UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

 

FORM 10-Q/A

 

Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2014

Commission File No. 1-33762

 

inContact, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

7730 S. Union Park Avenue, Suite 500, Salt Lake City, UT 84047

(Address of principal executive offices and Zip Code)

(801) 320-3200

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

Explanatory Note

Subsequent to the issuance of inContact, Inc.’s (“we”, the “Company” or “inContact”) 2014 Quarterly Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2014, we identified errors related to the calculation and assessment of state sales tax for certain of our products and services and the appropriate accounting for the related state sales tax obligations. We determined that the errors were not material to any period presented, but concluded that the related control deficiency that allowed the error to occur and not be detected on a timely basis amounted to a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting.

As a result, we are filing this amendment (Amendment) to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2014 (Original Form 10-Q) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on May 9, 2014 (Original Filing Date) to reflect changes in our assessment of internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures.  We have also included in this Amendment an adjustment to correct an immaterial error related to our income tax provision as of March 31, 2014.  We have restated our financial statements and related disclosures to correct the immaterial errors in each period presented.  

Concurrently with the filing of this Amendment, the Company is filing an amendment to its Annual Report on form 10-K and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.

Revisions to the Original Form 10-Q include the following:

(A) Amendments to Part I, Item 1 - Financial Statements, to reflect the restatement of our financial results.

Except as described in this Explanatory Note, the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and financial statement footnote disclosures in the original Form10-Q are unchanged. In particular, except for the events described above, this Amendment has not been updated to reflect any events that have occurred after the original Form 10-Q was filed or to modify or update disclosures affected by other subsequent events, except where required by GAAP. Accordingly, forward-looking statements included in this Amendment represent management’s views as of the Original Filing Date and should not be assumed to be accurate as of any date thereafter. This Amendment should be read in conjunction with the Company’s other filings with the SEC, together with any amendments to those filings.

 

 

 

 

 

2

---

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEM NUMBER AND CAPTION

 

 

 

 

3

---

 

INCONTACT, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS—(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

4

---

 

INCONTACT, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS and COMPREHENSIVE LOSS—(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

5

---

 

INCONTACT, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY—(Unaudited)

(in thousands)

 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

6

---

 

INCONTACT, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

(in thousands)

 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

7

---

 

INCONTACT, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Organization

inContact, Inc. (“inContact,” “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company”) is incorporated in the state of Delaware. We provide cloud contact center software solutions through our inContact^® portfolio, an advanced contact handling and performance management software application. Our services provide a variety of connectivity options for carrying inbound calls to our inContact portfolio or linking agents to our inContact applications. We provide customers the ability to monitor agent effectiveness through our user survey tools and the ability to efficiently monitor their agent needs. We are also an aggregator and provider of network connectivity services (formerly telecommunications). We contract with a number of third party providers for the right to resell the various network connectivity services and products they provide, and then offer all of these services to the customers. These services and products allow customers to buy only the network connectivity services they need, combine those services in a customized enhanced contact center package, receive one bill for those services, and call a single point of contact if a service problem or billing issue arises.

Basis of Presentation

These unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of inContact and its subsidiaries have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. Such rules and regulations allow the omission of certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, so long as the statements are not misleading. In the opinion of management, these financial statements and accompanying notes contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations for the periods presented herein. These Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated audited financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed with the SEC on November 14, 2014. The results of operations for the three month period ended March 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2014. Our significant accounting policies are set forth in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized when all of the following four criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (2) the fee is fixed or determinable, (3) collection is reasonably assured, and (4) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered.

Revenue is determined and recognized based on the type of service provided for the customer as follows:

8

---

 

Internal Use Software

We capitalize certain costs incurred for the development of internal use software which are included as internal use software in property and equipment in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. These costs include the costs associated with coding, software configuration, upgrades and enhancements that are incurred during the application development stage.

 

NOTE 2. RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Subsequent to the issuance of the Company’s first quarter 2014 Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, we determined that errors existed in the Company’s previously issued Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. As a result, the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been restated to correct for such errors, as described below.

Management’s decision to restate the aforementioned financial statements was made as a result of the identification of errors related to the calculation and assessment of state sales tax for certain of our products and services and the appropriate accounting for the related state sales tax obligations which cannot now be collected from customers due to the amount of time that has lapsed.

The principal effect of the restatement adjustments is to increase net loss by $340,000 and $264,000 (including increasing General and Administrative expense by the same amount) for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and increase accrued liabilities by the corresponding amount.

Additionally, the Company identified an error related to the March 31, 2014 tax provision.  The principal effect of the restatement adjustment is to decrease net loss by $8,000 (including decreasing income tax expense) and decrease income tax payable by the same amount for the three months ended March 31, 2014

The impact of the restatement adjustments on specific line items on the Company’s previously issued Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity as of March 31, 2014 and its Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss and Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 are presented below (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

 

9

---

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

The Company believes that the effects of these errors are not material to the previously issued Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

10

---

 

NOTE 3. ASSET ACQUISITION

In March 2013, we acquired technology for $1.9 million in cash, which we used to add mobile and social features in our existing applications. In April and June 2013, development earnout measures were achieved resulting in additional payments totaling $800,000. The value of the assets acquired was recorded as in process technology and is included in internal use software. In December 2013, we determined that $545,000 of the acquired technology would not be utilized in the foreseeable future and therefore was disposed.

 

NOTE 4. BASIC AND DILUTED NET (LOSS) INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing the net income or loss applicable to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing the net income or loss by the sum of the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding plus the weighted average common stock equivalents, which would have been outstanding if the potentially dilutive securities had been issued. Potentially dilutive securities include outstanding options and restricted stock. The dilutive effect of potentially dilutive securities is reflected in diluted earnings per common share by application of the treasury method.

