KeyCorp 10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2008
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Transition Period From To
Commission File Number 1-11302
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
34-6542451 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
127 Public Square, Cleveland, Ohio
|
|
44114-1306 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(216) 689-6300
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Common Shares with a par value of $1 each
|
|
494,657,020 Shares |
|
|
|
(Title of class)
|
|
(Outstanding at July 31, 2008) |
KEYCORP
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
dollars in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
1,912 |
|
|
$ |
1,814 |
|
|
$ |
1,818 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
826 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
471 |
|
Trading account assets |
|
|
1,483 |
|
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
|
994 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
8,312 |
|
|
|
7,860 |
|
|
|
7,819 |
|
Held-to-maturity securities (fair value: $25, $28 and $37) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
1,559 |
|
|
|
1,538 |
|
|
|
1,602 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income of $2,532 $2,202 and $2,146 |
|
|
75,855 |
|
|
|
70,823 |
|
|
|
66,692 |
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
1,421 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
945 |
|
|
Net loans |
|
|
74,434 |
|
|
|
69,623 |
|
|
|
65,747 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
1,833 |
|
|
|
4,736 |
|
|
|
4,546 |
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
748 |
|
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
Operating lease assets |
|
|
1,089 |
|
|
|
1,128 |
|
|
|
1,110 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,598 |
|
|
|
1,252 |
|
|
|
1,202 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
Corporate-owned life insurance |
|
|
2,917 |
|
|
|
2,872 |
|
|
|
2,822 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
1,693 |
|
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
Accrued income and other assets |
|
|
2,969 |
|
|
|
4,122 |
|
|
|
3,715 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
101,544 |
|
|
$ |
98,228 |
|
|
$ |
92,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits in domestic offices: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW and money market deposit accounts |
|
$ |
27,278 |
|
|
$ |
27,635 |
|
|
$ |
23,315 |
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
1,513 |
|
|
|
1,613 |
|
Certificates of deposit ($100,000 or more) |
|
|
8,699 |
|
|
|
6,982 |
|
|
|
6,197 |
|
Other time deposits |
|
|
12,541 |
|
|
|
11,615 |
|
|
|
11,832 |
|
|
Total interest-bearing |
|
|
50,327 |
|
|
|
47,745 |
|
|
|
42,957 |
|
Noninterest-bearing |
|
|
10,561 |
|
|
|
11,028 |
|
|
|
14,199 |
|
Deposits in foreign office ¾ interest-bearing |
|
|
3,508 |
|
|
|
4,326 |
|
|
|
3,443 |
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
64,396 |
|
|
|
63,099 |
|
|
|
60,599 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements |
|
|
2,088 |
|
|
|
3,927 |
|
|
|
4,362 |
|
Bank notes and other short-term borrowings |
|
|
5,985 |
|
|
|
5,861 |
|
|
|
2,476 |
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
Accrued expense and other liabilities |
|
|
4,626 |
|
|
|
5,386 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
15,106 |
|
|
|
11,957 |
|
|
|
12,581 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
92,838 |
|
|
|
90,482 |
|
|
|
85,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $1 par value; authorized 25,000,000 shares, none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.750% Noncumulative Perpetual Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A, $1 par value,
$100 liquidation preference; authorized 7,475,000 shares, issued
6,500,000 shares |
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, $1 par value; authorized 1,400,000,000 shares;
issued 576,995,163, 491,888,780 and 491,888,780 shares |
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
Capital surplus |
|
|
2,544 |
|
|
|
1,623 |
|
|
|
1,652 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
7,461 |
|
|
|
8,522 |
|
|
|
8,720 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost (91,333,157, 103,095,907 and 102,527,008 shares) |
|
|
(2,675 |
) |
|
|
(3,021 |
) |
|
|
(2,994 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
8,706 |
|
|
|
7,746 |
|
|
|
7,701 |
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
101,544 |
|
|
$ |
98,228 |
|
|
$ |
92,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).
3
Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
dollars in millions, except per share amounts |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
INTEREST INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
717 |
|
|
$ |
1,176 |
|
|
$ |
1,840 |
|
|
$ |
2,337 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
Held-to-maturity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Trading account assets |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
1,395 |
|
|
|
2,234 |
|
|
|
2,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase
agreements |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
Bank notes and other short-term borrowings |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
1,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INTEREST INCOME |
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
1,071 |
|
|
|
1,365 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
834 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
Net interest (loss) income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
(289 |
) |
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
1,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NONINTEREST INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust and investment services income |
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
Investment banking and capital markets income |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
Operating lease income |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
Letter of credit and loan fees |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Corporate-owned life insurance income |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
Electronic banking fees |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Net gains (losses) from loan securitizations and sales |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
42 |
|
Net securities (losses) gains |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
Net (losses) gains from principal investing |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
119 |
|
Gain from redemption of Visa Inc. shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain from sale of McDonald Investments branch network |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
Other income |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
1,083 |
|
|
|
1,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NONINTEREST EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel |
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
813 |
|
|
|
839 |
|
Net occupancy |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
Computer processing |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
Operating lease expense |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Marketing |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
1,513 |
|
|
|
1,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
|
(515 |
) |
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
972 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
611 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
|
|
(1,126 |
) |
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
(908 |
) |
|
|
695 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes
of $2 and $7, respectively (see Note 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
NET (LOSS) INCOME |
|
$ |
(1,126 |
) |
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
$ |
(908 |
) |
|
$ |
684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income applicable to common shares |
|
$ |
(1,126 |
) |
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
$ |
(908 |
) |
|
$ |
684 |
|
Per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(2.70 |
) |
|
$ |
.86 |
|
|
$ |
(2.23 |
) |
|
$ |
1.76 |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(2.70 |
) |
|
|
.85 |
|
|
|
(2.23 |
) |
|
|
1.73 |
|
Per common share assuming dilution: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(2.70 |
) |
|
$ |
.85 |
|
|
$ |
(2.23 |
) |
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(2.70 |
) |
|
|
.84 |
|
|
|
(2.23 |
) |
|
|
1.71 |
|
Cash dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
.375 |
|
|
$ |
.365 |
|
|
$ |
.375 |
|
|
$ |
.73 |
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (000) |
|
|
416,629 |
|
|
|
392,045 |
|
|
|
407,875 |
|
|
|
394,944 |
|
Weighted-average common shares and potential common
shares outstanding (000) |
|
|
416,629 |
|
|
|
396,918 |
|
|
|
407,875 |
|
|
|
400,180 |
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).
4
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
Common Shares |
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Stock, |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
dollars in millions, except per share amounts |
|
Outstanding (000) |
|
|
Outstanding (000) |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Surplus |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
at Cost |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
BALANCE AT DECEMBER
31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
399,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
492 |
|
|
$ |
1,602 |
|
|
$ |
8,377 |
|
|
$ |
(2,584 |
) |
|
$ |
(184 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of
adopting FSP 13-2,
net of income taxes
of ($2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of
adopting FIN 48,
net of income taxes
of ($1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AT JANUARY 1,
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
684 |
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized
losses on
securities
available
for sale, net of income taxes of ($12)
a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
Net unrealized
gains on
derivative
financial
instruments, net
of income
taxes of $6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Foreign currency
translation
adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Net pension and
postretirement
benefit costs,
net of income
taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends
declared on common
shares ($.73 per
share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
reissued for stock
options and other
employee
benefit plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
repurchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(527 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AT JUNE 30,
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
389,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
492 |
|
|
$ |
1,652 |
|
|
$ |
8,720 |
|
|
$ |
(2,994 |
) |
|
$ |
(169 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AT DECEMBER
31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
388,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
492 |
|
|
$ |
1,623 |
|
|
$ |
8,522 |
|
|
$ |
(3,021 |
) |
|
$ |
130 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(908 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(908 |
) |
Other comprehensive
loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized
gains on
securities
available
for sale, net
of income
taxes of $10
a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Net unrealized
gains on
derivative
financial
instruments,
net of income
taxes of $1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Foreign currency
translation
adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Net pension and
postretirement
benefit costs,
net of income
taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(889 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends
declared on common
shares ($.375 per
share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock issued |
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
reissued: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of U.S.B. Holding
Co., Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
options and other
employee benefit
plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AT JUNE 30,
2008 |
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
485,662 |
|
|
$ |
650 |
|
|
$ |
577 |
|
|
$ |
2,544 |
|
|
$ |
7,461 |
|
|
$ |
(2,675 |
) |
|
$ |
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Net of reclassification adjustments. |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).
5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(908 |
) |
|
$ |
684 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
834 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
Litigation reserve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
Net securities losses (gains) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
45 |
|
Liability to Visa |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain from redemption of Visa Inc. shares |
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain from sale of McDonald Investments branch network |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(171 |
) |
Gain related to MasterCard Incorporated shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
Gain from settlement of automobile residual value
insurance litigation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
Net losses (gains) from principal investing |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(119 |
) |
Net losses (gains) from loan securitizations and sales |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
Loss from sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Proceeds from settlement of automobile residual value
insurance litigation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
279 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
Net decrease (increase) in loans held for sale from
continuing operations |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
(909 |
) |
Net increase in trading account assets |
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
(82 |
) |
Other operating activities, net |
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
(343 |
) |
|
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
(430 |
) |
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from redemption of Visa Inc. shares |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of McDonald Investments branch network, net of retention payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
199 |
|
Proceeds from sale of MasterCard Incorporated shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
Cash used in acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net increase in short-term investments |
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
(143 |
) |
Purchases of securities available for sale |
|
|
(793 |
) |
|
|
(3,955 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale |
|
|
836 |
|
|
|
2,449 |
|
Proceeds from prepayments and maturities of securities available for sale |
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
1,443 |
|
Purchases of held-to-maturity securities |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from prepayments and maturities of held-to-maturity securities |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Purchases of other investments |
|
|
(306 |
) |
|
|
(363 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of other investments |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
Proceeds from prepayments and maturities of other investments |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Net increase in loans, excluding acquisitions, sales and transfers |
|
|
(1,560 |
) |
|
|
(1,309 |
) |
Purchases of loans |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
Proceeds from loan securitizations and sales |
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
Purchases of premises and equipment |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
(1,012 |
) |
|
|
(1,139 |
) |
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in deposits |
|
|
(509 |
) |
|
|
1,480 |
|
Net (decrease) increase in short-term borrowings |
|
|
(2,505 |
) |
|
|
2,158 |
|
Net proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
3,900 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(910 |
) |
|
|
(1,845 |
) |
Purchases of treasury shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(527 |
) |
Net proceeds from issuance of common shares and preferred stock |
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from reissuance of common shares |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
Tax benefits (under) over recognized compensation cost for stock-based awards |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(298 |
) |
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
1,284 |
|
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
(446 |
) |
CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
|
1,814 |
|
|
|
2,264 |
|
|
CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS AT END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
1,912 |
|
|
$ |
1,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional disclosures relative to cash flows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
1,144 |
|
|
$ |
1,416 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
Noncash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired |
|
$ |
2,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities assumed |
|
|
2,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans transferred to portfolio from held for sale |
|
|
3,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans transferred to held for sale from portfolio |
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans transferred to other real estate owned |
|
|
23 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
The unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements include the accounts of KeyCorp
and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated
in consolidation.
As used in these notes:
¨ |
|
KeyCorp refers solely to the parent holding company. |
|
¨ |
|
KeyBank refers to KeyCorps subsidiary bank, KeyBank National Association. |
|
¨ |
|
Key refers to the consolidated entity consisting of KeyCorp and its subsidiaries. |
The consolidated financial statements include any voting rights entity in which Key has a
controlling financial interest. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Revised Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, a variable interest entity
(VIE) is consolidated if Key has a variable interest in the entity and is exposed to the majority
of its expected losses and/or residual returns (i.e., Key is considered to be the primary
beneficiary). Variable interests can include equity interests, subordinated debt, derivative
contracts, leases, service agreements, guarantees, standby letters of credit, loan commitments, and
other contracts, agreements and financial instruments. See Note 8 (Variable Interest Entities)
on page 23 for information on Keys involvement with VIEs.
Management uses the equity method to account for unconsolidated investments in voting rights
entities or VIEs in which Key has significant influence over operating and financing decisions
(usually defined as a voting or economic interest of 20% to 50%, but not a controlling interest).
Unconsolidated investments in voting rights entities or VIEs in which Key has a voting or economic
interest of less than 20% generally are carried at cost. Investments held by KeyCorps registered
broker/dealer and investment company subsidiaries (primarily principal investments) are carried at
fair value.
Qualifying special purpose entities, including securitization trusts, established by Key under the
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 140, Accounting for
Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, are not
consolidated. Information on SFAS No. 140 is included in Note 1 (Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies) of Keys 2007 Annual Report to Shareholders under the heading Loan
Securitizations on page 67.
Management believes that the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements reflect
all adjustments of a normal recurring nature and disclosures that are necessary for a fair
presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. Some previously reported results
have been reclassified to conform to current reporting practices.
The results of operations for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results of
operations to be expected for the full year. The interim financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Keys
2007 Annual Report to Shareholders.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill and certain intangible assets
are subject to impairment testing, which must be conducted at least annually. Key typically
performs this required testing in the fourth quarter of each year, or more frequently if events or
circumstances indicate possible impairment. Keys reporting units for purposes of this testing are
its major business segments: Community Banking and National Banking.
7
The first step in impairment testing is to determine the fair value of each reporting unit. If the
carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, goodwill impairment may be indicated.
In such a case, Key would estimate a purchase price for the reporting unit (representing the units
fair value) and then compare that hypothetical purchase price to the fair value of the units net
assets (excluding goodwill). Any excess of the estimated purchase price over the fair value of the
reporting units net assets represents the implied fair value of goodwill. An impairment loss
would be recognized as a charge to earnings to the extent the carrying amount of the reporting
units goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill.
Keys results for the second quarter of 2008 were adversely affected by after-tax charges of $1.011
billion, resulting from a previously announced adverse federal court decision on the tax treatment
of a Service Contract Lease transaction, and a substantial increase to the provision for loan
losses. As a result of these charges, management tested Keys goodwill for impairment as of June
30, 2008, and determined that no impairment existed at that date.
Two primary assumptions are used in determining the fair value of Keys reporting units: Keys
revenue growth rate and the future weighted-average cost of capital. Assuming that these
assumptions remain unchanged, an incremental after-tax charge exceeding approximately $700 million
within the National
Banking reporting unit would likely require additional impairment testing steps since the carrying
amount of this unit would then exceed its fair value.
Derivatives
Effective January 1, 2008, Key adopted the accounting guidance in FASB Staff Position FIN 39-1,
Amendment of FASB Interpretation 39, and as a result, also adopted the provisions of
Interpretation No. 39, Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts. As a result of
adopting this guidance, Key changed its accounting policy pertaining to the recognition of
derivative assets and liabilities to take into account the impact of master netting agreements that
allow Key to settle all derivative contracts held with a single counterparty on a net basis and to
offset the net derivative position with the related cash collateral. Additional information
regarding Keys adoption of this accounting guidance is provided in Note 14 (Derivatives and
Hedging Activities), which begins on page 31, and under the heading Accounting Pronouncements
Adopted in 2008 on page 9 of this note.
Fair Value Measurements
Effective January 1, 2008, Key adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, for all applicable
financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities. This accounting guidance defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies only when other guidance requires or permits assets or
liabilities to be measured at fair value; it does not expand the use of fair value in any new
circumstances.
As defined in SFAS No. 157, fair value is the price to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants. It represents an exit price at the measurement
date. Market participants are buyers and sellers, who are independent, knowledgeable, and willing
and able to transact in the principal (or most advantageous) market for the asset or liability
being measured. Current market conditions, including imbalances between supply and demand, are
considered in determining fair value.
Key values its assets and liabilities in the principal market where it sells the particular asset
or transfers the liability with the greatest volume and level of activity. In the absence of a
principal market, the valuation is based on the most advantageous market for the asset or liability
(i.e., the market where the asset could be sold or the liability transferred at a price that
maximizes the amount to be received for the asset or minimizes the amount to be paid to transfer
the liability).
In measuring the fair value of an asset, Key assumes the highest and best use of the asset by a
market participant to maximize the value of the asset, and does not consider the intended use of
the asset.
8
When measuring the fair value of a liability, Key assumes that the nonperformance risk associated
with the liability is the same before and after the transfer. Nonperformance risk is the risk that
an obligation will not be satisfied and encompasses not only Keys own credit risk (i.e., the risk
that Key will fail to meet its obligation). but also other risks such as settlement risk. Key
considers the effect of its own credit risk on the fair value for any period in which fair value is
measured.
There are three acceptable valuation techniques that can be used to measure fair value: the market
approach, the income approach and the cost approach. Selection of the appropriate technique for
valuing a particular asset or liability takes into consideration the exit market, the nature of the
asset or liability being valued, and how a market participant would value the same asset or
liability. Ultimately, determination of the appropriate valuation method requires significant
judgment, and sufficient knowledge and expertise are required to apply the valuation techniques.
Valuation inputs refer to the assumptions market participants would use in pricing a given asset or
liability using one of the three valuation techniques. Inputs can be observable or unobservable.
Observable inputs are those assumptions which market participants would use in pricing the
particular asset or liability. These inputs are based on market data and are obtained from a
source independent of Key.
Unobservable inputs are assumptions based on Keys own information or estimate of assumptions used
by market participants in pricing the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs are based on the
best and most current information available on the measurement date.
All inputs, whether observable or unobservable, are ranked in accordance with a prescribed fair
value hierarchy which gives the highest ranking to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest ranking to unobservable inputs (Level 3).
Fair values for assets or liabilities classified as Level 2 are based on one or a combination of
the following factors: (i) quoted prices for similar assets; (ii) observable inputs for the asset
or liability, such as interest rates or yield curves; or (iii) inputs derived principally from or
corroborated by observable market data. The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the
fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is
significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Key considers an input to be
significant if it drives 10% or more of the total fair value of a particular asset or liability.
Assets and liabilities are considered to be fair valued on a recurring basis if fair value is
measured regularly (i.e., daily, weekly, monthly or quarterly). Recurring valuation occurs at a
minimum on the measurement date.
Assets and liabilities are considered to be fair valued on a nonrecurring basis if the fair value
measurement of the instrument does not necessarily result in a change in the amount recorded on the
balance sheet. Generally, nonrecurring valuation is the result of the application of other
accounting pronouncements which require assets or liabilities to be assessed for impairment or
recorded at the lower of cost or fair value.
The fair value of assets or liabilities transferred in or out of Level 3 is measured on the
transfer date, with any additional changes in fair value subsequent to the transfer considered to
be realized or unrealized gains or losses.
Additional information regarding fair value measurements and Keys adoption of SFAS No. 157 is
provided in Note 15 (Fair Value Measurements), which begins on page 34, and under the heading
Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in 2008 below.
Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in 2008
Fair value measurements. In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, which defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. This guidance applies only when other guidance requires or permits assets or
liabilities to be measured at fair value; it does not expand the use of fair value in any new
circumstances. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007
(January 1, 2008, for Key). In February 2008, the FASB
9
issued Staff Position FAS 157-2, which
delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except
those recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at
least annually), to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. However, early adoption of
SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities within the scope of the new guidance is
permitted. Keys January 1, 2008, adoption of SFAS No. 157 for all financial and nonfinancial
assets and liabilities did not have a material effect on Keys financial condition or results of
operations. Additional information regarding fair value measurements and Keys adoption of this
accounting guidance is provided in Note 15 and under the heading Fair Value Measurements on page
8 of this note.
Fair value option for financial assets and financial liabilities. In February 2007, the FASB
issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. This
guidance provides an option to selectively report financial assets and liabilities at fair value,
and establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between
entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities.
SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 (January 1, 2008, for
Key). Key has elected to not apply this fair value option to any of its existing assets or
liabilities. However, Key may apply this guidance to assets or liabilities in the future as
permitted under SFAS No. 159.
Offsetting of amounts related to certain contracts. In April 2007, the FASB issued Staff Position
FIN 39-1, which supplements Interpretation No. 39 by allowing reporting entities to offset fair
value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral (a receivable) or the obligation
to return cash (a payable) arising from derivative instruments with the same counterparty.
Interpretation No. 39 allowed reporting entities to offset fair value amounts recognized for
derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under a master netting agreement. Key
did not previously adopt the provisions of Interpretation No. 39 that were permitted but not
required. The accounting guidance in Staff Position FIN 39-1 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007 (January 1, 2008, for Key). Key has elected to adopt the
accounting guidance in Staff Position FIN 39-1, and as a result, also adopted the provisions of
Interpretation No. 39. The adoption of this accounting guidance did not have a material effect on
Keys financial condition or results of operations. Additional information regarding Keys
adoption of this accounting guidance is provided in Note 14 and under the heading Derivatives on
page 8 of this note.
Accounting Pronouncements Pending Adoption at June 30, 2008
Employers accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. In September
2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other
Postretirement Plans. Except for the measurement requirement, Key adopted this accounting
guidance as of December 31, 2006. Additional information regarding the adoption of SFAS No. 158 is
included in Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) under the heading Accounting
Pronouncements Pending Adoption at December 31, 2007 on page 71 of Keys 2007 Annual Report to
Shareholders. The requirement to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of the end of an
employers fiscal year is effective for years ending after December 15, 2008 (December 31, 2008,
for Key). Adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material effect on Keys financial
condition or results of operations.
Business combinations. In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations.
The new pronouncement requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize only
the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction (e.g., acquisition costs must be
expensed when incurred), establishes the fair value at the date of acquisition as the initial
measurement for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed, and requires expanded disclosures.
SFAS No. 141(R) will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 (January 1,
2009, for Key). Early adoption is prohibited.
Noncontrolling interests. In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB No. 51. The new pronouncement
requires all entities to report noncontrolling (minority) interests in subsidiaries as a component
of shareholders equity. SFAS No. 160 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2008 (January 1, 2009, for Key). Early adoption is prohibited. Management is evaluating the
potential effect this guidance may have on Keys financial condition and results of operations.
10
Accounting for transfers of financial assets and repurchase financing transactions. In February
2008, the FASB issued Staff Position FAS 140-3, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and
Repurchase Financing Transactions. This Staff Position provides guidance on accounting for a
transfer of a financial asset and a repurchase financing, and presumes that an initial transfer of
a financial asset and a repurchase financing are considered part of the same arrangement (linked
transaction) under SFAS No. 140. However, if certain criteria are met, the initial transfer and
repurchase financing shall be evaluated separately under SFAS No. 140. Staff Position FAS 140-3
will be effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 (January 1, 2009, for Key),
and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is prohibited. Management is
evaluating the potential effect this guidance may have on Keys financial condition and results of
operations.
Disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities. In March 2008, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, which amends and
expands the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities. This accounting guidance requires qualitative disclosures about objectives
and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts and gains
and losses on derivative
instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative
agreements. SFAS No. 161 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008
(January 1, 2009, for Key).
Determination of the useful life of intangible assets. In April 2008, the FASB issued Staff
Position FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets. This accounting
guidance amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension
assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. This Staff Position will be effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008 (January 1, 2009, for Key), and for interim periods within those
fiscal years. Early adoption is prohibited. Adoption of this accounting guidance is not expected
to have a material effect on Keys financial condition or results of operations.
Hierarchy of generally accepted accounting principles. In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162,
The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. This guidance identifies the sources
of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the
preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. SFAS No. 162 will be effective 60 days
following the SECs approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU
Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles. Adoption of this accounting guidance is not expected to have a material effect on
Keys financial condition or results of operations.
Accounting for convertible debt instruments. In May 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position APB 14-1,
Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (including
Partial Cash Settlement). This guidance requires the issuer of certain convertible debt
instruments that may be settled in cash (or other assets) on conversion to separately account for
the liability (debt) and equity (conversion option) components of the instrument in a manner that
reflects the issuers nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. This Staff Position is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 (January 1, 2009, for Key), and for interim periods
within those fiscal years. Early adoption is prohibited. Key has not issued and does not have any
convertible debt instruments outstanding that are subject to the accounting guidance in this Staff
Position. Therefore, adoption of this accounting guidance is not expected to have a material
effect on Keys financial condition or results of operations.
11
2. Earnings Per Common Share
Keys basic and diluted earnings per common share are calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six
months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June
30, |
|
dollars in millions, except per share amounts |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
EARNINGS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(1,126 |
) |
|
$ |
337 |
|
|
$ |
(908 |
) |
|
$ |
695 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(1,126 |
) |
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
$ |
(908 |
) |
|
$ |
684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income applicable to common shares |
|
$ |
(1,126 |
) |
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
$ |
(908 |
) |
|
$ |
684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE COMMON SHARES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
(000) |
|
|
416,629 |
|
|
|
392,045 |
|
|
|
407,875 |
|
|
|
394,944 |
|
Effect of dilutive convertible preferred stock, common stock
options and other stock awards (000) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,236 |
|
|
Weighted-average common shares and potential common shares
outstanding (000) |
|
|
416,629 |
|
|
|
396,918 |
|
|
|
407,875 |
|
|
|
400,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(2.70 |
) |
|
$ |
.86 |
|
|
$ |
(2.23 |
) |
|
$ |
1.76 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.03 |
) |
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(2.70 |
) |
|
|
.85 |
|
|
|
(2.23 |
) |
|
|
1.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations
assuming dilution |
|
$ |
(2.70 |
) |
|
$ |
.85 |
|
|
$ |
(2.23 |
) |
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations assuming
dilution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.03 |
) |
Net (loss) income assuming dilution |
|
|
(2.70 |
) |
|
|
.84 |
|
|
|
(2.23 |
) |
|
|
1.71 |
|
|
3. Acquisitions and Divestitures
Acquisitions and divestitures completed by Key during 2007 and the first six months of 2008 are
summarized below.
Acquisitions
U.S.B. Holding Co., Inc.
On January 1, 2008, Key acquired U.S.B. Holding Co., Inc., the holding company for Union State
Bank, a 31-branch state-chartered commercial bank headquartered in Orangeburg, New York. U.S.B.
Holding Co. had assets of $2.8 billion and deposits of $1.8 billion at the date of acquisition.
Under the terms of the agreement, 9,895,000 KeyCorp common shares, with a value of $348 million,
and $194 million in cash were exchanged for all of the outstanding shares of U.S.B. Holding Co. In
connection with the acquisition, Key recorded goodwill of approximately $350 million. The
acquisition expanded Keys presence in markets both within and contiguous to its current operations
in the Hudson Valley.
Tuition Management Systems, Inc.
On October 1, 2007, Key acquired Tuition Management Systems, Inc., one of the nations largest
providers of outsourced tuition planning, billing, counseling and payment services. Headquartered
in Warwick, Rhode Island, Tuition Management Systems serves more than 700 colleges, universities,
elementary and secondary educational institutions. The terms of the transaction were not material.
12
Divestitures
Champion Mortgage
On February 28, 2007, Key sold the Champion Mortgage loan origination platform to an affiliate of
Fortress Investment Group LLC, a global alternative investment and asset management firm, for cash
proceeds of $.5 million.
On November 29, 2006, Key sold the subprime mortgage loan portfolio held by the Champion Mortgage
finance business to a wholly owned subsidiary of HSBC Finance Corporation for cash proceeds of $2.5
billion. The loan portfolio totaled $2.5 billion at the date of sale.
Key has applied discontinued operations accounting to the Champion Mortgage finance business. The
results of this discontinued business are presented on one line as loss from discontinued
operations, net of taxes in the Consolidated Statements of Income on page 4. The components of
loss from discontinued operations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Six months |
|
|
|
ended June 30, |
|
|
ended June 30, |
|
in millions |
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Loss, net of taxes of ($1) and ($3), respectively a |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
Loss on disposal, net of taxes of ($1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Disposal transaction costs, net of taxes of ($1) and ($3), respectively |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes after-tax charges of $.07 million for the three-month period
ended June 30, 2007, and $.7 million for the six-month period ended June
30, 2007, determined by applying a matched funds transfer pricing
methodology to the liabilities assumed necessary to support Champions
operations. |
The discontinued assets and liabilities of Champion Mortgage included in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets on page 3 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
in millions |
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
Accrued income and other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expense and other liabilities |
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
McDonald Investments branch network
On February 9, 2007, McDonald Investments Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of KeyCorp, sold its
branch network, which included approximately 570 financial advisors and field support staff, and
certain fixed assets to UBS Financial Services Inc., a subsidiary of UBS AG. Key received cash
proceeds of $219 million and recorded a gain of $171 million ($107 million after tax, $.26 per
diluted common share) in connection with the sale. Key retained McDonald Investments corporate
and institutional businesses,
including Institutional Equities and Equity Research, Debt Capital Markets and Investment Banking.
In addition, KeyBank continues to operate the Wealth Management, Trust and Private Banking
businesses. On April 16, 2007, Key renamed the registered broker/dealer through which its
corporate and institutional investment banking and securities businesses operate to KeyBanc Capital
Markets Inc.
13
4. Line of Business Results
Community Banking
Regional Banking provides individuals with branch-based deposit and investment products, personal
finance services and loans, including residential mortgages, home equity and various types of
installment loans. This line of business also provides small businesses with deposit, investment
and credit products, and business advisory services.
Regional Banking also offers financial, estate and retirement planning, and asset management
services to assist high-net-worth clients with their banking, trust, portfolio management,
insurance, charitable giving and related needs.
Commercial Banking provides midsize businesses with products and services that include commercial
lending, cash management, equipment leasing, investment and employee benefit programs, succession
planning, access to capital markets, derivatives and foreign exchange.
National Banking
Real Estate Capital and Corporate Banking Services consists of two business units. Real Estate
Capital is a national business that provides construction and interim lending, permanent debt
placements and servicing, equity and investment banking, and other commercial banking products and
services to developers, brokers and owner-investors. This unit deals primarily with
nonowner-occupied properties (i.e., generally properties in which at least 50% of the debt service
is provided by rental income from nonaffiliated third parties). Particular emphasis has been
placed on providing clients with finance solutions through access to the capital markets.
Corporate Banking Services provides cash management, interest rate derivatives, and foreign
exchange products and services to clients throughout the Community Banking and National Banking
groups. Through its Public Sector and Financial Institutions businesses, Corporate Banking
Services provides a full array of commercial banking products and services to government and
not-for-profit entities, and to community banks.
Equipment Finance meets the equipment leasing needs of companies worldwide and provides equipment
manufacturers, distributors and resellers with financing options for their clients. Lease
financing receivables and related revenues are assigned to other lines of business (primarily
Institutional and Capital Markets, and Commercial Banking) if those businesses are principally
responsible for maintaining the relationship with the client.
Institutional and Capital Markets, through its KeyBanc Capital Markets unit, provides commercial
lending, treasury management, investment banking, derivatives and foreign exchange, equity and debt
underwriting and trading, and syndicated finance products and services to large corporations and
middle-market companies.
Through its Victory Capital Management unit, Institutional and Capital Markets also manages or
offers advice regarding investment portfolios for a national client base, including corporations,
labor unions, not-
for-profit organizations, governments and individuals. These portfolios may be managed in separate
accounts, common funds or the Victory family of mutual funds.
Consumer Finance offers loans to consumers on a direct basis and an indirect basis through dealers.
It also provides federal and private education loans to students and their parents, and processes
tuition payments for private schools. Through its Commercial Floor Plan Lending unit, Consumer
Finance finances inventory for automobile, recreation and marine dealers.
Other Segments
Other Segments consist of Corporate Treasury and Keys Principal Investing unit.
14
Reconciling Items
Total assets included under Reconciling Items primarily represent the unallocated portion of
nonearning assets of corporate support functions. Charges related to the funding of these assets
are part of net interest income and are allocated to the business segments through noninterest
expense. Reconciling Items also includes intercompany eliminations and certain items that are not
allocated to the business segments because they do not reflect their normal operations.
The table that spans pages 16 and 17 shows selected financial data for each major business group
for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. This table is accompanied by
supplementary information for each of the lines of business that make up these groups. The
information was derived from the internal financial reporting system that management uses to
monitor and manage Keys financial performance. U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) guide financial accounting, but there is no authoritative guidance for management
accounting the way management uses its judgment and experience to make reporting decisions.
Consequently, the line of business results Key reports may not be comparable with line of business
results presented by other companies.
The selected financial data are based on internal accounting policies designed to compile results
on a consistent basis and in a manner that reflects the underlying economics of the businesses.
According to Keys policies:
¨ |
|
Net interest income is determined by assigning a standard cost for
funds used or a standard credit for funds provided based on their
assumed maturity, prepayment and/or repricing characteristics.
The net effect of this funds transfer pricing is charged to the
lines of business based on the total loan and deposit balances of
each line. |
|
¨ |
|
Indirect expenses, such as computer servicing costs and corporate
overhead, are allocated based on assumptions regarding the extent
to which each line actually uses the services. |
|
¨ |
|
Keys consolidated provision for loan losses is allocated among
the lines of business primarily based on their actual net
charge-offs, adjusted periodically for loan growth and changes in
risk profile. The amount of the consolidated provision is based
on the methodology that management uses to estimate Keys
consolidated allowance for loan losses. This methodology is
described in Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies)
under the heading Allowance for Loan Losses on page 67 of Keys
2007 Annual Report to Shareholders. |
|
¨ |
|
Income taxes are allocated based on the statutory federal income
tax rate of 35% (adjusted for tax-exempt interest income, income
from corporate-owned life insurance, and tax credits associated
with investments in low-income housing projects) and a blended
state income tax rate (net of the federal income tax benefit) of
2.5%. |
|
¨ |
|
Capital is assigned based on managements assessment of economic
risk factors (primarily credit, operating and market risk)
directly attributable to each line. |
Developing and applying the methodologies that management uses to allocate items among Keys lines
of business is a dynamic process. Accordingly, financial results may be revised periodically to
reflect accounting enhancements, changes in the risk profile of a particular business or changes in
Keys organizational structure.
