e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31,
2011
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
Commission file number 1-12387
TENNECO INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
76-0515284
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
500 North Field Drive, Lake Forest, Illinois
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
60045
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(847) 482-5000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
Accelerated filer o
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
Smaller reporting company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the
issuers classes of common stock as of the latest
practicable date.
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share: 60,457,773 shares
outstanding as of April 29, 2011.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
* |
|
No response to this item is included herein for the reason that
it is inapplicable or the answer to such item is negative. |
1
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE SAFE HARBOR
PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF
1995
This Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements within
the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995 concerning, among other things, our prospects and business
strategies. These forward-looking statements are included in
various sections of this report, including the section entitled
Outlook appearing in Item 2 of this report. The
words may, will, believe,
should, could, plan,
expect, anticipate,
estimate, and similar expressions (and variations
thereof), identify these forward-looking statements. Although we
believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking
statements are based on reasonable assumptions, these
expectations may not prove to be correct. Because these
forward-looking statements are also subject to risks and
uncertainties, actual results may differ materially from the
expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements.
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from the expectations reflected in the
forward-looking statements include:
|
|
|
|
|
general economic, business and market conditions;
|
|
|
|
our ability to source and procure needed materials, components
and other products and services in accordance with customer
demand and at competitive prices, including any impact on our
ability to source and procure such items and services due to
supply disruptions that may be caused by the recent earthquake
and tsunami in Japan;
|
|
|
|
changes in capital availability or costs, including increases in
our cost of borrowing (i.e., interest rate increases), the
amount of our debt, our ability to access capital markets at
favorable rates, and the credit ratings of our debt;
|
|
|
|
changes in consumer demand, prices and our ability to have our
products included on top selling vehicles, including any shifts
in consumer preferences away from light trucks, which tend to be
higher margin products for our customers and us, to other lower
margin vehicles, for which we may or may not have supply
contracts;
|
|
|
|
changes in automotive and commercial vehicle manufacturers
production rates and their actual and forecasted requirements
for our products, such as the significant production cuts during
2008 and 2009 by automotive manufacturers in response to
difficult economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
the overall highly competitive nature of the automobile and
commercial vehicle parts industry, and any resultant inability
to realize the sales represented by our awarded book of business
(which is based on anticipated pricing and volumes for the
applicable program over its life);
|
|
|
|
the loss of any of our large original equipment manufacturer
(OEM) customers (on whom we depend for a substantial
portion of our revenues), or the loss of market shares by these
customers if we are unable to achieve increased sales to other
OEMs;
|
|
|
|
industrywide strikes, labor disruptions at our facilities or any
labor or other economic disruptions at any of our significant
customers or suppliers or any of our customers other
suppliers (such as the 2008 strike at American Axle, which
disrupted our supply of products for significant General Motors
platforms);
|
|
|
|
increases in the costs of raw materials, including our ability
to successfully reduce the impact of any such cost increases
through materials substitutions, cost reduction initiatives, low
cost country sourcing, and price recovery efforts with
aftermarket and OE customers;
|
|
|
|
the negative impact of higher fuel prices on transportation and
logistics costs, raw material costs and discretionary purchases
of vehicles or aftermarket products;
|
|
|
|
the cyclical nature of the global vehicle industry, including
the performance of the global aftermarket sector and the longer
product lives of vehicle parts;
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully execute cash management,
restructuring and other cost reduction plans and to realize
anticipated benefits from these plans;
|
|
|
|
costs related to product warranties and other customer
satisfaction actions;
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
the impact of consolidation among vehicle parts suppliers and
customers on our ability to compete;
|
|
|
|
changes in distribution channels or competitive conditions in
the markets and countries where we operate, including the impact
of changes in distribution channels for aftermarket products on
our ability to increase or maintain aftermarket sales;
|
|
|
|
the cost and outcome of existing and any future legal
proceedings, including, but not limited to, proceedings against
us or our customers relating to intellectual property rights;
|
|
|
|
economic, exchange rate and political conditions in the
countries where we operate or sell our products;
|
|
|
|
customer acceptance of new products;
|
|
|
|
new technologies that reduce the demand for certain of our
products or otherwise render them obsolete;
|
|
|
|
our ability to realize our business strategy of improving
operating performance;
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully integrate any acquisitions that we
complete and effectively manage our joint ventures and other
third-party partnerships;
|
|
|
|
changes by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or the
Securities and Exchange Commission of authoritative generally
accepted accounting principles or policies;
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting estimates and assumptions, including
changes based on additional information;
|
|
|
|
any changes by International Standards Organization (ISO),
Technical Specifications (TS) and other such committees in their
certification processes for processes and products, which may
have the effect of delaying or hindering our ability to bring
new products to market;
|
|
|
|
the impact of changes in and compliance with laws and
regulations, including environmental laws and regulations, which
may result in our incurrence of environmental liabilities in
excess of the amount reserved, the implementation of mandated
timelines for worldwide emission regulation, which could impact
the demand for certain of our products, and any changes to the
timing of the funding requirements for our pension and other
postretirement benefit liabilities;
|
|
|
|
decisions by federal, state and local governments to provide (or
discontinue) incentive programs related to automobile or other
vehicle purchases;
|
|
|
|
the potential impairment in the carrying value of our long-lived
assets and goodwill or our deferred tax assets;
|
|
|
|
potential volatility in our effective tax rate;
|
|
|
|
acts of war
and/or
terrorism, as well as actions taken or to be taken by the United
States and other governments as a result of further acts or
threats of terrorism, and the impact of these acts on economic,
financial and social conditions in the countries where we
operate; and
|
|
|
|
the timing and occurrence (or non-occurrence) of other
transactions, events and circumstances which may be beyond our
control.
|
The risks included here are not exhaustive. Refer to
Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors
in our annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010, for further
discussion regarding our exposure to risks. Additionally, new
risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for
us to predict all such risk factors, nor to assess the impact
such risk factors might have on our business or the extent to
which any factor or combination of factors may cause actual
results to differ materially from those contained in any
forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties,
investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking
statements as a prediction of actual results.
3
PART I.
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
|
ITEM 1.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Tenneco Inc.:
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance
sheet of Tenneco Inc. and consolidated subsidiaries as of
March 31, 2011, and the related condensed consolidated
statements of income, cash flows, changes in shareholders
equity, and comprehensive income (loss) for the three-month
periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. These interim
financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A
review of interim financial information consists principally of
applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons
responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is
substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the
expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements
taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material
modifications that should be made to the accompanying condensed
consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
We previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010, and the
related consolidated statements of income (loss), cash flows,
changes in shareholders equity and comprehensive income
(loss) for the year then ended (not presented herein), and in
our report dated February 25, 2011, we expressed an
unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying
condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2010, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to
the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chicago, Illinois
May 6, 2011
4
TENNECO
INC.
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Millions Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales and operating revenues
|
|
$
|
1,760
|
|
|
$
|
1,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown
below)
|
|
|
1,466
|
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
Engineering, research, and development
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of other intangibles
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,661
|
|
|
|
1,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of receivables
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before interest expense, income taxes, and
noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Interest expense (net of interest capitalized of $1 million
in each of the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Tenneco Inc.
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
59,849,278
|
|
|
|
58,948,351
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
62,074,523
|
|
|
|
60,811,047
|
|
Basic earnings per share of common stock
|
|
$
|
0.78
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
Diluted earnings per share of common stock
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
The accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
statements of income.
5
TENNECO
INC.
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
199
|
|
|
$
|
233
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer notes and accounts, net
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
796
|
|
Other
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
Materials and supplies
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Prepayments and other
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
2,129
|
|
|
|
1,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term receivables, net
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
Intangibles, net
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Other
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant, property, and equipment, at cost
|
|
|
3,208
|
|
|
|
3,109
|
|
Less Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(2,136
|
)
|
|
|
(2,059
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,072
|
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,532
|
|
|
$
|
3,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt (including current maturities of long-term debt)
|
|
$
|
146
|
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
|
1,048
|
|
Accrued taxes
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
Other
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,729
|
|
|
|
1,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,185
|
|
|
|
1,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement benefits
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred credits and other liabilities
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
3,399
|
|
|
|
3,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenneco Inc. Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Premium on common stock and other capital surplus
|
|
|
3,009
|
|
|
|
3,008
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
(237
|
)
|
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
|
|
|
(2,489
|
)
|
|
|
(2,536
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
Less Shares held as treasury stock, at cost
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Tenneco Inc. shareholders equity
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interests and equity
|
|
$
|
3,532
|
|
|
$
|
3,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
balance sheets.
6
TENNECO
INC.
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash used by operating
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of other intangibles
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Changes in components of working capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in receivables
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in inventories
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in prepayments and other current assets
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in payables
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued taxes
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Increase (decrease) in other current liabilities
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Change in long-term assets
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Change in long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by operating activities
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Cash payments for plant, property, and equipment
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
Cash payments for software related intangible assets
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement of long-term debt
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in bank overdrafts
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Net increase in revolver borrowings and short-term debt
excluding current maturities of long-term debt and short-term
borrowings secured by accounts receivable
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Net increase in short-term borrowings secured by accounts
receivable
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interest partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents January 1
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, March 31 (Note)
|
|
$
|
199
|
|
|
$
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for interest
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
Cash paid during the period for income taxes (net of refunds)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period ended balance of payable for plant, property, and
equipment
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
|
Note: |
Cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid investments with
a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase.
|
The accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements are an integral part of these
condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.
7
TENNECO
INC.
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
(Millions Except Share Amounts)
|
|
|
Tenneco Inc. Shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1
|
|
|
61,541,760
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
60,789,739
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Issued pursuant to benefit plans
|
|
|
59,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
125,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31
|
|
|
61,727,288
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
60,999,531
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium on Common Stock and Other Capital Surplus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,005
|
|
Purchase of additional noncontrolling equity interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Premium on common stock issued pursuant to benefit plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(237
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(243
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,536
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,575
|
)
|
Net income attributable to Tenneco Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,489
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,568
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Common Stock Held as Treasury Stock, at
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1 and March 31
|
|
|
1,294,692
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
1,294,692
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Tenneco Inc. shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling Interests:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Sale of twenty percent equity interest to Tenneco Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
statements of changes in shareholders equity.
8
TENNECO
INC.
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
Tenneco Inc.
|
|
|
Noncontrolling Interests
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation of foreign currency statements
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Liability for Pension Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Liability for Pension and Postretirement Benefits,
net of tax
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31
|
|
$
|
(211
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Tenneco Inc.
|
|
|
Noncontrolling Interests
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation of foreign currency statements
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Liability for Pension Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Liability for Pension and Postretirement Benefits,
net of tax
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31
|
|
|
(248
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(248
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31
|
|
$
|
(243
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(243
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements are in an integral part
of these statements of comprehensive income (loss).
9
TENNECO
INC.
(Unaudited)
|
|
(1)
|
Consolidation
and Presentation
|
As you read the accompanying financial statements you should
also read our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010.
In our opinion, the accompanying unaudited financial statements
contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
adjustments) necessary to present fairly Tenneco Inc.s
financial position, results of operations, cash flows, changes
in shareholders equity, and comprehensive income (loss)
for the periods indicated. We have prepared the unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements pursuant to the
rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission for interim financial information. Accordingly, they
do not include all of the information and footnotes required by
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (U.S. GAAP) for annual financial statements.
Our condensed consolidated financial statements include all
majority-owned subsidiaries. We carry investments in
20 percent to 50 percent owned companies in which the
Company does not have a controlling interest, as equity method
investments, at cost plus equity in undistributed earnings since
the date of acquisition and cumulative translation adjustments.
We have eliminated all intercompany transactions. We have
evaluated all subsequent events through the date the financial
statements were issued.
|
|
(2)
|
Financial
Instruments
|
The carrying and estimated fair values of our financial
instruments by class at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Carrying Amount
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Carrying Amount
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
Long-term debt (including current maturities)
|
|
$
|
1,188
|
|
|
$
|
1,236
|
|
|
$
|
1,162
|
|
|
$
|
1,201
|
|
Instruments with off-balance sheet risk:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Asset and Liability Instruments The fair
value of cash and cash equivalents, short and long-term
receivables, accounts payable, and short-term debt was
considered to be the same as or was not determined to be
materially different from the carrying amount.
Long-term Debt The fair value of our public
fixed rate senior notes is based on quoted market prices. The
fair value of our private borrowings under our senior credit
facility and other long-term debt instruments is based on the
market value of debt with similar maturities, interest rates and
risk characteristics.
Foreign exchange forward contracts We use
derivative financial instruments, principally foreign currency
forward purchase and sales contracts with terms of less than one
year, to hedge our exposure to changes in foreign currency
exchange rates. Our primary exposure to changes in foreign
currency rates results from intercompany loans made between
affiliates to minimize the need for borrowings from third
parties. Additionally, we enter into foreign currency forward
purchase and sale contracts to mitigate our exposure to changes
in exchange rates on certain intercompany and third-party trade
receivables and payables. We manage counter-party credit risk by
entering into derivative financial instruments with major
financial institutions that can be expected to fully perform
under the terms of such agreements. We do not enter into
derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. The
fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts is based on
an internally developed model which incorporates observable
inputs including quoted spot rates, forward exchange rates and
discounted future expected cash flows utilizing market interest
rates with similar quality and maturity characteristics. We
record the change in fair value of these foreign exchange
forward contracts as part of currency gains (losses) within cost
of sales in the condensed consolidated statements of income. The
fair value of foreign exchange forward contracts are recorded in
10
TENNECO
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
prepayments and other current assets or other current
liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The
fair value of our foreign exchange forward contracts, presented
on a gross basis by derivative contract at March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010, respectively, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
Total
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
The fair value of our recurring financial assets and liabilities
at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively,
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
Financial Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
The fair value hierarchy definition prioritizes the inputs used
in measuring fair value into the following levels:
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 Inputs, other than quoted prices in
active markets, that are observable either directly or
indirectly.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs based on our own
assumptions.
The following table summarizes by major currency the notional
amounts for foreign currency forward purchase and sale contracts
as of March 31, 2011 (all of which mature in 2011):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Amount
|
|
|
|
|
in Foreign Currency
|
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
Australian dollars
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
Sell
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
British pounds
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
Sell
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
European euro
|
|
Sell
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Czech Republic koruna
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
122
|
|
Japanese Yen
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
585
|
|
South African rand
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
208
|
|
U.S. dollars
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
Sell
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
Other
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
Sell
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3)
|
Long-Term
Debt and Financing Arrangements
|
Our financing arrangements are primarily provided by a committed
senior secured financing arrangement with a syndicate of banks
and other financial institutions. The arrangement is secured by
substantially all our domestic assets and pledges of up to
66 percent of the stock of certain first-tier foreign
subsidiaries, as well as guarantees by our material domestic
subsidiaries.
11
TENNECO
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
On June 3, 2010, we completed an amendment and extension of
our senior secured credit facility by extending the term of our
revolving credit facility and replacing our $128 million
term loan A with a larger and longer maturity term loan B
facility. As a result of the amendment and extension, as of
March 31, 2011, the senior credit facility provides us with
a total revolving credit facility size of $622 million
until March 16, 2012, when commitments of $66 million
will expire. After March 16, 2012, the extended revolving
credit facility will provide $556 million of revolving
credit and will mature on May 31, 2014. The extended
facility will mature earlier on December 15, 2013, if our
$130 million
tranche B-1
letter of credit/revolving loan facility is not refinanced by
that date. Prior to maturity, funds may be borrowed, repaid and
re-borrowed under the two revolving credit facilities without
premium or penalty. The leverage ratio (consolidated
indebtedness net of cash divided by consolidated EBITDA as
defined in the senior credit facility agreement) was decreased
from 5.00 to 4.50 for the second quarter of 2010; from 4.75 to
4.25 for the third quarter of 2010; and from 4.50 to 4.25 for
the fourth quarter of 2010 as a result of the June 3, 2010
amendment.
