ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO. 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended May 5, 2007
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-12107
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
31-1469076 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
incorporation or organization) |
|
|
|
|
|
6301 Fitch Path, New Albany, OH
|
|
43054 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code (614) 283-6500
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former Fiscal year, if changed since last report.)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock
|
|
Outstanding at June 8, 2007 |
|
|
|
$.01 Par Value
|
|
88,065,240 Shares |
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF NET INCOME
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
May 5, 2007 |
|
|
April 29, 2006 |
|
|
NET SALES |
|
$ |
742,410 |
|
|
$ |
657,271 |
|
|
Cost of Goods Sold |
|
|
255,141 |
|
|
|
227,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS PROFIT |
|
|
487,269 |
|
|
|
429,915 |
|
|
Stores and Distribution Expense |
|
|
308,238 |
|
|
|
258,352 |
|
Marketing, General and Administrative Expense |
|
|
90,175 |
|
|
|
89,699 |
|
Other Operating Income, Net |
|
|
(3,854 |
) |
|
|
(2,121 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
|
92,710 |
|
|
|
83,985 |
|
|
Interest Income, Net |
|
|
(3,711 |
) |
|
|
(3,166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
|
96,421 |
|
|
|
87,151 |
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
|
36,340 |
|
|
|
30,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
60,081 |
|
|
$ |
56,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME PER SHARE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC |
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
DILUTED |
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC |
|
|
87,746 |
|
|
|
87,858 |
|
DILUTED |
|
|
92,292 |
|
|
|
91,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE |
|
$ |
0.175 |
|
|
$ |
0.175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments |
|
$ |
1,687 |
|
|
$ |
357 |
|
Unrealized Loss on Available-For-Sale Securities, net of taxes of
($12) and ($249) for the thirteen week periods ended May 5, 2007
and April 29, 2006, respectively |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(390 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,669 |
|
|
$ |
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
$ |
61,750 |
|
|
$ |
56,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 5, 2007 |
|
|
February 3, 2007 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Equivalents |
|
$ |
73,919 |
|
|
$ |
81,959 |
|
Marketable Securities |
|
|
268,052 |
|
|
|
447,793 |
|
Receivables |
|
|
49,052 |
|
|
|
43,240 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
401,753 |
|
|
|
427,447 |
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
33,753 |
|
|
|
33,170 |
|
Other Current Assets |
|
|
64,872 |
|
|
|
58,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
891,401 |
|
|
|
1,092,078 |
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET |
|
|
1,174,751 |
|
|
|
1,092,282 |
|
OTHER ASSETS |
|
|
65,028 |
|
|
|
63,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
2,131,180 |
|
|
$ |
2,248,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable |
|
$ |
85,445 |
|
|
$ |
100,919 |
|
Outstanding Checks |
|
|
26,386 |
|
|
|
27,391 |
|
Accrued Expenses |
|
|
223,077 |
|
|
|
260,219 |
|
Deferred Lease Credits |
|
|
36,385 |
|
|
|
35,423 |
|
Income Taxes Payable |
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
86,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
372,008 |
|
|
|
510,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG TERM LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
20,589 |
|
|
|
30,394 |
|
Deferred Lease Credits |
|
|
205,885 |
|
|
|
203,943 |
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
142,228 |
|
|
|
97,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LONG TERM LIABILITIES |
|
|
368,702 |
|
|
|
332,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock $0.01 par value: 150,000 shares
authorized and 103,300 shares issued at each of May 5,
2007
and February 3, 2007 |
|
|
1,033 |
|
|
|
1,033 |
|
Paid-In Capital |
|
|
291,041 |
|
|
|
289,732 |
|
Retained Earnings |
|
|
1,688,221 |
|
|
|
1,646,290 |
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Gain/(Loss), Net of Tax |
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
(994 |
) |
Treasury Stock, at Average Cost - 15,434 and 15,000
shares at May 5, 2007 and February 3, 2007, respectively |
|
|
(590,500 |
) |
|
|
(530,764 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
1,390,470 |
|
|
|
1,405,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
2,131,180 |
|
|
$ |
2,248,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
May 5, 2007 |
|
|
April 29, 2006 |
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
60,081 |
|
|
$ |
56,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of Other Operating Activities on Cash Flows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
|
|
42,410 |
|
|
|
32,227 |
|
Amortization of Deferred Lease Credits |
|
|
(9,045 |
) |
|
|
(8,233 |
) |
Share-Based Compensation |
|
|
5,222 |
|
|
|
10,857 |
|
Tax Benefit from Share-Based Compensation |
|
|
7,517 |
|
|
|
2,429 |
|
Excess Tax Benefit from Share-Based Compensation |
|
|
(6,018 |
) |
|
|
(1,988 |
) |
Deferred Taxes |
|
|
(10,388 |
) |
|
|
(3,461 |
) |
Loss on Disposal of Assets |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
1,574 |
|
Lessor Construction Allowances |
|
|
9,636 |
|
|
|
6,707 |
|
Changes in Assets and Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
26,019 |
|
|
|
21,237 |
|
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses |
|
|
(65,858 |
) |
|
|
(32,978 |
) |
Income Taxes |
|
|
(85,960 |
) |
|
|
(45,851 |
) |
Other Assets and Liabilities |
|
|
28,346 |
|
|
|
6,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
2,205 |
|
|
|
45,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures |
|
|
(113,624 |
) |
|
|
(76,800 |
) |
Purchases of Marketable Securities |
|
|
(236,228 |
) |
|
|
(668,082 |
) |
Proceeds from Sales of Marketable Securities |
|
|
416,149 |
|
|
|
728,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED FOR) INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
66,297 |
|
|
|
(15,962 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Share-Based Compensation |
|
|
13,348 |
|
|
|
3,718 |
|
Excess Tax Benefit from Share-Based Compensation |
|
|
6,018 |
|
|
|
1,988 |
|
Purchase of Treasury Stock |
|
|
(79,040 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in Outstanding Checks and Other |
|
|
(1,503 |
) |
|
|
(7,425 |
) |
Dividends Paid |
|
|
(15,365 |
) |
|
|
(15,371 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH USED FOR FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
(76,542 |
) |
|
|
(17,090 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND EQUIVALENTS: |
|
|
(8,040 |
) |
|
|
12,278 |
|
Cash and Equivalents, Beginning of Year |
|
|
81,959 |
|
|
|
50,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
73,919 |
|
|
$ |
62,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNIFICANT NON-CASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Accrual for Construction in Progress |
|
$ |
7,427 |
|
|
$ |
24,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (A&F), through its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, A&F
and its wholly-owned subsidiaries are referred to as the Company), is a specialty retailer
of high quality, casual apparel for men, women and kids with an active, youthful lifestyle.
The business was established in 1892.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the historical financial
statements of, and transactions applicable to, the Company and reflect the assets,
liabilities, results of operations and cash flows on a historical cost basis.
The Companys fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to January 31. Fiscal years are
designated in the financial statements and notes by the calendar year in which the fiscal
year commences. All references herein to Fiscal 2007 represent the 52-week fiscal year
that will end on February 2, 2008, and Fiscal 2006 represents the 53-week fiscal year that
ended February 3, 2007.
In accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 131,
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information (SFAS No. 131), the
Company determined its operating segments on the same basis it uses internally to evaluate
performance. The operating segments identified by the Company Abercrombie & Fitch,
abercrombie, Hollister and RUEHL have been aggregated and are reported as one reportable
financial segment. The Company aggregates its operating segments because they meet the
aggregation criteria set forth in paragraph 17 of SFAS No. 131. The Company believes its
operating segments may be aggregated for financial reporting purposes because they are
similar in each of the following areas: class of consumer, economic characteristics, nature
of products, nature of production processes and distribution methods. Revenues relating to
the Companys international sales for the thirteen week periods ended May 5, 2007 and April
29, 2006 were not material and are not reported separately from domestic revenues.
The condensed consolidated financial statements as of May 5, 2007 and for the thirteen week
periods ended May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006 are unaudited and are presented pursuant to the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, these
condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in A&Fs Annual Report on Form
10-K for Fiscal 2006 filed on March 30, 2007. The year-end condensed balance sheet data was
derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
reflect all adjustments (which are of a normal recurring nature) necessary to present fairly
the financial position and results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods, but
are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be anticipated for Fiscal
2007.
6
In connection with the Companys adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes An Interpretation
of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48) on February 4, 2007, a $2.8 million cumulative effect
adjustment was recorded as an adjustment to beginning of the year retained earnings. See
Note 8 for information about the adoption of FIN 48.
The condensed consolidated financial statements as of May 5, 2007 and for the thirteen week
periods ended May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006 included herein have been reviewed by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, and the report
of such firm follows the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is not subject to the liability provisions of Section 11 of the
Securities Act of 1933 (the Act) for their report on the unaudited financial information
because their report is not a report or a part of a registration statement prepared or
certified by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.
