees and expenses (including all fees and expenses of counsel,
accountants, financial advisors and investment bankers to a
party hereto and its Affiliates), up to $40,000,000 in the
aggregate, incurred by a party or on its behalf in connection
with or related to the authorization, preparation, negotiation,
execution and performance of this Agreement, the preparation,
printing, filing and mailing of the Joint Proxy Statement, the
filing of any required notices under antitrust Applicable Laws
or in connection with other regulatory approvals, and all other
matters related to the transactions contemplated hereby
(including the arrangement of, obtaining the commitment to
provide or obtaining any financing for the transactions
contemplated hereby).
Parent Termination Fee means an amount equal
to $375,000,000.
Section 11.05. Disclosure
Letters. Notwithstanding anything in this
Agreement that may be deemed to the contrary,
(a) any reference in a particular Section of either the
Company Disclosure Letter or the Parent Disclosure Letter shall
only be deemed to be an exception to (or, as applicable, a
disclosure for purposes of) (i) the representations and
warranties (or covenants, as applicable) of the relevant party
that are contained in the corresponding Section of this
Agreement and (ii) any other representations and warranties
of such party that are contained in this Agreement, but only in
each case if the relevance of that reference as an exception to
(or a disclosure for purposes of) such representations and
warranties would be readily apparent on its face to a reasonable
person who has read that reference and such representations and
warranties, without any independent knowledge on the part of the
reader regarding the matter(s) so disclosed. The mere inclusion
of an item in either the Company Disclosure Letter or the Parent
Disclosure Letter as an exception to a representation or
warranty shall not be deemed an admission that such item
represents a material exception or material fact, event or
circumstance or that such item has had or would be reasonably
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to the
Company or Parent, as applicable; and
(b) any information contained in any part of any Company
SEC Document or of any Parent SEC Document shall only be deemed
to be an exception to (or, as applicable, a disclosure for
purposes of) the
A-49
representations and warranties of the relevant party if the
relevance of that information as an exception to (or a
disclosure for purposes of) such representations and warranties
would be readily apparent on its face to a reasonable person who
has read that information and such representations and
warranties, without any independent knowledge on the part of the
reader regarding the matter(s) so disclosed, provided that in no
event shall any information contained in any part of any Company
SEC Document or of any Parent SEC Document entitled
Risk Factors or Forward-Looking
Statements be deemed to be an exception to (or, as
applicable, a disclosure for purposes of) any representation(s)
and warranty(ies) of the Company or Parent that is contained in
this Agreement.
Section 11.06. Binding
Effect; Benefit; Assignment. (a) The
provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and, except
as provided in Section 7.04, shall inure to the benefit of
the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.
No provision of this Agreement is intended to confer any rights,
benefits, remedies, obligations or liabilities hereunder upon
any Person other than the parties hereto and their respective
successors and assigns, except (i) as provided in
Section 7.04 and (ii) the right of the Companys
shareholders to receive shares of Parent Stock and cash as a
result of the Merger and to recover, solely through an action
brought by the Company, damages from Parent in the event of a
willful or intentional breach of this Agreement by Parent, in
which event the damages recoverable by the Company for itself
and on behalf of its shareholders (without duplication) shall be
determined by reference to the total amount that would have been
recoverable by the holders of the Company Stock if all such
holders brought an action against Parent and were recognized as
intended third party beneficiaries hereunder.
(b) No party may assign, delegate or otherwise transfer any
of its rights or obligations under this Agreement without the
consent of each other party hereto. Any attempted assignment in
violation hereof shall be null and void.
Section 11.07. Specific
Performance. The parties hereto agree that
irreparable damage would occur in the event that any of the
provisions of this Agreement were not performed in accordance
with their specific terms or were otherwise breached. It is
accordingly agreed that the parties shall be entitled to seek an
injunction or injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement
and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions hereof in
any court of the United States or any state having jurisdiction,
this being in addition to any other remedy to which they are
entitled at law or in equity.
Section 11.08. Governing
Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York,
without regard to the conflicts of law rules of such state.
Section 11.09. Jurisdiction. The
parties hereto agree that any suit, action or proceeding seeking
to enforce any provision of, or based on any matter arising out
of or in connection with, this Agreement or the transactions
contemplated hereby shall be brought in any federal court
located in the Southern District of New York or any state court
located in the Borough of Manhattan in New York City, and each
of the parties hereby irrevocably consents to the jurisdiction
of such courts (and of the appropriate appellate courts
therefrom) in any such suit, action or proceeding and
irrevocably waives, to the fullest extent permitted by law, any
objection that it may now or hereafter have to the laying of the
venue of any such suit, action or proceeding in any such court
or that any such suit, action or proceeding brought in any such
court has been brought in an inconvenient forum. Process in any
such suit, action or proceeding may be served on any party
anywhere in the world, whether within or without the
jurisdiction of any such court. Without limiting the foregoing,
each party agrees that service of process on such party as
provided in Section 11.01 shall be deemed effective service
of process on such party.