As of March 31, 2011, the senior credit facility also
provides a six-year, $150 million term loan B maturing in
June 2016, and a seven-year $130 million
tranche B-1
letter of credit/revolving loan facility maturing in March 2014.
We are required to make quarterly principal payments of $375
thousand on the term loan B, beginning on September 20,
2010 through March 31, 2016 with a final payment of
$141 million due June 3, 2016. The
tranche B-1
letter of credit/revolving loan facility requires repayment by
March 2014. We can enter into revolving loans and issue letters
of credit under the $130 million
tranche B-1
letter of credit/revolving loan facility. The
tranche B-1
letter of credit/revolving loan facility is reflected as debt on
our balance sheet only if we borrow money under this facility or
if we use the facility to make payments for letters of credit.
There is no additional cost to us for issuing letters of credit
under the
tranche B-1
letter of credit/revolving loan facility. However, outstanding
letters of credit reduce our availability to enter into
revolving loans under the facility. We pay the
tranche B-1
lenders interest equal to LIBOR plus a margin on all borrowings
under the facility. Funds deposited with the administrative
agent by the lenders and not borrowed by the Company earn
interest at an annual rate approximately equal to LIBOR less
25 basis points.
The financial ratios required under the senior credit facility
for the remainder of 2011 and beyond are set forth below. As of
March 31, 2011, we were in compliance with all the
financial covenants and operational restrictions of the senior
credit facility.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Leverage
|
|
Coverage
|
Period Ending
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Ratio
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
3.75
|
|
|
|
2.55
|
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
2.55
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
2.55
|
|
Each quarter thereafter
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
2.75
|
|
Beginning June 3, 2010, our term loan B and revolving
credit facility bear interest at an annual rate equal to, at our
option, either (i) the London Interbank Offered Rate plus a
margin of 475 and 450 basis points, respectively, or
(ii) a rate consisting of the greater of (a) the
JPMorgan Chase prime rate plus a margin of 375 and
350 basis points, respectively, (b) the Federal Funds
rate plus 50 basis points plus a margin of 375 and
350 basis points, respectively, and (c) the Eurodollar
Rate plus 100 basis points plus a margin of 375 and
350 basis points, respectively. The margin we pay on these
borrowings will be reduced by 25 basis points following
each fiscal quarter for which our consolidated net leverage
ratio is less than 2.25 for extending lenders and for the term
loan B and will be further reduced by an additional
25 basis points following each fiscal quarter for which the
consolidated net leverage ratio is less than 2.0 for extending
lenders. The margin we pay on these borrowings for extending
lenders will increase by 50 basis points following each
fiscal quarter for which our consolidated net leverage ratio is
greater than or equal to 4.00 and will be further increased by
an additional 50 basis points following each fiscal quarter
for which the
12
TENNECO
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
consolidated net leverage ratio is greater than or equal to
5.00. Our consolidated net leverage ratio was 2.32 and 2.24 as
of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
As a result, the margin we pay on these borrowings was reduced
in February 2011 by 25 basis points for extending lenders.
However, since the ratio increased during the quarter, the
margin we pay on borrowings will increase by 25 basis
points beginning in May 2011 and will remain at such level for
so long as our consolidated net leverage ratio remains above
2.25 and less than 4.00.
The borrowings under our
tranche B-1
letter of credit/revolving loan facility incur interest at an
annual rate equal to, at our option, either (i) the London
Interbank Offered Rate plus a margin of 500 basis points,
or (ii) a rate consisting of the greater of (a) the
JPMorgan Chase prime rate plus a margin of 400 basis
points, (b) the Federal Funds rate plus 50 basis
points plus a margin of 400 basis points, and (c) the
Eurodollar Rate plus 100 basis points plus a margin of
400 basis points. The rate will increase by 50 basis
points following each fiscal quarter for which our consolidated
net leverage ratio is greater than or equal to 5.0.
At March 31, 2011, of the $752 million available under
the two revolving credit facilities within our senior secured
credit facility, we had unused borrowing capacity of
$652 million with $47 million in outstanding
borrowings and $53 million in letters of credit
outstanding. As of March 31, 2011, our outstanding debt
also included $250 million of
81/8 percent
senior notes due November 15, 2015, $149 million term
loan B due June 3, 2016, $225 million of
73/4 percent
senior notes due August 15, 2018, $500 million of
67/8 percent
senior notes due December 15, 2020, and $160 million
of other debt.
On December 9, 2010, we commenced a cash tender offer of
our outstanding $500 million
85/8
percent senior subordinated notes due in 2014 and a consent
solicitation to amend the indenture governing these notes. The
consent solicitation expired on December 22, 2010 and the
cash tender offer expired on January 6, 2011. On
December 23, 2010, we issued $500 million of
67/8 percent
senior notes due December 15, 2020 in a private offering.
The net proceeds of this transaction, together with cash and
available liquidity, were used to finance the purchase of our
85/8 percent
senior subordinated notes pursuant to the tender offer at a
price of 103.25 percent of the principal amount, plus accrued
and unpaid interest for holders who tendered prior to the
expiration of the consent solicitation, and 100.25 percent
of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, for
other participants. On January 7, 2011, we redeemed all
remaining outstanding $20 million of senior subordinated
notes that were not previously tendered, at a price of
102.875 percent of the principal amount, plus accrued and
unpaid interest. To facilitate these transactions, we amended
our senior credit agreement to permit us to refinance our senior
subordinated notes with new senior unsecured notes. We did not
incur any fee in connection with this amendment. The new notes
are general senior obligations of Tenneco Inc. and are not
secured by assets of Tenneco Inc. or any of our subsidiaries
that guarantee the new notes. We recorded $20 million of
pre-tax charges in December 2010 and an additional
$1 million of pre-tax charges in the first quarter of 2011
related to our repurchase and redemption of our
85/8 percent
senior subordinated notes. On March 14, 2011, we completed
an offer to exchange the $500 million of
67/8 percent
senior notes due in 2020 which have been registered under the
Securities Act of 1933, for and in replacement of all
outstanding unregistered
67/8 percent
senior notes due in 2020. We received tenders from holders of
all $500 million of the aggregate outstanding amount of the
original notes. The terms of the new notes are substantially
identical to the terms of the original notes for which they were
exchanged, except that the transfer restrictions and the
registration rights applicable to the original notes generally
do not apply to the new notes.
On August 3, 2010, we issued $225 million of
73/4 percent
senior notes due August 15, 2018 in a private offering. The
net proceeds of this transaction, together with cash and
available liquidity, were used to finance the redemption of our
101/4 percent
senior secured notes due in 2013. We called the senior secured
notes for redemption on August 3, 2010, and completed the
redemption on September 2, 2010 at a price of
101.708 percent of the principal amount, plus accrued and
unpaid interest. We recorded $5 million of expense related
to our redemption of our
101/4
percent senior secured notes in the third quarter of 2010. The
new notes are general senior obligations of Tenneco Inc. and are
not secured by assets of Tenneco Inc. or any of our subsidiaries
that guarantee the new notes. On February 14, 2011, we
completed an offer to exchange the $225 million of
73/4 percent
senior notes due in 2018
13
TENNECO
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
which have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, for
and in replacement of all outstanding unregistered
73/4 percent
senior notes due in 2018. We received tenders from holders of
all $225 million of the aggregate outstanding amount of the
original notes. The terms of the new notes are substantially
identical to the terms of the original notes for which they were
exchanged, except that the transfer restrictions and the
registration rights applicable to the original notes generally
do not apply to the new notes.
We evaluate our deferred income taxes quarterly to determine if
valuation allowances are required or should be adjusted.
U.S. GAAP requires that companies assess whether valuation
allowances should be established against their deferred tax
assets based on consideration of all available evidence, both
positive and negative, using a more likely than not
standard. This assessment considers, among other matters, the
nature, frequency and amount of recent losses, the duration of
statutory carryforward periods, and tax planning strategies. In
making such judgments, significant weight is given to evidence
that can be objectively verified.
Valuation allowances have been established for deferred tax
assets based on a more likely than not threshold.
The ability to realize deferred tax assets depends on our
ability to generate sufficient taxable income within the
carryforward periods provided for in the tax law for each tax
jurisdiction. We have considered the following possible sources
of taxable income when assessing the realization of our deferred
tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences;
|
|
|
|
Taxable income or loss, based on recent results, exclusive of
reversing temporary differences and carryforwards; and
|
|
|
|
Tax-planning strategies.
|
We reported income tax expense of $14 million in the first
quarter of 2011. The tax expense recorded differs from the
expense that would be recorded using a U.S. Federal
statutory rate of 35 percent due to a net tax benefit of
$10 million primarily related to U.S. taxable income
with no associated tax expense due to our net operating loss
(NOL) position, and income generated in lower tax
rate jurisdictions, partially offset by the impact of recording
a valuation allowance against the tax benefit for losses in
certain foreign jurisdictions. In evaluating the requirements to
record a valuation allowance, accounting standards do not permit
us to consider an economic recovery in the U.S. or new
business we have won. Consequently, beginning in 2008, given our
historical losses, we concluded that our ability to fully
utilize our NOLs was limited due to projecting the continuation
of the negative economic environment and the impact of the
negative operating environment on our tax planning strategies.
As a result of our tax planning strategies which have not yet
been implemented and which do not depend upon generating future
taxable income, we carry deferred tax assets in the U.S. of
$90 million relating to the expected utilization of those
NOLs. The federal NOLs expire beginning in tax years ending in
2020 through 2029. The state NOLs expire in various tax years
through 2029.
If our operating performance improves on a sustained basis, our
conclusion regarding the need for a valuation allowance could
change, resulting in the reversal of some or all of the
valuation allowance in the future. The charge to establish the
U.S. valuation allowance also includes items related to the
losses allocable to certain state jurisdictions where it was
determined that tax attributes related to those jurisdictions
were potentially not realizable.
We are required to record a valuation allowance against deferred
tax assets generated by taxable losses in each period in the
U.S. as well as in other foreign jurisdictions. Our future
provision for income taxes will include no tax benefit with
respect to losses incurred and no tax expense with respect to
income generated in these jurisdictions until the respective
valuation allowance is eliminated. This will cause variability
in our effective tax rate.
14
TENNECO
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
|
|
(5)
|
Accounts
Receivable Securitization
|
We securitize some of our accounts receivable on a limited
recourse basis in North America and Europe. As servicer under
these accounts receivable securitization programs, we are
responsible for performing all accounts receivable
administration functions for these securitized financial assets
including collections and processing of customer invoice
adjustments. In North America, we have an accounts receivable
securitization program with three commercial banks. We
securitize original equipment and aftermarket receivables on a
daily basis under the bank program. In March 2011, the North
American program was amended and extended to March 23,
2012. The first priority facility continues to provide financing
of up to $110 million and the second priority facility,
which is subordinated to the first priority facility, continues
to provide up to an additional $40 million of financing.
Both facilities monetize accounts receivable generated in the
U.S. and Canada that meet certain eligibility requirements,
and the second priority facility also monetizes certain accounts
receivable generated in the U.S. or Canada that would
otherwise be ineligible under the first priority securitization
facility. The amendments to the North American program expand
the trade receivables that are eligible for purchase under the
program and decrease the margin we pay to our banks. The amount
of outstanding third party investments in our securitized
accounts receivable under the North American program was
$82 million at March 31, 2011 and zero at
December 31, 2010.
Each facility contains customary covenants for financings of
this type, including restrictions related to liens, payments,
mergers or consolidation and amendments to the agreements
underlying the receivables pool. Further, each facility may be
terminated upon the occurrence of customary events (with
customary grace periods, if applicable), including breaches of
covenants, failure to maintain certain financial ratios,
inaccuracies of representations and warranties, bankruptcy and
insolvency events, certain changes in the rate of default or
delinquency of the receivables, a change of control and the
entry or other enforcement of material judgments. In addition,
each facility contains cross-default provisions, where the
facility could be terminated in the event of non-payment of
other material indebtedness when due and any other event which
permits the acceleration of the maturity of material
indebtedness.
We also securitize receivables in our European operations with
regional banks in Europe. The arrangements to securitize
receivables in Europe are provided under seven separate
facilities provided by various financial institutions in each of
the foreign jurisdictions. The commitments for these
arrangements are generally for one year, but some may be
cancelled with notice 90 days prior to renewal. In some
instances, the arrangement provides for cancellation by the
applicable financial institution at any time upon 15 days,
or less, notification. The amount of outstanding third party
investments in our securitized accounts receivable in Europe was
$147 million and $91 million at March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010, respectively.
If we were not able to securitize receivables under either the
North American or European securitization programs, our
borrowings under our revolving credit agreements might increase.
These accounts receivable securitization programs provide us
with access to cash at costs that are generally favorable to
alternative sources of financing, and allow us to reduce
borrowings under our revolving credit agreements.
In our North American accounts receivable securitization
programs, we transfer a partial interest in a pool of
receivables and the interest that we retain is subordinate to
the transferred interest. Accordingly, we account for our North
American securitization program as a secured borrowing. In our
European programs, we transfer accounts receivables in their
entirety to the acquiring entities and satisfy all of the
conditions established under ASC Topic 860,
Transfers and Servicing, to report the transfer of
financial assets in their entirety as a sale. The fair value of
assets received as proceeds in exchange for the transfer of
accounts receivable under our European securitization programs
approximates the fair value of such receivables. We recognized
$1 million in interest expense in both the three month
period ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively,
relating to our North American securitization program. In
addition, we recognized a loss of $1 million in both the
three month period ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively, on the sale of trade accounts receivable in our
European accounts receivable securitization programs,
representing the discount from book values at which these
receivables were sold
15
TENNECO
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
to our banks. The discount rate varies based on funding costs
incurred by our banks, which averaged approximately three
percent and four percent during the first quarter of 2011 and
2010, respectively.
|
|
(6)
|
Restructuring
and Other Charges
|
Over the past several years, we have adopted plans to
restructure portions of our operations. These plans were
approved by our Board of Directors and were designed to reduce
operational and administrative overhead costs throughout the
business. In 2010, we incurred $19 million in restructuring
and related costs, of which $14 million was recorded in
cost of sales and $5 million was recorded in depreciation
and amortization expense. In the first quarter of 2011, we
incurred $1 million in restructuring and related costs, all
of which was recorded in cost of sales.
Amounts related to activities that are part of our restructuring
plans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
Impact of
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
Cash
|
|
Exchange
|
|
Reserve
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
Reserve
|
|
Payments
|
|
Rates
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
Reserve
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
Severance
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
Under the terms of our amended and extended senior credit
agreement that took effect on June 3, 2010, we are allowed
to exclude $60 million of cash charges and expenses, before
taxes, related to cost reduction initiatives incurred after
June 3, 2010 from the calculation of the financial covenant
ratios required under our senior credit facility. As of
March 31, 2011, we have excluded $10 million in
cumulative allowable charges relating to restructuring
initiatives against the $60 million available under the
terms of the senior credit facility.
