ASSETS March 31, December 31, 2001 2000 ------------------ ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- (Unaudited) Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ $ 613 3,291 Marketable securities 28,002 35,356 Accounts receivable 12,204 5,217 Prepaid expenses and other assets 1,503 722 ------------------ ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- Total current assets 42,322 44,586 Marketable securities, non-current 33,564 32,884 Property and equipment, net 8,119 8,910 Other assets 2,082 2,007 ------------------ ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- TOTAL ASSETS $ 86,087 $ 88,387 ================== ================= LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Current liabilities: Accounts payable $ $ 3,919 4,587 Other accrued liabilities 10,236 10,749 Deferred contract revenues 16,372 16,193 ------------------ ----------------- Total current liabilities 30,527 31,529 Long-term debt 39,944 39,095 ------------------ ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- Total liabilities 70,471 70,624 ------------------ ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- Stockholders' equity: Preferred stock; $.001 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized; 4,991 shares issued and outstanding -- -- Common stock; $.001 par value; 150,000,000 shares authorized; 39,364,224 and 39,166,373 shares issued and outstanding, respectively 39 39 Additional paid-in capital 430,408 428,987 Notes receivable from stockholders (406) (634) Deferred compensation, net (106) (417) Accumulated other comprehensive income 1,311 1,195 Accumulated deficit (415,630) (411,407) ------------------ ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- Total stockholders' equity 15,616 17,763 ------------------ ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 86,087 $ 88,387 ================== =================The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. SCIOS INC. AND SUBSIDIARY Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss (In thousands, except share and per share data)
Three months ended March 31, 2001 2000 ---------------- --------------- (Unaudited) Revenues: Product sales and co-promotion commissions, net of expenses $ $ 1,483 1,331 Research & development contracts 1,097 1,894 Gain on sale of marketing rights 9,363 -- ---------------- --------------- 11,943 3,225 ---------------- --------------- Costs and expenses: Research and development 9,480 9,284 Marketing, general and administration 6,480 3,476 ---------------- --------------- 15,960 12,760 ---------------- --------------- Loss from operations (9,535) (4,017) Other income (expense): Investment income 812 1,384 Interest expense (849) (991) Realized gains (losses) on securities (84) 254 Other expense (299) (423) ---------------- --------------- (206) 10 ---------------- --------------- Net loss (9,525) (4,223) ---------------- --------------- Other comprehensive loss: Change in unrealized gains (losses) on securities: (96) 116 ---------------- --------------- Comprehensive loss $ $ (4,107) (9,621) ================ =============== Loss per common share, basic and diluted $ $ (0.11) (0.25) Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in the calculation of net loss per share, basic and diluted 39,290,982 37,780,077The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
__________ SCIOS INC. AND SUBSIDIARY Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (In thousands)
Three months ended March 31, 2001 2000 ------------ ----------- (Unaudited) Cash flows from operating activities: Net loss $ (4,223) $ (9,525) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 872 978 Loss on disposal of property and equipment 365 -- Accrued long-term interest payable 849 991 Amortization of deferred compensation 311 85 Changes in assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable (6,987) (265) Accounts payable (668) 66 Other accrued liabilities (513) (846) Prepaid expenses and other assets (856) 779 Deferred contract revenue 179 (902) ------------ ----------- Net cash used in operating activities (10,671) (8,639) ------------ ----------- Cash flows from investing activities: Purchases of property and equipment (446) (628) Sales/maturities of marketable securities 43,371 6,738 Purchases of marketable securities (36,581) (2,933) ------------ ----------- Net cash provided by investing activities 6,344 3,177 ------------ ----------- Cash flows from financing activities: Issuance of common stock and collection of notes receivable from stockholders, net 1,649 594 Payment of notes payable -- (2,000) ------------ ----------- Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 1,649 (1,406) ------------ ----------- Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (2,678) (6,868) Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period 3,291 11,582 ------------ ----------- Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period $ 613 $ 4,714 ============ ===========The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Three months ended March 31, 2001 2000 --------------------------------------------------------- --------------- ---- --------------- Numerator Basic Net loss $ $ (9,525) (4,223) =============== ================ Diluted Net loss $ $ (9,525) (4,223) =============== ================ Denominator Basic and diluted Weighted average shares 39,290,982 37,780,077 Effect of dilutive securities: Employee stock options -- -- Weighted average shares and assumed conversions 39,290,982 37,780,077 =============== ================ Basic loss per share $ (0.11) $ (0.25) =============== ================ Diluted loss per share $ (0.11) $ (0.25) =============== ================The potentially dilutive effect of outstanding options to purchase common stock would have been anti-dilutive as to the reported loss per share in both 2001 and 2000, and they were therefore excluded from the diluted loss per share calculation for both periods. Although potentially dilutive, the optional settlement of the Genentech loan through the issuance of preferred stock would have been anti-dilutive in both 2001 and 2000 and was therefore excluded from the calculations. At March 31, 2001, Scios had 5,125,383 outstanding stock options at prices ranging from $3.6875 to $21.38 per share. At March 31, 2000, Scios had 5,368,560 outstanding stock options at prices ranging from $3.6875 to $21.13 per share. 3. Industry and Geographic Segment Information Scios operates in one business segment, using one measurement of profitability for its business. Scios receives revenue from product sales and from licensing and development of products from partners in the United States, Europe and Asia Pacific. At March 31, 2001, all long-lived assets were located in the United States and all revenues were earned in the United States in the three months ended March 31, 2001 and the three months ended March 31, 2000.