Section 11.10. WAIVER
OF JURY TRIAL. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY
IRREVOCABLY WAIVES ANY AND ALL RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY
LEGAL PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR
THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY.
Section 11.11. No
Personal Liability. No director or officer of the
Company shall have any personal liability whatsoever to Parent
under this Agreement, or any other document delivered in
connection with the Merger on behalf of the Company. No director
or officer of Parent shall have any personal liability
whatsoever
A-50
to the Company under this Agreement, or any other document
delivered in connection with the Merger on behalf of Parent.
Section 11.12. Counterparts;
Effectiveness. This Agreement may be signed in
any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original,
with the same effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto
were upon the same instrument. This Agreement shall become
effective when each party hereto shall have received a
counterpart hereof signed by all of the other parties hereto.
Until and unless each party has received a counterpart hereof
signed by the other party hereto, this Agreement shall have no
effect and no party shall have any right or obligation hereunder
(whether by virtue of any other oral or written agreement or
other communication).
Section 11.13. Entire
Agreement. This Agreement and the Confidentiality
Agreement constitute the entire agreement between the parties
with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof and
supersede all prior agreements and understandings, both oral and
written, between the parties with respect to the subject matter
hereof and thereof.
Section 11.14. Severability. If
any term, provision, covenant or restriction of this Agreement
is held by a court of competent jurisdiction or other
Governmental Authority to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the
remainder of the terms, provisions, covenants and restrictions
of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and
shall in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated so long as
the economic or legal substance of the transactions contemplated
hereby is not affected in any manner materially adverse to any
party. Upon such a determination, the parties shall negotiate in
good faith to modify this Agreement so as to effect the original
intent of the parties as closely as possible in an acceptable
manner in order that the transactions contemplated hereby be
consummated as originally contemplated to the fullest extent
possible.
[The remainder of this page has been intentionally left
blank; the next page is the signature page.]
A-51
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be duly executed by their respective authorized
officers as of the day and year first above written.
PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION
Name: Ramiro G. Peru
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Executive Vice President and Chief
|
Financial Officer
FREEPORT-MCMORAN COPPER & GOLD INC.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Richard
C. Adkerson
|
Name: Richard C. Adkerson
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
PANTHER ACQUISITION CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Richard
C. Adkerson
|
Name: Richard C. Adkerson
A-52
APPENDIX B
OPINION
OF J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES INC.
November 18,
2006
The Board of Directors
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc.
1615 Poydras Street
New Orleans, LA 70112
Members of the Board of Directors:
You have requested our opinion as to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to Freeport-McMoRan Copper &
Gold Inc. (the Company) of the consideration to be
paid by the Company in the proposed merger (the
Merger) of a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company
with Phelps Dodge Corp. (the Merger Partner).
Pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, to be dated as of
November 18, 2006 (the Agreement), among the
Company, Panther Acquisition Corporation and the Merger Partner,
the Merger Partner will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company, and each outstanding share of common stock, par value
$6.25 per share, of the Merger Partner (the Merger
Partner Common Stock), other than shares of Merger Partner
Common Stock held in treasury or owned by the Company, will be
converted into the right to receive $88.00 per share in
cash (the Cash Consideration) and 0.67 shares
(the Stock Consideration, and together with the Cash
Consideration, the Consideration) of the
Companys Class B common stock, par value
$0.10 per share (the Company Common Stock).
In arriving at our opinion, we have, among other things
(i) reviewed a draft dated November 17, 2006 of the
Agreement; (ii) reviewed certain publicly available
business and financial information concerning the Merger Partner
and the Company and the industries in which they operate that we
deemed to be relevant; (iii) compared the proposed
financial terms of the Merger with the publicly available
financial terms of certain other transactions involving
companies we deemed to be relevant; (iv) reviewed the
financial and operating performance of the Merger Partner and
the Company and compared them with those of certain publicly
traded companies that we deemed to be relevant;
(v) reviewed the current and historical market prices and
valuation multiples of the Merger Partner Common Stock and the
Company Common Stock and compared them with those of certain
publicly traded companies that we deemed to be relevant;
(vi) reviewed certain information, including financial
analyses and forecasts prepared by the managements of the Merger
Partner and the Company relating to their respective businesses;
(vii) participated in certain discussions and negotiations
among representatives of the Merger Partner and the Company and
their financial and legal advisors; (viii) reviewed the
potential pro forma impact of the Merger; and
(ix) performed such other financial studies and analyses
and took into account such other information and matters as we
deemed appropriate.
In addition, we have conducted discussions with certain members
of the management and representatives of the Merger Partner and
the Company with respect to certain aspects of the Merger, and
the past and current business operations of the Merger Partner
and the Company, the financial condition and future prospects
and operations of the Merger Partner and the Company, the
effects of the Merger on the financial condition and future
prospects of the Merger Partner and the Company, including
concerning the matters described in clauses (ii) and
(vi) above, and certain other matters we believed necessary
or appropriate to our inquiry.
