UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
¨ | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 1-7170
Aleris International, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
75-2008280
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
25825 Science Park Drive, Suite 400
Beachwood, Ohio 44122
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(216) 910-3400
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of accelerated filer, large accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer x Smaller reporting company ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
As of November 12, 2008, there were 900 shares of the registrants common stock outstanding.
INDEX
Page No. | ||||
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | 3 | |||
ITEM 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 3 | |||
ITEM 2 MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | 24 | |||
ITEM 3 QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK | 40 | |||
ITEM 4 CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES | 43 | |||
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION | 44 | |||
ITEM 1A RISK FACTORS | 44 | |||
ITEM 6 EXHIBITS | 45 | |||
SIGNATURES | 46 | |||
EXHIBIT INDEX | 47 | |||
EX-10.1 | ||||
EX-10.2 | ||||
EX-31.1 | ||||
EX-31.2 | ||||
EX-32 |
2
ALERIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(in millions, except share and per share data)
September 30, 2008 |
December 31, 2007 |
|||||||
ASSETS |
(Unaudited | ) | ||||||
Current Assets |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 83.7 | $ | 109.9 | ||||
Accounts receivable (net of allowances of $19.1 and $17.4 at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007) |
766.4 | 668.0 | ||||||
Inventories |
801.7 | 839.7 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
135.7 | 41.6 | ||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
20.9 | 30.6 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
102.3 | 40.6 | ||||||
Assets of discontinued operations - current |
- | 254.1 | ||||||
Total Current Assets |
1,910.7 | 1,984.5 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
1,324.3 | 1,423.5 | ||||||
Goodwill |
1,216.5 | 1,219.1 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
297.5 | 329.9 | ||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
40.6 | 56.4 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
10.8 | 10.8 | ||||||
Other assets |
51.2 | 49.1 | ||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 4,851.6 | $ | 5,073.3 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current Liabilities |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 618.2 | $ | 687.4 | ||||
Accrued liabilities |
297.2 | 192.9 | ||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
75.0 | 33.1 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
25.2 | 25.2 | ||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
21.0 | 20.6 | ||||||
Liabilities of discontinued operations - current |
- | 67.5 | ||||||
Total Current Liabilities |
1,036.6 | 1,026.7 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
2,684.3 | 2,696.5 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
186.4 | 177.3 | ||||||
Accrued pension benefits |
151.9 | 155.8 | ||||||
Accrued postretirement benefits |
50.0 | 52.5 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
124.4 | 113.8 | ||||||
Stockholders Equity |
||||||||
Preferred stock; par value $.01; 100 shares authorized; none issued |
- | - | ||||||
Common stock; par value $.01; 900 shares authorized and issued |
- | - | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
855.0 | 852.6 | ||||||
Retained deficit |
(325.8 | ) | (129.0 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
88.8 | 127.1 | ||||||
Total Stockholders Equity |
618.0 | 850.7 | ||||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
$ | 4,851.6 | $ | 5,073.3 | ||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
ALERIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(in millions)
For the three months ended September 30 |
For the nine months ended September 30 |
|||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 1,583.1 | $ | 1,531.3 | $ | 4,857.8 | $ | 4,455.9 | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
1,525.5 | 1,435.8 | 4,579.7 | 4,180.0 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
57.6 | 95.5 | 278.1 | 275.9 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
82.3 | 84.4 | 238.0 | 212.7 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring and other charges |
61.3 | 2.0 | 75.1 | 10.9 | ||||||||||||
Losses (gains) on derivative financial instruments |
143.0 | (1.7 | ) | 82.6 | (30.9 | ) | ||||||||||
Operating (loss) income |
(229.0 | ) | 10.8 | (117.6 | ) | 83.2 | ||||||||||
Interest expense |
58.2 | 51.0 | 171.9 | 151.4 | ||||||||||||
Interest income |
(0.2 | ) | (0.7 | ) | (1.6 | ) | (1.9 | ) | ||||||||
Other (income) expense, net |
(4.1 | ) | 3.6 | (8.3 | ) | 3.8 | ||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations before provision for income taxes and minority interests |
(282.9 | ) | (43.1 | ) | (279.6 | ) | (70.1 | ) | ||||||||
Benefit from income taxes |
(86.3 | ) | (45.6 | ) | (83.2 | ) | (51.2 | ) | ||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations before minority interests |
(196.6 | ) | 2.5 | (196.4 | ) | (18.9 | ) | |||||||||
Minority interests, net of provision for income taxes |
- | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
(196.6 | ) | 2.3 | (196.9 | ) | (19.5 | ) | |||||||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
(1.2 | ) | 1.2 | 2.4 | 4.8 | |||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (197.8 | ) | $ | 3.5 | $ | (194.5 | ) | $ | (14.7 | ) | |||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
ALERIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in millions)
For the nine months ended September 30 |
||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Operating activities |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (194.5 | ) | $ | (14.7 | ) | ||
Less: Income from discontinued operations |
2.4 | 4.8 | ||||||
Loss from continuing operations |
(196.9 | ) | (19.5 | ) | ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
173.2 | 148.3 | ||||||
Benefit from deferred income taxes |
(91.8 | ) | (50.3 | ) | ||||
Restructuring, inventory impairment and other charges: |
||||||||
Charges |
88.4 | 10.9 | ||||||
Payments |
(25.6 | ) | (11.7 | ) | ||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
1.8 | 2.9 | ||||||
Unrealized losses (gains) on derivative financial instruments |
74.1 | (17.4 | ) | |||||
Charges related to fair value of inventory in purchase accounting |
0.3 | 46.2 | ||||||
Other non-cash charges |
11.6 | 10.4 | ||||||
Change in operating assets and liabilities |
(181.4 | ) | 29.4 | |||||
Net cash (used) provided by operating activities of continuing operations |
(146.3 | ) | 149.2 | |||||
Investing activities |
||||||||
Acquisition of Aleris International, Inc. |
- | (11.5 | ) | |||||
Sale of Zinc Business |
278.0 | - | ||||||
Purchase of businesses, net of cash acquired |
(19.9 | ) | (314.7 | ) | ||||
Payments for property, plant and equipment |
(107.6 | ) | (126.5 | ) | ||||
Other |
1.3 | (0.3 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities of continuing operations |
151.8 | (453.0 | ) | |||||
Financing activities |
||||||||
Net proceeds from (payments on) long-term revolving credit facilities |
15.8 | 155.9 | ||||||
Payments on long-term debt |
(14.5 | ) | (6.2 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from long-term debt |
- | 100.0 | ||||||
Other |
(7.8 | ) | (4.1 | ) | ||||
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities of continuing operations |
(6.5 | ) | 245.6 | |||||
Effect of exchange rate differences on cash and cash equivalents |
(1.5 | ) | 4.0 | |||||
Cash flows used by continuing operations |
(2.5 | ) | (54.2 | ) | ||||
Cash flows of discontinued operations: |
||||||||
Operating cash flows |
(23.7 | ) | 61.6 | |||||
Investing cash flows |
- | (9.0 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
109.9 | 126.1 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 83.7 | $ | 124.5 | ||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
ALERIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
(amounts in millions, except share data)
A. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (U.S. GAAP) for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2008. The accompanying financial statements include the accounts of Aleris International, Inc. and all of its subsidiaries (collectively, except where the context otherwise requires, referred to as we, us, our or similar terms). All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. On January 11, 2008, we sold all the outstanding shares of capital stock of each of U.S. Zinc Corporation, Interamerican Zinc, Inc., and Aleris Asia Pacific Zinc (Barbados) Ltd. together with their wholly owned subsidiaries (the Zinc Business). As a result, the Zinc Business has been reported as a discontinued operation. This is more fully described in Note D. Unless otherwise indicated, amounts in the notes to the consolidated financial statements refer to continuing operations. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts to conform to the current year presentation.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157 establishes a common definition for fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 was effective for financial assets and financial liabilities for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Issued in February 2008, FASB Staff Position (FSP) 157-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13 removed leasing transactions accounted for under Statement 13 and related guidance from the scope of SFAS No. 157. FSP 157-2, Partial Deferral of the Effective Date of Statement 157, deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. FSP 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active, clarifies the determination of fair value in a market that is not active and provides an example that illustrates key considerations when applying the principles in SFAS No. 157 to financial assets when the market for those assets is not active.
The implementation of SFAS No. 157 for financial assets and financial liabilities, effective January 1, 2008, has not had a material impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations. The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). SFAS No. 157 classifies the inputs used to measure fair value into the following hierarchy:
Level 1 - | inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. | |
Level 2 - | inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. | |
Level 3 - | inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair market measurement. |
SFAS No. 157 also nullifies the guidance in Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 02-3, which required the deferral of profit at inception of a transaction involving derivative financial instruments in the absence of observable data supporting the valuation technique and requires consideration of credit-worthiness when valuing liabilities.
6
The Company endeavors to utilize the best available information in measuring fair value. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The following table sets forth the Companys financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2008 and the level in the fair value hierarchy:
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using: | |||||||||||||||
Description |
Total carrying value in the Consolidated Balance Sheet |
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |||||||||||
Derivative assets |
$ | 61.5 | $ | - | $ | 61.5 | $ | - | |||||||
Derivative liabilities |
(103.0 | ) | (4.3 | ) | (98.7 | ) | - | ||||||||
Net derivative (liabilities) assets |
$ | (41.5 | ) | $ | (4.3 | ) | $ | (37.2 | ) | $ | - | ||||
Derivative contracts are valued using quoted market prices and significant other observable and unobservable inputs. Such financial instruments consist of purchase and sales contracts for aluminum as well as certain alloys used in our production processes, interest rate swaps, natural gas collars, and foreign currency contracts. The fair values for the majority of these derivative contracts are based upon current quoted market prices. These financial instruments are typically exchange-traded and are generally classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether the exchange is deemed to be an active market or not.
Where appropriate, valuations are adjusted for various factors such as liquidity, bid/offer spreads, and credit considerations. Such adjustments are generally based on available market evidence (Level 2).
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value and report unrealized gains and losses on these instruments in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company did not adopt the optional provisions of this statement.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations. This statement provides greater consistency in the accounting and financial reporting of business combinations. It requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction, establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed, requires certain restructuring and all acquisition related costs to be expensed as incurred, and requires the acquirer to disclose the nature and financial effect of the business combination. SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of the statement will not have an impact on previously completed acquisitions; however, upon adoption, the Company will expense all acquisition costs incurred prior to December 31, 2008 for all acquisitions not consummated prior to that date. At September 30, 2008, the Company had approximately $0.5 of costs related to pending acquisitions included within Other current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements. This statement amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company has not yet determined the impact of adoption on its results of operations or financial position.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activitiesan amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures about an entitys derivative and hedging activities, including (i) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (ii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and its related interpretations and (iii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. As SFAS No. 161 only requires enhanced disclosures, this statement will have no impact on the results of operations or financial position of the Company.
7
B. ACQUISITIONS
2008 Acquisitions
We completed the acquisitions of certain assets of A.E., Inc (A.E.) and H.T. Aluminum Specialties, Inc. (H.T.) in the first quarter of 2008 for an aggregate cash purchase price of $19.9, including acquisition related expenses. The purchase price allocations associated with these acquisitions are preliminary. The final determination of required purchase accounting adjustments will be made upon the determination of the fair value of certain acquired assets and liabilities and the completion of integration plans. The results of operations of the acquired businesses are included in the results of operations of the Global Rolled and Extruded Products and Global Recycling reportable segments, respectively, since the dates of acquisition. Pro forma information has not been presented for these acquisitions as the impact to the consolidated financial statements is not material.
2007 Acquisitions
In September 2007, we acquired Wabash Alloys (Wabash) for a cash purchase price of $164.3, including acquisition related expenses of $4.4. Wabash produces aluminum casting alloys and molten metal at its facilities in the United States, Canada and Mexico. The purchase price paid was funded through additional indebtedness as discussed in Note F. The acquisition of Wabash, which is included within our Global Recycling segment, has broadened our customer base and optimized processing capabilities within our specification alloy operations.
The consolidated financial statements include the results of Wabash from the date of acquisition. As a part of the integration of the Wabash facilities, we consolidated the operations of our Monterrey, Mexico, Dickson and Shelbyville, Tennessee, and Guelph, Ontario facilities. The purchase price paid has been allocated based on the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The purchase price allocation is final. The resulting goodwill is deductible for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
The following table presents the final allocation of the purchase price related to the Wabash acquisition:
Current assets |
$ | 137.5 | ||
Property plant and equipment |
84.1 | |||
Goodwill |
50.4 | |||
Intangible assets |
18.1 | |||
Current liabilities |
(104.2 | ) | ||
Long-term liabilities |
(21.6 | ) | ||
Cash paid |
164.3 | |||
Less: cash acquired |
(5.6 | ) | ||
Cash paid, net of cash acquired |
$ | 158.7 | ||
We also completed the acquisitions of EKCO Products and Alumox Holding AS in 2007 for an aggregate cash purchase price of $50.8, including acquisition related expenses. The purchase price allocation associated with the EKCO Products and Alumox Holding AS acquisitions are final. The results of operations of the acquired businesses are included in the results of operations of the Global Rolled and Extruded Products and Global Recycling reportable segments, respectively, since the dates of acquisition.
C. RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER CHARGES
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded restructuring and other charges totaling approximately $61.3 and $75.1, respectively, of which approximately $34.3 and $40.1 were non-cash related and approximately $27.0 and $35.0 were cash related. The charges primarily resulted from the following activities:
On July 12, 2008, we announced that the permanent closure of the Global Rolled and Extruded Products segments Cap de la Madeleine, Quebec aluminum rolling mill facility would occur following an orderly shut down of all remaining activities at the facility because of the permanent and irreparable damage suffered by the operations as a result of labor issues. We had been engaged in negotiations and discussions regarding a new collective bargaining agreement for many months with representatives of the union representing production and maintenance workers at the facility. The union failed to ratify a new agreement during these negotiations and ultimately rejected our final proposal for a new collective bargaining agreement twice in July 2008. Substantially all production at this facility ceased in September 2008.
8
We recorded charges of $53.7 related to the closure within Restructuring and other charges as well as $13.3 within Cost of sales in the Consolidated Statement of Operations during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008. These charges consisted of the following:
¡ | Asset impairment charges of approximately $29.1 relating to property, plant and equipment. We based the determination of the impairments of these assets on the undiscounted cash flows expected to be realized from the affected assets and recorded the related assets at fair value, as determined by an independent third party appraisal; |
¡ | Employee severance, health care continuation, and outplacement costs of $3.3 associated with approximately 90 hourly and salaried employees. The majority of all affected personnel have left their positions as of September 30, 2008; |
¡ | Curtailment charges relating to defined benefit pension and other postemployment benefit plans of $12.8 covering the affected employees. Settlement of these plans will result in an additional estimated charge of approximately $4.0 and is expected to occur in 2009 or 2010; |
¡ | Other closure related charges of $8.5 related primarily to derivative and other contract terminations and costs associated with environmental remediation efforts required as a result of the closure; and |
¡ | In addition to these charges, all of which are included within Restructuring and other charges, we recorded inventory impairment charges and excess production costs attributable to the closure of $13.3 which have been included within Cost of sales in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. |
In addition to the charges described above, we will continue to incur severance, security, utility and other costs related to the closed facility. These costs, estimated at $6.5, will be recognized as incurred. Total costs expected to be incurred as a result of the closure are estimated to be approximately $73.5.