On September 22, 2009, we announced that we will be closing
our original equipment ride control plant in Cozad, Nebraska. We
plan to hire at other facilities as we move production from
Cozad to those facilities, resulting in a net decrease of
approximately 60 positions. We originally planned to have
completed the closing of this facility by the end of 2010,
however, as a result of increased customer demand and to better
optimize the transfer of some of the manufacturing activities,
we plan to supply certain of our other facilities with
components from Cozad to support this increased demand until
capacity adjustments are completed at our other facilities.
During 2009 and 2010, we recorded $11 million and
$10 million, respectively, of restructuring and related
expenses related to this initiative, of which approximately
$16 million represents cash expenditures.
|
|
(7)
|
Environmental
Matters, Litigation and Product Warranties
|
We are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution
control laws and regulations in all jurisdictions in which we
operate. We expense or capitalize, as appropriate, expenditures
for ongoing compliance with environmental regulations that
relate to current operations. We expense costs related to an
existing condition caused by past operations that do not
contribute to current or future revenue generation. We record
liabilities when environmental assessments indicate that
required remedial efforts are probable and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Estimates of the liability are based upon
currently available facts, existing technology, and presently
enacted laws and regulations taking into consideration the
likely effects of inflation and other societal and economic
factors. We consider all available evidence including prior
experience in remediation of contaminated sites, other
companies cleanup experiences and data released by the
United States Environmental Protection Agency or other
organizations. These estimated liabilities are subject to
revision in future periods based on actual costs or new
information. Where future cash flows are fixed or reliably
determinable, we have discounted the liabilities. All other
environmental liabilities are recorded at their undiscounted
amounts. We evaluate recoveries separately from the liability
16
TENNECO
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
and, when they are assured, recoveries are recorded and reported
separately from the associated liability in our condensed
consolidated financial statements.
As of March 31, 2011, we have the obligation to remediate
or contribute towards the remediation of certain sites,
including two existing Federal Superfund sites. At
March 31, 2011, our aggregated estimated share of
environmental remediation costs for all these sites on a
discounted basis was approximately $16 million, of which
$5 million is recorded in other current liabilities and
$11 million is recorded in deferred credits and other
liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheet. For
those locations in which the liability was discounted, the
weighted average discount rate used was 2.6 percent. The
undiscounted value of the estimated remediation costs was
$21 million. Based on information known to us, we have
established reserves that we believe are adequate for these
costs. Although we believe these estimates of remediation costs
are reasonable and are based on the latest available
information, the costs are estimates and are subject to revision
as more information becomes available about the extent of
remediation required. At some sites, we expect that other
parties will contribute towards the remediation costs. In
addition, certain environmental statutes provide that our
liability could be joint and several, meaning that we could be
required to pay in excess of our share of remediation costs. Our
understanding of the financial strength of other potentially
responsible parties at these sites has been considered, where
appropriate, in our determination of our estimated liability.
We do not believe that any potential costs associated with our
current status as a potentially responsible party in the Federal
Superfund sites, or as a liable party at the other locations
referenced herein, will be material to our condensed
consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash
flows.
We also from time to time are involved in legal proceedings,
claims or investigations that are incidental to the conduct of
our business. Some of these proceedings allege damages against
us relating to environmental liabilities (including toxic tort,
property damage and remediation), intellectual property matters
(including patent, trademark and copyright infringement, and
licensing disputes), personal injury claims (including injuries
due to product failure, design or warning issues, and other
product liability related matters), taxes, employment matters,
and commercial or contractual disputes, sometimes related to
acquisitions or divestitures. For example, one of our Argentine
subsidiaries is currently defending against a criminal complaint
alleging the failure to comply with laws requiring the proceeds
of export transactions to be collected, reported
and/or
converted to local currency within specified time periods. As
another example, we are subject to an audit in 11 states of
our practices with respect to the payment of unclaimed property
to those states, which could cover over 30 years. We now
have practices in place which we believe ensure that we pay
unclaimed property as required. We vigorously defend ourselves
against all of these claims. In future periods, we could be
subject to cash costs or charges to earnings if any of these
matters are resolved on unfavorable terms. However, although the
ultimate outcome of any legal matter cannot be predicted with
certainty, based on current information, including our
assessment of the merits of the particular claim, we do not
expect that these legal proceedings or claims will have any
material adverse impact on our future consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
In addition, we are subject to a number of lawsuits initiated by
a significant number of claimants alleging health problems as a
result of exposure to asbestos. In the early 2000s we were
named in nearly 20,000 complaints, most of which were filed in
Mississippi state court and the vast majority of which made no
allegations of exposure to asbestos from our product categories.
Most of these claims have been dismissed and our current docket
of active and inactive cases is less than 500 cases nationwide.
A small number of claims have been asserted by railroad workers
alleging exposure to asbestos products in railroad cars
manufactured by The Pullman Company, one of our subsidiaries.
The balance of the claims is related to alleged exposure to
asbestos in our automotive emission control products. Only a
small percentage of the claimants allege that they were
automobile mechanics and a significant number appear to involve
workers in other industries or otherwise do not include
sufficient information to determine whether there is any basis
for a claim against us. We believe, based on scientific and
other evidence, it is unlikely that mechanics were exposed to
asbestos by our former muffler products and that, in any event,
they would not be at
17
TENNECO
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
increased risk of asbestos-related disease based on their work
with these products. Further, many of these cases involve
numerous defendants, with the number of each in some cases
exceeding 100 defendants from a variety of industries.
Additionally, the plaintiffs either do not specify any, or
specify the jurisdictional minimum, dollar amount for damages.
As major asbestos manufacturers continue to go out of business
or file for bankruptcy, we may experience an increased number of
these claims. We vigorously defend ourselves against these
claims as part of our ordinary course of business. In future
periods, we could be subject to charges to earnings if any of
these matters are resolved unfavorably to us. To date, with
respect to claims that have proceeded sufficiently through the
judicial process, we have regularly achieved favorable
resolutions. Accordingly, we presently believe that these
asbestos-related claims will not have a material adverse impact
on our future consolidated financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows.
We provide warranties on some of our products. The warranty
terms vary but range from one year up to limited lifetime
warranties on some of our premium aftermarket products.
Provisions for estimated expenses related to product warranty
are made at the time products are sold or when specific warranty
issues are identified on OE products. These estimates are
established using historical information about the nature,
frequency, and average cost of warranty claims. We actively
study trends of our warranty claims and take action to improve
product quality and minimize warranty claims. We believe that
the warranty reserve is appropriate; however, actual claims
incurred could differ from the original estimates, requiring
adjustments to the reserve. The reserve is included in both
current and long-term liabilities on the balance sheet.
Below is a table that shows the activity in the warranty accrual
accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
Beginning Balance January 1,
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
Accruals related to product warranties
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Reductions for payments made
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance March 31,
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
TENNECO
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Earnings per share of common stock outstanding were computed as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Millions Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to Tenneco Inc.
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding
|
|
|
59,849,278
|
|
|
|
58,948,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per average share of common stock
|
|
$
|
0.78
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to Tenneco Inc.
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding
|
|
|
59,849,278
|
|
|
|
58,948,351
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock
|
|
|
352,512
|
|
|
|
449,259
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
1,872,733
|
|
|
|
1,413,437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding including
dilutive securities
|
|
|
62,074,523
|
|
|
|
60,811,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per average share of common stock
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase 201,260 and 1,671,083 shares of common
stock were outstanding as of March 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively, but not included in the computation of diluted
earnings per share respectively, because the options were
anti-dilutive.
Equity Plans We have granted a variety of
awards, including common stock, restricted stock, restricted
stock units, performance units, stock appreciation rights
(SARs), and stock options to our directors,
officers, and employees.
Accounting Methods We have recorded
$1 million in compensation expense in each of the quarters
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, related to
nonqualified stock options as part of our selling, general and
administrative expense. This resulted in a decrease of $.01 in
both basic and diluted earnings per share for each of the
quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
We immediately expense stock options and restricted stock
awarded to employees who are eligible to retire. When employees
become eligible to retire during the vesting period, we
recognize the remaining expense associated with their stock
options and restricted stock.
As of March 31, 2011, there was approximately
$7 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to
our stock options awards that we expect to recognize over a
weighted average period of 1.4 years.
Compensation expense for restricted stock, restricted stock
units, long-term performance units and SARs was $4 million
for each of the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010
respectively, and was recorded in selling, general, and
administrative expense on the statement of income.
19
TENNECO
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Cash received from stock option exercises for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was $2 million, and less
than $1 million, respectively. Stock option exercises in
the first three months of 2011 and 2010 would have generated an
excess tax benefit of $1 million and less than
$1 million, respectively. We did not record the excess tax
benefit as we have federal and state net operating losses which
are not currently being utilized.
Assumptions We calculated the fair values of
stock option awards using the Black-Scholes option pricing model
with the weighted average assumptions listed below. The fair
value of share-based awards is determined at the time the awards
are granted which is generally in January of each year, and
requires judgment in estimating employee and market behavior.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
Stock Options Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value, per share
|
|
$
|
26.13
|
|
|
$
|
11.76
|
|
Weighted average assumptions used:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
70.1
|
%
|
|
|
75.37
|
%
|
Expected lives
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Risk-free interest rates
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
Dividend yields
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Expected volatility is calculated based on current implied
volatility and historical realized volatility for the Company.
Expected lives of options are based upon the historical and
expected time to post-vesting forfeiture and exercise. We
believe this method is the best estimate of the future exercise
patterns currently available.
The risk-free interest rates are based upon the Constant
Maturity Rates provided by the U.S. Treasury. For our
valuations, we used the continuous rate with a term equal to the
expected life of the options.
Stock Options The following table reflects
the status and activity for all options to purchase common stock
for the period indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Avg.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted Avg.
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Under
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Life in
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Prices
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
Outstanding Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, January 1, 2011
|
|
|
3,129,241
|
|
|
$
|
14.43
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
201,133
|
|
|
|
45.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(56,046
|
)
|
|
|
3.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(13,184
|
)
|
|
|
9.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(125,624
|
)
|
|
|
17.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, March 31, 2011
|
|
|
3,135,520
|
|
|
$
|
16.53
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
TENNECO
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Restricted Stock The following table reflects
the status for all nonvested restricted shares for the period
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Avg.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Nonvested Restricted Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested balance at January 1, 2011
|
|
|
558,198
|
|
|
$
|
11.58
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
141,036
|
|
|
|
45.42
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(268,891
|
)
|
|
|
12.00
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(4,822
|
)
|
|
|
13.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested balance at March 31, 2011
|
|
|
425,521
|
|
|
$
|
22.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of restricted stock grants is equal to the
average market price of our stock at the date of grant. As of
March 31, 2011, approximately $8 million of total
unrecognized compensation costs related to restricted stock
awards is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average
period of approximately 2.4 years.
Long-Term Performance Units, Restricted Stock Units and
SARs Long-term performance units, restricted
stock units and SARs are paid in cash and recognized as a
liability based upon their fair value. As of March 31,
2011, $15 million of unrecognized compensation costs is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
approximately 1.9 years.
|
|
(10)
|
Pension
Plans, Postretirement and Other Employee Benefits
|
Net periodic pension costs (income) and postretirement benefit
costs (income) consist of the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
US
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
US
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
US
|
|
|
US
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
Service cost benefits earned during the period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net pension and postretirement costs
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, we made pension
contributions of $4 million for our domestic pension plans
and $5 million for our foreign pension plans. Based on
current actuarial estimates, we believe we will be required to
make approximately $35 million in contributions for the
remainder of 2011. Pension contributions beyond 2011 will be
required, but those amounts will vary based upon many factors,
including the performance of our pension fund investments during
2011.
We made postretirement contributions of approximately
$2 million during the first three months of 2011. Based on
current actuarial estimates, we believe we will be required to
make approximately $8 million in contributions for the
remainder of 2011.
21
TENNECO
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
The assets of some of our pension plans are invested in trusts
that permit commingling of the assets of more than one employee
benefit plan for investment and administrative purposes. Each of
the plans participating in the trust has interests in the net
assets of the underlying investment pools of the trusts. The
investments for all our pension plans are recorded at estimated
fair value, in compliance with the recent accounting guidance on
fair value measurement.
In January 2010, we purchased an additional 20 percent
equity interest in our Tenneco Tongtai (Dalian) Exhaust System
Co. Ltd. joint venture investment in China for $15 million
in cash. As a result of this purchase, our equity ownership
percentage of this joint venture investment increased to
80 percent from 60 percent.
We have from time to time issued guarantees for the performance
of obligations by some of our subsidiaries, and some of our
subsidiaries have guaranteed our debt. All of our existing and
future material domestic wholly-owned subsidiaries fully and
unconditionally guarantee our senior credit facility and our
senior notes on a joint and several basis. The arrangement for
the senior credit facility is also secured by first-priority
liens on substantially all our domestic assets and pledges of up
to 66 percent of the stock of certain first-tier foreign
subsidiaries. No assets or capital stock of our direct or
indirect foreign subsidiaries secure our senior notes. For
additional information, refer to Note 14 of the condensed
consolidated financial statements of Tenneco Inc., where we
present the Supplemental Guarantor Condensed Consolidating
Financial Statements.
In March 2011, we entered into two performance guarantee
agreements in the U.K. between Tenneco Management Europe Limited
(TMEL) and the two Walker Group Retirement Plans,
the Walker Group Employee Benefit Plan and the Walker Group
Executive Retirement Benefit Plan (the Walker
Plans), whereby TMEL will guarantee the payment of all
current and future pension contributions in event of a payment
default by the sponsoring or participating employers of the
Walker Plans. As a result of our decision to enter into these
performance guarantee agreements, the levy due to the U.K.
Pension Protection Fund will be reduced. The Walker Plans are
comprised of employees from Tenneco Walker (U.K.) Limited and
our Futaba Tenneco U.K. joint venture. Employer contributions
are funded by both Tenneco Walker (U.K.) Limited, as the
sponsoring employer and Futaba Tenneco U.K., as a participating
employer. The performance guarantee agreements are expected to
remain in effect until all pension obligations for the Walker
Plans sponsoring and participating employers have been
satisfied. The maximum amount payable for these pension
performance guarantees is approximately $26 million as of
March 31, 2011 which is determined by taking
105 percent of the liability of the Walker Plans calculated
under section 179 of the U.K. Pension Act of 2004 offset by
plan assets. We did not record an additional liability in March
2011 for this performance guarantee since Tenneco Walker (U.K.)
Limited, as the sponsoring employer of the Walker Plans, already
recognizes 100 percent of the pension obligation calculated
based on U.S. GAAP, for all of the Walker Plans
participating employers on its balance sheet, which was
$8 million and $9 million at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively. At March 31, 2011,
all pension contributions under the Walker Plans were current
for all of the Walker Plans sponsoring and participating
employers.
We have issued guarantees through letters of credit in
connection with some obligations of our affiliates. As of
March 31, 2011, we have guaranteed $53 million in
letters of credit to support some of our subsidiaries
insurance arrangements, foreign employee benefit programs,
environmental remediation activities and cash management and
capital requirements.
Negotiable Financial Instruments One of our
European subsidiaries receives payment from one of its OE
customers whereby the accounts receivable are satisfied through
the delivery of negotiable financial instruments. We may collect
these financial instruments before their maturity date by either
selling them at a discount or using them to satisfy accounts
receivable that have previously been sold to a European bank.
Any of these financial
22
TENNECO
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
instruments which are not sold are classified as other current
assets. The amount of these financial instruments that was
collected before their maturity date and sold at a discount
totaled $5 million and $6 million at March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. No negotiable
financial instruments were held by our European subsidiary as of
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
In certain instances, several of our Chinese subsidiaries
receive payment from OE customers and satisfy vendor payments
through the receipt and delivery of negotiable financial
instruments. Financial instruments used to satisfy vendor
payables and not redeemed totaled $8 million at both
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively,
and were classified as notes payable. Financial instruments
received from OE customers and not redeemed totaled
$12 million and $11 million at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively. We classify financial
instruments received from our OE customers as other current
assets if issued by a financial institution of our customers or
as customer notes and accounts, net if issued by our customer.
