e424b3
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration No. 333-132617
PROSPECTUS
Service Corporation International
Offer to Exchange
Registered 7.0% Senior Notes due 2017
for
All Outstanding 7.0% Senior Notes due 2017 issued on
June 15, 2005
($300,000,000 in principal amount outstanding)
We are offering to exchange, upon the terms and subject to the
conditions set forth in this prospectus and the accompanying
letter of transmittal, all of our outstanding 7.0% Senior
Notes due 2017 issued on June 15, 2005 for our registered
7.0% Senior Notes due 2017. In this prospectus, we will
call the original notes the Old Notes and the
registered notes the New Notes. The Old Notes and
New Notes are collectively referred to in this prospectus as the
notes.
The Exchange Offer
|
|
|
|
|
The exchange offer expires at 5:00 p.m., New York
City time, on November 20, 2006, unless extended. |
|
|
|
The exchange offer is not conditioned upon a minimum aggregate
principal amount of Old Notes being tendered. |
|
|
|
All outstanding Old Notes validly tendered and not withdrawn
will be exchanged. |
|
|
|
The exchange offer is not subject to any condition other than
that the exchange offer not violate applicable law or any
applicable interpretation of the staff of the Securities and
Exchange Commission. |
|
|
|
We will not receive any cash proceeds from the exchange offer. |
The New Notes
|
|
|
|
|
The terms of the New Notes to be issued in the exchange offer
are substantially identical to the Old Notes, except that we
have registered the New Notes with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. In addition, the New Notes will not be subject to
certain transfer restrictions. |
|
|
|
Interest on the New Notes will be paid at the rate of
7.0% per annum, semi-annually in arrears on each
June 15 and December 15, beginning December 15,
2006. |
|
|
|
The New Notes will not be listed on any securities exchange or
the Nasdaq Stock Market. |
You should carefully consider the risk factors beginning on
page 13 of this prospectus before participating in the exchange
offer.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
Each broker-dealer that receives New Notes for its own
account pursuant to the exchange offer must acknowledge that it
will deliver a prospectus in connection with any resale of such
New Notes. The letter of transmittal states that by so
acknowledging and by delivering a prospectus, a broker-dealer
will not be deemed to admit that it is an
underwriter within the meaning of the Securities
Act. This prospectus, as it may be amended or supplemented from
time to time, may be used by a broker-dealer in connection with
resales of New Notes received in exchange for
Old Notes where such Old Notes were acquired by such
broker-dealer as a result of market-making activities or other
trading activities. See Plan of Distribution.
The date of this prospectus is October 19, 2006.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
F-1 |
|
Until November 29, 2006, all dealers that effect
transactions in these securities, whether or not participating
in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This
is in addition to the dealers obligation to deliver a
prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their
unused allotments or subscriptions.
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-4 under the
Securities Act to register the notes offered by this prospectus.
This prospectus does not contain all the information included in
the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules
thereto. We strongly encourage you to read carefully the
registration statement and the exhibits and schedules thereto.
You can obtain documents included in the registration statement
through our website at www.sci-corp.com or by requesting
them in writing or by telephone from us at the following
address:
Service Corporation International
1929 Allen Parkway
Houston, Texas 77019
Attention: James M. Shelger, Esq.
Telephone No:
(713) 522-5141
To obtain timely delivery of any requested documents, you
must request the information no later than five business days
before you make your investment decision. Please make any such
requests on or before November 13, 2006. See Where
You Can Find More Information for more information about
these matters.
i
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
The following is a summary of the material information
appearing in other sections of this prospectus. It is not
complete and does not contain all the information that you
should consider before exchanging Old Notes for New Notes. You
should carefully read this prospectus and the registration
statement and the exhibits and schedules thereto to understand
fully the terms of the exchange offer and the New Notes, as well
as the tax and other considerations that may be important to
you. You should pay special attention to the Risk
Factors section beginning on page 13 of this
prospectus, as well as the section entitled Cautionary
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements. You should
rely only on the information contained in this document. We have
not authorized anyone to provide you with information that is
different. This document may only be used where it is legal to
sell these securities. The information in this document may only
be accurate on the date of this document.
On April 2, 2006, Service Corporation International, or
SCI, executed a definitive merger agreement pursuant to which,
subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, it
expects to acquire all outstanding shares of Alderwoods Group,
Inc., or Alderwoods (the acquisition). We refer to
the acquisition and the related transactions, including the
issuance of notes offered in a private placement, the issuance
of additional debt securities in a private placement, the
borrowings under our new senior credit facility, the repayment
of certain existing indebtedness of SCI and Alderwoods, combined
with certain divestitures we expect to make pursuant to a
consent decree we expect to enter into with the Federal Trade
Commission (the FTC) and certain other divestitures
of non-strategic operations (collectively the
divestitures), collectively as the
transactions. The transactions are more fully
described below under The Transactions.
The transactions do not include the exchange offer that is the
subject of this prospectus. Pro forma combined information in
this prospectus gives pro forma effect to the transactions as if
they had occurred on January 1, 2005, for statement of
operations purposes, and June 30, 2006, for balance sheet
purposes. See Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial
Information.
For purposes of the pro forma information in this prospectus,
the assets to be sold pursuant to the divestitures have been
reclassified on the pro forma balance sheet as assets held for
sale, and the results of operations of these assets have been
eliminated from the pro forma statement of operations. No pro
forma adjustments have been made to reflect any anticipated gain
or loss from the divestitures and no adjustment has been made to
reflect any earnings benefit from the reinvestment of any
proceeds from the divestitures or any reduction of debt from the
application of sales proceeds.
For purposes of this prospectus, unless the context otherwise
indicates or as otherwise indicated, the term:
|
|
|
|
|
SCI refers to Service Corporation International
and its subsidiaries prior to the acquisition; |
|
|
|
Alderwoods refers to the Alderwoods Group, Inc.
and its subsidiaries; and |
|
|
|
the Company, us, we,
our, and ours refer to SCI, together
with its subsidiaries, and includes Alderwoods, immediately
after giving pro forma effect to the transactions. |
Our Business
We are North Americas leading provider of deathcare
products and services, with a network of funeral homes and
cemeteries unequalled in geographic scale and reach. We hold
leading positions in each of the U.S. and Canada and, after
giving pro forma effect to the transactions, we estimate that we
represented approximately 14% of the funeral and cemetery
services business in North America based on 2005 industry
revenues, which was approximately five times the share of our
next largest North American competitor. At June 30, 2006,
after giving pro forma effect to the transactions, we owned and
operated 1,438 funeral service locations and 235 cemeteries in
North America, which are geographically diversified across
46 states, eight Canadian provinces, the District of
Columbia and Puerto Rico. In addition, after giving pro forma
effect to the transactions, we owned and operated an insurance
company that supports our funeral operations. On a comparable
store basis, SCI increased North America revenues by 3.4% in
fiscal year 2005 compared to fiscal year 2004. For the six month
period ended June 30, 2006, on a pro
1
forma basis giving effect to the transactions, comparable store
revenues in our North America funeral and cemetery operations
increased by 2.5%, compared to the six month period ended
June 30, 2005.
Our funeral service and cemetery operations consist of funeral
service locations, cemeteries, funeral service/cemetery
combination locations, crematoria and related businesses. We
provide all professional services relating to funerals and
cremations, including the use of funeral facilities and motor
vehicles and preparation and embalming services. Funeral related
merchandise, including caskets, burial vaults, cremation
receptacles, flowers and other ancillary products and services,
is sold at each of our funeral service locations. Our cemeteries
provide cemetery property interment rights, including mausoleum
spaces, lots and lawn crypts, and sell cemetery related
merchandise and services, including stone and bronze memorials,
burial vaults, casket and cremation memorialization products,
merchandise installations and burial openings and closings. We
also sell preneed funeral and cemetery products and services
whereby a customer contractually agrees to the terms of certain
products and services to be provided in the future. Finally,
Alderwoods insurance subsidiary sells a variety of
insurance products, primarily for the funding of preneed
funerals sold by Alderwoods funeral locations.
Our funeral and cemetery operations are organized into a North
America division covering the United States and Canada and
an Other Foreign division. Upon completion of the acquisition,
our operations in the North America division are expected to be
organized into approximately 31 major regions and 42 middle
regions (including four Hispana regions). Within each region,
the funeral homes and cemeteries share common resources such as
personnel, preparation services and vehicles. Our four regional
support centers in North America are located in Houston, Miami,
New York and Los Angeles and help to facilitate the execution of
corporate strategies, coordinate communication between the field
and corporate offices, and serve as liaisons for the
implementation of policies and procedures.
Our Other Foreign division includes funeral operations in
Germany and Singapore. We currently intend to sell these
operations when economic values and conditions are conducive to
a sale. We also have a 25% minority interest in certain funeral
operations in France.
Our Competitive Strengths
Industry leader. We believe that our estimated 14% North
America share, on a pro forma basis giving effect to the
transactions, based on 2005 industry revenues, is approximately
five times that of our next largest North American
competitor and approximately two times that of the estimated 6%
combined share of the remaining five publicly traded deathcare
companies. We believe that our size provides us the benefits of
standardized training, industry best practices and efficiencies
of scale.
Geographic reach. After giving pro forma effect to the
transactions, our combined network allows us to serve a broad
population base with more than 1,900 funeral and cemetery
locations diversified over 46 states, eight Canadian
provinces, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. We believe
our scale differentiates us from our competition by allowing us
to implement a national brand strategy and to pursue strategic
affinity partnerships with national groups that can influence
their members choice of deathcare provider. For example,
our strategic affinity partnerships today include the Veterans
of Foreign Wars and Ladies Auxiliary, whose combined membership
exceeds two million. We believe that our extensive national
network enhances purchasing scale and provides us with an
advantage in selling preneed funeral and cemetery products and
services by allowing us to offer our customers the ability to
transfer their preneed contracts to any of the providers in our
network.
National brand. In 2000, SCI introduced the first
coast-to-coast funeral
service brand in North America, Dignity
Memorial®.
We believe that a national brand name is increasingly important
as North American consumers continue to become more
geographically mobile. We believe that consumers are less likely
now than they have been historically to live in the same
community as their parents and grandparents or to know a local
funeral director. By building favorable associations with the
Dignity
Memorial®
brand through funeral services, advertising and
community outreach programs we strive to create an
image of consistency, dependability and excellence that makes
consumers more likely to choose our providers. We expect the
acquisition of Alderwoods to provide additional opportunities
for us to expand
2
the Dignity
Memorial®
brand. In addition, we are currently developing a second brand,
Funeraria del
Angeltm,
to serve North Americas growing Hispanic population. As of
June 30, 2006, Funeraria del
Angeltm
had 23 locations in California, Texas, Illinois and Kansas.
Innovative offerings. Using our Dignity
Memorial®
brand, we augment our range of traditional products and services
with more contemporary and comprehensive offerings. In addition
to a wide range of funeral, memorial, burial and cremation
options, we offer assistance with many of the legal and
administrative details that burden customers at times of loss.
We also offer grief counseling for survivors and a bereavement
travel program, which obtains special rates on airfare, car
rentals and hotel accommodations for family and friends
traveling from out of town to attend services, and an internet
memorialization. In addition, we offer packaged plans for
funerals and cremations that are designed to simplify customer
decision-making. Since our packaged plans were introduced in
2004, they have achieved consistently high customer satisfaction
ratings.
Reputation and service excellence. We believe that we
have established a strong reputation for consistency and service
excellence, which sets us apart from many of our competitors,
serves as a key advantage to attracting customers and enhances
our standing as an employer of choice within the industry.
Continuing our commitment to excellence, in 2004 we established
Dignity
Universitytm,
a virtual school for SCI employees at all levels. It offers a
comprehensive curriculum of professional development and ethics
training that is designed to help employees upgrade skills,
advance their careers and implement ethical standards at every
level of performance. We believe that the acquisition of
Alderwoods will allow us to expand and build our reputation for
service excellence.
Our Strategies for Growth
In recent years, we have strengthened our balance sheet, lowered
our cost structure, introduced more efficient systems and
processes and strengthened our management team. We believe these
improvements, together with the acquisition of Alderwoods,
present us with significant opportunities to achieve future
growth. Our principal strategies are as follows:
Approach the business by customer preference. We believe
customer attitudes and preferences are essential to our
business. We are replacing the industrys traditional
one-size-fits-all approach with a flexible operating and
marketing strategy that categorizes customers according to
personal needs and preferences. Using this new approach, we will
tailor our product and service offerings based on four variables:
|
|
|
|
|
convenience and location, |
|
|
|
religious and ethnic customs, |
|
|
|
quality and prestige, and |
|
|
|
price. |
By identifying customers based on these variables, we can focus
our resources on the most profitable customer categories and
improve our marketing effectiveness. We will continue to refine
our pricing, product and marketing strategies to support this
approach.
Consistent with this strategy, we have begun to analyze existing
business relationships to determine whether they are consistent
with our strategic goals. As a result, SCI made certain local
business decisions to exit unprofitable business relationships
and activities in late 2005 and early 2006. We continue to
analyze our operations and may exit certain business
relationships or activities that do not fit our customer
segmentation strategy.
Realign pricing to reflect current market environment.
SCI, Alderwoods and other competitors in the deathcare industry
have historically generated most of their profits from the sale
of traditional products (including caskets, vaults and markers),
while placing less emphasis on the services involved in funeral
and burial preparation. However, because of increased customer
preference for comprehensive and
3
personalized deathcare services, as well as increased
competition from retail outlets and websites for the sale of
traditional products, SCI has realigned its pricing strategy
from product to service offerings in order to focus on services
that are most valued by customers. SCIs initial results
from the realignment strategy have been favorable based on
increases in the overall average revenue per funeral service
performed. Upon completion of the acquisition, we expect to
evaluate Alderwoods pricing, and, if necessary, make
adjustments to align the pricing strategy at the Alderwoods
locations to the current SCI locations.
Drive operating discipline and take advantage of our
scale. Although we have already made substantial
improvements in our infrastructure, we believe we can continue
to achieve operating improvements through centralization and
standardization of processes for staffing, central care, fleet
management and cemetery maintenance. The acquisition of
Alderwoods provides further opportunities for synergies and
operating efficiencies, which will allow us to utilize our scale
and increase profitability. We are developing clear, yet
flexible, operating standards that will be used as benchmarks
for productivity in these areas. In conjunction with these
standards, we will develop and track shared best practices to
support higher productivity. We also intend to continue to
capitalize on our nationwide network of properties by pursuing
strategic affinity partnerships. Over the longer term, we
believe these relationships can be a key influence in the
funeral home selection process.
Manage and grow the footprint. We will manage our network
of business locations by positioning each business location to
support the preferences of its local customer base while
monitoring each region for changing demographics and competitive
dynamics. Funeral home expansion efforts will primarily target
businesses whose customers value quality and prestige or adhere
to specific religious or ethnic customs. We will focus cemetery
expansion efforts on large cemeteries that are or may be
combined with funeral home operations, which allow facility,
personnel and equipment costs to be shared between the funeral
services location and cemetery.
Industry Overview
Demographic factors. More than 70% of all deaths in the
United States occur at age 65 and older. In 2004 people
aged 65 and older constituted 12% of the population, according
to the U.S. Census Bureau; the U.S. Census Bureau
projects that by 2020 the number of Americans aged 65 and older
will exceed 16% of the population. We believe these demographic
trends will produce a growing demand for our services.
Nevertheless, the number of annual deaths in North America is
expected to remain relatively constant for at least another
decade because of healthier lifestyles and improved medical
care. In 2003 life expectancy in the United States reached
77.6 years, compared with 74.6 years in 1983,
according to the National Center for Health Statistics.
Therefore, our near-term strategies do not anticipate any
increase in the number of deaths. Rather, they are designed to
increase volume and profitability at existing businesses.
Competitive dynamics. The deathcare industry is
characterized by a large number of locally-owned, independent
operations. We believe there are approximately 22,000 funeral
homes and 10,500 cemeteries in the United States. After the
acquisition, the two largest public operators in the deathcare
industry in the United States, based on total revenue and number
of locations, will be us and Stewart Enterprises, Inc. After
giving pro forma effect to the transactions, we believe that we
and Stewart collectively represented approximately 17% of
industry revenues in the United States in 2005.
The trend toward cremation. In the deathcare industry,
there has been a growing trend in the number of cremations
performed in North America as an alternative to traditional
funeral service dispositions. We believe this presents a
significant opportunity for our Company, especially since
research shows that most people who choose cremation do so for
reasons unrelated to cost. We have been a leading provider of
cremation services in North America, with cremation representing
approximately 37%, 38% and 39% of our combined funeral services
in 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively, after giving pro forma
effect to the transactions. While cremation has traditionally
resulted in lower gross profits because it reduces casket sales
and because many customers who choose cremation may also decide
against purchasing cemetery
4
property, we believe we can improve revenue and profit trends
associated with cremation services by realigning our pricing
model and offering better and more personalized products and
services.
For a further description of our business, see the information
set forth under the caption Business that begins on
page 110 of this prospectus.
SCI was incorporated in Texas in July of 1962. Our principal
corporate offices are located at 1929 Allen Parkway,
Houston, Texas 77019 and our telephone number is
(713) 522-5141.
Our website is www.sci-corp.com.
The Transactions
As used in this prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
the acquisition refers to SCIs acquisition of
Alderwoods; |
|
|
|
the financing refers, collectively, to the issuance
of notes in a private placement, the issuance of additional debt
securities in a private placement, the borrowings under a new
senior credit facility, the repurchase of certain outstanding
notes of Alderwoods and SCI pursuant to tender offers, and the
repayment of certain other existing debt of Alderwoods; |
|
|
|
the divestitures refers, collectively, to certain
divestitures we expect to make pursuant to a consent decree we
expect to enter into with the FTC and certain other divestitures
of non-strategic operations; and |
|
|
|
the transactions refers, collectively, to the
acquisition, the financing and the divestitures. |
The Acquisition
On April 2, 2006, SCI entered into a definitive merger
agreement pursuant to which, subject to the terms and conditions
set forth therein, it expects to acquire Alderwoods for
$20.00 per share in cash, resulting in a total purchase
price of approximately $1.2 billion, which includes the
refinancing of approximately $351.7 million and the
assumption of $6.5 million of Alderwoods debt.
Acquisition rationale. The acquisition of Alderwoods will
enable SCI to serve a number of new, complementary areas, while
providing the opportunity for significant synergies and
operating efficiencies. The significant benefits of the
acquisition include:
|
|
|
|
|
increased geographic scope and scale; |
|
|
|
|
|
entry into attractive new geographic areas; |
|
|
|
key new facilities, including Rose Hills, a premier
U.S. deathcare facility; |
|
|
|
|
|
identified annual pre-tax cost savings of approximately $60 to
$70 million expected to be achieved within eighteen months of
closing the acquisition, with approximately $15 million of such
savings realized within twelve months of closing, and potential
additional cost-saving synergies (there can be no assurance that
any such cost savings or synergies will be achieved; see
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Expected Cost
Savings Resulting from the Alderwoods Acquisition); |
|
|
|
immediately accretive to operating cash flow, excluding
implementation costs; |
|
|
|
strong cash flow generation and planned divestitures reduce
financial risk; and |
|
|
|
increased preneed backlog enhances long-term revenue stability. |
5
The Financing
The following financing transactions will occur in connection
with the closing of the acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
borrowings under a new $450 million senior credit facility,
consisting of a $150 million
3-year term loan, all
of which will be borrowed in connection with the transactions,
and a $300 million 5-year revolving credit facility, none
of which is expected to be drawn in connection with the
transactions based on expected cash balances at closing; |
|
|
|
the issuance of $200 million of debt securities in a
private placement; and |
|
|
|
the issuance of $500 million of notes in a private
placement. |
Pending the consummation of the acquisition and certain related
transactions described in this prospectus, the net proceeds of
each series of notes privately placed will be held in separate
escrow accounts. Such notes are subject to special mandatory
redemption in the event that the acquisition and related
transactions described in this prospectus are not consummated on
or prior to December 31, 2006. Such notes may also be
redeemed at our option, in whole, but not in part, at any time
prior to December 31, 2006, if, in our sole judgment, the
acquisition and related transactions will not be consummated by
that date. The redemption price in either case will be 100% of
the issue price of each series of the notes set forth above,
respectively, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption
date. Concurrently with the closing of the offering of such
notes, we will deposit with an escrow agent into separate escrow
accounts the net proceeds of each offering, together with an
amount of cash or treasury securities, so that the escrowed
funds are sufficient to fund the redemption of the notes, if
required. There can be no assurance that the acquisition will be
consummated by December 31, 2006, or at all.
In connection with the acquisition, on September 7, 2006,
Alderwoods commenced a tender offer to purchase
$200 million of its outstanding 7.75% Senior Notes due
2012 (the Alderwoods 7.75% Notes), and a
solicitation of consents to eliminate substantially all of the
restrictive covenants and certain events of default and to
modify certain other provisions of the indenture relating to the
Alderwoods 7.75% Notes. This tender offer was originally
scheduled to expire on October 5, 2006, but has been
extended to October 26, 2006, to coincide with the
anticipated closing of the acquisition. The tender offer may be
further extended if the closing date of the acquisition is later
than October 26, 2006. The tender offer is conditioned
upon, among other things, the tender of a majority of the
outstanding principal amount of the Alderwoods 7.75% Notes,
the consummation of the acquisition and the financing
transactions described above, and other customary conditions. As
of October 5, 2006, approximately $194,190,000 in aggregate
principal amount of the Alderwoods 7.75% Notes, or 97.10% of the
outstanding principal amount of the Alderwoods 7.75% Notes, and
the consents related thereto, were validly tendered. Withdrawal
rights of tendering holders of the Alderwoods 7.75% Notes that
tendered prior to the expiration of the consent solicitation on
September 20, 2006 (the Alderwoods Consent
Date), have expired. The total consideration payable in
respect of Alderwoods 7.75% Notes that were accepted for payment
and validly tendered and not withdrawn prior to the Alderwoods
Consent Date is $1,080.03 per $1,000 principal amount, which
includes a $20.00 consent payment payable only in respect of
Alderwoods 7.75% Notes that were tendered with consents on or
prior to the Alderwoods Consent Date. The total consideration
payable in respect of Alderwoods 7.75% Notes that are
validly tendered after the Alderwoods Consent Date and on or
prior to the expiration date is $1,060.03 per $1,000 principal
amount. Accrued and unpaid interest to but excluding the
settlement date will also be paid with respect to all existing
Alderwoods 7.75% Notes purchased in the tender offer.
In addition, on September 7, 2006, SCI commenced a tender
offer to purchase $144.5 million aggregate principal amount
of its outstanding 7.7% Senior Notes due 2009, CUSIP Nos:
817565AXZ; 817565AV6; 817565AW4 (the SCI
7.7% Notes), and a solicitation of consents to
eliminate substantially all of the restrictive covenants and
certain events of default and to modify certain other provisions
of the indenture relating to the SCI 7.7% Notes. This
tender offer was originally scheduled to expire on
October 5, 2006, but has been extended to October 26,
2006, to coincide with the anticipated closing of the
acquisition. The tender offer may be further extended if the
closing date of the acquisition is later than
6
October 26, 2006. The tender offer is conditioned upon,
among other things, the tender of a majority of the outstanding
SCI 7.7% Notes, the consummation of the acquisition
and the financing transactions described above, and other
customary conditions. As of October 5, 2006, approximately
$138,932,000 in aggregate principal amount of SCI 7.7% Notes, or
96.17% of the outstanding principal amount of the SCI 7.7%
Notes, and the consents related thereto, were validly tendered.
Withdrawal rights of tendering holders of the SCI 7.7% Notes
that tendered prior to the expiration of the consent
solicitation on September 20, 2006 (the SCI Consent
Date), have expired. The total consideration payable in
respect of SCI 7.7% Notes that were accepted for payment and
validly tendered and not withdrawn prior to the SCI Consent Date
is $1,058.11 per $1,000 principal amount, which includes a
$20.00 consent payment payable only in respect of SCI 7.7% Notes
that were tendered with consents on or prior to the SCI Consent
Date. The total consideration payable in respect of SCI 7.7%
Notes that are validly tendered after the SCI Consent Date and
on or prior to the expiration date is $1,038.11 per $1,000
principal amount. Accrued and unpaid interest to but excluding
the settlement date will also be paid with respect to all
existing SCI 7.7% Notes purchased in the tender offer. SCI
currently has outstanding a separate series of 7.7% Notes due
2009, which have different CUSIP numbers. SCI is not making a
tender offer or consent solicitation for these notes.
Furthermore, upon consummation of the acquisition, SCI and
Alderwoods will each terminate all commitments and Alderwoods
will repay all outstanding borrowings under its existing credit
facilities.
Planned Divestitures
SCI expects to execute a consent order with the staff of the FTC
in connection with the acquisition, which will identify certain
properties the FTC will require us to divest as a result of the
acquisition. The consent order will be subject to approval by
the FTC commissioners, which approval is a condition to the
consummation of the acquisition. No final agreement has been
reached with any third party concerning the sale of any such
assets. We believe that the divestiture of the FTC mandated
assets, together with the divestiture of other SCI assets that
we have identified for sale, will generate proceeds of
approximately $200 million in the near future, which we
expect to use to repay debt. There can be no assurance that the
divestitures described above will be consummated, or if
consummated will generate the proceeds described above. For
purposes of the pro forma information in this prospectus, the
assets to be sold pursuant to the divestitures have been
reclassified on the pro forma balance sheet as assets held for
sale and the results of operations of these assets have been
eliminated from the pro forma statement of operations. No pro
forma adjustments have been made to reflect any anticipated gain
or loss from the divestitures and no adjustment has been made to
reflect any earnings benefit from the reinvestment of any
proceeds from the divestitures or any reduction of debt from the
application of sales proceeds. In addition, after completion of
the acquisition, we intend to undertake a comprehensive review
of our integrated operations and we believe there may be further
asset sales as a result of that review within 18 months.
There can be no assurance that these asset sales will occur or
if they occur that they will be on terms favorable to us.
7
Summary of the Terms of the Exchange Offer
|
|
|
The Exchange Offer |
|
We are offering to exchange up to $300,000,000 aggregate
principal amount of the New Notes for up to $300,000,000
aggregate principal amount of the Old Notes. Old Notes may be
exchanged only in $1,000 increments. New Notes will be issued
only in minimum denominations of $1,000 and integral multiples
of $1,000. |
|
|
|
The terms of the New Notes are identical in all material
respects to the Old Notes except that the New Notes will not
contain terms with respect to transfer restrictions,
registration rights and payments of additional interest that
relate to the Old Notes. The New Notes and the Old Notes will be
governed by the same indenture, dated February 1, 1993. |
|
Registration Rights Agreement |
|
We issued $300,000,000 of the Old Notes on June 15, 2005 to
Merrill Lynch & Co., Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner & Smith Incorporated, J.P. Morgan Securities,
Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC, Lehman Brothers Inc. and
Raymond James & Associates, Inc., the initial
purchasers, under a purchase agreement dated June 10, 2005.
Pursuant to the purchase agreement, we and the initial
purchasers entered into a registration rights agreement relating
to the Old Notes pursuant to which we agreed to file, not later
than 90 days following the closing of the offering of the
Old Notes, this exchange offer registration statement with the
Commission with respect to a registered offer to exchange the
Old Notes for the New Notes. We also agreed to use our best
efforts to have this exchange offer registration statement
declared effective by the Commission within 180 days of the
closing of the offering of the Old Notes and to consummate the
exchange offer not later than 210 days following the
closing of the offering of the Old Notes. In the event we failed
to fulfill our obligations under the registration rights
agreement, additional interest would accrue on the Old Notes at
an annual rate of 0.25% for the first 90 days, increasing
by an additional 0.25% for each subsequent
90-day period up to a
maximum additional annual rate of 1.00%. See Exchange
Offer and Registration Rights. Because we were unable to
fulfill our obligations under the registration rights agreement,
we are currently paying additional interest of 1.00% on the Old
Notes. |
|
Expiration Date |
|
The exchange offer will expire at 5:00 p.m., New York
City time, on November 20, 2006, unless we extend the
exchange offer. See The Exchange Offer
Expiration Date; Extensions; Termination; Amendments. |
|
Conditions to the Exchange Offer |
|
The exchange offer is not subject to any conditions other than
that it does not violate applicable law or any applicable
interpretation of the staff of the Commission. |
|
Procedures for Tendering Old Notes |
|
If you wish to accept the exchange offer, sign and date the
letter of transmittal that was delivered with this prospectus in
accordance with the instructions, and deliver the letter of
transmittal, along with the Old Notes and any other required
documentation, to the exchange agent. Alternatively, you can |
8
|
|
|
|
|
tender your outstanding Old Notes by following the procedures
for book-entry transfer, as described in this prospectus. By
executing the letter of transmittal or by transmitting an
agents message in lieu thereof, you will represent to us
that, among other things: |
|
|
|
the New Notes you receive will be acquired in the
ordinary course of your business; |
|
|
you are not participating, and you have no
arrangement with any person or entity to participate, in the
distribution of the New Notes; |
|
|
you are not our affiliate, as defined in
Rule 405 under the Securities Act, or a broker-dealer
tendering Old Notes acquired directly from us for resale
pursuant to Rule 144A or any other available exemption
under the Securities Act; and |
|
|
if you are not a broker-dealer, that you are not
engaged in and do not intend to engage in the distribution of
the New Notes. |
|
Special Procedures for Beneficial Owners |
|
If you are a beneficial owner whose Old Notes are registered in
the name of a broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or
other nominee and wish to tender such Old Notes in the exchange
offer, please contact the registered holder as soon as possible
and instruct them to tender on your behalf and comply with our
instructions set forth elsewhere in this prospectus. |
|
Guaranteed Delivery Procedures |
|
If you wish to tender your Old Notes, you may, in certain
instances, do so according to the guaranteed delivery procedures
set forth elsewhere in this prospectus under The Exchange
Offer Procedures for Tendering Old Notes
Guaranteed Delivery. |
|
Effect of Not Tendering |
|
Old Notes that are not tendered or that are tendered but not
accepted will, following the completion of the exchange offer,
continue to be subject to the existing restrictions upon
transfer thereof. |
|
|
|
Old Notes that are not tendered will bear interest at a rate of
7.0% per annum. However, because we failed to fulfill our
obligations under the registration rights agreement, additional
interest is currently accruing on the Old Notes as discussed
under Registration Rights Agreement above. |
|
Withdrawal Rights |
|
You may withdraw Old Notes that you tender pursuant to the
exchange offer by furnishing a written or facsimile transmission
notice of withdrawal to the exchange agent containing the
information set forth in The Exchange Offer
Withdrawal of Tenders at any time prior to the expiration
date. |
|
Acceptance of Old Notes and Delivery of New Notes |
|
We will accept for exchange any and all Old Notes that are
properly tendered in the exchange offer prior to the expiration
date. See The Exchange Offer Procedures for
Tendering Old Notes. The New Notes issued pursuant to the
exchange offer will be delivered promptly following the
expiration date. |
9
|
|
|
Resale |
|
We believe that you will be able to freely transfer the New
Notes without registration or any prospectus delivery
requirement; however, certain broker-dealers and certain of our
affiliates may be required to deliver copies of this prospectus
if they resell any New Notes. |
|
Taxation |
|
The exchange of Old Notes for New Notes will not be a taxable
event for United States federal income tax purposes. See
United States Federal Income Tax Consequences. |
|
Broker-Dealers |
|
Each broker-dealer that receives New Notes for its own
account pursuant to the Exchange Offer must acknowledge that it
will deliver a prospectus in connection with any resale of such
New Notes. The letter of transmittal states that by so
acknowledging and by delivering a prospectus, a broker-dealer
will not be deemed to admit that it is an
underwriter within the meaning of the Securities
Act. This prospectus, as it may be amended or supplemented from
time to time, may be used by a broker-dealer in connection with
resales of New Notes received in exchange for
Old Notes where such Old Notes were acquired by such
broker-dealer as a result of market-making activities or other
trading activities. See Plan of Distribution. |
|
Exchange Agent and Information Agent |
|
Global Bondholder Services Corporation is the exchange agent and
the information agent for the exchange offer. The address and
phone number of Global Bondholder Services Corporation are on
the inside of the back cover of this prospectus. |
10
Summary of Terms of New Notes
|
|
|
Issuer |
|
Service Corporation International |
|
New Notes |
|
$300,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 7.0% Senior Notes due
2017 |
|
Maturity Date |
|
June 15, 2017 |
|
Interest Rate |
|
7.0% per annum, accruing from June 15, 2005 or from the
date most recently paid |
|
Interest Payment Dates |
|
June 15 and December 15, commencing on
December 15, 2006 |
|
Ranking |
|
The New Notes will be our general unsecured obligations and will
rank equal in right of payment with all of our other
unsubordinated indebtedness and senior in right of payment to
any of our future subordinated indebtedness. The New Notes will
be effectively subordinated to all of our existing and future
secured indebtedness to the extent of the collateral securing
such indebtedness and to all indebtedness and other obligations
of our subsidiaries, whether or not secured, including
subsidiary guarantees of our new credit facility and our
privately placed debt securities. |
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2006, after giving pro forma effect to the
transactions: |
|
|
|
our senior indebtedness would have been
approximately $2,034.0 million, including
$180.1 million of indebtedness under the new senior credit
facility (excluding unused availability under our new revolving
credit facility and outstanding letters of credit),
$1,011.2 million of currently outstanding senior notes,
$500.0 million of notes offered in a private placement,
$200.0 million of privately placed debt securities,
$21.2 million of convertible debentures, and
$121.5 million of other indebtedness; and |
|
|
|
our subsidiaries would have had approximately
$1,256.0 million of total indebtedness and other
liabilities outstanding, including trade payables and excluding
guarantees of our new senior credit facility, our privately
placed debt securities, intercompany obligations and deferred
revenue. |
|
Optional Redemption |
|
The New Notes will be redeemable in whole or in part, at our
option at any time, at redemption prices as set forth in this
prospectus under Description of the Notes
Optional Redemption, plus accrued and unpaid interest to
the redemption date. |
|
Restrictive Covenants |
|
We will issue the New Notes under the same indenture under which
the Old Notes were issued. The indenture contains covenants
limiting the creation of liens securing indebtedness and
sale-leaseback transactions. These covenants are subject to
important exceptions. See Risk Factors Risks
Related to Tendering Old Notes for New Notes The New
Notes lack subsidiary guarantees and some covenants typically
found in |
11
|
|
|
|
|
other comparably rated debt securities, and
Description of the Notes Covenants for
more information. |
|
Use of Proceeds |
|
We will not receive any proceeds from the exchange of the New
Notes for the outstanding Old Notes. |
|
Governing Law |
|
The New Notes will be, and the indenture is, governed by, and
construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Texas. |
|
Trustee, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent |
|
The Bank of New York |
|
Book-Entry Depository |
|
The Depository Trust Company |
You should read the Risk Factors section
beginning on page 13, as well as the other cautionary
statements throughout this prospectus, to ensure you understand
the risks involved with the exchange of the New Notes for the
outstanding Old Notes.
12
RISK FACTORS
Before you decide to participate in the exchange offer, you
should read the risks, uncertainties and factors that may
adversely affect us that are discussed under the captions
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and Cautionary
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements, as well as
the following additional risk factors.
Risks Related to Tendering Old Notes for New Notes
|
|
|
You may find it difficult to sell your New Notes because
there is no existing trading market for the New Notes. |
You may find it difficult to sell your New Notes because an
active trading market for the New Notes may not develop. There
is no existing trading market for the New Notes. We do not
intend to apply for listing or quotation of the New Notes on any
securities exchange, and so we do not know the extent to which
investor interest will lead to the development of a trading
market or how liquid that market might be. Although the initial
purchasers have informed us that they intend to make a market in
the New Notes, they are not obligated to do so, and any
market-making may be discontinued at any time without notice. As
a result, the market price of the New Notes, as well as your
ability to sell the New Notes, could be adversely affected.
|
|
|
Because we are a holding company, your rights under the
New Notes will be effectively subordinated to the rights of
holders of our subsidiaries liabilities. |
Because we are a holding company, our cash flow and ability to
service debt, including the New Notes, depend upon the
distribution of earnings, loans or other payments made by our
subsidiaries to us. Our subsidiaries are separate legal entities
and have no obligation with respect to the New Notes. In
addition, payment of dividends, distributions, loans or advances
by our subsidiaries to us could be subject to statutory or
contractual restrictions. The New Notes will be effectively
subordinated to all of the existing and future obligations of
our subsidiaries. Our new senior credit facility is guaranteed
by all of our material domestic subsidiaries, which conduct
substantially all of our operating activities. As of
June 30, 2006, on a pro forma basis after giving effect to
the transactions, our subsidiaries would have had approximately
$1,256.0 million of total indebtedness and other
liabilities outstanding, including trade payables and excluding
guarantees of our new senior credit facility and our privately
placed debt securities, intercompany obligations and deferred
revenues.
|
|
|
The New Notes are unsecured and will be effectively
subordinated to all of our existing and future secured
obligations to the extent of the collateral securing such
obligations. |
The New Notes are unsecured and will be effectively subordinated
to all of our existing and future secured obligations to the
extent of the collateral securing such obligations. As of
June 30, 2006, after giving pro forma effect to the
transactions, we would have had approximately
$2,034.0 million of outstanding indebtedness, including
$180.1 million of indebtedness under our new senior credit
facility (excluding the $269.9 million unfunded portion of
our new revolving credit facility and outstanding letters of
credit), $1,011.2 million of currently outstanding senior
notes, $200.0 million of privately placed debt securities,
$500.0 million of notes offered in a private placement,
$21.2 million of convertible debentures, and
$121.5 million of other indebtedness. These amounts do not
reflect the application of any proceeds that may be realized
from the divestitures. See Summary Planned
Divestitures. As of June 30, 2006, on a pro forma
basis after giving effect to the transactions, we would have had
approximately $122 million of secured indebtedness, which
is effectively senior to the notes. Substantially all of our
secured indebtedness consists of capital leases.
13
|
|
|
The New Notes lack subsidiary guarantees and some
covenants typically found in other comparably rated public debt
securities. |
Although the New Notes are rated below investment grade by both
Standard & Poors and Moodys Investors Service,
they lack the protection of subsidiary guarantees and several
financial and other restrictive covenants typically associated
with comparably rated public debt securities, including:
|
|
|
|
|
incurrence of additional indebtedness; |
|
|
|
payment of dividends and other restricted payments; |
|
|
|
sale of assets and the use of proceeds therefrom; |
|
|
|
transactions with affiliates; and |
|
|
|
dividend and other payment restrictions affecting subsidiaries. |
|
|
|
If an active trading market does not develop for the New
Notes, you may be unable to sell the New Notes or to sell them
at a price you deem sufficient. |
The New Notes will be new securities for which there is no
established trading market. We do not intend to apply for
listing of the New Notes on any securities exchange or for
quotation through any automated dealer quotation system.
Accordingly, no assurance can be given as to the liquidity of,
or adequate trading markets for, the New Notes.
|
|
|
If we breach any of the material financial covenants under
our various indentures, revolving credit facility or guarantees,
our debt service obligations could be accelerated. |
If we or any of our consolidated subsidiaries breach any of the
material financial covenants under our various indentures or our
new senior credit facility, our substantial debt service
obligations, including the New Notes, could be accelerated.
Furthermore, any breach of any of the material financial
covenants under our new senior credit facility could result in
the acceleration of the indebtedness of all of our subsidiaries.
In the event of any such simultaneous acceleration, we would not
be able to repay all of our indebtedness.
|
|
|
The restrictions contained in our various indentures do
not limit our ability to issue additional indebtedness. |
We could enter into acquisitions, recapitalizations or other
transactions that could increase our outstanding indebtedness.
The indenture governing the notes does not limit our ability to
incur additional indebtedness. Although covenants under the
credit agreement governing our new senior credit facility and
under the privately placed debt securities will limit our
ability and the ability of our present and future subsidiaries
to incur certain additional indebtedness, the terms of the
credit agreement and those debt securities will permit us to
incur significant additional indebtedness, including unused
availability under our new senior credit facility. Additionally,
under the credit agreement, we are permitted to pay dividends
and repurchase stock, subject to certain conditions. Issuing
additional indebtedness could materially impact our business by
making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with
respect to the New Notes; increasing our vulnerability to
general adverse economic and industry conditions; limiting our
ability to obtain additional financing; requiring us to dedicate
a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to
payments on our indebtedness, which will reduce the amount of
our cash flow available for other purposes, including capital
expenditures and other general corporate purposes; limiting our
flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our
business and our industry; and placing us at a possible
competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have
less debt or the ability to use their cash flows for such
purposes as described above.
14
Risk Related to Continuing Ownership of the Old Notes
|
|
|
If you fail to exchange your outstanding Old Notes for New
Notes, you will continue to hold notes subject to transfer
restrictions. |
We will only issue New Notes in exchange for outstanding Old
Notes that you timely and properly tender. Therefore, you should
allow sufficient time to ensure timely delivery of the
outstanding Old Notes and you should carefully follow the
instructions on how to tender your Old Notes set forth under
The Exchange Offer Procedures for Tendering
Old Notes and in the letter of transmittal that
accompanies this prospectus. Neither we nor the exchange agent
are required to notify you of any defects or irregularities
relating to your tender of outstanding Old Notes.
If you do not exchange your outstanding Old Notes for New Notes
in this exchange offer, the outstanding Old Notes you hold will
continue to be subject to the existing transfer restrictions. In
general, you may not offer or sell the outstanding Old Notes
except under an exemption from, or in a transaction not subject
to, the Securities Act and applicable state securities laws. We
do not plan to register the outstanding Old Notes under the
Securities Act. If you continue to hold any outstanding Old
Notes after this exchange offer is completed, you may have
trouble selling them because of these restrictions on transfer.
|
|
|
The trading market for unexchanged Old Notes could be
limited. |
The trading market for unexchanged Old Notes could become
significantly more limited after the exchange offer due to the
reduction in the amount of Old Notes outstanding upon
consummation of the exchange offer. Therefore, if your Old Notes
are not exchanged for New Notes in the exchange offer, it may
become more difficult for you to sell or otherwise transfer your
Old Notes. This reduction in liquidity may in turn reduce the
market price, and increase the price volatility, of the Old
Notes. There is a risk that an active trading market in the
unexchanged Old Notes will not exist, develop or be maintained
and we cannot give you any assurances regarding the prices at
which the unexchanged Old Notes may trade in the future.
Risks Related to the Acquisition of Alderwoods
|
|
|
We may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of the
acquisition of Alderwoods. |
The success of the acquisition will depend, in part, on our
ability to realize the anticipated cost savings from shared
corporate and administrative areas and the rationalization of
duplicative expenses. However, to realize the anticipated
benefits from the acquisition, we must successfully combine the
businesses of SCI and Alderwoods in a manner that permits those
costs savings to be realized. If we are not able to successfully
achieve these objectives, the anticipated benefits of the
acquisition may not be realized fully or at all or may take
longer or cost more to realize than expected. SCI and Alderwoods
have operated and, until the completion of the acquisition, will
continue to operate, independently. It is possible that the
integration process could result in the loss of valuable
employees, the disruption of each companys ongoing
business or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures,
practices, and policies that could adversely impact our
operations.
|
|
|
The acquisition of Alderwoods may prove disruptive and
could result in the combined business failing to meet our
expectations. |
The process of integrating the operations of Alderwoods may
require a disproportionate amount of resources and management
attention. Our future operations and cash flows will depend
largely upon our ability to operate Alderwoods efficiently,
achieve the strategic operating objectives for our business and
realize significant cost savings and synergies. Our management
team may encounter unforeseen difficulties in managing the
integration. In order to successfully combine and operate our
businesses, our management team will need to focus on realizing
anticipated synergies and cost savings on a timely basis while
maintaining the efficiency of our operations. Any substantial
diversion of management attention or
15
difficulties in operating the combined business could affect our
revenues and ability to achieve operational, financial and
strategic objectives.
|
|
|
Our historical and pro forma combined financial
information may not be representative of our results as a
combined company. |
The historical financial information included in this prospectus
is constructed from the separate financial statements of SCI and
Alderwoods for periods prior to the consummation of the
acquisition. The pro forma combined financial information
presented in this prospectus is based in part on certain
assumptions regarding the acquisition that we believe are
reasonable. We cannot assure you that our assumptions will prove
to be accurate over time. Accordingly, the historical and pro
forma combined financial information included in this prospectus
may not reflect what our results of operations and financial
condition would have been had we been a combined entity during
the periods presented, or what our results of operations and
financial condition will be in the future. The challenge of
integrating previously independent businesses make evaluating
our business and our future financial prospects difficult. Our
potential for future business success and operating
profitability must be considered in light of the risks,
uncertainties, expenses and difficulties typically encountered
by recently organized or combined companies.
Risks Related to our Business
|
|
|
Our ability to execute our business plan depends on many
factors, many of which are beyond our control. |
Our strategic plan is focused on cost management and the
development of key revenue initiatives designed to generate
future internal growth in our core funeral and cemetery
operations. Many of the factors necessary for the execution of
our strategic plan, such as the number of deaths, are beyond our
control. We cannot assure you that we will be able to execute
any or all of our strategic plan. Failure to execute any or all
of the strategic plan could have a material adverse effect on
us, our financial condition, results of operations, or cash
flows.
|
|
|
Our new credit agreement and privately placed debt
securities contain covenants that may prevent us from engaging
in certain transactions. |
Our new credit agreement and privately placed debt securities
contain, among other things, various affirmative and negative
covenants that may prevent us from engaging in certain
transactions that might otherwise be considered beneficial to
us. These covenants limit, among other things, our and our
subsidiaries ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness (including guarantee obligations); |
|
|
|
create liens on assets; |
|
|
|
enter into sale and leaseback transactions; |
|
|
|
engage in mergers, liquidations and dissolutions; |
|
|
|
sell assets; |
|
|
|
enter into leases; |
|
|
|
pay dividends, distributions and other payments in respect of
capital stock, and purchase our capital stock in the open market; |
|
|
|
make investments, loans or advances; |
|
|
|
repay subordinated indebtedness or amend the agreements relating
thereto; |
|
|
|
engage in certain transactions with affiliates; |
|
|
|
change our fiscal year; |
16
|
|
|
|
|
create restrictions on our ability to receive distributions from
subsidiaries; and |
|
|
|
change our lines of business. |
Our new senior credit facility also requires us to maintain
certain leverage and interest coverage ratios.
|
|
|
If we lost the ability to use surety bonding to support
our preneed funeral and preneed cemetery activities, we could
have to make material cash payments to fund certain trust
funds. |
We have entered into arrangements with certain surety companies
whereby such companies agree to issue surety bonds on our behalf
as financial assurance or as required by existing state and
local regulations. The surety bonds are used for various
business purposes; however, the majority of the surety bonds
issued and outstanding have been issued to support our preneed
funeral and cemetery activities. In the event all of the surety
companies cancelled or did not renew SCIs surety bonds,
which are generally renewed for twelve-month periods, SCI would
be required to either obtain replacement coverage or fund
approximately $285.7 million and $277.5 million as of
December 31, 2005 and June 30, 2006, respectively,
into state-mandated trust accounts.
|
|
|
The funeral home and cemetery industry continues to be
increasingly competitive. |
In North America and most international regions in which we
operate, the funeral and cemetery industry is characterized by a
large number of locally owned, independent operations. To
compete successfully, our funeral service locations and
cemeteries must maintain good reputations and high professional
standards in the industry, as well as offer attractive products
and services at competitive prices. In addition, we must market
our Company in such a manner as to distinguish us from our
competitors. We have historically experienced price competition
from independent funeral home and cemetery operators, monument
dealers, casket retailers, low-cost funeral providers and other
non-traditional providers of services and merchandise. If we are
unable to successfully compete, our Company, our financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows could be
materially adversely affected.
|
|
|
Our affiliated funeral and cemetery trust funds own
investments in equity securities and mutual funds, which are
affected by financial market conditions that are beyond our
control. |
In connection with our preneed funeral operations and preneed
cemetery merchandise and service sales, most affiliated funeral
and cemetery trust funds own investments in equity securities
and mutual funds. Our earnings and investment gains and losses
on these equity securities and mutual funds are affected by
financial market conditions that are beyond our control.
As of December 31, 2005, net unrealized appreciation in
SCIs preneed funeral and cemetery merchandise and services
trust funds amounted to $13.9 million and
$48.2 million, respectively. SCIs perpetual care
trust funds had net unrealized appreciation of
$21.4 million as of December 31, 2005. The following
table summarizes SCIs investment returns excluding fees on
its trust funds for the last three years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Preneed funeral trust funds
|
|
|
17.9% |
|
|
|
7.1% |
|
|
|
6.6% |
|
Cemetery merchandise services trust funds
|
|
|
17.1% |
|
|
|
6.7% |
|
|
|
6.9% |
|
Perpetual care trust funds
|
|
|
12.6% |
|
|
|
8.6% |
|
|
|
3.9% |
|
The following table summarizes Alderwoods investment
returns excluding fees on its trust funds for the entire trust
portfolio for the last three years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total trust portfolio
|
|
|
7.7% |
|
|
|
5.0% |
|
|
|
3.1% |
|
If our earnings from our trust funds decline, we would likely
experience a decline in future revenues. In addition, if the
trust funds experienced significant investment losses, there
would likely be insufficient
17
funds in the trusts to cover the costs of delivering services
and merchandise or maintaining cemeteries in the future. We
would have to cover any such shortfall with cash flows, which
could have a material adverse effect on us, our financial
condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
|
|
|
Increasing death benefits related to preneed funeral
contracts funded through life insurance or annuity contracts may
not cover future increases in the cost of providing a price
guaranteed funeral service. |
We sell price guaranteed preneed funeral contracts through
various programs providing for future funeral services at prices
prevailing when the agreements are signed. For preneed funeral
contracts funded through life insurance or annuity contracts,
SCI and Alderwoods receive in cash a general agency commission
that typically averages 14% and 9%, respectively, of the total
sale from the third party insurance company. Additionally, there
is an increasing death benefit associated with the contract of
between 1% (for SCI) and 3% (for Alderwoods) per year to be
received in cash by us at the time the funeral is performed.
There is no guarantee that the increasing death benefit will
cover future increases in the cost of providing a price
guaranteed funeral service, which could materially adversely
affect our future cash flows, revenues and operating margins.
|
|
|
If our insurance subsidiarys actual claims
experience differs from its underwriting and reserving
assumptions, or if it suffers investment losses, our operating
results and financial position could be adversely
affected. |
We set prices for our preneed insurance products and establish
reserves to pay future policy benefits under such products based
upon actuarial or statistical estimates, using many assumptions
and projections, which involve the exercise of significant
judgment, including as to the levels and timing of the receipt
or payment of premiums, benefits, claims, expenses, investment
results, mortality, morbidity and persistency. If our actual
claims experience differs from our underwriting and reserving
assumptions, or if we otherwise determine that our reserves are
inadequate to pay future policy benefits, it could adversely
impact our operating results and financial position. Our
insurance subsidiary invests in fixed maturity investments, cash
and short-term investments, which are affected by financial
market conditions that are beyond our control. If earnings from
these investments decline, we would likely have insufficient
funds to pay future benefits under our preneed products. We
would have to cover any such shortfall with operating cash
flows, which could have a material adverse effect on our
operating results and financial condition.
|
|
|
Unfavorable results of litigation could have a material
adverse impact on our financial statements. |
As discussed in note thirteen to SCIs annual financial
statements and note ten to its interim financial statements
and note 9 to Alderwoods annual financial statements
and note 4 to its interim financial statements, each
included elsewhere in this prospectus, SCI, Alderwoods and their
respective subsidiaries are subject to a variety of claims and
lawsuits. Adverse outcomes in some or all of the pending cases
may result in significant monetary damages or injunctive relief.
SCI, Alderwoods and their respective subsidiaries are also
subject to a variety of other claims and suits that arise from
time to time in the ordinary course of our business. While
management currently believes that resolving all of these
matters, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a
material adverse impact on our financial position or results of
operations, litigation and other claims are subject to inherent
uncertainties and managements view of these matters may
change in the future. There exists the possibility of a material
adverse impact on our financial position and the results of
operations for the period in which the effect of an unfavorable
final outcome becomes probable and reasonably estimable.
|
|
|
If the number of deaths in our regions declines, our cash
flows and revenues may decrease. |
The U.S. Census Bureau estimates that the number of deaths
in the United States will increase up to one percent per year
until 2010. However, longer life spans could reduce the number
of deaths during this period. If the number of deaths declines,
the number of funeral services and interments performed by us
could decrease and our financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.
18
|
|
|
The continuing upward trend in the number of cremations
performed in North America could result in lower revenue and
gross profit dollars. |
There is a continuing upward trend in the number of cremations
performed in North America as an alternative to traditional
funeral service dispositions. In North America for the six
months ended June 30, 2006, 41% of the comparable funeral
services performed by SCI were cremation cases compared to 40%
and 39% performed in years 2005 and 2004, respectively. In North
America for the twenty-four weeks ended June 17, 2006,
38% of the comparable funeral services performed by Alderwoods
were cremation cases compared to 36% and 35% performed during
the fifty-two weeks ended December 31, 2005 and
January 1, 2005, respectively. We continue to expand our
cremation memorialization products and services, which has
resulted in higher average sales for cremation services. If we
are unable to successfully expand our cremation memorialization
products and services to meet the continuing trends, our
financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows could
be materially adversely affected.
|
|
|
The funeral home and cemetery businesses are high
fixed-cost businesses. |
The majority of our operations are managed in groups called
regions. Regions are geographical groups of funeral
service locations and cemeteries that share common resources
such as operating personnel, preparation services, clerical
staff, motor vehicles and preneed sales personnel. Personnel
costs, the largest of our operating expenses, are the cost
components most beneficially affected by this grouping. We must
incur many of these costs regardless of the number of funeral
services or interments performed. Because we cannot necessarily
decrease these costs when we experience lower sales volumes, a
sales decline may cause margin percentages to decline at a
greater rate than the decline in revenues.
|
|
|
Fluctuations in the value of the Canadian dollar could
result in currency exchange losses. |
A portion of our corporate and administrative expenses are
payable in Canadian dollars, while most of our revenue is
generated in United States dollars and we report our financial
statements in United States dollars. Therefore, a strengthening
of the Canadian dollar relative to the United States dollar will
adversely affect our results of operations. Expenses for
Alderwoods corporate and administrative functions are paid
principally in Canadian dollars and have predictable future cash
outflows (Foreign Currency Expenditure). We have a
program to hedge the variability in the United States dollar
equivalent of a portion of the Foreign Currency Expenditure due
to the fluctuation in the exchange rate between the United
States dollar and the Canadian dollar (Foreign Currency
Hedge Program). We use forward foreign exchange contracts
and foreign exchange option contracts to partially mitigate
foreign exchange variability. Under the Foreign Currency Hedge
Program, losses or gains in our underlying foreign exchange
exposure are partially offset by gains or losses on the forward
foreign exchange contracts and foreign exchange option
contracts, so as to reduce the magnitude of foreign exchange
transaction gains or losses. Any hedging activities we undertake
may not be successful in mitigating all of this risk.
|
|
|
Regulation and compliance could have a material adverse
impact on our financial results. |
Our operations are subject to regulation, supervision, and
licensing under numerous foreign, federal, state and local laws,
ordinances and regulations, including extensive regulations
concerning trust funds, preneed sales of funeral and cemetery
products and services, and various other aspects of our
business. The impact of such regulations varies depending on the
location of our funeral and cemetery operations. Violations of
applicable laws could result in fines or sanctions to us.
In addition, from time to time, governments and agencies propose
to amend or add regulations, which would increase costs and
decrease cash flows. For example, foreign, federal, state, local
and other regulatory agencies have considered and may enact
additional legislation or regulations that could affect the
deathcare industry, such as regulations that require more
liberal refund and cancellation policies for preneed sales of
products and services, limit or eliminate our ability to use
surety bonding, increase trust requirements and prohibit the
common ownership of funeral homes and cemeteries in the same
region. If adopted by the regulatory authorities of the
jurisdictions in which we operate, these and other possible
19
proposals could have a material adverse effect on us, our
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Compliance with laws, regulations, industry standards and
customs concerning burial procedures and the handling and care
of human remains is critical to our continued success.
Litigation and regulatory proceedings regarding these issues
could have a material adverse effect on us, our financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows. We are
continually monitoring and reviewing our operations in an effort
to insure that we are in compliance with these laws, regulations
and standards and, where appropriate, taking appropriate
corrective action.
|
|
|
Our foreign operations and investments involve special
risks. |
Our activities in areas outside the United States are subject to
risks inherent in foreign operations, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
loss of revenue, property and equipment as a result of hazards
such as expropriation, nationalization, wars, insurrection and
other political risks; |
|
|
|
the effects of currency fluctuations and exchange controls, such
as devaluation of foreign currencies and other economic
problems; and |
|
|
|
changes in laws, regulations, and policies of foreign
governments, including those associated with changes in the
governing parties. |
|
|
|
A number of years may elapse before particular tax
matters, for which we have established accruals, are audited and
finally resolved. |
The number of tax years with open tax audits varies depending on
the tax jurisdiction. In the United States, the Internal Revenue
Service is currently examining SCIs tax returns for 1999
through 2002 and various state jurisdictions are auditing years
through 2004. While it is often difficult to predict the final
outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular tax
matter, we believe that our accruals reflect the probable
outcome of known tax contingencies. Unfavorable settlement of
any particular issue would reduce a deferred tax asset or
require the use of cash. Favorable resolution could result in
reduced income tax expense reported in the financial statements
in the future. The tax accruals are presented in SCIs
balance sheet within Other liabilities.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We make forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 in this
prospectus. These statements may be accompanied by words such as
believe, estimate, project,
expect, anticipate or
predict that convey the uncertainty of future events
or outcomes. These statements are based on assumptions that we
believe are reasonable; however, many important factors could
cause our actual results in the future to differ materially from
the forward-looking statements made in this prospectus and in
any other documents or oral presentations made by us or on our
behalf. Important factors that could cause our actual results to
differ materially from those in forward-looking statements
include, among others, the factors described in this prospectus
under Risk Factors.
You should not place undue reliance on
forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date of this prospectus.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
Each of SCI and Alderwoods file annual, quarterly and special
reports, proxy statements and other information with the
Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. You may
read and copy this information at the Commissions public
reference room, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.
20
You may also obtain copies of this information by mail from the
public reference section of the Commission,
100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, at
prescribed rates. Please call the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330
for further information on the public reference rooms. The
Commission also maintains an Internet world wide web site that
contains reports, proxy statements and other information about
issuers, including SCI and Alderwoods, who file electronically
with the Commission. The address of that site is
www.sec.gov. You can also inspect reports, proxy
statements and other information about SCI at the offices of the
New York Stock Exchange, Inc., located at 20 Broad Street, New
York, New York 10005. You can also inspect reports, proxy
statements and other information about Alderwoods at the offices
of the NASDAQ National Market at 1735 K Street, N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20006. In addition, you can obtain
certain documents, including those filed with the Commission,
through SCIs website at
www.sci-corp.com
and Alderwoods website at www.alderwoods.com.
This prospectus is part of a registration statement on
Form S-4 that we
have filed with the SEC. As allowed by SEC rules, this
prospectus does not contain all the documents and other
information you can find in the registration statement or the
exhibits filed with the registration statement. Whenever a
reference is made in this prospectus to an agreement or other
document of Service Corporation International be aware that such
reference is not necessarily complete and that you should refer
to the exhibits that are filed with the registration statement
for a copy of the agreement or other document. You may review a
copy of the registration statement at the SECs public
reference room in Washington, D.C., as well as through the
SECs website as described above. You may also obtain any
of the documents referenced in this prospectus from us free of
charge by requesting them in writing or by telephone from us at
the following address:
Service Corporation International
1929 Allen Parkway
Houston, Texas 77019
Attention: James M. Shelger, Esq.
Telephone No.: (713) 522-5141
To obtain timely delivery of any requested documents, you
must request the information no later than five business days
before you make your investment decision. Please make any such
requests on or before November 13, 2006.
We have not authorized anyone to give any information or make
any representation that differs from, or adds to, the
information in this document or in our documents that are
publicly filed with the Commission. Therefore, if anyone does
give you different or additional information, you should not
rely on it.
If you are in a jurisdiction where it is unlawful to offer to
exchange or sell, or to ask for offers to exchange or buy, the
securities offered by this document, or if you are a person to
whom it is unlawful to direct these activities, then the offer
presented by this document does not extend to you.
The information contained in this document speaks only as of
its date unless the information specifically indicates that
another date applies.
21
USE OF PROCEEDS
This exchange offer is intended to satisfy our obligations under
the registration rights agreement entered into in connection
with our issuance of the Old Notes. We received net proceeds of
approximately $291 million from the issuance of the Old
Notes after deducting initial purchasers discounts and
offering expenses. We used the net proceeds of the Old Notes,
together with available cash, to pay for the $282.3 million
aggregate principal amount, premium and accrued interest of our
7.2% Notes due 2006 and 6.875% Notes due 2007 tendered pursuant
to our tender offers for those notes.
We will not receive any cash proceeds from the issuance of the
New Notes. We will exchange outstanding Old Notes for New Notes
in like principal amount as contemplated in this prospectus. The
terms of the New Notes are identical in all material respects to
the existing Old Notes except as otherwise described herein
under Description of the Notes. The Old Notes
surrendered in exchange for the New Notes will be retired and
canceled and cannot be reissued. Accordingly, issuance of the
New Notes will not result in a change in our total debt and
other financing obligations.
CAPITALIZATION
The following table shows SCIs cash and cash equivalents
and capitalization as of June 30, 2006, on an as reported
basis, and our cash and cash equivalents and capitalization on a
pro forma basis to reflect the transactions. The exchange of the
Old Notes for the New Notes will not impact our overall total
capitalization. This table is unaudited and should be read in
conjunction with Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial
Information, Selected Historical Financial
Information of SCI, Selected Historical Financial
Information of Alderwoods, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, and SCIs and Alderwoods interim
financial statements and related notes, which are included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Actual | |
|
Pro forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Cash and cash equivalents(1)
|
|
$ |
529.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New senior credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility(1)(2)
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
30.1 |
|
|
|
Term loan(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150.0 |
|
|
Privately placed debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200.0 |
|
|
Privately placed notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500.0 |
|
|
Existing senior notes due 2007
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
Existing senior notes due 2008
|
|
|
195.0 |
|
|
|
195.0 |
|
|
Existing senior notes due 2009(3)
|
|
|
341.6 |
|
|
|
197.1 |
|
|
Existing senior debentures due 2013
|
|
|
55.6 |
|
|
|
55.6 |
|
|
Existing senior notes due 2016
|
|
|
250.0 |
|
|
|
250.0 |
|
|
New Notes
|
|
|
300.0 |
|
|
|
300.0 |
|
|
Existing convertible debentures, maturities through 2013
|
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
Other debt(4)
|
|
|
118.8 |
|
|
|
121.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
1,295.7 |
|
|
|
2,034.0 |
|
Total stockholders equity(5)
|
|
|
1,608.9 |
|
|
|
1,578.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$ |
2,904.6 |
|
|
$ |
3,612.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
At June 30, 2006, SCI and Alderwoods had
$537.6 million of combined cash on hand. At
September 13, 2006, SCI and Alderwoods had approximately
$631 million of combined cash on hand. We intend to keep
approximately $50 million in cash on hand after the closing
of the acquisition. Therefore, to the extent cash on hand at
closing exceeds approximately $590 million, revolver
borrowings under the new senior credit facility reflected above
will be reduced. |
22
|
|
(2) |
Based on expected cash balances at closing, we do not expect to
have drawings under our revolving credit facility. In connection
with the closing of the acquisition, SCI will replace its
existing $200 million senior credit facility with a new
$450 million senior credit facility, consisting of a
$150 million 3-year term loan, all of which will be
borrowed in connection with the transactions, and a
$300 million 5-year revolving credit facility. Based on
cash balances at June 30, 2006, we would have borrowed
$30.1 million under the new revolving credit facility in
connection with the transactions. See footnote (1) above.
Availability under the new revolving credit facility will be
further reduced by outstanding letters of credit. At
June 30, 2006, our pro forma outstanding letters of credit
were approximately $70.1 million. |
|
(3) |
SCI commenced a tender offer on September 7, 2006 to
purchase $144.5 million aggregate principal amount of the
SCI 7.7% Notes. This tender offer was originally scheduled to
expire on October 5, 2006, but has been extended to
October 26, 2006, to coincide with the anticipated closing
of the acquisition. The tender offer may be further extended if
the closing date of the acquisition is later than
October 26, 2006. |
|
(4) |
Primarily includes capital leases, mortgage notes, and
unamortized discounts. Pro forma other debt excludes
$13.5 million of capital leases and other debt related to
assets held for sale. Pro forma other debt includes the
elimination of unamortized discount of $9.7 million
relating to the SCI 7.7% Notes with respect to which SCI has
commenced a tender offer. See footnote (3) above. |
|
(5) |
Adjustments to equity include $25.0 million of estimated
tender premiums, $4.3 million of transaction fees and
$18.3 million to write-off unamortized discounts and
deferred financing costs related to the extinguished debt, net
of a $17.6 million tax benefit. |
23
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF SCI
The selected historical financial data set forth below as of
December 31, 2004 and 2005 and for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 have been derived from
SCIs annual financial statements included elsewhere in
this prospectus. The selected historical financial data set
forth below as of December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003 and for
the fiscal years ended December 31, 2001 and 2002 have been
derived from annual financial statements that are not included
in this prospectus. The selected historical financial data for
the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2006 have been
derived from SCIs interim financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus which, in the opinion of
management, include all adjustments necessary for a fair
presentation of that information for such periods. The selected
historical financial data presented for the interim periods has
been prepared in a manner consistent with the accounting
policies of SCI described elsewhere in this prospectus and
should be read in conjunction therewith. Operating results for
interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results
that may be expected for the full year period.
SCI has restated its previously reported selected financial data
for each of the five fiscal years in the period ended
December 31, 2005, as well as its unaudited quarterly
financial data for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The
restatement corrected errors related to (1) the
miscalculation of SCIs actuarially determined pension
benefit obligation, (2) the accounting for certain leases
related to funeral home properties which were previously
accounted for as operating leases but should have been accounted
for as capital leases, and (3) other out-of-period
adjustments previously identified by SCI but deemed to be not
material either individually or in the aggregate. For additional
information regarding the restatement, see note two to
SCIs annual financial statements and note two to
SCIs interim financial statements included elsewhere in
this prospectus.
During 2005, SCI sold its funeral and cemetery operations in
Argentina and Uruguay and its cemetery operations in Chile.
These operations are classified as discontinued operations for
all periods presented.
In 2005, SCI changed its method of accounting for direct selling
costs related to the acquisition of preneed funeral and cemetery
contracts. Prior to this change, SCI capitalized such direct
selling costs and amortized these costs in proportion to the
revenue recognized. Under its new method of accounting,
SCI expenses these direct selling costs as incurred. As a
result of this accounting change, SCI recorded a cumulative
effect charge of $187.5 million, net of tax, in 2005. For
more information regarding this accounting change, see note four
to SCIs annual financial statements included elsewhere in
this prospectus.
On March 31, 2004, SCI implemented revised Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation
No. 46 (FIN 46R). Under the provisions of
FIN 46R, SCI is required to consolidate preneed funeral and
cemetery merchandise and service trust assets, cemetery
perpetual care trusts, and certain cemeteries. As a result of
this accounting change, SCI recognized a cumulative effect
charge of $14.0 million, net of tax, in 2004.
In 2004, SCI also changed its method of accounting for gains and
losses on its pension plan assets and obligations to recognize
such gains and losses as they are incurred. Prior to the
adoption of this change, SCI amortized the difference between
actual and expected investment returns and actuarial gains and
losses over seven years. As a result of this accounting change,
SCI recognized a charge for the cumulative effect of
$36.6 million, net of tax, in 2004.
In 2002, SCI adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets (SFAS 142). SFAS 142
addresses accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets
and redefines useful lives, amortization periods and impairment
of goodwill. Under the pronouncement, goodwill is no longer
amortized, but is tested for impairment annually by assessing
the fair value of reporting units, generally one level below
reportable segments. As a result of the adoption of
SFAS 142, SCI recognized a non-cash charge in 2002
reflected as a cumulative effect of accounting change of
$135.6 million, net of applicable taxes, related to the
impairment of goodwill in its
24
North America cemetery reporting unit. For more information
regarding goodwill, see note nine to SCIs annual financial
statements included in this prospectus.
The selected historical financial data below should be read in
conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and with
SCIs annual financial statements and related notes
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except per share data) | |
Statement of operations data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
2,463.9 |
|
|
$ |
2,293.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,313.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,831.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,715.7 |
|
|
$ |
879.3 |
|
|
$ |
873.1 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
313.4 |
|
|
|
356.8 |
|
|
|
356.2 |
|
|
|
330.0 |
|
|
|
298.1 |
|
|
|
170.8 |
|
|
|
170.7 |
|
Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions net
|
|
|
(480.2 |
) |
|
|
(163.1 |
) |
|
|
50.7 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
|
|
|
(26.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
(198.2 |
) |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
219.8 |
|
|
|
224.9 |
|
|
|
187.2 |
|
|
|
127.4 |
|
|
|
120.4 |
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(391.5 |
) |
|
|
(129.4 |
) |
|
|
95.7 |
|
|
|
112.0 |
|
|
|
88.7 |
|
|
|
69.3 |
|
|
|
83.9 |
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before cumulative
effect of accounting changes
|
|
|
(433.9 |
) |
|
|
(90.1 |
) |
|
|
69.3 |
|
|
|
119.7 |
|
|
|
55.5 |
|
|
|
42.2 |
|
|
|
52.6 |
|
Basic (loss) income per share from continuing operations
|
|
|
(1.52 |
) |
|
|
(0.31 |
) |
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
Diluted (loss) income per share from continuing operations
|
|
|
(1.52 |
) |
|
|
(0.31 |
) |
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
Cash dividends paid per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.075 |
|
|
|
0.025 |
|
|
|
0.050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of | |
|
|
As of December 31, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Balance sheet data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
9,029.3 |
|
|
$ |
7,801.8 |
|
|
$ |
7,571.2 |
|
|
$ |
8,227.2 |
|
|
$ |
7,544.8 |
|
|
$ |
7,670.7 |
|
Total long-term debt less current maturities
|
|
|
2,312.4 |
|
|
|
1,885.2 |
|
|
|
1,530.1 |
|
|
|
1,200.4 |
|
|
|
1,186.5 |
|
|
|
1,265.3 |
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,451.7 |
|
|
|
1,318.9 |
|
|
|
1,516.3 |
|
|
|
1,843.0 |
|
|
|
1,581.6 |
|
|
|
1,608.9 |
|
25
See note two to SCIs annual financial statements and note
two to SCIs interim financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus for details related to the
restatement impacts on the financial statements as of
December 31, 2005 and 2004, and for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2005 and the six months
ended June 30, 2005. The impacts on the selected financial
data as of December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, and for each
of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2002 are
as follows (in millions, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
As Previously | |
|
|
|
As Previously | |
|
|
|
|
Reported | |
|
As Restated | |
|
Reported | |
|
As Restated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Loss from continuing operations before cumulative effect of
accounting changes
|
|
$ |
(89.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(90.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(433.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(433.9 |
) |
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(234.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(235.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(622.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(622.7 |
) |
Loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before cumulative effect of
accounting changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
(0.30 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.31 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.52 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.52 |
) |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.30 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.31 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.52 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.52 |
) |
Total assets
|
|
$ |
7,793.1 |
|
|
$ |
7,801.8 |
|
|
$ |
9,020.5 |
|
|
$ |
9,029.3 |
|
Long-term debt, less current maturities
|
|
$ |
1,874.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,885.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,301.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,312.4 |
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
1,321.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,318.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,453.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,451.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
As Previously | |
|
|
|
|
Reported | |
|
As Restated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Total assets
|
|
$ |
7,562.9 |
|
|
$ |
7,571.2 |
|
Long-term debt, less current maturities
|
|
$ |
1,519.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,530.1 |
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
1,521.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,516.3 |
|
26
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF ALDERWOODS
As described in Business History, on
January 2, 2002, Alderwoods succeeded to substantially all
of the assets and operations of Loewen Group pursuant to its
bankruptcy reorganization plan. The consolidated financial and
other information of Alderwoods issued subsequent to the
reorganization are not comparable with the consolidated
financial information and other information issued by Loewen
Group prior to the reorganization due to, among other things,
the significant changes in the financial and legal structure of
Alderwoods and the application of fresh start
reporting in connection with the reorganization. Accordingly,
the accompanying consolidated financial information should be
reviewed with caution, and Loewen Groups consolidated
financial information should not be relied upon as being
indicative of future results of Alderwoods or providing an
accurate comparison of financial performance. A black line has
been drawn to separate and distinguish between the consolidated
financial information that relates to Alderwoods and the
consolidated financial information that relates to Loewen Group,
the predecessor company for accounting purposes.
The selected historical financial data set forth below as of
January 1 and December 31, 2005 and for the
fifty-three weeks ended January 3, 2004, the fifty-two
weeks ended January 1, 2005, and the fifty-two weeks ended
December 31, 2005, have been derived from Alderwoods
annual financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus. The selected historical financial data set forth
below as of December 31, 2001 and for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2001 for Loewen Group has been derived from
annual financial statements that are not included in this
prospectus. Also, the selected historical financial data as of
December 28, 2002 and January 3, 2004, the fifty-two
weeks ended December 28, 2002 and the fifty-three weeks
ended January 3, 2004 for Alderwoods has been derived from
annual financial statements that are not included in this
prospectus.
The historical information for the twenty-four weeks ended
June 17, 2006 and June 18, 2005 has been derived from
Alderwoods interim financial statements, included
elsewhere in this prospectus which, in the opinion of
management, include all adjustments necessary for a fair
presentation of that information for such periods. The financial
information presented for the interim periods has been prepared
on a basis consistent with the accounting policies of Alderwoods
described elsewhere in this prospectus and should be read in
conjunction therewith. The results of operations for interim
periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may
be expected for the full fiscal year or for any other interim
period.
27
The selected historical financial data below should be read in
conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and with
Alderwoods consolidated financial statements and related notes
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alderwoods Group | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Predecessor(g) | |
|
52 Weeks Ended | |
|
53 Weeks Ended | |
|
52 Weeks Ended | |
|
52 Weeks Ended | |
|
24 Weeks Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 28, | |
|
January 3, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
June 18, | |
|
June 17, | |
|
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except per share data) | |
Statement of operations data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
836.4 |
|
|
$ |
692.4 |
|
|
$ |
720.8 |
|
|
$ |
717.1 |
|
|
$ |
748.9 |
|
|
$ |
360.7 |
|
|
$ |
354.3 |
|
Gross profit(a)
|
|
|
181.2 |
|
|
|
126.2 |
|
|
|
143.9 |
|
|
|
124.9 |
|
|
|
114.5 |
|
|
|
64.5 |
|
|
|
58.9 |
|
Provision for goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(228.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Provision) benefit for asset impairment(b)
|
|
|
(180.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
(132.2 |
) |
|
|
(145.8 |
) |
|
|
82.4 |
|
|
|
71.9 |
|
|
|
73.1 |
|
|
|
53.8 |
|
|
|
26.3 |
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations(c)
|
|
|
(87.2 |
) |
|
|
(223.6 |
) |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
42.9 |
|
|
|
26.9 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(643.7 |
) |
|
|
(233.7 |
) |
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
41.2 |
|
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
Basic (loss) income per share from continuing operations(d)
|
|
|
(1.29 |
) |
|
|
(5.60 |
) |
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
1.06 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
Diluted (loss) income per share from continuing operations
|
|
|
(1.29 |
) |
|
|
(5.60 |
) |
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
1.03 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets(e)(f)
|
|
$ |
2,874.1 |
|
|
$ |
2,553.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,453.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,372.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,274.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,280.8 |
|
Total long-term debt including current maturities
|
|
|
831.2 |
|
|
|
756.1 |
|
|
|
630.9 |
|
|
|
463.6 |
|
|
|
373.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358.2 |
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
739.4 |
|
|
|
523.4 |
|
|
|
544.9 |
|
|
|
555.9 |
|
|
|
597.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
598.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
For the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005, the
52 weeks ended January 1, 2005, the 53 weeks
ended January 3, 2004, and the 52 weeks ended
December 28, 2002, gross profit includes depreciation
expense not included in the year ended December 31, 2001. |
|
(b) |
Predecessor provision for asset impairment includes goodwill
impairment as determined under the Financial Accounting
Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed
Of. |
|
(c) |
For the Predecessor, represents loss before extraordinary gain,
fresh start valuation adjustments and cumulative effect of
accounting change. |
|
(d) |
For the Predecessor, represents basic loss per share before
extraordinary gain, fresh start valuation adjustments and
cumulative effect of accounting change. Predecessor loss per
share amounts are included herein, as required by U.S. GAAP.
However, the common stockholders of the Predecessor received no
equity in Alderwoods upon reorganization. |
|
(e) |
Alderwoods elected to adopt FIN No. 46R at the
beginning of the 2004 fiscal year on January 4, 2004. The
adoption of FIN No. 46R resulted in the consolidation
in Alderwoods balance sheet of the funeral, cemetery
merchandise and service, and perpetual care trusts, and several
pooled investment funds created for such trusts, but did not
change the legal relationships among these trusts, pooled
investment funds, Alderwoods, and its holders of preneed
contracts. Alderwoods does not consolidate certain funeral
trusts for which it does not absorb a majority of their expected
losses and therefore, is not considered a primary beneficiary of
these funeral trusts under FIN No. 46R. The adoption
of FIN No. 46R has not materially impacted
Alderwoods stockholders equity, net income or its
consolidated statement of cash flows. Amounts and balances prior
to January 4, 2004 have not been restated to reflect the
adoption of FIN No. 46R. |
28
|
|
(f) |
Alderwoods changed its accounting policy on accounting for
insurance funded preneed funeral contracts as of January 4,
2004, as Alderwoods concluded that its insurance funded preneed
funeral contracts are not assets and liabilities as defined by
Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 6
Elements in Financial Statements.
Accordingly, Alderwoods retroactively removed from its
consolidated balance sheet amounts relating to insurance funded
preneed funeral contracts previously included in preneed funeral
contracts with an equal and offsetting amount in deferred
preneed funeral contract revenue. The removal of insurance
funded preneed funeral contracts did not have any impact on
Alderwoods results of operations, consolidated
stockholders equity, or cash flows. |
|
|
(g) |
The financial results of the Loewen Group, the Predecessor, for
the year ended December 31, 2001, include $87 million
of pretax charges representing reorganization costs. The 2001
results exclude $133 million of contractual interest
expense applicable to certain pre-Petition Date debt
obligations, which were subject to compromise as a result of the
Chapter 11 and Creditors Arrangement Act filings. |
29
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
On April 2, 2006, SCI entered into a definitive merger
agreement pursuant to which, subject to the terms and conditions
set forth therein, it will acquire Alderwoods for
$20.00 per share in cash, resulting in a total purchase
price of approximately $1.2 billion, which includes the
refinancing of approximately $351.7 million and the
assumption of $6.5 million of Alderwoods debt.
The following financing transactions will occur in connection
with the closing of the acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
borrowings under a new $450 million senior credit facility,
consisting of a $150 million
3-year term loan, all
of which will be borrowed in connection with the transactions,
and a $300 million 5-year revolving credit facility, none
of which is expected to be drawn in connection with the
acquisition based on expected cash balances at closing; |
|
|
|
the issuance of $200 million of debt securities in a
private placement; and |
|
|
|
the issuance of $500 million of notes offered in a private
placement. |
In connection with the acquisition, Alderwoods and SCI have each
commenced tender offers to purchase outstanding notes. The
tender offers were originally scheduled to expire on
October 5, 2006, but have been extended to October 26,
2006, to coincide with the anticipated closing of the
acquisition. The tender offers may be further extended if the
closing date of the acquisition is later than October 26,
2006.
SCI expects to execute a consent order with the staff of the FTC
in connection with the acquisition, which will identify certain
properties the FTC will require us to divest as a result of the
acquisition. The consent order will be subject to approval by
the FTC commissioners, which approval is a condition to the
consummation of the acquisition. No final agreement has been
reached with any third party concerning the sale of any such
assets. We believe that divestiture of the assets, together with
the divestiture of other SCI assets that we have identified for
sale, will generate proceeds of approximately $200 million
in the near future, which we expect to use to repay debt. There
can be no assurance that the divestitures described above will
be consummated, or if consummated will generate the proceeds
described above.
The following unaudited pro forma combined financial information
is based on SCIs and Alderwoods annual and interim
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus
adjusted to illustrate the pro forma effect of the transactions.
The unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet gives effect to
the transactions as if they had occurred on June 30, 2006.
The unaudited pro forma combined statements of operations for
the year ended December 31, 2005, and for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 give effect to the
transactions as if they had occurred on January 1, 2005.
For purposes of the pro forma information in this prospectus,
the assets to be sold pursuant to the divestitures have been
reclassified on the pro forma balance sheet as assets held for
sales and the results of operations of these assets have been
eliminated from the pro forma statement of operations. No pro
forma adjustments have been made to reflect any anticipated gain
or loss from the divestitures and no adjustment has been made to
reflect any earnings benefit from the reinvestment of any
proceeds from the divestiture or any reduction of debt from the
application of sale proceeds.
The unaudited pro forma adjustments are based upon currently
available information and certain assumptions that we believe to
be reasonable under the circumstances. The acquisition will be
accounted for, and the pro forma combined financial information
has been prepared, using the purchase method of accounting. The
pro forma adjustments reflect our preliminary estimates of the
purchase price allocation, which are subject to revision as more
detailed analysis is completed and additional information on the
fair value of Alderwoods assets and liabilities becomes
available. The final allocation will be based on the actual
assets and liabilities that exist as of the date of the
consummation of the transactions.
30
The unaudited pro forma combined financial information does not
give effect to certain additional cost savings initiatives that
we intend to pursue. See Summary Planned
Divestitures and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Expected Cost Savings Resulting from the
Alderwoods Acquisition.
The unaudited pro forma combined financial information is for
informational purposes only and is not intended to represent the
consolidated results of operations or financial position that we
would have reported had the transactions been completed as of
the dates presented, and should not be taken as representative
of our future consolidated results of operations or financial
position.
The unaudited pro forma combined financial information should be
read in conjunction with the information contained in
Selected Historical Financial Information of SCI,
Selected Historical Financial Information of
Alderwoods, Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,
and the consolidated financial statements of SCI and Alderwoods
and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.
31
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
As of June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
|
|
|
SCI | |
|
Alderwoods | |
|
for the | |
|
for the | |
|
for the | |
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
Historical(a) | |
|
Acquisition | |
|
Divestitures(l) | |
|
Financing | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
ASSETS |
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
529,171 |
|
|
$ |
8,400 |
|
|
$ |
(876,650 |
)(b) |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
339,070 |
(m) |
|
$ |
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
|
62,439 |
|
|
|
51,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,023 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,660 |
|
Inventories
|
|
|
64,938 |
|
|
|
15,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,223 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,997 |
|
Current assets held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,298 |
|
Other
|
|
|
30,847 |
|
|
|
8,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
687,395 |
|
|
|
83,251 |
|
|
|
(876,650 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
339,070 |
|
|
|
233,066 |
|
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
1,227,144 |
|
|
|
338,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62,466 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,502,730 |
|
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
1,285,832 |
|
|
|
301,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(143,584 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,443,869 |
|
Cemetery property, at cost
|
|
|
1,365,712 |
|
|
|
116,096 |
|
|
|
108,904 |
(c) |
|
|
(94,981 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,495,731 |
|
Property and equipment, at cost, net
|
|
|
1,038,990 |
|
|
|
540,954 |
|
|
|
78,095 |
(d) |
|
|
(73,709 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,584,330 |
|
Insurance invested assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298,392 |
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
496,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
496,559 |
|
Deferred charges and other assets
|
|
|
253,727 |
|
|
|
42,600 |
|
|
|
5,630 |
(e) |
|
|
(16,747 |
) |
|
|
7,016 |
(n) |
|
|
292,226 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,930 |
|
|
|
167,795 |
(f) |
|
|
(9,421 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
178,304 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,118,119 |
|
|
|
295,913 |
|
|
|
(50,494 |
)(g) |
|
|
(22,691 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340,847 |
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments
|
|
|
693,781 |
|
|
|
243,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72,960 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
864,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
7,670,700 |
|
|
$ |
2,280,789 |
|
|
$ |
(566,720 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
346,086 |
|
|
$ |
9,730,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$ |
196,977 |
|
|
$ |
113,984 |
|
|
$ |
19,560 |
(g)(1) |
|
$ |
(2,177 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
328,344 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
30,414 |
|
|
|
2,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,677 |
|
Current liabilities held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,185 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
21,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
248,405 |
|
|
|
116,255 |
|
|
|
19,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384,220 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,265,263 |
|
|
|
355,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,528 |
) |
|
|
393,678 |
(o) |
|
|
2,001,371 |
|
Deferred preneed funeral revenues
|
|
|
539,178 |
|
|
|
44,517 |
|
|
|
(28,422 |
)(g)(1) |
|
|
(14,802 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
540,471 |
|
Deferred preneed cemetery revenues
|
|
|
777,717 |
|
|
|
31,313 |
|
|
|
73,390 |
(h) |
|
|
(58,449 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
823,971 |
|
Insurance policy liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285,701 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
168,925 |
|
|
|
10,744 |
|
|
|
(29,348 |
)(i) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,526 |
)(p) |
|
|
132,795 |
|
Liabilities held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
347,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
347,481 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
315,403 |
|
|
|
28,471 |
|
|
|
(3,738 |
)(j) |
|
|
(766 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
339,370 |
|
Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts
|
|
|
2,055,566 |
|
|
|
564,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(186,807 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,433,206 |
|
Non-controlling interest in cemetery perpetual care trust
investments
|
|
|
691,385 |
|
|
|
245,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73,129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
863,477 |
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,608,858 |
|
|
|
598,162 |
|
|
|
(598,162 |
)(k) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,066 |
)(q) |
|
|
1,578,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
7,670,700 |
|
|
$ |
2,280,789 |
|
|
$ |
(566,720 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
346,086 |
|
|
$ |
9,730,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance
sheet.
32
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED BALANCE
SHEET
|
|
(a) |
Reflects the unaudited consolidated balance sheet of Alderwoods
as of June 17, 2006. Certain line items have been
reclassified to conform to SCIs presentation. |
|
(b) |
Represents the cash purchase price plus SCI acquisition costs. |
|
(c) |
Represents an adjustment to report Alderwoods cemetery property
at fair value as part of purchase accounting. The estimated fair
value of Alderwoods cemetery property was $225,000 at
June 17, 2006, calculated using discounted future cash
flows. The carrying value of Alderwoods cemetery property was
$116,096 at June 17, 2006, resulting in a total increase to
cemetery property of $108,904. |
|
(d) |
Represents an adjustment to report Alderwoods property and
equipment at fair value as part of purchase accounting. The
estimated fair value of Alderwoods property and equipment was
$619,049 at June 17, 2006, calculated using discounted
future cash flows. The carrying value of Alderwoods property and
equipment was $540,954 at June 17, 2006, resulting in a
total increase to property and equipment of $78,095. |
|
(e) |
Represents an adjustment to conform Alderwoods accounting for
the recognition of sales of undeveloped cemetery property with
SCIs historical accounting policy. Deferred cemetery
revenue was increased by $6,951 and deferred charges and other
assets was increased by $5,630. See note (g)(2) and (h). |
|
|
(f) |
Represents the additional intangible assets or adjustments to
intangible assets to be recorded as a result of the acquisition,
consisting of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks and tradenames(1)
|
|
$ |
39,500 |
|
Cemetery customer relationships(2)
|
|
|
16,400 |
|
Funeral trust preneed deferred revenue and insurance funded
preneed revenue(3)
|
|
|
61,213 |
|
Cemetery preneed deferred revenue(4)
|
|
|
46,033 |
|
Water rights
|
|
|
5,500 |
|
Adjustment to fair value of insurance subsidiarys in force
insurance policies
|
|
|
(851 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
167,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents the estimated value of various local trademarks and
tradenames associated with funeral and cemetery locations. |
|
|
(2) |
Represents the estimated value of future funeral services and
cemetery services derived from existing cemetery customers. |
|
|
(3) |
Represents the amount necessary to adjust preneed funeral trust
deferred revenue for certain existing preneed funeral contracts,
and insurance funded contracts to their estimated fair value. |
|
|
(4) |
Represents the amount necessary to adjust preneed cemetery
deferred revenue for certain existing preneed cemetery contracts
to their estimated fair value. |
33
|
|
(g) |
Represents the elimination of previously recorded goodwill and
the addition of goodwill arising from the transaction. Goodwill
was determined as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity purchase price
|
|
$ |
856,300 |
|
Estimated SCI acquisition costs
|
|
|
20,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate purchase price
|
|
|
876,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of liabilities assumed(1)
|
|
|
1,714,069 |
|
Fair value of assets acquired(2)
|
|
|
(2,345,300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill arising from the transaction
|
|
|
245,419 |
|
Alderwoods historical goodwill
|
|
|
(295,913 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to goodwill
|
|
$ |
(50,494 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents the estimated fair value of liabilities assumed as
follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
Historical total liabilities
|
|
$ |
1,682,627 |
|
Adjustment to fair value preneed funeral deferred revenue
|
|
|
(28,422 |
) |
Adjustment to fair value preneed cemetery deferred revenue (See
note (h))
|
|
|
73,390 |
|
Adjustment to deferred income taxes (See note (i))
|
|
|
(29,348 |
) |
Adjustment to record certain severance obligations triggered by
change of control provisions
|
|
|
19,560 |
|
Adjustment to other liabilities (See note (j))
|
|
|
(3,738 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Fair value of liabilities assumed
|
|
$ |
1,714,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Represents the fair value of assets acquired as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
Historical total assets
|
|
$ |
2,280,789 |
|
Eliminate historical goodwill
|
|
|
(295,913 |
) |
Adjustment to conform recognition of sales of undeveloped
cemetery property (See note (e))
|
|
|
5,630 |
|
Adjustment to fair value cemetery property (See note (c))
|
|
|
108,904 |
|
Adjustment to fair value property and equipment (See
note (d))
|
|
|
78,095 |
|
Adjustment to fair value identifiable intangible assets (See
note (f))
|
|
|
167,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of assets assumed
|
|
$ |
2,345,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(h) |
The following represents adjustments to preneed cemetery
deferred revenue
arising as part of purchase accounting: |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to fair value preneed cemetery deferred revenue
|
|
$ |
66,439 |
|
Adjustment to conform recognition of sales of undeveloped
cemetery property (See note (e))
|
|
|
6,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to preneed cemetery deferred revenue
|
|
$ |
73,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) |
Represents an adjustment to deferred income tax liabilities as
part of purchase accounting as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes related to adjustments to the fair market value
of assets acquired and liabilities assumed (See notes (c), (d),
(e), (f), (g), (h) and (j))
|
|
$ |
122,190 |
|
Elimination of valuation allowances on certain federal and state
tax deferred tax assets based on the expected combined
operations of Alderwoods and SCI
|
|
|
(125,767 |
) |
Elimination of deferred taxes related to previously recorded
goodwill (See note (g))
|
|
|
(25,771 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(29,348 |
) |
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
(j) |
The following represents adjustments to other liabilities
arising as part of purchase accounting: |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to reclassify certain severance obligations
previously accrued
|
|
$ |
(5,643 |
) |
Adjustment to fair value pension liability
|
|
|
1,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to other liabilities
|
|
$ |
(3,738 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(k) |
Represents the elimination of Alderwoods historical equity
balances. |
|
|
(l) |
For purposes of the pro forma information in this prospectus,
the assets to be sold pursuant to the divestitures have been
reclassified on the pro forma balance sheet as assets held for
sale and the results of operations of these assets have been
eliminated from the pro forma statement of operations. No pro
forma adjustments have been made to reflect any anticipated gain
or loss from the divestitures and no adjustment has been made to
reflect any earnings benefit from the reinvestment of any
proceeds from the divestitures or any reduction of debt from the
application of sale proceeds. |
|
|
(m) |
Represents net cash provided as a result of the financing
transactions, offset by the use of cash to extinguish debt and
pay financing costs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts to be extinguished:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of existing Alderwoods indebtedness(1)
|
|
$ |
351,683 |
|
|
Repayment of SCI Senior Notes due 2009
|
|
|
144,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amounts to be extinguished
|
|
|
496,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing costs and transaction fees
|
|
|
19,875 |
|
|
Estimated tender premiums
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total amounts to be paid
|
|
$ |
541,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes offered in a private placement
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
Credit facility
|
|
|
180,128 |
|
|
Privately placed debt securities
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total sources of cash
|
|
|
880,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash provided
|
|
$ |
339,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Excludes $6,546 of existing Alderwoods debt expected to be
assumed by SCI. |
|
|
(n) |
Represents the adjustment to deferred charges and other assets
as set forth in the table below: |
|
|
|
|
|
Write-off of Alderwoods deferred financing costs for
extinguished debt
|
|
$ |
(7,125 |
) |
Write-off of SCIs deferred financing costs for
extinguished debt
|
|
|
(1,459 |
) |
Financing costs
|
|
|
15,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustment to deferred charges and other assets
|
|
$ |
7,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
(o) |
Represents the increase in long-term debt as set forth in the
table below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts to be extinguished:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Existing Alderwoods debt
|
|
$ |
351,683 |
|
|
Existing SCI debt
|
|
|
134,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total amounts to be extinguished
|
|
|
486,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes offered in a private placement
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
Credit facility
|
|
|
180,128 |
|
|
Privately placed notes
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt issuance
|
|
|
880,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustment to long-term debt
|
|
$ |
393,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(p) |
Represents the tax benefit related to the adjustments to
stockholders equity for non-recurring charges directly
attributable to the financing transactions (see note (q)). |
|
(q) |
The following are the adjustments to stockholders equity
related to non-recurring charges directly attributable to the
financing transactions that will occur in connection with the
closing of the acquisition: |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated tender premiums
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
Transaction fees
|
|
|
4,275 |
|
Write-off of SCIs original issuance discount for
extinguished debt
|
|
|
9,733 |
|
Write-off of Alderwoods deferred financing fees for
extinguished debt
|
|
|
7,125 |
|
Write-off of SCIs deferred financing fees for extinguished
debt
|
|
|
1,459 |
|
Tax benefit
|
|
|
(17,526 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
36
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alderwoods | |
|
for the | |
|
for the | |
|
for the | |
|
|
|
|
SCI Historical | |
|
Historical(a) | |
|
Acquisition | |
|
Divestitures(g) | |
|
Financing | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
1,715,737 |
|
|
$ |
748,914 |
|
|
$ |
(5,025 |
)(b) |
|
$ |
(94,251 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,365,375 |
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(1,417,592 |
) |
|
|
(634,395 |
) |
|
|
(7,649 |
)(c) |
|
|
81,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,978,351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
298,145 |
|
|
|
114,519 |
|
|
|
(12,674 |
) |
|
|
(12,966 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
387,024 |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(84,834 |
) |
|
|
(42,815 |
) |
|
|
7,751 |
(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(119,898 |
) |
Gains (loss) on dispositions and impairment charges, net
|
|
|
(26,093 |
) |
|
|
1,379 |
|
|
|
4,964 |
(e) |
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
187,218 |
|
|
|
73,083 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(12,565 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,777 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(103,733 |
) |
|
|
(30,069 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
(25,248 |
)(i) |
|
|
(158,355 |
) |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(14,258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,258 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
16,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,706 |
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
2,774 |
|
|
|
4,662 |
|
|
|
(4,964 |
)(e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
88,707 |
|
|
|
47,676 |
|
|
|
(4,923 |
) |
|
|
(11,870 |
) |
|
|
(25,248 |
) |
|
|
94,342 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(33,233 |
) |
|
|
(4,815 |
) |
|
|
(12,256 |
)(f) |
|
|
4,638 |
(h) |
|
|
9,250 |
(j) |
|
|
(36,416 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
55,474 |
|
|
$ |
42,861 |
|
|
$ |
(17,179 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,232 |
) |
|
$ |
15,998 |
|
|
$ |
57,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
Average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
302,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
302,213 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
306,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306,745 |
|
See notes to unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of
operations.
37
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
|
|
|
SCI | |
|
Alderwoods | |
|
for the | |
|
for the | |
|
for the | |
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
Historical(a) | |
|
Acquisition | |
|
Divestitures(g) | |
|
Financing | |
|
Pro forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
879,284 |
|
|
$ |
360,663 |
|
|
$ |
(3,776 |
)(b) |
|
$ |
(45,961 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,190,210 |
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(708,440 |
) |
|
|
(296,171 |
) |
|
|
(3,484 |
)(c) |
|
|
39,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(968,989 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
170,844 |
|
|
|
64,492 |
|
|
|
(7,260 |
) |
|
|
(6,855 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
221,221 |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(42,192 |
) |
|
|
(12,346 |
) |
|
|
3,866 |
(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,672 |
) |
Gain (loss) on dispositions and impairment charges, net
|
|
|
(1,213 |
) |
|
|
1,627 |
|
|
|
5,447 |
(e) |
|
|
(450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
127,439 |
|
|
|
53,773 |
|
|
|
2,053 |
|
|
|
(7,305 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,960 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(51,229 |
) |
|
|
(14,528 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
(13,391 |
)(i) |
|
|
(78,785 |
) |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(14,258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,258 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
7,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,950 |
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(637 |
) |
|
|
5,843 |
|
|
|
(5,447 |
)(e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
69,265 |
|
|
|
45,088 |
|
|
|
(3,394 |
) |
|
|
(6,942 |
) |
|
|
(13,391 |
) |
|
|
90,626 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(27,073 |
) |
|
|
(18,193 |
) |
|
|
1,592 |
(f) |
|
|
2,716 |
(h) |
|
|
4,907 |
(j) |
|
|
(36,051 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
42,192 |
|
|
$ |
26,895 |
|
|
$ |
(1,802 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,226 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,484 |
) |
|
$ |
54,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
Average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
307,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
307,896 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
311,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
311,986 |
|
See notes to unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of
operations.
38
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alderwoods | |
|
for the | |
|
for the | |
|
for the | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical(a) | |
|
Acquisition | |
|
Divestitures(g) | |
|
Financing | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
SCI Historical | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
873,143 |
|
|
$ |
354,261 |
|
|
$ |
(531 |
)(b) |
|
$ |
(46,028 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,180,845 |
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(702,399 |
) |
|
|
(295,410 |
) |
|
|
(2,495 |
)(c) |
|
|
38,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(961,343 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
170,744 |
|
|
|
58,851 |
|
|
|
(3,026 |
) |
|
|
(7,067 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
219,502 |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(42,929 |
) |
|
|
(32,557 |
) |
|
|
5,118 |
(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70,368 |
) |
Gain (loss) on dispositions and impairment charges, net
|
|
|
(7,391 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80 |
)(e) |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,570 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
120,424 |
|
|
|
26,294 |
|
|
|
2,012 |
|
|
|
(7,166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,564 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(53,337 |
) |
|
|
(12,949 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
(14,337 |
)(i) |
|
|
(80,245 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
12,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,763 |
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
4,046 |
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
80 |
(e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
83,896 |
|
|
|
13,216 |
|
|
|
2,092 |
|
|
|
(6,788 |
) |
|
|
(14,337 |
) |
|
|
78,079 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(31,282 |
) |
|
|
(7,318 |
) |
|
|
285 |
(f) |
|
|
2,685 |
(h) |
|
|
5,253 |
(j) |
|
|
(30,377 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
52,614 |
|
|
$ |
5,898 |
|
|
$ |
2,377 |
|
|
$ |
(4,103 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,084 |
) |
|
$ |
47,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
Average Common Shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
293,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293,580 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
297,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297,784 |
|
See notes to unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of
operations.
39
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS
|
|
(a) |
Alderwoods historical information is derived from: (1) the
audited consolidated statement of operations for the fifty-two
weeks ended December 31, 2005; (2) the unaudited
consolidated statement of operations for the twenty-four weeks
ended June 18, 2005; and (3) the unaudited
consolidated statement of operations for the twenty-four weeks
ended June 17, 2006. Certain of Alderwoods line items
have been reclassified to conform to SCIs presentation. |
|
(b) |
The table below sets forth adjustments to revenue arising from
the acquisition: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months | |
|
Six Months | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Preneed funeral contracts(1)
|
|
|
(5,754 |
) |
|
|
(2,766 |
) |
|
|
(3,188 |
) |
Preneed cemetery contracts(2)
|
|
|
1,521 |
|
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
Cemetery revenue from the sale of unconstructed property(3)
|
|
|
(792 |
) |
|
|
(1,674 |
) |
|
|
1,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to revenue
|
|
$ |
(5,025 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,776 |
) |
|
$ |
(531 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents a net adjustment for the amortization of (i) the
associated intangible asset, and (ii) the fair value
adjustment to funeral trust funded preneed deferred revenue. |
|
|
(2) |
Represents a net adjustment for the amortization of (i) the
associated intangible asset, and (ii) the fair value
adjustment to cemetery preneed deferred revenue. |
|
|
(3) |
Represents an adjustment to conform Alderwoods accounting for
the recognition of sales of undeveloped cemetery property with
SCIs historical accounting policy. |
|
|
(c) |
The table below sets forth adjustments to costs and expenses
arising from the acquisition: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months | |
|
Six Months | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Depreciation expense(1)
|
|
$ |
6,684 |
|
|
$ |
3,271 |
|
|
$ |
3,726 |
|
Intangible amortization expense(2)
|
|
|
(3,910 |
) |
|
|
(1,955 |
) |
|
|
(1,955 |
) |
Pension expense(3)
|
|
|
(415 |
) |
|
|
(208 |
) |
|
|
47 |
|
Cemetery costs from the sale of unconstructed property(4)
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
(600 |
) |
Cemetery property cost of sales(5)
|
|
|
(9,941 |
) |
|
|
(5,026 |
) |
|
|
(3,713 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to costs and expenses
|
|
$ |
(7,649 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,484 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,495 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents a net adjustment to record depreciation expense over
a weighted average estimated remaining useful life of
30 years, reflecting the adjusted fair value of
Alderwoods property and equipment. |
|
|
(2) |
Represents an adjustment to record the amortization of
intangible assets recorded as a result of the acquisition. The
cemetery customer relationships and the funeral insurance funded
preneed revenue are being amortized over an estimated useful
life of ten years. The trademark, tradename, water rights
and insurance in force intangibles are considered to have an
indefinite life and are not subject to amortization; rather,
such assets would be subject to annual tests for impairment. The
intangible assets associated with funeral trust funded preneed
deferred revenue and cemetery preneed deferred revenue are
amortized relative to the recognition of preneed revenue and
included in note (b(1)) and (b(2)). |
40
|
|
|
|
(3) |
Represents a net adjustment to conform Alderwoods
accounting policy for gains and losses on its pension plan
assets and obligations to SCIs historical accounting
policy. |
|
|
(4) |
Represents an adjustment to conform Alderwoods accounting
for the recognition of sales of undeveloped cemetery property
with SCIs historical accounting policy. |
|
|
(5) |
Represents a net adjustment to record cemetery property cost of
sales at the adjusted fair value of Alderwoods cemetery property. |
|
|
(d) |
Represents an adjustment to eliminate compensation expense for
certain officers for whom severance costs have been recorded on
the pro forma balance sheet. |
|
(e) |
Represents the reclassification of gains and losses from
dispositions to conform to SCIs historical presentation. |
|
|
(f) |
The pro forma adjustments to income tax reflect the statutory
federal, state and foreign income tax impact of the pro forma
adjustments related to the Alderwoods acquisition (see notes
(b), (c), (d) and (e)) and the effects of purchase accounting. |
|
|
(g) |
For purposes of the pro forma information in this prospectus,
the assets to be sold pursuant to the divestitures have been
reclassified on the pro forma balance sheet as assets held for
sale and the results of operations of these assets have been
eliminated from the pro forma statement of operations. No pro
forma adjustments have been made to reflect any anticipated gain
or loss from the divestitures and no adjustment has been made to
reflect any earnings benefit from the reinvestment of any
proceeds from the divestitures or any reduction of debt from the
application of sale proceeds. |
|
(h) |
Represents the statutory federal, and state income tax impact
attributable to the operations to be divested. |
|
|
(i) |
The table below sets forth adjustments to interest expense
resulting from the extinguishment of debt and issuance of new
debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months | |
|
Six Months | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Interest expense on new borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes due 2014 offered hereby(1)
|
|
$ |
18,438 |
|
|
$ |
9,219 |
|
|
$ |
9,219 |
|
|
Senior notes due 2018 offered hereby(2)
|
|
|
19,063 |
|
|
|
9,531 |
|
|
|
9,531 |
|
|
New senior credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan(3)
|
|
|
11,100 |
|
|
|
5,550 |
|
|
|
5,550 |
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility(4)
|
|
|
2,227 |
|
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
Private placement debt securities(5)
|
|
|
14,800 |
|
|
|
7,400 |
|
|
|
7,400 |
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs(6)
|
|
$ |
1,843 |
|
|
$ |
902 |
|
|
$ |
975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense on new borrowings
|
|
$ |
67,471 |
|
|
$ |
33,716 |
|
|
$ |
33,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: historical interest expense and related amortization of
deferred financing costs on extinguished borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alderwoods
|
|
$ |
29,221 |
|
|
$ |
13,824 |
|
|
$ |
12,951 |
|
|
SCI
|
|
|
13,002 |
|
|
|
6,501 |
|
|
|
6,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total historical interest expense and related amortization of
deferred financing costs on extinguished borrowings
|
|
$ |
42,223 |
|
|
$ |
20,325 |
|
|
$ |
19,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to interest expense
|
|
$ |
25,248 |
|
|
$ |
13,391 |
|
|
$ |
14,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents interest on our new senior notes due 2014, which is
calculated as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months | |
|
Six Months | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding balance
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
Interest rate
|
|
|
7.375 |
% |
|
|
7.375 |
% |
|
|
7.375 |
% |
Portion of year outstanding
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculated interest
|
|
$ |
18,438 |
|
|
$ |
9,219 |
|
|
$ |
9,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Represents interest on our new senior notes due 2018, which is
calculated as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months | |
|
Six Months | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding balance
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
Interest rate
|
|
|
7.625 |
% |
|
|
7.625 |
% |
|
|
7.625 |
% |
Portion of year outstanding
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculated interest
|
|
$ |
19,063 |
|
|
$ |
9,531 |
|
|
$ |
9,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
Represents interest on our new term loan, which is calculated as
follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months | |
|
Six Months | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Estimated outstanding balance
|
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
Assumed interest rate-3 month LIBOR (5.4% on September 13,
2006) plus 2.00%
|
|
|
7.40 |
% |
|
|
7.40 |
% |
|
|
7.40 |
% |
Portion of year outstanding
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculated interest
|
|
$ |
11,100 |
|
|
$ |
5,550 |
|
|
$ |
5,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An increase or decrease of 25 basis points in interest rate
would result in an interest expense increase or decrease of
|
|
$ |
375 |
|
|
$ |
188 |
|
|
$ |
188 |
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
Represents interest on our new revolving facility, which is
calculated as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months | |
|
Six Months | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Estimated outstanding balance
|
|
$ |
30,100 |
|
|
$ |
30,100 |
|
|
$ |
30,100 |
|
Assumed interest rate-3 month LIBOR (5.4% on September 13,
2006) plus 2.00%
|
|
|
7.40 |
% |
|
|
7.40 |
% |
|
|
7.40 |
% |
Portion of year outstanding
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculated interest
|
|
$ |
2,227 |
|
|
$ |
1,114 |
|
|
$ |
1,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An increase or decrease of 25 basis points in interest rate
would result in an interest expense increase or decrease of
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
42
|
|
|
|
(5) |
Represents interest on our private placement debt securities,
which is calculated as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months | |
|
Six Months | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Estimated outstanding balance
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
Assumed interest rate-3 month LIBOR (5.4% on September 13,
2006) plus 2.00%
|
|
|
7.40 |
% |
|
|
7.40 |
% |
|
|
7.40 |
% |
Portion of year outstanding
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculated interest
|
|
$ |
14,800 |
|
|
$ |
7,400 |
|
|
$ |
7,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An increase or decrease of 25 basis points in interest rate
would result in an interest expense increase or decrease of
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
$ |
250 |
|
|
$ |
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
(6) |
Represents amortization of deferred financing costs over the
term of the new financing arrangements. |
|
|
(j) |
Represents the statutory federal, and state income tax impact of
the adjustment to interest expense (see note (h)). |
SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The supplementary data specified by Item 302 of
Regulation S-K as
it relates to SCIs quarterly data is included in
Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements of SCI
included in this prospectus. The supplementary data specified by
Item 302 of Regulation S-K as it relates to
Alderwoods quarterly data is included in Note 23 to
the consolidated financial statements of Alderwoods included in
this prospectus.
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES OF SCI
(In thousands, except ratio amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Ratio (earnings divided by fixed charges)
|
|
|
2.47 |
|
|
|
2.16 |
|
|
|
1.73 |
|
|
|
1.81 |
|
|
|
1.60 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. |
During the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, the
ratio coverage was less than 1:1. In order to achieve a coverage
of 1:1, the Company would have had to generate additional income
from continuing operations before income taxes and cumulative
effect of accounting changes of $128,922 and $393,356 for the
years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. |
43
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis should be read in
conjunction with and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to the consolidated financial statements and related notes of
SCI and Alderwoods included elsewhere in this prospectus. Except
for historical information, the discussion in this section
contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described in
the Risk factors section of this prospectus. Future
results could differ materially from those discussed below. See
the discussion under the caption Cautionary Statements
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.
On April 2, 2006, SCI executed a definitive merger
agreement pursuant to which, subject to the terms and conditions
set forth therein, it expects to acquire all outstanding shares
of Alderwoods Group, Inc., or Alderwoods. We refer to the
acquisition and the related transactions, including the issuance
of notes offered in a private placement, the issuance of debt
securities in a private placement, the borrowings under our new
senior credit facility, the repayment of certain existing
indebtedness of SCI and Alderwoods and the divestitures,
collectively as the transactions. The transactions
do not include the exchange offer that is the subject of this
prospectus. The following discussion and analysis of our
financial condition and results of operations covers periods
prior to the consummation of the acquisition. Accordingly, the
discussion and analysis of historical periods does not reflect
the significant impact that the acquisition will have on us,
including significantly increased leverage.
For purposes of this prospectus, unless the context otherwise
indicates or as otherwise indicated, the term:
|
|
|
|
|
SCI refers to Service Corporation International
and its subsidiaries prior to the acquisition; |
|
|
|
Alderwoods refers to the Alderwoods Group, Inc.
and its subsidiaries; and |
|
|
|
the Company, us, we,
our, or ours refer to SCI, together with
its subsidiaries, including Alderwoods, immediately after giving
effect to the transactions. |
Overview
We are North Americas leading provider of deathcare
products and services, with a network of funeral homes and
cemeteries unequalled in geographic scale and reach. We hold
leading positions in each of the U.S. and Canada and, giving pro
forma effect to the acquisition, we estimate that we represented
approximately 14% of the funeral and cemetery services business
in North America based on 2005 industry revenues, which was
approximately five times the share of our next largest North
American competitor.
On April 2, 2006, SCI entered into a definitive merger
agreement pursuant to which it expects to acquire Alderwoods for
$20.00 per share in cash, resulting in a total purchase
price of approximately $1.2 billion, which includes the
refinancing of approximately $351.7 million and the
assumption of $6.5 million of Alderwoods debt. Upon
completion of the acquisition, we intend to focus on the
near-term reduction of our outstanding indebtedness to our
long-term target levels. Through the application of operating
cash flow and proceeds from asset sales to retire pre-payable
debt, we expect to reduce our outstanding debt to approximately
$1.7 billion within the next several years.
Our strategy to deliver profitable growth is supported by three
structural components, and the acquisition of Alderwoods is
consistent with each of those components:
|
|
|
|
|
Approach business by customer category the
acquisition provides increased exposure to key demographic and
customer segments. |
|
|
|
Utilize scale and drive operating discipline the
acquisition provides additional economies of scale. |
|
|
|
Manage the footprint the acquisition provides an
increased presence across North America. |
44
We derive a majority of our revenues from the sale of funeral
related merchandise and services. Funeral merchandise includes
caskets, burial vaults, cremation receptacles, flowers, and
other ancillary products. Funeral services include preparation
and embalming, cremation, and the use of funeral facilities and
vehicles, as well as assisting customers with many of the legal
and administrative details related to funerals. Funeral revenues
also include revenues generated by our wholly owned subsidiary,
Kenyon International Emergency Services (Kenyon), which provides
disaster management services in mass fatality incidents.
Revenues and gross profits associated with Kenyon are subject to
significant variation due to the nature of its operations. On a
pro forma basis giving effect to the transactions, revenues
generated from the sale of funeral related merchandise and
services were $1.6 billion or 66.6% of total net revenues
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 and
$781.6 million or 66.2% of total net revenues for the six
months ended June 30, 2006. We sell a significant portion
of our funeral services on a preneed basis, whereby a customer
contractually agrees to the terms of a funeral to be performed
in the future. On a pro forma basis giving effect to the
transactions, approximately $463.3 million or 29.4% of our
total funeral revenues in the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005 and approximately $231.7 million or
29.6% of our total funeral revenues in the six months ended
June 30, 2006 were made on a preneed basis in prior periods.