As a result of incurring a net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, no potentially dilutive securities are included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share because such effect would be anti-dilutive. We had potentially dilutive securities representing approximately 3.9 million and 5.0 million shares of common stock at March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

 

NOTE 5. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The accounting guidance for fair value measurements defines fair value, establishes a market-based framework or hierarchy for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The guidance is applicable whenever assets and liabilities are measured and included in the financial statements at fair value. The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that could be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Financial assets are marked to bid prices and financial liabilities are marked to offer prices. Fair value measurements do not include transaction costs.  The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. Categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value hierarchy is defined into the following three categories:

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts reported in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for cash and cash equivalents, accounts and other receivables, and trade accounts payable approximate fair value because of the immediate or short-term maturities of these financial instruments and are considered to be classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, except for cash and cash equivalents which is Level 1. The fair values of the revolving credit note, promissory notes payable and term loans were computed using a discounted cash flow model using estimated market rates adjusted for our credit risk as of March 31, 2014 and 2013. We consider the input related to our credit risk to be within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy due to the limited number of our debt holders and our inability to observe current market information. We estimated our current credit risk as of March 31, 2014 and 2013 based on recent transactions with our creditors. The carrying value and estimated fair value of our revolving credit note, promissory notes payable and term loans are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

NOTE 6. ACQUISITION OF A BUSINESS

In December 2012, we entered into an agreement with Transcend Products LLC (“Transcend”) pertaining to the potential acquisition of Transcend to provide enhanced functionality for our existing service offerings. The option to purchase Transcend was exercised and the purchase closed in July 2013 for $2.7 million in cash and 376,459 shares of our common stock valued at $2.9 million, which was

11

---

 

discounted from $3.0 million in the purchase agreement for the lack of marketability. Furthermore, if the acquisition generates certain levels of revenue during the two-year period beginning in August 2013, we will pay to Transcend an additional earnout payment of $1.0 million in cash or shares of our common stock. As of the date of acquisition, this contingent liability has been recorded in accrued liabilities at its fair market value of $145,000 and was included as part of the purchase consideration.  At March 31, 2014, the fair market value remained unchanged.

The purchase price allocations for our acquisition of Transcend Products were prepared by the Company’s management utilizing a valuation report, which was prepared in accordance with the provisions of ASC 805 Business Combination, and other tools available to the Company, including conversations with Transcend’s management and projections of revenues and expenses. The fair values of the intangible assets were determined primarily using the income approach and the discount rates range from 13.4% to 16.4%. The total purchase price, which includes the contingent consideration liability above, was preliminarily allocated as follows (in thousands):

 

In connection with the acquisition, we incurred professional fees of $23,000, including transaction costs such as legal and valuation services, which were expensed as incurred. These costs are included within general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The premium paid over the fair value of the net assets acquired in the purchase, or goodwill, was primarily attributed to buyer synergies and assembled workforce. All of the goodwill was assigned to the software segment.

Intangible assets acquired resulting from the acquisition include customer relationships, patents and technology, which are amortized on a straight-line basis. The following sets forth the intangible assets purchased as part of the Transcend acquisition and their economic useful life at the date of acquisition (in thousands, except useful life):

 

 

NOTE 7. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets consisted of the following (in thousands):

 

Amortization expense was $168,000 and $53,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively

Based on the recorded intangibles at March 31, 2014, estimated amortization expense is expected to be $493,000 during the remainder of 2014, $587,000 in 2015, $581,000 in 2016, $483,000 in 2017, $388,000 in 2018 and $1.2 million thereafter.

 

12

---

 

NOTE 8. ACCRUED LIABILITIES

Accrued liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

 

 

NOTE 9. DEBT AND CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS

Revolving Credit Agreement

On July 16, 2009, we entered into a revolving credit loan agreement (“Revolving Credit Agreement”) with Zions, which was subsequently amended in June 2013. Under the terms of the Revolving Credit Agreement, Zions agreed to loan up to $15.0 million. The Revolving Credit Agreement is collateralized by substantially all the assets of inContact. The balance outstanding under the Revolving Credit Agreement cannot exceed the lesser of (a) $15.0 million or (b) the sum of 85% of eligible billed receivables, and 65% of eligible earned, but unbilled receivables as calculated on the 5th and 20th of each month. The interest rate on the Revolving Credit Agreement with Zions is 4.0% per annum above the ninety day LIBOR and the term is until July 2015.  There was $15.0 million of unused commitment at March 31, 2014, based on the maximum available advance amount calculated on the March 20, 2014 borrowing base certificate. Interest under the Revolving Credit Agreement is paid monthly in arrears, and any outstanding principal is due in July 2015.  There was no outstanding balance on our Revolving Credit Agreement at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

The Zions Revolving Credit Agreement contains certain covenants, which were established by amendment to the Revolving Credit Agreement in June 2013. As of March 31, 2014, the most significant covenants require that the aggregate value of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities shall not be less than the outstanding balance on the Revolving Credit Agreement plus $2.5 million, and if at any time the aggregate value is less than the minimum liquidity position, a minimum quarterly EBITDA of $2.5 million, calculated as of the last day of each calendar quarter, is required. We are in compliance with the covenants at March 31, 2014.

The Revolving Credit Agreement imposes certain restrictions on inContact’s ability, without the approval of Zions, to incur additional debt, make distributions to stockholders, or acquire other businesses or assets.