We classified $12 million and $11 million in other
current assets at March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010, respectively. Some of our Chinese subsidiaries that issue
their own negotiable financial instruments to pay vendors are
required to maintain a cash balance if they exceed certain
credit limits with the financial institution that guarantees
those financial instruments. A restricted cash balance was not
required at those Chinese subsidiaries at March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010, respectively.
The negotiable financial instruments received by one of our
European subsidiaries and some of our Chinese subsidiaries are
checks drawn by our OE customers and guaranteed by their banks
that are payable at a future date. The use of these instruments
for payment follows local commercial practice. Because
negotiable financial instruments are financial obligations of
our customers and are guaranteed by our customers banks,
we believe they represent a lower financial risk than the
outstanding accounts receivable that they satisfy which are not
guaranteed by a bank.
23
TENNECO
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
We are a global manufacturer with three geographic reportable
segments: (1) North America, (2) Europe, South America
and India (Europe), and (3) Asia Pacific. Each
segment manufactures and distributes ride control and emission
control products primarily for the automotive industry. We have
not aggregated individual operating segments within these
reportable segments. We evaluate segment performance based
primarily on earnings before interest expense, income taxes, and
noncontrolling interests. Products are transferred between
segments and geographic areas on a basis intended to reflect as
nearly as possible the market value of the products.
The following table summarizes certain Tenneco Inc. segment
information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
Reclass &
|
|
|
|
|
America
|
|
Europe
|
|
Pacific
|
|
Elims
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
At March 31, 2011 and for the Three Months Then Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
851
|
|
|
$
|
741
|
|
|
$
|
168
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,760
|
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before interest expense, income taxes, and
noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,469
|
|
|
|
1,498
|
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
3,532
|
|
At March 31, 2010 and for the Three Months Then Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
605
|
|
|
$
|
561
|
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,316
|
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before interest expense, income taxes, and
noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,242
|
|
|
|
1,365
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
3,034
|
|
|
|
(14)
|
Supplemental
Guarantor Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements
|
Basis of
Presentation
Subject to limited exceptions, all of our existing and future
material domestic 100% owned subsidiaries (which are referred to
as the Guarantor Subsidiaries) fully and unconditionally
guarantee our senior notes due in 2015, 2018, and 2020 on a
joint and several basis. The Guarantor Subsidiaries are combined
in the presentation below.
These consolidating financial statements are presented on the
equity method. Under this method, our investments are recorded
at cost and adjusted for our ownership share of a
subsidiarys cumulative results of operations, capital
contributions and distributions, and other equity changes. You
should read the condensed consolidating financial information of
the Guarantor Subsidiaries in connection with our condensed
consolidated financial statements and related notes of which
this note is an integral part.
Distributions
There are no significant restrictions on the ability of the
Guarantor Subsidiaries to make distributions to us.
24
TENNECO
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
STATEMENT
OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenneco Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Nonguarantor
|
|
|
(Parent
|
|
|
Reclass &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Company)
|
|
|
Elims
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales and operating revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External
|
|
$
|
773
|
|
|
$
|
987
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,760
|
|
Affiliated companies
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
|
|
1,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown
below)
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
|
|
1,466
|
|
Engineering, research, and development
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of other intangibles
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
790
|
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
|
|
1,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before interest expense, income taxes,
noncontrolling interests and equity in net income from
affiliated companies
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External (net of interest capitalized)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Affiliated companies (net of interest income)
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Equity in net income (loss) from affiliated companies
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Tenneco Inc.
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
(106
|
)
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
TENNECO
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
STATEMENT
OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenneco Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Nonguarantor
|
|
|
(Parent
|
|
|
Reclass &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Company)
|
|
|
Elims
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales and operating revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External
|
|
$
|
543
|
|
|
$
|
773
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,316
|
|
Affiliated companies
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
|
882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
1,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown
below)
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
Engineering, research, and development
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of other intangibles
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
1,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Other income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before interest expense, income taxes,
noncontrolling interests, and equity in net income from
affiliated companies
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External (net of interest capitalized)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Affiliated companies (net of interest income)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Equity in net income (loss) from affiliated companies
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Tenneco Inc.
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
(61
|
)
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
TENNECO
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
BALANCE
SHEET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenneco Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Nonguarantor
|
|
|
(Parent
|
|
|
Reclass
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Company)
|
|
|
& Elims
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
197
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
199
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
1,318
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
(677
|
)
|
|
|
1,090
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
637
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
39
|
|
Prepayments and other
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
|
2,037
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
(710
|
)
|
|
|
2,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in affiliated companies
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
784
|
|
|
|
(1,253
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Notes and advances receivable from affiliates
|
|
|
4,137
|
|
|
|
938
|
|
|
|
5,914
|
|
|
|
(10,989
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term receivables, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
Intangibles, net
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
Other
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,719
|
|
|
|
1,105
|
|
|
|
6,749
|
|
|
|
(12,242
|
)
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant, property, and equipment, at cost
|
|
|
989
|
|
|
|
2,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,208
|
|
Less Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(711
|
)
|
|
|
(1,425
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,136
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
5,776
|
|
|
$
|
3,936
|
|
|
$
|
6,772
|
|
|
$
|
(12,952
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt (including current maturities of
long-term
debt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt non-affiliated
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
146
|
|
Short-term debt affiliated
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(554
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
Accrued taxes
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Other
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
794
|
|
|
|
1,583
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
(710
|
)
|
|
|
1,729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt non-affiliated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
1,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,185
|
|
Long-term debt affiliated
|
|
|
4,601
|
|
|
|
971
|
|
|
|
5,417
|
|
|
|
(10,989
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
Postretirement benefits and other liabilities
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
5,735
|
|
|
|
2,706
|
|
|
|
6,653
|
|
|
|
(11,695
|
)
|
|
|
3,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenneco Inc. Shareholders equity
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
1,173
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
(1,257
|
)
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
1,216
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
(1,257
|
)
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interests and equity
|
|
$
|
5,776
|
|
|
$
|
3,936
|
|
|
$
|
6,772
|
|
|
$
|
(12,952
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
TENNECO
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
BALANCE
SHEET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenneco Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Nonguarantor
|
|
|
(Parent
|
|
|
Reclass
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Company)
|
|
|
& Elims
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
233
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
233
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
1,106
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
(706
|
)
|
|
|
826
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
38
|
|
Prepayments and other
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
1,776
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
(771
|
)
|
|
|
1,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in affiliated companies
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
707
|
|
|
|
(1,098
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Notes and advances receivable from affiliates
|
|
|
4,119
|
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
5,853
|
|
|
|
(10,760
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term receivables, net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
Intangibles, net
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Other
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,610
|
|
|
|
948
|
|
|
|
6,627
|
|
|
|
(11,858
|
)
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant, property, and equipment, at cost
|
|
|
997
|
|
|
|
2,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,109
|
|
Less Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(713
|
)
|
|
|
(1,346
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,059
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
5,655
|
|
|
$
|
3,490
|
|
|
$
|
6,651
|
|
|
$
|
(12,629
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt (including current maturities of
long-term
debt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt non-affiliated
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
Short-term debt affiliated
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(595
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
1,048
|
|
Accrued taxes
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Other
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
1,450
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
(771
|
)
|
|
|
1,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt non-affiliated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
1,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,160
|
|
Long-term debt affiliated
|
|
|
4,583
|
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
5,409
|
|
|
|
(10,760
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Postretirement benefits and other liabilities
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
5,661
|
|
|
|
2,370
|
|
|
|
6,616
|
|
|
|
(11,527
|
)
|
|
|
3,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenneco Inc. Shareholders equity
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(1,102
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
1,108
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(1,102
|
)
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interests and equity
|
|
$
|
5,655
|
|
|
$
|
3,490
|
|
|
$
|
6,651
|
|
|
$
|
(12,629
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
TENNECO
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
STATEMENT
OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenneco Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Nonguarantor
|
|
|
(Parent
|
|
|
Reclass
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Company)
|
|
|
& Elims
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
(160
|
)
|
|
$
|
(49
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Cash payments for plant, property, and equipment
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
Cash payments for software related intangible assets
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in bank overdrafts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in revolver borrowings and short-term
debt excluding current maturities of long-term debt and
short-term borrowings secured by accounts receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings secured by
accounts receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
Intercompany dividends and net increase (decrease) in
intercompany obligations
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, January 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, March 31 (Note)
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
197
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: |
Cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid investments with
a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase.
|
29
TENNECO
INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
STATEMENT
OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenneco Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Nonguarantor
|
|
|
(Parent
|
|
|
Reclass
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Company)
|
|
|
& Elims
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
(36
|
)
|
|
$
|
(49
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Cash payments for plant, property, and equipment
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
Cash payments for software related intangible assets
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Investments and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Debt issuance cost on long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in bank overdrafts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Net increase (decrease) in revolver borrowings and short-term
debt excluding current maturities of long-term debt and
short-term borrowings secured by accounts receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings secured by
accounts receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
Intercompany dividends and net increase (decrease) in
intercompany obligations
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution to noncontrolling interests partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, January 1
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, March 31 (Note)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
193
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: |
Cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid investments with
a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase.
|
30
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
As you read the following review of our financial condition and
results of operations, you should also read our condensed
consolidated financial statements and related notes beginning on
page 5.
Executive
Summary
We are one of the worlds leading manufacturers of
automotive emission control and ride control products and
systems for light, commercial and specialty vehicle
applications. We serve both original equipment (OE) vehicle
designers and manufacturers and the repair and replacement
markets, or aftermarket, globally through leading brands,
including
Monroe®,
Rancho®,
Clevite®
Elastomers,
Marzocchi®
and Fric
Rottm
ride control products and
Walker®,
Fonostm,
and
Gillettm
emission control products. We serve more than 64 different
original equipment manufacturers, and our products or systems
are included on nine of the top 10 passenger models produced in
Europe and nine of the top 10 light truck models produced in
North America for 2010. Our aftermarket customers are comprised
of full-line and specialty warehouse distributors, retailers,
jobbers, installer chains and car dealers. As of
December 31, 2010, we operated 86 manufacturing facilities
worldwide and employed approximately 22,000 people to
service our customers demands.
Factors that continue to be critical to our success include
winning new business awards, managing our overall global
manufacturing footprint to ensure proper placement and workforce
levels in line with business needs, maintaining competitive
wages and benefits, maximizing efficiencies in manufacturing
processes and reducing overall costs. In addition, our ability
to adapt to key industry trends, such as a shift in consumer
preferences to other vehicles in response to higher fuel costs
and other economic and social factors, increasing
technologically sophisticated content, changing aftermarket
distribution channels, increasing environmental standards and
extended product life of automotive parts, also play a critical
role in our success. Other factors that are critical to our
success include adjusting to economic challenges such as
increases in the cost of raw materials and our ability to
successfully reduce the impact of any such cost increases
through material substitutions, cost reduction initiatives and
other methods.
Light vehicle production in 2010 continued to strengthen in all
regions in which we operate, from the recession that began in
2008. North American light vehicle production was up
39 percent from 2009, while in Europe, light vehicle
production in 2010 was up 15 percent from 2009. For the
first quarter of 2011, light vehicle production has continued to
improve in most geographic regions in which we operate. Light
vehicle production was up 13 percent in North America,
10 percent in Europe and seven percent in China.
We have a substantial amount of indebtedness. As such, our
ability to generate cash both to fund operations and
service our debt is also a significant area of focus
for our company. See Liquidity and Capital Resources
below for further discussion of cash flows and Item 1A,
Risk Factors included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Total revenues for the first quarter of 2011 were
$1,760 million, a 34 percent increase from
$1,316 million in the first quarter of 2010. Excluding the
impact of currency and substrate sales, revenue was up
$244 million, or 23 percent, driven primarily by
higher OE production in most geographic regions in which we
operate, our strong positions on some of the best-selling
vehicle platforms globally, higher aftermarket sales globally
and new launches of light and commercial vehicle programs.
31
Cost of sales: Cost of sales for the first quarter of 2011 was
$1,466 million, or 83.3 percent of sales, compared to
$1,073 million, or 81.5 percent of sales in the first
quarter of 2010. The following table lists the primary drivers
behind the change in cost of sales ($ millions).
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
1,073
|
|
Volume and mix
|
|
|
326
|
|
Material
|
|
|
22
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
38
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Other Costs
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2011
|
|
$
|
1,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in cost of sales was due primarily to the
year-over-year
increase in production volumes, the impact of foreign currency,
and higher material and other costs, mainly manufacturing.
Gross margin: Gross margin for the first three months of 2011
was 16.7 percent, down 1.8 percentage points from 18.5 percent
in the first three months of 2010. The gross margin decline was
primarily driven by a higher mix of OE revenues, higher
substrate sales and the negative margin impact of material cost
recoveries, which together had a 1.7 percentage point impact on
gross margin. The remaining effects on gross margin resulting
from higher volumes, lower restructuring and related expenses,
unfavorable currency and pricing, primarily related to
contractual price reductions, largely offset each other.
Engineering, research and development: Engineering, research and
development expense was $35 million and $27 million in
the first quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Increased
spending to support customer programs, technology applications,
and growth in emerging markets, drove the increase in expense
year-over-year.
Selling, general and administrative: Selling, general and
administrative expense was up $9 million in the first
quarter of 2011, at $109 million, compared to
$100 million in the first quarter of 2010. Investments in
new facilities in China and Thailand primarily drove the
increase in expense
year-over-year.
Depreciation and amortization: Depreciation and amortization
expense in the first three months of 2011 was $51 million,
compared to $55 million in the first three months of 2010.
Included in 2010 was $1 million of restructuring and
related expenses.
Goodwill impairment: There were no goodwill impairment charges
in either first quarter of 2011 or 2010.
Earnings before interest expense, taxes and noncontrolling
interests (EBIT) was $94 million for the first
quarter of 2011, an improvement of $35 million, when
compared to $59 million in the first quarter of 2010.
Higher OE revenues, stronger margins on new light and commercial
vehicle launches, lower depreciation and amortization expense,
decreased restructuring and related costs, and higher
aftermarket sales drove the
year-over-year
increase to EBIT. Partially offsetting the increase were higher
selling, general, administrative and engineering spending,
$1 million of negative currency and unfavorable pricing,
primarily related to contractual price reductions.
Results
from Operations
Net
Sales and Operating Revenues for the Three Months Ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010
The following tables reflect our revenues for 2011 and 2010. We
present these reconciliations of revenues in order to reflect
the trend in our sales in various product lines and geographic
regions separately from the effects of doing business in
currencies other than the U.S. dollar. We have not
reflected any currency impact in the 2010 table since this is
the base period for measuring the effects of currency during
2011 on our operations. We believe investors find this
information useful in understanding
period-to-period
comparisons in our revenues.
Additionally, we show the component of our revenue represented
by substrate sales in the following tables. While we generally
have primary design, engineering and manufacturing
responsibility for OE emission control systems, we do not
manufacture substrates. Substrates are porous ceramic filters
coated with a catalyst precious metals such as
platinum, palladium and rhodium. These are supplied to us by
Tier 2 suppliers as directed by our OE
32
customers. We generally earn a small margin on these components
of the system. As the need for more sophisticated emission
control solutions increases to meet more stringent environmental
regulations, and as we capture more diesel aftertreatment
business, these substrate components have been increasing as a
percentage of our revenue. While these substrates dilute our
gross margin percentage, they are a necessary component of an
emission control system. We view the growth of substrates as a
key indicator that our value-add content in an emission control
system is moving toward the higher technology hot-end gas and
diesel business.