We recorded $1.1 and $7.3 of cash restructuring charges and $0.2 and $0.6 of non-cash asset impairment charges during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, primarily related to the shutdown of our Toronto, Canada and Bedford, Ohio coil coating facilities within the Global Rolled and Extruded Products segment. Production at these facilities has been transferred to other facilities and all of the affected employees have left their positions as of September 30, 2008. We also temporarily idled the majority of production at our Richmond, Virginia rolling mill and closed our ALSCO divisional headquarters in Raleigh, North Carolina. We based the determination of the impairments of the assets on the undiscounted cash flows expected to be realized from the affected assets and recorded the related assets at fair value. Cash restructuring costs included the costs to move assets to other facilities, severance costs and contract cancellation costs. We also recorded a non-cash asset impairment charge of $1.2 during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 at our Koblenz, Germany facility.
We recorded $1.5 and $2.6 of cash restructuring charges and $4.7 and $8.9 of non-cash asset impairment charges during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, primarily related to the shutdown of our operations in Shelbyville, Rockwood and Dickson, Tennessee, as well as Bedford, Indiana and Guelph, Ontario, all of which were within our Global Recycling segment. Production at these facilities has been transferred to other facilities and all of the affected employees have left their positions as of September 30, 2008. We based the determination of the impairments of the assets on the undiscounted cash flows expected to be realized from the affected assets and recorded the related assets at fair value. Cash restructuring costs included the costs to move assets to other facilities, severance costs and contract cancellation costs. In addition to the $6.3 of charges incurred in connection with the Shelbyville shutdown in the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we expect to incur $1.2 of additional utility and other costs related to the closure. Future expenditures related to the closure of the other facilities mentioned are not expected to be material.
9
The following table presents the activity and the reserve balances related to these restructuring programs for the nine months ended September 30, 2008:
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 |
Employee severance and benefit costs |
Asset impairments |
Exit costs | Total | ||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
$ | 16.7 | $ | - | $ | 3.0 | $ | 19.7 | ||||||||
Charges recorded in the statement of operations |
22.6 | 40.1 | 12.4 | 75.1 | ||||||||||||
Amounts recorded in purchase accounting |
(1.2 | ) | - | 1.0 | (0.2 | ) | ||||||||||
Cash payments |
(15.8 | ) | - | (8.5 | ) | (24.3 | ) | |||||||||
Non-cash charges |
- | (40.1 | ) | - | (40.1 | ) | ||||||||||
Translation and other adjustments |
0.2 | - | 0.4 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2008 |
$ | 22.5 | $ | - | $ | 8.3 | $ | 30.8 | ||||||||
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, we incurred restructuring and other charges of $2.0 and $10.9, respectively, primarily related to a potential acquisition that was not consummated and start-up costs associated with our European headquarters.
D. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On January 11, 2008, we sold our Zinc Business for total cash consideration of $287.2. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we revised our estimate of the working capital adjustment and recorded a loss of $1.2. Final determination of the working capital delivered occurred in the fourth quarter of 2008 and no further adjustments to the net gain are anticipated. We provided information technology, accounting and treasury services for a transitional period of approximately nine months, but we have had no other significant continuing involvement in the operations of the Zinc Business subsequent to the closing of the sale. In addition, we have not realized any continuing cash flows from the Zinc Business subsequent to the closing of the sale.
In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the Zinc Business qualifies as a discontinued operation. Accordingly, the results of operations of the Zinc Business have been reclassified and included in (Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax, within the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the eleven days ended January 11, 2008 and the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007. The assets and liabilities of the Zinc Business have also been reclassified and included within the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2007. The applicable interest expense for the eleven days ended January 11, 2008 and the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 has been allocated based on the ratio of net assets for the Zinc Business compared to total net assets of the U.S. entities as the debt held outside the U.S. is not directly attributable to the Zinc Business. The interest expense included in discontinued operations totaled $0.4 for the eleven days ended January 11, 2008 and $4.7 and $14.0 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively.
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $(1.2) and $2.4, respectively. In addition to the results of operations for the eleven days ended January 11, 2008, the results of discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 include amounts related to the revision of the purchase price adjustment associated with the working capital delivered as well as adjustments to the estimated income tax expense associated with the sale. (Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $1.2 and $4.8, respectively.
E. INVENTORIES
The components of inventories are:
September 30, 2008 | December 31, 2007 | |||||
Finished goods |
$ | 268.3 | $ | 269.5 | ||
Raw materials |
261.3 | 296.2 | ||||
Work in process |
229.8 | 232.9 | ||||
Supplies |
42.3 | 41.1 | ||||
Total |
$ | 801.7 | $ | 839.7 | ||
10
F. LONG-TERM DEBT
Our long-term debt is summarized as follows:
September 30, 2008 | December 31, 2007 | |||||
Revolving Credit Facility | $ | 386.9 | $ | 375.8 | ||
Term Loan Facility, net of discount of $20.5 and $23.4 at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively | 1,209.1 | 1,231.2 | ||||
9% Senior Notes, due December 15, 2014, net of discount of $9.3 and $10.4 at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively | 588.7 | 589.6 | ||||
9% New Senior Notes, due December 15, 2014, net of discount of $7.1 and $8.1 at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively | 98.3 | 97.4 | ||||
10% Senior Subordinated Notes, due December 15, 2016, net of discount of $9.6 and $10.5 at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively | 389.4 | 389.5 | ||||
Other | 32.9 | 33.6 | ||||
Subtotal | 2,705.3 | 2,717.1 | ||||
Less current maturities | 21.0 | 20.6 | ||||
Total | $ | 2,684.3 | $ | 2,696.5 | ||
Revolving Credit Facility
On August 1, 2006, we entered into our $750.0 million revolving credit facility, which we amended and restated on December 19, 2006 in conjunction with our acquisition by the Texas Pacific Group (the TPG Acquisition) through which we became a wholly owned subsidiary of Aurora Acquisition Holdings, Inc. (Holdings). On August 23, 2007, we entered into an incremental commitment agreement, which increased the facility size by $100.0 million to $850.0 million, subject to applicable borrowing bases. On September 10, 2008, we amended our revolving credit facility to, in part, increase the maximum borrowings by $244.0 and increase the maximum amount provided for the issuance of letters of credit by $25.0. Our revolving credit facility, as amended, provides senior secured financing of up to $1,094.0 (the Revolving Credit Facility). We incurred $5.7 of fees and expenses associated with the September 10, 2008 amendment, which will be charged to interest expense over the remaining term of the Revolving Credit Facility.
We and certain of our U.S. and international subsidiaries are borrowers under this Revolving Credit Facility. The availability of funds to the borrowers located in each jurisdiction is subject to a borrowing base for that jurisdiction, calculated on the basis of a predetermined percentage of the value of selected accounts receivable and U.S. and Canadian inventory, less certain ineligible amounts. Non-U.S. borrowers also have the ability to borrow under this Revolving Credit Facility based on excess availability under the borrowing base applicable to U.S. borrowers, subject to certain sublimits. The Revolving Credit Facility provides for the issuance of up to $75.0 of letters of credit as well as borrowings on same-day notice, referred to as swingline loans, and are available in U.S. dollars, Canadian dollars, euros and certain other currencies. As of September 30, 2008, we estimate that our borrowing base would have supported borrowings of $716.0. After giving effect to the $386.9 of outstanding borrowings as well as outstanding letters of credit of $36.2, we had $292.9 available for borrowing as of September 30, 2008.
The weighted average interest rate under the Revolving Credit Facility as of September 30, 2008 was 5.94%.
There is no scheduled amortization under the Revolving Credit Facility. The principal amount outstanding will be due and payable in full at maturity, on December 19, 2011.
Term Loan Facility
On August 1, 2006, we entered into our term loan facility providing for borrowings of $399.0 and 195.6, which we amended and restated on December 19, 2006 in conjunction with the TPG Acquisition to increase the maximum borrowings to $825.0 and 303.0 and which we further amended on March 16, 2007 to change certain pricing terms (the Term Loan Facility). Our Term Loan Facility is a seven-year credit facility maturing on December 19, 2013. The Term Loan Facility permits $825.0 in U.S. dollar borrowings and 303.0 in euro borrowings. In March 2007, we entered into an interest rate swap to fix the base interest rate paid on a portion of the amount outstanding under the Term Loan Facility. In March 2008, we further reduced our exposure to interest rate fluctuations by entering into an additional interest rate swap to fix the interest we will pay on an incremental portion of our Term Loan Facility. As a result of these swaps, interest on approximately $750.0 of Term Loan Facility debt is fixed as of September 30, 2008. Under the terms of the swap agreements, we will receive interest based upon LIBOR and pay base rates of 4.93% and 3.45%. Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps are included within Accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The swaps mature in March 2010 and March 2012, respectively.
11
At September 30, 2008, the weighted average interest rate for borrowings under the Term Loan Facility was 5.74%, exclusive of the impact of the interest rate swaps.
Senior Notes
On December 19, 2006, in connection with the TPG Acquisition, Aurora Acquisition Merger Sub, Inc. (Merger Sub) issued $600.0 aggregate original principal amount of 9% Senior Notes (Senior Notes) under a senior indenture (the Senior Indenture) with LaSalle Bank National Association, as trustee. As the surviving corporation in the merger of Merger Sub with and into Aleris through which we became a wholly owned subsidiary of Holdings, we assumed all the obligations of Merger Sub under the Senior Indenture. The Senior Notes mature on December 15, 2014. In the first quarter of 2008, we retired $2.0 of our Senior Notes for $1.6, resulting in a gain on retirement of $0.4, net of debt issuance costs written off, which is included in Other (income) expense, net in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
For any interest payment period through December 15, 2010, we may, at our option, elect to pay interest on the Senior Notes entirely in cash (Cash Interest), entirely by increasing the principal amount of the outstanding Senior Notes or by issuing additional Senior Notes (PIK Interest), or by paying 50% of the interest on the Senior Notes in Cash Interest and the remaining portion of such interest in PIK Interest. Cash Interest on the Senior Notes accrues at the rate of 9% per annum. PIK Interest on the Senior Notes accrues at the rate of 9.75% per annum. After December 15, 2010, we will make all interest payments on the Senior Notes entirely in cash. All Senior Notes mature on December 15, 2014 and have the same rights and benefits as the Senior Notes issued on December 19, 2006. Interest on the Senior Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on each June 15 and December 15, and commenced on June 15, 2007. We intend to pay interest on the Senior Notes with PIK Interest for the interest payment due June 15, 2009.
New Senior Notes
On September 11, 2007, we issued $105.4 aggregate original principal amount of 9% New Senior Notes (New Senior Notes) under a senior indenture with LaSalle Bank National Association, as trustee. Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. purchased the New Senior Notes with an original issue discount at 94.87%, less an initial purchasers fee and commitment fee. The New Senior Notes mature on December 15, 2014. Interest on the New Senior Notes is payable in cash semi-annually in arrears on each June 15 and December 15, and commenced on December 15, 2007.
Senior Subordinated Notes
On December 19, 2006, in connection with the TPG Acquisition, Merger Sub issued $400.0 aggregate original principal amount of 10% Senior Subordinated Notes (Senior Subordinated Notes) under a senior subordinated indenture (the Senior Subordinated Indenture) with LaSalle Bank National Association, as trustee. As the surviving corporation in the merger of Merger Sub with and into Aleris through which we became a wholly owned subsidiary of Holdings, we assumed all the obligations of Merger Sub under the Senior Subordinated Indenture. The Senior Subordinated Notes mature on December 15, 2016. Interest on the Senior Subordinated Notes is payable in cash semi-annually in arrears on each June 15 and December 15, and commenced on June 15, 2007. In the first quarter of 2008, we retired $1.0 of our Senior Subordinated Notes for $0.7 resulting in a gain from retirement of $0.3, net of debt issuance costs written off, which is included in Other (income) expense, net in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
G. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Environmental Proceedings and Asset Retirement Obligations
Our operations are subject to environmental laws and regulations, which govern, among other things, air emissions, wastewater discharges, the handling, storage, and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, the remediation of contaminated sites, and employee health and safety. Future environmental regulations could impose stricter compliance requirements on the industries in which we operate. Additional equipment or process changes at some of our facilities may be needed to meet future requirements.
We have been named as a potentially responsible party in certain proceedings initiated pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (Superfund) and similar state statutes and may be named a potentially responsible party in other similar proceedings in the future. It is not anticipated that the costs incurred in connection with the presently pending
12
proceedings will, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. Currently and from time to time, we are a party to notices of violation brought by environmental agencies concerning the laws governing air emissions. In connection with certain pending proceedings, we are engaged in discussions with the United States Department of Justice, the United States Environmental Protection Agency and several states for the purpose of resolving in one proceeding similar issues that have arisen at a number of our facilities in different states. Although discussions are ongoing with respect to the amount of penalties and the scope of injunctive relief, the government has recently demanded that we pay a combined civil penalty of $7.2 as part of a consent decree resolving these issues. We do not anticipate that the ultimate amount of penalties combined with the cost of any injunctive relief would have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.
We are performing operations and maintenance at two Superfund sites for matters arising out of past waste disposal activity associated with closed facilities. We are also under orders or directives to perform environmental remediation by agencies in five states and two non-U.S. countries at eight sites, five of which are located at our operating facilities.
Our aggregate accrual for environmental matters was $47.9 and $45.4 as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. Of the environmental liabilities recorded at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, $6.7 and $7.3 was indemnified by Corus Group plc, respectively. Although the outcome of any such matters, to the extent they exceed any applicable accrual, could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations or cash flows for the applicable period, we currently believe that any such outcome would not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
The processing of scrap generates solid waste in the form of saltcake and baghouse dust. This material is disposed of at off-site landfills or at permitted landfills at our Morgantown, Kentucky and Wabash, Indiana facilities. If saltcake were ever classified as a hazardous waste in the United States, the costs to manage and dispose of it would increase, which could result in significant increased expenditures.
In addition to environmental liabilities, we have recorded asset retirement obligations associated with legal requirements related primarily to the normal operation of our landfills and the retirement of the related assets. At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, our total asset retirement obligations for our landfills were $16.7 and $16.7, respectively.
Legal Proceedings
We are a party from time to time to what we believe are routine litigation and proceedings considered part of the ordinary course of our business. We believe that the outcome of such existing proceedings would not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
H. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The following table presents the components of comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
For the three months ended September 30 |
For the nine months ended September 30 |
|||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (197.8 | ) | $ | 3.5 | $ | (194.5 | ) | $ | (14.7 | ) | |||||
Changes in other comprehensive income, net of tax: |
||||||||||||||||
Currency translation adjustments |
(132.5 | ) | 32.2 | (38.6 | ) | 53.9 | ||||||||||
Pension liability adjustment |
(4.7 | ) | - | (4.7 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Unrealized (losses) gains on derivative financial instruments: |
||||||||||||||||
Net change from periodic revaluations |
(1.1 | ) | (8.0 | ) | 8.0 | (7.7 | ) | |||||||||
Income tax effect |
0.4 | 3.1 | (3.0 | ) | 3.0 | |||||||||||
Net unrealized (losses) gains on derivative financial instruments |
(0.7 | ) | (4.9 | ) | 5.0 | (4.7 | ) | |||||||||
Comprehensive (loss) income |
$ | (335.7 | ) | $ | 30.8 | $ | (232.8 | ) | $ | 34.5 | ||||||
See Note M for further information relating to our derivative financial instruments.