2. |
|
SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION |
Financial Statement Impact
Total share-based compensation expense was $5.2 million and $10.9 million for the thirteen
week periods ended May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006, respectively. Of the $5.2 million and
$10.9 million of expense, $0.1 million and $0.7 million was included in stores and
distribution expense as of May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006, respectively and $5.1 million and
$10.2 million was included in marketing, general and administrative expense as of May 5,
2007 and April 29, 2006, respectively. The Company also realized $7.5 million and $2.4
million in tax benefits for the thirteen week periods ended May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006,
respectively, related to share-based compensation.
The Company adjusts share-based compensation on a quarterly basis for actual forfeitures and
on an annual basis for changes to the estimate of expected award forfeitures based on actual
forfeiture experience. The effect of adjustments for actual forfeitures during the thirteen
week periods ended May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006 was immaterial.
The Company issues shares for stock option exercises and restricted stock unit vestings from
treasury stock. As of May 5, 2007, the Company had enough treasury stock available to cover
stock options and restricted stock units outstanding without having to repurchase additional
treasury stock.
7
Fair Value Estimates
The Company estimates the fair value of stock options granted using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model, which requires the Company to estimate the expected term of the stock
option grants and expected future stock price volatility over the term. The term represents
the expected period of time the Company believes the options will be outstanding based on
historical experience. Estimates of expected future stock price volatility are based on
the historic volatility of the Companys stock for the period equal to the expected term of
the stock option. The Company calculates the volatility as the annualized standard
deviation of the differences in the natural logarithms of the weekly stock closing price,
adjusted for stock splits.
The weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the thirteen
weeks ended May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006, as well as the assumptions used in calculating
such values, on the date of grant, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended |
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
May 5, 2007 |
|
|
April 29, 2006 |
|
|
|
Executive |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Executive |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Officers |
|
|
Associates |
|
|
Officers |
|
|
Associates |
|
Exercise price |
|
$ |
73.42 |
|
|
$ |
73.42 |
|
|
$ |
58.22 |
|
|
$ |
58.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
$ |
22.62 |
|
|
$ |
22.62 |
|
|
$ |
24.92 |
|
|
$ |
20.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price volatility |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
42 |
% |
Expected term (Years) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
In the case of restricted stock units, the Company calculates the fair value of the
restricted stock units granted as the market price of the underlying common stock on the
date of grant adjusted for anticipated dividend payments during the vesting period.
Stock Option Activity
Below is the summary of stock option activity for the Fiscal 2007 year-to-date period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Remaining |
|
Stock Options |
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
|
Contractual Life |
|
Outstanding at February 3, 2007 |
|
|
8,804,724 |
|
|
$ |
38.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
305,350 |
|
|
|
73.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(433,324 |
) |
|
|
29.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or cancelled |
|
|
(38,750 |
) |
|
|
56.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at May 5, 2007 |
|
|
8,638,000 |
|
|
$ |
39.68 |
|
|
$ |
337,959,159 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options expected to vest at May
5, 2007 |
|
|
651,322 |
|
|
$ |
63.04 |
|
|
$ |
10,267,101 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at May 5, 2007 |
|
|
7,854,600 |
|
|
$ |
37.30 |
|
|
$ |
325,994,962 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the thirteen weeks ended
May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006 was $22.0 million and $3.6 million, respectively.
8
As of May 5, 2007, there was $16.0 million of total unrecognized compensation cost, net of
estimated forfeitures, related to stock options. The unrecognized cost is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.6 years.
Restricted Stock Unit Activity
Below is the summary of restricted stock unit activity for the Fiscal 2007 year-to-date
period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
Restricted Stock Units |
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Non-vested at February 3, 2007 |
|
|
2,043,456 |
|
|
$ |
40.65 |
|
Granted |
|
|
477,500 |
|
|
$ |
70.59 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(219,909 |
) |
|
$ |
47.12 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(70,765 |
) |
|
$ |
57.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at May 5, 2007 |
|
|
2,230,282 |
|
|
$ |
45.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total fair value of restricted stock units granted during the thirteen weeks ended
May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006 was $33.7 million and $29.3 million, respectively.
The total fair value of restricted stock units vested during the thirteen weeks ended May 5,
2007 and April 29, 2006 was $10.5 million and $7.2 million, respectively.
As of May 5, 2007, there was $71.9 million of total unrecognized compensation cost, net of
estimated forfeitures, related to non-vested restricted stock units. The unrecognized cost
is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years.
Net income per share is computed in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Net
income per basic share is computed based on the weighted-average
number of outstanding shares of Common Stock. Net income per diluted share includes the weighted-average effect
of dilutive stock options and restricted stock units.
Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
May 5, 2007 |
|
|
April 29, 2006 |
|
Shares of Common Stock issued |
|
|
103,300 |
|
|
|
103,300 |
|
Treasury shares |
|
|
(15,554 |
) |
|
|
(15,442 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic shares outstanding |
|
|
87,746 |
|
|
|
87,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive effect of stock options
and restricted stock units |
|
|
4,546 |
|
|
|
3,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted shares outstanding |
|
|
92,292 |
|
|
|
91,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase shares of Common Stock that had exercise prices greater than the
average market price of the underlying shares during the thirteen week period ended May 5,
2007 were immaterial. Options to purchase approximately 0.2 million shares of Common Stock
during the thirteen week period ended April 29, 2006 were outstanding, but not included in
the computation of net income per diluted share because the options exercise prices were
greater than the average market price of the underlying shares.
9
Investments with original maturities greater than 90 days are accounted for in accordance
with SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities and
are classified accordingly by the Company at the time of purchase. As of May 5, 2007, the
Companys investments in marketable securities consisted primarily of investment grade
municipal notes and bonds and investment grade auction rate securities, all classified as
available-for-sale and reported at fair value based on the market, with maturities that
could range from one month to 40 years.
Municipal notes and bonds may have early redemption provisions at predetermined prices. For
the thirteen week periods ended May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006, there were no realized gains
or losses. Net unrealized holding losses were approximately $0.7 million as of May 5, 2007
and February 3, 2007.
The interest rates of auction rate securities reset through an auction process at
predetermined periods ranging from seven to 49 days. Due to the frequent nature of the
reset feature, the investments market prices approximate their fair value; therefore, there
are no realized or unrealized gains or losses associated with these marketable securities.
The Company held $268.1 million and $447.8 million in marketable securities as of May 5,
2007 and February 3, 2007, respectively.
The Company established an irrevocable rabbi trust (the Rabbi Trust) during the third
quarter of Fiscal 2006, the purpose of which is to be a source of funds to match respective
funding obligations to participants in the Abercrombie & Fitch Nonqualified Savings and
Supplemental Retirement Plan and the Chief Executive Officer Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan. As of May 5, 2007, total assets related to the Rabbi Trust were $34.2
million, which included $18.5 million held in money market accounts and $15.7 million
related to the cash surrender value of trust owned life insurance policies. As of February
3, 2007, total assets related to the Rabbi Trust were $33.5 million, which included $18.3
million held in money market accounts and $15.3 million related to the cash surrender value
of trust owned life insurance policies. The Rabbi Trust assets are consolidated in
accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force 97-14 and recorded at fair value in other assets
on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and are restricted to their use as noted above.
Inventories are principally valued at the lower of average cost or market utilizing the
retail method. The Company determines market value as the anticipated future selling price
of the merchandise less a normal margin. Therefore, an initial markup is applied to
inventory at cost in order to establish a cost-to-retail ratio. Permanent markdowns, when
taken, reduce both the retail and cost components of inventory on hand so as to maintain the
already established cost-to-retail relationship.
10
The fiscal year is comprised of two principal selling seasons: Spring (the first and second
quarters) and Fall (the third and fourth quarters). The Company classifies its inventory
into three categories: spring fashion, fall fashion and basic. The Company reduces
inventory valuation at the end of the first and third quarters to reserve for projected
inventory markdowns required to sell through the current season inventory prior to the
beginning of the following season. Additionally, the Company reduces inventory at season
end by recording a markdown reserve that represents the estimated future selling price
decreases necessary to sell through the remaining carryover fashion inventory for the season
just passed. The markdown reserve was $30.2 million, $6.8 million and $30.8 million at May
5, 2007, February 3, 2007 and April 29, 2006, respectively. The inventory valuation at
February 3, 2007 reflects the estimated markdowns necessary to sell through fashion
carryover inventory on hand at the end of the Fall season.
Further, as part of inventory valuation, inventory shrinkage estimates, based on historical
trends from actual physical inventories, are made that reduce the inventory value for lost
or stolen items. The Company performs physical inventories throughout the year and adjusts
the shrink reserve accordingly. The shrink reserve was $12.4 million, $7.7 million and $7.9
million at May 5, 2007, February 3, 2007 and April 29, 2006, respectively.