We also generate revenue from the sale of cemetery related
property, merchandise and services. Our cemeteries sell cemetery
property interment rights including lots, mausoleum spaces, lawn
crypts, and spaces in cremation gardens. Our cemeteries also
perform interment services (primarily merchandise installation
and burial openings and closings) and provide management and
maintenance of cemetery grounds. Cemetery merchandise includes
items such as stone and bronze memorials, burial vaults, and
casket and cremation memorialization products. On a pro forma
basis giving effect to the transactions, revenues generated from
the sale of cemetery related property, merchandise, and services
were $695.2 million or 29.4% of total net revenues for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 and $353.0 million
or 29.9% of total net revenues for the six months ended
June 30, 2006. Cemetery sales are also often made on a
preneed basis. On a pro forma basis giving effect to the
transactions, approximately $360.4 million or 51.9% of our
total cemetery revenues in the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005 and approximately $176.9 million or
50.1% of our total cemetery revenues in the six months ended
June 30, 2006 were made on a preneed basis in prior periods.
Alderwoods insurance company sells a variety of insurance
products, primarily for the funding of preneed funerals. On a
pro forma basis giving effect to the transactions, revenues
generated from the sale of insurance products were
$95.0 million or 4.0% of total net revenues for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2005 and $46.3 million or 3.9%
of total net revenues for the six months ended June 30,
2006.
At June 30, 2006, on a pro forma basis giving effect to the
transactions, we owned and operated 1,438 funeral homes and
235 cemeteries in 46 states, eight Canadian provinces, the
District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. In 2005, on a pro forma
basis giving effect to the transactions, $2.3 billion or
99.5% of our net sales were generated in North America. With the
acquisition of Alderwoods, we gain entry into five new states in
the U.S. and assume the leading position in Canada. We plan to
continue to focus our growth in the future on building an
increased presence across North America.
At June 30, 2006, on a pro forma basis giving effect to the
transactions, we owned 243 funeral home/cemetery locations in
which a funeral home is physically located within or adjoining a
cemetery operation. Combination operations allow certain
facility, personnel and equipment costs to be shared between the
funeral home and cemetery. Combination locations also create
synergies between funeral and cemetery sales personnel and give
families added convenience to purchase both funeral and cemetery
products and services at a single location. With the acquisition
of Alderwoods, we will acquire Rose Hills, which is the largest
combination operation in the U.S., performing approximately
5,000 funerals and 9,000 interments per year.
We recognize sales of merchandise and services when the
merchandise is delivered or the service is performed. Sales of
cemetery interment rights are recognized when a minimum of 10%
of the sales price has been collected and the property has been
constructed or is available for interment.
45
Primary costs associated with our funeral service locations
include labor costs, facility costs, vehicle costs, and cost of
merchandise. Primary costs associated with our cemeteries
include labor costs, selling costs, cost of merchandise
(including cemetery property), and maintenance costs.
Expected Cost Savings Resulting from the Alderwoods
Acquisition
Based on current estimates and assumptions, we expect to achieve
significant cost savings and other synergies as a result of the
Alderwoods acquisition, principally through the elimination of
duplicate information technology systems and infrastructure,
duplicate accounting, finance, legal and other systems,
overlapping management, and duplicate executive and public
company costs, as well as through increased purchasing scale. We
expect that these cost savings will have significant effects on
our results of operations that are not reflected in the
unaudited pro forma combined financial information included in
this prospectus.
We have developed a detailed integration plan and established
integration teams of employees at both SCI and Alderwoods to
implement this plan after closing. These teams will work under
the direct supervision of integration leaders, which includes
several senior executives that have been designated with the
responsibility for developing and supervising the implementation
of the integration plan. We believe that the compatibility of
SCIs and Alderwoods systems and infrastructure will
help to minimize integration risk. For example, both companies
use the same
point-of-sale software.
Based on current estimates and assumptions, and excluding
one-time cash integration costs of approximately
$60 million (which does not include financing fees and
other related transaction costs), of which we expect to incur
approximately $30 to $35 million during 2006 and the
remainder during 2007, we expect to achieve annual pretax cost
savings of approximately $60 to $70 million within eighteen
months of closing the acquisition, with approximately
$15 million of such savings realized within twelve months
of closing. The amounts are measured relative to actual costs
incurred by Alderwoods in 2005. These estimated cost savings are
comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Annual | |
|
|
Cost Savings | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Duplicate systems and infrastructure(a)
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
Management structure duplication(b)
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
Public company and redundant corporate costs(c)
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
|
(a) |
Duplicate IT systems and administrative overhead. |
|
(b) |
Overlapping management and other management restructuring
initiatives. |
|
(c) |
Redundant director fees and expenses, auditor fees, finance,
accounting, human resources, and legal costs. |
In addition to the $60 to $70 million of cost savings
already identified, we believe there is potential for additional
cost saving synergies primarily in the areas of purchasing
(primarily caskets) and in the combined companys
management and sale structure approach.
The foregoing cost savings and synergies are based on estimates
and assumptions made by us that are inherently uncertain, though
considered reasonable by us. Our expected cost savings and
synergies are subject to significant business, economic and
competitive uncertainties and contingencies, all of which are
difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control.
As a result, there can be no assurance that any such
cost-savings or synergies will be achieved. See Risk
factors Risks Related to the Acquisition of
Alderwoods.
46
Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations
|
|
|
Acquisition of Alderwoods |
The acquisition of Alderwoods will have a significant impact on
our operations. In addition to the effect of including
Alderwoods business in our results after the acquisition
is completed, we expect to achieve significant cost-savings and
other synergies as a result of the Alderwoods acquisition. Based
on current estimates and assumptions, we expect to achieve
annual pretax cost savings of approximately $60 to
$70 million within eighteen months of closing. We will
incur one-time integration and other related costs of
approximately $60 million (which does not include financing
fees and other related transaction costs) of which we expect to
incur $30 to $35 million during 2006 and the remainder
during 2007. In connection with the acquisition and related
financings, we will incur estimated transaction costs of
$40.2 million. We will be more highly leveraged and after
giving effect to the transactions, our interest expense will
increase by approximately $30.4 million per year. See the
discussion above for further information regarding synergies and
costs associated with our acquisition of Alderwoods.
More than 70% of all deaths in the United States occur at
age 65 and older. In 2004 people aged 65 and older
constituted 12% of the population, according to the
U.S. Census Bureau; the U.S. Census Bureau projects
that by 2020 the number of Americans aged 65 and older will
exceed 16% of the population. We believe these demographic
trends will produce a growing demand for our services.
Nevertheless, the number of annual deaths in North America is
expected to remain relatively constant for at least another
decade because of healthier lifestyles and improved medical care.
In 2003 life expectancy in the United States reached
77.6 years, compared with 74.6 years in 1983,
according to the National Center for Health Statistics.
Therefore, our near-term strategies do not anticipate any
increase in the number of deaths. Rather, they are designed to
increase volume and profitability at existing businesses.
|
|
|
Average Revenue per Funeral Service |
Average revenue per funeral service is a primary driver of our
funeral revenues. We calculate average revenue per funeral
service by dividing funeral revenue (excluding general agency
(GA) revenue, which are commissions we receive from
third-party insurance companies when our customers purchase
insurance contracts from them, and Kenyon revenue) by the number
of funeral services performed during the period. SCIs
comparable average revenue per funeral service totaled $4,316 in
fiscal 2004, $4,410 in fiscal 2005, and $4,669 during the six
months ended June 30, 2006. The improvement in SCIs
average revenue per funeral service is due, in part, to
strategic plans initiated in 2005 and 2006 related to pricing
and customer segmentation. Over the last twelve months, SCI has
realigned its pricing away from its product offerings to its
service offerings, concentrating on those areas where its
customers believe the most value is added. In early 2006, as a
result of its customer segmentation strategy, SCI exited certain
activities that generated very low margins. These initiatives,
while reducing funeral case volume, have generated significant
improvements in both average revenue per funeral service and
gross margin. We expect these improvements to continue in the
future as we continue to exit other markets and redeploy our
resources to more profitable areas. Alderwoods comparable
average revenue per funeral service totaled $4,036 in fiscal
2004, $4,160 in fiscal 2005 and $4,294 during the twenty four
weeks ended June 17, 2006.
SCI has received over $1.9 billion in asset sale proceeds
since 2000, divesting over 2,700 funeral homes and cemeteries.
These divestitures included SCIs operations in Europe and
South America as well as underperforming businesses in North
America. The majority of these transactions were sales of
companies with multiple operating locations. Alderwoods has
received over $228 million in asset sale
47
proceeds since 2002, divesting over 250 funeral homes and
cemeteries and its non-strategic home service insurance company.
SCI expects to execute a consent order with the staff of the FTC
in connection with the acquisition, which will identify certain
properties the FTC will require us to divest as a result of the
acquisition. The consent order will be subject to approval by
the FTC commissioners, which approval is a condition to the
consummation of the acquisition. No final agreement has been
reached with any third party concerning the sale of any such
assets. We believe the divestiture of these assets, together
with the divestiture of other SCI assets that we have identified
for sale, will generate proceeds of approximately
$200 million in the near future, which we expect to use to
repay debt. There can be no assurance that the divestitures
described above will be consummated, or if consummated will
generate the proceeds described above. For purposes of the pro
forma information in this prospectus the assets to be sold
pursuant to the divestitures have been reclassified on the pro
forma balance sheet as assets held for sale and the results of
operations of these assets have been eliminated from the pro
forma statement of operations. No pro forma adjustments have
been made to reflect any anticipated gain or loss from the
divestitures and no adjustment has been made to reflect any
earnings benefit from the reinvestment of any proceeds from the
divestitures or any reduction of debt from the application of
sales proceeds. In addition, after completion of the
acquisition, we intend to undertake a comprehensive review of
all our integrated operations and we believe there may be
further asset sales in the next six to 18 months.
Preneed Production and
Maturities
In addition to selling our products and services to client
families at the time of need, we sell price guaranteed preneed
funeral and cemetery trust contracts which provide for future
funeral or cemetery services and merchandise. Since preneed
funeral and cemetery services or merchandise will not be
provided until some time in the future, most states and
provinces require that all or a portion of the funds collected
from customers on preneed funeral and cemetery contracts be paid
into trusts until the merchandise is delivered or the service is
performed. In certain situations, where permitted by state or
provincial laws, we post a surety bond as financial assurance
for a certain amount of the preneed funeral or cemetery contract
in lieu of placing funds into trust accounts.
The following table reflects our North America backlog of trust
funded deferred preneed funeral and cemetery contract revenues
including amounts related to Non-controlling interest in
funeral and cemetery trusts at December 31, 2005 on a
combined historical basis. Additionally, we have reflected our
North America backlog of unfulfilled insurance-funded contracts
(not included in our consolidated balance sheet) and total North
America backlog of preneed funeral contract revenues at
December 31, 2005. The backlog amounts presented are
reduced by an amount that we believe will cancel before maturity
based on our historical experience.
The table also reflects our North America trust funded preneed
funeral and cemetery receivables and trust investments
associated with our backlog of trust funded deferred preneed
funeral and cemetery contract revenues, net of an estimated
cancellation allowance, on a combined historical basis
We believe that the table below is meaningful because it sets
forth the aggregate amount of future revenues we expect to
recognize as a result of preneed sales, on a combined historical
basis, as well as the amount of assets associated with those
revenues. Because the future revenues exceed the asset amounts,
our future revenues will exceed the amount of cash actually
received when the revenues are generated.
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2005 |
|
SCI | |
|
Alderwoods | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Backlog of trust funded deferred preneed funeral revenues
|
|
$ |
1,495.5 |
|
|
$ |
355.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,850.7 |
|
Backlog of third-party insurance funded preneed funeral revenues
|
|
|
2,092.1 |
|
|
|
657.0 |
|
|
|
2,749.1 |
|
Backlog of subsidiary insurance funded preneed funeral revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
331.6 |
|
|
|
331.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total backlog of preneed funeral revenues
|
|
$ |
3,587.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,343.8 |
|
|
$ |
4,931.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets associated with backlog of trust funded deferred preneed
funeral revenues, net of estimated allowance for cancellation
|
|
$ |
1,158.7 |
|
|
$ |
341.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,500.1 |
|
Insurance policies associated with insurance funded deferred
preneed funeral revenues, net of estimated allowance for
cancellation
|
|
|
2,092.1 |
|
|
|
988.6 |
|
|
|
3,080.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets associated with backlog of preneed funeral revenues
|
|
$ |
3,250.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,330.0 |
|
|
$ |
4,580.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog of deferred cemetery revenues
|
|
$ |
1,644.5 |
|
|
$ |
282.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,927.3 |
|
Assets associated with backlog of deferred cemetery revenues,
net of estimated allowance for cancellation
|
|
$ |
1,157.4 |
|
|
$ |
314.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,472.1 |
|
The market value of funeral and cemetery trust investments was
based primarily on quoted market prices at December 31,
2005. The difference between the backlog and asset amounts
represents the contracts for which we have posted surety bonds
as financial assurance in lieu of trusting, the amounts
collected from customers that were not required to be deposited
to trust or bonded and allowable cash distributions from trust
assets. The table also reflects the amounts expected to be
received from insurance companies through the assignment of
policy proceeds related to insurance funded funeral contracts.
For additional information regarding preneed production and
maturities, see Critical Accounting
Policies below.
The Trend Toward
Cremation
In the deathcare industry, there has been a growing trend in the
number of cremations performed in North America as an
alternative to traditional funeral service dispositions. We
believe this presents a significant opportunity for our company,
especially since research shows that most people who choose
cremation do so for reasons unrelated to cost. We have been a
leading provider of cremation services in North America, with
cremation representing approximately 37%, 38% and 39% of our
funeral services in 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively, after
giving pro forma effect to the transactions. While cremation has
traditionally resulted in lower gross profits because it reduces
casket sales and because many customers who choose cremation may
also decide against purchasing cemetery property, we believe we
can improve revenue and profit trends associated with cremation
services by realigning our pricing model and offering better and
more personalized products and services.
Other Matters
SEC Comment Letters
The Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(Staff) issued a letter (Comment Letter)
to SCI dated April 19, 2006, commenting on certain aspects
of its initial Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005. The Staff requested and SCI
provided information regarding the treatment of certain
accounting issues. SCI believes that all of the issues raised in
the Comment Letter were appropriately addressed, including one
deathcare industry-wide issue related to the reporting of
trust-related cash flow activities that is still under review by
the Staff, as discussed below, and SCI has included required
disclosures in this prospectus or will include in future filings
to the extent necessary as a result of the SECs comments.
SCI received follow-up
letters from the Staff dated May 19, 2006 and
August 8, 2006 requesting additional information on one
matter related to its reporting of trust-related activities in
its consolidated statement of cash flows. The Staff requested
additional information regarding the treatment of preneed
49
funeral and cemetery merchandise and services trust and cemetery
perpetual care trust activity in SCIs consolidated
statement of cash flows. SCI has responded to the Staffs
request for additional information. To the best of SCIs
knowledge, this issue remains unresolved with the Staff.
Although SCI believes that its consolidated statement of cash
flows is properly presented, there can be no assurance that the
Staff will agree with SCIs current presentation.
The Staff issued a Comment Letter to Alderwoods dated
May 16, 2006, commenting on certain aspects of its Annual
Report on
Form 10-K for the
fifty-two weeks ended December 31, 2005 and its
Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended March 25, 2006. The Staff requested
and Alderwoods provided, in response letters dated June 16,
2006 and June 23, 2006, information regarding the treatment
of certain accounting issues. Alderwoods believes that all of
the issues raised in the Comment Letter were appropriately
addressed, including the industry-wide issue related to the
reporting of trust-related cash flow activities discussed above.
Although Alderwoods believes that its consolidated statement of
cash flows is properly presented, there can be no assurance that
the Staff will agree with Alderwoods current presentation.
SCI Restatement
In August 2006, SCI restated its previously issued consolidated
financial statements as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and
for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2005, as well as its unaudited quarterly
financial data for each of the interim periods of 2005 and 2004.
The restatement corrected errors related to (1) the
miscalculation of SCIs actuarially determined pension
benefit obligation, (2) the accounting for certain leases
related to funeral home properties which were previously
accounted for as operating leases but should have been accounted
for as capital leases, and (3) other
out-of-period
adjustments previously identified by SCI but deemed to be not
material either individually or in the aggregate. For additional
information regarding the restatement, see note two to
SCIs annual financial statements included elsewhere in
this prospectus.
Results of Operations
SCI
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 Compared to Six Months
Ended June 30, 2005 |
Key highlights for the six months ended June 30, 2006
included:
|
|
|
|
|
SCIs announcement, on April 3, 2006, of the execution
of the acquisition agreement; |
|
|
|
a 3.1% increase in 2006 comparable funeral and cemetery revenue
over the same period in 2005; |
|
|
|
an 8.0% increase in comparable average revenue per funeral
service compared to the first half of 2005, which helped to
offset a 5.5% decline in comparable funeral services performed; |
|
|
|
SCIs receipt and recognition of $7.9 million, or
$4.8 million after tax ($0.02 per diluted share), in
cemetery endowment care trust fund income as a result of the
resolution of disputes over ownership rights to the funds; |
|
|
|
the April 2006 and August 2006 approval by SCIs Board of
Directors of a regular quarterly dividend; and |
|
|
|
the repurchase of 3.4 million shares of SCI common stock in
the second quarter of 2006. |
In the first half of 2006, SCI reported net income of
$52.4 million or $0.18 per diluted share. These
results were impacted by net losses on dispositions and
impairment charges of $6.7 million after tax
($0.02 per diluted share).
50
In the first half of 2005, SCI reported a net loss of
$141.1 million or $0.45 per diluted share. These
results were impacted by accounting changes of
$187.5 million after tax, losses on the early
extinguishment of debt of $9.3 million after tax, and after
tax net losses on dispositions and impairment charges of
$3.7 million. During the first half of 2005, discontinued
operations produced $4.3 million of earnings.
|
|
|
Actual Versus Comparable Results |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 |
The table below reconciles SCIs GAAP results to its
comparable, or same store, results for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005. For purposes of the
table below, SCI defines comparable operations (or same store
operations) as those involving locations which were owned for
the entire period beginning January 1, 2005 and ending
June 30, 2006. The following tables present operating
results for SCI funeral and cemetery locations that were owned
by SCI throughout this period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity | |
|
Less: | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associated with | |
|
Activity | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition/ | |
|
Associated with | |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 |
|
Actual | |
|
New Construction | |
|
Dispositions | |
|
Comparable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue
|
|
$ |
576.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
571.7 |
|
|
Cemetery revenue
|
|
|
290.5 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
288.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
867.2 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
860.6 |
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$ |
873.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
866.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits
|
|
$ |
116.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
(1.1 |
) |
|
$ |
117.4 |
|
|
Cemetery gross profits
|
|
|
52.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
53.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169.5 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
171.0 |
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
$ |
170.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
(1.9 |
) |
|
$ |
172.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Activity | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associated with | |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 |
|
Actual | |
|
Dispositions | |
|
Comparable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue
|
|
$ |
598.1 |
|
|
$ |
28.8 |
|
|
$ |
569.3 |
|
|
Cemetery revenue
|
|
|
275.2 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
265.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
873.3 |
|
|
|
39.0 |
|
|
|
834.3 |
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$ |
879.3 |
|
|
$ |
39.0 |
|
|
$ |
840.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits
|
|
$ |
130.1 |
|
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
126.8 |
|
|
Cemetery gross profits
|
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
40.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170.1 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
166.9 |
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
$ |
170.8 |
|
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
|
$ |
167.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides the data necessary to calculate
SCIs comparable average revenue per funeral service in
North America for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and
2005. SCI calculates average revenue per funeral service by
dividing adjusted comparable North America funeral revenue by
the comparable number of funeral services performed in North
America during the period. In calculating average revenue per
funeral service, SCI excludes GA revenues and revenues from its
Kenyon subsidiary in order to avoid distorting its funeral case
volume averages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
(Dollars in millions, | |
|
|
except average revenue | |
|
|
per funeral service) | |
Comparable North America funeral revenue
|
|
$ |
571.7 |
|
|
$ |
569.3 |
|
Less: GA revenues(1)
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
Kenyon revenues(2)
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Comparable North America funeral revenue
|
|
$ |
553.1 |
|
|
$ |
542.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable North America funeral services performed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed
|
|
|
40,073 |
|
|
|
41,341 |
|
|
Atneed
|
|
|
78,384 |
|
|
|
84,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
118,457 |
|
|
|
125,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable North America average revenue per funeral service:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed
|
|
$ |
4,516 |
|
|
$ |
4,244 |
|
|
Atneed
|
|
|
4,748 |
|
|
|
4,363 |
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,669 |
|
|
|
4,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
(1) |
GA revenues are commissions we receive from third-party
insurance companies when customers purchase insurance contracts
from such third-party insurance companies to fund funeral
services and merchandise at a future date. |
|
(2) |
Kenyon is SCIs disaster response subsidiary that engages
in mass fatality and emergency response services. Revenues and
gross profits associated with Kenyon are subject to significant
variation due to the nature of its operations. |
Preneed average revenues in the above table represent average
comparable revenues recognized for funeral services performed
during the six months ended June 30, 2006 pursuant to
preneed contractual arrangements made prior to the time of death
and, therefore, previously reflected as Deferred preneed
funeral revenues.
Funeral results
|
|
|
Consolidated Funeral Revenue |
Consolidated revenues from funeral operations were
$582.6 million in the first half of 2006 compared to
$604.1 million in the first half of 2005. Higher average
revenue per funeral service and an increase of floral revenues
of approximately $6.2 million were more than offset by a
decline in funeral services performed. This decline was
primarily attributable to a decrease in funeral properties as a
result of SCIs efforts to dispose of non-strategic
locations. SCI also believes the decline reflects a decrease in
the number of deaths. Additionally, Kenyons revenue
fell $11.5 million from $13.4 million to
$1.9 million, as Kenyon was not involved in any mass
fatality incidents in the first half of 2006.
|
|
|
Comparable Funeral Revenue |
North America comparable funeral revenue increased
$2.4 million in the first half of 2006 compared to the
first half of 2005 reflecting higher average revenue per funeral
service and an increase of floral revenues. GA revenue increased
$2.9 million, or 21.0%, in the first half of 2006 as a
result of a shift in the types of insurance contracts sold.
These improvements were partially offset by a decline in
comparable funeral volume coupled with the $11.5 million
decrease in Kenyons revenue, as Kenyon was not involved in
any mass fatality incidents in the first half of 2006.
The overall success of SCIs strategic pricing initiative
was partially offset by a 5.5% decrease in comparable funeral
volume in the first half of 2006 compared to the first half of
2005. SCI believes this decline reflects a decrease in the
number of deaths within the markets where it competes due, in
part, to an unusually warm winter season in the first quarter of
2006. The decline in deaths was particularly pronounced in the
Northeast United States where SCI has a high concentration of
operations. Also impacting the decline in volume were certain
local business decisions to exit unprofitable business
relationships and activities. SCI will continue to evaluate
existing relationships and may ultimately choose to exit certain
relationships as it maintains focus on its strategy. The
cremation rate was 41.3% in the first half of 2006 compared to
40.7% in the same period of 2005.
|
|
|
Average Revenue per Funeral |
Despite a 60 basis point increase in cremation rates,
SCIs focus on strategic pricing and aligning its resources
with its customer segmentation strategy over the preceding
twelve months resulted in an increase in comparable average
revenue per funeral service of 8.0%, or $345 per funeral
service (approximately 6.6% or $283 per service excluding a
floral revenue increase) over the prior year. Over the past
year, SCI has realigned its pricing away from product
offerings to its service offerings, reflecting its competitive
advantage and concentrating on those areas where SCIs
customers believe SCI adds the most value. As a result of the
communication of SCIs future customer segmentation
strategy in the fall of 2005, SCI also made local strategic
business decisions to exit certain relationships that generated
very low gross margin
53
percentages. These initiatives, while reducing SCIs
funeral cash volumes, have generated significant improvements in
average revenue per funeral service. SCI expects these
improvements to continue in the future as it redeploys its
resources to more profitable areas.
|
|
|
Consolidated Funeral Gross Profit |
Consolidated funeral gross profits decreased $13.0 million
in the first half of 2006 compared to the same period of 2005 as
the funeral revenue increases described above were more than
offset by increases in merchandise and floral costs.
Kenyons operations negatively impacted gross profit by
$3.5 million compared to the prior year.
|
|
|
Comparable Funeral Gross Profit |
Comparable North America funeral gross profit decreased
$9.4 million or 8.0% in the first half of 2006 versus the
same period of 2005. The comparable funeral gross margin
percentage decreased to 20.6% compared to 22.3% in 2005. The
revenue increases described above were more than offset by
increases in floral and merchandise costs. In addition,
Kenyons operations decreased $3.5 million compared to
the prior period.
Cemetery Results
|
|
|
Consolidated Cemetery Revenue |
Consolidated revenues from SCIs cemetery operations
increased $15.3 million, or 5.6%, in the first half of 2006
compared to the same period of 2005. The increase primarily
resulted from higher atneed revenues and increased recognition
of preneed merchandise and service sales in the first half of
2006 compared to the prior year period. Also contributing to the
increase was a $7.9 million increase in trust fund income.
|
|
|
Comparable Cemetery Revenue |
North America comparable cemetery revenue increased
$23.9 million or 9.0% compared to the first half of 2005.
The increase primarily resulted from higher atneed revenues and
increased recognition of preneed merchandise and service sales
in the first half of 2006 compared to the prior year period.
Also contributing to the increase was the receipt and
recognition of $7.9 million of trust fund income coupled
with increased recognition of merchandise and services.
|
|
|
Consolidated Cemetery Gross Profits |
Consolidated cemetery gross profits increased
$12.9 million, or 32.3%, in the first half of 2006 compared
to the first half of 2005. Cemetery gross margins, which
included $13.2 million in trust fund proceeds received in
the second quarter of 2006, increased 25.5% to 18.2%. These
improvements were also a result of increases in trust fund
income and lower sales and commission expense partially offset
by higher maintenance and administrative costs within SCIs
cemetery operations.
|
|
|
Comparable Cemetery Gross Profits |
North America comparable cemetery gross profits increased
$13.5 million in the first half of 2006 compared to the
same period of 2005. The comparable cemetery gross profit
percentage increased to 18.6% in the first half of 2006 from
15.1% in the first half of 2005. These improvements were a
result of increases in trust fund income and lower sales and
commission expense partially offset by higher maintenance and
administrative costs within SCIs cemetery operations.
54
Other Financial Statement Items
|
|
|
General and Administrative Expenses |
General and administrative expenses were $42.9 million in
the first half of 2006 compared to $42.2 million in the
first half of 2005. Increased costs associated with the
expensing of stock options, which totaled $2.5 million
(pretax), were essentially offset by a decrease in salaries and
bonuses. SCI expects stock option expense in the remaining half
of 2006 to be approximately $1.6 million in the aggregate.
Interest expense increased 4.1% to $53.3 million in the
first half of 2006, compared to $51.2 million in the first
half of 2005. The increase of $2.1 million reflects the
modification of the contractual terms of certain transportation
leases in January 2006, which resulted in additional interest
expense related to these newly reclassified capital leases. Also
included in interest expense in the first half of 2006 is
$1.4 million of additional interest related to SCIs
senior unsecured 7.00% notes due June 15, 2017. Cash
interest paid during the first half of 2006 was
$48.1 million compared to $49.9 million in the first
half of 2005. For additional information, see notes six and ten
to SCIs interim financial statements included elsewhere in
this prospectus.
Interest income of $12.8 million in the first half of 2006
increased $4.8 million compared to the same period of 2005,
reflecting the increase in SCIs cash balances invested in
commercial paper and higher interest returns.
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense), Net |
Other income (expense), net was a $4.0 million gain in the
first half of 2006, compared to an expense of $0.6 million
in the first half of 2005. The components of other income
(expense) for the periods presented are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash overrides received from a third party insurance provider
related to the sale of insurance funded preneed funeral
contracts were $3.1 million in the first half of 2006 and
$3.1 million in the same period of 2005. |
|
|
|
Surety bond premium costs were $2.0 million in the first
half of 2006 and 2005. |
|
|
|
Favorable adjustments to SCIs allowance on notes
receivable were $1.9 million in the first half of 2006. |
|
|
|
The remaining income of $1.0 million in the first half of
2006 and expense of $1.7 million in the same period of 2005
are primarily attributable to net gains and losses related to
foreign currency transactions. |
|
|
|
(Provision) Benefit for Income Taxes |
The consolidated effective tax rate in the first half of 2006
resulted in a provision of 37.3%, compared to 39.1% in the same
period of 2005. The 2006 and 2005 tax rates were negatively
impacted by permanent differences between the book and tax bases
of North America asset dispositions.
The diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding was
297.8 million in the first half of 2006, compared to
312.0 million in the same period of 2005. The decrease in
2006 versus 2005 reflects SCIs share repurchase program
initiated during 2005.
55
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
Management Summary
By the end of 2005, SCI had made substantial progress toward its
goal of selling non-strategic or underperforming businesses.
From 2003 to 2005, SCI sold or discontinued more than 1,200
locations, including over 200 in North America and all of its
locations in France and South America. As a result, SCIs
revenues have decreased from $2.3 billion in 2003 to
$1.7 billion in 2005. However, during this same period
SCIs gross profit margin improved to 17.4% from 15.4% and
its operating cash flow continued to improve. Other key
highlights during this three year period include:
|
|
|
|
|
a $500 million reduction of debt, |
|
|
|
a $450 million cash balance at December 31, 2005, |
|
|
|
investment of more than $335 million in share repurchases
which reduced SCIs outstanding shares by
47.7 million, and |
|
|
|
payment of a quarterly dividend. |
Results of Operations
In 2005, SCI reported a net loss of $127.9 million or
$0.42 per diluted share. These results were impacted by
large non-recurring items that decreased earnings, including
accounting changes of $187.5 million, net losses on asset
sales of $31.2 million, and losses on the early
extinguishment of debt of $9.3 million, partially offset by
an income tax benefit of $11.9 million. During 2005,
discontinued operations produced $4.1 million of earnings.
In 2004, SCI reported net income of $110.7 million or
$0.34 per diluted share. These results were also impacted
by large non-recurring items that decreased earnings, including
accounting changes of $50.6 million, losses on the early
extinguishment of debt of $10.5 million, and settlements of
significant litigation matters of $38.7 million. These
reductions to earnings were offset by net gains on asset sales
of $53.2 million, an income tax benefit of
$7.9 million and interest from a note receivable of
$2.7 million. During 2004, discontinued operations produced
$41.6 million of earnings.
In 2003, SCI reported net income of $85.1 million or
$0.28 per diluted share. These results were also impacted
by large non-recurring items that decreased earnings including
$61.0 million in expenses related to outstanding litigation
matters and other operating expenses related to severance costs
of $5.9 million, partially offset by a $32.7 million
net gain on dispositions and $15.8 million in earnings from
discontinued operations.
56
Actual Versus Comparable Results
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 |
The table below reconciles SCIs GAAP results to its
comparable, or same store, results for the years
ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003. For purposes of the
table below, SCI defines comparable operations (or same store
operations) as those that were owned for the entire period
beginning January 1, 2003 and ending December 31,
2005. The following tables present operating results for SCI
funeral and cemetery locations that were owned by SCI all three
years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Activity | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associated with | |
|
Less: Activity | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition/New | |
|
Associated with | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005 |
|
Actual | |
|
Construction | |
|
Dispositions | |
|
Comparable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue
|
|
$ |
1,143.6 |
|
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
|
$ |
36.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,104.7 |
|
|
Cemetery revenue
|
|
|
560.3 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
547.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,703.9 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
47.6 |
|
|
|
1,652.6 |
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
Cemetery revenue
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$ |
1,715.7 |
|
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
$ |
47.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,664.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits
|
|
$ |
214.7 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
213.1 |
|
|
Cemetery gross profits
|
|
|
81.9 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
83.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296.1 |
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
Cemetery gross profits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
$ |
298.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
297.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Activity | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associated with | |
|
Less: Activity | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition/New | |
|
Associated with | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
|
Actual | |
|
Construction | |
|
Dispositions | |
|
Comparable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue
|
|
$ |
1,120.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
71.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,047.6 |
|
|
Cemetery revenue
|
|
|
570.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
550.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,690.2 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
91.6 |
|
|
|
1,597.9 |
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue
|
|
|
139.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127.3 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
Cemetery revenue
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128.6 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$ |
1,831.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
220.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,610.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits
|
|
$ |
214.7 |
|
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
|
$ |
207.9 |
|
|
Cemetery gross profits
|
|
|
102.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
103.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
316.8 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
311.1 |
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
Cemetery gross profits
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
$ |
330.0 |
|
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
$ |
17.6 |
|
|
$ |
312.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Activity | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associated with | |
|
Less: Activity | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition/New | |
|
Associated with | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2003 |
|
Actual | |
|
Construction | |
|
Dispositions | |
|
Comparable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue
|
|
$ |
1,143.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
96.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,047.0 |
|
|
Cemetery revenue
|
|
|
572.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
551.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,716.1 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
117.0 |
|
|
|
1,598.7 |
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue
|
|
|
595.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
584.6 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
Cemetery revenue
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
597.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
585.8 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$ |
2,313.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
702.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,610.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits
|
|
$ |
202.6 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
|
$ |
193.9 |
|
|
Cemetery gross profits
|
|
|
82.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
77.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285.0 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
271.8 |
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits
|
|
|
71.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68.2 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
Cemetery gross profits
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68.3 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
$ |
356.2 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
81.6 |
|
|
$ |
274.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides the data necessary to calculate
SCIs comparable average revenue per funeral service in
North America for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004
and 2003. SCI calculates average revenue per funeral service by
dividing adjusted comparable North America funeral revenue by
the comparable number of funeral services performed in North
America during the period. In calculating average revenue per
funeral service, SCI excludes General Agency (GA) revenues
and revenues from its Kenyon subsidiary in order to avoid
distorting SCIs averages of normal funeral case volume.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except average | |
|
|
revenue per funeral service) | |
Comparable North America funeral revenue
|
|
$ |
1,047.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,047.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,104.7 |
|
Less: GA revenues(1)
|
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
27.7 |
|
|
Kenyon revenues(2)
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Comparable North America funeral revenue
|
|
$ |
1,008.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,016.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,053.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable North America funeral services performed
|
|
|
239.5 |
|
|
|
235.5 |
|
|
|
238.8 |
|
Comparable North America average revenue per funeral service
|
|
$ |
4,212 |
|
|
$ |
4,316 |
|
|
$ |
4,410 |
|
|
|
(1) |
GA revenues are commissions we receive from third-party
insurance companies when customers purchase insurance contracts
from such third-party insurance companies to fund funeral
services and merchandise at a future date. |
|
(2) |
Kenyon is SCIs disaster response subsidiary that engages
in mass fatality and emergency response services. Revenues and
gross profits associated with Kenyon are subject to significant
variation due to the nature of its operations. |
59
Funeral Results
Consolidated Funeral
Revenue
Consolidated revenues from funeral operations declined by
$104.5 million in 2005 compared to 2004 primarily due to
the sale of funeral operations in France which contributed
$127.3 million in revenues during 2004. The decrease in
revenues related to SCIs former French operations was
offset by an increase in North America revenues of
$23.5 million. This increase was primarily due to an
increase in Kenyons revenues of $20.4 million over
prior year resulting from disaster management services provided
in Asia, Greece and the U.S. gulf coast. Consolidated
funeral revenues in 2004 decreased $480.0 million compared
to 2003, largely because of the March 2004 disposition of
funeral operations in France, which represented
$457.3 million of the decline.
North America comparable revenue increased in 2005
$57.1 million over 2004. Increases in Kenyon revenue as
described above contributed $20.5 million of the increase.
The remaining increase was primarily a result of an increase in
comparable atneed revenue resulting from an increase in funeral
volume and a higher average revenue per funeral. Comparable
funeral revenue in North America in 2004 increased by
$0.6 million, or less than 1%, from 2003 levels, primarily
due to an $8.6 million decrease in Kenyon revenue from 2003
disaster management services related to the World Trade Center
disaster and a decline in funeral volume, which were more than
offset by an increase in the average revenue per funeral service
and an increase in GA revenue.
Funeral Case Volume
North America comparable funeral volume increased in 2005
compared to 2004. This increase included a 4.8% increase in
cremations and a relatively stable number of traditional
interments which resulted from increased volume due, in part, to
marketing initiatives implemented in 2005. The funeral volumes
of SCIs comparable locations in North America were 1.7%
less in 2004 than in 2003. Over time, SCI believes the decline
in the number of deaths will stabilize because of the aging
population.
Average Revenue per
Funeral
Part of the increase in North America comparable funeral
operating revenue in 2005 described above was driven by a 2.2%
increase in average revenue and a 1.4% increase in volume. The
North America comparable average revenue per funeral service
increased 2.5% in 2004 as compared to 2003. Of the total
comparable funeral services performed in 2005, 40.2% were
cremation services in 2005 versus 38.9% in 2004 and 37.6% in
2003. Average revenue per North America comparable funeral
service was favorably impacted in 2005 by SCIs strategic
pricing realignment initiative in the last half of the year.
Consolidated Funeral Gross
Profit
Consolidated funeral gross profits decreased $11.6 million
in 2005, primarily due to an $11.6 million decline related
to the disposition of SCIs French operations in March
2004. In 2004, consolidated funeral gross profits decreased
$45.9 million from 2003, primarily because of a
$56.7 million decline related to the disposition of French
operations early in 2004. Gross profits from the French funeral
operations were $11.6 million through March 2004 when
compared to $68.3 million for the full year of 2003.
SCIs comparable North America funeral gross profit
improved $5.2 million (2.5%) in 2005 versus 2004; however,
the comparable funeral gross margin percentage decreased to
19.3% compared to 19.8% in 2004. Despite the improved revenues
discussed above, margin percentages declined because of
increased costs, which included a $4.7 million effect from
SCIs change in accounting for deferred selling costs as
well as inflationary increases in merchandise costs, increases
in group health and pension costs, and increased costs related
to SCIs trust reconciliation projects and Sarbanes-Oxley
compliance activities. Comparable funeral gross profits from
operations in North America increased $14.0 million in 2004
compared to 2003 despite a decline in North America comparable
funeral revenues. This increase was a result of reduced overhead
costs and lower pension expenses, which were partially offset by
declines in
60
revenue from Kenyon. The comparable funeral gross margin
percentage improved to 19.8% in 2004, compared to 18.5% in 2003.
Cemetery Results
Consolidated Cemetery
Revenue
Consolidated cemetery revenues decreased $11.0 million in
2005 versus 2004 due to a $9.8 million decline in North
America operations. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease
in the number of SCIs North America properties as a result
of SCIs continued effort to dispose of non-strategic
locations. Consolidated cemetery revenues in 2004 were slightly
below 2003.
North America comparable cemetery revenue decreased
$2.4 million or 1.0% compared to 2004. This decrease
primarily resulted from declines associated with constructed
cemetery property and interest on trade receivables. Decreases
in interest on trade receivables resulted from an increase in
the number of contracts that were not financed, increased down
payments, and shorter financing terms. North America comparable
cemetery revenue in 2004 was relatively flat compared to 2003.
Consolidated Cemetery Gross
Profits
Consolidated cemetery gross profits decreased $20.3 million
in 2005 as compared to 2004. These declines were due to the
decrease in revenue discussed above, coupled with a
$9.5 million negative impact from our change in accounting
related to deferred selling costs. In 2004, consolidated
cemetery gross profits increased $19.7 million from 2003,
which resulted primarily from a reduction in North America
overhead costs, pension expenses and maintenance expenses.
North America comparable cemetery gross profits decreased
$20.2 million in 2005 compared to 2004 due to the decrease
in revenue and the change in accounting for deferred selling
costs described above. The comparable cemetery gross margin
percentage decreased to 15.1% in 2005 from 18.8% in 2004. North
America comparable cemetery gross margin increased
$25.3 million (32.5%) in 2004 compared to 2003. Gross
margin percentages improved from 14.1% to 18.8% for the same
period. These improvements were driven by increased revenues as
discussed above and reductions in overhead costs, pension
expenses and maintenance expenses due to increased focus on
SCIs cost structure.
Other Financial Statement Items
General and Administrative
Expenses
General and administrative expenses were $84.8 million in
2005 compared to $130.9 million in 2004 and
$178.1 million in 2003. Included in 2004 and 2003 are
expenses associated with the settlement of certain significant
litigation matters. SCI recognized litigation expenses (net of
insurance recoveries of $1.6 million in 2004 and
$25.0 million in 2003) of $61.1 million in 2004
compared to $95.2 million in 2003. Additionally, in 2003
SCI recognized approximately $14 million of accelerated
amortization expense related to its former information
technology systems that were replaced beginning in the second
half of 2003.
Excluding litigation expenses and accelerated system
amortization costs in all periods, general and administrative
expenses in 2005 were $84.8 million compared to
$69.8 million in 2004 and $68.9 million in 2003.
Increased costs associated with Sarbanes-Oxley compliance
efforts were partially offset by reductions in information
technology and other overhead expenses.
Gains and Impairment
(Losses) on Dispositions, Net
In 2005, SCI recognized a $26.1 million net pretax loss
from impairments. This loss was primarily associated with the
disposition of underperforming funeral and cemetery businesses
in North America (including the $30.0 million impairment of
assets sold to StoneMor Partners LP in the third quarter of
61
2005). The net loss was partially offset by the release of
approximately $15.6 million in indemnification liabilities
primarily related to the 2004 sales of SCIs United Kingdom
and French operations.
In 2004, SCI recognized a $25.8 million net pretax gain
from its disposition activities, including a $41.2 million
gain from the sale of its equity and debt holdings in its former
United Kingdom operations and a $6.4 million gain from the
disposition of its French funeral operations. These gains were
partially offset by net losses associated with various
dispositions in North America. In 2003, SCI recognized a net
pretax gain of $50.7 million primarily related to the sale
of its equity holdings in its former operations in Australia and
Spain. For further information regarding gains and impairment
losses on dispositions see note twenty to SCIs annual
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased to $103.7 million in 2005,
compared to $119.3 million in 2004 and $140.0 million
in 2003. The decline of $36.3 million, or 25.9%, in
interest expense between 2003 and 2005 reflects SCIs
improved capital structure. Between 2003 and 2005, SCI reduced
its total debt by more than $500 million by generating
improved operating cash flows and through its successful asset
divestiture programs, which produced more than $750 million
in net cash proceeds.
Interest Income
Interest income of $16.7 million in 2005, compared to
$13.5 million in 2004, reflects the increase in SCIs
cash balance invested in commercial paper, which contributed
$7.2 million. This increase was offset by $4.5 million
of reduced interest income related to a note receivable from
SCIs former investment in a United Kingdom company
collected in full in 2004. Interest income of $13.5 million
in 2004 was up from the $6.2 million reported in 2003
primarily due to interest income from SCIs former
investment in a United Kingdom company discussed above.
(Loss) Gain on Early
Extinguishment of Debt, Net
During 2005, SCI purchased $16.6 million aggregate
principal amount of its 7.70% notes due 2009 in the open
market, and $0.3 million aggregate principal amount of its
6.00% notes due 2005 in the open market. Also during 2005,
SCI redeemed $130.0 million aggregate principal amount of
its 6.875% notes due 2007 and $139.3 million aggregate
principal amount of its 7.20% notes due 2006 pursuant to a
tender offer for those notes. As a result of these transactions,
SCI recognized a loss of $14.3 million, which is comprised
of the redemption premiums paid of $12.2 million and the
write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs of
$2.1 million, recorded in Loss (gain) on early
extinguishment of debt in SCIs consolidated statement
of operations during the year ended December 31, 2005.
In 2004, SCI extinguished $200.0 million aggregate
principal amount of the 6.00% notes due 2005, pursuant to a
tender offer for those notes. SCI also purchased
$8.7 million aggregate principal amount of the
6.00% notes due 2005 in the open market. The holders of
$221.6 million of SCIs 6.75% convertible
subordinated notes due 2008 converted their holdings to equity
in June 2004, pursuant to the terms of the notes.
Simultaneously, SCI redeemed the remaining outstanding
$91.1 million of the notes. As a result of these
transactions, SCI recognized a loss on the early extinguishment
of debt of $16.8 million recorded in (Loss) gain on
early extinguishment of debt in the consolidated statement
of operations during the year ended December 31, 2004.
Other Income, Net
Other income, net was $2.8 million in 2005, compared to
$9.7 million in 2004 and $8.3 million in 2003. The
components of other income for the years presented are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash overrides received from a third party insurance provider
related to the sale of insurance funded preneed funeral
contracts were $6.0 million in 2005, compared to
$6.3 million in 2004 and $5.6 million in 2003. |
62
|
|
|
|
|
Surety bond premium costs were $3.6 million in 2005,
compared to $4.0 million in 2004 and $4.1 million in
2003. |
|
|
|
The remaining income of $0.4 million in 2005, income of
$7.4 million in 2004, and income of $6.8 million in
2003 are primarily attributable to net gains and losses related
to foreign currency transactions. |
(Provision) Benefit for
Income Taxes
SCIs consolidated effective tax rate in 2005 resulted in a
provision of 37.5%, compared to a benefit of 6.8% in 2004 and a
provision of 27.6% in 2003. The 2005 tax rate was negatively
impacted by permanent differences between the book and tax bases
of North America asset dispositions and was partially offset by
state net operating loss benefits. The 2004 tax rate was
favorably impacted by tax benefits resulting from the
disposition of our operations in France and the United Kingdom
and from state net operating losses realized in 2004. The tax
benefits from dispositions result from differences between book
and tax bases and from the reversal of tax liabilities that were
then recorded as warranty indemnification liabilities.
Weighted Average
Shares
The weighted average number of shares outstanding was
306.7 million in 2005, compared to 344.7 million in
2004 and 300.8 million in 2003. The decrease in 2005 versus
2004 was mainly due to SCIs share repurchase program,
which began in the third quarter of 2004. The increase in 2004
versus 2003 was mainly due to the conversion of SCIs
convertible senior notes in June 2004, which resulted in the
issuance of approximately 32.0 million shares. The assumed
conversion of the notes was antidilutive in 2003. The remaining
share increase in 2004 was related to dilutive outstanding stock
options and the contribution of common stock to SCIs
401(k) retirement plan, which was partially offset by share
repurchases. Effective January 1, 2005, SCI began
contributing cash to fund its matching contribution to its
401(k) retirement plan and discontinued funding through the use
of common stock.
Alderwoods
The operations of Alderwoods comprise three businesses: funeral
activities, cemetery activities and an insurance business in
support of its preneed funeral business. Additional segment
information is provided in note 7 to Alderwoods
interim financial statements and note 16 to
Alderwoods annual financial statements included elsewhere
in this prospectus.
Alderwoods fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest to
December 31 in each year (whether before or after such
date). Alderwoods first and second fiscal quarters each
consist of 12 weeks and its third fiscal quarter consists
of 16 weeks. In order to cause Alderwoods fourth
fiscal quarter to end on the same day as the fiscal year, its
fourth fiscal quarter consists of 13 weeks rather than
12 weeks in certain years. Therefore, this prospectus
includes Alderwoods annual financial statements as of and
for the fifty-two weeks ended December 31, 2005, the
fifty-two weeks ended January 1, 2005, and the fifty-three
weeks ended January 3, 2004, and its interim financial
statements as of and for the twenty-four weeks ended
June 17, 2006 and June 18, 2005.
63
Twenty-four Weeks Ended June 17, 2006 Compared to
Twenty-four Weeks Ended June 18, 2005.
Certain information from continuing operations for the
24 weeks ended June 17, 2006, and 24 weeks ended
June 18, 2005, is summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
Twenty-Four Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations: |
|
June 17, 2006 |
|
June 18, 2005 |
|
Amount |
|
Percentages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral other information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of funeral services performed
|
|
|
53,247 |
|
|
|
56,735 |
|
|
|
(3,488 |
) |
|
|
(6.1 |
)% |
|
Number of same site funeral services performed
|
|
|
53,070 |
|
|
|
55,073 |
|
|
|
(2,003 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
)% |
Average revenue per funeral service
|
|
$ |
4,294 |
|
|
$ |
4,133 |
|
|
$ |
161 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
Same site average revenue per funeral service
|
|
$ |
4,294 |
|
|
$ |
4,138 |
|
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
Preneed funeral contracts written (in millions)
|
|
$ |
85.5 |
|
|
$ |
90.3 |
|
|
$ |
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
)% |
Preneed funeral conversion (percentages)
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery other information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of cemetery interments
|
|
|
21,057 |
|
|
|
22,501 |
|
|
|
(1,444 |
) |
|
|
(6.4 |
)% |
Preneed cemetery contracts written (in millions)
|
|
$ |
45.1 |
|
|
$ |
45.8 |
|
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
)% |
During the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005, some of
Alderwoods operations were affected by Hurricane Katrina.
Alderwoods operates 30 funeral homes, four cemeteries and a
limousine company in those areas of Louisiana and Mississippi
that were affected by the hurricane on August 29, 2005.
Alderwoods has experienced some damage at all of these
locations. Of the 30 funeral homes, seven experienced
significant damage, were not in operation at the end of the 2005
fiscal year and are not expected to reopen. All four cemeteries
are in operation. The New Orleans limousine company that had
provided services both to Alderwoods funeral operations
and other third-parties experienced significant damage to its
fleet of vehicles and will not be resuming operations.
Alderwoods insurance subsidiary is headquartered in New
Orleans and although forced to relocate temporarily to
Cincinnati, has resumed operations from New Orleans. The
temporary relocation did not significantly affect
Alderwoods operating results.
Alderwoods is making every effort to use its existing operating
facilities to provide services to customers normally served by
Alderwoods closed locations.
Alderwoods purchases insurance coverage for property damage,
including damage from wind and flood, subject to separate
limits, sub-limits and deductible amounts. Alderwoods, along
with its insurance providers, is continuing to assess and
estimate the extent of damages. Based on a review of
Alderwoods insurance policy, Alderwoods expects to recover
a substantial portion of the costs associated with the storm
damage through insurance, including the capital costs of
rebuilding. For those properties not in operation and requiring
significant repair or rebuilding, Alderwoods has considered the
properties destroyed or abandoned and based on estimated
insurance proceeds of $12.6 million, has realized a gain of
$1.0 million in the 12 weeks ended June 17, 2006
on the writeoff of the applicable buildings and contents.
Alderwoods has initiated or completed much of the damage repairs
and along with its insurance providers, is continuing to
estimate the full extent of repairs and replacement costs.
Alderwoods may record additional expense for changes to its
expected deductible under its insurance policies and other
expenses not expected to be reimbursed under the insurance
policy. During the 12 weeks ended June 17, 2006,
Alderwoods reduced its expected costs by $0.2 million.
Alderwoods has business interruption insurance that allows the
recovery of operating costs and lost profits. Alderwoods is
preparing its analysis in support of a claim. Potential proceeds
from this claim cannot currently be reasonably estimated and
therefore no receivable or recovery has been recorded as of
June 17, 2006.
64
Additional information regarding Hurricane Katrina is provided
in note 12 to Alderwoods interim financial statements
and note 22 to Alderwoods annual financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Continuing Operations
Consolidated revenue of $354.3 million for the
24 weeks ended June 17, 2006, decreased by
$6.4 million, or 1.8%, compared to the corresponding period
in 2005, reflecting decreases in the funeral and cemetery
segments partially offset by an increase in insurance revenue.
Consolidated gross margin as a percentage of revenue decreased
to 16.6% for the 24 weeks ended June 17, 2006, from
17.9% for the corresponding period in 2005.
Funeral revenue of $228.7 million for the 24 weeks
ended June 17, 2006, decreased by $5.8 million, or
2.5%, compared to $234.5 million for the corresponding
period in 2005, primarily as a result of a decrease in the
number of funeral services performed partially offset by an
increase of $161, or 3.9%, in average revenue per funeral
service performed. The number of funeral services performed
during the 24 weeks ended June 17, 2006 decreased by
6.1% from the corresponding period in 2005. The increase in
average revenue per funeral service performed was achieved
through adjusting the pricing and mix of merchandise and
services offered to customer families designed to both meet
customer family needs and to increase average revenues.
Included in the funeral revenue for the 24 weeks ended
June 17, 2006 is $12.5 million from 2,690 funeral
services performed in New Orleans, Louisiana and on the Gulf
Coast of Mississippi compared to $14.4 million of funeral
revenue from 3,079 funeral services performed for the
24 weeks ended June 18, 2005. Alderwoods funeral
operations in these areas were significantly affected by
Hurricane Katrina.
On a same site basis, funeral revenue was $227.9 million
for both the 24 weeks ended June 17, 2006 and for the
corresponding period in 2005. Same site calls decreased by 2,003
or 3.6% compared to the comparative period. This was offset by
an increase in same site average revenue per funeral service of
$156 or 3.8% compared to the comparative period in 2005. If the
locations affected by Hurricane Katrina were removed, the number
of funeral services performed on a same site basis would have
declined 4.0% from the corresponding period in 2005.
The number of cremation services performed as a percentage of
total services performed increased to 37.5% for the
24 weeks ended June 17, 2006, compared to 36.2% for
the corresponding period in 2005, consistent with national
trends.
Funeral gross margin as a percentage of revenue decreased to
20.1% for the 24 weeks ended June 17, 2006, compared
to 21.3% for the corresponding period in 2005. The decrease in
gross margin was primarily due to reduced revenue as a result of
a lower number of services performed offset by $1.0 million
gain related to the estimated insurance settlement of destroyed
or abandoned properties and lower wage and benefit costs of
$1.3 million.
Preneed funeral contracts written for the 24 weeks ended
June 17, 2006, were $85.5 million, compared to
$90.3 million for the corresponding period in 2005. For the
24 weeks ended June 17, 2006, 27% of the funeral
services performed were derived from the preneed backlog,
consistent with the comparative period in 2005.
Cemetery revenue of $79.3 million for the 24 weeks
ended June 17, 2006, was $2.9 million, or 3.5%, lower
than cemetery revenue for the corresponding period in 2005,
primarily due to lower revenue recognized from preneed space
sales.
Cemetery gross margin as a percentage of revenue decreased to
13.7% for the 24 weeks ended June 17, 2006, compared
to 15.1% for the corresponding period in 2005, primarily due to
lower revenue from preneed space sales offset by lower preneed
space cost of goods sold of $1.5 million and decreased wage
and benefit costs of $0.6 million.
65
Preneed cemetery contracts written for the 24 weeks ended
June 17, 2006, were $45.1 million, compared to
$45.8 million for the corresponding period in 2005.
Insurance revenue for the 24 weeks ended June 17,
2006, increased $2.3 million, or 5.3%, compared to the
corresponding period in 2005, primarily due to increases in
premiums of $1.4 million and increased investment income of
$1.3 million offset by $0.4 million of capital gains
in 2005 not repeated in 2006. Insurance premium revenue is
dependent on the level of preneed funeral contracts written over
time that are funded by Alderwoods insurance subsidiary.
Insurance production represents the insurance segments
participation in Alderwoods preneed funeral contracts and
for the 24 weeks ended June 17, 2006 was
$60.6 million compared to $64.0 million for the
corresponding period in 2005. Insurance gross margin as a
percentage of revenue decreased to 4.5% for the 24 weeks
ended June 17, 2006, compared to 4.8% for the corresponding
period in 2005. The 24 weeks ended June 17, 2006
showed improvement from business growth offset by approximately
$0.3 million of expenses from the impact of Hurricane
Katrina on outstanding policies.
General and administrative expenses for Alderwoods for the
24 weeks ended June 17, 2006, were $32.6 million,
or 9.2% of consolidated revenue, compared to $12.3 million,
or 3.4% of consolidated revenue, for the corresponding period in
2005. General and administrative expenses included the following
items affecting the comparison of the 24 weeks ended
June 17, 2006 to the 24 weeks ended June 18, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
June 17, 2006 |
|
June 18, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
Legal expenses related to Funeral Consumers Alliance litigation
|
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Legal and other expenses related to the acquisition
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity incentive plan stock based compensation expense related
to stock options and restricted stock units
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in long term executive incentive expense
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange impact on Canadian based support centre expenses
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in retirement allowance accrual
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Reduction in accrual on settlement of US trustee bankruptcy fee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
Recovery of corporate receivable previously fully reserved
against
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.9 |
) |
Included in general and administrative expenses for the
24 weeks ended June 17, 2006 was $1.6 million of
stock based compensation expense from stock options and
restricted stock units resulting from the adoption of
SFAS 123R using the modified prospective method. For the
24 weeks ended June 18, 2005, Alderwoods applied APB
No. 25 and related interpretations to account for stock
based compensation and no stock based compensation expense was
recognized.
From 2003 to 2005 Alderwoods had a long term incentive plan for
its executive officers based on Alderwoods performance targets
for which an expense of $1.3 million was recorded in
general and administrative expenses for the 24 weeks ended
June 18, 2005. In July, 2005 Alderwoods adopted the
2005-2007 Executive Strategic Incentive Plan, a stock price
based incentive plan for its executive officers. This stock
price based incentive plan is accounted for under SFAS 123R
as a liability based award, resulting in the measurement of the
estimated fair value at each reporting date. On adoption of
SFAS 123R, Alderwoods recorded a cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle as of January 1, 2006 of
$1.2 million based on a estimated fair value of
$6.6 million as at January 1, 2006. On June 17,
2006, additional compensation expense of $3.0 million was
recorded for the 24 weeks ended June 17, 2006 based on
estimated fair value of $11.2 million as at June 17,
2006.
66
Interest expense on long-term debt for the 24 weeks ended
June 17, 2006, was $12.9 million, reflecting the
effect of principal repayments and lower interest rates compared
to interest expense and tender premium in the corresponding
period in 2005, as detailed in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 Weeks Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
June 17, 2006 | |
|
June 18, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Interest on long-term debt
|
|
$ |
12.0 |
|
|
$ |
12.5 |
|
Amortization of debt issue costs
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Tender premium on the repurchase of Alderwoods
12.25% Senior Unsecured Notes due in 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest on long-term debt and refinancing costs
|
|
$ |
12.9 |
|
|
$ |
14.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense for the 24 weeks ended June 17,
2006 was $7.3 million compared to $18.2 million for
the corresponding period in 2005. Alderwoods financial
statement effective tax rate for the 24 weeks ended
June 17, 2006 was 55.4%. The effective tax rate will vary
from the statutory rate because, (i) stock option
compensation expense recorded as a result of the adoption of
SFAS 123R is a permanent difference in certain
jurisdictions, (ii) costs related to the acquisition with
SCI may not be deductible, (iii) the realization of the
benefits of the tax assets that had a corresponding valuation
allowance established on January 2, 2002 will result in a
reduction to goodwill established on January 2, 2002,
(iv) the realization of tax assets that had a corresponding
valuation allowance established after January 2, 2002 will
result in a benefit, and (v) losses incurred in certain
jurisdictions may not offset the tax expense in profitable
jurisdictions.
During the 24 weeks ended June 17, 2006, Alderwoods
sold five funeral locations for gross proceeds of
$1.2 million.
In fiscal years 2002 through 2004, Alderwoods engaged in a
strategic market rationalization assessment to dispose of
cemetery and funeral operating locations that did not fit into
Alderwoods market or business strategies, as well as
underperforming locations and excess cemetery land.
As of June 18, 2005, Alderwoods had completed the strategic
market rationalization program except for one cemetery which was
classified back to continuing operations during the 12 and
24 weeks ended June 18, 2005.
67
|
|
|
Preneed Funeral and Cemetery Backlog for Continuing
Operations |
Alderwoods backlog represents preneed funeral and cemetery
arrangements with customer families. These arrangements are
subject to trust or insurance funding requirements. The
activities in Alderwoods funeral backlog, excluding the
effects of unrealized gains and losses on trust investments,
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 Weeks Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
June 17, 2006 | |
|
June 18, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Funeral backlog:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$ |
1,336,829 |
|
|
$ |
1,275,972 |
|
|
Sales, net of cancellations
|
|
|
81,201 |
|
|
|
85,019 |
|
|
Maturities
|
|
|
(75,391 |
) |
|
|
(68,200 |
) |
|
Net increase in insurance benefits and earnings realized on
funeral trust balances
|
|
|
7,663 |
|
|
|
8,741 |
|
|
Change in cancellation reserve
|
|
|
1,691 |
|
|
|
5,395 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(948 |
) |
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$ |
1,351,045 |
|
|
$ |
1,307,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust funded
|
|
$ |
344,222 |
|
|
$ |
345,921 |
|
Third party insurance companies
|
|
|
651,486 |
|
|
|
660,966 |
|
Subsidiary insurance company
|
|
|
355,337 |
|
|
|
300,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,351,045 |
|
|
$ |
1,307,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The activities in Alderwoods cemetery backlog, excluding
the effects of unrealized gains and losses on trust investments,
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 Weeks Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
June 17, 2006 | |
|
June 18, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Cemetery backlog:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$ |
276,755 |
|
|
$ |
262,825 |
|
|
Sales, net of cancellations
|
|
|
49,910 |
|
|
|
44,089 |
|
|
Maturities
|
|
|
(46,086 |
) |
|
|
(41,688 |
) |
|
Earnings realized on cemetery trust balances
|
|
|
3,122 |
|
|
|
3,635 |
|
|
Change in cancellation reserve
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
1,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$ |
284,062 |
|
|
$ |
270,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fifty-two Weeks Ended December 31, 2005, Fifty-two
Weeks Ended January 1, 2005, and Fifty-three Weeks Ended
January 3, 2004. |
Detailed below are the operating results of Alderwoods for the
52 weeks ended December 31, 2005, the 52 weeks
ended January 1, 2005 and the 53 weeks ended
January 3, 2004. The operating results are expressed in
dollar amounts as well as relevant percentages, presented as a
percentage of revenue.
The following provides a detailed discussion of continuing
operations, which consist of those businesses Alderwoods owned
and operated both for the entire current and prior fiscal years,
and those businesses that have been opened during either the
current or prior fiscal years. Discontinued operations consist
of those that have been sold or closed during either the current
or prior fiscal years. During 2005, Alderwoods had completed the
sale of all the locations classified as discontinued operations
in its strategic market rationalization program, except for one
cemetery which was reclassified to continuing operations.
68
Certain information for the 52 weeks ended
December 31, 2005, and the 52 weeks ended
January 1, 2005, is summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
52 Weeks Ended |
|
December 31, |
|
January 1, |
|
|
Continuing Operations: |
|
2005 |
|
2005 |
|
Amount |
|
Percentages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral other information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of funeral services performed
|
|
|
115,555 |
|
|
|
117,525 |
|
|
|
(1,970 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
)% |
|
Number of same site funeral services performed
|
|
|
113,300 |
|
|
|
114,062 |
|
|
|
(762 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
)% |
Average revenue per funeral service
|
|
$ |
4,152 |
|
|
$ |
4,024 |
|
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
Same site average revenue per funeral service
|
|
$ |
4,160 |
|
|
$ |
4,036 |
|
|
$ |
124 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
Preneed funeral contracts written (in millions)
|
|
$ |
191.0 |
|
|
$ |
179.5 |
|
|
$ |
11.5 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
Preneed funeral conversion (percentages)
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery other information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of cemetery interments
|
|
|
46,794 |
|
|
|
46,461 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
Preneed cemetery contracts written (in millions)
|
|
$ |
94.5 |
|
|
$ |
86.9 |
|
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
% |
Alderwoods recorded an expense of $1.8 million in the
52 weeks ended December 31, 2005, representing its
expected deductible under its insurance policies and other
expenses not expected to be reimbursed under the insurance
policy. Under its internal risk sharing practice,
Alderwoods aggregate deductible costs are charged to all
its operations, not just the locations affected by Hurricane
Katrina. The effect on funeral and cemetery costs for the
52 weeks ended December 31, 2005 was $1.3 million
and $0.5 million respectively.
Alderwoods received in 2005, $4.1 million as an advance
payment from its insurance companies for claims submitted. This
was not recorded as income but as insurance proceeds to be
applied against incurred and anticipated repair and rebuilding
costs.
Alderwoods is self-insured for physical damage to its owned and
leased automobiles and charges the aggregate resulting costs to
all of its operations. Hurricane Katrina resulted in estimated
damages across Alderwoods vehicles aggregating
$0.6 million. The effect of Hurricane Katrina vehicle
damage on funeral and cemetery costs for the 52 weeks ended
December 31, 2005 was $0.5 million and
$0.1 million respectively.
Additional information regarding Hurricane Katrina is provided
in note 22 to Alderwoods annual financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Consolidated revenue of $748.9 million for the
52 weeks ended December 31, 2005, increased by
$31.8 million, or 4.4%, compared to the 52 weeks ended
January 1, 2005, reflecting increases in all business
segment revenues. Consolidated gross margin as a percentage of
revenue decreased to 15.3% for the 52 weeks ended
December 31, 2005, from 17.4% for the corresponding period
in 2004.
Funeral revenue of $479.8 million for the 52 weeks
ended December 31, 2005, increased by $6.9 million,
compared to $472.9 million for the 52 weeks ended
January 1, 2005, primarily as a result of an increase of
$128, or 3.2%, in average revenue per funeral service performed,
partially offset by a decrease in the number of funeral services
performed. The number of funeral services performed during the
52 weeks ended December 31, 2005 decreased by 1.7%
from the 52 weeks ended January 1, 2005. The increase
in average revenue per funeral service performed was achieved
through adjusting the pricing and mix of merchandise and
services offered to customer families designed to both meet
customer family needs and to increase average revenues.
69
Included in the funeral revenue for the 52 weeks ended
December 31, 2005 is $29.5 million from 6,389 funeral
services performed in New Orleans, Louisiana, and on the Gulf
Coast of Mississippi compared to $29.7 million of funeral
revenue from 6,371 funeral services performed for the
52 weeks ended January 1, 2005. Although
Alderwoods funeral operations in these areas were affected
significantly by Hurricane Katrina, including seven locations
not expected to be reopened, Alderwoods has continued to perform
funeral services through its remaining locations, including many
services that would have been performed in the closed locations
or at competing locations that were not in operation. As a
result, much of the impact of Hurricane Katrina on funeral
revenue during 2005 was mitigated.
On a same site basis, funeral revenue was $468.8 million
for the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005, an increase
of $11.4 million compared to $457.4 million for the
52 weeks ended January 1, 2005, as a result of an
increase of $124, or 3.1%, in average revenue per funeral
service performed, partially offset by a decrease of 0.7% in the
number of funeral services performed from the 52 weeks
ended January 1, 2005. If the locations affected by
Hurricane Katrina were removed, the number of funeral services
performed on a same site basis would have declined 1.2% from the
52 weeks ended January 1, 2005 as the impacted
locations were performing well prior to Hurricane Katrina and
during the 12 weeks ended December 31, 2005.
The number of cremation services performed as a percentage of
total services performed increased to 36% for the 52 weeks
ended December 31, 2005, compared to 35% for the
52 weeks ended January 1, 2005, consistent with
national trends. The number of cremation services performed may
impact funeral revenue, as the average revenue per cremation
service is typically lower than the average revenue for a
traditional funeral service.
Funeral gross margin as a percentage of revenue decreased to
18.2% for the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005,
compared to 20.4% for the 52 weeks ended January 1,
2005. The decrease in gross margin is primarily due to higher
expenses compared to the prior year as detailed in the following
table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
Wage inflation, increased employee benefits expense, and
increased wages, training and advertising costs related to
Alderwoods expanded field management structure and
investment in programs designed to build local brand awareness
and generate growth in future services
|
|
$ |
4.5 |
|
Incentive bonus expense for funeral operations previously
included in general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Increased insurance costs, including expenses not expected to be
reimbursed under Alderwoods insurance policy for damages
effected by Hurricanes Katrina, Wilma and Rita
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Increased utility costs
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Preneed funeral contracts written for the 52 weeks ended
December 31, 2005, were $191.0 million, compared to
$179.5 million for the 52 weeks ended January 1,
2005. For the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005, 27% of
the funeral services performed were derived from preneed
backlog, an increase from 26% in the 52 weeks ended
January 1, 2005.
Cemetery revenue of $174.1 million for the 52 weeks
ended December 31, 2005, was $10.1 million, or 6.1%,
higher than cemetery revenue for the 52 weeks ended
January 1, 2005, primarily due to increased space sales of
$6.1 million at Alderwoods Rose Hills subsidiary,
increased atneed service revenue of $1.7 million from a
greater number of cemetery interments at a higher average
service revenue per interment, and increased endowment care
income of $1.0 million from its investments.
70
Cemetery gross margin as a percentage of revenue decreased to
12.7% for the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005,
compared to 14.6% for the 52 weeks ended January 1,
2005. The decrease in gross margin was primarily due to higher
expenses as detailed in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
Wage inflation, increased employee benefits and workers
compensation expense
|
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
Incentive bonus expense for cemetery operations previously
included in general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Increased insurance costs including expenses not expected to be
reimbursed under Alderwoods insurance policy for damages
effected by Hurricanes Katrina, Wilma and Rita
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Increased utility costs
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Preneed cemetery contracts written for the 52 weeks ended
December 31, 2005, were $94.5 million, compared to
$86.9 million for the 52 weeks ended January 1,
2005. The increase in preneed cemetery contracts written was
primarily due to increased sales of cemetery spaces.
Insurance revenue for the 52 weeks ended December 31,
2005, increased $14.9 million, or 18.6%, compared to the
52 weeks ended January 1, 2005, primarily due to
increases in premiums of $14.1 million. Insurance premium
revenue is dependent on the level of preneed funeral contracts
written over time that are funded by Alderwoods insurance
subsidiary. Insurance production represents the insurance
segments participation in Alderwoods preneed funeral
contracts and for the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005
was $133.2 million compared to $111.7 million for the
52 weeks ended January 1, 2005. Insurance gross margin
as a percentage of revenue decreased to 5.3% for the
52 weeks ended December 31, 2005, compared to 5.9% for
the 52 weeks ended January 1, 2005, due to a decrease
in investment gains of $1.7 million compared to the
52 weeks ended January 1, 2005.
General and administrative expenses decreased $8.4 million
for the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005, to
$42.8 million, or 5.7% of consolidated revenue, compared to
$51.2 million, or 7.1% of consolidated revenue, for the
52 weeks ended January 1, 2005. General and
administrative expenses included the following items affecting
the comparison of the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005
to the 52 weeks ended January 1, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
January 1, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
Recovery of corporate receivable previously fully reserved
against
|
|
$ |
(10.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.2 |
) |
Interest income on refunds from an amended tax return
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Reduction in accrual on settlement of U.S. trustee
bankruptcy fee
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Increased wage expense related to wage inflation and additional
positions related to Sarbanes-Oxley compliance
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Decreased capital tax expense
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in incentive bonus expense
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Increased retirement allowance expense
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange impact on Canadian dollar based support centers
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reversal of legal claim accrual due to approvals obtained for
insurance coverage of the costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
Interest expense on long-term debt for the 52 weeks ended
December 31, 2005, was $30.1 million, a decrease of
$48.0 million from the 52 weeks ended January 1,
2005 expense of $78.1 million, reflecting the
71
effect of principal repayments, lower interest rates and the
effects of the debt refinancings in 2004, as detailed in the
following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Interest on long-term debt
|
|
$ |
26.6 |
|
|
$ |
38.7 |
|
Amortization of debt issue costs
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Tender premiums on the repurchase of the 12.25% Senior
Unsecured Notes due in 2009
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
32.5 |
|
Refinancing fees and costs on Credit Agreement that was
refinanced
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Unamortized deferred finance costs expensed relating to payments
made on Credit Agreement during 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Unamortized deferred finance costs expensed relating to the
Credit Agreement that was refinanced
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Unamortized deferred finance costs expensed relating to the
subordinated bridge loan due in 2005 that was fully repaid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Unamortized premium credited to interest expense on
12.25% Convertible Subordinated Notes due in 2012 that were
fully retired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
Allocation of interest to discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest on long-term debt and refinancing costs
|
|
$ |
30.1 |
|
|
$ |
78.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense for the 52 weeks ended December 31,
2005 was $4.8 million compared to a recovery of
$1.5 million for the 52 weeks ended January 1,
2005. During the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005,
Alderwoods recorded the non-cash resolution of an outstanding
tax liability by reducing its tax expense by $12.1 million
and in the fourth quarter Alderwoods recorded an income tax
refund of $3.2 million as a result of a resolution of an
IRS tax audit. The effective tax rate for the 52 weeks
ended December 31, 2005 before the above benefits was
approximately 42%.
During the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005,
Alderwoods reduced the valuation allowance against certain
deferred tax assets as a result of assuming certain future
income, resulting in a benefit of $3.1 million being
recorded in income tax expense and $9.1 million recorded as
a reduction of goodwill. This benefit was primarily offset by
increases in other deferred tax assets for which a valuation
allowance was established. The effective tax rate also varied
from the statutory tax rate for the 52 weeks ended
December 31, 2005, because in certain jurisdictions, losses
incurred may not offset the tax expense in profitable
jurisdictions.
During the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005,
Alderwoods sold seven funeral locations and one combination
location and excess real estate for gross proceeds of
$17.6 million.
Over the previous three fiscal years, Alderwoods engaged in a
strategic market rationalization assessment to dispose of
cemetery and funeral operating locations that did not fit into
Alderwoods market or business strategies, as well as
under-performing locations and excess cemetery land.
Discontinued operations in 2005 and the prior years consisted of
those businesses that have been closed or sold in prior fiscal
years and those businesses identified by Alderwoods in its
strategic market rationalization and not sold as of
January 1, 2005. Alderwoods completed the sale of all these
locations during 2005, except for one cemetery which was
reclassified to continuing operations.
Alderwoods classified all the locations identified in its
strategic market rationalization program for disposal as assets
held for sale in the consolidated balance sheets and recorded
any related operating results, long-lived asset impairment
provisions, and gains or losses recorded on disposition within
72
discontinued operations. Depreciation and amortization is not
recorded once an asset has been identified as held for sale.
Alderwoods has also reclassified the prior fiscal periods to
reflect any comparative amounts on a similar basis. All
discontinued operations financial information presented under
the insurance segment relates to Security Plan Life Insurance
Company.
During the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005,
Alderwoods sold classified discontinued operations of 18
funeral, five cemetery and four combination locations for gross
proceeds of $7.1 million.
Fifty-Two Weeks Ended January 1, 2005 Compared to
Fifty-Three Weeks Ended January 3, 2004
Certain information for the 52 weeks ended January 1,
2005, and the 53 weeks ended January 3, 2004, is
summarized in the following table. The impact of the
53rd week for the 53 weeks ended January 3, 2004,
was estimated by calculating the weekly average of the
13 weeks ended January 3, 2004. Alderwoods believes
the discussion below regarding the impact of the 53rd week
facilitates direct comparability of fiscal year results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
January 3, |
Continuing Operations: |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral other information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of funeral services performed
|
|
|
117,525 |
|
|
|
124,798 |
|
Estimated impact of the 53rd week on the number of funeral
services performed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,421 |
) |
Number of funeral services performed adjusted for the impact of
the 53rd week
|
|
|
117,525 |
|
|
|
122,377 |
|
Average revenue per funeral service
|
|
$ |
4,024 |
|
|
$ |
3,939 |
|
Preneed funeral contracts written (in millions)
|
|
$ |
179.5 |
|
|
$ |
164.8 |
|
Estimated impact of the 53rd week on preneed funeral
contracts written (in millions)
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(3.0 |
) |
Preneed funeral contracts written adjusted for the impact of the
53rd week (in millions)
|
|
$ |
179.5 |
|
|
$ |
161.8 |
|
Preneed funeral conversion (percentages)
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Cemetery other information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed cemetery contracts written (in millions)
|
|
$ |
86.9 |
|
|
$ |
83.3 |
|
Estimated impact of the 53rd week on preneed cemetery
contracts written (in millions)
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1.7 |
) |
Preneed cemetery contracts written adjusted for the impact of
the 53rd week (in millions)
|
|
$ |
86.9 |
|
|
$ |
81.6 |
|
Number of cemetery interments
|
|
|
46,461 |
|
|
|
47,924 |
|
Estimated impact of the 53rd week on the number of cemetery
interments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(909 |
) |
Number of cemetery interments adjusted for the impact of the
53rd week
|
|
|
46,461 |
|
|
|
47,015 |
|
As there were no material acquisitions or construction of new
locations in 2004 and 2003, results from continuing operations
reflect those of same site locations.
Consolidated revenue of $717.1 million for the
52 weeks ended January 1, 2005, decreased by
$3.7 million, or 0.5%, compared to $720.8 million for
the 53 weeks ended January 3, 2004. After adjusting
for an estimated impact of $14.4 million due to the
additional fifty-third week in fiscal 2003 over fiscal 2004,
consolidated revenue increased by $10.7 million. This
increase is primarily due to a $20.1 million increase in
insurance revenue, partially offset by an $8.9 million and
$0.3 million decrease in funeral and cemetery revenue,
respectively. Consolidated gross margin as a percentage of
revenue decreased to 17.4% for the 52 weeks ended
December 31, 2005, from 20.0% in 2003.
Funeral revenue of $472.9 million for the 52 weeks
ended January 1, 2005, decreased by $18.7 million,
compared to $491.6 million in 2003, partially as a result
of an estimated decrease of
73
$9.7 million due to the additional fifty-third week in 2003
over 2004. After adjusting for the effect of the fifty-third
week, funeral revenue decreased by $8.9 million, primarily
as a result of a decrease of 4,852, or 4.0%, in the number of
funeral services performed, partially offset by an increase of
$85, or 2.2%, in average revenue per funeral service performed.
The increase in average revenue per funeral service performed
was the result of Alderwoods efforts to adjust the
Alderwoods mix of merchandise and services.
The number of cremation services performed as a percentage of
total services performed increased to 35% for the 52 weeks
ended January 1, 2005, compared to 34% for 2003, consistent
with national trends.
Funeral gross margin as a percentage of revenue decreased to
20.4% for the 52 weeks ended January 1, 2005, compared
to 23.1% in 2003. The decrease in gross margin was primarily due
to the decrease in funeral revenue and increases in cost of
goods sold, wages, and facilities costs, partially offset by
decreases in operating costs and selling expenses.
Preneed funeral contracts written for the 52 weeks ended
January 1, 2005, were $179.5 million. After adjusting
for the effect of the fifty-third week, preneed funeral
contracts written for the 53 weeks ended January 3,
2004, were $161.8 million. For both the 52 weeks ended
January 1, 2005, and 53 weeks ended January 3,
2004, 26% of funeral volume was derived from backlog.
Cemetery revenue of $164.1 million for the 52 weeks
ended January 1, 2005, was $4.0 million, or 2.4%,
lower than cemetery revenue in 2003, primarily due to the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
An estimated increase of $3.5 million due to the additional
fifty-third week in 2003 over 2004. After adjusting for the
effect of the fifty-third week, cemetery revenue of
$164.1 million for the 52 weeks ended January 1,
2005, was $0.5 million, or 0.3%, lower than cemetery
revenue for the corresponding period in 2003. |
|
|
|
The increase in cemetery atneed service revenue during the
52 weeks ended January 1, 2005, compared to the
corresponding period in 2003, was partially offset by a decrease
in other cemetery revenue. Other cemetery revenue for the
52 weeks ended January 1, 2005, decreased compared to
2003, because Alderwoods revised its estimates of accrued
perpetual care liabilities and recorded a one-time
$3.9 million increase in other cemetery revenue for the
53 weeks ended January 3, 2004. The one-time
$3.9 million adjustment to increase other cemetery revenue
was necessary, because in 2001, in response to a state regulator
inquiry, Alderwoods determined that it had not properly
calculated the amount to be trusted for endowment care on the
sale of plots. Endowment care is recorded as a reduction in
other cemetery revenue, as amounts trusted are never available
to Alderwoods in the future. To properly recalculate the
appropriate perpetual care liability and its corresponding
effect on other cemetery revenue, a significant number of
individual contracts across several states needed to be
reviewed, and the perpetual care liability was recalculated
against the balance already paid in order to determine the
amount of Alderwoods additional liability. Alderwoods
prepared its best estimate of the perpetual care liability based
on a sample of contracts from each state in which the issue
existed, and in 2001, Alderwoods accrued an estimate for the
perpetual care liability of additional required funding of
$6.9 million, with the offset adjusting other cemetery
revenue. In 2003, Alderwoods completed its review and
calculation of the required additional funding and adjusted
other cemetery revenue and the perpetual care liability
accordingly. |
|
|
|
As preneed cemetery interment rights are recorded in cemetery
revenue when sold, an estimate of the related uncollectible
amounts is charged to cemetery revenue. During 2002 and 2003,
Alderwoods focused collection efforts resulted in higher
collections than anticipated on the pre-emergence receivables.
As a result of Alderwoods improvement in actual
collections, Alderwoods reversed $3.9 million of the
allowance for contract cancellations and refunds on receivables
arising from preneed cemetery interment rights with a
corresponding increase to cemetery revenue for the 53 weeks
ended January 3, 2004. |
Cemetery gross margin as a percentage of revenue decreased to
14.6% for the 52 weeks ended January 1, 2005, compared
to 17.1% for 2003. For the 52 weeks ended January 1,
2005, wages and
74
regional management costs decreased, while cost of goods sold,
selling costs, and advertising and promotion increased compared
to 2003. In addition, there was a one-time $3.9 million
increase in other cemetery revenue for the 53 weeks ended
January 3, 2004, as discussed above.
Preneed cemetery contracts written for the 52 weeks ended
January 1, 2005, were $86.9 million. After adjusting
for the effects of the fifty-third week in 2003, preneed
cemetery contracts for the 52 weeks ended January 1,
2005, were $5.6 million higher than in 2003. For the
52 weeks ended January 1, 2005, 67% of interments were
atneed and 33% were preneed fulfillments.
Insurance revenue for the 52 weeks ended January 1,
2005, increased $19.0 million, or 31.1%, compared to 2003.
After adjusting for the estimated effect of the fifty-third week
in 2003, insurance revenue increased $20.1 million, or
33.6%, primarily due to increases in premiums of
$16.6 million, interest, dividend and other investment
income of $1.9 million, and realized investment gains of
$1.6 million. Insurance premium revenue increased in 2004
primarily due to the impact of Alderwoods subsidiary, Rose
Hills, beginning to sell Alderwoods insurance products.
Insurance premiums are dependent on insurance production, as
increases in insurance production generate increased insurance
premiums over time. Insurance production, which represents the
insurance segments participation in Alderwoods
preneed funeral contracts for the 52 weeks ended
January 1, 2005, was $102.8 million compared to
$69.5 million for corresponding period in 2003. Insurance
gross margin as a percentage of revenue increased to 5.9% for
the 52 weeks ended January 1, 2005, compared to 2.9%
for the corresponding period in 2003, primarily due to the
revenue increase being at a rate higher than that of the cost
increase.
Interest expense on long-term debt and refinancing costs for the
52 weeks ended January 1, 2005, was
$78.1 million, an increase of $1.6 million compared to
the corresponding period in 2003. The effect of lower effective
interest rates and debt repayments made by Alderwoods during
2003 and the 52 weeks ended January 1, 2005, were
partially offset by costs associated primarily with
Alderwoods refinancing of long-term debt that occurred
during the 52 weeks ended January 1, 2005, as detailed
in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended | |
|
53 Weeks Ended | |
|
|
January 1, | |
|
January 3, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Interest on long-term debt
|
|
$ |
45.1 |
|
|
$ |
72.3 |
|
Tender premium on the repurchase of the 12.25% Senior
unsecured notes due in 2009
|
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized deferred finance costs expensed relating to the
Credit Agreement that was refinanced
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized deferred finance costs expensed relating to payments
made on the Credit Agreement during 2004
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Refinancing fees and costs on the Credit Agreement that was
refinanced
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized deferred finance costs expensed relating to the
subordinated bridge loan due in 2005 that was fully repaid
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized premium credited to interest expense on
12.25% Convertible subordinated notes due in 2012 that was
fully retired
|
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Tender premium on the repurchase of the 9.5% Senior
subordinated notes due in 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Unamortized discount expensed relating to the 9.5% Senior
subordinated notes due in 2004 that was fully repaid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Fees and costs for early termination of Alderwoods
previous credit facility entered into on January 2, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest on long-term debt and refinancing costs
|
|
$ |
78.1 |
|
|
$ |
76.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
General and administrative expenses for the 52 weeks ended
January 1, 2005, were $51.2 million, or 7.1% of
consolidated revenue, compared to $56.3 million, or 7.8% of
consolidated revenue in 2003. For the 52 weeks ended
January 1, 2005, general and administrative expenses
included the following items:
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive compensation for management performance was lower by
$2.9 million compared to 2003. |
|
|
|
Legal fees were lower by $1.3 million compared to fiscal
2003, primarily due to a smaller number of outstanding legal
claims and improved management of legal costs by
Alderwoodss internal legal department. |
|
|
|
Alderwoods collected $1.2 million of corporate receivables
that were previously fully reserved against. |
|
|
|
Accounting costs including audit fees increased by
$2.1 million compared to 2003, due to additional accounting
and audit work required pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and FIN No. 46R. |
|
|
|
Alderwoods has a significant portion of its corporate and
administrative functions in Canada. Expenses for these functions
are paid principally in Canadian dollars. Due to the weakening
of the US dollar against the Canadian dollar during 2004,
Alderwoods estimates that foreign exchange rate movements
resulted in an additional $3.5 million in general and
administrative expenses for the 52 weeks ended
January 1, 2005, compared to 2003, partially offset by
$0.8 million in foreign exchange gains that resulted from
Alderwoods foreign exchange derivatives program to hedge a
portion these Canadian corporate and administrative costs. |
For the 53 weeks ended January 3, 2004, general and
administrative expenses included the following items affecting
the comparison with 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses were increased by a
$10.0 million reserve for a receivable from a disposition
of assets in 2001. |
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses were reduced by a
$5.0 million reversal of accrued legal expense, which
resulted from a settlement by Alderwoods of an automobile
accident suit. In 2000, the suit was filed against Alderwoods
claiming both compensation and punitive damages, as a result of
the automobile accident. Alderwoods assessment indicated
its insurance did not cover punitive damages and as such,
Alderwoods accrued an estimated liability for probable punitive
damages. In 2003, Alderwoods and its insurance company settled
with the plaintiffs for amounts within Alderwoods
insurance coverage, which included no punitive damages. |
|
|
|
At the time of filing for bankruptcy, Loewen Group
International, Inc. (the Predecessor) had a
promissory note and non-compete obligation owing to a group of
individuals that was secured by various funeral and cemetery
properties. During the bankruptcy, a dispute arose as to whether
the obligations owed by the Predecessor were fully secured. In
the bankruptcy, secured claims were paid in cash; unsecured
claims were paid out of the unsecured claim pool established in
the Predecessors Plan. The Predecessor argued the maximum
collateral value was less than the amount of the claim and that
therefore, the claim was not fully secured. The individuals
argued that the collateral value exceeded the value of the claim
and that therefore, the claim was fully secured. |
|
|
|
|
|
This dispute could not be resolved before Alderwoods emergence
from bankruptcy on January 2, 2002, and Alderwoods recorded
the $9.0 million accrual as if the claims would be
considered fully secured. |
|
|
|
During 2003, Alderwoods reached a settlement to pay
$4.7 million in cash and in addition, to allow a portion of
the settlement as an unsecured claim to be paid out of the
unsecured claim pool established in the Predecessors Plan.
As a result of the settlement, Alderwoods reversed its remaining
accrual of $4.3 million. |
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses were reduced by
$3.1 million as a result of net interest income received
from a tax refund in connection with the audit of the
Predecessors 1993 through 1998 federal income tax returns. |
76
Income tax benefit for the 52 weeks ended January 1,
2005, was $1.4 million compared to income tax benefit of
$6.5 million for the corresponding period in 2003. The
effective tax benefit rate was 27.7% for the 52 weeks ended
January 1, 2005, compared to the effective tax benefit rate
of 235.0% for the 53 weeks ended January 3, 2004. The
effective tax rate varied from the statutory rate for the
52 weeks ended January 1, 2005, primarily due to
changes in the ratio of permanent differences to income before
income taxes, losses incurred in certain jurisdictions that did
not offset tax expenses in profitable jurisdictions, and the
favorable settlement of income tax audits. For the 53 weeks
ended January 3, 2004, the effective income tax rate varied
from the statutory rate, primarily because of a
$9.7 million favorable settlement of a federal income tax
audit. Future income and losses may require Alderwoods to record
a change in the valuation allowance of tax assets that were
taken into account in determining the net amount of liability
for deferred income taxes recorded on its balance sheet at
January 1, 2005. If this occurs, any resulting increase in
the valuation allowance would generally be treated as an
additional income tax expense in the period in which it arises,
while any resulting decrease reflecting realization of the
benefits of tax assets that had a corresponding valuation
allowance established on January 2, 2002, would be treated
as a reduction of goodwill established on January 2, 2002,
with any excess over the value assigned to such goodwill
recognized as a capital transaction.
In accordance with FAS 142, Alderwoods undertook its annual
goodwill impairment review during the 16 weeks ended
October 9, 2004. As a result of Alderwoods annual
goodwill impairment review, there was no indication of goodwill
impairment, as the estimated fair value of the funeral reporting
unit exceeded its carrying amount as at October 9, 2004.
At December 31, 2001, Alderwoods had accrued
$57.1 million of reorganization costs related to costs
incurred during the Predecessors reorganization, as well
as costs incurred in connection with the actual emergence and
various related activities. As of January 1, 2005, the
balance of $11.9 million of reorganization costs, primarily
consisting of accruals for a trustee fee dispute and legal fee
reimbursements, has been included in accounts payable and
accrued liabilities.
Discontinued operations consist of those businesses that have
been closed or sold in prior fiscal years and those businesses
identified by Alderwoods in its strategic market rationalization
and not sold as of January 1, 2005. Alderwoods completed
the sale of all these locations during 2005, except for one
cemetery which was classified back to continuing operations.
During 2003, Alderwoods identified Security Plan Life Insurance
Company, its wholly-owned home service insurance company, as a
non-strategic asset as it did not support Alderwoods
preneed funeral sales efforts. Alderwoodss continuing
wholly-owned preneed life insurance company is Mayflower
National Life Insurance Company. On June 17, 2004,
Alderwoods announced the signing of an agreement by its
subsidiary Mayflower National Life Insurance Company to sell all
the outstanding shares of Security Plan Life Insurance Company
for $85.0 million. The sale concluded on October 1,
2004. After payment of applicable taxes and expenses, and the
recapitalization of Mayflower National Life Insurance Company,
Alderwoods utilized $65.0 million of the proceeds to reduce
long-term debt. Alderwoods recorded a pre-tax gain on the sale
of $16.0 million for the 52 weeks ended
January 1, 2005.
During the 12 weeks ended March 27, 2004, Alderwoods
reduced its estimated proceeds on the group of assets held for
sale and as a result recorded an $11.3 million long-lived
asset impairment provision. At that time and previously,
Alderwoods expected certain locations to sell as two distinct
groups. One group (Group A) included 23 locations
while another group (Group B) consisted of 93
locations. Alderwoods had a commitment from a single purchaser
to purchase all of Group A, and had interest shown by six
different purchasers in bidding on all of Group B. The
impairment reviews done for each of Group A and Group B for the
first quarter of the 2004 fiscal year aggregated the carrying
values of the locations within each group to compare against the
groups estimated fair value. In the second quarter of the
2004 fiscal year, the initial purchaser of Group A declined to
purchase some of the locations in Group A. In addition, the bids
received on Group B were significantly below Alderwoods
expectations, and
77
Alderwoods determined that the locations would generate higher
proceeds if sold in smaller groups or as individual locations.
The impairment review done in second quarter of the 2004 fiscal
year looked at either individual locations or aggregated
locations into different groups than used previously for the
impairment review. Expected proceeds were estimated for each
location or new groups of aggregated locations based on current
purchase commitments, offers or comparable transactions. The
aggregate expected proceeds for all locations held for sale did
not change significantly from that used in the previous
impairment review. However, the impairment review of each
location or new groups of aggregated locations resulted in
proceeds being higher or lower than the relevant carrying values.
As a result, Alderwoods was required to record a long-lived
asset impairment provision of $11.5 million within
discontinued operations for the 12 weeks ended
June 19, 2004. During the balance of the year, most of
these assets were sold, resulting in a gain on sale of
approximately $11.0 million. Overall, Alderwoods has
recorded an aggregate $15.4 million long-lived asset
impairment provision within discontinued operations for the
52 weeks ended January 1, 2005.
Alderwoods has classified all the locations identified for
disposal as assets held for sale in the consolidated balance
sheets and recorded any related operating results, long-lived
asset impairment provisions, and gains or losses recorded on
disposition as income from discontinued operations. Depreciation
and amortization is not recorded once an asset has been
identified as held for sale. Alderwoods has also reclassified
the prior fiscal periods to reflect any comparative amounts on a
similar basis. All discontinued operations financial information
presented under the insurance segment relate to Security Plan
Life Insurance Company.
During the 52 weeks ended January 1, 2005, Alderwoods
closed 27 funeral homes and sold 52 funeral homes, 67 cemeteries
and one combination location for gross proceeds of
$32.4 million.
Preneed Funeral and Cemetery Backlog for Continuing
Operations
Alderwoods backlog represents preneed funeral and cemetery
arrangements with customer families. These arrangements are
subject to trust or insurance funding requirements. The
activities in Alderwoods funeral backlog, excluding the
effects of unrealized gains and losses on trust investments,
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Weeks Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Funeral backlog:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$ |
1,333,186 |
|
|
$ |
1,275,058 |
|
|
Sales, net of cancellations
|
|
|
32,434 |
|
|
|
38,877 |
|
|
Maturities
|
|
|
(29,709 |
) |
|
|
(34,180 |
) |
|
Net increase in insurance benefits and earnings realized on
funeral trust balances
|
|
|
4,811 |
|
|
|
12,831 |
|
|
Change in cancellation reserve
|
|
|
(853 |
) |
|
|
(7,978 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
(3,040 |
) |
|
|
(4,644 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$ |
1,336,829 |
|
|
$ |
1,279,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust funded
|
|
$ |
348,218 |
|
|
$ |
351,577 |
|
Third party insurance companies
|
|
|
657,028 |
|
|
|
656,981 |
|
Subsidiary insurance company
|
|
|
331,583 |
|
|
|
271,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,336,829 |
|
|
$ |
1,279,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Funeral backlog:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$ |
1,279,964 |
|
|
$ |
1,227,126 |
|
|
Sales, net of cancellations
|
|
|
166,194 |
|
|
|
156,466 |
|
|
Maturities
|
|
|
(132,384 |
) |
|
|
(130,129 |
) |
|
Net increase in insurance benefits and earnings realized on
funeral trust balances
|
|
|
20,858 |
|
|
|
25,214 |
|
|
Change in cancellation reserve
|
|
|
1,713 |
|
|
|
(4,025 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
5,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$ |
1,336,829 |
|
|
$ |
1,279,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust funded
|
|
$ |
348,218 |
|
|
$ |
351,577 |
|
Third party insurance companies
|
|
|
657,028 |
|
|
|
656,981 |
|
Subsidiary insurance company
|
|
|
331,583 |
|
|
|
271,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,336,829 |
|
|
$ |
1,279,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The activities in Alderwoods cemetery backlog, excluding
the effects of unrealized gains and losses on trust investments,
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Weeks Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Cemetery backlog:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$ |
274,801 |
|
|
$ |
262,380 |
|
|
Sales, net of cancellations
|
|
|
17,993 |
|
|
|
19,452 |
|
|
Maturities
|
|
|
(19,754 |
) |
|
|
(21,776 |
) |
|
Earnings realized on cemetery trust balances
|
|
|
1,990 |
|
|
|
2,654 |
|
|
Change in cancellation reserve
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$ |
275,407 |
|
|
$ |
262,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Cemetery backlog:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$ |
262,825 |
|
|
$ |
260,811 |
|
|
Sales, net of cancellations
|
|
|
88,675 |
|
|
|
79,800 |
|
|
Maturities
|
|
|
(87,470 |
) |
|
|
(83,658 |
) |
|
Earnings realized on cemetery trust balances
|
|
|
10,657 |
|
|
|
5,884 |
|
|
Change in cancellation reserve
|
|
|
2,445 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
(1,725 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$ |
275,407 |
|
|
$ |
262,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal ongoing uses of cash are to meet working capital
and capital expenditure requirements and to fund debt
obligations. Our primary sources of liquidity are cash flow from
operations, cash on hand, proceeds from asset sales and our
available capacity under our new senior credit facility, which
we believe are adequate to meet our operating needs for the
foreseeable future.
Financing for the acquisition. In connection with the
closing of the acquisition, we will enter into a new
$450 million senior credit facility, consisting of a
$150 million
3-year term loan, all
of which will be borrowed in connection with the transactions,
and a $300 million
5-year revolving credit
facility, none of which is expected to be drawn in connection
with the transactions based on expected cash balances at
closing. In addition, we will issue $500 million aggregate
principal amount of notes in a private placement and an
additional $200 million aggregate principal amount of
privately placed debt securities. Upon consummation of the
acquisition, SCI and Alderwoods will terminate all commitments
and Alderwoods will repay all outstanding borrowings under their
existing credit facilities.
In connection with the acquisition, on September 7, 2006,
Alderwoods commenced a tender offer to purchase
$200 million of its outstanding 7.75% Senior Notes due
2012 (the Alderwoods 7.75% Notes) and a
solicitation of consents to eliminate substantially all of the
restrictive covenants and certain events of default and to
modify certain other provisions of the indenture relating to the
Alderwoods 7.75% Notes. This tender offer was originally
scheduled to expire on October 5, 2006, but has been
extended to October 26, 2006, to coincide with the
anticipated closing of the acquisition. The tender offer may be
further extended if the closing date of the acquisition is later
than October 26, 2006. The tender offer is conditioned
upon, among other things, the tender of a majority of the
outstanding principal amount of the Alderwoods 7.75% Notes,
the consummation of the acquisition and the financing
transactions described above and other customary conditions. As
of October 5, 2006, approximately $194,190,000 in aggregate
principal amount of the Alderwoods 7.75% Notes, or 97.10% of the
outstanding principal amount of the Alderwoods 7.75% Notes, and
the consents related thereto, were validly tendered. Withdrawal
rights of tendering holders of the Alderwoods 7.75% Notes that
tendered prior to the expiration of the consent solicitation on
September 20, 2006 (the Alderwoods Consent
Date), have expired. The total consideration payable in
respect of Alderwoods 7.75% Notes that were accepted for
payment and validly tendered and not withdrawn prior to the
Alderwoods Consent Date is $1,080.03 per $1,000 principal
amount, which includes a $20.00 consent payment payable only in
respect of Alderwoods 7.75% Notes that were tendered with
consents on or prior to the Alderwoods Consent Date. The total
consideration payable in respect of Alderwoods 7.75% Notes
that are validly tendered after the Alderwoods Consent Date and
on or prior to the expiration date is $1,060.03 per $1,000
principal amount. Accrued and unpaid interest to but excluding
the settlement date will also be paid with respect to all
existing Alderwoods 7.75% Notes purchased in the tender offer.
In addition, on September 7, 2006, SCI commenced a tender
offer to purchase $144.5 million aggregate principal amount
of its outstanding 7.7% Senior Notes due 2009, CUSIP Nos:
817565AXZ; 817565AV6; 817565AW4 (the SCI
7.7% Notes), and a solicitation of consents to
eliminate substantially all of the restrictive covenants and
certain events of default and to modify certain other provisions
of the indenture relating to the SCI 7.7% Notes. This
tender offer was originally scheduled to expire on
October 5, 2006, but has been extended to October 26,
2006, to coincide with the anticipated closing of the
acquisition. The tender offer may be further extended if the
closing date of the acquisition is later than October 26,
2006. The tender offer is conditioned upon, among other things,
the tender of a majority of the outstanding SCI 7.7% notes,
the consummation of the acquisition and the financing
transactions described above and other customary conditions. As
of October 5, 2006, approximately $138,932,000 in aggregate
principal amount of SCI 7.7% Notes, or 96.17% of the outstanding
principal amount of the SCI 7.7% Notes, and the consents related
thereto, were validly tendered. Withdrawal rights of tendering
holders of the SCI 7.7% Notes that tendered prior to the
expiration of the consent solicitation on September 20,
2006 (the SCI Consent Date), have expired. The total
consideration payable in respect of SCI 7.7%
80
Notes that were accepted for payment and validly tendered and
not withdrawn prior to the SCI Consent Date is $1,058.11 per
$1,000 principal amount, which includes a $20.00 consent payment
payable only in respect of SCI 7.7% Notes that were tendered
with consents on or prior to the SCI Consent Date. The total
consideration payable in respect of SCI 7.7% Notes that are
validly tendered after the SCI Consent Date and on or prior to
the expiration date is $1,038.11 per $1,000 principal amount.
Accrued and unpaid interest to but excluding the settlement date
will also be paid with respect to all existing SCI 7.7% Notes
purchased in the tender offer. SCI currently has outstanding a
separate series of 7.7% Notes due 2009, which have
different CUSIP numbers. SCI is not making a tender offer or
consent solicitation for those notes.
Liquidity after the acquisition. After the consummation
of the transactions, we will be highly leveraged. On a pro forma
basis as of June 30, 2006 and after giving effect to the
transactions, we will have outstanding indebtedness of
approximately $2,034.0 million, with reduced near-term
maturities and a more balanced overall maturity schedule. Based
on expected cash balances at closing, we expect to have
approximately $229.9 million available for additional
borrowing under our revolving credit facility (after giving
effect to approximately $70.1 million of outstanding
letters of credit). Our new senior credit facility agreement and
the note purchase agreement evidencing our new privately placed
debt securities contain both affirmative and negative covenants,
including limitations, subject to certain exceptions, on our
ability to incur additional indebtedness (including guarantee
obligations); create liens on assets; enter into sale and
leaseback transactions; engage in mergers, liquidations and
dissolutions; sell assets; enter into leases; pay dividends,
distributions and other payments in respect of capital stock,
and purchase our capital stock in the open market; make
investments, loans or advances; repay subordinated indebtedness
or amend the agreements relating thereto; engage in certain
transactions with affiliates; change our fiscal year; create
restrictions on our ability to receive distributions from
subsidiaries; and change our lines of business; and require us
to meet or exceed certain leverage and interest coverage ratios.
No pro forma adjustments have been made to reflect a reduction
of debt from the application of proceeds expected to be received
in connection with the divestitures.
Upon completion of the acquisition, we intend to focus on the
near-term reduction of our outstanding indebtedness to our
long-term target levels. Through the application of operating
cash flow and proceeds from asset sales to retire pre-payable
debt, we expect to reduce our outstanding debt to approximately
$1.7 billion within the next several years.
SCI expects to execute a consent order with the staff of the FTC
in connection with the acquisition, which will identify certain
properties the FTC will require us to divest as a result of the
acquisition. The consent order will be subject to approval by
the FTC commissioners, which approval is a condition to the
consummation of the acquisition. No final agreement has been
reached with any third party concerning the sale of any such
assets. We believe the divestiture of these assets, together
with the divestiture of other SCI assets that we have identified
for sale, will generate proceeds of approximately
$200 million in the near future, which we expect to use to
repay debt. There can be no assurance that the divestitures
described above will be consummated, or if consummated will
generate the proceeds described above. For purposes of the pro
forma information in this prospectus, the assets to be sold
pursuant to the divestitures have been reclassified on the pro
forma balance sheet as assets held for sale and the results of
operations of these assets have been eliminated from the pro
forma statement of operations. No pro forma adjustments have
been made to reflect any anticipated gain or loss from the
divestitures and no adjustment has been made to reflect any
earnings benefit from the reinvestment of any proceeds from the
divestitures or any reduction of debt from the application of
sales proceeds. In addition, after completion of the
acquisition, we intend to undertake a comprehensive review of
all our integrated operations and we believe there may be
further asset sales as a result of that review in the next six
to 18 months. There can be no assurance that these asset
sales will occur or if they occur that they will be on terms
favorable to us.
We will continue to focus on funding disciplined growth
initiatives that generate increased profitability, revenue and
cash flows. These capital investments include the construction
of high-end cemetery property (such as private family estates)
and the construction of funeral home facilities at existing
cemeteries. Over the next twelve months, giving pro forma effect
to the transactions, we expect to
81
spend approximately $25 million on capital expenditures to
construct new funeral homes, and we expect our total maintenance
capital expenditures to be approximately $125 million. We
will also consider acquisitions that fit our long-term customer
focused strategy, if the expected returns exceed our cost of
capital.
In August 2004, SCIs Board of Directors authorized a
$400.0 million share repurchase program. Under this
program, SCI has purchased 51.1 million shares at an
average cost of $7.10 per share and currently have
$36.7 million authorized for future repurchases. Once we
achieve our leverage targets, we intend to make purchases from
time to time in the open market or through privately negotiated
transactions, subject to market conditions and normal trading
restrictions. Since April 2005, SCI has paid a quarterly cash
dividend of $.025 per share to its shareholders. While we
intend to pay regular quarterly cash dividends for the
foreseeable future, all subsequent dividends are subject to
final determination by our Board of Directors each quarter after
its review of our financial performance.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations, and
Commercial and Contingent Commitments
SCI has incurred various financial obligations and commitments
in the ordinary course of conducting its business. SCI has
contractual obligations requiring future cash payments under
existing contractual arrangements, such as debt maturities,
interest on long-term debt, and employment, consulting and
non-competition agreements. SCI also has commercial and
contingent obligations that result in cash payments only if
certain contingent events occur requiring its performance
pursuant to a funding commitment.
The following table details SCIs known future cash
payments (on an undiscounted basis) related to various
contractual obligations as of December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period | |
|
|
| |
Contractual Obligations |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 2008 | |
|
2009 2010 | |
|
Thereafter | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Current maturities of long-term debt(1)
|
|
$ |
20.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20.7 |
|
Long-term debt maturities(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225.6 |
|
|
|
347.6 |
|
|
|
613.3 |
|
|
|
1,186.5 |
|
Interest obligation on long-term debt(1)
|
|
|
90.2 |
|
|
|
158.2 |
|
|
|
96.9 |
|
|
|
250.4 |
|
|
|
595.7 |
|
Casket purchase agreement(2)
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
Operating lease agreements(3)
|
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
54.9 |
|
|
|
35.1 |
|
|
|
57.7 |
|
|
|
181.8 |
|
Employment, consulting and non-competition agreements(4)
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
21.5 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
49.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$ |
214.6 |
|
|
$ |
460.2 |
|
|
$ |
483.8 |
|
|
$ |
923.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,082.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
SCIs outstanding indebtedness contains standard
provisions, such as payment delinquency default clauses and
change of control clauses. In addition, SCIs new senior
credit facility contains a maximum leverage ratio and a minimum
interest coverage ratio. |
|
(2) |
SCI has executed a purchase agreement with a major casket
manufacturer for its North America operations with an original
minimum commitment of $750 million, covering a six-year
period that expired in 2004. The agreement contained provisions
for annual price adjustments and provided for a one-year
extension to December 31, 2005, which SCI elected to extend
in order to satisfy its commitment. In January 2005, SCI again
amended the original purchase agreement to allow it to continue
purchasing caskets through 2006, subject to price increase
limitations. At December 31, 2005, SCIs remaining
casket purchase commitment under the agreement was
$48.0 million. See note thirteen to SCIs annual
financial statements included in this prospectus for additional
details related to this purchase agreement. |
|
(3) |
The majority of SCIs operating leases contain options to
(i) purchase the property at fair value on the exercise
date, (ii) purchase the property for a value determined at
the inception of the leases, or |
82
|
|
|
(iii) renew for the fair rental value at the end of the
primary lease term. SCIs operating leases at
December 31, 2005, primarily related to funeral service
locations, automobiles, limousines, hearses, cemetery operating
and maintenance equipment and two aircraft. At December 31,
2005, SCI has residual value exposure related to certain
operating leases of $22.2 million. SCI believes that is it
unlikely that it will have to make future cash payments related
to these residual value exposures. In order to eliminate the
variable interest rate risk in SCIs operating margins and
improve the transparency of its financial statements, SCI
amended certain of its transportation lease agreements in the
first quarter of 2006. Based on the amended terms, these leases
have been converted from operating leases to capital leases for
accounting purposes in 2006. |
|
(4) |
SCI has entered into management employment, consulting and
non-competition agreements which contractually require SCI to
make cash payments over the contractual period. The agreements
have been primarily entered into with certain officers and
employees of SCI and former owners of businesses acquired. The
contractual obligation amounts pertain to the total commitment
outstanding under these agreements and may not be indicative of
future expenses to be incurred related to these agreements due
to cost rationalization programs completed by SCI. Agreements
with contractual periods less than one year are excluded. See
note thirteen to SCIs annual financial statements included
in this prospectus for additional details related to these
agreements. |
SCI has not included amounts in this table for payments of
pension contributions and payments for various postretirement
welfare plans and postemployment benefit plans, as such amounts
have not been determined beyond 2005.
The following table details SCIs known potential or
possible future cash payments (on an undiscounted basis) related
to various commercial and contingent obligations as of
December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiration by Period | |
|
|
| |
Commercial and Contingent Obligations |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 2008 | |
|
2009 2010 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Surety obligations(1)
|
|
$ |
285.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
285.7 |
|
Letters of credit(2)
|
|
|
54.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54.7 |
|
Representations and warranties(3)
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
24.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.5 |
|
Income distributions from trust(4)
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and contingent obligations
|
|
$ |
365.6 |
|
|
$ |
24.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
389.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
To support its operations, SCI has engaged certain surety
companies to issue surety bonds on SCIs behalf for
customer financial assurance or as required by state and local
regulations. The surety bonds are primarily obtained to provide
assurance for SCIs preneed funeral and preneed cemetery
obligations, which are appropriately presented as liabilities in
the consolidated balance sheet as Deferred preneed funeral
contract revenues and Deferred cemetery contract
revenues. The total outstanding surety bonds at
December 31, 2005 were $329.3 million. Of this amount,
$313.6 million was related to preneed funeral and preneed
cemetery obligations. When SCI uses surety bonds for preneed
funeral and cemetery obligations, the bond amount required is
based on the calculated trusting requirements as if the contract
was paid in full at the time of sale. When SCI deposits funds
into state-mandated trust funds, however, the amount deposited
is generally based on the amount of cash received and payment
application rules in the state trust requirements. Therefore, in
the event all of the surety companies canceled or did not renew
SCIs outstanding surety bonds, which are generally renewed
for twelve-month periods, SCI would be required to either obtain
replacement assurance or fund approximately $285.7 million,
as of December 31, 2005, primarily into state-mandated
trust accounts. At this time, SCI does not believe it will be
required to fund material future amounts related to these surety
bonds. |
|
(2) |
SCI is occasionally required to post letters of credit, issued
by a financial institution, to secure certain insurance programs
or other obligations. Letters of credit generally authorize the
financial institution to make a payment to the beneficiary upon
the satisfaction of a certain event or the failure to satisfy |
83
|
|
|
an obligation. The letters of credit are generally posted for
one-year terms and are usually automatically renewed upon
maturity until such time as SCI has satisfied the commitment
secured by the letter of credit. SCI is obligated to reimburse
the issuer only if the beneficiary collects on the letter of
credit. SCI believes that it is unlikely it will be required to
fund a claim under its outstanding letters of credit. |
|
(3) |
In addition to the letters of credit described above, SCI
currently has contingent obligations of $33.5 million
related to its asset sale and joint venture transactions. SCI
has agreed to guarantee certain representations and warranties
associated with such disposition transactions with letters of
credit or interest-bearing cash investments. SCI has
interest-bearing cash investments of $6.8 million included
in Deferred charges and other assets pledged as
collateral for certain of these contingent obligations. SCI does
not believe it will ultimately be required to fund to third
parties any claims against these representations and warranties.