In giving our opinion, we have relied upon and assumed, without
assuming responsibility or liability for independent
verification, the accuracy and completeness of all information
that was publicly available or was furnished to or discussed
with us or otherwise reviewed by or for us. We have not
conducted any valuation or appraisal of any assets or
liabilities of the Merger Partner or the Company, nor have we
evaluated the solvency or fair value of the Merger Partner or
the Company under any state or federal laws relating to
bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters. In addition, we have
not assumed any obligation to conduct any physical
B-1
inspection of the properties or facilities of the Merger Partner
or the Company. In relying on the financial analyses and
forecasts provided to or discussed with us by the Merger Partner
or the Company, we have assumed that they have been reasonably
prepared and reflect the best currently available estimates and
judgment of the Merger Partners or the Companys
management as to the expected future results of operations and
financial condition of the Merger Partner or the Company, as the
case may be. We express no view as to such analyses or forecasts
or the assumptions on which they were based. We have also
assumed that the Merger will have the tax consequences described
in discussions with, and materials furnished to us by,
representatives of the Company, that, in all respects material
to our analysis, the other transactions contemplated by the
Agreement will be consummated as described in the Agreement, and
that the final form of the Agreement will be substantially
similar to the last draft reviewed by us. We have also assumed
that the representations and warranties made by the Company and
the Merger Partner in the Agreement are and will be true and
correct in all respects material to our analysis. We are not
legal, regulatory or tax experts and have relied on the
assessments made by advisors to the Company with respect to such
issues. We have further assumed that all governmental,
regulatory or other consents and approvals (contractual or
otherwise) necessary for the consummation of the Merger will be
obtained without any material adverse effect on the Merger
Partner or the Company or on the contemplated benefits of the
Merger.
Our opinion is necessarily based on economic, market and other
conditions as they exist and can be evaluated on, and the
information made available to us as of, the date hereof. It
should be understood that subsequent developments may affect
this opinion and that we do not have any obligation to update,
revise, or reaffirm this opinion. Our opinion is limited to the
fairness, from a financial point of view, to the Company of the
Consideration to be paid in the proposed Merger and we express
no opinion as to the fairness of the Merger (or the
Consideration) to, or any consideration of, the holders of any
class of securities, creditors or other constituencies of the
Company or as to the underlying decision by the Company to
engage in the Merger. We are expressing no opinion herein as to
the price at which the Company Common Stock or the Merger
Partner Common Stock will trade at any future time.
We have acted as financial advisor to the Company with respect
to the proposed Merger and will receive a fee from the Company
for our services, a substantial portion of which will become
payable only if the proposed Merger is consummated. In addition,
the Company has agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities
arising out of our engagement. We and our affiliates have
performed in the past, and may continue to perform, certain
financial advisory and other investment banking and commercial
banking services for the Company, the Merger Partner and their
respective affiliates, all for customary compensation. Such past
services have included acting as bookrunning arranger and agent
bank for the Companys revolving credit facility in August
2006, acting as bookrunning lead managing underwriter for the
Companys public offerings of its debt securities in 2003
and 2004, acting as dealer manager on the Merger Partners
tender offer for outstanding debt securities in 2005, and acting
as bookrunning lead managing underwriter for the Merger
Partners offering of its equity and equity-linked
securities in 2002. In addition, certain of our affiliates are
lenders to, and parties to derivatives and hedging transactions
with, the Company, the Merger Partner and their respective
affiliates. In addition, we expect that we and our affiliates
will arrange
and/or
provide financing to the Company specifically in connection with
the proposed Merger for additional compensation. In the ordinary
course of our businesses, we and our affiliates may actively
trade the debt and equity securities of the Company or the
Merger Partner for our own account or for the accounts of
customers and, accordingly, we may at any time hold long or
short positions in such securities.
On the basis of and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion
as of the date hereof that the Consideration to be paid by the
Company pursuant to the proposed Merger is fair, from a
financial point of view, to the Company.
B-2
This letter is provided to the Board of Directors of the Company
in connection with and for the purposes of its evaluation of the
Merger. This opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any
shareholder of the Company as to how such shareholder should
vote with respect to the Merger or any other matter. This
opinion may not be disclosed, referred to, or communicated (in
whole or in part) to any third party for any purpose whatsoever
except with our prior written approval. This opinion may be
reproduced in full in any prospectus or proxy or information
statement mailed to shareholders of the Merger Partner or the
Company but may not otherwise be disclosed publicly in any
manner without our prior written approval.
Very truly yours,
J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES INC.
B-3
APPENDIX C
OPINION
OF MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH
INCORPORATED
|
|
|
|
|
Global Markets &
Investment Banking Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 World Financial Center
North Tower 30th Floor
New York, New York 10080
212 449 1000
|
November 18,
2006
Board of Directors
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc.