13
I. SEGMENT REPORTING
Our reporting structure consists of global business units that offer different types of metal products and services. Our operating segments consist of Global Rolled and Extruded Products, Global Recycling and Global Specification Alloy.
Our Global Rolled and Extruded Products segment produces aluminum sheet, plate and extruded and fabricated products for distributors and customers serving the aerospace, building and construction, transportation and consumer durables industry segments. For financial reporting purposes, the Global Recycling and Global Specification Alloy operating segments have been aggregated into the Global Recycling reportable segment. The Global Recycling segment represents all of our aluminum melting, processing, alloying and salt cake recycling activities. We have aggregated these businesses because the products produced are substantially identical (except for minor differences in chemical composition), are delivered in the same manner (either molten or in bars), the raw materials used are very similar, the production processes and equipment used are identical and the long-term gross margins have been and are expected to remain similar.
As a result of recent management changes, we are currently re-evaluating our reporting structure. These changes may impact our future determination of our operating segments and reporting units. We expect to complete our re-evaluation during the fourth quarter and update our segment reporting, if necessary, in our audited financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2008. Our annual goodwill impairment testing, which will be performed in the fourth quarter, will be based upon our new reporting structure. This testing may result in the recognition of a non-cash impairment charge if the fair value of one or more of our reporting units is less than its carrying value.
Measurement of Segment Profit or Loss and Segment Assets
The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our measure of the profitability of our reportable segments is referred to as segment income. Segment income excludes provisions for income taxes, restructuring and other charges, interest, all unrealized and certain realized losses (gains) on derivative financial instruments, and corporate general and administrative costs, including depreciation of corporate assets. Intersegment sales and transfers are recorded at market value. Consolidated cash, long-term debt, net capitalized debt costs, deferred tax assets and assets located at our headquarters office are not allocated to the reportable segments. In our continued efforts to integrate acquired businesses and to standardize reporting across the global operating segments, we began reporting certain selling, general and administrative expenses previously included within the segments operating results as corporate selling, general and administrative expense in 2008 and have reclassified the corresponding prior years amounts to conform to this presentation.
Reportable Segment Information
The following table shows our segment assets as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007:
September 30, 2008 | December 31, 2007 | |||||
Assets |
||||||
Global rolled and extruded products |
$ | 3,368.9 | $ | 3,396.6 | ||
Global recycling |
1,162.7 | 1,158.6 | ||||
Assets of discontinued operations |
- | 254.1 | ||||
Unallocated assets |
320.0 | 264.0 | ||||
Total consolidated assets |
$ | 4,851.6 | $ | 5,073.3 | ||
14
The following table shows our revenues and segment income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
For the three months ended | For the nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, 2008 |
September 30, 2007 |
September 30, 2008 |
September 30, 2007 |
|||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Global rolled and extruded products |
$ | 1,027.8 | $ | 1,146.3 | $ | 3,128.9 | $ | 3,299.8 | ||||||||
Global recycling |
579.1 | 425.1 | 1,809.6 | 1,267.1 | ||||||||||||
Intersegment revenues |
(23.8 | ) | (40.1 | ) | (80.7 | ) | (111.0 | ) | ||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 1,583.1 | $ | 1,531.3 | $ | 4,857.8 | $ | 4,455.9 | ||||||||
Segment income: |
||||||||||||||||
Global rolled and extruded products |
$ | 6.9 | $ | 45.3 | $ | 61.8 | $ | 95.2 | ||||||||
Global recycling |
16.3 | 8.8 | 67.1 | 49.9 | ||||||||||||
Total segment income |
23.2 | 54.1 | 128.9 | 145.1 | ||||||||||||
Unallocated amounts: |
||||||||||||||||
Corporate general and administrative expenses |
(31.7 | ) | (26.1 | ) | (91.1 | ) | (75.0 | ) | ||||||||
Restructuring and other charges |
(61.3 | ) | (2.0 | ) | (75.1 | ) | (10.9 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense |
(58.2 | ) | (51.0 | ) | (171.9 | ) | (151.4 | ) | ||||||||
(Losses) gains on derivative financial instruments |
(150.0 | ) | (21.0 | ) | (72.5 | ) | 18.3 | |||||||||
Interest and other (income) expense, net |
(4.9 | ) | 2.9 | 2.1 | 3.8 | |||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations before provision for income taxes and minority interests | $ | (282.9 | ) | $ | (43.1 | ) | $ | (279.6 | ) | $ | (70.1 | ) | ||||
J. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
In February 2007 the Board of Directors of Holdings approved the Aurora Acquisition Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated Management Equity Incentive Plan (2007 Plan). Under the 2007 Plan, Holdings may grant up to 740,870 stock options. Holdings granted an additional 160,000 stock options in the second quarter of 2008 and an additional 17,700 stock options in the third quarter of 2008 to certain members of the Companys senior management and directors. As of September 30, 2008, there were 708,411 stock options outstanding. The options have a weighted average exercise price of $100.91 per share and a ten year life with 60% of the options vesting ratably over five years and 40% vesting upon the occurrence of a liquidity event, as defined under the terms of the 2007 Plan agreement, and the achievement of certain returns on TPGs investment. A portion of the time-based options will be paid out upon a liquidity event should the event occur prior to full vesting of these awards. While the time based portion of the options will be expensed over the requisite service period, the event-based awards will not be expensed until the occurrence of the liquidity event.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded $1.8 compensation expense associated with these options and $1.1 and $2.9 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. The weighted-average fair values of the time and event-based options were approximately $48.95 and $35.46 per option, respectively. At September 30, 2008, there was $14.7 of compensation expense that will be recognized over the next four years and $11.9 of compensation expense that will be recognized upon the occurrence of a liquidity event.
The Company used the Monte Carlo Simulation method to estimate the fair value of the stock options granted. Under this method, the estimate of fair value is affected by the assumptions, certain of which are highly complex and subjective. Expected equity volatility was determined based upon historical stock prices of our peer companies. The expected term of the event-based options granted was determined based upon a range of estimates regarding the timing of a liquidity event.
K. INCOME TAXES
Our effective tax rate was 30.5% and 29.8% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and 105.9% and 73.8% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 differed from the federal statutory rate applied to losses before income taxes primarily as a result of the mix of income, losses and tax rates between tax jurisdictions.
15
We have valuation allowances recorded to reduce certain deferred tax assets to amounts that are more likely than not to be realized. The remaining valuation allowances relate to our potential inability to utilize certain foreign net operating loss carry forwards and U.S. state net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. We intend to maintain these valuation allowances until sufficient positive evidence exists (such as cumulative positive earnings and estimated future taxable income) to support their reversal.
We adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxesan Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 on January 1, 2007. The effect of adoption was not material. As of the date of adoption and September 30, 2008, we had $2.2 and $13.3, respectively, of unrecognized tax benefits.
We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions within the Benefit from income taxes in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. As of September 30, 2008, we had approximately $0.3 of accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions.
The 2001 through 2007 tax years remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which we are subject. We do not anticipate any significant changes to our total unrecognized tax benefits through the end of the third quarter of 2009.
L. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
Components of the net periodic benefit expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:
U.S. pension benefits | European and Canadian pension benefits | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the three months ended September 30 |
For the nine months ended September 30 |
For the three months ended September 30 |
For the nine months ended September 30 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 0.5 | $ | 0.7 | $ | 1.4 | $ | 2.0 | $ | 0.9 | $ | 1.5 | $ | 3.6 | $ | 4.2 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest cost |
1.9 | 1.9 | 5.7 | 5.6 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 10.6 | 9.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of net gain |
- | - | - | - | (0.1 | ) | - | (0.3 | ) | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(2.4 | ) | (2.3 | ) | (7.1 | ) | (6.7 | ) | (1.9 | ) | (2.0 | ) | (6.2 | ) | (5.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Curtailment loss |
- | - | - | - | 13.8 | - | 13.8 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | - | $ | 0.3 | $ | - | $ | 0.9 | $ | 15.9 | $ | 2.6 | $ | 21.5 | $ | 7.6 | ||||||||||||||||
Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
The components of net postretirement benefit expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:
U.S. pension benefits | European and Canadian pension benefits | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the three months ended September 30 |
For the nine months ended September 30 |
For the three months ended September 30 |
For the nine months ended September 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 0.1 | $ | 0.2 | $ | 0.3 | $ | 0.7 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||||
Interest cost |
0.7 | 0.9 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 0.1 | - | 0.3 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of service cost |
(0.1 | ) | - | (0.3 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Curtailment gain |
- | - | - | - | (1.0 | ) | - | (1.0 | ) | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 0.7 | $ | 1.1 | $ | 2.2 | $ | 3.2 | $ | (0.9 | ) | $ | - | $ | (0.7 | ) | $ | - | ||||||||||
M. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
We enter into derivatives to hedge the cost of energy, the sale and purchase prices of certain aluminum products as well as certain alloys used in our production processes, and certain currency and interest rate exposures. Generally, although our derivatives contracts are under master netting arrangements with our counterparties, we do not offset amounts in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. Accordingly, the fair value gains (losses) of outstanding derivative contracts are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as Derivative financial instruments, and Other long-term liabilities. At September 30, 2008, we had paid approximately $37.6 of
16
deposits pertaining to margin calls on derivative instruments, which are included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The fair value of our derivative financial instruments and amounts deferred in Accumulated other comprehensive income as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are as follows:
September 30, 2008 | December 31, 2007 | |||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
Fair Value | Deferred gains, net of tax |
Fair Value | Deferred gains, net of tax |
||||||||||||
Natural gas |
$ | (26.0 | ) | $ | - | $ | (0.5 | ) | $ | - | ||||||
Metal |
(15.1 | ) | - | 28.3 | - | |||||||||||
Currency |
4.8 | - | 24.9 | - | ||||||||||||
Interest rate |
(5.2 | ) | (3.2 | ) | (13.2 | ) | (8.2 | ) |
Both realized and unrealized gains and losses on those derivative financial instruments that are not accounted for as hedges are included within Losses (gains) on derivative financial instruments in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Realized (gains) losses totaled the following in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
Realized (gains) losses on derivative financial instruments | ||||||||||||||||
For the three months ended | For the nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
September 30, 2008 | September 30, 2007 | September 30, 2008 | September 30, 2007 | ||||||||||||
Natural gas |
$ | 3.4 | $ | 3.7 | $ | - | $ | 1.8 | ||||||||
Metal |
7.7 | (24.3 | ) | 50.0 | (11.6 | ) | ||||||||||
Currency |
(19.4 | ) | (4.0 | ) | (41.5 | ) | (3.7 | ) |
Natural Gas Hedging
In order to manage our price exposure for natural gas purchases, we have fixed the future price of a portion of our natural gas requirements by entering into financial hedge agreements. Under these agreements, payments are made or received based on the differential between the monthly closing price on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) and the contractual hedge price. We do not treat these derivative financial instruments as hedges for accounting purposes. Accordingly, the changes in the fair value of the contracts are recorded in earnings as Losses (gains) on derivative financial instruments in the Consolidated Statement of Operations rather than being deferred in Accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In addition, we have cost escalators included in some of our long-term supply contracts with customers, which limit our exposure to natural gas price risk.