During the year ended December 31, 2004, SCI recognized
$35.8 million of contractual obligations related to
representations and warranties associated with the disposition
of its funeral operations in France. The remaining obligations
of $24.1 million at December 31, 2005 is primarily
related to taxes and certain litigation matters. At
June 30, 2006, the remaining obligations totaled
$23.7 million. This amount is recorded in Other
liabilities in SCIs consolidated balance sheet. See
note nineteen to SCIs annual financial statements included
in this prospectus for addition information related to the
disposition of SCIs French operations. |
|
(4) |
In certain states and provinces, SCI has withdrawn allowable
distributable earnings including unrealized gains prior to the
maturity or cancellation of the related contract. In the event
of market declines, SCI may be required to re-deposit portions
or all of these amounts into the respective trusts in some
future period. |
The following table details our known future cash payments (on
an undiscounted basis) related to various contractual
obligations as of June 30, 2006, after giving pro forma
effect to the transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Remainder of | |
|
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 2008 | |
|
2009 2010 | |
|
Thereafter | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Current maturities of long-term debt(1)
|
|
$ |
24.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
24.3 |
|
Long-term debt maturities(1)(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264.9 |
|
|
|
390.3 |
|
|
|
1,354.5 |
|
|
|
2,009.7 |
|
Interest obligation on long-term debt(2)
|
|
|
72.7 |
|
|
|
274.4 |
|
|
|
213.4 |
|
|
|
479.6 |
|
|
|
1,040.1 |
|
Casket purchase agreement(3)
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
Operating lease agreements(4)
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
67.6 |
|
|
|
120.4 |
|
Employment, consulting and non-competition agreements(5)
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
21.5 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
38.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$ |
130.5 |
|
|
$ |
585.0 |
|
|
$ |
626.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,904.0 |
|
|
$ |
3,246.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Our outstanding indebtedness contains standard provisions, such
as payment delinquency default clauses and, in some cases,
change of control clauses. In addition, SCIs bank credit
agreement contains a maximum leverage ratio and a minimum
interest coverage ratio. Current and long-term debt maturities
include capital leases. |
|
(2) |
Interest on revolving credit facility, term loan and privately
placed debt securities assume LIBOR remaining at 5.40%
throughout all periods. |
|
(3) |
SCI has executed a purchase agreement with a major casket
manufacturer for its North America operations with an original
minimum commitment of $750 million, covering a six-year
period that expired in 2004. The agreement contained provisions
for annual price adjustments and provided for a one-year
extension to December 31, 2005, which SCI elected to extend
in order to satisfy its commitment. In January 2005, SCI again
amended the original purchase agreement to allow it to |
84
|
|
|
continue purchasing caskets through 2006, subject to price
increase limitations. At June 30, 2006, SCIs
remaining casket purchase commitment under the agreement was
$12.8 million. |
|
(4) |
Our operating leases at December 31, 2005, primarily
related to funeral service locations, automobiles, limousines,
hearses, cemetery operating and maintenance equipment and two
aircraft. In order to eliminate the variable interest rate risk
in SCIs operating margins and improve the transparency of
its financial statements, SCI amended certain of its
transportation lease agreements in the first quarter of 2006.
Based on the amended terms, these leases have been converted
from operating leases to capital leases for accounting purposes
in 2006. As a result the Company acquired $108,703 of
transportation equipment utilizing capital leases, of which
$102,322 were classified as operating leases in prior periods.
All capital leases are included in current and long-term debt
maturities. |
|
(5) |
SCI has entered into management employment, consulting and
non-competition agreements which contractually require SCI to
make cash payments over the contractual period. The agreements
have been primarily entered into with certain officers and
employees of SCI and former owners of businesses acquired. The
contractual obligation amounts pertain to the total commitment
outstanding under these agreements and may not be indicative of
future expenses to be incurred related to these agreements due
to cost rationalization programs completed by SCI. Agreements
with contractual periods less than one year are excluded. |
We have not included amounts in this table for payments of
pension contributions and payments for various postretirement
welfare plans and postemployment benefit plans, as such amounts
have not been determined beyond 2005.
The following table details our known potential or possible
future cash payments (on an undiscounted basis) related to
various commercial and contingent obligations as of
December 31, 2005, after giving pro forma effect to the
transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiration by Period | |
|
|
| |
Commercial and Contingent Obligations |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 2008 | |
|
2009 2010 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Surety obligations(1)
|
|
$ |
285.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
285.7 |
|
Letters of credit(2)
|
|
|
72.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72.3 |
|
Representations and warranties(3)
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
24.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.5 |
|
Income distributions from trust(4)
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and contingent obligations
|
|
$ |
383.2 |
|
|
$ |
24.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
407.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
To support its operations, SCI has engaged certain surety
companies to issue surety bonds on SCIs behalf for
customer financial assurance or as required by state and local
regulations. The surety bonds are primarily obtained to provide
assurance for SCIs preneed funeral and preneed cemetery
obligations, which are appropriately presented as liabilities in
the consolidated balance sheet as Deferred preneed funeral
contract revenues and Deferred cemetery contract
revenues. The total outstanding surety bonds at
December 31, 2005 were $329.3 million. Of this amount,
$313.6 million was related to preneed funeral and preneed
cemetery obligations. When SCI uses surety bonds for preneed
funeral and cemetery obligations, the bond amount required is
based on the calculated trusting requirements as if the contract
was paid in full at the time of sale. When SCI deposits funds
into state-mandated trust funds, however, the amount deposited
is generally based on the amount of cash received and payment
application rules in the state trust requirements. Therefore, in
the event all of the surety companies canceled or did not renew
SCIs outstanding surety bonds, which are generally renewed
for twelve-month periods, SCI would be required to either obtain
replacement assurance or fund approximately $285.7 million,
as of December 31, 2005, primarily into state-mandated
trust accounts. At this time, SCI does not believe it will be
required to fund material future amounts related to these surety
bonds. |
85
|
|
(2) |
We are occasionally required to post letters of credit, issued
by a financial institution, to secure certain insurance programs
or other obligations. Letters of credit generally authorize the
financial institution to make a payment to the beneficiary upon
the satisfaction of a certain event or the failure to satisfy an
obligation. The letters of credit are generally posted for
one-year terms and are usually automatically renewed upon
maturity until such time as we have satisfied the commitment
secured by the letter of credit. We are obligated to reimburse
the issuer only if the beneficiary collects on the letter of
credit. We believe that it is unlikely we will be required to
fund a claim under its outstanding letters of credit. |
|
(3) |
In addition to the letters of credit described above, SCI
currently has contingent obligations of $33.5 million
related to its asset sale and joint venture transactions. SCI
has agreed to guarantee certain representations and warranties
associated with such disposition transactions with letters of
credit or interest-bearing cash investments. SCI has
interest-bearing cash investments of $6.8 million included
in Deferred charges and other assets pledged as
collateral for certain of these contingent obligations. SCI does
not believe it will ultimately be required to fund to third
parties any claims against these representations and warranties.
During the year ended December 31, 2004, SCI recognized
$35.8 million of contractual obligations related to
representations and warranties associated with the disposition
of its funeral operations in France. The remaining obligations
of $24.1 million at December 31, 2005 is primarily
related to taxes and certain litigation matters. At
June 30, 2006, the remaining obligations totaled
$23.7 million. This amount is recorded in Other
liabilities in SCIs consolidated balance sheet. See
note nineteen to SCIs annual financial statements included
in this prospectus for addition information related to the
disposition of SCIs French operations. |
|
(4) |
In certain states and provinces, SCI has withdrawn allowable
distributable earnings including unrealized gains prior to the
maturity or cancellation of the related contract. In the event
of market declines, SCI may be required to re-deposit portions
or all of these amounts into the respective trusts in some
future period. |
Financial Assurances
In support of SCIs operations, SCI has entered into
arrangements with certain surety companies whereby such
companies agree to issue surety bonds on its behalf as financial
assurance and/or as required by existing state and local
regulations. The surety bonds are used for various business
purposes; however, the majority of the surety bonds issued and
outstanding have been used to support our preneed funeral and
cemetery sales activities. The obligations underlying these
surety bonds assure are recorded on the consolidated balance
sheet as Deferred preneed Funeral revenues and
deferred preneed cemetery revenues. The breakdown of
surety bonds between funeral and cemetery preneed arrangements,
as well as surety bonds for other activities, are described
below. The decrease in preneed funeral and preneed cemetery
surety bonds is primarily the result of the completion of
pre-construction projects, divested locations, and a change in
the type of sales in Florida.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Preneed funeral
|
|
$ |
139.3 |
|
|
$ |
146.7 |
|
|
$ |
132.1 |
|
Preneed cemetery:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merchandise and services
|
|
|
161.8 |
|
|
|
186.7 |
|
|
|
159.6 |
|
|
Pre-construction
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds supporting preneed funeral and cemetery obligations
|
|
|
313.6 |
|
|
|
341.7 |
|
|
|
302.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds supporting preneed business permits
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Other bonds
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total surety bonds outstanding
|
|
$ |
329.3 |
|
|
$ |
352.5 |
|
|
$ |
318.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
When selling preneed funeral and cemetery contracts, SCI may
post surety bonds where allowed by state law, except as noted
below for Florida. SCI posts the surety bonds in lieu of
trusting a certain amount of funds received from the customer.
The amount of the bond posted is generally determined by the
total amount of the preneed contract that would otherwise be
required to be trusted, in accordance with applicable state law.
For the year ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, SCI had
$64.0 million and $102.7 million, respectively, of
cash receipts attributable to bonded sales. For the six months
ended June 30, 2006, SCI had $28.2 million of cash
receipts attributable to bonded sales. These amounts do not
consider reductions associated with taxes, obtaining costs, or
other costs.
Surety bond premiums are paid annually and are automatically
renewable until maturity of the underlying preneed contracts,
unless SCI is given prior notice of cancellation. Except for
cemetery pre-construction bonds (which are irrevocable), the
surety companies generally have the right to cancel the surety
bonds at any time with appropriate notice. In the event a surety
company was to cancel the surety bond, SCI is required to obtain
replacement surety assurance from another surety company or fund
a trust for an amount generally less than the posted bond
amount. SCI does not expect it will be required to fund material
future amounts related to these surety bonds because of lack of
surety capacity.
The applicable Florida law that allowed posting of surety bonds
for preneed contracts expired December 31, 2004; however,
it allowed for preneed contracts entered into prior to
December 31, 2004 to continue to be bonded for the
remaining life of those contracts. Of the total cash receipts
attributable to bonded sales for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004, approximately
$29.9 million and $63.0 million, respectively, were
attributable to the state of Florida. On February 1, 2004,
SCI elected to begin trusting as a financial assurance mechanism
in Florida, rather than surety bonding, on new Florida sales of
preneed funeral and cemetery merchandise and services.
SCIs net trust deposits required in 2005 for new Florida
sales since changing to trust funding were $21.4 million.
SCIs net trust deposits required during 2004 for new trust
funded sales were $15.4 million.
Historical Cash Flow
SCI
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 Compared to Six Months
Ended June 30, 2005 |
Highlights of cash flow for the first six months of 2006
compared to the same period of 2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
Operating activities Cash flows from
operating activities in the first six months of 2006 were
$151.6 million, a decrease of $38.8 million compared
to the first six months of 2005. The first six months of 2005
included a federal income tax refund of $29.0 million.
Additionally, in the first six months of 2006, there were
$16.5 million of long-term incentive compensation payments
related to a 2003 award program. Excluding these items, cash
flows from operating activities for the first six months of 2006
increased $6.7 million compared to the same period in 2005
primarily as a result of the second quarter 2006 receipt of
$7.9 million of previously disputed trust fund proceeds
described in Results of Operations above and improvements in
SCIs DSO for the first half of 2006. |
|
|
Investing activities Cash flows from
investing activities decreased by $40.3 million in the
first six months of 2006 compared to the same period of 2005 due
to a decline in proceeds from divestitures and sales of property
and equipment, reduced distributions from SCIs French
equity investment, and an increase in acquisitions, partially
offset by a favorable change in restricted cash. |
|
|
In the first six months of 2006, SCI received $27.0 million
from divestitures and sales of property and equipment compared
to $56.1 million in the first six months of 2005. In 2006,
SCI also received $11.0 million of proceeds held as an
income tax receivable related to the 2005 sale of its operations
in Chile. SCI also paid $14.7 million in 2006 in cash for
selected strategic acquisitions. |
|
|
In the first six months of 2005, SCI received $21.6 million
in proceeds and distributions from the disposition of its
businesses in Argentina and Uruguay, $32.1 million from its
equity investment in |
87
|
|
|
France and $2.4 million from other sales of property and
equipment. The $20.0 million net source from restricted
cash for the first six months of 2006 compared to the first six
months of 2005 included an $18.1 million deposit of payroll
funds into a restricted account in 2005, partially offset by a
return of $9.2 million in cash collateral previously
pledged in connection with various commercial commitments. In
addition, $11.0 million related to pending deposits that
are no longer reported as restricted cash based on discussions
with the SEC regarding their comment letter. |
|
|
Financing activities Cash used in financing
activities decreased $127.1 million in the first six months
of 2006 compared to the first six months of 2005 primarily due
to a $161.9 million reduction in share repurchases and a
$275.5 million decrease in debt repayments, partially
offset by $291.5 million of proceeds from the issuance of
debt in 2005. SCI also had a $10.5 million increase in
capital lease payments reflecting new capital leases for certain
transportation assets and a $7.0 million increase in
dividend payments in 2006 compared to 2005. |
During the first six months of 2005, SCI repurchased
26.7 million shares of common stock for $189.8 million
compared to 3.4 million shares for $27.9 million in
2006.
SCIs efforts in 2004 and 2005 to extend its debt maturity
schedule resulted in significant decreases in debt payments in
2006. During the second quarter of 2005, SCI issued
$300 million of senior unsecured 7.0% notes due 2017,
and received $291.5 million in net proceeds. SCI used these
proceeds to extinguish $286.2 million of outstanding debt.
SCI did not issue or early retire any debt in 2006. SCI also
paid $3.0 million in scheduled debt payments in the first
half of 2005 compared to $13.7 million in scheduled debt
payments in 2006.
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005 Compared to Years Ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003 |
Highlights of cash flow for the year ended December 31,
2005 compared to the same periods of 2004 and 2003 are as
follows:
|
|
|
Operating activities Cash flows from
operating activities increased by $218.7 million to
$312.9 million in 2005 compared to 2004. The 2004 cash
flows from operating activities of $94.2 million declined
by $280.1 million as compared to the operating cash flows
in 2003. Included in 2005 was a federal income tax refund of
$29.0 million. Included in 2004 was the payment of
$131.1 million related to the resolution of certain
litigation matters, a $20.0 million voluntary cash
contribution to SCIs pension plan, and the payment of
$11.4 million to retire life insurance policy loans related
to SCIs SERP and Senior SERP retirement programs. Included
in 2003 was a tax refund of $94.5 million and disbursements
of $27.1 million (net of insurance recoveries) related to
the resolution of certain litigation matters. |
|
|
In addition to the items mentioned above, the increase in
operating cash flows in 2005 as compared to 2004 is the result
of an extra bi-weekly cash payroll payment of approximately
$19.0 million in 2004, an approximate $13.0 million
decrease in bonus payments, an increase in net trust
withdrawals, and a $16.7 million decrease in cash interest
paid. These net sources of cash were partially offset by cash
outflows of $16.0 million associated with SCIs cash
funding of its 401(k) matches in 2005 (compared with funding
through the use of stock in 2004) and a $10.2 million
increase in cash outflows to improve internal controls in order
to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Cash
receipts from Kenyon increased $15.0 million (offset by an
$18.8 million increase in Kenyon expenses) in 2005 compared
to the same period in 2004 due to Kenyons involvement with
the incidents in Asia, Greece and the U.S. gulf coast.
Additionally, cash flows from operating activities provided by
SCIs former operations in France decreased
$18.3 million in 2005 as a result of the sale of its French
operations in March 2004. |
|
|
The decrease in operating cash flows in 2004 as compared to 2003
was also driven by the extra
bi-weekly cash payroll
payment in 2004 and the divestiture of SCIs operations in
France. Cash flow from operating activities in France declined
$14.7 million from $33.0 million in 2003 to
$18.3 million for the short period in 2004 prior to the
disposition. The remaining decline was attributable to the |
88
|
|
|
replacement of bonding with trust funding for new preneed sales
in Florida and working capital increases primarily associated
with decreases in accounts receivable collections. These net
cash outflows were partially offset by a $25.6 million
decrease in cash interest payments due to significant debt
reductions during 2004. |
|
|
SCI did not pay federal income taxes in 2005, 2004 or 2003.
Because of its significant net operating loss carryforwards SCI
does not expect to pay federal income taxes until 2007. Foreign,
state and local income tax payments declined $4.2 million
to $6.6 million in 2005 as compared to $10.8 million
in 2004 and $14.5 million in 2003 primarily as a result of
less foreign taxes paid due to the disposition of SCIs
French operations in 2004. |
|
|
Investing activities Cash flows from
investing activities declined by $118.5 million in 2005
compared to 2004 primarily due to a decline in proceeds from
sales of international businesses and equity investments and a
decrease in net withdrawals from restricted funds primarily
related to various commercial commitments. Partially offsetting
these decreases was the payment in 2004 of $51.7 million to
satisfy a contingent purchase obligation associated with the
1998 acquisition of SCIs operations in Chile. The
$326.9 million improvement in investing cash flows in 2004
as compared to 2003 was driven by proceeds from dispositions and
an increase in net withdrawals from restricted funds, partially
offset by the 2004 payment of the contingent purchase obligation
previously mentioned. |
|
|
In 2005, SCI received $90.4 million from the disposition of
its cemetery operation in Chile, $42.7 million related to
the collection of a
10,000 note
receivable and the redemption of preferred equity certificates
related to SCIs equity investment in its former French
operations (of which $39.7 million is reported as an
investing activity), and $21.6 million from the disposition
of its Argentina and Uruguay businesses. |
|
|
In March 2004, SCI sold its funeral operations in France and
received net cash proceeds of $281.7 million. Following a
successful public offering transaction of SCIs former
United Kingdom affiliate during the second quarter of 2004, SCI
liquidated its debt and equity holdings in its former United
Kingdom affiliate and collected $53.8 million in aggregate,
of which $49.2 million is reported as an investing activity. |
|
|
Financing activities Cash used in financing
activities decreased $9.6 million in 2005 compared to 2004
primarily due to an increase in proceeds from the issuance of
debt and a decrease in debt extinguishments, partially offset by
an increase in share repurchases and dividend payments. The
$35.7 million increase in cash used for financing in 2004
as compared to 2003 was driven by debt extinguishments and stock
repurchases. |
|
|
Payments of debt were $85.8 million in 2005 primarily
related to the $63.5 million final payment of
6.00% notes due December 2005 and $14.5 million in
note payments. Payments of debt were $177.8 million in 2004
primarily related to the repayment of $111.2 million of the
7.375% notes due 2004 and $50.8 million of
8.375% notes due in 2004. |
|
|
Proceeds from the issuance of debt were $291.5 million in
2005 due to the issuance of senior unsecured 7.00% notes
due June 15, 2017 for $300.0 million, net of
$1.0 million of debt issue costs. In 2004, proceeds of
$241.4 million were due to the issuance of 6.75% notes
due April 1, 2016 in the amount of $250.0 million, net
of $0.4 million of debt issue costs. |
|
|
SCI repurchased 31.0 million shares of its common stock for
$225.1 million in 2005 and 16.7 million shares of
common stock for $110.3 million in 2004. |
|
|
SCI paid $22.6 million of cash dividends during 2005
related to the quarterly cash dividend recently reinstated by
the Board of Directors. There were no dividend payments in 2004
or 2003. |
89
Alderwoods
Alderwoods derives the majority of its cash from atneed funeral
and cemetery activities. Cash flow is also impacted by the
funeral and cemetery preneed activities.
|
|
|
Twenty-Four Weeks Ended June 17, 2006 Compared to
Twenty-Four Weeks Ended June 18, 2005 |
Net cash from continuing operating activities was
$40.3 million for the 24 weeks ended June 17,
2006, compared to $70.9 million for the corresponding
period in 2005. The decrease was primarily due to the following
three components from the corresponding period in 2005
(i) a $18.1 million in withdrawals of excess funds
from funeral and cemetery trusts resulting from
Alderwoodss ongoing review process;
(ii) $16.1 million related to collateral for liability
lines of insurance coverage replaced with a letter of credit and
(iii) a $9.1 million payment in connection with the US
Trustee bankruptcy fee.
Alderwoodss insurance subsidiary is subject to certain
state regulations that restrict distributions, loans and
advances from the subsidiary to Alderwoods and its other
subsidiaries. Dividends are only distributable after regulatory
approval is obtained. The cash inflows from operations of the
insurance subsidiary are primarily generated from insurance
premiums, all of which are invested in insurance invested assets.
Net cash used in continuing investing activities was
$24.9 million for the 24 weeks ended June 17,
2006, compared to $22.9 million for the corresponding
period in 2005.
Net cash used in continuing financing activities was
$14.5 million for the 24 weeks ended June 17,
2006, compared to $52.7 million for the corresponding
period in 2005. The decrease of $38.2 million was primarily
due to lower repayments of debt during the 24 weeks ended
June 17, 2006, compared to the corresponding period in 2005.
|
|
|
Fifty-Two Weeks Ended December 31, 2005 Compared to
Fifty-Two Weeks Ended January 1, 2005 |
Net cash from continuing operating activities was
$147.4 million for the 52 weeks ended
December 31, 2005, compared to $104.3 million for the
52 weeks ended January 1, 2005. The increase was
primarily due to $25.4 million in withdrawals of excess
funds from funeral and cemetery trusts resulting from
Alderwoodss ongoing review of these trusts (which is
substantially complete), $16.1 million related to
collateral for liability lines of insurance coverage replaced
with a letter of credit and the collection of an
$11.5 million settlement for notes receivables previously
recorded as an allowance. The increase is partially offset by
the payment of $9.1 million as settlement of the
U.S. trustee bankruptcy fee.
Net cash used in continuing investing activities was
$69.0 million for the 52 weeks ended December 31,
2005, compared to $67.9 million for the 52 weeks ended
January 1, 2005. The increase was primarily due to the
increase of $5.3 million in purchase of property and
equipment partially offset by a decrease of $4.4 million in
net purchase of insurance assets.
Net cash used in continuing financing activities was
$87.7 million for the 52 weeks ended December 31,
2005, compared to $192.5 million for the 52 weeks
ended January 1, 2005. The decrease of $104.8 million
was primarily due to the lower net repayment of debt during the
52 weeks ended December 31, 2005, compared to the
52 weeks ended January 1, 2005.
For the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005, the majority
of the net proceeds of $23.7 million from the sale of
Alderwoodss operating locations and excess real estate
were used to further reduce long term debt.
Critical Accounting Policies
After the acquisition, the critical accounting policies of SCI
will be the critical accounting policies of the combined
company. Set forth below are the critical accounting policies of
each of SCI and Alderwoods prior to the acquisition.
90
SCI
SCIs consolidated financial statements are impacted by the
accounting policies used and the estimates and assumptions made
by management during their preparation. Estimates and
assumptions affect the carrying values of assets and liabilities
and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the
balance sheet date. Actual results could differ from such
estimates due to uncertainties associated with the methods and
assumptions underlying SCIs critical accounting
measurements. The following is a discussion of SCIs
critical accounting policies pertaining to revenue recognition,
preneed funeral and cemetery contracts, the impairment or
disposal of long-lived assets, and the use of estimates.
Revenue Recognition
Funeral revenue is recognized when funeral services are
performed. SCIs trade receivables primarily consist of
amounts due for funeral services already performed. Revenue
associated with cemetery merchandise and services is recognized
when the service is performed or merchandise is delivered.
Revenue associated with cemetery property interment rights is
recognized in accordance with the retail land sales provision of
SFAS No. 66, Accounting for the Sales of Real
Estate (SFAS 66). Under SFAS 66, revenue
from constructed cemetery property is not recognized until a
minimum percentage (10%) of the sales price has been collected.
Revenue related to the preneed sale of unconstructed cemetery
property is deferred until it is constructed and 10% of the
sales price is collected.
When a customer enters into a preneed funeral trust contract,
the entire purchase price is deferred and the revenue is
recognized at the time of maturity. The revenues associated with
a preneed cemetery contract, however, may be recognized as
different contract events occur. Preneed sales of cemetery
interment rights (cemetery burial property) are recognized when
a minimum of 10% of the sales price has been collected and the
property has been constructed or is available for interment. For
personalized marker merchandise, with the customers
direction generally obtained at the time of sale, SCI can choose
to order, store, and transfer title to the customer. Upon the
earlier of vendor storage of these items or delivery in
SCIs cemetery, SCI recognizes the associated revenues and
record the cost of sale. For services and non-personalized
merchandise (such as vaults), SCI defer the revenues until the
services are performed and the merchandise is delivered.
Preneed Funeral and Cemetery
Activities
In addition to selling SCIs products and services to
client families at the time of need, SCI sells price guaranteed
preneed funeral and cemetery contracts which provide for future
funeral or cemetery services and merchandise. A preneed
arrangement is a means through which a customer contractually
agrees to the terms of a funeral service, cremation service,
and/or cemetery burial interment right, merchandise or cemetery
service to be performed or provided in the future (that is, in
advance of when needed or preneed).
While some customers may pay for their preneed funeral or
cemetery contract in a single payment, most preneed funeral and
cemetery contracts are sold on an installment basis over a
period of one to seven years. On these installment contracts,
SCI receives, on average, a down payment at the time of sale of
approximately 10%. SCI revised its policy for finance charges on
preneed cemetery installment contracts in the second half of
2005. Based on this revision, preneed cemetery installment
contracts generally now include a finance charge ranging from
9.9% to 10.9% depending on the payment period and state or
provincial laws. Unlike cemetery installment contracts, the
majority of SCIs preneed funeral installment contracts
have not included a finance charge. After test marketing a
finance charge program for preneed funeral trust contracts
during the fourth quarter of 2004, SCI implemented a finance
charge program in five core trust states during 2005, which
represent approximately 55% of its preneed funeral trust
production.
Since preneed funeral and cemetery services or merchandise will
not be provided until some time in the future, most states and
provinces require that all or a portion of the funds collected
from customers on preneed funeral and cemetery contracts be paid
into merchandise and service trusts until the merchandise
91
is delivered or the service is performed. In certain situations,
where permitted by state or provincial laws, SCI posts a surety
bond as financial assurance for a certain amount of the preneed
funeral or cemetery contract in lieu of placing funds into trust
accounts. Alternatively, where allowed, customers may choose to
purchase a life insurance or annuity policy from third party
insurance companies to fund their preneed funeral. Only certain
of these customer funding options may be applicable in any given
market we serve. SCI does not fund preneed cemetery contracts
with insurance policies.
Trust funded preneed funeral and cemetery contracts: The
funds deposited into trust (in accordance with various state and
provincial laws) are invested by independent trustees in
accordance with the investment guidelines established by statute
or, where the prudent investor rule is applicable, the
guidelines established by the Investment Committee of our Board
of Directors. The trustees utilize professional investment
advisors to select and monitor the money managers that make the
individual investment decisions in accordance with the
guidelines. SCI retains any funds above the amounts required to
be deposited into trust accounts and uses them for working
capital purposes, generally to offset the selling and
administrative costs of the preneed programs. State or
provincial law governs the timing of the required deposits into
the trust accounts, which generally ranges from five to
45 days after receipt of the funds from the customer.
Investment earnings associated with the trust investments are
expected to mitigate the inflationary costs of providing the
preneed funeral and cemetery services and merchandise in the
future for the prices that were guaranteed at the time of sale.
As a result of the adoption of the revised Financial Accounting
Standards Board Interpretation
No. 46,Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities, an Interpretation of Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51 (FIN 46R) in 2004, the
preneed funeral and cemetery trust assets have been consolidated
and are recorded in SCIs consolidated balance sheet at
market value in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 115, Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities
(SFAS 115). Investment earnings on trust assets are
generally accumulated in the trust and distributed as the
revenue associated with the preneed funeral or cemetery contract
is recognized or cancelled by the customer. In certain states
and provinces, the trusts are allowed to distribute a portion of
the investment earnings to us prior to that date.
Prior to January 1, 2005, direct selling costs incurred
pursuant to the sales of trust funded preneed funeral and
cemetery contracts were deferred and included in Deferred
charges and other assets in the consolidated balance sheet.
The deferred selling costs were expensed in proportion to the
corresponding revenues when recognized. Other selling costs
associated with the sales and marketing of preneed funeral and
cemetery contracts (e.g., lead procurements costs, brochures and
marketing materials, advertising and administrative costs) were
expensed as incurred.
Beginning January 1, 2005, SCI made an accounting change to
expense as incurred all direct selling costs associated with the
sales of trust funded preneed funeral and cemetery contracts.
If a preneed funeral or cemetery contract is cancelled prior to
delivery, state or provincial law determines the amount of the
refund owed to the customer, if any, including the amount of the
attributed investment earnings. Upon cancellation, SCI receives
the amount of principal deposited to trust and previously
undistributed net investment earnings and, where required, issue
a refund to the customer. SCI retains excess funds, if any, and
recognize the attributed investment earnings (net of any
investment earnings payable to the customer) as revenue in our
consolidated statement of operations. In certain jurisdictions,
SCI may be obligated to fund any shortfall if the amounts
deposited by the customer exceed the funds in trust. Based on
its historical experience, SCI has included a cancellation
reserve for preneed funeral and cemetery contracts in its
consolidated balance sheet of $112.0 million as of
December 31, 2005 and of $113.8 million as of
June 30, 2006.
The cash flow activity over the life of a trust funded preneed
funeral or cemetery contract from the date of sale to its
recognition or cancellation is captured in the line
item Net effect of preneed funeral or cemetery
production and maturities/deliveries and Net income
(loss) in the consolidated statement of cash flows. While
the contract is outstanding, cash flow is provided by the amount
retained from funds collected from the customer and any
distributed investment earnings. Prior to January 1, 2005,
this amount
92
was reduced by the payment of preneed deferred selling costs.
The effect of amortizing preneed deferred selling costs was
reflected in Depreciation and amortization in the
consolidated statement of cash flows. Effective January 1,
2005, the payment of direct selling costs associated with trust
funded preneed contracts is reflected in the consolidated
statement of cash flows as cash flows from operating activities
in the line item Net income (loss), since such direct
selling costs are expensed as incurred. At the time of death
maturity, SCI receives the principal and undistributed
investment earnings from the funeral trust and any remaining
receivable due from the customer. At the time of delivery or
storage of cemetery merchandise and service items for which we
were required to deposit funds to trust, SCI receives the
principal and undistributed investment earnings from the
cemetery trust. There is generally no remaining receivable due
from the customer, as our policy is to deliver preneed cemetery
merchandise and service items only upon payment of the contract
balance in full. This cash flow at the time of service, delivery
or storage is generally less than the associated revenue
recognized, thus reducing cash flow from operating activities.
The tables below detail the North America results of trust
funded preneed funeral and cemetery production for the years
ended December 31, 2005 and 2004. The increase in preneed
funeral trust production in 2005 relates primarily to a
significant shift from the sale of insurance contracts to trust
contracts in California and Colorado.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
June 30, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Funeral
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed trust funded (including bonded):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production
|
|
$ |
131.9 |
|
|
$ |
113.9 |
|
|
$ |
64.6 |
|
|
Sales production (number of contracts)
|
|
|
35,490 |
|
|
|
33,286 |
|
|
|
15,241 |
|
|
Sales maturities
|
|
$ |
160.9 |
|
|
$ |
161.7 |
|
|
$ |
86.9 |
|
|
Sales maturities (number of contracts)
|
|
|
40,368 |
|
|
|
39,418 |
|
|
|
20,294 |
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed
|
|
$ |
307.4 |
|
|
$ |
303.4 |
|
|
$ |
160.9 |
|
|
Atneed
|
|
|
210.5 |
|
|
|
197.7 |
|
|
|
111.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales production
|
|
$ |
517.9 |
|
|
$ |
501.1 |
|
|
$ |
271.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance funded preneed funeral contracts: Where
permitted, customers may arrange their preneed funeral contract
by purchasing a life insurance or annuity policy from third
party insurance companies, for which SCI earns a commission for
being the general agent for the insurance company. These general
agency commissions (GA revenues) are based on a percentage per
contract sold and are recognized as funeral revenues when the
insurance purchase transaction between the customer and third
party insurance provider is completed. Direct selling costs
incurred pursuant to the sale of insurance funded preneed
funeral contracts are expensed as incurred. The policy amount of
the insurance contract between the customer and the third party
insurance company generally equals the amount of the preneed
funeral contract. However, SCI does not reflect the unfulfilled
insurance funded preneed funeral contract amounts in our
consolidated balance sheet.
The third party insurance company collects funds related to the
insurance contract directly from the customer. The life
insurance contracts include increasing death benefit provisions,
which are expected to offset the inflationary costs of providing
the preneed funeral services and merchandise in the future for
the prices that were guaranteed at the time of the preneed sale.
These death benefits payable by third party insurance companies
increase annually pursuant to the terms of the life insurance
policies purchased in advance of need by SCIs customers to
fund their funerals. The customer/policy holder assigns the
policy
93
benefits to SCIs funeral home to pay for the preneed
funeral contract at the time of need. Approximately 60% of
SCIs 2005 North America preneed funeral production is
insurance funded preneed funeral contracts.
Additionally, SCI may receive cash overrides based on achieving
certain dollar volume targets of life insurance policies sold as
a result of marketing agreements entered into in connection with
the sale of SCIs insurance subsidiaries in 2000. These
overrides are recorded in Other income, net in the consolidated
statement of operations.
If a customer cancels the insurance funded preneed funeral
contract prior to death, the insurance company pays the cash
surrender value under the insurance policy directly to the
customer. If the contract was outstanding for less than one
year, the insurance company generally charges back the GA
revenues and overrides SCI received on the contract. An
allowance for these charge backs is included in the consolidated
balance sheet based on SCIs historical charge back
experience totaling $3.1 million and $3.6 million in
2005 and 2004, respectively.
Because insurance funded preneed funeral contracts are not
reflected in SCIs consolidated balance sheet, the cash
flow activity associated with these contracts generally occurs
only at the time of sale and at death or cancellation, and is
recorded as cash flows from operating activities within
SCIs funeral segment. Upon execution of the contract, the
GA revenues and overrides received net of the direct selling
costs provide a net source of cash flow. If the insurance
contract cancels within one year following the date of sale, our
cash flow is reduced by the charge back of GA revenues and
overrides. At death maturity, the insurance funded preneed
funeral contracts are included in funeral trade accounts
receivable and funeral revenues when the funeral service is
performed. Proceeds from the life insurance policies are used to
satisfy the receivables due. The insurance proceeds (which
include the increasing death benefit) less the funds used to
provide the funeral goods and services provide a net source of
cash flow.
The table below details the North America results of insurance
funded preneed funeral production for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the number of contracts
associated with that net production. In 2005, SCI began charging
back preneed funeral insurance production for all cancellations
of contracts greater than one year old. These charge backs
amounted to $21.2 million in 2005. The decrease in preneed
funeral insurance production in 2005 relates to the change
related to cancellations coupled with a significant shift from
the sale of insurance contracts to trust contracts in California
and Colorado.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended |
|
Six Months |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
Funeral
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed trust funded (including bonded):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production(1)
|
|
$ |
193.4 |
|
|
$ |
238.6 |
|
|
$ |
96.1 |
|
Sales production (number of contracts)
|
|
|
42,221 |
|
|
|
51,533 |
|
|
|
18,729 |
|
General agency revenue
|
|
$ |
27.6 |
|
|
$ |
28.3 |
|
|
$ |
16.6 |
|
Sales maturities
|
|
$ |
194.0 |
|
|
$ |
197.2 |
|
|
$ |
96.0 |
|
Sales maturities (number of contracts)
|
|
|
41,640 |
|
|
|
43,508 |
|
|
|
20,189 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Amounts are not included in the consolidated balance sheet |
North America backlog of preneed funeral and cemetery
contracts: The following table reflects the North America
backlog of trust funded deferred preneed funeral and cemetery
contract revenues (market and cost bases) including amounts
related to Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery
trusts at December 31, 2005 and 2004. Additionally, SCI
has reflected the North America backlog of unfulfilled insurance
funded contracts (not included in our consolidated balance
sheet) and total North America backlog of preneed funeral
contract revenues at December 31, 2005 and 2004. The
backlog amounts presented are reduced by an amount that SCI
believes will cancel before maturity based on its historical
experience.
94
The table also reflects the North America trust funded preneed
funeral and cemetery receivables and trust investments
(investments at market and cost bases) associated with the
backlog of trust funded deferred preneed funeral and cemetery
contract revenues, net of an estimated cancellation allowance.
The cost and market values associated with funeral and cemetery
trust investments included in the assets associated with the
backlog of trust funded deferred preneed funeral and cemetery
revenues at December 31, 2005 and 2004 are computed as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Cost reflects the investment (net of redemptions) of control
holders in common trust funds, mutual funds and private equity
investments. |
|
|
|
Market reflects the fair market value of securities or cash held
by the common trust funds, mutual funds at published values and
the estimated market value of private equity investments
(including debt as well as the estimated fair value related to
the contract holders equity in majority owned real estate
investments). |
The market value of funeral and cemetery trust investments was
based primarily on quoted market prices at December 31,
2005 and 2004. The difference between the backlog and asset
amounts represents the contracts for which SCI has posted surety
bonds as financial assurance in lieu of trusting, the amounts
collected from customers that were not required to be deposited
to trust and allowable cash distributions from trust assets. The
table also reflects the amounts expected to be received from
insurance companies from the assignment of policy proceeds
related to insurance funded funeral contracts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America Funeral | |
|
|
| |
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
June 30, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Market | |
|
Cost | |
|
Market | |
|
Cost | |
|
Market | |
|
Cost | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Backlog of trust funded deferred preneed funeral revenues(1)
|
|
$ |
1,495.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,482.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,475.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,440.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,508.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,507.7 |
|
Backlog of insurance funded preneed funeral revenues(2)
|
|
$ |
2,092.1 |
|
|
$ |
2,092.1 |
|
|
$ |
2,129.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,129.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,132.8 |
|
|
$ |
2,132.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total backlog of preneed funeral revenues
|
|
$ |
3,587.6 |
|
|
$ |
3,574.7 |
|
|
$ |
3,605.4 |
|
|
$ |
3,570.3 |
|
|
$ |
3,641.4 |
|
|
$ |
3,640.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets associated with backlog of trust funded deferred preneed
funeral revenues, net of estimated allowance for cancellation
|
|
$ |
1,158.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,145.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,165.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,130.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,164.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,163.4 |
|
Insurance policies associated with insurance funded deferred
preneed funeral revenues, net of estimated allowance for
cancellation(2)
|
|
$ |
2,092.1 |
|
|
$ |
2,092.1 |
|
|
$ |
2,129.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,129.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,132.8 |
|
|
$ |
2,132.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets associated with backlog of preneed funeral revenues
|
|
$ |
3,250.8 |
|
|
$ |
3,238.0 |
|
|
$ |
3,295.3 |
|
|
$ |
3,260.1 |
|
|
$ |
3,297.2 |
|
|
$ |
3,296.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America Cemetery | |
|
|
| |
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
June 30, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Market | |
|
Cost | |
|
Market | |
|
Cost | |
|
Market | |
|
Cost | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Backlog of deferred cemetery revenues(1)
|
|
$ |
1,644.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,600.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,682.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,605.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,672.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,637.3 |
|
Assets associated with backlog of deferred cemetery revenues,
net of estimated allowance for cancellation
|
|
$ |
1,157.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,119.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,237.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,170.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,151.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,120.7 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes amounts reflected as Non-controlling interest in
funeral and cemetery trusts in the consolidated balance
sheet, net of estimated allowance for cancellation. |
|
(2) |
Insurance funded preneed funeral contracts, net of estimated
allowance for cancellation are not included in the consolidated
balance sheet. |
95
Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets
SCI tests for impairment of goodwill using a two-step approach
as prescribed in SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142). The first
step of SCIs goodwill impairment test compares the fair
value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including
goodwill. SCI does not record an impairment of goodwill in
instances where the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its
carrying amount. The second step of SCIs goodwill
impairment test is required only in situations where the
carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value as
determined in the first step. In such instances, SCI compares
the implied fair value of goodwill (as defined in SFAS 142)
to its carrying amount of goodwill. If the carrying amount of
reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that
goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to
that excess. Fair market value of a reporting unit is determined
using a calculation based on multiples of revenue and multiples
of EBITDA, or earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization, of both SCI and its competitors. Based on
SCIs impairment tests at September 30, 2005 and
September 30, 2004, SCI concluded that there was no
impairment of goodwill in accordance with SFAS 142.
SCI reviews its remaining long-lived assets for impairment when
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
the asset may not be recoverable, in accordance with
SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment
or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS 144).
SFAS 144 requires that long-lived assets to be held and
used are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or fair
value. Assets to be disposed of and assets not expected to
provide any future service potential are recorded at the lower
of their carrying amount or fair value less estimated cost to
sell.
In November 2005, SCI sold 21 cemeteries and six funeral homes
to StoneMor Partners LP. In the third quarter of 2005, SCI
committed to a plan to sell these locations and classified these
properties as held for sale. Pursuant to its impairment policy
under SFAS 144, we recorded an impairment charge of
$25.3 million in our cemetery segment and $4.7 million
in its funeral segment.
During the second quarter of 2004, SCI committed to a plan to
divest its funeral and cemetery operations in Argentina and
Uruguay. Upon this triggering event, in June 2004, SCI tested
these operations for impairment in accordance with
SFAS 144. As a result of this impairment test, SCI recorded
an impairment charge of $15.2 million in its second quarter
2004 consolidated financial statements. At December 31,
2003, SCI had no recorded goodwill associated with Argentina and
Uruguay. As a result, SCI did not perform a SFAS 142 test
in 2003 for these operations.
In January 2003, SCI classified the France operating assets held
for sale and ceased depreciation. In 2004, SCI sold its funeral
operations in France and then purchased a 25% equity interest in
the total equity capital of the newly formed entity.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions.
These estimates and assumptions affect the carrying values of
assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and
liabilities at the balance sheet date. Actual results could
differ from such estimates due to uncertainties associated with
the methods and assumptions underlying our critical accounting
measurements. Key estimates used by management, among others,
include:
|
|
|
Allowances SCI provides various allowances
and/or cancellation reserves for our funeral and cemetery
preneed and at need receivables, as well as for its preneed
funeral and preneed cemetery deferred revenues. These allowances
are based on an analysis of historical trends and include, where
applicable, collection and cancellation activity. After
30 days, atneed funeral receivables are considered past
due. Collections are managed by the locations until a receivable
is 180 days delinquent, at which time it is written off and
sent to a collection agency. These estimates are impacted by a
number of factors, including changes in economy, relocation, and
demographic or competitive changes in our areas of operation. |
96
|
|
|
Valuation of trust investments With the
implementation of revised FASB Interpretation No. 46,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an
Interpretation of Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51 (FIN 46R), as of
March 31, 2004, SCI replaced receivables due from trust
assets recorded at cost with the actual trust investments
recorded at market value. The trust investments include
marketable securities that are classified as available-for-sale
in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in
Debt and Equity Securities. Where quoted market prices
are not available, SCI obtains estimates of fair value from the
managers of the private equity funds, which are based on the
market value of the underlying real estate and private equity
investments. These market values are based on contract offers
for the real estate or the managers appraisals of the
venture capital funds. |
|
|
Legal liability reserves Contingent
liabilities, principally for legal liability matters, are
recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred
and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.
Liabilities accrued for legal matters require judgments
regarding projected outcomes and range of loss based on
historical experience and recommendations of legal counsel.
However, litigation is inherently unpredictable, and excessive
verdicts do occur. SCIs legal exposures and the ultimate
outcome of these legal proceedings could be material to
operating results or cash flows in any given quarter or year. |
|
|
Depreciation of long-lived assets SCI
depreciates its long-lived assets over their estimated useful
lives. These estimates of useful lives may be affected by such
factors as changing market conditions or changes in regulatory
requirements. |
|
|
Income taxes SCI ability to realize the
benefit of certain of its deferred tax assets requires it to
achieve certain future earnings levels. SCI has established a
valuation allowance against a portion of its deferred tax assets
and could be required to further adjust that valuation allowance
if market conditions change materially and future earnings are,
or are projected to be, significantly different from our current
estimates. SCI intends to permanently reinvest the unremitted
earnings of certain of its foreign subsidiaries in those
businesses outside the United States and, therefore, have not
provided for deferred federal income taxes on such unremitted
foreign earnings. |
|
|
A number of years may elapse before particular tax matters, for
which SCI has established accruals, are audited and finally
resolved. The number of tax years with open tax audits varies
depending on the tax jurisdiction. In the United States, the
Internal Revenue Service is currently examining SCIs tax
returns for 1999 through 2002 and various state jurisdictions
are auditing years through 2004. While it is often difficult to
predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any
particular tax matter, SCI believes that its accruals reflect
the probable outcome of known tax contingencies. Unfavorable
settlement of any particular issue would reduce a deferred tax
asset or require the use of cash. Favorable resolution could
result in reduced income tax expense reported in the financial
statements in the future. Our tax accruals are presented in the
balance sheet within Deferred income taxes and Other
liabilities. |
|
|
Pension cost SCIs pension plans are
frozen with no benefits accruing to participants except
interest. SCIs pension costs and liabilities are
actuarially determined based on certain assumptions, including
the discount rate used to compute future benefit obligations. On
January 1, 2004, SCI changed its method of accounting for
gains and losses on pension assets and obligations to recognize
such gains and losses in our consolidated statement of
operations during the year in which they occur. Therefore, in
2005 and 2004, the concept of an expected rate of return on plan
assets is not applicable. In 2003 and prior years, it was
SCIs policy to use an expected rate for return on assets
comparable to rates of return on high-quality fixed income
investments available and expected to be available during the
period to maturity of SCIs pension benefits. SCI used a
9.0% assumed rate of return on plan assets in 2003 as a result
of a high allocation of equity securities within the plan assets. |
|
|
Discount rates used to determine pension obligations for
SCIs pension plans were 5.75%, 6.00% and 6.25% for the
years ended 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively. SCI bases the
discount rate used to compute future benefit obligations using
an analysis of expected future benefit payments. SCI verifies |
97
|
|
|
the reasonableness of the discount rate by comparing its rate to
the rate earned on high-quality fixed income investments, such
as the Moodys Aa index, high-quality fixed income
investments. At December 31, 2005, 55% of SCIs plan
assets were invested in core diversified and market neutral
hedge funds, 33% of the plan assets were invested in equity
securities and the remaining 12% of plan assets were fixed
income securities. As of December 31, 2005, the equity
securities were invested approximately 58% in
U.S. Large Cap investments, 21% in
international equities and 21% in U.S. Small
Cap investments. In connection with a $20 million
infusion of funds into SCIs plan in early 2004, SCI
rebalanced the plan assets to have a lower percentage invested
in traditional equity securities and fixed income securities and
instead incorporate investments into hedge funds. SCI believes
that over time this reallocation will reduce the volatility and
limit the negative impact of its investment returns. |
|
|
A sensitivity analysis of the net periodic benefit cost was
modeled to assess the impact that changing discount rates could
have on pre-tax earnings. The sensitivity analysis assumes a
0.25% adverse change to the discount rate with all other
variables held constant. Using this model, SCIs pre-tax
earnings would have decreased by less than $1.0 million, or
less than $.01 per diluted share, for the year ended
December 31, 2005. |
|
|
Insurance loss reserves SCI purchases
comprehensive general liability, morticians and cemetery
professional liability, automobile liability and workers
compensation insurance coverages structured with high
deductibles. This high deductible insurance program results in
SCI being primarily self-insured for claims and associated costs
and losses covered by these policies. Historical insurance
industry experience indicates a high degree of inherent
variability in assessing the ultimate amount of losses
associated with casualty insurance claims. This is especially
true with respect to liability and workers compensation
exposures due to the extended period of time that transpires
between when the claim might occur and the full settlement of
such claim, often many years. SCI continually evaluates loss
estimates associated with claims and losses related to these
insurance coverages and falling within the deductible of each
coverage through the use of qualified and independent actuaries.
Assumptions based on factors such as claim settlement patterns,
claim development trends, claim frequency and severity patterns,
inflationary trends and data reasonableness will generally
effect the analysis and determination of the best
estimate of the projected ultimate claim losses. The
results of these actuarial evaluations are used to both analyze
and adjust our insurance loss reserves. |
|
|
SCIs independent actuaries used five actuarial methods
generally accepted by the Casualty Actuarial Society to arrive
at an estimate of a range that we refer to as reasonably
possible. The Actuarial Standard of Practice No. 36
(ASOP 36 published by the American Academy of Actuaries) states:
A range of reasonable estimates is a range of estimates
that could be produced by appropriate actuarial methods or
alternative sets of assumptions that the actuary judges to be
reasonable. Methods used to determine SCIs
reasonably possible range are: paid and incurred loss
development methods; frequency-severity methods; and paid and
incurred Bornhuetter-Ferguson methods. All of these methods were
used to determine SCIs reasonably possible range of
insurance loss reserves for the years ended December 31,
2005, 2004 and 2003. |
|
|
SCI has not changed its methodologies for determining the
reasonably possible range; however, there are changes made to
the assumptions as the loss development factors are updated.
These loss development factors are determined based on
SCIs historical loss development data(1) and are updated
annually as new data becomes available. As a result, the loss
development factors used in the December 31, 2004 analysis
could be different from the loss development factors used in the
December 31, 2005 analysis. SCI considers these changes in
loss development factors synonymous to changes in
assumptions. The final loss estimate is not determined by
weighting the methodologies, but instead is subjectively arrived
at by SCIs independent actuary considering the relative
merits of the various methods and the truncated average of the
various methods. |
|
|
For each loss type (workers compensation, general liability, and
auto liability) loss triangles are generated, which
show the cumulative valuation of each loss period over time. The
loss components |
98
|
|
|
evaluated include incurred losses, paid losses, reported claim
counts, and average incurred loss. The actuarial analysis of
losses uses this data to estimate future loss development or
settlement value of the losses. Since these loss development
factors are an estimate about future loss development, the
calculation of ultimate losses is also an estimate. The actual
ultimate loss value may not be known for many years, and may
differ significantly from the estimated value of the ultimate
losses. |
|
|
As of December 31, 2005, reported losses within SCIs
retention for workers compensation, general liability and auto
liability incurred during the period May 1, 1987 through
December 31, 2005 were approximately $203.0 million.
The selected fully developed ultimate settlement value estimated
by SCIs independent actuary was $238.6 million. Paid
losses were $189.6 million indicating a reserve requirement
of $49.0 million. After considering matters discussed with
SCIs independent actuary related to this calculation, SCI
estimated the reserve to be $49.0 million as of
December 31, 2005. |
At December 31, 2005 and 2004, the balances in the reserve
and the related activity were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
$ |
(46.8 |
) |
Additions
|
|
|
(38.3 |
) |
Payments
|
|
|
37.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
(47.3 |
) |
Additions
|
|
|
(20.1 |
) |
Payments
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
(49.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
SCIs independent actuary performed a sensitivity analysis
that was modeled to assess the impact of changes to the reserve
pertaining to workers compensation, general liability, and auto
liability. The sensitivity analysis assumes an instantaneous 10%
adverse change to the loss development factors as summarized
below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sensitivity Analysis | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Workers Compensation
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
General Liability
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
Auto Liability
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Sensitivity
|
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The loss development factors used in the December 31, 2005
calculation are based on SCIs actual claim history by
policy year for the period beginning May 1,
1991 May 1, 2005. |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Accounting Changes
Accounting Changes and Error
Corrections
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154,
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections A
Replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement
No. 3 (SFAS 154). SFAS 154 primarily
requires retrospective application to prior period financial
statements for the direct effects of changes in accounting
principles, unless it is impracticable to determine either the
period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change.
SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and
corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2005 (January 1, 2006 for us). The impact
of SFAS 154 will depend on the nature and extent of any
voluntary accounting changes or error corrections after the
effective date, but SCI does not expect SFAS 154 to have a
material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
99
Other-than-Temporary
Impairments
In June 2005, the FASB decided not to provide additional
guidance on the meaning of other-than-temporary impairment, and
directed the staff to issue proposed FSP
EITF 03-1-a,
Implementation Guidance for the Application of
Paragraph 16 of EITF Issue
No. 03-1, as
final. The final FSP supersedes EITF Issue
No. 03-1, The
Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application
to Certain Investments, and EITF Topic No. D-44,
Recognition of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment upon the
Planned Sale of a Security Whose Cost Exceeds Fair Value.
The final FSP (retitled FSP FAS 115-1, The Meaning of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain
Investments) replaces the guidance set forth in
paragraphs 10-18 of EITF
Issue 03-1 with
references to existing other-than-temporary impairment guidance.
FSP FAS 115-1 codifies the guidance set forth in EITF Topic
D-44 and clarifies that an investor should recognize an
impairment loss no later than when the impairment is deemed
other-than-temporary, even if a decision to sell has not been
made. FSP FAS 115-1 is effective for other-than-temporary
analysis conducted in periods beginning after December 15,
2005. SCI adopted the provisions of FSP FAS 115-1 as of
January 1, 2006 and as of the date of adoption, this
statement had no material impact on its consolidated financial
statements.
Deferred Selling
Costs
Effective January 1, 2005, SCI changed its method of
accounting for direct selling costs related to the acquisition
of preneed funeral and preneed cemetery contracts. Prior to this
change, SCI capitalized such direct selling costs and amortized
these deferred selling costs in proportion to the revenue
recognized. Under SCIs new method of accounting, SCI
expenses these direct selling costs as incurred. SCI believes
the new method is preferable because it better reflects the
economics of its business.
As of January 1, 2005, SCI recorded a cumulative effect
charge of $187.5 million, net of tax of
$117.4 million. This amount represents the cumulative
balance of deferred selling costs recorded on SCIs
consolidated balance sheet in Deferred charges and other
assets at the time of the accounting change. If we had not
changed its method of accounting for direct selling costs as
described above, net income for the year ended December 31,
2005 would have been approximately $10.5 million or
$.03 per basic and diluted share higher than currently
reported.
The pro forma amounts for the years ended December 31, 2004
and 2003 in the table below reflect SCIs new policy to
expense selling costs as incurred. The effect of the change for
the years ended December 31, 2004 and December 31,
2003 would have decreased net income from continuing operations
100
before cumulative effects of accounting changes by approximately
$9.4 million and $6.5 million or $.03 and
$.02 per diluted share, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred | |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling | |
|
|
|
|
|
Selling | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs | |
|
|
|
|
|
Costs | |
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
Net(1) | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Historical | |
|
Net(1) | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except per share data) | |
Gross profits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
$ |
227.8 |
|
|
$ |
(4.7 |
) |
|
$ |
223.1 |
|
|
$ |
273.7 |
|
|
$ |
(4.3 |
) |
|
$ |
269.4 |
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
102.2 |
|
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
92.6 |
|
|
|
82.5 |
|
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
76.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
330.0 |
|
|
$ |
(14.3 |
) |
|
$ |
315.7 |
|
|
$ |
356.2 |
|
|
$ |
(10.7 |
) |
|
$ |
345.5 |
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and
cumulative effects of accounting changes
|
|
$ |
112.0 |
|
|
$ |
(14.3 |
) |
|
$ |
97.7 |
|
|
$ |
95.7 |
|
|
$ |
(10.7 |
) |
|
$ |
85.0 |
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
110.7 |
|
|
$ |
(9.4 |
) |
|
$ |
101.3 |
|
|
$ |
85.1 |
|
|
$ |
(6.5 |
) |
|
$ |
78.6 |
|
Amounts per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) basic
|
|
$ |
.35 |
|
|
$ |
(.03 |
) |
|
$ |
.32 |
|
|
$ |
.28 |
|
|
$ |
(.02 |
) |
|
$ |
.26 |
|
|
Net income (loss) diluted
|
|
$ |
.34 |
|
|
$ |
(.03 |
) |
|
$ |
.31 |
|
|
$ |
.28 |
|
|
$ |
(.02 |
) |
|
$ |
.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents net deferred selling costs that would have been
expensed under the new method of accounting adopted on
January 1, 2005. |
Inventory Costs
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
Inventory Costs an amendment of ARB 43,
Chapter 4 (SFAS 151). SFAS 151 amends
the guidance in Accounting Research Bulletin
(ARB) No. 43, Chapter 4, Inventory
Pricing, to clarify the accounting for abnormal
amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and
wasted material. SFAS 151 requires that those items be
recognized as current-period charges, rather than as a portion
of the inventory cost. In addition, SFAS 151 requires that
allocation of fixed production overhead to the costs of
conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production
facilities. SFAS 151 is effective for inventory costs
incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005.
SCI adopted the provisions of SFAS 151 as of
January 1, 2006 and as of the date of adoption, this
statement had no material impact on its consolidated financial
position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Share-Based Payment
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment(SFAS 123R).
SFAS 123R is a revision of SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and
supersedes APB 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees. Among other items, SFAS 123R
eliminates the use of the intrinsic value method of accounting,
and requires companies to recognize in the statement of
operations the cost of employee services received in exchange
for awards of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair
value of those awards. SCI will continue to utilize the
Black-Scholes option pricing model to measure the fair value of
its stock options. SCI has adopted SFAS 123R on
January 1, 2006 and will use the modified-prospective
transition method. SCI has calculated our historical pool of
windfall tax benefits by comparing the book expense for
individual stock grants and the related tax deduction for
options granted after January 1, 1995. Additionally,
adjustments were made to exclude windfall tax benefits which
were not realized due to SCIs net operating loss position.
SCI has completed this calculation and has determined an
additional paid in capital pool of approximately
$2.1 million. The
101
adoption of SFAS 123R is expected to negatively impact
SCIs after-tax earnings by approximately $2.6 million
or $.01 per diluted share for the year ending
December 31, 2006.
Under the modified-prospective method, SCI will recognize
compensation expense in its consolidated financial statements
issued subsequent to the date of adoption for all share-based
payments granted, modified or settled after December 31,
2005, as well as for any awards that were granted prior to
December 31, 2005 for which requisite service will be
provided after December 31, 2005. The compensation expense
on awards granted prior to December 31, 2005 will be
recognized using the fair values determined for the pro forma
disclosures on stock-based compensation included in prior
filings. The amount of compensation expense that will be
recognized on awards that have not fully vested will exclude the
compensation expense cumulatively recognized in the pro forma
disclosures on stock-based compensation.
Variable Interest
Entities
In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46. This
interpretation clarifies the application of
ARB No. 51, Consolidated Financial
Statements, to certain entities in which equity investors
do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial
interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity
to finance its activities without additional subordinated
financial support from other parties. In December 2003, the FASB
revised FIN 46.
Under the provisions of FIN 46R, we are required to
consolidate certain cemeteries and trust assets. Merchandise and
service trusts and cemetery perpetual care trusts are considered
variable interest entities because the trusts meet the
conditions of paragraphs 5(a) and 5(b)(1) of FIN 46R.
That is, as a group, the equity investors (if any) do not have
sufficient equity at risk and do not have the direct or indirect
ability through voting or similar rights to make decisions about
the trusts activities that have a significant effect on
the success of the trusts. FIN 46R requires us to
consolidate merchandise and service trusts and cemetery
perpetual care trusts for which we are the primary beneficiary
(i.e., those for which we absorb a majority of the trusts
expected losses). SCI is the primary beneficiary of a trust
whenever a majority of the assets of the trust are attributable
to deposits of our customers.
SCI implemented FIN 46R as of March 31, 2004. Prior to
the implementation, we operated certain cemeteries in Michigan
which it managed but did not own. During its evaluation of
FIN 46R, SCI evaluated these cemeteries to determine
whether such cemeteries were within the scope of FIN 46R.
The investment capital of these cemeteries was financed by SCI
in exchange for a long-term sales, accounting, and cash
management agreement. In accordance with this agreement, SCI
receives the majority of the cash flows from these cemeteries.
Additionally, SCI absorbs the majority of these cemeteries
expected losses and receive a majority of the cemeteries
residual returns. As a result, SCI concluded that we were
the primary beneficiary of these cemeteries and that the
long-term sales, accounting, and cash management agreement is a
variable interest as defined by FIN 46R. Given the
circumstances above, SCI consolidated such cemeteries as of
March 31, 2004. SCI recognized an after tax charge of
$14.0 million, representing the cumulative effect of an
accounting change, as a result of consolidating these
cemeteries. The results of operations and cash flows of these
cemeteries are included in SCIs consolidated statements of
operations and cash flows beginning March 31, 2004.
Excluding the cumulative effect of accounting change, the effect
of consolidating these entities did not have a significant
impact on SCIs reported results of operations.
Pension Plans
Effective January 1, 2004, SCI changed our accounting for
gains and losses on our pension plan assets and obligations. SCI
now recognizes pension gains and losses in its consolidated
statement of operations as such gains and losses are incurred
under pension accounting. Prior to January 1, 2004, SCI
amortized the difference between actual and expected investment
returns and actuarial gains and losses over seven years (except
to the extent that settlements with employees required earlier
recognition). SCI believes the new method of accounting better
reflects the economic nature of its pension plans and recognize
gains and
102
losses on the pension plan assets and obligations in the year
the gains or losses occur. As a result of this accounting
change, SCI recognized a cumulative effect charge of an
accounting change of $36.6 million (net of tax) as of
January 1, 2004. This amount represented accumulated
unrecognized net losses related to SCIs pension plan
assets and liabilities. Under its new accounting policy, SCI
records net pension expense or income reflecting estimated
returns on plan assets and obligations for its interim financial
statements, and SCI recognizes actual gains and losses on plan
assets and obligations for its full-year (annual) financial
statements as actuarial information becomes available upon
review of the annual remeasurement.
|
|
|
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes |
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN 48), which clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty of income tax positions recognized in accordance
with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive model
for how a company should recognize, measure, present, and
disclose in its financial statements uncertain tax positions
that the company has taken or expects to take. It presumes the
taxing authorities full knowledge of the position,
including all relevant facts. The provisions of FIN 48 are
effective beginning January 1, 2007 for SCI, with any
potential cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
recorded as an adjustment to beginning retained earnings. SCI is
currently evaluating the impact of adopting FIN 48 on its
consolidated financial statements.
Alderwoods
Alderwoods consolidated financial statements are prepared
in accordance with United States GAAP, which require management
to make estimates and assumptions (see note 2 to
Alderwoods Consolidated Financial Statements for the
52 weeks ended December 31, 2005) that impact all of
its business segments. Management believes that, of the
significant accounting policies described in Note 2 to
Alderwoods Consolidated Financial Statements, the
following are the most important to the representation of the
Companys financial position, results of operations and
cash flows. These require managements most difficult,
subjective and complex judgment efforts. All of these critical
accounting policies have been discussed and reviewed with
Alderwoods Audit Committee. While Alderwoods believes that
its assumptions and estimates are reasonable and appropriate,
different assumptions and estimates could materially impact
Alderwoods reported financial results.
Collectability of Customer
Receivables
Management must make estimates of the allowance for
uncollectible amounts of customer receivables arising from
at-need funeral services. Alderwoods estimates this allowance
based primarily on historical experience of collections and
write-offs, as well as other analytical procedures, such as
assessment of the change in the aging of receivables. Alderwoods
has historically estimated the allowance for uncollectible
amounts at 0.75% to 1.2% of funeral revenue on a period basis
with quarterly analysis and assessment to reduce or increase
allowance for doubtful accounts to approximate the accounts
receivable outstanding for more than 180 days.
Management must make estimates of the allowance for contract
cancellations and refunds of customer receivables arising from
pre-need funeral contracts. However, any change to the estimated
rate or balance would be offset by a corresponding adjustment in
the allowance for contract cancellations and refunds against
deferred pre-need funeral revenue. There would be no impact on
net income or cash flows. Accordingly, such allowance for
contract cancellations and refunds is not considered a critical
accounting policy.
Management must make estimates of the allowance for contract
cancellations and refunds arising from pre-need cemetery
contracts. Pre-need cemetery contracts may contain both pre-need
cemetery interment rights and pre-need cemetery merchandise and
services. As pre-need cemetery interment rights
103
are recognized in income when sold, an estimate of the related
uncollectible amounts is charged to income. The estimate of the
allowance for contract cancellations and refunds related to the
pre-need cemetery merchandise and service portion of the
contracts is offset with a corresponding adjustment in the
allowance for contract cancellations and refunds against
deferred pre-need cemetery revenue.
Estimates of the allowance for contract cancellations and
refunds arising from pre-need cemetery contracts are based
primarily on historical experience of collections and
write-offs, as well as other analytical procedures, such as
assessment of the change in the aging of receivables. Alderwoods
has estimated the allowance for contract cancellations and
refunds of current sales of pre-need cemetery contracts at 5% to
10% of pre-need cemetery sales. Alderwoodss experience has
not indicated any change to this rate is necessary.
Alderwoods customer receivables arising from pre-need
cemetery contracts includes receivables with balances
outstanding entered into by Loewen Group. During Loewen
Groups reorganization proceedings, it began to change the
pre-need cemetery contract terms to include larger mandatory
down payments and shorter contract maturities. Alderwoods
estimated the allowance for contract cancellations and refunds
using the best information available at December 31, 2001.
During 2002 and 2003, Alderwoods focused collection efforts
resulted in higher collections than anticipated on the
pre-emergence receivables. As a result of the improvement in
actual collections, Alderwoods reversed $3.9 million of the
allowance for contract cancellations and refunds on receivables
arising from pre-need cemetery interment rights during the
53 weeks ended January 3, 2004. As of
December 31, 2005, Alderwoods had approximately
$7.2 million (2004 $11.8 million) of
pre-emergence customer receivables remaining, of which an
allowance for contract cancellations and refunds of
$5.6 million (2004 $7.5 million) had been
established. Due to the significant number of estimates and
projections utilized in determining an expected rate of
uncollectible receivables, actual results of collections could
be materially different from these estimates.
Changes in customer circumstances outside of Alderwoods
control may also impact the collectibility of customer
receivables.
Valuation of Long-Lived
Assets
During 2002, 2003, and 2004, Alderwoods engaged in a strategic
market rationalization assessment to dispose of funeral and
cemetery operating locations that did not fit into
Alderwoods market or business strategies, as well as
under-performing locations and excess cemetery land. Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets (FAS No. 144) requires
that long-lived assets to be disposed of are to be recorded at
the lower of carrying amount or fair market value, less
estimated costs to sell. Alderwoods determines the fair market
value of its discontinued operations by specific offer or bid,
or an estimate based on comparable sales transactions. Such
offers or bids are outside of Alderwoodss control.
The estimated fair market values may change due to offers or
bids changing as a result of continued negotiations with buyers
or bids or offers being different than management estimates
based on previous comparable sales transactions. Such changes in
fair market values will be reflected by Alderwoods recording
corresponding impairment charges or reversals of previous
impairment charges.
In many cases, Alderwoods receives offers or bids for groups of
operating locations. The evaluation for possible impairment
aggregates the carrying amounts of the relevant operating
locations and compares this against the corresponding offer or
bid. It is possible that although the aggregate expected
proceeds may not change, the group of locations comprising the
various bids or offers may change such that a subsequent
impairment evaluation may consider the operating locations
grouped differently. As a result, Alderwoods may record
additional impairment on some of the changed groups while other
changed groups may result in deferred gains (estimated proceeds
are greater than the carrying amount).
As of December 31, 2005, Alderwoods had one cemetery and
two funeral locations for disposal with an aggregate carrying
amount of $341,000, which approximates the estimated net
proceeds after selling
104
costs. Changes to the carrying amounts or estimated net proceeds
may result in impairment charges or reversals or gains or losses
upon final sale.
The identification of cemetery and funeral operating locations
that do not fit into the Alderwoodss market or business
strategies, as well as under-performing locations and excess
cemetery land, is complete.
Goodwill of the funeral reporting unit is not amortized. It is
tested annually, as well as on the occurrence of certain
significant events, as prescribed by relevant accounting
requirements, to determine whether or not the carrying value has
been impaired. Such testing entails determining an estimated
fair value of goodwill (implied goodwill) for
comparison to the carrying amount of goodwill, to assess whether
or not impairment has occurred. Impairment occurs when the
estimated fair value of goodwill associated with the funeral
reporting unit is less than the respective carrying amount of
such goodwill, resulting in a write down of the carrying value
to the estimated fair value of goodwill. Determination of the
estimated fair value of goodwill entails determining the
estimated fair value of the funeral reporting unit in total, and
allocating such value to the estimated fair value of the assets
and liabilities of the funeral reporting unit, in a method
similar to purchase accounting. The determination of the
estimated fair value of the funeral reporting unit involves many
complex assumptions, including underlying cash flow projections,
estimated discount rates and residual values.
While Alderwoods believes that its assumptions and estimates
have been reasonable and appropriate, different assumptions and
estimates could materially impact the Alderwoods reported
financial results. Alderwoods assessment as of
October 4, 2003, determined that the estimated fair value
of the funeral reporting unit exceeded its carrying value.
Alderwoods carried forward the 2003 goodwill valuation to 2004
and 2005, as there were no significant changes in the key
parameters used in the valuation exercise and no significant
change in Alderwoods continuing operations from 2003 to
2005.
The discount rate used for the analysis as of October 4,
2003, was determined based on assumptions regarding the current
interest rate environment and desired capital structure. If the
discount rate had been estimated at 0.5% higher, the estimated
fair value of the funeral reporting business unit would have
been approximately $50 million lower, and the fair value of
the funeral reporting unit would have been equal to its carrying
value. The estimated cash flows used for the analysis as of
October 4, 2003, were determined based on Alderwoods
projections. If the annual cash flows were reduced by 3% and the
discount rate was left unchanged, the estimated fair value of
the funeral reporting unit would have been approximately
$50 million lower and the fair value of the funeral
reporting unit would have been equal to its carrying value.
Alderwoods valuation of the funeral reporting unit was
prepared with the assistance of independent advisors.
Accounting for Income
Taxes
Alderwoods must estimate income taxes for its business segments
in each of the jurisdictions in which such business segments
operate. This involves estimating actual current tax expense,
assessing temporary differences resulting from different
treatment of various assets and liabilities for book and tax
purposes, such as depreciation and pre-need contracts, and
evaluating potential tax exposures based on current relevant
facts and circumstances.
The determination of temporary differences associated with
assets and liabilities results in deferred tax assets or
liabilities, which are recorded in the Alderwoodss
consolidated financial statements. Alderwoods then assesses the
likelihood that it will recover or realize its deferred tax
assets from expected future taxable income and, to the extent
that recovery is not considered to be more likely than
not, establishes a corresponding valuation allowance. In
general, to the extent that a valuation allowance increases or
decreases in a period, it will be included as an expense or
recovery within the tax provision for such period. If the
relevant valuation allowance was established upon emergence from
bankruptcy, any decrease as a result of the utilization of
benefits must reduce goodwill and, if insufficient goodwill
exists, be
105
credited to additional paid-in capital. The majority of
Alderwoods valuation allowances were established upon
emergence from bankruptcy.
Significant management judgment is required in determining our
provision for income taxes and in determining whether the
deferred tax assets will be realized in full or in part.
Alderwoods established a valuation allowance against
substantially all of its net federal deferred tax assets,
excluding those of its insurance operations, upon emergence from
bankruptcy as it did not have sufficient history of income to
support realization of the net deferred tax assets. The
valuation allowance was determined in accordance with the
provisions of SFAS No. 109 which requires an
assessment of both positive and negative evidence when
determining whether it is more likely than not that deferred tax
assets are recoverable. Such assessment is required on a
jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis. The valuation allowance is
subject to change due to matters such as timing and manner of
reversals of deferred tax liabilities, sales of operations and
future actual income or losses. For 2005, Alderwoods has
estimated future accounting income from its United States
operations for each of the next 3 years for purposes of
assessing the valuation allowance. As a result of this
assumption, Alderwoods has realized a benefit in tax expense of
$3.1 million and a reduction in goodwill of
$9.1 million.
To the extent that the effective tax rate increases or decreases
by 1% of income from continuing operations before income taxes,
consolidated income from continuing operations would have
declined or improved by less than $0.5 million in the
52 weeks ended December 31, 2005.
Liabilities for Future
Insurance Policy Benefits
Alderwoods calculates and maintains liabilities for future
insurance policy benefits for the estimated future payment of
claims to policyholders based on actuarial assumptions, such as
mortality (life expectancy), persistency, and interest rates.
The assumptions used are based on best estimates of future
experience at the time the policies are issued (or, if
applicable, on the date fresh start accounting was implemented)
with an adjustment for the risk of adverse deviation. Once
established, assumptions are generally not changed.
Alderwoods estimates of mortality and persistency are
based on historical experience. Alderwoods has estimated an
assumed weighted average investment yield of 4.5%. For the
52 weeks ended December 31, 2005, Alderwoods achieved
an investment yield of 5.25%. Because the liabilities are based
on extensive estimates, assumptions and historical experience,
it is possible that actual experience may differ materially from
that resulting from actuarial assumptions. However, the risk of
a material change in assumptions causing a material impact to
the Alderwoods financial position and results of operations is
mitigated by the type and small dollar nature of the policies.
The pre-need insurance products have discretionary growth that
accrues to the policy holder, and to the extent investment
returns are significantly below those assumed, Alderwoods has
the ability to reduce the future policy growth.
Annually, Alderwoods evaluates the collective adequacy of its
insurance policy liabilities by determining whether the
insurance premiums expected to be collected over the life of the
insurance contracts are sufficient to recover the current
unamortized balance in deferred acquisition costs, as well as to
provide for expected future benefits and expense, based on
current assumptions. If the recoverability tests indicate a
deficiency in the ability to pay all future benefits and
expenses, including the deferred acquisition costs, the loss is
recognized and charged to expense as an adjustment to the
current years deferred acquisition costs balance, or if
the loss is greater than the deferred acquisition costs balance,
by an increase in its liabilities for future policy benefits.
Alderwoods recoverability tests have indicated no deficiency in
its reserves during the past three years.
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements and Accounting Changes
Accounting for Certain
Hybrid Financial Instruments
In February 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid
Financial Instruments an
106
amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140
(SFAS 155). SFAS 155 amends
SFAS No. 133,Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133),
and SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers
and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of
Liabilities (SFAS 140). This Statement also
resolves issues addressed in Statement No. 133
Implementation Issue No. D1, Application of
Statement 133 to Beneficial Interests in Securitized
Financial Assets. SFAS 155 permits fair value
remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains
an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation
and clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only
strips are not subject to the requirements of SFAS 133.
SFAS 140 is amended to eliminate the prohibition on a
qualifying special-purpose entity from holding a derivative
financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest
other than another derivative financial instrument.
SFAS 155 is effective for all financial instruments
acquired or issued during fiscal years beginning after
September 15, 2006 (January 1, 2007 for us).
Alderwoods does not expect this statement to have a material
impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
SCI
The information presented below should be read in conjunction
with notes eleven and twelve to SCIs annual financial
statements included in this prospectus.
SCI has historically used derivatives primarily in the form of
interest rate swaps, cross-currency interest rate swaps, and
forward exchange contracts in combination with local currency
borrowings in order to manage its mix of fixed and floating rate
debt and to hedge its net investment in foreign assets. SCI does
not participate in derivative transactions that are leveraged or
considered speculative in nature. None of SCIs market risk
sensitive instruments are entered into for trading purposes. All
of the instruments described below are entered into for other
than trading purposes.
At June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, 95% and 99%,
respectively, of SCIs total debt consisted of fixed rate
debt at a weighted average rate of 7.23% and 7.11%,
respectively. At June 30, 2006, after giving pro forma
effect to the transactions, 79% of our total debt consisted of
fixed rate debt at a weighted average rate of 7.16%.
At June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, approximately
4% of SCIs stockholders equity and 9% and 8%,
respectively of its operating income were denominated in foreign
currencies, primarily the Canadian dollar. Approximately 2% of
SCIs stockholders equity and 23% of its operating
income were denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the
Canadian dollar, at December 31, 2004. SCI does not have a
significant investment in foreign operations that are in highly
inflationary economies. We do not have a significant investment
in foreign operations that are in highly inflationary economies.
Marketable Equity and Debt
Securities Price Risk
In connection with SCIs preneed funeral operations and
preneed cemetery merchandise and service sales, the related
funeral and cemetery trust funds own investments in equity
securities and mutual funds, which are sensitive to current
market prices. Cost and market values as of December 31,
2005 are presented in notes four, five and six to SCIs
annual financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
Market-Rate Sensitive
Instruments Interest Rate and Currency Risk
SCI performs a sensitivity analysis to assess the impact of
interest rate and exchange rate risks on earnings. This analysis
determines the effect of a hypothetical 10% adverse change in
market rates. In actuality, market rate volatility is dependent
on many factors that are impossible to forecast. Therefore, the
adverse changes described below could differ substantially from
the hypothetical 10% change.
107
SCI is currently not subject to significant interest rate risk
on its outstanding debt as 95% of such debt has fixed rate
interest terms. The fair market value of SCIs debt was
approximately $16.6 million less than its carrying value at
June 30, 2006.
A similar model was used to assess the impact of changes in
exchange rates for foreign currencies on SCIs consolidated
statement of operations. At December 31, 2005 and 2004,
SCIs foreign currency exposure was primarily associated
with the Canadian dollar, the Chilean peso and the euro. A 10%
adverse change in the strength of the U.S. dollar relative
to the foreign currency instruments would have negatively
affected SCIs net income (excluding discontinued
operations), on an annual basis, by less than $0.5 million
on December 31, 2005 and less than $1.5 million on
December 31, 2004. For the six months ended June 30,
2006 a 10% adverse change would have negatively impacted
SCIs net income less than $0.5 million.
Alderwoods
There have been no material changes in market risks for the
52 weeks ended December 31, 2005, compared to the
52 weeks ended January 1, 2005.
Alderwoods major market risk exposures are to changing interest
rates, currency exchange rates and to equity prices. The market
risk exposure discussion below provides information about
market-sensitive financial instruments and constitutes
forward-looking statements, which involve risks and
uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those
projected in the forward-looking statements.
Alderwoods exposure to interest rate fluctuations resides
primarily in the United States, and Alderwoods exposure to
currency exchange rate fluctuations resides primarily in
investments and operations in Canada, which is generally stable
politically and economically and is not highly inflationary.
Alderwoods has a significant portion of its corporate and
administrative functions in Canada. Expenses for these functions
are paid principally in Canadian dollars and have predictable
future cash outflows. Alderwoods has a program to hedge the
variability in the United States dollar equivalent of a portion
of the foreign currency expenditure due to the fluctuation in
the exchange rate between the United States dollar and Canadian
dollar. Alderwoods uses forward foreign exchange contracts and
foreign exchange option contracts to partially mitigate foreign
exchange variability. Under the Foreign Currency Hedge Program,
losses or gains in Alderwoods underlying foreign exchange
exposure are partially offset by gains or losses on the forward
foreign exchange contracts and foreign exchange option
contracts, so as to reduce the magnitude of foreign exchange
transaction gains or losses.
A 1% change in exchange rates would cause approximately
$0.5 million change in Alderwoods general and
administrative expenses and approximately $0.1 million
change in the aggregate fair value of Alderwoods forward
foreign exchange contracts and foreign exchange option
contracts. The table below presents the notional amounts,
weighted average foreign exchange rates, and fair values of the
outstanding forward foreign exchange contracts and foreign
exchange option contracts, as of December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars for Foreign |
|
Notional Weighted Average |
|
Asset Fair |
Forward Foreign Exchange Contracts |
|
Currency |
|
Exchange Rate |
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Foreign currency |
|
|
|
(Dollars in |
|
|
notional amount in |
|
|
|
thousands) |
|
|
thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Functional currency:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian dollar
|
|
$ |
16,000 |
|
|
US$ |
0.8254 |
|
|
US$ |
576 |
|
108
As of December 31, 2005, forward foreign exchange contracts
with fair values of $0.5 million and $0.01 million
mature during 2006 and 2007, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange United States |
|
Notional Weighted |
|
Notional Weighted |
|
|
|
|
Dollars for Foreign |
|
Average Exchange |
|
Average Exchange |
|
Asset Fair |
Foreign Exchange Option Contracts |
|
Currency |
|
Rate on Cdn. Calls |
|
Rate on Cdn. Puts |
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Foreign currency |
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in |
|
|
notional amount in |
|
|
|
|
|
thousands) |
|
|
thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Functional currency:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian dollar
|
|
$ |
13,000 |
|
|
US$ |
0.8446 |
|
|
US$ |
0.8105 |
|
|
US$ |
365 |
|
As of December 31, 2005, foreign exchange option contracts
with fair values of $0.4 million and $0.01 million
mature during 2006 and 2007, respectively.
Derivative financial instruments involve credit and market risk.
Credit risk arises from the potential for a counterparty to
default on its contractual obligations and is limited to those
contracts where Alderwoods would incur a loss in replacing the
defaulted transaction. Alderwoods minimizes this risk by
diversifying through counterparties that are of strong credit
quality. Alderwoods does not enter into derivative financial
instruments for trading purposes.
109
BUSINESS
General
We are North Americas leading provider of deathcare
products and services, with a network of funeral homes and
cemeteries unequalled in geographic scale and reach. We hold
leading positions in each of the U.S. and Canada and, in 2005,
giving pro forma effect to the transactions, we estimate that we
represented approximately 14% of the funeral and cemetery
services business in North America based on industry revenues,
which was approximately five times the share of our next largest
North American competitor. At June 30, 2006, on a pro forma
basis giving effect to the transactions, we owned and operated
1,438 funeral service locations and 235 cemeteries in North
America, which are geographically diversified across
46 states, eight Canadian provinces, the District of
Columbia and Puerto Rico. In addition, after giving pro forma
effect to the transactions, we own and operate an insurance
company that supports our funeral operations.
Our funeral service and cemetery operations consist of funeral
service locations, cemeteries, funeral service/cemetery
combination locations, crematoria and related businesses. We
provide all professional services relating to funerals and
cremations, including the use of funeral facilities and motor
vehicles and preparation and embalming services. Funeral related
merchandise, including caskets, burial vaults, cremation
receptacles, flowers and other ancillary products and services,
is sold at each of our funeral service locations. Our cemeteries
provide cemetery property interment rights, including mausoleum
spaces, lots and lawn crypts, and sell cemetery related
merchandise and services, including stone and bronze memorials,
burial vaults, casket and cremation memorialization products,
merchandise installations and burial openings and closings. We
also sell preneed funeral and cemetery products and services
whereby a customer contractually agrees to the terms of certain
products and services to be provided in the future. Finally,
Alderwoods insurance subsidiary sells a variety of
insurance products, primarily for the funding of preneed
funerals sold by Alderwoods funeral locations.
At June 30, 2006, on a pro forma basis giving effect to the
transactions, we owned 243 funeral service/cemetery combination
locations in which a funeral service location is physically
located within or adjoining a cemetery that we own. Combination
locations allow certain facility, personnel, and equipment costs
to be shared between the funeral service location and cemetery
and typically can be cost competitive and still have higher
gross margins than if the funeral and cemetery operations were
operated separately. Combination locations also create synergies
between funeral and cemetery sales force personnel and give
families added convenience to purchase both funeral and cemetery
products and services at a single location.
Our Competitive Strengths
Industry leader. We believe that our estimated 14% North
America share, on a pro forma basis giving effect to the
transactions, based on 2005 industry revenues, is approximately
five times that of our next largest North American competitor
and approximately two times that of the estimated 6% combined
share of the remaining five publicly traded deathcare companies.
We believe that our size provides us the benefits of
standardized training, industry best practices and efficiencies
of scale.
Geographic reach. After giving pro forma effect to the
transactions, our combined network of more than 1,900 funeral
and cemetery locations is diversified over 46 states, eight
Canadian provinces, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico,
and allows us to serve a broad population base. We believe our
scale differentiates us from our competition by allowing us to
implement a national brand strategy and to pursue strategic
affinity partnerships with national groups that can influence
their members choice of deathcare provider. For example,
our strategic affinity partnerships today include the Veterans
of Foreign Wars and Ladies Auxiliary, whose combined membership
exceeds two million. We believe that our extensive national
network enhances purchasing scale and provides us with an
advantage in selling preneed funeral and cemetery products and
services by allowing us to offer our customers the ability to
transfer their preneed contracts to any of the providers in our
network.
110
National brand. In 2000, we introduced the first
coast-to-coast funeral
service brand in North America, Dignity
Memorial®.
We believe that a national brand name is increasingly important
as North American consumers continue to become more
geographically mobile. We believe that consumers are less likely
now than they have been historically to live in the same
community as their parents and grandparents or to know a local
funeral director. By building favorable associations with the
Dignity
Memorial®
brand through funeral services, advertising and
community outreach programs we strive to create an
image of consistency, dependability and excellence that makes
consumers more likely to choose our providers. We expect the
acquisition of Alderwoods to provide additional opportunities
for us to expand the Dignity
Memorial®
brand. In addition, we are currently developing a second brand,
Funeraria del
Angeltm,
to serve North Americas growing Hispanic population. As of
June 30, 2006, Funeraria del
Angeltm
had 23 locations in California, Texas, Illinois and Kansas.
Innovative offerings. Using our Dignity
Memorial®
brand, we augment our range of traditional products and services
with more contemporary and comprehensive offerings. In addition
to a wide range of funeral, memorial, burial and cremation
options, we offer assistance with many of the legal and
administrative details that burden customers at times of loss.
We also offer grief counseling for survivors and a bereavement
travel program, which obtains special rates on airfare, car
rentals and hotel accommodations for family and friends
traveling from out of town to attend services, and an internet
memorialization. In addition, we offer packaged plans for
funerals and cremations that are designed to simplify customer
decision-making. Since our packaged plans were introduced in
2004, they have achieved consistently high customer satisfaction
ratings.
Reputation and service excellence. We believe that we
have established a strong reputation for consistency and service
excellence, which sets us apart from many of our competitors,
serves as a key advantage to attracting customers and enhances
our standing as an employer of choice within the industry.
Continuing our commitment to excellence, in 2004 we established
Dignity
Universitytm,
a virtual school for SCI employees at all levels. It offers a
comprehensive curriculum of professional development and ethics
training that is designed to help employees upgrade skills,
advance their careers and implement ethical standards at every
level of performance. We believe that the acquisition of
Alderwoods will allow us to expand and build our reputation for
service excellence.
Our Strategies for Growth
In recent years, we have strengthened our balance sheet, lowered
our cost structure, introduced more efficient systems and
processes and strengthened our management team. We believe these
improvements, together with our acquisition of Alderwoods,
present us with significant opportunities to achieve future
growth. Our principal strategies are as follows:
Approach the business by customer preference. We believe
customer attitudes and preferences are essential to our
business. We are replacing the industrys traditional
one-size-fits-all approach with a flexible operating and
marketing strategy that categorizes customers according to
personal needs and preferences. Using this new approach, we will
tailor our product and service offerings based on four variables:
|
|
|
|
|
convenience and location, |
|
|
|
religious and ethnic customs, |
|
|
|
quality and prestige, and |
|
|
|
price. |
By identifying customers based on these variables, we can focus
our resources on the most profitable customer categories and
improve our marketing effectiveness. We will continue to refine
our pricing, product and marketing strategies to support this
approach.
Consistent with this strategy, we have begun to analyze existing
business relationships to determine whether they are consistent
with our strategic goals. As a result, SCI made certain local
business decisions
111
to exit unprofitable business relationships and activities in
late 2005 and early 2006, which resulted in an initial decrease
in total funeral services performed. However, SCI has also
experienced significant improvements in both average revenue per
funeral service and gross margins. We expect these improvements
to continue in the future as we redeploy resources to more
profitable areas. We continue to analyze our operations and may
exit certain business relationships or activities that do not
fit our customer segmentation strategy.
Realign pricing to reflect current market environment.
SCI, Alderwoods and other competitors in the deathcare industry
have historically generated most of their profits from the sale
of traditional products (including caskets, vaults and markers),
while placing less emphasis on the services involved in funeral
and burial preparation. However, because of increased customer
preference for comprehensive and personalized deathcare
services, as well as increased competition from retail outlets
and websites for the sale of traditional products, SCI has
realigned its pricing strategy from product to service offerings
in order to focus on services that are most valued by customers.
SCIs initial results from the realignment strategy have
been favorable based on increases in the overall average revenue
per funeral service performed. Upon completion of the
acquisition, we expect to evaluate Alderwoods pricing,
and, if necessary, make any adjustments to align the pricing
strategy at the Alderwoods locations to the current SCI
locations.
Drive operating discipline and take advantage of our
scale. Although we have already made substantial
improvements in our infrastructure, we believe we can continue
to achieve operating improvements through centralization and
standardization of processes for staffing, central care, fleet
management and cemetery maintenance. The acquisition of
Alderwoods provides further opportunities for synergies and
operating efficiencies, which will allow us to utilize our scale
and increase profitability. We are developing clear, yet
flexible, operating standards that will be used as benchmarks
for productivity in these areas. In conjunction with these
standards, we will develop and track shared best practices to
support higher productivity. We also intend to continue to
capitalize on our nationwide network of properties by pursuing
strategic affinity partnerships. Over the longer term, we
believe these relationships can be a key influence in the
funeral home selection process.
Manage and grow the footprint. We will manage our network
of business locations by positioning each business location to
support the preferences of its local customer base while
monitoring each region for changing demographics and competitive
dynamics. We will primarily target customers who value quality
and prestige or adhere to specific religious or ethnic customs.
In addition, we expect to pursue selective business expansion
through construction or targeted acquisitions of cemeteries and
funeral homes with a focus on the highest-return customer
categories. In particular, we will focus cemetery expansion
efforts on large cemeteries that are or may be combined with
funeral home operations, which allow facility, personnel, and
equipment costs to be shared between the funeral services
location and cemetery.
History
SCI
SCI was incorporated in Texas in July of 1962. Prior to 1999,
SCI focused on the acquisition and consolidation of independent
funeral homes and cemeteries in the fragmented deathcare
industry in North America. During the 1990s, SCI also
expanded its operations through acquisitions in Europe,
Australia, South America and the Pacific Rim. During the mid to
late 1990s, acquisitions of deathcare facilities became
extremely competitive resulting in increased prices for
acquisitions and substantially reduced returns on invested
capital. In 1999, SCI significantly reduced the level of
acquisition activity and focused on identifying and addressing
non-strategic or underperforming businesses. This focus resulted
in the divestiture of several North America and international
operations. During 2001 and 2002, SCI completed joint ventures
of operations in Australia, the United Kingdom, Spain and
Portugal. In 2003, SCI sold its equity investment in its
operations in Australia, Spain and Portugal. During 2004, SCI
sold its funeral operations in France and obtained a 25%
minority interest in the acquiring entity. SCI also sold its
minority interest equity investment in the United Kingdom.
During 2005, SCI divested of all of its operations in Argentina,
Uruguay, and Chile.
112
Alderwoods
From the inception of Loewen Group, Inc. in 1985 until 1998,
Loewen Groups business philosophy centered on a growth
strategy in the funeral home and cemetery businesses. Beginning
in 1998, in light of negative cash flows from its businesses and
increasing difficulties in meeting its debt service obligations,
Loewen Group virtually ceased its acquisition program and began
attempting to sell various operations. On June 1, 1999,
Loewen Group and certain of its subsidiaries voluntarily filed a
petition for creditor protection under Chapter 11 of the
United States Bankruptcy Code. Loewen Group and certain of its
Canadian subsidiaries also filed concurrently for creditor
protection under the Companies Creditors Arrangement Act.
Under the Fourth Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization of Loewen
Group, (also recognized by the Canadian court,) Alderwoods
succeeded to the business previously conducted by Loewen Group
on January 2, 2002 and emerged from bankruptcy. Since 2002,
Alderwoods has significantly reduced its outstanding debt,
streamlined its operations by divesting businesses that did not
fit into its business strategies, and finalized the resolution
of all outstanding bankruptcy claims and other related
reorganization issues.
Operations
Following the acquisition of Alderwoods, we expect that our
funeral and cemetery operations will be organized into a North
America division covering the United States and Canada and an
Other Foreign division including operations in Germany and
Singapore. We currently intend to sell our operations in Germany
and Singapore when economic values and conditions are conducive
to a sale.
Following the acquisition of Alderwoods, our operations in the
North America division are expected to be organized into
approximately 31 major regions and 42 middle regions (including
four Hispana regions). Each region will be led by a regional
director with responsibility for funeral and/or cemetery
operations and preneed sales. Within each region, the funeral
homes and cemeteries share common resources such as personnel,
preparation services and vehicles. There are four regional
support centers in North America to assist regional directors
with financial, administrative and human resource needs. These
support centers are located in Houston, Miami, New York, and Los
Angeles. The primary functions of the regional support centers
are to help facilitate the execution of corporate strategies,
coordinate communication between the field and corporate
offices, and serve as liaisons for the implementation of
policies and procedures.
The deathcare industry in North America is highly fragmented. To
be successful, we believe our funeral service locations and
cemeteries must maintain good reputations and high professional
standards in the industry, as well as offer attractive products
and services at competitive prices. We believe we have an
unparalleled network of funeral service locations and cemeteries
that offer high quality products and services at prices that are
competitive with local competing funeral homes, cemeteries and
retail locations.
We have multiple funeral service locations and cemeteries in a
number of metropolitan areas. Within individual metropolitan
areas, the funeral service locations and cemeteries operate
under various names as most operations were acquired as existing
businesses. Our wholly owned subsidiary, Kenyon International
Emergency Services, provides disaster management services in
mass fatality incidents. Some of our international funeral
service locations operate under certain brand names specific for
a general area or country. We have branded our funeral
operations in North America under the name Dignity
Memorial®.
We believe that our national branding strategy gives us a
competitive advantage in the industry. While this branding
process is intended to emphasize our seamless national network
of funeral service locations and cemeteries, the original names
associated with acquired operations, and their inherent goodwill
and heritage, generally remain the same. For example, Geo. H.
Lewis & Sons Funeral Directors is now Geo. H.
Lewis & Sons Funeral Directors, a Dignity
Memorial®
provider.
In the deathcare industry, there has been a growing trend in the
number of cremations performed in North America as an
alternative to traditional funeral service dispositions.
Cremation services usually result in lower revenue and gross
profit dollars than traditional funeral services. In North
America during 2005, after giving pro forma effect to the
transactions, approximately 39% of all funeral services we
performed were cremation services, compared to approximately 38%
performed in 2004. We have
113
expanded our cremation memorialization products and services
which has resulted in higher average sales for cremation
services compared to historical levels.
We do not manufacture the merchandise and other products sold to
our customers, but acquire them from third party manufacturers.
Our financial stability is enhanced by our approximately
$6.8 billion backlog of future revenues, as of
June 30, 2006 on a pro forma basis giving effect to the
transactions, which is a result of our preneed funeral and
cemetery sales in North America. These unfulfilled preneed
contracts are primarily supported by investments in trust funds,
which are included in our consolidated balance sheet, and
third-party insurance policies, which are not included in our
balance sheet. Preneed sales contribute to profitability and
volume, and increase the predictability and stability of our
revenues and cash flow.
Properties
At June 30, 2006, on a pro forma basis giving effect to the
transactions, we owned and operated 1,438 funeral service
locations and 235 cemeteries in North America, which are
geographically diversified across 46 states, eight Canadian
provinces, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico.
SCI
At June 30, 2006, SCI owned approximately 88% of the real
estate and buildings used at its facilities, and the remainder
of these facilities were leased. SCI owns its corporate
headquarters in Houston, Texas, which consists of approximately
127,000 square feet of office space and 185,000 square
feet of parking space. SCI owns and utilizes two additional
buildings located in Houston, Texas for corporate activities
containing a total of approximately 207,000 square feet of
office space.
At June 30, 2006, SCIs 351 cemeteries (including
combination locations) contained a total of approximately
25,407 acres, of which approximately 59% was developed.
The following table provides the number of SCI funeral homes and
cemeteries by state and country as of June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
Number of | |
|
Combination | |
|
|
Country, State/Province |
|
Funeral Homes | |
|
Cemeteries | |
|
Locations | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Alaska
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Arizona
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Arkansas
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
California
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
Colorado
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Connecticut
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
District of Columbia
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Florida
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
Georgia
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Hawaii
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Illinois
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Indiana
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Iowa
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Kansas
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Kentucky
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
Number of | |
|
Combination | |
|
|
Country, State/Province |
|
Funeral Homes | |
|
Cemeteries | |
|
Locations | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Louisiana
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Maine
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Maryland
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Massachusetts
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
Michigan
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
Mississippi
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Missouri
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Nebraska
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
New Hampshire
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
New York
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
North Carolina
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Ohio
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Oregon
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Rhode Island
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
South Carolina
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
South Dakota
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Tennessee
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Texas
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
Utah
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Virginia
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Washington
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
West Virginia
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Wisconsin
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alberta
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
British Columbia
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
New Brunswick
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
Nova Scotia
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
Ontario
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
Quebec
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
Saskatchewan
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Germany
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
Singapore
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
182 |
(1) |
|
|
1,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Certain combination locations consist of multiple cemeteries
combined with one funeral home. |
Alderwoods
Of Alderwoods 579 funeral homes as of June 17,
2006, 60 were leased facilities and the balance were owned
by Alderwoods. In some cases, Alderwoods has a right of first
refusal and/or an option to purchase
115
its leased premises. Alderwoods has 18 funeral homes pledged
through mortgages as security for other debt. As of
June 17, 2006, there were 484 funeral homes located in
the United States and 95 in Canada.
As of June 17, 2006, Alderwoods operated 61 combination
funeral homes and cemeteries, of which 58 were located in
the United States and three in Canada. Of these properties, one
funeral home was leased, and the balance were owned by
Alderwoods.
As of June 17, 2006, Alderwoods operated or provided
management and sales services pursuant to various management and
sales agreements to 71 cemeteries located in the United States
and one in Canada. The cemeteries (including those in
combination funeral homes and cemeteries) operated by Alderwoods
as of June 17, 2006, contained an aggregate of
approximately 8,500 acres, of which approximately 62% were
developed.
Alderwoods office in Cincinnati, Ohio occupies
approximately 21,000 square feet of leased office space.
Alderwoodss office in Toronto, Ontario occupies
approximately 29,000 square feet of owned office space.
Alderwoods office in Burnaby, British Columbia occupies
approximately 71,000 square feet of leased office space. As
part of our integration of Alderwoods, we intend to exit these
facilities when conditions are appropriate.
Alderwoods number of continuing operating locations by
country, state and province as of June 17, 2006 are
provided in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Operating Locations | |
|
Total Number of | |
|
|
| |
|
Operating | |
Country, State/ Province |
|
Funeral | |
|
Cemetery | |
|
Combination | |
|
Locations | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
British Columbia
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
Alberta
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
Saskatchewan
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
Manitoba
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Ontario
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
Quebec
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
Nova Scotia
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Canada
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
Alaska
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Arizona
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Arkansas
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
California
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
Colorado
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
Connecticut
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Georgia
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
Idaho
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Illinois
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
Indiana
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
Kansas
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
Maryland
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Massachusetts
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Operating Locations | |
|
Total Number of | |
|
|
| |
|
Operating | |
Country, State/ Province |
|
Funeral | |
|
Cemetery | |
|
Combination | |
|
Locations | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Minnesota
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
Mississippi
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
Montana
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Nevada
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
New Hampshire
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
New Mexico
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
New York
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
North Carolina
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
Ohio
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
Oregon
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
Rhode Island
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
South Carolina
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
Virginia
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
Washington
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
West Virginia
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Puerto Rico
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total United States
|
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall total as of June 17, 2006
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Competition
The deathcare industry is characterized by a large number of
locally-owned, independent operations. There are approximately
22,000 funeral homes and 10,500 cemeteries in the United States.
The share of a single funeral home or cemetery in any community
is a function of the name, reputation and location of that
funeral home or cemetery although competitive pricing,
professional service and attention, and well-maintained
locations are also important. We believe customer families tend
to choose a funeral home because it previously served their
family and because of the funeral homes reputation, which
must be developed over time. After the acquisition, the two
largest public operators in the death care industry in the
United States, based on total revenue and number of locations,
will be us and Stewart Enterprises, Inc. After giving pro forma
effect to the transactions, we believe that we and Stewart
collectively represented approximately 17% of funeral service
revenues in the United States in 2005.
Regulation
Our operations are subject to regulations, supervision and
licensing under numerous foreign, federal, state and local laws,
ordinances and regulations, including extensive regulations
concerning trust funds, preneed sales of funeral and cemetery
products and services and various other aspects of our business.
We strive to comply in all material respects with the provisions
of these laws, ordinances and regulations. Since 1984, we have
operated in the United States under the FTC comprehensive trade
regulation rule for the funeral industry. The rule contains
requirements for funeral industry practices, including extensive
price and other affirmative disclosures and imposes mandatory
itemization of funeral goods and services.
117
Employees
At December 31, 2005, on a combined historical basis, we
employed approximately 25,000 (approximately 23,700 in North
America) individuals on either a full time or part time basis.
Approximately 630 of our employees in North America are
represented by unions. Although labor disputes are experienced
from time to time, relations with employees are generally
considered favorable.
Legal Proceedings
SCI
SCI is a party to various litigation matters, investigations and
proceedings. For each of its outstanding legal matters, SCI
evaluates the merits of the case, its exposure to the matter,
possible legal or settlement strategies and the likelihood of an
unfavorable outcome. If SCI determines that an unfavorable
outcome is probable and can be reasonably estimated, it
establishes the necessary accruals. Certain insurance policies
held by SCI may reduce cash outflows with respect to an adverse
outcome of certain of these litigation matters. SCI accrues such
insurance recoveries when they become probable of being paid and
can be reasonably estimated.
Conley Investment Counsel v. Service Corporation
International, et al; Civil Action
04-MD-1609; In the
United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas,
Houston Division (the 2003 Securities Lawsuit). The
2003 Securities Lawsuit resulted from the transfer and
consolidation by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
of three lawsuits Edgar Neufeld v. Service
Corporation International, et al; Cause
No. CV-S-03-1561-HDM-PAL;
in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada;
Rujira Srisythemp v. Service Corporation International,
et. al.; Cause
No. CV-S-03-1392-LDG-LRL;
In the United States District Court for the District of Nevada;
and Joshua Ackerman v. Service Corporation
International, et al; Cause
No. 04-CV-20114;
In the United States District Court for the Southern District of
Florida. The 2003 Securities Lawsuit names as defendants SCI and
several of SCIs current and former executive officers or
directors. The 2003 Securities Lawsuit is a purported class
action alleging that the defendants failed to disclose the
unlawful treatment of human remains and gravesites at two
cemeteries in Fort Lauderdale and West Palm Beach, Florida.
Since the action is in its preliminary stages, no discovery has
occurred, and SCI cannot quantify its ultimate liability, if
any, for the payment of damages.
Maria Valls, Pedro Valls and Roberto Valls, on behalf of
themselves and all other similarly situated v. SCI Funeral
Services of Florida, Inc. d/b/a Memorial Plan a/k/a Flagler
Memorial Park, John Does and Jane Does; Case
No. 23693CA08; In the Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial
Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida (Consumer
Lawsuit). The Consumer Lawsuit was filed December 5,
2005, and named a subsidiary of SCI as a defendant. An amended
complaint was filed on May 31, 2006. Plaintiffs have
requested that the Court certify this matter as a class action.
The plaintiffs allege the defendants improperly handled remains,
did not keep adequate records of interments, and engaged in
various other improprieties in connection with the operation of
the cemetery. The plaintiffs seek to certify as a class all
family members of persons buried at the cemetery. The plaintiffs
are seeking monetary damages and have reserved the right to seek
leave from the Court to claim punitive damages. The plaintiffs
are also seeking injunctive relief. Since the action is in its
preliminary stages, SCI cannot quantify its ultimate liability,
if any, for the payment of any damages. The defendant has also
been contacted by representatives of other families who may
pursue burial practices claims related to this and other
cemeteries.
David Hijar v. SCI Texas Funeral Services, Inc., SCI
Funeral Services, Inc., and Service Corporation
International; In the County Court of El Paso, County,
Texas, County Court at Law Number Three; Cause Number
2002-740, with an
interlocutory appeal pending in the El Paso Court of
Appeals, No.
08-05-00182-CV, and a
mandamus proceeding pending in the El Paso Court of
Appeals,
No. 08-05-00335-CV
(collectively, the Hijar Lawsuit). The Hijar Lawsuit
involves a state-wide class action brought on behalf of all
persons, entities and organizations who purchased funeral
services from SCI or its subsidiaries in Texas at any time since
March 18, 1998. Plaintiffs allege that federal and Texas
funeral related regulations and/or statutes (Rules)
required SCI to disclose its markups on all items
118
obtained from third parties in connection with funeral service
contracts and that the failure to make certain disclosures of
markups resulted in breach of contract and other legal claims.
The plaintiffs seek to recover an unspecified amount of monetary
damages. The plaintiffs also seek attorneys fees, costs of
court, pre- and post-judgment interest, and unspecified
injunctive and declaratory relief. SCI denies that
the plaintiffs have standing to sue for violations of the Texas
Occupations Code or the Rules, denies that plaintiffs have
standing to sue for violations under the relevant regulations
and statutes, denies that any breaches of contractual terms
occurred, and on other grounds denies liability on all of the
plaintiffs claims. Finally, SCI denies that the Hijar
Lawsuit satisfies the requirements for class certification.
In May 2004, the trial court heard summary judgment
cross-motions filed by SCI and Plaintiff Hijar (at that time,
the only plaintiff). The trial court granted Hijars motion
for partial summary judgment and denied SCIs motion. In
its partial summary judgment order, the trial court made certain
findings to govern the case, consistent with its summary
judgment ruling. SCIs request for rehearing was denied.
During the course of the Hijar Lawsuit, the parties have
disputed the proper scope and substance of discovery. Following
briefing by both parties and evidentiary hearings, the trial
court entered three orders against SCI that are the subject of
appellate review: (a) a January 2005 discovery sanctions
order; (b) an April 2005 discovery sanctions order; and
(c) an April 2005 certification order, certifying a class
and two subclasses. On April 29, 2005, SCI filed an appeal
regarding the certification order and, concurrently with its
initial brief in that appeal, filed a separate mandamus
proceeding regarding the sanctions orders. In the certification
appeal the court of appeals heard oral arguments on
April 4, 2006. On July 27, 2006, the court of appeals
issued an opinion holding that the plaintiffs do not have a
private right of action for monetary damages under the relevant
regulations and statutes. The opinion concludes that the
plaintiffs do not have standing to assert their claims for
monetary damages on behalf of themselves or the class. The court
of appeals therefore reversed the trial courts order
certifying a class, rendered judgment against the plaintiffs on
their claims for damages, and remanded the remaining general
individual claims for injunctive relief back to the trial court
(without opining on the merits of those claims) for further
handling consistent with the courts opinion. In the
mandamus proceeding, the court of appeals denied the mandamus
petition in January 2006, and denied rehearing on March 15,
2006. SCI filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the Supreme
Court of Texas, which on September 11, 2006 requested full
briefing on the merits. SCIs brief on the merits is
currently due on November 10, 2006.
Mary Louise Baudino, et al v. Service Corporation
International, et al; the plaintiffs counsel in
the Hijar Lawsuit initiated an arbitration claim raising similar
issues in California and filed in November 2004 a case styled
Mary Louise Baudino, et al v. Service Corporation
International, et al; in Los Angeles County Superior
Court; Case No. BC324007 (Baudino Lawsuit). The
Baudino Lawsuit makes claims similar to those made in the Hijar
lawsuit. However, the Baudino Lawsuit seeks a nation-wide class
of plaintiffs. The Baudino Lawsuit is in its early stages and
discovery is in its infancy. On September 15, 2006, the
trial court granted SCIs motion for summary judgment on
the merits of plaintiffs claims.
SCI is a defendant in two related class action antitrust cases
filed in 2005. The first case is Cause No 4:05-CV-03394;
Funeral Consumers Alliance, Inc. v. Service Corporation
International, et al; In the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas Houston (Funeral
Consumers Case). This is a purported class action on
behalf of casket consumers throughout the United States alleging
that SCI and several other companies involved in the funeral
industry violated federal antitrust laws and state consumer laws
by engaging in various anti-competitive conduct associated with
the sale of caskets.
SCI is also a defendant in Cause
No. 4:05-CV-03399;
Pioneer Valley Casket, et. al. v. Service Corporation
International, et al; In the United States District
Court for the Southern District of Texas ø Houston
Division (Pioneer Valley Case). This lawsuit makes
the same allegations as the Funeral Consumers Case and is also
brought against several other companies involved in the funeral
industry. Unlike the Funeral Consumers Case, the Pioneer Valley
Case is a purported class action on behalf of all independent
casket distributors that are in the business or were in the
business any time between July 18, 2001 to the present.
SCI was formerly a defendant in a related class action lawsuit
styled Ralph Lee Fancher v. Service Corporation
International, et al; In the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas-
119
Houston Division, and Cause
No. 4:05-CV-00246.
That lawsuit was dismissed in May 2006 upon request by the
plaintiffs.
The Funeral Consumers Case and the Pioneer Valley Case seek
injunctions, unspecified amounts of monetary damages, and treble
damages. In the Funeral Consumers Case, plaintiffs were seeking
the courts permission to add a claim to enjoin SCI and
Alderwoods from closing the acquisition. On July 31, 2006,
the trial court issued an order denying plaintiffs request
to add a claim to enjoin such acquisition. Since the litigation
is in its preliminary stages, SCI cannot quantify its ultimate
liability, if any, for the payment of damages.
In addition to the Funeral Consumers Case and the Pioneer Valley
Case, SCI has received Civil Investigative Demands, dated in
August 2005 and February 2006, from the Attorney General of
Maryland on behalf of itself and other state attorneys general,
who have commenced an investigation of alleged anti-competitive
practices in the funeral industry. SCI has also received similar
Civil Investigative Demands from the Attorneys General of
Florida and Connecticut.
The ultimate outcome of the matters described above cannot be
determined at this time. SCI intends to aggressively defend all
of the above lawsuits; however, an adverse decision in one or
more of such matters could have a material adverse effect on
SCI, its financial condition, results of operations, and cash
flows.
Alderwoods
Funeral Consumers Alliance, Inc. et al v. Alderwoods Group,
Inc. et al was filed in the United States District Court for
the Northern District of California in April, 2005. This case
has been transferred to the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Texas, Case No. CV3394. To date, six
separate class action lawsuits, including Francis H. Rocha v.
Alderwoods Group, Inc. et al, Marcia Berger v. Alderwoods Group,
Inc. et al, Maria Magsarili and Tony Magsarili v. Alderwoods
Group, Inc. et al, Caren Speizer v. Alderwoods Group, Inc. et
al, and Frank Moroz v. Alderwoods Group, Inc. et al, have
been consolidated into this case (Funeral Consumer
Case). Two other cases, also transferred to the United
States District Court for the Southern District of Texas,
Pioneer Valley Casket Co. v. Alderwoods Group, Inc. et al
(Pioneer Valley) and Ralph Fancher et al v.
Alderwoods Group, Inc. et al (Fancher), were
consolidated into the Funeral Consumer Case for purposes of
discovery only. On June 13, 2006, the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Texas granted
Fanchers Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, with permission to
refile its case at another time. The only two remaining cases,
therefore, are the Funeral Consumer Case and Pioneer Valley.
The Funeral Consumer Case is a purported class action on behalf
of casket consumers throughout the United States. Pioneer Valley
is a purported class action on behalf of independent casket
distributors throughout the United States. Both class suits name
as defendants the Company and three other public companies
involved in the funeral or casket industry. The Funeral Consumer
Case and Pioneer Valley allege that defendants violated federal
and state antitrust laws by engaging in anticompetitive
practices with respect to the sale and pricing of caskets. Both
cases seek injunctions, unspecified amounts of monetary damages,
and treble damages. Motions to Dismiss filed by Alderwoods and
all other defendants are pending in the Funeral Consumer Case
and Pioneer Valley. Plaintiffs in these cases have yet to
provide any meaningful information regarding their alleged
damages. As a result, Alderwoods cannot quantify its ultimate
liability, if any, for the payment of damages. Alderwoods
believes plaintiffs claims are without merit and intends
to vigorously defend itself in these actions.
In addition to the funeral and casket antitrust lawsuits,
Alderwoods has received a Civil Investigative Demand, dated
August 4, 2005, from the Attorney General of Maryland on
behalf of itself and other undisclosed state attorneys general,
who have commenced an investigation of alleged anticompetitive
practices in the funeral industry. Alderwoods has received
similar Civil Investigative Demands from the Attorneys General
of Florida and Connecticut.
120
Richard Sanchez et al v Alderwoods Group, Inc. et al was
filed in February 2005 in the Superior Court of the State of
California, for the County of Los Angeles, Central District;
Case No. BC328962. Plaintiffs seek to certify a nationwide
class on behalf of all consumers who purchased funeral goods and
services from Alderwoods. Plaintiffs allege in essence that the
Federal Trade Commissions Funeral Rule requires Alderwoods
to disclose its markups on all items obtained from third-parties
in connection with funeral service contracts. Plaintiffs allege
further that Alderwoods has failed to make such disclosures.
Plaintiffs seek to recover an unspecified amount of monetary
damages, attorneys fees, costs and unspecified
injunctive and declaratory relief. Alderwoods
believes that plaintiffs claims are without merit and
intends to vigorously defend itself in this action.
On July 7, 2005, the FTC issued a letter advisory opinion
regarding the lawful construction of the term cash advance
item as used in the FTCs Funeral Rule.
The FTC opined with regard to a similar lawsuit in Texas state
court: The Commission believes that the court is incorrect
in ruling that all goods or services purchased from a
third-party vendor are cash advance items. This interpretation
sweeps far too broadly, potentially bringing within its scope
every component good or service that comprises a funeral. This
was not and is not the Commissions intention in the
cash advance provisions of the Rule. In
Alderwoods opinion, the term cash advance item
in the Rule applies only to those items that the funeral
provider represents expressly to be cash advance
items or represents by implication to be procured on
behalf of a particular customer and provided to that customer at
the same price the funeral provider paid for them. The FTC
sets forth its analysis in the remainder of the letter. The
Company has learned that a number of plaintiffs to these actions
along with the Funeral Consumers Alliance have filed a petition
against the FTC in the District of Columbia Circuit Court asking
the Court to overturn the FTCs July 7, 2005 Advisory
Opinion.
A motion for summary judgment against plaintiffs on behalf of a
related defendant was heard on August 14, 2006. The Court
took the matter under submission and its ruling on that motion
is pending. The Courts ruling will become the law of the
case and should dictate whether identical actions against
Alderwoods are dismissed.