Effective January 1, 2008, Key moved the Public Sector, Bank Capital Markets and Global Treasury
Management units from the Institutional and Capital Markets line of business to the Real Estate
Capital and Corporate Banking Services (previously known as Real Estate Capital) line of business
within the National Banking group.
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
Community Banking |
|
|
National Banking |
|
dollars in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss) (TE) |
|
$ |
437 |
|
|
$ |
417 |
|
|
$ |
(472 |
) d |
|
$ |
339 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
Total revenue (TE) a |
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
612 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
Other noninterest expense |
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes (TE) |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
(1,072 |
) |
|
|
250 |
|
Allocated income taxes and TE adjustments |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
93 |
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
(670 |
) |
|
|
157 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
(670 |
) |
|
$ |
154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of consolidated income from continuing operations |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
47 |
% |
Percent of total segments income from continuing operations |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
AVERAGE BALANCES b |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases |
|
$ |
28,478 |
|
|
$ |
26,574 |
|
|
$ |
47,876 |
|
|
$ |
39,325 |
|
Total assets a |
|
|
31,385 |
|
|
|
29,346 |
|
|
|
56,242 |
|
|
|
49,585 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
49,948 |
|
|
|
46,126 |
|
|
|
12,289 |
|
|
|
12,082 |
|
|
OTHER FINANCIAL DATA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loan charge-offs |
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
486 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
Return on average allocated equity b |
|
|
13.68 |
% |
|
|
16.57. |
% |
|
|
(51.60 |
)% |
|
|
15.12 |
% |
Return on average allocated equity |
|
|
13.68 |
|
|
|
16.57 |
|
|
|
(51.60 |
) |
|
|
14.83 |
|
Average full-time equivalent employees |
|
|
8,785 |
|
|
|
9,026 |
|
|
|
3,603 |
|
|
|
3,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
Community Banking |
|
|
National Banking |
|
dollars in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss) (TE) |
|
$ |
860 |
|
|
$ |
836 |
|
|
$ |
(133 |
) d |
|
$ |
675 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
602 |
c |
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
532 |
d |
|
|
Total revenue (TE) a |
|
|
1,288 |
|
|
|
1,438 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
1,207 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
Other noninterest expense |
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
506 |
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes (TE) |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
(1,110 |
) |
|
|
499 |
|
Allocated income taxes and TE adjustments |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
(416 |
) |
|
|
187 |
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
(694 |
) |
|
|
312 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
219 |
|
|
$ |
307 |
|
|
$ |
(694 |
) |
|
$ |
301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of consolidated income from continuing operations |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
Percent of total segments income from continuing operations |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
AVERAGE BALANCES b |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases |
|
$ |
28,303 |
|
|
$ |
26,514 |
|
|
$ |
46,013 |
|
|
$ |
39,085 |
|
Total assets a |
|
|
31,227 |
|
|
|
29,317 |
|
|
|
56,230 |
|
|
|
49,003 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
49,857 |
|
|
|
46,322 |
|
|
|
12,088 |
|
|
|
11,691 |
|
|
OTHER FINANCIAL DATA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loan charge-offs |
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
577 |
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
Return on average allocated equity b |
|
|
14.57 |
% |
|
|
25.08 |
% |
|
|
(27.53 |
)% |
|
|
15.30 |
% |
Return on average allocated equity |
|
|
14.57 |
|
|
|
25.08 |
|
|
|
(27.53 |
) |
|
|
14.76 |
|
Average full-time equivalent employees |
|
|
8,750 |
|
|
|
9,242 |
|
|
|
3,680 |
|
|
|
4,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Substantially all revenue generated by Keys major business groups is derived from clients
with residency in the United States. Substantially all long-lived assets, including premises
and equipment, capitalized software and goodwill held by Keys major business groups are
located in the United States. |
|
(b) |
|
From continuing operations. |
|
(c) |
|
Community Bankings results for the first quarter of 2007 include a $171 million ($107
million after tax) gain from the February 9, 2007, sale of the McDonald Investments branch
network. See Note 3 (Acquisitions and Divestitures), which begins on page 12, for more
information pertaining to this transaction. |
|
(d) |
|
During the second quarter of 2008, National Bankings taxable-equivalent net interest income
and net income were reduced by $838 million and $536 million, respectively, as a result of an
adverse federal court decision on the tax treatment of a Service Contract Lease transaction.
During the prior quarter, National Banking increased its tax reserves for certain lease in,
lease out transactions and recalculated its lease income in accordance with prescribed
accounting standards. These actions reduced National Bankings taxable-equivalent revenue by
$34 million and its net income by $21 million in the first quarter. National Bankings
results for the first quarter of 2007 include a $26 million ($17 million after tax) gain from
the settlement of the residual value insurance litigation. |
|
(e) |
|
Other Segments results for the second quarter of 2007 include a $26 million ($16 million
after tax) charge for litigation. This charge and the litigation referred to in note (f)
below comprise the $42 million charge recorded in connection with the Honsador litigation
disclosed in Note 13 (Contingent Liabilities and Guarantees), which begins on page 29.
Results for the first quarter of 2007 include a $49 million ($31 million after tax) loss from
the repositioning of the securities portfolio. |
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Segments |
|
|
Total Segments |
|
|
Reconciling Items |
|
|
Key |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(31 |
) |
|
$ |
(20 |
) |
|
$ |
(66 |
) |
|
$ |
736 |
|
|
$ |
(34 |
) |
|
$ |
(30 |
) |
|
$ |
(100 |
) |
|
$ |
706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
41 |
f |
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
1,344 |
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
1,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
33 |
e |
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
6 |
f |
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
(945 |
) |
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(973 |
) |
|
|
487 |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(366 |
) |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
519 |
f |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
(579 |
) |
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
(547 |
) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(1,126 |
) |
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
(579 |
) |
|
$ |
311 |
|
|
$ |
(547 |
) |
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
(1,126 |
) |
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
93 |
% |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
N/M |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
177 |
|
|
$ |
266 |
|
|
$ |
76,531 |
|
|
$ |
66,165 |
|
|
$ |
121 |
|
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
$ |
76,652 |
|
|
$ |
66,315 |
|
|
14,098 |
|
|
|
12,387 |
|
|
|
101,725 |
|
|
|
91,318 |
|
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
|
2,094 |
|
|
|
103,290 |
|
|
|
93,412 |
|
|
3,092 |
|
|
|
2,361 |
|
|
|
65,329 |
|
|
|
60,569 |
|
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
65,132 |
|
|
|
60,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
524 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
524 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
(26.45 |
)% |
|
|
17.71 |
% |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
(52.56 |
)% |
|
|
17.66 |
% |
|
N/M |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
(26.45 |
) |
|
|
17.54 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
(52.56 |
) |
|
|
17.50 |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
12,431 |
|
|
|
12,925 |
|
|
|
5,733 |
|
|
|
5,963 |
|
|
|
18,164 |
|
|
|
18,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Segments |
|
|
Total Segments |
|
|
Reconciling Items |
|
|
Key |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(58 |
) |
|
$ |
(46 |
) |
|
$ |
669 |
|
|
$ |
1,465 |
|
|
$ |
(65 |
) |
|
$ |
(59 |
) |
|
$ |
604 |
|
|
$ |
1,406 |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
128 |
e |
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
1,262 |
|
|
|
155 |
f |
|
|
41 |
f |
|
|
1,083 |
|
|
|
1,303 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
2,727 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
1,687 |
|
|
|
2,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
834 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
43 |
e |
|
|
1,322 |
|
|
|
1,392 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) f |
|
|
1,296 |
|
|
|
1,390 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
(782 |
) |
|
|
1,029 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(660 |
) |
|
|
1,013 |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(315 |
) |
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
563 |
f |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
(467 |
) |
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
(441 |
) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(908 |
) |
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
$ |
(467 |
) |
|
$ |
655 |
|
|
$ |
(441 |
) |
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
(908 |
) |
|
$ |
684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
96 |
% |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
N/M |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
207 |
|
|
$ |
273 |
|
|
$ |
74,523 |
|
|
$ |
65,872 |
|
|
$ |
147 |
|
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
$ |
74,670 |
|
|
$ |
65,994 |
|
|
14,260 |
|
|
|
12,339 |
|
|
|
101,717 |
|
|
|
90,659 |
|
|
|
1,606 |
|
|
|
2,099 |
|
|
|
103,323 |
|
|
|
92,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,945 |
|
|
|
58,013 |
|
|
|
3,764 |
|
|
|
2,068 |
|
|
|
65,709 |
|
|
|
60,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
645 |
|
|
$ |
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
645 |
|
|
$ |
97 |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
(10.90 |
)% |
|
|
19.06 |
% |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
(21.40 |
)% |
|
|
18.35 |
% |
|
N/M |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
(10.90 |
) |
|
|
18.75 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
(21.40 |
) |
|
|
18.06 |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
12,473 |
|
|
|
13,355 |
|
|
|
5,822 |
|
|
|
5,987 |
|
|
|
18,295 |
|
|
|
19,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
(f) |
|
Reconciling Items for the second quarter of 2008 include a $475 million charge to income
taxes for the interest cost associated with the leveraged lease tax litigation. Reconciling Items for the prior quarter
include a $165 million ($103 million after tax) gain from the partial redemption of Keys equity interest in Visa
Inc. and a $17 million charge to income taxes for the interest cost associated with the increase to Keys tax reserves for
certain lease in, lease out transactions. Reconciling Items for the second quarter of 2007 include a $40 million ($25
million after tax) gain related to MasterCard Incorporated shares, and a $16 million ($10 million after tax) charge for
litigation. |
|
TE |
|
= Taxable Equivalent |
|
N/A |
|
= Not Applicable |
|
N/M |
|
= Not Meaningful |
17
Supplementary information (Community Banking lines of business)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
Regional Banking |
|
|
Commercial Banking |
|
dollars in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Total revenue (TE) |
|
$ |
557 |
|
|
$ |
537 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Net income |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Average loans and leases |
|
|
19,608 |
|
|
|
18,471 |
|
|
|
8,870 |
|
|
|
8,103 |
|
Average deposits |
|
|
46,246 |
|
|
|
42,725 |
|
|
|
3,702 |
|
|
|
3,401 |
|
Net loan charge-offs |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Net loan charge-offs to average loans |
|
|
.68 |
% |
|
|
.43 |
% |
|
|
.23 |
% |
|
|
.30 |
% |
Nonperforming assets at period end |
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
Return on average allocated equity |
|
|
15.06 |
% |
|
|
17.38 |
% |
|
|
10.21 |
% |
|
|
14.67 |
% |
Average full-time equivalent employees |
|
|
8,439 |
|
|
|
8,655 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
Regional Banking |
|
|
Commercial Banking |
|
dollars in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Total revenue (TE) |
|
$ |
1,087 |
|
|
$ |
1,253 |
|
|
$ |
201 |
|
|
$ |
185 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Noninterest expense |
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
Net income |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Average loans and leases |
|
|
19,540 |
|
|
|
18,485 |
|
|
|
8,763 |
|
|
|
8,029 |
|
Average deposits |
|
|
46,211 |
|
|
|
42,890 |
|
|
|
3,646 |
|
|
|
3,432 |
|
Net loan charge-offs |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Net loan charge-offs to average loans |
|
|
.64 |
% |
|
|
.41 |
% |
|
|
.14 |
% |
|
|
.18 |
% |
Nonperforming assets at period end |
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
Return on average allocated equity |
|
|
15.21 |
% |
|
|
29.11 |
% |
|
|
12.90 |
% |
|
|
15.49 |
% |
Average full-time equivalent employees |
|
|
8,402 |
|
|
|
8,870 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
Supplementary information (National Banking lines of business)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Capital and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institutional and |
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
Corporate Banking Services |
|
|
Equipment Finance |
|
|
Capital Markets |
|
|
Consumer Finance |
|
dollars in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Total revenue (TE) |
|
$ |
233 |
|
|
$ |
214 |
|
|
$ |
(694 |
) |
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
$ |
231 |
|
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
(512 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
23 |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
(512 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
Average loans and leases a |
|
|
17,086 |
|
|
|
13,713 |
|
|
|
10,326 |
|
|
|
10,609 |
|
|
|
7,897 |
|
|
|
6,566 |
|
|
|
12,567 |
|
|
|
8,437 |
|
Average loans held for sale a |
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
2,658 |
|
Average deposits a |
|
|
10,460 |
|
|
|
9,447 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
1,384 |
|
|
|
2,072 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
Net loan charge-offs |
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Net loan charge-offs to average loans a |
|
|
8.85 |
% |
|
|
.09 |
% |
|
|
1.09 |
% |
|
|
.60 |
% |
|
|
.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.46 |
% |
|
|
.38 |
% |
Nonperforming assets at period end |
|
$ |
779 |
|
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
Return on average allocated equity a |
|
|
(23.69 |
)% |
|
|
20.43 |
% |
|
|
(225.30 |
)% |
|
|
11.43 |
% |
|
|
13.61 |
% |
|
|
13.92 |
% |
|
|
(32.07 |
)% |
|
|
11.56 |
% |
Return on average allocated equity |
|
|
(23.69 |
) |
|
|
20.43 |
|
|
|
(225.30 |
) |
|
|
11.43 |
|
|
|
13.61 |
|
|
|
13.92 |
|
|
|
(32.07 |
) |
|
|
10.05 |
|
Average full-time equivalent employees |
|
|
1,228 |
|
|
|
1,293 |
|
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Capital and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institutional and |
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
Corporate Banking Services |
|
|
Equipment Finance |
|
|
Capital Markets |
|
|
Consumer Finance |
|
dollars in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Total revenue (TE) |
|
$ |
310 |
|
|
$ |
403 |
|
|
$ |
(593 |
) |
|
$ |
282 |
|
|
$ |
389 |
|
|
$ |
316 |
|
|
$ |
208 |
|
|
$ |
206 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
(525 |
) |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
58 |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
(525 |
) |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
47 |
|
Average loans and leases a |
|
|
16,785 |
|
|
|
13,675 |
|
|
|
10,461 |
|
|
|
10,544 |
|
|
|
7,765 |
|
|
|
6,559 |
|
|
|
11,002 |
|
|
|
8,307 |
|
Average loans held for sale a |
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
1,738 |
|
|
|
2,643 |
|
Average deposits a |
|
|
10,124 |
|
|
|
8,996 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1,421 |
|
|
|
2,122 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
Net loan charge-offs |
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Net loan charge-offs to average loans a |
|
|
4.95 |
% |
|
|
.06 |
% |
|
|
1.00 |
% |
|
|
.55 |
% |
|
|
.18 |
% |
|
|
.03 |
% |
|
|
1.92 |
% |
|
|
.44 |
% |
Nonperforming assets at period end |
|
$ |
779 |
|
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
Return on average allocated equity a |
|
|
(14.31 |
)% |
|
|
20.18 |
% |
|
|
(115.01 |
)% |
|
|
10.41 |
% |
|
|
11.05 |
% |
|
|
13.49 |
% |
|
|
(20.24 |
)% |
|
|
14.81 |
% |
Return on average allocated equity |
|
|
(14.31 |
) |
|
|
20.18 |
|
|
|
(115.01 |
) |
|
|
10.41 |
|
|
|
11.05 |
|
|
|
13.49 |
|
|
|
(20.24 |
) |
|
|
12.00 |
|
Average full-time equivalent employees |
|
|
1,230 |
|
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
848 |
|
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
934 |
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
871 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
From continuing operations. |
|
TE = Taxable Equivalent |
18
5. Securities
Securities available for sale. These are securities that Key intends to hold for an indefinite
period of time but that may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, prepayment risk,
liquidity needs or other factors. Securities available for sale are reported at fair value.
Unrealized gains and losses (net of income taxes) deemed temporary are recorded in shareholders
equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the balance sheet.
Unrealized losses on specific securities deemed to be other-than-temporary are included in net
securities (losses) gains on the income statement, as are actual gains and losses resulting from
the sales of securities.
When Key retains an interest in loans it securitizes, it bears risk that the loans will be prepaid
(which would reduce expected interest income) or not paid at all. Key accounts for these retained
interests as debt securities and classifies them as available for sale.
Other securities held in the available-for-sale portfolio are primarily marketable equity
securities.
Held-to-maturity securities. These are debt securities that Key has the intent and ability to hold
until maturity. Debt securities are carried at cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and
accretion of discounts using the interest method. This method produces a constant rate of return
on the adjusted carrying amount. Other securities held in the held-to-maturity portfolio are
foreign bonds and preferred equity securities.
The amortized cost, unrealized gains and losses, and approximate fair value of Keys securities
available for sale and held-to-maturity securities are presented in the following tables. Gross
unrealized gains and losses are represented by the difference between the amortized cost and the
fair value of securities on the balance sheet as of the dates indicated. Accordingly, the amount
of these gains and losses may change in the future as market conditions improve or worsen.
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
in millions |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury, agencies and corporations |
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
States and political subdivisions |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
6,309 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
6,350 |
|
Other mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
1,583 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1,584 |
|
Retained interests in securitizations |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187 |
|
Other securities |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
Total securities available for sale |
|
$ |
8,237 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
8,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HELD-TO-MATURITY SECURITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
Other securities |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
Total held-to-maturity securities |
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
in millions |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury, agencies and corporations |
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
States and political subdivisions |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
6,167 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
|
6,167 |
|
Other mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,403 |
|
Retained interests in securitizations |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185 |
|
Other securities |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
Total securities available for sale |
|
$ |
7,810 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
7,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HELD-TO-MATURITY SECURITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
Other securities |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
Total held-to-maturity securities |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
in millions |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury, agencies and corporations |
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
States and political subdivisions |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
6,421 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
|
6,313 |
|
Other mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
1,133 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
1,113 |
|
Retained interests in securitizations |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193 |
|
Other securities |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
Total securities available for sale |
|
$ |
7,881 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
133 |
|
|
$ |
7,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HELD-TO-MATURITY SECURITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
Other securities |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
Total held-to-maturity securities |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
6. Loans and Loans Held for Sale
Keys loans by category are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
|
$ |
25,929 |
|
|
$ |
24,797 |
|
|
$ |
21,814 |
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage |
|
|
10,737 |
|
|
|
9,630 |
|
|
|
8,629 |
|
Construction |
|
|
7,849 |
|
|
|
8,102 |
|
|
|
8,214 |
|
|
Total commercial real estate loans |
|
|
18,586 |
a |
|
|
17,732 |
|
|
|
16,843 |
|
Commercial lease financing |
|
|
9,610 |
|
|
|
10,176 |
|
|
|
10,138 |
|
|
Total commercial loans |
|
|
54,125 |
|
|
|
52,705 |
|
|
|
48,795 |
|
Real estate residential mortgage |
|
|
1,928 |
|
|
|
1,594 |
|
|
|
1,572 |
|
Home equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Banking |
|
|
9,851 |
|
|
|
9,655 |
|
|
|
9,736 |
|
National Banking |
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
|
1,262 |
|
|
|
1,143 |
|
|
Total home equity loans |
|
|
11,004 |
|
|
|
10,917 |
|
|
|
10,879 |
|
Consumer other Community Banking |
|
|
1,261 |
|
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
|
1,366 |
|
Consumer other National Banking: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marine |
|
|
3,634 |
|
|
|
3,637 |
|
|
|
3,444 |
|
Education |
|
|
3,584 |
b |
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
Other |
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
Total consumer other National Banking |
|
|
7,537 |
|
|
|
4,309 |
|
|
|
4,080 |
|
|
Total consumer loans |
|
|
21,730 |
|
|
|
18,118 |
|
|
|
17,897 |
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
75,855 |
|
|
$ |
70,823 |
|
|
$ |
66,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
During the second quarter of 2008, Key transferred $384 million of commercial real estate
loans ($719 million of primarily construction loans, net of $335 million in net charge-offs)
from the loan portfolio to held-for-sale status. |
|
(b) |
|
On March 31, 2008, Key transferred $3.3 billion of education loans from loans held for sale
to the loan portfolio. |
Key uses interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risk; these swaps modify the repricing
characteristics of certain loans. For more information about such swaps, see Note 19 (Derivatives
and Hedging Activities), which begins on page 100 of Keys 2007 Annual Report to Shareholders.
Keys loans held for sale by category are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
|
$ |
212 |
|
|
$ |
250 |
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
Real estate commercial mortgage |
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
1,613 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
398 |
a |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
Commercial lease financing |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Real estate residential mortgage |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Education |
|
|
103 |
b |
|
|
3,176 |
|
|
|
2,616 |
|
Automobile |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
Total loans held for sale |
|
$ |
1,833 |
|
|
$ |
4,736 |
|
|
$ |
4,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
During the second quarter of 2008, Key transferred $384 million of commercial real estate
loans ($719 million of primarily construction loans, net of $335 million in net charge-offs)
from the loan portfolio to held-for-sale status. |
|
(b) |
|
On March 31, 2008, Key transferred $3.3 billion of education loans from loans held for sale
to the loan portfolio. |
21
Changes in the allowance for loan losses are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
1,298 |
|
|
$ |
944 |
|
|
$ |
1,200 |
|
|
$ |
944 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(554 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(702 |
) |
|
|
(136 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
Net loans charged off |
|
|
(524 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(645 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
Provision for loan losses from continuing operations |
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
834 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
Allowance related to loans acquired, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
1,421 |
|
|
$ |
945 |
|
|
$ |
1,421 |
|
|
$ |
945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the liability for credit losses on lending-related commitments are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
(Credit) provision for losses on lending-related commitments |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Balance at end of period a |
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. |
7. Mortgage Servicing Assets
Key originates and periodically sells commercial mortgage loans but continues to service those
loans for the buyers. Key may also purchase the right to service commercial mortgage loans for
other lenders. Changes in the carrying amount of mortgage servicing assets are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
313 |
|
|
$ |
247 |
|
Servicing retained from loan sales |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Purchases |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
272 |
|
|
$ |
272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at end of period |
|
$ |
426 |
|
|
$ |
371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of mortgage servicing assets is determined by calculating the present value of
future cash flows associated with servicing the loans. This calculation uses a number of
assumptions that are based on current market conditions. Primary economic assumptions used to
measure the fair value of Keys mortgage servicing assets at June 30, 2008, and 2007, are as
follows:
¨ |
|
prepayment speed generally at an annual rate of 0.00% to 25.00%; |
|
¨ |
|
expected credit losses at a static rate of 2.00%; and |
|
¨ |
|
residual cash flows discount rate of 8.50% to 15.00%. |
22
Changes in these assumptions could cause the fair value of mortgage servicing assets to change in
the future. The volume of loans serviced and expected credit losses are critical to the valuation
of servicing assets. A 1.00% increase in the assumed default rate of commercial mortgage loans at
June 30, 2008, would cause a $9 million decrease in the fair value of Keys mortgage servicing
assets.
Contractual fee income from servicing commercial mortgage loans totaled $32 million and $34 million
for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The amortization of
servicing assets for each year, as shown in the preceding table, is recorded as a reduction to fee
income. Both the contractual fee income and the amortization are recorded in other income on the
income statement.
8. Variable Interest Entities
A VIE is a partnership, limited liability company, trust or other legal entity that meets any one
of certain criteria specified in FASB Revised Interpretation No. 46. This interpretation requires
a VIE to be consolidated by the party that is exposed to a majority of the VIEs expected losses
and/or residual returns (i.e., the primary beneficiary).
Keys VIEs, including those consolidated and those in which Key holds a significant interest, are
summarized below. Key defines a significant interest in a VIE as a subordinated interest that
exposes Key to a significant portion, but not the majority, of the VIEs expected losses or
residual returns.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated VIEs |
|
|
Unconsolidated VIEs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
in millions |
|
Total Assets |
|
|
Total Assets |
|
|
Exposure to Loss |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low-income housing tax credit (LIHTC) funds |
|
$ |
261 |
|
|
$ |
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
LIHTC investments |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
720 |
|
|
$ |
287 |
|
|
The noncontrolling interests associated with the consolidated LIHTC guaranteed funds are considered
mandatorily redeemable instruments and are recorded in accrued expense and other liabilities on
the balance sheet. The FASB has indefinitely deferred the measurement and recognition provisions
of SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both
Liabilities and Equity, for mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests associated with
finite-lived subsidiaries, such as Keys LIHTC guaranteed funds. Key currently accounts for these
interests as minority interests and adjusts the financial statements each period for the investors
share of the funds profits and losses. At June 30, 2008, the settlement value of these
noncontrolling interests was estimated to be between $233 million and $272 million, while the
recorded value, including reserves, totaled $274 million.
Keys Principal Investing unit and the Real Estate Capital and Corporate Banking Services line of
business make equity and mezzanine investments in entities, some of which are VIEs. These
investments are held by nonregistered investment companies subject to the provisions of the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Audit and Accounting Guide, Audits of
Investment Companies. The FASB deferred the effective date of Revised Interpretation No. 46 for
such nonregistered investment companies until the AICPA clarifies the scope of the Audit Guide. As
a result, Key is not currently applying the accounting or disclosure provisions of Revised
Interpretation No. 46 to its principal and real estate equity and mezzanine investments, which
remain unconsolidated.
Additional information pertaining to Revised Interpretation No. 46 and the activities of the
specific VIEs with which Key is involved is provided in Note 8 (Loan Securitizations, Servicing
and Variable Interest
Entities) of Keys 2007 Annual Report to Shareholders under the heading Variable Interest
Entities on page 82.
23
9. Nonperforming Assets and Past Due Loans
Impaired loans totaled $628 million at June 30, 2008, compared to $519 million at December 31,
2007, and $137 million at June 30, 2007. Impaired loans had an average balance of $733 million for
the second quarter of 2008 and $124 million for the second quarter of 2007.
Keys nonperforming assets and past due loans were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
628 |
|
|
$ |
519 |
|
|
$ |
137 |
|
Other nonaccrual loans |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
Total nonperforming loans |
|
|
814 |
a |
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans held for sale |
|
|
342 |
a |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned (OREO) |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Allowance for OREO losses |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
OREO, net of allowance |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Other nonperforming assets b |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
Total nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
1,210 |
|
|
$ |
764 |
|
|
$ |
378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans with a specifically allocated allowance |
|
$ |
564 |
|
|
$ |
426 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
Specifically allocated allowance for impaired loans |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more |
|
$ |
367 |
|
|
$ |
231 |
|
|
$ |
181 |
|
Accruing loans past due 30 through 89 days |
|
|
852 |
|
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
During the second quarter of 2008, Key transferred $384 million of commercial real estate
loans ($719 million of primarily construction loans, net of $335 million in net charge-offs) from the loan portfolio to
held-for-sale status. |
|
(b) |
|
Primarily investments held by the Private Equity unit within Keys Real Estate Capital and
Corporate Banking Services line of business. |
At June 30, 2008, Key did not have any significant commitments to lend additional funds to
borrowers with loans on nonperforming status.
Management evaluates the collectibility of Keys loans as described in Note 1 (Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies) under the heading Allowance for Loan Losses on page 67 of Keys
2007 Annual Report to Shareholders.
24
10. Capital Securities Issued by Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
KeyCorp owns the outstanding common stock of business trusts that issued corporation-obligated
mandatorily redeemable preferred capital securities. The trusts used the proceeds from the
issuance of their capital securities and common stock to buy debentures issued by KeyCorp. These
debentures are the trusts only assets; the interest payments from the debentures finance the
distributions paid on the capital securities.
The capital securities provide an attractive source of funds: they constitute Tier 1 capital for
regulatory reporting purposes, but have the same tax advantages as debt for federal income tax
purposes. During the first quarter of 2005, the Federal Reserve Board adopted a rule that allows
bank holding companies to continue to treat capital securities as Tier 1 capital, but imposed
stricter quantitative limits that take effect after a five-year transition period ending March 31,
2009. Management believes the new rule will not have any material effect on Keys financial
condition.
KeyCorp unconditionally guarantees the following payments or distributions on behalf of the trusts:
¨ |
|
required distributions on the capital securities; |
|
¨ |
|
the redemption price when a capital security is redeemed; and |
|
¨ |
|
the amounts due if a trust is liquidated or terminated. |
During the first six months of 2008, the KeyCorp Capital X trust issued $740 million of securities.
Also included in the table below are the capital securities held by the Union State Capital I,
Union State Statutory II and Union State Statutory IV business trusts. The outstanding common
stock of these trusts was owned by U.S.B. Holding Co., Inc., which Key acquired on January 1, 2008.
The capital securities, common stock and related debentures are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
|
Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
of Capital |
|
|
of Capital |
|
|
|
Securities, |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Debentures, |
|
|
Securities and |
|
|
Securities and |
|
dollars in millions |
|
Net of Discount a |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Net of Discount b |
|
|
Debentures c |
|
|
Debentures |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KeyCorp Capital I |
|
$ |
197 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
201 |
|
|
|
3.438 |
% |
|
|
2028 |
|
KeyCorp Capital II |
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
6.875 |
|
|
|
2029 |
|
KeyCorp Capital III |
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
7.750 |
|
|
|
2029 |
|
KeyCorp Capital V |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
5.875 |
|
|
|
2033 |
|
KeyCorp Capital VI |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
6.125 |
|
|
|
2033 |
|
KeyCorp Capital VII |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
5.700 |
|
|
|
2035 |
|
KeyCorp Capital VIII |
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
7.000 |
|
|
|
2066 |
|
KeyCorp Capital IX |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
6.750 |
|
|
|
2066 |
|
KeyCorp Capital X |
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
8.000 |
|
|
|
2068 |
|
Union State Capital I |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
9.580 |
|
|
|
2027 |
|
Union State Statutory II |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
6.479 |
|
|
|
2031 |
|
Union State Statutory IV |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
5.513 |
|
|
|
2034 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,622 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
2,675 |
|
|
|
6.814 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,848 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
1,896 |
|
|
|
6.599 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,718 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
1,838 |
|
|
|
6.608 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The capital securities must be redeemed when the related debentures mature, or earlier if
provided in the governing indenture. Each issue of capital securities carries an interest
rate identical to that of the related debenture. Included in certain capital securities at
June 30, 2008, December 31, 2007, and June 30, 2007, are basis adjustments of $39 million, $55
million and ($75) million, respectively, related to fair value hedges. See Note 19
(Derivatives and Hedging Activities), which begins on page 100 of Keys 2007 Annual Report
to Shareholders, for an explanation of fair value hedges. |
|
(b) |
|
KeyCorp has the right to redeem its debentures: (i) in whole or in part, on or after July 1,
2008 (for debentures owned by Capital I); March 18, 1999 (for debentures owned by Capital II);
July 16, 1999 (for debentures owned by Capital III); July 31, 2006 (for debentures owned by
Union State Statutory II); February 1, 2007 (for debentures owned by Union State Capital I);
July 21, 2008 |
25
|
|
|
|
|
(for debentures owned by Capital V); December 15, 2008 (for debentures owned by Capital VI); April
7, 2009 (for debentures owned by Union State Statutory IV); June 15, 2010 (for debentures
owned by Capital VII); June 15, 2011 (for debentures owned by Capital VIII); December 15, 2011
(for debentures owned by Capital IX); and March 15, 2013 (for debentures owned by Capital X);
and (ii) in whole at any time within 90 days after and during the continuation of a tax
event, an investment company event or a capital treatment event (as defined in the
applicable indenture). If the debentures purchased by Union State Statutory IV, Capital I,
Capital V, Capital VI, Capital VII, Capital VIII, Capital IX or Capital X are redeemed before
they mature, the redemption price will be the principal amount, plus any accrued but unpaid
interest. If the debentures purchased by Union State Capital I are redeemed before they
mature, the redemption price will be 104.31% of the principal amount, plus any accrued but
unpaid interest. If the debentures purchased by Union State Statutory II are redeemed before
they mature, the redemption price will be 106.00% of the principal amount, plus any accrued
but unpaid interest. If the debentures purchased by Capital II or Capital III are redeemed
before they mature, the redemption price will be the greater of: (a) the principal amount,
plus any accrued but unpaid interest or (b) the sum of the present values of principal and
interest payments discounted at the Treasury Rate (as defined in the applicable indenture),
plus 20 basis points (25 basis points for Capital III), plus any accrued but unpaid interest.
