Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-16132
CELGENE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
22-2711928 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation
or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification
Number) |
|
|
|
86 Morris Avenue, Summit, NJ
|
|
07901 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(
908) 673-9000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (check one):
Large accelerated þ Accelerated o Non-accelerated o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
At October 30, 2007, 385,860,205 shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, were
outstanding.
CELGENE CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART 1 FINANCIAL INFORMATION
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
Nine-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net product sales |
|
$ |
331,169 |
|
|
$ |
223,105 |
|
|
$ |
919,910 |
|
|
$ |
559,749 |
|
Collaborative agreements and other revenue |
|
|
4,616 |
|
|
|
4,632 |
|
|
|
14,520 |
|
|
|
12,848 |
|
Royalty revenue |
|
|
14,123 |
|
|
|
17,102 |
|
|
|
56,800 |
|
|
|
51,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
349,908 |
|
|
|
244,839 |
|
|
|
991,230 |
|
|
|
623,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
34,079 |
|
|
|
34,205 |
|
|
|
84,835 |
|
|
|
91,148 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
130,545 |
|
|
|
66,756 |
|
|
|
300,054 |
|
|
|
178,298 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
97,309 |
|
|
|
89,592 |
|
|
|
318,716 |
|
|
|
239,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
261,933 |
|
|
|
190,553 |
|
|
|
703,605 |
|
|
|
508,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
87,975 |
|
|
|
54,286 |
|
|
|
287,625 |
|
|
|
114,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income and expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and investment income, net |
|
|
28,296 |
|
|
|
9,253 |
|
|
|
79,447 |
|
|
|
22,102 |
|
Equity in losses of affiliated companies |
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
3,338 |
|
|
|
5,202 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
2,614 |
|
|
|
2,361 |
|
|
|
7,913 |
|
|
|
7,086 |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
1,134 |
|
|
|
(3,345 |
) |
|
|
4,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
113,283 |
|
|
|
61,576 |
|
|
|
352,476 |
|
|
|
128,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
74,450 |
|
|
|
41,139 |
|
|
|
201,364 |
|
|
|
82,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
38,833 |
|
|
$ |
20,437 |
|
|
$ |
151,112 |
|
|
$ |
46,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
383,774 |
|
|
|
351,200 |
|
|
|
380,841 |
|
|
|
347,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
432,817 |
|
|
|
404,858 |
|
|
|
431,208 |
|
|
|
403,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
3
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,040,735 |
|
|
$ |
1,439,415 |
|
Marketable securities available for sale |
|
|
1,488,970 |
|
|
|
542,805 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $5,511 and $6,625 at September 30, 2007
and December 31, 2006, respectively |
|
|
146,416 |
|
|
|
127,777 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
56,198 |
|
|
|
25,371 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
65,731 |
|
|
|
87,979 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
97,885 |
|
|
|
87,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
2,895,935 |
|
|
|
2,311,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
175,589 |
|
|
|
146,645 |
|
Investment in affiliated companies |
|
|
15,089 |
|
|
|
16,379 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
97,469 |
|
|
|
100,509 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
40,098 |
|
|
|
38,494 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
149,005 |
|
|
|
122,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,373,185 |
|
|
$ |
2,735,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
24,691 |
|
|
$ |
24,410 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
154,393 |
|
|
|
112,992 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
84,859 |
|
Convertible notes |
|
|
399,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of deferred revenue |
|
|
7,792 |
|
|
|
7,647 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
25,794 |
|
|
|
9,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
613,294 |
|
|
|
239,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
399,889 |
|
Deferred revenue, net of current portion |
|
|
62,583 |
|
|
|
63,027 |
|
Non-current income taxes payable |
|
|
158,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
59,811 |
|
|
|
56,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
893,859 |
|
|
|
759,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value per share, 5,000,000 shares
authorized; none outstanding at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value per share, 575,000,000 shares authorized; issued
389,778,741 and 380,092,309 shares at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively |
|
|
3,898 |
|
|
|
3,801 |
|
Common stock in treasury, at cost; 4,026,116 and 4,057,553 shares at September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, respectively |
|
|
(149,519 |
) |
|
|
(148,097 |
) |
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
2,519,085 |
|
|
|
2,209,889 |
|
Retained earnings (deficit) |
|
|
49,339 |
|
|
|
(101,773 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
56,523 |
|
|
|
12,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,479,326 |
|
|
|
1,976,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
3,373,185 |
|
|
$ |
2,735,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
4
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
151,112 |
|
|
$ |
46,069 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of long-term assets |
|
|
22,502 |
|
|
|
18,647 |
|
Provision for accounts receivable allowances |
|
|
6,353 |
|
|
|
2,086 |
|
Realized loss on marketable securities available for sale |
|
|
4,085 |
|
|
|
3,992 |
|
Unrealized loss on value of EntreMed warrants |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
Equity in losses of affiliated companies |
|
|
2,910 |
|
|
|
4,865 |
|
Non-cash share-based compensation expense |
|
|
41,630 |
|
|
|
58,802 |
|
Amortization of discount on marketable securities available for sale, net |
|
|
(2,575 |
) |
|
|
(2,374 |
) |
Amortization of debt issuance cost |
|
|
1,832 |
|
|
|
1,832 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(4,334 |
) |
|
|
(23,350 |
) |
Shares issued for employee benefit plans |
|
|
6,436 |
|
|
|
6,518 |
|
Other |
|
|
(1,946 |
) |
|
|
(2,642 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in current assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in accounts receivable |
|
|
(23,148 |
) |
|
|
(37,857 |
) |
Increase in inventory |
|
|
(34,480 |
) |
|
|
(13,650 |
) |
Increase in other operating assets |
|
|
(11,088 |
) |
|
|
(45,439 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
61,162 |
|
|
|
(28,993 |
) |
Increase in income tax payable |
|
|
93,085 |
|
|
|
56,178 |
|
Decrease in deferred revenue |
|
|
(2,733 |
) |
|
|
(2,154 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
310,933 |
|
|
|
42,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(38,447 |
) |
|
|
(31,919 |
) |
Proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities available for sale |
|
|
1,462,836 |
|
|
|
563,548 |
|
Purchases of marketable securities available for sale |
|
|
(2,362,302 |
) |
|
|
(581,060 |
) |
Investment in affiliated companies |
|
|
(1,621 |
) |
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
Purchases of long-term investments |
|
|
(23,356 |
) |
|
|
(625 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(962,890 |
) |
|
|
(52,056 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from exercise of common stock options and warrants |
|
|
136,033 |
|
|
|
67,982 |
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation arrangements |
|
|
112,614 |
|
|
|
57,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
248,647 |
|
|
|
125,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of currency rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
4,630 |
|
|
|
3,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(398,680 |
) |
|
|
120,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
1,439,415 |
|
|
|
123,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
1,040,735 |
|
|
$ |
243,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
5
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net unrealized loss on marketable
securities available for sale |
|
$ |
43,988 |
|
|
$ |
7,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matured shares tendered in connection with stock option exercises |
|
$ |
(6,457 |
) |
|
$ |
(85,876 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of convertible notes |
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
5,250 |
|
|
$ |
5,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
24,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
6
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED)
1. Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Business and Basis of Presentation: Celgene Corporation and its subsidiaries
(collectively Celgene or the Company) is a global biopharmaceutical company primarily engaged
in the discovery, development and commercialization of innovative therapies designed to treat
cancer and immune-inflammatory diseases through regulation of cellular, genomic and proteomic
targets. The Companys commercial stage programs include pharmaceutical sales of
REVLIMID®, THALOMID®, ALKERAN® and sales of FOCALINTM
to Novartis Pharma AG, or Novartis; a licensing agreement with Novartis which entitles the Company
to royalties on FOCALIN XRTM and the entire RITALIN® family of drugs; a
licensing and product supply agreement with Pharmion Corporation for its sales of thalidomide in
licensed territories; and sales of tissue and cellular products and services through its Cellular
Therapeutics subsidiary.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared from the books and
records of the Company pursuant to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim
information and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for reporting
on Form 10-Q. Pursuant to such rules and regulations, certain information and footnote disclosures
normally included in complete annual financial statements have been condensed or omitted. The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Celgene Corporation and its subsidiaries.
All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated. Investments in limited
partnerships and interests in which the Company has an equity interest of 50% or less and does not
otherwise have a controlling financial interest are accounted for by either the equity or cost
method. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior periods consolidated financial
statements in order to conform to the current periods presentation. The interim consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2006.
Interim results may not be indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. In the
opinion of management, these financial statements include all normal and recurring adjustments
considered necessary for a fair presentation of these interim consolidated financial statements.
Recent Accounting Principles: In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, Accounting for
Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140, or SFAS
155, which permits a fair value re-measurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an
embedded derivative that would otherwise require bifurcation. The Company has adopted the
provisions of SFAS 155 effective January 1, 2007 and has determined that it had no impact on its
consolidated financial statements.
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued FASB Interpretation
No. 48, or FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxesan interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an
enterprises financial statements in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 109, or SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, and prescribes a recognition threshold and
measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position
taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 effective January 1, 2007 and had no cumulative effect
adjustment related to the adoption. See Note 10, Income Taxes, for additional information.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, or SFAS 157, which
establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. Where applicable, SFAS 157 simplifies and codifies related guidance within generally
accepted accounting principles. SFAS 157 will be effective for the Company beginning January 1,
2008. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS 157, if any, will have on its consolidated
financial statements.
