e10vk
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
x
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
2010
|
|
OR
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Transition Period
from to .
|
Commission File Number
001-33002
L-1
IDENTITY SOLUTIONS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
02-0807887
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
177 Broad Street, 12th Floor, Stamford, CT
|
|
06901
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(203)-504-1100
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act: Common Stock $.001 par value NYSE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act: None
Indicate by a check mark if the Registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. o Yes x No
Indicate by a check mark if the Registrant is not required to
file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d)
of the Exchange
Act. o Yes x No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained to the best
of the registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference into
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer x
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by a check mark whether the Registrant is a shell
Company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2). o Yes þ No
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2010, was
approximately $630.3 million.
As of February 24, 2011, the registrant had
90,311,719 shares of Common Stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain information contained in the Proxy Statement for the
2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the registrant is
incorporated by reference into Part III of this
Form 10-K.
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART I
|
Item 1.
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Item 1A.
|
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Item 1B.
|
|
|
Unresolved Staff Comments
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
|
[Removed and Reserved]
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
PART II
|
Item 5.
|
|
|
Market for the Registrants Common Equity, Related
Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Item 6.
|
|
|
Selected Financial Data
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Item 7.
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Item 7A.
|
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Item 8.
|
|
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Item 9.
|
|
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Item 9A.
|
|
|
Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Item 9B.
|
|
|
Other Information
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
PART III
|
Item 10.
|
|
|
Directors and Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Item 11.
|
|
|
Executive Compensation
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Item 12.
|
|
|
Security ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
and Related Stockholder Matters
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Item 13.
|
|
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director
Independence
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Item 14.
|
|
|
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
PART IV
|
Item 15.
|
|
|
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
i
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.]
PART I
In this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
the words
L-1
and the Company refer to L-1 Identity Solutions,
Inc. and, except as otherwise specified herein, to L-1
subsidiaries. L-1s fiscal year ended on December 31,
2010.
Business
Overview
L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc. (L-1 or the
Company) is a provider of technology, products,
systems and solutions, and services that protect and secure
personal identities and assets. Through its divisions, L-1
delivers the full range of offerings required for solving
complex problems associated with managing identity. Depending
upon customer needs, L-1 services can be bundled with identity
solutions, product and services offerings to create an
integrated solution.
In September 2010, the Company announced that it entered into an
agreement to be acquired by Safran in a merger transaction
providing for stockholders to receive $12.00 per share in cash,
for an aggregate enterprise value of approximately
$1.6 billion, inclusive of outstanding debt. The per share
consideration of $12.00 incorporates the purchase price received
pursuant to the sale of the L-1 Intel Business referred to under
the headings of Discontinued Operations and
Recent Transactions later in this document for
additional information. The per share price represents a premium
of 24 percent over L-1s closing stock price on the
NYSE on September 17, 2010 and a premium of 66 percent
over the closing stock price on January 5, 2010, the day
prior to L-1s announcement of its strategic alternatives
review process. In February 2011, the Company sold its Intel
Business to BAE Systems for cash of $295.8 million
(inclusive of acquired cash), the proceeds of which were used to
repay $289.3 million of debt outstanding under the Credit
Agreement.
The Company operates in two reportable segments: Solutions
and Services.
Solutions
The Solutions segment consists of the Secure Credentialing and
Biometrics / Enterprise Access Divisions. Solutions
from these divisions are marketed to Federal agencies, State and
Local government agencies (including law enforcement and
department of corrections), foreign governments, and commercial
entities (such as financial and health care institutions and
casinos). Solutions revenue includes products and related
services, which comprise hardware, components, consumables and
software, as well as maintenance, consulting and training
services.
Secure Credentialing Solutions are used by many
government customers to produce the most secure identity
documents possible. The division builds and maintains an
end-to-end
secure credentialing solution that starts with identity
proofing, vetting, and enrollment; incorporating biometric-based
recognition and identity database management; card design and
production; and inspection and authentication. More than two
billion government-issued IDs have been produced to date using
L-1 solutions. These include more than 80 percent of
U.S. drivers licenses (including Enhanced
Drivers Licenses), the U.S. Passport,
U.S. Passport Card and Border Crossing Card, and other
citizen credentials such as National and Voter IDs, passports
and more.
States continue to look to L-1 to help improve the security of
their processes and systems, while increasing efficiencies and
improving the customer experience. As a result, momentum in the
North American drivers license business in 2010 was driven
primarily by developing and delivering solutions that include
infrastructure, automated testing and screening, facial
recognition, document authentication and card production. The
division installed and went live with seven
end-to-end
DL systems in 2010 and upgraded the systems of four other States
with additional enterprise solutions consisting of a combination
of knowledge testing, skills testing, and facial recognition. In
addition, self-service kiosks designed to offer a more
convenient method for replacing and renewing drivers
licenses were deployed in 2010.
One of the most significant State contracts of 2010 was a five
year contract extension valued at $56.9 million by the
Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles to
modernize the currently
1
installed secure drivers license solution. L-1 expects to
produce in excess of 28 million licenses for Floridians
over the term of the contract. L-1s efforts with Florida
to enhance current security features and the States
drivers license solution positioned the customer for a
Homeland Security Award by the Coalition for a Secure
Drivers License (CSDL) on July 19, 2010.
Other highlights for the division during the year included
winning a significant international credentialing contract with
a large African nation to provide its first biometric-based
secure drivers license solution.
The division also introduced ExianSmart, the industrys
first contactless smart card with a 15 year life.
Self-service kiosks designed to offer a more convenient method
for replacing and renewing drivers licenses that were
introduced in late 2009 gained momentum, more than tripling the
number of deployments in 2010.
Biometric Solutions protect and secure personal
identities and assets with
state-of-the
art technologies to capture, store, manage and distribute
biometric data for positive, rapid ID and tracking of persons of
interest as part of large-scale identity management programs.
The solutions play an important role within many of the
worlds largest identity-related programs today as part of
civilian and criminal identification in border management,
national identity, credentialing, law enforcement and military
applications. Biometric solutions also encompass access control
readers that enable businesses and governments to secure
facilities and restricted areas preventing unauthorized entry.
L-1 biometric-based identity management solutions encompass
finger, face, full hand, palm, iris and vein recognition. The
solutions combine the power of industry leading ABIS (Automated
Biometric Identification System) software with advanced
biometric readers, capture and authentication devices and access
control units. L-1 hardware and software components can be
combined to create customized biometric solutions to meet any
customer requirement. Highlights for the division in 2010
include:
|
|
|
|
|
The first operation in India for L-1 was opened in 2010 to
support an award as one of the Biometric Solution Providers
(BSPs) to Indias Unique Identification Number (UID)
program, or AADHAAR. Over 12,000 L-1 finger and iris biometric
capture devices were shipped to India in 2010 for this program.
The orders include both Agile
TPtm
fingerprint slap devices and
Mobile-Eyestm
iris cameras, both of which have been certified for the UID
program by the Standardization, Testing and Quality
Certification (STQC) Directorate for the Government of
Indias Department of Information Technology (DIT).
|
|
|
|
The acquisition of the Retica intellectual property completed in
April 2010 expanded the reach of L-1 iris solutions to include a
low cost hand held iris capture device called Mobile-Eyes. The
device is already delivering strategic value, with inclusion in
several international bids and proposals and with shipments as
noted as part of the UID program.
|
|
|
|
Two important U.S. contracts were secured in 2010 including
the contract to maintain and manage the facial recognition
database for the U.S. Department of State Visa and Passport
programs and the contract to expand L-1s ABIS applications
in the U.S. Department of Defense.
|
|
|
|
In law enforcement, L-1 provided over 1,000 IBIS Extreme, mobile
fingerprinting capture devices, for use by the national police
force of a European country.
|
|
|
|
A competitive contract was awarded to L-1 by the Department of
Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate, Human
Factors Division, to fund the development of next generation
technology for use in mobile four finger slap image capture
devices. The L-1 technology is unique and proprietary to the
Company and will be used to develop new products with
significantly reduced weight and size as compared to other
mobile devices in the market today.
|
|
|
|
Iris and face algorithms from L-1 continue to receive top marks
in independent testing. Recent National Institute of Standards
and Technology (NIST) IREX (Iris Exchange) tests showed that the
L-1 algorithm produced the best accuracy of all 10 iris vendor
participants averaged over all test databases at the most
demanding operating point. In recent NIST MBE testing for face,
L-1s
FaceIt®
technology was shown to scale to large databases under
real-world operating requirements.
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
HIIDE 5 and a new middleware application introduced in early
July 2010 represent several industry firsts, setting a new
standard for speed and efficiency and an expansion of the
addressable market for HIIDE.
|
|
|
|
L-1 provided and installed over 600 fingerprint enrollment
stations to the Department of Homeland Security to support
immigrant processing.
|
|
|
|
Multi-biometric ABIS systems were provided to several countries
in the Middle East and Africa for border crossing applications.
|
|
|
|
A new access control solution, the first from L-1 to use finger
vein recognition technology, was released in 2010. Existing
pilot programs for the Transportation Worker Identification
Credential (TWIC) outdoor access control readers at the
nations ports remain on track and L-1 shipped additional
4G outdoor Extreme units for new port projects throughout the
year.
|
Services
The Services segment consists of the Enrollment Services
Division that offers a proven, reliable and cost-effective
alternative for governments and commercial businesses that seek
to outsource the collection of civilian biometric and
identification data required for civilian applications for
government-issued ID cards, Visas and Passports, permits and
other entitlement benefits. L-1s convenient, secure and
customer-friendly centers in the U.S. and Canada offer
faster data submissions with fewer rejections and simplified
processing. As a result, individuals are vetted quickly and with
confidence. More than 10 million people have been processed
to date through L-1 enrollment services. This includes:
|
|
|
|
|
Individuals employed in more than 5,000 educational institutions
and charitable / volunteer organizations.
|
|
|
|
Federal employees and contractors required by HSPD-12 (Homeland
Security Presidential Directive 12) to have an ID
credential with verified personal identity.
|
|
|
|
Nurses, doctors, home healthcare and nursing facility workers
and others in the healthcare community.
|
|
|
|
Commercial drivers applying for a TSA (Transportation Security
Administration) HazPrint endorsement.
|
|
|
|
Maritime workers seeking a Transportation Worker identification
Credential (TWIC) card.
|
|
|
|
Regulated commercial industry employees such as those working in
national banks, brokerage firms and financial institutions.
|
|
|
|
People performing community jobs, such as coaches, residential
contractors and more who are required by their local
jurisdiction to have a background check.
|
|
|
|
Citizens applying for Visas and those enrolling into
government-sponsored humanitarian, health and welfare programs.
|
At December 31, 2010, the division had approximately 1100
collection sites, including adding centers in six new States and
launching Beta Super Sites that offer extended service offerings
such as Child ID, notary services, FBI hard cards, I-9
verification and more. The division also processed
2.2 million prints, up from 1.9 million in 2009.
Volume continues to increase among existing State contracts,
with New York and Texas among the highest. L-1 expects to see
additional State growth across the U.S. from adoption by
new groups, such as elder care and handgun permits.
At the Federal level, there is an upward trend in the
Transportation Security Authority (TSA) Hazardous Materials
Endorsement (HazPrint) program, where the division enrolled
nearly 200,000 Ground Transportation workers. The division also
continued its stewardship of the Transportation Worker
Identification Credential (TWIC) program, enrolling over 300,000
maritime workers into the TSAs system in 2010.
3
Discontinued
Operations
As a result of the BAE transaction described below, the
Government Consulting Services businesses have been accounted as
discontinued operations. Government Consulting Services includes
the businesses of Advanced Concepts (Information Technology
Solutions), McClendon (Engineering & Analytical
Solutions), and SpecTal (Intelligence Services). Government
Consulting Services offer comprehensive consulting, program
management, information analysis, training, security, technology
development, and information technology solutions to the
U.S. intelligence community.
Recent
Transactions
In January 2010, L-1 announced that one of its strategic goals
and objectives for 2010 was to explore strategic alternatives to
enhance shareholder value. Subsequently, on September 19,
2010, the Company entered into an agreement (the Merger
Agreement) with Safran SA (Safran) and Laser
Acquisition Sub Inc. (Merger Sub), a wholly owned
subsidiary of Safran, pursuant to which, subject to the terms
and conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, the Company is
to be acquired by Safran in a merger transaction providing for
shareholders to receive $12.00 per share in cash, for an
aggregate enterprise value of approximately $1.6 billion,
inclusive of outstanding debt. Completion of the merger remains
subject to certain conditions, including, among others,
(i) termination or expiration of the Committee on Foreign
Investment in the United States (CFIUS) review
period pursuant to the Exon-Florio Provision of the Defense
Production Act of 1950; (ii) no Company Material Adverse
Effect (as defined in the Merger Agreement) having occurred
since the date of the Merger Agreement; (iii) subject to
certain materiality exceptions, the accuracy of the
representations and warranties made by the Company and Safran
and compliance by the Company and Safran with their respective
obligations under the Merger Agreement; (iv) no law or
government order prohibiting the merger; and (v) other
customary conditions.
In February 2011, the Company completed its previously announced
sale of SpecTal/McClendon and Advanced Concepts (the Intel
Business) to BAE Systems Information Solutions, Inc.
(BAE) (a subsidiary of BAE Systems, Inc., the
U.S. affiliate of BAE Systems plc). Pursuant to the terms
of the Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 19, 2010
(the BAE Purchase Agreement), by and between the
Company and BAE, the Company sold the Intel Business to BAE for
a purchase price of $295.8 million in cash (inclusive of
acquired cash) and approximately $7.2 million in assumed
obligations, the net proceeds of which were used to repay
$289.3 million of outstanding debt under the Companys
credit agreement.
The accompanying financial data reflect the impact of the sale
of the Intel Business, whose operating results have been
reflected as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
However, the consolidated financial statements do not reflect
the pro forma effect of the sale of the Intel Business or the
repayment of the long-term debt in accordance with the terms of
the Credit Agreement. Unless otherwise noted, revenues and
expenses presented herein exclude amounts attributable to
discontinued operations. See Notes 1 and 15 to the
consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Markets
and Trends in Biometrics Solutions
Government-issued breeder documents (such as birth
certificates and social security cards) and IDs granted based on
these documents (such as drivers licenses or passports)
serve as the primary means for confirming the identity of an
individual. The integrity, however, of these documents and
credentials can be compromised because they can be counterfeited
or altered, issued under false pretenses and historically have
rarely been linked to an identity database. Failure to provide
adequate identification protection can lead to breaches of
security and identity theft, the consequences of which can range
from national security threats and loss of life to significant
economic loss. Within this context, L-1 believes that there is
increasing pressure on governments and businesses to accelerate
the adoption of advanced technology identity solutions to
validate identities.
A core element to the L-1 identity management value proposition
is biometrics. Biometrics are unique, individual physiological
or behavioral characteristics, such as fingerprints, palm
prints, facial characteristics,
4
iris and voice patterns, hand geometry and handwriting patterns,
which can be used to determine or verify an individuals
identity. Technology digitally captures and encodes these
individual biometric characteristics and then compares that
uniquely personal characteristic against previously encoded
biometric data to determine or validate an individuals
identity.
Each biometric is unique to each person, making it the best
means possible today to verify that a person is whomever
he/she
claims to be. Furthermore, biometric technology provides
improved accuracy and security of the credential, as well as
convenience and cost-effectiveness for the individual,
overcoming the limitations inherent in traditional
identification and authentication processes such as paper
credentials, passwords, PIN codes and magnetic access cards.
Governments and their agencies were the early adopters of
biometrics and today remain the primary customers for the
industry. For law enforcement, biometric technology permits more
efficient criminal booking and processing and also allows
officers in the field to identify potential suspects more
reliably and efficiently. Within the military, biometrics are
used for the verification and identification of military
personnel and contractors and collection and processing of
biometrics from non-military personnel for the purpose of
identifying potential hostile persons. At the national level,
governments throughout the world have taken steps to improve
security in response to heightened concerns over public safety
from the threat of terrorism. National governments have mandated
increased spending on security measures, implemented new
regulations and placed greater emphasis on technology to address
growing security concerns.
L-1 believes that the market for biometrics will continue to
grow significantly. L-1 believes that this growth is a function
of customer demand and the ability for the industry to meet the
demand. L-1 believes that major drivers of biometric growth in
the future will include:
|
|
|
|
|
Implementation of biometrics in national security-related
applications broadly characterized as anti-terror, such as
border management, national ID, immigration control and critical
infrastructure applications such as employee authentication and
access control.
|
|
|
|
Integration into commercial access control solutions that grant
entry and confirm presence in buildings and restricted areas
based on biometric recognition.
|
|
|
|
Expansion of biometrics within law enforcement to enroll, verify
and ID suspects, detainees and prisoners and confirm if the
individual is wanted, incarcerated or has a criminal history.
|
|
|
|
Inclusion of biometrics as a component of solutions that address
identity fraud and that promote social and economic development
in the developing world.
|
|
|
|
Incorporation of biometrics into licensing processes and
background checks required for people employed in licensed
positions, such as daycare workers, insurance agents and those
employed in education-related fields.
|
In addition, L-1 believes that identity-related mandates within
the government will increase demand for biometric solutions. The
Company anticipates the government will recommend and in some
cases mandate the use of secure authentication, such as
biometrics, as a key component of identity verification. Some of
the programs include the U.S. Visitor and Immigrant Status
Indicator Technology program (U.S. VISIT), which uses
biometric data as part of its screening procedures for
non-U.S. citizens
entering the United States; Department of State (DoS) Western
Hemisphere Travel Initiative (WHTI) Passport Card and Border
Crossing Card (BCC) programs that issue limited use passports in
a wallet size format for use in crossing U.S. borders;
Transportation Workers Identification Credential (TWIC) for
transportation workers; Transportation Security Administration
(TSA) Hazardous Material Threat Assessment Program (HAZMAT)
mandating fingerprinting and security threat assessment of
commercial truck drivers applying for, renewing or transferring
the hazardous materials endorsement (HME) on State-issued
Commercial Drivers Licenses (CDL); Homeland Security
Presidential Directive 12 (HSPD-12), which mandates that a
common identification card be utilized by all Federal government
employees and contractors; and the REAL ID Act, signed into law
in May 2005, which mandates authentication of a persons
identity before they are issued a drivers license.
5
While fingerprints are expected to continue to be the most
prevalent biometric technology in the U.S. in the near
term, iris, face, palm and other technologies are being adopted
and combined with fingerprinting in multi-biometric applications
to provide an additional level of security and accuracy and to
allow for increased flexibility for applications where
fingerprints are not suitable.
Automated Biometric Identification Systems (ABIS) and Live Scan
Systems are the largest market space for biometrics. These are
large scale and highly complex systems used in law enforcement,
background checks, and civil identification programs. Live scans
are deployed as a front end to most ABIS systems and include
hardware and software that capture and process fingerprint
images prior to submission. The ABIS and Live Scan market is
considerably more mature than any other biometric market sector.
Increasingly, multiple biometrics are also being incorporated
into these systems, augmenting fingerprints with hand/palm
prints, facial images and iris patterns.
Internationally, many countries have established or are
establishing more secure national identification, drivers
license, passport, border crossing control and voter
registration programs and many of these systems are expected to
utilize biometric technologies. In addition to protecting
citizens, some of these programs are also aimed at helping
identify potential terrorist threats. The U.S. established
legislation requiring biometric identifiers to be included in
the passports of current Visa Waiver countries (countries where
citizens are not required to obtain a Visa prior to entering the
U.S.). L-1 offers a range of solutions, products and
technologies that can be utilized in national identification
and/or
passport and border crossing programs to enroll and verify
citizens, visitors and potential threats
and/or to
add biometric identifiers to national identification
and/or
passport programs. Accordingly the Company believes that
international markets provide an opportunity for revenue growth.
While L-1 anticipates consistent opportunities for revenue
growth, the following may adversely affect the rate of this
growth:
|
|
|
|
|
The global economic slowdown and its impact on government
funding and procurements related to security.
|
|
|
|
Dependence on complex government programs with elongated
procurement, sales and implementation cycles.
|
|
|
|
Competition from non-biometric technologies that provide more
affordable, but less robust, authentication (such as tokens and
smart cards).
|
|
|
|
Privacy and legal challenges relating to biometric identifiers
by private citizens and advocacy groups.
|
|
|
|
The potential for changes in government policy relating to
privacy issues.
|
Customers
Continuing Operations
Over 94 percent of L-1 sales are to Federal, State, Local
and foreign governments and government agencies. Contracts with
governments and agencies generally allow the customer to
terminate the contract for convenience or failure of the
government to appropriate funds.
For the year ended December 31, 2010, U.S. Federal
government agencies accounted for 36 percent of L-1s
continuing operations revenues. Historically, L-1 has
experienced minimal customer turnover and the Company believes
this is a result of its strong solutions and emphasis on
customer service and support.
L-1 customers include:
|
|
|
|
|
Federal agencies and branches of the U.S. military.
|
|
|
|
More than 60 international governments.
|
|
|
|
Many State and Local Public Safety Organizations across the
U.S., including Department of Motor Vehicles and law enforcement
agencies.
|
|
|
|
Many of the traditional large systems integrators.
|
|
|
|
Several commercial enterprises including those in gaming,
finance, healthcare and more.
|
6
As a percentage of L-1 revenue, excluding the domestically
focused service businesses, L-1s international sales in
products and solutions have grown from 12 percent in 2006
to 21 percent in 2010. The trend reflects an increased
international marketing focus, which we expect to continue.
Competition
The market for L-1 solutions and services is extremely
competitive. L-1s ability to differentiate from the
competition is predicated on a number of factors, the most
significant of which are described below.
In-house development of core biometric
technologies. L-1 is the only company that
directly offers Fingerprint and Palm print (AFIS/APIS), facial
and iris recognition technologies and remains at the forefront
of innovation through its strong and focused internal
development team. Because of L-1s in depth knowledge of
the core identity technologies, L-1 can offer customers speed of
operation and value for identity solutions. Accordingly, L-1 can
provide a complete turnkey solution that include software,
hardware, back end system design, workflow management and
support services.
State-of-the-art
technologies are encapsulated in
standards-based, open-architecture
solutions. L-1s identification platform is
based on open standards allowing for ease of system delivery,
maintenance and scalability to accommodate future needs.
The flexibility to use products and services together as a
complete solution or as modular components within an existing
solution. A customer-focused solution set
approach enables L-1 to customize and integrate its products and
services to solve the unique identity challenges of customers in
Federal, civil, State and Local, criminal, border management and
commercial markets.
Strong and tenured relationships with customers and
partners. Today L-1 customers include Federal
agencies and branches of the U.S. military, many
international governments, the majority of U.S. State
Departments of Motor Vehicle (DMV) and local law
enforcement agencies, and other commercial customers. The
pervasiveness of
L-1 relationships
makes the Company a trusted choice for customers and partners
seeking relationships with proven vendors. L-1 is on several
teams for Biometric Operations Systems and Services (BOSS)
program.
L-1 believes its ability to offer multi-modal identity solutions
incorporating finger, face, palm/hand and iris technologies,
together with search and matching software to work with large
databases, is a significant differentiator for the Company.
The comprehensive nature of L-1 solutions, products and services
encompass the full spectrum of identity management needs,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
Delivering the effective means of uniquely identifying
individuals through advanced multi-modal biometric recognition
technologies.
|
|
|
|
Producing the most highly secure credentials that serves as
proof of identity.
|
|
|
|
Providing biometrically-enabled access control for buildings and
secure areas.
|
|
|
|
Offering enrollment service centers for fast, accurate
electronic civilian fingerprinting and background checks.
|
L-1 faces competition from a number of companies that are
actively engaged in developing and marketing identity management
related solutions and services. Many of L-1s competitors
have greater financial resources than L-1, including large
system integrators who may enter markets L-1 competes in.
The markets for L-1 solutions and services are characterized by
rapid technological change as a result of technical developments
exploited by competitors, the changing technical needs of the
customers, and frequent introductions of new features. L-1
expects competition to increase as other companies introduce
products that are more price competitive, may have increased
performance or functionality, or that incorporate technological
advances not yet developed or implemented by L-1. To compete
effectively in this environment, L-1 must
7
continually develop and market new and enhanced products at
competitive prices, and have the resources to invest in
significant research and development activities.
L-1 competes based on technology (with particular emphasis on
speed and accuracy), service and support, product quality,
price, reliability, capability to work with large database
systems and flexibility in accommodating customer technical and
business needs.
Business
Development, Marketing and Sales, Bids and Proposals
Marketing
and Sales
L-1 solutions and services are marketed through a direct sales
and business development force, channel partners, and strategic
partnerships and alliances.
The direct sales force markets and sells the entire identity
solutions and services portfolio. The worldwide sales force
delivers solutions and services to markets in North and South
America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. A
dedicated U.S. Federal sales team in Washington, D.C.
markets and sells to U.S. government agencies such as the
Department of Defense, Department of State, Department of
Justice and Department of Homeland Security, among others. A
dedicated team of sales and services professionals operating
from locations in Europe, Middle East and the Far East
strengthen global sales coverage and access to the international
markets.
The Company also adopted a coordinated team approach to pursuing
intelligence agency opportunities to provide broader and
stronger service offerings.
Sales plans are developed by market by division focusing on
Federal, State and Local, international and commercial. The
emphasis is on maintaining responsibility within the divisional
profit and loss centers for accountability of performance.
Within the divisions, the sales organizations are supported by
functional groups which architect solutions or services
and/or
design, engineer, source manufacture, market, fulfill and
support market-specific offerings. Sales teams are further
supported by a professional service group which customizes
solutions for each market and a field service group that ensures
ongoing performance of L-1 systems.
At the end of 2010, L-1 employed 128 professionals in business
development, sales and marketing.
Strategic
Partnerships
L-1 has strategic partnerships and distribution channels that
broaden coverage and increase market opportunities globally. L-1
established Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) distribution
arrangements with partners to leverage L-1 technologies. L-1
uses channels of distribution for its document authentication
products to expand markets outside of the U.S. L-1 also
works with systems integrators, solution providers and service
organizations to deliver identity solutions in combination with
their core capabilities to expand access to pre-existing
relationships, marketing resources and credibility in new
markets. Local partners are also utilized to expand L-1s
international access to market opportunities internationally.
Bids
and Proposals
Most of the Companys business is won through submission of
formal competitive bids. Commercial bids are frequently
negotiated as to terms and conditions for schedule,
specifications, delivery and payment. However, in most cases the
client specifies the terms and conditions and form of contract.
In situations where the client-imposed contract type
and/or terms
appear to expose L-1 to inappropriate risk, the Company may seek
alternative arrangements or opt not to bid for the work. L-1
contracts and subcontracts are primarily firm fixed and fixed
unit price contracts.
8
The majority of L-1 sales to new customers are the result of
competitive bidding for contracts pursuant to public sector
procurement rules. In some cases, L-1 may be competing with an
entity that has a pre-existing relationship with a potential
customer, which could put L-1 at a significant competitive
disadvantage. In other cases,
L-1 may
have pre-existing relationships with customers, which gives the
Company an advantage over the competition. All material bids and
proposals are subject to review and approval by senior corporate
management prior to submission.
Research,
Engineering and Development
Research and development activities are organized into centers
of excellence located across, and managed by the Companys
divisions, primarily the Biometrics and Secure Credentialing
Divisions.
The research, engineering and development team totals
approximately 300 developers, scientists and engineers
distributed among these centers. Activities are coordinated at
the corporate level under the Companys Chief Strategic
Officer to ensure support of the overall innovation goals and
mission of L-1 and the realization of synergies in the research
engineering and development investment.
Research, engineering and development efforts are focused on
critical components for advanced technology identity solutions.
These include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
Proprietary software that addresses image capture.
|
|
|
|
Image processing.
|
|
|
|
Face, iris, fingerprint and palm recognition.
|
|
|
|
Biometric fusion logic and intelligent decision making.
|
|
|
|
Information retrieval from identity databases.
|
|
|
|
Scalability of search and the accuracy of searching and matching
algorithms within very large databases.
|
|
|
|
Document authentication.
|
The Company invests in the development of capture technologies
for finger, palm and iris.
L-1 maintains
an active program for the development of new security features
for credentials.
L-1 believes the next generation biometric matching algorithms
for fingerprint, facial, and iris recognition technology will be
more reliable and cost effective than current technology, as
well as provide additional functionality, including the storage
of fingerprint
and/or
facial and iris templates on smart cards and similar storage
devices. In addition, L-1 focuses on expanding its capabilities
in solutions for the civil identification, and border management
markets.
The Company benefits from the development activities of
manufacturers of the components integrated into L-1 systems.
This includes cameras, database software and computers.
L-1 performs
research and development for customers, including efforts for
the U.S. government and pursuant to grants from certain
European government agencies. Gross research, engineering and
development expenditures aggregated to $50.1 million for
the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to
$46.9 million in the prior year. Virtually all of L-1
research, engineering and development costs are attributable to
the Solutions segment. As a percentage of Solutions revenues,
gross research and development costs were 15 percent for
years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.
Intellectual
Property
L-1 relies on patent, copyright, trademark and trade secrets and
contract law to establish and maintain proprietary rights in
technology products and manufacturing processes. The success of
the business will depend in part on this proprietary technology
and protection of that technology.
9
While intellectual property rights are important to success, L-1
believes that neither its business as a whole, nor any business
segment is materially dependent on any particular patent,
trademark, license or other intellectual property right.
The Company owns a portfolio of 257 U.S. and foreign
patents. In addition, L-1 has 133 U.S. and foreign patent
applications in process for biometrics and document
authentication technologies. While the duration of patents
varies, the Company believes that the duration of its patents is
adequate relative to the expected lives of L-1 products. L-1
owns the registered trademarks for L-1 and L-1
Identity Solutions, and owns a broad portfolio of other
vital registered and pending trademarks in the U.S. and
foreign jurisdictions.
Backlog
Backlog represents sales value of firm orders for products and
services not yet delivered and, for long term executed
contractual arrangements (contracts, subcontracts, and customer
commitments), the estimated future sales value of estimated
product shipments, transactions processed and services to be
provided over the term of the contractual arrangements,
including renewal options expected to be exercised.
For contracts with indefinite quantities, backlog reflects
estimated quantities based on current activity levels. Backlog
will not necessarily result in future revenue because firm
orders may be cancelled, firm orders from governmental agencies
are subject to funding options, appropriations may not be
exercised by the customers, and the quantities ordered, the
volume of transaction processed or services to be provided may
be less than estimated. Backlog includes deferred revenues.
Contractual arrangements could be cancelled by customers without
penalty for lack of performance. Contracts terminated by
customers for convenience generally would result in recovery of
actual costs incurred and profit, if any, on work performed
through the date of cancellation.
At December 31, 2010 backlog attributable to continuing
operations, determined as described above, approximated
$0.9 billion of which approximately $282.0 million is
expected to be realized in 2011. Backlog at December 31,
2009 was $1.0 billion.
Manufacturing
L-1 engineers and designs the hardware products it sells, and
develops the software embedded in them. L-1 either concentrates
its manufacturing activities to the assembly, repair, and
testing of these products, or manages production through
contract manufacturers. In either case,
L-1 qualifies
suppliers for the core components which typically have
established supply chains.
L-1 believes
this permits rapid expansion of production capacity to meet any
significant increase in product demand and minimizes both
development costs and the cost of scaling of manufacturing
capabilities. L-1 believes that these costs will decline if
manufacturing volumes increase.
L-1 engineers, designs and produces most of the card products
used for the production of secure credentials that have
proprietary features
and/or
functionality and which account for over 60 percent of L-1
identity document volume. The remaining consumable materials are
purchased from established sources.
L-1 produces
driver licenses in 7 secure central issuance facilities in
Texas, Florida, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Indiana,
California, Georgia, and Washington. In 2010, the Company opened
a new central issuance facility in Massachusetts to accommodate
States converting, or expected to convert, to central issuance
in 2010 and 2011. L-1 also produces the Mexican voter
identification credentials in a central issuance facility in
Mexico City.
L-1 purchases certain components,
sub-assemblies
and finished products used in manufacturing and supply chain
operations from sole source suppliers. While L- 1 is careful to
partner with stable, reliable suppliers, the partial or complete
loss of supplies available from sole sources or limited sources
of supply, or the delay in receiving supplies from these sources
could result in delays in manufacturing and product shipments.
This may result in the assessment of liquidated damages in
certain contracts and may require the incurrence of development
and other costs to establish alternative sources of supply.
While L-1 makes every effort to maintain inventory of sole
sourced components at the appropriate level, it may take the
Company
10
several months to locate alternative suppliers if required, or
redesign products to accommodate components from different
suppliers.
Seasonality
In general, the L-1 business is not seasonal. However, L-1 is
impacted by the fiscal funding and appropriation cycles of major
customers. For example, the U.S. governments fiscal
year ends on September 30 of each year, and it is not uncommon
for government agencies to award extra tasks or complete other
contract actions in the weeks before the end of the fiscal year
in order to avoid the loss of unexpended fiscal year funds.
Moreover, in years when the U.S. government does not
complete its budget process before the end of its fiscal year,
government operations typically are funded pursuant to a
continuing resolution that authorizes agencies of the
U.S. government to continue to operate, but traditionally
does not authorize new spending initiatives. When much of the
U.S. government operates under a continuing resolution,
delays can occur in procurement of products and services, and
such delays can affect
L-1 revenue
and profit during the period of delay.
Financial
Information About Foreign And Domestic Operations and Export
Sales
For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008,
foreign and export sales from continuing operations were
approximately $70.8 million, $56.0 million, and
$47.7 million, respectively.
Foreign operations and export sales may increase in relative and
absolute terms in the future due to L-1s increased focus
on markets outside the United States. See Note 12 to
L-1s consolidated financial statements for additional
information.
Reportable
Segments and Geographic Information
See Note 12 of Consolidated Financial Statements provided
in response to Item 8 of this annual report on
Form 10-K.
Recent
Acquisitions
Except for the acquisition of assets from Retica Systems, during
2010, L-1 did not consummate any acquisitions. See Note 13
of L-1s Consolidated Financial Statements provided in
response to Item 8 of this annual report on
Form 10-K.
Capital
Requirements
L-1s most significant capital requirements arise primarily
from acquisitions in support of its business strategy, capital
expenditures for new secure credentialing contracts,
expenditures for research and development and working capital
needs. For example, L-1 must commit to provide up-front capital
expenditures in order to install systems necessary to perform
when bidding on new State drivers license contracts. The
most significant capital expenditures are related to the Secure
Credentialing business, which has increased in size and scope
due to the acquisition of the ID Systems business of Digimarc
Corporation (Old Digimarc) in August 2008. In 2010,
L-1s capital expenditures were $45.0 million compared
to $55.0 million in 2009 and are expected to approximate
$40.0 million in 2011. L-1 expects capital expenditures to
decline in 2012, as it completes the build out of systems for
recently awarded contracts.
L-1 expects to meet L-1s capital requirements from
operating cash flows and financing arrangements. See
Item 7, Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Environmental
Protection Regulations
L-1 believes that compliance with Federal, State and Local
environmental regulations will not have a material adverse
effect on the Companys financial position or results of
operations.
11
Employees
As of December 31, 2010, L-1 had 1,352 full time employees
in its continued operations and 1,086 employees in its
discontinued operations. No employees are covered by collective
bargaining agreements. The Company believes that its relations
with employees are good.
Officers
L-1 executive officers are appointed by the Board of Directors
and serve until their successors have been duly appointed and
qualified.
Robert V. LaPenta, 65, has served as the Chairman of the
Board since December 2005, President and Chief Executive Officer
of
L-1 since
August 2006. Mr. LaPenta is the founder and Chief Executive
Officer of
L-1 Investment
Partners, LLC, a private investment management firm. From April
1997 to April 2005, Mr. LaPenta served as President, Chief
Financial Officer and a Director of L-3 Communications Holdings,
Inc., which he co-founded in April 1997. From April 1996 when
Loral Corporation was acquired by Lockheed Martin Corporation,
until April 1997, Mr. LaPenta was a Vice President of
Lockheed Martin and was Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of Lockheed Martins Command, Control,
Communications and Intelligence and Systems Integration Sector.
Prior to the April 1996 acquisition of Loral, he was
Lorals Senior Vice President and Controller, a position he
held since 1991. He joined Loral in 1972 and was named Vice
President and Controller of its largest division in 1974. He
became Corporate Controller in 1978 and was named Vice President
in 1979. Mr. LaPenta is on the Board of Trustees of Iona
College, the board of directors of Core Software Technologies
and the board of directors of Leap Wireless International, Inc.
Dr. Joseph Atick, 46, joined L-1 in August 2006 as
Executive Vice President and Chief Strategic Officer effective
with the merger of Identix with
L-1. Prior
to that, he served as President & Chief Officer of
Identix since June of 2002. Prior to that, he had co-founded one
of the original facial recognition companies, Visionics
Corporation. Over the years, Dr. Atick co-founded and
managed several companies focused on technology transfer and
development, and has served as a technical advisor to many
high-tech enterprises and organizations, including NATO. He had
also led the Computational Neuroscience Laboratory at
Rockefeller University and the Neural Cybernetics Group at the
Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey.
Dr. Atick holds a Ph.D. in Mathematical Physics from
Stanford University.
James A. DePalma, 59, joined L-1 as Executive Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer effective with
the merger of Identix with L-1. He brings three decades of
operational and finance experience in the defense and technology
industries to his role within the Company. Prior to joining L-1,
Mr. DePalma was a founding partner of L-1 Investment
Partners. Prior to the formation of L-1 Investment Partners,
Mr. DePalma served as a consultant to L-3 Communications
Holdings, Inc. and was Chief Executive Officer of Core Software
Technology, a leading software provider to the intelligence
community and an equity investment of L-3 Communications
Holdings, Inc. Mr. DePalma has also held high level
executive positions with Westinghouse Electric Corporation,
CBS Corporation and Viacom International. He also was a
senior partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers.
Doni L. Fordyce, 51, joined L-l as Executive Vice
President of Corporate Communications effective with the merger
of Identix with L-1. Prior to August 2006, she was a founding
partner of L-1 Investment Partners and brings two decades of
senior executive and investment management experience to the
Company, serving most recently as Chief Executive Officer,
President and Chief Operation Officer of Bear Stearns Asset
Management (BSAM) Inc. Prior to that Ms. Fordyce was Vice
President of Goldman Sachs Inc. from 1986 to 1996 where she was
one of the founders of the asset management business. She has
also worked in IT solutions consulting, specializing networking,
data management and printing for investment banks and financial
institutions.
Mark S. Molina, 51, joined L-1 in August 2006 as
Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary in
August 2006 effective with the merger of Identix with L-1. Prior
to joining L-1, he was Executive Vice President, Chief Legal
Officer and Secretary at Identix, which he joined as Vice
President and General Counsel in 1999. Mr. Molina is a
business and technology lawyer with over 20 years
experience structuring
12
and negotiating mergers, acquisition, dispositions, joint
ventures, technology licenses, financings and investments. He
has considerable experience with public offerings and private
placements as well as SEC reporting compliance and obligations
of publicly traded companies.
Joseph Paresi, 55, joined L-1 in August 2006 as Executive
Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer effective with the
merger of Identix with L-1. He was a founding partner of L-1
Investment Partners LLC. Mr. Paresi brings three decades of
executive management, product development, and design
engineering experience in the technology and defense industries
to his role with the Company. Prior to joining
L-1 Investment
Partners, he served as Corporate Vice President of product
development for L-3 Communications and as President of L-3
Security & Detection Systems from 1997 to 2005.
Vincent A. DAngelo, 66, joined L-1 as Senior Vice
President of Finance in August 2006 effective with the merger of
Identix with L-1. Prior to that, he was a consultant for L-1
Investment Partners. Prior to that, Mr. DAngelo was a
Senior Audit Partner with PricewaterhouseCoopers for more than
35 years where he was involved in all facets of the
business, including client service, management, operations,
governance, SEC filings, and mergers and acquisitions.
There are no family relationships among any of
L-1s
executive officers and directors.
On April 23, 2007, the Company entered into an employee
arrangement with Mr. Robert LaPenta, Jr., the son of
the Companys Chief Executive Officer, to serve as Vice
President, M&A/Corporate Development.
Internet
Website
L-1 maintains a corporate website with the address www.L1id.com.
Its intended use is as a regular means of disclosing material
non-public information and for complying with disclosure
obligations under Regulation FD promulgated by the SEC.
Such disclosures will be included on the website under the
heading Investor Relations Events and
Presentations. Accordingly, investors should monitor such
portions of the website, in addition to following the
Companys press releases, SEC filings and public conference
calls and webcasts.
L-1 is not incorporating information contained in the website by
reference into this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The Company makes available, free of charge through the website,
its Annual Reports on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
and Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
and any amendments to these reports as soon as reasonably
practicable after electronically filing such material with, or
furnishing such material to, the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Materials filed with the SEC can be read and copies made at the
SECs Public Reference Room at 100 F Street,
N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information about the Public Reference Room. The SEC
also maintains a website, www.sec.gov containing the
reports, proxy and other information filed with the SEC.
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
contains or incorporates a number of forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of
1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. These forward-looking statements are based on current
expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about the
industry and markets in which L-1 operates and managements
beliefs and assumptions. Any statements contained herein
(including without limitation statements to the effect that
management, we or L-1 believes, expects,
anticipates, plans and similar
expressions) that are not statements of historical fact should
be considered forward-looking statements and should be read in
conjunction with consolidated financial statements and notes to
consolidated financial statements included in this report. These
statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve
certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult
to predict. There are a number of important factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated
by such forward-looking statements. These factors include,
without limitation, those set forth below. The risks and
uncertainties described below are not the only ones L-1 faces.
Additional risks and uncertainties, including those not
presently known to L-1 or that the Company currently deems
immaterial,
13
may also impair the business. L-1 expressly disclaims any
obligation to update any forward-looking statements, except as
may be required by law.
Business
Risks
There are risks and uncertainties associated with the Safran
transaction.