6. |
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET |
Property and equipment, net, consisted of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 5, 2007 |
|
|
February 3, 2007 |
|
Property and equipment, at cost |
|
$ |
1,791,133 |
|
|
$ |
1,669,053 |
|
Accumulated depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
(616,382 |
) |
|
|
(576,771 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
1,174,751 |
|
|
$ |
1,092,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
|
DEFERRED LEASE CREDITS |
Deferred lease credits are derived from payments received from landlords to partially offset
store construction costs and are classified between current and long-term liabilities. The
amounts, which are amortized over the life of the related leases, consisted of the following
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 5, 2007 |
|
|
February 3, 2007 |
|
Deferred lease credits |
|
$ |
435,362 |
|
|
$ |
423,390 |
|
Amortized deferred lease credits |
|
|
(193,092 |
) |
|
|
(184,024 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred lease credits, net |
|
$ |
242,270 |
|
|
$ |
239,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes is based on the current estimate of the annual effective tax
rate adjusted to reflect the tax impact of items discrete to the thirteen weeks ended May 5,
2007. Cash payments of income taxes made during the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2007 and
April 29, 2006 were approximately $89.6 million and $78.2 million, respectively.
11
The effective tax rate for the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2007 was 37.7% as compared to
35.5% for the Fiscal 2006 comparable period.
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation
No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes An Interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in a Companys financial statements in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This interpretation prescribes
a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition
and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This
interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
In connection with the Companys adoption of FIN 48 on February 4, 2007, a $2.8 million
cumulative effect adjustment was recorded as an adjustment to beginning of the year retained
earnings. The Companys unrecognized tax benefits as of February 4, 2007 (excluding
interest and penalties) were $29.6 million, which were reclassed from
current tax payables to other long-term liabilities. These amounts, if recognized, would
affect the Companys effective tax rate.
The statute of limitations for income tax examinations
by the Internal Revenue Service has expired for years ending before
January 31, 2004. The Company files income tax returns in various
state, local and foreign jurisdictions with varying statutes of
limitations.
The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits
as a component of tax expense. The Companys policy did not change as a result of adopting
FIN 48. The total amount of interest and penalties accrued on February 4, 2007, the date of
adoption, was $7.3 million.
As of May 5, 2007 the amount of unrecognized tax benefits did not materially change from the
date of adoption. The Company does not expect material adjustments to the total amount of
unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months, but the outcome of tax matters is
uncertain and unforeseen results can occur.
On December 15, 2004, the Company entered into an amended and restated $250 million
syndicated unsecured credit agreement (the Amended Credit Agreement). The primary purposes
of the Amended Credit Agreement are for trade and stand-by letters of credit and working
capital. The Amended Credit Agreement has several borrowing options, including an option
where interest rates are based on the agent banks Alternate Base Rate, and another using
the London Interbank Offered Rate. The facility fees payable under the Amended Credit
Agreement are based on the ratio of the Companys leverage total debt plus 600% of forward
minimum rent commitments to consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation,
amortization and rent for the trailing four fiscal quarter periods. The facility fees are
projected to accrue at either 0.15% or 0.175% on the committed amounts per annum. The
Amended Credit Agreement contains limitations on indebtedness, liens, sale-leaseback
transactions, significant corporate changes (including mergers and acquisitions with third
parties), investments, restricted payments (including dividends and stock repurchases) and transactions with affiliates. The Amended Credit
12
Agreement will mature on December 15, 2009. Letters of credit totaling approximately $48.3
million and $53.7 million were outstanding under the Amended Credit Agreement on May 5, 2007
and February 3, 2007, respectively. No borrowings were outstanding under the Amended Credit
Agreement on May 5, 2007 or on February 3, 2007.
A&F is a defendant in lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business.
On June 23, 2006, Lisa Hashimoto, et al. v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Abercrombie & Fitch
Stores, Inc., was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of
Los Angeles. In that action, three plaintiffs allege, on behalf of a putative class of
California store managers employed in Hollister and abercrombie stores, that they were
entitled to receive overtime pay as non-exempt employees under California wage and hour
laws. The complaint seeks injunctive relief, equitable relief, unpaid overtime
compensation, unpaid benefits, penalties, interest and attorneys fees and costs. The
defendants filed an answer to the complaint on August 21, 2006. The parties are engaging in
discovery.
On September 2, 2005, a purported class action, styled Robert Ross v. Abercrombie & Fitch
Company, et al., was filed against A&F and certain of its officers in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Ohio on behalf of a purported class of all
persons who purchased or acquired shares of A&Fs Common Stock between June 2, 2005 and
August 16, 2005. In September and October of 2005, five other purported class actions were
subsequently filed against A&F and other defendants in the same Court. All six securities
cases allege claims under the federal securities laws, and seek unspecified monetary
damages, as a result of a decline in the price of A&Fs Common Stock during the summer of
2005. On November 1, 2005, a motion to consolidate all of these purported class actions
into the first-filed case was filed by some of the plaintiffs. A&F joined in that motion.
On March 22, 2006, the motions to consolidate were granted, and these actions (together with
the federal court derivative cases described in the following paragraph) were consolidated
for purposes of motion practice, discovery and pretrial proceedings. A consolidated amended
securities class action complaint was filed on August 14, 2006. On October 13, 2006, all
defendants moved to dismiss that complaint. The motion has been fully briefed and is
pending.
On September 16, 2005,
a derivative action, styled The Booth Family Trust v. Michael S.
Jeffries, et al., was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of
Ohio, naming A&F as a nominal defendant and seeking to assert claims for unspecified damages
against nine of A&Fs present and former directors, alleging various breaches of the
directors fiduciary duty and seeking equitable and monetary relief. In the following three
months (October, November and December of 2005), four similar derivative actions were filed
(three in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio and one in the
Court of Common Pleas for Franklin County, Ohio) against present and former directors of A&F
alleging various breaches of the directors fiduciary duty and seeking equitable and
monetary relief. A&F is also a nominal defendant in each of the four later derivative
actions. On November 4, 2005, a motion to consolidate all of the federal court derivative
actions with the purported securities law class actions described in the preceding paragraph
was filed. On March 22, 2006, the motion to consolidate was granted, and the federal
court derivative actions have been consolidated with the aforesaid
purported securities law class actions for purposes of motion practice, discovery
and pretrial proceedings. A consolidated amended derivative complaint was filed in the federal
proceeding on July 10, 2006. A&F filed a motion to stay the consolidated federal derivative
case and that motion has been granted. The state court action has also been stayed. On
February 16, 2007, A&F announced its Board of Directors received a report of its Special
Litigation Committee established by the Board to investigate and act with respect to claims
asserted in certain previously disclosed derivative lawsuits brought against current and
former directors and management, including Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Michael S.
Jeffries. The Special Litigation Committee has concluded that there is no evidence to
support the asserted claims and directed the Company to seek dismissal of the derivative
actions. A&F has advised both the federal and state courts in which the derivative actions
are pending, that it believes the derivative cases should be stayed until the pending motion
to dismiss the related consolidated securities cases has been finally decided, as described
in the preceding paragraph.
13
In December 2005, the Company received a formal order of investigation from the SEC
concerning trading in shares of A&Fs Common Stock. The SEC has requested information from
A&F and certain of its current and former officers and directors. The Company and its
personnel are cooperating fully with the SEC.
Management intends to defend the aforesaid matters vigorously, as appropriate. Management
is unable to assess the potential exposure of the aforesaid matters. However, managements
assessment of the Companys current exposure could change in the event of the discovery of
additional facts with respect to legal matters pending against the Company or determinations
by judges, juries or other finders of fact that are not in accord with managements
evaluation of the claims.
11. |
|
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS |
In September 2006, the FASB released FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157 establishes a common definition for fair value under GAAP
and also establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure
requirements about such fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 will be effective for the
Company on February 3, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact on
the consolidated financial statements of adopting SFAS No. 157.
In February 2007, the FASB released FASB Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159 permits
companies to measure many financial instruments and certain other assets and liabilities at
fair value on an instrument by instrument basis. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation
and disclosure requirements to facilitate comparisons between companies that select
different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 159
will be effective for the Company on February 3, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating
the potential impact on the consolidated financial statements of adopting SFAS No. 159.
14
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and
Shareholders of Abercrombie & Fitch Co.:
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
and its subsidiaries as of May 5, 2007, and the related condensed consolidated statements of net
income and comprehensive income for the thirteen week periods ended May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006
and the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the thirteen week periods ended May 5,
2007 and April 29, 2006. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying
analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which
is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly,
we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the
accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have previously audited in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of February 3, 2007 and the
related consolidated statements of net income and comprehensive income, of shareholders equity,
and of cash flows for the year then ended (not present herein), and in our report dated March 30,
2007, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our
opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of
February 3, 2007, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the consolidated balance
sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Columbus, Ohio
June 12, 2007
15
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
OVERVIEW
The Companys fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to January 31. Fiscal years are designated
in the financial statements and notes by the calendar year in which the fiscal year commences. All
references herein to Fiscal 2007 represent the 52-week fiscal year that will end on February 2,
2008, and Fiscal 2006 represents the 53-week fiscal year that ended February 3, 2007.
