Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
Commission file number: 000-30586
Ivanhoe Energy Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Yukon, Canada
|
|
98-0372413 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(IRS Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
654-999 Canada Place
Vancouver, BC, Canada V6C 3E1
(604) 688-8323
(Address and telephone number of the registrants principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
As at April 29, 2011, Ivanhoe Energy Inc. had 343,970,158 Common Shares outstanding with no par value.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
IVANHOE ENERGY INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
January 1, |
|
(US$000s) |
|
Notes |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
5 |
|
|
80,798 |
|
|
|
68,317 |
|
|
|
24,362 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
6,508 |
|
|
|
6,359 |
|
|
|
5,021 |
|
Note receivable |
|
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
Prepaid and other |
|
|
|
|
2,061 |
|
|
|
2,859 |
|
|
|
771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,601 |
|
|
|
77,799 |
|
|
|
30,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible |
|
6 |
|
|
284,149 |
|
|
|
273,568 |
|
|
|
207,750 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
7 |
|
|
42,731 |
|
|
|
40,618 |
|
|
|
41,983 |
|
Long term receivables |
|
|
|
|
2,584 |
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
419,065 |
|
|
|
394,418 |
|
|
|
280,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
|
24,702 |
|
|
|
21,482 |
|
|
|
10,779 |
|
Debt |
|
8 |
|
|
40,985 |
|
|
|
39,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
9, 10 |
|
|
4,211 |
|
|
|
8,447 |
|
|
|
13,023 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
530 |
|
Decommissioning costs |
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,249 |
|
|
|
69,761 |
|
|
|
25,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term debt |
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,934 |
|
Long term provisions |
|
11 |
|
|
3,031 |
|
|
|
3,008 |
|
|
|
2,187 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
21,730 |
|
|
|
21,165 |
|
|
|
22,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,010 |
|
|
|
93,934 |
|
|
|
86,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital |
|
13 |
|
|
585,664 |
|
|
|
550,562 |
|
|
|
422,322 |
|
Contributed surplus |
|
14 |
|
|
22,736 |
|
|
|
23,141 |
|
|
|
18,724 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
|
|
(284,345 |
) |
|
|
(273,219 |
) |
|
|
(246,637 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
324,055 |
|
|
|
300,484 |
|
|
|
194,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
419,065 |
|
|
|
394,418 |
|
|
|
280,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of operations and going concern |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements)
3
IVANHOE ENERGY INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Loss and Comprehensive Loss
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
(US$000s, except share and per share amounts) |
|
Note |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil |
|
|
|
|
8,119 |
|
|
|
5,330 |
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,186 |
|
|
|
5,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
18 |
|
|
4,523 |
|
|
|
3,454 |
|
Exploration and evaluation |
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
606 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
|
|
13,417 |
|
|
|
8,432 |
|
Depletion and depreciation |
|
7 |
|
|
1,831 |
|
|
|
1,537 |
|
Foreign currency exchange gain |
|
|
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
(4,187 |
) |
Derivative instruments (gain) loss |
|
9, 10 |
|
|
(1,129 |
) |
|
|
2,057 |
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,425 |
|
|
|
11,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
(10,239 |
) |
|
|
(6,554 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
(322 |
) |
|
|
(79 |
) |
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
(565 |
) |
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(887 |
) |
|
|
(251 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss and comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
(11,126 |
) |
|
|
(6,805 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted |
|
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted (000s) |
|
|
|
|
338,403 |
|
|
|
307,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements)
4
IVANHOE ENERGY INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributed |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
(US$000s, except share amounts) |
|
Note |
|
(000s) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Surplus |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
282,559 |
|
|
|
422,322 |
|
|
|
18,724 |
|
|
|
(246,637 |
) |
|
|
194,409 |
|
Net loss and comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,805 |
) |
|
|
(6,805 |
) |
Shares issued for cash, net of share issue costs |
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
122,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,322 |
|
Shares issued for services |
|
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
799 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
14 |
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
3,518 |
|
|
|
(1,887 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,631 |
|
Exercise of purchase warrants |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
333,753 |
|
|
|
548,970 |
|
|
|
18,060 |
|
|
|
(253,442 |
) |
|
|
313,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributed |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
(US$000s, except share amounts) |
|
Note |
|
(000s) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Surplus |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
334,365 |
|
|
|
550,562 |
|
|
|
23,141 |
|
|
|
(273,219 |
) |
|
|
300,484 |
|
Net loss and comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,126 |
) |
|
|
(11,126 |
) |
Exercise of stock options |
|
14 |
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
4,055 |
|
|
|
(2,181 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,874 |
|
Exercise of purchase warrants |
|
|
|
|
8,621 |
|
|
|
31,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,047 |
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
343,933 |
|
|
|
585,664 |
|
|
|
22,736 |
|
|
|
(284,345 |
) |
|
|
324,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements)
5
IVANHOE ENERGY INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
(US$000s) |
|
Note |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
(11,126 |
) |
|
|
(6,805 |
) |
Items not requiring use of cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depletion and depreciation |
|
7 |
|
|
1,831 |
|
|
|
1,537 |
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
14 |
|
|
1,776 |
|
|
|
1,223 |
|
Unrealized (gain) loss on derivative instruments |
|
9, 10 |
|
|
(1,129 |
) |
|
|
2,057 |
|
Unrealized foreign currency exchange gain |
|
|
|
|
(227 |
) |
|
|
(4,373 |
) |
Deferred income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
Exploration and evaluation expense |
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
606 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
Decommissioning costs settled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
Changes in non-cash working capital items |
|
19 |
|
|
1,796 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
|
|
(6,508 |
) |
|
|
(5,431 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible expenditures |
|
|
|
|
(10,364 |
) |
|
|
(23,082 |
) |
Property, plant and equipment expenditures |
|
|
|
|
(3,949 |
) |
|
|
(818 |
) |
Long term receivables |
|
|
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
(348 |
) |
Changes in non-cash working capital items |
|
19 |
|
|
2,475 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
|
|
(11,985 |
) |
|
|
(23,368 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares and warrants issued on private placements, net of share issue costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,321 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of options and warrants |
|
10, 14 |
|
|
29,814 |
|
|
|
1,636 |
|
Changes in non-cash working capital items |
|
19 |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
|
|
29,795 |
|
|
|
137,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange gain on cash and cash equivalents held in a foreign currency |
|
|
|
|
1,179 |
|
|
|
5,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents, for the period |
|
|
|
|
12,481 |
|
|
|
114,873 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
68,317 |
|
|
|
24,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
|
|
|
80,798 |
|
|
|
139,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements)
6
IVANHOE ENERGY INC.
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(tabular amounts in US$000s, except share and per share amounts)
1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND GOING CONCERN
Ivanhoe Energy Inc. (the Company or Ivanhoe) is a publicly listed company incorporated in
Canada, with limited liability under the legislation of the Yukon. Ivanhoes common shares are
listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) and the NASDAQ Stock Market (NASDAQ). The head
office, principal address and registered and records office of the Company are located at 999
Canada Place, Suite 654, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 3E1.
Ivanhoe is an independent international heavy oil development and production company focused on
pursuing long term growth in its reserves and production. Ivanhoe plans to utilize advanced
technologies, such as its HTLTM technology, that are designed to significantly improve
recovery of heavy oil resources. In addition, the Company seeks to expand its reserve base and
production through conventional exploration and production of oil and gas.
The March 31, 2011 unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements (Financial
Statements) have been prepared using International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)
applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and settlement of
liabilities in the normal course of business as they become due and assumes that Ivanhoe will be
able to meet its obligations and continue operations for at least its next fiscal year.
Realization values may be substantially different from carrying values as shown and these Financial
Statements do not give effect to adjustments that may be necessary to the carrying values and
classification of assets and liabilities should the Company be unable to continue as a going
concern. Such adjustments could be material.
At March 31, 2011, Ivanhoe had an accumulated deficit of $284.3 million and working capital of
$23.6 million excluding derivative financial liabilities. In the first three months of 2011, cash
used in operating activities was $6.5 million and the Company expects to incur further losses in
the development of its business. Continuing as a going concern is dependent upon attaining future
profitable operations to repay liabilities arising in the normal course of operations and accessing
additional capital to develop the Companys properties. Ivanhoe intends to finance its future
funding requirements through a combination of strategic investors and/or public and private debt
and equity markets, either at a parent company level or at the project level. There is no assurance
that Ivanhoe will be able to obtain such financing on favorable terms, if at all. Without access to
additional financing or other cash generating activities in 2012, there is significant doubt that
the Company will be able to continue as a going concern.
The March 31, 2011 Financial Statements were approved by the Board of Directors and authorized for
issue on April 28, 2011.
The Financial Statements are presented in US dollars and all values are rounded to the nearest
thousand dollars except where otherwise indicated.
2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
2.1 Statement of Compliance
The Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with IAS 34, Interim Financial
Reporting (IAS 34), using accounting policies consistent with IFRS as issued by the
International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) that the Company expects to adopt in its
consolidated financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2011. The Financial Statements
are not subject to qualification relating to the application of IFRS as issued by the IASB.
As these are the Companys first set of Financial Statements in accordance with IFRS, the Companys
disclosures exceed the minimum requirements under IAS 34. The Company elected to exceed the minimum
requirements in order to present the Companys accounting policies in accordance with IFRS and the
additional disclosures required under IFRS, which also highlight the changes from the Companys
2010 annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with Canadian generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
2.2 Basis of Presentation
The Company adopted IFRS on January 1, 2011, with a transition date of January 1, 2010.
Comparative financial information has been restated to comply with IFRS as detailed in Note 23.
The Financial Statements have been prepared on an historical cost basis, except financial
instruments, which are measured at fair value as explained in accounting policies set out in Note
3.
7
3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
3.1 Basis of Consolidation
The Financial Statements incorporate the financial statements of the Company, its subsidiaries, all
of which are wholly owned, and special purpose entities that are controlled by the Company. All
intercompany balances, transactions, income and expenses are eliminated on consolidation. The
consolidated accounts are prepared using uniform accounting policies.
Certain of the Companys exploration and development activities are conducted jointly with others.
The Financial Statements reflect only the Companys proportionate interest in such activities.
3.2 Foreign Currency Translation
The Companys reporting currency and the functional currency of its operations is the US dollar, as
this is the principal currency of the economic environments in which it operates.
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the exchange
rate in effect on the date of the statement of financial position. Non-monetary assets and
liabilities, as well as operating transactions, are translated at the exchange rate prevailing at
the time of the transaction. Translation gains and losses are reflected in earnings.
3.3 Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents includes cash on hand, deposits at banks, short term highly liquid
investments with original maturities of three months or less and restricted cash balances that are
of a short term nature.
3.4 Intangible Assets
i. Technology Assets
The Companys HTLTM technology license (Technology Assets) is measured at cost and
classified as an intangible asset. Amortization of the Technology Assets will commence when the
technology is available for use in field operations.
ii. Exploration and Evaluation Assets
Costs of exploring for, and evaluating, oil and gas properties are initially capitalized as
intangible exploration and evaluation assets (E&E assets). Costs may include license fees,
technical studies, seismic programs, exploratory drilling and directly attributable general and
administrative costs.
If E&E assets result in sufficient proved reserves to justify commercial production and technical
feasibility can be established, the assets will be tested for impairment and reclassified as
property, plant and equipment. If E&E assets result in sufficient reserves to justify commercial
production, but those reserves cannot be classified as proved, the assets will be tested for
impairment and continue to be capitalized as intangible assets as long as progress is being made to
assess the reserves and economic viability of the well and/or related project. If sufficient
reserves cannot be established, the corresponding E&E assets are charged to exploration and
evaluation expense (E&E expense).
E&E assets which may be attributable to a broad exploration area, such as license fees, technical
studies or seismic programs, will be reclassified to PP&E or charged to E&E expense to best reflect
the nature of the assets. Costs incurred prior to establishing the legal right to explore an area
are charged to E&E expense as incurred.
8
3.5 Property, Plant and Equipment
i. Oil and Gas Property and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment (PP&E) are reported at cost less accumulated depletion,
depreciation and accumulated impairment losses. PP&E includes the purchase price, reclassified E&E
assets, any costs directly attributable to bringing the asset to the location and condition
necessary for its intended use and decommissioning costs. Interest on borrowings incurred to
finance qualifying PP&E is capitalized until the asset is capable of fulfilling its intended use.
PP&E is depleted using the unit-of-production method based on proved plus probable reserves, taking
into account associated future development costs. For purposes of these calculations, production
and reserves of natural gas are converted to barrels on an energy equivalent basis at a ratio of
six thousand cubic feet of natural gas for one barrel of oil. Depletion rates are updated annually
unless there is a material change in circumstances, in which case they would be updated more
frequently.
ii. Other Assets
Furniture and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful
life of the respective assets, at rates ranging from three to five years. The Feedstock Testing
Facility (FTF) is depreciated over its expected economic life of 20 years.
3.6 Impairment
The Company periodically assesses tangible and intangible assets or groups of assets for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be
recoverable. Individual assets are grouped into cash generating units for impairment purposes at
the lowest level at which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the
cash flows of other groups of assets.
If indicators of impairment exist, the recoverable amount of the asset group is estimated. An asset
groups recoverable amount is the higher of its fair value less costs to sell and its value in use.
In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value
using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money
and the risks specific to the asset. Where the carrying amount of an asset group exceeds its
recoverable amount, the asset group is considered impaired and is written down to its recoverable
amount.