Promissory Note

During the three months ended March 31, 2014, we paid $208,000 of the promissory note payable (“Promissory Note”) to Zions. The Promissory Note balance was $486,000 at March 31, 2014.

Term Loan

In April 2012, we entered into a term loan agreement (“2012 Term Loan”) with Zions for $4.0 million, which matures in May 2016. We drew $4.0 million on the 2012 Term Loan in April 2013. Interest is paid monthly in arrears and the principal is paid in 36 equal monthly installments and commenced in September 2013. The interest rate under the Term Loan is 4.5% per annum above the ninety day LIBOR  rate, adjusted as of the date of any change in the ninety day LIBOR. The financial covenants are the same as the Revolving Credit Agreement.

In June 2013, we also entered into a term loan agreement (“2013 Term Loan”) with Zions for $4.0 million, which matures in June 2017.  We are allowed to draw on the 2013 Term Loan through June 2014 and the interest rate is 4.25% per annum above the ninety day LIBOR.  We drew $3.0 million on the 2013 Term Loan in December 2013. The principal will be paid in 36 equal monthly installments commencing in August 2014 and we may prepay any portion of the 2013 Term Loan without penalty or premium.  The 2013 Term Loan is collateralized by the same assets as the Revolving Credit Agreement.  

During the three months ended March 31, 2014, we paid $333,000 of total term loan principal to Zions. The total term loan balance was $5.9 million at March 31, 2014.

13

---

 

Capital Leases

During the three months ended March 31, 2014, we paid $269,000 of capital lease obligations. The balance of the capital lease obligations was $916,000 at March 31, 2014.

 

NOTE 10. CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS

During the three months ended March 31, 2014, we received 52,000 shares of our common stock from cancelled restricted stock from terminated employees and for the settlement of $24,000 in payroll taxes.

We received proceeds of $1.2 million from the exercise of 383,000 options during the three months ended March 31, 2014. We issued 25,000 shares of common stock for proceeds of $168,000 under the employee stock purchase plan during the three month period ended March 31, 2014.

 

NOTE 11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

In May 2009, the Company was served in a lawsuit titled California College, Inc., et al., v. UCN, Inc., et al. In the lawsuit, California College alleges that (1) the Company made fraudulent and/or negligent misrepresentations in connection with the sale of its services with those of Insidesales.com, Inc., another defendant in the lawsuit, (2) that the Company breached its service contract with California College and an alleged oral contract between the parties by failing to deliver contracted services and product and failing to abide by implied covenants of good faith and fair dealing, and (3) the conduct of the Company interfered with prospective economic business relations of California College with respect to enrolling students.  Pursuant to a motion filed by Insidesales.com, California College filed an amended complaint that has been answered by Insidesales.com and the Company.  California College originally sought damages in excess of $20.0 million.  Furthermore, Insidesales.com and the Company filed cross-claims against one another, which they subsequently agreed to dismiss with prejudice.  In October 2011, California College reached a settlement with Insidesales.com, the terms of which have not been disclosed and remain confidential.  In June of 2013, California College amended its damages claim to $14.4 million, of which approximately $5.0 million was alleged pre-judgment interest. On September 10, 2013, the court issued an order on the Company's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.  The court determined that factual disputes exist as to several of the claims, but dismissed California College's cause of action for intentional interference with prospective economic relations and the claim for prejudgment interest.  Dismissing the claim for prejudgment interest effectively reduced the claim for damages to approximately $9.2 million.  inContact has denied all of the substantive allegations of the complaint and continues to defend the claims.  Management believes the claims against the Company are without merit.   The Company does not believe the probable loss is material.

On January 15, 2014, Microlog Corporation (“Microlog”) filed a patent infringement suit against the Company in the Federal District Court for the District of Delaware.  The Complaint alleges that the Company has infringed a patent owned by Microlog.  The Company is defending this case vigorously and Management believes the allegations to be without merit.  However, no estimate of the loss or range of loss can be made.

On March 20, 2014, Pragmatus Telecom, LLC (“Pragmatus”) filed a patent infringement suit against inContact in the Federal District Court for the District of Delaware.  The Complaint alleges that inContact has infringed a patent owned by Pragmatus.  inContact is defending this case vigorously and Management believes the allegations to be without merit.  However, no estimate of the loss or range of loss can be made.

On May 2, 2014, Info Directions, Inc. (“IDI”) notified inContact of a Demand for Arbitration regarding a dispute related to the Software as a Service Agreement between IDI and inContact dated December 19, 2012 (“Agreement”) pursuant to which IDI was to provide inContact with billing systems software.  On April 8, 2014 InContact gave IDI notice of IDI breach of the Agreement.  inContact is defending this arbitration vigorously and Management believes the allegations to be without merit.  However, no estimate of the loss or range of loss can be made.

We are the subject of certain other legal matters considered incidental to our business activities. It is the opinion of management that the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material impact on our financial position, liquidity or results of operations.

 

NOTE 12. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award granted and recognized as expense using the graded-vesting method over the period in which the award is expected to vest. Stock-based compensation expense recognized during a period is based on the value of the portion of stock-based awards that is ultimately expected to vest during the period. As stock-based compensation expense recognized in the results for the year is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures.