When debentures are redeemed in response to tax or capital treatment events, the redemption
price generally is slightly more favorable to KeyCorp. Included in the principal amount of
debentures at June 30, 2008, December 31, 2007, and June 30, 2007, are adjustments relating to
hedging with financial instruments totaling $52 million, $64 million and $6 million,
respectively. |
|
(c) |
|
The interest rates for Capital II, Capital III, Capital V, Capital VI, Capital VII, Capital
VIII, Capital IX, Capital X and Union State Capital I are fixed. Capital I has a floating
interest rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 74 basis points that reprices quarterly. Union
State Statutory II has a floating interest rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 358 basis
points that reprices quarterly. Union State Statutory IV has a floating interest rate equal
to three-month LIBOR plus 280 basis points that reprices quarterly. The rates shown as the
totals at June 30, 2008, December 31, 2007, and June 30, 2007, are weighted-average rates. |
11. Employee Benefits
Pension Plans
The components of net pension cost and the amount recognized in comprehensive income (loss) for all
funded and unfunded plans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Service cost of benefits earned |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of losses |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Curtailment gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
Net pension cost |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
Key sponsors a contributory postretirement healthcare plan that covers substantially all active and
retired employees hired before 2001 who meet certain eligibility criteria. Retirees contributions
are adjusted annually to reflect certain cost-sharing provisions and benefit limitations. Key also
sponsors life insurance plans covering certain grandfathered employees. These plans are
principally noncontributory. Separate Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association trusts are used
to fund the healthcare plan and one of the life insurance plans.
The components of net postretirement benefit (income) cost and the amount recognized in
comprehensive income (loss) for all funded and unfunded plans are as follows:
Other Postretirement Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Service cost of benefits earned |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Interest cost on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Amortization of unrecognized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transition obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Prior service benefit |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cumulative net gain |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net postretirement benefit (income) cost |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
12. Income Taxes
Lease Financing Transactions
In the ordinary course of business, Keys equipment finance business unit (KEF) enters into
various types of lease financing transactions. Between 1996 and 2004, KEF entered into three types
of lease financing transactions with both foreign and domestic customers (primarily municipal
authorities) for terms ranging from ten to fifty years. Lease in, lease out (LILO) transactions
are leveraged leasing transactions in which KEF leases property from an unrelated third party and
then leases the property back to that party. The transaction is similar to a sale-leaseback,
except that KEF leases the property rather than purchasing it. Qualified Technological Equipment
Leases (QTEs) and Service Contract Leases are even more like sale-leaseback transactions, as KEF
is considered to be the purchaser of the equipment for tax purposes. LILO and Service Contract
Lease transactions involve commuter rail equipment, public utility facilities and commercial
aircraft. QTE transactions involve sophisticated high technology hardware and related software,
such as telecommunications equipment.
Like other forms of leasing transactions, LILO transactions generate income tax deductions for Key
from net rental expense associated with the leased property, interest expense on nonrecourse debt
incurred to fund the transaction, and transaction costs. QTE and Service Contract Lease
transactions generate rental income, as well as deductions from the depreciation of the property,
interest expense on nonrecourse debt incurred to fund the transaction, and transaction costs.
Prior to 2004, LILO, QTE and Service Contract Leases were prevalent in the financial services
industry and in certain other industries. The tax treatment that Key applied was based on
applicable statutes, regulations and judicial authority. However, in subsequent years, the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has challenged the tax treatment of these transactions by a number
of bank holding companies and other corporations.
Currently, the IRS is auditing Keys income tax returns for the 2004 through 2006 tax years. The
IRS has completed audits of Keys income tax returns for the 1995 through 2003 tax years and has
disallowed all net deductions that relate to LILOs, QTEs and Service Contract Leases. Key appealed
the examination results for the tax years 1995 through 1997, which pertained to LILOs only, to the
Appeals Division of the IRS. During the fourth quarter of 2005, discussions with the Appeals
Division were discontinued without a resolution. In April 2006, Key received a final assessment
from the IRS, consisting of taxes, interest and penalties, disallowing all LILO deductions taken in
the 1995-1997 tax years. Key paid the final assessment and filed a refund claim for the total
amount. Key also has filed appeals with the Appeals Division of the IRS with regard to the
proposed disallowance of the LILO, QTE and Service Contract Lease deductions taken in the 1998
through 2003 tax years. Key and the Appeals Division of the IRS have ongoing discussions regarding
these transactions, as well as the LILOs entered into for the tax years 1995 through 1997. Key
intends to vigorously pursue the IRS appeals process and litigation alternatives.
In addition, in connection with one Service Contract Lease transaction entered into by AWG Leasing
Trust (AWG Leasing), in which Key is a partner, the IRS completed its audit for the 1998 through
2003 tax years, disallowed all deductions related to the transaction for those years and assessed
penalties. In March 2007, Key filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of Ohio (captioned AWG Leasing Trust, KSP Investments, Inc., as Tax Matters Partner v.
United States of America, and referred to herein as the AWG Leasing Litigation), claiming that
the disallowance of the deductions and assessment of penalties were erroneous. The case proceeded
to a bench trial, which commenced on January 21, 2008. On May 28, 2008, the Court rendered a
decision that was adverse to Key. Management disagreed with the decision and, on July 23, 2008,
Key filed a notice of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Although the Court decision applies only to the AWG Leasing Litigation, under applicable accounting
guidance, the decision has implications for the timing of the recognition of tax benefits on Keys
entire portfolio of LILO, QTE and Service Contract Leases. Therefore, management has updated its
assessment of Keys tax position in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes. As a result, during the second quarter of 2008, Key increased the
amount of its unrecognized tax benefits associated with all of the leases under challenge by the
IRS by $2.15 billion.
27
This amount has not been reduced by existing tax deposits of $200 million. Key also recorded a
related $475 million charge to the provision for income taxes for the interest cost associated
with the contested leases. Key has not recognized any charge for penalties or interest on
penalties that the IRS has asserted or may assert in the future.
The increase in unrecognized tax benefits associated with the contested leases necessitated a
recalculation of Keys lease income under FASB Staff Position No. 13-2, Accounting for a Change or
Projected Change in the Timing of Cash Flows Relating to Income Taxes Generated by a Leveraged
Lease Transaction. This resulted in a $536 million reduction of Keys second quarter 2008
after-tax earnings, including a $359 million reduction to lease income and a $177 million increase
to the provision for income taxes. Of this amount, approximately $365 million will be taken back
into earnings over the remaining lives of the affected leases. The remaining $171 million
represents the reversal of the tax benefits previously recorded as a result of applying a lower tax
rate to a portion of these transactions that are managed by a foreign subsidiary in a lower tax
jurisdiction. These tax benefits will be recorded only if they are ultimately realized in the
future in the course of Keys ongoing challenge of the tax treatment.
During the first quarter of 2008, Key increased the amount of its unrecognized tax benefits
associated with its LILO transactions by $46 million. This adjustment resulted from an updated
assessment of Keys tax position performed by management in accordance with the provisions of FASB
Interpretation No. 48. The increase in unrecognized tax benefits associated with Keys LILO
transactions also necessitated a recalculation of Keys lease income under FASB Staff Position No.
13-2 and an increase to Keys tax reserves. These actions reduced Keys first quarter 2008
after-tax earnings by $38 million, including a $3 million reduction to lease income, an $18 million
increase to the provision for income taxes and a $17 million charge to the tax provision for the
associated interest charges.
While Key has recognized the effects of the adverse Court decision for financial statement
purposes, management continues to believe that the tax treatment Key applied to its leveraged lease
transactions complied with all tax laws, regulations and judicial authorities in effect at the
time, and Key has appealed the adverse trial court decision.
As permitted under FASB Interpretation No. 48, it is Keys policy to recognize interest and
penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. During the six months ended
June 30, 2008, Key recognized $762 million of pre-tax interest, of which $760 million ($475
million, after tax) was attributable to the increase in unrecognized tax benefits associated with
its LILO, QTE and Service Contract Lease transactions. Keys liability for accrued interest
payable was $804 million at June 30, 2008.
Key files United States federal income tax returns, as well as returns in various state and foreign
jurisdictions. With the exception of the California and New York jurisdictions, Key is not subject
to income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2001. Income tax returns filed in
California and New York are subject to examination beginning with the years 1995 and 2000,
respectively. As previously discussed, the audits of the 1998 through 2003 federal income tax
returns are currently on appeal to the Appeals Division of the IRS. The outcomes of these appeals
could impact the recognition of benefits related to Keys state, as well as federal, tax positions.
28
13. Contingent Liabilities and Guarantees
Legal Proceedings
Tax disputes. In the ordinary course of business, Key enters into transactions that have tax
consequences. On occasion, the IRS may challenge a particular tax position taken by Key. The IRS
has completed audits of Keys income tax returns for the 1995 through 2003 tax years and has
disallowed all deductions taken in those tax years that relate to certain lease financing
transactions. Further information on these matters is included in Note 12 (Income Taxes), which
begins on page 27.
Honsador litigation. In November 2004, Key Principal Partners, LLC (KPP), a Key affiliate, was
sued in Hawaii state court in connection with KPPs investment in a Hawaiian business. On May 23,
2007, in the case of Honsador Holdings LLC v. KPP, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the
plaintiffs. On June 13, 2007, the state court entered a final judgment in favor of the plaintiffs
in the amount of $38.25 million. During the three months ended June 30, 2007, Key established a
$42 million reserve for the verdict, legal costs and other expenses associated with this lawsuit.
As previously reported, Key has filed a notice of appeal with the Intermediate Court of Appeals for
the State of Hawaii (the ICA), and the appeal is currently pending before the ICA.
Other litigation. In the ordinary course of business, Key is subject to other legal actions that
involve claims for substantial monetary relief. Based on information presently known to
management, management does not believe there is any legal action to which KeyCorp or any of its
subsidiaries is a party, or involving any of their properties, that, individually or in the
aggregate, would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on Keys financial
condition.
Guarantees
Key is a guarantor in various agreements with third parties. The following table shows the types
of guarantees that Key had outstanding at June 30, 2008. Information pertaining to the basis for
determining the liabilities recorded in connection with these guarantees is included in Note 1
(Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) under the heading Guarantees on page 69 of Keys
2007 Annual Report to Shareholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Potential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undiscounted |
|
|
Liability |
|
in millions |
|
Future Payments |
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Financial guarantees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
$ |
14,911 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
Recourse agreement with FNMA |
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Return guarantee agreement with LIHTC investors |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Written interest rate caps a |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Default guarantees |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
15,997 |
|
|
$ |
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
As of June 30, 2008, the weighted-average interest rate of written interest rate caps was
2.7%, and the weighted-average
strike rate was 5.1%. Maximum potential undiscounted future payments were calculated assuming
a 10% interest rate. |
Standby letters of credit. Many of Keys lines of business issue standby letters of credit to
address clients financing needs. These instruments obligate Key to pay a specified third party
when a client fails to repay an outstanding loan or debt instrument, or fails to perform some
contractual nonfinancial obligation. Any amounts drawn under standby letters of credit are treated
as loans: they bear interest (generally at variable rates) and pose the same credit risk to Key as
a loan. At June 30, 2008, Keys standby letters of credit had
a remaining weighted-average life of approximately 2.2 years, with remaining actual lives ranging
from less than one year to as many as ten years.
29
Recourse agreement with Federal National Mortgage Association. KeyBank participates as a lender in
the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) Delegated Underwriting and Servicing program.
As a condition to FNMAs delegation of responsibility for originating, underwriting and servicing
mortgages, KeyBank has agreed to assume a limited portion of the risk of loss during the remaining
term on each commercial mortgage loan KeyBank sells to FNMA. Accordingly, KeyBank maintains a
reserve for such potential losses in an amount estimated by management to approximate the fair
value of KeyBanks liability. At June 30, 2008, the outstanding commercial mortgage loans in this
program had a weighted-average remaining term of 7.5 years, and the unpaid principal balance
outstanding of loans sold by KeyBank as a participant in this program was approximately $2.0
billion. The maximum potential amount of undiscounted future payments that KeyBank may be required
to make under this program is equal to approximately one-third of the principal balance of loans
outstanding at June 30, 2008. If KeyBank is required to make a payment it would have an interest
in the collateral underlying the commercial mortgage loan on which the loss occurred.
Return guarantee agreement with LIHTC investors. Key Affordable Housing Corporation (KAHC), a
subsidiary of KeyBank, offered limited partnership interests to qualified investors. Partnerships
formed by KAHC invested in low-income residential rental properties that qualify for federal LIHTCs
under Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code. In certain partnerships, investors pay a fee to
KAHC for a guaranteed return that is based on the financial performance of the property and the
propertys confirmed LIHTC status throughout a fifteen-year compliance period. If KAHC defaults on
its obligation to provide the guaranteed return, Key is obligated to make any necessary payments to
investors. In October 2003, management elected to discontinue new partnerships under this program.
Additional information regarding these partnerships is included in Note 8 (Variable Interest
Entities) on page 23.
No recourse or collateral is available to offset Keys guarantee obligation other than the
underlying income stream from the properties. These guarantees have expiration dates that extend
through 2018. Key meets its obligations pertaining to the guaranteed returns generally by
distributing tax credits and deductions associated with the specific properties.
As shown in the table on page 29, KAHC maintained a reserve in the amount of $54 million at June
30, 2008, which management believes will be sufficient to cover estimated future obligations under
the guarantees. The maximum exposure to loss reflected in the table represents undiscounted future
payments due to investors for the return on and of their investments. In accordance with FASB
Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees,
Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, the amount of all fees received in
consideration for any return guarantee agreements entered into or modified with LIHTC investors on
or after January 1, 2003, has been recognized as a component of the recorded liability.
Written interest rate caps. In the ordinary course of business, Key writes interest rate caps
for commercial loan clients that have variable rate loans with Key and wish to limit their exposure
to interest rate increases. At June 30, 2008, these caps had a weighted-average life of
approximately 2.1 years.
Key is obligated to pay the client if the applicable benchmark interest rate exceeds a specified
level (known as the strike rate). These instruments are accounted for as derivatives. Key
mitigates its potential future payments by entering into offsetting positions with third parties.
Default guarantees. Some lines of business provide or participate in guarantees that obligate Key
to perform if the debtor fails to satisfy all of its payment obligations to third parties. Key
generally undertakes these guarantees to support or protect its underlying investment or where the
risk profile of the debtor should provide an investment return. The terms of these default
guarantees range from less than one year to as many as fourteen years. Although no collateral is
held, Key would have recourse against the debtor for any payments made under a default guarantee.
30
Other Off-Balance Sheet Risk
Other off-balance sheet risk stems from financial instruments that do not meet the definition of a
guarantee as specified in Interpretation No. 45 and from other relationships.
Liquidity facilities that support asset-backed commercial paper conduits. Key provides liquidity
facilities to several unconsolidated third-party commercial paper conduits. These facilities
obligate Key to provide funding if there is a disruption in credit markets or other factors exist
that preclude the issuance of commercial paper by the conduits. The liquidity facilities, all of
which expire by November 10, 2010, obligate Key to provide aggregate funding of up to $1.1 billion,
with individual facilities ranging from $10 million to $127 million. The aggregate amount
available to be drawn is based on the amount of current commitments to borrowers and totaled $837
million at June 30, 2008. Keys commitments to provide liquidity are periodically evaluated by
management.
Indemnifications provided in the ordinary course of business. Key provides certain
indemnifications primarily through representations and warranties in contracts that are entered
into in the ordinary course of business in connection with loan sales and other ongoing activities,
as well as in connection with purchases and sales of businesses. Key maintains reserves, when
appropriate, with respect to liability it reasonably expects to incur in connection with these
indemnities.
Intercompany guarantees. KeyCorp and certain other Key affiliates are parties to various
guarantees that facilitate the ongoing business activities of other Key affiliates. These business
activities encompass debt issuance, certain lease and insurance obligations, investments and
securities, and certain leasing transactions involving clients.
14. Derivatives and Hedging Activities
Key, mainly through its subsidiary bank, KeyBank, is party to various derivative instruments that
are used for asset and liability management, credit risk management and trading purposes.
Derivative instruments are contracts between two or more parties. They have a notional amount and
underlying variable, require no net investment and allow for the net settlement of positions. The
notional amount serves as the basis for the payment provision of the contract and takes the form of
units, such as shares or dollars. The underlying variable represents a specified interest rate,
index or other component. The interaction between the notional amount and the underlying variable
determines the number of units to be exchanged between the parties and drives the market value of
the derivative contract.
The primary derivatives that Key uses are interest rate swaps, caps and futures, credit derivatives
and foreign exchange forward contracts. Generally, these instruments help Key manage exposure to
market risk, mitigate the credit risk inherent in the loan portfolio and meet client financing
needs. Market risk represents the possibility that economic value or net interest income will be
adversely affected by changes in interest rates or other economic factors.
Derivative assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet, after taking
into account the effects of master netting agreements. These agreements allow Key to settle all
derivative contracts held with a single counterparty on a net basis, and to offset net derivative
positions with the related cash collateral. As a result, Key could have derivative contracts with
negative fair values included in derivative assets on the balance sheet and contracts with positive
fair values included in derivative liabilities.
At June 30, 2008, Key had $309 million of derivative assets and a $142 million debit balance in
derivative liabilities that relate to contracts entered into for hedging purposes. As of the same
date, Key had trading derivative assets of $1.4 billion and trading derivative liabilities of $779
million.
31
Counterparty Credit Risk
The following table summarizes the fair value of Keys derivative assets by type. These assets
represent Keys exposure to potential loss after taking into account the effects of master netting
agreements and other means used to mitigate risk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Interest rate |
|
$ |
693 |
|
|
$ |
850 |
|
|
$ |
156 |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
Energy |
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Credit |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Equity |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Derivative assets before cash collateral |
|
|
1,889 |
|
|
|
1,441 |
|
|
|
497 |
|
Less: Related cash collateral |
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
Total derivative assets |
|
$ |
1,693 |
|
|
$ |
879 |
|
|
$ |
374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Like other financial instruments, derivatives contain an element of credit risk the possibility
that Key will incur a loss because a counterparty, which may be a bank or a broker/dealer, fails to
meet its contractual obligations. This risk is measured as the expected positive replacement value
of contracts. To mitigate credit risk, Key deals exclusively with counterparties that have high
credit ratings.
Key uses two additional means to manage exposure to credit risk on derivative contracts. First,
Key generally enters into bilateral collateral and master netting agreements. These agreements
provide for the net settlement of all contracts with a single counterparty in the event of default.
Second, Keys Credit Administration department monitors credit risk exposure to the counterparty
on each contract to determine appropriate limits on Keys total credit exposure and decide whether
to demand collateral. If Key determines that collateral is required, it is generally collected
immediately. Key generally holds collateral in the form of cash and highly rated securities issued
by the U.S. Treasury, government sponsored enterprises or the Government National Mortgage
Association. The cash collateral netted against derivative assets on the balance sheet was $196
million at June 30, 2008, $562 million at December 31, 2007, and $123 million at June 30, 2007.
The cash collateral netted against derivative liabilities was $531 million at June 30, 2008, $254
million at December 31, 2007, and $134 million at June 30, 2007.
At June 30, 2008, Key was party to derivative contracts with 58 different counterparties. These
derivatives include interest rate swaps and caps, credit derivatives, foreign exchange contracts,
equity derivatives and energy derivatives. Among these were contracts entered into to offset the
risk of loss associated with contracts entered into to accommodate clients. Key had aggregate
exposure of $456 million on these instruments to 34 of the 58 counterparties. However, at June 30,
2008, Key held approximately $290 million in pooled collateral to mitigate that exposure, resulting
in net exposure of $166 million. The largest exposure to an individual counterparty was
approximately $209 million, which is secured with approximately $186 million in collateral.
Asset and Liability Management
Key uses fair value and cash flow hedging strategies to manage its exposure to interest rate risk.
These strategies reduce the potential adverse impact of interest rate movements on future net
interest income. For more information about these asset and liability management strategies, see
Note 19 (Derivatives and Hedging Activities), which begins on page 100 of Keys 2007 Annual
Report to Shareholders.
32
The change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) resulting from cash flow hedges is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
of Gains to |
|
|
June 30, |
|
in millions |
|
2007 |
|
|
Hedging Activity |
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) resulting from cash flow hedges |
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
(54 |
) |
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
Key reclassifies gains and losses from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to earnings
when a hedged item causes Key to pay variable-rate interest on debt, receive variable-rate interest
on commercial loans, or sell or securitize commercial real estate loans. If interest rates, yield
curves and notional amounts remain at current levels, management expects to reclassify an estimated
$54 million of net gains on derivative instruments from accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) to earnings during the next twelve months. The maximum length of time over which
forecasted transactions are hedged is twenty years.
Credit Risk Management
Key uses credit derivatives ¾ primarily credit default swaps ¾ to mitigate credit risk
by transferring a portion of the risk associated with the underlying extension of credit to a third
party. These instruments are also used to manage portfolio concentration and correlation risks.
At June 30, 2008, the notional amount of credit default swaps purchased by Key was $1.3 billion.
Key also provides credit protection to other lenders through the sale of credit default swaps.
These transactions may generate fee income and can diversify overall exposure to credit loss. At
June 30, 2008, the notional amount of credit default swaps sold by Key was $203 million.
These derivatives are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value, which is based on the
creditworthiness of the borrowers. Related gains or losses, as well as the premium paid or
received for credit protection, are included in investment banking and capital markets income on
the income statement. Key does not apply hedge accounting to credit derivatives.
Trading Portfolio
Keys trading portfolio includes:
¨ |
|
interest rate swap contracts entered into to accommodate the needs of clients; |
|
¨ |
|
positions with third parties that are intended to offset or mitigate the interest rate risk of client positions; |
|
¨ |
|
foreign exchange forward contracts entered into to accommodate the needs of clients; and |
|
¨ |
|
proprietary trading positions in financial assets and liabilities. |
The fair values of these trading portfolio items are included in derivative assets or derivative
liabilities on the balance sheet. Adjustments to the fair values are included in investment
banking and capital markets income on the income statement. Key has established a reserve in the
amount of $19 million at June 30, 2008, which management believes will be sufficient to cover
estimated future losses on the trading portfolio in the event of client default. Additional
information pertaining to Keys trading portfolio is summarized in Note 19 of Keys 2007 Annual
Report to Shareholders.
33
15. Fair Value Measurements
Effective January 1, 2008, Key adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, for all applicable
financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities. This accounting guidance defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies only when other guidance requires or permits assets or
liabilities to be measured at fair value; it does not expand the use of fair value in any new
circumstances. Additional information pertaining to Keys accounting policy for fair value
measurements is summarized in Note 1 (Basis of Presentation) under the heading Fair Value
Measurements on page 8.
Fair Value Determination
As defined in SFAS No. 157, fair value is the price to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants in Keys principal market. Key has established and
documented its process for determining the fair values of its assets and liabilities, where
applicable. Fair value is based on quoted market prices, when available, for identical or similar
assets or liabilities. In the absence of quoted market prices, management determines the fair
value of Keys assets and liabilities using valuation models or third-party pricing services, both
of which rely on market-based parameters when available, such as interest rate yield curves, option
volatilities and credit spreads, or unobservable inputs. Unobservable inputs may be based on
managements judgment, assumptions and estimates related to credit quality, liquidity, interest
rates and other relevant inputs.
Valuation adjustments, such as those pertaining to counterparty and Keys own credit quality and
liquidity, may be necessary to ensure that assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value.
Credit valuation adjustments are made when market pricing is not indicative of the counterpartys
credit quality. Most classes of derivative contracts are valued using internally-developed models
based on market-standard derivative pricing conventions, which rely primarily on observable market
inputs, such as interest rate yield curves and volatilities. Market convention implies a credit
rating of double-A equivalent in the pricing of derivative contracts, which assumes all
counterparties have the same creditworthiness. In determining the fair value of derivatives,
management applies cash collateral and/or a default reserve to reflect the credit quality of the
counterparty.
Liquidity valuation adjustments are made when management is unable to observe recent market
transactions for identical or similar instruments. Management adjusts the fair value to reflect
the uncertainty in the pricing and trading of the instrument. Liquidity valuation adjustments are
based on the following factors:
¨ |
|
the amount of time since the last relevant valuation; |
|
¨ |
|
whether there is an actual trade or relevant external quote available at the measurement date; and |
|
¨ |
|
volatility associated with the primary pricing components. |
Key has various controls in place to ensure that fair value measurements are accurate and
appropriate. These controls include:
¨ |
|
an independent review and approval of valuation models; |
|
¨ |
|
a detailed review of profit and loss conducted on a regular basis; and |
|
¨ |
|
validation of valuation model components against benchmark data and similar products, where possible. |
Any changes to valuation methodologies are reviewed by management to ensure they are relevant and
justified. Valuation methodologies are refined as more market-based data becomes available.
34
Fair Value Hierarchy
SFAS No. 157 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for determining fair value that is based
on the transparency of the inputs used in the valuation process. The inputs used in determining
fair value in each of the three levels of the hierarchy are as follows:
¨ |
|
Level 1. Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
|
¨ |
|
Level 2. Either: (i) quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities; (ii) observable inputs, such as interest
rates or yield curves; or (iii) inputs derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. |
|
¨ |
|
Level 3. Unobservable inputs. |
The hierarchy gives the highest ranking to Level 1 inputs and the lowest ranking to Level 3 inputs.
The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety
falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the overall fair value
measurement.
Qualitative Disclosures of Valuation Techniques
Loans. Loans recorded as trading account assets are valued based on market spreads for identical
or similar assets. Generally, these loans are classified as Level 2 since the fair value recorded
is based on observable market data. Key corroborates these inputs periodically through a pricing
service, which obtains data about actual transactions in the marketplace for identical or similar
assets.
Securities (trading and available for sale). Where quoted prices are available in an active
market, securities are classified as Level 1. Level 1 instruments include highly liquid government
bonds, securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and exchange-traded equity securities. If quoted
prices are not available, management determines fair value using pricing models, quoted prices of
similar securities or discounted cash flows. These instruments include assets such as municipal
bonds and certain agency collateralized mortgage obligations and are classified as Level 2. In
certain cases where there is limited activity in the market for a particular instrument,
assumptions must be made to determine their fair value. Such instruments include certain
mortgage-backed securities, certain commercial paper and restricted stock, and are classified as
Level 3.
Private equity and mezzanine investments. Valuations of private equity and mezzanine investments,
held primarily within Keys Real Estate Capital and Corporate Banking Services line of business,
are based primarily on managements judgment due to the lack of readily determinable fair values,
inherent illiquidity and the long-term nature of these assets. These investments are initially
valued based upon the transaction price. The carrying amount is then adjusted upward or downward
based upon the estimated future cash flows associated with the investments. Factors used in
determining future cash flows include, but are not limited to, the cost of build-out, future
selling prices, current market outlook and operating performance of the particular investment. The
valuation of private equity and mezzanine investments is classified as Level 3.
Principal investments. Valuations of principal investments, made by KPP, are based on the
underlying investments of the fund. In the case of equity securities where readily available
market quotes exist, those market quotes are utilized, and the related investments are classified
as Level 1. Most of KPPs investments are in private companies without readily available market
data. For these investments, the inputs are classified as Level 3 and are used in valuation
methodologies such as discounted cash flows, price/earnings ratios, and multiples of earnings
before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization.
35
Derivatives. Exchange-traded derivatives are valued using quoted prices and, therefore, are
classified as Level 1. Only a few types of derivatives are exchange-traded; thus, the majority of
Keys derivative positions are valued using internally-developed models that use observable market
inputs. These derivative contracts are classified as Level 2 and include interest rate swaps,
options and credit default swaps. Market convention implies a credit rating of double-A equivalent
in the pricing of derivative contracts, which assumes all counterparties have the same
creditworthiness. In order to reflect the actual exposure on Keys derivative contracts related to
both counterparty and Keys own creditworthiness, management records a fair value adjustment in the
form of a reserve. The credit component is valued on a counterparty-by-counterparty basis and
considers master netting agreements and collateral.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Assets and liabilities are considered to be fair valued on a recurring basis if fair value is
measured regularly (i.e., daily, weekly, monthly or quarterly). The following table shows Keys
assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Netting |
|
|
|
|
in millions |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Adjustments a |
|
|
Total |
|
|
ASSETS MEASURED ON A RECURRING BASIS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account assets |
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
753 |
|
|
$ |
724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,483 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
8,055 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,124 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,224 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
2,881 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
$ |
(1,462 |
) |
|
|
1,693 |
|
Accrued income and other assets |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
Total assets on a recurring basis at fair value |
|
$ |
375 |
|
|
$ |
11,814 |
|
|
$ |
1,927 |
|
|
$ |
(1,462 |
) |
|
$ |
12,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES MEASURED ON A RECURRING BASIS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank notes and other short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
352 |
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
2,164 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(1,797 |
) |
|
|
637 |
|
Accrued expense and other liabilities |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
Total liabilities on a recurring basis at fair value |
|
$ |
286 |
|
|
$ |
2,548 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(1,797 |
) |
|
$ |
1,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Netting adjustments represent the amounts recorded to convert Keys derivative assets and
liabilities from a gross basis to a net basis in conjunction with Keys January 1, 2008,
adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 39, Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts,
and FASB Staff Position FIN 39-1, Amendment of FASB Interpretation 39. The net basis takes
into account the impact of master netting agreements which allow Key to settle all derivative
contracts with a single counterparty
on a net basis and to offset the net derivative position with the related cash collateral. |
Changes in Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
The following table shows the change in the fair values of Keys Level 3 financial instruments for
the six months ended June 30, 2008. Classification in Level 3 is based on the significance of
unobservable inputs relative to the overall fair value measurement of the instrument. In addition
to unobservable inputs, Level 3 instruments also may have inputs that are observable within the
market. Management mitigates the credit risk, interest rate risk and risk of loss related to many
of these Level 3 instruments through the use of securities and derivative positions classified as
Level 1 or Level 2. Level 1 or Level 2 instruments are not included in the following table;
therefore, the gains or losses shown do not include the impact of Keys risk management activities
related to these Level 3 instruments.
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Trading |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account |
|
|
Available |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Derivative |
|
in millions |
|
Assets |
|
|
for Sale |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Instruments a |
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
338 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
1,161 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
(Losses) gains: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
(38 |
) b |
|
|
1 |
c |
|
|
1 |
d |
|
|
2 |
b |
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements |
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
724 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
1,191 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (losses) gains included in earnings |
|
$ |
(29 |
) b |
|
$ |
(1 |
) c |
|
$ |
(43 |
) d |
|
$ |
2 |
b |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Amount represents Level 3 derivative assets less Level 3 derivative liabilities. |
|
(b) |
|
Realized and unrealized gains and losses on trading account assets and derivative
instruments are reported in
investment banking and capital markets income on the income statement. |
|
(c) |
|
Unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale are reported in net
securities (losses) gains on the income
statement. |
|
(d) |
|
Other investments consist of principal investments, and private equity and mezzanine
investments. Realized and
unrealized gains and losses on principal investments are reported in net (losses) gains
from principal investments on the
income statement. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on private equity and
mezzanine investments are
reported in investment banking and capital markets income on the income statement. |
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
Assets and liabilities are considered to be fair valued on a nonrecurring basis if the fair value
measurement of the instrument does not necessarily result in a change in the amount recorded on the
balance sheet. Generally, nonrecurring valuation is the result of the application of other
accounting pronouncements which require assets or liabilities to be assessed for impairment or
recorded at the lower of cost or fair value. The following table presents Keys assets measured at
fair value on a nonrecurring basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in millions |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
ASSETS MEASURED ON A NONRECURRING BASIS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
Accrued income and other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
Total assets on a nonrecurring basis at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
783 |
|
|
$ |
787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Through Keys quarterly analysis of its commercial loan portfolio, management determined that
certain adjustments were necessary to record the portfolio at the lower of cost or fair value in
accordance with GAAP. While some loans were impaired as a result of current market conditions,
other loans recovered some of the value that was previously written down. After adjustments, these
loans totaled $368 million at June 30, 2008. Valuation of these loans is performed using an
internal model which relies on market data from sales of similar assets, including credit spreads,
interest rate curves and risk profiles, as well as Keys own assumptions about the exit market for
the loans. The valuation methodology employed is based on Level 3 inputs. Keys loans held for
sale, which are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, also include the $384 million of
commercial real estate loans transferred from the loan portfolio to held-for-sale status in June
2008. The fair value of these loans was measured using nonbinding broker quotes obtained through a
third party.
37
Other real estate owned and other repossessed properties are valued based on appraisals and
third-party price opinions, less estimated selling costs. Assets that are acquired through, or in
lieu of, loan foreclosures are recorded as held for sale initially at the lower of the loan balance
or fair value upon the date of foreclosure. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are updated
periodically, and the assets may be marked down further, reflecting a new cost basis. These
assets, which totaled $18 million at June 30, 2008, are considered to be nonrecurring items in the
fair value hierarchy.
Current market conditions, including lower prepayments, interest rates and expected recovery rates
have impacted Keys modeling assumptions pertaining to education lending-related servicing rights
and residual interests, and consequently resulted in write-downs of these instruments. These
instruments are included in accrued income and other assets and securities available for sale
respectively, in the preceding table.