Previously recognized impairment losses are reversed if there has been a change in the estimates
used to determine the asset groups recoverable amount. If that is the case, the carrying amount of
the asset group is increased to its revised recoverable amount which cannot exceed the carrying
amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation, had no impairment loss been recognized
in prior periods. Such a reversal is recognized in earnings. Subsequent to a reversal of
impairment, the depletion or depreciation expense is adjusted in future periods to allocate the
asset groups revised carrying amount, less any residual value, over its remaining useful life.
3.7 Decommissioning Provision
The Company recognizes a provision for decommissioning costs when it has an obligation to dismantle
and remove its PP&E or restore the site on which it is located. The provision is estimated as the
present value of the expected future expenditures, determined in accordance with local conditions
and requirements, discounted at a risk free rate. A corresponding amount is added to the carrying
value of the related asset and is amortized as an expense over the economic life of the asset. The
carrying amount of the provision is increased for the passage of time and adjusted for changes to
the current market-based discount rate, amount and/or timing of the underlying cash flows needed to
settle the obligation. Actual decommissioning costs incurred reduce the obligation. Any
difference between the recorded decommissioning provision and the actual costs incurred is recorded
as a gain or loss in the settlement period.
3.8 Provisions and Contingencies
Provisions are recognized when the Company has a present obligation (legal or constructive) that
has arisen as a result of a past event and it is probable that a future outflow of resources will
be required to settle the obligation, provided that a reliable estimate can be made of the amount
of the obligation.
Provisions are measured at the present value of the expenditures expected to be required to settle
the obligation using a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of
money and the risks specific to the obligation. When it is appropriate to discount a provision, the
increase in the provision due to passage of time is recognized as interest expense.
9
3.9 Financial Assets
Financial assets are classified as i) loans and receivables, ii) available-for-sale, iii) financial
assets at fair value through profit or loss or iv) as held-to-maturity. Ivanhoe determines the
classification of its financial assets at initial recognition. Financial assets are recognized
initially at fair value and subsequent measurement depends upon their classification.
i. Loans and Receivables
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that
are not quoted in an active market. Such assets are carried at amortized cost using the effective
interest rate method if the time value of money is significant. Gains and losses are recognized in
income when the loans and receivables are derecognized or impaired, as well as through the
amortization process. The Companys cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, note receivable
and long term receivables are classified as loans and receivables.
ii. Available-for-Sale
Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivative financial assets that are not classified as
loans and receivables. After initial recognition, available-for-sale financial assets are measured
at fair value, with gains or losses recognized within other comprehensive income. Accumulated
changes in fair value are recorded as a separate component of equity until the investment is
derecognized or impaired. The Company does not currently have any financial assets classified as
available-for-sale.
iii. Financial Assets at Fair Value through Profit or Loss
Financial assets are classified as fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL) when the financial
asset is held for trading or it is designated as FVTPL. Financial assets classified as FVTPL are
measured at fair value with unrealized gains and losses recognized through earnings. The Company
does not currently have any financial assets classified at fair value through earnings.
iv. Held-to-Maturity
Investments are recognized on a trade date basis and are initially measured at fair value,
including transaction costs. The Company does not currently have any financial assets classified as
held-to-maturity.
v. Impairment
Financial assets, other than those at FVTPL, are assessed for indicators of impairment at each
period end. Financial assets are impaired when there is evidence that the estimated future cash
flows of the investment have been impacted. For financial assets carried at amortized cost, the
amount of the impairment is the difference between the assets carrying amount and the present
value of the estimated future cash flows, discounted at the financial assets original effective
interest rate.
The carrying amount of all financial assets, excluding accounts receivables, is directly reduced by
the impairment loss. The carrying amount of accounts receivable is reduced through the use of an
allowance account. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are recorded against the
allowance account. Changes in the carrying amount of the allowance account are recognized in the
results of operations.
With the exception of available-for-sale equity instruments, which are revalued through other
comprehensive income, if, in a subsequent period, the amount of the impairment loss decreases and
the decrease relates to an event occurring after the impairment was recognized, the previously
recognized impairment loss is reversed through the earnings. On the date of impairment reversal,
the carrying amount of the financial asset cannot exceed its amortized cost had impairment not been
recognized.
10
vi. Derecognition
Financial assets are derecognized when the rights to receive cash flows from the investments have
expired or have been transferred and the Company has transferred substantially all risks and
rewards of ownership.
3.10 Financial Liabilities
Financial liabilities are classified as i) financial liabilities at FVTPL or ii) as other financial
liabilities measured at amortized cost. Ivanhoe determines the classification of its financial
liabilities at initial recognition. The measurement of financial liabilities depends on their
classification.
i. Financial Liabilities at Fair Value through Profit or Loss
Financial liabilities classified as FVTPL include financial liabilities held for trading and
financial liabilities designated upon initial recognition as FVTPL. Derivatives, including
separated embedded derivatives, are also classified as FVTPL. Fair value changes on financial
liabilities classified as FVTPL are recognized through earnings. The Companys derivative financial
instruments are classified as financial liabilities at FVTPL.
ii. Other Financial Liabilities
Financial liabilities classified as other financial liabilities are initially recognized at fair
value less directly attributable transaction costs. After initial recognition, other financial
liabilities are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method.
The Companys accounts payable and accrued liabilities, debt and long term obligation are
classified as other financial liabilities.
3.11 Oil and Gas Revenue
Sales of oil and gas are recognized when the risks and rewards of ownership pass to the buyer,
collection is reasonably assured and the price is reasonably determinable. Oil and gas revenue
represents the Companys share and is recorded net of royalty payments to governments and other
mineral interest owners.
3.12 Income Tax
Income tax expense represents the sum of tax currently payable and deferred tax.
i. Current income tax
Income tax assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount
expected to be recovered from, or paid to, the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws
used to compute the amount are those that are enacted or substantively enacted by the date of the
statement of financial position.
ii. Deferred income tax
Deferred income tax is provided, using the liability method, on temporary differences at the date
of the statement of financial position between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their
carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes.
Deferred income tax liabilities are recognized for all taxable temporary differences, except:
|
|
|
where the deferred income tax liability arises from the initial recognition of goodwill
or of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the
time of the transaction, affects neither accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss; and |
|
|
|
in respect of taxable temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries,
associates and interests in joint ventures, where the timing of the reversal of the
temporary differences can be controlled and it is probable that the temporary differences
will not reverse in the foreseeable future. |
11
Deferred tax assets are recognized for all deductible temporary differences, carry-forward of
unused tax credits and unused tax losses, to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit
will be available against which the deductible temporary differences and the carry-forward of
unused tax credits and unused tax losses can be utilized except:
|
|
|
where the deferred income tax asset relating to the deductible temporary difference
arises from the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a
business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting
profit nor taxable profit or loss; and |
|
|
|
in respect of deductible temporary differences associated with investments in
subsidiaries, jointly controlled entities and associates, deferred tax assets are
recognized only to the extent that it is probable that the temporary differences will
reverse in the foreseeable future and taxable profit will be available against which the
temporary differences can be utilized. |
The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each date of the statement of financial
position and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit
will be available to allow all or part of the deferred income tax asset to be utilized.
Unrecognized deferred income tax assets are reassessed at each date of the statement of financial
position and are recognized to the extent that it has become probable that future taxable profit
will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the
year when the asset is expected to be realized or the liability is expected to be settled, based on
tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the date of the
statement of financial position.
Deferred income tax relating to items recognized directly in equity is recognized in equity and not
in earnings.
Deferred income tax assets and deferred income tax liabilities are offset if, and only if, a
legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and
the deferred tax assets and liabilities relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation
authority on either the same taxable entity or different taxable entities which intend to either
settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis, or to realize the assets and settle the
liabilities simultaneously, in each future period in which significant amounts of deferred tax
assets or liabilities are expected to be settled or recovered.
3.13 Borrowing Costs
For qualifying assets, interest on borrowings incurred to finance E&E assets and PP&E is
capitalized until the asset is capable of fulfilling its intended use. Capitalized borrowing costs
cannot exceed the actual interest and financing costs incurred. All other interest and financing
costs are recognized in earnings in the period in which they are incurred.
3.14 Share-Based Payments
Equity settled share-based payments in the form of stock options granted to directors, employees
and those providing similar services to Ivanhoe and its subsidiaries are measured at fair value on
the grant date and expensed on a graded basis over the vesting period of each annual installment.
The cumulative expense for equity settled transactions incorporates a forfeiture rate to reflect
the Companys best estimate of the number of equity instruments that will ultimately vest.
No expense is recognized for awards that do not ultimately vest, except for awards where vesting is
conditional upon a market condition which are treated as vesting irrespective of whether or not the
market condition is satisfied provided that all other performance and/or service conditions are
satisfied.
Compensation expenses are recognized at fair value determined at the grant date when shares are
issued from the stock bonus plan. The employee share purchase portion of the plan has not yet been
activated.
12
3.15 Income or Loss per Common Share
Basic net income or loss per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share
amounts are calculated based on net income divided by dilutive common shares. Dilutive common
shares are arrived at by adding weighted average common shares to common shares issuable on
conversion of options or purchase warrants assuming that proceeds received from the exercise of
in-the-money stock options and purchase warrants are used to purchase common shares at the average
market price. Dilution from the Companys convertible debt is considered using the if converted
method.
3.16 Standards and Interpretations Issued But Not Yet Adopted
i. IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
As part of the IASBs project to replace IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and
Measurement in November 2009, the IASB issued the first phase of IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
dealing with the classification and measurement of financial assets. In October 2010, the IASB
updated IFRS 9 by incorporating requirements for the accounting for financial liabilities. The new
standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, with transitional
arrangements depending upon the date of initial application. Ivanhoe has not yet decided the date
of initial application for the Company and has not yet completed its evaluation of the effect of
adoption.
There are no other standards or interpretations in issue but not yet adopted that are anticipated
to have a material effect on the reported income or net assets of the Company.
4. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING JUDGMENTS AND KEY SOURCES OF ESTIMATION UNCERTAINITY
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires management to make
estimates and assumptions in certain circumstances that affect reported amounts. The most sensitive
estimates affecting the Financial Statements are in the areas set out below. Actual results may
differ from these estimates.
4.1 Critical Judgments in Applying Accounting Policies
i. E&E Assets
E&E assets are initially capitalized as intangible assets and reclassified as PP&E when sufficient
reserves to justify commercial production are established. E&E assets that result in sufficient
reserves to justify commercial production, but which cannot be classified as proved, continue to be
capitalized as intangible assets as long as progress is being made to assess the reserves and
economic viability of the well and/or related project. If sufficient reserves cannot be
established, the corresponding E&E assets are charged to E&E expense.
Management must determine if E&E assets, which have not yet resulted in the discovery of proved
reserves, should continue to be capitalized or charged to E&E expense. When making this
determination, management considers factors such as the Companys drilling results, planned
exploration and development activities, the financial capacity of the Company to further develop
the property, the ability to use the Companys HTL technology in certain projects, lease expiries,
market conditions and technical recommendations from its exploration staff.
ii. Impairment
a. Property, Plant and Equipment
Ivanhoe annually evaluates its oil and gas assets or groups of assets for impairment or whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Among other
things, an impairment may be triggered by falling oil and gas prices, a significant negative
revision to reserve estimates, the inability to use the Companys HTL technology in certain
projects, changes in capital costs or the inability to raise sufficient financial resources to
further develop the property. Cash flow estimates for the Companys impairment assessments require
significant assumptions about future prices and costs, production, reserves, discount rates and
potential benefits from the application of its HTL technology.
13
b. Technology Assets
The Companys Technology Assets consist of an exclusive, irrevocable license to deploy its HTL
technology. Ivanhoe annually reviews the Technology Assets for impairment or if an adverse event or
change occurs. Indicators of adverse events could include HTL patent expiries, advancements of new
technologies or the inability to successfully commercialize the HTL technology. The impairment of
the Technology Assets requires management to make assumptions about competitive technological
developments, the successful commercialization of the Companys HTL technology and future cash
flows from the HTL technology.
4.2 Key Sources of Estimation Uncertainty
i. Oil and Gas Reserves
The process of estimating quantities of reserves is inherently uncertain and complex. It requires
significant judgment and decisions based on available geological, geophysical, engineering and
economic data. These estimates may change substantially as additional data from ongoing development
activities and production becomes available and as economic conditions impacting oil and gas prices
and costs change. Such revisions could be upwards or downwards. Reserve estimates have a material
impact on depletion and the Companys impairment evaluations, which in turn have a material impact
on earnings.
Total proved and probable reserves estimates are used to determine rates that are used in the
unit-of-production depletion calculations. In the first three months of 2011, depletion expense of
$1.6 million was recorded. If proved and probable reserves estimates changed by 10%, the Companys
depletion and depreciation expense would have changed by approximately $0.2 million, assuming all
other variables remained constant.
The recoverable value of the Companys oil and gas PP&E is calculated based on future net cash
flows from proved plus probable reserves, discounted at a pre-tax rate that includes risks specific
to the asset. A 1% increase in the discount rate and a 5% decrease in the forward pricing used in
the calculation of cash flows from proved plus probable reserves as at March 31, 2011, would not
impair the Companys development projects.
ii. HTL Technology
Future cash flows from HTL technology is a key source of estimation uncertainty as it requires
management to make assumptions about the successful commercialization of the HTL technology and
competitive technological developments. Success in commercializing the HTL technology in the oil
and gas industry depends on the Companys ability to economically design, construct and operate
commercial-scale plants and a variety of other factors. Ivanhoe expects that technological
advances in the processes and procedures for upgrading heavy oil and bitumen into lighter, less
viscous products will continue to progress. It is possible that those advances could cause the HTL
technology to become uncompetitive or obsolete.
iii. Decommissioning Provisions
The Company recognizes a provision for decommissioning costs when it has an obligation to dismantle
and remove its PP&E or restore the site on which it is located. Decommissioning activities
generally occur many years in the future and precise abandonment requirements and techniques are
uncertain at the time the decommissioning liability is recorded. Removal technologies and
associated costs are constantly changing, as well as political, environmental, legal, safety and
public expectations. Consequently, estimated decommissioning provisions are a key source of
estimation uncertainty.
iv. Option Pricing Models
The Company uses the Black Scholes option pricing model to calculate the fair value of the
convertible portion of the convertible promissory note, stock options granted to directors,
officers, employees and service providers and the derivative financial liabilities. Option pricing
models require the input of highly subjective assumptions regarding the expected volatility.