At March 31, 2001, we had notes receivable from three officers. The first note is in the amount of $179,466 with interest at 6.30% per annum, due and payable on October 31, 2001. The loan was granted in connection with the payment of income taxes for restricted stock granted to the officer. This loan is collateralized by the vested portion of the officers stock options and is classified with other current assets on the balance sheet at March 31, 2001. |
The second note is in the amount of $280,040 with interest at 5.18% per annum, due and payable on February 28, 2002. The loan was granted in connection with the payment of income taxes for restricted stock granted to the officer. This loan is collateralized by the vested portion of the officers stock options and is classified with other current assets on the balance sheet at March 31, 2001. |
The third note is in the amount of $33,333 with interest at 5.82% per annum. This loan will be forgiven over the next two years based on the continued employment of the officer and is collateralized by the officers residence. The loan was granted in connection with a housing subsidy for the officer to live in California. This note balance is classified with other assets on the balance sheet at March 31, 2001. |
If the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, finds that our amended New Drug Application, or NDA, for Natrecor® does not support approval for marketing, the commercialization of Natrecor® may be delayed or prevented.
In April 1999, the FDA issued us a non-approval letter for Natrecor(R). To address the FDA's concerns, we conducted a Phase III clinical trial; and in January 2001, we submitted an amendment to our NDA seeking approval to market Natrecor(R)in the United States. We are initially seeking FDA approval for use of Natrecor(R)as a treatment for acute congestive heart failure, or acute CHF. The FDA may not find our clinical data adequate to support Natrecor(R)as a treatment for acute CHF or any other disease. Moreover, the FDA may require us to commence and complete additional clinical trials to generate additional data to support product approval for the treatment of acute CHF, which may lead to a substantial delay in its approval of Natrecor(R)or prevent Natrecor(R)from being approved for any medical use. If Natrecor(R)does not gain market acceptance, our business will suffer. Even if clinical trials demonstrate the safety and efficacy of Natrecor(R)and the necessary regulatory approvals are obtained, Natrecor(R)may not gain market acceptance among physicians, patients, healthcare payors and the medical community. We will need to educate doctors and other healthcare advisors of the safety and clinical efficacy of Natrecor(R)and its potential advantages over other treatments. The degree of market acceptance of Natrecor(R)will also depend on a number of factors, including: o the degree of clinical efficacy and safety; o cost-effectiveness of Natrecor(R); o its advantage over alternative treatment methods; and o reimbursement policies of government and third-party payors. To the extent market acceptance of Natrecor(R)is limited, our revenues may suffer.If the FDA determines that our third-party manufacturing facilities are not adequate, either before or after receipt of FDA marketing approval, we may lose the ability to manufacture and sell Natrecor®.
As part of the NDA approval process and periodically thereafter, the FDA is likely to inspect each of the facilities involved in manufacturing Natrecor(R). Natrecor(R)is manufactured for us by Biochemie GmbH, a subsidiary of Novartis, in Austria and is shipped in powder form to Abbott Laboratories in McPherson, Kansas where it is blended, filled and packaged for shipment. Although each facility has previously passed FDA inspections, future inspections may find deficiencies in the facilities or processes that may delay or prevent the manufacture or sale of Natrecor(R). Even if the FDA approves Natrecor(R)for marketing, the FDA will subsequently conduct periodic inspections of these manufacturing facilities and, if deficiencies are identified, we may lose the ability to supply and sell Natrecor(R)for extended periods of time.We rely on third-party manufacturers, and if they experience any difficulties with their manufacturing processes, we may not obtain sufficient quantities of Natrecor® to assure availability.