Reyvis Garcia and Alicia Garcia v. Alderwoods Group, Inc.,
Osiris Holding of Florida, Inc, a Florida corporation, d/b/a
Graceland Memorial Park South, f/k/a Paradise Memorial Gardens,
Inc., was filed in December 2004, in the Circuit Court of
the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County,
Florida, Case No.: 04-25646 CA 32. Plaintiffs are the son and
sister of the decedent, Eloisa Garcia, who was buried at
Graceland Memorial Park South in March 1986, when the cemetery
was owned by Paradise Memorial Gardens, Inc. Initially, the suit
sought damages on the individual claims of the Plaintiffs
relating to the burial of Eloisa Garcia. Plaintiffs claimed that
due to poor record keeping, spacing issues and maps, and the
fact that the family could not afford to purchase a marker for
the grave, the burial location of the decedent could not be
located. In July 2006, Plaintiffs amended their Complaint,
seeking to certify a class of all persons buried at this
cemetery whose burial sites cannot be located, claiming that
this is due to poor record keeping, maps and surveys at the
cemetery. The Plaintiffs are seeking unspecified monetary
damages, as well as equitable and injunctive relief. Alderwoods
believes that the Plaintiffs individual claims are without
merit. No class has been certified in this matter and Alderwoods
believes that there is no basis for a class action. Alderwoods
intends to vigorously defend itself in this action.
The ultimate outcome of the litigation matters described above
cannot be determined at this time. An adverse decision in one or
more of such matters could have a material adverse effect on
Alderwoods, its financial condition, results of operation and
cash flows. However, Alderwoods intends to aggressively defend
the lawsuits.
In addition, Alderwoods is party to other legal proceedings in
the ordinary course of business, and believes it has made
adequate provision for estimated potential liabilities.
Alderwoods does not expect the outcome of these proceedings,
individually or in the aggregate, to have a material adverse
effect on its financial position, results of operations or
liquidity.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
121
MANAGEMENT
The following table presents information with respect to our
officers and directors after completion of the acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position |
|
|
| |
|
|
R. L. Waltrip
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board |
Thomas L. Ryan
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
Michael R. Webb
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer |
J. Daniel Garrison
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Senior Vice President Operations Support |
Stephen M. Mack
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
Senior Vice President Middle Market Operations |
James M. Shelger
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
Senior Vice President General Counsel and Secretary |
Eric D. Tanzberger
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Sumner J. Waring, III
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
Senior Vice President Major Market Operations |
Christopher H. Cruger
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Vice President Business Development |
Jane D. Jones
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
Vice President Human Resources |
Albert R. Lohse
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
Vice President Corporate Governance |
Harris E. Loring, III
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
Vice President and Treasurer |
Elisabeth G. Nash
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
Vice President Continuous Process Improvement |
Donald R. Robinson
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Vice President Supply Chain Management |
Jeffrey I. Beason
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
Vice President and Corporate Controller |
Anthony L. Coelho
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
Director |
A.J. Foyt, Jr.
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
Director |
Edward E. Williams
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
Director |
Alan R. Buckwalter, III
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
Director |
Malcolm Gillis
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
Director |
Victor L. Lund
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
Director |
John W. Mecom, Jr.
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
Director |
Clifton H. Morris
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
Director |
W. Blair Waltrip
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Director |
Mr. Waltrip is the founder and Chairman of the Board of
SCI. He has provided invaluable leadership to SCI for over
40 years. A licensed funeral director, Mr. Waltrip
grew up in his familys funeral business and assumed
management of the firm in the 1950s. He began buying additional
funeral homes in the 1960s and achieved significant cost
efficiencies through the cluster strategy of sharing
pooled resources among numerous locations. At the end of 2005,
the network he began had grown to include more than 1,400
funeral service locations and cemeteries. Mr. Waltrip took
SCI public in 1969. Mr. Waltrip holds a bachelors
degree in business administration from the University of Houston.
Mr. Ryan was elected Chief Executive Officer of SCI in
February 2005 and has served as President of SCI since July
2002. Mr. Ryan joined SCI in 1996 and served in a variety
of financial management roles until November 2000, when he was
asked to serve as Chief Executive Officer of European
Operations. In July 2002, Mr. Ryan was appointed Chief
Operating Officer of SCI, a position he held until February
2005. Before joining SCI, Mr. Ryan was a certified public
accountant with Coopers & Lybrand LLP for eight years.
He holds a bachelors degree in business administration
from the University of Texas at Austin. Mr. Ryan is a
member of the Young Presidents Organization and serves on
the Board of Trustees of the Texas Gulf Coast United Way.
Mr. Webb joined SCI in 1991 when it acquired Arlington
Corporation, a regional funeral and cemetery consolidator, where
he was then Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining Arlington
Corporation,
122
Mr. Webb held various executive financial and development
roles at Days Inns of America and Telemundo Group, Inc. In 1993,
Mr. Webb joined SCIs corporate development group,
which he later led on a global basis before accepting
operational responsibility for SCIs Australian and
Hispanic businesses. Mr. Webb was promoted to Vice
President International Corporate Development in February 1998
and was named Executive Vice President in July 2002. In February
2005, he was promoted to Chief Operating Officer. He is a
graduate of the University of Georgia, where he earned a
Bachelor of Business Administration degree.
Mr. Garrison joined SCI in 1978 and worked in a series of
management positions until he was promoted to President of the
Southeastern Region in 1992. In 1998, Mr. Garrison was
promoted to Vice President International Operations. In 2000,
Mr. Garrison became Vice President North American Cemetery
Operations and was promoted to Vice President Operations
Services in August 2002. He assumed his current position as
Senior Vice President Operations Support in February 2005.
Mr. Garrison is an Administrative Management graduate of
Clemson University.
Mr. Mack joined SCI in 1973 as a resident director after
graduating from Farmingdale State University of New York. He
became Vice President of the Eastern Region in 1987 and in
February 1998 Mr. Mack was appointed Vice President North
American Funeral Operations. Mr. Mack was promoted to
Senior Vice President Eastern Operations in August 2002 and
assumed the office of Senior Vice President Middle Market
Operations, his current position, in May 2004.
Mr. Shelger joined SCI in 1981 when it acquired IFS
Industries, a regional funeral and cemetery consolidator, where
he was then General Counsel. Mr. Shelger subsequently
served as counsel for SCIs cemetery division until 1991,
when he was appointed General Counsel. Mr. Shelger
currently serves as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary of SCI. Mr. Shelger earned a Bachelor of Science
degree in Business Administration from the University of
Southern California in Los Angeles and a Juris Doctor from the
California Western School of Law in San Diego.
Mr. Tanzberger joined SCI in August 1996 as Manager of
Budgets & Financial Analysis. He was promoted to Vice
President Investor Relations and Assistant Corporate Controller
in January 2000, and to Corporate Controller in August 2002. In
February 2006, the Board of Directors promoted
Mr. Tanzberger to the position of Senior Vice President and
Corporate Controller effective immediately and to Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer effective June 30,
2006. Prior to joining SCI, Mr. Tanzberger was Assistant
Corporate Controller at Kirby Marine Transportation Corporation,
an inland waterway barge and tanker company, from January
through August 1996. Prior thereto, he was a Certified Public
Accountant with Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. for more than
five years. Mr. Tanzberger is a Certified Public Accountant
and a graduate of the University of Notre Dame, where he earned
a Bachelor of Business Administration degree.
Mr. Waring, a licensed funeral director, joined SCI as an
Area Vice President in 1996 when SCI merged with his
familys funeral business. Mr. Waring was appointed
Regional President of the Northeast Region in 1999 and was
promoted to Regional President of the Pacific Region in
September 2001. Mr. Waring was promoted to Vice President
Western Operations in August 2002 and assumed the office of Vice
President Major Market Operations in November 2003. In February
2006, Mr. Waring was promoted to Senior Vice President
Major Market Operations. Mr. Waring holds a Bachelor of
Science degree in Business Administration from Stetson
University in Deland, Florida, a degree in Mortuary Science from
Mt. Ida College and a Masters of Business Administration degree
from the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth.
Mr. Cruger oversees Corporate Development and the Dignity
Memorial®
affiliate network of independent funeral homes. He initially
served SCI as a financial analyst in the corporate development
department from 1996 until 1999, when he left to become Manager
of Financial Analysis for R. H. Donnelley Corporation. During
2000, he returned to SCI to focus on international divestitures.
From 2003 to February 2005, he served as Managing Director of
Corporate Development. In February 2005, he was promoted to Vice
President of Business Development. Mr. Cruger graduated
from Lehigh University with a Bachelor of Science in Finance.
123
Mrs. Jones joined SCI in 2003 from Dynegy, Inc., where she
served as Vice President of Total Rewards. She oversees human
resources, training and education, and payroll and commission
services activities that assist approximately 15,000 employees
in North America. Mrs. Jones was promoted to Vice President
Human Resources in February 2005. She holds a Bachelor of
Business Administration degree in Accounting with a minor in
Finance from Southern Methodist University. She is a Certified
Compensation Professional and is active in professional
organizations that include World at Work and the Society for
Human Resources Management.
Mr. Lohse joined SCI in 2000 as Managing Director of
Litigation and has since been involved in the resolution of
major litigation issues for SCI. In 2004, Mr. Lohse was
promoted to Vice President Corporate Governance. Before joining
SCI, Mr. Lohse was Managing Partner at McDade, Fogler,
Maines & Lohse where he conducted a general civil trial
practice. Prior to that, he practiced tort and commercial
litigation at Fulbright & Jaworski. Mr. Lohse
received a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from the
University of Texas and a Juris Doctor from the University of
Houston Law Center.
Mr. Loring joined SCI in March 2000 as the Managing
Director, Tax and was promoted to Assistant Treasurer in May
2004. Before joining SCI, Mr. Loring was Director, Tax at
Stone & Webster, Inc. and held various corporate tax
and treasury positions in other companies over a twenty-five
year period. In February 2006, Mr. Loring was promoted to
Vice President and Treasurer. Mr. Loring is a Certified
Public Accountant and holds a Bachelor of Business
Administration from Bryant College in North Smithfield, Rhode
Island and a Master of Science in Taxation from Bentley College,
Waltham, Massachusetts.
Ms. Nash joined SCI in 2002 as Managing Director of
Strategic Planning and Process Improvement. Prior to joining
SCI, Ms. Nash worked for the Pennzoil Corporation and held
various senior management accounting and financial positions. In
2004, Ms. Nash was promoted to Vice President Continuous
Process Improvement. Her primary responsibilities include
improving operating systems; reducing overhead costs; and
identifying and assisting in the implementation of initiatives
to improve operating profit margins and cash flow. She is a
graduate of Texas A&M University where she received a
Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Accounting.
Mr. Robinson joined SCI in 1996 as Director of Procurement.
Prior to joining SCI, Mr. Robinson was employed by Marathon
Oil Company, where he spent 16 years in a variety of
procurement, logistics and information technology positions. In
February 2005, he was promoted to Vice President Supply Chain
Management. Prior to this promotion, he was Managing Director of
Business Support Services, a position in which he oversaw fleet
management and office services; voice services, travel and
shipping services; and supply chain and purchasing activities.
Mr. Robinson holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business
Administration with a minor in Computer Service from Taylor
University in Upland, Indiana.
Mr. Beason joined SCI in July 2006 as Vice President and
Corporate Controller. Prior to SCI, he was an employee of
El Paso Corporation, a natural gas transmission and
production company. Mr. Beason joined El Paso
Corporation in 1978 and held various accounting and reporting
roles until 1993. From 1993 to 1996, he held the position of Sr.
Vice President Administration of Mojave Pipeline Operating
Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of El Paso Corporation.
From 1996 to November 2005, Mr. Beason was Sr. Vice
President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of
El Paso Corporation. He is a Certified Public Accountant
licensed in the State of Texas and holds a bachelors of
business administration in accounting from the Texas Tech
University.
Mr. Coelho was a member of the U.S. House of
Representatives from 1978 to 1989. After leaving Congress, he
joined Wertheim Schroder & Company, an investment
banking firm in New York and became President and CEO of
Wertheim Schroder Financial Services. From October 1995 to
September 1997, he served as Chairman and CEO of an education
and training technology company that he established and
subsequently sold. He served as general chairman of the
presidential campaign of former Vice President Al Gore from
April 1999 until June 2000. Since 1997, Mr. Coelho has
worked independently as a business and political consultant.
Mr. Coelho also served as Chairman of the Presidents
Committee on Employment of People with Disabilities from 1994 to
2001. He is currently
124
serving as Chairman of the Board of the Epilepsy Foundation.
Mr. Coelho is a member of the board of directors of
Cyberonics, Inc. and Warren Resources, Inc.
Mr. Foyt achieved prominence as a racing driver who was the
first four-time winner of the Indianapolis 500. His racing
career spanned four decades and three continents
North America, Europe and Australia. Since his retirement from
racing in 1994, Mr. Foyt has engaged in a variety of
commercial and entrepreneurial ventures. He is the President and
owner of A. J. Foyt Enterprises, Inc. (assembly, exhibition and
competition with high-speed engines and racing vehicles), and
has owned and operated car dealerships that bear his name. He
has also been involved in a number of commercial real estate
investment and development projects, and has served as a
director of a Texas bank.
Dr. Williams holds the Henry Gardiner Symonds Chair (an
endowed professorship) and is Director of the Entrepreneurship
Program at the Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Management at
Rice University, where he teaches classes on entrepreneurship,
value creation, venture capital investing, business valuations,
leveraged buyouts and the acquisition of existing concerns.
Dr. Williams has been named by Business Week as the Number
Two Entrepreneurship Professor in the United States.
Dr. Williams holds a Ph.D. with specialization in Finance,
Accounting and Economics. He has taught finance, accounting,
economics and entrepreneurship at the graduate level, has
written numerous articles in finance, accounting, economics and
entrepreneurship journals, has taught courses in financial
statement analysis and continues to do academic research in his
areas of specialty. He is the author or co-author of over 40
articles and nine books on business planning, entrepreneurship,
investment analysis, accounting and finance.
Mr. Buckwalter retired in 2003 as Chairman of JPMorgan
Chase Bank, South Region after a career of over 30 years in
banking that involved management of corporate, commercial,
capital markets, international, private banking and retail
departments. He served as head of the Banking Division and
Leveraged Finance Unit within the Banking and Corporate Finance
Group of Chemical Bank and Chairman and CEO of Chase Bank of
Texas. Mr. Buckwalter has attended executive management
programs at Harvard Business School and the Stanford Executive
Program at Stanford University. He is also an avid community
volunteer, serving on the Boards of Texas Medical Center, the
American Red Cross (Houston chapter), St. Lukes Episcopal
Health System and Baylor College of Medicine.
Mr. Buckwalter is a member of the board of directors of
Plains Exploration and Production Company.
Malcolm Gillis, Ph.D., is a University Professor and former
President of Rice University, a position he held from 1993 to
June 2004. He is an internationally respected academician and
widely published author in the field of economics with major
experience in fiscal reform and environmental policy.
Dr. Gillis has taught at Harvard and Duke Universities and
has held named professorships at Duke and Rice Universities. He
has served as a consultant to numerous U.S. agencies and
foreign governments. Additionally, he has held memberships in
many national and international committees, boards, and advisory
councils. He holds Bachelors and Masters degrees
from the University of Florida and a Doctorate from the
University of Illinois. Mr. Gillis is a member of the board
of directors of Electronic Data Systems Corp., Halliburton Co.
and Introgen Therapeutics, Inc.
Mr. Lund, from May 2002 to December 2004, served as
Chairman of the Board of Mariner Healthcare, Inc. From 1999 to
2002, he served as Vice Chairman of the Board of Albertsons,
Inc. prior to which he had a
22-year career with
American Stores Company in various positions, including Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer and corporate controller. Prior to that time,
Mr. Lund was a practicing audit CPA for five years, held a
CPA license and received the highest score on the CPA exam in
the State of Utah in the year that he was licensed. He also
holds an MBA and a BA in Accounting. Mr. Lund is a member
of the board of directors of Borders Group Inc., Del Monte Foods
Company and NCR Corporation.
Mr. Mecom has been involved in the purchase, management and
sale of business interests in a variety of industries. He has
owned and managed over 500,000 acres of surface and mineral
interests throughout the U.S. He has been involved in the
purchase, renovation, management and sale of luxury hotels in
the U.S., Peru and Mexico. He purchased the New Orleans Saints
NFL team in 1967 and sold his interest in 1985. He is currently
Chairman of the John W. Mecom Company, principal owner of John
Gardiners
125
Tennis Ranch and Chairman of the Board and principal owner of
Rhino Pak (a contract blender and packer for the petroleum
industry).
Mr. Morris has been Chairman of AmeriCredit Corp.
(financing of automotive vehicles) since May 1988, previously
having served as Chief Executive Officer and President of that
company. Previously, he served as Chief Financial Officer of
Cash America International, prior to which he owned his own
public accounting firm. He is a certified public accountant with
43 years of certification, a Lifetime Member of the Texas
Society of Certified Public Accountants and an Honorary Member
of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
Mr. Morris was instrumental in the early formulation and
initial public offerings of SCI, Cash America International and
AmeriCredit Corp., all of which are now listed on the New York
Stock Exchange. From 1966 to 1971, he served as a Vice President
in treasury or financial positions at SCI, returning to serve on
SCIs Board of Directors in 1990. Mr. Morris was named
2001 Business Executive of the Year by the Fort Worth
Business Hall of Fame. He is also an avid community volunteer,
having served on the Community Foundation of North Texas,
Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce and Fort Worth Country
Day School. Mr. Morris is a member of the board of
directors of AmeriCredit Corp.
Mr. Blair Waltrip held various positions with SCI from 1977
to 2000, including serving as vice president of corporate
development, senior vice president of funeral operations,
executive vice president of SCIs real estate division,
Chairman and CEO of Service Corporation International (Canada)
Limited (a subsidiary taken public on The Toronto Stock
Exchange) and Executive Vice President of SCI.
Mr. Waltrips experience has provided him with
knowledge of almost all aspects of SCI and its industry with
specific expertise in North American funeral/cemetery operations
and real estate management. Since leaving SCI in 2000,
Mr. Waltrip has been an independent investor, primarily
engaged in overseeing family and trust investments.
Mr. Waltrip is the son of SCIs founder, R. L.
Waltrip. Mr. Waltrip is a member of the board of directors
of Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc.
Each officer of SCI is elected by the Board of Directors and
holds their office until a successor is elected and qualified or
until earlier death, resignation or removal in the manner
prescribed in SCIs Bylaws. Each officer of a subsidiary of
SCI is elected by the subsidiarys board of directors and
holds their office until a successor is elected and qualified or
until earlier death, resignation or removal in the manner
prescribed in the Bylaws of the subsidiary.
126
Executive compensation
SCI Cash Compensation
The following table sets forth information for the three years
ended December 31, 2005 with respect to the Chief Executive
Officer and the four other most highly compensated executive
officers of SCI. The determination as to which executive
officers were most highly compensated was made with reference to
the amounts disclosed under the Salary and
Bonus columns in the table.
SCI Summary Compensation
Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation | |
|
Long-Term Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards | |
|
Payouts | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted | |
|
Underlying | |
|
Long-Term | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Annual | |
|
Stock | |
|
Stock | |
|
Incentive | |
|
All Other | |
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year | |
|
Salary | |
|
Bonus | |
|
Compensation(1) | |
|
Award(2)(3) | |
|
Options(2) | |
|
Payouts(4) | |
|
Compensation(5) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
R. L. Waltrip
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
950,000 |
|
|
$ |
979,498 |
|
|
$ |
420,963 |
|
|
$ |
578,488 |
|
|
|
189,400 |
|
|
$ |
3,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
223,564 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
986,538 |
|
|
|
492,860 |
|
|
|
345,628 |
|
|
|
498,960 |
|
|
|
150,200 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
428,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
980,269 |
|
|
|
1,581,750 |
|
|
|
535,806 |
|
|
|
597,520 |
|
|
|
102,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
43,779 |
|
Thomas L. Ryan
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
800,000 |
|
|
|
824,840 |
|
|
|
85,974 |
|
|
|
795,160 |
|
|
|
260,400 |
|
|
|
2,200,000 |
|
|
|
341,971 |
|
|
President and Chief |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
541,440 |
|
|
|
272,370 |
|
|
|
135,359 |
|
|
|
587,664 |
|
|
|
177,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
14,058 |
|
|
Executive Officer |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
440,673 |
|
|
|
599,400 |
|
|
|
78,024 |
|
|
|
336,105 |
|
|
|
57,500 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
14,058 |
|
Michael R. Webb
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
575,000 |
|
|
|
592,854 |
|
|
|
24,141 |
|
|
|
361,736 |
|
|
|
118,400 |
|
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
|
|
265,016 |
|
|
Executive Vice President |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
466,058 |
|
|
|
233,460 |
|
|
|
27,371 |
|
|
|
338,184 |
|
|
|
101,900 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
and Chief Operating Officer |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
416,153 |
|
|
|
566,100 |
|
|
|
23,496 |
|
|
|
271,600 |
|
|
|
46,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
17,957 |
|
Sumner J. Waring, III
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
348,226 |
|
|
|
30,093 |
|
|
|
162,328 |
|
|
|
53,200 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
166,471 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
320,422 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
5,819 |
|
|
|
319,470 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
13,568 |
|
|
Major Market Operations |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
273,808 |
|
|
|
241,080 |
|
|
|
6,626 |
|
|
|
149,710 |
|
|
|
25,500 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
13,346 |
|
Stephen M. Mack
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
316,579 |
|
|
|
15,780 |
|
|
|
162,328 |
|
|
|
53,200 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
185,977 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
363,462 |
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
7,259 |
|
|
|
283,590 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
54,851 |
|
|
Middle Market Operations |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
356,731 |
|
|
|
153,300 |
|
|
|
6,857 |
|
|
|
139,503 |
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
17,404 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes the incremental cost of personal use of SCI aircraft to
the extent not reimbursed to SCI: Mr. R. L. Waltrip,
$205,617 in 2005, $146,706 in 2004 and $180,950 in 2003;
Mr. Ryan, $13,491 in 2005 and $15,074 in 2004;
Mr. Webb, $17,841 in 2005, $20,592 in 2004 and $13,265 in
2003; Mr. Waring, $22,758 in 2005; Mr. Mack, $4,692 in
2005. Also includes $142,460 in 2005, $144,835 in 2004 and
$130,413 in 2003 for security and transportation services
provided for Mr. R. L. Waltrip. For 2005, the amounts also
include $43,881 for foreign tax reimbursement and preparation
and $25,168 for related gross up for Mr. Ryan. For each of
Messrs. Webb, Waring and Mack, the aggregate of the
executives perquisites and benefits in 2005 did not exceed
the lesser of $50,000 or 10 percent of the total of the
executives annual salary and bonus. In prior years,
certain of the figures reported were calculated using a
different cost method and differ from those reported here. |
|
(2) |
Awards of restricted stock and stock options set forth in the
table for 2005, 2004 and 2003 reflect awards granted,
respectively, in February 2006, February 2005 and February 2004. |
|
(3) |
At December 31, 2005, the number and value of unvested
restricted stock holdings (including restricted stock awards
made in February 2006) of the listed executives were as
follows: Mr. R. L. Waltrip: 200,867 shares
($1,643,092); Mr. Ryan: 214,300 shares ($1,752,974);
Mr. Webb: 119,367 shares ($976,422); Mr. Waring:
80,667 shares ($659,856) and Mr. Mack:
74,467 shares ($609,140). Dividends paid on SCI common
stock will also be paid on restricted shares. The restricted
shares vest 1/3 on each anniversary of the grant date and will
vest 100% in the event of certain terminations or a change of
control (as defined in the Amended 1996 Incentive Plan). |
|
(4) |
Consists of the payout in February 2006 of cash performance
units previously awarded in February 2003 regarding the three
year performance period ended December 31, 2005. For
information concerning cash performance units awarded in
February 2006, see the caption SCI Long-Term Incentive
Plan: Performance Units herein below. |
|
(5) |
Consists of the following for 2005: $204,115 for reimbursement
of life insurance premium and related taxes (as described in
Other Compensation below), $2,439 for term life
insurance and $17,010 for SCI contributions to the SCIs
401(k) plan for Mr. R. L. Waltrip; $858 for term life
insurance, |
127
|
|
|
$13,860 for SCI contributions to the SCIs 401(k) plan and
$327,253 for SCI contributions to the Executive Deferred
Compensation Plan for Mr. Ryan; $1,757 for term life
insurance, $17,010 for SCI contributions to the SCIs
401(k) plan, and $246,248 for SCI contributions to the Executive
Deferred Compensation Plan for Mr. Webb; $248 for term life
insurance, $13,860 for SCI contributions to SCIs 401(k)
plan and $152,363 for SCI contributions to the Executive
Deferred Compensation Plan for Mr. Waring; $23,109 for
reimbursement of life insurance premium and related taxes, $316
for term life insurance, $17,010 for SCI contributions to
SCIs 401(k) plan and $145,542 for SCI contributions to the
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan for Mr. Mack. |
SCI Stock Options
The following table sets forth stock options granted in February
2006 for 2005 performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
Options | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SCI Shares | |
|
Granted to | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying | |
|
Employees | |
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date | |
|
|
|
|
Options | |
|
in Year | |
|
Price per | |
|
Expiration | |
|
Present | |
Name |
|
Grant Date(1) | |
|
Granted(1) | |
|
of Grant | |
|
Share(2) | |
|
Date | |
|
Value(3) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
R. L. Waltrip
|
|
|
02/07/06 |
|
|
|
189,400 |
|
|
|
11.82% |
|
|
$ |
8.240 |
|
|
|
02/07/14 |
|
|
$ |
598,031 |
|
Thomas L. Ryan
|
|
|
02/07/06 |
|
|
|
260,400 |
|
|
|
16.25% |
|
|
$ |
8.240 |
|
|
|
02/07/14 |
|
|
|
822,213 |
|
Michael R. Webb
|
|
|
02/07/06 |
|
|
|
118,400 |
|
|
|
7.39% |
|
|
$ |
8.240 |
|
|
|
02/07/14 |
|
|
|
373,848 |
|
Sumner J. Waring, III
|
|
|
02/07/06 |
|
|
|
53,200 |
|
|
|
3.32% |
|
|
$ |
8.240 |
|
|
|
02/07/14 |
|
|
|
167,979 |
|
Stephen M. Mack
|
|
|
02/07/06 |
|
|
|
53,200 |
|
|
|
3.32% |
|
|
$ |
8.240 |
|
|
|
02/07/14 |
|
|
|
167,979 |
|
|
|
(1) |
The stock options vest one-third on each anniversary of the
grant date. Each option will also fully vest upon a change of
control of SCI (as defined in the Amended 1996 Incentive Plan). |
|
(2) |
The exercise price for all grants is the market price at the
date of grant. |
|
(3) |
The present value of the options is based on a present value
model known as the Black-Scholes option pricing
model. The choice of such valuation method does not
reflect any belief by SCI that such a method, or any other
valuation method, can accurately assign a value to an option at
the grant date. The assumptions used for valuing the 2006 grants
are: volatility rate of 38.80%; annual dividend yield of 1.5%;
turnover rate of 3%; and risk free interest rate of 4.30%. |
SCI Aggregated Option
Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and December 31, 2005 Option
Values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying Unexercised | |
|
Value of Unexercised | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
Options at | |
|
In-the-Money Options at | |
|
|
Acquired | |
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
on | |
|
Value | |
|
| |
|
| |
Name |
|
Exercise | |
|
Realized | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable(1) | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
R. L. Waltrip
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
7,287,003 |
|
|
|
407,600 |
|
|
$ |
12,802,690 |
|
|
$ |
279,210 |
|
Thomas L. Ryan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
561,666 |
|
|
|
475,734 |
|
|
|
2,066,369 |
|
|
|
272,809 |
|
Michael R. Webb
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
587,833 |
|
|
|
250,967 |
|
|
|
2,061,214 |
|
|
|
168,622 |
|
Sumner J. Waring, III
|
|
|
33,000 |
|
|
$ |
111,393 |
|
|
|
78,500 |
|
|
|
70,200 |
|
|
|
384,883 |
|
|
|
22,865 |
|
Stephen M. Mack
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
295,830 |
|
|
|
712,680 |
|
|
|
69,200 |
|
|
|
1,658,130 |
|
|
|
21,520 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes stock options granted in February 2006. |
SCI Long-Term Incentive
Plan: Performance Units
The following table shows information regarding cash performance
units awarded the Named Executive Officers in February 2006 for
2005 performance.
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated future payouts | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
under non-stock price based plan(2) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
Threshold | |
|
Target | |
|
Maximum | |
Name |
|
units(1) | |
|
Performance period | |
|
($) | |
|
($) | |
|
($) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
R. L. Waltrip
|
|
|
665,800 |
|
|
|
1/1/06-12/31/08 |
|
|
$ |
166,450 |
|
|
$ |
665,800 |
|
|
$ |
1,331,600 |
|
Thomas L. Ryan
|
|
|
915,500 |
|
|
|
1/1/06-12/31/08 |
|
|
|
228,875 |
|
|
|
915,500 |
|
|
|
1,831,000 |
|
Michael R. Webb
|
|
|
416,200 |
|
|
|
1/1/06-12/31/08 |
|
|
|
104,050 |
|
|
|
416,200 |
|
|
|
832,400 |
|
Sumner J. Waring, II
|
|
|
187,300 |
|
|
|
1/1/06-12/31/08 |
|
|
|
46,825 |
|
|
|
187,300 |
|
|
|
374,600 |
|
Stephen M. Mack
|
|
|
187,300 |
|
|
|
1/1/06-12/31/08 |
|
|
|
46,825 |
|
|
|
187,300 |
|
|
|
374,600 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Each unit is valued at $1.00. |
|
(2) |
Actual payouts are a function of relative Total Shareholder
Return (TSR) of SCI compared to TSR of a comparison
group at the end of the three year period. The absolute TSR of
SCI must be greater than zero and at or above the threshold
target to trigger a payout. In 2006, the plan was simplified to
pay out at threshold for achievement of minimum established
targets, at target for expected level of performance and a
maximum award of 200% for achieving 75th percentile or
better performance, provided that no individual payout may
exceed $3 million. |
Alderwoods Equity and
Long-Term Incentive Plans
Alderwoods equity and long-term incentive plans consist of
its Director Compensation Plan, its
2005-2007 Executive
Strategic Incentive Plan (the
2005-2007
Plan), its 2002 Equity Incentive Plan and its 2005 Equity
Incentive Plan. Under the Director Compensation Plan,
Alderwoods directors may elect to defer their fees in
common stock. In connection with the acquisition, each share of
Alderwoods common stock held in the deferral accounts under the
Director Compensation Plan will be cancelled and converted into
the right to receive the acquisition consideration. Under the
2005-2007 Plan, certain
of Alderwoods officers can earn cash awards based on the
company attaining specified stock price targets. In connection
with the acquisition, all amounts under the
2005-2007 Plan will
vest 100% and be payable within 30 days of the closing. The
aggregate amount payable under the
2005-2007 Plan will
equal approximately $11,200,000. The 2002 Equity Incentive Plan
and the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan provide for the grant of
stock options and restricted stock units to Alderwoods
directors and officers. In connection with the acquisition, each
outstanding stock option will be cancelled in exchange for the
right to receive the acquisition consideration, net of the
options exercise price. In connection with the
acquisition, all restricted stock units will be cancelled and
converted into the right to receive the acquisition
consideration. The aggregate cash value to be received by
Alderwoods directors and officers in connection with the
acquisition for their outstanding stock options and restricted
stock units is approximately $36,000,000.
Retirement Plans
SCI Cash Balance Plan
The SCI Cash Balance Plan is a defined benefit plan which was
amended effective January 1, 2001 such that SCI would not
make any further contributions under the plan after 2000. Each
participant in the plan has an account which, until
December 31, 2000, was credited each year that a
participant qualified with a SCI contribution (based on annual
compensation and years of benefit service) and interest. Plan
accounts continue to accrue interest and, for 2005, interest for
each account was credited at the annual rate of 3.78%.
129
Estimated Annual Benefits
Payable at Age 65
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Annual Benefit |
|
|
|
R. L. Waltrip
|
|
$ |
118,852 |
(1) |
Thomas L. Ryan
|
|
|
13,866 |
(2) |
Michael R. Webb
|
|
|
28,712 |
(2) |
Sumner J. Waring, III
|
|
|
11,739 |
(2) |
Stephen M. Mack
|
|
|
47,323 |
(2) |
|
|
(1) |
Currently being paid. |
|
(2) |
The estimated annual benefit amount assumes no contributions
being made to the plan after December 31, 2000 and assumes
interest being credited only until age 65. |
At retirement or termination, the participant may elect to
receive his or her vested benefit as a lump sum distribution, a
monthly payout or a rollover to an IRA or other tax qualified
plan. Normal Retirement Age is defined in the SCI Cash Balance
Plan as (1) the date upon which a member attains
age 65 or (2) in the case of an employee who becomes a
member of the SCI Cash Balance Plan after the age of 60, it will
be the fifth anniversary of the date that such member became a
participant.
SCI Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan for Senior Officers
In 2000, SCI amended the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
for Senior Officers (SERP for Senior Officers)
effective January 1, 2001. Under the amendment, no
additional benefits will accrue and no employees shall become
eligible to participate in the plan after 2000.
The SERP for Senior Officers is a non-qualified plan which
covers executive officers and certain regional operating
officers, including the Named Executive Officers. Benefits under
the SERP for Senior Officers do not consist of compensation
deferred at the election of participants. The amounts of
benefits under the plan were previously set by the Compensation
Committee from time to time. The Compensation Committee
previously set guidelines such that the annual benefits would
generally equal a percentage (75% for the CEO and lesser
percentages for the other officers) of a participants 1997
annual base salary and target bonus, with the benefits being
reduced to the extent of the participants benefits under
Social Security and the SCI Cash Balance Plan. The participant
will be entitled at age 60 to the annual payment of the
full amount of his benefit; if his employment terminates earlier
than age 60, he will be entitled to the annual payment of
the amount of his benefit multiplied by a fraction of which the
numerator is the participants years of service and the
denominator is the number of years from the participants
hire date until he reaches age 60.
Benefit payments will be made in the form of 180 monthly
installments commencing at the later of severance of employment
or the attainment of age 55. Prior to retirement, if a
participant dies or in the event of a change of control of SCI
(as defined in the SERP for Senior Officers), SCI will promptly
pay to each beneficiary or participant a lump sum equal to the
present value of the benefit that the participant would have
been entitled to receive if he had continued to accrue benefit
service from the date of death or the date of the change of
control to the date of his 65th birthday. Participants may
elect to begin receiving monthly benefits at age 55, while
still employed, provided the participant gives written notice at
least twelve months prior to the attainment of age 55. Such
installments will be reduced for early commencement to
reasonably reflect the time value of money.
130
The table below sets forth benefits for the Named Executive
Officers.
Annual Benefits under SERP
for SCIs Senior Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Annual Benefit |
|
|
at Age 60 |
|
|
|
R. L. Waltrip
|
|
$ |
1,110,773 |
(1) |
Thomas L. Ryan
|
|
|
18,968 |
|
Michael R. Webb
|
|
|
42,725 |
|
Sumner J. Waring III
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen M. Mack
|
|
|
72,583 |
|
|
|
(1) |
This is Mr. R. L. Waltrips actual benefit which,
pursuant to his election, is being paid in the form of monthly
installments since January 1, 1995. During 2003, SCI
prepaid to Mr. Waltrip the last 36 payments due to him
under the plan. |
SCI Executive Deferred
Compensation Plan
The Compensation Committee approved a new plan in 2005 for the
purpose of providing a more competitive compensation package to
be used for retention and recruitment of executive level talent.
The addition of the supplemental retirement and deferred
compensation plan for the Named Executive Officers below, the
Chairman of the Board, and other officers allows for an annual
retirement contribution of 7.5% and a performance based
contribution targeted at 7.5%, with a range of 0% to 15% based
on achievement of SCI performance measures established in the
first quarter of 2006. The percentages are applied to the
combined eligible compensation of base salary and annual
incentive bonus paid. The plan allows for individual deferral of
base salary, annual incentive bonus awards, and long term
incentives payable in cash (performance unit awards). In
addition, the plan allows for the restoration of SCI matching
contributions that are currently prohibited in SCIs 401(k)
plan due to imposed tax limits on contributions to qualified
plans. This plan is also available to senior level management
positions with an annual retirement contribution of 5% and
individual deferrals. For the initial year of the plan, a
contribution was made on behalf of each officer representing 10%
of their eligible compensation in the following amounts: $79,737
for Mr. Ryan, $68,346 for Mr. Webb, $46,000 for
Mr. Waring, and $44,000 for Mr. Mack. In February
2006, the contributions for retirement and performance made to
the plan for 2005 performance on behalf of the Named Executive
Officers were as follows: $247,516 for Mr. Ryan, $177,902
for Mr. Webb, $106,363 for Mr. Waring and $101,542 for
Mr. Mack.
Executive Employment
Agreements
Employment Agreement
with the Chairman of the Board of SCI
SCI has an executive employment agreement with Mr. R. L.
Waltrip which expires December 31, 2006. The agreement
provides for a base salary, which cannot be decreased but may be
increased by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion.
As of June 30, 2006, the base salary for Mr. R. L.
Waltrip was $950,000. The terms of the agreement also provide
that Mr. R. L. Waltrip shall have the right to participate
in bonus and other compensation and benefit arrangements.
In the event of termination of employment due to disability or
death, Mr. R. L. Waltrip or his estate will be entitled to
receive any accrued and unpaid salary or other compensation, a
pro rata portion (based on the portion of the year elapsed at
the date of termination) of the highest bonus he received in the
preceding three years and continuation of welfare plan benefits
for five years. If he is terminated without cause or he
voluntarily terminates for specified reasons generally relating
to a failure by SCI to honor the terms of the employment
agreement (Good Reason), he will be entitled to
continuation of compensation and certain other benefits for the
remaining term of his employment agreement. In the event of a
change of control of SCI (as defined in the agreement),
Mr. R. L. Waltrip will be entitled to terminate his
employment for Good Reason, or without any reason during the
30-day period beginning
one
131
year after the change of control (the Window
Period), and receive a lump-sum payment equal to
(a) any accrued and unpaid salary or other compensation
plus (b) a pro rata portion (based on the portion of the
year elapsed at the date of termination) of the highest bonus he
received in the preceding three years plus (c) an amount
equal to five times his base salary plus his highest recent
bonus; further, he will be entitled to continuation of welfare
plan benefits for the remaining term of his employment
agreement. Upon termination of Mr. R. L. Waltrips
employment, he will be subject to a 10 year non-competition
obligation; however, SCI will not be required to make any
further payments to Mr. Waltrip for the non-competition
obligation. If any payments under the executive employment
agreement or under the benefit plans of SCI would subject
Mr. R. L. Waltrip to any excise tax under the Internal
Revenue Code, he will also be entitled to receive an additional
payment in an amount such that, after the payment of all taxes
(income and excise), he will be in the same after-tax position
as if no excise tax had been imposed. In 2005,
Mr. Waltrips agreement was modified to incorporate
language requiring compliance with IRC §409A.
Other Named Executive
Officers of SCI
SCI also has employment agreements with Messrs. Thomas L.
Ryan, Michael R. Webb, Sumner J. Waring, III and Stephen M.
Mack. These agreements have current terms expiring
December 31, 2006. Annually, SCI may extend each agreement
for an additional year unless notice of nonrenewal is given by
either party. If such notice of nonrenewal is given by SCI or if
notice is not given of SCIs decision to authorize renewal,
the employment agreement will not be extended.
These agreements provide for base salaries, which cannot be
decreased but may be increased by the Compensation Committee,
and the right to participate in bonus and other compensation and
benefit arrangements. As of June 30, 2006, the base
salaries for Messrs. Ryan, Webb, Waring and Mack were
$800,000, $575,000, $375,000 and $375,000, respectively.
In the event of termination of employment due to disability or
death, the executive or his estate will be entitled to receive
(i) his salary through the end of his employment term, and
(ii) a pro rata portion (based on the portion of the year
elapsed at the date of termination) of the bonus the executive
would have received if he had remained an employee through his
employment term (Pro Rated Bonus). In the event of
termination by SCI without cause, the executive will be entitled
to receive salary (two years salary for Messrs. Ryan and
Webb and one years salary for Messrs. Waring and Mack), Pro
Rated Bonus and continuation of health benefits equal to the
years of salary continuation noted above. In the event of a
change of control of SCI (as defined in the agreements), the
executive will be entitled to terminate his employment for
certain specified reasons during the two years following the
change of control, and receive (i) a lump-sum payment equal
to a multiple of the sum of his annual salary plus his target
bonus, which multiple is three for Messrs. Ryan and Webb
and two for Messrs. Waring and Mack (ii) a prorated
target bonus, and (iii) continuation of health benefits for
three years for Messrs. Ryan and Webb and two years for
Messrs. Waring and Mack. If any payments under the
employment agreement or under the benefit plans of SCI would
subject the executive to any excise tax under the Internal
Revenue Code, the executive will also be entitled to receive an
additional payment in an amount such that, after the payment of
all taxes (income and excise), he will be in the same after-tax
position as if no excise tax had been imposed. The agreements
have incorporated language requiring compliance with IRC
§409A.
Upon termination of his employment, each executive will be
subject, at SCIs option, to a non-competition obligation
for a period of one year which SCI may extend for one additional
year. If SCI elects to have the non-competition provisions
apply, SCI will make payments to the executive during the
non-competition period at a rate equal to his base salary at the
time of termination, unless such termination was for cause or
the executive terminates his employment (other than within
twenty-four months after a change of control for certain
specified reasons), in which case the executive will be bound by
the non-competition provisions without SCI making the
corresponding payments.
132
Alderwoods Employment
Agreements
Alderwoods is a party to employment agreements with its
executive officers, which entitle the officers to cash severance
payments in the event the executive is terminated as a result of
a change of control. If each of the executive officers is
terminated in connection with the acquisition under
circumstances which would entitle them to severance, the
aggregate cash severance payments due to such officers would
equal approximately $9,600,000.
Other Compensation for SCI
Officers
Mr. R. L. Waltrip, Stephen M. Mack and certain other
officers participate in the Split Dollar Life Insurance Plan,
under which they are owners of life insurance policies.
Mr. R. L. Waltrips policy provides a death benefit of
$2,000,000 and Mr. Macks policy provides a death
benefit of $500,000. In December of 2003, the Split Dollar Life
Insurance policies of Messrs. Waltrip, Mack and certain
other officers were changed to an arrangement whereby the
individuals now pay the premiums and SCI provides a bonus to
offset the premiums and related taxes. As part of the conversion
to SCI bonus plan, the policies were restructured and allow SCI
to receive its interest in the policies (representing the
cumulative premiums paid by SCI prior to July 31, 2002).
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT
The table below sets forth information with respect to any
person who is known to SCI as of June 30, 2006 to be the
beneficial owner of more than five percent of SCIs Common
Stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount | |
|
|
|
|
Beneficially | |
|
Percent | |
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
|
Owned | |
|
of Class | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, Inc.
|
|
|
31,473,480 |
(1) |
|
|
10.8% |
|
|
2200 Ross Avenue, 31st Floor
Dallas, Texas 75201-2761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FMR Corp., Fidelity Management & Research Company,
Fidelity Leveraged Co. Stock Fund and Edward C. Johnson, 3d
|
|
|
46,305,925 |
(2) |
|
|
15.8% |
|
|
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southeastern Asset Management, Inc., Longleaf Partners Small-Cap
Fund and O. Mason Hawkins
|
|
|
15,543,300 |
(3) |
|
|
5.3% |
|
|
6410 Poplar Ave., Suite 900
Memphis, TN 38119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vanguard Windsor Funds Vanguard Windsor II Fund
23-2439135
|
|
|
26,080,100 |
(4) |
|
|
8.9% |
|
|
(Windsor II)
100 Vanguard Blvd
Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Based on a filing made by Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney &
Strauss, Inc. on February 7, 2006, which reported sole
voting power for 806,080 shares, shared voting power for
30,667,400 shares, sole investment power for
31,473,480 shares and shared investment power for no
shares. BHMS has informed SCI that the shares reported in the
table as beneficially owned by BHMS include all
26,080,100 shares reported in the table as beneficially
owned by Windsor II, for whom BHMS is an investment manager. |
|
(2) |
Based on a filing made by the named companies and person on
February 14, 2006, which reported sole voting power for
3,253,425 shares, shared voting power for no shares, sole
investment power for 46,305,925 shares and shared
investment power for no shares. |
|
(3) |
Based on a filing made by the named companies and person on
February 10, 2006, which reported sole voting power for no
shares, shared voting power for 15,286,300 shares, sole
investment power for 257,000 shares and shared investment
power for 15,286,300 shares. |
133
|
|
(4) |
Based on a filing made by the named fund on February 13,
2006, which reported sole voting power for
26,080,100 shares, shared voting power for no shares, sole
investment power for no shares and shared investment power for
no shares. BHMS has informed SCI that the shares reported in the
table as beneficially owned by BHMS include all
26,080,100 shares reported in the table as beneficially
owned by Windsor II, for whom BHMS is an investment manager. |
The table below sets forth, as of June 30, 2006, the amount
of SCIs Common Stock beneficially owned by each Named
Executive Officer, each director and nominee for director, and
all directors and executive officers as a group, based upon
information obtained from such persons. Securities reported as
beneficially owned include those for which the persons listed
have sole voting and investment power, unless otherwise noted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Right to | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquire Ownership | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Options | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable Within | |
|
Percent of | |
Name of Individual or Group |
|
Shares Owned | |
|
60 Days | |
|
Class | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
R. L. Waltrip
|
|
|
1,724,311 |
(1) |
|
|
6,931,069 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
Thomas L. Ryan
|
|
|
306,731 |
|
|
|
639,833 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Michael R. Webb
|
|
|
227,109 |
|
|
|
637,132 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Sumner J. Waring, III
|
|
|
201,740 |
|
|
|
87,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Stephen M. Mack
|
|
|
109,775 |
|
|
|
720,680 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Alan R. Buckwalter
|
|
|
56,987 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Anthony L. Coelho
|
|
|
91,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
A. J. Foyt, Jr
|
|
|
139,628 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Malcolm Gillis
|
|
|
29,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Victor L. Lund
|
|
|
81,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
John W. Mecom, Jr
|
|
|
70,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Clifton H. Morris, Jr
|
|
|
114,227 |
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
W. Blair Waltrip
|
|
|
2,136,202 |
(5) |
|
|
410,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Edward E. Williams
|
|
|
239,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (24 persons)
|
|
|
5,672,540 |
|
|
|
12,130,444 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
Includes 468,384 shares held in trusts under which
Mr. R. L. Waltrips three children, as trustees,
share voting and investment powers; Mr. R. L. Waltrip
disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares. These shares are
also included in the shares owned by Mr. W. Blair Waltrip.
See Footnote (5). Also includes 530,133 shares held by
trusts of which Mr. R. L. Waltrip is the trustee
having sole voting and investment powers. |
|
(2) |
Includes 2,800 shares held by Mr. Buckwalter as custodian
for family members. Mr. Buckwalter has sole voting and
investment power for such shares and disclaims beneficial
ownership of such shares. |
|
(3) |
Includes 17,885 shares held by Mr. Foyt as custodian for
family members. Mr. Foyt has sole voting and investment
power for such shares and disclaims beneficial ownership of such
shares. Also includes 200 shares owned by Mr. Foyts
wife. |
|
(4) |
Includes 4,034 shares owned by Mr. Morriss wife.
Mr. Morris disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares. |
|
(5) |
Includes 152,204 shares held in a trust for the benefit of
Mr. W. Blair Waltrip, 1,072,224 shares held in trusts under
which Mr. W. Blair Waltrip, his brother and his sister are
trustees and have shared voting and investment power and for
which Mr. W. Blair Waltrip disclaims 2/3 beneficial
ownership. Also includes 105,357 shares held by other family
members or trusts, of which shares Mr. W. Blair Waltrip
disclaims beneficial ownership. Of the shares attributable to
the trusts, 468,384 shares are also included in the shares owned
by Mr. R. L. Waltrip. See Footnote (1). Also includes
90,000 shares held by a charitable foundation of which
Mr. Waltrip is President. |
134
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
At the date of his resignation as an officer and director on
February 9, 2005, Mr. B. D. Hunter had an employment
agreement with SCI. In connection with the resignation, SCI
subsidiaries, Mr. Hunter and a company of which
Mr. Hunter is a principal (the Hunter company) agreed,
among other things, that (i) his employment agreement was
terminated, (ii) his stock options would continue in
accordance with their terms, (iii) his restricted stock
grant became vested in accordance with its terms, (iv) his
units under SCIs 2003 and 2004 performance unit plans
became vested on a pro rata basis in accordance with their
terms, and (v) he remained a participant in SCI cash bonus
incentive plan for 2004. In addition, it was agreed, among other
things, that the Hunter company will provide
Mr. Hunters consulting services for a five year term
during which the Hunter company will be paid $91,667 per
month during the first thirty-six months and $50,000 per
month during the remaining twenty-four months. In the last
twenty-four month period, Mr. Hunter is not required to
devote more than 20 hours per week performing consulting
services. The consulting period may be extended up to three
additional one-year periods at the option of SCI. During the
consulting period, Mr. Hunter and the Hunter company are
subject to non-competition obligations. Mr. Hunter will be
reimbursed for all reasonable expenses in connection with his
consulting services.
In April 2006, SCI paid Harris E. Loring, III, Vice
President and Treasurer, $381,000 in consideration of the
cancellation of his stock option to acquire 100,000 shares
of SCI Common Stock at an exercise price of $4.40 per
share. SCI granted the option to Mr. Loring in April 2001.
For 2005, SCI paid $123,355 in compensation to Mr. Kevin
Mack in his capacity as an employee of SCI. Mr. Mack is the
brother of Mr. Stephen M. Mack, Senior Vice President
Middle Market Operations of SCI.
For 2005, SCI paid $142,555 in compensation to Mr. David
Warren in his capacity as an employee of SCI. Mr. Warren is
the stepson of Dr. Edward E. Williams, a director of SCI.
Mr. Warren ceased being an employee of SCI effective in
April 2006.
At the date of his resignation as Executive Vice President of
SCI on January 18, 2000, Mr. W. Blair Waltrip had a
three year employment agreement with SCI. In connection with the
resignation, SCI modified Mr. W. Blair Waltrips
employment agreement and agreed to provide Mr. W. Blair
Waltrip, among other things, continuation of his SCI stock
options in accordance with their terms. In connection with the
modification of the employment agreement, SCI elected to enforce
Mr. W. Blair Waltrips post-employment non-competition
obligations for the period from January 1, 2003 until
December 31, 2005, during which SCI made non-competition
payments of $475,000 per year. Pursuant to the foregoing,
SCI paid to Mr. W. Blair Waltrip his final non-competition
payments of $475,000 for 2005. Additionally, Mr. W. Blair
Waltrip receives remuneration as a director of SCI. Mr. W.
Blair Waltrip is the son of SCIs founder, R. L. Waltrip.
In 1996, the family of Mr. Sumner James Waring, III,
Senior Vice President Major Market Operations, sold its business
to SCI. In the transaction, Mr. Warings father
entered a noncompetition agreement under which SCI pays him
$100,000 per year for ten years. Mr. Warings
father also has a Consulting Agreement expiring in 2006 under
which SCI paid him fees (and an automobile allowance) of $88,500
for 2005. In addition, Mr. Warings father and mother
own a company that leases an office building to SCI under a
lease expiring in 2006 and providing for rent of $65,500 in 2005
and $65,400 in 2006. Mr. Warings father and mother
also own a company that leases funeral homes to SCI under a
lease expiring in 2016, for which SCI paid rent of $200,000 in
2005.
135
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, Inc.
(BHMS) is a holder of more than 5% of the
outstanding shares of SCI Common Stock. During 2005, BHMS was
one of the investment managers of portfolios of independent
trusts which hold funds collected from consumers in connection
with preneed funeral sales and preneed cemetery sales. During
2005, BHMS managed on average approximately $161,180,000 for
such trusts and was managing approximately $188,869,000 at the
end of 2005. Such trusts are prohibited from investing in SCI
stock or other SCI securities. For such services, the trusts
paid fees of $383,596 to BHMS for 2005. It is expected that BHMS
will continue to act as an investment manager for such trusts
during 2006.
In 2005, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
(MMC) was a holder of more than 5% of the
outstanding shares of Common Stock of SCI. In 2005, Marsh Inc.,
a subsidiary of MMC, acted as agent for SCI in its purchase of
aviation insurance at a gross premium of $151,795, from which
MMC received a commission of $22,796. Further in 2005, SCI paid
$71,727 to a subsidiary of MMC for quality assurance software
and support.
136
THE EXCHANGE OFFER
Exchange Terms
Old Notes in an aggregate principal amount of $300,000,000 are
currently issued and outstanding. The maximum aggregate
principal amount of New Notes that will be issued in exchange
for Old Notes is $300,000,000. The terms of the New Notes and
the Old Notes are substantially the same in all material
respects, except that the New Notes will not contain terms with
respect to transfer restrictions, registration rights and
payments of additional interest.
The New Notes will bear interest at a rate of 7.0% per
year, payable semi-annually on June 15 and December 15
of each year, beginning on December 15, 2006. Holders of
New Notes will receive interest from the date of the original
issuance of the Old Notes or from the date of the last payment
of interest on the Old Notes, whichever is later. Holders of New
Notes will not receive any interest on Old Notes tendered and
accepted for exchange. In order to exchange your Old Notes for
New Notes in the exchange offer, you will be required to make
the following representations, which are included in the letter
of transmittal:
|
|
|
|
|
the New Notes that you receive will be acquired in the ordinary
course of your business; |
|
|
|
you are not participating, and have no arrangement or
understanding with any person or entity to participate, in the
distribution of the New Notes; and |
|
|
|
you are not our affiliate, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act, or a broker-dealer
tendering Old Notes acquired directly from us for resale
pursuant to Rule 144A or any other available exemption
under the Securities Act; and |
|
|
|
if you are not a broker-dealer, that you are not engaged in and
do not intend to engage in the distribution of the
New Notes. |
Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this
prospectus and in the letter of transmittal, we will accept for
exchange any Old Notes properly tendered in the exchange offer,
and the exchange agent will deliver the New Notes promptly after
the expiration date of the exchange offer.
If you tender your Old Notes, you will not be required to pay
brokerage commissions or fees or, subject to the instructions in
the letter of transmittal, transfer taxes with respect to the
exchange of the Old Notes in connection with the exchange offer.
We will pay all charges, expenses and transfer taxes in
connection with the exchange offer, other than the taxes
described below under
Transfer Taxes.
We make no recommendation to you as to whether you should
tender or refrain from tendering all or any portion of your
existing Old Notes into this exchange offer. In addition, no one
has been authorized to make this recommendation. You must make
your own decision whether to tender into this exchange offer
and, if so, the aggregate amount of Old Notes to tender after
reading this prospectus and the letter of transmittal and
consulting with your advisors, if any, based on your financial
position and requirements.
Expiration Date; Extensions; Termination; Amendments
The exchange offer expires at 5:00 p.m., New York City
time, on November 20, 2006, unless we extend the exchange
offer, in which case the expiration date will be the latest date
and time to which we extend the exchange offer.
We expressly reserve the right, so long as applicable law allows:
|
|
|
|
|
to delay our acceptance of Old Notes for exchange; |
|
|
|
to terminate the exchange offer if any of the conditions set
forth under Conditions of the Exchange
Offer exist; |
|
|
|
to waive any condition to the exchange offer; |
137
|
|
|
|
|
to amend any of the terms of the exchange offer; and |
|
|
|
to extend the expiration date and retain all Old Notes tendered
in the exchange offer, subject to your right to withdraw your
tendered Old Notes as described under
Withdrawal of Tenders. |
Any waiver or amendment to the exchange offer will apply to all
Old Notes tendered, regardless of when or in what order the Old
Notes were tendered. If the exchange offer is amended in a
manner that we think constitutes a material change, or if we
waive a material condition of the exchange offer, we will
promptly disclose the amendment or waiver by means of a
prospectus supplement that will be distributed to the registered
holders of the Old Notes, and we will extend the exchange offer
to the extent required by
Rule 14e-1 under
the Exchange Act.
We will promptly follow any delay in acceptance, termination,
extension or amendment by oral or written notice of the event to
the exchange agent, followed promptly by oral or written notice
to the registered holders. Should we choose to delay, extend,
amend or terminate the exchange offer, we will have no
obligation to publish, advertise or otherwise communicate this
announcement, other than by making a timely release to an
appropriate news agency.
In the event we terminate the exchange offer, all Old Notes
previously tendered and not accepted for payment will be
returned promptly to the tendering holders.
In the event that the exchange offer is withdrawn or otherwise
not completed, New Notes will not be given to holders of Old
Notes who have validly tendered their Old Notes.
Resale of New Notes
Based on interpretations of the Commission staff set forth in no
action letters issued to third parties, we believe that New
Notes issued under the exchange offer in exchange for Old Notes
may be offered for resale, resold and otherwise transferred by
you without compliance with the registration and prospectus
delivery requirements of the Securities Act, if:
|
|
|
|
|
you are acquiring New Notes in the ordinary course of your
business; |
|
|
|
you are not participating, and have no arrangement or
understanding with any person or entity to participate, in the
distribution of the New Notes; and |
|
|
|
you are not our affiliate within the meaning of
Rule 405 under the Securities Act; and |
|
|
|
you are not a broker-dealer who purchased Old Notes directly
from us for resale pursuant to Rule 144A or any other
available exemption under the Securities Act. |
If you tender Old Notes in the exchange offer with the intention
of participating in any manner in a distribution of the
New Notes:
|
|
|
|
|
you cannot rely on those interpretations by the Commission
staff, and |
|
|
|
you must comply with the registration and prospectus delivery
requirements of the Securities Act in connection with a
secondary resale transaction and such a secondary resale
transaction must be covered by an effective registration
statement containing the selling security holder information
required by Item 507 or 508, as applicable, of
Regulation S-K. |
Only broker-dealers that acquired the Old Notes as a result of
market-making activities or other trading activities may
participate in the exchange offer. Each broker-dealer that
receives New Notes for its own account in exchange for Old
Notes, where such Old Notes were acquired by such broker-dealer
as a result of market-making activities or other trading
activities, must acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus
in connection with any resale of the New Notes. Please read the
section captioned Plan of Distribution for more
details regarding the transfer of New Notes.
138
Acceptance of Old Notes for Exchange
We will accept for exchange Old Notes validly tendered pursuant
to the exchange offer, or defectively tendered, if such defect
has been waived by us. We will not accept Old Notes for exchange
subsequent to the expiration date of the exchange offer. Tenders
of Old Notes will be accepted only in denominations
of $1,000 and integral multiples thereof.
We expressly reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to:
|
|
|
|
|
delay acceptance for exchange of Old Notes tendered under the
exchange offer, subject to
Rule 14e-1 under
the Exchange Act, which requires that an offeror pay the
consideration offered or return the securities deposited by or
on behalf of the holders promptly after the termination or
withdrawal of a tender offer, or |
|
|
|
terminate the exchange offer and not accept for exchange any Old
Notes not theretofore accepted for exchange, if any of the
conditions set forth below under Conditions of
the Exchange Offer have not been satisfied or waived by us
or in order to comply in whole or in part with any applicable
law. In all cases, New Notes will be issued only after timely
receipt by the exchange agent of certificates representing Old
Notes, or confirmation of book-entry transfer, a properly
completed and duly executed letter of transmittal, or a manually
signed facsimile thereof, and any other required documents. For
purposes of the exchange offer, we will be deemed to have
accepted for exchange validly tendered Old Notes, or defectively
tendered Old Notes with respect to which we have waived such
defect, if, as and when we give oral, confirmed in writing, or
written notice to the exchange agent. Promptly after the
expiration date, we will deposit the New Notes with the exchange
agent, who will act as agent for the tendering holders for the
purpose of receiving the New Notes and transmitting them to the
holders. The exchange agent will deliver the New Notes to
holders of Old Notes accepted for exchange after the exchange
agent receives the New Notes. |
If, for any reason, we delay acceptance for exchange of validly
tendered Old Notes or we are unable to accept for exchange
validly tendered Old Notes, then the exchange agent may,
nevertheless, on our behalf, retain tendered Old Notes, without
prejudice to our rights described under
Expiration Date; Extensions; Termination;
Amendments, Conditions of the Exchange
Offer and Withdrawal of Tenders,
subject to
Rule 14e-1 under
the Exchange Act, which requires that an offeror pay the
consideration offered or return the securities deposited by or
on behalf of the holders thereof promptly after the termination
or withdrawal of a tender offer.
If any tendered Old Notes are not accepted for exchange for any
reason, or if certificates are submitted evidencing more Old
Notes than those that are tendered, certificates evidencing Old
Notes that are not exchanged will be returned, without expense,
to the tendering holder, or, in the case of Old Notes tendered
by book-entry transfer into the exchange agents account at
a book-entry transfer facility under the procedure set forth
under Procedures for Tendering Old
Notes Book-Entry Transfer, such Old Notes will
be credited to the account maintained at such book-entry
transfer facility from which such Old Notes were delivered,
unless otherwise requested by such holder under Special
Delivery Instructions in the letter of transmittal,
promptly following the expiration date or the termination of the
exchange offer.
Tendering holders of Old Notes exchanged in the exchange offer
will not be obligated to pay brokerage commissions or transfer
taxes with respect to the exchange of their Old Notes other than
as described in Transfer Taxes or in
Instruction 7 to the letter of transmittal. We will pay all
other charges and expenses in connection with the exchange offer.
Procedures for Tendering Old Notes
Any beneficial owner whose Old Notes are registered in the name
of a broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other
nominee or held through a book-entry transfer facility and who
wishes to tender Old Notes should contact such registered holder
promptly and instruct such registered holder to tender Old Notes
on such beneficial owners behalf.
139
|
|
|
Tender of Old Notes Held Through Depository Trust
Company |
The exchange agent and Depository Trust Company (DTC) have
confirmed that the exchange offer is eligible for the DTCs
automated tender offer program. Accordingly, DTC participants
may electronically transmit their acceptance of the exchange
offer by causing DTC to transfer Old Notes to the exchange agent
in accordance with DTCs automated tender offer program
procedures for transfer. DTC will then send an agents
message to the exchange agent.
The term agents message means a message
transmitted by DTC, received by the exchange agent and forming
part of the book-entry confirmation, which states that DTC has
received an express acknowledgment from the participant in DTC
tendering Old Notes that are the subject of that book-entry
confirmation that the participant has received and agrees to be
bound by the terms of the letter of transmittal, and that we may
enforce such agreement against such participant. In the case of
an agents message relating to guaranteed delivery, the
term means a message transmitted by DTC and received by the
exchange agent which states that DTC has received an express
acknowledgment from the participant in DTC tendering Old Notes
that they have received and agree to be bound by the notice of
guaranteed delivery.
|
|
|
Tender of Old Notes Held in Certificated Form |
For a holder to validly tender Old Notes held in certificated
form:
|
|
|
|
|
the exchange agent must receive at its address set forth in this
prospectus a properly completed and validly executed letter of
transmittal, or a manually signed facsimile thereof, together
with any signature guarantees and any other documents required
by the instructions to the letter of transmittal, and |
|
|
|
the exchange agent must receive certificates for tendered Old
Notes at such address, or such Old Notes must be transferred
pursuant to the procedures for book-entry transfer described
below. A confirmation of such book-entry transfer must be
received by the exchange agent prior to the expiration date of
the exchange offer. A holder who desires to tender Old Notes and
who cannot comply with the procedures set forth herein for
tender on a timely basis or whose Old Notes are not immediately
available must comply with the procedures for guaranteed
delivery set forth below. |
Letters of Transmittal and Old Notes should be sent only to
the exchange agent, and not to us or to DTC.
The method of delivery of Old Notes, Letters of Transmittal
and all other required documents to the exchange agent is at the
election and risk of the holder tendering Old Notes. Delivery of
such documents will be deemed made only when actually received
by the exchange agent. If such delivery is by mail, we suggest
that the holder use property insured, registered mail with
return receipt requested, and that the mailing be made
sufficiently in advance of the expiration date of the exchange
offer to permit delivery to the exchange agent prior to such
date. No alternative, conditional or contingent tenders of Old
Notes will be accepted.
Signatures on the letter of transmittal must be guaranteed by an
eligible institution unless:
|
|
|
|
|
the letter of transmittal is signed by the registered holder of
the Old Notes tendered therewith, or by a participant in one of
the book-entry transfer facilities whose name appears on a
security position listing it as the owner of those Old Notes, or
if any Old Notes for principal amounts not tendered are to be
issued directly to the holder, or, if tendered by a participant
in one of the book-entry transfer facilities, any Old Notes for
principal amounts not tendered or not accepted for exchange are
to be credited to the participants account at the
book-entry transfer facility, and neither the Special
Issuance Instructions nor the Special Delivery
Instructions box on the letter of transmittal has been
completed, or |
|
|
|
the Old Notes are tendered for the account of an eligible
institution. |
140
An eligible institution is a firm that is a member of a
registered national securities exchange or of the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., a commercial bank or a
trust company having an office or correspondent in the United
States or an eligible guarantor institution within
the meaning of
Rule 17Ad-15 under
the Exchange Act.
The exchange agent will seek to establish a new account or
utilize an existing account with respect to the Old Notes at DTC
promptly after the date of this prospectus. Any financial
institution that is a participant in the DTC system and whose
name appears on a security position listing as the owner of the
Old Notes may make book-entry delivery of Old Notes by causing
DTC to transfer such Old Notes into the exchange agents
account. However, although delivery of Old Notes may be
effected through book-entry transfer into the exchange
agents account at DTC, a properly completed and validly
executed Letter of Transmittal, or a manually signed facsimile
thereof, must be received by the exchange agent at one of its
addresses set forth in this prospectus on or prior to the
expiration date of the exchange offer, or else the guaranteed
delivery procedures described below must be complied with.
The confirmation of a book-entry transfer of Old Notes into the
exchange agents account at DTC is referred to in this
prospectus as a book-entry confirmation. Delivery of
documents to DTC in accordance with DTCs procedures does
not constitute delivery to the exchange agent.
If you wish to tender your Old Notes and:
|
|
|
(1) certificates representing your Old Notes are not lost
but are not immediately available, |
|
|
(2) time will not permit your letter of transmittal,
certificates representing your Old Notes and all other required
documents to reach the exchange agent on or prior to the
expiration date of the exchange offer, or |
|
|
(3) the procedures for book-entry transfer cannot be
completed on or prior to the expiration date of the exchange
offer, you may nevertheless tender if all of the following
conditions are complied with: |
|
|
|
|
|
your tender is made by or through an eligible institution; and |
|
|
|
on or prior to the expiration date of the exchange offer, the
exchange agent has received from the eligible institution a
properly completed and validly executed notice of guaranteed
delivery, by manually signed facsimile transmission, mail or
hand delivery, in substantially the form provided with this
prospectus. The notice of guaranteed delivery must: |
|
|
|
(a) set forth your name and address, the registered
number(s) of your Old Notes and the principal amount of Old
Notes tendered; |
|
|
(b) state that the tender is being made thereby; |
|
|
(c) guarantee that, within three New York Stock Exchange
trading days after the expiration date, the letter of
transmittal or facsimile thereof properly completed and validly
executed, together with certificates representing the Old Notes,
or a book-entry confirmation, and any other documents required
by the letter of transmittal and the instructions thereto, will
be deposited by the eligible institution with the exchange
agent; and |
|
|
(d) the exchange agent receives the properly completed and
validly executed letter of transmittal or facsimile thereof with
any required signature guarantees, together with certificates
for all Old Notes in proper form for transfer, or a book-entry
confirmation, and any other required documents, within three New
York Stock Exchange trading days after the expiration date. |
141
New Notes will be issued in exchange for Old Notes accepted for
exchange only after timely receipt by the exchange agent of:
|
|
|
|
|
certificates for (or a timely book-entry confirmation with
respect to) your Old Notes, |
|
|
|
a properly completed and duly executed letter of transmittal or
facsimile thereof with any required signature guarantees, or, in
the case of a book-entry transfer, an agents
message, and |
|
|
|
any other documents required by the letter of transmittal. |
We will determine, in our sole discretion, all questions as to
the form of all documents, validity, eligibility, including time
of receipt, and acceptance of all tenders of Old Notes. Our
determination will be final and binding on all parties.
Alternative, conditional or contingent tenders of Old Notes
will not be considered valid. We reserve the absolute right to
reject any or all tenders of Old Notes that are not in proper
form or the acceptance of which, in our opinion, would be
unlawful. We also reserve the right to waive any defects,
irregularities or conditions of tender as to particular Old
Notes.
Our interpretation of the terms and conditions of the exchange
offer, including the instructions in the letter of transmittal,
will be final and binding.
Any defect or irregularity in connection with tenders of Old
Notes must be cured within the time we determine, unless waived
by us. We will not consider the tender of Old Notes to have been
validly made until all defects and irregularities have been
waived by us or cured. Neither we, the exchange agent, or any
other person will be under any duty to give notice of any
defects or irregularities in tenders of Old Notes, or will incur
any liability to holders for failure to give any such notice.
Withdrawal of Tenders
Except as otherwise provided in this prospectus, you may
withdraw your tender of Old Notes at any time prior to the
expiration date.
For a withdrawal to be effective:
|
|
|
|
|
the exchange agent must receive a written notice of withdrawal
at the address set forth on the inside of the back cover of this
prospectus, or |
|
|
|
you must comply with the appropriate procedures of DTCs
automated tender offer program system. |
Any notice of withdrawal must:
|
|
|
|
|
specify the name of the person who tendered the Old Notes to be
withdrawn, and |
|
|
|
identify the Old Notes to be withdrawn, including the principal
amount of the Old Notes. |
If Old Notes have been tendered pursuant to the procedure for
book-entry transfer described above, any notice of withdrawal
must specify the name and number of the account at DTC to be
credited with the withdrawn Old Notes and otherwise comply with
the procedures of DTC.
We will determine all questions as to validity, form,
eligibility and time of receipt of any withdrawal notices. Our
determination will be final and binding on all parties. We will
deem any Old Notes so withdrawn not to have been validly
tendered for exchange for purposes of the exchange offer.
Any Old Notes that have been tendered for exchange but that are
not exchanged for any reason will be returned to their holder
without cost to the holder or, in the case of Old Notes tendered
by book-entry transfer into the exchange agents account at
DTC according to the procedures described above, such Old Notes
will be credited to an account maintained with DTC for the Old
Notes. This return or crediting will take place promptly after
withdrawal, rejection of tender or termination of the exchange
offer. You may
142
retender properly withdrawn Old Notes by following one of the
procedures described under Procedures for
Tendering Old Notes at any time on or prior to the
expiration date.
Conditions of the Exchange Offer
Notwithstanding any other provisions of the exchange offer, if,
on or prior to the expiration date, we determine, in our
reasonable judgment, that the exchange offer, or the making of
an exchange by a holder of Old Notes, would violate applicable
law or any applicable interpretation of the staff of the
Commission, we will not be required to accept for exchange, or
to exchange, any tendered Old Notes. We may also terminate,
waive any conditions to or amend the exchange offer or, subject
to Rule 14e-1
under the Exchange Act, which requires that an offeror pay the
consideration offered or return the securities deposited by or
on behalf of the holders thereof promptly after the termination
or withdrawal of the exchange offer, postpone the acceptance for
exchange of tendered Old Notes.
Transfer Taxes
We will pay all transfer taxes applicable to the transfer and
exchange of Old Notes pursuant to the exchange offer. If,
however:
|
|
|
|
|
delivery of the New Notes and/or certificates for Old Notes for
principal amounts not exchanged, are to be made to any person
other than the record holder of the Old Notes tendered; |
|
|
|
tendered certificates for Old Notes are recorded in the name of
any person other than the person signing any letter of
transmittal; or |
|
|
|
a transfer tax is imposed for any reason other than the transfer
and exchange of Old Notes to us or our order, |
the amount of any such transfer taxes, whether imposed on the
record holder or any other person, will be payable by the
tendering holder prior to the issuance of the New Notes.
Consequences of Failing to Exchange
If you do not exchange your Old Notes for New Notes in the
exchange offer, you will remain subject to the restrictions on
transfer of the Old Notes:
|
|
|
|
|
as set forth in the legend printed on the Old Notes as a
consequence of the issuance of the Old Notes pursuant to the
exemptions from, or in transactions not subject to, the
registration requirements of the Securities Act and applicable
state securities laws; and |
|
|
|
otherwise set forth in the offering circular distributed in
connection with the private offering of the Old Notes. |
In general, you may not offer or sell the Old Notes unless they
are registered under the Securities Act, or if the offer or sale
is exempt from registration under the Securities Act and
applicable state securities laws. Except as required by the
registration rights agreement, we do not intend to register
resales of the Old Notes under the Securities Act.
Accounting Treatment
The New Notes will be recorded at the same carrying value as the
Old Notes, as reflected in our accounting records on the date of
the exchange. Accordingly, we will not recognize any gain or
loss for accounting purposes upon the consummation of the
exchange offer. We will amortize the expenses of the exchange
offer over the term of the New Notes.
143
Exchange Agent
Global Bondholder Services Corporation has been appointed as
exchange agent for the exchange offer. You should direct
questions and requests for assistance, requests for additional
copies of this prospectus, the letter of transmittal or any
other documents to the exchange agent. You should send
certificates for Old Notes, letters of transmittal and any other
required documents to the exchange agent at the address set
forth on the inside of the back cover of this prospectus.
Information Agent
Global Bondholder Services Corporation has been appointed as the
information agent for the exchange offer and will receive
customary compensation for its services. Questions concerning
tender procedures and requests for additional copies of this
prospectus or the letter of transmittal should be directed to
the information agent at the address and telephone number set
forth on the inside of the back cover of this prospectus.
Holders of Old Notes may also contact their commercial bank,
broker, dealer, trust company or other nominee for assistance
concerning the exchange offer.
144
DESCRIPTION OF THE NOTES
The New Notes will be issued, and the Old Notes were issued,
under an indenture dated February 1, 1993 between us and
The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as successor trustee
to The Bank of New York, as supplemented through June 15,
2005. The terms of the notes include those stated in the
indenture and made a part thereof by reference to the Trust
Indenture Act of 1939, as amended, in effect on the date of the
indenture. This summary of the material terms of the New Notes
and the indenture does not purport to be complete and is subject
to, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, the
indenture, including the definitions of certain terms therein,
and the Trust Indenture Act. Global Bondholder Services
Corporation, the information agent for the exchange offer, will
provide a copy of the indenture governing the New Notes, at no
cost, to any holder who receives this prospectus. To request a
copy of this document, you should telephone Global Bondholder
Services Corporation at the telephone number on the inside of
the back cover of this prospectus. We have included at the end
of this section a summary of capitalized terms used in this
section. Terms used in this section and not otherwise defined in
this section have the respective meanings assigned to them in
the indenture.
In this description, references to SCI,
we, us, and ours mean only
Service Corporation International and not any of our
subsidiaries.
General
The notes:
|
|
|
|
|
are our general unsecured obligations; |
|
|
|
rank equally in right of payment with all of our other unsecured
and unsubordinated indebtedness; and |
|
|
|
are senior in right or payment to all of our subordinated
indebtedness. |
The notes are unsecured and will be effectively subordinated to
all of our existing and future secured indebtedness to the
extent of the collateral securing such indebtedness and to all
indebtedness and other obligations of our subsidiaries, whether
or not secured. As of June 30, 2006, after giving pro forma
effect to the transactions, we and our subsidiaries would have
had approximately $1,734 million of indebtedness (excluding
the notes being offered by this prospectus and letter of credit
obligations), of which approximately $122 million
represents our senior secured indebtedness and the balance of
which represents our senior unsecured indebtedness. As of
June 30, 2006, after giving pro forma effect to the
transactions, our subsidiaries would have had approximately
$1,256 million of total indebtedness and other liabilities
outstanding, including trade payables and excluding guarantees
of our new senior credit facility and our privately placed debt
securities, intercompany obligations and deferred revenues. The
indenture governing the notes does not limit our ability to
incur additional indebtedness. Although covenants under the
credit agreement governing our new senior credit facility and
under the privately placed debt securities will limit our
ability and the ability of our present and future subsidiaries
to incur certain additional indebtedness, the terms of the
credit agreement and those debt securities will permit us to
incur significant additional indebtedness, including unused
availability under our new senior credit facility.
Maturity and Interest
The notes will mature on June 15, 2017. Interest on the
notes will:
|
|
|
|
|
accrue at a rate of 7.0% per year; |
|
|
|
be payable semi-annually on June 15 and December 15 of
each year, commencing December 15, 2005; |
|
|
|
be payable to the persons in whose names the notes are
registered at the close of business on the June 1 or
December 1 preceding the applicable interest payment date; |
145
|
|
|
|
|
accrue from the date of original issuance or, if interest has
already been paid, from the date it was most recently paid |
|
|
|
be computed on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve
30-day months. |
If we fail to comply with our obligations to file and maintain a
registration statement in accordance with the registration
rights agreement described under Exchange Offer and
Registration Rights, additional interest will accrue on
the notes. All references in this registration statement to
interest are deemed to include any such additional
interest, unless the context indicates otherwise.
If any interest payment date, maturity date or redemption date
falls on a day that is not a business day, the payment will be
made on the next business day (and without any interest or other
payment in respect of such delay) with the same force and effect
as if made on the relevant interest payment date, maturity date
or redemption date. Unless we default on a payment, no interest
will accrue for the period from and after the applicable
maturity date or redemption date.
Optional Redemption
The notes will be redeemable, in whole or in part, at our option
at any time, upon at least 30 days and not more than
60 days notice to the holders, at a redemption price
equal to the greater of:
|
|
|
(1) 100% of the principal amount of such notes; and |
|
|
(2) as determined by the Quotation Agent, the sum of the
present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal
and interest thereon (not including any portion of such payments
of interest accrued as of the date of redemption) discounted to
the date of redemption on a semi-annual basis (assuming a
360-day year consisting
of twelve 30-day
months) at the Adjusted Treasury Rate plus 50 basis points |
plus, in each case, accrued interest thereon to the date of
redemption.
Selection
If we redeem less than all of the notes at any time, the trustee
will select or cause to be selected the notes to be redeemed by
any method that it deems fair and appropriate. In the event of a
partial redemption, the trustee may provide for selection for
redemption of portions of the principal amount of any note of a
denomination larger than $1,000.
Covenants
Neither we, nor any subsidiary, may mortgage, pledge, encumber
or subject to any lien or security interest to secure any of our
indebtedness or any indebtedness of any subsidiary (other than
indebtedness owing to us or a wholly-owned subsidiary) any
assets without providing that the senior debt securities issued
pursuant to the indenture shall be secured equally and ratably
with (or prior to) any other indebtedness so secured, unless,
after giving effect thereto, the aggregate outstanding amount of
all such secured indebtedness of us and our subsidiaries
(excluding secured indebtedness existing as of March 31,
2005 and any extensions, renewals or refundings thereof that do
not increase the principal amount of indebtedness so extended,
renewed or refunded and excluding secured indebtedness incurred
as set forth in the next paragraph), together with all
outstanding Attributable Indebtedness from sale and leaseback
transactions described in the first bullet point under
Limitation on Sale and Leaseback
Transactions below, would not exceed 10% of Adjusted
Consolidated Net Tangible Assets of us and our subsidiaries on
the date such indebtedness is so secured.
This restriction will not prevent us or any subsidiary:
|
|
|
|
|
from acquiring and retaining property subject to mortgages,
pledges, encumbrances, liens or security interests existing
thereon at the date of acquisition thereof, or from creating
within one year of such acquisition mortgages, pledges,
encumbrances or liens upon property acquired by us or any |
146
|
|
|
|
|
subsidiary after March 31, 2005, as security for purchase
money obligations incurred by us or any subsidiary in connection
with the acquisition of such property, whether payable to the
person from whom such property is acquired or otherwise; |
|
|
|
from mortgaging, pledging, encumbering or subjecting to any lien
or security interest current assets to secure current
liabilities; |
|
|
|
from mortgaging, pledging, encumbering or subjecting to any lien
or security interest property to secure indebtedness under one
or more Credit Facilities in an aggregate principal amount not
to exceed $500 million; |
|
|
|
from extending, renewing or refunding any indebtedness secured
by a mortgage, pledge, encumbrance, lien or security interest on
the same property theretofore subject thereto, provided that the
principal amount of such indebtedness so extended, renewed or
refunded shall not be increased; or |
|
|
|
from securing the payment of workmens compensation or
insurance premiums or from making good faith pledges or deposits
in connection with bids, tenders, contracts (other than
contracts for the payment of money) or leases, deposits to
secure public or statutory obligations, deposits to secure
surety or appeal bonds, pledges or deposits in connection with
contracts made with or at the request of the United States
government or any agency thereof, or pledges or deposits for
similar purposes in the ordinary course of business. |
|
|
|
Limitation on Sale and Leaseback Transactions |
The indenture provides that neither we nor any subsidiary will
enter into any transaction with any bank, insurance company or
other lender or investor, or to which any such lender or
investor is a party, providing for the leasing to us or a
subsidiary of any real property (except a lease for a temporary
period not to exceed three years by the end of which it is
intended that the use of such real property by the lessee will
be discontinued) which has been or is to be sold or transferred
by us or such subsidiary to such lender or investor or to any
person to whom funds have been or are to be advanced by such
lender or investor on the security of such real property unless
either:
|
|
|
|
|
such transaction is the substantial equivalent of a mortgage,
pledge, encumbrance, lien or security interest which we or any
subsidiary would have been permitted to create under the
covenant described in Limitation on
Liens without equally and ratably securing all senior debt
securities (including the notes) then outstanding under the
indenture; or |
|
|
|
within 120 days after such transaction we applied (and in
any such case we covenant that we will so apply) an amount equal
to the greater of |
|
|
|
|
|
the net proceeds of the sale of the real property leased
pursuant to such transaction or |
|
|
|
the fair value of the real property so leased at the time of
entering into such transaction (as determined by our board of
directors) |
to the retirement of Funded Debt of SCI; provided that the
amount to be applied to the retirement of Funded Debt of SCI
shall be reduced by: (1) the principal amount of any senior
debt securities outstanding under the indenture delivered within
120 days after such sale to the trustee for retirement and
cancellation and (2) the principal amount of Funded Debt,
other than senior debt securities outstanding under the
indenture, voluntarily retired by us within 120 days after
such sale; provided, that no retirement referred to in this
clause (2) may be effected by payment at maturity or
pursuant to any mandatory sinking fund payment or any mandatory
prepayment provision.
147
Reports
Whether or not required by the Commission, so long as any notes
are outstanding, we will furnish to the trustee and to any
holders of the notes who so request, within 15 days of the
time periods specified in the Commissions rules and
regulations:
|
|
|
(1) all quarterly and annual financial information that
would be required to be contained in a filing with the
Commission on Forms 10-Q and 10-K if we were required to
file such Forms, including a Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and, with respect to the annual information
only, a report on the annual financial statements by our
independent accountants; and |
|
|
(2) all current reports that would be required to be filed
with the Commission on Form 8-K if we were required to file
such reports. |
In addition, whether or not required by the Commission, we will
file a copy of all of the information and reports referred to in
clauses (1) and (2) above with the Commission for
public availability within the time periods specified in the
Commissions rules and regulations (unless the Commission
will not accept such a filing) and make such information
available to securities analysts and prospective investors upon
request. In addition, for so long as any notes remain
outstanding, we will furnish to the holders and to prospective
investors, upon their request, the information required to be
delivered pursuant to Rule 144A(d)(4) under the Securities
Act of 1933.
Consolidation, Merger or Sale
We may consolidate or merge with or into any other corporation,
and may sell, lease, exchange or otherwise dispose of all or
substantially all of our property and assets to any other
corporation authorized to acquire and operate the same, provided
that in any such case
|
|
|
|
|
immediately after such transaction we or such other corporation
formed by or surviving any such consolidation or merger, or to
which such sale, lease, exchange or other disposition shall have
been made, will not be in default in the performance or
observance of any of the terms, covenants and conditions in the
indenture to be kept or performed by us; |
|
|
|
the corporation (if other than SCI) formed by or surviving any
such consolidation or merger, or to which such sale, lease,
exchange or other disposition shall have been made, shall be a
corporation organized under the laws of the United States, any
state thereof or the District of Columbia; and |
|
|
|
the corporation (if other than SCI) formed by such
consolidation, or into which we shall have been merged, or the
corporation which shall have acquired or leased such property
and assets, shall assume, by a supplemental indenture, our
obligations under the indenture. |
In case of any such consolidation, merger, sale, lease, exchange
or other disposition and upon any such assumption by the
successor corporation, such successor corporation shall succeed
to and be substituted for us, with the same effect as if it had
been named in the indenture as SCI, and, except in the case of a
lease, we shall be relieved of any further obligation under the
indenture and any senior debt securities issued thereunder.
Discharge and Defeasance
We may discharge or defease our obligations with respect to the
notes as set forth below.
We may discharge all of our obligations (except those set forth
below) to holders of the notes that have not already been
delivered to the trustee for cancellation and which either have
become due and payable or are by their terms due and payable
within one year (or are to be called for redemption within one
year) by irrevocably depositing with the trustee cash or
U.S. government obligations, or a combination thereof, as
trust funds in an amount certified to be sufficient to pay when
due the principal of, premium, if any, and interest, if any, on
all outstanding notes.
148
We may also discharge at any time all of our obligations (except
those set forth below) to holders of the notes
(defeasance) if, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
we irrevocably deposit with the trustee cash or
U.S. government obligations, or a combination thereof, as
trust funds in an amount certified to be sufficient to pay the
principal of, premium, if any, and interest, if any, on all
outstanding notes when due, and such funds have been so
deposited for 91 days; |
|
|
|
such deposit will not result in a breach or violation of, or
cause a default under, any agreement or instrument to which we
are a party or by which we are bound; and |
|
|
|
we deliver to the trustee an opinion of counsel to the effect
that the holders of the notes will not recognize income, gain or
loss for United States federal income tax purposes as a result
of such defeasance, and that such defeasance will not otherwise
alter the United States federal income tax treatment of
principal, premium, if any, and interest payments on the notes.
Such opinion of counsel must be based on a ruling of the
Internal Revenue Service or a change in United States federal
income tax law, since such a result would not occur under
current tax law. |
In the event of such discharge and defeasance of the notes, the
holders thereof would be entitled to look only to such trust
funds for payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and
interest on the notes.
Notwithstanding the preceding, no discharge or defeasance
described above shall affect the following obligations to or
rights of the holders of such notes:
|
|
|
(1) rights of registration of transfer and exchange of
notes; |
|
|
(2) rights of substitution of mutilated, defaced,
destroyed, lost or stolen notes; |
|
|
(3) rights of holders of notes to receive payments of
principal thereof, premium, if any, and interest thereon when
due from the trust funds held by the trustee; |
|
|
(4) the rights, obligations, duties and immunities of the
trustee; |
|
|
(5) the rights of holders of notes as beneficiaries with
respect to property deposited with the trustee payable to all or
any of them; and |
|
|
(6) our obligation to maintain an office or agency for
notice, payments and transfers in respect of notes. |
Modification of the Indenture
The indenture provides that SCI and the trustee may enter into
supplemental indentures without the consent of any holders of
senior debt securities outstanding thereunder to:
|
|
|
|
|
evidence the assumption by a successor corporation of our
obligations under the indenture; |
|
|
|
add covenants or make the occurrence and continuance of a
default in such additional covenants a new Event of Default for
the protection of the holders of debt securities; |
|
|
|
cure any ambiguity or correct any inconsistency in the indenture
or amend the indenture in any other manner which we may deem
necessary or desirable and which will not adversely affect the
interests of the holders of senior debt securities issued
thereunder; |
|
|
|
establish the form and terms of any series of senior debt
securities to be issued pursuant to the indenture; |
|
|
|
evidence the acceptance of appointment by a successor trustee; or |
|
|
|
secure the senior debt securities with any property or assets. |
The indenture also contains provisions permitting us and the
trustee, with the consent of the holders of not less than a
majority in aggregate principal amount of the notes then
outstanding, to add any
149
provisions to, or change in any manner or eliminate any of the
provisions of, the indenture or modify in any manner the rights
of the holders of notes; provided that neither we nor the
trustee may, without the consent of the holder of each
outstanding note:
|
|
|
|
|
extend the stated maturity of the principal of the notes, reduce
the principal amount thereof, reduce the rate or extend the time
of payment of any interest thereon, reduce or alter the method
of computation of any amount payable on redemption thereof,
change the coin or currency in which principal, premium, if any,
and interest are payable, or impair or affect the right of any
holder to institute suit for the enforcement of any payment
thereof; or |
|
|
|
reduce the percentage in aggregate principal amount of notes,
the consent of the holders of which is required for any such
modification. |
Events of Default
An Event of Default with respect to the notes is defined as
being any one or more of the following events:
|
|
|
(1) failure to pay any installment of interest on the notes
for 30 days; |
|
|
(2) failure to pay the principal of or premium, if any, on
any of the notes when the due; |
|
|
(3) failure to perform any other of the covenants or
agreements in the notes or in the indenture that continues for a
period of 60 days after being given written notice; |
|
|
(4) if a court having jurisdiction enters a bankruptcy
order or a judgment, order or decree adjudging SCI a bankrupt or
insolvent, or an order for relief for reorganization,
arrangement, adjustment or composition of or in respect of SCI
and the judgment, order or decree remains unstayed and in effect
for a period of 60 consecutive days; |
|
|
(5) if we institute a voluntary case in bankruptcy, or
consent to the institution of bankruptcy or insolvency
proceedings against us, or file a petition seeking, or seek or
consent to, reorganization, arrangement, composition or relief,
or consent to the filing of such petition or to the appointment
of a receiver, custodian, liquidator, assignee, trustee,
sequestrator or similar official of SCI or of substantially all
of our property, or we shall make a general assignment for the
benefit of creditors; or |
|
|
(6) default under any bond, debenture, note or other
evidence of indebtedness for money borrowed by us or any
subsidiary or under any mortgage, indenture or instrument under
which there may be issued or by which there may be secured or
evidenced any indebtedness for money borrowed by us or any
subsidiary (other than non-recourse indebtedness), whether such
indebtedness exists on the date of the indenture or shall
thereafter be created, which default shall have resulted in such
indebtedness becoming or being declared due and payable prior to
the date on which it would otherwise have become due and
payable, or any default in payment of such indebtedness (after
the expiration of any applicable grace periods and the
presentation of any debt instruments, if required), if the
aggregate amount of all such indebtedness which has been so
accelerated and with respect to which there has been such a
default in payment shall exceed $10,000,000, without each such
default and acceleration having been rescinded or annulled
within a period of 30 days after there shall have been
given to us by the trustee by registered mail, or to us and the
trustee by the holders of at least 25 percent in aggregate
principal amount of the notes then outstanding, a written notice
specifying each such default and requiring us to cause each such
default and acceleration to be rescinded or annulled and stating
that such notice is a Notice of Default under the
indenture. |
If an Event of Default with respect to the notes then
outstanding occurs and is continuing, then and in each and every
such case, unless the principal of all of the notes then
outstanding shall have already become due and payable, either
the trustee or the holders of not less than 25 percent in
aggregate principal amount of the notes then outstanding, by
notice in writing to us (and to the trustee if given by holders
of notes), may declare the unpaid principal amount of all notes
then outstanding and the optional redemption premium, if any,
and interest accrued thereon to be due and payable immediately,
and upon
150
any such declaration the same shall become and shall be
immediately due and payable. This provision, however, is subject
to the condition that, if at any time after the unpaid principal
amount of such notes shall have been so declared due and payable
and before any judgment or decree for the payment of the moneys
due shall have been obtained or entered, we shall pay or shall
deposit with the trustee a sum sufficient to pay all matured
installments of interest upon all such notes and the principal
of any and all notes which shall have become due otherwise than
by acceleration (with interest on overdue installments of
interest to the extent that payment of such interest is
enforceable under applicable law and on such principal at the
rate borne by such notes to the date of such payment or deposit)
and the reasonable compensation, disbursements, expenses and
advances of the trustee, and any and all defaults under the
indenture, other than the nonpayment of such portion of the
principal amount of and accrued interest on such notes which
shall have become due by acceleration, shall have been cured or
shall have been waived in accordance with the indenture or
provision deemed by the trustee to be adequate shall have been
made therefor, then and in every such case the holders of a
majority in aggregate principal amount of the notes then
outstanding, by written notice to us and to the trustee, may
rescind and annul such declaration and its consequences; but no
such rescission and annulment shall extend to or shall affect
any subsequent default, or shall impair any right consequent
thereon. If any Event of Default with respect to us specified in
clause (4) or (5) above occurs, the unpaid principal
amount and accrued interest on all notes then outstanding shall
ipso facto become and be immediately due and payable without any
declaration or other act by the trustee or any holder of such
notes.
If the trustee shall have proceeded to enforce any right under
the indenture and such proceedings shall have been discontinued
or abandoned because of such rescission or annulment or for any
other reason or shall have been determined adversely to the
trustee, then and in every such case we, the trustee and the
holders of such notes shall be restored respectively to their
several positions and rights under the indenture, and all
rights, remedies and powers of SCI, the trustee and the holders
of such notes shall continue as though no such proceeding had
been taken. Except with respect to an Event of Default pursuant
to clause (1) or (2) above, the trustee shall not be
charged with knowledge of any Event of Default unless written
notice thereof shall have been given to the trustee by us, a
paying agent or any holder of the notes.
The indenture provides that, subject to the duty of the trustee
during default to act with the required standard of care, the
trustee will be under no obligation to exercise any of its
rights or powers under the indenture at the request or direction
of any of the holders of the notes, unless such holders shall
have offered to the trustee reasonable security or indemnity.
No holder of notes then outstanding shall have any right by
virtue of or by availing of any provision of the indenture to
institute any suit, action or proceeding in equity or at law
upon or under or with respect to the indenture or the notes or
for the appointment of a receiver or trustee or similar
official, or for any other remedy under the indenture or under
the notes, unless such holder previously shall have given to the
trustee written notice of default and of the continuance
thereof, and unless the holders of not less than 25 percent
in aggregate principal amount of notes then outstanding shall
have made written request to the trustee to institute such
action, suit or proceeding in its own name as trustee and shall
have offered to the trustee such reasonable indemnity as it may
require against the costs, expenses and liabilities to be
incurred therein or thereby, and the trustee for 60 days
after its receipt of such notice, request and offer of
indemnity, shall have neglected or refused to institute any such
action, suit or proceeding. Notwithstanding any other provisions
in the indenture, however, the right of any holder of the notes
to receive payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and
interest on such notes, on or after the respective due dates
expressed in such notes, or to institute suit for the
enforcement of any such payment on or after such respective
dates shall not be impaired or affected without the consent of
such holder.
The holders of at least a majority in aggregate principal amount
of notes then outstanding shall have the right to direct the
time, method and place of conducting any proceeding for any
remedy available to the trustee, or exercising any trust or
power conferred on the trustee with respect to the notes;
provided that (subject to certain exceptions) the trustee shall
have the right to decline to follow any such direction if the
trustee shall determine upon advice of counsel that the action
or proceeding so directed may not lawfully be taken or if the
trustee in good faith shall determine that the action or
proceeding so directed
151
would involve the trustee in personal liability. The holders of
662/3%
in aggregate principal amount of the notes then outstanding may
on behalf of the holders of all of such notes waive any past
default or Event of Default and its consequences except a
default in the payment of premium, if any, or interest on, or
the principal of, such notes. Upon any such waiver we, the
trustee and the holders of all notes shall be restored to our
and their former positions and rights under the indenture,
respectively; but no such waiver shall extend to any subsequent
or other default or Event of Default or impair any right
consequent thereon. Whenever any default or Event of Default
shall have been waived as permitted, said default or Event of
Default shall for all purposes of the notes and the indenture be
deemed to have been cured and to be not continuing.
The trustee shall, within 90 days after the occurrence of a
default, with respect to the notes then outstanding, mail to all
holders of such notes, as the names and the addresses of such
holders appear upon the notes register, notice of all defaults
known to the trustee with respect to such notes, unless such
defaults shall have been cured before the giving of such notice
(the term defaults for the purpose of these
provisions being hereby defined to be the events specified in
clauses (1), (2), (3), (4), (5) and (6) above, not
including periods of grace, if any, provided for therein and
irrespective of the giving of the written notice specified in
said clause (3) or (6) but in the case of any default
of the character specified in said clause (3) or
(6) no such notice to holders of notes shall be given until
at least 60 days after the giving of written notice thereof
to us pursuant to said clause (3) or (6), as the case may
be); provided, that, except in the case of default in the
payment of the principal of, premium, if any, or interest on any
of the notes, the trustee shall be protected in withholding such
notice if and so long as the trustee in good faith determines
that the withholding of such notice is in the best interests of
the holders of the notes.
We are required to furnish to the trustee annually a statement
as to the fulfillment by us of all of our obligations under the
indenture.
Governing Law
The indenture and the notes are governed by the laws of the
State of Texas.
Definitions
For all purposes of the indenture and this registration
statement, the following terms shall have the respective
meanings set forth below (except as otherwise expressly provided
or unless the context otherwise clearly requires). All
accounting terms used in the indenture and herein and not
expressly defined shall have the meanings assigned to such terms
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
the term generally accepted accounting principles
means such accounting principles as are generally accepted at
the date of the initial issuance of the notes.
Adjusted Consolidated Net Tangible Assets means, at
the time of determination, the aggregate amount of total assets
included in SCIs most recent quarterly or annual
consolidated balance sheet prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, net of applicable reserves
reflected in such balance sheet, after deducting the following
amounts reflected in such balance sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
goodwill; |
|
|
|
deferred charges and other assets; |
|
|
|
preneed funeral receivables and trust investments; |
|
|
|
preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments; |
|
|
|
cemetery perpetual care trust investments; |
|
|
|
current assets of discontinued operations; |
|
|
|
non-current assets of discontinued operations; |
152
|
|
|
|
|
other like intangibles; and |
|
|
|
current liabilities (excluding, however, current maturities of
long-term debt). |
Adjusted Treasury Rate means, with respect to any
redemption date, the rate per annum equal to the semi-annual
equivalent yield to maturity of the Comparable Treasury Issue,
assuming a price for the Comparable Treasury Issue (expressed as
a percentage of its principal amount) equal to the Comparable
Treasury Price for such redemption date.
Attributable Indebtedness, when used with respect to
any sale and leaseback transaction, means, at the time of
determination, the present value (discounted at the rate set
forth or implicit in the terms of the lease included in such
transaction) of the total obligations of the lessee for rental
payments (other than amounts required to be paid on account of
property taxes, maintenance, repairs, insurance, assessments,
utilities, operating and labor costs and other items that do not
constitute payments for property rights) during the remaining
term of the lease included in such transaction (including any
period for which such lease has been extended). In the case of
any lease that is terminable by the lessee upon the payment of a
penalty or other termination payment, such amount shall be the
lesser of the amount determined assuming termination upon the
first date such lease may be terminated (in which case the
amount shall also include the amount of the penalty or
termination payment, but no rent shall be considered as required
to be paid under such lease subsequent to the first date upon
which it may be so terminated) or the amount determined assuming
no such termination.
Comparable Treasury Issue means the United States
Treasury security selected by the Quotation Agent as having a
maturity comparable to the remaining term of the notes to be
redeemed that would be utilized, at the time of selection and in
accordance with customary financial practice, in pricing new
issues of corporate debt securities of comparable maturity to
the remaining term of such notes.
Comparable Treasury Price means, with respect to any
redemption date, (i) the average of the Reference Treasury
Dealer Quotations for such redemption date, after excluding the
highest and lowest such Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations, or
(ii) if the trustee obtains fewer than three such Reference
Treasury Dealer Quotations, the average of all such Quotations.
Credit Facilities means one or more debt facilities
with banks or other institutional lenders providing for
revolving credit or term loans or letters of credit.
Funded Debt means indebtedness for money borrowed
which by its terms matures at or is extendible or renewable at
the option of the obligor to a date more than 12 months
after the date of the creation of such indebtedness.
Quotation Agent means the Reference Treasury Dealer
appointed by SCI.
Reference Treasury Dealer means each of Merrill
Lynch (and its successors), J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. (and its
successors) and any other nationally recognized investment
banking firm that is a primary U.S. government securities
dealer specified from time to time by SCI.
Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations means, with
respect to each Reference Treasury Dealer and any redemption
date, the average, as determined by SCI, of the bid and asked
prices for the Comparable Treasury Issue (expressed in each case
as a percentage of its principal amount) quoted in writing to
the trustee by such Reference Treasury Dealer as of
5:00 p.m., New York time, on the third business day
preceding the redemption date.
Paying Agent and Registrar for the Notes
The trustee will initially act as paying agent and registrar. We
may change the paying agent or registrar without prior notice to
the holders of the notes, and we may act as paying agent or
registrar.
153
Transfer and Exchange
A holder may transfer or exchange notes in accordance with the
indenture. The registrar and the trustee may require a holder,
among other things, to furnish appropriate endorsements and
transfer documents and we may require a holder to pay any taxes
and fees required by law or permitted by the indenture.
The registered holder of a note will be treated as its owner for
all purposes.
Notices
Notices to holders of the notes will be given by mail to the
addresses of such holders as they appear in the security
register.
No Personal Liability of Officers, Directors or
Stockholders
No director, officer or stockholder, as such, of SCI will have
any personal liability in respect of our obligations under the
indenture or the notes by reason of his, her or its status as
such.
Concerning the Trustee
The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as successor trustee
to The Bank of New York, is the trustee under the indenture.
The indenture contains certain limitations on the right of the
trustee, should it become our creditor, to obtain payment of
claims in certain cases, or to realize for its own account on
certain property received in respect of any such claim as
security or otherwise. The trustee is permitted to engage in
certain other transactions. However, if it acquires any
conflicting interest within the meaning of the indenture after a
default has occurred and is continuing, it must eliminate the
conflict within 90 days, apply to the Commission for
permission to continue as trustee or resign.
154
UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
The following is a summary of certain United States federal
income tax consequences relating to exchanging Old Notes for New
Notes. This discussion is not a complete discussion of all the
potential tax consequences that may be relevant to you. Your tax
treatment may vary depending on your particular situation. This
summary does not address all of the tax consequences that may be
relevant to holders that are subject to special tax treatment.
This discussion is based upon the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended (the Code), its legislative history, existing and
proposed regulations thereunder, published rulings, and court
decisions, all as in effect on the date of this document, and
all of which are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive
basis. We have not sought any ruling from the Internal Revenue
Service or an opinion of counsel with respect to the statements
made herein concerning the exchange of the notes, and we cannot
assure you that the Internal Revenue Service will agree with
such statements.
We urge you to consult your own tax advisors regarding the
particular United States federal tax consequences that may be
relevant to you, as well as any tax consequences that may arise
under the laws of any relevant foreign, state, local, or other
taxing jurisdiction or under any applicable tax treaty.
Your exchange of Old Notes for New Notes under the exchange
offer will not constitute a taxable exchange of the Old Notes.
As a result:
|
|
|
|
|
you will not recognize taxable gain or loss when you receive New
Notes in exchange for Old Notes; |
|
|
|
your holding period in the New Notes will include your holding
period in the Old Notes; and |
|
|
|
your basis in the New Notes will equal your adjusted basis in
the Old Notes at the time of the exchange. |
ERISA CONSIDERATIONS
If you intend to use plan assets to exchange for any of the
New Notes offered by this prospectus, you should consult with
counsel on the potential consequences of your investment under
the fiduciary responsibility provisions of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended
(ERISA), and the prohibited transaction provisions
of ERISA and the Code.
The following summary is based on the provisions of ERISA and
the Code and related guidance in effect as of the date of this
prospectus. This summary does not attempt to be a complete
summary of these considerations. Future legislation, court
decisions, administrative regulations or other guidance could
change the requirements summarized in this section. Any of these
changes could be made retroactively and could apply to
transactions entered into before the change is enacted.
Fiduciary Responsibilities
ERISA imposes requirements on (1) employee benefit plans
subject to ERISA, (2) entities whose underlying assets
include employee benefit plan assets, for example, collective
investment funds and insurance company general accounts, and
(3) fiduciaries of employee benefit plans. Under ERISA,
fiduciaries generally include persons who exercise discretionary
authority or control over plan assets. Before investing any
employee benefit plan assets in any note offered in connection
with this prospectus, you should determine whether the
investment:
|
|
|
(1) is permitted under the plan document and other
instruments governing the plan; and |
|
|
(2) is appropriate for the plan in view of its overall
investment policy and the composition and diversification of its
portfolio, taking into account the limited liquidity of the
notes. |
You should consider all factors and circumstances of a
particular investment in the notes, including, for example, the
risk factors discussed in Risk Factors and the fact
that in the future there may not be a market in which you will
be able to sell or otherwise dispose of your interest in the
notes.
155
We are not making any representation that the sale of any notes
to a plan meets the fiduciary requirements for investment by
plans generally or any particular plan or that such an
investment is appropriate for plans generally or any particular
plan. We are not providing any investment advice to any plan,
through this prospectus or otherwise.
Prohibited Transactions
ERISA and the Code prohibit a wide range of transactions
involving (1) employee benefit plans and arrangements
subject to ERISA and/or the Code, and (2) persons who have
specified relationships to the plans. These persons are called
parties in interest under ERISA and
disqualified persons under the Code. The
transactions prohibited by ERISA and the Code are called
prohibited transactions. If you are a party in
interest or disqualified person who engages in a prohibited
transaction, you may be subject to excise taxes and other
penalties and liabilities under ERISA and/or the Code. As a
result, if you are considering using plan assets to invest in
any of the notes offered for sale in connection with this
prospectus, you should consider whether the investment might be
a prohibited transaction under ERISA and/or the Code.
Prohibited transactions may arise, for example, if the notes are
acquired by a plan with respect to which we, the initial
purchasers or any of our respective affiliates, are parties in
interest or disqualified persons. Exemptions from the prohibited
transaction provisions of ERISA and the Code may apply depending
in part on the type of plan fiduciary making the decision to
acquire a note and the circumstances under which such decision
is made. Some of these exemptions include:
|
|
|
(1) Prohibited transaction class exemption or
PTCE exemption
75-1 (relating to
specified transactions involving employee benefit plans and
broker-dealers, reporting dealers and banks). |
|
|
(2) PTCE 84-14
(relating to specified transactions directed by independent
qualified professional asset managers); |
|
|
(3) PTCE 90-1
(relating to specified transactions involving insurance company
pooled separate accounts); |
|
|
(4) PTCE 91-38
(relating to specified transactions by bank collective
investment funds); |
|
|
(5) PTCE 95-60
(relating to specified transactions involving insurance company
general accounts); and |
|
|
(6) PTCE 96-23
(relating to specified transactions directed by in-house asset
managers). |
These exemptions do not, however, provide relief from the
self-dealing and conflicts of interests prohibitions under ERISA
and the Code. In addition, there is no assurance that any of
these class exemptions or other exemptions will be available
with respect to any particular transaction involving the notes.
Treatment of Insurance Company Assets as Plan Assets
Any insurance company proposing to invest assets of its general
account in the notes should consider the potential implications
of the U.S. Supreme Courts decision in John
Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Harris Trust and
Savings Bank, 510 U.S. 86, 114 S. Ct.
517 (1993), which, in some circumstances, treats such general
account as including the assets of a plan that owns a policy or
other contract with such insurance company, as well as the
potential effect of Section 401(c) of ERISA, PTCE 95-60,
and Department of Labor Regulations Section 2550.401c-1.
Foreign Indicia of Ownership
ERISA also prohibits plan fiduciaries from maintaining the
indicia of ownership of any plan assets outside the jurisdiction
of the United States district courts except in specified cases.
Before investing in
156
any note offered for sale in connection with this prospectus,
you should consider whether the acquisition, holding or
disposition of a note would satisfy such indicia of ownership
rules.
Representations and Warranties
If you acquire or accept a note offered in connection with this
prospectus, you and any subsequent transferee will be deemed to
have represented and warranted that either:
|
|
|
(1) you have not, directly or indirectly, used plan assets
to acquire such note; |
|
|
(2) your acquisition and holding of a note (A) is
exempt from the prohibited transaction restrictions of ERISA and
the Code under one or more prohibited transaction class
exemptions or does not constitute a prohibited transaction under
ERISA and the Code, and (B) meets the fiduciary
requirements of ERISA; or |
|
|
(3) if you use plan assets to acquire such note and you are
not otherwise subject to ERISA, such acquisition is in
compliance with the applicable laws governing such plan. |
GLOBAL SECURITIES; BOOK-ENTRY SYSTEM
The Global Securities
The notes will initially be represented by one or more permanent
global notes in definitive, fully registered book-entry form
(the global securities) which will be registered in the name of
Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC and deposited on behalf of
purchasers of the notes represented thereby with a custodian for
DTC for credit to the respective accounts of the purchasers (or
to such other accounts as they may direct) at DTC.
We expect that pursuant to procedures established by DTC
(a) upon deposit of the global securities, DTC or its
custodian will credit on its internal system portions of the
global securities which will contain the corresponding
respective amount of the global securities to the respective
accounts of persons who have accounts with such depositary and
(b) ownership of the notes will be shown on, and the
transfer of ownership thereof will be affected only through,
records maintained by DTC or its nominee (with respect to
interests of participants (as defined below) and the records of
participants (with respect to interests of persons other than
participants). Such accounts initially will be designated by or
on behalf of the initial purchasers and ownership of beneficial
interests in the global securities will be limited to persons
who have accounts with DTC (the participants) or persons who
hold interests through participants. Noteholders may hold their
interests in a global security directly through DTC if they are
participants in such system, or indirectly through organizations
which are participants in such system.
So long as DTC or its nominee is the registered owner or holder
of any of the notes, DTC or such nominee will be considered the
sole owner or holder of such notes represented by such global
securities for all purposes under the indenture and under the
notes represented thereby. No beneficial owner of an interest in
the global securities will be able to transfer such interest
except in accordance with the applicable procedures of DTC in
addition to those provided for under the indenture and, if
applicable, those of the Euroclear System (Euroclear) and
Clearstream Banking, société anonyme, Luxembourg
(Clearstream Luxembourg).
Certain Book-Entry Procedures for the Global Securities
The operations and procedures of DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream
Luxembourg are solely within the control of the respective
settlement systems and are subject to change by them from time
to time. Investors are urged to contact the relevant system or
its participants directly to discuss these matters.
157
DTC has advised us that it is:
|
|
|
|
|
a limited-purpose trust company organized under the laws of the
State of New York; |
|
|
|
a banking organization within the meaning of the New
York Banking Law; |
|
|
|
a member of the Federal Reserve System; |
|
|
|
a clearing corporation within the meaning of the New
York Uniform Commercial Code, as amended; and |
|
|
|
a clearing agency registered pursuant to
Section 17A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
DTC was created to hold securities for its participants
(collectively, the participants) and to facilitate the clearance
and settlement of securities transactions, such as transfers and
pledges, between participants through electronic book-entry
changes to the accounts of its participants, thereby eliminating
the need for physical transfer and delivery of certificates.
DTCs participants include securities brokers and dealers
(including the initial purchasers), banks and trust companies,
clearing corporations and certain other organizations. DTC is
owned by a number of its direct participants and by the
New York Stock Exchange, Inc., the American Stock Exchange
LLC and the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
Indirect access to DTCs system is also available to other
entities such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust companies
(collectively, the indirect participants) that clear through or
maintain a custodial relationship with a participant, either
directly or indirectly. Investors who are not participants may
beneficially own securities held by or on behalf of DTC only
through participants or indirect participants. The rules
applicable to DTC and its participants are on file with
the Commission.
The laws of some jurisdictions may require that some purchasers
of securities take physical delivery of those securities in
definitive form. Accordingly, the ability to transfer beneficial
interests in notes represented by a global security to those
persons may be limited. In addition, because DTC can act only on
behalf of its participants, who in turn act on behalf of persons
who hold interests through participants, the ability of a person
holding a beneficial interest in a global security to pledge or
transfer that interest to persons or entities that do not
participate in DTCs system, or to otherwise take actions
in respect of that interest, may be affected by the lack of a
physical security in respect of that interest.
So long as DTC or its nominee is the registered owner of a
global security, DTC or that nominee, as the case may be, will
be considered the sole legal owner or holder of the notes
represented by that global security for all purposes of the
notes and the Indenture. Except as provided below, owners of
beneficial interests in a global security will not be entitled
to have the notes represented by that global security registered
in their names, will not receive or be entitled to receive
physical delivery of certificated securities, and will not be
considered the owners or holders of the notes represented by
that beneficial interest under the Indenture for any purpose,
including with respect to the giving of any direction,
instruction or approval to the trustee. To facilitate subsequent
transfers, all global securities that are deposited with, or on
behalf of, DTC will be registered in the name of DTCs
nominee, Cede & Co. The deposit of global securities with,
or on behalf of, DTC and their registration in the name of Cede
& Co. effect no change in beneficial ownership. We
understand that DTC has no knowledge of the actual beneficial
owners of the securities. Accordingly, each holder owning a
beneficial interest in a global security must rely on the
procedures of DTC and, if that holder is not a participant or an
indirect participant, on the procedures of the participant
through which that holder owns its interest, to exercise any
rights of a holder of notes under the Indenture or that global
security. We understand that under existing industry practice,
in the event that we request any action of holders of notes, or
a holder that is an owner of a beneficial interest in a global
security desires to take any action that DTC, as the holder of
that global security, is entitled to take, DTC would authorize
the participants to take that action and the participants would
authorize holders owning through those participants to take that
action or would otherwise act upon the instruction of those
holders.