Changes in assumptions can materially affect the estimated fair value, and therefore, the existing
models do not necessarily provide precise measure of fair value.
14
v. Subsidiary Option
In January 2010, one of the Companys subsidiaries granted a private investor an option (the
Subsidiary Option) to acquire an equity interest in the subsidiary representing 20% of the
subsidiarys currently issued share capital (16.67% of the enlarged share capital immediately
following the exercise of the Subsidiary Option) for Cdn$25.0 million. If the Subsidiary Option is
exercised, Cdn$25 million of existing inter-corporate indebtedness owed by the subsidiary to the
Company (through an intermediate subsidiary) will be converted into additional common shares of the
subsidiary, thereby diluting the private investors equity interest to 14.286%. The fair value of
the Subsidiary Option, calculated using the Black Scholes option pricing model, used an estimated
share value and assumed the volatility to be similar to Ivanhoe.
vi. Deferred Income Taxes
Ivanhoe operates in a specialized industry in several tax jurisdictions. As a result, income is
subject to various rates of taxation. The breadth of the Companys operations and the global
complexity of tax regulations require assessments of uncertainties and judgments in estimating the
taxes it will ultimately pay. The final taxes paid are dependent upon many factors, including
negotiations with taxing authorities in various jurisdictions, uncertain tax positions and
resolution of disputes arising from federal, provincial, state and local tax audits. The resolution
of these uncertainties and the associated final taxes may result in adjustments to the Companys
tax assets and tax liabilities.
5. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash at banks and on hand |
|
|
56,805 |
|
|
|
10,147 |
|
|
|
6,797 |
|
Term deposits |
|
|
23,470 |
|
|
|
57,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
Money market accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,715 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
2,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,798 |
|
|
|
68,317 |
|
|
|
24,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash includes funds pledged as security for a letter of credit with a short term
maturity and cash held in escrow.
6. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and Evaluation Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
HTLTM |
|
|
Total Intangible |
|
|
|
Asia |
|
|
Canada |
|
|
America |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Technology |
|
|
Assets |
|
Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2010 |
|
|
14,411 |
|
|
|
94,431 |
|
|
|
6,755 |
|
|
|
115,597 |
|
|
|
92,153 |
|
|
|
207,750 |
|
Additions during the period |
|
|
27,261 |
|
|
|
29,324 |
|
|
|
17,704 |
|
|
|
74,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,289 |
|
Exploration and evaluation expense |
|
|
(3,537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,934 |
) |
|
|
(8,471 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,471 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2010 |
|
|
38,135 |
|
|
|
123,755 |
|
|
|
19,525 |
|
|
|
181,415 |
|
|
|
92,153 |
|
|
|
273,568 |
|
Additions during the period |
|
|
6,499 |
|
|
|
2,756 |
|
|
|
1,326 |
|
|
|
10,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2011 |
|
|
44,634 |
|
|
|
126,511 |
|
|
|
20,851 |
|
|
|
191,996 |
|
|
|
92,153 |
|
|
|
284,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of the HTLTM technology has not commenced and its carrying value had
not been impaired since it was acquired in 2005.
In the three months ended March 31, 2011, $0.7 million (year ended December 31, 2010 $2.1
million) in employee benefits directly attributable to E&E assets were capitalized.
15
7. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and Gas Property and Equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Asia |
|
|
Canada |
|
|
America |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
PP&E |
|
Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2010 |
|
|
31,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,816 |
|
|
|
11,373 |
|
|
|
43,189 |
|
Additions during the period |
|
|
4,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,123 |
|
|
|
1,648 |
|
|
|
5,771 |
|
Disposals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2010 |
|
|
35,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,939 |
|
|
|
13,009 |
|
|
|
48,948 |
|
Additions during the period |
|
|
3,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,530 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
3,949 |
|
Disposals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2011 |
|
|
39,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,469 |
|
|
|
13,423 |
|
|
|
52,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,206 |
|
|
|
1,206 |
|
Depletion and depreciation for the period |
|
|
6,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,196 |
|
|
|
934 |
|
|
|
7,130 |
|
Disposals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2010 |
|
|
6,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,196 |
|
|
|
2,134 |
|
|
|
8,330 |
|
Depletion and depreciation for the period |
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
1,832 |
|
Disposals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2011 |
|
|
7,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,772 |
|
|
|
2,389 |
|
|
|
10,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Book Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at January 1, 2010 |
|
|
31,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,816 |
|
|
|
10,167 |
|
|
|
41,983 |
|
As at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
29,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,743 |
|
|
|
10,875 |
|
|
|
40,618 |
|
As at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
31,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,697 |
|
|
|
11,034 |
|
|
|
42,731 |
|
Oil and Gas Property and Equipment
In the three months ended March 31, 2011, nil (year ended December 31, 2010 $0.1 million) in
employee benefits directly attributable to PP&E were capitalized.
Other Assets
Other assets includes the Companys FTF at the Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio, Texas,
and general furniture and fixtures.
16
8. DEBT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Convertible note |
|
|
41,178 |
|
|
|
40,217 |
|
|
|
38,005 |
|
Unamortized discount |
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
(385 |
) |
|
|
(1,071 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount |
|
|
40,985 |
|
|
|
39,832 |
|
|
|
36,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the acquisition of the Tamarack leases in July 2008 from Talisman Energy
Canada (Talisman), the Company issued a Cdn$40.0 million convertible promissory note (the
Convertible Note) which matures in July 2011. Interest at the prime rate plus 2% is calculated
daily and is payable semi-annually. The outstanding principal amount is convertible, at Talismans
option, into a maximum of 12,779,552 Ivanhoe common shares at Cdn$3.13 per common share. The
interest rate on the Convertible Note at March 31, 2011 was 5.00% (December 31, 2010 5.00%,
January 1, 2010 4.25%).
Financial instruments with an exercise price denominated in a currency other than the Companys
functional currency are accounted for as derivatives. The Convertible Note is therefore considered
to be a hybrid instrument with the embedded convertible component recognized as a derivative
financial instrument (refer to Note 9 and 10) and the liability component recorded as debt.
The Companys obligations under the Convertible Note are secured by a first fixed charge and
security interest in favor of Talisman against the acquired Talisman leases and the related assets
acquired by the Company pursuant to the Talisman lease acquisition.
In the three months ended March 31, 2011, $0.7 million (three months ended March 31, 2010 $0.6
million, year ended December 31, 2010 $2.5 million) of interest from the Convertible Note was
capitalized to E&E assets. No interest from the Convertible Note was recorded as interest expense
in the three months ended March 31, 2011 (year ended December 31, 2010 nil).
9. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
9.1 Fair Value of Financial Instruments Measured at Amortized Cost
Except as detailed below, the fair value of the Companys financial instruments recognized at
amortized cost approximates their carrying value due to the demand nature or short term maturity of
these instruments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Amount |
|
|
40,985 |
|
|
|
39,832 |
|
|
|
36,934 |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
40,189 |
|
|
|
40,193 |
|
|
|
35,950 |
|
The fair value of the liability component of the Convertible Note was estimated using a
discounted cash flow calculation, assuming redemption in July 2011 and an interest rate of 5.0% at
March 31, 2011 (December 31, 2010 5.0%).
9.2 Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value Through Profit and Loss
The Company classifies its financial instruments according to the fair value hierarchy outlined in
IFRS 7, Financial Instruments: Disclosures, as described below:
|
|
|
Level 1 using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
Level 2 using inputs for the asset or liability, other than quoted prices, that are
observable either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices). |
|
|
|
Level 3 using inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable
market data, such as prices based on internal models or other valuation methods. |
17
The following table presents the Companys derivative financial instruments measured at FVTPL:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2009 & 2010 |
|
|
Convertible |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
Component |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
of Debt |
|
|
Option |
|
|
Value |
|
Balance January 1, 2010 |
|
|
7,582 |
|
|
|
667 |
|
|
|
4,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,023 |
|
Issuance of purchase warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,999 |
|
Exercise of purchase warrants |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Derivative gains through profit and loss |
|
|
(1,964 |
) |
|
|
(13,050 |
) |
|
|
(3,558 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,572 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2010 |
|
|
5,615 |
|
|
|
1,616 |
|
|
|
1,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,447 |
|
Exercise of purchase warrants |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(3,107 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,109 |
) |
Expiration of purchase warrants through profit and loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,477 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,477 |
) |
Derivative (gains) losses through profit and loss |
|
|
(3,267 |
) |
|
|
2,968 |
|
|
|
(537 |
) |
|
|
1,186 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2011 |
|
|
2,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
1,186 |
|
|
|
4,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The gain on derivative instruments of $1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011,
(three months ended March 31, 2010 $2.1 million, year ended December 31, 2010 $18.6 million)
originated from the expiration and revaluation of derivative financial instruments measured at
FVTPL.
Where the instrument is quoted in an active market, the movement in fair value due to credit risk
is calculated as the change in fair value that is not attributable to changes in market risk. Where
the instrument is not quoted in an active market, the fair value is calculated using a valuation
technique that incorporates credit risk by discounting the cash flows using a credit-adjusted rate
which reflects the level at which the Company could issue similar instruments at the reporting
date. The amount of change in the fair value, during the period and cumulatively, of designated
financial liabilities through FVTPL that is attributable to changes in credit risk is determined to
be nil.
9.3 Risks Arising from Financial Instruments
In the normal course of operations, the Company is exposed to market risks resulting from movements
in commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates, which may result in
fluctuations in the fair value or future cash flows of its financial instruments.
i. Commodity Price Risks
Commodity price risk refers to the risk that the value of a financial instrument or cash flows
associated with the instrument will fluctuate due to the changes in market commodity prices. Oil
prices and quality differentials are influenced by worldwide factors such as OPEC actions,
political events and supply and demand fundamentals. The Company may periodically use different
types of derivative instruments to manage its exposure to price volatility. However, no hedging
contracts were in place in the first three months of 2011.
ii. Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
Ivanhoe is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk as a result of incurring capital
expenditures and operating costs in currencies other than the US dollar. A substantial portion of
the Companys activities are transacted in, or referenced to, US dollars, including oil sales in
Asia, capital spending in Ecuador and ongoing FTF operations. A portion of transactions are in
other currencies, such as Dagang operating costs paid in Chinese renminbi, Tamarack exploration
activities funded in Canadian dollars and the purchase warrants exercised in 2011. The Company has
not entered into any foreign currency derivatives to date in 2011, nor does the Company anticipate
using foreign currency derivatives in the remainder of the year. To help reduce the Companys
exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk, the Company seeks to hold assets and liabilities
denominated in the same currency when appropriate.
18
The following table shows the Companys exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk on its net
loss and comprehensive loss for March 31, 2011, assuming reasonably possible changes in the
relevant foreign currency. This analysis assumes all other variables remain constant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change From a 10% |
|
|
Change From a 10% |
|
(Increase) Decrease in Net Loss and Comprehensive Loss |
|
Increase or Weakening |
|
|
Decrease or Strengthening |
|
Chinese renminbi |
|
|
605 |
|
|
|
(740 |
) |
Canadian dollar |
|
|
(1,715 |
) |
|
|
2,040 |
|
iii. Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial
instrument will fluctuate as a result of changes in market interest rates. Interest rate risk
arises from interest-bearing borrowings which have a variable interest rate. The Companys net loss
and accumulated deficit would not have been impacted by an interest rate change in the first
quarter of 2011 as interest on the Companys debt related to the Convertible Note is capitalized.
iv. Credit Risk
Ivanhoe is exposed to credit risk with respect to its cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, note receivable and long term receivables. The Companys maximum exposure to credit
risk at March 31, 2011, is represented by the carrying amount of these non-derivative financial
assets.
The Company believes its exposure to credit risk related to cash and cash equivalents is minimal
due to the quality of the financial institutions where the funds are held and the nature of the
deposit instruments. Most of the Companys credit exposures are with counterparties in the energy
industry and are therefore exposed to normal industry credit risks. Ivanhoe manages its credit risk
by entering into sales contracts only with established entities.
Currently, all of the Companys oil production is sold to one national oil corporation. As a
result, 92% of the outstanding accounts receivable balance at March 31, 2011 (December 31, 2010
85%, January 1, 2010 94%) is due from a national oil corporation. Long term receivables are
composed of value-added tax receivable amounts from Ecuador and will be recoverable upon
commencement of commercial operations. Ivanhoe considers the risk of default on these items to be
low due to the Companys ongoing operations in China and Ecuador.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Accounts receivable current |
|
|
6,508 |
|
|
|
6,329 |
|
|
|
5,004 |
|
Accounts receivable over 90 days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,508 |
|
|
|
6,359 |
|
|
|
5,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
v. Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that suitable sources of funding for the Companys business
activities may not be available. Since cash flows from existing operations are insufficient to fund
future capital expenditures, Ivanhoe intends to finance future capital projects with a combination
of strategic investors and/or public and private debt and equity markets, either at a parent
company level or at the project level or from the sale of existing assets. There is no assurance
that the Company will be able to obtain such financing on favorable terms, if at all.