7
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED)
In December 2006, the FASB issued FSP EITF Issue No. 00-19-2, Accounting for Registration Payment
Arrangements, or FSP 00-19-2, which addresses an issuers accounting for registration payment
arrangements. FSP 00-19-2 specifies that the contingent obligation to make future payments or
otherwise transfer consideration under a registration payment arrangement, whether issued as a
separate agreement or included as a provision of a financial instrument or other agreement, should
be separately recognized and measured in accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies. FSP 00-19-2 was issued in December 2006 and was effective immediately for
registration payment arrangements and the financial instruments subject to those arrangements that
were entered into or modified subsequent to the issuance of FSP 00-19-2. For registration payment
arrangements and financial instruments subject to those arrangements that were entered into prior
to the issuance of FSP 00-19-2, it is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company has adopted the provisions of FSP 00-19-2 effective
January 1, 2007 and has determined that the adoption had no impact on its consolidated financial
statements. See Note 7, Convertible Debt, for additional information.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities, or SFAS 159, which provides companies with an option to report selected
financial assets and liabilities at fair value. SFAS 159s objective is to improve financial
reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings
caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex
hedge accounting provisions. This Statement is expected to expand the use of fair value
measurement, which is consistent with the Boards long-term measurement objectives for accounting
for financial instruments. SFAS 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements
designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes
for similar types of assets and liabilities and the highlight the effect of a companys choice to
use fair value on its earnings. It also requires a company to display the fair value of those
assets and liabilities for which it has chosen to use fair value on the face of the balance sheet.
SFAS 159 will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2008. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS 159, if any, will have on its consolidated financial
statements.
On May 2, 2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FIN 48-1, or FSP FIN 48-1, Definition of
Settlement in FASB Interpretation No. 48. FSP FIN 48-1 provides guidance on how an enterprise
should determine whether a tax position is effectively settled for the purpose of recognizing
previously unrecognized tax benefits. The Company retroactively adopted the provisions of FSP FIN
48-1 effective January 1, 2007 and has determined that it had no impact on its consolidated
financial statements.
In June 2007, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force, or EITF, Issue No. 07-3, Accounting
for Non-Refundable Advance Payments for Goods or Services to Be Used in Future Research and
Development Activities, or EITF 07-3, which provides that non-refundable advance payments for
future research and development activities should be deferred and capitalized until the related
goods are delivered or the related services are performed. EITF 07-3 will be effective for the
Company on a prospective basis beginning January 1, 2008.
8
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED)
2. Earnings Per Share (EPS)
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of
common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net
income adjusted to add back the after-tax amount of interest recognized in the period associated
with any convertible debt issuance that may be dilutive by the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding during the period increased to include all additional common shares that would
have been outstanding as if the outstanding convertible debt was converted into shares of common
stock and assuming potentially dilutive common shares resulting from
option exercises had been issued and any proceeds thereof used
to repurchase common stock at the average market price during the period. The proceeds used to
repurchase common stock are assumed to be the sum of the amount to be paid to the Company upon
exercise of options, the amount of compensation cost attributed to future services and not yet
recognized and, if applicable, the amount of excess income tax benefit that would be credited to
paid-in capital upon exercise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
Nine-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
38,833 |
|
|
$ |
20,437 |
|
|
$ |
151,112 |
|
|
$ |
46,069 |
|
Interest expense on convertible debt, net of tax |
|
|
1,392 |
|
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
|
4,177 |
|
|
|
4,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for diluted computation |
|
$ |
40,225 |
|
|
$ |
21,830 |
|
|
$ |
155,289 |
|
|
$ |
50,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
383,774 |
|
|
|
351,200 |
|
|
|
380,841 |
|
|
|
347,687 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options, warrants and other incentives |
|
|
16,042 |
|
|
|
20,637 |
|
|
|
17,366 |
|
|
|
22,384 |
|
Convertible debt |
|
|
33,001 |
|
|
|
33,021 |
|
|
|
33,001 |
|
|
|
33,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
432,817 |
|
|
|
404,858 |
|
|
|
431,208 |
|
|
|
403,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total number of potential common shares excluded from the diluted earnings per share
computation because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive was 4,855,003 and 1,872,512
shares for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The total
number of potential common shares excluded from the diluted earnings per share computation for the
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 was 5,464,407 and 2,893,814 shares,
respectively.
9
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED)
3. Comprehensive Income
The components of comprehensive income, representing the change in equity from non-owner sources,
consists of net income, changes in currency translation adjustments and the after-tax effects of
changes in net unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities classified as available for sale.
A summary of comprehensive income for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007
and 2006 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
Nine-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
38,833 |
|
|
$ |
20,437 |
|
|
$ |
151,112 |
|
|
$ |
46,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on marketable securities
available for sale, net of tax |
|
|
24,981 |
|
|
|
7,936 |
|
|
|
24,278 |
|
|
|
1,597 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for losses
included in net income |
|
|
2,639 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
4,085 |
|
|
|
3,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrealized gains on marketable securities
available for sale, net of tax |
|
|
27,620 |
|
|
|
8,255 |
|
|
|
28,363 |
|
|
|
5,583 |
|
Currency translation adjustments |
|
|
9,908 |
|
|
|
4,710 |
|
|
|
15,803 |
|
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income |
|
|
37,528 |
|
|
|
12,965 |
|
|
|
44,166 |
|
|
|
5,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
76,361 |
|
|
$ |
33,402 |
|
|
$ |
195,278 |
|
|
$ |
51,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED)
4. Cash, Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities Available-for-Sale
Money market funds of $1.014 billion and $1.401 billion at September 30, 2007 and December 31,
2006, respectively, were recorded at cost, which approximates fair value and are included in cash
and cash equivalents.
The amortized cost, gross unrealized holding gains, gross unrealized holding losses and estimated
fair value of available-for-sale securities by major security type and class of security at
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gain |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed obligations |
|
$ |
205,251 |
|
|
$ |
858 |
|
|
$ |
(327 |
) |
|
$ |
205,782 |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
155,851 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
156,336 |
|
U.S. government-sponsored agency securities |
|
|
1,018,927 |
|
|
|
6,195 |
|
|
|
(941 |
) |
|
|
1,024,181 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
13,462 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(848 |
) |
|
|
12,632 |
|
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
546 |
|
Marketable equity securities |
|
|
20,212 |
|
|
|
69,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale marketable securities |
|
$ |
1,414,249 |
|
|
$ |
76,892 |
|
|
$ |
(2,171 |
) |
|
$ |
1,488,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gain |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed obligations |
|
$ |
62,137 |
|
|
$ |
281 |
|
|
$ |
(426 |
) |
|
$ |
61,992 |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
53,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(497 |
) |
|
|
52,763 |
|
U.S. government-sponsored agency securities |
|
|
349,756 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
(3,771 |
) |
|
|
346,055 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
13,477 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(470 |
) |
|
|
13,024 |
|
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
17,315 |
|
|
|
1,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,046 |
|
Marketable equity securities |
|
|
20,212 |
|
|
|
29,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale marketable securities |
|
$ |
516,157 |
|
|
$ |
31,812 |
|
|
$ |
(5,164 |
) |
|
$ |
542,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed obligations include fixed rate asset-backed securities issued by the Federal
National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Bank, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation and the Government National Mortgage Association. U.S. government-sponsored agency
securities include general unsecured obligations of the issuing agency. Other asset-backed
securities are securities backed by collateral other than mortgage obligations. Unrealized losses
for mortgage-backed obligations, U.S. Treasury securities and U.S. government-sponsored agency
securities were primarily due to increases in interest rates. Unrealized losses for corporate debt
were due to increases in interest rates as well as widening credit spreads. The Company has
sufficient liquidity and intends to hold these securities with unrealized losses until the market
value recovers. Moreover, the Company believes it is probable that it will collect all amounts due
according to the contractual terms of the individual investments.
During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, the Company determined that certain of
its other asset-backed securities had sustained an other-than-temporary impairment due to a
reduction in their future estimated cash flows and, as a result, the Company recognized an
impairment loss of $3.0 million, of which $0.6 million related to a security which was
subsequently sold. Impairment losses are recorded in interest and investment income, net.
11
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED)
Duration of debt securities classified as available-for-sale at September 30, 2007 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duration of one year or less |
|
$ |
385,673 |
|
|
$ |
386,531 |
|
Duration of one through three years |
|
|
869,601 |
|
|
|
873,382 |
|
Duration of three through five years |
|
|
118,691 |
|
|
|
119,046 |
|
Duration of five years or more |
|
|
20,072 |
|
|
|
20,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,394,037 |
|
|
$ |
1,399,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Inventory
A summary of inventories by major category at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
11,834 |
|
|
$ |
10,133 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
18,941 |
|
|
|
4,715 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
25,423 |
|
|
|
10,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
56,198 |
|
|
$ |
25,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED)
6. Investment in Affiliated Companies
A summary of the Companys equity investment in affiliated companies follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in EntreMed Inc. equity |
|
$ |
232 |
|
|
$ |
2,609 |
|
Excess of investment over share of EntreMed Inc. equity (1) |
|
|
12,464 |
|
|
|
12,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in EntreMed Inc. |
|
$ |
12,696 |
|
|
$ |
15,299 |
|
Investment in Burrill Life Sciences, LLP |
|
|
2,393 |
|
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in affiliated companies |
|
$ |
15,089 |
|
|
$ |
16,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
Nine-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
Equity in Losses of Affiliated Companies |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Celgenes share of affiliated companies losses (2)(3) |
|
$ |
1,031 |
|
|
$ |
661 |
|
|
$ |
3,112 |
|
|
$ |
4,976 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in losses of affiliated companies |
|
$ |
1,106 |
|
|
$ |
736 |
|
|
$ |
3,338 |
|
|
$ |
5,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consists of intangible assets and goodwill of $75 and $12,389, respectively, at September 30, 2007 and $301 and $12,389, respectively, at
December 31, 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
The Company records its interest and share of losses in EntreMed Inc. based on its common stock ownership, which was 12.31% and 10.73% at
September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
The nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 includes $3.1 million related to the Companys share of EntreMeds in-process research and
development write-down related to its acquisition of Miikana Therapeutics Inc. on January 10, 2006. |
The fair value of the Companys common stock investment in EntreMed Inc. at September 30, 2007
was $11.1 million, or $1.6 million below its carrying value. The Company believes that this
unfavorable position is temporary and no impairment loss was recognized.