14

---

 

We record stock-based compensation expense (including stock options, restricted stock and employee stock purchase plan) to the same departments where cash compensation is recorded as follows (in thousands):

 

We utilize the Black-Scholes model to determine the estimated fair value for grants of stock options. The Black-Scholes model requires the use of highly subjective and complex assumptions to determine the fair value of stock-based awards, including the option’s expected term, expected dividend yield, the risk-free interest rate and the price volatility of the underlying stock. The expected dividend yield is based on our historical dividend rates. Risk-free interest rates are based on U.S. treasury rates. Volatility is based on historical stock prices over a period equal to the estimated life of the option. Stock options are issued at the current market price on the date of grant and prior to December 31, 2013 were generally subject to a three-year vesting period with a contractual term of five years. Stock options issued subsequent to December 31, 2013 are generally subject to a four-year vesting period with a contractual term of ten years.

The grant date fair value of the restricted stock is calculated using the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date, with the compensation expense amortized over the vesting period of the restricted stock awards, net of estimated forfeitures.

We estimate the fair value of options granted under our employee stock-based compensation arrangements at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model using the following weighted-average assumptions as follows:

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2014, we granted 920,000 stock options with exercise prices ranging from $8.02 to $10.19 and a weighted-average fair value of $5.06 and 293,000 restricted stock awards with a weighted-average fair value of $8.87.

As of March 31, 2014, there was $6.6 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock-based compensation awards granted under our stock-based compensation plans. The compensation cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.2 years.

In November 2013, our Chief Executive Officer had 398,505 options expire where the Company’s stock price exceeded the exercise price of the options. Also in November 2013, our Compensation Committee awarded 232,868 shares of restricted stock to our Chief Executive Officer. These transactions were accounted for as a modification and did not result in any additional fair market value because the market value of the restricted stock awarded approximated the market value of the expired options.

 

NOTE 13. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On February 13, 2013, we amended the Unify, Inc. (“Unify”) (formerly Siemens Enterprise Communications) reseller agreement which modified Unify’s minimum purchase commitments to be $4.5 million for 2012, $7.0 million for 2013 and extended the minimum purchase commitment obligation into 2014 in the amount of up to $5.0 million, which may be credited up to $1.0 million in 2014 in consideration for up to a $1.0 million investment by Unify in sales and marketing of our cloud contact center software solutions. Under the amendment Unify relinquished exclusivity in Europe, the Middle East and Asia (“EMEA”). Additionally, sales made by other resellers and inContact in EMEA will go toward satisfying Unify’s minimum purchase commitment obligation.

15

---

 

In February 2013, we agreed that through 2013, Unify could make payment of its obligations with shares of our common stock held by Unify’s parent company at a price per share, discounted 9.0% from the volume weighted average price, averaged over a specified period of five trading days prior to the payment date. $2.7 million in revenue earned from Unify during 2012 was paid by the delivery of 492,000 shares of our common stock by Unify in 2013. In May 2013, the parent company of Unify sold its remaining 6.4 million shares of our common stock in the open market. Accordingly, future payments by Unify under the reseller agreement will be in cash. In that regard, Unify paid to inContact a total of $3.5 million in May 2013, which was applied to outstanding amounts owed and the minimum commitment payment obligations of Unify under the reseller agreement through March 31, 2014. There was no unapplied balance of the $3.5 million payment at March 31, 2014.

Under this arrangement, we recognized software revenue of $1.7 million during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and $1.7 million during three months ended March 31, 2013, which included revenue from resold software services and amounts up to the quarterly minimum revenue purchase commitments. Under the arrangement, revenue from resold software services reduces the reseller’s obligation up to the amount of the quarterly minimum purchase commitments.

As of March 31, 2014, Unify continues to resell our software services and has met its obligations under the revised reseller agreement; however, we believe that resold recurring software revenue will not meet the final quarterly gross minimum purchase commitment of $1.5 million in the third quarter of 2014.

We paid the Chairman of the Board of Directors (the “Chairman”) $7,000 per month during the three months ended March 31, 2014, and 2013 for consulting, marketing and capital raising activities. We owed the Chairman $7,000 at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

 

NOTE 14. SEGMENTS

We operate under two business segments: Software and Network connectivity. The Software segment includes all monthly recurring revenue related to the delivery of our software applications, plus the associated professional services and setup fees, and revenue related to quarterly minimum purchase commitments, from a related party reseller (Note 13). The Network connectivity segment includes all voice and data long distance services provided to customers.

Management evaluates segment performance based on operating data (revenue, costs of revenue, and other operating expenses). Management does not evaluate and manage segment performance based on assets.

For segment reporting, we classify operating expenses as either “direct” or “indirect.” Direct expense refers to costs attributable solely to either selling and marketing efforts or research and development efforts. Indirect expense refers to costs that management considers to be overhead in running the business. In evaluating segment performance, management evaluates expenditures for both selling and marketing and research and development efforts at the segment level without the allocation of overhead expenses, such as rent, utilities and depreciation on property and equipment.

Operating segment revenues and profitability for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows (in thousands, except percentages):

 

 

16

---

 

NOTE 15. SUBSEQUENT EVENT

On May 6, 2014, we acquired CallCopy, Inc., a Delaware corporation doing business as Uptivity (“Uptivity”).  Uptivity provides a complete mid-market workforce optimization suite of services to call centers comprised of speech and desktop analytics, agent coaching, call and desktop recording, as well as quality, performance, workforce management and satisfaction surveys. There were no material relationships between inContact and any of the stockholders of Uptivity prior to the acquisition.

The purchase price was approximately $50.2 million, including Uptivity’s unaudited adjusted net current assets of approximately $5.8 million as of the closing date, which was estimated for purposes of closing and subject to adjustment in certain circumstances and verification in a final closing balance sheet for Uptivity.  The purchase price was paid with cash in the amount of $14.6 million and 4,256,244 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $35.6 million.