19
The contractual maturity of the fixed and floating rate derivative and non-derivative
financial liabilities are shown in the table below. The amounts presented represent the future
undiscounted principal and interest cash flows and therefore may not equate to the values presented
in the statement of financial position.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
As at March 31, 2011 |
|
1 year |
|
Derivative financial liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Purchase warrants |
|
|
2,346 |
|
Convertible component of note |
|
|
679 |
|
Subsidiary option |
|
|
1,186 |
|
Non-derivative financial liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
24,702 |
|
Debt and interest |
|
|
42,285 |
|
10. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Companys derivative financial instruments are comprised of common share purchase warrants and
the convertible component of the Convertible Note.
10.1 Purchase Warrants
The following table reflects the changes in the Companys purchase warrants outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
Shares |
|
(000s) |
|
Warrants |
|
|
Issuable |
|
Balance January 1, 2010 |
|
|
12,135 |
|
|
|
12,135 |
|
Private placements |
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
12,500 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2010 |
|
|
24,633 |
|
|
|
24,633 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(8,620 |
) |
|
|
(8,620 |
) |
Expired |
|
|
(4,619 |
) |
|
|
(4,619 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2011 |
|
|
11,394 |
|
|
|
11,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2011, the purchase warrants issued in 2006 remained exercisable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price Per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Cash Value on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special |
|
|
Outstanding(1) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price Per |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Valuation |
|
Year of Issue |
|
Warrant |
|
|
(000s) |
|
|
($US000s) |
|
|
Expiry Date |
|
|
Share |
|
|
($US000s) |
|
|
Method |
|
2006 |
|
|
US$2.23 |
|
|
|
11,394 |
|
|
|
2,346 |
|
|
May 2011 |
|
|
Cdn$2.93 |
(2) |
|
|
34,365 |
|
|
Quoted Market Price |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
One common share is issuable for each purchase warrant upon exercise. |
|
(2) |
|
Each common share purchase warrant originally entitled the holder to purchase one
common share at a price of US$2.63 per share until the fifth anniversary date of the closing.
In September 2006, these warrants were listed on the TSX and the exercise price was changed
to Cdn$2.93. |
20
At December 31, 2010, the following purchase warrants were exercisable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price Per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Cash Value on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special |
|
|
Outstanding(1) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price Per |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Valuation |
|
Year of Issue |
|
Warrant |
|
|
(000s) |
|
|
($US000s) |
|
|
Expiry Date |
|
|
Share |
|
|
($US000s) |
|
|
Method |
|
2006 |
|
|
US$2.23 |
|
|
|
11,398 |
|
|
|
5,615 |
|
|
May 2011 |
|
|
Cdn$2.93 |
(2) |
|
|
33,577 |
|
|
Quoted Market Price |
|
2009 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
Feb 2011 |
|
|
Cdn$4.05 |
|
|
|
2,993 |
|
|
Black-Scholes |
|
2010 |
|
|
Cdn$3.00 |
|
|
|
10,417 |
|
|
|
1,326 |
|
|
Feb 2011 |
|
|
Cdn$3.16 |
|
|
|
33,095 |
|
|
Black-Scholes |
|
2010 |
|
|
Cdn$3.00 |
|
|
|
2,083 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
Feb 2011 |
|
|
Cdn$3.16 |
|
|
|
6,619 |
|
|
Black-Scholes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,633 |
|
|
|
7,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
One common share is issuable for each purchase warrant upon exercise. |
|
(2) |
|
Each common share purchase warrant originally entitled the holder to purchase one
common share at a price of $2.63 per share until the fifth anniversary date of the closing.
In September 2006, these warrants were listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange and the
exercise price was changed to Cdn$2.93. |
At December 31, 2010, the fair value of the purchase warrants issued in 2009 and 2010 was
calculated using a weighted average risk-free interest rate of 1.0%, a dividend yield of 0.0%, a
weighted average volatility factor of 66.6% and an expected life of two months. If the volatility
used to fair value the purchase warrants decreased by 10%, the fair value would decrease by $0.4
million. Increasing the volatility by 10% would have had the opposite, but approximately equal,
impact.
10.2 Convertible Note
The Company issued a Cdn$40.0 million Convertible Note, as described in Note 8. The outstanding
principal amount is convertible, at Talismans option, into common shares of the Company. The fair
value of the convertible component was $0.7 million at March 31, 2011 (December 31, 2010 $1.2
million), calculated with the Black Scholes valuation method using a weighted average risk-free
interest rate of 1.0%, a dividend yield of 0.0%, a weighted average volatility factor of 30% and an
expected life of approximately three months.
If the volatility used to fair value the convertible component decreased by 10%, the fair value
would decrease by $0.5 million. Increasing the volatility by 10% would increase the fair value by
$0.6 million.
10.3 Subsidiary Option
In January 2010, one of the Companys subsidiaries granted a private investor an option (the
Subsidiary Option) to acquire an equity interest in the subsidiary representing 20% of the
subsidiarys currently issued share capital (16.67% of the enlarged share capital immediately
following the exercise of the Subsidiary Option) for Cdn$25.0 million. If the Subsidiary Option is
exercised, Cdn$25 million of existing inter-corporate indebtedness owed by the subsidiary to the
Company (through an intermediate subsidiary) will be converted into additional common shares of the
subsidiary, thereby diluting the private investors equity interest to 14.286%. The Subsidiary
Option is valid for one year and did not become exercisable until the first quarter of 2011. The
option was determined to have a nominal value on the date of grant.
The fair value of the Subsidiary Option as at March 31, 2011, was calculated using the Black
Scholes valuation method using an estimated share value of $19.69, an exercise price of $30.00 per
share, a risk-free interest rate of 1.4%, a dividend yield of 0.0%, an expected life of
approximately one year and an estimated volatility of 55.8%, which is similar to Ivanhoe.
If the estimated volatility used to fair value the Subsidiary Option increased by 10%, the fair
value would increase by $0.5 million. Decreasing the volatility by 10% would have had the
opposite, but approximately equal, impact.
21
11. LONG TERM PROVISIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Decommissioning provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
|
1,040 |
|
Liabilities incurred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
642 |
|
Liabilities settled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(179 |
) |
Revisions in cash flow estimates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(488 |
) |
Unwinding of discount |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Change in discount rates |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
Long term obligation |
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,031 |
|
|
|
3,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1 Decommissioning Provision
The decommissioning provision represents the present value of decommissioning costs related to oil
and gas properties in Canada, the FTF, and oil and gas properties in Ecuador, which are expected to
be incurred in 2013, 2029 and 2038 respectively. The Company records a provision for the estimated
future cost of decommissioning oil and gas properties and the FTF on a discounted basis. The
provision for the costs of decommissioning these oil and gas properties and the FTF at the end of
their economic lives has been estimated, at current prices or long term assumptions, depending on
the expected timing of the activity, and discounted using a time value of money rate of 1.7% to
3.6% at March 31, 2011 (December 31, 2010 2.0% to 3.7%).
11.2 Long term obligation
As part of a 2005 merger agreement, the Company assumed an obligation to pay $1.9 million in the
event, and at such time that, the sale of units incorporating the HTLTM technology for
petroleum applications reach a total of $100.0 million.
12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
12.1 Income Taxes
The Company has an uncertain tax position in China related to when it is entitled to take tax
deductions on capitalized development costs that are amortized on a straight-line basis. To the
extent that there is a different interpretation in the timing of the deductibility of development
costs, this could potentially result in an increase in the current tax expense of $0.9 million.
The Company has an uncertain tax position related to the calculation of a gain on the consideration
received from two farm-out transactions. To the extent that the calculation of the gain is
interpreted differently and the amounts are subject to withholding tax, there would be an
additional current tax expense of approximately $0.7 million.
No amounts have been recorded in the Financial Statements related to the above mentioned uncertain
tax positions as management has determined the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome to the Company
to be low.
12.2 Operating Lease Arrangements
In the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company expended $0.5 million (three months ended
March 31, 2010 $0.5 million) on operating leases relating to the rental of office space, which
expire between May 2011 and December 2013.
At March 31, 2011, future net minimum payments for operating leases were:
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2011 |
|
|
1,372 |
|
2012-2013 |
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
22
12.3 Other
The Company may be required to make a Cdn$15.0 million cash payment to Talisman upon receiving
government and other approvals necessary to develop the northern border of one of the Tamarack
leases.
Occasionally, Ivanhoe enters into consulting agreements whereby a success fee may be payable if and
when either a definitive agreement is signed or certain other contractual milestones are met. Under
these agreements, the consultant may receive cash, common shares, stock options or some combination
thereof.
From time to time, Ivanhoe is involved in litigation or has claims brought against it in the normal
course of business. Management is currently not aware of any claims that would materially affect
the reported financial position or results of operations.
13. SHARE CAPITAL
|
|
|
Authorized
|
|
Unlimited common shares with no par value
Unlimited preferred shares with no par value |
|
|
|
Issued and Outstanding
|
|
343,932,658 common shares (December 31, 2010 334,365,482)
Nil preferred shares (December 31, 2010 nil) |
See the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the change in common
shares issued in the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
14. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
The Company has an equity-settled incentive plan under which it may i) grant stock options to
directors and eligible employees to purchase common shares, ii) issue common shares to directors
and eligible employees as bonus awards, and iii) issue common shares under a share purchase plan
for eligible employees. The total number of common shares that may be issued under this plan cannot
exceed 7% of the Companys issued and outstanding common shares. The share purchase plan has not
yet been activated.
Stock options are issued at the weighted-average trading price for the five days immediately
preceding the award and are conditional on continuing employment. Expiration and vesting periods
are set at the discretion of the Board of Directors, but typically vest over three to four years
and expire five to ten years from the date of issue.
The weighted average fair value of stock options granted during the three months ended March
31, 2011 was Cdn$2.28 (three months ended March 31, 2010 Cdn$2.80) per option at the grant date
using the Black Scholes option pricing model. The weighted average assumptions used for the
calculation were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Expected life (in years) |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
Volatility (1) |
|
|
74.4 |
% |
|
|
77.5 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free rate |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
Estimated forfeiture rate |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Expected volatility factor based on historical volatility of the Companys publicly
traded common shares. |
The Companys stock-based compensation related to option awards were classified as general and
administrative or operating expenses in earnings. In the three months ended March 31, 2011, nil
(three months ended March 31, 2010 $0.8 million) of share-based payments was capitalized to
intangible exploration and evaluation assets.
23
Details of transactions under the share options plan are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Stock Options |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Stock Options |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
|
(000s) |
|
|
(Cdn$) |
|
|
(000s) |
|
|
(Cdn$) |
|
Outstanding, beginning of period |
|
|
16,927 |
|
|
|
2.24 |
|
|
|
15,013 |
|
|
|
2.27 |
|
Granted |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
3.44 |
|
|
|
6,041 |
|
|
|
2.56 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,480 |
) |
|
|
2.41 |
|
|
|
(2,743 |
) |
|
|
2.28 |
|
Expired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(635 |
) |
|
|
2.60 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2.30 |
|
|
|
(749 |
) |
|
|
2.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of period |
|
|
15,496 |
|
|
|
2.21 |
|
|
|
16,927 |
|
|
|
2.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, end of period |
|
|
6,478 |
|
|
|
2.06 |
|
|
|
7,324 |
|
|
|
2.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average share price at the date of exercise for share options exercised during
the period was Cdn$3.30.
The following table summarizes information in respect of stock options outstanding and
exercisable at March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Contractual Life |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Range of Exercise Prices (Cdn$) |
|
(000s) |
|
|
(years) |
|
|
(Cdn$) |
|
1.51 to 2.06 |
|
|
5,788 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
1.71 |
|
2.15 to 2.71 |
|
|
7,535 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
2.33 |
|
2.77 to 3.44 |
|
|
2,173 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
3.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,496 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
2.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. RETIREMENT PLANS
In 2001, the Company adopted a defined contribution retirement or thrift plan (401(k) Plan) to
assist US employees in providing for retirement or other future financial needs. Employees
contributions (up to the maximum allowed by US tax laws) are matched 100% by the Company. Payments
are also made to a state managed plan for employees in China.
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company paid $0.2 million for retirement plan
contributions (three months ended March 31, 2010 $0.2 million).
16. SEGMENT INFORMATION
Ivanhoes organizational structure reflects its various operating activities and the geographic
areas in which it operates. Oil and gas operations are divided into three geographic segments:
Asia, Canada and Latin America. Asian operations capture the Companys oil production in Dagang
and Daqing and exploration at Zitong in China as well as exploration in Mongolia. The Canadian
segment comprises activities from Ivanhoes oil sands development project at Tamarack in Alberta,
Canada. Latin America consists of exploration and development of Block 20 in Ecuador.
The Technology Development area captures costs incurred to develop, enhance and identify
improvements in the application of the Companys HTL technology. The Corporate area consists of
costs that are not directly allocable to operating projects, such as executive officers, corporate
financings and other general corporate activities.
In prior years, the Companys business development activities were included in a combined Business
and Technology Development segment. The comparative information below has been restated to
reclassify business development activities to the Corporate segment.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as the Companys accounting policies described
in Note 3. Segment results include transactions between business segments. Corporate activities
undertaken on behalf of a segment are allocated at cost. Oil revenue is classified according to the
geographic location of the production. Segment liabilities include intercompany balances.