Metal Hedging
The selling prices of the majority of the Global Rolled and Extruded Products segments customer orders are established at the time of order entry or, for certain customers, under long-term contracts. As the related raw materials used to produce these orders are purchased several months or years after the selling prices are fixed, the Global Rolled and Extruded Products segment is subject to the risk of changes in the purchase price of the raw materials it purchases. In order to manage this transactional exposure, London Metal Exchange (LME) future or forward purchase contracts are entered into at the time the selling prices are fixed. In addition, from time to time, the Global Rolled and Extruded Products segment enters into future sales contracts to protect the fair value of a portion of its aluminum inventory against a potential decline in aluminum selling prices. During the third quarter, we adjusted our metal hedging strategy to preserve our liquidity position by unwinding certain inventory hedges. We do not treat these derivative financial instruments as hedges for accounting purposes. Accordingly, the changes in the fair value of the contracts are recorded in earnings as Losses (gains) on derivative financial instruments in the Consolidated Statement of Operations rather than being deferred in Accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The Global Recycling segment also enters into LME high-grade aluminum forward sales and purchase contracts to reduce the risk associated with changes in metal prices. These contracts are not accounted for as hedges and, as a result, the changes in fair value of the contracts are recorded within Losses (gains) on derivative financial instruments in the Consolidated Statement of Operations rather than being deferred in Accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
17
Currency Hedging
Certain of our purchases and sales are denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the entities entering into these agreements. We have entered into foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the impact of currency fluctuations associated with these transactions. As with aluminum derivatives, we do not account for currency derivatives as hedges and, as a result, the changes in their fair value are recorded within Losses (gains) on derivative financial instruments in the Consolidated Statement of Operations rather than being deferred in Accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Interest Rate Hedging
As discussed in Note F, during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, we entered into interest rate swaps to fix the interest rate on a portion of our variable rate borrowings under the Term Loan Facility. Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap are recorded within Accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
N. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
As discussed in Note J, we recorded $1.8 of compensation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and $1.1 and $2.9 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, associated with the stock option plan of Holdings, the beneficiaries of which are members of our senior management and our Board of Directors. In addition, we recorded $2.5 and $7.1 of management fees payable to affiliates of TPG during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and $2.3 and $6.8 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. The amounts recorded in the third quarter of 2008 have been included within Accrued liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
O. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Certain of our subsidiaries (the Guarantor Subsidiaries) are guarantors of the indebtedness under our Senior Notes, New Senior Notes and Senior Subordinated Notes. Condensed consolidating financial statements of Aleris International, Inc., the Guarantor Subsidiaries, and those subsidiaries of Aleris International, Inc. that are not guaranteeing the indebtedness under the Senior Notes, the New Senior Notes and the Senior Subordinated Notes (the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries) are presented below. The condensed consolidating balance sheets are presented as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 and the condensed consolidating statements of operations are presented for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 and the condensed consolidating statements of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
18
As of September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||
Aleris International, Inc. |
Combined guarantor subsidiaries |
Combined non-guarantor subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||
Current Assets |
||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 0.4 | $ | 12.6 | $ | 70.7 | $ | - | $ | 83.7 | ||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
10.4 | 293.5 | 462.5 | - | 766.4 | |||||||||||||
Inventories |
4.9 | 299.4 | 497.4 | - | 801.7 | |||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
120.4 | - | 15.3 | - | 135.7 | |||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
- | 3.2 | 17.7 | - | 20.9 | |||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
70.2 | 10.6 | 21.5 | - | 102.3 | |||||||||||||
Total Current Assets |
206.3 | 619.3 | 1,085.1 | - | 1,910.7 | |||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
37.0 | 328.9 | 958.4 | - | 1,324.3 | |||||||||||||
Goodwill |
137.2 | 634.6 | 444.7 | - | 1,216.5 | |||||||||||||
Intangible assets, net |
64.4 | 154.7 | 78.4 | - | 297.5 | |||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
6.1 | 0.1 | 34.4 | - | 40.6 | |||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
- | - | 10.8 | - | 10.8 | |||||||||||||
Other assets |
23.4 | 2.8 | 26.1 | - | 52.3 | |||||||||||||
Investments in subsidiaries/ intercompany receivables (payables), net |
2,573.7 | (230.0 | ) | 254.1 | (2,598.9 | ) | (1.1 | ) | ||||||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 3,048.1 | $ | 1,510.4 | $ | 2,892.0 | $ | (2,598.9 | ) | $ | 4,851.6 | |||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||||||||||||
Current Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 48.0 | $ | 196.0 | $ | 374.2 | $ | - | $ | 618.2 | ||||||||
Accrued liabilities |
95.2 | 54.6 | 147.4 | - | 297.2 | |||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
24.3 | 43.9 | 6.8 | - | 75.0 | |||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
- | - | 25.2 | - | 25.2 | |||||||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
8.3 | 0.6 | 12.1 | - | 21.0 | |||||||||||||
Total Current Liabilities |
175.8 | 295.1 | 565.7 | - | 1,036.6 | |||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
2,146.8 | 1.4 | 536.1 | - | 2,684.3 | |||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
89.4 | - | 97.0 | - | 186.4 | |||||||||||||
Accrued pension benefits |
- | 5.0 | 146.9 | - | 151.9 | |||||||||||||
Accrued post-retirement benefits |
- | 44.2 | 5.8 | - | 50.0 | |||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
18.1 | 44.9 | 60.8 | 0.6 | 124.4 | |||||||||||||
Stockholders Equity |
618.0 | 1,119.8 | 1,479.7 | (2,599.5 | ) | 618.0 | ||||||||||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
$ | 3,048.1 | $ | 1,510.4 | $ | 2,892.0 | $ | (2,598.9 | ) | $ | 4,851.6 | |||||||
19
As of December 31, 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||
Aleris International, Inc. |
Combined guarantor subsidiaries |
Combined non-guarantor subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
|||||||||||||||||||
Current Assets |
|||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 5.4 | $ | 16.7 | $ | 87.8 | $ | - | $ | 109.9 | |||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
10.0 | 227.0 | 431.0 | - | 668.0 | ||||||||||||||
Inventories |
4.4 | 288.8 | 546.5 | - | 839.7 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
36.9 | - | 4.7 | - | 41.6 | ||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
- | 4.9 | 25.7 | - | 30.6 | ||||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
4.8 | 12.5 | 23.3 | - | 40.6 | ||||||||||||||
Assets of discontinued operations - current |
- | 240.2 | 13.9 | - | 254.1 | ||||||||||||||
Total Current Assets |
61.5 | 790.1 | 1,132.9 | - | 1,984.5 | ||||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
41.8 | 343.4 | 1,038.3 | - | 1,423.5 | ||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
- | 749.3 | 469.8 | - | 1,219.1 | ||||||||||||||
Intangible assets, net |
67.6 | 176.7 | 85.6 | - | 329.9 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
- | - | 10.8 | - | 10.8 | ||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
- | 4.7 | 51.7 | - | 56.4 | ||||||||||||||
Other assets |
19.9 | 2.8 | 27.3 | - | 50.0 | ||||||||||||||
Investments in subsidiaries/intercompany receivables (payables), net |
2,940.1 | (702.8 | ) | (382.9 | ) | (1,855.3 | ) | (0.9 | ) | ||||||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 3,130.9 | $ | 1,364.2 | $ | 2,433.5 | $ | (1,855.3 | ) | $ | 5,073.3 | ||||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|||||||||||||||||||
Current Liabilities |
|||||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 19.2 | $ | 237.1 | $ | 431.1 | $ | - | $ | 687.4 | |||||||||
Accrued liabilities |
11.7 | 74.3 | 106.9 | - | 192.9 | ||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
10.9 | 10.2 | 12.0 | - | 33.1 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
- | - | 25.2 | - | 25.2 | ||||||||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
8.3 | 0.7 | 11.6 | - | 20.6 | ||||||||||||||
Liabilities of discontinued operations - current |
- | 66.0 | 1.5 | - | 67.5 | ||||||||||||||
Total Current Liabilities |
50.1 | 388.3 | 588.3 | - | 1,026.7 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
2,126.0 | 1.7 | 568.8 | - | 2,696.5 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
85.5 | - | 91.8 | - | 177.3 | ||||||||||||||
Accrued pension benefits |
- | 11.1 | 144.7 | - | 155.8 | ||||||||||||||
Accrued postretirement benefits |
- | 42.9 | 9.6 | - | 52.5 | ||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
18.6 | 30.3 | 64.9 | - | 113.8 | ||||||||||||||
Stockholders Equity |
850.7 | 889.9 | 965.4 | (1,855.3 | ) | 850.7 | |||||||||||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
$ | 3,130.9 | $ | 1,364.2 | $ | 2,433.5 | $ | (1,855.3 | ) | $ | 5,073.3 | ||||||||
20
For the three months ended September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Aleris International, Inc. |
Combined guarantor subsidiaries |
Combined non-guarantor subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 38.5 | $ | 693.8 | $ | 868.4 | $ | (17.6 | ) | $ | 1,583.1 | |||||||||
Cost of sales |
34.0 | 664.5 | 844.6 | (17.6 | ) | 1,525.5 | ||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
4.5 | 29.3 | 23.8 | - | 57.6 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
4.6 | 28.6 | 49.1 | - | 82.3 | |||||||||||||||
Restructuring and other charges |
1.3 | 4.7 | 55.3 | - | 61.3 | |||||||||||||||
Losses on derivative financial instruments |
10.9 | 33.1 | 98.9 | 0.1 | 143.0 | |||||||||||||||
Operating loss |
(12.3 | ) | (37.1 | ) | (179.5 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (229.0 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest expense |
10.8 | 44.5 | 15.7 | (12.8 | ) | 58.2 | ||||||||||||||
Other expense (income), net |
2.7 | (1.0 | ) | (18.8 | ) | 12.8 | (4.3 | ) | ||||||||||||
Equity in net loss (earnings) of affiliates |
156.3 | 118.4 | - | (274.7 | ) | - | ||||||||||||||
(Loss) income before income taxes |
(182.1 | ) | (199.0 | ) | (176.4 | ) | 274.6 | (282.9 | ) | |||||||||||
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes |
14.5 | (49.2 | ) | (51.6 | ) | - | (86.3 | ) | ||||||||||||
(Loss) income before minority interest |
(196.6 | ) | (149.8 | ) | (124.8 | ) | 274.6 | (196.6 | ) | |||||||||||
Minority interests, net of provision for income taxes |
- | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
(196.6 | ) | (149.8 | ) | (124.8 | ) | 274.6 | (196.6 | ) | |||||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations |
(1.2 | ) | - | - | - | (1.2 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (197.8 | ) | $ | (149.8 | ) | $ | (124.8 | ) | $ | 274.6 | $ | (197.8 | ) | ||||||
For the three months ended September 30, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Aleris International, Inc. |
Combined guarantor subsidiaries |
Combined non-guarantor subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 33.7 | $ | 654.3 | $ | 861.5 | $ | (18.2 | ) | $ | 1,531.3 | |||||||||
Cost of sales |
26.6 | 590.0 | 837.5 | (18.3 | ) | 1,435.8 | ||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
7.1 | 64.3 | 24.0 | 0.1 | 95.5 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
6.4 | 38.2 | 39.8 | - | 84.4 | |||||||||||||||
Restructuring and other charges |
- | 1.5 | 0.5 | - | 2.0 | |||||||||||||||
Losses (gains) on derivative financial instruments |
8.9 | (1.7 | ) | (9.2 | ) | 0.3 | (1.7 | ) | ||||||||||||
Operating (loss) income |
(8.2 | ) | 26.3 | (7.1 | ) | (0.2 | ) | 10.8 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
7.9 | 43.4 | 8.3 | (8.6 | ) | 51.0 | ||||||||||||||
Other (income) expense, net |
(2.3 | ) | 0.2 | (3.5 | ) | 8.5 | 2.9 | |||||||||||||
Equity in net loss (earnings) of affiliates |
21.3 | (4.0 | ) | - | (17.3 | ) | - | |||||||||||||
(Loss) income before income taxes |
(35.1 | ) | (13.3 | ) | (11.9 | ) | 17.2 | (43.1 | ) | |||||||||||
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes |
(38.6 | ) | 10.4 | (17.4 | ) | - | (45.6 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before minority interest |
3.5 | (23.7 | ) | 5.5 | 17.2 | 2.5 | ||||||||||||||
Minority interests, net of provision for income taxes |
- | - | 0.2 | - | 0.2 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
3.5 | (23.7 | ) | 5.3 | 17.2 | 2.3 | ||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
- | 2.1 | (0.9 | ) | - | 1.2 | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 3.5 | $ | (21.6 | ) | $ | 4.4 | $ | 17.2 | $ | 3.5 | |||||||||
21
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Aleris International, Inc. |
Combined guarantor subsidiaries |
Combined non-guarantor subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 116.8 | $ | 2,018.9 | $ | 2,767.2 | $ | (45.1 | ) | $ | 4,857.8 | |||||||||
Cost of sales |
101.5 | 1,886.8 | 2,636.5 | (45.1 | ) | 4,579.7 | ||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
15.3 | 132.1 | 130.7 | - | 278.1 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
14.1 | 88.2 | 135.7 | - | 238.0 | |||||||||||||||
Restructuring and other charges |
1.4 | 12.2 | 61.5 | - | 75.1 | |||||||||||||||
Losses on derivative financial instruments |
10.8 | 68.8 | 2.8 | 0.2 | 82.6 | |||||||||||||||
Operating loss |
(11.0 | ) | (37.1 | ) | (69.3 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (117.6 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest expense |
29.7 | 133.5 | 40.4 | (31.7 | ) | 171.9 | ||||||||||||||
Other (income) expense, net |
(3.3 | ) | (3.3 | ) | (34.9 | ) | 31.6 | (9.9 | ) | |||||||||||
Equity in net loss (earnings) of affiliates |
174.3 | 57.9 | - | (232.2 | ) | - | ||||||||||||||
(Loss) income before income taxes |
(211.7 | ) | (225.2 | ) | (74.8 | ) | 232.1 | (279.6 | ) | |||||||||||
Benefit from income taxes |
(12.2 | ) | (54.1 | ) | (16.9 | ) | - | (83.2 | ) | |||||||||||
(Loss) income before minority interest |
(199.5 | ) | (171.1 | ) | (57.9 | ) | 232.1 | (196.4 | ) | |||||||||||
Minority interests, net of provision for income taxes |
- | - | 0.5 | - | 0.5 | |||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
(199.5 | ) | (171.1 | ) | (58.4 | ) | 232.1 | (196.9 | ) | |||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
5.0 | - | (2.6 | ) | - | 2.4 | ||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (194.5 | ) | $ | (171.1 | ) | $ | (61.0 | ) | $ | 232.1 | $ | (194.5 | ) | ||||||
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Aleris International, Inc. |
Combined guarantor subsidiaries |
Combined non-guarantor subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 105.0 | $ | 1,888.4 | $ | 2,599.1 | $ | (136.6 | ) | $ | 4,455.9 | |||||||||
Cost of sales |
88.3 | 1,730.6 | 2,497.8 | (136.7 | ) | 4,180.0 | ||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
16.7 | 157.8 | 101.3 | 0.1 | 275.9 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
13.8 | 84.3 | 114.6 | - | 212.7 | |||||||||||||||
Restructuring and other charges |
- | 9.0 | 1.9 | - | 10.9 | |||||||||||||||
Losses (gains) on derivative financial instruments |
0.1 | (7.8 | ) | (23.5 | ) | 0.3 | (30.9 | ) | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
2.8 | 72.3 | 8.3 | (0.2 | ) | 83.2 | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
22.6 | 133.0 | 24.3 | (28.5 | ) | 151.4 | ||||||||||||||
Other (income) expense, net |
(2.5 | ) | (2.9 | ) | (21.1 | ) | 28.4 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||
Equity in net loss (earnings) of affiliates |
36.3 | (15.2 | ) | - | (21.1 | ) | - | |||||||||||||
(Loss) income before income taxes |
(53.6 | ) | (42.6 | ) | 5.1 | 21.0 | (70.1 | ) | ||||||||||||
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes |
(38.9 | ) | 0.6 | (12.9 | ) | - | (51.2 | ) | ||||||||||||
(Loss) income before minority interest |
(14.7 | ) | (43.2 | ) | 18.0 | 21.0 | (18.9 | ) | ||||||||||||
Minority interests, net of provision for income taxes |
- | - | 0.6 | - | 0.6 | |||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
(14.7 | ) | (43.2 | ) | 17.4 | 21.0 | (19.5 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
- | 6.2 | (1.4 | ) | - | 4.8 | ||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (14.7 | ) | $ | (37.0 | ) | $ | 16.0 | $ | 21.0 | $ | (14.7 | ) | |||||||
22
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Aleris International, Inc. |
Combined guarantor subsidiaries |
Combined non-guarantor subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||
Net cash (used) provided by operating activities |
$ | (86.1 | ) | $ | (143.7 | ) | $ | 83.5 | $ | - | $ | (146.3 | ) | ||||||
Investing activities |
|||||||||||||||||||
Sale of Zinc Business |
266.5 | - | 11.5 | - | 278.0 | ||||||||||||||
Purchase of businesses, net of cash acquired |
- | (18.5 | ) | (1.4 | ) | - | (19.9 | ) | |||||||||||
Payments for property, plant and equipment |
(2.1 | ) | (19.1 | ) | (86.4 | ) | - | (107.6 | ) | ||||||||||
Other |
(0.2 | ) | 0.5 | 1.0 | - | 1.3 | |||||||||||||
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities |
264.2 | (37.1 | ) | (75.3 | ) | - | 151.8 | ||||||||||||
Financing activities |
|||||||||||||||||||
Net proceeds from (payments on) long-term revolving credit facilities |
24.1 | - | (8.3 | ) | - | 15.8 | |||||||||||||
Payments on long-term debt |
(9.1 | ) | (0.4 | ) | (5.0 | ) | - | (14.5 | ) | ||||||||||
Net transfers with subsidiaries |
(195.8 | ) | 206.9 | (11.1 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||
Other |
(7.3 | ) | - | (0.5 | ) | - | (7.8 | ) | |||||||||||
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities |
(188.1 | ) | 206.5 | (24.9 | ) | - | (6.5 | ) | |||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate differences on cash and cash equivalents |
- | (0.9 | ) | (0.6 | ) | - | (1.5 | ) | |||||||||||
Cash flow (used) provided by continuing operations |
(10.0 | ) | 24.8 | (17.3 | ) | - | (2.5 | ) | |||||||||||
Cash flow of discontinued operations: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Operating cash flows |
5.0 | (28.9 | ) | 0.2 | - | (23.7 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
5.4 | 16.7 | 87.8 | - | 109.9 | ||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 0.4 | $ | 12.6 | $ | 70.7 | $ | - | $ | 83.7 | |||||||||
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||
Aleris International, Inc. |
Combined guarantor subsidiaries |
Combined non-guarantor subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | - | $ | 42.0 | $ | 107.2 | $ | - | $ | 149.2 | |||||||||
Investing activities |
|||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition of Aleris International, Inc. |
(11.5 | ) | - | - | - | (11.5 | ) | ||||||||||||
Purchase of businesses, net of cash acquired |
(171.6 | ) | (37.9 | ) | (105.2 | ) | - | (314.7 | ) | ||||||||||
Payments for property, plant and equipment |
(2.0 | ) | (21.8 | ) | (102.7 | ) | - | (126.5 | ) | ||||||||||
Other |
- | (0.4 | ) | 0.1 | - | (0.3 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net cash used by investing activities |
(185.1 | ) | (60.1 | ) | (207.8 | ) | - | (453.0 | ) | ||||||||||
Financing activities |
|||||||||||||||||||
Net proceeds from long-term revolving credit facilities |
129.4 | - | 26.5 | - | 155.9 | ||||||||||||||
Payments on long-term debt |
(4.1 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (2.0 | ) | - | (6.2 | ) | ||||||||||
Proceeds from long-term debt |
100.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | ||||||||||||||
Debt issuance costs |
(3.7 | ) | - | - | - | (3.7 | ) | ||||||||||||
Change in restricted cash |
- | 0.2 | - | - | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||
Other |
- | 0.7 | (1.3 | ) | - | (0.6 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net transfers with subsidiaries |
(35.9 | ) | (38.2 | ) | 74.1 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities |
185.7 | (37.4 | ) | 97.3 | - | 245.6 | |||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate differences on cash and cash equivalents |
- | - | 4.0 | - | 4.0 | ||||||||||||||
Cash flow provided (used) by continuing operations |
0.6 | (55.5 | ) | 0.7 | - | (54.2 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cash flow of discontinued operations: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Operating cash flows |
- | 64.1 | (2.5 | ) | - | 61.6 | |||||||||||||
Investing cash flows |
- | (1.9 | ) | (7.1 | ) | - | (9.0 | ) | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
3.4 | 9.8 | 112.9 | - | 126.1 | ||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 4.0 | $ | 16.5 | $ | 104.0 | $ | - | $ | 124.5 | |||||||||
23
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT ON FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
The following is a discussion of our financial condition and results of operations for the periods presented. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, as well as in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Our discussion of our financial condition and results of operations also include various forward-looking statements about our industry, the demand for our products and services, and our projected results. Statements contained in this Form 10-Q that are not historical in nature are considered to be forward-looking statements. They include statements regarding our expectations, hopes, beliefs, estimates, intentions or strategies regarding the future. The words believe, expect, anticipate, intend, estimate, will, look forward to and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q and elsewhere are based on certain assumptions that we consider reasonable.