We rely on third parties for the manufacture of bulk drug substances and final drug product for clinical and commercial purposes relating to Natrecor(R). Biochemie GmbH is responsible for manufacturing Natrecor(R)in bulk quantities and Abbott Laboratories is responsible for blending, filling and packaging Natrecor(R), and if they encounter problems in these processes, our revenues from future sales of Natrecor(R)could decrease. Natrecor(R)is manufactured using industry accepted recombinant manufacturing techniques, which must be conducted under strict controls and tight timelines. Natrecor(R)is subject to strict quality control testing during all phases of production and prior to its release to the market. Any quality control testing failures could lead to a reduction in the available supply of Natrecor(R). Biochemie depends on outside vendors for the timely supply of raw materials used to produce our products, including Natrecor(R). Once a supplier's materials have been selected for use in Biochemie's manufacturing process, the supplier in effect becomes a sole or limited source of that raw material due to regulatory compliance procedures. We depend on these third parties to perform their obligations effectively and on a timely basis. If these third parties fail to perform as required, our ability to deliver Natrecor(R)on a timely basis would be impaired. In addition, in the event of a natural disaster, equipment failure, power failure, strike or other difficulty, we may be unable to replace our third party manufacturers in a timely manner and would be unable to manufacture Natrecor(R)to meet market needs. The success of Natrecor(R)is highly dependent on our partner, Innovex L.P., a division of Quintiles Transnational Corp., for marketing, promotion and sales activities. We believe that for Natrecor(R)to be widely adopted, the efforts of an experienced sales force are needed. We have limited experience in managing or operating a marketing organization. Accordingly, we have entered into an exclusive agreement with Innovex to co-promote, sell and distribute Natrecor(R)in the United States. As part of our agreement with Innovex, we intend to build a sales force of approximately 180 people solely dedicated to the sale of Natrecor(R). If Innovex and we fail to devote appropriate resources to promote, sell and distribute Natrecor(R), sales of Natrecor(R)could be reduced. If Innovex breaches or terminates its agreement with us or otherwise fails to conduct its Natrecor(R)-related activities in a timely manner or if there is a dispute about its obligations, we may need to seek another partner. In that event, we cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain another partner on favorable terms, if at all.The failure of PharmaBio Development, Inc., an affiliate of Innovex, to fulfill its obligation to partially fund the commercialization of Natrecor® may affect our ability to successfully market Natrecor®.
PharmaBio has agreed to fund $30.0 million of our costs to launch Natrecor(R)over the first 24 months of Natrecor(R)'s commercialization and to loan us up to $5.0 million. Of the $30.0 million, we anticipate that $10.0 million will be paid to us in 2001 following FDA approval of Natrecor(R). If PharmaBio breaches or terminates its agreement with us or otherwise fails to fulfill its financial obligations under the agreement and we are unable to secure alternative funding, we may lose our ability to successfully market Natrecor(R).In the area of acute CHF, we face competition from companies with substantial financial, technical and marketing resources, which could limit our future revenues from Natrecor®.
Many therapeutic options are available for patients with acute CHF. Currently used drugs fall into three main categories: vasodilators, inotropes, and diuretics. Natrecor(R)would compete against both vasodilators and inotropes in the acute CHF market. Many of these drugs are available in generic formulation with an associated low cost. In addition, milrinone, an inotrope, is currently promoted by Sanofi-Synthelabo Inc. We may not be able to compete effectively with these long-standing current forms of therapy. In addition, we will price Natrecor(R)above the cost of these existing drugs, which may harm our competitive position relative to these drugs. New drugs in development for the treatment of acute CHF would also compete with Natrecor(R)if approved by the FDA or other regulatory agencies. Tezosentan(R), a non-selective endothelin receptor antagonist, is being developed by Actelion LTD. and is currently being evaluated in Phase III clinical trials as a vasodilator for the treatment of acute CHF. In addition, Abbott had previously submitted an NDA for Simdax(R), a calcium sensitizer described as an inotrope, but withdrew the application in 2000. To our knowledge, Abbott has not announced its intent to refile an NDA for Simdax(R). If any such new drug in development is approved by the FDA or other regulatory agencies, we may not be able to compete effectively with these new forms of therapy. If we fail to gain approval for Natrecor(R)and our other product candidates in international markets, our market opportunities will be limited. We have not yet filed for marketing clearance for the use of Natrecor(R)or any other product candidates in foreign countries, and we may not be able to obtain any international regulatory approvals for Natrecor(R)or any other product we develop. If we fail to obtain those approvals or if such approvals are delayed, the geographic market for Natrecor(R)or our other product candidates would be limited.We will require a partner to market and commercialize Natrecor® and our other product candidates in international markets.