 

 

 

17

---

 

The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the audited December 31, 2013 Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto, along with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The MD&A gives effect to the restatement of prior period Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements referred to in Note 2—“Restatement of Financial Statements” to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Part I, Item 1.

This document contains statements that are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, which address activities, actions, goals, prospects, or new developments that we expect or anticipate will or may occur in the future, including such things as expansion and growth of our operations and other such matters are forward-looking statements. Any one or a combination of factors could materially affect our operations and financial condition. These factors include competitive pressures, success or failure of marketing programs, changes in pricing and availability of services and products offered to customers, legal and regulatory initiatives affecting software or long distance service, and conditions in the capital markets. Forward-looking statements made by us are based on knowledge of our business and the environment in which we operate as of the date of this report. Because of the factors discussed in our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A under Item 1A “Risk Factors,” and factors disclosed in subsequent reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, actual results may differ from those in the forward-looking statements.

OVERVIEW

inContact began in 1997 as a reseller of network connectivity services and has evolved to become a leading provider of cloud contact center software solutions. We help contact centers around the world create effective customer experiences through our powerful portfolio of cloud contact center contact routing, self-service and agent optimization software solutions. Our services and software solutions enable contact centers to operate more efficiently, optimize the cost and quality of every customer interaction, create new pathways to profit and ensure ongoing customer-centric business improvement and growth.

We began offering cloud solutions to the contact center market in 2005. Our dynamic technology platform provides our customers a pay-as-you-go solution without the costs and complexities of premise-based systems. Our proven cloud delivery model provides compelling total cost of ownership savings over premise-based technology by reducing upfront capital expenditures, eliminating the expense of system management and maintenance fees, while providing agility that enables businesses to scale their technology as they grow.

DEVELOPMENTS

On May 6, 2014, we acquired CallCopy, Inc., a Delaware corporation doing business as Uptivity (“Uptivity”).  Uptivity provides a complete mid-market workforce optimization suite of services to call centers comprised of speech and desktop analytics, agent coaching, call and desktop recording, as well as quality, performance, workforce management and satisfaction surveys. There were no material relationships between inContact and any of the stockholders of Uptivity prior to the acquisition.

The purchase price was approximately $50.2 million, including Uptivity’s unaudited adjusted net current assets of approximately $5.8 million as of the closing date, which was estimated for purposes of closing and subject to adjustment in certain circumstances and verification in a final closing balance sheet for Uptivity.  The purchase price was paid with cash in the amount of $14.6 million and 4,256,244 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $35.6 million.

SOURCES OF REVENUE

We derive our revenues from two major business activities: (1) delivery and support of our inContact portfolio of software solutions and associated professional services and (2) reselling network connectivity services. Our primary business focus is marketing and selling our inContact portfolio.

18

---

 

Software

Software delivery and support of our inContact portfolio is provided on a monthly recurring subscription basis. Monthly recurring charges are billed in arrears and recognized for the period in which they are earned. In addition to the monthly recurring revenue, revenue is also received on a non-recurring basis for professional implementation services or on a recurring basis related to improving a customer’s contact center efficiency and effectiveness metrics, as it relates to utilization of the inContact portfolio. Customers access cloud software and data through a secure Internet connection. Support services include technical assistance for our software products and product upgrades and enhancements on a when and if available basis. Our network connectivity and data network is fundamental to our inContact portfolio and allows us to provide the all-in-one inContact solution. Software service revenue also includes revenue related to minimum purchase commitments through July 2014, from a related party reseller referred to in Part I. Item 1 “Financial Statements” – Note 13 – Related Party Transactions.”

Network Connectivity

We derive revenue from network connectivity services such as dedicated transport, VoIP connectivity, switched long distance and data services. These services are provided over our network or through third party network connectivity providers. Revenue for transactional network connectivity usage is derived based on customer specific rate plans and the customer’s call usage and is recognized in the period the call is initiated. Customers are billed monthly charges in arrears and revenue is recognized for such charges over the billing period. If the billing period spans more than one month, earned but unbilled revenues are recognized as revenue for incurred usage to date.

COSTS OF REVENUE AND OPERATING EXPENSES

Costs of Revenue

Costs of revenue consist primarily of payments to third party long distance service providers for resold network connectivity services to our customers. Costs of revenue also include labor costs (including stock-based compensation) and related expenses for our software services delivery, professional services and customer support organizations, equipment depreciation relating to our services, amortization of acquired intangible assets, amortization of capitalized internal use software development costs, and allocated overhead, such as rent, utilities and depreciation on property and equipment. As a result, overhead expenses are included in costs of revenue and each operating expense category. The cost associated with providing professional services is significantly higher as a percentage of revenue than the cost associated with delivering our software services due to the labor costs associated with providing professional services. We anticipate that we will incur additional costs for network connectivity service providers, hosting, support, labor costs and related expenses, to support delivery of our software solutions and services in the future.

Selling and Marketing

Selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of labor costs (including stock-based compensation) and related expenses for employees in sales and marketing, including commissions and bonuses, advertising, marketing events, corporate communications, expenses, travel costs and allocated overhead. Since our Software segment revenue is delivered and therefore recognized over time, we have experienced a delay between increasing sales and marketing expenses and the recognition of the corresponding revenue. We believe it is important to continue investing in selling and marketing to create brand awareness and lead generation opportunities, to increase market share and to support the resellers channels. Accordingly, we expect selling and marketing expenses to increase in absolute dollars as we continue to support growth initiatives.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses consist primarily of the non-capitalized portion of labor costs (including stock-based compensation) and related expenses for development personnel and costs related to the development of new products, enhancement of existing products, quality assurance, market research, testing, product management and allocated overhead. We expect research and development expenses to increase in absolute dollars in the future as we intend to release new features and functionality on a frequent basis, expand our content offerings, upgrade and extend our service offerings and develop new technologies.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of labor costs (including stock-based compensation) and related expenses for management, finance and accounting, legal, information systems and human resources personnel, professional fees, other corporate expenses and allocated overhead. We anticipate that we will incur additional employee salaries and related expenses, professional service fees and other corporate expenses related to the growth of our business and operations in the future. As such, we expect general and administrative expenses to increase in absolute dollars.