7. Convertible Debt
Convertible Notes: In June 2003, the Company issued an aggregate principal amount of $400.0
million of unsecured convertible notes due June 2008. The notes have a five-year term and a coupon
rate of 1.75% payable semi-annually on June 1 and December 1. Each $1,000 principal amount of
convertible notes is convertible into 82.5592 shares of common stock as adjusted, or a conversion
price of $12.1125 per share, which represented a 50% premium to the closing price on May 28, 2003
of the Companys common stock of $8.075 per share, after adjusting prices for the two-for-one stock
splits affected on February 17, 2006 and October 22, 2004. The debt issuance costs related to these
convertible notes, which totaled approximately $12.2 million, are classified under other assets on
the consolidated balance sheet and are being amortized over five years, assuming no conversion.
Under the terms of the purchase agreement, the noteholders at September 30, 2007 can convert the
outstanding notes at any time into 33,001,483 shares of common stock at the conversion price. In
addition, the noteholders have the right to require the Company to redeem the notes in cash at a
price equal to 100% of the principal amount to be redeemed, plus accrued interest, prior to
maturity in the event of a change of control and certain other transactions defined as a
fundamental change in the indenture governing the notes. Subsequent to the September 2003
issuance date, an immaterial amount of principal has been converted into common stock.
13
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED)
In June 2007, the Companys convertible notes were reclassified from long-term convertible notes to
current convertible notes, due to their maturity in June 2008. Based on the price of our common
stock at September 30, 2007, the Company expects noteholders to convert the notes into shares of
common stock and does not expect such conversion to have a material impact on its financial
condition, liquidity or capital resources.
At September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the fair value of the Companys convertible notes
outstanding exceeded the carrying value by approximately $1.954 billion and $1.507 billion,
respectively.
Under the Registration Rights Agreement for the notes, or the Registration Rights Agreement, the
Company could be subject to liquidated damages if the effectiveness of the registration statement
covering the convertible debt is not maintained at any time prior to the earlier of: (i) two years
after the conversion of the last convertible note into common stock or (ii) September 2010. The
Company believes the likelihood of occurrence of such event is remote and, as such, the Company has
not recorded a liability for liquidated damages at September 30, 2007. In the unlikely event that
it becomes probable that the Company would have to pay liquidated damages under the Registration
Rights Agreement, the Company has estimated the maximum potential liquidated damages as of
September 30, 2007 to be approximately $2.0 million per year. Such damages (a) would accrue only
with respect to the shares of the Companys common stock (underlying the notes) that were not
already sold by the holder (under the registration statement or pursuant to Rule 144 promulgated
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended) and that were not eligible for sale without a
registration statement, (b) would accrue only for the period during which the registration
statement was not effective, subsequent to its initial effectiveness and (c) would be settled in
cash in accordance with the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement.
8. Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Intangible Assets: A summary of intangible assets by category follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Assets, |
|
|
Average |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
Value |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Life (Years) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Penn T supply agreements |
|
$ |
112,980 |
|
|
$ |
(19,743 |
) |
|
$ |
93,237 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
License |
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
|
(538 |
) |
|
|
3,712 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
Technology |
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
Acquired workforce |
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
117,831 |
|
|
$ |
(20,362 |
) |
|
$ |
97,469 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Assets, |
|
|
Average |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
Value |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Life (Years) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Penn T supply agreements |
|
$ |
108,462 |
|
|
$ |
(12,296 |
) |
|
$ |
96,166 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
License |
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
3,943 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
Technology |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
Acquired workforce |
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
113,129 |
|
|
$ |
(12,620 |
) |
|
$ |
100,509 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $4.7 million increase in gross carrying value of intangible assets from December 31, 2006
to September 30, 2007 was principally due to the impact of foreign currency translation.
Amortization of acquired intangible assets was approximately $2.4 million and $2.3 million for the
three-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $7.1 million and $6.7
million for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Assuming no
changes in the gross carrying amount of intangible assets, the amortization of intangible assets
for the next five fiscal years is estimated to be approximately $9.6 million per year.
14
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED)
Goodwill: At September 30, 2007, the Companys goodwill related to the October 21, 2004
acquisition of Penn T Limited. The change in carrying value of goodwill is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
38,494 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
1,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
40,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
9. Share-Based Compensation
Effective June 12, 2007, the Company amended the 1995 Non-Employee Directors Incentive Plan to
increase the number of options to purchase common stock granted to each new Non-Employee Director,
from 20,000 to 25,000 and to increase the quarterly grants of options from 3,750 (15,000 annually)
to 4,625 (18,500 annually). Effective August 22, 2007, the Company amended the 1998 Stock Incentive
Plan (the 1998 Plan) to provide for continued vesting of stock options and stock appreciation
rights, granted on or after September 1, 2007, during the three-year period following a
participants retirement (as defined in the 1998 Plan), provided that the Compensation Committee
under the 1998 Plan or its designee receives not less than six months written notice of the
participants intent to retire.
The following table summarizes the components of share-based compensation expense in the
consolidated statements of operations for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30,
2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
Nine-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of good sold |
|
$ |
582 |
|
|
$ |
413 |
|
|
$ |
1,378 |
|
|
$ |
1,332 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
5,220 |
|
|
|
2,689 |
|
|
|
11,165 |
|
|
|
10,038 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
9,274 |
|
|
|
20,091 |
|
|
|
24,281 |
|
|
|
47,325 |
|
Other income and expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
15,076 |
|
|
$ |
23,193 |
|
|
$ |
41,630 |
|
|
$ |
58,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007, there was $142.9 million of unrecognized compensation costs related
to Companys various stock-based plans. These costs will be recognized over an expected remaining
weighted-average period of 2.0 years.
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of the stock options granted during the three-month
periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 was $23.55 per share and $20.03 per share, respectively.
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of the stock options granted during the nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 was $23.09 per share and $16.82 per share, respectively.
There have been no significant changes to the assumptions used to estimate the fair value of
options granted during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, as compared to
December 31, 2006.
15
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED)
Stock option transactions for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 under all plans are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Per Option |
|
|
Term (Years) |
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
37,111,688 |
|
|
$ |
18.18 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
$ |
959,600 |
|
Changes during the period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
4,948,070 |
|
|
|
58.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(9,454,166 |
) |
|
|
14.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(677,282 |
) |
|
|
27.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(2,700 |
) |
|
|
22.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2007 |
|
|
31,925,610 |
|
|
$ |
25.43 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,464,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest at September 30, 2007 |
|
|
31,132,182 |
|
|
$ |
25.03 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,440,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested at September 30, 2007 |
|
|
21,539,187 |
|
|
$ |
18.90 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,128,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total fair value of shares vested during the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007
and 2006 was $26.4 million and $20.2 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value of stock
options exercised during the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 was $435.4
million and $370.2 million, respectively. The Company primarily utilizes newly issued shares to
satisfy the exercise of stock options.
10. Income Taxes
The Company periodically evaluates the likelihood of the realization of deferred tax assets, and
reduces the carrying amount of those deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance to the extent it
believes a portion will not be realized. The Company considers many factors when assessing the
likelihood of future realization of its deferred tax assets, including recent cumulative earnings
experience by taxing jurisdiction, expectations of future taxable income, the carryforward periods
available to it for tax reporting purposes and other relevant factors. Significant judgment is
required in making this assessment.
The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 and FSP FIN 48-1 effective January 1, 2007. FIN 48
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial
statements in accordance with SFAS 109 and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement
attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition.
The Company had no cumulative effect adjustment related to the adoption.
The Companys tax returns have been audited by the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, through the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2003. Tax returns for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2004 and
2005 are currently under examination by the IRS. The Company is also subject to audits by various
state and foreign taxing authorities, which are not material to the Companys tax positions as of
September 30, 2007.
The Company regularly reevaluates its tax positions and the associated interest and penalties, if
applicable, resulting from audits of federal, state and foreign income tax filings, as well as
changes in tax law that would reduce the technical merits of the position to below more likely than
not. The Company believes that its accruals for tax liabilities are adequate for all open years.
Many factors are considered in making these evaluations, including past history, recent
interpretations of tax law and the specifics of each matter. Because tax regulations are subject
to interpretation and tax litigation is inherently uncertain, these evaluations can involve a
series of complex judgments about future events and can rely heavily on estimates and assumptions.
These evaluations are based on estimates and assumptions that have been deemed reasonable by
management. However, if managements estimates are not representative of actual outcomes, the
Companys results of operations could be materially impacted.
16
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED)
Unrecognized tax benefits, represented by liabilities on the balance sheet and all subject to
audit, arise when the estimated benefit recorded in the financial statements differs from the
amounts taken or expected to be taken in a tax return because of the uncertainties described above.
Included with the associated liability is gross accrued interest of approximately $3.0 million, as
of January 1, 2007, upon adoption of FIN 48. The liability for unrecognized tax benefits was $85.2
million at January 1, 2007. These unrecognized tax benefits relate primarily to issues common
among multinational corporations. Virtually all of these unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized,
would impact the effective income tax rate. The Company accounts for interest and penalties
related to uncertain tax positions as part of its provision for income taxes. Changes to the
amount of unrecognized tax benefits from January 1, 2007 relate primarily to current year
operations. There are no unrecognized tax benefits as of September 30, 2007 for which it is
reasonably possible that there will be a significant change in the next 12 months. The liability
for unrecognized tax benefits is expected to increase in the next 12 months relating to operations
occurring in that period.
During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, the Company recorded a deferred tax benefit
of approximately $7.0 million, as a result of a research and experimentation tax credit study
covering prior years. In addition, the Company generated research and experimentation tax credits
of $18.1 million during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007 related to stock option
compensation for which no deferred tax benefit was recorded. Under SFAS 123R, excess tax benefits
related to stock option compensation are recognized in the period in which such benefits are
realized through the reduction of income taxes payable.