38
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Shareholders and Board of Directors
KeyCorp
We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheets of KeyCorp and subsidiaries (Key) as
of June 30, 2008 and 2007, and the related condensed consolidated statements of income, for the
three- and six-month periods then ended, and the condensed consolidated statement of changes in
shareholders equity and cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. These
financial statements are the responsibility of Keys management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying
analytical procedures, and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the
expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do
not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the
condensed consolidated interim financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Key as of December 31, 2007, and
the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for
the year then ended not presented herein, and in our report dated February 22, 2008, we expressed
an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information
set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2007, is
fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which
it has been derived.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Cleveland, Ohio
August 7, 2008
39
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Introduction
This section generally reviews the financial condition and results of operations of KeyCorp and its
subsidiaries for the quarterly and year-to-date periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. Some tables
may include additional periods to comply with disclosure requirements or to illustrate trends in
greater depth. When you read this discussion, you should also refer to the consolidated financial
statements and related notes that appear on pages 3 through 38. A description of Keys business is
included under the heading Description of Business on page 14 of Keys 2007 Annual Report to
Shareholders. This description does not reflect the reorganization within some of Keys lines of
business that took effect on January 1, 2008. For a current description of Keys lines of
business, see Note 4 (Line of Business Results), which begins on
page 14.
Terminology
This report contains some shortened names and industry-specific terms. We want to explain some of
these terms at the outset so you can better understand the discussion that follows.
|
|
|
¨
|
|
KeyCorp refers solely to the parent holding company. |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
KeyBank refers to KeyCorps subsidiary bank, KeyBank National Association. |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Key refers to the consolidated entity consisting of KeyCorp and its subsidiaries. |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
In November 2006, Key sold the subprime mortgage loan portfolio held by the Champion Mortgage finance business and
announced a separate agreement to sell Champions origination platform. As a result of these actions, Key has
accounted for this business as a discontinued operation. We use the phrase continuing operations in this document to
mean all of Keys business other than Champion. Key completed the sale of Champions origination platform in February
2007. |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Key engages in capital markets activities primarily through business conducted by the National Banking group. These
activities encompass a variety of products and services. Among other things, Key trades securities as a dealer, enters
into derivative contracts (both to accommodate clients financing needs and for proprietary trading purposes), and
conducts transactions in foreign currencies (both to accommodate clients needs and to benefit from fluctuations in
exchange rates). |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
All earnings per share data included in this discussion are presented on a diluted basis, which takes into account all
common shares outstanding as well as potential common shares that could result from the conversion of preferred stock
to common shares, the exercise of outstanding stock options and other stock awards. Some of the financial information
tables also include basic earnings per share, which takes into account only common shares outstanding. |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
For regulatory purposes, capital is divided into two classes. Federal regulations prescribe that at least one-half of
a bank or bank holding companys total risk-based capital must qualify as Tier 1. Both total and
Tier 1 capital serve
as bases for several measures of capital adequacy, which is an important indicator of financial stability and
condition. You will find a more detailed explanation of total and Tier 1 capital and how they are calculated in the
section entitled Capital, which begins on page 72. |
Forward-looking statements
This report may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements about Keys long-term goals, financial
condition, results of operations, earnings, levels of net loan charge-offs and nonperforming
assets, interest rate exposure and profitability. These statements usually can be identified by the
use of forward-looking
40
language such as our goal, our objective, our plan, will likely result, expects, plans,
anticipates, intends, projects, believes, estimates or other similar words, expressions
or conditional verbs such as will, would, could and should.
Forward-looking statements express managements current expectations, forecasts of future events or
long-term goals and, by their nature, are subject to assumptions, risks and uncertainties. Although
management believes that the expectations, forecasts and goals reflected in these forward-looking
statements are reasonable, actual results could differ materially for a variety of reasons,
including the following factors:
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Interest rates could change more quickly or more significantly than management expects, which may have an adverse
effect on Keys financial results. |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Trade, monetary and fiscal policies of various governmental bodies may affect the economic environment in which Key
operates, as well as its financial condition and results of operations. |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Changes in the stock markets, public debt markets and other capital markets, including continued disruption in the
fixed income markets, could adversely affect Keys ability to raise capital or other funding for liquidity and business
purposes, as well as its revenues from client-based underwriting, investment banking and other capital markets-driven
businesses. |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Recent problems in the housing markets, including issues related to the Federal National Mortgage Association and the
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, and related conditions in the financial markets, or other issues, such as the
high price of oil or other commodities, could cause further deterioration in general economic conditions, or in the
condition of the local economies or industries in which Key has significant operations or assets, and, among other
things, materially impact credit quality in existing portfolios and/or Keys ability to generate loans in the future. |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Increasing interest rates or further weakening economic conditions could constrain borrowers ability to repay
outstanding loans or diminish the value of the collateral securing those loans. Additionally, the allowance for loan
losses may be insufficient if the estimates and judgments management used to establish that allowance prove to be
inaccurate. |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Increased competitive pressure among financial services companies may adversely affect Keys ability to market its
products and services. |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
It could take Key longer than anticipated to implement strategic initiatives, including those designed to grow revenue
or manage expenses; Key may be unable to implement certain initiatives; or the initiatives may be unsuccessful. |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Acquisitions and dispositions of assets, business units or affiliates could adversely affect Key in ways that
management has not anticipated. |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Key may experience operational or risk management failures due to technological or other factors. |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Changes in accounting principles or in tax laws, rules and regulations could have an adverse effect on Keys financial
results or its capital. |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Key may become subject to new legal obligations or liabilities, or the unfavorable resolution of pending litigation may
have an adverse effect on its financial results or its capital. |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Key may become subject to new or heightened regulatory practices, requirements or expectations which may impede its
profitability. |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Terrorist activities or military actions could disrupt the economy and the general business climate, which may have an
adverse effect on Keys financial results or condition and that of its borrowers. |
41
Long-term goals
Keys long-term financial goals are to grow its earnings per common share and achieve a return on
average equity, each at or above the respective median of its peer group. The strategy for
achieving these goals is described under the heading Corporate Strategy on page 16 of Keys 2007
Annual Report to Shareholders.
Economic overview
During the second quarter of 2008, the U.S. consumer faced inflationary pressures and a weakening
labor market. Consumer prices in June 2008 rose 5.0% from June 2007, up from a 4.0% annual
increase in March 2008. Energy costs increased by 24.7% from the same month one year ago, as the
price of oil rose from $102 per barrel at March 31, 2008, to $140 per barrel at June 30, 2008.
Employment also softened during the second quarter as the economy lost 191,000 jobs, which brought
the number of jobs lost since December 2007 to 438,000. The average unemployment rate for the
quarter rose to 5.3%, compared to the first quarter average of 4.9% and the 2007 average of 4.6%.
Although consumer confidence dropped to a 28-year low, the consumer did show signs of resiliency,
due in part to tax rebate checks that the government began to disburse in early May. Consumer
spending during the second quarter rose at an average monthly rate of .6%, compared to an average
monthly rate of .3% in the first quarter and .5% in 2007.
The downward trend in real estate values and home sales continued into the second quarter of 2008.
June new home sales were down 33% and existing home sales were down 15% from the respective sales
levels reported for the same month last year, while the median price of existing homes fell by more
than 6%. The number of homes available for sale was further elevated by home foreclosures, which
rose by 53% from the number of foreclosures experienced in June 2007. As of June 30, an estimated
one out of every 501 homes was in some stage of foreclosure. Decreasing home sales and a rising
inventory of homes for sale slowed the pace of new home construction, as housing starts and
building permits were down more than 20% from June 2007.
Write-downs caused by distressed real estate values and increasing loan losses further strained
already diminished capital levels at financial institutions, forcing many to raise additional
capital, often at substantially higher costs than experienced in recent years. For regional
banking institutions such as Key, access to the capital markets for unsecured term debt continues
to be severely restricted, with investors requiring historically wide spreads over risk-free U.S.
Treasury obligations to make new investments.
In response to the continued disruptions in the credit markets, softening labor markets, further
housing declines and weak economic growth, during the second quarter of 2008 the Federal Reserve
lowered the federal funds target rate to 2.00% from 2.25%. However, increases occurred in most
national money market interest rates as the market anticipated that the Federal Reserve may
eventually have to increase interest rates to address the increasing risk of inflation. The
benchmark two-year Treasury yield increased to 2.62% at June 30, 2008, from 1.59% at March 31,
2008. The ten-year Treasury yield began the quarter at 3.41% and closed the second quarter at
3.97%.
Demographics. The extent to which Keys business has been affected by continued volatility and
weakness in the housing market is directly related to the state of the economy in the regions in
which its two major business groups, Community Banking and National Banking, operate.
Keys Community Banking group serves consumers and small to mid-sized businesses by offering a
variety of deposit, investment, lending and wealth management products and services. These
products and services are provided through a 14-state branch network organized into four geographic
regions as defined by management: Northwest, Rocky Mountains, Great Lakes and Northeast. Figure 1
shows the geographic diversity of the Community Banking groups average core deposits, commercial
loans and home equity loans.
42
Figure 1. Community Banking Geographic Diversity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rocky |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dollars in millions |
|
Northwest |
|
|
Mountains |
|
|
Great Lakes |
|
|
Northeast |
|
|
Nonregion a |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Average core deposits |
|
$ |
9,662 |
|
|
$ |
3,523 |
|
|
$ |
14,112 |
|
|
$ |
13,069 |
|
|
$ |
1,615 |
|
|
$ |
41,981 |
|
Percent of total |
|
|
23.0 |
% |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
33.6 |
% |
|
|
31.1 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average commercial loans |
|
$ |
4,264 |
|
|
$ |
2,095 |
|
|
$ |
4,860 |
|
|
$ |
3,175 |
|
|
$ |
1,362 |
|
|
$ |
15,756 |
|
Percent of total |
|
|
27.1 |
% |
|
|
13.3 |
% |
|
|
30.8 |
% |
|
|
20.2 |
% |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average home equity loans |
|
$ |
2,777 |
|
|
$ |
1,312 |
|
|
$ |
2,917 |
|
|
$ |
2,632 |
|
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
$ |
9,766 |
|
Percent of total |
|
|
28.4 |
% |
|
|
13.4 |
% |
|
|
29.9 |
% |
|
|
27.0 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents core deposit, commercial loan and home equity loan products centrally managed
outside of the four Community Banking regions. |
Keys National Banking group includes those corporate and consumer business units that operate
nationally, within and beyond the 14-state branch network, as well as internationally. The
specific products and services offered by the National Banking group are described in Note 4 (Line
of Business Results), which begins on page 14.
The diversity of Keys commercial real estate lending business based on industry type and location
is shown in Figure 19 on page 65. The homebuilder loan portfolio within the National Banking group
has been adversely affected by the downturn in the U.S. housing market. As a result of
deteriorating market conditions in the residential properties segment of Keys commercial real
estate construction portfolio, principally in Florida and southern California, Key has experienced
a significant increase in the level of its nonperforming assets since mid-2007. As previously
reported, during the second quarter of 2008, Key initiated a process to reduce its exposure in this
segment of its loan portfolio through the planned sale of certain loans. Although Keys actions in
this regard resulted in additional net charge-offs and a higher provision for loan losses for the
second quarter, the sale of these loans, once closed, is expected to reduce the level of Keys
total nonperforming assets. Management anticipates that the majority of the loan sales will close
in the third quarter. Additional information pertaining to the planned loan sales is included in
the Credit risk management section, which begins on page 81.
In recent quarters, results for the National Banking group have also been affected adversely by
volatility in the capital markets, leading to declines in the market values at which certain assets
(primarily commercial real estate loans and securities held for sale or trading) are recorded.
During the first quarter of 2008, management placed hedges on Keys remaining previously unhedged
commercial real estate mortgage loans held for sale to protect against further declines in market
values that may result from changes in credit spreads and other market-driven factors. These
actions, along with improved execution and market conditions, contributed to a more favorable
performance from Keys capital markets-driven businesses in the second quarter of 2008.
During the second quarter of 2008, the banking industry, including Key, continued to experience
commercial and industrial loan growth, due in part to increased reliance by borrowers on commercial
lines of credit in response to the challenging economic environment.
43
Critical accounting policies and estimates
Keys business is dynamic and complex. Consequently, management must exercise judgment in choosing
and applying accounting policies and methodologies in many areas. These choices are critical; not
only are they necessary to comply with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP); they
also reflect managements view of the appropriate way to record and report Keys overall financial
performance. All accounting policies are important, and all policies described in Note 1 (Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies), which begins on page 65 of Keys 2007 Annual Report to
Shareholders, should be reviewed for a greater understanding of how Keys financial performance is
recorded and reported.
In managements opinion, some accounting policies are more likely than others to have a significant
effect on Keys financial results and to expose those results to potentially greater volatility.
These policies apply to areas of relatively greater business importance, or require management to
exercise judgment and to make assumptions and estimates that affect amounts reported in the
financial statements. Because these assumptions and estimates are based on current circumstances,
they may change over time or prove to be inaccurate.
Management relies heavily on the use of judgment, assumptions and estimates to make a number of
core decisions, including accounting for the allowance for loan losses; loan securitizations;
contingent liabilities, guarantees and income taxes; derivatives and related hedging activities;
and assets and liabilities that involve valuation methodologies. A brief discussion of each of
these areas appears on pages 17 through 19 of Keys 2007 Annual Report to Shareholders.
Information related to the results of Keys goodwill impairment testing conducted as of June 30,
2008, is included in Note 1 (Basis of Presentation) under the heading Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets on page 7.
Effective January 1, 2008, Key adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No.
157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. In the absence of quoted market
prices, management determines the fair value of Keys assets and liabilities using
internally-developed models which are based on managements judgment, assumptions and estimates
regarding credit quality, liquidity, interest rates and other relevant inputs. Keys adoption of
this accounting guidance and the process used in determining fair values is more fully described in
Note 1 (Basis of Presentation) under the heading Fair Value Measurements on page 8, and Note 15
(Fair Value Measurements), which begins on page 34.
At
June 30, 2008, $12.7 billion, or 12%, of Keys total assets were measured at fair value on a
recurring basis. Approximately 96% of these assets were classified as Level 1 or Level 2 within
the fair value hierarchy. At June 30, 2008, $1.0 billion,
or 1%, of Keys total liabilities were
measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Substantially all of these liabilities were
classified as Level 1 or Level 2.
At
June 30, 2008, $787 million, or 1%, of Keys total assets were measured at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis. Less than 1% of these assets were classified as Level 1 or Level 2. At June
30, 2008, there were no liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.
Highlights of Keys Performance
Financial performance
For the second quarter of 2008, Key recorded a loss of $1.126 billion from continuing operations,
or $2.70 per common share. These results compare to income from continuing operations of $337
million, or $.85 per diluted common share, for the second quarter of 2007, and $218 million, or
$.54 per diluted common share, for the first quarter of 2008.
44
Keys results for both the second and first quarters of 2008 include additional charges associated
with certain leveraged lease financing transactions being challenged by the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS).
Second quarter results include after-tax charges of $1.011 billion, or $2.43 per common share,
resulting from a previously announced adverse federal court decision on the tax treatment of a
Service Contract Lease transaction a decision that the company has appealed.
During the first quarter of 2008, Key increased its tax reserves for certain lease in, lease out
(LILO) transactions and recalculated its lease income in accordance with prescribed accounting
standards, resulting in after-tax charges of $38 million, or $.10 per common share.
Excluding the lease financing charges recorded in the first and second quarters, Key had a loss
from continuing operations of $115 million, or $.28 per common share, for the second quarter of
2008, compared to income from continuing operations of $337 million, or $.85 per diluted common
share, for the second quarter of 2007, and $256 million, or $.64 per diluted common share, for the
first quarter of 2008.
For the first six months of 2008, Key reported a loss from continuing operations of $908 million,
or $2.23 per common share. Adjusting for the lease financing charges, Key had income from
continuing operations of $141 million, or $.34 per diluted common share, compared to $695 million,
or $1.74 per diluted common share, for the first half of 2007.
Key reported a net loss of $1.126 billion, or $2.70 per common share, for the second quarter of
2008, compared to net income of $334 million, or $.84 per diluted common share, for the second
quarter of 2007, and $218 million, or $.54 per diluted common share, for the first quarter of 2008.
For the first half of 2008, Key reported a net loss of $908 million, or $2.23 per common share,
compared to net income of $684 million, or $1.71 per diluted common share, for the same period last
year.
Figure 2 shows Keys continuing and discontinued operating results and related performance ratios
for comparative quarters and the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
Figure 2. Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
dollars in millions, except per share amounts |
|
6-30-08 |
|
|
3-31-08 |
|
|
6-30-07 |
|
|
6-30-08 |
|
|
6-30-07 |
|
|
SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(1,126 |
) |
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
$ |
337 |
|
|
$ |
(908 |
) |
|
$ |
695 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of
taxes a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(1,126 |
) |
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
$ |
(908 |
) |
|
$ |
684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income applicable to common shares |
|
$ |
(1,126 |
) |
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
$ |
(908 |
) |
|
$ |
684 |
|
|
PER COMMON SHARE ASSUMING DILUTION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(2.70 |
) |
|
$ |
.54 |
|
|
$ |
.85 |
|
|
$ |
(2.23 |
) |
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.03 |
) |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(2.70 |
) |
|
$ |
.54 |
|
|
$ |
.84 |
|
|
$ |
(2.23 |
) |
|
$ |
1.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PERFORMANCE RATIOS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average total assets |
|
|
(4.38 |
)% |
|
|
.85 |
% |
|
|
1.45 |
% |
|
|
(1.77 |
)% |
|
|
1.51 |
% |
Return on average common equity |
|
|
(53.35 |
) |
|
|
10.38 |
|
|
|
17.66 |
|
|
|
(21.57 |
) |
|
|
18.35 |
|
Return on average total equity |
|
|
(52.56 |
) |
|
|
10.38 |
|
|
|
17.66 |
|
|
|
(21.40 |
) |
|
|
18.35 |
|
From consolidated operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average total assets |
|
|
(4.38 |
)% |
|
|
.85 |
% |
|
|
1.43 |
% |
|
|
(1.77 |
)% |
|
|
1.49 |
% |
Return on average common equity |
|
|
(53.35 |
) |
|
|
10.38 |
|
|
|
17.50 |
|
|
|
(21.57 |
) |
|
|
18.06 |
|
Return on average total equity |
|
|
(52.56 |
) |
|
|
10.38 |
|
|
|
17.50 |
|
|
|
(21.40 |
) |
|
|
18.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Key sold the subprime mortgage loan portfolio held by the Champion Mortgage finance business
in November 2006,
and completed the sale of Champions origination platform in February 2007. As a result of
these actions, Key has
accounted for this business as a discontinued operation. |
In addition to the lease financing charges, Keys results for the second quarter of 2008 were
adversely affected by a higher provision for loan losses. The increased provision resulted from
the companys previously reported efforts to reduce its exposure to the residential properties
segment of its commercial real estate construction loan portfolio through the planned sale of
assets, and actions taken to bolster the
45
allowance for loan losses. Keys provision for loan
losses for the second quarter of 2008 was $647 million, compared to $53 million for the same period
one year ago. The current quarters provision exceeded net loan charge-offs by $123 million and
increased Keys reserve for loan losses to $1.421 billion, or 1.87% of period-end loans.
Additional information pertaining to the planned sale of assets is presented in the section
entitled Credit risk management, which begins on page 81.
Key took aggressive steps in the second quarter to further strengthen its capital position, due in
large part to the impact of the lease accounting charges. Including shares issued in July under an
over allotment option, the company raised $1.74 billion of additional capital through the issuance
of preferred stock and common shares. Further, Keys Board of Directors announced its intention to
reduce the dividend on Keys common shares by 50% to an annualized dividend of $.75 per share
commencing with the dividend payable in the third quarter of 2008. Management believes these
actions will position the company to respond to future business opportunities and are prudent steps
in light of the challenging economic environment.
During the second quarter of 2008, Key experienced positive trends in several of its fee-based
businesses, most notably trust and investment services, and the investment banking, syndications
and capital markets businesses. Expenses continued to be well-controlled and the company
benefited from the actions taken in the first quarter to reduce exposure to future market
volatility. Key also continued to gain traction in its Community Banking model. While working
through this difficult credit cycle, management intends to continue to focus on Keys relationship
business model, carefully manage expenses and upgrade delivery platforms to maintain Keys
readiness to respond to business opportunities as they emerge.
As shown in Figure 3, the comparability of Keys earnings for the current, prior and year-ago
quarters is affected by several significant items.
Figure 3. Significant Items Affecting the Comparability of Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
Pre-tax |
|
|
After-tax |
|
|
Impact |
|
|
Pre-tax |
|
|
After-tax |
|
|
Impact |
|
|
Pre-tax |
|
|
After-tax |
|
|
Impact |
|
in millions, except per share amounts |
|
Amount |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
on EPS |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
on EPS |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
on EPS |
|
|
Charge related to leveraged lease tax litigation |
|
$ |
(359 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,011 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.43 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
|
$ |
(.10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain from redemption of Visa Inc. shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on loan and
securities portfolios held for sale or trading |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
.09 |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(.20 |
) |
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
.08 |
|
Litigation reserve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(.07 |
) |
Gains related to MasterCard Incorporated shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
EPS = Earnings per diluted common share |
Events leading to the recognition of the items presented in Figure 3, as well as other factors that
contributed to the changes in Keys revenue and expense components from those reported for the
second quarter of 2007, are reviewed in detail throughout the remainder of the Managements
Discussion and Analysis section.
46
Keys financial performance for each of the past five quarters is summarized in Figure 4.
Figure 4. Selected Financial Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
dollars in millions, except per share amounts |
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
FOR THE PERIOD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
880 |
|
|
$ |
1,354 |
|
|
$ |
1,447 |
|
|
$ |
1,434 |
|
|
$ |
1,395 |
|
|
$ |
2,234 |
|
|
$ |
2,763 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
1,398 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
358 |
a |
|
|
713 |
a |
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
1,071 |
a |
|
|
1,365 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
834 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
1,083 |
|
|
|
1,303 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
896 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
1,513 |
|
|
|
1,599 |
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
(515 |
) |
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
972 |
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
|
(1,126 |
) |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
(908 |
) |
|
|
695 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(1,126 |
) a |
|
|
218 |
a |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
(908 |
) a |
|
|
684 |
|
Net (loss) income applicable to common shares |
|
|
(1,126 |
) |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
(908 |
) |
|
|
684 |
|
|
PER COMMON SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(2.70 |
) |
|
$ |
.55 |
|
|
$ |
.06 |
|
|
$ |
.58 |
|
|
$ |
.86 |
|
|
$ |
(2.23 |
) |
|
$ |
1.76 |
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.01 |
|
|
|
(.03 |
) |
|
|
(.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.03 |
) |
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(2.70 |
) |
|
|
.55 |
|
|
|
.06 |
|
|
|
.54 |
|
|
|
.85 |
|
|
|
(2.23 |
) |
|
|
1.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations assuming dilution |
|
|
(2.70 |
) |
|
|
.54 |
|
|
|
.06 |
|
|
|
.57 |
|
|
|
.85 |
|
|
|
(2.23 |
) |
|
|
1.74 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations assuming dilution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.01 |
|
|
|
(.03 |
) |
|
|
(.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.03 |
) |
Net (loss) income assuming dilution |
|
|
(2.70 |
) a |
|
|
.54 |
a |
|
|
.06 |
|
|
|
.54 |
|
|
|
.84 |
|
|
|
(2.23 |
) a |
|
|
1.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
.375 |
|
|
|
.375 |
|
|
|
.365 |
|
|
|
.365 |
|
|
|
.365 |
|
|
|
.75 |
|
|
|
.73 |
|
Book value at period end |
|
|
16.59 |
|
|
|
21.48 |
|
|
|
19.92 |
|
|
|
20.12 |
|
|
|
19.78 |
|
|
|
16.59 |
|
|
|
19.78 |
|
Tangible book value at period end |
|
|
13.00 |
|
|
|
17.07 |
|
|
|
16.39 |
|
|
|
16.76 |
|
|
|
16.41 |
|
|
|
13.00 |
|
|
|
16.41 |
|
Market price: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
|
26.12 |
|
|
|
27.23 |
|
|
|
34.05 |
|
|
|
37.09 |
|
|
|
38.96 |
|
|
|
27.23 |
|
|
|
39.90 |
|
Low |
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
19.00 |
|
|
|
21.04 |
|
|
|
31.38 |
|
|
|
34.15 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
34.15 |
|
Close |
|
|
10.98 |
|
|
|
21.95 |
|
|
|
23.45 |
|
|
|
32.33 |
|
|
|
34.33 |
|
|
|
10.98 |
|
|
|
34.33 |
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (000) |
|
|
416,629 |
|
|
|
399,121 |
|
|
|
388,940 |
|
|
|
389,319 |
|
|
|
392,045 |
|
|
|
407,875 |
|
|
|
394,944 |
|
Weighted-average common shares and potential
common shares outstanding (000) |
|
|
416,629 |
|
|
|
399,769 |
|
|
|
389,911 |
|
|
|
393,164 |
|
|
|
396,918 |
|
|
|
407,875 |
|
|
|
400,180 |
|
|
AT PERIOD END |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
75,855 |
|
|
$ |
76,444 |
|
|
$ |
70,823 |
|
|
$ |
68,999 |
|
|
$ |
66,692 |
|
|
$ |
75,855 |
|
|
$ |
66,692 |
|
Earning assets |
|
|
89,893 |
|
|
|
89,719 |
|
|
|
86,557 |
|
|
|
84,838 |
|
|
|
82,161 |
|
|
|
89,893 |
|
|
|
82,161 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
101,544 |
|
|
|
101,492 |
|
|
|
98,228 |
|
|
|
96,137 |
|
|
|
92,967 |
|
|
|
101,544 |
|
|
|
92,967 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
64,396 |
|
|
|
64,702 |
|
|
|
63,099 |
|
|
|
63,714 |
|
|
|
60,599 |
|
|
|
64,396 |
|
|
|
60,599 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
15,106 |
|
|
|
14,337 |
|
|
|
11,957 |
|
|
|
11,549 |
|
|
|
12,581 |
|
|
|
15,106 |
|
|
|
12,581 |
|
Common shareholders equity |
|
|
8,056 |
|
|
|
8,592 |
|
|
|
7,746 |
|
|
|
7,820 |
|
|
|
7,701 |
|
|
|
8,056 |
|
|
|
7,701 |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
8,706 |
|
|
|
8,592 |
|
|
|
7,746 |
|
|
|
7,820 |
|
|
|
7,701 |
|
|
|
8,706 |
|
|
|
7,701 |
|
|
PERFORMANCE RATIOS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average total assets |
|
|
(4.38 |
)% |
|
|
.85 |
% |
|
|
.09 |
% |
|
|
.93 |
% |
|
|
1.45 |
% |
|
|
(1.77 |
)% |
|
|
1.51 |
% |
Return on average common equity |
|
|
(53.35 |
) |
|
|
10.38 |
|
|
|
1.11 |
|
|
|
11.50 |
|
|
|
17.66 |
|
|
|
(21.57 |
) |
|
|
18.35 |
|
Return on average total equity |
|
|
(52.56 |
) |
|
|
10.38 |
|
|
|
1.11 |
|
|
|
11.50 |
|
|
|
17.66 |
|
|
|
(21.40 |
) |
|
|
18.35 |
|
Net interest margin (taxable equivalent) |
|
|
(.44 |
) |
|
|
3.14 |
|
|
|
3.48 |
|
|
|
3.40 |
|
|
|
3.46 |
|
|
|
1.35 |
|
|
|
3.48 |
|
From consolidated operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average total assets |
|
|
(4.38 |
) % a |
|
|
.85 |
% a |
|
|
.10 |
% |
|
|
.88 |
% |
|
|
1.43 |
% |
|
|
(1.77 |
) % a |
|
|
1.49 |
% |
Return on average common equity |
|
|
(53.35 |
) a |
|
|
10.38 |
a |
|
|
1.26 |
|
|
|
10.79 |
|
|
|
17.50 |
|
|
|
(21.57 |
) a |
|
|
18.06 |
|
Return on average total equity |
|
|
(52.56 |
) a |
|
|
10.38 |
a |
|
|
1.26 |
|
|
|
10.79 |
|
|
|
17.50 |
|
|
|
(21.40 |
) a |
|
|
18.06 |
|
Net interest margin (taxable equivalent) |
|
|
(.44 |
) a |
|
|
3.14 |
a |
|
|
3.48 |
|
|
|
3.40 |
|
|
|
3.46 |
|
|
|
1.35 |
a |
|
|
3.49 |
|
|
CAPITAL RATIOS AT PERIOD END |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity to assets |
|
|
8.57 |
% |
|
|
8.47 |
% |
|
|
7.89 |
% |
|
|
8.13 |
% |
|
|
8.28 |
% |
|
|
8.57 |
% |
|
|
8.28 |
% |
Tangible equity to tangible assets |
|
|
6.98 |
|
|
|
6.85 |
|
|
|
6.58 |
|
|
|
6.87 |
|
|
|
6.97 |
|
|
|
6.98 |
|
|
|
6.97 |
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital |
|
|
8.53 |
|
|
|
8.33 |
|
|
|
7.44 |
|
|
|
7.94 |
|
|
|
8.14 |
|
|
|
8.53 |
|
|
|
8.14 |
|
Total risk-based capital |
|
|
12.41 |
|
|
|
12.34 |
|
|
|
11.38 |
|
|
|
11.76 |
|
|
|
12.15 |
|
|
|
12.41 |
|
|
|
12.15 |
|
Leverage |
|
|
9.34 |
|
|
|
9.15 |
|
|
|
8.39 |
|
|
|
8.96 |
|
|
|
9.11 |
|
|
|
9.34 |
|
|
|
9.11 |
|
|
TRUST AND BROKERAGE ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets under management |
|
$ |
80,998 |
|
|
$ |
80,453 |
|
|
$ |
85,442 |
|
|
$ |
88,100 |
|
|
$ |
85,592 |
|
|
$ |
80,998 |
|
|
$ |
85,592 |
|
Nonmanaged and brokerage assets |
|
|
29,905 |
|
|
|
30,532 |
|
|
|
33,918 |
|
|
|
33,273 |
|
|
|
33,485 |
|
|
|
29,905 |
|
|
|
33,485 |
|
|
OTHER DATA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average full-time equivalent employees |
|
|
18,164 |
|
|
|
18,426 |
|
|
|
18,500 |
|
|
|
18,567 |
|
|
|
18,888 |
|
|
|
18,295 |
|
|
|
19,342 |
|
Branches |
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
954 |
|
|
|
954 |
|
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
954 |
|
|
Acquisitions and divestitures completed by Key during the periods shown in this table may have had
a significant effect on Keys results, making it difficult to compare results from one period to
the next. Note 3 (Acquisitions and Divestitures), which begins
on page 12, contains specific information about the acquisitions and divestitures that Key
completed during 2007 and the first six months of 2008 to help in understanding how those
transactions may have impacted Keys financial condition and results of operations.
|
|
|
(a) |
|
See Figure 5 for computations of certain earnings data and performance ratios, excluding
charges related to the tax treatment of certain leveraged lease financing transactions
disallowed by the IRS. Figure 5 reconciles certain GAAP performance measures to the
corresponding non-GAAP measures and provides a basis for period-to-period comparisons. |
47
As a result of an adverse federal court decision on Keys tax treatment of a Service Contract Lease
transaction entered into by AWG Leasing Trust, in which Key is a partner, Key recorded after-tax
charges of $1.011 billion, or $2.43 per common share, during the second quarter of 2008.
Additionally, during the first quarter of 2008, Key increased its tax reserves for certain LILO
transactions and recalculated its lease income in accordance with prescribed accounting standards,
resulting in after-tax charges of $38 million, or $.10 per common share. Figure 5 below presents
computations of certain earnings data and performance ratios, excluding these charges (non-GAAP),
reconciles the GAAP performance measures to the corresponding non-GAAP measures and provides a
basis for period-to-period comparisons. Non-GAAP financial measures have inherent limitations, are
not required to be uniformly applied and are not audited. Non-GAAP financial measures should not
be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for analyses of results as reported under GAAP.