We plan to partner with other companies for the sale of Natrecor(R)and our other product candidates outside of the United States. We cannot assure you that we will be able to enter into such arrangements on favorable terms or at all. In addition, partnering arrangements could result in lower levels of income to us than if we marketed our products entirely on our own. In the event that we are unable to enter into a partnering arrangement for Natrecor(R)or our other product candidates in international markets, we cannot assure you we will be able to develop an effective international sales force to successfully market and commercialize those products. If we fail to enter into partnering arrangements for our products and are unable to develop an effective international sales force, our revenues would be limited. If we fail to obtain additional marketing approvals from the FDA for the use of Natrecor(R)for additional therapeutic indications or if after approval such approval is subsequently revoked, our revenues from Natrecor(R) will suffer. In order to expand the medical uses, or therapeutic indications, for which we may market Natrecor(R), we must successfully complete additional clinical trials, which could be lengthy and expensive and will require the allocation of both substantial management and financial resources. Thereafter, we will have to apply separately to the FDA for clearance to market Natrecor(R)for other indications. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully complete the required clinical trials or that the FDA will approve Natrecor(R)for any additional indications. In addition, even if Natrecor(R)is approved by the FDA, we cannot exclude the possibility that serious adverse events related to the use of Natrecor(R)might occur in the future, which could either limit its use or cause the FDA to revoke our approval to market Natrecor(R).We have a history of losses, expect to operate at a loss for the foreseeable future and may never be profitable.
We may not be able to achieve or earn a profit in the future. We began operations in December 1981, and since that time, with the sole exception of 1983, we have not earned a profit on a full-year basis. Our losses have historically resulted primarily from our investments in research and development. As of March 31, 2001, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $415.6 million. To date, nearly all of our revenues have come from: |X| one-time signing fees from our corporate partners under agreements supporting the research, development and commercialization of our product candidates; |X| one-time payments from our corporate partners when we achieved regulatory or development milestones; |X| research funding from our corporate partners; and |X| our psychiatric sales and marketing division. We expect that our research, development and clinical trial activities and regulatory approvals, together with future general and administrative activities and the costs associated with launching and commercializing our product candidates and launching and commercializing Natrecor(R)in the United States, will result in significant expenses for the foreseeable future.If we fail to obtain the capital necessary to fund our operations, we may have to delay or scale back some of our programs or grant rights to third parties to develop and market our products.
We will continue to expend substantial resources developing new and existing product candidates, including costs associated with research and development, acquiring new technologies, conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals and manufacturing products. We believe our current working capital and future payments, if any, from our collaboration arrangements will be sufficient to meet our operating and capital requirements for at least the next 12 months. Our need for additional funding depends on a number of factors including: |X| higher costs and slower progress than expected in developing product candidates and obtaining regulatory approvals, particularly for Natrecor(R); |X| acquisition of technologies and other business opportunities that require financial commitments; or |X| lower revenues than expected from the commercialization of our potential products. Additional funding may not be available to us on favorable terms, if at all. We may raise funds through public or private financings, collaborative arrangements or other arrangements. Debt financing, if available, may involve covenants, which could restrict our business activities. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt financing when needed, we may be required to delay, scale back or eliminate expenditures for some of our development programs or grant rights to develop and market product candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market internally. If we are required to grant such rights, the ultimate value of these product candidates to us may be reduced.Our operating results are subject to fluctuations that may cause our stock price to decline.
Our revenues and expenses have fluctuated significantly in the past. This fluctuation has in turn caused our operating results to vary significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year. We expect the fluctuations in our revenues and expenses to continue, and thus, our operating results should also continue to vary significantly. These fluctuations may be due to a variety of factors including: |X| the timing and realization of milestone and other payments from our corporate partners; |X| the timing and amount of expenses relating to our research and development, product development and manufacturing activities; and|X| the extent and timing of costs related to our activities to obtain patents on our inventions and to extend, enforce and/or defend our patents and other rights to our intellectual property.