For purposes of Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, the thirteen week period ended May 5, 2007 is compared to the thirteen week period
ended April 29, 2006. Comparable store sales, however, compare the thirteen week period ended May
5, 2007 to the thirteen week period ended May 6, 2006.
The Company operates four brands: Abercrombie & Fitch, a fashion-oriented casual apparel business
directed at 18 to 22 year-old collegiate men and women with a youthful lifestyle, abercrombie, a
fashion-oriented casual apparel brand in the tradition of Abercrombie & Fitch style and quality,
targeted at seven to 14 year-old boys and girls; Hollister, a West Coast-oriented lifestyle brand
targeted at 14 to 17 year-old high school guys (dudes) and girls (bettys), at lower price
points than Abercrombie & Fitch; and RUEHL, a fashion-oriented mix of traditional casual and trend
fashion displaying high quality clothing, leather goods and lifestyle accessories, targeted at 22
to 35 year-old modern-minded, post-college consumers. In addition to predominantly mall-based
store locations, Abercrombie & Fitch, abercrombie and Hollister also offer websites where products
comparable to those carried at the stores can be purchased.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
During the first quarter of Fiscal 2007, net sales increased 13% to $742.4 million from $657.3
million in the first quarter of Fiscal 2006. Operating income increased to $92.7 million in the
first quarter of Fiscal 2007 from $84.0 million in the first quarter of Fiscal 2006. Net income
increased to $60.1 million in the first quarter of Fiscal 2007 compared to $56.2 million in the
first quarter of Fiscal 2006. Net income per diluted weighted-average share was $0.65 in the first
quarter of Fiscal 2007 compared to $0.62 in the first quarter of Fiscal 2006.
Due to seasonal variations in the retail industry, the results of operations for any current period
are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full fiscal year or of future
financial results. The seasonality of the Companys operations may also lead to significant
fluctuations in certain asset and liability accounts.
16
The following data represent the amounts shown in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Income for the thirteen week periods ended May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006, expressed as a
percentage of net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
May 5, 2007 |
|
|
April 29, 2006 |
|
NET SALES |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Goods Sold |
|
|
34.4 |
% |
|
|
34.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS PROFIT |
|
|
65.6 |
% |
|
|
65.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stores and Distribution Expense |
|
|
41.5 |
% |
|
|
39.3 |
% |
Marketing, General and
Administrative Expense |
|
|
12.1 |
% |
|
|
13.6 |
% |
Other Operating Income, Net |
|
|
(0.5 |
)% |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
|
12.5 |
% |
|
|
12.8 |
% |
Interest Income, Net |
|
|
(0.5 |
)% |
|
|
(0.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
13.3 |
% |
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
Financial Summary
The following summarized financial and statistical data compares the thirteen week period ended May
5, 2007 to the thirteen week period ended April 29, 2006, except for comparable store sales
information which compares the thirteen week period ended May 5, 2007 to the thirteen week period
ended May 6, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
|
May 5, 2007 |
|
April 29, 2006 |
|
% Change |
Net sales by brand (in thousands) |
|
$ |
742,410 |
|
|
$ |
657,271 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Abercrombie & Fitch |
|
$ |
333,343 |
|
|
$ |
312,719 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
abercrombie |
|
$ |
89,149 |
|
|
$ |
79,473 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Hollister |
|
$ |
309,668 |
|
|
$ |
259,507 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
RUEHL* |
|
$ |
10,250 |
|
|
$ |
5,572 |
|
|
|
84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(decrease) in comparable store sales** |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Abercrombie & Fitch |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
abercrombie |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Hollister |
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
RUEHL* |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail sales increase attributable to new
and remodeled stores, websites and catalogue |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net retail sales per average store (in thousands) |
|
$ |
729 |
|
|
$ |
737 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
Abercrombie & Fitch |
|
$ |
845 |
|
|
$ |
825 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
abercrombie |
|
$ |
458 |
|
|
$ |
460 |
|
|
nm |
Hollister |
|
$ |
749 |
|
|
$ |
781 |
|
|
|
(4 |
)% |
RUEHL* |
|
$ |
674 |
|
|
$ |
645 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net retail sales per average gross square foot |
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
Abercrombie & Fitch |
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
abercrombie |
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
|
(2 |
)% |
Hollister |
|
$ |
113 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
|
(5 |
)% |
RUEHL* |
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions per average retail store |
|
|
11,518 |
|
|
|
11,868 |
|
|
|
(3 |
)% |
Abercrombie & Fitch |
|
|
10,759 |
|
|
|
11,161 |
|
|
|
(4 |
)% |
abercrombie |
|
|
7,198 |
|
|
|
7,268 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
Hollister |
|
|
14,278 |
|
|
|
15,085 |
|
|
|
(5 |
)% |
RUEHL* |
|
|
8,392 |
|
|
|
7,212 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average retail transaction value |
|
$ |
63.31 |
|
|
$ |
62.09 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Abercrombie & Fitch |
|
$ |
78.50 |
|
|
$ |
73.95 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
abercrombie |
|
$ |
63.58 |
|
|
$ |
63.27 |
|
|
nm |
Hollister |
|
$ |
52.43 |
|
|
$ |
51.78 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
RUEHL* |
|
$ |
80.28 |
|
|
$ |
89.40 |
|
|
|
(10 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average units per retail transaction |
|
|
2.39 |
|
|
|
2.32 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Abercrombie & Fitch |
|
|
2.36 |
|
|
|
2.25 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
abercrombie |
|
|
2.80 |
|
|
|
2.73 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Hollister |
|
|
2.32 |
|
|
|
2.28 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
RUEHL* |
|
|
2.60 |
|
|
|
2.52 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average unit retail sold |
|
$ |
26.49 |
|
|
$ |
26.76 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
Abercrombie & Fitch |
|
$ |
33.26 |
|
|
$ |
32.87 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
abercrombie |
|
$ |
22.71 |
|
|
$ |
23.18 |
|
|
|
(2 |
)% |
Hollister |
|
$ |
22.60 |
|
|
$ |
22.71 |
|
|
nm |
RUEHL* |
|
$ |
30.88 |
|
|
$ |
35.48 |
|
|
|
(13 |
)% |
|
|
|
* |
|
Net sales for RUEHL during the first quarter of Fiscal 2007 and Fiscal 2006, and the related statistics, reflect the activity
of 16 stores open in first quarter Fiscal 2007 and ten stores open in first quarter Fiscal 2006. As a result, year-over-year
comparisons may not be meaningful. |
|
** |
|
A store is included in comparable store sales when it has been open as the same brand 12 months or more and its square
footage has not been expanded or reduced by more than 20% within the past year. |
18
CURRENT TRENDS AND OUTLOOK
During the first quarter of Fiscal 2007, the Company achieved its fundamental goal, enhancing the
brands and investing in the long term without sacrificing short-term performance.
The Company took a major step in developing the international component of its growth initiative
with the opening of the Abercrombie & Fitch London Flagship in March 2007. The initial performance
of the store has exceeded the Companys expectations. The London Flagship store is tracking to
generate more sales per selling square foot and a higher store contribution margin than the 5th
Avenue Flagship store, which generates a higher store contribution margin than the average
Abercrombie & Fitch store. In addition, the United Kingdom (U.K.) web business has increased
significantly following the opening of the London Flagship store. The success of the London
Flagship store has helped define the scope of international growth prospects for the Company. A
key part of international growth potential will be in Asia, and the Company is pursuing
lease space in Tokyo for the Abercrombie & Fitch brand, which could result in the opening of a
Flagship store. Additionally, due to the strength of existing Canadian stores, the Company is
assessing additional opportunities for brands in multiple Canadian markets. Two abercrombie stores
are planned to open in Canada during 2008.
During the first quarter, the Company renewed its commitment to the direct-to-consumer business
with enhancements to its websites that more closely align the websites with the in-store
environment and heritage of the brands. Furthermore, the web business benefited from a stronger
in-stock inventory position and a more targeted e-mail marketing strategy. The Company also
strengthened direct-to-consumer operations to fulfill orders more quickly and provide improved
customer service. Direct-to-consumer sales increased 43% during the first quarter of Fiscal 2007.
The Company made meaningful progress towards improving the store contribution margin of the RUEHL
stores during the first quarter. The Company is in the process of developing a new store prototype
which will result in a smaller store format that should increase
efficiency without impacting the stores merchandise capacity. The Company believes these changes will enhance
projected returns while resulting in a more intimate shopping experience. The Company continues to
expect RUEHL to achieve store profitability for the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2007.
Investments in home office infrastructure and technology during the quarter reflected a
continuation of the Companys actions over the past few years.
19
FIRST QUARTER RESULTS
Net Sales
Net sales for the first quarter of Fiscal 2007 were $742.4 million, an increase of 13% over net
sales of $657.3 million during the first quarter of Fiscal 2006. The net sales increase was
attributed to the combination of the net addition of 108 stores, including the Abercrombie & Fitch
London Flagship store and and a 43% increase in the direct-to-consumer business, partially offset
by a 4% decrease in comparable store sales.