These tax benefits will be recorded as an increase in additional paid-in capital when realized.
Also, during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, the Company recorded a deferred tax
expense of approximately $4.0 million to adjust deferred tax assets and liabilities for the effect
of changes in state and foreign tax rates.
During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006, the Company recorded a tax benefit of
approximately $6.1 million primarily related to the resolution of certain tax positions taken on
the Companys income tax returns for fiscal years ended December 31, 2000-2002 with the completion
of audits for that period.
17
ITEM 2. Managements Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of
Operations
Forward-Looking Information
Certain statements contained or incorporated by reference in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are
forward-looking statements concerning our business, results of operations, economic performance and
financial condition based on our current expectations. These forward-looking statements are not
guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those implied by such forward-looking statements. Given these
risks and uncertainties, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking
statements.
Executive Summary
Celgene Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively we or our) is a global integrated
biopharmaceutical company primarily engaged in the discovery, development and commercialization of
innovative therapies designed to treat cancer and immune-inflammatory related diseases. Our
primary commercial stage products are REVLIMID® (lenalidomide) and THALOMID® (thalidomide). We also sell ALKERAN®, which we obtain through a supply
and distribution agreement with GlaxoSmithKline, or GSK, and FOCALINTM, which we sell
exclusively to Novartis Pharma AG, or Novartis. Our international operations are in the early
stages of development and we expect them to provide a more significant contribution to future
financial results as our products obtain additional regulatory approval for sale in foreign
markets. Other sources of revenue include royalties which we primarily receive from Novartis on
its sales of the entire family of RITALIN® drugs and FOCALIN XRTM, in
addition to revenues from collaborative agreements and licensing fees.
For the quarter ended
September 30, 2007, we reported revenue of $349.9 million, net income of
$38.8 million and diluted earnings per share of $0.09, representing increases of 42.9%, 90.0%
and 80.0%, respectively, compared to the three-month period ended September 30, 2006. This
increase primarily reflects the expanded use of
REVLIMID®, partly offset by
increased operating expenses required to support our on-going expansion and higher income taxes.
On a year-to-date basis, revenues, net income and diluted per share earnings were $991.2 million,
$151.1 million and $0.36, representing increases of 58.9%, 228.0% and 200.0%, respectively,
compared to the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006.
Our future growth and operating results will depend on continued acceptance of our currently
marketed products, regulatory approvals of both new products and the expanded use of existing
products, depth of our product pipeline and ability to commercialize these products, competition to
our marketed products and challenges to our intellectual property. We continue to expand our
international infrastructure in anticipation of international regulatory approvals and
commercialization of our products. See also Risk Factors contained in Part I, Item 1A of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 and Part II, Item 1A of this
Form 10-Q.
In September 2007, REVLIMID® was granted approval by the Swiss Agency for Therapeutic
Products, or Swissmedic, for use in combination with dexamethasone as a treatment for patients with
multiple myeloma who have received at least one prior therapy. In June 2007, full marketing
authorization was granted to REVLIMID® by the European Commission for use in this same
indication. We are currently working with the appropriate regulatory authorities to determine next
steps for pricing, reimbursement and distribution. A Marketing Authorization Application, or MAA,
seeking approval to market REVLIMID® for treatment of transfusion-dependent anemia due
to low-or-intermediate-1 risk
18
myelodysplastic syndromes associated with a deletion 5q cytogenetic abnormality with or without
additional cytogenetic abnormalities continues to be evaluated by the European Medicines Agencys,
or EMEA, Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, or CHMP. Other international regulatory
initiatives include MAAs currently being evaluated by the Therapeutic Goods Administration in
Australia and Health Canada. In April 2007, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group reported that
its Data Monitoring Committees review of preliminary results from a large, randomized clinical
trial for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma found that the use of a low-dose of
dexamethasone in combination with REVLIMID® suggests survival advantage for patients
when compared to the higher, standard-dose of dexamethasone that is used in combination with
REVLIMID® to treat the disease. These results were also presented at the June 2007
annual American Society of Clinical Oncology medical conference. The regulatory utility of these
findings are unclear at this time.
Over the past several years, we have made substantial investments in research and development in
support of our existing products, proprietary IMiDs® compounds and other pipeline
products as we continue to evaluate them in a broad range of hematological malignancies, other
cancers and other diseases. REVLIMID® is currently being evaluated as a treatment for
non-Hodgkins lymphomas, or NHL, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia, or CLL. In May 2007, we
announced plans to advance the development of leading oral anti-inflammatory candidates across a
broad range of inflammatory diseases. Our oral TNF alpha inhibitor and anti-inflammatory agent,
CC-10004 (apremilast), has demonstrated favorable activity and side effect profiles in placebo
controlled proof-of-mechanism trials in moderate to severe psoriasis. We also opened our
Investigational New Drug application to evaluate CC-4047 (pomalidomide) in a U.S.
proof-of-principle study in sickle cell anemia. We are also evaluating CC-4047 for treatment in
other diseases including myelofibrosis, myeloma and solid tumor cancers.
In September 2007, we entered
into a research collaboration with Array BioPharma Inc.,
or Array, focused on the discovery, development and commercialization of novel therapeutics in
cancer and inflammation. We made an upfront payment of $40.0 million to Array, and, in return,
Array granted us an option to select drugs developed under the collaboration that are directed to
two of four mutually selected discovery targets. Array will be responsible for all discovery and
clinical development through Phase I or Phase IIa. At that time, we will have the option to select
drugs resulting from up to two of these four therapeutic programs and will receive exclusive
worldwide rights to those drugs, except for Arrays limited co-promotional rights in the U.S.
Additionally, Array is entitled to receive, for each drug, potential milestone payments of
approximately $200.0 million, if certain discovery, development and regulatory milestones are
achieved and $300.0 million if certain commercial milestones are achieved, as well as royalties on
net sales.
19
Results of Operations
Three-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2007 and 2006
Total Revenue: Total revenue and related percentages for the three-month periods ended September
30, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Percent |
|
(In thousands $) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net product sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVLIMID® |
|
$ |
199,261 |
|
|
$ |
101,314 |
|
|
$ |
97,947 |
|
|
|
96.7 |
% |
THALOMID® |
|
|
110,730 |
|
|
|
108,370 |
|
|
|
2,360 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
ALKERAN® |
|
|
18,858 |
|
|
|
12,171 |
|
|
|
6,687 |
|
|
|
54.9 |
% |
FOCALINTM |
|
|
2,219 |
|
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
1,041 |
|
|
|
88.4 |
% |
Other |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
40.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net product sales |
|
|
331,169 |
|
|
|
223,105 |
|
|
|
108,064 |
|
|
|
48.4 |
% |
Collaborative agreements
and other revenue |
|
|
4,616 |
|
|
|
4,632 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
-0.3 |
% |
Royalty revenue |
|
|
14,123 |
|
|
|
17,102 |
|
|
|
(2,979 |
) |
|
|
-17.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
349,908 |
|
|
$ |
244,839 |
|
|
$ |
105,069 |
|
|
|
42.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Product Sales: The increase in REVLIMID® net sales for the three-month period
ended September 30, 2007 compared to the three-month period ended September 30, 2006 reflects the
products expanded use in the United States resulting from approval by the Food and Drug
Administration, or FDA, in June 2006 for multiple myeloma and growth in Europe, reflecting the
recent European Commission approval. This increase was partially offset by higher gross
to net sales deductions.
THALOMID® was approved by the FDA in May 2006 in combination with dexamethasone for the
treatment of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and in July 1998 for the treatment of
acute cutaneous manifestations of moderate to severe erythema nodosum leprosum, or ENL, and as
maintenance therapy for prevention and suppression of the cutaneous manifestation of ENL
recurrence. THALOMID® recorded a sales increase for the three-month period ended
September 30, 2007 compared to the three-month period ended September 30, 2006 due to price
increases which more than offset a decrease in unit volumes resulting from a slight reduction in
dosage and patients migrating to REVLIMID®. The U.S. introduction of the 150mg dosage
also contributed to the sales increase. Partially offsetting the increase in THALOMID®
net sales were higher gross to net sales deductions which reflect an anticipated increase in use of
REVLIMID®.
ALKERAN®,
which is licensed from GSK and sold under the Celgene label, is
approved by the FDA for the palliative treatment of multiple myeloma and carcinoma of the ovary.
Net sales were higher in the three-month period ended September 30, 2007 compared to the
three-month period ended September 30, 2006 due to increases in both units and pricing for the
injectable form.
In April 2000, we licensed to Novartis the worldwide rights (excluding Canada) to
FOCALINTM and FOCALIN XRTM, which are approved for the treatment of attention
deficit hyperactivity disorder, or ADHD. We retained the rights to these products for the treatment
of oncology-related disorders. We sell FOCALINTM exclusively to Novartis and also
supply them with FOCALIN XRTM, for which we receive a royalty. Sales of
FOCALINTM increased by $1.0 million in the three-month period ended September 30, 2007
compared to the three-month period ended September 30, 2006.
20
Collaborative Agreements and Other Revenue: Revenues from collaborative agreements and other
sources totaled $4.6 million for each of the three-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006.
Royalty Revenue: Royalty revenue, primarily comprised of amounts earned from Novartis on their
sales of Ritalin® and FOCALIN XRTM, decreased by $3.0 million for the
three-month period ended September 30, 2007 compared to the three-month period ended September 30,
2006. This decrease was due to a decline in Novartis sales volume which was impacted by a
drawdown of its wholesalers inventories.