The expectations set forth in this report regarding, among other things, achievement of anticipated cost savings and synergies; estimates of volumes, revenues, profitability and net income in future quarters; future prices and demand for our products; and estimated cash flows and sufficiency of cash flows to fund capital expenditures, reflect only our expectations regarding these matters. Actual results could differ materially from these expectations, depending on certain risk factors that generally affect our business such as:
¡ | Difficult conditions in the capital, credit, commodities, and automobile and housing markets and in the overall economy could materially adversely affect our financial position and results of operations, and we do not know if these conditions will improve in the near future. |
¡ | The cyclical nature of the metals industry, our end-use segments and our customers industries could limit our operating flexibility, which could negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations. |
¡ | If we fail to implement our business strategy, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. |
¡ | We may be unable to manage effectively our exposure to commodity price fluctuations, and our hedging activities may affect profitability in a changing metals price environment and subject our earnings to greater volatility from period-to-period. |
¡ | The value of our derivative financial instruments is susceptible to fluctuations in the prices of metal and natural gas as well as currency exchange rates. Adverse changes in these prices or rates could, at times, require the use of additional cash from operations or borrowings under the agreements governing our outstanding indebtedness. |
¡ | The amount available under our Revolving Credit Facility is subject to levels of inventory and accounts receivables, which are heavily influenced by the price of aluminum. |
¡ | The loss of certain members of our management may have an adverse effect on our operating results. |
¡ | We had substantial historical net losses prior to 2005, and had a net loss in 2007 and first nine months of 2008, and any continuation of net losses in the future may reduce our ability to raise needed capital. |
¡ | The Companys management has identified a material weakness in its internal controls over financial reporting at December 31, 2007. |
¡ | We may encounter increases in the cost of raw materials and energy, which could cause our cost of goods sold to increase thereby reducing operating results and limiting our operating flexibility. |
¡ | If we were to lose order volumes from any of our largest customers, our sales volumes and revenues could be reduced and our cash flows lessened. |
¡ | We do not have long-term contractual arrangements with a substantial number of our customers, and our sales volumes and revenues could be reduced if our customers switch their suppliers. |
¡ | We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flows to fund our capital expenditure requirements or to meet our debt service obligations. |
¡ | A portion of our revenue is derived from our international operations which exposes us to certain risks inherent in doing business abroad. |
24
¡ | Current environmental liabilities, as well as the cost of compliance with and liabilities under health and safety laws, could increase our operating costs, and negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations. |
¡ | We could experience labor disputes that could disrupt our business. |
¡ | Our substantial leverage and debt service obligations could adversely affect our financial condition and restrict our operating flexibility. |
¡ | Despite current indebtedness levels, we and our subsidiaries may still be able to incur substantially more debt. This could further exacerbate the risks associated with our substantial leverage. |
¡ | Covenant restrictions under our indebtedness may limit our ability to operate our business and, in such event, we may not have sufficient assets to pay amounts due under the Senior Notes, the New Senior Notes and the Senior Subordinated Notes. |
¡ | To service our indebtedness, we will require a significant amount of cash. Our ability to generate cash depends on many factors beyond our control, and any failure to meet our debt service obligations could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. |
¡ | The terms of our 2006 Credit Facilities and the indentures governing the notes may restrict our current and future operations, particularly our ability to respond to changes in our business or to take certain actions. |
¡ | If we fail to successfully integrate past or future acquisitions or address risks associated with divestitures, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. |
These factors and other risk factors previously disclosed by us are not necessarily all of the important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any of our forward-looking statements. Other unknown or unpredictable factors could also harm our results. Consequently, there can be no assurance that the actual results or developments anticipated by us will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the expected consequences to, or effects on, us. Given these uncertainties, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.
The forward-looking statements contained in this report are made only as of the date hereof. We do not undertake, and specifically decline any obligation, to update any forward-looking statements or to publicly announce the results of any revisions to any of such statements to reflect future events or developments.
25
OVERVIEW
We are a global leader in aluminum rolled products and extrusions, aluminum recycling and specification alloy production. We generate substantially all of our revenues from the manufacture and sale of these products. We are a wholly-owned subsidiary of Aurora Acquisitions Holdings, Inc., a company formed by TPG for the purpose of acquiring us.
On January 11, 2008, we sold our Zinc Business for $287.2 million, and accordingly, the businesses comprising the Global Zinc segment have been reported as discontinued operations and excluded from the information shown below.
Our reportable segments consist of Global Rolled and Extruded Products and Global Recycling. Segment performance is measured utilizing segment income which includes gross profits, segment specific realized gains and losses on derivative financial instruments, other expense (income) and segment specific selling, general and administrative expense. Corporate other expense (income), corporate general and administrative expenses, all unrealized and certain realized gains and losses on derivative financial instruments, restructuring and other charges, management fees to affiliates of TPG, interest expense, interest income, losses on the early extinguishment of debt and provisions for income taxes are not allocated to individual segments. In our efforts to integrate acquired businesses and to standardize reporting across the global operating segments, we began reporting certain selling, general and administrative expenses previously included within the segments operating results as corporate selling, general and administrative expense in the first quarter of 2008 and have reclassified the corresponding prior year amounts to conform to this presentation.
In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, we generated revenues of approximately $1.6 billion and $4.9 billion, respectively, and segment income of $23.2 million and $128.9 million, respectively, compared to revenues of approximately $1.5 billion and $4.5 billion and segment income of $54.1 million and $145.1 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. Our segment operating results were negatively impacted by the application of purchase accounting in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, during which we recorded $1.6 million and $46.2 million, respectively, of additional cost of goods sold resulting from the adjustment to record acquired inventory to fair value in connection with the TPG Acquisition. In addition, the valuation of intangible assets recorded in connection with the TPG Acquisition was completed in the third quarter of 2007, at which time a catch-up adjustment of $14.1 million of amortization expense was recorded. The application of purchase accounting rules have also prevented us from reflecting $4.9 million and $16.8 million of economic gains associated with settled derivative financial instruments in segment income in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and $15.1 million and $45.7 million in the comparable periods of 2007.
Our continued focus on achieving cost reductions from the implementation of companywide productivity initiatives and synergies from acquisitions led to the realization of cost reductions totaling approximately $28.0 million and $81.0 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008. However, the positive impact of these cost savings initiatives has been more than offset by the continued slowdown in the North American economy and more recently a slowing in the European economy. In addition, third quarter and year-to-date results have been negatively impacted by metal price lag. Metal price lag represents the timing difference between the cost of aluminum in our cost of sales and the price of aluminum flowing through revenues, net of the results of our hedging activities. We estimate that metal price lag reduced our earnings by $21.5 million and $32.6 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively. During the three months ended September 30, 2007, we estimate metal price lag increased our earnings by $5.9 million and reduced earnings by approximately $7.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The negative impact to 2008 results is due to the declining LME as well as an adjustment to our hedging strategy to preserve our liquidity position by unwinding certain hedges related to our base inventory levels. This exposed us to additional metal price lag as LME prices decreased during the quarter.
Further impacting our operating results was interest expense of $58.2 million and $171.9 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and $51.0 million and $151.4 million in the comparable periods of 2007. Interest expense in the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased as compared to the corresponding period in 2007 as average indebtedness levels increased, primarily in connection with the acquisitions of Wabash, EKCO Products and Alumox Holdings AS (the 2007 Acquisitions), and due to the unfavorable impact of changes in currency exchange rates.
26
The following table presents key financial and operating data on a consolidated basis for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
For the three months ended September 30 |
For the nine months ended September 30 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | Percent change |
2008 | 2007 | Percent change |
|||||||||||||||||
(in millions, except for percentages) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 1,583.1 | $ | 1,531.3 | 3 | % | $ | 4,857.8 | $ | 4,455.9 | 9 | % | ||||||||||
Cost of sales |
1,525.5 | 1,435.8 | 6 | 4,579.7 | 4,180.0 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
57.6 | 95.5 | (40 | ) | 278.1 | 275.9 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
Gross profit as a percentage of revenues |
3.6 | % | 6.2 | % | 5.7 | % | 6.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
82.3 | 84.4 | (2 | ) | 238.0 | 212.7 | 12 | |||||||||||||||
Restructuring and other charges |
61.3 | 2.0 | * | 75.1 | 10.9 | 589 | ||||||||||||||||
Losses (gains) on derivative financial instruments |
143.0 | (1.7 | ) | * | 82.6 | (30.9 | ) | * | ||||||||||||||
Operating (loss) income |
(229.0 | ) | 10.8 | * | (117.6 | ) | 83.2 | * | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
58.2 | 51.0 | 14 | 171.9 | 151.4 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
(0.2 | ) | (0.7 | ) | (71 | ) | (1.6 | ) | (1.9 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||||||||
Other (income) expense, net |
(4.1 | ) | 3.6 | * | (8.3 | ) | 3.8 | * | ||||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations before provision for income taxes and minority interests |
(282.9 | ) | (43.1 | ) | 556 | (279.6 | ) | (70.1 | ) | 299 | ||||||||||||
Benefit from income taxes |
(86.3 | ) | (45.6 | ) | 89 | (83.2 | ) | (51.2 | ) | 63 | ||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations before minority interests |
(196.6 | ) | 2.5 | * | (196.4 | ) | (18.9 | ) | 939 | |||||||||||||
Minority interests, net of provision for income taxes |
- | 0.2 | (100 | ) | 0.5 | 0.6 | (17 | ) | ||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
$ | (196.6 | ) | $ | 2.3 | * | % | $ | (196.9 | ) | $ | (19.5 | ) | 910 | % | |||||||
Total segment income |
$ | 23.2 | $ | 54.1 | $ | 128.9 | $ | 145.1 | ||||||||||||||
Unallocated amounts: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate general and administrative expenses |
(31.7 | ) | (26.1 | ) | (91.1 | ) | (75.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Restructuring and other charges |
(61.3 | ) | (2.0 | ) | (75.1 | ) | (10.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(58.2 | ) | (51.0 | ) | (171.9 | ) | (151.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||
(Losses) gains on derivative financial instruments |
(150.0 | ) | (21.0 | ) | (72.5 | ) | 18.3 | |||||||||||||||
Interest and other (expense) income, net |
(4.9 | ) | 2.9 | 2.1 | 3.8 | |||||||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations before provision for income taxes and minority interests | $ | (282.9 | ) | $ | (43.1 | ) | $ | (279.6 | ) | $ | (70.1 | ) | ||||||||||
* Results not meaningful
27
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 COMPARED TO THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
Revenues
The following tables show revenues and shipments by segment and the percentage changes from the prior year period:
For the three months ended September 30 | Percent change |
||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
(in millions, except for percentages) | |||||||||||||
Revenues: |
|||||||||||||
Global Rolled and Extruded Products |
$ | 1,027.8 | $ | 1,146.3 | (10 | )% | |||||||
Global Recycling |
579.1 | 425.1 | 36 | ||||||||||
Intersegment revenues |
(23.8 | ) | (40.1 | ) | (41 | ) | |||||||
Consolidated revenues |
$ | 1,583.1 | $ | 1,531.3 | 3 | % | |||||||
Pounds shipped: |
|||||||||||||
Global Rolled and Extruded Products |
501.9 | 563.3 | (11 | )% | |||||||||
Global Recycling |
841.5 | 790.9 | 6 | ||||||||||
Total pounds shipped |
1,343.4 | 1,354.2 | (1 | )% | |||||||||
Consolidated revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased $51.8 million as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007. The 2007 Acquisitions and the acquisition of certain assets of A.E. and H.T. in the first quarter of 2008 accounted for an incremental $172.0 million of consolidated revenues. Global Rolled and Extruded Products revenues decreased $118.5 million in the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007 as shipment levels decreased 11% from the prior years third quarter. Excluding the impact of the 2007 Acquisitions and the acquisition of H.T., Global Recycling revenues decreased $18.0 million in the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the prior year period primarily due to lower shipment levels.