19

---

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013

The following is a tabular presentation of our condensed consolidated operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to our condensed consolidated operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2013 (in thousands, except percentages):

 

Revenue

Total revenues increased $5.4 million or 17% to $37.1 million during the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to revenues of $31.6 million during the same period in 2013. The increase relates to an increase of $3.8 million in Software segment revenue due to continued focus and investment in selling and marketing efforts of our inContact portfolio of cloud contact center solutions through our direct sales and referral and reseller partner arrangements and revenue related to minimum purchase commitments from a reseller. Network connectivity segment revenue increased $1.6 million as the increase of Network connectivity revenue associated with our inContact portfolio customers exceeded the attrition of our Network connectivity only customers.

We recognized $1.7 million of software revenue during the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to $1.7 million during the same period in 2013, under our reseller agreement with Unify, which principally represents revenue from Unify’s minimum purchase commitments. Under the arrangement, revenue from resold software services reduces Unify’s obligation up to the amount of the quarterly minimum purchase commitments. These minimum purchase commitments were negotiated, in part to mitigate the risks associated with the investment in infrastructure to support our expanded reseller sales and marketing efforts initiated in 2011 and expire in the third quarter of 2014. As of March 31, 2014, Unify continues to resell our software services and has met its obligations under the revised reseller agreement; however, we believe revenue from resold software services will not meet the gross minimum purchase commitment in the third quarter of 2014. Therefore, we anticipate a reduction in software revenue from that reseller beginning in the fourth quarter of 2014 to the extent the revenue from resold software services is less than the minimum purchase commitment in the third quarter of 2014.

Costs of revenue and gross margin

Costs of revenue increased $2.6 million or 16% to $19.1 million during the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to $16.5 million for the same period in 2013. Gross margin increased 1 percentage points to 49% for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to 48% for the same period in 2013. The increase in revenue from our inContact portfolio and the minimum purchase commitment offset increased costs attributable to greater professional service personnel costs incurred to service larger mid-market and enterprise customers and to support resellers, international infrastructure investments initiated in 2011 and increased amortization of previously capitalized software development costs. In addition, lower network connectivity costs due to increased efficiencies in call routing related to a continued investment in technology and lower negotiated direct costs contributed to the gross margin increase.

20

---

 

Selling and marketing

Selling and marketing expenses increased $1.6 million or 19% to $10.1 million during the three months ended March 31, 2014 from $8.4 million for the same period in 2013. This increase is primarily a result of headcount additions for direct and channel sales employees, increased commissions as a result of increased revenue and headcount, and to a lesser extent, higher levels of investment in marketing efforts to create increased awareness of our services as well as increased lead generation efforts for our Software segment.

Research and development

Research and development expense increased $989,000 or 36% to $3.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2014 from $2.8 million during the same period in 2013. The increase relates to our efforts to expand our content offerings, upgrade and extend our service offerings and develop new technologies primarily through headcount additions.

General and administrative

General and administrative expense increased $299,000 or 6% to $5.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to $5.3 million during the same period in 2013. The increase is primarily due to increased costs incurred to support our domestic and international business expansion.

Other expense

Other expense increased $177,000 to $262,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2014 from $85,000 for the same period in 2013. The difference is primarily due to an increase in the amount interest expense in the first quarter of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013 related to a higher average balance on our term loans.

Income taxes

Income taxes, which consist of various state income taxes and foreign taxes, remained consistent for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to the same period in 2013.

SEGMENT REPORTING

We operate under two business segments: Software and Network connectivity. The Software segment includes all monthly recurring revenue related to the delivery of our software solutions plus the associated professional services and setup fees and revenue related to quarterly minimum purchase commitments from Unify through July 2014. The Network connectivity segment includes all voice and data long distance services provided to customers.

Management evaluates segment performance based on operating data (revenue, costs of revenue, and other operating expenses). Management does not evaluate and manage segment performance based on assets.

For segment reporting, we classify operating expenses as either “direct” or “indirect.” Direct expense refers to costs attributable solely to either selling and marketing efforts or research and development efforts. Indirect expense refers to costs that management considers to be overhead in running the business. Management evaluates expenditures for both selling and marketing and research and development efforts at the segment level without the allocation of overhead expenses, such as compensation, rent, utilities and depreciation on property and equipment.

21

---

 

Software Segment Results

The following is a tabular presentation and comparison of our Software segment unaudited condensed consolidated operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands, except percentages):

 

Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013

The Software segment revenue increased by $3.8 million or 24% to $20.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2014 from $16.2 million for the same period in 2013. The increase relates primarily to revenue generated from our inContact portfolio of cloud contact center solutions and is due to our continued focus and investment in sales and marketing through our direct sales and referral and reseller partner arrangements.