Because of these fluctuations, it is possible that our operating results for a particular quarter or quarters will not meet the expectations of public market analysts and investors, causing the market price of our common stock to decline. We believe that period-to-period comparisons of our operating results are not a good indication of our future performance, and you should not rely on those comparisons to predict our future operating or share price performance.We depend on our key personnel and we must continue to attract and retain key employees and consultants.
We depend on our key scientific and management personnel. Our ability to pursue the development of our current and future product candidates depends largely on retaining the services of our existing personnel and hiring additional qualified scientific personnel to perform research and development. We also rely on personnel with expertise in clinical testing, government regulation, manufacturing and marketing. Attracting and retaining qualified personnel will be critical to our success. We may not be able to attract and retain personnel on acceptable terms given the competition for such personnel among biotechnology, pharmaceutical and healthcare companies, universities and non-profit research institutions. Failure to retain our key scientific and management personnel or to attract additional highly-qualified personnel could delay the development of our product candidates and harm our business.Other than Natrecor®, our product candidates are at early stages of development, and if we are unable to develop and commercialize these product candidates successfully, we will not generate revenues from these products.
To date, none of our product candidates has been commercialized. Other than Natrecor(R), all of our product candidates are in early stages of development. We face the risk of failure normally found in developing biotechnology products based on new technologies. Successfully developing, manufacturing, introducing and marketing our early-stage product candidates will require several years and substantial additional capital. Our operations depend on compliance with complex FDA and comparable international regulations. If we fail to obtain approvals on a timely basis or to achieve continued compliance, the commercialization of our products could be delayed. We cannot assure you that we will receive the regulatory approvals necessary to commercialize our product candidates, which could cause our business to fail. Our product candidates are subject to extensive and rigorous government regulation by the FDA and comparable agencies in other countries. The FDA regulates, among other things, the development, testing, manufacture, safety, efficacy, record-keeping, labeling, storage, approval, advertising, promotion, sale and distribution of biopharmaceutical products. If our potential products are marketed abroad, they will also be subject to extensive regulation by foreign governments. None of our lead product candidates has been approved for sale in the United States or any foreign market. In addition, we have only limited experience in filing and pursuing applications necessary to gain regulatory approvals, which may impede our ability to obtain such approvals.The results of preclinical studies and clinical trials of our products may not be favorable.
In order to obtain regulatory approval for the commercial sale of any of our product candidates, we must conduct both preclinical studies and human clinical trials. These studies and trials must demonstrate that the product is safe and effective for the clinical use for which we are seeking approval. We are currently planning to conduct Phase II clinical trials of our lead p38 kinase inhibitor small molecule compound. The results of these or other clinical trials that we may conduct in the future may not be successful. Adverse results from our current or any future trials would harm our business. We also face the risk that we will not be permitted to undertake or continue clinical trials for any of our product candidates in the future. Even if we are able to conduct such trials, we may not be able to satisfactorily demonstrate that the products are safe and effective and thus qualify for the regulatory approvals needed to market and sell them. Results from preclinical studies and early clinical trials are often not accurate indicators of results of later- stage clinical trials that involve larger human populations.Our products use novel alternative technologies and therapeutic approaches, which have not been widely studied.
Many of our product development efforts focus on novel alternative therapeutic approaches and new technologies that have not been widely studied. These approaches and technologies may not be successful. We are applying these approaches and technologies in our attempt to discover new treatments for conditions that are also the subject of research and development efforts of many other companies.Rapid changes in technology and industry standards could render our potential products unmarketable.
We are engaged in a field characterized by extensive research efforts and rapid technological development. New drug discoveries and developments in our field and other drug discovery technologies are accelerating. Our competitors may develop technologies and products that are more effective than any we develop or that render our technology and potential products obsolete or noncompetitive. In addition, our potential products could become unmarketable if new industry standards emerge. To be successful, we will need to enhance our product candidates and design, develop and market new product candidates that keep pace with new technological and industry developments.Many other companies are targeting the same diseases and conditions as we are. Competitive products from other companies could significantly reduce the market acceptance of our products.