Our value-add content in an emission control system includes
designing the system to meet environmental regulations through
integration of the substrates into the system, maximizing use of
thermal energy to heat up the catalyst quickly, efficiently
managing airflow to reduce back pressure as the exhaust stream
moves past the catalyst, managing the expansion and contraction
of the emission control system components due to temperature
extremes experienced by an emission control system, using
advanced acoustic engineering tools to design the desired
exhaust sound, minimizing the opportunity for the fragile
components of the substrate to be damaged when we integrate it
into the emission control system and reducing unwanted noise,
vibration and harshness transmitted through the emission control
system.
We present these substrate sales separately in the following
table because we believe investors utilize this information to
understand the impact of this portion of our revenues on our
overall business and because it removes the impact of
potentially volatile precious metals pricing from our revenues.
While our original equipment customers generally assume the risk
of precious metals pricing volatility, it impacts our reported
revenues. Excluding substrate catalytic converter
and diesel particulate filter sales removes this impact.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substrate
|
|
|
Excluding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
Currency and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Excluding
|
|
|
Excluding
|
|
|
Substrate
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Impact
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
North America Original Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ride Control
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
Emission Control
|
|
|
526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
526
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total North America Original Equipment
|
|
|
678
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
North America Aftermarket
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ride Control
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
Emission Control
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total North America Aftermarket
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
Total North America
|
|
|
851
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
847
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
Europe Original Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ride Control
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
Emission Control
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Europe Original Equipment
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
496
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
374
|
|
Europe Aftermarket
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ride Control
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Emission Control
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Europe Aftermarket
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
South America & India
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
Total Europe, South America & India
|
|
|
741
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Asia Pacific
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Tenneco
|
|
$
|
1,760
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
1,718
|
|
|
$
|
419
|
|
|
$
|
1,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substrate
|
|
|
Excluding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
Currency and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Excluding
|
|
|
Excluding
|
|
|
Substrate
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Impact
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
North America Original Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ride Control
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
Emission Control
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total North America Original Equipment
|
|
|
454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
454
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
North America Aftermarket
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ride Control
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
Emission Control
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total North America Aftermarket
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
Total North America
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
Europe Original Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ride Control
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
Emission Control
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Europe Original Equipment
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
Europe Aftermarket
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ride Control
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Emission Control
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Europe Aftermarket
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
South America & India
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
Total Europe, South America & India
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
462
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Asia Pacific
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Tenneco
|
|
$
|
1,316
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,316
|
|
|
$
|
261
|
|
|
$
|
1,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
Versus Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Dollar and Percent Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substrate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
(Millions Except Percent Amounts)
|
|
|
North America Original Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ride Control
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
Emission Control
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total North America Original Equipment
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
North America Aftermarket
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ride Control
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
Emission Control
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total North America Aftermarket
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
Total North America
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
Europe Original Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ride Control
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
Emission Control
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Europe Original Equipment
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
Europe Aftermarket
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ride Control
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Emission Control
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Europe Aftermarket
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
South America & India
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
Total Europe, South America & India
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
Asia
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
Australia
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Asia Pacific
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Tenneco
|
|
$
|
444
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
$
|
244
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Light Vehicle Industry Production by Region for Three
Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (According to
IHS Automotive, April, 2011)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
% Increase
|
|
|
|
(Number of Vehicles in Thousands)
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
3,261
|
|
|
|
2,894
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
5,310
|
|
|
|
4,841
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
South America
|
|
|
991
|
|
|
|
921
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
India
|
|
|
949
|
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Europe, South America & India
|
|
|
7,250
|
|
|
|
6,541
|
|
|
|
709
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China
|
|
|
4,496
|
|
|
|
4,184
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)%
|
North American light vehicle production increased
13 percent, while industry Class 8 commercial vehicle
production was up 56 percent and industry
Class 4-7
commercial vehicle production was up five percent in the first
35
quarter of 2011 when compared to the first quarter of 2010.
Revenues from our North American operations increased in the
first three months of 2011 compared to last years first
three months due to higher OE and aftermarket sales of both
product lines. The increase in North American OE revenues was
primarily driven by improved production volumes, which accounted
for $221 million of the
year-over-year
change in revenues, on Tenneco-supplied vehicles such as the
Ford Super-Duty
pick-up,
GMs crossover models and the Toyota Tundra. Also
contributing to the increase were incremental commercial vehicle
revenues and a favorable $2 million currency impact on OE
revenue
year-over-year.
The increase in aftermarket revenue for North America was
primarily due to higher customer demand in both product lines
which resulted in a combined increase in revenue of
$20 million. Favorable currency impacted aftermarket
revenue by $2 million year-over-year.
Our European, South American and Indian segments revenues
increased in the first quarter of 2011 compared to last
years first quarter, due to increased sales in all
European business units as well as in South America and India.
The first quarter total European light vehicle industry
production was up 10 percent, while industry Class 8
commercial vehicle production was up 52 percent and
industry
Class 4-7
commercial vehicle production was up 44 percent in the
first three months of 2011 when compared to the first three
months of 2010. Improved volumes due to higher OE production on
platforms such as the VW Golf, BMW 1 and 3 Series and the
Daimler Sprinter were the primary driver of our increased Europe
OE revenues and contributed to an increase in revenue of
$100 million. European OE revenue also benefited compared
to last year, from improved pricing, mainly material cost
recovery and favorable foreign currency which had a combined
impact of $30 million. Excluding currency, European
aftermarket revenues improved compared to last year on higher
ride control sales volumes which had a $6 million impact,
tied in part to heavy duty sales, as well as higher emission
control sales volumes of $3 million. Light vehicle
production increased eight percent in South America and
22 percent in India for the first quarter of 2011 when
compared to the first quarter of 2010. South American and Indian
revenues were higher in the first quarter of 2011 when compared
to the prior years first quarter primarily due to stronger
OE and aftermarket volumes in both regions, which increased
revenue by $32 million. Currency also added $7 million
to South American and Indian revenue.
Industry light vehicle production for 2011 in the first quarter
increased seven percent in China but decreased 15 percent
in Australia
year-over-year.
Revenues from our Asia Pacific segment, which includes Australia
and Asia, increased due to higher sales in Asia. Asian revenues
for 2011 improved from last year, primarily due to
$14 million from stronger production volumes, particularly
in China on key Tenneco-supplied GM, VW and Nissan platforms. A
$6 million negative impact on revenue due to lower OE
production volumes drove the first quarter 2011 revenue decrease
for Australia over the first quarter of 2010. Currency benefited
revenue by $5 million each in Asia and Australia.
Earnings
before Interest Expense, Income Taxes and Noncontrolling
Interests (EBIT) for the Three Months Ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
Europe, South America and India
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
The EBIT results shown in the preceding table include the
following items, discussed below under Restructuring and
Other Charges and Liquidity and Capital
Resources Capitalization, which have an effect
on the comparability of EBIT results between periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and related expenses
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Europe, South America and India
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and related expenses
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and related expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT for North American operations was $62 million in the
first quarter of 2011, an increase of $26 million from
$36 million in the first quarter one year ago. The benefits
to EBIT from higher OE revenues, stronger margins on new light
and commercial vehicle launches, lower depreciation and
amortization expense and improved aftermarket revenues were
partially offset by unfavorable pricing, mainly contractual
price reductions, increased material spending and higher
selling, general, administrative and engineering costs. There
were no restructuring and related expenses in the first three
months of 2011 compared to $4 million of restructuring and
related expenses in the first three months of 2010.
Our European, South American and Indian segments EBIT was
$24 million for the first quarter of 2011, up
$12 million from $12 million in the first quarter of
2010. The increase was driven by higher OE production volumes
and the related manufacturing efficiencies, new platform
launches, higher aftermarket sales and material cost management
activities. Unfavorable pricing, mainly contractual price
reductions and increased selling, general, and administrative
costs partially offset the increase. Restructuring and related
expenses of $1 million were included in EBIT for the first
three months of both 2011 and 2010.
EBIT for our Asia Pacific segment, which includes Asia and
Australia, decreased $3 million to $8 million in the
first quarter of 2011 from $11 million in the prior
years first quarter. The EBIT improvement from higher
volumes and material cost management in Asia were more than
offset by volume declines in Australia, unfavorable pricing,
mainly contractual price reductions, and increased selling,
general, administrative costs to support new plants in China and
Thailand and engineering costs to support growth projects in
these markets and Japan. Currency had a $1 million
unfavorable impact on 2011 EBIT for our Asia Pacific segment.
Currency had a $1 million unfavorable impact on overall
company EBIT for 2011 as compared to the prior year.
EBIT
as a Percentage of Revenue for the Three Months Ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
North America
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
Europe, South America & India
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Total Tenneco
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
In North America, EBIT as a percentage of revenue for the first
quarter of 2011 was up one percentage point when compared to
last years first quarter. The increase in EBIT from higher
OE revenues, new platform launches, lower depreciation and
amortization expense, higher aftermarket revenues and decreased
restructuring and related charges was partially offset as a
percentage of revenue by unfavorable pricing, increased material
spending and higher selling, general, administrative and
engineering costs. In Europe, South America and India, EBIT
margin for the first three months of 2011 was one percentage
point higher than the prior years first three
37
months due to improved volumes, the related manufacturing
efficiencies, new platform launches, material cost management
actions, and higher aftermarket revenues partially offset by
unfavorable pricing and increased selling, general, and
administrative expenses. EBIT as a percentage of revenue for our
Asia Pacific segment decreased two percentage points in the
first quarter of 2011 versus the prior years first quarter
as higher volumes and material cost management activities in
Asia were more than offset as a percentage of revenue by
decreased volumes in Australia, unfavorable pricing, increased
selling, general, administrative and engineering expenses and
the negative impact of currency.
Interest
Expense, Net of Interest Capitalized
We reported interest expense in the first quarter of 2011 of
$28 million net of interest capitalized of $1 million
($27 million in our U.S. operations and
$1 million in our foreign operations), down from
$32 million net of interest capitalized of $1 million
($31 million in our U.S. operations and
$1 million in our foreign operations) in the first quarter
of 2010. Included in the first three months of 2011 was
$1 million of expense related to our refinancing
activities. Excluding the refinancing expenses, interest expense
decreased in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the first
quarter of the prior year as a result of our lower average
borrowings due to our operating cash performance and lower rates
due to last years debt refinancing transactions.
On March 31, 2011, we had $990 million in long-term
debt obligations that have fixed interest rates. Of that amount,
$500 million is fixed through December 2020,
$250 million is fixed through November 2015,
$225 million is fixed through August 2018 and the remainder
is fixed from 2011 through 2025. We also have $198 million
in long-term debt obligations that are subject to variable
interest rates. For more detailed explanations on our debt
structure and senior credit facility refer to Liquidity
and Capital Resources Capitalization later in
this Managements Discussion and Analysis.
Income
Taxes
Income tax expense was $14 million for the first quarter of
2011. The tax expense recorded for the first quarter 2011
differs from a statutory rate of 35 percent due to a net
tax benefit of $10 million primarily related to
U.S. taxable income with no associated tax expense due to
our net operating loss position and income generated in lower
tax rate jurisdictions, partially offset by the impact of
recording a valuation allowance against the tax benefit for
losses in certain foreign jurisdictions. In the first quarter of
2010, we recorded income tax expense of $15 million. The
tax expense recorded differs from the expense that would have
been recorded using a statutory rate of 35 percent because
of $5 million in non-cash tax charges related to
adjustments to prior year income tax estimates and the impact of
not benefiting tax losses in the U.S. and certain foreign
jurisdictions offset by a favorable mix of tax rates in the
jurisdictions we pay taxes.
Restructuring
and Other Charges
Over the past several years, we have adopted plans to
restructure portions of our operations. These plans were
approved by our Board of Directors and were designed to reduce
operational and administrative overhead costs throughout the
business. In 2010, we incurred $19 million in restructuring
and related costs, of which $14 million was recorded in
cost of sales and $5 million was recorded in depreciation
and amortization expense. In the first quarter of 2011, we
incurred $1 million in restructuring and related costs, all
of which was recorded in cost of sales.
Amounts related to activities that are part of our restructuring
plans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
Impact of
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
Cash
|
|
Exchange
|
|
Reserve
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
Reserve
|
|
Payments
|
|
Rates
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
Reserve
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
Severance
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
38
Under the terms of our amended and extended senior credit
agreement that took effect on June 3, 2010, we are allowed
to exclude $60 million of cash charges and expenses, before
taxes, related to cost reduction initiatives incurred after
June 3, 2010 from the calculation of the financial covenant
ratios required under our senior credit facility. As of
March 31, 2011, we have excluded $10 million in
cumulative allowable charges relating to restructuring
initiatives against the $60 million available under the
terms of the senior credit facility.
On September 22, 2009, we announced that we will be closing
our original equipment ride control plant in Cozad, Nebraska. We
estimate this closing will generate $8 million in
annualized cost savings once completed, incremental to the
$58 million of savings related to our October 2008
restructuring announcement. Approximately 500 positions will be
eliminated at the Cozad plant and we expect that by
June 30, 2011 95 percent of those positions will have
been eliminated. We plan to hire at other facilities as we move
production from Cozad to those facilities, resulting in a net
decrease of approximately 60 positions. We originally planned to
have completed the closing of this facility by the end of 2010,
however, as a result of increased customer demand and to better
optimize the transfer of some of the manufacturing activities,
we plan to supply certain of our other facilities with
components from Cozad to support this increased demand until
capacity adjustments are completed at our other facilities.
During 2009 and 2010, we recorded $11 million and
$10 million, respectively, of restructuring and related
expenses related to this initiative, of which approximately
$16 million represents cash expenditures. We do not expect
that we will incur any additional restructuring and related
expenses related to this initiative.
Earnings
Per Share
We reported net income attributable to Tenneco Inc. of
$47 million or $0.75 per diluted common share for the first
quarter of 2011. Included in the first quarter results for 2011
were negative impacts from expenses related to our restructuring
activities and costs related to our refinancing activities,
which were more than offset by net tax benefits. The net impact
of these items increased earnings per diluted share by $0.12. We
reported net income attributable to Tenneco Inc. of
$7 million or $0.11 per diluted common share for the first
quarter of 2010. Included in the first quarter results for 2010
were negative impacts from expenses related to our restructuring
activities and tax adjustments. The net impact of these items
decreased earnings per diluted share by $0.14.
Dividends
on Common Stock
On January 10, 2001, our Board of Directors eliminated the
quarterly dividend on our common stock. There are no current
plans to reinstate a dividend on our common stock.
Cash
Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
Cash provided (used) by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
(103
|
)
|
|
$
|
(57
|
)
|
Investing activities
|
|
$
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
Operating
Activities
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, operating
activities used $103 million in cash compared to
$57 million in cash used during the same period last year.
Our cash flow from operations is seasonal with a greater use of
cash in the first quarter as we prepare for OE platform launches
and the aftermarket selling season. For the
39
first quarter of 2011, cash used for working capital was
$187 million versus $112 million of cash used for
working capital in the same period of 2010. Receivables were a
use of cash of $251 million in the first three months of
2011 compared to a cash use of $191 million in the prior
years first three months. The change in cash flow from
receivables was primarily due to higher
year-over-year
sales. Inventory represented a cash outflow of $77 million
during the first quarter of 2011, compared to a cash outflow of
$44 million for the same period of the prior year. The
year-over-year
change to cash flow from inventory was primarily a result of
higher production levels. The higher production environment also
led to accounts payable providing cash of $139 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2011, compared to cash
provided of $120 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2010. Cash taxes were $10 million for the
first quarter of 2011 compared to $8 million in the first
quarter of the prior year.