Global Rolled and Extruded Products Revenues
Global Rolled and Extruded Products revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2008 decreased $118.5 million compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007. This decrease was primarily due to the following:
¡ | A decrease in shipment levels in the third quarter of 2008 as compared to the third quarter of 2007 of approximately 11.0% resulting in decreased revenues of approximately $144.0 million. The reduction in shipments is a result of the continued reduction in demand from the North American housing segment and most other industry segments served by our North American operations as well as reductions associated with softening demand in Europe. |
This decrease was partially offset by the following:
¡ | Changes in currency exchange rates, which increased revenues by approximately $50.0 million; and |
¡ | Slightly higher rolling margins in Europe due to improved product mix. |
28
Global Recycling Revenues
Global Recycling revenues increased $154.0 million in the three months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007. This increase was primarily due to the following:
¡ | The revenues associated with the 2007 Acquisitions and the acquisition of H.T., which combined to contribute incremental revenues of $172.0 million in the third quarter of 2008; and |
¡ | Favorable changes in currency exchange rates, which increased revenues by approximately $10.0 million. |
These increases were partially offset by the following:
¡ | Shipment levels decreased by approximately 12.0% resulting in a decrease in revenues of approximately $19.0 million, excluding the impact of the 2007 Acquisitions and the acquisition of H.T., in the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the prior year period. The decrease in shipment levels was principally due to lower demand from our U.S. and European automotive customers; and |
¡ | A decrease in the average price of aluminum passed along to our customers in the third quarter of 2008 as compared to the prior year period resulting in a decrease in revenues of approximately $8.0 million. |
Segment Income and Gross Profit
For the three months ended September 30 | |||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | Percent change |
|||||||||||
(in millions, except percentages) | |||||||||||||
Segment income: |
|||||||||||||
Global Rolled and Extruded Products |
$ | 6.9 | $ | 45.3 | (85 | )% | |||||||
Global Recycling |
16.3 | 8.8 | 85 | ||||||||||
Total segment income |
23.2 | 54.1 | (57 | )% | |||||||||
Items not included in gross profit: |
|||||||||||||
Segment selling, general and administrative expense |
50.6 | 58.3 | (13 | )% | |||||||||
Realized gains on derivative financial instruments |
(7.0 | ) | (22.7 | ) | (69 | ) | |||||||
Other (income) expense, net |
(9.2 | ) | 5.8 | * | |||||||||
Gross profit |
$ | 57.6 | $ | 95.5 | (40 | )% | |||||||
* | Results not meaningful |
Global Rolled and Extruded Products Segment Income
Global Rolled and Extruded Products segment income for the three months ended September 30, 2008 decreased by $38.4 million compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007. This decrease was primarily due to the following:
¡ | Lower volumes during the third quarter of 2008 compared to the prior year period, which decreased segment income by approximately $36.0 million; |
¡ | Material margins were reduced by metal price lag and tighter scrap spreads in North America, which decreased segment income by an estimated $38.0 million; |
¡ | Inventory impairment charges and excess production costs relating to the permanent closure of our Cap de la Madeleine, Quebec facility which decreased segment income by $13.3 million; and |
¡ | Higher hardener, freight, energy and personnel costs, which reduced segment income by approximately $9.0 million. |
29
These decreases were partially offset by the following:
¡ | The impact of movements of currency exchange rates, which resulted in an increase in segment income of approximately $24.0 million; |
¡ | Gross productivity savings, which positively impacted segment income by an estimated $19.0 million in the third quarter of 2008; |
¡ | The lessening impact of the application of purchase accounting rules preventing the recognition of economic benefits related to acquired aluminum, currency and natural gas derivatives that settled during the third quarter of 2008 and 2007. Segment income was lower by $5.8 million and $15.7 million in the third quarter of 2008 and 2007, respectively, as a result of these rules; and |
¡ | Lower amortization expense associated with purchase accounting, which increased segment income by approximately $9.0 million. |
Global Recycling Segment Income
Global Recycling segment income in the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $7.5 million compared to the prior year period due primarily to approximately $16.0 million of benefits from improved scrap spreads and approximately $4.0 million of lower amortization costs. Segment income was also positively impacted by approximately $9.0 million of acquisition related synergies and productivity savings, primarily related to the 2007 Acquisitions. These improvements in segment results were partially offset by reductions in segment income of approximately $9.0 million associated with decreased volumes, and approximately $14.0 million from the impacts of higher input and landfill costs.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) decreased $2.1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the prior year period due to the following:
¡ | Corporate SG&A expense increased approximately $5.6 million primarily due to higher professional fees associated with certain global procurement savings initiatives, strengthening our global finance organization, increased depreciation expense and changes in currency exchange rates. |
¡ | Segment SG&A expense decreased $7.7 million in the third quarter of 2008 as compared to the prior year period due primarily to recording $14.1 million less amortization expense associated with intangible assets recorded in connection with the TPG Acquisition. The valuation of those intangible assets was completed in the third quarter of 2007, at which time a catch-up adjustment to record nine months of expense was recorded. These decreases were partially offset by changes in currency exchange rates and the 2007 Acquisitions which increased SG&A expense by approximately $4.0 million and $2.0 million, respectively. |
As a percentage of revenues, consolidated SG&A expense decreased from 5.5% in the three months ended September 30, 2007 to 5.2% in the three months ended September 30, 2008.
Restructuring and Other Charges
During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded restructuring and other charges totaling $61.3 million, of which $34.3 million was non-cash related and $27.0 million was cash related. The charges primarily related to the following:
On July 12, 2008, we announced that the permanent closure of the Global Rolled and Extruded Products segments Cap de la Madeleine, Quebec aluminum rolling mill facility would occur following an orderly shut down of all remaining activities at the facility because of the permanent and irreparable damage suffered by the operations as a result of labor issues. We had been engaged in negotiations and discussions regarding a new collective bargaining agreement for many months with representatives of the union representing production and maintenance workers at the facility. The union failed to ratify a new agreement during these negotiations and ultimately rejected our final proposal for a new collective bargaining agreement twice in July 2008. Substantially all production at this facility ceased in September 2008.
We recorded charges of $53.7 million related to the closure within Restructuring and other charges as well as $13.3 million within Cost of sales in the Consolidated Statement of Operations during the three months ended September 30, 2008. These charges consisted of the following:
¡ | Asset impairment charges of approximately $29.1 million relating to property, plant and equipment. We based the determination of the impairments of these assets on the undiscounted cash flows expected to be realized from the affected assets and recorded the related assets at fair value as determined by an independent third party appraisal; |
30
¡ | Employee severance, health care continuation, and outplacement costs of $3.3 million associated with approximately 90 hourly and salaried employees. The majority of all affected personnel have left their positions as of September 30, 2008; |
¡ | Curtailment charges relating to defined benefit pension and other postemployment benefit plans of $12.8 million covering the affected employees. Settlement of these plans will result in an additional estimated charge of approximately $4.0 million and is expected to occur 2009 or 2010; |
¡ | Other closure related charges of $8.5 million related primarily to contract terminations and costs associated with environmental remediation efforts required as a result of the closure; and |
¡ | In addition to these charges, all of which are included within Restructuring and other charges, we recorded inventory impairment charges and excess production costs attributable to the closure of $13.3 million which have been included within Cost of sales in the consolidated statement of operations inventory. |
In addition to the charges described above, we will continue to incur severance, security, utility and other costs related to the closed facility. These costs, estimated at $6.5 million, will be recognized as incurred. Total costs expected to be incurred as a result of the closure are estimated to be $73.5 million.
We recorded $1.1 million of cash restructuring charges and $0.2 million of non-cash asset impairment charges during the three months ended September 30, 2008, primarily related to the shutdown of our Toronto, Canada and Bedford, Ohio coil coating facilities within the Global Rolled and Extruded Products segment. Production at these facilities has been transferred to other Aleris facilities and all of the affected employees have left their positions as of September 30, 2008. We also temporarily idled the majority of production at our Richmond, Virginia rolling mill and closed our ALSCO divisional headquarters in Raleigh, North Carolina. We based the determination of the impairments of the assets on the undiscounted cash flows expected to be realized from the affected assets and recorded the related assets at fair value. Cash restructuring costs included the costs to move assets to other facilities, severance costs and contract cancellation costs.
We recorded $1.5 million of cash restructuring charges and $4.7 million of non-cash asset impairment charges during the three months ended September 30, 2008, primarily related to the shutdown of our Shelbyville, Rockwood and Dickson Tennessee operations as well as our Bedford, Indiana and Guelph, Ontario operations all within our Global Recycling segment. We based the determination of the impairments of the assets on the undiscounted cash flows expected to be realized from the affected assets and recorded the related assets at fair value. Cash restructuring costs included the costs to move assets to other facilities, severance costs and contract cancellation costs. In addition to the $1.5 million of charges incurred in connection with the Shelbyville shutdown in the three months ended September 30, 2008, we expect to incur approximately $1.2 million of additional utility and other costs related to the closure.
Losses (Gains) on Derivative Financial Instruments
Amounts recorded within Losses (gains) on derivative financial instruments include the realized and unrealized gains and losses associated with derivatives that we do not account for as hedges under SFAS No. 133. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded $7.7 million of realized losses on our metal derivative financial instruments and $19.4 million of realized gains on our currency derivative financial instruments. Purchase accounting rules under U.S. GAAP prevented us from including in segment income $4.9 million of economic gains related to metal and currency derivative financial instruments that settled during the three months ended September 30, 2008. See the prior discussion of segment income as well as Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk for additional information regarding our derivative financial instruments. Realized gains and losses are included within the income of the respective segments to which the derivatives relate.
During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded unrealized losses of $97.9 million on metal derivative financial instruments, $34.5 million on natural gas derivative financial instruments and $18.9 million on currency derivative financial instruments. These resulted from the unfavorable movement of the LME prices of aluminum and zinc as well as natural gas prices and an unfavorable movement in the U.S. dollar to euro exchange rates from June 30, 2008 (or the time the contractual terms of the derivative instruments were agreed upon if after June 30, 2008) to September 30, 2008. The losses are not included within segment income and do not represent the realized gains or losses that will be recognized upon settlement. Such gains and losses will be determined based upon the prevailing LME and exchange rates at the time of settlement.
31
During the three months ended September 30, 2007, we recorded net realized and unrealized gains of $5.5 million on our metal and currency derivative financial instruments.
Interest Expense
Interest expense in the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased $7.2 million from the comparable period of 2007. The increase resulted from higher levels of debt outstanding, primarily as a result of the 2007 Acquisitions and impact of changes in currency exchange rates.
Benefit from Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate was 30.5% and 105.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 differed from the federal statutory rate applied to losses before income taxes primarily as a result of the mix of income, losses and tax rates between tax jurisdictions.
We have valuation allowances recorded to reduce certain deferred tax assets to amounts that are more likely than not to be realized. The remaining valuation allowances relate to our potential inability to utilize certain foreign net operating loss carry forwards and U.S. state net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. We intend to maintain these valuation allowances until sufficient positive evidence exists (such as cumulative positive earnings and estimated future taxable income) to support their reversal.
Discontinued Operations
On January 11, 2008, we sold our Zinc Business for total cash consideration of $287.2 million. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we revised our estimate of the working capital adjustment and recorded a loss of $1.2 million. Final determination of the working capital delivered occurred in the fourth quarter of 2008 and no further adjustments to the net gain are anticipated. The Company provided information technology, accounting and treasury services for a transitional period of approximately nine months, but we have had no other significant continuing involvement in the operations of the Zinc Business subsequent to the closing of the sale. In addition, the Company has realized no continuing cash flows from the Zinc Business subsequent to the closing of the sale. We applied the proceeds from the sale of the Zinc Business to pay down the Revolving Credit Facility.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 COMPARED TO THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
Revenues
The following tables show revenues and shipments by segment and the percentage changes from the prior year period:
For the nine months ended September 30 | Percent change |
||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
(in millions, except for percentages) | |||||||||||||
Revenues: |
|||||||||||||
Global Rolled and Extruded Products |
$ | 3,128.9 | $ | 3,299.8 | (5 | )% | |||||||
Global Recycling |
1,809.6 | 1,267.1 | 43 | ||||||||||
Intersegment revenues |
(80.7 | ) | (111.0 | ) | (27 | ) | |||||||
Consolidated revenues |
$ | 4,857.8 | $ | 4,455.9 | 9 | % | |||||||
Pounds shipped: |
|||||||||||||
Global Rolled and Extruded Products |
1,541.8 | 1,646.8 | (6 | )% | |||||||||
Global Recycling |
2,604.0 | 2,332.7 | 12 | ||||||||||
Total pounds shipped |
4,145.8 | 3,979.5 | 4 | % | |||||||||
Consolidated revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased $401.9 million as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Contributing to the increase were the 2007 Acquisitions and the acquisitions of certain assets of A.E. and H.T. which combined accounted for an incremental $607.3 million. Excluding the impact of the 2007 Acquisitions, Global Rolled and
32
Extruded Products revenues decreased $215.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as movements in currency exchange rates and higher rolling margins were more than offset by lower shipment levels and the impacts of lower average primary aluminum prices. Excluding the impact of the 2007 Acquisition and the acquisition of H.T., Global Recycling revenues decreased $20.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the prior year period primarily due to lower average aluminum prices and lower shipment levels which more than offset movements in currency exchange rates.
Global Rolled and Extruded Products Revenues
Global Rolled and Extruded Products revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 decreased $170.9 million compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007. This decrease was primarily due to the following:
¡ | A decrease in shipment levels in the first nine months of 2008 as compared to the first nine months of 2007 of approximately 5.0%, excluding the impact of the 2007 Acquisitions and the acquisition of certain assets of A.E. in the first quarter of 2008, resulting in decreased revenues of approximately $315.0 million. The reduction in shipments is a result of reduced demand in the North American housing segment and across most other industry segments served by our North American operations as well as reductions associated with softening demand in Europe; and |
¡ | Despite the lower demand, rolling margins improved in the first nine months of 2008 as compared to the first nine months of 2007 but were more than offset by decreases in the average price of primary aluminum passed on to our customers resulting in a net decrease in revenues of approximately $58.0 million. |
These decreases were partially offset by the following:
¡ | Changes in currency exchange rates, which increased revenues by approximately $222.0 million; and |
¡ | The 2007 Acquisitions and the acquisition of certain assets of A.E., which generated combined incremental revenues of $44.5 million in the first nine months of 2008. |
Global Recycling Revenues
Global Recycling revenues increased $542.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007. This increase was primarily due to the following:
¡ | The revenues associated with the 2007 Acquisitions and the acquisition of H.T., which combined to generate incremental revenues of $562.7 million; and |
¡ | Changes in currency exchange rates which increased revenues by approximately $59.0 million. |
These increases were partially offset by the following:
¡ | Shipment levels which decreased approximately 10.0% resulting in a decrease in revenues of approximately $51.0 million, excluding the incremental impact of the 2007 Acquisitions and the acquisition of H.T., in the first nine months of 2008 compared to the prior year period. The decrease in shipment levels was principally due to decreases with our U.S. automotive customers; and |
¡ | A decrease in the average price of aluminum passed along to our customers in the first nine months of 2008 as compared to the prior year period resulting in a decrease in revenues of approximately $15.0 million. |
33
Segment Income and Gross Profit
For the nine months ended September 30 | Percent change |
||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
(in millions, except percentages) | |||||||||||||
Segment income: |
|||||||||||||
Global Rolled and Extruded Products |
$ | 61.8 | $ | 95.2 | (35 | )% | |||||||
Global Recycling |
67.1 | 49.9 | 34 | ||||||||||
Total segment income |
128.9 | 145.1 | (11 | )% | |||||||||
Items not included in gross profit: |
|||||||||||||
Segment selling, general and administrative expense |
146.9 | 137.7 | 7 | % | |||||||||
Realized losses (gains) on derivative financial instruments |
10.1 | (12.6 | ) | * | |||||||||
Other (income) expense, net |
(7.8 | ) | 5.7 | * | |||||||||
Gross profit |
$ | 278.1 | $ | 275.9 | 1 | % | |||||||
* | Results not meaningful |
Global Rolled and Extruded Products Segment Income
Global Rolled and Extruded Products segment income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 decreased by $33.4 million compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007. This decrease was primarily due to the following:
¡ | Lower volumes during the first nine months of 2008 compared to the prior year period which reduced segment income by approximately $85.0 million; |
¡ | Material margins were negatively impacted by metal price lag and tighter scrap spreads in North America, offsetting improved pricing and mix in Europe, and reduced segment income by an estimated $43.0 million; |
¡ | Higher hardener, freight, energy and personnel costs, which reduced segment income by approximately $42.0 million; and |
¡ | Inventory impairment charges and excess production costs relating to the permanent closure of our Cap de la Madeleine, Quebec facility which decreased segment income by $13.3 million. |
These decreases were partially offset by the following:
¡ | The lessening impact of the application of purchase accounting rules preventing the recognition of economic benefits related to acquired aluminum, currency and natural gas derivatives that settled during the first nine months of 2008 and 2007. Segment income was lower by approximately $19.3 million and $48.1 million in the first nine months of 2008 and 2007, respectively, as a result of these rules. Further, the 2007 results were negatively impacted by approximately $39.7 million of additional cost of sales resulting from purchase accounting adjustments to record acquired inventories to fair value in connection with the TPG Acquisition; |
¡ | Gross productivity and acquisition synergy related savings which positively impacted segment income by an estimated $54.0 million in the first nine months of 2008; and |
¡ | The impact of movements of currency exchange rates, which resulted in an increase in segment income of approximately $35.0 million. |
Global Recycling Segment Income
Global Recycling segment income in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $17.2 million compared to the prior year period due primarily to approximately $40.0 million of benefits from improved scrap spreads and the impact of higher LME on aluminum sales. Segment income was also positively impacted by approximately $27.0 million of gross acquisition related synergies and productivity savings, primarily related to the 2007 Acquisitions, in the first nine months of 2008. The 2007 results were negatively impacted by approximately $8.0 million of additional cost of sales resulting from purchase accounting adjustments to record acquired inventories to fair value in connection with the TPG Acquisition. These improvements in segment results were partially offset by reductions in segment income of approximately $23.0 million associated with decreased volumes, approximately $30.0 million from the impacts of general inflation, higher input and landfill costs, and the impact of movements of currency exchange rates, which resulted in a decrease in segment income of approximately $3.0 million.