24
The following tables present the Companys segment information, capital investments and
identifiable assets and liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latin |
|
|
Technology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2011 |
|
Asia |
|
|
Canada |
|
|
America |
|
|
Development |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil(1) |
|
|
8,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,119 |
|
Interest |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
8,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
3,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,523 |
|
Exploration and evaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
2,772 |
|
|
|
1,306 |
|
|
|
1,680 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
7,149 |
|
|
|
13,417 |
|
Depletion and depreciation |
|
|
1,605 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
1,831 |
|
Foreign currency exchange gain |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
(225 |
) |
Derivative instruments (gain) loss |
|
|
1,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,315 |
) |
|
|
(1,129 |
) |
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,863 |
|
|
|
1,307 |
|
|
|
1,707 |
|
|
|
1,857 |
|
|
|
4,691 |
|
|
|
18,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(743 |
) |
|
|
(1,307 |
) |
|
|
(1,707 |
) |
|
|
(1,857 |
) |
|
|
(4,625 |
) |
|
|
(10,239 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Provision for) recovery of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
(264 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
(322 |
) |
Deferred |
|
|
(1,165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(391 |
) |
|
|
991 |
|
|
|
(565 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,429 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(391 |
) |
|
|
933 |
|
|
|
(887 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss and comprehensive loss |
|
|
(2,172 |
) |
|
|
(1,307 |
) |
|
|
(1,707 |
) |
|
|
(2,248 |
) |
|
|
(3,692 |
) |
|
|
(11,126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital investments Intangible |
|
|
6,499 |
|
|
|
2,539 |
|
|
|
1,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,364 |
|
Capital investments Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
3,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets(2) |
|
|
91,835 |
|
|
|
126,708 |
|
|
|
28,042 |
|
|
|
102,092 |
|
|
|
70,388 |
|
|
|
419,065 |
|
Liabilities(3) |
|
|
123,714 |
|
|
|
135,402 |
|
|
|
45,434 |
|
|
|
79,189 |
|
|
|
(288,729 |
) |
|
|
95,010 |
|
As at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets(2) |
|
|
85,273 |
|
|
|
123,890 |
|
|
|
24,392 |
|
|
|
101,899 |
|
|
|
58,964 |
|
|
|
394,418 |
|
Liabilities(3) |
|
|
114,980 |
|
|
|
131,277 |
|
|
|
42,162 |
|
|
|
76,747 |
|
|
|
(271,232 |
) |
|
|
93,934 |
|
As at January 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets(2) |
|
|
57,528 |
|
|
|
94,594 |
|
|
|
7,778 |
|
|
|
101,893 |
|
|
|
19,158 |
|
|
|
280,951 |
|
Liabilities(3) |
|
|
81,047 |
|
|
|
98,262 |
|
|
|
13,145 |
|
|
|
56,909 |
|
|
|
(162,821 |
) |
|
|
86,542 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All revenues in Asia are generated from the sale of oil production in China to one
customer. |
|
(2) |
|
Assets include investments in subsidiaries that are eliminated for consolidation under
Corporate. |
|
(3) |
|
Liabilities for Corporate include intercompany receivables of $368.1 million at March
31, 2011 (December 31, 2010 $352.5 million; January 1, 2010 $216.7 million) resulting
in a negative balance. |
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latin |
|
|
Technology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2010 |
|
Asia |
|
|
Canada |
|
|
America |
|
|
Development |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil(1) |
|
|
5,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,330 |
|
Interest |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
5,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
2,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,454 |
|
Exploration and evaluation |
|
|
606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
606 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
1,213 |
|
|
|
972 |
|
|
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
4,344 |
|
|
|
8,432 |
|
Depletion and depreciation |
|
|
1,723 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(243 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
1,537 |
|
Foreign currency exchange (gain) loss |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,188 |
) |
|
|
(4,187 |
) |
Derivative instruments loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,057 |
|
|
|
2,057 |
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,787 |
|
|
|
967 |
|
|
|
1,682 |
|
|
|
1,206 |
|
|
|
2,261 |
|
|
|
11,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(455 |
) |
|
|
(967 |
) |
|
|
(1,682 |
) |
|
|
(1,206 |
) |
|
|
(2,244 |
) |
|
|
(6,554 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(79 |
) |
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(251 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss and comprehensive loss |
|
|
(533 |
) |
|
|
(967 |
) |
|
|
(1,682 |
) |
|
|
(1,378 |
) |
|
|
(2,245 |
) |
|
|
(6,805 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital investments Intangible |
|
|
1,927 |
|
|
|
17,428 |
|
|
|
3,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,082 |
|
Capital investments Property, plant & equipment |
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All revenues in Asia are generated from the sale of oil production in China to one
customer. |
26
17. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
The Company defines capital as total shareholders equity and debt. At March 31, 2011, the Company
is not subject to any financial covenants. The Companys objectives are to safeguard Ivanhoes
ability to continue as a going concern, to continue the exploration and development of its projects
and to maintain a flexible capital structure which optimizes the costs of capital at an acceptable
risk.
The Companys main source of funds has historically been public and private equity and debt
markets. The Company does not anticipate cash flow from operating activities will be sufficient to
meet its operating and capital obligations and, as such, the Company intends to finance its
operating and capital projects from a combination of strategic investors in its projects and/or
public and private debt and equity markets, either at a parent company level or at a project level.
To manage its capital requirements, the Company prepares an annual expenditure budget that is
updated periodically. The annual and updated budgets are approved by the Board of Directors.
In order to maximize ongoing development efforts, the Company does not pay dividends. The Companys
invests its cash in highly liquid, short term, interest-bearing investments with maturities of 90
days or less to correspond with the expected timing of expenditures.
18. OPERATING EXPENSES
Operating expenses for the Company are comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Asia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Field operating |
|
|
1,623 |
|
|
|
1,297 |
|
Windfall levy |
|
|
1,577 |
|
|
|
811 |
|
Engineering support |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,310 |
|
|
|
2,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology Development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FTF operating costs |
|
|
1,213 |
|
|
|
1,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs |
|
|
4,523 |
|
|
|
3,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The windfall levy is imposed by Chinas Ministry of Finance at the progressive rates from 20%
to 40% on the portion of the monthly weighted average sales price of the crude oil lifted in China
exceeding US$40.00 per barrel.
19. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
19.1 Cash Payments For Interest And Taxes
The Company made the following cash payments for interest and income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
427 |
|
Interest |
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued for bonuses and services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
799 |
|
27
19.2 Changes in Non-Cash Activities
The Company incurred the following non-cash transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(624 |
) |
|
|
244 |
|
Note receivable |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
Prepaid and other current assets |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
1,972 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
(350 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,796 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
Prepaid and other current assets |
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
1,267 |
|
|
|
822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,475 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,252 |
|
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Ivanhoe is party to cost sharing agreements with other companies which are related or controlled
through common directors or shareholders. Through these agreements, we share office space,
furnishings, equipment, air travel and communications facilities in various international
locations. We also share the costs of employing administrative and non-executive management
personnel at these offices. The Company is billed on a cost recovery basis in most cases. These
transactions have been measured at their exchange amount.
The breakdown of the related party expenses for the three months ended March 31 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Party |
|
Nature of Transaction |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Global Mining Management Corp. |
|
Administration |
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
Ivanhoe Capital Aviation Ltd. |
|
Aircraft |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
I2MS.Net PTE Ltd. |
|
Information systems |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Ivanhoe Capital Services Ltd. |
|
Administration |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
SouthGobi Resources Ltd. |
|
Administration |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
GoviEx Gold Inc. |
|
Business development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
1092155 Ontario Inc. |
|
HTLTM technology |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Ensyn Technologies Inc. |
|
HTLTM technology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
Ivanhoe Capital PTE Ltd. |
|
Administration |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. |
|
Administration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The liabilities of the Company include the following amounts due to related parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
January 1, |
|
Related Party |
|
Nature of Transaction |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Global Mining Management Corp. |
|
Administration |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
I2MS.Net PTE Ltd. |
|
Information systems |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
SouthGobi Resources Ltd. |
|
Administration |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ivanhoe Capital Services Ltd. |
|
Management |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Ensyn Technologies Inc. |
|
HTLTM technology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ivanhoe Capital PTE Ltd. |
|
Administration |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
21. REMUNERATION OF KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL
The remuneration of directors and other key members of management was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Base salaries or fees and other cash payments |
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
705 |
|
Employers contributions to retirement plan |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,514 |
|
|
|
1,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22. INVESTMENTS IN SUBSIDIARIES
Ivanhoe has investments in the following 100% owned subsidiaries which principally affect the
operating results or net assets of the Company. Subsidiaries which are inactive or immaterial have
been omitted.
|
|
|
Name of Subsidiary |
|
Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Formation |
Sunwing Holding Corporation * |
|
Barbados |
Sunwing Energy Ltd. |
|
Bermuda |
Sunwing Zitong Energy Ltd. |
|
British Virgin Islands |
Pan-China Resources Ltd. |
|
British Virgin Islands |
Ivanhoe Energy Mongolia Inc. * |
|
Alberta |
PanAsian Energy Ltd. |
|
Nevis |
Shaman LLC |
|
Mongolia |
Ivanhoe Energy Latin America Inc. * |
|
British Columbia |
Ivanhoe Energy Ecuador Inc. |
|
British Columbia |
Ivanhoe Energy Canada Inc. * |
|
Alberta |
Ivanhoe Energy Holdings Inc. * |
|
Nevada |
Ivanhoe HTL Petroleum Ltd |
|
Nevada |
|
|
|
* |
|
subsidiary held directly by Ivanhoe Energy Inc. All other companies are held through
subsidiary undertakings. |
23. FIRST TIME ADOPTION OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS
The Company adopted IFRS on January 1, 2011, with a transition date of January 1, 2010. Under IFRS
1, First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards, the standards are applied
retrospectively at the transition date with all adjustments to assets and liabilities taken to
retained earnings unless certain exemptions are applied.
23.1 Exemptions from Full Retrospective Application.
IFRS 1 outline specific guidelines that a first-time adopter must adhere to under certain
circumstances. None of the mandatory exemptions from retrospective application were applicable to
Ivanhoe. The Company has made the following exemptions to its opening statement of financial
position dated January 1, 2010:
i. Deemed Cost
The Company elected to report oil and gas properties, recorded in PP&E and E&E assets, at a deemed
cost instead of the actual cost as though IFRS had been adopted retroactively. The deemed cost will
be the amounts previously reported under Canadian GAAP.
ii. Decommissioning Provisions Included in the Cost of Property, Plant and Equipment
The exemption provided in IFRS 1 from the full retrospective application of International Financial
Reporting Committee 1 Changes in Existing Decommissioning, Restoration and Similar Liabilities
was applied to decommissioning liabilities associated with our oil and gas properties recorded in
PP&E and intangible assets. The Company elected to re-measure its FTF decommissioning provision
under IFRS.
29
iii. Share-Based Payment
The Company elected to apply the share-based payment exemption and has applied IFRS 2, Share-based
Payments only to those stock options that were issued after November 7, 2002, but that had not
vested by the January 1, 2010 transition date.
iv. Business Combinations
The Company applied the business combinations exemption in IFRS 1 and has not restated business
combinations that took place prior to the January 1, 2010 transition date.
v. Leases
The Company applied the lease exemption in IFRS 1 for contracts and agreements entered into before
January 1, 2010. Where Ivanhoe has, under Canadian GAAP, made the same determination of whether an
arrangement contains a lease as required by IFRIC 4, Determining whether an Arrangement contains a
Lease, but that assessment was made at a date other than that required by IFRIC 4, the Company
elected not to reassess that determination.
23.2 Reconciliations to IFRS
IFRS employs a conceptual framework that is similar to Canadian GAAP. While the adoption of IFRS
has not changed the actual cash flows of the Company, the adoption has resulted in significant
changes to the reported financial position and results of operations of the Company. Presented
below are reconciliations prepared by the Company to reconcile to IFRS the Consolidated Statement
of Financial Position and Consolidated Statement of Loss and Comprehensive Loss of the Company from
those reported under Canadian GAAP.
Changes made to the statements of financial position and statements of loss have resulted in
reclassifications of various amounts on the statements of cash flows. Due to the reclassification
of capitalized overhead under Canadian GAAP to operating costs or general and administrative
(G&A) expenses under IFRS, cash used in investing activities under Canadian GAAP was reclassified
to cash used in operating activities under IFRS. Since there was no change to the total increase
in cash and cash equivalents, no reconciliation for the statements of cash flows was presented.
Certain amounts previously reported under Canadian GAAP have been reclassified to conform with IFRS
presentation standards. Restricted cash was combined with cash and cash equivalents and asset
retirement obligations were combined with other long term provisions. Other name changes have been
made to certain financial statement line items to conform with the IFRS format standards.