The markets in which we compete are well-established and intensely competitive. We may be unable to compete successfully against our current and future competitors. Our failure to compete successfully may result in pricing reductions, reduced gross margins and failure to achieve market acceptance for our potential products. Our competitors include pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, chemical companies, academic and research institutions and government agencies. For example, many pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies have initiated research programs similar to ours. Many of these organizations have substantially more experience and more capital, research and development, regulatory, manufacturing, sales, marketing, human and other resources than we do. As a result, they may: |X| develop products that are safer or more effective than our product candidates; |X| obtain FDA and other regulatory approvals or reach the market with their products; |X| more rapidly than we can, reducing the potential sales of our product candidates; |X| devote greater resources to market or sell their products; |X| adapt more quickly to new technologies and scientific advances; |X| initiate or withstand substantial price competition more successfully than we can; |X| have greater success in recruiting skilled scientific workers from the limited pool of available talent; |X| more effectively negotiate third-party licensing and collaboration arrangements; and |X| take advantage of acquisition or other opportunities more readily than we can. In addition, our product candidates, if approved and commercialized, will compete against well-established existing therapeutic products that are currently reimbursed by government health administration authorities, private health insurers and health maintenance organizations. We face and will continue to face intense competition from other companies for collaborative arrangements with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, for relationships with academic and research institutions and for licenses to proprietary technology. In addition, we anticipate that we will face increased competition in the future as new companies enter our markets and as scientific developments continue to expand the understanding of various diseases. While we will seek to expand our technological capabilities to remain competitive, research and development by others may render our technology or product candidates obsolete or noncompetitive or result in treatments or cures superior to any therapy developed by us. If we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights adequately, the value of our potential products could be diminished. Our success is dependent in part on obtaining, maintaining and enforcing our patents and other proprietary rights. Patent law relating to the scope of claims in the biotechnology field in which we operate is still evolving and surrounded by a great deal of uncertainty. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that our pending patent applications will result in issued patents. Because certain U.S. patent applications may be maintained in secrecy until a patent issues, we cannot assure you that others have not filed patent applications for technology covered by our pending applications or that we were the first to invent the technology. Other companies, universities and research institutions have or may obtain patents and patent applications that could limit our ability to use, manufacture, market or sell our product candidates or impair our competitive position. As a result, we may have to obtain licenses from other parties before we could continue using, manufacturing, marketing or selling our potential products. Any such licenses may not be available on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. If we do not obtain required licenses, we may not be able to market our potential products at all or we may encounter significant delays in product development while we redesign potentially infringing products or methods. In addition, although we own a number of patents, including issued patents and patent applications relating to Natrecor(R)and certain of our p38 kinase inhibitors, the issuance of a patent is not conclusive as to its validity or enforceability, and third parties may challenge the validity or enforceability of our patents. We cannot assure you how much protection, if any, will be given to our patents if we attempt to enforce them and they are challenged in court or in other proceedings. It is possible that a competitor may successfully challenge our patents or that challenges will result in limitations of their coverage. In addition, the cost of litigation to uphold the validity of patents can be substantial. If we are unsuccessful in such litigation, third parties may be able to use our patented technologies without paying licensing fees or royalties to us. Moreover, competitors may infringe our patents or successfully avoid them through design innovation. To prevent infringement or unauthorized use, we may need to file infringement claims, which are expensive and time- consuming. In addition, in an infringement proceeding, a court may decide that a patent of ours is not valid or may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that its technology is not covered by our patents. Policing unauthorized use of our intellectual property is difficult, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to prevent misappropriation of our proprietary rights, particularly in countries where the laws may not protect such rights as fully as in the United States. In addition to our patented technology, we also rely on unpatented technology, trade secrets and confidential information. We may not be able to effectively protect our rights to this technology or information. Other parties may independently develop substantially equivalent information and techniques or otherwise gain access to or disclose our technology. We require each of our employees, consultants and corporate partners to execute a confidentiality agreement at the commencement of an employment, consulting or collaborative relationship with us. However, these agreements may not provide effective protection of our technology or information or, in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure, they may not provide adequate remedies. If we fail to negotiate or maintain successful arrangements with third parties, our development and marketing activities may be delayed or reduced. We have entered into, and we expect to enter into in the future, arrangements with third parties to perform research, development, regulatory compliance, manufacturing or marketing activities relating to some or all of our product candidates. If we fail to secure or maintain successful collaborative arrangements, our development and marketing activities may be delayed or reduced. We may be unable to negotiate favorable collaborative arrangements that, if necessary, modify our existing arrangements on acceptable terms. Most of our agreements can be terminated under certain conditions by our partners. In addition, our partners may separately pursue competing products, therapeutic approaches or technologies to develop treatments for the diseases targeted by us or our efforts. Even if our partners continue their contributions to the collaborative arrangements, they may nevertheless determine not to actively pursue the development or commercialization of any resulting products. Also, our partners may fail to perform their obligations under the collaborative arrangements or may be slow in performing their obligations. In these circumstances, our ability to develop and market potential products could be severely limited.Our stock price continues to experience large fluctuations, and you could lose some or all of your investment.