There are risks and uncertainties associated with the Safran
transaction, including that such transaction may not be
consummated, or may not be consummated as currently anticipated,
as a result of several potential risks, including but not
limited to: (i) the inability to obtain approval in respect
of the Committee on Foreign Review in the United States or to
obtain such approval without conditions that are not currently
anticipated; or (ii) the failure to satisfy the other
conditions for closing set forth in the Merger Agreement.
Under certain circumstances, if the Merger Agreement with Safran
is terminated, we may be required to pay Safran a termination
fee of $25.0 million or reimburse Safran for up to
$12.5 million of Safrans documented
out-of-pocket
expenses. If the merger agreement is terminated and all
conditions to the consummation of the merger transaction have
been satisfied other than those conditions related to regulatory
approvals (and those to be satisfied immediately prior to the
closing), Safran has agreed to pay the Company a termination fee
of $75.0 million.
Lawsuits have been filed and other lawsuits may be filed against
us and Safran challenging the Safran merger and seeking, among
other things, injunctive relief enjoining the Safran
transaction, and an adverse ruling in any such lawsuit may
prevent the Safran transaction from being completed. See
Item 3, Legal Proceedings.
Because we have consummated the BAE transaction, if we fail to
consummate the merger with Safran, we will be required to
continue to operate the Company without the Intel Business,
which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of
operations and share price.
Our
business could be adversely impacted as a result of uncertainty
related to the Safran transaction.
The Safran transaction (including the risks and uncertainties
related to the consummation of the transaction) could cause
disruptions in our business, which could have an adverse effect
on our results of operations and financial condition. Our
employees may experience uncertainty about their future roles at
the Company, which might adversely affect our ability to retain
and hire key managers and other employees. Our customers and
suppliers may experience uncertainty about the Companys
future and may seek alternative business relationships with
third parties or seek to alter their business relationships with
the Company. In addition, the attention of our management may be
directed to transaction-related considerations and may be
diverted from the
day-to-day
operations of our business. The occurrence of any of these
events, individually or in combination, could adversely affect
our financial condition, results of operations and share price.
The Merger Agreement also restricts us from engaging in certain
activities and taking certain actions without Safrans
approval, which could adversely affect our ability to manage our
operations effectively in light of changes in economic or market
conditions or to execute our business strategy or prevent us
from pursuing opportunities or other strategic alternatives that
may arise prior to the closing of the transaction.
We have incurred, and will continue to incur, significant fees
for professional services and other transaction costs in
connection with the merger with Safran, and many of these fees
and costs are payable by us regardless of whether we consummate
the transaction. In addition, our stock price rose upon
announcement of the proposed merger with Safran and any failure
to consummate the merger could result in a drop in our stock
price.
L-1 has a
history of operating losses.
L-1 has a history of operating losses before income taxes. The
business operations began in 1993 and, except for 1996 and 2000,
have resulted in losses before income taxes in each year, which
have included significant asset impairments, amortization of
intangible assets and stock-based compensation expense, and in
14
2010 strategic alternative costs. At December 31, 2010, L-1
had an accumulated deficit of approximately $643.9 million.
L-1 will continue to invest in the development of secure
credential and biometric technologies, as well as government
services and will make significant capital expenditures to meet
the requirements of recently awarded secure credentialing
contracts. The need for these expenditures to grow the business
will affect the ability to report operating profit and reduce
the accumulated deficit.
Over
94 percent of L-1 revenue from continuing operations is
derived from government contracts which are often non-standard,
involve competitive bidding, may be subject to cancellation with
or without penalty and may produce volatility in earnings and
revenue.
More than 94 percent of L-1s continuing business
involves providing solutions and services under contracts with
U.S. Federal, State, Local and foreign government agencies.
Obtaining contracts from government agencies is challenging and
government contracts often include provisions that are not
standard in commercial transactions.
For example, government contracts may:
|
|
|
|
|
Include provisions that allow the government agency to
unilaterally terminate the contract without penalty under some
circumstances.
|
|
|
|
Be subject to purchasing decisions of agencies that are subject
to political considerations.
|
|
|
|
Include bonding requirements.
|
|
|
|
Be subject to onerous procurement procedures.
|
|
|
|
Be subject to cancellation or reduction if government funding
becomes unavailable or is cut back.
|
Securing government contracts can be a protracted process
involving competitive bidding. In many cases, unsuccessful
bidders may challenge contract awards, which can lead to
increased costs, delays and possible loss of the contract for
the winning bidder. Protests, and similar delays, regarding any
future government contracts of a material nature that may be
awarded to L-1 could result in materially adverse revenue
volatility, making management of inventory levels, cash flows
and profitability inherently difficult. Outright loss of any
material government contract through the protest process or
otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on financial
results and stock price.
In addition, government contracts may specify performance
criteria that must be satisfied before the customer accepts the
products and services. Collection of accounts receivable may be
dependent on meeting customer requirements, which may be
unpredictable, subject to change by the customer, and may be
misinterpreted by L-1 which could result in the incurrence of
unexpected costs that may be uncompensated and could negatively
affect profit margins and liquidity.
Government
contracts are subject to continued appropriations by Congress
and availability of funding for State and Local programs.
Reduced funding or changes in procurement policies that curtail
the use of outside contractors could result in terminated,
delayed or de-scoped contracts with L-1 and adversely affect the
ability for L-1 to meet sales and earnings goals.
For the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009,
U.S. Federal government agencies, directly or indirectly,
accounted for 36 percent and 39 percent of L-1
consolidated revenues from continuing operations, respectively.
Future sales under existing and future awards of
U.S. government contracts are conditioned upon the
continuing availability of Congressional appropriations, which
could be affected by current or future political and economic
conditions. Failure to approve budgets or raise debt limits may
result in a suspension of funding of government operations.
In addition, while spending authorizations defense-related
programs by the Federal government has increased in recent
years, particularly after the 2001 terrorist attacks and more
recently in support of U.S. war efforts in Southwest Asia,
future levels of expenditures, mission priorities and
authorizations for these programs may decrease, remain constant
or shift to programs in areas where L-1 does not currently
provide
15
products or services. Current Federal government spending levels
for defense-related programs are in part related to the
U.S. military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, and may
not be sustainable, as a result of changes in government
leadership, policies or priorities.
Similar to Federal government contracts, State and Local
government agency contracts may be contingent upon availability
and appropriation of funds provided by Federal, State or Local
entities. In the current economic and political environment,
States may reduce or suspend expenditures which may result in
cancellation or deferral of projects. State and Local law
enforcement and other government agencies are subject to
political, budgetary, purchasing and delivery constraints which
may result in quarterly and annual revenue and operating results
that may be irregular and difficult to predict. Such revenue
volatility makes management of inventory levels, cash flows and
profitability inherently difficult. In addition, if L-1 is
successful in winning such procurements, there may be unevenness
in delivery schedules, as well as potential delays and changes
in the timing of deliveries and recognition of revenue, or
cancellation of such procurements.
The full
amount of L-1 revenues reflected in backlog may not be realized,
which could harm operations and significantly reduce future
revenues.
There can be no assurances that backlog estimates will result in
actual revenues in any particular fiscal period because clients
may modify or terminate projects and contracts and may decide
not to exercise contract options or estimate of quantities may
not materialize.
L-1 backlog represents sales value of firm orders for products
and services not yet delivered and, for long term executed
contractual arrangements (contracts, subcontracts, and
customers commitments), the estimated future sales value
of estimated product shipments, transactions processed and
services to be provided over the term of the contractual
arrangements, including renewal options expected to be
exercised. For contracts with indefinite quantities backlog
reflects estimated quantities based on current activity levels.
Backlog includes estimates of revenues that are dependent on
future government appropriation, option exercise by clients
and/or is
subject to contract modification or termination. Due to current
economic environment and potential spending constraints
experienced by State and Local governments, in particular,
realization of backlog may be adversely impacted. At
December 31, 2010, L-1 backlog from continuing operations
was approximately $0.9 billion of which approximately
$282.0 million is expected to be realized in 2011. These
estimates are based on L-1 experience under such contracts and
similar contracts, and the Company believes such estimates to be
reasonable in the circumstances. However, L-1 believes that the
estimate of revenues reflected in backlog for the following
twelve months will generally be more reliable than the estimate
for periods thereafter.
If L-1 does not realize a substantial amount of backlog,
operations could be harmed and expected future revenues could be
significantly reduced.
Quarterly
results are difficult to predict due to factors including long
sales cycles; if quarterly financial expectations are missed,
the L-1 stock price could decline.
Quarterly revenue and operating results are difficult to predict
and fluctuate from quarter to quarter. The sales cycle for
solutions and services is typically long and subject to a number
of significant risks and potential delays over which the Company
has no or little control. While potential customers are
evaluating L-1 products, the Company may incur substantial
selling and marketing costs and expend significant management
resources in an effort to obtain sales order and contracts that
may never materialize. In addition, as operating expenses are
based on anticipated revenue levels, fluctuations in revenues as
a result of the timing of contract awards and the exercise of
options and task orders can cause operating results to vary
significantly between periods. Factors which may delay procuring
decisions include:
|
|
|
|
|
Time required for a prospective customer to recognize the need
for L-1 solutions.
|
|
|
|
Timing of appropriation of funds by governments.
|
|
|
|
Political and economic uncertainties.
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
Customer requirements for customized features and
functionalities.
|
|
|
|
Turnover of key personnel at existing and prospective customers.
|
|
|
|
Customer internal budgeting and processes.
|
|
|
|
Customer internal procedures for the approval of large contracts.
|
|
|
|
Protest processes affecting government contract awards which may
be initiated by competitors.
|
Due to the factors described above, operating results in some
periods may not meet investor expectations. If this happens, the
market price of L-1 common stock could be adversely impacted.
Fluctuations in future quarterly operating results may also be
caused by many other factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
The size and timing of new contract awards and customer orders
which may be received unevenly throughout a fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
The mix of revenues between solutions and services.
|
|
|
|
The application of new accounting standards or interpretations.
|
|
|
|
Cancellation or modification of contracts or changes in contract
revenue estimates.
|
|
|
|
Contract performance delays.
|
The
Company must fund substantial capital expenditures for the
secure credentialing business.
The installation of secure credentialing systems requires
significant capital expenditures. The need to fund such capital
expenditures increased following the 2008 acquisition of the
secure credentialing business of Digimarc.
For the year ended December 31, 2010, capital expenditures
were $45.0 million, as compared to $55.0 million in
the prior year. Capital expenditures are expected to approximate
$40.0 million for the year ending December 31, 2011.
While L-1 expects to fund capital requirements primarily from
operating cash flows and borrowings under its revolving credit
facility, in the near term, cash otherwise available to fund
strategic opportunities and repay long-term debt is reduced. At
December 31, 2010, L-1 had cash and cash equivalents of
$3.1 million and availability under its existing credit
agreement of $68.9 million, subject to continuing
compliance with covenants contained in the agreement. While the
Company believes it has adequate capital resources to meet
current working capital and capital expenditure requirements and
has been successful in the past in obtaining financing for
acquisitions, L-1 expects to have increased capital needs as it
continues to expand its business.
In addition, if the Safran transaction is not consummated, the
Company may be unsuccessful in raising additional financing to
fund growth or it may have difficulty in obtaining financing at
attractive rates or on terms that are not excessively dilutive
to existing shareholders. Failure to secure additional financing
in a timely manner and on favorable terms could have a material
adverse effect on its growth, financial performance and stock
price and could require the Company to delay or abandon
expansion.
Covenants
in the Companys credit facility may restrict financial and
operating flexibility and the Company may not be able to comply
with its financial covenants.
L-1 is a party to a credit agreement which, after the repayment
of the term loans in February 2011, provides for up to
$135.0 million in borrowings through 2013, of which
$68.9 million was available at December 31, 2010,
subject to continuing compliance with debt covenants. Under the
agreement, L-1 is required to maintain specific financial
covenants related to leverage and debt service coverages as of
the end of each fiscal quarter. On August 30, 2010, L-1
entered into an amendment and consent (the Third
Amendment) to the Second Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement dated as of August 5, 2008, among L-1 Identity
Solutions Operating Company, the Company, Bank of America, N.A.,
the Lenders party thereto, Wachovia Bank, National Association,
Banc of America Securities LLC and Wachovia Capital Markets LLC
(as amended, the Credit Agreement). The Third
Amendment extended the time period during which
17
previously modified financial covenants will apply under the
Credit Agreement due to the Company having entered into a
definitive agreement providing for the sale of all or
substantially all of the assets and operations of the Company
and its subsidiaries in connection with its strategic
alternatives review on September 19, 2010. The Third
Amendment provides that L-1 must maintain the minimum
Consolidated Debt Service Coverage Ratio of 1.65 to 1.00 as of
the end of the fourth fiscal quarter of 2010, after which L-1
must maintain a minimum Consolidated Debt Service Coverage Ratio
of 2.25 to 1.00 as of the end of each fiscal quarter thereafter,
and L-1 must maintain a maximum Consolidated Leverage Ratio of
3.85 to 1.00 as of the end of the fourth fiscal quarter of 2010,
after which L-1 must maintain a maximum Consolidated Leverage
Ratio shall return to 2.75 to 1.00 for each fiscal quarter
thereafter.
At December 31, 2010 the Companys Consolidated Debt
Service Coverage Ratio was 1.79:1.00 and the Consolidated
Leverage Ratio was 3.50:1.00; accordingly the Company was in
compliance with the modified financial covenants. After giving
effect to the sale of the Intel Businesses to BAE and the
required prepayment of L-1s term loan facility using the
net proceeds of such sale, the Company believes it will achieve
compliance with the financial covenants applicable in the first
quarter of 2011 and thereafter. The ability to satisfy these
financial ratios in the future can be affected by events beyond
the Companys control and it cannot assure meeting these
ratios. If the merger with Safran does not occur, the Company
expects to refinance its debt on a long term basis or otherwise
take other actions to repay or amend the term loans and other
debt. There is no assurance that a refinancing or other action
to repay or modify the loan can be successfully executed.
The credit agreement also places limitations on additional
borrowings, mergers and related-party transactions, on payment
of dividends and with respect to capital expenditures.
Borrowings under the agreement are collateralized by
Companys assets and bear interest at the Eurodollar Rate,
or the lenders base rate, plus market-rate spreads that
are determined by reference to the Companys leverage ratio.
Default under the credit facility could allow the lenders to
declare all amounts outstanding to be immediately due and
payable. L-1 has pledged substantially all of its assets to
secure the debt under the credit facility. If the lenders
declare amounts outstanding under the credit facility to be due,
the lenders could proceed against those assets. Any event of
default, therefore, could have a material adverse effect on the
business if the creditors determine to exercise their rights.
The Company also may incur future debt obligations that might
subject L-1 to restrictive covenants that could affect financial
and operational flexibility, restrict ability to pay dividends
on common stock, or subject L-1 to other events of default.
L-1 is
subject to government regulation and failure to comply with
applicable regulations could subject the Company to penalties
that may restrict its ability to conduct business.
L-1 is affected by and must comply with various government
regulations that impact operating costs, profit margins and the
internal organization and operation of the business.
Failure to comply with applicable regulations, rules and
approvals could result in the imposition of penalties, the loss
of government contracts or disqualification as a
U.S. government contractor, all of which could adversely
affect the business, financial condition and results of
operations. Among the most significant regulations affecting the
business are:
|
|
|
|
|
Export control regulations.
|
|
|
|
Federal Acquisition Regulation, or the FAR, and agency
regulations supplementing the FAR, which comprehensively
regulate the formation and administration of, and performance
under government contracts.
|
|
|
|
Truth in Negotiations Act that requires certification and
disclosure of all cost and pricing data in connection with
contract negotiations.
|
|
|
|
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
|
|
|
|
Laws, regulations and executive orders restricting the use and
dissemination of information classified for national security
purposes and the exportation of certain products and technical
data.
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
Laws and regulation established to protect the privacy and
personal information of employees and third parties.
|
These regulations affect how L-1 and its customers do business
and, in some instances, impose added costs to L-1. Any changes
in applicable laws and regulations could restrict the ability
for L-1 to conduct business. Any failure by L-1 to comply with
applicable laws and regulations could result in contract
termination, price or fee reductions or suspension, debarment or
disqualification from contracting with the Federal, State and
Local governments.
The
Company could be adversely affected by a negative audit by the
U.S. government.
U.S. government agencies, including the Defense Contract
Audit Agency and various agency Inspectors General, routinely
audit and investigate government contractors. These agencies
review a contractors performance under its contracts, cost
structure and compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and
standards. The U.S. government also reviews the adequacy
of, and a contractors compliance with, its internal
control systems and policies, including the contractors
management, purchasing, property, estimating, compensation,
accounting, and information systems. If an audit or
investigation uncovers improper or illegal activities, L-1 may
be subject to civil or criminal penalties and administrative
sanctions, including termination of contracts, forfeiture of
profits, suspension of payments, fines, and suspension or
prohibition from doing business with the U.S. government.
In addition, L-1 could suffer serious reputational harm if
allegations of impropriety were made.
Biometric
technologies have not yet achieved widespread commercial
acceptance and the strategy of expanding the biometric business
could adversely affect L-1 business operations and financial
conditions.
L-1s strategy includes the enhancement of the
Companys leadership in biometric technologies. Pursuing
this strategy involves risks. For example, to date biometric
technologies have not yet gained widespread commercial
acceptance. Although there has been more commercial activity
recently, there is no assurance that this activity will continue
or expand. Some of the obstacles to the use of biometric
technologies include a perceived loss of privacy and public
perceptions as to the usefulness of biometric solutions. Whether
the market for biometric technologies and solutions expands is
dependent upon factors such as:
|
|
|
|
|
National or international events which may affect the need for
or interest in biometric solutions or services.
|
|
|
|
The cost, performance and reliability of the solutions and
services and those of the competition.
|
|
|
|
Customer perception of the perceived benefit of biometric
solutions and services and satisfaction with solutions and
services.
|
|
|
|
Public perceptions regarding the confidentiality of private
information.
|
|
|
|
Proposed or enacted legislation related to privacy of
information.
|
|
|
|
Marketing efforts and publicity regarding these solutions and
services.
|
|
|
|
Competition from non-biometric technologies that provide more
affordable, but less robust, authentication (such as tokens and
smart cards).
|
|
|
|
Privacy and legal challenges relating to biometric identifiers
driven by private citizens and advocacy groups.
|
|
|
|
The potential for changes in government policy regarding privacy
issues with a new executive branch administration.
|
L-1 does not know when, if ever, biometric solutions and
services will gain widespread commercial acceptance. Certain
groups have publicly objected to the use of biometric solutions
and services for some applications on civil liberties grounds
and legislation has been proposed to regulate the use of
biometric security solutions. Biometric technologies have been
the focus of organizations and individuals seeking to
19
curtail or eliminate such technologies on the grounds that they
may be used to diminish personal privacy rights. If such
initiatives result in restrictive legislation, the market for
biometric solutions may be adversely affected. Even if biometric
technologies gain wide market acceptance, L-1 biometric
solutions and services may not adequately address the
requirements of the market and may not gain widespread
commercial acceptance.
L-1 faces
intense competition that could result in lower revenues and
higher R&D expenditures and could adversely affect results
of the Companys operations.
Since the events of September 11, 2001 regulatory and
policy changes in the U.S. and abroad have heightened
interest in the use of biometric security solutions, and L-1
expects competition in this field, which is already substantial,
to intensify.
Competitors are developing and marketing semiconductor
ultrasonic and optically based direct contact fingerprint image
capture devices, or retinal blood vessel, iris pattern, hand
geometry, voice or various types of facial structure solutions.
L-1 solutions also compete with non-biometric technologies which
may be less costly, such as certificate authorities and
traditional keys, cards, surveillance systems and passwords.
Widespread adoption of one or more of these technologies or
approaches in the markets targeted could significantly reduce
the potential market for L-1 systems and solutions.
Some competitors have significantly more resources than L-1.
Competitors may introduce products that are more price
competitive, have increased performance or functionality or
incorporate technological advances that L-1 has not yet
developed or implemented. To remain competitive, L-1 must
continue to develop, market and sell new and enhanced solutions
at competitive prices, which will require significant research
and development expenditures. If L-1 does not develop new and
enhanced solutions or if the Company is not able to invest
adequately in research and development activities, the business,
financial condition and results of operations could be severely
and negatively impacted.
L-1 must
keep pace with changing technologies or risk losing existing and
new customers.
In order to compete effectively in the biometrics market, L-1
must continually design, develop and market new and enhanced
products. Future success will depend, in part, upon the
Companys ability to address the changing and sophisticated
needs of customers. Frequently, technical development programs
in the biometric industry require assessments to be made of the
future directions of technology and technology markets
generally, which are inherently risky and difficult to predict.
L-1 may not be able to accurately predict which technologies
customers will support. If the Company fails to choose correctly
among technical directions, or fail to offer innovative
solutions at competitive prices in a timely manner, customers
may forego purchases of
L-1
solutions and purchase those of competitors.
Security
breaches in systems sold or maintained by L-1 could result in
the disclosure of sensitive government information or private
personal information that could result in the loss of customers
and negative publicity.
Many of the systems included in L-1 solutions manage private
personal information and protect information involved in
sensitive government functions. The protective security measures
that are used in these systems may not prevent security
breaches, and failure to prevent security breaches may disrupt
business, damage reputation, and expose L-1 to litigation and
liability. A party that is able to circumvent protective
security measures used in these systems could misappropriate
sensitive or proprietary information or cause interruptions or
otherwise damage L-1 products, services and reputation, and the
property and privacy of customers. If unintended parties obtain
sensitive data and information, or create bugs or viruses or
otherwise sabotage the functionality of systems, L-1 may receive
negative publicity, incur liability to customers or lose the
confidence of customers, any of which may cause the termination
or modification of contracts. Further, insurance coverage may be
insufficient to cover losses and liabilities that may result
from such events.
L-1 may be required to expend significant capital and other
resources to protect the Company against the threat of security
breaches or to alleviate problems caused by the occurrence of
any such breaches. In addition,
20
protective or remedial measures may not be available at a
reasonable price or at all, or may not be entirely effective.
Reliance
on external suppliers and contract manufacturers may result in
delays and loss of sales or customers.
The lead-time for ordering certain products and materials and
for building many of L-1 products included in the Companys
solutions can be many months. As a result, L-1 must order such
products and materials based on forecasted demand. If demand for
solutions lags significantly behind forecasts, L-1 may purchase
more products than the Company can sell, resulting in increased
cash needs and write-downs of obsolete or excess inventory. In
addition, if the delivered product purchases are delayed, the
Company may lose customers and sales.
L-1 relies on contract manufacturers to produce hardware
products under short term manufacturing arrangements. Although
L-1 believes it can find alternative sources for the
manufacturing of hardware, any disruption of contractual
arrangements could result in delaying deliveries or in the loss
of sales. The Company obtains certain hardware and services, as
well as software applications, from a limited group of
suppliers. The reliance on these suppliers involves risks,
including reduced control over quality and delivery schedules.
Any financial instability of suppliers could result in having to
find new suppliers. L-1 may experience delays in manufacturing
and deliveries of products and services to customers if the
Company loses its sources or if supplies and services delivered
from these sources are delayed, which could result in the loss
of sales or customers.
The
market for L-1 solutions is still developing and if the
biometrics industry adopts standards or a platform different
from L-1s, then the Companys competitive position
would be negatively affected.
The market for identity solutions is still developing. The
evolution of this market may result in the development of
different technologies and industry standards that are not
compatible with L-1s current solutions, products or
technologies.
Several organizations, such as the International Civil Aviation
Organization, sets standards for travel documents that its
member States then put into effect, and the National Institute
for Standards and Testing, which is part of the
U.S. Department of Commerce, set standards for biometrics
to be used in identification and documentation. Although L-1
believes that its biometric technologies comply with existing
standards for finger, face and iris recognition, these standards
may change and any standards adopted could prove disadvantageous
to or incompatible with the L-1 business model and current or
future solutions, products and services.
The L-1
plan to pursue sales in international markets may be limited by
risks related to conditions in such markets.
For the year ended December 31, 2010, L-1 derived
approximately 16 percent of total revenues of continuing
operations from international sales and the Companys
strategy is to expand its international operations. There is a
risk that the Company may not be able to successfully market,
sell and deliver solutions, products and services in foreign
countries.
Risks inherent in marketing, selling and delivering products in
foreign and international markets, each of which could have a
severe negative impact on financial results and stock price,
include those associated with:
|
|
|
|
|
Regional economic or political conditions.
|
|
|
|
Delays in or absolute prohibitions on exporting solutions,
products and services resulting from export restrictions for
certain products and technologies.
|
|
|
|
Loss of, or delays in importing products, services and
intellectual property developed abroad, resulting from unstable
or fluctuating social, political or governmental conditions.
|
|
|
|
Fluctuations in foreign currencies related to the
U.S. dollar.
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
Loss of revenue, property (including intellectual property) and
equipment from expropriation, nationalization, war,
insurrection, terrorism, criminal acts and other political and
social risks.
|
|
|
|
Liabilities resulting from any unauthorized actions of local
resellers or agents under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act or
local anti-corruption statutes.
|
|
|
|
Overlap of different tax structures.
|
|
|
|
Risks of increases in taxes and other government fees.
|
|
|
|
Involuntary renegotiations of contracts with foreign governments.
|
L-1 expects that it will have increased exposure to foreign
currency fluctuations. As of December 31, 2010, accumulated
other comprehensive gain includes foreign currency translation
gains of approximately $0.7 million.
In addition, L-1 has significant Japanese Yen denominated
transactions with Japanese suppliers of hardware and consumables
for the delivery to customers. Fluctuations in foreign
currencies, including the Japanese Yen, Canadian Dollar, Indian
Rupee and the Euro could result in unexpected fluctuations to
results of operations, which could be material and adverse.
If L-1
does not successfully expand direct sales and services
organizations and partnering arrangements, the Company may not
be able to increase sales to meet L-1s growth
expectations.
L-1 services are sold and licensed through the Companys
direct business development and sales organization. Future
success depends on substantially increasing the size and scope
of the direct business development and sales force and
partnering arrangements, both domestically and internationally.
L-1 may face intense competition for personnel, and the Company
cannot guarantee that it will be able to attract, assimilate or
retain additional qualified business development and sales
personnel on a timely basis.
Moreover, given the large-scale deployment required by some
customers, L-1 may need to hire and retain a number of highly
trained customer service and support personnel. The Company
cannot guarantee that it will be able to increase the size of
the customer service and support organization on a timely basis
to provide the high quality of support required by its
customers. The ability to add additional business development
and sales and customer service personnel could result in
customer dissatisfaction and loss of customers.
The
Company relies in part upon system integrators, Original
Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) and distribution partners to sell
some L-1 solutions, technologies and services; the Company may
be adversely affected if those parties do not actively promote
the products or pursue installations that do not use L-1
solutions, technologies and services.
A portion of L-1 revenue comes from sales to partners including
OEMs, systems integrators, distributors and resellers. Some of
these relationships have not been formalized in a detailed
contract, and may be subject to termination at any time. Even
where these relationships are formalized in a detailed contract,
the agreements can often be terminated with little or no notice
and subject to periodic amendment.
L-1 intends to continue to seek strategic relationships to
distribute, license and sell certain of L-1 products. However
the Company may not be able to negotiate acceptable
relationships in the future and cannot predict whether current
or future relationships will be successful.
If
solutions, systems and products are not delivered in a timely
fashion or do not perform as promised, L-1 could experience
increased costs, lower margins, liquidated damage payment
obligations and reputational harm.
L-1 often provides complex systems that are required to operate
in difficult or sensitive circumstances. The development of such
complex systems may be subject to delays or failure to meet
performance requirements to customer specifications. The
negative effects of any delay or failure to deliver to meet
performance requirements could be exacerbated if the delay or
failure occurs in systems that provide personal
22
security, secure sensitive computer data, authorize significant
financial transactions or perform other functions where a
security breach could have significant consequences.
If a product launch is delayed or is the subject of an
availability shortage because of problems with the
Companys ability to manufacture or assemble the product
successfully on a timely basis, or if a product or service
otherwise fails to meet performance criteria, L-1 may lose
revenue opportunities entirely
and/or
experience delays in revenue recognition associated with a
product or service in addition to incurring higher operating
expenses during the period required to correct the defects.
There is a risk that for unforeseen reasons L-1 may be required
to repair or replace a substantial number of systems in use or
to reimburse customers for systems that fail to work or meet
strict performance criteria. From time to time, in certain
critical or complex sale or licensing transactions, L-1 may be
compelled to accept liability provisions that vary from the
Companys preferred contracting model. There is a risk that
in certain contracts and circumstances L-1 may not be successful
in adequately minimizing product and related liabilities or that
the protections negotiated will not ultimately be deemed
enforceable. L-1 carries product liability insurance, but
existing coverage may not be adequate to cover potential claims.
Although the Company will deploy
back-up
systems, the failure of products to perform as promised could
result in increased costs, lower margins, liquidated damage
payment obligations and harm to reputation. This could result in
contract terminations and have a material adverse effect on
business and financial results.
Failure
to maintain the proprietary nature of L-1 technology,
intellectual property and manufacturing processes could have a
material adverse affect on the business and the Companys
ability to effectively compete.
L-1 principally relies upon patent, trademark, copyright, trade
secret and contract law to establish and protect proprietary
rights. There is a risk that claims allowed on any patents or
trademarks held by L-1 may not be broad enough to protect the
Companys technology. In addition, patents or trademarks
may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented and L-1 cannot be
certain that the rights granted there under will provide
competitive advantages.
Moreover, any current or future issued or licensed patents, or
trademarks, or currently existing or future developed trade
secrets or know-how may not afford sufficient protection against
competitors with similar technologies or processes, and the
possibility exists that certain of already issued patents or
trademarks may infringe upon third party patents or trademarks
or be designed around by others.
In addition, there is a risk that others may independently
develop proprietary technologies and processes, which are the
same as, substantially equivalent or superior to L-1, or become
available in the market at a lower price.
L-1 may be required to expend significant resources to monitor
and protect intellectual property rights. The Company may have
to litigate to enforce patents or trademarks or to determine the
scope and validity of other parties proprietary rights.
Litigation could be very costly and divert managements
attention. An adverse outcome in any litigation may have a
severe negative effect on financial results and stock price.
To determine the priority of inventions, L-1 may participate in
interference proceedings declared by the United States Patent
and Trademark Office or oppositions in foreign patent and
trademark offices, which could result in substantial cost and
limitations on the scope or validity of patents or trademarks.
In addition, foreign laws treat the protection of proprietary
rights differently from laws in the United States and may not
protect proprietary rights to the same extent as U.S. laws.
The failure of foreign laws or judicial systems to adequately
protect L-1s proprietary rights or intellectual property,
including intellectual property developed on the Companys
behalf by foreign contractors or subcontractors may have a
material adverse effect on the L-1 business, operations,
financial results and stock price.
23
Legal
claims regarding infringement by L-1 or suppliers of third party
intellectual property rights could result in substantial costs,
diversion of managerial resources and reputational
harm.
Although L-1 believes that its solutions, products and services
do not infringe currently existing and validly issued
intellectual property rights of others, the Company might not be
able to defend successfully against a third-party infringement
claim. A successful infringement claim against L-1, its
customers or suppliers could subject the Company to:
|
|
|
|
|
Liability for damages and litigation costs, including
attorneys fees.
|
|
|
|
Lawsuits that prevent L-1 from further use of the intellectual
property.
|
|
|
|
License intellectual property from a third party that could
include significant licensing fees.
|
|
|
|
Develop a non-infringing alternative which could be costly and
delay projects.
|
|
|
|
Indemnify clients with respect to losses incurred as a result of
the alleged infringement.
|
|
|
|
Establish alternative sources for products supplied to L-1 by
third parties.
|
Failure to prevail against any third party infringement claim
could have a material adverse effect on the business and
financial results. Even if L-1 is not found liable in a claim
for intellectual property infringement, such a claim could
result in substantial costs, diversion of resources and
management attention, termination of customer contracts and harm
to the Companys reputation.
L-1 faces
inherent product liability or other liability risks that could
result in large claims against the Company.
L-1 has inherent risk of exposure to product liability and other
liability claims resulting from the use of its products,
especially to the extent customers may depend on L-1 products in
public safety situations that may involve physical harm or even
death to individuals, as well as exposure to potential loss or
damage to property. Despite quality control systems and
inspection, there remains an ever-present risk of an accident
resulting from a faulty manufacture or maintenance of products,
or an act of an agent outside of the Companys or
suppliers control. Even if L-1 products perform properly,
the Company may become subject to claims and costly litigation
due to the catastrophic nature of the potential injury and loss.
A product liability claim, or other legal claims based on
theories including personal injury or wrongful death, made
against L-1 could adversely affect operations and financial
condition. Although L-1 may have insurance to cover product
liability claims, the amount of coverage may not be sufficient.
L-1 is
dependent on a small number of individuals and if the Company
loses key personnel, the business will be adversely
affected.
If the Safran transaction is not completed, much of L-1s
future success depends on the continued service and availability
of senior management, including the Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer, Robert V. LaPenta, and
other members of the executive team. These individuals have
acquired specialized knowledge and skills with regards to
advanced technology identity solutions. The loss of any of these
individuals could severely harm the business. L-1 also is highly
dependent on the ability to retain, hire and motivate talented
highly skilled personnel. Experienced personnel in the advanced
technology identity solutions industry are in high demand and
competition for their talents is intense. If L-1 is unable to
successfully attract, retain and motivate key personnel, the
business may be severely harmed.
If L-1
fails to recruit and retain skilled employees or employees with
the necessary security clearances, the Company may not be able
to perform under government services contracts or win new
business.
To be competitive, L-1 must have employees with advanced
information technology and technical services skills that work
well with customers in a government or defense-related
environment. Often, these employees require some of the highest
security clearances in the United States. These employees are in
great demand and are likely to remain a limited resource in the
foreseeable future. If L-1 is unable to recruit and
24
retain a sufficient number of these employees, the ability to
maintain and grow the business could be negatively impacted.
Certain
L-1 shareholders have significant relationships with the
Company that could result in actions taken that are not
supported by unaffiliated shareholders.
In connection with the Aston investment in the Company, Aston
became the largest shareholder of L-1, currently owning
approximately 8.1 percent of L-1s outstanding common
stock. As a result, Aston (together with its affiliate, L-1
Investment Partners LLC) has an influence on matters
requiring approval by shareholders, including the election of
directors and most corporate actions, such as mergers and
acquisitions. In addition, L-1 has significant relationships
within L-1 Investment Partners LLC and Aston including
Mr. Robert V. LaPenta, founder and Chief Executive Officer
of L-1 Investments Partners LLC who is Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer and President of L-1.
Mr. James DePalma, Mr. Joseph Paresi and Ms. Doni
Fordyce are affiliates of L-1 Investment Partners LLC and Aston,
serve as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing and Sales
Officer, and Executive Vice President of Corporate
Communications, respectively.
L-1 has entered into certain transactions with Aston, L-1
Investment Partners and Mr. LaPenta, including a sublease
of office space from L-1 Investment Partners, an agreement in
principle to purchase a portfolio Company of Aston at fair
market value (if and as approved by the Board of Directors), and
a private placement issuance of securities to Mr. LaPenta
in connection with his participation in L-1s
$120 million private placement to fund in part the
acquisition of the ID Systems business of Digimarc. See
Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements,
Related Party Transactions for a more detailed
description of these transactions.
Mr. LaPenta also has a significant personal investment in
L-1 common stock through his controlling interest in Aston and
his direct ownership which, at December 31, 2010 considered
in the aggregate, represented beneficial ownership of
approximately 14.6 percent of the outstanding L-1 common
stock. The concentration of large percentages of ownership in
any single shareholder, or in any series of single shareholders,
may influence the likelihood or timing of any change in control
of the Company. Additionally, the sale of a significant number
of shares in the open market by single shareholders or otherwise
could adversely affect the Companys stock price. In
connection with the Safran transaction, Mr. LaPenta and
Aston entered into a voting agreement under which they agreed to
vote all shares beneficially owned by them in favor of the
Safran transaction and not to transfer their shares other than
pursuant to the Safran transaction, in each case subject to
limited exceptions.
Acquisition
Related Risks
Integration
of acquired businesses may be difficult to achieve and will
consume significant financial and managerial resources, which
may adversely affect operations.
The L-1 operating philosophy is to let acquired businesses
operate in an autonomous manner subject to corporate oversight
but integrating and rationalizing duplicative functions to
achieve revenue and cost synergies. The Company may encounter
substantial difficulties, costs and delays in integrating the
operations recently acquired and future acquisitions such as:
|
|
|
|
|
Exposure to unknown liabilities of acquired companies or assets.
|
|
|
|
Higher than anticipated acquisition costs and expenses.
|
|
|
|
Assumption of ongoing litigation matters that may be highly
complex and involve significant time, cost and expense.
|
|
|
|
Potential conflicts between business cultures.
|
|
|
|
Adverse changes in business focus perceived by third-party
constituencies.
|
|
|
|
Disruption of ongoing business.
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
Potential conflicts in distribution, marketing or other
important relationships.
|
|
|
|
Potential constraints of management resources.
|
|
|
|
Failure to maximize financial and strategic position by the
successful incorporation of acquired technology.
|
|
|
|
Failure to realize acquired technology potential, complete
product development, or obtain / secure appropriate
protection of intellectual property rights.
|
|
|
|
Loss of key employees
and/or the
diversion of managements attention from other ongoing
business concerns.
|
The geographic distance between acquired businesses and their
respective offices and operations increases the risk that the
integration will not be completed successfully or in a timely
and cost-effective manner. L-1 may not be successful in
overcoming these risks or any other problems encountered in
connection with the integration of the companies. The
simultaneous integration of these acquisitions may place
additional strain on L-1 resources and increase the risk that
business may be adversely affected by the disruption caused by
the acquisitions. The strategy contemplates acquiring additional
businesses, the integration of which may consume significant
financial and managerial resources, and could have a severe
negative impact on the business, financial condition and results
of operations.
Acquisitions
could result in future impairment and other charges, which could
adversely affect operational results.
L-1 recorded impairment charges aggregating $3.1 million in
2010 and $528.6 million in 2008 for goodwill and long-lived
assets, primarily related to the biometric businesses. At
December 31, 2010, goodwill, intangible assets and property
and equipment related to continuing operations amounted to
$700.3 million, $61.3 million and $126.2 million,
respectively. Because goodwill represents a residual after the
purchase price is allocated to the fair value of acquired assets
and liabilities, it is difficult to quantify the factors that
contribute to the recorded amounts and subsequent impairments,
if any. Nevertheless, management believes that the following
factors have contributed to the amount recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
Technological development capabilities and intellectual capital.
|
|
|
|
Expected significant growth in revenues and profits from the
expanding market in identity solutions.
|
|
|
|
Expected synergies resulting from providing multi modal product
offerings to existing customer base and to new customers of the
combined Company.
|
The recorded amounts at the purchase date for goodwill and other
intangible assets are estimates at a point in time and are based
on valuations and other analyses of fair value that require
significant estimates and assumptions about future events,
including but not limited to projections of revenues, market
growth, demand, technological developments, political
developments, government policies, among other factors, which
are derived from information obtained from independent sources,
as well as the management of the acquired businesses and
business plans for the acquired businesses or intellectual
property.
If estimates and assumptions used to initially record goodwill
and intangible assets do not materialize, or unanticipated
adverse developments or events occur, ongoing reviews of the
carrying amounts of such goodwill and intangible assets may
result in impairments which will require L-1 to record a charge
in the period in which such an impairment is identified, and
could have a severe negative impact on its business and
financial statements.
If the L-1 stock price were to decrease materially from current
levels and remain depressed for a sustained period of time, the
Company may be required to assess the carrying amount of
goodwill and long-lived assets of reporting units before the
next scheduled annual impairment test. If at that time the
estimated fair values of the reporting units are less than their
respective carrying amounts, L-1 would need to determine whether
goodwill and long-lived assets would be impaired. Moreover, if
economic conditions deteriorate and capital markets conditions
negatively impact the valuation of enterprises, the estimated
fair values of L-1 reporting units could be adversely impacted,
which could result in future impairments.
26
If L-1
does not achieve expected benefits from completed acquisitions,
the price of L-1 common stock could decline.
L-1 expects that its consummated acquisitions will enhance
leadership in the identity solutions industry through the
combination of respective technologies. However, the combination
of such technologies might not meet the demands of the customers.
If L-1 technologies fail to meet such demand, customer
acceptance of L-1 biometric products could decline, which would
have an adverse effect on results of operations and financial
conditions. Further, L-1 expects that the additions to solutions
offerings will extend current market reach and provide a
critical component to the Companys comprehensive offering
for new markets in need of identity solutions. However, there
can be no assurance that current customers or customers in new
markets will be receptive to these additional offerings.
Further, L-1 might not be able to market successfully its
products and services to the customers of the businesses
acquired. If L-1 solutions offerings and services fail to meet
the demands of customers, results of operations and financial
condition could be adversely affected.
There is also a risk that L-1 will not achieve the anticipated
benefits of the acquisitions as rapidly as, or to the extent,
anticipated by financial or industry analysts, or that such
analysts will not perceive the same benefits to the acquisitions
as does the Company. If these risks materialize, the L-1 stock
price could be adversely affected.
27
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
There are no unresolved staff comments.
L-1 does not own any properties. Significant leasing
arrangements are outlined below.
The Corporate headquarters comprises approximately
17,000 square feet of space in facilities located in
Stamford, Connecticut. L-1 subleases space from L-1 Investment
Partners LLC. The sublease terminates on the earlier of the date
that the Companys Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
ceases employment with the Company or March 2015. L-1 uses this
property for corporate, administrative and general business
needs.