1615 Poydras Street
New Orleans, LA 70112
Members of the Board of Directors:
Phelps Dodge Corporation (the Company),
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. (the
Acquiror) and Panther Acquisition Corporation, a
newly formed, wholly owned subsidiary of the Acquiror (the
Acquisition Sub), propose to enter into an Agreement
and Plan of Merger to be dated as of November 18, 2006 (the
Agreement) pursuant to which the Company will be
merged with the Acquisition Sub in a transaction (the
Merger) in which each outstanding share of the
Companys common stock, par value $6.25 per share (the
Company Shares), other than Company Shares held in
treasury or owned by the Acquiror, will be converted into the
right to receive $88.00 per share in cash (the Cash
Consideration) and 0.67 shares (the Stock
Consideration, and together with the Cash Consideration,
the Consideration) of the Class B common stock
of the Acquiror, par value $0.10 per share (the
Acquiror Shares).
You have asked us whether, in our opinion, the Consideration to
be paid by the Acquiror pursuant to the proposed Merger is fair,
from a financial point of view, to the Acquiror.
In arriving at the opinion set forth below, we have, among other
things:
(1) Reviewed certain publicly available business and
financial information concerning the Company and the Acquiror
and the industries in which they operate that we deemed to be
relevant;
(2) Reviewed certain information, including financial
analyses and forecasts prepared by the managements of the
Company and the Acquiror, relating to their respective
businesses;
(3) Conducted discussions with certain members of the
management and representatives of the Company and the Acquiror
with respect to certain aspects of the Merger, and the past and
current business operations of the Company and the Acquiror, the
financial condition and future prospects and operations of the
Company and the Acquiror, the effects of the Merger on the
financial condition and future prospects of the Company and the
Acquiror, including concerning the matters described in
clauses 1 and 2 above, and certain other matters we
believed necessary or appropriate to our inquiry;
(4) Reviewed the current and historical market prices and
valuation multiples for the Company Shares and the Acquiror
Shares and compared them with those of certain publicly traded
companies that we deemed to be relevant;
C-1
(5) Reviewed the financial and operating performance of the
Company and the Acquiror and compared them with those of certain
publicly traded companies that we deemed to be relevant;
(6) Compared the proposed financial terms of the Merger
with the publicly available financial terms of certain other
transactions involving companies we deemed to be relevant;
(7) Participated in certain discussions and negotiations
among representatives of the Company and the Acquiror and their
financial and legal advisors;
(8) Reviewed the potential pro forma impact of the Merger;
(9) Reviewed a draft dated November 17, 2006 of the
Agreement; and
(10) Performed such other financial studies and analyses
and took into account such other information and matters as we
deemed appropriate.
In preparing our opinion, we have assumed and relied on the
accuracy and completeness of all information supplied or
otherwise made available to us, discussed with or reviewed by or
for us, or publicly available, and we have not assumed any
responsibility or liability for independently verifying such
information or undertaken an evaluation or appraisal of any of
the assets or liabilities of the Company or the Acquiror, nor
have we evaluated the solvency or fair value of the Company or
the Acquiror under any state or federal laws relating to
bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters. In addition, we have
not assumed any obligation to conduct any physical inspection of
the properties or facilities of the Company or the Acquiror. In
relying on the financial analyses or forecasts furnished to or
discussed with us by the Company or the Acquiror, we have
assumed that they have been reasonably prepared and reflect the
best currently available estimates and judgment of the
Companys or the Acquirors management as to the
expected future results of operations and financial condition of
the Company or the Acquiror, as the case may be. We express no
view as to such analyses or forecasts or the assumptions on
which they were based. We have also assumed that the Merger will
have the tax consequences described in discussions with, and all
materials provided to us by, representatives of the Acquiror,
that, in all respects material to our analysis, the other
transactions contemplated by the Agreement will be consummated
as described in the Agreement and that the final form of the
Agreement will be substantially similar to the last draft
reviewed by us. We have also assumed that the representations
and warranties made by the Company and the Acquiror in the
Agreement are and will be true and correct in all ways material
to our analysis. We are not legal, regulatory or tax experts and
have relied on the assessments made by advisors to the Acquiror
with respect to such issues.
Our opinion is necessarily based upon market, economic and other
conditions as they exist and can be evaluated on, and on the
information made available to us as of, the date hereof. It
should be understood that subsequent developments may affect
this opinion and that we do not have any obligation to update,
revise, or reaffirm this opinion. We have further assumed that
all governmental, regulatory or other consents or approvals
(contractual or otherwise) necessary for the consummation of the
Merger will be obtained without any material adverse effect on
the Company or the Acquiror or the contemplated benefits of the
Merger.
We are acting as financial advisor to the Acquiror in connection
with the Merger and will receive a fee from the Acquiror for our
services, a significant portion of which is contingent upon the
consummation of the Merger. In addition, the Acquiror has agreed
to indemnify us for certain liabilities arising out of our
engagement. We are providing financing to the Acquiror in
connection with the Merger and will receive compensation for
doing so. We have, in the past, provided financial advisory and
financing services to the Acquiror and the Company (including
having acted as dealer manager in connection with a tender offer
for certain of the Acquirors convertible bonds), and may
continue to do so and have received, and may receive, fees for
the rendering of such services. In addition, in the ordinary
course of our business, we may actively trade the Company Shares
and other securities of the Company, as well as the Acquiror
Shares and other securities of the Acquiror, for our own account
and for the accounts of customers and, accordingly, may at any
time hold a long or short position in such securities.