Gross to Net Sales Accruals: We accrue for sales returns, discounts, Medicaid rebates and
distributor charge-backs and service fees. Allowances for sales returns are based on among other
things: actual returns history for consumed lots, returns trend experience for lots where product
is still being returned, levels of inventory in the distribution channel and the introduction of
competing products. Discount accruals are based on payment terms extended to customers. Medicaid
rebate accruals are based on historical payment data and estimates of future Medicaid beneficiary
utilization. Distributor charge-back accruals are based on the differentials between product
acquisition prices paid by wholesalers and lower government contract pricing paid by eligible
customers covered under federally qualified programs. Distributor services accruals are based on
contractual fees to be paid to the wholesale distributor for services provided. Gross to net sales
accruals and the balance in the related allowance accounts for the three-month periods ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicaid |
|
|
Charge-backs |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Allowances |
|
|
Discounts |
|
|
Rebates |
|
|
and Services |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
14,944 |
|
|
$ |
2,617 |
|
|
$ |
9,167 |
|
|
$ |
9,058 |
|
|
$ |
35,786 |
|
Allowances for sales during 2007 |
|
|
4,015 |
|
|
|
7,640 |
|
|
|
6,626 |
|
|
|
19,083 |
|
|
|
37,364 |
|
Allowances for sales during prior periods |
|
|
6,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,022 |
|
Credits issued for prior year sales |
|
|
(4,010 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,062 |
) |
Credits issued for sales during 2007 |
|
|
(1,545 |
) |
|
|
(7,151 |
) |
|
|
(5,930 |
) |
|
|
(16,514 |
) |
|
|
(31,140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
19,426 |
|
|
$ |
3,083 |
|
|
$ |
9,834 |
|
|
$ |
11,627 |
|
|
$ |
43,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicaid |
|
|
Charge-backs |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
Allowances |
|
|
Discounts |
|
|
Rebates |
|
|
and Services |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at June 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
11,637 |
|
|
$ |
1,752 |
|
|
$ |
7,225 |
|
|
$ |
7,629 |
|
|
$ |
28,243 |
|
Allowances for sales during 2006 |
|
|
6,346 |
|
|
|
5,015 |
|
|
|
4,289 |
|
|
|
16,645 |
|
|
|
32,295 |
|
Allowances for sales during prior periods |
|
|
2,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,479 |
|
Credits issued for prior year sales |
|
|
(5,454 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,540 |
) |
Credits issued for sales during 2006 |
|
|
(3,513 |
) |
|
|
(4,708 |
) |
|
|
(4,458 |
) |
|
|
(14,521 |
) |
|
|
(27,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
11,495 |
|
|
$ |
2,059 |
|
|
$ |
6,970 |
|
|
$ |
9,753 |
|
|
$ |
30,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales return allowances increased in the three-month period ended September 30, 2007 compared
to the three-month period ended September 30, 2006. The higher allowances in the three-month
period ended September 30, 2007 were the result of planned THALOMIDâ inventory
centralization and rationalization at several major pharmacy chains which primarily relates to
sales made during prior periods, as well as the expected increase in THALOMID®
returns resulting from the anticipated increase in use of REVLIMID® in
multiple myeloma as a result of recent clinical data. The increase in allowances was
partially offset by lower Alkeran injectable returns for the three-month period ended September 30,
2007. Discounts increased in the current year quarter primarily from increased sales of
REVLIMID®.
21
Medicaid rebate allowances increased in the three-month period ended September 30, 2007 compared to
the three-month period ended September 30, 2006 primarily due to price increases for both
THALOMID® and REVLIMIDâ as well as increased unit
sales of REVLIMIDâ. Our Medicaid rebate accruals are based on the Medicaid Unit
Rebate Amount formula established by the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services using the
estimated Medicaid dispense quantities. We base the estimated Medicaid dispense quantities on the
previous quarter actual Medicaid dispenses, which individual states typically begin reporting to us
approximately 45 days after the close of each quarter.
Distributor charge-backs increased in the three-month period ended September 30, 2007 compared to
the three-month period ended September 30, 2006 primarily due to REVLIMID®,
THALOMID® and ALKERAN® IV price increases, which increased the
differential between annual contract pricing available to federally funded healthcare providers and
our wholesale acquisition cost.
Operating Costs and Expenses: Operating costs, expenses and related percentages for the
three-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
$ |
34,079 |
|
|
$ |
34,205 |
|
|
$ |
(126 |
) |
|
|
-0.4 |
% |
Percent of net product sales |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
130,545 |
|
|
$ |
66,756 |
|
|
$ |
63,789 |
|
|
|
95.6 |
% |
Percent of total revenue |
|
|
37.3 |
% |
|
|
27.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
97,309 |
|
|
$ |
89,592 |
|
|
$ |
7,717 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
% |
Percent of total revenue |
|
|
27.8 |
% |
|
|
36.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Goods Sold: Cost of goods sold decreased slightly in the three-month period ended
September 30, 2007 compared to the three-month period ended September 30, 2006 partly due to lower
material costs for the injectable form of ALKERAN® which offset higher costs
and royalties related to higher unit sales of REVLIMID®. The increase
in REVLIMID® sales had a favorable impact on cost of goods sold as a
percent of net product sales, since the product carries a lower cost of sales relative to our other
products.
Research and Development: Research and development expenses increased by $63.8 million for the
three-month period ended September 30, 2007 compared to the three-month period ended September 30,
2006 primarily due to charges for our $40.0 million collaborative research and development
arrangement for early stage compounds with Array and $1.1 million collaborative research and
development arrangement with PTC Therapeutics. In addition, expenses increased related to clinical
development and support of multiple programs across a broad range of cancers, including NHL.
Expenses to support ongoing research of other compounds, such as the IMiD® CC-4047
(pomalidomide), as well as our kinase and ligase inhibitor programs and placental-derived
stem/progenitor cell program, also increased. Tumor flare reaction and tumor lysis syndrome were
observed in approximately 3% of CLL patients treated with REVLIMID®. As a result
of these findings, we temporarily delayed the enrollment of new
patients into our CLL-001 study and
amended the protocol to begin patients at a lower, better tolerated dose with a dose escalation. The
amended protocol was then reinitiated and is open for enrollment.
22
In addition to the $41.1 million of research and development expenses due to our collaborative
arrangements noted above, research and development expenses for the three-month period ended
September 30, 2007 consisted of $32.3 million spent on human pharmaceutical clinical programs;
$42.7 million spent on other pharmaceutical programs, including toxicology, analytical research and
development, drug discovery, quality and regulatory affairs; $10.4 million spent on
biopharmaceutical discovery and development programs; and $4.0 million spent on placental
stem/progenitor cell and biomaterials programs. For the three-month period ended September 30,
2006, research and development expenses consisted of $24.9 million spent on human pharmaceutical
clinical programs; $28.5 million spent on other pharmaceutical programs, including toxicology,
analytical research and development, drug discovery, quality and regulatory affairs; $9.9 million
spent on biopharmaceutical discovery and development programs; and $3.5 million spent on placental
stem/progenitor cell and biomaterials programs.
Selling, General and Administrative: Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by
$7.7 million for the three-month period ended September 30, 2007 compared to the three-month period
ended September 30, 2006 primarily due to an increase in donations to support non-profit
foundations that assist patients with the co-payments; an increase in sales force costs related to
REVLIMID® product launch preparation activities in Europe, and continued
international expansion throughout Europe, Japan, Australia and Canada.
Interest and Investment Income, Net: Interest and investment income, net was $28.3 million for the
three-month period ended September 30, 2007, representing an increase of $19.0 million over the
$9.3 million recorded for the three-month period ended September 30, 2006. The increase was due to
higher average cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities balances resulting from the
November 2006 issuance of an additional 20,000,000 shares of our common stock, which generated net
proceeds of $1.006 billion. In addition, the three-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006
included other-than-temporary impairment losses on marketable securities available for sale of $1.8
million and $0.3 million, respectively.
Equity in Losses of Affiliated Companies: Under the equity method of accounting, we recorded
losses of $1.1 million and $0.7 million for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and
2006, respectively. The increase in losses was primarily due to increased losses related to our
investment in EntreMed.
Interest Expense: Interest expense was $2.6 million and $2.4 million for the three-month periods
ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The $0.2 million increase related to the note
payable to Siegfried Ltd. and Siegfried Dienste AG (collectively Siegfried) in connection with
our December 2006 purchase of an active pharmaceutical ingredient, or API, manufacturing facility
in Zofingen, Switzerland.
Other Income (Expense), Net: Other income (expense), net was a net income of $0.7 million for the
three-month period ended September 30, 2007 and net income of $1.1 million for the three-month
period ended September 30, 2006. The decrease for the three-month period ended September 30, 2007
was due to a decrease in foreign exchange gains.
Income Tax Provision: The income tax provision for the three-month period ended September 30, 2007
was $74.5 million and reflects an effective tax rate of 65.7%. The effective tax rate reflects the
tax expense impact of certain expenses incurred in taxing jurisdictions outside the United States
for which we do not presently receive a tax benefit and nondeductible expenses, which include
share-based compensation expense related to incentive stock options. The effective tax rate also
reflects a tax expense of approximately $4.0 million to adjust deferred tax assets and liabilities
for the effect of changes in tax rates. The income tax provision for the three-month period ended
September 30, 2006 was $41.1 million,
reflecting an effective tax rate of 66.8%. The decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily
due to higher earnings in the three-month period ended September 30, 2007.
23
Results of Operations
Nine-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2007 and 2006
Total Revenue: Total revenue and related percentages for the nine-month periods ended September 30,
2007 and 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Percent |
|
(In thousands $) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net product sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVLIMID® |
|
$ |
526,457 |
|
|
$ |
196,777 |
|
|
$ |
329,680 |
|
|
|
167.5 |
% |
THALOMID® |
|
|
334,472 |
|
|
|
322,774 |
|
|
|
11,698 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
ALKERAN® |
|
|
53,560 |
|
|
|
34,918 |
|
|
|
18,642 |
|
|
|
53.4 |
% |
FOCALINTM |
|
|
5,171 |
|
|
|
4,945 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
Other |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
-25.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net product sales |
|
|
919,910 |
|
|
|
559,749 |
|
|
|
360,161 |
|
|
|
64.3 |
% |
Collaborative agreements
and other revenue |
|
|
14,520 |
|
|
|
12,848 |
|
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
% |
Royalty revenue |
|
|
56,800 |
|
|
|
51,322 |
|
|
|
5,478 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
991,230 |
|
|
$ |
623,919 |
|
|
$ |
367,311 |
|
|
|
58.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Product Sales: REVLIMID® net sales increased in the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2007 compared to the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 primarily due to the
products expanded use in the United States resulting from the FDAs June 2006 approval in multiple myeloma and growth
in Europe, resulting from the recent European Commissions approval in multiple myeloma.