Information about the Companys leased facilities related
to continuing operations follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expire
|
Location
|
|
Square Feet
|
|
Date
|
|
Billerica, Massachusetts
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
April 2016
|
|
Bloomington, Minnesota
|
|
|
59,000
|
|
|
|
October 2014
|
|
Fort Wayne, Indiana
|
|
|
48,000
|
|
|
|
January 2013
|
|
Martinez, California
|
|
|
26,000
|
|
|
|
May 2011
|
|
Nashville, Tennessee
|
|
|
21,000
|
|
|
|
December 2013
|
|
Sacramento, California
|
|
|
21,000
|
|
|
|
May 2015
|
|
Arlington, Virginia
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
December 2012
|
|
Jersey City, New Jersey
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
July 2017
|
|
Stamford, Connecticut
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
|
March 2015
|
|
Springfield, Illinois
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
December 2015
|
|
Markham, Canada
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
December 2015
|
|
Concord, California
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
|
|
November 30, 2018
|
|
Forest Park, Georgia
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
May 2014
|
|
Oakville, Canada
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
Monthly
|
|
Lacey, Washington
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
Monthly
|
|
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
September 2011
|
|
L-1 also leases sales and support offices in multiple locations
throughout the United States and internationally.
While the Company believes that these facilities are adequate to
meet immediate needs, it may become necessary to secure
additional space in the future to accommodate any future growth.
The Company believes that such additional space will be
available as needed in the future on commercially reasonable
terms.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
Putative
Shareholder Class Action Litigation
The Company was named as a defendant in five putative
shareholder class actions filed in the Superior Court of
Connecticut, Judicial District of Stamford-Norwalk at Stamford,
arising out of the transactions with Safran and BAE pursuant to
the Merger Agreement and BAE Purchase Agreement. The actions
were captioned: Michael Palma v. Robert LaPenta et
al., CV-10-6006781-S (Conn. Super. Ct.), Barry P.
Kranz, Jr. v. L-1 Identity Solutions et al.,
CV-10-6006760-S (Conn. Super. Ct.), Michael Matteo v.
L-1 Identity Solutions et al., CV-10-6006759-S (Conn. Super.
Ct.), Dart Seasonal Products Retirement Plan v. L-1
Identity Solutions et al., CV-10-6006835-S (Conn. Super.
Ct.), and George F. Chrisman v. Robert LaPenta et al.,
CV-10-6006886-S (Conn. Super. Ct.) (collectively, the
Shareholder Actions).
The plaintiffs in the Shareholder Actions generally alleged the
members of the L-1 Board of Directors and certain officers of
the Company breached their fiduciary duties to shareholders by,
among other things, allegedly
28
failing to receive maximum value for their shares, failing to
conduct an appropriate sale process and agreeing to certain
terms in the proposed merger agreement with Safran that
allegedly discourage competing offers from other potential
bidders
and/or
benefit defendants. The Shareholder Actions generally alleged
that the Company aided and abetted these alleged breaches of
fiduciary duty. Certain of the suits also alleged claims against
Safran, Merger Sub, BAE and BAE Systems, Inc. (the parent entity
to BAE and the U.S. affiliate of BAE Systems plc) for
aiding and abetting the foregoing alleged breaches of fiduciary
duty. The Shareholder Actions generally sought preliminary and
permanent relief, including, among other things, permission to
proceed as a class action, declaratory relief declaring that
defendants have breached their fiduciary duties, an injunction
enjoining the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement
and BAE Purchase Agreement, rescissionary damages in the event
that the Transactions are consummated, costs and attorneys
and experts fees.
On December 1, 2010, the plaintiffs reported that they had
agreed on a lead counsel and lead plaintiff structure whereby
the Matteo, Kranz & Dart Seasonal Products Retirement
Plan plaintiffs became co-lead plaintiffs and their counsel
co-lead counsel. On December 3, 2010, the Court entered an
order consolidating the actions and appointing a leadership
structure consisting of Kranz and Dart Seasonal Products
Retirement Plan as Lead Plaintiffs, the law firms of Robbins
Umeda LLP and Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP as
Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs, and the law firms of Wofsey
Rosen Kweskin Kuriansky, LLP and Diserio Martin
OConnor & Castiglioni LLP as Co-Liaison Counsel
for Plaintiffs. The caption for the consolidated cases is: In
re L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc. Shareholder Litigation, Lead
Case
No. X05-FST-CVIO-6006759-S.
On December 6, 2010, Lead Plaintiffs filed a Motion for
Limited Expedited Discovery and for a Briefing and Hearing
Schedule on Plaintiffs Anticipated Motion for Equitable
Relief and Objection to Defendants Request for Extension
of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs Discovery Requests in the
Court. On December 10 and 13, 2010, the Company and the other
defendants (except the BAE defendants who had already filed
motions to strike and to stay), respectively, filed motions to
strike the Complaint and motions to stay discovery pending
adjudication of the motions to strike and objections to Lead
Plaintiffs motion to expedite discovery.
On December 15, 2010, after arms length negotiations,
the parties entered into a memorandum of understanding
(MOU) to settle the litigation, which will be
memorialized in a final settlement agreement to be submitted to
the Court for approval. Pursuant to the MOU, the Company agreed
to make certain additional disclosures in the Final Proxy.
Additionally, pursuant to the MOU, the plaintiffs will be
afforded the opportunity to conduct confirmatory discovery
sufficient to confirm the fairness and reasonableness of the
terms of the final settlement agreement.
The Company continues to vigorously deny any and all liability
with respect to the facts and claims alleged in the action.
Old
Digimarc Litigation
In connection with the Companys August 2008 acquisition of
Old Digimarc, which consisted of its Secure ID Business
following the spin-off of its digital watermarking business, the
Company assumed certain legal proceedings of Old Digimarc as
described below.
Beginning in May 2001, a number of substantially identical class
action complaints alleging violations of the federal securities
laws were filed in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York naming approximately
300 companies, including Old Digimarc, certain officers and
directors and certain underwriters of the companies
initial public offerings as defendants. The complaints were
subsequently consolidated into a single action, and a
consolidated amended complaint was filed in April 2002. The
amended complaint alleges, among other things, that the
underwriters of Old Digimarcs initial public offering
violated securities laws by failing to disclose certain alleged
compensation arrangements in Old Digimarcs initial public
offering registration statement and by engaging in manipulative
practices to artificially inflate the price of Old
Digimarcs stock in the aftermarket subsequent to the
initial public offering. Old Digimarc and certain of its
officers and directors are named in the amended complaint
pursuant to Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 10(b) and
Rule 10b-5
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on the basis of an
alleged failure to disclose the underwriters alleged
compensation arrangements and manipulative practices. The
complaint sought unspecified damages. In July 2002, the claims
against Old Digimarc under Section 10(b) were dismissed. In
October 2002, the individual officer and
29
director defendants were dismissed without prejudice pursuant to
tolling agreements. Subsequent addenda to these tolling
agreements extended the tolling period through August 27,
2010. In June 2004, a stipulation of partial settlement among
the plaintiffs, the companies, and the officers and directors
was submitted to the District Court. While the partial
settlement was pending approval, the plaintiffs continued to
litigate their claims against the underwriter defendants. The
district court directed that the litigation proceed within a
number of focus cases rather than in all of the 309
cases that had been consolidated. Old Digimarc was not one of
these focus cases. In October 2004, the district court certified
the focus cases as class actions. The underwriter defendants
appealed that ruling and, on December 5, 2006, the Court of
Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the district
courts class certification decision for the six focus
cases. In light of the Second Circuit opinion, in June 2007, the
district court entered an order terminating the settlement. On
August 14, 2007, the plaintiffs filed their second
consolidated amended class action complaints against the focus
cases and on September 27, 2007, again moved for class
certification. On November 12, 2007, certain of the
defendants in the focus cases moved to dismiss the second
consolidated amended class action complaints. The court issued
an opinion and order on March 26, 2008, denying the motions
to dismiss except as to Section 11 claims raised by those
plaintiffs who sold their securities for a price in excess of
the initial offering price and those who purchased outside the
previously certified class period. The class certification
motion was withdrawn without prejudice on October 10, 2008.
On April 2, 2009, a stipulation and agreement of settlement
among the plaintiffs, issuer defendants (including Old Digimarc)
and underwriter defendants was submitted to the Court for
preliminary approval. Old Digimarcs portion of the
settlement, which is wholly immaterial, is covered entirely by
insurance.
On June 10, 2009, the Judge granted preliminary approval of
the settlement, and on October 5, 2009, the Judge granted
final approval of the settlement. On August 26, 2010, based
on the expiration of the tolling period stated in the tolling
agreements with the individual officers and directors, the
plaintiffs filed a Notice of Termination of Tolling Agreement
and Recommencement of Litigation against the named officers and
directors. The plaintiffs stated to the Court that they do not
intend to take any further action against the named officers and
directors at this time. Notices of appeal of the opinion
granting final approval were filed by six groups of appellants.
In October 2010, four of the groups of appellants withdrew their
appeals with prejudice. Plaintiffs have moved to dismiss with
prejudice one of the remaining appeals based on alleged
violations of the Second Circuits rules, including failure
to serve, falsifying proofs of service, and failure to include
citations to the record, and moved to dismiss the other appeal
based on alleged lack of standing. It is unclear when the Second
Circuit will rule on these motions.
On October 10, 2007, an Old Digimarc shareholder filed a
lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Western
District of Washington against several companies that acted as
lead underwriters for the Old Digimarc initial public offering.
The complaint, which also named Old Digimarc as a nominal
defendant but did not assert any claims against Old Digimarc,
asserted claims against the underwriters under
Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On
February 28, 2008, an amended complaint was filed, with Old
Digimarc still named only as a nominal defendant. Similar
complaints have been filed by this same plaintiff against a
number of other issuers in connection with their initial public
offerings, and the factual allegations are closely related to
the allegations in the litigation pending in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York which is
described above.
On March 12, 2009, after considering motions to dismiss,
one filed by thirty moving issuers and the other filed by the
underwriters, the judge dismissed the plaintiffs claims on
a jurisdictional and statute of limitations basis. On
April 10, 2009, the plaintiff filed a notice of appeal of
the dismissal. The final appellate brief was filed on
November 17, 2009; and oral argument was heard by the Ninth
Circuit Court of Appeals on October 5, 2010.
On December 2, 2010, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
affirmed the District Courts decision to dismiss the
moving issuers cases (including the Companys) on the
grounds that plaintiffs demand letters were insufficient
to put the issuers on notice of the claims asserted against them
and further ordered that the dismissals be made with prejudice.
The Ninth Circuit, however, reversed and remanded the District
Courts decision on the underwriter motion to dismiss
as to the claims arising from the non-moving issuers IPOs,
finding plaintiffs claims were not time-barred under the
applicable statute of limitations. In remanding, the
30
Ninth Circuit advised the non-moving issuers and underwriters to
file in the District Court the same challenges to
plaintiffs demand letters that moving issuers had filed.
On December 16, 2010, underwriters filed a petition for
panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc. Appellant
Vanessa Simmonds also filed a petition for rehearing en banc. On
January 18, 2011, the Ninth Circuit denied the petition for
rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc. It further
ordered that no further petitions for rehearing may be filed.
On January 24, 2011, the underwriters filed a motion to
stay the issuance of the Ninth Circuits mandate in the
cases involving the non-moving issuers. On January 25,
2011, the Ninth Circuit granted the underwriters motion
and ordered that the mandate in the cases involving the
non-moving issuers is stayed for ninety days pending the filing
of a petition for writ of certiorari in the United States
Supreme Court. On January 26, 2011, Appellant Vanessa
Simmonds moved to join the underwriters motion and
requested the Ninth Circuit stay the mandate in all cases. On
January 26, 2011, the Ninth Circuit granted
Appellants motion and ruled that the mandate in all cases
(including the Companys and other moving issuers) is
stayed for ninety days pending Appellants filing of a
petition for writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme
Court. The Company currently believes that the outcome of this
litigation will not have a material adverse impact on its
condensed consolidated financial position and results of
operations.
Patent
Litigation
On May 12, 2010, the Company was served with a complaint in
the U.S. District Court, District of Delaware, alleging
patent infringement of US Patent No. 5,913,542 regarding
the making, using, offering for sale and selling of ID cards,
including drivers licenses. On August 19, 2010, the
Company filed an amended answer to the complaint, which
contained counterclaims for declaratory judgment against the
plaintiff. The Court has set a trial date of June 11, 2012.
Based on the preliminary nature of the proceedings, it is not
possible at this stage to quantify the potential damages,
exposure or liability to L-1, if any.
Other
The Company records a liability for any claim, demand,
litigation and other contingency when management believes that
it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and can
reasonably estimate the amount of the potential loss. Based on
current information and belief, the Company believes it has
adequate provisions for any such matters. The Company reviews
these provisions quarterly and adjusts these provisions to
reflect the impact of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice
of legal counsel and other information and events pertaining to
a particular matter. However, because of the inherent
uncertainties of litigation the ultimate outcome of certain
litigation cannot be accurately predicted by the Company; it is
therefore possible that the consolidated financial position,
results of operations or cash flows of the Company could be
materially adversely affected in any particular period by the
unfavorable resolution of one or more of these matters and
contingencies.
Item 4.
[Removed and Reserved]
31
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
Market
for L-1 Common Stock
L-1 common
stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
ID. As of February 24, 2011, there were 828 holders
of record of L-1 common stock.
The quarterly high and low sales prices, as reported by the New
York Stock Exchange or NASDAQ, as applicable, of L-1 common
stock during 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Quarter
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
9.46
|
|
|
$
|
6.97
|
|
|
$
|
8.16
|
|
|
$
|
3.23
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
9.06
|
|
|
$
|
6.78
|
|
|
$
|
9.50
|
|
|
$
|
4.93
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
11.75
|
|
|
$
|
7.11
|
|
|
$
|
8.64
|
|
|
$
|
6.74
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
11.95
|
|
|
$
|
11.73
|
|
|
$
|
7.90
|
|
|
$
|
5.67
|
|
Dividend
Policy
L-1 paid no
dividends in 2010 or 2009.
L-1
presently intends to retain its cash for use in the operation
and expansion of business and, therefore, does not anticipate
paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. In
addition, L-1 is prohibited from paying dividends pursuant to
its credit agreement with Bank of America, N.A.
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
Repurchases
of Common Stock
There were no significant shares repurchased of common stock
during 2010 and 2009. On January 26, 2011, JP Morgan Chase
delivered 3,490,400 shares of common stock pursuant to the
prepaid forward contract. The shares are being held in treasury.
Equity
Compensation Plan
Information(1)
Information about our equity compensation plans as of
December 31, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining available
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for future issuance
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
under equity
|
|
|
to be issued upon
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
compensation plans
|
|
|
exercise of
|
|
exercise price of
|
|
(excluding
|
|
|
outstanding
|
|
outstanding
|
|
securities
|
|
|
options, warrants
|
|
options, warrants
|
|
reflected in
|
|
|
and rights
|
|
and rights
|
|
column (a))
|
Plan Category
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
3,485,703
|
|
|
$
|
12.4512
|
|
|
|
1,300,016
|
(2)
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security
holders(3)
|
|
|
2,144,455
|
|
|
$
|
16.0043
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,630,158
|
|
|
$
|
13.8045
|
|
|
|
1,300,016
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The following plans were assumed by the Company in connection
with acquisitions: Bioscrypt Inc. Primary Stock Option Plan;
Bioscrypt Inc. A4Vision Plan; Identix Incorporated 1995 Equity
Incentive Plan; |
32
|
|
|
|
|
Identix Incorporated 2000 New Employee Stock Incentive Plan;
Identix Incorporated Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan;
Imaging Automation, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan; Imaging
Automation, Inc. 2003 Employee, Director And Consultant Stock
Plan; Visionics Corporation 1990 Stock Option Plan; Visionics
Corporation 1998 Stock Option Plan; and Visionics Corporation
Stock Incentive Plan. As of December 31, 2010,
1,498,980 shares of Company common stock were issuable upon
the exercise of outstanding stock options under these plans at a
weighted average price of $11.3254. No subsequent grants will be
made under these plans. Information regarding options
outstanding under acquired Company plans is not included in the
above table. |
|
(2) |
|
Under the L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc. Amended and Restated 2006
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 1,300,216 shares remain
available for purchase under the plan and no shares are subject
to purchase during the current purchase period. |
|
(3) |
|
In February 2002, the board of Identix adopted the Identix
Incorporated 2002 Equity Incentive Plan (the Identix
Plan) and in June 2002 the shareholders of Identix
approved the Identix Plan. The Identix Plan authorized
employees, directors and consultants to receive up to
5,800,000 shares of common stock. In August 2006, Viisage
merged with Identix and the Identix Plan was assumed pursuant to
the terms of the merger. Following the merger, employees,
directors and consultants of Identix were eligible to receive
additional grants under the Identix Plan and outstanding awards
under the Identix Plan continued to be exercisable upon the same
terms and conditions (after giving effect to any acceleration of
vesting resulting from the merger); provided, however, that
(i) each such option thereafter was exercisable for a
number of shares of the Companys common stock (rounded
down to the nearest whole share) equal to the product obtained
from multiplying the number of shares of common stock of Identix
subject to such option by 0.473, and (ii) the exercise
price per share of the Companys common stock was to equal
the quotient obtained from dividing the exercise price per share
of common stock of Identix subject to such option in effect
immediately prior to the merger by 0.473 (rounded up to the
nearest whole cent). |
33
Stock
Performance Chart
The following performance chart assumes an investment of $100 on
December 31, 2005 and compares the change through
December 31, 2010 in the market price for L-1 common stock
with the Russell 2000 Index, the NASDAQ Composite Index, and a
peer group identified by the Company (the Selected Peer
Group Index). The Selected Comparative Group Index was
selected to include publicly-traded companies engaging in one or
more of the Companys lines of business.
The Selected Comparative Group Index is weighted according to
the respective issuers stock market capitalization and is
comprised of the following companies: CACI International, Inc.,
LaserCard Corporation, Bio-Key International and ImageWare
Systems, Inc. The selected group data have been changed from
that provided in prior periods to eliminate Cogent, Inc, and
ActivIdentity Corporation which are no longer public companies.
The comparisons in the graphs below are based on historical data
and are not intended to forecast the possible future performance
of L-1s common stock.
Stock
Performance Chart
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
The financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction
with Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and
L-1s audited consolidated financial statements as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2010 included in this
annual report on
Form 10-K,
from which the data have been derived for the dates and periods
indicated. The financial data set forth below has been revised
to retroactively reflect the Companys Intel Business as
discontinued operations. The balance sheet data for all dates
have been derived from the audited financial statements for the
respective years. The income statement data for 2006 have been
derived from
34
unaudited statement of operations reflecting the Intel Business
as discontinued operations. The historical results of operations
are not necessarily indicative of future results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010(3)
|
|
|
2009(2)(3)
|
|
|
2008(1)(2)(3)
|
|
|
2007(1)(2)(3)
|
|
|
2006(2)(3)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
450,128
|
|
|
$
|
437,129
|
|
|
$
|
358,139
|
|
|
$
|
272,533
|
|
|
$
|
151,285
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
329,705
|
|
|
|
309,583
|
|
|
|
251,099
|
|
|
|
188,444
|
|
|
|
105,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
120,423
|
|
|
|
127,546
|
|
|
|
107,040
|
|
|
|
84,089
|
|
|
|
46,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
37,193
|
|
|
|
38,651
|
|
|
|
36,425
|
|
|
|
27,719
|
|
|
|
14,430
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
22,309
|
|
|
|
20,730
|
|
|
|
25,244
|
|
|
|
18,482
|
|
|
|
11,589
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
59,567
|
|
|
|
54,953
|
|
|
|
49,185
|
|
|
|
39,667
|
|
|
|
28,358
|
|
Asset impairments and acquisition related expenses
|
|
|
3,150
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
529,683
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
22,767
|
|
Strategic alternative transactions costs and other
|
|
|
11,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
1,266
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
133,289
|
|
|
|
114,996
|
|
|
|
641,437
|
|
|
|
92,134
|
|
|
|
77,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(12,866
|
)
|
|
|
12,550
|
|
|
|
(534,397
|
)
|
|
|
(8,045
|
)
|
|
|
(31,215
|
)
|
Financing costs
|
|
|
(17,025
|
)
|
|
|
(14,666
|
)
|
|
|
(13,281
|
)
|
|
|
(7,926
|
)
|
|
|
(310
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
(324
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
1,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes and discontinued operations
|
|
|
(30,229
|
)
|
|
|
(2,440
|
)
|
|
|
(547,666
|
)
|
|
|
(16,114
|
)
|
|
|
(29,879
|
)
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
|
|
|
20,215
|
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
|
|
(7,643
|
)
|
|
|
27,758
|
|
|
|
(2,177
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(10,014
|
)
|
|
|
(1,115
|
)
|
|
|
(555,309
|
)
|
|
|
11,644
|
|
|
|
(32,056
|
)
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income
taxes
|
|
|
(6,451
|
)
|
|
|
(2,888
|
)
|
|
|
3,715
|
|
|
|
4,163
|
|
|
|
1,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(16,465
|
)
|
|
|
(4,003
|
)
|
|
|
(551,594
|
)
|
|
|
15,807
|
|
|
|
(31,037
|
)
|
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(195
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to
L-1 shareholders
|
|
$
|
(16,486
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,198
|
)
|
|
$
|
(551,594
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,807
|
|
|
$
|
(31,037
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis and diluted net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7.16
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
(0.73
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to L-1 shareholders
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
(0.71
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
87,756
|
|
|
|
85,516
|
|
|
|
77,518
|
|
|
|
71,663
|
|
|
|
43,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
87,756
|
|
|
|
85,516
|
|
|
|
77,518
|
|
|
|
72,385
|
|
|
|
43,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets, net of current liabilities
|
|
$
|
27,401
|
|
|
$
|
9,403
|
|
|
$
|
24,371
|
|
|
$
|
40,869
|
|
|
$
|
11,658
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,392,856
|
|
|
|
1,323,825
|
|
|
|
1,309,821
|
|
|
|
1,435,595
|
|
|
|
1,227,225
|
|
Long-term debt, including current maturities
|
|
|
483,463
|
|
|
|
446,366
|
|
|
|
448,491
|
|
|
|
234,918
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
740,331
|
|
|
|
730,461
|
|
|
|
708,480
|
|
|
|
1,098,749
|
|
|
|
1,067,085
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements. |
35
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The results of each of the years presented have been materially
impacted by acquisitions, including the Intel Business initially
included in the results of operations in 2006. See Note 13 to
the consolidated financial statements. |
|
(3) |
|
Beginning in 2007, the results of operations reflects the
retrospective adoption of guidance related to the accounting for
convertible debt instruments and guidance related to the
expensing of acquisition related costs. See Note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements. Beginning in 2006 the results
of operations also reflects the retroactive presentation of the
Intel Business as discontinued operations. See Note 15 to
the consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
The following discussion and analysis should be read in
conjunction with L-1s consolidated financial statements
and the accompanying notes thereto provided pursuant to
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data contained within this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Overview
L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc. (L-1 or the
Company) is a provider of technology, products,
systems and solutions, and services that protect and secure
personal identities and assets. Together with its divisions, L-1
delivers the full range of offerings required for solving
complex problems associated with managing identity. Depending
upon customer needs, identity solutions can be bundled with
services offerings to create an integrated solution.
The business is evaluated primarily through financial metrics
including revenues, operating income (loss) and Adjusted EBITDA
(earnings before, interest expense, net, depreciation and
amortization, stock- based compensation expense, asset
impairments and provision (benefit) for income taxes), and
unlevered free cash flow.
The Company operates in two reportable segments: Solutions and
Services.
The Solutions segment includes Secure Credentialing and
Biometrics/Enterprise Access. Secure Credentialing solutions
span the entire secure credentialing lifecycle, from testing
through issuance and inspection. This includes drivers
licenses, national IDs, ePassports and other forms of
government-issued proof of identity credentials. Biometric
solutions capture, manage and move biometric data for positive,
rapid ID and tracking of persons of interest. Biometrics
solutions also encompass access control readers that enable
businesses and governments to secure facilities and restricted
areas by preventing unauthorized entry.
Prior to September 19, 2010, the Services segment included
Enrollment Services, SpecTal/McClendon and Advanced Concepts.
Enrollment Services performs fingerprint-based background checks
necessary for federal and state licensed employment in the
banking, finance, insurance, healthcare, legal, real estate,
education and other industries. SpecTal/McClendon and Advanced
Concepts provide services to the national security and
intelligence community, including information technology,
engineering and analytics, and intelligence. As a result of
accounting for SpecTal/McClendon and Advanced Concepts as
discontinued operations, subsequent to September 19, 2010,
the Services segment consists of the Enrollment Services
operating segment and all prior period segment data have been
revised accordingly.
Recent
Transactions
In January 2010, L-1 announced that one of its strategic goals
and objectives for 2010 was to explore strategic alternatives to
enhance shareholder value. Subsequently, on September 19,
2010, the Company entered into an agreement (the Merger
Agreement) with Safran SA (Safran) and Laser
Acquisition Sub Inc. (Merger Sub), a wholly owned
subsidiary of Safran, pursuant to which, subject to the terms
and conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, the Company is
to be acquired by Safran in a merger transaction providing for
shareholders to receive $12.00 per share in cash, for an
aggregate enterprise value of approximately $1.6 billion,
inclusive of outstanding debt. Completion of the merger remains
subject to certain conditions, including, among others,
(i) termination or expiration of the Committee on Foreign
Investment in
36
the United States (CFIUS) review period pursuant to
the Exon-Florio Provision of the Defense Production Act of 1950;
(ii) no Company Material Adverse Effect (as defined in the
Merger Agreement) having occurred since the date of the Merger
Agreement; (iii) subject to certain materiality exceptions,
the accuracy of the representations and warranties made by the
Company and Safran and compliance by the Company and Safran with
their respective obligations under the Merger Agreement;
(iv) no law or government order prohibiting the merger; and
(v) other customary conditions.
In February 2011, the Company completed its previously announced
sale of the Intel Business to BAE Systems Information Solutions,
Inc. (BAE) (a subsidiary of BAE Systems, Inc., the
U.S. affiliate of BAE Systems plc). Pursuant to the terms
of the Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 19, 2010
(the BAE Purchase Agreement), by and between the
Company and BAE, the Company sold the Intel Business to BAE for
a purchase price of $295.8 million in cash (inclusive of
acquired cash) and approximately $7.2 million in assumed
obligations, the net proceeds of which were used to repay
$289.3 million of outstanding debt under the Companys
credit agreement.
The accompanying financial data reflect the impact of the sale
of the Intel Business, whose operating results have been
reflected as discontinued operations for all periods presented,
and the related assets have been presented as assets held for
sale and liabilities related to assets held for sale as of
December 31, 2010. However, the consolidated financial
statements do not reflect the pro forma effect of the sale of
the Intel Business or the repayment of the long-term debt in
accordance with the terms of the Credit Agreement. Unless
otherwise noted, revenues and expenses presented herein exclude
amounts attributable to discontinued operations. See
Notes 1 and 15 to the consolidated financial statements for
additional information.
Business
Trends
In the last two years management considered the following
factors, among others in evaluating its financial condition and
operating results:
|
|
|
|
|
Our Biometrics operating segment, while having growth
opportunities, may be subject to the lengthy sales cycles
involved in large government procurements domestically and
internationally. For example, during 2009 and 2010 the Company
experienced a delay regarding the sale of an increased capacity
license relating to a sole source program. In recent months, the
division has expanded its marketing and proposal efforts outside
the United States and recorded revenues from the sale of
products related to the India UID program.
|
|
|
|
Our Secure Credentialing operating segment has been successful
in winning large competitive credentialing contracts and
continues to have opportunities in assisting US DMVs with cost
effective and efficient programs. International new awards can
be subject to lengthy sales cycles and delays, as recently has
been the case in connection with certain programs in Africa and
South America.
|
|
|
|
We have been awarded 22 out of 27 competitive driver license
contracts and contract extensions since January 1, 2010
which will result in revenue increases over the term of the
contracts once the systems are implemented. These secure
solutions require up front capital expenditures before such
revenue increases are realized. Capital expenditures, which are
primarily related to the secure credentialing business,
aggregated approximately $45.0 million in 2010 and are
expected to approximate $40.0 million in 2011. We expect
that there will be a decline in capital expenditures in 2012 as
the majority of our recently awarded drivers license
contracts will be implemented.
|
|
|
|
Our existing credit agreement which was executed in August 2008
in the midst of the severe global economic crisis contains
certain restrictions, principal repayment schedules and
financial covenants that are significantly more restrictive than
those prevailing in the current lending environment. In 2009 and
2010, we amended the credit agreement to reduce the principal
payments on a permanent basis, and recently modified certain
financial covenants to provide for significant operating
flexibility as we continue to operate the businesses pending
completion of the sale transaction with Safran. In 2011, in
connection with the consummation of the BAE transaction, we
repaid approximately $289.3 million of our debt, improving
our liquidity and our ability to meet our debt covenants.
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
While we have grown significantly though acquisitions, we have
not consummated any material acquisitions since the August 2008
acquisition of the secure ID systems business of Digimarc, as we
have focused on growing the existing business to improve our
liquidity and completing our strategic alternative process.
|
The results of operations of the Company have been impacted by
the considerations described above. Additional specific events
that directly impacted the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows are discussed in the Consolidated
Results of Operations and Liquidity and Capital Resources
sections.
Revenues from continuing operations, increased to
$450.1 million for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2010, from $437.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009. L-1s net loss from
continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2010
was $10.0 million, compared $1.1 million loss for the
year ended December 31, 2009. The net loss from continuing
operations in 2010 includes a pre-tax impairment charge of
$3.2 million primarily related to Registered Traveler
program and pre-tax charges of $11.1 million of costs
related to the strategic alternative process that resulted in
executing definitive agreements to sell the Company. The 2009
loss includes a pre-tax provision of $1.2 million related
to the suspension of the Registered Traveler program.
The net loss from discontinued operations for the year ended
December 31, 2010 was $6.5 million, compared to a
corresponding net loss of $2.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009 and includes $4.7 million of
strategic alternative costs. In the first quarter of 2011, the
Company will recognize a pre-tax gain on the sale of the Intel
Business to BAE of approximately $40.0 million.
Revenues
The Secure Credentialing business generates revenues from the
sales of solutions consisting of bundled proprietary software
with commercial
off-the-shelf
equipment and related maintenance and services, the sale of
secure printing solutions and related consumables, and the
design, customization and installation of secure credential
issuance systems which generate revenues as the credentials are
issued by the customer. The division also generates revenues
from sales of solutions using biometric technologies of other
divisions.
The Biometrics/Enterprise Access business generates revenues
from the sale of biometric solutions incorporating fingerprint,
facial, and iris biometrics and system components necessary for
the biometric capture and knowledge discovery and the sale of
biometrics solutions using proprietary multi-biometric capture
devices bundled together with proprietary software and other
biometric technologies, as well as sales of licenses and
software. The divisions offerings include Live Scan and
mobile systems and services for biometric capture and
identification, systems and biometric solutions that include
modules and software for biometric matching and verification,
and related maintenance services. Revenues are generated by
sales of hardware, software and maintenance and other services.
In addition, the division provides solutions that include
biometrics-based readers used to secure buildings and restricted
areas.
The Enrollment Services business generates revenues through the
sales of enrollment and background screening products and
fingerprinting services principally under long term service
contracts.
Government Consulting Services (now reported as discontinued
operations) consists of the businesses of Advanced Concepts
Inc., McClendon LLC, SpecTal, LLC, and generates revenue by
providing consulting and information technology services to
U.S. intelligence and military communities, principally
under long term Federal contracts and subcontracts.
L-1 markets its solutions and services primarily to
U.S. and foreign, Federal, State and Local government
agencies and law enforcement agencies. L-1 also is working to
expand the use of its solutions in commercial markets,
particularly financial services, transportation and healthcare.
In a typical contract with a government entity for an identity
solution, L-1 designs the system, supplies and installs
equipment and software and integrates the solution within the
entitys existing infrastructure and provides maintenance
services. These contracts may be structured as fixed price
contracts with payments made upon completion of agreed
milestones or deliveries and with each milestone or delivery
typically having a value specified in the contract.
Alternatively, these contracts may provide for a fixed price per
credential issued as is typical in the drivers
38
license market. For services contracts, L-1 is compensated at a
rate per fingerprint delivered in the case of fingerprinting
services, or on a time and material, fixed price level of effort
and cost reimbursable basis for Government Consulting Services
contracts.
L-1s aggregate revenues from continuing and discontinued
operations have grown to $668.5 million in 2010 from
$66.2 million in 2005. L-1 growth in revenues is due
principally to acquisitions consummated, increased demand for
identity solutions related to heightened emphasis on security,
secure credentials, document authentication and biometrics, as
well as increased demand for government security services. L-1
anticipates that the U.S. government agencies will continue
to be major customers for the foreseeable future. L-1 also
expects to experience increased demand from a number of other
government entities as they deploy identity solutions,
particularly document authentication, at points of entry and
exit, including borders, seaports and airports and in connection
with national identification programs. Notwithstanding
expectations regarding demand for these solutions, the quantity
and timing of orders from both U.S. and foreign government
entities depends on a number of factors outside of the
Companys control, such as the level and timing of budget
appropriations. Any funding delays or other changes in the
rollout of government programs utilizing L-1 solutions, products
and services could cause revenues to fall short of expectations.
Acquisitions
L-1 has pursued strategic acquisitions to complement and expand
its existing solutions and services. Acquisitions since
January 1, 2008 include:
|
|
|
|
|
February 2010 acquisition of certain assets of Retica Systems.
|
|
|
|
August 2008 acquisition of Old Digimarc, which provides secure
credentialing systems to State and Local government agencies.
|
|
|
|
March 2008 acquisition of Bioscrypt, which provides enterprise
access products and solutions to government agencies and
commercial entities.
|
The acquisitions have resulted in the consolidation of certain
marketing resources, corporate functions of the separate
entities and are expected to have a continuing material effect
on operations resulting from, but not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
Synergies resulting from providing a comprehensive product line
to current and future customers.
|
|
|
|
Growth in revenues and profits from expanded markets for
identity solutions.
|
|
|
|
Enhancement of technical capabilities resulting from combining
the intellectual capital of the acquired businesses.
|
|
|
|
Rationalization of technology costs and research and development
activities.
|
|
|
|
Realignment of the businesses to complement each business
unique capabilities and rationalizing costs.
|
|
|
|
Leveraging the Companys infrastructure to achieve higher
revenues and profitability.
|
Reportable
Segments Results of Operations
L-1 operates
in two reportable segments, the Solutions segment and the
Services segment. Prior to September 19, 2010 the Services
reportable segment consisted of the SpecTal/McClendon, Advanced
Concepts and the Enrollment Services operating segments. As a
result of presenting the SpecTal/McClendon and Advanced Concepts
operating segments as discontinued operations, the Services
reportable segment now consists of the Enrollment Services
operating segment; accordingly, the segment data has been
retroactively revised. L-1 measures segment performance
primarily based on revenues, operating income (loss) and
Adjusted
39
EBITDA and unlevered free cash flow. Operating results by
segment for continuing operations, including allocation of
corporate expenses, for the three years ended December 31,
2010 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Solutions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
331,989
|
|
|
$
|
322,512
|
|
|
$
|
280,045
|
|
Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
(8,629
|
)
|
|
|
12,509
|
|
|
|
(534,779
|
)
|
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
|
|
|
34,484
|
|
|
|
29,593
|
|
|
|
41,051
|
|
Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
118,139
|
|
|
|
114,617
|
|
|
|
78,094
|
|
Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
(4,237
|
)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
|
|
|
4,009
|
|
|
|
2,927
|
|
|
|
2,751
|
|
Consolidated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
450,128
|
|
|
|
437,129
|
|
|
|
358,139
|
|
Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
(12,866
|
)
|
|
|
12,550
|
|
|
|
(534,397
|
)
|
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
|
|
|
38,493
|
|
|
|
32,520
|
|
|
|
43,802
|
|
In 2010 and 2009, the Solutions reportable segment includes a
provision of $3.1 million and $1.2 million,
respectively, primarily related to the suspension of the
Registered Traveler program. In 2008, the Solutions and Services
reportable segments include goodwill and long-lived asset
impairments of $527.2 million and $1.4 million,
respectively, and the Solutions segment includes merger related
severance costs of $1.1 million. In 2010, the Solutions and
Services segments includes allocated strategic alternative costs
of $9.7 million and $1.4 million, respectively.
Excluding the above charges, the operating income (loss) for
Solutions was $4.2 million in 2010, $13.7 million in
2009 and ($6.5) million in 2008 and operating income (loss)
for Services was ($2.8) million in 2010 and
$1.8 million in 2008. The 2010 period also reflects higher
depreciation as a result of new credentialing systems coming on
line. The 2008 period also reflects higher intangible
amortization of intangible assets.
Revenue increases for the Solutions segment are primarily
attributable to the acquisition of Digimarc in August 2008 and
Bioscrypt in March 2008 as well as organic growth in the
business as discussed below. Revenue increases for the Services
segment reflects growth from higher volumes and new contracts.
Dependence
on Significant Customers
For the year ended December 31, 2010, U.S. Federal
government agencies, directly or indirectly, accounted for
36 percent of consolidated revenues from continuing
operations. For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
U.S. Federal Government agencies, directly or indirectly
accounted for 39 percent and 44 percent of
consolidated revenues from continuing operations, respectively.
Accounts receivable from U.S. government agencies amounted
to $8.6 million and $13.9 million at December 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively.
40
Discontinued
Operations
Effective September 19, 2010, the Intel Business has been
presented as discontinued operations. All prior period data have
been revised accordingly. The following table summarizes
operating data related to discontinued operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
218,402
|
|
|
$
|
213,808
|
|
|
$
|
204,733
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
(154,432
|
)
|
|
|
(149,736
|
)
|
|
|
(143,770
|
)
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
(49,049
|
)
|
|
|
(41,488
|
)
|
|
|
(40,334
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
14,921
|
|
|
|
22,584
|
|
|
|
20,629
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(23,715
|
)
|
|
|
(26,655
|
)
|
|
|
(14,613
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
721
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(8,073
|
)
|
|
|
(4,021
|
)
|
|
|
6,032
|
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
|
|
|
1,622
|
|
|
|
1,133
|
|
|
|
(2,317
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
(6,451
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,888
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from discontinued operations increased by
$4.6 million in 2010 and $9.1 million in 2009 which
reflects the impact of competitive pressures and the goal of
certain agencies in the intelligence community to reduce
reliance on subcontractors. The 2010 results include
$4.7 million of strategic alternative costs. Operating
margins before strategic alternative costs were 9.0 percent
(6.8 percent after strategic alternative costs),
10.6 percent and 10.1 percent for 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Interest expense represents allocated costs incurred in
connection with the debt required to be repaid from the proceeds
from the sale of the discontinued operations.
Continuing
Operations
Consolidated
Results
Comparative results of operations have been affected by the
March 2008 acquisition of Bioscrypt and the August 2008
acquisition of Old Digimarc (collectively the
Acquisitions).
In addition to the impact of the Acquisitions, the following
items impacted operating results, net of related tax effects, if
applicable (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(430.0
|
)
|
Impairment of long-lived assets
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61.3
|
)
|
(Addition) reduction of tax valuation allowance
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
(48.0
|
)
|
Strategic alternative and merger related costs
|
|
|
(8.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
Costs and provision related to suspended Registered Traveler
program
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(540.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specific information regarding the impact of the Acquisitions on
the results of operations is provided below.
41
Comparison
of 2010 to 2009
Revenues
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Services
|
|
$
|
117,810
|
|
|
$
|
113,445
|
|
Solutions
|
|
|
332,318
|
|
|
|
323,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
450,128
|
|
|
$
|
437,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
and Services Revenues
The following represents details of the products and services
revenues for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Federal government services
|
|
$
|
25,673
|
|
|
$
|
35,737
|
|
State and local government services
|
|
|
92,137
|
|
|
|
77,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Services
|
|
|
117,810
|
|
|
|
113,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solutions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and local government solutions
|
|
|
122,165
|
|
|
|
117,547
|
|
Hardware and consumables
|
|
|
96,255
|
|
|
|
116,305
|
|
Software licensing fees and other
|
|
|
76,279
|
|
|
|
56,047
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
37,619
|
|
|
|
33,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Solutions
|
|
|
332,318
|
|
|
|
323,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
$
|
450,128
|
|
|
$
|
437,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services revenues included in continuing operations represent
revenues from enrollment services contracts for which the
Company is compensated based on volume of enrollments performed.
Solutions revenues comprise revenues from the delivery of
consumables and equipment, as well as hardware, software and
systems that include related services, primarily maintenance
bundled with the related product deliverables. Because the
product functionality is the primary deliverable for the
customer, we have included the total revenues from these
arrangements in solutions revenues. Solutions revenues also
include revenues related to drivers license production
contracts for which we provide systems and maintenance, produce
the licenses and are compensated in one all inclusive price per
license as the licenses are produced.
Revenues increased by $13.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2010 or 3 percent from the year ended
December 31, 2009. The increase from the prior year
reflects revenue growth in
L-1s
state drivers license contracts and hardware sales to India both
of which are included in the Solutions segment. In addition,
there were higher volumes in L-1s enrollment services
included in L-1s Services segment.
Approximately 26 percent of L-1 revenues from continuing
operations in 2010 and 2009 were derived from long-term service
contracts with the U.S. Federal and State governments
included in the L-1 Services reportable segment. These contracts
are fixed unit price contracts for which L-1 is compensated as
fingerprints are transmitted to the appropriate government
agency.
Approximately 27 percent of L-1 revenues from continuing
operations in 2010 and 2009 were derived from long-term
contracts for the production of drivers licenses and
credentials for which L-1 is compensated on a fixed unit price
per license or credential produced. The unit price for these
contracts is fixed throughout the term of the contract. The
prices are established in competitive bids in which price is one
among many important criteria evaluated by the customer.