Conveyance of notices and other communications by DTC to its
direct participants, by its direct participants to indirect
participants and by its direct and indirect participants to
beneficial owners will be
158
governed by arrangements among them, subject to any statutory or
regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time.
Neither DTC nor Cede & Co. will consent or vote with respect
to the global securities. Under its usual procedures, DTC will
mail an omnibus proxy to us as soon as possible after the
applicable record date. The omnibus proxy assigns Cede &
Co.s consenting or voting rights to those direct
participants of DTC to whose accounts the securities are
credited on the applicable record date, which are identified in
a listing attached to the omnibus proxy.
Neither we nor the trustee will have any responsibility or
liability for any aspect of the records relating to or payments
made on account of notes by DTC, or for maintaining, supervising
or reviewing any records of DTC relating to the notes.
Payments with respect to the principal of and premium, if any,
and interest on a global security will be payable by the trustee
to or at the direction of DTC or its nominee in its capacity as
the registered holder of the global security under the
Indenture. Under the terms of the Indenture, we and the trustee
may treat the persons in whose names the notes, including the
global securities, are registered as the owners thereof for the
purpose of receiving payment thereon and for any and all other
purposes whatsoever. Accordingly, neither we nor the trustee has
or will have any responsibility or liability for the payment of
those amounts to owners of beneficial interests in a global
security. It is our understanding that DTCs practice is to
credit directly its participants accounts on the
applicable payment date in accordance with their respective
holdings shown on DTCs records, unless DTC has reason to
believe that it will not receive payment on that date. Payments
by the participants and the indirect participants to the owners
of beneficial interests in a global security will be governed by
standing instructions and customary industry practice and will
be the responsibility of the participants and indirect
participants and not of DTC, us or the trustee, subject to
statutory or regulatory requirements in effect at the time. None
of us, the trustee or any paying agent will have any
responsibility or liability for any aspect of the records
relating to, or payments made on account of, beneficial
interests in the global securities or for maintaining,
supervising or reviewing any records relating to those
beneficial interests.
Transfers between participants in DTC will be effected in
accordance with DTCs procedures, and will be settled in
same-day funds. Transfers between participants in Euroclear or
Clearstream Luxembourg will be effected in the ordinary way in
accordance with their respective rules and operating procedures.
Subject to compliance with the transfer restrictions applicable
to the notes, cross-market transfers between the participants in
DTC, on the one hand, and Euroclear or Clearstream Luxembourg
participants, on the other hand, will be effected through DTC in
accordance with DTCs rules on behalf of Euroclear or
Clearstream Luxembourg, as the case may be, by its respective
depositary; however, those crossmarket transactions will require
delivery of instructions to Euroclear or Clearstream Luxembourg,
as the case may be, by the counterparty in that system in
accordance with the rules and procedures and within the
established deadlines (Brussels time) of that system. Euroclear
or Clearstream Luxembourg, as the case may be, will, if the
transaction meets its settlement requirements, deliver
instructions to its respective depositary to take action to
effect final settlement on its behalf by delivering or receiving
interests in the relevant global securities in DTC, and making
or receiving payment in accordance with normal procedures for
same-day funds settlement applicable to DTC. Euroclear
participants and Clearstream Luxembourg participants may not
deliver instructions directly to the depositaries for Euroclear
or Clearstream Luxembourg.
Because of time zone differences, the securities account of a
Euroclear or Clearstream Luxembourg participant purchasing an
interest in a global security from a participant in DTC will be
credited, and any such crediting will be reported to the
relevant Euroclear or Clearstream Luxembourg participant, during
the securities settlement processing day (which must be a
business day for Euroclear and Clearstream Luxembourg)
immediately following the settlement date of DTC. Cash received
in Euroclear or Clearstream Luxembourg as a result of sales of
interests in a global security by or through a Euroclear or
Clearstream Luxembourg participant to a participant in DTC will
be received with value on the settlement
159
date of DTC but will be available in the relevant Euroclear or
Clearstream Luxembourg cash account only as of the business day
for Euroclear or Clearstream Luxembourg following DTCs
settlement date.
Although we understand that DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream
Luxembourg have agreed to the foregoing procedures to facilitate
transfers of interests in the global securities among
participants in DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream Luxembourg, they
are under no obligation to perform or to continue to perform
those procedures, and those procedures may be discontinued at
any time. Neither we nor the trustee will have any
responsibility for the performance by DTC, Euroclear or
Clearstream Luxembourg or their respective participants or
indirect participants of their respective obligations under the
rules and procedures governing their operations.
DTC, Euroclear or Clearstream Luxembourg may discontinue
providing its services as securities depositary with respect to
the global securities at any time by giving reasonable notice to
us or the trustee. Under such circumstances, if a successor
securities depositary is not obtained, certificates for the
securities are required to be printed and delivered.
We may decide to discontinue use of the system of book-entry
transfers through DTC or a successor securities depositary. In
that event, certificates for the securities will be printed and
delivered.
We have provided the foregoing information with respect to DTC
to the financial community for information purposes only. We
obtained the information in this section and elsewhere in this
prospectus concerning DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream Luxembourg
and their respective book-entry systems from sources that we
believe are reliable. Although we expect DTC, Euroclear or
Clearstream Luxembourg and their participants to follow the
foregoing procedures in order to facilitate transfers of
interests in global securities among their respective
participants, they are under no obligation to perform or
continue to perform such procedures and such procedures may be
discontinued at any time.
EXCHANGE OFFER AND REGISTRATION RIGHTS
In connection with the issuance of the Old Notes, we entered
into a registration rights agreement with Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner & Smith Incorporated, J.P. Morgan Securities
Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC, Lehman Brothers Inc. and
Raymond James & Associates, Inc., (collectively, the
Initial Purchasers). The following summary of
selected provisions of the registration rights agreement is not
complete and is subject to all the provisions of the
registration rights agreement. Copies of the registration rights
agreement are available from us upon request as described under
Where You Can Find More Information.
Pursuant to the registration rights agreement, we agreed to file
with the Commission this exchange offer registration statement
with respect to a registered offer to exchange the Old Notes for
New Notes, which have terms identical to the Old Notes in all
material respects except that such notes will not contain terms
with respect to transfer restrictions, registration rights and
payment of additional interest. Upon the effectiveness of this
exchange offer registration statement, pursuant to the exchange
offer we will offer to the holders of the transfer restricted
Old Notes who are able to make certain representations, the
opportunity to exchange their transfer restricted Old Notes for
New Notes. If, upon consummation of the exchange offer, the
initial purchasers hold notes acquired by them as part of the
Old Notes initial distribution, we, simultaneously with
the delivery of the New Notes pursuant to the exchange offer,
will issue and deliver to the initial purchasers, in a private
exchange for the notes held by the initial purchasers, a like
principal amount of our New Notes issued under the indenture and
identical in all material respects to the New Notes issued in
the exchange offer, except such notes issued in the private
exchange shall include restrictions on transfer under the
Securities Act and the securities laws of the several states of
the United States.
If:
|
|
|
|
|
because of any changes in law, Commission rules or regulations
or applicable interpretations by the staff of the Commission, we
are not permitted to effect the exchange offer; |
160
|
|
|
|
|
for any other reason the exchange offer registration statement,
of which this prospectus is a part, is not declared effective
within 180 days following the original issuance of the Old
Notes, or the exchange offer is not consummated within
210 days after the original issuance of the Old Notes; |
|
|
|
upon the request of any of the Initial Purchasers; or |
|
|
|
a holder of the Old Notes is not permitted to participate in the
exchange offer or does not receive fully tradeable New Notes
pursuant to the exchange offer; |
we will:
|
|
|
|
|
as promptly as practicable, file with the Commission, and use
our best efforts to cause to be declared effective as promptly
as practicable but not later than 210 days after the
original issuance of the Old Notes, a shelf registration
statement relating to the offer and sale of the New Notes; and |
|
|
|
use our best efforts to keep the shelf registration statement
continuously effective for a period of two years from the date
the shelf registration statement is declared effective, or for
such shorter period that will terminate when all of the New
Notes covered by the shelf registration statement have been sold
or cease to be outstanding or otherwise registrable securities
within the meaning of the registration rights agreement. |
If we file a shelf registration statement, we will notify you
when the shelf registration statement has become effective and
take other actions that are required to permit unrestricted
resales of the Old Notes. If you sell Old Notes under the shelf
registration statement, you will be:
|
|
|
|
|
required to deliver information to be used in connection with
the shelf registration statement; |
|
|
|
required to be named as a selling securityholder in the related
prospectus; |
|
|
|
required to deliver a prospectus to purchasers; |
|
|
|
subject to certain of the civil liability provisions under the
Securities Act in connection with the sales; and |
|
|
|
bound by some of the provisions of the registration rights
agreement, including those regarding indemnification rights and
obligations. |
For purposes of the registration rights agreement,
registrable securities means the notes, provided,
however, that the notes shall cease to be registrable securities
when (1) a registration statement with respect to such
notes has been declared effective and such notes have been
disposed of pursuant to the registration statement,
(2) such notes have been sold to the public pursuant to
Rule 144 (or any similar provision then in force, but not
Rule 144A), (3) such notes have ceased to be
outstanding or (4) the exchange offer is consummated.
The registration rights agreement also provides that
we will:
|
|
|
|
|
file this exchange offer registration statement with the
Commission not later than 90 days following the closing of
the offering of the Old Notes; |
|
|
|
use our best efforts to have this exchange offer registration
statement declared effective under the Securities Act within
180 days of the closing of the offering of the Old Notes; |
|
|
|
use our best efforts to keep this exchange offer registration
statement effective until the closing of the exchange offer; and |
|
|
|
use our best efforts to cause the exchange to be consummated not
later than 210 days following the closing of the offering of the
Old Notes. |
Promptly after this exchange offer registration statement has
been declared effective, we will offer the registered New Notes
in exchange for surrender of the Old Notes. We will keep the
exchange offer open for not less than 20 business days, or
longer if required by applicable law, after the date notice of
the exchange offer is mailed to holders. Interest will accrue on
each registered New Notes from the last
161
interest payment date on which we paid interest on the Old Notes
tendered in the exchange offer, or if we have not paid interest
on the tendered Old Notes, from the date of original issuance of
the note.
If:
|
|
|
|
|
we do not file with the Commission the exchange offer
registration statement on or prior to the 90th day
following the original issuance of the Old Notes; |
|
|
|
the Commission does not declare the exchange offer registration
statement effective on or prior to the 180th day following
the original issuance of the Old Notes; |
|
|
|
we do not consummate the exchange offer on or prior to the
210th day following the original issuance of the Old Notes;
or |
|
|
|
we have filed, but the Commission has not declared effective,
the shelf registration statement on or prior to the
210th day following the original issuance of the Old Notes; |
(each, a Registration Default) then additional
interest would accrue on the Old Notes at an amount equal to
0.25% per annum of the principal amount of transfer restricted
securities held by such holder for the first 90 day period
immediately following the occurrence of each Registration
Default, and such annual rate will increase by an additional
0.25% with respect to each subsequent 90-day period, increasing
to a maximum of 1.00% per annum, from and including the date on
which any such Registration Default occurs. Following the cure
of all Registration Defaults, the accrual of additional interest
will cease. Because we were unable to fulfill our obligations
under the registration rights agreement, we are currently paying
additional interest at a rate of 1.00%.
Holders of Old Notes will be required to make certain
representations to us, as described in the registration rights
agreement, in order to participate in the exchange offer and
will be required to deliver information to be used in connection
with the shelf registration statement and to provide comments on
the shelf registration statement within the time periods set
forth in the registration rights agreement and will be named as
a selling security holder in such shelf registration statement
in order to have their Old Notes included in the shelf
registration statement and benefit from the provisions regarding
additional interest set forth above. Any holders, other than the
initial purchasers, who are eligible to participate in the
exchange offer but fail to, or elect not to, participate therein
will continue to hold transfer restricted Old Notes. The
transfer restricted Old Notes will remain outstanding and will
continue to accrue interest, but holders of transfer restricted
Old Notes will have no further rights to exchange their transfer
restricted Old Notes or have such securities registered under
the registration rights agreement.
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
Based on interpretations by the staff of the Commission set
forth in no action letters issued to third parties, we believe
that you may transfer New Notes issued under the exchange offer
in exchange for Old Notes unless you are:
|
|
|
|
|
our affiliate within the meaning of Rule 405
under the Securities Act; |
|
|
|
a broker-dealer that acquired Old Notes directly from us; or |
|
|
|
a broker-dealer that acquired Old Notes as a result of
market-making or other trading activities without compliance
with the registration and prospectus delivery provisions of the
Securities Act; |
provided that you acquire the New Notes in the ordinary course
of your business and you are not engaged in, and do not intend
to engage in, and have no arrangement or understanding with any
person to participate in, a distribution of the New Notes.
Broker-dealers receiving New Notes in the exchange offer will be
subject to a prospectus delivery requirement with respect to
resales of the New Notes.
To date, the staff of the Commission has taken the position that
participating broker-dealers may fulfill their prospectus
delivery requirements with respect to transactions involving an
exchange of
162
securities such as this exchange offer, other than a resale of
an unsold allotment from the original sale of the Old Notes,
with the prospectus contained in the exchange offer registration
statement.
Each broker-dealer that receives New Notes for its own account
pursuant to the exchange offer must acknowledge that it will
deliver a prospectus in connection with any resale of such New
Notes. This prospectus, as it may be amended or supplemented
from time to time, may be used by a broker-dealer in connection
with resales of New Notes received in exchange for Old Notes
where such Old Notes were acquired as a result of market-making
activities or other trading activities. In addition, until
November 29, 2006, all dealers effecting transactions in
the New Notes may be required to deliver a prospectus.
We will not receive any proceeds from any sale of New Notes by
broker-dealers. New Notes received by broker-dealers for their
own account pursuant to the exchange offer may be sold from time
to time in one or more transactions in the
over-the-counter
market, in negotiated transactions, through the writing of
options on the New Notes or a combination of such methods of
resale, at market prices prevailing at the time of resale, at
prices related to such prevailing market prices or negotiated
prices. Any such resale may be made directly to purchasers or to
or through brokers or dealers who may receive compensation in
the form of commissions or concessions from any such
broker-dealer or the purchasers of any such New Notes. Any
broker-dealer that resells New Notes that were received by it
for its own account pursuant to the exchange offer and any
broker or dealer that participates in a distribution of such New
Notes may be deemed to be an underwriter within the
meaning of the Securities Act and any profit on any such resale
of New Notes and any commission or concessions received by any
such persons may be deemed to be underwriting compensation under
the Securities Act. The letter of transmittal states that, by
acknowledging that it will deliver and by delivering a
prospectus, a broker-dealer will not be deemed to admit that it
is an underwriter within the meaning of the
Securities Act.
We have agreed to pay all expenses incident to the exchange
offer (including the expenses of one counsel for the holders of
the notes), other than commissions or concessions of any brokers
or dealers, and will indemnify the holders of the notes
(including any broker-dealers) against specified liabilities,
including liabilities under the Securities Act.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity and enforceability of the notes offered hereby will
be passed upon for Service Corporation International by Locke
Liddell & Sapp LLP, Houston, Texas.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of Service Corporation
International as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005
and managements assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting (which is included in
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting) as of December 31, 2005 included in this
prospectus have been so included in reliance on the report
(which contains an explanatory paragraph relating to Service
Corporation Internationals restatement of its consolidated
financial statements as described in note two to the
consolidated financial statements) of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as
experts in auditing and accounting.
The consolidated balance sheets of Alderwoods as at
December 31, 2005 and January 1, 2005, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders
equity, and cash flows for the fifty-two weeks ended
December 31, 2005, the fifty-two weeks ended
January 1, 2005, and the fifty-three weeks ended
January 3, 2004, and managements assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
(which is included in Managements Report on Internal
Control over Financial Reporting) as of December 31, 2005
included in this prospectus have been included herein in
reliance upon the reports of KPMG LLP, independent
registered public accounting firm, appearing elsewhere herein,
and upon the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and
accounting.
163
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
SCIs Interim Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
F-2 |
|
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of
June 30, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders
Equity for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
SCIs Annual Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
|
|
|
F-28 |
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-30 |
|
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
F-32 |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
F-33 |
|
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
F-34 |
|
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity for the
three years ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
F-35 |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-36 |
|
Financial Statement Schedule:
|
|
|
|
|
II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
|
|
|
F-101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alderwoods Interim Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 17, 2006 and
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
F-102 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the 12 and 24 Weeks
Ended June 17, 2006 and June 18, 2005
|
|
|
F-103 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity for the
24 Weeks June 17, 2006
|
|
|
F-104 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the 12 and
24 Weeks Ended June 17, 2006 and June 18, 2005
|
|
|
F-105 |
|
Notes to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-106 |
|
|
Alderwoods Annual Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
|
|
|
F-130 |
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-131 |
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-132 |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2005 and
January 1, 2005
|
|
|
F-133 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the 52 Weeks
Ended December 31, 2005, 52 Weeks Ended
January 1, 2005, and 53 Weeks Ended January 3,
2004
|
|
|
F-134 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity for the
52 Weeks Ended December 31, 2005, 52 Weeks Ended
January 1, 2005, and 53 Weeks Ended January 3,
2004
|
|
|
F-135 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the 52 Weeks
Ended December 31, 2005, 52 Weeks Ended
January 1, 2005, and 53 Weeks Ended January 3,
2004
|
|
|
F-137 |
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-138 |
|
F-1
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
|
note 2 | |
|
|
|
note 2 | |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
431,345 |
|
|
$ |
431,842 |
|
|
$ |
873,143 |
|
|
$ |
879,284 |
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(348,208 |
) |
|
|
(358,798 |
) |
|
|
(702,399 |
) |
|
|
(708,440 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
83,137 |
|
|
|
73,044 |
|
|
|
170,744 |
|
|
|
170,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(20,922 |
) |
|
|
(22,485 |
) |
|
|
(42,929 |
) |
|
|
(42,192 |
) |
Gains (losses) on dispositions and impairment charges, net
|
|
|
(2,881 |
) |
|
|
4,528 |
|
|
|
(7,391 |
) |
|
|
(1,213 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
59,334 |
|
|
|
55,087 |
|
|
|
120,424 |
|
|
|
127,439 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(26,609 |
) |
|
|
(26,224 |
) |
|
|
(53,337 |
) |
|
|
(51,229 |
) |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,051 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,258 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
6,782 |
|
|
|
3,894 |
|
|
|
12,763 |
|
|
|
7,950 |
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
1,632 |
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
4,046 |
|
|
|
(637 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,195 |
) |
|
|
(34,810 |
) |
|
|
(36,528 |
) |
|
|
(58,174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
41,139 |
|
|
|
20,277 |
|
|
|
83,896 |
|
|
|
69,265 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(15,506 |
) |
|
|
(9,553 |
) |
|
|
(31,282 |
) |
|
|
(27,073 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
|
25,633 |
|
|
|
10,724 |
|
|
|
52,614 |
|
|
|
42,192 |
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations (net of income tax
benefit (provision) of $115, $(826), $150, and $(1,981),
respectively)
|
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
|
3,113 |
|
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
4,288 |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change (net of income tax
benefit of $117,428)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(187,538 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
25,450 |
|
|
$ |
13,837 |
|
|
$ |
52,376 |
|
|
$ |
(141,058 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
$ |
.09 |
|
|
$ |
.04 |
|
|
$ |
.18 |
|
|
$ |
.14 |
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.01 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.61 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
.09 |
|
|
$ |
.05 |
|
|
$ |
.18 |
|
|
$ |
(.46 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
$ |
.09 |
|
|
$ |
.04 |
|
|
$ |
.18 |
|
|
$ |
.14 |
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.01 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.60 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
.09 |
|
|
$ |
.05 |
|
|
$ |
.18 |
|
|
$ |
(.45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of shares
|
|
|
293,409 |
|
|
|
302,363 |
|
|
|
293,580 |
|
|
|
307,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of shares
|
|
|
297,501 |
|
|
|
306,404 |
|
|
|
297,784 |
|
|
|
311,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per share
|
|
$ |
.025 |
|
|
$ |
.025 |
|
|
$ |
.050 |
|
|
$ |
.050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements)
F-2
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
note 2 | |
Assets |
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
529,171 |
|
|
$ |
446,782 |
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
|
62,439 |
|
|
|
97,747 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
64,938 |
|
|
|
68,327 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
30,847 |
|
|
|
37,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
687,395 |
|
|
|
650,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
1,227,144 |
|
|
|
1,226,192 |
|
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
1,285,832 |
|
|
|
1,288,515 |
|
Cemetery property, at cost
|
|
|
1,365,712 |
|
|
|
1,355,654 |
|
Property and equipment, at cost, net
|
|
|
1,038,990 |
|
|
|
950,174 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,118,119 |
|
|
|
1,123,888 |
|
Deferred charges and other assets
|
|
|
253,727 |
|
|
|
249,581 |
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments
|
|
|
693,781 |
|
|
|
700,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,670,700 |
|
|
$ |
7,544,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities & Stockholders Equity |
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$ |
196,977 |
|
|
$ |
231,693 |
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
30,414 |
|
|
|
20,716 |
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
21,014 |
|
|
|
20,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
248,405 |
|
|
|
272,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,265,263 |
|
|
|
1,186,485 |
|
Deferred preneed funeral revenues
|
|
|
539,178 |
|
|
|
535,384 |
|
Deferred preneed cemetery revenues
|
|
|
777,717 |
|
|
|
792,485 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
168,925 |
|
|
|
138,677 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
315,403 |
|
|
|
326,985 |
|
Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts
|
|
|
2,055,566 |
|
|
|
2,015,811 |
|
Non-controlling interest in cemetery perpetual care trusts
|
|
|
691,385 |
|
|
|
694,619 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (note 10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $1 per share par value,
500,000,000 shares authorized, 292,411,418 and 294,808,872,
issued and outstanding (net of 51,956,842 and 48,962,063
treasury shares, at par)
|
|
|
292,411 |
|
|
|
294,809 |
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
2,145,516 |
|
|
|
2,182,745 |
|
|
Unearned compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,593 |
) |
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(910,529 |
) |
|
|
(962,905 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
81,460 |
|
|
|
70,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,608,858 |
|
|
|
1,581,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,670,700 |
|
|
$ |
7,544,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements)
F-3
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
|
note 2 | |
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
52,376 |
|
|
$ |
(141,058 |
) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss (income) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
(4,288 |
) |
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,258 |
|
|
|
Premiums paid on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,186 |
) |
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,538 |
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
45,670 |
|
|
|
36,525 |
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
4,718 |
|
|
|
4,494 |
|
|
|
Provision for deferred income taxes
|
|
|
25,063 |
|
|
|
25,573 |
|
|
|
Losses on dispositions and impairment charges, net
|
|
|
7,391 |
|
|
|
1,213 |
|
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
3,856 |
|
|
|
996 |
|
|
|
Loan cost amortization
|
|
|
5,070 |
|
|
|
5,052 |
|
|
Change in assets and liabilities, net of effects from
acquisitions and dispositions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in receivables
|
|
|
17,976 |
|
|
|
11,135 |
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in other assets
|
|
|
(3,639 |
) |
|
|
27,956 |
|
|
|
Decrease in payables and other liabilities
|
|
|
(39,139 |
) |
|
|
(12,091 |
) |
|
|
Net effect of preneed funeral production and maturities
|
|
|
4,421 |
|
|
|
(3,054 |
) |
|
|
Net effect of cemetery production and deliveries
|
|
|
27,866 |
|
|
|
45,967 |
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(264 |
) |
|
|
4,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing
operations
|
|
|
151,603 |
|
|
|
192,116 |
|
Net cash used in operating activities from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,688 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
151,603 |
|
|
|
190,428 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(40,547 |
) |
|
|
(43,752 |
) |
|
Proceeds from divestitures, net of cash retained and sales of
property and equipment
|
|
|
26,955 |
|
|
|
56,060 |
|
|
Proceeds from equity investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,070 |
|
|
Indemnity payments related to the sale of former funeral
operations in France
|
|
|
(412 |
) |
|
|
(1,602 |
) |
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(14,677 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net withdrawals (deposits) of restricted funds and other
|
|
|
11,025 |
|
|
|
(9,026 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities from
continuing operations
|
|
|
(17,656 |
) |
|
|
33,750 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities from
discontinued operations
|
|
|
10,958 |
|
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(6,698 |
) |
|
|
33,595 |
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291,472 |
|
|
Payments of debt
|
|
|
(13,713 |
) |
|
|
(2,988 |
) |
|
Principal payments on capital leases
|
|
|
(10,701 |
) |
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
Early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(286,215 |
) |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
2,402 |
|
|
|
4,556 |
|
|
Purchase of Company common stock
|
|
|
(27,870 |
) |
|
|
(189,809 |
) |
|
Payments of dividends
|
|
|
(14,719 |
) |
|
|
(7,729 |
) |
|
Purchase of subsidiary stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(844 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(64,601 |
) |
|
|
(191,713 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency
|
|
|
2,085 |
|
|
|
(140 |
) |
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
82,389 |
|
|
|
32,170 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
446,782 |
|
|
|
287,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
529,171 |
|
|
$ |
319,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements)
F-4
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury | |
|
Capital in | |
|
|
|
|
|
other | |
|
|
Outstanding | |
|
Common | |
|
stock, par | |
|
excess of | |
|
Unearned | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
comprehensive | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Stock | |
|
value | |
|
par value | |
|
Compensation | |
|
Deficit | |
|
income | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at December 31, 2005 (Restated-note 2)
|
|
|
294,809 |
|
|
$ |
343,771 |
|
|
$ |
(48,962 |
) |
|
$ |
2,182,745 |
|
|
$ |
(3,593 |
) |
|
$ |
(962,905 |
) |
|
$ |
70,499 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared on common stock ($.05 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,741 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,961 |
|
Employee share based compensation earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of unearned compensation for restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,593 |
) |
|
|
3,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option exercises and other
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
2,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock awards, net of forfeitures
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
(356 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of Company stock
|
|
|
(3,420 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,420 |
) |
|
|
(24,450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2006
|
|
|
292,411 |
|
|
$ |
344,368 |
|
|
$ |
(51,957 |
) |
|
$ |
2,145,516 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(910,529 |
) |
|
$ |
81,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements)
F-5
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Service Corporation International (SCI or the Company) is a
provider of deathcare products and services, with a network of
funeral service locations and cemeteries primarily operating in
the United States and Canada. The Company also owns a
25 percent equity interest in funeral operations of an
entity in France. Additionally, the Company owns Kenyon
International Emergency Services (Kenyon), a wholly owned
subsidiary that specializes in providing disaster management
services in mass fatality incidents. Kenyons results are
included in the Companys funeral operations segment.
Funeral service locations provide all professional services
relating to atneed funerals, including the use of funeral
facilities and motor vehicles and preparation and embalming
services. Funeral related merchandise (including caskets, burial
vaults, cremation receptacles, flowers, and other ancillary
products and services) is sold at funeral service locations.
Certain funeral service locations contain crematoria. The
Company also sells preneed funeral services whereby a customer
contractually agrees to the terms of a funeral to be performed
in the future. The Companys cemeteries provide cemetery
property interment rights (including mausoleum spaces, lots, and
lawn crypts) and sell cemetery related merchandise (including
stone and bronze memorials, markers, and cremation
memorialization products) and services (primarily merchandise
installations and burial openings and closings). Cemetery items
are sold on an atneed or preneed basis. Personnel at cemeteries
perform interment services and provide management and
maintenance of cemetery grounds. Certain cemeteries operate
crematoria, and certain cemeteries contain gardens specifically
for the purpose of cremation memorialization.
|
|
2. |
Restatement of Financial Statements |
The Company has restated herein its previously issued condensed
consolidated statement of operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2005, its condensed consolidated
statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30,
2005, and its condensed consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2005. This restatement corrects errors related
to 1) the miscalculation of the Companys actuarially
determined pension benefit obligation, 2) the accounting
for certain leases related to funeral home properties which were
previously accounted for as operating leases, but should have
been accounted for as capital leases, and 3) other
out-of-period
adjustments previously identified by the Company but deemed to
be not material either individually or in the aggregate. All
applicable amounts related to this restatement have been
reflected in the Companys condensed consolidated financial
statements and disclosed in the notes to the condensed
consolidated financial statements in this
Form 10-Q.
|
|
|
Pension Benefit Obligation |
As previously disclosed in the Companys 2004
Form 10-K,
effective January 1, 2004, the Company adopted a new
accounting policy related to the accounting for actuarial gains
and losses in its pension plan. Under the new accounting policy,
the Company began to recognize such actuarial gains and losses
in its consolidated statement of operations as they occurred.
Previously, the Company amortized the difference between actual
and expected investment returns and other actuarial gains and
losses over seven years (except to the extent that settlements
with employees required earlier recognition). As a result of
this accounting change, the Company initially recognized an
after tax charge in its 2004 financial statements, representing
the cumulative effect of this accounting change, of $33,599
($54,873 before tax). This amount represented the accumulated
unrecognized net losses related to the pension plan assets and
liabilities as of January 1, 2004.
During the second quarter of 2006, the Company discovered that
its actuarially determined pension benefit obligation
(PBO) had been incorrectly calculated for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004, 2003, and 2002 as the impact of
pending lump sum cash settlements in the PBO calculation at the
end of
F-6
each respective year had been inadvertently omitted. The net
aggregate pre-tax impact of this error over the four-year period
ended December 31, 2005 was $4,233. Had this
PBO calculation been correct at the time the Company
adopted its new accounting policy effective January 1,
2004, the Company would have recognized an additional cumulative
effect of accounting change of $4,961 ($3,037 after tax) in its
December 31, 2004 consolidated statement of operations, as
the vast majority of the impact of previously unrecognized
pending lump sum settlements for 2002 and 2003 would have been
recognized in connection with the accounting policy change.
In addition, the Company also identified an actuarial
calculation error that resulted in an understatement of pension
expense of $1,940 in the fourth quarter of 2005.
As previously disclosed in the Companys first quarter 2006
Form 10-Q, the
Company determined, in the first quarter of 2006, that certain
of its leases related to funeral home properties that were
previously accounted for as operating leases should have been
accounted for as capital leases. The aggregate pre-tax
adjustment to the Companys previously issued consolidated
financial statements is $2,677, of which $657 relates to the
three-year period ended December 31, 2005. The remaining
$2,020 relates to periods prior to January 1, 2003.
|
|
|
Other
Out-of-Period
Adjustments |
The Company has also included other adjustments that were
previously identified but deemed to be not material either
individually or in the aggregate and therefore corrected in a
subsequent period. Such adjustments impacted the timing of
expense items, including income tax expenses previously
recognized in the first quarter of 2006. The cumulative amount
of such out-of-period
adjustments was a net aggregate decrease to pre-tax income of
$1,079 and an additional $496 of income tax expense for the year
ended December 31, 2005.
The Company evaluated the materiality of these adjustments to
its previously issued interim and annual financial statements
including its interim financial statements as of and for the
three months ended March 31, 2006. The Company determined
that the impact of these errors was not material to its
previously issued consolidated financial statements; however,
the Company has determined that the cumulative correction of the
errors in the second quarter of 2006 would have been material to
the current period. Therefore, in accordance with
paragraph 29 of Accounting Principles Board Opinion
No. 28 and the SECs Staff Accounting Bulletin
(SAB) Topic 5-F, the Company will restate its previously
issued financial statements to reflect the corrections of the
errors in each of the periods affected. As a result, the Company
has restated its consolidated statements of operations for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2005, its consolidated
statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 2005, and
its
F-7
consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2005. The effect
of the adjustments to the Companys consolidated statement
of operations for the three and six months ended June 30,
2005 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the | |
|
For the | |
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
June 30, 2005 | |
|
June 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
As | |
|
|
|
As | |
|
|
|
|
Previously | |
|
As | |
|
Previously | |
|
As | |
|
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
(Unaudited) | |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
431,710 |
|
|
$ |
431,842 |
|
|
$ |
879,152 |
|
|
$ |
879,284 |
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(359,367 |
) |
|
|
(358,798 |
) |
|
|
(709,582 |
) |
|
|
(708,440 |
) |
Gross profits
|
|
|
72,343 |
|
|
|
73,044 |
|
|
|
169,570 |
|
|
|
170,844 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
54,377 |
|
|
|
55,087 |
|
|
|
126,147 |
|
|
|
127,439 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(25,875 |
) |
|
|
(26,224 |
) |
|
|
(50,531 |
) |
|
|
(51,229 |
) |
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
cumulative effects of accounting changes
|
|
|
19,916 |
|
|
|
20,277 |
|
|
|
68,671 |
|
|
|
69,265 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(9,324 |
) |
|
|
(9,553 |
) |
|
|
(26,662 |
) |
|
|
(27,073 |
) |
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effects of
accounting changes
|
|
|
10,592 |
|
|
|
10,724 |
|
|
|
42,009 |
|
|
|
42,192 |
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
13,705 |
|
|
$ |
13,837 |
|
|
$ |
(141,241 |
) |
|
$ |
(141,058 |
) |
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
.05 |
|
|
$ |
.05 |
|
|
$ |
(.46 |
) |
|
$ |
(.46 |
) |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
.04 |
|
|
$ |
.05 |
|
|
$ |
(.45 |
) |
|
$ |
(.45 |
) |
The effect of the above restatement on the Companys
previously reported condensed consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2005 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
As Previously | |
|
As | |
|
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Selected condensed consolidated balance sheet data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, at cost, net
|
|
$ |
942,229 |
|
|
$ |
950,174 |
|
|
Deferred charges and other assets
|
|
|
249,449 |
|
|
|
249,581 |
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
7,536,692 |
|
|
|
7,544,769 |
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
231,129 |
|
|
|
231,693 |
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
20,468 |
|
|
|
20,716 |
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,175,463 |
|
|
|
1,186,485 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
141,676 |
|
|
|
138,677 |
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
320,812 |
|
|
|
326,985 |
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,588,486 |
|
|
|
1,581,555 |
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
7,536,692 |
|
|
$ |
7,544,769 |
|
The effect of the above restatement on the Companys
previously reported condensed consolidated statement of cash
flows for the six months ended June 30, 2005 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
June 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
As Previously | |
|
As | |
|
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
190,331 |
|
|
|
190,428 |
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(191,616 |
) |
|
|
(191,713 |
) |
F-8
The Company has also reflected the effects of this restatement
in notes five, six, seven, eight, nine and eleven to these
condensed consolidated financial statements.
|
|
3. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
|
|
|
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of
Presentation |
The condensed consolidated financial statements for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 include the
accounts of SCI and all majority-owned subsidiaries. These
statements also include the accounts of the funeral trusts,
cemetery merchandise and services trusts, and perpetual care
trusts in which the Company has a variable interest and is the
primary beneficiary. The interim condensed consolidated
financial statements are unaudited but include all adjustments,
consisting of normal recurring accruals and any other
adjustments, which management considers necessary for a fair
presentation of the results for these periods. These condensed
consolidated financial statements have been prepared in a manner
consistent with the accounting policies described in the
Companys annual report on
Form 10-K, as
amended for the year ended December 31, 2005, unless
otherwise disclosed herein, and should be read in conjunction
therewith. The accompanying year-end condensed balance sheet
data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not
include all disclosures required by accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Operating
results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of
the results that may be expected for the full year period.
The Company has reclassified certain prior period amounts to
conform to the current period financial presentation with no
effect on previously reported results of operations, financial
condition, or net cash flows.
The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to
make estimates and assumptions as described in the
Companys
Form 10-K, as
amended that may affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements
and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting
period. As a result, actual results could differ from these
estimates.
|
|
4. |
Recently Issued Accounting Standards |
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN 48), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty of
income tax positions recognized in an enterprises
financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48
prescribes a comprehensive model for how a company should
recognize, measure, present, and disclose in its financial
statements uncertain tax positions that the company has taken or
expects to take. It presumes the taxing authorities full
knowledge of the position, including all relevant facts. The
provisions of FIN 48 are effective beginning
January 1, 2007 for SCI, with any potential cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle recorded as an
adjustment to beginning retained earnings. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of adopting FIN 48 on its
consolidated financial statements.
|
|
5. |
Share-Based Compensation and Stockholders Equity |
(All shares reported in whole numbers)
In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R).
SFAS 123R is a revision of SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and
supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
F-9
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees
(APB 25). Among other items, SFAS 123R eliminates the
use of the intrinsic value method of accounting and requires
companies to recognize in the statement of operations the cost
of employee services received in exchange for awards of equity
instruments based on the grant-date fair value of those awards.
The Company adopted SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006 and
utilizes the modified-prospective transition method.
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for
share-based payments using the intrinsic value recognition
method prescribed by APB 25. Because all of the
Companys stock options were granted at market value on the
date of each grant, no stock-based compensation expense related
to stock options was reflected in net income prior to adopting
SFAS 123R.
Under the modified-prospective transition method, the Company
recognizes compensation expense on a straight-line basis in its
condensed consolidated financial statements issued subsequent to
the date of adoption for all share-based payments granted,
modified or settled after December 31, 2005, as well as for
any awards that were granted prior to December 31, 2005 for
which requisite service will be provided after December 31,
2005. The compensation expense on awards granted prior to
December 31, 2005 is recognized using the fair values
determined for the pro forma disclosures on stock-based
compensation included in prior filings. The amount of
compensation expense recognized on awards that were not fully
vested at the date of SFAS 123R adoption excludes the
compensation expense cumulatively recognized in the pro forma
disclosures on stock-based compensation. Further, the Company
assumed no forfeitures on restricted shares granted prior to the
adoption of SFAS 123R due to the nature of the employees to
whom the shares were granted, thus the Company recorded no
cumulative effect of accounting change upon the adoption of
SFAS 123R.
The Company maintains benefit plans whereby shares of its common
stock may be issued pursuant to the exercise of stock options or
restricted stock granted to officers and key employees. The
Companys Amended 1996 Incentive Plan reserves
24,000,000 shares of common stock for outstanding and
future awards of stock options, restricted stock, and other
stock based awards to officers and key employees of the Company.
The Companys 1996 Non-qualified Incentive Plan reserves
8,700,000 shares of common stock for outstanding and future
awards of nonqualified stock options to employees who are not
officers of the Company.
The benefit plans allow for options to be granted as either
non-qualified or incentive stock options. The options
historically have been granted only once each year, or upon
hire, as approved by the appropriate committee of the Board of
Directors. The options are granted with an exercise price equal
to the market price of the Companys common stock on the
date the grant is approved by the appropriate committee of the
Board of Directors. The options are generally exercisable at a
rate of
331/3%
each year unless alternative vesting methods are approved by the
appropriate committee of the Board of Directors. Restricted
stock awards generally vest at a rate of
331/3%
each year. The Company issues new shares for option exercises
and treasury shares for restricted stock awards. At
June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, 2,948,106 and
4,856,459 shares, respectively, were reserved for future
option and restricted stock grants under these stock benefit
plans.
Options of 1,868,163 and 1,959,283, respectively, were
outstanding with alternative vesting methods at June 30,
2006 and December 31, 2005. These shares were fully vested
prior to the implementation of FAS 123R and, as such,
compensation expense for these options is not included in the
Companys consolidated statement of operations for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2006.
The Company utilizes the Black-Scholes option valuation model
for estimating the fair value of its stock options. This model
allows the use of a range of assumptions related to volatility,
the risk-free interest rate, the expected life, and the dividend
yield. The expected volatility utilized in the valuation model
is based on implied volatilities from traded options on the
Companys stock and the historical volatility of the
Companys stock price. The decrease in expected volatility
from the periods ended June 30, 2005 to the periods ended
June 30, 2006 is primarily the result of a lower implied
volatility. The
F-10
dividend yield and the expected holding period are both based on
historical experience and managements estimate of future
events. The risk-free interest rate is derived from the
U.S. Treasury yield curve based on the expected life of the
option, in effect at the time of grant. The fair values of the
Companys stock options are calculated using the following
weighted average assumptions based on the methods described
above for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (no
options were granted during the three months ended June 30,
2006 and 2005):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
Assumptions |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Dividend yield
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
Expected volatility
|
|
|
37.9 |
% |
|
|
43.3 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
Expected holding period
|
|
|
5.6 years |
|
|
|
5.5 years |
|
As a result of the adoption of SFAS 123R, Income from
continuing operations before income taxes was reduced by
$1,028, Income from continuing operations and Net
income were both reduced by $669, and basic and diluted
earnings per share were both reduced by less than $.01 for the
three months ended June 30, 2006. For the six months ended
June 30, 2006, Income from continuing operations before
income taxes was reduced by $2,461, Income from
continuing operations and Net income were both
reduced by $1,600, and basic and diluted earnings per share were
both reduced by $.01.
Results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005
have not been further restated to reflect the impact of
compensation expense for the Companys stock option plans.
If, prior to January 1, 2006, the Company had elected to
recognize compensation expense for its stock option plans, based
on the fair value of awards at the grant dates, Net loss
and Loss per share would have changed for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2005 by the following pro
forma amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
June 30, 2005 | |
|
June 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
Net income (loss), as reported
|
|
$ |
13,837 |
|
|
$ |
(141,058 |
) |
Deduct: Total pro forma stock-based employee compensation
expense determined under fair value based method, net of related
tax expense
|
|
|
(392 |
) |
|
|
(783 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
13,445 |
|
|
$ |
(141,841 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss), as reported
|
|
$ |
.05 |
|
|
$ |
(.46 |
) |
Deduct: Total pro forma stock-based employee compensation
expense determined under fair value based method, net of related
tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma basic loss per share
|
|
$ |
.05 |
|
|
$ |
(.46 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss), as reported
|
|
$ |
.05 |
|
|
$ |
(.45 |
) |
Deduct: Total pro forma stock-based employee compensation
expense determined under fair value based method, net of related
tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma diluted income (loss) per share
|
|
$ |
.05 |
|
|
$ |
(.45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tax benefit associated with this additional compensation
expense would have been $210 and $421 for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2005.
F-11
Prior to the implementation of SFAS 123R, the Company
amortized stock-based compensation cost for employees eligible
to retire over the three-year standard vesting period of the
grants. Upon adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company recognizes
costs on new option grants to such retirement-eligible employees
immediately upon grant, consistent with the retirement vesting
acceleration provisions of these grants. If the Company had
historically computed stock-based compensation cost for these
employees under this accelerated method, $624 or less than
$.01 per diluted share of after-tax compensation cost would
have been accelerated and cumulatively included in the pro forma
expense above through June 30, 2005.
The following table shows a summary of information with respect
to stock option and restricted share compensation for the 2006
periods and restricted share compensation for the 2005 periods,
which are included in the Companys condensed consolidated
statement of operations for those respective periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Six Months | |
|
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total pretax share-based compensation expense included in net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
1,711 |
|
|
$ |
549 |
|
|
$ |
3,856 |
|
|
$ |
996 |
|
Income tax benefit related to share-based compensation included
in net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
710 |
|
|
$ |
192 |
|
|
$ |
1,488 |
|
|
$ |
348 |
|
The following table sets forth stock option activity for the six
months ended June 30, 2006:
(Shares reported in whole numbers)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average | |
|
|
Options | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
24,250,429 |
|
|
$ |
9.21 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,602,800 |
|
|
|
8.24 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(607,830 |
) |
|
|
4.10 |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(22,300 |
) |
|
|
6.88 |
|
Expired
|
|
|
(686,154 |
) |
|
|
18.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2006
|
|
|
24,536,945 |
|
|
$ |
9.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2006
|
|
|
22,002,410 |
|
|
$ |
9.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2006, the aggregate intrinsic value for
stock options outstanding and exercisable was $55,140 and
$53,968, respectively. Set forth below is certain information
related to stock options outstanding and exercisable at
June 30, 2006:
(Shares reported in whole numbers)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Options Exercisable | |
|
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Number | |
|
Average | |
|
Weighted- | |
|
Number | |
|
Weighted- | |
Range of |
|
Outstanding at | |
|
Remaining | |
|
Average | |
|
Exercisable at | |
|
Average | |
Exercise Price |
|
June 30, 2006 | |
|
Contractual Life | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
June 30, 2006 | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$0.00 3.0
|
|
|
0 1,987,110 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
$ |
2.60 |
|
|
|
1,987,110 |
|
|
$ |
2.60 |
|
3.01 4.00
|
|
|
5,520,734 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
|
|
|
5,520,734 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
|
4.01 6.00
|
|
|
4,160,000 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
4.99 |
|
|
|
4,160,000 |
|
|
|
4.99 |
|
6.01 9.00
|
|
|
6,383,667 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
7.11 |
|
|
|
3,849,132 |
|
|
|
6.70 |
|
9.01 15.00
|
|
|
2,898,003 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
13.73 |
|
|
|
2,898,003 |
|
|
|
13.73 |
|
15.01 21.00
|
|
|
2,285,160 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
19.18 |
|
|
|
2,285,160 |
|
|
|
19.18 |
|
21.01 38.00
|
|
|
1,302,271 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
35.06 |
|
|
|
1,302,271 |
|
|
|
35.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.00 38.00
|
|
|
24,536,945 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
9.02 |
|
|
|
22,002,410 |
|
|
$ |
9.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-12
Other information pertaining to option activity during the three
and six months ended June 30 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Weighted average grant-date fair value of stock options granted
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
$ |
3.11 |
|
|
$ |
2.71 |
|
Total fair value of stock options vested
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
$ |
1,987 |
|
|
$ |
6,003 |
|
Total intrinsic value of stock options exercised
|
|
$ |
1,344 |
|
|
$ |
630 |
|
|
$ |
2,456 |
|
|
$ |
3,728 |
|
The Company calculated its historical pool of windfall tax
benefits by comparing the book expense for individual stock
grants and the related tax deduction for options granted after
January 1, 1995. Adjustments were made to exclude windfall
tax benefits that were not realized due to the Companys
net operating loss position. Upon completion of this
calculation, the Company determined an additional paid in
capital pool of $2,140.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, cash
received from the exercise of stock options was $1,183 and
$2,402, respectively. As of June 30, 2006, the unrecognized
compensation expense related to stock options of $5,481 is
expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
1.9 years.
Restricted shares awarded under the Amended 1996 Incentive Plan
were 355,500 in the first six months of 2006 and 498,800 in the
first six months of 2005. The weighted average fair market value
per share at the date of grant for shares granted during the
first six months of 2006 and 2005 was $8.24 and $6.90,
respectively. The fair market value of the stock, as determined
on the grant date, is being amortized and charged to income
(with similar credits to capital in excess of par value)
generally over the average period during which the restrictions
lapse. At June 30, 2006, unrecognized compensation expense
related to restricted shares totaling $4,985, which is recorded
in Capital in excess of par value on the balance sheet,
is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
1.6 years. Prior to the implementation of SFAS 123R,
the Company recorded this compensation as Unrecognized
compensation on the balance sheet. The Company recognized
compensation cost of $683 and $1,395 in the three and six months
ended June 30, 2006 related to the restricted shares of
this Plan. During the three and six months ended June 30,
2005, the Company recognized compensation cost of $549 and $996
related to the restricted shares of this Plan.
Restricted share activity for the six months ended June 30,
2006 was as follows:
(Shares reported in whole numbers)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average | |
|
|
Restricted | |
|
Grant-Date | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Nonvested restricted shares at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
779,850 |
|
|
$ |
6.87 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
355,500 |
|
|
|
8.24 |
|
Vested
|
|
|
(308,867 |
) |
|
|
6.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested restricted shares at June 30, 2006
|
|
|
826,483 |
|
|
$ |
7.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company is authorized to issue 1,000,000 shares of
preferred stock, $1 per share par value. No preferred
shares were issued as of June 30, 2006. At June 30,
2006 and December 31, 2005, 500,000,000 common shares of
$1 par value were authorized. The Company had 292,411,418
and 294,808,872 common shares issued and outstanding, net of
51,956,842 and 48,962,063 common shares held in treasury at par
at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.
F-13
|
|
|
Share Purchase Rights Plan |
The Companys preferred share purchase rights plan declares
a dividend of one preferred share purchase right for each share
of common stock outstanding. The rights are exercisable in the
event certain investors attempt to acquire 20% or more of the
common stock of the Company and entitle the rights holders to
purchase certain securities of the Company or the acquiring
company. The rights, which are redeemable by the Company for
$.01 per right, expire in July 2008 unless otherwise
extended.
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
The components of Accumulated other comprehensive income
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign | |
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
Currency | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Other | |
|
|
Translation | |
|
Gains and | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
|
Adjustment | |
|
Losses | |
|
Income | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
70,499 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
70,499 |
|
|
Activity in 2006
|
|
|
10,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,961 |
|
|
Increase in net unrealized gains associated with
available-for-sale securities of the trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,551 |
|
|
|
27,551 |
|
|
Reclassification of net unrealized gains activity attributable
to the non-controlling interest holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,551 |
) |
|
|
(27,551 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2006
|
|
$ |
81,460 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
81,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated
into U.S. dollars using the current exchange rate. The
U.S. dollar amount that arises from such translation, as
well as exchange gains and losses on intercompany balances of a
long-term investment nature, are included in the cumulative
currency translation adjustments in Accumulated other
comprehensive income. Income taxes are generally not
provided for foreign currency translation. The activity in 2006
primarily reflects fluctuations in the exchange rate of the
Canadian and US dollars.
The components of Comprehensive income (loss) are as follows for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
|
Note 2 | |
|
|
|
Note 2 | |
Comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
25,450 |
|
|
$ |
13,837 |
|
|
$ |
52,376 |
|
|
$ |
(141,058 |
) |
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
11,291 |
|
|
|
(1,428 |
) |
|
|
10,961 |
|
|
|
63,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$ |
36,741 |
|
|
$ |
12,409 |
|
|
$ |
63,337 |
|
|
$ |
(77,185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income for the six months ended
June 30, 2005 includes $71,770 related to the sale of the
Companys operations in Argentina and Uruguay.
The Company, subject to market conditions and normal trading
restrictions, makes purchases in the open market or through
privately negotiated transactions under its stock repurchase
program. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the
Company repurchased 3.4 million shares of common stock at
an aggregate cost of $27,870. During the same period in 2005,
the Company repurchased 26.7 million shares of common stock
at an aggregate cost of $189,809. As of June 30, 2006, the
remaining dollar value of shares authorized to be purchased
under the share repurchase program was approximately $36,720.
F-14
During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company paid
a cash dividend of $7,371 and $7,348 to shareholders of record
at the close of business on January 16, 2006 and
April 15, 2006, respectively. Also in the second quarter of
2006, the Companys Board of Directors approved a cash
dividend of $.025 per common share based on the
Companys first quarter 2006 financial results. At
June 30, 2006, this dividend totaling $7,393 was recorded
in Accounts payable and accrued liabilities and
Capital in excess of par value in the condensed
consolidated balance sheet. Subsequent to June 30, 2006,
this dividend was paid and the Companys Board of Directors
approved another cash dividend of $.025 per common share in
August 2006 based on the Companys second quarter 2006
financial results. This dividend will be paid on
October 31, 2006 to shareholders of record at
October 16, 2006.
Debt as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
|
Note 2 | |
7.2% notes due June 2006
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,698 |
|
6.875% notes due October 2007
|
|
|
13,497 |
|
|
|
13,497 |
|
6.5% notes due March 2008
|
|
|
195,000 |
|
|
|
195,000 |
|
7.7% notes due April 2009
|
|
|
341,635 |
|
|
|
341,635 |
|
7.875% debentures due February 2013
|
|
|
55,627 |
|
|
|
55,627 |
|
6.75% notes due April 2016
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
7.0% notes due June 2017
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
Convertible debentures, maturities through 2013, fixed interest
rates from 4.75% to 5.25%, conversion prices from $13.02 to
$50.00 per share
|
|
|
21,213 |
|
|
|
22,213 |
|
Obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
109,427 |
|
|
|
11,425 |
|
Mortgage notes and other debt, maturities through 2050
|
|
|
27,510 |
|
|
|
29,588 |
|
Unamortized pricing discounts and other
|
|
|
(18,232 |
) |
|
|
(22,482 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
1,295,677 |
|
|
|
1,207,201 |
|
|
Less current maturities
|
|
|
(30,414 |
) |
|
|
(20,716 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$ |
1,265,263 |
|
|
$ |
1,186,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of debt at June 30, 2006 were comprised
primarily of convertible debentures and capital leases. The
Companys consolidated debt had a weighted average interest
rate of 7.23% at June 30, 2006 and 7.11% at
December 31, 2005. Approximately 95% and 99% of the total
debt had a fixed interest rate at June 30, 2006 and
December 31, 2005, respectively.
In the first half of 2006, the Company acquired $108,703 of
transportation equipment utilizing capital leases, of which
$102,322 were classified as operating leases in prior periods.
See additional information regarding these leases in note ten to
these condensed consolidated financial statements.
The Companys bank credit facility matures in August of
2007 and provides a total lending commitment of $200,000,
including a sublimit of $175,000 for letters of credit. The
Company recently commenced negotiations on a new credit
facility. As of June 30, 2006, the Company has no cash
borrowings under the current credit facility, but has used it to
support $51,193 of letters of credit. The
F-15
credit facility provides the Company with flexibility for
acquisitions, dividends, and share repurchases. It is secured by
the stock of the Companys domestic subsidiaries and these
domestic subsidiaries have guaranteed the Companys
indebtedness associated with this credit facility. The
subsidiary guarantee is a guarantee of payment of the
outstanding amount of the total lending commitment. It covers
the term of the credit facility, including extensions of our
letters of credit, and totaled a maximum potential amount of
$51,193 and $54,727 at June 30, 2006 and December 31,
2005, respectively. The credit facility contains certain
financial covenants, including a minimum interest coverage
ratio, a maximum leverage ratio, maximum capital expenditure
limitations, minimum net worth requirements, and certain cash
distribution restrictions. As of June 30, 2006, the Company
was in compliance with all of its debt covenants. Interest rates
for the outstanding borrowings are based on various indices as
determined by the Company. The Company also pays a quarterly fee
on the unused commitment that ranges from 0.25% to 0.50%.
During the second quarter of 2006, the Companys
7.2% notes matured, and the Company made a payment
consisting of $10,698 in principal and $385 in interest to the
debtholders.
In the first quarter of 2005, the Company purchased $7,131
aggregate principal amount of its 7.70% notes due in the
open market. As a result of this transaction, the Company
recognized a loss of $1,207 recorded in Loss on early
extinguishment of debt in its condensed consolidated
statement of operations. In the second quarter of 2005, the
Company purchased an additional $9,500 aggregate principal
amount of its 7.70% notes due 2009, and $304 aggregate
principal amount of its 6.00% notes due 2005 in the open
market. As a result of these transactions, the Company
recognized a loss of $1,252 recorded in Loss on early
extinguishment of debt in its consolidated statement of
operations. Also in the second quarter of 2005, the Company
redeemed $129,978 aggregate principal amount of its
6.875% notes due 2007 and $139,302 aggregate principal
amount of its 7.20% notes due 2006 pursuant to a tender
offer for such notes. These transactions resulted in a loss of
$11,799 recorded in Loss on early extinguishment of debt
in the Companys consolidated statement of operations.
On June 15, 2005, the Company issued $300,000 of senior
unsecured 7.00% notes due June 15, 2017, which pay
interest semi-annually beginning December 15, 2005. The
Company used the net proceeds, together with available cash, to
purchase existing indebtedness pursuant to the tender offer
described in the previous paragraph. The Company is entitled to
redeem the notes at any time by paying a make-whole premium. The
notes are subject to the provisions of the Companys Senior
Indenture dated as of February 1, 1993, as amended, which
includes certain covenants limiting, among other things, the
creation of liens securing indebtedness and sale-leaseback
transactions. Under the terms of the issuance of the
unregistered notes, the Company has an obligation to register
the notes with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). As
these terms have not been met in a timely manner, the Company
incurred an aggregate incremental interest expense of $735 and
$1,435 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006,
respectively.
F-16
The components of net periodic pension plan benefit cost for the
three and six months ended June 30 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
|
Note 2 | |
|
|
|
Note 2 | |
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
|
|
$ |
1,973 |
|
|
$ |
2,028 |
|
|
$ |
3,946 |
|
|
$ |
4,055 |
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
(1,589 |
) |
|
|
(1,807 |
) |
|
|
(2,627 |
) |
|
|
(3,613 |
) |
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,515 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
430 |
|
|
$ |
2,477 |
|
|
$ |
1,411 |
|
|
$ |
3,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys operations are both product based and
geographically based. The Companys reportable segments
include its funeral operations and its cemetery operations and
collectively represent 100% of the Companys revenues.
The Companys reportable segment information is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable | |
|
|
Funeral | |
|
Cemetery | |
|
Segments | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues from external customers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
279,634 |
|
|
$ |
151,711 |
|
|
$ |
431,345 |
|
|
|
2005 (Restated note 2)
|
|
$ |
284,589 |
|
|
$ |
147,253 |
|
|
$ |
431,842 |
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
582,618 |
|
|
$ |
290,525 |
|
|
$ |
873,143 |
|
|
|
2005 (Restated note 2)
|
|
$ |
604,040 |
|
|
$ |
275,244 |
|
|
$ |
879,284 |
|
|
Gross profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
52,430 |
|
|
$ |
30,707 |
|
|
$ |
83,137 |
|
|
|
2005 (Restated note 2)
|
|
$ |
50,709 |
|
|
$ |
22,335 |
|
|
$ |
73,044 |
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
117,826 |
|
|
$ |
52,918 |
|
|
$ |
170,744 |
|
|
|
2005 (Restated note 2)
|
|
$ |
130,835 |
|
|
$ |
40,009 |
|
|
$ |
170,844 |
|
F-17
The following table reconciles gross profit from reportable
segments to the Companys consolidated income from
continuing operations before income taxes and cumulative effect
of accounting change:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
|
Note 2 | |
|
|
|
Note 2 | |
Gross profit from reportable segments
|
|
$ |
83,137 |
|
|
$ |
73,044 |
|
|
$ |
170,744 |
|
|
$ |
170,844 |
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(20,922 |
) |
|
|
(22,485 |
) |
|
|
(42,929 |
) |
|
|
(42,192 |
) |
|
Gains (losses) on dispositions and impairment charges, net
|
|
|
(2,881 |
) |
|
|
4,528 |
|
|
|
(7,391 |
) |
|
|
(1,213 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
59,334 |
|
|
|
55,087 |
|
|
|
120,424 |
|
|
|
127,439 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(26,609 |
) |
|
|
(26,224 |
) |
|
|
(53,337 |
) |
|
|
(51,229 |
) |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,051 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,258 |
) |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
6,782 |
|
|
|
3,894 |
|
|
|
12,763 |
|
|
|
7,950 |
|
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
1,632 |
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
4,046 |
|
|
|
(637 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
$ |
41,139 |
|
|
$ |
20,277 |
|
|
$ |
83,896 |
|
|
$ |
69,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys geographic areas include North America and
Other Foreign. North America includes funeral and cemetery
operations in the United States and Canada. Other Foreign
consists of the Companys operations in Singapore and
Germany. Results from the Companys funeral and cemetery
businesses in Argentina, Uruguay, and Chile, which were sold in
2005, are classified as discontinued operations for all periods
presented. The Company conducts both funeral and cemetery
operations in North America and funeral operations in Other
Foreign geographic areas.
The Companys geographic area information is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
America | |
|
Other Foreign | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues from external customers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
428,291 |
|
|
$ |
3,054 |
|
|
$ |
431,345 |
|
|
|
2005 (Restated note 2)
|
|
$ |
429,076 |
|
|
$ |
2,766 |
|
|
$ |
431,842 |
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
867,181 |
|
|
$ |
5,962 |
|
|
$ |
873,143 |
|
|
|
2005 (Restated note 2)
|
|
$ |
873,253 |
|
|
$ |
6,031 |
|
|
$ |
879,284 |
|
|
Gains (losses) on dispositions and impairment charges, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
(2,881 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2,881 |
) |
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
4,528 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,528 |
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
(7,391 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(7,391 |
) |
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
(1,213 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,213 |
) |
|
F-18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
America | |
|
Other Foreign | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Operating income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
58,662 |
|
|
$ |
672 |
|
|
$ |
59,334 |
|
|
|
2005 (Restated note 2)
|
|
$ |
54,880 |
|
|
$ |
207 |
|
|
$ |
55,087 |
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
119,147 |
|
|
$ |
1,277 |
|
|
$ |
120,424 |
|
|
|
2005 (Restated note 2)
|
|
$ |
126,715 |
|
|
$ |
724 |
|
|
$ |
127,439 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
20,552 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
20,577 |
|
|
|
2005 (Restated note 2)
|
|
$ |
15,761 |
|
|
$ |
118 |
|
|
$ |
15,879 |
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
45,631 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
45,670 |
|
|
|
2005 (Restated note 2)
|
|
$ |
36,339 |
|
|
$ |
186 |
|
|
$ |
36,525 |
|
Depreciation expense related to property, plant, and equipment
totaled $19,415 and $39,431 for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2006, respectively, and $14,780 and $29,931 for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively.
Included in the North America figures above are the following
United States amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
|
Note 2 | |
|
|
|
Note 2 | |
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$ |
399,996 |
|
|
$ |
403,145 |
|
|
$ |
810,478 |
|
|
$ |
819,844 |
|
Operating income
|
|
$ |
53,474 |
|
|
$ |
48,551 |
|
|
$ |
109,469 |
|
|
$ |
113,727 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$ |
18,907 |
|
|
$ |
14,594 |
|
|
$ |
42,381 |
|
|
$ |
33,985 |
|
|
|
9. |
Supplementary Information |
Prior to the fourth quarter of 2005, certain costs, specifically
salaries and facility costs, were allocated based upon each of
the respective segments revenue components within products
and services.
Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company refined its
allocation of the costs described above to more accurately
reflect the cost of products and services for its funeral and
cemetery segments. Such costs are now allocated based on an
hourly factor, which represents the average amount of time spent
by employees when selling or providing products and services to
a consumer. The Company has made appropriate disclosure
reclassifications to prior periods to conform to the current
period presentation and make them comparable. The disclosure
reclassifications made to these prior periods to conform to the
current period presentation have no effect on the Companys
condensed consolidated financial position, results of
operations, or statement of cash flows.
F-19
The detail of revenues and costs and expenses as presented in
the statement of operations is as follows for the three and six
months ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
|
Note 2 | |
|
|
|
Note 2 | |
North America products and services revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
$ |
103,186 |
|
|
$ |
125,851 |
|
|
$ |
223,359 |
|
|
$ |
266,185 |
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
97,324 |
|
|
|
103,397 |
|
|
|
186,776 |
|
|
|
186,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total products
|
|
|
200,510 |
|
|
|
229,248 |
|
|
|
410,135 |
|
|
|
452,350 |
|
|
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
164,631 |
|
|
|
148,271 |
|
|
|
336,551 |
|
|
|
317,469 |
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
46,531 |
|
|
|
34,689 |
|
|
|
87,746 |
|
|
|
70,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total services
|
|
|
211,162 |
|
|
|
182,960 |
|
|
|
424,297 |
|
|
|
388,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America products and services revenues
|
|
|
411,672 |
|
|
|
412,208 |
|
|
|
834,432 |
|
|
|
840,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International revenues
|
|
|
3,054 |
|
|
|
2,766 |
|
|
|
5,962 |
|
|
|
6,031 |
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
16,619 |
|
|
|
16,868 |
|
|
|
32,749 |
|
|
|
32,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$ |
431,345 |
|
|
$ |
431,842 |
|
|
$ |
873,143 |
|
|
$ |
879,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America products and services costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
$ |
47,583 |
|
|
$ |
48,426 |
|
|
$ |
103,683 |
|
|
$ |
101,928 |
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
41,614 |
|
|
|
44,679 |
|
|
|
78,957 |
|
|
|
79,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of products
|
|
|
89,197 |
|
|
|
93,105 |
|
|
|
182,640 |
|
|
|
181,212 |
|
|
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
88,173 |
|
|
|
95,316 |
|
|
|
177,029 |
|
|
|
187,807 |
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
24,136 |
|
|
|
26,162 |
|
|
|
47,613 |
|
|
|
50,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of services
|
|
|
112,309 |
|
|
|
121,478 |
|
|
|
224,642 |
|
|
|
237,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America products and services costs
|
|
|
201,506 |
|
|
|
214,583 |
|
|
|
407,282 |
|
|
|
419,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International costs and expenses
|
|
|
2,382 |
|
|
|
2,559 |
|
|
|
4,685 |
|
|
|
5,307 |
|
Overhead and other expenses
|
|
|
144,320 |
|
|
|
141,656 |
|
|
|
290,432 |
|
|
|
284,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
$ |
348,208 |
|
|
$ |
358,798 |
|
|
$ |
702,399 |
|
|
$ |
708,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
The Companys leases principally relate to funeral home
facilities and transportation equipment. Rental expense for
operating leases was $5,828 and $13,854 for the three months
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $13,203 and
$27,897 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005,
F-20
respectively. As of June 30, 2006, future minimum lease
payments for non-cancelable operating and capital leases
exceeding one year are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating | |
|
Capital | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Remainder of 2006
|
|
$ |
5,972 |
|
|
$ |
14,151 |
|
2007
|
|
|
7,326 |
|
|
|
25,356 |
|
2008
|
|
|
6,867 |
|
|
|
20,926 |
|
2009
|
|
|
6,588 |
|
|
|
16,357 |
|
2010
|
|
|
5,434 |
|
|
|
38,047 |
|
2011 and thereafter
|
|
|
52,611 |
|
|
|
28,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
84,798 |
|
|
|
143,509 |
|
|
Less: Subleases
|
|
|
(1,461 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
83,337 |
|
|
$ |
143,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Interest on capital leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,082 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total principal payable on capital leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
109,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To eliminate the variable interest rate risk in the
Companys operating margins and improve the transparency of
our financial statements, we amended certain of our
transportation lease agreements in the first quarter of 2006.
Based on the amended terms, these leases have been classified as
capital leases as of March 31, 2006 and are presented as
such in the table above. For additional information, see note
six to these condensed consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
Representations and Warranties |
As of June 30, 2006, the Company has contingent obligations
of $32,812 resulting from the Companys international asset
sales and joint venture transactions. In some cases, the Company
has guaranteed certain representations and warranties made in
such disposition transactions with letters of credit or
interest-bearing cash investments. The Company has a $26,338
liability included in Other long-term liabilities related
to these guarantees and interest-bearing cash investments of
$6,474 included in Deferred charges and other assets
collateralizing certain of these contingent obligations as of
June 30, 2006. The Company believes it is remote that it
will ultimately be required to fund to third parties claims
against these representations and warranties above the carrying
value of the liability.
In 2004, the Company disposed of its funeral operations in
France to a newly formed, third party company. As a result of
this sale, the Company recognized $35,768 of contractual
obligations related to representations, warranties, and other
indemnifications in accordance with the provisions of
FIN 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure
Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of
F-21
Indebtedness of Others. During the first six months
of 2006, the Company paid $412 to settle certain tax and
litigation matters. The remaining obligation of $23,725 at
June 30, 2006 represents the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum | |
|
|
|
|
Original | |
|
|
|
Potential Amount | |
|
Carrying | |
|
|
Contractual | |
|
|
|
of Future | |
|
Value as of | |
|
|
Obligation | |
|
Time Limit |
|
Payments | |
|
June 30, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Tax reserve liability
|
|
$ |
18,610 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
2006 30 million |
|
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
Litigation provision
|
|
|
7,765 |
|
|
Until entire resolution of (i) the relevant claims or
(ii) settlement of the claim by the purchaser at the
request of the vendor |
|
|
(1) |
|
|
|
4,332 |
|
Employee litigation provision
|
|
|
6,512 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 (for all claims other than those relating
to tax and social security matters) one month after expiration
of the statutory period of limitations for tax and social
security matters. |
|
|
(2) |
|
|
|
6,512 |
|
VAT taxes
|
|
|
3,882 |
|
|
One month after the expiration of statutory period of limitations |
|
|
(1) |
|
|
|
3,882 |
|
Other
|
|
|
3,381 |
|
|
Until entire resolution of (i) the relevant claims or
(ii) settlement of the claim by the purchaser at the
request of the vendor |
|
|
(2) |
|
|
|
3,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
40,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
28,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Deductible of majority equity owner
|
|
|
(4,382 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,382 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
35,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The potential maximum exposure for these two items combined
is 20 million
or $25,102 at June 30, 2006. |
|
(2) |
The potential maximum exposure for these two items combined
is 40 million
or $50,204 at June 30, 2006. |
The Company is a party to various litigation matters,
investigations, and proceedings. For each of its outstanding
legal matters, the Company evaluates the merits of the case, its
exposure to the matter, possible legal or settlement strategies,
and the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome. The Company
intends to defend itself in the lawsuits described herein,
however, if the Company determines that an unfavorable outcome
is probable and can be reasonably estimated, it establishes the
necessary accruals. Certain insurance policies held by the
Company may reduce cash outflows with respect to an adverse
outcome of certain of these litigation matters. The Company
accrues such insurance recoveries when they become probable of
being paid and can be reasonably estimated.
Conley Investment Counsel v. Service Corporation
International, et. al.;Civil Action
04-MD-1609; In the
United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas,
Houston Division (the 2003 Securities Lawsuit). The 2003
Securities Lawsuit resulted from the transfer and consolidation
by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation of three
lawsuits Edgar Neufeld v. Service
Corporation International, et. al., Cause
No. CV-S-03-1561-HDM-PAL,
in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada
Rujira Srisythemp v. Service Corporation
International, et. al., Cause
No. CV-S-03-1392-LDG-LRL,
in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada;
and Joshua Ackerman v. Service Corporation
F-22
International, et. al. Cause No. 04-CV-20114; in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of
Florida. The 2003 Securities Lawsuit names as defendants the
Company and several of the Companys current and former
executive officers or directors. The 2003 Securities Lawsuit is
a purported class action alleging that the defendants failed to
disclose the unlawful treatment of human remains and gravesites
at two cemeteries in Fort Lauderdale and West Palm Beach,
Florida. Since the action is in its preliminary stages, no
discovery has occurred, and the Company cannot quantify its
ultimate liability, if any, for the payment of damages.
David Hijar v. SCI Texas Funeral Services, Inc., SCI
Funeral Services, Inc., and Service Corporation
International; in the County Court of El Paso, County,
Texas, County Court at Law Number Three, Cause Number
2002-740, with an
interlocutory appeal pending in the El Paso Court of
Appeals,
No. 08-05-00182-CV,
and a mandamus proceeding, which has been denied by the
El Paso Court of Appeals,
No. 08-05-00335-CV
but re-filed in the Texas Supreme Court, No. 06-0385
(collectively, the Hijar Lawsuit). The Hijar Lawsuit involves a
state-wide class action brought on behalf of all persons,
entities, and organizations who purchased funeral services from
the Company or its subsidiaries in Texas at any time since
March 18, 1998. Plaintiffs allege that federal and Texas
funeral related regulations and/or statutes (Rules) required the
Company to disclose its markups on all items obtained from third
parties in connection with funeral service contracts and that
the failure to make certain disclosures of markups resulted in
breach of contract and other legal claims. The Plaintiffs seek
to recover an unspecified amount of monetary damages. The
plaintiffs also seek attorneys fees, costs of court, pre-
and post-judgment interest, and unspecified injunctive and
declaratory relief. The Company denies that the plaintiffs
have standing to sue for violations of the Texas Occupations
Code or the Rules; denies that plaintiffs have standing to sue
for violations under the relevant regulations and statutes;
denies that any breaches of contractual terms occurred; and on
other grounds denies liability on all of the plaintiffs
claims. Finally, the Company denies that the Hijar Lawsuit
satisfies the requirements for class certification.
In May 2004, the trial court heard summary judgment
cross-motions filed by the Company and Plaintiff Hijar (at that
time, the only plaintiff). The trial court granted Hijars
motion for partial summary judgment and denied the
Companys motion. In its partial summary judgment order,
the trial court made certain findings to govern the case,
consistent with its summary judgment ruling. The Companys
request for rehearing was denied.
During the course of the Hijar Lawsuit, the parties have
disputed the proper scope and substance of discovery. Following
briefing by both parties and evidentiary hearings, the trial
court entered three orders against the Company that are the
subject of appellate review: (a) a January 2005 discovery
sanctions order; (b) an April 2005 discovery sanctions
order; and (c) an April 2005 certification order,
certifying a class and two subclasses. On April 29, 2005,
the Company filed an appeal regarding the certification order
and, concurrently with its initial brief in that appeal, filed a
separate mandamus proceeding regarding the sanctions orders. In
the certification appeal the court of appeals heard oral
arguments on April 4, 2006. On July 27, 2006, the
court of appeals issued an opinion holding that the plaintiffs
do not have a private right of action for monetary damages under
the relevant regulations and statutes. The opinion concludes
that the plaintiffs do not have standing to assert their claims
for monetary damages on behalf of themselves or the class. The
court of appeals therefore reversed the trial courts order
certifying a class and remanded the matter back to the trial
court for further handling consistent with the courts
opinion. In the mandamus proceeding, the court of appeals denied
the mandamus petition in January 2006, and denied rehearing on
March 15, 2006. The Company filed a petition for writ of
mandamus in the Supreme Court of Texas, which requested a
response. Plaintiffs filed their response on June 29, 2006.
The Company intends to file a reply in the third quarter of 2006.
Mary Louise Baudino, et. al. v. Service Corporation
International, et. al.; The plaintiffs counsel in the
Hijar Lawsuit initiated an arbitration claim raising similar
issues in California and filed in November 2004 a case styled
Mary Louise Baudino, et. al. v. Service Corporation
International, et. al.; in Los Angeles County Superior
Court; Case No. BC324007 (Baudino Lawsuit). The Baudino
Lawsuit makes claims similar to those made in the Hijar lawsuit.
However, the Baudino Lawsuit seeks a nation-wide class of
plaintiffs. The Baudino Lawsuit is in its early stages and
discovery is in its infancy.
F-23
The Company is a defendant in two related class action antitrust
cases filed in 2005. The first case is Cause No 4:05-CV-03394;
Funeral Consumers Alliance, Inc. v. Service Corporation
International, et. al.; In the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas Houston (Funeral
Consumers Case). This is a purported class action on behalf of
casket consumers throughout the United States alleging that the
Company and several other companies involved in the funeral
industry violated federal antitrust laws and state consumer laws
by engaging in various anti-competitive conduct associated with
the sale of caskets.
The Company is also a defendant in Cause
No. 4:05-CV-03399;
Pioneer Valley Casket, et. al. v. Service Corporation
International, et. al.; In the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas Houston Division
(Pioneer Valley Case). This lawsuit makes the same allegations
as the Funeral Consumers Case and is also brought against
several other companies involved in the funeral industry. Unlike
the Funeral Consumers Case, the Pioneer Valley Case is a
purported class action on behalf of all independent casket
distributors that are in the business or were in the business
any time between July 18, 2001 to the present.
The Company was formerly a defendant in a related class action
lawsuit styled Ralph Lee Fancher v. Service Corporation
International, et. al.; In the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas-Houston Division, and Cause
No. 4:05-CV-00246.
That lawsuit was dismissed in May 2006 upon request by the
plaintiffs.
The Funeral Consumers Case and the Pioneer Valley Case seek
injunctions, unspecified amounts of monetary damages, and treble
damages. In the Funeral Consumers Case, plaintiffs were seeking
the courts permission to add a claim to enjoin the Company
and the Alderwoods Group, Inc. from closing the proposed merger
discussed in note fourteen. On July 31, 2006 the trial
court issued an order denying plaintiffs request to add a
claim to enjoin such proposed merger. Since the litigation is in
its preliminary stages, the Company cannot quantify its ultimate
liability, if any, for the payment of damages.
In addition to the Funeral Consumers Case and the Pioneer Valley
Case, the Company has received Civil Investigative Demands,
dated in August 2005 and February 2006, from the Attorney
General of Maryland on behalf of itself and other state
attorneys general, who have commenced an investigation of
alleged anti-competitive practices in the funeral industry. The
Company has also received similar Civil Investigative Demands
from the Attorneys General of Florida and Connecticut.
The ultimate outcome of the matters described above under the
caption Litigation cannot be determined at this time. The
Company intends to aggressively defend all of the above
lawsuits; however, an adverse decision in one or more of such
matters could have a material adverse effect on the Company, its
financial condition, results of operation, and cash flows.
Basic earnings (loss) per common share (EPS) excludes dilution
and is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding for the period.
Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if
securities or other obligations to issue common stock were
exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the
issuance of common shares that then shared in the Companys
earnings (losses).
F-24
A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic
and diluted EPS computations is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
|
Note 2 | |
|
|
|
Note 2 | |
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of
accounting change basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
25,633 |
|
|
$ |
10,724 |
|
|
$ |
52,614 |
|
|
$ |
42,192 |
|
|
Net income (loss) basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
25,450 |
|
|
$ |
13,837 |
|
|
$ |
52,376 |
|
|
$ |
(141,058 |
) |
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares basic
|
|
|
293,409 |
|
|
|
302,363 |
|
|
|
293,580 |
|
|
|
307,896 |
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
3,981 |
|
|
|
3,970 |
|
|
|
4,063 |
|
|
|
4,028 |
|
|
|
Restricted stock
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares diluted
|
|
|
297,501 |
|
|
|
306,404 |
|
|
|
297,784 |
|
|
|
311,986 |
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of
accounting change per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
.09 |
|
|
$ |
.04 |
|
|
$ |
.18 |
|
|
$ |
.14 |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
.09 |
|
|
$ |
.04 |
|
|
$ |
.18 |
|
|
$ |
.14 |
|
|
Income from discontinued operations per share, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
.01 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
.01 |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
.01 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
.01 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change per share, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(.61 |
) |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(.60 |
) |
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
.09 |
|
|
$ |
.05 |
|
|
$ |
.18 |
|
|
$ |
(.46 |
) |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
.09 |
|
|
$ |
.05 |
|
|
$ |
.18 |
|
|
$ |
(.45 |
) |
|
The computation of diluted EPS excludes outstanding stock
options and convertible debt in certain periods in which the
inclusion of such options and debt would be antidilutive in the
periods presented. Total options and convertible debentures not
currently included in the computation of dilutive EPS are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Six Months | |
|
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Antidilutive options
|
|
|
8,237 |
|
|
|
8,909 |
|
|
|
7,911 |
|
|
|
8,909 |
|
Antidilutive convertible debentures
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
979 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common stock equivalents excluded from Computation
|
|
|
8,870 |
|
|
|
9,888 |
|
|
|
8,557 |
|
|
|
9,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
|
|
12. |
Gains (Losses) on Dispositions and Impairment Charges, Net |
As dispositions occur in the normal course of business, gains or
losses on the sale of such businesses are recognized in the
income statement line item Gains (losses) on dispositions and
impairment charges, net. Additionally, as dispositions occur
pursuant to the Companys ongoing asset sale programs,
adjustments are made through this income statement line item to
reflect the difference between actual proceeds received from the
sale compared to the original impairment estimates.
Gains (losses) on dispositions and impairment charges, net
for the three and six months ended June 30, consist of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Gains on dispositions
|
|
$ |
1,708 |
|
|
$ |
23,919 |
|
|
$ |
3,140 |
|
|
$ |
24,808 |
|
Impairment losses for assets held for sale
|
|
|
(4,589 |
) |
|
|
(21,055 |
) |
|
|
(10,531 |
) |
|
|
(28,173 |
) |
Changes to previously estimated impairment losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2,881 |
) |
|
$ |
4,528 |
|
|
$ |
(7,391 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,213 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. |
Discontinued Operations |
During 2005, the Company disposed of its funeral and cemetery
operations in Argentina and Uruguay and its cemetery operations
in Chile. Accordingly, the operations in these countries are
classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
The results of the Companys discontinued operations for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,527 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,704 |
|
Costs and other expenses
|
|
|
(298 |
) |
|
|
(4,588 |
) |
|
|
(388 |
) |
|
|
(11,435 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(298 |
) |
|
|
3,939 |
|
|
|
(388 |
) |
|
|
6,269 |
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
(826 |
) |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
(1,981 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
|
|
$ |
(183 |
) |
|
$ |
3,113 |
|
|
$ |
(238 |
) |
|
$ |
4,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys current year loss from discontinued
operations is attributable to foreign currency adjustments
related to an income tax receivable of approximately $15,859
denominated in Chilean pesos at December 31, 2005. In June
2006, the Company received a payment totaling $10,958 related to
this receivable. The Company expects to receive the remainder of
the receivable, which totaled approximately $4,451 at
June 30, 2006, in the third quarter of 2006. Currency
fluctuations associated with this receivable resulted in a loss
of $298 and a loss of $388 in the Companys condensed
consolidated statement of operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. The receivable
was fully hedged through June 30, 2006; therefore, the
Company had no foreign exchange rate risk associated with it.
The fair market value hedge was recorded at market value at
December 31, 2005. This hedge expired June 30, 2006.
Gains on the hedge totaling $365 and $456 for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2006, respectively, are included in
Other (expense) income in the Companys condensed
consolidated statement of operations
In the second quarter of 2006, the Company entered into a
definitive agreement to acquire all of the outstanding shares of
Alderwoods Group, Inc. (Alderwoods) for $20.00 per share in
cash. On May 31,
F-26
2006, Alderwoods shareholders voted to approve the acquisition.
Alderwoods operated 579 funeral homes, 72 cemeteries, and 61
combination funeral home and cemetery locations in North America
at June 17, 2006.
This transaction is valued at approximately $1,220,000, which
includes approximately $364,000 of Alderwoods debt. The
Company expects to fund this transaction with at least $500,000
of cash on hand as well as through the utilization of short term
or prepayable debt and long-term senior notes. The Company has
also received a commitment letter from JPMorgan and other
financial institutions for an $850,000 bridge facility.
This acquisition is subject to, among other conditions,
antitrust clearance and approval. As previously disclosed, the
Company and Alderwoods entered into a timing agreement with the
staff of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in
connection with the proposed merger of Alderwoods with and into
a subsidiary of SCI. Additionally, as previously disclosed, each
of SCI and Alderwoods has received second requests
from the FTC, and as a result thereof, the waiting period under
the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976,
during which the parties may not consummate the proposed merger,
has been extended. The parties have recently responded to the
FTCs second request.
As a result of the timing agreement, SCI and Alderwoods expect
to seek to negotiate a consent decree with the FTC, in which
case the proposed merger could close as early as
September 30, 2006. SCI and Alderwoods have agreed that if
the parties are unable to reach agreement on a consent decree
with the FTC, they will not close the proposed merger before
October 30, 2006. In addition, SCI and Alderwoods have
agreed, under a standard provision of a recently adopted FTC
protocol for administering second requests, that if the FTC
challenges the proposed transaction by filing an application for
preliminary injunction in federal court, SCI and Alderwoods,
jointly with the FTC, will propose a scheduling order that
provides for a 60-day
pre-hearing discovery period.
It is currently anticipated that the acquisition will be
completed by the end of 2006; however, there can be no assurance
that the acquisition will be completed by this time or at all.
F-27
MANAGEMENTS REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL
REPORTING
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting
as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Companys
internal control over financial reporting is a process designed
under the supervision of the Companys Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with policies and procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2005. In making this assessment, management
used the criteria described in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this
assessment, management concluded that the Company maintained
effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2005.
Managements assessment of the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2005 has been audited by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm as state in their report included herein.
|
|
|
Managements Consideration of the Restatement |
In coming to the conclusion that our disclosure controls and
procedures and our internal control over financial reporting
were effective as of December 31, 2005, our management
considered, among other things, the control deficiencies related
to the accounting for pensions and leases, which contributed to
the restatement of our previously issued financial statements as
disclosed in note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A. After
reviewing and analyzing the Securities and Exchange
Commissions Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB)
No. 99, Materiality, Accounting Principles
Board Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial
Reporting paragraph 29 and SAB Topic 5-F,
Accounting Changes Not Retroactively Applied Due to
Immateriality, and taking into consideration that
(i) the restatement adjustments did not have a material
impact on the financial statements of any individual prior
interim or annual periods taken as a whole; (ii) the
cumulative impact of the restatement adjustments on
stockholders equity was not material to the financial
statements of prior interim or annual periods; and (iii) we
decided to restate our previously issued financial statements
solely because the aggregate impact of the errors, if recorded
in the Companys second quarter 2006 financial statements,
would have been material, our management concluded that the
control deficiencies that contributed to the restatement of the
prior period financial statements were not material weaknesses.
Furthermore, our management concluded that the control
deficiencies that contributed to the restatement when aggregated
with other deficiencies did not constitute a material weakness.
|
|
|
Remediation Efforts in 2005 |
Management, with the oversight of the Audit Committee, has
addressed all of the material weaknesses identified in previous
periods and has concluded that they were remediated in the
fourth quarter of 2005. Throughout 2005, management reviewed its
plans for remediation of identified material weaknesses and the
status of its assessment of the internal control over financial
reporting with the Audit Committee primarily on a bi-weekly
basis.
The Company implemented a plan to remediate the material
weaknesses related to controls performed at its funeral and
cemetery locations. (Refer to material weaknesses A, D-I
previously disclosed in the December 31, 2004
Form 10-K/A
(Amendment No. 2)). Formal training was implemented at both
the funeral and cemetery locations to train the appropriate
personnel on the responsibilities and importance
F-28
of each location performing the controls to comply with Company
established policies and procedures. The Companys support
centers helped facilitate the execution of this remediation
effort. The Company has over 1,500 funeral and cemetery
locations across the country; therefore, the training effort was
extensive and time-consuming.
The material weakness related to controls over the
reconciliations of preneed funeral and cemetery detailed records
to trust fund assets and corresponding deferred revenue and
non-controlling interest accounts related to preneed funeral and
cemetery activities has been remediated. (Refer to material
weakness B previously disclosed in the December 31, 2004
Form 10-K/A
(Amendment No. 2)). Strict timelines for completion of all
reconciliations have been established as well as the disposition
of any reconciling items identified.
The Company has made substantial improvements to the policies,
procedures, and tools for effective program change management to
remediate the material weaknesses identified in the general
information technology controls over program change management
and controls over the accuracy of preneed funeral trust income
recorded upon the maturity of certain preneed funeral contracts.
(Refer to material weaknesses K and L previously disclosed in
the December 31, 2004
Form 10-K/A
(Amendment No. 2)). The program change tracking process was
improved with the new system implemented in July 2005 which
logically guides a change through the various documentation and
approval requirements necessary for controlled program changes.
Version control software and procedures have been strengthened
and testing templates have been made available. Communications
from management regarding the importance of prudent change
control activities have been strengthened through employee
update meetings, policy issuances, testing guidelines, new
procedures, and training sessions. Reconciliations are conducted
more frequently and new monitoring reports have been developed.
The Company has refined its controls related to the
identification, review and communication of legal accruals to
appropriate accounting personnel within the organization,
including certain members of senior management. (Refer to
material weakness M previously disclosed in the
December 31, 2004
Form 10-K/A
(Amendment No. 2)). The Company has established a
management team (comprised of both legal and financial members)
that meets at least twice quarterly to assess the
appropriateness of the Companys legal accruals and
disclosures based on current legal information. Additionally,
all legal information, including any new asserted or unasserted
claims, is updated at the Companys quarterly Disclosure
Committee meeting held just prior to the filing of the
Companys respective
Form 10-Q or
Form 10-K.
The Company has designed and implemented additional controls to
properly account for the impairment or disposition of assets
related to the sale of certain locations in the proper period
and to write off
covenant-not-to-compete
assets in a timely manner. (Refer to material weakness J
previously disclosed in the December 31, 2004
Form 10-K/A
(Amendment No. 2)). Controls were designed and implemented
to account for any property dispositions in the current period
and brought current to the time of the filing of any quarterly
or annual financial statements. The related gains and losses on
dispositions are reviewed and approved by the Corporate
Development and Real Estate departments for completeness and
accuracy. Additionally, covenant-not-to-complete assets are
reviewed for all sold and closed locations prior to the filing
of the quarterly or annual financial statements.
F-29
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of
Service Corporation International:
We have completed integrated audits of Service Corporation
Internationals 2005 and 2004 consolidated financial
statements and of its internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2005, and an audit of its 2003
consolidated financial statements in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Our opinions, based on our audits, are
presented below.
|
|
|
Consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule |
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in
the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of Service Corporation International and
its subsidiaries (the Company) at December 31,
2005 and 2004, and the results of their operations and their
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2005 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition,
in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the
accompanying index presents fairly, in all material respects,
the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with
the related consolidated financial statements. These financial
statements and financial statement schedule are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with
the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit of financial statements includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
As discussed in note four to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for
direct selling costs related to the acquisition of preneed
funeral and preneed cemetery contracts effective January 1,
2005; the Company changed its method of accounting for variable
interest entities on March 31, 2004; and the Company
changed its method of accounting for gains and losses on pension
plan assets and obligations effective January 1, 2004.
As discussed in note two to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company has restated its consolidated financial
statements as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and for the
years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003.
|
|
|
Internal control over financial reporting |
Also, in our opinion, managements assessment, included in
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting appearing under Item 9A, that the Company
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2005 based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO), is fairly stated, in all material respects,
based on those criteria. Furthermore, in our opinion, the
Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005,
based on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the COSO. The Companys
management is responsible for maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our
responsibility is to express opinions on managements
assessment and on the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We
conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting
in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
F-30
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. An audit of internal control over financial reporting
includes obtaining an understanding of internal control over
financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment,
testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of
internal control, and performing such other procedures as we
consider necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Houston, Texas
March 3, 2006, except for note two to the consolidated
financial statements, as to which the date is August 9,
2006.
F-31
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
1,715,737 |
|
|
$ |
1,831,225 |
|
|
$ |
2,313,177 |
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(1,417,592 |
) |
|
|
(1,501,211 |
) |
|
|
(1,956,967 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profits
|
|
|
298,145 |
|
|
|
330,014 |
|
|
|
356,210 |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(84,834 |
) |
|
|
(130,884 |
) |
|
|
(178,127 |
) |
Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions, net
|
|
|
(26,093 |
) |
|
|
25,797 |
|
|
|
50,677 |
|
Other operating expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,004 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
187,218 |
|
|
|
224,927 |
|
|
|
219,756 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(103,733 |
) |
|
|
(119,293 |
) |
|
|
(139,964 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
16,706 |
|
|
|
13,453 |
|
|
|
6,215 |
|
(Loss) gain on early extinguishment of debt, net
|
|
|
(14,258 |
) |
|
|
(16,770 |
) |
|
|
1,315 |
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
2,774 |
|
|
|
9,703 |
|
|
|
8,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
cumulative effects of accounting changes
|
|
|
88,707 |
|
|
|
112,020 |
|
|
|
95,667 |
|
(Provision) benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
(33,233 |
) |
|
|
7,650 |
|
|
|
(26,402 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effects of
accounting changes
|
|
|
55,474 |
|
|
|
119,670 |
|
|
|
69,265 |
|
Income from discontinued operations (net of income tax
(provision) benefit of $(4,764), $49,175 and $(1,876),
respectively)
|
|
|
4,123 |
|
|
|
41,584 |
|
|
|
15,809 |
|
Cumulative effects of accounting changes (net of income tax
benefit of $117,428 and $22,907, respectively)
|
|
|
(187,538 |
) |
|
|
(50,593 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$ |
(127,941 |
) |
|
$ |
110,661 |
|
|
$ |
85,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effects of
accounting changes
|
|
$ |
.19 |
|
|
$ |
.38 |
|
|
$ |
.23 |
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
.01 |
|
|
|
.13 |
|
|
|
.05 |
|
|
Cumulative effects of accounting changes, net of tax
|
|
|
(.62 |
) |
|
|
(.16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$ |
(.42 |
) |
|
$ |
.35 |
|
|
$ |
.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of shares
|
|
|
302,213 |
|
|
|
318,737 |
|
|
|
299,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effects of
accounting changes
|
|
$ |
.18 |
|
|
$ |
.37 |
|
|
$ |
.23 |
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
.01 |
|
|
|
.12 |
|
|
|
.05 |
|
|
Cumulative effects of accounting changes, net of tax
|
|
|
(.61 |
) |
|
|
(.15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$ |
(.42 |
) |
|
$ |
.34 |
|
|
$ |
.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of shares
|
|
|
306,745 |
|
|
|
344,675 |
|
|
|
300,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per share
|
|
$ |
.10 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to consolidated financial statements)
F-32
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
|
|
(In thousands, except | |
|
|
share amounts) | |
ASSETS |
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
446,782 |
|
|
$ |
287,785 |
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
|
97,747 |
|
|
|
102,622 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
68,327 |
|
|
|
81,526 |
|
|
Current assets of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,085 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
37,527 |
|
|
|
53,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
650,383 |
|
|
|
536,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
1,226,192 |
|
|
|
1,267,784 |
|
|
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
1,288,515 |
|
|
|
1,399,778 |
|
|
Cemetery property, at cost
|
|
|
1,355,654 |
|
|
|
1,509,599 |
|
|
Property and equipment, at cost, net
|
|
|
950,174 |
|
|
|
978,861 |
|
|
Non-current assets of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,367 |
|
|
Deferred charges and other assets
|
|
|
249,581 |
|
|
|
631,839 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,123,888 |
|
|
|
1,169,040 |
|
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments
|
|
|
700,382 |
|
|
|
729,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,544,769 |
|
|
$ |
8,227,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$ |
231,693 |
|
|
$ |
221,235 |
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
20,716 |
|
|
|
78,164 |
|
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,111 |
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
20,359 |
|
|
|
7,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
272,768 |
|
|
|
314,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,186,485 |
|
|
|
1,200,353 |
|
Deferred preneed funeral revenues
|
|
|
535,384 |
|
|
|
540,794 |
|
Deferred preneed cemetery revenues
|
|
|
792,485 |
|
|
|
803,144 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
138,677 |
|
|
|
274,463 |
|
Non-current liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,225 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
326,985 |
|
|
|
437,298 |
|
Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts
|
|
|
2,015,811 |
|
|
|
2,050,658 |
|
Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts
|
|
|
694,619 |
|
|
|
704,912 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (note 13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $1 per share par value,
500,000,000 shares authorized, 294,808,872 and 323,225,352
issued and outstanding (net of 48,962,063 and 18,502,478
treasury shares at par)
|
|
|
294,809 |
|
|
|
323,225 |
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
2,182,745 |
|
|
|
2,395,057 |
|
|
Unearned compensation
|
|
|
(3,593 |
) |
|
|
(2,022 |
) |
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(962,905 |
) |
|
|
(834,964 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
70,499 |
|
|
|
(38,349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,581,555 |
|
|
|
1,842,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,544,769 |
|
|
$ |
8,227,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to consolidated financial statements)
F-33
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$ |
(127,941 |
) |
|
$ |
110,661 |
|
|
$ |
85,074 |
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(4,123 |
) |
|
|
(41,584 |
) |
|
|
(15,809 |
) |
|
|
Loss (gain) on early extinguishments of debt
|
|
|
14,258 |
|
|
|
16,770 |
|
|
|
(1,315 |
) |
|
|
Premiums paid on early extinguishments of debt
|
|
|
(12,186 |
) |
|
|
(13,817 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effects of accounting changes, net of tax
|
|
|
187,538 |
|
|
|
50,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
87,885 |
|
|
|
145,189 |
|
|
|
161,443 |
|
|
|
Provision for deferred income taxes
|
|
|
25,191 |
|
|
|
18,283 |
|
|
|
2,142 |
|
|
|
Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions, net
|
|
|
26,093 |
|
|
|
(25,797 |
) |
|
|
(50,677 |
) |
|
|
Other operating expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,004 |
|
|
|
Payments on restructuring charges
|
|
|
(10,723 |
) |
|
|
(14,000 |
) |
|
|
(14,155 |
) |
|
|
Litigation payments
|
|
|
(3,126 |
) |
|
|
(164,566 |
) |
|
|
(30,782 |
) |
|
|
Change in assets and liabilities, net of effects from
acquisitions and dispositions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in receivables
|
|
|
18,915 |
|
|
|
45,983 |
|
|
|
(59,156 |
) |
|
|
|
Decrease in other assets
|
|
|
43,859 |
|
|
|
5,946 |
|
|
|
68,357 |
|
|
|
|
Increase in litigation accrual
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
60,800 |
|
|
|
99,420 |
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in payables and other liabilities
|
|
|
13,943 |
|
|
|
(54,310 |
) |
|
|
92,407 |
|
|
|
|
Net effect of preneed funeral production and maturities
|
|
|
5,176 |
|
|
|
(20,989 |
) |
|
|
4,061 |
|
|
|
|
Net effect of preneed cemetery production and deliveries
|
|
|
52,981 |
|
|
|
(28,691 |
) |
|
|
2,382 |
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
(1,971 |
) |
|
|
17,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing
operations
|
|
|
318,196 |
|
|
|
88,500 |
|
|
|
370,286 |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities from
discontinued operations
|
|
|
(5,344 |
) |
|
|
5,656 |
|
|
|
3,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
312,852 |
|
|
|
94,156 |
|
|
|
374,259 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(99,416 |
) |
|
|
(95,619 |
) |
|
|
(115,471 |
) |
|
Proceeds from divestitures and sales of property and equipment
|
|
|
111,722 |
|
|
|
57,749 |
|
|
|
76,577 |
|
|
Proceeds from dispositions of foreign operations, net of cash
retained
|
|
|
151,692 |
|
|
|
330,829 |
|
|
|
73,940 |
|
|
Indemnity payments related to the sale of former funeral
operations in France
|
|
|
(2,105 |
) |
|
|
(2,401 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of contingent obligations to former owners of acquired
business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48,749 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net withdrawals (deposits) of restricted funds and other
|
|
|
9,334 |
|
|
|
51,378 |
|
|
|
(71,939 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities from
continuing operations
|
|
|
171,227 |
|
|
|
293,187 |
|
|
|
(36,893 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
(3,663 |
) |
|
|
(529 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
171,015 |
|
|
|
289,524 |
|
|
|
(37,422 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of debt
|
|
|
(85,812 |
) |
|
|
(177,816 |
) |
|
|
(91,131 |
) |
|
Proceeds from long-term debt issued
|
|
|
292,541 |
|
|
|
241,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issue costs
|
|
|
(1,038 |
) |
|
|
(358 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Early extinguishments of debt
|
|
|
(291,277 |
) |
|
|
(299,961 |
) |
|
|
(200,349 |
) |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
7,834 |
|
|
|
10,605 |
|
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
Purchase of Company common stock
|
|
|
(225,152 |
) |
|
|
(110,258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of dividends
|
|
|
(22,637 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(844 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,917 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities from continuing operations
|
|
|
(326,385 |
) |
|
|
(335,986 |
) |
|
|
(300,300 |
) |
Effect of foreign currency
|
|
|
1,515 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
2,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
158,997 |
|
|
|
48,354 |
|
|
|
38,806 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
287,785 |
|
|
|
239,431 |
|
|
|
200,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
446,782 |
|
|
$ |
287,785 |
|
|
$ |
239,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to consolidated financial statements)
F-34
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury | |
|
Capital in | |
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive | |
|
|
|
|
Outstanding | |
|
|
Common | |
|
Stock, Par | |
|
Excess of | |
|
Unearned | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
(Loss) | |
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
Stock | |
|
Value | |
|
Par Value | |
|
Compensation | |
|
Deficit | |
|
Income | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
Balance at December 31, 2002
|
|
|
297,010 |
|
|
|
$ |
299,526 |
|
|
$ |
(2,516 |
) |
|
$ |
2,259,936 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,030,699 |
) |
|
$ |
(207,385 |
) |
|
$ |
1,318,862 |
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,074 |
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,504 |
|
|
|
92,504 |
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,710 |
|
Common Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option exercises and other
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
1,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,380 |
|
|
Contributions to employee 401(k)
|
|
|
4,559 |
|
|
|
|
4,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
302,040 |
|
|
|
|
304,509 |
|
|
|
(2,469 |
) |
|
|
2,274,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(945,625 |
) |
|
|
(114,749 |
) |
|
|
1,516,330 |
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,661 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,242 |
) |
|
|
(9,242 |
) |
|
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,636 |
|
|
|
36,636 |
|
|
|
Reclassification for translation adjustments realized in net
income, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,006 |
|
|
|
49,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,061 |
|
Common Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option exercises and other
|
|
|
2,756 |
|
|
|
|
2,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,162 |
|
|
Tax benefit from stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,482 |
|
|
Contributions to employee 401(k)
|
|
|
2,692 |
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
15,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,127 |
|
|
Debenture conversions
|
|
|
32,034 |
|
|
|
|
32,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,154 |
|
|
Restricted stock award, net of forfeitures
|
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,483 |
|
|
|
(2,911 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
889 |
|
|
Purchase of Company common stock
|
|
|
(16,725 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,725 |
) |
|
|
(93,533 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110,258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
323,225 |
|
|
|
|
341,727 |
|
|
|
(18,502 |
) |
|
|
2,395,057 |
|
|
|
(2,022 |
) |
|
|
(834,964 |
) |
|
|
(38,349 |
) |
|
|
1,842,947 |
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(127,941 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(127,941 |
) |
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,260 |
|
|
|
7,260 |
|
|
|
Reclassification for translation adjustments realized in net
loss, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,588 |
|
|
|
101,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,093 |
) |
Dividends on common stock ($.10 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,052 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,052 |
) |
Common Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option exercises and other
|
|
|
2,044 |
|
|
|
|
2,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,227 |
|
|
Tax benefit from stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,592 |
|
|
Restricted stock award, net of forfeitures
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
3,161 |
|
|
|
(3,657 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,086 |
|
|
Purchase of Company common stock
|
|
|
(30,956 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,956 |
) |
|
|
(194,196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(225,152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
294,809 |
|
|
|
$ |
343,771 |
|
|
$ |
(48,962 |
) |
|
$ |
2,182,745 |
|
|
$ |
(3,593 |
) |
|
$ |
(962,905 |
) |
|
$ |
70,499 |
|
|
$ |
1,581,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to consolidated financial statements)
F-35
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Note One
Nature of Operations
Service Corporation International (SCI or the Company) is a
provider of deathcare products and services, with a network of
funeral service locations and cemeteries operating in the United
States and Canada. The Company owns a 25 percent equity
interest in funeral operations in France. Additionally, the
Company owns Kenyon International Emergency Services
(Kenyon), a wholly owned subsidiary that specializes
in providing disaster management services in mass fatality
incidents. Kenyons revenues are included in the
Companys funeral operations segment.
The funeral service and cemetery operations consist of funeral
service locations, cemeteries, crematoria and related
businesses. Personnel at the funeral service locations provide
all professional services relating to atneed funerals, including
the use of funeral facilities and motor vehicles, and
preparation and embalming services. Funeral related merchandise
(including caskets, burial vaults, cremation receptacles,
flowers and other ancillary products and services) is sold at
funeral service locations. Certain funeral service locations
contain crematoria. The Company sells preneed funeral services
whereby a customer contractually agrees to the terms of a
funeral to be performed in the future. The Companys
cemeteries provide cemetery property interment rights (including
mausoleum spaces, lots and lawn crypts) and sell cemetery
related merchandise (including stone and bronze memorials,
burial vaults, casket and cremation memorialization products)
and services (primarily merchandise installations and burial
openings and closings). Cemetery items are sold on an atneed or
preneed basis. Personnel at cemeteries perform interment
services and provide management and maintenance of cemetery
grounds. Certain cemeteries operate crematoria, and certain
cemeteries contain gardens specifically for the purpose of
cremation memorialization.
Note Two
|
|
|
Restatement of Financial Statements |
The Company has restated herein its previously issued
consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2005
and 2004 and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2005, and its unaudited quarterly financial
data for each of the interim periods of 2005 and 2004. This
restatement corrects errors related to (1) the
miscalculation of the Companys actuarially determined
pension benefit obligation, (2) the accounting for certain
leases related to funeral home properties which were previously
accounted for as operating leases but should have been accounted
for as capital leases, and (3) other out-of-period
adjustments previously identified by the Company but deemed to
be not material either individually or in the aggregate.
All applicable amounts related to this restatement have been
reflected in the Companys consolidated financial
statements and disclosed in the notes to the consolidated
financial statements in this
Form 10-K/A.
|
|
|
Pension Benefit Obligation |
As previously disclosed in the Companys 2004
Form 10-K,
effective January 1, 2004, the Company adopted a new
accounting policy related to the accounting for actuarial gains
and losses in its pension plan. Under the new accounting policy,
the Company began recognizing such actuarial gains and losses in
its consolidated statement of operations as they occurred.
Previously, the Company amortized the difference between actual
and expected investment returns and other actuarial gains and
losses over seven years (except to the extent that settlements
with employees required earlier recognition). As a result of
this accounting change, the Company recognized an after-tax
charge in its 2004 financial statements,
F-36
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
representing the cumulative effect of this accounting change, of
$33,599 ($54,873 before tax). This amount represented the
accumulated unrecognized net losses related to the pension plan
assets and liabilities as of January 1, 2004.
During the second quarter of 2006, the Company discovered that
its actuarially determined pension benefit obligation (PBO) had
been incorrectly calculated for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004, 2003, and 2002 as the impact of
pending lump sum cash settlements in the PBO calculation at the
end of each respective year had been inadvertently omitted. The
net aggregate pre-tax impact of this error over the four-year
period ended December 31, 2005 was $4,233. Had this PBO
calculation been correct at the January 1, 2004 date of the
Companys accounting policy change, the Company would have
recognized an additional cumulative effect of accounting change
of $4,961 ($3,037 after tax) in its December 31, 2004
consolidated statement of operations, as the vast majority of
the impact of previously unrecognized pending lump sum
settlements for 2002 and 2003 would have been recognized in
connection with the accounting policy change.
In addition, the Company identified an actuarial calculation
error that resulted in an understatement of pension expense of
$1,940 in the fourth quarter of 2005.
During the first quarter of 2006, the Company determined that
certain of its leases related to funeral home properties that
were previously accounted for as operating leases should have
been accounted for as capital leases. The aggregate pre-tax
adjustment to the Companys previously reported
consolidated financial statements is $2,677, of which $657
relates to the three years ended December 31, 2005. The
remaining $2,020 relates to periods prior to January 1,
2003.
|
|
|
Other Out-of-Period Adjustments |
The Company has also included in the appropriate periods in its
restated financial statements other adjustments that were
previously identified but deemed to be not material, either
individually or in the aggregate, and therefore had been
initially corrected in a subsequent period. Such adjustments
impacted the timing of expense items, including income tax
expenses previously recorded in the first quarter of 2006. The
cumulative amount of such out-of-period adjustments was a net
aggregate decrease to pre-tax income of $1,079 and an additional
$496 of income tax expense for the year ended December 31,
2005.
The Company evaluated the materiality of these adjustments to
its previously issued interim and annual financial statements,
including its interim financial statements as of and for the
three months ended March 31, 2006. The Company determined
that the impact of these errors was not material to its
previously issued consolidated financial statements; however,
the Company further determined that the cumulative correction of
the errors in the second quarter of 2006 would have been
material to the current period. Therefore, in accordance with
paragraph 29 of Accounting Principles Board Opinion
No. 28 and the SECs Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB)
Topic 5-F, the
Company is restating its previously issued financial statements
to reflect the correction of the errors in each of the periods
affected. As a result, the Company has restated herein its
previously issued consolidated financial statements as of
December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2005, and its unaudited
quarterly financial data for each of the interim periods of 2005
and 2004.
F-37
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The effect of these adjustments on the Companys
consolidated statement of operations for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2005 is detailed below (in
thousands except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
As Reported | |
|
As Restated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
1,715,605 |
|
|
$ |
1,715,737 |
|
Cost and expenses
|
|
|
(1,416,778 |
) |
|
|
(1,417,592 |
) |
Gross profits
|
|
|
298,827 |
|
|
|
298,145 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
187,922 |
|
|
|
187,218 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(102,337 |
) |
|
|
(103,733 |
) |
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
cumulative effects of accounting changes
|
|
|
90,807 |
|
|
|
88,707 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(34,122 |
) |
|
|
(33,233 |
) |
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(126,730 |
) |
|
$ |
(127,941 |
) |
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
(.42 |
) |
|
$ |
(.42 |
) |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
(.41 |
) |
|
$ |
(.42 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended | |
|
For the Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
1,831,225 |
|
|
$ |
1,831,225 |
|
|
$ |
2,313,177 |
|
|
$ |
2,313,177 |
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
$ |
(1,502,696 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,501,211 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,957,392 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,956,967 |
) |
Gross profits
|
|
|
328,529 |
|
|
|
330,014 |
|
|
|
355,785 |
|
|
|
356,210 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
223,430 |
|
|
|
224,927 |
|
|
|
219,353 |
|
|
|
219,756 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(117,910 |
) |
|
|
(119,293 |
) |
|
|
(138,625 |
) |
|
|
(139,964 |
) |
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
cumulative effects of accounting changes
|
|
|
111,906 |
|
|
|
112,020 |
|
|
|
96,603 |
|
|
|
95,667 |
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
|
|
|
8,194 |
|
|
|
7,650 |
|
|
|
(27,347 |
) |
|
|
(26,402 |
) |
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effects of
accounting changes
|
|
|
120,100 |
|
|
|
119,670 |
|
|
|
69,256 |
|
|
|
69,265 |
|
Cumulative effects of accounting changes
|
|
|
(47,556 |
) |
|
|
(50,593 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
114,128 |
|
|
$ |
110,661 |
|
|
$ |
85,065 |
|
|
$ |
85,074 |
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
.36 |
|
|
$ |
.35 |
|
|
$ |
.28 |
|
|
$ |
.28 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
.35 |
|
|
$ |
.34 |
|
|
$ |
.28 |
|
|
$ |
.28 |
|
F-38
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The effect of this restatement on the Companys previously
reported consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2005
and 2004 is set forth below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Selected consolidated balance sheet data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, at cost, net
|
|
$ |
942,229 |
|
|
$ |
950,174 |
|
|
$ |
970,547 |
|
|
$ |
978,861 |
|
|
Deferred charges and other assets
|
|
|
249,449 |
|
|
|
249,581 |
|
|
|
631,839 |
|
|
|
631,839 |
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
7,536,692 |
|
|
|
7,544,769 |
|
|
|
8,218,840 |
|
|
|
8,227,154 |
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
231,129 |
|
|
|
231,693 |
|
|
|
221,877 |
|
|
|
221,235 |
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
20,468 |
|
|
|
20,716 |
|
|
|
77,950 |
|
|
|
78,164 |
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,175,463 |
|
|
|
1,186,485 |
|
|
|
1,189,163 |
|
|
|
1,200,353 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
141,676 |
|
|
|
138,677 |
|
|
|
276,572 |
|
|
|
274,463 |
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
320,812 |
|
|
|
326,985 |
|
|
|
431,917 |
|
|
|
437,298 |
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,588,486 |
|
|
|
1,581,555 |
|
|
|
1,848,667 |
|
|
|
1,842,947 |
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
7,536,692 |
|
|
$ |
7,544,769 |
|
|
$ |
8,218,840 |
|
|
$ |
8,227,154 |
|
The aggregate impact to the Companys accumulated deficit
balance as of January 1, 2003 was an increase of $2,262.
The effect of this restatement on the Companys previously
reported consolidated statement of cash flows for the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2005 is as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
312,658 |
|
|
$ |
312,852 |
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(326,191 |
) |
|
|
(326,385 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
93,988 |
|
|
$ |
94,156 |
|
|
$ |
374,108 |
|
|
$ |
374,259 |
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(335,818 |
) |
|
|
(335,986 |
) |
|
|
(300,149 |
) |
|
|
(300,300 |
) |
Note Three
|
|
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
|
|
|
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation |
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
SCI and all majority-owned subsidiaries. Intercompany balances
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
In 2005, the Company classified cash premiums paid to early
extinguish debt as a component of operating activities. The
Company has reclassified prior periods to conform to this
presentation. For the year ended December 31, 2004, cash
premiums of approximately $13,817 were reclassified from
financing activities to operating activities. No cash premiums
were paid to early extinguish debt during 2003. Certain other
reclassifications have been made to prior years to conform to
current period presentation with no effect on the Companys
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
F-39
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial
Statements |
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that may affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements
and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting
period. As a result, actual results could differ from these
estimates. The Company allocates overhead costs in North America
based on funeral and cemetery reporting unit revenues.
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased
with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash
equivalents. At December 31, 2005, the majority of the
Companys cash was invested in commercial paper.
|
|
|
Accounts Receivables and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
The Companys trade receivables primarily consist of
amounts due for funeral services already performed. The Company
provides various allowances and/or cancellation reserves for its
funeral and cemetery preneed and atneed receivables as well as
for its preneed funeral and preneed cemetery deferred revenues.