This opinion is for the use and benefit of the Board of
Directors of the Acquiror in connection with and for the purpose
of its evaluation of the Merger. Our opinion does not address
the merits of the underlying
C-2
decision by the Acquiror to engage in the Merger and does not
constitute a recommendation to any shareholder of the Acquiror
as to how such shareholder should vote with respect to the
proposed Merger or any matter related thereto. In addition, you
have not asked us to address, and this opinion does not address,
the fairness to, or any other consideration of, the holders of
any class of securities, creditors or other constituencies of
the Acquiror. We are not expressing any opinion herein as to the
prices at which the Acquiror Shares or the Company Shares will
trade following the announcement or consummation of the Merger.
This opinion may not be disclosed, referred to, or communicated
(in whole or in part) to any third party for any purpose
whatsoever except with our prior written approval. This opinion
may be reproduced in full in any prospectus or proxy or
information statement mailed to shareholders of the Company or
the Acquiror but may not otherwise be disclosed publicly in any
manner without our prior written approval.
On the basis of and subject to the foregoing, we are of the
opinion that, as of the date hereof, the Consideration to be
paid by the Acquiror pursuant to the proposed Merger is fair,
from a financial point of view, to the Acquiror.
Very truly yours,
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED
C-3
APPENDIX D
OPINION
OF CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC.
November 18,
2006
The Board of Directors
Phelps Dodge Corporation
One North Central Avenue
Phoenix, Arizona 85004
Members of the Board:
You have requested our opinion as to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to the holders of the common shares of
Phelps Dodge Corporation (the Company) of the Merger
Consideration (defined below) to be received by such holders
pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in
an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger
Agreement) to be entered into among the Company,
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc.
(Freeport) and Panther Acquisition Corporation, a
wholly owned subsidiary of Freeport (Merger Sub). As
more fully described in the Merger Agreement, (i) Merger
Sub will be merged with and into the Company (the
Merger) and (ii) each outstanding common share,
$6.25 par value, of the Company and the associated Company
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights (as defined in the Merger
Agreement) (the Company Common Stock), other than
shares held in treasury or held by Freeport, will be converted
into the right to receive (x) $88.00 in cash without
interest (the Cash Consideration) and (y) 0.67
of a fully paid, nonassessable share of Class B common
stock, $0.10 par value, of Freeport (the Freeport
Common Stock) (collectively with the Cash Consideration,
the Merger Consideration).
In arriving at our opinion, we reviewed a draft dated
November 17, 2006 of the Merger Agreement and held
discussions with certain senior officers, directors and other
representatives and advisors of the Company and certain senior
officers and other representatives and advisors of Freeport
concerning the business, operations and prospects of the
Company. We also reviewed the draft commitment letter, dated
November 17, 2006, to be received by Freeport from JP
Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., JP Morgan Securities Inc., Merrill
Lynch Capital Corporation and Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner & Smith Incorporated in connection with
financing the Merger (the Debt Financing Commitment
Letter). We examined certain publicly available business
and financial information relating to the Company as well as
certain financial forecasts and other information and data
relating to the Company and Freeport which were provided to or
discussed with us by the respective managements of the Company
and Freeport, including information relating to the potential
strategic implications and operational benefits (including the
amount, timing and achievability thereof) anticipated by the
managements of the Company and Freeport to result from the
Merger. We reviewed the financial terms of the Merger as set
forth in the Merger Agreement in relation to, among other
things: current and historical market prices and trading volumes
of the Company Common Stock and Freeport Common Stock; the
historical and projected earnings and other operating data of
the Company and Freeport; and the capitalization and financial
condition of the Company and Freeport. We considered, to the
extent publicly available, the financial terms of certain other
transactions which we considered relevant in evaluating the
Merger and analyzed certain financial, stock market and other
publicly available information relating to the businesses of
other companies whose operations we considered relevant in
evaluating those of the Company and Freeport. In addition to the
foregoing, we conducted such other analyses and examinations and
considered such other information and financial, economic and
market criteria as we deemed appropriate in arriving at our
opinion.