30
Reconciliation of Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1, 2010 |
|
|
At December 31, 2010 |
|
|
At March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Canadian |
|
|
Effect of |
|
|
IFRS |
|
|
Canadian |
|
|
Effect of |
|
|
IFRS |
|
|
Canadian |
|
|
Effect of |
|
|
IFRS |
|
(US$000s) |
|
GAAP |
|
|
Transition |
|
|
Balances |
|
|
GAAP |
|
|
Transition |
|
|
Balances |
|
|
GAAP |
|
|
Transition |
|
|
Balances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
24,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,362 |
|
|
|
68,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,317 |
|
|
|
139,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139,235 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
5,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,021 |
|
|
|
6,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,359 |
|
|
|
4,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,802 |
|
Note receivable |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261 |
|
Prepaid and other current assets |
|
|
771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
771 |
|
|
|
2,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,859 |
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,379 |
|
|
|
77,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,799 |
|
|
|
144,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
92,153 |
|
|
|
115,597 |
a |
|
|
207,750 |
|
|
|
92,153 |
|
|
|
197,193 |
a |
|
|
273,568 |
|
|
|
92,153 |
|
|
|
141,043 |
a |
|
|
231,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,482 |
) b |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,391 |
) b |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
c |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(606 |
) g |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,471 |
) g |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
158,392 |
|
|
|
(115,597 |
) a |
|
|
41,983 |
|
|
|
237,200 |
|
|
|
(197,193 |
) a |
|
|
40,618 |
|
|
|
182,219 |
|
|
|
(141,043 |
) a |
|
|
40,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(904 |
) b |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,014 |
) b |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(949 |
) b |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
c |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189 |
c |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
c |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,436 |
f |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
546 |
f |
|
|
|
|
Long term receivables |
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
1,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
281,763 |
|
|
|
(812 |
) |
|
|
280,951 |
|
|
|
409,585 |
|
|
|
(15,167 |
) |
|
|
394,418 |
|
|
|
420,418 |
|
|
|
(2,308 |
) |
|
|
418,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
10,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,779 |
|
|
|
21,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,482 |
|
|
|
11,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,638 |
|
Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,023 |
d |
|
|
13,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,447 |
d |
|
|
8,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,076 |
d |
|
|
29,076 |
|
Income tax payable |
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
Decommissioning costs |
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,062 |
|
|
|
13,023 |
|
|
|
25,085 |
|
|
|
61,314 |
|
|
|
8,447 |
|
|
|
69,761 |
|
|
|
12,148 |
|
|
|
29,076 |
|
|
|
41,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term debt |
|
|
36,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,449 |
|
Long term provisions |
|
|
2,095 |
|
|
|
92 |
c |
|
|
2,187 |
|
|
|
2,644 |
|
|
|
364 |
c |
|
|
3,008 |
|
|
|
2,249 |
|
|
|
92 |
c |
|
|
2,341 |
|
Deferred income tax liability |
|
|
22,643 |
|
|
|
(307 |
) b |
|
|
22,336 |
|
|
|
21,518 |
|
|
|
(367 |
) b |
|
|
21,165 |
|
|
|
22,817 |
|
|
|
(313 |
) b |
|
|
22,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
f |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
f |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,734 |
|
|
|
12,808 |
|
|
|
86,542 |
|
|
|
85,476 |
|
|
|
8,458 |
|
|
|
93,934 |
|
|
|
75,663 |
|
|
|
28,859 |
|
|
|
104,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital |
|
|
422,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
422,322 |
|
|
|
550,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550,562 |
|
|
|
549,075 |
|
|
|
(105 |
) e |
|
|
548,970 |
|
Purchase warrants |
|
|
19,427 |
|
|
|
(19,427 |
) d |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,423 |
|
|
|
(33,423 |
) d |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,423 |
|
|
|
(33,423 |
) d |
|
|
|
|
Contributed surplus |
|
|
20,029 |
|
|
|
(2,947 |
) d |
|
|
18,724 |
|
|
|
22,983 |
|
|
|
(2,947 |
) d |
|
|
23,141 |
|
|
|
18,573 |
|
|
|
(2,947 |
) d |
|
|
18,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,642 |
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,105 |
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,433 |
e |
|
|
|
|
Convertible note |
|
|
2,086 |
|
|
|
(2,086 |
) d |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,086 |
|
|
|
(2,086 |
) d |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,086 |
|
|
|
(2,086 |
) d |
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(255,835 |
) |
|
|
9,198 |
|
|
|
(246,637 |
) |
|
|
(284,945 |
) |
|
|
11,726 |
|
|
|
(273,219 |
) |
|
|
(258,402 |
) |
|
|
4,961 |
|
|
|
(253,441 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208,029 |
|
|
|
(13,620 |
) |
|
|
194,409 |
|
|
|
324,109 |
|
|
|
(23,625 |
) |
|
|
300,484 |
|
|
|
344,755 |
|
|
|
(31,167 |
) |
|
|
313,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
281,763 |
|
|
|
(812 |
) |
|
|
280,951 |
|
|
|
409,585 |
|
|
|
(15,167 |
) |
|
|
394,418 |
|
|
|
420,418 |
|
|
|
(2,308 |
) |
|
|
418,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
Reconciliation of Consolidated Statements of Loss and Comprehensive Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Canadian |
|
|
Effect of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian |
|
|
Effect of |
|
|
|
|
(US$000s) |
|
GAAP |
|
|
Transition |
|
|
IFRS |
|
|
GAAP |
|
|
Transition |
|
|
IFRS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil |
|
|
21,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,720 |
|
|
|
5,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,330 |
|
Interest |
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,928 |
|
|
|
5,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
13,514 |
|
|
|
111 |
b |
|
|
13,625 |
|
|
|
3,423 |
|
|
|
31 |
b |
|
|
3,454 |
|
Exploration and evaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,471 |
g |
|
|
8,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
606 |
g |
|
|
606 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
32,864 |
|
|
|
8,481 |
b |
|
|
42,807 |
|
|
|
6,340 |
|
|
|
1,406 |
b |
|
|
8,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,462 |
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
686 |
e |
|
|
|
|
Depletion and depreciation |
|
|
8,960 |
|
|
|
(2,436 |
) f |
|
|
6,524 |
|
|
|
2,083 |
|
|
|
(546 |
) f |
|
|
1,537 |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
|
(3,325 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,325 |
) |
|
|
(4,187 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,187 |
) |
(Gain) loss on derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,571 |
) d |
|
|
(18,571 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,057 |
d |
|
|
2,057 |
|
Interest |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,037 |
|
|
|
(2,482 |
) |
|
|
49,555 |
|
|
|
7,663 |
|
|
|
4,240 |
|
|
|
11,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(30,109 |
) |
|
|
2,482 |
|
|
|
(27,627 |
) |
|
|
(2,314 |
) |
|
|
(4,240 |
) |
|
|
(6,554 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Provision for) recovery of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
Deferred |
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
|
60 |
b |
|
|
1,171 |
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
6 |
b |
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14 |
) f |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) f |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
1,045 |
|
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(251 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss and comprehensive loss |
|
|
(29,110 |
) |
|
|
2,528 |
|
|
|
(26,582 |
) |
|
|
(2,567 |
) |
|
|
(4,238 |
) |
|
|
(6,805 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to reconciliation
a. |
|
Reclassification of Intangible Assets |
|
|
|
Under Canadian GAAP, oil and gas properties in the exploration and evaluation stage were
classified as oil and gas properties and development costs. In accordance with IFRS 6, these
properties were reclassified as intangible assets. |
|
b. |
|
Adjustment for Capitalized Overhead |
|
|
|
Under Canadian GAAP, the Company capitalized employee benefits and overhead that were directly
attributable to E&E assets and PP&E. A portion of the amounts capitalized under Canadian GAAP do
not meet the threshold for capitalization under IAS 16, Property, Plant and Equipment and
therefore have been reclassified as operating costs or general and administrative expenses, as
appropriate. |
|
c. |
|
Decommissioning Provisions |
|
|
|
Under Canadian GAAP, the present value of the Companys estimated future decommissioning costs
was calculated using a credit-adjusted risk-free discount rate. The discount rate under IFRS
does not permit company specific credit adjustments and therefore the decommissioning provision
has been recalculated using a risk-free discount rate. |
|
d. |
|
Derivative Financial Instruments |
|
|
|
Under Canadian GAAP, the equity component of the Companys Convertible Note and the purchase
warrants were classified as shareholders equity. In accordance with IAS 32, Financial
Instruments: Presentation, financial instruments with an exercise price denominated in a
currency other than the Companys functional currency are accounted for as derivatives. As a
result, the equity component and purchase warrants have been reclassified as derivative
financial instruments. |
|
|
|
This resulted in the reclassification of the convertible portion of the Convertible Note and
purchase from shareholders equity to liabilities under IFRS. Additionally, IFRS requires these
items to be recorded at fair value with changes in their fair value recognized in the income
statement. |
32
e. |
|
Share-Based Payments |
|
|
|
Stock options were accounted for using the fair value method under Canadian GAAP and charged to
operations on a straight-line basis. Under IFRS 2, Share-Based Payment, share-based payments
are charged to operations on a graded vesting basis thereby accelerating the compensation
expense recognized in earnings. Additional compensation expense was recorded for unvested stock
options at January 1, 2010. |
|
f. |
|
Depletion |
|
|
|
Under Canadian GAAP, the Company depleted its oil and gas assets using the unit-of-production
method, based on proved reserves. For IFRS purposes, the Company is depleting its oil and gas
assets using the unit-of-production method, based on proved plus probable reserves. This has
resulted in a deferral of depletion expense. |
|
g. |
|
Exploration and Evaluation Expense |
|
|
|
Under Canadian GAAP, capitalization of unsuccessful exploration activities was permitted if the
carrying value of the Companys total capitalized oil and gas properties and development was not
impaired. Under IFRS, unsuccessful exploration and evaluation wells will be charged to earnings
as E&E expense, including $4.9 million in Ecuador and $3.5 million in Asia in the year ended
December 31, 2010. |
33
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS |
Forward-Looking Statements
With the exception of historical information, certain matters discussed in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q (Form 10-Q), including those within this Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A), are forward-looking statements that
involve risks and uncertainties. Certain statements contained in this Form 10-Q, including
statements which may contain words such as anticipate, could, propose, should, intend,
seeks to, is pursuing, expect, believe, will and similar expressions may be indicative of
forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes that its expectations are based on
reasonable assumptions, forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and
uncertainties that may cause the actual future results, performances or achievements to be
materially different from managements current expectations. These known and unknown risks and
uncertainties may include, but are not limited to, the ability to raise capital as and when
required, the timing and extent of changes in prices for oil and gas, competition, environmental
risks, drilling and operating risks, uncertainties about the estimates of reserves and the
potential success of the Companys heavy-to-light technology, the prices of goods and services, the
availability of drilling rigs and other support services, legislative and government regulations,
political and economic factors in countries in which the Company operates and implementation of its
capital investment program. Except as required by law, the Company undertakes no obligation to
update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements contained in this report. All subsequent
forward-looking statements, whether written or oral, attributable to the Company, or persons acting
on the Companys behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements.
The above items and their possible impact are discussed more fully in the sections entitled Risk
Factors in Item 1A and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk in Item 7A of
the Companys 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K (2010 Form 10-K).
Special Note to Canadian Investors
The Company is a registrant under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and voluntarily files reports
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and other
forms used by registrants that are US domestic issuers. Therefore, the Companys reserves estimates
and securities regulatory disclosures generally follow SEC requirements. National Instrument 51-101
Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities (NI 51-101), adopted by the Canadian
Securities Administrators (CSA), prescribes certain standards for the preparation, and disclosure
of reserves and related information by Canadian issuers. The Company has been granted certain
exemptions from NI 51-101. Please refer to the Special Note to Canadian Investors in the 2010 Form
10-K.
Advisories
The Form 10-Q report should be read in conjunction with the Companys March 31, 2011 unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements (the Financial Statements) contained herein, and the
audited consolidated financial statements and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations contained in the 2010 Form 10-K. The Financial Statements have
been prepared using accounting policies consistent with IFRS and in accordance with International
Accounting Standard 34, Interim Financial Reporting (IAS 34). A reconciliation of the previously
disclosed comparative periods financial statements, prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP, to
IFRS is set out in Note 23 to the Financial Statements.
As a foreign private issuer in the US, Ivanhoe is permitted to file with the SEC financial
statements prepared under IFRS without a reconciliation to US GAAP. The Company will no longer
prepare a reconciliation of its results to US GAAP. It is possible that some of the Companys
accounting policies under IFRS could be different from US GAAP.
Non-IFRS Financial Measures
Oil revenue per barrel is calculated by dividing oil revenue by the Companys total production for
the respective periods presented. Net operating revenue per barrel is calculated by dividing oil
revenue less related operating costs by total production for the respective periods presented. Net
revenue (loss) from operations per barrel is calculated by subtracting depletion from net operating
revenue and dividing by total production for the respective periods presented. The Company
believes oil revenue per barrel, net operating revenue per barrel and net revenue (loss) from
operations per barrel are important to investors to evaluate operating results and the Companys
ability to generate cash. Each of the components used in these calculations can be reconciled
directly to the unaudited interim condensed consolidated statements of loss. The calculations of
oil revenue per barrel, net operating revenue per barrel and net revenue (loss) from operations per
barrel may differ from similar calculations of other companies in the oil and gas industry, thereby
limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure.
34
THE DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF THE COMPANYS OIL AND GAS ACTIVITIES, WITH RESPECT TO OIL AND GAS
VOLUMES, RESERVES AND RELATED PERFORMANCE MEASURES, PRESENT THE COMPANYS NET WORKING INTEREST
AFTER ROYALTIES. ALL TABULAR AMOUNTS ARE EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF US DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AND
PRODUCTION DATA INCLUDING REVENUES AND COSTS PER BOE.
As generally used in the oil and gas business and throughout this Form 10-Q, the following terms
have the following meanings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bbl
|
|
=
|
|
barrel
|
|
mcf
|
|
=
|
|
thousand cubic feet |
bbls/d
|
|
=
|
|
barrels per day
|
|
mcf/d
|
|
=
|
|
thousand cubic feet per day |
boe
|
|
=
|
|
barrel of oil equivalent
|
|
mmcf
|
|
=
|
|
million cubic feet |
boe/d
|
|
=
|
|
barrels of oil equivalent per day
|
|
mmcf/d
|
|
=
|
|
million cubic feet per day |
mbbls
|
|
=
|
|
thousand barrels
|
|
mmbbls
|
|
=
|
|
million barrels |
mbbls/d
|
|
=
|
|
thousand barrels per day
|
|
mmbls/d
|
|
=
|
|
million barrels per day |
mboe
|
|
=
|
|
thousands of barrels of oil equivalent
|
|
mmbtu
|
|
=
|
|
million British thermal units |
mboe/d
|
|
=
|
|
thousands of barrels of oil equivalent per day
|
|
tcf
|
|
=
|
|
trillion cubic feet |
Oil equivalents compare quantities of oil with quantities of gas or express these different
commodities in a common unit. In calculating barrel of oil equivalents (boe), the generally
recognized industry standard is one bbl is equal to six mcf. Boes may be misleading, particularly
if used in isolation. The conversion ratio is based on an energy equivalent conversion method
primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead.