These allowances are based on an analysis of historical trends
and include, where applicable, collection and cancellation
activity. Atneed funeral receivables are considered past due
after 30 days. Collections are managed by the locations
until a receivable is 180 days delinquent at which time it
is written off and sent to a collection agency. These estimates
are impacted by a number of factors, including changes in
economy, relocation, and demographic or competitive changes in
the Companys areas of operation.
|
|
|
Inventories and Cemetery Property |
Funeral merchandise and cemetery burial property and merchandise
are stated at the lower of average cost or market. Inventory
costs are primarily relieved using specific identification.
|
|
|
Property and Equipment, Net |
Property and equipment, net are recorded at cost. Maintenance
and repairs are charged to expense whereas renewals and major
replacements that extend the assets useful lives are
capitalized. Depreciation is provided using the straight line
method over the estimated useful lives of the various classes of
assets. Property is depreciated over a period ranging from seven
to forty years, equipment is depreciated over a period from
three to eight years and leasehold improvements are depreciated
over the shorter of the lease term or ten years. Depreciation
expense related to property, plant and equipment totaled
$60,725, $60,800 and $80,432 for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. When
property is sold or retired, the cost and related accumulated
depreciation are removed from the consolidated balance sheet;
resulting gains and losses are included in the consolidated
statement of operations.
The Company has lease arrangements primarily related to funeral
service locations and transportation lease agreements which were
primarily classified as operating leases at December 31,
2005. Lease terms related to funeral home properties generally
range from one to 35 years with options to renew at varying
terms. Lease terms related to transportation agreements
generally range from one to five years with options to renew at
varying terms. The Company calculates operating lease expense
using the straight line method
F-40
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
prescribed by generally accepted accounting principles. The
Company considers reasonably assured renewal options and fixed
escalation provisions in its calculation. For more information
related to leases, see note fourteen to these consolidated
financial statements.
The excess of purchase price over the fair value of identifiable
net assets acquired in business combinations accounted for as
purchases is recorded as goodwill. Goodwill is tested annually
for impairment by assessing the fair value of each of the
Companys reporting units (which is generally one level
below the Companys reportable segments). As of
December 31, 2005, the Companys funeral segment
reporting units include assets in North America, Germany and
Singapore. The Companys cemetery segment reporting unit
includes assets in North America. At December 31, 2005, the
Company no longer has goodwill related to its cemetery segment.
The Companys policy is to test for impairment of goodwill
in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets (SFAS 142) annually as of
September 30 each year. For the current year, the Company
performed this test on September 30, 2005.
The Company tests for impairment of its goodwill using a
two-step approach as prescribed in SFAS 142. The first step
of the Companys goodwill impairment test compares the fair
value of each reporting unit with its carrying amount, including
goodwill. The Company does not record an impairment of goodwill
in instances where the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds
its carrying amount. The second step of the Companys
goodwill impairment test is required only in situations where
the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value
as determined in the first step. In such instances, the Company
compares the implied fair value of goodwill (as defined in
SFAS 142) to its carrying amount of goodwill. If the
carrying amount of reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied
fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in
an amount equal to that excess. Fair market value of a reporting
unit is determined using a calculation based on multiples of
revenue and multiples of EBITDA, or earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization, of both the Company and
its competitors. Based on the Companys impairment tests at
September 30, 2005 and 2004, the Company concluded that
there was no impairment of goodwill in accordance with
SFAS 142. For more information related to goodwill, see
note nine to these consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets |
Except as noted for goodwill, the Company reviews its long-lived
assets for impairment when changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable in
accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
(SFAS 144). SFAS 144 requires that long-lived
assets to be held and used be reported at the lower of carrying
amount or fair value. Assets to be disposed of and assets not
expected to provide any future service potential to the Company
are recorded at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less
estimated cost to sell.
The Company accounts for employee stock-based compensation under
the intrinsic value method. Under the intrinsic value method, no
compensation expense is recognized on stock options if the grant
price equals the market value on the date of grant. All of the
Company stock option grants have been at market value on the
dates of each grant.
F-41
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
If the Company had elected to recognize compensation expense for
its stock option plans, based on the fair value of awards at
their grant dates, net (loss) income and (loss) earnings per
share would have changed for the years ended December 31 to
the following pro forma amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
Net (loss) income, as reported
|
|
$ |
(127,941 |
) |
|
$ |
110,661 |
|
|
$ |
85,074 |
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of
related tax expense
|
|
|
(1,767 |
) |
|
|
(3,220 |
) |
|
|
(6,720 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net (loss) income
|
|
$ |
(129,708 |
) |
|
$ |
107,441 |
|
|
$ |
78,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share, as reported
|
|
$ |
(.42 |
) |
|
$ |
.35 |
|
|
$ |
.28 |
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of
related tax expense
|
|
|
(.01 |
) |
|
|
(.01 |
) |
|
|
(.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma basic (loss) earnings per share
|
|
$ |
(.43 |
) |
|
$ |
.34 |
|
|
$ |
.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share, as reported
|
|
$ |
(.42 |
) |
|
$ |
.34 |
|
|
$ |
.28 |
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of
related tax expense
|
|
|
(.01 |
) |
|
|
(.01 |
) |
|
|
(.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma diluted (loss) earnings per share
|
|
$ |
(.43 |
) |
|
$ |
.33 |
|
|
$ |
.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company utilizes the Black-Scholes option valuation model
for estimating the fair value of its stock options. This model
allows the use of a range of assumptions related to volatility,
the risk-free interest rate, the expected life, and the dividend
yield. Beginning in 2005, the expected volatility utilized in
the valuation model is based on implied volatilities from traded
options on our stock and the historical volatility of our stock
price. Similarly, the dividend yield and the expected holding
period are both based on historical experience and our estimate
of future events. The risk-free interest rate is derived from
the U.S. Treasury yield curve based on the expected life of
the grant in effect at the time of grant. Prior to 2005,
expected volatility was based solely on the historical
volatility of our stock price and the expected holding period
was equal to the life of the option. The fair values of the
Companys stock options are calculated using the following
weighted average assumptions based on the methods described
above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 (1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Dividend yield
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
43.3 |
% |
|
|
63.8 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
Expected holding period
|
|
|
5.5 years |
|
|
|
8.0 years |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Weighted average fair value
|
|
$ |
2.71 |
|
|
$ |
4.68 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
(1) |
The Company did not issue stock options during 2003. |
The Company currently computes stock-based compensation cost for
employees eligible to retire over the three-year standard
vesting period of the grants. Upon adoption of SFAS 123R
Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R), the
Company will amortize new option grants to such
retirement-eligible employees immediately upon grant, consistent
with the retirement vesting acceleration provisions of these
grants. If the Company had historically computed stock-based
compensation cost for these employees
F-42
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
under this accelerated method, $372 or less than $.01 per
diluted share of after-tax compensation cost would have been
accelerated and cumulatively included in the pro forma expense
above through December 31, 2005. The tax benefit associated
with the additional compensation expense discussed above would
have been $200 for the year ended December 31, 2005.
On August 16, 2004, the Company announced a share
repurchase program authorizing the investment of up to $100,000
to purchase its common stock in order to reduce dilution from
shares issued previously and to assist the Company in
maintaining an appropriate capital structure. On
November 10, 2004, February 10, 2005, and
June 23, 2005, the Company announced an increase in the
share repurchase program authorizing the investment of up to an
additional $100,000 to repurchase common stock, for an aggregate
authorized investment of up to $400,000. The Company makes
treasury stock purchases in the open market or through privately
negotiated transactions subject to market conditions and normal
trading restrictions. The Company accounts for the repurchase of
its common stock under the par value method. The Company uses
the average cost method upon the subsequent reissuance of
treasury shares.
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Translation |
All assets and liabilities of the Companys foreign
subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange
rates in effect as of the end of the reporting period. Revenue
and expense items are translated at the average exchange rates
for the reporting period. The resulting translation adjustments
are included in stockholders equity as a component of
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income in the
consolidated statement of stockholders equity.
The functional currency of the Company and its subsidiaries is
the respective local currency. The transactional currency gains
and losses that arise from transactions denominated in
currencies other than the functional currencies of our
operations are recorded in Other income, net in the
consolidated statement of operations. The Company does not
operate in countries which are considered to have
hyperinflationary economies.
Revenue is recognized when the funeral services are performed
and funeral merchandise is delivered. The Companys funeral
trade receivables consist of amounts due for services already
performed and merchandise delivered. An allowance for doubtful
accounts has been provided based on historical experience. The
Company sells price guaranteed preneed funeral contracts through
various programs providing for future funeral services at prices
prevailing when the agreements are signed. Revenues associated
with sales of preneed funeral contracts, which include
accumulated trust earnings, are deferred until such time that
the funeral services are performed. Allowances for customer
cancellations are based upon historical experience. See note
four to the consolidated financial statements regarding preneed
funeral activities.
Pursuant to state or provincial law, all or a portion of the
proceeds from funeral merchandise or services sold on a preneed
basis may be required to be paid into trust funds. The Company
defers investment earnings related to these merchandise and
services trusts until the associated merchandise is delivered or
services are performed.
Revenue associated with sales of cemetery merchandise and
services is recognized when the service is performed or
merchandise is delivered. The Companys cemetery trade
receivables consist of amounts due
F-43
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
for services already performed and merchandise already
delivered. An allowance for doubtful accounts has been provided
based on historical experience. Revenue associated with sales of
preneed cemetery interment rights is recognized in accordance
with the retail land sales provisions of SFAS No. 66,
Accounting for the Sales of Real Estate
(SFAS 66). Under SFAS 66, revenue from constructed
cemetery property is not recognized until a minimum percentage
(10%) of the sales price has been collected. Revenue related to
the preneed sale of unconstructed cemetery property is deferred
until it is constructed and 10% of the sales price is collected.
Revenue associated with sales of preneed merchandise and
services is not recognized until the merchandise is delivered or
the services are performed. Allowances for customer
cancellations for preneed cemetery contracts are based upon
historical experience.
Costs related to the sale of property interment rights include
the property and development costs specifically identified by
project. At the completion of the project, costs are charged to
operations as revenue is recognized. Costs related to sales of
merchandise and services are based on actual costs incurred.
Pursuant to state or provincial law, all or a portion of the
proceeds from cemetery merchandise or services sold on a preneed
basis may be required to be paid into trust funds. The Company
defers investment earnings related to these merchandise and
services trusts until the associated merchandise is delivered or
services are performed.
A portion of the proceeds from the sale of cemetery property
interment rights is required by state or provincial law to be
paid into perpetual care trust funds. Investment earnings from
these trusts are distributed regularly, are recognized in
current cemetery revenues and are intended to defray cemetery
maintenance costs, which are expensed as incurred. The principal
of such perpetual care trust funds generally cannot be withdrawn
by the Company.
See note six to the consolidated financial statements regarding
preneed cemetery activities.
Income taxes are computed using the liability method. Deferred
taxes are provided on all temporary differences between the
financial bases and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. The
Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax
assets when uncertainty regarding their realization exists. The
Company intends to permanently reinvest the unremitted earnings
of certain of its foreign subsidiaries in those businesses
outside the United States and, therefore, has not provided for
deferred federal income taxes on such unremitted foreign
earnings. For more information related to income taxes, see note
ten to the consolidated financial statements.
The Company maintains certain equity interests in international
operations as a result of its strategy to dispose of all or a
majority interest of its international operations outside of
North America. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company
owned a minority investment in certain funeral operations in
France and at December 31, 2003, the Company owned a
minority interest equity investment in operations in the United
Kingdom. The Company accounts for its minority interest equity
investments in accordance with Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 18, The Equity Method of Accounting
for Investments in Common Stock. The Company has not
presented summarized financial information of the investees as
they are not material to the Companys consolidated
financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
F-44
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The names of the Companys investees and the percentage of
ownership are set forth in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership | |
|
Method | |
|
|
|
|
Investee Name | |
|
Percentage | |
|
Accounting | |
|
Date Sold | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Investments held at 12/31/2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
France
|
|
|
AKH Luxco S.C.A. |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
Investments held at 12/31/2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
France
|
|
|
AKH Luxco S.C.A. |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
Investments held at 12/31/2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
Dignity Limited |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
June 2004 |
|
Note Four
|
|
|
New Accounting Pronouncements and Accounting
Changes |
|
|
|
Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments |
In February 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS No. 155, Accounting
for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments an
amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140
(SFAS 155). SFAS 155 amends SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities (SFAS 133), and
SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of
Liabilities (SFAS 140). This statement also
resolves issues addressed in Statement No. 133 Implementation
Issue No. D1, Application of Statement 133 to
Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets.
SFAS 155 permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid
financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that
otherwise would require bifurcation and clarifies which
interest-only strips and principal-only strips are not subject
to the requirements of SFAS 133. SFAS 140 is amended
to eliminate the prohibition on a qualifying special-purpose
entity from holding a derivative financial instrument that
pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative
financial instrument. SFAS 155 is effective for all
financial instruments acquired or issued during fiscal years
beginning after September 15, 2006 (January 1, 2007
for the Company). The Company does not expect this statement to
have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections |
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154,
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections A
Replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement
No. 3 (SFAS 154). SFAS 154 primarily
requires retrospective application to prior period financial
statements for the direct effects of changes in accounting
principles, unless it is impracticable to determine either the
period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change.
SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and
corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2005 (January 1, 2006 for the Company).
The impact of SFAS 154 will depend on the nature and extent
of any voluntary accounting changes or error corrections after
the effective date, but the Company does not expect
SFAS 154 to have a material impact on its consolidated
financial statements.
|
|
|
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments |
In June 2005, the FASB decided not to provide additional
guidance on the meaning of other-than-temporary impairment, and
directed the staff to issue proposed FSP
EITF 03-1-a,
Implementation Guidance for the Application of
Paragraph 16 of EITF Issue
No. 03-1, as
final. The final FSP supersedes EITF Issue
No. 03-1, The
Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application
to Certain
F-45
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Investments, and EITF Topic No. D-44, Recognition
of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment upon the Planned Sale of a
Security Whose Cost Exceeds Fair Value. The final FSP
(retitled FSP FAS 115-1, The Meaning of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain
Investments) replaces the guidance set forth in
paragraphs 10-18 of EITF
Issue 03-1 with
references to existing other-than-temporary impairment guidance.
FSP FAS 115-1 codifies the guidance set forth in EITF Topic
D-44 and clarifies that an investor should recognize an
impairment loss no later than when the impairment is deemed
other-than-temporary, even if a decision to sell has not been
made. FSP FAS 115-1 is effective for other-than-temporary
analysis conducted in periods beginning after December 15,
2005. The Company adopted the provisions of FSP FAS 115-1
as of January 1, 2006 and as of the date of adoption, this
statement had no material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
Effective January 1, 2005, the Company changed its method
of accounting for direct selling costs related to the
acquisition of preneed funeral and preneed cemetery contracts.
Prior to this change, the Company capitalized such direct
selling costs and amortized these deferred selling costs in
proportion to the revenue recognized. Under the new method of
accounting, the Company expenses these direct selling costs as
incurred. The Company believes the new method is preferable
because it better reflects the economics of the Companys
business.
As of January 1, 2005, the Company recorded a cumulative
effect charge of $187,538, net of tax of $117,428. This amount
represents the cumulative balance of deferred selling costs
recorded on the Companys consolidated balance sheet in
Deferred charges and other assets at the time of the
accounting change. If the Company had not changed its method of
accounting for direct selling costs as described above, net
income for the year ended December 31, 2005 would have been
approximately $10,470 or $.03 per basic and diluted share
higher than currently reported.
The pro forma amounts for years ended December 31, 2004 and
2003 in the table below reflect the new policy to expense
selling costs as incurred. The effect of the change for the
years ended December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003
would have decreased net income from continuing operations
before cumulative effects of accounting changes by approximately
$9,403 and $6,535, or $.03 and $.02 per diluted share,
respectively.
F-46
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Deferred | |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling | |
|
|
|
|
|
Selling | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs, Net | |
|
|
|
|
|
Costs, Net | |
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
(1) | |
|
Pro forma | |
|
Historical | |
|
(1) | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
note 2 | |
|
|
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
|
|
|
note 2 | |
Gross profits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
$ |
227,812 |
|
|
$ |
(4,735 |
) |
|
$ |
223,077 |
|
|
$ |
273,764 |
|
|
$ |
(4,245 |
) |
|
$ |
269,519 |
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
102,202 |
|
|
|
(9,533 |
) |
|
|
92,669 |
|
|
|
82,446 |
|
|
|
(6,416 |
) |
|
|
76,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330,014 |
|
|
|
(14,268 |
) |
|
|
315,746 |
|
|
|
356,210 |
|
|
|
(10,661 |
) |
|
|
345,549 |
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and
cumulative effects of accounting changes
|
|
$ |
112,020 |
|
|
$ |
(14,268 |
) |
|
$ |
97,752 |
|
|
$ |
95,667 |
|
|
$ |
(10,661 |
) |
|
$ |
85,006 |
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
110,661 |
|
|
$ |
(9,403 |
) |
|
$ |
101,258 |
|
|
$ |
85,074 |
|
|
$ |
(6,535 |
) |
|
$ |
78,539 |
|
Amounts per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) basic
|
|
$ |
.35 |
|
|
$ |
(.03 |
) |
|
$ |
.32 |
|
|
$ |
.28 |
|
|
$ |
(.02 |
) |
|
$ |
.26 |
|
|
Net income (loss) diluted
|
|
$ |
.34 |
|
|
$ |
(.03 |
) |
|
$ |
.31 |
|
|
$ |
.28 |
|
|
$ |
(.02 |
) |
|
$ |
.26 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents net deferred selling costs that would have been
expensed under the new method of accounting adopted on
January 1, 2005. |
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
Inventory Costs an amendment of ARB 43,
Chapter 4 (SFAS 151). SFAS 151 amends
the guidance in Accounting Research Bulletin
(ARB) No. 43, Chapter 4, Inventory
Pricing, to clarify the accounting for abnormal
amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and
wasted material. SFAS 151 requires that those items be
recognized as current-period charges, rather than as a portion
of the inventory cost. In addition, SFAS 151 requires that
allocation of fixed production overhead to the costs of
conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production
facilities. SFAS 151 is effective for inventory costs
incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005.
The Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS 151 as of
January 1, 2006 and as of the date of adoption, this
statement had no material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash
flows.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 123R. SFAS 123R
is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB Opinion
No. 25 Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees. Among other items, SFAS 123R
eliminates the use of the intrinsic value method of accounting,
and requires companies to recognize in the statement of
operations the cost of employee services received in exchange
for awards of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair
value of those awards. The Company will continue to utilize the
Black-Scholes option pricing model to measure the fair value of
its stock options. The Company has adopted SFAS 123R on
January 1, 2006 and will use the modified-prospective
transition method. The Company has calculated its historical
pool of windfall tax benefits by comparing the book expense for
individual stock grants and the related tax deduction for
options granted after January 1, 1995. Additionally,
adjustments were made to exclude windfall tax benefits which
were not realized due to the Companys net operating loss
position. The Company has completed this calculation and has
determined an additional paid in capital pool of approximately
$2,100.
F-47
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The adoption of SFAS 123R is expected to negatively impact
the Companys after-tax earnings by approximately $2,600 or
$.01 per diluted share for the year ended December 31,
2006.
Under the modified-prospective method, the Company will
recognize compensation expense in its consolidated financial
statements issued subsequent to the date of adoption for all
share-based payments granted, modified or settled after
December 31, 2005, as well as for any awards that were
granted prior to December 31, 2005 for which requisite
service will be provided after December 31, 2005. The
compensation expense on awards granted prior to
December 31, 2005 will be recognized using the fair values
determined for the pro forma disclosures on stock-based
compensation included in prior filings. The amount of
compensation expense that will be recognized on awards that have
not fully vested will exclude the compensation expense
cumulatively recognized in the pro forma disclosures on
stock-based compensation. See note fifteen to the consolidated
financial statements for further information on the
Companys stock-based compensation plans.
|
|
|
Variable Interest Entities |
In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46. This
interpretation clarifies the application of ARB No. 51,
Consolidated Financial Statements, to certain
entities in which equity investors do not have the
characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not
have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its
activities without additional subordinated financial support
from other parties. In December 2003, the FASB revised
FIN 46.
Under the provisions of FIN 46R, the Company is required to
consolidate certain cemeteries and trust assets. Merchandise and
service trusts and cemetery perpetual care trusts are considered
variable interest entities because the trusts meet the
conditions of paragraphs 5(a) and 5(b)(1) of FIN 46R.
That is, as a group, the equity investors (if any) do not have
sufficient equity at risk and do not have the direct or indirect
ability through voting or similar rights to make decisions about
the trusts activities that have a significant effect on
the success of the trusts. FIN 46R requires the Company to
consolidate merchandise and service trusts and cemetery
perpetual care trusts for which the Company is the primary
beneficiary (i.e., those for which the Company absorbs a
majority of the trusts expected losses). The Company is
the primary beneficiary of a trust whenever a majority of the
assets of the trust are attributable to deposits of customers of
the Company.
The Company implemented FIN 46R as of March 31, 2004.
Prior to the implementation, the Company operated certain
cemeteries in Michigan which the Company managed but did not
own. During the Companys evaluation of FIN 46R, the
Company evaluated these cemeteries to determine whether such
cemeteries were within the scope of FIN 46R. The investment
capital of these cemeteries was financed by the Company in
exchange for a long-term sales, accounting, and cash management
agreement. In accordance with this agreement, the Company
receives the majority of the cash flows from these cemeteries.
Additionally, the Company absorbs the majority of these
cemeteries expected losses and receives a majority of the
cemeteries residual returns. As a result, the Company
concluded that it was the primary beneficiary of these
cemeteries and that the long-term sales, accounting, and cash
management agreement is a variable interest as defined by
FIN 46R. Given the circumstances above, the Company
consolidated such cemeteries as of March 31, 2004. The
Company recognized an after tax charge of $13,957, representing
the cumulative effect of an accounting change, as a result of
consolidating these cemeteries. The results of operations and
cash flows of these cemeteries are included in the
Companys consolidated statements of operations and cash
flows beginning March 31, 2004. Excluding the cumulative
effect of accounting change, the effect of consolidating these
entities did not have a significant impact on the Companys
reported results of operations.
F-48
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Effective January 1, 2004, the Company changed its
accounting for gains and losses on its pension plan assets and
obligations. The Company now recognizes pension gains and losses
in its consolidated statement of operations as such gains and
losses are incurred. Prior to January 1, 2004, the Company
amortized the difference between actual and expected investment
returns and actuarial gains and losses over seven years (except
to the extent that settlements with employees required earlier
recognition). The Company believes the new method of accounting
better reflects the economic nature of its pension plans and
recognizes gains and losses on the pension plan assets and
liabilities in the year the gains or losses occur. As a result
of this accounting change, the Company recognized a cumulative
effect charge of $36,636 (net of tax) as of January 1,
2004. This amount represented accumulated unrecognized net
losses related to the pension plan assets and liabilities. Under
the new accounting policy, the Company records net pension
expense or income reflecting estimated returns on plan assets
and obligations for its interim financial statements, and
recognizes actual gains and losses on plan assets and
obligations for the full-year (annual) financial statements as
actuarial information becomes available upon review of the
annual remeasurement. See note sixteen to these consolidated
financial statements for additional information on pensions.
Note Five
|
|
|
Preneed Funeral Activities |
|
|
|
Preneed Funeral Receivables and Trust Investments |
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments, net of
allowance for cancellation, represent trust investments and
customer receivables related to unperformed, price-guaranteed
trust funded preneed funeral contracts. When the Company, which
is the primary beneficiary, receives payments from the customer,
the Company deposits the amount required by law into the trust
and reclassifies the corresponding amount from Deferred
preneed funeral revenues into Non-controlling interest in
funeral and cemetery trusts. The Company deposited $71,961
and $46,822 into and withdrew $97,086 and $65,208 from trusts
during the year ended December 31, 2005 and the nine months
ended December 31, 2004 (the period in 2004 subsequent to
the adoption of FIN 46R), respectively.
The components of Preneed funeral receivables and trust
investments in the Companys consolidated balance sheet
at December 31 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Trust investments, at market
|
|
$ |
1,046,958 |
|
|
$ |
1,085,777 |
|
Receivables from customers
|
|
|
204,180 |
|
|
|
196,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,251,138 |
|
|
|
1,282,016 |
|
|
Allowance for cancellation
|
|
|
(24,946 |
) |
|
|
(14,232 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments
|
|
$ |
1,226,192 |
|
|
$ |
1,267,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An allowance for contract cancellation is provided based on
historical experience. Upon cancellation of a trust funded
preneed funeral contract, a customer is generally entitled to
receive a refund of the funds held in trust. In many
jurisdictions, the Company may be obligated to fund any
shortfall if the amounts deposited by the customer exceed the
funds in trust including investment income. Therefore, when
realized or unrealized losses of a trust result in trust funded
preneed funeral contracts being under-funded, the Company
assesses such contracts to determine whether a loss provision
should be recorded. No such loss amounts were required to be
recognized as of December 31, 2005 or 2004.
F-49
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accumulated investment earnings from trust investments have been
included to the extent that they have been accrued through
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Preneed
funeral receivables and trust investments are reduced by the
trust investment earnings (realized and unrealized) that the
Company has been allowed to withdraw in certain states prior to
death maturity and by amounts received from customers that are
not required to be deposited into trust, pursuant to various
state laws. These earnings are recorded in Deferred preneed
funeral revenues until the service is performed or the
merchandise is delivered.
The activity in Preneed funeral receivables and trust
investments for the years ended December 31 is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Beginning balance Preneed funeral receivables and
trust investments
|
|
$ |
1,267,784 |
|
|
$ |
1,080,108 |
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
132,157 |
|
|
|
104,259 |
|
|
Cash receipts from customers
|
|
|
(109,879 |
) |
|
|
(94,522 |
) |
|
Deposits to trust
|
|
|
71,961 |
|
|
|
67,527 |
|
|
Dispositions of businesses
|
|
|
(17,257 |
) |
|
|
(9,323 |
) |
|
Net undistributed investment earnings
|
|
|
27,140 |
|
|
|
39,479 |
|
|
Maturities and distributed earnings
|
|
|
(131,651 |
) |
|
|
(122,212 |
) |
|
Change in cancellation allowance
|
|
|
(10,714 |
) |
|
|
2,593 |
|
|
Sale of debt associated with certain trust investments
|
|
|
(31,800 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Adoption of FIN 46R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,964 |
|
|
Trust reconciliation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,280 |
) |
|
Effect of foreign currency and other
|
|
|
28,451 |
|
|
|
(23,809 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance Preneed funeral receivables and trust
investments
|
|
$ |
1,226,192 |
|
|
$ |
1,267,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cost and market values associated with funeral trust
investments at December 31, 2005 and 2004 are detailed
below. Cost reflects the investment (net of redemptions) of
control holders in common trust funds, mutual funds and private
equity investments. Fair market value represents the value of
the underlying securities or cash held by the common trust
funds, mutual funds at published values and the estimated market
value of private equity investments (including debt as well as
the estimated fair value related to the contract holders
equity in majority-owned real estate investments). The fair
market value of funeral trust investments was based primarily on
quoted market prices at December 31, 2005 and 2004. The
Company periodically evaluates investments for
other-than-temporary impairment. As a result of its most recent
reviews at December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company recorded
adjustments to cost of $0 and $15,176, respectively, for the
unrealized losses related to certain private equity and other
investments. The adjustment to cost in 2004 is included in
realized losses in Other income, net and is offset by a
corresponding amount in the interest expense related to
non-controlling interest in funeral trust investments, which is
also included in Other income, net. See note eight to the
consolidated financial statements for further information
related to non-controlling interest in funeral trust investments.
F-50
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair Market | |
|
|
Cost | |
|
Gains | |
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
61,369 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
61,369 |
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
93,152 |
|
|
|
2,675 |
|
|
|
(988 |
) |
|
|
94,839 |
|
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
81,842 |
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
(616 |
) |
|
|
81,692 |
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
7,749 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
7,945 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
89,971 |
|
|
|
3,312 |
|
|
|
(1,238 |
) |
|
|
92,045 |
|
|
Insurance-backed
|
|
|
207,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207,887 |
|
|
Asset-backed and other
|
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
889 |
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
299,118 |
|
|
|
13,818 |
|
|
|
(4,157 |
) |
|
|
308,779 |
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
69,070 |
|
|
|
10,322 |
|
|
|
(772 |
) |
|
|
78,620 |
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
83,030 |
|
|
|
1,474 |
|
|
|
(1,259 |
) |
|
|
83,245 |
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
39,006 |
|
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
(9,999 |
) |
|
|
29,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust investments
|
|
$ |
1,033,063 |
|
|
$ |
33,003 |
|
|
$ |
(19,108 |
) |
|
$ |
1,046,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market value as of a percentage of cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair Market | |
|
|
Cost | |
|
Gains | |
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
57,730 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
57,730 |
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
86,694 |
|
|
|
2,883 |
|
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
89,386 |
|
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
73,073 |
|
|
|
1,238 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
74,274 |
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
9,585 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
10,054 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
125,144 |
|
|
|
5,740 |
|
|
|
(414 |
) |
|
|
130,470 |
|
|
Insurance-backed
|
|
|
195,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195,981 |
|
|
Asset-backed and other
|
|
|
3,179 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
3,320 |
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
275,569 |
|
|
|
13,510 |
|
|
|
(1,003 |
) |
|
|
288,076 |
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
112,332 |
|
|
|
12,195 |
|
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
|
124,240 |
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
50,237 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
50,513 |
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
57,633 |
|
|
|
4,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust investments
|
|
$ |
1,047,157 |
|
|
$ |
40,738 |
|
|
$ |
(2,118 |
) |
|
$ |
1,085,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market value as of a percentage of cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-51
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company has determined that unrealized losses in the funeral
trust investments at both December 31, 2005 and 2004 are
considered temporary in nature, as the unrealized losses were
due to temporary fluctuations in interest rates and equity
prices. We believe that none of the securities are permanently
impaired based on an analysis of the investments as well as
discussions with trustees, money managers and consultants. The
Companys funeral trust investment unrealized losses, their
durations and their fair market value as of December 31,
2005, are shown in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months | |
|
Greater than 12 Months | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Fair | |
|
|
|
Fair | |
|
|
|
Fair | |
|
|
|
|
Market | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Market | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Market | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
|
Value | |
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
|
Losses | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
$ |
1,837 |
|
|
$ |
(32 |
) |
|
$ |
25,990 |
|
|
$ |
(956 |
) |
|
$ |
27,827 |
|
|
$ |
(988 |
) |
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
8,351 |
|
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
20,496 |
|
|
|
(374 |
) |
|
|
28,847 |
|
|
|
(616 |
) |
|
Corporate
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
2,169 |
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
2,431 |
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
2,084 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
32,960 |
|
|
|
(1,200 |
) |
|
|
35,044 |
|
|
|
(1,238 |
) |
|
Asset-backed and other
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
6,750 |
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
105,764 |
|
|
|
(4,032 |
) |
|
|
112,514 |
|
|
|
(4,157 |
) |
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
1,920 |
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
16,295 |
|
|
|
(699 |
) |
|
|
18,215 |
|
|
|
(772 |
) |
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
3,839 |
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
51,819 |
|
|
|
(1,177 |
) |
|
|
55,658 |
|
|
|
(1,259 |
) |
Private equity and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,608 |
|
|
|
(9,999 |
) |
|
|
26,608 |
|
|
|
(9,999 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities
|
|
$ |
25,064 |
|
|
$ |
(595 |
) |
|
$ |
282,416 |
|
|
$ |
(18,513 |
) |
|
$ |
307,480 |
|
|
$ |
(19,108 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity dates of the fixed income securities range from 2006 to
2065. Maturities of fixed income securities at December 31,
2005 are estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market | |
|
|
| |
Due in one year or less
|
|
$ |
63,154 |
|
Due in one to five years
|
|
|
104,963 |
|
Due in five to ten years
|
|
|
81,159 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
236,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
485,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2005, purchases and
sales of available-for-sale securities included in trust
investments were $835,022 and $1,035,795, respectively. These
sale transactions resulted in $56,560 and $19,503 of realized
gains and realized losses, respectively, for the year ended
December 31, 2005. During the nine months ended
December 31, 2004 (the period in 2004 subsequent to the
adoption of FIN 46R), purchases and sales of
available-for-sale securities included in trust investments were
$951,663 and $1,019,075, respectively. These sale transactions
resulted in $89,500 and $56,852 of realized gains and realized
losses, respectively for the nine months ended December 31,
2004. The Company uses the first in, first out
(FIFO) method to determine the cost of funeral trust
available-for-sale securities sold during the period.
Earnings from these trust investments are recognized in current
funeral revenues when the service is performed, merchandise is
delivered, or upon cancellation for the amount the Company is
entitled to
F-52
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
retain. Recognized earnings (realized and unrealized) related to
these trust investments were $37,791, $35,477 and $25,487 for
the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003,
respectively.
|
|
|
Deferred Preneed Funeral Revenues |
At December 31, 2005 and 2004, Deferred preneed funeral
revenues, net of allowance for cancellation, represent
future funeral service revenues, including distributed trust
investment earnings associated with unperformed trust funded
preneed funeral contracts that are not held in trust accounts.
Future funeral service revenues and net trust investment
earnings that are held in trust accounts are included in
Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts.
The following table summarizes the activity in Deferred
preneed funeral revenues for the years ended
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Beginning balance Deferred preneed funeral revenues,
net
|
|
$ |
540,794 |
|
|
$ |
1,464,218 |
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
129,459 |
|
|
|
97,611 |
|
|
Dispositions of businesses
|
|
|
(18,253 |
) |
|
|
(19,014 |
) |
|
Net investment earnings
|
|
|
22,783 |
|
|
|
37,219 |
|
|
Recognized deferred preneed revenues
|
|
|
(157,861 |
) |
|
|
(138,820 |
) |
|
Change in cancellation allowance
|
|
|
(5,539 |
) |
|
|
(6,179 |
) |
|
Change in non-controlling interest
|
|
|
8,167 |
|
|
|
179,459 |
|
|
Effect of foreign currency and other
|
|
|
15,834 |
|
|
|
(28,547 |
) |
|
Adoption of FIN 46R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,045,153 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance Deferred preneed funeral revenues, net
|
|
$ |
535,384 |
|
|
$ |
540,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance Funded Preneed Funeral Contracts |
Not included in the consolidated balance sheet are insurance
funded preneed funeral contracts that will be funded by life
insurance or annuity contracts issued by third party insurers.
Prior to the adoption of FIN 46R on March 31, 2004,
the net amount of these contracts was included in Preneed
funeral receivables and trust investments with a
corresponding liability in Deferred preneed funeral
revenues. The proceeds of the life insurance policies or
annuity contracts will be reflected in funeral revenues as these
funerals are performed by the Company.
Note Six
|
|
|
Preneed Cemetery Activities |
|
|
|
Preneed Cemetery Receivables and Trust Investments |
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments, net
of allowance for cancellation, represent trust investments and
customer receivables (net of unearned finance charges) for
contracts sold in advance of when the property interment rights,
merchandise or services are needed. When the Company, which is
the primary beneficiary, receives payments from the customer,
the Company deposits the amount required by law into the trust,
removes the corresponding amount from Deferred preneed
cemetery revenues, and records the amount in to
Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts.
The Company deposited $114,303 and $104,250 into and withdrew
$128,196 and $90,864 from the trusts during the year ended
December 31, 2005 and the nine months ended
December 31, 2004 (the period in 2004 subsequent to the
adoption of FIN 46R), respectively.
F-53
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of Preneed cemetery receivables and trust
investments in the consolidated balance sheet at
December 31, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Trust investments, at market
|
|
$ |
982,755 |
|
|
$ |
1,030,429 |
|
Receivables from customers
|
|
|
406,087 |
|
|
|
483,945 |
|
Unearned finance charges
|
|
|
(64,915 |
) |
|
|
(75,488 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,323,927 |
|
|
|
1,438,886 |
|
Allowance for cancellation
|
|
|
(35,412 |
) |
|
|
(39,108 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments
|
|
$ |
1,288,515 |
|
|
$ |
1,399,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The activity in Preneed cemetery receivables and trust
investments for the years ended December 31 is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Beginning balance Preneed cemetery receivables and
trust investments
|
|
$ |
1,399,778 |
|
|
$ |
1,068,216 |
|
Net sales including deferred and recognized revenue
|
|
|
334,615 |
|
|
|
337,710 |
|
Dispositions of businesses
|
|
|
(65,112 |
) |
|
|
(21,531 |
) |
Net investment earnings
|
|
|
27,229 |
|
|
|
32,869 |
|
Cash receipts from customers, net of refunds
|
|
|
(368,234 |
) |
|
|
(385,350 |
) |
Deposits to trust
|
|
|
114,303 |
|
|
|
128,536 |
|
Maturities, deliveries and associated earnings
|
|
|
(128,196 |
) |
|
|
(120,216 |
) |
Change in cancellation allowance
|
|
|
3,696 |
|
|
|
17,772 |
|
Sale of debt associated with certain trust investments
|
|
|
(27,367 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Adoption of FIN 46R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
323,803 |
|
Effect of foreign currency and other
|
|
|
(2,197 |
) |
|
|
17,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance Preneed cemetery receivables and
trust investments
|
|
$ |
1,288,515 |
|
|
$ |
1,399,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cost and market values associated with the cemetery
merchandise and service trust investments at December 31,
2005 and 2004 are detailed below.
Cost reflects the investment (net of redemptions) of control
holders in common trust funds, mutual funds and private equity
investments. Fair market value represents the value of the
underlying securities or cash held by the common trust funds,
mutual funds at published values and the estimated market value
of private equity investments (including debt as well as the
estimated fair value related to the contract holders
equity in majority-owned real estate alternative investments).
The fair market value of cemetery trust investments was based
primarily on quoted market prices at December 31, 2005 and
2004. The Company periodically evaluates investments for
other-than-temporary impairment. As a result of its most recent
reviews at December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company recorded
adjustments to cost of $0 and $11,928, respectively, for the
unrealized losses related to certain private equity and other
investments. The adjustment to cost in 2004 is included in
realized losses included in Other income, net and is
offset by a corresponding amount in the interest expense related
to non-controlling interest in cemetery trust
F-54
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
investments, which is also included in Other income, net.
See note eight to the consolidated financial statements for
further information related to non-controlling interest in
cemetery trust investments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair Market | |
|
|
Cost | |
|
Gains | |
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
89,493 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
89,493 |
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
121,291 |
|
|
|
6,928 |
|
|
|
(1,030 |
) |
|
|
127,189 |
|
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
21,456 |
|
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
22,325 |
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
13,171 |
|
|
|
766 |
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
13,823 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
173,214 |
|
|
|
10,023 |
|
|
|
(1,534 |
) |
|
|
181,703 |
|
|
Asset-backed and other
|
|
|
2,329 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
2,445 |
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
286,325 |
|
|
|
19,623 |
|
|
|
(2,530 |
) |
|
|
303,418 |
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
133,817 |
|
|
|
22,124 |
|
|
|
(822 |
) |
|
|
155,119 |
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
65,921 |
|
|
|
2,002 |
|
|
|
(1,021 |
) |
|
|
66,902 |
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
27,581 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(7,247 |
) |
|
|
20,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust investments
|
|
$ |
934,598 |
|
|
$ |
62,505 |
|
|
$ |
(14,348 |
) |
|
$ |
982,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market value as a percentage of cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair Market | |
|
|
Cost | |
|
Gains | |
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
123,311 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
123,311 |
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
91,189 |
|
|
|
7,944 |
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
99,040 |
|
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
14,970 |
|
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,863 |
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
13,072 |
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
14,135 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
191,283 |
|
|
|
16,732 |
|
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
207,800 |
|
|
Asset-backed and other
|
|
|
20,320 |
|
|
|
1,806 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
22,105 |
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
253,340 |
|
|
|
24,048 |
|
|
|
(322 |
) |
|
|
277,066 |
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
153,364 |
|
|
|
20,886 |
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
174,143 |
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
46,525 |
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
(316 |
) |
|
|
47,487 |
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
46,125 |
|
|
|
3,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust investments
|
|
$ |
953,499 |
|
|
$ |
78,017 |
|
|
$ |
(1,087 |
) |
|
$ |
1,030,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market value as a percentage of cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-55
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company has determined that unrealized losses in the
cemetery trust investments are considered temporary in nature,
as the unrealized losses were due to temporary fluctuations in
interest rates and equity prices. We believe that none of the
securities are permanently impaired based on an analysis of the
investments as well as discussions with trustees, money managers
and consultants. The Companys cemetery trust investment
unrealized losses, their durations and their fair market value
as of December 31, 2005, are shown in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months | |
|
Greater than 12 Months | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Fair Market | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair Market | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair Market | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
|
Value | |
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
|
Losses | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
$ |
4,441 |
|
|
$ |
(94 |
) |
|
$ |
36,039 |
|
|
$ |
(936 |
) |
|
$ |
40,480 |
|
|
$ |
(1,030 |
) |
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,881 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
2,881 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
Corporate
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
3,986 |
|
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
4,532 |
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
6,619 |
|
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
53,605 |
|
|
|
(1,396 |
) |
|
|
60,224 |
|
|
|
(1,534 |
) |
|
Asset-backed and other
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
10,502 |
|
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
85,628 |
|
|
|
(2,308 |
) |
|
|
96,130 |
|
|
|
(2,530 |
) |
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
3,349 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
22,420 |
|
|
|
(765 |
) |
|
|
25,769 |
|
|
|
(822 |
) |
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
5,602 |
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
36,189 |
|
|
|
(914 |
) |
|
|
41,791 |
|
|
|
(1,021 |
) |
Private equity and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,816 |
|
|
|
(7,247 |
) |
|
|
19,816 |
|
|
|
(7,247 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities
|
|
$ |
31,146 |
|
|
$ |
(631 |
) |
|
$ |
261,272 |
|
|
$ |
(13,717 |
) |
|
$ |
292,418 |
|
|
$ |
(14,348 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity dates of the fixed income securities range from 2006 to
2065. Maturities of fixed income securities at December 31,
2005 are estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market | |
|
|
| |
Due in one year or less.
|
|
$ |
4,351 |
|
Due in one to five years
|
|
|
95,314 |
|
Due in five to ten years
|
|
|
71,269 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
176,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
347,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2005, purchases and
sales of available-for-sale securities included in trust
investments were $915,958 and $1,037,601, respectively. These
sale transactions resulted in $67,732 and $21,506 of realized
gains and realized losses, respectively, for the year ended
December 31, 2005. During the nine months ended
December 31, 2004 (the period in 2004 subsequent to the
adoption of FIN 46R), purchases and sales of
available-for-sale securities included in trust investments were
$837,867 and $829,290, respectively. These sale transactions
resulted in $80,987 and $62,368 of realized gains and realized
losses, respectively for the nine months ended December 31,
2004. The Company uses the FIFO method to determine the cost of
cemetery trust available-for-sale securities sold during the
period.
Earnings from these trust investments are recognized in current
cemetery revenues when the service is performed or the
merchandise is delivered or upon cancellation for the amount the
Company is entitled to retain. Recognized earnings (realized and
unrealized) related to these trust investments were $13,035,
$7,949 and $9,358 for the years ended December 31, 2005,
2004 and 2003, respectively.
F-56
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
Deferred Preneed Cemetery Revenues |
At December 31, 2005 and 2004, Deferred preneed cemetery
revenues, net of allowance for cancellation, represent
future cemetery revenues, including distributed trust investment
earnings associated with unperformed trust funded preneed
cemetery contracts that are not held in trust accounts. Future
cemetery revenues and net trust investment earnings that are
held in trust accounts are included in Non-controlling
interest in funeral and cemetery trusts.
The following table summarizes the activity in Deferred
preneed cemetery revenues for the years ended
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Beginning balance Deferred preneed cemetery revenues
|
|
$ |
803,144 |
|
|
$ |
1,551,187 |
|
|
Net preneed and atneed deferred sales
|
|
|
308,202 |
|
|
|
256,635 |
|
|
Dispositions of businesses
|
|
|
(68,378 |
) |
|
|
(17,636 |
) |
|
Net investment earnings
|
|
|
27,260 |
|
|
|
35,748 |
|
|
Recognized deferred preneed revenues
|
|
|
(315,663 |
) |
|
|
(269,771 |
) |
|
Change in cancellation allowance
|
|
|
6,140 |
|
|
|
(12,946 |
) |
|
Change in non-controlling interest
|
|
|
27,889 |
|
|
|
(74,902 |
) |
|
Effect of foreign currency and other
|
|
|
3,891 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
Adoption of FIN 46R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(665,142 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance Deferred preneed cemetery revenues
|
|
$ |
792,485 |
|
|
$ |
803,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note Seven
|
|
|
Cemetery Perpetual Care Trusts |
The Company, which is the primary beneficiary, is required by
state or provincial law to pay into perpetual care trusts a
portion of the proceeds from the sale of cemetery property
interment rights. As a result of the implementation of
FIN 46R, the Company has consolidated the perpetual care
trust investments with a corresponding amount recorded as
Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts. The
Company deposited $21,303 and $16,118 into trusts and withdrew
$28,075 and $24,506 from trusts during the year ended
December 31, 2005 and the nine months ended
December 31, 2004 (the period in 2004 subsequent to the
adoption of FIN 46R), respectively.
The cost and market values associated with trust investments
held in perpetual care trusts at December 31, 2005 and 2004
are detailed below. Cost reflects the investment (net of
redemptions) of control holders in common trust funds, mutual
funds and private equity investments. Fair market value
represents the value of the underlying securities or cash held
by the common trust funds, mutual funds at published values and
the estimated market value of private equity investments
(including debt as well as the estimated fair value related to
the contract holders equity in majority-owned real estate
investments). The fair market value of perpetual care trusts was
based primarily on quoted market prices at December 31,
2005 and 2004. The Company periodically evaluates investments
for other-than-temporary impairments. As a result of its most
recent reviews at December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company
did not record an adjustment to cost for the year ended
December 31, 2005 and recorded an adjustment to cost of
$1,072 for the year ended December 31, 2004, for the
unrealized losses related to certain private equity and other
investments. The adjustment to cost in 2004 is included in
realized losses included in Other income, net and is
offset by a corresponding amount in the interest expense related
to non-controlling interest in perpetual care trust investments,
which is also included in Other income, net. See note
seven to
F-57
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the consolidated financial statements for further information
related to non-controlling interest in perpetual care trust
investments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair Market | |
|
|
Cost | |
|
Gains | |
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
45,647 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
45,647 |
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
63,102 |
|
|
|
1,953 |
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
64,977 |
|
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
32,456 |
|
|
|
1,373 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
33,788 |
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
71,642 |
|
|
|
1,716 |
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
73,280 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
117,626 |
|
|
|
2,817 |
|
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
120,312 |
|
|
Asset-backed and other
|
|
|
26,992 |
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
27,610 |
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
12,833 |
|
|
|
1,253 |
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
14,021 |
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
90,160 |
|
|
|
3,984 |
|
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
93,933 |
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
43,204 |
|
|
|
2,353 |
|
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
|
45,351 |
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
144,294 |
|
|
|
2,815 |
|
|
|
(1,023 |
) |
|
|
146,086 |
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
31,041 |
|
|
|
5,428 |
|
|
|
(1,092 |
) |
|
|
35,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perpetual care trust investments
|
|
$ |
678,997 |
|
|
$ |
24,340 |
|
|
$ |
(2,955 |
) |
|
$ |
700,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market value as a percentage of cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair Market | |
|
|
Cost | |
|
Gains | |
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
33,444 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
33,444 |
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
25,688 |
|
|
|
1,764 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
27,451 |
|
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
30,265 |
|
|
|
1,666 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
31,926 |
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
87,425 |
|
|
|
4,592 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
92,015 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
131,541 |
|
|
|
6,988 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
138,527 |
|
|
Asset-backed and other
|
|
|
40,757 |
|
|
|
2,166 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
42,922 |
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
13,208 |
|
|
|
1,210 |
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
14,375 |
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
93,748 |
|
|
|
6,544 |
|
|
|
(171 |
) |
|
|
100,121 |
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
43,843 |
|
|
|
3,088 |
|
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
46,772 |
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
145,428 |
|
|
|
6,266 |
|
|
|
(448 |
) |
|
|
151,246 |
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
48,542 |
|
|
|
2,116 |
|
|
|
(409 |
) |
|
|
50,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perpetual care trust investments
|
|
$ |
693,889 |
|
|
$ |
36,400 |
|
|
$ |
(1,241 |
) |
|
$ |
729,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market value as a percentage of cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-58
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company has determined that unrealized losses in the
perpetual care trust investments are considered temporary in
nature, as the unrealized losses were due to temporary
fluctuations in interest rates and equity prices. We believe
that none of the securities are permanently impaired based on an
analysis of the investments as well as discussions with
trustees, money managers and consultants. The Companys
perpetual care trust investment unrealized losses, their
durations and fair market values as of December 31, 2005,
are shown in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months | |
|
Greater Than 12 Months | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Fair | |
|
|
|
Fair | |
|
|
|
Fair | |
|
|
|
|
Market | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Market | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Market | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
|
Value | |
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
|
Losses | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
$ |
1,202 |
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
12,581 |
|
|
$ |
(69 |
) |
|
$ |
13,783 |
|
|
$ |
(78 |
) |
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,518 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
5,518 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
Corporate
|
|
|
1,367 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
13,452 |
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
14,819 |
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
2,225 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
22,121 |
|
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
24,346 |
|
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
Asset-backed and other
|
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
5,044 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
5,550 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
1,204 |
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
Common stock
|
|
|
1,769 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
18,016 |
|
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
19,785 |
|
|
|
(211 |
) |
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
7,699 |
|
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
8,585 |
|
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
6,066 |
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
48,790 |
|
|
|
(942 |
) |
|
|
54,856 |
|
|
|
(1,023 |
) |
Private equity and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,666 |
|
|
|
(1,092 |
) |
|
|
4,666 |
|
|
|
(1,092 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities
|
|
$ |
14,126 |
|
|
$ |
(139 |
) |
|
$ |
138,986 |
|
|
$ |
(2,816 |
) |
|
$ |
153,112 |
|
|
$ |
(2,955 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity dates of the fixed income securities range from 2006 to
2065. Maturities of fixed income securities at December 31,
2005 are estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market | |
|
|
| |
Due in one year or less.
|
|
|
9,687 |
|
Due in one to five years
|
|
|
92,146 |
|
Due in five to ten years
|
|
|
38,594 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
179,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
319,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2005, purchases and
sales of available-for-sale securities in the perpetual care
trust were $919,979 and $970,276, respectively. These sale
transactions resulted in $19,088 and $9,718 of realized gains
and realized losses, respectively. During the nine months ended
December 31, 2004 (the period in 2004 subsequent to the
adoption of FIN 46R), purchases and sales of
available-for-sale securities in the perpetual care trusts were
$754,446 and $771,791, respectively. These sales transactions
resulted in $34,430 and $9,092 of realized gains and realized
losses, respectively. The Company uses the FIFO method to
determine the cost of perpetual care trusts available-for-sale
securities sold during the period.
Distributable earnings from these perpetual care trust
investments are recognized in current cemetery revenues to the
extent of qualifying cemetery maintenance costs. Recognized
earnings related to these
F-59
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
perpetual care trust investments were $26,385, $32,519, and
$31,018 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and
2003, respectively.
Note Eight
|
|
|
Non-Controlling Interest in Funeral and Cemetery Trusts
and in Perpetual Care Trusts |
|
|
|
Non-Controlling Interest in Funeral and Cemetery Trusts |
Effective March 31, 2004, the Company consolidated the
merchandise and service trusts associated with its preneed
funeral and cemetery activities as a result of the
implementation of FIN 46R. Although FIN 46R requires
the consolidation of the merchandise and service trusts, it does
not change the legal relationships among the trusts, the Company
and its customers. The customers are the legal beneficiaries of
these merchandise and service trusts, and therefore, their
interests in these trusts represent a non-controlling interest
in subsidiaries.
|
|
|
Non-Controlling Interest in Perpetual Care Trusts |
The Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts
reflected in the consolidated balance sheet represents the
cemetery perpetual care trusts, net of the accrued expenses and
other long-term liabilities of the perpetual care trusts.
The components of Non-controlling interest in funeral and
cemetery trusts and Non-controlling interest in perpetual
care trusts in the Companys consolidated balance sheet
at December 31, 2005 and 2004 are detailed below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Preneed | |
|
Preneed | |
|
|
|
Cemetery | |
|
|
Funeral | |
|
Cemetery | |
|
Total | |
|
Perpetual Care | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Trust investments, at market value
|
|
$ |
1,046,958 |
|
|
$ |
982,755 |
|
|
$ |
2,029,713 |
|
|
$ |
700,382 |
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued trust operating payables, deferred taxes and other
|
|
|
5,054 |
|
|
|
8,848 |
|
|
|
13,902 |
|
|
|
5,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest
|
|
$ |
1,041,904 |
|
|
$ |
973,907 |
|
|
$ |
2,015,811 |
|
|
$ |
694,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Preneed | |
|
Preneed | |
|
|
|
Cemetery | |
|
|
Funeral | |
|
Cemetery | |
|
Total | |
|
Perpetual Care | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Trust investments, at market value
|
|
$ |
1,085,777 |
|
|
$ |
1,030,429 |
|
|
$ |
2,116,206 |
|
|
$ |
729,048 |
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt associated with certain trust investments
|
|
|
31,800 |
|
|
|
27,367 |
|
|
|
59,167 |
|
|
|
17,759 |
|
|
Accrued trust operating payables, deferred taxes and other
|
|
|
3,906 |
|
|
|
2,475 |
|
|
|
6,381 |
|
|
|
6,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,706 |
|
|
|
29,842 |
|
|
|
65,548 |
|
|
|
24,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest
|
|
$ |
1,050,071 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,587 |
|
|
$ |
2,050,658 |
|
|
$ |
704,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-60
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
Debt Associated with Certain Trusts Consolidated by the
Company |
Certain trusts consolidated with the adoption of FIN 46R
and recorded in Preneed funeral receivables and trust
investments, Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments
and Cemetery perpetual care trust investments have
indirect interests in real estate partnerships. These
partnerships have incurred indebtedness of $0 and $76,926 that
is included in Other liabilities in the consolidated
balance sheet at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
The partnerships paid off their respective indebtedness in 2005
when the related real estate properties were sold.
The components of Other income, net in the Companys
consolidated statement of operations for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004 are detailed below. See notes
four through seven to the consolidated financial statements for
further discussion of the amounts related to the funeral,
cemetery and perpetual care trusts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Funeral | |
|
Cemetery | |
|
Cemetery Perpetual | |
|
|
|
|
Trusts | |
|
Trusts | |
|
Care Trusts | |
|
Other, Net(1) | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Realized gains
|
|
$ |
56,560 |
|
|
$ |
67,732 |
|
|
$ |
19,088 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
143,380 |
|
Realized losses
|
|
|
(19,503 |
) |
|
|
(21,506 |
) |
|
|
(9,718 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,727 |
) |
Interest, dividend and other ordinary income
|
|
|
19,894 |
|
|
|
23,458 |
|
|
|
29,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,351 |
|
Trust expenses and income taxes
|
|
|
(11,924 |
) |
|
|
(13,419 |
) |
|
|
(8,650 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,993 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net trust investment income
|
|
|
45,027 |
|
|
|
56,265 |
|
|
|
30,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,011 |
|
Interest expense related to non-controlling interest in funeral
and cemetery trust investments
|
|
|
(45,027 |
) |
|
|
(56,265 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101,292 |
) |
Interest expense related to non-controlling interest in
perpetual care trust investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,719 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,719 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-controlling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,774 |
|
|
|
2,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income, net
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,774 |
|
|
$ |
2,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-61
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Funeral | |
|
Cemetery | |
|
Cemetery Perpetual | |
|
|
|
|
Trusts | |
|
Trusts | |
|
Care Trusts | |
|
Other, Net (1) | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Realized gains
|
|
$ |
89,500 |
|
|
$ |
80,987 |
|
|
$ |
34,430 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
204,917 |
|
Realized losses
|
|
|
(56,852 |
) |
|
|
(62,368 |
) |
|
|
(9,092 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(128,312 |
) |
Interest, dividend and other ordinary income
|
|
|
13,709 |
|
|
|
18,622 |
|
|
|
26,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,787 |
|
Trust expenses and income taxes
|
|
|
(5,775 |
) |
|
|
(7,422 |
) |
|
|
(7,282 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net trust investment income
|
|
|
40,582 |
|
|
|
29,819 |
|
|
|
44,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,913 |
|
Interest expense related to non-controlling interest in funeral
and cemetery trust investments
|
|
|
(40,582 |
) |
|
|
(29,819 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70,401 |
) |
Interest expense related to non-controlling interest in
perpetual care trust investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,512 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,512 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-controlling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,703 |
|
|
|
9,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income, net
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,703 |
|
|
$ |
9,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Amounts included in other income within Other income, net
primarily relate to foreign currency gains and losses, and
override commissions from a third party insurance company. |
Note Nine
The changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill for the
Companys funeral and cemetery segments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral | |
|
Cemetery | |
|
|
|
|
Segment | |
|
Segment | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance as of December 31, 2003
|
|
$ |
1,193,138 |
|
|
$ |
2,284 |
|
|
$ |
1,195,422 |
|
|
Addition of Goodwill related to acquisitions
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
Reduction of Goodwill related to dispositions
|
|
|
(34,887 |
) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(35,014 |
) |
|
Effect of foreign currency and other
|
|
|
6,564 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
6,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
1,166,657 |
|
|
$ |
2,383 |
|
|
$ |
1,169,040 |
|
|
Reduction of Goodwill related to dispositions
|
|
|
(46,785 |
) |
|
|
(2,507 |
) |
|
|
(49,292 |
) |
|
Effect of foreign currency and other
|
|
|
4,016 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
4,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
1,123,888 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,123,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note Ten
The provision or benefit for income taxes includes
U.S. federal income taxes, determined on a consolidated
return basis, foreign, state and local income taxes.
F-62
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
cumulative effects of accounting changes for the years ended
December 31 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
United States
|
|
$ |
71,311 |
|
|
$ |
66,155 |
|
|
$ |
4,829 |
|
Foreign
|
|
|
17,396 |
|
|
|
45,865 |
|
|
|
90,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
88,707 |
|
|
$ |
112,020 |
|
|
$ |
95,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit) for the years ended
December 31 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$ |
2,328 |
|
|
$ |
(27,916 |
) |
|
$ |
2,050 |
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
2,244 |
|
|
|
2,769 |
|
|
|
17,904 |
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
3,470 |
|
|
|
(786 |
) |
|
|
4,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,042 |
|
|
$ |
(25,933 |
) |
|
$ |
24,260 |
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$ |
38,128 |
|
|
$ |
10,662 |
|
|
$ |
332 |
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
6,041 |
|
|
|
10,311 |
|
|
|
6,913 |
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
(18,978 |
) |
|
|
(2,690 |
) |
|
|
(5,103 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,191 |
|
|
$ |
18,283 |
|
|
$ |
2,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33,233 |
|
|
$ |
(7,650 |
) |
|
$ |
26,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company made income tax payments on continuing operations of
approximately $6,618, $10,761 and $14,462 excluding income tax
refunds of $29,488, $2,566 and $97,724 for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Net tax
refunds of $22,870 in 2005 include a one-time refund of
approximately $29,033 related to a federal ten-year carryback
claim. Net tax (payments) refunds in years 2004 and 2003 of
$(8,195) and $83,262 include one-time refunds of approximately
$1,372 and $950 related to losses on sales of investments and
one-time refunds of approximately $0 and $93,569 related to a
federal net operating carryback claim.
F-63
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The differences between the U.S. federal statutory income
tax rate and the Companys effective tax rate for the years
ended December 31 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
Computed tax provision at the applicable federal statutory
income tax rate
|
|
$ |
31,048 |
|
|
$ |
39,207 |
|
|
$ |
33,483 |
|
State and local taxes, net of federal income tax benefits
|
|
|
(10,081 |
) |
|
|
(2,259 |
) |
|
|
(518 |
) |
Dividends received deduction and tax exempt interest
|
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
(588 |
) |
|
|
(471 |
) |
Foreign jurisdiction differences
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
(1,346 |
) |
|
|
(2,679 |
) |
Write down of assets and other losses with no tax benefit
|
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
(6,915 |
) |
|
|
119 |
|
Tax provision (benefit) associated with dispositions
|
|
|
11,799 |
|
|
|
(34,297 |
) |
|
|
(3,350 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
(481 |
) |
|
|
(1,452 |
) |
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
$ |
33,233 |
|
|
$ |
(7,650 |
) |
|
$ |
26,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total effective tax rate
|
|
|
37.5 |
% |
|
|
(6.8 |
)% |
|
|
27.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes are determined based on differences between the
financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and
are measured using the enacted marginal tax rates. The tax
effects of temporary differences and carry-forwards that give
rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and
liabilities as of December 31 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
Inventories and cemetery property, principally due to purchase
accounting adjustments
|
|
$ |
382,391 |
|
|
$ |
402,811 |
|
Property and equipment, principally related to book-tax
differences in depreciation methods and purchase accounting
adjustments
|
|
|
33,724 |
|
|
|
27,040 |
|
Goodwill, principally related to book-tax differences in
amortization methods
|
|
|
40,541 |
|
|
|
38,566 |
|
Receivables, principally due to sales of cemetery interment
rights and related products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,626 |
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
456,656 |
|
|
|
547,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue on preneed funeral and cemetery contracts,
principally due to earnings from trust funds
|
|
|
(147,764 |
) |
|
|
(111,764 |
) |
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(14,771 |
) |
|
|
(70,713 |
) |
Receivables, principally due to sales of cemetery interment
rights and related products
|
|
|
(27,123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(27,642 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loss and tax credit carry-forwards
|
|
|
(126,364 |
) |
|
|
(141,431 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
(343,664 |
) |
|
|
(323,908 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
34,829 |
|
|
|
43,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
$ |
147,821 |
|
|
$ |
267,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in components related to Receivables and Deferred
revenues in the preceding table primarily relates to the
cumulative effect of accounting change for deferred selling
costs. Additionally,
F-64
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
certain deferred tax liabilities related to our ability to
utilize U.S. Federal operating loss carry-forwards have
been reclassified from their respective individual components to
directly reduce the related loss carry-forward deferred tax
asset with no change to net deferred income taxes. This
reclassification was made to the current and prior year amounts
to assist in comparability. The 2005 decrease in valuation
allowance is due to a $1,712 increase in valuation on tax losses
in foreign jurisdictions, a $920 decrease in valuation on
federal losses, and a $9,871 decrease in valuation allowance on
state operating losses. At December 31, 2005, the loss and
credit carryforward tax assets and associated valuation
allowances by jurisdiction are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal | |
|
State | |
|
Foreign | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Loss and tax credit carryforwards
|
|
$ |
(51,325 |
) |
|
$ |
(67,588 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,451 |
) |
|
$ |
(126,364 |
) |
Valuation allowance
|
|
$ |
2,621 |
|
|
$ |
27,125 |
|
|
$ |
5,083 |
|
|
$ |
34,829 |
|
Current refundable income taxes and current deferred tax assets
are included in Other current assets in the
Companys consolidated balance sheet. Current taxes payable
and current deferred tax liabilities represent Income taxes
payable in the Companys consolidated balance sheet and
long-term tax liabilities are included in Other liabilities
in the Companys consolidated balance sheet. The
Company has tax receivables of $17,321 and $30,461 at
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The Company has
long-term tax liabilities of $104,981 at December 31, 2005
and 2004. See note seventeen to these consolidated financial
statements for further information.
At December 31, 2005 and 2004, U.S. income taxes had
not been provided on $34,628 and $77,112, respectively, of the
remaining undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries since
it is the Companys intent not to remit these earnings. The
Company intends to permanently reinvest these undistributed
foreign earnings in those businesses outside the United States
and, therefore, has not provided for U.S. income taxes on
such earnings. The $77,112 at December 31, 2004 included
$55,505 of undistributed earnings of the Chilean operations that
were sold in September 2005.
A number of years may elapse before particular tax matters, for
which the Company has established accruals, are audited and
finally resolved. The number of tax years with open tax audits
varies depending on the tax jurisdiction. In the United States,
the Internal Revenue Service is currently examining the
Companys tax returns for 1999 through 2002 and various
state jurisdictions are auditing years through 2004. While it is
often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of
resolution of any particular tax matter, the Company believes
that its accruals reflect the probable outcome of known tax
contingencies. Unfavorable settlement of any particular issue
would reduce a deferred tax asset or require the use of cash.
Favorable resolution could result in reduced income tax expense
reported in the financial statements in the future. The
Companys tax accruals are presented in the balance sheet
within Deferred income taxes and Other liabilities.
Various subsidiaries have foreign, federal and state
carry-forwards of $1,132,828 with expiration dates through 2025.
The Company believes that some uncertainty exists with respect
to future realization of certain loss carry-forwards, therefore
a valuation allowance totaling $34,829 has been established for
those carry-forwards where uncertainty exists. The valuation
allowance is primarily attributable to state net operating
losses and is due to complexities of the various state laws
restricting state net operating loss utilization.
F-65
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The loss carry-forwards will expire as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal | |
|
State | |
|
Foreign | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2006
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18,857 |
|
|
$ |
1,348 |
|
|
$ |
20,205 |
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,150 |
|
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
5,006 |
|
2008
|
|
|
1,529 |
|
|
|
10,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,722 |
|
2009
|
|
|
2,197 |
|
|
|
6,211 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
8,409 |
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,435 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
4,664 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
222,315 |
|
|
|
841,360 |
|
|
|
19,147 |
|
|
|
1,082,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
226,041 |
|
|
$ |
885,206 |
|
|
$ |
21,581 |
|
|
$ |
1,132,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note Eleven
Debt as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except | |
|
|
per share data) | |
6.0% notes due December 2005
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
63,801 |
|
7.2% notes due June 2006
|
|
|
10,698 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
6.875% notes due October 2007
|
|
|
13,497 |
|
|
|
143,475 |
|
6.5% notes due March 2008
|
|
|
195,000 |
|
|
|
195,000 |
|
7.7% notes due April 2009
|
|
|
341,635 |
|
|
|
358,266 |
|
7.875% debentures due February 2013
|
|
|
55,627 |
|
|
|
55,627 |
|
6.75% notes due April 2016
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
7.0% notes due June 2017
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible debentures, maturities through 2013, fixed interest
rates from 4.75% to 5.25%, conversion prices from $13.02 to
$50.00 per share
|
|
|
22,213 |
|
|
|
30,375 |
|
Mortgage notes and other debt, maturities through 2050
|
|
|
41,013 |
|
|
|
60,076 |
|
Unamortized pricing discounts and other
|
|
|
(22,482 |
) |
|
|
(28,103 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
1,207,201 |
|
|
|
1,278,517 |
|
Less current maturities
|
|
|
(20,716 |
) |
|
|
(78,164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$ |
1,186,485 |
|
|
$ |
1,200,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys consolidated debt had a weighted average
interest rate of 7.11% and 7.07% at December 31, 2005 and
2004, respectively. Approximately 99% of the total debt had a
fixed interest rate at December 31, 2005 and 2004.
F-66
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The aggregate maturities of debt for the five years subsequent
to December 31, 2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
note 2 | |
2006
|
|
$ |
20,716 |
|
2007
|
|
|
22,076 |
|
2008
|
|
|
203,559 |
|
2009
|
|
|
344,943 |
|
2010
|
|
|
2,680 |
|
2011 and thereafter
|
|
|
613,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,207,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys bank credit facility matures in August of
2007 and provides a total lending commitment of $200,000,
including a sub-limit of $175,000 for letters of credit. As of
December 31, 2005, the Company has no cash borrowings
outstanding under this credit facility, but has used the
facility to support $54,727 of letters of credit. The credit
facility provides the Company with flexibility for acquisitions,
dividends and share repurchases. It is secured by the stock of
the Companys domestic subsidiaries and these domestic
subsidiaries have guaranteed the Companys indebtedness
associated with this credit facility. The subsidiary guaranty is
a guaranty of payment of the outstanding amount of the total
lending commitment. It covers the term of the credit facility,
including extensions, and totaled a maximum potential amount of
$54,727 and $66,985 at December 31, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, respectively. The credit facility
contains certain financial covenants, including a minimum
interest coverage ratio, a maximum leverage ratio, maximum
capital expenditure limitations, minimum net worth requirements
and certain cash distribution restrictions. As of
December 31, 2005, the Company was in compliance with all
of its debt covenants. Interest rates for the outstanding
borrowings are based on various indices as determined by the
Company. The Company also pays a quarterly fee on the unused
commitment, which ranges from 0.25% to 0.50%.
|
|
|
Debt Issuances and Additions |
On June 15, 2005, the Company issued $300,000 in an
unregistered offering of senior unsecured 7.00% notes due
June 15, 2017, which pay interest semi-annually beginning
December 15, 2005. The Company used the net proceeds,
together with available cash, to purchase existing indebtedness
pursuant to the tender offer described in Debt
Extinguishments and Reductions. The notes are subject to the
provisions of the Companys Senior Indenture dated as of
February 1, 1993, as amended, which includes certain
covenants limiting, among other things, the creation of liens
securing indebtedness and sale-leaseback transactions. The
Company is entitled to redeem the notes at any time by paying a
make-whole premium. Under the terms of the issuance of the
unregistered notes, the Company has an obligation to register
the notes with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Because the Company did not file the related SEC registration
statement within the required time period, it incurred an
aggregate incremental interest expense of $250 during 2005.
In connection with $250,000 of senior unsecured 6.75% notes
due April 1, 2016, issued on April 14, 2004 in an
unregistered offering, the Company filed a registration
statement on September 2, 2004 with the SEC pursuant to a
Registration Rights Agreement.
F-67
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
Debt Extinguishments and Reductions |
In the first quarter of 2005, the Company purchased $7,131
aggregate principal amount of its 7.70% notes due 2009 in
the open market. As a result of this transaction, the Company
recognized a loss of $1,207 recorded in Loss on early
extinguishment of debt, in its consolidated statement of
operations. In the second quarter of 2005, the Company purchased
an additional $9,500 aggregate principal amount of its
7.70% notes due 2009, and $304 aggregate principal amount
of its 6.00% notes due 2005 in the open market. Also in the
second quarter of 2005, the Company redeemed $129,978 aggregate
principal amount of its 6.875% notes due 2007 and $139,302
aggregate principal amount of its 7.20% notes due 2006
pursuant to a tender offer for such notes. These transactions
resulted in a recognized loss of $13,051 recorded in (Loss)
gain on early extinguishment of debt. (Loss) gain on early
extinguishment of debt for 2005 is comprised of the
redemption premiums paid of $12,186 and the write-off of
unamortized debt issuance costs of $2,072. There were no early
extinguishments of debt transactions during the third quarter of
2005. In the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company redeemed $5,062
aggregate principal amount of its debentures associated with the
acquisitions of various locations. These transactions resulted
in no recognized gain or loss.
On December 15, 2005, as required by the terms of the
agreement, the Company repaid the remaining $63,497 of the
6.00% notes due 2005.
On April 15, 2004, as required by the terms of the
agreement, the Company repaid the remaining $111,190 of the
7.375% notes due 2004.
On April 22, 2004, the Company extinguished $200,000
aggregate principal amount of the 6.00% notes due 2005,
pursuant to the Offer to Purchase, dated March 24, 2004.
The Company paid $214,233 to the tendering holders, including a
premium and accrued interest. As a result of the transaction,
the Company recognized a loss on the early extinguishment of
debt of $10,831, recorded in (Loss) gain on early
extinguishment of debt, in its consolidated statement of
operations. In early May 2004, the Company also purchased $8,650
aggregate principal amount of the 6.00% notes due 2005 in
the open market. As a result of these transactions, the Company
recognized a loss of $333 recorded in (Loss) gain on early
extinguishment of debt, in its consolidated statement of
operations.
The holders of $221,633 of the Companys
6.75% convertible subordinated notes due 2008 converted
their holdings to equity on June 22, 2004, pursuant to the
terms of the notes. The Company paid $7,480 in accrued interest
to the holders. Simultaneously, the Company exercised its option
by redeeming the remaining outstanding $91,061 of the notes. The
Company paid a total of $97,649, including interest and
premiums, to the holders of the redeemed notes and recognized a
$5,606 loss on the early extinguishment of debt, recorded in
(Loss) gain on early extinguishment of debt, in its
consolidated statement of operations.
|
|
|
Additional Debt Disclosures |
At December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the
Company had deposited $12,056 and $26,707, respectively, in
restricted, interest-bearing accounts that were pledged as
collateral for various credit instruments and commercial
commitments. This restricted cash is included in Deferred
charges and other assets in the Companys consolidated
balance sheet. Unamortized pricing discounts, totaling $14,600
and $16,435 at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively,
primarily relate to the Companys September 2002 exchange
offering of the 7.7% notes due in 2009.
The Company had assets of approximately $12,676 and $24,580
pledged as collateral for the mortgage notes and other debt at
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
F-68
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Cash interest payments for the three years ended
December 31 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated) |
|
|
note 2 |
2005
|
|
$ |
95,678 |
|
2004
|
|
$ |
112,399 |
|
2003
|
|
$ |
138,090 |
|
Cash interest payments forecasted as of December 31, 2005
for the five years subsequent to December 31, 2005 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated) |
|
|
note 2 |
2006
|
|
$ |
90,189 |
|
2007
|
|
$ |
85,402 |
|
2008
|
|
$ |
72,846 |
|
2009
|
|
$ |
52,370 |
|
2010
|
|
$ |
44,528 |
|
2011 and thereafter
|
|
$ |
250,381 |
|
Note Twelve
The Company occasionally participates in hedging activities
using a variety of derivative instruments, including interest
rate swap agreements, cross-currency swap agreements, and
forward exchange contracts. These instruments are used to hedge
exposure to risk in the interest rate and foreign exchange rate
markets. The Company has documented policies and procedures to
monitor and control the use of derivative transactions, which
may only be executed with a limited group of creditworthy
financial institutions. The Company does not engage in
derivative transactions for speculative or trading purposes, nor
is it a party to leveraged derivatives.
During the third quarter of 2005, the Company hedged an
8,200,226 Chilean pesos (CLP) income tax receivable at a
forward price of 541 on June 30, 2006. At December 31,
2005, the Company has
marked-to-market the
income tax receivable and the hedge liability at the spot rate
of 514.14. For additional information regarding this matter, see
note twenty to these consolidated financial statements.
During the first quarter of 2004, the Company executed certain
forward exchange contracts, having an aggregate notional value
of EUR 240,000 and a corresponding notional value of
$300,011 to hedge its net foreign investment in France. Upon
receipt of the net proceeds from the transaction, the Company
settled these derivative instruments and recorded a gain of
$8,919 in Other comprehensive income (loss) in the
consolidated statement of stockholders equity, which was
then recognized pursuant to the sale of the Companys
operations in France in Gains and impairment (losses) on
dispositions, net in the consolidated statement of
operations.
The Company also executed certain forward exchange contracts
during the first half of 2004, having an aggregate notional
value of GBP 22,436 and a corresponding notional value of
$41,334, relating to the ultimate sale of its minority
investment in and the repayment of its note receivable from a
funeral and cemetery company in the United Kingdom. On
April 8, 2004, the Company received the expected proceeds
and settled these derivative instruments, recognizing a gain of
$198, which was recorded in Other income, net in the
consolidated statement of operations during the year ended
December 31, 2004.
The Company was not a party to any derivative instruments at
December 31, 2004.
F-69
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note Thirteen
|
|
|
Credit Risk and Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
The fair value estimates of the following financial instruments
have been determined using available market information and
appropriate valuation methodologies. The carrying values of cash
and cash equivalents, trade receivables and trade payables
approximate the fair values of those instruments due to the
short-term nature of the instruments. The fair values of
receivables on preneed funeral contracts and cemetery contracts
are impracticable to estimate because of the lack of a trading
market and the diverse number of individual contracts with
varying terms. The carrying value of other notes receivable
approximates the fair value. At December 31, 2005 and 2004,
other notes receivable, net, included in Receivables, net
totaled $16,099 and $3,339, respectively and included in
Deferred charges and other assets in the consolidated
balance sheet, totaled $21,567 and $41,302, respectively.
The fair value of the Companys debt at December 31
was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except | |
|
|
per share data) | |
6.0% notes due 2005
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
64,997 |
|
7.2% notes due 2006
|
|
|
10,698 |
|
|
|
156,188 |
|
6.875% notes due 2007
|
|
|
13,632 |
|
|
|
149,752 |
|
6.5% notes due 2008
|
|
|
198,412 |
|
|
|
200,850 |
|
7.7% notes due 2009
|
|
|
360,852 |
|
|
|
385,136 |
|
7.875% debentures due 2013
|
|
|
58,965 |
|
|
|
60,494 |
|
6.75% notes due 2016
|
|
|
246,250 |
|
|
|
255,000 |
|
7.0% notes due 2017
|
|
|
301,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible debentures, maturities through 2013, fixed interest
rates from 4.75% to 5.25%, conversion prices from $13.02 to
$50.00 per share
|
|
|
22,102 |
|
|
|
30,223 |
|
Mortgage notes and other debt, maturities through 2050
|
|
|
41,013 |
|
|
|
60,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value of debt
|
|
$ |
1,253,424 |
|
|
$ |
1,362,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair values of the Companys long-term, fixed rate and
convertible debt securities were estimated using market
conditions for those securities or for other securities having
similar terms and maturities. Mortgage notes and other debt have
been reported at face value because of the diverse terms and
conditions and non-trading nature of these notes.
The Companys cash deposits, some of which exceed insured
limits, are distributed among various regional and national
banks in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates. In
addition, the Company regularly invests excess cash in financial
instruments which are not insured, such as money-market funds
and Eurodollar time deposits, that are offered by a variety of
reputable financial institutions and commercial paper that is
offered by corporations with quality credit ratings. The Company
believes that the credit risk associated with such instruments
is minimal.
The Company grants credit to customers in the normal course of
business. The credit risk associated with funeral, cemetery and
preneed funeral and preneed cemetery receivables due from
customers is generally considered minimal because of the
diversification of the customers served. Furthermore, bad
F-70
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
debts have not been significant relative to the volume of
deferred revenues. Customer payments on preneed funeral or
preneed cemetery contracts that are either placed into state
regulated trusts or used to pay premiums on life insurance
contracts generally do not subject the Company to collection
risk. Insurance funded contracts are subject to supervision by
state insurance departments and are protected in the majority of
states by insurance guaranty acts.
Note Fourteen
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
The Companys leases principally relate to funeral home
facilities and transportation equipment. The majority of the
Companys operating leases contain options to
(i) purchase the property at fair value on the exercise
date, (ii) purchase the property for a value determined at
the inception of the leases, or (iii) renew for the fair
rental value at the end of the primary lease term. Rental
expense for these leases was $54,171, $67,603 and $75,560 for
the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003,
respectively. As of December 31, 2005, future minimum lease
payments for non-cancelable operating and capital leases
exceeding one year are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating | |
|
Capital | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
2006
|
|
$ |
34,075 |
|
|
$ |
1,781 |
|
2007
|
|
|
29,766 |
|
|
|
1,746 |
|
2008
|
|
|
25,157 |
|
|
|
1,706 |
|
2009
|
|
|
20,305 |
|
|
|
1,676 |
|
2010
|
|
|
14,762 |
|
|
|
1,593 |
|
2011 and thereafter
|
|
|
57,744 |
|
|
|
24,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
181,809 |
|
|
|
32,578 |
|
|
Less: Subleases
|
|
|
(1,826 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
179,983 |
|
|
$ |
32,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Interest on capital leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,153 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total principal payable on capital leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to eliminate the variable interest rate risk in the
Companys operating margins and improve the transparency of
our financial statements, we amended certain of our
transportation lease agreements subsequent to December 31,
2005. Based on the amended terms, these leases have been
converted from operating leases to capital leases in 2006. As of
December 31, 2005, the future minimum lease payments for
these leases were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
25,650 |
|
2007
|
|
|
22,290 |
|
2008
|
|
|
18,092 |
|
2009
|
|
|
13,679 |
|
2010
|
|
|
9,311 |
|
2011 and thereafter
|
|
|
4,236 |
|
F-71
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company entered into a purchase agreement for its North
America operations with a major casket manufacturer, having an
original minimum commitment of $750,000 for a six-year period
that expired at the end of 2004. The agreement contained
provisions for annual price adjustments and provided for a
one-year extension period to December 31, 2005, which the
Company elected to extend in order to satisfy its minimum
commitment. In the first quarter of 2005, the Company amended
its original agreement to allow the Company to continue
purchasing caskets through 2006, subject to price increase
limitations. Under this agreement, the retail value of the
Companys purchases was approximately $109,155, $106,275,
and $94,501 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004,
and 2003, respectively. At December 31, 2005, the remaining
commitment was $48,000. We expect this commitment to be
fulfilled in 2006.
|
|
|
Management, Consulting and Non-Competition Agreements |
The Company has entered into management, employment, consulting
and non-competition agreements, generally for five to ten years,
with certain officers and employees of the Company and former
owners of businesses acquired. The Company has modified several
of the above agreements as part of cost rationalization programs
(see note twenty to the consolidated financial statements). At
December 31, 2005, the maximum estimated future cash
commitment under agreements with remaining commitment terms was
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment | |
|
Consulting | |
|
Non-Competition | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2006
|
|
$ |
2,136 |
|
|
$ |
2,238 |
|
|
$ |
17,207 |
|
|
$ |
21,581 |
|
2007
|
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
2,021 |
|
|
|
11,637 |
|
|
|
14,914 |
|
2008
|
|
|
827 |
|
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
4,953 |
|
|
|
6,618 |
|
2009
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
765 |
|
|
|
1,652 |
|
|
|
2,763 |
|
2010
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
1,248 |
|
|
|
1,421 |
|
2011 and thereafter
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
1,867 |
|
|
|
2,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
4,733 |
|
|
$ |
6,343 |
|
|
$ |
38,564 |
|
|
$ |
49,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Representations and Warranties |
As of December 31, 2005, the Company has contingent
obligations of $33,504 resulting from the Companys
international asset sales and joint venture transactions. In
some cases, the Company has agreed to guarantee certain
representations and warranties made in such disposition
transactions with letters of credit or interest-bearing cash
investments. The Company has interest-bearing cash investments
of $6,754 included in Deferred charges and other assets
collateralizing certain of these contingent obligations. The
Company believes it is remote that it will ultimately be
required to fund to third parties claims against these
representations and warranties above the carrying value of the
liability.
F-72
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In March 2004, the Company disposed of its funeral operations in
France to a newly formed, third party company. As a result of
this sale, the Company recognized $35,768 of contractual
obligations related to representations, warranties, and other
indemnifications in accordance with the provisions of
FIN 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure
Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of
Indebtedness of Others. During 2005, the Company
released $7,125 of tax indemnification liabilities and paid
$2,105 to settle certain tax and litigation matters. The
remaining obligation of $24,138 at December 31, 2005
represents the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Potential | |
|
Carrying | |
|
|
Contractual | |
|
|
|
Amount of Future | |
|
Value as of | |
|
|
Obligation | |
|
Time Limit |
|
Payments | |
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Tax reserve liability
|
|
$ |
18,610 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
2005 100 million 2006 30 million |
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
Litigation provision
|
|
|
7,765 |
|
|
Until entire resolution of (i) the relevant claims or
(ii) settlement of the claim by the purchaser at the
request of the vendor |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
4,745 |
|
Employee litigation provision
|
|
|
6,512 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 (for all claims other than those relating
to tax and social security matters) one month after expiration
of the statutory period of limitations for tax and social
security matters. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
|
6,512 |
|
VAT taxes
|
|
|
3,882 |
|
|
One month after the expiration of statutory period of limitations |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
3,882 |
|
Other
|
|
|
3,381 |
|
|
Until entire resolution of (i) the relevant claims or
(ii) settlement of the claim by the purchaser at the
request of the vendor |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
|
3,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
40,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
28,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Deductible of majority equity owner
|
|
|
(4,382 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,382 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
35,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
24,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The potential maximum exposure for these two items combined is
20 million. |
|
(2) |
The potential maximum exposure for these two items combined is
40 million. |
The Company is a party to various litigation matters,
investigations and proceedings. For each of its outstanding
legal matters, the Company evaluates the merits of the case, its
exposure to the matter, possible legal or settlement strategies
and the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome. If the Company
determines that an unfavorable outcome is probable and can be
reasonably estimated, it establishes the necessary accruals.
Certain insurance policies held by the Company may reduce cash
outflows with respect
F-73
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
to an adverse outcome of certain of these litigation matters.
The Company accrues such insurance recoveries when they become
probable of being paid and can be reasonably estimated.
Conley Investment Counsel v. Service Corporation
International, et al; Civil Action 04-MD-1609; In the
United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas,
Houston Division (the 2003 Securities Lawsuit). The 2003
Securities Lawsuit resulted from the transfer and consolidation
by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation of three
lawsuits Edgar Neufeld v. Service
Corporation International, et al; Cause
No. CV-S-03-1561-HDM-PAL;
In the United States District Court for the District of Nevada;
and Rujira Srisythemp v. Service Corporation
International, et. al.; Cause
No. CV-S-03-1392-LDG-LRL;
In the United States District Court for the District of
Nevada; and Joshua Ackerman v. Service Corporation
International, et. al.; Cause No. 04-CV-20114; In the
United States District Court for the Southern District of
Florida. The 2003 Securities Lawsuit names as defendants the
Company and several of the Companys current and former
executive officers or directors. The 2003 Securities Lawsuit is
a purported class action alleging that the defendants failed to
disclose the unlawful treatment of human remains and gravesites
at two cemeteries in Fort Lauderdale and West Palm Beach,
Florida. Since the action is in its preliminary stages, no
discovery has occurred, and the Company cannot quantify its
ultimate liability, if any, for the payment of damages.
David Hijar v. SCI Texas Funeral Services, Inc., SCI
Funeral Services, Inc., and Service Corporation
International; In the County Court of El Paso, County,
Texas, County Court at Law Number Three; Cause Number 2002-740,
with an interlocutory appeal pending in the El Paso Court
of Appeals, No. 08-05-00182-CV, and a mandamus proceeding
pending in the El Paso Court of Appeals,
No. 08-05-00335-CV (collectively, the Hijar Lawsuit). The
Hijar Lawsuit involves a state-wide class action brought on
behalf of all persons, entities and organizations who purchased
funeral services from the Company or its subsidiaries in Texas
at any time since March 18, 1998. Plaintiffs allege that
federal and Texas funeral related regulations and/or statutes
(Rules) required the Company to disclose its markups on all
items obtained from third parties in connection with funeral
service contracts and that the failure to make certain
disclosures of markups resulted in breach of contract and other
legal claims. The Plaintiffs seek to recover an unspecified
amount of monetary damages. The plaintiffs also seek
attorneys fees, costs of court, pre- and post-judgment
interest, and unspecified injunctive and declaratory
relief. The Company denies that the plaintiffs have
standing to sue for violations of the Texas Occupations Code or
the Rules, denies that plaintiffs have standing to sue for
violations under the relevant regulations and statutes, denies
that any breaches of contractual terms occurred, and on other
grounds denies liability on all of the plaintiffs claims.
Finally, the Company denies that the Hijar Lawsuit satisfies the
requirements for class certification.
In May 2004, the trial court heard summary judgement
cross-motions filed by the Company and Plaintiff Hijar (at that
time, the only plaintiff). The trial court granted Hijars
motion for partial summary judgement and denied the
Companys motion. In its partial summary judgement order,
the trial court made certain findings to govern the case,
consistent with its summary judgement ruling. The Companys
request for rehearing was denied.
During the course of the Hijar Lawsuit, the parties have
disputed the proper scope and substance of discovery. Following
briefing by both parties and evidentiary hearings, the trial
court entered three orders against the Company that are the
subject of appellate review: (a) a January 2005 discovery
sanctions order; (b) an April 2005 discovery sanctions
order; and (c) an April 2005 certification order,
certifying a class and two subclasses. On April 29, 2005,
the Company filed an appeal regarding the certification order
and, concurrently with its initial brief in that appeal, filed a
separate mandamus proceeding regarding the sanctions orders. The
reply brief in the certification appeal is due on March 3,
2006. The court of appeals denied the mandamus petition in
January 2006, and the Company has moved for rehearing.
Mary Louise Baudino, et al v. Service Corporation
International, et al; the plaintiffs counsel in
the Hijar Lawsuit initiated an arbitration claim raising similar
issues in California and filed in November 2004
F-74
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
a case styled Mary Louise Baudino, et al v. Service
Corporation International, et al; in Los Angeles County
Superior Court; Case No. BC324007 (Baudino Lawsuit). The
Baudino Lawsuit makes claims similar to those made in the Hijar
lawsuit. However, the Baudino Lawsuit seeks a nation-wide class
of plaintiffs. The Baudino Lawsuit is in its early stages and
discovery is in its infancy.
Regarding funeral and casket antitrust litigation, the Company
is a defendant in three related class action antitrust cases
filed in 2005. The first case is Cause No 4:05-CV-03394;
Funeral Consumers Alliance, Inc. v. Service Corporation
International, et al; In the United States District
Court for the Southern District of Texas Houston
(Funeral Consumers Case). This is a purported class action on
behalf of casket consumers throughout the United States alleging
that the Company and several other companies involved in the
funeral industry violated federal antitrust laws and state
consumer laws by engaging in various anti-competitive conduct
associated with the sale of caskets. A related class action
lawsuit (Leoncio Solis v. Service Corporation
International; In the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Texas Houston Division) was
consolidated into the Funeral Consumers Case in the fourth
quarter of 2005.
The Company is also a defendant in Ralph Lee Fancher v.
Service Corporation International, et al; In the United
States District Court for the Southern District of
Texas Houston Division, and
Cause No. 4:05-CV-00246.
This lawsuit, which was previously consolidated with the Funeral
Consumers Case, makes the same allegations as the Funeral
Consumers Case and is also brought against several other
companies involved in the funeral industry. The case is a
purported class action on behalf of casket consumers throughout
the United States and alleges that the Company violated the
Tennessee Trade Practices Act.
The Company is also a defendant in Cause No. 4:05-CV-03399;
Pioneer Valley Casket, et al. v. Service
Corporation International, et al.; In the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Houston Division. This lawsuit makes the same allegations as the
Funeral Consumers Case and is also brought against several other
companies involved in the funeral industry. Unlike the Funeral
Consumers Case, this case is a purported class action on behalf
of all independent casket distributors that are in the business
or were in the business any time between July 18, 2001 and
to present.
The funeral and casket antitrust lawsuits seek injunctions,
unspecified amounts of monetary damages and treble damages.
Since the litigation is in its preliminary stages, the Company
cannot quantify its ultimate liability, if any, for the payment
of damages.
In addition to the funeral and casket antitrust lawsuits, the
Company has received Civil Investigative Demands, dated in
August 2005 and February 2006, from the Attorney General of
Maryland on behalf of itself and other state attorneys general,
who have commenced an investigation of alleged anticompetitive
practices in the funeral industry. The Company has also received
similar Civil Investigative Demands from the Attorneys General
of Florida and Connecticut.
The ultimate outcome of the matters described above under the
caption Litigation cannot be determined at this time. An adverse
decision in one or more of such matters could have a material
adverse effect on the Company, its financial condition, results
of operation and cash flows. However, the Company intends to
aggressively defend all of the above lawsuits.
F-75
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note Fifteen
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity
(All shares reported in whole numbers) |
The Company is authorized to issue 1,000,000 shares of
preferred stock, $1 per share par value. No preferred
shares were issued as of December 31, 2005 and 2004. At
December 31, 2005 and 2004, 500,000,000 common shares
of $1 par value were authorized. The Company had
294,808,872 and 323,225,352 shares issued and outstanding,
net of 48,962,063 and 18,502,478 shares held in treasury at
par at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
|
|
|
Share Purchase Rights Plan |
The Board of Directors has adopted a preferred share purchase
rights plan and has declared a dividend of one preferred share
purchase right for each share of common stock outstanding. The
rights are exercisable in the event certain investors attempt to
acquire 20% or more of the common stock of the Company and
entitle the rights holders to purchase certain securities of the
Company or the acquiring company. The rights, which are
redeemable by the Company for $.01 per right, expire in
July 2008 unless extended.
The Company has benefit plans whereby shares of the
Companys common stock may be issued pursuant to the
exercise of stock options granted to officers and key employees.
The Companys Amended 1996 Incentive Plan reserves
24,000,000 shares of common stock for outstanding and
future awards of stock options, restricted stock and other stock
based awards to officers and key employees of the Company. The
Companys 1996 Non-qualified Incentive Plan reserves
8,700,000 shares of common stock for outstanding and future
awards of nonqualified stock options to employees who are not
officers of the Company.
The benefit plans allow for options to be granted as either
non-qualified or incentive stock options. The options are
granted with an exercise price equal to the then current market
price of the Companys common stock. The options are
generally exercisable at a rate of
331/3%
each year unless alternative vesting methods are approved by the
Companys Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.
Options of 1,959,283 and 4,034,123, respectively, were
outstanding with alternative vesting methods at
December 31, 2005 and 2004. Under the alternative vesting
methods, partial or full accelerated vesting will occur when the
price of Company common stock reaches pre-determined prices. If
the pre-determined stock prices are not met in the required time
period, the options will fully vest in periods ranging from
eight to ten years from grant date. At December 31, 2005
and 2004, 4,856,459 and 3,748,668, respectively, were reserved
for future option and restricted stock grants under all stock
option plans.
F-76
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following tables set forth certain stock option information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average | |
|
|
Options | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding at December 31, 2002
|
|
|
32,785,147 |
|
|
$ |
11.63 |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(382,295 |
) |
|
|
3.70 |
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(1,303,735 |
) |
|
|
25.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
31,099,117 |
|
|
$ |
10.77 |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
655,650 |
|
|
|
6.81 |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(2,556,573 |
) |
|
|
4.06 |
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(1,526,678 |
) |
|
|
15.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
27,671,516 |
|
|
$ |
10.77 |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,167,400 |
|
|
|
6.90 |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1,994,447 |
) |
|
|
3.97 |
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(2,594,040 |
) |
|
|
28.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
24,250,429 |
|
|
$ |
9.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
23,629,825 |
|
|
$ |
10.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
25,423,111 |
|
|
$ |
11.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
22,718,881 |
|
|
$ |
9.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Range of |
|
Outstanding at |
|
Remaining |
|
Weighted-Average |
|
Exercisable at |
|
Weighted-Average |
Exercise Price |
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
Contractual Life |
|
Exercise Price |
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 0.00 - 4.00
|
|
|
7,764,932 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
$ |
3.43 |
|
|
|
7,764,932 |
|
|
$ |
3.43 |
|
|
4.01 - 6.00
|
|
|
4,603,296 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
4.93 |
|
|
|
4,603,296 |
|
|
|
4.93 |
|
|
6.01 - 9.00
|
|
|
4,842,917 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
6.73 |
|
|
|
3,311,369 |
|
|
|
6.67 |
|
|
9.01 - 15.00
|
|
|
2,898,444 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
13.73 |
|
|
|
2,898,444 |
|
|
|
13.73 |
|
15.01 - 21.00
|
|
|
2,376,280 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
19.09 |
|
|
|
2,376,280 |
|
|
|
19.09 |
|
21.01 - 38.00
|
|
|
1,764,560 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
31.84 |
|
|
|
1,764,560 |
|
|
|
31.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 0.00 - 38.00
|
|
|
24,250,429 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
9.21 |
|
|
|
22,718,881 |
|
|
$ |
9.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since all of the Companys options have been granted at
market value on the dates of each grant, the Company has not
recognized compensation expense on stock options under its
current accounting policy using the intrinsic value method. On
January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS 123R, which
requires the use of the fair value method of valuing stock
options. For additional information regarding SFAS 123R,
see note three to these consolidated financial statements.
Restricted shares awarded under the Amended 1996 Incentive Plan
were 498,800 in 2005 and 427,800 in 2004. The weighted average
fair market value per share at the date of grant of shares
granted for 2005 and 2004 was $7.37 and $6.81, respectively. No
restricted shares were issued during 2003. The fair market value
of the stock, on the date of issuance, is being amortized and
charged to income (with similar credits to paid-in capital and
excess of par value) generally over the average period during
which the restrictions lapse. At December 31, 2005, the
unamortized amount was $3,593. The Company recognized
compensation cost of $2,086 in 2005 and $889 in 2004 related to
this Plan.
F-77
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Companys Director Fee Plan allows for compensation to
non-employee directors to be partially paid in common stock. In
2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively, 69,608, 68,586 and
155,560 shares of common stock were granted under the
Director Fee Plan. Certain directors, as permitted in the plan
agreement, have elected to defer the issuance of stock granted
under this plan. In 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively,
19,888, 39,192 and 60,614 shares were reserved
for future issuance under this plan. In 2005, 8,385 previously
deferred shares were issued. The Company recognized compensation
cost of $490, $770 and $565 during the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, related to
this Plan.
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income |
The Companys components of accumulated other
comprehensive (loss) income at December 31 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign | |
|
Minimum | |
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
Currency | |
|
Pension | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Other | |
|
|
Translation | |
|
Liability | |
|
Gains and | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
|
Adjustment | |
|
Adjustment | |
|
Losses | |
|
(Loss) Income | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
|
note 2 | |
|
|
|
note 2 | |
Balance at December 31, 2002
|
|
$ |
(170,617 |
) |
|
$ |
(36,768 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(207,385 |
) |
|
Activity in 2003
|
|
|
92,504 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
(78,113 |
) |
|
|
(36,636 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(114,749 |
) |
|
Activity in 2004
|
|
|
(9,242 |
) |
|
|
36,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,394 |
|
|
Reduction in net unrealized gains associated with
available-for-sale securities of the trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,370 |
) |
|
|
(9,370 |
) |
|
Reclassification of net unrealized gains activity attributable
to the non-controlling interest holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,370 |
|
|
|
9,370 |
|
|
Reclassification for translation adjustment realized in net
income
|
|
|
49,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
(38,349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,349 |
) |
|
Activity in 2005
|
|
|
7,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,260 |
|
|
Reduction in net unrealized gains associated with
available-for-sale securities of the trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69,226 |
) |
|
|
(69,226 |
) |
|
Reclassification of net unrealized gains activity attributable
to the non-controlling interest holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,226 |
|
|
|
69,226 |
|
|
Reclassification for translation adjustment realized in net loss
|
|
|
101,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
70,499 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
70,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reclassification adjustment of $101,588 during the year
ended December 31, 2005 includes $71,770 related to the
sale of the Companys operations in Argentina and Uruguay
and $29,818 related to the sale of its cemetery businesses in
Chile. The reclassification adjustment of $49,006 during the
year ended December 31, 2004 relates to the sale of the
Companys interest in its French operations and includes an
associated deferred tax asset of $59,662.
The assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated
into U.S. dollars using the current exchange rate. The
U.S. dollar amount that arises from such translation, as
well as exchange gains and losses on intercompany balances of a
long-term investment nature, are included in the cumulative
currency translation adjustments in Accumulated other
comprehensive (loss) income. Income taxes are generally not
provided for foreign currency translation.
F-78
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The minimum pension liability adjustment for the year ended
December 31, 2004 of $35,062 is net of deferred taxes of
$22,202. The minimum pension liability adjustment for the year
ended December 31, 2003 of $132 is net of deferred taxes of
$81.
On June 23, 2005, the Company announced an increase in its
stock repurchase program authorizing the investment of an
additional $100,000 to repurchase the Companys common
stock, for an aggregate authorized amount of $400,000. The
Company, subject to market conditions and normal trading
restrictions, makes purchases in the open market or through
privately negotiated transactions. During 2005, the Company
repurchased 30,956 shares of common stock at an aggregate
cost of $225,152. During 2004, the Company repurchased
16,725 shares of common stock at an aggregate cost of
$110,258. As of December 31, 2005, the remaining dollar
value of shares that may be purchased under the share repurchase
program was approximately $64,590.
In the first quarter of 2005, the Companys Board of
Directors approved the initiation of a quarterly cash dividend
of $.025 per common share. During 2005, the Company paid
quarterly dividends of $22,637 and accrued $7,415 for dividends
paid on January 31, 2006. These transactions were recorded
in Capital in Excess of Par Value in the consolidated
balance sheet for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Subsequent to December 31, 2005, the Companys Board
of Directors approved a dividend payable on April 28, 2006
to shareholders of record at April 13, 2006.
Note Sixteen
The Company has a non-contributory, defined benefit pension plan
covering approximately 34% of United States employees (US
Pension Plan), a supplemental retirement plan for certain
current and former key employees (SERP), a supplemental
retirement plan for officers and certain key employees (Senior
SERP), and a retirement plan for certain non-employee directors
(Directors Plan) (collectively, the Plans).
The Company also provides a 401(k) employee savings plan.
Effective January 1, 2001, the Company curtailed its US
Pension Plan, SERP, Senior SERP and Directors Plan. As
these plans have been frozen, the participants do not earn
incremental benefits from additional years of service and the
Company does not incur new service cost after December 31,
2000.
Retirement benefits for the US Pension Plan are generally based
on years of service and compensation. This contribution is an
actuarially determined amount. Assets of the pension plan
consist of core diversified and
market-neutral hedge
funds, fixed income investments and marketable equity
securities, which complies with the funding requirements of the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.
Retirement benefits under the SERP are based on years of service
and average monthly compensation, reduced by benefits under the
US Pension Plan and Social Security. The Senior SERP provides
retirement benefits based on years of service and position. The
Directors Plan provides for an annual benefit to directors
following their retirement, based on a vesting schedule.
Most foreign employees are covered by their respective foreign
government-mandated or defined contribution plans which are
adequately funded and are not considered significant to the
financial condition or results of operations of the Company. The
plans liabilities and their related costs are computed in
accordance with the laws of the individual countries and
appropriate actuarial practices.
F-79
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of the Plans net periodic benefit cost for
the years ended December 31 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
|
|
$ |
8,111 |
|
|
$ |
9,160 |
|
|
$ |
10,117 |
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
(7,226 |
) |
|
|
(10,690 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,808 |
) |
Settlement/curtailment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
455 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
Recognized net actuarial loss
|
|
|
8,124 |
|
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
7,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,192 |
|
|
$ |
(654 |
) |
|
$ |
11,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,192 |
|
|
$ |
59,180 |
|
|
$ |
11,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Plans funded status at December 31 was as follows
(based on valuations as of September 30):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
Change in Benefit Obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
139,742 |
|
|
$ |
147,553 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
8,111 |
|
|
|
9,160 |
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
7,701 |
|
|
|
2,644 |
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(18,302 |
) |
|
|
(19,615 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
$ |
137,252 |
|
|
$ |
139,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Plan Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
88,550 |
|
|
$ |
74,309 |
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
7,226 |
|
|
|
10,690 |
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
3,753 |
|
|
|
23,787 |
|
Benefits paid, including expenses
|
|
|
(18,726 |
) |
|
|
(20,236 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
$ |
80,803 |
|
|
$ |
88,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status of plan
|
|
$ |
(56,449 |
) |
|
$ |
(51,192 |
) |
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
$ |
(55,642 |
) |
|
$ |
(50,202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funding Summary:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligations
|
|
$ |
137,252 |
|
|
$ |
139,742 |
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
$ |
137,252 |
|
|
$ |
139,742 |
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
$ |
80,803 |
|
|
$ |
88,550 |
|
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued benefit liability
|
|
$ |
(56,449 |
) |
|
$ |
(51,192 |
) |
Intangible asset
|
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
$ |
(55,642 |
) |
|
$ |
(50,202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-80
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The retirement benefits under the SERP, Senior SERP and
Directors Plan are unfunded obligations of the Company. As
of December 31, 2005, the benefit obligation of the SERP,
Senior SERP and Directors Plan is $31,272; however, the
Company has purchased various life insurance policies on the
participants in the Senior SERP with the intent to use the
proceeds or any cash value buildup from such policies to assist
in meeting, at least to the extent of such assets, the
plans funding requirements. The face value of these
insurance policies was $54,031 and the cash surrender value was
$36,776 as of December 31, 2005. No loans are outstanding
against the policies, but there are no restrictions in the
policies regarding loans.
Due to the Companys change in accounting for gains and
losses on pension plan assets and obligations effective
January 1, 2004, the change in minimum liability included
in Accumulated other comprehensive loss was a decrease of
$59,834 in 2004. The Company recorded net pension
(expense) income of $(9,192), $654 and ($11,937) for the
years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
The Plans weighted-average assumptions used to determine
the benefit obligation and net benefit cost were as follows: The
Company bases its discount rate used to compute future benefit
obligations using an analysis of expected future benefit
payments. The reasonableness of its discount rate is verified by
comparing its rate to the rate earned on high-quality fixed
income investments, such as the Moodys Aa index, on
high-quality fixed income investments plus 50 basis points.
Discount rates used to determine pension obligations for the
U.S. plans were 5.75%, 6.00% and 6.25% for the years ended
2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively. Because all of the Plans
were curtailed effective January 1, 2001, the assumed rate
of return on plan assets was not applicable to 2005 or 2004 as
the Company now recognizes gains and losses on plan assets
during the year in which they occur. The 9.0% assumed rate of
return on plan assets during 2003 was a result of a high
allocation of equity securities within the plan assets. Due to
the curtailment of the Plans, the assumed rate of compensation
increase is zero. In March 2004, the Company voluntarily
contributed $20,000 to the frozen U.S. Pension Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Discount rate used to determine obligations
|
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
Assumed rate of return on plan assets
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
9.00 |
% |
Discount rate used to determine net periodic pension cost
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
7.00 |
% |
The Plans weighted-average asset allocations at
December 31 by asset category are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Core diversified and market-neutral hedge funds
|
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
55 |
% |
Fixed income investments
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
Equity securities(1)
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Equity securities do not include shares of Company common stock
at December 31, 2005 or 2004. |
F-81
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The primary investment objective of the plan is to achieve a
rate of investment return over time that will allow the plan to
achieve a fully funded status, while maintaining prudent
investment return volatility levels. In 2004, the investment
strategy was revised to have a lower percentage invested in
traditional equity securities and fixed income securities and
instead include investments in hedge funds allowing for reduced
volatility with limited reduction of returns. The Company has an
asset allocation strategy of 35% traditional equity, 15% fixed
income and 50% hedge funds. Allocations within the equity asset
class are divided among large capitalization domestic equity
(value and growth styles), small capitalization domestic equity
(value and growth styles) and international equity. The large
capitalization domestic equity may be further diversified
between active and passive (index) management styles. The
fixed income allocation is divided between cash and an
intermediate-term investment grade bond portfolio. Based on this
asset mix, the Company expects a long-term rate of return on
plan assets of approximately 7.0% to 7.5%. The investment
strategy is managed within ranges that are centered at specific
allocation targets. The specific allocations within the
strategy, as well as the individual asset class ranges are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ranges | |
|
|
| |
Large cap equity (value and growth)
|
|
|
10% - 25% |
|
Small gap growth
|
|
|
5% - 10% |
|
International equity
|
|
|
5% - 10% |
|
Fixed income core bond
|
|
|
0% - 25% |
|
Hedge funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core diversified
|
|
|
15% - 35% |
|
|
Market neutral
|
|
|
15% - 35% |
|
Money market
|
|
|
0% - 1% |
|
The following benefit payments are expected to be paid:
|
|
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
$ |
7,447 |
|
2007
|
|
|
6,590 |
|
2008
|
|
|
6,972 |
|
2009
|
|
|
7,405 |
|
2010
|
|
|
8,169 |
|
Years 2011 through 2015
|
|
$ |
41,001 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Included in the $7,447 expected benefit payments for 2006 is
$3,936 the Company expects to contribute for the SERP, Senior
SERP, and Directors Plan expected benefit payments. |
Effective January 1, 2004, the Company changed its method
of accounting for gains and losses on its pension plan assets
and obligations. Pursuant to this new accounting method, the
Company recognizes pension related gains and losses in its
consolidated statement of operations in the year such gains and
losses are incurred. Prior to January 1, 2004, the Company
amortized the difference between actual and expected investment
returns and actuarial gains and losses over seven years (except
to the extent that settlements with employees required earlier
recognition). The Company believes this change in accounting is
preferable as the new method of accounting better reflects the
economic nature of the Companys Plans and recognizes gains
and losses on the Plan assets and obligations in the year the
gains and losses occur. As a result of this accounting change,
the Company recognized a cumulative effect charge of an
accounting change of $36,636, net of tax of $23,198, as of
January 1, 2004. This amount represents accumulated
unrecognized net losses related to the pension plan assets and
obligations.
F-82
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company has an employee savings plan that qualifies under
section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code for the
exclusive benefit of its United States employees. Under the
plan, participating employees may contribute a portion of their
pretax and/or after tax income in accordance with specified
guidelines up to a maximum of 50%. During 2005, the Company then
matched a percentage of the employee contributions through
contributions of cash. During 2004 and 2003, the Company matched
employee contributions through contributions of the
Companys common stock. For each of the three years, the
Companys matching contribution was based upon the
following:
|
|
|
Years of Vesting Service |
|
Percentage of Deferred Compensation |
|
|
|
0 - 5 years
|
|
75% of the first 6% of deferred compensation |
6 - 10 years
|
|
110% of the first 6% of deferred compensation |
11 or more years
|
|
135% of the first 6% of deferred compensation |
The amount of the Companys matched contributions in 2005,
2004 and 2003 was $16,456, $18,127 and $17,378, respectively.
Note Seventeen
The Companys operations are both product based and
geographically based, and the reportable operating segments
presented below include the Companys funeral and cemetery
operations. The Companys geographic areas include North
America and Other Foreign.
In 2005, Other Foreign consists of the Companys operations
in Singapore and Germany. In 2004, Other Foreign also included
operations in France, which were disposed of in the first
quarter of 2004. Results from the Companys funeral and
cemetery businesses in Argentina and Uruguay, which were sold in
the first quarter of 2005, and its cemetery business in Chile,
which was sold in the third quarter of 2005, are classified as
discontinued operations for all periods presented. The Company
conducts both funeral and cemetery operations in North America
and funeral operations in Other Foreign geographic areas.
F-83
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Companys reportable segment information is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable | |
|
|
Funeral | |
|
Cemetery | |
|
Segments | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$ |
1,155,357 |
|
|
$ |
560,380 |
|
|
$ |
1,715,737 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,124 |
|
|
|
1,539 |
|
|
|
5,663 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
49,674 |
|
|
|
17,828 |
|
|
|
67,502 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
216,224 |
|
|
|
81,921 |
|
|
|
298,145 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
3,360,546 |
|
|
|
3,600,473 |
|
|
|
6,961,019 |
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
48,964 |
|
|
$ |
46,756 |
|
|
$ |
95,720 |
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$ |
1,259,821 |
|
|
$ |
571,404 |
|
|
$ |
1,831,225 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,326 |
|
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
5,806 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
59,654 |
|
|
|
66,498 |
|
|
|
126,152 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
227,812 |
|
|
|
102,202 |
|
|
|
330,014 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
3,521,512 |
|
|
|
4,219,900 |
|
|
|
7,741,412 |
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
36,155 |
|
|
$ |
40,180 |
|
|
$ |
76,335 |
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$ |
1,739,768 |
|
|
$ |
573,409 |
|
|
$ |
2,313,177 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
5,334 |
|
|
|
3,119 |
|
|
|
8,453 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
84,599 |
|
|
|
64,957 |
|
|
|
149,556 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
273,764 |
|
|
|
82,446 |
|
|
|
356,210 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
3,715,538 |
|
|
|
3,382,975 |
|
|
|
7,098,513 |
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
69,622 |
|
|
$ |
43,872 |
|
|
$ |
113,494 |
|
F-84
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table reconciles certain reportable segment
amounts to the Companys corresponding consolidated amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable | |
|
|
|
Discontinued | |
|
|
|
|
Segments | |
|
Corporate | |
|
Operations | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
note 2 | |
|
|
|
|
|
note 2 | |
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers
|
|
$ |
1,715,737 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,715,737 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
5,663 |
|
|
|
98,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,733 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
67,502 |
|
|
|
20,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,885 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
6,961,018 |
|
|
|
583,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,544,769 |
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
95,720 |
|
|
$ |
3,696 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
99,416 |
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers
|
|
$ |
1,831,225 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,831,225 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
5,806 |
|
|
|
113,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,293 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
126,152 |
|
|
|
19,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,189 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
7,741,412 |
|
|
|
470,290 |
|
|
|
15,452 |
|
|
|
8,227,154 |
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
76,335 |
|
|
$ |
19,284 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
95,619 |
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers
|
|
$ |
2,313,177 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,313,177 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
8,453 |
|
|
|
131,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139,964 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
149,556 |
|
|
|
11,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,443 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
7,098,513 |
|
|
|
463,361 |
|
|
|
9,318 |
|
|
|
7,571,192 |
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
113,494 |
|
|
$ |
1,977 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
115,471 |
|
The following table reconciles gross profits from reportable
segments shown above to the Companys consolidated income
from continuing operations before income taxes and cumulative
effects of accounting changes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
Gross profit from reportable segments
|
|
$ |
298,145 |
|
|
$ |
330,014 |
|
|
$ |
356,210 |
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(84,834 |
) |
|
|
(130,884 |
) |
|
|
(178,127 |
) |
|
Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions, net
|
|
|
(26,093 |
) |
|
|
25,797 |
|
|
|
50,677 |
|
|
Other operating expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,004 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
187,218 |
|
|
|
224,927 |
|
|
|
219,756 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(103,733 |
) |
|
|
(119,293 |
) |
|
|
(139,964 |
) |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
16,706 |
|
|
|
13,453 |
|
|
|
6,215 |
|
|
(Loss) gain on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(14,258 |
) |
|
|
(16,770 |
) |
|
|
1,315 |
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
2,774 |
|
|
|
9,703 |
|
|
|
8,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
cumulative effects of accounting changes
|
|
$ |
88,707 |
|
|
$ |
112,020 |
|
|
$ |
95,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-85
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Companys geographic area information was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North | |
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
America | |
|
Foreign | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
note 2 | |
|
|
|
note 2 | |
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$ |
1,703,944 |
|
|
$ |
11,793 |
|
|
$ |
1,715,737 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
103,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,733 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
87,469 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
87,885 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
185,759 |
|
|
|
1,459 |
|
|
|
187,218 |
|
Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions, net
|
|
|
(26,093 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,093 |
) |
Long-lived assets
|
|
$ |
3,673,137 |
|
|
$ |
6,160 |
|
|
$ |
3,679,297 |
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$ |
1,690,263 |
|
|
$ |
140,962 |
|
|
$ |
1,831,225 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
119,174 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
119,293 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
144,326 |
|
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
145,189 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
211,593 |
|
|
|
13,334 |
|
|
|
224,927 |
|
Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions, net
|
|
|
25,705 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
25,797 |
|
Long-lived assets
|
|
$ |
4,197,939 |
|
|
$ |
91,400 |
|
|
$ |
4,289,339 |
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$ |
1,716,050 |
|
|
$ |
597,127 |
|
|
$ |
2,313,177 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
137,749 |
|
|
|
2,215 |
|
|
|
139,964 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
161,013 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
161,443 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
147,927 |
|
|
|
71,829 |
|
|
|
219,756 |
|
Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions, net
|
|
|
51,411 |
|
|
|
(734 |
) |
|
|
50,677 |
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
(9,004 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,004 |
) |
Long-lived assets
|
|
$ |
4,289,492 |
|
|
$ |
456,882 |
|
|
$ |
4,746,374 |
|
Included in the North American figures above are the following
United States amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$ |
1,596,389 |
|
|
$ |
1,583,979 |
|
|
$ |
1,633,221 |
|
Operating income(1)
|
|
|
161,753 |
|
|
|
184,177 |
|
|
|
130,781 |
|
Long-lived assets
|
|
$ |
3,433,506 |
|
|
$ |
3,951,856 |
|
|
$ |
4,130,177 |
|
Included in the Other Foreign figures above are the following
French amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
127,282 |
|
|
$ |
584,636 |
|
Operating income(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,664 |
|
|
|
68,884 |
|
Long-lived assets
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
364,570 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Operating income includes $(27,597), $24,625 and $41,397 in
Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions, net and
Other operating expenses in the United States and $0, $92
and ($734) in Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions,
net in France for the years ended December 31, 2005,
2004, and 2003, respectively. |
In 2004, the Company sold its funeral operations in France and
obtained a 25% minority interest equity investment in the
acquiring entity. The Company now accounts for its 25% ownership
of France using the equity method of accounting.