We recognized $1.7 million of software revenue during the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to $1.7 million during the same period in 2013, under our reseller agreement with Unify, which principally represents revenue from Unify’s minimum purchase commitments. Under the arrangement, revenue from resold software services reduces Unify’s obligation up to the amount of the quarterly minimum purchase commitments. These minimum purchase commitments were negotiated, in part to mitigate the risks associated with the investment in infrastructure to support our expanded reseller sales and marketing efforts initiated in 2011 and expire at the end of July 2014. We believe that resold recurring software revenue will not meet the final quarterly gross minimum purchase commitment of $1.5 million in the third quarter of 2014 and there will be a reduction in software revenue from that reseller beginning in August 2014 to the extent the revenue from resold software services is less than the minimum purchase commitment at the end of July 2014.

Gross margin decreased 1 percentage point to 59% for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to 60% for the same period in 2013. This decrease is largely a result of increased costs attributable to greater professional service costs incurred to service larger mid-market and enterprise customers and to support resellers, increased amortization of previously capitalized software development costs and amortization of intangibles purchased as a part of the Transcend acquisition.

Direct selling and marketing expenses in the Software segment increased $1.9 million or 27% to $8.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to $7.0 million for the same period in 2013. This increase is a result of headcount additions for direct and channel sales employees and employees focused on managing and enhancing our partner relationships and higher levels of investment in marketing efforts to create increased awareness of our inContact portfolio of cloud contact center solutions.

We also continue to develop the software applications and services provided in the Software segment by investing in research and development. During the three months ended March 31, 2014, we incurred $3.5 million in direct research and development costs compared to $2.5 million for the same period in 2013 and have capitalized an additional $2.3 million of costs incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2014 related to our internally developed software compared to $1.5 million for the same period in 2013.

Indirect expenses, which consist of overhead, such as allocated general and administrative expenses, rent, utilities and depreciation on property and equipment, increased $555,000 or 11% to $5.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2014 from $4.9 million for the same period in 2013 due to more indirect costs being allocated to the Software segment with the continued shift in revenue and direct expense mix from the Network connectivity segment to the Software segment and the general increase in indirect expenses.

22

---

 

Network Connectivity Segment Results

The following is a tabular presentation and comparison of our Network connectivity segment condensed consolidated operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands, except percentages):

 

Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013

Network connectivity segment revenue increased $1.6 million or 10% to $17.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to $15.5 million for the same period in 2013 due to the increase of network connectivity revenue associated with our inContact portfolio customers exceeding the attrition of our Network connectivity only customers. Our costs of revenue increased 8% due to the increase in revenue and Network connectivity gross margin increased 1% due to increased efficiencies in call routing related to a continued investment in technology and lower negotiated direct costs. Selling and marketing expenses decreased $235,000 or 24% during the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period in 2013, primarily due to a decrease in employees commissions from connectivity product sales. Indirect expenses, which consist of overhead, such as allocated general and administrative expense, rent, utilities and depreciation on property and equipment decreased $183,000 or 17% during the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to the same period in 2013 as a result of a decrease in compliance related activities.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Current Financial Condition

Our principal sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, cash available to draw under a term loan agreement (“2013 Term Loan”) and available borrowings under our Revolving Credit Agreement, which expires in July 2015. At March 31, 2014, we had $44.7 million of cash and cash equivalents. In addition to our $44.7 million of cash and cash equivalents, we have access to additional available borrowings under our Revolving Credit Agreement with Zions, subject to meeting our covenant requirements, and our 2013 Term Loan with Zions. The available borrowings under the Revolving Credit Agreement at March 31, 2014 were $15.0 million, based on the maximum available advance amount calculated on the March 20, 2014 borrowing base certificate. The available borrowings under the 2013 Term Loan at March 31, 2014 was $1.0 million. Total cash and additional availability under the Revolving Credit Agreement and 2013 Term Loan was $60.7 million at March 31, 2014. The Revolving Credit Agreement is collateralized by substantially all our assets.

We experienced a net loss of $1.7 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2014. Significant non-cash expenses affecting operations during the first quarter of 2014 were $3.2 million of depreciation and amortization and $1.0 million of stock-based compensation. The non-cash expenses were partially offset by decreases from accounts receivable, other assets and accrued liabilities resulting in $418,000 of cash from operating activities during the first quarter of 2014.

We continue to take a proactive approach in managing our operating expenditures and cash flow from operations. We expect to rely on internally generated cash, our Revolving Credit Agreement and our 2013 Term Loan to finance operations and capital requirements. We believe that existing cash and cash equivalents, cash from operations, available borrowings under our Revolving Credit Agreement and available borrowings under our 2013 Term Loan will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements during the next twelve months.

23

---

 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

A summary of our significant accounting policies and estimates is discussed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in Note 1 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013. The preparation of the financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make judgments, estimates and assumptions regarding uncertainties that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities. Significant areas of uncertainty that require judgments, estimates and assumptions include the accounting for income taxes and other contingencies as well as asset impairment and collectability of accounts receivable. We use historical and other information that we consider to be relevant to make these judgments and estimates. However, actual results may differ from those estimates and assumptions that are used to prepare our financial statements.

 

Our cash and cash equivalents are invested with high-quality issuers and limit the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer. Due to the short-term nature of the cash equivalents, we believe that we are not subject to any material interest rate risk as it relates to interest income.

Interest rates on our term loan and revolving credit agreement are variable so market fluctuations in interest rate may increase our interest expense.

 

In connection with the filing of the Original Form 10-Q, management, under the supervision of and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d- 15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), as of the period covered by our Original Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2014. Based on such evaluation, management concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Subsequent to that evaluation, in connection with the restatement discussed in Note 2 — “Restatement of Financial Statements” to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, management re-evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2014 and concluded that, solely because of the material weakness identified in our internal control over financial reporting disclosed below, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of March 31, 2014.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Management identified a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of 2014. The Company’s controls were not properly designed related to the calculation and assessment of state sales tax for certain of our products and services and the appropriate accounting for the related state sales tax obligations.