Electronic copies of the Companys filings with the SEC and the CSA are available, free of charge,
through the Companys website (www.ivanhoeenergy.com) or, upon request, by contacting its
investor relations department at (403) 261-1700. Alternatively, the SEC and the CSA each maintains
a website (www.sec.gov and www.sedar.com) from which the Companys periodic reports
and other public filings with the SEC and the CSA can be obtained.
35
INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS
Transition to IFRS from Canadian GAAP
The Company adopted International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) on January 1, 2011, with a
transition date of January 1, 2010. The 2010 comparative periods have been restated under IFRS.
IFRS employs a conceptual framework that is similar to Canadian generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP), however, significant differences exist in certain matters of recognition,
measurement and disclosure. The adoption of IFRS resulted in changes to the reported financial
position and earnings of the Company. Reconciliations of the statements of financial position and
statements of loss presented under Canadian GAAP to IFRS is included in
Note 23 to the Financial Statements.
Changes made to the statements of financial position and statements of loss have resulted in
reclassifications of various amounts on the statements of cash flows. Due to the reclassification
of capitalized overhead under Canadian GAAP to operating costs or general and administrative
(G&A) expenses under IFRS, cash used in investing activities under Canadian GAAP was reclassified
to cash used in operating activities under IFRS. Since there was no change to the total increase
in cash and cash equivalents, no reconciliation for the statements of cash flows was presented.
Initial Adoption of IFRS
i. IFRS 1 Exemptions
IFRS 1, First-Time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards, (IFRS 1) provides
companies adopting IFRS for the first time with a number of optional exemptions and mandatory
exceptions to the general requirement for full retrospective application of IFRS where
retrospective restatement would either be onerous or would not provide more useful information. As
a result of relying upon the exemptions described below, there was no material change in these
areas at the date of transition to IFRS in comparison to amounts previously reported under Canadian
GAAP.
a) Deemed Cost
The Company elected to report oil and gas properties recorded in property, plant and equipment
(PP&E) and exploration and evaluation (E&E) assets at deemed cost, instead of the actual cost
as though IFRS had been adopted retroactively. The deemed cost will be the amounts previously
reported under Canadian GAAP.
b) Decommissioning Provisions Included in the Cost of Property, Plant and Equipment
The exemption provided in IFRS 1 from the full retrospective application of IFRIC 1 Changes in
Existing Decommissioning, Restoration and Similar Liabilities was applied to decommissioning
liabilities associated with our oil and gas properties recorded in PP&E and intangible assets. The
Company elected to re-measure its feedstock test facility (FTF) decommissioning provision under
IFRS.
c) Share-Based Payment
The Company elected to apply the share-based payment exemption and has applied IFRS 2, Share-based
Payment only to those stock options that were issued after November 7, 2002, but that had not
vested by the January 1, 2010 transition date.
d) Business Combinations
The Company applied the business combinations exemption in IFRS 1 and has not restated business
combinations that took place prior to the January 1, 2010 transition date.
e) Leases
The Company applied the lease exemption in IFRS 1 for contracts and agreements entered into before
January 1, 2010. Where Ivanhoe has, under Canadian GAAP, made the same determination of whether an
arrangement contains a lease as required by IFRIC 4, Determining whether an Arrangement contains a
Lease, but that assessment was made at a date other than that required by IFRIC 4, the Company
elected not to reassess that determination.
36
ii. Impact on Adoption of IFRS on Financial Reporting
The conversion to IFRS will result in differences in recognition, measurement and disclosure of
balances and transactions in the Financial Statements. Certain amounts previously reported under
Canadian GAAP have been reclassified to conform with IFRS presentation standards. Restricted cash
was combined with cash and cash equivalents and the
Companys asset retirement obligations was combined with other long term provisions. Other name
changes have been made to certain financial statement line items to conform with the IFRS format
standards.
The accounting policies and financial statement accounts of the Company that are materially
affected by the adoption of IFRS are discussed below.
a) Reclassification of Intangible Assets
Under Canadian GAAP, oil and gas properties in the exploration and evaluation stage were classified
as oil and gas properties and development costs. In accordance with IFRS 6, these properties were
reclassified as intangible assets. As a result, $197.2 million of assets at December 31, 2010,
were moved from PP&E to intangible assets.
b) Adjustment for Capitalized Overhead
Under Canadian GAAP, the Company capitalized employee benefits and overhead that were directly
attributable to E&E assets and PP&E. A portion of the amounts capitalized under Canadian GAAP does
not meet the threshold for capitalization under IAS 16, Property, Plant and Equipment.
Therefore, for the year ending December 31, 2010, $2.0 million and $7.5 million of costs previously
classified as PP&E and intangible assets, respectively, under Canadian GAAP were reclassified as
operating costs or G&A expenses under IFRS.
c) Decommissioning Provisions
Under Canadian GAAP, the present value of the Companys estimated future decommissioning costs was
calculated using a credit-adjusted risk-free discount rate. The discount rate under IFRS does not
permit company specific credit adjustments and therefore the decommissioning provision is now
calculated using a risk-free discount rate. This has resulted in an increase of $0.4 million to
PP&E and intangible assets with a corresponding increase to long term provisions at December 31,
2010.
d) Derivative Financial Instruments
Under Canadian GAAP, the equity component of the Companys Cdn$40.0 million convertible promissory
note (the Convertible Note) and the purchase warrants were classified as shareholders equity. In
accordance with IAS 32, Financial Instruments: Presentation, financial instruments with an
exercise price denominated in a currency other than the Companys functional currency are accounted
for as derivatives. Consequently, the equity component of the Convertible Note and the purchase
warrants have been reclassified as derivative financial instruments.
At December 31, 2010, this resulted in the reclassification of the $2.1 million equity component of
the Convertible Note and the $33.4 million value of the purchase warrants from shareholders equity
under Canadian GAAP to liabilities under IFRS. Additionally, IFRS requires these items to be
recorded at fair value with changes in their fair value recognized in earnings, creating a $18.6
million gain under IFRS in 2010.
e) Share-Based Payments
Stock options were accounted for using the fair value method under Canadian GAAP and charged to
operations on a straight-line basis. Under IFRS 2, Share-Based Payment, share-based payments will
be charged to operations on a graded vesting basis thereby accelerating the compensation expense
recognized in earnings. Additional compensation expense of $1.5 million was recorded for unvested
stock options in 2010 under IFRS.
f) Depletion
Under Canadian GAAP, the Company depleted its oil and gas assets using the unit-of-production
method, based on proved reserves. For IFRS purposes, the Company is depleting its oil and gas
assets using the unit-of-production method, based on proved plus probable reserves. This resulted
in a $2.4 million reduction in depletion expense in 2010 and a $2.4 million increase in PP&E at
December 31, 2010.
g) Exploration and Evaluation Expense
Under Canadian GAAP, capitalization of unsuccessful exploration activities was permitted if the
carrying value of the Companys total capitalized oil and gas properties and development costs was
not impaired. Under IFRS, unsuccessful exploration and evaluation wells are charged to earnings as
E&E expense, including $4.9 million in Ecuador and $3.5 million in Asia in the year ended December
31, 2010.
37
iii. Impact of IFRS on Financial Reporting in the Future
While the adoption of IFRS will not change the actual cash flows of the Company, the adoption will
continue to impact the reported financial position and earnings of the Company in the future, such
as those outlined below.
a) Intangible Assets
Future expenditures of a capital nature will be recorded as additions to PP&E or intangible assets,
depending upon the project. When sufficient reserves to justify commercial production are
established, the project will be reclassified from intangible assets to PP&E on the statement of
financial position.
b) Adjustment for Capitalized Overhead
The higher threshold for capitalization of directly attributable costs under IFRS will result in
less capitalization of G&A costs under IFRS than under Canadian GAAP and operating or G&A costs
will increase as a result.
c) Derivative Financial Instruments
IFRS requires changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments to be recognized in
operations. If the Company continues to hold derivative financial instruments, this will create
non-cash volatility in future earnings.
e) Share-Based Payments
Since share-based payments are recorded on a graded vesting basis under IFRS, the compensation
expense for any future stock option grants will be recognized in earnings earlier than under
Canadian GAAP.
f) Depletion
Depleting oil and gas assets on a unit-of-production basis using proved plus probable reserves
under IFRS, rather than proved reserves under Canadian GAAP, will reduce the depletion expense
recorded in a particular period. However, the total associated PP&E to be depleted over the life
of a project will remain the same.
g) Exploration and Evaluation Expense
Under IFRS, any unsuccessful exploration activities in the future will be recorded as an E&E
expense, impacting the Companys earnings.
HIGHLIGHTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, ($000, except as stated) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Average daily production (bbls/d) |
|
|
1,007 |
|
|
|
804 |
|
Realized oil prices ($/bbl) |
|
|
89.62 |
|
|
|
73.63 |
|
Oil revenue |
|
|
8,119 |
|
|
|
5,330 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
14,311 |
|
|
|
23,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow used in operating activities |
|
|
(6,508 |
) |
|
|
(5,431 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
(11,126 |
) |
|
|
(6,805 |
) |
Net loss per share, basic and diluted |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
Oil production increased in the first quarter of 2011 as Ivanhoe received additional volumes
to offset capital expenditures incurred at Dagang. Additional production in combination with
stronger realized prices, resulted in higher oil revenue for the Company in the current quarter.
The net loss in the first quarter of 2011 was $11.1 million, compared to a loss of $6.8 million in
the prior period, due to higher operating and general administrative expenses, which were partially
offset by non-cash foreign currency exchange and derivative instrument gains.
Capital expenditures totaled $14.3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011. At the
Companys Zitong Block in Chinas Sichuan Province, testing operations were performed on the Xu-4
and Xu-5 formations of the Zitong-1 gas well. The Yixin-2 gas well was tested in the Xu-4 formation
and the well was prepared for fracture stimulation. At Dagang, one well was drilled and completed
and a well spudded in 2010 was completed. The fracture stimulation program at Dagang also
continued during the quarter.
In Canada, discussions with the provincial regulatory authorities continued, as well as
consultations with key stakeholders, in connection with the Companys Environmental Impact
Assessment for the Tamarack Project. In Ecuador, preparations
were undertaken for a seismic program designed to increase our understanding of the geological
faulting in the area and to help determine locations for our next appraisal wells.
38
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Asia (net bbls) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dagang |
|
|
86,865 |
|
|
|
67,794 |
|
Daqing |
|
|
3,734 |
|
|
|
4,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total production |
|
|
90,599 |
|
|
|
72,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average daily production (bbls/d) |
|
|
1,007 |
|
|
|
804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pricing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average realized oil price ($/bbl) |
|
|
89.62 |
|
|
|
73.63 |
|
West Texas Intermediate (WTI) ($/bbl) |
|
|
93.92 |
|
|
|
78.71 |
|
Oil Revenue
Ivanhoes oil revenue in the three months ended March 31, 2011, increased from the prior period due
to a combination of higher production volumes and stronger realized prices. Oil production from the
Dagang field in China was relatively constant. However, the terms of the Companys production
sharing contract at Dagang with China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) stipulate that
capital expenditures are to be funded 100% by Ivanhoe and CNPCs portion of the costs are
reimbursed through the receipt of additional oil sales. Due to increased capital activity at Dagang
in the first quarter of 2011, additional oil production was allocated to Ivanhoe.
Net Revenue from Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, ($/bbl) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Oil revenue(1) |
|
|
89.62 |
|
|
|
73.63 |
|
Less operating costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Field operating |
|
|
(17.92 |
) |
|
|
(18.45 |
) |
Windfall Levy |
|
|
(17.39 |
) |
|
|
(11.20 |
) |
Engineering and support costs |
|
|
(1.21 |
) |
|
|
(1.77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenue(1) |
|
|
53.10 |
|
|
|
42.21 |
|
Depletion |
|
|
(17.42 |
) |
|
|
(23.70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue (loss) from operations(1) |
|
|
35.68 |
|
|
|
18.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Oil revenue per barrel, net operating revenue per barrel and net revenue (loss) from
operations per barrel do not have standardized meanings prescribed by IFRS and therefore may
not be comparable to similar measures used by other companies. Please refer to the Non-IFRS
Financial Measures under the Advisories section in the MD&A for more details. |
Operating Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Asia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Field operating |
|
|
1,623 |
|
|
|
1,297 |
|
Windfall levy |
|
|
1,577 |
|
|
|
811 |
|
Engineering support |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,310 |
|
|
|
2,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology Development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FTF operating costs |
|
|
1,213 |
|
|
|
1,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs |
|
|
4,523 |
|
|
|
3,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs in China rose $1.0 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011 over the
comparable period primarily due to an increase in the Windfall Levy administered by the Peoples
Republic of China. Field operating costs in total increased over the prior period due to additional
production volumes. However, on a per barrel basis, field operating costs decreased slightly due to
a reduction in maintenance and power expenses as a result of installing variable frequency drives
at Dagang in the fourth quarter of 2010.
39
Operating costs in the Technology Development segment are incurred at the Companys FTF at the
Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio, Texas. Costs in the three months ended March 31,
2011, were consistent with the first quarter of 2010.
Exploration and Evaluation
E&E expenses were nil in the three months ended March 31, 2011. Following the drilling of the
Zitong-1 and Yixin-2 wells, areas excluding those identified for development and future production
were to be relinquished at the end of 2010. As a result, $0.6 million of geological costs incurred
in prior periods were expensed as E&E costs in the first quarter of 2010.