Abercrombie & Fitch comparable store sales decreased 4% with womens comparable store sales
decreasing by a mid single-digit and mens comparable store sales decreasing by a low single-digit.
In abercrombie, comparable store sales decreased 2% with girls and boys posting a low single-digit
decrease. In Hollister, comparable store sales decreased 5% with bettys declining by a mid
single-digit and dudes posting a low single-digit decrease. RUEHL comparable store sales decreased
3% with mens comparable store sales decreasing by a high single-digit and womens comparable store
sales remaining flat.
Regionally, comparable store sales were strongest in the North Atlantic and weakest in the West.
With the exception of the North Atlantic, all regions posted negative comparable store sales.
From a merchandise classification standpoint, across all brands, tops continue to perform well,
outperforming bottoms in each of the male and female businesses.
Net direct-to-consumer merchandise sales through the Companys websites and catalogue for the first
quarter of Fiscal 2007 were $43.5 million, an increase of 43% over Fiscal 2006 first quarter net
sales of $30.4 million. Shipping and handling revenue for the first quarter of Fiscal 2007 was
$6.6 million compared to $4.8 million for the corresponding period in Fiscal 2006. The total
direct-to-consumer business accounted for 6.7% of net sales in the first quarter of Fiscal 2007
compared to 5.4% in the first quarter of Fiscal 2006.
Gross Profit
Gross profit for the first quarter of Fiscal 2007 was $487.3 million compared to $429.9 million for
the comparable period in Fiscal 2006. The gross profit rate (gross profit divided by net sales)
for the first quarter of Fiscal 2007 was 65.6%, up 20 basis points from the first quarter of Fiscal
2006 rate of 65.4%. The increase in the gross profit rate primarily reflects an improved initial
markup, partially offset by a slightly higher markdown rate.
Stores and Distribution Expense
Stores and distribution expense for the first quarter of Fiscal 2007 was $308.2 million compared to
$258.4 million for the comparable period in Fiscal 2006. For the first quarter of Fiscal 2007, the
stores and distribution expense rate (stores and distribution expense divided by net sales) was
41.5% compared to 39.3% in the first quarter of Fiscal 2006. The increase in the rate resulted
primarily from the Companys inability to leverage rent and other fixed costs due to the comparable
store sales decrease. Increases in variable costs were driven by higher minimum wage rates, increased
store manager compensation and pre-opening costs associated with the Abercrombie & Fitch London
Flagship store. These increases were partially offset by a reduction of payroll hours and other
controllable expenses, which the Company adjusted in response to negative sales trends during the
quarter.
20
Distribution center productivity, as measured in units processed per labor hour (UPH), was flat
during the first quarter of Fiscal 2007 as compared to the first quarter of Fiscal 2006. The
Company expects the UPH level to increase compared to last year during the remainder of Fiscal 2007.
Marketing, General and Administrative Expense
Marketing, general and administrative expense during the first quarter of Fiscal 2007 was $90.2
million compared to $89.7 million during the same period in Fiscal 2006. For the first quarter of
Fiscal 2007, the marketing, general and administrative expense rate (marketing, general and
administrative expense divided by net sales) was 12.1% compared to 13.6% for the first quarter of
Fiscal 2006. The decrease in the rate was primarily due to home office payroll expense, which was
flat compared to Fiscal 2006, primarily as a result of a decrease in share-based compensation expense. The
decrease in the rate was also due to reductions in travel, outside services and other home office
expenses in the first quarter of Fiscal 2007.
Other Operating Income, Net
First quarter other operating income for Fiscal 2007 was $3.9 million compared to $2.1 million for
the first quarter of Fiscal 2006. The increase was primarily related to gift cards for which the
Company has determined the likelihood of redemption to be remote and gains related to foreign
currency transactions. First quarter of Fiscal 2006 included other operating income related to
insurance reimbursement for a fire-damaged store.
Operating Income
Operating income for the first quarter of Fiscal 2007 increased to $92.7 million from $84.0 million
in the first quarter of Fiscal 2006, an increase of 10.4%. The operating income rate (operating
income divided by net sales) was 12.5% for the first quarter of Fiscal 2007 compared to 12.8% for
the first quarter of Fiscal 2006.
Interest Income, Net and Income Tax Expense
First quarter net interest income was $3.7 million in Fiscal 2007 compared to $3.2 million in the
first quarter of Fiscal 2006. The increase in net interest income was due to higher interest rates
during the first quarter of Fiscal 2007 when compared to the first quarter of Fiscal 2006.
The effective tax rate for the first quarter of Fiscal 2007 was 37.7% as compared to 35.5% for the
Fiscal 2006 comparable period. The effective tax rate in the first quarter of Fiscal 2007
primarily reflected the favorable impact of tax exempt investment income, while the effective tax
rate in the first quarter of Fiscal 2006 reflected the favorable impact of the settlement of a tax
audit.
The Company estimates the annual effective tax rate for Fiscal 2007 will be approximately 39%,
exclusive of the impact of any items that are discrete to the interim periods. This rate may
fluctuate based upon the level of profits in various jurisdictions in which the Company operates.
21
Net Income and Net Income per Share
Net income for the first quarter of Fiscal 2007 was $60.1 million versus $56.2 million for the
first quarter of Fiscal 2006, an increase of 6.9%. Net income per diluted weighted-average share
outstanding for the first quarter of Fiscal 2007 was $0.65 versus $0.62 for the same period of
Fiscal 2006.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash provided by operating activities provides the resources to support operations, including
projected growth, seasonal requirements and capital expenditures. A summary of the Companys
working capital position and capitalization follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 5, 2007 |
|
|
February 3, 2007 |
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
519,393 |
|
|
$ |
581,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
$ |
1,390,470 |
|
|
$ |
1,405,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities, the Companys primary source of liquidity, totaled $2.2
million for the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2007 versus $45.3 million for the comparable period in
Fiscal 2006. Cash in first quarter of Fiscal 2007 was provided primarily by current year net
income, adjusted for depreciation and amortization, share-based compensation charges and lessor
construction allowances collected, decreases in inventory and changes in other assets and
liabilities related to the adoption of FIN 48. Uses of cash primarily consisted of decreases in
accounts payable and accrued expenses and income taxes payable. Income taxes payable primarily
decreased due to payments during the quarter and the adoption of FIN 48. Accounts payable
decreased due to payments and accrued expenses decreased due to the timing of the payroll cycle,
the annual contribution to the qualified retirement plan, the payment of the Fall 2006 incentive
bonus and the redemption of gift cards during the quarter.
Investing Activities
Cash inflows from investing activities were generated by sales of marketable securities. Cash
outflows for investing activities were for purchases of marketable securities and capital
expenditures (see the discussion in Capital Expenditures and Lessor Construction Allowances)
primarily related to new store construction, the purchase of an airplane and other construction in
progress. As of May 5, 2007, the Company held $268.1 million of marketable securities with
original maturities of greater than 90 days.
Financing Activities
Financing activities for the thirteen week period ended May 5, 2007 consisted of $79.0 million for
the repurchase of treasury stock, $15.4 million for the payment of the $0.175 per share quarterly
dividend on March 27, 2007 and $13.3 million received in connection with stock option exercises.
22
During the first quarter of Fiscal 2007, the Company repurchased approximately 1.0 million shares
of A&Fs Common Stock. As of May 5, 2007, approximately 4.7 million shares were available for
repurchase as part of the August 2005 A&F Board of Directors authorization to repurchase six
million shares of A&Fs Common Stock.
The Company has $250 million available (less outstanding letters of credit) under its Amended
Credit Agreement to support operations. Trade letters of credit totaling approximately $43.7
million and $48.8 million were outstanding on May 5, 2007 and February 3, 2007, respectively. No
loans were outstanding on May 5, 2007 or February 3, 2007.