We are in the process of implementing a new billing system and a new tax vendor to ensure that tax rates are accurate and updated timely.  We are also implementing new controls related to training our billing team and testing the tax outputs of the billing system. Management believes these initiatives will remediate the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting described above. The Company will test the ongoing operating effectiveness of the new controls in future periods. The material weakness cannot be considered remediated until the applicable remedial controls operate for a sufficient period of time and management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively.

As the identification of the above material weakness did not occur until the fourth quarter of 2014, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

 

 

24

---

 

PART II

 

In May 2009, inContact was served in a lawsuit titled California College, Inc., et al., v. UCN, Inc., et al. In the lawsuit, California College alleges that (1) inContact made fraudulent and/or negligent misrepresentations in connection with the sale of its services with those of Insidesales.com, Inc., another defendant in the lawsuit, (2) that inContact breached its service contract with California College and an alleged oral contract between the parties by failing to deliver contracted services and product and failing to abide by implied covenants of good faith and fair dealing, and (3) the conduct of inContact interfered with prospective economic business relations of California College with respect to enrolling students.  Pursuant to a motion filed by Insidesales.com, California College filed an amended complaint that has been answered by Insidesales.com and inContact.  California College originally sought damages in excess of $20.0 million.  Furthermore, Insidesales.com and inContact filed cross-claims against one another, which they subsequently agreed to dismiss with prejudice.  In October 2011, California College reached a settlement with Insidesales.com, the terms of which have not been disclosed and remain confidential.  In June of 2013, California College amended its damages claim to $14.4 million, of which approximately $5.0 million was alleged pre-judgment interest. On September 10, 2013, the court issued an order on inContact's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.  The court determined that factual disputes exist as to several of the claims, but dismissed California College's cause of action for intentional interference with prospective economic relations and the claim for prejudgment interest.  Dismissing the claim for prejudgment interest effectively reduced the claim for damages to approximately $9.2 million.  inContact has denied all of the substantive allegations of the complaint and continues to defend the claims.  Management believes the claims against inContact are without merit.  The Company does not believe the probable loss is material.

On January 15, 2014, Microlog Corporation (“Microlog”) filed a patent infringement suit against inContact in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Case No. 1:99-mc-09999, alleging that we are infringing one or more claims made in U.S. Patent No. 7,092,509 (the “’509 Patent”), entitled “Contact Center System Capable of Handling Multiple Media Types of Contacts and Method for Using the Same.”  Microlog is seeking a declaratory judgment, injunctive relief, damages and an ongoing royalty, and costs, including attorney’s fees and expenses.  We are at the very early stages of this lawsuit and presently intend to defend the claims vigorously.

On March 20, 2014, Pragmatus Telecom, LLC (“Pragmatus”) filed a patent infringement suit against inContact in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Case No. 14-360, alleging that we are infringing one or more claims made in U.S. Patent No. 6,311,231 (the “’231 Patent”), entitled “Method and System for Coordinating Data and Voice Communications Via Customer Contact Channel Changing System Using Voice over IP”; U.S. Patent No. 6,668,286 (the “’286 Patent”), entitled “Method and System for Coordinating Data and Voice Communications Via Customer Contact Channel Changing System Using Voice over IP”; U.S. Patent No. 7,159,043 (the “’043 Patent”), entitled “Method and System for Coordinating Data and Voice Communications Via Customer Contact Channel Changing System”; and U.S. Patent No. 8,438,314 (the “’314 Patent”), entitled “Method and System for Coordinating Data and Voice Communications Via Customer Contract Channel Changing System”. Pragmatus is seeking a declaratory judgment, injunctive relief, damages and costs, including attorney’s fees and expenses.  We are at the very early stages of this lawsuit and presently intend to defend the claims vigorously.

On May 2, 2014, Info Directions, Inc. (“IDI”) notified inContact of a Demand for Arbitration regarding a dispute related to the Software as a Service Agreement between IDI and inContact dated December 19, 2012 (“Agreement”) pursuant to which IDI was to provide inContact with billing systems software.  On April 8, 2014 InContact gave IDI notice of IDI breach of the Agreement.  inContact is defending this arbitration vigorously and Management believes the allegations to be without merit.  However, no estimate of the loss or range of loss can be made.

We are the subject of certain legal matters, which we consider incidental to our business activities. It is the opinion of management that the ultimate disposition of these other matters will not have a material impact on our financial position, liquidity or results of operations.

 

25

---

 

Our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, as well as other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, contain discussions of risks we believe to be significant with respect to our business, operations, financial condition, and other matters pertaining to our business and an investment in our common stock.  Before deciding to purchase, hold or sell our common stock, you should carefully consider the risks presented in those filings and the additional risks described below.  The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face.  If any of these known or unknown risks or uncertainties actually occurs with material adverse effects, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be seriously harmed.  In that event, the market price for our common stock could decline.

A material weakness in internal control over financial reporting could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

As discussed in Part I, Item 4 - Controls and Procedures, we have identified a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of 2014. The Company’s controls were not properly designed related to the calculation and assessment of state sales tax for certain of our products and services and the appropriate accounting for the related state sales tax obligations.  A material weakness could result in a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements. A material misstatement would involve numerous risks, including the following:

Each of these risks described above could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

 

Repurchases of Securities

Stock repurchases for the three months ended March 31, 2014, were as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

 

26

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

27

---

 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

28