The establishment of our European Named Patient Program, or NPP, which offers European patients in
need of treatment access to REVLIMID®, also contributed to the increase in sales.
Net sales of THALOMID® were higher for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007
compared to the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 primarily due to price increases and
lower gross to net adjustments. These favorable impacts were partly offset by lower sales volumes
resulting from average daily dose declines.
ALKERAN® net sales were higher in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007
compared to the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 as declines in unit sales for both
tablet and injectable forms were offset by higher pricing for the injectable form and lower gross
to net deductions.
Collaborative Agreements and Other Revenue: Revenues from collaborative agreements and other
sources totaled $14.5 million and $12.8 million for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007
and 2006, respectively. The $1.7 million increase in the nine-month period ended September 30,
2007 was primarily due to license fees generated from our S.T.E.P.S.®
program and umbilical cord blood enrollment, collection and storage fees generated through our
LifeBank USASM business.
24
Royalty Revenue: Royalty revenue increased by $5.5 million for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2007 compared to the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 primarily due to
amounts received from Novartis on its sales of FOCALIN XRTM.
Gross to Net Sales Accruals: Gross to net sales accruals and the balance in the related allowance
accounts for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicaid |
|
|
Charge-backs |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Allowances |
|
|
Discounts |
|
|
Rebates |
|
|
And Services |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
9,480 |
|
|
$ |
2,296 |
|
|
$ |
7,468 |
|
|
$ |
10,633 |
|
|
$ |
29,877 |
|
Allowances for sales during 2007 |
|
|
15,165 |
|
|
|
20,036 |
|
|
|
20,858 |
|
|
|
52,303 |
|
|
|
108,362 |
|
Allowances for sales during prior periods |
|
|
13,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,522 |
|
Credits issued for prior year sales |
|
|
(14,517 |
) |
|
|
(2,206 |
) |
|
|
(7,060 |
) |
|
|
(6,725 |
) |
|
|
(30,508 |
) |
Credits issued for sales during 2007 |
|
|
(4,224 |
) |
|
|
(17,043 |
) |
|
|
(11,432 |
) |
|
|
(44,584 |
) |
|
|
(77,283 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
19,426 |
|
|
$ |
3,083 |
|
|
$ |
9,834 |
|
|
$ |
11,627 |
|
|
$ |
43,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicaid |
|
|
Charge-backs |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
Allowances |
|
|
Discounts |
|
|
Rebates |
|
|
And Services |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
5,017 |
|
|
$ |
1,447 |
|
|
$ |
20,960 |
|
|
$ |
6,778 |
|
|
$ |
34,202 |
|
Allowances for sales during 2006 |
|
|
23,805 |
|
|
|
13,502 |
|
|
|
16,116 |
|
|
|
43,135 |
|
|
|
96,558 |
|
Allowances for sales during prior periods |
|
|
25,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
25,920 |
|
Credits issued for prior year sales |
|
|
(30,475 |
) |
|
|
(1,479 |
) |
|
|
(20,348 |
) |
|
|
(6,314 |
) |
|
|
(58,616 |
) |
Credits issued for sales during 2006 |
|
|
(12,309 |
) |
|
|
(11,411 |
) |
|
|
(9,758 |
) |
|
|
(34,309 |
) |
|
|
(67,787 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
11,495 |
|
|
$ |
2,059 |
|
|
$ |
6,970 |
|
|
$ |
9,753 |
|
|
$ |
30,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales return allowances decreased in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007 compared
to the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006. The allowance for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2006 included returns from one large retail pharmacy chain resulting from its efforts
to more aggressively manage inventory at its pharmacies as well as higher returns due to our
previous trade carton configuration, which included up to ten sleeves of THALOMID®
capsules with each order and S.T.E.P.S.® related restrictions, which limited the
chains ability to transfer inventories between its locations. As a result of the higher returns
activity, we recorded additional allowances for all estimated THALOMID® pharmacy
inventories and implemented other measures, including the introduction of single sleeve units
beginning on June 7, 2006 (rather than requiring full carton purchases), which was designed to
allow customers to more effectively manage their inventories since they can now order smaller
quantities. The allowance for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007 reflects the planned
THALOMIDâ inventory centralization and rationalization at several major pharmacy
chains which primarily relates to sales made during prior periods, and expected increase in
THALOMID® returns resulting from the anticipated increase in use of
REVLIMID® in multiple myeloma, partially offset by lower returns
of ALKERAN® IV. Discounts increased in the nine-month period ended September 30,
2006 primarily from increased sales of REVLIMID®.
25
Medicaid rebate allowances increased in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007 compared to
the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 due to increased sales of REVLIMID®
as well as price increases for both THALOMID® and REVLIMID®. Our
Medicaid rebate accruals are based on the Medicaid Unit Rebate Amount formula established by the
Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services using the estimated Medicaid dispense quantities.
REVLIMID® dispenses increased resulting from the introduction of the 15mg and 25mg
strength tablets.
Distributor charge-backs increased in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007 compared to
the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 primarily due to REVLIMID®,
THALOMID® and ALKERAN® IV price increases, which increased the
differential between annual contract pricing available to federally funded healthcare providers and
our wholesale acquisition cost.
Operating Costs and Expenses: Operating costs, expenses and related percentages for the nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
$ |
84,835 |
|
|
$ |
91,148 |
|
|
$ |
(6,313 |
) |
|
|
-6.9 |
% |
Percent of net product sales |
|
|
9.2 |
% |
|
|
16.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
300,054 |
|
|
$ |
178,298 |
|
|
$ |
121,756 |
|
|
|
68.3 |
% |
Percent of total revenue |
|
|
30.3 |
% |
|
|
28.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
318,716 |
|
|
$ |
239,495 |
|
|
$ |
79,221 |
|
|
|
33.1 |
% |
Percent of total revenue |
|
|
32.2 |
% |
|
|
38.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Goods Sold: Cost of goods sold and cost of goods sold as a percent of net product
sales decreased for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007 compared to the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2006 primarily due to lower ALKERAN® costs resulting
from lower sales volumes and unit costs related to ALKERAN® for injection, which
was partly offset by higher REVLIMID® material costs and royalties due
to a higher sales level. The increase in REVLIMID® sales favorably
impacted cost of goods sold as a percentage of net product sales due to the products lower cost of
sales relative to our other products.
Research and Development: Research and development expenses increased by $121.8 million for the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2007 compared to the nine-month period ended September 30,
2006 primarily due to charges for our $40.0 million collaborative research and development
arrangement for early stage compounds with Array and $1.1 million collaborative research and
development
arrangement with PTC Therapeutics. In addition, expenses increased related to clinical development
in support of multiple programs, including REVLIMID® and other
IMiDs® across a broad range of cancers, including NHL and CLL. Expenses to
support ongoing research of other compounds, such as our kinase and ligase inhibitor programs and
placental-derived stem/progenitor cell program, increased also.
For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, in addition to the $41.1 million of research
and development expense due to collaborative arrangements noted above, research and development
expenses consisted of $101.8 million spent on human pharmaceutical clinical programs; $114.7
million spent on other pharmaceutical programs, including toxicology, analytical research and
development, drug discovery, quality and regulatory affairs; $31.6 million spent on
biopharmaceutical discovery and development programs; and $10.9 million spent on placental stem
cell and biomaterials programs. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006, expenses
consisted of $66.7 million spent on human pharmaceutical clinical programs; $73.8 million spent on
other pharmaceutical programs, including toxicology, analytical research and development, drug
discovery, quality and regulatory affairs; $28.8 million spent on biopharmaceutical discovery and
development programs; and $9.0 million spent on placental stem/progenitor cell and biomaterials
programs.
26
Selling, General and Administrative: Selling, general and administrative expenses increased for
the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007 by $79.2 million compared to the nine-month period
ended September 30, 2006 primarily due to an increase in donations to non-profit foundations that
assist patients with the co-payments, higher marketing and sales force costs related to product
launch preparation activities in Europe,continued international expansion throughout Europe, Japan,
Australia and Canada plus an increase in general administrative expenses primarily related to
increased personnel levels and professional and other outside service costs due to our continued
growth.
Interest and Investment Income, Net: Interest and investment income, net was $79.4 million for
the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, representing an increase of $57.3 million compared
to the $22.1 million recorded for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006. The increase was
due to higher average cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities balances resulting from the
November 2006 issuance of an additional 20,000,000 shares of our common stock, which generated net
proceeds of $1.006 billion. In addition, the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006
included other-than-temporary impairment losses on marketable securities available for sale of $3.0
million and $3.8 million, respectively.
Equity in Losses of Affiliated Companies: Under the equity method of accounting, we recorded
losses of $3.3 million and $5.2 million for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and
2006, respectively. The decrease in losses was primarily due to our investment in EntreMed, which
included a charge of $3.1 million for in-process research and development related to EntreMeds
acquisition of Miikana Therapeutics Inc. in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006.
Interest Expense: Interest expense was $7.9 million and $7.1 million for the nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The $0.8 million increase related to the note
payable to Siegfried in connection with our December 2006 purchase of an API manufacturing facility
in Zofingen, Switzerland.
Other Income (Expense), Net: Other income (expense), net was a net expense of $3.3 million and net
income of $4.2 million for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The decrease was due to a decrease in foreign exchange gains and termination benefit resulting from
the modification of certain outstanding stock options of a terminated employee.