F-86
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
During 2005 and 2004, the Company divested certain North America
and international funeral service locations and cemeteries.
Certain of these divested operations do not qualify as
discontinued operations under SFAS 144 and related guidance
because either the divested operations were held for sale in
accordance with previous accounting pronouncements related to
dispositions or they do not meet the criteria as defined in
SFAS 144 and related guidance. Summarized operating results
of the Companys divested operations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America | |
|
Other Foreign | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
$ |
36,287 |
|
|
$ |
71,870 |
|
|
$ |
96,538 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
127,282 |
|
|
$ |
584,636 |
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
11,292 |
|
|
|
19,811 |
|
|
|
20,484 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
1,269 |
|
|
|
1,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
47,579 |
|
|
$ |
91,681 |
|
|
$ |
117,022 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
128,551 |
|
|
$ |
585,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
$ |
1,714 |
|
|
$ |
7,018 |
|
|
$ |
8,788 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11,572 |
|
|
$ |
68,275 |
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
(1,671 |
) |
|
|
(1,060 |
) |
|
|
4,510 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
5,958 |
|
|
$ |
13,298 |
|
|
$ |
(40 |
) |
|
$ |
11,697 |
|
|
$ |
68,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
$ |
36,287 |
|
|
$ |
199,152 |
|
|
$ |
681,174 |
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
11,374 |
|
|
|
21,080 |
|
|
|
21,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
47,661 |
|
|
$ |
220,232 |
|
|
$ |
702,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
$ |
1,714 |
|
|
$ |
18,590 |
|
|
$ |
77,063 |
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
(1,711 |
) |
|
|
(935 |
) |
|
|
4,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
17,655 |
|
|
$ |
81,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-87
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note Eighteen
|
|
|
Supplementary Information |
The detail of certain balance sheet accounts is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
5,594 |
|
|
$ |
4,692 |
|
|
Commercial paper and temporary investments
|
|
|
441,188 |
|
|
|
283,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
446,782 |
|
|
$ |
287,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivable
|
|
$ |
16,099 |
|
|
$ |
3,339 |
|
|
Atneed funeral receivables, net
|
|
|
66,884 |
|
|
|
77,195 |
|
|
Atneed cemetery receivables, net
|
|
|
2,949 |
|
|
|
16,532 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
11,815 |
|
|
|
5,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
97,747 |
|
|
$ |
102,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset and income tax receivable
|
|
$ |
18,499 |
|
|
$ |
40,438 |
|
|
Prepaid insurance
|
|
|
3,407 |
|
|
|
3,720 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
15,621 |
|
|
|
9,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
37,527 |
|
|
$ |
53,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caskets, vaults, urns, markers and bases
|
|
$ |
31,254 |
|
|
$ |
31,898 |
|
Developed land, lawn crypts and mausoleums
|
|
|
37,073 |
|
|
|
49,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
68,327 |
|
|
$ |
81,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery property:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undeveloped land
|
|
$ |
1,107,259 |
|
|
$ |
1,260,859 |
|
|
Developed land, lawn crypts and mausoleums
|
|
|
248,395 |
|
|
|
248,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,355,654 |
|
|
$ |
1,509,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated | |
|
|
(note 2) | |
|
|
| |
Property and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$ |
289,800 |
|
|
$ |
293,961 |
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
1,009,453 |
|
|
|
1,014,034 |
|
|
Operating equipment
|
|
|
262,348 |
|
|
|
249,023 |
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
24,627 |
|
|
|
28,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,586,228 |
|
|
|
1,585,372 |
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(636,054 |
) |
|
|
(606,511 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
950,174 |
|
|
$ |
978,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-88
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated | |
|
|
(note 2) | |
|
|
| |
Deferred charges and other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covenants-not-to-compete, net
|
|
$ |
73,240 |
|
|
$ |
77,549 |
|
|
Cemetery deferred selling expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212,397 |
|
|
Funeral deferred selling expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,371 |
|
|
Investments, net
|
|
|
9,218 |
|
|
|
35,752 |
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
12,056 |
|
|
|
26,707 |
|
|
Notes receivable, net
|
|
|
21,567 |
|
|
|
41,302 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
133,500 |
|
|
|
138,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
249,581 |
|
|
$ |
631,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in Receivables, net on the Companys
consolidated balance sheet is funeral and cemetery atneed
allowances for doubtful accounts of approximately $11,835 and
$12,572 at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Included in Receivables, net in the consolidated balance
sheet is $131 and $138 of notes with employees of the Company
and other related parties at December 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. Interest rates on notes receivable range from 0%
to 18% as of December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
41,160 |
|
|
$ |
46,271 |
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
57,528 |
|
|
|
31,296 |
|
|
Litigation matters
|
|
|
6,850 |
|
|
|
4,280 |
|
|
Restructuring liability
|
|
|
7,375 |
|
|
|
10,663 |
|
|
Accrued dividend
|
|
|
7,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
17,149 |
|
|
|
19,883 |
|
|
Self insurance
|
|
|
49,084 |
|
|
|
47,480 |
|
|
Accrued trust expenses
|
|
|
13,101 |
|
|
|
4,704 |
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
32,031 |
|
|
|
56,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
231,693 |
|
|
$ |
221,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-89
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
Other liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued pension
|
|
$ |
55,642 |
|
|
$ |
50,556 |
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
11,352 |
|
|
|
17,729 |
|
|
Customer refund obligation reserve
|
|
|
66,118 |
|
|
|
74,410 |
|
|
Trust related debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,926 |
|
|
Tax liability
|
|
|
104,981 |
|
|
|
104,981 |
|
|
Indemnification liability
|
|
|
26,750 |
|
|
|
44,480 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
62,142 |
|
|
|
68,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
326,985 |
|
|
$ |
437,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In prior periods, certain costs, specifically salaries and
facility costs, were allocated based upon each of the respective
segments revenue components within goods and services.
During 2005, the Company has further refined its allocation of
the costs described above to more accurately reflect the cost of
goods and services for its funeral and cemetery segments. Such
costs are now allocated based on an hourly factor which
represents the average amount of time spent by employees when
selling or providing goods and services to a consumer. The
Company has made certain disclosure reclassifications to prior
years to conform to the current period presentation. The
disclosure reclassifications made to prior years to conform to
the current period presentation have no effect on the
Companys consolidated financial position, results of
operations or statement of cash flows.
F-90
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The detail of certain income statement accounts is as follows
for the years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
North America good and services revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
$ |
501,794 |
|
|
$ |
505,170 |
|
|
$ |
488,987 |
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
380,990 |
|
|
|
388,683 |
|
|
|
381,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total goods
|
|
|
882,784 |
|
|
|
893,853 |
|
|
|
870,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
613,430 |
|
|
|
585,854 |
|
|
|
626,487 |
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
146,035 |
|
|
|
141,934 |
|
|
|
146,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total services
|
|
|
759,465 |
|
|
|
727,788 |
|
|
|
773,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America goods and services revenues
|
|
|
1,642,249 |
|
|
|
1,621,641 |
|
|
|
1,643,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International revenues
|
|
|
11,793 |
|
|
|
140,962 |
|
|
|
597,127 |
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
61,695 |
|
|
|
68,622 |
|
|
|
72,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$ |
1,715,737 |
|
|
$ |
1,831,225 |
|
|
$ |
2,313,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America goods and services costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
$ |
193,650 |
|
|
$ |
190,971 |
|
|
$ |
186,643 |
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
158,708 |
|
|
|
162,797 |
|
|
|
169,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of goods
|
|
|
352,358 |
|
|
|
353,768 |
|
|
|
355,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
371,618 |
|
|
|
351,302 |
|
|
|
360,023 |
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
96,872 |
|
|
|
99,646 |
|
|
|
105,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of services
|
|
|
468,490 |
|
|
|
450,948 |
|
|
|
465,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America goods and services costs
|
|
|
820,848 |
|
|
|
804,716 |
|
|
|
821,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International costs and expenses
|
|
|
10,334 |
|
|
|
127,720 |
|
|
|
525,907 |
|
Overhead and other expenses
|
|
|
586,410 |
|
|
|
568,775 |
|
|
|
609,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost and expenses
|
|
$ |
1,417,592 |
|
|
$ |
1,501,211 |
|
|
$ |
1,956,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-91
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
Certain Non-Cash Transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
Changes to minimum liability under retirement plans
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(36,636 |
) |
|
$ |
81 |
|
Debenture conversions to common stock
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
217,154 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Common stock contributions to employee 401(k)
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18,127 |
|
|
$ |
17,378 |
|
StoneMor partnership units received in disposition
|
|
$ |
5,900 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Dividends accrued
|
|
$ |
7,415 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Note Nineteen
Basic (loss) earnings per common share (EPS) excludes
dilution and is computed by dividing net (loss) income by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the
period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could
occur if securities or other obligations to issue common stock
were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the
issuance of common stock that then shared in the Companys
(losses) earnings.
F-92
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic
and diluted EPS for the three years ended December 31 is
presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
|
note 2 | |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share | |
|
|
amounts) | |
Income from continuing operations before cumulative
effect of accounting changes (numerator):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before
cumulative effect of accounting changes basic
|
|
$ |
55,474 |
|
|
$ |
119,670 |
|
|
$ |
69,265 |
|
|
|
|
After tax interest on convertible debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before
cumulative effect of accounting changes diluted
|
|
$ |
55,474 |
|
|
$ |
126,070 |
|
|
$ |
69,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income (numerator):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income basic
|
|
$ |
(127,941 |
) |
|
$ |
110,661 |
|
|
$ |
85,074 |
|
|
|
|
After tax interest on convertible debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income diluted
|
|
$ |
(127,941 |
) |
|
$ |
117,061 |
|
|
$ |
85,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares (denominator):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares basic
|
|
|
302,213 |
|
|
|
318,737 |
|
|
|
299,801 |
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
4,399 |
|
|
|
4,091 |
|
|
|
989 |
|
|
|
Convertible debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares diluted
|
|
|
306,745 |
|
|
|
344,675 |
|
|
|
300,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per share from continuing operations before
cumulative effect of accounting changes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
.19 |
|
|
$ |
.38 |
|
|
$ |
.23 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
.18 |
|
|
$ |
.37 |
|
|
$ |
.23 |
|
Income per share from discontinued operations per share, net
of
tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
.01 |
|
|
$ |
.13 |
|
|
$ |
.05 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
.01 |
|
|
$ |
.12 |
|
|
$ |
.05 |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting changes per share, net of
tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
(.62 |
) |
|
$ |
(.16 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
(.61 |
) |
|
$ |
(.15 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Net (loss) income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
(.42 |
) |
|
$ |
.35 |
|
|
$ |
.28 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
(.42 |
) |
|
$ |
.34 |
|
|
$ |
.28 |
|
F-93
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The computation of diluted (loss) earnings per share excludes
outstanding stock options and convertible debt in certain
periods in which the inclusion of such options and debt would be
antidilutive in the periods presented. Total options and
convertible debentures not currently included in the computation
of dilutive (loss) earnings per share for the respective periods
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Antidilutive options
|
|
|
7,039 |
|
|
|
9,559 |
|
|
|
22,097 |
|
Antidilutive convertible debentures
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
47,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common stock equivalents excluded from computations
|
|
|
7,683 |
|
|
|
10,418 |
|
|
|
69,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note Twenty
|
|
|
Gains and Impairment (Losses) on Dispositions, Net and
Other Operating Expense |
As dispositions occur in the normal course of business, gains or
losses on the sale of such businesses are recognized in the
income statement line item Gains and impairment (losses)
on disposition, net. Additionally, as dispositions occur
pursuant to the Companys ongoing asset sale programs,
adjustments are made through this income statement line item to
reflect the difference between actual proceeds received from the
sale compared to the original estimates.
Gains and impairments (losses) on dispositions, net
consists of the following for the years ended
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Gains on dispositions
|
|
$ |
68,167 |
|
|
$ |
66,966 |
|
|
$ |
75,188 |
|
Impairment losses on assets held for sale
|
|
|
(105,867 |
) |
|
|
(49,970 |
) |
|
|
(38,247 |
) |
Changes to previously estimated impairment losses
|
|
|
11,607 |
|
|
|
8,801 |
|
|
|
13,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(26,093 |
) |
|
$ |
25,797 |
|
|
$ |
50,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company entered into
negotiations to dispose of three cemetery locations in Maryland.
Based on the terms of these negotiations, the Company recorded
an impairment loss of $12,892.
The Company incurred various charges related to impairment
losses associated with planned divestitures of certain North
America and international funeral service and cemetery
businesses and reductions in the carrying values of equity
investments from 1999 through 2002. The reserve activity for the
years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilization for | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at | |
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
Balance at | |
|
|
Original | |
|
December 31, | |
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
Charge Amount | |
|
2004 | |
|
Cash | |
|
Non-cash | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Fourth quarter 1999 charges
|
|
$ |
272,544 |
|
|
$ |
10,801 |
|
|
$ |
5,685 |
|
|
$ |
(199 |
) |
|
$ |
5,315 |
|
2001 charges
|
|
|
663,548 |
|
|
|
1,782 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
1,404 |
|
2002 charges
|
|
|
292,979 |
|
|
|
16,454 |
|
|
|
4,533 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
11,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,229,071 |
|
|
$ |
29,037 |
|
|
$ |
10,723 |
|
|
$ |
(230 |
) |
|
$ |
18,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-94
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilization for | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
Balance at | |
|
|
Original | |
|
December 31, | |
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
Charge Amount | |
|
2003 | |
|
Cash | |
|
Non-cash | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Fourth quarter 1999 charges
|
|
$ |
272,544 |
|
|
$ |
18,282 |
|
|
$ |
7,286 |
|
|
$ |
195 |
|
|
$ |
10,801 |
|
2001 charges
|
|
|
663,548 |
|
|
|
3,102 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
811 |
|
|
|
1,782 |
|
2002 charges
|
|
|
292,979 |
|
|
|
24,395 |
|
|
|
6,205 |
|
|
|
1,736 |
|
|
|
16,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,229,071 |
|
|
$ |
45,779 |
|
|
$ |
14,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,742 |
|
|
$ |
29,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The majority of the remaining balance at December 31, 2005
of these original charge amounts relates to actions already
taken by the Company associated with severance costs and
terminated consulting and/or
covenant-not-to-compete
contractual obligations, all of which will be paid by 2012. Of
the $18,544 remaining liability at December 31, 2005,
$5,822 is included in Accounts payable and accrued
liabilities and $12,722 is included in Other liabilities
in the consolidated balance sheet based on the expected
timing of payments. The Company continues to adjust the
estimates of certain items included in the original charge
amounts as better estimates become available or actual
divestitures occur.
|
|
|
Sale of Operations in Chile |
In September 2005, the Company completed the sale of its
cemetery operations in Chile for proceeds of approximately
$106,370. The Company received net cash proceeds of $90,421 upon
completion of the sale and expects to receive additional cash
proceeds of CLP 8,200,226 or approximately $15,949 in 2006. The
Company recognized a pre-tax gain of $249 in Income from
discontinued operations in its consolidated statement of
operations as a result of this transaction. Included in this
gain is a foreign currency gain of $618 on the expected cash
proceeds.
|
|
|
Sales of Assets to StoneMor Partners LP |
In November 2005, the Company sold 21 cemeteries and six funeral
homes to StoneMor Partners LP for $12,748. In the third quarter
of 2005, the Company had classified these properties as held for
sale and recorded an impairment charge in (Loss) gain on
early extinguishment of debt, net in its consolidated
statement of operations of approximately $19,589, net of a
tax benefit of $10,450 in its consolidated statement of
operations. In connection with this sale, the Company received
$6,848 in cash and 280,952 StoneMor Limited Partner units,
valued at $5,900 in November of 2005. The StoneMor Limited
Partner units are recorded at cost in Other current
assets in the consolidated balance sheet at
December 31, 2005. Subsequent to December 31, 2005,
the Company disposed of its investment in StoneMor Limited
Partners LP units for $6,026, resulting in a pretax gain of $126.
|
|
|
Sale of Argentina and Uruguay Operations |
During the second quarter of 2004, the Company recorded an
impairment of its funeral and cemetery operations in Argentina
totaling $15,189 in Income from discontinued operations
in its consolidated statement of operations. As a result of
the sale of the Argentina and Uruguay businesses in the first
quarter of 2005, the Company recorded a gain of $2,041 in
Income from discontinued operations in the consolidated
statement of operations for the year ended December 31,
2004 associated with the revised estimated fair value. The new
carrying amount reflected the fair value based on
then-current market
conditions less estimated costs to sell. Additionally, the
Company recognized a non-cash tax benefit of $49,236 in
discontinued operations during the second quarter of 2004, which
represents the reduction of a previously recorded valuation
allowance. The Company also recognized an additional tax benefit
of $2,629
F-95
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
in discontinued operations during the fourth quarter of 2004,
which represents the revised estimated fair value and
differences between book and tax bases. In the first quarter of
2005, the Company received proceeds of $21,597 related to the
sale of its former operations in Argentina and Uruguay.
|
|
|
Sale of French Operations |
In March 2004, the Company sold 100% of the stock of its French
subsidiary to a newly formed company (NEWCO). In connection with
this sale, the Company acquired a 25% share of the voting
interest of NEWCO, received cash proceeds of $281,667, net of
transaction costs, and received a note receivable in the amount
of EUR 10,000. Also received in this transaction were
EUR 15,000 of preferred equity certificates and
EUR 5,955 of convertible preferred equity certificates. The
sale of stock of the Companys French subsidiary in March
2004 resulted in a pretax gain of $12,639 and a non-cash tax
benefit of $24,929 (described below), resulting in an after tax
gain of $37,568. The Company accounted for the sale of its
French subsidiary in accordance with the guidance set forth in
EITF 01-2,
Interpretations of APB Opinion No. 29,
Issues 8(a) and 8(b). Consequently, the Company deferred
approximately 25% of the gain associated with the sale of its
French subsidiary representing the economic interest it obtained
in that subsidiary through its ownership of approximately 25% of
NEWCO.
In July 2004, the Company paid $6,219 pursuant to the joint
venture agreement, as a purchase price adjustment, which reduced
the pretax gain to $6,420 and reduced the after tax gain to
$33,624 as summarized below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation | |
|
Adjustment in | |
|
|
|
|
Q1 2004 | |
|
Q2 2004 | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Pretax gain (loss)
|
|
$ |
12,639 |
|
|
$ |
(6,219 |
) |
|
$ |
6,420 |
|
Tax benefit
|
|
|
(24,929 |
) |
|
|
(2,275 |
) |
|
|
(27,204 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After tax gain (loss)
|
|
$ |
37,568 |
|
|
$ |
(3,944 |
) |
|
$ |
33,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $24,929 non-cash tax benefit associated with the sale of the
Companys French subsidiary is primarily attributable to
the reduction of $18,610 of tax accruals, which were accrued as
an indemnification liability upon the sale of the Companys
French subsidiary. The remaining amount of $6,319 was a non-cash
tax benefit associated with the difference between book and tax
bases.
Included in the pretax gain, the Company recognized $35,768 of
contractual obligations related to representation and warranties
and other indemnifications resulting from the joint venture
contract. During 2004, $2,400 in charges were applied to the
indemnification and related primarily to foreign taxes and legal
expenses. The Company applied $2,105 to the indemnifications
during 2005. In the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company released
tax indemnification liabilities of approximately $7,125. For
more information regarding these representations and warranties
and other indemnifications, see note fourteen. Also, goodwill in
the amount of $23,467 was removed from the Companys
consolidated balance sheet as a result of this transaction.
NEWCO completed refinancings in May 2005 and July 2005 in order
to reduce its cost of debt. Included in this refinancing was the
repayment of the note payable to the Company plus interest and
the redemption of the Companys investment in preferred
equity certificates and convertible preferred equity
certificates and associated interest, which were received in the
original disposition. In the second quarter of 2005, the Company
received $32,070 related to the note payable and preferred
equity certificates with associated interest of $3,064. In the
third quarter of 2005, the Company received additional proceeds
of $7,604 on convertible preferred equity certificates. The
Companys investment in common stock and 25% voting
interest remain unchanged following this transaction.
F-96
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
Proceeds from Investment in United Kingdom Company and
Others |
During the second quarter of 2004, the Company received proceeds
of $53,839 from the sale of its minority interest equity
investment in the United Kingdom and the prepayment of its note
receivable, with accrued interest, following a successful public
offering transaction of its United Kingdom company.
Associated with the disposition, the Company recognized income
of $41,163, recorded in Gains and impairment (losses) on
dispositions, net, in the consolidated statement of
operations ($27,179 to adjust the carrying amount of the
receivable from its former United Kingdom company to its
realizable value and $13,984 as a pretax gain as a result of the
sale). This pretax gain was reduced by an accrual for the
tax-related indemnification liabilities of $8,000. In addition,
the Company recognized interest income on the receivable in the
amount of $4,478 and a foreign currency gain of $198 recorded in
Other income, net in the consolidated statement of
operations and recognized a non-cash tax benefit of $8,000
recorded in Gains and impairment (losses) on disposition, net
in the consolidated statement of operations. This pretax
gain is attributable to the reduction of the tax related accrual
upon the release of a contingency, which was accrued as an
indemnification liability in the second quarter of 2004.
The most significant items in 2003 related to the Company
selling its equity investments in Australia and Spain for gains
of $45,776 and $8,090, respectively.
For the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company recorded
Other operating expenses of $9,004, primarily consisting
of $6,859 of severance costs for former employees. The charges
related to 350 employees involuntarily terminated in North
America, were in accordance with the Companys existing
post-employment severance policies.
Note Twenty-One
During the first quarter of 2005, the Company disposed of its
funeral and cemetery operations in Argentina and Uruguay. During
the third quarter of 2005, the Company also disposed of its
cemetery operations in Chile. Accordingly, the operations in
these countries are classified as discontinued operations for
all periods presented.
F-97
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company has fully hedged an income tax receivable
denominated in Chilean pesos; therefore, the Company has no
foreign exchange rate risk associated with this receivable. The
fair market value hedge, which is effective, is recorded at
market value at December 31, 2005. Currency fluctuations
associated with this hedge resulted in a gain of $389, net of a
tax provision of $229, which is included in Income from
discontinued operations in the Companys consolidated
statement of operations for the year ended December 31,
2005. This hedge will expire June 30, 2006. For more
information on this hedge, see note twelve to these consolidated
financial statements. The provision for income taxes during 2005
was negatively impacted by differences between book and tax
bases related to the sale of the Companys operations in
Chile. The benefit for income taxes in 2004 includes a non-cash
tax benefit of $49,236, which represents the reduction of a
previously recorded valuation allowance related to the sale of
the Companys operations in Argentina. The results of the
Companys discontinued operations for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
22,891 |
|
|
$ |
44,519 |
|
|
$ |
38,111 |
|
Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions, net
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
(13,148 |
) |
|
|
34 |
|
Costs and other expenses
|
|
|
(14,253 |
) |
|
|
(38,962 |
) |
|
|
(20,460 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income
taxes
|
|
|
8,887 |
|
|
|
(7,591 |
) |
|
|
17,685 |
|
(Provision) benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
(4,764 |
) |
|
|
49,175 |
|
|
|
(1,876 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
$ |
4,123 |
|
|
$ |
41,584 |
|
|
$ |
15,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2005, the Company had no assets or
liabilities related to discontinued operations. Net
(liabilities) and assets of discontinued operations at
December 31, 2004 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net of allowances
|
|
$ |
3,084 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
8,001 |
|
|
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
1,412 |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost, net
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
Deferred charges and other assets
|
|
|
2,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
15,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(901 |
) |
|
Accrued liabilities and other current liabilities
|
|
|
(6,210 |
) |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(13,190 |
) |
|
Other liabilities and deferred credits
|
|
|
(45,035 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
(65,336 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
(49,884 |
) |
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
67,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets of discontinued operations, net of foreign currency
translation
|
|
$ |
17,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-98
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note Twenty-Two
|
|
|
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) |
The Company is restating herein its unaudited quarterly
financial data for each of the interim periods of 2005 and 2004.
See note two to the consolidated financial statements for
further information relating to this restatement.
Quarterly financial data for 2005 and 2004 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter | |
|
Second Quarter | |
|
Third Quarter | |
|
Fourth Quarter | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Note 2 | |
|
|
|
Note 2 | |
|
|
|
Note 2 | |
|
|
|
Note 2 | |
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
447,442 |
|
|
|
447,442 |
|
|
$ |
431,710 |
|
|
|
431,842 |
|
|
$ |
406,369 |
|
|
$ |
406,369 |
|
|
$ |
430,084 |
|
|
$ |
430,084 |
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(350,215 |
) |
|
|
(349,642 |
) |
|
|
(359,367 |
) |
|
|
(358,798 |
) |
|
|
(348,094 |
) |
|
|
(347,526 |
) |
|
|
(359,102 |
) |
|
|
(361,626 |
) |
Gross profits
|
|
|
97,227 |
|
|
|
97,800 |
|
|
|
72,343 |
|
|
|
73,044 |
|
|
|
58,275 |
|
|
|
58,843 |
|
|
|
70,982 |
|
|
|
68,458 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
71,770 |
|
|
|
72,352 |
|
|
|
54,377 |
|
|
|
55,087 |
|
|
|
11,076 |
|
|
|
11,653 |
|
|
|
50,699 |
|
|
|
48,126 |
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and
cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
48,755 |
|
|
|
48,988 |
|
|
|
19,916 |
|
|
|
20,277 |
|
|
|
(10,302 |
) |
|
|
(10,074 |
) |
|
|
32,438 |
|
|
|
29,516 |
|
(Provision) benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
(17,338 |
) |
|
|
(17,520 |
) |
|
|
(9,324 |
) |
|
|
(9,553 |
) |
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
(8,591 |
) |
|
|
(7,045 |
) |
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
|
31,417 |
|
|
|
31,468 |
|
|
|
10,592 |
|
|
|
10,724 |
|
|
|
(9,171 |
) |
|
|
(9,189 |
) |
|
|
23,847 |
|
|
|
22,471 |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change
|
|
|
(187,538 |
) |
|
|
(187,538 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(154,946 |
) |
|
|
(154,895 |
) |
|
|
13,705 |
|
|
|
13,837 |
|
|
|
(9,634 |
) |
|
|
(9,652 |
) |
|
|
24,145 |
|
|
|
22,769 |
|
(Loss) earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS
|
|
|
(.49 |
) |
|
|
(.49 |
) |
|
|
.05 |
|
|
|
.05 |
|
|
|
(.03 |
) |
|
|
(.03 |
) |
|
|
.08 |
|
|
|
.08 |
|
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
|
(.49 |
) |
|
|
(.49 |
) |
|
|
.04 |
|
|
|
.05 |
|
|
|
(.03 |
) |
|
|
(.03 |
) |
|
|
.08 |
|
|
|
.07 |
|
F-99
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter | |
|
Second Quarter | |
|
Third Quarter | |
|
Fourth Quarter | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
As | |
|
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Note 2 | |
|
|
|
Note 2 | |
|
|
|
Note 2 | |
|
|
|
Note 2 | |
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
581,671 |
|
|
$ |
581,671 |
|
|
$ |
425,740 |
|
|
$ |
425,740 |
|
|
$ |
397,186 |
|
|
$ |
397,186 |
|
|
$ |
426,628 |
|
|
$ |
426,628 |
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(467,707 |
) |
|
|
(467,336 |
) |
|
|
(353,686 |
) |
|
|
(353,315 |
) |
|
|
(328,891 |
) |
|
|
(328,519 |
) |
|
|
(352,412 |
) |
|
|
(352,041 |
) |
Gross profits
|
|
|
113,964 |
|
|
|
114,335 |
|
|
|
72,054 |
|
|
|
72,425 |
|
|
|
68,295 |
|
|
|
68,667 |
|
|
|
74,216 |
|
|
|
74,587 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
97,728 |
|
|
|
98,102 |
|
|
|
49,543 |
|
|
|
49,917 |
|
|
|
39,716 |
|
|
|
40,091 |
|
|
|
36,443 |
|
|
|
36,817 |
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
cumulative effects of accounting changes
|
|
|
72,226 |
|
|
|
72,255 |
|
|
|
2,784 |
|
|
|
2,812 |
|
|
|
17,362 |
|
|
|
17,391 |
|
|
|
19,534 |
|
|
|
19,562 |
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
|
|
|
4,184 |
|
|
|
4,092 |
|
|
|
7,329 |
|
|
|
7,264 |
|
|
|
(4,336 |
) |
|
|
(4,526 |
) |
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
820 |
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effects of
accounting changes
|
|
|
76,410 |
|
|
|
76,347 |
|
|
|
10,113 |
|
|
|
10,076 |
|
|
|
13,026 |
|
|
|
12,865 |
|
|
|
20,551 |
|
|
|
20,382 |
|
Cumulative effects of accounting changes
|
|
|
(47,556 |
) |
|
|
(50,593 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
30,136 |
|
|
|
27,036 |
|
|
|
42,952 |
|
|
|
42,915 |
|
|
|
13,876 |
|
|
|
13,715 |
|
|
|
27,164 |
|
|
|
26,995 |
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS
|
|
|
.10 |
|
|
|
.09 |
|
|
|
.14 |
|
|
|
.14 |
|
|
|
.04 |
|
|
|
.04 |
|
|
|
.08 |
|
|
|
.08 |
|
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
|
.10 |
|
|
|
.09 |
|
|
|
.14 |
|
|
|
.14 |
|
|
|
.04 |
|
|
|
.04 |
|
|
|
.08 |
|
|
|
.08 |
|
F-100
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING
ACCOUNTS
Three Years Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged | |
|
Charged | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at | |
|
(Credited) to | |
|
(Credited) to | |
|
|
|
Balance At | |
|
|
Beginning | |
|
Costs and | |
|
Other | |
|
|
|
End Of | |
Description |
|
of Period | |
|
Expenses | |
|
Accounts(2) | |
|
Write-Offs(1) | |
|
Period | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Current provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
12,572 |
|
|
$ |
9,470 |
|
|
$ |
(39 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,168 |
) |
|
$ |
11,835 |
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
15,348 |
|
|
|
(3,376 |
) |
|
|
8,757 |
|
|
|
(8,157 |
) |
|
|
12,572 |
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2003
|
|
|
22,697 |
|
|
|
7,627 |
|
|
|
(720 |
) |
|
|
(14,256 |
) |
|
|
15,348 |
|
Due After One Year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
33,362 |
|
|
$ |
(111 |
) |
|
$ |
(25,939 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,312 |
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
55,029 |
|
|
|
(21,502 |
) |
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,362 |
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2003
|
|
|
29,030 |
|
|
|
1,813 |
|
|
|
24,675 |
|
|
|
(489 |
) |
|
|
55,029 |
|
Preneed Funeral and Preneed Cemetery Asset:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
53,340 |
|
|
$ |
(749 |
) |
|
$ |
7,767 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
60,358 |
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
387,150 |
|
|
|
(17,772 |
) |
|
|
(316,038 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,340 |
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2003
|
|
|
357,761 |
|
|
|
17,466 |
|
|
|
11,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387,150 |
|
Deferred Preneed Funeral and Cemetery Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
(112,290 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
288 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(112,002 |
) |
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
(369,980 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
257,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(112,290 |
) |
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2003
|
|
|
(339,339 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,641 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(369,980 |
) |
Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
43,908 |
|
|
$ |
(9,079 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
34,829 |
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
35,859 |
|
|
|
8,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,908 |
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2003
|
|
|
156,372 |
|
|
|
2,966 |
|
|
|
(123,479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,859 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Uncollected receivables written off, net of recoveries. |
|
(2) |
Primarily relates to cumulative effect of accounting change and
acquisitions and dispositions of operations. Deferred tax
valuation allowance in 2003 was reclassified to other deferred
tax liabilities with no change to net deferred income taxes. |
F-101
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Expressed in thousands of dollars
except number of shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 17, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
ASSETS |
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
8,400 |
|
|
$ |
7,455 |
|
|
Receivables, net of allowances
|
|
|
51,244 |
|
|
|
52,862 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
15,282 |
|
|
|
15,784 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
8,325 |
|
|
|
6,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,251 |
|
|
|
82,986 |
|
Pre-need funeral receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
338,052 |
|
|
|
334,427 |
|
Pre-need cemetery receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
301,621 |
|
|
|
307,322 |
|
Cemetery property
|
|
|
116,096 |
|
|
|
116,467 |
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
540,954 |
|
|
|
542,901 |
|
Insurance invested assets
|
|
|
298,392 |
|
|
|
294,598 |
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
19,477 |
|
|
|
13,057 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
295,913 |
|
|
|
295,890 |
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments
|
|
|
243,980 |
|
|
|
243,805 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
43,053 |
|
|
|
42,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,280,789 |
|
|
$ |
2,274,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$ |
113,984 |
|
|
$ |
119,734 |
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
2,271 |
|
|
|
2,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,255 |
|
|
|
122,169 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
355,958 |
|
|
|
371,040 |
|
Deferred pre-need funeral and cemetery contract revenue
|
|
|
75,830 |
|
|
|
91,618 |
|
Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts
|
|
|
564,447 |
|
|
|
548,497 |
|
Insurance policy liabilities
|
|
|
285,701 |
|
|
|
266,729 |
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
10,744 |
|
|
|
10,552 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
28,471 |
|
|
|
21,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,437,406 |
|
|
|
1,432,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts
|
|
|
245,221 |
|
|
|
243,962 |
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares
authorized, 40,674,363 issued and outstanding (December 31,
2005 40,458,864)
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
745,670 |
|
|
|
743,126 |
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(167,749 |
) |
|
|
(172,405 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
19,834 |
|
|
|
26,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
598,162 |
|
|
|
597,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,280,789 |
|
|
$ |
2,274,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the interim consolidated financial
statements
F-102
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited)
Expressed in thousands of dollars
except per share amounts and number of shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Weeks Ended | |
|
24 Weeks Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
June 17, | |
|
June 18, | |
|
June 17, | |
|
June 18, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
$ |
107,522 |
|
|
$ |
110,501 |
|
|
$ |
228,653 |
|
|
$ |
234,514 |
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
41,505 |
|
|
|
43,914 |
|
|
|
79,336 |
|
|
|
82,218 |
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
23,417 |
|
|
|
22,363 |
|
|
|
46,272 |
|
|
|
43,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172,444 |
|
|
|
176,778 |
|
|
|
354,261 |
|
|
|
360,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
87,421 |
|
|
|
90,416 |
|
|
|
182,783 |
|
|
|
184,529 |
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
35,281 |
|
|
|
36,640 |
|
|
|
68,438 |
|
|
|
69,824 |
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
22,282 |
|
|
|
21,532 |
|
|
|
44,189 |
|
|
|
41,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,984 |
|
|
|
148,588 |
|
|
|
295,410 |
|
|
|
296,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,460 |
|
|
|
28,190 |
|
|
|
58,851 |
|
|
|
64,492 |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
18,042 |
|
|
|
1,702 |
|
|
|
32,557 |
|
|
|
12,346 |
|
Provision for asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(408 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,627 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,042 |
|
|
|
1,294 |
|
|
|
32,557 |
|
|
|
10,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
9,418 |
|
|
|
26,896 |
|
|
|
26,294 |
|
|
|
53,773 |
|
Interest on long-term debt (Note 3)
|
|
|
6,471 |
|
|
|
7,013 |
|
|
|
12,949 |
|
|
|
14,528 |
|
Other expense (income), net
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
(5,843 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
2,662 |
|
|
|
19,927 |
|
|
|
13,216 |
|
|
|
45,088 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
2,509 |
|
|
|
7,001 |
|
|
|
7,318 |
|
|
|
18,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
12,926 |
|
|
|
5,898 |
|
|
|
26,895 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations (Note 10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(845 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
12,081 |
|
|
|
5,898 |
|
|
|
25,217 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
153 |
|
|
$ |
12,081 |
|
|
$ |
4,656 |
|
|
$ |
25,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per Common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per Common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding (thousands)
|
|
|
40,652 |
|
|
|
40,108 |
|
|
|
40,559 |
|
|
|
40,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding (thousands)
|
|
|
42,677 |
|
|
|
41,390 |
|
|
|
42,422 |
|
|
|
41,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the interim consolidated financial
statements
F-103
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(unaudited)
Expressed in thousands of dollars except number of shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common | |
|
Capital in | |
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Par | |
|
Excess of | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Value | |
|
Par Value | |
|
Deficit | |
|
Income | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
40,458,864 |
|
|
$ |
405 |
|
|
$ |
743,126 |
|
|
$ |
(172,405 |
) |
|
$ |
26,627 |
|
|
$ |
597,753 |
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,656 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of income taxes of
$nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,110 |
|
|
|
3,110 |
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on insurance invested assets, net of tax
recovery of $5,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,064 |
) |
|
|
(10,064 |
) |
|
|
Unrealized loss on derivatives, net of income taxes of $nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
|
Less: reclassification adjustments for realized gains on
derivatives included in net income, net of income taxes of $nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(644 |
) |
|
|
(644 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,137 |
) |
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,596 |
|
Common stock issued:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued as compensation in lieu of cash
|
|
|
7,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
Stock issued under equity incentive plan
|
|
|
207,500 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 17, 2006
|
|
|
40,674,363 |
|
|
$ |
407 |
|
|
$ |
745,670 |
|
|
$ |
(167,749 |
) |
|
$ |
19,834 |
|
|
$ |
598,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the interim consolidated financial
statements
F-104
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)
Expressed in thousands of dollars
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Weeks Ended | |
|
24 Weeks Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
June 17, | |
|
June 18, | |
|
June 17, | |
|
June 18, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
CASH PROVIDED BY (APPLIED TO)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
153 |
|
|
$ |
12,081 |
|
|
$ |
4,656 |
|
|
$ |
25,217 |
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,678 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Items not affecting cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
9,756 |
|
|
|
10,958 |
|
|
|
19,266 |
|
|
|
21,095 |
|
|
|
Amortization of debt issue costs
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
908 |
|
|
|
1,650 |
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance policy benefit reserves
|
|
|
11,047 |
|
|
|
12,088 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
22,652 |
|
|
|
Provision for asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(408 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,627 |
) |
|
|
Gain on disposal of business assets
|
|
|
(774 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(958 |
) |
|
|
(5,903 |
) |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
6,303 |
|
|
|
(256 |
) |
|
|
12,749 |
|
|
Premium on long-term debt repurchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
Other, including net changes in other non-cash balances
|
|
|
(1,942 |
) |
|
|
(13,824 |
) |
|
|
(6,130 |
) |
|
|
(6,852 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by continuing operations
|
|
|
19,870 |
|
|
|
28,716 |
|
|
|
40,324 |
|
|
|
70,941 |
|
Net cash used in discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(811 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(601 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,870 |
|
|
|
27,905 |
|
|
|
40,324 |
|
|
|
70,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds on disposition of business assets
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
2,907 |
|
|
|
11,158 |
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(4,718 |
) |
|
|
(11,709 |
) |
|
|
(9,473 |
) |
|
|
(16,314 |
) |
|
Purchase of insurance invested assets
|
|
|
(20,270 |
) |
|
|
(17,170 |
) |
|
|
(43,635 |
) |
|
|
(65,231 |
) |
|
Proceeds on disposition and maturities of insurance invested
assets
|
|
|
9,301 |
|
|
|
9,712 |
|
|
|
25,276 |
|
|
|
47,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in continuing operations
|
|
|
(14,815 |
) |
|
|
(18,497 |
) |
|
|
(24,925 |
) |
|
|
(22,896 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,815 |
) |
|
|
(11,753 |
) |
|
|
(24,925 |
) |
|
|
(14,990 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,151 |
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
|
|
(5,521 |
) |
|
|
(22,136 |
) |
|
|
(15,247 |
) |
|
|
(59,208 |
) |
|
Issuance of Common stock
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
1,107 |
|
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in continuing operations
|
|
|
(4,795 |
) |
|
|
(21,029 |
) |
|
|
(14,454 |
) |
|
|
(52,682 |
) |
|
Net cash used in discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,795 |
) |
|
|
(21,040 |
) |
|
|
(14,454 |
) |
|
|
(52,739 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
(4,888 |
) |
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
2,611 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
8,140 |
|
|
|
16,878 |
|
|
|
7,455 |
|
|
|
9,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$ |
8,400 |
|
|
$ |
11,990 |
|
|
$ |
8,400 |
|
|
$ |
11,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the interim consolidated financial
statements
F-105
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
|
|
NOTE 1. |
NATURE OF OPERATIONS |
Alderwoods Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Alderwoods
Group and, together with its subsidiaries unless the
context otherwise requires, the Company), is the
second-largest operator of funeral homes and cemeteries in North
America based on total revenue and number of locations. As of
June 17, 2006, the Company operated 579 funeral homes, 72
cemeteries and 61 combination funeral homes and cemeteries
throughout North America.
The Companys funeral operations encompass making funeral
and cremation arrangements on an at-need or pre-need basis. The
Companys funeral operations offer a full range of funeral
services, including the collection of remains, registration of
death, professional embalming, use of funeral home facilities,
sale of caskets and other merchandise and transportation to a
place of worship, funeral chapel, cemetery or crematorium.
The Companys cemetery operations assist families in making
burial arrangements and offer a complete line of cemetery
products (including a selection of burial spaces, burial vaults,
lawn crypts, caskets, memorials, niches, mausoleum crypts and
other merchandise), the opening and closing of graves and
cremation services.
The Companys insurance operations sell a variety of
insurance products, primarily to fund pre-need funeral services.
|
|
NOTE 2. |
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
|
|
|
Principles of consolidation |
The interim consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of the Company, its subsidiary companies and operations
controlled by the Company through sales and management
agreements. All subsidiaries are wholly owned, except for a few
companies with small minority interests. The interim
consolidated financial statements also include the accounts of
the funeral trusts, cemetery merchandise and service trusts and
perpetual care trusts, and several pooled investment funds
created for such trusts in which the Company has a variable
interest and is the primary beneficiary.
All significant inter-entity balances and transactions have been
eliminated in the interim consolidated financial statements. The
interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared
using the United States dollar and are presented in accordance
with United States generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP).
The interim consolidated financial statements include all
adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments,
which in managements opinion are necessary for a fair
presentation of the financial results as of June 17, 2006,
and for the 12 and 24 weeks ended June 17, 2006, and
June 18, 2005. The interim consolidated financial
statements have been prepared on a basis consistent with the
accounting policies described in the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K for the
52 weeks ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
and should be read in conjunction therewith.
The results of operations for interim periods are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for
the full fiscal year or for any other interim period.
F-106
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
The preparation of the interim consolidated financial statements
in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the interim consolidated financial statements,
and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the
reporting period. As a result, actual amounts could
significantly differ from those estimates.
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation plans |
Director Compensation Plan
Pursuant to the Companys Director Compensation Plan (the
Director Compensation Plan), each director of the
Company who is not an employee of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries has the option of receiving his or her annual base
retainer and attendance fees in cash, Common Stock or a
combination thereof. Further, each participant may elect to have
Common Stock paid in the form of deferred Common Stock
(Deferred Stock), which will be credited to a
booking account in the name of the participant. The Deferred
Stock is subject to a deferral period during which the
participant has no right to transfer any rights under his or her
Deferred Stock and has no other rights of ownership therein. The
Company has reserved 100,000 shares of Common Stock for
issuance as compensation in lieu of cash under the Director
Compensation Plan.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
In 2005, the Companys shareholders approved the adoption
of a compensatory employee stock purchase plan to provide for
the purchase on the open market of up to a maximum of
1,100,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company. Eligible
employees may authorize payroll deductions of up to 5% of their
regular base salary to purchase shares of Common Stock of the
Company on the open market on a monthly basis. The Company will
make a cash contribution to purchase shares of Common Stock of
the Company as additional compensation to each participant equal
to 50% of the employees contribution for that month. For
the 12 weeks ended June 17, 2006, a total of
19,062 shares were purchased and distributed to employees
at an average price of $19.27 per share and compensation
expense of $122,000 was incurred. For the 24 weeks ended
June 17, 2006, a total of 47,096 shares were purchased
and distributed to employees at an average price of
$17.70 per share and compensation expense of $277,000 was
incurred.
2005-2007 Executive Strategic Incentive Plan
The 2005-2007 Executive Strategic Incentive Plan, approved by
the Board of Directors on July 21, 2005, is a performance
based compensation plan designed to motivate and reward the
senior management team for achieving shareholder value
objectives. The plan provides cash awards to the senior
executives based on the Companys Common Stock reaching the
threshold of an average price of $17.00 for the period from
December 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007. The amount of
the cash award increases the more the stock price exceeds the
$17.00 threshold target price. Each participant will be assigned
a percentage share of an aggregate cash award incentive pool.
Achieving an average stock price of $17.00 results in an
aggregate cash award of $5,600,000. Achieving an average stock
price of $18.00 results in an aggregate cash award of
$8,000,000. The aggregate cash award increases by
$1.6 million for every $1.00 in appreciation of the average
stock price beyond $18.00. In the event of a change in control
of the Company, the cash awards would be calculated based upon
the stock price on the date of the change in control and become
payable within 30 days of the change in control.
F-107
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
2005 Equity Incentive Plan
In April of 2005, the Companys shareholders approved the
2005 Equity Incentive Plan that permits the grant of
(i) options to the employees and members of the
Companys Board of Directors, with or without tandem
appreciation rights, and (ii) restricted Common Stock
units. A total of 1,800,000 shares of Common Stock are
reserved for grant under the plan. Stock options are granted
with an exercise price equal to the Common Stocks fair
market value on the date of the grant. Stock options granted to
date have a 3-year
vesting period and vest at a rate of 25% on the first, 25% on
the second and 50% on the third anniversaries of the date of
grant.
The tandem appreciation rights entitle the employee to exchange
the employees option right for a number of shares equal in
value to the appreciated value of the options. The exchange of
the option for the tandem appreciation right requires an
immediate exercise of the tandem appreciation right and will
cause the immediate termination of the related option right. An
exchange of an option right for a tandem appreciation right may
only be made when the relevant option is otherwise exercisable.
Although the options granted had an exercise price equal to or
greater than the market value of the underlying Common Stock on
the grant date, the number of shares to be issued upon exercise
is not determinable as it is dependent upon the exchange of the
option for a tandem appreciation right.
The restricted Common Stock units granted to date do not vest
for the first three years following the date of grant.
Thereafter, the restricted Common Stock units vest during years
3 to 10 based upon the share price of the Companys Common
Stock. After three years of service, the restricted Common Stock
units vest 70% at a $17 share price, and an additional 15%
at a $17.50 share price and the final 15% at an
$18 share price. Once granted, the restricted Common Stock
units are not included in total shares outstanding and are not
included in the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding in each period used to calculate basic earnings per
share until vested.
2002 Equity Incentive Plan
On January 2, 2002 the Company implemented the 2002 Equity
Incentive Plan that permits the grants of stock options to the
employees and members of the Companys Board of Directors.
A total of 4,500,000 shares of Common Stock are reserved
for grant under the plan. Stock options are granted with an
exercise price equal to the stocks fair market value at
the date of grant. Except in certain cases, stock options have a
3-year vesting period
and vest at a rate of 25% on the first, 25% on the second and
50% on the third anniversaries of the date of grant.
|
|
|
Equity incentive plans and change in accounting
policy |
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for
employee stock-based awards under the intrinsic value method,
which followed the recognition and measurement principles of APB
Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,
and related Interpretations. Effective January 1, 2006, the
Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
No. 123R, Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123R). SFAS 123R requires
measurement of compensation cost for employee stock-based awards
based upon fair value over the requisite service period for
awards expected to vest. Furthermore, under SFAS 123R,
liability based awards are recorded at fair value through to
their settlement date.
Pursuant to the provisions of SFAS 123R, the Company
applied the modified-prospective transition method. Under this
method, the fair value provisions of SFAS 123R are applied
to new employee share-based payment awards granted or awards
modified, repurchased or cancelled after December 31, 2005.
Measurement and attribution of compensation cost for unvested
awards at December 31, 2005, granted
F-108
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, are recognized based
upon the provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123), after
adjustment for estimated forfeitures. Accordingly,
SFAS 123R no longer permits pro-forma disclosure for income
statement periods after December 31, 2005 and compensation
expense will be recognized for all share-based payments earned
after December 31, 2005 based on grant-date fair value.
The fair value of restricted stock units and the fair value of
stock options are determined using the Black-Scholes valuation
model, which is consistent with the valuation techniques
previously utilized for options in the footnote disclosures
required under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by SFAS No. 148,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition
and Disclosure. The Company recorded stock-based compensation
expense for equity incentive plans of $708,000 and $1,596,000
for the 12 and 24 weeks ended June 17, 2006,
respectively. This resulted in an adjustment to operating cash
flows of $708,000 and $1,596,000 in the 12 and 24 weeks
ended June 17, 2006, respectively. The tax benefit
associated with compensation expense for the 12 weeks and
24 weeks ended June 17, 2006 is not significant and no
option value has been capitalized.
|
|
|
Executive strategic incentive plan |
Prior to the implementation of SFAS 123R, no compensation
expense was recorded in the 52 weeks ended
December 31, 2005 as the stock price at December 31,
2005 was less than the threshold target price for the Executive
Strategic Incentive Plan.
With the adoption of SFAS 123R, this incentive plan is
classified as a liability based award resulting in the
measurement of the estimated fair value at each reporting date,
until December 31, 2007 when the actual liability is
determined and the award is settled. The Company records an
expense equal to the portion of the fair value relative to the
vesting term of the plan. The Company determines the fair value
using a Monte Carlo model. This model uses
term-to-expiry and
stock price assumptions as at the measurement date, together
with expected volatility, risk-free interest rate and dividend
yield assumptions consistent with the valuation of the
Companys stock options. The adoption of SFAS 123R
resulted in a cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle of $1,242,000, which reflects the estimated accrued
liability as of January 1, 2006 (fair value of $6,624,000,
based on a stock price of $15.87), the adoption date of
SFAS 123R. Compensation expense of $1,511,000 and
$2,964,000 in the 12 weeks and 24 weeks ended
June 17, 2006, respectively, reflects the estimated accrued
liability as of June 17, 2006 of $4,206,000 (fair value of
$11,216,000, based on a stock price of $19.39).
As a result of the adoption of SFAS 123R, for the
12 weeks ended June 17, 2006, income from continuing
operations before income taxes was reduced by $2,208,000, income
from continuing operations was reduced by $2,117,000, and net
income was reduced by $2,117,000. For the 24 weeks ended
June 17, 2006, income from continuing operations before
income tax was reduced by $4,092,000, income from continuing
operations was reduced by $4,068,000, and net income was reduced
by $5,310,000. Basic and diluted earnings per share were both
reduced by $0.05 and $0.13 for the 12 and 24 weeks ended
June 17, 2006, respectively.
F-109
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
As the Company adopted the modified prospective-transition
method of SFAS 123R, results for the 12 and 24 weeks
ended June 18, 2005 have not been restated. If prior to
December 31, 2005, the Company had elected to recognize
compensation expense for its stock option plans, based on the
fair value of the awards at the grant dates in accordance with
SFAS 123, net income and basic and diluted earnings per
share would have changed for the 12 and 24 weeks ended
June 18, 2005 to the following pro-forma amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Weeks Ended | |
|
24 Weeks Ended | |
|
|
June 18, 2005 | |
|
June 18, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Net income, as reported
|
|
$ |
12,081 |
|
|
$ |
25,217 |
|
Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under
fair value-based method, net of tax
|
|
|
(382 |
) |
|
|
(948 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
$ |
11,699 |
|
|
$ |
24,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per Common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic, as reported
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
Basic, pro forma
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
0.61 |
|
|
Diluted, as reported
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
0.61 |
|
|
Diluted, pro forma
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
|
The following is a summary of the total number of outstanding
stock options and restricted Common Stock units under both plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Non vested | |
|
|
|
|
Outstanding | |
|
Weighted Average | |
|
Restricted Common | |
|
Weighted Average | |
|
|
Options | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
Stock Units | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(dollars per | |
|
|
|
(dollars per | |
|
|
(thousands) | |
|
Common share) | |
|
(thousands) | |
|
Common share) | |
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
5,031 |
|
|
$ |
10.75 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
$ |
15.99 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
3.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
13.36 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
15.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 17, 2006
|
|
|
4,805 |
|
|
$ |
11.03 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
$ |
15.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding at June 17, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Remaining | |
|
Average | |
|
Number | |
|
Exercise | |
Range of Exercise Prices | |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Contractual Life | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Price | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(dollars per Common share) | |
|
(thousands) | |
|
(in years) | |
|
(dollars per | |
|
(thousands) | |
|
(dollars per | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common share) | |
|
|
|
Common share) | |
|
$3.65 $5.96 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
6.78 |
|
|
$ |
3.65 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
$ |
3.65 |
|
|
$5.97 $7.59 |
|
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
6.02 |
|
|
|
7.47 |
|
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
7.47 |
|
|
$7.60 $13.23 |
|
|
|
2,035 |
|
|
|
6.11 |
|
|
|
12.95 |
|
|
|
1,767 |
|
|
|
13.15 |
|
|
$13.24 $15.99 |
|
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
9.11 |
|
|
|
15.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,805 |
|
|
|
6.83 |
|
|
|
11.03 |
|
|
|
3,516 |
|
|
|
9.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-110
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
As of June 17, 2006, the aggregate intrinsic value for
stock options outstanding and exercisable was $40,151,000 and
$34,610,000, respectively.
For the 24 weeks ended June 17, 2006, cash received
from the exercise of stock options was $790,000. As of
June 17, 2006, the unrecognized compensation expense
related to stock options totaling $8,765,000 is expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of 1.3 years.
Other information pertaining to option activity is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Weeks Ended | |
|
24 Weeks Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
June 17, | |
|
June 18, | |
|
June 17, | |
|
June 18, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total fair value of stock options vested
|
|
$ |
821 |
|
|
$ |
398 |
|
|
$ |
1,776 |
|
|
$ |
1,209 |
|
Total intrinsic value of stock options exercised
|
|
|
3,140 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
3,202 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
The fair value of stock options used to compute the pro forma
net income and income per Common share disclosures was
calculated as of the grant date. To calculate fair value, the
Company used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the
following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Weeks Ended | |
|
24 Weeks Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
June 17, | |
|
June 18, | |
|
June 17, | |
|
June 18, | |
Weighted-average assumptions |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Dividend yield
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Expected volatility
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
45.0 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
45.0 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
3.64 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
3.64 |
% |
Expected option life in years
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Weighted average grant date fair value
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
$ |
6.70 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
$ |
6.70 |
|
During the 24 weeks ended June 17, 2006, the Company
did not issue stock options.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for
estimating the fair value of its stock options. The
Black-Scholes option-pricing model was developed for use in
estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting
restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition,
option-pricing models require the input of highly subjective
assumptions, including the expected price volatility and option
life. The expected option life is based on the
Predecessors historical experience as well as the vesting
periods and terms of the stock options. The Company uses
expected volatility rates, which are based on a combination of
the Companys historical volatility rates, plus the
historical volatility rates of other companies in the death care
industry, trended into future years. Changes in the subjective
input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate,
and therefore the existing models do not necessarily provide a
reliable single measure of the fair value of the Companys
stock options.
Certain comparative amounts have been reclassified to conform to
the presentation adopted in the current year.
F-111
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
Long-term debt consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 17, 2006 | |
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Revolving credit facility(a)
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
Senior secured term loan B due in 2009(a)(b)
|
|
|
151,683 |
|
|
|
161,683 |
|
7.75% Senior unsecured notes due in 2012(c)
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
Promissory notes and capitalized obligations, certain of which
are secured by assets of certain subsidiaries
|
|
|
6,546 |
|
|
|
7,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358,229 |
|
|
|
373,475 |
|
Less, current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
2,271 |
|
|
|
2,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
355,958 |
|
|
$ |
371,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
In 2003, the Company entered into a senior secured facility (the
Credit Agreement), which after subsequent
amendments, includes a $368,000,000 Senior Secured Term
Loan B due September 29, 2009 (the Term
Loan B) and a $75,000,000 revolving credit facility
(the Revolving Credit Facility), of which
$35,000,000 is available in the form of letters of credit. |
|
|
|
The Revolving Credit Facility is intended to be used primarily
to fund the Companys working capital requirements. The
Revolving Credit Facility bears interest at a rate per annum in
accordance with graduated pricing based upon the Companys
consolidated leverage ratio, and the Company has the option to
elect an interest rate equal to either (i) a base rate
(8.00% at June 17, 2006), plus 1.75% (based upon the
Companys consolidated leverage ratio at June 17,
2006), or (ii) LIBOR (5.42% for the three-month LIBOR at
June 17, 2006), plus 2.75% (based upon the Companys
consolidated leverage ratio at June 17, 2006). An annual
fee of 0.50% is charged on the unused portion of the Revolving
Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility matures on
September 29, 2008. |
|
|
Material covenants in the Credit Agreement include a requirement
to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio and fixed charge
coverage ratio, a requirement not to exceed a maximum leverage
ratio, an annual maximum on capital expenditures and cemetery
development, and specified maximum amounts for capital lease
obligations, indebtedness, acquisitions, certain investments,
and sales of accounts receivable. Outstanding principal amounts
and interest accrued and unpaid may, at the election of the
requisite lenders, become immediately due and payable and
further commitments by the lenders to make loans may, at the
election of the requisite lenders, be terminated upon the
occurrence of events of default specified in the Credit
Agreement. As of June 17, 2006, the Company was in
compliance with all covenants and was not in breach of any
provision of the Credit Agreement that would cause an event of
default to occur. The Credit Agreement is secured by specified
real property, and substantially all personal property of
Alderwoods Group and specified subsidiaries. |
|
|
As of June 17, 2006, the amount available under the
Revolving Credit Facility was $75,000,000, reduced by
$18,930,000 in outstanding letters of credit. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
The Term Loan B provides the Company with an option to
elect an interest rate equal to either (i) a base rate
(8.00% at June 17, 2006), plus 1.00%, or (ii) LIBOR
(5.42% for the three-month LIBOR at June 17, 2006), plus
2.00%. The weighted average rate of interest was 6.95% at
June 17, 2006. The Term Loan B is repayable in
quarterly principal installments from June 17, 2006, to
June 13, 2009 (subject to reduction for prepayments) of
0.25% of the aggregate principal amount of the Term Loan B
outstanding as of December 3, 2004, with a lump sum payment
of the then-outstanding |
F-112
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
amount on the maturity date. The Company has prepaid the
required quarterly principal installments up to and including
the third quarter of its 2007 fiscal year. |
|
(c) |
|
On August 19, 2004, the Company issued the
7.75% Senior Unsecured Notes, due in 2012 (the
Eight-Year Senior Unsecured Notes). Interest accrues
at an annual rate of 7.75% and is payable semi-annually on March
15 and September 15 or, if such day is not a business day, the
next succeeding business day. At any time prior to
September 15, 2007, the Company may, at its option, redeem
up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the Eight-Year
Senior Unsecured Notes at a redemption price of 107.75% of the
stated principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest and
Liquidated Damages (as defined in the indenture governing the
Eight-Year Senior Unsecured Notes), if any, with net cash
proceeds from specified equity offerings, provided at least 65%
of the aggregate principal amount of the Eight-Year Senior
Unsecured Notes remains outstanding and the redemption occurs
within 90 days of the date of the closing of the specified
equity offering. On or after September 15, 2008, the
Company may, at its option, redeem all or part of the Eight-Year
Senior Unsecured Notes at the redemption prices (expressed as
percentages of the stated principal amount) set forth below,
plus accrued and unpaid interest and Liquidated Damages, if any,
if redeemed during the twelve-month period beginning on
September 15 of the years indicated below: |
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
2008
|
|
|
103.875 |
|
2009
|
|
|
101.938 |
|
2010 and thereafter
|
|
|
100.000 |
|
The Credit Agreement and the Eight-Year Senior Unsecured Notes
are guaranteed by substantially all of Alderwoods Groups
wholly-owned U.S. subsidiaries, other than Alderwoods
Groups insurance subsidiaries and other specified excluded
subsidiaries. Alderwoods Group, the parent company, has no
independent assets or operations, and the guarantees of its
guarantor subsidiaries are full and unconditional, and joint and
several.
In certain change of control situations, Alderwoods Group may be
required to make an offer to purchase the then-outstanding
Eight-Year Senior Unsecured Notes at a price equal to 101% of
their stated principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest
to the applicable repurchase date and Liquidated Damages, if any.
The Credit Agreement and the indenture governing the Eight-Year
Senior Unsecured Notes restrict the Companys ability to
engage in asset sales. The Credit Agreement and the indenture
governing the Eight-Year Senior Unsecured Notes prohibit
dispositions of assets unless the assets disposed of fulfill the
requirements of specified exceptions. The indenture governing
the Eight-Year Senior Unsecured Notes excepts, among other
exceptions, assets with a fair market value less than
$5,000,000. One specified exception contained in the Credit
Agreement is dispositions of any of a group of identified
discontinued assets; another is dispositions of
assets not exceeding $35,000,000 book value in the aggregate
over the life of the Credit Agreement, provided that
(i) the consideration received is at least equal to fair
market value and (ii) not less than 75% of the
consideration is paid in cash or cash equivalents. Within
270 days of the receipt of net proceeds from any such asset
sale, the Company has the ability to apply such net proceeds at
its option (or as otherwise required) to invest in non-current
operating assets (or enter into agreements for such investment
which agreements are consummated within 360 days of such
receipt of asset sale proceeds). Up to $10,000,000 of such net
proceeds in any fiscal year (but not in excess of $40,000,000 in
the aggregate over the term of the Credit Agreement) may be
applied to make capital expenditures. To the extent the Company
receives net proceeds in excess of additional specified
thresholds
F-113
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
and such excess is not applied to invest in non-current
operating assets or make capital expenditures as described in
the two immediately preceding sentences, the Company must make
mandatory repayments under the Credit Agreement and, after all
indebtedness under the Credit Agreement has been repaid, offer
to purchase the Eight-Year Senior Unsecured Notes at a purchase
price equal to 100.00% of the stated principal amount, plus
accrued and unpaid interest and Liquidated Damages, if any.
Covenants in the Credit Agreement and the indenture governing
the Eight-Year Senior Unsecured Notes restrict, and under
specified circumstances prohibit, the payment of dividends by
the Company.
|
|
NOTE 4. |
LEGAL CONTINGENCIES |
Funeral Consumers Alliance, Inc. et al v.
Alderwoods Group, Inc. et al was filed in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of California in
April, 2005. This case has been transferred to the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Case
No. CV3394. To date, six separate class action lawsuits,
including Francis H. Rocha v. Alderwoods Group, Inc.
et al, Marcia Berger v. Alderwoods Group, Inc.
et al, Maria Magsarili and Tony Magsarili v.
Alderwoods Group, Inc. et al, Caren Speizer v.
Alderwoods Group, Inc. et al, and Frank
Moroz v. Alderwoods Group, Inc. et al, have been
consolidated into this case (Funeral Consumer Case).
Two other cases, also transferred to the United States District
Court for the Southern District of Texas, Pioneer Valley
Casket Co. v. Alderwoods Group, Inc. et al
(Pioneer Valley) and Ralph Fancher
et al v. Alderwoods Group, Inc. et al
(Fancher), were consolidated into the Funeral
Consumer Case for purposes of discovery only. On June 13,
2006, the United States District Court for the Southern District
of Texas granted Fanchers Notice of Voluntary Dismissal,
with permission to refile its case at another time. The only two
remaining cases, therefore, are the Funeral Consumer Case and
Pioneer Valley.
The Funeral Consumer Case is a purported class action on behalf
of casket consumers throughout the United States. Pioneer
Valley is a purported class action on behalf of independent
casket distributors throughout the United States. Both class
suits name as defendants the Company and four other public
companies involved in the funeral or casket industry. The
Funeral Consumer Case and Pioneer Valley allege that
defendants violated federal and state antitrust laws by engaging
in anticompetitive practices with respect to the sale and
pricing of caskets. Both cases seek injunctions, unspecified
amounts of monetary damages, and treble damages. Motions to
Dismiss filed by the Company and all other defendants are
pending in the Funeral Consumer Case and Pioneer Valley.
Plaintiffs in these cases have yet to provide any meaningful
information regarding their alleged damages. As a result, the
Company cannot quantify its ultimate liability, if any, for the
payment of damages. The Company believes plaintiffs claims
are without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself in
these actions.
Richard Sanchez et al v. Alderwoods Group, Inc.
et al was filed in February 2005 in the Superior Court
of the State of California, for the County of Los Angeles,
Central District; Case No.BC328962. Plaintiffs seek to certify a
nationwide class on behalf of all consumers who purchased
funeral goods and services from the Company. Plaintiffs allege
in essence that the Federal Trade Commissions Funeral Rule
requires the Company to disclose its markups on all items
obtained from third-parties in connection with funeral service
contracts. Plaintiffs allege further that the Company has
failed to make such disclosures. Plaintiffs seek to recover an
unspecified amount of monetary damages, attorneys fees,
costs and unspecified injunctive and declaratory
relief. The Company believes that plaintiffs claims
are without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself in
this action.
On July 7, 2005, the Federal Trade Commission (the
FTC) issued a letter advisory opinion regarding the
lawful construction of the term cash advance item as
used in the Funeral Rule. The FTC
F-114
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
opined with regard to a similar lawsuit in Texas state court:
The Commission believes that the court is incorrect in
ruling that all goods or services purchased from a third-party
vendor are cash advance items. This interpretation sweeps far
too broadly, potentially bringing within its scope every
component good or service that comprises a funeral. This was not
and is not the Commissions intention in the cash
advance provisions of the Rule. In our opinion, the term
cash advance item in the Rule applies only to those
items that the funeral provider represents expressly to be
cash advance items or represents by implication to
be procured on behalf of a particular customer and provided to
that customer at the same price the funeral provider paid for
them. The FTC sets forth its analysis in the remainder of
the letter.
The Company has learned that a number of plaintiffs to these
actions along with the Funeral Consumers Alliance have filed a
petition against the FTC in the District of Columbia Circuit
Court asking the Court to overturn the FTCs July 7,
2005 Advisory Opinion.
In addition to the funeral and casket antitrust lawsuits, the
Company has received a Civil Investigative Demand, dated
August 4, 2005, from the Attorney General of Maryland on
behalf of itself and other undisclosed state attorneys general,
who have commenced an investigation of alleged anticompetitive
practices in the funeral industry. The Company has received
similar Civil Investigative Demands from the Attorneys General
of Florida and Connecticut.
The ultimate outcome of the litigation matters described above
cannot be determined at this time. An adverse decision in one or
more of such matters could have a material adverse effect on the
Company, its financial condition, results of operation and cash
flows. However, the Company intends to aggressively defend the
lawsuits.
In addition, the Company is party to other legal proceedings in
the ordinary course of business, and believes it has made
adequate provision for estimated potential liabilities. The
Company does not expect the outcome of these proceedings,
individually or in the aggregate, to have a material adverse
effect on its financial position, results of operations or
liquidity.
|
|
NOTE 5. |
SUPPLEMENTARY STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS DISCLOSURE |
Supplemental disclosures related to the statement of cash flows
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Weeks Ended | |
|
24 Weeks Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
June 17, | |
|
June 18, | |
|
June 17, | |
|
June 18, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Decrease (increase) in assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net of allowances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
|
|
$ |
863 |
|
|
$ |
4,352 |
|
|
$ |
4,575 |
|
|
$ |
11,483 |
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(5,620 |
) |
|
|
(14,991 |
) |
|
|
(2,495 |
) |
|
|
(14,385 |
) |
|
Inventories
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(199 |
) |
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
(254 |
) |
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
(1,287 |
) |
|
|
17,149 |
|
|
Cemetery property
|
|
|
(2,010 |
) |
|
|
(3,139 |
) |
|
|
(3,434 |
) |
|
|
(4,076 |
) |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(1,532 |
) |
|
|
(1,460 |
) |
|
|
(2,293 |
) |
|
|
(3,547 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
6,295 |
|
|
|
906 |
|
|
|
(3,856 |
) |
|
|
(10,501 |
) |
|
Net effect of pre-need receivables and deferred revenue
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
(1,590 |
) |
|
|
3,288 |
|
|
|
2,933 |
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
2,294 |
|
|
|
3,634 |
|
|
|
5,253 |
|
|
|
(2,892 |
) |
|
Insurance policy liabilities
|
|
|
(819 |
) |
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
(1,028 |
) |
|
|
767 |
|
F-115
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Weeks Ended | |
|
24 Weeks Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
June 17, | |
|
June 18, | |
|
June 17, | |
|
June 18, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Other changes in non-cash balances
|
|
|
(1,656 |
) |
|
|
(2,136 |
) |
|
|
(5,210 |
) |
|
|
(3,529 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,942 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,824 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,130 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,852 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$ |
2,464 |
|
|
$ |
3,008 |
|
|
$ |
12,500 |
|
|
$ |
14,864 |
|
|
Income taxes paid, net of refunds
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
1,741 |
|
|
|
(650 |
) |
|
|
2,132 |
|
|
Bad debt expense
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
1,469 |
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
Stock issued as compensation in lieu of cash
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of funeral, cemetery, and perpetual care trust
investments
|
|
$ |
85,629 |
|
|
$ |
249,159 |
|
|
$ |
162,601 |
|
|
$ |
356,433 |
|
|
|
Proceeds on disposition and maturities of funeral, cemetery, and
perpetual care trust investments
|
|
|
77,872 |
|
|
|
265,648 |
|
|
|
142,336 |
|
|
|
413,116 |
|
|
|
Increase in non-controlling interests in funeral, cemetery and
perpetual care trusts
|
|
|
16,008 |
|
|
|
11,758 |
|
|
|
48,779 |
|
|
|
23,346 |
|
|
|
Decrease in non-controlling interests in funeral, cemetery and
perpetual care trusts upon fulfillment of pre-need contracts
|
|
|
13,258 |
|
|
|
22,397 |
|
|
|
28,583 |
|
|
|
36,411 |
|
|
|
NOTE 6. |
SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
A summary of certain balance sheet accounts is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 17, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Receivables, net of allowances:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer receivables
|
|
$ |
47,313 |
|
|
$ |
50,459 |
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(11,743 |
) |
|
|
(10,320 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
15,674 |
|
|
|
12,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
51,244 |
|
|
$ |
52,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-need funeral receivables and trust investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer receivables
|
|
$ |
38,973 |
|
|
$ |
38,438 |
|
|
Allowance for contract cancellations and refunds
|
|
|
(14,209 |
) |
|
|
(15,988 |
) |
|
Funeral trust investments
|
|
|
303,741 |
|
|
|
282,084 |
|
|
Amounts receivable from funeral trusts
|
|
|
9,547 |
|
|
|
29,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
338,052 |
|
|
$ |
334,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-need cemetery receivables and trust investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer receivables
|
|
$ |
61,819 |
|
|
$ |
61,749 |
|
|
Unearned finance income
|
|
|
(6,259 |
) |
|
|
(6,232 |
) |
|
Allowance for contract cancellations and refunds
|
|
|
(15,492 |
) |
|
|
(15,648 |
) |
|
Cemetery merchandise and service trust investments
|
|
|
261,553 |
|
|
|
267,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
301,621 |
|
|
$ |
307,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery property:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed land and lawn crypts
|
|
$ |
39,240 |
|
|
$ |
38,368 |
|
|
Undeveloped land
|
|
|
30,225 |
|
|
|
31,243 |
|
|
Mausoleums
|
|
|
46,631 |
|
|
|
46,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
116,096 |
|
|
$ |
116,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-116
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 17, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Property and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$ |
163,133 |
|
|
$ |
162,287 |
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
392,125 |
|
|
|
386,068 |
|
|
Automobiles
|
|
|
10,119 |
|
|
|
10,652 |
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
72,397 |
|
|
|
69,570 |
|
|
Computer hardware and software
|
|
|
31,350 |
|
|
|
29,061 |
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(128,170 |
) |
|
|
(114,737 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
540,954 |
|
|
$ |
542,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
$ |
19,930 |
|
|
$ |
18,741 |
|
|
Deferred finance costs
|
|
|
23,291 |
|
|
|
23,359 |
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(16,166 |
) |
|
|
(15,258 |
) |
|
Notes receivable
|
|
|
2,829 |
|
|
|
3,016 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
13,169 |
|
|
|
12,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
43,053 |
|
|
$ |
42,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank overdraft.
|
|
$ |
5,561 |
|
|
$ |
7,191 |
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
15,454 |
|
|
|
13,634 |
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
|
5,169 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
13,881 |
|
|
|
21,629 |
|
|
Accrued insurance
|
|
|
19,965 |
|
|
|
21,261 |
|
|
Accrued taxes
|
|
|
39,974 |
|
|
|
32,199 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
14,001 |
|
|
|
18,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
113,984 |
|
|
$ |
119,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred pre-need contract revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
$ |
44,517 |
|
|
$ |
72,087 |
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
31,313 |
|
|
|
19,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
75,830 |
|
|
$ |
91,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perpetual care liability
|
|
$ |
7,958 |
|
|
$ |
7,860 |
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
15,209 |
|
|
|
9,929 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5,304 |
|
|
|
4,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
28,471 |
|
|
$ |
21,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 7. |
SEGMENT REPORTING |
The Companys reportable segments are comprised of the
three businesses it operates, each of which offers different
products and services: funeral homes, cemeteries and insurance.
There has been no change in the basis of this segmentation,
accounting policies of the segments or the basis of measurement
of segment profit or loss from that disclosed in the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
52 weeks ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the
SEC.
F-117
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
The Company sells primarily to external customers, though any
inter-segment sales or transfers occur at market price. The
Company evaluates performance based on income from operations of
the respective businesses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral | |
|
Cemetery | |
|
Insurance | |
|
Other | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
For the 12 Weeks Ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue earned from external sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 17, 2006
|
|
$ |
107,522 |
|
|
$ |
41,505 |
|
|
$ |
23,417 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
172,444 |
|
|
June 18, 2005
|
|
$ |
110,501 |
|
|
$ |
43,914 |
|
|
$ |
22,363 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
176,778 |
|
Income from operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 17, 2006
|
|
$ |
20,101 |
|
|
$ |
6,224 |
|
|
$ |
1,135 |
|
|
$ |
(18,042 |
) |
|
$ |
9,418 |
|
|
June 18, 2005
|
|
$ |
20,493 |
|
|
$ |
7,275 |
|
|
$ |
830 |
|
|
$ |
(1,702 |
) |
|
$ |
26,896 |
|
Depreciation and amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 17, 2006
|
|
$ |
5,971 |
|
|
$ |
3,038 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
723 |
|
|
$ |
9,756 |
|
|
June 18, 2005
|
|
$ |
5,724 |
|
|
$ |
3,970 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
1,238 |
|
|
$ |
10,958 |
|
Purchase of property and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 17, 2006
|
|
$ |
2,016 |
|
|
$ |
1,940 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
725 |
|
|
$ |
4,718 |
|
|
June 18, 2005
|
|
$ |
5,411 |
|
|
$ |
916 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
5,371 |
|
|
$ |
11,709 |
|
Development of cemetery property:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 17, 2006
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,714 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,714 |
|
|
June 18, 2005
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,040 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,040 |
|
For the 24 Weeks Ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue earned from external sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 17, 2006
|
|
$ |
228,653 |
|
|
$ |
79,336 |
|
|
$ |
46,272 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
354,261 |
|
|
June 18, 2005
|
|
$ |
234,514 |
|
|
$ |
82,218 |
|
|
$ |
43,931 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
360,663 |
|
Income from operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 17, 2006
|
|
$ |
45,870 |
|
|
$ |
10,898 |
|
|
$ |
2,083 |
|
|
$ |
(32,557 |
) |
|
$ |
26,294 |
|
|
June 18, 2005
|
|
$ |
50,254 |
|
|
$ |
13,752 |
|
|
$ |
2,113 |
|
|
$ |
(12,346 |
) |
|
$ |
53,773 |
|
Depreciation and amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 17, 2006
|
|
$ |
11,701 |
|
|
$ |
5,953 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
1,561 |
|
|
$ |
19,266 |
|
|
June 18, 2005
|
|
$ |
11,436 |
|
|
$ |
7,255 |
|
|
$ |
66 |
|
|
$ |
2,338 |
|
|
$ |
21,095 |
|
Purchase of property and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 17, 2006
|
|
$ |
3,549 |
|
|
$ |
4,035 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
1,849 |
|
|
$ |
9,473 |
|
|
June 18, 2005
|
|
$ |
7,320 |
|
|
$ |
1,941 |
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
$ |
6,978 |
|
|
$ |
16,314 |
|
Development of cemetery property:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 17, 2006
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,035 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,035 |
|
|
June 18, 2005
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,672 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 17, 2006
|
|
$ |
1,095,436 |
|
|
$ |
813,313 |
|
|
$ |
336,655 |
|
|
$ |
35,385 |
|
|
$ |
2,280,789 |
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
1,107,916 |
|
|
$ |
807,673 |
|
|
$ |
326,160 |
|
|
$ |
32,554 |
|
|
$ |
2,274,303 |
|
Goodwill at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 17, 2006
|
|
$ |
295,913 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
295,913 |
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
295,890 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
295,890 |
|
F-118
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
The following table reconciles earnings from operations of
reportable segments to total income and identifies the
components of Other segment earnings from operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Weeks Ended | |
|
24 Weeks Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
June 17, | |
|
June 18, | |
|
June 17, | |
|
June 18, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Earnings from operations of funeral, cemetery and insurance
segments
|
|
$ |
27,460 |
|
|
$ |
28,598 |
|
|
$ |
58,851 |
|
|
$ |
66,119 |
|
Other expenses of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(18,042 |
) |
|
|
(1,702 |
) |
|
|
(32,557 |
) |
|
|
(12,346 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
$ |
9,418 |
|
|
$ |
26,896 |
|
|
$ |
26,294 |
|
|
$ |
53,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-119
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
|
|
NOTE 8. |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING GUARANTOR FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
The following presents the condensed consolidating guarantor
financial information as of June 17, 2006 and
December 31, 2005 and for the 12 and 24 weeks ended
June 17, 2006 and June 18, 2005 for the direct and
indirect domestic subsidiaries of the Company that serve as
guarantors of the 7.75% Senior Unsecured Notes due in 2012,
and the Companys subsidiaries that do not serve as
guarantors. Non-guarantor subsidiaries include the Canadian and
Puerto Rican subsidiaries, insurance subsidiaries and certain
domestic subsidiaries that are prohibited by law from
guaranteeing the 7.75% Senior Unsecured Notes due in 2012.
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 17, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Parent | |
|
|
|
Consolidating | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Company | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Non-Guarantors | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,892 |
|
|
$ |
3,508 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,400 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,413 |
|
|
|
12,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,851 |
|
|
Pre-need funeral receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266,435 |
|
|
|
306,753 |
|
|
|
(235,136 |
) |
|
|
338,052 |
|
|
Pre-need cemetery receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282,898 |
|
|
|
267,613 |
|
|
|
(248,890 |
) |
|
|
301,621 |
|
|
Cemetery property and property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
544,851 |
|
|
|
112,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
657,050 |
|
|
Insurance invested assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298,392 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,380 |
|
|
|
55,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295,913 |
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
|
1,097,120 |
|
|
|
(92,380 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,004,740 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,247 |
) |
|
|
245,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,980 |
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
7,125 |
|
|
|
17,222 |
|
|
|
38,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
1,104,245 |
|
|
$ |
1,325,464 |
|
|
$ |
1,339,846 |
|
|
$ |
(1,488,766 |
) |
|
$ |
2,280,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$ |
42,563 |
|
|
$ |
71,618 |
|
|
$ |
(197 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
113,984 |
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,248 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,271 |
|
|
|
Intercompany, net of investments in and advances to affiliates
|
|
|
111,797 |
|
|
|
(298,720 |
) |
|
|
186,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
351,683 |
|
|
|
4,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355,958 |
|
|
|
Deferred pre-need funeral and cemetery contract revenue and
non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
536,221 |
|
|
|
588,083 |
|
|
|
(484,027 |
) |
|
|
640,277 |
|
|
|
Insurance policy liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285,701 |
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
22,111 |
|
|
|
17,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,215 |
|
|
Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,247 |
) |
|
|
246,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,221 |
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
598,183 |
|
|
|
988,958 |
|
|
|
15,760 |
|
|
|
(1,004,739 |
) |
|
|
598,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
1,104,245 |
|
|
$ |
1,325,464 |
|
|
$ |
1,339,846 |
|
|
$ |
(1,488,766 |
) |
|
$ |
2,280,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-120
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Parent | |
|
|
|
Consolidating | |
|
|
|
|
Company | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Non-Guarantors | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Consolidated Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS |
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,034 |
|
|
$ |
3,421 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,455 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
1,964 |
|
|
|
60,070 |
|
|
|
13,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,531 |
|
|
Pre-need funeral receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,915 |
|
|
|
285,617 |
|
|
|
(212,105 |
) |
|
|
334,427 |
|
|
Pre-need cemetery receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287,522 |
|
|
|
273,732 |
|
|
|
(253,932 |
) |
|
|
307,322 |
|
|
Cemetery property and property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
549,860 |
|
|
|
109,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
659,368 |
|
|
Insurance invested assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,598 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,160 |
|
|
|
48,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295,890 |
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
|
1,075,366 |
|
|
|
(91,898 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(983,468 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
243,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,805 |
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
8,101 |
|
|
|
17,367 |
|
|
|
30,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
1,085,431 |
|
|
$ |
1,335,494 |
|
|
$ |
1,302,883 |
|
|
$ |
(1,449,505 |
) |
|
$ |
2,274,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$ |
39,333 |
|
|
$ |
73,597 |
|
|
$ |
6,804 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
119,734 |
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,412 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,435 |
|
|
|
Intercompany, net of investments in and advances to affiliates
|
|
|
82,643 |
|
|
|
(260,549 |
) |
|
|
177,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
365,683 |
|
|
|
5,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
371,040 |
|
|
|
Deferred pre-need funeral and cemetery contract revenue and
non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
533,061 |
|
|
|
573,091 |
|
|
|
(466,037 |
) |
|
|
640,115 |
|
|
|
Insurance policy liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266,729 |
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
20,040 |
|
|
|
12,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,535 |
|
|
Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,962 |
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
597,753 |
|
|
|
961,576 |
|
|
|
21,892 |
|
|
|
(983,468 |
) |
|
|
597,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
1,085,431 |
|
|
$ |
1,335,494 |
|
|
$ |
1,302,883 |
|
|
$ |
(1,449,505 |
) |
|
$ |
2,274,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-121
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Weeks Ended June 17, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Parent | |
|
|
|
Consolidating | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Company | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Non-Guarantors | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
127,285 |
|
|
$ |
45,159 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
172,444 |
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,192 |
|
|
|
40,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,984 |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,055 |
|
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
|
14,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(2,055 |
) |
|
|
21,859 |
|
|
|
(10,386 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,418 |
|
Interest on long-term debt
|
|
|
6,533 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,471 |
|
Intercompany charges
|
|
|
3,633 |
|
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
|
(7,833 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense (income), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(12,221 |
) |
|
|
17,471 |
|
|
|
(2,588 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,662 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
|
2,804 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(11,898 |
) |
|
|
14,667 |
|
|
|
(2,616 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in subsidiaries
|
|
|
10,809 |
|
|
|
(740 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,069 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle
|
|
|
(1,089 |
) |
|
|
13,927 |
|
|
|
(2,616 |
) |
|
|
(10,069 |
) |
|
|
153 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(1,089 |
) |
|
$ |
13,927 |
|
|
$ |
(2,616 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,069 |
) |
|
$ |
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Weeks Ended June 18, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Parent | |
|
|
|
Consolidating | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Company | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Non-Guarantors | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
134,168 |
|
|
$ |
42,610 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
176,778 |
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,596 |
|
|
|
38,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,588 |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
(12,990 |
) |
|
|
14,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,702 |
|
Provision for asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(408 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(408 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
37,970 |
|
|
|
(11,255 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,896 |
|
Interest on long-term debt
|
|
|
6,798 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
7,013 |
|
Intercompany charges
|
|
|
2,938 |
|
|
|
4,273 |
|
|
|
(7,211 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense (income), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(9,555 |
) |
|
|
33,678 |
|
|
|
(4,175 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
19,927 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(839 |
) |
|
|
7,644 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(8,716 |
) |
|
|
26,034 |
|
|
|
(4,371 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
12,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in subsidiaries
|
|
|
20,799 |
|
|
|
(890 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,909 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(703 |
) |
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(845 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle
|
|
|
12,083 |
|
|
|
24,441 |
|
|
|
(4,534 |
) |
|
|
(19,909 |
) |
|
|
12,081 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
12,083 |
|
|
$ |
24,441 |
|
|
$ |
(4,534 |
) |
|
$ |
(19,909 |
) |
|
$ |
12,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-122
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 Weeks Ended June 17, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Parent | |
|
|
|
Consolidating | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Company | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Non-Guarantors | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
263,998 |
|
|
$ |
90,263 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
354,261 |
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214,911 |
|
|
|
80,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295,410 |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,637 |
|
|
|
2,273 |
|
|
|
27,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(2,637 |
) |
|
|
46,814 |
|
|
|
(17,883 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,294 |
|
Interest on long-term debt
|
|
|
12,957 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,949 |
|
Intercompany charges
|
|
|
8,279 |
|
|
|
12,953 |
|
|
|
(21,232 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense (income), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(23,873 |
) |
|
|
33,833 |
|
|
|
3,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,216 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
5,264 |
|
|
|
2,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(23,866 |
) |
|
|
28,569 |
|
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,898 |
|
Equity in subsidiaries
|
|
|
28,506 |
|
|
|
(718 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,788 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
4,640 |
|
|
|
27,851 |
|
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
(27,788 |
) |
|
|
5,898 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
4,640 |
|
|
$ |
27,851 |
|
|
$ |
(47 |
) |
|
$ |
(27,788 |
) |
|
$ |
4,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 Weeks Ended June 18, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Parent | |
|
|
|
Consolidating | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Company | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Non-Guarantors | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
274,526 |
|
|
$ |
86,137 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
360,663 |
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
219,541 |
|
|
|
76,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296,171 |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
(14,124 |
) |
|
|
26,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,346 |
|
Provision for asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,606 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,627 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
70,715 |
|
|
|
(17,204 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,773 |
|
Interest on long-term debt
|
|
|
14,108 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,528 |
|
Intercompany charges
|
|
|
5,147 |
|
|
|
10,756 |
|
|
|
(15,903 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense (income), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,124 |
) |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,843 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(18,993 |
) |
|
|
65,681 |
|
|
|
(1,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,088 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(663 |
) |
|
|
17,519 |
|
|
|
1,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(18,330 |
) |
|
|
48,162 |
|
|
|
(2,937 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in subsidiaries
|
|
|
43,548 |
|
|
|
(812 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,736 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,248 |
) |
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle
|
|
|
25,218 |
|
|
|
46,102 |
|
|
|
(3,367 |
) |
|
|
(42,736 |
) |
|
|
25,217 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
25,218 |
|
|
$ |
46,102 |
|
|
$ |
(3,367 |
) |
|
$ |
(42,736 |
) |
|
$ |
25,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-123
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Weeks Ended June 17, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Parent | |
|
|
|
Consolidating |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Company | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Non-Guarantors | |
|
Adjustments |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
CASH PROVIDED BY (APPLIED TO)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations
|
|
$ |
4,306 |
|
|
$ |
2,725 |
|
|
$ |
12,839 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,870 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,359 |
) |
|
|
(12,456 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,815 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
(4,274 |
) |
|
|
(521 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,795 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
5,047 |
|
|
|
3,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,892 |
|
|
$ |
3,508 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Weeks Ended June 18, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Parent | |
|
|
|
Consolidating | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Company | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Non-Guarantors | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
CASH PROVIDED BY (APPLIED TO)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations
|
|
$ |
18,893 |
|
|
$ |
(11,246 |
) |
|
$ |
21,090 |
|
|
$ |
(21 |
) |
|
$ |
28,716 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
(1,226 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(811 |
) |
Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,657 |
) |
|
|
(13,840 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,497 |
) |
Cash flows from investing activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,033 |
|
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,744 |
|
Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
(18,893 |
) |
|
|
(633 |
) |
|
|
(1,503 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,029 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,120 |
) |
|
|
5,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,888 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,848 |
|
|
|
(1,970 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,728 |
|
|
$ |
3,262 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 Weeks Ended June 17, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Parent | |
|
|
|
Consolidating |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Company | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Non-Guarantors | |
|
Adjustments |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
CASH PROVIDED BY (APPLIED TO)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations
|
|
$ |
13,234 |
|
|
$ |
5,751 |
|
|
$ |
21,339 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
40,324 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,679 |
) |
|
|
(21,246 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,925 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
(13,202 |
) |
|
|
(1,248 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,454 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
824 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
945 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
4,068 |
|
|
|
3,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,892 |
|
|
$ |
3,508 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-124
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 Weeks Ended June 18, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Parent | |
|
|
|
Consolidating |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Company | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Non-Guarantors | |
|
Adjustments |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
CASH PROVIDED BY (APPLIED TO)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations
|
|
$ |
49,534 |
|
|
$ |
(5,790 |
) |
|
$ |
27,197 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
70,941 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
1,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(601 |
) |
Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,870 |
|
|
|
(25,766 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,896 |
) |
Cash flows from investing activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,127 |
|
|
|
1,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,906 |
|
Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
(49,534 |
) |
|
|
(1,516 |
) |
|
|
(1,632 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,682 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,343 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,611 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,385 |
|
|
|
2,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,728 |
|
|
$ |
3,262 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 9. |
PROVISION FOR ASSET IMPAIRMENT |
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets (SFAS No. 144),
the Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment when
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
the asset may not be recoverable. SFAS No. 144
requires that long-lived assets to be held and used be recorded
at the lower of carrying amount or fair value. Long-lived assets
to be disposed of are to be recorded at the lower of carrying
amount or fair value, less estimated costs to sell.
As part of the Companys ongoing assessment to ensure that
each of the Companys properties fit into the
Companys strategy, as at June 17, 2006 the Company
had available for sale one funeral home and one cemetery
property business. These properties remain unsold as of
June 17, 2006. The carrying amount of these locations was
$527,000 which was less than estimated aggregate fair market
value. The fair market values were determined by specific offers
or bids, or estimates based on comparable recent sales
transactions. For the 24 weeks ended June 17, 2006,
these properties had revenues and costs of $304,000 and $269,000
(June 18, 2005 $321,000 and $295,000),
respectively.
The assets of $3,224,000 (December 31, 2005
$3,285,000) and liabilities of $2,697,000 (December 31,
2005 $2,731,000) of these locations have not been
reclassified to assets held for sale and liabilities associated
with assets held for sale in the balance sheet.
In addition, for the 24 weeks ended June 17, 2006, the
Company disposed of 7 funeral home businesses which were not
reclassified to discontinued operations. Revenues and costs of
these disposed of locations were $312,000 and $414,000
(June 18, 2005 $894,000 and $884,000) for the
24 weeks ended June 17, 2006, respectively.
In addition to those funeral home and cemetery businesses held
for sale or disposed of as identified above, the Company closed
8 funeral home locations during the 24 weeks ended
June 17, 2006. The
F-125
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
criteria for identifying a location to be closed includes among
other items, synergies from transferring the ongoing business to
an adjacent location and the valuation of the real estate assets
compared to sale as a business.
The asset impairment provisions include management estimates. As
a result, actual results could differ significantly from these
estimates.
|
|
NOTE 10. |
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS OF ASSETS HELD FOR SALE |
Over the previous four fiscal years, the Company engaged in a
strategic market rationalization assessment to dispose of
cemetery and funeral operating locations that did not fit into
the Companys market or business strategies, as well as
under-performing locations and excess cemetery land. The Company
will on a smaller scale and over time, continue to assess the
Companys portfolio of funeral and cemetery locations to
ensure they continue to fit in the Companys strategy.
As of January 1, 2005, the Company had 18 funeral, six
cemetery and four combination locations which had not been sold
within one year of being added to the disposal list. The Company
completed the sale of all these locations during 2005, except
for one cemetery which was reclassified back to continuing
operations.
The revenues and costs and impairment provisions for the
locations identified as discontinued operations are presented in
the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Weeks | |
|
24 Weeks | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
June 18, | |
|
June 18, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
$ |
394 |
|
|
$ |
1,853 |
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
538 |
|
|
$ |
2,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
$ |
(170 |
) |
|
$ |
(152 |
) |
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
(389 |
) |
Provision for asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
(957 |
) |
Interest on long-term debt
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other expense (income), net
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, before tax
|
|
|
(579 |
) |
|
|
(1,412 |
) |
Income tax provision for discontinued operations
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
$ |
(845 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation included in gross margin of discontinued operations
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-126
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
|
|
NOTE 11. |
INCOME PER SHARE |
The basic and diluted income per share computations for net
income were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Weeks Ended | |
|
24 Weeks Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
June 17, | |
|
June 18, | |
|
June 17, | |
|
June 18, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Income (numerator):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stockholders
|
|
$ |
153 |
|
|
$ |
12,081 |
|
|
$ |
4,656 |
|
|
$ |
25,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (denominator):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of shares of Common stock
outstanding (thousands)
|
|
|
40,652 |
|
|
|
40,108 |
|
|
|
40,559 |
|
|
|
40,078 |
|
|
Effect of stock options assumed exercised (thousands)
|
|
|
2,025 |
|
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
|
1,863 |
|
|
|
1,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of shares of Common stock
outstanding (thousands)
|
|
|
42,677 |
|
|
|
41,390 |
|
|
|
42,422 |
|
|
|
41,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the 12 and 24 weeks ended June 17, 2006, 4,804,750
employee and director stock options were dilutive to earnings
and are included in the computation of diluted earnings per
share. Warrants to purchase 2,992,000 shares of Common
stock were not included in the computation of diluted earnings
per share, because they were anti-dilutive.
|
|
NOTE 12. |
EFFECT OF HURRICANE KATRINA |
The Company operated 30 funeral homes, four cemeteries and a
limousine company in those areas of Louisiana and Mississippi
that were affected by the hurricane on August 29, 2005. The
Company has experienced some damage at all of these locations.
Of the 30 funeral homes, seven experienced significant damage,
were not in operation at the end of the 2005 fiscal year and are
not expected to reopen. All four cemeteries are in operation.
The New Orleans limousine company that had provided services
both to the Companys funeral operations and other
third-parties experienced significant damage to its fleet of
vehicles and will not be resuming operations.
The Company is making every effort to use its existing operating
facilities to provide services to customers normally served by
the Companys closed locations.
F-127
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
The Companys financial results include the results from
operations for those locations affected by Hurricane Katrina as
outlined in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Weeks Ended | |
|
24 Weeks Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
June 17, | |
|
June 18, | |
|
June 17, | |
|
June 18, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Funeral Homes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$ |
5,604 |
|
|
$ |
6,659 |
|
|
$ |
12,461 |
|
|
$ |
14,355 |
|
|
|
Number of funeral services performed
|
|
|
1,227 |
|
|
|
1,409 |
|
|
|
2,690 |
|
|
|
3,079 |
|
|
|
Number of same-site funeral services performed
|
|
|
1,225 |
|
|
|
1,173 |
|
|
|
2,688 |
|
|
|
2,574 |
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
$ |
3,403 |
|
|
$ |
5,157 |
|
|
$ |
8,912 |
|
|
$ |
11,402 |
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
$ |
2,201 |
|
|
$ |
1,502 |
|
|
$ |
3,549 |
|
|
$ |
2,953 |
|
|
Pre-need funeral contracts written
|
|
$ |
1,546 |
|
|
$ |
2,954 |
|
|
$ |
2,837 |
|
|
$ |
5,782 |
|
Cemeteries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$ |
788 |
|
|
$ |
681 |
|
|
$ |
1,472 |
|
|
$ |
1,424 |
|
|
|
Number of cemetery interments
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
$ |
704 |
|
|
$ |
666 |
|
|
$ |
1,262 |
|
|
$ |
1,328 |
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
210 |
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
Pre-need cemetery contracts written
|
|
$ |
347 |
|
|
$ |
346 |
|
|
$ |
574 |
|
|
$ |
690 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance coverage and long-term asset gain or loss |
The Company purchases insurance coverage for property damage,
including damage from wind and flood, subject to separate
limits, sub-limits and deductible amounts. The Company, along
with its insurance providers, is continuing to assess and
estimate the extent of damages. Based on a review of the
Companys insurance policy, the Company expects to recover
a substantial portion of the costs associated with the storm
damage through insurance, including the capital costs of
rebuilding. For those properties not in operation and requiring
significant repair or rebuilding, the Company has considered the
properties destroyed or abandoned and based on estimated
insurance proceeds of $12,550,000, has realized a gain of
$1,000,000 in the 12 weeks ended June 17, 2006 on the
writeoff of the applicable buildings and contents.
The Company has initiated or completed much of the damage
repairs and along with its insurance companies, is continuing to
estimate the full extent of repairs and replacement costs. The
Company may record additional expense for changes to its
expected deductible under its insurance policies and other
expenses not expected to be reimbursed under the insurance
policy. During the 12 weeks ended June 17, 2006, the
Company reduced its expected costs by $200,000.
The Company has business interruption insurance that allows the
recovery of operating costs and lost profits. The Company is
preparing its analysis in support of a claim. Potential proceeds
from this claim cannot currently be reasonably estimated and
therefore no receivable or recovery has been recorded as of
June 17, 2006.
|
|
NOTE 13. |
PROPOSED MERGER AGREEMENT |
On April 3, 2006, Service Corporation International
(SCI) and the Company announced that they have
entered into a merger agreement. Pursuant to the agreement, each
share of the Company will be
F-128
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
converted into the right to receive $20.00 per share in
cash. In addition, SCI will assume approximately
$358 million of the Companys debt. The Companys
stockholders voted on May 31, 2006 to approve this
agreement.
Completion of the proposed transaction is contingent on
regulatory review, including Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 and the Competition Act
(Canada), and subject to notification under the Investment
Canada Act.
As previously disclosed, subsequent to the stockholders vote the
Company together with SCI entered into a timing agreement with
the staff of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in
connection with the proposed merger of the Company with a
subsidiary of SCI. As also previously disclosed, each of the
Company and SCI have received Second Requests from
the FTC, and as a result thereof, the waiting period under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976,
during which the parties may not consummate the proposed merger,
has been extended. The parties are working toward responding to
the Second Requests.
As a result of the timing agreement, Alderwoods and SCI expect
to seek to negotiate a consent decree with the FTC, in which
case the proposed merger could close as early as on or before
September 30, 2006. Alderwoods and SCI have agreed with the
FTC that if the parties are unable to reach agreement on a
consent agreement with the FTC, they will not close the proposed
merger before October 30, 2006. In addition, Alderwoods and
SCI have agreed, under a standard provision of a recently
adopted FTC protocol for administering Second Requests that if
the FTC challenges the proposed transaction by filing an
application for preliminary injunction in federal court,
Alderwoods and SCI, jointly with the FTC, will propose a
scheduling order that provides for a
60-day pre-hearing
discovery period.
The Company and SCI continue to expect that the transaction will
close by the end of 2006.
F-129
MANAGEMENTS REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL
REPORTING
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting
for the Company as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. The
Companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed under the supervision of the Companys CEO
and CFO, and effected by the Companys Board of Directors,
management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of the financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree
of compliance with policies and procedures may deteriorate.
Management has assessed the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2005. In making this assessment, management
used the criteria described in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Based on Managements assessment under the framework in
Internal Control Integrated Framework, management
has concluded that internal control over financial reporting was
effective as of December 31, 2005.
The Companys independent registered public accounting
firm, KPMG LLP, has audited Managements assessment of the
effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting and
the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting,
as stated in their report which is included herein.
F-130
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Alderwoods Group, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Alderwoods Group, Inc. as at December 31, 2005 and
January 1, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows for the
fifty-two weeks ended December 31, 2005, the fifty-two
weeks ended January 1, 2005 and the fifty-three weeks ended
January 3, 2004. In connection with our audits of the
consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the
information with respect to the Company in financial statement
Schedule II included in Item 15 of the Companys
annual report on
Form 10-K. These
consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Alderwoods Group, Inc. as at December 31, 2005
and January 1, 2005, and the results of its operations and
its cash flows for the fifty-two weeks ended December 31,
2005, the fifty-two weeks ended January 1, 2005 and the
fifty-three weeks ended January 3, 2004, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our
opinion, the related financial statement schedules when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of Alderwoods Group, Inc.s internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated
March 10, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion on
managements assessment of, and the effective operation of,
internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
|
/s/ KPMG LLP |
|
Chartered Accountants |
|
Vancouver, Canada |
March 10, 2006
F-131
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Alderwoods Group, Inc.
We have audited managements assessment, included in the
accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting, that Alderwoods Group, Inc. maintained
effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). Alderwoods Group, Inc.s management is responsible
for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on managements assessment and an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, evaluating
managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that Alderwoods
Group, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all
material respects, based on criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Also, in our opinion, Alderwoods Group, Inc. maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO).
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Alderwoods Group, Inc. as of
December 31, 2005 and January 1, 2005, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders
equity, and cash flows for the fifty-two weeks ended
December 31, 2005, fifty-two weeks ended January 1,
2005 and fifty-three weeks ended January 3, 2004, and our
report dated March 10, 2006 expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Chartered Accountants
Vancouver, Canada
March 10, 2006
F-132
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Expressed in thousands of dollars
except number of shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS |
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
7,455 |
|
|
$ |
9,379 |
|
|
Receivables, net of allowances
|
|
|
52,862 |
|
|
|
66,445 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
15,784 |
|
|
|
16,730 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6,885 |
|
|
|
27,622 |
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,986 |
|
|
|
202,232 |
|
Pre-need funeral receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
334,427 |
|
|
|
336,030 |
|
Pre-need cemetery receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
307,322 |
|
|
|
311,654 |
|
Cemetery property
|
|
|
116,467 |
|
|
|
119,042 |
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
542,901 |
|
|
|
540,255 |
|
Insurance invested assets
|
|
|
294,598 |
|
|
|
250,785 |
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
13,057 |
|
|
|
8,161 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
295,890 |
|
|
|
321,134 |
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments
|
|
|
243,805 |
|
|
|
246,052 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
42,850 |
|
|
|
37,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,274,303 |
|
|
$ |
2,372,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$ |
119,734 |
|
|
$ |
140,662 |
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
2,435 |
|
|
|
9,083 |
|
|
Liabilities associated with assets held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,169 |
|
|
|
211,173 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
371,040 |
|
|
|
454,557 |
|
Deferred pre-need funeral and cemetery contract revenue
|
|
|
91,618 |
|
|
|
82,971 |
|
Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts
|
|
|
548,497 |
|
|
|
553,617 |
|
Insurance policy liabilities
|
|
|
266,729 |
|
|
|
214,745 |
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
10,552 |
|
|
|
20,357 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
21,983 |
|
|
|
21,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,432,588 |
|
|
|
1,559,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts
|
|
|
243,962 |
|
|
|
257,141 |
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares
authorized, 40,458,864 issued and outstanding (2004
40,017,454)
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
743,126 |
|
|
|
740,210 |
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(172,405 |
) |
|
|
(213,588 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
26,627 |
|
|
|
28,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
597,753 |
|
|
|
555,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,274,303 |
|
|
$ |
2,372,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
F-133
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Expressed in thousands of dollars
except per share amounts and number of shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks | |
|
52 Weeks | |
|
53 Weeks | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
January 3, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
$ |
479,799 |
|
|
$ |
472,935 |
|
|
$ |
491,611 |
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
174,110 |
|
|
|
164,052 |
|
|
|
168,024 |
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
95,005 |
|
|
|
80,124 |
|
|
|
61,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
748,914 |
|
|
|
717,111 |
|
|
|
720,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
392,544 |
|
|
|
376,646 |
|
|
|
378,195 |
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
151,914 |
|
|
|
140,145 |
|
|
|
139,299 |
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
89,937 |
|
|
|
75,415 |
|
|
|
59,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
634,395 |
|
|
|
592,206 |
|
|
|
576,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,519 |
|
|
|
124,905 |
|
|
|
143,893 |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
42,815 |
|
|
|
51,218 |
|
|
|
56,281 |
|
Provision for asset impairment
|
|
|
(1,379 |
) |
|
|
1,787 |
|
|
|
5,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
73,083 |
|
|
|
71,900 |
|
|
|
82,383 |
|
Interest on long-term debt and refinancing costs (Note 6)
|
|
|
30,069 |
|
|
|
78,079 |
|
|
|
76,453 |
|
Other expense (income), net
|
|
|
(4,662 |
) |
|
|
(1,162 |
) |
|
|
4,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
47,676 |
|
|
|
(5,017 |
) |
|
|
1,874 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
4,815 |
|
|
|
(1,453 |
) |
|
|
(6,485 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
42,861 |
|
|
|
(3,564 |
) |
|
|
8,359 |
|
Discontinued operations (Note 19)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(1,412 |
) |
|
|
19,400 |
|
|
|
6,870 |
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
6,487 |
|
|
|
4,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(1,678 |
) |
|
|
12,913 |
|
|
|
2,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
41,183 |
|
|
$ |
9,349 |
|
|
$ |
10,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per Common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per Common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
0.99 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding (thousands)
|
|
|
40,245 |
|
|
|
40,001 |
|
|
|
39,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding (thousands)
|
|
|
41,602 |
|
|
|
41,132 |
|
|
|
40,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
F-134
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Expressed in thousands of dollars
except number of shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common | |
|
Capital in | |
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Par | |
|
Excess of | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Value | |
|
Par Value | |
|
Deficit | |
|
Income | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at December 28, 2002
|
|
|
39,941,271 |
|
|
$ |
399 |
|
|
$ |
739,711 |
|
|
$ |
(233,744 |
) |
|
$ |
17,036 |
|
|
$ |
523,402 |
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,807 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of income taxes of
$nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,187 |
|
|
|
15,187 |
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on insurance invested assets, net of income tax
recovery of $2,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,790 |
) |
|
|
(4,790 |
) |
|
|
|
Less:
reclassification adjustments for realized gain on insurance
invested assets included in net income, net of income taxes of
$345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(642 |
) |
|
|
(642 |
) |
|
|
Unrealized gain on derivatives, net of income taxes of $nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,251 |
|
Common stock issued:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued in connection with the settlement of certain
unsecured claims
|
|
|
21,140 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
Stock issued as compensation in lieu of cash
|
|
|
18,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
Stock issued under equity incentive plan
|
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 3, 2004
|
|
|
39,984,979 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
739,950 |
|
|
|
(222,937 |
) |
|
|
27,480 |
|
|
|
544,893 |
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,349 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of income taxes of
$nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,324 |
|
|
|
5,324 |
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on insurance invested assets, net of income tax
recovery of $2,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,890 |
) |
|
|
(2,890 |
) |
|
|
|
Less:
reclassification adjustments for realized gain on insurance
invested assets included in net income, net of income taxes of
$1,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,254 |
) |
|
|
(2,254 |
) |
|
|
Unrealized gain on derivatives, net of income taxes of $nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,571 |
|
|
|
1,571 |
|
|
|
|
Less:
reclassification adjustments for realized gain on derivatives
included in net income, net of income taxes of $nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(341 |
) |
|
|
(341 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,759 |
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
F-135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common | |
|
Capital in | |
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Par | |
|
Excess of | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Value | |
|
Par Value | |
|
Deficit | |
|
Income | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Common stock issued:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued in connection with the settlement of certain
unsecured claims
|
|
|
5,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
Stock issued as compensation in lieu of cash
|
|
|
16,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
Stock issued under equity incentive plan
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2005
|
|
|
40,017,454 |
|
|
$ |
400 |
|
|
$ |
740,210 |
|
|
$ |
(213,588 |
) |
|
$ |
28,890 |
|
|
$ |
555,912 |
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,183 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of income taxes of
$nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,138 |
|
|
|
3,138 |
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on insurance invested assets, net of income tax
recovery of $2,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,328 |
) |
|
|
(4,328 |
) |
|
|
|
Less:
reclassification adjustments for realized gain on insurance
invested assets included in net income, net of income taxes of $9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
Unrealized loss on derivatives, net of income taxes of $nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(480 |
) |
|
|
(480 |
) |
|
|
|
Less:
reclassification adjustments for realized gain on derivatives
included in net income, net of income taxes of $nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(576 |
) |
|
|
(576 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,920 |
|
Common stock issued:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued as compensation in lieu of cash
|
|
|
10,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
Stock issued under equity incentive plan
|
|
|
431,250 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
40,458,864 |
|
|
$ |
405 |
|
|
$ |
743,126 |
|
|
$ |
(172,405 |
) |
|
$ |
26,627 |
|
|
$ |
597,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
F-136
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Expressed in thousands of dollars
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks | |
|
52 Weeks | |
|
53 Weeks | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
January 3, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
CASH PROVIDED BY (APPLIED TO)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
41,183 |
|
|
$ |
9,349 |
|
|
$ |
10,807 |
|
|
(Income) loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
1,678 |
|
|
|
(12,913 |
) |
|
|
(2,448 |
) |
|
Items not affecting cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
44,598 |
|
|
|
42,093 |
|
|
|
40,222 |
|
|
|
Amortization of debt issue costs
|
|
|
3,186 |
|
|
|
10,118 |
|
|
|
3,220 |
|
|
|
Insurance policy benefit reserves
|
|
|
49,532 |
|
|
|
40,705 |
|
|
|
28,772 |
|
|
|
Provision for asset impairment
|
|
|
(1,379 |
) |
|
|
1,787 |
|
|
|
5,229 |
|
|
|
Loss (gain) on disposal of assets
|
|
|
(4,966 |
) |
|
|
(3,530 |
) |
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
13,860 |
|
|
|
(5,126 |
) |
|
|
(1,950 |
) |
Premium on long-term debt repurchase
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
32,450 |
|
|
|
1,266 |
|
Other, including net changes in other non-cash balances
|
|
|
(540 |
) |
|
|
(10,653 |
) |
|
|
51,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by continuing operations
|
|
|
147,434 |
|
|
|
104,280 |
|
|
|
137,196 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations
|
|
|
(601 |
) |
|
|
15,309 |
|
|
|
18,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,833 |
|
|
|
119,589 |
|
|
|
155,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds on disposition of business assets
|
|
|
20,721 |
|
|
|
20,917 |
|
|
|
11,409 |
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(42,510 |
) |
|
|
(37,183 |
) |
|
|
(25,202 |
) |
|
Purchase of insurance invested assets
|
|
|
(126,811 |
) |
|
|
(138,346 |
) |
|
|
(117,689 |
) |
|
Proceeds on disposition and maturities of insurance invested
assets
|
|
|
79,647 |
|
|
|
86,763 |
|
|
|
78,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in continuing operations
|
|
|
(68,953 |
) |
|
|
(67,849 |
) |
|
|
(53,423 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by discontinued operations
|
|
|
7,908 |
|
|
|
108,975 |
|
|
|
23,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,045 |
) |
|
|
41,126 |
|
|
|
(29,713 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in long-term debt
|
|
|
11,198 |
|
|
|
390,044 |
|
|
|
330,455 |
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
|
|
(101,630 |
) |
|
|
(582,608 |
) |
|
|
(458,868 |
) |
|
Issuance of Common Stock
|
|
|
2,777 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in continuing operations
|
|
|
(87,655 |
) |
|
|
(192,508 |
) |
|
|
(128,385 |
) |
|
Net cash used in discontinued operations
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(440 |
) |
|
|
(2,177 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(87,712 |
) |
|
|
(192,948 |
) |
|
|
(130,562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(1,924 |
) |
|
|
(32,233 |
) |
|
|
(4,500 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
9,379 |
|
|
|
41,612 |
|
|
|
46,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
|
$ |
7,455 |
|
|
$ |
9,379 |
|
|
$ |
41,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
F-137
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
|
|
NOTE 1. |
NATURE OF OPERATIONS |
Alderwoods Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Alderwoods
Group and, together with its subsidiaries unless the
context otherwise requires, the Company) is the
second-largest operator of funeral homes and cemeteries in North
America based on total revenue and number of locations. As of
December 31, 2005, the Company operated 594 funeral homes
and 72 cemeteries and 60 combination funeral homes and
cemeteries throughout North America.