In rendering our opinion, we have assumed and relied, without
assuming any responsibility for independent verification, upon
the accuracy and completeness of all financial and other
information and data
D-1
publicly available or provided to or otherwise reviewed by or
discussed with us and upon the assurances of the managements of
the Company and Freeport that they are not aware of any relevant
information that has been omitted or that remains undisclosed to
us. With respect to financial forecasts and other information
and data relating to the Company and Freeport provided to or
otherwise reviewed by or discussed with us, we have been advised
by the respective managements of the Company and Freeport, that
such forecasts and other information and data were reasonably
prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available
estimates and judgments of the managements of the Company and
Freeport as to the future financial performance of the Company
and Freeport and, the potential strategic implications and
operational benefits (including the amount, timing and
achievability thereof) anticipated to result from the Merger and
the other matters covered thereby. We have assumed, with your
consent, that the Merger will be consummated in accordance with
its terms, without waiver, modification or amendment of any
material term, condition or agreement, that the financing of the
Merger will be consummated in accordance with the terms of the
Debt Financing Commitment Letter and that, in the course of
obtaining the necessary regulatory or third party approvals,
consents and releases for the Merger, no delay, limitation,
restriction or condition will be imposed that would have an
adverse effect on the Company, Freeport or the contemplated
benefits of the Merger. Representatives of the Company have
advised us, and we further have assumed, that the final terms of
the Merger Agreement will not vary materially from those set
forth in the draft reviewed by us. We are not expressing any
opinion as to what the value of the Freeport Common Stock
actually will be when issued pursuant to the Merger or the price
at which the Freeport Common Stock will trade at any time. We
have not made or been provided with an independent evaluation or
appraisal of the assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise)
of the Company or Freeport nor have we made any physical
inspection of the properties or assets of the Company or
Freeport. We were not requested to, and we did not, solicit
third party indications of interest in the possible acquisition
of all or a part of the Company, nor were we requested to
consider, and our opinion does not address, the relative merits
of the Merger as compared to any alternative business strategies
that might exist for the Company or the effect of any other
transaction in which the Company might engage. Our opinion is
necessarily based upon information available to us, and
financial, stock market and other conditions and circumstances
existing, as of the date hereof.
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. has acted as financial advisor to
the Company in connection with the proposed Merger and will
receive a fee for such services, a significant portion of which
is contingent upon the consummation of the Merger. We also will
receive a fee in connection with the delivery of this opinion.
We and our affiliates in the past have provided services to the
Company and Freeport unrelated to the proposed Merger, for which
services we and such affiliates have received compensation,
including, without limitation, acting as advisor and providing
financing commitments to the Company in connection with its
proposed combination with Inco Limited in June 2006 which was
subsequently terminated, acting as underwriter for the Company
in its Peruvian bond offering for Cerro Verde in April 2006,
acting as advisor to the Company in its sale of Columbian
Chemicals Company in March 2006, acting as underwriter in the
Companys sale of its investment in Southern Copper
Corporation in June 2005, acting as lead arranger in the
Companys $1.1 billion revolving credit facility in
May 2005, and acting as co-documentation agent in
Freeports $465 million revolving credit facility. In
the ordinary course of our business, we and our affiliates may
actively trade or hold the securities of the Company and
Freeport for our own account or for the account of our customers
and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position
in such securities. In addition, we and our affiliates
(including Citigroup Inc. and its affiliates) may maintain
relationships with the Company, Freeport and their respective
affiliates.
D-2
Our advisory services and the opinion expressed herein are
provided for the information of the Board of Directors of the
Company in its evaluation of the proposed Merger, and our
opinion is not intended to be and does not constitute a
recommendation to any stockholder as to how such stockholder
should vote or act on any matters relating to the proposed
Merger.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, our experience as
investment bankers, our work as described above and other
factors we deemed relevant, we are of the opinion that, as of
the date hereof, the Merger Consideration is fair, from a
financial point of view, to the holders of the Company Common
Stock.
Very truly yours,
CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC.
D-3
APPENDIX E
OPINION
OF MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED
November 18,
2006
Board of Directors
Phelps Dodge Corporation
One North Central Avenue
Phoenix, Arizona 85004
Members of the Board:
We understand that Phelps Dodge Corporation (the
Company), Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold
Inc. (Freeport) and Panther Acquisition Corporation,
a wholly owned subsidiary of Freeport (Merger Sub),
propose to enter into an Agreement and Plan of Merger,
substantially in the form of the draft dated November 17,
2006 (the Merger Agreement), which provides, among
other things, for the merger (the Merger) of Merger
Sub with and into the Company. Pursuant to the Merger, the
Company will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Freeport and
each outstanding common share, $6.25 par value, of the
Company and the associated Company Preferred Stock Purchase
Rights (as defined in the Merger Agreement) (the Company
Common Stock), other than shares held in treasury or held
by Freeport, will be converted into the right to receive
(i) $88.00 in cash without interest (the Cash
Consideration) and (ii) 0.67 of a fully paid,
nonassessable share of Class B common stock, $0.10 par
value, of Freeport (the Freeport Common Stock)
(collectively with the Cash Consideration, the Merger
Consideration). The terms and conditions of the Merger are
more fully set forth in the Merger Agreement.
You have asked for our opinion as to whether the Merger
Consideration to be received by the holders of shares of the
Company Common Stock pursuant to the Merger Agreement is fair
from a financial point of view to such holders.