Income Tax Provision: The income tax provision for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007
was $201.4 million and reflects an effective tax rate of 57.1%. The effective tax rate reflects
the tax
expense impact of certain expenses incurred in taxing jurisdictions outside the United States for
which we do not presently receive a tax benefit and nondeductible expenses, which include
share-based compensation expense related to incentive stock options. The effective tax rate also
reflects a tax benefit of approximately $7.0 million related to a research and experimentation tax
credit study covering prior years and a tax expense of approximately $4.0 million to adjust
deferred tax assets and liabilities for the effect of changes in tax rates. The income tax
provision for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 was $82.9 million and reflects an
effective tax rate of 64.3%, adjusted for tax benefits of approximately $6.1 million primarily
related to the resolution of certain tax positions taken on our income tax returns for the fiscal
years ended December 31, 2000 through 2002. The decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily
due to higher earnings in the current year period.
27
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities for the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Increase / |
|
(In thousands $) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
310,933 |
|
|
$ |
42,828 |
|
|
$ |
268,105 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
$ |
(962,890 |
) |
|
$ |
(52,056 |
) |
|
$ |
(910,834 |
) |
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
$ |
248,647 |
|
|
$ |
125,781 |
|
|
$ |
122,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities: Net cash provided by operating activities increased in the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2007, as compared to net cash used in operating activities in the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2006, primarily due to higher earnings, higher accruals for
income taxes payable and accrued expenses driven by the growth of our business and net tax refunds
of $11.1 million in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007 versus payments of $24.1 million
in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006. During the nine-month period ended September
30, 2006, our accounts receivable and inventory continued to grow, reflecting the increased demand
for our products.
Investing Activities: Net cash used in investing activities in the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2007 included $899.5 million for net purchases of available-for-sale marketable
securities, $38.4 million for capital expenditures, and $23.4 million for purchases of long term
investments. Our ongoing construction of a drug product manufacturing facility at our Neuchatel,
Switzerland site and expansion and renovation of our headquarters in Summit, New Jersey were the
primary areas of capital spending during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007. Net cash
used in investing activities in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 included $31.9
million for capital expenditures and $17.5 million for net purchases of marketable securities
available for sale.
Financing Activities: Net cash provided by financing activities in the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2007 included $136.0 million from the exercise of employee stock options and $112.6
million from excess tax benefits recognized upon exercise of such options, as compared to $68.0
million from the exercise of employee stock options and $57.8 million from excess tax benefits
recognized upon exercise of such options in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 123R, Share-Based Payments, requires
excess tax benefits (i.e., the tax benefit recognized upon exercise of stock options in excess of
the benefit recognized from
recognizing compensation cost for those options) to be classified as financing cash flows in the
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.
The following table summarizes our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities and working
capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands $) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Increase |
|
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities |
|
$ |
2,529,705 |
|
|
$ |
1,982,220 |
|
|
$ |
547,485 |
|
Working capital(1) |
|
$ |
2,624,433 |
|
|
$ |
1,990,969 |
|
|
$ |
633,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, accounts receivable, net of allowances,
inventory, other current assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses, income taxes payable and other
current liabilities. |
28
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities: The increase of $547.5 million was
primarily due to $272.5 million of operating cash flows offset by capital expenditures plus $248.7
million of net cash provided by financing activities.
Working Capital: The $633.5 million increase in our working capital was primarily attributable to
the following:
|
|
|
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities increased $547.5 million, as noted
above. |
|
|
|
|
Income taxes payable decreased $84.0 million primarily due to the reclassification of
$85.2 million of certain income tax liabilities to non-current income taxes payable in
conjunction with the adoption of FIN 48. |
|
|
|
|
Inventory increased $30.8 million during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007.
ALKERAN® inventories increased $11.3 million due to the timing of our
purchases from GSK. REVLIMID® inventories increased $9.5 million in anticipation of our European
product launch and to support continued increases in our U.S. sales. |
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances increased $18.6 million during the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2007 primarily due to a 64.3% increase in our net product sales,
partially offset by an improvement in our Days Sales Outstanding from 45 days at December
31, 2006 to 42 days at September 30, 2007. |
And was partially offset by a decrease in working capital primarily due to the following:
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities increased $57.7 million
primarily due to increases in accruals for sales returns, European value-added sales taxes
and other outside service costs. |
Financial Condition
We invest our excess cash primarily in money market funds and in highly liquid debt instruments of
the U.S. Treasury, government-sponsored agencies and U.S. corporations.
We expect to make substantial additional expenditures to further develop and commercialize our
products. We expect increased research and product development costs, clinical trial costs,
expenses associated with the regulatory approval process, international expansion costs and
commercialization of product costs and capital investments. However, existing cash, cash
equivalents and marketable securities available for sale, combined with cash received from expected
net product sales and revenues from various research, collaboration and royalty agreements, are
expected to provide sufficient capital
resources to fund our operations for the foreseeable future.
Our convertible 1.75% notes mature in June 2008 and are convertible at any time into 33,001,483
shares of common stock at a stock-adjusted conversion price of $12.1125 per share. The dilution
effect of our convertible debt is included in our diluted earnings per share calculation. Based on
the current price of our common stock, we expect noteholders to convert the notes into shares of
common stock and do not expect such conversion to have a material impact on our financial
condition, liquidity or capital resources.
29
Contractual Obligations
For a discussion of our contractual obligations, see Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2006. As of September 30, 2007, we satisfied the minimum requirement for
product purchases from GSK of $29.1 million related to our ALKERAN® supply
agreements. We have provided a liability for unrecognized tax benefits related to various federal,
state and foreign income tax matters of $158.2 million, at September 30, 2007. The timing of the
settlement of these amounts was not reasonably estimable at September 30, 2007. There were no
other significant changes to our contractual obligations during the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2007.
Critical Accounting Policies
A critical accounting policy is one that is both important to the portrayal of our financial
condition and results of operation and requires managements most difficult, subjective or complex
judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are
inherently uncertain. Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 of
the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. Our critical accounting policies are disclosed in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. The significant changes and/or
expanded discussion of such critical accounting policies are as follows:
We adopted the provisions of FIN 48 and FSP FIN 48-1 effective January 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies
the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements
in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, and prescribes a
recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and
measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides
guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure and transition. We had no cumulative effect adjustment related to the adoption. We
account for interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as part of our provision for
income taxes. We provide estimates for unrecognized tax benefits. If our estimates are not
representative of actual outcomes, our results could be materially impacted.
ITEM 3. Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The following discussion provides forward-looking quantitative and qualitative information about
our potential exposure to market risk. Market risk represents the potential loss arising from
adverse changes in the value of financial instruments. The risk of loss is assessed based on the
likelihood of adverse changes in fair values, cash flows or future earnings.
We have established guidelines relative to the diversification and maturities of investments to
maintain safety and liquidity. These guidelines are reviewed periodically and may be modified
depending on market conditions. Although investments may be subject to credit risk, our investment
policy specifies
credit quality standards for our investments and limits the amount of credit exposure from any
single issue, issuer or type of investment. At September 30, 2007, our market risk sensitive
instruments consisted of derivatives, marketable securities available for sale, unsecured
convertible notes issued by us and our note payable to Siegfried.
30
Derivatives: We periodically utilize forward contracts to hedge non-functional currency exposures.
At September 30, 2007, we had foreign currency forward contracts outstanding to economically hedge
non-functional currency assets denominated in Swiss Francs, British Pounds and U.S. dollars. The
aggregate notional amount of these contracts was $56.6 million and they expire within one year. The
contracts are economic hedges of receivables at U.K. and Swiss foreign entities and are remeasured
through earnings each period. At September 30, 2007, the net
unrealized gain on the forward contracts was approximately $2 million in the aggregate.
Although not predictive in nature, we believe a hypothetical 10% threshold reflects a reasonably
possible near-term change in foreign currency rates. Assuming that the quarter-end exchange rates
were to change by a hypothetical 10% decrease in the underlying currencies, the fair value of the
contracts would decrease by approximately $8.6 million. Conversely, a hypothetical 10% increase in
the underlying exchange rates would increase the fair value of the contracts by approximately $6.3
million. However, since the contracts economically hedge assets denominated in currencies other than the
entitys functional currency, any change in the fair value of the contract would be offset by a
change in the underlying value of the hedged items.
Marketable Securities Available for Sale: At September 30, 2007, our marketable securities
available for sale consisted of U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency
securities, mortgage-backed obligations, corporate debt securities, other asset-backed securities
and 1,939,598 shares of Pharmion Corporation common stock. Marketable securities available for
sale are carried at fair value, held for an indefinite period of time and intended for use in
meeting our ongoing liquidity needs. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities,
which are deemed to be temporary, are reported as a separate component of stockholders equity, net
of tax. The cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of
discounts to maturity. The amortization, along with realized gains and losses, is included in
interest and investment income, net.
As of September 30, 2007, the principal amounts, fair values and related weighted average interest
rates of our investments in debt securities classified as marketable securities available-for-sale
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 1 |
|
|
1 to 3 |
|
|
3 to 5 |
|
|
More Than 5 |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands $) |
|
Year |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal amount |
|
$ |
385,739 |
|
|
$ |
874,115 |
|
|
$ |
120,360 |
|
|
$ |
22,900 |
|
|
$ |
1,403,114 |
|
Fair value |
|
$ |
386,531 |
|
|
$ |
873,382 |
|
|
$ |
119,046 |
|
|
$ |
20,518 |
|
|
$ |
1,399,477 |
|
Stated average interest rate |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pharmion Common Stock: At September 30, 2007, we held a total of 1,939,598 shares of Pharmion
Corporation common stock, with an estimated fair value of approximately $89.5 million (based on the
closing price reported by the NASDAQ Global Market), which exceeded the cost by approximately $69.3
million. The amount by which the fair value exceeded the cost (i.e., the unrealized gain) was
included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in the Stockholders Equity section of the
Consolidated Balance Sheet. The fair value of the Pharmion common stock investment is subject to
market price
volatility, and any increase or decrease in Pharmion common stocks quoted market price will have a
similar percentage increase or decrease in the fair value of our investment.