The Companys funeral operations encompass making funeral
and cremation arrangements on an at-need or pre-need basis. The
Companys funeral operations offer a full range of funeral
services, including the collection of remains, registration of
death, professional embalming, use of funeral home facilities,
sale of caskets and other merchandise and transportation to a
place of worship, funeral chapel, cemetery or crematorium.
The Companys cemetery operations assist families in making
burial arrangements and offer a complete line of cemetery
products (including a selection of burial spaces, burial vaults,
lawn crypts, caskets, memorials, niches, mausoleum crypts and
other merchandise), the opening and closing of graves and
cremation services.
The Companys insurance operations sell a variety of
insurance products, primarily to fund pre-need funeral services.
|
|
NOTE 2. |
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
The Companys fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest to
December 31 in each year (whether before or after such
date).
The first and second fiscal quarters each consist of
12 weeks and the third fiscal quarter consists of
16 weeks. In order to cause the fourth fiscal quarter to
end on the same day as the fiscal year, the fourth fiscal
quarter will consist of 13 weeks rather than 12 weeks
in certain years.
The Company is the successor to The Loewen Group Inc. (the
Predecessor) and its subsidiaries, including Loewen
Group International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Loewen
International). On June 1, 1999, the Predecessor
filed a petition for creditor protection under Chapter 11
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Delaware (the Bankruptcy
Court) and voluntarily filed an application for creditor
protection under the Companies Creditors Arrangement Act
(Creditors Arrangement Act) with the Ontario
Superior Court of Justice, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (the
Canadian Court). The Bankruptcy Court confirmed, and
the Canadian Court recognized, the plan of reorganization (the
Plan) in December 2001 and on January 2, 2002
(the Effective Date), the Company emerged from
reorganization proceedings.
At December 31, 2001, the Company adopted fresh start
reporting in accordance with AICPA Statement of
Position 90-7,
Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization under
the Bankruptcy Code. As a result of the application of
fresh start reporting, significant adjustments were made to the
Companys historical assets and liabilities, as the fair
values varied significantly from the amounts recorded by the
Predecessor as of December 31, 2001.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company, its subsidiary companies and operations controlled
by the Company through sales and management agreements. All
subsidiaries are
F-138
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
wholly owned, except for a few companies with small minority
interests. The consolidated financial statements also include
the accounts of the funeral trusts, cemetery merchandise and
service trusts and perpetual care trusts, and several pooled
investment funds created for such trusts in which the Company
has a variable interest and is the primary beneficiary.
All significant inter-entity balances and transactions have been
eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. The
consolidated financial statements have been prepared using the
U.S. dollar and are presented in accordance with United
States generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP).
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in
accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the
reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting
period. As a result, actual amounts could significantly differ
from those estimates.
Sales of at-need funeral services are recorded as revenue when
the service is performed.
Pre-need funeral services contracts provide for future funeral
services, generally determined by prices prevailing at the time
the contract is signed. The payments made under the contract, in
part, are either placed in trust or are used to pay the premiums
of life insurance policies under which the Company is designated
as beneficiary. Pre-need funeral services contract amounts are
deferred until the service is performed. The Company estimates
that trust fund investment earnings and annual insurance
benefits exceed the increase in cost over time of providing the
related services.
The Company records amounts in funeral trusts in which the
Company is not the primary beneficiary as amounts receivable
from funeral trusts. Earnings in these trusts are deferred until
the service is performed. The Company does not record on the
consolidated balance sheet amounts associated with insurance
funded pre-need contracts for which the Company has not serviced
the contract.
The Company records the assets in the funeral trusts in which
the Company is the primary beneficiary as trust investments at
their fair value in accordance with the FASBs Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, Accounting
for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities
(FAS No. 115). The liabilities of these
trusts that are consolidated consist principally of the trusted
portion of the Companys obligation to the pre-need
contract holders, which is reflected as non-controlling interest
in the trusts.
Realized earnings from funeral trust investments and related
expenses of the trusts are recognized in other expense (income).
Typically, an offsetting accretion for the non-controlling
interest in the trusts is included as interest expense in other
expense (income). Unrealized gains and losses of funeral trust
investments are recorded in both trust investments and, net of
tax, in non-controlling interest in funeral trusts in the
Companys consolidated balance sheet.
Selling costs related to the sale of pre-need funeral services
are expensed in the period incurred.
Sales of cemetery merchandise and services and at-need cemetery
interment rights are recorded as revenue when the merchandise is
delivered or service is performed.
F-139
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
Sales of pre-need cemetery interment rights are recognized in
accordance with the retail land sales provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 66, Accounting for
Sales of Real Estate (FAS No. 66)
and EITF No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with
Multiple Deliverables
(EITF 00-21).
Accordingly, provided certain collectibility criteria are met,
pre-need cemetery interment rights sales of developed cemetery
property are deferred until a minimum of 10 percent of the
sales price has been collected, while pre-need cemetery
interment right sales of undeveloped cemetery property are
deferred and revenue is recognized on a percentage of completion
basis as the cemetery property is developed. Multiple element
cemetery contract arrangements are allocated based on objective
evidence of fair value, and revenue is recorded when the
criteria for revenue recognition has been met for each element.
For pre-need sales of cemetery merchandise and services, revenue
is deferred until the delivery of such merchandise or
performance of such services occurs.
Pursuant to various state and provincial laws, a portion of the
proceeds from the sale of pre-need merchandise and services may
also be required to be paid into trusts. The Company records the
assets in the cemetery merchandise and service trusts in which
the Company is the primary beneficiary as trust investments at
their fair value in accordance with FAS No. 115.
The liabilities of the trusts consist principally of the trusted
portion of the Companys obligation to the pre-need
contract holders, which is reflected as non-controlling interest
in the trusts.
Realized earnings from cemetery merchandise and service trust
investments and related expenses of the trusts are recognized in
other expense (income). Typically, an offsetting accretion
expense for the non-controlling interest in the trusts is
included as interest expense in other expense (income). The net
amount of realized earnings on merchandise and service trust
funds are recorded as cemetery revenue when the merchandise is
delivered and service performed. Unrealized gains and losses of
cemetery merchandise and service trust investments are recorded
in both trust investments and, net of tax, in non-controlling
interest in cemetery merchandise and service trusts in the
Companys consolidated balance sheet.
All direct and indirect selling costs associated with the sale
of cemetery products are expensed in the period incurred. The
costs associated with fulfilling pre-need cemetery contracts are
expensed at the same time as the related revenue is recognized.
All costs associated with cemetery interment rights are expensed
at the time of sale, due to the revenues being recognized
pursuant to FAS No. 66. All costs associated with
cemetery merchandise are expensed at the time the pre-need
contract is serviced. All costs associated with cemetery
services are expensed as incurred. These costs are generally not
incurred until the contract is serviced, due to these costs
primarily being labor costs.
Interest is imputed at a market rate for financed pre-need
cemetery contracts that do not bear a market rate of interest.
A portion of the proceeds from cemetery sales for interment
rights is generally required by law to be paid into perpetual or
endowment care trusts. The Company records the assets in the
perpetual care trusts as trust investments at their fair value
in accordance with FAS No. 115.
The principal in perpetual care trusts is required to be held in
perpetuity and is not redeemable by the Company or the customer.
Accordingly, the equity interest in the perpetual care trusts is
presented as a non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts
between liabilities and stockholders equity in the
Companys consolidated balance sheet.
Realized earnings from cemetery perpetual care trust investments
are recognized in other expense (income) in accordance with
FAS No. 115. Typically, an offsetting accretion
expense for the non-
F-140
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
controlling interest in perpetual care trusts is also recorded
in other expense (income). Distributable earnings from the
perpetual care trusts are recognized in cemetery revenue to the
extent of qualifying cemetery maintenance costs. Historically,
qualifying cemetery maintenance costs have exceeded
distributable earnings at individual cemeteries. Unrealized
gains and losses on perpetual care trust investments are
recorded in both cemetery perpetual care trust investments and,
net of tax, in non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts
in the Companys consolidated balance sheet. Generally, net
capital gains of cemetery perpetual care trust investments are
not eligible for distribution to the Company.
Insurance invested assets include fixed-maturity investments,
cash and short-term investments held by the Companys
wholly-owned insurance company. The Company classifies all of
its fixed-maturity investments held by the Companys
insurance company as available-for-sale. Investments classified
as available-for-sale are carried at fair value with unrealized
gains and losses, net of deferred taxes, reflected directly in
accumulated other comprehensive income. Short-term investments
include fixed maturities which mature within one year from the
date of purchase, money market mutual funds and repurchase
agreements.
Insurance invested liabilities include liabilities for future
policy benefits, policy claims and other benefits payable, and
premiums collected in advance. The Company establishes a
liability for future policy benefits related to its traditional
whole life and limited-payment life insurance products using the
net level premium method based on estimated investment yields
and discretionary policy growth rates, mortality, persistency
and other assumptions which were considered appropriate at the
time the policies were issued. Benefit reserves for annuity
contracts represent policy account balances before applicable
surrender charges. Additionally, the Company establishes a
liability for the impact of known policy benefits payable and
estimated claims that have been incurred but not yet reported to
the Company. The estimate of unreported claims is based on prior
experience.
For traditional life and participating life products, premiums
are recognized as revenue when due from policyholders. Benefits
and expenses are matched with earned premiums to result in
recognition of profits over the life of the policy contracts.
This association is accomplished by means of the provision for
liabilities for future policy benefits and the amortization of
deferred policy acquisition costs.
Revenues from annuity contracts represent principally surrender
charges. Expenses from annuity contracts represent principally
accumulated interest. Policy account balances for annuities
represent the deposits received plus accumulated interest.
Investment income, net of investment expenses, and realized
gains and losses related to insurance invested assets are
included within revenues.
Insurance costs and expenses include policy benefits and claims,
changes in policy benefit reserves, amortization of deferred
acquisition costs, commissions, salaries, employee benefits, and
other operating expenses. Policy benefits and expenses are
recognized in income over the life of the policy contracts.
To the extent recoverable, certain costs of acquiring new
insurance business have been deferred. Such costs consist of
first-year commissions in excess of renewal rates, direct
underwriting and issuance costs.
The deferred policy acquisition costs on traditional life
products are amortized with interest over the anticipated
premium-paying period of the related policies, in proportion to
the ratio of annual gross premium revenue to be received over
the life of the policies. Expected premium revenue is estimated
by using the same mortality and withdrawal assumptions used in
computing liabilities for future policy benefits.
F-141
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
Also, the present value of future profits of acquired insurance
business in force is amortized over the expected premium-paying
period of the policies acquired.
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
Cash and cash equivalents include cash and term deposits with a
term to maturity at acquisition of less than or equal to
90 days.
Inventories are carried at the lower of cost, determined
primarily on a specific identification basis or a
first-in first-out
basis, and net realizable value.
Beginning January 4, 2004, the Company accounts for its
variable interest in the approximately 600 funeral, cemetery
merchandise and service, and perpetual care trusts, and several
pooled investment funds created for such trusts, in accordance
with FASB interpretation No. 46 (FIN No. 46R).
The consolidation of the Companys interests did not change
the legal relationships among these trusts, pooled investment
funds, the Company, and its holders of pre-need contracts. The
Company does not consolidate certain funeral trusts for which
the Company does not absorb a majority of their expected losses,
as it is not considered the primary beneficiary of these funeral
trusts under FIN No. 46R.
Under FIN No. 46R, the Company records the assets in
the funeral, cemetery merchandise and service, and perpetual
care trusts, and several pooled investment funds created for
such trusts, in which the Company is the primary beneficiary as
trust investments at their fair value in accordance with
FAS No. 115.
The liabilities of the funeral and cemetery merchandise and
service trusts, and several pooled investment funds consist
principally of the trusted portion of the Companys
obligation to the pre-need contract holders, which is reflected
as non-controlling interest in the trusts. The equity interest
in the perpetual care trusts presented as a non-controlling
interest in perpetual care trusts between liabilities and
stockholders equity in the Companys consolidated
balance sheet as the principal in perpetual care trust is
required to be held in perpetuity and is not redeemable by the
Company or the customer.
Beginning January 4, 2004, realized earnings from funeral
and cemetery merchandise and service trust investments and
related expenses of the trusts are recognized in other expense
(income). In addition, the accretion of the non-controlling
interest in the trusts is included as interest expense in other
expense (income). Unrealized gains and losses of funeral and
cemetery merchandise and service trust investments are recorded
in both trust investments and, net of tax, in non-controlling
interest in funeral and cemetery trust in the Companys
consolidated balance sheet.
Beginning January 4, 2004, realized earnings from cemetery
perpetual care trust investments are recognized in other expense
(income). Accretion expense on the non-controlling interest in
perpetual care trusts is also recorded in other expense
(income). To the extent of qualifying cemetery maintenance
costs, distributable earnings from the perpetual care trust are
recognized in cemetery revenue. Beginning January 4, 2004,
unrealized gains and losses on perpetual care trust investments
are recorded in both cemetery perpetual care trust investments
and, net of tax, in non-controlling interest in perpetual care
trusts in the Companys consolidated balance sheet.
Generally, net capital gains of cemetery perpetual care trust
investments are not eligible for distribution to the Company.
F-142
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
Creditors of the consolidated trusts, if any, have no recourse
to the general credit of the Company, except as provided under
contracts executed by the the Company or its subsidiaries.
Cemetery property, including capitalized interest, consists of
developed plots, lawn crypts, mausoleums or niches and
undeveloped land, and is valued at average cost. Amounts are
expensed as revenue from sales of cemetery property is
recognized.
Property and equipment is recorded at cost and depreciated on a
straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the
assets as follows:
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
10 to 20 years for buildings and the shorter of
10 years or the lease term for leasehold improvements |
Automobiles
|
|
2 to 5 years |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
5 to 10 years |
Computer hardware and software
|
|
3 to 6 years |
|
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets |
Goodwill, resulting from reorganization value in excess of
identifiable net assets and purchase acquisitions, is not
amortized, but tested annually for impairment. The
Companys reporting units for goodwill are its reportable
funeral and cemetery operating segments, and its insurance
reporting unit.
Identifiable intangible assets consist of deferred insurance
policy acquisition costs, present value of future insurance
business profits and acquired key employee covenants not to
compete, which are amortized over their respective useful lives
using a method reflecting the pattern in which such assets are
consumed.
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to
concentrations of credit or collection risk principally consist
of cash and cash equivalents, customer receivables, receivables
from trusts, and trust investments.
The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents in bank
deposit accounts with various major financial institutions
which, at times may exceed federally insured limits. The Company
has not experienced any losses in such deposit accounts. The
Company believes it is not exposed to any significant credit
risk on cash and cash equivalents.
Concentrations of credit risk with respect to customer
receivables are minimal, due to the low dollar amount of each
receivable, the large number of customers and the large
dispersion of the receivables across many geographic areas.
Funeral and cemetery merchandise and service trust investments
represent customer payments on pre-need funeral contracts and
pre-need cemetery contracts that are placed into state regulated
trusts, and generally do not subject the Company to significant
collection risk. Funds placed into certain state regulated
trusts are limited to federally insured deposits and or
U.S. Government bonds. The Companys policies with
respect to trust fund investments are specifically designed such
that investments are
F-143
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
diversified primarily in cash, fixed income and equity
securities and are maintained with various high quality and
reputable counterparties, as well as to minimize concentrations
of credit risk by not maintaining disproportionately large
balances in any one financial counterparty. As of
December 31, 2005, the Company had a significant
concentration of small restricted cash trust accounts in the
aggregate amount of $53,177,000 (2004 $63,175,000)
with one financial institution.
A summary of the cost and fair values of financial instruments
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
January 1, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Carrying Value | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Carrying Value | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Amounts receivable from funeral trusts (see Note 3)
|
|
$ |
29,893 |
|
|
$ |
29,893 |
|
|
$ |
27,243 |
|
|
$ |
27,243 |
|
Long-term debt (see Note 6)
|
|
|
373,475 |
|
|
|
380,475 |
|
|
|
463,640 |
|
|
|
480,682 |
|
Derivative instruments (see Note 21)
|
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
2,087 |
|
|
|
2,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
404,309 |
|
|
$ |
411,309 |
|
|
$ |
492,970 |
|
|
$ |
510,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, receivables,
and accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximates fair
value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.
The carrying amount of funeral, cemetery and perpetual care
trust investment and insurance investments are classified as
available for sale securities and recorded at fair value based
on quoted market prices.
|
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments |
The Company accounts for its derivative financial instruments in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, as amended
(FAS No. 133). The Company records
derivative instruments in the consolidated balance sheet as
either an asset or liability measured at its fair value. Changes
in the derivatives fair value are recognized currently in
earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. The
Company formally documents, designates and assesses the
effectiveness of transactions that receive hedge accounting.
The Company has a significant portion of its corporate and
administrative functions in Canada. Expenses for these functions
are paid principally in Canadian dollars and have predictable
future cash outflows (Foreign Currency Expenditure).
The Company has a program to hedge the variability in the United
States dollar equivalent of a portion of the Foreign Currency
Expenditure due to the fluctuation in the exchange rate between
the United States dollar and Canadian dollar (Foreign
Currency Hedge Program). The Company uses forward foreign
exchange contracts and foreign exchange option contracts to
partially mitigate foreign exchange variability. In accordance
with FAS No. 133, the Company has designated the
Foreign Currency Hedge Program as qualifying for hedge
accounting.
For derivatives that qualify and are designated as hedges of
future cash flows, the effective portion of changes in fair
values (the Effective Portion) are reported in
stockholders equity under accumulated other comprehensive
income. The Effective Portion is recognized in earnings and
included in general and administrative expense when the related
Foreign Currency Expenditure affects earnings. In cases where
the Company revises its Foreign Currency Expenditure estimates,
the Effective Portion attributable to the extent of any downward
change in the Foreign Currency Expenditure estimates will be
reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to
current earnings and included in general and administrative
expenses. The Company designates the change in fair value of
forward foreign exchange contracts due to the change in forward
points and the change in fair value of foreign exchange option
contracts due to the
F-144
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
change in time value as the Ineffective Portion. The
changes in fair values of derivatives that are not designated as
hedges and the Ineffective Portion are recognized currently and
included with foreign exchange gains/losses, which are reported
in general and administrative expense.
|
|
|
Stock based compensation plans |
The Company accounts for stock-based employee compensation
arrangements in accordance with provisions of Accounting
Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, as
interpreted by Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Interpretation No. 44
(FIN 44), Accounting for Certain
Transactions Involving Stock Compensation an
Interpretation of APB 25 and Emerging Issues Task
Force No. 00-23
(EITF 00-23),
Issues related to the Accounting for Stock Compensation
under APB 25 and FIN 44, and FASB Interpretation
No. 28, Accounting for Stock Appreciation Rights and
Other Variable Stock Option or Award Plans, and complies
with the disclosure provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 148,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
Transition and Disclosure an amendment of
SFAS 123.
Under APB Opinion No. 25, compensation expense is based on
the difference, if any, on the date of the grant, between the
fair value of the Companys stock and the exercise price.
Compensation expense is also recorded when the number of shares
to be issued upon exercise is not determinable, as with the
tandem appreciation right where the number of shares issued is
dependent upon the exchange of the option for the tandem
appreciation right. SFAS No. 123 as amended by
SFAS No. 148 requires a fair-value based method of
accounting for an employee stock option or similar equity
instrument.
Had compensation cost for the Companys stock-based plan,
including options grants and restricted stock issuances been
determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model at the
grant date for awards granted in accordance with the provisions
of SFAS No. 123, the Companys net income would
have been the amounts indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks | |
|
52 Weeks | |
|
53 Weeks | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
January 3, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net income, as reported
|
|
$ |
41,183 |
|
|
$ |
9,349 |
|
|
$ |
10,807 |
|
Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under
fair value-based method, net of tax
|
|
|
(2,805 |
) |
|
|
(2,584 |
) |
|
|
(2,479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
$ |
38,378 |
|
|
$ |
6,765 |
|
|
$ |
8,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic, as reported
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
Basic, pro forma
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
Diluted, as reported
|
|
|
0.99 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
Diluted, pro forma
|
|
|
0.92 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability
method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the future tax consequences attributable to differences between
the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases, and operating loss
and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to
apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or
F-145
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a
change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that
includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided
against deferred tax assets to the extent recoverability of the
asset cannot be considered to be more likely than not.
In accordance with the principles of fresh start reporting, any
future reduction of valuation allowances established at the
Effective Date as a result of the utilization of benefits will
reduce goodwill established at the Effective Date or, if such
goodwill has been reduced to zero, increase capital in excess of
par value.
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation |
The assets and liabilities of the Companys foreign
subsidiaries, which have a functional currency other than the
U.S. dollar, are translated into U.S. dollars at the
rates of exchange as of the consolidated balance sheet date, and
revenue and expenses are translated at the average rates of
exchange for the periods of operation. The net gains or losses
arising from the translations are included in stockholders
equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income
in the consolidated statement of stockholders equity.
Certain comparative amounts have been reclassified to conform to
the presentation adopted in the current year, due to, among
other things, the reclassification of assets held for sale as
discontinued operations.
|
|
|
Accounting changes and recent accounting standards |
|
|
|
Recent accounting standards |
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment
(FAS No. 123R). FAS No. 123R
requires companies to recognize compensation expense in an
amount equal to the fair value of the share-based payment
(including share options, restricted share plans,
performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and
employee share purchase plans) issued to employees.
FAS No. 123R applies to all transactions involving
issuance of equity by a Company in exchange for goods and
services, including employee services. FAS No. 123R is
effective in the first interim or annual reporting period of the
first fiscal year beginning on or after June 15, 2005. The
Company will adopt FAS No. 123R in the first fiscal
quarter of its 2006 fiscal year and expects to use the modified
prospective application method, which results in no restatement
of the Companys previously issued annual consolidated
financial statements. The adoption of FAS No. 123R is
expected to result in additional compensation expense of
approximately $3.7 million for the 2006 fiscal year.
|
|
NOTE 3. |
PRE-NEED FUNERAL RECEIVABLES AND TRUST INVESTMENTS |
The balance in pre-need funeral receivables and trust
investments represents customer receivables and funeral trust
investments related to unperformed, price-guaranteed, pre-need
funeral contracts. The
F-146
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
components of pre-need funeral receivables and trust investments
in the consolidated balance sheets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Customer receivables
|
|
$ |
38,438 |
|
|
$ |
37,146 |
|
Allowance for contract cancellations and refunds
|
|
|
(15,988 |
) |
|
|
(17,287 |
) |
Funeral trust investments
|
|
|
282,084 |
|
|
|
288,928 |
|
Amounts receivable from funeral trusts
|
|
|
29,893 |
|
|
|
27,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-need funeral receivables and trust investments
|
|
$ |
334,427 |
|
|
$ |
336,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For customer receivables, an allowance for cancellations and
refunds is provided at the date of pre-need funeral contract
sale based on managements best estimates and is offset by
an allowance against deferred pre-need funeral contract revenue.
Certain of the funeral trusts have not been consolidated,
because the Company is not the primary beneficiary. Accordingly,
they are reported as amounts receivable from funeral trusts.
Amounts receivable from funeral trusts represent a portion of
the proceeds from the sale of pre-need funeral services,
deposited in accordance with state and provincial trusting laws
with various financial institutions, together with accrued
earnings. The Company will recognize and generally receive these
amounts when the merchandise is delivered or service is
performed.
As of December 31, 2005, the fair value of funeral trust
investments classified as available-for-sale securities was
based on quoted market prices. The carrying values of restricted
cash and cash equivalents, and other investments approximate
their fair values, due to their short-term to maturity. Funeral
trust investments are evaluated for other-than-temporary
impairment. Other-than-temporary impairment is required to be
reflected in current earnings as a realized loss. It is possible
that changes in interest rates, equity prices and other economic
conditions in the near term could result in other-than-temporary
impairment that could be significant to the Company.
It is not practical to estimate the fair value of amounts
receivable from funeral trusts, because they are commingled with
other third party funds in various trusts.
F-147
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
The table below shows funeral trust investments at their fair
values.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and other Government obligations
|
|
$ |
22,724 |
|
|
$ |
18,425 |
|
|
|
U.S. Government agencies
|
|
|
13,145 |
|
|
|
11,683 |
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
12,318 |
|
|
|
10,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total bonds
|
|
|
48,187 |
|
|
|
40,433 |
|
|
|
Mortgaged-backed
|
|
|
20,357 |
|
|
|
17,288 |
|
|
|
Asset-backed
|
|
|
2,920 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed income securities
|
|
|
71,464 |
|
|
|
59,221 |
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
79,645 |
|
|
|
63,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale
|
|
|
151,109 |
|
|
|
122,398 |
|
Restricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
101,598 |
|
|
|
131,105 |
|
Other
|
|
|
29,377 |
|
|
|
35,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral trust investments
|
|
$ |
282,084 |
|
|
$ |
288,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains
|
|
$ |
11,709 |
|
|
$ |
9,124 |
|
Unrealized losses
|
|
|
(4,758 |
) |
|
|
(2,007 |
) |
Realized investment income from the funeral trust investments,
including realized gains and losses are recorded in other
expense (income).
During the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005, funeral
trust available-for-sale securities with a cost of $177,151,000
were sold for proceeds of $178,995,000, resulting in $5,368,000
and $3,524,000 of realized gains and losses, respectively. The
first in, first out method was used to determine the cost of
funeral trust available-for-sale securities disposed of. The
Company has determined that unrealized losses in the funeral
trust investments are not other-than-temporary, as the
unrealized losses were due to temporary fluctuations in interest
rates and equity prices.
The Company generally recommends to the trustee the mix of
equities and fixed income securities in accordance with policies
set by an investment committee comprised of members of senior
management. The investment committee sets the mix of investments
within the investment parameters set by various state and
provincial regulators and with the assistance of independent
professional financial advisors. The policy emphasizes a capital
preservation approach while maintaining acceptable levels of
income and capital appreciation.
F-148
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
Maturities of fixed income securities are estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
Due in one year or less
|
|
$ |
769 |
|
Due in one to five years
|
|
|
26,858 |
|
Due in five to ten years
|
|
|
13,936 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
29,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
71,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 4. |
PRE-NEED CEMETERY RECEIVABLES AND TRUST INVESTMENTS |
The components of pre-need cemetery receivables and trust
investments in the consolidated balance sheets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Customer receivables
|
|
$ |
61,749 |
|
|
$ |
64,130 |
|
Unearned finance income
|
|
|
(6,232 |
) |
|
|
(5,759 |
) |
Allowance for contract cancellations and refunds
|
|
|
(15,648 |
) |
|
|
(17,538 |
) |
Cemetery merchandise and service trust investments
|
|
|
267,453 |
|
|
|
270,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
307,322 |
|
|
$ |
311,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery merchandise and service trust investments represent a
portion of the proceeds from the sale of pre-need merchandise
and services, deposited in accordance with state and provincial
trusting laws with various financial institutions, together with
accrued earnings as of December 31, 2005. The Company will
recognize and generally receive these amounts when the
merchandise is delivered or service is performed.
For pre-need cemetery contract sales, other than sales of
pre-need cemetery interment rights, which are recognized in
accordance with the retail land sales provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 66, Accounting for
Sales of Real Estate, an allowance for cancellations and
refunds is provided at the time of sale based on
managements best estimates and is offset by an allowance
against deferred pre-need funeral and cemetery revenue. For
customer receivables, an allowance is provided at the time of
the pre-need cemetery contract sale.
As of December 31, 2005, the fair value of cemetery
merchandise and service trust investments classified as
available-for-sale securities was based on quoted market prices.
The carrying values of restricted cash and cash equivalents, and
other investments approximate their fair values, due to their
short-term to maturity. Cemetery trust investments are evaluated
for other-than-temporary impairment. Other-than-temporary
impairment is required to be reflected in current earnings as a
realized loss. It is possible that changes in interest rates,
equity prices and other economic conditions in the near term
could result in other than temporary impairment that could be
significant to the Company.
The fair value of customer receivables is not materially
different from book value, because of the large number of
individual contracts, which generally have terms of one to seven
years and contractual or imputed interest rates ranging from
8.00% to 9.75% per annum.
F-149
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
The table below shows cemetery merchandise and service trust
investments at their fair values.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and other Government obligations
|
|
$ |
44,647 |
|
|
$ |
49,773 |
|
|
|
U.S. Government agencies
|
|
|
20,130 |
|
|
|
24,729 |
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
21,081 |
|
|
|
19,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total bonds
|
|
|
85,858 |
|
|
|
94,492 |
|
|
|
Mortgaged-backed
|
|
|
36,826 |
|
|
|
34,792 |
|
|
|
Asset-backed
|
|
|
5,883 |
|
|
|
3,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed income securities
|
|
|
128,567 |
|
|
|
132,430 |
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
100,069 |
|
|
|
99,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale
|
|
|
228,636 |
|
|
|
232,275 |
|
Restricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
30,257 |
|
|
|
37,120 |
|
Other
|
|
|
8,560 |
|
|
|
1,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery trust investments
|
|
$ |
267,453 |
|
|
$ |
270,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains
|
|
$ |
13,709 |
|
|
$ |
16,194 |
|
Unrealized losses
|
|
|
(6,341 |
) |
|
|
(3,083 |
) |
Realized investment income from the cemetery merchandise and
service trust investments, including realized gains and losses
are recorded in other expense (income).
During the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005, cemetery
merchandise and service trust available-for-sale securities with
a cost of $160,541,000 were sold for proceeds of $162,212,000,
resulting in $4,865,000 and $3,194,000 of realized gains and
losses, respectively. The first in, first out method was used to
determine the cost of cemetery trust available-for-sale
securities disposed of. The Company has determined that
unrealized losses in the cemetery merchandise and service trust
investments are not other-than-temporary, as the unrealized
losses were due to temporary fluctuations in interest rates and
equity prices.
The Company recommends to the trustee the mix of equities and
fixed income securities in accordance with policies set by an
investment committee comprised of members of senior management.
The investment committee sets the mix of investments within the
investment parameters set by various state and provincial
regulators and with the assistance of independent professional
financial advisors. The policy set by the investment committee
emphasizes, through an investment grade focus, a capital
preservation approach while maintaining acceptable levels of
income and capital appreciation.
F-150
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
Maturities of fixed income securities are estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
Due in one year or less
|
|
$ |
1,099 |
|
Due in one to five years
|
|
|
48,327 |
|
Due in five to ten years
|
|
|
24,512 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
54,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
128,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
The customer receivables as of December 31, 2005, are
expected to mature as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of | |
|
|
Fiscal Year | |
|
|
| |
2006
|
|
$ |
32,416 |
|
2007
|
|
|
15,070 |
|
2008
|
|
|
7,382 |
|
2009
|
|
|
3,778 |
|
2010
|
|
|
1,521 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
61,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 5. |
CEMETERY PERPETUAL CARE TRUST INVESTMENTS |
A portion of the proceeds from cemetery sales for interment
rights is generally required by law to be paid into perpetual
care trusts.
As of December 31, 2005, the fair value of perpetual care
trust investments classified as available-for-sale securities
were based on quoted market prices. The carrying values of
restricted cash and cash equivalents, and other investments
approximate their fair values, due to their short-term to
maturity. Perpetual care trust investments are evaluated for
other-than-temporary impairment. Other-than-temporary impairment
is reflected as a reduction in perpetual care trust investments
with an offsetting reduction in non-controlling interest in
perpetual care trust. It is possible that changes in interest
rates, equity prices and other economic conditions in the near
term could result in other than temporary impairment that could
be significant to the Company.
F-151
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
The table below shows perpetual care trust investments at their
fair values.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and other Government obligations
|
|
$ |
52,918 |
|
|
$ |
36,871 |
|
|
|
U.S. Government agencies
|
|
|
28,043 |
|
|
|
34,664 |
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
35,346 |
|
|
|
38,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total bonds
|
|
|
116,307 |
|
|
|
109,968 |
|
|
|
Mortgaged-backed
|
|
|
63,548 |
|
|
|
74,707 |
|
|
|
Asset-backed
|
|
|
12,089 |
|
|
|
11,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed income securities
|
|
|
191,944 |
|
|
|
195,994 |
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
28,158 |
|
|
|
27,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale
|
|
|
220,102 |
|
|
|
223,667 |
|
Restricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
23,263 |
|
|
|
21,611 |
|
Other
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments
|
|
$ |
243,805 |
|
|
$ |
246,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains
|
|
$ |
4,084 |
|
|
$ |
5,271 |
|
Unrealized losses
|
|
|
(5,535 |
) |
|
|
(2,344 |
) |
During the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005, perpetual
care trust available-for-sale securities with a cost of
$147,912,000 were sold for proceeds of $149,451,000, resulting
in $4,482,000 and $2,943,000 of realized gains and losses,
respectively. The first in, first out method was used to
determine the cost of perpetual care trust available-for-sale
securities disposed of. The Company has determined that
unrealized losses in the perpetual care trust investments are
not other-than-temporary, as the unrealized losses were due to
temporary fluctuations in interest rates and equity prices.
The Company recommends to the trustee the mix of equities and
fixed income securities in accordance with policies set by an
investment committee comprised of members of senior management.
The investment committee sets the mix of investments within the
investment parameters set by various state and provincial
regulators and with the assistance of independent professional
financial advisors. The policy set by the investment committee
emphasizes, through an investment grade focus, a capital
preservation approach while maintaining acceptable levels of
income and capital appreciation.
Maturities of fixed income securities are estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
Due in one year or less
|
|
$ |
1,196 |
|
Due in one to five years
|
|
|
65,463 |
|
Due in five to ten years
|
|
|
35,456 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
89,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
191,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-152
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
Long-term debt consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
January 1, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Carrying | |
|
Fair | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Fair | |
|
|
Value | |
|
Value | |
|
Value | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revolving credit facility(a)
|
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Senior secured term loan B due in 2009(a)(b)
|
|
|
161,683 |
|
|
|
161,683 |
|
|
|
246,826 |
|
|
|
246,826 |
|
7.75% Senior unsecured notes due in 2012(c)
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
207,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
216,760 |
|
12.25% Senior unsecured notes due in 2009(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,509 |
|
|
|
4,791 |
|
Promissory notes and capitalized obligations, certain of which
are secured by assets of certain subsidiaries
|
|
|
7,792 |
|
|
|
7,792 |
|
|
|
12,305 |
|
|
|
12,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
373,475 |
|
|
|
380,475 |
|
|
|
463,640 |
|
|
|
480,682 |
|
Less, current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
2,435 |
|
|
|
2,435 |
|
|
|
9,083 |
|
|
|
9,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
371,040 |
|
|
$ |
378,040 |
|
|
$ |
454,557 |
|
|
$ |
471,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
In 2003, the Company entered into a senior secured facility (the
Credit Agreement), which after subsequent
amendments, includes a $368,000,000 Senior Secured Term
Loan B due September 29, 2009 (the Term
Loan B) and a $75,000,000 revolving credit facility
(the Revolving Credit Facility), of which
$35,000,000 is available in the form of letters of credit. |
|
|
|
The Revolving Credit Facility is intended to be used primarily
to fund the Companys working capital requirements. The
Revolving Credit Facility bears interest at a rate per annum in
accordance with graduated pricing based upon the Companys
consolidated leverage ratio, and the Company has the option to
elect an interest rate equal to either (i) a base rate
(7.25% at December 31, 2005), plus 1.75% (based upon the
Companys consolidated leverage ratio at December 31,
2005), or (ii) LIBOR (4.54% for the three-month LIBOR at
December 31, 2005), plus 2.75% (based upon the
Companys consolidated leverage ratio at December 31,
2005). An annual fee of 0.50% is charged on the unused portion
of the Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility
matures on September 29, 2008. |
|
|
|
Material covenants in the Credit Agreement include a requirement
to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio and fixed charge
coverage ratio, a requirement not to exceed a maximum leverage
ratio, an annual maximum on capital expenditures and cemetery
development, and specified maximum amounts for capital lease
obligations, indebtedness, acquisitions, certain investments,
and sales of accounts receivable. Outstanding principal amounts
and interest accrued and unpaid may, at the election of the
requisite lenders, become immediately due and payable and
further commitments by the lenders to make loans may, at the
election of the requisite lenders, be terminated upon the
occurrence of events of default specified in the Credit
Agreement. As of December 31, 2005, the Company was in
compliance with all covenants and was not in breach of any
provision of the Credit Agreement that would cause an event of
default to occur. The Credit Agreement is secured by specified
real property, and substantially all personal property of
Alderwoods Group and specified subsidiaries. |
|
|
|
On March 18, 2005, Alderwoods Group, Inc. entered into an
amendment to the Credit Agreement. The amendment modifies the
Credit Agreement to provide Alderwoods Group, Inc. additional
flexibility to introduce an employee stock purchase plan and
other long-term incentive plans, increase |
F-153
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
the letter of credit sub-limit under the Revolving Credit
Facility to $35,000,000 from $25,000,000, and make certain other
agreed upon changes. |
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2005, the amount available under the
Revolving Credit Facility was $75,000,000, less $17,644,000 in
outstanding letters of credit and a revolving credit facility
balance of $4,000,000. |
|
(b) |
|
The Term Loan B provides the Company with an option to
elect an interest rate equal to either (i) a base rate
(7.25% at December 31, 2005), plus 1.00%, or
(ii) LIBOR (4.54% for the three-month LIBOR at
December 31, 2005), plus 2.00%. The weighted average rate
of interest was 6.31% at December 31, 2005. The Term
Loan B is repayable in quarterly principal installments
from December 31, 2005, to June 13, 2009 (subject to
reduction for prepayments) of 0.25% of the aggregate principal
amount of the Term Loan B outstanding as of
December 3, 2004, with a lump sum payment of the
then-outstanding amount on the maturity date. The Company has
prepaid the required quarterly principal installments up to and
including the first quarter of its 2007 fiscal year. |
|
|
|
As a result of the amendment to the Credit Agreement on
August 19, 2004, the Company expensed $1,164,000 of
unamortized deferred finance costs, which is included in
interest expense for the 52 weeks ended January 1,
2005. In addition, $3,280,000 of refinancing fees and costs
incurred in connection with the Credit Agreement amendments on
August 19, 2004, and December 3, 2004, is also
included in interest expense for the 52 weeks ended
January 1, 2005. |
|
(c) |
|
On August 19, 2004, the Company issued the
7.75% Senior Unsecured Notes, due in 2012 (the
Eight-Year Senior Unsecured Notes). Interest accrues
at an annual rate of 7.75% and is payable semi-annually on March
15 and September 15 or, if such day is not a business day, the
next succeeding business day. At any time prior to
September 15, 2007, the Company may, at its option, redeem
up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the Eight-Year
Senior Unsecured Notes at a redemption price of 107.75% of the
stated principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest and
Liquidated Damages (as defined in the indenture governing the
Eight-Year Senior Unsecured Notes), if any, with net cash
proceeds from specified equity offerings, provided at least 65%
of the aggregate principal amount of the Eight-Year Senior
Unsecured Notes remains outstanding and the redemption occurs
within 90 days of the date of the closing of the specified
equity offering. On or after September 15, 2008, the
Company may, at its option, redeem all or part of the Eight-Year
Senior Unsecured Notes at the redemption prices (expressed as
percentages of the stated principal amount) set forth below,
plus accrued and unpaid interest and Liquidated Damages, if any,
if redeemed during the twelve-month period beginning on
September 15 of the years indicated below: |
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
2008
|
|
|
103.875 |
|
2009
|
|
|
101.938 |
|
2010 and thereafter
|
|
|
100.000 |
|
|
|
|
(d) |
|
On January 2, 2002, the Company issued the
12.25% Senior Unsecured Notes, due 2009. On April 21,
2004, the Company repurchased the principal amount of $9,248,000
at a premium of $1,110,000, plus accrued interest. The premium
is included in interest expense for the 52 weeks ended
January 1, 2005. |
|
|
|
On August 19, 2004, the Company repurchased the principal
amount of $316,243,000 at a premium of $31,340,000, plus accrued
interest pursuant to an offer to purchase and consent
solicitation. The premium is included in interest expense for
the 52 weeks ended January 1, 2005. |
|
|
|
On January 3, 2005, the Company repurchased the remaining
principal amount of $4,509,000 at a premium of $282,000, plus
accrued interest. The premium is included in interest expense
for the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005. |
F-154
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
The Credit Agreement and the Eight-Year Senior Unsecured Notes
are guaranteed by substantially all of Alderwoods Groups
wholly-owned U.S. subsidiaries, other than Alderwoods
Groups insurance subsidiaries and other specified excluded
subsidiaries. Alderwoods Group, the parent company, has no
independent assets or operations, and the guarantees of its
guarantor subsidiaries are full and unconditional, and joint and
several.
In certain change of control situations, Alderwoods Group is
required to make an offer to purchase the then-outstanding
Eight-Year Senior Unsecured Notes at a price equal to 101% of
their stated principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest
to the applicable repurchase date and Liquidated Damages, if any.
The Credit Agreement and the indenture governing the Eight-Year
Senior Unsecured Notes restrict the Companys ability to
engage in asset sales. The Credit Agreement and the indenture
governing the Eight-Year Senior Unsecured Notes prohibit
dispositions of assets unless the assets disposed of fulfill the
requirements of specified exceptions. The indenture governing
the Eight-Year Senior Unsecured Notes excepts, among other
exceptions, assets with a fair market value less than
$5,000,000. One specified exception contained in the Credit
Agreement is dispositions of any of a group of identified
discontinued assets; another is dispositions of
assets not exceeding $35,000,000 book value in the aggregate
over the life of the Credit Agreement, provided that
(i) the consideration received is at least equal to fair
market value and (ii) not less than 75% of the
consideration is paid in cash or cash equivalents. Within
270 days of the receipt of net proceeds from any such asset
sale, the Company has the ability to apply such net proceeds at
its option (or as otherwise required) to invest in non-current
operating assets (or enter into agreements for such investment
which agreements are consummated within 360 days of such
receipt of asset sale proceeds). Up to $10,000,000 of such net
proceeds in any fiscal year (but not in excess of $40,000,000 in
the aggregate over the term of the Credit Agreement) may be
applied to make capital expenditures. To the extent the Company
receives net proceeds in excess of additional specified
thresholds and such excess is not applied to invest in
non-current operating assets or make capital expenditures as
described in the two immediately preceding sentences, the
Company must make mandatory repayments under the Credit
Agreement and, after all indebtedness under the Credit Agreement
has been repaid, offer to purchase the Eight-Year Senior
Unsecured Notes at a purchase price equal to 100.00% of the
stated principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest and
Liquidated Damages, if any.
Covenants in the Credit Agreement and the indenture governing
the Eight-Year Senior Unsecured Notes restrict, and under
specified circumstances prohibit, the payment of dividends by
the Company.
In connection with the issuance of the Eight-Year Senior
Unsecured Notes, the Company entered into a registration rights
agreement, pursuant to which the Company was required, on or
prior to May 16, 2005, to file an exchange offer
registration statement on an appropriate form under the
Securities Act of 1933 with the SEC. On May 12, 2005, the
Company filed the exchange offer registration statement with the
SEC. The registration statement was subsequently declared
effective by the SEC on June 7, 2005. On June 8, 2005,
the Company commenced an exchange offer (the Exchange
Offer) pursuant to which holders of the Eight-Year Senior
Unsecured Notes were given the opportunity to exchange their
outstanding notes for new notes with substantially identical
terms covered by the exchange offer registration statement. The
Company consummated the Exchange Offer on July 18, 2005.
F-155
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
Maturities of long-term debt principal are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of | |
|
|
Fiscal Year | |
|
|
| |
2006
|
|
$ |
2,435 |
|
2007
|
|
|
4,055 |
|
2008
|
|
|
7,618 |
|
2009
|
|
|
157,570 |
|
2010
|
|
|
184 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
201,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
373,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 7. |
INSURANCE ACTIVITIES |
Revenue from insurance operations is comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended | |
|
52 Weeks Ended | |
|
53 Weeks Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
January 3, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Premiums
|
|
$ |
81,943 |
|
|
$ |
67,833 |
|
|
$ |
52,251 |
|
Interest, dividend and other investment income
|
|
|
13,036 |
|
|
|
10,560 |
|
|
|
8,753 |
|
Realized investment gains
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
1,731 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
95,005 |
|
|
$ |
80,124 |
|
|
$ |
61,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2005 and January 1, 2005, the fair
values of insurance operation investments classified as
available-for-sale were based on quoted market prices. The
carrying values of cash and short-term investments and other
investments approximate their fair values, due to their
short-term to maturity. Fixed maturity securities are classified
as available-for-sale and carried at fair value. Investments in
debt securities are evaluated for other than temporary
impairment. Other temporary impairment is reflected in current
period income as a realized loss. It is possible that a
significant change in economic conditions in
F-156
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
the near term could result in losses that could be significant
to the Company. Insurance invested assets carrying and fair
values consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and other Government obligations
|
|
$ |
37,378 |
|
|
$ |
36,405 |
|
|
|
U.S. state and political subdivisions
|
|
|
1,235 |
|
|
|
1,201 |
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
114,715 |
|
|
|
107,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total bonds
|
|
|
153,328 |
|
|
|
145,587 |
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgages
|
|
|
66,455 |
|
|
|
47,490 |
|
|
|
Mortgaged-backed
|
|
|
56,028 |
|
|
|
45,385 |
|
|
|
Asset-backed
|
|
|
15,773 |
|
|
|
10,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale
|
|
|
291,584 |
|
|
|
248,689 |
|
Cash and short-term investments
|
|
|
2,917 |
|
|
|
2,004 |
|
Other
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance invested assets
|
|
$ |
294,598 |
|
|
$ |
250,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains
|
|
$ |
6,435 |
|
|
$ |
7,666 |
|
Unrealized losses
|
|
|
(3,239 |
) |
|
|
714 |
|
During the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005, insurance
investments classified as available-for-sale with a cost of
$37,357,000 (2004 $40,021,000), were sold for
proceeds of $37,382,000 (2004 $41,752,000),
resulting in $565,000 (2004 $1,976,000) and $540,000
(2004 $245,000) of realized gains and losses,
respectively. The specific cost method was used to determine the
cost of available-for-sale securities disposed of. The Company
has determined that unrealized losses in insurance invested
assets are not other-than-temporary, as the unrealized losses
were due to temporary fluctuations in interest rates.
Insurance invested assets are predominantly in fixed income
securities. The Company manages the mix of fixed income
securities in accordance with policies set by an investment
committee comprised of members of senior management. The
investment committee sets and modifies the mix of investments
with the assistance of independent professional financial
advisors. The policy emphasizes a conservative approach while
maintaining acceptable levels of income and capital appreciation.
Maturities of fixed income securities are estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Due in one year or less
|
|
$ |
10,502 |
|
|
$ |
1,904 |
|
Due in one to five years
|
|
|
35,212 |
|
|
|
43,760 |
|
Due in five to ten years
|
|
|
29,951 |
|
|
|
21,125 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
77,663 |
|
|
|
78,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
153,328 |
|
|
$ |
145,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-157
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
|
|
NOTE 8. |
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
The Company is authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of
Preferred Stock, with a par value of $0.01 per share, of
which none have been issued.
The Company is authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of
Common Stock, with a par value of $0.01 per share.
In addition, warrants to purchase 2,992,000 shares of
Common Stock were issued on the Effective Date, January 2,
2002. The warrants entitle the holders to purchase, at any time
up to January 2, 2007, shares of Common Stock at an
exercise price of $25.76 per share. The exercise price of
the warrants exceeded the fair value of the Companys
Common Stock on the date of issuance and throughout the
52 weeks ended December 31, 2005, 53 weeks ended
January 1, 2005, and 53 weeks ended January 3,
2004. None of the warrants have been exercised.
|
|
|
Stock Based Compensation Plans |
Director Compensation Plan
Pursuant to the Companys Director Compensation Plan (the
Director Compensation Plan), each director of the
Company who is not an employee of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries has the option of receiving his or her annual base
retainer and attendance fees in cash, Common Stock or a
combination thereof. Further, each participant may elect to have
Common Stock paid in the form of deferred Common stock
(Deferred Stock), which will be credited to a
booking account in the name of the participant. The Deferred
Stock is subject to a deferral period during which the
participant has no right to transfer any rights under his or her
Deferred Stock and has no other rights of ownership therein. The
Company has reserved 100,000 shares of Common Stock for
issuance as compensation in lieu of cash under the Director
Compensation Plan, of which 53,674 shares have been issued
as of December 31, 2005.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
In 2005, the Companys shareholders approved the adoption
of a compensatory employee stock purchase plan to provide for
the purchase on the open market, to a maximum of
1,100,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company. Eligible
employees may authorize payroll deductions of up to 5% of their
regular base salary to purchase shares of Common Stock of the
Company on the open market on a monthly basis. The Company will
make a cash contribution to purchase shares of Common Stock of
the Company as additional compensation to each participant equal
to 50% of the employees contribution for that month.
During the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005, a total
of 46,653 shares were purchased and distributed to
employees at an average price of $16.10 per share and
compensation expense of $250,000 was incurred.
2005-2007 Executive Strategic Incentive Plan
The 2005-2007 Executive Strategic Incentive Plan, approved by
the Board of Directors on July 21, 2005, is a performance
based compensation plan designed to motivate and reward the
senior management team for achieving shareholder value
objectives. The plan provides cash awards to the senior
executives based on the Companys Common Stock reaching a
threshold target price of $17.00 in December 2007. The amount of
the cash award increases the more the stock price exceeds the
$17.00 threshold target price. Achieving a stock price of $17.00
results in an aggregate cash award of $5.6 million.
Achieving a stock price of $18.00 results in an aggregate cash
award of $8.0 million. The aggregate cash award
F-158
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
increases by $1.6 million for every $1.00 in stock
appreciation beyond $18.00. No compensation expense was recorded
in the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005 as market
value at December 31, 2005 was less than the threshold
target price for the Executive Strategic Incentive Plan.
2005 Equity Incentive Plan
In April of 2005, the Companys shareholders approved the
2005 Equity Incentive Plan that permits the grant of
(i) options to the employees and members of the
Companys Board of Directors, with or without tandem
appreciation rights, and (ii) restricted Common Stock
units. A total of 1,800,000 shares are reserved for grant
under the plan. Stock options have
3-year terms and vest
at a rate of 25% on the first, 25% on the second and 50% on the
third anniversaries of the date of grant.
The tandem appreciation rights entitle the employee to exchange
the employees option right for a number of shares equal in
value to the appreciated value of the options. The exchange of
the option for the tandem appreciation right requires an
immediate exercise of the tandem appreciation right and will
cause the immediate termination of the related option right. An
exchange of an option right for a tandem appreciation right may
only be made when the relevant option is otherwise exercisable.
Although the options granted had an exercise price equal to or
greater than the market value of the underlying Common Stock on
the grant date, the number of shares to be issued upon exercise
is not determinable as it is dependent upon the exchange of the
option for a tandem appreciation right. In applying the
intrinsic value-based method, the Company did not record a
stock-based compensation expense for the 52 weeks ended
December 31, 2005 as the market value at December 31,
2005 was less than the exercise price.
As of December 31, 2005, the Company had granted
242,200 shares of restricted Common Stock units to
employees. The restricted Common Stock units do not vest for the
first three years after the date grant. Thereafter, the
restricted Common Stock units vest in years 3 to 10 based upon
the share price of the Companys Common Stock. After three
years of service, the restricted Common Stock units vest 70% at
a $17 share price, and an additional 15% at a
$17.50 share price and the final 15% at an $18 share
price. Once granted, the restricted Common Stock units are not
included in total shares outstanding and are not included in the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding in each
period used to calculate basic earnings per share until vested.
No compensation expense was recorded in the 52 weeks ended
December 31, 2005 as market value at December 31, 2005
was less than the vesting price for the restricted Common Stock
units.
2002 Equity Incentive Plan
On January 2, 2002 the Company implemented the 2002 Equity
Incentive Plan that permits the grants of stock options to the
employees and members of the Companys Board of Directors.
A total of 4,500,000 shares are reserved for grant under
the plan. Stock options are granted with an exercise price equal
to the stocks fair market value at the date of grant.
Except in certain cases, stock options have
3-year terms and vest
at a rate of 25% on the first, 25% on the second and 50% on the
third anniversaries of the date of grant. For option grants
under the 2002 Equity Plan, no stock-based compensation expense
was recorded in the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005,
52 weeks ended January 1, 2005 and 53 weeks ended
January 3, 2004, as all options granted under this plan had
an exercise price equal to or greater than the market value of
the underlying Common Stock on the grant date.
F-159
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
The following is a summary of the total number of outstanding
stock options and restricted Common Stock units under both plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding | |
|
Weighted Average | |
|
Outstanding Restricted | |
|
Weighted Average | |
|
|
Options | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
Common Stock Units | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(thousands) | |
|
(dollars per | |
|
(thousands) | |
|
(dollars per | |
|
|
|
|
Common share) | |
|
|
|
Common share) | |
Balance at December 28, 2002
|
|
|
3,470 |
|
|
$ |
11.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
|
3.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
7.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(501 |
) |
|
|
11.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 3, 2004
|
|
|
4,185 |
|
|
|
8.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
9.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
5.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2005
|
|
|
4,245 |
|
|
|
8.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,308 |
|
|
|
15.09 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
15.99 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(431 |
) |
|
|
6.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
8.25 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
15.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
5,031 |
|
|
$ |
10.75 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
$ |
15.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding at December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
|
|
Exercisable | |
|
|
Range of |
|
Number | |
|
Remaining | |
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
Common | |
|
Weighted-Average | |
Exercise Prices |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Contractual Life | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
share | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(dollars per Common share) |
|
(thousands) | |
|
(in years) | |
|
(dollars per | |
|
(thousands) | |
|
(dollars per | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common share) | |
|
|
|
Common share) | |
$ 3.65 $ 5.96
|
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
7.24 |
|
|
$ |
3.65 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
$ |
3.65 |
|
$ 5.97 $ 7.59
|
|
|
1,035 |
|
|
|
6.48 |
|
|
|
7.47 |
|
|
|
1,035 |
|
|
|
7.47 |
|
$ 7.60 $13.23
|
|
|
2,049 |
|
|
|
6.59 |
|
|
|
12.95 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
13.19 |
|
$13.24 $15.99
|
|
|
1,028 |
|
|
|
9.57 |
|
|
|
15.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of stock options used to compute the pro forma
net loss and loss per Common share disclosures was calculated as
of the grant date, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model
with the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
January 3, | |
Weighted-average assumptions |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Expected volatility
|
|
|
45.0 |
% |
|
|
41.5 |
% |
|
|
32.9 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.64 |
% |
|
|
1.93 |
% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
Expected option life in years
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
F-160
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
The weighted average fair value of the Companys stock
options issued under the 2002 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2005
Equity Incentive Plan, calculated using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model, granted during the 52 weeks ended
December 31, 2005, was $6.70 (2004 $2.84,
2003 $0.96) per option.
The Black-Scholes option-pricing model was developed for use in
estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting
restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition,
option-pricing models require the input of highly subjective
assumptions, including the expected price volatility and option
life. The expected option life is based on the
Predecessors historical experience as well as the vesting
periods and terms of the stock options. The Company uses
expected volatility rates, which are based on a combination of
the Companys historical volatility rates, plus the
historical volatility rates of other companies in the death care
industry, trended into future years. Changes in the subjective
input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate,
and therefore the existing models do not necessarily provide a
reliable single measure of the fair value of the Companys
stock options.
|
|
NOTE 9. |
LEGAL CONTINGENCIES |
The Company is a party to legal proceedings in the ordinary
course of its business, and believes it has made adequate
provision for any potential estimated liabilities.
Funeral Consumers Alliance, Inc. et al v.
Alderwoods Group, Inc. et al was filed in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of California in
April, 2005. This case has been transferred to the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Case
No. CV3394. To date, six separate class action lawsuits,
including, Francis H. Rocha v. Alderwoods Group, Inc.
et al, Marcia Berger v. Alderwoods Group, Inc.
et al, Maria Magsarili and Tony Magsarili v.
Alderwoods Group, Inc. et al, Caren Speizer v.
Alderwoods Group, Inc. et al, and Frank
Moroz v. Alderwoods Group, Inc. et al
(Funeral Consumer Cases) have been consolidated
into this case. Two other cases, also transferred to the United
States District Court for the Southern District of Texas,
Pioneer Valley Casket Co. v. Alderwoods Group, Inc.
et al (Pioneer Valley) and Ralph Fancher
et al v. Alderwoods Group, Inc. et al
(Fancher), have been consolidated into this case
for purposes of discovery only.
All of these cases, including Pioneer Valley and
Fancher are purported class actions on behalf of casket
consumers throughout the United States. The suits name as
defendants the Company and four other public companies involved
in the funeral or casket industry. Except for Fancher,
which alleges violations of State of Tennessee antitrust laws
only, all of the Funeral Consumer Cases and Pioneer Valley
allege that defendants violated federal and state antitrust
laws by engaging in anticompetitive practices with respect to
the sale and pricing of caskets. All of the cases, including
Fancher, seek injunctions, unspecified amounts of
monetary damages, and treble damages. Motions to Dismiss filed
by the Company and all other defendants are pending in the
Funeral Consumer Cases and Pioneer Valley. The Company
intends to file a Motion to Dismiss in the Fancher case
as well. Plaintiffs in all these cases have yet to provide any
meaningful information regarding their alleged damages. As a
result, the Company cannot quantify its ultimate liability, if
any, for the payment of damages. The Company believes
plaintiffs claims are without merit and intends to
vigorously defend itself in these actions.
Richard Sanchez et al v. Alderwoods Group, Inc.
et al was filed in February 2005 in the Superior Court
of the State of California, for the County of Los Angeles,
Central District; Case No.BC328962. Plaintiffs seek to certify a
nationwide class on behalf of all consumers who purchased
funeral goods and services from the Company. Plaintiffs allege
in essence that the Federal Trade Commissions Funeral Rule
requires the Company to disclose its markups on all items
obtained from third-parties in connection with funeral service
contracts. Plaintiffs allege further that the Company has
failed to make such disclosures.
F-161
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
Plaintiffs seek to recover an unspecified amount of monetary
damages, attorneys fees, costs and unspecified
injunctive and declaratory relief. The Company
believes that plaintiffs claims are without merit and
intends to vigorously defend itself in this action.
On July 7, 2005, the Federal Trade Commission (the
FTC) issued a letter advisory opinion regarding the
lawful construction of the term cash advance item as
used in the Funeral Rule. The FTC opined with regard to a
similar lawsuit in Texas state court: The Commission
believes that the court is incorrect in ruling that all goods or
services purchased from a third-party vendor are cash advance
items. This interpretation sweeps far too broadly, potentially
bringing within its scope every component good or service that
comprises a funeral. This was not and is not the
Commissions intention in the cash advance
provisions of the Rule. In our opinion, the term cash
advance item in the Rule applies only to those items that
the funeral provider represents expressly to be cash
advance items or represents by implication to be procured
on behalf of a particular customer and provided to that customer
at the same price the funeral provider paid for them. The
FTC sets forth its analysis in the remainder of the letter.
The Company has learned that a number of plaintiffs to these
actions along with the Funeral Consumers Alliance have filed a
petition against the FTC in the District of Columbia Circuit
Court asking the Court to overturn the FTCs July 7,
2005 Advisory Opinion.
In addition to the funeral and casket antitrust lawsuits, the
Company has received a Civil Investigative Demand, dated
August 4, 2005, from the Attorney General of Maryland on
behalf of itself and other undisclosed state attorneys general,
who have commenced an investigation of alleged anticompetitive
practices in the funeral industry. The Company has received
similar Civil Investigative Demands from the Attorneys General
of Florida and Connecticut.
The ultimate outcome of the litigation matters described above
cannot be determined at this time. An adverse decision in one or
more of such matters could have a material adverse effect on the
Company, its financial condition, results of operation and cash
flows. However, the Company intends to aggressively defend the
lawsuits.
In addition, the Company is party to other legal proceedings in
the ordinary course of business, and believes it has made
adequate provision for any potential estimated liabilities. The
Company does not expect the outcome of these proceedings,
individually or in the aggregate, to have a material adverse
effect on its financial position, results of operations or
liquidity.
|
|
NOTE 10. |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
The future annual payments for operating leases with terms
greater than one year, primarily for premises, automobiles and
office equipment, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises | |
|
Automobiles | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2006
|
|
$ |
6,608 |
|
|
$ |
789 |
|
|
$ |
432 |
|
|
$ |
7,829 |
|
2007
|
|
|
5,054 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
5,703 |
|
2008
|
|
|
4,131 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
4,338 |
|
2009
|
|
|
3,611 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3,637 |
|
2010
|
|
|
3,036 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,049 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
15,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,026 |
|
F-162
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
In addition to the automobile leases noted in the table above,
as at December 31, 2005, the Company leased approximately
1,233 vehicles under a master operating lease agreement, which
has a minimum lease term of 12 months. The Companys
practice is to continue these leases on a
month-to-month basis
after the expiry of the minimum lease term. Lease payments for
these vehicles are projected to be $7,310,000 in 2006.
Total expense incurred under all operating leases for the
52 weeks ended December 31, 2005, was $19,717,000
(2004 $21,739,000, 2003 $23,181,000).
|
|
|
Environmental contingencies and liabilities |
The Companys operations are subject to numerous
environmental laws, regulations and guidelines adopted by
various governmental authorities in the jurisdictions in which
the Company operates. On a continuing basis, the Companys
business practices are designed to assess and evaluate
environmental risk and, when necessary, conduct appropriate
corrective measures. Liabilities are recorded when known or
considered probable and reasonably estimable.
The Company provides for environmental liabilities using its
best estimates. Actual environmental liabilities could differ
significantly from these estimates.
The provision (recovery) for income taxes on income (loss)
from continuing operations consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended | |
|
52 Weeks Ended | |
|
53 Weeks Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
January 3, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$ |
(11,011 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,243 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,575 |
) |
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
2,083 |
|
|
|
6,597 |
|
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,045 |
) |
|
|
3,673 |
|
|
|
(4,535 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
7,535 |
|
|
|
(1,380 |
) |
|
|
(1,950 |
) |
|
Foreign
|
|
|
2,393 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
3,932 |
|
|
|
(3,715 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,860 |
|
|
|
(5,126 |
) |
|
|
(1,950 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision
|
|
$ |
4,815 |
|
|
$ |
(1,453 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,485 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of income (loss) before income taxes consist of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended | |
|
52 Weeks Ended | |
|
53 Weeks Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
January 3, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
United States
|
|
$ |
38,839 |
|
|
$ |
7,372 |
|
|
$ |
632 |
|
Foreign
|
|
|
7,425 |
|
|
|
7,011 |
|
|
|
8,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
46,264 |
|
|
$ |
14,383 |
|
|
$ |
8,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-163
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
The reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate
related to the Companys effective tax rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks | |
|
52 Weeks | |
|
53 Weeks | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
January 1, 2005 | |
|
January 3, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
U.S. Federal statutory tax rate
|
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
State and local taxes
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
(54.9 |
) |
|
|
23.7 |
|
Non-deductible or non-taxable amounts, change in valuation
allowance and other
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
(73.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
Favourable resolution of tax uncertainties
|
|
|
(31.8 |
) |
|
|
120.8 |
|
|
|
(293.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
27.7 |
% |
|
|
(235.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company made income tax payments of $5,431,000
(2004 $8,160,000, 2003 $9,920,000),
excluding income tax refunds received of $1,516,000
(2004 $1,323,000, 2003 $17,029,000),
during the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005.
F-164
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to
significant deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
$ |
6,817 |
|
|
$ |
11,297 |
|
|
Cemetery property
|
|
|
55,163 |
|
|
|
57,195 |
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
13,577 |
|
|
|
14,239 |
|
|
Pre-need funeral and cemetery obligations
|
|
|
180,801 |
|
|
|
195,749 |
|
|
Insurance policy liabilities
|
|
|
15,172 |
|
|
|
11,828 |
|
|
Covenants not to compete
|
|
|
8,057 |
|
|
|
9,814 |
|
|
Deferred agency costs
|
|
|
11,665 |
|
|
|
15,349 |
|
|
Operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
90,686 |
|
|
|
91,855 |
|
|
Capital loss carryforwards
|
|
|
235,911 |
|
|
|
234,281 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
4,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets before valuation allowance
|
|
|
618,470 |
|
|
|
646,503 |
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(401,350 |
) |
|
|
(427,364 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets after valuation allowance
|
|
|
217,120 |
|
|
|
219,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
28,115 |
|
|
|
33,374 |
|
|
Pre-need funeral receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
103,548 |
|
|
|
113,534 |
|
|
Pre-need cemetery receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
51,250 |
|
|
|
55,104 |
|
|
Insurance invested assets
|
|
|
1,304 |
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
25,771 |
|
|
|
20,203 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4,627 |
|
|
|
6,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
214,615 |
|
|
|
231,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) of continuing
operations
|
|
$ |
2,505 |
|
|
$ |
(12,196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Although realization of the Companys net deferred tax
assets is not assured, management believes that it is more
likely than not that reversals of deferred tax liabilities and
the expected profitability of the Company will provide
sufficient taxable income to realize the deferred tax assets
after consideration of the valuation allowance. It is possible
that the estimated valuation allowance could change in the near
term due to matters such as the timing and manner of reversals
of deferred tax liabilities, sales of operations and future
actual income or losses. If this occurs, any resulting increase
in the valuation allowance would generally be treated as an
additional income tax expense in the period in which it arises,
while any resulting decrease reflecting realization of the
benefits of tax assets that had a corresponding valuation
allowance established on the Effective Date would be treated as
a reduction of goodwill established on the Effective Date, with
any excess over the value assigned to such goodwill recognized
as a capital transaction.
F-165
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
As a result of the Companys emergence from reorganization
proceedings, all federal net operating loss carryforwards
generated by the Company prior to emergence and during fiscal
2002, have been eliminated. The Companys net operating
loss carryforwards pertaining to federal, state, local, and
foreign jurisdictions will expire as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of | |
|
|
Fiscal Year | |
|
|
| |
2006
|
|
$ |
5,359 |
|
2007
|
|
|
4,198 |
|
2008
|
|
|
4,907 |
|
2009
|
|
|
20,194 |
|
2010
|
|
|
4,348 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
628,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
667,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of loss carryforwards reflects the Companys
best estimate of the effects that the confirmation and
implementation of the Plan will have on the reduction and in
some cases elimination of certain net operating loss
carryforwards for income tax purposes. These amounts are subject
to final determination by taxation authorities. Further, the
Company expects its ability to utilize certain net operating
losses to offset future Company taxable income in any particular
year may be limited because distribution of the Companys
Common Stock to the Companys creditors pursuant to the
Plan resulted in an ownership change as defined in
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company
believes that uncertainty exists with respect to future
realization of the loss carryforwards and a full valuation
allowance has been established for the net operating loss
carryforwards that the Company estimates will expire unused.
Deferred tax liabilities are not recognized for basis
differences related to investments in foreign subsidiaries that
are essentially permanent in duration.
Goodwill that is expected to be deductible for tax purposes at
December 31, 2005 is $73,459,000 (2004
$89,122,000, 2003 $105,561,000).
|
|
NOTE 12. |
RETIREMENT PLANS |
The Company has a 401(K) Retirement Savings Plan for United
States employees who may defer between 1% and 75% of their
eligible compensation. The Company will match between 50% and
100% of employee contributions to a maximum of either 2% of
employees eligible compensation for certain employees or
$2,000 for others. There are no required future contributions
under this plan in respect of past service.
The Company has a Registered Retirement Savings Plan for
Canadian employees who may contribute either 3% or 5% of their
compensation which is matched by an equal contribution to the
plan by the Company on behalf of employees. There are no
required future contributions under this plan in respect of past
service.
The Companys total expense for these retirement plans for
the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005, was
approximately $2,663,000 (2004 $2,675,000,
2003 $2,650,000).
The Company has defined benefit plans for certain employees of
its Rose Hills subsidiary. The plans are frozen, and as such the
Company does not incur new service costs. The present value of
these benefits has been funded or accrued in the condensed
consolidated financial statements of the Company. At
December 31, 2005, the Company recorded total plan assets
of $11,234,200 (2004 $12,816,100) and corresponding
benefit obligation of $19,951,500 (2004 $19,709,900).
F-166
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
|
|
NOTE 13. |
SUPPLEMENTARY STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS DISCLOSURE |
Supplemental disclosures related to the statement of cash flows
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks | |
|
53 Weeks | |
|
|
52 Weeks Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
January 1, 2005 | |
|
January 3, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Decrease (increase) in assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net of allowances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
|
|
$ |
19,783 |
|
|
$ |
(2,387 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,775 |
) |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(4,766 |
) |
|
|
(5,823 |
) |
|
|
18,325 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
1,515 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
19,630 |
|
|
|
(657 |
) |
|
|
(2,283 |
) |
|
Cemetery property
|
|
|
(9,614 |
) |
|
|
(10,241 |
) |
|
|
(3,276 |
) |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(5,650 |
) |
|
|
(18,932 |
) |
|
|
(12,535 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(25,845 |
) |
|
|
(14,146 |
) |
|
|
(7,296 |
) |
|
Net effect of pre-need receivables and deferred revenue
|
|
|
8,820 |
|
|
|
35,528 |
|
|
|
52,425 |
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(2,131 |
) |
|
|
6,494 |
|
|
|
(2,760 |
) |
|
Insurance policy liabilities
|
|
|
2,452 |
|
|
|
1,831 |
|
|
|
5,811 |
|
|
Other changes in non-cash balances
|
|
|
(4,156 |
) |
|
|
(3,157 |
) |
|
|
7,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(540 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,653 |
) |
|
$ |
51,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$ |
29,443 |
|
|
$ |
53,918 |
|
|
$ |
77,290 |
|
|
Income taxes paid, net of refunds
|
|
|
3,915 |
|
|
|
6,837 |
|
|
|
(7,109 |
) |
|
Long-term debt issue costs paid
|
|
|
965 |
|
|
|
12,094 |
|
|
|
10,908 |
|
|
Bad debt expense
|
|
|
3,211 |
|
|
|
3,722 |
|
|
|
3,661 |
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued in connection with the settlement of certain
unsecured claims
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
Stock issued as compensation in lieu of cash
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
Capital leases entered into
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
Restricted cash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of funeral, cemetery, and perpetual care trust
investments
|
|
$ |
539,161 |
|
|
$ |
356,254 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds on disposition and maturities of funeral, and cemetery,
and perpetual care trust investments
|
|
|
490,658 |
|
|
|
375,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in non-controlling interests in funeral, cemetery and
perpetual care trusts
|
|
|
59,763 |
|
|
|
50,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in non-controlling interests in funeral, cemetery and
perpetual care trusts
|
|
|
110,782 |
|
|
|
81,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-167
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
|
|
NOTE 14. |
SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
A summary of certain balance sheet accounts is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Receivables, net of allowances:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer receivables
|
|
$ |
50,459 |
|
|
$ |
68,721 |
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(10,320 |
) |
|
|
(12,029 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
12,723 |
|
|
|
9,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
52,862 |
|
|
$ |
66,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery property:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed land and lawn crypts
|
|
$ |
38,368 |
|
|
$ |
37,623 |
|
|
Undeveloped land
|
|
|
31,243 |
|
|
|
30,685 |
|
|
Mausoleums
|
|
|
46,856 |
|
|
|
50,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
116,467 |
|
|
$ |
119,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$ |
162,287 |
|
|
$ |
166,252 |
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
386,068 |
|
|
|
368,501 |
|
|
Automobiles
|
|
|
10,652 |
|
|
|
13,013 |
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
69,570 |
|
|
|
54,432 |
|
|
Computer hardware and software
|
|
|
29,061 |
|
|
|
23,311 |
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(114,737 |
) |
|
|
(85,254 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
542,901 |
|
|
$ |
540,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
$ |
18,741 |
|
|
$ |
15,060 |
|
|
Deferred finance costs
|
|
|
23,359 |
|
|
|
22,411 |
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(15,258 |
) |
|
|
(12,222 |
) |
|
Notes receivable
|
|
|
3,016 |
|
|
|
2,696 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
12,992 |
|
|
|
9,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
42,850 |
|
|
$ |
37,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank overdraft.
|
|
$ |
7,191 |
|
|
$ |
7,209 |
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
13,634 |
|
|
|
19,847 |
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
5,169 |
|
|
|
7,210 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
21,629 |
|
|
|
32,423 |
|
|
Accrued insurance
|
|
|
21,261 |
|
|
|
18,058 |
|
|
Accrued taxes
|
|
|
32,199 |
|
|
|
44,785 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
18,651 |
|
|
|
11,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
119,734 |
|
|
$ |
140,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-168
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Deferred pre-need contract revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
$ |
72,087 |
|
|
$ |
69,098 |
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
19,531 |
|
|
|
13,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
91,618 |
|
|
$ |
82,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perpetual care liability
|
|
$ |
7,860 |
|
|
$ |
7,490 |
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
12,104 |
|
|
|
12,667 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,019 |
|
|
|
1,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,983 |
|
|
$ |
21,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended | |
|
52 Weeks Ended | |
|
53 Weeks Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
January 1, 2005 | |
|
January 3, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Other expense (income), net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For funeral, cemetery and perpetual care trust investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gains
|
|
$ |
(14,715 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,748 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
Realized losses
|
|
|
9,660 |
|
|
|
10,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
|
(26,707 |
) |
|
|
(24,915 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust investment expenses and income taxes
|
|
|
5,036 |
|
|
|
5,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense related to non-controlling interest in funeral
and cemetery trusts
|
|
|
15,803 |
|
|
|
18,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts
|
|
|
10,923 |
|
|
|
7,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on disposal of business and other assets
|
|
|
(4,964 |
) |
|
|
(3,529 |
) |
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
2,367 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(4,662 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,162 |
) |
|
$ |
4,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The trust investment and non-controlling interest balances do
not have comparable 2003 balances due to the Company adopting
FIN No. 46R at the beginning of its 2004 fiscal year
on January 4, 2004.
FAS No. 142 requires that goodwill be reviewed for
impairment annually, as well as upon the occurrence of certain
events that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of
a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Under
FAS No. 142, goodwill impairment is deemed to exist,
and must then be further assessed, if a reporting units
carrying amount exceeds its estimated fair value. The
Companys reporting units are funeral, cemetery and
insurance, which are consistent with the Companys
operating segments. All of the Companys goodwill is
recorded in the funeral reporting unit. In accordance with
FAS No. 142, the Company undertook its annual goodwill
impairment review during the third fiscal quarters of 2005, 2004
and 2003, and, as a result, there was no indication of goodwill
impairment as at October 8, 2005, October 9, 2004 or
October 4, 2003, as the estimated fair value of the funeral
reporting
F-169
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
unit exceeded its carrying amount. The fair value of the funeral
reporting unit was determined by using a discounted cash flow
valuation methodology consistent with that applied at the
Effective Date, with a discount rate comparable with other
enterprises in the death care industry, adjusted for risks
associated with differences in company size, certain
characteristics specific to the Company and cash flow projection
risk.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the funeral
reporting unit are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended | |
|
52 Weeks Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
January 1, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
$ |
321,134 |
|
|
$ |
320,640 |
|
Reduction in valuation allowance against deferred tax assets
established at time of emergence from reorganization proceedings
|
|
|
(19,535 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Reduction in deferred tax liability established at time of
emergence from reorganization proceedings
|
|
|
(5,683 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency and other
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
$ |
295,890 |
|
|
$ |
321,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year, the Company recorded a reduction of
$33.9 million in the valuation allowance on the
Companys deferred tax assets established at time of
emergence from reorganization proceedings, as it was determined
that it is more likely than not that a portion of the deferred
tax assets will be realized. In accordance with
SFAS No. 109 Accounting for Income Taxes
and SOP 90-7
Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization under
Bankruptcy Code, $19.5 million of the reversal was
applied against goodwill recorded at the time of Companys
emergence from reorganization proceedings (see Note 2). The
remaining $14.4 million of the reversal was recorded as a
tax benefit during the year.
At emergence from reorganization proceedings, the Company
recorded deferred income tax liabilities based on estimating
temporary differences from differing treatment of items for tax
and accounting purposes. During the 52 weeks ended
December 31, 2005, the Company reduced this estimate by
$5.7 million and recorded an offsetting reduction to
goodwill.
|
|
NOTE 16. |
SEGMENT REPORTING |
The Companys reportable segments are comprised of the
three businesses it operates, each of which offers different
products and services: funeral homes, cemeteries and insurance
(see Note 1).
F-170
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
The Company sells primarily to external customers, though any
inter-segment sales or transfers occur at market price. The
Company evaluates performance based on income from operations of
the respective businesses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral | |
|
Cemetery | |
|
Insurance | |
|
Other | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenue earned from external sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 weeks ended December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
479,799 |
|
|
$ |
174,110 |
|
|
$ |
95,005 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
748,914 |
|
|
52 weeks ended January 1, 2005
|
|
$ |
472,935 |
|
|
$ |
164,052 |
|
|
$ |
80,124 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
717,111 |
|
|
53 weeks ended January 3, 2004
|
|
$ |
491,611 |
|
|
$ |
168,024 |
|
|
$ |
61,127 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
720,762 |
|
Income from operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 weeks ended December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
87,280 |
|
|
$ |
23,550 |
|
|
$ |
5,068 |
|
|
$ |
(42,815 |
) |
|
$ |
73,083 |
|
|
52 weeks ended January 1, 2005
|
|
$ |
94,640 |
|
|
$ |
23,768 |
|
|
$ |
4,710 |
|
|
$ |
(51,218 |
) |
|
$ |
71,900 |
|
|
53 weeks ended January 3, 2004
|
|
$ |
110,529 |
|
|
$ |
26,383 |
|
|
$ |
1,752 |
|
|
$ |
(56,281 |
) |
|
$ |
82,383 |
|
Depreciation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 weeks ended December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
24,864 |
|
|
$ |
14,827 |
|
|
$ |
148 |
|
|
$ |
4,759 |
|
|
$ |
44,598 |
|
|
52 weeks ended January 1, 2005
|
|
$ |
24,283 |
|
|
$ |
14,062 |
|
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
$ |
3,582 |
|
|
$ |
42,093 |
|
|
53 weeks ended January 3, 2004
|
|
$ |
24,194 |
|
|
$ |
13,364 |
|
|
$ |
139 |
|
|
$ |
2,525 |
|
|
$ |
40,222 |
|
Total assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
1,107,916 |
|
|
$ |
807,673 |
|
|
$ |
326,160 |
|
|
$ |
32,554 |
|
|
$ |
2,274,303 |
|
|
January 1, 2005
|
|
$ |
1,154,019 |
|
|
$ |
878,350 |
|
|
$ |
272,823 |
|
|
$ |
67,235 |
|
|
$ |
2,372,427 |
|
|
January 3, 2004
|
|
$ |
1,218,974 |
|
|
$ |
668,357 |
|
|
$ |
481,622 |
|
|
$ |
84,050 |
|
|
$ |
2,453,003 |
|
Goodwill:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
295,890 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
295,890 |
|
|
January 1, 2005
|
|
$ |
321,134 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
321,134 |
|
Purchase of property and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 weeks ended December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
25,715 |
|
|
$ |
5,477 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
$ |
11,213 |
|
|
$ |
42,510 |
|
|
52 weeks ended January 1, 2005
|
|
$ |
23,273 |
|
|
$ |
3,362 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
$ |
10,474 |
|
|
$ |
37,183 |
|
|
53 weeks ended January 3, 2004
|
|
$ |
18,640 |
|
|
$ |
2,292 |
|
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
$ |
4,087 |
|
|
$ |
25,202 |
|
Development of cemetery property:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 weeks ended December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,178 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,178 |
|
|
52 weeks ended January 1, 2005
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,100 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,100 |
|
|
53 weeks ended January 3, 2004
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,122 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,122 |
|
The following table reconciles earnings from operations of
reportable segments to total earnings and identifies the
components of Other segment earnings from operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended | |
|
52 Weeks Ended | |
|
53 Weeks Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
January 1, 2005 | |
|
January 3, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Earnings from operations of funeral, cemetery and insurance
segments
|
|
$ |
115,898 |
|
|
$ |
123,118 |
|
|
$ |
138,664 |
|
Other expenses of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(42,815 |
) |
|
|
(51,218 |
) |
|
|
(56,281 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
$ |
73,083 |
|
|
$ |
71,900 |
|
|
$ |
82,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-171
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
The following table reconciles total assets of reportable
segments and details the components of Other segment
assets, which is mainly comprised of corporate assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
January 1, 2005 | |
|
January 3, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total assets of funeral, cemetery and insurance segments
|
|
$ |
2,241,749 |
|
|
$ |
2,305,191 |
|
|
$ |
2,368,953 |
|
Other assets includes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
2,039 |
|
|
|
30,911 |
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
7,188 |
|
|
|
5,294 |
|
|
|
5,116 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
5,604 |
|
|
|
24,572 |
|
|
|
23,736 |
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
23,345 |
|
|
|
16,494 |
|
|
|
9,186 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(4,340 |
) |
|
|
18,837 |
|
|
|
15,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,274,303 |
|
|
$ |
2,372,427 |
|
|
$ |
2,453,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company operates principally in the United States and also
has operations in Canada. The Companys United Kingdom
operations are classified as discontinued operations and were
disposed of on October 20, 2003. The following tables
depict the revenue earned and the long-lived assets held in the
reportable geographic segments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended | |
|
52 Weeks Ended | |
|
53 Weeks Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
January 1, 2005 | |
|
January 3, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$ |
685,429 |
|
|
$ |
660,470 |
|
|
$ |
665,488 |
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
63,485 |
|
|
|
56,641 |
|
|
|
55,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
748,914 |
|
|
$ |
717,111 |
|
|
$ |
720,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
January 3, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Property and equipment and cemetery property:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$ |
564,303 |
|
|
$ |
573,280 |
|
|
$ |
592,057 |
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
95,065 |
|
|
|
86,017 |
|
|
|
74,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
659,368 |
|
|
$ |
659,297 |
|
|
$ |
666,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-172
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
|
|
NOTE 17. |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING GUARANTOR FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
The following presents the condensed consolidating guarantor
financial information as of the 52 weeks ended
December 31, 2005 and the 52 weeks ended
January 1, 2005 and for the 52 weeks ended
December 31, 2005, the 52 weeks ended January 1,
2005 and the 53 weeks ended January 3, 2004 for the
direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries of the Company that
serve as guarantors of the 7.75% senior unsecured notes due
in 2012, and the Companys subsidiaries that do not serve
as guarantors. Non-guarantor subsidiaries include the Canadian
and Puerto Rican subsidiaries, insurance subsidiary and certain
domestic subsidiaries that are prohibited by law from
guaranteeing the 7.75% senior unsecured notes due in 2012.
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Parent | |
|
|
|
Non- | |
|
Consolidating | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Company | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS |
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,034 |
|
|
$ |
3,421 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,455 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
1,964 |
|
|
|
60,070 |
|
|
|
13,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,531 |
|
|
Pre-need funeral receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,915 |
|
|
|
285,617 |
|
|
|
(212,105 |
) |
|
|
334,427 |
|
|
Pre-need cemetery receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287,522 |
|
|
|
273,732 |
|
|
|
(253,932 |
) |
|
|
307,322 |
|
|
Cemetery property and property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
549,860 |
|
|
|
109,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
659,368 |
|
|
Insurance invested assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,598 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,160 |
|
|
|
48,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295,890 |
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
|
1,075,366 |
|
|
|
(91,898 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(983,468 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
243,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,805 |
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
8,101 |
|
|
|
17,367 |
|
|
|
30,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
1,085,431 |
|
|
$ |
1,335,494 |
|
|
$ |
1,302,883 |
|
|
$ |
(1,449,505 |
) |
|
$ |
2,274,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$ |
39,333 |
|
|
$ |
73,597 |
|
|
$ |
6,804 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
119,734 |
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,412 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,435 |
|
|
Intercompany, net of investments in and advances to affiliates
|
|
|
82,643 |
|
|
|
(260,549 |
) |
|
|
177,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
365,683 |
|
|
|
5,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
371,040 |
|
|
Deferred pre-need funeral and cemetery contract revenue and
non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
533,061 |
|
|
|
573,091 |
|
|
|
(466,037 |
) |
|
|
640,115 |
|
|
Insurance policy liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266,729 |
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
20,040 |
|
|
|
12,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,535 |
|
Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,962 |
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
597,753 |
|
|
|
961,576 |
|
|
|
21,892 |
|
|
|
(983,468 |
) |
|
|
597,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
1,085,431 |
|
|
$ |
1,335,494 |
|
|
$ |
1,302,883 |
|
|
$ |
(1,449,505 |
) |
|
$ |
2,274,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-173
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Parent | |
|
|
|
Non- | |
|
Consolidating | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Company | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS |
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,385 |
|
|
$ |
2,994 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,379 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,759 |
|
|
|
12,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,797 |
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,695 |
|
|
|
72,649 |
|
|
|
(22,288 |
) |
|
|
82,056 |
|
|
Pre-need funeral receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261,568 |
|
|
|
292,069 |
|
|
|
(217,607 |
) |
|
|
336,030 |
|
|
Pre-need cemetery receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
283,435 |
|
|
|
271,003 |
|
|
|
(242,784 |
) |
|
|
311,654 |
|
|
Cemetery property and property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
557,671 |
|
|
|
101,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
659,297 |
|
|
Insurance invested assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,785 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
274,691 |
|
|
|
46,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
321,134 |
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
|
995,959 |
|
|
|
(93,014 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(902,945 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
827 |
|
|
|
245,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246,052 |
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
10,339 |
|
|
|
15,926 |
|
|
|
18,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
1,006,298 |
|
|
$ |
1,437,943 |
|
|
$ |
1,313,810 |
|
|
$ |
(1,385,624 |
) |
|
$ |
2,372,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$ |
42,827 |
|
|
$ |
84,062 |
|
|
$ |
13,773 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
140,662 |
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
4,509 |
|
|
|
2,838 |
|
|
|
1,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,083 |
|
|
|
Intercompany, net of investments in and advances to affiliates
|
|
|
(43,792 |
) |
|
|
(131,602 |
) |
|
|
175,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities associated with assets held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,515 |
|
|
|
59,201 |
|
|
|
(22,288 |
) |
|
|
61,428 |
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
446,826 |
|
|
|
7,708 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
454,557 |
|
|
|
Deferred pre-need funeral and cemetery contract revenue and
non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
521,111 |
|
|
|
575,868 |
|
|
|
(460,391 |
) |
|
|
636,588 |
|
|
|
Insurance policy liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214,745 |
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
29,410 |
|
|
|
12,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,311 |
|
|
Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
257,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
257,141 |
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
555,912 |
|
|
|
899,901 |
|
|
|
3,044 |
|
|
|
(902,945 |
) |
|
|
555,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
1,006,298 |
|
|
$ |
1,437,943 |
|
|
$ |
1,313,810 |
|
|
$ |
(1,385,624 |
) |
|
$ |
2,372,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-174
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent | |
|
|
|
Non- | |
|
Consolidating | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Company | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
565,211 |
|
|
$ |
183,703 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
748,914 |
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
470,250 |
|
|
|
164,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
634,395 |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(1,996 |
) |
|
|
(13,985 |
) |
|
|
58,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,815 |
|
Provision for asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,008 |
) |
|
|
(371 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,379 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
1,996 |
|
|
|
109,954 |
|
|
|
(38,867 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,083 |
|
Interest on long-term debt
|
|
|
29,510 |
|
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,069 |
|
Intercompany charges
|
|
|
16,286 |
|
|
|
32,039 |
|
|
|
(48,325 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense (income), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,480 |
) |
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,662 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(43,800 |
) |
|
|
82,707 |
|
|
|
8,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,676 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(3,246 |
) |
|
|
16,088 |
|
|
|
(8,027 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(40,554 |
) |
|
|
66,619 |
|
|
|
16,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in subsidiaries
|
|
|
81,737 |
|
|
|
(2,210 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79,527 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,247 |
) |
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,412 |
) |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,245 |
) |
|
|
(433 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
41,183 |
|
|
$ |
63,164 |
|
|
$ |
16,363 |
|
|
$ |
(79,527 |
) |
|
$ |
41,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-175
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended January 1, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Parent | |
|
|
|
Non- | |
|
Consolidating | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Company | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
554,520 |
|
|
$ |
162,591 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
717,111 |
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
449,833 |
|
|
|
142,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
592,206 |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(362 |
) |
|
|
2,592 |
|
|
|
48,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,218 |
|
Provision for asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,283 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
100,812 |
|
|
|
(29,274 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,900 |
|
Interest on long-term debt
|
|
|
80,264 |
|
|
|
1,222 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
(3,630 |
) |
|
|
78,079 |
|
Intercompany charges
|
|
|
11,321 |
|
|
|
22,909 |
|
|
|
(34,230 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense (income), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,565 |
) |
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,162 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(91,223 |
) |
|
|
78,246 |
|
|
|
4,330 |
|
|
|
3,630 |
|
|
|
(5,017 |
) |
Income taxes
|
|
|
(5,848 |
) |
|
|
2,345 |
|
|
|
2,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,453 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(85,375 |
) |
|
|
75,901 |
|
|
|
2,280 |
|
|
|
3,630 |
|
|
|
(3,564 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in subsidiaries
|
|
|
94,724 |
|
|
|
(4,116 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90,608 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
22,689 |
|
|
|
(3,630 |
) |
|
|
19,400 |
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
16,202 |
|
|
|
(3,630 |
) |
|
|
12,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
9,349 |
|
|
$ |
72,126 |
|
|
$ |
18,482 |
|
|
$ |
(90,608 |
) |
|
$ |
9,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-176
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 Weeks Ended January 3, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Parent | |
|
|
|
Non- | |
|
Consolidating | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Company | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
575,817 |
|
|
$ |
144,945 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
720,762 |
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
450,859 |
|
|
|
126,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
576,869 |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(2,789 |
) |
|
|
12,180 |
|
|
|
46,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,281 |
|
Provision for asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,383 |
|
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
2,789 |
|
|
|
107,395 |
|
|
|
(27,801 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,383 |
|
Interest on long-term debt
|
|
|
65,051 |
|
|
|
11,499 |
|
|
|
1,281 |
|
|
|
(1,378 |
) |
|
|
76,453 |
|
Intercompany charges
|
|
|
20,308 |
|
|
|
(71,062 |
) |
|
|
50,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense (income), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,995 |
|
|
|
2,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(82,570 |
) |
|
|
164,963 |
|
|
|
(81,897 |
) |
|
|
1,378 |
|
|
|
1,874 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(8,162 |
) |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
1,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,485 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(74,408 |
) |
|
|
164,784 |
|
|
|
(83,395 |
) |
|
|
1,378 |
|
|
|
8,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in subsidiaries
|
|
|
85,215 |
|
|
|
905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(86,120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,300 |
) |
|
|
19,548 |
|
|
|
(1,378 |
) |
|
|
6,870 |
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,300 |
) |
|
|
15,126 |
|
|
|
(1,378 |
) |
|
|
2,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
10,807 |
|
|
$ |
154,389 |
|
|
$ |
(68,269 |
) |
|
$ |
(86,120 |
) |
|
$ |
10,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-177
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Parent | |
|
|
|
Non- | |
|
Consolidating |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Company | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Adjustments |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
CASH PROVIDED BY (APPLIED TO)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations
|
|
$ |
83,157 |
|
|
$ |
148 |
|
|
$ |
64,129 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
147,434 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
(1,396 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(601 |
) |
Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,587 |
) |
|
|
(62,366 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68,953 |
) |
Cash flows from investing activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,128 |
|
|
|
1,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,908 |
|
Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
(83,157 |
) |
|
|
(2,826 |
) |
|
|
(1,672 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(87,655 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,351 |
) |
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,924 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,385 |
|
|
|
2,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,034 |
|
|
$ |
3,421 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended January 1, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Parent | |
|
|
|
Non- | |
|
Consolidating | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Company | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
CASH PROVIDED BY (APPLIED TO)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations
|
|
$ |
116,629 |
|
|
$ |
(57,133 |
) |
|
$ |
41,154 |
|
|
$ |
3,630 |
|
|
$ |
104,280 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,975 |
|
|
|
5,943 |
|
|
|
(7,609 |
) |
|
|
15,309 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
(4,088 |
) |
|
|
(63,761 |
) |
|
|
(65,000 |
) |
|
|
(67,849 |
) |
Cash flows from investing activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,070 |
|
|
|
79,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,975 |
|
Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
(181,629 |
) |
|
|
(14,355 |
) |
|
|
(65,503 |
) |
|
|
68,979 |
|
|
|
(192,508 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(351 |
) |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(440 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,882 |
) |
|
|
(2,351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,233 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,267 |
|
|
|
5,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,385 |
|
|
$ |
2,994 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-178
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 Weeks Ended January 3, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Parent | |
|
|
|
Non- | |
|
Consolidating | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Company | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
CASH PROVIDED BY (APPLIED TO)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations
|
|
$ |
(19,653 |
) |
|
$ |
142,116 |
|
|
$ |
13,355 |
|
|
$ |
1,378 |
|
|
$ |
137,196 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,354 |
|
|
|
10,910 |
|
|
|
(1,685 |
) |
|
|
18,579 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
(11,428 |
) |
|
|
(41,995 |
) |
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
(53,423 |
) |
Cash flows from investing activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,255 |
|
|
|
15,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,710 |
|
Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
9,653 |
|
|
|
(147,911 |
) |
|
|
(434 |
) |
|
|
10,307 |
|
|
|
(128,385 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
(1,972 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,177 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
(4,681 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,500 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,089 |
|
|
|
10,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
36,270 |
|
|
$ |
5,342 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
41,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 18. |
PROVISION FOR ASSET IMPAIRMENT |
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets (FAS No. 144), the
Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment when
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
the asset may not be recoverable. FAS No. 144 requires
that long-lived assets to be held and used be recorded at the
lower of carrying amount or fair value. Long-lived assets to be
disposed of are to be recorded at the lower of carrying amount
or fair value, less estimated cost to sell.
Previously, the Company designated certain parcels of surplus
real estate as held for sale, as they do not meet the
Companys future geographic and strategic objectives.
During the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005, the
Company determined that the carrying amounts of certain parcels
of the surplus real estate now exceeded the fair market value,
less estimated cost to sell. Accordingly, the Company has
recorded a long-lived asset impairment recovery of $1,379,000
for the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005 (2004 charge
of $1,922,000, 2003 charge of $4,395,000).
As of December 31, 2005, in conjunction with the
Companys ongoing assessment to ensure that each of the
Companys properties fit into the Companys strategy,
the Company held two funeral home operations and one cemetery
operation for sale. The carrying amount of these locations was
$341,000. The fair market values were determined by specific
offers or bids, or estimates based on comparable recent sales
transactions. As the fair value exceeded the carrying value of
these locations no long-lived asset impairment was recorded in
2005. For the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005, these
properties had funeral home revenues and costs of $392,000 and
$533,000 (2004 $563,000 and $410,000;
2003 $779,000 and $800,000), respectively.
F-179
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
The assets of $3,121,200 (January 1, 2005
$3,275,700) and liabilities of $1,857,700 (January 1,
2005 $1,953,500) of these locations are classified
according to their nature in the consolidated balance sheets
and, on the basis of immateriality have not been identified
separately as to assets held for sale and liabilities associated
with assets held for sale in the balance sheet.
In addition, for the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005,
the total revenues and costs of disposed funeral home locations
which were not reclassified to discontinued operations were
$3,274,000 and $3,120,300 (2004 $5,341,700 and
$4,740,300; 2003 $6,209,500 and $4,865,300),
respectively.
The fair market value was determined by specific offer or bid,
or an estimate based on comparable recent sales transactions.
The asset impairment provisions include management estimates. As
a result, actual results could differ significantly from these
estimates.
|
|
NOTE 19. |
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS OF ASSETS HELD FOR SALE |
Over the previous three fiscal years, the Company engaged in a
strategic market rationalization assessment to dispose of
cemetery and funeral operating locations that did not fit into
the Companys market or business strategies, as well as
under-performing locations and excess cemetery land. The Company
will on a smaller scale and over time, continue to assess the
Companys portfolio of funeral and cemetery locations to
ensure they continue to fit in the Companys strategy. Once
a property is added to the disposal list, the Company expects to
complete the sale within one year. As of January 1, 2005,
the Company had 18 funeral, six cemetery and four combination
locations which have not been sold within one year of being
added to the disposal list. The Company completed the sale of
all these locations during 2005, except for one cemetery which
was reclassified back to continuing operations. As a result the
Company has reclassified the prior fiscal years to reflect any
comparative amounts on a similar basis.
During 2003, the Company identified Security Plan Life Insurance
Company, its wholly-owned home service insurance company, as a
non-strategic asset, because it was not part of the
Companys pre-need funeral sales efforts. The
Companys continuing wholly-owned pre-need life insurance
company is Mayflower National Life Insurance Company. On
June 17, 2004, the Company announced the signing of an
agreement by its subsidiary, Mayflower National Life Insurance
Company, to sell all the outstanding shares of Security Plan
Life Insurance Company for $85,000,000. The sale concluded on
October 1, 2004. After payment of applicable taxes and
expenses, and the recapitalization of Mayflower National Life
Insurance Company, the Company utilized $65,000,000 of the
proceeds to reduce long-term debt. The Company recorded a
pre-tax gain on the sale of $16,011,000.
The Company has classified all the locations identified for
disposal as assets held for sale in the consolidated balance
sheets and recorded any related operating results, long-lived
asset impairment provisions, and gains or losses recorded on
disposition as income from discontinued operations. The Company
has also reclassified the prior fiscal years to reflect any
comparative amounts on a similar basis. All discontinued
operations financial information presented under the insurance
segment relate to Security Plan Life Insurance Company.
Discontinued operations consists of long-lived asset impairment
provisions, gains and losses recorded on disposition, and
operating results of the locations. FAS No. 144
requires that long-lived assets to be disposed of are to be
recorded at the lower of carrying amount or fair market value,
less estimated costs to sell. Depreciation and amortization is
not recorded once an asset has been identified as held for sale.
The fair market value was determined by specific offer or bid,
or an estimate based on comparable recent sales transactions.
Impairment provisions on assets previously identified as held
for sale resulted from changes in previously estimated proceeds,
net asset values and closing costs. The long-lived asset
impairment
F-180
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
provisions are based on management estimates. As a result,
actual results could differ significantly from these estimates.
The Companys debt agreements require sale proceeds (above
specified limits) from assets held for sale to be applied
towards the repayment of debt. During 2004 and 2003, the Company
used such proceeds to pay down the Term Loan B.
Accordingly, interest expense for discontinued operations was
calculated by applying the applicable interest rates during the
periods in which the repayment conditions were in effect to both
the amounts of principal repaid and to the expected proceeds of
assets remaining to be sold as of December 31, 2005.
Certain comparative amounts have been reclassified to conform to
the presentation adopted in the current year.
The carrying amount, the fair market value, less estimated costs
to sell, revenues and costs and impairment provisions for the
locations identified as held for sale are presented in the
following tables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks | |
|
52 Weeks | |
|
53 Weeks | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
January 3, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
$ |
1,853 |
|
|
$ |
19,829 |
|
|
$ |
43,917 |
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
14,303 |
|
|
|
26,579 |
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,720 |
|
|
|
54,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,451 |
|
|
$ |
75,852 |
|
|
|
125,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
$ |
(152 |
) |
|
$ |
874 |
|
|
$ |
4,512 |
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,382 |
|
|
|
12,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(389 |
) |
|
|
10,928 |
|
|
|
18,534 |
|
Long-lived asset impairment on assets identified as held for sale
|
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
15,361 |
|
|
|
20,179 |
|
Other expense (income), net
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
(27,505 |
) |
|
|
(10,050 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(1,412 |
) |
|
|
23,072 |
|
|
|
8,405 |
|
Interest on long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,672 |
|
|
|
1,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, before tax
|
|
|
(1,412 |
) |
|
|
19,400 |
|
|
|
6,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision for discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
4,730 |
|
|
|
1,322 |
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,757 |
|
|
|
3,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
6,487 |
|
|
|
4,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
$ |
(1,678 |
) |
|
$ |
12,913 |
|
|
$ |
2,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation included in gross margin of discontinued operations
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
626 |
|
|
$ |
2,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-181
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
Details of assets held for sale at January 1, 2005, are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral | |
|
Cemetery | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$ |
2,141 |
|
|
$ |
215 |
|
|
$ |
2,356 |
|
|
Pre-need receivables and investments
|
|
|
21,818 |
|
|
|
33,790 |
|
|
|
55,608 |
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
11,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,110 |
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
12,773 |
|
|
|
12,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
35,278 |
|
|
$ |
46,778 |
|
|
$ |
82,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities associated with assets held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
$ |
327 |
|
|
Deferred pre-need contract revenue
|
|
|
1,971 |
|
|
|
3,691 |
|
|
|
5,662 |
|
|
Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts
|
|
|
20,034 |
|
|
|
34,306 |
|
|
|
54,340 |
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22,484 |
|
|
$ |
38,944 |
|
|
$ |
61,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11,819 |
|
|
$ |
11,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 20. |
INCOME PER SHARE |
The basic and diluted income per share computations for net
income were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks | |
|
52 Weeks | |
|
53 Weeks | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
January 3, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Income (numerator):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Common stockholders
|
|
$ |
41,183 |
|
|
$ |
9,349 |
|
|
$ |
10,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (denominator):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of shares of Common stock
outstanding (thousands)
|
|
|
40,245 |
|
|
|
40,001 |
|
|
|
39,971 |
|
|
Effect of stock options assumed exercised
|
|
|
1,357 |
|
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of shares of Common stock
outstanding (thousands)
|
|
|
41,602 |
|
|
|
41,132 |
|
|
|
40,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005, 1,357,000
employee and director stock options were dilutive to earnings
and are included in the calculation of diluted income per share.
Employee and director stock options to
purchase 1,028,000 shares of Common Stock, warrants to
purchase 2,992,000 shares of Common Stock and
236,800 shares of restricted Common Stock units were not
included in the computation of diluted loss per share, because
they were anti-dilutive.
|
|
NOTE 21. |
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS |
As of December 31, 2005, the fair value of all of the
Companys derivatives under the Foreign Currency Hedge
Program was an unrealized gain of $941,000 (2004
$2,087,000), which is included in other current assets in the
Companys consolidated balance sheet. The Effective Portion
is $863,000
F-182
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
(2004 $1,919,000) and is included in accumulated
other comprehensive income in the Companys consolidated
balance sheet. The Ineffective Portion is $89,900 and is
included in general and administrative expenses for the
52 weeks ended December 31, 2005 (2004
$168,000, 2003 $48,000). Included in general and
administrative expenses for the 52 weeks ended
December 31, 2005, was a net gain of $1,816,000
(2004 $639,000, 2003 $nil) of which
$1,749,000 (2004 $341,000, 2003 $nil)
was the Effective Portion and $67,000 (2004
$298,000, 2003 $nil) was the Ineffective Portion.
The Company uses the cumulative dollar offset method to measure
hedge effectiveness. As of December 31, 2005, a portion of
the Companys Foreign Currency Expenditure from the period
January 2, 2005, to March 2007, was hedged. As of
December 31, 2005, the Company estimates that based on
current exchange rates and maturity dates of the Companys
derivatives, $836,800 would be expected to be reclassified from
accumulated other comprehensive income to current earnings and
included in general and administrative expenses over the next
12 months.
|
|
NOTE 22. |
EFFECT OF HURRICANE KATRINA |
During the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005, some of
the Companys operations were affected by Hurricane
Katrina. The Company operated 30 funeral homes, four cemeteries
and a limousine company in these areas of Louisiana and
Mississippi that were affected by the hurricane on
August 29, 2005. The Company has experienced some damage at
all of these locations. Repair work has begun at many of the
locations. Of the 30 funeral homes, seven experienced
significant damage, were not in operation at the end of the 2005
fiscal year and are not expected to reopen. All four cemeteries
are in operation. The New Orleans limousine company that had
provided services both to the Companys funeral operations
and other third-parties experienced significant damage to its
fleet of vehicles and will not be resuming operations.
The Company is making every effort to use its existing operating
facilities to provide services to customers normally served by
one of the Companys closed locations.
The Companys insurance subsidiary is also headquartered in
New Orleans and although forced to relocate temporarily to
Cincinnati, has resumed operations from New Orleans. The
temporary relocation did not significantly affect the
Companys operating results.
F-183
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
The Companys financial results include the results from
operations for those locations affected by Hurricane Katrina as
outlined in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks | |
|
52 Weeks | |
|
53 Weeks | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
January 3, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Funeral Homes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$ |
29,460 |
|
|
$ |
29,728 |
|
|
$ |
29,813 |
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
24,175 |
|
|
|
24,530 |
|
|
|
24,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin
|
|
$ |
5,285 |
|
|
$ |
5,198 |
|
|
$ |
4,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of funeral services performed
|
|
|
6,389 |
|
|
|
6,371 |
|
|
|
6,687 |
|
|
Number of same-site funeral services performed
|
|
|
5,665 |
|
|
|
5,110 |
|
|
|
5,405 |
|
|
Pre-need funeral contracts written
|
|
$ |
9,871 |
|
|
$ |
11,982 |
|
|
$ |
12,081 |
|
Cemeteries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$ |
2,953 |
|
|
$ |
3,275 |
|
|
$ |
4,134 |
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
2,835 |
|
|
|
2,869 |
|
|
|
2,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin
|
|
$ |
118 |
|
|
$ |
406 |
|
|
$ |
1,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of cemetery interments
|
|
|
1,041 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
931 |
|
|
Pre-need cemetery contracts written
|
|
$ |
1,262 |
|
|
$ |
1,300 |
|
|
$ |
1,455 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance coverage and long-term asset gain or loss |
The Company purchases insurance coverage for property damage,
including damage from wind and flood, subject to separate
limits, sub-limits and deductible amounts. The Company, along
with its insurance companies, is continuing to assess and
estimate the extent of damages. Based on a review of the
Companys insurance policy, the Company expects to recover
a substantial portion of the costs associated with the storm
damage through insurance, including the capital costs of
rebuilding. For those properties not in operation and requiring
significant repair or rebuilding, insurance proceeds have not
yet been fully estimated and as a result, any estimated loss or
gain for these properties cannot be determined. The net book
value of buildings and contents for those locations not in
operation aggregates approximately $4.3 million at
December 31, 2005.
The Company has recorded an expense of $1.8 million in the
52 weeks ended December 31, 2005, representing its
expected deductible under its insurance policies and other
expenses not expected to be reimbursed under the insurance
policy. Under its internal risk sharing practice, the
Companys aggregate deductible costs are charged to all its
operations, not just the locations affected by Hurricane
Katrina. The effect on funeral and cemetery costs for the
52 weeks ended December 31, 2005 was $1.3 million
and $0.5 million respectively.
The Company received in 2005, $4.1 million as an advance
payment from its insurance companies for claims submitted. This
has not been recorded as income but as insurance proceeds to be
applied against incurred and anticipated repair and rebuilding
costs.
The Company is self-insured for physical damage to its owned and
leased automobiles and charges the aggregate resulting costs to
all of its operations. Hurricane Katrina resulted in estimated
damages
F-184
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of dollars except per
share amounts)
across our vehicles aggregating $0.6 million. The effect of
Hurricane Katrina vehicle damage on funeral and cemetery costs
for the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2005 was
$0.5 million and $0.1 million respectively.
The Company has business interruption insurance that allows the
recovery of operating costs and lost profits. The Company is
preparing its analysis in support of a claim. Potential proceeds
from this claim cannot currently be reasonably estimated and
therefore no receivable or recovery has been recorded as of
December 31, 2005.
|
|
NOTE 23. |
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED) |
Certain of the Companys quarterly financial data in the
table below have been adjusted from the Companys 2005 and
2004 quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q, due to
the reclassification of assets held for sale as discontinued
operations.
The 2004 adjustments below represent the incremental adjustments
as previously reported on the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
(Item 8 Note 22) for the 52 weeks ended
January 1, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth | |
|
Third | |
|
Second | |
|
First | |
|
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
52 Weeks Ended December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue, previously stated
|
|
$ |
173,468 |
|
|
$ |
214,782 |
|
|
$ |
176,778 |
|
|
$ |
183,796 |
|
|
Adjustment to reclassify for discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue, adjusted
|
|
$ |
173,468 |
|
|
$ |
214,782 |
|
|
$ |
176,778 |
|
|
$ |
183,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit, previously stated
|
|
$ |
27,126 |
|
|
$ |
22,901 |
|
|
$ |
28,190 |
|
|
$ |
36,301 |
|
|
Adjustment to reclassify for discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit, adjusted
|
|
$ |
27,126 |
|
|
$ |
22,901 |
|
|
$ |
28,190 |
|
|
$ |
36,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
9,061 |
|
|
$ |
6,905 |
|
|
$ |
12,081 |
|
|
$ |
13,136 |
|
|
Basic income per Common share
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
Diluted income per Common share
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
52 Weeks Ended January 1, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue, previously stated
|
|
$ |
167,103 |
|
|
$ |
210,665 |
|
|
$ |
162,188 |
|
|
$ |
176,834 |
|
|
Adjustment to reclassify for discontinued operations
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue, adjusted
|
|
$ |
167,157 |
|
|
$ |
210,770 |
|
|
$ |
162,281 |
|
|
$ |
176,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit, previously stated
|
|
$ |
28,498 |
|
|
$ |
32,735 |
|
|
$ |
28,770 |
|
|
$ |
34,808 |
|
|
Adjustment to reclassify for discontinued operations
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit, adjusted
|
|
$ |
28,591 |
|
|
$ |
32,736 |
|
|
$ |
28,785 |
|
|
$ |
34,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
24,365 |
|
|
$ |
(13,379 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,476 |
) |
|
$ |
4,839 |
|
|
Basic income (loss) per Common share
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
$ |
(0.33 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per Common share
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
(0.33 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
F-185
The exchange agent for the exchange offer is:
Global Bondholder Services Corporation
By facsimile:
(For Eligible Institutions only):
(212) 430-3775
Confirmation:
(212) 430-3774
|
|
|
|
|
By Mail:
65 Broadway Suite 723
New York, NY 10006 |
|
By Overnight Courier:
65 Broadway Suite 723
New York, NY 10006 |
|
By Hand:
65 Broadway Suite 723
New York, NY 10006 |
Any questions or requests for assistance or for additional
copies of the prospectus or the letter of transmittal may be
directed to the information agent at the telephone numbers set
forth below.
The information agent for the exchange offer is:
Global Bondholder Services Corporation
65 Broadway Suite 723
New York, NY 10006
Attn: Corporate Actions
Banks and Brokers call: (212) 430-3774
Toll free (866) 873-7700
We have not authorized any dealer, salesperson or other
person to give you written information other than this
prospectus or to make representations as to matters not stated
in this prospectus. You must not rely on unauthorized
information. This prospectus is not an offer to sell the notes
or our solicitation of your offer to buy the notes in any
jurisdiction where that would not be permitted or legal. Neither
the delivery of this prospectus nor any sales made hereunder
after the date of this prospectus shall create an implication
that the information contained herein or the affairs of the
company have not changed since the date of this prospectus.
Until November 29, 2006, all dealers that effect
transactions in these securities, whether or not participating
in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This
is in addition to the dealers obligation to deliver a
prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their
unused allotments or subscriptions.
Service Corporation International
$300,000,000
Offer to Exchange
Registered 7.0% Senior Notes Due 2017
for
All Outstanding 7.0% Senior Notes Due 2017
PROSPECTUS
October 19, 2006