42
The remaining revenues, including other revenues from the
drivers licenses contracts which are not based on card
production volumes, comprise 47 percent of revenues for the
years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 and were derived
from contracts and purchase orders for consumables, hardware,
software and custom solutions, including maintenance. These
revenues are priced at prevailing prices at the time the order
or contract is negotiated. These orders and contracts are often
competitively bid, although some, particularly consumables sold
pursuant to driver license and credential contracts, are sole
source. Most of L-1 research, engineering and development and
sales and marketing costs are related to generating these
revenues.
Cost
of Revenues and Gross Margin (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Cost of revenues, excluding items noted below
|
|
$
|
295,021
|
|
|
$
|
280,340
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
28,402
|
|
|
|
23,021
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
|
|
|
5,229
|
|
|
|
5,349
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
1,053
|
|
|
|
873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
329,705
|
|
|
$
|
309,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
120,423
|
|
|
$
|
127,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
27%
|
|
|
|
29%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues increased by $20.1 million or 6% for the
year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the year ended
December 31, 2009 which is consistent of the increase in
revenues. Gross margin for 2010 was 27 percent compared to
29 percent in 2009. The decrease was due primarily to
higher growth in revenues from lower margin enrollment services
relative to the growth in L-1s higher margin biometrics
and credentialing solutions, which was also impacted by more
competitive pricing in biometric products.
Included in the cost of revenues were $34.7 million and
$29.2 million of non-cash charges for the years ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, which increased
by $5.5 million, reflecting higher depreciation from our
credentialing business. These non-cash charges reduced gross
margins by 8 percent and 7 percent for the years ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Sales
and Marketing Expenses (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Sales and marketing expenses
|
|
$
|
37,193
|
|
|
$
|
38,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of revenues
|
|
|
8%
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing expenses decreased by approximately
$1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010
compared to the prior year. The decrease is attributable to cost
reductions from synergies and rationalization in certain of L-1
businesses. Sales and marketing expenses consists primarily of
salaries and costs including stock-based compensation,
commissions, travel and entertainment expenses, promotions and
other marketing and sales support expenses.
Research
and Development Expenses (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
$
|
22,309
|
|
|
$
|
20,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of revenues
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
Research and development expenses increased by approximately
$1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2010
compared to the prior year.
L-1
continues to focus on enhancing
L-1 credentialing
and biometric solutions offerings while maximizing L-1s
research costs to focus on those activities with the greatest
technological and revenue potential. Gross research and
development expenses were offset by lower utilization of
research and development resources in the performance of
contracts, the cost of which is included in cost of revenues and
in capital projects. Gross research and development expenditures
aggregated to $50.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2010 compared to $46.9 million in the
prior year. Virtually all of L-1s research and development
costs are attributable to the Solutions segment. As a percentage
of Solutions revenues, gross research and development costs were
15 percent for the years ended December 31, 2010 and
2009. Research and development expenses consist primarily of
salaries and related personnel costs, including stock-based
compensation and other costs related to the design, development,
testing and enhancement of L-1 products.
General
and Administrative Expenses (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
$
|
59,567
|
|
|
$
|
54,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As percentage of revenues
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense increased approximately by
$4.6 million for year ended December 31, 2010 compared
to 2009. The increase relates to employee related expenses
including stock-based compensation. As a percentage of revenues,
general and administrative expenses remained flat at
13 percent for the years ended December 31, 2010 and
2009. General and administrative costs in 2009 also include a
provision of $1.2 million related to suspension of the
Registered Traveler program. General and administrative expenses
consist primarily of salaries and related personnel costs,
including stock-based compensation for L-1s executive and
administrative personnel, professional and Board of
Directors fees, public and investor relations and
insurance.
Asset
Impairments and Acquisition Related Expenses (in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Asset impairments and Acquisition Related Expenses
|
|
$
|
3,150
|
|
|
$
|
662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The asset impairment charge in 2010 primarily related to the
Companys decision not to participate in the restart of the
Registered Traveler program. In 2009 the Company recorded
$0.7 million related to potential acquisitions that were
not consummated.
Strategic
Alternative Transactions Costs and Other (in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Strategic alternative transactions costs and other
|
|
$
|
11,070
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategic alternative transactions costs were $11.1 million
for the year ended December 31, 2010 and primarily
represent legal and advisory costs incurred in connection with
the exploration of strategic alternatives in 2010, and exclude
costs attributable to the Intel Business.
44
Financing
Costs (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Financing costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual interest
|
|
|
(9,686
|
)
|
|
|
(7,809
|
)
|
Other financing costs
|
|
|
(7,339
|
)
|
|
|
(6,857
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing costs
|
|
$
|
(17,025
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,666
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2010, financing costs
increased by approximately $2.4 million compared to the
prior year as a result of increased borrowings outstanding under
the revolving credit facility. Financing costs are net of
amounts attributed to discontinued operations of
$23.7 million and $26.6 million in 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Other
Expense, Net (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Other expense, net
|
|
$
|
(338
|
)
|
|
$
|
(324
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense, net includes interest income and realized and
unrealized currency transaction gains and losses on foreign
currency transactions, which are related primarily to changes in
the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the Canadian
Dollar and the Japanese Yen during the periods.
Income
Taxes (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
|
|
$
|
20,215
|
|
|
$
|
1,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 2010 results reflect an income tax benefit of
$20.2 million, primarily reflecting an increase in deferred
tax assets as a result of current year temporary differences of
$12.0 million, as well as a reduction of the valuation
allowance related to the estimated utilization of net operating
loss carryforwards of $9.0 million. At December 31,
2010, the Company had U.S. Federal net operating loss
carryforwards of $477.2 million, which may be used to
reduce future taxable income. In addition, the Company has
$145.2 million of deductible goodwill, of which
$46.4 million relates to continuing operations. Management
evaluated the adequacy of the valuation allowance in light of
the results for the year based on the cumulative results of
operations for the three years ended December 31, 2010,
after considering items that do not enter in the determination
of taxable income, and the likely future operating results,
including the expected tax gain from the sale of the Intel
Business. Management will continue to evaluate the adequacy of
the valuation allowance annually, and when its assessment of
whether it is more likely than not that the related tax benefits
will be realized changes, the valuation allowance will be
increased or reduced with a corresponding benefit or charge
included in income.
The 2009 results reflect an income tax benefit of
$1.3 million, primarily reflecting an increase in deferred
tax assets as a result of current year temporary differences,
net of the utilization of net operating losses to offset
estimated net taxable income. At December 31, 2009, the
Company had U.S. Federal net operating loss carryforwards
of $447.7 million, which may be used to reduce future
taxable income. In addition, the Company has $159.5 million
of deductible goodwill, of which $51.8 million relates to
continuing operations. Management evaluated the adequacy of the
valuation allowance in light of the results for the year based
on the cumulative results of operations for the three years
ended December 31, 2009, after considering items that do
not enter in the determination of taxable income, and the likely
future operating results. The review indicated that the recorded
valuation allowance related to net operating losses was adequate
as of December 31, 2009.
45
Comprehensive
Loss (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(16,465
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,003
|
)
|
Changes in accumulated comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
|
|
1,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(16,617
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,124
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in comprehensive loss results from the net loss in
2010 of $16.5 million compared to $4.0 million in
2009, (the components of which are described above), changes in
the fair value and amortization of derivatives accounted for as
hedges which resulted in a net gain of $0.3 million in 2010
and $0.5 million in 2009. In addition, there were
translation losses of $0.5 million and gains of
$1.4 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively, resulting from
the changes in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to
foreign currencies, primarily the Euro and the Canadian Dollar.
Comparison
of 2009 to 2008
Revenues
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Services
|
|
$
|
113,445
|
|
|
$
|
77,428
|
|
Solutions
|
|
|
323,684
|
|
|
|
280,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
437,129
|
|
|
$
|
358,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
and Services Revenues
The following represents details of the products and services
for revenues for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Federal government services
|
|
$
|
35,737
|
|
|
$
|
19,535
|
|
State and local government services
|
|
|
77,708
|
|
|
|
57,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Services
|
|
|
113,445
|
|
|
|
77,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solutions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and local government solutions
|
|
|
117,547
|
|
|
|
67,723
|
|
Hardware and consumables
|
|
|
116,305
|
|
|
|
137,590
|
|
Software licensing fees and other
|
|
|
56,047
|
|
|
|
46,126
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
33,785
|
|
|
|
29,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Solutions
|
|
|
323,684
|
|
|
|
280,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
$
|
437,129
|
|
|
$
|
358,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services revenues included in continuing operations represent
revenues from enrollment services contracts for which the
Company is compensated based on volume of enrollments performed.
Solutions revenues comprise revenues from the delivery of
consumables and equipment, as well as hardware, software and
systems that include related services, primarily maintenance
bundled with the related product deliverables. Because the
product functionality is the primary deliverable for the
customer, we have included the total revenues from these
arrangements in solutions revenues. Solutions revenues also
include revenues related to drivers license production
contracts for which we provide systems and maintenance, produce
the licenses and are compensated in one all inclusive price per
license as the licenses are produced.
46
Revenues increased by $79.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009, of which $59.9 million related to
the Acquisitions. Excluding the impact of the Acquisitions,
revenues increased $19.1 million or 6 percent from the
year ended December 31, 2008. The increase from the prior
year is a result of increased revenue and new contracts in
L-1s enrollment services included in L-1s Services
segment.
Approximately 26 percent and 22 percent of L-1
revenues in 2009 and 2008 were derived from long-term service
contracts with the U.S. Federal and State governments
included in the L-1 Services reportable segment. These contracts
are fixed unit price contracts for which L-1 is compensated as
fingerprints are transmitted to the appropriate government
agency for fingerprinting services.
Approximately 27 percent and 19 percent of L-1
revenues in 2009 and 2008, respectively, were derived from
long-term contracts for the production of drivers licenses
and credentials for which L-1 is compensated on a fixed unit
price per license or credential produced. The unit price for
these contracts is fixed throughout the term of the contract.
The prices are established in competitive bids in which price is
one among many important criteria evaluated by the customer.
The remaining revenues, including other revenues from the
drivers licenses contracts which are not based on card
production volumes, comprise 47 percent and 59 percent
of revenues for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, and were derived from contracts and purchase
orders for consumables, hardware, software and custom solutions,
including maintenance. These revenues are priced at prevailing
prices at the time the order or contract is negotiated. These
orders and contracts are often competitively bid, although some,
particularly consumables sold pursuant to driver license and
credential contracts, are sole source. Most of L-1 research and
development and sales and marketing costs are related to
generating these revenues.
Cost
of Revenues and Gross Margin (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cost of revenues, excluding items noted below
|
|
$
|
280,340
|
|
|
$
|
211,450
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
23,021
|
|
|
|
17,098
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
|
|
|
5,349
|
|
|
|
21,564
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
873
|
|
|
|
987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
309,583
|
|
|
$
|
251,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
127,546
|
|
|
$
|
107,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues increased by $58.5 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended
December 31, 2008, of which $44.4 million is related
to the Acquisitions. Excluding the Acquisitions, cost of
revenues increased by $14.1 million or 6 percent in
2009 compared to the previous year, which is consistent with the
increase in revenues. Gross margin for 2009 was 29 percent
compared to 30 percent in 2008. The decrease was due
primarily to increased revenue from lower margin enrollment
services offset in part by the growth in L-1s higher
margin biometrics solutions.
Included in the cost of revenues were $29.2 million and
$39.6 million of non-cash charges for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which decreased
by $10.4 million, reflecting lower amortization in 2009
resulting from intangible asset impairments recorded in 2008,
offset by additional amortization related to the Acquisitions.
This decrease was offset by higher depreciation resulting from
the acquisition of Digimarc. These non-cash charges reduced
gross margins by 7 percent and 11 percent for the
years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
47
Sales
and Marketing Expenses (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Sales and marketing expenses
|
|
$
|
38,651
|
|
|
$
|
36,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of revenues
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing expenses increased by approximately
$2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009
compared to the prior year. Excluding the effects of the
Acquisitions, sales and marketing expenses decreased by
$2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009.
These decreases are attributable to cost reductions from
synergies and rationalization in certain of L-1 businesses,
offset by continued investment in increasing sales and
international marketing resources. Sales and marketing expenses
consists primarily of salaries and costs including stock-based
compensation, commissions, travel and entertainment expenses,
promotions and other marketing and sales support expenses.
Research
and Development Expenses (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
$
|
20,730
|
|
|
$
|
25,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of revenues
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses decreased by approximately
$4.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009
compared to the prior year. Excluding the effects of the
Acquisitions, research and development expenses in 2009
decreased by $1.7 million. L-1 continues to focus on
enhancing L-1 credentialing and biometric solutions offerings
while maximizing L-1s research costs to focus on those
activities with the greatest technological and revenue
potential. Gross research and development expenses were offset
by higher utilization of research and development resources in
the performance of contracts, the cost of which is included in
cost of revenues and in other projects. Gross research and
development expenditures aggregated to $46.9 million for
the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to
$43.0 million in the prior year. Virtually all of
L-1s research and development costs are attributable to
the Solutions segment. As a percentage of Solutions revenues,
gross research and development costs were 15 percent for
the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. Research and
development expenses consist primarily of salaries and related
personnel costs, including stock-based compensation and other
costs related to the design, development, testing and
enhancement of L-1 products.
General
and Administrative Expenses (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
$
|
54,953
|
|
|
$
|
49,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As percentage of revenues
|
|
|
13%
|
|
|
|
14%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense increased approximately by
$5.8 million for year ended December 31, 2009 compared
to 2008, which is directly related to the Acquisitions.
Excluding the effects of the Acquisitions, the general and
administrative expenses remained flat as the Company continues
to realize operating leverage by increasing revenue without
corresponding increases in general and administrative expenses.
As a percentage of revenues, general and administrative expenses
decreased to 13 percent, as compared to 14 percent in
the prior year and reflects the impact of improved leverage.
General and administrative costs in 2009 also include a
provision of $1.2 million related to suspension of the
Registered Traveler program. General and administrative expenses
consist primarily of salaries and related personnel costs,
including stock-based compensation for L-1s executive and
administrative personnel, professional and Board of
Directors fees, public and investor relations and
insurance.
48
Asset
Impairments and Acquisition Related Expenses (in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Asset impairments and acquisition related expenses
|
|
$
|
662
|
|
|
$
|
529,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2008, assets impairments consist of goodwill of
$430.0 million and long-lived assets of $98.6 million,
principally intangible assets recorded in connection with
acquisitions, and relate principally to the Companys
biometrics businesses included in the Solutions segment. The
impairment charges resulted from the deteriorating economic
conditions that manifested themselves in the fourth quarter of
2008 as well as capital market conditions that adversely
impacted valuation of businesses L-1 acquired and the
Companys stock prices and market capitalization. The
remaining $1.1 million related to merger related expense
for the Old Digimarc acquisition. In 2009 the Company incurred
transaction costs of $0.7 million related to potential
acquisitions that were not consummated.
Strategic
Alternative Transaction Costs and Other (in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Strategic alternative transaction costs and other
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2008, the Company recorded acquisition-related intangible
amortization for assets that were impaired in 2008, for which no
comparable amortization was recorded in 2009.
Financing
Costs (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Financing costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual interest
|
|
|
(7,809
|
)
|
|
|
(7,300
|
)
|
Other financing costs
|
|
|
(6,857
|
)
|
|
|
(5,981
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing costs
|
|
$
|
(14,666
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,281
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2009, net financing costs
increased by approximately $1.4 million compared to the
prior year as a result of increased borrowings under L-1s
credit facility in August 2008, incurred primarily to fund the
acquisitions, as well as higher interest rates. Interest expense
is net of amounted attributed to discontinued operations of
$26.6 million and $14.6 million in 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Other
Income (Expense), Net (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
(324
|
)
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net includes interest income and
realized and unrealized currency transaction gains and losses on
foreign currency transactions. The increases in other income
(expense), net are related primarily to changes in the value of
the U.S. dollar relative to the Canadian Dollar and the
Japanese Yen during the periods.
Income
Taxes (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
|
|
$
|
1,325
|
|
|
$
|
(7,643
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
The 2009 results reflect an income tax benefit of
$1.3 million, primarily reflecting an increase in deferred
tax assets as a result of current year temporary differences,
net of the utilization of net operating losses to offset
estimated net taxable income. At December 31, 2009, the
Company had U.S. Federal net operating loss carryforwards
of $447.7 million, which may be used to reduce future
taxable income. In addition, the Company has $159.5 million
of deductible goodwill, of which $51.8 million relates to
continuing operations. Management evaluated the adequacy of the
valuation allowance in light of the results for the year based
on the cumulative results of operations for the three years
ended December 31, 2009, after considering items that do
not enter in the determination of taxable income, and the likely
future operating results. The review indicated that the recorded
valuation allowance related to net operating losses is adequate
as of December 31, 2009.
The 2008 results reflect an income tax expense of
$7.6 million, primarily reflecting an increase in the
deferred tax asset valuation allowance of approximately
$48.0 million offset by the deferred benefit of
$42.3 million primarily related to the impairment of
long-lived assets recorded for the year (excluding the impact of
the goodwill impairment which is not deductible for income tax
purposes), and a current tax provision of $1.9 million.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, management evaluated the
adequacy of the valuation allowance in light of the results for
the year and determined that, based on the cumulative results of
operations for the three years ended December 31, 2008,
after considering items that do not enter in the determination
of taxable income, and the likely future operating results, it
was more likely than not that the portion of the tax benefits of
its net operating loss carryforwards that would not be realized
would be higher than previously recorded. As a result, the
Company increased the deferred tax asset valuation allowance to
reflect the estimated tax benefits it expected to realize.
Comprehensive
Loss (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(4,003
|
)
|
|
$
|
(551,594
|
)
|
Changes in accumulated comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
1,879
|
|
|
|
(7,664
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(2,124
|
)
|
|
$
|
(559,258
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in comprehensive loss results from the net loss in
2009 of $4.0 million compared to $551.6 million in
2008, (the components of which are described above) changes in
the fair value and amortization of derivatives accounted for as
hedges which resulted in a net gain of $0.5 million in 2009
and $1.1 million loss in 2008. There were translation gains
of $1.4 million and losses of $6.6 million in 2009 and
2008, respectively, resulting from the changes in the value of
the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies, primarily
the Euro and the Canadian Dollar.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Capital
Requirements
The Companys most significant capital requirements are
capital expenditures for new secure credentialing contracts,
research and development and working capital needs. The most
significant capital expenditures are related to
L-1s
Solutions segment. Generally, new State drivers license
contracts provide for up front capital expenditures necessary to
perform under the contract. As expected, with the acquisition of
Old Digimarc,
L-1s
capital requirements have increased as
L-1 has bid
on and was awarded new contracts or as contracts have been
renewed. In 2010,
L-1s
capital expenditures decreased to $45.0 million compared to
$55.0 million in 2009.
L-1 expects
capital expenditures to approximate $40.0 million in 2011
as we complete the build out of systems from recently awarded
contracts.
L-1 expects
to
fund L-1s
capital requirements primarily with operating cash flows.
Liquidity
As of December 31, 2010,
L-1 had
$27.4 million of working capital including assets held for
sale of $271.3 million, related liabilities of
$42.1 million, including net deferred income tax
liabilities of $15.7 million), current maturities of long
term debt of $271.4 million, deferred income assets of
$40.9 million and cash
50
and cash equivalents of $3.1 million. In addition,
L-1 has
financing arrangements, as further described below, available to
support
L-1s
ongoing liquidity needs, pursuant to which
L-1 has
available $68.9 million at December 31, 2010 under
L-1s
revolving credit facility, subject to continuing compliance with
debt covenants. As a result of the consummation of the sale of
the Intel Business to BAE, the Company repaid approximately
$289.3 million of its debt.
L-1 believes
that its existing cash and cash equivalent balances, existing
financing arrangements and cash flows from operations will be
sufficient to meet
L-1s
operating and debt service requirements for the next
12 months.
L-1 expects
that the sale the Company to Safran will result in the repayment
of substantially all existing debt of the Company including the
Convertible Notes. However, if the Safran transaction is not
consummated, it is likely that we will require additional
financing to improve our liquidity and in that connection, we
evaluate financing needs and the terms and conditions and
availability under our credit facility on a regular basis and
consider other financing options.
L-1 may also
pursue reduction of our current indebtedness if equity financing
can be obtained on advantageous terms and may take other actions
to improve liquidity. There can be no assurance that additional
debt or equity financing will be available or that other actions
can be taken on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.
L-1s
ability to meet our business plan is dependent on a number of
factors, including those described in the section of this report
entitled Risk Factors.
Credit
Agreement
On August 5, 2008,
L-1 entered
into a Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the
Credit Agreement), among
L-1s
wholly owned subsidiary
L-1 Identity
Operating,
L-1, Bank of
America, N.A., Wachovia Bank, National Association, Banc of
America Securities LLC and Wachovia Capital Markets LLC, to
amend and restate the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, by
and among
L-1, Bank of
America, N.A. (Administrative Agent), Bear Stearns
Corporate Lending, Inc., Bear Stearns & Co., Inc.,
Banc of America Securities LLC, Wachovia Bank, N.A. and Credit
Suisse, Cayman Islands Branch. The Credit Agreement provided for
a senior secured term loan facility in an aggregate principal
amount of up to $300.0 million, with a term of five years,
and a senior secured revolving credit facility in an aggregate
principal amount of up to $135.0 million. The proceeds of
the senior secured facilities were used to (i) fund, in
part, the purchase price paid, and fees and expenses incurred,
in connection with
L-1s
acquisition of Digimarc Corporation after giving effect to the
spin-off of its digital watermarking business (Old
Digimarc), (ii) repay borrowings under
L-1s
then existing revolving credit facility and (iii) provide
ongoing working capital and fund other general corporate
purposes of
L-1. As of
December 31, 2010, the Company has approximately
$68.9 million available under its revolving credit
facility, subject to continuing compliance with covenants under
the credit agreement.
On July 9, 2009,
L-1 entered
into an amendment to the Credit Agreement pursuant to which the
term loans under the Credit Agreement have been split into two
tranches: the
Tranche B-1
Term Loan and the
Tranche B-2
Term Loan. The
Tranche B-1
Term Loan, with an aggregate principal amount of approximately
$128.1 million at December 31, 2010, requires annual
principal payments (payable quarterly) of 10 percent of the
original principal amount through September 30, 2010,
20 percent of the original principal amount through
September 30, 2012, and thereafter, increasing over the
duration of the Credit Agreement. The
Tranche B-2
Term Loan, with an aggregate principal amount of approximately
$131.8 million at December 31, 2010, requires annual
principal payments (also payable quarterly) of 1 percent of
the related original principal amounts over the remaining term
of the Credit Agreement. After the consummation of the sale of
the Intel Business to BAE, the borrowings outstanding under the
term loans were fully repaid and the borrowings under the
revolving credit facility were reduced to $56.2 million. At
December 31, 2010, there were $57.9 million of
borrowings that were outstanding under the revolving credit
facility.
Under the terms of the amended senior secured credit facility,
the Company has the option to borrow at LIBOR (subject to a
floor of 3 percent) plus 2.75 percent to
5.0 percent per annum or at prime (subject to a floor of
2 percent) plus 1.75 percent to 4.0 percent per
annum. L-1
is required to pay a fee of 0.5 percent on the unused
portion of the revolving credit facility. All obligations of
L-1
Operating under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed on a senior
secured basis by
L-1 and by
each of
L-1s
existing and subsequently acquired or organized direct or
indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries (subject to certain
exceptions). At
51
December 31, 2010, the interest rates were
6.75 percent for
Tranche B-1
Term Loans, 7.25 percent for
Tranche B-2
Term Loans and 6.0 percent for borrowings under the
revolving credit facility.
L-1 is
required to maintain the following financial covenants under the
Credit Agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Debt Service Coverage Ratio. As of the
end of any fiscal quarter, the ratio of Consolidated EBITDA (as
defined in the Credit Agreement) of
L-1
Operating and its consolidated subsidiaries for the period of
four consecutive fiscal quarters ending on or immediately prior
to such date to the sum of (i) Consolidated Interest
Charges (as defined in the Credit Agreement) of
L-1
Operating and its consolidated subsidiaries paid or payable in
cash during the period of four consecutive fiscal quarters ended
on or immediately prior to such date, plus
(ii) Consolidated Debt Amortization (as defined in the
Credit Agreement) of
L-1
Operating and its consolidated subsidiaries as of such date,
shall not be less than 2.25:1.00. These financial covenants have
been amended as described below.
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Debt Coverage Ratio. As of the end of
any fiscal quarter, the ratio of
L-1
Operatings Consolidated Funded Indebtedness (as defined in
the Credit Agreement which excludes standby letters of credit
issued in connection with performance bonds) as of such date to
its Consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement) for
the period of four consecutive fiscal quarters ended on or
immediately prior to such date, may not be more than:
(i) 3.25:1.00 from the Closing Date (as defined in the
Credit Agreement) to and including March 30, 2010,
(ii) 3.00:1.00 from March 31, 2010 to March 30,
2011, and (iii) 2.75:1.00 at the end of each fiscal quarter
thereafter. These financial covenants have been amended as
described below.
|
On August 30, 2010,
L-1 entered
into an amendment and consent (the Third Amendment)
to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of
August 5, 2008, among
L-1 Identity
Solutions Operating Company, the Company, Bank of America, N.A.,
the Lenders party thereto, Wachovia Bank, National Association,
Banc of America Securities LLC and Wachovia Capital Markets LLC
(as amended, the Credit Agreement). The Third
Amendment extends the time period during which previously
modified financial covenants will apply under the Credit
Agreement, subject to the Company entering into definitive
agreements providing for the sale of all or substantially all of
the assets and operations of the Company and its subsidiaries in
connection with its strategic alternatives review by
September 30, 2010, which the Company executed on
September 19, 2010. The Third Amendment provides that the
minimum Consolidated Debt Service Coverage Ratio of 1.65 to 1.00
will remain in effect for the third fiscal quarter of 2010 and
the period through and including March 30, 2011, after
which the minimum Consolidated Debt Service Coverage Ratio shall
return to 2.25 to 1.00 for each fiscal quarter thereafter, and
the maximum Consolidated Leverage Ratio of 3.85 to 1.00 remain
in effect for the third fiscal quarter of 2010 and the period
through and including March 30, 2011, after which the
maximum Consolidated Leverage Ratio shall return to 2.75 to 1.00
for each fiscal quarter thereafter. At December 31, 2010
the Companys Consolidated Debt Service Coverage Ratio was
1.79:1.00 and the Consolidated Leverage Ratio was 3.50:1.00;
accordingly the Company was in compliance with the modified
financial covenants. On a pro forma basis giving effect to the
BAE sale and the repayment of long term debt as if it had
occurred on January 1, 2010, the pro forma debt service
coverage ratio would have been 6.40: 1.00 and the pro forma
leverage ratio would have been 0.55: 1.00.
Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, as amended,
L-1
Operating may incur, assume or guarantee unsecured subordinated
indebtedness in an amount up to $200.0 million, provided
that no default or event of default shall have occurred or would
occur as a result of the incurrence of such subordinated debt
and the borrower and its subsidiaries are in pro forma
compliance, after giving effect to the incurrence of such
subordinated debt, with each of the covenants in the Credit
Agreement, including, without limitation, the financial
covenants described above.
Pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement, as amended,
L-1 may
incur, assume or guarantee any amount of unsecured subordinated
indebtedness, provided, that no default or event of default
shall have occurred or would occur as a result of the incurrence
of such subordinated debt and the pro forma Consolidated
Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) of
L-1 and its
subsidiaries after giving effect to the incurrence of such
subordinated debt shall be less than 4.75:1.00. The Credit
Agreement limits
52
the ability of
L-1 to
(i) pay dividends or other distributions or repurchase
capital stock, (ii) create, incur, assume or suffer to
exist any indebtedness, (iii) create, incur, assume or
suffer to exist liens upon any of its property, assets or
revenues, (iv) sell, transfer, license, lease or otherwise
dispose of any property, (v) make or become legally
obligated to make capital expenditures above certain thresholds,
subject to certain permitted adjustments, (vi) make
investments, including acquisitions, and (vii) enter into
transactions with affiliates. These covenants are subject to a
number of exceptions and qualifications. The Credit Agreement
provides for customary events of default which include (subject
in certain cases to customary grace and cure periods), among
others: nonpayment, breach of covenants or other agreements in
the Credit Agreement or the other Loan Documents (as defined in
the Credit Agreement), payment defaults or acceleration of other
indebtedness, failure to pay certain judgments, inability to pay
debts as they become due and certain events of bankruptcy,
insolvency or reorganization.
If an event of default, including a change in control (as
defined in the Credit Agreement) occurs, the Administrative
Agent may, with the consent of the Required Lenders declare all
outstanding indebtedness including accrued and unpaid interest
under the Credit Agreement to be due and payable.
The Company has entered into interest rate protection agreements
to reduce its exposure to the variable interest rate payments on
its term loan. In October 2008, the Company entered into an
interest rate protection agreement with a notional amount of
$62.5 million, which expires in November, 2011. Under the
term of the agreement, the Company pays the counter party a
fixed rate of 4.1 percent and receives variable interest
based on three-month LIBOR (subject to a floor of
3.0 percent). In May 2009, the Company entered into two
additional interest rate protection agreements with notional
amounts of $50.0 million each, pursuant to which the
Company pays a fixed rate of 1.4 percent and receives three
month LIBOR. The Company settled the agreements in February 2011.
Convertible
Senior Notes
On May 17, 2007, the Company issued $175.0 million of
Convertible Notes with a conversion feature which allows the
Company the option to settle the debt either in shares of common
stock or to settle the principal amount in cash and the
conversion spread in cash or stock. The proceeds of the
Convertible Notes offering, net of deferred financing costs
amounted to $168.7 million. In connection with the issuance
of the Convertible Notes,
L-1 entered
into an agreement with Bear Stearns (now JP Morgan Chase) to
purchase approximately 3.5 million shares of
L-1s
common stock for approximately $69.8 million for delivery
in May 2012. However,
L-1 settled
its obligation at the date the prepaid forward agreement was
executed for cash.
The Notes are governed by an indenture, dated May 17, 2007
(the Indenture), between the Company and the
trustee. The Notes will be convertible only under certain
circumstances, as described below. If, at the time of
conversion, the daily volume-weighted average price per share
for a 25 trading day period calculated in accordance with the
Indenture (as defined in greater detail in the Indenture,
VWAP) of the Companys common stock is less
than or equal to $32.00 per share, which is referred to as the
base conversion price, the Notes will be convertible into
31.25 shares of common stock of the Company per $1,000
principal amount of the Notes, subject to adjustment upon the
occurrence of certain events. If, at the time of conversion, the
VWAP of the shares of common stock of the Company exceeds the
base conversion price of $32.00 per share, the conversion rate
will be determined pursuant to a formula resulting in
holders receipt of up to an additional 14 shares of
common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the Notes, subject
to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events and
determined as set forth in the Indenture. As an example, if the
volume-weighted price per share (VWAP) of the Company stock were
to increase to $40.00 per share, the additional shares issuable
upon conversion would be 2.8, and the shares issuable per $1,000
principal amount of the Notes would be 34.05.
The Notes are convertible until the close of business on the
second business day immediately preceding May 15, 2027, in
multiples of $1,000 in principal amount, at the option of the
holder under the following circumstances: (1) during the
five
business-day
period after any five consecutive trading day period (the
measurement period) in which the trading price per
Note, for each day of such measurement period was less than
98 percent of the product of the last reported sale price
of shares of common stock of the Company and
53
the applicable conversion rate for such trading day;
(2) during any fiscal quarter, if the last reported sale
price of shares of common stock of the Company for 20 or more
trading days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending
on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar
quarter is greater than or equal to 130 percent of the base
conversion price on the related trading day; (3) if the
Company calls any or all of the Notes for redemption; and
(4) upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions
described in the Indenture, including for a specified period of
time prior to a change in control transaction. Upon conversion,
the Company has the right to deliver shares of common stock
based upon the applicable conversion rate, or a combination of
cash and shares of common stock, if any, based on a daily
conversion value as described above calculated on a
proportionate basis for each trading day of a 25
trading-day
observation period. In the event of a fundamental change as
specified in the Indenture, which includes a change in control
transaction, the Company will increase the conversion rate by a
number of additional shares of common stock specified in the
Indenture, or, in lieu thereof, the Company may in certain
circumstances elect to adjust the conversion rate and related
conversion obligation so that the Notes will become convertible
into shares of the acquiring or surviving Company. In connection
with the Safran merger, the Company delivered a conversion
notice, and expects that the conversion price will be equal to
the base conversion price. The Notes will not become convertible
into shares of Safran in connection with the merger.
The Notes bear interest at a rate of 3.75 percent per year
payable semiannually in arrears in cash on May 15 and
November 15. The Notes will mature on May 15, 2027,
unless earlier converted, redeemed or repurchased. The Company
may redeem the Notes at its option, in whole or in part, on or
after May 20, 2012, subject to prior notice as provided in
the Indenture. The redemption price during that period will be
equal to the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed, plus
any accrued and unpaid interest. The holders may require the
Company to repurchase the Notes for cash on May 15, 2012,
May 15, 2017 and May 15, 2020.
Upon consummation of any share exchange, consolidation of merger
of L-1
pursuant to which its common stock will be converted into cash,
securities or other property or any sale, lease or other
transfer in one transaction or a series of transactions of all
or substantially all of
L-1s
and
L-1s
subsidiaries assets, taken as a whole, to any person other
than one of its subsidiaries, the holders of the Convertible
Notes can require the Company to convert or to repurchase all
outstanding debt at a purchase price equal to 100 percent
of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest. It is
expected that the holders of the Notes will exercise their
rights to require the Company to purchase the Notes upon closing
of the consummation of the merger of the Company with Safran.
Equity
Securities
On August 5, 2008, pursuant to the terms and conditions of
(i) the Securities Purchase Agreement, by and between
L-1 and
Robert V. LaPenta (the LaPenta Agreement),
(ii) the Securities Purchase Agreement (the Iridian
Agreement), by and between
L-1 and
Iridian Asset Management LLC (Iridian) and
(iii) the LRSR Agreement (together with the LaPenta
Agreement and Iridian Agreement, the Investor
Agreements).
L-1 issued
an aggregate of 8,083,472 shares of
L-1 common
stock and 15,107 shares of Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock (the Series A Preferred Stock)
for aggregate proceeds to
L-1 of
$119.0 million, net of related issuance costs, which were
used to fund a portion of
L-1s
acquisition of Old Digimarc. In accordance with its terms, the
Series A Preferred Stock was subsequently converted into
1,310,992 shares of common stock. See Note 4 for
additional information.
54
Consolidated
Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For The Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
21,489
|
|
|
$
|
60,602
|
|
|
$
|
52,768
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(56,833
|
)
|
|
|
(66,246
|
)
|
|
|
(350,919
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
31,800
|
|
|
|
(8,521
|
)
|
|
|
310,820
|
|
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
(423
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
(3,539
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,825
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison
of 2010 to 2009
Cash flows from operating activities including discontinued
operations, decreased by approximately $39.1 million for
the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the
corresponding period of the prior year. Net loss for the year
ended December 31, 2010 was $16.5 million and includes
non-cash charges of $41.7 million for depreciation and
amortization, $25.6 million for stock-based compensation
and retirement contributions settled or to be settled in common
stock, $11.8 million for amortization of deferred financing
costs, debt discount and other, and $21.8 million for
non-cash income tax benefit and asset impairments of
$3.6 million. Operating cash flows reflect the impact of
changes in operating assets and liabilities which had an adverse
impact on cash flows of $22.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2010 and an adverse impact on cash flows of
$5.4 million in the corresponding period in the prior year.
Cash used for investing activities in 2010, consisting
principally of payments for capital expenditures of
$45.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010,
which decreased from $55.0 million in the prior year and
are primarily related to
L-1s
drivers license business.
Net cash provided by financing activities in 2010 was
$31.8 million compared to $8.5 used by financing activities
in 2009. L-1
had borrowings of $87.1 million related to the revolving
credit facility and repaid $34.0 million and
$22.1 million related to the revolving credit facility and
the term loans, respectively, in 2010. During 2009,
L-1 repaid
$15.1 million of long-term debt and had net borrowings of
$4.9 million under
L-1s
revolving credit facility.
Comparison
of 2009 to 2008
Cash flows from operating activities including discontinued
operations, increased by approximately $7.8 million for the
year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to the
corresponding period of the prior year. Net loss for the year
ended December 31, 2009 was $4.0 million and includes
non-cash charges of $37.1 million for depreciation and
amortization, $23.7 million for stock-based compensation
and retirement contributions settled or to be settled in common
stock, $12.1 million for amortization of deferred financing
costs, debt discount and other, and $2.9 million for
non-cash income tax benefit. Operating cash flows reflect the
impact in accruals and deferrals related to operating assets and
liabilities which had an adverse impact on cash flows of
$5.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 and
an adverse impact on cash flows of $7.7 million in the
corresponding period in the prior year.
Cash used for acquisitions in 2009, consisting principally of
payments of acquisition related costs, totaled $3.7 million
for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to
$320.5 million for the same period in the prior year, which
was primarily related to the acquisition of Old Digimarc in
August 2008. Capital expenditures were approximately
$55.0 million and $22.5 million for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and are primarily
related to
L-1s
drivers license business.
Net cash used in financing activities in 2009 was
$8.5 million compared to $310.8 million provided from
financing activities in 2008.
L-1 repaid
$15.1 million of long-term debt during 2009 and had net
borrowings of $4.9 million under
L-1s
revolving credit facility.
L-1 had net
borrowings of $206.2 million in 2008 which was primarily
used to fund the Acquisitions.
L-1 paid
debt issuance costs of $0.8 million for the year ended
55
December 31, 2009 compared to $14.0 million in the
prior year. In 2008,
L-1
repurchased 362,000 shares of
L-1s
common stock for $6.2 million and
L-1 issued
common and preferred stock for net proceeds of
$119.0 million.
Working
Capital
December 31,
2010
As a result of the Company accounting for the Intel Business as
discontinued operations, working capital includes assets held
for sale of $271.3 million and related liabilities of
$42.1 million, including net deferred income tax
liabilities of $15.7 million. In addition, working capital
includes current maturities of long-term debt with a carrying
amount of $271.4 million, which was repaid from the
proceeds of the sale of the Intel Business.
Accounts receivable, including $42.0 million classified as
assets held for sale, increased by approximately
$28.7 million as of December 31, 2010 from
December 31, 2009, primarily due to increased revenues from
sales of hardware to India. Days sales outstanding at
December 31, 2010 was 74 days compared to 67 days
at December 31, 2009. Accounts receivables is net of an
allowance of $5.0 million and $4.9 million at
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. At
December 31, 2009, the allowance reflects additions
recorded in 2009 for the suspension of the Registered Traveler
program of approximately $1.2 million as well as
approximately $2.9 million for estimated unrecoverable
amounts related to enrollment services programs that started in
2009. During 2010, the net receivable related to the Registered
Traveler program was written off and the allowance was increased
for additional exposures for bad debts primarily at the
Enrollment Services segment.
Inventory increased by $3.3 million as of December 31,
2010, compared to December 31, 2009, primarily to meet
expected deliveries of
L-1s
credentialing and biometric solutions.
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities
including $24.8 million included in liabilities related to
discontinued operations, increased by $6.1 million as of
December 31, 2010, compared to December 31, 2009,
reflecting, liabilities and accruals of approximately
$1.5 million related to strategic alternative transaction
costs, additional benefit accruals which are settled in
subsequent periods, as well as timing of invoice payments.
Total deferred revenue decreased by $2.5 million as of
December 31, 2010, compared to December 31, 2009,
primarily as a result of the impact of lower maintenance
renewals in 2010 compared to 2009.
December 31,
2009
Accounts receivable increased by approximately
$10.7 million as of December 31, 2009 from
December 31, 2008, primarily due to increased revenues over
the prior year. Days sales outstanding at December 31, 2009
was 67 days compared to 66 days at December 31,
2008 Accounts receivables is net of an allowance of
$4.9 million and reflects additions recorded in 2009
related to the Registered Traveler program of $1.0 million,
as well as $2.8 million of unrecoverable amounts related to
enrollment services contracts started in 2009.
Inventory decreased by $5.1 million as of December 31,
2009, compared to December 31, 2008, primarily as a result
of planned reductions of
L-1s
biometrics and secure credentialing inventories. Inventory is
maintained at the levels required to meet expected deliveries of
L-1s
credentialing and biometric solutions.
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities
decreased by $3.9 million as of December 31, 2009,
compared to December 31, 2008, as a result of lower
accruals for incentive compensation and benefits and
professional fees.
Total deferred revenue decreased by $3.8 million as of
December 31, 2009, compared to December 31, 2008,
primarily as a result of recognition of revenues related to
transactions for which the Company received customer prepayments
in 2008.
56
Contractual
obligations
The following table sets forth
L-1s
contractual obligations as of December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than
|
|
|
Total
|
|
1 Year
|
|
2-3 Years
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
5 Years
|
|
Continuing Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
$
|
28,176
|
|
|
|
6,380
|
|
|
|
11,004
|
|
|
|
7,985
|
|
|
|
2,807
|
|
Debt and capital lease obligations
|
|
$
|
512,928
|
|
|
|
305,369
|
|
|
|
207,518
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
$
|
2,826
|
|
|
|
1,361
|
|
|
|
951
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
Included in debt are $175.0 million outstanding under
L-1s
Convertible Notes which bears interest at 3.75 percent and
$259.9 million in term loans of which
Tranche B-1
bears interest at 6.75 percent and
Tranche B-2
bears interest at 7.25 percent. The amount shown includes
interest assuming the Convertible Notes are redeemed at the end
of five years, in 2012. The table also reflects the repayment of
the term loans in full during 2011.