Figure 5. GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six |
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
months ended |
|
dollars in millions, except per share amounts |
|
|
|
6-30-08 |
|
|
3-31-08 |
|
|
6-30-08 |
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income (GAAP) |
|
A |
|
$ |
(1,126 |
) |
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
$ |
(908 |
) |
Charges related to leveraged lease tax litigation, after tax |
|
|
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
Net (loss) income, excluding charges related to leveraged lease tax litigation (non-GAAP) |
|
B |
|
$ |
(115 |
) |
|
$ |
256 |
|
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares and potential common shares outstanding (000) |
|
C |
|
|
416,629 |
|
|
|
399,769 |
|
|
|
407,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PER COMMON SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income assuming dilution (GAAP) |
|
A/C |
|
$ |
(2.70 |
) |
|
$ |
.54 |
|
|
$ |
(2.23 |
) |
Net (loss) income, excluding charges related to leveraged lease tax
litigation assuming dilution (non-GAAP) |
|
B/C |
|
|
(.28 |
) |
|
|
.64 |
|
|
|
.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PERFORMANCE RATIOS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average total assets: a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average total assets |
|
D |
|
$ |
103,290 |
|
|
$ |
103,356 |
|
|
$ |
103,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average total assets (GAAP) |
|
A/D |
|
|
(4.38 |
)% |
|
|
.85 |
% |
|
|
(1.77 |
)% |
Return on
average total assets, excluding charges related to leveraged lease tax litigation (non-GAAP) |
|
B/D |
|
|
(.45 |
) |
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average common equity: a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common equity |
|
E |
|
$ |
8,489 |
|
|
$ |
8,445 |
|
|
$ |
8,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average common equity (GAAP) |
|
A/E |
|
|
(53.35 |
)% |
|
|
10.38 |
% |
|
|
(21.57 |
)% |
Return on average common equity, excluding charges related to leveraged lease tax
litigation (non-GAAP) |
|
B/E |
|
|
(5.45 |
) |
|
|
12.19 |
|
|
|
3.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average total equity: a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average total equity |
|
F |
|
$ |
8,617 |
|
|
$ |
8,445 |
|
|
$ |
8,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average total equity (GAAP) |
|
A/F |
|
|
(52.56 |
)% |
|
|
10.38 |
% |
|
|
(21.40 |
)% |
Return on average total equity, excluding charges related to leveraged lease tax
litigation (non-GAAP) |
|
B/F |
|
|
(5.37 |
) |
|
|
12.19 |
|
|
|
3.32 |
|
|
NET INTEREST INCOME AND MARGIN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (GAAP) |
|
|
|
$ |
358 |
|
|
$ |
713 |
|
|
$ |
1,071 |
|
Charges related to leveraged lease tax litigation, pre-tax |
|
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
Net interest income, excluding charges related to leveraged lease tax
litigation (non-GAAP) |
|
|
|
$ |
717 |
|
|
$ |
716 |
|
|
$ |
1,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income/margin (TE): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest (loss) income (TE) (as reported) |
|
|
|
$ |
(100 |
) |
|
$ |
704 |
|
|
$ |
604 |
|
Charges related to leveraged lease tax litigation, pre-tax (TE) |
|
|
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
Net interest income, excluding charges related to leveraged lease tax
litigation (TE) (adjusted basis) |
|
|
|
$ |
738 |
|
|
$ |
738 |
|
|
$ |
1,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (TE) (as reported) a |
|
|
|
|
(.44 |
)% |
|
|
3.14 |
% |
|
|
1.35 |
% |
Impact of charges related to leveraged lease tax litigation, pre-tax (TE) a |
|
|
|
|
3.76 |
|
|
|
.15 |
|
|
|
1.95 |
|
|
Net interest margin, excluding charges related to leveraged lease tax
litigation (TE) (adjusted basis) a |
|
|
|
|
3.32 |
% |
|
|
3.29 |
% |
|
|
3.30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Income statement amount has been annualized in calculation of percentage. |
|
TE = Taxable Equivalent |
|
GAAP = U.S. generally accepted accounting principles |
48
Financial outlook
Although difficult to project in this turbulent economy, considering current and anticipated
conditions in the financial markets, the impact of the lease accounting adjustment and the
continuation of competitive pricing for deposits, management expects that in the second half of
2008 Key will experience:
|
|
|
¨
|
|
a taxable-equivalent net interest margin in the range of 3.15% to 3.20%; |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
stable to reduced loan balances; |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
a low single digit percentage increase in core deposits; |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
net loan charge-offs in the range of 1.20% to 1.60% of average loans; |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
a low single digit percentage increase in expenses; and |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
an effective tax rate of approximately 34% to 36% on a taxable-equivalent basis. This estimate includes an interest
accrual of approximately $32 million to $34 million per quarter related to disputed taxes on the leveraged lease
financing portfolio. |
Strategic developments
Management initiated a number of specific actions during 2008 and 2007 to support Keys corporate
strategy.
|
|
|
¨
|
|
On January 1, 2008, Key acquired U.S.B. Holding Co., Inc., the
holding company for Union State Bank, a 31-branch state-chartered
commercial bank headquartered in Orangeburg, New York. The
acquisition doubles Keys branch penetration in the attractive
Lower Hudson Valley area. Assets and deposits acquired in this
transaction were assigned to both the Community Banking and
National Banking groups. |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
On December 20, 2007, Key announced its decision to exit
dealer-originated home improvement lending activities, which
involve prime loans but are largely out-of-footprint. Key also
announced that it will cease offering Payroll Online services,
which are not of sufficient size to provide economies of scale to
compete profitably. Additionally, Key has moved to cease
conducting business with nonrelationship homebuilders outside of
its 14-state Community Banking footprint. |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
On October 1, 2007, Key acquired Tuition Management Systems, Inc.,
one of the nations largest providers of outsourced tuition
planning, billing, counseling and payment services. Headquartered
in Warwick, Rhode Island, Tuition Management Systems serves more
than 700 colleges, universities, elementary and secondary
educational institutions. The combination of the payment plan
systems and technology in place at Tuition Management Systems and
the array of payment plan products offered by Keys Consumer
Finance line of business created one of the largest payment plan
providers in the nation. |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
On February 9, 2007, McDonald Investments Inc., a wholly owned
subsidiary of KeyCorp, sold its branch network, which included
approximately 570 financial advisors and field support staff, and
certain fixed assets. Key retained the corporate and
institutional businesses, including Institutional
Equities and Equity Research, Debt Capital Markets and Investment Banking. In addition,
KeyBank continues to operate the Wealth Management, Trust and Private Banking businesses. On
April 16, 2007, Key renamed the registered broker/dealer through which its corporate and
institutional investment banking and securities businesses operate to KeyBanc Capital Markets
Inc. |
49
Line of Business Results
This section summarizes the financial performance and related strategic developments of Keys two
major business groups: Community Banking and National Banking. To better understand this
discussion, see Note 4 (Line of Business Results), which begins on page 14. Note 4 describes the
products and services offered by each of these business groups, provides more detailed financial
information pertaining to the groups and their respective lines of business, and explains Other
Segments and Reconciling Items.
Figure 6 summarizes the contribution made by each major business group to Keys taxable-equivalent
revenue and (loss) income from continuing operations for the three- and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007. Keys line of business results for each of these periods reflect a new
organizational structure that took effect January 1, 2008.
Figure 6. Major Business Groups Taxable-Equivalent Revenue and (Loss) Income
from Continuing Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
dollars in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
REVENUE FROM CONTINUING
OPERATIONS (TE) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Banking a |
|
$ |
659 |
|
|
$ |
631 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
$ |
1,288 |
|
|
$ |
1,438 |
|
|
$ |
(150 |
) |
|
|
(10.4 |
)% |
National Banking b |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
(738 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
1,207 |
|
|
|
(893 |
) |
|
|
(74.0 |
) |
Other Segments c |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
(132 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
Total Segments |
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
1,344 |
|
|
|
(842 |
) |
|
|
(62.6 |
) |
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
2,727 |
|
|
|
(1,130 |
) |
|
|
(41.4 |
) |
Reconciling Items d |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
455 |
|
|
$ |
1,355 |
|
|
$ |
(900 |
) |
|
|
(66.4 |
)% |
|
$ |
1,687 |
|
|
$ |
2,709 |
|
|
$ |
(1,022 |
) |
|
|
(37.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Banking a |
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
$ |
219 |
|
|
$ |
307 |
|
|
$ |
(88 |
) |
|
|
(28.7 |
)% |
National Banking b |
|
|
(670 |
) |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
(827 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
(694 |
) |
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
(1,006 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
Other Segments c |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(83.0 |
) |
|
Total Segments |
|
|
(579 |
) |
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
(893 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
(467 |
) |
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
(1,133 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
Reconciling Items d |
|
|
(547 |
) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(570 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
(441 |
) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(470 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(1,126 |
) |
|
$ |
337 |
|
|
$ |
(1,463 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
$ |
(908 |
) |
|
$ |
695 |
|
|
$ |
(1,603 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Community Bankings results for the first quarter of 2007 include a $171 million ($107
million after tax) gain from the February 9, 2007, sale of the McDonald Investments branch
network. See Note 3 (Acquisitions and Divestitures), which begins on page 12, for more
information pertaining to this transaction. |
|
(b) |
|
During the second quarter of 2008, National Bankings taxable-equivalent net interest income
and net income were reduced by $838 million and $536 million, respectively, as a result of an
adverse federal court decision on the tax treatment of a Service Contract Lease transaction.
During the prior quarter, National Banking increased its tax reserves for certain LILO
transactions and recalculated its lease income in accordance with prescribed accounting
standards. These actions reduced National Bankings taxable-equivalent revenue by $34 million
and its net income by $21 million in the first quarter. National Bankings results for the
first quarter of 2007 include a $26 million ($17 million after tax) gain from the settlement
of the residual value insurance litigation. |
|
(c) |
|
Other Segments results for the second quarter of 2007 include a $26 million ($16 million
after tax) charge for litigation. This charge and the litigation charge referred to in note
(d) below comprise the $42 million charge recorded in connection with the Honsador litigation.
Other Segments results for the first quarter of 2007 include a $49 million ($31 million
after tax) loss from the repositioning of the securities portfolio. |
|
(d) |
|
Reconciling Items for the second quarter of 2008 include a $475 million charge to income
taxes for the interest cost associated with the leveraged lease tax litigation. Reconciling
Items for the prior quarter include a $165 million ($103 million after tax) gain from the
partial redemption of Keys equity interest in Visa Inc. and a $17 million charge to income
taxes for the interest
cost associated with the increase to Keys tax reserves for certain LILO transactions.
Reconciling Items for the second quarter of 2007 include a $40 million ($25 million after tax)
gain related to MasterCard Incorporated shares, and a $16 million ($10 million after tax) charge
for litigation. |
|
TE = Taxable Equivalent |
|
N/M = Not Meaningful |
50
Community Banking summary of operations
As shown in Figure 7, Community Banking recorded net income of $104 million for the second quarter
of 2008, compared to $102 million for the year-ago quarter. Increases in both net interest income
and noninterest income accounted for the improvement, but were substantially offset by a higher
provision for loan losses.
Taxable-equivalent net interest income rose by $20 million, or 5%, from the second quarter of 2007.
The increase was attributable to a $1.9 billion, or 7%, rise in average earning assets, due
largely to growth in the commercial loan portfolio, and a $3.8 billion, or 8%, increase in average
deposits. Both loans and deposits experienced organic growth and benefited from the January 1
acquisition of U.S.B. Holding Co., Inc. described below. The positive effect of this growth was
offset in part by the impact of tighter loan and deposit spreads.
Noninterest income increased by $8 million, or 4%, from the same period one year ago, reflecting
strong growth in bank channel investment product sales income and deposit service charge income.
The provision for loan losses rose by $23 million, or 110%, compared to the second quarter of 2007,
reflecting a $12 million increase in net loan charge-offs and the remainder a provision for general
weakness in the economy.
On January 1, 2008, Key acquired U.S.B. Holding Co., Inc., the holding company for Union State
Bank, a 31-branch state-chartered commercial bank headquartered in Orangeburg, New York. The
acquisition doubles Keys branch penetration in the attractive Lower Hudson Valley area. Assets
and deposits acquired in this transaction were assigned to both the Community Banking and National
Banking groups.
On February 9, 2007, McDonald Investments Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of KeyCorp, sold its
branch network, which included approximately 570 financial advisors and field support staff, and
certain fixed assets. Key retained the corporate and institutional businesses, including
Institutional Equities and Equity Research, Debt Capital Markets and Investment Banking. In
addition, KeyBank continues to operate the Wealth Management, Trust and Private Banking businesses.
On April 16, 2007, Key renamed its registered broker/dealer through which its corporate and
institutional investment banking and securities businesses operate. The new name is KeyBanc
Capital Markets Inc.
Figure 7. Community Banking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
dollars in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (TE) |
|
$ |
437 |
|
|
$ |
417 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
$ |
860 |
|
|
$ |
836 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
Noninterest income |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
602 |
a |
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
(28.9 |
) |
|
Total revenue (TE) |
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
1,288 |
|
|
|
1,438 |
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(10.4 |
) |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
109.5 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
77.1 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
.7 |
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
Income before income taxes (TE) |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
(28.7 |
) |
Allocated income taxes and TE adjustments |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(28.8 |
) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
$ |
219 |
|
|
$ |
307 |
|
|
$ |
(88 |
) |
|
|
(28.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of consolidated income from
continuing operations |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AVERAGE BALANCES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases |
|
$ |
28,478 |
|
|
$ |
26,574 |
|
|
$ |
1,904 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
$ |
28,303 |
|
|
$ |
26,514 |
|
|
$ |
1,789 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
Total assets |
|
|
31,385 |
|
|
|
29,346 |
|
|
|
2,039 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
31,227 |
|
|
|
29,317 |
|
|
|
1,910 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
49,948 |
|
|
|
46,126 |
|
|
|
3,822 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
49,857 |
|
|
|
46,322 |
|
|
|
3,535 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets under management at period end |
|
$ |
19,366 |
|
|
$ |
21,061 |
|
|
$ |
(1,695 |
) |
|
|
(8.0 |
)% |
|
$ |
19,366 |
|
|
$ |
21,061 |
|
|
$ |
(1,695 |
) |
|
|
(8.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Community Bankings results for the first quarter of 2007 include a $171 million ($107
million after tax) gain from the February 9, 2007, sale of the McDonald Investments branch
network. See Note 3 (Acquisitions and Divestitures), which begins on page 12, for more
information pertaining to this transaction. |
TE = Taxable Equivalent |
|
N/M = Not Meaningful |
|
N/A = Not Applicable |
51
ADDITIONAL COMMUNITY BANKING DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
dollars in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
AVERAGE DEPOSITS OUTSTANDING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW and money market deposit accounts |
|
$ |
19,656 |
|
|
$ |
18,970 |
|
|
$ |
686 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
$ |
19,761 |
|
|
$ |
19,292 |
|
|
$ |
469 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
Savings deposits |
|
|
1,804 |
|
|
|
1,619 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
1,779 |
|
|
|
1,619 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
Certificates of deposits ($100,000 or more) |
|
|
6,661 |
|
|
|
4,709 |
|
|
|
1,952 |
|
|
|
41.5 |
|
|
|
6,548 |
|
|
|
4,630 |
|
|
|
1,918 |
|
|
|
41.4 |
|
Other time deposits |
|
|
12,735 |
|
|
|
12,038 |
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
12,756 |
|
|
|
12,044 |
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
Deposits in foreign office |
|
|
1,306 |
|
|
|
1,046 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
1,281 |
|
|
|
1,002 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
7,786 |
|
|
|
7,744 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
.5 |
|
|
|
7,732 |
|
|
|
7,735 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
49,948 |
|
|
$ |
46,126 |
|
|
$ |
3,822 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
$ |
49,857 |
|
|
$ |
46,322 |
|
|
$ |
3,535 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HOME EQUITY LOANS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balance |
|
$ |
9,766 |
|
|
$ |
9,660 |
|
Weighted-average loan-to-value ratio |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
Percent first lien positions |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER DATA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On-line households/household penetration |
|
|
759,003 / 45 |
% |
|
|
723,955 / 44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Branches |
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
954 |
|
Automated teller machines |
|
|
1,479 |
|
|
|
1,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Banking summary of continuing operations
As shown in Figure 8, National Banking recorded a loss of $670 million from continuing operations
for the second quarter of 2008, compared to income of $157 million from continuing operations for
the same period last year. During the second quarter of 2008, National Bankings net interest
income was adversely affected by a federal court ruling on the tax treatment of a segment of Keys
leveraged lease financing portfolio as further described below. Also contributing to the less
favorable results compared to the year-ago quarter were a substantially higher provision for loan
losses and an increase in noninterest expense, offset in part by significant growth in noninterest
income.
National Bankings taxable-equivalent net interest income for the second quarter of 2008 was
reduced significantly as a result of an adverse federal court ruling on the companys tax treatment
of a Service Contract Lease transaction entered into by AWG Leasing Trust, in which Key is a
partner. As a result of this ruling, under Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Staff
Position No. 13-2, Accounting for a Change or Projected Change in the Timing of Cash Flows
Relating to Income Taxes Generated by a Leveraged Lease Transaction, National Banking recalculated
its lease income from inception for this particular transaction, as well as any other lease
financing transactions being contested by the IRS.
Excluding the additional charges associated with these actions, taxable-equivalent net interest
income grew by $27 million, or 8%, from the second quarter of 2007 as a result of increases in
average earning assets and deposits, offset in part by tighter loan and deposit spreads and a
higher level of nonperforming assets. Average loans and leases grew by $8.6 billion, or 22%, while
average deposits rose by $207 million, or 2%, from the year-ago quarter.
Noninterest income increased by $73 million, or 27%, reflecting higher income from several
fee-based businesses. Income from investment banking and capital markets activities rose by $35
million, while trust and investment services income was up $23 million. Increases in income from
tuition payment plan processing, as well as syndication and other loan-related fees also
contributed to the improvement.
The provision for loan losses rose by $577 million, due primarily to a higher level of net loan
charge-offs recorded in the commercial real estate portfolio. National Bankings provision for
loan losses for the second quarter of 2008 exceeded its net loan charge-offs by $123 million, as
the company continued to build reserves.
52
Figure 8. National Banking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
dollars in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest (loss) income (TE) |
|
$ |
(472 |
) a |
|
$ |
339 |
|
|
$ |
(811 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
$ |
(133 |
) a |
|
$ |
675 |
|
|
$ |
(808 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
26.7 |
% |
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
532 |
a |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
(16.0 |
)% |
|
Total revenue (TE) |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
(738 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
1,207 |
|
|
|
(893 |
) |
|
|
(74.0 |
) |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income
taxes (TE) |
|
|
(1,072 |
) |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
(1,322 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
(1,110 |
) |
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
(1,609 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
Allocated income taxes and TE adjustments |
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
(495 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
(416 |
) |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
(603 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
|
(670 |
) |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
(827 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
(694 |
) |
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
(1,006 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(670 |
) |
|
$ |
154 |
|
|
$ |
(824 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
$ |
(694 |
) |
|
$ |
301 |
|
|
$ |
(995 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of consolidated income from continuing operations |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AVERAGE BALANCES FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases |
|
$ |
47,876 |
|
|
$ |
39,325 |
|
|
$ |
8,551 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
% |
|
$ |
46,013 |
|
|
$ |
39,085 |
|
|
$ |
6,928 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
% |
Loans held for sale |
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
|
4,377 |
|
|
|
(3,095 |
) |
|
|
(70.7 |
) |
|
|
3,107 |
|
|
|
4,148 |
|
|
|
(1,041 |
) |
|
|
(25.1 |
) |
Total assets |
|
|
56,242 |
|
|
|
49,585 |
|
|
|
6,657 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
56,230 |
|
|
|
49,003 |
|
|
|
7,227 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
12,289 |
|
|
|
12,082 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
12,088 |
|
|
|
11,691 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets under management at period end |
|
$ |
61,632 |
|
|
$ |
64,531 |
|
|
$ |
(2,899 |
) |
|
|
(4.5 |
)% |
|
$ |
61,632 |
|
|
$ |
64,531 |
|
|
$ |
(2,899 |
) |
|
|
(4.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
During the second quarter of 2008, National Bankings taxable-equivalent net interest income
and net income were reduced by $838 million and $536 million, respectively, as a result of an
adverse federal court decision on the tax treatment of a Service Contract Lease transaction.
During the prior quarter, National Banking increased its tax reserves for certain LILO
transactions and recalculated its lease income in accordance with prescribed accounting
standards. These actions reduced National Bankings taxable-equivalent revenue by $34 million
and its net income by $21 million in the first quarter. National Bankings results for the
first quarter of 2007 include a $26 million ($17 million after tax) gain from the settlement
of the residual value insurance litigation. |
|
TE = Taxable Equivalent |
|
N/M = Not Meaningful |
|
N/A = Not Applicable |
Other Segments
Other segments consist of Corporate Treasury and Keys Principal Investing unit. These segments
generated a net loss of $13 million for the second quarter of 2008, compared to net income of $55
million for the same period last year. These results reflect net losses of $14 million from
principal investing in the second quarter of 2008, compared to net gains of $90 million for the
year-ago quarter.
53
Results of Operations
Net interest income
One of Keys principal sources of revenue is net interest income. Net interest income is the
difference between interest income received on earning assets (such as loans and securities) and
loan-related fee income, and interest expense paid on deposits and borrowings. There are several
factors that affect net interest income, including:
|
|
|
¨
|
|
the volume, pricing, mix and maturity of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities; |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
the volume and value of net free funds, such as noninterest-bearing deposits and equity capital; |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
the use of derivative instruments to manage interest rate risk; |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
interest rate fluctuations and competitive conditions within the marketplace; and |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
asset quality. |
To make it easier to compare results among several periods and the yields on various types of
earning assets (some taxable, some not), we present net interest income in this discussion on a
taxable-equivalent basis (i.e., as if it were all taxable and at the same rate). For example,
$100 of tax-exempt income would be presented as $154, an amount that if taxed at the statutory
federal income tax rate of 35% would yield $100.
Figure 10, which spans pages 57 and 58, shows the various components of Keys balance sheet that
affect interest income and expense, and their respective yields or rates over the past five
quarters. The net interest margin, which is an indicator of the profitability of the earning
assets portfolio, is calculated by dividing net interest income by average earning assets. This
figure also presents a reconciliation of taxable-equivalent net interest income for each of the
past five quarters to net interest income reported in accordance with GAAP.
Keys taxable-equivalent net interest income for the second quarter of 2008 was reduced
significantly as a result of an adverse federal court decision on the companys tax treatment of a
Service Contract Lease transaction entered into by AWG Leasing Trust, in which Key is a partner.
The Court decision, which Key has appealed, applies only to the single AWG Leasing transaction.
Notwithstanding the appeal, management believes that the applicable accounting guidance requires
Key to recalculate lease income recognized on all leveraged leases being contested by the IRS, not
just the single leveraged lease subject to the Court decision. Under FASB Staff Position No. 13-2,
Accounting for a Change or Projected Change in the Timing of Cash Flows Relating to Income Taxes
Generated by a Leveraged Lease Transaction, Key has recalculated the lease income recognized from
inception for all of the contested leases. Keys second quarter results also reflect a $475
million charge to income taxes for the interest cost associated with the contested tax liabilities.
These actions reduced Keys taxable-equivalent net interest income and net interest margin for the
second quarter of 2008 by $838 million and 376 basis points, respectively, and reduced Keys
earnings by $1.011 billion, or $2.43 per common share. A basis point is equal to one one-hundredth
of a percentage point, meaning 376 basis points equal 3.76%.
As previously reported, Service Contract Leases, LILO transactions discussed on the following page
and Qualified Technological Equipment Leases represent a portion of Keys overall leveraged lease
financing portfolio, and the tax deductions for some of these transactions are being challenged by
the IRS. Additional information related to these lease financing transactions and the status of
Keys response to the IRS disallowance and federal tax court decision is included in Note 12
(Income Taxes), which begins on page 27.
54
The impact of the leveraged lease accounting charges on the components of Keys interest income and
related yields for the second quarter of 2008 are shown in Figure 9.
Figure 9. Second Quarter 2008 Adjusted Interest and Yields
From Continuing Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Adjusted Basis |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dollars in millions |
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Yield/Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Yield/Rate |
|
|
Total commercial
loans |
|
$ |
54,932 |
|
|
$ |
(83 |
) |
|
|
(.58 |
)% |
|
$ |
54,932 |
|
|
$ |
755 |
|
|
|
5.52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
89,742 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
1.89 |
|
|
|
89,742 |
|
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
|
5.63 |
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
77,172 |
|
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
2.75 |
|
|
|
77,172 |
|
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
2.75 |
|
|
Interest rate spread (TE) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.86 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.88 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest (loss) income (TE) and net
interest margin (TE) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
(.44 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
3.32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(458 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding the charges associated with the leveraged lease tax litigation, Keys taxable-equivalent
net interest income was $738 million for the second quarter of 2008, compared to $706 million for
the year-ago quarter. Average earning assets rose by $8.2 billion, or 10%, due primarily to growth
in commercial loans and the January 1 acquisition of U.S.B. Holding Co., Inc., which added
approximately $1.5 billion to Keys loan portfolio. The growth in commercial loans was due in part
to the higher demand for credit caused by the volatile capital markets environment. The adjusted
net interest margin for the current quarter declined to 3.32% from 3.46% for the second quarter of
2007. The reduction was attributable largely to tighter loan and deposit spreads caused by
competitive pricing, and a higher level of nonperforming assets.
Compared to the first quarter of 2008, Keys taxable-equivalent net interest income and net
interest margin were essentially unchanged, after excluding the effects of charges recorded in
connection with leveraged lease transactions in both periods. During the first quarter of 2008,
Key increased its tax reserves for certain LILO transactions and recalculated its income under FASB
Staff Position No. 13-2. These actions reduced Keys taxable-equivalent net interest income and
net interest margin for the first quarter of 2008 by $34 million and 15 basis points, respectively,
and reduced Keys earnings by $38 million, or $.10 per diluted common share. On an adjusted basis,
Key had taxable-equivalent net interest income of $738 million and a net interest margin of 3.29%
for the first quarter of 2008.
Over the remainder of the year, management expects Keys net interest margin to be in the range of
3.15% to 3.20%. Management believes the effects of the lease financing accounting adjustment
recorded in the second quarter and the continuation of competitive pressure on deposit pricing will
offset the impact of more favorable yields on new assets.
55
Since January 1, 2007, the growth and composition of Keys earning assets have been affected by the
following actions:
|
|
|
¨
|
|
During the first quarter of 2008, Key increased its loan portfolio
(primarily commercial real estate and consumer loans) through the
acquisition of U.S.B. Holding Co., Inc., the holding company for
Union State Bank, a 31-branch state-chartered commercial bank
headquartered in Orangeburg, New York. |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Key sold commercial real estate loans of $965 million during the
first six months of 2008 and $3.8 billion ($238 million through a
securitization) during all of 2007. Since some of these loans
have been sold with limited recourse (i.e., there is a risk that
Key will be held accountable for certain events or representations
made in the sales agreements), Key established and has maintained
a loss reserve in an amount estimated by management to be
appropriate. More information about the related recourse
agreement is provided in Note 13 (Contingent Liabilities and
Guarantees) under the heading Recourse agreement with Federal
National Mortgage Association on
page 30. |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Key sold education loans of $110 million during the first half of
2008 and $247 million during all of 2007. In March 2008, Key
transferred $3.3 billion of education loans from held-for-sale
status to the held-to-maturity loan portfolio. The secondary
markets for these loans have been adversely affected by market
liquidity issues, prompting the companys decision to move them to
a held-to-maturity classification. |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
Key sold other loans (primarily residential mortgage loans)
totaling $483 million during the six months of 2008 and $1.2
billion during all of 2007. |
56
Figure 10. Average Balance Sheets, Net Interest Income and Yields/Rates
From Continuing Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter 2008 |
|
|
First Quarter 2008 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
dollars in millions |
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans: a,b |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
|
$ |
26,057 |
|
|
$ |
352 |
|
|
|
5.42 |
% |
|
$ |
25,411 |
|
|
$ |
392 |
|
|
|
6.21 |
% |
Real estate commercial mortgage |
|
|
10,593 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
5.91 |
|
|
|
10,283 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
6.84 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
8,484 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
5.61 |
|
|
|
8,468 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
6.36 |
|
Commercial lease financing |
|
|
9,798 |
|
|
|
(709 |
) |
|
|
(28.94 |
) c |
|
|
10,004 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
3.91 |
c |
|
Total commercial loans |
|
|
54,932 |
|
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(.58 |
) |
|
|
54,166 |
|
|
|
799 |
|
|
|
5.93 |
|
Real estate residential |
|
|
1,918 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
6.12 |
|
|
|
1,916 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
6.29 |
|
Home equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Banking |
|
|
9,765 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
5.78 |
|
|
|
9,693 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
6.38 |
|
National Banking |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
7.68 |
|
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
7.74 |
|
|
Total home equity loans |
|
|
10,965 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
5.99 |
|
|
|
10,953 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
6.54 |
|
Consumer other Community Banking |
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
10.34 |
|
|
|
1,305 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
10.59 |
|
Consumer other National Banking: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marine |
|
|
3,646 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
6.26 |
|
|
|
3,646 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
6.31 |
|
Education |
|
|
3,595 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
5.88 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8.04 |
|
Other |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8.21 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8.32 |
|
|
Total consumer other National Banking |
|
|
7,566 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
6.16 |
|
|
|
4,348 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
6.61 |
|
|
Total consumer loans |
|
|
21,720 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
6.32 |
|
|
|
18,522 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
6.81 |
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
76,652 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
1.37 |
|
|
|
72,688 |
|
|
|
1,113 |
|
|
|
6.15 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
1,356 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
5.94 |
|
|
|
4,984 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
7.01 |
|
Securities available for sale a,d |
|
|
8,315 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
5.40 |
|
|
|
8,419 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
5.28 |
|
Held-to-maturity securities a |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.47 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
11.02 |
|
Trading account assets |
|
|
1,041 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
3.88 |
|
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
4.84 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
773 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
3.83 |
|
|
|
1,165 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3.18 |
|
Other investments d |
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
3.09 |
|
|
|
1,552 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
3.05 |
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
89,742 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
1.89 |
|
|
|
89,912 |
|
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
|
6.01 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(1,338 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,236 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued income and other assets |
|
|
14,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
103,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
103,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW and money market deposit accounts |
|
$ |
27,158 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
1.51 |
|
|
$ |
26,996 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
2.07 |
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
.27 |
|
|
|
1,865 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
.62 |
|
Certificates of deposit ($100,000 or more) e |
|
|
8,670 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
4.09 |
|
|
|
8,072 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
4.72 |
|
Other time deposits |
|
|
12,751 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
4.27 |
|
|
|
12,759 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
4.59 |
|
Deposits in foreign office |
|
|
4,121 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
1.95 |
|
|
|
5,853 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
3.13 |
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
54,515 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
2.56 |
|
|
|
55,545 |
|
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
3.10 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities
sold under repurchase agreements |
|
|
3,267 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
1.86 |
|
|
|
3,863 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
2.91 |
|
Bank notes and other short-term borrowings |
|
|
4,770 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
2.26 |
|
|
|
4,934 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
3.22 |
|
Long-term debt
e, f |
|
|
14,620 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
3.87 |
|
|
|
13,238 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
4.71 |
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
77,172 |
|
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
2.75 |
|
|
|
77,580 |
|
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
3.36 |
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
10,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expense and other liabilities |
|
|
6,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shareholders equity |
|
|
8,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
8,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
103,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
103,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread (TE) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.86 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.65 |
% |
|
Net interest (loss) income (TE) and net
interest margin (TE) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) c |
|
|
(.44 |
)% c |
|
|
|
|
|
|
704 |
c |
|
|
3.14 |
% c |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE adjustment a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(458 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income, GAAP basis |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balances have not been restated to reflect Keys January 1, 2008, adoption of
FASB Interpretation No. 39, Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts, and
FASB Staff Position FIN 39-1, Amendment of FASB Interpretation 39. Keys adoption of
this accounting guidance is described in Note 1 (Basis of Presentation) under the
heading Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in 2008 on page 9.