General and Administrative
G&A expenses were higher in the three months ended March 31, 2011, in comparison to the prior year
as a result of higher staff and office costs incurred with the Companys growing commitments to its
projects around the world.
Depletion and Depreciation
Depletion and depreciation in the three months ended March 31, 2011 increased compared to 2010.
Depreciation of the FTF was higher in the current quarter compared to 2010, as revisions to FTF
salvage values lowered depreciation in the first quarter of 2010. This was partially offset by
lower depletion in Asia in the current quarter as a result of additional Dagang proved and probable
reserves at January 1, 2011.
Foreign Exchange
Ivanhoe incurred a smaller foreign exchange gain in the first three months of 2011 compared to the
prior period. At March 31, 2010, a foreign exchange gain was created primarily by the translation
of the Companys Canadian dollar cash balance into US dollars. Although the Canadian dollar has
continued to strengthen in comparison to the US dollar, Ivanhoes cash balance was lower at March
31, 2011, and the foreign exchange gain in the current quarter was largely offset by foreign
exchange losses on the Companys Canadian dollar debt and accounts payable balances.
Derivative Instruments
In the first three months of 2011, the Company incurred a gain of $1.1 million on its derivative
liabilities. The revaluation of the Companys purchase warrants resulted in a net gain of $0.3
million and the expiry of purchase warrants during the quarter created a gain of $1.5 million.
Due to the impending maturity of the Convertible Note, a gain of $0.5 was recognized on the
revaluation of the convertible portion at March 31, 2011.
In January 2010, one of the Companys subsidiaries granted a private investor an option (the
Subsidiary Option) to acquire an equity interest in the subsidiary representing 20% of the
subsidiarys currently issued share capital (16.67% of the enlarged share capital immediately
following the exercise of the Subsidiary Option) for Cdn$25.0 million. If the Subsidiary Option is
exercised, Cdn$25 million of existing inter-corporate indebtedness owed by the subsidiary to the
Company (through an intermediate subsidiary) will be converted into additional common shares of the
subsidiary, thereby diluting the private investors equity interest to 14.286%. The fair value of
the Subsidiary Option, calculated using the Black Scholes option pricing model, used an estimated
share value and assumed the volatility to be similar to Ivanhoe. The revaluation of the Subsidiary
Option created a non-realized loss of $1.2 million in the first quarter of 2011.
Provision for Income Taxes
During the first quarter of 2011, current taxes of $0.3 million were incurred in China. Ivanhoe
incurred a future tax expense of $0.6 million due to increases in the deferred tax liability in
China, net of operating loss carryforwards, which was partially offset by continuing operating loss
carryforwards in the US.
40
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Contractual Obligations
The following information about our contractual obligations and other commitments summarizes
certain liquidity and capital resource requirements. The information presented in the table below
does not include planned, but not legally committed, capital expenditures or obligations that are
discretionary and/or being performed under contracts which can be terminated on 30 days notice.
Previous exploration commitments in Zitong and Nyalga have been fulfilled and therefore are not
included below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
After 2014 |
|
Debt |
|
|
41,256 |
|
|
|
41,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
1,029 |
|
|
|
1,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decommissioning provisions(1) |
|
|
2,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,665 |
|
Long term obligation |
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
Lease commitments |
|
|
2,525 |
|
|
|
1,372 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,717 |
|
|
|
43,657 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents undiscounted asset retirement obligations after inflation. The discounted value of
these estimated obligations is provided for in the Financial Statements. |
Debt
As described in Note 8 to the Financial Statements, the Company issued a Cdn$40.0 million
Convertible Note maturing in July 2011. The outstanding principal amount is convertible, at
Talismans option, into a maximum of 12,779,552 Ivanhoe common shares at Cdn$3.13 per common share.
Interest at the prime rate plus 2% is calculated daily and payable semi-annually. The estimated
interest payments on the Convertible Note are included in the above table.
Decommissioning Provisions
The Company is required to remedy the effect of our activities on the environment at our operating
sites by dismantling and removing production facilities and remediating any damage caused. At March
31, 2011, we estimated the total undiscounted, inflated cost to settle our asset retirement
obligations in Canada, for the FTF and in Ecuador was $2.0 million. These costs are expected to be
incurred in 2013, 2029 and 2038 respectively. Ivanhoe does not make such a provision for
decommissioning costs in connection with its oil and gas operations in China as dry holes are
abandoned as they occur and the Company is under no obligation to contribute to the future costs to
restore well sites or abandon the field.
Long Term Obligation
As part of its 2005 merger with Ensyn, the Company assumed an obligation to pay $1.9 million in the
event that proceeds from the sale of units incorporating the HTL technology for petroleum
applications reach a total of $100.0 million.
Operating Leases
We have long term operating leases for office space, which expire between 2011 and 2013.
Other
The Company may be required to make a payment of up to Cdn$15 million if, and when, the requisite
governmental and other approvals are received to develop the northern border of one of of the
Tamarack leases.
From time to time, Ivanhoe enters into consulting agreements whereby a success fee may be payable
if and when either a definitive agreement is signed or certain other contractual milestones are
met. Under the agreements, the consultant may receive cash, common shares, stock options or some
combination thereof. These fees are not considered to be material.
The Company may provide indemnities to third parties, in the ordinary course of business, that are
customary in certain commercial transactions, such as purchase and sale agreements. The terms of
these indemnities will vary based upon the contract, the nature of which prevents Ivanhoe from
making a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amounts that may be required to be paid. The
Companys management is of the opinion that any resulting settlements relating to indemnities are
not likely to be material.
41
In the normal course of business, we are subject to legal proceedings being brought against us.
While the final outcome of these proceedings is uncertain, we believe that these proceedings, in
the aggregate, are not reasonably likely to have a material effect on our financial position or
earnings.
Sources and Uses of Cash
The Companys cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities, as reflected in the
unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flow, are summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(6,508 |
) |
|
|
(5,431 |
) |
Cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(11,985 |
) |
|
|
(23,368 |
) |
Cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
29,795 |
|
|
|
137,957 |
|
Ivanhoes cash flow from operating activities is not sufficient to meet its operating and
capital obligations over the next twelve months. The Company intends to use its working capital to
meet its commitments. However, additional sources of funding will be required to grow the Companys
major projects and fully develop its oil and gas properties, either at a parent company level or at
a project level. Historically, Ivanhoe has used external sources of funding such as public and
private equity and debt markets. However, there is no assurance that these sources of funding will
be available to the Company in the future on acceptable terms, or at all.
Operating Activities
In the three months ended March 31, 2011, cash used in operating activities was higher than in 2010
as additional operating costs and G&A expenses were only partially offset by higher revenue in the
current quarter.
Investing Activities
E&E Expenditures
E&E expenditures in the first quarter of 2011 totaled $10.4 million. At the Companys Zitong
Block in Chinas Sichuan Province, testing operations were performed on the Xu-4 and Xu-5
formations of the Zitong-1 gas well. The Yixin-2 gas well was tested in the Xu-4 formation and
the well has been prepared for fracture stimulation. In the Nyalga basin of Mongolia,
preparations for a seismic acquisition program are underway.
In Canada, discussions with the provincial regulatory authorities are ongoing as well as
consultation with key stakeholders in connection with the Companys Environmental Impact
Assessment for the Tamarack Project.
In Ecuador, preparations began for the seismic survey of Block 20. The seismic program is
essential to defining the location and orientation of fault blocks that exist due to the close
proximity of the Andes Mountains, directly west of Block 20.
PP&E Expenditures
In the first three months of 2011, PP&E additions totaled $3.9 million. At Dagang, one well was
drilled and completed and a well spudded in 2010 was completed. The fracture stimulation program
at Dagang also continued during the quarter.
Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities was lower in the three months ended March 31, 2011 than in
the prior period. In the first quarter of 2011, cash proceeds of $29.8 million were raised through
the exercise of purchase warrants and stock options. In the first quarter of 2010, the Company
raised $136.3 million, net of issuance costs, through a private placement of 50 million special
warrants at a price of Cdn$3.00 per special warrant.
42
Capital Structure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
As at |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Debt |
|
|
40,985 |
|
|
|
39,832 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
324,055 |
|
|
|
300,484 |
|
Ivanhoe intends to use its cash and cash equivalent balance to fulfill its commitments and
partially fund operations in 2011. Cash flow may be insufficient to meet operating requirements in
the next twelve months and additional sources of funding, either at a parent company level or at a
project level, will be required to grow the Companys major projects and fully develop its oil and
gas properties. Historically, Ivanhoe has used external sources of funding, such as public and
private equity and debt markets. There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional
financing on favorable terms, if at all, and any future equity issuances may be dilutive to our
current investors. If we cannot secure additional financing, we may have to delay our capital
programs and forfeit or dilute our rights in existing oil and gas property interests.
Outlook for 2011
In the upcoming months, Ivanhoe anticipates completing a fracture stimulation program at the
Zitong-1 and Yixin-2 gas wells in China. Following initial testing, the wells will be available to
be tied-in to the local gas gathering system. The Company is currently drafting a provisional
overall development plan for the Zitong Block and will submit this plan to PetroChina by the end of
June 2011. The plan will provide PetroChina with a conceptual overview of activities proposed to
develop the natural gas opportunities across the Zitong Block.
In Mongolia, activities will continue in preparation for a 2D seismic program and the drilling of
two exploration wells. The Company also plans to commence a seismic program in Ecuador, starting in
the southern portion of Block 20 to increase our understanding of the geological faulting and to
determine locations for future appraisal wells.
Minor expenditures may be necessary for development costs relating to the enhancement of the
Companys HTLTM upgrading process. The Company is continuing to pursue ongoing
discussions related to other HTLTM heavy oil and selected conventional oil opportunities
in North and South America, the Middle East and North Africa.
Managements plans for financing future expenditures include traditional project financing, debt
and mezzanine financing or the sale of equity securities as well as the potential for alliances or
other arrangements with strategic partners. Discussions with potential strategic partners are
focused primarily on national oil companies and other sovereign or government entities from Asian
and Middle Eastern countries that have approached Ivanhoe and expressed interest in participating
in the Companys heavy oil activities in Ecuador, Canada and around the world. However, no
assurances can be given that Ivanhoe will be able to enter into one or more strategic business
alliances with third parties or that the Company will be able to raise sufficient additional
capital. If the Company is unable to enter into such business alliances or obtain adequate
additional financing, the Company may be required to curtail its operations, which may include the
sale of assets.
43
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
The Companys management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of March 31, 2011. Based
upon this evaluation, management concluded that these controls and procedures were (1) designed to
ensure that material information relating to the Company is made known to the Companys Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
disclosure and (2) effective, in that they provide reasonable assurance that information required
to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules
and forms.
It should be noted that while the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
believe that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures provide a reasonable level of
assurance that they are effective, they do not expect that the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures or internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and fraud. A
control system, no matter how well conceived or operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting in the quarter
ended March 31, 2011, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to have a material
effect on the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
The Company is a defendant in a lawsuit filed on November 20, 2008, in the United States District
Court for the District of Colorado by Jack J. Grynberg and three affiliated companies. The suit
alleged bribery and other misconduct and challenged the propriety of a contract awarded to the
Companys wholly-owned subsidiary Ivanhoe Energy Ecuador Inc. to develop Ecuadors Pungarayacu
heavy oil field. The plaintiffs claims were for unspecified damages or ownership of the Companys
interest in the Pungarayacu field. The Company and related defendants filed motions to dismiss the
lawsuit for lack of jurisdiction. The Court granted the motion and dismissed the case without
prejudice. The Court granted Mr. Robert Friedlands request to sanction plaintiffs and plaintiffs
counsel for their conduct related to bringing the suit by awarding Mr. Friedland fees and costs.
The Ivanhoe corporate defendants, including the Company, have been awarded their costs in defending
the suit and have requested an award of attorneys fees.
On October 16, 2009, the plaintiffs filed a motion requesting that the Court vacate its judgment
and allow discovery on jurisdictional issues on the grounds that plaintiffs had discovered new
evidence. On July 15, 2010, the Court denied the plaintiffs motion to vacate the judgment. The
request for attorneys fees remains pending before the Court. On August 13, 2010, the
plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal challenging the district courts judgment and some of its
orders. The appeal is currently pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth
Circuit. Briefing on the appeal is complete; the plaintiffs have filed an opening and reply brief
and the Company and related defendants have filed a response brief. The Court has set oral
arguments on the appeal for May 9, 2011, in Denver, Colorado. The likelihood of loss or gain
resulting from the lawsuit, and the estimated amount of ultimate loss or gain, are not determinable
or reasonably estimable at this time.
On December 30, 2010, the Company
received a demand for arbitration from GAR Energy and Associates, Inc. (GAR Energy) and
Gonzalo A. Ruiz and Janis S. Ruiz as successors in interest to and assignees of GAR Energy.
GAR Energy subsequently abandoned its demand for arbitration and filed suit against the Company in
the Superior court for Kern County, California. The lawsuit alleges breach of contract, fraud and
other misconduct arising from a consulting agreement and various other agreements between GAR
Energy and the Company relating to the Pungarayacu heavy oil field. The Plaintiffs seek actual
damages of $250,000, a portion of the Companys interest in the Pungarayacu field and other
miscellaneous relief. Although the lawsuit was filed March 11, 2011, the Company has yet to
receive service of the complaint, meaning there is no current schedule for the Companys
responsive filing. The likelihood of loss or gain resulting from this dispute, and the estimated
amount of ultimate loss or gain, are not determinable or reasonably estimable at this time.
44
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Warrant Indenture Amendment Agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
Warrant Indenture Amendment Agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
IVANHOE ENERGY INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Gerald D. Schiefelbein
Gerald D. Schiefelbein
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
May 10, 2011 |
|
|
45