The Company has consulting agreements with two formerly related
parties under which each receives annual compensation of
$0.1 million through the earlier of January 2012 or
commencement of full time employment elsewhere. In addition, the
Company is subject to a royalty arrangement with a related party
whereby the Company is subject to royalty payments on certain of
its face recognition software revenue through June 30,
2014, up to a maximum $27.5 million.
In connection with the merger with Identix Incorporated
(Identix), Aston Capital Partners, LLC, an
affiliated Company, and
L-1 have
agreed in principle that the Company may, subject to the
approval of the Board of Directors, purchase AFIX Technologies,
Inc., a portfolio Company of Aston, at fair market value to be
determined by an independent appraiser retained by the
Companys Board of Directors. In March 2009,
L-1
concluded that due to a variety of factors, it was not advisable
to pursue the transaction to purchase AFIX at that time.
Contingent
obligations
L-1 has no
material contingent obligations at December 31, 2010.
Off
Balance Sheet Arrangements
L-1 does not
have any off balance sheet arrangements, transaction,
obligations or other relationships with unconsolidated entities
that would be expected to have a material effect on
L-1s
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Inflation
Although some of
L-1s
expenses increased with general inflation in the economy,
inflation has not had a material impact on
L-1s
financial results to date.
Critical
accounting policies and significant estimates
L-1 prepares
its consolidated financial statements in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America, or U.S. GAAP. Consistent with U.S. GAAP,
L-1 has
adopted accounting policies that
L-1 believes
are most appropriate given the conditions and circumstances of
L-1s
business. The application of these policies has a significant
impact on
L-1s
reported results of operations. In addition, some of these
policies require management to make assumptions and estimates.
These assumptions and estimates, which are based on historical
experience and analyses of current conditions and circumstances,
have a significant impact on
L-1s
reported results of operations and assets and liabilities and
disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. The most
significant assumptions and estimates relate to the allocation
of purchase price of the acquired businesses, assessing the
impairment of goodwill, other intangible assets and
57
property and equipment, revenue recognition estimating the
useful life of long lived assets, income taxes, contingencies,
litigation and valuation of financial instruments, including
warrants and stock options. If actual results differ
significantly from the estimates reflected in the financial
statements, there could be a material effect on
L-1s
consolidated financial statements.
Valuation
of goodwill and other long-lived assets
Excluding discontinued operations,
L-1s
long-lived assets include property and equipment, intangible
assets and goodwill. As of December 31, 2010 the balances
of property and equipment, intangible assets and goodwill, all
net of accumulated depreciation and amortization, were
$126.2 million, $61.3 million and $700.3 million,
respectively. In 2008,
L-1 recorded
impairments of goodwill and long-lived assets of
$430.0 million and $98.6 million, respectively. There
were no goodwill impairments recorded in 2010 and 2009, as the
estimated fair values of the reportable units significantly
exceeded their respective carrying amounts.
L-1 recorded
an impairment of long-lived assets of $3.1 million in 2010.
L-1
depreciates property and equipment and intangible assets that
have finite lives over their estimated useful lives. For
purposes of determining whether there are any impairment losses,
management evaluates the carrying amounts of identifiable
long-lived tangible and intangible assets, including their
estimated useful lives, when indicators of impairment are
present. If such indicators are present,
L-1 compares
the related undiscounted cash flows before interest and taxes to
the long-lived assets carrying amounts. If the undiscounted cash
flows are less than the carrying amounts, an impairment loss is
recorded based on the fair value of the asset, as compared to
the carrying amounts of the asset, such loss is recorded in the
period L-1
identified the impairment. Based on
L-1s
review of the carrying amounts of the long-lived tangible assets
with finite lives,
L-1 may also
determine that shorter estimated useful lives are appropriate.
In that event,
L-1 would
record depreciation and amortization over shorter future
periods, which would reduce
L-1s
earnings.
L-1s
most significant balances of property, plant and equipment
relate to capitalized costs incurred to build system assets for
L-1s
drivers license contracts.
L-1
periodically reviews the estimated useful lives of property and
equipment used in State drivers licenses contracts to
assess whether it is probable that the State will exercise its
option to extend contracts and
L-1 adjusts
the remaining estimated useful lives based on that assessment.
L-1 tests
goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, or earlier if
indicators of potential impairment exist, and to write-down
goodwill when impaired.
L-1
evaluates goodwill for impairment using the two-step process.
The first step is to compare the estimated fair value of the
reporting unit to the carrying amount of the reporting unit. If
the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value, a second
step must be followed to calculate impairment. Otherwise, if the
estimated fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying
amounts, the goodwill is not considered to be impaired as of the
measurement date.
L-1
historically estimated the fair value of
L-1s
reporting units primarily using the present value of future cash
flows, but also considering other factors such as
L-1s
market capitalization, an assessment of the fair value of the
reporting units based on comparable companies and comparable
transactions and multiples. In 2010, the Company based its
assessment primarily on the enterprise value reflected in the
sales prices of the Intel Business and the continuing operations
business as being more indicative of the enterprise value of the
reporting units. The date of
L-1s
annual goodwill impairment test was October 31, 2010 for
continuing operations and September 30, 2010 for
discontinued operations and the estimated fair values
significantly exceeded the carrying amounts.
Factors L-1
generally considers important and which could trigger an
impairment review of the carrying value of long-lived tangible
assets and goodwill include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Significant underperformance relative to expected operating
results.
|
|
|
|
Significant changes in the manner of use of assets or the
strategy for
L-1s
overall business.
|
|
|
|
Underutilization of
L-1s
tangible assets.
|
|
|
|
Discontinuance of product lines by
L-1 or its
customers.
|
|
|
|
Significant negative industry or economic trends.
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
Significant decline in
L-1 stock
price for a sustained period.
|
|
|
|
Significant decline in
L-1 market
capitalization relative to net book value.
|
Although L-1
believes that the remaining recorded amounts of
L-1s
long-lived tangible and intangible assets and goodwill were
realizable as of December 31, 2010, future events could
cause us to conclude otherwise.
If L-1 stock
price were to decrease and remain at that level for a sustained
period of time
L-1 may be
required to assess the carrying amount of goodwill and long
lived assets of
L-1
reporting units before
L-1s
next scheduled annual impairment test. If at that time the
estimated fair values of
L-1
reporting units are less than their respective carrying amounts,
L-1 would
need to determine whether
L-1 goodwill
and long-lived assets would be impaired. Moreover, if economic
conditions continue to deteriorate and capital markets
conditions continue to adversely impact the valuation of
enterprises, the estimated fair values of
L-1
reporting units could be adversely impacted, which could result
in future impairments.
Purchase
price allocations of acquired businesses
Valuations of acquired businesses requires
L-1 to make
significant estimates, which are derived from information
obtained from the management of acquired businesses,
L-1s
business plans for the acquired business or intellectual
property and other sources. Critical assumptions and estimates
used in the initial valuation of goodwill and other intangible
assets include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
Assessments of appropriate valuation methodologies in the
circumstances.
|
|
|
|
Future expected cash flows from product sales, customer
contracts and acquired developed technologies, patents and other
intellectual property.
|
|
|
|
Expected costs to complete any in process research and
development projects and commercialize viable products and
estimated cash flows from sales of such products.
|
|
|
|
The acquired Companies brand awareness and market position.
|
|
|
|
Assumptions about the period of time over which
L-1 will
continue to use the acquired brand and intangible assets.
|
|
|
|
Discount rates.
|
The estimates and assumptions may not materialize because
unanticipated events and circumstances may occur. If estimates
and assumptions used to initially value goodwill and intangible
assets prove to be different from actual results, ongoing
reviews of the carrying values of such goodwill and intangible
assets may indicate impairment, which will require us to record
an impairment charge in the period in which it is identified.
Revenue
Recognition
L-1 revenue
including discontinued operations, is derived primarily from
sales to Federal and State government customers, some of which
are fulfilled through solutions that include the delivery of
consumables, hardware and software components, and related
maintenance, technical support, training and installation, as
well as fingerprinting, technology and security services. When a
customer arrangement does not require significant production,
modification or customization of software, or is otherwise not
within the scope of the standards applicable to long term
contracts revenue is recognized when the following four criteria
are met:
|
|
|
|
|
Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists
L-1 requires
evidence of an agreement with a customer specifying the terms
and conditions of the products or services to be delivered
typically in the form of a signed contract or purchase order.
|
|
|
|
Delivery has occurred For products, delivery
generally takes place when title to the products, which in
certain instances includes hardware and software licenses, are
shipped to or accepted by the customer. For services, delivery
takes place as the services are performed.
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
The fee is fixed or determinable Fees are fixed or
determinable if they are not subject to a refund or cancellation
and do not have payment terms that exceed
L-1 standard
payment terms.
|
|
|
|
Collection is probable
L-1
evaluates all customers with significant transactions to
determine whether collection of the sales price is probable.
|
Transactions which typically do not involve significant
production, modification or customization of software, do not
include services considered to be essential to the functionality
of the software or otherwise are not within the scope of the
standards for long term contracts include:
|
|
|
|
|
Secure credentialing solutions, primarily to Federal and State
government customers.
|
|
|
|
Sale of hardware products and related maintenance and services.
|
|
|
|
Sale of printing system components and consumables including
printers, secure coating, ribbon, film, and other parts,
primarily to Federal government customers.
|
|
|
|
Sale of portable devices that provide iris, face and fingerprint
identification and recognition related maintenance and services.
|
|
|
|
Licenses of
off-the-shelf
versions of fingerprint, face and iris recognition software and
related maintenance and services.
|
|
|
|
Sale of software and software developer kits and related
maintenance and services.
|
|
|
|
Services and software to scan, collect and transmit fingerprints
for identity and background verification.
|
|
|
|
Sale of document authentication products and services, which
typically include sales of hardware, software, maintenance and
support.
|
|
|
|
Information technology and security services provided to the
U.S. intelligence community.
|
Many of L-1
sales arrangements include multiple elements. Such elements may
include one or more of the following: consumables, equipment,
hardware, software, rights to additional software, when and if
available software, hardware maintenance, software maintenance,
hardware repair or replacement, technical support services,
training, installation and consulting services. For
multiple-element arrangements not within the scope of standards
applicable to software revenue recognition standards,
L-1
allocates value to each of the elements based on estimated
relative fair value, if fair value exists for each element of
the arrangement. For arrangements within the scope of standards
applicable to software revenue recognition standards, which do
not involve significant production, modification or
customization of software or otherwise include services that are
considered essential to the functionality of software
L-1
allocates fair value based on vendor specific objective evidence
(VSOE) of fair value, which is determined based on the price
charged when each element is sold separately, considering
renewals and other evidence of fair value, as appropriate. If
fair value or VSOE of fair value, if applicable, exists for all
undelivered elements, but does not exist for the delivered
element, the residual method is used to allocate value to each
element. Under the residual method, each undelivered element is
allocated value based on fair value for that element, and the
remainder of the total arrangement consideration is allocated to
the delivered element. If fair value or VSOE of fair value if
applicable, does not exist for all undelivered elements, revenue
is deferred until evidence of fair value of the undelivered
elements are established, at which time revenue is recognized
for all delivered elements. Revenue of maintenance and support
is recognized ratably over the remaining term of any maintenance
and support period.
For transactions not within the scope of the standards
applicable to revenue recognition for long term contracts or
software sales, revenue is recognized upon transfer of title for
product sales, and performance for services, provided the four
revenue criteria listed above are met at that time.
In certain cases, customer acceptance is required, in which case
revenue is deferred until customer acceptance is obtained unless
acceptance is deemed perfunctory. If the fee due from the
customer is not fixed or determinable, revenue is recognized as
payments become due from the customer. If collection is not
considered probable, revenue is recognized when the fee is
collected. Revenues from security and information
60
technology, training and similar services are typically
recognized as the services are performed. Software maintenance,
hardware maintenance, and technical support for such products,
are typically recognized ratably over the contract term, which
approximates the timing of the services rendered. Revenues
earned pursuant to time and material, fixed price level effort
contracts and cost reimbursable contracts are recognized as the
services are performed. Revenue from the collection of
fingerprints for identity and background verification is
recognized when the fingerprint is transmitted to the applicable
background vetting agency. Expenses on all services are
recognized when the costs are incurred.
L-1
contractual arrangements generally do not provide for a right to
return.
Revenue from consumables, equipment and hardware sales that
require no installation, is recognized in accordance with the
terms of the sale, generally when
L-1 ships
the product, provided no significant obligations remain and
collection is deemed reasonably assured. Certain of
L-1 hardware
sales to end users require installation subsequent to shipment
and transfer of title. Recognition of revenue related to
hardware sales that are contingent on installation is deferred
until installation is complete, title has transferred and
customer acceptance has been obtained. When hardware products
are sold through authorized representatives, dealers,
distributors or other third party sales channels, the obligation
to install the hardware generally does not remain
L-1s
responsibility, but is rather an obligation of the authorized
representative, dealer, distributor or other third party to its
ultimate customer. Consequently, for sales to third party
distributors, revenue is recognized at the time title is
transferred, which is generally upon shipment. On rare
occasions,
L-1 is
required to install
L-1 products
on behalf of
L-1 third
party distributors. In these cases, revenue is recorded in the
same manner as products sold to end users where acceptance of
product by the third party distributor is contingent upon
successful installation of product.
Revenues from software sales and licenses, including software
developer kits are recognized in accordance with standards
applicable to software sales.
L-1
recognizes revenue of software products when persuasive evidence
of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is
fixed or determinable, VSOE of fair value exists to allocate the
total fee to all undelivered elements of the arrangement and
collection fee is deemed probable.
In the event that a multiple element arrangement includes
hardware, software and services and the software is more than
incidental to the arrangement, but not essential to the
functionality of the hardware,
L-1
recognizes revenues on the software and non software elements
pursuant to the respective standard applicable to software and
non software elements.
When multiple-element arrangements include software deliverable
and involves significant production, modification or
customization of the software, or otherwise involves services
that are considered to be essential to the functionality of the
software,
L-1 applies
the accounting standards applicable to long term contracts. When
VSOE of fair value exists for the software maintenance,
technical support or other services in arrangements requiring
contract accounting, revenue for software maintenance, technical
support on other services is recognized as the services are
performed and the rest of the arrangement is accounted for under
accounting standards applicable to long term contracts. When
VSOE of fair value is not available for such services the entire
arrangement is accounted for under accounting standards
applicable to long term contracts and the related revenue is
recognized with the rest of the contract deliverables under the
percentage of completion method.
In general, transactions that involve significant production,
modification or customization of software, or otherwise include
services considered to be essential to the functionality of the
software and which are accounted in accordance with standards
applicable to long-term contracts, include:
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts or elements of contracts for the production of
drivers licenses and other identification credentials that
require the delivery and installation of customized software.
|
|
|
|
Identity solutions contracts, typically providing for the
development, customization and installation of fingerprinting,
face and iris recognition systems for government agencies, law
enforcement agencies and commercial businesses.
|
L-1 also
utilizes contract accounting for certain Federal government
contracts.
61
Revenue from long term contracts is recognized using the
percentage of completion method.
L-1 measures
the percentage of completion using either input measures (e.g.
costs incurred) or output measures (e.g. contract milestones),
whichever provides the most reliable and meaningful measure of
performance in the circumstances. Milestones are specific events
or deliverables clearly identified in the contract and can
include delivering customized systems, installation and
services. When milestone measures are used, revenue is
recognized based on total milestones billable to the customer
less revenue related to future maintenance or services. On
contracts where milestones are not used,
L-1
generally recognizes revenue on a
cost-to-cost
basis or as the units are delivered whichever is most
appropriate in the circumstances. The cumulative impact of any
revision in estimates to complete or recognition of losses on
contracts is reflected in the period in which the changes or
losses become known.
L-1 records
costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings under these
contracts as current assets.
L-1
contracts related to the delivery of drivers licenses and
identification credentials typically provide that the State
departments of motor vehicles, or similar agencies pay a fixed
price per credential produced utilizing equipment and systems
that L-1
owns, designs, implements and supports.
The price includes charges for materials and the data that is
stored on the credentials. Prices for these contracts vary
depending among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
Design and integration complexities.
|
|
|
|
Nature and number of workstations and sites installed.
|
|
|
|
Projected number of credentials to be produced.
|
|
|
|
Size of databases.
|
|
|
|
Cost of consumable materials expected to be used.
|
|
|
|
Level of post-installation involvement.
|
|
|
|
Competitive considerations.
|
Drivers licenses or credentials contracts or contract
elements within such contracts generally require that
L-1 incur
up-front costs related to the software, hardware and other
equipment. The delivery of the licenses or credentials typically
also require us to customize, design, and install equipment and
software at customer locations, as well as perform training,
supply consumables, maintain the equipment and provide support
services. Costs related to the customized software and hardware
used in drivers license contracts are capitalized during
the period in which
L-1 develops
and installs the system and are amortized over the estimated
economic life of the contract beginning when the system goes
into service. Revenue on these contracts is earned based on, and
is contingent upon, the production of licenses or credentials
utilizing the deployed system and is therefore recognized as the
licenses or credentials are produced. If the contractual
arrangement includes the sale of consumables whose title is
transferred to the customer,
L-1
recognizes revenue when title is transferred.
Income
Taxes
L-1 has
recorded net deferred tax assets of $58.4 million at
December 31, 2010. Excluding net deferred tax liabilities
related to discontinued operations, net deferred tax assets
aggregate $74.1 million which include the tax benefits of
net operating loss carryforwards aggregating $67.4 million,
net of a related valuation allowance.
The 2010 results of continuing operations reflect an income tax
benefit of $20.2 million, primarily related to an increase
in deferred tax assets resulting from current year temporary
differences, as well as a net reduction in the valuation
allowance resulting from the estimated utilization of net
operating loss carryforwards.
Management evaluated the adequacy of the valuation allowance in
light of the results for the year, based on the cumulative
results of operations for the three years ended
December 31, 2010, after considering items
62
that do not enter in the determination of taxable income, and
the likely future operating results. The evaluation indicated
the recorded valuation allowance for deferred tax assets related
to net operating loss carry forwards should be reduced.
Management evaluates the adequacy of the valuation allowance
annually and, if its assessment of whether it is more likely
than not that the related tax benefits will be realized, changes
the valuation allowance will be increased or reduced with a
corresponding benefit or charge included in income. At
December 31, 2010, the Company had U.S. Federal net
operating loss carryforwards of $447.2 million, which may
be used to reduce future taxable income. In addition, the
Company has $145.2 million of deductible goodwill, of which
$46.4 million relates to continuing operations.
Utilization of net operating loss carryforwards is dependent on
generating future taxable income of the appropriate type and in
the appropriate jurisdiction. In addition, substantially all of
the net operating loss carryforwards are subject to limitations
imposed by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code or
similar foreign limitations. The determination of the limitation
is complex and requires significant judgment and analyses of
past transactions. For Federal income tax purposes, the Identix
merger has been accounted for as an acquisition of the Company
by Identix, accordingly,
L-1s
net operating loss carryforwards are also subject to limitations
imposed by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. In
addition, the net operating carryforwards of Digimarc,
Bioscrypt, Iridian, SecuriMetrics and ComnetiX, as well as other
previously acquired companies of both Identix and
L-1, are
subject to separate limitations imposed by Section 382.
L-1 has
analyzed the limitations and recorded a deferred tax asset only
for those net operating losses that are realizable within the
carry forward period.
Uncertain tax positions are recognized if the Company determines
that it is more likely than not that a tax position will be
sustained based on the technical merits of the position, on the
presumption that the position will be examined by the
appropriate taxing authority that would have full knowledge of
all relevant information. The tax position is measured at the
largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent
likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
L-1 does not
believe it has significant uncertain tax positions.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Stock-based compensation is recognized over the vesting period
for new awards granted and for unvested awards outstanding.
Stock-based compensation is recognized based on the fair value
of the date of grant for stock options and the market value of
the shares for restricted stock awards.
Determining the appropriate fair value model for valuing stock
options and related assumptions requires judgment, including
estimating common stock price volatility, forfeiture rates and
expected terms. The following weighted average assumptions were
utilized in the valuation of stock option awards for 2010 and
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Expected common stock price volatility
|
|
|
56.2%
|
|
|
|
59.3%
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
3.3%
|
|
|
|
3.9%
|
|
Expected life of options
|
|
|
6.3 Years
|
|
|
|
6.3 Years
|
|
Expected annual dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The expected volatility rate is based on the historical
volatility of the Companys common stock. During 2007, the
Company reviewed the historical volatility of its common stock
and began using a weighted average method that more accurately
reflects volatility. The expected life of options is based on
the average life of 6.3 years. The Company estimated
forfeitures when recognizing compensation expense based on
historical rates. The risk free interest rate is based on the
7 year treasury security as it approximates the estimated
6.3 years expected life of the options. The Company updates
these assumptions on at least an annual basis and on an interim
basis if significant changes to the assumptions are warranted.
63
Contingencies
and Litigation
In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to
litigation, investigations, proceedings, claims or assessments
and various contingent liabilities incidental to its businesses
or assumed in connection with business acquisitions. The Company
records a liability for contingencies when management believes
that it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and
can reasonably estimate the amount of the potential loss. The
Company believes it has adequate provisions for any such
matters. The Company reviews these provisions quarterly and
adjusts these provisions to reflect the impact of negotiations,
settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel and other
information and events pertaining to a particular matter.
Because of the inherent uncertainties of litigation the ultimate
outcome cannot be accurately predicted. It is therefore possible
that the consolidated financial position, results of operations
or cash flows of the Company could be materially adversely
affected in any particular period by the unfavorable resolution
of one or more of these matters and contingencies.
Adoption
of New Accounting Standards
In January 2010, the FASB issued the standard, Fair
Value Measurements and Disclosures Improving
Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. The
adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the
financial statements for any of the periods presented.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In October 2009, the FASB issued the standard, Multiple
Element Arrangements, which modifies accounting for
multiple element arrangements by requiring that the separation
of the arrangements be based on estimated selling prices based
on entity specific assumptions rather than fair value,
eliminating the residual method of allocation and requiring
additional disclosures related to such arrangements. The
standard is effective prospectively for arrangements entered
into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or
after June 15, 2010. The Company has not yet evaluated the
impact the adoption of the standard will have on its
consolidated financial statements.
Also in October 2009, the FASB issued the standard,
Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software
Elements, which amends software revenue recognition
guidance to eliminate from its scope tangible products
containing software components that function together to deliver
the tangible products essential functionality and to
provide guidance on how to allocate arrangement consideration to
deliverables in an arrangement that contain both tangible
products and software. The standard is effective prospectively
for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in
fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The
Company has not yet evaluated the impact the adoption of the
standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.
64
Quarterly
Financial Data (Unaudited)
The following table sets forth selected quarterly financial data
for 2010 and 2009 (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
94,627
|
|
|
$
|
107,970
|
|
|
$
|
121,012
|
|
|
$
|
126,519
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
24,306
|
|
|
|
30,287
|
|
|
|
37,379
|
|
|
|
28,451
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(5,422
|
)
|
|
|
(2,966
|
)
|
|
|
(6,570
|
)
|
|
|
4,944
|
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(2,081
|
)
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
(2,605
|
)
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
Net income (loss) applicable to
L-1 shareholders
|
|
|
(7,523
|
)
|
|
|
(2,740
|
)
|
|
|
(9,166
|
)
|
|
|
2,943
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
Applicable to
L-1 shareholders
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
Applicable to
L-1 shareholders
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
97,213
|
|
|
$
|
113,690
|
|
|
$
|
119,233
|
|
|
$
|
106,993
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
27,749
|
|
|
|
33,275
|
|
|
|
39,493
|
|
|
|
27,029
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(2,965
|
)
|
|
|
(1,025
|
)
|
|
|
3,039
|
|
|
|
(164
|
)
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(816
|
)
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
|
|
(1,667
|
)
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
Net income (loss) applicable to
L-1 shareholders
|
|
|
(3,781
|
)
|
|
|
(1,249
|
)
|
|
|
1,372
|
|
|
|
(540
|
)
|
Basic net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
Applicable to
L-1 shareholders
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
Applicable to
L-1 shareholders
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
|
Interest
Rate Risk
L-1 is
exposed to interest rate risk related to borrowings under
L-1s
Credit Agreement. At December 31, 2010, borrowings
outstanding under the Credit Agreement aggregated
$317.9 million, bearing interest at variable rates. At
December 31, 2010, the market value of the Term Loan was
approximately $260.3 million and the carrying amount was
$257.9 million. The Company is exposed to risks resulting
from increases in interest rates and benefits from decreasing
interest rates subject to floors as described in the Credit
Agreement. After giving effect to the repayment of
$289.3 million of debt with the proceeds of the BAE sale, a
change in the interest rate of 1 percent would increase or
decrease interest expense by $0.4 million. The Company has
partially mitigated this interest rate risk by entering into
interest rate protection agreements with an aggregate notional
amount of $162.5 million pursuant to which it receives
variable interest based on three month LIBOR, subject to a floor
of 3.0 percent with respect to $62.5 million notional
amount and pays a fixed interest rate.
65
L-1s
Convertible Notes bear interest at a fixed rate and mature on
May 15, 2027, but can be redeemed by us or called by the
holders in May 2012 and are convertible into shares of
L-1 common
stock at an initial conversion price of $32.00
(31.25 shares per $1,000 principal amount) in the following
circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
If during any five consecutive trading day period the trading
day period the trading price is less than 98 percent of the
product of the last reported sales price multiplied by the
applicable conversion rate.
|
|
|
|
After December 31, 2010, if the sale price of
L-1 common
stock for twenty or more trading days exceeds 130 percent
of the initial conversion price.
|
|
|
|
If the Company calls the Convertible Notes for redemption or
upon certain specified transactions.
|
The market value of the Convertible Notes is impacted by changes
in interest rates and changes in the market value of
L-1 common
stock. At December 31, 2010, the estimated market value of
the Convertible Notes was approximately $172.9 million and
the carrying amount was $166.6 million.
For additional information regarding debt and financial
instruments see Notes 3 and 5 to
L-1
consolidated financial statements.
Foreign
Currency Exposures
The transactions of
L-1
international operations, primarily
L-1 German,
Canadian, Mexican and Indian subsidiaries, are denominated in
Euros, Canadian Dollars, Indian Rupees and Mexican Pesos,
respectively. Financial assets and liabilities denominated in
foreign currencies consist primarily of accounts receivable and
accounts payable and accrued expenses. At December 31,
2010, financial assets and liabilities denominated in Euros
aggregate $0.9 million and $0.5 million, respectively,
and at December 31, 2009 aggregated $2.0 million and
$0.7 million, respectively. At December 31, 2010,
financial assets and liabilities denominated in Canadian Dollars
aggregated $2.3 million and $2.1 million,
respectively, and at December 31, 2009 aggregated
$4.7 million and $2.2 million, respectively. At
December 31, 2010, financial assets and liabilities
denominated in Indian Rupees aggregated $7.1 million and
less than $0.1 million, respectively. At December 31,
2010, financial assets and liabilities denominated in Mexican
Pesos were $1.4 million and $0.6 million and at
December 31, 2009 aggregated $1.0 million and
$0.4 million, respectively.
Hardware and consumables purchases related to contracts
associated with the U.S. Department of State are
denominated in Japanese Yen and the Companys costs and
operations are exposed to changes in the value of the Yen since
the related revenues are fixed in U.S. dollars. At
December 31, 2010 and at December 31, 2009 these
Japanese Yen denominated liabilities aggregated
$2.9 million and $1.8 million, respectively. The
Company utilized foreign currency forward contracts to settle
obligations denominated in Japanese Yen. All gains and losses
resulting from the change in fair value of the currency forward
contracts are recorded in operations and are offset by
unrealized gains and losses related to recorded liabilities.
None of the contracts were terminated prior to settlement. As of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company had committed to
foreign currency forward contracts that substantially mitigate
all foreign currency exposures for the liabilities denominated
in Yen. The fair value of these contracts at December 31,
2010 and 2009, was an unrealized loss of less than
$0.1 million for both periods.
L-1
international operations and transactions are subject to risks
typical of international operations, including, but not limited
to, differing economic conditions, changes in political climate,
differing tax structures, other regulations and restrictions and
foreign currency exchange rate volatility. Accordingly,
L-1s
future results could be materially impacted by changes in these
or other factors.
L-1s
principal exposure is related to subsidiaries whose costs and
assets and liabilities denominated in Euros, Japanese Yen,
Canadian Dollars, Mexican Pesos and Indian Rupees. As of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, the cumulative effect from
foreign currency translation adjustments related to foreign
operations was approximately gains of $0.7 million and
$1.2 million, respectively.
66
Prepaid
Forward Contract
L-1 entered
into a pre-paid forward contract with Bear Stearns (now JP
Morgan Chase) to purchase approximately 3.5 million shares
of L-1
common stock at a price of $20.00 per share for delivery in May
2012. On January 26, 2011, the Company entered in a
termination agreement pursuant to which the JP Morgan Chase
delivered 3.5 million shares to the Company.
Forward-Looking
Statements
This annual report on
Form 10-K
contains or incorporates forward-looking statements within the
meaning of section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and
section 21e of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These
forward-looking statements are managements beliefs and
assumptions. In addition, other written or oral statements that
constitute forward-looking statements are based on current
expectation, estimates, and projections about the industry and
markets in which
L-1 operates
and statements may be made by or on
L-1s
behalf. Words such as should, could,
may, expect, anticipate,
intend, plan, believe,
seek, estimate, variations of such words
and similar expressions are intended to identify such
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are
not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks,
uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict.
L-1 has
included important factors in under the heading Risk
Factors that
L-1 believes
could cause
L-1s
actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking
statements
L-1 makes.
L-1 does not
intend to update publicly any forward-looking statements whether
as a result of new information or otherwise.
L-1 does not
maintain any off-balance sheet arrangements, transactions,
obligations or other relationships with unconsolidated entities
that would be expected to have a material current or future
effect upon
L-1s
financial condition or results of operations.
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
The Companys financial statements are included in
pages F-1 to F-46 of this annual report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting And
Financial
Disclosure
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and
procedures. L-1
has established and maintained disclosure controls and
procedures that are designed to ensure that material information
relating to the Company and
L-1
subsidiaries required to be disclosed by us in
L-1 reports
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and
forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated
to L-1
management, including the Companys Chief Executive
Officer, or CEO, and Chief Financial Officer, or CFO, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls
and procedures, management recognized that any controls and
procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can
provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired
control objectives, as
L-1 is
designed to do, and management necessarily was required to apply
its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of
possible controls and procedures.
In connection with the preparation of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation
of L-1
management, including the CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of
the design and operation of
L-1
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(e)
under the Exchange Act) was performed as of December 31,
2010. Based on this evaluation,
L-1s
CEO and CFO concluded that
L-1s
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
December 31, 2010.
(b) Managements annual report on internal
control over financial reporting.
67
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal
control over financial reporting is defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
Companys principal executive and financial officers and
effected by the Companys Board of Directors, management
and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. All internal control systems, no matter how well
designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even systems
determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance
with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation
and the prevention and detection of misstatements. Projections
of any evaluations of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to risks that controls may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with
policies or procedures may deteriorate.
L-1 has
designed its internal control over financial reporting to
provide reasonable assurance that controls will achieve their
objectives. However, any system of internal control over
financial reporting, no matter how well conceived and operated,
can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance its
objectives are met. Further, the design of an internal control
system must include as assessment of the costs and related risks
associated with the control and the purpose for which it was
intended. Because of the inherent limitations in all internal
control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute
assurance that all internal control deficiencies, including
instances of fraud and control breakdowns, will not occur
because of human error or mistakes. Additionally, controls can
be circumvented by the individual acts by collusion of two or
more people, or by management override of the controls. The
design of any system of controls also is based in part upon
certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and
there can be no assurance that a design will succeed in
achieving its stated goals under all potential future
conditions. Over time,
L-1 control
systems may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or the degree of compliance with the policies of procedures may
deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a
cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or
fraud may occur and not be detected and could be material.
Management, with the participation of the Companys
principal executive and financial officers, has assessed the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2010 pursuant to
rules 13a-15(c)
and
15d-15(c)
under the Securities Exchange act of 1934, as amended. In making
its assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations, or COSO, of the Treadway
Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework.
Based on such assessment, Management believes that, as of
December 31, 2010, the Companys internal control over
financial reporting was effective.
The Companys independent registered public accounting
firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP has issued a report dated
February 28, 2011 on the Companys internal control
over financial reporting.
(c) Changes in internal controls.
Based on managements evaluation of changes in internal
controls over financial reporting pursuant to
rules 13a-15(d)
and
15d-15(d)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
management believes that there have been no changes materially
affecting or reasonably likely to materially affect internal
control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended
December 31, 2010.
The certification of
L-1s
principal executive officer and principal financial officer
required in accordance with
Rule 13a-14(a)
under the Exchange Act are attached as exhibits to this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K.
The disclosures set forth in this Item 9A contain
information concerning the evaluation of
L-1s
disclosure controls and procedures, and changes in
L-1s
internal control over financial reporting, referred to in
paragraph 4 of those certifications. The certifications
should be read in conjunction with this Item 9A for a more
complete understanding of the matters covered by the
certifications.
68
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
L-1 Identity
Solutions, Inc.
Stamford, Connecticut
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of
L-1 Identity
Solutions, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of
December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. The Companys management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the Companys internal control over financial
reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based
upon assessed risk and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A Companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
Companys principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
by the Companys board of directors, management, and other
personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A Companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management
and directors of the Company; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
Companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over
financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting
to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2010, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2010 of the Company and our report dated
February 28, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on those
financial statements.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Stamford, Connecticut
February 28, 2011
69
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
None
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors
and Executive Officers of the Registrant
|
Information required to be included in this item is incorporated
by reference from
L-1s
definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to
Regulation 14A.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
Information required to be included in this item is incorporated
by reference from
L-1s
definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to
Regulation 14A.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
Information required to be included in this item is incorporated
by reference from
L-1s
definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to
Regulation 14A.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions
|
Information required to be included in this item is incorporated
by reference from
L-1s
definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to
Regulation 14A.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
Information to be included in this item is incorporated by
reference from
L-1s
definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to
Regulation 14A.
70
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits and
Financial Statement Schedules
|
(a), (c) Financial Statements and Schedules
For a list of financial statements included herein see Index on
page F-1.
All schedules are omitted because they are either not applicable
or not required, or because the required information is shown
either in the consolidated financial statements or in the notes
thereto.
See Exhibit Index on pages 73 through 76.
71
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized on the 1st day of March, 2011.
L-1 IDENTITY
SOLUTIONS, INC.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Robert
V. LaPenta
|
Robert V. LaPenta
Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated, on
the 1st day of March, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert
V. LaPenta
Robert
V. LaPenta
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ James
A. DePalma
James
A. DePalma
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ Vincent
A. DAngelo
Vincent
A. DAngelo
|
|
Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ B.G.
Beck
B.G.
Beck
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Milton
E. Cooper
Milton
E. Cooper
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert
S. Gelbard
Robert
S. Gelbard
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Malcolm
J. Gudis
Malcolm
J. Gudis
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
E. Lawler
John
E. Lawler
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Admiral
James M. Loy
Admiral
James M. Loy
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Peter
Nessen
Peter
Nessen
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Harriet
Mouchly-Weiss
Harriet
Mouchly-Weiss
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ B.
Boykin Rose
B.
Boykin Rose
|
|
Director
|
72
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
2.1
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated May 16, 2007,
by and among L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc., L-1 Identity
Solutions Operating Company and L-1 Merger Co. (filed as
Exhibit 2.1 to L-1s Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 16, 2007).*
|
2.2
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 18, 2007, by
and among McClendon LLC, the selling stockholders, L-1 Identity
Solutions, Inc., L-1 Identity Solutions Operating Company and
Patty Hardt, as the selling stockholders representative
(filed as Exhibit 2.1 to L-1s Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on June 20, 2007).*
|
2.3
|
|
Arrangement Agreement, dated as of January 5, 2008, by and
among L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc., L-1 Identity Solutions
Operating Company, 6897525 Canada Inc. and Bioscrypt Inc. (filed
as Exhibit 2.1 to L-1s Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on January 10, 2008).*
|
2.4
|
|
Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
June 29, 2008, by and among L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc.,
Dolomite Acquisition Co. and Digimarc Corporation (filed as
Exhibit 2.1 to L-1s Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 3, 2008).*
|
2.4(a)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Agreement and
Plan of Merger, dated July 17, 2008, by and among L-1
Identity Solutions, Inc., Dolomite Acquisition Co. and Digimarc
Corporation (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to L-1s Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 17, 2008).*
|
2.5
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 19,
2010, by and among
L-1 Identity
Solutions, Inc., Safran SA and Laser Acquisition Sub Inc. (filed
as Exhibit 2.1 to L-1s Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 21, 2010).*
|
2.6
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 19, 2010, by and
between L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc. and BAE Systems Information
Solutions Inc. (filed as Exhibit 2.2 to L-1s Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 21, 2010).*
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation as filed with
the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on May 16,
2007 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to L-1s Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 16, 2007).*
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to
L-1s Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on November 5, 2007).*
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen Certificates for Common Stock (filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to L-1s Registration Statement on
Form 8-A
filed on August 29, 2006).*
|
4.2
|
|
Indenture relating to Convertible Senior Notes due 2027, dated
as May 17, 2007, by and between L-1 Identity Solutions,
Inc. and The Bank of New York, as trustee (including the form of
3.75 percent Convertible Senior Notes due 2027) (filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to L-1s Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 23, 2007).*
|
4.3
|
|
Warrant, dated as of March 9, 2004, issued by Identix
Incorporated in favor of Delean Vision Worldwide, Inc. (filed as
Exhibit 4.2 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-3
filed by Identix Incorporated on March 25, 2004).*
|
10.1
|
|
Amended and Restated License Agreement, dated as of
August 20, 1996, between Viisage Technology, Inc. and Lau
Technologies (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Amendment No. 1
to
L-1s
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
filed on October 9, 1996) (SEC File
No. 333-10649).*
|
10.2
|
|
Investment Agreement, dated as of October 5, 2005, between
Viisage Technology, Inc. and L-1 Investment Partners, LLC (filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to L-1s Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on October 11, 2005).*
|
10.3
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated December 16, 2005, by
and among Viisage Technology, Inc., L-1 Investment Partners LLC
and Aston Capital Partners, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to
the Schedule 13D filed by Aston Capital Partners, L.P. on
December 23, 2005).*
|
10.4
|
|
Consulting Agreement, dated August 29, 2006, between L-1
Investment Partners LLC and Viisage Technology, Inc. (filed as
Exhibit 10.07 to L-1s Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 6, 2006).*
|
73
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
10.5
|
|
Termination and Non-Competition Agreement, dated August 29,
2006, between L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc. and L-1 Investment
Partners LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.08 to L-1s Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 6, 2006).*
|
10.6
|
|
Sublease Agreement, dated August 29, 2006, between L-1
Investment Partners LLC and Viisage Technology, Inc. (filed as
Exhibit 10.09 to L-1s Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 6, 2006).*
|
10.7
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2007, by and
among Advanced Concepts, Inc., John Register and Frank White,
L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc., and John Register, in his capacity
as the sellers representative (filed as Exhibit 2.1
to L-1s Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 2, 2007).*
|
10.8
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2007, by and among
L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc., L-1 Identity Solutions Operating
Company and Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc and Banc of
America Securities LLC, as representatives of the initial
purchasers (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to
L-1s
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 23, 2007).*
|
10.9
|
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated as of May 16,
2007, by and between L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc. and L-1
Identity Solutions Operating Company (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 16, 2007).*
|
10.10
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of May 17, 2007, by
and among L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc. and Bear,
Stearns & Co. Inc. and Banc of America Securities LLC,
as representatives of the initial purchasers (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.3 to L-1s Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 23, 2007).*
|
10.11
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2008,
by and between L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc. and Robert V.
LaPenta (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to L-1s Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on August 4, 2008).*
|
10.12
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2008,
by and between L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc. and Iridian Asset
Management LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to L-1s
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on August 4, 2008).*
|
10.13
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2008,
by and between L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc. and LRSR LLC (filed
as Exhibit 10.2 to L-1s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on August 4, 2008).*
|
10.13(a)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Securities Purchase Agreement, dated
as of August 4, 2008, by and between L-1 Identity
Solutions, Inc. and LRSR LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.2(a) to
L-1s Registration Statement on
Form S-3
filed on August 5, 2008).*
|
10.14
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2008,
by and between L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc. and Robert V.
LaPenta (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Statement on
Schedule 13-D/A
filed by Aston Capital Partners, L.P. and others on July 3,
2008).*
|
10.15
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2008,
by and between L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc. and Iridian Asset
Management LLC (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to L-1s
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on August 4, 2008).*
|
10.16
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of August 5, 2008,
by and among
L-1 Identity
Solutions, Inc. and MHR Capital Partners Master Account LP, MHR
Capital Partners (100) LP and MHR Institutional
Partners III LP (filed as Exhibit 4.15 to L-1s
Registration Statement on
Form S-3
filed on August 5, 2008).*
|
10.17
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of February 17,
2006, by and between Viisage Technology, Inc. and the former
stockholders of SecuriMetrics, Inc. named therein (filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to L-1s Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 24, 2006).*
|
10.18
|
|
Viisage Technology, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 1996
Management Stock Option Plan (included as Appendix B to
L-1s Schedule 14A filed on April 16,
2004).*
|
10.18(a)
|
|
Form of Option Agreement for the Viisage Technology, Inc. 1996
Management Stock Option Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to
Amendment No. 1 to L-1s Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(SEC File
No. 333-10649)
filed on October 9, 1996).*
|
74
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
10.19
|
|
Viisage Technology, Inc. Amended and Restated 1996 Director
Stock Option Plan (included as Appendix C to L-1s
Schedule 14A filed on April 16, 2004).*
|
10.19(a)
|
|
Form of Option Agreement for the Viisage Technology, Inc.