(a) |
|
Interest income on tax-exempt securities and loans has been adjusted to a taxable-equivalent
basis using the statutory federal income tax rate of 35%. |
|
(b) |
|
For purposes of these computations, nonaccrual loans are included in average loan balances. |
|
(c) |
|
During the second quarter of 2008, Keys taxable-equivalent net interest income and net
income were reduced by $838 million and $1.011 billion, respectively, as a result of an
adverse federal court decision on Keys tax treatment of a Service Contract Lease
transaction. Excluding this reduction, the taxable-equivalent yield on Keys commercial
lease financing portfolio would have been 5.25% for the second quarter of 2008, and Keys
taxable-equivalent net interest margin would have been 3.32%. During the prior quarter,
Key increased its tax reserves for certain LILO transactions and recalculated its lease
income in accordance with prescribed accounting standards. These actions reduced Keys
first quarter 2008 taxable-equivalent net interest income and net income by $34 million and
$38 million, respectively. Excluding this reduction, the taxable-equivalent yield on Keys
commercial lease financing portfolio would have been 5.27% for the first quarter of 2008,
and Keys taxable-equivalent net interest margin would have been 3.29%. |
57
Figure 10. Average Balance Sheets, Net Interest Income and Yields/Rates
From Continuing Operations (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter 2007 |
|
|
Third Quarter 2007 |
|
|
Second Quarter 2007 |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,825 |
|
|
$ |
419 |
|
|
|
6.98 |
% |
|
$ |
22,393 |
|
|
$ |
410 |
|
|
|
7.25 |
% |
|
$ |
21,856 |
|
|
$ |
401 |
|
|
|
7.36 |
% |
|
9,351 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
7.42 |
|
|
|
8,855 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
7.69 |
|
|
|
8,565 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
7.75 |
|
|
8,192 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
7.42 |
|
|
|
8,285 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
8.01 |
|
|
|
8,243 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
8.09 |
|
|
10,252 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
6.65 |
|
|
|
10,172 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
5.80 |
|
|
|
10,096 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
5.62 |
|
|
|
51,620 |
|
|
|
918 |
|
|
|
7.06 |
|
|
|
49,705 |
|
|
|
896 |
|
|
|
7.16 |
|
|
|
48,760 |
|
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
7.19 |
|
|
1,596 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
6.72 |
|
|
|
1,586 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
6.68 |
|
|
|
1,472 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
6.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,658 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
6.92 |
|
|
|
9,690 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
7.14 |
|
|
|
9,660 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
7.15 |
|
|
1,259 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
7.77 |
|
|
|
1,193 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
7.85 |
|
|
|
1,092 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
7.86 |
|
|
|
10,917 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
7.02 |
|
|
|
10,883 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
7.22 |
|
|
|
10,752 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
7.22 |
|
|
1,308 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
10.73 |
|
|
|
1,342 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
10.66 |
|
|
|
1,370 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
10.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,608 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
6.34 |
|
|
|
3,506 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
6.32 |
|
|
|
3,323 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
6.26 |
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
9.47 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
9.65 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
9.56 |
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8.66 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8.92 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
9.18 |
|
|
|
|
4,276 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
6.76 |
|
|
|
4,164 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
6.79 |
|
|
|
3,961 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
6.76 |
|
|
|
18,097 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
7.20 |
|
|
|
17,975 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
7.33 |
|
|
|
17,555 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
7.33 |
|
|
|
69,717 |
|
|
|
1,245 |
|
|
|
7.10 |
|
|
|
67,680 |
|
|
|
1,227 |
|
|
|
7.20 |
|
|
|
66,315 |
|
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
7.23 |
|
|
4,748 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
7.53 |
|
|
|
4,731 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
7.59 |
|
|
|
4,415 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
7.50 |
|
|
7,858 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
5.89 |
|
|
|
7,825 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
|
7,793 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6.24 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.43 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.72 |
|
|
1,042 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
4.40 |
|
|
|
1,055 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
4.39 |
|
|
|
813 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
3.58 |
|
|
1,226 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3.32 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
4.93 |
|
|
1,589 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
3.02 |
|
|
|
1,563 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
2.99 |
|
|
|
1,541 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
3.68 |
|
|
|
86,210 |
|
|
|
1,487 |
|
|
|
6.86 |
|
|
|
83,523 |
|
|
|
1,452 |
|
|
|
6.92 |
|
|
|
81,587 |
|
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
6.95 |
|
|
(966 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(942 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(942 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
98,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
95,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
93,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,687 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
3.05 |
|
|
$ |
24,190 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
3.41 |
|
|
$ |
22,953 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
3.14 |
|
|
1,523 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
.19 |
|
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.19 |
|
|
|
1,633 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
.19 |
|
|
|
6,887 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
4.98 |
|
|
|
6,274 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
5.06 |
|
|
|
6,237 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
5.03 |
|
|
11,455 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
4.68 |
|
|
|
11,512 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
4.68 |
|
|
|
12,047 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
4.70 |
|
|
5,720 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
4.42 |
|
|
|
4,540 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
3,600 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
5.20 |
|
|
|
51,272 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
|
|
|
48,097 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
3.98 |
|
|
|
46,470 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
3.85 |
|
|
|
4,194 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
4.23 |
|
|
|
4,470 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
4.85 |
|
|
|
4,748 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
5.04 |
|
|
|
4,233 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
4.15 |
|
|
|
2,539 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
4.70 |
|
|
|
1,771 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
4.14 |
|
|
11,851 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
5.72 |
|
|
|
11,801 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
5.89 |
|
|
|
12,909 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
5.83 |
|
|
|
71,550 |
|
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
4.11 |
|
|
|
66,907 |
|
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
4.40 |
|
|
|
65,898 |
|
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
4.33 |
|
|
12,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
98,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
95,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
93,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.62 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
3.48 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
3.40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
3.46 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) |
|
Yield is calculated on the basis of amortized cost. |
|
(e) |
|
Rate calculation excludes basis adjustments related to fair value hedges. |
|
(f) |
|
Results from continuing operations exclude the dollar amount of
liabilities assumed necessary to support interest-earning assets held by the
discontinued Champion Mortgage finance business. The interest expense
related to these liabilities, which also is excluded from continuing
operations, was calculated using a matched funds transfer pricing
methodology. |
|
TE = Taxable Equivalent |
|
GAAP = U.S. generally accepted accounting principles |
58
Figure 11 shows how the changes in yields or rates, and average balances from the prior year
affected net interest income. The section entitled Financial Condition, which begins on page 65,
contains more discussion about changes in earning assets and funding sources.
Figure 11. Components of Net Interest (Loss) Income Changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From three months ended June 30, 2007 |
|
|
From six months ended June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
to three months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
to six months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Net |
|
in millions |
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Change |
|
|
INTEREST INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
162 |
|
|
$ |
(1,099 |
) |
|
$ |
(937 |
) |
|
$ |
280 |
|
|
$ |
(1,286 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,006 |
) |
Loans held for sale |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
Securities available for sale |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
Trading account assets |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Other investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
Total interest income (TE) |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
(1,117 |
) |
|
|
(993 |
) |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
(1,313 |
) |
|
|
(1,037 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW and money market deposit accounts |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
(115 |
) |
Savings deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Certificates of deposit ($100,000 or more) |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
28 |
|
Other time deposits |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
Deposits in foreign office |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
(254 |
) |
|
|
(105 |
) |
Federal funds purchased and securities sold
under repurchase agreements |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
Bank notes and other short-term borrowings |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
(434 |
) |
|
|
(235 |
) |
|
Net interest (loss) income (TE) |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
(834 |
) |
|
$ |
(806 |
) |
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
(879 |
) |
|
$ |
(802 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in interest not due solely to volume or rate has been allocated in proportion to the
absolute dollar amounts of the change in each.
TE = Taxable Equivalent
Noninterest income
Keys noninterest income was $555 million for the second quarter of 2008, compared to $649 million
for the year-ago quarter. For the first six months of the year, noninterest income was $1.1
billion, representing a decrease of $220 million, or 17%, from the first six months of 2007.
As shown in Figure 13, the decrease from the year-ago quarter was attributable largely to net
losses of $14 million from principal investing in the second quarter of 2008, compared to net gains
of $90 million for the same period last year. Additionally, results for the second quarter of 2007
benefited from a $40 million gain related to the sale of MasterCard Incorporated shares. These
factors were offset in part by higher income from several fee-based businesses. Income from
investment banking and capital markets activities rose by $28 million, trust and investment
services income was up $23 million, and income from deposit service charges grew by $9 million.
59
The trend in the major components of Keys fee-based income over the past five quarters is shown in
Figure 12.
Figure 12. Fee-Based Income Major Components
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
in millions |
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
Trust and investment services income |
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
$ |
131 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
115 |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
Investment banking and capital markets income |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
Operating lease income |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Letter of credit and loan fees |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Corporate-owned life insurance income |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Electronic banking fees |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
For the year-to-date period, the decrease in noninterest income reflected several significant
items. During the first quarter of 2008, Key recorded a $165 million gain from the partial
redemption of Visa Inc. shares. Results for the first half of 2007 included the $40 million gain
related to the sale of MasterCard Incorporated shares, a $171 million gain associated with the sale
of the McDonald Investments branch network, a $26 million gain from the settlement of the
automobile residual value insurance litigation and a $49 million loss recorded in connection with
the repositioning of the securities portfolio.
Excluding the significant items discussed above, Keys noninterest income was $918 million for the
first six months of 2008, representing a $197 million, or 18%, decrease from the same period last
year. As shown in Figure 13, Key recorded net losses of $5 million from principal investing in the
first six months of 2008, compared to net gains of $119 million for the first half of 2007.
Additionally, Key had net losses from loan sales and write-downs of $68 million in the current
year, compared to net gains of $42 million through the first six months of 2007. The reduction in
noninterest income attributable to these factors was substantially offset by increases of $22
million in income from deposit service charges and $27 million in income from trust and investment
services. Last years results included $16 million of trust and investment services income
generated by the McDonald Investments branch network. Adjusting for this revenue, trust and
investment services income rose by $43 million, or 19%, driven by growth in institutional asset
management income, and income from brokerage commissions and fees.
Figure 13. Noninterest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
dollars in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Trust and investment services income |
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
$ |
267 |
|
|
$ |
240 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
% |
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
Investment banking and capital markets income |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
53.8 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
Operating lease income |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
Letter of credit and loan fees |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Corporate-owned life insurance income |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
Electronic banking fees |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Net gains (losses) from loan securitizations and sales |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
Net securities (losses) gains |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
Net (losses) gains from principal investing |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
Gain from redemption of Visa Inc. shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
Gain from sale of McDonald Investments branch network |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
(171 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
Other income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance income |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
33.3 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
|
Loan securitization servicing fees |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(16.7 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(18.2 |
) |
Credit card fees |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
Gains related to MasterCard Incorporated shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
Litigation settlement automobile residual value insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
Miscellaneous income |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(41.5 |
) |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(22.2 |
) |
|
Total other income |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(50.5 |
) |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(40.1 |
) |
|
Total noninterest income |
|
$ |
555 |
|
|
$ |
649 |
|
|
$ |
(94 |
) |
|
|
(14.5 |
)% |
|
$ |
1,083 |
|
|
$ |
1,303 |
|
|
$ |
(220 |
) |
|
|
(16.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M = Not Meaningful
60
The following discussion explains the composition of certain elements of Keys noninterest income
and the factors that caused those elements to change.
Trust and investment services income. Trust and investment services generally are Keys largest
source of noninterest income. The primary components of revenue generated by these services are
shown in Figure 14. The increases from 2007 results were attributable to strong growth in
institutional asset management income and higher income from brokerage commissions and fees.
Excluding the results of the McDonald Investments branch network, income from brokerage commissions
and fees was up $22 million from the first six months of 2007.
Figure 14. Trust and Investment Services Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Change |
dollars in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Brokerage commissions and fee income |
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
|
46.4 |
% |
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
% |
Personal asset management and custody fees |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institutional asset management and custody fees |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
Total trust and investment services income |
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
$ |
267 |
|
|
$ |
240 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A significant portion of Keys trust and investment services income depends on the value and mix of
assets under management. At June 30, 2008, Keys bank, trust and registered investment advisory
subsidiaries had assets under management of $81.0 billion, compared to $85.6 billion at June 30,
2007. As shown in Figure 15, most of the decrease was attributable to the securities lending
portfolio, due in part to increased volatility in the fixed income markets and actions taken by
management to maintain sufficient liquidity within the portfolio. When clients securities are
lent to a borrower, the borrower must provide Key with cash collateral, which is invested during
the term of the loan. The difference between the revenue generated from the investment and the
cost of the collateral is shared with the lending client. This business, although profitable,
generates a significantly lower rate of return (commensurate with the lower level of risk) than
other types of assets under management.
Figure 15. Assets Under Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
in millions |
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Assets under management by investment type: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
$ |
40,446 |
|
|
$ |
39,800 |
|
|
$ |
42,868 |
|
|
$ |
44,465 |
|
|
$ |
42,462 |
|
Securities lending |
|
|
17,756 |
|
|
|
18,476 |
|
|
|
20,228 |
|
|
|
22,056 |
|
|
|
22,595 |
|
Fixed income |
|
|
10,823 |
|
|
|
10,598 |
|
|
|
11,357 |
|
|
|
11,372 |
|
|
|
11,187 |
|
Money market |
|
|
9,604 |
|
|
|
9,746 |
|
|
|
9,440 |
|
|
|
8,861 |
|
|
|
8,069 |
|
Hedge funds |
|
|
2,369 |
|
|
|
1,833 |
|
|
|
1,549 |
|
|
|
1,346 |
|
|
|
1,279 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
80,998 |
|
|
$ |
80,453 |
|
|
$ |
85,442 |
|
|
$ |
88,100 |
|
|
$ |
85,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proprietary mutual funds included in assets under management: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market |
|
$ |
7,178 |
|
|
$ |
7,131 |
|
|
$ |
7,298 |
|
|
$ |
6,888 |
|
|
$ |
6,280 |
|
Equity |
|
|
7,202 |
|
|
|
6,556 |
|
|
|
6,957 |
|
|
|
6,748 |
|
|
|
6,392 |
|
Fixed income |
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
615 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
14,997 |
|
|
$ |
14,318 |
|
|
$ |
14,886 |
|
|
$ |
14,265 |
|
|
$ |
13,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts. Service charges on deposit accounts were up from the prior
year, due primarily to an increase in fee income from cash management services. Other factors
contributing to the improvement include growth in the number of transaction accounts within Keys
Community Banking Group, an increase in overdraft fee income resulting from higher transaction
volume and a rate increase instituted during the second quarter of 2007.
Investment banking and capital markets income. As shown in Figure 16, investment banking and
capital markets income increased from the year-ago quarter as a result of strong growth in income
from the investment banking business, and from dealer trading and derivatives. On a year-to-date
basis, the decline from the prior year was attributable to losses recorded during the first quarter
of 2008 from dealer trading and derivatives, and from certain real estate-related investments, both
of which reflected extraordinary volatility in the fixed income markets. During the second quarter
of 2008, results from dealer trading and derivatives showed substantial improvement, due in part to
actions taken by management in the prior quarter to mitigate the effects of future market
volatility on Keys held-for-sale and trading portfolios.
61
Figure 16. Investment Banking and Capital Markets Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Change |
dollars in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Investment banking income |
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
63.6 |
% |
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
|
34.9 |
% |
Income (loss) from other investments |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(83.3 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
Dealer trading and derivatives income |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
133.3 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(65.0 |
) |
Foreign exchange income |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
Total investment banking and capital markets income |
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
|
53.8 |
% |
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
|
(8.3) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M = Not Meaningful
Net gains (losses) from loan securitizations and sales. Key sells or securitizes loans to achieve
desired interest rate and credit risk profiles, to improve the profitability of the overall loan
portfolio or to diversify funding sources. During the first six months of 2008, Key recorded $68
million of net losses from loan sales and write-downs, compared to net gains of $42 million for the
first six months of 2007. Results for the current year reflect $101 million of net losses from
loan sales and write-downs recorded during the first quarter, due primarily to volatility in the
fixed income markets and the related housing correction. Approximately $84 million of these losses
pertained to commercial real estate loans held for sale. The types of loans sold during 2008 and
2007 are presented in Figure 21 on page 68. In March 2008, Key transferred $3.3 billion of
education loans from held-for-sale status to the loan portfolio. The secondary markets for these
loans have been adversely affected by market liquidity issues, precluding any recent
securitizations and prompting the companys decision to move them to a held-to-maturity
classification.
Net (losses) gains from principal investing. Principal investments consist of direct and indirect
investments in predominantly privately held companies. Keys principal investing income is
susceptible to volatility since most of it is derived from mezzanine debt and equity investments in
small to medium-sized businesses. These investments are carried on the balance sheet at fair value
($1.0 billion at June 30, 2008, $993 million at December 31, 2007, and $975 million at June 30,
2007). The net (losses) gains presented in Figure 13 derive from changes in fair values as well as
the sales of principal investments.
Noninterest expense
Noninterest expense for the second quarter of 2008 was $781 million, compared to $815 million for
the second quarter of 2007. For the first six months of the year, noninterest expense was $1.5
billion, representing a decrease of $86 million, or 5%, from the first six months of 2007.
As shown in Figure 17, personnel expense decreased by $7 million from the second quarter of 2007,
due primarily to a reduction in costs associated with employee benefits. Nonpersonnel expense
decreased by $27 million, due to a $42 million litigation charge (included in miscellaneous
expense) recorded during the second quarter of 2007, offset in part by a $7 million increase in
professional fees. See Note 13 (Contingent Liabilities and Guarantees), which begins on page 29,
for more information pertaining to the Honsador litigation charge.
For the year-to-date period, personnel expense decreased by $26 million. Approximately $13 million
of the reduction was attributable to the sale of the McDonald Investments branch network.
Nonpersonnel expense was down $60 million, due primarily to the litigation charge recorded during
the second quarter of 2007. Additionally, nonpersonnel expense included a $29 million credit for
losses on lending-related commitments in the current year, compared to a $2 million credit in the
prior year. The sale of the McDonald Investments branch network reduced Keys total nonpersonnel
expense by approximately $17 million.
The decline in total noninterest expense was moderated by additional expenses recorded during the
first half of 2008 as a result of the January 1, 2008, acquisition of U.S.B. Holding Co., Inc. and
the October 1, 2007, acquisition of Tuition Management Systems, Inc.
62
Figure 17. Noninterest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Change |
dollars in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Personnel |
|
$ |
404 |
|
|
$ |
411 |
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
)% |
|
$ |
813 |
|
|
$ |
839 |
|
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
)% |
Net occupancy |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Computer processing |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(12.2 |
) |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
Operating lease expense |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
26.9 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
Marketing |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(10.3 |
) |
Other expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postage and delivery |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchise and business taxes |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
Telecommunications |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
(Credit) provision for losses on lending-related commitments |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
Miscellaneous expense |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(17.3 |
) |
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(13.8 |
) |
|
Total other expense |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(20.6 |
) |
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
$ |
781 |
|
|
$ |
815 |
|
|
$ |
(34 |
) |
|
|
(4.2) |
% |
|
$ |
1,513 |
|
|
$ |
1,599 |
|
|
$ |
(86 |
) |
|
|
(5.4) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average full-time equivalent employees |
|
|
18,164 |
|
|
|
18,888 |
a |
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
)% |
|
|
18,295 |
|
|
|
19,342 |
a |
|
|
(1,047 |
) |
|
|
(5.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The number of average full-time equivalent employees has not been adjusted for discontinued
operations. |
|
N/M = Not meaningful |
The following discussion explains the composition of certain elements of Keys noninterest expense
and the factors that caused those elements to change.
Personnel. As shown in Figure 18, personnel expense, the largest category of Keys noninterest
expense, decreased by $26 million, or 3%, from the first six months of 2007. This improvement was
largely attributable to lower stock-based compensation, as well as decreases in costs associated
with salaries and employee benefits stemming from a 5% reduction in the average number of full-time
equivalent employees. The McDonald Investments branch network accounted for $4 million of Keys
personnel expense in the first half of 2008, compared to $17 million for the same period last year.
More than half of the reduction resulting from the sale of the McDonald Investments branch network
relates to incentive compensation.
Figure 18. Personnel Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Change |
dollars in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Salaries |
|
$ |
235 |
|
|
$ |
236 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
(.4 |
)% |
|
$ |
474 |
|
|
$ |
481 |
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
)% |
Incentive compensation |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
Employee benefits |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(11.0 |
) |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(22.5 |
) |
Severance |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
133.3 |
|
|
Total personnel expense |
|
$ |
404 |
|
|
$ |
411 |
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
)% |
|
$ |
813 |
|
|
$ |
839 |
|
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computer processing. The decrease in computer processing costs for both the quarterly and
year-to-date periods reflected a reduction in expenses attributable to the use of outside services.
Professional fees. The increase in professional fees for both the quarterly and year-to-date
periods was due in part to additional costs recorded in connection with increased collection
efforts on loans and product pricing.
63
Income taxes
The provision for income taxes from continuing operations was $611 million for the second quarter
of 2008, compared to $130 million for the comparable period in 2007. For the first six months of
2008, the provision for income taxes was $715 million, compared to $277 million for the first six
months of 2007. The significant increase in the tax provision reflects several developments
related to Keys tax treatment of certain leveraged lease financing transactions.
During the second quarter of 2008, Key received an adverse federal court decision on the companys
tax treatment of a Service Contract Lease transaction entered into by AWG Leasing Trust, in which
Key is a partner. Although the Court decision applies only to the previously disclosed AWG Leasing
Litigation, in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes, Key was required to increase the amount of unrecognized tax benefits associated with all of
the leases under challenge by the IRS by $2.15 billion. This amount has not been reduced by
existing tax deposits of $200 million. The increase in unrecognized tax benefits associated with
the contested leases necessitated a recalculation of Keys lease income under FASB Staff Position
No. 13-2, Accounting for a Change or Projected Change in the Timing of Cash Flows Relating to
Income Taxes Generated by a Leveraged Lease Transaction, as well as an increase to Keys tax
reserves. These actions reduced Keys second quarter 2008 after-tax earnings by $1.011 billion, or
$2.43 per common share, including a $359 million reduction to lease income, a $177 million increase
to the provision for income taxes and a $475 million charge to the tax provision for the interest
cost associated with the contested tax liabilities.
During the first quarter of 2008, Key increased the amount of its unrecognized tax benefits
associated with its LILO transactions by $46 million. This adjustment resulted from an updated
assessment of Keys tax position performed by management in accordance with the provisions of FASB
Interpretation No. 48. The increase in unrecognized tax benefits associated with Keys LILO
transactions also necessitated a recalculation of Keys lease income under FASB Staff Position No.
13-2 and an increase to Keys tax reserves. These actions reduced Keys first quarter 2008
after-tax earnings by $38 million, or $.10 per diluted common share, including a $3 million
reduction to lease income, an $18 million increase to the provision for income taxes and a $17
million charge to the tax provision for the associated interest charges.
The effective tax rate represents the provision for income taxes from continuing operations as a
percentage of income from continuing operations before income taxes. Excluding the lease financing
charges recorded in the current year, the effective tax rate was 17.4% for the second quarter of
2008, compared to 27.8% for the second quarter of 2007. On an adjusted basis, the effective tax
rates for the first six months of 2008 and 2007 were 33.9% and 28.5%, respectively.
On an adjusted basis, the effective tax rates for both the current and prior year are substantially
below Keys combined federal and state tax rate of 37.5%, primarily because Key generates income
from investments in tax-advantaged assets such as corporate-owned life insurance, earns credits
associated with investments in low-income housing projects and records tax deductions associated
with dividends paid on Key common shares held in the 401(k) savings plan.
In the ordinary course of business, Key enters into certain types of lease financing transactions,
including those discussed above, that result in tax deductions. The IRS has completed audits of
Keys income tax returns for a number of prior years and has disallowed the tax deductions taken in
connection with these transactions. Key is contesting the IRS position and challenging the
federal court decision in the AWG Leasing Litigation. Additional information related to the
specific types of lease financing transactions involved, and the status of Keys response to the
IRS disallowance and federal court decision is included in Note 12 (Income Taxes), which begins
on page 27.
64
Financial Condition
Loans and loans held for sale
At June 30, 2008, total loans outstanding were $75.9 billion, compared to $70.8 billion at December
31, 2007, and $66.7 billion at June 30, 2007. The increase in Keys loan portfolio over the past
twelve months was primarily attributable to growth in the commercial portfolio and the March
2008 transfer of $3.3 billion of education loans from held-for-sale status to the loan portfolio.
Commercial loan portfolio
Commercial loans outstanding increased by $5.3 billion, or 11%, from the year ago quarter, due
largely to a higher volume of originations in the commercial mortgage portfolio, and the
commercial, financial and agricultural portfolio. This growth reflected increased reliance by
borrowers on commercial lines of credit in response to the challenging economic environment, as
well as the January 1, 2008, acquisition of U.S.B. Holding Co., Inc., which added approximately $900
million to Keys commercial loan portfolio. The overall growth in the commercial loan portfolio
was geographically broad-based and spread among a number of industry sectors.
Commercial real estate loans. Commercial real estate loans for both owner- and nonowner-occupied
properties constitute one of the largest segments of Keys commercial loan portfolio. At June 30,
2008, Keys commercial real estate portfolio included mortgage loans of $10.7 billion and
construction loans of $7.8 billion. The average mortgage loan originated during the first half of
2008 was $2 million, and the largest mortgage loan at June 30, 2008, had a balance of $66 million.
At June 30, 2008, the average construction loan commitment was $6 million. The largest
construction loan commitment was $77 million, of which the entire amount was outstanding and on
nonperforming status.
Keys commercial real estate lending business is conducted through two primary sources: a 14-state
banking franchise, and Real Estate Capital and Corporate Banking Services, a national line of
business that cultivates relationships both within and beyond the branch system. This line of
business deals exclusively with nonowner-occupied properties (generally properties for which at
least 50% of the debt service is provided by rental income from nonaffiliated third parties) and
accounted for approximately 64% of Keys average commercial real estate loans during the second
quarter of 2008. Keys commercial real estate business generally focuses on larger real estate
developers and, as shown in Figure 19, is diversified by both industry type and geographic location
of the underlying collateral.
Figure 19. Commercial Real Estate Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
Geographic Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
dollars in millions |
|
Northeast |
|
|
Southeast |
|
|
Southwest |
|
|
Midwest |
|
|
Central |
|
|
West |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Nonowner-occupied: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential properties |
|
$ |
432 |
|
|
$ |
850 |
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
139 |
|
|
$ |
290 |
|
|
$ |
904 |
|
|
$ |
2,715 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
% |
Retail properties |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
849 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
2,584 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
Multifamily properties |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
2,405 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
Office buildings |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
1,281 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
Land and development |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
Health facilities |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
Warehouses |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
Hotels/Motels |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Manufacturing facilities |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
.5 |
|
Other |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
836 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,821 |
|
|
|
3,071 |
|
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
1,682 |
|
|
|
1,876 |
|
|
|
3,092 |
|
|
|
12,654 |
|
|
|
68.1 |
|
Owner-occupied |
|
|
1,237 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
2,049 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
1,848 |
|
|
|
5,932 |
|
|
|
31.9 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,058 |
|
|
$ |
3,258 |
|
|
$ |
1,206 |
|
|
$ |
3,731 |
|
|
$ |
2,393 |
|
|
$ |
4,940 |
|
|
$ |
18,586 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonowner-occupied: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans |
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
$ |
323 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
Accruing loans past due 30 through 89 days |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
Northeast |
|
Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania,
Rhode Island and Vermont |
Southeast |
|
Alabama, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North
Carolina,
South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, Washington D.C. and West Virginia |
Southwest |
|
Arizona, Nevada and New Mexico |
Midwest |
|
Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North
Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota
and Wisconsin |
Central |
|
Arkansas, Colorado, Oklahoma, Texas and Utah
|
West |
|
Alaska, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Washington and Wyoming |
|
N/M = Not Meaningful |
65
During the past twelve months, nonperforming loans related to Keys nonowner-occupied properties
rose by $295 million, due primarily to deteriorating market conditions in the residential
properties segment of Keys commercial real estate construction portfolio. The majority of the
increase in this segment came from loans outstanding in Florida and southern California. As
previously reported, Key has undertaken a process to reduce its exposure in the residential
properties segment of its construction loan portfolio through the planned sale of certain loans.
In conjunction with these efforts, Key transferred $384 million of commercial real estate loans
($719 million of primarily construction loans, net of $335 million in net charge-offs) from the
loan portfolio to held-for-sale status in June 2008. As of June 30, 2008, sales had closed on $44
million of these loans. With respect to the balance, Key is working with bidders to finalize sales
terms and documentation, and management anticipates that sales of the majority of the remaining
$340 million of loans, which are on nonperforming status, will close during the third quarter.
Commercial lease financing. Management believes Key has both the scale and array of products to
compete in the specialty of equipment lease financing. Key conducts these financing arrangements
through the Equipment Finance line of business. Commercial lease financing receivables represented
18% of commercial loans at June 30, 2008, compared to 21% at June 30, 2007.
Consumer loan portfolio
Consumer loans outstanding increased by $3.8 billion, or 21%, from one year ago. As stated
previously, in March 2008, Key transferred $3.3 billion of education loans from held-for-sale
status to the loan portfolio. The secondary markets for these loans have been adversely affected
by market liquidity issues, prompting the companys decision to move them to a held-to-maturity
classification. Adjusting for this transfer, consumer loans were up $549 million, or 3%, from the
year-ago quarter, due primarily to the January 1, 2008, acquisition
of U.S.B. Holding Co., Inc.
The home equity portfolio is by far the largest segment of Keys consumer loan portfolio. A
significant amount of this portfolio (90% at June 30, 2008) is derived primarily from the Regional
Banking line of business within the Community Banking group; the
remainder originated from the Consumer Finance line of business
within the National Banking group.
Management expects the level of the home equity portfolio to decrease in the future as a result of
Keys December 2007 decision to exit dealer-originated home improvement lending activities, which
are largely out-of-footprint.
Figure 20 summarizes Keys home equity loan portfolio by source at the end of each of the last five
quarters, as well as certain asset quality statistics and yields on the portfolio as a whole.
Figure 20. Home Equity Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
dollars in millions |
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
SOURCES OF PERIOD-END LOANS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Banking |
|
$ |
9,851 |
|
|
$ |
9,678 |
|
|
$ |
9,655 |
|
|
$ |
9,674 |
|
|
$ |
9,736 |
|
National
Banking |
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
|
1,262 |
|
|
|
1,230 |
|
|
|
1,143 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
11,004 |
|
|
$ |
10,898 |
|
|
$ |
10,917 |
|
|
$ |
10,904 |
|
|
$ |
10,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans at period end |
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
$ |
66 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
Net loan charge-offs for the period |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Yield for the period a |
|
|
5.99 |
% |
|
|
6.54 |
% |
|
|
7.02 |
% |
|
|
7.22 |
% |
|
|
7.22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
From continuing operations. |
Loans held for sale
As shown in Note 6 (Loans and Loans Held for Sale), which begins on page 21, Keys loans held for
sale were $1.8 billion at June 30, 2008, compared to $4.7 billion at December 31, 2007, and $4.5
billion at June 30, 2007. The decrease was attributable to the transfer of the education loans
from held-for-sale status to the loan portfolio and the sales of commercial real estate loans.
Adjusting for the transfer, loans held for sale were up $571 million, or 13%, from the year-ago
quarter due in part to the June 2008 transfer of commercial real estate loans from the loan
portfolio to held-for-sale status.
66
At June 30, 2008, Keys loans held for sale included $994 million of commercial mortgage loans. In
the absence of quoted market prices, management uses valuation models to measure the fair value of
these loans and adjusts the amount recorded on the balance sheet if fair value falls below recorded
cost. The models are based on assumptions related to prepayment speeds, default rates, funding
cost and discount rates. In light of the volatility in the financial markets, management has
reviewed Keys assumptions and determined they reflect current market conditions. As a result, no
significant adjustments to the assumptions were required during the first half of 2008.
During the first six months of 2008, Key recorded net unrealized losses of $79 million and net
realized gains of $3 million on its loans held for sale portfolio. Key records these transactions
in net gains (losses) from loan securitizations and sales on the income statement. Key has not
been significantly impacted by market volatility in the subprime mortgage lending industry because
it sold the $2.5 billion subprime mortgage loan portfolio held by the Champion Mortgage finance
business in November 2006.
Sales and securitizations
Key
continues to utilize alternative funding sources like loan sales and securitizations to support its
loan origination capabilities. In addition, certain acquisitions completed over the past several
years have improved Keys ability under favorable market conditions to originate and sell new
loans, and to securitize and service loans generated by others, especially in the area of
commercial real estate.
During the past twelve months, Key sold $3.0 billion of commercial real estate loans, $628 million
of residential real estate loans, $320 million of commercial loans and leases, and $178 million of
education loans. Most of these sales came from the held-for-sale portfolio. Due to unfavorable
market conditions, Key did not proceed with an education loan securitization during 2007 and does
not anticipate entering into any securitizations of this type during 2008.
Among the factors that Key considers in determining which loans to sell or securitize are:
¨ |
|
whether particular lending businesses meet established performance standards or fit with Keys relationship banking
strategy; |
|
¨ |
|
Keys asset/liability management needs; |
|
¨ |
|
whether the characteristics of a specific loan portfolio make it conducive to securitization; |
|
¨ |
|
the cost of alternative funding sources; |
|
¨ |
|
the level of credit risk; |
|
¨ |
|
capital requirements; and |
|
¨ |
|
market conditions and pricing. |
67
Figure 21 summarizes Keys loan sales (including securitizations) for the first six months of 2008
and all of 2007.
Figure 21. Loans Sold (Including Loans Held for Sale)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Residential |
|
|
Home |
|
|
National |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in millions |
|
Commercial |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Lease Financing |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Banking |
|
|
Education |
|
|
Total |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second quarter |
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
761 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
1,069 |
|
First quarter |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
965 |
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
$ |
1,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth quarter |
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
965 |
|
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
1,275 |
|
Third quarter |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
1,282 |
|
Second quarter |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
1,449 |
|
First quarter |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
$ |
233 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
$ |
3,791 |
|
|
$ |
268 |
|
|
$ |
463 |
|
|
$ |
233 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
247 |
|
|
$ |
5,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 22 shows loans that are either administered or serviced by Key, but not recorded on the
balance sheet. The table includes loans that have been both securitized and sold, or simply sold
outright.
Figure 22. Loans Administered or Serviced
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Commercial real estate loans a |
|
$ |
128,010 |
|
|
$ |
130,645 |
|
|
$ |
134,982 |
|
|
$ |
134,510 |
|
|
$ |
121,384 |
|
Education loans |
|
|
4,474 |
|
|
|
4,592 |
|
|
|
4,722 |
|
|
|
4,984 |
|
|
|
5,118 |
|
Commercial lease financing |
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
762 |
|
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
Commercial loans |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
133,491 |
|
|
$ |
136,226 |
|
|
$ |
140,723 |
|
|
$ |
140,379 |
|
|
$ |
127,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Key acquired the servicing for commercial mortgage loan portfolios with an aggregate
principal balance of $738 million for the second quarter 2008, $345 million for the first
quarter 2008, $5.3 billion for the fourth quarter 2007, $21.1 billion for the third quarter
2007 and $6.4 billion for the second quarter 2007. |
In the event of default by a borrower, Key is subject to recourse with respect to approximately
$632 million of the $133.5 billion of loans administered or serviced at June 30, 2008. Additional
information about this recourse arrangement is included in Note 13 (Contingent Liabilities and
Guarantees) under the heading Recourse agreement with Federal National Mortgage Association on
page 30.
Key derives income from several sources when retaining the right to administer or service loans
that are securitized or sold. Key earns noninterest income (recorded as other income) from fees
for servicing or administering loans. This fee income is reduced by the amortization of related
servicing assets. In addition, Key earns interest income from securitized assets retained and from
investing funds generated by escrow deposits collected in connection with the servicing of
commercial real estate loans.