Standby letters of credit totaling approximately $4.6 million and $4.9 million were outstanding on
May 5, 2007 and February 3, 2007. The standby letters of credit are set to expire primarily during
the fourth quarter of this fiscal year. The beneficiary, a merchandise supplier, has the right to
draw upon the standby letters of credit if the Company declares bankruptcy. To date, the
beneficiary has not drawn upon the standby letters of credit.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of May 5, 2007 the Company did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Contractual Obligations
The Companys contractual obligations consist primarily of letters of credit outstanding, operating
leases, purchase orders for merchandise inventory and other agreements to purchase goods and
services that are legally binding and that require minimum quantities to be purchased. These
contractual obligations impact the Companys short and longterm liquidity and capital resource
needs. There have been no material changes in the Companys contractual obligations since February
3, 2007, other than those which occur in the normal course of business (primarily changes in the
Companys merchandise inventory-related purchases and lease obligations, which fluctuate throughout
the year as a result of the seasonal nature of the Companys operations) and changes resulting from
the adoption of FIN 48 as described in Note 8 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
23
Store Count and Gross Square Feet
Store count and gross square footage by brand for the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2007 and April
29, 2006, respectively, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Store Activity |
|
Abercrombie & Fitch |
|
|
abercrombie |
|
|
Hollister |
|
|
RUEHL |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 3, 2007 |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remodels/Conversions (net activity) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
(1) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closed |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 5, 2007 |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Square Feet
(thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 3, 2007 |
|
|
3,171 |
|
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
2,604 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
6,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remodels/Conversions (net activity) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
(1) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closed |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 5, 2007 |
|
|
3,173 |
|
|
|
801 |
|
|
|
2,651 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
6,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Store Size |
|
|
8,838 |
|
|
|
4,450 |
|
|
|
6,644 |
|
|
|
9,313 |
|
|
|
7,101 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes one RUEHL store reopened after being temporarily closed due to fire. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Store Activity |
|
Abercrombie & Fitch |
|
|
abercrombie |
|
|
Hollister |
|
|
RUEHL |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 29, 2006 |
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remodels/Conversions (net activity) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closed |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 29, 2006 |
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Square Feet
(thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 29, 2006 |
|
|
3,157 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
2,083 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
6,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remodels/Conversions (net activity) |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closed |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 29, 2006 |
|
|
3,039 |
|
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
2,143 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
5,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Store Size |
|
|
8,733 |
|
|
|
4,373 |
|
|
|
6,554 |
|
|
|
8,900 |
|
|
|
7,063 |
|
24
Capital Expenditures and Lessor Construction Allowances
Capital expenditures totaled $113.6 million and $76.8 million for the thirteen week periods ended
May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006, respectively. Additionally, the non-cash accrual for construction
in progress increased $7.4 million for the thirteen week period ended May 5, 2007 compared to an
increase of $24.8 million for the thirteen week period ended April 29, 2006. Capital expenditures
related primarily to new store construction costs and the purchase of an airplane. The balance of
capital expenditures related primarily to miscellaneous store, home office and distribution center
projects.
Lessor construction allowances are an integral part of the decision-making process for assessing
the viability of new store leases. In making the decision whether to invest in a store location,
the Company calculates the estimated future return on its investment based on the cost of
construction, less any construction allowances to be received from the landlord. For the thirteen
week periods ended May 5, 2007 and April 29, 2006, the Company received $9.6 million and $6.7
million in construction allowances, respectively.
During Fiscal 2007, the Company anticipates capital expenditures between $395 million and $405
million. Approximately $220 million of this amount is allocated to new store construction and full
store remodels. Approximately $60 million is expected to be allocated to refresh existing stores.
The store refresh will include new floors, sound systems and fixture replacements at Abercrombie &
Fitch and abercrombie stores. In addition, the store refresh will include the addition of video
walls at existing Hollister stores and fixtures to stores throughout the Hollister chain.
Approximately $35 million was allocated to the acquisition of an airplane. The Company is planning
approximately $85 million in capital expenditures at the home office related to new office
buildings, information technology investment and new direct-to-consumer distribution and logistics
systems.
By the end of Fiscal 2007 the Company plans to increase gross square footage by approximately 11%
to 12% over Fiscal 2006. Management anticipates the net addition of approximately ten new
Abercrombie & Fitch stores, 29 new abercrombie stores, 69 new Hollister stores and nine RUEHL
stores. In January 2008, the Company plans to introduce its newest concept with the opening of
four stores.
During Fiscal 2007, the Company expects the average construction cost
per square foot, net of construction allowances, for new Hollister stores
to be approximately $140. The Company
expects the average construction cost per square foot, net of construction allowances, for new abercrombie stores to
be approximately $166. During Fiscal 2007, the Company expects average
construction cost per square foot, net of construction allowances, for new Abercrombie &
Fitch stores to be approximately $107. The Company expects the average construction cost
per square foot, net of construction allowances, for RUEHL stores to be
approximately $270, based on the current store format. The Company is developing a new store
prototype for RUEHL that may affect the average cost per square foot. The new prototype includes
smaller square footage on one level versus two and is expected to decrease the total construction
cost of the store.
The Company expects initial inventory purchases for the stores to average approximately $0.4 million, $0.2 million, $0.3 million and $0.5 million per store for Abercrombie & Fitch,
abercrombie, Hollister and RUEHL, respectively.
The Company expects that substantially all future capital expenditures will be funded with cash from operations and landlord construction allowances. In addition, the Company has $250 million
available (less outstanding letters of credit) under its Amended Credit Agreement to support operations.
25
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Companys discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are
based upon the Companys consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these
financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Since actual results may differ
from those estimates, the Company revises its estimates and assumptions as new information becomes
available.
The Companys significant accounting policies can be found in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (see Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in A&Fs Annual
Report on Form 10-K for Fiscal 2006 filed on March 30, 2007). The Company believes that the
following policies are the most critical to the portrayal of the Companys financial condition and
results of operations.
Revenue Recognition The Company recognizes retail sales at the time the customer takes
possession of the merchandise and purchases are paid for, primarily with either cash or credit
card. Direct-to-consumer sales are recorded upon customer receipt of merchandise. Amounts
relating to shipping and handling billed to customers in a sale transaction are classified as
revenue and the related direct shipping and handling costs are classified as stores and
distribution expense. Associate discounts are classified as a reduction of revenue. The Company
reserves for sales returns through estimates based on historical experience and various other
assumptions that management believes to be reasonable. The sales return reserve was $8.2 million,
$8.9 million and $7.6 million at May 5, 2007, February 3, 2007 and April 29, 2006, respectively.
The Companys gift cards do not expire or lose value over periods of inactivity. The Company
accounts for gift cards by recognizing a liability at the time a gift card is sold. The liability
remains on the Companys books until the earlier of redemption (recognized as revenue) or when the
Company determines the likelihood of redemption is remote (recognized as other operating income).
The Company determines the probability of the gift card being redeemed to be remote based on
historical redemption patterns and at these times recognizes the remaining balance as other
operating income. At May 5, 2007 and February 3, 2007, the gift card liability on the Companys
Consolidated Balance Sheet was $48.4 million and $65.0 million, respectively. The Company is not
required by law to escheat the value of unredeemed gift cards to the states in which it operates.
During the first quarter of Fiscal 2007 the Company recognized other operating income for
adjustments to the gift card liability of $2.8 million versus $0.9 million during the first quarter
of Fiscal 2006.
26
Inventory Valuation Inventories are principally valued at the lower of average cost or market
utilizing the retail method. The Company determines market value as the anticipated future selling
price of the merchandise less a normal margin. An initial markup is applied to inventory at cost
in order to establish a cost-to-retail ratio. Permanent markdowns, when taken, reduce both the
retail and cost components of inventory on hand so as to maintain the already established
cost-to-retail relationship. At first and third fiscal quarter end, the Company reduces inventory
value by recording a markdown reserve that represents the estimated future anticipated selling
price decreases necessary to sell-through the current season inventory. At second and fourth
fiscal quarter end, the Company reduces inventory value by recording a markdown reserve that
represents the estimated future selling price decreases necessary to sell-through any remaining
carryover inventory from the season just passed.
Additionally, as part of inventory valuation, an inventory shrink estimate is made each period that
reduces the value of inventory for lost or stolen items. The Company performs physical inventories
throughout the year and adjusts the shrink reserve accordingly.
Inherent in the retail method calculation are certain significant judgments and estimates
including, among others, markdowns and shrinkage, which could significantly impact the ending
inventory valuation at cost as well as the resulting gross margins. An increase or decrease in the
inventory shrink estimate of 10% would not have a material impact on the Companys results of
operations. Management believes this inventory valuation method is appropriate since it preserves
the cost-to-retail relationship in ending inventory.
Property and Equipment Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment are computed for
financial reporting purposes on a straight-line basis, using service lives ranging principally from
30 years for buildings, the lesser of ten years or the life of the lease for leasehold improvements
and three to ten years for other property and equipment. The cost of assets sold or retired and
the related accumulated depreciation or amortizations are removed from the accounts with any
resulting gain or loss included in net income. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as
incurred. Major remodels and improvements that extend service lives of the assets are capitalized.
Long-lived assets are reviewed at the store level periodically for impairment or whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that full recoverability of net assets through future cash
flows is in question. Factors used in the evaluation include, but are not limited to, managements
plans for future operations, recent operating results and projected cash flow.
Income Taxes Income taxes are calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes, which requires the use of the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized based on the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts
of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are measured using current enacted tax rates in effect for the years in which those
temporary differences are expected to reverse. Inherent in the measurement of deferred balances
are certain judgments and interpretations of enacted tax law and published guidance with respect to
applicability to the Companys operations. A valuation allowance was provided in the prior year
for losses related to the start-up costs associated with operations in foreign countries. No
changes have been made to this valuation allowance in the first quarter of Fiscal 2007. No other
valuation allowances have been provided for deferred tax assets because management believes that it
is more likely than not that the full amount of the net deferred tax assets will be realized in the
future. The effective tax rate utilized by the Company reflects managements judgment of the
expected tax liabilities within the various taxing jurisdictions.
27
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48
(FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes An Interpretation of FASB Statement No.
109. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a Companys
financial statements in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes. This interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and
measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position
taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This interpretation also provides guidance on
derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure
and transition. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax
benefits as a component of tax expense.
The provision for income taxes is based on the current estimate of the annual effective tax rate
adjusted to reflect the tax impact of items discrete to the quarter. The Company records tax
expense or benefit that does not relate to ordinary income in the current fiscal year discretely in
the period in which it occurs pursuant to the requirements of APB
Opinion No. 28, Interim
Financial Reporting and Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation 18, Accounting
for Income Taxes in Interim Periods an Interpretation of APB Opinion No. 28. Examples of such
types of discrete items include, but are not limited to, changes in estimates of the outcome of tax
matters related to prior years, provision-to-return adjustments, tax-exempt income and the
settlement of tax audits.
Foreign Currency Translation Some of the Companys international operations use local currencies
as the functional currency. In accordance with SFAS No. 52, Foreign Currency Translation, assets
and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies were translated into U.S. dollars (the reporting
currency) at the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date.
Equity accounts denominated in foreign currencies were translated
into U.S. dollars at historical exchange rates. Revenues and expenses
denominated in foreign currencies were translated into U.S. dollars at the monthly average exchange
rate for the period. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in
the results of operations, whereas related translation adjustments
and intercompany loans of a long-term investment nature are reported as an element of
other comprehensive income in accordance with SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income.
Contingencies In the normal course of business, the Company must make continuing estimates of
potential future legal obligations and liabilities, which requires the use of managements judgment
on the outcome of various issues. Management may also use outside legal advice to assist in the
estimating process. However, the ultimate outcome of various legal issues could be different than
management estimates, and adjustments may be required. The Company accrues for its legal
obligations for outstanding bills, expected defense costs and, if appropriate, settlements.
Accruals are made for personnel, general litigation and intellectual property cases.
Equity Compensation Expense The Companys equity compensation expense related to stock options
is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of the stock
option grants, which requires the Company to estimate the expected term of the stock option grants
and expected future stock price volatility over the term. The term represents the expected period
of time the Company believes the options will be outstanding based on historical information.
Estimates of expected future stock price volatility are based on the historic volatility of the
Companys stock for the period equal to the expected term of the stock option. The Company
calculates the historic volatility as the annualized standard deviation of the differences in the
natural logarithms of the weekly stock closing price, adjusted for stock splits.
28
The fair value calculation under the Black-Scholes valuation model is particularly sensitive to
changes in the term and volatility assumptions. Increases in term or volatility will result in a
higher fair valuation of stock option grants. Assuming all other assumptions disclosed in Note 2
of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Share Based Compensation, being equal, a
10% increase in term will yield a 5% increase in the Black-Scholes valuation, while a 10% increase
in volatility will yield a 7% increase in the Black-Scholes valuation. The Company believes that
changes in term and volatility would not have a material effect on the Companys results since the
number of stock options granted during the periods presented was not material.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB released FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No.
157). SFAS No. 157 establishes a common definition for fair value under GAAP and also establishes
a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure requirements about such fair value
measurements. SFAS No. 157 will be effective for the Company on February 3, 2008. The Company is
currently evaluating the potential impact on the consolidated financial statements of adopting SFAS
No. 157.
In February 2007, the FASB released FASB Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159 permits companies to measure many
financial instruments and certain other assets and liabilities at fair value on an instrument by
instrument basis. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements to
facilitate comparisons between companies that select different measurement attributes for similar
types of assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 159 will be effective for the Company on February 3,
2008. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact on the consolidated financial
statements of adopting SFAS No. 159.
29
Safe Harbor Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
The Company cautions that any forward-looking statements (as such term is defined in the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995) contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or made
by the Company, its management or spokespeople involve risks and uncertainties and are subject to
change based on various factors, many of which may be beyond its control. Words such as
estimate, project, plan, believe, expect, anticipate, intend, and similar expressions
may identify forward-looking statements.
The following factors, in addition to those included in the disclosure under the heading
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND RISK FACTORS in ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS of A&Fs Annual Report on
Form 10-K for Fiscal 2006 filed on March 30, 2007, in some cases have affected and in the future
could affect the Companys financial performance and could cause actual results for Fiscal 2007 and
beyond to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any of the forward-looking
statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or otherwise made by management:
|
|
|
changes in consumer spending patterns and consumer preferences; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of competition and pricing pressures; |
|
|
|
|
disruptive weather conditions affecting consumers ability to shop; |
|
|
|
|
unseasonal weather conditions affecting consumer preferences; |
|
|
|
|
availability and market prices of key raw materials; |
|
|
|
|
ability of manufacturers to comply with applicable laws,
regulations and ethical business practices; |
|
|
|
|
currency and exchange risks and changes in existing or
potential duties, tariffs or quotas; |
|
|
|
|
availability of suitable store locations on appropriate
terms; |
|
|
|
|
ability to develop innovative, high-quality new
merchandise in response to changing fashion trends; |
|
|
|
|
loss of services of skilled senior executive officers; |
|
|
|
|
ability to hire, train and retain qualified associates; and |
|
|
|
|
the effects of political and economic events and
conditions domestically and in foreign jurisdictions in which the
Company operates, including, but not limited to, acts of terrorism or
war. |
Future economic and industry trends that could potentially impact revenue and profitability are
difficult to predict. Therefore, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements
included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q will prove to be accurate. In light of the
significant uncertainties in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such
information should not be regarded as a representation by the Company, or any other person, that
the objectives of the Company will be achieved. The forward-looking statements herein are based on
information presently available to the management of the Company. Except as may be required by
applicable law, the Company assumes no obligation to publicly update or revise its forward-looking
statements even if experience or future changes make it clear that any projected results expressed
or implied therein will not be realized.
30
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
The Company maintains its cash equivalents in financial instruments with original maturities of 90
days or less. The Company also holds investments in marketable securities, which consist primarily
of investment grade municipal notes and bonds and investment grade auction rate securities, all
classified as available-for-sale with maturities ranging from three months to forty years. These
securities are consistent with the investment objectives contained within the investment policy
established by the Companys Board of Directors. The basic objectives of the investment policy are
the preservation of capital, maintaining sufficient liquidity to meet operating requirements and
maximizing net after-tax yield.
Investments in municipal notes and bonds have early redemption provisions at predetermined prices.
Taking these provisions into account, none of these investments extend beyond five years. The
Company believes that a significant increase in interest rates could result in a material loss if
the Company sells the investment prior to the early redemption provision. For the thirteen week
period ended May 5, 2007, there were no realized gains or losses. Net unrealized holding losses
were approximately $0.7 million as of May 5, 2007.
Despite the underlying long-term maturity of auction rate securities, from the investors
perspective, such securities are priced and subsequently traded as short-term investments because
of the interest rate reset feature. Interest rates are reset through an auction process at
predetermined periods ranging from seven to 49 days. Failed auctions rarely occur. As of May 5,
2007, the Company held approximately $268.1 million in available-for-sale securities classified as
marketable securities.
The Company established an irrevocable rabbi trust (the Rabbi Trust) during the third quarter of
Fiscal 2006, the purpose of which is to be a source of funds to match respective funding
obligations to participants in the Abercrombie & Fitch Nonqualified Savings and Supplemental
Retirement Plan and the Chief Executive Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. As of May
5, 2007, total assets related to the Rabbi Trust were $34.2 million, which included $18.5 million
held in money market accounts and $15.7 million related to the cash surrender value of trust owned
life insurance policies. The Rabbi Trust assets are consolidated in accordance with Emerging
Issues Task Force 97-14 and recorded at fair value in other assets on the Consolidated Balance
Sheet and are restricted as to their use as noted above.
The Company does not enter into financial instruments for trading purposes.
As of May 5, 2007 the Company had no long-term debt outstanding. Future borrowings would bear
interest at negotiated rates and would be subject to interest rate risk.
The Company has exposure to adverse changes in exchange rates associated with revenues and
operating expenses of foreign operations, which are denominated in Euros, Canadian Dollars and
British Pounds, but believes this exposure is immaterial to the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
The Companys market risk profile as of May 5, 2007 has not significantly changed since February 3,
2007.
31
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) that are
designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports
that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and
forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management,
including the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required financial
disclosures. Because of inherent limitations, disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how
well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the
objectives of disclosure controls and procedures are met.
The Companys management, including the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys design and
operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the fiscal quarter ended May
5, 2007. Based upon that evaluation, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures were effective at a reasonable level of assurance as of the end of the period covered by
this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in A&Fs internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule
13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during A&Fs fiscal quarter ended May 5, 2007 that
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, A&Fs internal control over
financial reporting.
32
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
A&F is a defendant in lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business.