1996 Director Stock Option Plan (filed as
Exhibit 10.11 to Amendment No. 1 to L-1s
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
filed on October 9, 1996) (SEC File
No. 333-10649).*
|
10.20
|
|
Amended and Restated Viisage Technology, Inc. 2001 Stock in Lieu
of Cash Compensation for Directors Plan (filed as
Exhibit 10.42 to L-1s Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001) (SEC File
No. 000-21559).*
|
10.21
|
|
L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc. 2005 Long Term Incentive Plan
(included as Appendix B to L-1s Schedule 14A
filed on September 7, 2005).*
|
10.21(a)
|
|
Form of Grant Agreement under the L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc.
2005 Long Term Incentive Plan.(filed as Exhibit 10.12(a) to
L-1s Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, filed on
February 28, 2008).*
|
10.22
|
|
L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc. 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan
(included as Appendix A to L-1s Schedule 14A
filed on March 14, 2008).*
|
10.22(a)
|
|
Form of L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc. 2008 Long-Term Incentive
Plan Option Award Grant Agreement (filed as Exhibit 99.2 to
L-1s Registration Statement on
Form S-8
filed on May 30, 2008).*
|
10.23
|
|
Bioscrypt Inc. Primary Stock Option Plan (filed as
Exhibit 99.1 to L-1s Registration Statement on
Form S-8
filed on March 5, 2008).*
|
10.24
|
|
Bioscrypt Inc. A4Vision Plan (filed as Exhibit 99.2 to
L-1s Registration Statement on
Form S-8
filed on March 5, 2008).*
|
10.25
|
|
Identix Incorporated 2002 Equity Incentive Plan (filed as
Exhibit 99.3 to L-1s Registration Statement on
Form S-8
filed on August 30, 2006).*
|
10.25(a)
|
|
Form of Grant Agreement under the Identix Incorporated 2002
Equity Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.22(a) to
L-1s Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, filed on
February 28, 2008).*
|
10.26
|
|
Identix Incorporated New Employee Stock Incentive Plan (filed as
Exhibit 99.4 to L-1s Registration Statement on
Form S-8
filed on August 30, 2006).*
|
10.27
|
|
Identix Incorporated Non-employee Directors Stock Option Plan
(filed as Exhibit 99.5 to L-1s Registration Statement
on
Form S-8
filed on August 30, 2006).*
|
10.28
|
|
Identix Incorporated Equity Incentive Plan (filed as
Exhibit 99.6 to L-1s Registration Statement on
Form S-8
filed on August 30, 2006).*
|
10.29
|
|
Visionics Corporation 1990 Stock Option Plan (filed as
Exhibit 99.7 to L-1s Registration Statement on
Form S-8
filed on August 30, 2006).*
|
10.30
|
|
Visionics Corporation 1998 Stock Option Plan (filed as
Exhibit 99.8 to L-1s Registration Statement on
Form S-8
filed on August 30, 2006).*
|
10.31
|
|
Visionics Corporation Stock Incentive Plan (filed as
Exhibit 99.9 to L-1s Registration Statement on
Form S-8
filed on August 30, 2006).*
|
10.32
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated August 29, 2006, between
Viisage Technology, Inc. and Robert V. LaPenta (filed as
Exhibit 10.01 to L-1s Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 6, 2006).*
|
10.32(a)
|
|
Amendment to LaPenta Employment Agreement dated as of
July 31, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to L-1s
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on August 5, 2009).*
|
10.33
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated August 29, 2006, between
Viisage Technology, Inc. and James DePalma (filed as
Exhibit 10.02 to L-1s Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 6, 2006).*
|
10.33(a)
|
|
Amendment to DePalma Employment Agreement dated as of
July 31, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to L-1s
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on August 5, 2009).*
|
75
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
10.34
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated August 29, 2006, between
Viisage Technology, Inc. and Joseph Paresi (filed as
Exhibit 10.03 to L-1s Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 6, 2006).*
|
10.34(a)
|
|
Amendment to Paresi Employment Agreement dated as of
July 31, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to L-1s
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on August 5, 2009).*
|
10.35
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated August 29, 2006, between
Viisage Technology, Inc. and Mark S. Molina (filed as
Exhibit 10.04 to L-1s Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 6, 2006).*
|
10.35(a)
|
|
Amendment to Molina Employment Agreement dated as of
July 31, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to L-1s
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on August 5, 2009).*
|
10.36
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated Sept 21, 2006, between L-1 Identity
Solutions, Inc. and Vincent DAngelo. (filed as
Exhibit 10.33 to L-1s Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, filed on
February 28, 2008).*
|
10.37
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated December 19, 2006, between L-1
Identity Solutions, Inc. and Dr. Joseph J. Atick (filed as
Exhibit 10.01 to L-1s Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on December 22, 2006).*
|
10.37(a)
|
|
Amendment to Dr. Atick Employment Agreement dated as of
July 31, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to L-1s
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on August 5, 2009).*
|
10.38
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated January 31, 2007, between L-1
Identity Solutions, Inc. and Doni Fordyce (filed as
Exhibit 10.01 to L-1s Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on January 9, 2007).*
|
10.38(a)
|
|
Amendment to Fordyce Employment Agreement dated as of
July 31, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to L-1s
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on August 5, 2009).*
|
10.39
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.10
to L-1s Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 6, 2006).*
|
10.40
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of
August 5, 2008, among L-1 Identity Solutions Operating
Company, L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc., Bank of America, N.A.,
Wachovia Bank, National Association, Banc of America Securities
LLC and Wachovia Capital Markets LLC. (filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to L-1s Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on August 8, 2008)(the Credit Agreement)*
|
10.40(a)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Credit Agreement (filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to
L-1s
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 14, 2009)*
|
10.40(b)
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Credit Agreement (filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to
L-1s
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010, filed on
May 5, 2010)*
|
10.40(c)
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to the Credit Agreement (filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to
L-1s
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on August 31, 2010)*
|
10.41
|
|
Voting and Support Agreement, dated as of September 19,
2010, by and among Safran SA, Laser Acquisition Sub Inc., Robert
V. LaPenta and Aston Capital Partners L.P. (filed as
Exhibit 2.1 to L-1s Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 21, 2010)
|
21.1
|
|
List of Subsidiaries.
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm.
|
31.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14
and 15d-14 of the Chief Executive Officer.
|
31.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14
and 15d-14 of the Chief Financial Officer.
|
32.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 of
the Chief Executive Officer.
|
32.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 of
the Chief Financial Officer.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
Exhibit is a management contract or compensatory plan or
arrangement. |
76
INDEX TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity and Comprehensive
Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009
and 2008
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
F-1
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc.
Stamford, Connecticut
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
Company) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of L-1
Identity Solutions, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2010, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission and our report dated February 28, 2011 expressed
an unqualified opinion on the Companys internal control
over financial reporting.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Stamford, Connecticut
February 28, 2011
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
$
|
117,810
|
|
|
$
|
113,445
|
|
|
$
|
77,428
|
|
Solutions
|
|
|
332,318
|
|
|
|
323,684
|
|
|
|
280,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
450,128
|
|
|
|
437,129
|
|
|
|
358,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
107,086
|
|
|
|
102,716
|
|
|
|
66,351
|
|
Solutions
|
|
|
217,390
|
|
|
|
201,518
|
|
|
|
163,184
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
|
|
|
5,229
|
|
|
|
5,349
|
|
|
|
21,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
329,705
|
|
|
|
309,583
|
|
|
|
251,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
120,423
|
|
|
|
127,546
|
|
|
|
107,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
37,193
|
|
|
|
38,651
|
|
|
|
36,425
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
22,309
|
|
|
|
20,730
|
|
|
|
25,244
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
59,567
|
|
|
|
54,953
|
|
|
|
49,185
|
|
Asset impairments and acquisition related expenses
|
|
|
3,150
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
529,683
|
|
Strategic alternative transactions costs and other
|
|
|
11,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
133,289
|
|
|
|
114,996
|
|
|
|
641,437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(12,866
|
)
|
|
|
12,550
|
|
|
|
(534,397
|
)
|
Financing costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual interest
|
|
|
(9,686
|
)
|
|
|
(7,809
|
)
|
|
|
(7,300
|
)
|
Other financing costs
|
|
|
(7,339
|
)
|
|
|
(6,857
|
)
|
|
|
(5,981
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
(324
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes and discontinued operations
|
|
|
(30,229
|
)
|
|
|
(2,440
|
)
|
|
|
(547,666
|
)
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
|
|
|
20,215
|
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
|
|
(7,643
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(10,014
|
)
|
|
|
(1,115
|
)
|
|
|
(555,309
|
)
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income
taxes
|
|
|
(6,451
|
)
|
|
|
(2,888
|
)
|
|
|
3,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(16,465
|
)
|
|
|
(4,003
|
)
|
|
|
(551,594
|
)
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(195
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to L-1 shareholders
|
|
$
|
(16,486
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,198
|
)
|
|
$
|
(551,594
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7.16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to L-1s shareholders
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7.12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted
|
|
|
87,756
|
|
|
|
85,516
|
|
|
|
77,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31.
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
3,085
|
|
|
$
|
6,624
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
103,091
|
|
|
|
116,353
|
|
Inventory, net
|
|
|
32,672
|
|
|
|
29,384
|
|
Deferred tax asset, net
|
|
|
40,881
|
|
|
|
11,514
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
6,536
|
|
|
|
9,249
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
271,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
457,555
|
|
|
|
173,124
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
126,184
|
|
|
|
115,500
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
700,331
|
|
|
|
889,814
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
61,266
|
|
|
|
102,375
|
|
Deferred tax assets, net
|
|
|
33,235
|
|
|
|
26,733
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
14,285
|
|
|
|
16,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,392,856
|
|
|
$
|
1,323,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
90,567
|
|
|
$
|
110,089
|
|
Current portion of deferred revenue
|
|
|
18,559
|
|
|
|
19,890
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
271,401
|
|
|
|
27,062
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
7,503
|
|
|
|
6,680
|
|
Liabilities related to assets held for sale
|
|
|
42,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
430,154
|
|
|
|
163,721
|
|
Deferred revenue, net of current portion
|
|
|
5,472
|
|
|
|
6,676
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities
|
|
|
212,062
|
|
|
|
419,304
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
4,837
|
|
|
|
3,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
652,525
|
|
|
|
593,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 125,000,000 shares
authorized; 94,012,584 and 91,745,135 shares issued at
December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,459,814
|
|
|
|
1,432,898
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(643,935
|
)
|
|
|
(627,449
|
)
|
Pre-paid forward contract
|
|
|
(69,808
|
)
|
|
|
(69,808
|
)
|
Treasury stock, 384,690 and 368,843 shares of common stock,
at cost at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively
|
|
|
(6,316
|
)
|
|
|
(6,173
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
482
|
|
|
|
622
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
740,331
|
|
|
|
730,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
1,392,856
|
|
|
$
|
1,323,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract To
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Controlling
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
76
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,233,731
|
|
|
$
|
(71,657
|
)
|
|
$
|
(69,808
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,407
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,098,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of employee stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock and stock options issued for acquisition of
Bioscrypt
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued to investors
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock issued to investor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for directors fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued under employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options issued for officers bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax charge for stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(331
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(331
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement plan contributions settled in common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants issued & exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,161
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,161
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,582
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,582
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,582
|
)
|
Unrealized loss of financial instruments, net of tax, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,082
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,082
|
)
|
|
|
(1,082
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(551,594
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(551,594
|
)
|
|
|
(551,594
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(559,258
|
)
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
15,107
|
|
|
|
1,393,763
|
|
|
|
(623,251
|
)
|
|
|
(69,808
|
)
|
|
|
(6,161
|
)
|
|
|
(1,257
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
708,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of employee stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for directors fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued under employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax charge for stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(845
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(845
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement plan contributions settled in common stock
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,941
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of Series A convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(15,107
|
)
|
|
|
15,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,391
|
|
|
$
|
1,391
|
|
Unrealized gain of financial instruments, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,198
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
(4,003
|
)
|
|
|
(4,003
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,124
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(193
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,432,898
|
|
|
|
(627,449
|
)
|
|
|
(69,808
|
)
|
|
|
(6,173
|
)
|
|
|
622
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
730,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of employee stock options & warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for directors fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued under employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax charge for stock awards exercised and vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,044
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,044
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement plan contributions settled in common stock
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,036
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(476
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(476
|
)
|
|
$
|
(476
|
)
|
Unrealized gain of financial instruments, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,486
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(16,465
|
)
|
|
|
(16,465
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(16,617
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
|
|
(431
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,459,814
|
|
|
$
|
(643,935
|
)
|
|
$
|
(69,808
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,316
|
)
|
|
$
|
482
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
740,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-5
L-1
IDENTITY SOLUTIONS, INC.
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cash Flow from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(16,465
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,003
|
)
|
|
$
|
(551,594
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
41,688
|
|
|
|
37,129
|
|
|
|
49,412
|
|
Stock-based compensation costs
|
|
|
25,640
|
|
|
|
23,665
|
|
|
|
18,064
|
|
Asset impairments
|
|
|
3,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
528,577
|
|
(Benefit) provision for non-cash income taxes
|
|
|
(21,836
|
)
|
|
|
(2,764
|
)
|
|
|
7,548
|
|
Tax effect of stock option exercises
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
(651
|
)
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount
|
|
|
11,814
|
|
|
|
12,145
|
|
|
|
8,726
|
|
Other non cash items
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
349
|
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of
acquisitions and dispositions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(29,120
|
)
|
|
|
(9,980
|
)
|
|
|
179
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(2,564
|
)
|
|
|
4,888
|
|
|
|
(7,872
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,199
|
|
|
|
4,366
|
|
|
|
(6,418
|
)
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
10,176
|
|
|
|
(786
|
)
|
|
|
4,762
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(2,601
|
)
|
|
|
(3,880
|
)
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
21,489
|
|
|
|
60,602
|
|
|
|
52,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions and related costs, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(4,391
|
)
|
|
|
(3,749
|
)
|
|
|
(320,480
|
)
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(45,018
|
)
|
|
|
(54,992
|
)
|
|
|
(22,523
|
)
|
Additions to intangible assets
|
|
|
(7,024
|
)
|
|
|
(7,545
|
)
|
|
|
(7,963
|
)
|
Decrease in restricted cash
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(56,833
|
)
|
|
|
(66,246
|
)
|
|
|
(350,919
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under revolving credit agreement
|
|
|
87,075
|
|
|
|
24,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295,000
|
|
Principal payments of term loan
|
|
|
(22,115
|
)
|
|
|
(14,194
|
)
|
|
|
(3,750
|
)
|
Principal payments on borrowings under revolving credit
agreement and other debt
|
|
|
(34,866
|
)
|
|
|
(20,895
|
)
|
|
|
(85,062
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock to investors, net of
issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,865
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock to investor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,107
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock to employees
|
|
|
1,992
|
|
|
|
2,474
|
|
|
|
2,669
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options by employees and warrants
|
|
|
2,143
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
2,860
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,161
|
)
|
Debt and equity issuance costs
|
|
|
(2,246
|
)
|
|
|
(808
|
)
|
|
|
(14,033
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(183
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
31,800
|
|
|
|
(8,521
|
)
|
|
|
310,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
(423
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(3,539
|
)
|
|
|
(13,825
|
)
|
|
|
12,246
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
6,624
|
|
|
|
20,449
|
|
|
|
8,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
|
$
|
3,085
|
|
|
$
|
6,624
|
|
|
$
|
20,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
30,752
|
|
|
$
|
28,943
|
|
|
$
|
15,599
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
$
|
515
|
|
|
$
|
849
|
|
|
$
|
1,163
|
|
Non-cash Transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued and options assumed in connection with
acquisitions
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,570
|
|
Warrants issued for patents
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,305
|
|
Common stock issued in exchange for preferred stock
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,107
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Capital leases and other long term debt issued for purchase of
equipment
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,205
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-6
L-1
IDENTITY SOLUTIONS, INC.
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
1.
|
DESCRIPTION
OF BUSINESS
|
L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc. and its subsidiaries
(L-1 or the Company) provide solutions
and services that protect and secure personal identities and
assets and allow international governments, federal and state
agencies, law enforcement and commercial businesses to guard the
public against terrorism, crime and identity theft.
Recent
Transactions
In January 2010, L-1 announced that one of its strategic goals
and objectives for 2010 was to explore strategic alternatives to
enhance shareholder value. Subsequently, on September 19,
2010, the Company entered into an agreement (the Merger
Agreement) with Safran SA (Safran) and Laser
Acquisition Sub Inc. (Merger Sub), a wholly owned
subsidiary of Safran, pursuant to which, subject to the terms
and conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, the Company is
to be acquired by Safran in a merger transaction providing for
shareholders to receive $12.00 per share in cash, for an
aggregate enterprise value of approximately $1.6 billion,
inclusive of outstanding debt. Completion of the merger remains
subject to certain conditions, including, among others,
(i) termination or expiration of the Committee on Foreign
Investment in the United States (CFIUS) review
period pursuant to the Exon-Florio Provision of the Defense
Production Act of 1950; (ii) no Company Material Adverse
Effect (as defined in the Merger Agreement) having occurred
since the date of the Merger Agreement; (iii) subject to
certain materiality exceptions, the accuracy of the
representations and warranties made by the Company and Safran
and compliance by the Company and Safran with their respective
obligations under the Merger Agreement; (iv) no law or
government order prohibiting the merger; and (v) other
customary conditions.
In February 2011, the Company completed its previously announced
sale of the Intel Business to BAE Systems Information Solutions,
Inc. (BAE) (a subsidiary of BAE Systems, Inc., the
U.S. affiliate of BAE Systems plc). Pursuant to the terms
of the Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 19, 2010
(the BAE Purchase Agreement), by and between the
Company and BAE, the Company sold the Intel Business to BAE for
a purchase price of $295.8 million in cash (inclusive of
acquired cash) and approximately $7.2 million in assumed
obligations, the net proceeds of which were used to repay
$289.3 million of outstanding debt under the Companys
credit agreement.
The accompanying financial statements reflect the impact of the
sale of the Intel Business whose operating results have been
reflected as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
Unless otherwise noted, revenues and expenses in these notes to
consolidated financial statements exclude amounts attributable
to discontinued operations. The assets and liabilities of the
discontinued operations have been included in assets held for
sale and liabilities related to assets held for sale at
December 31, 2010. The consolidated financial statements do
not reflect the pro forma effect of the sale of the Intel
Business or the repayment of the long-term debt under the terms
of the Credit Agreement.
Overview
The Company operates in two reportable segments: Solutions and
Services. The Solutions segment includes Secure Credentialing
and Biometrics/Enterprise Access. Secure Credentialing solutions
span the entire secure credentialing lifecycle, from testing
through issuance and inspection. This includes drivers
licenses, national IDs, ePassports and other forms of
government-issued proof of identity credentials. Biometric
solutions capture, manage and move biometric data for positive,
rapid ID and tracking of persons of interest. Biometrics
solutions also encompass access control readers that enable
businesses and governments to secure facilities and restricted
areas by preventing unauthorized entry.
The Services segment includes Enrollment Services. Enrollment
Services performs fingerprint-based background checks necessary
for federal and state licensed employment in the banking,
finance, insurance, healthcare, legal, real estate, education
and other industries.
F-7
Customers, depending on their needs, may order solutions that
include hardware, equipment, consumables, software products or
services or combine hardware products, consumables, equipment,
software products and services to create multiple element
arrangements.
Summary
Parent Companys Financial Data
The Company has no operations other than those carried through
its investment in L-1 Operating and the financing operations
related to the issuance of the Convertible Notes. A summary
balance sheet of the Company (Parent Company only) is set forth
below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred financing costs
|
|
$
|
1,439
|
|
|
$
|
2,506
|
|
Investment in L-1 Operating
|
|
|
909,465
|
|
|
|
894,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
910,904
|
|
|
$
|
897,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
$
|
825
|
|
|
$
|
825
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
3,107
|
|
|
|
5,200
|
|
Convertible debt
|
|
|
166,641
|
|
|
|
161,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,573
|
|
|
|
167,033
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
740,331
|
|
|
|
730,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
910,904
|
|
|
$
|
897,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Principles
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
L-1 and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and controlled entities,
after elimination of material inter-company transactions and
balances.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. The most significant
assumptions and estimates relate to the allocation of the
purchase price of the acquired businesses, assessing the
impairment of goodwill, other intangible assets and property and
equipment, revenue recognition, estimating the useful life of
long-lived assets, inventory valuation, provision for bad debts,
income taxes, litigation and valuation of and accounting for
financial instruments, including convertible notes, interest
rate protection agreements, foreign currency contracts, warrants
and stock options. Actual results could differ materially from
those estimates.
Computation
of Net Income (Loss) per Share
Basic net income (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net
income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the year. Diluted net income (loss) per share
is based upon the weighted average number of dilutive common and
common equivalent shares outstanding during the year.
The per share amounts do not reflect the impact of outstanding
in the money stock options, warrants and restricted share awards
of 0.4 million, 0.3 million, and 0.7 million
shares during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and
2008, respectively, as their effect would have been
anti-dilutive.
F-8
The Company calculates the effect of the Convertible Notes on
diluted net income per share utilizing the if
converted method since the Company has the right to issue
shares of common stock to settle the entire obligation upon
conversion. For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and
2008, the effect was anti-dilutive. Accordingly, approximately
5.5 million shares of common stock issuable at conversion
have been excluded from the determination of weighted average
diluted shares outstanding.
In connection with the issuance of the Convertible Notes, the
Company entered into a pre-paid forward contract with Bear
Stearns (now JP Morgan Chase) for a payment of
$69.8 million to purchase 3.5 million shares of the
Companys common stock at a price of $20.00 per share for
delivery in 2012. The number of shares to be delivered under the
contract is used to reduce weighted average basic and diluted
shares outstanding for income (loss) per share purposes.
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share calculations for
the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 are as
follows (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net loss of continuing operations, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
(10,014
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,115
|
)
|
|
$
|
(555,309
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income
taxes
|
|
$
|
(6,451
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,888
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to L-1s shareholders
|
|
$
|
(16,486
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,198
|
)
|
|
$
|
(551,594
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
87,756
|
|
|
|
85,516
|
|
|
|
77,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7.16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to L-1s shareholders
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7.12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
Recognition
The Company derives its revenue from sales of solutions that
include hardware, components, consumables and software
components and related maintenance, technical support, training
and installation services integral to sales of hardware and
software. The Company also derives revenues from sales of
fingerprinting enrollment services and government security and
information technologies services. A customer, depending on its
needs, may order solutions that include hardware, equipment,
consumables, software products or services or combine these
products and services to create a multiple element arrangement.
When a customer arrangement does not require significant
production, modification or customization of software and does
not include certain services considered to be essential to the
functionality of the software or is not otherwise within the
scope of standards applicable to long term contracts, revenue is
recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and
collection is probable.
Transactions which typically do not involve significant
production, modification or customization of software, or do not
otherwise include services considered to be essential to the
functionality of the software include:
|
|
|
|
|
Secure Credentialing solutions, primarily to federal and state
government customers.
|
|
|
|
Sales of hardware products and related maintenance and services.
|
|
|
|
Sales of printing system components and consumables including
printers, secure coating ribbon, film, and other parts,
primarily to federal government customers.
|
F-9
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of portable devices that provide iris and face and
fingerprint identification and recognition and related
maintenance and services.
|
|
|
|
Licenses of
off-the-shelf
versions of fingerprint, face and iris recognition software and
related maintenance and services.
|
|
|
|
Sales of software and software developer kits and related
maintenance and services.
|
|
|
|
Services and software to scan, collect, and transmit
fingerprints for identity and background verification.
|
|
|
|
Document authentication solutions, which typically include sales
of hardware, software, maintenance and support.
|
|
|
|
Information technology and security services provided to
U.S. intelligence community.
|
Many of the Companys arrangements include multiple
elements. Such arrangements may include one or more of the
following elements: consumables, equipment, hardware, software,
rights to additional software, when and if available software,
software maintenance, hardware maintenance, hardware
replacement, technical support services, training, installation
and consulting services. For arrangements that include multiple
elements that are not within the scope of standards applicable
to software revenue recognition, the Company allocates value to
each element based on the relative estimated fair value of each
element, if fair value exists for each element. For arrangements
within the scope of standards applicable to software revenue
recognition, which do not involve significant modification or
customization of the software or otherwise include services that
are considered essential to the functionality of the software,
the Company allocates value to each element based on its
relative fair value, based on vendor specific objective evidence
(VSOE) of fair value, which is determined based on
the prices charged when each element is sold separately,
considering renewals and other evidence of fair value, as
appropriate. If fair value or VSOE of fair value, if applicable,
exists for all undelivered elements, but does not exist for the
delivered element, then the residual method is used to allocate
value for each element. Under the residual method, each
undelivered element is allocated value based on fair value or
VSOE of fair value, if applicable, for that element and the
remainder of the total arrangement consideration is allocated to
the delivered element. If fair value or VSOE of fair value, if
applicable, does not exist for all undelivered elements, revenue
is deferred until such time as fair value of undelivered
elements is established, at which time revenue is recognized for
all delivered elements. Revenue for maintenance and support is
recognized ratably over the remaining term of any maintenance
support period.
For transactions not within the scope of standards applicable to
revenue recognition for long term contracts or software sales,
revenue is generally recognized upon passage of title for
product sales, and performance for services, provided the four
revenue recognition criteria listed above are met. In certain
cases, customer acceptance is required, in which case revenue is
deferred until customer acceptance is obtained. If the fee due
from the customer is not fixed or determinable, revenue is
recognized as payments become due from the customer. If
collection is not considered probable, revenue is recognized
when the revenue is collected. Maintenance, hardware
replacement, and technical support revenues are typically
recognized ratably over the contract term, which approximates
the timing of services rendered. Revenues from security,
technology, training and similar services, including in revenue
earned under time and material, fixed price level of effort and
cost reimbursable contracts, is recognized as the services are
rendered. Revenue from the collection and transmission of
fingerprints for identity and background verification is
recognized when the fingerprint is transmitted to applicable
background vetting agency. L-1s arrangements generally do
not include a right to return. Expenses on all services are
recognized when the costs are incurred.
Revenue related to consumables, equipment and hardware sales
that require no installation is recognized in accordance with
the terms of the sale, generally when the product is shipped,
provided no significant obligations remain and collection of the
receivable is deemed reasonably assured. Certain hardware sales
to end users require installation subsequent to shipment and
transfer of title. Recognition of revenue related to hardware
sales that are contingent on installation is deferred until
installation is complete, title has transferred and customer
acceptance has been obtained. When hardware products are sold
through authorized representatives, dealers, distributors or
other third party sales channels the obligation to install the
hardware generally
F-10
does not remain the Companys responsibility, but is rather
an obligation of the authorized representative, dealer,
distributor or other third party and to its ultimate customer.
Consequently, for sales to third party distributors, revenue is
recognized at the time title is transferred, which is generally
upon shipment. On rare occasions, the Company is required to
install products on behalf of third party distributors. In these
cases, revenue is recorded in the same manner as products sold
to end users where acceptance of the product by the third party
distributor is contingent upon successful installation of the
product.
Revenue from software sales and licenses is recognized in
accordance with standards applicable to software sales. The
Company recognizes revenue of software products when persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the
fee is fixed and determinable, and the collection is probable
and VSOE exists for the undelivered element.
In the event that a multiple element arrangement includes
hardware, software and services and the software is
more-than-incidental
to the arrangement, but not essential to the functionality of
the hardware, the company recognizes revenues on software and
non software elements pursuant to the respective standards
applicable to software and non software elements.
When multiple-element arrangements include software deliverables
and involve significant production, modification or
customization of the software, or otherwise involve services
that are considered to be essential to the functionality of the
software, L-1 applies the accounting standards applicable to
long term contracts. When VSOE of fair value exists for software
maintenance, technical support or other services in arrangements
requiring contract accounting, revenue for software maintenance,
technical support and other services is recognized as the
services are performed and the rest of the arrangement is
accounted for under standards applicable to long term contracts.
When VSOE of fair value is not available for such services the
entire arrangement is accounted for under standards applicable
to long term contracts and the related revenue is recognized
with the rest of the contract deliverables under the percentage
of completion method.
In general, transactions that involve significant production,
modification or customization of software, or otherwise include
services considered to be essential to the functionality of the
software and which are accounted in accordance with standards
applicable to long term contracts, include:
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts or elements of contracts for the production of
drivers licenses and other identification credentials that
require delivery and installation of customized software.
|
|
|
|
Identity solutions contracts, typically providing for the
development, customization and installation of fingerprinting,
face and iris recognition solutions for government agencies, law
enforcement agencies and businesses. These contracts are
generally for a fixed price, and include milestones and
acceptance criteria for the various deliverables under the
contract.
|
In addition, the Company uses contract accounting for certain
federal government contracts.
Revenue from long term contracts is recognized under the
percentage of completion method. The Company measures the
percentage of completion using either input measures (e.g.,
costs incurred) or output measures (e.g., contract milestones),
whichever provides the most reliable and meaningful measure of
performance in the circumstances. Milestones are specific events
or deliverables clearly identified in the contract and can
include delivering customized systems, installation and
services. When milestone measures are used, revenue is
recognized when performance of milestones is achieved. The
Company recognizes revenue based on the total milestones
billable to the customer less revenue related to any future
maintenance service requirements. On contracts where milestones
are not used, the Company generally recognizes revenue on a
cost-to-cost
basis or as the units are delivered, whichever is most
appropriate in the circumstances. The cumulative impact of any
revision in estimates to complete or recognition of losses on
contracts is reflected in the period in which the changes or
losses become known. The excess of billings under these
contracts as current assets.
Drivers license contracts or credentialing contracts or
contract elements within such contracts, generally require that
L-1 incur upfront costs related to software, hardware and other
equipment. Such costs are capitalized and are depreciated over
the of the contract term life, beginning when the system goes
into service.
F-11
The delivery of credentials or licenses typically requires us to
customize, design, and install equipment and software at
customer locations, as well as perform training, supply
consumables, maintain equipment and provide support services.
Costs related to customized software are capitalized during the
period L-1 is designing and installing the system and are
amortized over the estimated useful life beginning when the
system goes into service. Revenue on these contracts is earned
based on, and is contingent upon, the production of licenses or
credentials utilizing the deployed system and is therefore
recognized when the credentials are produced. If contractual
arrangements include the sale of consumables on equipment whose
title is transferred to the customer, the Company recognizes
revenue when title is transferred.
Cash and
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers highly liquid investments with original
maturities of three months or less at the time of acquisition to
be cash equivalents. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the
Companys cash equivalents consisted of money market
accounts and overnight investments with banks.
Financial
Instruments
The carrying amounts of accounts receivable, net, accounts
payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities
approximate their fair values due to the short term maturities.
The carrying amount of borrowings under the revolving credit
agreement approximates fair value since the long-term debt bears
interest at variable rates. The fair value of the Convertible
Notes and Term Loan is based on transaction prices. The fair
value of interest rate protection agreements and foreign
currency forward contracts are determined based on the estimated
amounts that such contracts could be settled with the
counterparty at the balance sheet date, taking into account
current interest rates, future expectations of interest rates,
and L-1s current credit worthiness. The recorded and
estimated fair values are as follows at December 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets (Liabilities)
|
|
|
Recorded amount at
|
|
Fair Value at
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2010
|
|
Accounts Receivable
|
|
$
|
103,091
|
|
|
$
|
103,091
|
|
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses, Excluding Interest Rate
Protection Agreements and Foreign Currency Contracts
|
|
|
(89,300
|
)
|
|
|
(89,300
|
)
|
Other Current Liabilities
|
|
|
(7,503
|
)
|
|
|
(7,503
|
)
|
Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
|
(57,943
|
)
|
|
|
(57,943
|
)
|
Term Loan
|
|
|
(257,857
|
)
|
|
|
(260,266
|
)
|
Convertible Notes
|
|
|
(166,641
|
)
|
|
|
(172,947
|
)
|
Other Debt
|
|
|
(1,022
|
)
|
|
|
(1,022
|
)
|
Derivatives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Forward Contracts (included in accounts payable
and accrued expenses)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
Interest Rate Protection Agreements (included in accrued
expenses)
|
|
|
(1,238
|
)
|
|
|
(1,238
|
)
|
F-12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded amount at
|
|
Fair Value at
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
Accounts Receivable
|
|
$
|
116,353
|
|
|
$
|
116,353
|
|
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses, Excluding Interest Rate
Protection Agreements and Foreign Currency Contracts
|
|
|
(108,184
|
)
|
|
|
(108,184
|
)
|
Other Current Liabilities
|
|
|
(6,680
|
)
|
|
|
(6,680
|
)
|
Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
|
(4,868
|
)
|
|
|
(4,868
|
)
|
Term Loan
|
|
|
(278,878
|
)
|
|
|
(283,833
|
)
|
Convertible Notes
|
|
|
(161,008
|
)
|
|
|
(160,388
|
)
|
Other Debt
|
|
|
(1,611
|
)
|
|
|
(1,611
|
)
|
Derivatives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Forward Contracts (included in accounts payable
and accrued expenses)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Interest Rate Protection Agreements (included in accounts
payable and accrued expenses)
|
|
|
(1,896
|
)
|
|
|
(1,896
|
)
|
Concentrations
of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that subject the Company to credit risk
primarily consist of cash equivalents and accounts receivable.
The Companys credit risk is managed by investing cash and
cash equivalents primarily in high-quality money market
instruments.
Accounts receivable are principally due from government agencies
and contractors to government agencies. No collateral is
required. Accounts receivable are not sold or factored. Billings
rendered in connection with work performed are in accordance
with the terms of the contract and collateral is not required.
Management periodically reviews accounts receivable for possible
uncollectible amounts. In the event management determines a
specific need for an allowance, a provision for doubtful
accounts is provided.
Excluding discontinued operations, as of December 31, 2010
and 2009, U.S. Federal government agencies, directly or
indirectly, accounted for 8 percent and 18 percent of
consolidated accounts receivable, respectively. Including
discontinued operations, as of December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, U.S. Federal government agencies, directly or
indirectly accounted for 34 and 46 percent of consolidated
accounts receivable.
Inventory
and Suppliers
Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market. L-1 uses the
first-in,
first-out method to determine costs of inventory. The Company
evaluates inventory on a quarterly basis for obsolete or
slow-moving items and records the resulting write-downs to cost
of revenues. L-1 obtains certain products and services from a
limited group of suppliers and contract manufacturers. While a
loss of a supplier could delay sales and increase the
Companys costs, alternative sources of suppliers are
available.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost or at fair value for
items acquired under capital leases or in acquisitions. Cost
includes capitalized interest for self constructed assets.
Depreciation and amortization are calculated using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
related assets.
System assets acquired and developed in connection with
drivers license contracts are depreciated over the
estimated useful life of the related contract, ranging from one
to seven years, using the straight-line method beginning when
the system goes into service. The straight line method
approximates the pattern of recognition of the gross revenues
over the estimated useful life of the contracts, which take into
account contract options that the Company believes will be
exercised.
F-13
Intangible
Assets
Intangible assets primarily consist of completed technology,
trade names, customer contracts and relationships and other
assets primarily arising from the acquisition of businesses or
business assets. These intangible assets are primarily amortized
on a basis consistent with the timing and pattern of expected
cash flows used to value the intangibles, generally on a
straight line basis over useful lives ranging from 3 to
25 years.
Goodwill
The Company tests goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, or
between annual tests, in certain circumstances, such as the
incurrence of operating losses or a significant decline in
earnings associated with the asset. The Company evaluates
goodwill for impairment using the two-step approach as
prescribed in the relevant guidance. The first step is to
compare the fair value of the reporting unit to the carrying
amount of the reporting unit. If the carrying amount exceeds the
fair value, a second step must be followed to calculate
impairment. The Company performs the initial step by comparing
the carrying value to the estimated fair value of the reporting
units, which in 2009 was determined primarily by using the
discounted cash flows method, but considered comparable market
multiples and market transactions when available and suitable,
as well as other factors. In 2010, the estimated fair value was
based on the enterprise value derived from the sales price of
the Intel Business and the sale of the Company pursuant to the
transactions described in Note 1. Based upon these tests,
L-1 determined that no goodwill impairment resulted at
October 31, 2010, the date of the annual goodwill
impairment test for the reporting units included in continuing
operations or as of September 30, 2010, the date of the
interim goodwill impairment test for the reporting units
comprising the discontinued operations. In 2008, L-1 determined
the fair value of the biometrics business units were less than
their carrying amounts resulting in a goodwill impairment. See
Note 14.
Long-Lived
Assets
The Company evaluates long-lived assets with finite lives, such
as intangible assets, property and equipment and certain other
assets, for impairment in accordance with the standard,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets. L-1 records an impairment charge whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
the assets may not be recoverable from estimated undiscounted
future cash flows from the use of these assets. When such
impairment is indicated, the related assets are written down to
estimated fair value.
Research
and Development Costs
Research and development costs are charged to expense as
incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and
2008, the Company received funding under time and materials
contracts to perform services for conceptual formulation, design
or testing of possible product or process alternatives, which it
recorded as an operating expense offset under the requirements
of the standard, Research and Development Arrangements.
The Company received funding of $0.6 million,
$0.4 million, and $0.5 million during the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. In certain
circumstances the government obtains a royalty free right to use
the technology developed under these contracts. The Company
generally retains the right to the data and ownership of the
results of its own research and development efforts.
In addition, the Company has research and development contracts
which are accounted for pursuant to the standards applicable to
long term contracts. The Company recognized revenues of
$6.8 million, $4.9 million and $6.7 million
related to these contracts during the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Financing
Costs
Costs incurred in obtaining financing are capitalized and
amortized over the term of the related debt using the effective
interest method. Amortization of deferred financing costs was
$5.2 million, $4.6 million and $4.2 million
during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008,
respectively, of which $1.6 million,
F-14
$1.3 million, and $1.4 million, is included in
continuing operations. Accretion of debt discount, also using
the effective interest method, was $6.7 million,
$6.5 million and $4.5 million during the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. Costs
related to modifications of financing arrangements that do not
qualify as extinguishment of debt are expensed as incurred.
Software
Costs
The Company capitalizes certain costs incurred in the
development of computer software to be sold or leased once
technological feasibility is reached. During the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company capitalized
$3.6 million, $4.6 million and $6.9 million,
respectively, which are being amortized over three to five
years. L-1 recorded amortization expense of $2.9 million,
$2.2 million and $2.4 million related to these assets
during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Costs related to software developed for internal use are
expensed as incurred until the application development stage has
been reached. Costs for externally purchased software are
capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful life not
to exceed five years. Costs for self constructed assets includes
capitalized interest.
Warranty
The Company provides a warranty for manufacturing and material
defects on hardware sold. A reserve for warranty costs, based on
estimates utilizing projected costs to repair units, is recorded
and periodically adjusted to reflect actual experience. See
Note 3.
Income
Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the
estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences
between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred income tax
assets and liabilities are measured using currently enacted tax
rates and changes in tax rates are recognized in income in the
period that includes the enactment date. The deferred tax asset
valuation allowance is increased or reduced when the Company,
based on estimated income of the appropriate character and in
the appropriate jurisdiction, determines it is more likely than
not that the amounts of the deferred tax benefits that will not
be realized differ from the recorded amounts. Prior to
January 1, 2009, a reduction of the valuation allowance was
recorded either as a benefit in the income statement or as a
reduction of goodwill if the reduction was related to
pre-acquisition net operating loss carry-forwards. After
December 31, 2008, all changes in the valuation allowance
are reflected in the statement of operations.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, management evaluated the
adequacy of the valuation allowance in light of the results for
the year and determined that, based on the cumulative results of
operations for the three years ended December 31, 2008,
after considering items that do not enter in the determination
of taxable income, and the likely future operating results, it
was more likely than not that the portion of the tax benefits of
net operating loss carry-forwards that would not be realized
would be higher than previously recorded. As a result, the
Company increased the deferred tax asset valuation allowance to
reflect the estimated tax benefits it expected to realize.
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company
reevaluated the adequacy of the valuation allowance based on the
same methodology used in 2008 and 2009, and determined that the
valuation allowance should be decreased. It is possible that,
depending on the cumulative results of operations for the three
year period ending on December 31, 2011, after considering
items that do not enter in the determination of taxable income,
and the then likely operating results, the valuation allowance
may be increased or decreased.
The Company recognizes the tax benefits of a tax position if the
Company determines that it is more likely than not that a tax
position will be sustained based on the technical merits of the
position, on the presumption that the position will be examined
by the appropriate taxing authority that would have full
knowledge of all relevant information. The tax position is
measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than
50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate
settlement.
F-15
Foreign
Currency Translation and Transactions
Assets and liabilities of L-1s operations in Germany,
India and Canada are denominated in Euros, Rupees and Canadian
dollars, respectively, which are also the functional currencies
and are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates as
of each balance sheet date. Income and expense accounts are
translated into U.S. dollars at the average rates of
exchange prevailing during the periods presented. Adjustments
resulting from translating foreign currency financial statements
into U.S. dollars of operations whose functional currencies
are the local currency are included in accumulated other
comprehensive income or loss as a separate component in equity.
The functional currency of the Companys Mexican operations
is the U.S. dollar. Accordingly, monetary assets and
liabilities are re-measured to U.S. dollars at the balance
sheet date with the gain or loss reflected in income.
Non-monetary assets and liabilities are re-measured in
U.S. dollars at historical rates.
From time to time, the Company utilizes foreign currency forward
contracts to mitigate the exchange rate impact of specific
purchase obligations denominated in foreign currencies. All
gains and losses resulting from the change in fair value of the
contracts are recorded in operations. For the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, other expense, net,
included a loss of approximately $0.7 million,
$0.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively,
consisting of realized and unrealized gains and losses related
to foreign currency transactions and balances. None of the
foreign currency forward contracts were terminated prior to
settlement. The fair value of forward currency contracts at
resulted in unrealized losses of less than $0.1 million in
2010 and 2009 and an unrealized gain of $0.4 million in
2008.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date
based on the fair value of the award and compensation cost is
recognized as an expense over the requisite service period of
the award, generally the vesting period based on the awards
expected to vest. The estimated fair value of restricted stock
and stock option awards is determined on the date of the grant.