One of our European subsidiaries receives payment from one of
its OE customers whereby the accounts receivable are satisfied
through the delivery of negotiable financial instruments. We may
collect these financial instruments before their maturity date
by either selling them at a discount or using them to satisfy
accounts receivable that have previously been sold to a European
bank. Any of these financial instruments which are not sold are
classified as other current assets. The amount of these
financial instruments that was collected before their maturity
date and sold at a discount totaled $5 million and
$6 million at March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010, respectively. No negotiable financial instruments were
held by our European subsidiary as of March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively.
In certain instances, several of our Chinese subsidiaries
receive payment from OE customers and satisfy vendor payments
through the receipt and delivery of negotiable financial
instruments. Financial instruments used to satisfy vendor
payables and not redeemed totaled $8 million at both
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively,
and were classified as notes payable. Financial instruments
received from OE customers and not redeemed totaled
$12 million and $11 million at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively. We classify financial
instruments received from our OE customers as other current
assets if issued by a financial institution of our customers or
as customer notes and accounts, net if issued by our customer.
We classified $12 million and $11 million in other
current assets at March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010, respectively. Some of our Chinese subsidiaries that issue
their own negotiable financial instruments to pay vendors are
required to maintain a cash balance if they exceed certain
credit limits with the financial institution that guarantees
those financial instruments. A restricted cash balance was not
required at those Chinese subsidiaries at March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010, respectively.
The negotiable financial instruments received by one of our
European subsidiaries and some of our Chinese subsidiaries are
checks drawn by our OE customers and guaranteed by their banks
that are payable at a future date. The use of these instruments
for payment follows local commercial practice. Because
negotiable financial instruments are financial obligations of
our customers and are guaranteed by our customers banks,
we believe they represent a lower financial risk than the
outstanding accounts receivable that they satisfy which are not
guaranteed by a bank.
Investing
Activities
Cash used for investing activities was $7 million higher in
the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period a year
ago. Cash payments for plant, property and equipment were
$46 million in the first quarter of 2011 versus payments of
$38 million in the first quarter of 2010, an increase of
$8 million. This increase was due to investments for new
business launches, technology development and future growth
opportunities. Cash payments for software-related intangible
assets were $3 million in the first three months of 2011
compared to $2 million in the first three months of 2010.
Financing
Activities
Cash flow from financing activities was an inflow of
$114 million for the quarter ending March 31, 2011
compared to an inflow of $118 million for the quarter
ending March 31, 2010. Borrowings under our revolving
credit facility were $47 million in the first quarter of
2011 and zero in the prior year first quarter. At March 31,
2011, there were $82 million in borrowings outstanding
under the North American accounts receivable securitization
programs compared to $126 million at March 31, 2010.
40
Outlook
Industry production in the second quarter will see some impact
from the crisis in Japan. Prior to these events, IHS Automotive
forecasted a 9 percent increase in light vehicle production in
the regions where Tenneco operates. However, the current
forecast, while still up in most regions, has been adjusted to
an overall 3 percent increase in light vehicle production to
account for temporary customer disruptions. This includes an 11
percent year-over-year increase in North America, 6 percent in
China, 16 percent in India and 7 percent in South America. The
Japan impact has now lowered Europe production estimates to a 6
percent year-over-year decrease in the second quarter but still
up for the year. In addition, weaker industry conditions,
separate from the Japan crisis, are continuing in Australia with
a forecasted 3 percent decline.
Despite the temporary disruptions to customer production,
volumes are expected to recover by the end of the year.
According to IHS Automotive, full-year production in the regions
where we operate is still predicted to increase 7 percent versus
last year, unchanged from previous forecasts.
On the commercial vehicle side of our business, we are launching
diesel aftertreatment programs with 13 commercial vehicle
and engine manufacturers globally through 2012. These programs
are launching in North America, Europe, China and South America.
We are adding Daimler and MAN, both in South America, to our
list of nine previously announced commercial vehicle customers.
In addition we expect our global aftermarket to be a stable
contributor. We recently announced new aftermarket business in
North America with seven customers, which is expected to
generate more than $15 million in annual revenue. In the
second quarter of this year, we expect to incur $12 million
in changeover costs, primarily in the form of customer credits
related to this new business. The new customers will apply these
credits as payment for the initial shipments of Tenneco products
used to replace our competitors products at the customers
locations.
Critical
Accounting Policies
We prepare our condensed consolidated financial statements in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. Preparing our condensed consolidated
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles requires us to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements
and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. The following paragraphs include a discussion
of some critical areas where estimates are required.
Revenue
Recognition
We recognize revenue for sales to our original equipment and
aftermarket customers when title and risk of loss passes to the
customers under the terms of our arrangements with those
customers, which is usually at the time of shipment from our
plants or distribution centers. Generally, in connection with
the sale of exhaust systems to certain original equipment
manufacturers, we purchase catalytic converters and diesel
particulate filters or components thereof including precious
metals (substrates) on behalf of our customers which
are used in the assembled system. These substrates are included
in our inventory and passed through to the customer
at our cost, plus a small margin, since we take title to the
inventory and are responsible for both the delivery and quality
of the finished product. Revenues recognized for substrate sales
were $423 million, and $261 million for the first
three months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. For our aftermarket
customers, we provide for promotional incentives and returns at
the time of sale. Estimates are based upon the terms of the
incentives and historical experience with returns. Certain taxes
assessed by governmental authorities on revenue producing
transactions, such as value added taxes, are excluded from
revenue and recorded on a net basis. Shipping and handling costs
billed to customers are included in revenues and the related
costs are included in cost of sales in our Statements of Income.
Warranty
Reserves
Where we have offered product warranty, we also provide for
warranty costs. Provisions for estimated expenses related to
product warranty are made at the time products are sold or when
specific warranty issues are identified on OE products. These
estimates are established using historical information about the
nature, frequency,
41
and average cost of warranty claims and upon specific warranty
issues as they arise. The warranty terms vary but range from one
year up to limited lifetime warranties on some of our premium
aftermarket products. We actively study trends of our warranty
claims and take action to improve product quality and minimize
warranty claims. While we have not experienced any material
differences between these estimates and our actual costs, it is
reasonably possible that future warranty issues could arise that
could have a significant impact on our condensed consolidated
financial statements.
Pre-production
Design and Development and Tooling Assets
We expense pre-production design and development costs as
incurred unless we have a contractual guarantee for
reimbursement from the original equipment customer. Unbilled
pre-production design and development costs recorded in
prepayments and other and long-term receivables totaled $17 and
$15 million at March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010, respectively. In addition, plant, property and equipment
included $37 million and $38 million at March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, for original
equipment tools and dies that we own, and prepayments and other
included $51 million and $46 million at March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, for in-process
tools and dies that we are building for our original equipment
customers.
Income
Taxes
We evaluate our deferred income taxes quarterly to determine if
valuation allowances are required or should be adjusted.
U.S. GAAP requires that companies assess whether valuation
allowances should be established against their deferred tax
assets based on consideration of all available evidence, both
positive and negative, using a more likely than not
standard. This assessment considers, among other matters, the
nature, frequency and amount of recent losses, the duration of
statutory carryforward periods, and tax planning strategies. In
making such judgments, significant weight is given to evidence
that can be objectively verified.
Valuation allowances have been established for deferred tax
assets based on a more likely than not threshold.
The ability to realize deferred tax assets depends on our
ability to generate sufficient taxable income within the
carryforward periods provided for in the tax law for each tax
jurisdiction. We have considered the following possible sources
of taxable income when assessing the realization of our deferred
tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences;
|
|
|
|
Taxable income or loss, based on recent results, exclusive of
reversing temporary differences and carryforwards; and
|
|
|
|
Tax-planning strategies.
|
We reported income tax expense of $14 million in the first
quarter of 2011. The tax expense recorded differs from the
expense that would be recorded using a U.S. Federal
statutory rate of 35 percent due to a net tax benefit of
$10 million primarily related to U.S. taxable income
with no associated tax expense due to our net operating loss
(NOL) position and income generated in lower tax
rate jurisdictions, partially offset by the impact of recording
a valuation allowance against the tax benefit for losses in
certain foreign jurisdictions. In evaluating the requirements to
record a valuation allowance, accounting standards do not permit
us to consider an economic recovery in the U.S. or new
business we have won. Consequently, beginning in 2008, given our
historical losses, we concluded that our ability to fully
utilize our NOLs was limited due to projecting the continuation
of the negative economic environment and the impact of the
negative operating environment on our tax planning strategies.
As a result of our tax planning strategies which have not yet
been implemented and which do not depend upon generating future
taxable income, we carry deferred tax assets in the U.S. of
$90 million relating to the expected utilization of those
NOLs. The federal NOLs expire beginning in tax years ending in
2020 through 2029. The state NOLs expire in various tax years
through 2029.
If our operating performance improves on a sustained basis, our
conclusion regarding the need for a valuation allowance could
change, resulting in the reversal of some or all of the
valuation allowance in the future. The charge to establish the
U.S. valuation allowance also includes items related to the
losses allocable to certain state jurisdictions where it was
determined that tax attributes related to those jurisdictions
were potentially not realizable.
42
We are required to record a valuation allowance against deferred
tax assets generated by taxable losses in each period in the
U.S. as well as in other foreign jurisdictions. Our future
provision for income taxes will include no tax benefit with
respect to losses incurred and no tax expense with respect to
income generated in these jurisdictions until the respective
valuation allowance is eliminated. This will cause variability
in our effective tax rate.
Goodwill,
net
We evaluate goodwill for impairment in the fourth quarter of
each year, or more frequently if events indicate it is
warranted. The goodwill impairment test consists of a two-step
process. In step one, we compare the estimated fair value of our
reporting units with goodwill to the carrying value of the
units assets and liabilities to determine if impairment
exists within the recorded balance of goodwill. We estimate the
fair value of each reporting unit using the income approach
which is based on the present value of estimated future cash
flows. The income approach is dependent on a number of factors,
including estimates of market trends, forecasted revenues and
expenses, capital expenditures, weighted average cost of capital
and other variables. A separate discount rate derived by a
combination of published sources, internal estimates and
weighted based on our debt and equity structure, was used to
calculate the discounted cash flows for each of our reporting
units. These estimates are based on assumptions that we believe
to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and outside
of the control of management. If the carrying value of the
reporting unit is higher than its fair value, there is an
indication that impairment may exist which requires step two to
be performed to measure the amount of the impairment loss. The
amount of impairment is determined by comparing the implied fair
value of a reporting units goodwill to its carrying value.
In the fourth quarter of 2010, the estimated fair value of all
of our reporting units, except for our Australian reporting
unit, significantly exceeded the carrying value of its assets
and liabilities. Our Australian reporting unit had a goodwill
balance of $11 million with an estimated fair value in
excess of its net carrying value of one percent as of the
testing date. Although our Australian operations support the
value of goodwill reported as tested in the fourth quarter of
2010, in view of the continued decline in industry production
volumes, it is possible that assumptions and estimates could
change in future periods and result in a future impairment of
our Australian reporting unit.
Pension
and Other Postretirement Benefits
We have various defined benefit pension plans that cover some of
our employees. We also have postretirement health care and life
insurance plans that cover some of our domestic employees. Our
pension and postretirement health care and life insurance
expenses and valuations are dependent on assumptions used by our
actuaries in calculating those amounts. These assumptions
include discount rates, health care cost trend rates, long-term
return on plan assets, retirement rates, mortality rates and
other factors. Health care cost trend rate assumptions are
developed based on historical cost data and an assessment of
likely long-term trends. Retirement rates are based primarily on
actual plan experience while mortality rates are based upon the
general population experience which is not expected to differ
materially from our experience.
Our approach to establishing the discount rate assumption for
both our domestic and foreign plans is generally based on the
yield on high-quality corporate fixed-income investments. At the
end of each year, the discount rate is determined using the
results of bond yield curve models based on a portfolio of high
quality bonds matching the notional cash inflows with the
expected benefit payments for each significant benefit plan.
Based on this approach, for 2011 we lowered the weighted average
discount rate for all our pension plans to 5.5 percent in
2011 from 6.0 percent in 2010. The discount rate for
postretirement benefits was lowered to 5.6 percent in 2011
from 6.1 percent in 2010.
Our approach to determining expected return on plan asset
assumptions evaluates both historical returns as well as
estimates of future returns, and is adjusted for any expected
changes in the long-term outlook for the equity and fixed income
markets. As a result, our estimate of the weighted average
long-term rate of return on plan assets for all of our pension
plans was lowered from 7.6 percent in 2010 to
7.2 percent for 2011.
Except in the U.K., our pension plans generally do not require
employee contributions. Our policy is to fund our pension plans
in accordance with applicable U.S. and foreign government
regulations and to make additional
43
payments as funds are available to achieve full funding of the
accumulated benefit obligation. At March 31, 2011, all
legal funding requirements had been met.
Changes
in Accounting Pronouncements
There were no recent accounting pronouncements that were issued
or became effective during the first quarter of 2011 which
affect our financial statements and footnote disclosures.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Capitalization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt and maturities classified as current
|
|
$
|
146
|
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
|
132
|
%
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,185
|
|
|
|
1,160
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
1,331
|
|
|
|
1,223
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total redeemable noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenneco Inc. shareholders equity
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
1,464
|
|
|
$
|
1,270
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General. Short-term debt, which includes
maturities classified as current, borrowings by foreign
subsidiaries, and borrowings securitized by our North American
accounts receivable securitization program, was
$146 million and $63 million as of March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010, respectively. Borrowings under our
revolving credit facilities, which are classified as long-term
debt, were $47 million and zero at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively.
The
2011 year-to-date
increase in total equity primarily resulted from net income
attributable to Tenneco Inc. of $47 million, a
$31 million increase caused by the impact of changes in
foreign exchange rates on the translation of financial
statements of our foreign subsidiaries into U.S. dollars, a
$1 million increase in premium on common stock and other
capital surplus relating to common stock issued pursuant to
benefit plans, and a $1 million increase in additional
liability for pension and postretirement benefits.
Overview. Our financing arrangements are
primarily provided by a committed senior secured financing
arrangement with a syndicate of banks and other financial
institutions. The arrangement is secured by substantially all
our domestic assets and pledges of up to 66 percent of the
stock of certain first-tier foreign subsidiaries, as well as
guarantees by our material domestic subsidiaries.
On June 3, 2010, we completed an amendment and extension of
our senior secured credit facility by extending the term of our
revolving credit facility and replacing our $128 million
term loan A with a larger and longer maturity term loan B
facility. As a result of the amendment and extension, as of
March 31, 2011, the senior credit facility provides us with
a total revolving credit facility size of $622 million
until March 16, 2012, when commitments of $66 million
will expire. After March 16, 2012, the extended revolving
credit facility will provide $556 million of revolving
credit and will mature on May 31, 2014. The extended
facility will mature earlier on December 15, 2013, if our
$130 million
tranche B-1
letter of credit/revolving loan facility is not refinanced by
that date. Prior to maturity, funds may be borrowed, repaid and
re-borrowed under the two revolving credit facilities without
premium or penalty. The leverage ratio (consolidated
indebtedness net of cash divided by consolidated EBITDA as
defined in the senior credit facility agreement) was decreased
from 5.00 to 4.50 for the second quarter of 2010; from 4.75 to
4.25 for the third quarter of 2010; and from 4.50 to 4.25 for
the fourth quarter of 2010 as a result of the June 3, 2010
amendment.