For purposes of the opinion set forth herein, we have:
i) reviewed certain publicly available financial statements
and other business and financial information of the Company and
Freeport, respectively;
ii) reviewed certain internal financial statements and
other financial and operating data concerning the Company
prepared by the management of the Company;
iii) reviewed certain financial projections prepared by the
management of the Company;
iv) discussed the past and current operations and financial
condition and the prospects of the Company, with senior
executives of the Company;
v) reviewed certain internal financial statements and other
financial and operating data concerning Freeport prepared by the
management of Freeport;
vi) reviewed certain financial projections prepared by the
management of Freeport;
vii) discussed the past and current operations and
financial condition and the prospects of Freeport, with senior
executives of Freeport;
viii) discussed certain information relating to strategic,
financial and operational benefits anticipated from the Merger
and the strategic rationale for the Merger, with senior
executives of the Company and Freeport;
E-1
ix) reviewed the pro forma impact of the Merger on certain
financial ratios of the combined company;
x) reviewed the reported prices and trading activity for
the Company Common Stock and the Freeport Common Stock;
xi) compared the financial performance of the Company and
Freeport and the prices and trading activity of the Company
Common Stock and the Freeport Common Stock with that of certain
other publicly-traded companies comparable with the Company and
Freeport, respectively, and their securities;
xii) reviewed the financial terms, to the extent publicly
available, of certain comparable acquisition transactions;
xiii) participated in discussions and negotiations among
representatives of the Company, Freeport and their financial and
legal advisors;
xiv) reviewed draft commitment letter, dated
November 17, 2006, received by Freeport from JP Morgan
Chase Bank, N.A., JP Morgan Securities Inc., Merrill Lynch
Capital Corporation and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner &
Smith Incorporated in connection with financing the Merger
(collectively, the Debt Financing Commitment Letter);
xv) reviewed the draft Merger Agreement, dated
November 17, 2006, and certain related documents; and
xvi) considered such other factors and performed such other
analyses as we have deemed appropriate.
We have assumed and relied upon without independent verification
the accuracy and completeness of the information supplied or
otherwise made available to us by the Company and Freeport for
the purposes of this opinion. With respect to the financial
projections supplied to us or discussed with us, including
information relating to strategic, financial and operational
benefits anticipated from the Merger, we have assumed they have
been reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently
available estimates and judgments of the future financial
performance of the Company and Freeport. We have also relied
without independent verification on the assessments of
managements of the Company and Freeport, respectively, of the
strategic rationale of the Merger. In addition, we have assumed
that the Merger will be consummated in accordance with the terms
set forth in the Merger Agreement with no waiver, delay or
amendment of any other terms or conditions and that the
financing of the Merger will be consummated in accordance with
the terms set forth in the Debt Financing Commitment Letter. We
have assumed that in connection with the receipt of all the
necessary governmental, regulatory and other approvals and
consents required for the proposed Merger, no delays,
limitations, conditions or restrictions will be imposed that
would have a material adverse effect on the contemplated
benefits expected to be derived in the proposed Merger. We are
not legal, regulatory, accounting or tax experts and have
assumed the accuracy and veracity of assessments by such
advisors to the Company and Freeport with respect to such
issues. We have also relied upon, without independent
verification, the assessment by the managements of the Freeport
and the Company, respectively, of the timing and risks
associated with the integration of Freeport and the Company. We
have not made any independent valuation or appraisal of the
assets or liabilities of the Company or Freeport, nor have we
been furnished with any such appraisals. Our opinion is
necessarily based on financial, economic, market and other
conditions as in effect on, and the information made available
to us as of, the date hereof. Events occurring after the date
hereof may affect this opinion and the assumptions used in
preparing it, and we do not assume any obligation to update,
revise or reaffirm this opinion.
In arriving at our opinion, we were not authorized to solicit,
and did not solicit, interest from any party with respect to an
acquisition, business combination or other extraordinary
transaction involving the Company or any of its assets, nor did
we negotiate with any parties, other than Freeport, with respect
to the possible acquisition of the Company or certain of its
constituent businesses.
We have acted as financial advisor to the Board of Directors of
the Company in connection with the Merger and will receive a fee
for our services, a substantial portion of which is contingent
upon the
E-2
consummation of the Merger. In the past, Morgan
Stanley & Co. Incorporated (Morgan Stanley)
and its affiliates have provided financial advisory and
financing services for the Company and have received fees for
the rendering of these services. In addition, Morgan Stanley is
a full service securities firm engaged in securities,
commodities and currency trading, investment management and
brokerage services. In the ordinary course of our trading,
brokerage, investment management and financing activities,
Morgan Stanley or its affiliates may at any time hold long or
short positions, and may trade or otherwise effect transactions,
for our own account or the accounts of customers, in debt or
equity securities or senior loans of Freeport, the Company or
any other company or any currency or commodity that may be
involved in this transaction.
It is understood that this letter is for the information of the
Board of Directors of the Company and may not be disclosed or
referred to publicly or used for any other purpose without our
prior written consent, except that a copy of this opinion may be
included in its entirety, if required by applicable law, in any
filing made by the Company in respect of the Merger with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, this opinion
does not in any manner address the prices at which the Freeport
Common Stock will trade following the announcement of the Merger
or at any other time, and Morgan Stanley expresses no opinion or
recommendation as to how the shareholders of the Company and
Freeport should vote at the shareholders meetings held in
connection with the Merger.