L-1 uses the Black-Scholes valuation model to estimate the fair
value of option awards. Determining the appropriate fair value
model and related assumptions requires judgment, including
estimating common stock price volatility, forfeiture rates and
expected terms. The expected volatility rate is based on the
historical volatility of the Companys common stock. The
expected life of options is based on the average life of
6.3 years. The Company estimated forfeitures when
recognizing compensation expense based on historical rates. The
risk free interest rate is based on the 7 year treasury
security as it approximates the estimated 6.3 year expected
life of the options. The Company updates these assumptions on at
least an annual basis and on an interim basis if significant
changes to the assumptions are warranted. In 2010, 2009 and
2008, the Company updated its forfeiture rate assumption, which
resulted in a decrease of expense of $1.7 million in 2010,
a increase of $1.7 million in 2009 and a decrease in
expense of $0.3 million in 2008. Restricted stock awards
are valued at the market price at the date of grant.
Stock-based compensation from both continuing and discontinued
operations for 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $25.6 million,
$23.7 million and $18.1 million, respectively, and
includes $3.7 million in 2010, $1.6 million in 2009
and $0.7 million in 2008 related to restricted stock
issuances. Stock-based compensation also includes
$0.0 million, $0.2 million and $0.3 million for
2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, for incentive compensation
settled or to be settled in common stock and fully vested stock
options, as well as stock-based compensation related to the
Companys retirement plan contributions, settled or to be
settled in, common stock of $10.4 million,
$9.4 million, and $6.5 million for 2010, 2009, 2008,
respectively. The Company has recognized all compensation
expense in the consolidated statements of operations for 2010,
2009 and 2008.
F-16
Stock based compensation attributable to discontinued operations
was $9.1 million, $8.7 million and $6.3 million
for the 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The following table
presents stock-based compensation expense included in continuing
operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
1,053
|
|
|
$
|
873
|
|
|
$
|
987
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
1,576
|
|
|
|
1,785
|
|
|
|
1,814
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
2,036
|
|
|
|
1,944
|
|
|
|
1,818
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
11,908
|
|
|
|
10,398
|
|
|
|
7,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stock-based compensation
|
|
$
|
16,573
|
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
11,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertising
Costs
Advertising costs are charged to expense as incurred.
Advertising expense for the years ended December 31, 2010,
2009 and 2008 was $0.3 million, $0.2 million and
$0.3 million, respectively.
Adoption
of New Accounting Standards
In January 2010, the FASB issued the standard, Fair
Value Measurements and Disclosures Improving
Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. The
adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the
financial statements for any of the periods presented.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In October 2009, the FASB issued the standard, Multiple
Element Arrangements, which modifies accounting for
multiple element arrangements by requiring that the separation
of the arrangements be based on estimated selling prices based
on entity specific assumptions rather than fair value,
eliminating the residual method of allocation and requiring
additional disclosures related to such arrangements. The
standard is effective prospectively for arrangements entered
into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or
after June 15, 2010. The Company has not yet evaluated the
impact the adoption of the standard will have on its
consolidated financial statements.
Also in October 2009, the FASB issued the standard,
Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software
Elements, which amends software revenue recognition
guidance to eliminate from its scope tangible products
containing software components that function together to deliver
the tangible products essential functionality and to
provide guidance on how to allocate arrangement consideration to
deliverables in an arrangement that contain both tangible
products and software. The standard is effective prospectively
for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in
fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The
Company has not yet evaluated the impact the adoption of the
standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.
F-17
|
|
3.
|
ADDITIONAL
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
Property
and equipment
Property and equipment comprised the following as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
System assets
|
|
$
|
140,947
|
|
|
$
|
92,753
|
|
|
|
3-7 years
|
|
Computer and office equipment
|
|
|
12,974
|
|
|
|
9,147
|
|
|
|
3-5 years
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
23,246
|
|
|
|
23,107
|
|
|
|
2 years
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
32,868
|
|
|
|
53,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
8,302
|
|
|
|
7,652
|
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
Other- including tooling and demo equipment
|
|
|
5,438
|
|
|
|
4,234
|
|
|
|
2-5 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223,775
|
|
|
|
190,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less, accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
97,591
|
|
|
|
74,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
126,184
|
|
|
$
|
115,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010, property and equipment of
$0.4 million, net of accumulated depreciation of
$0.9 million was included in assets held for sale in the
accompanying balance sheet.
Capital expenditures in 2010 aggregated $45.0 million,
substantially all of which is principally related to the
Solutions segment.
Depreciation expense on property and equipment for the years
ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was
$28.4 million, $23.5 million and $18.1 million,
respectively, of which $0.2 million, $0.2 million, and
$0.3 million is included in discontinued operations. For
the three years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the
Company capitalized interest of $1.9 million,
$1.8 million and $0.3 million, respectively.
During the third quarter of 2010, the Company and the operator
of the restarted Registered Traveler program were unable to
negotiate mutually acceptable terms related to the
Companys participation in the program. Accordingly, the
Company determined that the assets designated for the program
were impaired and recorded an impairment of $2.9 million.
Included in the asset impairment charges for 2008 is
$3.4 million related to certain biometrics property and
equipment. See Note 14 to the consolidated financial
statements.
The following table presents depreciation and amortization
expense, excluding amortization of acquisition related
intangible assets, but includes amortization of other intangible
assets included in continuing operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
28,402
|
|
|
$
|
23,021
|
|
|
$
|
17,098
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
632
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
820
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,836
|
|
|
|
3,419
|
|
|
|
3,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
33,264
|
|
|
$
|
27,171
|
|
|
$
|
21,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
Inventory,
net
Inventory comprised the following as of December 31, 2010
and 2009, net of write downs of $2.3 million and
$3.2 million, respectively (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Purchased parts and materials
|
|
$
|
25,443
|
|
|
$
|
23,107
|
|
Work in progress
|
|
|
1,512
|
|
|
|
615
|
|
Inventoried contract costs
|
|
|
3,585
|
|
|
|
3,193
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
2,132
|
|
|
|
2,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,672
|
|
|
$
|
29,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximately $1.9 million and $2.1 million of
inventory at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, were
held at customer sites.
Goodwill
Goodwill comprises the following for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solutions
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2008
|
|
|
784,595
|
|
|
|
84,637
|
|
|
|
185,038
|
|
|
|
1,054,270
|
|
Reclassification of ComnetiX products business
|
|
|
9,780
|
|
|
|
(9,780
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bioscrypt acquisition
|
|
|
39,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,440
|
|
Old Digimarc acquisition
|
|
|
228,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
228,967
|
|
Impairment charges
|
|
|
(430,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(430,000
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(3,655
|
)
|
|
|
(1,069
|
)
|
|
|
3,024
|
|
|
|
(1,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
629,127
|
|
|
|
73,788
|
|
|
|
188,062
|
|
|
|
890,977
|
|
Old Digimarc final acquisition adjustments
|
|
|
(3,379
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,379
|
)
|
Currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,130
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
1,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
626,499
|
|
|
$
|
74,726
|
|
|
$
|
188,589
|
|
|
$
|
889,814
|
|
Currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
(880
|
)
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(554
|
)
|
Reclassification to Assets Held for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(188,589
|
)
|
|
|
(188,589
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(340
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(340
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
625,279
|
|
|
$
|
75,052
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
700,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010, approximately $145.2 million
of goodwill was deductible for income tax purposes, of which
$46.3 million relates to continuing operations.
The impairment charge recorded in 2008 is the only goodwill
impairment recorded since 2007. See Note 14 to the
consolidated financial statements for additional information.
F-19
Intangible
assets
Intangible assets are comprised of the following as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Acquisition related intangibles:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed technology
|
|
$
|
16,282
|
|
|
$
|
(7,643
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,425
|
|
|
$
|
(4,853
|
)
|
Core technology
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
Trade names and trademarks
|
|
|
1,215
|
|
|
|
(712
|
)
|
|
|
7,263
|
|
|
|
(2,269
|
)
|
Customer contracts and relationships
|
|
|
56,163
|
|
|
|
(21,947
|
)
|
|
|
104,063
|
|
|
|
(31,382
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,000
|
|
|
|
(30,449
|
)
|
|
|
126,091
|
|
|
|
(38,583
|
)
|
Non-acquisition related intangibles
|
|
|
29,168
|
|
|
|
(11,453
|
)
|
|
|
23,591
|
|
|
|
(8,724
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
103,168
|
|
|
$
|
(41,902
|
)
|
|
$
|
149,682
|
|
|
$
|
(47,307
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010, intangible assets of
$37.8 million, net of accumulated amortization of
$16.4 million was included in assets held for sale in the
accompanying balance sheet. As of December 31, 2010,
approximately $63.9 million of intangible assets, net were
deductible for income tax purposes, of which $26.4 million
are included in assets held for sale.
In 2008, the Company recorded an impairment of
$95.2 million for intangible assets, substantially all of
which is related to its biometrics business. See Note 14
for additional information.
Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets for the
years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, was
$8.2 million, $9.7 million and $27.7 million,
respectively, of which $3.0 million, $4.3 million and
$5.3 million, respectively is included in discontinued
operations. Other intangible asset amortization excluding
acquisition related amortization was $5.1 million,
$4.0 million and $3.7 million for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, all of
which is included in continuing operations. The following
summarizes amortization of acquisition related intangible assets
included in continuing operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
5,229
|
|
|
$
|
5,349
|
|
|
$
|
21,564
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,229
|
|
|
$
|
5,349
|
|
|
$
|
22,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of acquisition related intangible assets from
continuing operations for the subsequent five years and
thereafter is as follows: $4.8 million, $4.2 million,
$3.8 million, $2.0 million, $1.7 million and
$27.1 million.
F-20
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
Accounts payable and accrued expenses comprise the following as
of December 31, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
47,516
|
|
|
$
|
48,852
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
9,596
|
|
|
|
12,027
|
|
Accrued vacation
|
|
|
4,826
|
|
|
|
8,373
|
|
Accrued subcontractor costs
|
|
|
3,185
|
|
|
|
5,398
|
|
Accrued professional services
|
|
|
3,506
|
|
|
|
4,836
|
|
Accrued retirement plan contributions
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
6,027
|
|
Other
|
|
|
21,688
|
|
|
|
24,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,567
|
|
|
$
|
110,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty
reserves
The activity in the warranty reserves for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 comprises the following
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
645
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
132
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
747
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
73
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
650
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
202
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable, net
At December 31, 2010 accounts receivable, net includes
unbilled receivables related to continuing operations of
$34.8 million substantially all of which is expected to be
billed and collected in 2011. At December 31, 2010,
included in discontinued operations were $8.9 million of
unbilled receivables. Of the total unbilled receivables from
continuing operations, approximately $12.3 million
represents revenue earned which could not be billed pending
receipt of data to complete the billings, primarily related to
credentials produced. The remaining balances primarily represent
revenues earned which will be billed in accordance with payment
schedules specified, or otherwise in accordance with the terms
of, the contracts. The activity in the accounts
F-21
receivable reserves for the years ended December 31, 2010,
2009, and 2008 comprises the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
1,214
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
825
|
|
Write-offs
|
|
|
(261
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,778
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
4,079
|
|
Write-offs
|
|
|
(948
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
4,909
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
1,278
|
|
Write-offs
|
|
|
(1,284
|
)
|
Reclassification to Assets Held for Sale
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
4,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
The Company is exposed to interest rate risk and foreign
exchange risks that in part are managed by using derivative
financial instruments. These derivatives include foreign
currency forward contracts related to risks associated with
foreign operations and interest protection agreements related to
risks associated to variable rate borrowings. The Company does
not use derivatives for trading purposes and at
December 31, 2010, has no derivatives that are designated
as fair value hedges.
Derivatives are recorded at their estimated fair values.
Derivatives designated and effective as cash flow hedges are
reported as a component of other comprehensive income and
reclassified to earnings in the same periods in which the hedged
transactions impact earnings. Gains and losses related to
derivatives not meeting the requirements of hedge accounting and
the portion of derivatives related to hedge ineffectiveness are
recognized in current earnings.
The Company has entered into interest rate protection agreements
to reduce its exposure to the variable interest rate payments on
its term loan. In October 2008, the Company entered into an
interest rate protection agreement with a notional amount of
$62.5 million, and expires in November, 2011. Under the
term of the agreement, the Company pays the counter party a
fixed rate of 4.1 percent and receives variable interest
based on three-month LIBOR (subject to a floor of
3.0 percent). In May 2009, the Company entered into two
additional interest rate protection agreements with notional
amounts of $50.0 million each, and expire in May 2011,
pursuant to which the Company pays a fixed rate of
1.4 percent and receives three month LIBOR. These
agreements were settled in February 2011.
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company had outstanding
foreign currency forward contracts denominated in Japanese Yen
aggregating $2.9 million and $1.8 million,
respectively.
The following summarizes certain information regarding the
Companys derivatives financial instruments (in thousands)
which have been designated and are effective as cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) reclassified from
|
|
|
|
|
OCI to Income Statement
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
Year
|
|
Year
|
|
Year
|
|
|
In OCI at
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
Interest rate protection agreements
|
|
$
|
(445
|
)
|
|
$
|
(534
|
)
|
|
$
|
(489
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
F-22
The amount included in OCI which is expected to be recognized in
2011 approximates $0.3 million.
The following summarizes certain information regarding the
Companys derivatives financial instruments not designated
or not effective as hedges (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts of Gain (Loss) Recognized
|
|
|
|
|
Income Statement
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Year
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Income Statement
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Caption
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
Interest rate protection agreements
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
$
|
658
|
|
|
$
|
(429
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts
|
|
Other Expense, net
|
|
$
|
(113
|
)
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
435
|
|
Products
and services revenues
The following provides details of the products and services
revenues for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and
2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Federal government services
|
|
$
|
25,673
|
|
|
$
|
35,737
|
|
|
$
|
19,535
|
|
State and local government services
|
|
|
92,137
|
|
|
|
77,708
|
|
|
|
57,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Services
|
|
|
117,810
|
|
|
|
113,445
|
|
|
|
77,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solutions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and local government solutions
|
|
|
122,165
|
|
|
|
117,547
|
|
|
|
67,723
|
|
Hardware and consumables
|
|
|
96,255
|
|
|
|
116,305
|
|
|
|
137,590
|
|
Software, licensing fees and other
|
|
|
76,279
|
|
|
|
56,047
|
|
|
|
46,126
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
37,619
|
|
|
|
33,785
|
|
|
|
29,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Solutions
|
|
|
332,318
|
|
|
|
323,684
|
|
|
|
280,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
$
|
450,128
|
|
|
$
|
437,129
|
|
|
$
|
358,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services revenues included in continuing operations represent
revenues from enrollment services contracts for which the
Company is compensated based on volume of enrollments performed.
Solutions revenues comprise revenues from the delivery of
consumables and equipment, as well as hardware, software and
systems that include related services, primarily maintenance,
bundled with the related product deliverables. Because the
product functionality is the primary deliverable for the
customer, we have included the total revenues from these
arrangements in solutions revenues. Solutions revenues also
include revenues related to drivers license production
contracts for which we provide systems and maintenance, produce
the licenses and are compensated in one all inclusive price per
license as the licenses are produced.
|
|
4.
|
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
Aston Capital Partners, L.P. (Aston), an affiliate
of L-1 Investment Partners LLC, owns approximately
8.1 percent, and of L-1s outstanding common stock.
Mr. Robert LaPenta, Mr. James DePalma, Mr. Joseph
Paresi and Ms. Doni Fordyce, each executive officers of the
Company, directly and indirectly hold all the beneficial
ownership in L-1 Investment Partners LLC and Aston Capital
Partners GP LLC, the investment manager and general partner of
Aston. Mr. LaPenta is also the Chairman of the Board of
Directors and Chief Executive Officer and President of the
Company. Mr. DePalma is also the Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer of the Company.
F-23
Contemporaneously with the execution of the Merger Agreement
described above, on September 19, 2010, Mr. LaPenta,
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and Aston, entered into a voting and support agreement with
Safran and Merger Sub. Pursuant to the voting and support
agreement, Mr. LaPenta and Aston agreed, among other
things, to vote their shares of our common stock in favor of the
adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the merger,
unless the Companys board of directors changes its
recommendation of the merger to shareholders (in which case,
Mr. LaPenta and Aston may vote for or against the merger).
In December 2005, Aston completed a $100 million investment
and became the beneficial owner of L-1s common stock. The
investment agreement provides Aston with a right of first
refusal to purchase a pro rata of new securities issued by L-1,
subject to specified terms.
On August 5, 2008, Mr. Robert LaPenta purchased
750,000 shares of L-1 common stock and 15,107 shares
of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001
per share (Series A Preferred Stock) which in
accordance with its terms was converted to 1,310,992 shares
of common stock in 2009.
In connection with the merger with Identix, Aston and L-1 agreed
in principle that the Company may, subject to approval of the
Companys Board of Directors, purchase AFIX Technologies,
Inc. (AFIX) a portfolio company of Aston, which
provides fingerprint and palmprint identification software to
local law enforcement agencies, at fair market value to be
determined by an independent appraiser retained by the
Companys Board of Directors. A committee of the Board of
Directors was appointed to evaluate a potential transaction. In
March 2009, L-1 concluded that due to a variety of factors, it
was not advisable to pursue the transaction with AFIX.
Receivables from and sales to AFIX at December 31, 2010
were at $0.2 million and less than $0.1 million,
respectively. Receivables from and sales to AFIX at
December 31, 2009 were at $0.1 million and
$0.1 million, respectively.
In connection with the relocation of the corporate headquarters
of the Company in the third quarter of 2006 to the offices of
L-1 Investment Partners LLC in Stamford, Connecticut, the
Company entered into a sublease with L-1 Investment Partners LLC
under which the Company reimburses L-1 Investment Partners LLC
for the rent and other costs payable by the Company. On
June 29, 2009, the sublease was extended until March 2015.
For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the
Company incurred costs of $0.6 million, $0.8 million
and $0.8 million, respectively, related to sublease
agreement.
The Company has employment and non-competition agreements with
all of its executive officers. Such agreements provide for
employment and related compensation and restrict the individuals
from competing with the Company. The agreements also provide for
the grant of stock options under the Companys stock option
plans and for severance upon termination under circumstances
defined in such agreements.
As a condition to the closing of the merger between the Company
and Identix Incorporated (Identix), the Company and
L-1 Investment Partners LLC entered into a Termination and
Noncompete Agreement which, among other things,
(1) terminated all arrangements whereby L-1 Investment
Partners LLC and its affiliates provided financial, advisory,
administrative or other services to the Company or its
affiliates, and (2) prohibits L-1 Investment Partners LLC
and its affiliates from engaging or assisting any person that
competes directly or indirectly with the Company in the business
of biometric, credentialing and ID management business anywhere
in the United States or anywhere else in the world where the
Company does business, or plans to do business or is actively
evaluating doing business during the restricted period; provided
however that the foregoing does not restrict L-1 Investment
Partners LLC and its affiliates from retaining its investment in
and advising AFIX Technologies, Inc. The restricted period runs
co-terminously with the term of Mr. LaPentas
employment agreement with the Company, dated as of
August 29, 2006, and for a twelve month period following
the expiration of the term of Mr. LaPentas employment
agreement. On April 23, 2007, the Company entered into an
employee arrangement with Mr. Robert LaPenta, Jr., the
son of the Companys Chief Executive Officer, to serve as
Vice President, M&A/Corporate Development.
The Company has consulting agreements with Mr. Denis K.
Berube, a former member of the Companys Board of
Directors, and his spouse, Ms. Joanna Lau, under which each
receives annual compensation of $0.1 million. Each
agreement terminates on the earlier of January 10, 2012, or
commencement of full time
F-24
employment elsewhere. Under the terms of a 2002 acquisition
agreement with Lau Security Systems, an affiliate of
Mr. Berube and Ms. Lau, the Company is obligated to
pay Lau a royalty on certain of its face recognition revenues
through June 30, 2014, up to a maximum of
$27.5 million. The estimated royalty earned during the
twelve months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 amounted to
$0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively.
On February 26 and February 28, 2010, the Company entered
into an engagement letter with each of Goldman Sachs &
Co. (Goldman) and Stone Key Partners LLC and Hudson
Partners Securities LLC (Stone Key), pursuant to
which they are acting as financial advisors to the Company in
connection with the Companys exploration of strategic
alternatives to enhance shareholder value. Both Goldman and
Stone Key were selected after a competitive evaluation process
involving multiple prospective advisors. In connection with
their respective engagements, Goldman and Stone Key are entitled
to receive customary fees from the Company. These fees, a
substantial portion of which are payable in the event a
transaction or transactions are consummated, would be allocated
approximately 58% to Goldman and 42% to Stone Key. The aggregate
transaction fee payable to the advisors would be 1.2% of the
transaction value of which 15% was earned upon the delivery of
the fairness opinions and the signing of a definitive
transaction agreements, which occurred on September 19,
2010. Accordingly, the Company recorded aggregate liabilities
for transaction fees and expenses of $3.0 million of which
$1.3 million is due to Stone Key. The remainder would be
earned upon closing of the Safran and BAE transactions. In
addition, Stone Key would be entitled to a reduced fee if the
Company receives a break up fee or similar payment
in connection with the termination of a signed transaction
agreement. Similar features apply to the Goldman engagement fee
structure and the Company believes such arrangements are
customary. Upon successful completion of the merger transaction
with Safran described above, the Company will pay Stone Key and
Goldman estimated aggregate transaction fees of
$18.9 million of which $7.9 million is payable to
Stone Key.
Michael J. Urfirer, is a co-owner and co-founder of Stone
Keys parent company, is Co-Chairman and Co-CEO of Stone
Key, and is also the husband of Doni L. Fordyce, our Executive
Vice President of Corporate Communications. Mr. Urfirer has
confirmed to the Company that he has no specific interest in any
fees paid to Stone Key attributable to his status as co-owner of
Stone Key and its affiliates or otherwise. He will not receive
any commission, direct participation or similar payment in
connection with Stone Keys receipt of any fees. In his
capacity as an employee of Stone Keys parent company,
Stone Key Group LLC (SKG), Mr. Urfirer receives a salary
from SKG which is not based on fees. In addition, in his
capacity as the holder of an interest in SKG, Mr. Urfirer
is entitled to a percentage of SKGs profits. The profits
interest in SKG held by Mr. Urfirer is not a fixed
percentage and will vary based on the revenues and expenses of
SKG, the operation of payment priorities in SKGs LLC
Agreement and potential future dilution. Under certain
scenarios, Mr. Urfirers interest in SKGs 2010
profits could be equal to but will in no event exceed 50% and
therefore, Mr. Urfirers share of the fee could
approximate $4.0 million, before considering related
operating costs and expenses.
Mr. Urfirer and Stone Keys other Co-Chairman and
Co-CEO hold personal investments in Aston Capital Partners, L.P.
as minority limited partners. Certain of our executive officers,
including Mr. LaPenta, Mr. DePalma, Mr. Paresi
and Ms. Fordyce, control Aston Capital Partners, L.P.
through their ownership interest in the general partner.
F-25
|
|
5.
|
LONG-TERM
DEBT AND FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
|
Long-term debt comprises the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$175.0 million aggregate principal amount
3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due May 15, 2027
|
|
$
|
175,000
|
|
|
$
|
175,000
|
|
Borrowings under revolving credit agreements
|
|
|
57,943
|
|
|
|
4,868
|
|
Borrowings under term loan
|
|
|
259,941
|
|
|
|
282,056
|
|
Capital leases and other
|
|
|
1,022
|
|
|
|
1,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
493,906
|
|
|
|
463,535
|
|
Less: Unamortized discount on convertible notes
|
|
|
8,359
|
|
|
|
13,991
|
|
Less: Unamortized original issue discount on term loan
|
|
|
2,084
|
|
|
|
3,178
|
|
Less: Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
271,401
|
|
|
|
27,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
212,062
|
|
|
$
|
419,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement, as amended, as
described below, the Company is required to use the Net Cash
Proceeds (as defined) from the sale the Intel Business to BAE to
make mandatory prepayments of amounts borrowed under the Credit
Agreement, first in reduction to the Term Loans and next in
reduction of revolving loans. Because the related assets held
for sale and corresponding liabilities are included in current
assets and liabilities the total amount outstanding under the
Term Loans, of $257.9 million, net of original issue
discount and $12.9 million of borrowings under the
revolving credit facility has been included in current
liabilities. The related deferred financing costs are included
in other assets. It is expected that upon this mandatory
prepayment of the Term Loans, the Company will record a loss on
the settlement of the debt of which is estimated to approximate
$7.4 million.
Concurrent with the consummation of the sale of the Intel
Business to BAE, approximately $289.3 million in debt was
repaid, including all of the term loans and $29.4 million
of borrowings under the revolving credit facility, which were
reduced to $56.2 million. After giving the effect to the
repayments described above, scheduled principal payments on
long-term debt and financing arrangements for the subsequent
three years are as follows: $0.6 million,
$203.9 million and $0.1 million. The Convertible
Notes final maturity date is 2027, but the holders have
the right to require the Company to repurchase the Notes at par
in 2012.
Credit
Agreement
On August 5, 2008, L-1 entered into a Second Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement (the Credit Agreement),
among L-1 Identity Operating, L-1, Bank of America, N.A.,
Wachovia Bank, National Association, Banc of America Securities
LLC and Wachovia Capital Markets LLC, Royal Bank of Canada,
Societe Generale and TD Bank, N.A. to amend and restate the
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, by and among L-1, Bank of
America, N.A. (Administrative Agent), Bear Stearns
Corporate Lending, Inc., Bear Stearns & Co., Inc.,
Banc of America Securities LLC, Wachovia Bank, N.A. and Credit
Suisse, Cayman Islands Branch. The Credit Agreement provides for
a senior secured term loan facility in an aggregate principal
amount of up to $300.0 million, with a term of five years,
and a senior secured revolving credit facility in an aggregate
principal amount of up to $135.0 million. The proceeds of
the senior secured facilities were used to (i) fund, in
part, the purchase price paid, and fees and expenses incurred,
in connection with L-1s acquisition of Digimarc
Corporation after giving effect to the spin-off of its digital
watermarking business (Old Digimarc),
(ii) repay borrowings under
L-1s
existing revolving credit facility and (iii) provide
ongoing working capital and fund other general corporate
purposes of L-1. As of December 31, 2010, the Company has
approximately $68.9 million available under its revolving
credit facility, subject to continuing compliance with the
covenants contained in the agreement.
On July 9, 2009, L-1 entered into an amendment to the
Credit Agreement pursuant to which the term loans under the
Credit Agreement have been split into two tranches: the
Tranche B-1
Term Loan and the
F-26
Tranche B-2
Term Loan. The
Tranche B-1
Term Loan, with an aggregate principal amount of approximately
$128.1 million at December 31, 2010, requires annual
principal payments (payable quarterly) of 10 percent of the
original principal amount through September 30, 2010,
20 percent of the original principal amount through
September 30, 2012, and thereafter increasing over the
duration of the Credit Agreement. The
Tranche B-2
Term Loan, with an aggregate principal amount of approximately
$131.8 million at December 31, 2010, requires annual
principal payments (also payable quarterly) of 1 percent of
the related original principal amounts over the remaining term
of the Credit Agreement. There were $57.9 million of
borrowings and $8.1 million of letters of credit that were
outstanding under the revolving credit facility, respectively,
at December 31, 2010. In February 2011, in connection with
the consummation of the BAE transaction, the term loans were
fully repaid and the borrowings under the revolving credit
facility were reduced to $56.2 million.
Under the terms of the amended senior secured credit facility,
the Company has the option to borrow at LIBOR (subject to a
floor of 3 percent) plus 2.75 percent to
5.0 percent per annum or at prime (subject to a floor of
2 percent) plus 1.75 percent to 4.0 percent per
annum. L-1 is required to pay a fee of 0.5 percent on the
unused portion of the revolving credit facility. All obligations
of L-1 Operating under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed on a
senior secured basis by L-1 and by each of L-1s existing
and subsequently acquired or organized direct or indirect
wholly-owned subsidiaries (subject to certain exceptions). At
December 31, 2010, the interest rates were
6.75 percent for
Tranche B-1
Term Loans, 7.25 percent for
Tranche B-2
Term Loans and 6.0 percent for borrowings under the
revolving credit facility.
L-1 is required to maintain the following financial covenants
under the Credit Agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Debt Service Coverage Ratio. As of the end of any
fiscal quarter, the ratio of Consolidated EBITDA (as defined in
the Credit Agreement) of L-1 Operating and its consolidated
subsidiaries for the period of four consecutive fiscal quarters
ending on or immediately prior to such date to the sum of
(i) Consolidated Interest Charges (as defined in the Credit
Agreement) of L-1 Operating and its consolidated subsidiaries
paid or payable in cash during the period of four consecutive
fiscal quarters ended on or immediately prior to such date, plus
(ii) Consolidated Debt Amortization (as defined in the
Credit Agreement) of L-1 Operating and its consolidated
subsidiaries as of such date, shall not be less than 2.25:1.00,
subject to the amendment described below.
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Leverage Ratio. As of the end of any fiscal
quarter, the ratio of L-1 Operatings Consolidated Funded
Indebtedness (as defined in the Credit Agreement, which excludes
standby letters of credit issued in connection with performance
bonds) as of such date to its Consolidated EBITDA (as defined in
the Credit Agreement) for the period of four consecutive fiscal
quarters ended on or immediately prior to such date, may not be
more than: (i) 3.25:1.00 from the Closing Date (as defined
in the Credit Agreement) to and including March 31, 2010,
(ii) 3.00:1.00 from March 31, 2010 to March 30,
2011, and (iii) 2.75:1.00 at the end of each fiscal quarter
thereafter, which has been amended as described below.
|
On August 30, 2010, L-1 entered into an amendment and
consent (the Third Amendment) to the Second Amended
and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of August 5, 2008,
among L-1 Identity Solutions Operating Company, the Company,
Bank of America, N.A., the Lenders party thereto, Wachovia Bank,
National Association, Banc of America Securities LLC and
Wachovia Capital Markets LLC (as amended, the Credit
Agreement). The Third Amendment extends the time period
during which previously modified financial covenants will apply
under the Credit Agreement, subject to the Company entering into
definitive agreements providing for the sale of all or
substantially all of the assets and operations of the Company
and its subsidiaries in connection with its strategic
alternatives review by September 30, 2010, which the
Company executed on September 19, 2010. The Third Amendment
provides that the minimum Consolidated Debt Service Coverage
Ratio of 1.65 to 1.00 will remain in effect for the third fiscal
quarter of 2010 and the period through and including
March 30, 2011, after which the minimum Consolidated Debt
Service Coverage Ratio shall return to 2.25 to 1.00 for each
fiscal quarter thereafter, and the maximum Consolidated Leverage
Ratio of 3.85 to 1.00 remain in effect for the third fiscal
quarter of 2010 and the period through and including
March 30, 2011, after which the maximum Consolidated
Leverage Ratio shall return to 2.75 to 1.00 for each fiscal
quarter thereafter. At December 31, 2010 the Companys
Consolidated Debt Service Coverage Ratio was
F-27
1.79:1.00 and the Consolidated Leverage Ratio was 3.50:1.00;
accordingly the Company was in compliance with the modified
financial covenants. On a pro forma basis giving effect to the
BAE sale and the repayment of long term debt as if it had
occurred on January 1, 2010, the pro forma debt service
coverage ratio would have been 6.40:1.00 and the pro forma
leverage ratio would have been 0.55:1.00.
Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, as amended, L-1
Operating may incur, assume or guarantee unsecured subordinated
indebtedness in an amount up to $200.0 million, provided
that no default or event of default shall have occurred or would
occur as a result of the incurrence of such subordinated debt
and the borrower and its subsidiaries are in pro forma
compliance, after giving effect to the incurrence of such
subordinated debt, with each of the covenants in the Credit
Agreement, including, without limitation, the financial
covenants described above.
Pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement, as amended, L-1
may incur, assume or guarantee any amount of unsecured
subordinated indebtedness, provided, that no default or event of
default shall have occurred or would occur as a result of the
incurrence of such subordinated debt and the pro forma
Consolidated Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement)
of L-1 and its subsidiaries after giving effect to the
incurrence of such subordinated debt shall be less than
4.75:1.00. The Credit Agreement limits the ability of L-1 to
(i) pay dividends or other distributions or repurchase
capital stock, (ii) create, incur, assume or suffer to
exist any indebtedness, (iii) create, incur, assume or
suffer to exist liens upon any of its property, assets or
revenues, (iv) sell, transfer, license, lease or otherwise
dispose of any property, (v) make or become legally
obligated to make capital expenditures above certain thresholds,
subject to certain permitted adjustments, (vi) make
investments, including acquisitions, and (vii) enter into
transactions with affiliates. These covenants are subject to a
number of exceptions and qualifications. The Credit Agreement
provides for customary events of default which include (subject
in certain cases to grace and cure periods), among others:
nonpayment, breach of covenants or other agreements in the
Credit Agreement or the other Loan Documents (as defined in the
Credit Agreement), payment defaults or acceleration of other
indebtedness, failure to pay certain judgments, inability to pay
debts as they become due and certain events of bankruptcy,
insolvency or reorganization.
If an event of default, including a change in control, occurs
(as defined in the Credit Agreement), the Administrative Agent
may, with the consent of the Required Lenders declare all
outstanding indebtedness including accrued and unpaid interest
under the Credit Agreement to be due and payable.
In October 2008, the Company entered into an interest rate
protection agreement to reduce its exposure to the variable
interest rate payments on its term loan. The interest rate
protection agreement has a notional amount of
$62.5 million, and expires in November, 2011. Under the
term of the agreement, the Company pays the counterparty a fixed
rate of 4.1 percent and receives variable interest based on
three-month LIBOR (subject to a floor of 3.0 percent). In
May 2009, the Company entered into two additional interest rate
protection agreements with notional amounts of
$50.0 million each pursuant to which the Company pays a
fixed rate of 1.4 percent and receives three month LIBOR.
The Company settled these agreements in February 2011.
Convertible
Senior Notes
On May 17, 2007, the Company issued $175.0 million of
Convertible Notes with a conversion feature which allows the
Company the option to settle the debt either in shares of common
stock or to settle the principal amount in cash and the
conversion spread in cash or common stock. The proceeds of the
Convertible Notes offering, net of deferred financing costs
amounted to $168.7 million. The embedded conversion feature
has not been deemed a derivative since the conversion feature is
indexed to the Companys stock and would be classified as
equity.
The Notes are governed by an indenture, dated May 17, 2007
(the Indenture), between the Company and The Bank of
New York, as trustee. The Notes will be convertible only under
certain circumstances, as described below. If, at the time of
conversion, the daily volume-weighted average price per share
for a 25 trading day period calculated in accordance with the
Indenture (as defined in greater detail in the Indenture,
VWAP) of the Companys common stock is less
than or equal to $32.00 per share, which is referred to as
F-28
the base conversion price, the Notes will be convertible into
31.25 shares of common stock of the Company per $1,000
principal amount of the Notes, subject to adjustment upon the
occurrence of certain events. If, at the time of conversion, the
VWAP of the shares of common stock of the Company exceeds the
base conversion price of $32.00 per share, the conversion rate
will be determined pursuant to a formula resulting in
holders receipt of up to an additional 14 shares of
common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the Notes, subject
to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events and
determined as set forth in the Indenture.
The Notes are convertible until the close of business on the
second business day immediately preceding May 15, 2027, in
multiples of $1,000 in principal amount, at the option of the
holder under the following circumstances: (1) during the
five
business-day
period after any five consecutive trading day period (the
measurement period) in which the trading price the
Note, for each day of such measurement period was less than
98 percent of the product of the last reported sale price
of shares of common stock of the Company and the applicable
conversion rate for such trading day; (2) during any fiscal
quarter, if the last reported sale price of shares of common
stock of the Company for 20 or more trading days in a period of
30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of
the immediately preceding calendar quarter is greater than or
equal to 130 percent of the base conversion price on the
related trading day; (3) if the Company calls any or all of
the Notes for redemption; and (4) upon the occurrence of
specified corporate transactions described in the Indenture.
Upon conversion, the Company has the right to deliver shares of
common stock based upon the applicable conversion rate, or a
combination of cash and shares of common stock, if any, based on
a daily conversion value as described above calculated on a
proportionate basis for each trading day of a 25
trading-day
observation period. In the event of a fundamental change as
specified in the Indenture, the Company will increase the
conversion rate by a number of additional shares of common stock
specified in the Indenture, or, in lieu thereof, the Company may
in certain circumstances elect to adjust the conversion rate and
related conversion obligation so that the Notes will become
convertible into shares of the acquiring or surviving company.
In connection with the Safran merger, the Company delivered a
conversion price notice to the holders of the Convertible Notes
as required under the indenture. It is expected that the
conversion price will be equal to the base conversion price. The
Notes will not become convertible into shares of Safran in
connection with the merger.
The Notes bear interest at a rate of 3.75 percent per year
payable semiannually in arrears in cash on May 15 and November
15 of each year. The Notes will mature on May 15, 2027,
unless earlier converted, redeemed or repurchased. The Company
may redeem the Notes at its option, in whole or in part, on or
after May 20, 2012, subject to prior notice as provided in
the Indenture. The redemption price during that period will be
equal to the principal amount of the Notes to be redeemed, plus
any accrued and unpaid interest. The holders can require the
Company to repurchase the Notes for cash on May 15, 2012,
May 15, 2017 and May 15, 2020. The embedded redemption
and repurchase provisions have not been separated from the host
contracts and accounted for as derivatives because such embedded
derivatives are deemed to be clearly and closely related to the
host contract.
The Convertible Notes are structurally subordinated to all
liabilities of L-1 Operating. Under the term of the Credit
Agreement, as defined above, L-1 Operating may not make any
dividend payment to the Company except to permit the Company to
make scheduled interest payments on the subordinated debt up to
a maximum of $10.0 million per year, and certain tax
liabilities. However, subject to certain prepayment requirements
under the Credit Agreement, the Company may prepay, redeem or
repurchase the Convertible Notes in amounts not in excess of
proceeds from the issuance of additional equity securities of
the Company.
Upon consummation of any share exchange, consolidation or merger
of L-1 pursuant to which its common stock will be converted into
cash, securities or other property or any sale, lease or other
transfer in one transaction or a series of transactions of all
or substantially all of L-1s and L-1s
subsidiaries assets, taken as a whole, to any person other
than one of its subsidiaries, the holders of the Convertible
Notes can convert the Notes or require the Company to repurchase
all outstanding debt at a purchase price equal to
100 percent of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid
interest. It is expected that the holder of the Notes will
exercise their rights to require the Company to purchase the
Notes upon closing of the consummation of the merger of the
Company with Safran.
F-29
Common
Stock and Warrants
On December 16, 2005, in accordance with the terms of the
Investment Agreement between L-1 and L-1 Investment Partners LLC
dated October 5, 2005, L-1 sold to Aston
7,619,047 shares of L-1 common stock warrants to purchase
an aggregate of 1,600,000 shares of L-1 common stock at an
exercise price of $13.75 per share which expired in December
2008 for aggregate gross proceeds to L-1 of $100.0 million.
In connection with the merger with Identix, the Company assumed
Identix obligation under a warrant which was issued in
exchange for the technology and intellectual property rights
acquired by Identix. The warrant was issued with contingent
future vesting rights to purchase up to 378,400 shares of
common stock at $9.94 per share. The fair value of the warrant
at the time of vesting will be recorded as additional cost of
the acquisition of Identix. The warrant vests upon successful
issuance of certain patents with the U.S. government
related to the technology acquired. As of December 31,
2010, 141,900 warrants were vested of which all have been
exercised, and 236,500 remain unvested. The warrants expire in
2014.
In connection with Identix merger with Visionics in 2002,
the Company also assumed warrants to purchase shares of
Visionics common stock outstanding immediately prior to the
consummation of the merger, which were converted into warrants
to purchase shares of Identix common stock. The remaining
warrants to purchase 38,789 shares of common stock of the
Company will expire once it fulfills its registration
obligations, and have exercise prices between $20.78 and $26.53.
Prepaid
Forward Contract
In connection with the issuance of the Convertible Notes on
May 17, 2007, the Company entered into a contract with Bear
Stearns (subsequently acquired by JP Morgan Chase &
Co.) to purchase 3,490,400 shares of the Companys
common stock at a purchase price of $20.00 per share. Under the
agreement, Bear Stearns is required to deliver the shares to the
Company in April-May 2012. At closing of the Convertible Notes,
the Company settled its obligation under the pre-paid forward
contract to Bear Stearns for cash of $69.8 million. The
fair value of the obligation (which was equal to the cash paid)
has been accounted for as a repurchase of common stock and as a
reduction of equity. Under terms of the contract, any dividend
payment that Bear Stearns would otherwise be entitled to on the
common stock during the term of the contract would be paid to
the Company. Effective January 26, 2011, JP Morgan and the
Company entered into a termination agreement and JP Morgan
delivered the 3,490,400 shares to the Company.
Issuance
of Equity Securities
On August 5, 2008, pursuant to the terms and conditions of
(i) the Securities Purchase Agreement, by and between L-1
and Robert V. LaPenta (the LaPenta Agreement),
(ii) the Securities Purchase Agreement (the Iridian
Agreement), by and between L-1 and Iridian Asset
Management LLC (Iridian) and (iii) the LRSR LLC
Agreement (together with the LaPenta Agreement and Iridian
Agreement, the Investor Agreements), L-1 issued an
aggregate of 8,083,472 shares of L-1 common stock and
15,107 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
(the Series A Preferred Stock) for aggregate
proceeds to L-1 of $119.0 million, net of related issuance
costs, which were used to fund a portion of L-1s
acquisition of Old Digimarc. In accordance with its terms, the
Series A Preferred Stock was subsequently converted to
1,310,992 shares of common stock. See Note 4 for
additional information.