As of March 31, 2011, the senior credit facility also
provides a six-year, $150 million term loan B maturing in
June 2016, and a seven-year $130 million
tranche B-1
letter of credit/revolving loan facility maturing in March 2014.
44
We are required to make quarterly principal payments of $375
thousand on the term loan B, beginning on September 20,
2010 through March 31, 2016 with a final payment of
$141 million due June 3, 2016. The
tranche B-1
letter of credit/revolving loan facility requires repayment by
March 2014. We can enter into revolving loans and issue letters
of credit under the $130 million
tranche B-1
letter of credit/revolving loan facility. The
tranche B-1
letter of credit/revolving loan facility is reflected as debt on
our balance sheet only if we borrow money under this facility or
if we use the facility to make payments for letters of credit.
There is no additional cost to us for issuing letters of credit
under the
tranche B-1
letter of credit/revolving loan facility. However, outstanding
letters of credit reduce our availability to enter into
revolving loans under the facility. We pay the
tranche B-1
lenders interest equal to LIBOR plus a margin on all borrowings
under the facility. Funds deposited with the administrative
agent by the lenders and not borrowed by the Company earn
interest at an annual rate approximately equal to LIBOR less
25 basis points.
Beginning June 3, 2010, our term loan B and revolving
credit facility bear interest at an annual rate equal to, at our
option, either (i) the London Interbank Offered Rate plus a
margin of 475 and 450 basis points, respectively, or
(ii) a rate consisting of the greater of (a) the
JPMorgan Chase prime rate plus a margin of 375 and
350 basis points, respectively, (b) the Federal Funds
rate plus 50 basis points plus a margin of 375 and
350 basis points, respectively, and (c) the Eurodollar
Rate plus 100 basis points plus a margin of 375 and
350 basis points, respectively. The margin we pay on these
borrowings will be reduced by 25 basis points following
each fiscal quarter for which our consolidated net leverage
ratio is less than 2.25 for extending lenders and for the term
loan B and will be further reduced by an additional
25 basis points following each fiscal quarter for which the
consolidated net leverage ratio is less than 2.0 for extending
lenders. The margin we pay on these borrowings for extending
lenders will increase by 50 basis points following each
fiscal quarter for which our consolidated net leverage ratio is
greater than or equal to 4.00 and will be further increased by
an additional 50 basis points following each fiscal quarter
for which the consolidated net leverage ratio is greater than or
equal to 5.00. Our consolidated net leverage ratio was 2.32 and
2.24 as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively. As a result, the margin we pay on these borrowings
was reduced in February 2011 by 25 basis points for
extending lenders. However, since the ratio increased during the
quarter, the margin we pay on borrowings will increase by
25 basis points beginning in May 2011 and will remain at
such level for so long as our consolidated net leverage ratio
remains above 2.25 and less than 4.00.
The borrowings under our
tranche B-1
letter of credit/revolving loan facility incur interest at an
annual rate equal to, at our option, either (i) the London
Interbank Offered Rate plus a margin of 500 basis points,
or (ii) a rate consisting of the greater of (a) the
JPMorgan Chase prime rate plus a margin of 400 basis
points, (b) the Federal Funds rate plus 50 basis
points plus a margin of 400 basis points, and (c) the
Eurodollar Rate plus 100 basis points plus a margin of
400 basis points. The rate will increase by 50 basis
points following each fiscal quarter for which our consolidated
net leverage ratio is greater than or equal to 5.00.
At March 31, 2011, of the $752 million available under
the two revolving credit facilities within our senior secured
credit facility, we had unused borrowing capacity of
$652 million with $47 million in outstanding
borrowings and $53 million in letters of credit
outstanding. As of March 31, 2011, our outstanding debt
also included $250 million of
81/8 percent
senior notes due November 15, 2015, $149 million term
loan B due June 3, 2016, $225 million of
73/4 percent
senior notes due August 15, 2018, $500 million of
67/8 percent
senior notes due December 15, 2020, and $160 million
of other debt.
On December 9, 2010, we commenced a cash tender offer of
our outstanding $500 million
85/8
percent senior subordinated notes due in 2014 and a consent
solicitation to amend the indenture governing these notes. The
consent solicitation expired on December 22, 2010 and the
cash tender offer expired on January 6, 2011. On
December 23, 2010, we issued $500 million of
67/8 percent
senior notes due December 15, 2020 in a private offering.
The net proceeds of this transaction, together with cash and
available liquidity, were used to finance the purchase of our
85/8 percent
senior subordinated notes pursuant to the tender offer at a
price of 103.25 percent of the principal amount, plus
accrued and unpaid interest for holders who tendered prior to
the expiration of the consent solicitation, and
100.25 percent of the principal amount, plus accrued and
unpaid interest, for other participants. On January 7,
2011, we redeemed all remaining outstanding $20 million of
senior subordinated notes that were not previously tendered, at
a price of 102.875 percent of the principal amount, plus
accrued and unpaid interest. To facilitate these transactions,
we amended our senior credit agreement to permit us to refinance
our senior subordinated notes with new senior unsecured notes.
We did not incur any fee in connection with this amendment. The
new notes are general senior obligations of Tenneco Inc. and are
not secured by assets of Tenneco Inc. or any of our subsidiaries
that
45
guarantee the new notes. We recorded $20 million of pre-tax
charges in December 2010 and an additional $1 million of
pre-tax charges in the first quarter of 2011 related to our
repurchase and redemption of our
85/8 percent
senior subordinated notes. On March 14, 2011, we completed
an offer to exchange the $500 million of
67/8 percent
senior notes due in 2020 which have been registered under the
Securities Act of 1933, for and in replacement of all
outstanding unregistered
67/8 percent
senior notes due in 2020. We received tenders from holders of
all $500 million of the aggregate outstanding amount of the
original notes. The terms of the new notes are substantially
identical to the terms of the original notes for which they were
exchanged, except that the transfer restrictions and the
registration rights applicable to the original notes generally
do not apply to the new notes.
On August 3, 2010, we issued $225 million of
73/4 percent
senior notes due August 15, 2018 in a private offering. The
net proceeds of this transaction, together with cash and
available liquidity, were used to finance the redemption of our
101/4 percent
senior secured notes due in 2013. We called the senior secured
notes for redemption on August 3, 2010, and completed the
redemption on September 2, 2010 at a price of
101.708 percent of the principal amount, plus accrued and
unpaid interest. We recorded $5 million of expense related
to our redemption of our
101/4
percent senior secured notes in the third quarter of 2010. The
new notes are general senior obligations of Tenneco Inc. and are
not secured by assets of Tenneco Inc. or any of our subsidiaries
that guarantee the new notes. On February 14, 2011, we
completed an offer to exchange the $225 million of
73/4 percent
senior notes due in 2018 which have been registered under the
Securities Act of 1933, for and in replacement of all
outstanding unregistered
73/4 percent
senior notes due in 2018. We received tenders from holders of
all $225 million of the aggregate outstanding amount of the
original notes. The terms of the new notes are substantially
identical to the terms of the original notes for which they were
exchanged, except that the transfer restrictions and the
registration rights applicable to the original notes generally
do not apply to the new notes.
Senior Credit Facility Interest Rates and
Fees. Borrowings and letters of credit issued
under the senior credit facility bear interest at an annual rate
equal to, at our option, either (i) the London Interbank
Offered Rate plus a margin as set forth in the table below; or
(ii) a rate consisting of the greater of the JPMorgan Chase
prime rate, the Federal Funds rate plus 50 basis points or
the Eurodollar Rate plus 100 basis points, plus a margin as
set forth in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/14/2009
|
|
3/1/2010
|
|
6/3/2010
|
|
|
|
|
thru
|
|
thru
|
|
thru
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
2/28/2010
|
|
6/2/2010
|
|
2/27/2011
|
|
2/28/2011
|
|
Applicable Margin over LIBOR for Revolving Loans
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
|
|
4.25
|
%*
|
Applicable Margin over LIBOR for Term Loan B Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.75
|
%
|
|
|
4.50
|
%*
|
Applicable Margin over LIBOR for Term Loan A Loans
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applicable Margin over LIBOR for
Tranche B-1
Loans
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
Applicable Margin over Prime-based Loans
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applicable Margin over Prime for Revolving Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
|
|
3.25
|
%*
|
Applicable Margin over Prime for Term Loan B Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.75
|
%
|
|
|
3.50
|
%*
|
Applicable Margin over Prime for
Tranche B-1
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
Applicable Margin over Federal Funds for Revolving Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
|
|
3.25
|
%*
|
Applicable Margin over Federal Funds for Term Loan B Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.75
|
%
|
|
|
3.50
|
%*
|
Applicable Margin over Federal Funds for
Tranche B-1
Loans
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
Commitment Fee
|
|
|
0.75
|
%
|
|
|
0.50
|
%
|
|
|
0.75
|
%
|
|
|
0.50
|
%*
|
|
|
|
* |
|
In May 2011, the margin we pay on borrowings will increase by
25 basis points, as a result of an increase in our
consolidated net leverage ratio from 2.24 at December 31,
2010 to 2.32 at March 31, 2011. |
Senior Credit Facility Other Terms and
Conditions. Our senior credit facility requires
that we maintain financial ratios equal to or better than the
following consolidated net leverage ratio (consolidated
indebtedness net of cash divided by consolidated EBITDA, as
defined in the senior credit facility agreement), and
consolidated interest coverage ratio (consolidated EBITDA
divided by consolidated interest expense, as defined under the
senior credit facility agreement) at the end of each period
indicated. Failure to maintain these ratios will result in a
default
46
under our senior credit facility. The financial ratios required
under the amended and restated senior credit facility and, the
actual ratios we achieved for the first quarter of 2011, are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
Req.
|
|
Act.
|
|
Leverage Ratio (maximum)
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
2.32
|
|
Interest Coverage Ratio (minimum)
|
|
|
2.55
|
|
|
|
4.37
|
|
The financial ratios required under the senior credit facility
for the remainder of 2011 and beyond are set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Leverage
|
|
Coverage
|
Period Ending
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Ratio
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
3.75
|
|
|
|
2.55
|
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
2.55
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
2.55
|
|
Each quarter thereafter
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
2.75
|
|
The covenants in our senior credit facility agreement generally
prohibit us from repaying or refinancing our senior notes. So
long as no default existed, we would, however, under our senior
credit facility agreement, be permitted to repay or refinance
our senior notes: (i) with the net cash proceeds of
incremental facilities and permitted refinancing indebtedness
(as defined in the senior credit facility agreement);
(ii) with the net cash proceeds from the sale of shares of
our common stock; (iii) in exchange for permitted
refinancing indebtedness or in exchange for shares of our common
stock; (iv) with the net cash proceeds of any new senior or
subordinated unsecured indebtedness; (v) with the proceeds
of revolving credit loans (as defined in the senior credit
facility agreement); (vi) with the cash generated by the
operations of the company; and (vii) in an amount equal to
the sum of (a) the net cash proceeds of qualified stock
issued by the Company after March 16, 2007, plus
(b) the portion of annual excess cash flow (beginning with
excess cash flow for fiscal year 2010) not required to be
applied to payment of the credit facilities and which is not
used for other purposes, provided that the aggregate principal
amount of senior notes purchased and cancelled or redeemed
pursuant to clauses (v), (vi) and (vii), is capped as
follows based on the pro forma consolidated leverage ratio after
giving effect to such purchase, cancellation or redemption:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Senior
|
|
|
|
Note Maximum
|
|
Proforma Consolidated Leverage Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
Greater than or equal to 3.0x
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
Greater than or equal to 2.5x
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
Less than 2.5x
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
Although the senior credit facility agreement would permit us to
repay or refinance our senior notes under the conditions
described above, any repayment or refinancing of our outstanding
notes would be subject to market conditions and either the
voluntary participation of note holders or our ability to redeem
the notes under the terms of the applicable note indenture. For
example, while the senior credit agreement would allow us to
repay our outstanding notes via a direct exchange of the notes
for either permitted refinancing indebtedness or for shares of
our common stock, we do not, under the terms of the agreements
governing our outstanding notes, have the right to refinance the
notes via any type of direct exchange.
The senior credit facility agreement also contains other
restrictions on our operations that are customary for similar
facilities, including limitations on: (i) incurring
additional liens; (ii) sale and leaseback transactions
(except for the permitted transactions as described in the
senior credit facility agreement); (iii) liquidations and
dissolutions; (iv) incurring additional indebtedness or
guarantees; (v) investments and acquisitions;
(vi) dividends and share repurchases; (vii) mergers
and consolidations; and (viii) refinancing of the senior
notes. Compliance with these requirements and restrictions is a
condition for any incremental borrowings under the senior credit
facility agreement and failure to meet these requirements
enables the lenders to require repayment of any outstanding
loans.
47
As of March 31, 2011, we were in compliance with all the
financial covenants and operational restrictions of the
facility. Our senior credit facility does not contain any terms
that could accelerate payment of the facility or affect pricing
under the facility as a result of a credit rating agency
downgrade.
Senior Notes. As of March 31, 2011, our
outstanding debt also includes $250 million of
81/8
percent senior notes due November 15, 2015, $225 million of
73/4 percent
senior notes due August 15, 2018 and $500 million of
67/8 percent
senior notes due December 15, 2020. Under the indentures
governing the notes, we are permitted to redeem some or all of
the remaining senior notes at any time after November 15,
2011 in the case of the senior notes due 2015, August 14,
2014 in the case of the senior notes due 2018, and
December 15, 2015 in the case of senior notes due 2020. On
January 7, 2011, we redeemed all remaining outstanding
$20 million of senior subordinated notes at a price of
102.875 percent of principal amount plus accrued and unpaid
interest. If we sell certain of our assets or experience
specified kinds of changes in control, we must offer to
repurchase the notes. Under the indentures governing the notes,
we are permitted to redeem up to 35 percent of the senior
notes due 2018, with the proceeds of certain equity offerings
completed before August 13, 2013 and up to 35 percent
of the senior notes due 2020, with the proceeds of certain
equity offerings completed before December 15, 2013.
Our senior notes require that, as a condition precedent to
incurring certain types of indebtedness not otherwise permitted,
our consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio, as calculated on a
pro forma basis, be greater than 2.00. The indentures also
contain restrictions on our operations, including limitations
on: (i) incurring additional indebtedness or liens;
(ii) dividends; (iii) distributions and stock
repurchases; (iv) investments; (v) asset sales and
(vi) mergers and consolidations. Subject to limited
exceptions, all of our existing and future material domestic
wholly owned subsidiaries fully and unconditionally guarantee
these notes on a joint and several basis. There are no
significant restrictions on the ability of the subsidiaries that
have guaranteed these notes to make distributions to us. As of
March 31, 2011, we were in compliance with the covenants
and restrictions of these indentures.
Accounts Receivable Securitization. We
securitize some of our accounts receivable on a limited recourse
basis in North America and Europe. As servicer under these
accounts receivable securitization programs, we are responsible
for performing all accounts receivable administration functions
for these securitized financial assets including collections and
processing of customer invoice adjustments. In North America, we
have an accounts receivable securitization program with three
commercial banks. We securitize original equipment and
aftermarket receivables on a daily basis under the bank program.