Securities
At June 30, 2008, the securities portfolio totaled $8.3 billion, compared to $7.9 billion at
December 31, 2007, and June 30, 2007. At each of these dates, almost the entire securities
portfolio was securities available for sale, with the remainder consisting of held-to-maturity
securities of less than $40 million.
Securities available for sale. The majority of Keys securities available-for-sale portfolio
consists of collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs). A CMO is a debt security that is secured
by a pool of
68
mortgages or mortgage-backed securities. Keys CMOs generate interest income and
serve as collateral to support certain pledging agreements. At June 30, 2008, Key had $7.9 billion
invested in CMOs and other mortgage-backed securities in the available-for-sale portfolio, compared
to $7.6 billion at December 31, 2007, and $7.4 billion at June 30, 2007.
Management periodically evaluates Keys securities available-for-sale portfolio in light of
established asset/liability management objectives, changing market conditions that could affect the
profitability of the portfolio, and the level of interest rate risk to which Key is exposed. These
evaluations may cause management to take steps to improve Keys overall balance sheet positioning.
In March 2007, management completed a comprehensive evaluation of the securities available-for-sale
portfolio and determined that a repositioning of the portfolio was appropriate to enhance future
financial performance, particularly in the event of a decline in interest rates. As a result, Key
sold $2.4 billion of shorter-maturity CMOs and reinvested the proceeds in mortgage-backed
securities with higher yields and longer expected average maturities. The repositioning also
reduced Keys exposure to prepayment risk if interest rates decline by replacing the CMOs sold with
CMOs whose underlying mortgage loans have shorter maturities and lower coupon rates. Key maintains
a modest liability-sensitive exposure to near-term changes in interest rates. Neither funding nor
capital levels were affected materially by this portfolio repositioning.
As a result of the sale of CMOs, Key recorded a net realized loss of $49 million ($31 million after
tax, or $.08 per diluted common share) during the first quarter of 2007. This net loss was
previously recorded in net unrealized losses on securities available for sale in the accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) component of shareholders equity.
In addition to changing market conditions, the size and composition of Keys securities
available-for-sale portfolio could vary with Keys needs for liquidity and the extent to which Key
is required (or elects) to hold these assets as collateral to secure public funds and trust
deposits. Although Key generally uses debt securities for this purpose, other assets, such as
securities purchased under resale agreements, are occasionally used when they provide more
favorable yields or risk profiles.
As shown in Figure 23, all of Keys mortgage-backed securities are issued by government sponsored
enterprises or the Government National Mortgage Association, and are traded in highly liquid
secondary markets. For more than 99% of these securities, management employs an outside bond
pricing service to determine the fair value at which they should be recorded on the balance sheet.
In performing the valuations, the pricing service relies on models that consider security-specific
details as well as relevant industry and economic factors. The most significant of these inputs
are quoted market prices, interest rate spreads on relevant benchmark securities and certain
prepayment assumptions. Management uses a purchased pricing model, along with inputs similar to
those described above, to value a small portion (less than $5 million) of Keys mortgage-backed
securities. Management must make additional assumptions beyond those relied upon by the pricing
service for these aged securities. The valuations derived from the models are reviewed by
management for reasonableness to ensure they are consistent with the values placed on similar
securities traded in the secondary markets.
Figure 23. Mortgage-Backed Securities by Issuer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation |
|
$ |
4,675 |
|
|
$ |
4,566 |
|
|
$ |
4,553 |
|
Federal National Mortgage Association |
|
|
2,875 |
|
|
|
2,748 |
|
|
|
2,605 |
|
Government National Mortgage Association |
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,934 |
|
|
$ |
7,570 |
|
|
$ |
7,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
For the first half of 2008, net gains from Keys mortgage-backed securities totaled $33 million.
These net gains include net unrealized gains of $32 million, caused by the decline in benchmark
Treasury yields, offset in part by the widening of interest rate spreads on these securities. Key
records the net unrealized gains in the accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) component
of shareholders equity and records the net realized gains in net securities (losses) gains on
the income statement.
Figure 24 shows the composition, yields and remaining maturities of Keys securities available for
sale. For more information about securities, including gross unrealized gains and losses by type
of security, see Note 5 (Securities), which begins on page 19.
Figure 24. Securities Available for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury, |
|
|
States and |
|
|
Collateralized |
|
|
Mortgage- |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted - |
|
|
|
Agencies and |
|
|
Political |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Backed |
|
|
Interests in |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
dollars in millions |
|
Corporations |
|
|
Subdivisions |
|
|
Obligations a |
|
|
Securities a |
|
|
Securitizations a |
|
|
Securities b |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Yield c |
|
|
JUNE 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year or less |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
|
3.96 |
% |
After one through five years |
|
|
6 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
|
6,179 |
|
|
|
1,445 |
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
7,780 |
|
|
|
5.07 |
|
After five through ten years |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
7.15 |
|
After ten years |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
5.84 |
|
|
Fair value |
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
$ |
6,350 |
|
|
$ |
1,584 |
|
|
$ |
187 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
8,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
6,309 |
|
|
|
1,583 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
8,237 |
|
|
|
5.19 |
% |
Weighted-average yield c |
|
|
3.86 |
% |
|
|
5.79 |
% |
|
|
4.89 |
% |
|
|
5.08 |
% |
|
|
18.17 |
% |
|
|
5.11 |
%d |
|
|
5.19 |
%d |
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average maturity |
|
5.2 years |
|
|
8.6 years |
|
|
3.2 years |
|
|
4.5 years |
|
|
4.9 years |
|
|
4.2 years |
|
|
3.5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
DECEMBER 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
6,167 |
|
|
$ |
1,403 |
|
|
$ |
185 |
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
$ |
7,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
6,167 |
|
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
7,810 |
|
|
|
5.22 |
% |
|
JUNE 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
6,313 |
|
|
$ |
1,113 |
|
|
$ |
193 |
|
|
$ |
169 |
|
|
$ |
7,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
6,421 |
|
|
|
1,133 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
7,881 |
|
|
|
5.24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Maturity is based upon expected average lives rather than contractual terms. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes primarily marketable equity securities. |
|
(c) |
|
Weighted-average yields are calculated based on amortized cost. Such yields have been
adjusted to a taxable-equivalent basis using the statutory federal income tax rate of 35%. |
|
(d) |
|
Excludes securities of $78 million at June 30, 2008, that have no stated yield. |
Held-to-maturity securities. Foreign bonds, preferred equity securities and securities issued by
states and political subdivisions comprise Keys held-to-maturity portfolio. Figure 25 shows the
composition, yields and remaining maturities of these securities.
70
Figure 25. Held-to-Maturity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted - |
|
|
|
Political |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
dollars in millions |
|
Subdivisions |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Yield a |
|
|
JUNE 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year or less |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
|
6.82 |
% |
After one through five years |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
6.11 |
|
|
Amortized cost |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
|
6.51 |
% |
Fair value |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average yield a |
|
|
8.39 |
% |
|
|
4.93 |
%b |
|
|
6.51 |
%b |
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average maturity |
|
1.4 years |
|
|
1.6 years |
|
|
1.5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
DECEMBER 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
|
6.84 |
% |
Fair value |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
JUNE 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost |
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
7.15 |
% |
Fair value |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Weighted-average yields are calculated based on amortized cost. Such yields have
been adjusted to a taxable-equivalent basis using the statutory federal income tax
rate of 35%. |
|
(b) |
|
Excludes securities of $8 million at June 30, 2008, that have no stated yield. |
Other investments
Principal investments ¾ investments in equity and mezzanine instruments made by Keys
Principal Investing unit ¾ represent 66% of other investments at June 30, 2008. They include
direct investments (investments made in a particular company), as well as indirect investments
(investments made through funds that include other investors). Principal investments are
predominantly made in privately held companies and are carried at fair value ($1.0 billion at June
30, 2008, $993 million at December 31, 2007, and $975 million at June 30, 2007).
In addition to principal investments, other investments include other equity and mezzanine
instruments, such as certain real estate-related investments that are carried at fair value, as
well as other types of investments that generally are carried at cost.
Most of Keys other investments are not traded on a ready market. Management determines the fair
value at which these investments should be recorded based on the nature of the specific investment,
and all available information and relevant facts about the issuers performance. Managements
review may encompass such factors as the issuers past financial performance and future potential,
the values of public companies in comparable businesses, the risks associated with the particular
business or investment type, current market conditions, the nature and duration of resale
restrictions, the issuers payment history, managements knowledge of the industry and other
relevant factors. For the first six months of 2008, net losses from Keys principal investing
activities totaled $5 million, which included $76 million of net unrealized losses. Key records
these net losses as net (losses) gains from principal investing on the income statement.
Deposits and other sources of funds
Core deposits domestic deposits other than certificates of deposit of $100,000 or
more are Keys primary source of funding. These deposits generally are stable, have
a relatively low cost and typically
react more slowly to changes in interest rates than market-based deposits. During the second
quarter of 2008, core deposits averaged $52.3 billion, and represented 58% of the funds Key used to
support loans and other earning assets, compared to $50.6 billion and 62% during the same quarter
in 2007. The composition of Keys deposits is shown in Figure 10, which spans pages 57 and 58.
71
The increase in average core deposits compared to the second quarter of 2007 was attributable to
growth in Negotiable Order of Withdrawal (NOW) and money market deposits accounts, savings
deposits and certificates of deposit, offset in part by a decline in noninterest-bearing deposits.
The growth in and change in composition of core deposits were attributable to several factors.
¨ |
|
The January 1, 2008, acquisition of U.S.B. Holding Co., Inc. added
approximately $1.7 billion to Keys average core deposits for the
current quarter. Adjusting for the acquisition of U.S.B. Holding
Co., Inc., the level of average core deposits was essentially
unchanged from the second quarter of 2007. |
|
¨ |
|
The increase in NOW and money market deposits accounts and the
decrease in noninterest-bearing deposits reflect actions taken by
Key in November 2007 to reduce its deposit reserve requirement by
converting approximately $3.4 billion of noninterest-bearing
deposits to NOW and money market deposit accounts. |
|
¨ |
|
Competition for deposits in the markets in which Key operates
remains strong, and consumer preferences shifted more to
certificates of deposit as a result of the declining interest rate
environment. |
Purchased funds, comprising large certificates of deposit, deposits in the foreign office and
short-term borrowings, averaged $20.8 billion in the second quarter of 2008, compared to $16.4
billion during the year-ago quarter. The significant increase was attributable to growth in large
certificate of deposits, foreign office deposits, and bank notes and other short-term borrowings.
During the current year, Key has used purchased funds more heavily to accommodate borrowers
increased reliance on commercial lines of credit in the volatile capital markets environment.
Capital
Shareholders equity. Total shareholders equity at June 30, 2008, was $8.7 billion, up $960
million from December 31, 2007. Factors contributing to the change in shareholders equity during
the first six months of 2008 are shown in the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders
Equity presented on page 5.
During the second quarter of 2008, Key took several actions to further strengthen its capital
position in light of charges recorded in connection with the adverse federal court decision in the
AWG Leasing Litigation. KeyCorp issued $650 million, or 6.5 million shares, of noncumulative
perpetual convertible preferred stock with a liquidation value of $100 per share, and $1.0 billion,
or 85.1 million shares, of additional common stock. Further, Keys Board of Directors announced
its intention to reduce the dividend on Keys common shares by 50% to an annualized dividend of
$.75 per share, commencing with the dividend payable in the third quarter of 2008.
As part of the over allotment granted by KeyCorp to the underwriters in conjunction with the
issuance of preferred stock and common shares, Key issued 7 million additional common shares and
75,000 additional shares of noncumulative perpetual convertible preferred stock on July 11, 2008.
The proceeds received as a result of these issuances totaled approximately $90 million, and
represented approximately 9 basis points of additional Tier 1 and
total risk-based capital.
Common shares outstanding. Figure 26 shows activities that caused the change in Keys outstanding
common shares over the past five quarters.
72
Figure 26. Changes in Common Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
in thousands |
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Shares outstanding at beginning of period |
|
|
400,071 |
|
|
|
388,793 |
|
|
|
388,708 |
|
|
|
389,362 |
|
|
|
394,483 |
|
Common shares issued |
|
|
85,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares reissued to acquire U.S.B. Holding Co., Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares reissued under employee benefit plans |
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
1,383 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
1,346 |
|
|
|
879 |
|
Common shares repurchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
(6,000 |
) |
|
Shares outstanding at end of period |
|
|
485,662 |
|
|
|
400,071 |
|
|
|
388,793 |
|
|
|
388,708 |
|
|
|
389,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key repurchases its common shares periodically in the open market or through privately negotiated
transactions under a repurchase program authorized by the Board of Directors. The program does not
have an expiration date. Key did not repurchase any shares during the first half of 2008 and
management does not expect to initiate any corporate share repurchases during the remainder of the
year. At June 30, 2008, 14.0 million shares were remaining
for repurchase under Board authority.
At June 30, 2008, Key had 91.3 million treasury shares. Management expects to reissue those shares
as needed in connection with stock-based compensation awards and for other corporate purposes. On
January 1, 2008, Key reissued 9.9 million of its common shares in connection with the acquisition
of U.S.B. Holding Co., Inc. Additionally, during the first half of 2008, Key reissued 1.9 million
shares under employee benefit plans.
Capital availability. As a result of the recent market disruptions, the availability of capital
(principally to financial services companies) has become significantly restricted. While some
companies, such as Key, have been successful in raising additional capital, the cost of that
capital has been substantially higher than the prevailing market rate prior to the volatility.
Management cannot predict when or if the markets will return to more favorable conditions.
As discussed on page 72, during the second quarter of 2008 and subsequent month of July, Key raised
additional capital of $1.74 billion through the issuance of both noncumulative perpetual
convertible preferred stock and common shares. In addition, Keys Board of Directors announced its
intention to reduce the dividend on Keys common shares commencing with the dividend payable in the
third quarter of 2008. These actions were taken to further strengthen Keys capital position in
light of the adverse federal court decision in the AWG Leasing Litigation, and to position Key to
respond to future business opportunities as they emerge.
Capital adequacy. Capital adequacy is an important indicator of financial stability and
performance. Keys ratio of total shareholders equity to total assets was 8.57% at June 30, 2008,
compared to 7.89% at December 31, 2007, and 8.28% at June 30, 2007. Keys ratio of tangible equity
to tangible assets was 6.98% at June 30, 2008. Management believes Keys capital position provides
sufficient flexibility to take advantage of investment opportunities and to pay dividends.
Banking industry regulators prescribe minimum capital ratios for bank holding companies and their
banking subsidiaries. Note 14 (Shareholders Equity), which begins on page 87 of Keys 2007
Annual Report to Shareholders, explains the implications of failing to meet these specific capital
requirements.
Risk-based capital guidelines require a minimum level of capital as a percent of risk-weighted
assets. Risk-weighted assets consist of total assets plus certain off-balance sheet items, subject
to adjustment for predefined credit risk factors. Currently, banks and bank holding companies must
maintain, at a minimum, Tier 1 capital as a percent of risk-weighted assets of 4.00%, and total
capital as a percent of risk-weighted assets of 8.00%. As of June 30, 2008, Keys Tier 1 capital
ratio was 8.53%, and its total capital ratio was 12.41%.
Another indicator of capital adequacy, the leverage ratio, is defined as Tier 1 capital as a
percentage of average quarterly tangible assets. Leverage ratio requirements vary with the
condition of the financial institution. Bank holding companies that either have the highest
supervisory rating or have implemented
73
the Federal Reserves risk-adjusted measure for market risk
as KeyCorp has must maintain a minimum
leverage ratio of 3.00%. All other bank holding companies must maintain a minimum ratio of 4.00%.
As of June 30, 2008, Key had a leverage ratio of 9.34%.
Federal bank regulators group FDIC-insured depository institutions into five categories, ranging
from critically undercapitalized to well capitalized. Keys affiliate bank, KeyBank, qualified
as well capitalized at June 30, 2008, since it exceeded the prescribed thresholds of 10.00% for
total capital, 6.00% for Tier 1 capital and 5.00% for the leverage ratio. If these provisions
applied to bank holding companies, Key also would qualify as well capitalized at June 30, 2008.
The FDIC-defined capital categories serve a limited supervisory function. Investors should not
treat them as a representation of the overall financial condition or prospects of KeyCorp or
KeyBank.
Figure 27 presents the details of Keys regulatory capital position at June 30, 2008, December 31,
2007, and June 30, 2007.
Figure 27. Capital Components and Risk-Weighted Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
dollars in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
TIER 1 CAPITAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shareholders equity a |
|
$ |
8,627 |
|
|
$ |
7,687 |
|
|
$ |
7,923 |
|
Qualifying capital securities |
|
|
2,582 |
|
|
|
1,857 |
|
|
|
1,792 |
|
Less: Goodwill |
|
|
1,598 |
|
|
|
1,252 |
|
|
|
1,202 |
|
Other assets b |
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
Total Tier 1 capital |
|
|
9,390 |
|
|
|
8,095 |
|
|
|
8,336 |
|
|
TIER 2 CAPITAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for losses on loans and liability for losses on
lending-related commitments c |
|
|
1,385 |
|
|
|
1,280 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
Net unrealized gains on equity securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Qualifying long-term debt |
|
|
2,879 |
|
|
|
3,003 |
|
|
|
3,107 |
|
|
Total Tier 2 capital |
|
|
4,264 |
|
|
|
4,285 |
|
|
|
4,110 |
|
|
Total risk-based capital |
|
$ |
13,654 |
|
|
$ |
12,380 |
|
|
$ |
12,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RISK-WEIGHTED ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-weighted assets on balance sheet |
|
$ |
85,600 |
|
|
$ |
83,758 |
|
|
$ |
78,971 |
|
Risk-weighted off-balance sheet exposure |
|
|
25,510 |
|
|
|
25,676 |
|
|
|
24,455 |
|
Less: Goodwill |
|
|
1,598 |
|
|
|
1,252 |
|
|
|
1,202 |
|
Other assets b |
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
755 |
|
Plus: Market risk-equivalent assets |
|
|
1,606 |
|
|
|
1,525 |
|
|
|
962 |
|
|
Gross risk-weighted assets |
|
|
110,114 |
|
|
|
108,745 |
|
|
|
102,431 |
|
Less: Excess allowance for loan losses c |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net risk-weighted assets |
|
$ |
110,027 |
|
|
$ |
108,745 |
|
|
$ |
102,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AVERAGE QUARTERLY TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
103,128 |
|
|
$ |
98,728 |
|
|
$ |
93,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL RATIOS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio |
|
|
8.53 |
% |
|
|
7.44 |
% |
|
|
8.14 |
% |
Total risk-based capital ratio |
|
|
12.41 |
|
|
|
11.38 |
|
|
|
12.15 |
|
Leverage ratio d |
|
|
9.34 |
|
|
|
8.39 |
|
|
|
9.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Common shareholders equity does not include net unrealized gains or losses on securities
available for sale (except for net unrealized losses on marketable equity securities), net
gains or losses on cash flow hedges, or the amount resulting from the adoption of SFAS No.
158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans. |
|
(b) |
|
Other assets deducted from Tier 1 capital and risk-weighted assets consist of intangible
assets (excluding goodwill) recorded after February 19, 1992, and deductible portions of
nonfinancial equity investments. |
|
(c) |
|
The allowance for loan losses included in Tier 2 capital is limited by regulation to 1.25% of
the sum of gross risk-weighted assets plus low level exposures and residual interests
calculated under the direct reduction method, as defined by the Federal Reserve. |
|
(d) |
|
This ratio is Tier 1 capital divided by average quarterly total assets less: (i) goodwill,
(ii) the nonqualifying intangible assets described in footnote (b), (iii) deductible
portions of nonfinancial equity investments, and (iv) net unrealized gains or losses on
securities available for sale; plus assets derecognized as an offset to accumulated other
comprehensive income resulting from the adoption and application of SFAS No. 158. |
74
Risk Management
Overview
Like other financial services companies, Key engages in business activities with inherent risks.
The ability to properly and effectively identify, measure, monitor and report such risks is
essential to maintaining safety and soundness and to maximizing profitability. Management believes
that the most significant risks facing Key are market risk, liquidity risk, credit risk and
operational risk, and that these risks must be managed across the entire enterprise. Key continues
to enhance its Enterprise Risk Management practices and program, and uses a risk adjusted capital
framework to manage these risks. This framework is approved and managed by the Risk Capital
Committee, which consists of senior finance, risk management and business executives. Each type of
risk is defined and discussed in greater detail in the remainder of this section.
Keys Board of Directors has established and follows a corporate governance program that serves as
the foundation for managing and mitigating risk. In accordance with this program, the Board
focuses on the interests of shareholders, encourages strong internal controls, demands management
accountability, mandates adherence to Keys code of ethics and administers an annual
self-assessment process. The Audit and Risk Management committees help the Board meet these risk
oversight responsibilities. The responsibilities of these two committees are summarized on page 46
of Keys 2007 Annual Report to Shareholders.
Market risk management
The values of some financial instruments vary not only with changes in market interest rates but
also with changes in foreign exchange rates. Financial instruments also are susceptible to factors
influencing valuations in the equity securities markets and other market-driven rates or prices.
For example, the value of a fixed-rate bond will decline if market interest rates increase.
Similarly, the value of the U.S. dollar regularly fluctuates in relation to other currencies. When
the value of an instrument is tied to such external factors, the holder faces market risk. Most
of Keys market risk is derived from interest rate fluctuations.
Interest rate risk management
Interest rate risk, which is inherent in the banking industry, is measured by the potential for
fluctuations in net interest income and the economic value of equity. Such fluctuations may result
from changes in interest rates and differences in the repricing and maturity characteristics of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. To minimize the volatility of net
interest income and the economic value of equity, Key manages exposure to interest rate risk in
accordance with guidelines established by the Asset/Liability Management Committee (ALCO). This
committee, which consists of senior finance and business executives, meets monthly and periodically
reports Keys interest rate risk positions to the Risk Management Committee of the Board of
Directors.
Interest rate risk positions can be influenced by a number of factors other than changes in market
interest rates, including economic conditions, the competitive environment within Keys markets,
consumer preferences for specific loan and deposit products, and the level of interest rate
exposure arising from basis risk, gap risk, yield curve risk and option risk. Each of these types
of risk is defined in the discussion of market risk management, which begins on page 46 of Keys
2007 Annual Report to Shareholders.
Net interest income simulation analysis. The primary tool management uses to measure Keys
interest rate risk is simulation analysis. For purposes of this analysis, management estimates
Keys net interest income based on the composition of its on- and off-balance sheet positions and
the current interest rate environment. The simulation assumes that growth in Keys on- and
off-balance sheet positions will reflect recent product trends, as well as consensus economic
forecasts.
75
The amount of net interest income at risk is measured by simulating the change in the level of net
interest income that would occur if the Federal Funds Target rate were to gradually increase or
decrease by 200
basis points over the next twelve months, and term rates were to move in a similar fashion, but not
as dramatically. Short-term interest rates were relatively low at June 30, 2008, and as a result
management modified the standard rate scenario of a gradual decrease of 200 basis points over
twelve months to a gradual decrease of 150 basis points over nine months and no change over the
following three months. Management then compares the amount of net interest income at risk to the
base case of an unchanged interest rate environment. The analysis also considers sensitivity to
changes in a number of other variables, including other market interest rates and deposit mix. In
addition, management assesses the potential effect of different shapes in the yield curve,
including a sustained flat yield curve and an inverted slope yield curve. (The yield curve depicts
the relationship between the yield on a particular type of security and its term to maturity.)
Management also performs stress tests to measure the effect on net interest income of an immediate
change in market interest rates, as well as changes in assumptions related to the pricing of
deposits without contractual maturities, prepayments on loans and securities, and loan and deposit
growth.
Simulation analysis produces only a sophisticated estimate of interest rate exposure based on
assumptions and judgments related to balance sheet growth, customer behavior, new products, new
business volume, pricing and anticipated hedging activities. Management tailors the assumptions to
the specific interest rate environment and yield curve shape being modeled, and validates those
assumptions on a periodic basis. Consistent with current practice, simulations are performed with
the assumption that interest rate risk positions will be actively managed through the use of on-
and off-balance sheet financial instruments to achieve the desired risk profile. Actual results
may differ from those derived in simulation analysis due to the timing, magnitude and frequency of
interest rate changes, actual hedging strategies employed, changes in balance sheet composition,
and the possible effects of unanticipated or unknown events.
Figure 28 presents the results of the simulation analysis at June 30, 2008 and 2007. At June 30,
2008, Keys simulated exposure to a change in short-term rates was modestly liability-sensitive and
slightly higher than the comparable risk measure at June 30, 2007. ALCO policy guidelines for risk
management call for corrective measures if simulation modeling demonstrates that a gradual increase
or decrease in short-term rates over the next twelve months would adversely affect net interest
income over the same period by more than 2%. As shown in Figure 28, Key is operating within these
guidelines.
Figure 28. Simulated Change in Net Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis point change assumption (short-term rates) |
|
|
-150 |
|
|
|
+200 |
|
ALCO policy guidelines |
|
|
-2.00 |
% |
|
|
-2.00 |
% |
|
Interest rate risk assessment |
|
|
+1.30 |
% |
|
|
-.96 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis point change assumption (short-term rates) |
|
|
-200 |
|
|
|
+200 |
|
ALCO policy guidelines |
|
|
-2.00 |
% |
|
|
-2.00 |
% |
|
Interest rate risk assessment |
|
|
+1.45 |
% |
|
|
-.32 |
% |
|
Throughout 2007, Keys interest rate risk exposure gradually changed from relatively neutral to
modestly liability-sensitive, with the potential to fluctuate between higher or lower levels of
risk, depending on the assumed change in short-term interest rates and the accuracy of managements
assumptions related to product pricing and customer behavior. From September 2007 through April
2008, the Federal Reserve reduced the federal funds target rate by 325 basis points. Although the
timing and magnitude of further interest rate reductions is uncertain, Keys current positioning is
consistent with its long-term bias to be modestly liability-sensitive, which will help protect net
interest income in a declining interest rate environment. Key proactively evaluates the need to
revise its interest rate risk profile as changes occur in business flows and the outlook for the
economy.
Management also conducts simulations that measure the effect of changes in market interest rates in
the second year of a two-year horizon. These simulations are conducted in a manner similar to
those based on a twelve-month horizon. To capture longer-term exposures, management simulates
changes to the economic value of equity as discussed in the following section.
76
Economic value of equity modeling. Economic value of equity (EVE) complements net interest
income simulation analysis since it provides estimates of risk exposure beyond twelve and
twenty-four month horizons. EVE measures the extent to which the economic values of assets,
liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments may change in response to changes in interest rates.
EVE is calculated by subjecting the balance sheet to an immediate 200 basis point increase or
decrease in interest rates, and measuring the resulting change in the values of assets and
liabilities. This analysis is highly dependent upon assumptions applied to assets and liabilities
with noncontractual maturities. Those assumptions are based on historical behaviors, as well as
managements expectations. Management takes corrective measures so that Keys EVE will not
decrease by more than 15% in response to an immediate 200 basis point increase or decrease in
interest rates. Key is operating within these guidelines.
Management of interest rate exposure. Management uses the results of its various simulation
analyses to formulate strategies to achieve the desired risk profile within the parameters of Keys
capital and liquidity guidelines. Specifically, management actively manages interest rate risk
positions by purchasing securities, issuing term debt with floating or fixed interest rates, and
using derivatives predominantly in the form of interest rate swaps, which modify the interest
rate characteristics of certain assets and liabilities.
Figure 29 shows all swap positions held by Key for asset/liability management (A/LM) purposes.
These positions are used to convert the contractual interest rate index of agreed-upon amounts of
assets and liabilities (i.e., notional amounts) to another interest rate index. For example,
fixed-rate debt is converted to a floating rate through a receive fixed, pay variable interest
rate swap. The volume, maturity and mix of portfolio swaps changes frequently with changes in
balance sheet positions selected to be hedged, and with changes to broader asset/liability
management objectives. For more information about how Key uses interest rate swaps to manage its
balance sheet, see Note 14 (Derivatives and Hedging Activities), which begins on page 31.
Figure 29. Portfolio Swaps by Interest Rate Risk Management Strategy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Weighted-Average Rate |
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Fair |
|
dollars in millions |
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
(Years) |
|
|
Receive |
|
|
Pay |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Receive fixed/pay variable conventional A/LM a |
|
$ |
12,488 |
|
|
$ |
162 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
$ |
7,638 |
|
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
Receive fixed/pay variable conventional debt |
|
|
6,119 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
5,163 |
|
|
|
(172 |
) |
Receive fixed/pay variable forward starting |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
3,800 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
Pay fixed/receive variable conventional debt |
|
|
1,026 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Foreign currency conventional debt |
|
|
2,659 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
3,073 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
Total portfolio swaps |
|
$ |
22,592 |
|
|
$ |
414 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
$ |
20,594 |
|
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Portfolio swaps designated as A/LM are used to manage interest rate risk tied to both assets
and liabilities. |
Trading portfolio risk management
Keys trading derivatives portfolio is described in Note 14. Management uses a value at risk
(VAR) simulation model to measure the potential adverse effect of changes in interest rates,
foreign exchange rates, equity prices and credit spreads on the fair value of Keys trading
portfolio. Using two years of historical information, the model estimates the maximum potential
one-day loss with a 95% confidence level. Statistically, this means that losses will exceed VAR,
on average, five out of 100 trading days, or three to four times each quarter.
Key manages exposure to market risk in accordance with VAR limits for trading activity that have
been approved by the Risk Capital Committee. At June 30, 2008, the aggregate one-day trading limit
set by the committee was $6.4 million. Key is operating within these constraints. During the
first six months of 2008, Keys aggregate daily average, minimum and maximum VAR amounts were $2.5
million, $1.7 million and $3.8 million, respectively. During the same period one year ago, Keys
aggregate daily average, minimum and maximum VAR amounts were $1.1 million, $.7 million and $1.8
million, respectively.
77
In addition to comparing VAR exposure against limits on a daily basis, management monitors loss
limits, uses sensitivity measures and conducts stress tests. Risk Management reports Keys market
risk exposure to Keys Risk Capital Committee and the Risk Management Committee of the Board of
Directors.
Liquidity risk management
Key defines liquidity as the ongoing ability to accommodate liability maturities and deposit
withdrawals, meet contractual obligations, and fund asset growth and new business transactions at a
reasonable cost, in a timely manner and without adverse consequences. Liquidity management
involves maintaining sufficient and diverse sources of funding to accommodate planned as well as
unanticipated changes in assets and liabilities under both normal and adverse conditions. In
addition, Key occasionally guarantees a subsidiarys obligations in transactions with third
parties. Management closely monitors the extension of such guarantees to ensure that Key retains
ample liquidity to satisfy these obligations.
Key manages liquidity for all of its affiliates on an integrated basis. This approach considers
the unique funding sources available to each entity, as well as each entitys capacity to manage
through adverse conditions. It also recognizes that adverse market conditions or other events that
could negatively affect the availability or cost of liquidity will affect the access of all
affiliates to money market funding.
Under ordinary circumstances, management monitors Keys funding sources and measures its capacity
to obtain funds in a variety of situations in an effort to maintain an appropriate mix of available
and affordable cash. Management has established guidelines or target ranges for various types of
wholesale borrowings, such as money market funding and term debt, at various maturities. In
addition, management assesses whether Key will need to rely on wholesale borrowings in the future
and develops strategies to address those needs.
Key uses several tools as described on page 49 of the 2007 Annual Report to Shareholders to
actively manage and maintain liquidity on an ongoing basis.
Key generates cash flows from operations and from investing and financing activities. Since
December 31, 2006, prepayments and maturities of securities available for sale have been the
primary sources of cash from investing activities. Securities sold in connection with the
repositioning of the securities portfolio also provided significant cash inflow during the first
quarter of 2007. Investing activities such as lending and purchases of new securities have
required the greatest use of cash.
Key relies on financing activities, such as increasing short-term or long-term borrowings, to
provide the cash flow needed to support operating and investing activities if that need is not
satisfied by deposit growth. Conversely, excess cash generated by operating, investing and
deposit-gathering activities may be used to repay outstanding debt or repurchase shares. For
example, during 2007, Key used short-term borrowings to pay down long-term debt, while the net
increase in deposits funded the growth in portfolio loans and loans held for sale.
Keys liquidity could be adversely affected by both direct and indirect circumstances. An example
of a direct event would be a downgrade in Keys public credit rating by a rating agency due to
factors such as deterioration in asset quality, a large charge to earnings, a decline in
profitability or other financial measures, or a significant merger or acquisition. Examples of
indirect events unrelated to Key that could have an effect on Keys access to liquidity would be
terrorism or war, natural disasters, political events, or the default or bankruptcy of a major
corporation, mutual fund or hedge fund. Similarly, market speculation or rumors about Key or the
banking industry in general may adversely affect the cost and availability of normal funding
sources.