On June 23, 2006, Lisa Hashimoto, et al. v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Abercrombie & Fitch Stores,
Inc., was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles. In
that action, three plaintiffs allege, on behalf of a putative class of California store managers
employed in Hollister and abercrombie stores, that they were entitled to receive overtime pay as
non-exempt employees under California wage and hour laws. The complaint seeks injunctive relief,
equitable relief, unpaid overtime compensation, unpaid benefits, penalties, interest and attorneys
fees and costs. The defendants filed an answer to the complaint on August 21, 2006. The parties
are engaging in discovery.
On September 2, 2005, a purported class action, styled Robert Ross v. Abercrombie & Fitch Company,
et al., was filed against A&F and certain of its officers in the United States District Court for
the Southern District of Ohio on behalf of a purported class of all persons who purchased or
acquired shares of A&Fs Common Stock between June 2, 2005 and August 16, 2005. In September and
October of 2005, five other purported class actions were subsequently filed against A&F and other
defendants in the same Court. All six securities cases allege claims under the federal securities
laws, and seek unspecified monetary damages, as a result of a decline in the price of A&Fs Common
Stock during the summer of 2005. On November 1, 2005, a motion to consolidate all of these
purported class actions into the first-filed case was filed by some of the plaintiffs. A&F joined
in that motion. On March 22, 2006, the motions to consolidate were granted, and these actions
(together with the federal court derivative cases described in the following paragraph) were
consolidated for purposes of motion practice, discovery and pretrial proceedings. A consolidated
amended securities class action complaint was filed on August 14, 2006. On October 13, 2006, all
defendants moved to dismiss that complaint. The motion has been fully briefed and is pending.
On September 16, 2005, a derivative action, styled The Booth Family Trust v. Michael S. Jeffries,
et al., was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, naming A&F
as a nominal defendant and seeking to assert claims for unspecified damages against nine of A&Fs
present and former directors, alleging various breaches of the directors fiduciary duty and
seeking equitable and monetary relief. In the following three months (October, November and
December of 2005), four similar derivative actions were filed (three in the United States District
Court for the Southern District of Ohio and one in the Court of Common Pleas for Franklin County,
Ohio) against present and former directors of A&F alleging various breaches of the directors
fiduciary duty and seeking equitable and monetary relief. A&F is also a nominal defendant in each
of the four later derivative actions. On November 4, 2005, a motion to consolidate all of the
federal court derivative actions with the purported securities law class actions described in the
preceding paragraph was filed. On March 22, 2006, the motion to consolidate was granted, and the
federal court derivative actions have been consolidated with the aforesaid purported securities law
class actions for purposes of motion practice, discovery and pretrial proceedings. A consolidated
amended derivative complaint was filed in the federal proceeding on July 10, 2006. A&F filed a
motion to stay the consolidated federal derivative case and that motion has been granted. The
state court action has also been stayed. On February 16, 2007, A&F announced its Board of
Directors received a report of its Special Litigation Committee established by the Board to
investigate and act with respect to
claims asserted in certain previously disclosed derivative lawsuits brought against current and
former directors and management, including Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Michael S.
Jeffries. The Special Litigation Committee has concluded that there is no evidence to support the
asserted claims and directed the Company to seek dismissal of the derivative actions. A&F has
advised both the federal and state courts in which the derivative actions are pending, that it
believes the derivative cases should be stayed until the pending motion to dismiss the related
consolidated securities cases has been finally decided, as described in the preceding paragraph.
33
In December 2005, the Company received a formal order of investigation from the SEC concerning
trading in shares of A&Fs Common Stock. The SEC has requested information from A&F and certain of
its current and former officers and directors. The Company and its personnel are cooperating fully
with the SEC.
Management intends to defend the aforesaid matters vigorously, as appropriate. Management is
unable to assess the potential exposure of the aforesaid matters. However, managements assessment
of the Companys current exposure could change in the event of the discovery of additional facts
with respect to legal matters pending against the Company or determinations by judges, juries or
other finders of fact that are not in accord with managements evaluation of the claims.
34
The Companys risk factors as of May 5, 2007 have not changed materially from those disclosed in
A&Fs Annual Report on Form 10-K for Fiscal 2006 filed on March 30, 2007.
35
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
The following table provides information regarding A&Fs purchase of its Common Stock during the
thirteen week period ended May 5, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Maximum Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
Shares that May Yet |
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Average Price Paid |
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
be Purchased under |
|
Period |
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
Announced Program |
|
|
the Program(1) |
|
February 4 through
March 3, 2007 |
|
|
1,010,000 |
|
|
$ |
78.24 |
|
|
|
1,010,000 |
|
|
|
4,673,500 |
|
March 4 through
April 7, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,673,500 |
|
April 8 through
May 5, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,673,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,010,000 |
|
|
$ |
78.24 |
|
|
|
1,010,000 |
|
|
|
4,673,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The number shown represents, as of the end of each period, the maximum number of
shares of Common Stock that may yet be purchased under A&Fs publicly announced stock purchase
authorizations. The shares may be purchased from time to time, depending on market
conditions. |
36
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of A&F as filed with the Delaware Secretary
of State on August 27, 1996, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to A&Fs
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 2, 1996 (File No.
001-12107). |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Certificate of Designation of Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock of A&F as
filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on July 21, 1998, incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 3.2 to A&Fs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal year ended January 30, 1999
(File No. 001-12107). |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of Decrease of Shares Designated as Class B Common Stock as filed with the
Delaware Secretary of State on July 30, 1999, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.3
to A&Fs Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 31, 1999 (File No.
001-12107). |
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of A&F (reflecting amendments through May 20, 2004), incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 3.7 to A&Fs Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended May 1, 2004 (File No. 001-12107). |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of July 16, 1998, between A&F and First Chicago Trust Company of
New York, as Rights Agent, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1 to A&Fs Registration
Statement on Form 8-A dated and filed July 21, 1998 (File No. 001-12107). |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement, dated as of April 21, 1999, between A&F and First
Chicago Trust Company of New York, as Rights Agent, incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 2 to A&Fs Amendment No. 1 to Form 8-A dated April 23, 1999 and filed April 26, 1999
(File No. 001-12107). |
37
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Certificate of adjustment of number of Rights associated with each share of Class A Common
Stock, dated May 27, 1999, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to A&Fs Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 31, 1999 (File No. 001-12107). |
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Appointment and Acceptance of Successor Rights Agent, effective as of the opening of business
on October 8, 2001, between A&F and National City Bank, incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.6 to A&Fs Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 4,
2001 (File No. 001-12107). |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of November 14, 2002, as amended and restated as of December 15,
2004, among Abercrombie & Fitch Management Co., A&F, the Lenders party thereto, National City
Bank, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and National City Bank and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.,
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to A&Fs Current Report on Form 8-K dated and
filed December 21, 2004 (File No. 001-12107). |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Guarantee Agreement, dated as of November 14, 2002, as amended and restated as of December
15, 2004, among A&F, each direct and indirect domestic subsidiary of A&F other than
Abercrombie & Fitch Management Co., and National City Bank, incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 4.2 to A&Fs Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed December 21, 2004 (File No.
001-12107). |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
First Amendment dated as of June 22, 2005, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of November 14,
2002, as amended and restated as of December 15, 2004, among Abercrombie & Fitch Management
Co., A&F, the Lenders party thereto, and National City Bank, incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 4.1 to A&Fs Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed June 22, 2005 (File No.
001-12107). |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement (Nonstatutory Stock Option) for Associates under the
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan on or after March 6, 2006, incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to A&Fs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal year
ended January 28, 2006 (File 001-12107). |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Associates under the Abercrombie & Fitch
Co. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan on or after March 6, 2006, incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.34 to A&Fs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal year ended January 28,
2006 (File No. 001-12107). |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Form of Restricted Shares Award Agreement under the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 2002 Stock Plan
for Associates on or after March 6, 2006, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to
A&Fs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal year ended January 28, 2006 (File No.
001-12107). |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement (Nonstatutory Stock Options) under the Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
2002 Stock Plan for Associates on or after March 6, 2006, incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.36 to A&Fs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal year ended January 28, 2006
(File No. 001-12107). |
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Separation Agreement executed by A&F and John Lough, dated as of August 1, 2006 incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to A&Fs Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed August
7, 2006 (File No. 001-12107). |
38
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Separation Agreement executed by A&F and Thomas Mendenhall, dated as of October 16, 2006
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to A&Fs Current Report on Form 8-K dated and
filed October 16, 2006 (File No. 001-12107). |
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Trust Agreement, dated as of October 16, 2006, among A&F and Wilmington Trust Company,
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to A&Fs Current Report on Form 8-K dated and
filed October 17, 2006 (File No. 001-12107). |
|
|
|
15
|
|
Letter re: Unaudited Interim Financial Information to Securities and Exchange Commission re: |
|
|
Inclusion of Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.* |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification by Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.* |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification by Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.* |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
39
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO.
|
|
Date: June 12, 2007 |
By |
/s/ MICHAEL W. KRAMER
|
|
|
|
Michael W. Kramer |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Authorized Officer) |
|
40
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
Letter re: Unaudited Interim Financial Information to Securities and Exchange
Commission re: Inclusion of Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification by Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification by Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
41