The market price of our stock has been and is likely to continue to be highly volatile. These price fluctuations have been rapid and severe. The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly in response to the following factors, most of which are beyond our control: |X| variations in our quarterly operating results; |X| changes in securities analysts 'estimates of our financial performance; |X| changes in market valuations of similar companies; |X| announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts; |X| acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments; |X| additions or departures of key personnel; |X| future sales of common stock; |X| announcements by us or our competitors of technological innovations of new therapeutic products, clinical trial results and developments in patent or other proprietary rights; |X| announcements regarding government regulations, public concern as to the safety of drugs developed by us or others or changes in reimbursement policies; and|X| fluctuations in stock market price and volume, which are particularly common among securities of biopharmaceutical companies.
We are at risk of securities class action litigation. In the past, securities class action litigation has often been brought against a company following a decline in the market price of its securities. This risk is especially relevant for us because biotechnology companies have experienced greater than average stock price volatility in recent years. Several years ago, we were the subject of a securities class action lawsuit, which was eventually dismissed with a determination that the plaintiffs had no basis for their claim. If we face such litigation in the future, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management's attention and resources, which could harm our business.We have implemented provisions in our charter documents that may ultimately delay, discourage or prevent a change in our management or control of us.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that could make it more difficult for our stockholders to replace or remove our directors or to effect any other corporate action. These provisions include those which: |X| prohibit holders of less than ten percent of our outstanding capital stock from calling special meetings of stockholders; |X| prohibit stockholder action by written consent, thereby requiring stockholder actions to be taken at a meeting of our stockholders; and|X| establish advance notice requirements for nominations for election to the board of directors or for proposing matters than can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings.
Moreover, our certificate of incorporation does not provide for cumulative voting in the election of directors, which would otherwise allow less than a majority of stockholders to elect director candidates. Some of the above provisions may also have possible anti-takeover effects, which may make an acquisition of us by a third party more difficult, even if such an acquisition could be beneficial to our stockholders. In addition, our certificate of incorporation also authorizes us to issue up to 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more different series with terms to be determined by our board of directors at time of issuance. As of March 31, 2001, an aggregate of 71,053 shares of preferred stock had been reserved for issuance by the board of directors and 4,991 preferred shares were issued and outstanding. Issuance of other shares of preferred stock could also be used as an anti-takeover device.(a) The following individuals were elected directors of Scios, each to serve until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2002:
Total Vote For Total Vote Withheld Name Each Director From Each Director ---- -------------- ------------------ Samuel H. Armacost 35,072,131 1,373,160 Richard B. Brewer 35,064,818 1,380,473 Randal J. Kirk 34,955,102 1,490,189 Donald B. Rice, Ph.D. 35,070,778 1,374,513 Charles A. Sanders, M.D. 35,042,005 1,403,286 Solomon H. Snyder, M.D. 35,073,989 1,371,302 Burton E. Sobel, M.D. 35,071,225 1,374,066 Eugene L. Step 35,064,182 1,381,109 (b) The following matters were submitted and each was approved by our stockholders, with votes cast as indicated: o To approve an amendment to our 1992 Equity Incentive Plan: Votes cast for: 31,875,840 Votes cast against: 4,397,020 Abstentions: 172,431 o To approve adoption of our 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan: Votes cast for: 35,201,976 Votes cast against: 1,078,771 Abstentions: 164,544 ="Times New Roman, Times, Serif" SIZE=2>o To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent accountant for fiscal 2001: Votes cast for: 36,318,005 Votes cast against: 46,256 Abstentions: 81,030Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K (a) Exhibits None (b) Reports on Form 8-K None SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. SCIOS INC. May 15, 2001 By: /s/ Richard B. Brewer ---------------------- Richard B. Brewer, President and CEO May 15, 2001 By: /s/ David W. Gryska -------------------- David W. Gryska, Senior Vice President and CFO