Management performs stress tests to determine the effect that a potential downgrade in Keys debt
ratings or other market disruptions could have on liquidity over various time periods. These debt
ratings, which are presented in Figure 30 on page 81, have a direct impact on Keys cost of funds
and ability to raise
78
funds under normal as well as adverse conditions. The results of the stress
tests indicate that, following the occurrence of an adverse event, Key could continue to meet its
financial obligations and to fund its operations for at least one year. The stress test scenarios
include major disruptions to Keys access to
funding markets and consider the potential adverse effect on cash flows. To compensate for the
effect of these assumed liquidity pressures, management considers alternative sources of liquidity
over different time periods to project how fluctuations on the balance sheet would be managed. Key
actively manages several alternatives for enhancing liquidity, including generating client
deposits, securitizing or selling loans, extending the level or maturity of wholesale borrowings,
purchasing deposits from other banks, and developing relationships with fixed income investors in a
variety of markets. Management also measures Keys capacity to borrow using various debt
instruments and funding markets.
Certain credit markets that Key participates in and relies upon as sources of funding have been
significantly disrupted and highly volatile since July 2007. As a means of maintaining adequate
liquidity, Key, like many other financial institutions, has relied more heavily on the liquidity
and stability present in the short-term and secured credit markets since access to unsecured term
debt has been restricted. Short-term funding has been available and cost effective. However, if
further market disruption were to also reduce the cost effectiveness and availability of these
funds for a prolonged period of time, management may need to secure other funding alternatives.
Key maintains a liquidity contingency plan that outlines the process for addressing a liquidity
crisis. The plan provides for an evaluation of funding sources under various market conditions.
It also assigns specific roles and responsibilities for effectively managing liquidity through a
problem period. Key has access to various sources of money market funding (such as federal funds
purchased, securities sold under repurchase agreements, eurodollars and commercial paper), and also
has secured borrowing facilities established at the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati, the U.S.
Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland to facilitate short-term liquidity
requirements.
The Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows on page 6 summarize Keys sources and uses of cash by
type of activity for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
Liquidity for KeyCorp (the parent company or parent)
The parent company has sufficient liquidity when it can service its debt; support customary
corporate operations and activities (including acquisitions) at a reasonable cost, in a timely
manner and without adverse consequences; and pay dividends to shareholders.
Managements primary tool for assessing parent company liquidity is the net short-term cash
position, which measures the ability to fund debt maturing in twelve months or less with existing
liquid assets. Another key measure of parent company liquidity is the liquidity gap, which
represents the difference between projected liquid assets and anticipated financial obligations
over specified time horizons. Key generally relies upon the issuance of term debt to manage the
liquidity gap within targeted ranges assigned to various time periods.
The parent company has met its liquidity requirements principally through receiving regular
dividends from KeyBank. Federal banking law limits the amount of capital distributions that a bank
can make to its holding company without prior regulatory approval. A national banks
dividend-paying capacity is affected by several factors, including net profits (as defined by
statute) for the two previous calendar years and for the current year up to the date of dividend
declaration. During the first six months of 2008, KeyBank did not pay any dividends to the parent,
and nonbank subsidiaries paid the parent a total of $3 million in dividends. As of the close of
business on June 30, 2008, KeyBank would not have been permitted to pay dividends to the parent
without prior regulatory approval since the bank had a year-to-date net loss of $838 million.
During the second quarter of 2008, the parent made a $500 million capital infusion to KeyBank in
the form of cash.
79
The parent company generally maintains excess funds in interest-bearing deposits in an amount
sufficient to meet projected debt maturities over the next twelve months. At June 30, 2008, the
parent company held $2.7 billion in short-term investments, which management projected to be
sufficient to meet debt repayment obligations over a period of approximately 63 months.
During the first quarter of 2008, the KeyCorp Capital X trust issued $740 million of capital
securities. In addition to increasing Keys Tier I capital, this transaction created additional
liquidity for the parent company.
During the second quarter of 2008, the parent company issued $650 million of noncumulative
perpetual convertible preferred stock and $1.0 billion of additional common stock in light of the
charges recorded in connection with an adverse federal court decision in the AWG Leasing
Litigation. In addition to strengthening the companys capital position, this transaction provided
additional liquidity for the parent company.
Additional sources of liquidity
Management has implemented several programs, as described below, that enable the parent company and
KeyBank to raise funding in the public and private markets when the capital markets are functioning
normally. The proceeds from most of these programs can be used for general corporate purposes,
including acquisitions. Each of the programs is replaced or renewed as needed. There are no
restrictive financial covenants in any of these programs. In addition, certain KeyCorp
subsidiaries maintain credit facilities with the parent company or third parties, which provide
alternative sources of funding in light of current market conditions. KeyCorp is the guarantor of
some of the third-party facilities.
Bank note program. KeyBanks bank note program provides for the issuance of up to $20.0 billion of
notes. These notes may have original maturities from thirty days up to thirty years. KeyBank
issued $555 million of notes under this program during the first six months of 2008. At June 30,
2008, $17.5 billion was available for future issuance.
Euro medium-term note program. Under Keys euro medium-term note program, the parent company and
KeyBank may issue both long- and short-term debt of up to $10.0 billion in the aggregate ($9.0
billion by KeyBank and $1.0 billion by the parent company). The notes are offered exclusively to
non-U.S. investors and can be denominated in U.S. dollars or foreign currencies. Key issued $26
million of notes under this program during the first six months of 2008. At June 30, 2008, $7.3
billion was available for future issuance.
KeyCorp shelf registration, including medium-term note program. In June 2008, the parent company
filed an updated shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission under
revised rules that allow for the registration of various types of debt and equity securities
without limitations on the aggregate amounts available for issuance. Following the closing of the
capital raising transactions in June 2008 and the over allotment option in July 2008, KeyCorps
Board had authority to issue up to $2.8 billion of additional debt and/or equity securities. On
June 20, 2008, the parent company filed an updated prospectus, renewing its medium-term note
program under which the company may issue notes with original maturities of nine months or more.
The parent company issued $750 million of notes under this program during the first six months of
2008 prior to the June filings.
Commercial paper. The parent company has a commercial paper program that provides funding
availability of up to $500 million. As of June 30, 2008, there were no borrowings outstanding
under this program.
KeyBank has a separate commercial paper program at a Canadian subsidiary that provides funding
availability of up to C$1.0 billion in Canadian currency. The borrowings under this program can be
denominated in Canadian or U.S. dollars. As of June 30, 2008, borrowings outstanding under this
commercial paper program totaled C$420 million in Canadian currency and $121 million in U.S.
currency (equivalent to C$124 million in Canadian currency).
80
Keys debt ratings are shown in Figure 30. Management believes that these debt ratings, under
normal conditions in the capital markets, will enable the parent company or KeyBank to effect
future offerings of
securities that would be marketable to investors at a competitive cost. Current conditions in the
capital markets are not normal and for regional banking institutions, such as Key, access to the
capital markets for unsecured term debt continues to be severely restricted, with investors
requiring historically wide spreads over benchmark U.S. Treasury obligations.
Figure 30. Debt Ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enhanced |
|
|
|
|
Senior |
|
Subordinated |
|
|
|
Trust |
|
|
Short-Term |
|
Long-Term |
|
Long-Term |
|
Capital |
|
Preferred |
June 30, 2008 |
|
Borrowings |
|
Debt |
|
Debt |
|
Securities |
|
Securities |
|
KEYCORP (THE PARENT COMPANY) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard & Poors
|
|
A-2
|
|
A-
|
|
BBB+
|
|
BBB
|
|
BBB |
Moodys
|
|
P-1
|
|
A2
|
|
A3
|
|
A3
|
|
A3 |
Fitch
|
|
F1
|
|
A
|
|
A-
|
|
A-
|
|
A- |
DBRS
|
|
R-1 (low)
|
|
A
|
|
A (low)
|
|
N/A
|
|
A (low) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KEYBANK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard & Poors
|
|
A-1
|
|
A
|
|
A-
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
Moodys
|
|
P-1
|
|
A1
|
|
A2
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
Fitch
|
|
F1
|
|
A
|
|
A-
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
DBRS
|
|
R-1 (middle)
|
|
A (high)
|
|
A
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KEY NOVA SCOTIA FUNDING COMPANY (KNSF) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DBRS a
|
|
R-1 (middle)
|
|
A (high)
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Reflects the guarantee by KeyBank of KNSFs issuance of Canadian commercial paper. |
|
N/A = Not Applicable |
Credit risk management
Credit risk is the risk of loss arising from an obligors inability or failure to meet contractual
payment or performance terms. Like other financial services institutions, Key makes loans, extends
credit, purchases securities and enters into financial derivative contracts, all of which expose
Key to credit risk.
Credit policy, approval and evaluation. Key manages credit risk exposure through a multifaceted
program. Independent committees approve both retail and commercial credit policies. These
policies are communicated throughout Key to foster a consistent approach to granting credit. For
more information about Keys credit policies, as well as related approval and evaluation processes,
see the section entitled Credit policy, approval and evaluation on page 51 of Keys 2007 Annual
Report to Shareholders.
Key actively manages the overall loan portfolio in a manner consistent with asset quality
objectives. This process entails the use of credit derivatives ¾ primarily credit default
swaps ¾ to mitigate Keys credit risk. Credit default swaps enable Key to transfer a portion
of the credit risk associated with a particular extension of credit to a third party, and to manage
portfolio concentration and correlation risks. At June 30, 2008, Key used credit default swaps
with a notional amount of $1.3 billion to manage the credit risk associated with specific
commercial lending obligations. Occasionally, Key will provide credit protection to other lenders
through the sale of credit default swaps. These transactions may generate fee income and can
diversify overall exposure to credit loss. At June 30, 2008, the notional amount of credit default
swaps sold by Key was $203 million.
Credit default swaps are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. Related gains or losses, as
well as the premium paid or received for credit protection, are included in the trading income
component of noninterest income. These swaps added $6 million to Keys operating results for the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008.
81
Other actions used to manage the loan portfolio include loan securitizations, portfolio swaps, or
bulk purchases and sales. The overarching goal is to continually manage the loan portfolio within
a specified range of asset quality.
Selected asset quality statistics for Key for each of the past five quarters are presented in
Figure 31. The factors that drive these statistics are discussed in the remainder of this section.
Figure 31. Selected Asset Quality Statistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
dollars in millions |
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Net loan charge-offs |
|
$ |
524 |
|
|
$ |
121 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
Net loan charge-offs to average loans from continuing operations |
|
|
2.75 |
% |
|
|
.67 |
% |
|
|
.67 |
% |
|
|
.35 |
% |
|
|
.32 |
% |
Nonperforming loans at period end |
|
$ |
814 |
|
|
$ |
1,054 |
|
|
$ |
687 |
|
|
$ |
498 |
|
|
$ |
276 |
|
Nonperforming loans to period-end portfolio loans |
|
|
1.07 |
% |
|
|
1.38 |
% |
|
|
.97 |
% |
|
|
.72 |
% |
|
|
.41 |
% |
Nonperforming assets at period end |
|
$ |
1,210 |
|
|
$ |
1,115 |
|
|
$ |
764 |
|
|
$ |
570 |
|
|
$ |
378 |
|
Nonperforming assets to period-end portfolio loans plus
OREO and other nonperforming assets |
|
|
1.59 |
% |
|
|
1.46 |
% |
|
|
1.08 |
% |
|
|
.83 |
% |
|
|
.57 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
1,421 |
|
|
$ |
1,298 |
|
|
$ |
1,200 |
|
|
$ |
955 |
|
|
$ |
945 |
|
Allowance for loan losses to period-end loans |
|
|
1.87 |
% |
|
|
1.70 |
% |
|
|
1.69 |
% |
|
|
1.38 |
% |
|
|
1.42 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans |
|
|
174.57 |
|
|
|
123.15 |
|
|
|
174.67 |
|
|
|
191.77 |
|
|
|
342.39 |
|
|
Watch and criticized assets. Watch assets are troubled commercial loans with the potential to
deteriorate in quality due to the clients current financial condition and possible inability to
perform in accordance with the terms of the underlying contract. Criticized assets are troubled
loans and other assets that show additional signs of weakness that may lead, or have led, to an
interruption in scheduled repayments from primary sources, potentially requiring Key to rely on
repayment from secondary sources, such as collateral liquidation.
At June 30, 2008, the levels of watch assets and criticized assets were higher than they were a
year earlier. Both watch and criticized levels increased in most of the commercial lines of
business. The most significant increase occurred in the Real Estate Capital and Corporate Banking
Services line of business, due principally to deteriorating market conditions in the residential
properties segment of Keys commercial real estate construction portfolio.
Allowance for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2008, was $1.421 billion, or
1.87% of loans, and included the impact of $32 million of allowance added in the January 1, 2008,
acquisition of U.S.B. Holding Co., Inc. and an additional provision for loan losses recorded in
connection with the March 2008 transfer of $3.3 billion of education loans from held-for-sale
status to the loan portfolio. This compares to an allowance of $945 million, or 1.42%, at June 30,
2007. The allowance includes $166 million that was specifically allocated for impaired loans of
$564 million at June 30, 2008, compared to $23 million that was allocated for impaired loans of $53
million one year ago. For more information about impaired loans, see Note 9 (Nonperforming Assets
and Past Due Loans) on page 24. At June 30, 2008, the allowance for loan losses was 174.57% of
nonperforming loans, compared to 342.39% at June 30, 2007.
Management estimates the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses on at least a quarterly
basis. The methodology used is described in Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies)
under the heading Allowance for Loan Losses on page 67 of Keys 2007 Annual Report to
Shareholders. Briefly, management estimates the appropriate level of Keys allowance for loan
losses by applying historical loss rates to existing loans with similar risk characteristics and by
exercising judgment to assess the impact of factors, such as changes in economic conditions,
changes in credit policies or underwriting standards, and changes in the level of credit risk
associated with specific industries and markets. If an impaired loan has
an outstanding balance greater than $2.5 million, management conducts further analysis to determine
the
82
probable loss content, and assigns a specific allowance to the loan if deemed appropriate,
considering the results of the analysis and other relevant factors. A specific allowance also may
be assigned even when sources of repayment appear sufficient if management remains uncertain
about whether the loan will be repaid in full. The allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2008,
represents managements best estimate of the losses inherent in the loan portfolio at that date.
As shown in Figure 32, Keys allowance for loan losses increased by $476 million, or 50%, during
the past twelve months. This increase was attributable primarily to deteriorating conditions in
the commercial real estate portfolio, and in the commercial and financial portfolio within the Real
Estate Capital and Corporate Banking Services line of business. Also contributing to the increase
was the impact of the U.S.B. Holding Co., Inc. acquisition and the March 2008 transfer of education
loans from held-for-sale status to the loan portfolio. During the second quarter of 2008, Key
experienced further deterioration in the credit quality of those education loans associated with
trade schools or non-Title IV institutions. Management expects losses related to these loans to
remain elevated over the remainder of this year, but below the level of losses experienced in the
second quarter.
Figure 32. Allocation of the Allowance for Loan Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance to |
|
|
Loan Type to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance to |
|
|
Loan Type to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance to |
|
|
Loan Type to |
|
dollars in millions |
|
Amount |
|
|
Total Allowance |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Total Allowance |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Total Allowance |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
|
$ |
504 |
|
|
|
35.5 |
% |
|
|
34.2 |
% |
|
$ |
392 |
|
|
|
32.6 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
$ |
357 |
|
|
|
37.8 |
% |
|
|
32.7 |
% |
Real estate commercial mortgage |
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
Real estate construction a |
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
27.2 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
Commercial lease financing |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
Total commercial loans |
|
|
1,149 |
|
|
|
80.9 |
|
|
|
71.4 |
|
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
|
87.4 |
|
|
|
74.4 |
|
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
83.4 |
|
|
|
73.2 |
|
Real estate residential mortgage |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
.3 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
.6 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Home equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Banking |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
National Banking |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
Total home equity loans |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
Consumer other Community Banking |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Consumer other National Banking: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marine |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Education b |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
.4 |
|
|
|
.5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
.4 |
|
|
|
.5 |
|
Other |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
.1 |
|
|
|
.4 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
.7 |
|
|
|
.5 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
.4 |
|
|
Total consumer other National Banking |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
Total consumer loans |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
28.6 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
26.8 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,421 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,200 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
945 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
During the second quarter of 2008, Key transferred $384 million of commercial real estate
loans ($719 million of primarily construction loans, net of $335 million in net charge-offs)
from the loan portfolio to held-for-sale status. |
|
(b) |
|
On March 31, 2008, Key transferred $3.3 billion of education loans from loans held for sale
to the loan portfolio. |
Keys provision for loan losses from continuing operations was $647 million for the second quarter
of 2008, compared to $53 million for the year-ago quarter. The increase in the provision was due
primarily to a higher level of net loan charge-offs recorded in the commercial real estate
portfolio. As previously reported, Key has undertaken a process to reduce its exposure in the
residential properties segment of its construction loan portfolio through the planned sale of
certain loans. In conjunction with these efforts, Key transferred $384 million of commercial real
estate loans ($719 million of primarily construction loans, net of $335 million in net charge-offs)
from the loan portfolio to held-for-sale status in June. As of June 30, 2008, sales had closed on
$44 million of these loans. With respect to the balance, Key is working with
bidders to finalize sales terms and documentation, and management anticipates that sales of the
majority of the remaining $340 million of loans, which are on nonperforming status, will close
during the third quarter. Keys provision for loan losses for the second quarter of 2008 exceeded
its net loan charge-offs by $123 million, as the company continued to build reserves.
Net loan charge-offs. Net loan charge-offs for the second quarter of 2008 were $524 million, or
2.75% of average loans from continuing operations. These results compare to net charge-offs of $53
million, or .32%, for the same period last year. Figure 33 shows the composition of Keys loan
charge-offs and recoveries by type of loan, while the trend in Keys net loan charge-offs by loan
type is presented in Figure 34.
83
As shown
in Figure 34, the largest increases in net charge-offs
compared to the second quarter of 2007 occurred in the commercial, financial and agricultural
portfolio; the residential properties segment of the real estate construction portfolio and the
consumer portfolio. The higher level of net charge-offs in the real estate construction portfolio
reflects the actions taken to sell certain loans. More than half of the increase in net
charge-offs in the consumer portfolio derived from approximately $780 million of education
loans, predominantly loans associated with non-Title IV schools, which the company stopped
underwriting in mid-2006.
Figure 33. Summary of Loan Loss Experience
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six
months ended June 30, |
|
dollars in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Average loans outstanding from continuing operations |
|
$ |
76,652 |
|
|
$ |
66,315 |
|
|
$ |
74,670 |
|
|
$ |
65,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period |
|
$ |
1,298 |
|
|
$ |
944 |
|
|
$ |
1,200 |
|
|
$ |
944 |
|
Loans charged off: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Real estate commercial mortgage |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Total
commercial real estate loans a,b |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Commercial lease financing |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
Total commercial loans |
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Real estate residential mortgage |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Home equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Banking |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
National Banking |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Total home equity loans |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Consumer other Community Banking |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Consumer other National Banking: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marine |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Education |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Other |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Total consumer other National Banking |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
Total consumer loans |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
Real estate commercial mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial real estate loans b |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Commercial lease financing |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
Total commercial loans |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Real estate residential mortgage |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Home equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Banking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
National Banking |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Total home equity loans |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Consumer other Community Banking |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Consumer other National Banking: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marine |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Education |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Other |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Total consumer other National Banking |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
Total consumer loans |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
Net loans charged off |
|
|
(524 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(645 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
Provision for loan losses from continuing operations |
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
834 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
Allowance related to loans acquired, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Allowance for loan losses at end of period |
|
$ |
1,421 |
|
|
$ |
945 |
|
|
$ |
1,421 |
|
|
$ |
945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loan charge-offs to average loans from continuing operations |
|
|
2.75 |
% |
|
|
.32 |
% |
|
|
1.74 |
% |
|
|
.30 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to period-end loans |
|
|
1.87 |
|
|
|
1.42 |
|
|
|
1.87 |
|
|
|
1.42 |
|
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans |
|
|
174.57 |
|
|
|
342.39 |
|
|
|
174.57 |
|
|
|
342.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
During the second quarter of 2008, Key transferred $384 million of commercial real estate
loans ($719 million of primarily construction loans, net of $335 million in net charge-offs)
from the loan portfolio to held-for-sale status. |
|
(b) |
|
See Figure 19 and the accompanying discussion on pages 65 and 66 for more information related
to Keys commercial real estate portfolio. |
84
Figure 34. Net Loan Charge-offs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
dollars in millions |
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
Real estate commercial mortgage |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
339 |
a |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Commercial lease financing |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Total consumer loans |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
Total net loan charge-offs |
|
$ |
524 |
|
|
$ |
121 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loan charge-offs to average loans
from continuing operations |
|
|
2.75 |
% |
|
|
.67 |
% |
|
|
.67 |
% |
|
|
.35 |
% |
|
|
.32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
During the second quarter of 2008, Key transferred $384 million of commercial real estate
loans ($719 million of primarily construction loans, net of $335 million in net charge-offs)
from the loan portfolio to held-for-sale status. |
Management expects Keys quarterly net loan charge-offs to be below the second quarter level during
the remainder of the year; however, net loan charge-offs are expected to remain at elevated levels.
Additionally, management expects net loan charge-offs to be in the range of 1.20% to 1.60% of
average loans for the second half of 2008.
Nonperforming assets. Figure 35 shows the composition of Keys nonperforming assets. These assets
totaled $1.210 billion at June 30, 2008, and represented 1.59% of portfolio loans, other real
estate owned and other nonperforming assets, compared to $764 million, or 1.08%, at December 31,
2007, and $378 million, or .57%, at June 30, 2007.
As shown in Figure 35, the growth in nonperforming assets over the past twelve months was
attributable to a higher level of nonperforming loans caused largely by deteriorating market
conditions in the residential properties segment of Keys commercial real estate construction
portfolio. The majority of the increase in this segment relates to loans outstanding in Florida
and southern California. Also contributing to the rise in nonperforming assets was an increase in
the level of commercial loans (principally to businesses tied to residential construction) on nonaccrual status.
The decrease in nonperforming loans and the increase in nonperforming assets during the second
quarter of 2008 were due primarily to the transfer of commercial real estate construction loans to held-for-sale status.
At June 30, 2008, Keys 20 largest nonperforming loans totaled $372 million, representing 46% of
total loans on nonperforming status. The level of Keys delinquent loans rose over the past twelve
months, reflecting the deterioration in the housing market.
85
Figure 35. Summary of Nonperforming Assets and Past Due Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
dollars in millions |
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
|
$ |
259 |
|
|
$ |
147 |
|
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate commercial mortgage |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
Total commercial real estate loans a |
|
|
363 |
b |
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Commercial lease financing |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
Total commercial loans |
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
908 |
|
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
Real estate residential mortgage |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Home equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Banking |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
National Banking |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
Total home equity loans |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
Consumer other Community Banking |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Consumer other National Banking: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marine |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Education |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Total consumer other National Banking |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
Total consumer loans |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
Total nonperforming loans |
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans held for sale |
|
|
342 |
b |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
OREO |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Allowance for OREO losses |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
OREO, net of allowance |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other nonperforming assets c |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
Total nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
1,210 |
|
|
$ |
1,115 |
|
|
$ |
764 |
|
|
$ |
570 |
|
|
$ |
378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more |
|
$ |
367 |
|
|
$ |
283 |
|
|
$ |
231 |
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
$ |
181 |
|
Accruing loans past due 30 through 89 days |
|
|
852 |
|
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
Nonperforming loans to period-end portfolio loans |
|
|
1.07 |
% |
|
|
1.38 |
% |
|
|
.97 |
% |
|
|
.72 |
% |
|
|
.41 |
% |
Nonperforming assets to period-end portfolio loans
plus OREO and other nonperforming assets |
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
|
1.46 |
|
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
|
.83 |
|
|
|
.57 |
|
|
(a) |
|
See Figure 19 and the accompanying discussion on pages 65 and 66 for more information related
to Keys commercial real estate portfolio. |
|
(b) |
|
During the second quarter of 2008, Key transferred $384 million of commercial real estate
loans ($719 million of primarily construction loans, net of $335 million in net charge-offs)
from the loan portfolio to held-for-sale status. |
|
(c) |
|
Primarily investments held by the Private Equity unit within Keys Real Estate Capital and
Corporate Banking Services line of business. |
Figure 36 shows credit exposure by industry classification in the largest sector of Keys loan
portfolio, commercial, financial and agricultural loans. The types of activity that caused the
change in Keys nonperforming loans during each of the last five quarters are summarized in Figure
37.
86
Figure 36. Commercial, Financial and Agricultural Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming Loans |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
Total |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Loans |
|
dollars in millions |
|
Commitments a |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Industry classification: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
$ |
11,404 |
|
|
$ |
4,032 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
|
.2 |
% |
Manufacturing |
|
|
10,210 |
|
|
|
4,099 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Retail trade |
|
|
6,891 |
|
|
|
3,896 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
.1 |
|
Public utilities |
|
|
4,791 |
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
.1 |
|
Financial services |
|
|
4,497 |
|
|
|
1,428 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
.1 |
|
Wholesale trade |
|
|
3,811 |
|
|
|
1,793 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
.4 |
|
Property management |
|
|
3,256 |
|
|
|
1,731 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Insurance |
|
|
2,465 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Building contractors |
|
|
2,235 |
|
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
Transportation |
|
|
1,971 |
|
|
|
1,473 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Public administration |
|
|
1,066 |
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mining |
|
|
1,034 |
|
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agriculture/forestry/fishing |
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
.2 |
|
Communications |
|
|
826 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Individuals |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
3,769 |
|
|
|
3,241 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
59,139 |
|
|
$ |
25,929 |
|
|
$ |
259 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Total commitments include unfunded loan commitments, unfunded letters of credit (net of
amounts conveyed to others) and loans outstanding. |
Figure 37. Summary of Changes in Nonperforming Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
in millions |
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
1,054 |
|
|
$ |
687 |
|
|
$ |
498 |
|
|
$ |
276 |
|
|
$ |
254 |
|
Loans placed on nonaccrual status |
|
|
789 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(547 |
) |
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
Loans sold |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Payments |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
Transfers to OREO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Transfer to nonperforming loans
held-for-sale |
|
|
(342 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans returned to accrual status |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
814 |
|
|
$ |
1,054 |
|
|
$ |
687 |
|
|
$ |
498 |
|
|
$ |
276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational risk management
Key, like all businesses, is subject to operational risk, which is the risk of loss resulting from
human error, inadequate or failed internal processes and systems, and external events. Operational
risk also encompasses compliance (legal) risk, which is the risk of loss from violations of, or
noncompliance with, laws, rules, regulations, prescribed practices or ethical standards. Resulting
losses could take the form of explicit charges, increased operational costs, harm to Keys
reputation or forgone opportunities. Key seeks to mitigate operational risk through a system of
internal controls.
Management continuously strives to strengthen Keys system of internal controls to ensure
compliance with laws, rules and regulations, and to improve the oversight of Keys operational
risk. For example, a loss-event database is used to track the amounts and sources of operational
losses. This tracking mechanism helps to identify weaknesses and to highlight the need to take
corrective action. Management also relies upon sophisticated software programs designed to assist
in monitoring Keys control processes. This technology has enhanced the reporting of the
effectiveness of Keys controls to senior management and the Board of Directors.
87
Primary responsibility for managing and monitoring internal control mechanisms lies with the
managers of Keys various lines of business. Keys Risk Review function periodically assesses the
overall effectiveness of Keys system of internal controls. Risk Review reports the results of
reviews on internal controls and systems to senior management and the Audit Committee, and
independently supports the Audit Committees oversight of these controls. A senior management
committee, known as the Operational Risk Committee, oversees Keys level of operational risk, and
directs and supports Keys operational infrastructure and related activities.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
The information presented in the Market Risk Management section, which begins on page 75 of the
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, is
incorporated herein by reference.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, KeyCorp carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of KeyCorps management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of KeyCorps
disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, KeyCorps Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls
and procedures were effective, in all material respects, as of the end of the period covered by
this report. No changes were made to KeyCorps internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during the last fiscal quarter
that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, KeyCorps internal control
over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The information presented in the Legal Proceedings section of Note 13 (Contingent Liabilities and
Guarantees), which begins on page 29 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, and in the
Lease Financing Transactions section of Note 12 (Income Taxes), which begins on page 27 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The discussion related to Keys common share repurchase activities in the section entitled
Capital, which begins on page 72 of the Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
At the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of KeyCorp held on May 15, 2008, the shareholders
elected four directors to serve for three-year terms expiring in 2011, amended the Code of
Regulations to require the annual election of all directors, and ratified the appointment by the
Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors of KeyCorp
for the year ending December 31, 2008. Director nominees for terms expiring in 2011 were: Edward
P. Campbell, H. James Dallas, Lauralee E. Martin and Bill R. Sanford. Directors whose terms in
office as directors continued after the Annual Meeting of Shareholders were: Ralph Alvarez,
William G. Bares, Carol A. Cartwright, Alexander M. Cutler, Eduardo R. Menascé, Henry L. Meyer III,
Thomas C. Stevens and Peter G. Ten Eyck, II.
88
The vote on each issue was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
Election of Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edward P. Campbell |
|
|
335,623,289 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
13,398,584 |
|
H. James Dallas |
|
|
336,143,129 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
12,878,744 |
|
Lauralee E. Martin |
|
|
336,064,327 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
12,957,546 |
|
Bill R. Sanford |
|
|
336,023,886 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
12,997,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment to the Code of
Regulations to require the
annual election of all
Directors |
|
|
338,542,761 |
|
|
|
4,258,055 |
|
|
|
6,221,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratification of the Appointment
of Ernst & Young LLP as
Independent Auditors of KeyCorp
for Fiscal Year 2008. |
|
|
340,860,515 |
|
|
|
3,714,800 |
|
|
|
4,446,558 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Proxies provide that shareholders may either cast a vote for, or abstain from voting for,
directors. |
Item 5. Other Information
Thomas W. Bunns Retirement
As KeyCorp previously reported on Form 8-K filed on July 10, 2008, Thomas W. Bunn, Vice Chair for
KeyCorps National Banking group and Senior Executive Vice President of KeyBank National
Association, has announced his intention to retire from KeyCorp (the Company). Pursuant to a
letter agreement executed on August 6, 2008 (the Letter Agreement), Mr. Bunn has agreed to
continue to serve in his present capacity through November 30, 2008, at his current base salary.
For his continued services, the Company has agreed to provide a retention bonus of $1,450,000 to
Mr. Bunn payable on December 15, 2008. Mr. Bunn has also agreed to provide transition services to
the Company through February 28, 2009. During this period, Mr. Bunn will be paid one-half of his
normal salary for such services, as well as a single lump sum cash bonus of $767,400 payable at the
conclusion of this period.
In addition, Mr. Bunn has agreed to not engage in any Competitive Activity (as defined in the
Letter Agreement), to solicit any KeyCorp customer, or hire any KeyCorp employee on his own behalf
or on behalf of anyone else following his retirement and for an agreed-upon period. Under the
Letter Agreement, restricted stock and cash performance awards given to Mr. Bunn will continue to
vest or forfeit according to the terms of the plans under which they were issued. Mr. Bunn will
also retain the ability to exercise vested stock options for three years from his retirement date
in conformity with plan provisions. As of February 28, 2009, Mr. Bunn will forfeit all right,
title and interest in his Change of Control Agreement dated December 17, 2007.
The Letter Agreement is attached as Exhibit 10 to this Form 10-Q and incorporated herein by
reference.
89
Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008
On July 30, 2008, the President signed into law the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008.
This Act is intended to respond to the mortgage crisis that has impaired the U.S. economy over the
past year by mandating a number of reforms. Among its many provisions, the Act:
|
|
|
¨
|
|
provides mortgage refinancing assistance and expands Federal Housing Administrations guarantees of mortgages and
funding for financial counseling for borrowers; |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
strengthens the regulation of the Federal National Mortgage Association and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (the
GSEs) by establishing a new regulator with enhanced authority; |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
raises the GSE loan limits for mortgages on single family homes; |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
creates an affordable housing trust fund financed by the GSEs to fund the construction, maintenance and preservation of
affordable rental housing for low-income individuals and families; |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
requires the Federal Reserve and Treasury to consult with the new GSE regulator on issues concerning the safety and
soundness of the GSEs; |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
provides $4 billion in emergency assistance to communities hardest hit by the foreclosure and subprime crisis to
purchase or rehabilitate homes in order to stabilize neighborhoods; |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
establishes a nationwide loan originator licensing and registration system to set minimum licensing standards to
improve the oversight of mortgage brokers and bank loan officers, and requires enhanced loan disclosure documents; |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
increases lending opportunities in high-cost housing areas for veterans and those with disabilities; |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
provides tax credits and other benefits to spur home buying and improve access to low-income housing; and |
|
|
|
¨
|
|
increases the U.S. debt limit by $800 billion to $10.6 trillion. |
Item 6. Exhibits
3.1 |
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of KeyCorp. |
|
3.2 |
|
Amended and Restated Code of Regulations of KeyCorp. |
|
10 |
|
Letter Agreement for Mr. Thomas W. Bunn. |
|
15 |
|
Acknowledgment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
Information Available on Website
KeyCorp makes available free of charge on its website, www.key.com, its annual report on Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports as soon
as reasonably practicable after KeyCorp electronically files such material with, or furnishes it
to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.
90
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
KEYCORP
|
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: August 8, 2008 |
/s/ Robert L. Morris
|
|
|
By: Robert L. Morris |
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer |
|
|
91