Based on and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion on
the date hereof that the Merger Consideration to be received by
the holders of shares of the Company Common Stock pursuant to
the Merger Agreement is fair from a financial point of view to
such holders.
Very truly yours,
MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Joseph
M. Rault, III
|
Joseph M. Rault, III
Managing Director
E-3
|
|
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge Corporation |
|
c/o Corporate Election Services |
|
P.O. Box 3230 |
|
Pittsburgh, PA 15230 |
Vote by Internet or Telephone or Mail
24 Hours a Day, 7 Days a Week
Internet and telephone voting are available through
4:00 AM MST the day of the special meeting.
Vote by Telephone
Have your proxy card available when you call Toll-Free 1-888-693-8683 using a touch-tone phone
and follow the simple instructions to record your vote.
Vote by Internet
Have your proxy card available when you access the website www.cesvote.com and follow the
simple instructions to record your vote.
Vote by Mail
Please mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided
or return it to: Phelps Dodge Corporation, c/o Corporate Election
Services, P.O. Box 3230,
Pittsburgh, PA 15230.
Vote by Telephone
Call Toll-Free using a
touch-tone telephone:
1-888-693-8683
Vote by Internet
Access the Website and
cast your vote:
www.cesvote.com
Vote by Mail
Sign and return your proxy
in the postage-paid
envelope provided.
Your telephone or Internet vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same
manner as if you marked, signed and mailed your proxy card. If you vote your proxy by Internet
or by telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card.
Proxy card must be signed and dated below.
6 Please fold and detach card at perforation before mailing. 6
|
|
|
PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION
|
|
PROXY |
The proxies are instructed to vote as directed, and in their discretion on all other matters.
Where no direction is specified, this proxy will be voted FOR Proposals 1 and 2 as recommended by
the Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR PROPOSALS 1 and 2 below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN |
PROPOSAL 1: Approve
and adopt
the Agreement and
Plan of Merger,
dated as of
November 18, 2006,
among
Freeport-McMoRan
Copper and Gold
Inc., Phelps Dodge
Corporation and
Panther Acquisition
Corporation, as amended.
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN |
PROPOSAL 2: Approve the
adjournment of the
special meeting, if
necessary, to
permit solicitation
of additional
proxies in favor of
Proposal 1.
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature(s)
|
|
Date |
NOTE: Please sign name exactly as it appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as
attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. A
corporation should sign in its full corporate name by a duly authorized officer, stating such
officers title. A partnership should sign in the partnership name by an authorized person, stating
such persons title and relationship to the partnership. |
2
PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION
VOTE YOUR SHARES VIA THE INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE
Dear Shareholder:
Your vote is important and Phelps Dodge Corporation encourages you to submit your proxy
electronically via the Internet or by telephone, both of which are available 24 hours a day, seven
days a week. If you vote your proxy by Internet or by telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your
proxy card.
|
|
|
To submit your proxy electronically via the Internet, go to the Website: http://www.cesvote.com and follow the
prompts. You must use the control number printed in the box by the arrow on the reverse side of this card. |
|
|
|
|
To submit your proxy by telephone, use a touch-tone
telephone and call 1-888-693-8683. You must use the
control number printed in the box by the arrow on the
reverse side of this card. |
Also, you may view the Proxy Statement on the Internet at http://www.phelpsdodge.com.
If you have any questions or need assistance in voting, please call D. F. King & Co., Inc.
toll-free at 1-800-769-4414. Shareholders calling from outside the U.S. and Canada may call +44 20
7920 9700.
Your vote is important. Thank you for voting.
Proxy card must be signed and dated on the reverse side.
▼ Please fold and detach card at perforation before mailing.
▼
PROXY
Solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors of Phelps Dodge Corporation
The undersigned shareholder of PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION hereby appoints Timothy
R. Snider, Ramiro G. Peru and S. David Colton, each or any of them, proxies of the undersigned,
each with power of substitution, at the special meeting of shareholders of the Corporation to be
held at The Heard Museum, 2301 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona on March 14 at 10:00 am,
MST and at any adjournments thereof, to vote all Common Shares of the
Corporation held or owned by the undersigned, including any which may be held for the undersigneds
account under the Phelps Dodge Corporation Common Stock Investor Services Program administered by
Mellon Investor Services LLC.
For those participants who hold accounts with Common Shares through the Phelps Dodge Employee
Savings Plan and/or The Phelps Dodge Corporation Supplemental Savings Plan: the undersigned
instructs J.P. Morgan Chase Bank as Trustee for the Plans, to vote all shares or fractions of
shares credited to the account of the undersigned as of the record date, as directed on the reverse
side of this proxy. Those shares for which no directions are received will be voted by the Trustee
in its sole discretion.
3
|
|
|
|
|
Please mark this box if you
plan to attend the Special
Meeting
|
|
o
|
|
THIS PROXY IS CONTINUED ON THE REVERSE SIDE
PLEASE SIGN ON THE REVERSE SIDE AND MAIL PROMPTLY |
4