Convertible Debt: In June 2003, we issued an aggregate principal amount of $400.0 million of
unsecured convertible notes. The convertible notes have a five-year term and a coupon rate of
1.75% payable semi-annually. The convertible notes can be converted at any time into 33,001,483
shares of common stock at a stock-split adjusted conversion price of $12.1125 per share. At
September 30, 2007, the fair value of the convertible notes exceeded the carrying value of $399.7
million by approximately $1.954 billion, which we believe reflects the increase in the market price
of our common stock to $71.31 per share as of September 30, 2007. Assuming other factors are held
constant, an increase in interest rates generally results in a decrease in the fair value of
fixed-rate convertible debt, but does not impact the carrying value, and an increase in our stock
price generally results in an increase in the fair value of convertible debt, but does not impact
the carrying value.
31
Note Payable: At September 30, 2007, the fair value of our note payable to Siegfried approximated
the carrying value of the note of $24.3 million, due to the short period of time since we issued
it. Assuming other factors are held constant, an increase in interest rates generally will result
in a decrease in the fair value of the note. The fair value of the note will also be affected by
changes in the U.S. dollar to Swiss franc exchange rate. The note is denominated in Swiss francs.
ITEM 4. Controls And Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As of the end of the period covered by this
quarterly report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of
the Companys management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based upon the foregoing
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and
forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in our
internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
As described in Part I, Item 3, Legal Proceedings, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal
year ended December 31, 2006, on August 19, 2004, we, together with our exclusive licensee
Novartis, filed an infringement action in the United States District Court of New Jersey against
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., or Teva, in response to notices of Paragraph IV certifications made
by Teva in connection with the filing of an Abbreviated New Drug Application, or ANDA, for
FOCALIN. The notification letters contend that United States Patent Nos. 5,908,850, or 850
patent, and 6,355,656, or 656 patent, are invalid. After the suit was filed, Novartis listed
another patent, United States Patent No. 6,528,530, or 530 patent, in the Orange Book in
association with the FOCALIN NDA. On March 27, 2007, the U.S. PTO issued a Reexamination
Certificate for the 656 patent. On December 21, 2006, we and Novartis filed an action in the
United States District Court of New Jersey against Teva for infringement of the 656 patent. Teva
filed an amended answer and counterclaim on March 23, 2007. The amended counterclaim
seeks a declaratory judgment of patent invalidity, noninfringement, and unenforceability. The
statutory 30-month stay of FDA approval of Tevas ANDA expired on January 9, 2007, and Teva
proceeded to market with a generic version of FOCALIN. The parties currently are engaged in fact
discovery with respect to the 656 patent and other issues related to Tevas product launch. A
claim has been made for damages resulting from Tevas sales and for a permanent injunction
prohibiting future sales by Teva. No trial date has been set. The 530 patent is not part of the
patent infringement action against Teva.
32
On September 14, 2007, we, together with our exclusive licensee Novartis, filed an infringement
action in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against Teva
Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. in response to a notice of a Paragraph IV certification made by Teva in
connection with the filing of an ANDA for FOCALIN XR. The notification letter contends that
claims in United States Patent Nos. 5,908,850, 6,355,656, 6,528,530, 5,837,284 and 6,635,284 are
invalid, unenforceable and not infringed by the proposed Teva products. Teva is expected to answer
or otherwise respond to the complaint on or before November 5, 2007. If we are unsuccessful in
defending our patents by a Court of final decision, Novartis sales of FOCALIN XR could be
significantly reduced in the United States by the entrance of a generic FOCALIN XR product,
consequently reducing our revenue from royalties associated with these sales.
On October 5, 2007, we, together with our exclusive licensee Novartis, filed an infringement action
in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against IntelliPharmaCeutics
Corp., or IPC, in response to a notice of a Paragraph IV certification made by IPC in connection
with the filing of an ANDA for FOCALIN XR. The notification letter contends that claims in United
States Patent Nos. 5,908,850, 6,355,656, 6,528,530, 5,837,284 and 6,635,284 are invalid,
unenforceable, and not infringed by the proposed IPC products. IPC is expected to answer or
otherwise respond to the complaint on or before November 5, 2007. If we are unsuccessful in
defending our patents by a Court of final decision, Novartis sales of FOCALIN XR could be
significantly reduced in the United States by the entrance of a generic FOCALIN XR product,
consequently reducing our revenue from royalties associated with these sales.
As described in Part I, Item 3, Legal Proceedings, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal
year ended December 31, 2006, on December 4, 2006, we, together with our exclusive licensee
Novartis, filed an infringement action in the United States District Court for the District of New
Jersey against Abrika Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Abrika Pharmaceuticals, LLP, (collectively referred
to herein as Abrika), in response to a notice of a Paragraph IV certification made by Abrika
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in connection with the filing of an ANDA for RITALIN LA®. The notification
letter contends that claims in United States Patent Nos. 5,837,284 and 6,635,284 are invalid and
are not infringed by the proposed Abrika products. Abrika filed an answer and counterclaim in the
New Jersey court on June 1, 2007. The counterclaim seeks a declaratory judgment of patent
invalidity, noninfringement, and unenforceability. On September 26, 2007, Abrika / Actavis South
Atlantic LLC sent a Paragraph IV certification to Celgene and Novartis in connection with the
filing of an ANDA supplement with respect to Abrikas proposed 10 mg RITALIN LA® product. We and
Novartis are seeking to amend the New Jersey complaint to include Abrikas proposed 10 mg RITALIN
LA® product. The parties currently are engaged in fact discovery. No trial date has been set. If
we are unsuccessful in defending our patents by a Court of final decision, Novartis sales of
RITALIN LA® could be significantly reduced in the United States by the entrance of a generic
RITALIN LA® product, consequently reducing our revenue from royalties associated with these sales.
On October 4, 2007, we, together with our exclusive licensee Novartis, filed an infringement action
in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against KV Pharmaceutical
Company, or KV, in response to a notice of a Paragraph IV certification made by KV in connection
with the filing of an ANDA for RITALIN LA®. The notification letter contends that claims in United
States Patent Nos. 5,837,284 and 6,635,284 are not infringed by the proposed KV products. KV is expected to answer or
otherwise respond to the complaint on or before November 26, 2007. If we are unsuccessful in
defending our patents by a Court of final decision, Novartis sales of RITALIN LA® could be
significantly reduced in the United States by the entrance of a generic RITALIN LA® product,
consequently reducing our revenue from royalties associated with these sales.
33
As described in Part I, Item 3, Legal Proceedings, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal
year ended December 31, 2006, Barr Laboratories, Inc., or Barr, a generic drug manufacturer has
filed an ANDA with a Paragraph IV certification seeking authorization from the FDA to market a
generic version of 50mg, 100mg and 200mg THALOMID® in the United States for the
treatment of acute cutaneous manifestations of moderate to severe ENL. On January 18, 2007, we
filed an infringement action in the United States District Court of New Jersey against Barr. By
bringing suit, we are entitled up to a maximum 30-month injunction, from the date of the court
filing, against the applicants marketing of generic THALOMID®. In June 2007, United States Patent
No. 7,230,012, or 012 patent, was issued to us claiming formulations of thalidomide and was then
timely listed in the Orange Book. Barr sent a new Paragraph IV certification against the 012
patent and alleged that the claims of the 012 patent, directed to formulations which encompass
THALOMID®, were invalid. On August 23, 2007, we filed an infringement action in the United States
District Court of New Jersey with respect to the 012 patent. We intend to enforce our patent
rights. If the ANDA is approved by the FDA, and Barr is successful in challenging our patents
listed in the Orange Book for THALOMID®, Barr would be permitted to sell a generic thalidomide
product.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
The risk factors included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006 have not materially changed as of September 30, 2007, except as follows:
We may not be able to protect our intellectual property and our products may be subject to
generic competition.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to obtain and enforce patents, protect trade
secrets, obtain licenses to technology owned by third parties and to conduct our business without
infringing upon the proprietary rights of others. The patent positions of pharmaceutical and
biopharmaceutical firms, including ours, can be uncertain and involve complex legal and factual
questions. As disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2006, on August 19, 2004, we, together with our exclusive licensee Novartis, filed an infringement
action in the United States District Court of New Jersey against Teva, in response to notices of
Paragraph IV certifications made by Teva in connection with the filing of an ANDA for FOCALIN. In
addition, on December 4, 2006, we, together with our exclusive licensee Novartis, filed an
infringement action in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against
Abrika Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Abrika, in response to a notice of a Paragraph IV certification
made by Abrika in connection with the filing of an ANDA for RITALIN LA®. See Part II, Item 1,
Legal Proceedings, for a description of material developments in these infringement actions as
well as two additional infringement actions filed by us, together with our exclusive licensee
Novartis, in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against each of IPC
and KV.
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
34
ITEM 5. Other Information
None.
ITEM 6. Exhibits
10.1 |
|
Amendment No. 3 to the Celgene Corporation 1998 Stock Incentive Plan effective August 22,
2007 (Amended and Restated as of April 23, 2003 and as further amended). |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification by the Companys Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification by the Companys Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification by the Companys Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.2 |
|
Certification by the Companys Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
35
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CELGENE CORPORATION
|
|
DATE November 2, 2007 |
By: |
/s/David W. Gryska
|
|
|
|
David W. Gryska |
|
|
|
Sr. Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
DATE November 2, 2007 |
By: |
/s/Andre Van Hoek
|
|
|
|
Andre Van Hoek |
|
|
|
Controller and
Chief Accounting Officer |
|
|
36
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to the Celgene Corporation 1998 Stock Incentive Plan effective August 22,
2007 (Amended and Restated as of April 23, 2003 and as further amended). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification by the Companys Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification by the Companys Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification by the Companys Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification by the Companys Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
37