34
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) increased $25.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the prior year period due to the following:
¡ | Corporate SG&A expense increased $16.1 million primarily due to higher professional fees associated with certain global procurement savings initiatives, strengthening our global finance organization, increased depreciation expense and changes in currency exchange rates. |
¡ | Segment SG&A expense increased $9.2 million in the first nine months of 2008 as compared to the prior year period. The 2007 Acquisitions, which comprised $6.0 million of the increase. Additionally, changes in currency exchange rates resulted in an increase of approximately $12.0 million. These increases in SG&A expenses were partially offset by an estimated $6.0 million of cost savings resulting from cost reduction initiatives led by integration activities and our Six Sigma program. |
As a percentage of revenues, consolidated SG&A expense increased from 4.8% in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 to 4.9% in the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Restructuring and Other Charges
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded restructuring and other charges totaling approximately $75.1 million of which approximately $40.1 million were non-cash related and approximately $35.0 million were cash related. The charges primarily resulted from the following activities:
On July 12, 2008, we announced that the permanent closure of the Global Rolled and Extruded Products segments Cap de la Madeleine, Quebec aluminum rolling mill facility would occur following an orderly shut down of all remaining activities at the facility because of the permanent and irreparable damage suffered by the operations as a result of labor issues. We had been engaged in negotiations and discussions regarding a new collective bargaining agreement for many months with representatives of the union representing production and maintenance workers at the facility. The union failed to ratify a new agreement during these negotiations and ultimately rejected our final proposal for a new collective bargaining agreement twice in July 2008. Substantially all production at this facility ceased in September 2008.
We recorded charges of $53.7 million related to the closure within Restructuring and other charges as well as $13.3 million within Cost of sales in the Consolidated Statement of Operations during the three months ended September 30, 2008. These charges consisted of the following:
¡ | Asset impairment charges of approximately $29.1 million relating to property, plant and equipment. We based the determination of the impairments of these assets on the undiscounted cash flows expected to be realized from the affected assets and recorded the related assets at fair value as determined by an independent third party appraisal; |
¡ | Employee severance, health care continuation, and outplacement costs of $3.3 million associated with approximately 90 hourly and salaried employees. The majority of all affected personnel have left their positions as of September 30, 2008; |
¡ | Curtailment charges relating to defined benefit pension and other postemployment benefit plans of $12.8 million covering the affected employees. Settlement of these plans will result in an additional estimated charge of approximately $4.0 million and is expected to occur in 2009 or 2010; |
¡ | Other closure related charges of $8.5 million related primarily to contract terminations and costs associated with environmental remediation efforts required as a result of the closure; and |
¡ | In addition to these charges, all of which are included within Restructuring and other charges, we recorded inventory impairment charges and excess production costs attributable to the closure of $13.3 million which have been included within Cost of sales in the consolidated statement of operations inventory. |
In addition to the charges described above, we will continue to incur severance, security, utility and other costs related to the closure. These costs, estimated at $6.5 million, will be recognized as incurred. Total costs expected to be incurred as a result of the closure are estimated to be $73.5 million.
35
We recorded $7.3 million of cash restructuring charges and $0.6 million of non-cash asset impairment charges during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, primarily related to the shutdown of our Toronto, Canada and Bedford, Ohio coil coating facilities within the Global Rolled and Extruded Products segment. Production at these facilities has been transferred to other Aleris facilities and all of the affected employees have left their positions as of September 30, 2008. We also temporarily idled the majority of production at our Richmond, Virginia rolling mill and closed our ALSCO divisional headquarters in Raleigh, North Carolina. We based the determination of the impairments of the assets on the undiscounted cash flows expected to be realized from the affected assets and recorded the related assets at fair value. Cash restructuring costs included the costs to move assets to other facilities, severance costs and contract cancellation costs. We also recorded a non-cash asset impairment charge of $1.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 at our Koblenz, Germany facility.
We recorded $2.6 million of cash restructuring charges and $8.9 million of non-cash asset impairment charges during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, primarily related to the shutdown of our Shelbyville, Rockwood and Dickson Tennessee operations as well as our Bedford, Indiana and Guelph, Ontario operations all within our Global Recycling segment. We based the determination of the impairments of the assets on the undiscounted cash flows expected to be realized from the affected assets and recorded the related assets at fair value. Cash restructuring costs included the costs to move assets to other facilities, severance costs and contract cancellation costs. In addition to the $6.3 million of charges incurred in connection with the Shelbyville shutdown in the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we expect to incur $1.2 million of additional utility and other costs related to the closure.
Losses (Gains) on Derivative Financial Instruments
Amounts recorded within Losses (gains) on derivative financial instruments include the realized and unrealized gains and losses associated with derivatives that we do not account for as hedges under SFAS No. 133. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded $50.0 million of realized losses on our metal derivative financial instruments and $41.5 million of realized gains on our currency derivative financial instruments. Purchase accounting rules under U.S. GAAP prevented us from including in segment income $16.8 million of economic gains related to metal and currency derivative financial instruments that settled during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. See the prior discussion of segment income as well as Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk for additional information regarding our derivative financial instruments. Realized gains, net of adjustments to comply with purchase accounting rules, have been included within the income of the respective segments to which the derivatives relate.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we also recorded unrealized losses of $30.6 million on metal derivative financial instruments, $25.4 million on natural gas derivative financial instruments and $18.1 million on currency derivative financial instruments. These losses resulted from the unfavorable movement of the LME prices of aluminum and zinc as well as natural gas prices and U.S. dollar to euro exchange rates from December 31, 2007 (or the time the contractual terms of the derivative instruments were agreed upon if after December 31, 2007) to September 30, 2008. The losses are not included within segment income and do not represent the realized gains or losses that will be recognized upon settlement. Such gains and losses will be determined based upon the prevailing LME and exchange rates at the time of settlement.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we recorded net realized and unrealized gains of approximately $32.7 million on our metal and currency derivative financial instruments.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased $20.5 million from the comparable period of 2007. The increase resulted from higher levels of debt outstanding, primarily as a result of the 2007 Acquisitions, and the impact of changes in currency exchange rates.
Benefit from Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate was 29.8% and 73.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 differed from the federal statutory rate applied to losses before income taxes primarily as a result of the mix of income, losses and tax rates between tax jurisdictions.
We have valuation allowances recorded to reduce certain deferred tax assets to amounts that are more likely than not to be realized. The remaining valuation allowances relate to our potential inability to utilize certain foreign net operating loss carry forwards and U.S. state net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. We intend to maintain these valuation allowances until sufficient positive evidence exists (such as cumulative positive earnings and estimated future taxable income) to support their reversal.
36
Discontinued Operations
On January 11, 2008, we sold our Zinc Business for total cash consideration of $287.2 million. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we revised our estimate of the working capital adjustment and recorded a loss of $1.2 million. Final determination of the working capital delivered occurred in the fourth quarter of 2008 and no further adjustments to the net gain are anticipated. The Company will provide information technology, accounting and treasury services for a transitional period of approximately nine months, but we have had no other significant continuing involvement in the operations of the Zinc Business subsequent to the closing of the sale. In addition, the Company has realized no continuing cash flows from the Zinc Business subsequent to the closing of the sale. We applied the proceeds from the sale of the Zinc Business to pay down the Revolving Credit Facility.
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $2.4 million. In addition to the results of operations for the eleven days ended January 11, 2008, the results of discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 includes amounts related to the revision of the purchase price adjustment associated with the working capital delivered as well as adjustments to the estimated income tax expense associated with the sale. (Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $4.8 million.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We expect to finance our operations and capital expenditures from internally generated cash and amounts available under our credit facilities. We have traditionally financed our acquisitions and capacity expansions from a combination of cash on hand and funds from long-term borrowings. The TPG Acquisition has significantly increased our level of indebtedness. Our ability to pay principal and interest on our debt, fund working capital and make anticipated capital expenditures depends on our future performance, which is subject to general economic conditions and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. We believe that based on current and anticipated levels of operations and conditions in our industry and segments, a combination of cash on hand, internally generated funds and borrowings available to us will be adequate to fund our current level of operational needs and to make required payments of principal and interest on our debt for the foreseeable future.
On September 10, 2008, we amended our revolving credit facility to, in part, increase the maximum borrowings by $244.0 million and increase the maximum amount provided for the issuance of letters of credit by $25.0 million. Our revolving credit facility, as amended, provides senior secured financing of up to $1,094.0 million. As of September 30, 2008, we estimate that our borrowing base would have supported borrowings of $716.0 million. After giving effect to the $386.9 million of outstanding borrowings as well as outstanding letters of credit of $36.2 million, we had $292.9 million available for borrowing as of September 30, 2008.
On November 12, 2008, as a means to increase liquidity and given the economic uncertainty, we announced our intention to make a permitted election under the indenture governing our 9%/9 3/4% Senior Notes due 2014 (the Notes) to pay all interest under the Notes that is due on June 15, 2009, for the interest period beginning on December 15, 2008 and ending on June 14, 2009, entirely in kind (PIK Interest). This option will save $27 million in cash in the first half of 2009.
Cash Flows from Operations
Cash used by our operating activities was $146.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to $149.2 million of cash provided by operating activities in the comparable period of 2007. Cash used by operations in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was primarily impacted by a reduction in operating results, after considering non-cash items, as well as higher net operating assets. The change in operating assets was primarily attributable to increases in accounts receivable, and prepaid expenses and other current assets as well a decrease in accounts payable. These negative impacts were partially offset by reductions in inventory and higher accruals for semi-annual interest payments to be made in December 2008. The increase in accounts receivable reflects higher sales level in September 2008 as compared to December 2007. The increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets was primarily driven by additional margin calls required during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 relating to derivative financial instruments. As the LME price of aluminum has declined, certain of our derivative financial instruments requiring us to purchase aluminum at a fixed price in the future have also lost value. As a result, our counterparties have required that we fund these losses with cash and at September 30, 2008, we have funded $37.6 million of these margin calls. Additional margin calls have been required subsequent to September 30, 2008 as the LME price of aluminum has continued to decline. Should the LME rise, this cash will be refunded back to us or applied against realized losses as the derivatives settle. The decrease in accounts payable and inventories resulted, in part, from lower LME and euro values as compared to December 2007.
37
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Cash flows from investing activities primarily reflects the proceeds from the sale of the Zinc Business of $278.0 million, partially offset by cash used for purchases of businesses and capital expenditures of $19.9 million and $107.6 million, respectively, in the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Capital expenditures decreased from the prior year period primarily as a result of the completion of the 160 inch hotmill in Koblenz, Germany in early 2008. Overall capital expenditures for 2008 are expected to be approximately $130.0 million.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Cash flows from financing activities generally reflect changes in our borrowings and debt obligations. Net cash used by our financing activities was $6.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to $245.6 million of cash provided by our financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
EBITDA
We report our financial results in accordance with U.S. GAAP. However, our management believes that certain non-U.S. GAAP performance measures, which we use in managing the business, may provide investors with additional meaningful comparisons between current results and results in prior periods. EBITDA is an example of a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure that we believe provides investors and other users of our financial information with useful information. Management uses EBITDA as a performance metric and believes this measure provides additional information commonly used by our stockholder, noteholders and lenders with respect to the performance of our fundamental business activities, as well as our ability to meet our future debt service, capital expenditures and working capital needs.
Our EBITDA calculations represent (loss) income from continuing operations before interest income and expense, benefit from income taxes, depreciation and amortization and minority interests, net of benefit from income taxes. EBITDA is also used for internal analysis purposes and is a component of the fixed charge coverage financial covenants under our 2006 Credit Facilities and our Notes. EBITDA should not be construed as an alternative to net income as an indicator of our performance, or cash flows from our operating activities, investing activities or financing activities as a measure of liquidity, in each case as such measure is determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. EBITDA as we use it may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other entities. Historical EBITDA as presented below is likely to differ from EBITDA as defined under the indentures for the Notes and the credit agreements for our 2006 Credit Facilities.