7. STOCK
OPTIONS AND RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS
Stock
Option Plans
On May 5, 2010 and May 7, 2008, the Companys
shareholders approved the L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc. 2010 and
2008 Long-Term Incentive Plans, under which 2.5 million and
2.0 million shares, respectively, are available for awards
to employees, consultants and directors. Shares remaining
available for issuance under the Companys 2005 Long-Term
Incentive Plan carried over to, and became available for future
awards under, the Companys 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
F-30
The following is a description of the other stock-based
incentive plans for which stock awards are outstanding. The 1996
Viisage Management Stock Option Plan and the 1996 Viisage
Director Stock Option Plan (the Option Plans) permit
the Board of Directors to grant incentive and nonqualified stock
options to employees and officers and nonqualified stock options
to directors. In 2005, the Company adopted the 2005 Long-Term
Incentive Plan (the 2005 Plan), which provides for
the issuance of non-qualified stock options and incentive stock
options, as well as stock purchase rights, stock appreciation
rights and long-term performance awards to eligible employees,
officers and directors. Incentive stock options are granted at
fair market value and are subject to the requirements of
Section 422 of the Options generally vest on an annual
basis over a period of four years. Options granted under the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Nonqualified options
are granted at exercise prices determined by the Board of
Directors. To date, options granted to directors have vested
either immediately or between one to four years from the date of
grant. Options granted to officers and employees generally vest
over four years or, in limited circumstances, earlier if certain
performance criteria are achieved. All options granted under
these plans expire ten years from the date of grant. In 2001,
the Company adopted the 2001 Stock in Lieu of Cash Compensation
for the Directors Plan to compensate non-employee members
of the Board of Directors. This plan allows directors to elect
to receive their board compensation in cash or stock. Both the
1996 Viisage. Management Stock Option Plan and the Viisage
1996 Director Stock Option Plan expired and no new shares
are available to grant from these plans.
In connection with the ZN Vision Technologies AG
(ZN) acquisition on January 23, 2004, the
Company assumed ZNs Employee Share Option Plan. The
options under this plan were fully vested prior to the
consummation of the acquisition. As part of the Imaging
Automation, Inc. (iA) acquisition on October 5,
2004, the Company assumed the 2003 Imaging Automation Plan and
the 1996 Imaging Automation plan. Options previously issued
under the plans were fully vested as of the close of the
transaction. In connection with the acquisition of Bioscrypt,
the Company assumed options outstanding under the Bioscrypt
Stock Plan which vest according to terms of that Plan.
In connection with the merger with Identix in 2006, the Company
assumed all of the then outstanding options granted under the
Identix Incorporated 2002 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2002
Plan), the Identix Incorporated New Employee Stock
Incentive Plan, the 2000 Identix Incorporated Non-Employee
Directors Stock Option Plan, the Identix Incorporated Equity
Incentive Plan, the Visionics Corporation 1990 Stock Option
Plan, the Visionics Corporation 1998 Stock Option Plan, and the
Visionics Corporation Stock Incentive Plan based on the exchange
ratio of 0.473. The 2002 Plan will expire in 2012 and provides
for the discretionary award of options, restricted stock, stock
purchase rights, performance shares or any combination of these
awards to L-1 eligible employees, and non-employee directors and
consultants. Options generally vest on an annual basis over a
period of four years. Options granted under the Identix
Incorporated New Employee Stock Incentive Plan, which will
expire in 2010, generally vest on an annual basis over a period
of four years. Options granted under the Identix Non-Employee
Directors Stock Award Plan vest over one year. Options granted
under the 2002 Identix Incorporated Equity Incentive Plan
generally vest over a four year period.
F-31
Details of the stock options available for grant and outstanding
by stock option plan are set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
for
|
|
|
options
|
|
Stock Plan
|
|
grant
|
|
|
outstanding
|
|
|
2010 L-1 Identity Solutions Long-Term Incentive Plan
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 and 2005 L-1 Identity Solutions Long-Term Incentive Plan
|
|
|
571,349
|
|
|
|
3,485,703
|
|
Bioscrypt Stock Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,898
|
|
Identix Incorporated 2002 Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
|
182,193
|
|
|
|
2,144,455
|
|
ZN Employee Share Option Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,456
|
|
2003 Imaging Automation Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
1996 Imaging Automation Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
688
|
|
1996 Viisage Directors Stock Option Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,001
|
|
1996 Viisage Management Stock Option Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295,341
|
|
2000 Identix Incorporated New Employee Stock Incentive Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
338,890
|
|
Identix Incorporated Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372,112
|
|
Visionics Corporation 1998 Stock Option Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,829
|
|
Identix Incorporated Non Employee Directors Stock option Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,253,542
|
|
|
|
7,129,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
Options
The following table summarizes the stock option activity under
all plans from January 1, 2010 through December 31,
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2010
|
|
|
8,091,652
|
|
|
$
|
13.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
38,500
|
|
|
|
8.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(235,491
|
)
|
|
|
3.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled/expired/forfeited
|
|
|
(765,523
|
)
|
|
|
18.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
7,129,138
|
|
|
$
|
13.28
|
|
|
|
5.76
|
|
|
$
|
10,102,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
5,567,857
|
|
|
$
|
13.28
|
|
|
|
5.76
|
|
|
$
|
7,889,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
5,362,177
|
|
|
$
|
14.16
|
|
|
|
5.05
|
|
|
$
|
4,681,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options expected to vest are determined by applying the
pre-vesting forfeiture rate assumptions to total outstanding
options.
F-32
The following table summarizes information concerning
outstanding and exercisable stock options as of
December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Range of Exercise Price
|
|
As of 12/31/10
|
|
|
Life (Years)
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
As of 12/31/10
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
$0.03 $0.03
|
|
|
177,456
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
177,456
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
0.16 7.23
|
|
|
869,986
|
|
|
|
8.64
|
|
|
|
7.21
|
|
|
|
221,611
|
|
|
|
7.18
|
|
7.30 9.34
|
|
|
777,346
|
|
|
|
7.69
|
|
|
|
7.70
|
|
|
|
220,910
|
|
|
|
7.86
|
|
9.53 12.22
|
|
|
791,828
|
|
|
|
3.28
|
|
|
|
11.20
|
|
|
|
786,828
|
|
|
|
11.19
|
|
12.40 14.52
|
|
|
676,264
|
|
|
|
3.70
|
|
|
|
13.56
|
|
|
|
585,014
|
|
|
|
13.49
|
|
14.55 14.55
|
|
|
1,170,000
|
|
|
|
5.66
|
|
|
|
14.55
|
|
|
|
1,170,000
|
|
|
|
14.55
|
|
14.78 16.43
|
|
|
923,197
|
|
|
|
5.44
|
|
|
|
15.86
|
|
|
|
826,447
|
|
|
|
15.87
|
|
16.55 18.46
|
|
|
733,744
|
|
|
|
5.80
|
|
|
|
17.63
|
|
|
|
581,369
|
|
|
|
17.59
|
|
18.84 20.01
|
|
|
969,006
|
|
|
|
6.10
|
|
|
|
19.48
|
|
|
|
755,231
|
|
|
|
19.45
|
|
20.06 58.25
|
|
|
40,311
|
|
|
|
2.96
|
|
|
|
22.99
|
|
|
|
37,311
|
|
|
|
23.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
7,129,138
|
|
|
|
5.76
|
|
|
$
|
13.28
|
|
|
|
5,362,177
|
|
|
$
|
14.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate unearned compensation cost of unvested options
outstanding as of December 31, 2010 was $8.6 million
and will be amortized over a weighted average period of
1.9 years. The total intrinsic value of options exercised
in the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 was
$1.5 million, $0.2 million, and $2.6 million,
respectively. The intrinsic value is calculated as the
difference between the market value of the Companys common
stock and the exercise price of options.
The fair value of option grants is determined using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted
average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Expected annual dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
56.2
|
%
|
|
|
59.3
|
%
|
|
|
51.9
|
%
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
Fair value of options
|
|
$
|
4.58
|
|
|
$
|
4.42
|
|
|
$
|
7.62
|
|
The Company currently has no history or expectation of paying
cash dividends on its common stock. The expected volatility rate
is based on the historical volatility of the Companys
common stock. In the second quarter of 2007, the Company
reviewed the historical volatility of its common stock and began
using a weighted average method that more accurately reflects
volatility. The expected life of options are calculated pursuant
to the guidance from Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 107. The Company estimated forfeitures
are based on historical rates. The risk free interest rate is
based on the applicable treasury security whose term
approximates the expected life of the options. The Company
updates these assumptions on at least an annual basis and on an
interim basis if significant changes to the assumptions are
determined to be necessary.
Restricted
Shares
During 2010 and 2009, the Company awarded 419,787 and
1,650,750 shares, respectively, of restricted stock to
officers, directors and employees and had total outstanding
restricted stock awards of 1,499,564 as of December 31,
2010. The restricted stock vests over four years and the
weighted average grant date fair value was $7.40 at
December 31, 2010. At December 31, 2010, approximately
1,171,000 shares are expected to vest based on the
estimated forfeiture rate. Unearned compensation related to
restricted stock that is expected to vest
F-33
approximated $5.4 million at December 31, 2010 and is
expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
2.6 years. Restricted stock expected to vest are determined
by applying the pre-vesting forfeiture rate assumptions to total
outstanding restricted stock awards.
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
In August 2006, the Companys shareholders approved the
2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan which made available 500,000
new shares for future issuance. In May 2008, the Companys
shareholders approved an additional 2,000,000 shares made
available under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Shares issued
under this plan were 295,269, 485,249 and 297,724 in 2010, 2009,
and 2008, respectively. The purchase price is determined by
taking the lower of 85 percent of the closing price on the
first or last day of periods defined by the plan. In connection
with the merger agreement with Safran, issuances of the Plan
have been suspended.
Cash received from stock option exercises and purchases of
shares under the employee purchase plan was $2.9 million,
$2.6 million and $5.5 million in the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
|
|
8.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
Leases
The Company leases certain equipment and facilities used in its
operations under non-cancelable operating leases. Rental expense
for operating leases related to continuing operations for the
years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was
approximately $9.1 million, $8.7 million and
$6.8 million, respectively. Rental expense for operating
leases related to discontinued operations for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was approximately
$1.5 million, $1.4 million and $1.3 million,
respectively.
In addition, the Company had capital lease obligations of
$0.4 million and inventory purchase commitments of
$1.0 million at December 31, 2010 all of which is
related to continuing operations.
At December 31, 2010, approximate future minimum rentals
under the operating leases, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
6,380
|
|
|
$
|
1,361
|
|
2012
|
|
|
5,899
|
|
|
|
783
|
|
2013
|
|
|
5,105
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
2014
|
|
|
4,637
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
2015
|
|
|
3,348
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
2,807
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
28,176
|
|
|
$
|
2,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
Currency Contracts
Hardware and consumables purchases related to contracts
associated with the U.S. Department of State are
denominated in Japanese Yen. The Company utilized foreign
currency forward contracts to settle obligations denominated in
Japanese Yen and at December 31, 2010 these Japanese Yen
denominated liabilities aggregated $2.9 million.
F-34
Putative
Shareholder Class Action Litigation
The Company was named as a defendant in five putative
shareholder class actions filed in the Superior Court of
Connecticut, Judicial District of Stamford-Norwalk at Stamford,
arising out of the transactions with Safran and BAE pursuant to
the Merger Agreement and BAE Purchase Agreement. The actions
were captioned: Michael Palma v. Robert LaPenta et
al., CV-10-6006781-S (Conn. Super. Ct.), Barry P.
Kranz, Jr. v. L-1 Identity Solutions et al.,
CV-10-6006760-S (Conn. Super. Ct.), Michael Matteo v.
L-1 Identity Solutions et al., CV-10-6006759-S (Conn. Super.
Ct.), Dart Seasonal Products Retirement Plan v. L-1
Identity Solutions et al., CV-10-6006835-S (Conn. Super.
Ct.), and George F. Chrisman v. Robert LaPenta et al.,
CV-10-6006886-S (Conn. Super. Ct.) (collectively, the
Shareholder Actions).
The plaintiffs in the Shareholder Actions generally alleged the
members of the L-1 Board of Directors and certain officers of
the Company breached their fiduciary duties to shareholders by,
among other things, allegedly failing to receive maximum value
for their shares, failing to conduct an appropriate sale process
and agreeing to certain terms in the proposed merger agreement
with Safran that allegedly discourage competing offers from
other potential bidders
and/or
benefit defendants. The Shareholder Actions generally alleged
that the Company aided and abetted these alleged breaches of
fiduciary duty. Certain of the suits also alleged claims against
Safran, Merger Sub, BAE and BAE Systems, Inc. (the parent entity
to BAE and the U.S. affiliate of BAE Systems plc) for
aiding and abetting the foregoing alleged breaches of fiduciary
duty. The Shareholder Actions generally sought preliminary and
permanent relief, including, among other things, permission to
proceed as a class action, declaratory relief declaring that
defendants have breached their fiduciary duties, an injunction
enjoining the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement
and BAE Purchase Agreement, rescissionary damages in the event
that the Transactions are consummated, costs and attorneys
and experts fees.
On December 1, 2010, the plaintiffs reported that they had
agreed on a lead counsel and lead plaintiff structure whereby
the Matteo, Kranz & Dart Seasonal Products Retirement
Plan plaintiffs became co-lead plaintiffs and their counsel
co-lead counsel. On December 3, 2010, the Court entered an
order consolidating the actions and appointing a leadership
structure consisting of Kranz and Dart Seasonal Products
Retirement Plan as Lead Plaintiffs, the law firms of Robbins
Umeda LLP and Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP as
Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs, and the law firms of Wofsey
Rosen Kweskin Kuriansky, LLP and Diserio Martin
OConnor & Castiglioni LLP as Co-Liaison Counsel
for Plaintiffs. The caption for the consolidated cases is: In
re L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc. Shareholder Litigation, Lead
Case
No. X05-FST-CVIO-6006759-S.
On December 6, 2010, Lead Plaintiffs filed a Motion for
Limited Expedited Discovery and for a Briefing and Hearing
Schedule on Plaintiffs Anticipated Motion for Equitable
Relief and Objection to Defendants Request for Extension
of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs Discovery Requests in the
Court. On December 10 and 13, 2010, the Company and the other
defendants (except the BAE defendants who had already filed
motions to strike and to stay), respectively, filed motions to
strike the Complaint and motions to stay discovery pending
adjudication of the motions to strike and objections to Lead
Plaintiffs motion to expedite discovery.
On December 15, 2010, after arms length negotiations,
the parties entered into a memorandum of understanding
(MOU) to settle the litigation, which will be
memorialized in a final settlement agreement to be submitted to
the Court for approval. Pursuant to the MOU, the Company agreed
to make certain additional disclosures in the Final Proxy.
Additionally, pursuant to the MOU, the plaintiffs will be
afforded the opportunity to conduct confirmatory discovery
sufficient to confirm the fairness and reasonableness of the
terms of the final settlement agreement.
The Company continues to vigorously deny any and all liability
with respect to the facts and claims alleged in the action.
F-35
Old
Digimarc Litigation
In connection with the Companys August 2008 acquisition of
Old Digimarc, which consisted of its Secure ID Business
following the spin-off of its digital watermarking business, the
Company assumed certain legal proceedings of Old Digimarc as
described below.
Beginning in May 2001, a number of substantially identical class
action complaints alleging violations of the federal securities
laws were filed in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York naming approximately
300 companies, including Old Digimarc, certain officers and
directors and certain underwriters of the companies
initial public offerings as defendants. The complaints were
subsequently consolidated into a single action, and a
consolidated amended complaint was filed in April 2002. The
amended complaint alleges, among other things, that the
underwriters of Old Digimarcs initial public offering
violated securities laws by failing to disclose certain alleged
compensation arrangements in Old Digimarcs initial public
offering registration statement and by engaging in manipulative
practices to artificially inflate the price of Old
Digimarcs stock in the aftermarket subsequent to the
initial public offering. Old Digimarc and certain of its
officers and directors are named in the amended complaint
pursuant to Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 10(b) and
Rule 10b-5
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on the basis of an
alleged failure to disclose the underwriters alleged
compensation arrangements and manipulative practices. The
complaint sought unspecified damages. In July 2002, the claims
against Old Digimarc under Section 10(b) were dismissed. In
October 2002, the individual officer and director defendants
were dismissed without prejudice pursuant to tolling agreements.
Subsequent addenda to these tolling agreements extended the
tolling period through August 27, 2010. In June 2004, a
stipulation of partial settlement among the plaintiffs, the
companies, and the officers and directors was submitted to the
District Court. While the partial settlement was pending
approval, the plaintiffs continued to litigate their claims
against the underwriter defendants. The district court directed
that the litigation proceed within a number of focus
cases rather than in all of the 309 cases that had been
consolidated. Old Digimarc was not one of these focus cases. In
October 2004, the district court certified the focus cases as
class actions. The underwriter defendants appealed that ruling
and, on December 5, 2006, the Court of Appeals for the
Second Circuit reversed the district courts class
certification decision for the six focus cases. In light of the
Second Circuit opinion, in June 2007, the district court entered
an order terminating the settlement. On August 14, 2007,
the plaintiffs filed their second consolidated amended class
action complaints against the focus cases and on
September 27, 2007, again moved for class certification. On
November 12, 2007, certain of the defendants in the focus
cases moved to dismiss the second consolidated amended class
action complaints. The court issued an opinion and order on
March 26, 2008, denying the motions to dismiss except as to
Section 11 claims raised by those plaintiffs who sold their
securities for a price in excess of the initial offering price
and those who purchased outside the previously certified class
period. The class certification motion was withdrawn without
prejudice on October 10, 2008. On April 2, 2009, a
stipulation and agreement of settlement among the plaintiffs,
issuer defendants (including Old Digimarc) and underwriter
defendants was submitted to the Court for preliminary approval.
Old Digimarcs portion of the settlement, which is wholly
immaterial, is covered entirely by insurance.
On June 10, 2009, the Judge granted preliminary approval of
the settlement, and on October 5, 2009, the Judge granted
final approval of the settlement. On August 26, 2010, based
on the expiration of the tolling period stated in the tolling
agreements with the individual officers and directors, the
plaintiffs filed a Notice of Termination of Tolling Agreement
and Recommencement of Litigation against the named officers and
directors. The plaintiffs stated to the Court that they do not
intend to take any further action against the named officers and
directors at this time. Notices of appeal of the opinion
granting final approval were filed by six groups of appellants.
In October 2010, four of the groups of appellants withdrew their
appeals with prejudice. Plaintiffs have moved to dismiss with
prejudice one of the remaining appeals based on alleged
violations of the Second Circuits rules, including failure
to serve, falsifying proofs of service, and failure to include
citations to the record, and moved to dismiss the other appeal
based on alleged lack of standing. It is unclear when the Second
Circuit will rule on these motions.
On October 10, 2007, an Old Digimarc shareholder filed a
lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Western
District of Washington against several companies that acted as
lead underwriters for the Old Digimarc initial public offering.
The complaint, which also named Old Digimarc as a nominal
defendant but
F-36
did not assert any claims against Old Digimarc, asserted claims
against the underwriters under Section 16(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On February 28, 2008, an
amended complaint was filed, with Old Digimarc still named only
as a nominal defendant. Similar complaints have been filed by
this same plaintiff against a number of other issuers in
connection with their initial public offerings, and the factual
allegations are closely related to the allegations in the
litigation pending in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York which is described above.
On March 12, 2009, after considering motions to dismiss,
one filed by thirty moving issuers and the other filed by the
underwriters, the judge dismissed the plaintiffs claims on
a jurisdictional and statute of limitations basis. On
April 10, 2009, the plaintiff filed a notice of appeal of
the dismissal. The final appellate brief was filed on
November 17, 2009; and oral argument was heard by the Ninth
Circuit Court of Appeals on October 5, 2010.
On December 2, 2010, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
affirmed the District Courts decision to dismiss the
moving issuers cases (including the Companys) on the
grounds that plaintiffs demand letters were insufficient
to put the issuers on notice of the claims asserted against them
and further ordered that the dismissals be made with prejudice.
The Ninth Circuit, however, reversed and remanded the District
Courts decision on the underwriter motion to dismiss
as to the claims arising from the non-moving issuers IPOs,
finding plaintiffs claims were not time-barred under the
applicable statute of limitations. In remanding, the Ninth
Circuit advised the non-moving issuers and underwriters to file
in the District Court the same challenges to plaintiffs
demand letters that moving issuers had filed.
On December 16, 2010, underwriters filed a petition for
panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc. Appellant
Vanessa Simmonds also filed a petition for rehearing en banc. On
January 18, 2011, the Ninth Circuit denied the petition for
rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc. It further
ordered that no further petitions for rehearing may be filed.
On January 24, 2011, the underwriters filed a motion to
stay the issuance of the Ninth Circuits mandate in the
cases involving the non-moving issuers. On January 25,
2011, the Ninth Circuit granted the underwriters motion
and ordered that the mandate in the cases involving the
non-moving issuers is stayed for ninety days pending the filing
of a petition for writ of certiorari in the United States
Supreme Court. On January 26, 2011, Appellant Vanessa
Simmonds moved to join the underwriters motion and
requested the Ninth Circuit stay the mandate in all cases. On
January 26, 2011, the Ninth Circuit granted
Appellants motion and ruled that the mandate in all cases
(including the Companys and other moving issuers) is
stayed for ninety days pending Appellants filing of a
petition for writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme
Court. The Company currently believes that the outcome of this
litigation will not have a material adverse impact on its
condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations
and cash flows.
Patent
Litigation
On May 12, 2010, the Company was served with a complaint in
the U.S. District Court, District of Delaware, alleging
patent infringement of US Patent No. 5,913,542 regarding
the making, using, offering for sale and selling of ID cards,
including drivers licenses. On August 19, 2010, the
Company filed an amended answer to the complaint, which
contained counterclaims for declaratory judgment against the
plaintiff. The Court has set a trial date of June 11, 2012.
Based on the preliminary nature of the proceedings, it is not
possible at this stage to quantify the potential damages,
exposure or liability to L-1, if any.
Other
The Company records a liability for any claim, demand,
litigation and other contingency when management believes that
it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and can
reasonably estimate the amount of the potential loss. Based on
current information and belief, the Company believes it has
adequate provisions for any such matters. The Company reviews
these provisions quarterly and adjusts these provisions to
reflect the impact of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice
of legal counsel and other information and events pertaining to
a particular matter. However, because of the inherent
uncertainties of litigation the ultimate outcome of certain
litigation cannot be accurately predicted by the Company; it is
therefore possible
F-37
that the consolidated financial position, results of operations
or cash flows of the Company could be materially adversely
affected in any particular period by the unfavorable resolution
of one or more of these matters and contingencies.
The Company established the L-1 401(k) plan on January 1,
2003. Participants are fully vested in their contributions and
vest 25 percent per year in L-1s contributions. The
Company also has assumed plans in connection with its
acquisitions of which one has not been merged into the L-1
401(k) plan as of December 31, 2010. Company contributions
on the one assumed plan that is not yet merged vests immediately
and is related to discontinued operations. The plans permit
pretax contributions by participants of up to the annual
Internal Revenue Service dollar limit. The Company may make
discretionary contributions to the plans in cash or common stock
subject to certain limitations. The costs for these plans
included in continuing operations were approximately
$2.4 million, $2.1 million, and $1.6 million in
2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. The costs for these plans
included in discontinued operations were approximately
$7.9 million, $7.4 million, and $6.6 million in
2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. In connection with the
merger agreement with Safran, the Company agreed not to make
contributions in common stock after December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Pretax loss of continuing operations comprises the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
(35,458
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,696
|
)
|
|
$
|
(530,860
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
5,229
|
|
|
|
3,256
|
|
|
|
(16,806
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(30,229
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,440
|
)
|
|
$
|
(547,666
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The (benefit) provision for income taxes related to continuing
operations comprises the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
328
|
|
|
$
|
471
|
|
State
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
805
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
803
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
1,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(10,458
|
)
|
|
|
(1,425
|
)
|
|
|
(39,524
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
(1,597
|
)
|
|
|
(563
|
)
|
|
|
(4,770
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
1,208
|
|
|
|
1,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,026
|
)
|
|
|
(780
|
)
|
|
|
(42,301
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(9,017
|
)
|
|
|
(1,048
|
)
|
|
|
48,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(20,215
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,325
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company is subject to income tax examinations by
U.S. Federal and other jurisdictions for tax years ended
subsequent to December 31, 2005. However, the
Companys loss carryforwards are subject to adjustment by
state and federal tax authorities in years the loss
carryforwards are used to reduce taxable income. The Company
believes that its income tax filing positions and deductions
will be sustained on audit and does not anticipate any
adjustments that will result in a material adverse effect on the
Companys financial
F-38
condition, results of operations, or cash flows. Therefore, no
reserves for uncertain income tax positions have been recorded.
The consolidated financial statements do not include any
material provision for interest or penalties. The Company has
made an election to account for interest expense and penalties
related to income tax issues as income tax expense.
A reconciliation of the federal statutory rate to the
Companys effective tax rate for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Federal benefit statutory rate
|
|
|
(34.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(34.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(34.0
|
)%
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.7
|
|
State and local taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
|
(18.5
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(29.4
|
)
|
|
|
(43.0
|
)
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
Foreign rate differential
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Permanent and other items
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
24.9
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
(66.9
|
)%
|
|
|
(54.3
|
)%
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets (liabilities):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
185,224
|
|
|
$
|
187,363
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
8,610
|
|
|
|
(6,635
|
)
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
(8,801
|
)
|
|
|
(13,842
|
)
|
Accruals and other reserves
|
|
|
9,934
|
|
|
|
12,927
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
15,694
|
|
|
|
12,415
|
|
Tax deductible goodwill amortization
|
|
|
(11,439
|
)
|
|
|
(18,842
|
)
|
Convertible notes
|
|
|
(3,107
|
)
|
|
|
(5,200
|
)
|
Tax credits
|
|
|
6,200
|
|
|
|
6,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
202,315
|
|
|
|
174,577
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(128,199
|
)
|
|
|
(136,330
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
74,116
|
|
|
$
|
38,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
40,881
|
|
|
$
|
11,514
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
33,235
|
|
|
|
26,733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
74,116
|
|
|
$
|
38,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets related to discontinued operations were
$1.3 million and $1.3 million at December 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively. Deferred tax liabilities related to
discontinued operations were $17.0 million and
$14.0 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
The increase in net deferred tax assets during 2010 is primarily
attributable to the generation of a taxable loss in the current
year and a reduction of a valuation allowance due to additional
expected net operating loss utilization in 2011 as a result of
the sale of the Intel Business to BAE offset by lower assumed
taxable income from continuing operations.
At December 31, 2010, the Company has available net
operating loss carryforwards for federal tax purposes of
approximately $477.2 million which may be used to reduce
future taxable income and includes $12.7 million of tax
deductions related to stock option exercises the tax benefit of
which have not been recognized. Substantially all of these
carryforwards are subject to limitations pursuant to the change
in control
F-39
provisions of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. The
Company has made an analysis of these limitations and recorded
deferred tax assets only to the extent these net operating loss
carryforwards can be realized during the carryforward period.
These carryforwards expire from 2011 through 2030. In addition,
the Company has $145.2 million of deductible goodwill, of
which $46.4 million relates to continuing operations.
During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008,
the Company recorded tax charges related to the exercise of
stock options and vested restricted stock of $2.0 million,
$0.8 million and $0.3 million, respectively, as a
reduction of paid in capital, and in 2010 and 2008, tax benefits
of $0.1 million and $0.5 million, respectively, as a
reduction of goodwill. The utilization of tax benefits related
to stock options and restricted stock is determined based on
ordering required by the relevant tax regulations.
|
|
12.
|
SEGMENT
AND GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION
|
Operating segments are defined as components of a company whose
operating results are regularly reviewed by the chief operating
decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and assess
performance. The Companys chief operating decision maker
is its Chief Executive Officer. The Companys operating
segments have been aggregated in two reportable segments:
Solutions and Services. The Solutions reportable segment
provides solutions that enable governments, law enforcement
agencies, and businesses to enhance security, reduce identity
theft, and protect personal privacy utilizing secure credential
provisioning and authentication systems, biometric technology
and the creation, enhancement
and/or
utilization of identity databases. Prior to September 19,
2010 the Services reportable segment provided fingerprinting
services to government, civil, and commercial customers, as well
as information technology and security consulting services to
U.S. Government agencies. As a result of presenting the
information technology and security consulting services as
discontinued operations the Services segment now solely consists
of fingerprinting services. Accordingly, all prior segment data
has retroactively revised to conform the data to the current
presentation.
The Company measures segment performance primarily based on
revenues and operating income (loss), Adjusted EBITDA and
unlevered free cash flow. Operating results by segment,
including allocation of corporate expenses, for the years ended
December 31, 20010, 2009, and 2008 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Solutions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
331,989
|
|
|
$
|
322,512
|
|
|
$
|
280,045
|
|
Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
(8,629
|
)
|
|
|
12,509
|
|
|
|
(534,779
|
)
|
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
|
|
|
34,484
|
|
|
|
29,593
|
|
|
|
41,051
|
|
Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
118,139
|
|
|
|
114,617
|
|
|
|
78,094
|
|
Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
(4,237
|
)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
|
|
|
4,009
|
|
|
|
2,927
|
|
|
|
2,751
|
|
Consolidated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
450,128
|
|
|
|
437,129
|
|
|
|
358,139
|
|
Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
(12,866
|
)
|
|
|
12,550
|
|
|
|
(534,397
|
)
|
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
|
|
|
38,493
|
|
|
|
32,520
|
|
|
|
43,802
|
|
Included in the Solutions segment results are asset impairments
and merger related expenses of $527.2 million and
$1.1 million, respectively for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and the Services segment includes asset
impairments of $1.4 million. In 2010 and 2009, the
Solutions reportable segment includes a provision of
$2.9 million and $1.2 million, respectively, related
to the suspension of the Registered Traveler Program. In 2010,
the Solutions and Services segments include allocated strategic
alternative costs of $9.7 million and $1.4 million, respectively.
F-40
Total assets by segment as of December 31, 2010 and 2009
are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Solutions
|
|
$
|
935,305
|
|
|
$
|
896,208
|
|
Services
|
|
|
97,032
|
|
|
|
99,792
|
|
Discontinued Operations
|
|
|
271,290
|
|
|
|
272,945
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
89,229
|
|
|
|
54,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
1,392,856
|
|
|
$
|
1,323,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate assets consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents,
deferred financing costs and net deferred tax assets.
Continuing operations revenues by market for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
State and Local
|
|
$
|
259,017
|
|
|
$
|
237,463
|
|
|
$
|
174,208
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
164,266
|
|
|
|
172,649
|
|
|
|
158,452
|
|
Commercial/Emerging Markets
|
|
|
26,845
|
|
|
|
27,017
|
|
|
|
25,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
450,128
|
|
|
$
|
437,129
|
|
|
$
|
358,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys operations outside the United States include
wholly-owned subsidiaries in Bochum, Germany, Oakville, Canada,
Mexico City, Mexico, Markham, Canada and Bangalore, India.
Revenues are attributed to each region based on the location of
the customer. The following is a summary of revenues from
continuing operations and identifiable assets (including
discontinued operations) by geographic areas (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
379,291
|
|
|
$
|
381,166
|
|
|
$
|
310,449
|
|
Rest of World
|
|
|
70,837
|
|
|
|
55,963
|
|
|
|
47,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
450,128
|
|
|
$
|
437,129
|
|
|
$
|
358,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long-Lived Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
863,216
|
|
|
$
|
1,082,743
|
|
|
$
|
1,055,549
|
|
Rest of World
|
|
|
24,565
|
|
|
|
24,946
|
|
|
|
24,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
887,781
|
|
|
$
|
1,107,689
|
|
|
$
|
1,080,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company did not have significant international sales to
individual countries in any year presented.
The results of operations of all consummated acquisitions
described below have been included in the consolidated financial
statements from their respective dates of acquisition.
Digimarc
On August 13, 2008, L-1 completed the acquisition of
Digimarc Corporation (Old Digimarc), which comprises
Digimarcs ID systems business, pursuant to the terms of an
Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated
June 29, 2008, as amended. The aggregate purchase price was
$310.0 million in cash, plus direct acquisition costs of
approximately $5.6 million. L-1s acquisition of
common stock (the Shares) was structured as a
two-step transaction, with a cash tender offer by a wholly-owned
subsidiary of L-1 for the Shares, pursuant to which L-1
initially acquired approximately 79 percent of the issued
and outstanding shares of Old
F-41
Digimarc on August 2, 2008, followed by the merger of such
subsidiary with and into Old Digimarc (the Merger),
with Old Digimarc, now known as L-1 Secure Credentialing, Inc.,
continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly-owned
subsidiary of L-1. Prior to the Merger, Old Digimarc distributed
all of the interests of the limited liability company
(LLC) which held the digital watermarking business,
substantially all the cash of Old Digimarc and certain other
assets and liabilities into a liquidating trust for the benefit
of Old Digimarcs stockholders (the Spin-Off).
Immediately following the Spin-Off, LLC merged with and into New
Digimarc, with New Digimarc continuing as the surviving
corporation, and each unit of LLC converted into one share of
New Digimarc common stock. All restricted stock units and
outstanding options to purchase shares of Old Digimarc common
stock became fully vested and exercisable immediately prior to
the record date used to determine which Old Digimarc
stockholders were entitled to the distribution of LLC interests
in connection with the Spin-Off. Holders of Old Digimarc stock
options who exercised such options received cash consideration
in connection with the Merger and LLC interests in connection
with the Spin-Off. All Old Digimarc stock options that were not
exercised prior to the completion of the Spin-Off were cancelled.
L-1 acquired Old Digimarc because it believes that the
acquisition positions the combined company as a leader in
providing credential systems and to take advantage of the
opportunities created by the enhanced ID programs. Moreover, the
combined company will be able to deliver enhanced protection and
facilitate the development of the next generation of
credentialing functionality. Old Digimarc has been integrated in
the Secure Credentialing operating segment included in the
Solutions reportable segment.
The purchase price, which was funded with borrowings under the
Companys restated and amended credit facility and proceeds
from the issuance of equity securities, has been allocated as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Cash acquired
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
21,187
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
52,437
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
695
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(17,582
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(6,544
|
)
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
1,169
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
38,606
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
225,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
315,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None of the goodwill or the assigned value to intangible assets
is deductible for income tax purposes.
Bioscrypt
On March 5, 2008, the Company acquired Bioscrypt Inc.
(Bioscrypt), a provider of enterprise biometric
access control solutions headquartered in Markham, Canada. Under
the terms of the definitive agreement, the Company issued
approximately 2.6 million common shares. In addition the
Company assumed all Bioscrypt stock options outstanding at the
effective date of the acquisition. The Company has valued the
assumed Bioscrypt stock options consistent with its valuation
methodology of stock options issued by the Company. Bioscrypt is
in the process of being integrated in to the Biometrics
operating segment included in the Solutions reportable segment.
The aggregate purchase price of Bioscrypt was approximately
$37.4 million, including $0.8 million of direct
acquisition costs and stock options valued at $1.4 million.
The Company acquired Bioscrypt for its leadership position in
biometric physical access control, its global customer base, its
offerings that complement
F-42
the Companys existing offerings and expected cost and
revenue synergies. The purchase price has been allocated as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Cash acquired
|
|
$
|
1,710
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
5,013
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
811
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(11,203
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(1,084
|
)
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
2,197
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
40,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
37,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None of the goodwill or the assigned value to the intangible
assets is deductible for income tax purposes.
F-43
|
|
14.
|
ASSET
IMPAIRMENTS AND ACQUISITION RELATED
EXPENSES
|
Asset impairments and acquisition-related charges comprise the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
Asset impairments
|
|
$
|
3,150
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
528,577
|
|
Cash separation costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,106
|
|
Acquisition-related expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,150
|
|
|
$
|
662
|
|
|
$
|
529,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2010, L-1 recorded asset impairments primarily due to the
unsuccessful negotiations related the Companys
participation in the restart of the Registered Traveler program.
In 2009 the Company incurred $0.7 million of costs related
to unsuccessful acquisitions. In 2010 and 2009, the Company
performed its annual impairment tests which indicated there were
no impairment of goodwill. In 2008, the Company recorded asset
impairments of goodwill of $430.0 million and long-lived
assets of $98.6 million, principally intangible assets
recorded in connection with acquisitions, and relate to the
Companys biometrics businesses included in the Solutions
segment. The impairment charges result from the deteriorating
economic conditions that manifested themselves in the fourth
quarter of 2008, particularly as they impacted the biometrics
businesses, as well as capital market conditions that adversely
impacted valuation of businesses the Company acquired and the
Companys stock price and market capitalization.
Pursuant to the standard, Goodwill and Intangible Assets,
the Company is required to test goodwill for impairment
whenever impairment indicators are present, or at least
annually. The Company performs its annual impairment test as of
October 31 each year. The estimated fair value of the reporting
units was determined primarily using the discounted cash flow
method, and considering comparable market transactions and
multiples. The aggregate enterprise values of all reporting
units resulting from the valuations were then compared to the
Companys market capitalization at the valuation date.
Pursuant to the standard, the Company compared the carrying
amounts of its reporting units to their estimated fair values.
At October 31, 2010 and 2009, (and at September 30,
2010 for reporting units comprised of discontinued operations,
the estimated fair values of reporting units significantly
exceeded the recorded amounts. Accordingly, we concluded that no
impairment was indicated. At December 31, 2008 the carrying
amounts (after adjusting for the impairment of long-lived assets
described below) of certain reporting units within the Solutions
segment exceeded the respective estimated fair values and thus
were indicated to be impaired. The Company calculated the
impairment loss by deriving the implied fair value of the
goodwill after allocating the estimated fair value of the
impaired reporting units to tangible and intangible assets. With
respect to the other reporting units for which an impairment was
not indicated, the estimated fair values significantly exceeded
the recorded amounts.
For reporting units with an estimated fair value that was less
than the carrying amount, the Company considered whether
long-lived assets were also impaired. As required by the
standard, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets, the Company compared the carrying amounts
of the identified asset groups (including goodwill) to the
undiscounted cash flow of the asset groups. The impairment loss
was calculated as the difference between the carrying amount of
the long-lived assets and their estimated fair values,
determined primarily based on the discounted cash flows method.
Prior to 2010, estimates of fair values were primarily based on
the discounted cash flows based on the Companys latest
plans and projections. The use of the discounted cash flow
method requires significant judgments and assumptions of future
events many of which are outside the control of the Company,
including estimates of future growth rates, income tax rates,
and discount rates, among others. In addition, the use of market
transactions and multiples requires significant judgment as to
whether observed data is comparable to the reporting units being
evaluated and how much weight should attributed to such data in
the valuation. The estimated fair value of the reporting units
in 2010 was based upon the enterprise value indicated by the
sales
F-44
prices of the Intel Business and the continuing operations
business as being more indicative of the enterprise value of the
reporting units.
|
|
15.
|
DISCONTINUED
OPERATIONS
|
In February 2011, BAE acquired the stock and membership
interests of the entities comprising the L-1 Intel Business for
a purchase price of approximately $295.8 million in cash
(inclusive of acquired cash) and approximately $7.2 million
in assumed obligations. These businesses include SpecTal, LLC,
Advanced Concepts, Inc., and McClendon, LLC. Pursuant to the
Credit Agreement, the net cash proceeds from the closing of the
BAE transaction were used to make mandatory and voluntary
prepayments of the Companys indebtedness outstanding under
its credit facility.
The major classes of assets and liabilities that are included as
part of the Intel Business (and presented as held for sale at
December 31, 2010) are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
370
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
42,008
|
|
|
|
40,319
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
2,404
|
|
|
|
2,291
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets, net
|
|
|
226,353
|
|
|
|
229,383
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
271,290
|
|
|
$
|
272,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
24,322
|
|
|
$
|
23,250
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
17,337
|
|
|
|
14,016
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
42,124
|
|
|
$
|
37,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held for sale are carried at the lower of their carrying
amounts or sales price less costs to sell. The Company expects
to recognize a pre-tax gain on the sale of the Intel Business of
approximately $40.0 million.
A summary of the results of operations of the discontinued
operations comprise the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
218,402
|
|
|
$
|
213,808
|
|
|
$
|
204,733
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
(154,432
|
)
|
|
|
(149,736
|
)
|
|
|
(143,770
|
)
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
(49,049
|
)
|
|
|
(41,488
|
)
|
|
|
(40,334
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
14,921
|
|
|
|
22,584
|
|
|
|
20,629
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(23,715
|
)
|
|
|
(26,655
|
)
|
|
|
(14,613
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
721
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(8,073
|
)
|
|
|
(4,021
|
)
|
|
|
6,032
|
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
|
|
|
1,622
|
|
|
|
1,133
|
|
|
|
(2,317
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
(6,451
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,888
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective September 19, 2010, the Company ceased recording
depreciation and amortization of long-lived assets related to
discontinued operations. Included in discontinued operations is
interest expense related to the
F-45
estimated debt that is required to be repaid from the net cash
proceeds from the sale of the business in accordance with the
terms of the Credit Agreement. Interest has been allocated to
discontinued operations based on the ratio that the estimated
debt required to be repaid bears to the total average debt
outstanding during the period.
The tax benefit (provision) allocated to discontinued operations
was determined by first calculating the provision on a
consolidated basis including discontinued operations and then
calculating the provision excluding the discontinued operations.
The difference between the two calculations was then allocated
to discontinued operations.
In connection with the sale of the Intel Business, the Company
expects to recognize a gain for tax reporting purposes, which is
estimated to result in a current tax payment of between
$10.0 million and $20.0 million. The tax effects of
the sale will be reflected as discrete items in the period
during which the sale is consummated.
F-46