In March 2011, the North American program was amended and
extended to March 23, 2012. The first priority facility
continues to provide financing of up to $110 million and
the second priority facility, which is subordinated to the first
priority facility, continues to provide up to an additional
$40 million of financing. Both facilities monetize accounts
receivable generated in the U.S. and Canada that meet
certain eligibility requirements, and the second priority
facility also monetizes certain accounts receivable generated in
the U.S. or Canada that would otherwise be ineligible under
the first priority securitization facility. The amendments to
the North American program expand the trade receivables that are
eligible for purchase under the program and decrease the margin
we pay to our banks. The amount of outstanding third party
investments in our securitized accounts receivable under the
North American program was $82 million at March 31,
2011 and zero at December 31, 2010.
Each facility contains customary covenants for financings of
this type, including restrictions related to liens, payments,
mergers or consolidation and amendments to the agreements
underlying the receivables pool. Further, each facility may be
terminated upon the occurrence of customary events (with
customary grace periods, if applicable), including breaches of
covenants, failure to maintain certain financial ratios,
inaccuracies of representations and warranties, bankruptcy and
insolvency events, certain changes in the rate of default or
delinquency of the receivables, a change of control and the
entry or other enforcement of material judgments. In addition,
each facility contains cross-default provisions, where the
facility could be terminated in the event of non-payment of
other material indebtedness when due and any other event which
permits the acceleration of the maturity of material
indebtedness.
We also securitize receivables in our European operations with
regional banks in Europe. The arrangements to securitize
receivables in Europe are provided under seven separate
facilities provided by various financial institutions in each of
the foreign jurisdictions. The commitments for these
arrangements are generally for one year, but some may be
cancelled with notice 90 days prior to renewal. In some
instances, the arrangement provides
48
for cancellation by the applicable financial institution at any
time upon 15 days, or less, notification. The amount of
outstanding third party investments in our securitized accounts
receivable in Europe was $147 million and $91 million
at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
If we were not able to securitize receivables under either the
North American or European securitization programs, our
borrowings under our revolving credit agreements might increase.
These accounts receivable securitization programs provide us
with access to cash at costs that are generally favorable to
alternative sources of financing, and allow us to reduce
borrowings under our revolving credit agreements.
In our North American accounts receivable securitization
programs, we transfer a partial interest in a pool of
receivables and the interest that we retain is subordinate to
the transferred interest. Accordingly, we account for our North
American securitization program as a secured borrowing. In our
European programs, we transfer accounts receivables in their
entirety to the acquiring entities and satisfy all of the
conditions established under ASC Topic 860,
Transfers and Servicing, to report the transfer of
financial assets in their entirety as a sale. The fair value of
assets received as proceeds in exchange for the transfer of
accounts receivable under our European securitization programs
approximates the fair value of such receivables. We recognized
$1 million in interest expense in both the three month
period ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively,
relating to our North American securitization program. In
addition, we recognized a loss of $1 million in both the
three month period ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively, on the sale of trade accounts receivable in our
European accounts receivable securitization programs,
representing the discount from book values at which these
receivables were sold to our banks. The discount rate varies
based on funding costs incurred by our banks, which averaged
approximately 3 percent during the first quarter of 2011.
Capital Requirements. We believe that cash
flows from operations, combined with our cash on hand and
available borrowing capacity described above, assuming that we
maintain compliance with the financial covenants and other
requirements of our loan agreement, will be sufficient to meet
our future capital requirements, including debt amortization,
capital expenditures, pension contributions, and other
operational requirements, for the following year. Our ability to
meet the financial covenants depends upon a number of
operational and economic factors, many of which are beyond our
control. In the event that we are unable to meet these financial
covenants, we would consider several options to meet our cash
flow needs. Such actions include additional restructuring
initiatives and other cost reductions, sales of assets,
reductions to working capital and capital spending, issuance of
equity and other alternatives to enhance our financial and
operating position. Should we be required to implement any of
these actions to meet our cash flow needs, we believe we can do
so in a reasonable time frame.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
Foreign
Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We use derivative financial instruments, principally foreign
currency forward purchase and sale contracts with terms of less
than one year, to hedge our exposure to changes in foreign
currency exchange rates. Our primary exposure to changes in
foreign currency rates results from intercompany loans made
between affiliates to minimize the need for borrowings from
third parties. Additionally, we enter into foreign currency
forward purchase and sale contracts to mitigate our exposure to
changes in exchange rates on certain intercompany and
third-party trade receivables and payables. We manage
counter-party credit risk by entering into derivative financial
instruments with major financial institutions that can be
expected to fully perform under the terms of such agreements. We
do not enter into derivative financial instruments for
speculative purposes.
In managing our foreign currency exposures, we identify and
aggregate existing offsetting positions and then hedge residual
exposures through third-party derivative contracts. The fair
value of our foreign currency forward contracts was
$1 million at March 31, 2011 and is based on an
internally developed model which incorporates observable inputs
including quoted spot rates, forward exchange rates and
discounted future expected cash flows utilizing market interest
rates with similar quality and maturity characteristics. The
following table summarizes by
49
major currency the notional amounts for our foreign currency
forward purchase and sale contracts as of March 31, 2011.
All contracts in the following table mature in 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Amount
|
|
|
|
|
in Foreign Currency
|
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
Australian dollars
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
Sell
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
British pounds
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
Sell
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
European euro
|
|
Sell
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Czech Republic koruna
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
122
|
|
Japanese yen
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
585
|
|
South African rand
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
208
|
|
U.S. dollars
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
Sell
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
Other
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
Sell
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Interest
Rate Risk
Our financial instruments that are sensitive to market risk for
changes in interest rates are primarily our debt securities. We
use our revolving credit facilities to finance our short-term
and long-term capital requirements. We pay a current market rate
of interest on these borrowings. Our long-term capital
requirements have been financed with long-term debt with
original maturity dates ranging from four to ten years. On
March 31, 2011, we had $990 million in long-term debt
obligations that have fixed interest rates. Of that amount,
$500 million is fixed through December 2020,
$250 million is fixed through November 2015,
$225 million is fixed through August 2018 and the remainder
is fixed from 2012 through 2025. We also have $198 million
in long-term debt obligations that are subject to variable
interest rates. For more detailed explanations on our debt
structure and senior credit facility refer to Liquidity
and Capital Resources Capitalization earlier
in this Managements Discussion and Analysis.
We estimate that the fair value of our long-term debt at
March 31, 2011 was about 104 percent of its book
value. A one percentage point increase or decrease in interest
rates would increase or decrease the annual interest expense we
recognize in the income statement and the cash we pay for
interest expense by about $3 million.
Environmental
and Other Matters
We are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution
control laws and regulations in all jurisdictions in which we
operate. We expense or capitalize, as appropriate, expenditures
for ongoing compliance with environmental regulations that
relate to current operations. We expense costs related to an
existing condition caused by past operations that do not
contribute to current or future revenue generation. We record
liabilities when environmental assessments indicate that
required remedial efforts are probable and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Estimates of the liability are based upon
currently available facts, existing technology, and presently
enacted laws and regulations taking into consideration the
likely effects of inflation and other societal and economic
factors. We consider all available evidence including prior
experience in remediation of contaminated sites, other
companies cleanup experiences and data released by the
United States Environmental Protection Agency or other
organizations. These estimated liabilities are subject to
revision in future periods based on actual costs or new
information. Where future cash flows are fixed or reliably
determinable, we have discounted the liabilities. All other
environmental liabilities are recorded at their undiscounted
amounts. We evaluate recoveries separately from the liability
and, when they are assured, recoveries are recorded and reported
separately from the associated liability in our condensed
consolidated financial statements.
50
As of March 31, 2011, we have the obligation to remediate
or contribute towards the remediation of certain sites,
including two existing Federal Superfund sites. At
March 31, 2011, our aggregated estimated share of
environmental remediation costs for all these sites on a
discounted basis was approximately $16 million, of which
$5 million is recorded in other current liabilities and
$11 million is recorded in deferred credits and other
liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheet. For
those locations in which the liability was discounted, the
weighted average discount rate used was 2.6 percent. The
undiscounted value of the estimated remediation costs was
$21 million. Our expected payments of environmental
remediation costs are estimated to be approximately
$5 million in 2011, $1 million each year beginning
2012 through 2015 and $12 million thereafter. Based on
information known to us, we have established reserves that we
believe are adequate for these costs. Although we believe these
estimates of remediation costs are reasonable and are based on
the latest available information, the costs are estimates and
are subject to revision as more information becomes available
about the extent of remediation required. At some sites, we
expect that other parties will contribute towards the
remediation costs. In addition, certain environmental statutes
provide that our liability could be joint and several, meaning
that we could be required to pay in excess of our share of
remediation costs. Our understanding of the financial strength
of other potentially responsible parties at these sites has been
considered, where appropriate, in our determination of our
estimated liability.
We do not believe that any potential costs associated with our
current status as a potentially responsible party in the Federal
Superfund sites, or as a liable party at the other locations
referenced herein, will be material to our condensed
consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash
flows.
We also from time to time are involved in legal proceedings,
claims or investigations that are incidental to the conduct of
our business. Some of these proceedings allege damages against
us relating to environmental liabilities (including toxic tort,
property damage and remediation), intellectual property matters
(including patent, trademark and copyright infringement, and
licensing disputes), personal injury claims (including injuries
due to product failure, design or warning issues, and other
product liability related matters), taxes, employment matters,
and commercial or contractual disputes, sometimes related to
acquisitions or divestitures. For example, one of our Argentine
subsidiaries is currently defending against a criminal complaint
alleging the failure to comply with laws requiring the proceeds
of export transactions to be collected, reported
and/or
converted to local currency within specified time periods. As
another example, we are subject to an audit in 11 states of
our practices with respect to the payment of unclaimed property
to those states, which could cover over 30 years. We now
have practices in place which we believe ensure that we pay
unclaimed property as required. We vigorously defend ourselves
against all of these claims. In future periods, we could be
subject to cash costs or charges to earnings if any of these
matters are resolved on unfavorable terms. However, although the
ultimate outcome of any legal matter cannot be predicted with
certainty, based on current information, including our
assessment of the merits of the particular claim, we do not
expect that these legal proceedings or claims will have any
material adverse impact on our future consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
In addition, we are subject to a number of lawsuits initiated by
a significant number of claimants alleging health problems as a
result of exposure to asbestos. In the early 2000s we were
named in nearly 20,000 complaints, most of which were filed in
Mississippi state court and the vast majority of which made no
allegations of exposure to asbestos from our product categories.
Most of these claims have been dismissed and our current docket
of active and inactive cases is less than 500 cases nationwide.
A small number of claims have been asserted by railroad workers
alleging exposure to asbestos products in railroad cars
manufactured by The Pullman Company, one of our subsidiaries.
The balance of the claims is related to alleged exposure to
asbestos in our automotive emission control products. Only a
small percentage of the claimants allege that they were
automobile mechanics and a significant number appear to involve
workers in other industries or otherwise do not include
sufficient information to determine whether there is any basis
for a claim against us. We believe, based on scientific and
other evidence, it is unlikely that mechanics were exposed to
asbestos by our former muffler products and that, in any event,
they would not be at increased risk of asbestos-related disease
based on their work with these products. Further, many of these
cases involve numerous defendants, with the number of each in
some cases exceeding 100 defendants from a variety of
industries. Additionally, the plaintiffs either do not specify
any, or specify the jurisdictional minimum, dollar amount for
damages. As major asbestos manufacturers continue to go out of
business or file for bankruptcy, we may experience an increased
number of these claims. We vigorously defend ourselves against
these claims as part of our
51
ordinary course of business. In future periods, we could be
subject to charges to earnings if any of these matters are
resolved unfavorably to us. To date, with respect to claims that
have proceeded sufficiently through the judicial process, we
have regularly achieved favorable resolutions. Accordingly, we
presently believe that these asbestos-related claims will not
have a material adverse impact on our future consolidated
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Employee
Stock Ownership Plans
We have established Employee Stock Ownership Plans for the
benefit of U.S. employees. Under the plans, subject to
limitations in the Internal Revenue Code, participants may elect
to defer up to 75 percent of their salary through
contributions to the plan, which are invested in selected mutual
funds or used to buy our common stock. We match in cash
50 percent of each employees contribution up to eight
percent of the employees salary. In connection with
freezing the defined benefit pension plans for nearly all
U.S. based salaried and non-union hourly employees
effective December 31, 2006, and the related replacement of
those defined benefit plans with defined contribution plans, we
are making additional contributions to the Employee Stock
Ownership Plans. We recorded expense for these contributions of
approximately $4 million and $3 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Matching contributions vest immediately. Defined benefit
replacement contributions fully vest on the employees
third anniversary of employment.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
For information regarding our exposure to interest rate risk and
foreign currency exchange rate risk, see the caption entitled
Derivative Financial Instruments in
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(e)
and
Rule 15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of
the quarter covered by this report. Based on their evaluation,
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have
concluded that the companys disclosure controls and
procedures are effective to ensure that information required to
be disclosed by our company in reports that it files or submits
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in Securities and
Exchange Commission rules and forms and such information is
accumulated and communicated to management as appropriate to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31,
2011, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
52
PART II
We are exposed to certain risks and uncertainties that could
have a material adverse impact on our business, financial
condition and operating results. There have been no material
changes to the Risk Factors described in Part I,
Item 1A of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010.
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
UNREGISTERED
SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
|
(a) None.
(b) Not applicable.
(c) Purchase of equity securities by the issuer and
affiliated purchasers. The following table
provides information relating to our purchase of shares of our
common stock in the first quarter of 2011. All of these
purchases reflect shares withheld upon vesting of restricted
stock, to satisfy statutory minimum tax withholding obligations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Period
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
January 2011
|
|
|
71,731
|
|
|
$
|
43.59
|
|
February 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 2011
|
|
|
1,267
|
|
|
$
|
40.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
72,998
|
|
|
$
|
43.53
|
|
We presently have no publicly announced repurchase plan or
program, but intend to continue to satisfy statutory minimum tax
withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of
outstanding restricted stock through the withholding of shares.
53
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, Tenneco Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
TENNECO INC.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Kenneth
R. Trammell
|
Kenneth R. Trammell
Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
Dated: May 10, 2011
54
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
TO
QUARTERLY REPORT ON
FORM 10-Q
FOR QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Third Amended and Restated Receivables
Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 25, 2011, among
Tenneco Automotive RSA Company, as Seller, Tenneco Automotive
Operating Company Inc., as Servicer, Falcon Asset Securitization
Company LLC and Liberty Street Funding LLC, as Conduits, the
Committed Purchasers from time to time party thereto, JPMorgan
Chase Bank, N.A., The Bank of Nova Scotia and Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., as Co-Agents and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as
Administrative Agent (incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit 10.1 of the registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated as of March 29, 2011, File
No. 1-12387).
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to SLOT Receivables Purchase Agreement,
dated as of March 25, 2011, among Tenneco Automotive RSA
Company, as Seller, Tenneco Automotive Operating Company Inc. as
Servicer, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., individually and as SLOT
Agent (incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.2
of the registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated as of March 29, 2011, File
No. 1-12387).
|
|
*10
|
.3
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Tenneco Inc. Change in Control Severance
Benefit Plan for Key Executives, as Amended and Restated
effective December 12, 2007
|
|
*12
|
|
|
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
|
|
*15
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Letter of PricewaterhouseCoopers regarding interim financial
information.
|
|
*31
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of Gregg M. Sherrill under Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
*31
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Certification of Kenneth R. Trammell under Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
*32
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of Gregg M. Sherrill and Kenneth R. Trammell under
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
*101
|
.INS
|
|
|
|
XBRL Instance Document.
|
|
*101
|
.SCH
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
|
|
*101
|
.CAL
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
|
|
*101
|
.DEF
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
|
|
*101
|
.LAB
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
|
|
*101
|
.PRE
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
|
55