38
Our reconciliation of EBITDA to (loss) income from continuing operations and cash provided (used) by operating activities is as follows:
For the three months ended September 30 |
For the nine months ended September 30 |
|||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
EBITDA |
$ | (165.8 | ) | $ | 74.3 | $ | 63.9 | $ | 227.7 | |||||||
Interest expense |
(58.2 | ) | (51.0 | ) | (171.9 | ) | (151.4 | ) | ||||||||
Interest income |
0.2 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||
Benefit from income taxes |
86.3 | 45.6 | 83.2 | 51.2 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(59.1 | ) | (67.1 | ) | (173.2 | ) | (148.3 | ) | ||||||||
Minority interests, net of provision for income taxes |
- | (0.2 | ) | (0.5 | ) | (0.6 | ) | |||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
(196.6 | ) | 2.3 | (196.9 | ) | (19.5 | ) | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
59.1 | 67.1 | 173.2 | 148.3 | ||||||||||||
Benefit from deferred income taxes |
(97.3 | ) | (44.5 | ) | (91.8 | ) | (50.3 | ) | ||||||||
Restructuring, inventory impairment and other charges: |
||||||||||||||||
Charges |
74.6 | 2.0 | 88.4 | 10.9 | ||||||||||||
Payments |
(9.3 | ) | (2.6 | ) | (25.6 | ) | (11.7 | ) | ||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
- | 1.1 | 1.8 | 2.9 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized losses (gains) on derivative financial instruments |
151.3 | 22.9 | 74.1 | (17.4 | ) | |||||||||||
Other non-cash charges related to step-up in carrying value of inventory |
- | 2.7 | 0.3 | 46.2 | ||||||||||||
Other non-cash charges |
4.4 | 4.6 | 11.6 | 10.4 | ||||||||||||
Net change in working capital |
55.4 | 3.1 | (181.4 | ) | 29.4 | |||||||||||
Cash provided (used) by operating activities |
$ | 41.6 | $ | 58.7 | $ | (146.3 | ) | $ | 149.2 | |||||||
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to the valuation of inventory, property and equipment and goodwill, the effectiveness of certain of our derivative instruments under SFAS No. 133, allowances for doubtful accounts, workers compensation liabilities, income taxes, pensions and other postretirement benefits and environmental liabilities. Our management bases its estimates on historical experience, actuarial valuations and other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
A summary of our significant accounting policies and estimates is included in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. There has been no significant change to our critical accounting policies or estimates during the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET TRANSACTIONS
We had no off-balance sheet arrangements at September 30, 2008.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157 establishes a common definition for fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial assets and financial liabilities for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Issued in February 2008, FSP 157-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13 removed leasing transactions accounted for under Statement 13 and related guidance from the scope of SFAS No. 157. FSP 157-2, Partial Deferral of the Effective Date of Statement 157, deferred the
39
effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. FSP 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active, clarifies the determination of fair value in a market that is not active and provides an example that illustrates key considerations when applying the principles in SFAS No. 157 to financial assets when the market for those assets is not active.
The implementation of SFAS No. 157 for financial assets and financial liabilities, effective January 1, 2008, has not had an impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations. The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilitiesincluding an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value and report unrealized gains and losses on these instruments in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We did not adopt the optional provisions of this statement.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations. This Statement provides greater consistency in the accounting and financial reporting of business combinations. It requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction, establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed, requires certain restructuring and all acquisition-related costs to be expensed as incurred, and requires the acquirer to disclose the nature and financial effect of the business combination. SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this statement will not have an impact on previously completed acquisitions; however, upon adoption, the Company will expense all acquisition costs incurred prior to December 31, 2008 for all acquisitions not consummated prior to that date. At September 30, 2008, the Company had approximately $0.5 million of costs related to pending acquisitions included within Other current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements. This Statement amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company has not yet determined the impact of adoption on its results of operations or financial position.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activitiesan amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures about an entitys derivative and hedging activities, including (i) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (ii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133, and (iii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. This standard becomes effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. Earlier adoption of SFAS No. 161 and, separately, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption, are encouraged. As SFAS No. 161 only requires enhanced disclosures, this standard will have no impact on the results of operations or financial position.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
In the ordinary course of our business, we are exposed to earnings and cash flow volatility resulting from changes in the prices of aluminum and other metals, natural gas, currency and interest rates. We use derivative instruments, such as forwards, futures, options, collars, swaps and interest rate swaps to manage the effect of such changes. These derivative financial instruments reduce the impact of both favorable and unfavorable fluctuations in aluminum prices as well as fluctuations in currency and interest rates.
Derivative contracts are used primarily to reduce uncertainty and volatility and cover underlying exposures. Our commodity and derivative activities are subject to the management, direction and control of a special Risk Management Committee of the Board of Directors.
We are exposed to losses in the event of non-performance by the counterparties to the derivative contracts discussed below. Counterparties are evaluated for creditworthiness and risk assessment prior to our initiating contract activities. The counterparties creditworthiness is then monitored on an ongoing basis, and credit levels are reviewed to ensure that there is not an inappropriate concentration of credit outstanding to any particular counterparty.
40
Commodity Price Risk
Aluminum ingots are internationally produced, priced and traded commodities, with their principal trading market being the LME. As part of our efforts to preserve margins, we enter into forwards, futures and options contracts. For accounting purposes, we do not consider our aluminum derivative instruments as hedges and, as a result, changes in the fair value of these derivatives are recorded immediately in our consolidated operating results.
Metal Hedging
The Global Rolled and Extruded Products segment enters into various derivative financial instruments designed to reduce the impact of changing primary aluminum prices on future sales for which aluminum has not yet been purchased on a transactional basis and, from time to time, on inventory or future purchases of inventory for which a fixed sale price has not yet been determined. During the third quarter, we adjusted our inventory hedging strategy to preserve our liquidity position as LME prices began to decline by unwinding certain of the inventory hedges. While protecting liquidity, this decision exposed the Global Rolled and Extruded Products segment to additional metal price lag as some higher priced inventory is no longer hedged.
The Global Recycling segment enters into LME high-grade and alloy aluminum forward sales and purchase contracts to reduce the risk associated with changing metal prices. These forward contracts are settled in the month of pricing of shipments.
As we do not account for our metal derivatives as hedges, the changes in their fair values are included within Losses (gains) on derivative financial instruments in our Consolidated Statement of Operations. Our measurement of segment profitability only includes the gain or loss associated with those derivatives that settled during the period.
Segment income included realized losses of $3.6 million and $32.3 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and realized gains of $37.4 million and $53.3 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, related to settled metal hedging contracts. However, as a result of application of purchase accounting rules, we did not recognize additional cash gains of $4.5 million and $15.2 million on derivatives that settled in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and additional cash losses of $13.1 million and $41.8 million on derivatives that settled in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. These rules will continue to impact our reported segment results in future periods.
Natural Gas Hedging
Natural gas is the principal fuel used in the processing of aluminum and production of our rolled aluminum products. Natural gas prices are volatile, and we attempt to manage this volatility through the use of derivative commodity instruments. Our natural gas financial derivatives are traded in months forward, and settlement dates are scheduled to coincide with gas purchases during those future periods. These contracts reference physical natural gas prices or appropriate NYMEX futures contract prices. As we do not account for these derivatives as hedges, the changes in their fair value are included within Losses (gains) on derivative financial instruments. Segment income included a realized loss on the settlement of these contracts totaling $3.4 million in the three months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to losses of $3.5 million and of $3.8 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. As a result of the application of purchase accounting rules, we did not recognize additional cash losses of $0.2 million and gains of $2.1 million in our segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, associated with natural gas hedges that settled during those periods. There were no such losses in the first nine months of 2008.
Financial Risk
Currency
We have exposure to fluctuations in currencies as certain of the purchases and sales entered into by our European rolled and extruded products operations are denominated in currencies other than their functional currencies. We have entered into foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the impact of currency fluctuations associated with these transactions. As with the acquired aluminum derivatives, the currency forward contracts are not accounted for as hedges and, as a result, the changes in their fair value are recorded immediately in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. However, as with the aluminum derivatives, our measurement of segment performance only includes gains and losses associated with settled currency derivatives. We recorded realized gains of $19.0 million and $39.0 million within segment income in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively and realized gains of $5.9 million and $9.7 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively.
41
As with our aluminum derivatives, the application of purchase accounting prevented us from recording $0.5 million and $1.5 million of cash flow losses on settled currency hedges during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and $1.8 million and $6.0 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. These rules will continue to impact our reported Losses (gains) on derivative financial instruments and segment income in future periods.
Interest Rates
We have historically funded, and intend to continue to fund, our operations from our credit facilities. A substantial amount of our indebtedness bears interest at variable rates. In March 2007, we entered into an interest rate swap to fix the base interest rate paid on a portion of the amount outstanding under the Term Loan Facility. In March 2008, we further reduced our exposure to interest rate fluctuations by entering into a second interest rate swap to fix the interest we will pay on an incremental portion of our Term Loan Facility. As a result of these swaps, we were hedged for approximately $750.0 million of Term Loan Facility debt as of September 30, 2008. Under the terms of the swap agreements, we will receive interest based upon LIBOR and pay base rates of 4.93% and 3.45%. These swaps meet the hedge accounting rules under SFAS No. 133 and accordingly, changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps are included within Accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The swaps mature in March 2010 and March 2012, respectively.
Fair Values and Sensitivity Analysis
The following table shows the fair values of outstanding derivative contracts at September 30, 2008 and the effect on the fair value of a hypothetical adverse change in the market prices that existed at September 30, 2008:
Derivative |
Fair Value | Impact of 10% adverse price change |
||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
Metal |
$ | (15.1 | ) | $ | (55.1 | ) | ||
Natural gas |
(26.0 | ) | (34.1 | ) | ||||
Currency |
4.8 | 3.8 | ||||||
Interest rate swap |
(5.2 | ) | (6.9 | ) |
The disclosures above do not take into account the underlying commitments or anticipated transactions. If the underlying items were included in the analysis, the gains or losses on our derivative instruments would be offset by gains and losses realized on the purchase of the physical commodities. Actual results will be determined by a number of factors outside of our control and could vary significantly from the amounts disclosed. For additional information on derivative financial instruments, see Note M of our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this quarterly report.
42
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We have established and we maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in rules and forms promulgated by the Securities Exchange Commission (the SEC). As of September 30, 2008, an evaluation was carried out, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chairman of the board and chief executive officer, and our executive vice president and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2008. Based on that evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, our management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to the identification of a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the 2007 audit as discussed below.
In Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting included in Item 9A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the SEC (the Management Report), management reported that a material weakness existed in the Companys internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007 and the Company is in the process of taking remedial action to correct the weakness. Since the remedial steps have not been completed as of September 30, 2008, management performed additional analysis and other procedures to provide reasonable assurance that the consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Not withstanding the existence of the material weakness described below, management believes that the consolidated financial statements included in this quarterly report present fairly in all material respects the Companys financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
In the Management Report, we determined that there were control deficiencies in the financial statement close process that, when aggregated, constituted a material weakness. The control deficiencies related to (a) the accounting for income taxes, consolidation of subsidiaries, accounting for derivatives instruments, accounting for business combinations and accounting for discontinued operations, (b) the Company having difficulty meeting internal and external reporting timetables, and (c) an imbalance of detect and prevent controls at the business unit level and a lack of emphasis on local level accountability, which resulted in certain undetected errors. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we began implementing the remedial measures described in the Management Report that include:
¡ | Management established an oversight group led by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to monitor progress of the remediation efforts related to the material weakness, optimizing global financial processes and enhancing the skill sets of the finance organization personnel; |
¡ | During the third quarter of 2008, we adopted a newly revised and comprehensive set of accounting policies and procedures and will continue to train the organization during the fourth quarter on these policies; and |
¡ | Management continues to expand capabilities and add new resources to the global finance organization to provide more oversight, proactive preventative controls and allow more timely review of complex accounting areas. |
During the first nine months of 2008, we have remediated and tested substantially all of the interim internal controls over financial reporting designed to eliminate the deficiencies and significant deficiencies which gave rise to the material weakness in 2007. Although certain testing is subject to completion in the fourth quarter of 2008, we believe our plan for remediation is appropriate and will be effective in resolving the control deficiencies that led to the material weakness in internal controls in 2007; however, the final assessment of the effectiveness of our remediation efforts remains subject to managements and our external auditors testing of the implemented controls during the preparation of our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008.
43
In addition to other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 which could materially impact our business, financial condition or future results. Risks disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may materially adversely impact our business, financial condition or operating results.
The information presented below updates, and should be read in conjunction with, the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Difficult conditions in the capital, credit, commodities, automobile and housing markets and in the overall economy could materially adversely affect our financial position and results of operations, and we do not know if these conditions will improve in the near future.
Our financial position and results of operations could be materially adversely affected by difficult conditions and significant volatility in the capital, credit, commodities, automobile and housing markets and in the overall economy. These factors, combined with volatile oil prices, declining business and consumer confidence and increased unemployment, have precipitated an economic slowdown and fears of a possible recession. The difficult conditions in these markets and the overall economy affect our business in a number of ways. For example:
¡ | As a result of the recent volatility in commodity prices, we have significantly increased our prices for certain products and may have to increase prices again in the future. Any delays in implementing price increases or a failure to achieve market acceptance of future price increases could materially adversely affect our financial position and results of operations. See Risk FactorsWe may encounter increases in the cost of raw materials and energy, which could cause our cost of goods sold to increase thereby reducing operating results and limiting our operating flexibility under Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. |
¡ | Although we believe we have sufficient liquidity under our Revolving Credit Facility to run our business, under extreme market conditions there can be no assurance that such funds would be available or sufficient, and in such a case, we may not be able to successfully obtain additional financing on favorable terms, or at all. |
¡ | Market conditions could cause the counterparties to the derivative financial instruments we use to hedge our exposure to fluctuations in the prices of aluminum and other materials, natural gas, currency and interest rates to experience financial difficulties and, as a result, our efforts to hedge these exposures could prove unsuccessful and, furthermore, our ability to engage in additional hedging activities may decrease or become even more costly as a result of these conditions. See Risk FactorsWe may be unable to manage effectively our exposure to commodity price fluctuations, and our hedging activities may affect profitability in a changing metals price environment and subject our earnings to greater volatility from period-to-period under Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. |
¡ | Market conditions could result in our largest customers experiencing financial difficulties and/or electing to limit spending, which in turn could result in decreased sales and earnings for us. See Risk FactorsIf we were to lose order volumes from any of our largest customers, our sales volumes and revenues could be reduced and our cash flows lessened under Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. |
We do not know if market conditions or the state of the overall economy will improve in the near future.
44
Number |
Description | |
10.1 | Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of September 10, 2008 to the credit agreement, dated as of August 1, 2006, amended and restated as of December 19, 2006 and further amended as of November 9, 2007, among the Company, each subsidiary of the Company party thereto, the lenders party thereto, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as administrative agent, Deutsche Bank AG, Canada Branch, as Canadian administrative agent and certain other signatories thereto, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 15, 2008. | |
10.2 | Employment Agreement, dated as of October 16, 2008, between the Company, Aurora Acquisition Holdings, Inc. and Kevin L. Brown. | |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(a). | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(a). | |
32 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
| Previously filed. |
| Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
45
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Aleris International, Inc. | ||||
Date: November 12, 2008 | By | /s/ Kevin L. Brown | ||
Name: | Kevin L. Brown | |||
Title: | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | |||
(as Chief Financial Officer and Duly Authorized Officer) |
46
Number |
Description | |
10.1 | Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of September 10, 2008 to the credit agreement, dated as of August 1, 2006, amended and restated as of December 19, 2006 and further amended as of November 9, 2007, among the Company, each subsidiary of the Company party thereto, the lenders party thereto, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as administrative agent, Deutsche Bank AG, Canada Branch, as Canadian administrative agent and certain other signatories thereto, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 15, 2008. | |
10.2 | Employment Agreement, dated as of October 16, 2008, between the Company, Aurora Acquisition Holdings, Inc. and Kevin L. Brown. | |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(a). | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(a). | |
32 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
| Previously filed. |
| Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
47